alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
H. Res. 103

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

March 11, 1999.

Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule

XVIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee of the

Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of

the concurrent resolution (H. Con. Res. 42) regarding the use

of United States Armed Forces as part of a NATO peacekeeping operation implementing a Kosovo peace agreement.

The first reading of the concurrent resolution shall be dispensed with. General debate shall be confined to the concurrent resolution and shall not exceed two hours equally divided

and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member

of the Committee on International Relations. After general

debate the concurrent resolution shall be considered for

amendment under the five-minute rule. The concurrent resolution shall be considered as read. No amendment to the concurrent resolution shall be in order except those printed in

the portion of the Congressional Record designated for that

purpose in clause 8 of rule XVIII and except pro forma
2

•HRES 103 EH

amendments for the purpose of debate. Each amendment so

printed may be offered only by the Member who caused it to

be printed or his designee and shall be considered as read.

The Chairman of the Committee of the Whole may: (1) postpone until a time during further consideration in the Committee of the Whole a request for a recorded vote on any

amendment; and (2) reduce to five minutes the minimum

time for electronic voting on any postponed question that follows another electronic vote without intervening business,

provided that the minimum time for electronic voting on the

first in any series of questions shall be 15 minutes. At the

conclusion of consideration of the concurrent resolution for

amendment the Committee shall rise and report the concurrent resolution to the House with such amendments as may

have been adopted. The previous question shall be considered

as ordered on the concurrent resolution to final adoption

without intervening motion except one motion to recommit

with or without instructions.

Attest:

Clerk.
LAW DEPARTMENT

Transamerica Occidental Life
Insurance Company
1150 South Olive Street
Los Angeles, CA  90015

Telephone 213-742-3129
Fax 213-741-6623



March 11, 2005



Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20549

Re:  Transamerica  Occidental Life Insurance Company and Transamerica Occidental
     Life Separate Account VL (File No. 33-2022)

Dear Commissioner:

On behalf of  Transamerica  Occidental Life Insurance  Company and  Transamerica
Occidental  Life  Separate  Account VL  ("separate  account"),  incorporated  by
reference is the annual report for the underlying  fund, the EQ Advisers  Trust,
for filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission,  pursuant to Rule 30b2-1
under the Investment Company Act of 1940 ("Act").

         Filer/Entity:              EQ Advisers Trust
         File #:                    811-07953
         CIK #:                     0001027263
         Accession #:               0001193125-05-046435
         Date of Filing:            3-10-2005

This annual  report is for the period  ending  December 31,  2004,  and has been
transmitted to contract holders in accordance with Rule 30d-2 under the Act.


Very truly yours,



David M. Goldstein
Senior Vice President
### §2643. Commissary and exchange services: transportation overseas

(a) Transportation Options.—The Secretary of Defense shall authorize the officials responsible for operation of commissaries and military exchanges to negotiate directly with private carriers for the most cost-effective transportation of commissary and exchange supplies to destinations outside the continental United States without relying on the Air Mobility Command, the Military Sealift Command, or the Military Traffic Management Command. Section 2631 of this title, regarding the preference for vessels of the United States or belonging to the United States in the transportation of supplies by sea, shall apply to the negotiation of contracts for sea-borne transportation under the authority of this section.

(b) Payment of Transportation Costs.—Section 2483(b)(5) of this title, regarding the use of appropriated funds to cover the expenses of operating commissary stores, shall apply to the transportation of commissary supplies and products. Appropriated funds for the Department of Defense shall also be used to cover the expenses of transporting exchange supplies and products to destinations outside the continental United States. Such appropriated funds may be supplemented with additional funds derived from improved management practices implemented pursuant to sections 2481(c)(3) and 2487(c) of this title.

(Added Pub. L. 104–106, div. A, title III, §334(a), Feb. 10, 1996, 110 Stat. 261; amended Pub. L. 109–163, div. A, title VI, §673, Jan. 6, 2006, 119 Stat. 3319; Pub. L. 114–328, div. A, title VI, §661(h), Dec. 23, 2016, 130 Stat. 2172.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2016—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 114–328 inserted at end "Such appropriated funds may be supplemented with additional funds derived from improved management practices implemented pursuant to sections 2481(c)(3) and 2487(c) of this title."

