alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 227.29 Fees.

Unless otherwise authorized by the Secretary of the Interior or his authorized representative, each lease, sublease, or assignment shall be accompanied at the time of filing by a fee of $10.

(Sec. 1, 41 Stat. 415, as amended; 25 U.S.C. 413)

[24 FR 7949, Oct. 2, 1959. Redesignated at 47 FR 13327, Mar. 30, 1982]
STEAM ELECTRIC

C B I R E P L AC E M E NT P A G E

EPA

- HQ

- OW

- 20 09

- 0819

DCN:

________________________________________

T H E FO LL OW ING H AS BEE N R E M O V E D BE CAUSE IT

C O N T AINS C O N F ID E N T IAL B USIN E SS IN FO RMA T I O N

(C B I) P E R 4 0 C F R P ART 2

, SU B P ART B

. SE 04 331A0 22
#### § 1000.102 How are savings that result from downsizing allocated?

Funds that are saved as a result of downsizing in BIA are allocated to Tribes/Consortia in the same manner as Tribal shares as provided for in § 1000.98.
### §7440. Quartermaster

The Secretary of the Army shall detail a commissioned officer of the Army as quartermaster for the Corps of Cadets. The quartermaster shall—

(1) buy and issue all supplies for the cadets;

(2) buy and issue all provisions for the mess; and

(3) supervise the mess.

(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 240, §4340; renumbered §7440, Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, §808(c)(1), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1839.)

| Revised section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 4340 | 10:1067. | Aug. 7, 1876, ch. 255 (last par.), 19 Stat. 126. |

The words "buy and issue all provisions for the mess" and "supervise the mess" are substituted for the words "all the duties of purveying and supervision for the mess". The word "commissary" is omitted as obsolete. The words "and all supplies of all kinds and descriptions shall be furnished to the cadets at actual cost, without any commission or advance over said cost" are omitted to reflect Title IV of the National Security Act of 1947, as amended (61 Stat. 495), which authorized the Secretary of Defense to prescribe regulations governing the use and sale of certain inventories at cost, including applicable administrative expenses.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–232 renumbered section 4340 of this title as this section.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2018 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 115–232 effective Feb. 1, 2019, with provision for the coordination of amendments and special rule for certain redesignations, see section 800 of Pub. L. 115–232, set out as a note preceding section 3001 of this title.
Exhibit 35.1

SERVICING COMPLIANCE STATEMENT

In connection with the Annual Report on
Form 10-K of Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2012-1 for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2012 (the Report), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Santander Consumer USA Inc. (the Servicer), does hereby
certify and represent that:



| | 1. | A review of the activities and performance of the Servicer under the Sale and Servicing Agreement, dated as of January 19, 2012, among Santander Drive Auto
Receivables LLC, Santander Consumer USA Inc., Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2012-1 and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (the Agreement) during the period that is the subject of the Report has been made under my
supervision.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the period
that is the subject of the Report.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



SANTANDER CONSUMER USA INC.By:

/s/ Jason KulasName:

Jason KulasTitle:

Chief Financial OfficerDate:

March 29, 2013By:

/s/ Mark McCastlainName:

Mark McCastlainTitle:

Senior Vice President and TreasurerDate:

March 29, 2013
#### § 166.303 Can more than one parcel of Indian land be combined into one permit?

Yes. A permit may include more than one parcel of Indian land. Permits may include tribal land, individually-owned Indian land, or government land, or any combination thereof.
§ 603.5 Notice to Individuals supplying information. ( a ) Each Individual asked to supply information about himself/herself to be added to a System of Records shall be informed by the NCPC of the basis for requesting the information, its potential use, and the consequences, if any, of not supplying the information. Notice to the Individual shall state at a minimum: ( 1 ) The legal authority for NCPC's solicitation of the information and whether disclosure is mandatory or voluntary;
( 2 ) The principal purpose(s) for which the NCPC intends to use the information;
( 3 ) The potential routine uses of the information by the NCPC as published in a Systems of Records Notice; and
( 4 ) The effects upon the individual, if any, of not providing all or any part of the requested Information to the NCPC.
( b ) When NCPC collects information on a standard form, the notice to the Individual shall either be provided on the form, on a tear off sheet attached to the form, or on a separate form, whichever is deemed the most practical by the NCPC.
( c ) NCPC may ask an Individual to acknowledge, in writing, receipt of the notice required by this section.
##### 



Exhibit 32.0
 CERTIFICATION
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
with Respect to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
for the Period Ended March 31, 2008
  1.
    
