alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 211.42 Annual rentals and expenditures for development on leases other than oil and gas, and geothermal resources. ( a ) Unless otherwise authorized by the Secretary, a lease for minerals other than oil, gas and geothermal resources shall provide for a yearly development expenditure of not less than $20 per acre. All such leases shall provide for a rental payment of not less than $2.00 for each acre or fraction of an acre payable on or before the first day of each lease year.
( b ) Within twenty (20) days after the lease year, an itemized statement, in duplicate, of the expenditure for development under a lease for minerals other than oil and gas shall be filed with the superintendent or area director. The lessee must certify the statement under oath.
Exhibit 32.2
 
 
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  
 In connection with the Quarterly Report of OMI Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Kathleen C. Haines, Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:
 3.
      The
          Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
        of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and4.
      The
          information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
        respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
 
 
 Date:
      November
        10, 2003
      By:
      /s/Kathleen
        C. HainesKathleen
            C. HainesSenior
            Vice President,Chief
            Financial Officerand
        Treasure
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 A signed original of this statement required by Section 906 has been provided to OMI Corporation and will be retained by OMI Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its Staff upon request.
### §771. Unauthorized wearing prohibited

Except as otherwise provided by law, no person except a member of the Army, Navy, Air Force, Marine Corps, or Space Force, as the case may be, may wear—

(1) the uniform, or a distinctive part of the uniform, of the Army, Navy, Air Force, Marine Corps, or Space Force; or

(2) a uniform any part of which is similar to a distinctive part of the uniform of the Army, Navy, Air Force, Marine Corps, or Space Force.

(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 34; Pub. L. 116–283, div. A, title IX, §924(b)(3)(N), Jan. 1, 2021, 134 Stat. 3821.)

| Revised section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 771 | 10:1393 (1st par., less provisos). | June 3, 1916, ch. 134, §125 (1st par., less provisos), 39 Stat. 216. |

The words "Except as otherwise provided by law" are inserted to give effect to exceptions in other revised sections of this title and to provisions of other laws giving such organizations as the Coast and Geodetic Survey and the Public Health Service permission to wear military uniforms under certain conditions.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2021—Pub. L. 116–283 substituted "Marine Corps, or Space Force" for "or Marine Corps" wherever appearing.
### NU MBE R 1 3 - 0 8 - 0 0 1 7 6 - CR 

## COURT OF A PP EA LS T H I R T E E N T H D I S T R I C T O F T E XAS CORPUS CHRI ST I -E DI NBURG TA M M Y L O U M AS O N , Ap p e l l a n t, v . T H E ST A T E O F T EXA S, A ppel l ee.

O n a p p e a l fro m th e 3 6 th D i s tri c t C o u rt of San Pat r i ci o C ount y , T exas. 

## ME MO RA N D U M OP I N I ON B ef or e C hi ef

Just i ce Val dez and Just i ces Gar z a and B enav i des M em or andum O pi ni on PerC ur i am Pursuantto a pl ea barg ain , app ell ant, Tammy Lou M ason, pl eaded g uil ty to del iv er y of coc ain e in tr ial co urt c ause number S- 08- 3047- CR , app eal ed to thi s C our t as app ellate cause num ber 13 -08-00 1 7 6 -C R. The trial court has certif ication thatthis “is a p le a -b a rg ain case , and the de fend anthas NO rig ht of app eal.” SeeT EX . R. A PP . P. 25.2( a) (2 ).2

On Ap ril 4, 20 08, this Court not if ie d ap pellan t’s coun sel of the trial court’s cer ti ficat ion and ordered c ounse l to: (1 ) re v iew t h e r e cord; ( 2) dete rmi ne w hether a p p e lla n t h a s a righ t t o ap p e a l; an d (3) fo rward to th is Co u rt , b y le tt e r, c o u n se l’s f in d in gs as to w hether

appel lan t has a r ight to appeal , or , al ter nati v ely , adv is e thi s C our t asto the e x is tenc e of any

