alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2013302EN.01001001.xml

| 18.10.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 302/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.10.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 302/10

---

Communication from the Minister for Economic Affairs of the Kingdom of the Netherlands pursuant to Article 3(2) of Directive 94/22/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the conditions for granting and using authorisations for the prospection, exploration and production of hydrocarbons

2013/C 302/08

The Minister for Economic Affairs hereby gives notice that an application has been received for authorisation to prospect for hydrocarbons in a segment of block F14 as indicated on the map appended as Annex 3 to the Mining Regulation (Mijnbouwregeling) (Government Gazette (Staatscourant) 2002, No 245). The area in question has been designated block segment F14-shallow.

With reference to the Directive mentioned in the introduction and Article 15 of the Mining Act (Mijnbouwwet) (Bulletin of Acts and Decrees (Staatsblad) 2002, No 542), the Minister for Economic Affairs hereby invites interested parties to submit a competing application for authorisation to prospect for hydrocarbons in block segment F14-shallow of the Dutch continental shelf.

Block segment F14-shallow contains only rocks from the early Cretaceous and Jurassic periods.

It covers an area of 403 km2.

2

The Minister for Economic Affairs is the competent authority for the granting of authorisations. The criteria, conditions and requirements referred to in Articles 5(1), 5(2) and 6(2) of the above-mentioned Directive are set out in the Mining Act (Bulletin of Acts and Decrees 2002, No 542).

Applications may be submitted during the 13 weeks following the publication of this notice in the Official Journal of the European Union and should be sent to:

Official Journal of the European Union

| The Minister for Economic Affairs |
| --- |
| attn: Mr P. Jongerius, Energy Market Directorate |
| Bezuidenhoutseweg 73 |
| Postbus 20401 |
| 2500 EK Den Haag |
| NEDERLAND |

The Minister for Economic Affairs

attn: Mr P. Jongerius, Energy Market Directorate

Bezuidenhoutseweg 73

Postbus 20401

2500 EK Den Haag

NEDERLAND

Applications received after the expiry of this period will not be considered.

A decision on the applications will be taken not later than 12 months after this period has expired.

Further information can be obtained by calling Mr E. J. Hoppel on the following telephone number: +31 703797762.

---
## IN THE COURT O F CRIMINA L A PPEA LS OF TEXA S NO. WR-36,732-02

EX P ARTE GEORG E OLI VER MCK NIG HT, App licant
ON AP P LICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORP US CAUSE NO. 1149919-A IN THE 177 DISTRICT COURT T H F ROM HARRIS COUNTY
Per curiam . O R D E R Pursuant to the provisions of Ar t i cl e 1 1
. 07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedur e, the cler k of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habea s corpus. Ex parte Y oung , 418 S.W .2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Ap p l i ca nt was convicted of the offense of robber y and sentenc ed to thirty -two year s’ imprisonment. The Four teenth Court of Appea ls aff ir me d his conviction. McKnight v. State , No. 14-08-00770- CR (Tex. App.—Houston [14 Dist.] Dec
. 17, t h 2009) (not desig nated f

or publication). Appli ca n t’s 11.07 application raises nine g rounds for relief and his memorandum of law exceeds fifty pag es. The habe as court found that the memorandum’s leng th rende rs the writapplication non-compli an t and rec ommended dismiss ing. T E X . R. A P P . P. 73.1(d). Howeve r, the

habea s rec ord contains “Applica nt’s Pro Se Motion For Suspension Of Rules,” in which he reque sts leave to exceed the p age limit ation. T E X . R. A P P . P. 73.1(d). It is not clea r if the habea s court considere d Applicant’s motion an d its rec ommendation to dismiss implicitl y reje cts Applicant’s reque st, o r wh et h er the court was unawa re of the m otion. We rema nd this application to the 177 t h District Court of Har

ris County to allow the tri al j u dg e to clar ify the rec ord by either making an expli cit ruling on the motion, or to find that its rec ommendation should be construed as a denial of the motion. This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved this issue, which shall be resolved within 45 day s of this order
. A supplemental transcr ipt shall be forwa rded to this Court within 60 day s of the date of t his order
. Any extensions of t ime shall be obtained f rom this Court.
Filed: June 10, 2015 Do not publish
~~ AMERICAN UNIVERSITY 

