alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 170.616 How are payments made to Tribes if additional funds are available?

After an Agreement between BIA or FHWA and the Tribe is executed, any additional funds will be made available to Tribes under the terms of the executed Agreement.
152 So.2d 430

#### Thomas WILLIAMS v. STATE.

3 Div. 63.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

April 11, 1963.

Thomas Williams pro se.

Richmond M. Flowers, Atty. Gen., and John C. Tyson, III, Asst. Atty. Gen., opposed.

HARWOOD, Justice.

Petition of Thomas Williams for certiorari to the Court of Appeals to review and revise the judgment and decision in Williams v. State, Ala.App., 152 So.2d 429.

Writ denied.

LIVINGSTON, C. J., and SIMPSON and MERRILL, JJ., concur.
### §7153. Commissioned officers: appointment without specification of branch; transfer between branches

(a) Appointments in commissioned grades in the Regular Army shall be made without specification of branch except in each of the special branches and as professors or director of admissions of the United States Military Academy.

(b) Commissioned officers appointed in the Regular Army without specification of branch shall be assigned, and may be transferred and reassigned, by the Secretary of the Army to branches other than the special branches, according to their professional qualifications and the needs of the Army.

(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 181, §3283; Pub. L. 85–600, §1(4), Aug. 6, 1958, 72 Stat. 522; Pub. L. 95–485, title VIII, §820(d)(1), Oct. 20, 1978, 92 Stat. 1627; Pub. L. 95–551, §2, Oct. 30, 1978, 92 Stat. 2069; renumbered §7153, Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, §808(b)(3), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1838.)

| Revised section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 3283(a) 3283(b) | 10:506(b) (2d sentence).10:506(c) (1st sentence).10:506(c) (less 1st sentence and less proviso). | Aug. 7, 1947, ch. 512, §502(b) (2d sentence), (c) (less proviso), 61 Stat. 884; June 12, 1948, ch. 449, §104(d)(1), 62 Stat. 358. |

3283(b)

10:506(c) (1st sentence).

10:506(c) (less 1st sentence and less proviso).

Subsection (a) is substituted for 10:506(b) (2d sentence) and 506(c) (1st sentence). The words "in each of the special branches" are substituted for the enumeration of branches in 10:506(b) (2d sentence) and for the words "each of the several corps of the Army Medical Service, as chaplains", in 10:506(c).

In subsection (b), the words "other than the special branches and the Women's Army Corps" are substituted for 10:506(c) (words between 3d and 4th parentheses). The word "their" is substituted for the words "of the officers concerned". The words "of the Army" are substituted for the words "of the branches, arms, and services". The words "from time to time" and "arms, and services" are omitted as surplusage.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–232 renumbered section 3283 of this title as this section.

1978—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 95–551 substituted "director of admissions" for "registrar".

Pub. L. 95–485 struck out ", in the Women's Army Corps," after "special branches".

Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 95–485 struck out "and the Women's Army Corps" after "special branches".

1958—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 85–600 inserted reference to registrar of the Military Academy.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2018 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 115–232 effective Feb. 1, 2019, with provision for the coordination of amendments and special rule for certain redesignations, see section 800 of Pub. L. 115–232, set out as a note preceding section 3001 of this title.
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Jobs for Which You Probably Will Need a College Education

              																	United States. Bureau of Labor Statistics. 						*Jobs for Which You Probably Will Need a College Education*,										May 1980,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/862,			accessed on September 21, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
DISMISS and Opinion Filed December 7, 2018 

# S

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05-18-00565-CV VERNAESHA COMPTON AND SH EILA COMPTON, Appellants V. DALLAS HOUSING AUTHORITY, Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 4 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC-18-01611-D



### MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Francis , Stoddart, and Schenck Opinion by Justice Francis This is an appeal from the trial court’s judgment in a forcible detainer action. Appellants were cautioned on October 18, 2018 that the appeal would be dis missed unless they filed their brief within ten days, but they have failed to file their brief

. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 38.8(a)(1). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. See id. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b), (c).

180565F.P05 /Molly Francis/ MOLLY FRANCIS JUSTICE–2– 

# S

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT

VERNAESHA COMPTON AND SHEILA COMPTON, Appellants
No. 05-18-00565-CV V. DALLAS HOUSING AUTHORITY, Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 4, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC-18-01611-D. Opinion delivered by Justice Francis. Justices Stoddart and Sch enck participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appe al is DISMISSED

. Judgment entered December 7, 2018.
# C_2006156EN.01000601.xml

| 5.7.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 156/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.7.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 156/6

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4184 — Boeing/Carmen)

(2006/C 156/03)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 6 June 2006, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition web site (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes. |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition web site (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes.

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4184. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://ec.europa.eu/eur-lex/lex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4184. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://ec.europa.eu/eur-lex/lex)

---
CIBO Startup Survey Summary

5/2/2014

Boiler Type Startup Fuel Primary Fuel Control

Responses 

Received (# 

units)

Avg hours to come 

online after first 

startup fuel ignition

Avg time to reach 

25% load after first 

startup fuel ignition

Avg time to reach 

stable operation 

after 25% load is 

reached

Avg hours to come 

online after first 

startup fuel 

ignition

Avg time to reach 

25% load after 

first startup fuel 

ignition

Avg time to reach 

stable operation 

after 25% load is 

reached

Avg hours to come 

online after first 

startup fuel 

ignition

Avg time to reach 

25% load after 

first startup fuel 

ignition

Avg time to reach 

stable operation 

after 25% load is 

reached

Circulating FBC Natural gas

Coal or 

coal/biomass Baghouse 20 4.5-31 0.1-4 1-26 4.4-18 0.1-4 2.1-24 0.6-4 0.4-4 1-13

Bubbling FBC Natural gas Coal Baghouse 3 6 1 1 4 1 1 2-4 1 1

Baghouse 2 1-6.5 0.1-4 1.4-4 no response no response no response no response no response no response

ESP 11 5.5-36 0-3 0-5 5.5-16 0.1-1 0-9 3.5-9 0.1-1 0-4.7

Coal Baghouse 7 1-8 0.025-5 0.5-8 1-6 0.039-6 0.5-6 0.5-5 0.017-5 0.5-4

Biomass Baghouse 1 24 1 1 24 1 1 8 1 1

Coal ESP 6 4.5-10 0-1 0-3 5-8 1 1 4-7 1 1

Biomass ESP 11 4-24 0.5-2 0.5-6.17 4-24 0.5-1 0.5-2.8 2-8 0.5-1 0.5-2

Biomass Scrubber 5 4.5-6.5 0.5-1 0.5-2 4.5-6.5 0.5-1 0.5-2 4.5-6.5 0.5-1 0.5-2

Hot Start Data

Pulverized Coal Gas or #2 oil Coal

Stoker

oil, oil soaked 

rags, other 

solid fuel

Offline for ≥120 hours prior to initial Offline for 25-119 hours prior to initial lightoff Offline for ≤24 hours prior to initial lightoff

Cold Startup Data Warm Start Data

EPA Proposed Time Periods for EGUs

Cold Startup Warm Start Hot Start
# C_2013065EN.01001401.xml

| 6.3.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 65/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.3.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 65/14

---

Commission communication pursuant to Article 17(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community

Invitation to tender in respect of the operation of scheduled air services in accordance with public service obligations

2013/C 65/06

| Member State | United Kingdom |
| --- | --- |
| Concerned routes | Glasgow–Campbeltown
  Glasgow–Tiree
  Glasgow–Barra |
| Period of validity of the contract | From 1 April 2013 to 31 March 2015 |
| Deadline for submission of applications and tenders | Two months after the date of publication of this notice |
| Address from which the text of the invitation to tender and any relevant information and/or documentation relating to the public tender and the public service obligation can be obtained | Transport Scotland |
| Area 2G (N) |
| Victoria Quay |
| Edinburgh |
| EH6 6QQ |
| UNITED KINGDOM |
| Tel. +44 1312440854 |
| Fax +44 1312440463 |

Member State

United Kingdom

Concerned routes

Glasgow–Campbeltown

Glasgow–Tiree

Glasgow–Barra

Period of validity of the contract

From 1 April 2013 to 31 March 2015

Deadline for submission of applications and tenders

Two months after the date of publication of this notice

Address from which the text of the invitation to tender and any relevant information and/or documentation relating to the public tender and the public service obligation can be obtained

Transport Scotland

Area 2G (N)

Victoria Quay

Edinburgh

EH6 6QQ

UNITED KINGDOM

Tel. +44 1312440854

Fax +44 1312440463

Contact: Michael Bratcher, Policy Officer, Aviation Team

E-mail: Michael.Bratcher@transportscotland.gsi.gov.uk

---
§ 101.4 Applications. An applicant for a United States direct loan or a loan from a relending organization conducting a relending program under this part will submit an application on a form approved by the Commissioner. Applications shall include the name, current address and telephone number of the applicant(s); current and prior Taxpayer Identification Number—Employer Identification Number if a business entity, Social Security Number if an individual; and current employer's name, address, and telephone number; amount of the loan requested; purpose for which loan funds will be used; and security to be offered; period of the loan, assets, liabilities and repayment capacity of the applicant; budgets reflecting income and expenditures of the applicant; and any other information necessary to adequately evaluate the application. The borrower must sign a statement declaring no delinquency on Federal taxes or other Federal debt and borrower's good standing on dealings in procurement or non-procurement with the Federal Government. The Bureau will obtain a current credit bureau report and prescribe procedures to be used in handling loan proceeds. In addition, applications for loans to finance economic enterprises already in operation will be accompanied by: ( a ) A copy of operating statements, balance sheets and budgets for the prior two operating years or applicable period thereof preceding submittal of the application;
( b ) Current budget, balance sheet and operating statements; and
( c ) Pro forma budgets operating statements and balance sheets showing the estimated results for operating the enterprise for two years after injection of the loan funds into the operation.
A resume of the applicant's management experience will be submitted with the application. Applications for loans and requests for advance of tribal trust funds for relending under the provisions of this part shall be accompanied by a declaration of policy and plan of operation or other acceptable plan for conducting the program. Applications for loans or modifications thereof, to establish, acquire, operate, or expand an economic enterprise shall be accompanied by a plan of operation. Declarations of policy or other plans for conducting a relending program and plans of operation for economic enterprises require the approval of the Commissioner before becoming effective. An application from a corporation, partnership or cooperative association, for a United States direct loan or a loan under a relending program for financing an economic enterprise must, in addition to financial statements and budgets, include a copy of documents establishing the entity, or the proposed documents to be used in establishing it. [40 FR 3587, Jan. 23, 1975. Redesignated at 47 FR 13327, Mar. 30, 1982, as amended at 57 FR 46471, Oct. 8, 1992]
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT VICTORIA MISHUSTINA, Petitioner,
v. ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent. No. 05-70513 Agency No. A077-427-431
ORDER AND MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals Submitted August 16, 2010 ** Pasadena, California Before: PREGERSON, NOONAN, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges. ORDER The memorandum disposition filed on August 18, 2010 is withdrawn. The superseding disposition will be filed concu rrently with this order. All pending petitions are denied as moot. 

