alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS**

 

I, Brian E. Schaaf, certify that:

 

1.                                     I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Ford Credit Auto Owner Trust 2012-A (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);

 

2.                                     Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.                                     Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

 

4.                                     I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer and based on my knowledge and the compliance review conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and

 

5.                                     All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

 

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: The Bank of New York Mellon, as indenture trustee of the issuing entity, and U.S. Bank Trust National Association, as owner trustee of the issuing entity.

 

Dated March 23, 2016

 
|   | /s/ Brian E. Schaaf                                |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------|
|   | Brian E. Schaaf                                    |
|   | Vice President and   Assistant Treasurer           |
|   | Ford Motor Credit   Company LLC, as Servicer       |
|   | (senior officer in   charge of servicing function) |

 

----
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Lester Cooper, Appellant.

[823 NYS2d 917]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Orange County (Berry, J.), rendered August 30, 2005, convicting him of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s claim that the court should have conducted a further inquiry at sentencing in light of his assertion of innocence in the presentence investigation report is unpreserved for appellate review *(see People v Pellegrino,*60 NY2d 636 [1983]; *People v Tinsley,*32 AD3d 447 [2006]; *People v Steed,*133 AD2d 433 [1987]). The rare case exception to the preservation requirement is inapplicable *(see People v Lopez,*71 NY2d 662, 666 [1988]; *People v Mead,*27 AD3d 767, 767-768 [2006]). In any event, the record demonstrates that the defendant’s plea of guilty was valid *(see People v Fiumefreddo,*82 NY2d 536, 543 [1993]; *People v Lopez,*71 NY2d 662, 666 [1988]; *People v Lewis,*61 NY2d 9, 17).

The defendant’s claim that the court erred in fading to, sua sponte, order an examination to determine if he had a clear head and understood the plea proceeding is without merit *(see People v Ramirez,*29 AD3d 1022 [2006]; *People v Pryor,*11 AD3d 565, 566 [2004]; *People v Gomez,*256 AD2d 356 [1998]; *People v Rowley,*222 AD2d 718 [1995]).

It is unnecessary to review the defendant’s challenge to his waiver of his right to appeal since the issues raised on this appeal would not have been foreclosed from review by a valid waiver of right to appeal *(cf. People v Stewart,*30 AD3d 624 [2006]). Miller, J.E, Santucci, Goldstein, Skelos and Lunn, JJ., concur.
December 20, 2012



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals PARKWAY DENTAL ASSOC IATES, P.A., POORAN G PAHLAVAN, H. TRAM

NGUYEN , AND SHANNON PRESLEY , Appellants
NO. 14

- 10

- 01239

- CV V.


### HO & HUANG PROPERTIE S, L.P. AND SW P ARKWAY MANAGEMENT, INC. , Appellee s

________________________________ This cause, an appeal from the judgment in favor of appellees, HO & HUANG PROPERTIES, L.P. AND SW PARKWAY MANAGEMEN T, INC. , signed, September 17, 2010, was heard on the transcript of th e record. We have inspected the record and find the trial court erred in granting summary judgment as to the breach

- of

- contract and anticipatory

- repudiation claims of appellant PARKWAY DENTAL ASSOC IATES, P.A. (“ Parkway ”) against appellees. Because we are reversing the trial court’s summary judgment as to these two claims, we also reverse the trial court’s award of attorney’s fees , litigation costs , and interest thereon against appellants

. We therefore order that the portions of the judgment that address P arkway’s breach

- of

- contract claim or Parkway’s anticipatory

- repudiation claim, or any one or more of the party’s respective requests for attorney’s fees or litigation costs are REVERSED and ordered severed and REMANDED for proceeding s in accordance with th is court’ s opinion. Further, we find no error in the remainder of the judgment and order it AFFIRMED

. For good cause, we order appellants, jointly and severally, to pay one

- half of all costs incurred in this appeal, and we order appellees, jointly and se verally, to pay one

- half of all costs incurred in this appeal. We further order this decision certified below for observance.
### §7804. Salvage claims by United States

(a) The Secretary of the Army may settle, or compromise, and receive payment of a claim by the United States for salvage services performed by the Department of the Army. Amounts received under this section shall be covered into the Treasury.

(b) In any case where the amount to be received by the United States is not more than $10,000, the Secretary of the Army may delegate his authority under subsection (a) to any person designated by him.

(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 271, §4804; Pub. L. 92–417, §1(3), Aug. 29, 1972, 86 Stat. 654; renumbered §7804, Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, §808(d), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1839.)

| Revised section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 4804 | 10:1863. | Oct. 20, 1951, ch. 524, §3, 65 Stat. 573. |

The words "under this section" are substituted for the words "for salvage services rendered". The words "consider, ascertain, adjust, determine" are omitted as covered by the word "settle", as defined in section 4801 of this title. The words "and receive payment of" are inserted for clarity and to conform to section 4803 of this title. The words "as miscellaneous receipts" are omitted as surplusage.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–232 renumbered section 4804 of this title as this section.

1972—Pub. L. 92–417 designated existing provisions as subsec. (a), struck out requirement that the Secretary of the Army discharge his functions under the direction of the Secretary of Defense, and added subsec. (b).

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2018 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 115–232 effective Feb. 1, 2019, with provision for the coordination of amendments and special rule for certain redesignations, see section 800 of Pub. L. 115–232, set out as a note preceding section 3001 of this title.
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

No. 04

- 14

- 00449

- CV

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE

– DIVISION OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION

, Appellant

v.

Ronald MENSCH

, Appellee

From the 73rd Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2010

- CI

- 02326 Honorable Barbara Hanson Nellermoe, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARION

, JUSTICE A NGELINI , AND JUSTICE CHAPA

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s Order Denying Plea to the Jurisdiction filed b y the Texa s Department of Insurance, Division of Workers’ Compensation is REVERSED and judgment is RENDERED dismissing Ronald Mensch’s claims against the Texa s Department of Insurance, Division of Workers’ Compensation

. For good cause, costs of appeal ar e assessed against the party that incurred them. T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 43.4.

SIGNED January 14, 2015.

_____________________________ Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice
# C_2013018EN.01000502.xml

| 22.1.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 18/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.1.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 18/5

---

Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries

2013/C 18/07

In accordance with Article 35(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), a decision has been taken to close the fishery as set down in the following table:

1

| Date and time of closure | 20.12.2012 |
| --- | --- |
| Duration | 20.12.2012-31.12.2012 |
| Member State | Germany |
| Stock or group of stocks | HER/4AB. |
| Species | Herring (Clupea harengus) |
| Zone | EU and Norwegian waters of IV north of 53° 30′ N |
| Type(s) of fishing vessels | — |
| Reference number | FS87TQ44 |

Date and time of closure

20.12.2012

Duration

20.12.2012-31.12.2012

Member State

Germany

Stock or group of stocks

HER/4AB.

Species

Herring (Clupea harengus)

Clupea harengus

Zone

EU and Norwegian waters of IV north of 53° 30′ N

Type(s) of fishing vessels

—

Reference number

FS87TQ44

---

(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.

1

---
§ 162.415 How must a business lease address ownership of permanent improvements? ( a ) A business lease must specify who will own any permanent improvements the lessee constructs during the lease term and may specify under what conditions, if any, permanent improvements the lessee constructs may be conveyed to the Indian landowners during the lease term. In addition, the lease must indicate whether each specific permanent improvement the lessee constructs will: ( 1 ) Remain on the leased premises, upon the expiration, cancellation, or termination of the lease, in a condition satisfactory to the Indian landowners, and become the property of the Indian landowners;
( 2 ) Be removed within a time period specified in the lease, at the lessee's expense, with the leased premises to be restored as closely as possible to their condition before construction of the permanent improvements; or
( 3 ) Be disposed of by other specified means.
( b ) A lease that requires the lessee to remove the permanent improvements must also provide the Indian landowners with an option to take possession of and title to the permanent improvements if the improvements are not removed within the specified time period.
# C_2013312EN.01001801.xml

| 26.10.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 312/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 312/18

---

Notification of the Lithuania’s national regulatory authority — National Control Commission for Prices and Energy (hereinafter ‘NCC’) — pursuant to Article 10(2) of Directive 2009/72/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning common rules for the internal market in electricity and repealing Directive 2003/54/EC regarding the designation of LITGRID AB as transmission system operator in Lithuania

2013/C 312/07

Following the Lithuania’s regulatory authority’s final decision regarding the certification of LITGRID AB as ownership unbundled transmission system operator (Article 9 of the Electricity Directive) of 27 August 2013 (NCC’s Resolution No O3-325 as of 27 August 2013 on designation of the transmission system operator and issue of electricity transmission licence), Lithuania has notified to the European Commission the official designation of this company as a transmission system operator operating in Lithuania in accordance with Article 10 of Directive 2009/72/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council.

Any additional information can be obtained at the following address:

| — | Rimgailė Baliūnaitė, the Chief Specialist of NCC Law Division, tel. +370 52397821, e-mail: rimgaile.baliunaite@regula.lt |
| --- | --- |

—

Rimgailė Baliūnaitė, the Chief Specialist of NCC Law Division, tel. +370 52397821, e-mail: rimgaile.baliunaite@regula.lt

| — | Aistija Zubavičiūtė, the Adviser of NCC Gas and Electricity Department, Electricity Division, tel. +370 52135342, e-mail: aistija.zubaviciute@regula.lt |
| --- | --- |

—

Aistija Zubavičiūtė, the Adviser of NCC Gas and Electricity Department, Electricity Division, tel. +370 52135342, e-mail: aistija.zubaviciute@regula.lt

NCC’s website regarding certification of LITGRID AB:

http://www.regula.lt/lt/naujienos/index.php?full=yes&id=25278

---
131 STAT. 1264 PUBLIC LAW 115–81—NOV. 2, 2017 

Public Law 115–81 

115th Congress 

An Act 

To designate the checkpoint of the United States Border Patrol located on United 

States Highway 77 North in Sarita, Texas, as the ‘‘Javier Vega, Jr. Border 

Patrol Checkpoint’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Javier Vega, Jr. Memorial Act 

of 2017’’. 

SEC. 2. FINDINGS. 

Congress finds the following: 

(1) A native of La Feria, Texas, Border Patrol Agent Javier 

Vega, Jr., served his country first a member of the United 

States Marines Corps and then proudly as a border patrol 

agent in the canine division with his dog, Goldie. 

(2) Agent Vega was assigned to the Kingsville, Texas, 

Border Patrol Station as a canine handler and worked primarily 

at the Sarita Border Patrol Checkpoint. 

(3) On August 3, 2014, Agent Vega was on a fishing trip 

with his family near Raymondville, Texas, when 2 criminal 

aliens attempted to rob and attack them. 

(4) Agent Vega was shot and killed while attempting to 

subdue the assailants and protecting his family. 

(5) Agent Vega is survived by his wife, parents, 3 sons, 

brother, sister-in-law, niece, and dog, Goldie. 

SEC. 3. DESIGNATION. 

The checkpoint of the United States Border Patrol located 

on United States Highway 77 North in Sarita, Texas, shall be 

known and designated as the ‘‘Javier Vega, Jr. Border Patrol Checkpoint’’. 

SEC. 4. REFERENCES. 

Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, 

or other record of the United States to the checkpoint described 

Javier Vega, Jr. 

Memorial Act 

of 2017. 

Nov. 2, 2017 

[S. 1617] 

PUBLIC LAW 115–81—NOV. 2, 2017 131 STAT. 1265 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—S. 1617: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 163 (2017): 

Aug. 3, considered and passed House. 

Oct. 10, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

in section 3 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Javier 

Vega, Jr. Border Patrol Checkpoint’’. 

Approved November 2, 2017.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News

                              -  1 
                              -  2 
                              -  3 
                              -  4 
                              -  5 

U.S. Coast Guard hosts congressional delegation in GuamMay 1, 2024 — On April 26, 2024, the team at U.S. Coast Guard Forces Micronesia/Sector Guam and Base Guam hosted a distinguished Congressional Delegation led by Congressman Sam Graves, Chairman of the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure and Congressman Mike Bost, Chairman of the House Committee on Veterans Affairs... MORE 

----

                              -  1 
                              -  2 
                              -  3 
                              -  4 
                              -  5 

2024 (327)June (34)May (81)April (65)March (51)February (50)January (46)2023 (825)2022 (1193)2021 (1066)2020 (1083)2019 (1166)2018 (1116)2017 (1356)2016 (1475)2015 (1408)2014 (904)2013 (32)2012 (4)

About DoDDoD CareersJoin the MilitaryNewsUSA.govPhotos & VideosPrivacy & SecurityTop Issues

US INDOPACOM Inspector GeneralDoD Inspector General Accessibility/Section 508DoD FOIAUS INDOPACOM FOIALink DisclaimerNo FEAR ActRecovery ActINDOPACOM Webmaster

                  - Facebook
                  - X
                  - YouTube
                  - Instagram
                  - RSS

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
IV

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 18

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that any unified budgetary surplus achieved by the end of fiscal year 2003 which is attributable

to a surplus in the Social Security trust funds be saved for investment

in the Social Security Program.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 6, 1999

Mr. PASCRELL submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on Ways and Means

RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that

any unified budgetary surplus achieved by the end of

fiscal year 2003 which is attributable to a surplus in

the Social Security trust funds be saved for investment

in the Social Security Program.

Whereas the old-age, survivors, and disability insurance program under title II of the Social Security Act has drastically reduced the rate of poverty among seniors, and, if

such program did not exist, the rate of poverty among

seniors would be 54 percent rather than the current rate

of 10.8 percent;

Whereas the Board of Trustees of the Federal Old-Age and

Survivors Insurance Trust Fund estimates that the Trust

Fund will become insolvent by the year 2032;
2

•HRES 18 IH

Whereas the number of people over age 65 will double by the

year 2030;

Whereas the number of workers paying into Social Security

per beneficiary is expected to drop from 3.3 to 2 by the

year 2030;

Whereas the Congressional Budget Office projects that the

Treasury would have no unified budget surplus for at

least the next 4 years if there were no surplus in the

Federal Old-Age and Survivors Insurance Trust Fund

and the Federal Disability Insurance Trust Fund; and

Whereas, after a year of bipartisan dialogue on saving Social

Security, the House of Representatives has a responsibility now to address the solvency issues facing the old-age,

survivors, and disability insurance program under title II

of the Social Security Act: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Rep2 resentatives that any amount of unified budget surplus

3 that is achieved by the end of fiscal year 2003 which is

4 attributable to surplus in the Federal Old-Age and Sur5 vivors Insurance Trust Fund and the Federal Disability

6 Insurance Trust Fund should not be spent, but rather it

7 should be saved for investment in the old-age, survivors,

8 and disability insurance program under title II of the So9 cial Security Act.

Æ
Exhibit 99.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the First Reserve, Inc. (the Company) Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
I, Allen C. Harper, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



| | (i) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | ---- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                  
|------------------
|Date: May 14, 2003
|
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS Appeal of

-- ) ) Hensel Phelps Kiewit Joint Venture ) ) Under Contract No. W912DR-13-C-0005 ) APPEARANCES FORTHE APPELLANT:

APPEARANCES FORTHE GOVERNMENT: ASBCA No. 60334

Todd R. Metz, Esq. Brian R. Dugdale, Esq.

Varela, Lee, Metz & Guarino, LLP Tysons Comer, VA R. Miles Stanislaw, Esq.

Watt, Tieder, Hoffar & Fitzgerald, LLP Seattle, WA Thomas H. Gourlay, Jr., Esq.

Engineer ChiefTrial Attorney Scott C. Seufert, Esq. David B. Jerger, Esq.

Assistant District Counsel U.S. Army Engineer District, Baltimore ORDER OF DISMISSAL The dispute has been settled. The appeal is dismissed withprejudice. Dated: 10 July 2017

DAVID D'ALESSANDRIS Administrative Judge Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals

# I

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy ofthe Order ofDismissal ofthe Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals in ASBCA No. 60334, Appeal ofHensel Phelps Kiewit Joint Venture, rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. Dated:

2 JEFFREY D. GARDIN Recorder, Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals
###### Editorial Note on Part 224

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 224 appear at 84 FR 69611, Dec. 18, 2019.

#### § 224.100 May a person or entity ask the Secretary to review a Tribe's compliance with a TERA?

In accordance with this subpart, a person or entity that may be an interested party may submit to the Secretary a petition to review a Tribe's compliance with a TERA. However, before filing a petition with the Secretary, a person or entity that may be an interested party must first exhaust Tribal remedies, if a Tribe has provided for such remedies. If a Tribe has not provided for Tribal remedies, a person or entity that may be an interested party may file a petition directly with the Secretary.