alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
`[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 245 Reported in House (RH)]






                                                  House Calendar No. 85
106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 245

                          [Report No. 106-229]

    Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 1691) to protect 
                           religious liberty.


_______________________________________________________________________


                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 13, 1999

   Mrs. Myrick, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION


 
    Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 1691) to protect 
                           religious liberty.

    Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it shall be in 
order without intervention of any point of order to consider in the 
House the bill (H.R. 1691) to protect religious liberty. The bill shall 
be considered as read for amendment. The amendment recommended by the 
Committee on the Judiciary now printed in the bill shall be considered 
as adopted. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the 
bill, as amended, and on any further amendment thereto to final passage 
without intervening motion except: (1) one hour of debate on the bill, 
as amended, equally divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking 
minority member of the Committee on the Judiciary; (2) a further 
amendment printed in the Congressional Record pursuant to clause 8 of 
rule XVIII, if offered by Representative Conyers of Michigan or his 
designee, which shall be considered as read and shall be separately 
debatable for one hour equally divided and controlled by the proponent 
and an opponent; and (3) one motion to recommit with or without 
instructions.
                                     





                                                  House Calendar No. 85

106th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                              H. RES. 245

                          [Report No. 106-229]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

    Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 1691) to protect 
                           religious liberty.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             July 13, 1999

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed`
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Laws on Sex Discrimination in Employment

              																	United States. Women's Bureau. 						*Laws on Sex Discrimination in Employment : Federal Civil Rights Act, Title VII : State Fair Employment Practices Laws*,										April 1967,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/303,			accessed on September 22, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Bombers abound: North Dakota-based B-52s arrive in Pacific, provide strategic deterrence

By Capt. Stephen J. Collier,Pacific Air Forces Public Affairs

                ANDERSEN AIR FORCE BASE, Guam  –              
B-52 Stratofortress bombers assigned to the 5th Bomb Wing from Minot Air Force Base, North Dakota, landed at Andersen Air Force Base, Guam at the end of January as part of a Bomber Task Force to support strategic deterrence missions aimed at reinforcing the rules-based international order in the Indo-Pacific region.

While forward deployed to Guam, B-52 operations and support personnel are designated to the 23rd Expeditionary Bomb Squadron. The 23rd EBS will integrate alongside Allies and partners to demonstrate the U.S. commitment to security and stability throughout the region.

Designed to showcase the U.S.’s ability to deter, deny and dominate, BTF missions aim to influence and dissuade aggression from adversaries or competitors.

Reacting to the arrival of the aircraft, Capt. Zachary “Smash” Holmes, 23rd EBS weapons officer, said it was great to “finally have some iron on the ground.”

“It’s great to finally receive our crews so we’re ready to go out and take part in the mission as well as get our maintenance personnel ready to support where they’re needed,” Holmes said. “We’re ready to go.”

Aircrews and support personnel look for every opportunity to train alongside our allies and partners to build interoperability and bolster our collective ability to support a free and open Indo-Pacific.

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT
# C_2006154EN.01002602.xml

| 1.7.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 154/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.7.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 154/26

---

Action brought on 9 May 2006 — Nijs v Court of Auditors

(Case F-49/06)

(2006/C 154/61)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Bart Nijs (Bereldange, Luxembourg) (represented by: F. Rollinger, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Court of Auditors of the European Communities

Defendant:

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Tribunal should:

| — | Annul the Appointing Authority's decision not to promote the applicant in 2005 and any connected and/or subsequent decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the Appointing Authority's decision not to promote the applicant in 2005 and any connected and/or subsequent decision;

| — | Order the payment of compensation for the material and non-material damage suffered by the applicant; |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the payment of compensation for the material and non-material damage suffered by the applicant;

| — | Order the Court of Auditors to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Court of Auditors to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of his action, the applicant relies on:

| 1. | The effects for the 2004 appraisal exercise of a falsification of his staff report relating to the 2003 exercise, |
| --- | --- |

1.

The effects for the 2004 appraisal exercise of a falsification of his staff report relating to the 2003 exercise,

| 2. | Breach of the principles of legal certainty for staff, equal treatment of officials and sound administration in the application to the applicant of the new appraisal system developed by the defendant, |
| --- | --- |

2.

Breach of the principles of legal certainty for staff, equal treatment of officials and sound administration in the application to the applicant of the new appraisal system developed by the defendant,

| 3. | The fact that one of his colleagues was unlawfully asked to carry out more senior duties on a temporary basis, |
| --- | --- |

3.

The fact that one of his colleagues was unlawfully asked to carry out more senior duties on a temporary basis,

| 4. | The fact that one of his hierarchical superiors carried out his duties unlawfully, |
| --- | --- |

4.

The fact that one of his hierarchical superiors carried out his duties unlawfully,

| 5. | That superior's lack of integrity, |
| --- | --- |

5.

