alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 252

Expressing the condolences of the House on the death of the Honorable

George E. Brown, Jr.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 16, 1999

Mr. FARR submitted the following resolution; which was considered and agreed

to

RESOLUTION

Expressing the condolences of the House on the death of

the Honorable George E. Brown, Jr.

Resolved, That the House has heard with profound sorrow of the death of the Honorable George E. Brown, Jr., a

Representative from the State of California.

Resolved, That a committee of such Members of the

House as the Speaker may designate, together with such

Members of the Senate as may be joined, be appointed to attend the funeral.

Resolved, That the Sergeant at Arms of the House be

authorized and directed to take such steps as may be necessary for carrying out the provisions of these resolutions and
2

HRES 252 ATH

that the necessary expenses in connection therewith be paid

out of the contingent fund of the House.

Resolved, That the Clerk communicate these resolutions

to the Senate and transmit a copy thereof to the family of

the deceased.

Resolved, That when the House adjourns today, it adjourn as a further mark of respect to the memory of the deceased.

Æ
### Geology of the Apollo 14 landing site in the Fra Mauro highlands

By: G.A. SwannN. G. BaileyR. M. BatsonR. E. EggletonM. H. HaitH. E. HoltK.B. LarsonV. S. ReedG. G. SchaberR. L. SuttonN.J. TraskG. E. UlrichH. G. Wilshire

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/pp880

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 3**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 4**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 5**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 6**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 7**                            (pdf) 
- Superseded Publications:
                                        Documentation of the Apollo 14 samples(1971)                                    

                                        Apollo 14 traverse map(1971)                                    

                                        Preliminary geologic investigations of the Apollo 14 landing site(1971)                                    

- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

Dec ember 13 , 2019 

# Order

Clerk Dec ember 13 , 2019

160357 ( 77 )

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

SC: 160357

v COA: 339986

K alkaska CC: 16

- 003913

- FC

RODGER ANTHONY NESTO

, JR

. , Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of Julie Baumer to file a brief amicus

curiae is GRANTED. The amicus brief submitted on Dec ember 11 , 2019, is accepted for

filing

.
### §2204. Obligation of appropriations

To prevent overdrafts and deficiencies in the fiscal year for which appropriations are made, appropriations made to the Department of Defense or to a military department, and reimbursements thereto, are available for obligation and expenditure only under scheduled rates of obligation, or changes thereto, that have been approved by the Secretary of Defense. This section does not prohibit the Department of Defense from incurring a deficiency that it has been authorized by law to incur.

(Added Pub. L. 87–651, title II, §207(a), Sept. 7, 1962, 76 Stat. 520.)

| Revised section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2204 | 5:172c. | July 26, 1947, ch. 343, §404; added Aug. 10, 1949, ch. 412, §11 (7th par.), 63 Stat. 587. |

The words "on and after the beginning of the next fiscal year following August 10, 1949," are omitted as executed. The last sentence is substituted for the proviso in 5 U.S.C. 172c.
#### § 213.5 Term of oil and gas leases.

Oil and gas mining leases which require the approval of the Secretary of the Interior may be made for periods of 10 years from the date of approval of lease by the Secretary of the Interior and as much longer thereafter as oil and/or gas is produced in paying quantities.
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

No. 21

- 20499

**Matthew James Leachman,**

Petitioner

— Appellant **,**

versus

**Sheriff Ed Gonzalez,**

Respondent

— Appellee

**.**

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:19

- CV

- 2943

Before **Elrod, Oldham,** and **Wilson,** Circuit Judges

**. Per Curiam**  **:** *
Matthew James Leachman , Texas prisoner # 01525039 , moves for a certificate of appealability (COA) to appeal the dismissal, on exhaustion and abstention grounds, of his pretrial 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition . Leachman’s § 2241 petition challenged his pending retrial for aggravated sexual assault of a child on the basis of prosecutorial vindictiveness, double jeopardy, and a

* Pursuant to **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED May 11, 2022
Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 21-20499 Document: 00516315999 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/11/2022No. 21

- 20499

2 violation of his right to a speedy trial. He additionally appeals the district court’s implicit denial of his motion to expand the record.
As an initial matter, by failing to request a COA on the issue of double jeopardy, Leachman has abandoned that claim. See Matchett v. Dretke , 380 F.3d 844, 848 (5th Cir. 2004)

. To obtain a COA on his remaining claims, including his challenge to the denial of the motion to expand the record,
Leachman must make “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right,” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2 ) , by showing “at least, that jurists of reason
would find it debatable wheth er the petition states a valid claim of the denial of a constitutional right and that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the district court was correct in its procedural ruling , ” Slack v.
McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000) . Leachman fails t o make the requisite showing, and the motion for a COA is accordingly **DENIED**

. To the extent a COA is not required to appeal the denial of the motion to expand the record , we conclude that the district court did not abuse its
discretion in denying the motio n

. See In re Liljeberg Enters., Inc ., 304 F.3d 410, 433 n.43 (5th Cir. 2002)

. The documents that Leachman s ought to expand the record to include would not alter the district court’s finding that
he failed to exhaust his state court remedies before seekin g federal habeas
relief. See generally Montano v. Texas , 867 F.3d 540, 542 (5th Cir. 2017). Accordingly, we alternatively **AFFIRM** the denial of the motion to expand
the record

. Case: 21-20499 Document: 00516315999 Page: 2 Date Filed: 05/11/2022
#### § 1187.51 Will OIED facilitate relationships between awardees and educational institutions serving Native American communities?

