alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 162.358 What are the consent requirements for a leasehold mortgage of a residential lease? ( a ) Unless the lease provides otherwise, the lessee must notify all Indian landowners of the proposed leasehold mortgage.
( b ) The Indian landowners, or their representatives under § 162.013, must consent to a leasehold mortgage of a residential lease in the same percentages and manner as a new residential lease under § 162.012, unless the lease: ( 1 ) States that landowner consent is not required for a leasehold mortgage and identifies what law would apply in case of foreclosure;
( 2 ) Provides that individual Indian landowners are deemed to have consented where they do not object in writing to the leasehold mortgage within a specified period of time following the landowners' receipt of the leasehold mortgage and the lease meets the requirements of paragraph (c) of this section;
( 3 ) Authorizes one or more representatives to consent to a leasehold mortgage on behalf of all Indian landowners; or
( 4 ) Designates us as the Indian landowners' representative for the purposes of consenting to a leasehold mortgage.
( c ) If the lease provides for deemed consent under paragraph (b)(2) of this section, it must require the parties to submit to us: ( 1 ) A copy of the executed leasehold mortgage or other documentation of any Indian landowners' actual consent;
( 2 ) Proof of mailing of the leasehold mortgage to any Indian landowners who are deemed to have consented; and
( 3 ) Any other pertinent information for us to review.
H. Res. 386

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

November 18, 1999.

Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall

be in order to consider the conference report to accompany

the bill (H.R. 3194) making appropriations for the government of the District of Columbia and other activities chargeable in whole or in part against revenues of said District for

the fiscal year ending September 30, 2000, and for other purposes. All points of order against the conference report and

against its consideration are waived. The conference report

shall be considered as read. The conference report shall be

debatable for one hour equally divided and controlled by the

chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on

Appropriations. The previous question shall be considered as

ordered on the conference report to final adoption without intervening motion except one motion to recommit.

SEC. 2. Upon adoption of the conference report addressed in the first section of this resolution, the House shall

be considered to have adopted a concurrent resolution consisting of the text printed in section 3.
2

•HRES 386 EH

SEC. 3. The text of the concurrent resolution addressed

in section 2 is as follows:

‘‘Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

concurring), That the enrolled copy of the bill (H.R. 2466)

making appropriations for the Department of the Interior

and related agencies for the fiscal year ending September 30,

2000, and for other purposes, shall not be presented to the

President, to the end that the bill be, and is hereby, laid on

the table.’’.

Attest:

Clerk.
### §20237. Numbers to be recommended for promotion

(a) Promotion to Grades Below Brigadier General.—

(1) Determination of maximum number.—Before convening a selection board under section 20211 of this title to consider officers for recommendation for promotion to a grade below brigadier general and in any competitive category, the Secretary of the Air Force shall determine the maximum number of officers in that competitive category that the board may recommend for promotion.

(2) Determinations.—In order to make the determination under paragraph (1), the Secretary shall determine—

(A) the number of positions needed to accomplish mission objectives which require officers of that competitive category in the grade to which the board will recommend officers for promotion;

(B) the estimated number of officers needed to fill vacancies in those positions during the period in which it is anticipated that officers selected for promotion will be promoted; and

(C) the number of officers in a space force active status authorized by the Secretary of the Air Force to serve both on sustained duty and not on sustained duty in the grade and competitive category under consideration.

(b) Promotion to Brigadier General and Major General.—

(1) Determination of maximum numbers.—Before convening a selection board under section 20211 of this title to consider officers for recommendation for promotion to the grade of brigadier general or major general, the Secretary of the Air Force shall determine the maximum number of officers serving in a space force active status on sustained duty, and the maximum number of officers serving in a space force active status not on sustained duty, that the board may recommend for promotion.

(2) Determinations.—In order to make the determinations under paragraph (1), the Secretary shall determine—

(A) the number of positions needed to accomplish mission objectives which require officers serving in a space force active status on sustained duty, and in a space force active status not on sustained duty, in the grade to which the board will recommend officers for promotion; and

(B) the estimated number of officers on sustained duty and not on sustained duty needed to fill vacancies in those positions over the 24-month period beginning on the date on which the selection board convenes.

(Added Pub. L. 118–31, div. A, title XVII, §1716(c), Dec. 22, 2023, 137 Stat. 644.)
###### Editorial Note on Part 23

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 23 appear at 79 FR 27190, May 13, 2014.

#### § 23.116 What happens after a petition for transfer is made?

Upon receipt of a transfer petition, the State court must ensure that the Tribal court is promptly notified in writing of the transfer petition. This notification may request a timely response regarding whether the Tribal court wishes to decline the transfer.
§ 227.1 Definitions. ( a ) The term “superintendent” in this part refers to the superintendent or other officers of the Bureau of Indian Affairs or of the Government who may have jurisdiction over the Shoshone or Wind River Reservation.
( b ) The term “supervisor” in this part refers to a representative of the Secretary of the Interior, under direction of the Director of the U.S. Geological Survey, authorized and empowered to supervise and direct operations under oil and gas mining leases, to furnish scientific and technical information and advice, to ascertain and record the amount and value of production, and to determine and record rentals and royalties due and paid.

Cross Reference:
For rules and regulations of the Geological Survey, see 30 CFR chapter II.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

        STATEMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER UNDER 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

     I, William E. McGlashan, Jr., the chief executive officer of Critical Path,
Inc. (the "Company"), certify for the purposes of section 1350 of chapter 63 of
title 18 of the United States Code that, to my knowledge,:

     (i) the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the quarterly
period ended June 30, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements
of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

     (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Date: August 14, 2003                            /s/ William E. McGlashan, Jr.
                                           -------------------------------------
                                                William E. McGlashan, Jr.
                                           Chief Executive Officer and Chairman

A signed original of this written statement required by 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
has been provided to Critical Path, Inc. and will be retained by Critical Path,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.

------------------
(1) The material contained in this Exhibit 32.1 is not deemed "filed" with the
SEC and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company
under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, whether
made before or after the date hereof and irrespective of any general
incorporation language contained in such filing.
§ 20.514 What assistance can the courts request from social services on behalf of children? The courts can request the following: ( a ) Investigations of law enforcement reports of child abuse and neglect;
( b ) Assessment of the need for out-of-home placement of the child; and
( c ) Provision of court-related services following adjudication, such as monitoring, foster care, or residential care, or pre/post placement services.
# C_2006190EN.01002301.xml

| 12.8.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 190/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.8.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 190/23

---

Action brought on 22 May 2006 — SANOFI AVENTIS v OHIM — G.D. SEARLE (‘ATURION’)

(Case T -146/06)

(2006/C 190/41)

Language in which the application was lodged: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: SANOFI AVENTIS, S.A. (Paris, France) (represented by: E. Armijo Chavarri and A. Castán Pérez-Gómez, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: G.D. SEARLE LLC

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 3 February 2006 in Case R 227/2005-1; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 3 February 2006 in Case R 227/2005-1;

| — | Order OHIM to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order OHIM to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: G.D. SEARLE LLC.

Applicant for a Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: Word mark ‘ATURION’ for goods in Class 5 — application No1 662 311.

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The applicant.

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited in opposition: National word mark ‘URION’ for goods in Class 5.

Mark or sign cited in opposition:

Decision of the Opposition Division: Rejection of the opposition.

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissal of the appeal.

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94, given that the marks in question may create a likelihood of confusion on the market.

Pleas in law:

---
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Somsak Chivavibul,
certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period
covered by this report on Form 10-K of SLM Student Loan Trust 2012-1 (the Exchange Act periodic reports);

2. Based on my
knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing
and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required under this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as
disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer and administrator have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreement and administration agreement, as applicable, in all material respects; and

5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on
assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this
report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K. In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as indenture trustee.

Date: March 27, 2014



|                                                                     
|---------------------------------------------------------------------
|/S/ SOMSAK CHIVAVIBUL                                                
|Somsak Chivavibul                                                    
|President and Chief Financial Officer (Senior Securitization Officer)
|SLM Funding LLC
§ 273.181 Are there Privacy Act requirements for contracts? ( a ) When a contractor operates a system of records to accomplish a Bureau function, the contractor must comply with subpart K of 43 CFR part 2 which implements the Privacy Act (5 U.S.C. 552a). Examples of the contractor's responsibilities are: ( 1 ) To continue maintaining systems of records declared by the Bureau to be subject to the Privacy Act;
( 2 ) To make such records available to individuals involved;
( 3 ) To disclose an individual's record to third parties only after receiving permission from the individual to whom the record pertains, and in accordance with the exceptions listed in 43 CFR 2.231;
( 4 ) To establish a procedure to account for access, disclosures, denials, and amendments to records; and
( 5 ) To provide safeguards for the protection of the records.
( b ) The contractor may not, without prior approval of the Bureau: ( 1 ) Discontinue or alter any established systems of records;
( 2 ) Deny requests for notification or access of records; or
( 3 ) Approve or deny requests for amendments of records.
( c ) The contractor may not establish a new system of records without prior approval of the Department of Interior and the Office of Management and Budget.
( d ) The contractor may not collect information about an individual unless it is relevant or necessary to accomplish a purpose of the Bureau as required by statute or Executive Order.
( e ) The contractor is subject to 5 U.S.C. 552a(i)(1), which imposes criminal penalties for knowingly and willfully disclosing a record about an individual without the written request or consent of that individual unless disclosure is permitted under one of the exceptions.
### §572. Warrant officers: original appointment; service credit

(a) For the purposes of promotion, persons originally appointed in regular or reserve warrant officer grades shall be credited with such service as the Secretary concerned may prescribe. However, such a person may not be credited with a period of service greater than the period of active service performed in the grade, or pay grade corresponding to the grade, in which so appointed, or in any higher grade or pay grade.

(b) The Secretary concerned shall credit a person who is receiving an original appointment as a warrant officer in the regular component of an armed force under the jurisdiction of such Secretary concerned, and who has advanced education or training or special experience, with constructive service for such education, training, or experience, as follows:

(1) For special training or experience in a particular warrant officer field designated by the Secretary concerned, if such training or experience is directly related to the operational needs of the armed force concerned, as determined by such Secretary concerned.

(2) For advanced education in a warrant officer field designated by the Secretary concerned, if such education is directly related to the operational needs of the armed force concerned, as determined by such Secretary concerned.

(Added Pub. L. 102–190, div. A, title XI, §1112(a), Dec. 5, 1991, 105 Stat. 1493; amended Pub. L. 117–263, div. A, title V, §507(a), Dec. 23, 2022, 136 Stat. 2558.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

Provisions similar to those in this section were contained in section 556 of this title prior to repeal by Pub. L. 102–190, §1112(a).

#### Amendments

2022—Pub. L. 117–263 designated existing provisions as subsec. (a) and added subsec. (b).

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Feb. 1, 1992, see section 1132 of Pub. L. 102–190, set out as an Effective Date of 1991 Amendment note under section 521 of this title.
### §7019. General Counsel

(a) There is a General Counsel of the Department of the Army, appointed from civilian life by the President, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate.

(b) The General Counsel shall perform such functions as the Secretary of the Army may prescribe.

(Added Pub. L. 99–433, title V, §501(a)(7), Oct. 1, 1986, 100 Stat. 1038, §3019; amended Pub. L. 100–456, div. A, title VII, §703(a), Sept. 29, 1988, 102 Stat. 1996; renumbered §7019, Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, §808(a), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1838.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–232 renumbered section 3019 of this title as this section.

1988—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 100–456 inserted ", by and with the advice and consent of the Senate" before period at end.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2018 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 115–232 effective Feb. 1, 2019, with provision for the coordination of amendments and special rule for certain redesignations, see section 800 of Pub. L. 115–232, set out as a note preceding section 3001 of this title.

#### Effective Date of 1988 Amendment

Pub. L. 100–456, div. A, title VII, §703(c), Sept. 29, 1988, 102 Stat. 1996, provided that: "The amendments made by this section [amending this section and sections 5019 and 8019 of this title] shall apply to appointments made under sections 3019, 5019, and 8019 [now 7019, 8019, and 9019], respectively, of title 10, United States Code, on and after the date of the enactment of this Act [Sept. 29, 1988]."
#### § 31.2 Use of Federal school facilities.

Federal Indian school facilities may be used for community activities and for adult education activities upon approval by the superintendent or officer in charge.
Exhibit 35.7










ANNUAL STATEMENT AS TO COMPLIANCE

UBS-Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Trust 2011-C1



The undersigned, David Co, a Director of Deutsche Bank Trust Company
Americas, as the Certificate Administrator (a “Certifying Servicer”) under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, dated
as of December 1, 2011, as amended (the “Agreement”), by and among, Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Securities Inc., as Depositor,
Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer, Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association,
as Special Servicer, Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as Trustee, Certificate Administrator, Paying Agent and Custodian, and
Trimont Real Estate Advisors, Inc., as Operating Advisor, here by certifies in accordance with Section 10.11 of the Agreement:



| | A) | A review of such Certifying Servicer's activities from January 1, 2015 to December 31, 2015 (the “reporting period”) and of such
Certifying Servicer's performance under the Agreement has been made under such officer's supervision and
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | B) | That, to the best of such officer's knowledge, based on such review, such Certifying Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations
under the Agreement, in all material respects during the reporting period.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



DEUTSCHE BANK TRUST COMPANY AMERICAS

as Certificate Administrator



/s/ David Co

BY: David Co

Title: Director

Date: March 1, 2016
###### Editorial Note on Part 23

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 23 appear at 79 FR 27190, May 13, 2014.

#### § 23.3 Policy.

In enacting the Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978, Pub. L. 95-608, the Congress has declared that it is the policy of this Nation to protect the best interests of Indian children and to promote the stability and security of Indian tribes and Indian families by the establishment of minimum Federal standards to prevent the arbitrary removal of Indian children from their families and tribes and to ensure that measures which prevent the breakup of Indian families are followed in child custody proceedings (25 U.S.C. 1902). Indian child and family service programs receiving title II funds and operated by federally recognized Indian tribes and off-reservation Indian organizations shall reflect the unique values of Indian culture and promote the stability and security of Indian children, Indian families and Indian communities. It is the policy of the Bureau of Indian Affairs to emphasize and facilitate the comprehensive design, development and implementation of Indian child and family service programs in coordination with other Federal, state, local, and tribal programs which strengthen and preserve Indian families and Indian tribes.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4.

** The dismissal of Gordon’s claims against the other named defendants was affirmed by this court on February 11, 2000.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-31176 Summary Calendar

WAYNE GORDON, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus CITY OF NEW ORLEANS; ET AL Defendants, CURTIS W. THORNE, Deputy #809 Jefferson Parish Sheriff’s Office, STEPHEN P. RANDON, Deputy #103261 Jefferson Parish Sheriff’s Office, Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana

USDC No. 98-CV-3191-T

- - - - - - - - - - August 7, 2001 Before JOLLY, DeMOSS, and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Wayne Gordon, Louisiana prisoner #95912, appeals the district court’s dismissal, after remand by this court, of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 false-arrest-and-imprisonment claims against Deputies Curtis Thorne and Stephen Randon, the Sheriff’s Office employees who allegedly arrested him. ** The district court didNo. 00-31176 -2-not abuse its discretion in ruling that Gordon’s unlawful-arrestand-imprisonment claims against Thorne and Randon were barred by the doctrine of Heck v. Humphrey , 512 U.S. 477 (1994). Although “a claim of unlawful arrest, standing alone, does not necessarily implicate the validity of a criminal prosecution following the arrest,” the use at trial of evidence seized during the arrest subjects the claim to the Heck bar, since invalidation of the arrest would undermine the validity of the conviction. Mackey v. Dickson , 47 F.3d 744, 746 (5th Cir. 1995). Gordon does not contest that the gun seized during his arrest was used as evidence at his trial for aggravated battery, and the evidence submitted upon remand bears this out. Accordingly, Gordon’s unlawful-arrest-and-imprisonment claims against Deputies Thorne and Randon are barred by Heck
. Id
. AFFIRMED.