alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## Breadcrumb

-  Inicio 
-  Impacto de La Decisión de La Corte Suprema Sobre El Matri... 

This page has not been translated. Please go to PBGC.gov’s English home page for more information available in English.

# Impacto de la decisión de la Corte Suprema sobre el matrimonio entre personas del mismo sexo a los beneficios de PBGC

En junio 26 del 2013, la Corte Suprema de los Estados Unidos declaró que la sección 3 de la Ley de Defensa del Matrimonio (DOMA, siglas en inglés) era inconstitucional. La sección 3 de DOMA disponía que, al interpretar cualquier ley federal, un "matrimonio" se limitaba a "una unión legal de un hombre y una mujer como esposo y esposa" y un "cónyuge" (“spouse” en inglés) era sólo "una persona del sexo opuesto que es un esposo o una esposa". Como resultado de la decisión de la Corte Suprema, estas definiciones ya no son un factor en las determinaciones de los beneficios de PBGC.

Las normas de PBGC desde hace tiempo son para determinar el estado civil de una persona mirando las leyes del "lugar de celebración" - lo que significa que mientras un matrimonio fue válido donde tuvo lugar, es válido para los propósitos de PBGC. Por lo tanto, PBGC lo tratará como casado/a si su matrimonio era válido en el lugar donde ocurrió, sin importar las leyes del estado en el que vive ahora. Esta regla se aplica tanto a los matrimonios del sexo opuesto como a los del mismo sexo.

Si usted es el cónyuge de un participante en un plan de pensión, por lo general tiene derecho a beneficios de sobreviviente a menos que renuncie a ellos por escrito. Estos incluyen una Anualidad Calificada de Prejubilación para el Sobreviviente (QPSA, siglas en inglés) y un beneficio bajo una Anualidad Calificada Conjunta y de Sobreviviente (QJSA, siglas en inglés). Además, un cónyuge divorciado puede tener derecho a obtener una Orden Calificada de Relaciones Domésticas (QDRO, siglas en inglés), en la que se otorga una parte de la prestación del participante a ese ex cónyuge. Consulte el Glosario para obtener más detalles.

Si tiene preguntas sobre cómo se aplican las reglas en su situación específica, llame al centro de contacto del cliente de PBGC al 1-800-400-7242 para obtener más información.

Septiembre 11, 2020

Déjenos sus comentarios
§ 214.3 Corporate information. A corporation shall file with its first lease a certified copy of articles of incorporation, and, if a foreign corporation, evidence showing compliance with local corporation laws in duplicate; a list of all stockholders, with their post office addresses, and showing the number of shares of capital stock held by each; together with a sworn statement of its proper officer showing: ( a ) The total number of shares of the capital stock actually issued, the number of shares actually sold and the amount of cash paid into the treasury out of the stock sold, or, if paid in property, kind, quantity, and value of the same.
( b ) Of the stock sold, how much per share remains unpaid and subject to assessment.
( c ) How much cash the company has in its treasury and elsewhere, and from what source it was received.
( d ) What property, exclusive of cash, is owned by the company, and its value.
( e ) What the total indebtedness of the company is, and the nature of its obligations.
( f ) Names of officers and directors.
### §12501. Reserve components: detail of members of regular and reserve components to assist

The Secretary concerned shall detail such members of the regular and reserve components under his jurisdiction as are necessary to effectively develop, train, instruct, and administer those reserve components.

(Added Pub. L. 103–337, div. A, title XVI, §1662(g)(1), Oct. 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 2995.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

Provisions similar to those in this section were contained in section 715 of this title, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 103–337, §1662(g)(2).

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Dec. 1, 1994, except as otherwise provided, see section 1691 of Pub. L. 103–337, set out as a note under section 10001 of this title.
#### § 20.329 When can the Bureau provide Emergency Assistance payments?

Emergency Assistance payments can be provided to individuals or families who suffer from a burnout, flood, or other destruction of their home and loss or damage to personal possessions. The Bureau will make payments only for essential needs and other non-medical necessities.
§ 162.571 What are the consent requirements for an amendment to a WSR lease? ( a ) Unless the lease provides otherwise, the lessee must notify all Indian landowners of the proposed amendment.
( b ) The Indian landowners, or their representatives under § 162.013, must consent to an amendment of a WSR lease in the same percentages and manner as a new WSR lease under § 162.012, unless the lease: ( 1 ) Provides that individual Indian landowners are deemed to have consented if they do not object in writing to the amendment within a specified period of time following the landowners' receipt of the amendment and the lease meets the requirements of paragraph (c) of this section;
( 2 ) Authorizes one or more representatives to consent to an amendment on behalf of all Indian landowners; or
( 3 ) Designates us as the Indian landowners' representative for the purposes of consenting to an amendment.
( c ) If the lease provides for deemed consent under paragraph (b)(1) of this section, it must require the parties to submit to us: ( 1 ) A copy of the executed amendment or other documentation of any Indian landowners' actual consent;
( 2 ) Proof of mailing of the amendment to any Indian landowners who are deemed to have consented; and
( 3 ) Any other pertinent information for review.
( d ) Unless specifically authorized in the lease, a written power of attorney, or a court document, Indian landowners may not be deemed to have consented to, and an Indian landowner's designated representative may not negotiate or consent to, an amendment that would: ( 1 ) Reduce the payment obligations to the Indian landowners;
( 2 ) Increase or decrease the lease area;
( 3 ) Terminate or change the term of the lease; or
( 4 ) Modify dispute resolution procedures.
# C_2006210EN.01004502.xml

| 1.9.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 210/45 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.9.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 210/45