# FILED
NOV 13 2012 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 DISPOSITION Victoria Mishustina petitions for review of a final decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals denying her motion to reopen a proceeding in which she was denied asylum and withholding of rem oval under the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. §§ 1158, 1231(b)(3), and de nying her motion for reinstatement of voluntary departure, pursuant to 8 U.S.C . § 1229c. We review the BIA’s order denying Mishustina’s motion to reopen for a buse of discretion; we review purely legal questions de novo. Iturribarria v. INS , 321 F.3d 889, 894 (9th Cir. 2003). We grant Mishustina’s petition for review and remand. The BIA abused its discretion in finding that Mishustina had not demonstrated a substantial likelihood that she would qualify for asylum, thereby qualifying for the regulatory exception to the normal requirement that a motion to reopen must be filed within ninety days after the final decision of the BIA. See 8 C.F.R. §§ 1003.2(c)(2), 1003.2(c)(3)(ii) (exception to the 90-day requirement where there are “changed circumstances aris ing in the country of nationality . . . if such evidence is material and was not available and could not have been discovered or presented at the previous hearing”). Mishustina’s petition for review also suggests that the BIA abused its discretion in refusing to reinstate her volunt ary departure. We lack jurisdiction to3 review the BIA’s decision to grant or deny a request for voluntary departure. Garcia v. Ashcroft , 368 F.3d 1157, 1159 (9th Cir. 2004) (order). We grant Mishustina’s petition for review and remand to the BIA with instructions to remand the case to the Immigration Court. GRANTED and REMANDED
.
§ 21.16 Required document headings. ( a ) Each rule and proposed rule document submitted to the Office of the Federal Register shall contain the following headings, when appropriate, on separate lines in the following order: ( 1 ) Agency name;
( 2 ) Subagency name;
( 3 ) Numerical references to the CFR title and parts affected;
( 4 ) Agency numbers of identifying symbol in brackets, if used;
( 5 ) Brief subject heading describing the document.
( b ) Each CFR section in the regulatory text of the document shall have a brief descriptive heading, preceding the text, on a separate line.
[50 FR 12468, Mar. 28, 1985]
###### Editorial Note on Part 224

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 224 appear at 84 FR 69611, Dec. 18, 2019.

#### § 224.170 What is the purpose of this subpart?

This subpart explains the process and requirements under which a Tribe may rescind a TERA and therefore return to the Secretary all authority and activities assumed under that TERA.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS

NO. 00-63

LARRY JORDAN, APPELLANT,

 V.

ANTHONY J. PRINCIPI,

SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, APPELLEE.

Before HOLDAWAY, IVERS, and STEINBERG, Judges.

O R D E R

This is an appeal from a November 29, 1999, decision of the Board of Veterans' Appeals

(BVA or Board) that, inter alia, determined that the veteran had not raised a valid claim of clear and

unmistakable error (CUE) as to a November 25, 1977, regional office (RO) decision. The parties

filed briefs, and the Court subsequently ordered them to file supplemental pleadings as to why, in

light of the enactment of the Veterans Claims Assistance Act of 2000 (VCAA), Pub.L.No. 106-475,

114 Stat. 2096 (Nov. 9, 2000), the matter on appeal should not be remanded. The veteran's response

argued against a remand, and the Secretary's argued in favor of a remand, in light of the enactment

of the VCAA.

Following the filing of the supplemental pleadings, the Court decided Livesay v. Principi,

15 Vet.App. 165 (2001) (finding that VCAA is not applicable to CUE matters). Also relevant is the

decision of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in Disabled American Veterans v.

Gober, 234 F.3d 682 (Fed. Cir. 2000) (holding that failure to comply with pleading requirements

when asserting CUE in BVA decision could not be valid basis to deny such assertion of CUE and

invalidating 38 C.F.R. § 20.1404(b) (1999) to extent that it sanctions such denial, which creates res

judicata effect under 38 C.F.R. § 20.1404(c)), cert. denied, 121 S.Ct. 1605 (2001); see also 66

Fed.Reg. 35902, 35902-03 (July 10, 2001) (revising § 20.1404(b) so as "to provide that the Board

will dismiss such motions [to dismiss for failure to comply with pleading requirements] without

prejudice to refiling"). Finally, the Court is also concerned about the extent to which principles of

res judicata should apply, as a general matter independent of the regulation, to a final VA or BVA

decision denying a CUE claim on the ground that it fails to meet CUE pleading requirements set

forth in Fugo v. Derwinski, 6 Vet.App. 40, 43 (1993).

Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is

ORDERED that, within 30 days after the date of this order, the appellant file and serve on

the Secretary a supplemental brief addressing the impact, if any, of recent, precedential case law and

principles of res judicata on this appeal. It is further
2

ORDERED that, within 30 days of service of the appellant's supplemental brief, the Secretary

file a responsive supplemental brief.

DATED: January 16, 2002 PER CURIAM.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# US Ships Exercise Tactical Complexity and Interoperability during CARAT Singapore

By Staff writerCommander, Logistics Group Western Pacific

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More Articles/News