alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 167.11 Tenure of grazing permits. ( a ) All active regular grazing permits shall be for one year and shall be automatically renewed annually until terminated. Any Navajo eligible to hold a grazing permit as defined in § 167.8 may become a livestock operator by obtaining an active grazing permit through negotiability or inheritance or both.
( b ) In many Districts, and portions of all districts, unused grazing permits or portions of grazing permits are beneficial in aiding range recovery. Each District Grazing Committee will handle each matter of unused grazing permit or portions of grazing permits on individual merits. Where ample forage is available operators will be encouraged to fill their permits with livestock or dispose of their unused permits through negotiability. In those areas where forage is in need of rehabilitation permittees will not be encouraged to stock to their permitted numbers until the range has sufficiently recovered to justify the grazing of additional livestock.
```

 EX-34.3
(logo) Grant Thornton

Audit . Tax . Advisory

Grant Thornton LLP
201 South College Street
Suite 2500
Charlotte, NC 28244

T 704.632.3500

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
```

```

Board of Directors

TriMont Real Estate Advisors, Inc

We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying
Management's Certification Regarding Compliance with Applicable Servicing
Criteria ("Management's Report"), that TriMont Real Estate Advisors, Inc (the
"Company") complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission's Regulation AB as of and for the year
ended December 31, 2012, except for those criteria noted as not applicable
(N/A) within Exhibit A. The transactions covered by this report are only those
transactions processed by the Company in its capacity as trust, senior trust or
operating advisor for the asset backed securities transactions (the "Platform").
Reference Exhibit B for the transactions covered by this examination.
Management is responsible for the Company's compliance with the applicable
servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's
assertion about the Company's compliance with the applicable servicing criteria
for the Platform based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public
Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included
examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the
applicable servicing criteria for the Platform and performing such other
procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination
included testing selected asset-backed transactions and securities constituting
the Platform and evaluating whether the Company performed servicing activities
related to those transactions and securities in compliance with the applicable
servicing criteria for the period covered by this report. Accordingly, our
testing may not have included servicing activities related to each asset-backed
transaction or security constituting the Platform. Further, our examination was
not designed to detect material noncompliance that may have occurred prior to
the period covered by this report and that may have affected the Company's
servicing activities during the period covered by this report. We believe that
our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination
does not provide a legal determination on the Company's compliance with the
applicable servicing criteria.

1
```

----

```

 (page)

In our opinion, management's assertion that Trimont Real Estate Advisors, Inc
complied with the applicable servicing criteria identified in Exhibit A and
Exhibit B as of and for the year ended December 31, 2012 for the Platform is
fairly stated, in all material respects.

Charlotte, North Carolina

/s/ Grant Thornton LLP

March 1, 2013

2
```
§ 247.7 Can I build a structure? ( a ) You may not build any structures at the sites except as allowed under paragraph (d) of this section .
( b ) You may use the camping facilities that have been constructed at the sites.
( c ) In addition to these structures, you may camp in tents, tepees, campers, and mobile trailers. You must remove any tents, tepees, campers, temporary drying sheds, and mobile trailers from the sites at any time you are not actively engaged in fishing, drying fish, or processing fish by other means, and during the time a site is closed for maintenance.
( d ) Where the Area Director has designated areas for the construction of temporary drying sheds, you may construct a temporary drying shed where space is available. You must remove any temporary drying shed you build.
( e ) If you erect or maintain a structure in violation of this section, the Area Director may order it removed at any time.
( f ) The Area Director: ( 1 ) Is not required to notify you before removing the structure; and
( 2 ) Will charge you the cost of disposing of the structure.
§ 169.107 Must I obtain tribal or individual Indian landowner consent for a right-of-way across Indian land? ( a ) For a right-of-way across tribal land, the applicant must obtain tribal consent, in the form of a tribal authorization and a written agreement with the tribe, if the tribe so requires, to a grant of right-of-way across tribal land. The consent document may impose restrictions or conditions; any restrictions or conditions automatically become conditions and restrictions in the grant.
( b ) For a right-of-way across individually owned Indian land, the applicant must notify all individual Indian landowners and, except as provided in paragraph (b)(1) of this section, must obtain written consent from the owners of the majority interest in each tract affected by the grant of right-of-way. ( 1 ) We may issue the grant of right-of-way without the consent of any of the individual Indian owners if all of the following conditions are met: ( i ) The owners of interests in the land are so numerous that it would be impracticable to obtain consent as defined in paragraph (c) of this section;
( ii ) We determine the grant will cause no substantial injury to the land or any landowner, based on factors including, but not limited to, the reasonableness of the term of the grant, the amount of acreage involved in the grant, the disturbance to land that will result from the grant, the type of activity to be conducted under the grant, the potential for environmental or safety impacts resulting from the grant, and any objections raised by landowners;
( iii ) We determine that all of the landowners will be adequately compensated for consideration and any damages that may arise from a grant of right-of-way; and
( iv ) We provide notice of our intent to issue the grant of right-of-way to all of the owners at least 60 days prior to the date of the grant using the procedures in § 169.12, and provide landowners with 30 days to object.
( 2 ) For the purposes of this section, the owners of interests in the land are so numerous that it would be impracticable to obtain consent, if there are 50 or more co-owners of undivided trust or restricted interests.
( 3 ) Successors are bound by consent granted by their predecessors-in-interest.
( c ) We will determine the number of owners of, and undivided interests in, a fractionated tract of Indian land, for the purposes of calculating the requisite consent based on our records on the date on which the application is submitted to us.
EX-34.4
(logo) pwc


Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Board of Directors, PNC Financial Services Group, Inc.:

We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying Report on
Assessment of Compliance with Regulation AB Servicing Criteria, that Midland
Loan Services, a division of PNC Bank, National Association ("Midland" or the
"Company") complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the
Securities and Exchange Commission's Regulation AB for the commercial
mortgage-backed securities transactions (the "Platform"), as of December 31,
2013 and for the year then ended, excluding criteria 1122(d)(1)(iii),
1122(d)(3)(i)(B), 1122(d)(3)(i)(C), 1122(d)(3)(i)(D), 1122(d)(3)(ii),
1122(d)(3)(iii), 1122(d)(3)(iv), and 1122(d)(4)(xv), which the Company has
determined are not applicable to the servicing activities performed by it with
respect to the Platform. Management is responsible for the Company's compliance
with the servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on
management's assertion based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly,
included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance
with the applicable servicing criteria and performing such other procedures as
we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing
of selected asset-backed transactions and securities that comprise the Platform,
testing of selected servicing activities related to the Platform, and
determining whether the Company processed those selected transactions and
performed those selected activities in compliance with the applicable servicing
criteria. Our procedures were limited to the selected transactions and servicing
activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report.
Our procedures were not designed to detect noncompliance arising from errors
that may have occurred prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have
affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during
the period covered by this report. We believe that our examination provides a
reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal
determination on the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria.

In our opinion, management's assertion that Midland complied with the
aforementioned applicable servicing criteria as of and for the year ended
December 31, 2013 for the Platform is fairly stated, in all material respects.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

February 24, 2014


PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, 1100 Walnut, Suite 1300, Kansas City, MO 64106
T: (816) 472 7921, F: (816) 218 1890, www.pwc.com/us
EXHIBIT 31.1

                        CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION
                          302 OF THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT

I, Roy Piceni, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Satellite Newspapers
Corp.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and



                                       Date:  December 1, 2005

                                       /s/ Roy Piceni
                                       -----------------------
                                       Roy Piceni,
                                       President, CEO
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Global Crossing Limited (the registrant) on Form 10-Q for the period
ending September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the report), I, John J. Legere, Chief Executive Officer, of the registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



(1) The report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant.



Date: November 15, 2004



|                                      
|--------------------------------------
|                                      
|/s/    JOHN J. LEGERE                 
|John J. Legere Chief Executive Officer



3
§ 225.39 Fees. ( a ) Unless otherwise authorized by the Secretary, each minerals agreement or assignment thereof, shall be accompanied by a filing fee of $75.00 at the time of filing.
( b ) An Indian mineral owner shall not be required to pay a filing fee if the Indian mineral owner, pursuant to a provision in the existing minerals agreement, acquires an additional interest in that minerals agreement.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

# PACOM Joint Humanitarian Assistance Survey Team Deployed to Nepal

U.S. Pacific Command continues to workclosely with the U.S. Embassy in Nepal and U.S. Agency for InternationalDevelopment colleagues to determine how USPACOM forces and assets can assistthe Government of Nepal in the aftermath of this disaster.  The U.S. military has transported members ofthe USAID Disaster Assistance Response Team and urban search and rescue teamsto Nepal, and also sending a Joint Humanitarian Assistance Survey Team (HAST)of approximately 20 individuals to Nepal in support of the USAID/OFDA DisasterAssistance Response Team (DART). The Joint HAST is expected to be in Nepal onApril 30th (Nepal local time) and will be led by Marine Brig. Gen. Paul Kennedy,Commander of 3rd Marine Expeditionary Brigade will lead the team. The HAST willhelp coordinate the response to USAID/OFDA validated requests from theGovernment of Nepal in coordination with the Embassy in Kathmandu.

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More News/Articles
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 35 (Tuesday, February 22, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 9807]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-3827]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

U.S. Customs and Border Protection


Accreditation and Approval of Saybolt LP, as a Commercial Gauger 
and Laboratory

AGENCY: U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Department of Homeland 
Security.

ACTION: Notice of accreditation and approval of Saybolt LP, as a 
commercial gauger and laboratory.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to 19 CFR 151.12 and 19 
CFR 151.13, Saybolt LP, 2610 S. Federal Highway, Fort Lauderdale, FL 
33316, has been approved to gauge and accredited to test petroleum and 
petroleum products for customs purposes in accordance with the 
provisions of 19 CFR 151.12 and 19 CFR 151.13. Anyone wishing to employ 
this entity to conduct laboratory analyses and gauger services should 
request and receive written assurances from the entity that it is 
accredited or approved by the U.S. Customs and Border Protection to 
conduct the specific test or gauger service requested. Alternatively, 
inquires regarding the specific test or gauger service this entity is 
accredited or approved to perform may be directed to the U.S. Customs 
and Border Protection by calling (202) 344-1060. The inquiry may also 
be sent to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#543736247a3835363c2514303c277a333b22"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="e5868795cb8984878d94a5818d96cb828a93">[email protected]</span></a>. Please reference the Web site listed 
below for a complete listing of CBP approved gaugers and accredited 
laboratories. http://cbp.gov/xp/cgov/import/operations_support/labs_scientific_svcs/commercial_gaugers/.

DATES: The accreditation and approval of Saybolt LP, as commercial 
gauger and laboratory became effective on August 24, 2010. The next 
triennial inspection date will be scheduled for August 2013.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Anthony Malana, Laboratories and 
Scientific Services, U.S. Customs and Border Protection, 1300 
Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Suite 1500N, Washington, DC 20229, 202-344-
1060.

    Dated: February 10, 2011.
Ira S. Reese,
Executive Director, Laboratories and Scientific Services.
[FR Doc. 2011-3827 Filed 2-18-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-14-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### § 168.4 Establishment of range units.

The Area Director will use Soil and Range Inventory data to establish range units on the Hopi Partitioned Area to provide for a surface land management program to restore the land to its full grazing potential and maintain that potential to the maximum extent feasible. The establishment of range units on Hopi Partitioned Lands is subject to the concurrence of the Hopi Tribe in accordance with § 168.17 of these regulations.
Exhibit 35.1

 

ANNUAL SERVICER’S COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATE

 

This Compliance Certificateis furnished pursuant to Section 4.10 of the Sale and Servicing Agreement (the “Agreement”), dated as of March 7, 2012,by and among Hyundai Auto Receivables Trust 2012-A, Hyundai Capital America, as seller and servicer (the “Servicer”),Hyundai ABS Funding, LLC (formerly known as Hyundai ABS Funding Corporation), as depositor, and Citibank, N.A., as indenture trusteeand Item 1123 of Regulation AB. The undersigned hereby certifies that:

 

1)         Iam a duly authorized officer of the Servicer.

 

2)         Areview of the activities of the Servicer from January 1, 2015 through December 31, 2015 (the “Relevant Period”) andof the Servicer’s performance under the Agreement during the Relevant Period has been made under my supervision.

 

3)         Basedon such review, the Servicer has, to the best of my knowledge, fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all materialrespects throughout the Relevant Period.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have duly executed thisCompliance Certificate this 18th day of March, 2016.
From: Richard Parker [mailto:richardparkerdc@gmail.com] 

Sent: Thursday, December 22, 2011 2:04 PM 

To: Vijay Tendulkar; Brian Coffey; Thomas Patzner; Rob Greeson; Bob Smith; Michael Rivest; Eduardo 

Robles 

Subject: LV Transformer Reg-Neg: Revised Table of Efficiencies 

Colleagues, 

Attached for your review is a helpful table supplied by Tom Patzner at Scheider Electric setting 

forth the essential terms of a possible counter-offer on low-voltage transformers -- the one SE 

has been talking about. 

All best, 

Richard
EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14/15d-14(d)

OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

I, SEAN B. BAKER certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on
Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Cabelas Credit Card Master Note Trust (the Exchange
Act periodic reports);

2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicers and based on my knowledge and the compliance reviews conducted in
preparing the servicer compliance statements required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing
agreements in all material respects; and

5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this
report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as
otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated party: U.S. Bank
National Association.

Dated: March 30, 2016



/s/ Sean B. BakerSean B. Baker, President (senior officer in
charge of securitization of WFB Funding, LLC)