alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# **EXHIBIT 32.2**

# ** **

**CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORTS**

 

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, theundersigned officer of The Doe Run Resources Corporation (the ‘‘Company’’),does hereby certify that:

 

The quarterly report on Form 10-Qfor the quarter ended April 30, 2005, of the Company as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, and information contained in the quarterly report on Form 10-Qfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 

Date: June 14, 2005

 

 
| By:                     | /s/ David A. Chaput |   |
|-------------------------|---------------------|--------|
| David A. Chaput         |
| Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
#### § 213.9 Noncontiguous tracts.

No lease will be approved covering two or more noncontiguous tracts of land, but in such case a lease must be executed on each separate tract.
#### § 217.2 Authority and purpose.

In accordance with the Ute Partition Act approved August 27, 1954 (68 Stat. 868; 25 U.S.C. 677-677aa), as amended by the Act of August 2, 1956 (70 Stat. 936), and the Act of September 25, 1962 (76 Stat. 597), assets shall be managed jointly by the business committee and the board of directors. These regulations set out the procedures for exercising such joint management.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-13-00476-CR

Joshoa Immanuel PEREZ,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 19th Judicial District Court, McLennan County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2011-2093-C1

Honorable George Allen, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE ANGELINI, JUSTICE ALVAREZ, AND JUSTICE CHAPA

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgment is 

AFFIRMED.

SIGNED July 23, 2014.

_____________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# U.S. and Japan Conduct Bilateral Air Exercise

U.S. Forces Japan

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command B-1 Lancer bombers and F-16 Fighting Falcon fighters conducted a bilateral exercise with Japan Air Self-Defense Force F-2 aircraft on Nov. 5 (JST) to showcase deterrent capabilities while demonstrating our nations' interoperability.

This exercise was conducted to demonstrate our high levels of force readiness, close coordination, and credible deterrent capacity. The U.S. and Japan remain committed to peace and prosperity through the region in order to secure a free and open Indo-Pacific.

The U.S. commitment to the defense of Japan remains ironclad.

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT
### TO: Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

FROM: Patrick Goodwin , ERG

DATE: September 30

, 2015

SUBJECT: Index for Supporting Documentation for the National Scale Immediate

Receiving Water Model [DCN SE04556 ]

This document serves as the index for the supporting documentation for the National Scale Immediate Receiving Water (IRW) Model , developed as part of the Environmental Assessment for the Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Source Category (EA Report), Document No. EPA

- 821

- R

- 15

- 006 (DCN SE04527) . The supporting documentation for this model includes the files listed in Table 1.

Ta ble 1. Supporting Documentation

Attachment ID Document Name Brief Description

A1 Attachment 1: CBI_Final Steam EA IRW

Model

- Wildlife and Human Health Module

- Comparison Database

- Option A (CCR)

- DCN SE04556A1 CBI_Database used to compare the wildlif e and human health module results between baseline and Option A. Generates inputs for the Wildlife Summary Table Generator and the Human Health Summary Table Generator. This version accounts for the CCR rulemaking.

A2 Attachment 2 : CBI_Final Steam EA IRW

Model

- Wildlife and Human Health Module

- Comparison Database

- Option B (CCR)

- DCN SE04556A2 CBI_Database used to compare the wildlife and human health module results between baseline and Option B. Generates inputs for the Wildlife Summary Table Generator and the Human Health Summary Table Generator. This version accounts for the CCR rulemaking.

A3 Attachment 3 : CBI_Final Steam EA IRW

Model

- Wildlife and Human Health Module

- Comparison Database

- Option C (CCR)

- DCN SE04556A3 CBI_Database used to compare the wildlife an d human health module results between baseline and Option C. Generates inputs for the Wildlife Summary Table Generator and the Human Health Summary Table Generator. This version accounts for the CCR rulemaking.

A4 Attachment 4 : CBI_Final Steam EA I RW

Model

- Wildlife and Human Health Module

- Comparison Database

- Option D (CCR)

- DCN SE04556A4 CBI_Database used to compare the wildlife and human health module results between baseline and Option D. Generates inputs for the Wildlife Summary Table Generator and the Human Health Summary Table Generator. This version accounts for the CCR rulemaking.

A 5 Attachment 5 : CBI_Final Steam EA IRW

Model

- Wildlife and Human Health Module

- Comparison Database

- Option E (CCR)

- DCN SE04556A5 CBI_Database used to compare the wildlife and hu man health module results between baseline and Option E. Generates inputs for the Wildlife Summary Table Generator and the Human Health Summary Table Generator. This version accounts for the CCR rulemaking.
U.S. Department of 

Transportation 

Office of the Secretary of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

Washington, DC 20590 

Mr. Mark Atwood 

Issue date: July 21, 2014 

Cozen O'Connor Authority expires: July 31,2014 

The Army and Navy Building, Suite 1100 

1627 I St. NW 

Washington, DC 20006 

REVISED NOTICE OF CONSISTENCY1 

Kalitta Air, LLC 

is a properly certificated carrier that holds authority to conduct charter operations to and from China. Based on 

a proposal submitted by the carrier, we have determined that the operations comply with the applicable 

Department regulations and the provisions of the 2013-2014 U.S.-China Protocol. 

Number of Flights: one (1) one-way charter2 

Flight Date(s): July 28-29, 2014 

Points: Shanghai (PVG) -Anchorage (ANC)* -Chicago (ORD) 

Equipment: Boeing 7 4 7 

The U.S. carrier operating the above charter flight should report, in writing, to the U.S. Air Carrier Licensing 

Division (X-44), Office oflntemational Aviation, Department of Transportation, on its operation for the 

preceding month by the tenth of each month whether the flights operated. This notice is valid only for the flight 

contained in the above program. 

* Denotes technical stop only. 

An electronic version of this document is available on the World Wide Web at: 

www.regulations.gov 

1 This Notice of Consistency (NOC) revises the NOC dated July 18,2013 to exclude the Chicago (ORD)- New York (JFK) leg and 

change of equipment from 747F-200F to 747. 2 Following our grant ofKalitta Air LLC's request for one (1) one-way charter allocations, 28 one-way charter allocations remain 

available in the Zone 1 charter pool for the 2013/14 charter year. Kalitta notified us that it cancelled the charter flight authorized to 

operate on July 19, 2014 and returned that flight to the charter pool.
Editorial Note on Part 224
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 224 appear at 84 FR 69611, Dec. 18, 2019.

§ 224.139 What must a Tribe do after receiving a notice of imminent jeopardy to a physical trust asset? ( a ) Upon receipt of a notice of imminent jeopardy to a physical trust asset, the Tribe must cease specific conduct outlined in the notice or take specific action the Secretary orders that is necessary to correct any condition causing the imminent jeopardy; and
( b ) Within 5 days of receiving a notice of imminent jeopardy to a physical trust asset, the Tribe must submit a written response to the Secretary that: ( 1 ) Responds to the Secretary's finding that the Tribe has failed to comply with a Federal law or the terms of the TERA;
( 2 ) Responds to the Secretary's finding of imminent jeopardy to a physical trust asset;
( 3 ) Describes the status of the Tribe's cessation of specific conduct or specific action the Tribe has taken to correct any condition causing imminent jeopardy to a physical trust asset; and
( 4 ) Describes what further actions, if any, the Tribe proposes to take to correct any condition, cited in the notice, causing imminent jeopardy to a physical trust asset.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

January 24, 2022

No. 04-21-00024-CV

FFGGP, INC., as trustee of the Windward Trace 9131 Land Trust,

Appellant

v.

MTGLQ INVESTORS, LP, Rushmore Loan Management Services, LLC, and U.S. Bank 

National Association, as trustee of TIKI Series IV Trust,

Appellees

From the 166th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2020-CI-02266

Honorable John D. Gabriel, Jr., Judge Presiding

O R D E R

On January 18, 2022, this court granted appellees’ motion for substitution of counsel. On 

January 24, 2021, appellees filed a joint motion to withdraw motion for substitution of counsel 

and motion to vacate order granting motion for substitution of counsel. The motion is 

GRANTED, and we withdraw our prior order dated January 18, 2022.

_________________________________

Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 24th day of January, 2022.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court
The data collected in this survey are provided by institutions in accordance 

with the EADA and may not be the same as data used for determining 

compliance with other Federal or state laws, including Title IX of the Education 

Amendments of 1972.
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-18-00415-CR

Christian Omar Stowe

v.

The State of Texas

On Appeal from the

24th District Court of Victoria County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 16-12-29737-A

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be AFFIRMED. The Court 

orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

June 27, 2019
### §1078. Medical and dental care for dependents: charges

(a) The Secretary of Defense, after consulting the other administering Secretaries, shall prescribe fair charges for inpatient medical and dental care given to dependents under section 1076 of this title. The charge or charges prescribed shall be applied equally to all classes of dependents.

(b) As a restraint on excessive demands for medical and dental care under section 1076 of this title, uniform minimal charges may be imposed for outpatient care. Charges may not be more than such amounts, if any, as the Secretary of Defense may prescribe after consulting the other administering Secretaries, and after a finding that such charges are necessary.

