alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 11.1000 Complaint. A complaint must be filed by a law enforcement officer or by the presenting officer and sworn to by a person who has knowledge of the facts alleged. The complaint shall be signed by the complaining witness, and shall contain: ( a ) A citation to the specific section(s) of this part which gives the children's court jurisdiction of the proceedings;
( b ) A citation to the section(s) of this part which the minor is alleged to have violated;
( c ) The name, age, and address of the minor who is the subject of the complaint, if known; and
( d ) A plain and concise statement of the facts upon which the allegations are based, including the date, time, and location at which the alleged facts occurred.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

RONDA WEST, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D 

### 16-5426 ) U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, ) as trustee for the Certificateholders of ) Bear Stearns Asset-Backed Securities I ) Trust 2004-AC6, Asset-Backed Certificates, ) Series 2003-AC6, ) ) Appellee. ) ) Opinion filed February 7, 2018. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Sarasota County; Charles Williams, Judge. C. Ryan Violette of Moran, Sanchy & Associates, Sarasota, for Appellant. Michael D. Starks of Greenberg Traurig, P.A., Orlando; and Patrick G. Broderick of Greenberg Traurig, P.A., West Palm Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

VILLANTI, KHOUZAM, and BADALAMENTI, JJ., Concur.
#### Alice Lennon, as Administratrix, etc., of John F. Lennon, Deceased, Respondent, v. John Weser, Appellant.

Judgment and order unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Woodward, Jenlts, Gaynor, Rich.and Miller, JJ.
----

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 11 July 2006 — Torres v OHIM — Bodegas Muga (Torre Muga)

(Case T-247/03) (1)

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for figurative Community trade mark Torre Muga - Earlier national and international word marks TORRES - Likelihood of confusion - Breach of the rights of the defence)

(2006/C 224/74)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Miguel Torres (Vilafranca del Penedés, Spain) (represented by: E. Armijo Chávarri, M.A. Baz de San Ceferino and A. Castán Pérez-Gómez, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: I. de Medrano Caballero and S. Laitinen, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the Court of First Instance: Bodegas Muga, SA (Haro, Spain) (represented by: L.M. Polo Flores and F. Porcuna de la Rosa, lawyers)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 7 April 2003 (Case R 998/2001-1) concerning opposition proceedings between Miguel Torres, SA, and Bodegas Muga, SA

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

----

(1)OJ C 213, 6.9.2003.

----
Order entered April 22, 2016

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-16-00435-CV

IN RE JOE TRAMPAS BENAVIDES, Relator

Original Proceeding from the 363rd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F-9921709

ORDER

Before Chief Justice Wright, Justice Lang, and Justice Brown

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS the petition for writ of 

mandamus. We ORDER relator to bear the costs, if any, of this original proceeding. 

/s/ DOUGLAS S. LANG 

JUSTICE
## I N T H E C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S O F T E X A S NO. WR-84,593-01

EX P ARTE CHARLES WAYNE WARDEN, Appli cant
ON AP P LICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORP US CAUSE NO. 07-CR- 2122-B IN THE 138T H DISTRICT COURT

F ROM CAM ERON COUNTY

Per curiam . O R D E R Pursuant to the provisi o n s o f Ar t icle 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedur e, the cler k of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habea s corpus. Ex parte Y oung , 4 1 8 S
. W
. 2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of one count of

m urd er an d one count of ag g rava ted assault, and sentenc ed to six ty -five and fiftee n year s’ imprisonment, respe ctively

. The Thirteenth Court of Appea ls aff irmed his convictions. W arden v. State , No. 13-09-00116- CR (Tex. App.— Corpus Christi–Edinburg Sept. 16, 2010)(not designated for publication). Applicant conte nds that his tria l a nd appellate counsel rende red ine ffe ctive assistanc e. On Marc h 22, 2017, we d enied this application based on the trial court’s finding s afte r a hearing.2

