alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2006157EN.01002301.xml

| 6.7.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 157/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.7.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 157/23

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4199 — De Lage Landen/Athlon)

(2006/C 157/09)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 12 June 2006, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition web site (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes. |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition web site (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes.

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4199. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://ec.europa.eu/eur-lex/lex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4199. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://ec.europa.eu/eur-lex/lex)

---
#### § 18.305 How will a tribe be notified of the disapproval of a single heir rule?

If we disapprove a single heir rule, we must provide the tribe with a written notification of the disapproval that includes an explanation of the reasons for the disapproval.
# C_2006224EN.01003204.xml

| 16.9.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 224/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.9.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 224/32

---

Order of the President of the First Chamber of the Court of 19 May 2006 — Commission of the European Communities v Kingdom of the Netherlands

(Case C-253/05) (1)

1

(2006/C 224/64)

Language of the case: Dutch

Language of the case: Dutch

The President of the First Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 229, 17.09.2005.

1

---
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-22-00602-CR

JOSE ANGEL DIAZ

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

On Appeal from the

206th District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CR-3546-22-D

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes that two of the judgments of the trial court should be affirmed and 

that one judgment should be vacated. The Court AFFIRMS the judgments of conviction 

for continuous sexual abuse and indecency with a child by contact and VACATES the 

judgment of conviction for aggravated sexual assault.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

August 15, 2024
EXHIBIT 32 -- Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
              Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





                    CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Australian-Canadian
Oil Royalties Ltd. (the "Company") for the quarterly period ended September 30,
2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), Andre Sakhai, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, and Robert Kamon, Secretary and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of their
knowledge, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



November 15, 2005                          /S/ ANDRE SAKHAI
                                         --------------------------
                                         Andre Sakhai, President and
                                         Chief Executive Officer



November 15, 2005                          /S/ ROBERT KAMON
                                         --------------------------
                                         Robert Kamon
                                         Chief Financial Officer and Secretary




This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.



                                       16
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:**Florida�sforests
 
1982| 1987| 1995| 2005| 2007|2013|
 
SuDoc Number:A 13.80:F 76/F 66/

Item Number:[if !vml]>[endif]>0083-B-05(online)

CGP systemNumber: 001036085
### Quantitative interpretation of mineralogical composition from X-ray and chemical data for the Pierre Shale

By: L.G. Schultz

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/pp391C

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plate:  **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
# C_2014003EN.01000401.xml

| 8.1.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 3/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.1.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 3/4

---

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the TFEU

Cases where the Commission raises no objections

(Text with EEA relevance)

2014/C 3/04

| Date of adoption of the decision | 14.11.2013 |
| --- | --- |
| Reference number of State Aid | SA.37124 (13/N) |
| Member State | Netherlands |
| Region | — | — |
| Title (and/or name of the beneficiary) | Wijzigingen aan de Suppletieregeling Filminvesteringen |
| Legal basis | Wet op het specifiek cultuurbeleid |
| Type of measure | Scheme | — |
| Objective | Culture |
| Form of aid | Reimbursable grant |
| Budget | | Overall budget: EUR 31 250 000 |

Date of adoption of the decision

14.11.2013

Reference number of State Aid

SA.37124 (13/N)

Member State

Netherlands

Region

—

—

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

Wijzigingen aan de Suppletieregeling Filminvesteringen

Legal basis

Wet op het specifiek cultuurbeleid

Type of measure

Scheme

—

Objective

Culture

Form of aid

Reimbursable grant

Budget

Overall budget: EUR 31 250 000

| | Annual budget: EUR 6 250 000 |
| --- | --- |

Annual budget: EUR 6 250 000

Intensity

25 %

Duration (period)

1.1.2014-31.12.2018

Economic sectors

Motion picture, video and television programme activities

Name and address of the granting authority

| Nederlands Filmfonds |
| --- |
| Pijnackerstraat 5 |
| 1072 JS Amsterdam |
| NEDERLAND |

Nederlands Filmfonds

Pijnackerstraat 5

1072 JS Amsterdam

NEDERLAND

Other information

—

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

http://ec.europa.eu/competition/elojade/isef/index.cfm

---
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Bertha Williams, Appellant.

Motion denied on condition that defendant perfect her appeal and *907put her case at the foot of the present calendar to be ready for argument when reached, or if moved by the district attorney after two weeks from the date of this order. Present — Woodward, Jenks, Hooker, Gaynor and Rich, JJ.
§ 293.23 What factors will be used to determine whether provisions in a compact or amendment are directly related to the operation of gaming activities? ( a ) The parties must show that these provisions described in § 293.22 are directly connected to the Tribe's conduct of class III gaming activities. Examples include, but are not limited to: ( 1 ) Minimum age for patrons to participate in gaming;
( 2 ) Transportation of gaming devices and equipment; or
( 3 ) Exclusion of patrons.
( b ) Mutually beneficial proximity, or even co-management alone is insufficient to establish a “direct connection” between the Tribe's class III gaming and adjacent business or amenities. Additionally, Tribal infrastructure projects or economic development activities that are funded by gaming revenue and may service or otherwise provide a benefit to the gaming activity are not directly related to the conduct of gaming without other evidence of a direct connection.
( c ) Provisions which are not directly related to the operation of gaming activities include, but are not limited to: ( 1 ) Expressly limiting third party Tribes' rights to conduct gaming activities under IGRA;
( 2 ) Relating to treaty rights;
( 3 ) Relating to tobacco sales;
( 4 ) Requiring compliance with or adoption of State environmental regulation of projects or activities that are not directly related to the Tribe's operation of gaming activities and maintenance of the gaming facility;
( 5 ) Requiring memorandum of understanding, intergovernmental agreements, or similar agreements with local governments;
( 6 ) Requiring enforcement of State court orders garnishing employee wages or patron winnings;
( 7 ) Granting State court jurisdiction over tort claims arising from the Tribe's conduct of class III gaming activities;
( 8 ) Regulating non-gaming conduct not within gaming spaces or non-gaming Tribal economic activities, including activities in or adjacent to the gaming facility, including, but not limited to, restaurants, nightclubs, hotels, event centers, water parks, gas stations, and convenience stores; or
( 9 ) Relating to the conduct of Tribal class I or class II gaming activities.
( d ) The inclusion of provisions for which the parties cannot show a direct connection to the Tribe's conduct of class III gaming activities may be considered evidence of a violation of IGRA.
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Justice Drug Enforcement Administration
 Pursuant to § 1301.33(a), Title 21 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), this is notice that on January 6, 2011, Johnson Matthey Pharmaceutical Materials Inc., Pharmaceutical Service, 25 Patton Road, Devens, Massachusetts 01434, made application by renewal to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) to be registered as a bulk manufacturer of the following basic classes of controlled substances: Drug
ScheduleAmphetamine (1100)
IIMethylphenidate (1724)
IINabilone (7379)
IIAlfentanil (9737)
IISufentanil (9740)
IIHydrocodone (9193)
II
 The company plans to utilize this facility to manufacture small quantities of the listed controlled substances in bulk and to conduct analytical testing in support of the company's primary manufacturing facility in West Deptford, New Jersey. The controlled substances manufactured in bulk at this facility will be distributed to the company's customers. Any other such applicant, and any person who is presently registered with DEA to manufacture such substances, may file comments or objections to the issuance of the proposed registration pursuant to 21 CFR 1301.33(a). Any such written comments or objections should be addressed, in quintuplicate, to the Drug Enforcement Administration, Office of Diversion Control, Federal Register Representative (ODL), 8701 Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia 22152; and must be filed no later than April 25, 2011. Dated: February 15, 2011. Joseph T. Rannazzisi, Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement Administration.


[FR Doc. 2011-3928 Filed 2-22-11; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4410-09-P
Exhibit 32.1

                                  CERTIFICATION
                           Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350
                 (Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of FreeFlow, Inc. (the
"Company") for the year ended December 31, 2012, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), S Douglas Henderson,
as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Date: February 8, 2013                   By: /s/ S Douglas Henderson
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            S Douglas Henderson
                                            Chief Executive Officer

This certification accompanies each Report pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of ss.18
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# C_2017443EN.01091101.xml

| 22.12.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 443/911 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.12.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 443/911

---

P7_TA(2014)0406

AIEM tax applicable in the Canary Islands*

European Parliament legislative resolution of 16 April 2014 on the proposal for a Council decision on the AIEM tax applicable in the Canary Islands (COM(2014)0171 — C7-0106/2014 — 2014/0093(CNS))

(Special legislative procedure — consultation)

(2017/C 443/82)

The European Parliament,

The European Parliament

| — | having regard to the Commission proposal to the Council (COM(2014)0171), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the Commission proposal to the Council (COM(2014)0171),

| — | having regard to Article 349 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C7-0106/2014), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Article 349 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C7-0106/2014),

| — | having regard to Rules 55 and 46(1) of its Rules of Procedure, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Rules 55 and 46(1) of its Rules of Procedure,

| — | having regard to the report of the Committee on Regional Development (A7-0263/2014), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the report of the Committee on Regional Development (A7-0263/2014),

| 1. | Approves the Commission proposal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Approves the Commission proposal;

| 2. | Calls on the Council to notify Parliament if it intends to depart from the text approved by Parliament; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Calls on the Council to notify Parliament if it intends to depart from the text approved by Parliament;

| 3. | Asks the Council to consult Parliament again if it intends to substantially amend the text approved by Parliament; |
| --- | --- |

3.

Asks the Council to consult Parliament again if it intends to substantially amend the text approved by Parliament;

| 4. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the national parliaments. |
| --- | --- |

4.

Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the national parliaments.

---
----

|                          |
|--------------------------|
|                          |  |
| 001-10315                | 63-0860407 |
| (Commission File Number) | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
|                     |   |

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |
| ¨ | Written communication pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425) |
| ¨ | Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12) |
| ¨ | Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b)) |
| ¨ | Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c)) |

----

----

|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 1) | provide that the leverage ratio financial covenant shall be calculated on a pro forma basis, allowing any such pro forma to include the effects of investments, acquisitions, mergers, and operational changes, such as historical income statement items and, to the extent projected in good faith and in a factually supportable manner, future synergies and cost savings; and |

|    |                                                                                                                |
|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 2) | increase the amount of specifically permitted capitalized lease obligations from $200 million to $350 million. |

----

|      |
|------|
|      |  |
| 10.1 | Third Amendment and Additional Tranche Term Loan Amendment toThird Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of June 24, 2015, amongHealthSouth Corporation, Barclays Bank PLC, as administrative agent and collateral agent, Citigroup Global Markets Inc., as syndication agent, Bank of America, N.A., Goldman Sachs Lending Partners LLC, and Morgan Stanley Senior Funding, Inc., as co-documentation agents, and various other lenders from time to time. |

----

|                         |
|-------------------------|
|                         |  |  |
| HEALTHSOUTH CORPORATION |
| By:                     | /S/   JOHN P. WHITTINGTON |
|                    | Name: | John P. Whittington |
|                    | Title: | Executive Vice President, General Counseland Corporate Secretary |
§ 426.105 Identification required when requesting access to records pertaining to an individual. The Commission will require reasonable identification of all individuals who request access to records in a Commission system to ensure that records are disclosed to the proper person. ( a ) The amount of personal identification required will of necessity vary with the sensitivity of the record involved. In general, if you request disclosure in person, you will be required to show an identification card, such as a driver's license, containing your photograph and sample signature. However, with regard to records in Commission systems that contain particularly sensitive and/or detailed personal information, the Commission reserves the right to require additional means of identification as are appropriate under the circumstances. These means include, but are not limited to, requiring you to sign a statement under oath as to your identity, acknowledging that you are aware of the criminal penalties for requesting or obtaining records under false pretenses or falsifying information (see 5 U.S.C. 552a(i)(3); 18 U.S.C. 1001).
( b ) If you request disclosure by mail, the Commission will request such information as may be necessary to ensure that you are properly identified and for a response to be sent. Authorized means to achieve this goal include, but are not limited to, requiring that a mail request include a signed, notarized statement asserting your identity or a statement signed under oath as described in subsection (a) of this section.