alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EC

/RIncorporated Providing Environmental Technical Support Since 1989

501 Eastowne Drive, Suite 250 Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27514

Telephone: (919)484-0222  Fax: (919) 484-0122

 MEMORANDUM

DATE: August 1, 2013

SUBJECT: Summary of June 20, 2013, Meeting with Representatives from the American 

Petroleum Institute (API)

FROM: Heather P. Brown, EC/R Incorporated

TO: Bruce Moore, EPA/OAQPS/SPPD/FIG

I. PURPOSE

This memorandum summarizes the June 20, 2013 meeting between the Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA) and industry representatives from the American Petroleum Institute (API). The 

intent of the meeting was to allow API to clarify their comments submitted to EPA, dated May 

28, 2013,1 regarding EPA’s April 12, 2013, proposed amendments. 

II. DATE

The meeting took place on June 20, 2013, at 9:00 am at the EPA building in the Research 

Triangle Park, NC. Several industry members participated via telephone.

III. ATTENDEES

The following individuals participated in the meeting:

Industry Representatives

Jeff Adams, BP

Shankar Ananthakrishna, Chevron

Grover Campbell, Chesapeake Energy 

Chris Colman, Hess

Robert Ferry, TGB Partnership

Tom Monahan, Exxon Mobil

Jesse Sandlin, Devon

Manish Singh, Oxy

Matt Todd, API

Dana Wood, BP

Jason Zapalac, Anadarko Petroleum Corporation

 1

Comment submitted by Matthew Todd, Senior Policy Advisor, American Petroleum Institute (API) to EPA Docket 

Center, Washington, DC. Comments of the Gas Processors Association Regarding the Oil and Natural Gas Sector: 

Reconsideration of Certain Provisions of New Source Performance Standards; Proposed Rule, 78 Fed. Reg. 22,126 

(April 12, 2013), May 28, 2013. EPA Docket No.EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-0505-4630.
2

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)

Bruce Moore, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards (OAQPS)

Chris Frantz, OAQPS

Charlene Spells, OAQPS

David Cozzie, OAQPS

EC/R Incorporated

David Hendricks

IV. SUMMARY OF DISCUSSION

API discussed their May 2013 comments and addressed the topics listed below.

• Section 60.5365. Storage vessel applicability.

• Section 60.5395. Storage vessel standards.

• Section 60.5410. Duplicative and unnecessary for storage vessels.

• Section 60.5411. Cover and closed vent system standards. 

• Section 60.5412. Control devices standards.

• Section 60.5413. Control device performance testing.

• Section 60.5415. Duplicative and unnecessary for storage vessels.

• Section 60.5416. Cover and closed vent system inspection requirements.

• Section 60.5417. Control device inspection and monitoring requirements.

• Section 60.5420. Notification, reporting, and recordkeeping requirements.

• Section 60.5430. Definitions.

• Responses to EPA’s requests for comment on proposed NSPS OOOO Amendments.
cc: Hon. Valorie J. Vega, District Judge 

Philip J. Taft 

Attorney General/Carson City 

Clark County District Attorney 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

(0) 1947A 

2
# C_2014116EN.01000301.xml

| 16.4.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 116/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.4.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 116/3

---

Explanatory Notes to the Combined Nomenclature of the European Union

2014/C 116/03

Pursuant to the second indent of Article 9(1)(a) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 (1), the Explanatory Notes to the Combined Nomenclature of the European Union (2) are hereby amended as follows:

1

2

On page 59, the following text is inserted before the Explanatory note to heading ‘1101 00 Wheat or meslin flour’:

‘1101 00 Wheat or meslin flour’

| ‘Additional note 2 | As regards coconut, Additional note 2 to this chapter applies only to flour, meal and powder of coconut. Shredded desiccated coconut is classified under subheading 0801 11 00 and does not fall under the scope of heading 1106 even when it fulfils the criteria set out in point (b) of Additional note 2 to this chapter.
  Shredded desiccated coconut is presented in slices, small fragments or thin strips. Coconut flour, meal or powder consists of fine particles.’ |
| --- | --- |

‘Additional note 2

As regards coconut, Additional note 2 to this chapter applies only to flour, meal and powder of coconut. Shredded desiccated coconut is classified under subheading 0801 11 00 and does not fall under the scope of heading 1106 even when it fulfils the criteria set out in point (b) of Additional note 2 to this chapter.

Shredded desiccated coconut is presented in slices, small fragments or thin strips. Coconut flour, meal or powder consists of fine particles.’

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 of 23 July 1987 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff (OJ L 256, 7.9.1987, p. 1).

1

(2)  OJ C 137, 6.5.2011, p. 1.

2

---
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of BindView Development Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Edward
L. Pierce, Director, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Corporation.

By      /s/ EDWARD L. PIERCE
        -------------------------------

        Edward L. Pierce
        Director, Senior Vice President
        and Chief Financial Officer
# C_2006212EN.01002602.xml

| 2.9.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 212/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.9.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 212/26

---

Action brought on 20 July 2006 — Commission of the European Communities v Kingdom of Belgium

(Case C-320/06)

(2006/C 212/45)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: J. Enegren and G. Rozet, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Kingdom of Belgium

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | Declare that, by not adopting, and in any event by not notifying to the Commission, the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2002/14/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 March 2002 establishing a general framework for informing and consulting employees in the European Community (1), the Kingdom of Belgium has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 11 of that directive; |
| --- | --- |

—

Declare that, by not adopting, and in any event by not notifying to the Commission, the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2002/14/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 March 2002 establishing a general framework for informing and consulting employees in the European Community (1), the Kingdom of Belgium has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 11 of that directive;

1

| — | Order the Kingdom of Belgium to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Kingdom of Belgium to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The period for transposition of Directive 2002/14/EC into domestic law expired on 23 March 2005.

---

(1)  OJ L 80, p. 29.

1

---
§ 15.103 How do I begin the probate process? As soon as possible, contact any of the following offices to inform us of the decedent's death: ( a ) The agency or BIA regional office nearest to where the decedent was enrolled;
( b ) Any agency or BIA regional office; or
( c ) The Trust Beneficiary Call Center in OST.
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

 

 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM ENGINEERS AND GEOLOGISTS

 

As independent petroleum engineers, we hereby consent to the inclusion or incorporation by reference in the Amendment No. 1 to the Registration Statement on Form S-3 (No. 333-189394) and the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Pacific Coast Oil Trust of the information from our firm’s reserves report dated March 2, 2018 and all references to our firm included in or made part of the Pacific Coast Trust Annual Report on Form 10-K.

 

 
|   | **NETHERLAND,   SEWELL & ASSOCIATES, INC.** |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                            |
|   | By:                                             | /s/ J. Carter   Henson, Jr. |
|   |                                            | J. Carter   Henson, Jr., P.E. |
|   |                                            | Senior Vice   President |

 

Houston, Texas 

March 9, 2018

 

Please be advised that the digital document you are viewing is provided by Netherland, Sewell & Associates, Inc. (NSAI) as a convenience to our clients. The digital document is intended to be substantively the same as the original signed document maintained by NSAI. The digital document is subject to the parameters, limitations, and conditions stated in the original document. In the event of any differences between the digital document and the original document, the original document shall control and supersede the digital document.

 

----
### §7035. Deputy Chiefs of Staff and Assistant Chiefs of Staff

(a) The Deputy Chiefs of Staff and the Assistant Chiefs of Staff shall be general officers detailed to those positions.

(b) The Secretary of the Army shall prescribe the number of Deputy Chiefs of Staff and Assistant Chiefs of Staff, for a total of not more than eight positions.

(Added Pub. L. 99–433, title V, §502(e), Oct. 1, 1986, 100 Stat. 1042, §3035; amended Pub. L. 110–181, div. A, title IX, §902(a), Jan. 28, 2008, 122 Stat. 272; renumbered §7035, Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, §808(a), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1838.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–232 renumbered section 3035 of this title as this section.

2008—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 110–181, amended subsec. (b) generally. Prior to amendment, subsec. (b) read as follows: "The number of Deputy Chiefs of Staff and Assistant Chiefs of Staff shall be prescribed by the Secretary, except that—

"(1) there may not be more than five Deputy Chiefs of Staff; and

"(2) there may not be more than three Assistant Chiefs of Staff."

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2018 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 115–232 effective Feb. 1, 2019, with provision for the coordination of amendments and special rule for certain redesignations, see section 800 of Pub. L. 115–232, set out as a note preceding section 3001 of this title.
### Request for Information Ja son Gadrim (FAA-2015-0763) 9-AWA-AVS-333Exemptions (FAA)

Dear Mr. Gadrim:

This letter is to inform you that the following information is miss ing from your petition (Docket No. FAA

− 2015

− 0763). This information is necessary for the Fe deral Aviation Administrati on (FAA) to process your p etition.

 Describe the aircraft make(s), model(s), and type(s)(i.e., fixed

- wing, rotorcraft, lighter

- than

- air) for the proposed UAS operation. The description(s) should incl ude the maximum weight (i ncluding payload). This information can be located in the aircraft manual(s).

Please submit the additional informat ion (non-proprietary) to your docket at www.regulations.gov . Once your information has been submitted, pl ease also send a copy of the requested information (and any proprietary information), as well as your comment tracking number from regulations .gov via e-mail to 333exemptions@faa.gov. I f you want us to process your request any further, we must receive the information de scribed above by November 30, 2015. If we do not receive the in formation, we will close the doc ket without notifying you further.

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267-2999 .

FAA Office of Rulemaking Sent: Monday, November 16, 2015 10:46 AM To: Jason@longrangerc.com
|    |                                                                                                                       |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |

|    |                                                                                                                                                                  |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of HealthSouth Corporation. |

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |  |  |  |
| Date:  | October 28, 2016 |   |   |   |
|   |   | By: | /s/ DOUGLAS E. COLTHARP |   |
|   |   |   | Douglas E. Coltharp |   |
|   |   |   | Executive Vice President and |   |
|   |   |   | Chief Financial Officer |   |
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 341 Agreed to House (ATH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 341

Expressing the condolences of the House of Representatives on the death 
                       of Senator John H. Chafee.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 25, 1999

  Mr. Kennedy of Rhode Island submitted the following resolution; was 
                        considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Expressing the condolences of the House of Representatives on the death 
                       of Senator John H. Chafee.

    Resolved, That the House has heard with profound sorrow of the 
death of the Honorable John H. Chafee, a Senator from the State of 
Rhode Island.
    Resolved, That the Clerk communicate these resolutions to the 
Senate and transmit a copy thereof to the family of the deceased.
    Resolved, That a committee be appointed on the part of the House to 
join a committee appointed on the part of the Senate to attend the 
funeral.
    Resolved, That when the House adjourns today, it adjourn as a 
further mark of respect to the memory of the deceased Senator.
                                 <all>
```
# Raw Data

# Payments
§ 162.253 Will BIA's regulations concerning appeal bonds apply to cancellation decisions involving agricultural leases? ( a ) The appeal bond provisions in § 2.5 of part 2 of this chapter will not apply to appeals from lease cancellation decisions made under § 162.252 of this subpart. Instead, when we decide to cancel an agricultural lease, we may require that the tenant post an appeal bond with an appeal of the cancellation decision. The requirement to post an appeal bond will apply in addition to all of the other requirements in part 2 of this chapter.
( b ) An appeal bond should be set in an amount necessary to protect the Indian landowners against financial losses that will likely result from the delay caused by an appeal. Appeal bond requirements will not be separately appealable, but may be contested during the appeal of the lease cancellation decision.
§ 101.6 Modification of loans. ( a ) *United States direct loans.* Any modification of the terms and provisions of a United States direct loan agreement must be requested in writing by the borrower and approved by the Commissioner. The borrower will submit the request for modification and will indicate the section(s) of the loan agreement to be modified together with a justification for the modification. Requests for modifications of loan agreements will include an agreement to abide by the provisions of the regulations in this part and future amendments and modifications thereof. In addition, a current credit bureau report, obtained by the Bureau of Indian Affairs, will be made a part of the modification request.
( b ) *Relending program.* Any modification of the terms and provisions of a loan agreement of a borrower from an organization conducting a relending program must be in writing, agreed to by the borrower, and must be approved by the body authorized to act on loans and modifications thereof as provided in an approved declaration of policy and plan of operation or other plan. If a request for modification of a loan has been disapproved by the body authorized to act on the request, the rejected borrower may request the Commissioner to make a direct loan from the revolving loan fund if the Commissioner determines that the rejection is unwarranted.
[40 FR 3587, Jan. 23, 1975. Redesignated at 47 FR 13327, Mar. 30, 1982, as amended at 57 FR 46472, Oct. 8, 1992]
** **

**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATIONOF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

I,Stephen V. Clark, certify that:

1.             I have reviewed thisquarterly report on Form 10-Q of Bertucci’s Corporation;

2.             Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.             Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

4.             The Registrant’sother certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) [omitted] for the Registrant and have:

a.                  designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the Registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

b.                 [omitted]

c.                  evaluatedthe effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and

d.                 disclosedin this report any change in the Registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the Registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theRegistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theRegistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.            The Registrant’s othercertifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation ofinternal control over financial reporting, to the Registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the Registrant’s board of directors:

a.                  allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the Registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

b.                 any fraud, whetheror not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
| Date: May 18, 2007 |   | By:    |   | /s/ Stephen V. Clark                 |
|--------------------|--------|--------|--------|--------------------------------------|
|               |   |   |   | Stephen V. Clark                     |
|               |   |   |   | Chief Executive Officer and Director |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-29-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-1999
<CASH>                                             409
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   16,218
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (297)
<INVENTORY>                                     36,155
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                54,874
<PP&E>                                          15,556
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (4,845)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 172,016
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            9,504
<BONDS>                                        115,222
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                      38,653
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   172,016
<SALES>                                         61,385
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                61,385
<CGS>                                           30,516
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   30,516
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                23,741
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    60
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,504
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    564
<INCOME-TAX>                                       721
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (157)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    924
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       767
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
Response Directorate

Interagency Spill Response Planning Team 

Est. Jan 26, 2023

Joint Task Force-Red Hill

Naval Sea Systems Command 

Supervisor of Salvage and Diving 

Defense Logistics Agency

Port Operations

Hawaii Department of Health

Joint Base Pearl Harbor Hickam

Federal Fire Hawaii

United States Coast Guard

Our mission is to provide close supervision over facility fire safety, conduct 

immediate fire and spill response via qualified personnel, and coordinate 

emergency response for Joint Task Force-Red Hill. This is done in accordance 

with military and civilian authorities while insuring compliance with 

environmental regulatory bodies.

August 2023
#### Frederick Kindorf, Appellant, v. Philip J. Hoellerer, Respondent.

Order affirmed, with costs, on 87 Appellate Division, 628. (Patterson, P. J., and Laughlin, J., dissenting ) .