alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 9930.

#### The State ex rel. F. Lamarque vs. L. A. Burthe, Recorder.

A defendant, prosecuted for tlie violation of a municipal ordinance subjecting Mm to a fine, and in default of payment to imprisonment — who, on arraignment, pleads guilty, and on judgment voluntarily pays the fine, is not entitled to an appeal

Where a discrepancy exists between the return of a judge and the statement of a relator, credence will be given in preference to the return.

. The refusal to allow an appeal is justified unnder the circumstances, and no mandamus will issue to compel the granting of any.

PPLICATION for Mandamus.

*Belden <& Armbruster*for the Relator.

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

*329Bermudez, C. J.

This is an application for a *mandamus*to compel the granting of a suspensive appeal.

The relator charges that he was arrested for violation of an ordinance of this city, bearing No. 4798, A. S., prohibiting private markets within a certain radius from a public market; that he pleaded that the ordinance had been repealed by the present city charter; that he was nevertheless fined $25 and sentenced to imprisonment during thirty days in ease of non-payment; that he has applied for a suspensive appeal, which was refused him.

He prayed for an alternative *mandamus*and a restraining order, which were both allowed.

The recorder returns that the defendant on arraignment pleaded “guilty,” and upon judgment being rendered, as stated, that he promptly *paid*the fine imposed.

Since the case was submitted, the relator has filed an *affidavit,*traversing the recorder’s return, to the effect that he did not plead guilty, but that the recorder so inferred or deduced from his confession or admission of having committed the act charged as done in violation of the municipal ordinance.

This *affidavit*ought not to have been filed. It came too late. Conceding to it, however, whatever effect it might be otherwise entitled to, we have no hesitation to say that it is a settled rule in such cases of contradictory statements to give credence rather to the return of the magistrate.

But even then, the relator does not pretend to deny the material fact that he has promptly paid the fine imposed by the recorder, or explain the circumstances under which he did so.

The payment made without qualification must be viewed as made voluntarily. C. P. 507.

Under such circumstances the relator must be denied the right of appeal.

It is therefore decreed that the restraining order herein made be rescinded, and that the application for a *mandamus*be refused with costs.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
financial statements as of and for the nine months ended September 30, 2000. You
should read the financial statements in their entirety for a full explanation of
this summary financial information. (All data is expressed in thousands, except
EPS).
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000
<CURRENCY>                                     US DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         1,231
<SECURITIES>                                   2,398
<RECEIVABLES>                                  4,387
<ALLOWANCES>                                   531
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               8,086
<PP&E>                                         3,888
<DEPRECIATION>                                 495
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 34,996
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          4,720
<BONDS>                                        271
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       58,186
<OTHER-SE>                                    (28,182)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   34,996
<SALES>                                        3,760
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               303
<CGS>                                          1,797
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               5,723
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               511
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             323
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (6,647)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (6,647)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (0.19)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0



</TABLE>
###### Editorial Note on Part 23

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 23 appear at 79 FR 27190, May 13, 2014.

#### § 23.1 Purpose.

The purpose of the regulations in this part is to govern the provision of funding for, and the administration of Indian child and family service programs as authorized by the Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978 (Pub. L. 95-608, 92 Stat. 3069, 25 U.S.C. 2, 9, 1901-1952).
<PAGE>

Exhibit 32

                                 CERTIFICATION

      We, Roy G. Warren, Chief Executive Officer and Tommy Kee, Chief Accounting
Officer, of Bravo! Foods International Corp. (the "Company"), certify, pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

      1. The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB (amendment one)of the Company for
the quarter ended March 31, 2006 (the "Report") fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
78m); and

      2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: October 2, 2006

[Signature]
Roy G. Warren
Chief Executive Officer

[Signature]
Tommy E. Kee
Chief Accounting Officer
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News

USS Halsey Visits Thailand During Deployment December 23, 2014 — The crew of the guided-missile destroyer USS Halsey (DDG 97) arrived in Laem Chabang, Thailand, Dec. 22, to enjoy a port visit during the holiday season."This visit gives Halsey Sailors the... MORE 

----

2024 (327)2023 (825)2022 (1193)2021 (1066)2020 (1083)2019 (1166)2018 (1116)2017 (1356)2016 (1475)2015 (1408)2014 (904)2013 (32)2012 (4)

About DoDDoD CareersJoin the MilitaryNewsUSA.govPhotos & VideosPrivacy & SecurityTop Issues

US INDOPACOM Inspector GeneralDoD Inspector General Accessibility/Section 508DoD FOIAUS INDOPACOM FOIALink DisclaimerNo FEAR ActRecovery ActINDOPACOM Webmaster

                  - Facebook
                  - X
                  - YouTube
                  - Instagram
                  - RSS

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
Good Neighbor Environmental Board

