alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §8587. Election of annuity for self and beneficiary

(a) At the time of his retirement, a civilian member retiring under this chapter may elect to receive instead of the amount payable annually by the Secretary of the Navy under section 8585 or 8586 of this title a reduced annuity for his life and an annuity payable after his death to his beneficiary in either—

(1) an amount equal to his reduced annuity; or

(2) an amount equal to 50 percent of his reduced annuity.

The annuities payable to principal and beneficiary, under either election, shall be in amounts that have, on the date of the retirement of the civilian member, a combined actuarial value equal to the actuarial value of the annuity payable by the Secretary under section 8585 or 8586 of this title, as determined under actuarial tables prepared by the Director of the Office of Personnel Management.

(b) If the civilian member elects to take a reduced annuity under this section, he shall, at the time of his retirement, designate the beneficiary in writing and file the designation with the Secretary.

(c) The annuity payable under this section to the beneficiary of a deceased civilian member shall be terminated upon the death of the beneficiary.

(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 440, §7087; Pub. L. 97–295, §1(45), Oct. 12, 1982, 96 Stat. 1298; renumbered §8587 and amended Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, §§807(c)(1), 809(a), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1836, 1840.)

| Revised section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 7087 | 34 U.S.C. 1073c–3. | Jan. 16, 1936, ch. 3, §4C; added Aug. 2, 1946, ch. 740, 60 Stat. 805. |

In subsection (a) the words "under actuarial tables prepared by the Civil Service Commission" are substituted for the words "under the provisions of the Civil Service Retirement Act" because that Act, as amended in 1948, no longer provides for the computation of actuarial values. The Secretary of the Navy, in administering the provisions of law codified in this section, uses tables prepared by the Civil Service Commission prior to the 1948 amendment.

#### 1982 Act

This amends 10:7087(a) to reflect the transfer of functions from the Civil Service Commission to the Director of the Office of Personnel Management under section 102 of Reorganization Plan No. 2 of 1978 (eff. Jan. 1, 1979, 92 Stat. 3783).

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–232, §807(c)(1), renumbered section 7087 of this title as this section.

Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 115–232, §809(a), substituted "section 8585 or 8586" for "section 7085 or 7086" in introductory provisions and concluding provisions.

1982—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 97–295 substituted "Director of the Office of Personnel Management" for "Civil Service Commission".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2018 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 115–232 effective Feb. 1, 2019, with provision for the coordination of amendments and special rule for certain redesignations, see section 800 of Pub. L. 115–232, set out as a note preceding section 3001 of this title.
§ 211.44 Suspension of operations. ( a ) After the expiration of the primary term of the lease the Secretary may approve suspension of operations for remedial purposes which are necessary for continued production, to protect the resource, the environment, or for other good reasons. *Provided,* that such remedial operations are conducted in accordance with 43 CFR part 3160, subpart 3165 and under such stipulations and conditions as may be prescribed by the Secretary and are conducted with reasonable diligence. Any suspension shall not relieve the lessee from liability for the payment of rental and other payments as required by lease provisions.
( b ) An application for permission to suspend operations or production for economic or marketing reasons on a lease capable of production after the expiration of the primary term of lease duration must be accompanied by the written consent of the Indian mineral owner, an economic analysis, and an executed amendment by the parties to the lease setting forth the provisions pertaining to the suspension of operations and production. Such application shall be treated as a negotiated change to lease provisions, and as such, shall be subject to review and approval by the Secretary.
H. Res. 338

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

October 21, 1999.

Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule

XVIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee of the

Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of

the bill (H.R. 2300) to allow a State to combine certain

funds to improve the academic achievement of all its students. The first reading of the bill shall be dispensed with.

General debate shall be confined to the bill and shall not exceed two hours equally divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on Education and the Workforce. After general debate the bill shall

be considered for amendment under the five-minute rule. It

shall be in order to consider as an original bill for the purpose of amendment under the five-minute rule the amendment in the nature of a substitute recommended by the Committee on Education and the Workforce now printed in the

bill, modified by the amendments printed in part A of the report of the Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution.
2

•HRES 338 EH

That amendment in the nature of a substitute shall be considered as read. Points of order against that amendment in

the nature of a substitute for failure to comply with clause

4 of rule XXI are waived. No amendment to that amendment

in the nature of a substitute shall be in order except those

printed in part B of the report of the Committee on Rules.