Subsequently , Applicant filed a reque st to rec onsider, on our own motion, our ruling and reque sted, among other things, time to file objections to th e t ri al court’s finding s and time for this Court to revie w all of the exhibi ts; spec ifically , State’s Ex hibit 29. There fore , we rec onsidered the orig inal dispositi on, and held this application, allowing the Court time to re view the c omplete re cord. On May 18, 2018, this Court rec eived State’s Ex hibit 29. After revie wing the entire rec ord, including State’s Ex hibit 29, we are not persuad ed t h at Applicant is entitled to relief , nor do we conclude that the exhibi t contra dicts any of the habea s court’s finding s of fac t. There fore , we g rant Applicant’s motion, rec onsider the orig inal dispositi on, and deny this application, based on the trial court’s f indings, a fter a

hearing.

Filed: June 20, 2018 Do not publish
# C_2014152EN.01002801.xml

| 20.5.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 152/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.5.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 152/28

---

Commission notice pursuant to Article 16(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community

Modification of public service obligations in respect of scheduled air services

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2014/C 152/11)

| Member State | Sweden |
| --- | --- |
| Route concerned | Vilhelmina – Stockholm/Arlanda |
| Original date of entry into force of the public service obligations | 20 December 2001 |
| Date of entry into force of modifications | 25 October 2015 |
| Address where the text and any relevant information and/or documentation relating to the public service obligation can be obtained | For further information please contact:





  The Swedish Transport Administration |
| SE-781 87 Borlänge |
| SVERIGE |
| Tel. +46 771921921 |
| Internet: www.trafikverket.se |

Member State

Sweden

Route concerned

Vilhelmina – Stockholm/Arlanda

Original date of entry into force of the public service obligations

20 December 2001

Date of entry into force of modifications

25 October 2015

Address where the text and any relevant information and/or documentation relating to the public service obligation can be obtained

For further information please contact:

The Swedish Transport Administration

SE-781 87 Borlänge

SVERIGE

Tel. +46 771921921

Internet: www.trafikverket.se

---
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsLow-Speed Stability and Control Test of a "Double-Bubble" Transport ConfigurationA test in the Langley 12-Foot Low-Speed Tunnel was conducted as a risk mitigation effort to quickly obtain some low-speed stability and control data on a "double-bubble" or D8 transport configuration. The test also tested some configuration design trades. A 5-percent scale model was tested with stabilizer, elevator, rudder and aileron control deflections. This report summarizes the test results.Document ID20180000697Acquisition SourceLangley Research CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsVicroy, Dan D.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Date AcquiredJanuary 25, 2018Publication DateDecember 1, 2017Subject CategoryAircraft Stability And ControlReport/Patent NumberL-20897NF1676L-29029NASA/TM-2017-219797Funding Number(s)WBS: WBS 107210.02.02.07Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType20180000697.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
§ 162.024 May BIA take emergency action if Indian land is threatened? ( a ) We may take appropriate emergency action if there is a natural disaster or if an individual or entity causes or threatens to cause immediate and significant harm to Indian land. Emergency action may include judicial action seeking immediate cessation of the activity resulting in or threatening the harm.
( b ) We will make reasonable efforts to notify the individual Indian landowners before and after taking emergency action. In all cases, we will notify the Indian landowners after taking emergency action by actual or constructive notice. We will provide written notification of our action to the Indian tribe exercising jurisdiction over the Indian land before and after taking emergency action.
#### § 247.6 What will happen if I damage Government-owned property?

If you commit any act of vandalism, depredation, destruction, theft, or misuse of the land, buildings, fences, signs, or other structures that are the property of the United States you will be subject to prosecution under applicable Federal or State law.
# C_2006154EN.01002902.xml

| 1.7.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 154/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.7.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 154/29

---

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 18 May 2006 — Eerola v Commission

(Case F -110/05) (1)

1

(2006/C 154/67)

Language of the case: French

Language of the case: French

The President of the First Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 48, 25.2.2006.

