alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §8869. Security for costs

The court may require any party to give security for costs at any stage of the cause and upon filing an appeal.

(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 480, §7669; renumbered §8869, Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, §807(d)(9), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1837.)

| Revised section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 7669 | 34 U.S.C. 1148. | R.S. 4638. |

The word "filing" is substituted for the word "claiming".

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–232 renumbered section 7669 of this title as this section.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2018 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 115–232 effective Feb. 1, 2019, with provision for the coordination of amendments and special rule for certain redesignations, see section 800 of Pub. L. 115–232, set out as a note preceding section 3001 of this title.
154 So.2d 673

#### Ex parte Ralph Leon GANDY. In re Ralph Leon GANDY v. STATE of Alabama.

6 Div. 3.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

June 13, 1963.

*318Ralph Leon Gandy, pro se.

Richmond M. Flowers, Atty. Gen., and John C. Tyson, III, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.

COLEMAN, Justice.

This is an original petition, filed in this ■court by a convict, asking for leave to file a petition for writ of error coram nobis "into his trial court.”

The state has filed a motion to strike.' By the state’s motion, we are advised that petitioner did appeal his conviction for robbery to the Court of Appeals where the judgment was affirmed and rehearing denied. Gandy v. State, Ala.App., 150 So.2d 394. Petitioner then applied to the Supreme Court for certiorari to review the decision of the Court of Appeals, but the application for certiorari was dismissed. Gandy v. State, 274 Ala. 518, 150 So.2d 397.

It thus appears that petitioner’s cause has never been in the Supreme Court.

Where the judgment of conviction has been affirmed in the Supreme Court, application is ■ properly made to the Supreme Court for leave to file a petition for writ of error coram nobis in the circuit court. Ex parte Williams, 268 Ala. 535, 108 So.2d 454; Ex parte Seals, 271 Ala. 622, 126 So.2d 474.

Where there has been no appeal to the Supreme Court, and that court has not acquired jurisdiction of the cause by certiorari, or other writ or proceeding, the Supreme Court has no jurisdiction to hear and determine a petition for leave to file a petition for writ of error coram nobis in the circuit court. Smith v. State, 245 Ala. 161, 16 So.2d 315; Ex parte Williams, 255 Ala. 648, 53 So.2d 334.

Because it is not made to appear that the judgment of the circuit court was reviewed in this court on appeal, or otherwise, the original petition for leave filed in this court is without merit and the state’s motion to strike is due to be and is granted. Ex parte Williams, 255 Ala. 648, 53 So.2d 334.

Petition stricken.

LIVINGSTON, C. J., and LAWSON and GOODWIN, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 32.1 – 906 Certification








GENMED HOLDING CORP.





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUNT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Quarterly Report of Genmed Holding Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Erwin R. Bouwens, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss. 1350, as added by ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.         The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.         The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered by the Report.








By: /s/ Erwin R. Bouwens


Erwin R. Bouwens


Chief Executive Officer


and Chairman of the Board





November 22, 2010





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 ("Section 906"), or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Genmed Holding Corp., and will be retained by Genmed Holding Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
### §2872b. Treatment of breach of contract

(a) Response to Material Breach.—In the case of a material breach of contract under this subchapter by a party to the contract, the Secretary concerned shall use the authorities available to the Secretary, including withholding amounts to be paid under the contract, to encourage the party to cure the breach.

(b) Rescinding of Contract.—If a material breach of the contract is not cured in a timely manner, as determined by the Secretary concerned, the Secretary may—

(1) rescind the contract pursuant to the terms of the contract; and

(2) prohibit the offending party from entering into a new contract or undertaking expansions of other existing contracts, or both, with the Secretary under this subchapter.

(Added Pub. L. 116–92, div. B, title XXX, §3033(a), Dec. 20, 2019, 133 Stat. 1936.)
1

Palma, Elizabeth

From: Grier, Gina

Sent: Friday, January 08, 2016 3:03 PM

To: Palma, Elizabeth

Cc: Bhesania, Amy

Subject: EE Outreach 

Attachments: KGLC BOD 010716 Agenda v1.doc; KGLC Roster 1716.jpg

Beth, 

Here’s is the agenda and sign-in sheet from yesterday’s KS Grazing Lands Coalition Meeting. The 

projector wasn’t running, so it was an informal round table discussion on the FR notice, comment 

period extension, and the upcoming burn season. 

Let me know if there’s any other information you need. 

Have a great weekend, 

Gina 

Regards, Gina Grier 

Air and Waste Management Division (AWMD) 

Air Planning and Development Branch (APDB) 

EPA Region 7, Lenexa, Kansas 

 email: grier.gina@epa.gov

VCdefaeafiYU a gghi hig aa jaaLopabcBg[ab 

 ghi aaa ih



  
Kansas Grazing Lands Coalition 

January 7, 2016 

NRCS Conference Center 

747 Duvall 

Salina, KS 

10:00 AM. Coffee & Pastries 

10:15 AM. Call to Order-Bill Edwards, 

 Minutes from October meeting (provided to Board) 

 Review Email Business since 10/14/15 (provided) 

 Treasurer’s report 

 Coordinator’s report (provided) 

 Old Business 

 NFWF Monarch Grant and other Partners’ programs update-Mike Disney 

 Update on 6NCGL-Barth and KGLC presenters 

 Update on 2015 Leopold Award for KS-Barth 

 Update on KDWPT/NGPC State Wildlife Grant-Chris Berens 

 Mentoring Program Update- Cal Adams and Cade Rensink 

 

 New Business 

 Steve Swaffar’s request for help with Soil Health workshop 

 Request for IRC Attendance -Brian Alexander 

 Exceptional Events Rule by EPA-Gina Grier 

 National SRM MTG-Shelly 

 Tamarisk biocontrol beetle-Scott Marsh 

 Board Shirts & Caps-Barth 

 Interest in continuing mentoring TX GLC?-Barth 

 Presentation at KS Emergency Managers Mtg.-Barth 

 Grassland CRP Signup-Matt Smith 

 Host an upcoming NCGL?-David K & Bill S 

 

 Regional Grazing Group Updates

 KGA 

 TLA 

 CPPRF 

 SHGA 

 Other Updates 

 KS PFC, KS PBA, APBA 

 Others? 

 Calendar- Upcoming events? Next Board Meeting? 

 Adjourn
#### § 181.4 How do I obtain an application?

BIA mails grant application packages for a given fiscal year to all federally recognized tribes by the end of February of the preceding fiscal year. Additional application packages are available from the Program Administrator, Indian Highway Safety Program, P.O. Box 2003, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87103. Each application package contains the necessary information concerning the application process, including format, content, and filing requirements.
**MEMORANDUM**

**DATE:** 0 2 / 1 9 /2015 **FROM:** Laura Farris/EPA Region 8 **TO:** Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants; Docket Id: OAR
– 2013
- 0602 **SUBJECT:** United Power Board of Directors Meeting on 0 2 / 1 8/2015 **SUMMARY :**  Laura Farris participated in a meeting on 02 / 1 8 /2015 to discuss the Clean Power Plan . The meeting was held in Brighton , Colorado
. The Clean Power Plan was proposed on June 2, 2014. **ATTENDEES: EPA**  Laura Farris, EPA Region 8 **United Power Board**  **of Directors** Tim Erickson, East District Beth Martin, East District James Vigesaa, East District Bill Berens, South District Bob Grant, South District Dave Rose, South District Ginny Buczek, West District Brian McCormick, West District Ursula Morgan, West District Richard Newman, Mountain District Douglas Pryce, Mountain District
# C_2014101EN.01000201.xml

| 5.4.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 101/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.4.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 101/2

---

Appointment of a new member of the Commission stakeholder expert group on public procurement following the resignation of an existing member

(2014/C 101/02)

In accordance with Article 4 of the Commission decision of 3 September 2011 (OJ C 291, 4.10.2011, p. 2) setting up a Commission stakeholder expert group on public procurement and the call for applications published in the Official Journal of the European Union (OJ C 301, 17.10.2013, p. 12), the Director-General of DG Internal Market and Services appointed on 5 March 2014, the following member of the group of experts for the remaining period of the three-year mandate:

Official Journal of the European Union

| — | BACIU Ioan |
| --- | --- |

—

BACIU Ioan

Personal data have been collected, processed and published in accordance with the provisions of Regulation (EC) No 45/2001.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>      5
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated financial statements for the six months ended June 30, 1999 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such statements.
</LEGEND>


<S>                                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                          6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                   JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                     JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                                54,258
<SECURITIES>                                               0
<RECEIVABLES>                                              0
<ALLOWANCES>                                               0
<INVENTORY>                                                0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                      54,258
<PP&E>                                                22,846
<DEPRECIATION>                                         2,967
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                        74,827
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              1,136,704
<BONDS>                                                    0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  3,440
<PREFERRED>                                                0
<COMMON>                                                  24
<OTHER-SE>                                        (1,065,341)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                          74,827
<SALES>                                               13,216
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                      13,216
<CGS>                                                 43,923
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                         43,923
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     334,129
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                           0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                    32,475
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     (397,311)
<INCOME-TAX>                                               0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 (397,311)
<DISCONTINUED>                                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                            0
<CHANGES>                                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                                        (397,311)
<EPS-BASIC>                                             (.12)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                           (.12)



</TABLE>
#### § 290.21 May an Indian tribe appeal the ABO's decision?

Yes, you may appeal the ABO's decision in accordance with the regulations at 25 CFR part 2.
# C_2016294EN.01004301.xml

| 12.8.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 294/43 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.8.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 294/43

---

P8_TA(2014)0077

Renewal of the Agreement on cooperation in science and technology with Ukraine ***

European Parliament legislative resolution of 16 December 2014 on the draft Council decision concerning the renewal of the Agreement on cooperation in science and technology between the European Community and Ukraine (11047/2014 — C8-0114/2014 — 2014/0154(NLE))

(Consent)

(2016/C 294/14)

The European Parliament,

The European Parliament

| — | having regard to the draft Council decision concerning the renewal of the Agreement on cooperation in science and technology between the European Community and Ukraine (11047/2014), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the draft Council decision concerning the renewal of the Agreement on cooperation in science and technology between the European Community and Ukraine (11047/2014),

| — | having regard to the Agreement on cooperation in science and technology between the European Community and Ukraine (1), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the Agreement on cooperation in science and technology between the European Community and Ukraine (1),

1

| — | having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Article 186 and Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (a)(v), of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C8-0114/2014), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Article 186 and Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (a)(v), of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C8-0114/2014),

| — | having regard to Rule 99(1), first and third subparagraphs, Rule 99(2), Rule 108(7) and Rule 50(1) of its Rules of Procedure, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Rule 99(1), first and third subparagraphs, Rule 99(2), Rule 108(7) and Rule 50(1) of its Rules of Procedure,

| — | having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy (A8-0039/2014), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy (A8-0039/2014),

| 1. | Gives its consent to renewal of the agreement; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Gives its consent to renewal of the agreement;

| 2. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States and of Ukraine. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States and of Ukraine.

---

(1)  OJ L 36, 12.2.2003, p. 32.

1

---
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 113 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                        March 17, 1999.
    Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker 
may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule XVIII, declare the House resolved into the 
Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of the 
bill (H.R. 820) to authorize appropriations for fiscal years 2000 and 2001 for 
the Coast Guard, and for other purposes. The first reading of the bill shall be 
dispensed with. General debate shall be confined to the bill and shall not 
exceed one hour equally divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking 
minority member of the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure. After 
general debate the bill shall be considered for amendment under the five-minute 
rule. It shall be in order to consider as an original bill for the purpose of 
amendment under the five-minute rule the amendment in the nature of a substitute 
recommended by the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure now printed in 
the bill. The committee amendment in the nature of a substitute shall be 
considered as read. During consideration of the bill for amendment, the Chairman 
of the Committee of the Whole may accord priority in recognition on the basis of 
whether the Member offering an amendment has caused it to be printed in the 
portion of the Congressional Record designated for that purpose in clause 8 of 
rule XVIII. Amendments so printed shall be considered as read. The Chairman of 
the Committee of the Whole may: (1) postpone until a time during further 
consideration in the Committee of the Whole a request for a recorded vote on any 
amendment; and (2) reduce to five minutes the minimum time for electronic voting 
on any postponed question that follows another electronic vote without 
intervening business, provided that the minimum time for electronic voting on 
the first in any series of questions shall be 15 minutes. At the conclusion of 
consideration of the bill for amendment the Committee shall rise and report the 
bill to the House with such amendments as may have been adopted. Any Member may 
demand a separate vote in the House on any amendment adopted in the Committee of 
the Whole to the bill or to the committee amendment in the nature of a 
substitute. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill and 
amendments thereto to final passage without intervening motion except one motion 
to recommit with or without instructions.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
financial statements for the six month period ended June 30, 1999, and
is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                         268,290
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,258
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               269,548
<PP&E>                                           3,259
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 273,963
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,155
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,150
<OTHER-SE>                                     266,658
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   273,963
<SALES>                                          1,258
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,258
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                14,457
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  39
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (10,850)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (10,850)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.01)


</TABLE>
# C_2006157EN.01000101.xml

| 6.7.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 157/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.7.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 157/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

5 July 2006

(2006/C 157/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2794 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 146,74 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4602 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,69370 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,1776 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5677 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 95,98 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,9545 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5750 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 28,475 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 279,95 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6961 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4293 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,0250 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,5780 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,64 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 38,388 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,0160 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,7172 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4152 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,9425 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 2,0963 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0228 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 211,34 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,0617 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 10,2280 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,2425 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 668,13 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,671 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 67,591 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 34,3630 |
| THB | Thai baht | 48,798 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2794

JPY

Japanese yen

146,74

DKK

Danish krone

7,4602

GBP

Pound sterling

0,69370

SEK

Swedish krona

9,1776

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5677

ISK

Iceland króna

95,98

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,9545

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5750

CZK

Czech koruna

28,475

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

279,95

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6961

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4293

PLN

Polish zloty

4,0250

RON

Romanian leu

3,5780

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,64

SKK

Slovak koruna

38,388

TRY

Turkish lira

2,0160

AUD

Australian dollar

1,7172

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4152

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,9425

NZD

New Zealand dollar

2,0963

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0228

KRW

South Korean won

1 211,34

ZAR

South African rand

9,0617

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

10,2280

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,2425

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 668,13

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,671

PHP

Philippine peso

67,591

RUB

Russian rouble

34,3630

THB

Thai baht

48,798

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
#### § 26.20 Can I be required to return portions of my grant?

Yes, grants are awarded for a specific purpose as described in the applicant's ISP. If the funds cannot be spent according to the ISP, the unused portion must be returned to the service provider's job placement and training budget.