alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
BEFORE THE 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

Joint Application of 

DELTA AIR LINES, INC., 

 

AEROVIAS de MEXICO, S.A. de C.V. 

AEROLITORAL, S.A. de C.V. 

for statements of authorization under 

14 C.F.R. Part 212 (blanket behind-gateway 

U.S.-Mexico codesharing) 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Dockets OST-1997-3289 

 OST-2001-10833 

30-DAY NOTICE REGARDING 

ADDITIONAL CODESHARING POINTS

Communications with respect to this document should be addressed to: 

John R. Mietus, Jr. 

LAW OFFICE OF JOHN MIETUS, LLC 

6701 Democracy Boulevard Ste 300 

Bethesda, Maryland 20817 

(202) 747-5212 

john@mietuslaw.com 

Counsel for AEROVIAS de MEXICO, S.A. 

de C.V. and 

AEROLITORAL, S.A. de C.V. 

Alexander Van der Bellen 

Managing Director – Government Affairs 

 & Associate General Counsel 

DELTA AIR LINES, INC. 

1212 New York Avenue, N.W. 

Washington, D.C. 20005 

(202) 842-4184 

sascha.vanderbellen@delta.com

August 9, 2012 

 
BEFORE THE 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

Joint Application of 

DELTA AIR LINES, INC., 

 

AEROVIAS de MEXICO, S.A. de C.V. 

AEROLITORAL, S.A. de C.V. 

for statements of authorization under 

14 C.F.R. Part 212 (blanket behind-gateway 

U.S.-Mexico codesharing) 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Dockets OST-1997-3289 

 OST-2001-10833 

30-DAY NOTICE REGARDING 

ADDITIONAL CODESHARING POINTS

 Pursuant to the blanket statements of authorization granted to Delta Air Lines, Inc. 

(“Delta”), Aerovias de Mexico, S.A. de C.V. (“Aeromexico”), and Aerolitoral, S.A. de C.V. d/b/a 

Aeromexico Connect (“Aerolitoral”) for behind gateway intra-Mexico codesharing in Dockets OST1997-3289 and OST-2001-10833, the carriers hereby notify the Department of their intent to 

display Delta’s “DL*” designator code on flights operated by Aeromexico and/or Aerolitoral 

between Delta’s authorized gateways in Mexico and the following new points: 

 Saltillo, México (SLW) 

Ciudad del Carmen, México (CME)
#### § 162.327 Will BIA notify a lessee when a payment is due under a residential lease?

Upon request of the Indian landowners, we may issue invoices to a lessee in advance of the dates on which payments are due under a residential lease. The lessee's obligation to make these payments in a timely manner will not be excused if invoices are not issued, delivered, or received.
### SUBCHAPTER V—ADDITIONAL PROVISIONS RELATING TO PROMOTION, SEPARATION, AND RETIREMENT

Sec.
641.
Applicability of chapter.
642.
Entitlement of officers discharged or retired under this chapter to separation pay or retired pay.
643.
Chaplains: discharge or retirement upon loss of professional qualifications.
[644.
Repealed.]
645.
Definitions.
646.
Consideration of performance as a member of the Joint Staff.
647.
Force shaping authority.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**2004**—Pub. L. 108–375, div. A, title V, §501(c)(1)(B), Oct. 28, 2004, 118 Stat. 1874, added item 647.

**1994**—Pub. L. 103–337, div. A, title XVI, §1671(b)(5), Oct. 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 3013, struck out item 644 "Authority to suspend officer personnel laws".

**1984**—Pub. L. 98–525, title XIII, §1301(d)(2), Oct. 19, 1984, 98 Stat. 2612, added item 646.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 316 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 316

  Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that a postage 
stamp should be issued honoring William Holmes McGuffey, author of the 
                           McGuffey Readers.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 29, 1999

Mr. Traficant submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                   the Committee on Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that a postage 
stamp should be issued honoring William Holmes McGuffey, author of the 
                           McGuffey Readers.

