alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No. 40836

STATE OF IDAHO ,
Plaintiff-Respondent ,

v.

STEVEN LEVON LANTZ ,
Defendant-Appellant

. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 2014 Unpublished Opinion No. 371

Filed: February 11, 2014

Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk

THIS I S AN UNPUBLISHED OPINION AND SHALL NOT BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Fo urth Judicial District, State of Idaho, Ada County. Hon. Thomas F. Neville , District Judge.

Order denying I.C.R. 35 motion for reduction of sentence, affirmed

.
Sara B. Thomas, State Appellate Public Defender; Sally J. Cooley, Deputy Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant.

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming, Deputy Attorney General, Boise, for respondent

.

________________________________________________ Before GUTIERREZ, Chief Judge; GRATTON, Judge; and MELANSON, Judge

PER CURIAM

Steven Levon Lantz pled guilty to robbery . I.C. § 18

- 6501, 18

- 6502, 18

- 204

. In
exchange for his guilty plea, the state agreed not to pursue an allegation that Lantz was a
persistent violator. The district court sentenced Lantz to a unified term of twenty years, with a
minimum period of confinement of seven years , but retained jurisdiction and sent Lantz to
participate in the rider program. Following completion of his rider, the district court relinquished
jurisdiction, but reduced Lantz’s sentence to a unified term of twenty years, with a minimum
period of confinement of six years

. Lantz filed an I.C.R 35 motion for reduction of his modified

sentence , which the district cou rt denied. Lantz appeals.
A motion for reduction of sentence under I.C.R. 35 is essentially a plea for leniency,

addressed to the sound discretion of the court. State v. Knigh ton , 143 Idaho 318, 319, 144 P.3d2 23, 24 (2006); State v. Allbee , 115 Idaho 845, 846, 771 P.2d 66, 67 (Ct. App. 1989). In
presenting a Rule 35 motion, the defendant must show that the sentence is excessive in light of
new or additional information subsequently provided to the district court in support of the

motion. State v. Huffman , 144 Idaho 201, 203, 159 P.3d 838, 84 0 (2007). An appeal from the
denial of a Rule 35 motion cannot be used as a vehicle to review the underlying sentence absent
the presentation of new information. Id. Because no new or additional information in support of

Lantz’s Rule 35 motion was prese nted, the district court did not abuse its discretion. Therefore,
the district court’s order denying Lantz ’s Rule 35 motion is affirmed.
§ 162.559 Must a lessee provide a performance bond for a WSR lease? The lessee must provide a performance bond or alternative form of security, except as provided in paragraph (f) of this section. ( a ) The performance bond or alternative form of security must be in an amount sufficient to secure the contractual obligations including: ( 1 ) No less than: ( i ) The highest annual rental specified in the lease, if the compensation is paid annually; or
( ii ) If the compensation is not paid annually, another amount established by BIA in consultation with the tribe for tribal land or, where feasible, with Indian landowners for individually owned Indian land;
( 2 ) The installation of any required permanent improvements;
( 3 ) The operation and maintenance charges for any land located within an irrigation project; and
( 4 ) The restoration and reclamation of the leased premises, to their condition at the start of the lease term or some other specified condition.
( b ) The performance bond or other security: ( 1 ) Must be deposited with us and made payable only to us, and may not be modified without our approval, except as provided in paragraph (b)(2) of this section; and
( 2 ) For tribal land, if the lease so provides, may be deposited with the tribe and made payable to the tribe, and may not be modified without the approval of the tribe.
( c ) The lease must specify the conditions under which we may adjust security or performance bond requirements to reflect changing conditions, including consultation with the tribal landowner for tribal land before adjustment.
( d ) We may require that the surety provide any supporting documents needed to show that the performance bond or alternative forms of security will be enforceable, and that the surety will be able to perform the guaranteed obligations.
( e ) The performance bond or other security instrument must require the surety to provide notice to us at least 60 days before canceling a performance bond or other security. This will allow us to notify the lessee of its obligation to provide a substitute performance bond or other security and require collection of the bond or security before the cancellation date. Failure to provide a substitute performance bond or security is a violation of the lease.
( f ) We may waive the requirement for a performance bond or alternative forms of security if: ( 1 ) The lease is for public purposes; or
( 2 ) The Indian landowners request it and we determine a waiver is in the Indian landowners' best interest.
( g ) For tribal land, we will defer to the tribe's determination that a waiver of the performance bond or alternative form of security is in its best interest, to the maximum extent possible.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

# Joint Statement on Advancing the U.S.-Mongolia Economic Partnership

U.S. Embassy in Mongolia

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Employers & Practitioners 
-  Reporting & Disclosure 
-  Submitting Annual Funding Notices 

This page has not been translated. Please go to PBGC.gov's Spanish home page for more information available in Spanish.

Esta página no ha sido traducida. Por favor vaya a la página principal del sitio de español de PBGC para ver información disponible en español.

# Submitting Annual Funding Notices

## Overview

ERISA section 101(f) provides annual funding notice requirements for single-employer and multiemployer plans.

**Single-Employer Plan Annual Funding Notices:** Under section 101(f) of ERISA and guidance issued by the Department of Labor, starting with plan years beginning on or after January 1, 2008, single-employer plans with liabilities that exceed plan assets by more than $50 million must provide PBGC with a copy of the Annual Funding Notice by the Annual Funding Notice due date. Single-employer plans with liabilities that exceed plan assets by $50 million or less must provide PBGC with a copy of the Annual Funding Notice within 30 days of receiving a written request from PBGC. See Department of Labor regulations at 29 CFR 2520.101-5(j) (see also the final rule published in 80 FR 5626).

Single-employer plans required to provide PBGC with a copy of the Annual Funding Notice should email it to single-employerAFN@pbgc.gov, or send it to:

PBGCATTN: Single-Employer AFN Coordinator445 12th Street SWWashington, DC 20024-2101

For questions on PBGC requirements regarding the Annual Funding Notice, call 202-229-4070 or email single-employerAFN@pbgc.gov.

**Multiemployer Plan Annual Funding Notices:** Multiemployer plans have separate reporting and disclosure requirements under ERISA section 101(f).

July 27, 2023
NOAA Marine Debris Program - FY2009 Accomplishments

Fishing for Energy -

http://marinedebris.noaa.gov/projects/fishing4energy.html

The Fishing for Energy partnership expanded in FY2009 to several additional ports in New England and 

Oregon, including Portland, ME; Sandwich, MA; and Newport and Garibaldi, OR. Since its beginning in 

February 2008, partnership ports have collected over 188 tons of old and derelict fishing gear.

Logo for Fishing for Energy
Derelict fishing nets being loaded into a typical Fishing for Energy bin. Photo credit B. Haskell.

Gulf of Mexico Marine Debris Project -

http://gulfofmexico.marinedebris.noaa.gov/

The NOAA Marine Debris Program, working with the Office of Coast Survey, has completed the Gulf of Mexico 

Marine Debris Project which began in September 2006 and was supported by $44 million in Congressional 

funding through two appropriations. Designed to survey, map, and conduct community outreach, the project 

surveyed over 1,550 square nautical miles from Mobile Bay, Alabama to the Louisiana/Texas border, and 

located over 7,000 debris items in offshore fishing and shrimping grounds impacted by Hurricanes Katrina and 

Rita. The project recently received an Environmental Protection Agency "Gulf Guardian" award for its work 

and partnerships in the region.
An image of collaboration: This image of a boat wreck in Louisiana’s near shore waters involved three NOAA Offices, three 

contractors to NOAA, two Louisiana State agencies, FEMA, and USCG.

Republic of Korea Joint Marine Debris Project - http://marinedebris.noaa.gov/projects/koreajpa.html

The most effective way to address the global problem of marine debris is to work across country boundaries 

to share best practices and information to eradicate it from its source. The objective of the 2009 Marine 

Debris Abatement Workshop was to transfer information on new technologies, strategies, and critical 

implementation information on nearshore marine debris prevention projects and techniques between the 

Republic of Korea and the United States in order to reduce the harmful impacts marine debris has on our 

coastal environment. The workshop was held in Honolulu, HI August 12-14, 2009. The results of this workshop 

included a summary report highlighting four Korean and four U.S. marine debris prevention projects.
The Korea Fisherman Debris Buyback Program (bin and reception area pictured above) is an incentive program that pays fishermen 

for derelict fishing gear and other marine debris that they bring in.
#### § 115.615 How long after the hearing will BIA make its final decision?

BIA will make its final decision within 10 business days of the end of the hearing.
§ 38.2 Information collection. ( a ) The information collection requirements contained in § 38.5 use Standard Form 171 for collection, and have been approved by OMB under 25 U.S.C. 2011 and 2015 and assigned approval number 3206-0012. The sponsoring agency for the Standard Form 171, is the Office of Personnel Management. The information is being collected to determine eligibility for employment. The information will be used to rate the qualifications of applicants for employment. Response is mandatory for employment.
( b ) The information collection requirement for § 38.14, Voluntary Services has been approved by the Office of Management and Budget under 44 U.S.C. 3501 *et seq.* and assigned clearance number 1076-0116. The information is being collected to determine an applicants eligibility and selection for appropriate volunteer assignments. Response is voluntary.
#### IN RE MORRIS v. DUKE POWER CO.

No. 562P89

Case below: 96 N.C.App. 510

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 10 May 1990.
###### Editorial Note on Part 224

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 224 appear at 84 FR 69611, Dec. 18, 2019.

#### § 224.160 How will reassumption affect a TERA?

Reassumption of a TERA applies to all of the authority and activities assumed under a TERA. Upon reassumption, the Tribe must also return all Departmental resources transferred under the TERA and any relevant records and documents to the Secretary.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 

Home : Media : Photos

slide show module

First Royal Australian Navy Enlisted Sailors Begin Training at U.S. Submarine School

Theodore Roosevelt Conducts Operations to Deter Threats

Valiant Shield Formation Flight

Abraham Lincoln conducts flight operations

Strike Fighter Squadron (VFA) 103 Conducts a Change of Command

George Washington Participates in Bilateral Exercises with Chile

JPMRC-X | 2-27th Infantry Regiment assaults simulated opposing forces

F-22s arrive in Guam for Valiant Shield 24

JPMRC-X | Philippine Army Special Forces engage simulated opposing forces

USS Ronald Reagan (CVN 76) conducts night flight operations in support of Valiant Shield 2024
#### Cecil D. MAYS, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.

No. 4940.

United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit.

Oct 12, 1954.

Cecil D. Mays pro se.

William C. Farmer, U. S. Atty., Wichita, Kan., Selby S. Soward, Asst. U. S. Atty., Topeka, Kan., for appellee.

Before PHILLIPS, Chief Judge, PICKETT, Circuit Judge, and RITTER, District Judge.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an order of the United States District Court of Kansas, denying appellant’s motion to vacate, a judgment and sentence entered in that court without a hearing. The motion was treated as having been filed under: 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255. Appellant entered ,a plea of guilty to an indictment charging him with the unlawful possession of narcotics in violation of 26 U.S.C.A. § 2553(a). Upon a plea of guilty, he was sentenced to serve a term of five years in prison.

The- motion alleges that the judgment and sentence is void because appellant was deprived of effective aid and assistance of counsel; that the attorney, George Haley, who appeared with the appellant at the time the plea of guilty was entered, was not admitted to prac*tice in the State and Federal Courts of Kansas; and that the attorney'induced *187him to enter a plea of guilty by trickery and fraud. The record does not disclose whether the attorney was appointed by the court or was of the appellant’s own selection. The record does not contain a transcript of the proceedings at the time the plea was entered. The judgment and sentence recite that the defendant was represented “by counsel George Haley for Myles Stevens”. We do not mean to indicate that a prisoner is entitled to a hearing on a motion filed under Section 2255 in all cases where it is alleged that he received ineffective aid and assistance of counsel, but under the allegations of this motion we believe that the appellant should be entitled to show all the facts and circumstances concerning the representation which he had at the time he entered his plea of guilty. Wheatley v. United States, 10 Cir., 198 F.2d 325.

The order denying the motion without a hearing is reversed, and the cause is remanded with instructions to grant a hearing on the motion.
USPACOM SPONSOR CHECKLIST

This checklist is a guide for sponsors to ensure the transition 

of newly assigned personnel is as smooth as possible.

Sponsor Responsibilities

Follow and complete the sponsor checklist.

Refer any questions, comments, or suggestions regarding this 

checklist to the respective J1 Service personnel.

Pre-Arrival

_____Establish contact with inbound Service member

_____Provide member with useful command phone numbers

_____Obtain addresses and phone numbers of member at transit and

 leave locations

_____Establish JKO account

_____Complete JKO (ISTOP Prereq Training) Training

_____Assist with email account establishment paperwork & network 

connectivity

_____Assist with security clearance requirements

_____Assist with scheduling ISTOP 

_____Assist with badge requirements

_____Direct to Quality of Life link on PACOM Newcomer webpage

_____Determine needs:

 Family status, special considerations

 Family members travel concurrently

 School requirements and desires

 TRI-CARE

 Spouse employment possibilities

 Day care

 Housing requirements and desires – on/off-base housing

 Personal transportation - if shipping Privately Owned

Vehicle (POV) you will need to provide a Hawaii 

vehicle registration and insurance requirements (DF-L 

50) to DMV. Service Elements will provide the DF-L 

50 to inbound Service Member upon arrival.

 Assess personal transportation needs upon arrival and 

provide rental car info if necessary

 Pets (advise member of Hawaii quarantine law)

_____Advise on uniform requirements
_____Temporary Housing Requirements

_____Temporary Lodging Allowance (TLA), contact Service housing 

office for additional information

_____Temporary lodging arrangements, must check in with Service 

lodging facilities for additional information

_____Schedule appointment with respective housing office

_____Make appointment with J1 for check-in process

Arrival

_____Meet the member (and family) at the airport

_____Assist member in getting to rental car agency if required

_____Escort member and family to their temporary lodging

_____Check for any special needs before departing temporary

lodging (location of commissary, exchange, baby 

formula, fast food?)

_____Provide member with directions outlining routes from 

lodging to Camp Smith

_____Ensure member knows how to contact you for assistance

_____Provide member emergency contact numbers (Command Duty

 Officer (CDO), Camp Smith)

_____Accompany to J1 for in-processing on the first duty day

following arrival
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 9, 2015

d0831 

# Order

Clerk September 9, 2015

149629(21)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 149629

COA: 320963

St. Clair CC: 04

- 001965

- FH

THOMAS PAUL HICKS

, Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s February 3,

2015 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was

entered erroneously.
157 So.2d 2

#### Ex parte Jimmy ARGO.

6 Div. 30.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

Oct. 17, 1963.

*577Jimmy Argo, pro se,

. Richmond M. Flowers, Atty. Gen., and John C. Tyson, III, Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondent.

LAWSON, Justice.

This is an original petition for mandamus.

The petition shows that petitioner, Jimmy Argo, is confined in jail in Jefferson County; that he filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus in the Circuit Court of Jefferson County wherein he sought his discharge on the ground that he had been denied *“a*fair and speedy trial”; that after a hearing petitioner was ordered remanded to jail; that petitioner has appealed from that order.

The purpose of the instant petition seems to be to have this court order the trial judge to retry the habeas corpus proceeding on the ground that he was denied a fair hearing on the trial which resulted in the order from which he has appealed.

If error was committed in the habeas corpus proceeding it will be corrected on appeal.

Writ of mandamus is denied.

Denied.

LIVINGSTON, C. J., and MERRILL and COLEMAN, JJ., concur.
TS-CDBA22

Attachment #2

Summary of Information on the New Chemical Substance
## PART I—ORGANIZATION

Chap.
Sec.
801.
Definitions
8001
803.
Department of the Navy
8011
805.
Office of the Chief of Naval Operations
8031
806.
Headquarters, Marine Corps
8041
807.
Composition of the Department of the Navy
8061
809.
Bureaus; Office of the Judge Advocate General
8071

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**2018**—Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, §807(f)(2), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1838, redesignated items for chapters 501 to 513 as 801 to 809 and redesignated section numbers 5001 to 5131 as 8001 to 8071.

**1994**—Pub. L. 103–337, div. A, title XVI, §1673(a)(2), Oct. 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 3015, struck out item for chapter 519 "Naval Reserve and Marine Corps Reserve".

**1986**—Pub. L. 99–433, title V, §514(d)(1), Oct. 1, 1986, 100 Stat. 1055, substituted "Office of the Chief of Naval Operations" for "Secretary, Under Secretary, and Assistant Secretaries of the Navy" in item for chapter 505, added item for chapter 506, substituted "Composition of the Department of the Navy" for "Office of the Comptroller of the Navy" in item for chapter 507, struck out item for chapter 509 "Office of the Chief of Naval Operations", struck out "; Office of Naval Research" after "General" in item for chapter 513, and struck out item for chapter 515 "Commandant of the Marine Corps; Headquarters, Marine Corps".

**1980**—Pub. L. 96–513, title V, §503(2), Dec. 12, 1980, 94 Stat. 2911, struck out item for chapter 517 "Fleet Commands and other High Positions".

**1977**—Pub. L. 95–82, title VI, §611(b), Aug. 1, 1977, 91 Stat. 378, struck out item for chapter 516 "Naval Districts".

**1967**—Pub. L. 90–110, title X, §1001(2), Oct. 21, 1967, 81 Stat. 310, added item for chapter 516.

**1966**—Pub. L. 89–718, §34(b), Nov. 2, 1966, 80 Stat. 1119, struck out item for chapter 511 "Office of the Chief of Naval Material".