alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV

House Calendar No. 217

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 488

[Report No. 106–605]

Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with respect to

consideration of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on Rules.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 3, 2000

Mr. REYNOLDS, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

RESOLUTION

Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with

respect to consideration of certain resolutions reported

from the Committee on Rules.

1 Resolved, That the requirement of clause 6(a) of rule

2 XIII for a two-thirds vote to consider a report from the

3 Committee on Rules on the same day it is presented to

4 the House is waived with respect to any resolution re5 ported on the legislative day of May 4, 2000, providing

6 for consideration or disposition of a conference report to

7 accompany the bill (H.R. 434) to authorize a new trade
2

HRES 488 RH

1 and investment policy for sub-Sahara Africa, or any

2 amendment reported in disagreement from a conference

3 thereon.

House Calendar No. 217

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 488

[Report No. 106–605]

RESOLUTION

Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII

with respect to consideration of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on Rules.

MAY 3, 2000

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be

printed
IV

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 378

Recognizing the vital importance of hunting as a legitimate tool of wildlife

resource management.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

NOVEMBER 16, 1999

Mr. GREEN of Wisconsin submitted the following resolution; which was

referred to the Committee on Resources

RESOLUTION

Recognizing the vital importance of hunting as a legitimate

tool of wildlife resource management.

Whereas past predatory animal populations served to check

the population of nonpredatory species;

Whereas through habitat reduction and other means, humans

have played a role in the decline in the population of

predatory animals;

Whereas nonpredatory species experience prolonged starvation and devastating disease due to overpopulation;

Whereas hunting helps balance the population of nonpredatory species;

Whereas hunters have a strong commitment to the overall

health of wildlife and to the broader public’s enjoyment

of our natural resources;
2

•HRES 378 IH

Whereas hunters have contributed a majority of the financial

resources for wildlife preservation through Federal and

State revenues generated from hunting licenses and

stamps;

Whereas these revenues are used to create and preserve habitat for game, non-game, and endangered animal species;

and

Whereas these revenues are also used to regulate and effectively protect the populations of these animals: Now,

therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives—

2 (1) recognizes hunting as a legitimate and nec3 essary tool of wildlife resource management;

4 (2) affirms the vital importance of lawful hunt5 ing, regulated by the various State departments in

6 charge of natural resources and the United States

7 Department of the Interior, in maintaining healthy

8 populations of wildlife;

9 (3) declares, as a matter of principle, that no

10 Federal law should be passed limiting the taking and

11 consumptive use of wildlife, other than those reason12 able laws to ensure the safety of hunters and the

13 continued perpetuation of wildlife itself; and

14 (4) acknowledges exceptions to paragraph (3),

15 including laws designed to—

16 (A) protect species that are in danger of

17 extinction;
3

•HRES 378 IH

1 (B) protect species which are not tradition2 ally considered as game or suitable for con3 sumptive use; and

4 (C) ensure hunting is carried out in a

5 sportsmanlike manner.

Æ
§ 1000.13 What is a “nonsignatory Tribe”? ( a ) A nonsignatory Tribe is a Tribe that either: ( 1 ) Does not meet the eligibility criteria in § 1000.16 and, by resolution of its governing body, authorizes a Consortium to participate in self-governance on its behalf.
( 2 ) Meets the eligibility criteria in § 1000.16 but chooses to be a member of a Consortium and have a representative of the Consortium sign the compact and AFA on its behalf.
( b ) A non-signatory tribe under paragraph (a)(1) of this section: ( 1 ) May not sign the compact and AFA. A representative of the Consortium must sign both documents on behalf of the Tribe.
( 2 ) May only become a “signatory Tribe” if it independently meets the eligibility criteria in § 1000.16.
VERIFICATION CERTIFICATE 

NOT TRANSFERABLE 

This Verification Certificate is hereby issued to the named GRANTEE and is VALID ONLY for 

the equipment identified hereon for use under the rules and regulations listed below: 

GRANTEE: AirSep Corporation 

Address: 401 Creekside Drive, 

 Buffalo, New York 

USA, 14228 

Contact Person: Mr. Mike Chimiak 

Phone #: 716-691-0202 x243 

Fax #: 716-564-3736 

Email Address: mike. chimiak@airsep.com 

Equipment Type: Category M - Airborne Equipment 

Product: Focus Unit ,(Model: AS078, P/N: AS078-1-2-3-4) with 

a. Battery Pack (14.8Vdc Li-Ion) 

(Model: BTO23-1; S/N: G3000230: P/N:BT023-1) 

b. AirBelt Battery (Ultralife 14.6Vdc Li-Ion) 

