alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

An open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Tax Forms and Publications Project Committee will be conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comments, ideas and suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal Revenue Service.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held Tuesday, February 8, 2011.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Marisa Knispel at 1-888-912-1227 or 718-488-3557.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Notice is hereby given pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) that an open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Tax Forms and Publications Project Committee will be held Tuesday, February 8, 2011, at 2 p.m., Eastern Time via telephone conference. The public is invited to make oral comments or submit written statements for consideration. Due to limited conference lines, notification of intent to participate must be made with Marisa Knispel. For more information, please contact Ms. Knispel at 1-888-912-1227 or 718-488-3557, or write TAP Office, 10 MetroTech Center, 625 Fulton Street, Brooklyn, NY 11201, or post comments to the Web site:                     *http://www.improveirs.org.*

The agenda will include various IRS issues.

Dated: January 5, 2011.

Shawn Collins,

Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.

[FR Doc. 2011-402 Filed 1-11-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
#### True W. Twombly *v.*Ephraim S. Randall, Trustee, et al.

Equity. No. 6947.

Decided February 23, 1880.

When personal property is purchased by the husband and, at the same time, mortgaged by him to secure, payment of the purchase money, such mortgage may be executed by the husband alone, and does not require the signature of his wife to make it valid. The provisions of secs. 797 and 798 B-. S. I). C. do not apply to such a case.

STATEMENT 0E THE CASE.

This was a bill in equity setting forth that plaintiff had purchased certain goods and chattels and household effects, giving his note secured by a deed of trust upon the same, to secure the payment of the purchase money. That default being imple in the payment of the note, the trustee now threatened to proceed under said trust and to remove all of said personal property, &c., and sell them at public auction to satisfy said indebtedness. That at the time of the execution of said deed of trust, complainant was a married man, his wife, Alice B. Twombly living with him at the time, and. still continuing to live with him, both of them being then and there residents of the District of Columbia that said deed of trust was not executed in any manner by his said wife. That the property so .mortgaged being exempt from attachment, levy and seizure, the deed of trust is invalid by reason of the non-joinder of plaintiff’s wife in the execution thereof as required by the act of Congress of February 5, 1867, (R. S. D, C., secs. 797 and 798).‘

That statute, after providing (sec. 797) for the exemption of certain property from distraint, attachment, levy and sale, on execution or decree, declares (section 798) : “No deed of trust, bill of sale, or mortgage upon any exempted articles, shall be binding or valid unless signed by the wife of the debtor, if he be married and living with his wife.”

The bill concludes with a prayer that the defendants, their agents and attorneys, be enjoined from taking possession of selling or offering to sell said goods and household furniture *49or in any way interfering with plaintiff’s possession thereof.

On final hearing in the court below the bill was dismissed, and complainant appealed to the General Term.

Thomas F. Miller for complainant.

W. H. Browne for defendants.

By the Court:

When property is purchased by the husband, and at the same time mortgaged by him to secure payment of the purchase money, such mortgage may be executed by the *husband alone,*and does not require the signature of his wife to make it valid. And sections 797 and 798 of the R. S. D. C., act of Congress of February 5, 1867, do not exempt property so purchased from the operation of the lien created by such mortgage to secure the purchase money, notwithstanding that such property may not exceed in value the amount exempted under said act from execution, &c.

The deed of trust from Twombly to Randall, trustee, is valid ; and the decree below is affirmed.
#### § 226.35 Formations to be protected.

Lessee shall, to the satisfaction of the Superintendent, take all proper precautions and measures to prevent damage or pollution of oil, gas, fresh water, or other mineral bearing formations.
### §8664. Suspension of construction in case of treaty

In case of a treaty for the limitation of naval armament to which the United States is a signatory, the President may suspend so much of the authorized naval construction as is necessary to bring the naval vessels of the United States within the limitations agreed upon. Such a suspension does not apply to vessels under construction at the time the suspension is made.

