alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 35.4



LOGO

ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE

OF

LNR PARTNERS, LLC

The undersigned, Job Warshaw, being the President of LNR Partners, LLC (the Special Servicer), as special servicer under the
applicable Pooling and Servicing Agreement for the transactions listed on Schedule II hereto, hereby certifies, subject to any limitations listed on Schedule II hereto, as of the date hereof, on behalf of the Special Servicer, solely
in his capacity as an officer of the Special Servicer and not in his individual capacity, as follows:



| | 1. | I have reviewed the activities performed by the Special Servicer under the applicable Pooling and Servicing Agreement during the period commencing on January 1, 2013 and ending on December 31, 2013 (or any
other shorter period set forth on Schedule II hereto) (the Reporting Period), and the Special Servicers performance under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement has been made under my supervision; and
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review and using the applicable servicing criteria under Item 1122 of Regulation AB, the Special Servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the applicable Pooling and
Servicing Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



LNR PARTNERS, LLC,a Florida limited liability companyBy:

/s/ Job WarshawJob Warshaw President


Dated: February 28, 2014

1601 Washington Avenue  Suite 700  Miami Beach, Florida 33139-3164

Telephone: (305) 695-5600  Fax: (305) 695-5601



---

Schedule II



|                                                                                                      |  |                                  
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------------------
|Transaction                                                                                           |  | Certificate Restrictions (if any)
|CFCRE Commercial Mortgage Trust 2011-C1 Commercial Mortgage Pass Through Certificates, Series 2011-C1 |  |                                  
|                                                                                                      | 
|CFCRE Commercial Mortgage Trust 2011-C2 Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2011-C2 |  |
156 So.2d 158

#### Ex parte David BUSBY.

6 Div. 16.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

Aug. 29, 1963.

David Busby pro se.

Richmond M. Flowers, Atty. Gen., and John G. Bookout, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.

SIMPSON, Justice.

A petition for Writ of Error was filed by appellant in this Court on July 17, 1963. No transcript of the proceedings held below has been filed. The State has filed a motion to dismiss.

Without conceding that the writ of error is the proper method to secure appellate review of the petitioner’s cause (Writ of Error Coram Nobis) the fact remains, that the writ must be denied for failure to file the transcript of record of the proceedings held in the lower court. We cannot be put to guesswork in determining whether error , has been committed below.

 The writ of error can be gi'anted' only on some error of law apparent on the transcript of record. § 383, Tit. 15, Code of Ala. 1940, as amended. The office of such writ of error, which is available in. criminal cases only, is to secure a revision of the record only by the appellate court. Seitz v. State, 19 Ala.App. 498, 98 So. 321.

*473Not having a transcript of record before us, it necessarily results that the petition for writ of error must be dismissed, and the writ denied.

Motion granted, writ denied.

LIVINGSTON, C. J., and MERRILL and HARWOOD, JJ., concur.
§ 11.903 Presenting officer. ( a ) The agency superintendent and the chief magistrate of the children's court shall jointly appoint a presenting officer to carry out the duties and responsibilities set forth under §§ 11.900-11.1114 of this part. The presenting officer's qualifications shall be the same as the qualifications for the official who acts as prosecutor for the Court of Indian Offenses. The presenting officer may be the same person who acts as prosecutor in the Court of Indian Offenses.
( b ) The presenting officer shall represent the tribe in all proceedings under §§ 11.900-11.1114 of this part.
#### § 256.7 What housing services are available?

Four categories of assistance are available under the HIP, as outlined in the following table.

| Type of assistance | What it provides | Where to find information |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Category A | Up to $7,500 in safety or sanitation repairs to the house in which you live, which will remain substandard. Can be provided more than once, but not for more than one house and the total assistance cannot exceed $7,500. (For Alaska, freight cost not to exceed 100 percent of the cost of materials can be added to the cost of the project.) | § 256.8. |
| Category B | Up to $60,000 in renovation, which will bring your house to standard housing condition, as defined in § 256.2 of this part. Can only be provided once. (For Alaska, freight cost not to exceed 100 percent of the cost of materials can be added to the cost of the project.) | § 256.9. |
| Category C | A modest house that meets the criteria in § 256.10 of this part and the definition of standard housing in § 256.2 of this part and whose costs are determined by and limited to the criteria in § 256.19(b) and (c) of this part. Can only be provided once. (For Alaska, freight cost not to exceed 100 percent of the cost of materials can be added to the cost of the project.) | § 256.10. |
| Category D | Assistance towards the purchase of a modest house that meets the definition of standard housing in § 256.2 | § 256.11. |
### §858. Art. 58. Execution of confinement