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4173 — Nippon Sheet Glas/Pilkington)

(2006/C 210/10)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 7 June 2006, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4173. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://ec.europa.eu/eur-lex/lex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4173. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://ec.europa.eu/eur-lex/lex)

---
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Pacific Fleet Holds Military Maritime Consultative Agreement Talks, Enhances Cooperation with PLA

By MC2 Tamara Vaughn, U.S. Pacific Fleet Public Affairs

**PEARL HARBOR** — Military representatives from U.S. Pacific Fleet (PACFLT), U.S. Pacific Air Forces and the People’s Republic of China (PRC) People’s Liberation Army Navy and Air Force met for recurring consultations to improve coordination on maritime issues and safety at Ford Island, May 24-25.

The overall goal of the two-day talks, known as the Military Maritime Consultative Agreement (MMCA), is to strengthen ties through open communication between U.S. and PRC naval and air forces and to improve operational safety in the air and maritime environments.

“Engagements like the Military Maritime Consultative Agreement help the U.S. and Chinese militaries work towards common goals while also candidly addressing differences,” said Capt. Donald Cribbs, head of International Plans and Policy for PACFLT. “This dialogue helps both sides reduce the likelihood of incidents at sea and in the air.”

The MMCA was established by the Department of Defense and the PRC Ministry of National Defense January 1998 as an instrument to promote common understanding and mutual respect. The agreement was designed to prevent incidents and strengthen regional safety for U.S. and PRC maritime and air forces operating in accordance with international law. The last MMCA meeting was held at the U.S. Pacific Air Forces Headquarters November 2015.

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More Articles/News
#### § 227.27 Stipulations.

The lessee under any lease heretofore executed may be stipulation (Form 5-154i), with the consent of the lessor, make such lease subject to all the terms, conditions, and provisions contained in the lease form currently in use. Stipulations shall be filed with the superintendent within 20 days after the date of execution.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Surface Transportation Board

The Surface Transportation Board has received a request from Neville Peterson LLP on behalf of Trinity Industries, Inc. (WB605-8-12/20/11) for permission to use certain data from the Board's 2009 Carload Waybill Sample. A copy of this request may be obtained from the Office of Economics.

The waybill sample contains confidential railroad and shipper data; therefore, if any parties object to these requests, they should file their objections with the Director of the Board's Office of Economics within 14 calendar days of the date of this notice. The rules for release of waybill data are codified at 49 CFR 1244.9.

*Contact:*                     Scott Decker, (202) 245-0330.                

Jeffrey Herzig,

Clearance Clerk.

[FR Doc. 2011-33820 Filed 1-4-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4915-01-P
#### § 214.28 Location of sites for mines and buildings.

In event of disagreement between two or more mineral lessees regarding sites for the location of wells, mines, buildings, plants, etc., the same shall be determined by the superintendent after investigation and after due consideration of prior right of any lessee by reason of date of approval of lease.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

September 12, 2016

No. 04-16-00497-CR

IN RE Juan Robert RODRIGUEZ

Original Mandamus Proceeding1

ORDER

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

Karen Angelini, Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

On August 8, 2016, Relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus, contending the trial 

court has not ruled on a motion dated March 27, 2016 which he filed in the trial. This court is of 

the opinion that a serious question concerning the mandamus relief sought requires further 

consideration. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(b). The respondent and the real parties in interest 

may file a response to the petition in this court no later than September 27, 2016. Any such 

response must conform to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 52.4. 

It is so ORDERED on September 12, 2016.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO: ______________________________

 Keith E. Hottle, Clerk 

 

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 1990CR1294, styled The State of Texas v. Juan Roberto Rodriguez, 

pending in the 227th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Kevin M. O'Connell presiding.
EX-34.1
(logo) pwc

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Board of Directors of Bank of America, National Association:

We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying Assessment
Regarding Compliance with Applicable Servicing Criteria (the "Compliance
Statement"), that Bank of America, National Association (the "Company") complied
with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and
Exchange Commission's Regulation AB in connection with the asset-backed
securities transactions listed in Appendix B to the Compliance Statement,
involving commercial mortgage loan transactions that involved an offer or sale
of asset-backed securities that were required to be registered on or after
January 1, 2006 with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the
Securities Act of 1933 (the "Platform"), as of the dates listed in Appendix B to
the Compliance Statement and for the periods then ended (the "Reporting
Period"), excluding the criteria which the Company has determined are not
applicable to the servicing activities performed by them with respect to the
Platform, as indicated in Appendix A to the Compliance Statement. Management is
responsible for the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion based on our
examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly,
included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance
with the applicable servicing criteria and performing such other procedures as
we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing
of selected asset-backed securities transactions that comprise the Platform,
testing of selected servicing activities related to the Platform, and
determining whether the Company processed those selected transactions and
performed those selected activities in compliance with the applicable servicing
criteria. Our procedures were limited to the selected transactions and servicing
activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report.
Our procedures were not designed to detect noncompliance arising from
errors that may have occurred prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have
affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during
the period covered by this report. We believe that our examination provides a
reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal
determination on the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria.

