alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
JTF-RH Integrated Master Schedule (IMS) EXSUM

Plans

Repairs /

Maint.

Response

Training

QA

OPS

DOH/EPA

DOD Approvals

Milestones

Deliverables/Actions

Planning

Execution

Regulator Review

NEPA

JTF-RH is working to achieve a CONDITIONS BASED defueling start of Oct 2023

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED CAO: 05 1055W JUN 23

#

3: Initial Prep for Defueling

4: Final Prep for Defueling

5: Defuel and Relocate Fuel

2024

Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan

2023

3 4 5

DOD Defuel 

Approval 

Defuel

Start

Dewater

Training 

Certification

Dewater

QA/Safety 

Validation

DOD 

Repacking Approval 

DOD

Dewatering Approval 

EA 

Kickoff

Draft 

Final EA

NEPA 

Complete 

30-day Public 

Comment period

DOD Repairs 

Complete

3rd Party Quality Validation

3rd Party Quality Validation Complete

Defuel Supplement 2 Draft

Repacking 

Unforeseen

Repairs/Maintenance Defuel

Start

Tank

Tightness 

Testing 

Repacking

Spill Drill

Dewatering 

Procedure 

Review/ 

Response Drill

Defueling

Procedure 

Review// 

Response Drill

Unpacking

Complete

Unpacking

Complete

Unpacking

Complete

Unpacking

Complete

Defuel

Start

Repacking

Procedure Review/ 

Response Drill

Defueling

Spill / Fire 

Response Drill

DOD Tank Bottom 

Approval 

DOD Unpacking 

Approval 

Tank 

Bottom

Start

Unpacking

Start

Unpacking 

Procedure Review/ 

Response Drill

Dewatering Repacking 

Dewatering 

Approval

Repacking 

Approval

Main Tanks Defuel 

Approval

Tank Bottom 

Defuel Approval

Unpacking 

Approval

Defuel 

Preparedness 

Approval

Repair 

Approval

Defuel 

Supplement 2 

Approval

Dewatering 

Repacking

Training 

Certification

Repacking

QA/Safety 

Validation

Defuel

Training 

Certification

Defuel

QA/Safety 

Validation

Unpacking

Training 

Certification

Unpacking

QA/Safety 

Validation

Repairs Approved

Repair QA Audits

JTF Repair Quality Assurance Audits Complete

Dewatering 

Procedure 

Review/ 

Response Drill

Dewatering 

Repacking

Procedure Review/ 

Response Drill

Repacking 

Defueling

Procedure 

Review// 

Response Drill

Defuel

Start

Tank 

Bottom

Start

Unpacking

Start

Tank Bottom

Procedure Review/ 

Response Drill

Tank Bottom

Training 

Certification

Tank Bottom

QA/Safety 

Validation

Tank Bottom

Procedure Review/ 

Response Drill

Unpacking 

Procedure Review/ 

Response Drill

Surge Tank 

Approval

Surge Tank

Procedure 

Review/ 

Response Drill

Surge Tank

Procedure 

Review/ 

Response Drill

Decision Point

Tankers / October Start
### §8226. Fatality reviews

(a) Review of Fatalities.—The Secretary of the Navy shall conduct a multidisciplinary, impartial review (referred to as a "fatality review") in the case of each fatality known or suspected to have resulted from domestic violence or child abuse against any of the following.

(1) A member of the naval service on active duty.

(2) A current or former dependent of a member of the naval service on active duty.

(3) A current or former intimate partner who has a child in common or has shared a common domicile with a member of the naval service on active duty.

(b) Matters To Be Included.—The report of a fatality review under subsection (a) shall, at a minimum, include the following:

(1) An executive summary.

(2) Data setting forth victim demographics, injuries, autopsy findings, homicide or suicide methods, weapons, police information, assailant demographics, and household and family information.

(3) Legal disposition.

(4) System intervention and failures, if any, within the Department of Defense.

(5) A discussion of significant findings.

(6) Recommendations for systemic changes, if any, within the Department of the Navy and the Department of Defense.

(c) OSD Guidance.—The Secretary of Defense shall prescribe guidance, which shall be uniform for the military departments, for the conduct of reviews by the Secretary under subsection (a).

(Added Pub. L. 108–136, div. A, title V, §576(b)(1), Nov. 24, 2003, 117 Stat. 1487, §6036; renumbered §8226, Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, §807(b)(7), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1834.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 8230, added Pub. L. 85–861, §1(164)(B), Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1515, provided that members of Air Force who are detailed for any duty with agencies of United States outside the Department of Defense on a reimbursable basis not be counted in computing strengths under any law, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 96–513, title II, §232, Dec. 12, 1980, 94 Stat. 2886, effective Sept. 15, 1981.

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–232 renumbered section 6036 of this title as this section.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2018 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 115–232 effective Feb. 1, 2019, with provision for the coordination of amendments and special rule for certain redesignations, see section 800 of Pub. L. 115–232, set out as a note preceding section 3001 of this title.

#### Effective Date

Section applicable to fatalities that occur on or after Nov. 24, 2003, see section 576(d) of Pub. L. 108–136, set out as a note under section 7381 of this title.
# C_2013299EN.01000201.xml

| 15.10.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 299/2 |
| ---------- | -- | -------------------------------------- | ------- |

---

Winding-up proceedings

Decision to open winding-up proceedings in respect of apdrošināšanas akciju sabiedrību (AAS) ‘BALVA’

(Publication made in accordance with Article 14 of Directive 2001/17/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the reorganisation and winding-up of insurance undertakings)

2013/C 299/02

| Insurance undertaking | The insolvent AAS (apdrošināšanas akciju sabiedrība) Balva
E. Birznieka-Upīša iela 12 Rīga, LV-1050 LATVIJA E-mail: balva@balva.lv | E. Birznieka-Upīša iela 12 | Rīga, LV-1050 | LATVIJA | E-mail: balva@balva.lv |
| ------------------------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------------------------------------- | -------------------------- | ------------- | ---------------------- |
| E. Birznieka-Upīša iela 12 | | | | | |
| Rīga, LV-1050 | | | | | |
| LATVIJA | | | | | |
| E-mail: balva@balva.lv | | | | | |
| Date, entry into force and nature of the decision | On 22 July 2013 an extraordinary general meeting of the shareholders of AAS Balva passed a decision on the winding-up of AAS Balva.
On 12 August 2013, the Latvian Register of Enterprises passed Decision No 6-12/112/489/1 on making an entry in the commercial register regarding the winding-up proceedings through which AAS Balva was recognised as insolvent. | | | | |
| Competent authorities | Financial and Capital Market Commission Kungu iela 1 Rīga, LV-1050 LATVIJA E-mail: FKTK@FKTK.LV | Financial and Capital Market Commission | Kungu iela 1 | Rīga, LV-1050 | LATVIJA |
| Financial and Capital Market Commission | | | | | |
| Kungu iela 1 | | | | | |
| Rīga, LV-1050 | | | | | |
| LATVIJA | | | | | |
| E-mail: FKTK@FKTK.LV | | | | | |
| Supervisory authority | Financial and Capital Market Commission Kungu iela 1 Rīga, LV-1050 LATVIJA E-mail: FKTK@FKTK.LV | Financial and Capital Market Commission | Kungu iela 1 | Rīga, LV-1050 | LATVIJA |
| Financial and Capital Market Commission | | | | | |
| Kungu iela 1 | | | | | |
| Rīga, LV-1050 | | | | | |
| LATVIJA | | | | | |
| E-mail: FKTK@FKTK.LV | | | | | |
| Liquidator appointed | Mr Rolands Strazdiņš E. Birznieka-Upīša iela 12 Rīga, LV-1050 LATVIJA | Mr Rolands Strazdiņš | E. Birznieka-Upīša iela 12 | Rīga, LV-1050 | LATVIJA |
| Mr Rolands Strazdiņš | | | | | |
| E. Birznieka-Upīša iela 12 | | | | | |
| Rīga, LV-1050 | | | | | |
| LATVIJA | | | | | |
| Applicable law | The Law on insurance companies and the supervision thereof
The Commercial Law | | | | |

---
§ 168.2 Authority. It is within the general authority of the Secretary to protect Indian trust lands against waste and to prescribe rules and regulations under which these lands may be leased or permitted for grazing. Also, under the Navajo-Hopi Settlement Act as amended, 25 U.S.C. 640d-8 and 18, the Secretary is authorized and directed to: ( a ) Reduce livestock grazing within the former Joint Use Area to carrying capacity,
( b ) Restore the grazing range potential of the resource to maximum grazing extent feasible,
( c ) Survey, monument and fence the partition boundary,
( d ) Protect the rights and property of individuals awaiting relocation or authorized to reside on life estates, and
( e ) To administer conservation practices, including grazing control and range restoration activities on the Hopi Partitioned Lands.
# C_2014117EN.01009201.xml

| 16.4.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 117/92 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.4.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 117/92

---

Decisions in the context of the monitoring of the implementation of decisions regarding restructuring and liquidation aid for financial institutions

(Text with EEA relevance)

2014/C 117/03

| Date of adoption of the decision | 11.12.2013 |
| --- | --- |
| Reference number of the aid | SA.29832 (2013/N-3) |
| Member State | Netherlands |
| Title (and/or name of the beneficiary) | ING — IABF Termination |
| Type of Decision | New decision related to the following Commission decision: SA.27991 (C10/09) |
| Content | Termination of IABF contains no additional aid |
| Other information | |

Date of adoption of the decision

11.12.2013

Reference number of the aid

SA.29832 (2013/N-3)

Member State

Netherlands

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

ING — IABF Termination

Type of Decision

New decision related to the following Commission decision: SA.27991 (C10/09)

Content

Termination of IABF contains no additional aid

Other information

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

http://ec.europa.eu/competition/elojade/isef/index.cfm

---
### §2712. Reporting on usage and spills of aqueous film-forming foam

(a) In General.—Not later than 48 hours after the Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Environment receives notice of the usage or spill of aqueous film forming foam, either as concentrate or mixed foam, at any military installation, the Deputy Assistant Secretary shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives notice of a usage or spill of greater than 10 gallons of concentrate, or greater than 300 gallons of mixed foam. Each such notice shall include each of the following information:

(1) The name of the installation where the usage or spill occurred.

(2) The date on which the usage or spill occurred.

(3) The amount, type, and specified concentration of aqueous film-forming foam that was used or spilled.

(4) The cause of the usage or spill.

(5) A summary narrative of the usage or spill.

(b) Action Plan.—Not later than 60 days after submitting notice of a usage or spill under subsection (a), the Deputy Assistant Secretary shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives an action plan for addressing such usage or spill. The action plan shall include the following:

(1) A description of what actions have been taken to arrest and clean up a spill.

(2) A description of any coordination with relevant local and State environmental protection agencies.

(Added Pub. L. 116–283, div. A, title III, §318(a), Jan. 1, 2021, 134 Stat. 3519.)
#### Clutter *v.*Mills Novelty Sales Company.

[No. 11,870.

Filed October 17, 1924.]

From Marion Circuit Court (35,557) ; *Harry O. Chamberlain,*Judge.

Action between Harry D.' Clutter and others and the Mills Novelty Sales Company. From the judgment rendered, the former appeal.

*Affirmed.*

*M. L. Clawson*and *L. Rosenberg,*for appellants.

*Samuel D. Miller, Frank C. Dailey, William H. Thompson, Albert L. Rabb, Thomas C. Stevenson*and *Perry E. O’Neal,*for appellee.

Per Curiam.

Judgment affirmed.
### §8037. Assistant Chiefs of Naval Operations

(a) There are Assistant Chiefs of Naval Operations in the Office of the Chief of Naval Operations, detailed by the Secretary of the Navy from officers on the active-duty list of the Navy and officers on the active-duty list of the Marine Corps. The Secretary of the Navy shall prescribe the number of Assistant Chiefs of Naval Operations in accordance with section 8036(a) of this title.

(b) The Assistant Chiefs of Naval Operations shall perform such duties as the Secretary of the Navy prescribes.

(Added Pub. L. 99–433, title V, §512(b), Oct. 1, 1986, 100 Stat. 1051, §5037; amended Pub. L. 108–375, div. A, title V, §502(b), Oct. 28, 2004, 118 Stat. 1875; Pub. L. 110–181, div. A, title IX, §902(b)(2), Jan. 28, 2008, 122 Stat. 273; renumbered §8037 and amended Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, §§807(a)(1), 809(a), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1834, 1840.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

Provisions similar to those in this section were contained in section 5087 of this title prior to enactment of Pub. L. 99–433.

A prior section 8037 was renumbered section 9037 of this title.

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–232, §807(a)(1), renumbered section 5037 of this title as this section.

Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 115–232, §809(a), substituted "section 8036(a)" for "section 5036(a)".

2008—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 110–181 substituted "There are Assistant Chiefs of Naval Operations in the Office of the Chief of Naval Operations," for "There are in the Office of the Chief of Naval Operations not more than three Assistant Chiefs of Naval Operations," and inserted at end "The Secretary of the Navy shall prescribe the number of Assistant Chiefs of Naval Operations in accordance with section 5036(a) of this title."

2004—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 108–375 struck out "in the line" before "of the Navy".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2018 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 115–232 effective Feb. 1, 2019, with provision for the coordination of amendments and special rule for certain redesignations, see section 800 of Pub. L. 115–232, set out as a note preceding section 3001 of this title.
#### DE BUTTS v. BACON AND OTHERS.

*If*an agent, who has, by permission of *253his principal, sold 8 *per*cent. stock, applies the money to his o,wn use, and being pressed for payment gives ii mortgage to secure the repayment of the amount of the stock with 8 *per cent,*interest thereon, it is usury.

*252ERROR to the circuit court for the district of Co* lumbia, in a suit in chancery, brought by Samuel Dp *253Butts against James Bacon and others, the object of-which was to foreclose a mortgage made by Bacon to De Butts. The condition of the,mortgage was, that if the defendant, Bacon, should pay to the complainant the interest of eight *per cent,*upon one thousand dollars of eight *percent,*stock of the United States, loaned by the complainant to the defendant, and should further pay to the complainant “ the said sum of one thousand dollars,” &c. the deed should be void.

The defendant, Bacon, pleaded the statute of usury, alleging that it was a loan of money and not of stock.

The facts of the case appeared to be, that the complainant, Samuel De Butts, intending to speculate in a voyage with Captain Elias De Butts, authorized the latter to sell ope thousand dollars of eight *per cent,*stock of the United-States, which he did through the agency of the defendant, Bacon, who received the money. The plan-of the voyage not haying been prosecuted, the complainant wished to get his stock back again, but could, not get either the stock or the money from Bacon. It was however finally agreed, that Bacon should be considered as answerable for the stock, and should give a mortgage to secure the repayment of the stock, and-eight *per cent,*interest.

The court below decided the contract to be usurious, and decreed the mortgage to be void. Which decree,' this court, after argument, by *Swann,*for the appellant, and *Votings,*for the appellee's,

Affirmed.
### §8594. Marine Corps University: acceptance of grants for faculty research for scientific, literary, and educational purposes

(a) Acceptance of Research Grants.—The Secretary of the Navy may authorize the President of the Marine Corps University to accept qualifying research grants. Any such grant may only be accepted if the work under the grant is to be carried out by a professor or instructor of one of the institutions comprising the University for a scientific, literary, or educational purpose.

(b) Qualifying Grants.—A qualifying research grant under this section is a grant that is awarded on a competitive basis by an entity referred to in subsection (c) for a research project with a scientific, literary, or educational purpose.

(c) Entities From Which Grants May Be Accepted.—A grant may be accepted under this section only from a corporation, fund, foundation, educational institution, or similar entity that is organized and operated primarily for scientific, literary, or educational purposes.

(d) Administration of Grant Funds.—The Secretary shall establish an account for administering funds received as research grants under this section. The President of the Marine Corps University shall use the funds in the account in accordance with applicable provisions of the regulations and the terms and condition of the grants received.

(e) Related Expenses.—Subject to such limitations as may be provided in appropriations Acts, appropriations available for the Marine Corps University may be used to pay expenses incurred by the University in applying for, and otherwise pursuing, the award of qualifying research grants.

(f) Regulations.—The Secretary shall prescribe regulations for the administration of this section.

(Added Pub. L. 109–163, div. A, title V, §522(d)(1), Jan. 6, 2006, 119 Stat. 3242, §7104; renumbered §8594, Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, §807(c)(2), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1836.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–232 renumbered section 7104 of this title as this section.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2018 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 115–232 effective Feb. 1, 2019, with provision for the coordination of amendments and special rule for certain redesignations, see section 800 of Pub. L. 115–232, set out as a note preceding section 3001 of this title.
H. Res. 362

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

November 5, 1999.

Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it

shall be in order without intervention of any point of order

to consider in the House the bill (H.R. 3196) making appropriations for foreign operations, export financing, and related

programs for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2000, and

for other purposes. The bill shall be considered as read for

amendment. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill and any amendment thereto to final passage

without intervening motion except: (1) one hour of debate

equally divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking

minority member of the Committee on Appropriations; (2)

the amendment printed in the report of the Committee on

Rules accompanying this resolution, if offered by Representative Young of Florida or his designee, which shall be in order

without intervention of any point of order or demand for division of the question, shall be considered as read, and shall

be separately debatable for the time specified in the report

equally divided and controlled by the proponent and an oppo-
2

•HRES 362 EH

nent; and (3) one motion to recommit with or without instructions.

SEC. 2. House Resolution 359 is laid on the table.

Attest:

Clerk.
### §12108. Enlisted members: discharge or retirement for years of service or for age

Each reserve enlisted member of the Army, Navy, Air Force, or Marine Corps who is in an active status and has reached the maximum years of service or age prescribed by the Secretary concerned shall—

(1) be transferred to the Retired Reserve if the member is qualified for such transfer and does not request (in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary concerned) not to be transferred to the Retired Reserve; or

(2) be discharged if the member is not qualified for transfer to the Retired Reserve or has requested (in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary concerned) not to be so transferred.

(Added Pub. L. 107–107, div. A, title V, §517(f)(1), Dec. 28, 2001, 115 Stat. 1095.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective on the first day of the first month that begins more than 180 days after Dec. 28, 2001, see section 517(g) of Pub. L. 107–107, set out as an Effective Date of 2001 Amendment note under section 10154 of this title.
#### § 214.16 Settlement of damages.

Any person, other than a lessee or an allottee or the heirs of a deceased allottee, claiming an interest in any leased tract or in damages thereto must furnish to the officer in charge a statment in writing showing his interest, and failure to furnish such statement shall constitute a waiver of notice and estop said person from claiming any part of such damages after the same shall have been disbursed.
§ 170.107 Should Tribes and BIA consult with planning organizations and local governments in developing projects? Yes. Tribes and BIA should consult with planning organizations and local governments in developing projects. ( a ) All regionally significant TTP projects must be: ( 1 ) Developed in cooperation with State and metropolitan planning organizations; and
( 2 ) Included in a FHWA-approved TTPTIP for inclusion in State and metropolitan plans.
( b ) BIA and Tribes are encouraged to consult with States, metropolitan and regional planning organizations, and local and municipal governments on transportation matters of common concern.