alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §3134. Allocation of appropriations

(a) Appropriations available for procurement by an agency named in section 3063 of this title may, through administrative allotment, be made available for obligation for procurement by any other agency in amounts authorized by the head of the allotting agency and without transfer of funds on the books of the Department of the Treasury.

(b) A disbursing official of the allotting agency may make any disbursement chargeable to an allotment under subsection (a) upon a voucher certified by an officer or civilian employee of the procuring agency.

(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 132, §2309; Pub. L. 97–258, §2(b)(1)(B), Sept. 13, 1982, 96 Stat. 1052; renumbered §3134 and amended Pub. L. 116–283, div. A, title XVIII, §1809(e), Jan. 1, 2021, 134 Stat. 4161; Pub. L. 117–81, div. A, title XVII, §1701(b)(3), Dec. 27, 2021, 135 Stat. 2132.)

| Revised section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2309(a)2309(b) | 41:159 (2d sentence).41:159 (less 1st and 2d sentences). | Feb. 19, 1948, ch. 65, §10 (less 1st sentence), 62 Stat. 25. |

2309(b)

41:159 (less 1st and 2d sentences).

In subsection (a), the words "an agency named in section 2303 of this title" are substituted for the words "any such agency".

In subsection (b), the words "an allotment under subsection (a)" are substituted for the words "such allotments".

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2021—Pub. L. 116–283, §1809(e)(1), renumbered section 2309 of this title as this section.

Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 116–283, §1809(e)(2)(A), substituted "named in section 3063" for "named in section 2303".

Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 116–283, §1809(e)(2)(B), which directed adding subsec. (c), was repealed by Pub. L. 117–81, §1701(b)(3).

1982—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 97–258 substituted "disbursing official" for "disbursing officer".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2021 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 117–81 applicable as if included in the enactment of title XVIII of Pub. L. 116–283 as enacted, see section 1701(a)(2) of Pub. L. 117–81, set out in a note preceding section 3001 of this title and note below.

Amendment by Pub. L. 116–283 effective Jan. 1, 2022, with additional provisions for delayed implementation and applicability of existing law, see section 1801(d) of Pub. L. 116–283, set out as a note preceding section 3001 of this title.
# C_2014297EN.01002301.xml

| 4.9.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 297/23 |
| -------- | -- | -------------------------------------- | -------- |

---

Corrigendum to the Notice of initiation of an anti-subsidy proceeding concerning imports of certain rainbow trout originating in Turkey

(Official Journal of the European Union C44 of 15 February 2014)

(2014/C 297/07)

On page 9, point 2. Product under investigation:

for:

‘The product subject to this investigation is rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) live, fresh, chilled, frozen or smoked whether in the form of whole fish (with heads and gills on, gutted, weighing 1,2 kg or less each), or with heads off, gilled or gutted (weighing 1 kg or less each), or in the form of fillets (weighing 400 g or less each).’

read:

‘The product subject to this investigation is rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss):

| — | live weighing 1,2 kg or less each, or |
| - | ------------------------------------- |

| — | fresh, chilled, frozen and/or smoked:
—
in the form of whole fish (with heads on), whether or not gilled, whether or not gutted, weighing 1,2 kg or less each, or —
with heads off, whether or not gilled, whether or not gutted, weighing 1 kg or less each, or —
in the form of fillets weighing 400 g or less each.’ | — | in the form of whole fish (with heads on), whether or not gilled, whether or not gutted, weighing 1,2 kg or less each, or | — | with heads off, whether or not gilled, whether or not gutted, weighing 1 kg or less each, or | — | in the form of fillets weighing 400 g or less each.’ |
| - | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | - | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | - | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | - | ---------------------------------------------------- |
| — | in the form of whole fish (with heads on), whether or not gilled, whether or not gutted, weighing 1,2 kg or less each, or | | | | | | |
| — | with heads off, whether or not gilled, whether or not gutted, weighing 1 kg or less each, or | | | | | | |
| — | in the form of fillets weighing 400 g or less each.’ | | | | | | |

---
#### Joseph D. Redding, Respondent, v. Mary Adelaide Mizner, Appellant.

