alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Michael Downey, Appellant.

[824 NYS2d 287]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Carol Berkman, J.), entered on or about June 8, 2005, which adjudicated defendant a level three sex offender pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (SORA) (Correction Law art 6-C), unanimously affirmed, without costs.

*343In 1993, defendant was convicted of unlawful imprisonment in the first degree, committed against a four-year-old victim. The order on appeal adjudicated him a sex offender pursuant to Correction Law § 168-a (2) (a) (i), which includes within the category of “sex offenses” certain abduction-related crimes committed against children by persons other than their parents. Defendant argues that the statute is unconstitutional as applied to him, because his crime allegedly lacked any sexual aspect or motive, so that requiring him to register as a sex offender does not serve the interests underlying SORA. We conclude that the statute is, at the very least, constitutional as applied to defendant, and we decline to reach any other constitutional issues. The underlying unlawful imprisonment case clearly had a sexual aspect. Defendant approached a child he did not know, forcibly seized the child from her mother, and kissed the child. There is no other reasonable explanation for defendant’s conduct other than a sexual motive. In addition, defendant has two prior convictions for sex crimes.

The record supports the hearing court’s finding that defendant should be designated a level three sex offender. The various mitigating factors argued by defendant are outweighed by the danger of future recidivism and do not warrant a downward departure from defendant’s presumptive risk level *(see People v Guaman,*8 AD3d 545 [2004]). Concur—Tom, J.E, Andrias, Saxe, Gonzalez and Sweeny, JJ.
#### § 166.800 What is trespass?

Under this part, trespass is any unauthorized occupancy, use of, or action on Indian agricultural lands. These provisions also apply to Indian agricultural land managed under an agricultural lease or permit under part 162 of this title.
### §7151. Commissioned officer grades

The commissioned grades in the Regular Army are:

(1) Major general.

(2) Brigadier general.

(3) Colonel.

(4) Lieutenant colonel.

(5) Major.

(6) Captain.

(7) First lieutenant.

(8) Second lieutenant.

(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 181, §3281; renumbered §7151, Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, §808(b)(3), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1838.)

| Revised section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 3281 | 10:506(a) (last 24 words). | Aug. 7, 1947, ch. 512, §502(a) (last 24 words), 61 Stat. 884. |

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–232 renumbered section 3281 of this title as this section.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2018 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 115–232 effective Feb. 1, 2019, with provision for the coordination of amendments and special rule for certain redesignations, see section 800 of Pub. L. 115–232, set out as a note preceding section 3001 of this title.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on January 18, 2011, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), Halon Alternatives Research Corporation, Inc. (“HARC”) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, Gielle di Luigi Galantucci, Altarnura, ITALY; Global Safety Labs, Tulsa, OK; Minimax USA, Inc., Mesa, AZ; N2 Towers, Belleville, Ontario, CANADA; and Orr Protection Systems, Louisville, KY, have been added as parties to this venture. Also, Aerojet, Rocket Research Company, Redmond, WA; Chemetron Fire Systems, Matteson, IL; Chemtura Corporation, Middlebury, CT; and Fireline Corporation, Baltimore, MD, have withdrawn as parties to this venture.                

No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned activity of the group research project. Membership in this group research project remains open, and HARC intends to file additional written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.

                    On February 7, 1990, HARC filed its original notification pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on March 7, 1990 (55 FR 8204).                

                    The last notification was filed with the Department on March 8, 2006. A notice was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on May 10, 2006 (71 FR 27278)                

Patricia A. Brink,

Director of Civil Enforcement, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 2011-3853 Filed 2-18-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
P. 1


# OAR Box 1802 Prepped by Charmelle Mathews



### Document

Number: 