    The Companys quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2008, (the Form
10-Q) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act); and
 2.
    
    Information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date: May 9, 2008
    /s/ Thomas S. WuThomas S. WuChairman, President and
Chief Executive OfficerDate: May 9, 2008
    /s/ Jonathan H. DowningJonathan H. DowningExecutive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer  -57-
# C_2006190EN.01002702.xml

| 12.8.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 190/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.8.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 190/27

---

Action brought on 19 June 2006 — Fiorucci v OHIM — EDWIN (word mark ‘Elio Fiorucci’)

(Case T-165/06)

(2006/C 190/50)

Language in which the application was lodged: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Elio Fiorucci (represented by: Adriano Vanzetti, Giulio Sironi and Francesco Rossi, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: EDWIN CO LTD

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 6 April 2006 in Case R 238/2005-1 and declare Community trade mark No 000709006 ‘Elio Fiorucci’, filed on 23 December 1997 and registered on 6 April 1999, is invalid or, in the alternative, revoked; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 6 April 2006 in Case R 238/2005-1 and declare Community trade mark No 000709006 ‘Elio Fiorucci’, filed on 23 December 1997 and registered on 6 April 1999, is invalid or, in the alternative, revoked;

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Registered Community trade mark in respect of which a declaration of invalidity has been sought: word mark ‘Elio Fiorucci’ (application for registration No 709.006 for goods in Classes 3, 18 and 25).

Registered Community trade mark in respect of which a declaration of invalidity has been sought:

Proprietor of the Community trade mark: EDWIN CO. LTD.

Proprietor of the Community trade mark:

Applicant for the declaration of invalidity: the applicant.

Applicant for the declaration of invalidity:

Trade mark right of applicant for the declaration: right to the use of his own name.

Trade mark right of applicant for the declaration:

Decision of the Cancellation Division: application for declaration of invalidity granted.

Decision of the Cancellation Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: appeal granted and application for declaration of invalidity rejected.

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Articles 52(2)(a), 12(a) and 50(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 on the Community trade mark in the light of, respectively, Articles 8(3), 21(1)(a), and 26(1)(b) of the Italian Industrial Property Code.

Pleas in law:

---
#### § 170.6 Acronyms.

AASHTO—American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials.

ADR—Alternate dispute resolution

ANCSA—Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act

BIA—Bureau of Indian Affairs, Department of the Interior.

BIADOT—Bureau of Indian Affairs, Indian Services—Division of Transportation—Central Office.

CFR—Code of Federal Regulations.

DOI—Department of the Interior.

DOT—Department of Transportation.

FHWA—Federal Highway Administration, Department of Transportation.

FTA—Federal Transit Administration, Department of Transportation.

ISDEAA—Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act of 1975, Public Law 93-638, as amended.

LRTP—Long-range transportation plan.

MUTCD—Manual of Uniform Traffic Safety Devices

NBTI—National Bridge and Tunnel Inventory.

NEPA—National Environmental Policy Act

NTTFI—National Tribal Transportation Facility Inventory.

PM&O—Program management and oversight.

PS&E—Plans, specifications and estimates

STIP—Statewide Transportation Improvement Program.

TTAC—Tribal Technical Assistance Center

TTIP—Tribal Transportation Improvement Program.

TTP—Tribal Transportation Program.

TTP-S—TTP—Safety

TTPTIP—Tribal Transportation Program Transportation Improvement Program.

U.S.C.—United States Code
§ 2.708 How long do interested parties have to file a response? ( a ) The LBO and any interested party have 10 days after receiving a copy of the statement of reasons to file a response, which must be served on the appellant, the LBO and other interested parties.
( b ) For good cause shown, the reviewing official may allow the appellant to file a reply brief.
### SUBCHAPTER II—[RESERVED]

Sec.
3171.
[Reserved].
3172.
[Reserved].

