alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 35.1

Servicer Compliance Statement of AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc.

This Annual
Statement as to Compliance is delivered to you pursuant to Section 4.10 (a) of the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of February 2, 2012 (the Agreement) and Item 1123 of Regulation AB, executed in connection with
the formation of AmeriCredit Automobile Receivables Trust 2012-1 (the Trust), the issuance of the Notes by the Trust and the closing of the transactions and the execution and delivery of the various documents by General Motors Financial
Company, Inc. (f/k/a AmeriCredit Corp.), AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc. (the Servicer) and AFS SenSub Corp. in connection therewith. The capitalized terms used herein shall have the same meanings as in the Agreement.

The undersigned certifies that I am the Executive Vice President, Accounting Corporate Controller of the Servicer. I further certify as
follows:



| | 1. | I have conducted, or caused to be conducted under my supervision, a review of the Servicer during the preceding period from February 2, 2012 through
December 31, 2012, and its performance under the Agreement.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, following such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement throughout such period, and, to the best of my
knowledge, there has been no default in the fulfillment of any such obligation.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc.



|    |  |                                                                         |  |  |  |                      
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------- |  |  |  | ---------------------
|By: |  | /s/ Connie Coffey                                                       |  |  |  | Dated: March 26, 2013
|    |  | Connie Coffey Executive Vice
President, Accounting Corporate Controller |  |  |  |
# C_2006224EN.01003101.xml

| 16.9.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 224/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.9.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 224/31

---

Action brought on 28 July 2006 — Commission of the European Communities v Kingdom of Sweden

(Case C-333/06)

(2006/C 224/58)

Language of the case: Swedish

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: J.R. Vidal Puig and K. Simonsson, acting as Agent)

Applicant:

Defendant: Kingdom of Sweden

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | Declare that, by failing to lay down the sanctions for infringements of the provisions of Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004 establishing common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delays of flights, and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 295/91 (1), the Kingdom of Sweden has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 16 of the directive; |
| --- | --- |

—

Declare that, by failing to lay down the sanctions for infringements of the provisions of Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004 establishing common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delays of flights, and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 295/91 (1), the Kingdom of Sweden has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 16 of the directive;

1

| — | order the Kingdom of Sweden to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Kingdom of Sweden to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Article 16(3) of Regulation No 261/2004 requires the Member States to lay down effective, proportionate and dissuasive sanctions for infringements of the provisions of the regulation.

According to the information available to the Commission, the Kingdom of Sweden — by failing to lay down sanctions for infringements of the provisions of Article 14 of the regulation and nearly one and a half years after its entry into force — has not yet introduced a complete system of sanctions for infringements of the regulation.

---

(1)  OJ L 46, 17.2.2004, p. 1.

1

---
#### § 30.125 What is required for the Bureau to meet its reporting responsibilities?

The Bureau is required to prepare and disseminate widely to the public an annual report card for the BIE-funded school system as a whole, and also report cards for individual BIE-funded schools, consistent with the requirements of section 1111(h) of the Act. The BIE's annual report card will be made available on the internet along with all BIE-funded school report cards.
EX-31 Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d)Certifications.

 

 

I, Helaine M. Kaplan, certifythat:

 

1. I have reviewed thisreport on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form10-K of the COMM 2012-LC4 Mortgage Trust (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");

 

2. Based on my knowledge,the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state amaterial fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge,all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by thisreport is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

 

4. Based on my knowledgeand the servicer compliance statements required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in theExchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreements in all material respects;and

 

5. All of the reports onassessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessmentof compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwisedisclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this reporton Form 10-K.

 

In giving the certificationsabove, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:

 

Wells Fargo Bank, NationalAssociation, as Master Servicer, Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, as Special Servicer, U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee,Park Bridge Lender Services LLC, as Operating Advisor, CoreLogic Commercial Real Estate Services, Inc., as Servicing FunctionParticipant, and National Tax Search, LLC, as Servicing Function Participant.

 

 

 

Dated:March 21, 2018

 

 

/s/Helaine M. Kaplan

 

 

President

(seniorofficer in charge of securitization of the depositor)
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Employers & Practitioners 
-  Interest Rates & Factors 
-  Late or Defaulted Withdrawal Liability 

This page has not been translated. Please go to PBGC.gov's Spanish home page for more information available in Spanish.

Esta página no ha sido traducida. Por favor vaya a la página principal del sitio de español de PBGC para ver información disponible en español.

# Late or Defaulted Withdrawal Liability

March 20, 2024

PBGC’s withdrawal liability regulation (29 CFR 4219) provides that unless rules adopted by the plan provide otherwise, multiemployer plans charge withdrawing employers interest at the rates shown below if their withdrawal liability payments are late or in default. Similarly, such plans credit interest at these rates to employers who overpay their withdrawal liability.

2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999 | 1998 | 1997 | 1996 | 1995 | 1994 | 1993 | 1992 | 1991 | 1990 | 1989 | 1988 | 1987 | 1986 | 1985 | 1984 | 1983 | 1982 | 1981 | 1980

## 2024

 

## 2023

 

## 2022

 

## 2021

 

## 2020

* Rate revised from 4.25% to 3.25% to reflect a change made by the Federal Reserve.

 

## 2019

 

## 2018

 

## 2017

 

## 2016

 

## 2015

 

## 2014

 

## 2013

 

## 2012

 

## 2011

 

## 2010

 

## 2009

 

## 2008

 

## 2007

 

## 2006

 

## 2005

 

## 2004

 

## 2003

 

## 2002

 

## 2001

 

## 2000

 

## 1999

 

## 1998

 

## 1997

 

## 1996

 

## 1995

 

## 1994

 

## 1993

 

## 1992

 

## 1991

 

## 1990

 

## 1989

 

## 1988

 

## 1987

 

## 1986

 

## 1985

 

## 1984

 

## 1983

 

## 1982

 

## 1981

 

## 1980
Exhibit 99.7

---



GRAPHIC

MANAGEMENT'S RESPONSIBILITY FOR FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Sprott
Asset Management LP, the "Manager" of the Sprott Physical Platinum and Palladium Trust (the "Trust") is responsible for the integrity, consistency, objectivity and reliability of
the Financial Statements of the Trust. International Financial Reporting Standards have been applied and management has exercised its judgment and made best estimates where appropriate.

The
Manager's internal controls and supporting procedures maintained provide reasonable assurance that financial records are complete and accurate. These supporting procedures include the oversight of
RBC Investor Services, the Trust's valuation agent.

Management
has assessed the effectiveness of the internal controls over financial reporting as at December 31, 2013 using the framework found in Internal
Control  Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based upon this assessment, management has
concluded that as at December 31, 2013 the Manager's internal controls over financial reporting were effective.

Ernst &
Young LLP, the independent auditors appointed by the Manager of the Trust, have audited the effectiveness of the Trust's internal control over financial reporting as at
December 31, 2013 in addition to auditing the Trust's Financial Statements as of the same date. Their reports, which expressed an unqualified opinion, can be found on pages 2 to 3
of the Financial Statements. Ernst & Young have full and free access to, and meet periodically with, the Manager of the Trust to discuss their audit and matters arising there from, such as,
comments they may have on the fairness of financial reporting and the adequacy of internal controls.

GRAPHIC

Steven
Rostowsky
Chief Financial Officer
March 31, 2014

7

---



QuickLinks
155 So.2d 535

#### J. R. SOUTHALL, Supervisor Alabama Alcoholic Beverage Control Board, et al., v. COPA CLUB, INC., et al.,

1 Div. 64.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

June 27, 1963.

*700Jack Crenshaw, Montgomery, for appellants.

M. A. Marsal, Mobile, for appellees.

COLEMAN, Justice.

This is an appeal from a decree denying a motion to dissolve a temporary injunction. § 757, Title 7, Code 1940.

Appellees obtained an order enjoining the Alabama Alcoholic Beverage Control Board, and others, from revoking a liquor license which had been issued to the corporate appellee.

The motion to dissolve takes the point that the bill of complaint is without equity. On authority of Southall v. Stricos Corporation, ante p. 156, 153 So.2d 234, this point is well taken, and the court erred in denying the motion to dissolve.

Reversed and Remanded.

LIVINGSTON, C. J., and LAWSON and GOODWYN, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.1

                                  CERTIFICATION
                           Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350
                 (Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of American Oil & Gas Inc.
(the "Company") for the year ended January 31, 2015, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Shane
Reeves, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Date: August 31, 2017                   By: /s/ Shane Reeves
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Shane Reeves
                                            Chief Executive Officer

This certification accompanies each Report pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of ss.18
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
§ 1000.170 What is the letter of interest? A letter of interest is the initial indication of interest submitted by the Tribe/Consortium informing the bureau of the Tribe's/Consortium's interest in seeking information for the possible negotiation of one or more bureau programs. For non-BIA bureaus, the program and budget information request should relate to the program and activities identified in the Secretary's section 405(c) list in the Federal Register or a section 403(c) request. A letter of interest should identify the following: ( a ) As specifically as possible, the program a Tribe/Consortium is interested in negotiating under an AFA;
( b ) A preliminary brief explanation of the cultural, historical, or geographic significance to the Tribe/Consortium of the program, if applicable;
( c ) The scope of activity that a Tribe/Consortium is interested in including in an AFA;
( d ) Other information that may assist the bureau in identifying the programs that are included or related to the Tribe's/Consortium's request;
( e ) A request for information that indicates the type and/or description of information that will assist the Tribe/Consortium in pursuing the negotiation process;
( f ) A designated Tribal contact;
( g ) A request for information on any funds that may be available within the bureau or other known possible sources of funding for planning and negotiating an AFA;
( h ) A request for information on any funds available within the bureau or from other sources of funding that the Tribe/Consortium may include in the AFA for planning or performing programs or activities; and
( i ) Any requests for technical assistance to be provided by the bureau in preparing documents of materials that may be required for the Tribe/Consortium in the negotiation process.
### §9329. Computation of retired pay: law applicable

A member of the Air Force or the Space Force retired under this chapter is entitled to retired pay computed under chapter 945 of this title.

(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 554, §8929; renumbered §9329 and amended Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, §§806(b)(13), 809(a), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1833, 1840; Pub. L. 116–283, div. A, title IX, §923(c)(20), Jan. 1, 2021, 134 Stat. 3812.)

| Revised section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 8929 | [No source]. | [No source]. |

The revised section is based on the various retirement provisions in this chapter and is inserted to make explicit the entitlement to retired pay upon retirement.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

Prior sections 9331 to 9336 were renumbered sections 9431 to 9436 of this title, respectively.

A prior section 9337, act Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 562; Pub. L. 87–651, title I, §117, Sept. 7, 1962, 76 Stat. 513, related to United States Air Force Academy chaplain, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 114–328, div. A, title V, §591(a), Dec. 23, 2016, 130 Stat. 2152.

A prior section 9338 was renumbered section 9438 of this title.

#### Amendments

2021—Pub. L. 116–283 inserted "or the Space Force" after "Air Force".

2018—Pub. L. 115–232 renumbered section 8929 of this title as this section and substituted "chapter 945" for "chapter 871".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2018 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 115–232 effective Feb. 1, 2019, with provision for the coordination of amendments and special rule for certain redesignations, see section 800 of Pub. L. 115–232, set out as a note preceding section 3001 of this title.
# C_2014113EN.01003001.xml

| 15.4.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 113/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.4.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 113/30

---

STATE AID

STATE AID

SA.14093 (C76/2002) — Belgium — Charleroi airport

SA.18857 (2012/C) — Sweden — Västerås airport

SA.19880 and SA.32576 (2012/C) — Germany — Niederrhein Weeze airport

SA.21121 (C29/2008) and SA.32833 (2011/C) — Germany — Frankfurt-Hahn airport

SA.21877 (C24/2007), SA.27585 and SA.31149 (2012/C) — Germany — Lübeck airport

SA.22030 (C26/2007) and SA.29404 (2012/C) — Germany — Dortmund airport NEO and NERES

SA.22614 (C53/2007) — France — Pau airport

SA.23098 (C37/2007) — Italy — Alghero airport

SA.24221 (2012/C) — Austria — Klagenfurt airport

SA.26190 (2012/C) — Germany — Saarbrücken airport

SA.26494 (2012/C) — France — La Rochelle airport

SA.26500 (2012/C) — Germany — Altenburg Nobitz airport

SA.26818 (2010/C) — Italy — Stretto airport

SA.27339 (2012/C) — Germany — Zweibrücken airport

SA.30743 (2011/C) — Germany — Financing of infrastructure measures at Leipzig-Halle airport

SA.30931 (2011/C) — Romania — Romanian airports

SA.31662 (2011/C) — Romania — Timisoara airport

SA.33909 (2013/C) — Spain — Girona and Reus airports

SA.33960 (2012/C) — France — Aéroport de Beauvais

SA.33963 (2012/C) — France — Aéroport d’Angoulême

SA.33962 (2012/C) — France — Carcassonne airport

SA.33961 (2012/C) — France — Nîmes airport

SA.33983 (2013/C) — Italy — SGEI at Sardinian airports

Invitation to submit comments pursuant to Article 108(2) of the TFEU

(Text with EEA relevance)

2014/C 113/09

On 31 March 2014, the Commission adopted the EU Guidelines on State aid to Airport and Airlines (1). These guidelines enter into force on 4 April 2014. In particular, according to Section 8.6 of these guidelines the Commission will assess the compatibility of any possible operating State aid measure in the above mentioned pending formal investigations pursuant to the compatibility criteria set out in Section 5 of the same guidelines.

1

In the light of the entry into force of the EU Guidelines on State aid to Airport and Airlines, Member States and interested parties may submit their comments on the measures in respect of which the Commission has initiated the above mentioned pending formal investigations within 20 working days from the date of publication of this notice to:

| European Commission |
| --- |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| State aid Greffe |
| Office: Madou 12/59 |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |
| Fax +32 22961242 |

European Commission

Directorate-General for Competition

State aid Greffe

Office: Madou 12/59

1049 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

Fax +32 22961242

Interested parties comments will be communicated to the Member State concerned in each of the above mentioned pending formal investigation. Confidential treatment of the identity of the interested party submitting the comments may be requested in writing when submitting the comments, stating the reasons for the request.

---

(1)  OJ C 99, 4.4.2014, p. 3.

1

---
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Employers & Practitioners 
-  Legal Resources 
-  Technical Updates 
-  Technical Update 12-1: Effect of MAP-21 On PBGC Premiums 

This page has not been translated. Please go to PBGC.gov's Spanish home page for more information available in Spanish.

Esta página no ha sido traducida. Por favor vaya a la página principal del sitio de español de PBGC para ver información disponible en español.

# Technical Update 12-1:  Effect of MAP-21 on PBGC Premiums

August 28, 2012

This Technical  Update 12-1 provides PBGC guidance on the effect of the Moving Ahead for  Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP-21) on PBGC premiums.  The guidance in this Technical Update  supersedes any inconsistent guidance in PBGC’s 2012 premium instructions and  will be reflected in the 2013 premium instructions.

**Variable-rate  premium; premium funding target**

Effective  beginning in 2012, MAP-21  establishes stabilization rules that limit the volatility of certain discount  rates used for funding purposes by constraining them within a corridor.  MAP‐21 also amends ERISA section 4006(a)(3)(E)  to provide that the stabilization rules do not apply to the discount rates used  to determine the variable-rate premium “notwithstanding any regulations issued  by [PBGC].” Thus the stabilization rules  do not apply to the discount rates used to calculate the standard premium  funding target under ERISA section 4006(a)(3)(E) and § 4006.4(b) of PBGC’s  regulations, or to the alternative premium funding target under section § 4006.5(g) of PBGC’s regulations.

For example, consider a calendar-year plan  with a January 1 valuation date that has elected to use November smoothed segment rates for funding purposes.  The  plan must use the following rates to calculate its premium funding target for  2012:

A plan uses at-risk  retirement and form of payment assumptions to determine its premium funding  target only if the plan is in at-risk status for minimum funding purposes for  the premium payment year.

**Variable-rate premium; assets**

The asset value used to determine the variable-rate premium continues  to be the amount determined under ERISA section 303 for funding purposes, taking  into account the rules about disregarding averaging and certain prior-year  contributions in § 4006.4(c) of PBGC’s regulations (generally, the amount  required to be reported on line 2a of Schedule SB of Form 5500).  This is the case even if contributions made  after the valuation date were discounted for funding purposes using an  effective interest rate that was based on stabilized rates.

**Premium rates**

Effective  beginning in 2013, MAP-21 changes the flat and variable premium rates and puts  a cap on the variable-rate premium.  Each  flat or variable rate is subject to a different inflation adjustment, and the variable-rate  premium cap has its own inflation adjustment.

**PBGC contact**

For questions about this Technical Update 12-1,  please contact Amy Viener of the Policy, Research and Analysis  Department at (202) 229‐4080, ext. 3919, or viener.amy@pbgc.gov.