Each amendment may be offered only in the order printed in

the report, may be offered only by a Member designated in

the report, shall be considered as read, shall be debatable for

the time specified in the report equally divided and controlled

by the proponent and an opponent, shall not be subject to

amendment, and shall not be subject to a demand for division

of the question in the House or in the Committee of the

Whole. The Chairman of the Committee of the Whole may:

(1) postpone until a time during further consideration in the

Committee of the Whole a request for a recorded vote on any

amendment; and (2) reduce to five minutes the minimum

time for electronic voting on any postponed question that follows another electronic vote without intervening business,

provided that the minimum time for electronic voting on the

first in any series of questions shall be 15 minutes. At the

conclusion of consideration of the bill for amendment the

Committee shall rise and report the bill to the House with

such amendments as may have been adopted. Any Member

may demand a separate vote in the House on any amendment
3

•HRES 338 EH

adopted in the Committee of the Whole to the bill or to the

amendment in the nature of a substitute made in order as

original text. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill and amendments thereto to final passage

without intervening motion except one motion to recommit

with or without instruction.

Attest:

Clerk.
#### § 225.26 Auditing and accounting.

The Secretary may conduct audits relating to the scope, nature and extent of compliance with the minerals agreement and with applicable regulations and orders to lessees, operators, revenue payors, and other persons with rental, royalty, net profit share and other payment requirements arising from the provisions of a minerals agreement. Procedures and standards used for accounting and auditing of minerals agreements will be in accordance with audit standards established by the Comptroller General of the United States, in “Standards for Auditing of Governmental Organizations, Programs, Activities, and Functions, 1981,” and standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants.
#### The Bracken-McAveney Company, a Corporation, Respondent, v. Harry Miller and Others, Appellants, Impleaded with The City of New York, Defendant.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Woodward, Jenks, Hooker, Gay-nor and Miller, JJ., concurred.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  News & Policy 
-  Statements 
-  Statement On PBGC OIG Risk Advisory On Special Financial ... 

This page has not been translated. Please go to PBGC.gov's Spanish home page for more information available in Spanish.

Esta página no ha sido traducida. Por favor vaya a la página principal del sitio de español de PBGC para ver información disponible en español.

# Statement on PBGC OIG Risk Advisory on Special Financial Assistance Final Rule

December 7, 2022

The Special Financial Assistance (SFA) Program, established under the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021, provides funds to severely underfunded multiemployer pension plans and ensures that millions of workers, retirees, and their families receive the pension benefits they earned through many years of hard work.

PBGC has worked diligently to implement the SFA Program by issuing regulations and guidance, developing internal controls to mitigate risks, processing applications for special financial assistance, and by keeping stakeholders, the public and Congress informed.

Working with our Board agencies, PBGC promulgated the SFA Final Rule, which PBGC and its Board strongly feel was appropriately constructed to achieve the core statutory directive to provide severely underfunded multiemployer pension plans with sufficient assets to pay benefits through 2051.

We will of course continue to cooperate and answer any questions on any issues raised by our oversight community.

PBGC will continue to comply with our statutory obligations to receive, review and approve or deny SFA applications within the 120-day review period. SFA applicants remain able to submit applications by following the instructions available at American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 - More Resources.

PBGC remains committed to ensuring the successful implementation of the SFA Program.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 

Home : Media : Photos

slide show module

USINDOPACOM attends 2024 Indonesia Bilateral Defense Discussions Mid-Term Review with Tentara Nasional Indonesia

MARFORPAC conducts waterborne gunnery live-fire exercise during Exercise Balikatan

MARFORPAC conducts counter landing live-fire exercise during Exercise Balikatan 24

US, Japan conduct flight demonstrations during MCAS Iwakuni’s 45th Friendship Day

US, Philippines conduct joint force Multi-Domain Task Force operation during Exercise Balikatan 24

15th MEU, USS Boxer conduct reconnaissance and surveillance mission in the Pacific Ocean

MARFORPAC, Philippine Marines conduct urban operations training during Exercise Balikatan 24

Guam National Guard launches State Partnership with Palau

USARPAC, Philippine Air Force combine air defense systems for first time ever during Exercise Balikatan 24

USS Howard conducts routine flight quarters while transiting the South China Sea
# C_2013220EN.01002301.xml

| 1.8.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 220/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.8.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 220/23

---

Notice concerning the implementation of Article 9a(7) of Regulation (EC) No 550/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the provision of air navigation services in the single European sky

(Publication of Member States' decisions establishing Functional Airspace Blocks)

2013/C 220/09

| Member State(s) | Reference | Name of functional airspace block | Entry into force |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Kingdom of Belgium,
  French Republic,
  Federal Republic of Germany,
  Grand Duchy of Luxembourg,
  Kingdom of the Netherlands,
  Swiss Confederation | State Agreement signed on 2 December 2010 | FABEC | 1 June 2013 |

Member State(s)

Reference

Name of functional airspace block

Entry into force

Kingdom of Belgium,

French Republic,

Federal Republic of Germany,

Grand Duchy of Luxembourg,

Kingdom of the Netherlands,

Swiss Confederation

State Agreement signed on 2 December 2010

FABEC

1 June 2013

---
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 411 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                      February 1, 2000.
    Resolved, That the following named Member be, and is hereby, elected to the 
following standing Committee of the House of Representatives:
    Committee on Banking: Ms. Lee of California to rank immediately after Mr. 
Meeks of New York.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
§ 161.801 May decisions under this part be appealed? ( a ) Appeals of BIA decisions issued under this part may be taken in accordance with procedures in part 2 of 25 CFR.
( b ) All appeals of decisions by the Grazing Committee and Resources Committee will be forwarded to the Navajo Nation's Office of Hearings and Appeals.
#### Mary Wheeler, Appellant, v. Jay Northrup and Mary G. Northrup, His Wife, Respondents.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concurred.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Graham Packaging Holdings Company on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Philip R. Yates, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|   | 1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Graham Packaging Holdings Company. |
|--------|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

Date: August 11, 2006

 

 

| By:    | /s/ Philip R. Yates     |
|--------|-------------------------|
|   | Philip R. Yates         |
|   | Chief Executive Officer |

 

 

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Korean People Will Preserve Legacy of American Service Members, Attaché Tells Vets

By xxxC. Todd Lopez

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More Articles/News
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 217 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                         June 23, 1999.
    Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it shall be in order to 
consider in the House the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 33) proposing an amendment 
to the Constitution of the United States authorizing the Congress to prohibit 
the physical desecration of the flag of the United States. The joint resolution 
shall be considered as read for amendment. The previous question shall be 
considered as ordered on the joint resolution and any amendment thereto to final 
passage without intervening motion except: (1) two hours of debate equally 
divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of the 
Committee on the Judiciary; (2) an amendment in the nature of a substitute, if 
offered by Representative Conyers of Michigan or his designee, which shall be 
considered as read and shall be separately debatable for one hour equally 
divided and controlled by the proponent and an opponent; and (3) one motion to 
recommit with or without instructions.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
AD Economic Evaluation

Docket No. FAA-2012-0704 Directorate ID: 2012-SW-040-AD

Helicopter Model: Eurocopter Deutschland GmbH Model MBB-BK 117 (all versions) and BO105LS A-3 Helicopters

Number of Helicopters (U.S. Operators): 130 Helicopters in the US Registry.

Reason: The actions specified by this AD are intended to prevent failure of the tail rotor pitch 

link and subsequent loss of control of the helicopter.

Costs:

Parts per Helicopter $1,442 to replace a pitch link

Labor per Helicopter

(1.5 x $85/work-hour for 

the inspection)

(1.5 x $85/work-hour for a 

replacement)

$127

$127

Other (Explain)

Total Cost per Helicopter $127 for the inspection

$1,569 for a replacement

Total US Fleet Cost $16,510 for the inspection

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action?” Yes ( ) No ()

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant? Yes ( ) Explain Below No ()

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

Yes ( ) No ()

Project Engineer: Sharon Miles
# C_2006212EN.01000601.xml

| 2.9.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 212/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.9.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 212/6

---

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 22 June 2006 — August Storck KG v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

(Case C-24/05 P) (1)

1

(Appeal - Community trade mark - Article 7(1)(b) and (3) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 - Absolute ground for refusal to register - Three-dimensional mark - Three-dimensional shape of a light-brown sweet - Distinctive character)

(2006/C 212/10)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Appellant: August Storck KG (represented by: I. Rohr, H. Wrage-Molkenthin and T. Reher, Lawyers)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: G. Schneider, Agent)

Other party to the proceedings:

Re:

Appeal against the judgment of the Court of First Instance (Fourth Chamber) of 10 November 2004 in Case T-396/02 Storck v OHIM, whereby the Court of First Instance dismissed the action for annulment of the refusal to register a three-dimensional trade mark consisting of the shape of a light-brown sweet for confectionery within Class 30 — Distinctive character of a trade mark — Article 7(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 of 20 December 1993 on the Community trade mark (OJ 1994 L 11, p. 1)

Storck

OHIM

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders August Storck KG to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders August Storck KG to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 69, 19.03.2005.

1

---
### §8264. Shore patrol duty: payment of expenses

An officer, midshipman, or cadet of the naval service who is assigned to shore patrol duty away from his vessel or other duty station may be paid his actual services.

(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 386, §6153; renumbered §8264, Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, §807(b)(10), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1835.)

| Revised section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 6153 | 37 U.S.C. 306 (less applicability to Coast Guard). | Oct. 12, 1949, ch. 681, §506 (less applicability to Coast Guard), 63 Stat. 828. |

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–232 renumbered section 6153 of this title as this section.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2018 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 115–232 effective Feb. 1, 2019, with provision for the coordination of amendments and special rule for certain redesignations, see section 800 of Pub. L. 115–232, set out as a note preceding section 3001 of this title.