U.S. Government Printing Office Public Documents

October/ December 1981 Double Number 48/49 (GP 3.27:48/49) Assistant Public Printer (Superintendent of Documents)

Public Printer

Supports Depository

Library Program

[The following remarks were made by

Mr. Danford L. Sawyer, Jr., Public

Printer of the United States, to members of his Depository Library Council

and an audience of librarians and in- formation industry representatives

meeting in Alexandria, Virginia.]

"Good morning. I bring you greetings

from the President of the United States and the Reagan Administration, from

the Office of the Public Printer, and

from the Government Printing Office.

"I want you to know that it gives me

great pleasure to meet and welcome the

members of the Depository Library

Council, and to welcome the representatives of the information services, the

information industry, and the many

librarians who are in attendance today.

"As I think some of you know, I have

spent a great deal of my career in the

information industry. I have had the op- portunity to perform a wide variety of tasks, from cost accounting through

distribution of reading materials to

travellers in the State of Florida. "So, I look upon my new work as the

Public Printer of the United States as

a creative extension of that experience.

In the best sense, I feel that the past was prelude to a new and exciting chapter in the 120-year history of the United

States Government Printing Office.

"I want you to know from the outset

that I fully share your belief in the value

to the American people of the Depository Library Program. While growing up

in the State of New York, I was using

libraries, many of them depositories

with a wide variety of Government docu- ments. In later years in Florida, 1 have

very consciously used depository re- sources in my work and while pursuing

further education. "Mrs. Sawyer and I have been in- volved in libraries by serving on library

boards, or in soliciting grants for librar- ies in our community. I have done a bit of debating in my time, generally at a

little later hour in the day, and note that

today depositories are providing infor- mation to both high school and college debaters. Out of this group will come

some of our future Senators and Representatives, and possibly a President or two."Countless other Americans of all ages are using materials distributed through this Program. It is one of the

least recognized and most unique re- sources of our American public. No

other nation in the world has anything

comparable in scope or in freedom of public access. I intend to see that de- pository libraries become as well rec- ognized as our public schools and our

landgrant colleges, as a vital part of the

fabric of America.

"I have mentioned Florida where a

large part of my career was spent, 23

years to be exact. At present, there are 35 depository libraries in that State. What interests me greatly is that there

also exist in Florida seven Representative depository vacancies waiting to be

filled. There may also be some accredited law school libraries in my State which have not yet taken advantage of recent existing legislation which make

it possible for them to apply for depository status. Redistricting, as a result of the 1980 Census, will give us additional depository libraries. We have gained

four Congressional Districts in the

State, more than any other state east of the Mississippi.

"The principal reason I cite the in- stance of Florida, with which I am most

familiar, is that a similar pattern can

be found in most other states. I hope to do something about this: because

through the Depository Library Program we have the best means of economically

delivering valuable information to the

American people.

"I want you to help me see that we

begin to realize the full potential of this outstanding information delivery sys- tem in every one of our 50 states and

territories.

"It is my promise—and I am not a

politician, so I don't make promises

lightly—it is my promise to all of you

assembled here, and to the American

public, that during my tenure as Public

Printer, an all-out communications ef- fort will take place to fill every depository vacancy, and to raise the level of public awareness regarding the depository information resources available in our towns and cities. "We will publicize depositories

through all the media: television, radio, newspapers, magazines, and with imaginative posters and brochures.

"As a person whose career has been

committed to information and its dis- semination, I am here to help you, and

to be helped by you. The insights of this Council, and of the depository librar- ians throughout America, can pave the

way for an exciting decade of useful and economical information management from which the Free World can

greatly benefit.

"I know that you have a full agenda.

I want to thank you for your interest, your attendance, and your valuable advice. Thank you for the opportunity to be here with you."
Fall Depository

Library Council

Successful

Meeting in historic Old Town, Alexandria, Virginia, on September 28-30,

1981, were members of the Depository

Library Council to the Public Printer. Attending were librarians, information

specialists, and information industry

representatives from California to Maine, along with Danford L. Sawyer,

Jr. (Public Printer), Carl A. La Barre

(Assistant Public Printer, Superintendent of Documents), William G. Barrett (Deputy Assistant Public Printer, Su- perintendent of Documents), J. D. Young (Director, Library and Statutory

Distribution Service), Kay H. Baily

(Chief, Library Division), staff members

from the Government Printing Office, Joint Committee on Printing, Library of Congress, National Commission on Li- braries and Information Science, National Technical Information Service,

and OCLC, Inc. Leading off with remarks about the

GPO Sales Program was Mr. LaBarre,

who told the audience: "Our participation in the Lockheed Dialorder Online

Ordering System has been delayed

briefly pending resolution of a few legal

and contractual points by their legal

staff and our General Counsel. Subscribers to Dialog now have access to the Publications Reference File, and

when the contractual problems are re- solved. Dialog subscribers will be able

to order directly by computer from GPO.

"Additional information has been

added to the Publications Reference

File. That is the record for subscription

services. Two new essential coding ele- ments which speed subscription proc- essing have been added, as well as

retention information on back issues. "We are standardizing all instruc- tions on how to order Sales Program

publications in all of our advertising

media. Using the recently revised PRF

User's Manual as the model, all order- ing instructions published in such

products as the Monthly Catalog and

Price List 36 are being revised and up- dated to provide users with a clear,

easy-to-understand set of instructions on how to do business with GPO. Re- sponse to the revised PRF User's Manual has been enthusiastic and positive.

"Very shortly, an arrangement be- tween GPO and NTIS will be finalized so that customers maintaining a valid deposit account with NTIS may charge

GPO Sales Program purchases on their NTIS deposit account. Likewise, NTIS

customers may charge NTIS purchases

to their valid Superintendent of Docu- ments deposit account. "Approximately 130,000 copies of our "Just For You" Sales Catalog have

been distributed to the public to date. "A recent change in the law permits us to now sell publications of the U.S. Capitol Historical Society. Several of their excellent offerings have become

good sellers for us. Among them are: "We, the People," "The Story of the

U.S. Capitol, Its Past and Promise," the famous "We, the People: Congressional

Calendar," and water color prints of the U.S. Capitol, the Magna Carta, and

the Tradition of Liberty."