WASHINGTON, DC 

DEPARTMENT OF CHEMISTRY 

May 9, 2013 

Wendy Cleland-Hamnett, Director 

Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

1201 Constitution Avenue, N.W. 

Washington, D.C. 20004 

RE: TSCA section 21 Petition 

Dear Wendy: 

Priscilla Flattery phoned me today regarding the petition that I hand delivered to 

Acting Administrator Perciasepe on April 22 last. The petition deals with excess lung and 

bladder cancer cases and their associated treatment costs that arise from the use of 

hydrofluorosilicic acid (HFSA) in water fluoridation systems. 

Priscilla said that because of routing issues within Headquarters the petition 

arrived in your office only today, and that you would appreciate being able to restart the 

90-day clock on an Agency response to the petition. 

By this correspondence, and on behalf of my co-petitioners, I am granting that 

request. Please consider the petition has having been re-submitted on the date above. 

I look forward to working with you and your staff- my former colleagues -

toward lowering the number of cancer cases and medical treatment costs to the public 

that can be achieved by eliniinating the use ofHFSA. 

Best wishes, • 

):W~~ J. William Hirzy, Ph.D. 

COLLEGE OF ARTS AND SCIENCES 

4400 MASSACHUSETTS AVENUE, NW WASHINGTON DC 20016-8014 202-885-1750 FAX: 202-885-1752 

www.american.edu/cas
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

REGION 6 

1445 ROSS AVENUE, SUITE 1200 

DALLAS, TX 75202-2733 

JUN 1 9 2014 

Mr. Michael Teague 

Oklahoma Secretary of Energy & Environment 

100 N. Broadway, Suite 2350 

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73102 

Dear Mr. Teague: 

Thank you for your agency's letter dated February 28, 2014, to the U.S. Environmental Protection 

Agency documenting that the existing Oklahoma State Implementation Plan (SIP) provides for 

implementation, maintenance, and enforcement of the 201 0 national ambient air quality standard for 

nitrogen dioxide. We have determined that the SIP submission titled "Oklahoma's Certification of SIP 

Elements for the 2010 Primary N02 NAAQS under Clean Air Act Sections 11 O(a)(l) and (2)" is 

administratively and technically complete. We appreciate your efforts to address this Clean Air Act 

requirement. 

If you have any questions, please contact me at (214) 665~7100 or Carl Young of my staff at (214) 665~ 

6645. 

cc: Scott Thompson, Executive Director 

Sincerely, 

Wren Stenger 

Director 

Multimedia Planning and 

Permitting Division 

Oklahoma Department of Environmental Quality 

Eddie Terrill, Director 

Oklahoma Department of Environmental Quality, Air Quality Division 

Recycled/Recyclable • Printed with Vegetable 011 Based Inks on 100% Recycled Paper (40".4 Poslconsumer)
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. A. A. White, Appellant, v. James A. Betts, as Justice of the Supreme Court, Holding a Special Term Thereof, Respondent.

Motion denied. Present — Jenks, Hooker, Gaynor, Rich and Miller, JJ.
EXHIBIT 32.2  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of APT Systems, Inc. (the "Company) for the year ended January 31, 2015 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Carl Hussey, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.  Date: June 5, 2015/s/ Carl HusseyCarl HusseyChief Financial Officer
## Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Kenneth Wylie , Appellant

No. 06

- 21

- 00083

- CR v.

The State of Texas , Appellee Appeal from the 4th District Court of Rusk County, Texas (Tr. Ct

. No. CR

- 90

- 001 ). Memorandum Opinion d elivered by Justice Burgess

, Chief Justice Morriss and Justice Stevens participating

.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find that the appeal should be dismissed
for want of jurisdiction . Therefore, we dismiss the appeal.

