alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 40 (Tuesday, March 1, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 11314]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-4198]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Art Advisory Panel--Notice of Availability of Report of 2010 
Closed Meetings

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service, Treasury.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. app. I section 10(d), of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act, and 5 U.S.C. section 552b, the Government in 
the Sunshine Act, a report summarizing the closed meeting activities of 
the Art Advisory Panel during 2010 has been prepared. A copy of this 
report has been filed with the Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for 
Management.

DATES: Effective Date: This notice is effective March 1, 2011.

ADDRESSES: The report is available for public inspection and requests 
for copies should be addressed to: Internal Revenue Service, Freedom of 
Information Reading Room, Room 1621, 1111 Constitution Avenue, NW., 
Washington, DC 20224, telephone number (202) 622-5164 (not a toll free 
number). The report is also available at http://www.irs.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joseph Bothwell, AP:TPV:ART, Internal 
Revenue Service/Appeals, 1099 14th Street, NW., Washington, DC 20005, 
telephone (202) 435-5611 (not a toll free telephone number).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: It has determined that this document is not 
a major rule as defined in Executive Order 12291 and that a regulatory 
impact analysis therefore, is not required. Neither does this document 
constitute a rule subject to the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 
Chapter 6).

Douglas Shulman,
Commissioner of Internal Revenue.
[FR Doc. 2011-4198 Filed 2-28-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
H. Res. 425

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

March 1, 2000.

Resolved, That it shall be in order at any time on the

legislative day of Wednesday, March 8, 2000, for the Speaker

to entertain motions to suspend the rules. The Speaker or his

designee shall consult with the Minority Leader or his designee on the designation of any matter for consideration pursuant to this resolution.

Attest:

Clerk.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Tyrone Trinidad, Appellant.

[823 NYS2d *751]*

*Motion for*writ of error coram nobis denied. Present—Kehoe, J.P., Martoche, Green and Pine, JJ.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Employers & Practitioners 
-  Mortality, Retirement and PV Max Guarantee 
-  ERISA Section 4044/4050 Mortality Tables 
-  ERISA Section 4044 Mortality Table For 2018 Valuation Dates 

This page has not been translated. Please go to PBGC.gov's Spanish home page for more information available in Spanish.

Esta página no ha sido traducida. Por favor vaya a la página principal del sitio de español de PBGC para ver información disponible en español.

# ERISA Section 4044 Mortality Table for 2018 Valuation Dates

This mortality table is used to determine the present value of annuities in involuntary terminations and distress terminations of single-employer plans, as discussed in 29 CFR 4044. This mortality table is also available in EXCEL.

The rate tables applicable for other years are accessible from the main ERISA Section 4044/4050 Mortality Tables page.

November 29, 2018

##           Related Information      

Subscribe to Interest Rate Updates
#### § 1000.85 Can a Tribe/Consortium negotiate an AFA with a term that exceeds one year?

Yes, at the option of the Tribe/Consortium, and subject to the availability of Congressional appropriations, a Tribe/Consortium may negotiate an AFA with a term that exceeds one year in accordance with section 105(c)(1) of Title I of Pub. L. 93-638.
§ 169.201 How long may the duration of a right-of-way grant be? ( a ) All rights-of-way granted under this part are limited to the time periods stated in the grant.
( b ) For tribal land, we will defer to the tribe's determination that the right-of-way term is reasonable.
( c ) For individually owned Indian land, we will review the right-of-way duration to ensure that it is reasonable, given the purpose of the right-of-way. We will generally consider a maximum duration of 20 years to be reasonable for the initial term for rights-of-way for oil and gas purposes and a maximum of 50 years, inclusive of the initial term and any renewals, to be reasonable for rights-of-way for all other purposes. We will consider a duration consistent with use to be reasonable for rights-of-way for conservation easements. We will consider durations different from these guidelines if a different duration would benefit the Indian landowners, is required by another Federal agency, or the tribe has negotiated for a different duration and the right-of-way crosses tribal land.
H. Res. 460

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

April 6, 2000.

Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule

XVIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee of the

Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of

the bill (H.R. 1776) to expand homeownership in the United

States. The first reading of the bill shall be dispensed with.

