10012 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 36 / Wednesday, February 23, 2011 / Notices 

POLICIES AND PRACTICES FOR STORING, 

RETRIEVING, ACCESSING, RETAINING, AND

DISPOSING OF RECORDS IN THE SYSTEM: 

STORAGE: 

Maintained on electronic storage 

media and/or in file binders/cabinets. 

RETRIEVABILITY: 

Retrieved by name and or last four 

digits of SSN. 

SAFEGUARDS: 

Records are accessed by the custodian 

of the record system and by individuals 

responsible for servicing the record 

system in performance of their official 

duties and who are properly screened 

and cleared for need-to-know. Records 

are stored electronically and/or in 

locked cabinets or rooms. Electronic 

media is accessed by a Common Access 

Card (CAC). 

RETENTION AND DISPOSAL: 

Retained for one year after decision 

made to select individual for 

consideration of continued service in 

the Air Force. Paper records are 

destroyed by tearing into pieces, 

shredding, pulping, macerating, or 

burning and electronic records are 

destroyed by magnetic erasing. 

SYSTEM MANAGER(S) AND ADDRESS: 

Headquarters Air Force Personnel 

Center, Directorate of Personnel 

Services, Enlisted Skills Management 

Branch (HQ AFPC/DPSOA), 550 C 

Street West, Suite 10, Randolph Air 

Force Base, TX 78150–4712. 

NOTIFICATION PROCEDURES: 

Individuals seeking to determine 

whether this system of records contains 

information on themselves should 

address written inquiries to the 

servicing military personnel section or 

visit the servicing military personnel 

section. Official mailing addresses are 

published as an appendix to the Air 

Force’s compilation of systems of 

records notices. 

For verification purposes, individual 

should provide their full name, SSN, 

any details which may assist in locating 

records, and their signature. 

In addition, the requester must 

provide a notarized statement or an 

unsworn declaration made in 

accordance with 28 U.S.C. 1746, in the 

following format: 

If executed outside the United States: 

‘I declare (or certify, verify, or state) 

under penalty of perjury under the laws 

of the United States of America that the 

foregoing is true and correct. Executed 

on (date). (Signature)’. 

If executed within the United States, 

its territories, possessions, or 

commonwealths: ‘I declare (or certify, 

verify, or state) under penalty of perjury 

that the foregoing is true and correct. 

Executed on (date). (Signature)’. 

RECORD ACCESS PROCEDURES: 

Individuals seeking to access records 

about themselves contained in this 

system should address requests to the 

servicing military personnel section or 

visit the servicing military personnel 

section. Official mailing addresses are 

published as an appendix to the Air 

Force’s compilation of systems of 

records notices. 

For verification purposes, individual 

should provide their full name, SSN, 

any details which may assist in locating 

records, and their signature. 

In addition, the requester must 

provide a notarized statement or an 

unsworn declaration made in 

accordance with 28 U.S.C. 1746, in the 

following format: 

If executed outside the United States: 

‘I declare (or certify, verify, or state) 

under penalty of perjury under the laws 

of the United States of America that the 

foregoing is true and correct. Executed 

on (date). (Signature)’. 

If executed within the United States, 

its territories, possessions, or 

commonwealths: ‘I declare (or certify, 

verify, or state) under penalty of perjury 

that the foregoing is true and correct. 

Executed on (date). (Signature)’. 

CONTESTING RECORD PROCEDURES: 

The Air Force rules for accessing 

records and for contesting contents and 

appealing initial agency determinations 

are published in 32 CFR part 806b, Air 

Force Instruction 33–332, Air Force 

Privacy Program and may be obtained 

from the system manager. 

RECORD SOURCE CATEGORIES: 

Entries are made by the supervisor 

and commander, and acknowledged by 

the member. 

EXEMPTIONS CLAIMED FOR THE SYSTEM: 

None. 