We note that th e appellant, Kenneth Wylie , has adequately indicated his inability to pay
costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED SEPTEMBER 14, 2 021 BY ORDER OF THE COURT JOSH R. MORRISS, III CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST: Debra K. Autrey , Clerk
#### § 226.30 Lessees subject to Superintendent's orders; books and records open to inspection.

Lessee shall comply with all orders or instructions issued by the Superintendent. The Superintendent or his representative may enter upon the leased premises for the purpose of inspection. Lessee shall keep a full and correct account of all operations, receipts, and disbursements and make reports thereof, as required. Lessee's books and records shall be available to the Superintendent for inspection.
Exhibit 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly  Report of Legend Mobile,  Inc. (the "Company")
on Form  10-QSB  for the  quarter  ending  March  31,  2005 as  filed  with  the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof (the  "Report"),  the
undersigned,  in  the  capacities  and  on  the  date  indicated  below,  hereby
certifies,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

(1)      The report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.

Dated:  June 7, 2005                           By:  /s/ Peter Klamka
                                                   ----------------------------
                                                   Peter Klamka
                                                   Chief Executive and
                                                   Principal Accounting Officer
### **CHAPTER 201—DEFINITIONS**

Subchapter
Sec.
I.
Definitions Relating to Defense Acquisition System Generally
3001
II.
Definitions Applicable to Procurement Generally
3011
III.
Definitions Relating to Major Systems and Major Defense Acquisition Programs
3041

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior chapter 201 "DEFINITIONS", as added by Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, §801(a), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1826, and consisting of reserved section 3001, was repealed by Pub. L. 116–283, div. A, title XVIII, §1806(a)(1), Jan. 1, 2021, 134 Stat. 4151.
Hunton & Williams • LLP Counsel to UWAG • 1900 K Street, N.W. • Washington, D.C. 20006 

Steering/Audit Committee 

Angela M. Grooms, 

Chairman 

C. Richard Bozek 

Rayburn L. Butts 

Alan E. Gaulke 

M. R. (Mick) Greeson 

David M. Lee 

James F. Stine 

John G. Valeri, Esq. 

Kerry M. Whelan 

Judson White 

February 18, 2010 FILE NO.: 29142. 070324 

VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL

Mr. Ronald Jordan 

U. S. EPA 

Engineering & Analysis Division (4303T) 

1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. 

Washington, DC 20460 

RE: Ash Handling Systems Cost List

Dear Ron: 

Thank you for the opportunity to provide information on ash handling systems for the Effluent 

Guidelines ICR. As we have studied types of ash handling systems, their components, and the 

categories of capital costs for those systems, we found many variations. The major variations we 

have identified are reflected in the attachment. For example, dry ash handling systems can be 

broken down into vacuum systems, vacuum-pressure systems, pressure systems, and mechanical 

systems. In addition, there are wet fly ash, wet bottom ash, and wet economizer ash systems. Along 

river systems, dry bottom ash and fly ash barge systems are common. Within these general 

categories, the systems themselves can be quite different. Therefore, we have tried to design an 

insert for the ICR that is flexible and will allow individual respondents to identify different design 

elements, as appropriate. 

We realize that the attachment is quite detailed, but we wanted to provide you with the most 

complete information that we could gather in the time allotted. There may be ways to simplify the 

presentation of the information within the ICR. If you would like to discuss how this might be 

accomplished, please give me a call. 

Given the significance of this issue to the overall rulemaking, we think this issue merits careful 

consideration and focus. As you move forward with revisions to the ICR, let me know if you have 

any questions. 