2006—Pub. L. 109–163 designated existing provisions as subsec. (a), inserted heading, substituted "to destinations outside the continental United States without relying on the Air Mobility Command, the Military Sealift Command," for "by sea without relying on the Military Sealift Command" and "contracts for sea-borne transportation" for "transportation contracts", and added subsec. (b).
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsAn Analysis and Procedure for Determining Space Environmental Sink Temperatures With Selected Computational ResultsThe purpose of this report was to analyze the heat-transfer problem posed by the determination of spacecraft temperatures and to incorporate the theoretically derived relationships in the computational code TSCALC. The basis for the code was a theoretical analysis of the thermal radiative equilibrium in space, particularly in the Solar System. Beginning with the solar luminosity, the code takes into account these key variables: (1) the spacecraft-to-Sun distance expressed in astronomical units (AU), where 1 AU represents the average Sun-to-Earth distance of 149.6 million km; (2) the angle (arc degrees) at which solar radiation is incident upon a spacecraft surface (ILUMANG); (3) the spacecraft surface temperature (a radiator or photovoltaic array) in kelvin, the surface absorptivity-to-emissivity ratio alpha/epsilon with respect to the solar radiation and (alpha/epsilon)(sub 2) with respect to planetary radiation; and (4) the surface view factor to space F. Outputs from the code have been used to determine environmental temperatures in various Earth orbits. The code was also utilized as a subprogram in the design of power system radiators for deep-space probes.Document ID20010014168Acquisition SourceGlenn Research CenterDocument TypePreprint (Draft being sent to journal)AuthorsJuhasz, Albert J.*(NASA Glenn Research Center Cleveland, OH United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 7, 2013Publication DateJanuary 1, 2001Subject CategorySpacecraft Design, Testing And PerformanceReport/Patent NumberE-12288-2NASA/TM-2001-210063NAS 1.15:210063Meeting InformationMeeting: Environmental SystemsLocation: ToulouseCountry: FranceStart Date: July 11, 2000End Date: July 14, 2000Sponsors:Society of Automotive Engineers, Inc.Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 632-6A-1KDistribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType20010014168.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
### §8293. Distinguished-service medal

The President may award a distinguished-service medal of appropriate design and a ribbon, together with a rosette or other device to be worn in place thereof, to any person who, while serving in any capacity with the Navy or the Marine Corps, distinguishes himself by exceptionally meritorious service to the United States in a duty of great responsibility.

(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 389, §6243; renumbered §8293, Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, §807(b)(13), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1836.)

| Revised section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 6243 | 34 U.S.C. 355. | Feb. 4, 1919, ch. 14, §2, 40 Stat. 1056; renumbered §3 and amended Aug. 7, 1942, ch. 551, §1, 56 Stat. 743. |

The word "award" is substituted for the word "present" to cover the determination of the recipient as well as the actual presenting of the decoration. The words "but not in the name of Congress" are omitted as surplusage, since a decoration is presented in the name of Congress only if Congress so directs. The words "Navy or the Marine Corps" are substituted for the words "Navy of the United States" because the provision is interpreted as authorizing the award of the medal to persons serving with the Marine Corps as well as with the Navy. The words "since the sixth day of April 1917 has distinguished" are omitted as executed. The words "United States" are substituted for the word "Government" for uniformity.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 8293, act Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 509, provided that no person in civil life be originally appointed as a chaplain in Regular Air Force unless he has passed an examination prescribed by President as to his moral, mental, and physical qualifications, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 96–513, title II, §204, Dec. 12, 1980, 94 Stat. 2880, effective Sept. 15, 1981. See section 532 of this title.

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–232 renumbered section 6243 of this title as this section.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2018 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 115–232 effective Feb. 1, 2019, with provision for the coordination of amendments and special rule for certain redesignations, see section 800 of Pub. L. 115–232, set out as a note preceding section 3001 of this title.
#### Patrick Dunn, Respondent, v. New York City Railway Company, Appellant.

.— Judgment and order reversed and new trial granted, costs to abide the event, unless within twenty days plaintiff stipulate to reduce recovery of damages to the sum of $2,500, in which event the judgment as modified is affirmed, with costs. Noopinion. Jenks, Gaynor, Rich and Miller,-JJ., concurred; Hooker, J., dissented. .
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm







To the Board of Directors
National Tax Search, LLC



We have examined National Tax Search, LLC’s (the “Company”)
compliance with the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB Servicing Criteria, set forth in Item 1122(d) of the
Security and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB for the National Tax Search TaxQ system (the “Platform”) as
of and for the year ended December 31, 2016. The Company has determined that only certain servicing criteria, 1122(d)(l)(ii), 1122(d)1(iv),
1122(d)2(ii), 1122(d)2(v), 1122(d)2(vi), 1122(d)(4)(xi), and 1122(d)(4)(xii), are applicable to the activities performed by it
with respect to the Platform covered by this report. The Company has determined that the remaining servicing criteria set forth
in Item 1122(d) of the SEC Regulation AB are not applicable to the activities performed by it with respect to the Platform covered
by this report.



Management is responsible for the Company's compliance with
those servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion about the Company's compliance
with the servicing criteria based on our examination. Our examination was conducted in accordance with standards of the Public
Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's
compliance with the applicable servicing criteria and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances.
Our examination included a selection of a sample of transactions and compliance activities related to the Platform during the examination
period and determining whether the Company processed those transactions and performed those activities in compliance with the servicing
criteria. Our testing of selected transactions and compliance activities was limited to calculations, reports, and activities performed
by the Company during the period covered by this report. Our procedures did not include determining whether errors may have occurred
prior to our tests that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered
by this report for the selected transactions or any other transactions. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis
for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria.



In our opinion, management’s assertion that the Company
complied with the aforementioned servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2016 for the Platform is fairly stated
in all material respects.









Chicago, IL
January 27, 2017
OMI CORPORATION                                                     EXHIBIT 99.2

Form 10-Q

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of OMI Corporation (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Kathleen C.
Haines, Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     3)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     4)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

DATE: NOVEMBER 14, 2002          BY: /s/ KATHLEEN C. HAINES
-----------------------              ----------------------
                                     KATHLEEN C. HAINES
                                     SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT,
                                     CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                     AND TREASURER
#### Ellen E. Warner, Appellant, v. Franklin S. Holmes, Respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. Ho opinion". Woodward, Jenks, Hooker, Gaynor and Rich; JJ., concurred.
#### Marion Malleable Iron Works *v.*Meredith.

[No. 12,051.

Filed December 3, 1924.]

From Industrial Board of Indiana

Proceedings under the Workmen’s Compensation Act by Charles Meredith against the Marion Malleable Iron Works, employer. From an award for claimant, the defendant appeals.

*Reversed.*

*Joseph W. Hutchinson,*for appellant.

Nichols, J.

Reversed on authority of *Marion Malleable Iron Works*v. *Baldwin*(1924), *ante*206, 145 N. E. 559.
Document

EXHIBIT 32.1
CERTIFICATIONS OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
(18 U.S.C. § 1350)
Each of the undersigned officers of Modiv Inc. (the “Company”) hereby certifies, for purposes of Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge:
(i)the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended September 30, 2021 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and
(ii)the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
									
	 	/s/ AARON S. HALFACRE
	 	Name:	Aaron S. Halfacre
	 	Title:	Chief Executive Officer
	 	 	(Principal Executive Officer)
			
	 	/s/ RAYMOND J. PACINI
	 	Name:	Raymond J. Pacini
	Date: November 12, 2021
	Title:	Chief Financial Officer
			(Principal Financial Officer)


The foregoing certification is being furnished with the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2021 pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350. It is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and it is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing, except to the extent the Company specifically incorporates this certification by reference.
#### BEVERLY L. GRIMM *v.*ROBERT L. GRIMM

The Supreme Court docket number is SC 17213.

Decided June 16, 2004

*Norman A. Roberts II,*in support of the cross petition.

*John Wayne Fox*and *Patricia M. Gang,*in opposition.

The plaintiffs cross petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 82 Conn. App. 41 (AC 23901), is granted, limited to the following issue:

> “Did the Appellate Court improperly reverse the trial court’s award of counsel fees?”
### §3375. Undefinitized contractual actions: time limit

No undefinitized contractual action may extend beyond 90 days without a written determination by the Secretary of the military department concerned, the head of the Defense Agency concerned, the commander of the combatant command concerned, or the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment (as applicable) that it is in the best interests of the military department, the Defense Agency, the combatant command, or the Department of Defense, respectively, to continue the action.

(Added and amended Pub. L. 116–283, div. A, title XVIII, §1819(a), (f), Jan. 1, 2021, 134 Stat. 4189, 4190.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

The text of subsec. (g) of section 2326 of this title, which was transferred to this section and amended by Pub. L. 116–283, §1819(f), was based on Pub. L. 114–328, div. A, title VIII, §811(3), Dec. 23, 2016, 130 Stat. 2268; Pub. L. 115–91, div. A, title VIII, §815(a)(1), Dec. 12, 2017, 131 Stat. 1462; Pub. L. 116–92, div. A, title IX, §902(50), Dec. 20, 2019, 133 Stat. 1548.

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 3375, added Pub. L. 85–861, §1(80)(E), Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1475, related to transfer or discharge of reserve generals ceasing to occupy commensurate positions, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 103–337, div. A, title XVI, §§1629(a)(1), 1691(b)(1), Oct. 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 2963, 3026, effective Oct. 1, 1996. See section 14314(a) of this title.

#### Amendments

2021—Pub. L. 116–283, §1819(f), transferred subsec. (g) of section 2326 of this title to this section and struck out subsec. (g) designation and heading "Time Limit" at beginning.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section and amendment by Pub. L. 116–283 effective Jan. 1, 2022, with additional provisions for delayed implementation and applicability of existing law, see section 1801(d) of Pub. L. 116–283, set out as an Effective Date of 2021 Amendment note preceding section 3001 of this title.
#### § 15.203 What information must Tribes provide BIA to complete the probate file?

Tribes must provide any information that we require or request to complete the probate file. This information may include enrollment and family history data or property title documents that pertain to any pending probate matter, and a copy of Tribal probate orders where they exist.

[76 FR 7505, Feb. 10, 2011]
#### KAHIWA HEE CHUNG, Also Known as Keohohiwa, Appellant, v. AH SEE HEE, Executor under the Will of Emalia Haahaa Akiona Hee, Also Known as E. Haahaa, Appellee.

No. 13485.

United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.

Oct. 29, 1954.

Fong, Miho, Choy & Chuck, Honolulu, Hawaii, Fred Okrand, Los Angeles, Cal., for appellant.

N. W. Y. Char, Honolulu, Hawaii, Samuel E. Yee, San Francisco, Cal., for appellee.

Before HEALY, BONE, and CHAMBERS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

This was a suit for the cancellation of a deed on grounds of undue influence and mistake. The complainant in the ease was an aged and infirm Hawaiian woman, and the defendant her daughter. The relief asked was granted by the trial court on ground of mistake, and the Territorial Supreme Court affirmed, holding that there was undue influence as well. 39 Hawaii 364.

We discover in this case no manifest error either in the findings or in the application of governing principles, and the judgment must be affirmed. Cf. Waialua Agricultural Co. v. Christian, 305 U.S. 91, 59 S.Ct. 21, 83 L.Ed. 60; Meyer v. Territory of Hawaii, 9 Cir., 164 F.2d 845; Meyer v. Territory of Hawaii, 9 Cir., 1954, 216 F.2d 277.

Affirmed.
### §7592. Radiograms and telegrams: forwarding charges due connecting commercial facilities

In the operation of telegraph lines, cables, or radio stations, members of the Signal Corps may, in the discretion of the Secretary of the Army, collect forwarding charges due connecting commercial telegraph or radio companies for sending radiograms or telegrams over their lines. Under such regulations as the Secretary may prescribe, they may present a voucher to a disbursing official for payment of the forwarding charge.

(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 257, §4592; Pub. L. 97–258, §2(b)(1)(A), Sept. 13, 1982, 96 Stat. 1052; Pub. L. 104–316, title I, §105(e), Oct. 19, 1996, 110 Stat. 3830; renumbered §7592, Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, §808(d), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1839.)

| Revised section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 4592 | 10:1319. | May 12, 1917, ch. 12 (proviso under "Washington-Alaska Military Cable and Telegraph System"), 40 Stat. 43. |

The words "members of" are inserted for clarity. The words "Government", "and to this end", "as may be", and "amount of such" are omitted as surplusage.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–232 renumbered section 4592 of this title as this section.

1996—Pub. L. 104–316 substituted "of the forwarding" for ", or may file a claim with the General Accounting Office for the forwarding" in second sentence.

1982—Pub. L. 97–258 substituted "official" for "officer".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2018 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 115–232 effective Feb. 1, 2019, with provision for the coordination of amendments and special rule for certain redesignations, see section 800 of Pub. L. 115–232, set out as a note preceding section 3001 of this title.