alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 5 (Friday, January 7, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 1151]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-42]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. NJ11-8-000]


City of Banning, CA; Notice of Filing

December 30, 2010.
    Take notice that on December 22, 2010, the City of Banning, 
California (Banning) filed its annual revisions to is Transmission 
Revenue Balancing Account Adjustment and a related modification to 
Appendix I to Banning's Transmission Owner Tariff (TO) and an update of 
the notification of Appendix II to Banning's TO Tariff, consistent with 
its TO filed in docket No. EL03-21-000 and the California Independent 
System Operator Corporation Electric Tariff.
    Banning also requests any necessary waivers by the Commission to 
allow this filing to be accepted for filing and approved by the 
Commission to become effective as of January 1, 2011.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, 
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. On or 
before the comment date, it is not necessary to serve motions to 
intervene or protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#55131007161a3b393c3b30062025253a272115333027367b323a23"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="286e6d7a6b67464441464d7b5d5858475a5c684e4d5a4b064f475e">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on January 21, 2011.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011-42 Filed 1-6-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### § 2.713 May I ask the AS-IA to take jurisdiction over the appeal?

No. The AS-IA will not consider a request from any interested party to take jurisdiction over the appeal.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

April 28, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
130080 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 130080 COA: 256302 Wayne CC: 04-002106-01 CHRISTOPHER DARNELL MOORE, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 18, 2005 judgment of the Court of Appeals is cons idered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

t0424 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

April 28, 2006

Clerk
HQ USINDOPACOM 

This brief is classified:

Discussion up to:

Classified by:

Derived from:

Declassify on:

JTF-Red Hill

Oil Pressure Door

13 April 2023

As of 11 1600 APR 2023

JTF Red Hill Plans Directorate

Multiple Sources

Enclosure 3

Markings Removed Markings Removed Markings Removed Markings Removed Markings Removed




Backups

CONTROLLED UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION

Enclosure 3

Markings Removed Markings Removed
#### § 226.34 Wells and tank batteries to be marked.

Lessee shall clearly and permanently mark all wells and tank batteries in a conspicuous place with number, legal description, operator, and telephone number, and shall take all necessary precautions to preserve these markings.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Employers & Practitioners 
-  Multiemployer Plans 
-  Multiemployer Pension Reform Act of 2014 

This page has not been translated. Please go to PBGC.gov's Spanish home page for more information available in Spanish.

Esta página no ha sido traducida. Por favor vaya a la página principal del sitio de español de PBGC para ver información disponible en español.

# Multiemployer Pension Reform Act of 2014

The Multiemployer Pension Reform Act of 2014 (MPRA) was enacted on December 16, 2014. In the new law, Congress established new options for trustees of multiemployer plans that will potentially run out of money.

Under MPRA, plan trustees of multiemployer plans can submit an application to the Treasury Department showing that proposed pension benefit reductions are necessary to keep a plan from running out of money.

**If the trustees do submit an application, PBGC continues to insure the plan, whether or not reductions occur**. See Multiemployer Insurance Program Facts.

### Kline-Miller Multiemployer Pension Reform Act of 2014

                          - Multiemployer Pension Reform Act of 2014 FAQs

### PBGC Partition Regulation

                          - Partition Regulation FAQs
                          - Multiemployer Pension Reform Act of 2014 Rule

### For Practitioners

                          - Partition FAQs for Practitioners
                          - Part 4233
                          - Model Notice for Plans Filing an Application for Partition Only
                          - Model Notice for Plans Filing Coordinated Applications for Partition and Suspension of Benefits

### For Participants

                          - Multiemployer Plans and Partition
                          - Multiemployer Plan Insolvency and Benefit Payments Q&A

November 30, 2017

##           Related Information      

                                  - Multiemployer Insurance Program Facts
                                  - Multiemployer Notices
### §3063. Covered agencies

For purposes of any provision of law referring to this section, the agencies named in this section are the following:

(1) The Department of Defense.

(2) The Department of the Army.

(3) The Department of the Navy.

(4) The Department of the Air Force.

(5) The Coast Guard.

(6) The National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

(Added and amended Pub. L. 116–283, div. A, title XVIII, §1807(c)(1), (2), Jan. 1, 2021, 134 Stat. 4157.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

The text of pars. (1) to (6) of section 2303(a) of this title, which were transferred to this section by Pub. L. 116–283, §1807(c)(2), was based on act Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 128; Pub. L. 85–568, title III, §301(b), July 29, 1958, 72 Stat. 432; Pub. L. 98–369, div. B, title VII, §2722(b)(1)(C), (D), July 18, 1984, 98 Stat. 1187.

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 3063 was renumbered section 7063 of this title.

