alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §2865. Work in Process Curve charts and outlay tables for military construction projects

Along with the budget for each fiscal year submitted by the President pursuant to section 1105(a) of title 31, United States Code, the Secretary of Defense and the Secretaries of the military departments shall include for any military construction project over $90,000,000, as an addendum to be included within the same document as the 1391s for the Military Construction Program budget documentation, a Project Spending Plan that includes—

(1) a Work in Process Curve chart to identify funding, obligations, and outlay figures; and

(2) a monthly outlay table for funding, obligations, and outlay figures.

(Added Pub. L. 115–232, div. B, title XXVIII, §2806(a)(1), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 2264.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 2865, added Pub. L. 101–510, div. B, title XXVIII, §2851(a), Nov. 5, 1990, 104 Stat. 1803; amended Pub. L. 102–484, div. B, title XXVIII, §2801, Oct. 23, 1992, 106 Stat. 2604; Pub. L. 103–160, div. B, title XXVIII, §2804, Nov. 30, 1993, 107 Stat. 1885; Pub. L. 103–337, div. A, title X, §1070(a)(14), Oct. 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 2856; Pub. L. 104–106, div. A, title XV, §1502(a)(27), div. B, title XXVIII, §2819, Feb. 10, 1996, 110 Stat. 506, 555; Pub. L. 105–85, div. A, title III, §371(d)(2), div. B, title XXVIII, §2804(a), Nov. 18, 1997, 111 Stat. 1706, 1990; Pub. L. 107–314, div. B, title XXVIII, §2805, Dec. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 2705; Pub. L. 108–136, div. A, title X, §1031(a)(47), div. B, title XXVIII, §2812(a), Nov. 24, 2003, 117 Stat. 1602, 1725, related to energy savings at military installations, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 109–364, div. B, title XXVIII, §2851(a)(2), Oct. 17, 2006, 120 Stat. 2494.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Department of Defense Guidance

Pub. L. 115–232, div. B, title XXVIII, §2806(b), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 2264, provided that: "The Secretary of Defense shall, in coordination with the Under Secretary of Defense (Comptroller), update Department of Defense Financial Management Regulation 7000.14–R, and any other appropriate instructions and guidance, to ensure that the Department of Defense takes appropriate actions to comply with section 2865 of title 10, United States Code, as added by this section."
### §8297. Additional awards

Not more than one Navy cross, distinguished-service medal, silver star medal, distinguished flying cross, or Navy and Marine Corps Medal may be awarded to a person. However, for each succeeding act or service that would otherwise justify the award of such a medal or cross, the President may award a suitable bar, emblem, or insignia to be worn with the decoration and corresponding rosette or other device.

(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 390, §6247; Pub. L. 113–66, div. A, title V, §561(b), Dec. 26, 2013, 127 Stat. 766; renumbered §8297, Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, §807(b)(13), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1836.)

| Revised section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 6247 | 34 U.S.C. 358. | Feb. 4, 1919, ch. 14, §5, 40 Stat. 1056; renumbered §7 and amended Aug. 7, 1942, ch. 551, §1, 56 Stat. 744. |
| | 34 U.S.C. 364a (2d sentence). | July 2, 1926, ch. 721, §12 (2d sentence), 44 Stat. 789; July 30, 1937, ch. 545, §4, 50 Stat. 549. |

The word "awarded" is substituted for the word "issued" for uniformity. The words "that would otherwise justify" are substituted for the words "sufficient to justify" for clarity. The word "service" is substituted for the word "achievement" for uniformity. The words "as he shall direct" are omitted as surplusage.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 8297, acts Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 510; Aug. 21, 1957, Pub. L. 85–155, title III, §301(8), 71 Stat. 387; July 12, 1960, Pub. L. 86–616, §6(1), 74 Stat. 391, provided for selection boards to recommend promotion-list officers and brigadier generals of Regular Air Force for promotion in Regular Air Force, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 96–513, title II, §204, Dec. 12, 1980, 94 Stat. 2880, effective Sept. 15, 1981. See section 611 et seq. of this title.

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–232 renumbered section 6247 of this title as this section.