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

Pub. L. 117–81, div. A, title XVII, §1701(i)(2)(B), Dec. 27, 2021, 135 Stat. 2141, generally amended Pub. L. 116–283, div. A, title XVIII, §1810(d), Jan. 1, 2021, 134 Stat. 4164, which added this analysis, by substituting "[RESERVED]" for "OTHER PROVISIONS RELATING TO OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT" in subchapter II heading and "[Reserved]" for "Contracts for property or services in support of a contingency operation: competition and review" in item 3171 and for "Operational contract support: chain of authority and responsibility within Department of Defense" in item 3172, thereby omitting this analysis.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

This gives notice under the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463) of October 6, 1972, that the Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee, Department of Health and Human Services, has been renewed for a 2-year period through January 19, 2013.

For information, contact Jeffrey Hageman, M.H.S., Executive Secretary, Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee, Department of Health and Human Services, 1600 Clifton Road, NE., Mailstop A35, Atlanta, Georgia 30333, telephone 404/639-4951 or fax 404/639-2647.

                    The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, has been delegated the authority to sign                     **Federal Register**                     notices pertaining to announcements of meetings and other committee management activities, for both the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.                

Dated: February 14, 2011.

Elaine L. Baker,

Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

[FR Doc. 2011-3713 Filed 2-17-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
IV

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 350

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives with respect to private

companies involved in the trafficking of baby body parts for profit.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

NOVEMBER 2, 1999

Mr. TANCREDO (for himself, Mr. SMITH of New Jersey, and Mr. PITTS) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on

Commerce

RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives with

respect to private companies involved in the trafficking

of baby body parts for profit.

Whereas the National Institutes of Health Revitalization Act

of 1993 effectively lifted the ban on federally funded research involving the transplantation of baby body parts,

and such Act made it a Federal felony for any person to

knowingly, for ‘‘valuable consideration,’’ purchase or sell

baby body parts (with a term of imprisonment of up to

10 years and with fines of up to $250,000 in the case

of an individual and $500,000 in the case of an organization);
2

HRES 350 IH

Whereas private companies have sought to meet the demand

by both public and private research facilities by providing

baby body parts;

Whereas the definition of ‘‘valuable consideration’’ under the

National Institutes of Health Revitalization Act of 1993

does not include reasonable payments associated with the

transportation, implantation, processing, preservation,

quality control, or storage of baby body parts; and

Whereas private companies appear to believe that the definition of ‘‘valuable consideration’’ allows them to circumvent Federal law and avoid felony charges with impunity while trafficking in baby body parts for profit: Now,

therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Rep2 resentatives that the Congress should exercise oversight

3 responsibilities and conduct hearings, and take appro4 priate steps if necessary, concerning private companies

5 that are involved in the trafficking of baby body parts for

6 profit.

Æ
*

 This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the

doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. This court

generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order

and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.

** After examining the briefs and the appellate record, this three-judge

panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not be of material

assistance in the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th

Cir. R. 34.1.9. The cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

F I L E D

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

NOV 4 1998

PATRICK FISHER

Clerk

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT

PHILLIP EUGENE GARDNER,

Petitioner - Appellant,

vs.

RON CHAMPION,

Respondent - Appellee.

No. 98-5065

(D.C. No. 97-CV-148-K)

(N.D. Okla.)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

Before PORFILIO, KELLY, and HENRY, Circuit Judges.**

Petitioner-Appellant Phillip Eugene Gardner, an inmate appearing pro se,

appeals from the denial of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant

to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Mr. Gardner’s habeas petition alleges: (1) disproportionate

sentencing and (2) he was denied a direct appeal of his convictions through

ineffective assistance of counsel. Upon recommendation of the magistrate judge,
- 2 -

the district court dismissed the petition without prejudice for failure to exhaust

state remedies. The district court also denied a certificate of appealability.

In reaching its ruling, the district court permitted supplemental briefing on

the issue of futility of available state remedies. The court found that an available

state remedy exists because the state court could hear Mr. Gardner’s claims if he

articulates “sufficient reason” for inadequately having raised his claim previously.

Before Mr. Gardner may proceed on appeal, he must secure a certificate of

appealability from this court. See 28 U.S.C. §2253(c)(1)(A). Raising the same

issues he raised in the district court, petitioner argues that this court should grant

a certificate of appealability because the district court erred by: (1) not liberally

construing his pro se pleadings, (2) finding that further state court litigation

would not be futile, and (3) disposing of his habeas claims on non-exhaustion

grounds without holding an evidentiary hearing. 

