alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 162.006 To what types of land use agreements does this part apply?

(a) This part applies to leases of Indian land entered into under 25 U.S.C. 380, 25 U.S.C. 415(a), and 25 U.S.C. 4211, and other tribe-specific statutes authorizing surface leases of Indian land with our approval.

(b) This part does not apply to:

(1) Land use agreements entered into under other statutory authority, such as the following:

| This part does not apply to . . . | which are covered by . . . |
| --- | --- |
| (i) Contracts or agreements that encumber tribal land under 25 U.S.C. 81 | 25 CFR part 84. |
| (ii) Traders' licenses | 25 CFR part 140. |
| (iii) Timber contracts | 25 CFR part 163. |
| (iv) Grazing permits | 25 CFR part 166. |
| (v) Rights-of-way | 25 CFR part 169. |
| (vi) Mineral leases, prospecting permits, or mineral development agreements | 25 CFR parts 211, 212, 213, 225, 226, 227. |
| (vii) Tribal land assignments and similar instruments authorizing uses of tribal land | tribal laws. |

(2) Leases of water rights associated with Indian land, except to the extent the use of water rights is incorporated in a lease of the land itself.

(3) The following leases, which do not require our approval, except that you must record these leases in accordance with §§ 162.343, 162.443, and 162.568:

(i) A lease of tribal land by a 25 U.S.C. 477 corporate entity under its charter to a third party for a period not to exceed 25 years; and

(ii) A lease of Indian land under a special act of Congress authorizing leasing without our approval.
#### § 166.312 Is a conservation plan required?

A conservation plan must be developed for each permit with the permittee and approved by us prior to the issuance of the permit. The conservation plan must be consistent with the tribe's agricultural resource management plan and must address the permittee's management objectives regarding animal husbandry and resource conservation. The conservation plan must cover the entire permit period and reviewed by us on an annual basis.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 373 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                     November 10, 1999.
    Resolved, That immediately following his resignation as Chaplain of the 
House of Representatives and in recognition of the length of his devoted service 
to the House, Reverend James David Ford be, and he is hereby, appointed Chaplain 
emeritus of the House of Representatives.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
|                                                                                                            |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                                                            |  |  |
|                                                                                                       |   |   |
| /s/ KATHRYN M. JOHNBULLKathryn M. JohnBull Chief Financial Officer(Principal Accounting Officer) |   |   |
§ 169.54 What are the consent requirements for service line agreements? ( a ) Before the utility provider may begin any work to construct service lines across tribal land, the utility provider and the tribe (or the legally authorized occupants or users of the tribal land and upon request, the tribe) must execute a service line agreement.
( b ) Before the utility provider may begin any work to construct service lines across individually owned land, the utility provider and the owners (or the legally authorized occupants or users) must execute a service line agreement.
# C_2013180EN.01001501.xml

| 26.6.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 180/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.6.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 180/15

---

Commission information notice pursuant to Article 17(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community

Invitation to tender in respect of the operation of scheduled air services in accordance with public service obligations

(Text with EEA relevance)

2013/C 180/08

| Member State | Italy |
| --- | --- |
| Route concerned | Alghero–Milan Linate and vice versa |
| Period of validity of the contract | A period of four years starting on 27 October 2013 |
| Deadline for submission of tenders | Two months after the publication of this notice |
| Address where the text of the invitation to tender and any relevant information and/or documentation related to the public tender and the public service obligations can be obtained | For further information, please contact:





  Regione Autonoma della Sardegna |
| Assessorato dei trasporti |
| Via XXIX Novembre 41 |
| 09123 Cagliari CA |
| ITALIA |
| Tel. +39 0706067308 |
| Fax +39 0706067338 |
| E-mail: trasp.osp@regione.sardegna.it |
| Internet: http://www.regione.sardegna.it |
| http://www.mit.gov.it |

Member State

Italy

Route concerned

Alghero–Milan Linate and vice versa

Period of validity of the contract

A period of four years starting on 27 October 2013

Deadline for submission of tenders

Two months after the publication of this notice

Address where the text of the invitation to tender and any relevant information and/or documentation related to the public tender and the public service obligations can be obtained

For further information, please contact:

Regione Autonoma della Sardegna

Assessorato dei trasporti

Via XXIX Novembre 41

09123 Cagliari CA

ITALIA

Tel. +39 0706067308

Fax +39 0706067338

E-mail: trasp.osp@regione.sardegna.it

Internet: http://www.regione.sardegna.it

http://www.mit.gov.it

---
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 29 Agreed to House (ATH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 29

 Designating minority membership on certain standing committees of the 
                                 House.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 2, 1999

Mr. Frost submitted the following resolution; which was considered and 
                               agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Designating minority membership on certain standing committees of the 
                                 House.

