alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2017378EN.01039601.xml

| 9.11.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 378/396 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.11.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 378/396

---

P7_TA(2014)0199

Farm structure surveys and survey on agricultural production methods ***I

European Parliament legislative resolution of 11 March 2014 on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EC) No 1166/2008 on farm structure surveys and the survey on agricultural production methods, as regards the financial framework for the period 2014-2018 (COM(2013)0757 — C7-0390/2013 — 2013/0367(COD))

(Ordinary legislative procedure: first reading)

(2017/C 378/53)

The European Parliament,

The European Parliament

| — | having regard to the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council (COM(2013)0757), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council (COM(2013)0757),

| — | having regard to Article 294(2) and Article 338(1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament (C7-0390/2013), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Article 294(2) and Article 338(1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament (C7-0390/2013),

| — | having regard to Article 294(3) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Article 294(3) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

| — | having regard to Rule 55 of its Rules of Procedure, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Rule 55 of its Rules of Procedure,

| — | having regard to the report of the Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development (A7-0111/2014), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the report of the Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development (A7-0111/2014),

| 1. | Adopts its position at first reading hereinafter set out; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Adopts its position at first reading hereinafter set out;

| 2. | Calls on the Commission to refer the matter to Parliament again if it intends to amend its proposal substantially or replace it with another text; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Calls on the Commission to refer the matter to Parliament again if it intends to amend its proposal substantially or replace it with another text;

| 3. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the national parliaments. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the national parliaments.

---

P7_TC1-COD(2013)0367

Position of the European Parliament adopted at first reading on 11 March 2014 with a view to the adoption of Regulation (EU) No .../2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EC) No 1166/2008 as regards the financial framework for the period 2014-2018

(As an agreement was reached between Parliament and Council, Parliament's position corresponds to the final legislative act, Regulation (EU) No 378/2014.)

---
EXHIBIT 35.1

VW Credit, Inc. Servicer Compliance Statement Under Section 3.9 of the Sale and Servicing Agreement and Item 1123 of Regulation AB





VOLKSWAGEN AUTO LOAN ENHANCED TRUST 2012-1





The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of VW
Credit, Inc. (VCI), as Servicer under the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of January 26, 2012 (as amended and supplemented, or otherwise modified and in effect from time to time, the Sale and Servicing Agreement),
by and among Volkswagen Auto Loan Enhanced Trust 2012-1, as Issuer, Volkswagen Auto Lease/Loan Underwritten Funding, LLC as Seller, VW Credit, Inc., as Servicer, and Citibank, N.A., as Indenture Trustee, does hereby certify that:



| | 1. | A review of the activities of the Servicer during the period from January 1, 2014 through December 31, 2014, and of its performance under the Sale and Servicing Agreement was conducted under my supervision.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Sale and Servicing Agreement in all material respects throughout such period.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate on behalf of the Servicer this twenty-seventh day of March, 2015.



/s/ Horst Meima
Horst MeimaExecutive Vice President & CFO
### §7375. Production of supplies and munitions: hours and pay of laborers and mechanics

During a national emergency declared by the President, the regular working hours of laborers and mechanics of the Department of the Army producing military supplies or munitions are 8 hours a day or 40 hours a week. However, under regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army these hours may be exceeded. Each laborer or mechanic who works more than 40 hours in a workweek shall be paid at a rate not less than one and one-half times the regular hourly rate for each hour in excess of 40.

(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 234, §4025; renumbered §7375, Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, §808(b)(15), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1839.)

| Revised section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 4025 | 5:189a. | July 2, 1940, ch. 508, §4(b), 54 Stat. 714. |

The words "Notwithstanding the provisions of any other law" are omitted as surplusage. The word "producing" is substituted for the words "who are engaged in the manufacture or production". The last sentence is substituted for 5:189a (last 34 words).

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–232 renumbered section 4025 of this title as this section.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2018 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 115–232 effective Feb. 1, 2019, with provision for the coordination of amendments and special rule for certain redesignations, see section 800 of Pub. L. 115–232, set out as a note preceding section 3001 of this title.
#### Michael Lavin, Respondent, v. Degnon Contracting Company, Appellant.

Judgment and order unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Woodward, Jenks, Gaynor, Rich and Miller, JJ.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  PBGC Participant and Plan Sponsor Advocate 
-  Participant and Plan Sponsor Advocate Annual Reports 

This page has not been translated. Please go to PBGC.gov's Spanish home page for more information available in Spanish.

Esta página no ha sido traducida. Por favor vaya a la página principal del sitio de español de PBGC para ver información disponible en español.

