T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). N E D / R es ear ch NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON

UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T J E R R Y R OY WAL E AN , P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 07- 71232 A ge nc yN o. A 095- 629- 838 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

a n O r de rof

the B o ar do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d D e c e m be r15, 2009 ** B efo re: G O O D W IN , W A L L A C E , an dC L IF T O N , C i rcu i tJu d g es. J e rryR oyW a l e an, ana t i ve a nd c i t i z e n of I ndone s i a , pe t i t i ons f

orr e vi e w of the B oard of Im m i grat i on A pp ea l s’ order di sm i ss i ng hi s app ea l fr om an i m m i gr a t i on j udge ’ s de c i s i on de ny i ng hi s appl i c a t i on f ora s y l um a nd w i thhol di ng



# FI LED DE C 28 2009 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALSN ED / Res ea r ch 07- 71232 2 of r e m ova l . W e ha ve j ur i s di c t i on unde r8 U . S . C . § 1252. W e r e vi e w f or s ub s tan tia l e v id e n c e f

in d in g s o f

f a c t, H o x h a v . A s h c r o

ft , 3 1 9 F .3 d1 1 7 9 , 1 1 8 2 n .4 ( 9 th C i r . 2 0 0 3 ) , a n dwe d e n yth e p e t i t i o n f o rr e v i e w. T he re cord do es no tcom pel the concl usi on thatW al ean h as show n chang ed c ir c u m s tan c e s to e x c u s e th e u n tim e lyf ilin g o f h is a s y lu m ap p lic a tio n . See 8 U .S .C . § 1 1 5 8 ( a ) ( 2 ) ( D ) ; 8 C .F .R . § 1 2 0 8 .4 ( a ) ( 4 ) ; se e al so R am adan v. G on zales , 47 9 F . 3d 64 6, 65 7-58 (9th C i r. 20 07 ) ( per c uri am ). T h e r e c o r dd o e s n o t c o m p e l th e c o n c lu s io n th a t th e r e is ac le arp r o b ab ility W al ean w ou l d b e per se cut ed on ac coun tof hi s w es t erni zat i on or U ni t ed S t at es c itiz e n c h ild r e n if

h e r e tu rn e dto I n d o n e s ia . Se e R am adan , 47 9 F . 3d at65 8. E ven i f the di s f a vor e d gr oup ana l y s i s s e tf orth i n Sa e l v . A s h c r o

ft , 386 F . 3d 922, 927- 29 ( 9th C i r . 2004) appl i e s t o W a l e an, aS e ve nth D ayA dve nt i s tC hr i s t i an, he ha s not d e m o n s tr a te dth e r e q u is ite in d iv idu a liz e dr is ko f p e r s e c u tio n . Se e H

ox ha , 319 F .3 da t 1 1 8 4 - 8 5 ; se e al

so W akkaryv. H

older , 5 5 8 F .3 d1 0 4 9 , 1 0 6 6 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 9 ) . (“ an appl i cantfor w i thh ol di ng of re m ov alw i l l need t o add uce aconsi derabl y l ar ger q u an tu m o f i n d i v i du al i zed -ri skev i d en ce t o p rev ai l [. ] ”). F i n al l y, th e reco rdal so doe s notc om pe l the c onc l us i on tha tthe r e i s apatt e rn orpr a c t i c e of pe r s e c ut i on of C h r is tian s in I n d o n e s ia . See W a kka ry , 5 5 8 F .3 da t 1 0 6 0 - 6 2 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 9 ) .N ED / Res ea r ch 07- 71232 3 A cco rd i n g l y, W al ean ’ s w i th h o l d i n g o f rem o v al cl ai m fai l s. P E T I T I ON F OR RE V I E W DE NI E D.