alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §7780. Acquisition of buildings in District of Columbia

(a) In time of war or when war is imminent, the Secretary of the Army may acquire by lease any building, or part of a building, in the District of Columbia that may be needed for military purposes.

(b) At any time, the Secretary may, for the purposes of the Department of the Army, requisition the use and take possession of any building or space in any building, and its appurtenances, in the District of Columbia, other than—

(1) a dwelling house occupied as such;

(2) a building occupied by any other agency of the United States; or

(3) space in such a dwelling house or building.

The Secretary shall determine, and pay out of funds appropriated for the payment of rent by the Department of the Army, just compensation for that use. If the amount of the compensation is not satisfactory to the person entitled to it, the Secretary shall pay 75 percent of it to that person, and the claimant is entitled to recover by action against the United States an additional amount that, when added to the amount paid by the Secretary, is determined by the court to be just compensation for that use.

(Added Pub. L. 85–861, §1(105)(A), Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1489, §4780; renumbered §7780, Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, §808(d), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1839.)

| Revised section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 4780(a) | 40:37. | July 9, 1918, ch. 143 (3d proviso under "Barracks and Quarters"), 40 Stat. 861. |
| 4780(b) | 40:41. | July 8, 1918, ch. 139 (2d par. under "War Department"), 40 Stat. 826. |

In subsection (a), the words "may acquire by lease" are substituted for the words "is authorized, in his discretion, to rent or lease". The word "needed" is substituted for the word "required".

In subsection (b), the words "At any time" are inserted for clarity. The word "may" is substituted for the words "is authorized". The word "agency" is substituted for the word "branch". Clause (3) is inserted for clarity. The word "determine" is substituted for the word "ascertain". The words "out of funds appropriated for the payment of rent by" are substituted for the words "within the limits of the appropriations for rent made by any act making appropriations for". The word "is" is substituted for the word "be". The words "so ascertained" and "in the manner provided by sections 41(20) and 250 of Title 28" are omitted as surplusage, since those sections were repealed in 1948 and replaced by sections 1346, 1491, 1496, 1501, 1503, 2401, 2402, and 2501 of that title.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–232 renumbered section 4780 of this title as this section.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2018 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 115–232 effective Feb. 1, 2019, with provision for the coordination of amendments and special rule for certain redesignations, see section 800 of Pub. L. 115–232, set out as a note preceding section 3001 of this title.
IV

House Calendar No. 148

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 356

[Report No. 106–442]

Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with respect to

consideration of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on Rules.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

NOVEMBER 3, 1999

Mr. DIAZ-BALART, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be

printed

RESOLUTION

Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with

respect to consideration of certain resolutions reported

from the Committee on Rules.

1 Resolved, That the requirement of clause 6(a) of rule

2 XIII for a two-thirds vote to consider a report from the

3 Committee on Rules on the same day it is presented to

4 the House is waived with respect to any resolution re5 ported on or before the legislative day of November 10,

6 1999, providing for consideration or disposition of any of

7 the following measures:
2

HRES 356 RH

1 (1) A bill or joint resolution making continuing

2 appropriations for the fiscal year 2000, any amend3 ment thereto, any conference report thereon, or any

4 amendment reported in disagreement from a con5 ference thereon.

6 (2) A bill or joint resolution making general ap7 propriations for the fiscal year ending September 30,

8 2000, any amendment thereto, any conference report

9 thereon, or any amendment reported in disagree10 ment from a conference report thereon.

House Calendar No. 148

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 356

[Report No. 106–442]

RESOLUTION

Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII

with respect to consideration of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on Rules.

NOVEMBER 3, 1999

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be

printed
###### Editorial Note on Part 23

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 23 appear at 79 FR 27190, May 13, 2014.

#### § 23.142 How does the Paperwork Reduction Act affect this subpart?

The collections of information contained in this part have been approved by the Office of Management and Budget under 44 U.S.C. 3501 *et seq.* and assigned OMB Control Number 1076-0186. Response is required to obtain a benefit. A Federal agency may not conduct or sponsor, and you are not required to respond to, a collection of information unless the form or regulation requesting the information displays a currently valid OMB Control Number. Send comments regarding this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing the burden, to the Information Collection Clearance Officer—Indian Affairs, 1849 C Street NW., Washington, DC 20240.
IV

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 35

Condemning the racism and bigotry espoused by the Council of Conservative

Citizens.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 2, 1999

Mr. WEXLER (for himself and for Mr. CLYBURN) submitted the following

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

RESOLUTION

Condemning the racism and bigotry espoused by the Council

of Conservative Citizens.

Whereas the population of the United States contains a spectrum of many diverse and rich cultures, races, and religious beliefs that contribute to the vitality and stability

of the Nation;

Whereas the House of Representatives strongly opposes racism, bigotry, and all forms of ethnic and religious intolerance;

Whereas the Council of Conservative Citizens is an outgrowth

of the segregationalist ‘‘White Citizens Council’’, commonly known as the White-Collar Klan, which helped to

enforce segregation in the 1950s and 1960s;
2

•HRES 35 IH

Whereas the Council of Conservative Citizens promotes racism, divisiveness, and intolerance through its newsletter,

World Wide Web site, and public discourse;

Whereas the Council of Conservative Citizens promulgates

dogma that supports white supremacy and anti-Semitism

and maliciously denigrates great American leaders including Abraham Lincoln and Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.;

and

Whereas the Council of Conservative Citizens provides access

to, and opportunities for the promotion of, extremist neoNazi ideology and propaganda that incite hate crimes

and violence: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives—

2 (1) condemns the racism and bigotry espoused

3 by the Council of Conservative Citizens;

4 (2) condemns all manifestations and expres5 sions of racism, bigotry, and religious intolerance

6 wherever they occur; and

7 (3) urges all Members of the House of Rep8 resentatives not to support or endorse the Council of

9 Conservative Citizens and its views.

Æ
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 

Home : Media : Speeches / Testimony

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# The United States-Indonesia Bilateral Security Partnership

By ADM Harry HarrisU.S. Pacific Command

**Adm. Harry Harris**

**Commander, U.S. Pacific Command**

**The United States-Indonesia Bilateral Security Partnership**

**U.S. Indonesia Society & American Chamber of Commerce - Financial Hall  **

Jakarta, Indonesia

August 7, 2017

*As Delivered*

******
*(Introduced by Mr. Theo Sambuaga, Co-Chair USINDO)*

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT
§ 26.10 When will I find out if I have been selected for Job Placement and Training assistance? ( a ) Your servicing office will notify you in writing within 30 calendar days once it receives a completed job training application request; or
( b ) Your servicing office will notify you within 5 business days once it has received a completed Job Placement application and written job offer.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          65,636
<SECURITIES>                                     2,506
<RECEIVABLES>                                   18,331
<ALLOWANCES>                                       638
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                98,607
<PP&E>                                          23,501
<DEPRECIATION>                                   9,489
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 121,587
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           18,350
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                     101,511
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   121,587
<SALES>                                         59,908
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                59,908
<CGS>                                            4,247
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   63,585
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (4,483)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (124)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (4,359)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (4,359)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.08)


</TABLE>
# C_2006154EN.01001703.xml

| 1.7.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 154/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.7.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 154/17

---

Action brought on 13 April 2006 — Oakley v OHIM

(Case T-116/06)

(2006/C 154/46)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Applicant: Oakley, Inc. (Foothill Ranch, USA) (represented by: Michaela Huth-Dierig, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Venticinque Ltd (Hailsham, United Kingdom)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

| — | The decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonization in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of January 17, 2006 in appeal R 682/2004-1 to be annulled. |
| --- | --- |

—

The decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonization in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of January 17, 2006 in appeal R 682/2004-1 to be annulled.

| — | The defendant to be ordered to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

The defendant to be ordered to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Registered Community trade mark subject of the application for a declaration of invalidity: The word mark ‘O STORE’ for services in class 35 — Community trade mark No 2 074 599

Registered Community trade mark subject of the application for a declaration of invalidity:

Proprietor of the Community trade mark: The applicant

Proprietor of the Community trade mark:

Party requesting the declaration of invalidity of the Community trade mark: Venticinque Limited

Party requesting the declaration of invalidity of the Community trade mark:

Trade mark right of the party requesting the declaration of invalidity: The earlier national word mark ‘THE O STORE’ for goods and services in classes 18 and 25

Trade mark right of the party requesting the declaration of invalidity:

Decision of the Cancellation Division: Partial declaration of invalidity of the Community trade mark

Decision of the Cancellation Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissal of both the applicant's and Venticinque Ltd's appeal

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Council Regulation No 40/94 as the goods and services are absolutely dissimilar and there is no likelihood of confusion between the conflicting trade marks since the distinctive character of the earlier mark ‘THE O STORE’ is very limited. Furthermore, proof has not been provided that ‘THE O STORE’ is in any way known or well established in the French market.

Pleas in law:

---
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.2

                          CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
                                 SECTION 302 OF
                         THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Edward L. Pierce, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of BindView Development
Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

      (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

      (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

      (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

      (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

      (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: May 14, 2004

/s/ EDWARD L. PIERCE
-------------------------
Edward L. Pierce
Director, Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS

ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Global Crossing Limited (the registrant) on Form
10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the report), I, John J. Legere, Chief Executive Officer, of the registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §
1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) The report fully
complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information
contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant.

Date: August 9, 2006



|                       
|-----------------------
|/S/ JOHN J. LEGERE     
|John J. Legere         
|Chief Executive Officer
From: Dennis Murr [mailto:DMurr@barr.com] 

Sent: Saturday, October 13, 2012 1:01 PM

To: Wickman, Trent R -FS

Subject: Pelletizing Furnaces - Straight Grate Design

Trent,

Attached are papers on Straight Grate designs. The Hibbing Taconite goes into a lot of detail  with the

furnace section starting at bottom of page 16 and again on page 19.

Most straight grate furnaces have multiple burners along both sides for fuel input. The furnaces at both

Hibbing Taconite and Minorca have only two big combustion chamber on each side for fuel input. The

combustion chambers were initially a design as a way to burner coal as a  fuel source. This design did not

prove out so both Hibbing Taconite and Minorca burn Natural Gas.

Dennis Murr

BS Metallurgical Engineering

Hibbing office: 218.262.8627

cell: 763.213.9698

dmurr@barr.com

www.barr.com

Hibbing Hibbing Tac Staight Staight Grate.pd Grate.pdf Straight Straight Grate Furnace-1.pd Furnace-1.pdf Straight Straight Grate Furnace Furnace - 2.pdf
# C_2006178EN.01001202.xml

| 29.7.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 178/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.7.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 178/12

---

Order of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 30 May 2006 — (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation, Belgium) — Criminal proceedings against Sébastien Victor Leroy

(Case C-435/04) (1)

1

(First subparagraph of Article 104(3) of the Rules of Procedure - Vehicle leasing - Prohibition on using in a Member State a vehicle belonging to a leasing company established in another Member State and registered in that State - Permanent use on the territory of the first Member State)

(2006/C 178/20)

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Cour de cassation

Criminal proceedings against

Sébastien Victor Leroy

Action

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Cour de cassation, Belgium — Interpretation of Articles 49 to 55 of the EC Treaty with regard to national legislation prohibiting, on pain of criminal penalties, a person who resides and works in the national territory from using a vehicle which belongs to a leasing company established in another Member State and registered in that State

Operative part of the judgment

Articles 49 EC to 55 EC do not preclude the domestic legislation of a Member State, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, from prohibiting a person who resides and works in that State from using, in that State, a vehicle which he has rented from a leasing company established in another Member State, when that vehicle has not been registered in the first State and it is intended that it should be used there essentially on a permanent basis or is, in fact, used in that manner.

---

(1)  OJ C 300, 4.12.2004.

1

---