alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §3675. Capital lease or lease-purchase treated as an acquisition

(a) In General.—If a lease or charter covered by this chapter is a capital lease or a lease-purchase—

(1) the lease or charter shall be treated as an acquisition and shall be subject to all applicable statutory and regulatory requirements for the acquisition of aircraft, naval vessels, or combat vehicles; and

(2) funds appropriated to the Department of Defense for operation and maintenance may not be obligated or expended for the lease or charter.

(b) Definitions.—In this section, the terms "capital lease" and "lease-purchase" have the meanings given those terms in Appendix B to Office of Management and Budget Circular A–11, as in effect on January 6, 2006.

(Added and amended Pub. L. 116–283, div. A, title XVIII, §1825(a), (g), Jan. 1, 2021, 134 Stat. 4206, 4208.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

The text of subsec. (f) of section 2401 of this title, which was transferred to this section and amended by Pub. L. 116–283, §1825(g), was based on Pub. L. 109–163, div. A, title VIII, §815(c)(2), Jan. 6, 2006, 119 Stat. 3382; Pub. L. 111–84, div. A, title X, §1073(a)(24), Oct. 28, 2009, 123 Stat. 2473.

#### Amendments

2021—Pub. L. 116–283, §1825(g)(1)(A), transferred subsec. (f) of section 2401 of this title to this section, struck out subsec. (f) designation at beginning, and redesignated pars. (1) and (2) of such former subsec. (f) as subsecs. (a) and (b), respectively.

Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 116–283, §1825(g)(2), after redesignation of section 2401(f)(1) of this title as subsec. (a) of this section, inserted heading, substituted "this chapter" for "this section" in introductory provisions, and redesignated subpars. (A) and (B) as pars. (1) and (2), respectively.

Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 116–283, §1825(g)(3), after redesignation of section 2401(d)(2) of this title as subsec. (b) of this section, inserted heading and substituted "In this section" for "In this subsection".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section and amendment by Pub. L. 116–283 effective Jan. 1, 2022, with additional provisions for delayed implementation and applicability of existing law, see section 1801(d) of Pub. L. 116–283, set out as an Effective Date of 2021 Amendment note preceding section 3001 of this title.
§ 170.435 When is a public hearing required? The Tribe, or BIA or FHWA after consultation with the appropriate Tribe and other involved agencies, determines whether or not a public hearing is needed for a TTPTIP, a LRTP, or a project. A public hearing must be held if a project: ( a ) Is for the construction of a new route or facility;
( b ) Would significantly change the layout or function of connecting or related roads or streets;
( c ) Would cause a substantial adverse effect on adjacent property; or
( d ) Is controversial or expected to be controversial in nature.
###### Editorial Note on Part 224

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 224 appear at 84 FR 69611, Dec. 18, 2019.

#### § 224.172 May a Tribe rescind only some of the activities subject to a TERA while retaining a portion of those activities?

No. A Tribe may only rescind a TERA in its entirety, including the authority to approve leases, business agreements and grant rights-of-way for specific energy resource development, not some of the authority or activities subject to the TERA.
#### § 162.246 Must an amendment, assignment, sublease, or mortgage approved under an agricultural lease be recorded?

An amendment, assignment, sublease, or mortgage approved under an agricultural lease must be recorded in our Land Titles and Records Office that has jurisdiction over the leased premises. We will record the document immediately following our approval under this subpart.
### Geology of the oxidized uranium ore deposits of the Tordilla Hill-Deweesville area, Karnes County, Texas; a study of a district before mining

By: C. M. BunkerJ. A. MacKallor

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/pp765

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plate:  **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
- NGMDB Index Page:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**                            (html)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

No abstract available.

#### Study Area

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
#### § 227.13 Vested rights to be respected.

All drilling and other oil and natural gas developments and mining operations, work, and improvements, and all other acts and things necessary to be done, in connection with the exploration for mining and production of oil and natural gas from the leased premises, under the terms and conditions of a lease shall be performed with due regard to the rights, statutory and otherwise, of others, if any, who may have or who may acquire a lawful claim or estate to the leased premises, separate and distinct from the oil and gas or other mineral therein contained. See act of July 17, 1914 (38 Stat. 509).
-80 -79 -78 -77 -76 -75 -74

 38

 39

 40

 41

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★ ▲ ▲

▲

▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 100

18 12 06 00

08/23

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 23 Aug 06

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 38.90 N 76.65 W Meters AGL

★

■

■

■

■

★

■ ■

■

■

★

●

●

●

●

★

●

●

● ●
### **CHAPTER 777—TRANSPORTATION**

Sec.
7749.
Property: for United States surveys.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**2018**—Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, §808(e)(4), (f)(1), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1839, redesignated chapter 447 of this title as this chapter and item 4749 as 7749.

