alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# 7th Fleet Destroyer Transits Taiwan Strait

By  U.S. 7th Fleet Public Affairs

                TAIWAN STRAIT  –              
Arleigh Burke-class guided-missile destroyer USS Chung-Hoon (DDG 93) and Royal Canadian Navy Halifax-class frigate HMCS Montreal (FFH 336) are conducting a routine Taiwan Strait transit June 3 (local time) through waters where high-seas freedoms of navigation and overflight apply in accordance with international law. The ships transit through a corridor in the Strait that is beyond the territorial sea of any coastal State. Chung-Hoon and Montreal's bilateral transit through the Taiwan Strait demonstrates the commitment of the United States and our allies and partners to a free and open Indo-Pacific. Cooperation like this represents the centerpiece of our approach to a secure and prosperous region where aircraft and ships of all nations may fly, sail and operate anywhere international law allows.

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  About PBGC 
-  Projections Report 
-  Pension Insurance Modeling System (PIMS) 
-  2014 MAP-21 Peer Reviews 

This page has not been translated. Please go to PBGC.gov's Spanish home page for more information available in Spanish.

Esta página no ha sido traducida. Por favor vaya a la página principal del sitio de español de PBGC para ver información disponible en español.

# 2014 MAP-21 Peer Reviews

Six-month reports
                          - Evaluation of PIMS Modeling of Macroeconomic Variables
                          - Evaluation of PIMS Documentation
                          - Evaluation of Model Output

June 6, 2017
### §9271. Medal of honor: award

The President may award, and present in the name of Congress, a medal of honor of appropriate design, with ribbons and appurtenances, to a person who, while a member of the Air Force or the Space Force, distinguishes himself conspicuously by gallantry and intrepidity at the risk of his life above and beyond the call of duty—

(1) while engaged in an action against an enemy of the United States;

(2) while engaged in military operations involving conflict with an opposing foreign force; or

(3) while serving with friendly foreign forces engaged in an armed conflict against an opposing armed force in which the United States is not a belligerent party.

(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 540, §8741; Pub. L. 88–77, §3(1), July 25, 1963, 77 Stat. 94; renumbered §9271, Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, §806(b)(11), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1833; Pub. L. 116–283, div. A, title IX, §923(c)(12)(A)(i), Jan. 1, 2021, 134 Stat. 3811.)

| Revised section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 8741 | 10:1403. | July 9, 1918, ch. 143, (8th par. under "Ordnance Department"), 40 Stat. 870. |

The words "That the provisions of existing law relating to the award of medals of honor to officers, noncommissioned officers, and privates of the Army be, and they hereby are, amended so that", in the Act of July 9, 1918, ch. 143 (8th par. under "Ordnance Department"), 40 Stat. 870, are not contained in 10:1403. They are also omitted from the revised section as surplusage. The word "member" is substituted for the words "officer or enlisted man". The word "only" is omitted as surplusage. The word "award" is inserted for clarity, since the President determines the recipient of the medal in addition to presenting it.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2021—Pub. L. 116–283 inserted "or the Space Force" after "the Air Force" in introductory provisions.

2018—Pub. L. 115–232 renumbered section 8741 of this title as this section.