# Participant and Plan Sponsor Advocate Annual Reports

The Advocate is statutorily required to submit a report on the Office of the Advocate’s activities by December 31 of each calendar year. This report is submitted concurrently to PBGC’s Congressional Committees of Jurisdiction, the Board of Directors, and the PBGC Director. The Advocate’s Annual Report summarizes participant and plan sponsor requests for assistance, identifies significant problems, and may include specific administrative, legislative, and regulatory recommendations to address issues raised by the Advocate. 

**Current Annual Report**
                          - Appendix I: Advocate Retirement Security Initiative Paper

**Previous Annual Reports**
                          - 2022 Annual Report
                          - 2021 Annual Report
                          - 2020 Annual Report
                          - 2019 Annual Report
                          - 2018 Annual Report                              - Appendix I : De-Risking Study 
                          - 2017 Annual Report                              - Appendix I : De-Risking Study 
                          - 2016 Annual Report
                          - 2015 Annual Report
                          - 2014 Annual Report

December 29, 2023

##           Office of the Advocate      

Overview

Biographies

Retirement Security Initiative

Annual Reports

Issues at a Glance

Issues at a Glance Archive

FAQs
# C_2014042EN.01000501.xml

| 13.2.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 42/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.2.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 42/5

---

Commission information notice pursuant to Article 16(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community

Public service obligations in respect of scheduled air services

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2014/C 42/05)

| Member State | Italy |
| --- | --- |
| Routes concerned | Pantelleria–Trapani and vice versa
  Pantelleria–Palermo and vice versa
  Lampedusa–Palermo and vice versa
  Lampedusa–Catania and vice versa |
| Date of entry into force of the public service obligations | 1 July 2014 |
| Address where the text and any information and/or documentation relating to the public service obligation can be obtained | For further information, please contact:





  Ente nazionale per l’aviazione civile (ENAC) |
| Direzione sviluppo trasporto aereo |
| Viale Castro Pretorio 118 |
| 00185 Roma RM |
| ITALIA |
| Tel. +39 0644596564 |
| Fax +39 0644596591 |
| E-mail: osp@enac.gov.it |
| Internet: http://www.mit.gov.it |
| http://www.enac.gov.it |

Member State

Italy

Routes concerned

Pantelleria–Trapani and vice versa

Pantelleria–Palermo and vice versa

Lampedusa–Palermo and vice versa

Lampedusa–Catania and vice versa

Date of entry into force of the public service obligations

1 July 2014

Address where the text and any information and/or documentation relating to the public service obligation can be obtained

For further information, please contact:

Ente nazionale per l’aviazione civile (ENAC)

Direzione sviluppo trasporto aereo

Viale Castro Pretorio 118

00185 Roma RM

ITALIA

Tel. +39 0644596564

Fax +39 0644596591

E-mail: osp@enac.gov.it

Internet: http://www.mit.gov.it

http://www.enac.gov.it

---
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 381 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                     November 17, 1999.
    Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it shall be in order 
without intervention of any point of order to consider in the House the joint 
resolution (H.J. Res. 80) making further continuing appropriations for the 
fiscal year 2000, and for other purposes. The joint resolution shall be 
considered as read for amendment. The previous question shall be considered as 
ordered on the joint resolution to final passage without intervening motion 
except: (1) one hour of debate equally divided and controlled by the chairman 
and ranking minority member of the Committee on Appropriations; and (2) one 
motion to recommit.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEFEXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.CSS. 1350 ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theAmendment to Annual Report on Form, 10-K (the "Report") of  Boreal Water Collection,Inc. (the "Company"), for the year  ended December 31, 2012 as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Francine Lavoie, President and Chief Executive Officer ofthe Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002, that:

 

1.   TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.   Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operationsof the Company

 

/s/ Francine Lavoie

President, Treasurer,Chief Financial Officer and Chief Executive Officer

August 12, 2013
AMENDMENT TO PROMISSORY NOTE   This Amendment to the Promissory Note (Amendment), by and between NU-MED PLUS, INC., a Utah corporation (the Company) and Smith Corporate Services, Inc. (SCS) and dated September 27, 2013, is entered into on this 5th day of December 2013, on the following terms and conditions:  PREMISES:  A. On September 27, 2013, the Company entered in a promissory note with SCS for $136,600 which consolidated prior loans and advances from SCS to the Company (the Note).  B. Upon review of the advancements and with the Company not requiring an additional advancement of $6,500 from SCS, the Company determined the principal value of the Note had been overstated by $6,500 and the Note should have been for $130,100 instead of $136,600.  B. SCS agrees with the numbers provided by the Company that the total loan was $130,100 since the final advancement or loan from SCS of $6,500 was not required.  Accordingly, the parties want to enter into this Amendment to reflect the actual face value of the Note and the fact the final advancement was not made.  AGREEMENT  NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants of the parties, and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties hereby agree as follows:  1)   Principal Amount. The principal amount of the Note shall be one hundred thirty thousand one hundred dollars ($130,100) instead of the previously listed one hundred thirty six thousand six hundred dollars ($136,600).  2)   Other Inconsistent Provisions Hereby Amended.   Any other provisions of the Agreement  which are inconsistent with the terms of this Amendment described above, shall be deemed to be amended consistent therewith.  All other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect.  3) Ratification. Except as expressly amended hereby, the terms of the Note are hereby ratified and approved as originally written.  -1-       4)     Counterparts.   This Amendment may be executed in multiple counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original and all of which taken together shall be but a single instrument.  Capitalized terms not otherwise defined herein have the meanings given to such terms in the above referenced Note.  IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the corporate parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed by their respective officers, hereunto duly authorized, as of the date first above written.  NU-MED PLUS, INC.  By: /s/Jeffrey L. Robins Name: Jeffrey L. Robins Title: President  Smith Corporate Services, Inc.  By: /s/ Karl Smith A Duly Authorized Officer  -2-
§ 170.201 What is the statutory distribution formula for Tribal shares? ( a ) Tribal shares are determined by using the NTTFI as calculated for fiscal year 2012, and the most recent data on American Indian and Alaska Native population within each Indian Tribe's American Indian/Alaska Native Reservation or Statistical Area, as computed under the Native American Housing Assistance and Self-Determination Act of 1996 (25 U.S.C. 4101 *et seq.*), in the following manner: ( 1 ) 27 percent in the ratio that the total eligible road mileage in each Tribe bears to the total eligible road mileage of all American Indians and Alaskan Natives. For the purposes of this calculation, eligible road mileage will be computed using only facilities included in the inventory described below: ( i ) Were included in the BIA System Inventory prior to October 1, 2004;
( ii ) Are owned by an Indian Tribal government;
( iii ) Are owned by the Bureau of Indian Affairs.
( 2 ) 39 percent in the ratio that the total population in each Tribe bears to the total population of all American Indians and Alaskan Natives; and
( 3 ) 34 percent will be initially divided equally among each BIA Region.
( b ) The share of funds will be distributed to each Indian Tribe within the BIA Region in the ratio that the average total relative need distribution factors and population adjustment factors from fiscal years 2005 through 2011 for a Tribe bears to the average total of relative need distribution factors and population adjustment factors for fiscal years 2005 through 2011 in that region.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Nicholas Pisciotta, Appellant.

[824 NYS2d 643]

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Barbara F. Newman, J.), rendered February 6, 2003, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of assault in the second degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of seven years, unanimously affirmed.

The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence. The evidence established that, among other acts of violence, defendant threw a board at the victim, with the intent to cause physical injury thereby. The evidence, including medical testimony, also warranted the conclusion *(see People v Williams,*84 NY2d 925 [1994]) that some of the victim’s injuries resulted from being struck by the board. We further conclude that these injuries satisfied the requirement of “physical injury” *(see*Penal Law § 10.00 [9]; *People v Guidice,*83 NY2d 630, 636 [1994]).

The challenged portions of the People’s summation did not deprive defendant of a fair trial *(see People v Overlee,*236 AD2d 133 [1997], *lv denied*91 NY2d 976 [1998]; *People v D'Alessandro,*184 AD2d 114, 118-119 [1992], *lv denied*81 NY2d 884 [1993]).

Defendant’s argument concerning jury selection is unpreserved and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. Were we to review this claim, we would reject it on the same grounds upon which we rejected a similar argument on the jointly tried codefendants’ appeal *(People v Oliveri,*29 AD3d 330 [2006], *lv denied*7 NY3d 760, 792 [2006]). Concur—Tom, J.E, Saxe, Friedman, Catterson and McGuire, JJ.
154 So.2d 22

#### Ex parte James R. WILLIAMS.

6 Div. 1000.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

May 30, 1963.

James R. Williams, pro se.

Richmond M. Flowers, Atty. Gen., and John C. Tyson, III, Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondent.

GOODWYN, Justice.

Petitioner, James R. Williams, seeks a writ of mandamus to - be directed to the “Walker County Circuit Court” to do its “public duty in regards to the petition for writ of error coram nobis” filed by petitioner in said court. The petition was filed here on May 3, 1963. Apparently, the relief sought is to require a ruling on Williams’ coram nobis petition filed in said court.

The State has moved to strike the petition for mandamus. The motion is ' well taken.

There has been filed here a copy of the judgment of the circuit court of Walker County rendered on March 28, 1963, dismissing Williams’ petition for coram nobis. The basis for dismissal is the court’s finding that “petitioner has already filed a Writ of Error Coram Nobis proceeding in this Court on, to-wit: January 20, 1962, which was heard on' its merits on, to-wit: May 10, 1962, and that an order was made by this Court on, to-wit: June 15, 1962 denying petitioner’s petition for Writ of Error Cor-am Nobis; and * * * that no new material grounds are alleged in this petition by the petitioner.”

Since the trial court has already taken action on the petition for coram nobis, *264which is the relief sought by the petition for mandamus, the State’s motion to strike the petition for mandamus is due to be granted.

Petition stricken.

LIVINGSTON, C. J., and SIMPSON, MERRILL and HARWOOD, JJ., concur.
#### § 18.103 Which provisions within a tribal probate code require the Department's approval?

Only those tribal probate code provisions regarding the descent and distribution of trust and restricted lands require the Department's approval.
Exhibit 23.1



Consent of Independent Registered Public
Accounting Firm



We consent to the reference to our Firm
under the caption “Interest of Experts” and to the use in this Annual Report on Form 40-F filed with the United States
Securities and Exchange Commission of our reports dated May 15, 2019, with respect to the consolidated statements of financial
position of Just Energy Group Inc. (the “Company”) as at March 31, 2019 and 2018, and the consolidated statements of
income (loss), comprehensive income (loss), changes in shareholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the years in the two-year
period ended March 31, 2019, and the effectiveness of internal controls over financial reporting of the Company as at March 31,
2019.



We also consent to the incorporation by
reference of our reports dated May 15, 2019 in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (No. 333-208131), Form S-8 (333-200194),
Form S-8 (No. 333-183954), Form F-10 (No. 333-222141), Form F-3D (No. 333-188184), with respect to the consolidated statements
of financial position of the Company as at March 31, 2019 and 2018, and the consolidated statements of income (loss), comprehensive
income (loss), changes in shareholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the years in the two-year period ended March 31,
2019, and the effectiveness of internal controls over financial reporting of the Company as at March 31, 2019.







/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
Chartered Professional Accountants
Licensed Public Accountants







Toronto, Canada



May 31, 2019
# C_2006212EN.01001402.xml

| 2.9.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 212/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.9.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 212/14

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Corte Suprema di Cassazione (Italy) lodged on 13 June 2006 — Roby Profumi Srl v Comune di Parma

(Case C-257/06)

(2006/C 212/24)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Corte Suprema di Cassazione

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Roby Profumi Srl

Applicant:

Defendant: Comune di Parma

Defendant:

Question referred

Is Article 10(8) of Law No 713/1986, as amended by Article 9(4) of Legislative Decree No 126/1997, compatible with Article 28 of the EC Treaty and Article 7 of Directive 76/768/EEC (1), as amended by Directive 93/35/EEC (2)?

1

2

---

(1)  OJ L 262 of 27.9.1976.

1

(2)  OJ L 151 of 23.6.1993.

2

---
#### § 211.50 [Reserved]
### §912. Art. 112. Drunkenness and other incapacitation offenses

(a) Drunk on Duty.—Any person subject to this chapter who is drunk on duty shall be punished as a court-martial may direct.

(b) Incapacitation for Duty From Drunkenness or Drug Use.—Any person subject to this chapter who, as a result of indulgence in any alcoholic beverage or any drug, is incapacitated for the proper performance of duty shall be punished as a court-martial may direct.

(c) Drunk Prisoner.—Any person subject to this chapter who is a prisoner and, while in such status, is drunk shall be punished as a court-martial may direct.

(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 72; Pub. L. 114–328, div. E, title LX, §5424, Dec. 23, 2016, 130 Stat. 2947.)

| Revised section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 912 | 50:706. | May 5, 1950, ch. 169, §1 (Art. 112), 64 Stat. 139. |

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2016—Pub. L. 114–328 amended section generally. Prior to amendment, text read as follows: "Any person subject to this chapter other than a sentinel or look-out, who is found drunk on duty, shall be punished as a court-martial may direct."

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2016 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 114–328 effective on Jan. 1, 2019, as designated by the President, with implementing regulations and provisions relating to applicability to various situations, see section 5542 of Pub. L. 114–328 and Ex. Ord. No. 13825, set out as notes under section 801 of this title.
#### § 242.6 Spawning season.

Walleye and northern pike (or pickerel) shall not be taken during their spawning season except for propagation purposes.