With the assistance of Mr. Barrett, Mr. LaBarre went on to give a detailed response to the resolutions passed during the Spring Council meeting. [See

special feature this issue for the complete text.] Council members then had their first opportunity to hear the new Public

Printer of the United States, Mr. Danford L. Sawyer, Jr. [See special feature

this issue for his remarks in full.] Ms. Faye M. Padgett, Deputy Staff Director, Joint Committee on Printing,

told about how the Committee views the Depository Library Program. "We are

very anxious to continue the support

that I feel we have given very enthusiastically to you in achieving your

goals over the past few years. "The message that I really wanted to give you this morning is one of a chal- lenge to you. We have spent a great deal

of time getting the publications that you

have expressed an interest in. We have

worked on policies to broaden the ac- cess to the citizens through the depositories by publicizing the availability of the libraries throughout the nation. "We know you have storage prob- lems. Everybody is getting a lot of publications. But the point that I wanted

to make is with the budget restrictions that are imminent, some of which are already starting to take effect. I think we will have to spend a great deal more

time in the future working on imaginative ways so that the level of service

that you receive is not lessened, but

somehow the Program can be run in a more economical way.

"So, I just wanted to tell all of you

that any ideas you might have the Joint

Committee is ready and willing to consider to help insure that in the future the Program continues as it has in the

past; and that you have the materials

that your constituencies need, and

that you have them in an economical

fashion, and, obviously, as quickly as

possible." Mr. J. D. Young, Director, Library

and Statutory Distribution Service, re- ported: "One result of the economics

of this Administration has been the

budget cuts in the Depository Program,

especially in our printing and binding

appropriations. This has necessitated a change in policy in our distribution for- mat. Instead of the exception, distri- bution in microfiche is now the rule.

I believe for cost reasons and for the

general good of the Program this change was necessary; and that in spite

of a great deal of pressure when we

were turned down on a supplemental

budget request, and had to convert to microfiche quickly to make it through

the Fiscal Year, I believe we did it carefully, using well thought out policies

and criteria. "We are working on ways to standardize micropublishing in the Federal Government. I have proposed that the Government Printing Office establish a General Purpose Micropublishing Contract for agency use which would in- corporate and encourage standard microfiche specifications and standards

for the header titling information for providing access to the fiche. "Let me discuss the Department of Energy situation. We are talking about

the distribution of about 17,000 DOE

studies and reports that we have not been distributing. These are contractor

originated documents. The only cost ef- fective way to handle this material is 2
through microfiche with distribution from the Technical Information Center

in Oak Ridge, Tennessee. "We have run into a major hang-up,

however, on this material. First off, DOE, at a meeting of the Joint Committee on Printing, has stated that they

will not pay for the distribution of the

fiche. They have no money and no pros- pect of picking up the tab until 1984.

At the same time, we are having problems within our own situation at GPO of being able to pay for that microfiche;

because, essentially, if we did, it won't be the way the law says it should be. "So, we still have some work to do

on that. I can't really say what the answer is going to be at this point in time, except that we are still working

on it. In the meantime, plan on continuing to get all of the Central Office, DOE

materials. This includes 200 or so

publications that are issued to the

general public, plus all EIA will still be

continuing." Ms. Toni C. Bearman, Executive Di- rector, National Commission on Libraries and Information Science, updated

the Council on NCLIS activities. Speaking of one of the Commission's special task forces, she said: "One of the principles that comes out of that public/

private sector task force report emphasizes the importance of the Government

disseminating its information to the

public through existing services such as

public libraries, and also emphasizes

the need to continue to strengthen the

depository library system."

Ms. Christine Grabenstatter, Users

Division, OCLC, Inc., reviewed progress

being made at OCLC. Of special interest was the following: "Probably the thing

that you want to hear the most about is the Distributive Automatic Record Proc- essing (DARP) Project. Initially we

thought that it would be a very easy

thing to implement for the Regional

depository libraries. This was based on two premises: that the Regionals re- ceive 100% of the depository materials, and that GPO is cataloging on-line on OCLC. Both of these premises may

soon no longer be true. As a result, OCLC has rethought this whole process; and we currently see the addition of holdings for depository materials being

handled in an off-line batch mode."

Ms. Kay H. Baily, Chief of the Library

Division, GPO, reviewed cataloging and

indexing developments. "We have been

a Conversion of Serials (CONSER)

Project member since November of 1980; and we plan to become more in- volved in the near future by becoming

an authentication center, as well as a branch of the National Serials Data Pro- gram. We held up a bit on implementing

this in order that the reorganization

would have a chance to take effect and

to let the people settle into their posi- tions before taking on an additional workload. Right now, we are probably

looking at January of 1982

before we actually get more

involved in this project.
"We have also been making major

efforts in the establishment of name

authority headings through the Name

Authority Cooperative Project of the

Library of Congress. So far this year, we

have added 4,269 headings; and, since, the inception of the project in October

of 1977, over 22,000 headings have

been contributed by GPO to the LC

MARC File, and the OCLC Name Authority File. We expect even more to be

contributed in Fiscal Year 1982.

"GPO will also begin a cooperative

cataloging project for audio-visual materials this October. During the past year we have talked with the Library of Congress and the National Audio-Visual

Center; and procedures have been

worked out for GPO to catalog about

600 audio-visual items a year. This

project advances our efforts for transferring cataloging responsibility from

LC to GPO just one step further. "And, while we are not yet at the stage to become the national authority

for subject cataloging, discussions with

Library of Congress are continuing in this area also. We do not have an implementation date for this at the present

time." Ms. Bernadine Hoduski, Professional

Staff Member for Library and Distribution Services, JCP, brought Council

members up to date on a number of

projects. "We are automating the Congress/ona/ Record Index; and I am

pleased to say that we are very close

to the first step. GPO put together a detailed functional statement and they

worked very closely with the Congressional Record Index Office. We came up

with a very thick proposal. The Automation Committee has voted to accept

that, and has requested the Joint Committee on Printing to poll its members

to see if they would support the first step. The first step would be putting the Record up in a data base and having

it available on-line to the indexers. This

would considerably speed up the pro- duction of the Index itself which you

receive; and it would cut down dramatically on the cost of maintaining the Index."

Mr. Kenyon C. Rosenberg, Chief,

Policy and Planning Office, National

Technical Information Service, reviewed

developments at NTIS. "The Govern- ment Printing and NTIS are cross- announcing each others' items that are appropriate to the interest specifically of NTIS. That is in the science and tech- nology areas, which means what is for sale by GPO in paper will be available

for sale by NTIS in microfiche.