All points of order against consideration of the bill are

waived. General debate shall be confined to the bill and shall

not exceed one hour equally divided and controlled by the

chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on

Banking and Financial Services. After general debate the bill

shall be considered for amendment under the five-minute

rule. It shall be in order to consider as an original bill for

the purpose of amendment under the five-minute rule the

amendment in the nature of a substitute recommended by the

Committee on Banking and Financial Services now printed in

the bill. The committee amendment in the nature of a substitute shall be considered as read. All points of order against
2

•HRES 460 EH

the committee amendment in the nature of a substitute are

waived. No amendment to the committee amendment in the

nature of a substitute shall be in order except those printed

in the report of the Committee on Rules accompanying this

resolution. Each amendment may be offered only in the order

printed in the report, may be offered only by a Member designated in the report, shall be considered as read, shall be debatable for the time specified in the report equally divided

and controlled by the proponent and an opponent, shall not

be subject to amendment, and shall not be subject to a demand for division of the question in the House or in the

Committee of the Whole. All points of order against the

amendments printed in the report are waived. The Chairman

of the Committee of the Whole may: (1) postpone until a time

during further consideration in the Committee of the Whole

a request for a recorded vote on any amendment; and (2) reduce to five minutes the minimum time for electronic voting

on any postponed question that follows another electronic

vote without intervening business, provided that the minimum

time for electronic voting on the first in any series of questions shall be 15 minutes. At the conclusion of consideration

of the bill for amendment the Committee shall rise and report

the bill to the House with such amendments as may have

been adopted. Any Member may demand a separate vote in

the House on any amendment adopted in the Committee of
3

•HRES 460 EH

the Whole to the bill or to the committee amendment in the

nature of a substitute. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill and amendments thereto to final

passage without intervening motion except one motion to recommit with or without instructions.

Attest:

Clerk.
### §3012. Competitive procedures

In this part, the term "competitive procedures" means procedures under which the head of an agency enters into a contract pursuant to full and open competition. Such term also includes—

(1) procurement of architectural or engineering services conducted in accordance with chapter 11 of title 40;

(2) the competitive selection for award of science and technology proposals resulting from a general solicitation and the peer review or scientific review (as appropriate) of such proposals;

(3) the procedures established by the Administrator of General Services for the multiple award schedule program of the General Services Administration if—

(A) participation in the program has been open to all responsible sources; and

(B) orders and contracts under such program result in the lowest overall cost alternative to meet the needs of the United States;

(4) procurements conducted in furtherance of section 15 of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 644) as long as all responsible business concerns that are entitled to submit offers for such procurements are permitted to compete; and

(5) a competitive selection of research proposals resulting from a general solicitation and peer review or scientific review (as appropriate) solicited pursuant to section 9 of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 638).

(Added and amended Pub. L. 116–283, div. A, title XVIII, §1806(b)(1), (3), Jan. 1, 2021, 134 Stat. 4153.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

The text of par. (2) of section 2302 of this title, which was transferred to this section and amended by Pub. L. 116–283, §1806(b)(3), was based on act Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 127; Pub. L. 98–369, div. B, title VII, §2722(a), July 18, 1984, 98 Stat. 1186; Pub. L. 98–577, title V, §504(b)(3), Oct. 30, 1984, 98 Stat. 3087; Pub. L. 99–661, div. A, title XIII, §1343(a)(13), Nov. 14, 1986, 100 Stat. 3993; Pub. L. 100–26, §7(k)(2), Apr. 21, 1987, 101 Stat. 284; Pub. L. 107–217, §3(b)(2), Aug. 21, 2002, 116 Stat. 1295; Pub. L. 115–91, div. A, title II, §221, Dec. 12, 2017, 131 Stat. 1333.

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 3012 was renumbered section 7012 of this title.

Another prior section 3012 was renumbered section 3013 of this title and subsequently repealed.

#### Amendments

2021—Pub. L. 116–283, §1806(b)(3), transferred par. (2) of section 2302 of this title to this section, realigned margin, struck out par. (2) designation at beginning, substituted "In this part, the term" for "The term" in introductory provisions, redesignated subpars. (A) to (E) as pars. (1) to (5), respectively, and, in par. (3), redesignated cls. (i) and (ii) as subpars. (A) and (B), respectively.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section and amendment by Pub. L. 116–283 effective Jan. 1, 2022, with additional provisions for delayed implementation and applicability of existing law, see section 1801(d) of Pub. L. 116–283, set out as an Effective Date of 2021 Amendment note preceding section 3001 of this title.
§ 273.120 Does an education plan need to be approved by the BIE Director? The Secretary will not enter into any contract for the education of Indians unless: ( a ) The contractor has submitted an education plan to the BIE Director; and
( b ) The BIE Director has determined that the education plan contains educational objectives that adequately address the educational needs of the Indian students who are to be beneficiaries of the contract, and that the contract is capable of meeting such objectives.
§ 166.804 What can I do if I receive a trespass notice? If you receive a trespass notice, you will within the time frame specified in the notice: ( a ) Comply with the ordered corrective actions; or
( b ) Contact us in writing to explain why the trespass notice is in error. You may contact us by telephone but any explanation of trespass you wish to provide must be in writing. If we determine that we issued the trespass notice in error, we will withdraw the notice.
§ 273.129 May the BIE Director reimburse a public school district for educating non-resident Indian students? The BIE Director may consider a contract proposal to reimburse a public school district for the full per capita costs of educating Indian students who meet all of the following: ( a ) Are members of recognized Indian Tribes;
( b ) Do not normally reside in the State in which the school district is located; and
( c ) Are residing in Federal boarding facilities for the purpose of attending public schools within the school district.
# C_2006190EN.01003402.xml

| 12.8.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 190/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.8.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 190/34

---

Action brought on 21 April 2006 — Pimlott v Europol

(Case F-52/06)

(2006/C 190/64)

Language of the case: Dutch

Parties

Applicant: Mike Pimlott (Porchester, Hampshire, United Kingdom) (represented by: D.C. Coppens, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Police Office (Europol)

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | Annul Europol's decision of 25 January 2006; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul Europol's decision of 25 January 2006;

| — | Order Europol to renew the applicant's contract for a period of four years, from 1 January 2006 to 31 December 2010; |
| --- | --- |

—

Order Europol to renew the applicant's contract for a period of four years, from 1 January 2006 to 31 December 2010;

| — | Order Europol to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order Europol to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The applicant, after having been first engaged by Europol on 1 January 2000 for a period initially fixed at four years, was employed from 1 January 2002 in a different position within the same bureau, under a new contract, which was to end on 31 December 2005.

In his action, the applicant challenges Europol's decision to renew that contract for two years only. He claims that, from the time he took up his new post under the new contract, Europol should have treated him not as a staff member to whom the authorities of his State of origin had granted unpaid special leave, but as a staff member who was no longer linked to those authorities. The distinction is relevant because, in the first case, the second indent of Article 6 of the Staff Regulations applicable to Europol employees, permitting renewal for a period of two years, is to be applied, while in the second case the third indent of that provision, permitting renewal for a period of four years, is to be applied.

The applicant submits that in 2002 he severed all ties with his original employer in the United Kingdom and that he was persuaded that the latter would amend the staff roll as a result. Even were it to be established that, in fact, the United Kingdom authorities did not remove him from that roll, the applicant claims that he himself should not in any event have to bear the consequences of that negligence.

---
### §2184. Termination of assistance

Assistance under this chapter—

(1) shall be discontinued for any person whose conduct or progress is unsatisfactory under standards consistent with those established under section 3524 of title 38; and

(2) may not be provided for any person for more than 45 months (or the equivalent in other than full-time education or training).

(Added Pub. L. 99–399, title VIII, §806(d)(1), Aug. 27, 1986, 100 Stat. 888; amended Pub. L. 103–337, div. A, title X, §1070(e)(7), Oct. 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 2859.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1994—Par. (1). Pub. L. 103–337 substituted "3524" for "1724".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section applicable with respect to persons whose captive status begins after Jan. 21, 1981, see section 806(d)(3) of Pub. L. 99–399, set out as a note under 2181 of this title.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  About PBGC 
-  Reports Archives 

This page has not been translated. Please go to PBGC.gov's Spanish home page for more information available in Spanish.

Esta página no ha sido traducida. Por favor vaya a la página principal del sitio de español de PBGC para ver información disponible en español.

# Reports Archives

 
                          - 2020 SBREFA Compliance Report  (March 17, 2020)
                          - Smaller Asset Managers Pilot Program   (July 10, 2018)
                          - Risk Transfer Study   (December 9, 2015)
                          - Multiemployer Guarantee Study  (March 11, 2015)
                          - Single-Employer DB Plan Freezes  (May 7, 2013)
                          - Multiemployer Pension Plans – PPA Study  (January 22, 2013)
                          - PBGC's Guarantee Limits—An Update  (September 30, 2008)
                          - Hard-Frozen Defined Benefit Plans  (August 25, 2008)
                          - An Analysis of Frozen Defined Benefit Plans   (December 21, 2005)
                          - Impact of Pension Reform Proposals On Claims Against the Pension Insurance Program, Losses to Participants, and Contributions  (October 26, 2005)
                          - Impact of Administration's Pension Reform Proposal  (April 6, 2005)

