alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# STATEOFLOUISIANA

COURTOFAPPEAL,FIRSTCIRCUIT SEI,BY KEAN THOMPSON NO. 

### 2022 CW 0017 VERSUS ROBERT MASON THOMPSON, 

### III MARCH 16, 2022

In Re: TB 

### Services, LLC, 

### applying for 

### supervisory writs,



## Family Court 

### in and 

### for the Parish of East Baton 

### Rouge, No. 

### 226, 162.
BEFORE: GUIDRY, 

### McCLENDON, THERIOT, HOLDRIDGE, AND CHUTZ, JJ.



### WRIT DENIED. JMG PMC MRT 

### Holdridge and Chutz, JJ., 

### dissent and would grant the writ application. The 

### district court should conduct an 

### in camera 

### inspection of all 

### documents responsive to a 

## discovery request 

### directed to a 

### non-party and redact all confidential and 

### irrelevant materials prior to production to the 

### requesting 

### party.

COURT OF APPEAL, 

### FIRST CIRCUIT



### DEPUTY CERKOF COURT FOR THE COURT
Exhibit 12.1  CERTIFICATION  I, Jim Gentilcore, certify that:  1.I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Edwards Group Limited;  2.Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3.Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4.The Companys other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Company and have:  a)Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  b)Evaluated the effectiveness of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  c)Disclosed in this report any change in the Companys internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting; and  5.The Companys other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  a)All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Companys ability to record, process, summarise and report financial information; and  b)Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Companys internal control over financial reporting.  Date:   April 23, 2013By:
/s/ Jim   GentilcoreJim GentilcoreChiefExecutive Officer
The services performed by the private entity in Cherokee, for example, were an integral part of the State’s 1

transition of its public assistance function from direct financial assistance (AFDC) to incentives for training and work

(Families First).

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE

AT NASHVILLE

February 24, 2006 Session

KIMBERLY KAY ALLEN, ET AL. v. JOHN DAY, ET AL.

AND

GANNETT SATELLITE INFORMATION NETWORK, INC., D/B/A THE

TENNESSEAN, ET AL. V. POWERS MANAGEMENT, LLC

 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Davidson County

No. 02C-817 and 05C-61 Hamilton V. Gayden, Judge

No. M2005-00989-COA-R3-CV - Filed August 11, 2006

PATRICIA J. COTTRELL, J., concurring.

Because of the troubling potential for overexpansion of the “functional equivalency” rationale

established in Cherokee and relied upon herein, I write separately to identify the reason for my

concurrence. The key to determining when a private entity, through a relationship with a

government, subjects its records to public inspection lies, in the first instance, in the analysis of

whether the entity is performing a governmental function.

Certain activities have been traditionally performed by state and local governments in

fulfilment of their roles. Prime examples of such activities are law enforcement (such as policing,

incarcerating, adjudicating, etc.) and education. Many other examples exist. I do not believe that 1

managing or operating a building, be it a sports arena, entertainment venue, or other, is a traditional

governmental, as opposed to private, function. Similarly, I do not believe that the fact that a

governmental entity contracts with a private company to clean government offices makes janitorial

services a governmental function, even when performed in government-owned property.

However, in the case before us, we are faced with a State statute that makes operation of a

facility such as the Arena a governmental function, duty, or power. Tenn. Code Ann. § 7-67-102(a).

In view of that legislative action, this Court cannot substitute its own analysis of the government

function definition. 
-2-

If the definition of governmental function found in the Connecticut statute quoted in the

majority opinion, Conn. Gen. Stat. Ann. § 1-200(11), were determinative, I would be dissenting from

the majority opinion. That is because I cannot conclude that operation of a publicly-owned facility

is “the administration or management of a program.” However, in the absence of either Tennessee

legislative action or Tennessee Supreme Court holdings limiting the functional equivalent test as set

out in Cherokee, this Court is bound to follow Cherokee. Applying the language of the Supreme

Court in Cherokee, I reach the same conclusion as the majority.

____________________________________ 

PATRICIA J. COTTRELL, JUDGE
COURT OF APPEALS

SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AMARILLO

MANDATE

THE STATE OF TEXAS

To the 46th District Court of Wilbarger County, Greeting:

BEFORE our Court of Appeals for the Seventh District of Texas, on November 6, 2014,

the cause upon appeal to revise or reverse your judgment between

Oncor Electric Delivery Company LLC v. William E. Brown and Helen W. Brown as Trustees of

the William E. Brown and Helen W. Brown Revocable Living Trust

Case Number: 07-13-00428-CV Trial Court Number: 26,012

was determined and therein our said Court made its order in these words:

Pursuant to the opinion of the Court dated November 6, 2014, it is hereby ordered,

adjudged and decreed that the judgment of the trial court is reversed and remanded in part and

affirmed in part.

It is further ordered, adjudged and decreed that appellant pay one-half of the costs of

this appeal, and appellees pay one-half of the costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue.

It is further ordered that this decision be certified below for observance.

o O o

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of said Court of Appeals for

the Seventh District of Texas, in this behalf, and in all things to have it duly recognized, obeyed

and executed.