(a) Under such instructions as the Secretary concerned may prescribe, a sentence of confinement adjudged by a court-martial or other military tribunal, whether or not the sentence includes discharge or dismissal, and whether or not the discharge or dismissal has been executed, may be carried into execution by confinement in any place of confinement under the control of any of the armed forces or in any penal or correctional institution under the control of the United States, or which the United States may be allowed to use. Persons so confined in a penal or correctional institution not under the control of one of the armed forces are subject to the same discipline and treatment as persons confined or committed by the courts of the United States or of the State, District of Columbia, or place in which the institution is situated.

(b) The omission of the words "hard labor" from any sentence of a court-martial adjudging confinement does not deprive the authority executing that sentence of the power to require hard labor as a part of the punishment.

(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 57; Pub. L. 109–163, div. A, title X, §1057(a)(3), Jan. 6, 2006, 119 Stat. 3440.)

| Revised section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 858(a)858(b) | 50:639(a).50:639(b). | May 5, 1950, ch. 169, §1 (Art. 58), 64 Stat. 126. |

858(b)

50:639(b).

In subsection (a), the words "Secretary concerned" are substituted for the words "Department concerned", since the "Department" as an entity, cannot issue instructions. The word "are" is substituted for the words "shall be". The words "of Columbia" are inserted after "District" for clarity.

In subsection (b), the word "from" is substituted for the word "in". The words "does not deprive" are substituted for the words "shall not be construed as depriving".

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2006—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 109–163 struck out "Territory," after "State,".
# C_2006165EN.01002901.xml

| 15.7.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 165/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.7.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 165/29

---

Action brought on 11 May 2006 — Xentral v OHIM — Pages Jaunes (Word mark ‘PAGESJAUNES.COM’)

(Case T -134/06)

(2006/C 165/57)

Language in which the application was lodged: French

Parties

Applicant: Xentral LLC (Miami, United States of America) (represented by: A. Bertrand, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Pages Jaunes SA (Sèvres, France)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

The applicant asks the Court to:

| — | set aside Decision R 708/2005-1 dated 15 February 2006; |
| --- | --- |

—

set aside Decision R 708/2005-1 dated 15 February 2006;

| — | uphold the Community trade mark ‘PAGESJAUNES.COM’ |
| --- | --- |

—

uphold the Community trade mark ‘PAGESJAUNES.COM’

| — | declare that all costs are the responsibility of the Board of Appeal of OHIM. |
| --- | --- |

—

declare that all costs are the responsibility of the Board of Appeal of OHIM.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: Xentral LLC

Applicant for a Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: Word mark ‘PAGESJAUNES.COM’ for goods in Class 16 (application no 1 880 871)

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: Pages Jaunes SA

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited in opposition: National word mark ‘LESPAGESJAUNES’ for goods in Class 16, the business name and the commercial name ‘PAGES JAUNES’

Mark or sign cited in opposition:

Decision of the Opposition Division: Opposition upheld for all the goods disputed

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Appeal rejected

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: The applicant relies on its previous right to the domain name ‘PAGESJAUNES.COM’ which, in its view, is enforceable against the opposing party's trade mark and business name.

Pleas in law:

It also relies on an infringement of Article 7(1)(c) and (d) of Council Regulation 40/94, in that the opposing party's trade mark is customary and has very little distinctive character.

It claims that its trade mark, in respect of which registration was sought, does not compromise the business name or commercial name of the opposing party.

The applicant also disputes the renown of the opposing party's trade mark.

---
# C_2014019EN.01000201.xml

| 22.1.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 19/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.1.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 19/2

---

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the TFEU

Cases where the Commission raises no objections

(Text with EEA relevance)

2014/C 19/02

| Date of adoption of the decision | 3.12.2013 |
| --- | --- |
| Reference number of State Aid | SA.37638 (13/N) |
| Member State | Spain |
| Region | Andalucia | Article 107(3)(a) |
| Title (and/or name of the beneficiary) | Prolongación del régimen de ayudas estatales aprobado N 593/08 [Régimen de ayudas regionales a la inversión, la creación de empleo y el apoyo a las PYME en Andalucía (España) — Extensión del N 507/2000] hasta el 30 de junio de 2014 inclusive |
| Legal basis | Decreto 394/2008 de 24 de junio, por el que se establece el marco regulador de las ayudas de finalidad regional y en favor de las pequeñas y medianas empresas (PYMEs) que se concedan por la Administración de la Junta de Andalucía. |
| Type of measure | Scheme | — |
| Objective | Regional development, Employment, SMEs |
| Form of aid | Interest subsidy, Soft loan, Direct grant |
| Budget | | Overall budget: EUR 130 million |