[FR Doc. 2011–3972 Filed 2–22–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 5001–06–P 

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 

Department of the Navy 

Notice of Availability of the Draft 

Supplemental Environmental Impact 

Statement for the Disposal and Reuse 

of Hunters Point Naval Shipyard, San 

Francisco, CA, and To Announce 

Public Hearings 

AGENCY: Department of the Navy, DoD. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: Pursuant to Section 102(2)(C) 

of the National Environmental Policy 

Act (NEPA) of 1969, as implemented by 

the Council on Environmental Quality 

regulations (40 CFR parts 1500–1508), 

the Department of the Navy (Navy) has 

prepared and filed the Draft 

Supplemental Environmental Impact 

Statement (SEIS) evaluating the 

potential environmental consequences 

associated with the disposal and reuse 

of Hunters Point Naval Shipyard (HPS), 

San Francisco, California. The Navy is 

required to dispose of HPS per Public 

Law 101–510, the Defense Base Closure 

and Realignment Act of 1990, as 

amended. A public hearing will be held 

to provide information and receive oral 

and written comments on the Draft 

SEIS. Federal, State, and local agencies 

and interested individuals are invited to 

be present or represented at the hearing. 

Dates and Addresses: One public 

hearing will be held. The hearing will 

be preceded by an open information 

session to allow interested individuals 

to review information presented in the 

Draft SEIS. Navy representatives will be 

available during the information session 

to provide clarification as necessary 

related to the Draft SEIS. The public 

hearing is scheduled as follows: 

Tuesday, March 15, 2011, from 6:30 

p.m. to 8:30 p.m. at the Southeast 

Community Facility Community Center, 

Alex L. Pitcher, Jr. Community Room, 

1800 Oakdale Avenue, San Francisco, 

California 94124. The open information 

session will be held on the same date 

and at the same location, from 5:30 p.m. 

to 6:30 p.m. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Director, BRAC PMO West, Attn: Mr. 

Ronald Bochenek, 1455 Frazee Road, 

Suite 900, San Diego, CA 92108–4310, 

telephone 619–532–0906, fax 619–532– 

9858, e-mail: 

ronald.bochenek.ctr@navy.mil. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Navy, 

as lead agency, has prepared and filed 

the Draft SEIS for the Disposal and 

Reuse of Hunters Point Shipyard, San 

Francisco, California in accordance with 

the requirements of the NEPA of 1969 

(42 U.S.C. 4321–4345) and its 

implementing regulations (40 CFR parts 

1500–1508). A Notice of Intent (NOI) for 

the SEIS was published in the Federal 

Register on September 5, 2008 (Federal 

Register/Vol. 73, No. 173 pgs 51797 & 

51798/Friday, September 5, 2008/ 

Notices). The purpose of the proposed 

action is the disposal of HPS from 

Federal ownership (864 acres [421 acres 

dry land & 443 acres submerged]) and 

its subsequent reuse by the County and 

City of San Francisco in a manner 

consistent with the Hunters Point Naval 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES

Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 36 / Wednesday, February 23, 2011 / Notices 10013 

Shipyard Redevelopment Plan as 

developed by the San Francisco 

Redevelopment Agency (SFRA) in July 

1997, and amended in August 2010. The 

Navy is required to close HPS in 

accordance with Public Law 101–510, 

the Defense Base Closure and 

Realignment Act of 1990, as amended. 

In accordance with NEPA, before 

disposing of any real property, the Navy 

must analyze the environmental effects 

of the disposal of the HPS property. The 

Draft SEIS has identified and considered 

six reuse alternatives for HPS and a no 

action alternative. Navy disposal is 

assumed as part of each reuse 

alternative. The no action alternative 

assumes retention of the HPS property 

by the Government in a ‘‘caretaker 

status’’ and no reuse or redevelopment. 

Alternative 1, Stadium Plan 

Alternative, would redevelop HPS with 

a wide range of uses including a mixeduse community with 2,650 residential 

units, retail (125,000 square feet (sq ft)), 

research and development (R&D) (2.5 

million sq ft), community services 

(50,000 sq ft), and parks and 

recreational open space (232 acres). A 

major component would include a new 

69,000-seat football stadium. This 

alternative would also include a 300- 

slip marina, improvements to stabilize 

the shoreline, and a new bridge over 

Yosemite Slough. New infrastructure 

would serve the development as 

necessary. 

Alternative 1A (the ‘‘Stadium Plan/No 

Bridge Alternative’’) includes the 

disposal of HPS by the Navy and its 

reuse with the same level, land use 

types, and density of development as 

Alternative 1, except that the Yosemite 

Slough bridge would not be constructed. 