"From the standpoint of archival

service, though, it becomes more inter- esting. Because once GPO docks the

item we have already selected for sale

in microfiche, we will announce it again;

and it will be available in paper or fiche from NTIS in perpetuity. So you don't have to go to the National Archives for that kind of material. "The new thing that we have will begin January 1, 1982, will enable

people that have, or organizations that

have, GPO deposit accounts, or NTIS

deposit accounts, to order against one

deposit account for documents from

the other agency. So that if you have

a GPO deposit account, you may order

NTIS documents against that deposit account. "The only caveat is that you will have

to place your order through GPO be- cause we have a problem with the deposit account numbers; there are some

similarities. So the deposit account number has to be verified by the agency

that holds the deposit account; but the same is true again if you are an NTIS

holder; you can order GPO documents

against your NTIS deposit account

should you so desire, but it must come

through NTIS first, which will put about

a day or two delay on your order; but you can use that specific deposit account."

Mr. Robert A. Davis, Assistant to the

Director for Acquisitions and Overseas

Development, Library of Congress,

spoke about the cooperation taking

place between LC and the technical re- port community. "As you know, there are national level bibliographic records

which exist for books, serials, maps,

audio-visual materials, authorities, and

music. Not all of these have been published, but they have been completed.

"What we are attempting to do right now is to add to these various formats

data that would be appropriate for technical reports. So, I would like to make

it very clear because there has been some misunderstanding; we are not de- veloping a new format for technical

reports. Basically, what we are beginning with is book format to see what

elements need to be added to that. Also, we have met with GPO and others to discuss these elements that need to be

added to the various formats.

"One of the primary things that is being discussed in seeing if we can get some agreement, is seeing how these

elements should be coded. And what I mean by that is which of them should

be designated as absolutely mandatory

and have to appear in the record; and

which of them are optional, which are mandatory if applicable, etc." These are only a few of the many

"highlights" of a very full Council meeting. A more comprehensive coverage has been sent out to depository librar- ies in the form of a summary by the

Council Secretary, Mrs. Nancy Johnson, along with the complete transcript on microfiche. Council will meet again

during the Spring in Boston, Massachusetts, at the Boston Park Plaza

Hotel, with registration and informal

get-together on Sunday, April 25th, and

meetings on the 26th, 27th, and 28th.

Public Documents Highlights is cir- culated bi-monthly by the Superintendent of Documents, Washington, D.C. 20402, and is mailed at first class postage rates. Public Documents Highlights

is intended primarily for librarians of the Federal Depository Library Program.

Material proposed for circulation may

be submitted to the Editor, Public

Documents Highlights, Library and

Statutory Distribution Service, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. 20401. The Superintendent of Documents, however, retains the right to accept such material, to edit it, and

to assign priorities of circulation.

4
GPO RESPONDS TO DEPOSITORY

LIBRARY COUNCIL RESOLUTIONS

RESOLUTIONS APPROVED BY THE DEPOSITORY LIBRARY

COUNCIL TO THE PUBLIC PRINTER 4/15/81 WITH THE

RESPONSES OF THE SUPERINTENDENT OF DOCUMENTS

9/28/81

1. In order to bolster the Regional depository libraries' capabilities to serve their state missions and in order

to assure that Federal documents are available through- out the United States on an equal and expeditious basis, the Depository Library Council recommends that the

Public Printer investigate the feasibility of requiring each

state to prepare a plan to coordinate the Federal docu- ments depository program within that state. The plan should be developed through consultation with all desig- nated Federal depository libraries within the state and

should address ail depository responsibilities outlined

in the /nstruct/ons to DeposAory Libraries as well as the concerns expressed through the Regional Depository

Library Survey presented to the Depository Library Council at the first afternoon session of the Spring

1981 meeting.

We recognize the diverse needs of individual states for

effective Regional depository services, and, In some in- stances, more active selective depository support of those services. The Public Printer also recognizes that under current economic and budgetary pressures, a broader interpretation of Title 44, allowing states to cooperate more fully by sharing depository responsibilities, is needed at this time. Having had an opportunity

to examine plans for Depository Service in Missouri and

New Jersey, which entailed much work and careful thought about the special needs of those states, we feel that in states lacking Regional depositories, such as

Missouri, or in states desiring to strengthen existing

Regional depository services, as in New Jersey, these

plans have genuine merit. Therefore, we wish to go on

record as encouraging depositories in states that have

need of such plans to undertake them. To assist in this, and to provide two approaches for creating such plans, we will distribute copies of the plans for Missouri and

for New Jersey to all depository libraries.

2. The Depository Library Council recommends that the

Public Printer review the forthcoming GODORT report

based on the draft version presented to Council by the Committee on Regional Depositories of the Depository

Library Work Group of the Federal Documents Task

Force (ALA/GODORT) and include consideration of the Committee's findings in responding to Recommendation

No. 1. A formal GODORT report on Regional Depositories was

never received. However, GODORT has communicated

to GPO its support of Council resolutions 1, 2, 4, 5, 6,

8, and 17, which deal with Regional depository problems

and recommendations.

3. Inasmuch as Public Law 96-511, the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980, places responsibility for Federal in- formation resources management with the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs within the Office of Management and Budget, the Depository Library Council requests that the Public Printer place the following

resolution on record with the aforementioned Office:

The Depository Library Council recognizes and appreci- ates the fundamental roles played by the Government

Printing Office and the Depository Library System in disseminating governmentally produced information and making it freely available to the American people.

Continued and unimpeded vigorous pursuit of these

roles is vital to representative government and the democratic process. We have implemented the resolution. This resolution has been formally communicated by Mr. Sawyer to Mr. Stockman at 0MB in a letter dated September 16, 1981.