    Resolved, That the following named Member be, and is hereby, 
elected to the following standing committee of the House of 
Representatives:
    Committee on Veterans' Affairs: Ms. Berkley of Nevada.
                                 <all>
```
EX-34.4
(logo) Deloitte

Deloitte & Touche LLP
695 Town Center Drive
Suite 1200
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
USA

Tel: +1 714 436 7100
Fax: +1 714 436 7200
www.deloitte.com

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To Pacific Life Insurance Company:

We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying
Management's Report on Assessment of Compliance with SEC Regulation AB
Servicing Criteria, that Pacific Life Insurance Company (the "Company")
complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122 (d) of the
Securities and Exchange Commission's Regulation AB for the Securitized
Commercial Mortgage Loans Operating Advisor Platform (the "Platform"),
specifically criteria 1122(d)(3)(i)(a-c) and (d)(4)(vii), for the period
March 28, 2012 through December 31, 2012, which management has determined to be
applicable to the activities performed by the Company with respect to the
Platform. Appendix A to management's asse1tion identifies the individual asset-
backed transactions defined by management as constituting the Platform.
Management is responsible for the Company's compliance with the servicing
criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion
about the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria based on our
examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards
established by the American Institute of Ce1tified Public Accountants, as
adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and,
accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's
compliance with the applicable servicing criteria, including tests on a sample
basis of servicing activities related to the Platform, determining whether the
Company performed those selected activities in compliance with the servicing
criteria during the specified period, and performing such other procedures
as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our procedures were limited to
selected servicing activities performed by the Company during the period
covered by this report and, accordingly, such samples may not have included
servicing activities related to each specific asset-backed transaction
included in the Platform. Further, an examination is not designed to detect
noncompliance arising from errors that may have occurred prior to the period
specified above that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or
reported by the Company during the period covered by this report. We believe
that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our
examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company's compliance
with the servicing criteria.

In our opinion, management's assertion that the Company complied with the
aforementioned applicable servicing criteria for the period March 28, 2012
through December 31, 2012 for the Securitized Commercial Mortgage Loans
Operating Advisor Platform is fairly stated, in all material respects.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
February 20, 2013

Member of
Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited
### Glacial and postglacial geologic history of Isle Royale National Park, Michigan

By: N. King Huber

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/pp754A

#### Links

- More information:  **Publisher Index Page**                            (html)
-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plate:  **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

#### Study Area

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
### §20404. Selection of officers for early retirement or discharge

(a) Consideration for Early Retirement.—The Secretary of the Air Force may convene selection boards under section 20211(b) of this title to consider for early retirement officers on the space force 1 officer list as follows:

(1) Officers in the grade of lieutenant colonel who have failed of selection for promotion at least one time and whose names are not on a list of officers recommended for promotion.

(2) Officers in the grade of colonel who have served in that grade for at least two years and whose names are not on a list of officers recommended for promotion.

(3) Officers, other than those described in paragraphs (1) and (2), holding a grade below the grade of colonel—

(A) who are eligible for retirement under section 20601 of this title or who after two additional years or less of active service would be eligible for retirement under that section; and

(B) whose names are not on a list of officers recommended for promotion.

(b) Consideration for Discharge.—

(1) The Secretary of the Air Force may convene selection boards under section 20211 of this title to consider for discharge officers on the space force 1 officer list—

(A) who have served at least one year of active status in the grade currently held;

(B) whose names are not on a list of officers recommended for promotion; and

(C) who are not eligible to be retired under any provision of law (other than by reason of eligibility pursuant to section 4403 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1993) and are not within two years of becoming so eligible.

(2) An officer who is recommended for discharge by a selection board convened pursuant to the authority of paragraph (1) and whose discharge is approved by the Secretary of the Air Force shall be discharged on a date specified by the Secretary.

(3) Selection of officers for discharge under paragraph (1) shall be based on the needs of the service.

(c) Discharges and Retirements Considered to Be Involuntary.—The discharge or retirement of an officer pursuant to this section shall be considered to be involuntary for purposes of any other provision of law.

(Added Pub. L. 118–31, div. A, title XVII, §1718(a), Dec. 22, 2023, 137 Stat. 657.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Section 4403 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1993, referred to in subsec. (b)(1)(C), is section 4403 of Pub. L. 102–484, which is set out as a note under section 1293 of this title.

1 So in original. Probably should be "Space Force".
#### *In re*Elson

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS

No. 48,140

(Bar Docket No. 6866)

(544 P. 2d 1365)

ORDER canceling CERTIFICATE FILED JANUARY 23, 1976.

*Per Curiam:*

On January 22, 1976, Michael Raymond Elson voluntarily surrendered his certificate admitting him to practice law in the courts of the State of Kansas, and it is by order of the court

CONSIDERED AND ACCEPTED.

