alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2014014EN.01000301.xml

| 18.1.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 14/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.1.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 14/3

---

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the TFEU

Cases where the Commission raises no objections

(Text with EEA relevance)

2014/C 14/04

| Date of adoption of the decision | 29.11.2013 |
| --- | --- |
| Reference number of State Aid | SA.37436 (13/N) |
| Member State | Germany |
| Region | Brandenburg | Article 107(3)(a) |
| Title (and/or name of the beneficiary) | Förderrichtlinie des Ministeriums für Wirtschaft zur Gewährung von Zuwendungen zur Konsolidierung und Standortsicherung für kleine und mittlere Unternehmen im Land Brandenburg (Konsolidierungs- und Standortsicherungsprogramm) |
| Legal basis | Haushaltsordnung des Landes Brandenburg (Landeshaushaltsordnung — LHO) mit den dazugehörigen Verwaltungsvorschriften (VV-LHO) |
| Type of measure | Scheme | — |
| Objective | Rescuing firms in difficulty, Restructuring firms in difficulty |
| Form of aid | Soft loan |
| Budget | | Overall budget: EUR 7,2226 million |

Date of adoption of the decision

29.11.2013

Reference number of State Aid

SA.37436 (13/N)

Member State

Germany

Region

Brandenburg

Article 107(3)(a)

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

Förderrichtlinie des Ministeriums für Wirtschaft zur Gewährung von Zuwendungen zur Konsolidierung und Standortsicherung für kleine und mittlere Unternehmen im Land Brandenburg (Konsolidierungs- und Standortsicherungsprogramm)

Legal basis

Haushaltsordnung des Landes Brandenburg (Landeshaushaltsordnung — LHO) mit den dazugehörigen Verwaltungsvorschriften (VV-LHO)

Type of measure

Scheme

—

Objective

Rescuing firms in difficulty, Restructuring firms in difficulty

Form of aid

Soft loan

Budget

Overall budget: EUR 7,2226 million

| | Annual budget: EUR 1 million |
| --- | --- |

Annual budget: EUR 1 million

Intensity

100 %

Duration (period)

1.1.2014-31.12.2014

Economic sectors

All economic sectors eligible to receive aid

Name and address of the granting authority

| Investitionsbank des Landes Brandenburg |
| --- |
| Steinstraße 104-106 |
| 14480 Potsdam |
| DEUTSCHLAND |

Investitionsbank des Landes Brandenburg

Steinstraße 104-106

14480 Potsdam

DEUTSCHLAND

Other information

—

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

http://ec.europa.eu/competition/elojade/isef/index.cfm

---
(logo) Deloitte

 

**Deloitte & Touche LLP**

Suite 1000

695 Town Center Drive 

Costa Mesa, CA 92626 

USA

 

Tel:  +1 714 436 7100

Fax:  +1 714 436 7200

www.deloitte.com

 

** **

**REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTEREDPUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

To Pacific Life InsuranceCompany:

 

We have examined management'sassertion, included in the accompanying Management's Report on Assessment ofCompliance with SEC Regulation AB Servicing Criteria, that Pacific Life InsuranceCompany (the "Company") complied with the relevant servicing criteriaset forth in Item 1122 (d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission'sRegulation AB for the Securitized Commercial Mortgage Loans Operating AdvisorPlatform (the "Advisor Platform"), specifically criteria1122(d)(l)(v), (d)(3)(i)(a-c) and (d)(4)(vii), as of and for the year endedDecember 31, 2019, which management has determined to be applicable to theactivities performed by the Company with respect to the Advisor Platform. AppendixA to management's assertion identifies the individual asset-backed transactionsdefined by management as constituting the Advisor Platform. Management isresponsible for the Company's compliance with the relevant servicing criteria.Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion about theCompany's compliance with the relevant servicing criteria based on ourexamination.

 

Our examination was conductedin accordance with attestation standards of the Public Company Accounting OversightBoard (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis,evidence about the Company's compliance with the applicable servicing criteria,including tests on a sample basis of servicing activities related to theAdvisor Platform, determining whether the Company performed those selectedactivities in compliance with the relevant servicing criteria during thespecified period, and performing such other procedures as we considerednecessary in the circumstances. Our procedures were limited to selectedservicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered by thisreport and, accordingly, such samples may not have included servicingactivities related to each specific asset-backed transaction included in theAdvisor Platform. Further, an examination is not designed to detectnoncompliance arising from errors that may have occurred prior to the periodspecified above that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated orreported by the Company during the period covered by this report.  Webelieve that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Ourexamination does not provide a legal determination on the Company's compliancewith the relevant servicing criteria.