OIED will facilitate the relationships between awardees and educational institutions serving Native American communities, including Tribal colleges and universities.
§ 273.131 What is required for a Tribal request for a contract? ( a ) An Indian Tribal governing body that desires that a contract be entered into with a Tribal organization must notify the BIE Director no later than February 1 preceding the school year for the contract.
( b ) If the BIE Director does not receive the Tribal governing body's notice by the date in paragraph (a) of this section, the BIE Director may contract with the State, public school district, or Indian corporation under this part.
( c ) The Tribal governing body has the option to contract with the State, public school district, or Indian corporation.
#### In the Matter of Deborah Kopald et al., Appellants, v Supervisor and Town Board of the Town of Highlands et al., Respondents.

[823 NYS2d 901]

In a proceeding, inter alia, pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent Village Board of the Village of Highland Falls, dated July 12, 2004, and an undated determination of the respondent Town of Highlands, which, after a joint hearing, granted the application of the nonparty United States of America to annex certain territory from the Town of Highlands to the Village of Highland Falls, the petitioners appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Orange County (Owen, J.), entered June 16, 2005, which denied their petition, confirmed the determinations, and dismissed the proceeding on the ground of lack of standing.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with one bill of costs.

The Supreme Court properly dismissed the petition for lack of standing. The petitioners, who are residents and taxpayers of the Village of Highland Falls and the Town of Highlands, failed to establish that they are adversely affected by the annexation determinations or the review conducted pursuant to the State Environmental Quality Review Act (ECL art 8 [SEQRA]) *(see Society of Plastics Indus. v County of Suffolk,*77 NY2d 761, 774 [1991]; *Matter of Mobil Oil Corp. v Syracuse Indus. Dev. Agency,*76 NY2d 428, 433 [1990]; *Matter of Sun-Brite Car Wash v Board of Zoning & Appeals of Town of N. Hempstead,*69 NY2d 406, 413 [1987]; *Matter of Dairylea Coop. v Walkley,*38 NY2d 6, 11 [1975]; *Matter of McCartney v Dormitory Auth. of State of N.Y.,*5 AD3d 1090 [2004]; *Matter of Save Our Main St. Bldgs, v Greene County Legislature,*293 AD2d 907 [2002]; *Giardino v Gardinier,*124 AD2d 1020 [1986]). Miller, J.P., Ritter, Spolzino and Dillon, JJ., concur.
#### § 11.418 Misbranding.

A person who shall knowingly and willfully misbrand or alter any brand or mark on any livestock of another person, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor.
§ 143.1 Definitions. As used in this part: ( a ) *Assistant Secretary* means the Assistant Secretary—Indian Affairs, Department of the Interior, or other employee to whom authority has been delegated.
( b ) *Reservation* means any bounded geographical area established or created by treaty, statute, executive order, or interpreted by court decision and over which a federally recognized Indian Tribal entity may exercise certain jurisdiction.
( c ) *Flat fee* is the amount prorated to each user based on the total costs incurred by the Government for the goods/services being provided.
( d ) *Non-Federal users* are persons not employed by the Federal Government who receive goods/services provided by the BIA.
( e ) *Goods/Services* for the purpose of these regulations are those provided or performed at the request of an indentifiable recipient and are above and beyond those which accrue to the public at large.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# On USS Carl Vinson, Carter Highlights Asia-Pacific Rebalance 

By Lisa FerdinandoDoD News, Defense Media Activity

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

Carter Discusses Asia-Pacific Rebalance 

More New/Articles
#### § 171.410 Can I install a fence on a BIA irrigation project?

Yes. Fences are considered structures and may be installed in compliance with § 171.405.
# C_2013289EN.01001101.xml

| 4.10.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 289/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.10.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 289/11

---

Notice of the impending expiry of certain countervailing measures

2013/C 289/06

1.   As provided for in Article 18(4) of Council Regulation (EC) No 597/2009 of 11 June 2009 on protection against subsidised imports from countries not members of the European Community (1), the European Commission gives notice that, unless a review is initiated in accordance with the following procedure, the countervailing measures mentioned below will expire on the date mentioned in the table below.

1

2.   Procedure

Procedure

Union producers may lodge a written request for a review. This request must contain sufficient evidence that the expiry of the measures would be likely to result in a continuation or recurrence of subsidisation and injury.