## Historical Multiemployer Reports

                          - A Guide to PBGC Recommendations to Congress  (May, 1979)
                          - Recommendations to the Congress for Revising Multiemployer Plan Termination Insurance  (February, 1979)
                          - Multiemployer Study Required by P.L. 95-214  (July 1, 1978)

## Federal Employee Viewpoint Survey

                          - 2020 Federal Employee Viewpoint Survey Summary & Results
                          - 2019 Federal Employee Viewpoint Survey Results
                          - 2019 Federal Employee Viewpoint Survey Agency Management Report
                          - 2018 Federal Employee Viewpoint Survey Results
                          - 2018 Federal Employee Viewpoint Survey Agency Management Report
                          - 2017 Federal Employee Viewpoint Survey Results
                          - 2017 Federal Employee Viewpoint Survey Agency Management Report
                          - 2016 Federal Employee Viewpoint Survey Results
                          - 2016 Federal Employee Viewpoint Survey Agency Management Report

## Congressional Budget Justification

FY 2016 Congressional Budget Justification

FY 2015 Congressional Budget Justification

August 11, 2022

##           Reports      

Annual Performance & Financial Reports

Budget, Performance & Planning

ERISA 4010 Reports

FOIA Annual & Quarterly Reports

Multiemployer 5-Year Reports

Pension Insurance Modeling System (PIMS) Reports

Projections Reports

Reports Archives
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 36 (Wednesday, February 23, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 10038-10039]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-4015]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of General Medical Sciences; Notice of Closed 
Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of General Medical 
Sciences Special Emphasis Panel, PSI Biology Meeting.
    Date: March 11, 2011.
    Time: 1 p.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.

[[Page 10039]]

    Place: National Institutes of Health, Natcher Building, 45 
Center Drive, Room 3AN12B, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Telephone Conference 
Call).
    Contact Person: Margaret J. Weidman, PhD, Scientific Review 
Officer, Office of Scientific Review, National Institute of General 
Medical Sciences, National Institutes of Health, 45 Center Drive, 
Room 3AN18B, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-594-3663, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#e0978589848d818e8d81a08e89878d93ce8e8988ce878f96"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="fe899b979a939f90939fbe909799938dd0909796d0999188">[email protected]</span></a>.

 (Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.375, 
Minority Biomedical Research Support; 93.821, Cell Biology and 
Biophysics Research; 93.859, Pharmacology, Physiology, and 
Biological Chemistry Research; 93.862, Genetics and Developmental 
Biology Research; 93.88, Minority Access to Research Careers; 93.96, 
Special Minority Initiatives, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: February 15, 2011.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2011-4015 Filed 2-22-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
November 19, 2014 

Mr. Kevin Schlemmer, Chief, EAS Division 

Office of Aviation Analysis 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

Washington, DC 20590 

i "'-__ ;, 

Re: Continuation of Alaska Airlines' Essential Air Service at Cordova, Gustavus, 

Petersburg, Wrangell, and Yakutat, Alaska, Docket OST-1998-4899 

Dear Mr. Schlemmer : 

This letter is to express strong support for the selection of Alaska Airlines to continue to 

provide essential air service to Wrangell, Alaska. 

Alaska's service connects Southeast Alaska passengers to one or more major 

communities of interest, with single-plane service to Anchorage, Juneau, Ketchikan or 

Seattle. From these hubs, our community can access the airline's extensive route 

system and benefit from its marketing relationships with other carriers. The passenger 

and cargo aircraft, which Alaska Airlines proposes to continue using on this route, 

provides freight, mail and cargo capacity that other carriers simply cannot provide. 

Further, Alaska Airlines aircraft are equipped with Required Navigation Performance 

Technology, which enables the airline to reliably access the airport during inclement 

weather, thus reducing diversions and cancellations and, in turn, enabling people and 

products to dependably reach the community. 

Simply put, Alaska Airlines' service is critical to the economic well being of our 

community and the Wrangell Chamber of Commerce supports their application to 

provide Essential Air Service to Southeast Alaska. 

Sincerely, 

Cyni Waddington 

Executive Director 

Wrangell Chamber of Commerce 

107 Stikine Ave. 

P.O. Box 49 

Wrangell, AK 99929 

907-87 4-3901 

cyni@wrangellchamber.org
#### § 304.9 Placards; display of regulations.

Every dealer offering for sale silver bearing the Government mark may display in a prominent place a placard setting forth the standards and the regulations in this part, such placard to be furnished by the Indian Arts and Crafts Board.

[Regs., Apr. 2, 1937, as amended Feb. 21, 1938]