alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2014152EN.01002602.xml

| 20.5.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 152/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.5.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 152/26

---

Commission notice pursuant to Article 16(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community

Modification of public service obligations in respect of scheduled air services

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2014/C 152/08)

| Member State | Sweden |
| --- | --- |
| Route concerned | Östersund – Umeå airport |
| Original date of entry into force of the public service obligations | 2 December 1993 |
| Date of entry into force of modifications | 25 October 2015 |
| Address where the text and any relevant information and/or documentation relating to the public service obligation can be obtained | For further information please contact:





  The Swedish Transport Administration |
| SE-781 87 Borlänge |
| SVERIGE |
| Tel. +46 771921921 |
| Internet: www.trafikverket.se |

Member State

Sweden

Route concerned

Östersund – Umeå airport

Original date of entry into force of the public service obligations

2 December 1993

Date of entry into force of modifications

25 October 2015

Address where the text and any relevant information and/or documentation relating to the public service obligation can be obtained

For further information please contact:

The Swedish Transport Administration

SE-781 87 Borlänge

SVERIGE

Tel. +46 771921921

Internet: www.trafikverket.se

---
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

317 CA 11-01301 PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., CARNI, LINDLEY, AND SCONIERS, JJ.

JASON BURLEW, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS, AND RICHARD KATCHUK, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

V ORDER

TALISMAN ENERGY USA INC., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. (APPEAL NO. 1.)

HARRIS BEACH PLLC, ALBANY (JOHN T. MCMANUS OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
WILLIAMSON, CLUNE & STEVENS, ITHACA (JOHN H. HANRAHAN, III, OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Steuben County (Kenneth R. Fisher, J.), entered April 19, 2011 in a breach of contract action. The order, among other things, granted the cross motion of plaintiff Richard Katchuk for partial summary judgment.
It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs ( see Hughes v Nussbaumer, Clarke & Velzy , 140 AD2d 988; Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A. v Roberts & Roberts , 63 AD2d 566, 567; see also CPLR 5501 [a] [1]).

Entered: March 16, 2012 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

# Department of Defense and Mongolian Ministry of Defense Conduct Bilateral Defense Framework

U.S. Department of Defense

DoD Spokesperson Lt. Col. Martin Meiners provided the following readout:

Dr. Michael Chase, Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense (DASD) for China, Taiwan, and Mongolia, met with Brigadier General D. Gankhuyag, State Secretary of the Mongolian Ministry of Defense, today at the Pentagon for the annual Bilateral Defense Framework.

The two officials discussed regional security cooperation and global security developments, among other topics. DASD Chase also commended Mongolia's active participation in United Nations peacekeeping operations.

Both officials reaffirmed their commitment to the U.S.-Mongolia bilateral defense relationship and agreed to advance defense cooperation on shared interests to support a free and open Indo-Pacific region.

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT
# C_2006177EN.01003502.xml

| 29.7.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 177/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.7.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 177/35

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4160 — Thyssenkrupp/EADS/Atlas)

(2006/C 177/18)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 10 May 2006, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition web site (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes; |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition web site (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes;

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4160. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://ec.europa.eu/eur-lex/lex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4160. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://ec.europa.eu/eur-lex/lex)

---
-----Original Message-----

From: hans [mailto:hans@seaguiding.com]

Sent: Saturday, April 22, 2017 5:18 PM

To: FS-objections-alaska-regional-office <objections-alaska-regional-office@fs.fed.us>

Cc: Schalkowski, Jessica L -FS <jlschalkowski@fs.fed.us>

Subject: Concerns about Corporate Permit Holders

Hello Beth 

This is Hans Baertle, Registered Guide #549, owner and operator of Southeast Alaska Guiding LLC. I am 

one of the current 20 special use permit holders in unit 4. I am registered in GUA's 04-05,04-10 and GUA 

01-05 on the Southeast Mainland.

I have concerns in regard of special use permit holders within a Corporation ( INC.) for that Corporation 

being able to hang on to issued special use permits after death, medical incapability or retirement of 

their incorporated permit holder(s) and then being able to bring in a new guide for replacement so that 

Corporation can hang on to multiple GUA's to operate with. This constitutes a large advantage over 

individual permit holders who operate with 3 GUA's.

Please correct me if I'm wrong, the majority of individual licensed and permitted Guide/Outfitters are 

not able to do so with their Outfits the way I understand the decision draft. In other words I am 

able to sell my licensed and permitted Guide/Outfit to a qualified Guide if I desire to retire as long as I 

am in good standing with the authorities but I cannot as an individual permit holder pass on or will the 

permit on to a qualified registered guide who has worked for me on my side for years if I should pass 

from this world unexpected or through other unfortunate circumstances being unable to handle affairs. 

My permit would just go away whereas the Corporation gets to keep the permit and bring in a new 

guide to fill it. This is not only unfair to individual permit holders but also keeps creating conflicts in the 

field between individual Guide/Outfitters who operate with one or two clients per hunt and a larger 

Corporation with 4 clients in the field crowding and squeezing the smaller Outfits.

Either way whether being able to pass a permit on or not there should be only one standard set of rules 

applying to all licensed and permitted Guide/Outfitters and no special considerations for a Corporation 

on a case by case basis.

Thank you for allowing us to comment.

Respectfully 

Hans Baertle 

907-209-2109
#### § 226.5 Leases subject to current regulations.

Leases issued pursuant to this part shall be subject to the current regulations of the Secretary, all of which are made a part of such leases: *Provided,* That no amendment or change of such regulations made after the approval of any lease shall operate to affect the term of the lease, rate of royalty, rental, or acreage unless agreed to by both parties and approved by the Superintendent.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE>  5

<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF MARCH 31, 1999 AND CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1999
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<MULTIPLIER>  1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                  JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                    MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                              631,375
<SECURITIES>                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                       101,625
<ALLOWANCES>                        (6,097)
<INVENTORY>                               0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                    778,591
<PP&E>                               46,191
<DEPRECIATION>                        (791)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                    2,701,919
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>               266,116
<BONDS>                           1,061,221
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>               500,419
<PREFERRED>                               0
<COMMON>                                 12
<OTHER-SE>                          791,647
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>      2,701,919
<SALES>                             173,056
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                    178,183
<CGS>                                69,387
<TOTAL-COSTS>                        69,387
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                     43,050
<LOSS-PROVISION>                      1,864
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                   23,779
<INCOME-PRETAX>                      51,726
<INCOME-TAX>                         16,142
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                  35,584
<DISCONTINUED>                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<CHANGES>                          (14,710)
<NET-INCOME>                         20,874
<EPS-PRIMARY>                             0
<EPS-DILUTED>                             0
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS**

 

I, Brian E. Schaaf, certify that:

 

1.                                    I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Ford Credit Auto Lease Trust 2012-A (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);

 

2.                                    Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.                                    Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

 

4.                                    I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer and based on my knowledge and the compliance review conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and

 

5.                                    All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

 

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: The Bank of New York Mellon, as indenture trustee of the issuing entity, and U.S. Bank Trust National Association, as owner trustee of the issuing entity.

 
| Dated   March 26, 2013 |                                               |
|-----------------------------|----------------------------------------------------|
|                        |                                               |
|                        |                                               |
|                        | /s/   Brian E. Schaaf                              |
|                        | Brian   E. Schaaf                                  |
|                        | Vice   President and Assistant Treasurer           |
|                        | Ford   Motor Credit Company LLC, as Servicer       |
|                        | (senior   officer in charge of servicing function) |

 

----
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Alexander Purcell, Appellant.

[823 NYS2d 913]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Dunlop, J.), rendered July 26, 2004, convicting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree (two counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s claim that the Supreme Court erred in failing to instruct the jury that the statutory presumption under Penal Law § 265.15 (3) that the defendant possessed the firearm was rebuttable and to emphasize that the burden of proof remained on the People is without merit. The Supreme Court properly instructed the jury by expressly stating that the burden of proof remained on the People and that the presumption was merely a permissive inference which the jury had the option to reject *(see People v Waters,*30 AD3d 681 [2006]; *People v O’Neil,*196 AD2d 598 [1993]; *People v Martinez,*257 AD2d 479 [1999]). Furthermore, the defendant’s claim that the Supreme Court erred in charging the jury that it could rely upon the statutory presumption of possession of a weapon under Penal Law § 265.15 (3) to presume that the defendant had intent to use the weapon unlawfully under Penal Law § 265.15 (4) is unpreserved for appellate review *(see*CPL 470.05 [2]; *People v Saez,*238 AD2d 610 [1997]). In any event, the claim is without merit, as there was evidence, in addition to the presumption of possession, that showed that the defendant intended to use the firearm unlawfully *(see People v Donigan,*20 AD3d 487 [2005]; *see generally Tot v United States,*319 US 463, 467 [1943]; *People v Terra,*303 NY 332, 335 [1951]).

