alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2006177EN.01003302.xml

| 29.7.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 177/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.7.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 177/33

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4260 — Advent/RWE Solutions)

(2006/C 177/14)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 17 July 2006, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition web site (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes; |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition web site (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes;

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4260. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://ec.europa.eu/eur-lex/lex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4260. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://ec.europa.eu/eur-lex/lex)

---
EXHIBIT 32.1 – 906 Certification








GENMED HOLDING CORP.





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUNT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Quarterly Report of Genmed Holding Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Erwin R. Bouwens, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss. 1350, as added by ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.         The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.         The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered by the Report.








By: /s/ Erwin R. Bouwens


Erwin R. Bouwens


Chief Executive Officer


and Chairman of the Board





August 23, 2010





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 ("Section 906"), or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Genmed Holding Corp., and will be retained by Genmed Holding Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM GST
NETWORK'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             384,366,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       29,310,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                (14,449,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               384,366,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            19,052,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          14,445,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              4,607,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                 6,477,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,870,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,870,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
#### § 170.106 Should planning organizations and local governments consult with Tribes when planning for transportation projects?

Yes. When planning for transportation projects, planning organizations and local governments should consult with Tribes in the area where the project is located.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of BindView Development Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Eric J.
Pulaski, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer and President of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Corporation.


By      /s/ ERIC J. PULASKI
        -------------------------------

        Eric J. Pulaski
        Chairman of the Board, Chief
        Executive Officer and President
§ 141.54 Periodic review of performance. ( a ) The Commissioner shall review licenses at ten (10) year intervals to determine whether or not the business is operating in accordance with these regulations and all other applicable laws and regulations and whether the business is adequately serving the economic needs of the community.
( b ) If, as a result of the review provided in paragraph (a) of this section, the Commissioner finds that the licensee has repeatedly violated these regulations, the Commissioner may order the licensee to show cause according to the provisions of § 141.56 why the licensee's license should not be revoked.
( c ) If the licensee fails to show cause why the license should not be revoked, the Commissioner shall revoke the license.
# C_2006183EN.01001102.xml

| 5.8.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 183/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.8.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 183/11

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4304 — GIMA/Synbra Group)

(2006/C 183/05)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 28 July 2006, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4304. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://ec.europa.eu/eur-lex/lex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4304. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://ec.europa.eu/eur-lex/lex)

---
BLD

- 214 NOT PRECEDENTIAL
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

___________ No. 1 4

- 1538

___________ IN RE: CRAIG SAUNDERS,

Petitioner

____________________________________ On a Petition for Writ of Mandamus from the United Stat es District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania

(Related to E.D. Pa. Civ. No. 2:11

- cv - 06327 )

____________________________________ Submitted Pursuant to Rule 21, Fed. R. App. P.

March 27, 2014
Before: AMBRO, CHAGARES and VANASKIE, Circuit Judge s

( Filed: April 7, 2014 )

_________________ OPINION

_________________ PER CURIAM
In an e arlier appeal , Craig Saunders , a state prisoner, was permitted to proceed in forma pauperis. At that time, Saunders was notifi ed that he was required to pay the full $455 fee in installments regardless of the outcome of his appeal and the warden was
directed to collect and forward the fee to the District Court Clerk in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b). Saunders v. Phila. Dist . Att’y’s Office , C.A. No. 13