 

In our opinion, management'sassertion that the Company complied with the aforementioned applicableservicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2019 for theSecuritized Commercial Mortgage Loans Operating Advisor Platform is fairlystated, in all material respects.

 

/s/ Deloitte &Touche LLP

 

February 18, 2020
# C_2006176EN.01001301.xml

| 28.7.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 176/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.7.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 176/13

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

27 July 2006

(2006/C 176/03)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2737 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 147,25 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4614 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,68420 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,2495 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5743 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 91,81 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,9065 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5750 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 28,403 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 271,64 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6960 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4293 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,9254 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,5520 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,67 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 38,005 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,9200 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6671 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4420 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,9008 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 2,0495 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0106 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 212,94 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 8,7854 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 10,1651 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,2595 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 552,46 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,678 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 65,596 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 34,1780 |
| THB | Thai baht | 48,156 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2737

JPY

Japanese yen

147,25

DKK

Danish krone

7,4614

GBP

Pound sterling

0,68420

SEK

Swedish krona

9,2495

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5743

ISK

Iceland króna

91,81

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,9065

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5750

CZK

Czech koruna

28,403

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

271,64

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6960

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4293

PLN

Polish zloty

3,9254

RON

Romanian leu

3,5520

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,67

SKK

Slovak koruna

38,005

TRY

Turkish lira

1,9200

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6671

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4420

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,9008

NZD

New Zealand dollar

2,0495

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0106

KRW

South Korean won

1 212,94

ZAR

South African rand

8,7854

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

10,1651

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,2595

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 552,46

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,678

PHP

Philippine peso

65,596

RUB

Russian rouble

34,1780

THB

Thai baht

48,156

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
# C_2013106EN.01000401.xml

| 12.4.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 106/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.4.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 106/4

---

Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries

2013/C 106/05

In accordance with Article 35(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), a decision has been taken to close the fishery as set down in the following table:

1

| Date and time of closure | 19.3.2013 |
| --- | --- |
| Duration | 19.3.2013-31.12.2013 |
| Member State | Portugal |
| Stock or group of stocks | WHB/ATLANT |
| Species | WHM/ATLANT (Tetrapturus albidus) |
| Zone | Atlantic Ocean |
| Type(s) of fishing vessels | — |
| Reference number | FS02TQ40 |

Date and time of closure

19.3.2013

Duration

19.3.2013-31.12.2013

Member State

Portugal

Stock or group of stocks

WHB/ATLANT

Species

WHM/ATLANT (Tetrapturus albidus)

Tetrapturus albidus

Zone

Atlantic Ocean

Type(s) of fishing vessels

—

Reference number

FS02TQ40

---

(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.

1

---
#### § 1000.193 Who may raise the issue of limitation or reduction of services, contracts, or funding?

BIA or any affected Tribe/Consortium or Tribal organization may raise the issue that a BIA self-governance AFA limits or reduces particular services, contracts, or funding for which it is eligible.
# C_2006156EN.01000801.xml

| 5.7.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 156/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.7.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 156/8

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4246 — Merrill Lynch/Farallon/Barcelo/Playa)

(2006/C 156/07)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 27 June 2006, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition web site (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes. |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition web site (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes.

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4246. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://ec.europa.eu/eur-lex/lex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4246. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://ec.europa.eu/eur-lex/lex)

---
H. Res. 381

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

November 17, 1999.

Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it

shall be in order without intervention of any point of order

to consider in the House the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 80)

making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year

2000, and for other purposes. The joint resolution shall be

considered as read for amendment. The previous question

shall be considered as ordered on the joint resolution to final

passage without intervening motion except: (1) one hour of

debate equally divided and controlled by the chairman and

ranking minority member of the Committee on Appropriations; and (2) one motion to recommit.

Attest:

Clerk.
IV

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 394

Returning to the Senate the bill S. 1232.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

NOVEMBER 18, 1999

Mr. WELLER submitted the following resolution; which was considered and

agreed to

RESOLUTION

Returning to the Senate the bill S. 1232.

1 Resolved, That the bill of the Senate (S. 1232) enti2 tled the ‘‘Federal Erroneous Retirement Coverage Correc3 tions Act’’, in the opinion of this House, contravenes the

4 first clause of the seventh section of the first article of

5 the Constitution of the United States and is an infringe6 ment of the privileges of this House and that such bill

7 be respectfully returned to the Senate with a message

8 communicating this resolution.

