alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1

Statement of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Knight Capital Group, Inc. (the Company) for the
quarter ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Thomas M. Joyce, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or, 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/    THOMAS M. JOYCEName: Title: Date:

Thomas M. Joyce Chief Executive Officer August 11, 2008


This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
IV

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 255

Designating majority membership to certain standing committees of the

House.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 19, 1999

Mr. CALVERT submitted the following resolution; which was considered and

agreed to

RESOLUTION

Designating majority membership to certain standing

committees of the House.

1 Resolved, That the following named Member be, and

2 he is hereby, elected to the following standing committee

3 of the House of Representatives:

4 COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS: Mr. Blunt of Mis5 souri.

Æ
### §7806. Settlement or compromise: final and conclusive

Notwithstanding any other provision of law, upon acceptance of payment the settlement or compromise of a claim under section 7802 or 7803 of this title is final and conclusive.

(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 272, §4806; renumbered §7806 and amended Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, §§808(d), 809(a), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1839, 1840.)

| Revised section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 4806 | 10:1861 (35 words before 1st proviso).10:1862 (last 32 words of 2d sentence). | Oct. 20, 1951, ch. 524, §§1 (35 words before 1st proviso), 2 (last 32 words of 2d sentence), 65 Stat. 572, 573. |

10:1862 (last 32 words of 2d sentence).

The words "for all purposes" and "to the contrary", in 10:1861 and 1862; "by the claimant and not until then", in 10:1861; and "but not until then", in 10:1862; are omitted as surplusage.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–232, §809(a), substituted "section 7802 or 7803" for "section 4802 or 4803".

Pub. L. 115–232, §808(d), renumbered section 4806 of this title as this section.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2018 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 115–232 effective Feb. 1, 2019, with provision for the coordination of amendments and special rule for certain redesignations, see section 800 of Pub. L. 115–232, set out as a note preceding section 3001 of this title.
### §8673. Model Basin; investigation of hull designs

The Secretary of the Navy may authorize experiments to be made at the Model Basin for private persons. The costs of experiments made for private persons shall be paid by those persons under regulations prescribed by the Secretary. The results of private experiments are confidential and may not be divulged without the consent of the persons for whom they are made. However, the data obtained from such experiments may be used by the Secretary for governmental purposes, subject to the patent laws of the United States.

(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 451, §7303; Pub. L. 89–718, §41, Nov. 2, 1966, 80 Stat. 1120; renumbered §8673 and amended Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, §807(d)(2), title X, §1015(a), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1836, 1949.)

| Revised section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 7303 | 5 U.S.C. 430a. | May 6, 1936, ch. 333, 49 Stat. 1263; June 20, 1940, ch. 400, §1(a), (b), 54 Stat. 492. |

In subsection (a) the authority to purchase a site and construct the model basin is omitted as executed. The words "David W. Taylor Model Basin, Carderock, Maryland" are inserted to designate the model basin established under this authority. The words "investigations to determine" are substituted for the words "work of investigating and determining." The phrase "vessels, including aircraft" is changed to read "vessels and aircraft", and the words "their design" are substituted for "ship design".

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–232, §807(d)(2), renumbered section 7303 of this title as this section.

Pub. L. 115–232, §1015(a), struck out subsec. (b) designation before "The Secretary" and struck out subsec. (a) which read as follows: "An office or agency in the Department of the Navy designated by the Secretary of the Navy shall conduct at the David W. Taylor Model Basin, Carderock, Maryland, investigations to determine the most suitable shapes and forms for United States vessels and aircraft and investigations of other problems of their design."

1966—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 89–718 substituted "An officer or agency of the Department of the Navy designated by the Secretary of the Navy" for "The Bureau of Ships".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2018 Amendment

Amendment by section 807(d)(2) of Pub. L. 115–232 effective Feb. 1, 2019, with provision for the coordination of amendments and special rule for certain redesignations, see section 800 of Pub. L. 115–232, set out as a note preceding section 3001 of this title.
#### § 117.11 Insurance.

The superintendent may obtain policies of insurance covering the restricted property, real or personal, of minor Indians and pay the premiums thereon from the funds of the minors. Upon application by an adult Indian the superintendent may procure insurance on any restricted property, real or personal, owned by the applicant and pay the necessary premiums from his surplus or allowance funds. When authorized by the Commissioner, the superintendent may also procure insurance on restricted property, real or personal, of any adult Indian who neglects or refuses to take out such insurance.
§ 243.7 How can a non-Native acquire live reindeer? If you are a non-Native who wants to acquire live Alaskan reindeer, you must apply to us in writing. We will either grant the request and issue a written permit valid for 90 days or reject the request and give our reasons in writing. Any transfer that we authorize is subject to the following conditions: ( a ) The transfer must meet the requirements of the Act and this part.
( b ) Within 30 days of transfer, you must either butcher the reindeer in Alaska or ship them out of Alaska. If you ship the reindeer out alive: ( 1 ) You must comply with all Federal and State animal health regulations governing transfers and shipments; and
( 2 ) The reindeer and their descendants must never be brought back to Alaska alive.
( c ) Within 30 days of the transfer, you must report to us the actual number of reindeer shipped out or slaughtered.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 11


                        BINDVIEW DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
       STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS (LOSS) PER COMMON SHARE
                                   (UNAUDITED)
                    (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                        QUARTER                   NINE MONTHS
                                                  ENDED SEPTEMBER 30,         ENDED SEPTEMBER 30,
                                                ----------------------      -----------------------
                                                  2000          1999          2000           1999
                                                --------      --------      --------       --------
<S>                                             <C>           <C>           <C>            <C>
Net income (loss)                               $  1,787      $  1,376      $ (4,359)      $ (1,187)
                                                ========      ========      ========       ========

Shares used in basic calculation
        Total basic shares                        52,021        49,027        51,538         47,404

Additional shares for diluted computation:
  Effect of stock options                          3,006         4,353         5,079            100
  Effect of warrants                                  --           109            20          4,960
  Exclusion of share equivalents that are
    anti-dilutive because a loss was
    incurred                                          --            --        (5,099)        (5,060)
                                                --------      --------      --------       --------
        Total diluted shares                      55,027        53,489        51,538         47,404
                                                ========      ========      ========       ========
Earnings (loss) per common share
  Basic                                         $   0.03      $   0.03      $  (0.08)      $  (0.03)
  Diluted                                       $   0.03      $   0.03      $  (0.08)      $  (0.03)
</TABLE>

                                       22
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-01-2000
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 46 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 46

      Honoring Future Business Leaders of America-Phi Beta Lambda.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 9, 1999

   Mr. Blunt (for himself, Mr. Clay, and Mr. Skelton) submitted the 
following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Education 
                           and the Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
      Honoring Future Business Leaders of America-Phi Beta Lambda.

