alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas

January 16, 2020

No. 04

- 19

- 00369

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF N.N.M., A CHILD

From the 365th Judicial District Court, Dimmit County, Texas

Trial Court No. 17

- 01

- 13061

- DCVAJA Honorable Amado J. Abas cal, III, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

This is an accelerated appeal of an order terminating the appellant’s parental rights, which must be disposed of by this Court within 180 days of the date the notice of appeal is filed. T EX

. R. J UD

. A DMIN

. 6.2. The Department of Family and Protective Servi ces has filed a motion for extension of time to file its appellee’s brief. Appellee’s motion is GRANTED. Appellee’s brief is due on February 5, 2020.

Given the time constraints governing the disposition of this appeal, further requests for extensions of time will be disfavored.

_________________________________ Liz a A. Rodriguez , Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 16th day of January, 2020

.

___________________________________ M ichael A. C ruz , Clerk of Court
#### Antonio Carpinone, Appellant, v. Jacob Greenspan and Jennie Greenspan, Respondents.

Judgment of the Municipal Court affirmed, with costs. No *904opinion. Woodward, Jenks and Miller, JJ., concurred; Hooker, J., dissented;' Hirschberg, P. J., not voting.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

January 29, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

132419 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 132419 

 COA: 271923 

Macomb CC: 04-000465-FH 

JIM MITROVICH,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 28, 2006 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

t0122 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

January 29, 2007 

 Clerk
#### City of Terre Haute *v.*Johns.

[No. 12,039.

Filed February 5, 1925.]

*Appeal.—Refusing to give instructions not reversible error when correct result*reached.—When an appellate tribunal is of the opinion that a cause was properly tried on its merits and that a correct result was reached, it will not reverse the judgment for error in refusing to give instructions.

From Sullivan Circuit Court; *Walter F. Wood,*Judge.

Action by Helen J. Johns against the city of Terre Haute. From a judgment for plaintiff, the defendant appeals.

*Affirmed.*

*Miller Davis, Randolph H. Mayes*and *Lindley & Bed-well,*for appellant.

*George W. Wells*and *Charles D. Hunt,*for appellee.

Nichols, J.

Action by appellee against appellant for damages resulting from a personal injury alleged to have been received by appellee because of a defective sidewalk in appellant city.

The only error relied upon is the action of the court in overruling appellant’s motion for a new trial, under which appellant presents error of the court in refusing to give instructions tendered by it and that the damages assessed were excessive. The substantial facts as appear by the evidence are that there was a hole in the sidewalk in a thickly populated part of the city which had been there for nine months or more. There is some variation in the evidence as to the size of this hole, but there was ample evidence that it was as much as four or five inches wide, about seven inches long and five inches deep at one end. It is sufficient to say that it was deep enough so that when appellee stepped into it, she was caused to fall thereby and suffered the injury for which she seeks damages in this case. The evidence further shows that appellee was injured August 30, 1921, at which time she was and had thereto*484fore been in good health and had been theretofore doing her washing and housework. She was a large woman, weighing over 200 pounds. When she stepped into the hole, she fell to the sidewalk, her foot remaining in the hole until removed by persons who came to her rescue. She was so injured that she was confined to her home, and part of the time to her bed, for ten weeks and was thereafter unable to attend to her work up to the time of the trial. During all of the time, she suffered great pain. We deem it unnecessary to specifically describe the injuries which she suffered as appears by the evidence.

While appellant has, as one of its reasons for a new trial, assigned that the evidence was insufficient to sustain the verdict of the jury, and that it was contrary to law, it has not presented these questions in this court. Having carefully examined the evidence as it appears in the briefs, we are satisfied that the cause was properly tried upon its merits and that a correct result was reached. Under such circumstances, this court will not reverse because of error in refusing to give instructions. We may say, however, that we have examined the tendered instructions that were refused and we find no error in their refusal.

