alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 23
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 23 appear at 79 FR 27190, May 13, 2014.

§ 23.141 What records must the State maintain? ( a ) The State must maintain a record of every voluntary or involuntary foster-care, preadoptive, and adoptive placement of an Indian child and make the record available within 14 days of a request by an Indian child's Tribe or the Secretary.
( b ) The record must contain, at a minimum, the petition or complaint, all substantive orders entered in the child-custody proceeding, the complete record of the placement determination (including, but not limited to, the findings in the court record and the social worker's statement), and, if the placement departs from the placement preferences, detailed documentation of the efforts to comply with the placement preferences.
( c ) A State agency or agencies may be designated to be the repository for this information. The State court or agency should notify the BIA whether these records are maintained within the court system or by a State agency.
OFFICIAL NOTICE FROM COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS 

P.O. BOX 12308, CAPITOL STATION, AUSTIN, TEXAS 7871 I 

RETt ·;·-.~~:'d- 1 ~'wt! .. f","l~ i', ~: _ .... :P :0 ~~-~ -! \V't 1-1 --- p ~-·v:..,..... . .. 1- .:..; • \ 

6/22/2015 ~3! ~,.'\.~#~ !17,t~ \.,· •. • ., .(;,!:; 

ALEXANDER, WALTON JOH~~A~A"'~~~~A~b~R,_J.QI;!~.,~~LTON Tr. C~. No. CR10295C ··\~, ""~~..,.,.-,.,.< iJY · ~R~53,367-0~ 

On this day, the sup~lemental clerR~~~?:~~;j~p~iresponse to the order 1ssued by this 

Court, has been received and presented·to the Court. . l .. · 

WALTON JOHN ALEXANDER 

GLEMDHS UMff - TDC #799196 

.Qe01 SPUR 5§1 

AMA~ILLO, 'fX 79107 9608-

/ tJLI 3 0-t.a.v, Rc >-e.. -~- ./f..u.r S~l,~o,'/IR\ TK .(pl./--D~ 

Abel Acosta, Clerk
#### § 170.230 How long must a project financed through flexible financing remain on a TTPTIP?

Tribes must identify each TTP project financed through flexible financing along with the repayment amount on their annual TTPTIP until the flexible financing instrument has been satisfied.
### §145. Principal Advisor on Countering Weapons of Mass Destruction

The Secretary of Defense may designate, from among the personnel of the Office of the Secretary of Defense, a Principal Advisor on Countering Weapons of Mass Destruction. Such Principal Advisor shall coordinate the activities of the Department of Defense relating to countering weapons of mass destruction. The individual designated to serve as such Principal Advisor shall be an individual who was appointed to the position held by the individual by and with the advice and consent of the Senate.

(Added Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title X, §1082(a)(1), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1987.)
#### NATEYSHA MONK ET AL. *v.*TEMPLE GEORGE ASSOCIATES, LLC, ET AL.

The plaintiffs’ petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 82 Conn. App. 660 (AC 24275), is granted, limited to the following issue:

> “Did the Appellate Court properly affirm the decision of the trial court granting the defendants’ motion for summary judgment?”

*904The Supreme Court docket number is SC 17214.

Decided June 16, 2004

*Steven D. Jacobs,*in support of the petition.

*Jonathan A. Beatty,*in opposition.
### Geohydrology of the eastern part of Pahute Mesa, Nevada Test Site, Nye County, Nevada

By: Richard K. BlankennagelJ. E. Weir Jr.

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/pp712B

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 3**                            (pdf) 
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
156 So.2d 643

#### Phillip P. POUNDSTONE et al. v. J. F. SEWELL.

5 Div. 753.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

Sept. 26, 1963.

Rushton, Stakely & Johnston, Montgomery, for appellants.

Howard & Dunn, Wetumpka, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

This appeal is from a final decree of the Elmore Circuit Court, in equity, awarding relief to complainant on a bill of complaint and other pleadings and evidence that sought “to clear up any and all doubts and disputes concerning” some land described in the bill of complaint. The evidence was taken ore tenus.

Appellants assign several grounds of error upon which they rely to reverse the decree of the trial court and to remand the cause for trial de novo.

With the exception of assignment of error one, the appellants have not substantially argued the assignments of error. In view of such failure, we will not consider them. Supreme Court Rule 9; Epperson v. Stacey, 266 Ala. 396, 96 So.2d 750[6].

Assignment of error one reads as follows :

> *552“The Court below erred in failing to furnish Appellants with a complete transcript of the evidence in the cause.”

The court reporter who reported the case, after his separation from his duties for the judicial circuit in which the cause was tried, certified the incompleteness of the transcript of the testimony in the case that he prepared and filed. Title 7, Equity Rules, Rule 56. This certification was accompanied with a verified ex parte statement of his efforts to find the missing “stenographic” notes which he took of the missing evidence. It is not necessary for this court to pass upon the legal justification vel non of this explanatory statement.

We have held that it is only the ruling of the trial court which is the subject of an assignment of error. Central of Georgia Railway Company v. McDaniel, 262 Ala. 227, 78 So.2d 290[1, 2]; Madison Limestone Company v. McDonald, 264 Ala. 295, 87 So.2d 539 [18].

The record before us fails to show that any proceeding was initiated in the lower court, nor does it show that any ruling of the trial judge was invoked, in an effort to supply the missing evidence.

We pretermit any observations as to the appropriate procedure that could or should have been employed in the lower court to establish the omitted testimony. Such judicial observations here are unnecessary due to foreclosure of further proceedings in this cause by the affirmance here of the lower court’s decree. We parenthetically suggest that clarifying legislation would be advisable.

Since assignment of error one is without merit for its failure to present any ruling of the trial court, and no other assignments having been argued — which would have been a futile effort in view of the missing testimony — the final decree of the lower court is due to be affirmed, and it is so ordered.

The foregoing opinion was prepared by B. W. Simmons, Supernumerary Circuit Judge, while serving on the Supreme Court at the request of the Chief Justice, and was adopted by the court as its opinion.

Affirmed.

LAWSON, GOODWYN, MERRILL and HARWOOD, JJ., concur.
#### § 12.13 What happens if I do not follow the rules in this part?

Your BIA law enforcement commission may be revoked, your law enforcement contract may be canceled, and you may no longer be eligible for tribal shares allocated from the law enforcement budget.
# C_2006179EN.01001201.xml

| 1.8.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 179/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.8.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 179/12

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4262 — Carlyle/Vista/Turmed)

(2006/C 179/07)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 20 July 2006, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes. |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes.

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4262. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://ec.europa.eu/eur-lex/lex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4262. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://ec.europa.eu/eur-lex/lex)

---
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

August 17, 2018

No. 04

- 17

- 00579

- CV

Lee ROBIN

, Appellant

v.

M & T BANK CORPORATION

,

Appellee

From the 166th Judicial District Court, Bexar C ounty, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013CI19825 Honorable Laura Salinas, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

After this court granted two prior extensions of time, appellee’s brief is due August 29,

2018. Appellee has now filed a third motion for extension of time, asking for an additional fourteen days in which to file its brief. The motion is unopposed. After review, we GRANT appellee’s motion and ORDER appellee to file its brief in this court on or before Septe mber 12, 2018. Appellee is advised that no further extension of time to file the brief will be granted absent written proof of extraordinary circumstances

.

_________________________________ Marialyn Barnard, Just ice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 17th day of August, 20 18

.

___________________________________ KEITH E. HOTTLE

, Clerk of Court
IV

House Calendar No. 131

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 330

[Report No. 106–382]

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 3064) making appropriations

for the government of the District of Columbia and other activities

chargeable in whole or in part against revenues of said District for

the fiscal year ending September 30, 2000, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 13, 1999

Mr. LINDER, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution;

which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

RESOLUTION

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 3064) making

appropriations for the government of the District of Columbia and other activities chargeable in whole or in

part against revenues of said District for the fiscal year

ending September 30, 2000, and for other purposes.

1 Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution

2 it shall be in order without intervention of any point of

3 order to consider in the House the bill (H.R. 3064) mak4 ing appropriations for the government of the District of

5 Columbia and other activities chargeable in whole or in
2

HRES 330 RH

1 part against revenues of said District for the fiscal year

2 ending September 30, 2000, and for other purposes. The

3 bill shall be considered as read for amendment. The pre4 vious question shall be considered as ordered on the bill

5 to final passage without intervening motion except: (1) one

6 hour of debate equally divided and controlled by the chair7 man and ranking minority member of the Committee on

8 Appropriations; and (2) one motion to recommit.

House Calendar No. 131

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 330

[Report No. 106–382]

RESOLUTION

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 3064)

making appropriations for the government of theDistrict of Columbia and other activities chargeable in whole or in part against revenues of saidDistrict for the fiscal year ending September 30,2000, and for other purposes.

OCTOBER 13, 1999

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be

printed
dynt_ex101.htm

EXHIBIT 10.1
  
 October 1, 2021
  
 Millstone Medical Outsourcing, LLC
 580 Commerce Drive
 Fall River, MA 02720
  
 Attn: Karl Neuberger
 Cc: Tom Williams
  
 RE: Dynatronics – Millstone Medical Master Service Agreement 90-day Termination
  
 Mr. Neuberger:
  
 Dynatronics desires to terminate the Master Service Agreement signed July 8, 2020 (“MSA”). Notwithstanding any other provisions of the MSA, the parties agree that this letter shall serve as a 90-day notice of said termination. Dynatronics will exit Millstone Medical’s Olive Branch facility by December 31, 2021, after which, the MSA will be cancelled, terminated, null and void.
  
 Dynatronics agrees to continue to pay the monthly fees up to an including December 2021. Per Section 2c of the MSA, Dynatronics agrees to pay Millstone December’s fees within thirty (30) business days of the date of termination, and for the amount of any services performed up to the date of termination. Millstone agrees to continue service and aid in the transition to ensure a timely removal of Dynatronics’ products.
  
 Signatures below acknowledge the mutual understanding of the transfer and exit as outlined above.
  
 	 Dynatronics  
	  
	  
	 Millstone Medical Outsourcing  
	  

	  
	  
	  
	  
	  

	 /s/ John Krier
	  
	  
	 /s/Karl Neuberger
	  

		  
	  
		  

	 Its: President and CEO
	  
	  
	 Its: CEO
	  

	 Date: October 1, 2021 
	  
	  
	 Date: October 6, 2021
Exhibit 3.1

 

**CERTIFICATE OF FORMATION**

 

**OF**

 

**AMERICAN HONDA RECEIVABLES LLC**

 

This Certificate ofFormation of American Honda Receivables LLC(the “**Company**”),dated as of March 16, 2011, is duly executed and filed to form a limited liability company in accordance with the Delaware LimitedLiability Company Act (6 Del. C. §18-201, et seq.).

 

1.      Name. Thename of the limited liability company is American Honda Receivables LLC.

 

2.      RegisteredOffice. The address of its registered office in the State of Delaware is c/o The Corporation Trust Company, 1209 Orange Street,in the City of Wilmington, County of New Castle, 19801.

 

3.      Registered Agent.The name and address of its registered agent for service of process in the State of Delaware is The Corporation Trust Company,1209 Orange Street, in the City of Wilmington, County of New Castle, 19801.

 

**IN WITNESS WHEREOF**,the undersigned has executed this Certificate of Formation of American Honda Receivables LLC as of the 16th day of March, 2011.
# C_2013368EN.01001501.xml

| 17.12.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 368/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.12.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 368/15

---

Special report to the European Parliament made in accordance with Article 3(7) of the Statute of the European Ombudsman (1)

1

2013/C 368/10

The European Ombudsman addressed one special report to the European Parliament in 2013:

Special Report of 12 November 2013 following the European Ombudsman's own-initiative inquiry OI/5/2012/BEH-MHZ concerning Frontex.

The text of the special report is available on the European Ombudsman's website (http://www.ombudsman.europa.eu).

Paper copies can be requested free of charge from the European Ombudsman's office:

| 1 avenue du Président Robert Schuman |
| --- |
| CS 30403 |
| 67001 Strasbourg Cedex |
| FRANCE |
| Tel. +33 388172313 |
| Fax +33 388179062 |
| E-mail: eo@ombudsman.europa.eu |

1 avenue du Président Robert Schuman

CS 30403

67001 Strasbourg Cedex

FRANCE

Tel. +33 388172313

Fax +33 388179062

E-mail: eo@ombudsman.europa.eu

---

(1)  Decision 94/262/ECSC, EC, Euratom of the European Parliament of 9 March 1994 on the regulations and general conditions governing the performance of the Ombudsman's duties (OJ L 113, 4.5.1994, p. 15).

1

---
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News

Pacific Air Forces Airmen participate in multilateral logistics, safety symposium in New ZealandMay 22, 2024 — Ally and partner nations gathered in New Zealand for the annual Indo-Pacific Command and Pacific Air Forces C-130 and Fighter Logistics and Safety Symposium, or LASS... MORE 

----

Pacific leaders commemorate Anzac Day in Honolulu April 25, 2024 — HONOLULU — Multinational military and civilian leaders from across the Indo-Pacific region gathered to commemorate Australia and New Zealand Army Corps Day at the National Memorial Cemetery of the... MORE 

----

2024 (327)2023 (825)2022 (1193)2021 (1066)2020 (1083)2019 (1166)2018 (1116)2017 (1356)2016 (1475)2015 (1408)2014 (904)2013 (32)2012 (4)

About DoDDoD CareersJoin the MilitaryNewsUSA.govPhotos & VideosPrivacy & SecurityTop Issues

US INDOPACOM Inspector GeneralDoD Inspector General Accessibility/Section 508DoD FOIAUS INDOPACOM FOIALink DisclaimerNo FEAR ActRecovery ActINDOPACOM Webmaster

                  - Facebook
                  - X
                  - YouTube
                  - Instagram
                  - RSS

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
#### § 213.46 Field clerks.

Local representatives known officially as “field clerks” are located in the various districts comprising that part of the State of Oklahoma occupied by the Five Civilized Tribes. Such field clerks shall report to and act under the direction of the Area Director. Any and all counsel and advice desired by allottees concerning deeds, leases, or other instruments or matters relating to lands allotted to them shall be furnished by such field clerks free of charge. Field clerks shall not, during their term of employment, have any personal interest, directly or indirectly, in any transaction concerning leases covering lands of allottees or in the purchase or sale of any such lands regardless of whether the restrictions have or have not been removed. This prohibition, however, shall not apply to lands which such field clerks have legally acquired before their employment in the Bureau of Indian Affairs. Field clerks shall report to the Area Director at the end of each month the work performed during such period and special reports shall be made immediately of any apparently illegal transaction involving the estates or allotments of allottees.
### §637a. Continuation on active duty: officers in certain military specialties and career tracks

(a) In General.—The Secretary of the military department concerned may authorize an officer in a grade above grade O–2 to remain on active duty after the date otherwise provided for the separation or retirement of the officer in section 632, 633, 634, 635, or 636 of this title, as applicable, if the officer has a military occupational specialty, rating, or specialty code in a military specialty designated pursuant to subsection (b).

(b) Military Specialties.—Each Secretary of a military department shall designate the military specialties in which a military occupational specialty, rating, or specialty code, as applicable, assigned to members of the armed forces under the jurisdiction of such Secretary authorizes the members to be eligible for continuation on active duty as provided in subsection (a).

(c) Duration of Continuation.—An officer continued on active duty pursuant to this section shall, if not earlier retired, be retired on the first day of the month after the month in which the officer completes 40 years of active service.

(d) Regulations.—The Secretaries of the military departments shall carry out this section in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of Defense. The regulations shall specify the criteria to be used by the Secretaries of the military departments in designating military specialties for purposes of subsection (b).

(Added Pub. L. 114–328, div. A, title V, §505(a)(1), Dec. 23, 2016, 130 Stat. 2107; amended Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title V, §506, title X, §1081(a)(8), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1743, 1983; Pub. L. 116–92, div. A, title V, §504, Dec. 20, 2019, 133 Stat. 1345.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2019—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 116–92 inserted "separation or" after "provided for the".

2018—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 115–232, §506, substituted "grade O–2" for "grade O–4" and inserted "632," before "633,".

Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 115–232, §1081(a)(8), substituted "specialties" for "specialities".
|                                                                                                       |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                                                       |  |  |
| /s/ ZACHARY C. PARKERZachary C. Parker Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer) |   |   |
#### § 212.45 [Reserved]