alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
MEMORANDUM

DATE: 01/22/2015

FROM: Laura Farris/EPA Region 8

TO: Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants; Docket Id: OAR–2013-0602

SUBJECT: Center for the New Energy Economy’s Western States Meeting on 01/22/2015

SUMMARY: 

Callie Videtich, EPA Region 8 Acting Assistant Regional Administrator, attended the Center for the New 

Energy Economy’s Western States Meeting on 01/22/2015 to discuss the Clean Power Plan. The meeting 

was held in in Phoenix, Arizona. The Clean Power Plan was proposed on June 2, 2014. 

ATTENDEES:

EPA

Callie Videtich, EPA Region 8, Acting Assistant Regional Administrator

Colleen McKaughan, EPA Region 9

Kate Kelly, EPA Region 10

External Stakeholders

First Name Last Name Company

Henry Darwin Arizona

Eric Massey Arizona

Steve Burr Arizona

Tracy Terry Bipartisan Policy Center

Kristen Driskell California Energy Commission

Tung Le CARB

Dennis Arfmann Center for the New Energy Economy

Patrick Cummins Center for the New Energy Economy

Jeff Lyng Center for the New Energy Economy

Tom Plant Center for the New Energy Economy

Bill Ritter Center for the New Energy Economy

Will Allison Colorado

Martha Rudolph Colorado

Jeff Burks Energy Strategies

Rick Sprott Energy Strategies

Gibson Peters Energy Strategies

Scott Pugrud Idaho

Tim Baker Montana

Eugenia Quintana Navajo Nation

Raju Bisht Navajo Nation

April Quinn Navajo Nation

Colleen Cripps Nevada

Dave Emme Nevada

Cindy Hollenberg New Mexico

Anne Jakle New Mexico

Terry O'Clair North Dakota

Elizabeth Osborne NW Power and Conservation Council
First Name Last Name Company

Colin McConnaha Oregon

Jessica Shipley Oregon Department of Energy

John Larsen Rhodium Group

Brian Gustafson South Dakota

Glade Sowards Utah Division of Air Quality

Bill Drumheller Washington

Vijay Satyal WECC

Jeff Gabler WESTAR

Dan Johnson WESTAR

Tom Carr Western Interstate Energy Board

Alaine Ginocchio Western Interstate Energy Board

Steve Dietrich Wyoming

Todd Parfitt Wyoming
### §1436a. Coverage paid up at 30 years and age 70

Effective October 1, 2008, a reduction under this subchapter in the retired or retainer pay of a person electing an annuity under this subchapter may not be made for any month after the later of—

(1) the month that is the 360th month for which that person's retired or retainer pay is reduced pursuant to such an election; and

(2) the month during which that person attains 70 years of age.

(Added Pub. L. 106–65, div. A, title VI, §655(a), Oct. 5, 1999, 113 Stat. 667.)
EPA Reg. No. 62097-12

Vol. 1 – part 2
EXHIBIT 31.1


Certification of Chief Executive Officer


Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


I, Scott D. Wollney, certify that:





1I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the annual report on Form 10-K/A of Atlas Financial Holdings, Inc.; and





2Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.








Date: March 21, 2017





/s/ Scott D. WollneyScott D. WollneyPresident and Chief Executive Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 430 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 430

    Commending the paralegals of the United States and supporting a 
                        National Paralegals Day.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 1, 2000

Mr. Frost submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
    Commending the paralegals of the United States and supporting a 
                        National Paralegals Day.

Whereas the paralegals of the United States strive to foster high standards of 
        conduct, professional ethics, and responsibility through continuing 
        legal education cooperation with State bar associations;
Whereas paralegals are diversely employed by law firms, public and private 
        corporations, businesses, institutions, and local, State, and National 
        Government agencies;
Whereas paralegals are committed to achieving more economical and improved legal 
        services throughout the United States by focusing on benefits to the 
        paralegal profession through developing opportunities, incentives, and 
        recognition for legal education;
Whereas paralegals work under the direction of an attorney and require 
        sufficient knowledge of legal concepts to perform specifically delegated 
        legal work that would otherwise be performed by the attorney; and
Whereas the paralegals of the United States are tremendous assets to their 
        communities and contribute substantially to the quality and proficiency 
        of legal services throughout the Nation: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That--
            (1) the House of Representatives commends the paralegals of 
        the United States for their outstanding work and for improving 
        legal services for the people of the United States; and
            (2) a National Paralegal Day should be established to 
        recognize the contributions of paralegals throughout the United 
        States.
                                 <all>
```
§ 166.224 What factors does the BIA consider when reviewing a leasehold mortgage? ( a ) We will approve the leasehold mortgage if: ( 1 ) All consents required in the permit have been obtained from the Indian landowners and any surety or guarantor;
( 2 ) The mortgage covers only the permit interest, and no unrelated collateral belonging to the permittee;
( 3 ) The financing being obtained will be used only in connection with the development or use of the permitted premises, and the mortgage does not secure any unrelated obligations owed by the permittee to the mortgagee; and
( 4 ) We find no compelling reason to withhold our approval, in order to protect the best interests of the Indian landowner.
( b ) In making the finding required by paragraph (a)(4) of this section, we will consider whether: ( 1 ) The ability to perform the permit obligations would be adversely affected by the cumulative mortgage obligations;
( 2 ) Any negotiated permit provisions as to the allocation or control of insurance or condemnation proceeds would be modified;
( 3 ) The remedies available to us or the Indian landowners would be limited (beyond the additional notice and cure rights to be afforded to the mortgagee), if the permittee defaults on the permit;
( 4 ) Any rights of the Indian landowners would be subordinated or adversely affected in the event of a foreclosure, assignment in lieu of foreclosure, or issuance of a “new permit” to the mortgagee.
( c ) We will notify the Indian landowners of our approval of the leasehold mortgage.
IV

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 399

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives with respect to violence

within our schools and the initiatives within States and localities to

address this epidemic.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

NOVEMBER 18, 1999

Mr. TANCREDO (for himself, Mr. COBURN, Mr. MCINTOSH, Mr. GRAHAM,

Mrs. CHENOWETH-HAGE, Mr. PITTS, Mr. MCINNIS, Mr. LARGENT, Mr.

HOEKSTRA, and Mr. DOOLITTLE) submitted the following resolution;

which was referred to the Committee on Education and the Workforce

RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives with

respect to violence within our schools and the initiatives

within States and localities to address this epidemic.

Whereas the United States has been plagued by an outbreak

of violence within our schools over the course of the past

year;

Whereas violent and disruptive behavior within our schools is

a deterrent to the learning process and detracts from

education in general;

Whereas classrooms must remain some of the safest places

for our Nation’s young people and should be a place of

learning and opening exchange of ideas, not a harbinger

of fear and apprehension;
2

HRES 399 IH

Whereas recent events in Decatur, Illinois have once again

showcased the extent to which our school communities

are impacted by juvenile violence; and

Whereas the House of Representatives has sought initiatives

and taken steps to combat the spread of youth violence

within our schools: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Rep2 resentatives that the Congress—

3 (1) commends States and localities, and in par4 ticular the Decatur School Board, in efforts to com5 bat school-based violence, including qualified zero6 tolerance policies for violent actions; and

7 (2) urges continued diligence in efforts to create

8 a safe learning environment for our Nation’s youth.

Æ
|    |                                                                                                                       |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |

|    |                                                                                                                                                                  |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of HealthSouth Corporation. |

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |  |  |  |
| Date:  | October 28, 2014 |   |   |   |
|   |   | By: | /s/ JAY GRINNEY |   |
|   |   |   | Jay Grinney |   |
|   |   |   | President and Chief Executive Officer |   |
|   |   |   |   |   |
#### John Wagner, Appellant, v. Anna J. Doyle, as Administratrix de Bonis Non, etc., of Charles Kinken, Deceased, Respondent.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Jenks, Hooker, Gaynor, Rich and Miller, JJ., concurred.
### §9064. Air Force nurses: Chief; appointment

(a) Position of Chief.—There is a Chief of the Air Force Nurse Corps.

(b) Chief.—The Secretary of the Air Force shall appoint the Chief from the officers of the Regular Air Force designated as Air Force nurses whose regular grade is above lieutenant colonel and who are recommended by the Surgeon General. The Chief serves during the pleasure of the Secretary.

(Added Pub. L. 104–201, div. A, title V, §502(b), Sept. 23, 1996, 110 Stat. 2511, §8069; amended Pub. L. 105–261, div. A, title V, §505, Oct. 17, 1998, 112 Stat. 2004; Pub. L. 107–314, div. A, title V, §504(a)(3), Dec. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 2531; Pub. L. 114–328, div. A, title V, §502(nn)(1), (2), Dec. 23, 2016, 130 Stat. 2106; renumbered §9069, Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, §806(c), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1833; renumbered §9064 and amended Pub. L. 116–92, div. A, title IX, §952(b)(1), title XVII, §1731(a)(61), Dec. 20, 2019, 133 Stat. 1561, 1815.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2019—Pub. L. 116–92, §952(b)(1), renumbered section 9069 of this title as this section.

Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 116–92, §1731(a)(61), substituted "is" for "are". Amendment was directed to section 9069 of this title and was executed before amendment by section 952(b)(1) of Pub. L. 116–92, see above, pursuant to section 1731(f) of Pub. L. 116–92, set out as a Coordination of Certain Sections of an Act With Other Provisions of That Act note under section 101 of this title.

2018—Pub. L. 115–232 renumbered section 8069 of this title as section 9069 of this title.

2016—Pub. L. 114–328, §502(nn)(2), amended section catchline generally, substituting "Air Force nurses: Chief; appointment" for "Air Force nurses: Chief and assistant chief; appointment; grade".

Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 114–328, §502(nn)(1)(A), substituted "Position of Chief" for "Positions of Chief and Assistant Chief" in heading and struck out "and assistant chief" after "There are a Chief" in text.

Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 114–328, §502(nn)(1)(B), struck out second sentence which read as follows: "An appointee who holds a lower regular grade shall be appointed in the regular grade of major general."

Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 114–328, §502(nn)(1)(C), struck out subsec. (c). Text read as follows: "The Surgeon General shall appoint the assistant chief from the officers of the Regular Air Force designated as Air Force nurses whose regular grade is above lieutenant colonel."

2002—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 107–314 substituted "major general" for "brigadier general" in second sentence.

1998—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 105–261 struck out ", but not for more than three years, and may not be reappointed to the same position" after "pleasure of the Secretary".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2018 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 115–232 effective Feb. 1, 2019, with provision for the coordination of amendments and special rule for certain redesignations, see section 800 of Pub. L. 115–232, set out as a note preceding section 3001 of this title.
§ 170.137 How does the TTP Coordinating Committee conduct business? The Committee holds at least two meetings a year. In order to maximize participation by the Tribal public, the Committee shall submit to the Secretary its proposed meeting dates and locations for each fiscal year no later than October 1st. Subject to approval by the Secretary, additional Committee meetings may be called with the consent of one-third of the Committee members, or by BIA or FHWA. The Committee conducts business at its meetings as follows: ( a ) A quorum consists of representation from eight BIA Regions.
( b ) The Committee will operate by consensus or majority vote, as determined by the Committee in its protocols.
( c ) Any Committee member can submit an agenda item to the Chair.
( d ) The Committee will work through a committee-approved annual work plan and budget.
( e ) Annually, the Committee must elect from among the Committee membership a Chair, a Vice-Chair, and other officers. These officers will be responsible for preparing for and conducting Committee meetings and summarizing meeting results. These officers will also have other duties that the Committee may prescribe.
( f ) The Committee must keep the Secretary and the Tribes informed through an annual accomplishment report provided within 90 days after the end of each fiscal year.
( g ) The Committee's budget will be funded through the TTP management and oversight funds, not to exceed $150,000 annually.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS

ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Global Crossing Limited (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2008 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the report), I, John J. Legere, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                      
|--------------------------------------
|Date: August 5, 2008                  
|                                      
|/S/ JOHN J. LEGERE                    
|John J. Legere Chief Executive Officer
### §8261. Presentation of United States flag upon retirement

(a) Presentation of Flag.—Upon the release of a member of the Navy or Marine Corps from active duty for retirement or transfer to the Fleet Reserve or the Fleet Marine Corps Reserve, the Secretary of the Navy shall present a United States flag to the member.

(b) Multiple Presentations Not Authorized.—A member is not eligible for a presentation of a flag under subsection (a) if the member has previously been presented a flag under this section or any other provision of law providing for the presentation of a United States flag incident to release from active service for retirement.

(c) No Cost to Recipient.—The presentation of a flag under this section shall be at no cost to the recipient.

(Added Pub. L. 105–261, div. A, title VI, §644(b)(1), Oct. 17, 1998, 112 Stat. 2048, §6141; amended Pub. L. 106–65, div. A, title VI, §652(e), Oct. 5, 1999, 113 Stat. 666; renumbered §8261, Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, §807(b)(10), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1835.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 8261, acts Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 505; Oct. 4, 1961, Pub. L. 87–378, §4, 75 Stat. 808, related to enlistment in Air National Guard of United States, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 103–337, div. A, title XVI, §1662(b)(3), Oct. 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 2990. See section 12107 of this title.

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–232 renumbered section 6141 of this title as this section.

1999—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 106–65 substituted "under this section or any other provision of law providing for the presentation of a United States flag incident to release from active service for retirement." for "under this section or section 3681 or 8681 of this title or section 516 of title 14."

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2018 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 115–232 effective Feb. 1, 2019, with provision for the coordination of amendments and special rule for certain redesignations, see section 800 of Pub. L. 115–232, set out as a note preceding section 3001 of this title.

#### Effective Date

Section applicable with respect to releases from active duty described in this section, sections 7251 and 9251 of this title, and section 2748 of Title 14, Coast Guard, on or after Oct. 1, 1998, see section 644(e) of Pub. L. 105–261, set out as a note under section 7251 of this title.
§ 168.12 Special permit requirements and provisions. All grazing permits shall contain the following provisions: ( a ) Because the lands covered by the permit are in trust status, all of the permittees' obligations on the permit and the obligations of his sureties are to the United States as well as to the beneficial owners of the lands.
( b ) The permittee agrees he will not use, cause, or allow to be used any part of the permitted area for any unlawful conduct or purpose.
( c ) The permit authorizes only the grazing of livestock.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 13**  **- 2284** 

CATHERINE GIERBOLINI , Plaintiff

– Appellant ,
v. SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION , Defendant

- Appellee
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Alexandria
. Leonie M. Brinkema , District Judge. ( 1:12

- cv - 01459

- LMB

- IDD )

Submitted : December 19, 2013 Decided: December 23, 2013

Before SHEDD, DAVIS, and FLOYD , C ircuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion
. Catherine Gierbolini, Appellant Pro Se. Edward Lee Isler, Lori Hunt Turner, ISLER, DARE, RAY, RADCLIFFE & CONNOLLY, PC, Vienna, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Catherine Gierbolini appeals the district court ’ s order granting summary judgment for Science Applications International Corporation (“Science Applications”) as to Gierbolini’s defamation claim. We have reviewed th e record and find no reversible error. * Contrary to Gierbolini’s assertions on appeal, Science Applications’ alleged refusal to respond to requests for employment verification cannot form the basis of a n actionable defamation claim
. See, e.g. , Tharpe v. Saunders , 737 S.E.2d 890, 892 (Va. 2013) (“The elements of defamation are (1) publication of (2) an actionable statement with (3) the requisite intent.” (inte rn al quotation marks omitted)); Hyland v. Raytheon Tech. Servs. Co. , 670 S.E.2d 746, 750 (Va. 2009 ) (“Generally, under our common law, a private individual asserting a claim of defamation first must show that a defendant has published a false factual statement that concerns and harms the plaintiff or the plaintiff’s reputation
. ”). Accordingly, we affi rm substantially for the reasons stated by the district
court. Gierbolini v. Sci
. Applications Int’l Corp. , No. 1:12

- cv - 01459

- LMB

- IDD (E.D. Va. filed Oct. 8, 2013 & entered

* Many of the arguments addressed in Gierbolini’s informal brief were not fairly raised in the district court. We decline to address these issues in the first instance. See United States v. Edwards , 666 F.3d 877, 887 (4th Cir. 2011) (declining to address argument s raised for first time on appeal).3 Oct. 9, 2013) . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.

AFFIRMED
---

CONSENT OF RUSS WHITE

I hereby consent to the inclusion in this Annual Report on Form
10-K, which is being filed with the United States Securities and Exchange
Commission, of references to my name and to the use of the technical report
titled NI 43-101 Preliminary Economic Assessment, Ambler Project, Kobuk, AK
dated effective February 1, 2012 (the Technical Report).

I also consent to the incorporation by reference in NovaCopper
Inc.s Registration Statement (No. 333-185127) on Form S-3 and Registration
Statement (No. 333-181020) on Form S-8, of references to my name and to the use
of the Technical Report, which is included in the Annual Report on Form
10-K.

|DATED: February
      12, 2013 | 
|------------------------------ | 
|                               | 
|                               | 
|/s/ Russ White                 | 
|Name: Russ White               | 

---
#### Oppenheim *v.*Nagle.

[No. 11,992.

Filed December 9, 1924.]

From Marshall Circuit Court; *Reuben R. Carr,*Judge.

Action between Nathan Oppenheim and Franklin Nagle. From a judgment rendered, the former appeals.

*Affirmed.*

*Martindale & Martindale,*for appellant.

S. *N. Stevens*and *Holmes, Bemetha & Miller,*for appellee.

Per Curiam.

Judgment affirmed.