Judgment affirmed.
Order entered January 24, 2019

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 18
- 00167
- CV
SARAH GREGORY AND NE W PRIME, INC., Appellant s V. JASWINDER CHOHAN, ET AL AND ALMA J. PE RALES, ET AL, Appellee s

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 5

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC
- 15
- 02925
- E



### O RDER Before the Court is appellants’ January 22, 2019 unopposed motion for an extension of time to file a reply brief. We GRA NT appellants’ motion and ORDER appellants to file their reply brief by February 25 , 2019

.
/s/ BILL WHITEHILL JUSTICE
EXHIBIT 32.1


Certification of the Chief Executive Officer


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002








Scott D. Wollney, Chief Executive Officer of Atlas Financial Holdings Inc. (the "Company"), certifies in his capacity as an officer of the Company that he has reviewed the second amendment to the Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2011 (the “Report”) and that to the best of his knowledge:





1.   the  Report  fully  complies  with  the  requirements  of  Sections  13(a)  or  15(d)  of  the  Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in  all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: June 1, 2012





/s/ Scott D. Wollney


Scott D. Wollney


President, Chief Executive Officer and Director














The purpose of this statement is solely to comply with Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United


States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED AUGUST 30, 2016

NO. 03-15-00405-CV

Darrell J. Harper, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM 201ST DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE, JUSTICES PEMBERTON AND BOURLAND 

AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE PEMBERTON

This is an appeal from the judgment signed by the district court on May 29, 2015. Having 

reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error 

in the district court’s judgment. Therefore, the Court affirms the district court’s judgment. 

Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.
§ 162.356 How will BIA decide whether to approve a sublease of a residential lease? ( a ) We may disapprove a sublease of a residential lease only if at least one of the following is true: ( 1 ) The Indian landowners have not consented, and their consent is required;
( 2 ) The lessee's mortgagees have not consented;
( 3 ) The lessee is in violation of the lease;
( 4 ) The lessee will not remain liable under the lease;
( 5 ) The requirements of this subpart have not been met; or
( 6 ) We find a compelling reason to withhold our approval in order to protect the best interests of the Indian landowners.
( b ) In making the finding required by paragraph (a)(6) of this section, we may consider whether the value of any part of the leased premises not covered by the sublease would be adversely affected.
( c ) We will defer, to the maximum extent possible, to the Indian landowners' determination that the sublease is in their best interest.
( d ) We may not unreasonably withhold approval of a sublease.
# C_2016432EN.01001101.xml

| 23.11.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 432/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.11.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 432/11

---

Corrigendum to authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 TFEU

Cases where the Commission raises no objections

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 141 of 9 May 2014
  )

Official Journal of the European Union C 141 of 9 May 2014

(2016/C 432/08)

On page 3, aid number: SA.36906 (2013/N):

for:

for:

‘until 31.12.2016’,

read:

read:

‘from the date of the Commission decision until 3 years after that decision’.

---
# C_2013357EN.01000201.xml

| 6.12.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 357/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.12.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 357/2

---

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the TFEU

Cases where the Commission raises no objections

(Text with EEA relevance)

2013/C 357/02

| Date of adoption of the decision | 22.10.2013 |
| --- | --- |
| Reference number of State Aid | SA.37371 (13/N) |
| Member State | Germany |
| Region | — | Mixed |
| Title (and/or name of the beneficiary) | Aid for external consultants for SMEs in difficulties (Beratungsleistungen zur Herstellung der Wettbewerbsfähigkeit von KMU) |
| Legal basis | Richtlinie Turn Around Beratung |
| Type of measure | Scheme | — |
| Objective | Restructuring firms in difficulty |
| Form of aid | Direct grant |
| Budget | | Overall budget: EUR 37 000 000 |

Date of adoption of the decision

22.10.2013

Reference number of State Aid

SA.37371 (13/N)

Member State

Germany

Region

—

Mixed

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

Aid for external consultants for SMEs in difficulties (Beratungsleistungen zur Herstellung der Wettbewerbsfähigkeit von KMU)