JW Marriott Washington DC

1331 Pennsylvania Avenue NW

Washington, DC 20004

202-393-2000

AGENDA

Wednesday, December 14

8:30 a.m. Registration

9:00-9:30 Welcome and Introductions

 Mark Joyce

Associate Director and GNEB Acting Designated Federal Officer

 Cynthia Jones-Jackson

Acting Director

U.S. EPA Office of Federal Advisory Committee Management and Outreach

 Diane Austin

Chair

Good Neighbor Environmental Board

 Board Members and Speakers

9:30-9:45 Overview of Agenda

Diane Austin

Chair

Good Neighbor Environmental Board

9:45-10:45 Major Border Environment Cooperation Commission and North American 

Development Bank Initiatives

Maria Elena Giner

General Manager

Border Environment Cooperation Commission
10:45-11:00 Break

11:00-12:00 Update on Border 2012/2020 Activities and Border Issues

Michelle DePass

Assistant Administrator

U.S. EPA Office of International and Tribal Affairs

Keith Takata

Deputy Regional Administrator

U.S. EPA Region 9

12:00-12:15 Public Comments

12:30-4:30 Press Event at the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars

5:00-6:00 Board Member Updates and Discussion with Senior Officials from EPA

Meeting Day 2

December 15, 2011

8:00 a.m. Registration

8:30-10:00 Discussion of GNEB’s 15th Report and Activities for the Coming Year

10:00-10:15 Break

10:15-12:00 Continuation of Discussion

12:00-12:15 Break

12:15-1:30 Continuation of Discussion

1:30-2:00 Public Comments

2:00 Adjourn
August 28 , 2015

Mr. Jerry Bruce 511 Lake Winnebago Lane Boulder City, NV 89006

Dear Mr. Br uce :

This is in response to your March 12, 2015

, letter sent to the docket ( No. FAA

- 201 5

- 0640 ) petitioning the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) for an exemption from Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations ( 14 CFR)

. You requested to conduct aerial vide ography, photography

, and cinematography using an unmanned aerial system

.

The information you submitted did not comply with the requirements of 14 CFR 11.81. On June 24, 2015 , the FAA sent you a letter stating that we were unable to process your request

w ithout further information. Specifically, we asked you t o provide the following:

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief and the extent of the relief you seek.

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public inte rest; that is, how it would benefit the public as a whole.

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you seek an exemption.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

On July 9, 2015 , the FAA received additional information. The FAA has reviewed the information and finds that you did not provide the sections from which you seek relief an d why granting the request would be in the public interest.2

Because your petition lacks sufficient information to proceed, the FAA has close d your exemption request. Should you wish to provide the additional information please resubmit your petition for exemption to the public docket.

Sincerely,

/s/

Lirio Liu

Director

, Office of Rulemaking
(logo)Rialto 

         CAPITAL

 

 

**2017 AnnualStatement of Servicer Compliance (Item 1123)** 

 

 

Poolingand Servicing Agreement (the “Pooling and Servicing Agreement”) dated asof  February 1, 2012 by and among GS Mortgage Securities Corporation II,as Depositor, KeyCorp Real Estate Capital Markets, Inc. as Master Servicer,Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC as successor Special Servicer to CWCapital AssetManagement LLC,  Wells Fargo Bank, National Association as Trustee andCustodian, TriMont Real Estate Advisors, Inc., as Operating Advisor relating tothe GS Mortgage Securities Trust 2012-GC6, Commercial Mortgage Pass-ThroughCertificates, Series 2012-GC6 **(GSMS 2012-GC6)**

 

Theundersigned, a duly authorized officer of Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, asspecial servicer (the “Special Servicer”) herein certifies to the following:

 

1.     Allservicing activities and performance of such servicing activities under thePooling and Servicing Agreement are performed on behalf of the SpecialServicer.

 

2.     Areview of the servicing activities and performance by the Special Servicer forthe period of January 1, 2017 to December 31, 2017 (the “Reporting Period”) inaccordance with the Pooling and Servicing Agreement has been conducted under mysupervision.

 

3.     Tothe best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Special Servicer hasfulfilled all of its obligations under the terms of the Pooling and ServicingAgreement, in all material respects for the Reporting Period and if there hasbeen a failure to fulfill any such obligations in any material respect, eachfailure and the nature and status thereof has been specifically identifiedherein.

 

 

Certifiedby: /s/ AdamSinger                                                                             Date: March 1, 2018

AdamSinger, Managing Director
#### Dunnie Lai, Appellant, et al., Plaintiffs, v H.J. Gartlan, Jr., et al., Defendants, and Ricky Leung et al., Respondents.

[824 NYS2d 40]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Charles E. Ramos, J.), entered June 30, 2006, which granted defendants-respondents’ motion to enforce their settlement agreement with plaintiffs, and directed payment of the settlement amount within a specified period of time, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

We reject plaintiff-appellant’s argument that payment of the settlement amount is contingent on an accounting that is not mentioned in the settlement agreement. Defendants-respondents are entitled to prompt payment of the settlement amount (CPLR 5003-a [a]). Concur—Buckley, EJ., Tom, Mazzarelli, Saxe and McGuire, JJ.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 473 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                 House Calendar No. 205
106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 473

                          [Report No. 106-576]

 Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 4199) to terminate the 
                     Internal Revenue Code of 1986.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 12, 2000

    Mr. Linder, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 4199) to terminate the 
                     Internal Revenue Code of 1986.

    Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it shall be in 
order to consider in the House the bill (H.R. 4199) to terminate the 
Internal Revenue Code of 1986. The bill shall be considered as read for 
amendment. An amendment in the nature of a substitute consisting of the 
text of H.R. 4230 shall be considered as adopted. The previous question 
shall be considered as ordered on the bill, as amended, to final 
passage without intervening motion except: (1) one hour of debate on 
the bill, as amended, equally divided and controlled by the chairman 
and ranking minority member of the Committee on Ways and Means; and (2) 
one motion to recommit with or without instructions.
                                     

                                                 House Calendar No. 205

106th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                              H. RES. 473

                          [Report No. 106-576]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 4199) to terminate the 
                     Internal Revenue Code of 1986.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             April 12, 2000

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Office of the Secretary

                    The following Applications for Certificates of Public Convenience and Necessity and Foreign Air Carrier Permits were filed under Subpart B (formerly Subpart Q) of the Department of Transportation's Procedural Regulations (                    *See*14 CFR 301.201*et seq.*). The due date for Answers, Conforming Applications, or Motions to Modify Scope are set forth below for each application. Following the Answer period DOT may process the application by expedited procedures. Such procedures may consist of the adoption of a show-cause order, a tentative order, or in appropriate cases a final order without further proceedings.                

*Docket Number:*                     DOT-OST-1999-5140.                

*Date Filed:*                     December 30, 2010.                

*Due Date for Answers, Conforming Applications, or Motion to Modify Scope:*                     January 20, 2011.                

*Description:*                     Application of Arrow Air, Inc. d/b/a Arrow Air requesting to change the name in which its operating authority has been issued to: Alpha Cargo Airlines, Inc., d/b/a Alpha Cargo, and for reissuance of its certificate of public convenience and necessity in that name.                

Renee V. Wright,

 Program Manager, Docket Operations, Federal Register Liaison.

[FR Doc. 2011-3978 Filed 2-22-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-9X-P
# C_2017443EN.01008801.xml

| 22.12.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 443/88 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.12.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 443/88

---

P7_TA(2014)0396

Voting in the context of procedures concerning the immunity of Members (interpretation of the Rules of Procedure)

European Parliament decision of 15 April 2014 concerning voting in the context of procedures concerning the immunity of Members (interpretation of Rules 166, 167(1) and 195(3)) (2014/2028(REG)

(2017/C 443/19)

The European Parliament,

The European Parliament,

| — | having regard to the letter of 9 April 2014 from the Chair of the Committee on Constitutional Affairs, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the letter of 9 April 2014 from the Chair of the Committee on Constitutional Affairs,

| — | having regard to Rule 211 of its Rules of Procedure, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Rule 211 of its Rules of Procedure,

| 1. | Decides to append the following interpretation to Rules 166, 167(1) and 195(3):
  ‘Rule 166, Rule 167(1) and Rule 195(3) on voting by roll call do not apply to the reports provided for in Rule 6b(2) and Rule 7(3), (6) and (8) in the context of procedures relating to the immunity of a Member.’ |
| --- | --- |

1.

Decides to append the following interpretation to Rules 166, 167(1) and 195(3):

‘Rule 166, Rule 167(1) and Rule 195(3) on voting by roll call do not apply to the reports provided for in Rule 6b(2) and Rule 7(3), (6) and (8) in the context of procedures relating to the immunity of a Member.’

| 2. | Instructs its President to forward this decision to the Council and the Commission, for information. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Instructs its President to forward this decision to the Council and the Commission, for information.

---
§ 2.600 May I compel an agency official to take action? ( a ) Yes. If a decision-maker fails to take action on a written request for action that you believe the decision-maker is required to take, you may make the decision-maker's inaction the subject of appeal.
( b ) Before filing an appeal with the next official in the decision-maker's chain of command, you must: ( 1 ) Send a written request to the decision-maker, asking that he or she take the action originally asked of him or her;
( 2 ) Identify the statute, regulation, or other source of law that you believe requires the decision-maker to take the action being requested;
( 3 ) Describe the interest adversely affected by the decision-maker's inaction, including a description of the loss, impairment or impediment of such interest caused by the inaction; and
( 4 ) State that, unless the decision-maker either takes action on the written request within 15 days of receipt of your request, or establishes a date by which a decision will be made, you will appeal the decision-maker's inaction in accordance with this subpart.
( c ) You must include a copy of your original request to the decision-maker, or other documentation establishing the date and nature of the original request.
EXHIBIT 13.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002



In connection with
the Report of CIS Acquisition Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Hong Yan, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



(1)          The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)          The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.



|September 25, 2014 |                        
|------------------ | -----------------------
|                   |                        
|/s/ Hong Yan       |                        
|Name:              | Hong Yan               
|Title:             | Chief Financial Officer
H. Res. 21

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

January 19, 1999.

Resolved, That the following named Members be, and are

hereby, elected to the following standing committee of the

House of Representatives:

COMMITTEE ON THE BUDGET: Mr. Collins of Georgia

and Mr. Wamp of Tennessee, both to rank in the named

order following Mr. Ryun of Kansas.

Attest:

Clerk.