1963—Pub. L. 88–77 enlarged the authority to award the medal of honor, which was limited to those cases in which persons distinguished themselves in action involving actual conflict with an enemy, to permit its award for distinguished service while engaged in an action against an enemy of the United States, while engaged in military operations involving conflict with an opposing foreign force, or while serving with friendly foreign forces engaged in an armed conflict against an opposing armed force in which the United States is not a belligerent party.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2018 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 115–232 effective Feb. 1, 2019, with provision for the coordination of amendments and special rule for certain redesignations, see section 800 of Pub. L. 115–232, set out as a note preceding section 3001 of this title.
§ 169.304 What happens if BIA does not meet a deadline for issuing a decision on a right-of-way document? ( a ) If a Superintendent does not meet a deadline for granting or denying a right-of-way, renewal, amendment, assignment, or mortgage, the parties may file a written notice to compel action with the appropriate Regional Director.
( b ) The Regional Director has 15 days from receiving the notice to: ( 1 ) Grant or deny the right-of-way; or
( 2 ) Order the Superintendent to grant or deny the right-of-way within the time set out in the order.
( c ) Either party may file a written notice to compel action with the BIA Director if: ( 1 ) The Regional Director does not meet the deadline in paragraph (b) of this section;
( 2 ) The Superintendent does not grant or deny the right-of-way within the time set by the Regional Director under paragraph (b)(2) of this section; or
( 3 ) The initial decision on the right-of-way, renewal, amendment, assignment, or mortgage is with the Regional Director, and he or she does not meet the deadline for such decision.
( d ) The BIA Director has 15 days from receiving the notice to: ( 1 ) Grant or deny the right-of-way; or
( 2 ) Order the Regional Director or Superintendent to grant or deny the right-of-way within the time set out in the order.
( e ) If the Regional Director or Superintendent does not grant or deny the right-of-way within the time set out in the order under paragraph (d)(2) of this section, then the BIA Director must issue a decision within 15 days from the expiration of the time set out in the order.
( f ) The parties may file an appeal from our inaction to the Interior Board of Indian Appeals if the BIA Director does not meet the deadline in paragraph (d) or (e) of this section.
( g ) The provisions of 25 CFR 2.8 do not apply to the inaction of BIA officials with respect to a granting or denying a right-of-way, renewal, amendment, assignment, or mortgage under this subpart.
### §1487. Temporary interment

Whenever necessary for the temporary interment of remains pending transportation under this chapter to a designated cemetery, the Secretary concerned may acquire, and provide for the maintenance of, grave sites in commercial cemeteries, or he may acquire the right to use such grave sites for burial purposes. If the death occurs outside the United States and a temporary commercial grave site is not available on a reasonable basis, the Secretary may acquire land, or the right to use land, necessary for the temporary interment of the remains under this chapter.

(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 115.)

| Revised section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1487 | 5:2159 (as applicable to armed forces). | July 15, 1954, ch. 507, §9 (as applicable to armed forces), 68 Stat. 480. |

The words "as authorized by this chapter, section 103a(c) of this Title, and section 224 of Title 42", "by purchase or otherwise", "care and", and "single or multiple" are omitted as surplusage. The word "continental" is omitted as covered by the definition of "United States" in section 101(1) of this title.
§ 162.547 How must a WSR lease describe the land? ( a ) A WSR lease must describe the leased premises by reference to a private or public survey, if possible. If the land cannot be so described, the lease must include one or more of the following: ( 1 ) A legal description;
( 2 ) A survey-grade global positioning system description; or
( 3 ) Another description prepared by a registered land surveyor that is sufficient to identify the leased premises.
( b ) If the tract is fractionated, we will identify the undivided trust or restricted interests in the leased premises.
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation 

83-4 

January 25, 1983 

REFERENCE: 

 [*1] 4219 Notice & Collection of Withdrawal Liability

4221 Resolution of Disputes 

OPINION: 

 This responds to your inquiry whether the validity of a demand for payment of withdrawal liability is subject to

review and arbitration under Sections 4219(b)(2) and 4221 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974

("ERISA"), as amended by the Multiemployer Pension Plan Amendments Act of 1980, Pub. L. No. 96-364 (1980), 29

U.S.C. § 1399(b)(2), 1401 (Supp. IV 1980). 

You state in your letter that review by the plan sponsor and arbitration of the amount of withdrawal liability would

be "premature" until your client receives a "valid demand" for payment of withdrawal liability. The determination by

the plan sponsor to issue a demand to your client, however, is clearly a "determination made under sections 4201 through

4219." See 29 U.S.C. § 1401(a)(1). 

Your client's disagreement with the plan sponsor over the validity of the demand for withdrawal liability thus creates

a "dispute between an employer and the plan sponsor" within the meaning of 29 U.S.C. § 1401(a)(1). The statute makes

it clear that all such disputes " shall be resolved through arbitration." Id. 

I hope this is of assistance. [*2] If you have further questions concerning this matter, please telephone * * * of my

staff on (202) 254-4895. 

