alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2006165EN.01003001.xml

| 15.7.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 165/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.7.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 165/30

---

Action brought on 5 May 2006 — Sanabel Relief Agency v Council

(Case T-136/06)

(2006/C 165/59)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Sanabel Relief Agency Ltd (Birmingham, United Kingdom) (represented by: N. Garcia, Solicitor, S. Cox, Barrister)

Applicant:

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | Annulment of Article 2 of Council Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 of 27 May 2002 as amended by Council Regulation (EC) 561/2003 of 27 March 2003 and Commission Regulation (EC) No 246/2006 of 10 February 2006 and of the reference to the applicant in Annex I; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annulment of Article 2 of Council Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 of 27 May 2002 as amended by Council Regulation (EC) 561/2003 of 27 March 2003 and Commission Regulation (EC) No 246/2006 of 10 February 2006 and of the reference to the applicant in Annex I;

| — | order the Council to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Council to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The pleas in law and main arguments relied on by the applicant are identical to those relied on in Case T-135/06 Al-Faqih v Council.

Al-Faqih v Council

---
# C_2013269EN.01000301.xml

| 18.9.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 269/3 |
| --------- | -- | -------------------------------------- | ------- |

---

Winding-up proceedings

Decision to initiate winding-up proceedings against ΔΙΕΘΝΗΣ ΕΝΩΣΙΣ Α.Α.Ε. (International Union Insurances SA)

(Publication in accordance with Article 14 of Directive 2001/17/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the reorganisation and winding-up of insurance undertakings)

2013/C 269/03

| Insurance undertaking | ΔΙΕΘΝΗΣ ΕΝΩΣΙΣ Α.Α.Ε., with its registered office in Athens
Ilia Iliou 66 117 44 Athens GREECE | Ilia Iliou 66 | 117 44 Athens | GREECE |
| ------------------------------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------- | ------------- | ------ |
| Ilia Iliou 66 | | | | |
| 117 44 Athens | | | | |
| GREECE | | | | |
| Date, entry into force and type of decision | Decision No 84/1 of 16 July 2013 of the Credit and Insurance Committee of the Bank of Greece to permanently withdraw the operating licence of the company and to wind it up
Entry into force: 16 July 2013 | | | |
| Competent authorities | Bank of Greece, Department of Private Insurance Supervision
Address:
E. Venizelos Avenue 21 102 50 Athens GREECE | E. Venizelos Avenue 21 | 102 50 Athens | GREECE |
| E. Venizelos Avenue 21 | | | | |
| 102 50 Athens | | | | |
| GREECE | | | | |
| Supervisory authorities | Bank of Greece, Department of Private Insurance Supervision
Address:
E. Venizelos Avenue 21 102 50 Athens GREECE | E. Venizelos Avenue 21 | 102 50 Athens | GREECE |
| E. Venizelos Avenue 21 | | | | |
| 102 50 Athens | | | | |
| GREECE | | | | |
| Appointed liquidator | Antigoni Vafeidou
(Winding-up supervisor)
Address:
Pindarou 12 106 71 Athens GREECE | Pindarou 12 | 106 71 Athens | GREECE |
| Pindarou 12 | | | | |
| 106 71 Athens | | | | |
| GREECE | | | | |
| Applicable law | Greek law in accordance with the provisions of Article 3(3), Articles 7 to 9 and 17(a) to 17(c) of Decree-Law No 400/1970 | | | |

---
COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

STATE OF LOUISIANA

RE: Docket [Number 2022 -CA -0831

Aleshia and David Carey

Versus - - 

17th Judicial District Court

United Property and Casualty Insurance Company Case #: 143802

Lafourche Parish

On Application for Rehearing Fled on 06/ 08/ 2023 By Aleshia and David Carey

Rehearing DP- A- e A

G

Mitchell R. Theriot

12t.-, c4a, 4, 

Wayne Ray hutz

Chris Hester

Date AN 14 2023

Rodd Naqu
#### § 20.513 Should Interstate Compacts be used for the placement of children?

Interstate compact agreements should be used when appropriate for foster care, adoption and guardianship to protect the best interests of the child and to assure the availability of the funding resources and services from the originating placement source.
### §10142. Ready Reserve

(a) The Ready Reserve consists of units or Reserves, or both, liable for active duty as provided in sections 12301 and 12302 of this title.