That superior's lack of integrity,

| 6. | Several instances of misuse of powers and a breach of the Treaty. |
| --- | --- |

6.

Several instances of misuse of powers and a breach of the Treaty.

---
rhe-ex417_921.htm



Exhibit 4.17





 



 

 


							
	
BALLOON ADDENDUM
	
DCN: 753AE5030AC3CE5C00A0BDC6362B3C88
	
DATE

09/30/2021

	
DEBTOR'S NAME(S)
	
LENDER'S NAME

	
COOSA NURSING ADK, LLC
	
The Exchange Bank of Alabama

	
DEBTOR'S ADDRESS
	
LENDER'S ADDRESS

	
454 Satelllite Blvd NW 
Suwanee, GA 30024
	
PO Box 1100

Gadsden, AL 35902

	
NOTE NUMBER

577832
	
PRINCIPAL AMOUNT

$5,146,391.81
	
RATE

3.9500 %
	
MATURITY DATE

10/10/2026




COLLATERAL:

ALL ASSETS

513 Pineview Ave Glencoe, AL 35905

See exhibit "A" for legal description made a part hereof the same as if fully set out herein.

This loan is payable in full on the maturity date specified above. You must repay the entire principal balance of the loan and unpaid interest then due. The bank is under no obligation to refinance the loan at that time. You will, therefore, be required to make payment out of other assets that you may own, or you will have to find a lender, which may be the bank you have this loan with, willing to lend you the money. If you refinance this loan at maturity, you may have to pay some or all of the closing costs normally associated with a new loan even if you obtain refinancing from the same bank.

IN WITNESS HEREOF, the parties have affixed their signatures and seals this day.





 

 

 

 

 

 

 

DEBTOR'S SIGNATURE(S)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
 
 

Brent Morrison,Manager of COOSA NURSING ADK, LLCBenjamin A Waites, Manager of COOSA NURSING ADK, LLC
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News

DOD, Coast Guard Continue Support to Maui August 23, 2023 — Nearly 700 Defense Department personnel and 157 Coast Guardsmen are currently engaged with the U.S. Army Pacific Command and Joint Task Force 5-0 mission... MORE 

----

Oregon's Adjutant General Visits New School, Emergency Shelter in VietnamOctober 22, 2015 — QUANG NAM PROVINCE, Vietnam -- Oregon National Guard Brig. Gen. Michael E. Stencel, Adjutant General, Oregon, participated as the senior U.S. representative during a ribbon cutting ceremony, October... MORE 

----

2024 (327)2023 (825)2022 (1193)2021 (1066)2020 (1083)2019 (1166)2018 (1116)2017 (1356)2016 (1475)2015 (1408)2014 (904)2013 (32)2012 (4)

About DoDDoD CareersJoin the MilitaryNewsUSA.govPhotos & VideosPrivacy & SecurityTop Issues

US INDOPACOM Inspector GeneralDoD Inspector General Accessibility/Section 508DoD FOIAUS INDOPACOM FOIALink DisclaimerNo FEAR ActRecovery ActINDOPACOM Webmaster

                  - Facebook
                  - X
                  - YouTube
                  - Instagram
                  - RSS

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
### **CHAPTER 225—[Reserved]**

Sec.
3271.
[Reserved].

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**2021**—Pub. L. 117–81, div. A, title XVII, §1701(i)(3), Dec. 27, 2021, 135 Stat. 2141, amended Pub. L. 116–283, div. A, title XVIII, §1813(h), Jan. 1, 2021, 134 Stat. 4181, which added this analysis, by substituting "[Reserved]" for "PLANNING AND SOLICITATION RELATING TO PARTICULAR ITEMS OR SERVICES" in chapter heading.
### §8584. Age of retirement

A civilian member may be retired at any time after his sixty-fifth birthday, and shall be retired by June 30 following that birthday. However, in any special case the Secretary of the Navy may defer the retirement of a member until a date not later than the member's seventieth birthday.

(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 439, §7084; renumbered §8584, Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, §807(c)(1), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1836.)

| Revised section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 7084 | 34 U.S.C. 1073b. | Jan. 16, 1936, ch. 3, §3, 49 Stat. 1092. |

The words "individual and" are omitted as surplusage.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–232 renumbered section 7084 of this title as this section.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2018 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 115–232 effective Feb. 1, 2019, with provision for the coordination of amendments and special rule for certain redesignations, see section 800 of Pub. L. 115–232, set out as a note preceding section 3001 of this title.
EXHIBIT 23.1


CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM ENGINEERS AND GEOLOGISTS


As independent petroleum engineers, we hereby consent to the inclusion or incorporation by reference in the Amendment No. 1 to the Registration Statement on Form S-3 (No. 333-189394) and the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Pacific Coast Oil Trust of the information from our firm’s reserves report dated February 27, 2015 and all references to our firm included in or made part of the Pacific Coast Trust Annual Report on Form 10-K.