Henry Rose 

General Counsel
EXHIBIT 35.5

OFFICERS CERTIFICATE

I, Karen Montbach, a Managing Director of Citibank, N.A. (the
Company), hereby certify, with respect to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, dated as of December 11, 2011, between CCRE Commercial Mortgage Securities, L.P., as Depositor, Bank of America, National Association, as Master
Servicer, LNR Partners, LLC, as Special Servicer, TriMont Real Estate Advisors, Inc., as Operating Advisor and Citibank, N.A., as Certificate Administrator and Trustee (the Agreement), the following:

1. A review of the Companys activities as Certificate Administrator, Custodian, and Trustee as of and for the period ending
December 31, 2011 and its performance under the Agreement has been made under my supervision.

2. To the best of my
knowledge, based on such review, as of and for the period ending December 31, 2011, the Company has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the reporting period.

This statement is given by the undersigned as an authorized officer of the Company and not in the undersigneds individual capacity.

Date: March 28, 2012



Citibank, N.A.By:

/s/ Karen MontbachName:

Karen MontbachTitle:

Managing Director
### UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

# RECEIVED MAY -5 2014 

## HEAHING DOCKET

In the Matter of: Ridan Investments, Inc., Respondent. ) 

### ) NOTICE OF APPEARANCE ) ) ) 

### ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 

### FAA Docket No. [TBA]
FAA Region: Western-Pacific Judge: Richard C. Goodwin FDMS No. FAA-2012-0911 FAA Case No. 2012S0700133

Pwsuantto**sectio~** 13.33 ofthe Rules ofPractice in FAA Civil Penalty Actions, the, Federal Aviation Administration, hereby designates the following Attorney as counsel in the captioned case: Courtney Adolph;Attorney Office ofthe Regional Counsel, AWP-7.4 P.O.'Box 92007 Los Angeles, CA 90009-2007 Phone (310) 725-7128 Facsimile (310) 725-6816 Email: Courtney.Adolph@faa,gov Respectfully submitted, NAOMITSUDA , · · Regional Counsel· · 1
. "

. Federal Aviation Administratiori Western-Pacific Region
By:

# ~··~·· .•.·· . . . 

## 4**~·**

### ~~u



## eyAdOipi; ·. ,. Attorney :1 'CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certifY that the attached 

### Notice ofAppearance inthe Matter ofRidan Investments, Inc., has been sentto the following parties, via certified mail, return receipt requested, or via facsimile where indicated below. Hon. Richard C. Goodwin U.S. Administrative Law Judge Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) Washington, DB 20590 Attn: Patricia Matthews FAX: 202-366-7536 Lawrence M. Burek (Counsel for the Respondent) 550 NorthParkcenter Drive, Suite 204 SantaAna, CA 92705
Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Ave., S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attn.: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building- Suite 2Wl000 FAX: 202-493-5142

tonia arcia Paralegal, Enforcement Office ofthe Regional Counsel Federal Aviation Administration Lawndale, California 90261
Dated: April14, 2014

2
§ 170.411 What should a long-range transportation plan include? A LRTP should include: ( a ) An evaluation of a full range of transportation modes and connections between modes such as highway, rail, air, and water, to meet transportation needs;
( b ) Trip generation studies, including determination of traffic generators due to land use;
( c ) Social and economic development planning to identify transportation improvements or needs to accommodate existing and proposed land use in a safe and economical fashion;
( d ) Measures that address health and safety concerns relating to transportation improvements;
( e ) A review of the existing and proposed transportation system to identify the relationships between transportation and the environment;
( f ) Cultural preservation planning to identify important issues and develop a transportation plan that is sensitive to Tribal cultural preservation;
( g ) Scenic byway and tourism plans;
( h ) Measures that address energy conservation considerations;
( i ) A prioritized list of short- and long-term transportation needs; and
( j ) An analysis of funding alternatives to implement plan recommendations.
# C_2006215EN.01000101.xml

| 7.9.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 215/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.9.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 215/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

6 September 2006

(2006/C 215/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2793 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 149,23 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4604 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,67910 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,3013 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5844 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 88,90 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,1465 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5763 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 28,238 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 275,40 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6960 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4293 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,9557 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,5194 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,59 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 37,515 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,8737 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6672 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4228 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,9498 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,9732 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0065 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 224,35 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,2334 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 10,1631 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3616 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 625,64 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,6682 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 64,310 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 34,1490 |
| THB | Thai baht | 47,769 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2793

