alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1




Certification of Senior Officer in Charge of the Servicing Function


of the Servicer Pursuant to Rule 15d-14(d)









SERVICER CERTIFICATION






I, Mark Kaczynski, certify that:




1.           I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Nissan Auto Receivables 2012-A Trust (the “Exchange Act Periodic Reports”);




2.           Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act Periodic Reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;




3.           Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act Periodic Reports;




4.           I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer and based on my knowledge and the compliance review conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act Periodic Reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and




5.           All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.




In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated party:  Citibank, N.A.




Date:                      June 27, 2014




By:/s/ Mark Kaczynski


Mark Kaczynski


President and Chief Executive Officer of


Nissan Motor Acceptance Corporation


(senior officer in charge of the


servicing function)
# C_2014089EN.01006701.xml

| 28.3.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 89/67 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.3.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 89/67

---

Corrigendum to Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the TFEU — Cases where the Commission raises no objections

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 50 of 21 February 2014
  )

Official Journal of the European Union C 50 of 21 February 2014

2014/C 89/12

On page 11, the text referring to the State Aid No SA.37390 is cancelled and replaced by the following:

‘Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the TFEU

Cases where the Commission raises no objections

(Text with EEA relevance, except for products falling under Annex I of the Treaty)

| Date of adoption of the decision | 4.12.2013 |
| --- | --- |
| Aid number | SA.37390 (2013/N) |
| Member State | Latvia |
| Region | — | — |
| Title (and/or name of the beneficiary) | Aid in the form of credit guarantees (amendment of SA.35910 (2012/N)) |
| Legal basis | Ministru kabineta 2009. gada 7. jūlija noteikumos Nr. 746 „Lauk saimniecības un lauku attīstības kredītu garantēšanas kārtība”” un noteikumu projekts ”Grozījumi Ministru kabineta 2009. gada 7. jūlija noteikumos Nr. 746 „Lauksaimniecības un lauku attīstības kredītu garantēšanas kārtība” ” |
| Type of measure | Scheme | — |
| Objective | Investment in processing and marketing, Investments in agricultural holdings , Setting up of young farmers |
| Form of aid | Guarantee |
| Budget | — |
| Intensity | 80 % |
| Duration (period) | 1.1.2014 - 30.12.2019 |
| Economic sectors | AGRICULTURE, FORESTRY AND FISHING |
| Name and address of the granting authority | Lauku attīstības Fonds |
| Republikas laukums 2, LV-1981 |

Date of adoption of the decision

4.12.2013

Aid number

SA.37390 (2013/N)

Member State

Latvia

Region

—

—

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

Aid in the form of credit guarantees (amendment of SA.35910 (2012/N))

Legal basis

Ministru kabineta 2009. gada 7. jūlija noteikumos Nr. 746 „Lauk saimniecības un lauku attīstības kredītu garantēšanas kārtība”” un noteikumu projekts ”Grozījumi Ministru kabineta 2009. gada 7. jūlija noteikumos Nr. 746 „Lauksaimniecības un lauku attīstības kredītu garantēšanas kārtība” ”

Type of measure

Scheme

—

Objective

Investment in processing and marketing, Investments in agricultural holdings , Setting up of young farmers

Form of aid

Guarantee

Budget

—

Intensity

80 %

Duration (period)

1.1.2014 - 30.12.2019

Economic sectors

AGRICULTURE, FORESTRY AND FISHING

Name and address of the granting authority

Lauku attīstības Fonds

Republikas laukums 2, LV-1981

Other information

—

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

http://ec.europa.eu/competition/elojade/isef/index.cfm’

---
# United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 21-1425

___________________________ United States of America lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee

v. Dewayne Gray lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant

____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri - Springfield

____________ Submitted: August 20, 2021 Filed: September 3, 2021 [Unpublished]

____________ Before SHEPHERD, GRASZ, and KOBES, Circuit Judges.

____________ PER CURIAM. Dewayne Gray appeals an order committing him under 18 U.S.C. § 4245 to the custody of the Attorney General for hospital care and treatment until he no longer needs treatment or his prison sentence expires, whichever occurs first. Upon careful review of the record, including the reports of two examining psychologists whoopined that Gray met the criteria for commitment, we conclude the district court’s 1

§ 4245 finding was supported by a preponderance of the evidence, and was not clearly erroneous. See 18 U.S.C. § 4245(d) (burden of proof and determination of mental illness and treatment need); United States v. Bean , 373 F.3d 877, 879 (8th Cir. 2004) (standard of review). The judgment of the district court is affirmed.

______________________________

1 The Honorable Douglas Harpool, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri, adopting the report and recommendation of the Honorable David P. Rush, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Missouri. -2-
AFS-10-332-E Jul 22 2010

Exemption No. 8800B Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2006-25960

Mr. Anthony S. Pierce

1221 South Elizabeth Street Denver, CO 80210

Dear Mr. Pierce:

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your petition to extend Exemption No. 8800, as amended. It explains the basis for our decision and describes its effect.

The Basis for Our Decision

By letter posted July 14, 2010, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) for an extension of Exemption No. 8800, as amended. That exemption from § 91.109(a) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations allows you to conduct certain flight training in Beechcraft Baron type aircraft that are equippe d with a functioning throwover control wheel.

In your petition, you indicate that there has been no change in the conditions and reasons relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original exemption.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition in the Federal Register because the requested extension of the exemption would not set a precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to you.

Our Decision

The FAA has determined that the justification for the issuance of Exemption No. 8800, as amended, remains valid with respect to this exemption and is in the public interest. Therefore, under the authority provided by 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator has delegated to me, I grant your petition.2

The Effect of Our Decision

Our decision extends the termination date of Exemption No. 8800, as amended, to October 31, 2013, unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

All conditions and limitations of Exemption No. 8800, as amended, remain the same. This letter must be attached to, and is a part of, Exemption No. 8800, as amended.

Sincerely,

/s/ Bradley D. Pearson Acting Director, Flight Standards

Service
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS FROM FORM 10-Q FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2000 (FOR SEC USE
ONLY) AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                      17,795,000
<SECURITIES>                                 1,618,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,523,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (599,000)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            24,008,000
<PP&E>                                      14,644,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              (3,891,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              53,082,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,886,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  1,880,000
<COMMON>                                    86,638,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 (43,228,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                53,082,000
<SALES>                                      6,700,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             6,700,000
<CGS>                                        2,063,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               10,448,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            (388,000)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (3,360,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (3,360,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (3,360,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       (.12)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.12)


</TABLE>
§ 18.3 Submission of documents and letters of transmittal. ( a ) Each document authorized or required by law to be filed for public inspection with the Office of the Federal Register and published in the Federal Register shall be sent to the Director of the Federal Register.
( b ) Except for cases involving special handling or treatment, there is no need for a letter of transmittal for a document submitted for filing and Federal Register publication.
( c ) Receipt dates are determined at the time a signed original and clear and legible copies are received.
[37 FR 23609, Nov. 4, 1972, as amended at 54 FR 9680, Mar. 7, 1989]
§ 20.310 What recurring income must be prorated? The social services worker will prorate the following recurring income: ( a ) Recurring income received by individuals over a 12-month period for less than a full year's employment (for example, income earned by teachers who are not employed for a full year);
( b ) Income received by individuals employed on a contractual basis over the term of a contract; and
( c ) Intermittent income received quarterly, semiannually, or yearly over the period covered by the income.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>                      Exhibit 27.1
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
financial statements as of and for the six months ended June 30, 2000. You
should read the the financial statements
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         5,681
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  2,522
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               8,528
<PP&E>                                         2,562
<DEPRECIATION>                                 327
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 28,540
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          3,316
<BONDS>                                        245
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       34
<OTHER-SE>                                     24,945
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   28,540
<SALES>                                        2,768
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               2,944
<CGS>                                          880
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               10,181
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             14
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (11,015)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (11,015)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.35)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0



</TABLE>
### §4373. Unit cost reports: immediate report from program manager to service acquisition executive upon breach of significant cost growth threshold

If the program manager of a major defense acquisition program for which a unit cost report has previously been submitted under section 4372 of this title determines at any time during a quarter that there is reasonable cause to believe that the program acquisition unit cost for the program (or for a designated major subprogram under the program) or the procurement unit cost for the program (or for such a subprogram), as applicable, has increased by a percentage equal to or greater than the significant cost growth threshold; and if a unit cost report indicating an increase of such percentage or more has not previously been submitted to the service acquisition executive designated by the Secretary concerned, then the program manager shall immediately submit to such service acquisition executive a unit cost report containing the information, determined as of the date of the report, required under section 4372 of this title.

(Added and amended Pub. L. 116–283, div. A, title XVIII, §1850(a), (f), Jan. 1, 2021, 134 Stat. 4265, 4266.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

The text of subsec. (c) of section 2433 of this title, which was transferred to this section and amended by Pub. L. 116–283, §1850(f), was based on Pub. L. 97–252, title XI, §1107(a)(1), Sept. 8, 1982, 96 Stat. 741, §139b; Pub. L. 98–525, title XII, §1242(b)(3), Oct. 19, 1984, 98 Stat. 2608; renumbered §2433, Pub. L. 99–433, title I, §101(a)(5), Oct. 1, 1986, 100 Stat. 995; Pub. L. 100–180, div. A, title XIII, §1314(a)(1), Dec. 4, 1987, 101 Stat. 1175; Pub. L. 101–189, div. A, title VIII, §811(a)(3), Nov. 29, 1989, 103 Stat. 1490; Pub. L. 101–510, div. A, title XIV, §1484(k)(10), Nov. 5, 1990, 104 Stat. 1719; Pub. L. 102–484, div. A, title VIII, §817(d)(3), Oct. 23, 1992, 106 Stat. 2457; Pub. L. 103–355, title III, §§3002(a)(2)(A), 3003(a)(2)(A), (c), Oct. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 3328, 3329; Pub. L. 105–85, div. A, title VIII, §833(a), (b), Nov. 18, 1997, 111 Stat. 1842, 1843; Pub. L. 109–163, div. A, title VIII, §802(b)(1), Jan. 6, 2006, 119 Stat. 3368; Pub. L. 110–417, [div. A], title VIII, §811(c)(3), Oct. 14, 2008, 122 Stat. 4522.

#### Amendments

2021—Pub. L. 116–283, §1850(f), transferred subsec. (c) of section 2433 of this title to this section, struck out subsec. designation, and substituted "section 4372 of this title" for "subsection (b)" in two places.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section and amendment by Pub. L. 116–283 effective Jan. 1, 2022, with additional provisions for delayed implementation and applicability of existing law, see section 1801(d) of Pub. L. 116–283, set out as an Effective Date of 2021 Amendment note preceding section 3001 of this title.
#### William H. Wentz *et al. v.*Louis Wilson *et al.*

New *trial—verdict against the evidence.*The judgment of the court below is reversed in this case on the ground that the evidence fails to sustain the verdict.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Warren county ; the Hon. Arthur A. Smith, Judge, presiding.

The opinion states the case.

Messrs. Stewart *&*Phelps, for the appellants.

Mr. J. W. Davidson and Mr. John Porter, for the appellees.

Mr. Chief Justice Breese

delivered the opinion of the Court:

This is an appeal from the Warren circuit court. The suit was assumpsit, on a promissory note, and the pleas were, a total failure of consideration, a set-off, and partial failure of consid-' eration.

The jury found for the defendants. The note, it appears, was given for a threshing machine, described as a number 2 machine, by the agent of plaintiffs, who sold it.

It further appears, defendant, Lewis Wilson, had, at first, ordered a number 1 machine, on which there was a warranty by plaintiffs. He afterwards changed his mind, and ordered a cheaper kind, a number 2 machine, and' now seeks to apply the warranty given on number 1, to number 2. His complaint is, that the machine does not clean the grain well; that a large per centage is left in the straw.

*441We are not satisfied the evidence justifies this, nor are we satisfied, if the warranty did attach to this machine, that it has been broken. The weight of evidence, we are inclined to think, is decidedly in favor of the machine. The purchaser has it in his possession, never having offered to return it, and has operated it repeatedly with success. He never complained of any defect until the note became due, but, on the contrary, said it was one of the best machines he ever saw.

There is no question of law mooted, and we dispose of the case by reversing the judgment on the ground the evidence does not sustain the verdict, and a new trial should be had.

The judgment is reversed.

*Judgment reversed.*
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 3 (Thursday, January 5, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 514]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-33809]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[LLNV05600.L14300000.EU0000.LVTFF1000770.241A00; N-76649; 12-08807; 
TAS: 14X5232]


Correction for Conveyance of Public Lands for Recreation and 
Public Purposes in Clark County, NV

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of Realty Action.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This Notice corrects a Notice of Realty Action published in 
the Federal Register on April 26, 2004, (69 FR22547-22548), which 
listed an incorrect legal land description for the South Hills Church 
Community in the City of Las Vegas, Clark County, Nevada.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Shawna Woods, (702) 515-5099, or 
email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#c4b7b3ababa0b784a6a8a9eaa3abb2"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="84f7f3ebebe0f7c4e6e8e9aae3ebf2">[email protected]</span></a>. Persons who use a telecommunications device for 
the deaf (TDD) may call the Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 
1-(800) 877-8339 to contact the above individual during normal business 
hours. The FIRS is available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, to leave a 
message or question with the above individual. You will receive a reply 
during normal business hours.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The erroneous legal land description is on 
page 22547, 3rd column, line 6. The legal land description is corrected 
to read:

Mount Diablo Meridian

T. 22 S., R. 61 E.,
    Sec. 24, N\1/2\SW\1/4\SE\1/4\NE\1/4\, N\1/2\SE\1/4\SE\1/4\NE\1/
4\.

    The area described contains 10 acres, more or less in Clark 
County, Nevada.

    Authority: 43 CFR 2741.5.

Vanessa L. Hice,
Assistant Field Manager, Las Vegas Field Office.
[FR Doc. 2011-33809 Filed 1-4-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-HC-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
###### Editorial Note on Part 224

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 224 appear at 84 FR 69611, Dec. 18, 2019.

#### § 224.159 How will reassumption affect valid existing rights or lawful actions taken before the effective date of the reassumption?

Reassumption will not affect valid existing rights that vested before the effective date of the reassumption or lawful actions the Tribe and the Secretary took before the effective date of the reassumption.
### Hydraulic effects of changes in bottom land vegetation on three major floods, Gila River, in southeastern Arizona

By: Durl Edward Burkham

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/pp655J

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf) 
- NGMDB Index Page:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**                            (html)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

No abstract available.

#### Study Area

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.