# 50 ) IV-E-4 5 Docket Number: 

# A-90-3 7

Printed 11/4/200811:57:59 AM

Sheet 50 of 117P. 2 

# Iff-E-4 5 U S EVIRONMENTA

L PROTECTION AGENC Y Office o f Air Quaht y Plannin g an

d Standard s Researc h Triangl e Park , Nort h Carolin a2771 1
Date : Februar

y 22,200 0 To : Ai r an d Radiatio n Docke

t #A-90- 3 7 From : Denni s Crumpler , Integrate d Implementatio n Group , ITPID , MD-1 2 Re : Meeting wit

h Clas s o f 8 5 Representative s O n Septembe

r 27,1999 , th e EP

A met wit h representative s o f

agrou p o f utilitie s calle d th e Clas s o f

85(attende e hs t

i s attached)
. Th e discussio n focuse d o n th e mor

e genera l ne w sourc e review (NSR

) applicabilit

y provision s fo

r utihtie s bein g considere d i n NS R Refor mrulemaking
. The Clas s o f

8 5 woul d advocat

e voluntar y participatio n i n acap-and-trade-kin d o f systema s a

n off-ram p t o conventiona

l NS R applicability
. The

y als o propose d asystemtha t woul d no t requir e company-wid

e participation
. They ha

d les s concer

n wit h lowe r overal l emissio n target s and a shorte r tim e to reac h complianc e tha

n othe r utilit y groups , i f

their suggeste d attribute s coul d b e incorporate d i n th e program . cc : Pa mSmith , (MD-12 ) Jo n Devine , OG

C Attendees : Bil l Bumpers , Bake

r & Botts , LL

P Debr aJezouit , Bake

r & Botts , LL

P Bill Harnett , OAQP S Carol Holmes , OECA Denni s Crumpler , OAQP S Mik e Sewell , OAQP S Karen Blanchard , OAQP S Bruc e Buckheit , OECA ClaraPoffenberger , Bake

r & Botts , LL

P Ann aWood , OPA

R Jo n Devine , OG

C Gre g Foote , OG

C EP A Offic e Abbreviations : OAQPS

- Office o f Ai r Qualit y Plannin g an

d Standards ; OGC-

- Offic e of Genera l Counsel ; OECA-Offic e o f Enforcemen

t an d Complianc e Assurance ; an d OPAR-Offic e o f

Polic y Analysi s an

d Regulations
. 

# 1
#### Lewis J. Morrison v. Edward L. Andrews and Another.

Motion denied.
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 35 (Tuesday, February 22, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 9787]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-3823]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention


NIOSH Dose Reconstruction Program Ten Year Review--Phase I Report 
on Quality of Science; Request for Public Review and Comment

AGENCY: National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), 
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Department of Health and 
Human Services.

ACTION: Request for public comment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: NIOSH requests public review and comment on the draft 
publication, ``NIOSH Dose Reconstruction Program Ten Year Review--Phase 
I Report on Quality of Science.'' This publication is part of a review 
by NIOSH of its program in support of the role of the Secretary of 
Health and Human Services under the Energy Employees Occupational 
Illness Compensation Program Act of 2000 (The Act). As stated in NIOSH 
Docket <greek-i>194, Phase I of the review is a data-driven assessment 
of the dose reconstruction program. The information provided in Phase I 
will be used by NIOSH in considering recommendations for improving the 
program during Phase II of the review.
    This publication is the Phase I report on one of the five topics 
under consideration during the program review: The quality of science 
practiced by NIOSH in the program. The document can be found at http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/docket/archive/docket194.html.

ADDRESSES: Written comments may be submitted to the NIOSH Docket 
Office, Robert A. Taft Laboratories, 4676 Columbia Parkway, MS-C34, 
Cincinnati, Ohio 45226. All material submitted should reference docket 
number NIOSH-194 and must be submitted by April 25, 2011 to be 
considered by the Agency. All electronic comments should be formatted 
in Microsoft Word. In addition, comments may be sent via e-mail to 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#85ebeceaf6ede1eae6eee0f1c5e6e1e6abe2eaf3"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="4a24232539222e2529212f3e0a292e29642d253c">[email protected]</span></a> or by facsimile to 513-533-8285. A complete 
electronic docket containing all comments submitted will be available 
on the NIOSH Web page at http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/docket, and comments 
will be available in writing by request. NIOSH includes all comments 
received without change in the electronic docket, including any 
personal information.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert Daniels, NIOSH, 4676 Columbia 
Parkway, Mailstop R-13, Cincinnati, OH 45226, 513-458-7178.

John Howard,
Director, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health.
[FR Doc. 2011-3823 Filed 2-18-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-19-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### STATE v. STRICKLAND

No. 53P90

Case below: 96 N.C.App. 642

Petition by defendant for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 5 April 1990.
`[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 143 Reported in House (RH)]






                                                  House Calendar No. 40
106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 143

                          [Report No. 106-102]

Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the 
   bill (H.R. 800) to provide for education flexibility partnerships.