- 1951 (order entered May 6, 2013). Sub sequently, we summarily affirmed the judgment that Saunders2

challenged

. Saunders v. Phila. Dist. Att’y’s Office , C.A. No. 13

- 1951 (judgment entered Oct. 21, 2013). Saunders now presents a petition for a writ of mandamus . He asks us to order the
District Court Clerk to refund the fee that has been remitted and to order the warden to cease deducting funds from Saunders’s inmate account to pay the fee. He argues that he
is entitled to suc h relief because we to ok summary action on his appeal. Mandamus is an extraordinary remedy. See Kerr v. U.S. Dist. Court , 426 U.S. 394, 402 (1976). To obtain mandamus relief, a petitioner must show that “(1) no other adequate means exist to attain the r elief he desires, (2) the party’s right to issuance of the writ is clear and indisputable, and (3) the writ is appropriate under the circumstances.” Hollingsworth v. Perry , 558 U.S. 183, 190 (2010) (per curiam) (internal quotation marks
and citation omitt ed). Saunders cannot satisfy this standard. Among other things, Saunders has no right to the relief he requests. As he was notified, he is responsible for the fee for his appeal regardless of its outcome. See Porter v. Dep’t of the Treasury , 564 F.3 d 176, 179

- 80 (3d Cir. 2009) (outlining the purposes of
the filing and docketing fees and explaining that appellants are not entitled to the ir return). Once Saunders was granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis, he became obligated to pay the full fee. See id. at 180 n.4. That we took summary action before full
br iefing did not relieve him of his obligation. Accordingly, we deny Saunders’s petition.
# C_2013187EN.01001201.xml

| 29.6.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 187/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.6.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 187/12

---

Commission notice on current State aid recovery interest rates and reference/discount rates for 28 Member States applicable as from 1 July 2013

(Published in accordance with Article 10 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 794/2004 of 21 April 2004 (OJ L 140, 30.4.2004, p. 1))

2013/C 187/10

Base rates calculated in accordance with the Communication from the Commission on the revision of the method for setting the reference and discount rates (OJ C 14, 19.1.2008, p. 6). Depending on the use of the reference rate, the appropriate margins have still to be added as defined in this communication. For the discount rate, this means that a margin of 100 basis points has to be added. Commission Regulation (EC) No 271/2008 of 30 January 2008 amending the implementing regulation (EC) No 794/2004 foresees that, unless otherwise provided for in a specific decision, the recovery rate will also be calculated by adding 100 basis points to the base rate.

Modified rates are indicated in bold.

Previous table published in OJ C 144, 24.5.2013, p. 7.

| From | To | AT | BE | BG | CY | CZ | DE | DK | EE | EL | ES | FI | FR | HR | HU | IE | IT | LT | LU | LV | MT | NL | PL | PT | RO | SE | SI | SK | UK |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1.7.2013 | ... | 0,56 | 0,56 | 1,30 | 0,56 | 0,88 | 0,56 | 0,85 | 0,56 | 0,56 | 0,56 | 0,56 | 0,56 | 2,49 | 4,62 | 0,56 | 0,56 | 1,08 | 0,56 | 1,10 | 0,56 | 0,56 | 3,18 | 0,56 | 5,20 | 1,60 | 0,56 | 0,56 | 0,99 |

From

To

AT

BE

BG

CY

CZ

DE

DK

EE

EL

ES

FI

FR

HR

HU

IE

IT

LT

LU

LV

MT

NL

PL

PT

RO

SE

SI

SK

UK

1.7.2013

...

0,56

0,56

1,30

0,56

0,88

0,56

0,85

0,56

0,56

0,56

0,56

0,56

2,49

2,49

4,62

4,62

0,56

0,56

1,08

1,08

0,56

1,10

0,56

0,56

3,18

3,18

0,56

5,20

5,20

1,60

0,56

0,56

0,99

---
#### § 173.11 Supervision of permittees' rates.

All rates or charges collected by a permittee for services rendered by the permittee in the operation of the concession granted under a permit, must be submitted through the project engineer to the Secretary for approval. Copies of the approved rate schedule shall be posted in at least two conspicuous places on the premises. Approved rates may not be changed without first obtaining in the same manner a change in the rate schedule. The Secretary shall have the right to readjust rates charged from time to time and to amend or change any permit issued. Failure to comply with the approved rates automatically makes the permit subject to cancellation.
§ 163.13 Indian tribal forest enterprise operations. Indian tribal forest enterprises may be initiated and organized with consent of the authorized tribal representatives. Such enterprises may contract for the purchase of non-Indian owned forest products. Subject to approval by the Secretary the following actions may be taken: ( a ) Authorized tribal enterprises may enter into formal agreements with tribal representatives for the use of tribal forest products, and with individual beneficial Indian owners for their forest products;
( b ) Authorized officials of tribal enterprises, operating under approved agreements for the use of Indian-owned forest products pursuant to this section, may sell the forest products produced according to generally accepted trade practices;
( c ) With the consent of the beneficial Indian owners, such enterprises may, without advertisement, contract for the purchase of forest products on Indian land at stumpage rates authorized by the Secretary;
( d ) Determination of and payment for stumpage and/or products utilized by such enterprises will be authorized in accordance with § 163.22. However, the Secretary may issue special instructions for payment by methods other than those in § 163.22 of this part; and
( e ) Performance bonds may or may not be required in connection with operations on Indian land by such enterprises as determined by the Secretary.
### §253. Interference with State and Federal law

The President, by using the militia or the armed forces, or both, or by any other means, shall take such measures as he considers necessary to suppress, in a State, any insurrection, domestic violence, unlawful combination, or conspiracy, if it—

(1) so hinders the execution of the laws of that State, and of the United States within the State, that any part or class of its people is deprived of a right, privilege, immunity, or protection named in the Constitution and secured by law, and the constituted authorities of that State are unable, fail, or refuse to protect that right, privilege, or immunity, or to give that protection; or

(2) opposes or obstructs the execution of the laws of the United States or impedes the course of justice under those laws.

In any situation covered by clause (1), the State shall be considered to have denied the equal protection of the laws secured by the Constitution.

(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 15, §333; Pub. L. 109–364, div. A, title X, §1076(a)(1), Oct. 17, 2006, 120 Stat. 2404; Pub. L. 110–181, div. A, title X, §1068(a)(1), Jan. 28, 2008, 122 Stat. 325; renumbered §253, Pub. L. 114–328, div. A, title XII, §1241(a)(2), Dec. 23, 2016, 130 Stat. 2497.)

| Revised section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 333 | 50:203. | R.S. 5299. |

The words "armed forces" are substituted for the words "land or naval forces of the United States". The word "shall" is substituted for the words "it shall be lawful for * * * and it shall be his duty".

#### Derivation

Act Apr. 20, 1871, ch. 22, §3, 17 Stat. 14.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Another section 253 was renumbered section 240c of this title.

#### Amendments

2016—Pub. L. 114–328 renumbered section 333 of this title as this section.

2008—Pub. L. 110–181 amended section generally, substituting provisions directing the President to suppress certain insurrections and domestic violence in a State for provisions authorizing the President to employ the armed forces during a natural disaster or terrorist attack or to suppress an insurrection in a State and requiring notice to Congress during the exercise of such authority.

2006—Pub. L. 109–364 amended section catchline and text generally, substituting provisions authorizing the President to employ the armed forces during a natural disaster or terrorist attack or to suppress an insurrection in a State and requiring notice to Congress during the exercise of such authority for provisions directing the President to suppress certain insurrections and domestic violence in a State.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2008 Amendment

Pub. L. 110–181, div. A, title X, §1068(d), Jan. 28, 2008, 122 Stat. 326, provided that: "The amendments made by this section [amending this section and sections 334 and 12304 of this title and repealing section 2567 of this title] shall take effect on the date of the enactment of this Act [Jan. 28, 2008]."
#### § 2.506 How does the reviewing official notify the appellant and other interested parties of a decision?