Æ
.,. ECSILLC 

Engineers • Consultants • Scientists • International 

October14, 2015 

Brittany Newton 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Federal Aviation Administration 

Airmen and Airspace Rules Division 

800 Independence Ave., SW 

Washington, DC 20591 

336 Town Mountain Road, Suite 4 

Pikeville, Kentucky 41501 

606.432.2443 

www.engrservices.com 

Re: Docket No. FAA-2015-2805, Exemption Request Under Section 333 of the FAA Reform Act 

and Part 11 of the Federal Aviation Regulations 

Dear Ms. Newton: 

Thank you for the review of, and reply to, our Petition for Exemption. Attached please find the 

originally submitted petition with the addition of comments concerning justification for the request 

on the basis ofhow it would be in the public interest to grant such petition (addressing §11.81(d)). 

The added portion is found in Section 3d of the attached, revised letter. 

If, upon review of this revised petition, you have additional comments or concerns, please do not 

hesitate to contact me. 

tJ)tlu~ sti· c elY. 

A y W llis, PE 

Senior Vice President 

ECSI, LLC 

attachment
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 302 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 302

Expressing the desire of the House of Representatives to not spend any 
   of the budget surplus created by social security receipts and to 
            continue to retire the debt held by the public.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 23, 1999

    Mr. Herger (for himself, Mr. Condit, Mr. Ryan of Wisconsin, Mr. 
  Peterson of Minnesota, Mr. Campbell, Mr. Fossella, Mr. Shimkus, Mr. 
   Gary Miller of California, and Mr. Shays) submitted the following 
 resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Budget, and in 
    addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be 
subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration 
  of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee 
                               concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Expressing the desire of the House of Representatives to not spend any 
   of the budget surplus created by social security receipts and to 
            continue to retire the debt held by the public.

Whereas, earlier this year, the House of Representatives passed a social 
        security lockbox designed to protect the social security surplus by an 
        overwhelming vote of 416 to 12;
Whereas bipartisan efforts over the past few years have eliminated the budget 
        deficit and created a projected combined Social Security and non-Social 
        Security surplus of $2,896,000,000,000 over the next 10 years;
Whereas this surplus is largely due to the collection of the social security 
        taxes and interest on already collected receipts in the trust fund;
Whereas the President and the Congress have not reached an agreement to use any 
        of the surplus on providing tax relief; and
Whereas any unspent portion of the projected surplus will have the effect of 
        reducing the debt held by the public: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That it is the sense of the the House of Representatives 
that the House--
            (1) should not consider legislation that would spend any of 
        the social security surplus;
            (2) should also resist any effort to spend the on-budget 
        surplus should the Congress and the administration not reach an 
        agreement on the issue of taxes; and
            (3) should continue to pursue efforts to continue to reduce 
        the $3,618,000,000,000 in debt held by the public.
                                 <all>
```
#### The People of the State of New York v. George B. McClellan and Another.

Motion granted on condition that plaintiffs apply to the Court of Appeals for leave to bring the appeal on for argument at the earliest practicable day; questions to be determined on settlement of order, which should be on twenty-four hours’ notice. Memorandum per curiam.
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 34 (Friday, February 18, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 9615]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-3725]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

[NRC-2010-0255]


Office of New Reactors; Proposed Revision 1 to Standard Review 
Plan, Section 13.5.1.1 on Administrative Procedures--General; 
Correction

AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

ACTION: Solicitation of public comment; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document corrects a notice appearing in the Federal 
Register on February 9, 2011, that announced the solicitation for 
comments of the proposed Revision 1 to Standard Review Plan, Section 
13.5.1.1 on Administrative Procedures--General. This action is 
necessary to correct the Agencywide Documents Access and Management 
System (ADAMS) accession number for the redline document mentioned in 
the last line under the SUMMARY section.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. William F. Burton, Chief, 
Rulemaking and Guidance Development Branch, Division of New Reactor 
Licensing, Office of New Reactors, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 
Washington, DC 20555-0001; telephone at 301-415-6332 or e-mail at 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#74031d18181d15195a160106001b1a341a06175a131b02"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="6b1c020707020a0645091e191f04052b051908450c041d">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On February 9, 2011, at 76 FR 7235, NRC 
published a document announcing the availability of a proposed Revision 
1 to Standard Review Plan for public comment. In that publication, on 
page 7235 second Colum, under the section titled SUMMARY first 
paragraph, replace the last two sentences with ``Since then, the NRC 
staff has made substantial changes to that guidance and it is being re-
noticed for comments. A redline document comparing the two versions can 
be found under ADAMS Accession No. ML110100212.''

    Dated at Rockville, Maryland this 11th day of February 2011.

    For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
William F. Burton,
Chief, Rulemaking and Guidance Development Branch, Division of New 
Reactor Licensing, Office of New Reactor.
[FR Doc. 2011-3725 Filed 2-17-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### Harry S. Hooker, as Trustee in Bankruptcy of Herman Mayer and Jack Mayer, Individually and as Copartners Composing the Firm of Herman Mayer *&*Co., Respondent, v. Millie Toch and Lucas Toch, Appellants.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. No opinion. (Ingraham, J., dissenting as to defendant Lucas Toch.) Settle order on notice.
Document

Exhibit 10.10


FIRST AMENDMENT TO SECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED BUSINESS MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT
This FIRST AMENDMENT TO SECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED BUSINESS MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT (this “Amendment”), effective as of August 1, 2021, is made and entered into by and between Diversified Healthcare Trust, a Maryland real estate investment trust (the “Company”), and The RMR Group LLC, a Maryland limited liability company (the “Manager”).
WHEREAS, the Company and the Manager are parties to that certain Second Amended and Restated Business Management Agreement, dated as of June 5, 2015 (the “Business Management Agreement”); and
WHEREAS, the Company and the Manager wish to amend certain provisions of the Business Management Agreement as hereinafter provided;
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual agreements herein set forth, the parties hereto agree as follows:
1.The definition of “SNL Index” included in Section 11 of the Business Management Agreement shall be replaced in its entirety by the following:
“Index” shall mean (i) the SNL U.S. REIT Healthcare Index, as published from time to time, for all periods ending prior to August 1, 2021 and (ii) the MSCI U.S. REIT/Health Care REIT Index, as published from time to time, for all periods beginning on or after August 1, 2021.
2.The Business Management Agreement shall be amended by deleting all references therein to “SNL Index” and replacing them with references to the “Index”.
3.As amended hereby, the Business Management Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.
4.The provisions of this Amendment shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Maryland.
5.This Amendment may be executed in separate counterparts, each of such counterparts shall for all purposes be deemed to be an original and all such counterparts shall together constitute but one and the same instrument.


[Signature page follows]












IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Amendment to be executed and delivered by their respective duly authorized officers, as of the date first written above.




																					
					DIVERSIFIED HEALTHCARE TRUST
							
					By:	/s/ Jennifer F. Francis	
						Name: Jennifer F. Francis	
						Title: President and Chief Operating Officer	
							
							
							
					THE RMR GROUP LLC
							
					By:	/s/ Matthew P. Jordan	
						Name: Matthew P. Jordan	
						Title: Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
	
						
							




[Signature Page to First Amendment to Second Amended and Restated Business Management Agreement]
No. 47,474

#### Leland C. Waechter, et al., Appellees, v. Amoco Production Company, Formerly Pan American Petroleum Corporation, *Appellant.*

(546 P. 2d 1320)

Opinion on rehearing filed March 6, 1976.

(For original opinion see *Waechter v. Amoco Production Co.,*217 Kan. 489, 537 P. 2d 228.)

R. *H. Landt,*of Denver, Colo., argued the cause, and *Glenn D. Young, Jr.,*of Gott, Hope, Gott, Young and Saffels, P. A., of Wichita, was with him on the brief for the appellant.

*Dale M. Stucky,*of Fleeson, Gooing, Coulson and Kitch, of Wichita, argued the cause, and *Gerrit H. Wormhoudt*and *John T. Conlee,*of the same firm, were with him on the brief for the appellees.

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Harman, C.:

The court has considered the briefs and rearguments of counsel and has concluded the original opinion of reversal should be adhered to.

APPROVED BY THE COURT.

Fatzer, C. J., not participating.

Schroeder and Kaul, JJ., dissent.
### §20261. Selection of officers for continuation on the Space Force officer list

Section 14701 of this title shall apply in continuation or retention on the Space Force officer in the same manner as to continuation on the reserve active-status list.

(Added Pub. L. 118–31, div. A, title XVII, §1716(c), Dec. 22, 2023, 137 Stat. 653.)