In our opinion, management's assertion that Bank of America, National
Association complied with the aforementioned applicable servicing criteria as
of and for the Reporting Period for the Platform is fairly stated, in all
material respects.


/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
February 28, 2014


PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, 214 N. Tryon Street, Charlotte, NC 28202
T: (704) 344 7500, F: (704) 344 4100, www.pwc.com/us
IV

★

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 346

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that ‘‘Family Hour’’,

the time period between 8 p.m. and 9 p.m., should be set aside by

the television industry for family-oriented programming.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 28, 1999

Ms. BROWN of Florida submitted the following resolution; which was referred

to the Committee on Commerce

RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that

‘‘Family Hour’’, the time period between 8 p.m. and

9 p.m., should be set aside by the television industry

for family-oriented programming.

Whereas in 1998, A.C. Nielsen Co. conducted a study of television viewing patterns of American families;

Whereas according to the study, American children watch an

average of 3 to 4 hours of television daily;

Whereas American children between the ages of 2 and 11

watch 1,197 minutes of television per week;

Whereas 52 percent of children ages 5 to 17 have a television

set in their bedroom;
2

HRES 346 IH1S

Whereas American children will have seen 200,000 acts of violence on television by the age of 18;

Whereas parents spend only 38.5 minutes per week engaged

in meaningful conversation with their children;

Whereas 80 percent of Hollywood executives believe there is

a link between television violence and real life-violence;

Whereas television violence is a significant contributor to aggressive behavior among children;

Whereas violent content, foul language, and sexual content

combined have risen almost 31 percent since November

1996; and

Whereas parental concern about sex and violence on television

has never been higher than at present: Now, therefore, be

it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That it is the sense of the House of Rep3 resentatives that ‘‘Family Hour’’, the time period between

4 8 p.m. and 9 p.m., should be set aside by the television

5 industry for family-oriented programming.

Æ
#### § 151.1 What is the purpose of this part?

This part sets forth the authorities, policies, and procedures governing the acquisition of land by the United States in trust status for individual Indians and Tribes. This part does not cover acquisition of land by individual Indians and Tribes in fee simple status even though such land may, by operation of law, be held in restricted status following acquisition; acquisition of land mandated by Federal law; acquisition of land in trust status by inheritance or escheat; or transfers of land into restricted fee status unless required by Federal law.
# C_2006212EN.01005001.xml

| 2.9.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 212/50 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.9.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 212/50

---

(2006/C 212/88)

Last publication of the Court of Justice in the Official Journal of the European Union

Official Journal of the European Union

OJ C 190, 12.8.2006

OJ C 190, 12.8.2006

Past publications

OJ C 178, 29.7.2006

OJ C 165, 15.7.2006

OJ C 154, 1.7.2006

OJ C 143, 17.6.2006

OJ C 131, 3.6.2006

OJ C 121, 20.5.2006

These texts are available on:

| | EUR-Lex:http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex |
| --- | --- |

EUR-Lex:http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex

| | CELEX:http://europa.eu.int/celex |
| --- | --- |

CELEX:http://europa.eu.int/celex

---
#### Christine Jonssan, Respondent, v. Brooklyn, Queens County and Suburban Railroad Company, Appellant.

Judgment and order reversed and new trial granted, costs to abide the event, unless within twenty days plaintiff stipulate to reduce recovery of damages to the sum of §350, with costs, in which case the judgment as modified and the order are unanimously affirmed, without costs. Ho opinion. Woodward, Jenks, Hooker, Gaynor and Miller, JJ., concurred.
COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

MANDATE RECEIPT ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

Monday, January 05, 2015

Case Number WR-82,410-01

WEIR, COLTON

COA No. 12-06-408-CR Tr. Ct. No. F13667-2006-A

Nacogdoches County, 420th District Court

Pursuant to Rule 51.2(a)(1) T.R.A.P, I,

hereby acknowledge receipt of the mandate oT the Court of Criminal

Appeals on Af/»*/-*• in the above numbered and styled case.

PLEASE RETURN UPON RECEIPT

ATTN: ABEL ACOSTA
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-40255

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

PEDRO RAMIREZ-SOTO,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 7:12-CR-1755-1

Before DAVIS, DENNIS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Pedro Ramirez-Soto 

(Ramirez) has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance 

with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 

F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Ramirez has not filed a response. We have reviewed 

counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We 

concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

December 17, 2013

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 

 Case: 13-40255 Document: 00512473790 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/17/2013
No. 13-40255

issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw 

is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the 

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

2

 Case: 13-40255 Document: 00512473790 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/17/2013