WITNESS, the Honorable Justices of our said Court, with the seal thereof annexed, at

the City of Amarillo on January 23, 2015.

Vivian Long

VIVIAN LONG, CLERK

FILE COPY
#### BROWNING-FERRIS INDUSTRIES v. LOWE’S OF GREENSBORO

No. 176P90

Case below: 97 N.C.App. 508

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 13 June 1990.
**Exhibit
      32.1**





Certification
      Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.
§1350)





I,
      Thomas
      W. Martin, Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President of ICON Capital
      Corp., the General Partner of the Registrant in connection with the Quarterly
      Report of ICON Income Fund Eight A L.P. (the "Partnership") on Form 10-Q/A
      for
      the period ended June 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
      Commission on the date hereof (the "Quarterly Report") certify, pursuant to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my
      knowledge:





1.
            The
                Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                13(a) or
                15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. §78m);
                and





2.
            The
                information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in
                all
                material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
                of
                the Partnership.








*Dated:
      December 11, 2007*





*/s/
      Thomas W. Martin*


Thomas
      W.
      Martin


Chairman,
      Chief Executive Officer and President of the General Partner


(Principal
      Executive Officer)


ICON
      Capital Corp.


General
      Partner of ICON Income Fund Eight A L.P.
H. Res. 355

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

November 4, 1999.

Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall

be in order to consider the conference report to accompany

the bill (S. 900) to enhance competition in the financial services industry by providing a prudential framework for the affiliation of banks, securities firms, insurance companies, and

other financial service providers, and for other purposes. All

points of order against the conference report and against its

consideration are waived. The conference report shall be considered as read.

Attest:

Clerk.
# **EXHIBIT 32.2**

# ** **

**CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORTS**

 

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, theundersigned officer of The Doe Run Resources Corporation (the “Company”), doeshereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge, that:

 

(a) Thequarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended January 31, 2006,of the Company as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof (the “Form 10-Q”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and;

 

(b)The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.

 

 

Date: April 28, 2006

 

 
| By:                            |  /s/ David A. Chaput |   |
|--------------------------------|---------------------------|--------|
| David A. Chaput                |
| Chief Financial Officer        |
| (Principal Financial  Officer) |

 

----
TRILATERAL STATEMENT BY THE LEGAL OFFICES OF 

AUSTRALIA JOINT OPERATIONS COMMAND, THE JAPAN JOINT STAFF, AND U.S. INDO-PACIFIC COMMAND 

Senior legal advisors from Australia, Japan, and the United States of America met at Camp Smith, Hawaii between 4-5 December 2023 to collaborate on shared 

challenges. 

In the face of significant emerging regional security challenges, we affirm our shared interest in upholding the rules-based international order and maintaining an

open and stable Inda-Pacific underpinned by the rule of law. Our greatest strength in these endeavours is our ability to collaborate with our network of allies and

partners across the region, and we recognize, in particular, the robust and deepening security relationships between ourthree countries. 

As senior military legal advisors, we play a critical role in ensuring the legality and legitimacy of the military operations and activities undertaken by our 

respective forces. As like-minded partners, we are conscious of unilateral actions inconsistent with international law that have raised tensions in the region, 

and we are committed to building legal consensus between states across the region concerning respect for sovereignty and the exercise of international law, 

rights and freedoms, while resolving differences peacefully through dialogue and in accordance with international law.

To this end, we commit to continued legal collaboration through bilateral and multilateral talks, working-level staff engagement, and information sharing. We 

will continue to develop our interoperability through bilateral and multilateral information papers that reflect our positions on significant legal issues, and 

through combined exercises which will test and enhance our ability to communicate securely, quickly and effectively with one another. Our objective is to 

work together seamlessly in the conduct of lawful military operations and activities while promoting consensus across the region in the importance of 

maintaining the rules­based international order. 

Grou aptain Christopher Taylor 

Director Legal 

Joint Operations 

Colonel Junji Shinagawa 

Legal Affairs General 

Japan Joint Staff � Captain Damian Flatt 

Staff Judge Advocate 

U.S. Inda-Pacific Command
Appendix O.2 EPA Request for Additional Information: Sea Salt
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 394 Agreed to House (ATH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 394

               Returning to the Senate the bill S. 1232.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 18, 1999

Mr. Weller submitted the following resolution; which was considered and 
                               agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
               Returning to the Senate the bill S. 1232.

