alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Ferdinand Munch Brewery, Appellant, v. Grace Muller and Adolph Muller, Sued as John Doe, etc., Respondents. (Action No. 1.)

Judgment and order affirmed, as to each defendant, with costs. Ho opinion. Jenks, Hooker, Gaynor and Rich, JJ., concurred; Hirschberg, P. J., not voting.
# C_2014092EN.01003401.xml

| 29.3.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 92/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.3.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 92/34

---

Corrigendum to Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the TFEU — Cases where the Commission raises no objections

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 50 of 21 February 2014
  )

Official Journal of the European Union C 50 of 21 February 2014

2014/C 92/07

On page 24, the text referring to the State Aid No SA.37587 is cancelled and replaced by the following:

‘Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the TFEU

Cases where the Commission raises no objections

(Text with EEA relevance, except for products falling under Annex I of the Treaty)

| Date of adoption of the decision | 16.12.2013 |
| --- | --- |
| Aid number | SA.37587 (2013/N) |
| Member State | France |
| Region | — | Mixed |
| Title (and/or name of the beneficiary) | Aides à la recherche et au développement dans le secteur de la viande, des produits carnés, des ovoproduits, du lait et des produits laitiers |
| Legal basis | articles L. 621-1 et suivants du code rural et de la pêche maritime |
| Type of measure | Scheme | — |
| Objective | Research and development |
| Form of aid | Other |
| Budget | | Overall budget: EUR 9,6 (in millions) |

Date of adoption of the decision

16.12.2013

Aid number

SA.37587 (2013/N)

Member State

France

Region

—

Mixed

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

Aides à la recherche et au développement dans le secteur de la viande, des produits carnés, des ovoproduits, du lait et des produits laitiers

Legal basis

articles L. 621-1 et suivants du code rural et de la pêche maritime

Type of measure

Scheme

—

Objective

Research and development

Form of aid

Other

Budget

Overall budget: EUR 9,6 (in millions)

| | Annual budget: EUR 1,6 (in millions) |
| --- | --- |

Annual budget: EUR 1,6 (in millions)

Intensity

100 %

Duration (period)

until 31.12.2019

Economic sectors

AGRICULTURE, FORESTRY AND FISHING

Name and address of the granting authority

ministère de l'agriculture, de l'agroalimentaire et de la forêt 3 rue Barbet de Jouy - 75349 Paris 07 SP

Other information

—

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

http://ec.europa.eu/competition/elojade/isef/index.cfm’

---
#### § 20.320 What is TWEP?

TWEP is a program that provides work experience and job skills to enhance potential job placement for the general assistance recipient. TWEP programs can be incorporated within Public Law 93-638 self-determination contracts, Public Law 102-477 grants, and Public Law 103-413 self-governance annual funding agreements at the request of the tribe.
### §7653. Ordnance and ordnance stores: District of Columbia high schools

The Secretary of the Army, under regulations to be prescribed by him, may issue to the high schools of the District of Columbia ordnance and ordnance stores required for military instruction and practice. The Secretary shall require a bond in double the value of the property issued under this section, for the care and safekeeping of that property and, except for property properly expended, for its return when required.

(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 261, §4653; renumbered §7653, Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, §808(d), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1839.)

| Revised section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 4653 | 10:1183. | Feb. 5, 1891, J. Res. 9, 26 Stat. 1113. |

The words "at his discretion and", "belonging to the Government, and which can be spared for that purpose", and "in each case" are omitted as surplusage. The words "high schools of the" are substituted for the words "High School of Washington" since the various high schools of the District of Columbia have succeeded the Washington High School that existed at the time the statute was enacted. The words "except for property properly expended" are inserted for clarity.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 7653 was renumbered section 8853 of this title.

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–232 renumbered section 4653 of this title as this section.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2018 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 115–232 effective Feb. 1, 2019, with provision for the coordination of amendments and special rule for certain redesignations, see section 800 of Pub. L. 115–232, set out as a note preceding section 3001 of this title.
§ 169.118 May the right-of-way provide for non-monetary or varying types of compensation? ( a ) A right-of-way grant may provide for alternative forms of compensation and varying types of compensation, subject to the conditions in paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section: ( 1 ) Alternative forms of compensation may include but are not limited to, in-kind consideration and payments based on throughput or percentage of income; or
( 2 ) Varying types of compensation may include but are not limited to different types of payments at specific stages during the life of the right-of-way grant, such as fixed annual payments during construction, payments based on income during an operational period, and bonuses.
( b ) For tribal land, we will defer to the tribe's determination that the compensation under paragraph (a) of this section is in its best interest, if the tribe submits a signed certification or tribal authorization stating that it has determined the alternative form of compensation or varying type of compensation to be in its best interest.
( c ) For individually owned land, we may grant a right-of-way that provides for an alternative form of compensation or varying type of compensation if we determine that it is in the best interest of the Indian landowners.
Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed February 4, 2021.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-20-00349-CV

METROPOLITAN TRANSIT AUTHORITY OF HARRIS COUNTY, 

TEXAS, Appellant

V.