Order affirmed-, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. 'Ho opinion.
# C_2013316EN.01000701.xml

| 30.10.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 316/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.10.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 316/7

---

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the TFEU

Cases where the Commission raises no objections

(Text with EEA relevance, except for products falling under Annex I to the Treaty)

2013/C 316/03

| Date of adoption of the decision | 2.10.2013 |
| --- | --- |
| Reference number of State Aid | SA.37033 (13/N) |
| Member State | Spain |
| Region | — | Mixed |
| Title (and/or name of the beneficiary) | Prórroga del régimen SA.24867 (N 10/08) «Subvenciones destinadas al fomento de sistemas de producción en regímenes extensivos» |
| Legal basis | | Real Decreto 1724/2007, de 21 de diciembre, por el que se establecen las bases reguladoras de las subvenciones destinadas al fomento de sistemas de producción de razas ganaderas autóctonas en regímenes extensivos. |

Date of adoption of the decision

2.10.2013

Reference number of State Aid

SA.37033 (13/N)

Member State

Spain

Region

—

Mixed

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

Prórroga del régimen SA.24867 (N 10/08) «Subvenciones destinadas al fomento de sistemas de producción en regímenes extensivos»

Legal basis

Real Decreto 1724/2007, de 21 de diciembre, por el que se establecen las bases reguladoras de las subvenciones destinadas al fomento de sistemas de producción de razas ganaderas autóctonas en regímenes extensivos.

| | Ley 38/2003, de 17 de noviembre, General de Subvenciones. |
| --- | --- |

Ley 38/2003, de 17 de noviembre, General de Subvenciones.

Type of measure

Scheme

—

Objective

Agri-environmental commitments

Form of aid

Direct grant

Budget

| | Overall budget: EUR 3,8 million |
| --- | --- |

Overall budget: EUR 3,8 million

| | Annual budget: EUR 3,8 million |
| --- | --- |

Annual budget: EUR 3,8 million

Intensity

100 %

Duration (period)

1.1.2014-31.12.2014

Economic sectors

Crop and animal production, hunting and related service activities

Name and address of the granting authority

| Dirección General de Procucciones y Mercados Agrarios |
| --- |
| Almagro, 33 5a planta |
| 28010 Madrid |
| ESPAÑA |

Dirección General de Procucciones y Mercados Agrarios

Almagro, 33 5a planta

a

28010 Madrid

ESPAÑA

Other information

—

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

http://ec.europa.eu/competition/elojade/isef/index.cfm

---
#### § 170.229 Can a Tribe apply for loans or credit from a State infrastructure bank?

Yes. A Tribe can apply for loans or credit from a State infrastructure bank. Upon the request of a Tribe, BIA region or FHWA will provide necessary documentation to a State infrastructure bank to facilitate obtaining loans and other forms of credit for a TTP project.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Global Crossing Limited (the registrant) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the report), I, John J. Legere, Chief Executive Officer, of the registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



(1) The report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the registrant.



Date: October 8, 2004



|                                      
|--------------------------------------
|/s/    JOHN J. LEGERE                 
|John J. Legere Chief Executive Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the Government in the Sunshine Act, Public Law 94-409, that the Securities and Exchange Commission will hold a Closed Meeting on Thursday, January 5, 2012 at 2 p.m.

Commissioners, Counsel to the Commissioners, the Secretary to the Commission, and recording secretaries will attend the Closed Meeting. Certain staff members who have an interest in the matter also may be present.

                    The General Counsel of the Commission, or his designee, has certified that, in his opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(3), (5), (7), 9(B) and (10) and 17 CFR 200.402(a)(3), (5), (7), 9(ii) and (10), permit consideration of the scheduled matters at the Closed Meeting.                          ( print page 145)    

Commissioner Walter, as duty officer, voted to consider the items listed for the Closed Meeting in closed session.

The subject matters of the Closed Meeting scheduled for Thursday, January 5, 2012 will be:

Institution and settlement of injunctive actions;

Institution and settlement of administrative proceedings;

Other matters relating to enforcement proceedings; and

Adjudicatory matters.