(Model: BT017-X; S/N: F5116013; P/N:BT017-1-2-3-4) 

c. AirBelt Battery (International Components Corporation 14.8Vdc 

Li-Ion) (Model: BT017-X; P/N:BT017-1-2-3-4) 

d. Elpac Power Systems AC/DC Power Supply 

(Model: 4249; P/N:PW019-1)

The above product was 

tested by UltraTech 

Engineering Labs Inc. and 

found to comply with: 

Radio Technical Commission for Aeronautics, RTCA/DO-160F, 

Section 21: Emission and Radio Frequency Energy

Note(s): See report, UltraTech's File No.: AIR100-RTCA-DO160F, dated March 4, 2011 for details and conditions of Verification 

Compliance. 

Approved by: Tri M. Luu, BASc., 

V.P. – Engineering 

UltraTech 

3000 Bristol Circle, Oakville, Ontario, Canada, L6H 6G4 

Tel.: (905) 829-1570 Fax.: (905) 829-8050 

www.ultratech-labs.com Email: vic@ultratech-labs.com, Email: tri@ultratech-labs.com

FCC

Korea KCC-RRL 

91038 1309 46390-2049 NVLAP Lab Code 200093-0 SL2-IN-E-1119R CA2049
### §9282. Medals: posthumous award and presentation

(a) If a person dies before the award of a medal of honor, distinguished-service cross, distinguished-service medal, distinguished flying cross, or device in place thereof, to which he is entitled, the award may be made and the medal or device presented to his representative, as designated by the President.

(b) If a person dies before an authorized service medal or device prescribed as a part thereof is presented to him under section 9281 of this title, it shall be presented to his family.

(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 542, §8752; Pub. L. 85–861, §33(a)(23), Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1565; renumbered §9282 and amended Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, §§806(b)(11), 809(a), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1833, 1840.)

| Revised section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 8752(a)   8752(b) | 10:1409 (words between 1st and 2d semicolons).10:1429 (1st 49 words of last sentence).10:1415a (21st through 30th words, less applicability to clauses (a) through (n)). | July 9, 1918, ch. 143 (words between 1st and 2d semicolons of 15th par. under "Ordnance Department"), 40 Stat. 871.July 2, 1926, ch. 721, §12 (1st 49 words of last sentence), 44 Stat. 789; July 30, 1937, ch. 545, §4, 50 Stat. 549. |
| | | May 12, 1928, ch. 528, §1 (25th through 34th words, less applicability to clauses (a) through (n)), 45 Stat. 500. |

8752(b)

10:1429 (1st 49 words of last sentence).

10:1415a (21st through 30th words, less applicability to clauses (a) through (n)).

July 2, 1926, ch. 721, §12 (1st 49 words of last sentence), 44 Stat. 789; July 30, 1937, ch. 545, §4, 50 Stat. 549.

In subsection (a), the words "If a person" are substituted for the words "In case an individual * * * dies", in 10:1409, and "In case an individual * * * shall have died", in 10:1429. The words "within three years from the date", in 10:1409, are omitted as covered by section 8744 of this title. The words "who shall distinguish himself", in 10:1409, and "who distinguishes himself", in 10:1429, are omitted as covered by the words "the award * * * to which he is entitled".

#### 1958 Act

The change reflects the fact that the source statute for these sections (sec. 1 of the Act of May 12, 1928, ch. 528, 45 Stat. 500) was mandatory and not merely permissive.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–232, §806(b)(11), renumbered section 8752 of this title as this section.

Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 115–232, §809(a), substituted "section 9281" for "section 8751".

1958—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 85–861 substituted "it shall be presented" for "it may be presented".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2018 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 115–232 effective Feb. 1, 2019, with provision for the coordination of amendments and special rule for certain redesignations, see section 800 of Pub. L. 115–232, set out as a note preceding section 3001 of this title.

#### Effective Date of 1958 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 85–861 effective Aug. 10, 1956, see section 33(g) of Pub. L. 85–861, set out as a note under section 101 of this title.
§ 166.501 How are annual administrative fees determined? ( a ) Except as provided in subsection (b), we will charge a three percent (%) administrative fee based on the annual grazing rent.
( b ) The minimum administrative fee is $10.00 and the maximum administrative fee is $500.00.
( c ) If a tribe performs all or part of the administrative duties for this part, the tribe may establish, collect, and use reasonable fees to cover its costs associated with the performance of administrative duties.
### §7714. Collection of captured flags, standards, and colors

The Secretary of the Army shall have sent to him all flags, standards, and colors taken by the Army from enemies of the United States.

