alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 170.471 How are projects administered? ( a ) When a Tribe carries out a TTP project, the project will be administered in accordance with a self-determination contract, self-governance agreement, Program Agreement or other appropriate agreement and this regulation.
( b ) If BIA or FHWA discovers a problem during an on-site monitoring visit, BIA or FHWA must promptly notify the Tribe and, if asked, provide technical assistance.
( c ) Only the State-licensed professional engineer of record whose name and professional stamp appear on the PS&E or who is responsible for the overall project design may change a TTP project's PS&E during construction. ( 1 ) The original approving agency must review each substantial change. The approving agency is the Federal, Tribal, State, or local entity with PS&E approval authority over the project.
( 2 ) The approving agency must consult with the affected Tribe and the entity having maintenance responsibility.
( 3 ) A change that exceeds the limits of available funding may be made only with the approving agency's consent.
#### § 117.32 Funds of Indians of other tribes.

The funds of restricted non-Osage Indians, both adults and minors, residing within the jurisdiction of the Osage Agency, derived from sources within the Osage Nation and collected through the Osage Agency, may be disbursed by the superintendent, subject to the condition that all payments to third persons, including taxes and insurance premiums, shall be made upon the written authorization of the individual whose funds are involved, if an adult, and upon the written authorization of the parent or guardian, if a minor. The funds of restricted non-Osage Indians who do not reside within the jurisdiction of the Osage Agency shall be transferred to the superintendent of the jurisdiction within which the Indian resides, to be disbursed under regulations of the receiving agency.
#### § 214.6 Failure of lessee to complete lease.

Should a lessee fail to furnish, within the time specified after his bid is accepted, the papers necessary to put his lease and bond in proper form for consideration, the officer in charge shall recommend that the sale be disapproved and money paid forfeited to the Osage Tribe.
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 37 (Thursday, February 24, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 10363-10364]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-4053]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisitions of Shares of a Bank 
or Bank Holding Company

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec.  225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire shares of a bank or bank 
holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the 
notices are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).
    The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal 
Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for 
inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons 
may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for 
that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must 
be received not later than March 9, 2011.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco (Kenneth Binning, Vice 
President, Applications and Enforcement) 101 Market Street, San 
Francisco, California 94105-1579:
    1. Michael Fayne Rosinus, Winnetka, Illinois, as part of a group 
acting in concert with Lightyear Capital, LLC, New York, New York; to 
acquire .11 percent of the voting shares of Cascade Bancorp, and 
thereby indirectly acquire voting shares of Bank of the Cascades, both 
of Bend, Oregon.


[[Page 10364]]


    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, February 17, 
2011.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2011-4053 Filed 2-23-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
### §907. Art. 107. False official statements; false swearing

(a) False Official Statements.—Any person subject to this chapter who, with intent to deceive—

(1) signs any false record, return, regulation, order, or other official document, knowing it to be false; or

(2) makes any other false official statement knowing it to be false;

shall be punished as a court-martial may direct.

(b) False Swearing.—Any person subject to this chapter—

(1) who takes an oath that—

(A) is administered in a matter in which such oath is required or authorized by law; and

(B) is administered by a person with authority to do so; and

(2) who, upon such oath, makes or subscribes to a statement;

if the statement is false and at the time of taking the oath, the person does not believe the statement to be true, shall be punished as a court-martial may direct.

(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 71; Pub. L. 114–328, div. E, title LX, §5419, Dec. 23, 2016, 130 Stat. 2946.)

| Revised section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 907 | 50:701. | May 5, 1950, ch. 169, §1 (Art. 107), 64 Stat. 138. |

The word "it" is substituted for the words "the same".

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2016—Pub. L. 114–328 amended section generally. Prior to amendment, text read as follows: "Any person subject to this chapter who, with intent to deceive, signs any false record, return, regulation, order, or other official document, knowing it to be false, or makes any other false official statement knowing it to be false, shall be punished as a court-martial may direct."

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2016 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 114–328 effective on Jan. 1, 2019, as designated by the President, with implementing regulations and provisions relating to applicability to various situations, see section 5542 of Pub. L. 114–328 and Ex. Ord. No. 13825, set out as notes under section 801 of this title.
155 So.2d 608

#### Wyatt Tee WALKER v. STATE.

3 Div. 51.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

July 25, 1963.

Fred Gray and Solomon S. Seay, Jr., Montgomery, Jack Greenberg and Leroy D. Clark, New York City, and Louis H. Poliak, New Haven, Conn., for petitioner.

Richmond M. Flowers, Atty. Gen., and Leslie Hall, Asst. Atty, Gen., opposed.

COLEMAN, Justice.

Petition of Wyatt Tee Walker for certiorari to the Court of Appeals to review and revise the judgment and decision of that Court in Walker v. State, 155 So.2d 607.

Writ denied.

LIVINGSTON, C. J., and LAWSON and GOODWYN, JJ., concur.
#### § 273.175 How will a Tribal governing body apply Indian preference requirements for contracts and subcontracts?

A Tribal governing body may develop its own Indian preference requirements for its contracts and subcontracts.
#### § 26.19 Will I be required to contribute financially to my employment and training goals?

Yes, the Job Placement and Training Program clients are required to seek other funding, including the use of personal resources as a condition of their ISP.
EX-10.23





 Exhibit 10.23 

 
  
 



 
 200 Lafayette Street, 6th Floor 

New York, New York 10012 
 T(212) 364 6490 
 chobani.com 

 

			
		  	Jason Blaisure
		
		  	Dear Jason,
		
	AUGUST 2018	  	We are pleased to inform you of our decision to award you with Retention Bonus Payments, as a component of your Total Compensation package.
	-	  	
	NEW YORK, NY	  	Effective with the payroll immediately following June 30 and December 31 in each of fiscal years 2018, 2019 and 2020, we will make a lump sum payment to you in the amount of $25,000, subject to all taxes required by
law.
		
		  	Should Chobani implement a long term incentive program, these Retention Bonus Payments would cease.
		
		  	All of us here at Chobani wish to extend our appreciation for your contributions and commitment to the organization. Your continued dedication to our goals is essential to our future success.
		
		  	Sincerely,

  

			
		
		  	/s/ Grace Zuncic
		
		  	Grace Zuncic
		  	Senior Vice President, People
§ 170.125 What types of activities can a recreation, tourism, and trails program include? ( a ) The following are examples of activities that Tribes and Consortiums may include in a recreation, tourism, and trails program: ( 1 ) Transportation planning for tourism and recreation travel;
( 2 ) Adjacent public vehicle parking areas;
( 3 ) Development of tourist information and interpretative signs;
( 4 ) Provision for non-motorized trail activities including pedestrians and bicycles;
( 5 ) Provision for motorized trail activities including all-terrain vehicles, motorcycles, snowmobiles, etc.;
( 6 ) Construction improvements that enhance and promote safe travel on trails;
( 7 ) Safety and educational activities;
( 8 ) Maintenance and restoration of existing recreational trails;
( 9 ) Development and rehabilitation of trailside and trailhead facilities and trail linkage for recreational trails;
( 10 ) Purchase and lease of recreational trail construction and maintenance equipment;
( 11 ) Safety considerations for trail intersections;
( 12 ) Landscaping and scenic enhancement (see 23 U.S.C. 319);
( 13 ) Bicycle transportation and pedestrian walkways (see 23 U.S.C. 217); and
( 14 ) Trail access roads.
( b ) The items listed in paragraph (a) of this section are not the only activities that are eligible for recreation, tourism, and trails funding. The funding criteria may vary with the specific requirements of the programs.
( c ) Tribes may use TTP funds for any activity that is eligible for Federal funding under any provision of title 23 of the U.S.C.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

# Multinational Forces Tackle Exercise Kiwi Koru Challenges during Force-on-Force Scenario

By Staff Sgt. Christopher Hubenthal

                WHANGAMONONA, New Zealand  –              

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

Exercise Kiwi Koru

pacom

news

articles
#### § 166.416 May a permittee make a grazing rental payment in advance of the due date?

Rent may be paid no more than 30 days in advance, unless otherwise specified in the permit.
# C_2006165EN.01002001.xml

| 15.7.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 165/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.7.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 165/20

---

Action brought on 16 May 2006 — Commission of the European Communities v French Republic

(Case C-222/06)

(2006/C 165/36)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: D. Maidani and G. Braun, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: French Republic

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | declare that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2001/97/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 December 2001 amending Council Directive 91/308/EEC on prevention of the use of the financial system for the purpose of money laundering (1), the French Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2001/97/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 December 2001 amending Council Directive 91/308/EEC on prevention of the use of the financial system for the purpose of money laundering (1), the French Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive;

1

| — | order the French Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the French Republic to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The period for transposing the directive expired on 15 June 2003.

---

(1)   OJ 2001 L 344, p. 76.

1

---
§ 169.114 How will BIA determine fair market value for a right-of-way? ( a ) We will use a market analysis, appraisal, or other appropriate valuation method to determine the fair market value before we grant a right-of-way over or across individually owned Indian land. We will also use a market analysis, appraisal, or other appropriate valuation method to determine, at the request of the tribe, the fair market value of tribal land.
( b ) We will either: ( 1 ) Prepare, or have prepared, a market analysis, appraisal, or other appropriate valuation method; or
( 2 ) Approve use of a market analysis, appraisal, or other appropriate valuation method from the Indian landowners or grantee.
( c ) We will use or approve use of a market analysis, appraisal, or other appropriate valuation method only if it: ( 1 ) Has been prepared in accordance with USPAP or a valuation method developed by the Secretary under 25 U.S.C. 2214 and complies with Departmental policies regarding appraisals, including third-party appraisals; or
( 2 ) Has been prepared by another Federal agency.
EX-35.2
(logo) MIDLAND    (logo) PNC
       LOAN              REAL ESTATE
       SERVICES

OFFICER CERTIFICATE

Morgan Stanley Capital I Inc.
Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates
Series 2012-C4


March 1, 2013

Pursuant to the requirements of that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement
(the "Agreement"), it is hereby certified that on behalf of PNC Bank, National
Association d/b/a Midland Loan Services as successor by merger to Midland Loan
Services, Inc. (the "Servicer"),

(i) a review of the Servicer's activities during the calendar year 2012 (the
"Reporting Period") and of its performance under the Agreement has been made
under the undersigned officer's supervision;
(ii) to the best of the undersigned officer's knowledge, based on such review,
the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all
material respects throughout the Reporting Period or, if there has been a
failure to fulfill any such obligation in any material respect, each such
failure known to the undersigned officer and the nature and status thereof are
set forth below; and

Nature and Status of Failures: None.

PNC BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCATION
d/ba MIDLAND LOAN SERVICES


/s/ Steven W. Smith
Steven W. Smith
Executive Vice President

Member of The PNC Financial Services Group

10851 Mastin Boulevard  Overland Park, Kansas 66210
800-327-8083
www.pnc.com/midland
§ 213.23 Royalty rates for minerals other than oil and gas. Unless otherwise authorized by the Commissioner of Indian Affairs, the minimum rates for minerals other than oil and gas shall be as follows: ( a ) For substances other than gold, silver, copper, lead, zinc, tungsten, coal, asphaltum and allied substances, oil, and gas, the lessee shall pay quarterly or as otherwise provided in the lease, a royalty of not less than 10 percent of the value, at the nearest shipping point, of all ores, metals, or minerals marketed.
( b ) For gold and silver the lessee shall pay quarterly or as otherwise provided in the lease, a royalty of not less than 10 percent to be computed on the value of bullion as shown by mint returns after deducting forwarding charges to the point of sale; and for copper, lead, zinc, and tungsten, a royalty of not less than 10 percent to be computed on the value of ores and concentrates as shown by reduction returns after deducting freight charges to the point of sale. Duplicate returns shall be filed by the lessee with the Area Director within 10 days after the ending of the quarter or other period specified in the lease within which such returns are made: *Provided, however,* That the lessee shall pay a royalty of not less than 10 percent of the value of the ore or concentrates sold at the mine unless otherwise provided in the lease.
( c ) For coal the lessee shall pay quarterly or as otherwise provided in the lease, a royalty of not less than 10 cents per ton of 2,000 pounds of mine run, or coal as taken from the mine, including what is commonly called “slack.”
( d ) For asphaltum and allied substances the lessee shall pay quarterly or as otherwise provided in the lease, a royalty of not less than 10 cents per ton of 2,000 pounds on crude material or not less than 60 cents per ton on refined substances.
Editorial Note on Part 224
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 224 appear at 84 FR 69611, Dec. 18, 2019.

§ 224.120 What action may the Secretary take to ensure compliance with a TERA? If the Secretary decides that a Tribe is not in compliance with a TERA, the Secretary may take only such action as the Secretary determines to be necessary to address the claims of noncompliance made in the petition including: ( a ) Temporarily suspending any activity under a lease, business agreement, or right-of-way until the Tribe complies with the TERA; or
( b ) Rescinding approval of part of the TERA, or
( c ) Rescinding all of the TERA and recommending that the Secretary reassume activities under subpart G of this part.
[73 FR 12821, Mar. 10, 2008, as amended at 84 FR 69614, Dec. 18, 2019]
§ 2.300 When is a decision effective? ( a ) Agency decisions that are subject to further administrative appeal become effective when the appeal period expires without an appeal being filed, except as provided elsewhere in this chapter.
( b ) When an agency decision is effective pursuant to paragraph (c) of this section or § 2.714, the administrative appeal will proceed unless an interested party challenges the agency decision in Federal court.
( c ) Agency decisions that are subject to further administrative appeal and for which an appeal is timely filed may be made immediately effective by the reviewing official based on public safety, Indian education safety, protection of trust resources, or other public exigency. ( 1 ) A decision-maker whose decision has been appealed may ask the reviewing official to make the appealed decision immediately effective or the reviewing official may make the appealed decision immediately effective on his or her own initiative.
( 2 ) A reviewing official's decision to make an appealed decision immediately effective must explain why public safety, Indian education safety, protection of trust resources, or other public exigency justifies making the decision immediately effective. Any challenge to the decision to put an appealed decision into immediate effect shall be incorporated into the ongoing appeal.
( 3 ) A decision by a reviewing official (other than the IBIA) to place an appealed decision into immediate effect must be in writing and include the following notice of appeal rights:
As explained above, based on concerns about public safety, Indian education safety, protection of trust resources, or other exigency, I have placed the challenged decision into immediate effect, as authorized by 25 CFR 2.300. I will continue with my review of the matter on appeal unless and until an interested party files suit in federal court challenging the agency decision.
§ 171.300 Does BIA restrict my water use? ( a ) You must not interfere with or alter our service to you without our prior written authorization; and
( b ) You must only use water we deliver for authorized uses. We may withhold services if you use water for any other purpose.
P.1 

OAR Box 1875 

Prepped by Ollie Stewart 

Document Number: 

32) ll-E-50 

Docket Number: 

A-90-19 

Printed 12/1/2008 11:12:45 AM Sheet 32 of 86 
P.2 

.A 

uv A-90-19 

\U-.'. >-'"• .\\\ ll-E-50 

MEMORANDUM \W \ ~rn \ 8 B92 ' ' '» 

DATE: Jul y 31 , 1992 

.T 1 

SUBJECT: Teleconference with CMA on HON Monitoring, Reporting, 

and Recordkeeping Requirements 

On July 31, 1992, representatives of the Chemical 

Manufacturers Association (CMA) and the Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA) participated in a teleconference to discuss the 

monitoring, reporting, and recordkeeping requirements in the 

draft proposed hazardous organic national emission standards for 

hazardous air pollutants (NESHAP), commonly known as the HON. A 

list of participants is provide in Attachment A. 

The following topics were discussed during the 

teleconference: 

1. Delegated authorities establishing alternative 

operating parameters to be monitored when reference 

control technologies are used. 

2. Storage of Data, time period for which records must be 

kept, and types of records required for monitored 

parameters. 

3. Need for Storage Vessel Maintenance Plan. 

4. Trigger that would cause a source to go to Quarterly 

Reporting instead of semiannual reporting. 

5. Potential use of the CERCLA Reportable Quantities (RQ) 

System for immediate reporting. 

6. Level of Documentation and reporting for non-recurring 

actions such as TRE calculations and performance tests. 

No specific commitments were made by either CMA or the EPA 

at this teleconference. 
\ • * • 

ATTACHMENT A 
P.4 

I y. ' 

CMA/EPA TELECONFERENCE 

July 31, 1992 

Participant List 

Name 

Mark Piersante 

Gary O'Dea 

John Dege 

Linda Herring 

Mary Tom Kissell 

Daphne McMurrer 

Jan Meyer 

Shiela Milliken 

Debbie Stackhouse 

Charlie Garlow 

Paul Reinerman 

Chuck Malloch 

Valerie Everette 

Ruth Mead 

Joe Hovious 

Affiliation 

Chevron Chemical Company 

CMA 

DuPont 

EPA/ESD 

EPA/ESD 

EPA/ESD 

EPA/ESD 

EPA/ESD 

EPA/ESD 

EPA/OE 

EPA/SSCD 

Monsanto 

Radian Corporation 

Radian Corporation 

Union Carbide