alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §7225. Rank: warrant officers

Warrant officers rank next below second lieutenants and rank among themselves within each warrant officer grade under regulations to be prescribed by the Secretary of the Army.

(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 205, §3575; renumbered §7225, Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, §808(b)(7), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1838.)

| Revised section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 3575 | 10:593 (less 1st sentence). | Aug. 21, 1941, ch. 384, §4 (less 1st sentence), 55 Stat. 653; May 29, 1954, ch. 249, §19(e), 68 Stat. 167. |

10:593 (2d sentence) is omitted as executed. The words "within each warrant officer grade" are inserted for clarity, since section 745 of this title covers rank between warrant officers in different warrant officer grades.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

Prior sections 7225 to 7228 were renumbered sections 8625 to 8628 of this title, respectively.

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–232 renumbered section 3575 of this title as this section.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2018 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 115–232 effective Feb. 1, 2019, with provision for the coordination of amendments and special rule for certain redesignations, see section 800 of Pub. L. 115–232, set out as a note preceding section 3001 of this title.
# C_2014065EN.01000901.xml

| 5.3.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 65/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.3.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 65/9

---

Commission communication pursuant to Article 16(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community

Amendment of public service obligations in respect of scheduled air services

2014/C 65/06

| Member State | Spain |
| --- | --- |
| Route concerned | Menorca–Madrid |
| Date of entry into force of the public service obligations | 4 July 2012 |
| Date of entry into force of the changes | 30 March 2014 |
| Address where the text and any other information or documentation related to the public service obligations can be obtained | Ministerio de Fomento |
| Dirección General de Aviación Civil |
| Subdirección General de Transporte Aéreo |
| Paseo de la Castellana, 67 |
| 28071 Madrid |
| ESPAÑA |
| Tel. +34 915978454 |
| Fax +34 915978643 |
| E-mail: osp.dgac@fomento.es |

Member State

Spain

Route concerned

Menorca–Madrid

Date of entry into force of the public service obligations

4 July 2012

Date of entry into force of the changes

30 March 2014

Address where the text and any other information or documentation related to the public service obligations can be obtained

Ministerio de Fomento

Dirección General de Aviación Civil

Subdirección General de Transporte Aéreo

Paseo de la Castellana, 67

28071 Madrid

ESPAÑA

Tel. +34 915978454

Fax +34 915978643

E-mail: osp.dgac@fomento.es

The route subject to public service obligations may be operated on the basis of free competition access under the new conditions as from 30 March 2014. If within a period of 15 calendar days following the date of publication of this notice in the Official Journal of the European Union no air carrier submits a programme of services compliant with the public service obligations imposed, access will be restricted to a single air carrier through the corresponding public tender procedure, in accordance with Article 16(9) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008.

Official Journal of the European Union

---
Need to return call by / at/between and . Signature: ___________________________

Project No.: 0172.09.029.041 DISTRIBUTION

Page _1_ of __1_

Project Name: Steam Electric Rulemaking

TELEPHONE CALL RECORD

Outgoing Call

Date: 10/13/2011 Time: 10:30 AM

Company Name: Louisville Gas & Electric Co (Trimble County

 Power Plant)

Contact Name: Mike Winkler

Phone No.: 502-627-2338

Name: TJ Finseth, Eastern Research Group

GENERAL SUBJECT : Trimble County’s FGMC System

TOPICS DISCUSSED AND ACTION TAKEN

I called Mr. Winkler with Louisville Gas & Electric on October 13, 2011 to discuss the flue gas mercury control 

(FGMC) system at Trimble County for Unit 2. Mr. Winkler confirmed that Trimble County Unit 2 began 

operation in October 2010. However, he stated that it was planned to begin operation in Jan/Feb 2010, but they 

had issues with the operation of the boiler and had to do some reconfigurations. Mr. Winkler confirmed that 

Unit 2 operates with a dry ESP for fly ash collection (which has both wet and dry handling capabilities), 

followed by activated carbon injection for mercury removal, and the mercury-impregnated carbon is collected 

in a fabric filter baghouse. The plant has both wet and dry handling capabilities for the carbon from the 

baghouse; however, all the carbon is currently wet sluiced to the zero discharge ash treatment basin because the 

plant is still going through the construction and permitting for the landfill. Mr. Winkler stated that the landfill is 

expected to be ready to received combustion residuals in 2013 or 2014 at the earliest.

Mr. Winkler stated that most of the fly ash (from the dry ESP) for Units 1 and 2 is handled dry because they are 

able to sell the fly ash to a concrete manufacturer. The plant recently signed a contract with a concrete 

manufacturer. The plant is unable to sell the mercury-impregnated carbon; therefore, this waste will need to be 

disposed of in the landfill.

Mr. Winkler stated that the plant had planned to use the overflow from the zero discharge ash treatment basin as 

make-up water to the FGD system, and that the FGD system would transfer its wastewater to the gypsum 

storage pond (which is still under construction) and the overflow from the gypsum storage pond would be 

discharged. However, based on EPA and permit writer comments, the plant revised its plans and now uses river 

water as the source of make-up water for the FGD. The overflow from the zero discharges ash treatment basin is 

only recycled for use as fly and bottom ash sluice water.

At the time of the call, the gypsum storage pond was still under construction; therefore, the plant is sending the 

FGD wastewater to the zero discharge ash treatment basin instead of the gypsum storage pond.
# C_2006154EN.01002802.xml

| 1.7.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 154/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.7.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 154/28

---

Action brought on 2 May 2006 — de Albuquerque v Commission

(Case F-55/06)

(2006/C 154/65)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Augusto de Albuquerque (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: C. Mourato, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of 23 September 2005 of the Director-General of DG INFSO to transfer the applicant in the interest of the service as head of unit INFSO.G.2 ‘Micro and nanosystems’; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of 23 September 2005 of the Director-General of DG INFSO to transfer the applicant in the interest of the service as head of unit INFSO.G.2 ‘Micro and nanosystems’;

| — | annul the appointing authority's express decision of 2 February 2006 giving a negative response to the applicant's complain R/764/05; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the appointing authority's express decision of 2 February 2006 giving a negative response to the applicant's complain R/764/05;

| — | order the Commission of the European Communities to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission of the European Communities to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The applicant, an official of the Commission transferred in the interest of the service to the post of head of unit INFSO.G.2 ‘Micro and nanosystems’, claims that that transfer is contrary to the interest of the service. He relies on a breach of Article 7 of the Staff Regulations and a manifest error of assessment of the concept of ‘interest of the service’, a misuse of powers and a breach of the principle of equal treatment.

---
#### § 142.1 Definitions.

*Area Director* means the Area Director, Juneau Area Office, Bureau of Indian Affairs.

*Bureau* means Bureau of Indian Affairs.

*Department* means Department of the Interior.

*Manager* means Manager of the Seattle Support Center.

*Must* is used in place of shall and indicates a mandatory or imperative act or requirement.

*Indian* means any individual who is a member of an Indian tribe.

*Indian tribe* means an Indian or Alaska Native tribe, band, nation, pueblo, village, or community that the Secretary of the Interior acknowledges to exist as an Indian tribe pursuant to Public Law 103-454, 108 Stat. 4791.

*Alaska Native* means a member of an Alaska Native village or a Native shareholder in a corporation as defined in or established pursuant to the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act, 43 U.S.C. 1601 *et seq.*
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 24 - 0 2 51 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. FRANKIE SAMUEL PRADO,

Defendant and Appellant.

**G RANT**  Pursuant to authority granted under Mont. R. App. P. 26(1), the Appellant is given an extension of time until July 24 , 2024, to prepare, file, and serve the Appellant’s opening brief.

Electronically signed by: Bowen Greenwood Clerk of the Supreme Court June 17 2024

06/17/2024

Case Number: DA 24-0251
Annual Statement
as to Compliance

For the Period of
March 20, 2012 to December 31, 2012





COMM 2012-LC4





In accordance with the requirements detailed
in §10.11 of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement ("Agreement") for the above-mentioned CMBS pool, CWCapital Asset
Management LLC ("CWCAM"), in its capacity as Special Servicer, is providing this Officer's Certificate with respect to
the following:



| | (i) | a review of CWCAM's activities during the period above and of CWCAM's performance under this Agreement has been made under
my supervision; and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | to the best of my knowledge, based on such review, CWCAM has fulfilled all its obligations under this Agreement in all material
respects throughout the period noted above.
| | ---- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Should you have any questions, please do
not hesitate to contact us.







Sincerely,

CWCapital Asset Management LLC





/s/David
B. Iannarone



David B. Iannarone

President











7501
WisconsinAvenue,Suite 500West.
Bethesda, MD20814

www.cwcapital.com
Order entered September 3, 2021

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-21-00163-CV

RICHARD BROCK COMPTON, IVY CREEK INVESTMENTS, LTD., 

MINERAL POINT HOLDING CO., LLC, AND 

KAZOKU INVESTMENTS LTD., Appellants

V.

KELLY MARIE HOGLUND COMPTON, Appellee

On Appeal from the 256th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DF-18-25368

ORDER

Before the Court is appellants’ August 31, 2021 unopposed third motion for 

extension of time to file their brief. We GRANT the motion and ORDER 

appellants to file their brief, a motion to dismiss, or status report no later than 

October 7, 2021.

/s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE
### §8766. Loan or gift of articles to ships' sponsors and donors

The Secretary of the Navy, under regulations prescribed by him and without expense to the United States, may lend or give—

(1) to the sponsor of a vessel the name plate or any small article of negligible or sentimental value from that vessel; and

(2) to any State, group, or organization named in section 8765 of this title any article, material, or equipment, including silver service, given by it.

