alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §828. Art. 28. Detail or employment of reporters and interpreters

Under such regulations as the Secretary concerned may prescribe, the convening authority of a court-martial, military commission, or court of inquiry shall detail or employ qualified court reporters, who shall record the proceedings of and testimony taken before that court or commission. Under like regulations the convening authority of a court-martial, military commission, or court of inquiry may detail or employ interpreters who shall interpret for the court or commission. This section does not apply to a military commission established under chapter 47A of this title.

(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 47; Pub. L. 109–366, §4(a)(2), Oct. 17, 2006, 120 Stat. 2631.)

| Revised section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 828 | 50:592. | May 5, 1950, ch. 169, §1 (Art. 28), 64 Stat. 117. |

The words "Secretary concerned" are substituted for the words "Secretary of the Department". The words, "detail or employ" are substituted for the word "appoint", since the filling of the position involved is not appointment to an office in the constitutional sense.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2006—Pub. L. 109–366 inserted last sentence.
**Exhibit 34.2**

 

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

 

The Board of Directors U.S. Bank National Association

 

We have examined management’s assertion, including the accompanying Report on Assessment of Compliance with Applicable Servicing Criteria, that U.S. Bank National Association (the Company) complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122 (d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB for the Corporate Trust Asset-Backed Securities Platform (the Platform), for which the Company provides trustee, registrar, paying agent, and securities administrator services, as of October 31, 2013, and for the period from November 1, 2012 through October 31, 2013, except for servicing criteria 1122 (d)(1)(i)-(iv), 1122 (d)(2)(i), 1122 (d)(2)(iii), 1122 (d)(2)(vi)-(vii), 1122 (d)(3)(i), and 1122 (d)(4)(i)-(xv), which the Company has determined are not applicable to the activities performed by them with respect to the servicing platform covered by this report. Management is responsible for the Company’s compliance with those servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management’s assertion about the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria based on our examination.

 

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, as adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company’s compliance with the applicable servicing criteria and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing of less than all of the individual asset-backed transactions and securities that comprise the Platform, testing of less than all of the servicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whether the Company processed those selected transactions and performed those selected activities in compliance with the servicing criteria. Furthermore, our procedures were limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report. Our procedures were not designed to determine whether errors may have occurred either prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report for the selected transactions or any other transactions. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria.

 

In our opinion, management’s assertion that the Company complied with the aforementioned servicing criteria as of October 31, 2013, and for the period from November 1, 2012 through October 31, 2013, for the Corporate Trust Asset-Backed Securities Platform is fairly stated, in all material respects.

 
|   | /s/ Ernst & Young LLP |
|--------|--------------------------------|

 

 

January 8, 2014

 

----
#### § 18.302 How does the tribe request approval for the single heir rule?

The tribe must follow the same procedures as for submitting a tribal probate code to the Department for approval.
Exhibit 23.1







Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm




We consent to the use in this Annual Report on Form 40-F of Just Energy Group Inc.(the “Company”) of our reports dated May 14, 2015, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of the Company as at March 31, 2015 and 2014, and for the years ended March 31, 2015 and 2014, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of the Company as at March 31, 2015, included herein.




We also consent to the incorporation by reference of such reports into the Company’s outstanding registration statements on Form F-3 (No. 333-188184) and Form S-8  (No. 333-183954 and No. 333-200194) that have been filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.





/s/ Ernst & Young LLPToronto, Canada,



Chartered AccountantsJune 2, 2015



Licensed Public Accountants
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Penalties for failure to reportand false reporting of child abuse and neglect: current through...**
 
2013 | 2015
 
SuDoc Number:HE 23.1210:R 29/4/
Item Number:0445-L-01 (online)
CGP systemNumber:001039942
 
February 26, 2018
#### § 111.4 Election of shareholders.

An Indian holding equal rights in two or more tribes can share in payments to only one of them and will be required to elect with which tribe he wishes to be enrolled and to relinquish in writing his claims to payments to the other. In the case of a minor the election will be made by the parent or guardian.
**P art II, Section A**  **, Item 1/d –**  **Process Description -**  **Manufacturing Raw Material**  **CA S #**  **Year 1 Year 3** 

**Total Liquid k**  **gs** Reactants are charged to R20 00 (or K500F) reactor.
**REA CTOR** 

**RECEIVER**

**FILTER**

**FILLING** ( 5 gallon pails and 55 gallon drums ) **1**

**3 2**
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 114 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                        March 17, 1999.
    Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it shall be in order 
without intervention of any point of order to consider in the House the bill 
(H.R. 975) to provide for a reduction in the volume of steel imports, and to 
establish a steel import notification and monitoring program. The bill shall be 
considered as read for amendment. The previous question shall be considered as 
ordered on the bill to final passage without intervening motion except: (1) 
ninety minutes of debate equally divided and controlled by the chairman and 
ranking minority member of the Committee on Ways and Means; and (2) one motion 
to recommit.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
EXHIBIT
31.2



Rule
13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification



I,
Michael Malone, certify that:



|1. | I
    have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019 of SRAX, Inc.;                                                                                                                                                                                        
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       
|2. | Based
    on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
    to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect
    to the period covered by this report;



|Dated:
    May 13, 2020 | /s/
        Michael Malone                                                                 
|----------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                        | Michael
        Malone, Chief Financial Officer, principal financial and accounting officer
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News

51st FW stands up innovation cellDecember 29, 2023 — With prioritizing innovation at the forefront of its strategic objectives, the 51st Fighter Wing marked a significant milestone by standing up its new wing innovation cell, the MustangWERX office, at Osan Air Base, Republic of Korea, Nov. 22, 2023... MORE 

----

2024 (325)2023 (825)2022 (1193)2021 (1066)2020 (1083)2019 (1166)2018 (1116)2017 (1356)2016 (1475)2015 (1408)2014 (904)2013 (32)2012 (4)

About DoDDoD CareersJoin the MilitaryNewsUSA.govPhotos & VideosPrivacy & SecurityTop Issues

US INDOPACOM Inspector GeneralDoD Inspector General Accessibility/Section 508DoD FOIAUS INDOPACOM FOIALink DisclaimerNo FEAR ActRecovery ActINDOPACOM Webmaster

                  - Facebook
                  - X
                  - YouTube
                  - Instagram
                  - RSS

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
### §12525. Benefit amounts

(a) Basic Benefit.—The basic benefit for an insured member under the insurance program is $1,000 per month (as adjusted under subsection (d)).

(b) Reduced and Enhanced Benefits.—Under the regulations prescribed by the Secretary, a person enrolled for coverage under the insurance program may elect—

(1) a reduced coverage benefit equal to one-half the amount of the basic benefit; or

(2) an enhanced benefit in the amount of $1,500, $2,000, $2,500, $3,000, $3,500, $4,000, $4,500, or $5,000 per month (as adjusted under subsection (d)).

(c) Amount for Partial Month.—The amount of insurance payable to an insured member for any period of covered service that is less than one month shall be determined by multiplying 1/30 of the monthly benefit rate for the member by the number of days of the covered service served by the member during such period.

(d) Adjustment of Amounts.—(1) The Secretary shall determine annually the effect of inflation on benefits and shall adjust the amounts set forth in subsections (a) and (b)(2) to maintain the constant dollar value of the benefit.

(2) If the amount of a benefit as adjusted under paragraph (1) is not evenly divisible by $10, the amount shall be rounded to the nearest multiple of $10, except that an amount evenly divisible by $5 but not by $10 shall be rounded to the next lower amount that is evenly divisible by $10.

(Added Pub. L. 104–106, div. A, title V, §512(a)(1), Feb. 10, 1996, 110 Stat. 301.)
#### § 167.1 Authority.

It is within the authority of the Secretary of the Interior to protect Indian tribal lands against waste. Subject to regulations of this part, the right exists for Indian tribes to authorize the granting of permits upon their tribal lands and to prescribe by appropriate tribal action the conditions under which their lands may be used.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-1993

JOYCE E. ROWLEY, Plaintiff - Appellant,

v. CITY OF NORTH MYRTLE BEACH; JOEL DAVIS, Individually and in his capacity as employee of the City of North Myrtle Beach; KEVIN BLAYTON, Individually and in his capacity as employee of the City of North Myrtle Beach; JOHN SMITHSON, Individually and in his capacity as employee of the City of North Myrtle Beach; PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR FOR THE CITY OF NORTH MYRTLE BEACH; CATHY E. MADDOCK, Personal Representative of the Estate of Douglas Maddock, personal representative Douglas Maddock, Defendants - Appellees.

No. 09-2001

JOYCE E. ROWLEY, Plaintiff - Appellant,

v. NORTH MYRTLE BEACH, CITY OF; JOHN SMITHSON, City Manager, Individually and in his representative capacity as employee of the City of North Myrtle Beach; JOEL DAVIS, Assistant City Manager, Individually and in his representative capacity as employee of the City of North Myrtle Beach; KEVIN BLAYTON, Public Works Director, Individually and in his representative capacity as employee of the City of North Myrtle Beach; PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR FOR THE CITYOF NORTH MYRTLE BEACH; CATHY E. MADDOCK, Personal Representative of the Estate of Douglas Maddock, personal representative Douglas Maddock, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Terry L. Wooten, District Judge. (4:07-cv-01636-TLW; 4:06-cv-01873-TLW)

Submitted: December 2, 2009 Decided: December 16, 2009

Before WILKINSON and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Joyce E. Rowley, Appellant Pro Se. Derwood Lorraine Aydlette, III, Christopher Wofford Johnson, GIGNILLIAT, SAVITZ & BETTIS, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

23 PER CURIAM: In these consolidated appeals, Joyce Rowley appeals the district court’s orders adopting the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation and dismis sing her two consolidated

cases. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s orders and affirm for the reasons cited by the district court.

See Rowley v. City of N. Myrtle Beach , Nos. 4:06-cv-01873-TLWTER; 4:07-cv-01636-TLW-TER (D.S.C. Aug. 21, 2009). We agree with the district court that Rowley’s dilatory conduct during the course of the proceedings and willful disregard of the court’s orders, specifically her failure to appear for depositions, warranted dismissal and an order that she pay attorneys’ fees and costs related to the depositions. We have considered Rowley’s arguments concerning other court orders issued during the course of the proceedings and find her arguments to be without merit and that, in most instances, the issues related to those orders had no bearing on the court’s decision to dismiss the cases. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
# C_2014056EN.01000101.xml

| 27.2.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 56/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.2.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 56/1

---

Invitation to submit comments on the draft Commission Regulation amending Regulation (EC) No 906/2009 on liner shipping consortia as regards its period of application

2014/C 56/01

Interested parties may submit their comments within one month of the date of publication of this draft Regulation to:

| European Commission |
| --- |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Antitrust Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |
| E-mail: COMP-GREFFE-ANTITRUST@ec.europa.eu |

European Commission

Directorate-General for Competition

Antitrust Registry

1049 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

E-mail: COMP-GREFFE-ANTITRUST@ec.europa.eu

The text is also available on the following website: http://ec.europa.eu/competition/consultations/2014_maritime_consortia/index_en.html

---
#### § 227.7 Additional information from applicant.

The superintendent may, either before or after approval of a lease, call for any additional information desired to carry out the regulations in this part. If a lessee shall fail to furnish the papers necessary to put his lease and bond in proper form for consideration, the superintendent shall forward such lease for disapproval.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Yakob Benshimon, Appellant.

[823 NYS2d 905]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (D’Emic, J.), rendered April 30, 2003, convicting him of murder in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the failure of defense counsel to present a defense of extreme emotional disturbance did not constitute ineffective assistance of counsel *(see People v Caban,*5 NY3d 143, 152 [2005]; *People v Soto,*276 AD2d 810 [2000]; *People v Feris,*144 AD2d 691 [1988]; *People v Knights,*109 AD2d 910 [1985]). Florio, J.P., Krausman, Mastro and Covello, JJ., concur.
#### § 162.016 Will BIA comply with tribal laws in making lease decisions?

Unless contrary to Federal law, BIA will comply with tribal laws in making decisions regarding leases, including tribal laws regulating activities on leased land under tribal jurisdiction, including, but not limited to, tribal laws relating to land use, environmental protection, and historic or cultural preservation.
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 01-3139

___________

William Frank Jones, Jr., *

*

Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* Eastern District of Arkansas.

Dale West, Deputy Prosecuting *

Attorney, Jefferson County, Arkansas, *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Defendant, *

*

J. Zuber, Detective, Pine Bluff Police *

Department; K. L. Sergeant, Detective, *

Pine Bluff Police Department; Dick *

Madsen, Detective, Pine Bluff Police *

Department, originally sued as Dick *

Madson; J. P. Harrell, Detective, Pine *

Bluff Police Department; Calhoun, *

Detective, Pine Bluff Police *

Department; John Does, 1 - aka Agent *

1093, aka Dilipkiman Petal (owner) *

and John Doe 2 - aka (Owner) Foster *

Towing & Recovery, Inc., John Doe 3 *

and John Doe 4 - aka Manager, Motel *

65, *

*

Appellees, *

*

Berlin Jones, Circuit Judge of Jefferson *

County, Arkansas; Betty Dickey, Ex- *

Prosecuting Attorney, Jefferson County, *
1

The Honorable Garnett Thomas Eisele, United States District Judge for the

Eastern District of Arkansas.

-2-

Arkansas; Steven Dalrylmple, *

Prosecuting Attorney, Jefferson *

County, Arkansas; Fred D. Davis, III, *

Hon., Circuit/Chancery Judge, *

Jefferson County, Arkansas, *

*

Defendants, *

*

Brenda Hardin, Deputy-Clerk, *

Jefferson County Circuit Court Clerk’s *

Office, *

*

Appellee. *

___________

 Submitted: October 3, 2002

 Filed: October 8, 2002

___________

Before WOLLMAN, MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, and MELLOY, Circuit

Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Arkansas inmate William Frank Jones appeals following the district court’s1

dismissals and adverse grant of summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action.

Upon careful de novo review, see Schaller Tel. Co. v. Golden Sky Sys., 298 F.3d 736,

740 (8th Cir. 2002) (Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6)); Kelly v. Kluck, 249 F.3d 773, 777 (8th

Cir. 2001) (summary judgment), we conclude that the district court did not err in

dismissing some claims and granting summary judgment on others. We further
-3-

conclude the district court did not abuse its discretion in refusing to enter default

judgment, and in denying Jones a pretrial hearing.

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. Jones’s motions for appointment

of counsel and for transfer to another prison are denied.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Airborne Artillery Warms Up Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson Winter Nights 

By Staff Sgt. Daniel Love

                JOINT BASE ELMENDORF-RICHARDSON, Alaska  –              

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT
#### § 162.537 [Reserved]
Editorial Note on Part 23
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 23 appear at 79 FR 27190, May 13, 2014.

§ 23.115 How are petitions for transfer of a proceeding made? ( a ) Either parent, the Indian custodian, or the Indian child's Tribe may request, at any time, orally on the record or in writing, that the State court transfer a foster-care or termination-of-parental-rights proceeding to the jurisdiction of the child's Tribe.
( b ) The right to request a transfer is available at any stage in each foster-care or termination-of-parental-rights proceeding.