alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the
undersigned, as chief executive officer of Iron Age Corporation (the
Company), does hereby certify that to the undersigneds knowledge:

|   |  |                                                                                                                                                             
|-- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|1) |  | the Companys 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
|  
|2) |  | the information contained in the Companys 10-Q fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.



|                                                                
|----------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/William J. Mills                                             
|                                                                
|William J. Mills
Chief Executive Officer, President and Director

Dated: September 10, 2002
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 

Home : Media : Photos

slide show module

Japan, ROK, US conduct trilateral maritime exercise in the Indo-Pacific

MARFORPAC conducts HIMARS live-fire exercise during Warrior Shield 24

PACAF, PACFLT aircraft conduct an elephant walk at Kadena Air Base

PACAF aircraft conduct large force exercise over the Pacific Ocean

USS Abraham Lincoln conducts live-fire exercise in the Pacific Ocean

USCG Cutter Oliver Henry rescues three mariners stranded on a remote atoll in Micronesia

MARFORPAC, USS Boxer conduct routine flight operations in the Pacific Ocean

USS Theodore Roosevelt conducts routine flight operations in the Philippine Sea

USS Ralph Johnson launches Standard Missile 2 during live-fire exercise in the Philippine Sea

USS Higgins conducts live-fire exercise in the Philippine Sea
#### § 457.140 Employment.

No qualified handicapped person shall, on the basis of handicap, be subjected to discrimination in employment under any program or activity conducted by the agency. The definitions, requirements, and procedures of section 501 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 U.S.C. 791), as established by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission in 29 CFR part 1613, shall apply to employment in federally conducted programs or activities.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          61,737
<SECURITIES>                                     5,498
<RECEIVABLES>                                   13,854
<ALLOWANCES>                                       818
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                94,511
<PP&E>                                          20,737
<DEPRECIATION>                                   8,289
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 117,055
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           16,776
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                     100,279
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   117,055
<SALES>                                         36,375
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                36,375
<CGS>                                            2,758
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   42,902
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (6,932)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (786)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (6,146)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (6,146)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.12)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.12)


</TABLE>
Skip Navigation

#         Archive-It      

Login

      - HOME
      - EXPLORE
      - LEARN MORE
      - CONTACT US

### The leading web archiving service for collecting and accessing cultural heritage on the web 

Built at the Internet Archive

        - Explore
        - Federal Depository Library Program Web Archive
        - MEDPAC, The Medicare Payment Advisory Commission

#  MEDPAC, The Medicare Payment Advisory Commission 

**Collected by:** Federal Depository Library Program Web Archive 

**Archived since:**Mar, 2016

**Description:**
The Medicare Payment Advisory Commission (MedPAC) is an independent congressional agency established by the Balanced Budget Act of 1997 (P.L. 105-33) to advise the U.S. Congress on issues affecting the Medicare program. The Commission's statutory mandate is quite broad: In addition to advising the Congress on payments to private health plans participating in Medicare and providers in Medicare's traditional fee-for-service program, MedPAC is also tasked with analyzing access to care, quality of care, and other issues affecting Medicare.

**Subject:**    	    Government - US Federal,     	    Health & Medicine

**Creator:**    	    The Medicare Payment Advisory Commission

**Language:**    	    English

**Collector:**    	    U.S. Government Publishing Office

## Narrow Your Results

### 

            There are no further ways to narrow your results.           

Sites for this collection are listed below. Narrow your results at left, or enter a search query below to		      find a site, specific URL or to search the text of archived webpages.
Clear

              - Sites
              - Search Page Text

Page 1 of 1  (4 Total Results)

**Sort By:**
                - Title (A-Z)
                - Title (Z-A)
                - URL (A-Z)
                - URL (Z-A)

### URL:     http://www.medpac.gov/

	  	Loading Wayback Capture Info...	  

Loading video data...

### URL:     https://twitter.com/medicarepayment/

	  	Loading Wayback Capture Info...	  

Loading video data...

### URL:     https://www.linkedin.com/company/medicare-payment-advisory-commission

	  	Loading Wayback Capture Info...	  

Loading video data...