Finally, the defendant’s claim that the Supreme Court erred *849in failing to instruct the jury to consider the evidence of guilt or innocence separately as to each defendant is not preserved for appellate review (see CPL 470.05 [2]; *People v Saez,*238 AD2d 610 [1997]). In any event, the claim is without merit, as the Supreme Court properly charged the jury (see *People v Johnson,*87 NY2d 357, 360 [1996]; *People v Russell,*266 NY 147, 153 [1934]). Florio, J.P., Adams, Krausman and Rivera, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 99.6



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of
Brookfield Canada Office Properties (the “Company”) on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2014, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Bryan K. Davis, Chief Financial Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that to the best of my knowledge:



1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2. The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



| | By: | /s/ Bryan K. Davis 
Bryan K. Davis 
Chief
Financial Officer
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------





March 30, 2015





12
§ 162.563 What documents are required for BIA approval of a WSR lease? A lessee or the Indian landowners must submit the following documents to us to obtain BIA approval of a WSR lease: ( a ) A lease executed by the Indian landowners and the lessee that meets the requirements of this part;
( b ) For tribal land, a tribal authorization for the lease and, if applicable, meeting the requirements of §§ 162.549(a), 162.555(b), and 162.557(a), or a separate signed certification meeting the requirements of §§ 162.555(b) and 162.557(a));
( c ) A valuation, if required under § 162.549 or § 162.550;
( d ) Proof of insurance, if required under § 162.562;
( e ) A performance bond or other security, if required under § 162.559;
( f ) Statement from the appropriate tribal authority that the proposed use is in conformance with applicable tribal law, if required by the tribe;
( g ) Environmental and archeological reports, surveys, and site assessments as needed to facilitate compliance with applicable Federal and tribal environmental and land use requirements, including any documentation prepared under § 162.027(b);
( h ) A resource development plan that describes the type and location of any permanent improvements the lessee plans to install and a schedule showing the tentative commencement and completion dates for those improvements;
( i ) A restoration and reclamation plan (and any subsequent modifications to the plan);
( j ) Where the lessee is not an entity owned and operated by the tribe, documents that demonstrate the technical capability of the lessee or lessee's agent to construct, operate, maintain, and terminate the proposed project and the lessee's ability to successfully design, construct, or obtain the funding for a project similar to the proposed project, if appropriate;
( k ) A legal description of the land under § 162.547;
( l ) If the lease is being approved under 25 U.S.C. 415, information to assist us in our evaluation of the factors in 25 U.S.C. 415(a); and
( m ) If the lessee is a corporation, limited liability company, partnership, joint venture, or other legal entity, except a tribal entity, information such as organizational documents, certificates, filing records, and resolutions, that demonstrates that: ( 1 ) The representative has authority to execute a lease;
( 2 ) The lease will be enforceable against the lessee; and
( 3 ) The legal entity is in good standing and authorized to conduct business in the jurisdiction where the land is located.
# C_2014097EN.01001101.xml

| 2.4.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 97/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.4.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 97/11

---

Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries

2014/C 97/06

In accordance with Article 35(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), a decision has been taken to close the fishery as set down in the following table:

1

| Date and time of closure | 10.3.2014 |
| --- | --- |
| Duration | 10.3.2014 - 31.12.2014 |
| Member State | Spain |
| Stock or Group of stocks | BLI/5B67- |
| Species | Blue Ling (Molva dypterygia) |
| Zone | Union and international waters of Vb, VI and VII |
| Type(s) of fishing vessels | — |
| Reference number | 02/TQ43 |

Date and time of closure

10.3.2014

Duration

10.3.2014 - 31.12.2014

Member State

Spain

Stock or Group of stocks

BLI/5B67-

Species

Blue Ling (Molva dypterygia)

Molva dypterygia

Zone

Union and international waters of Vb, VI and VII

Type(s) of fishing vessels

—

Reference number

02/TQ43

---

(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.

1

---
#### § 101.7 Office of Science and Technology Policy.

Freedom of Information regulations for the Office of Science and Technology Policy appear at 32 CFR part 2402.

[55 FR 46037, Nov. 1, 1990]
### §12401. Army and Air National Guard of the United States: status

Members of the Army National Guard of the United States and the Air National Guard of the United States are not in active Federal service except when ordered thereto under law.

(Added Pub. L. 103–337, div. A, title XVI, §1662(f)(1), Oct. 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 2993.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

Provisions similar to those in this section were contained in sections 3495 and 8495 of this title, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 103–337, §1662(f)(2).

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Dec. 1, 1994, except as otherwise provided, see section 1691 of Pub. L. 103–337, set out as a note under section 10001 of this title.