(b) The authorized strength of the Ready Reserve is 2,900,000.

(Added Pub. L. 103–337, div. A, title XVI, §1661(a)(1), Oct. 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 2972.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

Provisions similar to those in this section were contained in section 268(a) of this title, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 103–337, §1661(a)(2)(A).

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Dec. 1, 1994, except as otherwise provided, see section 1691 of Pub. L. 103–337, set out as a note under section 10001 of this title.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 321 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                       October 5, 1999.
    Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker 
may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule XVIII, declare the House resolved into the 
Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of the 
bill (H.R. 764) to reduce the incidence of child abuse and neglect, and for 
other purposes. The first reading of the bill shall be dispensed with. All 
points of order against consideration of the bill are waived. General debate 
shall be confined to the bill and shall not exceed one hour equally divided and 
controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on the 
Judiciary. After general debate the bill shall be considered for amendment under 
the five-minute rule. The bill shall be considered as read. Points of order 
against provisions in the bill for failure to comply with clause 4 of rule XXI 
are waived. During consideration of the bill for amendment, the Chairman of the 
Committee of the Whole may accord priority in recognition on the basis of 
whether the Member offering an amendment has caused it to be printed in the 
portion of the Congressional Record designated for that purpose in clause 8 of 
rule XVIII. Amendments so printed shall be considered as read. The Chairman of 
the Committee of the Whole may: (1) postpone until a time during further 
consideration in the Committee of the Whole a request for a recorded vote on any 
amendment; and (2) reduce to five minutes the minimum time for electronic voting 
on any postponed question that follows another electronic vote without 
intervening business, provided that the minimum time for electronic voting on 
the first in any series of questions shall be 15 minutes. At the conclusion of 
consideration of the bill for amendment the Committee shall rise and report the 
bill to the House with such amendments as may have been adopted. The previous 
question shall be considered as ordered on the bill and amendments thereto to 
final passage without intervening motion except one motion to recommit with or 
without instructions.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 438 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                        March 15, 2000.
    Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in order to 
consider the conference report to accompany the bill (H.R. 1000) to amend title 
49, United States Code, to reauthorize programs of the Federal Aviation 
Administration, and for other purposes. All points of order against the 
conference report and against its consideration are waived.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS, THE CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND THE
ACCOMPANYING NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                          52,012
<SECURITIES>                                     2,516
<RECEIVABLES>                                   20,573
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (1,067)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                80,081
<PP&E>                                          21,364
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 206,067
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          124,550
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           147
<OTHER-SE>                                      50,409
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   206,067
<SALES>                                         57,170
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                57,170
<CGS>                                           50,750
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   50,750
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 9,010
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (574)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,051)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       782
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,269)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  (257)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,526)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.10)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.10)


</TABLE>
##### 



MIDLAND CAPITAL HOLDINGS CORPORATION
 EXHIBIT 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date:  November 14, 2006
    BY:
    /s/ Paul ZogaPaul ZogasPresident, Chief Executive Officer
and Chief Financial Officer
#### § 214.26 Fine; notice and hearing.

Violation of any of the terms or conditions of any lease or of the regulations pertaining thereto shall subject the lease to cancellation by the Secretary of the Interior, or the lessee to a fine of not exceeding $500 per day for each and every day the terms of the lease or of the regulations are violated, or the orders of the superintendent in reference thereto are not complied with, or to both such fine and cancellation in the discretion of the Secretary of the Interior: *Provided,* That the lessee shall be entitled to notice and hearing with respect to the terms of the lease or of the regulations violated, which hearing shall be held by the superintendent, whose findings shall be conclusive unless an appeal be taken to the Secretary of the Interior within 30 days after notice of the superintendent's decision, and the decision of the Secretary of the Interior upon appeal shall be conclusive.
155 So.2d 302

#### TAXPAYERS AND CITIZENS OF the CITY OF MOBILE v. BOARD OF WATER AND SEWER COMMISSIONERS OF the CITY OF MOBILE.

1 Div. 145.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

June 20, 1963.

*350Carl M. Booth, Circuit Solicitor, Mobile, for appellants.