Whereas William Holmes McGuffey, born in Youngstown, Ohio, was the author of the 
        most influential schoolbooks in our Nation's history, the McGuffey 
        Readers;
Whereas using McGuffey's First Eclectic Reader, a child learned the alphabet, 
        simple rhymes and stories, spelling, practical knowledge, and moral 
        lessons;
Whereas among the lessons the McGuffey Eclectic Readers taught were citizenship, 
        character, conservation, and literacy;
Whereas the influence of the McGuffey Eclectic Readers in forming the minds of 
        19th century Americans is well-recognized;
Whereas since the McGuffey Reader was first published in 1836, more than 122 
        million copies are estimated to have been sold; and
Whereas the year 2000 will mark the 200th anniversary of the birth of William 
        Holmes McGuffey: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Representatives 
that--
            (1) the United States Postal Service should issue a postage 
        stamp honoring William Holmes McGuffey, author of the McGuffey 
        Readers; and
            (2) the Citizens' Stamp Advisory Committee should recommend 
        to the Postmaster General that such a stamp be issued.
                                 <all>
```
§ 216.3 Definitions. As used in the regulations in the part: ( a ) *Superintendent* means the superintendent or other officer of the Bureau of Indian Affairs having jurisdiction under delegated authority, over the lands involved.
( b ) *Mining supervisor* means the Regional Mining Supervisor, or his authorized representative, of the Geological Survey authorized as provided in 30 CFR 211.3 and 231.2 to supervise operations on the land covered by a permit or lease.
( c ) *Overburden* means all the earth and other materials which lie above a natural deposit of minerals and such earth and other materials after removal from their natural state in the process of mining.
( d ) Area of land to be affected or area of land affected means the area of land from which overburden is to be or has been removed and upon which the overburden or waste is to be or has been deposited, and includes all lands affected by the construction of new roads or the improvement or use of existing roads to gain access to an operation and for haulage.
( e ) *Operation* means all of the premises, facilities, roads, and equipment used in the process of determining the location, composition or quality of a mineral deposit, or in developing, extracting, or onsite processing of a mineral deposit in a designated area.
( f ) *Method of operation* means the method or manner by which a cut or open pit is made, the overburden is placed or handled, water is controlled or affected and other acts performed by the operator in the process of exploring or uncovering and removing or onsite processing of a mineral deposit.
( g ) Holder or operator means the permittee or lessee designated in a permit or lease.
( h ) *Reclamation* means measures undertaken to bring about the necessary reconditioning or restoration of land or water that has been affected by exploration or mineral development, mining or onsite processing operations, and waste disposal, in ways which will prevent or control onsite and offsite damage to the environment.
EXHIBIT 32.2 – 906 Certification








GENMED HOLDING CORP.





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUNT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Genmed Holding Corp. (the "Company") for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Randy Hibma, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss. 1350, as addopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.         The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.         The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered by the Report.








By: /s/ Randy Hibma


Randy Hibma


Chief Financial Officer


(Principal Financial Officer)


May 23, 2011





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 ("Section 906"), or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Genmed Holding Corp., and will be retained by Genmed Holding Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32 CERTIFICATION
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
with Respect to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
for the Quarter Ended March 31, 2004 Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a)
and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of
the undersigned officers of UCBH Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the
Company), do hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:  1.
    
    The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended March 31, 2004 (the Form 10-Q) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended (the Exchange Act); and2.
    
    Information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company. Dated: May 7, 2004
    /s/ Thomas S. WuThomas S. WuChairman, President and
Chief Executive Officer Dated: May 7, 2004
    /s/ Jonathan H. DowningJonathan H. DowningExecutive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer The certification set forth above is being furnished as an exhibit solely
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not being
filed as part of the Form 10-Q or as a separate disclosure document of the
Company or the certifying officers.
#### § 291.13 When do Class III gaming procedures for an Indian tribe become effective?

Upon approval of Class III gaming procedures for the Indian tribe under either § 291.8(b), § 291.8(c), or § 291.11(a), the Indian tribe shall have 90 days in which to approve and execute the Secretarial procedures and forward its approval and execution to the Secretary, who shall publish notice of their approval in the Federal Register. The procedures take effect upon their publication in the Federal Register.