JPY

Japanese yen

149,23

DKK

Danish krone

7,4604

GBP

Pound sterling

0,67910

SEK

Swedish krona

9,3013

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5844

ISK

Iceland króna

88,90

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,1465

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5763

CZK

Czech koruna

28,238

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

275,40

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6960

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4293

PLN

Polish zloty

3,9557

RON

Romanian leu

3,5194

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,59

SKK

Slovak koruna

37,515

TRY

Turkish lira

1,8737

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6672

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4228

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,9498

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,9732

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0065

KRW

South Korean won

1 224,35

ZAR

South African rand

9,2334

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

10,1631

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3616

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 625,64

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,6682

PHP

Philippine peso

64,310

RUB

Russian rouble

34,1490

THB

Thai baht

47,769

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
### Geology and ground-water system in the Gila River Phreatophyte Project area, Graham County, Arizona

By: William G. Weist Jr.

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/pp655D

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 3**                            (pdf) 
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 386 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                     November 18, 1999.
    Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in order to 
consider the conference report to accompany the bill (H.R. 3194) making 
appropriations for the government of the District of Columbia and other 
activities chargeable in whole or in part against revenues of said District for 
the fiscal year ending September 30, 2000, and for other purposes. All points of 
order against the conference report and against its consideration are waived. 
The conference report shall be considered as read. The conference report shall 
be debatable for one hour equally divided and controlled by the chairman and 
ranking minority member of the Committee on Appropriations. The previous 
question shall be considered as ordered on the conference report to final 
adoption without intervening motion except one motion to recommit.
    Sec. 2. Upon adoption of the conference report addressed in the first 
section of this resolution, the House shall be considered to have adopted a 
concurrent resolution consisting of the text printed in section 3.
    Sec. 3. The text of the concurrent resolution addressed in section 2 is as 
follows:
    ``Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), That the 
enrolled copy of the bill (H.R. 2466) making appropriations for the Department 
of the Interior and related agencies for the fiscal year ending September 30, 
2000, and for other purposes, shall not be presented to the President, to the 
end that the bill be, and is hereby, laid on the table.''.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
#### § 166.500 Are there administrative fees for a permit?

Yes. We will charge an administrative fee before approving any permit, subpermit, assignment, encumbrance, modification, or other related document.
IV

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 267

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives with regard to Shuttle

Mission STS–93, commanded by Colonel Eileen Collins, the first female

space shuttle commander.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 29, 1999

Mrs. MORELLA (for herself and Ms. EDDIE BERNICE JOHNSON of Texas) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on

Science

RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives with

regard to Shuttle Mission STS–93, commanded by Colonel Eileen Collins, the first female space shuttle commander.

Whereas Shuttle Mission STS–93 successfully deployed the

Chandra X-Ray Observatory;

Whereas the Chandra X-Ray Observatory will provide scientists from around the world with a better understanding of the structure and evolution of the universe;

Whereas Shuttle Mission STS–93 is the first mission in the

history of the United States space program to be commanded by a woman;
2

•HRES 267 IH

Whereas women continue to be underrepresented in the

science, engineering, and technology fields;

Whereas the selection of Colonel Eileen Collins as the first

female space shuttle commander has raised the level of

awareness and appreciation of women’s contributions in

the advancement of science; and

Whereas Colonel Eileen Collins’ accomplishments in the

United States space program have made her a role model

for women pursuing an education and career in scientific

fields: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives—

2 (1) congratulates the crew of Shuttle Mission

3 STS–93 and honors Colonel Eileen Collins on being

4 the first female commander of a United States space

5 shuttle;

6 (2) recognizes the important contribution Colo7 nel Eileen Collins has made to the United States

8 space program and to the advancement of women in

9 science; and

10 (3) invites Colonel Eileen Collins and the crew

11 of STS–93 to the United States Capitol to be hon12 ored and recognized by the House of Representatives

13 for their achievements.

Æ