4. 44 U.S.C. 1912 gives the Superintendent of Documents

the authority to allow regional depositories to discard depository publications. Therefore, the Depository Li- brary Council recommends that the Superintendent of Documents authorize that Regionals need only retain material for their Standard Federal Region (as described

in the Directory of Federal Regional Structure) when

that material is offered in a series by geographic break- down (i.e., Flood Insurance Studies, Soil Surveys, Water

Resources Data), with the following commitments:

a. After five years material may be discarded after being offered to all Regionals and then publicized to selectives in those Federal Regions.

b. All depository material retained, of the nature de- scribed above, must be made available on inter- library loan to depositories nationwide. We will allow Regional Depository Libraries to limit their retention of material offered in a series by geographical

breakdown, to that of their Standard Federal Region as

long as one Regional in the Standard Federal Region

agrees to continue to hold all material in this category. For purposes of the Depository Library Program, the Standard Federal Region is that outlined on page 1 of the United States Directory of Federal Regional Structure, 1981/1982. The Regional Depository Library that agrees to hold all depository material in this category

must submit to GPO a letter stating that fact. The re- maining Regional libraries in the SFR must submit to GPO a written agreement signed by the Library Director, committing themselves to adhering to the following

policies.

a. All material to be discarded (over 5 years old, in a

series by geographical breakdown) must first be of- fered to all Regional libraries.

b. After offering the material to the Regionals it must

then be offered to selective depositories in that Standard Federal Region.

c. Regionals entering into this agreement will provide

depository materials relating to their Standard Federal Region on interlibrary loan to all depositories.

This procedure will not be implemented until the Regional in the SFR has been identified and submitted

the written agreement. A list of titles in this category

will be provided to the Regional libraries at that time. Any Regional desiring to continue to hold all material should feel free to do so.

5. The Depository Library Council recommends that the Superintendent of Documents seek authorization under

44 U.S.C. 1914 from the Joint Committee on Printing to allow Regional depositories the option to receive selectively, publications for only their Standard Federal

5
Region (as described in the Directory of Federal Regional Structure) when that material is offered in a

series by geographic breakdown (i.e., Flood Insurance

Studies, Soil Surveys, Water Resources Data), with the commitment that those publications must be made

available on interlibrary loan to depositories nationwide. We have sought endorsement of the concept outlined

in this resolution from the Joint Committee on Printing to allow Regional depositories the option of receiving

selectively, publications for only Standard Federal Re- gion (as defined in the United States Directory of Federal Regional Structure 1981/1982, page 1) when that material is offered in a series by geographical break- down (i.e., Flood Insurance Studies, Soil Surveys, Water

Resources Data, etc.). This concept was suggested in August 1981 for the distribution of Census Bureau Block

Statistics paper maps. Distributing material to Regionals in this manner is seen as a positive economic move

to reduce depository expenditures and assist regional

depository libraries by helping to alleviate storage and

retrieval problems.

6. The Depository Library Council recommends that when

there is more than one Regional depository serving a

state, the Superintendent of Documents allow those Regionals to arrange cooperatively for the receipt, service,

and permanent retention of Federal Depository material. This resolution needs further review. We will provide a response at a later date.

7. The Depository Library Council requests that the draft revision of the GUIDELINES FOR THE DEPOSITORY

LIBRARY SYSTEM be printed and distributed as a sup- plement to the "Administrative Notes" for general

comment.

We will print and distribute the draft revision of the GUIDELINES FOR THE DEPOSITORY LIBRARY SYSTEM

as a supplement to ADMINISTRATIVE NOTES for general comment when it is completed by Council. The date

for such distribution will be after this meeting, since the Council's Depository Library Systems Committee

is still working on the draft.

8. The Depository Library Council recommends that the

List of Superintendent of Documents Classification Which may be Discarded be adopted, printed, and dis- tributed as an appendix to the Instructions for Depository Libraries no later than July 1, 1981. The List of Superintendent of Documents Classification which may be Discarded, or the "Superseded List," was

distributed on shipping list 16,343 on August 19, 1981. We wish to thank the librarians who compiled it: Anne

Diamond, Clyde Hordusky, John B. Phillips, Janis

Pivarnik, and Pat Sloan.

9. The Depository Library Council recommends that GPO

consider the following list of documents from the LIST OF CLASSES for conversion to microfiche-only format

for depository distribution, and that GPO establish a

priority from this list, based on cost-effectiveness to GPO operation. When other conversions of items to microfiche-only format for depository distribution are being considered, the Depository Library Council rec- ommends that it again be consulted as to the advisability and impact of the conversion on depository library functions. (See Appendix A for listings.) We appreciate the Council's recommendation of titles

from the LIST OF CLASSES for conversion to a microfiche-only format for depository distribution. Only one

title, "Military Standards," (D 7.10:-) did not fit the approved microfiche conversion policy guideline and will remain in paper.

10. The Depository Library Council recommends that all publications offered in paper copy to the public in the GPO Sales Program continue to be offered for depository

selection in paper copy, except when a title is included

in the attached list of microfiche-only format (Appendix A).

Appendix A: Listing of Documents to be Considered for Conversion to Microfiche-only Format (Council Resolution No. 9)

Y 1.4/1 thru 9: Public Bills and Resolutions (House 1006

and Senate) C 55.12: Federal Coordinator for Meteorologi- 250-E

cal Sen/ices and Supporting Re- search (FCM series) C 55.13: NOAA Technical Reports: —EDIS (series) 208-C-l —ERL (series) 208-C-2 —NESS (series) 208-C-3 —NMFS (series) 208-C-4 —NOS (series) 208-C-5 —NWS (series) 208-C-6 —OOE (series) 208-C-8

C 55.13/2: NOAA Technical Memorandums: —EDIS (series) 208-C-4 —ERL (series) 208-C-l —NESS (series) 208-C-2 —NMFS (series) 208-C-3 —NOS (series) 208-C-5 —NWS (series) 208-C-6

D 7.10: Military Standards 314-J D 103.24/4: Waterways Experiment Station: Mis- 334-A-7

cellaneous papers (numbered) D 103.42/8: Coastal Engineering Research Cen- 334-A-20

ter: Miscellaneous Reports (series) D 103.53: Construction Engineering Research 335-A

Laboratory; Technical Reports D 103.57: IWR Contract Reports (numbered) 337-B-3

D 210.8: NRL Reports (numbered) 407-H

D 210.15: ONR Report ACR-(series) 407-D

D 210.109: NORDA Reports (numbered) 407-G

D 301.45/46-2: Air Force Flight Dynamics Laboratory: 422-B

AFFDL-TR (series) E 1.10: Conference (series) 429-E

E 1.16/2: Environmental Readiness Documents 429-H DOE/ERD (series) E 1.28: Contractor Research and Develop- 429-T-4

ment Reports E 1.30: Resource Applications RA (series) 429-T-7 EP 1.17: Solid Waste Management Series, SW 431-1-7