|    |                                                                                                                                        |
|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Diamondback Energy, Inc. (the “registrant”); and |

|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report. |

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |  |  |
|   |   |   |   |
| Date:  | March 12, 2019 |   | /s/ Kaes Van't Hof |
|   |   |   | Kaes Van't Hof |
|   |   |   | Chief Financial Officer |
### §2482. Commissary stores: criteria for establishment or closure; store size

(a) Primary Consideration for Establishment.—The needs of members of the armed forces on active duty and the needs of dependents of such members shall be the primary consideration whenever the Secretary of Defense—

(1) assesses the need to establish a commissary store; and

(2) selects the actual location for the store.

(b) Store Size.—In determining the size of a commissary store, the Secretary of Defense shall take into consideration the number of all authorized patrons of the defense commissary system who are likely to use the store.

(c) Closure Considerations.—(1) Whenever assessing whether to close a commissary store, the effect of the closure on the quality of life of members and dependents referred to in subsection (a) who use the store and on the welfare and security of the military community in which the commissary is located shall be a primary consideration.

(2) Whenever assessing whether to close a commissary store, the Secretary of Defense shall also consider the effect of the closure on the quality of life of members of the reserve components of the armed forces.

(d) Congressional Notification.—(1) The closure of a commissary store in the United States shall not take effect until the end of the 90-day period beginning on the date on which the Secretary of Defense submits to Congress written notice of the reasons supporting the closure. The written notice shall include an assessment of the impact closure will have on the quality of life for military patrons and the welfare and security of the military community in which the commissary is located.

(2) Paragraph (1) shall not apply in the case of the closure of a commissary store as part of the closure of a military installation under a base closure law.

(Added Pub. L. 108–375, div. A, title VI, §651(a)(3), Oct. 28, 2004, 118 Stat. 1965; amended Pub. L. 112–81, div. A, title X, §1064(6), Dec. 31, 2011, 125 Stat. 1587.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 2482 was renumbered section 2485 of this title.

A prior section 2482a was renumbered section 2492 of this title.

#### Amendments

2011—Subsec. (d)(1). Pub. L. 112–81 inserted "in the United States" after "commissary store".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Prohibition on Consolidation or Other Organizational Changes of Department of Defense Retail Systems

Pub. L. 105–261, div. A, title III, §367, Oct. 17, 1998, 112 Stat. 1987, which provided that the operation and administration of the defense retail systems could not be consolidated or otherwise merged unless the consolidation or merger was specifically authorized by a law enacted after Oct. 17, 1998, was repealed by Pub. L. 108–375, div. A, title VI, §651(e)(3), Oct. 28, 2004, 118 Stat. 1972.
§ 1000.211 Will the bureau contact the Tribe/Consortium before initiating public consultation process for a non-BIA AFA under negotiation? Yes, the bureau and the Tribe/Consortium will discuss the consultation process to be used in negotiating a non-BIA AFA. ( a ) When public consultation is required by law, the bureau will follow the required process and will involve the Tribe/Consortium in that process to the maximum extent possible.
( b ) When public consultation is a matter of bureau discretion, at Tribal request the Tribe/Consortium and the bureau, unless prohibited by law, will jointly develop guidelines for that process, including the conduct of any future public meetings. The bureau and the Tribe/Consortium will jointly identify a list of potential project beneficiaries, third-party stakeholders, or third-party users (affected parties) for use in the public consultation process.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title: Characteristicsand financial circumstances of AFDC recipients**
 
1995 | 1996| 1997
 
SuDoc Number:HE 25.19:
Item Number:0524-A-17
CGP systemNumber:001038042
 
May 24, 2018
IV

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 403

Providing for the hour of meeting of the House.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 27, 2000

Mr. ARMEY submitted the following resolution; which was considered and

agreed to

RESOLUTION

Providing for the hour of meeting of the House.

1 Resolved, That unless otherwise ordered, before Mon2 day, May 15, 2000, the hour of daily meeting of the House

3 shall be 2 p.m. on Mondays; 11 a.m. on Tuesdays; and

4 10 a.m. on all other days of the week; and from Monday,

5 May 15, 2000, until the end of the second session, the

6 hour of daily meeting of the House shall be noon on Mon7 days; 10 a.m. on Tuesdays, Wednesdays, and Thursdays;

8 and 9 a.m. on all other days of the week.

Æ
#### § 115.812 Is a tribe responsible for its expenditures of trust funds that are not made in compliance with statutory language or other federal law?

If a tribe's use of trust funds is limited by statutory language or other federal law(s) and a tribe uses those trust funds in direct violation of those laws, absent an approved modification which allows for the expenditures, we will require the tribe to reimburse its trust fund account.
###### Editorial Note on Part 23

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 23 appear at 79 FR 27190, May 13, 2014.