(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 266, §4714; renumbered §7714, Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, §808(d), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1839.)

| Revised section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 4714 | 5:198. | R.S. 218. |

The words "from time to time", "collected", and "at the seat of government" are omitted as surplusage.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–232 renumbered section 4714 of this title as this section.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2018 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 115–232 effective Feb. 1, 2019, with provision for the coordination of amendments and special rule for certain redesignations, see section 800 of Pub. L. 115–232, set out as a note preceding section 3001 of this title.
# C_2006178EN.01004501.xml

| 29.7.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 178/45 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.7.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 178/45

---

(2006/C 178/82)

Last publication of the Court of Justice in the Official Journal of the European Union

Official Journal of the European Union

OJ C 165, 15.7.2006.

OJ C 165, 15.7.2006.

Past publications

OJ C 154, 1.7.2006.

OJ C 143, 17.6.2006.

OJ C 131, 3.6.2006.

OJ C 121, 20.5.2006.

OJ C 108, 6.5.2006.

OJ C 96, 22.4.2006.

These texts are available on:

| | EUR-Lex:http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex |
| --- | --- |

EUR-Lex:http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex

| | CELEX:http://europa.eu.int/celex |
| --- | --- |

CELEX:http://europa.eu.int/celex

---
#### § 153.5 Children of competent Indians.

Children of competent Indians who have attained or upon attaining their majority shall automatically become competent except any such Indian who is declared incompetent by a court of competent jurisdiction or who is incompetent under the laws of the State within which he resides.
Mayor 

Billy Shoemaker 

City Clerkfl'reasurer 

JoAnn Armstead 

May 7, 2012 

Mr. Dennis DeVany 

Chief, Essential Air Service Division 

Office of Aviation Analysis 

Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

Reference; DOT-OST-2008-0209, 2001-10685, 2009-0305, 2000-7856 

Council Members 

Randall B. Davis 

George E. Johnson, Sr. 

Martha Smith 

Richard Coates 

Robert Mitchell 

EAS>Muscle Shoals, AL. Greenville, MS, Laurel/Hattiesburg, MS and Tupelo, 

Dear Mr. Devaney, 

As the Mayor of the City .ofTuscumbia, Alabama, it is my desire to lend support to the proposal of Silver 

Airways to provide essential air service at Muscle Sholas, Alabama as replacement for current Delta Air 

Lines service. 

Local air service that provides an effective connection to the national and international air 

transportation system is critical to the economic well being of Northwest Alabama and to the City of 

Tuscumbia, Alabama. We in Tuscumbia rely on our local air service for both business and leisure travel. 

The Silver Airways proposals offer us a modern 34-seat turboprop aircraft and flights to Atlanta, which is 

not only the largest hub airport in the world but also a popular business and leisure travel destination 

from Tuscumbia to Atlanta. 

I believe the Silver air service proposals represent the best option for retaining our local air service long 

term and building up traffic so that government subsidies can eventually be reduced or eliminated. 

I respectfully urge the Department of Transportation to award Silver Airways the designation to provide 

essentials air service, for all of Northwest Alabama/ 

Best Regards, 

!Pz5~ Billy 5. ~oemaker, Mayor 

City of Tuscumbia, Alabama 

9k .t:kfnd,Y @p -· .<:&"«4dore q/".':77dr/l Sfd'k·E 

) ()) F. :~ <;t S i1<th Sr r~P t
Need to return call by / at/between and

. Signatur e:

___________________________ Project No.: 0172.09.029.0 4 1 DISTRIBUTION

Page _ 1 _ of

__ 1

_

Project Name: Steam Electric Rulemaking

TELEPHONE CALL RECORD

Outgoing Call Date: 10/13/2011 Time: 10:30 AM

Company Name: Louisville Gas & Electric Co (Trimble County

Power Plant) Contact Name: Mike Winkler

Phone No.: 502

- 627

- 2338

Name: TJ Finseth , Eastern Research Group

GENERAL SUBJECT : Trimble County’s FGMC System



### TOPICS DISCUSSED AND ACTION TAKEN

I called Mr. Winkler with Lo uisville Gas & Electric on October 13, 2011 to discuss the flue gas mercury control

(FGMC) system at Trimble County for Unit 2. Mr. Winkler confirmed that Trimble County Unit 2 began

operation in October 2010

. H owever, he stated that it was planned to begi n operation in Jan/Feb 2010, but they

had issues with the operation of the boiler and had to do some reconfigurations. Mr. Winkler confirmed that

Unit 2 operates with a dry ESP for fly ash collection (which has both wet and dry handling capabilities),

foll owed by activated carbon injection for mercury removal, and the mercury

- impregnated carbon is collected

in a fabric filter baghouse. The plant has both wet and dry handling capabilities for the carbon from the

baghouse; however, all the carbon is currently wet sluiced to the zero discharge ash treatment basin because the

plant is still going through the construction and permitting for the landfill. Mr. Winkler stated that the landfill is

expected to be ready to received combustion residuals in 2013 or 2014 at the earliest.