Legal basis

Richtlinie Turn Around Beratung

Type of measure

Scheme

—

Objective

Restructuring firms in difficulty

Form of aid

Direct grant

Budget

Overall budget: EUR 37 000 000

| | Annual budget: EUR 7 000 000 |
| --- | --- |

Annual budget: EUR 7 000 000

Intensity

75 %

Duration (period)

1.1.2014-31.12.2014

Economic sectors

All economic sectors eligible to receive aid

Name and address of the granting authority

| KfW Bankengruppe |
| --- |
| Charlottenstraße 33-33a |
| 10117 Berlin |
| DEUTSCHLAND |

KfW Bankengruppe

Charlottenstraße 33-33a

10117 Berlin

DEUTSCHLAND

Other information

—

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

http://ec.europa.eu/competition/elojade/isef/index.cfm

---
### Bedrock geology of the Lake Tapps quadrangle, Pierce County, Washington

By: L.M. Gard Jr.

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/pp388B

#### Links

- More information:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**                            (html)
-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf) 
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
#### § 170.607 Can a Tribe use its allocation of TTP funds for contract support costs?

Yes. Contract support costs are an eligible item out of a Tribe's TTP allocation and must be included in a Tribe's project construction budget.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# 7th Fleet Destroyer and Royal Canadian Navy Frigate Transit Taiwan Strait

By Commander, U.S. 7th Fleet Public Affairs

                TAIWAN STRAIT  –              
Arleigh Burke-class guided-missile destroyer USS Rafael Peralta (DDG 115) and Royal Canadian Navy Halifax-class frigate HMCS Ottawa (FFH 341) conducted a routine Taiwan Strait transit November 1 (local time) through waters where high-seas freedoms of navigation and overflight apply in accordance with international law. The ships transited through a corridor in the Strait that is beyond the territorial sea of any coastal State. The transit was unremarkable, unprovocative, and consistent with international law. Rafael Peralta and Ottawa's bilateral transit through the Taiwan Strait demonstrates the commitment of the United States and our allies and partners to a free and open Indo-Pacific. Cooperation like this represents the centerpiece of our approach to a secure and prosperous region where aircraft and ships of all nations may fly, sail and operate anywhere international law allows. 

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT
### §4834. Overseas foreign critical technology monitoring and assessment financial assistance program

(a) Establishment and Purpose of Program.—The Secretary of Defense may establish a foreign critical technology monitoring and assessment program. Under the program, the Secretary may enter into cooperative arrangements with one or more eligible not-for-profit organizations in order to provide financial assistance for the establishment of foreign critical technology monitoring and assessment offices in Europe, Pacific Rim countries, and such other countries as the Secretary considers appropriate.

(b) Eligible Organizations.—Any not-for-profit industrial or professional organization that has economic and scientific interests in research, development, and applications of dual-use critical technologies is eligible to enter into a cooperative arrangement referred to in subsection (a).

(Added Pub. L. 102–190, div. A, title VIII, §821(a), Dec. 5, 1991, 105 Stat. 1431, §2526; renumbered §2518, Pub. L. 102–484, div. D, title XLII, §4228, Oct. 23, 1992, 106 Stat. 2685; renumbered §4834, Pub. L. 116–283, div. A, title XVIII, §1868(b), Jan. 1, 2021, 134 Stat. 4282.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 4834, acts Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 272; Nov. 2, 1966, Pub. L. 89–718, §31, 80 Stat. 1119, required commissioned officers of the Quartermaster Corps to give fidelity bonds, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 92–310, title II, §204(a), June 6, 1972, 86 Stat. 202.

A prior section 4835, act Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 273; Pub. L. 103–160, div. A, title III, §362, Nov. 30, 1993, 107 Stat. 1628, related to actions taken upon reports of surveys and vouchers pertaining to the loss, spoilage, unserviceability, unsuitability, or destruction of or damage to property of the United States under the control of the Department of the Army, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 107–314, div. A, title X, §1006(c)(1), (d), Dec. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 2633, applicable with respect to property affected after the effective date of regulations prescribed pursuant to section 2787 of this title.