**2004**—Pub. L. 108–375, div. A, title X, §1072(d)(2), Oct. 28, 2004, 118 Stat. 2058, struck out items 4741 "Control and supervision", 4743 "Officers: use of transportation", 4744 "Persons and supplies: sea transportation", 4745 "Civilian passengers and commercial cargoes: transports in trans-Atlantic service", 4746 "Civilian personnel in Alaska", and 4747 "Passengers and merchandise to Guam: sea transport".

**1996**—Pub. L. 104–201, div. A, title IX, §906(d)(2), Sept. 23, 1996, 110 Stat. 2620, struck out item 4742 "Control of transportation systems in time of war".

**1962**—Pub. L. 87–651, title I, §119(2), Sept. 7, 1962, 76 Stat. 513, struck out item 4748 "Motor vehicles: for members on permanent change of station".
IV

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 311

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 1136) to increase the availability

and choice of quality health care.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 28, 1999

Mr. NORWOOD submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on Rules

RESOLUTION

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 1136) to

increase the availability and choice of quality health care.

1 Resolved, That immediately upon the adoption of this

2 resolution the House shall without intervention of any

3 point of order resolve into the Committee of the Whole

4 House on the state of the Union for consideration of the

5 bill (H.R. 1136) to increase the availability and choice of

6 quality health care. The first reading of the bill shall be

7 dispensed with. General debate shall be confined to the

8 bill and shall not exceed 120 minutes, with 60 minutes

9 of debate to be equally divided and controlled by the chair10 man and ranking minority member of the Committee on
2

•HRES 311 IH

1 Commerce, 30 minutes of debate to be equally divided and

2 controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member

3 of the Committee on Ways and Means and 30 minutes

4 of debate to be equally divided and controlled by the chair5 man and ranking minority member of the Committee on

6 Education and the Workforce. After general debate the

7 bill shall be considered for amendment under the five8 minute rule. The bill shall be considered by title rather

9 than by section. Each title shall be considered as read.

10 During consideration of the bill for amendment, the Chair11 man of the Committee of the Whole may accord priority

12 in recognition on the basis of whether the member offering

13 an amendment has caused it to be printed in the portion

14 of the Congressional Record designated for that purpose

15 in clause 8 in rule XVIII. At the conclusion of consider16 ation of the bill for amendment, the Committee shall rise

17 and report the bill to the House with such amendments

18 as may have been adopted. The previous question shall

19 be considered as ordered on the bill and amendments

20 thereto to final passage without intervening motion, except

21 one motion to recommit with or without instructions.

22 SEC. 2. If the Committee of the Whole rises and re23 ports that it has come to no resolution on the bill, then

24 on the next legislative day the House shall, immediately

25 after the third daily order of business under clause 1 of
3

•HRES 311 IH

1 rule XIV, resolve into the Committee of the Whole for fur2 ther consideration of the bill.

Æ
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

In accordance with Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), announces the aforementioned meeting:

*Times and Dates:*                     12 p.m.-2 p.m., March 29, 2011 (Closed).                

*Place:*                     Teleconference.                

*Status:*                     The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with provisions set forth in Section 552b(c)(4) and (6), Title 5 U.S.C., and the Determination of the Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, CDC, pursuant to Public Law 92-463.                

*Matters To Be Discussed:*                     The meeting will include the initial review, discussion, and evaluation of applications received in response to “Emerging Infections Sentinel Network (EISN) Research, FOA CK11-002, initial review.”                

*Contact Person for More Information:*                     Gregory Anderson, MS, MPH, Scientific Review Officer, CDC, 1600 Clifton Road, NE., Mailstop E60, Atlanta, Georgia 30333, Telephone: (404) 498-2293.                

                    The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, has been delegated the authority to sign                     **Federal Register**                     notices pertaining to announcements of meetings and other committee management activities, for both the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.                

Dated: February 4, 2011.

Elaine L. Baker,

Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

[FR Doc. 2011-3529 Filed 2-15-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
#### Sarah E. Kelly, Appellant, v. The Home Savings Bank of the City of Albany and Franklin B. Beers and Harvey S. Bedell, as Executors, etc., of Kate V. Beers, Deceased, Respondents.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. No opinion. All concurred, except Kellogg and Sewell, JJ., dissenting.
### **CHAPTER 903—DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE**

Sec.
9011.
Organization.
9012.
Department of the Air Force: seal.
9013.
Secretary of the Air Force.
9014.
Office of the Secretary of the Air Force.
9015.
Under Secretary of the Air Force.
9016.
Assistant Secretaries of the Air Force.
9017.
Secretary of the Air Force: successors to duties.
9018.
Administrative Assistant.
9019.
General Counsel.
9020.
Inspector General.
9021.
Space Acquisition Council.
9021a.
Air Force Reserve Forces Policy Committee.
9022.
Financial management.
9023.
Chief of Legislative Liaison.
9023a.
Legislative Liaison of the Space Force.
9024.
Director of Small Business Programs.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior chapter 903, consisting of sections 9331 to 9362, related to the United States Air Force Academy, prior to renumbering as chapter 953 of this title.

#### Amendments

**2023**—Pub. L. 118–31, div. A, title V, §509B, Dec. 22, 2023, 137 Stat. 243, added item 9023a. Amendment was made pursuant to operation of section 102 of this title.

**2021**—Pub. L. 117–81, div. A, title XVI, §1602(a)(3), Dec. 27, 2021, 135 Stat. 2076, substituted "Space Acquisition Council" for "Space Force Acquisition Council" in item 9021.

**2019**—Pub. L. 116–92, div. A, title IX, §954(b), Dec. 20, 2019, 133 Stat. 1565, added items 9021 and 9021a and struck out former item 9021 "Air Force Reserve Forces Policy Committee".

**2018**—Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, §806(d)(4), (e)(1), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1833, redesignated chapter 803 of this title as this chapter and items 8011 to 8024 as 9011 to 9024, respectively.

**2006**—Pub. L. 109–163, div. A, title IX, §904(e)(2), Jan. 6, 2006, 119 Stat. 3402, added item 8024.

**2002**—Pub. L. 107–314, div. A, title V, §504(e)(1)(B), Dec. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 2532, added item 8023.

**1988**—Pub. L. 100–456, div. A, title VII, §702(c)(3), Sept. 29, 1988, 102 Stat. 1996, added item 8022.

**1986**—Pub. L. 99–433, title V, §521(b), Oct. 1, 1986, 100 Stat. 1060, amended analysis generally, substituting items 8011 to 8021 for former items 8010 to 8019.

**1967**—Pub. L. 90–168, §2(20), Dec. 1, 1967, 81 Stat. 525, added item 8019.

**1964**—Pub. L. 88–426, title III, §§305(40)(B), 306(j)(8), Aug. 14, 1964, 78 Stat. 427, 432, struck out "; compensation" from item 8012, and struck out item 8018 "Compensation of General Counsel".

**1962**—Pub. L. 87–651, title II, §213(b), Sept. 7, 1962, 76 Stat. 524, added item 8010.

**1958**—Pub. L. 85–861, §1(154)(B), Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1513, added item 8018.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Senate Homeland Security, Governmental Affairs Committee Staff Tour Emory S. Land 

By Mass Communication Specialist 3rd Class Jason AmadiUSS Emory S. Land (AS 39) Public Affairs

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More Articles/News
#### § 242.3 Authority to operate.

The association may conduct commercial fishing operations on the reservation under authority of its articles of incorporation and by-laws only in accordance with the regulations in this part.
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA

No. 13-1049

Filed April 30, 2014

MOHAMED A. IBRAHIM,

Applicant-Appellant,

vs.

STATE OF IOWA,

Respondent-Appellee.

________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Marshall County, Michael J. Moon, 

Judge. 

An applicant appeals the court’s dismissal of his postconviction-relief 

application. AFFIRMED.

Mark C. Smith, State Appellate Defender, and Shellie L. Knipfer, Assistant 

Appellate Defender, for appellant.

Thomas J. Miller, Attorney General, Kevin Cmelik, Assistant Attorney 

General, Jennifer Miller, County Attorney, and James Scheetz, Assistant County 

Attorney, for appellee.

Considered by Vogel, P.J., and Doyle and Mullins, JJ.
2

MULLINS, J.

Mohamed Ibrahim appeals the court’s summary dismissal of his 

postconviction-relief (PCR) application, asserting his deportation is a ground of 

fact that could not have been raised within the three-year statute of limitations 

applicable to PCR applications. He was convicted of various offenses on May 

29, 2008, and no appeal was filed. In 2012 Ibrahim was ordered to be removed 

from the country based on his criminal history when he applied for citizenship. 

He filed an application for PCR on May 7, 2012, asserting counsel failed to 

ensure critical proceedings and documents were translated for him, failed to 

advise him of the immigration consequences of his guilty pleas, and the district 

court failed to advise him of the immigration consequences as well. The State 

filed a motion to dismiss based on the three-year statute of limitations for PCR 

actions. After a hearing, the district court granted the motion to dismiss. 

The case of Padilla v. Kentucky, 130 S. Ct. 1473, 1486 (2010), does not 

have retroactive application. See Chaidez v. United States, 133 S. Ct. 1103, 

1113 (2013). Ibrahim’s conviction was final before Padilla was decided, and 

therefore, Ibrahim cannot take advantage of Padilla’s holding that counsel owed

him a duty to explain the immigration consequences of the guilty pleas. See 

Perez v. State, 816 N.W.2d 354, 355 (Iowa 2012) (noting that if it is decided 

Padilla does not have retroactive application, the defendant cannot rely upon it to 

set aside an earlier conviction). In addition, Ibrahim failed to file his PCR 

application within the applicable three-year statute of limitations. While Ibrahim 

may not have known of the deportation consequences until he was arrested and 
3

the order of deportation was issued, the immigration consequences of his pleas 

were in existence during the three-year limitations period and a claim of a “lack of 

knowledge ‘is not provided as a ground for exception from the effects of the 

statute of limitations.’” Lopez-Penaloza v. State, 804 N.W.2d 537, 542 (Iowa Ct. 

App. 2011) (citation omitted). We therefore summarily affirm the district court’s 

dismissal of Ibrahim’s PCR application pursuant to Iowa Court Rule 21.26(a) and 

(c). 

AFFIRMED.
ineffective was itself procedurally barred. Hathaway v. State, 119 Nev.

248, 252-53, 71 P.3d 503, 506 (2003). Further, appellant's reliance upon Martinez was misplaced as Martinez relates to federal procedural bars and not state procedural bars. Also, we note that Martinez involves ineffective assistance of post-conviction counsel and not ineffective assistance of trial counsel. Therefore, the district court did not err in denying this claim.

Next, appellant claimed that Missouri v. Frye, 566 U.S. 132 S. Ct. 1399 (2012), provided good cause because trial counsel was ineffective in advising him to accept a plea offer from the State. Appellant's good-cause argument was without merit because this claim was always available and he failed to demonstrate why he waited nearly three years to raise it. Further, his case was final when Frye was decided, and he failed to demonstrate that the case would apply retroactively to him. Even if Frye announced new rules of constitutional law, he failed to allege that he met either exception to the general principle that such rules do not apply retroactively to cases which were already final when the new rules were announced. See Colwell v. State, 118 Nev. 807, 816-17, 59 P.3d 463, 469-70 (2002). Therefore, the district court did not err in denying this claim. Finally, appellant claimed that new evidence demonstrated that he was actually innocent of burglary. Appellant did not demonstrate actual innocence because he failed to show that "it is more likely than not that no reasonable juror would have convicted him in light of. . . new evidence." Calderon v. Thompson, 523 U.S. 538, 559 (1998) (quoting Schlup v. Delo, 513 U.S. 298, 327 (1995)); see also Pellegrini v. State, 117 Nev. 860, 887, 34 P.3d 519, 537 (2001); Mazzan v. Warden, 112 Nev. 838,

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA
(0) 1947A 2J.

842, 921 P.2d 920, 922 (1996). We therefore conclude that the district court did not err in denying appellant's petition, and we

ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED. 2

Hardesty

Parraguirre J.

J.

cc: Hon. Jennifer P. Togliatti, District Judge John Lee Rush Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk

2We have reviewed all documents that appellant has submitted in proper person to the clerk of this court in this matter, and we conclude that no relief based upon those submissions is warranted. To the extent that appellant has attempted to present claims or facts in those submissions which were not previously presented in the proceedings below, we have declined to consider them in the first instance.

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA
(0) 1947A 49ge 3

II
§ 179.1 What is the purpose of this part? This part contains the authorities, policies, and procedures governing the administration of life estates and future interests in trust and restricted property by the Secretary of Interior. This part does not apply to any use rights assigned to tribal members by tribes in the exercise of their jurisdiction over tribal lands. ( a ) Subpart A contains general provisions.
( b ) Subpart B describes life estates not created under the American Indian Probate Reform Act of 2004 (AIPRA), as described in § 179.3(b).
( c ) Subpart C describes life estates created under AIPRA, as described in § 179.3(a).