Mr. Winkler stated that most of the fly ash (from the dry ESP) for Units 1 and 2 is handled dry because they are

able to sell the fly ash to a concrete manufacturer. The plant recently signed a contract with a concrete

manufacturer. The p lant is unable to sell the mercury

- impregnated carbon; therefore, this waste will need to be

disposed of in the landfill.

Mr. Winkler stated that the plant had planned to use the overflow from the zero discharge ash treatment basin as

make

- up water to the FGD system, and that the FGD system would transfer its wastewater to the gypsum

storage pond (which is still under construction) and the overflow from the gypsum storage pond would be

discharged. However, based on EPA and permit writer comments, the plant revised its plans and now uses river

water as the source of make

- up water for the FGD. The overflow from the zero discharges ash treatment basin is

only recycled for use as fly and bottom ash sluice water.

At the time of the call, the gypsum storage pond was still under construction; therefore, the plant is sending the

FGD wastewater to the zero discharge ash treatment basin instead of the gypsum storage pond.
Editorial Note on Part 224
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 224 appear at 84 FR 69611, Dec. 18, 2019.

§ 224.182 What is the Initial Appeal Process? The initial appeal process is as follows: ( a ) Within 30 days of receiving an adverse decision by the Director or similar level official within 30 days after the time period within which the Secretary is required to act under subpart E, a party that may appeal under this subpart may file an appeal to the Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary—Indian Affairs;
( b ) Within 60 days of receiving an appeal, the Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary—Indian Affairs will review the record and issue a written decision on the appeal; and
( c ) Within 7 days of a decision by the Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary—Indian Affairs, the Secretary will provide a written copy of the decision to the Tribe and other participating parties.
[73 FR 12821, Mar. 10, 2008, as amended at 84 FR 69614, Dec. 18, 2019]
#### Peggy Hudson OGILVIE, Admx. Petitioner, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent. Hillsman TAYLOR, Petitioner, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent.

Nos. 12111-12112.

United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit.

Oct. 20, 1954.

P. K. Seidman, Memphis, Tenn., for petitioner.

H. Brian Holland, Daniel A. Taylor, John M. Morawski, Ellis N. Slack, and Dudley J. Godfrey, Jr., John J. Kelley, Jr., Washington, D. C., for respondent.

Before ALLEN, McALLISTER and MILLER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

This cause was heard upon the record, briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties;

And the Court being of the opinion that the receipt by the petitioners in May 1945 of $21,150 in cash from the judgment debtor Cole “in full settlement” of the $75,702.12 judgment against him, which petitioners had purchased in June 1943 from the judgment creditor for $11,004, was not a “sale or exchange of a capital asset” within the meaning of Section 117(a) (4), Internal Revenue Code, 26 U.S.C.A.; United States v. Bur*749rows Bros. Co., 6 Cir., 133 F.2d 772; Wenger v. Commissioner, 42 B.T.A. 225, 232, affirmed 6 Cir., 127 F.2d 523, certiorari denied 317 U.S. 646, 63 S.Ct. 40, 87 L.Ed. 520; Hale v. Helvering, 66 App.D.C. 242, 85 F.2d 819 ; Fairbanks v. United States, 306 U.S. 436, 59 S.Ct. 607, 83 L.Ed. 855; Helvering v. William Flaccus Oak Leather Co., 313 U.S. 247, 61 S.Ct. 878, 85 L.Ed. 1310.

And that the Tax Court was not in error in treating the transaction as one resulting in ordinary income to the taxpayer and not constituting a long-term capital gain. Hudson v. C. I. R., 20 T.C. 734; compare: Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Starr Bros., 2 Cir., 204 F.2d 673; Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. McCue Bros. & Drummond, Inc., 2 Cir., 210 F.2d 752.

It is ordered that the judgment of the Tax Court be affirmed.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.1

                          CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
                                 SECTION 302 OF
                         THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Eric J. Pulaski, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of BindView Development
Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

      (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

      (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

      (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

      (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

      (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: May 14, 2004

/s/ ERIC J. PULASKI
-------------------------------
Eric J. Pulaski
Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive
Officer and President