Sincerely, 

Donna 

Donna B. Hill 

Effluent Guidelines Committee Chairperson

29142.070324 EMF_US 29895250v2
Robert Wessel D/B/A

SKYWAYVISIONS LLC DJI Inspire 1 PRE-FLIGHT CHECK LIST (June 12, 2015)

1. Pre-flight weather checked for daylight VMC conditions with no extreme wind , temperature or precipitation that would jeopardize safety. 2. Flight location is scouted and safe flight area parameters pre-determined including reviewing up to date Sectional and/or TC charts for possible airspace conflicts. 3. Current DJI Firmware confirmed installed. 4. All batteries, remote controllers and tablet devises sufficiently charged for the required mission. 5. Airframe taken out of travel case and confirmed generally clean and free of any dust or debris that could interfere with safe operation. 6. Propellers closely inspected using a magnifying glass if necessary for any damage. If any cracks or dents especially in the leading edges or elsewhere are detected the effected propeller will be replaced with a new one from stock. 7. Propellers correctly installed as specified in the DJI Inspire 1 User Manual and double checked for tightness by the PIC and the camera operator/VO if present. 8. Master Remote controller, tablet, DJI Pilot App and aircraft are powered on . 9. Aircraft is placed on a smooth surface and taken out of travel mode (landing gear down). 10.Aircraft is powered off. 11. Camera gimbal is mounted by the PIC and double checked by the camera operator verifying that the SD card and any necessary lens filters are correctly installed. If not previously accomplished the lens should be cleaned with lens cleaning fluid and lens tissue. 12.Aircraft should be set horizontally and powered on. 13. Compass calibration as specified in DJI Inspire 1 User’s Manual. 14. Radio frequency verified in DJI Inspire Pilot App 15. GPS signal lock-on and signal strength verified in DJI Inspire 1 Pilot App 16. Proper flight mode “Safe To Fly” is verified in the DJI Inspire Pilot App and on the Master remote switch as specified in the DJI Inspire User’s Manual. 17. Home point entered in DJI Pilot App . 18. Maximum altitude set to 400 feet and maximum distance as required in DJI Pilot App. 19. Camera operator verifies gimbal and camera operational. 20.Aircraft is positioned on clear level take-off area safely clear of any persons or objects . 21. Motors are powered on and aircraft observed for any abnormal vibrations or sounds. 22. PIC determines the aircraft and surrounding area is safe for take-off and notifies the camera operator/VO if present. 23. Camera operator verifies video is recording. 24.After takeoff PIC verifies the landing gear is raised and aircraft is hovered at a reasonable altitude to check all flight controls are functioning correctly. Aircraft will be landed immediately and mission terminated if any abnormalities are detected.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Employers & Practitioners 
-  Interest Rates & Factors 
-  Late Premium Payment Interest Charges 

This page has not been translated. Please go to PBGC.gov's Spanish home page for more information available in Spanish.

Esta página no ha sido traducida. Por favor vaya a la página principal del sitio de español de PBGC para ver información disponible en español.

# Late Premium Payment Interest Charges

March 13, 2024

ERISA section 4006 provides that interest on late PBGC premiums accrue at the rate imposed under section 6601(a) of the Code (the rate for late payment of taxes), compounded daily.  These rates are published by the IRS and are subject to change quarterly.

The same rates are also used to compute certain interest charges applicable when PBGC trustees a plan (e.g., interest on required contributions unpaid as of the termination date).

**NOTE:**
                          - In addition to interest charges on late premium payments, penalty charges may also apply. See our  Late Payment Charges  web page for more information.
                          - Prior to 1983, simple interest applied.
                          - Prior to 1987, IRS published these rates less frequently than quarterly.

2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001  | 2000 | 1999 | 1998 | 1997 | 1996 | 1995 | 1994 | 1993 | 1992 | 1991 | 1990 | 1989 | 1988 | Dec. 1987 - Jan. 1986 | 1985 | Dec. 1984 - Jan. 1983 | Feb. - Dec. 1982 | Jan. 1982 - Feb. 1980 | Jan. 1980 - Feb. 1978 | Jan. 1978 - Feb. 1976 | Jan. 1976 - July 1975 | June 1975 - Sept. 1974

 

## 2024

## 2023

## 2022

## 2021

## 2020

## 2019

 

## 2018

 

## 2017

 

## 2016

 

## 2015

 

## 2014

 

## 2013

 

## 2012

 

## 2011

 

## 2010

 

## 2009

 

## 2008

 

## 2007

 

## 2006

 

## 2005

 

## 2004

 

## 2003

 

## 2002

 

## 2001

 

## 2000

 

## 1999

 

## 1998

 

## 1997

 

## 1996

 

## 1995

 

## 1994

 

## 1993

 

## 1992

 

## 1991

 

## 1990

 

## 1989

 

## 1988

 

## Dec. 1987 - Jan. 1986

 

## 1985

 

## Dec. 1984 - Jan. 1983

 

## Feb. - Dec. 1982

 

## Jan. 1982 - Feb. 1980

 

## Jan. 1980 - Feb. 1978

 

## Jan. 1978 - Feb. 1976

 

## Jan. 1976 - July 1975

 

## June 1975 - Sept. 1974
**Exhibit 99.4**

 

**PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

In connection with this Annual Report of Sprott Physical Platinum and Palladium Trust (the “Trust”) on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2014 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) on or about the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Steven Rostowsky, Principal Financial Officer of Sprott Asset Management LP, the Manager of the Trust, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.

 

This certification is made solely for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and not for any other purpose.  A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Trust and will be retained by the Trust and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.

 

Date: March 30, 2015

 

 
|   | /s/   Steven Rostowsky        |
|--------|-------------------------------|
|   | Steven   Rostowsky            |
|   | Principal   Financial Officer |

 

----
---

CONSENT OF BRUCE DAVIS

I hereby consent to the inclusion in this Annual Report on Form
10-K, which is being filed with the United States Securities and Exchange
Commission, of references to my name and to the use of the technical report
titled Technical Report for the Bornite Deposit, South Reef and Ruby Creek
zones, Northwest Alaska, USA, dated effective January 31, 2013 (the Technical
Report).

I also consent to the incorporation by reference in NovaCopper
Inc.s Registration Statement (No. 333-185127) on Form S-3 and Registration
Statement (No. 333-181020) on Form S-8, of references to my name and to the use
of the Technical Report, which is included in the Annual Report on Form
10-K.

|DATED: February
      12, 2013 | 
|------------------------------ | 
|                               | 
|                               | 
|/s/ Bruce Davis                | 
|Name: Bruce Davis              | 

---
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 UNITED STATES CODE SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Eric J. Pulaski, Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and President
of BindView Development Corporation (the "Company"), certify that (i) the
Company's Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2003 fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 and (ii) the information contained in the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
September 30, 2003 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and the results of operations of the Company.


By        /s/ ERIC J. PULASKI
          ----------------------------------------
          Eric J. Pulaski
          Chairman of the Board, Chief
          Executive Officer and President
          November 13, 2003


         A signed original of the foregoing certification has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
The Supreme Court of Texas

Post Office Box 12248

Austin, Texas 78711

Telephone: (512) 463-1312

FACSIMILE

**TO:OF:FAX NO.:**

Honorable Anne AshbyJudge, 134th District Court214-653-6988   

Mr. Eric Gordon WalravenGodwin Papps Langley Gruber, LLP214-760-7332    

Mr. Christopher A. PayneLaw Offices of Christopher A. Payne972-392-1324

Ms. Lisa MatzClerk, Fifth Court of Appeals214-745-1083

**FROM:**Clerk’s Office

**DATE:**March 28, 2006

**PAGES:**(4), including cover page

**RE:**Case Number: **06-0239; *In Re  Mariner Health Care of Nashville Inc., individually and/or d/b/a Mariner Health of North Dallas***

**COMMENTS:**The attached order was issued this date.

If you have any questions, please call.  Thank you.

*IF YOU DO NOT RECEIVE ALL PAGES, PLEASE TELEPHONE THE CLERK’S OFFICE IMMEDIATELY.