2013—Pub. L. 113–66 struck out "medal of honor," before "Navy cross".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2018 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 115–232 effective Feb. 1, 2019, with provision for the coordination of amendments and special rule for certain redesignations, see section 800 of Pub. L. 115–232, set out as a note preceding section 3001 of this title.
### §773. When distinctive insignia required

(a) A person for whom one of the following uniforms is prescribed may wear it, if it includes distinctive insignia prescribed by the Secretary of the military department concerned to distinguish it from the uniform of the Army, Navy, Air Force, Marine Corps, or Space Force, as the case may be:

(1) The uniform prescribed by the university, college, or school for an instructor or member of the organized cadet corps of—

(A) a State university or college, or a public high school, having a regular course of military instruction; or

(B) an educational institution having a regular course of military instruction, and having a member of the Army, Navy, Air Force, Marine Corps, or Space Force as instructor in military science and tactics.

(2) The uniform prescribed by a military society composed of persons discharged honorably or under honorable conditions from the Army, Navy, Air Force, Marine Corps, or Space Force to be worn by a member of that society when authorized by regulations prescribed by the President.

(b) A uniform prescribed under subsection (a) may not include insignia of grade the same as, or similar to, those prescribed for officers of the Army, Navy, Air Force, Marine Corps, or Space Force.

(c) Under such regulations as the Secretary of the military department concerned may prescribe, any person who is permitted to attend a course of instruction prescribed for members of a reserve officers' training corps, and who is not a member of that corps, may, while attending that course of instruction, wear the uniform of that corps.

(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 35; Pub. L. 85–355, Mar. 28, 1958, 72 Stat. 66; Pub. L. 116–283, div. A, title IX, §924(b)(3)(P), Jan. 1, 2021, 134 Stat. 3821.)

| Revised section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 773(a)   773(b) | 10:1393 (words between 4th and 7th semicolons of 1st proviso, and 2d proviso, of 1st par.).10:1393 (last proviso of 1st par.). | June 3, 1916, ch. 134, §125 (words between 4th and 7th semicolons of 1st proviso, and 2d and last provisos, of 1st par.), 39 Stat. 216; June 4, 1920, ch. 228, §8, 41 Stat. 836; Sept. 15, 1951, ch. 402, 65 Stat. 323; July 6, 1953, ch. 180, §1, 67 Stat. 140. |

773(b)

10:1393 (last proviso of 1st par.).

In subsection (a), the word "mark" is omitted as surplusage.

In subsection (a)(2), the words "persons discharged honorably or under honorable conditions from" are substituted for the words "entirely of honorably discharged officers or enlisted men, or both, of". The words "Regular or Volunteer" are omitted as surplusage. The words "when authorized by regulations prescribed by" are substituted for the words "upon occasions authorized by regulations of".

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2021—Subsecs. (a), (b). Pub. L. 116–283 substituted "Marine Corps, or Space Force" for "or Marine Corps" in subsec. (a) wherever appearing and in subsec. (b).

1958—Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 85–355 added subsec. (c).
Order entered January 31, 2022

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05 - 21 - 00632 - CV JENNIFER PARKS, ET AL., Appellant s

V. FORD MOTOR COMPANY , Appellee On Appeal from the 429th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 429 - 03411 - 2021

O RDER Before the Court is appellee’s January 28, 2022 unopposed second motion for an extension of time to file its brief. We GRANT the motion and extend the time to March 2, 2022 . We caution appellee that further extension requests will be disfavored.

/s/ BONNIE LEE GOLDSTEIN JUSTICE
### Marine geology of Guam

By: K.O. Emery

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/pp403B

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plate:  **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
### §7562. Clothing

The President may prescribe the quantity and kind of clothing to be issued annually to members of the Army.

(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 256, §4562; renumbered §7562, Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, §808(d), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1839.)

| Revised section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 4562 | 10:831. | R.S. 1296 (less 1st 9 words). |

The words "members of the Army" are substituted for the words "troops of the United States".

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–232 renumbered section 4562 of this title as this section.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2018 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 115–232 effective Feb. 1, 2019, with provision for the coordination of amendments and special rule for certain redesignations, see section 800 of Pub. L. 115–232, set out as a note preceding section 3001 of this title.
§ 20.312 What amounts will the Bureau deduct from income or other resources? The social services worker will deduct the following amounts from income, or other resources: ( a ) The first $2,000 of liquid resources annually available to the household;
( b ) Any home produce from a garden, livestock, and poultry used by the applicant or recipient and his/her household for their consumption; and
( c ) Resources specifically excluded by federal statute.
J.