#### § 23.123 [Reserved]
### §2694b. Participation in wetland mitigation banks

(a) Authority to Participate.—The Secretary of a military department, and the Secretary of Defense with respect to matters concerning a Defense Agency, when engaged in an authorized activity that may or will result in the destruction of, or an adverse impact to, a wetland, may make payments to a wetland mitigation banking program or "in-lieu-fee" mitigation sponsor approved in accordance with the Federal Guidance for the Establishment, Use and Operation of Mitigation Banks (60 Fed. Reg. 58605; November 28, 1995) or the Federal Guidance on the Use of In-Lieu-Fee Arrangements for Compensatory Mitigation Under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (65 Fed. Reg. 66913; November 7, 2000), or any successor administrative guidance or regulation.

(b) Alternative to Creation of Wetland.—Participation in a wetland mitigation banking program or consolidated user site under subsection (a) shall be in lieu of mitigating wetland impacts through the creation of a wetland on Federal property.

(c) Treatment of Payments.—Payments made under subsection (a) to a wetland mitigation banking program or consolidated user site may be treated as eligible project costs for military construction.

(Added Pub. L. 108–136, div. A, title III, §314(a)(1), Nov. 24, 2003, 117 Stat. 1430.)
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 35 (Tuesday, February 22, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 9808]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-3834]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY


U.S. Customs and Border Protection Accreditation and Approval of 
Saybolt LP, as a Commercial Gauger and Laboratory

AGENCY: U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Department of Homeland 
Security.

ACTION: Notice of accreditation and approval of Saybolt LP, as a 
commercial gauger and laboratory.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to 19 CFR 151.12 and 19 
CFR 151.13, Saybolt LP, 4871 Sunrise Dr., suite102, Martinez, CA 94553, 
has been approved to gauge and accredited to test petroleum and 
petroleum products for customs purposes in accordance with the 
provisions of 19 CFR 151.12 and 19 CFR 151.13. Anyone wishing to employ 
this entity to conduct laboratory analyses and gauger services should 
request and receive written assurances from the entity that it is 
accredited or approved by the U.S. Customs and Border Protection to 
conduct the specific test or gauger service requested. Alternatively, 
inquires regarding the specific test or gauger service this entity is 
accredited or approved to perform may be directed to the U.S. Customs 
and Border Protection by calling (202) 344-1060. The inquiry may also 
be sent to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#d6b5b4a6f8bab7b4bea796b2bea5f8b1b9a0"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="92f1f0e2bcfef3f0fae3d2f6fae1bcf5fde4">[email protected]</span></a>. Please reference the Web site listed 
below for a complete listing of CBP approved gaugers and accredited 
laboratories. http://cbp.gov/xp/cgov/import/operations_support/labs_scientific_svcs/commercial_gaugers/.

DATES: The accreditation and approval of Saybolt LP, as commercial 
gauger and laboratory became effective on July 08, 2010. The next 
triennial inspection date will be scheduled for July 2013.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Anthony Malana, Laboratories and 
Scientific Services, U.S. Customs and Border Protection, 1300 
Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Suite 1500N, Washington, DC 20229, 202-344-
1060.

    Dated: February 10, 2011.
Ira S. Reese,
Executive Director, Laboratories and Scientific Services.
[FR Doc. 2011-3834 Filed 2-18-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-14-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
# C_2006178EN.01002701.xml

| 29.7.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 178/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.7.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 178/27

---

Action brought on 2 June 2006 — Commission of the European Communities v Kingdom of Sweden

(Case C-249/06)

(2006/C 178/43)

Language of the case: Swedish

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: C. Tufvesson, B. Martenczuk and H. Stølvbæk, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Kingdom of Sweden

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | Declare that, by failing to take appropriate steps to eliminate the incompatibilities between Sweden's bilateral investment agreement with the Socialist Republic of Vietnam, together with 16 further bilateral investment agreements, and the EC Treaty, the Kingdom of Sweden has failed to fulfil its obligations under the second paragraph of Article 307 EC; |
| --- | --- |

—

Declare that, by failing to take appropriate steps to eliminate the incompatibilities between Sweden's bilateral investment agreement with the Socialist Republic of Vietnam, together with 16 further bilateral investment agreements, and the EC Treaty, the Kingdom of Sweden has failed to fulfil its obligations under the second paragraph of Article 307 EC;

| — | order the Kingdom of Sweden to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Kingdom of Sweden to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The agreements are incompatible with Community law since they do not permit the application of Community measures based in Articles 57(2) EC, 59 EC and 60 EC. Further, Sweden has not taken steps to rectify the situation. Thus Sweden has failed to fulfil its obligations under the second paragraph of Article 307 EC to take all appropriate steps to eliminate all incompatibilities between the Treaty and the investment agreements.

---