(c) Amounts received for subsistence and medical and dental care given under section 1076 of this title shall be deposited to the credit of the appropriation supporting the maintenance and operation of the facility furnishing the care.

(Added Pub. L. 85–861, §1(25)(B), Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1448; amended Pub. L. 89–614, §2(5), Sept. 30, 1966, 80 Stat. 863; Pub. L. 96–513, title V, §511(36), Dec. 12, 1980, 94 Stat. 2923; Pub. L. 98–557, §19(6), Oct. 30, 1984, 98 Stat. 2869.)

| Revised section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1078(a)1078(b)1078(c) | 37:403(c).37:403(d).37:403(e). | June 7, 1956, ch. 374, §103(c)(d), (e), 70 Stat. 251. |

1078(b)

1078(c)

37:403(d).

37:403(e).

Appropriate references are made to dental care throughout the section to reflect the fact that in certain limited situations, dependents are entitled to dental care under 37:403(h)(4), restated as section 1077(d) of this title.

In subsection (b), the word "special" is omitted as surplusage.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 1078, act Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 84, prescribed instructions for marking ballots, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 85–861, §36B(5), Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1570, as superseded by the Federal Voting Assistance Act of 1955 which is classified to subchapter I–D (§1973cc et seq.) of chapter 20 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare.

#### Amendments

1984—Subsecs. (a), (b). Pub. L. 98–557 substituted reference to other administering Secretaries for reference to Secretary of Health and Human Services.

1980—Subsecs. (a), (b). Pub. L. 96–513 substituted "Secretary of Health and Human Services" for "Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare".

1966—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 89–614 substituted "The charge or charges prescribed shall be applied equally to all classes of dependents" for "Charges shall be the same for all dependents".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1980 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 96–513 effective Dec. 12, 1980, see section 701(b)(3) of Pub. L. 96–513, set out as a note under section 101 of this title.

#### Effective Date of 1966 Amendment

For effective date of amendment by Pub. L. 89–614, see section 3 of Pub. L. 89–614, set out as a note under section 1071 of this title.
Editorial Note on Part 23
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 23 appear at 79 FR 27190, May 13, 2014.

§ 23.124 What actions must a State court undertake in voluntary proceedings? ( a ) The State court must require the participants in a voluntary proceeding to state on the record whether the child is an Indian child, or whether there is reason to believe the child is an Indian child, as provided in § 23.107.
( b ) If there is reason to believe the child is an Indian child, the State court must ensure that the party seeking placement has taken all reasonable steps to verify the child's status. This may include contacting the Tribe of which it is believed the child is a member (or eligible for membership and of which the biological parent is a member) to verify the child's status. As described in § 23.107, where a consenting parent requests anonymity, a Tribe receiving such information must keep relevant documents and information confidential.
( c ) State courts must ensure that the placement for the Indian child complies with §§ 23.129-23.132.
`[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 360 Reported in House (RH)]






                                                 House Calendar No. 151
106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 360

                          [Report No. 106-445]

Agreeing to the conference requested by the Senate on the amendment of 
   the Senate to the bill (H.R. 3194) making appropriations for the 
government of the District of Columbia and other activities chargeable 
 in whole or in part against revenues of said District for the fiscal 
        year ending September 30, 2000, and for other purposes.


_______________________________________________________________________


                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            November 3, 1999

    Mr. Linder, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION


 
Agreeing to the conference requested by the Senate on the amendment of 
   the Senate to the bill (H.R. 3194) making appropriations for the 
government of the District of Columbia and other activities chargeable 
 in whole or in part against revenues of said District for the fiscal 
        year ending September 30, 2000, and for other purposes.

    Resolved, That the House disagrees to the Senate amendment to the 
bill (H.R. 3194) making appropriations for the government of the 
District of Columbia and other activities chargeable in whole or in 
part against revenues of said District for the fiscal year ending 
September 30, 2000, and for other purposes, and agrees to the 
conference requested by the Senate thereon.
                                     





                                                 House Calendar No. 151

106th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                              H. RES. 360

                          [Report No. 106-445]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

Agreeing to the conference requested by the Senate on the amendment of 
   the Senate to the bill (H.R. 3194) making appropriations for the 
government of the District of Columbia and other activities chargeable 
 in whole or in part against revenues of said District for the fiscal 
        year ending September 30, 2000, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                            November 3, 1999

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed`
#### § 1000.318 When will the Secretary return management of a reassumed program?

A reassumed program may be included in future AFAs, but the Secretary may include conditions in the terms of the AFA to ensure that the circumstances that caused jeopardy to attach do not reoccur.
EX-10.11





 Exhibit 10.11 

NETTAR GROUP INC. 

April 5, 2021 
 Hannover Holdings SA 

58 rue Charles Martel 
 L-2134, Luxembourg 

Re: Side Letter Agreement 
 Reference is
made to the Amended and Restated Note Purchase Agreement, dated September 9, 2019, by and among Nettar Group Inc. (the “Company”), Hannover Holdings SA (“Hannover”), and the other lenders party thereto, as amended from time to
time (the “Note Purchase Agreement”), and to the promissory notes issued to Hannover thereunder (the ‘‘Notes”). Capitalized terms not otherwise defined herein shall have the meaning ascribed to them in the Note Purchase
Agreement. 
 The Company is proposing to extend the Final Maturity Date of the Notes to April 30, 2022, through Amendment No. 4 to Amended and
Restated Note Purchase Agreement (the “Amendment”), a draft of which has been provided to Hannover. In such connection, as an inducement to Hannover to enter into the Amendment, the Company hereby grants Hannover the right to nominate a
person to serve as director of the Company or its successor, pursuant to the terms of this Side Letter Agreement. 
 Following the consummation of a Going
Public Transaction and so long as Hannover holds at least 4% of the outstanding shares of the Company or its successor that is publicly traded following such Going Public Transaction, Hannover shall have the right to nominate a person of its choice,
reasonably acceptable to the Company (or its successor), to serve on the board of directors of such public company as of the date of the consummation of such Going Public Transaction as director, subject to compliance with the independence
requirements of Rule 5605 of The Nasdaq Stock Market; provided that such person agrees to be bound by such confidentiality, insider trading and other policies applicable to directors of such public company as adopted by the board of directors
of such public company. The Company shall take all necessary actions, to promptly appoint such person nominated by Hannover as a director of the Company or its successor as of the consummation of such Going Public Transaction, subject to the above
conditions. Hannover shall timely provide to the Company all information reasonably requested by the Company with respect to such person. 
 Sections 7.1,
7.2, 7.3, 7.4 and 7.6 of the Note Purchase Agreement are incorporated herein by reference. 
 [Signature page follows] 












 
			
	NETTAR GROUP INC.
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Emiliano Kargieman

	Name:	 	Emiliano Kargieman
	Title:	 	
	
	HANNOVER HOLDINGS S.A.
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Giovanni Dell’Orto

	Name:	 	Giovanni Dell’Orto
	Title:	 	DIRECTOR - PRESIDENT



  
 2
### UNPUBLISHED



# UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT



#  E UGENE R. D ANIELS ,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v. H. M OORE , Lieutenant; M. B ROWN , No. 02-6624



#  Correctional Officer; A. S MITH , Correctional Officer; S COTT J OHNSON , Grievance Clerk,

Defendants-Appellees. 

# 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Margaret B. Seymour, District Judge.

(CA-01-583-9) Submitted: May 30, 2002 Decided: June 19, 2002 Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Vacated and remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion.

COUNSELEugene R. Daniels, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Thomas King, Jay Hupfer, WILLCOX, BUYCK & WILLIAMS, P.A., Florence, South Carolina, for Appellees.Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

OPINION
PER CURIAM:Eugene R. Daniels appeals from the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2001) complaint for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. The Prison Litigation Reform Act ("PLRA") requires that a prisoner exhaust administrative remedies before filing a § 1983 action concerning his confinement. 42 U.S.C.A. § 1997e(a) (West Supp. 2001). In Booth v. Churner , 532 U.S. 731 (2001), the Supreme Court held that the PLRA requires a prisoner to exhaust administrative remedies regarding hisexcessive force claims, even if the prisoner seeks only money damages and such relief is not available under the administrative process. Id. at 741. More recently, in Porter v. Nussle , 534 U.S. 516, 122 S. Ct. 983 (2002), the Supreme Court held that the PLRA’s exhaustion requirement applies to all inmate suits about prison life, whether they involve general circumstances or particular episodes, and whether they allege excessive force or some other wrong. 534 U.S. at ___, 122 S. Ct. at 992. There is evidence in the record that Daniels pursued administrative remedies and it is not clear from the district court’s opinion whether the district court considered this evidence. Therefore, although we express no opinion as to whether Daniels in fact has demonstrated exhaustion of administrative remedies, we vacate the district court’s order dismissing the action without prejudice and remand to enable the district court to make such a determination. We dispense with oralargument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
VACATED AND REMANDED 2 D ANIELS v. M OORE