(1996). We therefore conclude that the district court did not err in denying appellant's motion. Accordingly, we

ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.

Hardesty

cc: Hon. Abbi Silver, District Judge Darryl Orlandus Clark Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 2 (0) 1947A
#### LEONARD VAN WINGERDEN, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. LAFAYETTE TOWNSHIP, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey Appellate Division

Argued November 28, 2000

Decided December 19, 2000.

Before Judges PRESSLER, KESTIN and CIANCIA.

*Richard*/. *Clark, Sparta,*argued the cause for appellant *(Lad-dey, Clark & Ryan, attorneys; Mr. Clark,*on the brief).

*John T. Lynch,*Martinsville, argued the cause for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

This litigation concerns the interpretation and application of *N.J.S.A.*54:4-23.12a, a portion of the Farmland Assessment Act that exempts from property tax certain “single-use agricultural or horticultural facilities.” We have, previously held that the statute was not unconstitutional. *Van Wingerden v. Lafayette Township,*303 *N.J.Super.*614, 697 A.2d 565 (App.Div.), *certif. denied,*152 *N.J.*188, 704 A.2d 18 (1997). On remand to the Tax Court, the issue for resolution was whether a portion of the two attached greenhouses here under consideration, in the words of the statute, “encloses a space ... used for ... working, office or sales space” so as to preclude the tax exemption otherwise provided to a *206facility of this nature. In a detailed and well-reasoned opinion, Judge Kuskin analyzed the history and purpose of *N.J.S.A.*54:4-23.12a, applied the facts to the statutory provisions, and concluded that no disqualifying activity was present in the greenhouse complex under review. 18 *N.J.Tax*81 (Tax 1999).

We have reviewed the record and applicable law in light of the issues raised by appellant Lafayette Township. We are satisfied that Judge Kuskin’s factual determinations are unassailable. The judges of the Tax Court have special expertise and their findings will not be disturbed unless they are clearly arbitrary or not grounded in substantial evidence. *Glenpointe Assoc. v. Tp. of Teaneck,*241 *N.J.Super.*37, 46, 574 A.2d 459 (App.Div.), *certif.*denied, 122 *N.J.*391, 585 A.2d 392 (1990); *N.J.S.A.*2B:13-6. We are also in agreement with his legal analysis of the statute. In our view his application of the facts to the law was without error. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment in favor of plaintiff Leonard Van Wingerden, substantially for the reasons set forth by Judge Kuskin in his published opinion. *See also R.*2:11-3(e)(1)(A) and (E).

Affirmed.
#### § 2.512 May the Director of the Office of Hearings and Appeals take jurisdiction over a matter?