    Resolved, That the bill of the Senate (S. 1232) entitled the 
``Federal Erroneous Retirement Coverage Corrections Act'', in the 
opinion of this House, contravenes the first clause of the seventh 
section of the first article of the Constitution of the United States 
and is an infringement of the privileges of this House and that such 
bill be respectfully returned to the Senate with a message 
communicating this resolution.
                                 <all>
```
§ 171.545 What can happen if I don't pay my bill on time? ( a ) We will not provide you irrigation service until: ( 1 ) Your bill is paid; or
( 2 ) You make arrangement for payment pursuant to § 171.550 of this part.
( b ) If you do not pay your bill prior to the close of business on the 30th day after the due date, we consider your bill past due, send you a notice, and assess you the following: ( 1 ) Interest, as required by 31 U.S.C. 3717. Interest will accrue from the original due date stated on your bill.
( 2 ) An administrative fee, as required by 31 CFR 901.9.
( c ) If you do not pay your bill prior to the close of business of the 90th day after the due date, we will assess you a penalty, as required by 31 CFR 901.9(d). Penalties will accrue from the original due date stated on your bill.
( d ) We will forward your past due bill to the United States Treasury no later than 180 days after the original due date, as required by 31 CFR 901.1, “Aggressive agency collection activity.”
#### § 162.023 What if an individual or entity takes possession of or uses Indian land without an approved lease or other proper authorization?

If an individual or entity takes possession of, or uses, Indian land without a lease and a lease is required, the unauthorized possession or use is a trespass. We may take action to recover possession, including eviction, on behalf of the Indian landowners and pursue any additional remedies available under applicable law. The Indian landowners may pursue any available remedies under applicable law.
Exhibit 35.1




Servicer Compliance Statement of Nissan Motor Acceptance Corporation









NISSAN MOTOR ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION




OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE




The undersigned, Mark Kaczynski, President and Chief Executive Officer of NISSAN MOTOR ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION, a California corporation (the “Company”), does hereby certify, in his capacity as such corporate officer, as follows:




(1)           The undersigned has caused a review of the activities of the Company, in its capacity as Servicer, during the 12-month period ended March 31, 2015 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance pursuant to the Sale and Servicing Agreement, dated as of February 22, 2012 (the “Agreement”), by and among the Company, individually and as servicer, Nissan Auto Receivables Corporation II, as seller, and Nissan Auto Receivables 2012-A Owner Trust, to be conducted under his supervision; and




(2)           To the best of the undersigned’s knowledge, based upon such review, the Company has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.




This Officer’s Certificate is being furnished pursuant to Item 1123 of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB for publicly-issued asset-backed securities.  Capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the meanings assigned to such terms in the Agreement.




IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have set my hand effective as of the 26th day of June, 2015.




/s/ Mark Kaczynski_________________


Mark Kaczynski


President and Chief Executive Officer
### §655. Designation of persons having interest in status of a missing member

(a) The Secretary concerned shall, upon the enlistment or appointment of a person in the armed forces, require that the person specify in writing the person or persons, if any, other than that person's primary next of kin or immediate family, to whom information on the whereabouts and status of the member shall be provided if such whereabouts and status are investigated under chapter 76 of this title. The Secretary shall periodically, and whenever the member is deployed as part of a contingency operation or in other circumstances specified by the Secretary, require that such designation be reconfirmed, or modified, by the member.

(b) The Secretary concerned shall, upon the request of a member, permit the member to revise the person or persons specified by the member under subsection (a) at any time. Any such revision shall be in writing.

(Added Pub. L. 104–106, div. A, title V, §569(d)(1), Feb. 10, 1996, 110 Stat. 352.)
### §602. Flexibility in determining terms of appointment for certain senior officer positions

The Secretary of Defense may extend or reduce the duration of an appointment made under section 152, 154, 7033, 8033, 8043, 9033, or 9082 of this title by up to six months if the Secretary determines that such an extension or reduction is necessary either in the interests of national defense, or to ensure an appropriate staggering of terms of senior military leadership.

(Added Pub. L. 118–31, div. A, title V, §504(a), Dec. 22, 2023, 137 Stat. 241.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 602, Pub. L. 96–513, title I, §105, Dec. 12, 1980, 94 Stat. 2849, related to temporary promotions of warrant officers, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 102–190, div. A, title XI, §1113(a), Dec. 5, 1991, 105 Stat. 1502.
| (logo) Rialto 

CAPITAL |  

  |
|-------------------------|----------------|

 

 

                                

 

2014 Annual Statement of Servicer Compliance (Item 1123)

 

 

                Pooling and Servicing Agreement (the “Pooling and Servicing Agreement”) dated as of  April 1, 2012 by and among Wells Fargo Commercial Mortgage Securities, Inc., as Depositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association as Master Servicer, Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC as successor Special Servicer to Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association as Certificate Administrator, as Tax Administrator and as Custodian, Pentalpha Surveillance LLC as Trust Advisor, Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as Trustee relating to the WFRBS Commercial Mortgage Trust 2012-C6, Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2012-C6  **(WFRBS 2012-C6)**

 

                

The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, as special servicer (the “Special Servicer”) herein certifies to the following:

 

1.        All servicing activities and performance of such servicing activities under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement are performed on behalf of the Special Servicer.

 

2.        A review of the servicing activities and performance by the Special Servicer for the period of January 1, 2014 to December 31, 2014 (the “Reporting Period”) in accordance with the Pooling and Servicing Agreement has been conducted under my supervision.

 

3.        To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Special Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the terms of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, in all material respects for the Reporting Period and if there has been a failure to fulfill any such obligations in any material respect, each failure and the nature and status thereof has been specifically identified herein.

 

 

 

 

Certified by:  /s/  Adam Singer                                                                                Date:  March 5, 2015

       Adam Singer, Managing Director