At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in the scheduling of meeting items.

For further information and to ascertain what, if any, matters have been added, deleted or postponed, please contact:

The Office of the Secretary at (202) 551-5400.

Dated: December 29, 2011.

Kevin M. O'Neill,

Deputy Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2011-33776 Filed 12-29-11; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News

Signal Soldiers Conduct Joint Training with ROK Army December 31, 2014 — Soldiers of the 304th Expeditionary Signal Battalion, 1st Signal Brigade and Republic of Korea Army Soldiers of the 51st Signal Communication Battalion gathered to participate in joint signal... MORE 

----

2024 (327)2023 (825)2022 (1193)2021 (1066)2020 (1083)2019 (1166)2018 (1116)2017 (1356)2016 (1475)2015 (1408)2014 (904)2013 (32)2012 (4)

About DoDDoD CareersJoin the MilitaryNewsUSA.govPhotos & VideosPrivacy & SecurityTop Issues

US INDOPACOM Inspector GeneralDoD Inspector General Accessibility/Section 508DoD FOIAUS INDOPACOM FOIALink DisclaimerNo FEAR ActRecovery ActINDOPACOM Webmaster

                  - Facebook
                  - X
                  - YouTube
                  - Instagram
                  - RSS

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
# C_2006165EN.01003501.xml

| 15.7.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 165/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.7.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 165/35

---

Action brought on 12 May 2006 — Stump and Camba Constenla v Court of Justice

(Case F-60/06)

(2006/C 165/70)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicants: Krisztina Stump and Carmen Camba Constenla (Luxembourg, Luxembourg) (represented by: S. Orlandi, A. Coolen, J.-N. Louis and E. Marchal, lawyers)

Applicants:

Defendant: Court of Justice of the European Communities

Defendant:

Form of order sought

The applicants claim that the Tribunal should:

| — | Annul the decisions appointing the applicants officials of the European Communities in so far as the decisions set their grade of recruitment in accordance with Article 12 or 13 of Annex XIII to the Staff Regulations; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decisions appointing the applicants officials of the European Communities in so far as the decisions set their grade of recruitment in accordance with Article 12 or 13 of Annex XIII to the Staff Regulations;

| — | Order the Court of Justice to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Court of Justice to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of their action, the applicants rely upon pleas in law very similar to those put forward in Case F-12/06 (1).

1

---

(1)  OJ C 86, 8.4.2006, p. 48.

1

---
§ 601.2 Policies. Consistent with 40 CFR 1500.1 and 1500.2, it shall be the policy of the NCPC to: ( a ) Comply with the procedures and policies of NEPA and other related laws, regulations, and orders applicable to Commission actions.
( b ) Provide applicants sufficient guidance to ensure plans and projects comply with the rules of this part and other laws, regulations, and orders applicable to Commission actions.
( c ) Integrate NEPA into its decision-making process at the earliest possible stage.
( d ) Integrate the requirements of NEPA and other planning and environmental reviews required by law including, without limitation, the National Historic Preservation Act, 54 U.S.C. 306108 (NHPA), to ensure all such procedures run concurrently.
( e ) Use the NEPA process to identify and assess the reasonable alternatives to proposed actions that will avoid or minimize adverse effects on the quality of the human environment in the National Capital Region.
( f ) Use all practicable means to protect, restore, and enhance the quality of the human environment including the built and socioeconomic environments and historic properties within the National Capital Region.
( g ) Streamline the NEPA process and Environmental Impact Statements (EIS) to the maximum extent possible.
( h ) Use the NEPA process to assure orderly and effective NCPC decision-making and to foster meaningful public involvement in NCPC's decisions.
§ 171.405 Can I build my own structure or take over responsibility of a BIA structure? You may build a structure on our irrigation facility for your private use or take responsibility of one of our structures, but only under a written agreement between you and us which: ( a ) Relieves us from any future liability or responsibility for the structure;
( b ) Relieves us from any future costs incurred for maintaining the structure;
( c ) Describes what is granted by us and accepted by you; and
( d ) Provides that if you do not regularly use a structure for a period of time that we have determined, or you do not properly maintain and rehabilitate the structure, we will notify you in writing that: ( 1 ) You must either remove it or correct any unsafe condition;
( 2 ) If you do not comply with our notice, we may remove the structure and you must reimburse us our costs; and
( 3 ) We may modify, close, or remove your structure without notice due to an urgency we have identified.
§ 169.402 Who may investigate compliance with a right-of-way? ( a ) BIA may investigate compliance with a right-of-way. ( 1 ) If an Indian landowner notifies us that a specific abandonment, non-use, or violation has occurred, we will promptly initiate an appropriate investigation.
( 2 ) We may enter the Indian land subject to a right-of-way at any reasonable time, upon reasonable notice, and consistent with any notice requirements under applicable tribal law and applicable grant documents, to protect the interests of the Indian landowners and to determine if the grantee is in compliance with the requirements of the right-of-way.
( b ) The tribe with jurisdiction may investigate compliance consistent with tribal law.
#### § 2.206 What must I include in my Notice of Appeal?

