alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 271 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                        August 3, 1999.
    Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker 
may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule XVIII, declare the House resolved into the 
Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of the 
bill (H.R. 987) to require the Secretary of Labor to wait for completion of a 
National Academy of Sciences study before promulgating a standard or guideline 
on ergonomics. The first reading of the bill shall be dispensed with. General 
debate shall be confined to the bill and shall not exceed one hour equally 
divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of the 
Committee on Education and the Workforce. After general debate the bill shall be 
considered for amendment under the five-minute rule for a period not to exceed 
two hours. The bill shall be considered as read. During consideration of the 
bill for amendment, the Chairman of the Committee of the Whole may accord 
priority in recognition on the basis of whether the Member offering an amendment 
has caused it to be printed in the portion of the Congressional Record 
designated for that purpose in clause 8 of rule XVIII. Amendments so printed 
shall be considered as read. The Chairman of the Committee of the Whole may: (1) 
postpone until a time during further consideration in the Committee of the Whole 
a request for a recorded vote on any amendment; and (2) reduce to five minutes 
the minimum time for electronic voting on any postponed question that follows 
another electronic vote without intervening business, provided that the minimum 
time for electronic voting on the first in any series of questions shall be 15 
minutes. At the conclusion of consideration of the bill for amendment the 
Committee shall rise and report the bill to the House with such amendments as 
may have been adopted. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on 
the bill and amendments thereto to final passage without intervening motion 
except one motion to recommit with or without instructions.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Steven C. Bierman, certify that:

 

1.                                      I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of CNH Equipment Trust 2012-A (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);

 

2.                                      Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.                                      Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

 

4.                                      I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer and based on my knowledge and the compliance review conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and

 

5.                                      All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

 

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas.

 

----

 

March 27, 2014

 

 
|   | By:    | /s/   Steven C. Bierman                                          |
|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Name:  | Steven   C. Bierman                                              |
|   | Title: | President   (senior officer in charge of the servicing function) |

 

----
§ 170.438 How must BIA, FHWA, or a Tribe inform the public of when a hearing is held? ( a ) When BIA, FHWA, or a Tribe holds a hearing under this part, it must notify the public of the hearing by publishing a notice with information about the project, how to attend the hearing, and where copies of documents can be obtained or viewed.
( b ) BIA or the Tribe must publish the notice by: ( 1 ) Posting the notice and publishing it in a newspaper of general circulation at least 30 days before the public hearing; and,
( 2 ) Sending a courtesy copy of the notice to each affected Tribe and BIA Regional Office.
( c ) A second notice for a hearing is optional.
### Geologic implications of aeromagnetic data in the Pend Oreille area, Idaho and Montana

By: Elizabeth R. KingJack Edward HarrisonAllan Bingham Griggs

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/pp646D

#### Links

- More information:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**                            (html)
-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plate:  **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
§ 141.7 Bond requirement for a reservation business. ( a ) An applicant for a license or renewal of a license to operate a reservation business shall at the time the application is submitted furnish a bond on a form provided by the Commissioner in the name of the applicant in the amount of ten thousand dollars ($10,000) or such larger sum as the Commissioner may designate, with two (2) on more sureties approved by the Commissioner or with a guaranty company qualified under the Act of August 13, 1894 (28 Stat. 279; 6 U.S.C. 6-13). The bond shall be for the same period covered by the license. No licensee may trade without a bond. Except as provided in paragraph (d) of this section, no surety may be released from liability until the license expires.
( b ) The bond shall be in favor of the United States for the benefit of the United States and any customer of the licensee who recovers a judgment for damages resulting from violation of any law or regulation affecting or relating to reservation businesses. Any customer who recovers such a judgment may bring suit on the bond in his or her own name. The bond shall be conditioned on payment by the licensee of all judgments for damages resulting from violations of the regulations of this part.
( c ) Any surety for a reservation business on the Hopi or Zuni Reservation shall agree in writing to submit itself voluntarily to the jurisdiction of the tribal court for the purpose of adjudicating any claim arising under the bond.
( d ) Any surety on the bond of a licensed reservation business may be relieved from liabilities by complying with the provisions of § 141.57 of this title.
[40 FR 39837, Aug. 29, 1975, as amended at 41 FR 22937, June 8, 1976. Redesignated at 47 FR 13327, Mar. 30, 1982]
###### Editorial Note on Part 224

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 224 appear at 84 FR 69611, Dec. 18, 2019.

#### § 224.130 What is the purpose of this subpart?

This subpart describes how the Secretary and a Tribe will develop and perform the periodic review and evaluation required by the Act and by a TERA.
H. Res. 433

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

March 9, 2000.

Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule

XVIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee of the

Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of

the bill (H.R. 1695) to provide for the conveyance of certain

Federal public lands in the Ivanpah Valley, Nevada, to Clark

County, Nevada, for the development of an airport facility,

and for other purposes. The first reading of the bill shall be

dispensed with. All points of order against consideration of

the bill are waived. General debate shall be confined to the

bill and shall not exceed one hour equally divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of the

Committee on Resources. After general debate the bill shall

be considered for amendment under the five-minute rule. It

shall be in order to consider as an original bill for the purpose of amendment under the five-minute rule the amendment in the nature of a substitute recommended by the Committee on Resources now printed in the bill. The committee
2

•HRES 433 EH

amendment in the nature of a substitute shall be considered

as read. All points of order against the committee amendment in the nature of a substitute are waived. The amendment printed in the report of the Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution shall be considered as read and shall

not be subject to a demand for division of the question in the

House or in the Committee of the Whole. During consideration of the bill for amendment, the Chairman of the Committee of the Whole may accord priority in recognition on the

basis of whether the Member offering an amendment has

caused it to be printed in the portion of the Congressional

Record designated for that purpose in clause 8 of rule XVIII.

Amendments so printed shall be considered as read. The

Chairman of the Committee of the Whole may: (1) postpone

until a time during further consideration in the Committee of

the Whole a request for a recorded vote on any amendment;

and (2) reduce to five minutes the minimum time for electronic voting on any postponed question that follows another

electronic vote without intervening business, provided that the

minimum time for electronic voting on the first in any series

of questions shall be 15 minutes. At the conclusion of consideration of the bill for amendment the Committee shall rise

and report the bill to the House with such amendments as

may have been adopted. Any Member may demand a separate

vote in the House on any amendment adopted in the Com-
3

•HRES 433 EH

mittee of the Whole to the bill or to the committee amendment in the nature of a substitute. The previous question

shall be considered as ordered on the bill and amendments

thereto to final passage without intervening motion except

one motion to recommit with or without instructions.

Attest:

Clerk.
11/05/201 0 08:3 4 FA X 2024935U 2 FA A + DM S aOOI/OO G

Thoma s Newto n Boilin g Managin g Attorne y - Regulaiof y Affair s 713/324-560 6 thomas.bolling@coair.co m 

### DEPARTMEN T O F jHANSPOfilATIO N 

# Continenta l

Airline s S

' T O-nrT-i.'iTirit,'. ' •;fv n • I -•": ' P 12: 3 2 Octobers , 201 0 Lega l Oepanmen i HQSL G 160 0 Smit h Street Housto n T

X 7700 2 Te l 71 3 32 4 513 1 Fa x 71 3 32 4 S I 60 conHnental.co m VI A FEDERA L EXPRES S - 796 3 1120 986 1 Federal Aviatio n Administratio n . - , 80 0 Independenc e Avenue , S W Washington , D C 2059 1 Attention : Hearin g Docke t Clerk , AGC-43 0 Wilbu r Wriglit Building , Suite 2W100 0 ^ , ^ .^^. ^ Re : Continental AirlineS

j Inc
. - Reques t

fo r Hearin g Fina l Notic e o f

Propose dCivi l Penalt

y - FA A Cas e No
. 2009SW27019 3 Dea r Si r o r Madam : B y lette r date dSeptember

22 , 2010 , th e Federa

l Aviatio n Administratio n (FAA ) issue da Fina l Notic e o f

Propose dCivi l Penalt

y i n th e above-reference dcase . Pursuan t t o 4 9 U.S.C
. § 46301 , a s amended , an dth e FA A Rule s o f

Practic e in FAA Civi l Penalt y Action s a s se t

fort h in 1 4 C.F.R
. § 13.16 , Continental Airlines , Inc
. (Continental ) hereb y request s ahearin g i n th e above-reference dcase . I

n addition , Continental als o request s al l futur e communication s o n thi s cas e b e directe dto m

y attentio n a

t th e addres s provide dbelow , Thoma s Newto n Boilin g Managin g Attorney , Regulator y Affair s Continental Airlines , Inc
. 160 0 Smit h Street , 15t

h Floo r HQSLG Houston , TX 7700 2 Tel : (713 ) 324-560 6 Fax : (713 ) 324-516 1 Email : thomas.bojlii^gfrvijcoair.co m Thank you . Pleas e le t

m e kno w i f

you needadditional informatio n

Th(Mna s Newto r Managin g Attorney , Regulatory11/05/201 0 09:3 5 FA X 202493514 2 FA A - > DM S Igl002/00 e 

# Continenta l ^ 1 Octobe r 5,201 0 Airllne s wS i Pag e 2

, . cc : Ti mDuff , Esq
. l | Attorney , Safet y Enforcement

Branch Q Federal Aviatio n Administratio n aOffic e o f Regional Counse l r' ^ 260 1 Meacha mBoulevard [ i For t Worth , T X 7613 7 : j (VIA FEDERA L EXPRESS )
# C_2006178EN.01003101.xml

| 29.7.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 178/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.7.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 178/31

---

Judgement of the Court of First Instance of 31 May 2006 — Kuwait Petroleum (Nederland) BV v Commission of the European Communities

(Case T-354/99) (1)

1

(State aid - Commission notice on the de minimis rule for State aid - Increase in excise duties on fuel - Aid to service stations - Oil companies - Risk of cumulation of aid - Price management system clause - Principle of sound administration)

de minimis

(2006/C 178/56)

Language of the case: Dutch

Parties

Applicant: Kuwait Petroleum (Nederland) BV (represented by: P. Mathijsen, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented initially by G. Rozet and H. Speyart, and subsequently by G. Rozet and H. van Vliet, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Intervening party supporting the applicant: Kingdom of the Netherlands, (represented initially by M. Fierstra, and subsequently by H. Sevenster, acting as Agents)

Intervening party supporting the applicant:

Re:

Re

Application for partial annulment of Commission Decision 1999/705/EC of 20 July 1999 on the State aid implemented by the Netherlands for 633 Dutch service stations located near the German border (OJ 1999 L 280, p. 87)

Operative part of the judgement

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders the applicant to pay its own costs and those of the Commission; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the applicant to pay its own costs and those of the Commission;

| 3. | Orders the Kingdom of the Netherlands to pay its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Kingdom of the Netherlands to pay its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 102, 8.4.2000.

1

---
§ 33.7 Implementing procedures. ( a ) The Assistant Secretary—Indian Affairs shall: ( 1 ) Implement the transfer for Indian education functions from the jurisdiction of Agency Superintendents and Area Office Directors to the Director, Office of Indian Education Programs.
( 2 ) Modify existing descriptions of positions for Area Office Directors, Agency Superintendents, and all other personnel directly and substantially involved with the provisions of education services by the Bureau of Indian Affairs.
( b ) The Director, Office of Indian Education Programs shall: ( 1 ) For Area, Agency, and Bureau of Indian Affairs postsecondary institutional personnel: ( i ) Properly list the duties of each employee required to perform functions redelegated by the Director;
( ii ) Define the responsibilities for monitoring and evaluating education programs; and
( iii ) Exercise supervision of these employees.
( 2 ) Define responsibilities for employees providing technical and coordinating assistance for support services to the Director, Office of Indian Education Programs and his/her subordinates, including procurement, contracting, personnel, and other administrative support areas.
[44 FR 58103, Oct. 9, 1979. Redesignated at 47 FR 13327, Mar. 30, 1982, as amended at 49 FR 12702, Mar. 30, 1984]
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Nostalgia Family Brands, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K, for the period ended December 31, 2018, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, William P. McDermitt, Chief Executive Officer and President of Nostalgia Family Brands, Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and                   
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     |                                                                                                                                                     
| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





|Dated: February 11, 2020 | By: | */s/ William P. McDermitt*            | 
|------------------------ | --- | ------------------------------------- | 
|                         |     | William P. McDermitt                  | 
|                         |     | Chief Executive Officer and President |
IV

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 284

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives on baseball player

Tony Gwynn’s 3,000th career base hit.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 8, 1999

Mr. CUNNINGHAM (for himself, Mr. PACKARD, Mr. HUNTER, and Mr.

BILBRAY) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on Government Reform

RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives on

baseball player Tony Gwynn’s 3,000th career base hit.

Whereas on August 6, 1999, Anthony (‘‘Tony’’) Gwynn, of

the San Diego Padres major league baseball organization,

hit his 3,000th career base hit;

Whereas the last person in the National League to have

3,000 career base hits was Lou Brock, on August 13,

1979;

Whereas in the history of major league baseball, only 22

other players have 3,000 or more base hits in their careers, including such greats as Roberto Clemente, Rod

Carew, and Hank Aaron;

Whereas Tony Gwynn is considered to be one of the greatest

major league hitters of the modern era, and was pro-
2

•HRES 284 IH

claimed the ‘‘Greatest Hitter Since Ted Williams’’ by

Sports Illustrated;

Whereas Tony Gwynn has won eight batting titles, tied for

the National League record only with Honus Wagner,

and topped only by the American League legend Ty

Cobb;

Whereas throughout his career Tony Gwynn has consistently

conducted himself with dignity, modesty, and selflessness

that has been an inspiration to all Americans;

Whereas Tony Gwynn has also distinguished himself off the

baseball diamond as an active and valued member of the

San Diego community;

Whereas Tony Gwynn, along with his wife Alicia, continue

their award-winning philanthropic efforts, and are extremely active in supporting the Tony and Alicia Gwynn

Foundation, the Casa de Amparo, Police Athletic League,

New Haven Home, Neighborhood House, the Jackie Robinson Family YMCA, the Epilepsy Society of San Diego,

and many more organizations;

Whereas in 1998, Tony Gwynn led all Padres players in community appearances and joined seven-time American

League batting champion Rod Carew for a historic youth

batting clinic in Culiaca ́n, Mexico, in March 1998; and

Whereas Tony Gwynn was named the Individual of the Year

at the 1998 Equal Opportunity Awards Dinner, was the

1995 Branch Rickey Award winner, as well as the 1998

Padres nominee for Major League Baseball’s Roberto

Clemente Man of the Year Award: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives con2 gratulates and commends Tony Gwynn of the San Diego
3

•HRES 284 IH

1 Padres for his amazing accomplishments on and off the

2 baseball field, and thanks him for many years of unsur3 passed baseball excitement.

Æ
# C_2014092EN.01004201.xml

| 29.3.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 92/42 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.3.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 92/42

---

Corrigendum to Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the TFEU — Cases where the Commission raises no objections

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 50 of 21 February 2014
  )

Official Journal of the European Union C 50 of 21 February 2014

2014/C 92/15

On page 33, the text referring to the State Aid No SA.37803 is cancelled and replaced by the following:

‘Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the TFEU

Cases where the Commission raises no objections

(Text with EEA relevance, except for products falling under Annex I of the Treaty)

| Date of adoption of the decision | 16.12.2013 |
| --- | --- |
| Aid number | SA.37803 (2013/N) |
| Member State | Germany |
| Region | — | — |
| Title (and/or name of the beneficiary) | Baden-Württemberg Zuschuss für die Tierkörperbeseitigung von gefallenen Tieren |
| Legal basis | — | Tierische Nebenprodukte-Beseitigungsgesetz vom 25.1.2004 (BGBl. I S. 82) |

Date of adoption of the decision

16.12.2013

Aid number

SA.37803 (2013/N)

Member State

Germany

Region

—

—

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

Baden-Württemberg Zuschuss für die Tierkörperbeseitigung von gefallenen Tieren

Legal basis

—

Tierische Nebenprodukte-Beseitigungsgesetz vom 25.1.2004 (BGBl. I S. 82)

| — | Gesetz zur Ausführung des Tierische Nebenprodukte-Beseitigungsgesetzes vom 14.12.2004 (GBl. S. 914) |
| --- | --- |

—

Gesetz zur Ausführung des Tierische Nebenprodukte-Beseitigungsgesetzes vom 14.12.2004 (GBl. S. 914)

Type of measure

Scheme

—

Objective

Animal diseases

Form of aid

Subsidized services

Budget

| | Overall budget: EUR 60 (in millions) |
| --- | --- |

Overall budget: EUR 60 (in millions)

| | Annual budget: EUR 10 (in millions) |
| --- | --- |

Annual budget: EUR 10 (in millions)

Intensity

100 %

Duration (period)

01.01.2014 - 31.12.2019

Economic sectors

AGRICULTURE, FORESTRY AND FISHING

Name and address of the granting authority

Stadt- und Landkreise

Other information

—

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

http://ec.europa.eu/competition/elojade/isef/index.cfm’

---