Yes. Nothing in this part will be construed as affecting the authority vested in the Director of the Office of Hearings and Appeals to take jurisdiction over matters in front of the IBIA, as provided in 43 CFR 4.5(b).
§ 141.34 Pawnbroker records. Each pawnbroker shall keep a written record of the following information: ( a ) Transaction number.
( b ) Name of pledgor.
( c ) Address of pledgor.
( d ) Census number or social security number of pledgor.
( e ) Date of transaction.
( f ) Replacement value of pawn.
( g ) Description of pawned item.
( h ) Amount loaned in cash.
( i ) Amount loaned as credit.
( j ) Finance charge.
( k ) Amount financed.
( l ) Date and amount of payments made by pledgor.
( m ) Date notice of default sent to pledgor.
( n ) Date pawned item sold.
( o ) Name and address of purchaser.
( p ) Amount received upon sale.
( q ) Amount of any surplus returned to the pledgor.
( r ) Such other information as the Commissioner may require.
§ 166.905 Who can get assistance for postgraduate studies? ( a ) The purpose of the postgraduate studies program is to enhance the professional and technical knowledge of Indian and Alaska Native natural resource and agriculture-related professionals working for an approved organization so that the best possible service is provided to Indian and Alaska Natives.
( b ) We may pay the cost of tuition, fees, books, and salary of Alaska Natives and Indians who are employed by an approved organization and who wish to pursue advanced levels of education in natural resource or agriculture-related fields.
( c ) The goal of the advanced study program is to encourage participants to obtain additional academic credentials such as a degree or diploma in a natural resources or agriculture-related field. Requirements of the postgraduate study program are: ( 1 ) The duration of course work cannot be less than one semester or more than three years; and
( 2 ) Students in the postgraduate studies program must meet performance standards as required by the graduate school offering the study program.
( d ) Program applicants must submit application packages to the education committee. At a minimum, such packages must contain a resume and an endorsement signed by the applicant's supervisor clearly stating the need for and benefits of the desired training.
( e ) The education committee must use the following criteria to select participants: ( 1 ) Need for the expertise sought at both the local and national levels;
( 2 ) Expected benefits, both locally and nationally; and
( 3 ) Years of experience and the service record of the employee.
( f ) Program participants will enter into an obligated service agreement to serve as a natural resources or agriculture-related professional with an approved organization for one year for each year in the program. We may reduce the obligated service requirement if the employee receives supplemental funding such as research grants, scholarships, or graduate stipends and, as a result, reduces the need for financial assistance under this part. If the obligated service agreement is breached, we will collect the amount owed us in accordance with § 166.910 of this subpart.
# C_2014092EN.01003701.xml

| 29.3.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 92/37 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.3.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 92/37

---

Corrigendum to Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the TFEU — Cases where the Commission raises no objections

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 50 of 21 February 2014
  )

Official Journal of the European Union C 50 of 21 February 2014

2014/C 92/10

On page 26, the text referring to the State Aid No SA.37666 is cancelled and replaced by the following:

‘Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the TFEU

Cases where the Commission raises no objections

(Text with EEA relevance, except for products falling under Annex I of the Treaty)

| Date of adoption of the decision | 16.12.2013 |
| --- | --- |
| Aid number | SA.37666 (2013/N) |
| Member State | Germany |
| Region | BAYERN | — |
| Title (and/or name of the beneficiary) | Bayern: Bayerisches Bergbauernprogramm, Teil B - Förderung der Weide- und Alm-/Alpwirschaft (BBP-B); |
| Legal basis | — | Richtlinien des Bayerischen Staatsministeriums für Ernährung, Landwirtschaft und Forsten für die Durchführung des Bayerischen Bergbauernprogramms (BBP-B)- 2011; Teil B: Förderung der Weide- und Alm-/Alpwirtschaft |

Date of adoption of the decision

16.12.2013

Aid number

SA.37666 (2013/N)

Member State

Germany

Region

BAYERN

—

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

Bayern: Bayerisches Bergbauernprogramm, Teil B - Förderung der Weide- und Alm-/Alpwirschaft (BBP-B);

Legal basis

—

Richtlinien des Bayerischen Staatsministeriums für Ernährung, Landwirtschaft und Forsten für die Durchführung des Bayerischen Bergbauernprogramms (BBP-B)- 2011; Teil B: Förderung der Weide- und Alm-/Alpwirtschaft

| — | Richtlinien des Bayerischen Staatsministeriums für Ernährung, Landwirtschaft und Forsten für die Durchführung des Bayerischen Bergbauernprogramms (BBP-B)- 2014; Teil B: Förderung der Weide- und Alm-/Alpwirtschaft |
| --- | --- |

—

Richtlinien des Bayerischen Staatsministeriums für Ernährung, Landwirtschaft und Forsten für die Durchführung des Bayerischen Bergbauernprogramms (BBP-B)- 2014; Teil B: Förderung der Weide- und Alm-/Alpwirtschaft

| — | Art 23 und 44 der BayHO einschl. Verwaltungsvorschriften |
| --- | --- |

—

Art 23 und 44 der BayHO einschl. Verwaltungsvorschriften

Type of measure

Scheme

—

Objective

Investments in agricultural holdings

Form of aid

Direct grant

Budget

| | Overall budget: EUR 6 (in millions) |
| --- | --- |

Overall budget: EUR 6 (in millions)

| | Annual budget: EUR 2 (in millions) |
| --- | --- |

Annual budget: EUR 2 (in millions)

Intensity

%

Duration (period)

01.01.2014 - 31.12.2016

Economic sectors

AGRICULTURE, FORESTRY AND FISHING

Name and address of the granting authority

Ämter für Ernährung, Landwirtschaft und Forsten Südliche Landkreise Bayerns

Other information

—

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

http://ec.europa.eu/competition/elojade/isef/index.cfm’

---
Editorial Note on Part 224
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 224 appear at 84 FR 69611, Dec. 18, 2019.