(numbered) EP 1.21/9: Research Reports, National Environ- 431-1-68

mental Research Center, Las Vegas EP 1.23: Ecological Research Series 431-1-11

(numbered) EP 1.23/2: Environmental Protection Technology 431-1-12

Series (numbered) EP 1.23/4: Environmental Health Effects Re- 431-1-23

search Series (numbered) EP 1.23/5: Environmental Monitoring Series 431-1-24

(numbered) EP 1.23/6: Miscellaneous (numbered series) 431-J
EP 1.45: EP 1.78: EP 2.26: EP 5.15/2 EP 5.15/3 EP 6.10/3

EP 6.10/4 EP 6.10/6 EP 6.10/7 EP 6.10/8

EP 6.10/9

EP 6.13: HE 20.4109:

HE 20.4114/2

HE 20.4310:

HE 20.4310/2

EP 1.23/8: Interagency Energy-Environment Re- search and Development Reports (numbered) Comprehensive Planning Series Technical Reports

Technical Studies Report (TS series) TSCA Chemical Assessment Series TSCA Economic Analysis Series Technical Note ORP/CSD (Criteria and Standards Division) (series) EPA/ORP (series) Technical Note ORP/LV (series) Technical Note ORP/TAD (series) Technical Note ORP/EAD (series) ORP (Office of Radiation Programs)

Contract Reports

Technical Reports BRH/NERHL (Northeastern Radiological Health Laboratory Series) Report of the Division of Biological

Effects FDA Medical Device Standards Publications (series) FDA Medical Device Standards Publication Technical Report FDA-T

(series) NAS 1.55: Conference Publications NASA CP

(series) TD 1.109/13: Aircraft Accident Reports, Brief For- mat U.S. Civil Aviation NTSB-BA

(series) TD 1.109/16: Report NTSB-AMM (series) TD 1.112: Aircraft Accident Reports (NTSB- AAR series) TD 1.112/2: Special Investigation Report Series TD 1.112/3: Railroad Accident Reports NTSB-RAR

(series) TD 1.112/4: Railroad/Highway Accident Report NTSB-RHR (series) TD 1.112/5: Railroad Accident Reports Brief For- mat NTSB-RAB (series) TD 1.116: Marine Accident Reports NTSB-MAR

(series) TD 1.117: Highway Accident Reports TD 117/2: Highway Accidents Reports, Brief Format NTSB-HAB (series) TD 1.118: Pipeline Accident Reports NTSB-PAR

(series) TD 1.120: Special Studies NTSB (series) TD 2.30: FWHA-RD Report (series) TD 2.30/4: FHA Reports FHWA-TS (series) TD 2.30/5: Report FHWA/PL (series) TD 2.30/6: Report FHWA-HO (series) TD 2.30/7: Report FHWA-OEP/HEV (series) TD 4.32/6: FAA-EM Reports TD 4.32/7: Report FAA-ED (series) TD 4.32/8: FAA-EE Reports TD 4.32/9: FAA-E Reports TD 4.32/10: FAA-QS Reports TD 4.32/11: FAA-AVP Reports TD 4.32/12: FAA-C Reports TD 4.32/14: Reports FAA-ASP (series) TD 4.32/15: Report of FAA-AP (series) TD 4.32/17: FAA-MS (series) TD 4.210: AM-(series) Y 3.N88:10 Reports NUREG (series) Y 3.N88:25/ Contractor Reports NUREG/CR

(series)

431-1-62

431-1-28 431-L-3 473-A-8 473-B-7

473-B-9

431-1-13

421-

431- 431-

431-

-21

-61

-61

-61 431-L-13

431-1-78 498-B-5

498-B-ll

499-L-2

499-L-2

830-H-lO

982-1-3

982-1-16

982-1-9

982-1-9 982-1-11

982-1-14

982-1-19

982-1-21

982-1-20

982-1-20

982-1-10

982-1-23 982-G-ll 982-G-19

982-G-21

982-G-29

982-G-32

431-A-20

431-A-33 431-A-20

431-A-25 431-A-19

431-A-24

431-A-22 421-A-29

431-A-28

431-A-38

431-E-4 1051-H-2

1051-H-ll

Y 1.4/1 thru 9: Public Bills and Resolutions (House 1006

and Senate) Resolution Number 10 listed several publications sold

in paper with the recommendation that they continue to be offered in paper to depository libraries. Many docu- ments in the GPO Sales Program, such as publications

of a popular nature, reference works, and periodicals

will remain in paper copy for distribution to depository

libraries. However, under present Congressional guidelines, we must continue to review each document published in paper format as to its suitability for conversion

to microfiche consistent with the policy on "Format of Publications Distributed to Depository Libraries."

11. The Depository Library Council recommends that realistic guidelines for the handling and storage of microfiche be developed by GPO and included in the IN- STRUCTIONS FOR DEPOSITORY LIBRARIES. We agree on Number 11, guidelines for the handling and

storage of microfiche have been developed by GPO and

will be included as an appendix in the revised INSTRUCTIONS FOR DEPOSITORY LIBRARIES. Distribution of the appendix will be made to depositories after this meeting.

12. The Depository Library Council recommends that GPO's

production of microfiche be done in a timely manner

and that distribution be made with adequate finding

aids. GPO should recognize that the depository function

of availability is defeated if microfiche are unduly de- layed or finding aids are difficult to use. Our production of microfiche is continuing to undergo

enhancements making for more timely distribution with

better finding aids. Refinements to the Bill Finding Aid requested by the

Council, were incorporated in the product in April 1981. We will continue to monitor closely both microfiche and

finding aids with an eye to possible improvements, and

will continue to welcome suggestions from librarians.

13. The Depository Library Council recommends the inclu- sion of military specifications in the depository program

in microfiche-only format. We have completed an economic analysis on the conversion and distribution of military specifications to a

microfiche-only format.

It is our conclusion that this material will not be costeffective in a microfiche format, due to the very low number of pages per specification.

14. The Depository Library Council recommends that GPO

separate the item numbers for Congressional Committee Prints from the item numbers for Congressional

Committee Hearings so that a depository library may

select either series in either print or microfiche format. We have a problem with this resolution. After taking

into careful consideration the cost factors involved with

creating 84 new item numbers and resurveying libraries for Congressional material, we have decided against

implementing this recommendation. We feel the costs

to be excessive and resources would be better utilized distributing new material, previously unavailable.

15. The Depository Library Council recommends that GPO

consider separately subseries within a class number

7
and omit from microfiche conversion any title which

in itself is unsuitable for such conversion.