Gaillard, Smith & Green, Mobile, for appellee.

LAWSON, Justice.

The instant case is filed under the authority of Act 859, approved September 19, 1953, General Acts 1953, p. 1148. That statute authorizes certain public corporations and, public boards to institute proceedings in the circuit court for the purpose of validating proposed bonds or other evidences of debt prior to their issuance.

The instant case has reference to the proposal to issue $3,750,000 of Water Service Revenue Bonds of the Board of Water and Sewer Commissionei-s of the City of Mobile in addition to the bonds heretofore issued by that Board and validated in prior litigation. See City of Mobile v. Board of Water and Sewer Com’rs of City of Mobile, 258 Ala. 669, 64 So.2d 824; Taxpayers and Citizens of City of Mobile v. Board of Water and Sewer Com’rs of City of Mobile, 261 Ala. 110, 73 So.2d 97.

The trial court in the instant suit held that the proposed issues, designated Series H, were legal and regular and ordered them to be validated. An appeal from that decree has been taken to this court by the respondents below.

The brief filed on behalf of the appellants raises for our consideration only two questions. The first point taken by the appellants is that the Board of Water and Sewer Commissioners was without authority to consolidate the water system and the sewer system into one facility. We held that the Board of Commissioners had the authority to consolidate both systems into one in Taxpayers and Citizens of City of Mobile v. Board of Water and Sewer Com’rs of City of Mobile, supra.

The only other contention made in the brief of appellants is that the issuance of the proposed bonds would violate §§ *94,*222 and 225 of the Constitution of Alabama. There is no merit in this insistence. City of Mobile v. Board of Water and Sewer Com’rs of City of Mobile, supra; Taxpayers and Citizens of City of Mobile v. Board of Water and Sewer Com’rs of City of Mobile, supra.

Upon consideration, we have reached the conclusion that, in so far as any question here raised is involved, the proposed bonds when issued will be valid and the proceedings which have been taken for their issuance are valid and in accordance with the law. The decree is to that extent affirmed.

Affirmed.

LIVINGSTON, C. J., and SIMPSON, MERRILL and HARWOOD, JJ., concur.
### §7771. Acceptance of donations: land for mobilization, training, supply base, or aviation field

The Secretary of the Army may accept for the United States a gift of—

(1) land that he considers suitable and desirable for a permanent mobilization, training, or supply station; and

(2) land that he considers suitable and desirable for an aviation field, if the gift is from a citizen of the United States and its terms authorize the use of the property by the United States for any purpose.

(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 268, §4771; renumbered §7771, Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, §808(d), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1839.)

| Revised section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 4771 | 10:1342.10:1344. | Aug. 29, 1916, ch. 418 (6th and 8th pars. under "Office of the Chief Signal Officer"), 39 Stat. 622, 623. |

10:1344.

10:1344 (last 40 words) is omitted as executed. The words "tract or tracts", in 10:1342 and 1344, are omitted as surplusage. The words "and remount station", in 10:1342, are omitted, since the property and civilian personnel of the Remount Service of the Quartermaster Corps were transferred to the Department of Agriculture by the Act of April 21, 1948, ch. 224, 62 Stat. 197 (7 U.S.C. 436–438). The words "by the United States for any purpose" are substituted for the words "for any other service of the United States which may hereafter appear desirable", in 10:1342. The words "from any person", in 10:1344, are omitted as surplusage.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–232 renumbered section 4771 of this title as this section.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2018 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 115–232 effective Feb. 1, 2019, with provision for the coordination of amendments and special rule for certain redesignations, see section 800 of Pub. L. 115–232, set out as a note preceding section 3001 of this title.
H. Res. 352

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

November 3, 1999.

Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule

XVIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee of the

Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of

the bill (H.R. 2389) to restore stability and predictability to

the annual payments made to States and counties containing

National Forest System lands and public domain lands managed by the Bureau of Land Management for use by the

counties for the benefit of public schools, roads, and other

purposes. The first reading of the bill shall be dispensed with.

