alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Fourth Court of Appeals
San Antonio, Texas

November 17, 2 017

No. 04

- 17

- 00358

- CR

Cristian YEPEZ

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas, Appellee

From the 406th Judicial District Court, Webb County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014CRN001641

- D4 Honorable Oscar J. Hale, Jr., Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

The reporter’s record in this appeal was originally due July 31, 2017. Since this time , the various court reporters r esponsible for preparing their respective parts of the reporter’s record have received numerous extensions. Some of them have filed their respective reporter’s records. However, c ourt reporter s David J. Laurel and Blanca Espericueta have failed to file the ir respective reporter’s records. Blanca Espericueta claim s that s he is “waiting” for David J. Laurel. David J. Laurel ha s a pending notification of late records. We NOTE his notification

.
We ORDER David J. Laurel to file the reporter’s record in Appeal N o. 04

- 17

- 00358

- CR within twenty days of being served a copy of this order. NO EXTENSIONS WILL BE GRANTED. If David J. Laurel fails to file the reporter’s record in Appeal No. 04

- 17

- 00358

- CR as ordered, David J. Laurel will be ordered to appear and show cau se why he should not be held in civil or criminal co ntempt or otherwise sanctioned.

We further ORDER the Clerk of this Court to have David J. Laurel personally served with a copy of this order. We also ORDER the person who personally serves David J. Laurel to file with this Court written proof of the date and time that David J. Laurel was served with a copy of this order.

We ORDER Blanca Espericueta to file the reporter’s record in Appeal No. 04

- 17

- 00358

- CR within twenty days of being served a copy o f this order. NO EXTENSIONS WILL BE GRANTED. If Blanca Espericueta fails to file the reporter’s record in Appeal No.04

- 17

- 00358

- CR as ordered, Blanca Espericueta will be ordered to appear and show cause why

she should not be held in civil or criminal co nt empt or otherwise sanctioned.

We further ORDER the Clerk of this Court to have Blanca Espericueta personally served with a copy of this order. We also ORDER the person who personally serves Blanca Espericueta to file with this Court written proof of the d ate and time that Blanca Espericueta was served with a copy of this order.

We further ORDER the Clerk of this C ourt to send a copy of this order to the Honorable Oscar J. Hale, Jr. , by first class United States mail. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 35.3(c) (“The trial and appellate courts are jointly responsible for ensuring that the appellate record is timely filed. ”).

_________________________________ Karen Angelini, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 17th day of November, 2017

.

___________________________________ K eith E. H ottle Clerk of Court
`[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 233 Reported in House (RH)]






                                                  House Calendar No. 79
106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 233

                          [Report No. 106-211]

Providing for the consideration of the bill (H.R. 1218) to amend title 
18, United States Code, to prohibit taking minors across State lines in 
circumvention of laws requiring the involvement of parents in abortion 
                               decisions.


_______________________________________________________________________


                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 29, 1999

   Mrs. Myrick, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION


 
Providing for the consideration of the bill (H.R. 1218) to amend title 
18, United States Code, to prohibit taking minors across State lines in 
circumvention of laws requiring the involvement of parents in abortion 
                               decisions.

    Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it shall be in 
order without intervention of any point of order to consider in the 
House the bill (H.R. 1218) to amend title 18, United States Code, to 
prohibit taking minors across State lines in circumvention of laws 
requiring the involvement of parents in abortion decisions. The bill 
shall be considered as read for amendment. The previous question shall 
be considered as ordered on the bill to final passage without 
intervening motion except: (1) two hours of debate equally divided and 
controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee 
on the Judiciary; and (2) one motion to recommit.
                                     





                                                  House Calendar No. 79

106th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                              H. RES. 233

                          [Report No. 106-211]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

Providing for the consideration of the bill (H.R. 1218) to amend title 
18, United States Code, to prohibit taking minors across State lines in 
circumvention of laws requiring the involvement of parents in abortion 
                               decisions.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             June 29, 1999

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed`
EXHIBIT 35.1  ANNUAL SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT PURSUANT TO ITEM 1123 OF REGULATION AB

CARMAX BUSINESS SERVICES, LLC

The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of CarMax Business Services, LLC, as Servicer pursuant to Section 3.10 of the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of February 1, 2012 (the Sale and
Servicing Agreement) among CarMax Auto Owner Trust 2012-1, as Issuer (the Issuer), CarMax Auto Funding LLC, as Depositor, CarMax Business Services, LLC, as Servicer (the Servicer), and Wells Fargo Bank, National
Association, as Backup Servicer, does hereby certify that:



| | 1. | CarMax Business Services, LLC is, as of the date hereof, the Servicer under the Sale and Servicing Agreement.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The undersigned is duly authorized to execute and deliver this Officers Certificate.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 3. | A review of the activities of the Servicer during the period beginning on March 1, 2012 and ending on February 28, 2013 and of the Servicers performance
under the Sale and Servicing Agreement was made under my supervision. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Sale and Servicing Agreement in all material respects throughout
such period.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Capitalized terms used in
this certificate and not otherwise defined herein have the meanings assigned to them in the Sale and Servicing Agreement.

IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of the Servicer, has duly executed this Officers Certificate this 24th day of May, 2013.



CARMAX BUSINESS SERVICES, LLC/s/ Thomas W. ReedyThomas W. Reedy
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
and Treasurer
# C_2006212EN.01004603.xml

| 2.9.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 212/46 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.9.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 212/46

---

Order of the Court of First Instance of 5 July 2006 — Deutsche Telekom v OHIM (Alles, was uns verbindet)

(Case T-18/06) (1)

1

(2006/C 212/80)

Language of the case: German

Language of the case: German

The President of the Fourth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 86, 8.4.2006.

1

---
Motion Dismissed and Memorandum Dissent on Order filed September 7, 2023

.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 22

- 00511

- CR

TROY EDWARD HOLT , Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On Appeal from the Yoakum County, Texas Trial Court Cause N o. CR 11922

M EM ORNADUM D ISSENT ON ORDER

It is well established that a defendant is not entitled to hybrid representation,
and I agree with the majority that we need not consider the merits of appellant ’s pro se motion for rehearing. See Ex parte Bohannan , 350 S.W.3d 1 1 6, 116 n.1 (Tex. Crim. App. 2011) (whe n habeas applicant was represented by counsel, court must disregard and take no action on pro se filings); Robinson v. State , 240 S.W.3d 919, 922 (Tex. Crim. App. 2007) ( “ [T] rial court is free to disrega rd any pro se2 mo tions presented by a defendant who is represented by counsel

. ”).

A ppellant is still represented by appointed counsel , and it is not clear from the record whether appellant ’ s counsel received a cop y of this motion. I would notify appellant ’s a pp ointed cou nse l and give counsel ten days to respond before we dismiss appellant ’ s motion.

Because th e majority dismisses appellant ’ s motion for rehearing without notifying his appointed counse l , I respectfully dissent

.

/ s/ C ha rles A. Spain J usti ce

Panel c onsists o f Chief

J ustice C hristopher

a n d Justices Jewell and Spain (Spain, J., d issentin g)

. Do Not Publish — Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
EXHIBIT 32.1

                 CERTIFICATE OF THE PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, the
undersigned Principal Executive Officer of The RiceX Company. (the "Company"),
hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form
10-QSB of the Company for the quarter ended March 31, 2004 (the "Report") fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.



         /s/ DANIEL L. MCPEAK, SR.
--------------------------------------------
         Daniel L. McPeak Sr.
         Chairman of the Board
         (Principal Executive Officer)

May 17, 2004
































                                 Exhibit 32.1-1
§ 170.114 What restrictions apply to the use of a Tribal transportation facility? ( a ) All Tribal transportation facilities listed in the approved NTTFI must be open and available for public use as required by 23 U.S.C. 101(a)(31). However, the public authority having jurisdiction over these roads or the Secretary, in consultation with a Tribe and applicable private landowners, may restrict road use or close roads temporarily when: ( 1 ) Required for public health and safety or as provided in § 170.116.
( 2 ) Conducting engineering and traffic analysis to determine maximum speed limits, maximum vehicular size, and weight limits, and identify needed traffic control devices; and
( 3 ) Erecting, maintaining, and enforcing compliance with signs and pavement markings.
( b ) Consultation is not required whenever the conditions in paragraph (a) of this section involve immediate safety or life-threatening situations.
( c ) A Tribal transportation facility owned by a Tribe or BIA may be permanently closed only when the Tribal government and the Secretary agree. Once this agreement is reached, BIA must remove the facility from the NTTFI and it will be ineligible for expenditure of any TTP funds.
#### § 170.414 How is the Tribal long-range transportation plan used and updated?

The Tribal government uses its TTP long-range transportation plan to develop transportation projects as documented in a Tribal priority list or TTIP and to identify and justify the Tribe's updates to the NTTFI. To be consistent with State, Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) and Regional Planning Organization (RPO) planning practices, the TTP long-range transportation plan must be reviewed annually and updated at least every five years.
#### § 13.15 Administrative appeals.