A prior section 4836, act Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 273, prohibited unauthorized disposition of individual equipment by enlisted members of the Army, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 110–181, div. A, title III, §375(c)(1)(B), Jan. 28, 2008, 122 Stat. 83.

Prior sections 4837 to 4840 were renumbered sections 7837 to 7840 of this title, respectively.

#### Amendments

2021—Pub. L. 116–283 renumbered section 2518 of this title as this section.

1992—Pub. L. 102–484 renumbered section 2526 of this title as section 2518.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2021 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 116–283 effective Jan. 1, 2022, with additional provisions for delayed implementation and applicability of existing law, see section 1801(d) of Pub. L. 116–283, set out as a note preceding section 3001 of this title.
#### § 171.115 Can I and other irrigators establish representative organizations?

Yes. You and other irrigators may establish a representative organization under applicable law to represent your interests for the particular irrigation facilities serving you.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

# Nations Share Mine Countermeasures Expertise in Korea

By Chief Mass Communication Specialist Wendy WymanCommander, U.S. Naval Forces Korea Public Affairs

                SEOUL, Republic of Korea  –              

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

pacom

news

articles
§ 171.570 What is the Federal Register and where can I get it? ( a ) The Federal Register is the official daily publication for Rules, Proposed Rules, and Notices of official actions by Federal agencies and organizations, as well as Executive Orders and other Presidential Documents, and is produced by the United States Government Printing Office (GPO).
( b ) You can get publications of the Federal Register: ( 1 ) By going on the World Wide Web at *http://www.gpo.gov*;
( 2 ) By writing to the GPO, Superintendent of Documents, P.O. Box 371954, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15250-7954; or
( 3 ) By calling GPO at (202) 512-1530.
# C_2014164EN.01000401.xml

| 29.5.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 164/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.5.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 164/4

---

Commission communication pursuant to Article 16(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community

Public service obligations in respect of scheduled air services

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2014/C 164/04)

| Member State | Greece |
| --- | --- |
| Concerned route | Athens – Kozani – Kastoria |
| Date of entry into force of the public service obligations | From 1 September 2014 |
| Address where the text and any relevant information and/or documentation related to the public service obligation can be obtained free of charge | Hellenic Civil Aviation Authority |
| Directorate-General for Air Transport |
| Air Transport and International Affairs Division |
| Section II |
| P.O. Box 70360 |
| 16604 Glyfada — Athens |
| GREECE |
| Tel. +30 21 08916149 / 08916121 |
| Fax +30 21 08947132 |
| Internet: www.hcaa.gr |

Member State

Greece

Concerned route

Athens – Kozani – Kastoria

Date of entry into force of the public service obligations

From 1 September 2014

Address where the text and any relevant information and/or documentation related to the public service obligation can be obtained free of charge

Hellenic Civil Aviation Authority

Directorate-General for Air Transport

Air Transport and International Affairs Division

Section II

P.O. Box 70360

16604 Glyfada — Athens

GREECE

Tel. +30 21 08916149 / 08916121

Fax +30 21 08947132

Internet: www.hcaa.gr

---
IV

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 20

Repealing rule XXIII of the Rules of the House of Representatives relating

to the statutory limit on the public debt.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 6, 1999

Mr. SMITH of Michigan (for himself, Mr. METCALF, Mr. SHAYS, Mr. HOEKSTRA, Mr. HERGER, Mr. SHADEGG, Mr. STEARNS, Mr. BARTLETT of

Maryland, and Mr. SCARBOROUGH) submitted the following resolution;

which was referred to the Committee on Rules

RESOLUTION

Repealing rule XXIII of the Rules of the House of Representatives relating to the statutory limit on the public

debt.

1 Resolved, That rule XXIII of the Rules of the House

2 of Representatives is repealed.

Æ