Whereas Future Business Leaders of America-Phi Beta Lambda (FBLA-PBL) is a 
        nonprofit educational organization the first chapter of which was 
        established in Johnson City, Tennessee, in 1942;
Whereas after years of expansion nationwide, FBLA-PBL has more than 250,000 
        members who are students in junior high schools, high schools, colleges, 
        universities, vocational/technical schools, and private business 
        schools;
Whereas FBLA-PBL is dedicated to bringing the business and education communities 
        together in a positive working relationship through innovative 
        leadership and career development programs;
Whereas members of FBLA-PBL perform community service activities and strive to 
        build their understanding of the realities of the modern business world;
Whereas the divisions of FBLA-PBL include Future Business Leaders of America, 
        which teaches high school students basic business and leadership 
        principles, and Phi Beta Lambda, which helps university, college, 
        vocational, technical, and business school students make the transition 
        from school to work; and
Whereas many efforts are being made throughout the Nation to celebrate the week 
        beginning February 7, 1999, as National Future Business Leaders of 
        America-Phi Beta Lambda Week, and to use such week as an opportunity to 
        inform and educate the people of the United States regarding the 
        organization and its activities: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) honors Future Business Leaders of America-Phi Beta 
        Lambda; and
            (2) supports the efforts being made throughout the Nation 
        to inform and educate the people of the United States regarding 
        FBLA-PBL and its activities.
                                 <all>
```
|                                      |
|--------------------------------------|
|                                      |  |
| Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas | BNY Mellon Trust of Delaware |
| As Indenture Trustee                 | As Owner Trustee |
| Attn:  Michelle H.Y. Voon  | Attn:  Robert Castle / Kristine Gullo |
| 100 Plaza One 6th Floor         | 100 White Clay Center, Suite 102 |
| Jersey City, NY 07311                | Newark, DE  19711 |

|                                                 |
|-------------------------------------------------|
|                                                 |  |
| The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A. | Ally Auto Assets LLC |
| Attn:  Robert Castle                  | Ally Financial Inc. |
| 2 North LaSalle Street, Suite 1020              | 200 Renaissance Center |
| Chicago, IL  60602                    | 12th Floor, MC 482-B12-C24 |
|                                            | Detroit, MI |

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |
| Re:    | Ally Auto Receivables Trust 2012-2 |
|   | Annual Statement as to Compliance |

|    |
|----|
|    |  |
| a. | A review of the activities of the Servicer during the period of March 14, 2012 through December 31, 2012, and of its performance under the Servicing Agreement has been under his supervision, and |

|    |
|----|
|    |  |
| b. | To the best of his knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Servicing Agreement throughout such period. |

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |  |
|   | Very truly yours, |
|   |   |
|   | /s/ David J. DeBrunner |   |
|   | David J. DeBrunner |
|   | Vice President, Controller and Chief Accounting Officer |
|   | Ally Financial Inc. |
### §7460. Cadets: charges and fees for attendance; limitation

(a) Prohibition.—Except as provided in subsection (b), no charge or fee for tuition, room, or board for attendance at the Academy may be imposed unless the charge or fee is specifically authorized by a law enacted after October 5, 1994.

(b) Exception.—The prohibition specified in subsection (a) does not apply with respect to any item or service provided to cadets for which a charge or fee is imposed as of October 5, 1994. The Secretary of Defense shall notify Congress of any change made by the Academy in the amount of a charge or fee authorized under this subsection.

(Added Pub. L. 108–375, div. A, title V, §545(a)(1), Oct. 28, 2004, 118 Stat. 1908, §4360; renumbered §7460, Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, §808(c)(1), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1839.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–232 renumbered section 4360 of this title as this section.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2018 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 115–232 effective Feb. 1, 2019, with provision for the coordination of amendments and special rule for certain redesignations, see section 800 of Pub. L. 115–232, set out as a note preceding section 3001 of this title.
04/02/201 0 10:1 4 FA X 202493514 2 FA A • > DM S 001/00 1

^ FOCC 6 Corporat e l-leadqucirter s

CUSTOMIZE D TAST E TECHNOLOG Y

Februar y 23 , 201 0 V U FEDERA LEXPRES S Hcariu g Docke t Federal Aviatio n Administratio n 60 0 Independenc e Avenue , S W Wilbur Wright Buildin g - Suite 2W100 0 Washington , D C 2059 1 ^ Attention : Hearin g Docke t Cler k - AG C - 43 0 £f//^J/l''/to 3 : ? : '• : 2 m t, ' 

# ^i^/o-0f9? ^ Re : Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n ("FAA" ) Reques t fo r Hearin g Cas e No . 200 9 S W70027 2 Dea r Sir o r Madam : Thi s letter

serve s a s Newly Wed s Foods , Inc/ s ("NWF" ) reques t fo r ahearin g i n respons e l o th e FAA' s Final Notic e o f Propose dCivi l Penalt

y i n th e above-captione dmatter (th e "Request") . Th e Reques t i s sent pursuan t t o 1 4 CFT

^ 13.16(1) . Pleas e do no t

hesitat e t o contac t

me i f I ca n provid e you o r another FA A representativ e vk'it

hany additional information .

Ver y trul y yours , NEWL Y WED S FOODS , INC . Joh n J . Seely Senio r Vic e Presiden t JJS/tw

ce : Jame s Archier , Esq . Georg e Wincheste r

'11^ 0 W rulleiTOFTAvc . • Chicago , Illinoi s 6063 9 • 771'18 9 700 0 • f;:ix773'1^ 9 279 9 • \AA/VW.newlywecl.Ttoodr.co m
# C_2006224EN.01003501.xml

| 16.9.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 224/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.9.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 224/35

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 10 July 2006 — La Baronia de Turis v OHIM — Baron Philippe de Rothschild (LA BARONNIE)

(Case T-323/03) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community word mark LA BARONNIE - Previous national word mark BARONIA - Proof of use of earlier mark - Evidence produced for the first time before the Board of Appeal - Admissibility - Scope of the examination conducted by the Boards of Appeal - Articles 62 and 74 of Regulation (EC) No 40/94)

(2006/C 224/75)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: La Baronia de Turis, Cooperativa Valenciana (Turis, Spain) (represented by: J. Carreño Moreno, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: S. Petrequin and A. Folliard-Monguiral, Agents)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the Court of First Instance: Baron Philippe de Rothschild SA (Pauillac, France) (represented by: K. Manhaeve, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the Court of First Instance:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 9 July 2003 (R 57/2003-2) concerning the opposition proceedings between Baronia de Turis, Cooperativa Valenciana and Baron Philippe de Rothschild SA

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 9 July 2003 (Case R 57/2003-2); |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 9 July 2003 (Case R 57/2003-2);

| 2. | Dismisses as inadmissible the application of the applicant, La Baronia de Turis, Cooperativa Valenciana, seeking refusal to register the Community trade mark in question; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses as inadmissible the application of the applicant, La Baronia de Turis, Cooperativa Valenciana, seeking refusal to register the Community trade mark in question;

| 3. | Dismisses the application of the intervener, Baron Philipe de Rothschild SA, that the opposition be declared inadmissible, in so far as it is based on Article 8(4) of Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 of 20 December 1993 on the Community trade mark; |
| --- | --- |

3.

Dismisses the application of the intervener, Baron Philipe de Rothschild SA, that the opposition be declared inadmissible, in so far as it is based on Article 8(4) of Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 of 20 December 1993 on the Community trade mark;

| 4. | Dismisses the action as to the remainder. |
| --- | --- |

4.

Dismisses the action as to the remainder.

---

(1)  OJ C 275, 15.11.2003.

1

---
#### JUDY SANDVIG ET AL. *v.*A. DUBREUIL AND SONS, INC., ET AL.

(SC 16781)

Sullivan, C. J., and Norcott, Katz, Vertefeuille and Zarella, Js.

Argued May 19

officially released July 13, 2004

*91*Donald R. Beebe,*for the appellants (plaintiffs).

*Michael S. Burrell,*for the appellee (named defendant).

*Opinion*

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiffs, Judy Sandvig and Karl Sandvig, appeal, following our grant of certification, from the judgment of the Appellate Court affirming the judgment of the trial court in favor of the named defendant, A. Dubreuil & Sons, Inc. *Sandvig*v. *A. Dubreuil & Sons, Inc.,*68 Conn. App. 79, 789 A.2d 1012 (2002). At issue is whether the plaintiffs’ negligence and contract claims against the named defendant are barred by the applicable statutes of limitations. See General Statutes § 52-584 (providing two year statute of limitations on negligence actions); General Statutes § 52-576 (providing six year statute of limitations on contract actions). We granted the plaintiffs’ petition for certification to appeal limited to the following issue: “Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that: (1) with respect to the plaintiffs’ negligence count, the relation back doctrine did not apply; (2) with respect to the plaintiffs’ contract count, the relation back doctrine did not apply; and (3) the statute of limitations applicable to the plaintiffs’ causes of action was not tolled by the named defendant’s bankruptcy proceedings?” *Sandvig*v. *A. Dubreuil & Sons, Inc.,*260 Conn. 931, 799 A.2d 296 (2002).

After examining the entire record on appeal and considering the briefs and oral arguments of the parties, we have determined that the appeal in this case should *92be dismissed on the ground that certification was improvidently granted.

The appeal is dismissed.