The decision of the Assistant Secretary—Indian Affairs may be appealed under procedures established in 43 CFR 4.350-4.369.[1]

###### Footnotes -
  13.15

[1] Sections 4.350-4.369 of 43 CFR part 4, were removed at 46 FR 7335, Jan. 23, 1981.
# C_2006190EN.01002502.xml

| 12.8.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 190/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.8.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 190/25

---

Action brought on 19 June 2006 — Estancia Piedra v OHIM — Franciscan Vineyards (ESTANCIA PIEDRA)

(Case T-159/06)

(2006/C 190/46)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Applicant: Estancia Piedra SL (Toro, Spain) (represented by: B. Cordery, Solicitor)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Franciscan Vineyards Inc. (St. Helena, USA)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (OHIM) of 28 March 2006 (Case R 363/2005-2); |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (OHIM) of 28 March 2006 (Case R 363/2005-2);

| — | order OHIM to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order OHIM to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Registered Community trade mark subject of the application for a declaration of invalidity: The figurative mark ‘ESTANCIA PIEDRA’ for services in class 35 (information and consultancy services in relation to retailing via worldwide computer networks; import-export of wines) — Community trade mark No 2 127 868

Registered Community trade mark subject of the application for a declaration of invalidity:

Proprietor of the Community trade mark: The applicant

Proprietor of the Community trade mark:

Party requesting the declaration of invalidity of the Community trade mark: Franciscan Vineyards Inc.

Party requesting the declaration of invalidity of the Community trade mark:

Trade mark right of the party requesting the declaration of invalidity: The Community word mark ‘ESTANCIA’ for products in classes 29, 30 and 33 (meat, fish, coffee, tea, alcoholic beverages ...)

Trade mark right of the party requesting the declaration of invalidity:

Decision of the Cancellation Division: Declaration of invalidity of the Community trade mark

Decision of the Cancellation Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissal of the appeal

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Firstly, infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Council Regulation No 40/94 as it was concluded that there was a likelihood of confusion between the earlier mark and ‘ESTANCIA PIEDRA’. Secondly, infringement of the procedural requirements since the Board of Appeal accepted, according to the applicant, an invalid and late filed authorisation from Franciscan Vineyards for their representatives and illegitimately purported to extend the time-limit for Franciscan Vineyards to file the authorisation.

Pleas in law:

---
Presidential Documents

1333 

Federal Register 

Vol. 76, No. 6 

Monday, January 10, 2011 

Title 3— 

The President 

Presidential Determination No. 2011–6 of November 29, 2010 

Suspension of Limitations Under the Jerusalem Embassy Act 

Memorandum for the Secretary of State 

Pursuant to the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution 

and the laws of the United States, including section 7(a) of the Jerusalem 

Embassy Act of 1995 (Public Law 104–45) (the ‘‘Act’’), I hereby determine 

that it is necessary, in order to protect the national security interests of 

the United States, to suspend for a period of 6 months the limitations 

set forth in sections 3(b) and 7(b) of the Act. 

You are hereby authorized and directed to transmit this determination to 

the Congress, accompanied by a report in accordance with section 7(a) 

of the Act, and to publish the determination in the Federal Register. 

This suspension shall take effect after transmission of this determination 

and report to the Congress. 

THE WHITE HOUSE, 

Washington, November 29, 2010 

[FR Doc. 2011–380 

Filed 1–7–11; 8:45 am] 

Billing code 4710–10–P 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with PRESDOCSOB#1.EPS</GPH>
| (logo)WELLS          FARGO | Corporate Trust ServicesMAC R1204-010 9062 Old Annapolis Road

Columbia, MD 21045

 

Tel:  410 884 2000

Fax: 410 715 2380 |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

 

 

 

 

Wells Fargo Commercial Mortgage Securities, Inc. 

c/o Wells Fargo Securities, LLC

375 Park Avenue 2nd floor

J0127-023

New York, New York 10152-023

 

 

 

 

RE: Annual Statement of Compliance for Wells Fargo Commercial Mortgage

Securities Inc. Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2012-C6

 

 

Per the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of April 1, 2012 (the "Agreement"), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Certificate Administrator ("Wells Fargo"), hereby certifies as follows as of and for the year ending December 31, 2014 (the "Reporting Period"):

 

(a) A review of Wells Fargo's activities during the Reporting Period and of its performance under the Agreement has been made under such officer's supervision; and

 

(b) To the best of such officer's knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.

 

 

 

 

February 26, 2015

 

/s/  Brian Smith

BRIAN SMITH 

Vice President

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. |   |
|------------------------|--------|
§ 225.35 Inspection of premises; books and accounts. ( a ) Operators shall allow Indian mineral owners, their authorized representatives, or any authorized representatives of the Secretary to enter all parts of the minerals agreement area for the purpose of inspection. Operators shall keep a full and correct account of all operations and submit all related reports required by the minerals agreement and applicable regulations. Books and records shall be available for inspection during regular business hours.
( b ) Operators shall provide records to the Minerals Management Service (MMS) in accordance with MMS regulations and guidelines. All records pertaining to a minerals agreement shall be maintained by an operator in accordance with 30 CFR part 212.
( c ) Operators shall provide records to the Authorized Officer in accordance with BLM regulations and guidelines.
( d ) Operators shall provide records to the Director's Representative in accordance with OSMRE regulations and guidelines.
# C_2014089EN.01006601.xml

| 28.3.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 89/66 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.3.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 89/66

---

Corrigendum to Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the TFEU — Cases where the Commission raises no objections

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 50 of 21 February 2014
  )

Official Journal of the European Union C 50 of 21 February 2014

2014/C 89/11

On page 2, the text referring to State aid No SA.29832 (2013/N-2 and MC10/2009, ex SA.27991 (C10/2009), ex SA.28855 (N373/2009), ex SA.33305 (2012/C)) is cancelled and replaced by the following:

‘Decisions in the context of the monitoring of the implementation of decisions regarding restructuring and liquidation aid for financial institutions

(Text with EEA relevance)

| Date of adoption of the decision | 5.11.2013 |
| --- | --- |
| Reference number of the aid | SA.29832 (2013/N-2 and MC10/2009, ex SA.27991 (C10/2009), ex SA.28855 (N373/2009), ex SA.33305 (2012/C)) |
| Member State | Netherlands |
| Title (and/or name of the beneficiary) | Amendment to the restructuring plan of ING |
| Type of Decision | New decision related to the following Commission decision: SA.28855;SA.33305;SA.27991; SA.29832 |
| Content | Adaptation of the burden-sharing arrangements, Adaptation of business strategy/path to restore viability, Other adaptation |
| Other information | |

Date of adoption of the decision

5.11.2013

Reference number of the aid

SA.29832 (2013/N-2 and MC10/2009, ex SA.27991 (C10/2009), ex SA.28855 (N373/2009), ex SA.33305 (2012/C))

Member State

Netherlands

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

Amendment to the restructuring plan of ING

Type of Decision

New decision related to the following Commission decision: SA.28855;SA.33305;SA.27991; SA.29832

Content

Adaptation of the burden-sharing arrangements, Adaptation of business strategy/path to restore viability, Other adaptation

Other information

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

http://ec.europa.eu/competition/elojade/isef/index.cfm’

---
REPORT ON ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION’S REGULATION AB SERVICING CRITERIA





For the calendar year ending December
31, 2016, National Tax Search, LLC has been a Tax Service Vendor for Wells Fargo Bank (the “Servicer”).



National Tax Search, LLC (“NTS”)
is responsible for assessing compliance as of December 31, 2016 and for the period from January 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016
(the “Reporting Period”) with the servicing criteria set forth in Title 17, Section 229.1122(d) of the Code of Federal
Regulations (the “CFR”). NTS has used the servicing criteria communicated to NTS by the Servicer to assess compliance
with the applicable servicing criteria. Only servicing criteria 1122(d)(l)(ii), 1122(d)1(iv), 1122(d)2(ii), 1122(d)2(v), 1122(d)2(vi),
1122(d)(4)(xi), and 1122(d)(4)(xii) (the “Applicable Servicing Criteria”) are applicable to the activities NTS performs
with respect to the transactions covered by this report. NTS has determined that the remaining servicing criteria set forth in
Item 1122 (d) of the SEC Regulation AB are not applicable to the activities it performs with respect to the transactions covered
by this report. The transactions covered by this report include all tax payments made on behalf of the Servicer using NTS’s
TaxQ system (the “Platform Transactions”).



NTS, as a vendor, has assessed its
compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria for the Reporting Period and has concluded that NTS has complied, in all material
respects, with the Applicable Servicing Criteria as of December 31, 2016 and for the Reporting Period with respect to the Platform
Transactions taken as a whole.



Plante & Moran, PLLC, an independent
registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report on the assessment of compliance with the Applicable Servicing
Criteria as of December 31, 2016 and for the Reporting Period as set forth in this assertion.



National Tax Search, LLC, as Vendor
to Servicer









Lori D. Eshoo, President/CEO
January 23, 2017