Proposed CGP

– Reference List

Proposed Permit

2003 CGP ( http://www.epa.gov/npdes/pubs/cgp2003_entirepermit.pdf )

2008 CGP ( http://www.epa.gov/npdes/pubs/cgp2008_finalpermit.pdf )

2008 MSGP ( http://www.epa.gov/npdes/pubs/msgp2008_finalpermit.pdf )

Appendix H

1. American Excelsior 2010 http://www.americanexcelsior.com/erosioncontrol/library.php (Downloaded March 9th, 2010)

2. East Coast Erosion 2010 http://eastcoasterosion.com (Downloaded April 29, 2010)

3. Beltron Inc. 2010 http://www.beltonindustries.com ( Downloaded March 9th, 2010)

4. KY BMP Manual

---- Kentucky Construction Site BMP Planning and Technical Specifications Manual, Draft

5. US Office of Surface Mining, 1998

. Guidelines for the use of the Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation (RUSLE), US Office of Surface Mining, 1998

6. EPA, 1979 . Evaluation o f Selective Erosion Control Techniques

. Piedmont Re gion of S. E.

United States http://nepis.epa.gov/Exe/ZyPURL.cgi?Dockey=300007YL.txt

7. Filtrex, 2010

. Large

- Scale Performance and Design for Construction Activity Erosion

Control Best Man agement Practices, L. B. Faucette, et.al., Journal of Env ironmental Quality, Volume 38, May

– June 2009

8. Wischmeier and Smith, 1978 Wischmeier, W.H. and D.D. Smith. Predicting Rainfall Erosion

Losses

- A Guide to Conservation Planning. USDA. AH537. Washi ngton, D.C. Dec 1978.

9. ENCAP, 2010 http://distributor.encap.net/Products/Professional/tabid/87/PAM12PlusErosionControlGra nules.aspx (Downloaded March 9th, 2010)

10. Gulf States Paper, 1977. Gulf States Paper, Report of the Sediment Yield Tests with Hold Gro Erosion Control Fabric and Competitive Products, Special Report, Technical Services
Divisino, Tuscaloosa, Alabama, 1977.

11. TRB, 1980. Transpor tation Research Board, National Research Council. 1980. Erosion Control During Highway Construction, Manual on Principles and Practices. NationalCooperative Highway Research Program, Report No. 221. Washington, D.C. (Source out of print but widely cited i n current publications)

12. StormwaterAuthority, 2010 http://www.stormwaterauthority.org/assets/114BPolymer.pdf (Downloaded March 9th, 2010)

13. Caltrans, 2003. Storm Water Quality Hand book, Project Planning and Design Gude (See

Table B

- 1)

14. North American, 2010 http://www.nagreen.com/ (Downloaded March 9th, 2010)

Appendix I

NOAA ’ s Precipitation Frequency Data Server ( http://hdsc.nws.noaa.gov/hdsc/pfds/index.html )

NOAA ’ s Atlas 14 Volumes 2, 3, and 5 ( ht tp://www.nws.noaa.gov/oh/hdsc/currentpf.htm )

NOAA ’ s Technical Paper No. 40

– Rainfall Frequency Atlas of the U.S. (1961) ( http://www.nws.noaa.gov/oh/hdsc/PF_documents/TechnicalPaper_No40.pdf )

Appendix J

USGS ’ National Hydrography Dataset ( http://nhd.usgs.gov/ )

303(d) Listed Impaired Waters NHD Indexed Dataset Metadata Details ( https://geogateway.epa.gov/geoportal/catalog/search/viewMetadataDetails.page?uuid=%7

b66F27299

- 6B1B

- 42BF

- 8AA0

- 1127D7646631%7d&innoContentType=livedata )

303(d) Listed Impaired Waters NHD Indexed Dataset Metadata: https://geogateway.epa.gov/geoportal/rest/document?id={66F27299

- 6B1B

- 42BF

- 8AA0

- 1127D7646631}&xsl=metadata_to_html_full

303(d) L isted Impaired Waters Factsheet ( http://www.epa.gov/waters/doc/factsheets/303d_impaired_waters_gis.pdf )

Impaired Waters with TMDLs NHD I ndexed Dataset Metadata Details ( https://geogateway.epa.gov/geoportal/catalog/search/viewMetadataDetails.page?uuid=%7

b73AC1C8A

- BBCF

- 4E7E

- A4CE

- AA5337D82ACA%7d&innoContentType=livedata )

Impaired Waters with TMDLs NHD Indexed Dataset Metadata ( htt ps://geogateway.epa.gov/geoportal/rest/document?id=%7b73AC1C8A

- BBCF

- 4E7E

- A4CE

AA5337D82ACA%7d&xsl=metadata_to_html_full )

Impaired Waters with TMDLs National Geospatial Dataset Fact Sheet ( http://www.epa.gov/waters/doc/factsheets/impaired_waters_with_tmdls.pdf )

EPA ’ s Reach Address Database ( http://epamap32.epa.gov/radims/ )

EPA ’ s My Environment ( http://www.epa.gov/myenvironment/new/ )

Appendix MUSDA ’ s List of Invasive or Noxious Plant Species ( http://plants.usda.gov/java/noxiousDriver )

“ Level Spreaders: Overview, Design, and Maintenance ” , North Carolina State University Cooperative Extension (2006) http://www.bae.ncsu.edu/stormwater/PublicationFiles/LevelSpreaders2006.pdf )

USDA ’ s Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation ( http://fargo.nserl.purdue.edu/rusle2_dataweb/RUSLE2_Index.htm )

Water Erosion Prediction Project ( http://milford.nserl.purdue.edu/ )

SEDCAD ( http://www.mysedcad.com/ )

