alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2006165EN.01001902.xml

| 15.7.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 165/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.7.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 165/19

---

Action brought on 12 May 2006 — Commission of the European Communities v Grand-Duchy of Luxembourg

(Case C-218/06)

(2006/C 165/34)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: D. Maidani, Agent)

Applicant:

Defendant: Grand-Duchy of Luxembourg

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | Declare that, by failing to bring into force the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2002/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2002 on the supplementary supervision of credit institutions, insurance undertakings and investment firms in a financial conglomerate and amending Council Directives 73/239/EEC, 79/267/EEC, 92/49/EEC, 92/96/EEC, 93/6/EEC and 93/22/EEC, and Directives 98/78/EC and 2000/12/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (1), or, in any event, by failing to notify the Commission of such measures, the Grand-Duchy of Luxembourg has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive; |
| --- | --- |

—

Declare that, by failing to bring into force the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2002/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2002 on the supplementary supervision of credit institutions, insurance undertakings and investment firms in a financial conglomerate and amending Council Directives 73/239/EEC, 79/267/EEC, 92/49/EEC, 92/96/EEC, 93/6/EEC and 93/22/EEC, and Directives 98/78/EC and 2000/12/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (1), or, in any event, by failing to notify the Commission of such measures, the Grand-Duchy of Luxembourg has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive;

1

| — | order the Grand-Duchy of Luxembourg to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Grand-Duchy of Luxembourg to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The period for implementing the directive expired on 11 August 2004.

---

(1)   OJ 2003 L 35, p.1.

1

---
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

# Koa Moana 15-3 Promotes Tri-Service, Partner Nations Maritime Security Cooperation Engagements

By Grady FontanaMilitary Sealift Command Far East

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More News/Articles
Exhibit 99.1

MID-WISCONSIN FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC., ADDS CHIEF FINANCIAL/OPERATIONS
OFFICER

December 2, 2009

Medford - Jim Warsaw, President and CEO announced that Mark A. King has
been appointed as the new Chief Financial/Operations Officer of Mid-
Wisconsin Financial Services, Inc. and its operating subsidiaries.

As Chief Financial/Operations Officer, King will be responsible for the
oversight of corporate accounting practices, financial reporting to
regulatory agencies, oversight of operational departments, and strategic
development with the board of directors and executive team.  "Mark's
experience in capital raising and managing operational departments will
enhance the Company's structure," according to Jim Warsaw, President and
CEO of Mid-Wisconsin Financial Services, Inc.

King has over 20 years of experience in the financial services industry,
most recently as the CFO and Senior Vice President of the Banks of
Wisconsin, Kenosha, WI, since 2000.  The Banks of Wisconsin is a deNovo
Bank that has grown to $250 million in 9 years.  He was responsible for
accounting, investments, human resources, information technology, deposit
operations and security.  Prior to that he served as the Controller or
Assistant Controller at community banks in Illinois ranging in size from
$85 million to $1 billion.

King earned his MBA and bachelor degree in Accounting from the University
of Wisconsin, Parkside and also holds a CPA designation.

Rhonda R. Kelley who has been serving as the Principal Accounting Officer
of Mid-Wisconsin Financial Services, Inc. on an interim basis since July 1,
2008, will assume the role as Controller of the Bank.

Mid-Wisconsin Bank, a subsidiary of Mid-Wisconsin Financial Services, Inc.,
is a $495 million independent community bank servicing communities
throughout central Wisconsin.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

# Ellsworth Successfully Validates Base's Long-range Strike Capability 

By Senior Airman Yash Rojas28th Bomb Wing Public Affairs

                ELLSWORTH AIR FORCE BASE, S.D  –              
This article was originally published at: http://www.pacaf.af.mil/news/story.asp?id=123411841

- PACOM: (posted May 22, 2014) - 

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

pacom

news

articles
STEAM ELECTRIC

CBI REPLACEMENT PAGE

EPA-HQ-OW-2009-0819

DCN: ________________________________________

THE FOLLOWING HAS BEEN REMOVED BECAUSE IT 

CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION 

(CBI) PER 40 CFR PART 2, SUBPART B.