Alternative 2 (the ‘‘Non-Stadium Plan/ 

Additional R&D Alternative’’) includes 

many of the same components as 

Alternative 1 including 2,650 residential 

units, retail (125,000 sq ft), community 

services (50,000 sq ft), and parks and 

recreational open space (222 acres), a 

300-slip marina, improvements to 

stabilize the shoreline, and a new bridge 

over Yosemite Slough. Under this 

alternative, a new football stadium 

would not be constructed. Instead, an 

additional 2.5 million sq ft, for a total 

of 5 million sq ft, of R&D space would 

be developed. 

Alternative 2A (the ‘‘Non-Stadium 

Plan/Housing and R&D Alternative’’) 

includes a mix of uses including 4,275 

residential units, retail (125,000 sq ft), 

R&D (3 million sq ft), community 

services (50,000 sq ft), and parks and 

recreational open space (222 acres). This 

alternative would also include a 300- 

slip marina, improvements to stabilize 

the shoreline, and a new bridge over 

Yosemite Slough. No new football 

stadium would be constructed. 

Alternative 3 (the ‘‘Non-Stadium Plan/ 

Additional Housing Alternative’’) does 

not include a new stadium, but is 

comprised of a mix of land uses 

including 4,000 residential units, retail 

(125,000 sq ft), R&D (2.5 million sq ft), 

community services (50,000 sq ft), and 

parks and recreational open space (245 

acres). The alternative also includes a 

300-slip marina, improvements to 

stabilize the shoreline, and a new bridge 

over Yosemite Slough. 

Alternative 4 (‘‘the Non-Stadium Plan/ 

Reduced Development Alternative’’) 

includes a reduced density of 

development. Development proposed 

under this alternative includes 1,855 

residential units, retail (87,500 sq ft), 

R&D (1.75 million sq ft), community 

services (50,000 sq ft), and parks and 

recreational open space (245 acres). This 

alternative does not include a new 

stadium, a bridge over Yosemite Slough, 

a marina, or shoreline stabilization. 

The ‘‘No Action Alternative’’ is 

required by NEPA and evaluates the 

impacts at HPS in the event that the 

property is not disposed. Under this 

alternative the property would be 

retained by the Navy in caretaker status. 

Existing leases would continue until 

they expire or are terminated, and no 

new leases would be entered into. No 

reuse or redevelopment would occur 

under this alternative. 

For each alternative, the Draft SEIS 

addresses the potential direct, indirect, 

short-term, and long-term impacts on 

the human and natural environments, 

including the following resource areas: 

Transportation, traffic, and circulation; 

air quality and greenhouse gases; noise; 

land use and recreation; visual 

resources and aesthetics; 

socioeconomics; hazards and hazardous 

substances; geology and soils; water 

resources; utilities; public services; 

cultural resources; biological resources; 

and environmental justice. The analysis 

also includes an analysis of cumulative 

impacts from other reasonably 

foreseeable Federal, State, or local 

activities at and around HPS. 

The Navy conducted a public scoping 

period from September 5 to October 17, 

2008, and held a public scoping meeting 

on September 23, 2008, to identify 

community concerns and local issues 

that should be addressed in the SEIS. 

Federal, State, and local agencies and 

interested parties provided oral and 

written comments to the Navy and 

identified specific issues or topics of 

environmental concern that should be 

addressed in the SEIS. In addition, the 

Navy facilitated additional community 

outreach activities to solicit comments 

and concerns from interested 

community groups in 2009. The Navy 

considered the scoping and outreach 

comments in determining the scope of 

the SEIS. 

Federal, State, and local agencies, as 

well as interested parties, are invited 

and encouraged to review and comment 

on the Draft SEIS. Comments can be 

made in the following ways: (1) Oral 

statements or written comments at the 

scheduled public hearing; or (2) written 

comments mailed to the BRAC PMO 

address in this notice; or (3) written 

comments faxed to the BRAC PMO fax 

number in this notice; or (4) comments 

submitted via e-mail using the BRAC 

PMO e-mail address in this notice. 

The Draft SEIS has been distributed to 

various Federal, State, local agencies, 

and Native American tribes, as well as 

other interested individuals and 

organizations. In addition, copies of the 

Draft SEIS have been distributed to the 

following libraries and publicly 

accessible facilities for public review: 

1. San Francisco Main Library, 100 

Larkin Street, San Francisco, CA 94102. 

2. San Francisco State University 

Library, 1360 Holloway Avenue, San 

Francisco, CA 94132. 

3. Hastings Law Library, UC Hastings 

College of the Law, 200 McAllister 

Street, 4th Floor, San Francisco, CA 

94102. 

4. Jonsson Library of Government 

Documents, Cecil H. Green Library, Bing 

Wing, Stanford, CA 94305–6004. 

5. Institute of Governmental Studies 

Library, UC Berkeley, 109 Moses Hall, 

#2370, Berkeley, CA 94720. 

6. San Francisco Redevelopment 

Agency (By Appointment), One South 

Van Ness Avenue, Fifth Floor, San 

Francisco, CA 94103. 

7. City Planning Department (By 

Appointment), 1650 Mission Street, 

Fourth Floor, San Francisco, CA 94103. 

An electronic copy of the Draft SEIS 

is also available for public viewing at 

http://www.bracpmo.navy.mil. 

Equal weight will be given to 

comments received at the scheduled 

public hearing and those directly 

forwarded to BRAC PMO. In the interest 

of available time, and to ensure all who 

wish to give oral statements at the 

public hearing the opportunity to do so, 

each speaker’s comments will be limited 

to three minutes. If a longer statement 

is to be presented, it should be 

summarized at the public hearing and 

the full text submitted in writing either 

at the hearing or mailed or e-mailed to 

the below address. To ensure the 

accuracy of the record, all statements 

presented orally at the public hearings 

should be submitted in writing. 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES

10014 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 36 / Wednesday, February 23, 2011 / Notices 

Comments can be submitted in 

writing or e-mailed to: Director, BRAC 

PMO West, Attn. Mr. Ronald Bochenek, 

1455 Frazee Road, Suite 900, San Diego, 

CA 92108–4310, telephone 619–532– 

0906, fax 619–532–9858, e-mail: 

ronald.bochenek.ctr@navy.mil. 

To be considered, all comments must 

be received by Tuesday, April 12, 2011. 

Such comments will become part of the 

public record and will be responded to 

in the Final SEIS. 

Requests for special assistance, sign 

language interpretation for the hearing 

impaired, language interpreters, or other 

auxiliary aids for the scheduled public 

hearing must be sent by mail or e-mail 

to BRAC PMO West, Attn: Mr. Ronald 

Bochenek, 1455 Frazee Road, Suite 900, 

San Diego, CA 92108–4310, e-mail: 

ronald.bochenek.ctr@navy.mil. 

Dated: February 15, 2011. 

D.J. Werner, 

Lieutenant Commander, Judge Advocate 

General’s Corps, U.S. Navy, Federal Register 

Liaison Officer. 

[FR Doc. 2011–3966 Filed 2–22–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3810–FF–P 

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION 

Predominantly Black Institutions 

Competitive Grant Program; Office of 

Postsecondary Education; Overview 

Information; Predominantly Black 

Institutions Competitive Grant 

Program; Notice Inviting Applications 

for New Awards Using Fiscal Year (FY) 

2010 Funds 

Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance 

(CFDA) Number: 84.382A. 

Dates: Applications Available: 

February 23, 2011. 

Deadline for Transmittal of 

Applications: April 25, 2011. 

Deadline for Intergovernmental 

Review: June 23, 2011. 

Full Text of Announcement 

I. Funding Opportunity Description 

Purpose of Program: The purpose of 

the Predominantly Black Institutions 

(PBI) Program is to strengthen PBIs to 

carry out programs in the following 

areas: science, technology, engineering, 

or mathematics (STEM); health 

education; internationalization or 

globalization; teacher preparation; or 

improving educational outcomes of 

African-American males. 

Priorities: These priorities are from 

the notice of final supplemental 

priorities and definitions for 

discretionary grant programs, published 

in the Federal Register on December 15, 

2010 (75 FR 78486). 

Competitive Preference Priorities: For 

FY 2011, these priorities are competitive 

preference priorities. Under 34 CFR 

75.105(c)(2)(i), we award an additional 

two and a half points to an application 

that meets one of the priorities, or an 

additional five points to an application 

that meets both of these priorities. 