Upon consideration of the record and petitioner’s brief, we conclude that

petitioner has failed to make “a substantial showing of the denial of a

constitutional right. See 28 U.S.C. §2253(c)(2). We DENY petitioner’s request

for a certificate of appealability. The appeal is DISMISSED.

Entered for the Court

Paul J. Kelly, Jr.

Circuit Judge
H. Res. 318

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

October 1, 1999.

Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall

be in order to consider the conference report to accompany

the bill (H.R. 2084) making appropriations for the Department of Transportation and related agencies for the fiscal

year ending September 30, 2000, and for other purposes. All

points of order against the conference report and against its

consideration are waived. The conference report shall be considered as read.

Attest:

Clerk.
§ 2.807 What must my Basis of Objection contain? Your Basis of Objection must be in writing and contain: ( a ) A statement that details all of the errors or omissions that you believe exist in the Statement of Performance, with as much explanatory detail as possible;
( b ) A statement describing the corrective action that you believe BTFA should take; and
( c ) All information that you believe relates to the error(s) or omission(s) in the specific Statement of Performance.
§ 166.803 How are trespassers notified of a trespass determination? ( a ) Unless otherwise provided under tribal law, when we have reason to believe that a trespass on Indian agricultural land has occurred, within five business days, we or the authorized tribal representative will provide written notice to the alleged trespasser, the possessor of trespass property, any known lien holder, and beneficial Indian landowner, as appropriate. The written notice will include the following: ( 1 ) The basis for the trespass determination;
( 2 ) A legal description of where the trespass occurred;
( 3 ) A verification of ownership of unauthorized property (*e.g.,* brands in the State Brand Book for cases of livestock trespass, if applicable);
( 4 ) Corrective actions that must be taken;
( 5 ) Time frames for taking the corrective actions;
( 6 ) Potential consequences and penalties for failure to take corrective action; and
( 7 ) A statement that unauthorized livestock or other property may not be removed or disposed of unless authorized by us.
( b ) If we determine that the alleged trespasser or possessor of trespass property is unknown or refuses delivery of the written notice, a public trespass notice will be posted at the tribal community building, U.S. Post Office, and published in the local newspaper nearest to the Indian agricultural lands where the trespass is occurring.
( c ) Trespass notices under this subpart are not subject to appeal under 25 CFR part 2.
#### § 12.32 Do minimum employment standards include a background investigation?

Law enforcement authority is only entrusted to personnel possessing adequate education and/or experience, training, aptitude, and high moral character. All Indian country law enforcement programs receiving Federal funding and/or authority must ensure that all law enforcement officers successfully complete a thorough background investigation no less stringent than required of a Federal officer performing the same duties. The background investigations of applicants and employees must be adjudicated by trained and qualified security professionals. All background investigations must be documented and available for inspection by the Bureau of Indian Affairs.
EXHIBIT 35.1

SERVICER COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATE

PURSUANT TO ITEM 1123 OF REGULATION AB UNDER

THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934



|                                                                                |  |                     
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | --------------------
|Re:   Cabelas Master Credit Card Trust;
Cabelas Credit Card Master Note Trust |  | Date: March 30, 2016

The undersigned, a duly authorized representative of Worlds Foremost Bank (the
Servicer), pursuant to Item 1123 of Regulation AB and Section 3.05(a) of the Second Amended and Restated Pooling and Servicing Agreement, dated as of December 6, 2013, among WFB Funding, LLC, as Transferor,
Worlds Foremost Bank, as Servicer, and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee, as amended, restated, supplemented or otherwise modified, (the Pooling and Servicing Agreement), does hereby certify that:

1. A review of the activities of the Servicer from January 1, 2015 through December 31, 2015 (the Reporting
Period) and of its performance under (a) the Pooling and Servicing Agreement; and (b) the Amended and Restated Master Indenture dated as of December 6, 2013, among Cabelas Credit Card Master Note Trust, the Servicer,
and U.S. Bank National Association, as Indenture Trustee (as amended, restated, supplemented or otherwise modified, the Indenture and together with the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, the Agreements), has been
made under my supervision; and

2. To the best of my knowledge, based on my review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations
under the Agreements in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this
certificate this 30th day of March, 2016.



WORLDS FOREMOST BANK, as ServicerBy

/s/ Kevin J. WertsName:

Kevin J. WertsTitle:

Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer