alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 99.5



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of
Brookfield Canada Office Properties (the “Company”) on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2011, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, T. Jan Sucharda, President and Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|By:    /s/ T. Jan Sucharda______________________
        T. Jan Sucharda
        President and Chief Executive Officer
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





March 30, 2012





11
#### § 30.118 When should the tribal governing body or school board request technical assistance?

A tribal governing body or school board may request technical assistance in writing at any time. A tribal governing body or school board is welcomed and encouraged to request technical assistance before formally notifying the Secretary of its intention to waive the requirements established by the Secretary in order to maximize the time available for technical assistance.
Home > Apply for Grants > Confirmation

Confirmation

Thank you for submitting your grant application package via Grants.gov. Your application is 

currently being processed by the Grants.gov system. Once your submission has been processed, 

Grants.gov will send email messages to advise you of the progress of your application through the 

system. Over the next 24 to 48 hours, you should receive two emails. The first will confirm receipt 

of your application by the Grants.gov system, and the second will indicate that the application has 

either been successfully validated by the system prior to transmission to the grantor agency or has 

been rejected due to errors.

Please do not hit the back button on your browser.

If your application is successfully validated and subsequently retrieved by the grantor agency from 

the Grants.gov system, you will receive an additional email. This email may be delivered several 

days or weeks from the date of submission, depending on when the grantor agency retrieves it.

You may also monitor the processing status of your submission within the Grants.gov system by 

clicking on the “Track My Application” link listed at the end of this form.

Note: Once the grantor agency has retrieved your application from Grants.gov, you will need to 

contact them directly for any subsequent status updates. Grants.gov does not participate in 

making any award decisions.

IMPORTANT NOTICE: If you do not receive a receipt confirmation and either a validation 

confirmation or a rejection email message within 48 hours, please contact us. The Grants.gov Contact 

Center can be reached by email at support@grants.gov, or by telephone at 1-800-518-4726. Always 

include your Grants.gov tracking number in all correspondence. The tracking numbers issued by 

Grants.gov look like GRANTXXXXXXXXX. 
Contact Center hours of operation are Monday-Friday from 7:00 A.M. to 9:00 P.M. Eastern Time.

The following application tracking information was generated by the system:

Grants.gov Tracking 

Number :

CFDA Number:

CFDA Description:

Funding Opportunity 

Number :

Funding Opportunity 

Description :

Agency Name :

Application Name of 

this Submission :

Date/Time of Receipt :

TRACK MY APPLICATION – To check the status of this application, please click the link below:

It is suggested you Save and/or Print this response for your records.

Applicant DUNS:

Submitter's Name:
### §9279. Distinguished flying cross: award; limitations

(a) The President may award a distinguished flying cross of appropriate design with accompanying ribbon to any person who, while serving in any capacity with the Air Force, distinguishes himself by heroism or extraordinary achievement while participating in an aerial flight.

(b) Not more than one distinguished flying cross may be awarded to a person. However, for each succeeding act that would otherwise justify the award of such a cross, the President may award a suitable bar or other device to be worn as he directs.

(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 541, §8749; renumbered §9279, Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, §806(b)(11), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1833; Pub. L. 116–92, div. A, title V, §582(b)(4), Dec. 20, 2019, 133 Stat. 1412.)

| Revised section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 8749(a) 8749(b)8749(c) | 10:1429 (less 2d and last sentences).10:1429 (2d sentence).10:1429 (last sentence, less 1st 49 words). | July 2, 1926, ch. 721, §12 (less 1st 49 words of last sentence), 44 Stat. 789; July 30, 1937, ch. 545, §4, 50 Stat. 549. |

8749(b)

8749(c)

10:1429 (2d sentence).

10:1429 (last sentence, less 1st 49 words).

In subsection (a), the words "under such rules and regulations as he may prescribe" are omitted, since the President has inherent authority to issue regulations appropriate to exercising his functions. The words "but not in the name of Congress" are omitted as surplusage, since a medal is presented in the name of Congress only if the law so directs. The word "award" is substituted for the word "present" to cover the determination of the recipients as well as the actual presentation of the medal. The words "since the 6th day of April, 1917, has distinguished, or who, after July 2, 1926" and 10:1429 (proviso of 1st sentence) are omitted as executed.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2019—Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 116–92 struck out subsec. (c) which read as follows: "No distinguished flying cross, or device in place thereof, may be awarded or presented to a person whose service after he distinguished himself has not been honorable."

2018—Pub. L. 115–232 renumbered section 8749 of this title as this section.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2018 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 115–232 effective Feb. 1, 2019, with provision for the coordination of amendments and special rule for certain redesignations, see section 800 of Pub. L. 115–232, set out as a note preceding section 3001 of this title.
### §8243. Fixing cost on certain vessels and stations

If the Secretary of the Navy considers that it is undesirable to administer the mess on any ship or at any station under the quantity allowance prescribed in section 8242 of this title, he may fix the cost of each ration for that mess.

(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 380, §6083; renumbered §8243 and amended Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, §§807(b)(8), 809(a), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1835, 1840.)

| Revised section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 6083 | 34 U.S.C. 902d. | Mar. 2, 1933, ch. 184, §4, 47 Stat. 1423; Aug. 3, 1951, ch. 287, 65 Stat. 151. |

The words "the cost of each ration for that mess" are substituted for the words "the monetary limit of the cost of ration aboard such ships and at such stations" to make it clear that the figure fixed by the Secretary of the Navy under this section is the amount the mess may spend per day for food for each man subsisting at the mess.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–232 renumbered section 6083 of this title as this section and substituted "section 8242" for "section 6082".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2018 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 115–232 effective Feb. 1, 2019, with provision for the coordination of amendments and special rule for certain redesignations, see section 800 of Pub. L. 115–232, set out as a note preceding section 3001 of this title.
### §2209. Management funds

(a) To conduct economically and efficiently the operations of the Department of Defense that are financed by at least two appropriations but whose costs cannot be immediately distributed and charged to those appropriations, there is the Army Management Fund, the Navy Management Fund, and the Air Force Management Fund, each within its respective department and under the direction of the Secretary of that department. Each such fund shall consist of a corpus of $1,000,000 and such amounts as may be appropriated thereto from time to time. An account for an operation that is to be financed by such a fund may be established only with the approval of the Secretary of Defense.

(b) Under such regulations as the Secretary of Defense may prescribe, expenditures may be made from a management fund for material (other than for stock), personal services, and services under contract. However, obligation may not be incurred against that fund if it is not chargeable to funds available under an appropriation of the department concerned or funds of another department or agency of the Department of Defense. The fund shall be promptly reimbursed from those funds for expenditures made from it.

(c) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, advances, by check or warrant, or reimbursements, may be made from available appropriations to a management fund on the basis of the estimated cost of a project. As adequate data becomes available, the estimated cost shall be revised and necessary adjustments made. Final adjustment shall be made with the appropriate funds for the fiscal year in which the advances or reimbursements are made. Except as otherwise provided by law, amounts advanced to management funds are available for obligation only during the fiscal year in which they are advanced.

(Added Pub. L. 87–651, title II, §207(a), Sept. 7, 1962, 76 Stat. 522.)

| Revised section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2209(a)2209(b)2209(c) | 5:172e(a), (b).5:172e(c) (last sentence).5:172e(c) (less last sentence).5:172e(d). | July 3, 1942, ch. 484; restated Aug. 10, 1949, ch. 412, §11 (16th through 19th pars.), 63 Stat. 588. |

2209(b)

2209(c)

5:172e(c) (last sentence).

5:172e(c) (less last sentence).

5:172e(d).

In subsection (a), the second sentence is substituted for the second sentence of 5 U.S.C. 172e(a) and the first sentence (less last 21 words) of 5 U.S.C. 172e(b) which are omitted as unnecessary.

In subsection (c), the 13th through 33d words of 5 U.S.C. 172e(d) are omitted as surplusage.
H. Res. 408

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

February 1, 2000.

Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it

shall be in order without intervention of any point of order

to consider in the House the bill (H.R. 1838) to assist in the

enhancement of the security of Taiwan, and for other purposes. The bill shall be considered as read for amendment.

The amendment recommended by the Committee on International Relations now printed in the bill shall be considered

as adopted. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill, as amended, and on any further amendment

thereto to final passage without intervening motion except:

(1) one hour of debate on the bill, as amended, equally divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority

member of the Committee on International Relations; (2) an

amendment printed in the Congressional Record pursuant to

clause 8 of rule XVIII, if offered by the Minority Leader or

a designee, which shall be considered as read and shall be

separately debatable for one hour equally divided and con-
2

•HRES 408 EH

trolled by the proponent and an opponent; and (3) one motion to recommit with or without instructions.

Attest:

Clerk.
#### § 39.103 What are the factors used to determine base funding?

To determine base funding, schools must use the factors shown in the following table. The school must apply the appropriate factor to each student for funding purposes.

| Grade level | Base
academic
funding factor | Base
residential
funding factor |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Kindergarten | 1.15 | NA |
| Grades 1-3 | 1.38 | 1.75 |
| Grades 4-6 | 1.15 | 1.6 |
| Grades 7-8 | 1.38 | 1.6 |
| Grades 9-12 | 1.5 | 1.6 |
Final report 

Korea Testing and Research Institute 

1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
25 

27 
28 
29 
30 
31 
32 
33 
34 
35 
36 
37 
38 
39 
40 
41 
42 
43 
Figures and Tables 
Final page 49 
page 1 of 49 
page 2 of 49 
page 3 of 49 
page 4 of 49 













































Appendices 



































































































Annexes 
Page 1 of 15 
Page 2 of 15 
Page 3 of 15 
Page 4 of 15 
Page 5 of 15 
Page 6 of 15 
Page 1 of 15 
Page 8 of 15 
~ Ill ~ 

Page 9 of 15 
-IVPage 10 of 15 
Page 11 of 15 
Page 12 of 15 
Page 13 of 15 
Page 14 of 15 
-IXPage 15 of 15
#### § 225.6 Authority and responsibility of the Minerals Management Service (MMS).

The functions of the MMS for reporting, accounting, and auditing are found in 30 CFR chapter II, subchapters A and C. These regulations, unless specifically stated otherwise in this part or in other regulations, apply to all minerals agreements approved under this part. To the extent the parties to a minerals agreement are able to provide reasonable provisions satisfactorily addressing the issues or functions governed by the MMS regulations relating to valuation of mineral product, method of payment, accounting procedures, and auditing procedures, the Secretary may approve alternate provisions in a minerals agreement.
# C_2014164EN.01000501.xml

| 29.5.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 164/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.5.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 164/5

---

Commission communication pursuant to Article 17(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community

Invitation to tender in respect of the operation of scheduled air services in accordance with public service obligations

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2014/C 164/05)

| Member State | Greece |
| --- | --- |
| Concerned route | Athens – Kozani – Kastoria |
| Period of validity of the contract | 1 September 2014-31 August 2018 |
| Deadline for submission of tenders | 61 days after the day of publication of the notice of PSOs |
| Address where the text of the invitation to tender and any relevant information related to the public tender and the public service obligation can be obtained free of charge | Hellenic Civil Aviation Authority |
| Directorate General for Air Transport |
| Air Transport and International Affairs Division |
| Section II |
| PO Box 70360 |
| 16604 Glyfada — Athens |
| GREECE |
| Tel. +30 2108916149 / 2108916121 |
| Fax +30 2108947132 |
| Internet: www.hcaa.gr |

Member State

Greece

Concerned route

Athens – Kozani – Kastoria

Period of validity of the contract

1 September 2014-31 August 2018

Deadline for submission of tenders

61 days after the day of publication of the notice of PSOs

Address where the text of the invitation to tender and any relevant information related to the public tender and the public service obligation can be obtained free of charge

Hellenic Civil Aviation Authority

Directorate General for Air Transport

Air Transport and International Affairs Division

Section II

PO Box 70360

16604 Glyfada — Athens

GREECE

Tel. +30 2108916149 / 2108916121

Fax +30 2108947132

Internet: www.hcaa.gr

---
IV

House Calendar No. 95

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 262

[Report No. 106–268]

Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the

bill (H.R. 2465) making appropriations for military construction, family

housing, and base realignment and closure for the Department of Defense

for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2000, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 27, 1999

Mrs. MYRICK, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution;

which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

RESOLUTION

Waiving points of order against the conference report to

accompany the bill (H.R. 2465) making appropriations

for military construction, family housing, and base realignment and closure for the Department of Defense

for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2000, and for

other purposes.

1 Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it

2 shall be in order to consider the conference report to ac3 company the bill (H.R. 2465) making appropriations for

4 military construction, family housing, and base realign-
2

HRES 262 RH

1 ment and closure for the Department of Defense for the

2 fiscal year ending September 30, 2000, and for other pur3 poses. All points of order against the conference report

4 and against its consideration are waived. The conference

5 report shall be considered as read.

House Calendar No. 95

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 262

[Report No. 106–268]

RESOLUTION

Waiving points of order against the conference reposes. ending September 30, 2000, and for other pur- the Department of Defense for the fiscal year housing, and base realignment and closure for appropriations for military construction, family port to accompany the bill (H.R. 2465) making

JULY 27, 1999

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be

printed
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 36 (Wednesday, February 23, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 10073]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-4078]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the 
Government in the Sunshine Act, Public Law 94-409, that the Securities 
and Exchange Commission will hold a Closed Meeting on Thursday, 
February 24, 2011 at 2 p.m.
    Commissioners, Counsel to the Commissioners, the Secretary to the 
Commission, and recording secretaries will attend the Closed Meeting. 
Certain staff members who have an interest in the matters also may be 
present.
    The General Counsel of the Commission, or his designee, has 
certified that, in his opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth 
in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(3), (5), (7), 9(B) and (10) and 17 CFR 
200.402(a)(3), (5), (7), 9(ii) and (10), permit consideration of the 
scheduled matters at the Closed Meeting.
    Commissioner Aguilar, as duty officer, voted to consider the items 
listed for the Closed Meeting in a closed session.
    The subject matter of the Closed Meeting scheduled for Thursday, 
February 24, 2011 will be:

    Institution and settlement of injunctive actions;
    Institution and settlement of administrative proceedings; and
    Other matters relating to enforcement proceedings.

    At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in 
the scheduling of meeting items.
    For further information and to ascertain what, if any, matters have 
been added, deleted or postponed, please contact:
    The Office of the Secretary at (202) 551-5400.

    Dated: February 17, 2011.
Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011-4078 Filed 2-18-11; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 11
                        BINDVIEW DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
     STATEMENTS REGARDING COMPUTATION OF LOSS PER COMMON SHARE (UNAUDITED)
                    (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                        THREE MONTHS ENDED
                                                             MARCH 31,
                                                  ----------------------------
                                                        2001            2000
                                                  ---------------  ------------
<S>                                              <C>               <C>
Net loss                                              $ (4,275)       $ (6,675)
                                                      =========       =========

Shares used in basic calculation
        Total basic shares                              51,557          50,519

Additional shares for diluted computation:
  Effect of stock options                                2,117           6,281
  Effect of warrants                                        --              75
  Effect of convertible preferred stock and
    debentures                                              --           1,409
  Exclusion of share equivalents that are
    anti-dilutive because a loss was incurred           (2,117)         (7,765)
                                                      ---------       ---------
        Total diluted shares                            51,557          50,519
                                                      ========        ========
Loss per common share (basic and diluted)             $  (0.08)       $  (0.13)
                                                      ========        ========
</TABLE>
### IN THE UNI TED STATES COURT OFAPPEALS FOR THE FIF TH CIRCUIT

No. 10-30593 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee

v. JAMES JOSEPH, also known as Lil James, also known a s Trump, Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana USDC No. 6:09-CR-64-7

Before KING, BENAVIDES, and ELROD, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * On the fourth day of a jury trial, James Joseph plea d e d gu ilty to conspiracy to possess and distribute cocaine and cocaine base. He was sentenced to 220 months in prison. He appeals; we affirm. Joseph first contends that the district co urt committed a clear error by increasing his offense level due to his aggravating role as a leader, manager, supervisor, or organizer of the conspiracy. The unrebutted presentence report,

as well as evidence adduced at trial, indicated that Joseph directed the U n i te d S ta te s C o u rt o f A p p ea l s

F i ft h C i rc u i t 

### F I L E D July 13, 2 011 Lyle W . Cayce Clerk

Purs uant to 5 T H C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court hasd ete rm inedthat this op inion sho uld not * be publ ish ed and is not pr ece dent excep t unde r the lim ite d cir cum st ance s se t forth in 5 T H C IR

. R. 47.5 .4. Case: 10-30593 Document: 00511538516 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/13/2011No. 10-30593

transportation activities of at least one other person and that he otherwise “exercised management responsibility over the property, assets, or activities of

a criminal organization.” U.S.S.G. § 3B1.1, comment. (n.2) (Nov. 2009). Because the district court’s finding was plausible in light of the record, the aggravatingrole adjustment was not clearly erroneous. See United States v. Posada-Rios , 158 F.3d 832, 878 (5th Cir. 1998); United States v. Parker , 133 F.3d 322, 330 (5th Cir. 1998). In his second claim, Joseph argues that the district court violated his Fifth and Sixth Amendment rights by basing his sentence on facts that were neither admitted nor proved to a jury beyond a reasonable doubt. Because Joseph was sentenced under the advisory guidelines scheme mandated by United States v. Booker , 543 U.S. 220 (2005), the distri c t c o urt was “entitled to find by a preponderance of the evidence all the facts relevant to th e d e t e r m ination of a Guideline sentencing range.” United States v. Whitfield , 590 F.3d 325, 367 (5th Cir. 2009). Consequently, Joseph’s argument is foreclosed. The district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

2 Case: 10-30593 Document: 00511538516 Page: 2 Date Filed: 07/13/2011