§ 224.67 What must the Secretary do upon the Secretary's receipt of a final proposed TERA? ( a ) Within 10 days of the Secretary's receipt of a final proposed TERA, the Secretary must submit a notice for publication in the Federal Register advising the public: ( 1 ) That the Secretary is considering a final proposed TERA for approval or disapproval: and
( 2 ) Of any National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) review the Secretary is conducting.
( b ) The Federal Register notice will: ( 1 ) Contain information advising the public how to request and receive copies of or participate in any NEPA reviews, as prescribed in subpart C of this part, related to approval of the final proposed TERA; and
( 2 ) Contain information advising the public how to comment on a final proposed TERA.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-1796

ERWIN B. PATTERSON, JR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

CITY OF CHESAPEAKE; COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA; STEPHEN E. MILLS; JOHN C. LUMPKIN P.C.; TEIDE ENTERPRISES, INCORPORATED; TOWNE BANK; CITY OF NORFOLK POLICE DEPARTMENT; CITY OF CHESAPEAKE POLICE DEPARTMENT; WILLIAM T. HODSDEN; W.A. COPELAND; STUART GORDON; CITY OF NORFOLK; CLARENDON NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY,

Defendants - Appellees.

No. 08-1928

ERWIN B. PATTERSON, JR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

CITY OF CHESAPEAKE; STEPHEN E. MILLS; JOHN C. LUMPKIN P.C.; TEIDE ENTERPRISES, INCORPORATED; CITY OF CHESAPEAKE POLICE DEPARTMENT; STUART GORDON; CLARENDON NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY,

Defendants – Appellees,

andCOMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA; TOWNE BANK; CITY OF NORFOLK POLICE DEPARTMENT; WILLIAM T. HODSDEN; W.A. COPELAND; CITY OF NORFOLK,

Defendants.

No. 08-2268

ERWIN B. PATTERSON, JR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

JOHN C. LUMPKIN P.C.,

Defendant – Appellee,

and

CITY OF CHESAPEAKE; COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA; STEPHEN E. MILLS; TEIDE ENTERPRISES, INCORPORATED; TOWNE BANK; CITY OF NORFOLK POLICE DEPARTMENT; CITY OF CHESAPEAKE POLICE DEPARTMENT; WILLIAM T. HODSDEN; W.A. COPELAND; STUART GORDON; CITY OF NORFOLK; CLARENDON NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY,

Defendants.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (2:07-cv-00611-RAJ-FBS)

Submitted: February 19, 2009 Decided: February 23, 2009

Before WILKINSON, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

2Erwin B. Patterson, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Catherine Hanson Lindley, Grady A. Palmer, CHESAPEAKE CITY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, Chesapeake, Virginia, Stephen Michael Hall, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, Marshall Allen Winslow, Jr., WOLCOTT, RIVERS & GATES, Virginia Beach, Virginia, Sara Ashley John, M. RICHARD EPPS, PC, Virginia Beach, Virginia, Robert Henry Burger, WILLIAMS MULLEN, Virginia Beach, Virginia, Andrew Richard Fox, Assistant City Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, Joseph Franklin Verser, JONES, BLECHMAN, WOLTZ & KELLY, PC, Newport News, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

34 PER CURIAM:

In these consolidated cases, Erwin B. Patterson, Jr.,

seeks to appeal the district court’s orders cumulatively

dismissing all defendants from this civil action. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.

Patterson v. City of Chesapeake , No. 2:07-cv-00611-RAJ-FBS (E.D.

Va. June 20, 2008; Aug. 8, 2008; filed Sept. 30 & entered

Oct. 2, 2008). We further grant Patterson’s motion to proceed

on appeal in forma pauperis, but deny his motion to admit new

evidence. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED