alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Page 1 of 3

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

FLORIDA WILDLIFE FEDERATION, INC.,

et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v. CASE NO. 4:08cv324-RH/WCS

LISA P. JACKSON, etc., et al.,

Defendants.

________________________________________/

ORDER EXTENDING THE DEADLINE FOR

PUBLISHING A NOTICE OF RULEMAKING

FOR LAKES AND FLOWING WATERS

The defendants Environmental Protection Agency and Administrator

(collectively “the EPA”) have moved to extend by 30 days—to November 14,

2010—the deadline set out in paragraph 6 of the consent decree entered December

30, 2009, ECF No. 153. The deadline is for publishing a notice of final rulemaking

for numeric water quality criteria for lakes and flowing waters. No party has

addressed, and this order expresses no opinion on, the question whether an

extension to November 14—a Sunday—will have the effect of extending the

deadline to November 15.

Case 4:08-cv-00324-RH -WCS Document 192 Filed 10/27/10 Page 1 of 3
Page 2 of 3

Case No: 4:08cv324-RH/WCS

The plaintiffs have consented to the motion for an extension. Two

intervenors—the South Florida Water Management District and the Florida Water

Environment Association Utility Council, Inc.—have filed responses in opposition

to the motion. But neither asserts the extension is unwarranted. The EPA has

shown good grounds for the requested extension. This order grants it.

Instead of asserting that the requested extension is unwarranted, the

responding intervenors assert that the requested extension is not long enough, and

they assert, in effect, that the consent decree should not have been entered in the

first place. The Water Management District also asserts that I have no jurisdiction

to grant the extension because an appeal is pending from the consent decree. The

assertion that a longer extension is needed, even if true, would not warrant a denial

of the 30-day extension the EPA has requested. And the assertion that the

requested extension is beyond my jurisdiction is wrong.

The consent decree specifically authorizes an extension request of precisely

this kind. See Consent Decree, ECF No. 153, at 9-10. The pendency of an appeal

does not deprive a district court of jurisdiction to enforce and take action under an

injunction. That is all the EPA has requested and this order provides.

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED:

The EPA’s motion, ECF No. 188, to extend the deadline for publishing a

Case 4:08-cv-00324-RH -WCS Document 192 Filed 10/27/10 Page 2 of 3
Page 3 of 3

Case No: 4:08cv324-RH/WCS

notice of final rule making for numeric water quality criteria for lakes and flowing

waters under paragraph 6 of the consent decree is GRANTED. The deadline is

extended to November 14, 2010. 

SO ORDERED on October 27, 2010.

s/Robert L. Hinkle 

United States District Judge

Case 4:08-cv-00324-RH -WCS Document 192 Filed 10/27/10 Page 3 of 3
# C_2013253EN.01001901.xml

| 3.9.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 253/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.9.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 253/19

---

Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries

2013/C 253/15

In accordance with Article 35(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), a decision has been taken to close the fishery as set down in the following table:

1

| Date and time of closure | 7.8.2013 |
| --- | --- |
| Duration | 7.8.2013-31.12.2013 |
| Member State | Germany |
| Stock or group of stocks | HER/3D-R30 |
| Species | Herring (Clupea harengus) |
| Zone | Union waters of Subdivisions 25-27, 28.2, 29 and 32 |
| Type(s) of fishing vessels | — |
| Reference number | 32/BAL |

Date and time of closure

7.8.2013

Duration

7.8.2013-31.12.2013

Member State

Germany

Stock or group of stocks

HER/3D-R30

Species

Herring (Clupea harengus)

Clupea harengus

Zone

Union waters of Subdivisions 25-27, 28.2, 29 and 32

Type(s) of fishing vessels

—

Reference number

32/BAL

---

(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.

1

---
### §7213. Corps of Engineers: assignment or transfer of officers to duties involving civil functions

Officers of the Corps of Engineers may be assigned or transferred to and from duties involving the civil functions of the Corps of Engineers only with the approval of the Secretary of the Army.

(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 201, §3533; Pub. L. 89–718, §26, Nov. 2, 1966, 80 Stat. 1119; renumbered §7213, Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, §808(b)(6), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1838.)

| Revised section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 3533 | 10:506(c) (proviso). | Aug. 7, 1947, ch. 512, §502(c) (proviso), 61 Stat. 883. |

The words "and reassignments" are omitted as surplusage.

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 7213, act Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 445, related to relief of contractors and their employees from losses by enemy action, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 103–160, div. A, title VIII, §824(a)(3), Nov. 30, 1993, 107 Stat. 1707.

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–232 renumbered section 3533 of this title as this section.

1966—Pub. L. 89–718 struck out provisions requiring the recommendation of the Chief of Engineers in order to transfer officers of the Corps of Engineers to or from the civil functions of the Corps of Engineers.

#### Effective Date of 2018 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 115–232 effective Feb. 1, 2019, with provision for the coordination of amendments and special rule for certain redesignations, see section 800 of Pub. L. 115–232, set out as a note preceding section 3001 of this title.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 210 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                         June 22, 1999.
    Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker 
may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule XVIII, declare the House resolved into the 
Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of the 
bill (H.R. 659) to authorize appropriations for the protection of Paoli and 
Brandywine Battlefields in Pennsylvania, to direct the National Park Service to 
conduct a special resource study of Paoli and Brandywine Battlefields, to 
authorize the Valley Forge Museum of the American Revolution at Valley Forge 
National Historical Park, and for other purposes. The first reading of the bill 
shall be dispensed with. General debate shall be confined to the bill and shall 
not exceed one hour equally divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking 
minority member of the Committee on Resources. After general debate the bill 
shall be considered for amendment under the five-minute rule. It shall be in 
order to consider as an original bill for the purpose of amendment under the 
five-minute rule the amendment in the nature of a substitute recommended by the 
Committee on Resources now printed in the bill. The committee amendment in the 
nature of a substitute shall be considered by title rather than by section. Each 
title shall be considered as read. During consideration of the bill for 
amendment, the Chairman of the Committee of the Whole may accord priority in 
recognition on the basis of whether the Member offering an amendment has caused 
it to be printed in the portion of the Congressional Record designated for that 
purpose in clause 8 of rule XVIII. Amendments so printed shall be considered as 
read. The Chairman of the Committee of the Whole may: (1) postpone until a time 
during further consideration in the Committee of the Whole a request for a 
recorded vote on any amendment; and (2) reduce to five minutes the minimum time 
for electronic voting on any postponed question that follows another electronic 
vote without intervening business, provided that the minimum time for electronic 
voting on the first in any series of questions shall be 15 minutes. At the 
conclusion of consideration of the bill for amendment the Committee shall rise 
and report the bill to the House with such amendments as may have been adopted. 
Any Member may demand a separate vote in the House on any amendment adopted in 
the Committee of the Whole to the bill or to the committee amendment in the 
nature of a substitute. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on 
the bill and amendments thereto to final passage without intervening motion 
except one motion to recommit with or without instructions.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Work, Japanese Defense Leader Discuss Evolving Security Environment

By DoD News, Defense Media Activity

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More News/Articles
# C_2006212EN.01004602.xml

| 2.9.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 212/46 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.9.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 212/46

---

Order of the Court of First Instance of 27 June 2006 — Marker Völkl v OHIM — Icon Health & Fitness Italia (MOTION)

(Case T-217/05) (1)

1

(2006/C 212/79)

Language of the case: German

Language of the case: German

The President of the Fifth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 205, 20.8.2005.

1

---
REGISTRATION 

69361-32 

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49 *Confidential Statement of Formula may be entitled to confide
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84 *Inert ingredient information may be entitled to confidential treatment*
85
86
87
88
89
90

tement of Formula may be entitled to confidential treatment*
#### § 183.3 Does the American Indian Trust Fund Management Reform Act of 1994 apply to this part?

Yes. We will manage and make distributions from the Trust Fund in accordance with the American Indian Trust Funds Management Act of 1994 (Management Act), except where the Management Act conflicts with the Settlement Act or this part. If there is a conflict, we will follow the provisions of the Settlement Act or this part.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Surface Transportation Board

The Surface Transportation Board has received a request from Mayer Brown LLP as outside counsel for BNSF Railway Company (WB461-17—01/25/11) for permission to use certain data from the Board's 1999 through 2009 Carload Waybill Samples. A copy of this request may be obtained from the Office of Economics.

The waybill sample contains confidential railroad and shipper data; therefore, if any parties object to these requests, they should file their objections with the Director of the Board's Office of Economics within 14 calendar days of the date of this notice. The rules for release of waybill data are codified at 49 CFR 1244.9.

*Contact:*                     Scott Decker, (202) 245-0330.                

Andrea Pope-Matheson,

Clearance Clerk.

[FR Doc. 2011-3411 Filed 2-15-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4915-01-P
EXHIBIT 31.2

                        CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION
                          302 OF THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT

I, Randy Hibma, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Satellite
Enterprises, Corp.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and







Date:  May 23, 2005


/s/ Randy Hibma
-----------------------
Randy Hibma,
Chief Financial Officer
### §8701. Authority to provide for necessary salvage facilities

(a) Authority.—The Secretary of the Navy may provide, by contract or otherwise, necessary salvage facilities for public and private vessels.

(b) Coordination With Secretary of Homeland Security.—The Secretary shall submit to the Secretary of Homeland Security for comment each proposed contract for salvage facilities that affects the interests of the Department of Homeland Security.

(c) Limitation.—The Secretary of the Navy may enter into a term contract under subsection (a) only if the Secretary determines that available commercial salvage facilities are inadequate to meet the requirements of national defense.

(d) Public Notice.—The Secretary may not enter into a contract under subsection (a) until the Secretary has provided public notice of the intent to enter into such a contract.

(e) Salvage Facilities Defined.—In this section, the term "salvage facilities" includes equipment and gear utilized to prevent, abate, or minimize damage to the environment.

(Added Pub. L. 104–106, div. A, title X, §1015, Feb. 10, 1996, 110 Stat. 424, §7361; amended Pub. L. 107–296, title XVII, §1704(b)(1), (6), Nov. 25, 2002, 116 Stat. 2314; Pub. L. 108–136, div. A, title III, §315(a), Nov. 24, 2003, 117 Stat. 1431; renumbered §8701, Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, §807(d)(3), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1836.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–232 renumbered section 7361 of this title as this section.

2003—Subsec. (e). Pub. L. 108–136 added subsec. (e).

2002—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 107–296 substituted "of Homeland Security" for "of Transportation" in heading and in two places in text.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2018 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 115–232 effective Feb. 1, 2019, with provision for the coordination of amendments and special rule for certain redesignations, see section 800 of Pub. L. 115–232, set out as a note preceding section 3001 of this title.

#### Effective Date of 2002 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 107–296 effective on the date of transfer of the Coast Guard to the Department of Homeland Security, see section 1704(g) of Pub. L. 107–296, set out as a note under section 101 of this title.
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > The Economy at Mid-1972

              																	Council of Economic Advisers (U.S.)					 and 	United States. Congress. Joint Economic Committee, 1956-. 						*The Economy at Mid-1972 : Testimony of the Council of Economic Advisers Submitted to the Joint Economic Committee of the Congress*,										August 1972,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/231,			accessed on September 7, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 291 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                    September 15, 1999.
    Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in order to 
consider the conference report to accompany the bill (H.R. 2490) making 
appropriations for the Treasury Department, the United States Postal Service, 
the Executive Office of the President, and certain Independent Agencies, for the 
fiscal year ending September 30, 2000, and for other purposes. All points of 
order against the conference report and against its consideration are waived. 
The conference report shall be considered as read.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
Order entered January 7, 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**
No. 05
- 14
- 01520
- CV
IN THE INTEREST OF C .L., JR., A CHILD On Appeal from the 304th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 13
- 136
- W 

### O R DER
The Court GRANTS the State’s January 6, 2015 motion to extend time to file its appellate brief. We ORDER the State to file its brief on or before January 21, 2015.

/s/ DAVID EVANS PRESIDING JUSTICE
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation

85-26

Withdrawn on June 1, 2021
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation 

85-26 

November 22, 1985 

REFERENCE: 

 [*1] 4022 Benefits Guaranteed 

OPINION: 

You have indicated that the business of your client, the * * * Company will be purchased in a leveraged buy-out by

a few of the current employees through a newly organized corporation. It is expected that most of the employees will

continue to work for the new corporation with a significant reduction in benefits and possibly a reduction in salary. In

connection with the sale, your client plans to terminate its three pension plans. You have indicated that the assets of all

three plans are insufficient to pay benefits guaranteed under Title IV of ERISA, so that following the plan terminations,

PBGC will become responsible for unfunded guaranteed benefits. You have asked whether those employees eligible

for unreduced retirement (30 years of service) who continue to work in similar jobs for the new company can be treated

as retired from the * * * Company. 

We assume that the question is one of first impression that is not addressed in the plan documents, since * * * is the

plan sponsor and plan administrator. 

Those employees who continue to work for the new company should not be treated, under the terms of the * * *

plans, as eligible for retirement. As one [*2] court has observed, "[i]nitially, it would appear most unlikely that any

employee would reasonably believe that early retirement benefits could commence while he or she was still working at

the same job even though a different employer has taken over salary obligations." Esler v. Northrop Corp., Case No.

20537-B (W.D. Mo. Aug. 4, 1981) Slip Op. p. 5. 

Further, we note that, under certain circumstances involving continued employment with a buyer or other successor,

the PBGC does not guarantee early retirement benefits regardless of the terms of a pension plan. Title IV was intended,

first and foremost, to guarantee retirement benefits, and was not intended, for example, to subsidize a compensation

package for employees of an ongoing business. 

The * * * plans have not yet terminated and been through the PBGC's normal administrative process. While I fully

expect that the views expressed above would be consistent with any final PBGC determination, this letter does not

constitute, and the PBGC has not made, a final agency decision. 

Mitchell L. Strickler 

Acting General Counsel