alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
(logo) PACIFIC LIFE

 

 

 

**MANAGEMENT'S****REPORT ON ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE W****ITH SEC**

**REGULATION****AB SERVICING CRITERIA**

 

 

 

Pacific Life Insurance Company (the "Asserting Party") is responsible for assessing compliance, as of and for the year ended December 31 , 2014, with the Relevant Servicing Criteria set forth in Item 1122 (d) of the SEC ' s Regulation AB, specifically criteria 1122(d)(3)(i )(a-c) a n d (d)(4)(vii) , which management has determined to be applicable to the activities performed by the Company with respect to the Platform (such criteria, the " Applicable Servicing Criteria").  The transactions covered by this report include all asset-backed transactions under the Securitized Commercial Mortgage Loans Operating Advisor Platform (the " Platform " ) , as listed in Appendix A. 

 

The Asserting Party has used the criteria set forth in paragraph (d) of Item 1122 of Regulation AB in order to assess the effectiveness of Pacific Life Insurance Company's compliance  with the Applicable Servicing Criteria as of and for the year ended December 31 , 2014. The Asserting Party has concluded that it has complied, in all material respects, with the Applicable Servicing Criteria as of and for the year ended December 31 , 2014, with respect to the Platform taken as a whole. 

 

Deloitte & Touche LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report for the Platform on the assessment of compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria as of and for the year ended December 31 , 2014 , as set forth in this assertion . 

 

 

Pacific Life Insurance Company 

 

 

 

 

                /s/ Michelle Stickles

                Michelle Stickles

Vice President , Asset Management 

February 27, 2015 

 

 

 

APPENDIX A 

 

 

 

 

SECURITIZED COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE LOANS 

OPERATING ADVISOR PLATFORM 

 

 

 

 

Trust Name

 

Morgan Stanley Capital I Series 2012 - C4 

 

 

 

 

 

 

PACIFIC LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY 

700 Newport Center Drive, Newport Beach , California 92660-6397 Tel (949)219 -3 011
§ 262.6 Landowner consent by the Secretary. The Secretary of the Interior, or delegate thereof, may, on behalf of the owner(s) of lands of Indian individuals, grant consent for the purposes in § 262.5(c)(1) and (3) when the Secretary or his or her delegate finds that such consent will not result in any injury to the land or owner(s) and when one or more of the following conditions exist: ( a ) The owner is a minor or a person *non compos mentis;*
( b ) The heirs or devisees of a deceased owner have not been determined;
( c ) The whereabouts of the owner are unknown;
( d ) Multiple owners are so numerous that the Secretary or his or her delegate finds, after documenting his or her efforts to do so, that it would be impractical to obtain their consent, as prescribed in § 262.5(c)(1)(iv) and provided the Secretary or his or her delegate also notifies, in writing, the tribe, if any, having jurisdiction over the land and allows 15 working days from the date of mailing date for response; or
( e ) The owner has given the Secretary or his or her delegate written authority to grant such consent on his or her behalf.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET OF INTERACTIVE MAGIC, INC. AS OF JUNE 30, 1998 AND
THE RELATED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND CASH FLOWS FOR THE SIX
MONTH PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<NAME>                        INTERACTIVE MAGIC
<CIK>                         0001061915
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000
       
<S>                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                        6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                  DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                       JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                             344
<SECURITIES>                                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      4,994
<ALLOWANCES>                                       0
<INVENTORY>                                        801
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   9,227
<PP&E>                                             1,092
<DEPRECIATION>                                     0 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     10,378
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              9,233
<BONDS>                                            0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              600
<PREFERRED>                                        86
<COMMON>                                           401
<OTHER-SE>                                         (5,476)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       10,378
<SALES>                                            8,735
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   8,735
<CGS>                                              1,572
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      9,637
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   18
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 608
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    (1,528)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       128
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                0
<DISCONTINUED>                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                       (1,656)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      (0.46)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      0
        

</TABLE>
#### § 173.22 Disposition of revenue.

Funds derived from concessions or leases under this part except those so derived from Indian tribal property withdrawn for irrigation purposes and for which the tribe has not been compensated, shall be available for expenditure under existing law in the operation and maintenance of the irrigation project on which collected and as provided for in part 161 of this chapter. Funds so derived from Indian tribal property withdrawn for irrigation purposes and for which the tribe has not been compensated, shall be deposited to the credit of the proper tribe.
# C_2006190EN.01000701.xml

| 12.8.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 190/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.8.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 190/7

---

Appeal brought on 26 April 2006 by Alecansan SL against the judgment of the Court of First Instance (First Chamber) delivered on 7 February 2006 in Case T-202/03: Alecansan SL v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)(OHIM)

(Case C-196/06 P)

(2006/C 190/11)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Appellant: Alecansan SL (represented by: P. Merino Baylos and A. Velázquez Ibáñez, abogados)

Appellant:

Other parties to the proceedings: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market, CompUSA Management Co.