#### Amendments

2021—Pars. (1) to (6). Pub. L. 116–283, §1807(c)(2), transferred pars. (1) to (6) of section 2303(a) of this title to this section.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section and amendment by Pub. L. 116–283 effective Jan. 1, 2022, with additional provisions for delayed implementation and applicability of existing law, see section 1801(d) of Pub. L. 116–283, set out as an Effective Date of 2021 Amendment note preceding section 3001 of this title.
IV

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 498

Supporting the Million Mom March.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 9, 2000

Mrs. MCCARTHY of New York (for herself, Mrs. MORELLA, Mrs. LOWEY, Mr.

SHAYS, Mr. PASCRELL, Mrs. JONES of Ohio, Mr. GILCHREST, Mr.

LEVIN, Mr. HORN, Mr. BLUMENAUER, Mr. BILBRAY, Mr. MORAN of Virginia, Mr. MEEHAN, Ms. DELAURO, Mrs. MALONEY of New York, Ms.

WOOLSEY, Ms. JACKSON-LEE of Texas, Ms. SCHAKOWSKY, Mr. BONIOR,

Ms. LEE, Ms. CARSON, Mr. UDALL of Colorado, Ms. MILLENDERMCDONALD, Mr. CONYERS, Mr. NADLER, and Ms. LOFGREN) submitted

the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

RESOLUTION

Supporting the Million Mom March.

Whereas on Mother’s Day—May 14, 2000—Americans will

be united in the Million Mom March;

Whereas the Million Mom March will occur on the National

Mall in the District of Columbia and at 63 other sites

across the Nation;

Whereas the purpose of the Million Mom March is to call

upon the President and the Congress to enact commonsense gun legislation;
2

•HRES 498 IH

Whereas 12 children in the United States are killed every day

by gun violence;

Whereas this gun violence has affected mothers, fathers,

other family members, and friends;

Whereas the mothers participating in the Million Mom March

have demonstrated their grassroots leadership to eliminate gun violence from the Nation’s schools and communities; and

Whereas on Mother’s Day and beyond, families, citizens,

members of religious congregations, schools, communitybased organizations, businesses, and political and cultural

groups will join together as a local and national community to recognize the affects of violence against our children from guns: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives—

2 (1) applauds the efforts of march founder

3 Donna Dees-Thomases and all the participants in

4 the Million Mom March;

5 (2) recognizes that the purpose of the Million

6 Mom March is to end gun violence and to urge the

7 Congress to enact commonsense gun legislation; and

8 (3) seeks to work with the organizers and par9 ticipants of the Million Mom March and all inter10 ested groups to make our communities safer by ap11 proving reasonable Federal gun safety legislation.

Æ
§ 38.15 Southwestern Indian Polytechnic Institute. ( a ) The Southwestern Indian Polytechnic Institute has an independent personnel system established under Public Law 105-337, the Administrative Systems Act of 1998, 112 Stat. 3171. The details of this system are in the Indian Affairs Manual (IAM) at Part 20. This manual system may be found in Bureau of Indian Affairs Regional and Agency Offices, Education Line Offices, and the Central Office in Washington, DC.
( b ) The personnel system is in the excepted service and addresses the areas of classification, staffing, pay, performance, discipline, and separation. Other areas of personnel such as leave, retirement, life insurance, health benefits, thrift savings, etc., remain under the jurisdiction of the Office of Personnel Management.
[65 FR 58183, Sept. 27, 2000]
[No. 5075.]

[No. 2642 C. A.]

#### Kirkwood, as Administrator of the Estate of McMahon, v. Palmer.

Courts — Appeals—Statutes.

Under §3, p. 109 of the Session Laws of 1891, an appeal lies to the district court from a judgment of the county court in an action concerning property alleged to belong to the estate of a decedent and wrongfully withheld. — P. 350.

*Appeal from the District Court of Summit County.*

*Eon. Frank W. Oiuers, Judge.*

Action by Thomas Kirkwood, administrator, against Isaac C. Palmer. Prom a judgment of the district cqurt dismissing an appeal from the county court, and from a judgment for defendant, plaintiff appeals.

*Reversed.*

Mr. James Glynn, for appellant.

•Mr. Justice Bailey

delivered the opinion of the court:

Appellant, who was plaintiff below, became involved in litigation in the county court concerning certain property alleged to belong to the estate and said to be wrongfully withheld by defendant.

In the county court judgment went against appellant and he appealed to the district court. After the appeal was taken defendant moved, “to dismiss this case because it was improperly appealed. ” This *350motion was sustained, the action dismissed and plaintiff prosecutes this appeal.

There is nothing in the motion nor in the court. proceedings to show wherein the case was improperly appealed.

Section 3, p. 109 of the Session Laws of 1891, in-force at the time this appeal was taken, provides for appeals to the district court in such cases, and an inspection of the record as reproduced in the abstract shows that the statutory provisions concerning appeals was complied with. Consequently, we conclude that the appeal was not improperly taken.

Therefore, the judgment will be reversed and the cause remanded to the district court for further proceedings.

n 7 *Reversed.*

Chief Justice Gabbert and Mr. Justice Goddard concur.
### §9233. Requirement of exemplary conduct

All commanding officers and others in authority in the Air Force and in the Space Force are required—

(1) to show in themselves a good example of virtue, honor, patriotism, and subordination;

(2) to be vigilant in inspecting the conduct of all persons who are placed under their command;

(3) to guard against and suppress all dissolute and immoral practices, and to correct, according to the laws and regulations of the Air Force or the Space Force, respectively, all persons who are guilty of them; and

(4) to take all necessary and proper measures, under the laws, regulations, and customs of the Air Force or the Space Force, respectively, to promote and safeguard the morale, the physical well-being, and the general welfare of the officers and enlisted persons under their command or charge.

(Added Pub. L. 105–85, div. A, title V, §507(b)(1), Nov. 18, 1997, 111 Stat. 1727, §8583; renumbered §9233, Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, §806(b)(7), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1832; amended Pub. L. 116–283, div. A, title IX, §923(c)(7), Jan. 1, 2021, 134 Stat. 3811.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2021—Pub. L. 116–283, §923(c)(7)(A), inserted "and in the Space Force" after "the Air Force" in introductory provisions.

Pars. (3), (4). Pub. L. 116–283, §923(c)(7)(B), inserted "or the Space Force, respectively" after "the Air Force".

2018—Pub. L. 115–232 renumbered section 8583 of this title as this section.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2018 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 115–232 effective Feb. 1, 2019, with provision for the coordination of amendments and special rule for certain redesignations, see section 800 of Pub. L. 115–232, set out as a note preceding section 3001 of this title.
#### § 20.7 Deadline dates.

The Manual is published on a schedule designed to provide the public with information about their Government on a timely basis. Therefore, agencies must comply with the deadline dates established by the Director of the Federal Register for transmittal of statements and charts and for the verification of proofs. Failure to do so may result in publication of an outdated statement or the omission of important material, thus depriving members of the public of information they have a right to expect in a particular edition of the Manual.
§ 1000.195 When must an affected Tribe/Consortium or Tribal organization raise the issue of a limitation or reduction of services, contracts, or funding for which it is eligible? ( a ) A Tribe/Consortium or Tribal organization may raise the issue of limitation or reduction of services, contracts, or funding for which it is eligible during: ( 1 ) Region-wide Tribal shares meetings occurring before the first year of implementation of an AFA;
( 2 ) Within the 90-day review period before the effective date of the AFA; and
( 3 ) The first year of implementation of an AFA.
( b ) Any Tribe/Consortium or Tribal organization claiming a limitation or reduction of contracts, services, or funding for which it is eligible must notify, in writing, both the Department and negotiating Tribe/Consortium. Claims may only be filed within the periods specified in paragraph (a) of this section.
### §8582. Deferred annuity policy required

Each civilian member, as a part of his contract of employment, shall carry, during his employment, a deferred annuity policy, having no cash surrender or loan provision, in a joint-stock life insurance corporation that is incorporated under the laws of a State and has a charter restriction that its business must be conducted without profit to its stockholders.

(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 439, §7082; renumbered §8582, Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, §807(c)(1), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1836.)

| Revised section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 7082 | 34 U.S.C. 1073. | Jan. 16, 1936, ch. 3, §1, 49 Stat. 1092. |

The words "whose employment commences from and after the date of approval of this act" are omitted as surplusage. Under §4 of the Act, members already employed when the Act was approved were given 60 days in which to decide whether or not they wished to participate in the benefits provided by the Act. Those who chose not to participate are excluded from the application of this chapter by §7081 of this title.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 8582, act Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 531, provided that a retired officer has no right to command except when on active duty, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 96–513, title II, §211, Dec. 12, 1980, 94 Stat. 2885, effective Sept. 15, 1981. See section 750 of this title.

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–232 renumbered section 7082 of this title as this section.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2018 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 115–232 effective Feb. 1, 2019, with provision for the coordination of amendments and special rule for certain redesignations, see section 800 of Pub. L. 115–232, set out as a note preceding section 3001 of this title.
### §9841. Payment of small amounts to public creditors

When authorized by the Secretary of the Air Force, a disbursing official of Air Force or Space Force subsistence funds may keep a limited amount of those funds in the personal possession and at the risk of the disbursing official to pay small amounts to public creditors.

(Added Pub. L. 97–258, §2(b)(14)(B), Sept. 13, 1982, 96 Stat. 1058; amended Pub. L. 116–283, div. A, title IX, §923(e)(24), Jan. 1, 2021, 134 Stat. 3820.)

| Revised section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 9841 | 31:493. | Mar. 2, 1907, ch. 2511 (proviso on p. 1166), 34 Stat. 1166. |

The words "Secretary of the Air Force" are substituted for "Secretary of War" because of sections 205(a) and 207(a) and (f) of the Act of July 26, 1947 (ch. 343, 61 Stat. 501, 502), and sections 1 and 53 of the Act of August 10, 1956 (ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 157, 488, 676). For comparable provisions that apply to the Army, see the revision note for 10:4841.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2021—Pub. L. 116–283 inserted "or Space Force" after "official of Air Force".
# C_2014003EN.01000701.xml

| 8.1.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 3/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.1.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 3/7

---

Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries

2014/C 3/07

In accordance with Article 35(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), a decision has been taken to close the fishery as set down in the following table:

1

| Date and time of closure | 10.12.2013 |
| --- | --- |
| Duration | 10.12.2013-31.12.2013 |
| Member State | Belgium |
| Stock or group of stocks | SRX/07D. |
| Species | Skates and rays (Rajiformes) |
| Zone | EU waters of VIId |
| Type(s) of fishing vessels | — |
| Reference number | 84/TQ39 |

Date and time of closure

10.12.2013

Duration

10.12.2013-31.12.2013

Member State

Belgium

Stock or group of stocks

SRX/07D.

Species

Skates and rays (Rajiformes)

Rajiformes

Zone

EU waters of VIId

Type(s) of fishing vessels

—

Reference number

84/TQ39

---

(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.

1

---
### §9345. Restoration to former grade: retired warrant officers and enlisted members

Each retired warrant officer or enlisted member of the Air Force or the Space Force who has been advanced on the retired list to a higher commissioned grade under section 9344 of this title, and who applies to the Secretary of the Air Force within three months after his advancement, shall, if the Secretary approves, be restored on the retired list to his former warrant-officer or enlisted status, as the case may be.

(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 555, §8965; Pub. L. 100–180, div. A, title V, §512(d)(3), Dec. 4, 1987, 101 Stat. 1090; Pub. L. 100–456, div. A, title XII, §1233(i)(2)(A), Sept. 29, 1988, 102 Stat. 2058; renumbered §9345 and amended Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, §§806(b)(14), 809(a), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1833, 1840; Pub. L. 116–283, div. A, title IX, §923(c)(21)(B), Jan. 1, 2021, 134 Stat. 3812.)

| Revised section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 8965 | 10:1006. | June 29, 1948, ch. 708, §204, 62 Stat. 1086. |

The words "hereafter", "rank or", and "shall thereafter be deemed to be enlisted or warrant officer personnel, as appropriate, for all purposes" are omitted as surplusage. The words "three months from June 29, 1948" and "whichever is later" are omitted as executed.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 9345, added Pub. L. 105–85, div. A, title V, §542(c)(1), Nov. 18, 1997, 111 Stat. 1742; amended Pub. L. 106–65, div. A, title V, §535(c), Oct. 5, 1999, 113 Stat. 606; Pub. L. 109–364, div. A, title V, §531(c), Oct. 17, 2006, 120 Stat. 2199, related to exchange program with foreign military academies, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 114–328, div. A, title XII, §1248(b)(1), Dec. 23, 2016, 130 Stat. 2525.

Another prior section 9345, act Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 565, related to selection of Filipinos for instruction at the Air Force Academy, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 98–94, title X, §1004(c)(2), (d), Sept. 24, 1983, 97 Stat. 660, effective one year after Sept. 24, 1983.

A prior section 9345a, added Pub. L. 110–417, [div. A], title V, §541(c)(1), Oct. 14, 2008, 122 Stat. 4456; amended Pub. L. 113–291, div. A, title V, §553(c), Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3377, related to foreign and cultural exchange activities, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 114–328, div. A, title XII, §1248(b)(1), Dec. 23, 2016, 130 Stat. 2525.

#### Amendments

2021—Pub. L. 116–283 inserted "or the Space Force" after "member of the Air Force".

2018—Pub. L. 115–232 renumbered section 8965 of this title as this section and substituted "section 9344" for "section 8964".

1988—Pub. L. 100–456 substituted "retired" for "Regular Air Force" in section catchline.

1987—Pub. L. 100–180 struck out "Regular" before "Air Force who".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2018 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 115–232 effective Feb. 1, 2019, with provision for the coordination of amendments and special rule for certain redesignations, see section 800 of Pub. L. 115–232, set out as a note preceding section 3001 of this title.