The reviewing official will send the decision to the decision-maker and interested parties.
# C_2013043EN.01002801.xml

| 15.2.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 43/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.2.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 43/28

---

Summary information communicated by Member States on State aid granted in conformity with Commission Regulation (EC) No 736/2008 on the application of Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty to State aid to small and medium-sized enterprises active in the production, processing and marketing of fisheries products

2013/C 43/10

Aid No: SA.35456 (12/XF)

Member State: Spain

Region/Authority granting the aid: Comunitat Valenciana

Title of aid scheme or name of company receiving ad hoc aid: Ayudas a explotaciones piscícolas

Legal basis: Resolución de 17 de julio de 2012, de la Consellera de Agricultura, Pesca, Alimentación y Agua, por la que se adjudican a AGROALIMED determinadas tareas en explotaciones de piscicultura

Annual expenditure planned under the scheme or amount of ad hoc aid granted: EUR 15 000

Maximum aid intensity: 100 %

Date of entry into force: as of publication

Duration of the scheme or individual aid award (not later than 30 June 2014); indicate: the last quarter of the budgeted annual payment

Objective of the aid: To implement health measures for aquaculture species reared in fish farms in the Comunitat Valenciana

Indicate which of Articles 8 to 24 is used: Article 14. Aid for animal health measures

Activity concerned: Fish farms

Name and address of the granting authority:

| Conselleria de Agricultura, Pesca, Alimentación y Agua |
| --- |
| C/ Amadeo de Saboya, 2 |
| 46410 Valencia |
| ESPAÑA |

Conselleria de Agricultura, Pesca, Alimentación y Agua

C/ Amadeo de Saboya, 2

46410 Valencia

ESPAÑA

Website: http://www.agricultura.gva.es/web/c/document_library/get_file?uuid=d9ffb5e3-e479-44fb-894e-8b6b3a2b234d&groupId=16_

Indicate why a State aid scheme has been established instead of assistance under the European Fisheries Fund: Given the particularities of fish farming operations, it is advisable to put in place a series of preventive measures in the interests of animal health and public health. The activities subsidised are covered by Article 14 of Regulation (EC) No 736/2008 (Aid for animal health measures) and are part of the 2012 animal health plan.

---
### §3572. Implementation of simplified acquisition procedures

The simplified acquisition procedures contained in the Federal Acquisition Regulation pursuant to section 1901 of title 41 shall apply as provided in such section to the agencies named in section 3063 of this title.

(Added Pub. L. 103–355, title IV, §4203(a)(1), Oct. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 3345, §2302b; amended Pub. L. 111–350, §5(b)(10), Jan. 4, 2011, 124 Stat. 3843; renumbered §3572 and amended Pub. L. 116–283, div. A, title XVIII, §1823(b), (c)(2), Jan. 1, 2021, 134 Stat. 4205.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 3572 was renumbered section 7222 of this title.

#### Amendments

2021—Pub. L. 116–283 renumbered section 2302b of this title as this section and substituted "section 3063" for "section 2303(a)".

2011—Pub. L. 111–350 substituted "section 1901 of title 41" for "section 31 of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2021 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 116–283 effective Jan. 1, 2022, with additional provisions for delayed implementation and applicability of existing law, see section 1801(d) of Pub. L. 116–283, set out as a note preceding section 3001 of this title.

#### Effective Date

For effective date and applicability of section, see section 10001 of Pub. L. 103–355, set out as an Effective Date of 1994 Amendment note under section 8752 of this title.
### §9307. Aviation cadets: discharge

The Secretary of the Air Force may discharge an aviation cadet at any time.

(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 545, §8817; renumbered §9307, Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, §806(b)(12), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1833.)

| Revised section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 8817 | 10:299 (last sentence). | June 3, 1941, ch. 165, §3 (last sentence), 55 Stat. 239. |

10:299 (last sentence, less 1st 14 words) is omitted as superseded by section 681 of this title.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–232 renumbered section 8817 of this title as this section.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2018 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 115–232 effective Feb. 1, 2019, with provision for the coordination of amendments and special rule for certain redesignations, see section 800 of Pub. L. 115–232, set out as a note preceding section 3001 of this title.