(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 449, §7294; renumbered §8664, Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, §807(d)(2), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1836.)

| Revised section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 7294 | 34 U.S.C. 498h (as applicable to vessels). | May 17, 1938, ch. 243, §9 (as applicable to vessels), 52 Stat. 403. |

The words "the United States would welcome and support an international conference for naval limitations" are omitted as a declaration of purpose without permanent or general significance. The word "further" is omitted since there is no such agreement in existence today. The word "international" is omitted as unnecessary since the word "treaty" necessarily involves an international understanding. The word "may" is substituted for the words "is hereby authorized and empowered to" for brevity.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–232 renumbered section 7294 of this title as this section.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2018 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 115–232 effective Feb. 1, 2019, with provision for the coordination of amendments and special rule for certain redesignations, see section 800 of Pub. L. 115–232, set out as a note preceding section 3001 of this title.
§ 162.364 May BIA investigate compliance with a residential lease? ( a ) We may enter the leased premises at any reasonable time, upon reasonable notice, and consistent with any notice requirements under applicable tribal law and applicable lease documents, to protect the interests of the Indian landowners and ensure that the lessee is in compliance with the requirements of the lease.
( b ) If an Indian landowner notifies us that a specific lease violation has occurred, we will promptly initiate an appropriate investigation.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-60388 

CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYDS LONDON, subscribing to policy

UP01US361029,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

MAGNOLIA MANAGEMENT CORPORATION; BRANDON LIVING

CENTER, LLC, doing business as Brandon Court; RANKING COMMUNITY

CARE CENTER, LLC, doing business as Brandon Court; BRANDON

COURT, LLC; SANDRA CHAMPION BALL; MELISSA JOHNSTON; TRACY

ROBINSON GARCIE; COLLEEN CAMP,

Defendants - Appellants.

Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the Southern District of Mississippi, Jackson

3:04-CV-540

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

We have carefully reviewed the record, considered the briefs of the parties

and argument of counsel. Essentially for the reasons stated by the district court

in its careful Memorandum Opinions and Orders of June 2, 2005 and August 23,

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

July 25, 2008

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 07-60388 

2

2006, we agree with the district court’s conclusion that appellants’ policy

provided no coverage to appellants. We, therefore, affirm the district court’s

declaratory judgment.

Because we are unable to determine from the record whether appellee has

discharged any duty it may have to pay appellants’ cost of defense incurred prior

to the district court’s no coverage ruling, we remand this case to the district

court to resolve this issue and render judgment accordingly.

AFFIRMED.

REMANDED.
#### § 2.508 May the AS-IA take jurisdiction over an appeal to the IBIA?

Yes. The AS-IA has 40 days from the date on which the IBIA received your Notice of Appeal to take jurisdiction from the IBIA. The AS-IA will notify the IBIA in writing of the assumption of jurisdiction and request the administrative record of the appeal. At any time in the 40 days, the AS-IA may notify the IBIA that she or he is not going to take jurisdiction over an appeal, at which point the IBIA will assign a docket number to the appeal under its regulations in 43 CFR part 4. If the IBIA does not receive written notice from the AS-IA within the 40-day period of the AS-IA's intent to take jurisdiction over the appeal, the IBIA will assign a docket number to your appeal.
Editorial Note on Part 224
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 224 appear at 84 FR 69611, Dec. 18, 2019.

§ 224.185 When are decisions under this part effective? Decisions under subpart I are effective as follows: ( a ) Decisions of the Secretary disapproving a final proposed TERA or a revised final proposed TERA under subpart C of this part, a finding of imminent jeopardy to a physical trust asset under subpart F of this part, and decisions by the Secretary or the Assistant Secretary—Indian Affairs to reassume activities under subpart G of this part are final for the Department. These decisions and findings are effective upon issuance.
( b ) Decisions under this part, other than those in paragraph (a) of this section, that adversely affect a Tribe and for which an appeal is pending are not final for the Department and are not effective while the appeal is pending, unless: ( 1 ) The Tribe had an opportunity for a hearing before the decision was issued;
( 2 ) The Tribe had a reasonable amount of time to comply with the TERA after the decision was issued; and
( 3 ) The Interior Board of Indian Appeals (Board), the Secretary, or Assistant Secretary—Indian Affairs issued a written decision that, notwithstanding a reasonable period given the Tribe to comply with the TERA, the Tribe has failed to take the actions necessary to comply with the TERA.
( c ) All other decisions rendered by the Board or the Assistant Secretary—Indian Affairs in an appeal from a Secretary's decision under subparts E, F, or G of this part are effective when issued.
#### Grant W. Goodwine, by his Conservator, v. John J. Acton.

1. *Infancy*— Burden *of Proof on the Party Pleading it.*— Where a party files a plea of infancy, he assumes the burden of proving his plea by a preponderance of the evidence.

Assumpsit. — Appeal from the Circuit Court of Vermilion County; the Hon. Ferdinand Bookwalter, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the May term, 1901.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed September 11, 1901.

D. D. Evans and G. M. McDowell, attorneys for appellant.

*12Keeslar *&*Acton, attorneys for appellee.

Mr. Justice Wright

delivered .the opinion of the court.

This suit originated by the confession of a judgment upon a note and warrant of attorney against appellant for $2,600, and $200 attorney fee. Afterward upon appellant’s motion he was permitted by the court to defend against the note, and he then filed pleas of infancy, fraud, and part failure of consideration. A trial by jury ended in a verdict for $2,398.60, and upon overruling a motion for a new trial, the court credited the original judgment down to the amount of the verdict, and to reverse this, the appeal is brought here.

There are no valid objections to the instructions and no prejudicial rulings upon the evidence. Appellant assumed the affirmative at the trial to prove his special pleas by a preponderance of the evidence. The consideration of the note was three other notes, given by appellant to appellee, in the aggregate $2,600. If appellant’s testimony was believed, he owed but a little over- $800. Appellee remembered items going to make up the old notes of over $1,600; he did not remember the amount of interest that was figured into them, but knows that interest did enter into them. Upon the whole evidence we are not disposed to disturb the verdict. The three notes combined were alone *prwna facie*a sufficient consideration for°the new note, and the burden was upon the appellant to show by a preponderance of the evidence he did not owe them. The witnesses were before the jury, where their credibility could be tested in ways that are not open to us, and we are unwilling, in view of the whole evidence, to say that the jury were not warranted in their finding. There was no evidence to sustain the pleas of infancy or fraud and the judgment will be affirmed.
Editorial Note on Part 23
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 23 appear at 79 FR 27190, May 13, 2014.

§ 23.140 What information must States furnish to the Bureau of Indian Affairs? ( a ) Any State court entering a final adoption decree or order in any voluntary or involuntary Indian-child adoptive placement must furnish a copy of the decree or order within 30 days to the Bureau of Indian Affairs, Chief, Division of Human Services, 1849 C Street NW, Mail Stop 3645 MIB, Washington, DC 20240, along with the following information, in an envelope marked “Confidential”: ( 1 ) Birth name and birthdate of the Indian child, and Tribal affiliation and name of the Indian child after adoption;
( 2 ) Names and addresses of the biological parents;
( 3 ) Names and addresses of the adoptive parents;
( 4 ) Name and contact information for any agency having files or information relating to the adoption;
( 5 ) Any affidavit signed by the biological parent or parents asking that their identity remain confidential; and
( 6 ) Any information relating to Tribal membership or eligibility for Tribal membership of the adopted child.
( b ) If a State agency has been designated as the repository for all State-court adoption information and is fulfilling the duties described in paragraph (a) of this section, the State courts in that State need not fulfill those same duties.
[59 FR 2256, Jan. 13, 1994, as amended at 83 FR 55268, Nov. 5, 2018]
Comment Info: ================= General Comment:AD Docket Supporting Information
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v John Aponte, Appellant.

[823 NYS2d 406]

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Robert G. Seewald, J.), rendered February 7, 2000, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of murder in the second degree, and sentencing him to a term of 15 years to life, unanimously affirmed.

The court properly found defendant competent to stand trial following a hearing. The court properly weighed the conflicting psychiatric reports and testimony, as well as its own observations of defendant, in concluding that the Feople had proven defendant’s competence by a preponderance of the evidence *(see People v Mendez, 1*NY3d 15, 20 [2003]). Theré was clear evidence from two psychiatrists that defendant was able to understand the facts of the case, the charges against him and the roles of the various participants in the court proceedings *(see People v Shiffer,*256 AD2d 818, 819 [1998], *lv denied*93 NY2d 878 [1999]), and defendant’s own psychologist partially *299supported these conclusions. There was also strong evidence of defendant’s exaggeration or feigning of symptoms, such as his ability to interact appropriately with other patients when the doctors were not around and the nursing staff was reduced, the fact that he never discussed his symptoms except in the context of his criminal case, and indications that he was fabricating hallucinations. Concur—Tom, J.P., Andrias, Saxe, Marlow and Nardelli, JJ.
§ 162.438 What documents are required for BIA approval of a business lease? A lessee or the Indian landowners must submit the following documents to us to obtain BIA approval of a business lease: ( a ) A lease executed by the Indian landowners and the lessee that meets the requirements of this part;
( b ) For tribal land, a tribal authorization for the lease and, if applicable, meeting the requirements of §§ 162.420(a), 162.426(b), and 162.428(a), or a separate signed certification meeting the requirements of §§ 162.426(b) and 162.428(a));
( c ) A valuation, if required under § 162.420 or § 162.421;
( d ) Proof of insurance, if required under § 162.437;
( e ) A performance bond or other security, if required under § 162.434;
( f ) Statement from the appropriate tribal authority that the proposed use is in conformance with applicable tribal law, if required by the tribe;
( g ) Environmental and archeological reports, surveys, and site assessments as needed to facilitate compliance with applicable Federal and tribal environmental and land use requirements, including any documentation prepared under § 162.027(b);
( h ) A restoration and reclamation plan (and any subsequent modifications to the plan), if appropriate;
( i ) Where the lessee is not an entity owned and operated by the tribe, documents that demonstrate the technical capability of the lessee or lessee's agent to construct, operate, maintain, and terminate the proposed project and the lessee's ability to successfully design, construct, or obtain the funding for a project similar to the proposed project, if appropriate;
( j ) A preliminary plan of development that describes the type and location of any permanent improvements the lessee plans to construct and a schedule showing the tentative commencement and completion dates for those improvements, if appropriate;
( k ) A legal description of the land under § 162.418;
( l ) If the lease is being approved under 25 U.S.C. 415, information to assist us in our evaluation of the factors in 25 U.S.C. 415(a); and
( m ) If the lessee is a corporation, limited liability company, partnership, joint venture, or other legal entity, except a tribal entity, information such as organizational documents, certificates, filing records, and resolutions, that demonstrates that: ( 1 ) The representative has authority to execute a lease;
( 2 ) The lease will be enforceable against the lessee; and
( 3 ) The legal entity is in good standing and authorized to conduct business in the jurisdiction where the land is located.
EXHIBIT 31.1 -- Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to
                Section 302 of the Sorbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

                           CERTIFICATION

I, Robert Kamon, Secretary, and Chief Financial Officer certify that:

1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Australian-
Canadian Oil Royalties Ltd.;

2.  Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this quarterly report;

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4.  The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and Also, see the description of subsequent events
at Note 8. 15d-14) for the registrant and I have:

   (a)  designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
   material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
   subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
   particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being
   prepared;

   (b)  evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
   and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
   quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

   (c)  presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
   effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
   evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5.  The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing
equivalent function):

   (a)  all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
   controls that could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
   process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
   registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

   (b)  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
   employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
   controls; and

6.  The registrant's other certifying officer and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal
controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date:  November 3, 2004

/s/ Robert Kamon
--------------------------------------
Robert Kamon
Secretary and Chief Financial Officer
###### Editorial Note on Part 23

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 23 appear at 79 FR 27190, May 13, 2014.

#### § 23.61 Appeals from decision or action by Agency Superintendent, Regional Director or Grants Officer.

A grantee or prospective applicant may appeal any decision made or action taken by the Agency Superintendent, Regional Director, or grants officer under subpart C or E of this part. Such an appeal shall be made to the Assistant Secretary who shall consider the appeal in accordance with 25 CFR 2.20 (c) through (e). Appeal procedures shall be as set out in part 2 of this chapter.