Fact Sheet

– Does not include CFR citations

1. Phase I Regulations

- 55 FR 48033

- 34

2. Phase II Regulations

- 64 FR 68722 (December 8, 1999)

3. Envt Defense Ctr. v. EPA , 344 F.3d 832, 873

- 76 (9th Cir. 2003)

4. Texas Independent Producers and Royalty Owners Ass’n v. EPA , 410 F.3d 964, 977

- 78 (7th Cir. 2005))

5. Wisconsin Builders Association, National Association of Home Builders, and Utility Water

Act v. Environmental Protection Agency

6. Construction and Development Rule (“C&D rule”) in 40 CFR Part 450 promulgated on December 1, 2009 (74 Fed. Reg. 62996) ( http://water.epa.gov/scitech/wastetech/guide/construction/index.cfm )

7. New Hampshire’s Model Ordinance for Steep Slope Protection and the state’s Steep Slope and Ridgeline Protection chapter in its document Innovative Land Use Planning Techniques: A Handbook for Sustainable Development

8. Idaho’s Catalog of Stormwater BMPs for Idaho Cities and Counties (1998)

9. Massachusetts’ Erosion and Sediment Control Guidelines for Urban and Suburban Areas: A Guide for Planners, Designers, and Municipal Officials (May 2003)

10. Washington’s Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington (April 2005)

11. Maryland’s 2010 Maryland Standards an d Specifications for Soil Erosion and Sediment

Control (draft 2010)

12. California Construction General Permit ( http://www.swrcb.ca.gov/water_issues/programs/stormwater/constpermits.shtml )

13. Georgia Construction General Permit ( http://www.gaepd.org/Documents/construction_stormwater.html )14. Minnesota Construction General Permit ( http://www.pca.state.mn.us/index.php/water/water

- types

- and

programs/stormwater/constructi on

- stormwater/construction

stormwater.html?menuid=&redirect=1 )

15. North Dakota Construction General Permit ( http://www.ndhealth.gov/wq/storm/construction/constructionhome.htm )

16. Ohio Olentangy River Watershed ( http://www.epa.state.oh.us/dsw/permits/GP_ConstructionSiteStormWater_Olentangy.as

px ) and Big Darby Creek General Permit ( http://www.epa.st ate.oh.us/dsw/permits/GP_ConstructionSiteStormWater_Darby.aspx )

17. Oregon Construction General Permit ( http://www.deq.state.or.us/wq/stormwater/construction.htm )

18. Washington Construction General Permit ( http://www.ecy.wa.gov/programs/wq/stormwater/construction/ )

19. Vermont Construc tion General Permit ( http://www.anr.state.vt.us/dec/waterq/stormwater/htm/sw_cgp.htm )

20. Abu

- Zreig, M., R.P. Rudra, M.N. Lalonde, H.R. Whiteley, & Kaushik, N.K. (2004). Experimental investigation of runoff reduction and sediment removal by vegetated filter strips. Hydrological Processes

, 18, 2029

- 2037.

21. Barling, R. D., and Moore, I. D. (1994). Role of buffer strips in management of waterway pollution: A review. Environmental Management, 18 (4), 543

- 558.

22. Borin, M., M. Vianello, F. Morari, and G. Zanin. (2005). Effectiveness of buffer strips of removing pollutants in runoff from a cultivated field in North

- East Italy. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 105 , 101

- 114.

23. Castelle, A. J., Johnson, A. W., & Conolly, C. (1994). Wetland and stream buffer size requirements

– A rev iew. Journal of Environmental Quality, 23, 878

- 882.

24. Correll, D. L. (2005). Principles of planning and establishment of buffer zones. Ecological Engineering, 24, 433

- 439.

25. Gillman, J. W. (1994). Riparian wetlands and water quality. Journal of Environ mental Quality

, 23, 896

- 900.

26. Liu, X., Zhang, X., and Zhang, M. (2008). Major factors influencing the efficacy of vegetated buffers on sediment trapping: A review and analysis. Journal of Environmental Quality, 37 , 1667

- 1674.

27. Mayer, P. M., Reynolds, S . K. Jr., Canfield, T. J. and McCutchen, M.D. (2005). Riparian buffer width, vegetative cover, and nitrogen removal effectiveness: A review of current science and regulations. EPA 600

- R

- 05

- 118. Ada, Oklahoma: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, National Risk Management Research Laboratory.28. Schueler, T. (1995). The architecture of stream buffers. Watershed Protection Techniques

1: 155

- 163.

29. Welsch, D. (1991). Riparian forest buffers. FS Pub. No. NA

- PR

- 07

- 91. Radnor, PA: US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. Forest Resources Management.

30. Wenger, S. (1999). A review of the scientific literature on riparian buffer width, extent, and vegetation . Athens, GA: University of Georgia, Institute of Ecology, Office of Public

Service and Outreach.

31. Wong, S. L., McCuen, R. H. (1982). The design of vegetative buffer strips for runoff and sediment control. In R. H. McCuen (Ed.), Stormwater management in coastal areas

, Appendix J (pp. J1

- J23). College Park, MD: University of Maryland Department of Civil Engineering.

32. Yuan, Y., Bingner, R. L., & Locke, M. A.. (2009). A review of effectiveness of vegetative buffers on sediment trapping in agricultural areas. Ecohydrology, 2, 321

- 336.

33. Executive Order 13112 ( http://www.invasivespeciesinfo.gov/laws/execorder.shtml )

34. EPA’s Wadeable Streams Assessment (2006) ( http://water.epa.gov/type/rsl/monitoring/streamsurvey/index.cfm )

35. Memorandum from William Diamond (Former Director, Standards and Applied Science Division) to Victoria Binetti (Chief, Region III, Program and Support Branch), June 13, 1991.