NETHERLAND, SEWELL & ASSOCIATES, INC.











By:  /s/ Danny D. Simmons


Danny D. Simmons, P.E.


President and Chief Operating Officer








Houston, Texas


March 12, 2015
|   |   Prudential Asset Resources Prudential Mortgage Capital Company2100 Ross Avenue, Suite 2500, Dallas TX 75201Tel 214 777-4500 A business of Prudential Financial, Inc. |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| RE:  | Multifamily Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates: Series WFRBS 2012-C6Period:   January 1, 2013 to December 31, 2013 |
|-----------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |   |                             |
|--------|--------|----------------------------------|
|   |   |                             |   |
|   |   | /s/ Hal Collett             |   |
|   |   | Hal Collett                 |   |
|   |   | President and Managing Director  |   |
|   |   | Prudential Asset Resources, Inc. |   |
#### § 2.706 When must I file my statement of reasons?

You must submit your statement of reasons to the reviewing official and interested parties no later than 10 days after filing your Notice of Appeal.
# C_2006165EN.01002201.xml

| 15.7.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 165/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.7.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 165/22

---

Action brought on 24 May 2006 — Commission of the European Communities v Republic of Austria

(Case C-235/06)

(2006/C 165/41)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: G. Braun and R. Vidal Puig, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Republic of Austria

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | declare that, by failing to lay down sanctions within the meaning of Article 16 of Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004 establishing common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights, and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 295/91 (1), the Republic of Austria has failed to fulfil its obligations under that regulation; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare that, by failing to lay down sanctions within the meaning of Article 16 of Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004 establishing common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights, and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 295/91 (1), the Republic of Austria has failed to fulfil its obligations under that regulation;

1

| — | order the Republic of Austria to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Republic of Austria to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Article 16 of Regulation No 261/2004 provides that, in the event that no compensation is paid, no re-routing offered or no right to reimbursement granted, sanctions are to be imposed on airlines. The sanctions laid down by the Member States for infringements of the regulation must be effective, proportionate and dissuasive.

According to the information available to the Commission, Austria has not yet laid down effective, proportionate and dissuasive sanctions for infringements of the regulation.

---

(1)  OJ L 46 of 17.2.2004, p. 1.

1

---
### §8328. Computation of years of service: voluntary retirement

(a) Enlisted Members.—Time required to be made up under section 972(a) of this title after February 10, 1996, may not be counted in computing years of service under this chapter.

(b) Officers.—Section 972(b) of this title excludes from computation of an officer's years of service for purposes of this chapter any time identified with respect to that officer under that section.

(c) Time Spent in Seaman to Admiral Program.—The months of active service in pursuit of a baccalaureate-level degree under the Seaman to Admiral (STA–21) program of the Navy of officer candidates selected for the program on or after October 28, 2009, shall be excluded in computing the years of service of an officer who was appointed to the grade of ensign in the Navy upon completion of the program to determine the eligibility of the officer for retirement, unless the officer becomes subject to involuntary separation or retirement due to physical disability. Such active service shall be counted in computing the years of active service of the officer for all other purposes.

(Added Pub. L. 104–106, div. A, title V, §561(d)(3)(A), Feb. 10, 1996, 110 Stat. 322, §6328; amended Pub. L. 107–107, div. A, title X, §1048(c)(13), Dec. 28, 2001, 115 Stat. 1226; Pub. L. 111–84, div. A, title V, §505, Oct. 28, 2009, 123 Stat. 2277; Pub. L. 113–291, div. A, title X, §1071(e)(5), Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3510; renumbered §8328, Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, §807(b)(15), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1836.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–232 renumbered section 6328 of this title as this section.

2014—Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 113–291 substituted "on or after October 28, 2009," for "on or after the date of the enactment of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010".

2009—Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 111–84 added subsec. (c).

2001—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 107–107 substituted "February 10, 1996," for "the date of the enactment of this section".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2018 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 115–232 effective Feb. 1, 2019, with provision for the coordination of amendments and special rule for certain redesignations, see section 800 of Pub. L. 115–232, set out as a note preceding section 3001 of this title.

#### Effective Date

Section effective Feb. 10, 1996, and applicable to any period of time covered by section 972 of this title that occurs after that date, see section 561(e) of Pub. L. 104–106, set out as an Effective Date of 1996 Amendment note under section 972 of this title.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Francisco Navedo, Appellant.

[823 NYS2d 750]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Bonnie G. Wittner, J.), rendered on or about October 3, 2003, unanimously affirmed. No opinion. Order filed. Concur—Friedman, J.E, Williams, Gonzalez, Sweeny and McGuire, JJ.