alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.2**

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of OMI Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Kathleen C. Haines, Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

|   | 3)  | The Report fully complies with the requirements    of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                      |
|--------|----------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | 4)       | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,        in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations    of the Company. |

          

          

| **Date:** | **August 14, 2003** |   | **By:** | /s/ Kathleen C. Haines              |
|-----------|---------------------|--------|---------|-------------------------------------|
|      |                     |   |    |                                     |
|      |                |   |    | **Kathleen C. Haines**              |
|      |                |   |    | **Senior Vice President,**          |
|      |                |   |    | **Chief Financial Officer**         |
|      |                |   |    | **   and Treasurer** |

 

 

*A signed original of this statement required by Section 906 has been provided to OMI Corporation and will be retained by OMI Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its Staff upon request.*

****
§ 286.12 Content of application. Applications shall be on a form prescribed by the Assistant Secretary which shall at the minimum include: ( a ) Total capital requirement, including operating capital required until such time as the cash generated from operations will be sufficient to make the enterprise self-sustaining.
( b ) Amount of total financing required as well as what is obtainable from other sources, including the applicant's personal resources, and a statement of terms and conditions under which any borrowed portion is obtainable.
( c ) Capital deficiency, which will be the basis for the amount of grant requested.
( d ) Pro forma balance sheets and operating statements showing estimated expenses, income and net profit from operations for three years following receipt of the requested grant.
( e ) Annual operating statements and balance sheets, audited if available, for the prior two years or applicable years for enterprises already in operation.
( f ) Current financial statements, consisting of a balance sheet and operating statement.
( g ) A plan of operation which shall be acceptable to the lender making the loan and the Assistant Secretary.
### T E X A S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S , T H I R D D I S T R I C T , A T A U S T I N
NO. 03-16-00094- CV
Juan T orre s, Appellan t

v. Am eric an MortgageInvestm ent P artner s F und I Trust, Appellee

F ROM CO UNTY COURT AT LAW NO . 1 O F TRAVIS CO UNTY NO. C-1 -CV- 15- 0082 59, H ONO RAB LE ERIC SH EP P ERD, JUDGE P RESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O PI N I O N Appellant’s brief was due o n M ay 19, 2016. On J une 6, 2016, this Court notified appellant that his brief was ove rdue a nd that a fa ilure to respond by J une 16, 2016 would result i n t h e d i s m i s sal of this appea l for want of prosec ution. To date, appellant has not filed a brief or a motion for extension of time. Acc ording ly , we dismiss this appea l for want of prosec ution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b)
.

__________________________________________ Cindy Olson Bour land, J ustice Be fore Chief Justice Rose, Jus tices Goodwin a nd Bour land Dismissed for Want of Prosecution Filed: Jul y

6, 2016
________________________________________________________________________

Exhibit 10.4 
​
LICENSE AGREEMENT
AMENDMENT #8
​
 
WHEREAS, effective as of December 1, 2014, and as further amended, Miromatrix Medical Inc., a corporation organized under the laws of the State of Delaware and having an office 10399 West 70th Street, Eden Prairie, MN 55344 (“Miromatrix”) and Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research, a not for profit corporation with an address at 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905 (“Mayo”) executed a License Agreement (the “Agreement”) for Services as outlined in the Agreement.
 
WHEREAS, Miromatrix and Mayo wish to amend said Agreement.
 
NOW, THEREFORE, Miromatrix and Mayo agree as follows:
 
		1.	Miromatrix has agreed to provide additional funding of $75,608 for expansion to include more control animals for additional experiments.  Accordingly, the attached Exhibit B-5 shall amend Section 3 of the Agreement.

​
		2.	Except as specifically provided herein, the terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in force.

​
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Amendment which shall be effective as of the last dated signature below.
​
MIROMATRIX MEDICAL INC.MAYO FOUNDATION FOR MEDICAL
EDUCATION AND RESEARCH       
​
​
By: ​ ​/s/ Jeff Ross​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​By: ​ ​/s/ Randall S. Jones​ ​​ ​​ ​
Name: ​ ​Jeff Ross​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​Name: ​ ​Randall S. Jones​ ​​ ​​ ​
Title: ​ ​CEO​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​Title: ​ ​Operations Manager​ ​​ ​​ ​
Date: ​ ​7/5/2021​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​Date: ​ ​6/30/2021​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​
​
 
​



​
Budget – Exhibit B-5
​
<PAGE>



                                                                   Exhibit 99.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
            SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, as
chief financial officer of Iron Age Corporation (the "Company"), does hereby
certify that to the undersigned's knowledge:

     1)   the Company's 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section
          13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2)   the information contained in the Company's 10-Q fairly presents, in
          all material respects, the financial condition and results of
          operations of the Company.


                                 /s/ Bart R. Huchel
                                 ------------------------------
                                 Bart R. Huchel
                                 Chief Financial Officer, Vice President -
                                 Finance and Treasurer



Dated: June 10, 2003


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and forwarded to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### § 293.16 May a compact or amendment include provisions addressing the application of the Tribe's or the State's criminal and civil laws and regulations?

Yes. A compact or amendment may include provisions addressing the application of the criminal and civil laws and regulations of the Tribe or the State that are directly related to and necessary for the licensing and regulation of the gaming activity. At the request of the Secretary pursuant to § 293.8(e), the parties must show that these laws and regulations are both directly related to and necessary for the licensing and regulation of the gaming activity.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 296 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                    September 24, 1999.
    Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker 
may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule XVIII, declare the House resolved into the 
Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of the 
bill (H.R. 1487) to provide for public participation in the declaration of 
national monuments under the Act popularly known as the Antiquities Act of 1906. 
The first reading of the bill shall be dispensed with. General debate shall be 
confined to the bill and shall not exceed one hour equally divided and 
controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on 
Resources. It shall be in order to consider as an original bill for the purpose 
of amendment under the five-minute rule the amendment in the nature of a 
substitute recommended by the Committee on Resources now printed in the bill. 
The committee amendment in the nature of a substitute shall be considered as 
read. During consideration of the bill for amendment, the Chairman of the 
Committee of the Whole may accord priority in recognition on the basis of 
whether the Member offering an amendment has caused it to be printed in the 
portion of the Congressional Record designated for that purpose in clause 8 of 
rule XVIII. Amendments so printed shall be considered as read. The Chairman of 
the Committee of the Whole may: (1) postpone until a time during further 
consideration in the Committee of the Whole a request for a recorded vote on any 
amendment; and (2) reduce to five minutes the minimum time for electronic voting 
on any postponed question that follows another electronic vote without 
intervening business, provided that the minimum time for electronic voting on 
the first in any series of questions shall be 15 minutes. At the conclusion of 
consideration of the bill for amendment the Committee shall rise and report the 
bill to the House with such amendments as may have been adopted. Any Member may 
demand a separate vote in the House on any amendment adopted in the Committee of 
the Whole to the bill or to the committee amendment in the nature of a 
substitute. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill and 
amendments thereto to final passage without intervening motion except one motion 
to recommit with or without instructions.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
```

[115th Congress Public Law 74]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

[[Page 131 STAT. 1243]]

Public Law 115-74
115th Congress

                            Joint Resolution

 
  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
    United States Code, of the rule submitted by Bureau of Consumer 
             Financial Protection relating to ``Arbitration 
        Agreements''. <<NOTE: Nov. 1, 2017 -  [H.J. Res. 111]>> 

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress disapproves the 
rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating 
to ``Arbitration Agreements'' (82 Fed. Reg. 33210 (July 19, 2017)), and 
such rule shall have no force or effect.

    Approved November 1, 2017.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.J. Res. 111:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 163 (2017):
            July 25, considered and passed House.
            Oct. 24, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
Exhibit 13.2



CERTIFICATION OF RICHARD PILLINGER,
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER OF

BLUENRGY GROUP LIMITED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report
of BlueNRGY Group Limited (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the period ending June 30, 2017, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned hereby certifies that to the best of his
knowledge:



1. The Report fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2. The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: October 27, 2017



|By: | /s/ Richard Pillinger                                                              | 
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|    | Name: Richard PillingerTitle: Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer) |
VIO MEM To date, appellant has failed to respond to our order to show cause or to otherwise demonstrate that this court has jurisdiction to consider this appeal. Accordingly, it appears we lack jurisdiction, and we

ORDER this appeal DISMISSED.

GiblAns 

## #

4 1 Douglas , J.

cc: Hon. Brent T. Adams, District Judge Jill I. Greiner, Settlement Judge Tory M. Pankopf Gordon Silver/Reno Washoe District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA (0) 1947A 2
##### 



Exhibit 32.0
 CERTIFICATION
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
with Respect to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
for the Period Ended September 30, 2006
  1.
    
    The Companys quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2006, (the
Form 10-Q) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act); and
 2.
    
    Information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date: November 14, 2006
    
    /s/ Thomas S. WuThomas S. WuChairman, President andChief Executive OfficerDate: November 14, 2006
    
    /s/ Dennis WuDennis WuDirector, Executive Vice President andChief Financial Officer
IV

House Calendar No. 165

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 408

[Report No. 106–490]

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 1838) to assist in the

enhancement of the security of Taiwan, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 31, 2000

Mr. DIAZ-BALART, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be

printed

RESOLUTION

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 1838) to assist

in the enhancement of the security of Taiwan, and for

other purposes.

1 Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution

2 it shall be in order without intervention of any point of

3 order to consider in the House the bill (H.R. 1838) to

4 assist in the enhancement of the security of Taiwan, and

5 for other purposes. The bill shall be considered as read

6 for amendment. The amendment recommended by the

7 Committee on International Relations now printed in the
2

HRES 408 RH

1 bill shall be considered as adopted. The previous question

2 shall be considered as ordered on the bill, as amended,

3 and on any further amendment thereto to final passage

4 without intervening motion except: (1) one hour of debate

5 on the bill, as amended, equally divided and controlled by

6 the chairman and ranking minority member of the Com7 mittee on International Relations; (2) an amendment

8 printed in the Congressional Record pursuant to clause

9 8 of rule XVIII, if offered by the Minority Leader or a

10 designee, which shall be considered as read and shall be

11 separately debatable for one hour equally divided and con12 trolled by the proponent and an opponent; and (3) one

13 motion to recommit with or without instructions.

House Calendar No. 165

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 408

[Report No. 106–490]

RESOLUTION

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 1838)

to assist in the enhancement of the security ofTaiwan, and for other purposes.

JANUARY 31, 2000

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be

printed
February 28, 2014



|To: | UBS Commercial Mortgage Securitization Corporation., as Depositor                                         
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    | Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as Trustee, Certificate Administrator and Paying Agent and Custodian
|    | Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer                                                



2013 Annual Statement
of Servicer Compliance (Item 1123)
Name of Mortgage Loan Pass-Through Certificate Series:

·UBS 2012-C1



(Referred to herein as “Security Agreement” or “Security
Agreements”)



The undersigned, a duly authorized officer
of Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, as special servicer (the “Special Servicer”) herein certifies to the following:



| | 1. | All servicing activities and performance of such servicing activities under each of the Security Agreements are performed on
behalf of the Special Servicer.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | A review of the servicing activities and performance by the Special Servicer for the period of August 30, 2013 to December
31, 2013 (the “Reporting Period”) in accordance with the servicing agreements applicable to each Security Agreement has been conducted under my supervision.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 3. | To the best of my knowledge, the Special Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the terms of the Security Agreements, in all
material respects for the Reporting Period and if there has been a failure to fulfill any such obligations
in any material respect, each failure and the nature and status thereof has been specifically identified herewith.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|Certified by: | /s/ Thekla Salzman           |  | Date: February 28, 2014
|------------- | ---------------------------- |  | -----------------------
|              | Thekla Salzman               |  |                        
|              | Chief Administrative Officer |  |
### §8679. Construction of vessels in foreign shipyards: prohibition

(a) Prohibition.—Except as provided in subsection (b), no vessel to be constructed for any of the armed forces, and no major component of the hull or superstructure of any such vessel, may be constructed in a foreign shipyard.

(b) Presidential Waiver for National Security Interest.—(1) The President may authorize exceptions to the prohibition in subsection (a) when the President determines that it is in the national security interest of the United States to do so.

(2) The President shall transmit notice to Congress of any such determination, and no contract may be made pursuant to the exception authorized until the end of the 30-day period beginning on the date on which the notice of the determination is received by Congress.

(c) Exception for Inflatable Boats.—An inflatable boat or a rigid inflatable boat, as defined by the Secretary of the Navy, is not a vessel for the purpose of the restriction in subsection (a).

(Added Pub. L. 103–160, div. A, title VIII, §824(b), Nov. 30, 1993, 107 Stat. 1710, §7309; renumbered §8679, Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, §807(d)(2), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1836.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–232 renumbered section 7309 of this title as this section.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2018 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 115–232 effective Feb. 1, 2019, with provision for the coordination of amendments and special rule for certain redesignations, see section 800 of Pub. L. 115–232, set out as a note preceding section 3001 of this title.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Delegation of Authority

For delegation of authority of President under subsec. (b) of this section, see section 3 of Ex. Ord. No. 12765, June 11, 1991, 56 F.R. 27401, set out as a note under section 113 of this title.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

YAN QIU ZHAO,

Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

Appellee.

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-19-00312-CR

Appeal from the

County Court

of Andrews County, Texas

(TC# 19-0145)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was no error in the 

judgment. We therefore affirm the judgment of the court below. This decision shall be certified 

below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 9TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2021.

JEFF ALLEY, Justice

Before Rodriguez, C.J., Palafox, and Alley, JJ.
#### § 293.24 May a compact or amendment include provisions addressing rights of employees?

Yes. Notwithstanding § 293.23(c)(8), a compact or amendment may include provisions or procedures addressing the organizational and representational rights of employees, including service or hospitality workers, where such provisions or procedures are “directly related” to the operation of gaming activities as articulated by the Ninth Circuit in *Chicken Ranch Rancheria of Me-Wuk Indians* v. *California,* 42 F.4th 1024, 1035-1040 & n.2 (citing *Coyote Valley Band of Pomo Indians* v. *California (In re Indian Gaming Related Cases Chemehuevi Indian Tribe),* 331 F.3d 1094, 1116 (9th Cir. 2003)).
MIDLAND CAPITAL HOLDINGS CORPORATION

                                   EXHIBIT 99

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection  whit the  quarterly  report  of  Midland  Capital  Holdings
Corporation  (the  "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending December 31,
2002 as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof
(the  "Report"),  I Paul Zogas,  President  and Chief  Executive  and  Financial
Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          (1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a)
               or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all
               material  respects,   the  financial  condition  and  results  of
               operations of the Company.




Date:  February 14, 2003    BY: /s/ Paul Zogas
                                -------------------------------------
                                Paul Zogas
                                President, Chief Executive and Financial Officer
###### Editorial Note on Part 224

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 224 appear at 84 FR 69611, Dec. 18, 2019.

#### § 224.77 Who may appeal the Secretary's decision on a final proposed TERA or a revised final proposed TERA?

Only a Tribe applying for a TERA may appeal the Secretary's decision to disapprove a final proposed TERA or a revised final proposed TERA in accordance with the appeal procedures contained in subpart I of this part. No other person or entity may appeal the Secretary's decision. The Secretary's decision to approve a final proposed TERA or a revised final proposed TERA is a final agency action.
§ 171.125 Can I appeal BIA decisions? ( a ) You may appeal our decisions in accordance with procedures set out in 25 CFR part 2, unless otherwise prohibited by law.
( b ) If you appeal an irrigation bill, you must pay the bill in accordance with subpart E before we will provide irrigation service to you. If you prevail on appeal, any overpayment will be refunded to you.