In order to more appropriately apply our distribution format policy to all titles, we will subdivide large series of documents by subseries within a class number. Any

title which does not fall within the established criteria for conversion, will remain in paper. Such decisions are

of vital concern and will be given careful consideration

by the Library Division's new Classification Specialist.

16. The Depository Library Council commends the Govern- ment Printing Office on (1) the progress made to date toward the objective of providing a comprehensive master catalog of U.S. government publications and (2) the

efforts which it has made toward defining a cataloging

project which will provide the government publications user community with a comprehensive standardized

system of access, both bibliographic and subject, to all government publications. The Council further com- mends GPO on its leadership role in this regard. The

Council, recommends that GPO continue to provide the

leadership in (1) the coordination of input from other government agencies involved in this project and (2) the development of an overall master plan. The Council also recommends that the GPO give the highest priority to

this vital undertaking, and that it provide a progress

report on this project at the next meeting of Council. We appreciate the support evidenced in this Resolution

and we are continuing to work towards this goal. A contract has been issued through NTIS to a private consultant which should get this project moving again. A

meeting between the consultant and representatives of the scientific and technical agencies, GPO and Library

of Congress, was held two weeks ago as a first step.

17. The Depository Library Council requests the further consideration of DARP for Regional and 100% selective depositories. We request that estimates be provided on

the number of new cataloging records that would occur

in the first and second year of an automated cataloging

project, and an initial and recurring cost estimate for Regionals and 100% selectives planning to participate

in the project.

18. The Depository Library Council requests that GPO continue its discussions with OCLC on DARP for less than

100% selectives, in particular to determine a method

of providing OCLC with current item selection data so

that holding symbols can be maintained and dis- played with the OCLC cataloging records for Federal Documents.

Resolutions number 17 and 18 both relates to DARP. We have been in contact with OCLC concerriing continuing development on DARP. On August 18, GPO and

OCLC representatives met in Columbus, Ohio, to further

this effort. OCLC's position on this matter will be ad- dressed by Chris Grabenstatter in her presentation tomorrow. (Response to both 17 and 18 are the same)

19. The Depository Library Council requests that GPO ask

OCLC to display "GPO" on the "menu" of truncated

records, in the same way in which it displays "DLC".

We have implemented this Resolution. OCLC has begun

a "Project initiation" for securing the designation

"GPO" on the menu of truncated records on multi-find

search. It will appear much the same way that "DLC"

currently appears on the system.

20. The Depository Library Council recommends that GPO

continue to investigate the feasibility of creating a brief, temporary machine-readable record at the time the Shipping List is produced. We recommend that GPO use this information to create an interim finding aid, in the form

of a monthly and quarterly cumulated list, to provide more immediate access to distributed but uncataloged

publications. The cumulated lists should be arranged in SuDocs class order, including the title and item number,

as well as providing alphabetical title, title key word,

and item number indexes. Council further recommends

that GPO discuss with OCLC the possibility of placing

this temporary record in the OCLC data base and on the GPO tapes until the complete bibliographic record is provided.

We recognize the value of a skeletal record generated

at the time the Shipping List is compiled and made

readily available to the library community. We have

begun discussions regarding the matter in-house as well as with OCLC and L.C. Kay Baily will provide you additional information on this subject tomorrow.

21. In the interests of cooperative cataloging among gov- ernment agencies. Council requests that GPO encourage NTIS to participate in LC's Cooperative Name Authority

Project.

We have been continuing our discussions with L.C. and

NTIS regarding bibliographic control. A meeting was

held and the two agencies exchanged "Name Authority

Project" data. This item will be addressed by representatives from the agencies in their remarks tomorrow.

22. The Depository Library Council requests that GPO es- tablish and publicize procedures to acquire, classify,

catalog, and distribute expeditiously those publications

which have been identified by depository libraries and

have not been distributed by GPO or included in the Monthly Catalog. If GPO has any restrictions on material which they either will not distribute or add to the Monthly Catalog, these should be communicated to the

Council and depository libraries. We agree with you on Resolution 22 and, a draft policy statement detailing GPO procedures for the acquisition,

classification, cataloging, and distribution for publica- tions not distributed by GPO or included in Monthly

Catalog is being written. As soon as we have draft

policy statements we will provide them for review.

23. Recognizing the difficulties of continuing the Monthly

Catalog as a presentation of the complete data base of U.S. Government publications because:

a. It has become too large to produce and to make

available in a timely fashion;

b. It has become too expensive for both the producer

and the subscriber;

c. It has become so unwieldy that it is less frequently

used as a reference source; and

d. It has become less used as a source of cataloging

copy.

We recommend that GPO investigate the acceptability of printed and microform products from the Monthly
Catalog master data base in lieu of the present Monthly

Catalog. Council recommends consideration of the following options, among others: PRINTED CATALOG OPTIONS

a. Reformat the present contents of the Monthly Cat- log to save space by presenting the records in paragraph form.

b. Produce a printed catalog of abridged records,

containing the following data elements: authors,

titles, subtitles, stock number, SuDocs classifica- tion number, item number, series/report number,

subject headings, collation. MICROFORM CATALOG OPTION

Catalog to be issued in two sections:

a. The Register, in which each month's new publica- tions are arranged in SuDocs classification order and listed with full bibliographic data;

b. The Indexes, which would include all of the currently produced indexes and brief bibliographic

description consisting of the author, title, item

number, pagination, series, report number,

SuDocs classification number, and a reference to the record in Section A. This index section should cumulate throughout the year, with annual indexes

cumulating up to a five-year period. Council recommends that GPO solicit additional options

from other user groups. Council further recommends

that GPO distribute a questionnaire to recipients of the Monthly Catalog, soliciting their preference among the

feasible options.

We have been actively pursuing approaches for improving the Monthly Catalog. As a first step, we are evaluating a number of options regarding the reformatting of contents. Samples of these options are provided in your

notebook. Implementation of any one of these will de- crease the size and thus the costs associated with

production.

A second step, will be to change the actual format

in which Monthly Catalog is issued. Various microfiche options are under consideration.

[The Office of Superintendent of Documents Issued a

Policy Statement, 8/21/81, on "Format of Publications

Distributed to Depository Libraries." The text Is as

follows.]

Policy.