(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 466, §7546; renumbered §8766 and amended Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, §§807(d)(8), 809(a), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1836, 1840.)

| Revised section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 7546 | 34 U.S.C. 546h (less applicability to 34 U.S.C. 546g). | Aug. 7, 1946, ch. 804, §3 (less applicability to §2), 60 Stat. 898. |

The words "the sponsor" are substituted for the words "any individual who sponsored" for brevity. The word "ship" and the word "person" are omitted as surplusage. The words "the loans or gifts described in this section shall be made" are omitted as unnecessary, and the words "under regulations prescribed by him" are substituted for the words "subject to such rules and regulations as may be prescribed by the Secretary of the Navy" for brevity.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–232, §807(d)(8), renumbered section 7546 of this title as this section.

Par. (2). Pub. L. 115–232, §809(a), substituted "section 8765" for "section 7545".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2018 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 115–232 effective Feb. 1, 2019, with provision for the coordination of amendments and special rule for certain redesignations, see section 800 of Pub. L. 115–232, set out as a note preceding section 3001 of this title.
#### § 214.12 Time of payment of royalties.

Royalties on all minerals produced in any quarter (January-March, April-June, July-September, October-December) shall be paid on or before the 25th day of the month next succeeding, and the remittance shaIl be accompanied by sworn reports covering all operations, whether there has been production or not. Annual advance rentals shall be paid within 10 days after the beginning of the lease year.
IV

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 402

To inform the Senate that a quorum of the House has assembled.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 27, 2000

Mr. ARMEY submitted the following resolution; which was considered and

agreed to

RESOLUTION

To inform the Senate that a quorum of the House has

assembled.

1 Resolved, That the Clerk of the House inform the

2 Senate that a quorum of the House is present and that

3 the House is ready to proceed with business.

Æ
###### Editorial Note on Part 23

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 23 appear at 79 FR 27190, May 13, 2014.

#### § 23.63 Appeals from inaction of official.

A person or persons whose interests are adversely affected, or whose ability to protect such interests is impeded by the failure of an official to act on a request to the official, may make the official's inaction the subject of an appeal under part 2 of this chapter.
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002



In connection with
the Amendment No. 2 on Form 10-K/A to Annual Report of Xenetic Biosciences, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10K for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2015, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
we, the undersigned officers of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of our knowledge:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    |                                                                                                                                  

| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: May 6, 2016



By: /s/ Michael Scott Maguire

Michael Scott Maguire

Chief Executive Officer, President and
Chief Financial Officer
§ 247.19 Can a site be used for commercial enterprises other than fishing enterprises by the tribes? ( a ) You may operate commercial activities during commercial fishing seasons, and subsistence activities, incidental to treaty fishing on the site.
( b ) You may not construct or operate other types of commercial enterprises, such as firework stands.
§ 212.21 Execution of leases. ( a ) The Secretary shall not execute a mineral lease on behalf of an Indian mineral owner, except when such owner is deceased and the heirs to or devisee of the estate have not been determined, or if determined, some or all of them cannot be located. Leases involving such interests may be executed by the Secretary, provided that the mineral interest shall have been offered for sale under the provisions of section 212.20(b) ( 1 ) through ( 6 ) .
( b ) The Secretary may execute leases on behalf of minors and persons who are incompetent by reason of mental incapacity; *Provided,* that there is no parent, guardian, conservator, or other person who has lawful authority to execute a lease on behalf of the minor or person with mental incapacity.
( c ) If an owner is a life tenant, the procedures set forth in 25 CFR part 179 (Life Estates and Future Interests), shall apply.
### §8737. Violations by lessee

(a) If a lessee fails to comply with any provision of this chapter, of his lease, or of regulations issued under section 8736 of this title that are in force on the date of his lease, the lease may be forfeited and cancelled by an appropriate proceeding in the United States district court for the district in which any part of the property is located.

(b) The lease may provide appropriate methods for the settlement of disputes and remedies for breach of specified conditions.

(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 461, §7437; renumbered §8737 and amended Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, §§807(d)(5), 809(a), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1836, 1840.)

| Revised section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 7437 | 34 U.S.C. 524 (11th par., less proviso). | June 4, 1920, ch. 228 (11th par., less proviso, of amended 3d and 4th provisos), 41 Stat. 813; June 30, 1938, ch. 851, §1, 52 Stat. 1254; June 17, 1944, ch. 262, 58 Stat. 281. |

In subsection (a) the words "the district in which any part of the property is located" are substituted for the words "the district in which the property, or some part thereof, is located," for brevity.

In subsection (b) the words "for resort to" and "for" are omitted as surplusage.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–232, §807(d)(5), renumbered section 7437 of this title as this section.

Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 115–232, §809(a), substituted "section 8736" for "section 7436".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2018 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 115–232 effective Feb. 1, 2019, with provision for the coordination of amendments and special rule for certain redesignations, see section 800 of Pub. L. 115–232, set out as a note preceding section 3001 of this title.
### §3844. [Reserved]

(Added Pub. L. 116–283, div. A, title XVIII, §1835(e)(1), Jan. 1, 2021, 134 Stat. 4241; amended Pub. L. 117–81, div. A, title XVII, §1701(i)(7)(B)(i), Dec. 27, 2021, 135 Stat. 2142.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 3844, added Pub. L. 85–861, §1(94), Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1484; amended Pub. L. 86–559, §1(24), June 30, 1960, 74 Stat. 271, related to transfer or discharge of certain reserve major generals and brigadier generals who are 62 years old, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 103–337, div. A, title XVI, §§1629(a)(3), 1691(b)(1), Oct. 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 2963, 3026, effective Oct. 1, 1996. See section 14511 of this title.

#### Amendments

2021—Pub. L. 117–81, §1701(i)(7)(B)(i), amended Pub. L. 116–283, §1835(e)(1), which enacted this section, by adding section 3844 designation and catchline "[Reserved]" and striking out former section 3844 designation and catchline "Contractor business systems".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2021 Amendment

Amendment made to Pub. L. 116–283 by Pub. L. 117–81, resulting in omission of this section, applicable as if included in the enactment of title XVIII of Pub. L. 116–283 as enacted, see section 1701(a)(2) of Pub. L. 117–81, set out in a note preceding section 3001 of this title and Effective Date note below.

#### Effective Date

Section effective Jan. 1, 2022, with additional provisions for delayed implementation and applicability of existing law, see section 1801(d) of Pub. L. 116–283, set out as an Effective Date of 2021 Amendment note preceding section 3001 of this title.
[Cite as State ex rel. Lockhart v. Whitney, 130 Ohio St.3d 95, 2011-Ohio-4896.] 

THE STATE EX REL. LOCKHART, APPELLANT, v. WHITNEY, JUDGE, APPELLEE. 

[Cite as State ex rel. Lockhart v. Whitney, 130 Ohio St.3d 95, 2011-Ohio-4896.] 

Writs sought to compel issuance of new sentencing entry—Sentencing entry 

complied with Crim.R. 32(C)—Court of appeals judgment dismissing 

petition for writs of mandamus and procedendo affirmed. 

(No. 2011-0822—Submitted September 21, 2011—Decided September 28, 2011.) 

APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Delaware County, 

No. 10 CAD 12 0094, 2011-Ohio-2023. 

__________________ 

Per Curiam.

{¶ 1} We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals dismissing the 

petition of appellant, John C. Lockhart Jr., for writs of mandamus and 

procedendo. Lockhart seeks the writs to compel appellee, Delaware County 

Court of Common Pleas Judge W. Duncan Whitney, to issue a sentencing entry in 

Lockhart’s criminal case that complies with Crim.R. 32. Lockhart challenges the 

propriety of Judge Whitney’s December 2009 nunc pro tunc sentencing entry. 

{¶ 2} Lockhart’s claims for extraordinary relief lack merit because the 

sentencing entry fully complied with Crim.R. 32(C) by including the findings of 

the jury upon which his convictions are based, the sentence, the signature of the 

judge, and the time stamp indicating journalization by the clerk of court. See 

State ex rel. Cunningham v. Lindeman, 126 Ohio St.3d 481, 2010-Ohio-4388, 935 

N.E.2d 393, ¶ 1. “Neither procedendo nor mandamus will compel the 

performance of a duty that has already been performed.” State ex rel. Kreps v. 

Christiansen (2000), 88 Ohio St.3d 313, 318, 725 N.E.2d 663; State ex rel. Rose 

v. McGinty, 123 Ohio St.3d 86, 2009-Ohio-4050, 914 N.E.2d 366, ¶ 2. 
SUPREME COURT OF OHIO

2

{¶ 3} Therefore, the court of appeals correctly dismissed Lockhart’s 

petition, and we affirm that judgment. 

Judgment affirmed. 

O’CONNOR, C.J., and PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’DONNELL,

LANZINGER, CUPP, and MCGEE BROWN, JJ., concur. 

__________________ 

 John C. Lockhart Jr., pro se. 

 Carol Hamilton O’Brien, Delaware County Prosecuting Attorney, and 

Aric I. Hochstettler, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee. 

______________________
#### § 2.105 Who will receive notice of decisions that are appealable under this part?

Except as provided in other regulations governing specific types of decisions (see § 2.103), the decision-maker will transmit a copy of all appealable decisions to all known interested parties at the addresses the decision-maker has on file for them.