amended cer

ti ficat ion
. On May 14, 200 8, cou nsel respo nde d an d stat ed th at th e trial court errone ously cer ti fied th at A ppel lan t di d hav e a righ t to appeal , butsu bseq uentl y execut ed a cor re cte d tr ial co urt c erti ficat ion i ndi cat ing thatthi s was a plea barg ain ca se and t hat appel lan t di d nothav e the r ig ht of appea l. The Tex a s Ru le s os Appel lat e Procedu re prov ide thatan a ppeal mustbe dis mis sed if the tr ial co urt’ s c erti ficat ion do e s n o t s how thatthe defendant hasthe ri g ht of appeal
. T EX . R. A PP . P. 2 5.2( d) ; see T EX . R. A PP . P
. 3 7
. 1 , 4 4
. 3 , 4 4
. 4
. Ac c o rd in gl y, thi s a ppeal i s d is mis sed. An y pendi ng moti ons are deni ed as moot.
PERC UR IAM
Do not p ubl is h. T EX . R. A PP . P. 47 .2(b). Me moran dum Opi nio n del ivered and filed thi s t he 5t h day

of June, 2008.
#### § 134.3 Period for payments extended.

Furthermore, in recent legislation dealing with specific projects in the Bureau and also all reclamation projects the policy has been to extend the payment of such charges over a longer period of years.
#### § 115.618 What happens if at the conclusion of the notice and hearing process we decide to encumber your IIM account because of an administrative error which resulted in funds that you do not own being deposited in your account or distributed to you or to a third party on your behalf?

If we decide at the conclusion of the notice and hearing process to encumber your account because of an administrative error which resulted in funds that you do not own being deposited into your IIM account or distributed to you or to a third party on your behalf, we will consult with you or your guardian, as applicable, to determine how the funds will be re-paid.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-2736
DERNECK L. PITTMAN, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus DENNIS HARDEE; ROYCE DAVIS; ELKAY SOUTHERN, INCORPORATED, Defendants - Appellees.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. James C. Fox, District Judge. (CA-97-19-F) Submitted: May 14, 1998 Decided: May 21, 1998 Before WIDENER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Derneck L. Pittman, Appellant Pro Se. John S. Burgin, OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, Raleigh, North Carolina; Tracey Lynne Truesdale, MURPHY, SMITH & POLK, Chicago, Illinois, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order dismissing his employment discrimination action. We have reviewed the record andthe district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Pittman v. Hardee , No. CA-97-19-F (E.D.N.C. Nov. 14, 1997). We dispense withoral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### § 290.13 Under what conditions may an Indian tribe distribute per capita payments?

You may make per capita payments only after the ABO approves your tribal revenue allocation plan.
§ 170.935 How does a direct service Tribe begin the alternative dispute resolution process? ( a ) To begin the ADR process, a direct service Tribe must write to the BIA Regional Director, or the Chief of BIA Division of Transportation. The letter must: ( 1 ) Ask to begin one of the ADR procedures in the Administrative Dispute Resolution Act of 1996, 5 U.S.C. 571-583 (ADR Act); and
( 2 ) Explain the factual and legal basis for the dispute.
( b ) ADR proceedings will be governed by procedures in the ADR Act and the implementing regulations.
# C_2013379EN.01002302.xml

| 28.12.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 379/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.12.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 379/23

---

Notification of the Belgian Government pursuant to Article 10(2) of Directive 2009/72/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (‘Electricity Directive’) concerning common rules for the internal market in electricity regarding the designation of Elia System Operator NV as transmission system operator in Belgium

(2013/C 379/14)

Following the Belgian regulatory authority's final decision of 6 December 2012 regarding the certification of Elia System Operator NV as ownership unbundled transmission system operator (Article 9 of the Electricity Directive), Belgium has notified to the Commission the official approval and designation of this company as a transmission system operator operating in Belgium in accordance with Article 10 of the Electricity Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council.

Any additional information can be obtained from:

| Maarten NOENINCKX |
| --- |
| Directorate-General for Energy |
| Boulevard du Roi Albert II/Koning Albert II-laan 16 |
| 1000 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |
| Τel. +32 22779583 |
| E-mail: Maarten.noeninckx@economie.fgov.be |
| http://economie.fgov.be |

Maarten NOENINCKX

Directorate-General for Energy

Boulevard du Roi Albert II/Koning Albert II-laan 16

1000 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

Τel. +32 22779583

E-mail: Maarten.noeninckx@economie.fgov.be

http://economie.fgov.be

---
###### Editorial Note on Part 224

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 224 appear at 84 FR 69611, Dec. 18, 2019.

