alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________ 

Case No. 5D23-3273 

LT Case No. 2020-CF-016666-A 

 2020-CF-016667-A 

 2020-CF-016668-A 

2020-CF-016669-A 

2020-CF-016680-A 

2020-CF-012876-A 

_____________________________ 

KENYA BROWN, 

Appellant, 

v. 

STATE OF FLORIDA, 

Appellee. 

_____________________________ 

3.850 appeal from the Circuit Court for Brevard County. 

Tesha Ballou, Judge. 

Kenya Brown, Lawtey, pro se. 

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and 

Deborah A. Chance, Assistant Attorney General, 

Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

February 27, 2024 

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.315(a). 

WALLIS, EISNAUGLE, and MACIVER, JJ., concur. 
2 

_____________________________ 

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331. 

_____________________________
§ 163.60 Purpose and scope. ( a ) The Secretary shall provide a technical assistance program to ANCSA corporations to promote sustained yield management of their forest resources and, where practical and consistent with the economic objectives of the ANCSA Corporations, promote local processing and other value-added activities. For the purpose of this subpart, technical assistance means specialized professional and technical help, advice or assistance in planning, and providing guidance, training and review for programs and projects associated with the management of, or impact upon, Indian forest land, ANCSA corporation forest land, and their related resources. Such technical assistance shall be made available through contracts, grants or agreements entered into in accordance with the Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act (Pub. L. 93-638, as amended).
( b ) Nothing in this part shall be construed as: Affecting, modifying or increasing the responsibility of the United States toward ANCSA corporation forest land, or affecting or otherwise modifying the Federal trust responsibility towards Indian forest land; or requiring or otherwise mandating an ANCSA corporation to apply for a contract, grant, or agreement for technical assistance with the Secretary. Such applications are strictly voluntary.
PDR NO.

DANIEL FRANK LONGORIA JR.

Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

Appellee.

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL

APPEALS AT AUSTIN,. H5QC£L.W1W1^ ,,_ COURT OF CRfiWTNAL APPEALS

JUW 2 6 2015

MOTION FOR AN EXTENTION OF TIME TO FILE A Abel ACGSta Clerk

PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

GOMES NOW, Daniel Frank Longoria Jr., Appellant in the above

styled and numbered cause, and files his motion for an extention

of time^pursuant to rule 68.2(c) of the Texas Rules of Appfen/ia^e

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

Procedure, and shows this Honorable Court GOOD CAUSE to GRANT

JUN 26 2015

this motion as follows:

1- The Appellant was affirmed on June 25, 2014, Afe^el $S@SMiCUfork

District Court of Appeals at Beaumont. See Longoria v. State,

No. 09-13-00169-GR (Tex.App. —Beaumont June 25, 2014)(not design

ated for publication). The Appelant filed a Habeas proceeding

seeking for an out-of-time Petition, and this Honorable Court Gra

nted relief on June 3, 2015. See Ex Parte Daniel F. Longoria, Jr.

No. WR-83,036-01 (Tex.Crim.App. June 03, 2015)(Not designated for

publication).

2* There has been ho motion for rehearing filed or en banc

reconsideration filed, that the Appellant knows of. Additional

ly, there has been- no other extention of time filed within this

Honorable Court.

3* The Appellant is seeking for a 60 day extention in order

for the Appellant to properly file his Petition in a proper man

ner. The due date is currently July 3, 2015. The 60 day extenpage 1
tion will set the proposed date to September 1, 2015.

4* The Appellant is currently without counsel for his help,

and is proceeding in the pro se status.

5- Being a layman in the law, the Coffield Unit's law library

only allows for offenders to have 10-15 hours per.week to conduct

their research, properly prepare for filing, and reply to any

Court documents required.

6* The Appellant believes that he can meet the deadline on

September 1, 2015, in order-for. this Honorable Court to review in

a timely manner.

PRAYER

The Appellant prays that this Honorable Court will GRANT this

motion and reset the due date to September 1, 2015, or in the air

ternative, reset the current due date to a reasonable time frame

in order for the Appellant to properly file his petition on his

own behalf./

INMATE DECLARATION

I, Daniel F. Longoria Jr .,. #01851803 , being currently incar

cerated in the TDCJ-CID Coffield unit in. Anderson County, Texas,

declares that the foregoing is true and correct under the penalty

of perjury. EXECUTED THIS DAY OF JUNE 15, 2015.

Daniel Frank 'tongoria Jr.

Coffield unit -- #01851803

2661 FM 2054

Tenn.Colony, Tx. 75884

Pro se.

PROOF OF MAILING

I, Daniel F. Longoria Jr., #01851803, declares under the penpage 2
alty of perjury that I have placed this motion in the internal

mail box of the Coffield unit in Anderson County, Texas on June

15, 2015.

Daniel FrankT^ongoria Jr.

Coffield unit -- #01851803

2661 FM 2054

Tenn.Colony, Tx. 75884

Pro se.

page 3 of 3
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22
- 7231

JEOVANNY D. RODRIGUEZ

- PORRAS , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. DEMETRIUS A. CLARK; MS. WHITE; NURSE PIEARE; NURSE ALLEN; DR. RAVEN J. BARNES , Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Raleigh

. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. ( 5:21

- ct

- 03275

- BO )

Submitted : February 24, 2023 Decided: March 28, 2023

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge , HEYTENS, Circuit Judge , and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge

.
Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

. Jeovanny D. Rodriguez

- Porras , Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 22-7231 Doc: 12 Filed: 03/28/2023 Pg: 1 of 22 PER CURIAM:
Jeova nny D. Rodriguez

- Porras appeals the district court’s order denying his postjudgment motion for a preliminary injunction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Rodriguez

- Porras’ motion for appointment of counsel an d affirm the district court’s order. Rodriguez

- Porras v. Bertie Corr. Inst. , No. 5:21

- ct

- 03275

- BO (E.D.N.C. Oct. 6, 2022). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED USCA4 Appeal: 22-7231 Doc: 12 Filed: 03/28/2023 Pg: 2 of 2
- 000100fc
- 000200fi
- 00030001
- 00040002
- 00050003
- 00060004
- 00070000
- 00080000
- 00090000
- 00100000
- 00110005
- 00120006
- 00130000
- 00140000
- 00150000
- 00160000
- 00170000
- 00180000
- 00190000
- 00200000
- 00210000
- 00220000
- 00230000
- 00240000
- 00250000
- 00260000
- 00270000
- 00280000
- 00290000
- 00300000
- 00310000
- 00320000
- 00330000
- 00340000
- 00350000
- 00360000
- 00370000
- 00380000
- 00390000
- 00400000
- 00410000
- 00420007
- 004300bi
- 004400bc
§ 1187.50 How will OIED evaluate awardees' performance? Not later than one year after the date on which OIED awards a grant to an eligible applicant under the IBIP, and annually thereafter for the duration of the grant, OIED will conduct an evaluation of, and prepare a report on, the awardee, which will: ( a ) Describe the performance of the eligible applicant; and
( b ) Be used in determining the ongoing eligibility of the eligible applicant.
### Geology of the southern Salinas Valley area, California

By: David Leon Durham

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/pp819

#### Links

- More information:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**                            (html)
-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (29645 pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (7986 pdf)                        
  - **Plate 2**                            (4251 pdf)                        
  - **Plate 3**                            (6087 pdf)                        
  - **Plate 4**                            (7849 pdf) 
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
EXHIBIT 32


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, the
undersigned officer of Bentwood Acquisition Corporation
 (the "Company"), hereby certify to my knowledge that:

The Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2011 of the Company fully complies, in all material respects,
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the
Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by
the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.


                             /s/ James Cassidy
                                 Chief Executive Officer
                                 Chief Financial Officer
Date: March 28, 2012
#### § 225.34 [Reserved]
NOAA Marine Debris Program Accomplishments 2007

Partnerships

American Chemistry Council

NOAA is currently serving on the advisory group for the American Chemistry Council 

Plastics Division Marine Debris Workshop. The purpose of the workshop is to bring 

together leaders from a diverse array of organizations to focus attention on solutions for 

the marine debris issue and explore how groups from all involved sectors can coordinate 

efforts for long-term solutions.

National Fish and Wildlife Foundation

The NOAA Marine Debris Program (MDP) is in its third year of partnership with the 

National Fish and Wildlife Foundation. This partnership was born of the need for an 

established Federal funding opportunity for organizations external to NOAA. These 

projects include a match of in-kind services, with the Federal contribution being greater 

than 1.5. The focus for these projects include Ports and Marinas, Marine Debris 

Research, and Prevention.

The Walt Disney Company

NOAA and The Walt Disney Company, along with the Ad Council, National Marine 

Sanctuaries Foundation, and Environmental Defense, entered into a partnership in 2006 

to “Promote Marine Debris Awareness and Young Stewards of the Ocean” through the 

re-release of The Little Mermaid. This partnership has continued into 2007 and includes 

radio and television public service announcements, as well as a website and video game: 

www.KeepOceansClean.org.

• Keep Oceans Clean Ocean Awareness Campaign – The Game

The Keep Oceans Clean Ocean Awareness Campaign now has a new marine 

debris game online that children and adults alike can play to learn about marine 

debris. Also available on the Web site is information on how each of us can help 

keep our oceans clean, links to great ocean awareness games online, and links to 

excellent ocean resources for parents and teachers. For more information and to 

play the game, visit http://www.keepoceansclean.org/.

Ocean Conservancy

NOAA and the Ocean Conservancy have enjoyed a fruitful partnership for many years. 

From the Marine Debris Program’s perspective, in the past three years NOAA has joined 

Ocean Conservancy in several nationwide efforts to educate citizens on the problems of 

marine debris. One such effort is in the form of the International Coastal Cleanup. Over

15 M tons of trash was collected by NOAA teams alone during the 2006 event. NOAA 

offices also donated a total of 127 volunteers, whose participation in this event was 

coordinated by the Marine Debris Program in the Office of Response and Restoration.
### SUBCHAPTER IV—DEFENSE INDUSTRIAL RESERVE AND INDUSTRIAL MOBILIZATION

Sec.
4881.
Defense Industrial Reserve.
4882.
Industrial mobilization: orders; priorities; possession of manufacturing plants; violations.
4883.
Industrial mobilization: plants; lists.
4884.
Industrial mobilization: Board on Mobilization of Industries Essential for Military Preparedness.
# C_2006178EN.01003801.xml

| 29.7.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 178/38 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.7.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 178/38

---

Action brought on 13 June 2006 — European Association of Euro-Pharmaceutical Companies v Commission

(Case T-153/06)

(2006/C 178/68)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: European Association of Euro-Pharmaceutical Companies (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: W. Rehmann, M. Hartmann-Rüppel, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | Declare the application for annulment admissible; |
| --- | --- |

—

Declare the application for annulment admissible;

| — | annul Commission Decision D/201953, dated 10 April 2006, rejecting three complaints of EAEPC against GlaxoSmithKline for infringement of Article 82 EC; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul Commission Decision D/201953, dated 10 April 2006, rejecting three complaints of EAEPC against GlaxoSmithKline for infringement of Article 82 EC;

| — | order the Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The applicant seeks the annulment of the Commission's decision in cases COMP/38.181, 38.274 and 38.275 — EAEPC/Glaxo Greece (Imigran, Lamictal, Severent) relating to three complaints of the applicant arguing that the Greek subsidiary of GlaxoSmithKline would infringe Article 82 EC by refusing to supply the three products Imigran, Lamictal and Severent to Greek pharmaceutical wholesalers and therewith limiting parallel trade. The contested decision informs the complainant that the Greek Competition Authority is dealing with the case and rejects the complaints pursuant to Article 13 of Council Regulation No 1/2003 (1).

1

In support of its application, the applicant submits that the Commission has infringed the obligation to give a sufficient statement of reasons. According to the applicant, a mere reference to the wording of Article 13 of Regulation No 1/2003 is not sufficient to allow the complainant to assess whether the Commission has taken into account all facts and circumstances and the judiciary to exercise its power of review.

The applicant furthermore submits that the Commission has infringed Article 211 and 85 EC and Regulation No 1/2003 by not taking back the responsibility of a case from the Greek Competition Authority under Article 11(6) of Regulation 1/2003. According to the applicant, the Commission failed to take into account that the national procedure takes too long to achieve a sufficient result, that the complaints raised new and fundamental questions of EC competition law and addressed problems that exist in more than one Member State, and that the Commission has to assure the efficient enforcement of EC competition law.

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 of 16 December 2002 on the implementation of the rules on competition laid down in Articles 81 and 82 of the Treaty (Text with EEA relevance) (OJ L 1, p. 1).

1

---
#### § 213.7 Fees.

The provisions of § 211.25 of this chapter, or as hereafter amended, are applicable to this part.

[24 FR 7949, Oct. 2, 1959. Redesignated at 47 FR 13327, Mar. 30, 1982]
#### § 181.3 Am I eligible to receive a program grant?

The Indian Highway Safety Program grant is available to any federally recognized tribe. Because of the limited financial resources available for the program, the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) is unable to award grants to all applicants. Furthermore, some grant recipients may only be awarded a grant to fund certain aspects of their proposed tribal projects.
§ 2.822 What happens if I do not submit my Appeal within the 30-day deadline? If you fail to submit your Appeal within the 30-day deadline: ( a ) The decision-maker's decision will be effective;
( b ) The Statement of Performance at issue will be deemed accurate and complete;
( c ) You will have waived your right to invoke the remainder of the review and appeals process as to that same Statement of Performance; and
( d ) You will have failed to exhaust the administrative remedies available within the Department.
### §3014. Nontraditional defense contractor

In this part, the term "nontraditional defense contractor", with respect to a procurement or with respect to a transaction authorized under section 4021(a) or 4022 of this title, means an entity that is not currently performing and has not performed, for at least the one-year period preceding the solicitation of sources by the Department of Defense for the procurement or transaction, any contract or subcontract for the Department of Defense that is subject to full coverage under the cost accounting standards prescribed pursuant to section 1502 of title 41 and the regulations implementing such section.

(Added and amended Pub. L. 116–283, div. A, title XVIII, §1806(b)(1), (5), Jan. 1, 2021, 134 Stat. 4153, 4154; Pub. L. 117–263, div. A, title X, §1081(a)(4), Dec. 23, 2022, 136 Stat. 2797.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

The text of par. (9) of section 2302 of this title, which was transferred to this section and amended by Pub. L. 116–283, §1806(b)(5), was based on Pub. L. 111–383, div. A, title VIII, §866(g)(1), Jan. 7, 2011, 124 Stat. 4298; Pub. L. 113–291, div. A, title X, §1071(a)(2)(B), Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3504; Pub. L. 114–92, div. A, title VIII, §815(b), Nov. 25, 2015, 129 Stat. 896.

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 3014 was renumbered section 7014 of this title.

Another prior section 3014, acts Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 158, §3013; Aug. 6, 1958, Pub. L. 85–599, §8(a), 72 Stat. 519; Sept. 2, 1958, Pub. L. 85–861, §1(58), 72 Stat. 1462; Aug. 14, 1964, Pub. L. 88–426, title III, §305(3), 78 Stat. 422; Dec. 1, 1967, Pub. L. 90–168, §2(12), 81 Stat. 523; Dec. 31, 1970, Pub. L. 91–611, title II, §211(a), 84 Stat. 1829; Nov. 9, 1979, Pub. L. 96–107, title VIII, §820(b), 93 Stat. 819; Sept. 24, 1983, Pub. L. 98–94, title XII, §1212(c)(1), 97 Stat. 687; renumbered §3014, Oct. 1, 1986, Pub. L. 99–433, title V, §501(a)(2), 100 Stat. 1034, related to Under Secretary and Assistant Secretaries of the Army, appointment, and duties, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 99–433, §501(a)(5).

Another prior section 3014 was renumbered section 3015 of this title and subsequently repealed.

#### Amendments

2022—Pub. L. 117–263 substituted "section 4021(a) or 4022" for "section 4002(a) or 4003".

2021—Pub. L. 116–283, §1806(b)(5), transferred par. (9) of section 2302 of this title to this section, realigned margin, struck out par. (9) designation at beginning, and substituted "In this part, the term" for "The term" and "section 4002(a) or 4003" for "section 2371(a) or 2371b".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section and amendment by Pub. L. 116–283 effective Jan. 1, 2022, with additional provisions for delayed implementation and applicability of existing law, see section 1801(d) of Pub. L. 116–283, set out as an Effective Date of 2021 Amendment note preceding section 3001 of this title.
§ 11.712 Closing estate. ( a ) Upon finding that the estate has been fully administered and is in a condition to be closed, the court shall enter an order closing the estate and discharging the executor or administrator.
( b ) If an order closing the estate has not been entered by the end of nine months following appointment of executor or administrator, the executor or administrator shall file a written report with the court stating the reasons why the estate has not been closed.
§ 162.108 What are BIA's responsibilities in administering and enforcing agricultural leases? ( a ) We will ensure that tenants meet their payment obligations to Indian landowners, through the collection of rent on behalf of the landowners and the prompt initiation of appropriate collection and enforcement actions. We will also assist landowners in the enforcement of payment obligations that run directly to them, and in the exercise of any negotiated remedies that apply in addition to specific remedies made available to us under these or other regulations.
( b ) We will ensure that tenants comply with the operating requirements in their agricultural leases, through appropriate inspections and enforcement actions as needed to protect the interests of the Indian landowners and respond to concerns expressed by them. We will take immediate action to recover possession from trespassers operating without an agricultural lease, and take other emergency action as needed to preserve the value of the land.
[66 FR 7109, Jan. 22, 2001, as amended at 77 FR 72474, Dec. 5, 2012]
H. Res. 401

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

January 27, 2000.

Resolved, That a committee of two Members be appointed by the Speaker on the part of the House of Representatives to join with a committee on the part of the Senate to notify the President of the United States that a

quorum of each House has assembled and Congress is ready

to receive any communication that he may be pleased to

make.

Attest:

Clerk.
Page 1 of 1 

 

POST FOCUS EXPOSURE REPORT 

Release information for this compound does not meet criteria for preparation of an exposure assessment; 

were eliminated and the were below the threshold for exposure 

assessment 

Assessor: 

 

ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES 

Scenario#: Number of Release Sites: 

Release Activity: 

Release Description: WATER LANDFILL INCINER LAND/INCIN FUGITIVE 

Total Releases: 

 

(kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) 

Release Days/yr: 

 

Per Site Release: 

(kg/day) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/day) 

Remarks: EAB DROP: Release information for this compound does not meet criteria for preparation 

of an exposure assessment in the Exposure Assessment Branch=s (EAB) Initial Review 

Exposure Report (this report).
#### In the Matter of Abraham A. Joseph.

Motion restored to calendar for Friday, April 10, 1908.