Should the Commission decide to review the measures concerned, importers, exporters, representatives of the exporting country and Union producers will then be provided with the opportunity to amplify, rebut or comment on the matters set out in the review request.

3.   Time limit

Time limit

Union producers may submit a written request for a review on the above basis, to reach the European Commission, Directorate-General for Trade (Unit H-1), N-105 8/20, 1049 Brussels, Belgium (2) at any time from the date of the publication of the present notice but no later than three months before the date mentioned in the table below.

2

4.   This notice is published in accordance with Article 18(4) of Regulation (EC) No 597/2009.

| Product | Country(ies) of origin or exportation | Measures | Reference | Date of expiry (3) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Biodiesel | United States of America | Countervailing duty | Council Regulation (EC) No 598/2009 (OJ L 179, 10.7.2009, p. 1) as extended to certain blends originating in the United States of America and as extended to imports consigned from Canada by Council Regulation (EU) No 443/2011 (OJ L 122, 11.5.2011, p. 1) | 11.7.2014 |

Product

Country(ies) of origin or exportation

Measures

Reference

Date of expiry (3)

3

Biodiesel

United States of America

Countervailing duty

Council Regulation (EC) No 598/2009 (OJ L 179, 10.7.2009, p. 1) as extended to certain blends originating in the United States of America and as extended to imports consigned from Canada by Council Regulation (EU) No 443/2011 (OJ L 122, 11.5.2011, p. 1)

11.7.2014

---

(1)  OJ L 188, 18.7.2009, p. 93.

1

(2)  Fax +32 22956505.

2

(3)  The measure expires at midnight of the day mentioned in this column.

3

---
#### State of Nebraska, appellee, v. Douglas Lee Temple, appellant.

236 N. W. 2d 835

Filed December 24, 1975.

No. 40169.

*92Fisher & Fisher, for appellant.

Paul L. Douglas, Attorney General, and Harold Mosher, for appellee.

Heard before White, C. J., Spencer, Boslaugh, McCown, Newton, Clinton, and Brodkey, JJ. ■

Boslaugh, J.

The defendant was convicted of assault and battery and sentenced to 20 days imprisonment in the county jail. The judgment was affirmed by this court in State v. Temple, 193 Neb. 89, 225 N. W. 2d 422.

On March 26, 1975, after the mandate had been received and filed in the District Court, the defendant filed an application for work release. The application was denied but the sentence was suspended and the defendant’s bond continued. The defendant has appealed and contends the trial court erred in refusing to grant his application for work release.

The work release law, which was enacted in 1969, provides that any person sentenced to a city or county jail may be granted the privilege of leaving the jail during necessary and reasonable hours for certain specified purposes. § 47-401, R. R. S. 1943. Working at his employment or conducting his own business or other self-employed occupation are among the authorized purposes set out in the statute. Petitions for work release should be filed in the sentencing court. § 47-402, R. R. S. 1943.

The defendant’s application alleged the defendant had approximately 1,400 to 1,500 cows and calves in South Dakota, at a location approximately 80 miles from Rush-*93ville, Nebraska, and that it was necessary for the defendant to be present during the day to look after the cattle and conduct his business. The defendant requested that he be allowed to serve his sentence in the Pennington County jail in Rapid City, South Dakota, and be allowed to leave the jail at 6 o’clock a.m. and return at 8 o’clock p.m. on each day of the sentence. The law provides the sentencing court may arrange for a sentence to be served in a different county. § 47-407, R. R. S. 1943.

Apparently, no showing was made in support of the application, other than the application itself. There is nothing in the record to show why the application was refused other than some indication that the trial court did not believe there would be any particular hardship on the defendant or his family if the application was denied.

Work release is a privilege that may be granted by the sentencing court. It is not a right which must be granted to all prisoners. We think the statute gives the sentencing court a broad discretion in ruling on petitions for work release, and a denial of the privilege should not be subject to review except where there has been a clear abuse of discretion. The record here fails to show a clear abuse of discretion.

The order of the District Court is affirmed.

Affirmed.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

# Solomon Islands Celebrates Completion of School Renovations with Seabees

By Sgt. James GulliverUSMC, Pacific Partnership Public Affairs

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More News/Articles
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Graham Packaging Holdings Company on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31,
2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Mark S. Burgess, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Graham Packaging Holdings
Company.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: May 7, 2010



|    |  |                        
|--- |  | -----------------------
|By: |  | /s/ Mark S. Burgess    
|    |  | Mark S. Burgess        
|    |  | Chief Executive Officer

The foregoing
certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure
document.
§ 15.204 When is a probate file complete? A probate file is complete for transfer to OHA when a BIA approving official includes a certification that: ( a ) States that the probate file includes all information listed in § 15.202 that is available; and
( b ) Lists all sources of information BIA queried in an attempt to locate information listed in § 15.202 that is not available.