In addition to meeting the requirements of § 2.214, your Notice of Appeal must include an explanation of how you satisfy the requirements of standing set out in § 2.200 and a copy of the decision being appealed, if possible.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# USS Rafael Peralta Conducts Jeju, Republic of Korea Port Visit

By Lt. Cmdr. Joe Keiley, Commander,Task Force 71 Public Affairs

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More
#### § 20.515 What is required for case management?

Social services workers must document regular contact with children and families in accordance with specific program requirements. The social services agency is responsible for implementation of quality case management; this requires the supervisor's review of case plans every 90 days.
#### § 170.910 What information on the TTP or projects must BIA or FHWA provide?

All available public information regarding the TTP can be found on the BIA transportation Web site at *http://www.bia.gov/WhoWeAre/BIA/OIS/Transportation/index.htm* or the Federal Lands Highway—Tribal Transportation Program Web site at *http://flh.fhwa.dot.gov/programs/ttp/*. If a Tribe would like additional information that is not available on the Web sites, the Tribe should contact FHWA or BIA directly. FHWA and BIA will then provide direction or assistance based upon the Tribe's specific request.
Exhibit 35.3



















ANNUAL STATEMENT AS TO COMPLIANCE



The undersigned, David Co, a Director of Deutsche Bank Trust Company
Americas, as the Certificate Administrator (a “Certifying Servicer”) under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, dated
as of December 1, 2011 (the “Agreement”), by and among, Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Securities Inc., as Depositor,
Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer, Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association,
as Special Servicer, Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as Trustee, Certificate Administrator, Paying Agent and Custodian, and
Trimont Real Estate Advisors, Inc., as Operating Advisor here by certifies in accordance with Section 10.11 of the Agreement:



| | A) | A review of such Certifying Servicer’s activities from the Closing Date to the end of such calendar year and of such
Certifying Servicer’s performance under the Agreement has been made under such officer’s supervision and
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | B) | That, as to the best of his knowledge, based on such review, such Certifying Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under
the Agreement, in all material respects from the Closing Date to the end of such calendar year.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



DEUTSCHE BANK TRUST COMPANY AMERICAS

as Certificate Administrator



/s/ David Co

_________________________________

BY: David Co

Title: Director

Date: March 10, 2012
§ 162.514 May permanent improvements be made under a WEEL? ( a ) A WEEL anticipates the installation of facilities and associated infrastructure of a size and magnitude necessary for evaluation of wind resource capacity and potential effects of development. These facilities and associated infrastructure are considered permanent improvements. An equipment installation plan must be submitted with the lease under § 162.528(g).
( b ) If any of the following changes are made to the equipment installation plan, the Indian landowners must approve the revised plan and the lessee must provide a copy of the revised plan to BIA: ( 1 ) Location of permanent improvements;
( 2 ) Type of permanent improvements; or
( 3 ) Delay of 90 days or more in any phase of development.