Other parties to the proceedings:

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the judgment of 7 February 2006 (Case T-2002/03) of the First Chamber of the Court of First Instance dismissing the action for annulment filed against the Resolution dated 24 March 2003 of the First Appeal Chamber of the Office for Harmonisation of the Internal Market (OHIM) in case R-711/2002-1, dismissing the opposition filed by Alecansan SL against community trade mark application No 849.497 ‘COMPUSA’. |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the judgment of 7 February 2006 (Case T-2002/03) of the First Chamber of the Court of First Instance dismissing the action for annulment filed against the Resolution dated 24 March 2003 of the First Appeal Chamber of the Office for Harmonisation of the Internal Market (OHIM) in case R-711/2002-1, dismissing the opposition filed by Alecansan SL against community trade mark application No 849.497 ‘COMPUSA’.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The appellant submits that the Court of First Instance erred in its interpretation of article 8.1.b) of Regulations No 40/94 (1) when it found that there was no likelihood of confusion between the two marks on the grounds that, despite the high degree of similarity from a phonetic and a visual point of view, the goods and services of the trade mark applied for are not similar to the services covered by the appellant's mark. The appellant maintains that the Court of First Instance failed to take account of several important factors when determining the existence of the likelihood of confusion.

1

---

(1)  OJ L 11, 14.1.1994, p.1

1

---
EX-33.1
REPORT ON ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE

CoreLogic Commercial Real Estate Services, Inc. (the "Asserting Party"), an
indirect subsidiary of CoreLogic, Inc, is responsible for assessing compliance
as of December 31, 2013, and for the period from January 1, 2013 through
December 31, 2013 (the "Reporting Period") with the servicing criteria set forth
in Title 17, Sections 229.1122(d)(1)(iv), (d)(2)(v), (d)(2)(vi), (d)(2)(vii),
(d)(4)(xi), (d)(4)(xii) and (d)(4)(xiii) of the Code of Federal Regulations
applicable to the Asserting Party (the "Applicable Servicing Criteria"). The
servicing activities covered by this report include all loans for commercial
mortgage loan outsourcing customers for which the Asserting Party served as the
commercial tax service provider (the "Platform").

The Asserting Party has assessed its compliance with the Applicable Servicing
Criteria for the Reporting Period and has concluded that the Asserting Party has
complied, in all material respects, with the Applicable Servicing Criteria as of
December 31, 2013, and for the Reporting Period with respect to the Platform
taken as a whole.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm,
has issued an attestation report on the assessment of compliance with the
Applicable Servicing Criteria as of December 31, 2013, and for the Reporting
Period.

CORELOGIC COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE SERVICES, INC.


/s/ Vicki Chenault
Vicki Chenault,
Senior Vice President
February 14, 2014


Page 1 of 1
EX-31Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certifications.

 

 

I, HelaineM. Kaplan, certify that:

 

1. I havereviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this reporton Form 10-K of the COMM 2012-LC4 Mortgage Trust (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");

 

2. Basedon my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3. Basedon my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the periodcovered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

 

4. Basedon my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except asdisclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreementsin all material respects; and

 

5. All ofthe reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reportson assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordancewith Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, exceptas otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed inthis report on Form 10-K.

 

In givingthe certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:

 

Wells FargoBank, National Association, as Master Servicer, Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, as Special Servicer prior to May 31, 2018, KeyBankNational Association, as Special Servicer on and after May 31, 2018, CWCapital Asset Management LLC, as Special Servicer of theHartman Portfolio Mortgage Loan, U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee, Park Bridge Lender Services LLC, as Operating Advisor,CoreLogic Commercial Real Estate Services, Inc., as Servicing Function Participant, and National Tax Search, LLC, as ServicingFunction Participant.

 

 

 

Dated:October 25, 2019

 

 

/s/Helaine M. Kaplan

 

 

President

(seniorofficer in charge of securitization of the depositor)
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Readout of Secretary of Defense Lloyd J. Austin III's Call With Minister of National Defence Judith Collins of New Zealand

U.S. Department of Defense

Pentagon Press Secretary Maj. Gen. Ryder provided the following readout:

Secretary of Defense Lloyd J. Austin III spoke today with Minister of National Defence Judith Collins of New Zealand. The two leaders discussed both countries' shared defense and security priorities in the Indo-Pacific, underscoring the strength of the U.S.-New Zealand partnership.

The two officials discussed the regional security environment, with a focus on the Pacific Islands region, and explored areas for further collaboration and security cooperation. They also spoke about New Zealand's development and implementation of its 2023 Defense Policy and Strategy Statement, the Future Force Design Principles, and the upcoming defense capabilities report. They welcomed the alignment of these strategic documents with the 2022 U.S. National Defense Strategy.

Secretary Austin reaffirmed U.S. support for New Zealand's steadfast leadership in the Pacific Islands region as evidence of its commitment to a shared regional vision for a free and open Indo-Pacific.

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT
EPA Reg. No. 62097-12 

Vol. 1 – part 2 
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
Order entered October 3 , 2013

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 13

- 00327

- CR

BRANDON SCOTT BURKE, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 1

Dallas County, Texas Trial C ourt Cause No. F12

- 62602

- H



### O RDER

The Court REINSTATE S the appeal.

On August 26, 2013, we ordered the trial court to make findings regarding why the

reporter’s record had not been filed. On September 26, 2013, we received the reporter’s record.

Therefor e, in the interest of expediting the appeal, we VACATE the August 26, 2013 order

requiring findings.

Appellant’s brief is due within thirty days of the date of this order.

/s/ DAVID EVANS JUSTICE
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Final Report on the Reconstruction Finance Corporation

              																	United States. Department of the Treasury. 						*Final Report on the Reconstruction Finance Corporation : Pursuant to Section 6 (C), Reorganization Plan No. 1 of 1957*,										1959,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/134,			accessed on September 6, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
§ 171.555 What additional costs will I incur if I am granted a Payment Plan? You will incur the following costs: ( a ) An administrative fee to process your Payment Plan, as required by 31 CFR 901.9.
( b ) Interest, accrued on your unpaid balance, in accordance with § 171.545.
§ 292.22 How does the Secretary request the Governor's concurrence? If the Secretary makes a favorable Secretarial Determination, the Secretary will send to the Governor of the State: ( a ) A written notification of the Secretarial Determination and Findings of Fact supporting the determination;
( b ) A copy of the entire application record; and
( c ) A request for the Governor's concurrence in the Secretarial Determination.
#### Petition of JACK RONALD SEITZINGER, JR., for a Writ of Habeas Corpus.

No. 13867.

June 28, 1977.

565 P.2d 1004.

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

The petition of Jack Ronald Seitzinger, Jr. for a Writ of Habeas Corpus having been filed herein to test bailability pending appeal from his conviction,

And the Court having fully considered said petition, Exhibit A attached hereto, and the petitioner’s affidavit, and having determined that the district judge did not abuse his discretion in refusing the petitioner his release on bail after conviction and pending appeal,

IT IS ORDERED that said petition be denied and that a copy of this Order be mailed to petitioner.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  News & Policy 
-  Statements 
-  Statement On SFA Application Submitted By Bakery Drivers ... 

This page has not been translated. Please go to PBGC.gov's Spanish home page for more information available in Spanish.

Esta página no ha sido traducida. Por favor vaya a la página principal del sitio de español de PBGC para ver información disponible en español.

# Statement on SFA Application submitted by Bakery Drivers Local 550 Pension Fund

January 20, 2023

On September 28, 2022, the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation received an application for Special Financial Assistance (SFA) for the Bakery Drivers Local 550 and Industry Pension Fund (the “Plan”) requesting $132,250,472 in SFA.

PBGC determined that the Plan is not eligible for SFA because it does not meet the eligibility criteria under ERISA § 4262(b). Accordingly, PBGC has denied the application. Please see the denial letter for more information.
#### § 170.801 Can TTP funds designated on an FHWA-approved TTIP for maintenance be used to improve TTP transportation facilities?

No. The funds identified for maintenance on a FHWA-approved TTIP cannot be used to improve roads or other TTP transportation facilities to a higher road classification, standard or capacity.
**Exhibit 99.3**

 

**PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

In connection with this Annual Report of Sprott Physical Platinum and Palladium Trust (the “Trust”) on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2016 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) on or about the date hereof (the “Report”), I, John Wilson, Principal Executive Officer of Sprott Asset Management LP, the Manager of the Trust, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.

 

This certification is made solely for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and not for any other purpose.  A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Trust and will be retained by the Trust and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.

 

Date: March 23, 2017

 

 
|   | /s/ John Wilson             |
|--------|-----------------------------|
|   | John Wilson                 |
|   | Principal Executive Officer |

 

----