SE04331A022
#### Walter Watson v. The State.

No. 22949.

Delivered November 8, 1944.

The opinion states the case.

*Joe*McCasland,'of Jefferson, for appellant.

*Ernest S. Goens,*State’s Attorney, of Austin, for the State.

*588DAVIDSON, Judge.

This case involves the same question, and is controlled by the decision this day delivered, in Cause No. 22,948, John Smith v. State of Texas. (Page 585 of this volume.)

For the reasons there assigned, the judgment of the trial court is reversed and the cause remanded.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of ,the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
SCWC-15-0000066

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAII

________________________________________________________________

STATE OF HAWAII, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee,

vs.

STANLEY S.L. KONG, Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant.

________________________________________________________________

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

(CAAP-15-0000066; CR. NO. 09-1-0683(2))

ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, and Wilson, JJ., with

Circuit Judge Chang in place of Pollack, J., recused)

Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant Stanley S.L. Kong’s 

application for writ of certiorari filed on February 9, 2017, is 

hereby accepted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that no oral argument will be heard 

in this case. Any party may, within ten days and pursuant to 

Rule 34(c) of the Hawaii Rules of Appellate Procedure, move for 

retention of oral argument.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawaii, March 24, 2017.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna 

/s/ Michael D. Wilson

/s/ Gary W.B. Chang

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCWC-15-0000066

24-MAR-2017

08:29 AM
### United States



# Environmental Protection Agency 

# EP A

Washington, DC 20460



# FEDERAL REGISTER TYPESET TING REQUEST

Requestor: Complete i t em s 1

, 2, 7

, 8

, 9, 10 , 1 1 , 12 , and 13. Retain copy nu mber 7 and submi t the balan ce w i th m anuscrip t copy to th e Hq. Federal Regi ste r O f

fice

. HQ Federal Register O ffi ce : Comple te Item s 3

, 4

, 5, and 6. Re tain copy number 5 and submi t balance to Hq

. P r in ting Ma nagemen t

.

1. T I TLE

2. SUB M I TTI NG A C TI VI TY 3. A SSI GNED FRL NU M B ER ( i ncl ude a l pha & num e r i c char act e r s for

ide n ti f i cati on)

4. OPEN REQU I S ITI O N NU M B ER 5. B I LLI NG CODE

6. FORW A RDED T O GS A

, N A RS - SIGN A T URE DA TE

7. NU M B ER OF MA N U S CRI PT P A G ES 8. ESTIM A TED NU M B ER OF COLU M N S 9. ESTIM A TED COST

10. SI GN A T URE: ( a ) REQUEST I N G OFFI CER 11. SI GN A T URE: ( a ) FEDER A L REGI STER DESI GNEE

(b) DA TE (c) TELEPHONE NU M B ER (b) DA TE (c) TELEPHONE NU M B ER

12. FUNDS A R E A V A I L A BLE

N A M E OF FUNDS CERTI F YI NG OFFICER SI GN A T URE OF FUNDS CERT I F YI NG OFFI CER PHONE NU M B ER OF FUNDS CERTI F YI NG OFFI CER



### 13. Fina ncial a n d A c c oun tin g D a ta

Li ne D C N

(Ma x 6 ) Budg et/FY s

(Ma x 4 ) Appr o p r i ati on C ode

(Ma x 6 ) Budg et Or g / C ode

(Ma x 7 ) P r o g ra m Re su lts Co de

(Ma x 9 ) Ob je ct Cla ss

(Ma x 4 ) SFO

(Ma x 2 )



### 1

2

3

Amo unt (Do lla rs) ( C ents) S i t e / P r o jec t

(Ma x 8 ) Co st Org/Co d e

(Ma x 7 )



### 1

2

3

EP A For m 2340

- 15 (Re v

. 8- 94 ) Electronic and paper versions acceptable. (WebF orms v1.0)

Previous editions are obsolete. COP Y 1 – PR IN TING MANAGE MENT OFFI CER
Exhibit 32.1

                                  Certification
              Pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


The undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of
Mid-Wisconsin Financial Services, Inc. (the "Mid-Wisconsin") certify pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that
(1) the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Mid-Wisconsin for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 2005 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. 78m or
78o(d), and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Mid-
Wisconsin.

 Date:  March 23, 2006
                                   JAMES F. WARSAW
                                   James F. Warsaw
                                   President and Chief Executive Officer


                                   RHONDA R. KELLEY
                                   Rhonda R. Kelley
                                   Controller (Principal Financial Officer)
**Exhibit 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Amendment No. 3 to Registration Statement Nos. 333-192577,333-192577-01 and 333-192577-02 of WFB Funding, LLC, Cabela’s Master Credit Card Trust, and Cabela’s Credit Card Master Note Trust on Form S-3 of our report dated March 28, 2016, relating to the Report on Compliance with ServicingCriteria Pursuant to Item 1122 of Regulation AB for World’s Foremost Bank, appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of WFB Funding, LLC, Cabela’s Master Credit Card Trust, and Cabela’s Credit Card Master Note Trust forthe year ended December 31, 2015.
§ 162.370 When will a cancellation of a residential lease be effective? ( a ) A cancellation involving a residential lease will not be effective until 31 days after the lessee receives a cancellation letter from us, or 41 days from the date we mailed the letter, whichever is earlier.
( b ) The cancellation decision will not be effective if an appeal is filed unless the cancellation is made immediately effective under part 2 of this chapter. While a cancellation decision is ineffective, the lessee must continue to pay rent and comply with the other terms of the lease.
### §860c. Art. 60c. Entry of judgment

(a) Entry of Judgment of General or Special Court-martial.—(1) In accordance with rules prescribed by the President, in a general or special court-martial, the military judge shall enter into the record of trial the judgment of the court. The judgment of the court shall consist of the following:

(A) The Statement of Trial Results under section 860 of this title (article 60).

(B) Any modifications of, or supplements to, the Statement of Trial Results by reason of—

(i) any post-trial action by the convening authority; or

(ii) any ruling, order, or other determination of the military judge that affects a plea, a finding, or the sentence.

(2) Under rules prescribed by the President, the judgment under paragraph (1) shall be—

(A) provided to the accused and to any victim of the offense; and

(B) made available to the public.

(b) Summary Court-martial Judgment.—The findings and sentence of a summary court-martial, as modified by any post-trial action by the convening authority under section 860b of this title (article 60b), constitutes the judgment of the court-martial and shall be recorded and distributed under rules prescribed by the President.

(Added Pub. L. 114–328, div. E, title LIX, §5324, Dec. 23, 2016, 130 Stat. 2927.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective on Jan. 1, 2019, as designated by the President, with implementing regulations and provisions relating to applicability to various situations, see section 5542 of Pub. L. 114–328 and Ex. Ord. 13825, set out as notes under section 801 of this title.
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Somsak Chivavibul,
certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period
covered by this report on Form 10-K of SLM Student Loan Trust 2012-2 (the Exchange Act periodic reports);

2. Based on my
knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing
and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required under this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as
disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer and administrator have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreement and administration agreement, as applicable, in all material respects; and

5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on
assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this
report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K. In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as indenture trustee.

Date: March 27, 2014



|                                                                     
|---------------------------------------------------------------------
|/S/ SOMSAK CHIVAVIBUL                                                
|Somsak Chivavibul                                                    
|President and Chief Financial Officer (Senior Securitization Officer)
|SLM Funding LLC
OFFICIAL NOTICE FROM COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS P.O. BOX 12308, CAPITOL STATION, AUSTIN, TEXAS 7871 I



# RETt**·;·-.~~:'d-** 1

## ~'wt! 

## ..**f","l~** i',**~:** _ .... :P :0**~~-~** -! \V't 1- 

### 1 --- 

# p**~-·v:..,.....** 

# . .. 1- .:..; • \ 6/22/2015

### ~3!**~,.'\.~#~ !17,t~**  

### \.,· •. • ., .(;,!:; ALEXANDER, WALTON

## JOH~~A~A"'~~~~A~b~R,_J.QI;!~.,~~LTON Tr.**C~.** No. CR10295C**··\~, ""~~..,.,.-,.,.<**  

## iJY ·**~R~53,367-0~** On this day, the

### sup~lemental**clerR~~~?:~~;j~p~iresponse** to the order 1ssued by this Court, has been received and presented·to the Court.

. l

.. ·

WALTON JOHN ALEXANDER 

### GLEMDHS UMff

- TDC 

### #799196 .Qe01 SPUR 5§1**AMA~ILLO,** 'fX 79107 9608- 

## / tJLI 3 

# 0-t.a.v, Rc 

# >-e..**-~-** 

# ./f..u.r**S~l,~o,'/IR\** 

# TK**.(pl./--D~** Abel Acosta, Clerk
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-13-00061-CR

Archie Atkins

v.

The State of Texas

§

§

§

§

§

From the 371st District Court

of Tarrant County (1277396D)

December 4, 2014

Opinion by Justice Gardner

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of 

the trial court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By __/s/ Anne Gardner____________

 Justice Anne Gardner
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-1299

KARL DAVID; JOHN DAVID, Plaintiffs - Appellants,
versus KENNETH G. MOSLEY, in his personal capacity; TAYLOR V. BLANTON, in his personal capacity, Defendants - Appellees, and JOHN DOES, I-III, unknown special agents of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms, in their personal capacities; SCOT MOSER, in his personal capacity; B. J. CROPPER, in his personal capacity; CAROLINE COUNTY; SHERIFF OF CAROLINE COUNTY, Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virgi nia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, District Judge. (CA-95-346-3) Argued: October 31, 1996 Decided: November 26, 1996 Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.2 Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
ARGUED: Richard E. Gardiner, Fairfax, Virginia, for Appellants. Robert William Jaspen, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia; Francis Walter Pedrotty, III, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appell ees. ON BRIEF: Helen F. Fahey, United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia; James S. Gilmore, III, Attorney General, Grace DiLiberto, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).* Bivens v. Six Unknown Fed. Narcotics Agents , 403 U.S. 388 (1971).
3 PER CURIAM: Karl David and John David appeal from the district court's entry of summary judgment against them on their Bivens * claimagainst Kenneth G. Mosley, a Special Agent with the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms (BATF), and their § 1983 claim against Taylor V. Blanton, a Virginia State Police Officer on assignment to BATF. Karl David was a federally licensed firearms dealer who ran his business out of the home he occupied with his son, John David. Based on information that Karl David (who was under indictment in Virginia for embezzlement) was receiving firearms shipments in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(n) and that Karl David had falsely denied on a BATF license renewal form, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(a)(1)(A), that he was under indictment for a crime punishable by a prison term exceeding one year, Agent Mosley obtained, and executed with the assistance of Officer Blanton, a search warrant for the home of Karl and John David. In their complaint the Davids claimed that the warrant was obtained and executed without probable cause and that the search exceeded the scope of the warrant. The district court rejected their claims, granting summary judgment to the officers. The Davids' appeal is now before us for decision. After considering the joint appendix, the briefs and the arguments of counsel, we affirm for the reasons stated in the4 district court's thorough opinion. See David v. Mosley , 915 F. Supp. 776 (E.D. Va. 1996).

AFFIRMED