#### § 224.65 How may a Tribe assume additional activities under a TERA?

A Tribe may assume additional activities related to the development of the same type of energy resource included in a TERA by negotiating with the Secretary an amendment to the existing TERA to include the additional activities.

[73 FR 12821, Mar. 10, 2008, as amended at 84 FR 69612, Dec. 18, 2019]
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsStructural Sizing of a 25,000-lb Payload, Air-breathing Launch Vehicle for Single-stage-to-orbitIn support of NASA's Air-Breathing Launch Vehicle (ABLV) study, a 25,000-lb payload version of the GTX (formerly Trailblazer) reference vehicle concept was developed. The GTX is a vertical lift-off, reusable, single-stage-to-orbit launch vehicle concept that uses hypersonic air-breathing propulsion in a rocket-based combined-cycle (RBCC) propulsion system to reduce the required propellant fraction. To achieve this goal the vehicle and propulsion system must be well integrated both aerodynamically and structurally to reduce weight. This study demonstrates the volumetric and structural efficiency of a vertical takeoff, horizontal landing, hypersonic vehicle with a circular cross section. A departure from the lifting body concepts, this design philosophy is even extended to the engines, which have semicircular nacelles symmetrically mounted on the vehicle. Material candidates with a potential for lightweight and simplicity have been selected from a set of near term technologies (five to ten years). To achieve the mission trajectory, preliminary weight estimates show the vehicle's gross lift-off weight is 1.26 x 10(exp 6) lb. The structural configuration of the GTX vehicle and its propulsion system are described. The vehicle design benefits are presented, and key technical issues are highlighted.Document ID20010016865Acquisition SourceGlenn Research CenterDocument TypePreprint (Draft being sent to journal)AuthorsRoche, Joseph M.*(NASA Glenn Research Center Cleveland, OH United States)*Kosareo, Daniel N.*(NASA Glenn Research Center Cleveland, OH United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 7, 2013Publication DateJanuary 1, 2001Subject CategorySpace Transportation And SafetyReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.15:210667E-12501-1NASA/TM-2001-210667Meeting InformationMeeting: Propulsion Systems HazardsLocation: Monterey, CACountry: United StatesStart Date: November 13, 2000End Date: November 17, 2000Sponsors:Department of the Navy,Department of the Army,Department of the Air ForceFunding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 708-73-20Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType20010016865.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
### §8729. Re-lease of certain lands: lessee's preferential right

The Secretary, on terms prescribed by him, may re-lease lands in the naval petroleum reserves that were covered by leases made before July 1, 1936, and terminated by law at the expiration of their initial twenty-year periods. If any such land is to be re-leased, the Secretary shall give to the former lessee preferential rights to the new lease.

(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 460, §7429; Pub. L. 94–258, title II, §201(10), Apr. 5, 1976, 90 Stat. 309; renumbered §8729, Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, §807(d)(5), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1836.)

| Revised section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 7429 | 34 U.S.C. 524 (6th par., less proviso). | June 4, 1920, ch. 228 (6th par., less proviso, of amended 3d and 4th provisos), 41 Stat. 813; June 30, 1938, ch. 851, §1, 52 Stat. 1253; June 17, 1944, ch. 262, 58 Stat. 282. |

The source law provided that leases of lands of the United States within the naval petroleum reserves in existence before July 1, 1936, except leases that had become part of an approved unit or cooperative plan and agreement, should terminate at the end of their initial 20-year period, and that the lands covered by these leases could then be re-leased by the Secretary of the Navy. All of the leases covered by this provision have terminated as provided therein. Thus the provision for the termination of the leases is executed and the only remaining effect of the source is to authorize the re-lease of the lands formerly covered by the terminated leases. This section is worded accordingly. Reference to the classes of leases that were excepted from the termination is omitted as unnecessary because these leases were, of course, not terminated. They are not affected, since this section refers only to leases that were "terminated by law". The word "conditions" is omitted as included in the word "terms".