Date of adoption of the decision

3.12.2013

Reference number of State Aid

SA.37638 (13/N)

Member State

Spain

Region

Andalucia

Article 107(3)(a)

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

Prolongación del régimen de ayudas estatales aprobado N 593/08 [Régimen de ayudas regionales a la inversión, la creación de empleo y el apoyo a las PYME en Andalucía (España) — Extensión del N 507/2000] hasta el 30 de junio de 2014 inclusive

Legal basis

Decreto 394/2008 de 24 de junio, por el que se establece el marco regulador de las ayudas de finalidad regional y en favor de las pequeñas y medianas empresas (PYMEs) que se concedan por la Administración de la Junta de Andalucía.

Type of measure

Scheme

—

Objective

Regional development, Employment, SMEs

Form of aid

Interest subsidy, Soft loan, Direct grant

Budget

Overall budget: EUR 130 million

| | Annual budget: EUR 130 million |
| --- | --- |

Annual budget: EUR 130 million

Intensity

50 %

Duration (period)

1.1.2014-30.6.2014

Economic sectors

All economic sectors eligible to receive aid

Name and address of the granting authority

| Junta de Andalucía |
| --- |
| Avda. de Roma, s/n. |
| Sevilla |
| ESPAÑA |

Junta de Andalucía

Avda. de Roma, s/n.

Sevilla

ESPAÑA

Other information

—

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

http://ec.europa.eu/competition/elojade/isef/index.cfm

---
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# The Latest Stryker Vehicle is Built for Extremes

By Mark SchauerArmy Test and Evaluation Command

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More Articles/News
Comment Info: =================

General Comment:AD Docket Supporting Information
# SOUTHERN UTE INDIAN TRIBE

May 18,2011

Mr. James B. Martin, Regional Administrator United States Envirorunental Protection Agency- Region 8 1595 Wynkoop Street (Mail Code: 8RA) Denver, CO 80202-112

Re: Area Designations for the 2010 Revised Sulfur Dioxide National Ambient Air Quality Standards

Dear Mr. Martin, Thank you for providing the opportunity for the Southern Ute Indian Tribe ("Tribe") to participate in the establishment ofarea designations for the 2010 revised sulfur dioxide ("SO/') National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS). TheTribe understands that under 

### § 107(d)( 1)(A) ofthe Clean AirAct, areas may be designated as "nonattairunent" (areas that either do not meet the standard, orare contributing to a nearby area that does not meet the standard), "attairunent" (areas that meet the standard), or "unclassifiable" (areas where there is insufficient information to make a determination). The Southern Ute Indian Tribe respectfully recommends the EPA to designate the lands within the exterior boundaries ofthe Southern Ute Indian Reservation as "unclassifiable" for the 2010 revised S02 NAAQS. TheTribe's Air QualityProgram maintains the only two ambient air quality monitoring stations operating within the exterior boundaries ofthe Reservation. TheTribe does not monitor for S02 but continues to monitor for four othercriteria pollutants, which includes nitrogen dioxide (N02 ), ozone (03), fine particulate matter (PM2.5), and carbon monoxide (CO), all ofwhich are meeting the current NAAQS. Also, there are no large sources ofS02 emissions within the Reservation. Therefore, there is insufficient information to make an area designation other than "unclassifiable" for the 2010 revised S02 NAAQS within the exteriorboundaries ofthe Southern Ute Indian Reservation. Please contact Mr. Thomas Johnson (Envirorunental Programs Division Head) at (970)563-0135 or Mrs. Brenda Jarrell (Air QualityProgramManager) at (970)563-4705 ifyou have any questions regarding the Tribe's recommendation. RECEIVED U.S. EPA Region 8 RA'sOfflce

### Sir~lY, 

## JUN 08 2011 

# ;C:d?**&-<u~** Pearl E. Casias, Chairman SouthernUte Indian Tribe

P.O. 

### Box 737" IGNACIO, CO 

### 81137" PHONE: 

### 970-563-0100
### §949f. Challenges

(a) Challenges Authorized.—The military judge and primary or alternate members of a military commission under this chapter may be challenged by the accused or trial counsel for cause stated to the military commission. The military judge shall determine the relevance and validity of challenges for cause, and may not receive a challenge to more than one person at a time. Challenges by trial counsel shall ordinarily be presented and decided before those by the accused are offered.

(b) Peremptory Challenges.—The accused and trial counsel are each entitled to one peremptory challenge, but the military judge may not be challenged except for cause. Nothing in this section prohibits the military judge from awarding to each party such additional peremptory challenges as may be required in the interests of justice.

(c) Challenges Against Additional Members.—Whenever additional members are detailed to a military commission under this chapter, and after any challenges for cause against such additional members are presented and decided, the accused and trial counsel are each entitled to one peremptory challenge against members not previously subject to peremptory challenge.

(Added Pub. L. 111–84, div. A, title XVIII, §1802, Oct. 28, 2009, 123 Stat. 2586; amended Pub. L. 113–66, div. A, title X, §1031(b), Dec. 26, 2013, 127 Stat. 850.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 949f, added Pub. L. 109–366, §3(a)(1), Oct. 17, 2006, 120 Stat. 2613, related to challenges, prior to the general amendment of this chapter by Pub. L. 111–84.

#### Amendments

2013—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 113–66, §1031(b)(1), inserted "primary or alternate" before "members".

Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 113–66, §1031(b)(2), inserted at end "Nothing in this section prohibits the military judge from awarding to each party such additional peremptory challenges as may be required in the interests of justice."
IV

House Calendar No. 154

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 365

[Report No. 106–461]

Providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 76) waiving

certain enrollment requirements for the remainder of the first session

of the One Hundred Sixth Congress with respect to any bill or joint

resolution making general appropriations or continuing appropriations

for fiscal year 2000.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

NOVEMBER 8, 1999

Mr. DIAZ-BALART, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be

printed

RESOLUTION

Providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res.

76) waiving certain enrollment requirements for the remainder of the first session of the One Hundred Sixth

Congress with respect to any bill or joint resolution making general appropriations or continuing appropriations

for fiscal year 2000.

1 Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution

2 it shall be in order to consider in the House the joint reso3 lution (H.J. Res. 76) waiving certain enrollment require-
2

HRES 365 RH

1 ments for the remainder of the first session of the One

2 Hundred Sixth Congress with respect to any bill or joint

3 resolution making general appropriations or continuing

4 appropriations for fiscal year 2000. The joint resolution

5 shall be considered as read for amendment. The previous

6 question shall be considered as ordered on the joint resolu7 tion to final passage without intervening motion except:

8 (1) one hour of debate on the joint resolution equally di9 vided and controlled by the Majority Leader and the Mi10 nority Leader or their designees; and (2) one motion to

11 recommit.

House Calendar No. 154

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 365

[Report No. 106–461]

RESOLUTION

Providing for consideration of the joint resolution

(H.J. Res. 76) waiving certain enrollment requirements for the remainder of the first sessionof the One Hundred Sixth Congress with respectto any bill or joint resolution making general appropriations or continuing appropriations for fiscal year 2000.

NOVEMBER 8, 1999

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be

printed
## Breadcrumb

-  Inicio 
-  Información Sobre Los Planes de PBGC 
-  Plan de Pensión de J.C. Penney Corporation, Inc. 

This page has not been translated. Please go to PBGC.gov’s English home page for more information available in English.

# Plan de Pensión de J.C. Penney Corporation, Inc.

PBGC continúa trabajando con J.C. Penney Corporation, Inc. para proteger los intereses de los jubilados y futuros jubilados del plan de pensión.

En noviembre de 2020, PBGC inició los pasos para asumir la responsabilidad del plan. Esos esfuerzos quedaron en pausa para que la empresa pudiera explorar opciones para evitar que PBGC tuviera que hacerse responsable del plan y evitar posibles reducciones de los beneficios. Desde entonces, la empresa ha anunciado su intención de ejecutar una terminación estándar (página en inglés) del plan en la que los participantes recibirán todos los beneficios acumulados a partir del 31 de diciembre de 2020.

Para más información sobre la transacción, por favor visite la página de Información de Reestructuración(página en inglés) de J.C. Penney.

## Comuniquese

Los participantes del plan de pensión de J.C. Penney que tengan preguntas sobre sus beneficios deben ponerse en contacto con el Centro de Beneficios de J.C. Penney, disponible de lunes a viernes de 8:00 a.m. a 8:00 p.m., Hora Central.

En Internet: www.jcpbenefits.com (página en inglés)

Por teléfono: 1-888-890-8900

Déjenos sus comentarios