1

---
BEFORE THE 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

Agreements Adopted by the Traffic 

Conferences of the International Air 

Transport Association 

OST-2011-^/X-^ 

APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL OF AGREEIVIENTS 

BY THE 

INTERNATIONAL AIR TRANSPORT ASSOCIATION 

lATA AGREEMENT APPROVED & IMMUNIZED 

DOCKETOST- / / - OZ ^ ^ ACTION DATE /4 » . ^tP ^ ^1 

This approval and grant of antitrust immunity is subject, where applicable, 

to cond tions previously imposed. 

This action i* effective after 7 days unless a petition is filed under 

14 CFR 385.30 or a review is undertaken on the Department's own motion. 

In view of the agreement's noncontroversial nature and the availability of 

the above proc^r ^ the 21-d3y B?riodjH;^><;ER 303.42 is waived. 

30 November 2011 

Communications with respect to 

this document should be sent to 

Douglas E. Lavin 

Regional Vice President - North America 

International Air Transport Association 

1776 K.St. N.W. #12"^ Floor 

Washington DC 20006 
Summary DOCKET: OST-2011-XXXX US DOT ORDER: pending 

Date: 30 November 2011 

Filing fee / lATA Acct: USD 61 / 0000-28 

US/UST involved: No 

End of Government Filing Period: 30 November 2011 

Intended effective date: 15 December 2011 

Agreement: Mail Vote 695 

TC3 Special Passenger Amending Resolution 01 On 

Special Passenger Amending Resolution between 

China (excluding Hong Kong SAR and Macao SAR) and Japan 

Intended Effective Date: 15 December 2011 

(Memo 1440) 

r1 01 On
#### § 500.140 Employment.

No qualified handicapped person shall, on the basis of handicap, be subjected to discrimination in employment under any program or activity conducted by the agency. The definitions, requirements, and procedures of section 501 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 U.S.C. 791), as established by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission in 29 CFR part 1613, shall apply to employment in federally conducted programs or activities.
San Luis Obispo County APCD 208-1 3/26/03

RULE 208. APPEALS 

 (Adopted 8/2/76; Revised 11/5/91, 9/23/98, and 3/26/03) 

A. Within thirty (30) days after notice by the Air Pollution Control Officer (APCO) of 

denial, suspension, or conditional approval of an Authority to Construct, Permit to 

Operate, or Permit to Sell or Rent, the applicant may petition the Hearing Board, in 

writing, for a public hearing. The Hearing Board, after notice and a public hearing held 

within thirty (30) days after filing the petition, may sustain or reverse the action of the 

APCO; such order may be made subject to specified conditions. 

B. Within thirty (30) days after any decision or action pertaining to the issuance of an 

Authority to Construct, Permit to Operate, or Permit to Sell or Rent, by the APCO, any 

aggrieved person who, in person or through a representative, appeared, submitted written 

testimony or otherwise participated in the action before the Air Pollution Control District 

may petition the Hearing Board in writing for a public hearing to determine if the 

Authority to Construct, Permit to Operate, or Permit to Sell or Rent was properly issued. 

The Hearing Board, after notice and a public hearing held in accordance with these Rules, 

and within thirty (30) days after the filing of the petition, shall render a decision on 

whether the Authority to Construct, Permit to Operate, or Permit to Sell or Rent was 

properly issued. In the Hearing Board's decision, the Hearing Board may approve, 

conditionally approve, or reverse the action or decision of the APCO pertaining to the 

issuance of an Authority to Construct, Permit to Operate, or Permit to Sell or Rent.
H. Res. 317

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

October 1, 1999.

Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall

be in order to consider the conference report to accompany

the bill (H.R. 1906) making appropriations for Agriculture,

Rural Development, Food and Drug Administration, and Related Agencies for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2000,

and for other purposes. All points of order against the conference report and against its consideration are waived. The

conference report shall be considered as read.

Attest:

Clerk.
### §10204. Personnel records

(a) The Secretary concerned shall maintain adequate and current personnel records of each member of the reserve components under the Secretary's jurisdiction showing the following with respect to the member:

(1) Physical condition.

(2) Dependency status.

(3) Military qualifications.

(4) Civilian occupational skills.

(5) Availability for service.

(6) Such other information as the Secretary concerned may prescribe.

(b) Under regulations to be prescribed by the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of each military department shall maintain a record of the number of members of each class of each reserve component who, during each fiscal year, have participated satisfactorily in active duty for training and inactive duty training with pay.

(Added Pub. L. 103–337, div. A, title XVI, §1661(a)(1), Oct. 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 2977.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

Provisions similar to those in this section were contained in section 275 of this title, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 103–337, §1661(a)(2)(A).

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Dec. 1, 1994, except as otherwise provided, see section 1691 of Pub. L. 103–337, set out as a note under section 10001 of this title.

#### Records of Service for Reserves

Pub. L. 116–92, div. A, title V, §570, Dec. 20, 2019, 133 Stat. 1397, provided that:

"(a) Establishment.—Not later than September 30, 2020, the Secretary of Defense shall establish and implement a standard record of service for members of the reserve components of the Armed Forces, similar to DD Form 214, that summarizes the record of service of each such member, including dates of active duty service.

"(b) Coordination.—In carrying out this section, the Secretary of Defense shall coordinate with the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to ensure that the record established under this section is acceptable as proof of service for former members of the reserve components of the Armed Forces who are eligible for benefits under laws administered by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to receive such benefits."
<PAGE>


                                  Exhibit 31.1

                                 CERTIFICATIONS

         I, Charles French, certify that:

         1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Hudson
Respiratory Care Inc.;

         2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

         3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

         4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

                  a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

                  b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

                  c. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's
internal control of over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth quarter in the
case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely
to affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

         5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent function):

                  a. All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to affect
adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and

                  b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's
internal control over financial reporting.


Date:    November 14, 2003                 /s/ Charles French
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Charles French

                                           Chief Executive Officer and President
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice 7321]

# AGENCY:

Department of State.

# ACTION:

Notice of the release of the Department of State FY10 Service Contract Inventory.

# SUMMARY:

The Department of State has publically released its Service Contract Inventory for FY10. Section 743 of Division C of the FY 2010 Consolidated Appropriations Act, Public Law 111-117, requires Department of State, and other civilian agencies, to submit an annual inventory of service contracts. A service contract inventory is a tool for assisting an agency in better understanding how contracted services are being used to support mission and operation, and whether the contractors' skills are being utilized in an appropriate manner. The Department followed OMB guidance, provided by memorandum titled `Service Contract Inventories', to prepare the inventory.

# DATES:

The inventory is available on the Department's Web site as of Jan 31, 2011.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Jason Passaro, Director, A/CSM, 703-875-5114,                         *passaroja@state.gov.*

Dated: February 3, 2011.

Jason Passaro, 

Director, A/CSM,  Department of State.

[FR Doc. 2011-3615 Filed 2-16-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710-24-P
IV

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 38

Prohibiting the payment of any amount from the reserve fund established

for unanticipated expenses of committees without the approval of the House.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 3, 1999

Mr. HOYER (for himself, Mr. STENHOLM, Mr. OBEY, Mr. SKELTON, Mr. LAFALCE, Mr. SPRATT, Mr. DINGELL, Mr. CLAY, Mr. WAXMAN, Mr.

GEJDENSON, Mr. CONYERS, Mr. GEORGE MILLER of California, Mr.

MOAKLEY, Mr. BROWN of California, Ms. VALA ́ZQUEZ, Mr. OBERSTAR,

Mr. EVANS, Mr. RANGEL, and Mr. DIXON) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Rules

RESOLUTION

Prohibiting the payment of any amount from the reserve

fund established for unanticipated expenses of committees without the approval of the House.

1 Resolved, That no amount may be paid from the re2 serve fund established for unanticipated expenses of com3 mittees pursuant to clause 6(a) of rule X of the Rules

4 of the House of Representatives unless the payment of

5 such amount is approved by the House.

Æ