The Clerk of this Court is ordered and directed to mark the certificate void and to strike Michael Raymond Elson’s name from the roll of attorneys.
# r)

‘• "" 

### ■■

Parraguirre Hardesty would permit withdrawal of a plea after sentencing."); see also NRS 176.165 (a district court may grant a post-conviction motion to withdraw a plea in order to "correct manifest injustice"), he is not entitled to relief because "Padilla does not have retroactive effect." Chaidez v. United States, 568 U.S. „ 133 S. Ct. 1103, 1105 (2013). Therefore, we conclude that the district court did not err by denying Zamora-Del Castillo's motion, and we

ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED. 2

cc: Hon. Jerome T. Tao, District Judge Mayfield, Gruber & Sheets Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk

2 Although we filed the fast track statement submitted by ZamoraDel Castillo, it fails to comply with the Nevada Rules of Appellate Procedure because it refers to matters in the record without specific citation to the appendix. See NRAP 3C(e)(1)(C); NRAP 28(e)(1). Counsel for Zamora-Del Castillo is cautioned that the failure to comply with the briefing and appendix requirements in the future may result in the imposition of sanctions. See NRAP 3C(n).

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA
(0) 1947A 2
joint Task force-red hill (JTF-RH)

&

navy closure task force-red hill (NCTF-RH)

 TRANSITION OPEN HOUSE

February 7

4:00 - 7:00 PM

ke ehi lagoon memorial park

harry and jeannette weinberg memorial hall

▪ information booths, Videos

▪ talk with/ask questions of jtf-rh AND NCTF-RH

‘

TRANSITION CURRENTLY UNDER WAY

download the JTF-RH app

for more information

visit the NCTF-RH Website

for more information
EXHIBIT 32.1  HAMMER FIBER OPTICS HOLDINGS CORP.  Certification of the Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  In connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of Hammer Fiber Optics Holdings Corp. (the Company) for the year ended July 31, 2016 (the Report), I, Mark Stogdill, President and Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   November 30th, 2016  /s/ Mark StogdillPrincipal Executive Officer
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# USNMRTC Yokosuka Conducts, Large-scale, Multi-day, Joint-partner Exercise to Promote Interoperability and Readiness

By Gabriel Archer

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT
# C_2006190EN.01003702.xml

| 12.8.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 190/37 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.8.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 190/37

---

Action brought on 3 July 2006 — Van Neyghem v Commission

(Case F-73/06)

(2006/C 190/70)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Kris Van Neyghem (Vissenaken, Belgium) (represented by: S. Rodrigues, A. Jaume and C. Bernard-Glanz, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the director of EPSO's decision of 1 June 2005 not to admit the applicant to the oral test in competition EPSO/A/19/04; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the director of EPSO's decision of 1 June 2005 not to admit the applicant to the oral test in competition EPSO/A/19/04;

| — | Order the defendant to pay the applicant the symbolic sum of one euro, by way of compensation for his non-material damage; |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant to pay the applicant the symbolic sum of one euro, by way of compensation for his non-material damage;

| — | Order the defendant to pay the applicant an amount to be left to the Tribunal's discretion, by way of compensation for his material damage, consisting of his loss of the opportunity of being appointed to a higher grade; |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant to pay the applicant an amount to be left to the Tribunal's discretion, by way of compensation for his material damage, consisting of his loss of the opportunity of being appointed to a higher grade;

| — | Order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of his action, the applicant first claims infringement of the duty to give reasons and of the principle of equal treatment, in that neither the contested decision nor the administration's response to the applicant's complaint has enabled him to understand the mark he was awarded when the written test was marked and still less the value judgment made on his performance.

The applicant pleads, in addition, infringement of the principle of sound administration, inasmuch as the evaluation sheet for his written test is too general and imprecise and the copies of that test paper are not marked in any way.

---
* This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the

doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court

generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order

and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3. 

F I L E D

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

DEC 11 2003

PATRICK FISHER

Clerk

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

ROY WHITE,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

CITY OF FLORENCE; FLORENCE

POLICE DEPARTMENT; EUGENE

ROEDER, Mayor of the City of

Florence, in his individual and official

capacity; MIKE INGLE, Chief of

Florence Police Department, in his

individual and official capacity,

Defendants,

and

CHUCK PRATT, Sergeant, in his

individual and official capacity,

Defendant-Appellant.

No. 02-1408

(D.C. No. 01-WY-1779-AJ (MJW))

(D. Colo.)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

Before McCONNELL , ANDERSON , and BALDOCK , Circuit Judges.
-2-

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined

unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of

this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is

therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

In this interlocutory appeal, Defendant-Appellant Chuck Pratt challenges

the district court’s decision denying him summary judgment on his qualified

immunity defense. “[A]n order denying qualified immunity, to the extent it turns

on an issue of law, is immediately appealable.” Behrens v. Pelletier , 516 U.S.

299, 311 (1996) (citation, quotation omitted). In this case, however, the district

court clearly denied Pratt qualified immunity because there remained disputed

material factual issues that precluded summary judgment. It is well established

that such an order is not immediately appealable. See Johnson v. Jones , 515 U.S.

304, 313, 319-20 (1995); see also Behrens , 516 U.S. at 313. We, therefore, do

not have jurisdiction to consider this interlocutory appeal and so DISMISS it.

Entered for the Court

Bobby R. Baldock 

Circuit Judge