All points of order against consideration of the bill are

waived. General debate shall be confined to the bill and shall

not exceed one hour equally divided and controlled by the

chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on

Agriculture. After general debate the bill shall be considered

for amendment under the five-minute rule. In lieu of the

amendment recommended by the Committee on Agriculture

now printed in the bill, it shall be in order to consider as an
2

•HRES 352 EH

original bill for the purpose of amendment under the fiveminute rule the amendment in the nature of a substitute

printed in the Congressional Record and numbered 1 pursuant to clause 8 of rule XVIII, modified by the amendments

printed in the report of the Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution. That amendment in the nature of a

substitute shall be considered as read. All points of order

against that amendment in the nature of a substitute are

waived. During consideration of the bill for amendment, the

Chairman of the Committee of the Whole may accord priority

in recognition on the basis of whether the Member offering

an amendment has caused it to be printed in the portion of

the Congressional Record designated for that purpose in

clause 8 of rule XVIII. Amendments so printed shall be considered as read. The Chairman of the Committee of the

Whole may: (1) postpone until a time during further consideration in the Committee of the Whole a request for a recorded vote on any amendment; and (2) reduce to five minutes the minimum time for electronic voting on any postponed question that follows another electronic vote without

intervening business, provided that the minimum time for

electronic voting on the first in any series of questions shall

be 15 minutes. At the conclusion of consideration of the bill

for amendment the Committee shall rise and report the bill

to the House with such amendments as may have been adopt-
3

•HRES 352 EH

ed. Any Member may demand a separate vote in the House

on any amendment adopted in the Committee of the Whole

to the bill or to the amendment in the nature of a substitute

made in order as original text. The previous question shall be

considered as ordered on the bill and amendments thereto to

final passage without intervening motion except one motion

to recommit with or without instructions.

Attest:

Clerk.
EXHIBIT 32.2  HAMMER FIBER OPTICS HOLDINGS CORP.  Certification of the Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  In connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of Hammer Fiber Optics Holdings Corp. (the Company) for the year ended July, 2016 (the Report), I, Michael Cothill, Chairman and Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   November 30th, 2016  /s/ Michael CothillPrincipal Financial Officer
#### § 226.42 Penalty for violation of lease terms.

Violation of any of the terms or conditions of any lease or of the regulations in this part shall subject the lease to cancellation by the Superintendent, or Lessee to a fine of not more than $1,153 per day for each day of such violation or noncompliance with the orders of the Superintendent, or to both such fine and cancellation. Fines not received within 10 days after notice of the decision shall be subject to late charges at the rate of not less than 11/2 percent per month for each month or fraction thereof until paid. The Osage Tribal Council, subject to the approval of the Superintendent, may waive the late charge.

[81 FR 39573, June 17, 2016, as amended at 81 FR 42481, June 30, 2016; 82 FR 7653, Jan. 23, 2017; 83 FR 5195, Feb. 6, 2018; 84 FR 15101, Apr. 15, 2019; 85 FR 9369, Feb. 19, 2020; 86 FR 7348, Jan. 28, 2021; 87 FR 13156, Mar. 9, 2022; 88 FR 13022, Mar. 2, 2023; 89 FR 18363, Mar. 13, 2024]
#### § 161.601 How will BIA monitor permit compliance?

Unless the permit provides otherwise, BIA and/or Navajo Nation may enter the range unit at any reasonable time, without prior notice, to protect the interests of the Navajo Nation and ensure that the permittee is in compliance with the operating requirements of the permit.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                           3,395
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   24,390
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,160
<INVENTORY>                                      5,981
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                37,153
<PP&E>                                          20,073
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,606
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 317,369
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           45,439
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             7
<OTHER-SE>                                     263,451
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   317,369
<SALES>                                         17,324
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                22,644
<CGS>                                           14,074
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   17,740
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                27,703
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   139
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 429
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (23,002)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       118
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (23,120)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (23,120)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.42)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.42)


</TABLE>
#### BOUTWELL v. BOUTWELL

No. 142P90

Case below: 97 N.C.App. 332

Petition by defendant for temporary stay denied 4 April 1990.
#### § 175.140 What is BIA's authority to collect my tax payer identification number?

We are required to collect your taxpayer identification number under the authority of, and as prescribed in, the Debt Collection Improvement Act of 1996, Public Law 104-134 (110 Stat. 1321-364).