Publications will be sent to depository libraries in either paper or microfiche format. Distribution will be made

in microfiche rather than paper format, whenever possible, to minimize the cost of printing and binding and

help alleviate space problems in depository libraries. Documents published by Federal agencies in microfiche

will be distributed to depository libraries in that format. Documents published in paper format will be reviewed

for suitability for conversion to microfiche. Primary considerations will be the physical characteristics of a publication, the nature of its content, and its relationship

to other publications. Consistency of format and maintenance of the usability of depository collections will be

continuing objectives.

Types of publications which usually will not be con- verted to microfiche are:

a. Publications whose physical characteristics would

make them unusable in microfiche or which would

not be cost-effective to convert. These include publications containing 14 pages or less (unless one

of a series when the series is already in microfiche); maps/foldouts or any publication that ex- ceed the height of 11"; brochures and flyers; posters and charts; publications requiring updates

and inserts (except cumulations); publications in which color or half tones are essential to use; publications having characters smaller than 6

point or containing a large percentage of illegible characters; publications using paper other than

white; publications having continuous tone photographs; hand written documents; prints from office copiers.

b. Publications of a popular nature intended for the

general public, the homeowner, senior citizens,

etc.;

c. Standard reference works;

d. Periodicals in a magazine or newsletter style.

Scope.

This policy pertains to all U.S. Government documents

subject to distribution to Federal Depository Libraries.

Application.

a. This policy will be applied in the following manner,

based on the way in which documents are issued:

(1) Serials. Serials are publications issued in successive parts, usually bearing a numerical or chronological designation, and intended to be continued

indefinitely. A decision to distribute a serial in microfiche format will apply to all future issues. Serials may be divided into three categories:

(a) Monographic series. These are groups of publications related to one another by the fact that each item bears, in addition to its own

title, a collective title applying to the group as

a whole. Series may be numbered or unnumbered. Earlier numbers of numbered series will not usually be converted.

(b) Periodicals. These are dated publications is- sued three or more times a year. Conversion

of a periodical will begin with the first issue

of the volume or year.

(c) Semiannual, annual, and biennial publications.

(2) Monographs. Monographs are defined as publica- tions complete in one part or a finite number of separate parts. An individual decision as to distri- bution format will be required for each monograph.

b. The Chief, Library Division, is responsible for the appli- cation of this policy. Exceptions to this policy may be

allowed under provisions of SOD 52, Depository Short- ages. Exceptions must be approved by the Chief, Library

Division, or his/her designated representative.

9
Our Best Effort!

[New Englanders have a reputation for willingness to organize in a good cause. The latest example of this comes from

the New England Library Information

Network (N ELI NET) which is going all- out to make the public aware of the Depository Library Program. Perhaps

other regions of the United States would like to follow suit! And remember to keep your "Best Efforts" coming

to the Editor for HIGHLIGHTS readers.]

Statement on Nefinet

Government Documents

Task Group's Public

Awareness Campaign

in New England

starting this fall the Nelinet Govern- ment Documents Task Group will launch

a public awareness campaign in New

England on behalf of the Federal Depositary Library Program. GODORT has

designated this a pilot project for the

whole country, and the Task Group is asking nationwide support from the de- pository library community. The campaign will be designed by Ad Lab, the award-winning student-run model advertising agency of the Boston University School of Public Communication.

The campaign will stress the infor- mation services which depository librar- ies provide free to the public. The target

audience includes nonprofit organizations and smaller businesses concerned

with energy and the environment, housing and health, consumer and other

public interests. The Task Group hopes

thereby to attract new users of documents who will become vocal fans of the Depository Library Program. The

knowledge gained and printed materials produced will be made widely

available to the library/ information

community.

GODORT has allocated $500 for support of the project. In June, LeRoy 0. Schwarzkopf, Head Documents Librarian at the University of Maryland, received the 19S1 CIS/GODORT/ALA

Documents to the People Award. He has

designated the Task Group as the re- cipient of the $1,000 stipend for use in the campaign. NCLIS Executive Director

Toni Bearman has also offered her en- thusiastic support.

Librarians who wish to help get the

campaign underway may do so in two

important ways:

(1) Contribute copies of any bro- chures, flyers, ads, handouts, biblio- graphies and other materials they employ to publicize their documents col- lection and to help patrons make use

of it. These are needed to help acquaint

the Ad Lab organization with the depository program and the services it offers. (2) Write brief accounts of one or more reference success stories, especially cases in which they have assisted

individuals or organizations in the target

audience to acquire information needed

for carrying out projects. Ad Lab needs

examples to illustrate the usefulness of the program for feature stories to be

placed in journals and other publica- tions read by the target audience. A

couple of sentences will suffice. Example: A small nursing home in the Boston

area wants to make its use of electric power more cost- and energy-efficient.

The documents staff at the Tufts University Library were able to locate useful data in NCHS, OTA and DOE publications, and to make referrals to helpful federal and state offices. Example:

In another case at Tufts, a researcher

under contract to a Government agency

to design a statistical model for analyzing unemployment patterns in Massachusetts received valuable assistance in accessing data in Census, BLS and state documents. Users of the information

should be people in the "real" world, so regular student and faculty research

projects will not be used. Names of people and organizations may be withheld

if necessary to preserve confidentiality.

NELINET welcomes suggestions,

comments, questions and words of encouragement. All correspondence

should be addressed to: David 0. Heisser, Documents Librarian, Tufts

University Library, Medford, MA 02155.

Tel. (617) 628-5000 ext. 388.

Document Review

[HIGHLIGHTS welcomes short reviews

by depository librarians of significant recent documents. Just send them

typed double spaced to the Editor. Our

most recent contribution is by Linda

Williamson, Documents Librarian, \'. n- derbilt University Library.]

/Wore Hurdles to Clear: Women and

Girls in Competitive Athletics. By the United States Commission on Civil Rights. (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Govern- ment Printing Office, 1980.) Pp. 87.

Paper. $4.00. CR 1.10:63. Item No. 228-A-l. (Available through GPO

Bookstores, Stock Number 005-000-

00243-5.)

"No person in the United States

shall, on the basis of sex, be excluded

from participation in, be denied the

benefits of, or be subjected to discrimi- nation under any education program or

activity receiving Federal financial assistance."