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–232 renumbered section 7429 of this title as this section.

1976—Pub. L. 94–258 struck out "of the Navy" after "Secretary".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2018 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 115–232 effective Feb. 1, 2019, with provision for the coordination of amendments and special rule for certain redesignations, see section 800 of Pub. L. 115–232, set out as a note preceding section 3001 of this title.
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVEOFFICER**

I,Stephen V. Clark, certify that:

1.    I havereviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Bertucci’sCorporation;

2.    Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.    Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

4.    The Registrant’sother certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) [omitted] for the Registrant and have:

a.     designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the Registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

b.     [omitted]

c.     evaluatedthe effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and

d.     disclosedin this report any change in the Registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the Registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theRegistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theRegistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.    TheRegistrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theRegistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the Registrant’s board ofdirectors:

a.     allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the Registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

b.     any fraud,whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 
| Date:May 12, 2006 |   | By:    |   | /s/ Stephen V. Clark                 |   |   |
|------------------------|--------|--------|--------|--------------------------------------|--------|--------|
|                   |   |   |   | Stephen V. Clark                     |   |   |
|                   |   |   |   | Chief Executive Officer and Director |   |   |

 

----
#### § 2.814 How long will the decision-maker have to issue a Decision on my Objection to the Statement of Performance?

The decision-maker will have 30 calendar days from the date of receipt of your Basis of Objection to the Statement of Performance to issue a Decision on your Objection to the Statement of Performance. If your Basis of Objection is not received when you submit your Objection to the Statement of Performance and an extension of time was not asked for and granted, the decision-maker will dismiss your Objection to the Statement of Performance.
(logo) Deloitte

 

 

**Deloitte& Touche LLP**

695Town Center Drive 

CostaMesa, CA 92626 

USA

Tel:+1714 436 7100

Fax:+1 714 436 7200

www.deloitte.com

 

 

**REPORTOF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

 

ToPacific Life Insurance Company:

 

We have examined management's assertion,included in the accompanying Management's ReportonAssessmentof CompliancewithSECRegulationABServicingCriteria,thatPacific Life Insurance Company (the"Company") complied with the relevant servicing criteria set forth inItem 1122 (d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission's Regulation AB for theSecuritized Commercial Mortgage Loans Operating Advisor Platform (the "AdvisorPlatform"), specifically criteria 1122(d)(1)(v), (d)(3)(i)(a-c) and(d)(4)(vii), as of and for the year ended December 31, 2017, which managementhas determined to be applicable to the activities performed by the Company withrespect to the Advisor Platform. Appendix A to management's assertionidentifies the individual asset-backed transactions defined by management asconstituting the Advisor Platform. Management is responsible for the Company'scompliance with the relevant servicing criteria. Our responsibility is toexpress an opinion on management's assertion about the Company's compliancewith the relevant servicing criteria based on ourexamination.

 

Our examinationwas conducted inaccordance withattestationstandardsof thePublicCompanyAccountingOversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a testbasis,evidenceabouttheCompany'scompliance withtheapplicableservicingcriteria,including tests on asample basis ofservicing activities related to the Advisor Platform, determining whether theCompany performed those selected activities in compliance with the relevantservicing criteria duringthespecifiedperiod,andperformingsuchotherproceduresasweconsiderednecessary in the circumstances. Our procedures were limited toselected servicing activities performed by the Company during the periodcovered by this report and, accordingly, such samples may nothaveincludedservicingactivitiesrelatedtoeachspecificasset-backedtransactionincluded in the Advisor Platform.Further, an examination is not designed to detect noncompliance arising fromerrors that may have occurred prior to the period specified above that may haveaffected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company duringthe period covered by this report. We believe that our examination provides areasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legaldetermination on the Company's compliance with the relevant servicingcriteria.

 

In our opinion, management's assertionthat the Company complied with the aforementioned applicableservicingcriteriaasofandfortheyearendedDecember31,2017fortheSecuritized Commercial Mortgage Loans OperatingAdvisor Platform is fairly stated, in all materialrespects.

 

 

/s/Deloitte & Touche LLP

February28, 2018