LEBRODERICK WILLIAMS AND RODERICK JELKS, Appellees

On Appeal from the 190th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2018-89979

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This appeal is from an order denying appellant Metropolitan Transit 

Authority’s motion to dismiss signed April 8, 2020. The clerk’s record was filed

May 26, 2020. No reporter’s record was taken. No brief was filed.

On December 22, 2020, this court issued an order stating that unless 

appellant filed a brief on or before January 11, 2021, the court would dismiss the 

appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b).
2

Appellant filed no brief or other response. We dismiss the appeal.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Bourliot, Zimmerer, and Spain.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                            9
<LEGEND>
THIS LEGEND CONTAINS SUMMARY INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE FORM 10-QSB FOR  THE
QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY  BY  REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                  1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                             3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                              SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                      3,263,235
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                     35,404,343
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                    0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                    0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 5,059,735
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                     44,539,923
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                       44,428,684
<LOANS>                                    49,490,730
<ALLOWANCE>                                   367,425
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                            142,039,248
<DEPOSITS>                                131,785,246
<SHORT-TERM>                                        0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                         1,255,085
<LONG-TERM>                                         0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           3,640
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                            0
<OTHER-SE>                                  8,995,277
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>            142,039,248
<INTEREST-LOAN>                               896,398
<INTEREST-INVEST>                           1,109,111
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                    0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                            2,005,509
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                          1,185,824
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          1,185,824
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                         819,685
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                               978,031
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                72,604
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     72,604
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                   48,193
<EPS-BASIC>                                    0.13
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0.13
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                   2.50
<LOANS-NON>                                   533,404
<LOANS-PAST>                                        0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                    0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                     0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                              365,863
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       0
<RECOVERIES>                                    1,562
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                             367,425
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                          178,753
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                       188,672



</TABLE>
IV

House Calendar No. 170

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 425

[Report No. 106–505]

Providing for consideration of motions to suspend the rules.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 29, 2000

Mr. REYNOLDS, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

RESOLUTION

Providing for consideration of motions to suspend the rules.

1 Resolved, That it shall be in order at any time on

2 the legislative day of Wednesday, March 8, 2000, for the

3 Speaker to entertain motions to suspend the rules. The

4 Speaker or his designee shall consult with the Minority

5 Leader or his designee on the designation of any matter

6 for consideration pursuant to this resolution.
House Calendar No. 170

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 425

[Report No. 106–505]

RESOLUTION

Providing for consideration of motions to suspend

the rules.

FEBRUARY 29, 2000

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be

printed
Exhibit 99.3

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Corey E. Shaker, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of Hometown Auto
Retailers, Inc.

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report.

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report.

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

      a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
      material information relating to the registrant, including its
      consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
      entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is
      being prepared;

      b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
      procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
      quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

      c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
      effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
      evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

      a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
      controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
      process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
      registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

      b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
      employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
      controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal
controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.


January 14, 2003                         /s/ Corey E. Shaker
                                         -------------------------------------
                                         Corey E. Shaker
                                         President and Chief Executive Officer
### §8118. Rank of line and staff corps officers of the Navy and officers of the Marine Corps

Except for an officer entitled to a rank higher than his grade, line and staff corps officers of the Navy serving in the same grade and officers of the Marine Corps serving in the corresponding grade rank among themselves according to their respective dates of rank in grade whether or not they are on an active-duty list.

(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 317, §5508; Pub. L. 90–179, §4, Dec. 8, 1967, 81 Stat. 547; Pub. L. 96–513, title V, §503(27), Dec. 12, 1980, 94 Stat. 2913; renumbered §8118, Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, §807(b)(2), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1834.)

| Revised section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 5508 | 34 U.S.C. 306f(d)(2). | Aug. 7, 1947, ch. 512, §311(d)(2), 61 Stat. 852; Aug. 5, 1949, ch. 402, §1(c), 63 Stat. 568. |

The word "rank" is substituted for the words "take precedence" throughout the section for uniformity of expression.

In subsection (a) the first sentence is broadened to include officers of the Marine Corps and officers not on a lineal list. Inclusion of the Marine Corps is possible because the sentence reflects the rule referred to by the Attorney General (25 Op. Atty. Gen. 517) as "an unwritten law of the Army and Navy" as to relative rank between officers in different services. Officers not on a lineal list may properly be included since the statement is consistent with the provisions for assigning lineal position to such officers when they become entitled to be placed on a list.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–232 renumbered section 5508 of this title as this section.

1980—Pub. L. 96–513 struck out designation "(a)" before "Except for an officer", substituted "an active-duty list" for "a lineal list", struck out sentence which had provided that a staff corps officer with the same date of rank as his running mate ranked above all line and staff corps officers junior to his running mate, and struck out subsec. (b) which had provided for a hierarchy of 9 categories of officers of the Navy to be used in ranking officers of the Navy on active duty serving in the same grade and having the same date of rank in that grade.

1967—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 90–179 added par. (6) and renumbered former pars. (6), (7), and (8) as pars. (7), (8), and (9), respectively.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2018 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 115–232 effective Feb. 1, 2019, with provision for the coordination of amendments and special rule for certain redesignations, see section 800 of Pub. L. 115–232, set out as a note preceding section 3001 of this title.

#### Effective Date of 1980 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 96–513 effective Sept. 15, 1981, see section 701 of Pub. L. 96–513, set out as a note under section 101 of this title.
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM ENGINEERS AND GEOLOGISTS**

As independent petroleum engineers, we hereby consent to the inclusion or incorporation by reference in the Amendment No. 1 to the Registration Statement on Form S-3 (No. 333-189394) and the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Pacific Coast Oil Trust of information from our firm’s reserves report dated February 13, 2014 and all references to our firm included in or made part of the Pacific Coast Oil Trust Annual Report on Form 10-K.

 

 
|   | **NETHERLAND, SEWELL &   ASSOCIATES, INC.** |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                      |
|   |                                                      |
|   | By:                                                       | /s/ J. Carter Henson Jr. |
|   | J. Carter Henson, Jr. P.E.                           |
|   | Senior Vice President                                     |

 

Houston, Texas

March 17, 2014

----
H. Res. 31

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

February 3, 1999.

Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule

XVIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee of the

Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of

the bill (H.R. 99) to amend title 49, United States Code, to

extend Federal Aviation Administration programs through

September 30, 1999, and for other purposes. The first reading of the bill shall be dispensed with. Points of order against

consideration of the bill for failure to comply with clause 4(a)

of rule XIII or section 302(f) or section 303(a) of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 are waived. General debate

shall be confined to the bill and shall not exceed one hour

equally divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking

minority member of the Committee on Transportation and

Infrastructure. After general debate, the bill shall be considered for amendment under the five-minute rule. In lieu of the

amendment recommended by the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure now printed in the bill, it shall be
2

•HRES 31 EH

in order to consider as an original bill for the purpose of

amendment under the five-minute rule the amendment in the

nature of a substitute printed in the Congressional Record

and numbered 1 pursuant to clause 8 of rule XVIII. Each

section of that amendment in the nature of a substitute shall

be considered as read. Points of order against the amendment

for failure to comply with clause 7 of rule XVI or section

302(f) or section 303(a) of the Congressional Budget Act of

1974 are waived. During consideration of the bill for amendment, the Chairman of the Committee of the Whole may accord priority in recognition on the basis of whether the Member offering an amendment has caused it to be printed in the

portion of the Congressional Record designated for that purpose in clause 8 of rule XVIII. Amendments so printed shall

be considered as read. The Chairman of the Committee of the

Whole may: (1) postpone until a time during further consideration in the Committee of the Whole a request for a recorded vote on any amendment; and (2) reduce to five minutes the minimum time for electronic voting on any postponed question that follows another electronic vote without

intervening business, provided that the minimum time for

electronic voting on the first in any series of questions shall

be 15 minutes. At the conclusion of consideration of the bill

for amendment the Committee shall rise and report the bill

to the House with such amendments as may have been adopt-
3

•HRES 31 EH

ed. Any Member may demand a separate vote in the House

on any amendment adopted in the Committee of the Whole

to the bill or to the amendment in the nature of a substitute

made in order as original text. The previous question shall be

considered as ordered on the bill and amendments thereto to

final passage without intervening motion except one motion

to recommit with or without instructions.

Attest:

Clerk.
REPORT ON ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION'S REGULATION AB SERVICING CRITERIA





For the calendar year ending December
31, 2014, National Tax Search, LLC has been a Tax Service Vendor for Wells Fargo Bank (the “Servicer”).



National Tax Search, LLC (“NTS”)
is responsible for assessing compliance as of December 31, 2014 and for the period from January 1, 2014 through December 31, 2014
(the “Reporting Period”) with the servicing criteria set forth in Title 17, Section 229.1122(d) of the Code of Federal
Regulations (the “CFR”). NTS has used the servicing criteria communicated to NTS by the Servicer to assess compliance
with the applicable servicing criteria. Only servicing criteria 1122(d)(l)(ii), 1122(d)l(iv), 1122(d)2(ii), 1122(d)2(v), 1122(d)2(vi),
1122(d)2(vii), 1122(d)(4)(xi), and 1122(d)(4)(xii) (the “Applicable Servicing Criteria”) are applicable to the activities
NTS performs with respect to the transactions covered by this report. NTS has determined that the remaining servicing criteria
set forth in Item 1122 (d) of the SEC Regulation AB are not applicable to the activities it performs with respect to the transactions
covered by this report. The transactions covered by this report include all tax payments made on behalf of the Servicer using NTS's
TaxQ system (the “Platform Transactions”).



NTS, as a vendor, has assessed its compliance
with the Applicable Servicing Criteria for the Reporting Period and has concluded that the NTS has complied, in all material respects,
with the Applicable Servicing Criteria as of December 31, 2014 and for the Reporting Period with respect to the Platform Transactions
taken as a whole.



Plante & Moran, PLLC, an independent
registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report on the assessment of compliance with the Applicable Servicing
Criteria as of December 31, 2014 and for the Reporting Period as set forth in this assertion.



National Tax Search, LLC, as Vendor
to Servicer





Lori D. Eshoo, President/CEO

January 12, 2015