### URL:     https://www.medpac.gov/

	  	Loading Wayback Capture Info...	  

Loading video data...

Page 1 of 1  (4 Total Results)

Archive It

#### Archive-It 

*Built at the Internet Archive*
2014 Archive-ItThe leading web archiving service for collecting and accessing  cultural heritage on the web 

      - Home
      - Learn More         - About Archive-It
        - News/Press
        - Meet the Team
        - Publications
      - Contact Us
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Employers & Practitioners 
-  Mortality, Retirement and PV Max Guarantee 
-  ERISA Section 4044 Retirement Assumptions 

This page has not been translated. Please go to PBGC.gov's Spanish home page for more information available in Spanish.

Esta página no ha sido traducida. Por favor vaya a la página principal del sitio de español de PBGC para ver información disponible en español.

# ERISA Section 4044 Retirement Assumptions

November 29, 2023

## Expected Retirement Assumptions

For ERISA section 4044 calculations, the age at which benefits are assumed to commence depends on two factors:

(1) whether the benefit amount is considered low, medium or high (the **Retirement Rate Category**), and(2) when participants, under the provisions of their plan, can begin receiving reduced and unreduced benefits (the **XRA tables**).

### Retirement Rate Category (low, medium, high) Table for valuations beginning in:

2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008

### XRA Table for participants with benefits in the:

                          - **Low category**  [Excel]
                          - **Medium category**  [Excel]
                          - **High category**  [Excel]

##           Related Information      

Subscribe to Interest Rate Updates

##           Present Value of PBGC Maximum Guarantee          

Find the present value of PBGC’s maximum guarantee for purposes of complying with IRC §436 benefit restrictions.

##           ERISA Mortality Tables          

Access current and historical mortality rates for valuing annuities in terminating single-employer plans and of missing participants in such plans. ERISA Section 4044 (for valuing annuities in distress and involuntary single-employer plan terminations)ERISA Section 4050 (for valuing annuities of missing participants)
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS 

Appeal of -- ) 

) 

Hensel Phelps Kiewit Joint Venture ) 

) 

Under Contract No. W912DR-13-C-0005 ) 

APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT: 

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: 

ASBCA No. 60334 

Todd R. Metz, Esq. 

Brian R. Dugdale, Esq. 

Varela, Lee, Metz & Guarino, LLP 

Tysons Comer, VA 

R. Miles Stanislaw, Esq. 

Watt, Tieder, Hoffar & Fitzgerald, LLP 

Seattle, WA 

Thomas H. Gourlay, Jr., Esq. 

Engineer Chief Trial Attorney 

Scott C. Seufert, Esq. 

David B. Jerger, Esq. 

Assistant District Counsel 

U.S. Army Engineer District, Baltimore 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

The dispute has been settled. The appeal is dismissed with prejudice. 

Dated: 10 July 2017 

DAVID D' ALESSANDRIS 

Administrative Judge 

Armed Services Board 

of Contract Appeals 
I 

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed 

Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 60334, Appeal of Hensel Phelps 

Kiewit Joint Venture, rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. 

Dated: 

2 

JEFFREY D. GARDIN 

Recorder, Armed Services 

Board of Contract Appeals
#### STATE OF CONNECTICUT *v.*LUIS ORTIZ

Decided July 16, 2004

*Pamela S. Nagy,*special public defender, in support of the petition.

*Denise B. Smoker,*assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.

NORCOTT, J.,

did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.
---

CONSENT OF TERRY BRAUN

I hereby consent to the inclusion in this Annual Report on Form
10-K, which is being filed with the United States Securities and Exchange
Commission, of references to my name and to the use of the technical report
titled NI 43-101 Preliminary Economic Assessment, Ambler Project, Kobuk, AK
dated effective February 1, 2012 (the Technical Report).

I also consent to the incorporation by reference in NovaCopper
Inc.s Registration Statement (No. 333-185127) on Form S-3 and Registration
Statement (No. 333-181020) on Form S-8, of references to my name and to the use
of the Technical Report, which is included in the Annual Report on Form
10-K.

|DATED: February
      12, 2013 | 
|------------------------------ | 
|                               | 
|                               | 
|/s/ Terry Braun                | 
|Name: Terry Braun              | 

---
H. Res. 135

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

April 12, 1999.

Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution the

House shall be considered to have taken from the Speaker’s

table the bill H.R. 98, with the amendments of the Senate

thereto, and to have—

(1) concurred in the amendment of the Senate to

the title; and

(2) concurred in the amendment of the Senate to

the text with the following amendment:

At the end of the Senate amendment, add the following:

Page 2, line 3, strike ‘‘March’’ and insert ‘‘May’’.

Attest:

Clerk.
# C_2006212EN.01004702.xml

| 2.9.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 212/47 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.9.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 212/47

---

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 12 July 2006 — D v Commission

(Case F-18/05) (1)

1

(Occupational disease - Request for recognition that the aggravation of the disease from which the applicant is suffering is of occupational origin)

(2006/C 212/83)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: D (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: J. Van Rossum, S. Orlandi and J.-N. Louis, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: J. Currall, Agent)

Defendant:

:

Re:

Annulment of the Commission's decision to reject the applicant's request for recognition that the aggravation of the disease from which he is suffering is of occupational origin.

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of the Commission of the European Communities rejecting the request for recognition that the applicant's disease or aggravation thereof is of occupational origin. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of the Commission of the European Communities rejecting the request for recognition that the applicant's disease or aggravation thereof is of occupational origin.

| 2. | Orders the Commission of the European Communities to pay all of the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Commission of the European Communities to pay all of the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 155, 25.6.2005 (case initially registered at the Court of First Instance of the European Communities under Case T-147/05 and transferred to the Civil Service Tribunal of the European Union by order of 15.12.2005).

1

---
### §8282. Insane members of the naval service

A member of the naval service who becomes insane may be placed in the hospital for the insane that, in the opinion of the Secretary of the Navy, is most convenient and will provide the most beneficial treatment.

(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 387, §6202; renumbered §8282, Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, §807(b)(11), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1835.)

| Revised section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 6202 | 34 U.S.C. 595. | R.S. 1551; July 1, 1916, ch. 209, §1, 39 Stat. 309. |

The words "that * * * will provide the most beneficial treatment" are substituted for the words "best calculated to promise a restoration of reason" for clarity. The second sentence of 34 U.S.C. 595 is omitted as superseded. It provided a method by which the Secretary of the Navy, in his discretion, could compensate other agencies for expenses involved in hospitalizing insane naval patients. Other provisions of law, principally 24 U.S.C. 31, 31 U.S.C. 686, and 37 U.S.C. 284, and regulations, principally Executive Order 10122, of April 14, 1950, establish the method currently used.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–232 renumbered section 6202 of this title as this section.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2018 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 115–232 effective Feb. 1, 2019, with provision for the coordination of amendments and special rule for certain redesignations, see section 800 of Pub. L. 115–232, set out as a note preceding section 3001 of this title.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Employers & Practitioners 
-  Reporting & Disclosure 
-  Reportable Events Reference Sheet For Small Plans 

This page has not been translated. Please go to PBGC.gov's Spanish home page for more information available in Spanish.

Esta página no ha sido traducida. Por favor vaya a la página principal del sitio de español de PBGC para ver información disponible en español.

# Reportable Events Reference Sheet for Small Plans

This is a quick checklist to help identify possible reportable events for small plans (plans with 100 or fewer participants).﻿﻿﻿ ﻿﻿﻿This page is available as a downloadable PDF file for future reference: Reportable Events Reference Sheet for Small Plans

Information on filing requirements, including due dates and whether a waiver from reporting is available can be found on PBGC’s Reportable Events page.  If you require additional assistance, please contact us at post-event.report@pbgc.gov or call 202-229-4070.

December 6, 2019

##           Online Premium Filing (My PAA)          

My PAA is PBGC’s secure online application for electronic submission of premium filings and payments.

Log In to My PAA

Create a New Account

How to Use My PAA
IV

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 49

Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on Standards of Official

Conduct in the One Hundred Sixth Congress.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 9, 1999

Mr. SMITH of Texas (for himself and Mr. BERMAN) submitted the following

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on House Administration

RESOLUTION

Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on

Standards of Official Conduct in the One Hundred Sixth

Congress.

1 Resolved,

2 SECTION 1. AMOUNTS FOR COMMITTEE EXPENSES.

3 For the expenses of the Committee on Standards of

4 Official Conduct (hereafter in this resolution referred to

5 as the ‘‘Committee’’), including the expenses of all staff

6 salaries, there shall be paid, out of the applicable accounts

7 of the House of Representatives for committee salaries

8 and expenses, not more than $2,860,915 for the One Hun9 dred Sixth Congress.
2

• HRES 49 IH

1 SEC. 2. SESSION LIMITATIONS.

2 Of the amount specified in section 1—

3 (1) not more than $1,382,916 shall be available

4 for expenses incurred during the period beginning at

5 noon on January 3, 1999, and ending immediately

6 before noon on January 3, 2000; and

7 (2) not more than $1,477,999 shall be available

8 for expenses incurred during the period beginning at

9 noon on January 3, 2000, and ending immediately

10 before noon on January 3, 2001.

11 SEC. 3. VOUCHERS.

12 Payments under this resolution shall be made on

13 vouchers authorized by the Committee, signed by the

14 Chairman of the Committee, and approved in the manner

15 directed by the Committee on House Administration.

16 SEC. 4. REGULATIONS.

17 Amounts made available under this resolution shall

18 be expended in accordance with regulations prescribed by

19 the Committee on House Administration.

Æ
[No. 5078.]

[No. 2644 C. A.]

#### The Hassell Iron Works Co. v. Cohen et al.

1. Contracts — Sales—Breach by Buyer — Actions—Measure of Damages.

Where a,purchaser of personal property, which is to be delivered at a specified time and place and at a stipulated price, refuses to receive and pay therefor, the seller’s measure of damages, where no part of the purchase price has been paid and the property in the meantime has declined in price, is the difference between the contract price and the current price at the place and time of delivery. — P. 354.

2. Verdict — Instructions—Evidence.

Where the verdict is not in harmony with the instructions and is not supported by any evidence, the judgment must be reversed. — P. 355.

*354
      *Appeal from the District Court of El Paso County.*

*Hon. Wm. P. Seeds, Judge.*

Action by Max Cohen and Leon Cohen, copartners under the firm name of Max Cohen and Brother, against The Hassell Iron Works Company. From, a judgment in favor of plaintiffs, defendant appeals.

*Reversed.*

Mr. J. W. Sheaeor, for appellant.

Mr. Robert Kerr, for appellee.

Mr. Justice Bailey

delivered the opinion of the court:

The court correctly instructed the jury that: '

> “When a purchaser of personal property which by the terms of the purchase is to be delivered at a specified'time and place and at a stipulated price, refused to receive and pay for the property and no part of the purchase price has been paid, and if the price in the meantime declined, then in an action by the vendor against the vendee for refusing to comply with the contract, the proper rule of damages is the difference between the contract price and the current price at the time and place of delivery.”

According to the testimony of the plaintiffs, there was no current price for the goods in question at the place of delivery provided in the contract. Plaintiffs introduced proof as to the market price at Chicago, St. Louis and Kansas City, and that according to the prices prevailing at those places, plaintiffs should have recovered judgment for $765.57, as their testimony shows.

The testimony on behalf of defendant is that there was a market price at the place named in the contract and that the difference between the contract price of the goods and the current price at the place *355of delivery, according to the testimony introduced on behalf of defendant, was $352.50

The verdict of the jury was for $517.96 and l-3c. This verdict is not in harmony with the instruction and is not supported by any evidence. If the theory .of plaintiff should be taken, the verdict should have been $765.57. If that of the defendant should be taken, it should have been $352.50.

There being no evidence upon which the verdict can be sustained, the judgment based upon the verdict must be *reversed.*— Robeson *v.*Miller, 4 C. A. 313.

The judgment will be reversed and the cause remanded. „ _

*Reversed.*

Chief Justice Gabbert and Mr. Justice Goddard concur.