Thus reads Title IX of the Education

Amendments of 1972. Why, almost a decade after its enactment, are there more hurdles to clear? One of the greatest stumbling blocks

is that, historically, women have not

participated on an equal basis with men

in most major social institutions. Title IX's principal impact relates to participation by females in athletics; and the

first chapter of More Hurdles to Clear presents an historical overview. In the

Victorian era, women were expected to be frail, delicate, and passive; even the

clothing of the day inhibited athletic participation. During the latter part of the Nineteenth Century, women's col- leges successfully developed team

sports programs; however, these de- clined dramatically after the turn of the

century. Physical educators became

convinced that competitive sports would

be injurious to women's health, and

that such competition was "unladylike." The philosophy which continued

into the 1960's was that all women

should participate in sports, but that none should be favored by special competitive opportunities.

10
The enactment of Title IX in 1972

promised dramatic changes for the

highly skilled female athlete. However,

the Department of Health, Education,

and Welfare did not issue its implementing regulations until 1975. The

second chapter of this publication

gives a concise analysis of the regulation, which is reprinted in full in the appendices.

Educational institutions were allowed

three years to bring their athletic pro- grams into full compliance with Title IX. That this was not done in many schools

is evidenced by the large number of complaints received by HEW subsequent to the 1978 date for compliance.

This prompted HEW to issue a policy

interpretation, intended to provide a framework for complaints. A reprint of

this 1979 issuance also appears in the appendices.

More Hurdles to Clear presents an

analysis of the present situation vis-a- vis female participation in competitive

athletics in high schools and colleges,

contrasting it with male participation.

In brief, there are four times as many

female college athletes now than ten years ago; but women represent only

27.4% of college athletes, men comprising 72.6%. The number of sports

available to college women has in- creased 100% in the last five years, now being 5.0 per college. However, men may choose from an average of 7.4 sports per college: 48% more than

those available to women.

Several statistical breakdowns are presented for intercollegiate athletic budgets; all indicating disproportionate

expenditures favoring male athletes (up

to as much as 143.8% more per capita

for males than for females). The popular justification for such a disparity is that some male sports are revenue- producing; however, statistics cited show that two-thirds of men's athletic programs fail to generate sufficient rev- enues to cover their expenses; further- more, the percentage would be greater

if not for the fact that half of the insti- tutions collect mandatory athletic events fees from students at the time

of registration.

Much of the information which is

analyzed in the text is presented graphically: through tables, line charts, bar

and pie graphs. A humorous touch is added by use of apropos "Peanuts" and

"Doonesbury" comic strips.

The Commission on Civil Rights has

presented a thorough and highly read- able analysis of women and girls in competitive athletics, with the focus on changes brought about by Title IX. It is to be hoped that a follow-up study in the not too distant future may appropriately be titled: All Hurdles Cleared!

"Outstanding

Reference Source"

Citation for

PRF & EPRF!

Depository Librarians have been say- ing for a long time that the GPO Sales

Publications Reference File (PRF) and

its companion Exhausted GPO Sales

Publications File (EPRF) are reference

tools they could not do without. Some

have even asked, "How did we ever get

along before PRF & EPRFV

Now even wider recognition has been

forthcoming. The American Library Association's Reference and Adult Services Division, through its Outstanding

Reference Sources Committee, has

cited PRF and EPRF as being an "Out- standing Reference Source." A report on this citation appears in the magazine RQ (Reference Quarterly) for Sum- mer 1981, on page 363. They go on to describe PRF and EPRF as follows: "A microfiche catalog of all publica- tions currently available for sale by the Superintendent of Documents, the PRF

serves as a combination Books in Print and Forthcoming Books for U.S. Gov- ernment publications. The PRF is issued

only in microfiche; a complete new cu- mulation is produced bimonthly with

a supplement issued on alternative months. Access points are provided in three separate sequences: GPO stock

number. Superintendent of Documents

classification number, and an alphabetical interfiling of entries by title, subject keywords, personal author names,

agency series, and report numbers. As

Stephen D. Zink pointed out in his re- cent article, 'Putting "Reference" in the

Publication Reference File,' the PRF

provides much more current access

than the Monthly Catalog due to its readily updated format, and it is also the only major document location tool that does not necessitate using a twostep process (from index to entry or

abstract number) in locating the Superintendent of Documents classification number. The Exhausted Sales Publications Reference File (EPRF) contains

titles of more than 25,000 U.S. Govern- ment documents formerly sold by the Superintendent of Documents and was

issued for the first time in 1980 with cumulated supplements to the basic

microfiche set to be published in 1981."

Monthly Catalog

Corner

Actions are underway at GPO's Li- brary Division to reduce the size of the

Monthly Catalog. This does not mean

cutting down on the number of records

in each issue, but reducing the amount

of space required for each entry. A change in the print programs for the Monthly Catalog will allow cataloging information following the title field to continue on the same line rather than

beginning new lines for fields as is the current practice.

This run-together-record sounds a

bit startling at first; but examples were

prepared and presented at the Fall Meeting of the Depository Library Council to the Public Printer. Reactions by

Council members proved favorable. By

permitting fields to follow one another

in the record, a savings of up to 30%

in actual catalog size can be real- ized. The programming changes re- quired will be minor and easily

implemented.

By following this procedure, the size

of the Monthly Catalog can be reduced

without affecting the actual record count and without limiting any of the

current access points or indexes.

11
Document Librarian

Award Nominations

Welcomed

Two prestigious awards in the documents field are seeking nominees. The

Government Documents RouYid Table,

American Library Association, will pre- sent during their 1982 Annual Meeting

in Philadelphia the James Bennett

Childs Award and the CIS/GODORT/

ALA Documents to the People Award.

The James Bennett Childs Award was

established in 1976 and is given "to

honor a person who has made a lifetime and significant contribution to the field of Government documents and their use

in libraries." Such contributions may

have been in any or all fields of documents librarianship. The Award consists of a bronze plaque with the like- ness of James Bennett Childs and is suitably inscribed. The CIS/GODORT/ALA Documents

to the People Award was first given in 1977 and is "to honor an individual and /or library, institution, or other non- commercial group that has most effectively encouraged the use of Federal documents in support of library services." The Award consists of $1,000

to be used in the area of documents

librarianship, but not for personal ad- vantage, and a framed, hand-lettered

plaque.

Nominations should be made in time

to be considered at ALA Midwinter

Meeting, and should be sent, along with

supporting material to:

Ms. Lois Mills, Chairperson

GODORT Awards Committee

Library Western Illinois University

Macomb, Illinois 61455

FALL PARTICIPANTS IN GPO's Depository Library Orientation 12

GPO 866-278