_______________________________________________________________________


                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 20, 1999

Ms. Pryce of Ohio, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION


 
Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the 
   bill (H.R. 800) to provide for education flexibility partnerhips.

    Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in 
order to consider the conference report to accompany the bill (H.R. 
800) to provide for education flexibility partnerships. All points of 
order against the conference report and against its consideration are 
waived. The conference report shall be considered as read.




                                                  House Calendar No. 40

106th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                              H. RES. 143

                          [Report No. 106-102]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the 
   bill (H.R. 800) to provide for education flexibility partnerhips.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             April 20, 1999

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed`
MEMORANDUM

TO: File
FROM: Cecilia M. Martaus

RE: Demonstration of AT&T ’s U

- v erse® TV Service

DATE: March 21 , 2012 This memorandum summarizes a meeting held with Department of Energy officials at AT&T’s offices on March 20, 2012 to provide a demonstration of AT&T’s U

- v erse® TV Service. This is provided i n compliance with the Department of Energy’s guidance on ex parte communications (74 Fed. Reg. 52,795 (Oct. 14, 2009))

. Meeting attendees:
DOE: Dan Cohen (GC); Celia Sher (GC); Jeremy D ommu (EE)
AT&T: Mary McCarthy; Jeff Dyg ert; Cecilia Martaus Sidley Austin: Alan Raul AT&T representatives gave a high

- level overview of the U

- verse® network and demonstrated , at the AT&T Innovation Center , the basic functionalities of the TV product. In the context of this dem o, there
was a brief, passing discussion of the energy usage of the receivers and RG equipment generally relating to stand

- by and active mode and operation between those two modes.
#### § 170.105 When must State governments consult with Tribes?

As identified in 23 U.S.C. 134 and 135, States will develop their STIP in consultation with Tribes in the area where the project is located. This includes providing for a process that coordinates transportation planning efforts carried out by the State with similar efforts carried out by Tribes. Regulations governing STIPs can be found at 23 CFR part 450.
#### § 124.1 What is the purpose of this part?

This part provides contact information on depositing proceeds from contracts, leases, permits, rights-of-way, or easements pertaining to lands withdrawn for Native selection under the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act. All Federal agencies and the State of Alaska must use this part when making deposits of this type.
### §14506. Effect of failure of selection for promotion: reserve majors of the Army, Air Force, and Marine Corps and reserve lieutenant commanders of the Navy

Unless retained as provided in section 12646, 12686, 14701, or 14702 of this title, each reserve officer of the Army, Navy, Air Force, or Marine Corps who holds the grade of major or lieutenant commander who has failed of selection to the next higher grade for the second time and whose name is not on a list of officers recommended for promotion to the next higher grade shall, if not earlier removed from the reserve active-status list, be removed from that list in accordance with section 14513 of this title on the later of (1) the first day of the month after the month in which the officer completes 20 years of commissioned service, or (2) the first day of the seventh month after the month in which the President approves the report of the board which considered the officer for the second time.

(Added Pub. L. 103–337, div. A, title XVI, §1611, Oct. 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 2951; amended Pub. L. 104–106, div. A, title XV, §1501(b)(29), Feb. 10, 1996, 110 Stat. 498; Pub. L. 106–65, div. A, title V, §514(a), Oct. 5, 1999, 113 Stat. 593.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1999—Pub. L. 106–65 inserted "the later of (1)" after "in accordance with section 14513 of this title on" and ", or (2) the first day of the seventh month after the month in which the President approves the report of the board which considered the officer for the second time" before the period at end.

1996—Pub. L. 104–106 inserted comma after "Force" in section catchline.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1999 Amendment

Pub. L. 106–65, div. A, title V, §514(b), Oct. 5, 1999, 113 Stat. 593, provided that: "The amendments made by subsection (a) [amending this section] shall apply with respect to removals of reserve officers from reserve active-status lists under section 14506 of title 10, United States Code, on or after the date of the enactment of this Act [Oct. 5, 1999]."

#### Effective Date of 1996 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 104–106 effective as if included in the Reserve Officer Personnel Management Act, title XVI of Pub. L. 103–337, as enacted on Oct. 5, 1994, see section 1501(f)(3) of Pub. L. 104–106, set out as a note under section 113 of this title.

#### Effective Date

Section effective Oct. 1, 1996, see section 1691(b)(1) of Pub. L. 103–337, set out as a note under section 10001 of this title.
# Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed April 28, 2021. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________ No. 3D20-1035 Lower Tribunal No. 19-2418

________________ 

### O.R.S., a Juvenile , Appellant, vs. 

### The State of Florida , Appellee. An appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Dawn Denaro, Judge. Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender, and Howard K. Blumberg, Special Assistant Public Defender, and Rachel E. Bolshin and Carla V. Llaneza, Certified Legal Interns, for appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Christina L. Dominguez, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee. Before SCALES, MILLER, and LOBREE, JJ. PER CURIAM.2

Affirmed.
`[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 282 Reported in House (RH)]






                                                 House Calendar No. 105
106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 282

                          [Report No. 106-310]

Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the 
   bill (H.R. 2587) making appropriations for the government of the 
  District of Columbia and other activities chargeable in whole or in 
   part against revenues of said District for the fiscal year ending 
              September 30, 2000, and for other purposes.


_______________________________________________________________________


                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 8, 1999

    Mr. Linder, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION


 
Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the 
   bill (H.R. 2587) making appropriations for the government of the 
  District of Columbia and other activities chargeable in whole or in 
   part against revenues of said District for the fiscal year ending 
              September 30, 2000, and for other purposes.

    Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in 
order to consider the conference report to accompany the bill (H.R. 
2587) making appropriations for the government of the District of 
Columbia and other activities chargeable in whole or in part against 
revenues of said District for the fiscal year ending September 30, 
2000, and for other purposes. All points of order against the 
conference report and against its consideration are waived. The 
conference report shall be considered as read.
                                     





                                                 House Calendar No. 105

106th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                              H. RES. 282

                          [Report No. 106-310]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the 
   bill (H.R. 2587) making appropriations for the government of the 
  District of Columbia and other activities chargeable in whole or in 
   part against revenues of said District for the fiscal year ending 
              September 30, 2000, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                           September 8, 1999

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed`
445 12th Street SW 

Washington, DC 20024-2101 PBGC Pension Benefit 202-229-4040 

"'" Guaranty Corporation PBGC.gov 

FISCAL YEAR 2023 QUARTER Q2 FOIA REPORT 

January 1, 2023-March 31, 2023 

Number of Requests Number ofRequests Number of Requests 

Received Processed Backlogged 

928 769 0
### §7779. Use of public property

(a) When the economy of the Army so requires, the Secretary of the Army shall establish military headquarters in places where suitable buildings are owned by the United States.

(b) No money appropriated for the support of the Army may be spent for post gardens or Army exchanges. However, this does not prevent Army exchanges from using public buildings or public transportation that, in the opinion of the office or officer designated by the Secretary, are not needed for other purposes.

(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 270, §4779; Pub. L. 99–661, div. B, title VII, §2721, Nov. 14, 1986, 100 Stat. 4042; renumbered §7779, Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, §808(d), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1839.)

| Revised section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 4779(a)4779(b) | 10:1332.10:1345. | June 23, 1879, ch. 35, §8, 21 Stat. 35. |
| 4779(c) | 10:1335. | Aug. 1, 1914, ch. 223 (2d par. under "Quartermaster Corps"), 38 Stat. 629. |
| | | July 16, 1892, ch. 195 (last proviso under "Quartermaster's Department"), 27 Stat. 178; June 28, 1950, ch. 383, §402(c), 64 Stat. 227. |

4779(b)

10:1345.

In subsection (a), the words "United States" are substituted for the word "Government".

In subsection (b), the words "suitable space" are substituted for the words "proper and suitable room or rooms". The words "there is a" are substituted for the words "have been established".

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–232 renumbered section 4779 of this title as this section.

1986—Subsecs. (b), (c). Pub. L. 99–661 redesignated subsec. (c) as (b) and struck out former subsec. (b) which directed the Secretary to assign suitable space for postal purposes at each military post where there was a post office.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2018 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 115–232 effective Feb. 1, 2019, with provision for the coordination of amendments and special rule for certain redesignations, see section 800 of Pub. L. 115–232, set out as a note preceding section 3001 of this title.