These priorities are: 

1. Increasing Postsecondary Success 

Increasing the number and proportion 

of high-need students (as defined in this 

notice) who persist in and complete 

college or other postsecondary 

education and training; and 

2. Enabling More Data-Based DecisionMaking 

Projects that are designed to collect 

(or obtain), analyze, and use highquality and timely data, including data 

on program participant outcomes, in 

accordance with privacy requirements 

(as defined in this notice), in the 

following priority area: 

Improving postsecondary student 

outcomes relating to enrollment, 

persistence, and completion and leading 

to career success. 

Definitions: These definitions are 

from the notice of final supplemental 

priorities and definitions for 

discretionary grant programs, published 

in the Federal Register on December 15, 

2010 (75 FR 78486). 

High-need children and high-need 

students means children and students at 

risk of educational failure, such as 

children and students who are living in 

poverty, who are English learners, who 

are far below grade level or who are not 

on track to becoming college- or careerready by graduation, who have left 

school or college before receiving, 

respectively, a regular high school 

diploma or a college degree or 

certificate, who are at risk of not 

graduating with a diploma on time, who 

are homeless, who are in foster care, 

who are pregnant or parenting 

teenagers, who have been incarcerated, 

who are new immigrants, who are 

migrant, or who have disabilities. 

Privacy requirements means the 

requirements of the Family Educational 

Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA), 20 

U.S.C. 1232g, and its implementing 

regulations in 34 CFR part 99, the 

Privacy Act, 5 U.S.C. 552a, as well as all 

applicable Federal, State and local 

requirements regarding privacy. 

Program Authority: Title III, part F, 

section 371 of the Higher Education Act 

of 1965, as amended (HEA) (20 U.S.C. 

1067q). 

Applicable Regulations: (a) The 

Education Department General 

Administrative Regulations (EDGAR) in 

34 CFR parts 74, 75, 77, 79, 82, 84, 85, 

86, 97, 98, and 99. (b) The notice of final 

supplemental priorities and definitions 

for discretionary grant programs, 

published in the Federal Register on 

December 15, 2010 (75 FR 78486). 

II. Award Information 

Type of Award: Discretionary grants. 

Estimated Available Funds: 

$15,000,000. 

Note: Funds appropriated for this program 

for FY 2010 remain available for obligation 

in FY 2011 pursuant to 20 U.S.C. 

1067q(b)(1)(B)). 

Estimated Average Size of Awards: 

$600,000. 

Estimated Number of Awards: 25. 

Note: The Department is not bound by any 

estimates in this notice. 

Project Period: Up to 48 months. 

III. Eligibility Information 

1. Eligible Applicants: To be eligible 

to apply, an institution of higher 

education (IHE) must have submitted 

the ‘‘Application for Designation as an 

Eligible Institution’’ and must have 

received FY 2010 designation as an 

eligible institution for programs under 

title III and title V of the HEA. The 

original deadline for applying for 

designation as an eligible institution 

was January 6, 2010. (74 FR 64059– 

64062). However, the FY 2010 eligibility 

process was reopened with an 

application deadline of September 13, 

2010 for PBIs (and certain other 

institutions) to allow maximum 

participation of potentially eligible 

applicants (74 FR 49484). The 

regulations explaining the standards for 

designation can be found in 34 CFR 

607.2 through 607.5. In addition, an 

applicant must— 

(a) Have an enrollment of needy 

students, as defined by section 371(c)(3) 

of the HEA (20 U.S.C. 1067q(c)(3)). The 

term enrollment of needy students 

means the enrollment at the eligible IHE 

with respect to which not less than 50 

percent of the undergraduate students 

enrolled in an academic program 

leading to a degree— 

(i) In the second fiscal year preceding 

the fiscal year for which the 

determination is made, were Federal 

Pell Grant recipients for such year; 

(ii) Come from families that receive 

benefits under a means-tested Federal 

benefit program (as defined in section 

371(c)(5) of the HEA, 20 U.S.C. 

1067q(c)(5)); 

(iii) Attended a public or nonprofit 

private secondary school that— 

(A) Is in the school district of a local 

educational agency that was eligible for 

assistance under part A of title I of the 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES