alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.1

                        CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION
                          302 OF THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT

I, Roy Piceni, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Satellite Enterprise
Corp.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and






                            Date: August 22, 2005


                            /s/ Roy Piceni
                            -----------------------
                            Roy Piceni,
                            President, CEO
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Employers & Practitioners 
-  Plan Terminations 

This page has not been translated. Please go to PBGC.gov's Spanish home page for more information available in Spanish.

Esta página no ha sido traducida. Por favor vaya a la página principal del sitio de español de PBGC para ver información disponible en español.

# Plan Terminations

##           Standard Terminations          

Find out the rules and requirements for standard termination of a fully funded pension plan, including notices, filings, distribution of benefits, and audits.

##           Distress Terminations          

Find out the requirements for distress termination of an underfunded pension plan, including the process to be followed and notices and other necessary filings.

##           PBGC-Initiated Terminations          

Find out the circumstances under which PBGC can seek the termination of an underfunded plan. 

##           How to Handle Missing Participants          

Learn more about PBGC’s program to help terminating plans distribute benefits to unlocatable participants.

December 19, 2023

##           Termination Forms and Instructions      

**Standard Terminations**Forms | Instructions

**Distress Terminations**Forms | Instructions

**Missing Participants**
                                  -  Filings for plans that terminate **before** 1/1/2018 (single-employer PBGC-insured plans only) 
                                  -  Filings for plans that terminate **on or after** 1/1/2018 (all plans covered by Missing Participants Program) 

 

All PBGC Forms

Please contact standard@pbgc.gov or distress@pbgc.gov if you have any questions regarding the instructions or forms.
**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 In connection with the Quarterly Report of SkyLynxCommunications, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period endedDecember 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report'), we, Gary L. Brown,President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Dan Sullivan, ChiefFinancial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

|  | (1) | The Report fully complies      with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange      Act of 1934; and                               |
|--|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  | (2) | The information contained      in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial      condition and result of operations of the Company. |

/s/ Gary L. Brown                Gary L. Brown, President andChief Executive OfficerFebruary 17, 2004

/s/ Dan Sullivan                     Dan Sullivan,Chief Financial OfficerFebruary 17, 2004
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 32

                      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Composite Solutions, Inc.
("Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned President and CEO of the Company hereby certifies, pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that based on his knowledge: 1)
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and 2) the information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company as of and for the periods covered in the Report.

/s/ Dr. Thomas C. Bache
------------------------------------------
 Dr. Thomas C. Bache, President & CEO

August 13, 2004

                                       22
## EPA Meeting with Fiberglass and Tank Pipe Institute (FTPI) May 30, 2012

**Attendees:** OUST

– Carolyn Hoskinson, Linda Gerber, Tim Roberts, Tim Smith, Erin Knighton, Cho Yi Kwan, Liz McDermott Sully Curran 

### , Fiberglass Tank and Pipe Institute

– Executive Director Ron Shaffer, Containment Solutions Inc. Tom Tietjen, Xerxes Corporation Tony Bennett, AkzoNobel Functional Chemicals Jennifer Agnew Scott, Dow Chemical Jeff Leiter , Leiter & Cramer PLLC
**Discussion:** EPA and the FTPI met to discuss a number of general issues as well as the proposed changes to the UST regulations. The group discussed the proposed changes to a number of definitions including continuous monitoring, interstitial monitoring and secondary containment. The group also discu ssed periodic testing of secondary containment as well as issues with compatibility.
### §9564. Navy and Marine Corps: camp equipment and transportation; when on shore duty with Air Force

While any detachment of the Navy or Marine Corps is on shore duty in cooperation with troops of the Air Force, the Secretary of the Air Force shall, upon the requisition of the officer of the Navy or Marine Corps in command of the detachment, issue rations and camp equipment, and furnish transportation, to that detachment.

(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 578.)

| Revised section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 9564 | 10:1259d.10:1259e.34:541. | R.S. 1143; June 28, 1950, ch. 383, §402(a), 64 Stat. 272. |
| | | R.S. 1135; June 28, 1950, ch. 383, §402(a), 64 Stat. 272. |

10:1259e.

34:541.

The words "While * * * on shore duty" are substituted for the words "under orders to act on shore", in 10:1259d and 1259e, and 34:541. The words "the Secretary of the Air Force" are substituted for the words "the branch, office, or officers of the Army, the Secretary of the Army may from time to time designate", in 10:1259d and 1259e, and 34:541, since the functions which, for the Army, are assigned by statute to subordinate officers of the Army, are, for the Air Force, assigned to the Secretary of the Air Force. The words "during the time such detachment is so acting or proceeding to act", in 10:1259d and 1259e, and 34:541, are omitted as surplusage. The words "their baggage, provisions, and cannon", in 10:1259e and 34:541, are omitted as surplusage. The words "and shall furnish the naval officer commanding any such detachment, and his necessary aides, with horses, accouterments, and forage", in 10:1259e and 34:541, are omitted as obsolete.
EX-34.3
(logo) pwc


Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Board of Directors, PNC Financial Services Group, Inc.:

We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying Report on
Assessment of Compliance with Regulation AB Servicing Criteria, that Midland
Loan Services, a division of PNC Bank, National Association ("Midland" or the
"Company") complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the
Securities and Exchange Commission's Regulation AB for the commercial
mortgage-backed securities transactions (the "Platform"), as of December 31,
2013 and for the year then ended, excluding criteria 1122(d)(1)(iii),
1122(d)(3)(i)(B), 1122(d)(3)(i)(C), 1122(d)(3)(i)(D), 1122(d)(3)(ii),
1122(d)(3)(iii), 1122(d)(3)(iv), and 1122(d)(4)(xv), which the Company has
determined are not applicable to the servicing activities performed by it with
respect to the Platform. Management is responsible for the Company's compliance
with the servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on
management's assertion based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly,
included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance
with the applicable servicing criteria and performing such other procedures as
we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing
of selected asset-backed transactions and securities that comprise the Platform,
testing of selected servicing activities related to the Platform, and
determining whether the Company processed those selected transactions and
performed those selected activities in compliance with the applicable servicing
criteria. Our procedures were limited to the selected transactions and servicing
activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report.
Our procedures were not designed to detect noncompliance arising from errors
that may have occurred prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have
affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during
the period covered by this report. We believe that our examination provides a
reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal
determination on the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria.

In our opinion, management's assertion that Midland complied with the
aforementioned applicable servicing criteria as of and for the year ended
December 31, 2013 for the Platform is fairly stated, in all material respects.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

February 24, 2014


PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, 1100 Walnut, Suite 1300, Kansas City, MO 64106
T: (816) 472 7921, F: (816) 218 1890, www.pwc.com/us
# C_2014113EN.01002901.xml

| 15.4.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 113/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.4.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 113/29

---

Notice to economic operators — New round of requests for the suspension of the autonomous Common Customs Tariff duties on certain industrial and agricultural products

2014/C 113/08

Economic operators are informed that the Commission has received requests in accordance with the administrative arrangements foreseen in the Commission Communication concerning autonomous tariff suspensions and quotas (2011/C 363/02) (1) for the January round of 2015.

1

The list of the products for which a duty suspension is requested is now available on the Commission’s thematic (Europa) website on the customs union (2).

2

Economic operators are also informed that the deadline for objections against new requests to reach the Commission, via the national administrations, is 17 June 2014 which is the date of the second scheduled meeting of the Economic Tariff Questions Group.

Interested operators are advised to consult the list regularly in order to be informed on the status as the requests.

More information on the autonomous tariff suspension procedure can be found on the Europa website:

http://ec.europa.eu/taxation_customs/customs/customs_duties/tariff_aspects/suspensions/index_en.htm

---

(1)  OJ C 363, 13.12.2011, p. 6.

1

(2)  http://ec.europa.eu/taxation_customs/dds2/susp/susp_home.jsp?Lang=en

2

---
# C_2006224EN.01004501.xml

| 16.9.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 224/45 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.9.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 224/45

---

Order of the Court of First Instance of 22 June 2006 — Sahlstedt and Others v Commission

(Case T-150/05) (1)

1

(Council Directive 92/43/EEC - Conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora - Commission Decision 2005/101/EC - List of sites of Community importance for the Boreal biogeographical region - Action for annulment - Inadmissibility)

(2006/C 224/96)

Language of the case: Finnish

Parties

Applicants: Markku Sahlstedt (Karkkila, Finland), Juha Kankkunen (Laukaa, Finland), Mikko Tanner (Vihti, Finland), Toini Tanner (Helsinki, Finland), Liisa Tanner (Helsinki), Eeva Jokinen (Helsinki), Aili Oksanen (Helsinki), Olli Tanner (Lohja, Finland), Leena Tanner (Helsinki), Aila Puttonen (Ristiina, Finland), Risto Tanner (Espoo, Finland), Tom Järvinen (Espoo), Runo K. Kurko (Espoo), Maa- ja metsätaloustuottajain keskusliitto MTK ry (Helsinki) and MTK:n säätiö (Helsinki) (represented by: K. Marttinen, lawyer)

Applicants:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: M. van Beek and M. Huttunen, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Intervener in support of the defendant: Republic of Finland (represented by: A. Guimaraes-Purokoski and J. Himmanen, Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant:

Re:

Action for annulment of Commission Decision 2005/101/EC of 13 January 2005 adopting, pursuant to Council Directive 92/43/EEC, the list of sites of Community importance for the Boreal biogeographical region (OJ 2005 L 40, p. 1)

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as inadmissible; |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as inadmissible;

| 2. | The applicants shall bear their own costs and the costs incurred by the Commission; |
| --- | --- |

2.

The applicants shall bear their own costs and the costs incurred by the Commission;

| 3. | The Republic of Finland shall bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

The Republic of Finland shall bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 143, 11.6.2005.

1

---
1

Date: July 16, 2013

Subject: Minutes of the July 16, 2013 meeting with Representatives of the Mineral Wool

Manufacturing Industry

I. Introduction

A meeting with representatives of the North American Insulation Manufacturers Association

(NAIMA) and the m ineral wool manufacturing industr y was held with U.S. Environmental

Protection Agency (EPA) staff on July 16, 2013 . The purpose of the meeting w as to discuss the

supplemental proposal for mineral wool manufacturing

. This memorandum summarizes the major

to pics discussed during the meeting

.

II. Participants

Mike Pettis, Owens Corning

Mike Hill, USG

Lane Coble, Rock Wool

Gerald Miller, Rock Wool

Mike McLaughlin, Roxul

Kenneth Cammarito, Roxul

Steve Edris, Thermafiber

Angus Crane, NAIMA

Brent Tracy, Johns Manvil le

Sherri Livengood, Johns Manville

Bruce Ray, Johns Manville

Susan Fairchild, U.S. EPA, OAQPS

Steffan Johnson , U.S. EPA, O AQPS

Keith Barnett, U.S. EPA, OAQPS

Ray Merrill, U.S. EPA, OAQPS

Larry Sorrels, U.S. EPA, OAQPS

Dave Reeves , RTI International

Cindy Hancy, RTI International

III. Discussion

NAIMA supports the carbonyl sulfide, PM, and binder HAP limits, as well as, the 3 year

compliance period, the sub

- categorization of sources, and the SSM requirements. NAIMA

expressed concern with the limits for horizon tal curing and collection ; EPA replied that the limits

for horizontal collection support the data that was submitted and that EPA is reviewing the

supplemental data form Rock Wool but may need additional information (i.e., scrubber

parameters ) to move forw ard . Industry also discussed concerns with HF and HCl limits and the

fact that there is such little test data. EPA stated they would consider any additional test data if

submitted within a timely manner. EPA concluded the meeting by explaining the SSM

req uirements in the supplemental proposal.
Opinion filed February 21, 2013

In The

Eleventh Court of Appeals __________

No. 11-13-00031-CV

__________

CAROL JOHNENE MORRIS, Appellant

V.

MIDLAND CENTRAL APPRAISAL DISTRICT, Appellee

On Appeal from the 142nd District Court

Midland County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. TX13106

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Carol Johnene Morris filed a pro se notice of appeal from an order of partial dismissal

that was entered by the trial court on December 31, 2012. We notified Morris by letter dated 

January 30, 2013, that it did not appear to this court that a final, appealable order had been 

entered by the trial court, and we requested that Morris file a response showing grounds to 

continue this appeal. Morris filed a response on February 11. However, she has not shown 

appropriate grounds to continue. 

Unless specifically authorized by statute, appeals may be taken only from final 

judgments. Tex. A & M Univ. Sys. v. Koseoglu, 233 S.W.3d 835, 840–41 (Tex. 2007); 
2

Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191 (Tex. 2001). In this case, the trial court merely 

ordered that “this case is dismissed only as to the Properties listed below.” The dismissal was 

entered without prejudice to the ability of the plaintiff, Midland Central Appraisal District, to 

refile the cause of action against Morris at a later date. The order specifically states that the 

remaining causes of action as to all other property may be further prosecuted. Morris suggests in 

her response that the trial court’s order constituted a severance order rendering judgment for the 

plaintiff. We disagree. There is no indication that the trial court intended for the order to be 

final and appealable, and it is not. Because no final, appealable order has been entered in this 

case, we lack jurisdiction and dismiss this appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3.

Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

PER CURIAM

February 21, 2013

Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

McCall, J., and Willson, J.
# C_2014011EN.01000101.xml

| 15.1.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 11/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.1.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 11/1

---

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the TFEU

Cases where the Commission raises no objections

(Text with EEA relevance)

2014/C 11/01

| Date of adoption of the decision | 30.9.2013 |
| --- | --- |
| Reference number of State Aid | SA.36896 (13/N) |
| Member State | Slovenia |
| Region | — | — |
| Title (and/or name of the beneficiary) | Rescue aid for Mariborska Livarna Maribor (‘MLM d.d.’) — Slovenia |
| Legal basis | — |
| Type of measure | Individual aid | Mariborska Livarna Maribor (MLM d.d.) |
| Objective | Rescuing firms in difficulty |
| Form of aid | Guarantee |
| Budget | Overall budget: EUR 5,1 million |
| Intensity | 100 % |
| Duration (period) | — |
| Economic sectors | Manufacturing |
| Name and address of the granting authority | Slovenian Ministry of Finance |
| Župančičeva 3 |
| SI-1001 Ljubljana |
| SLOVENIJA |

Date of adoption of the decision

30.9.2013

Reference number of State Aid

SA.36896 (13/N)

Member State

Slovenia

Region

—

—

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

Rescue aid for Mariborska Livarna Maribor (‘MLM d.d.’) — Slovenia

Legal basis

—

Type of measure

Individual aid

Mariborska Livarna Maribor (MLM d.d.)

Objective

Rescuing firms in difficulty

Form of aid

Guarantee

Budget

Overall budget: EUR 5,1 million

Intensity

100 %

Duration (period)

—

Economic sectors

Manufacturing

Name and address of the granting authority

Slovenian Ministry of Finance

Župančičeva 3

SI-1001 Ljubljana

SLOVENIJA

Other information

—

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

http://ec.europa.eu/competition/elojade/isef/index.cfm

---
§ 162.348 How will BIA decide whether to approve an amendment of a residential lease? ( a ) We may disapprove a residential lease amendment only if at least one of the following is true: ( 1 ) The Indian landowners have not consented and their consent is required;
( 2 ) The lessee's mortgagees have not consented;
( 3 ) The lessee is in violation of the lease;
( 4 ) The requirements of this subpart have not been met; or
( 5 ) We find a compelling reason to withhold our approval in order to protect the best interests of the Indian landowners.
( b ) We will defer, to the maximum extent possible, to the Indian landowners' determination that the amendment is in their best interest.
( c ) We may not unreasonably withhold approval of an amendment.
### §665. Procedures for monitoring careers of joint qualified officers

(a) Procedures.—(1) The Secretary of Defense, with the advice of the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, shall establish procedures for overseeing the careers of—

(A) officers designated as a joint qualified officer; and

(B) other officers who serve in joint duty assignments.

(2) Such oversight shall include monitoring of the implementation of the career guidelines established under section 661(e) of this title.

(b) Function of Joint Staff.—The Secretary shall take such action as necessary to enhance the capabilities of the Joint Staff so that it can—

(1) monitor the promotions and career assignments of officers designated as a joint qualified officer and of other officers who have served in joint duty assignments; and

(2) otherwise advise the Chairman on joint personnel matters.

(Added Pub. L. 99–433, title IV, §401(a), Oct. 1, 1986, 100 Stat. 1028; amended Pub. L. 110–417, [div. A], title V, §522(c)(1), (2), Oct. 14, 2008, 122 Stat. 4445.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2008—Pub. L. 110–417 in section catchline substituted "joint qualified officers" for "joint officers" and in subsecs. (a)(1)(A) and (b)(1) substituted "designated as a joint qualified officer" for "with the joint specialty".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Transition to Joint Officer Personnel Policy

Procedures under subsec. (a) of this section to be established not later than the end of the eight-month period beginning Oct. 1, 1986, and provisions of subsec. (b) of this section to be implemented not later than the end of such period, see section 406(c) of Pub. L. 99–433, set out as a note under section 661 of this title.
#### § 169.55 Is a valuation required for service line agreements?

We do not require a valuation for service line agreements.