alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the quarterly filing of Meier Worldwide Intermedia Inc., a
Nevada corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-QSB for the period ended January
31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"),
I, James Meier, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18
U.S.C.ss.1350), that:


(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
March 10, 2006


Date:  March  17,  2006

By: /s/ James  Meier
        -------------
        James Meier
        President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
        (Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial and
        Accounting Officer)
#### § 212.52 Fees.

The provisions of § 211.52 of this subchapter are applicable to leases under this part.
### §435. Limitations

(a) Lawful Activities.—Nothing in this subchapter authorizes the conduct of any intelligence activity that is not otherwise authorized by law or Executive order.

(b) Domestic Activities.—Personnel conducting commercial activity authorized by this subchapter may only engage in those activities in the United States to the extent necessary to support intelligence activities abroad.

(c) Providing Goods and Services to the Department of Defense.—Commercial activity may not be undertaken within the United States for the purpose of providing goods and services to the Department of Defense, other than as may be necessary to provide security for the activities subject to this subchapter.

(d) Notice to United States Persons.—(1) In carrying out a commercial activity authorized under this subchapter, the Secretary of Defense may not permit an entity engaged in such activity to employ a United States person in an operational, managerial, or supervisory position, and may not assign or detail a United States person to perform operational, managerial, or supervisory duties for such an entity, unless that person is informed in advance of the intelligence security purpose of that activity.

(2) In this subsection, the term "United States person" means an individual who is a citizen of the United States or an alien lawfully admitted to the United States for permanent residence.

(Added Pub. L. 102–88, title V, §504(a)(2), Aug. 14, 1991, 105 Stat. 439.)
#### § 183.12 How long will it take to receive a decision?

Within 30 days of receiving the information required by § 183.11 we will approve your request if it complies with the Settlement Act and this part. If we disapprove your request we will do so in writing and will provide you with the reasons for disapproval.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 

This page has not been translated. Please go to PBGC.gov's Spanish home page for more information available in Spanish.

Esta página no ha sido traducida. Por favor vaya a la página principal del sitio de español de PBGC para ver información disponible en español.

# American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 

### **Additional Information:**

                              - American Rescue Plan (ARP) Act of 2021  [congress.gov]
                              - Special Financial Assistance Program
                              - SFA Final Rule
                              - SFA Final Rule Factsheet
                              - SFA Final Rule Press Release  (7/6/2022)
                              - White House Fact Sheet
                              - Interim Final Rule
                              - Status of SFA Applications
                              - Special Financial Assistance Comments
                              - Frequently Asked Questions
                              - Webinars

The American Rescue Plan (ARP) Act of 2021, enacted on March 11, 2021, allows certain financially troubled multiemployer plans to apply for special financial assistance. 

The Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (PBGC) created a Special Financial Assistance (SFA) Program. This program addresses the immediate financial crisis threatening the retirement security of over three million American workers, retirees, and their families.

The program will provide an estimated $74 to $91 billion in assistance to enable eligible multiemployer plans to pay retirement benefits without reduction for many years into the future.
                            - SFA Program assists plans by providing funds to reinstate previously suspended benefits. 
                            - ARP also addresses the solvency of PBGC’s Multiemployer Insurance Program, which was projected to become insolvent in 2026.
                            - These hard-earned benefits are critical to the peace of mind and economic security of millions of retirees and their families.
                            - Sets forth what information a plan is required to file in its application to demonstrate eligibility for SFA and the formula to determine the amount of SFA that PBGC will pay to an eligible plan. 
                            - Identifies the priority order in which plans are permitted to apply, including a mechanism to prioritize the most impacted plans and participants first. 
                            - Outlines a processing system, which will accommodate the filing and review of many applications in a limited amount of time. 
                            - Specifies permissible investments for SFA funds and establishes certain restrictions and conditions on plans that receive SFA.

September 16, 2022
| (logo) WELLS

      FARGO | Corporate Trust Services 

 

MAC R1204-010 

9062 Old Annapolis Road 

Columbia, MD 21045 

 

Tel: 410 884 2000 

Fax: 410 715 2380 

 

  |
|----------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

 

 

Morgan Stanley Capital I Inc.

1585 Broadway

Attn: Mortgage Backed Securities

New York, New York 10036

 

 

RE: Annual Statement of Compliance for Morgan Stanley Capital I Inc. Commercial Mortgage Pass-through Certificates Series 2012-C4

 

 

Per the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of March 1, 2012 ( the "Agreement"), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Certificate Administrator ("Wells Fargo"), hereby certifies as follows as of and for the year ending December 31, 2014 (the "Reporting  Period" ) :

 

(a) A review of Wells Fargo's activities during the Reporting Period and of its performance under the Agreement has been made under such officer's supervision; and

 

(b) To the best of such officer's knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.

 

 

 

 

March 9, 2015

 

 

 

/s/ Brian Smith 

BRIAN SMITH 

Vice President

 

 

 

 

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
#### § 11.1212 Consequences of disobedience or interference.

Any willful disobedience or interference with any court order constitutes contempt of court which may result in a fine or imprisonment, or both, in accordance with this part.
#### § 18.201 May a tribe amend a tribal probate code?

Yes. A tribe may amend a tribal probate code.
§ 162.352 How will BIA decide whether to approve an assignment of a residential lease? ( a ) We may disapprove an assignment of a residential lease only if at least one of the following is true: ( 1 ) The Indian landowners have not consented, and their consent is required;
( 2 ) The lessee's mortgagees have not consented;
( 3 ) The lessee is in violation of the lease;
( 4 ) The assignee does not agree to be bound by the terms of the lease;
( 5 ) The requirements of this subpart have not been met; or
( 6 ) We find a compelling reason to withhold our approval in order to protect the best interests of the Indian landowners.
( b ) In making the finding required by paragraph (a)(6) of this section, we may consider whether the value of any part of the leased premises not covered by the assignment would be adversely affected.
( c ) We will defer, to the maximum extent possible, to the Indian landowners' determination that the assignment is in their best interest.
( d ) We may not unreasonably withhold approval of an assignment.
Exhibit 35.1

SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT

CABELAS CREDIT CARD MASTER NOTE TRUST

Cabelas Credit Card Master Note Trust

c/o WFB Funding,
LLC

4800 NW 1st Street

Lincoln, Nebraska 68521

Attention: 73001-0150

In connection with the Annual Report on
Form 10-K of Cabelas Credit Card Master Note Trust, as the issuing entity in respect of the notes, for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2017 (the Report), the undersigned, a duly
authorized officer of Capital One Bank (USA), National Association (Capital One), as servicer (the Servicer), does hereby certify and represent that:



| | 1. | Capital One is the Servicer under (i) the Third Amended and Restated Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of June 14, 2016 and (ii) the Second Amended and Restated Master Indenture dated as of
June 14, 2016, each as amended, restated, supplemented or otherwise modified through the date hereof (collectively, the Agreements) and performed the duties as Servicer from the effective time of the transfer of servicing
responsibilities from Worlds Foremost Bank to Capital One on September 25, 2017 through December 31, 2017.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | A review of the activities of Capital One, as Servicer, during the period that is the subject of the Report and of its performance under the Agreements has been made under my supervision.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 3.. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, Capital One, as Servicer, has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreements in all material respects throughout the period that is the subject of the Report.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Servicer Compliance Statement this 30th day of March, 2018.



|                                              |  |                    
|--------------------------------------------- |  | -------------------
|CAPITAL ONE BANK (USA), NATIONAL ASSOCIATION,
|                                              | 
|By:                                           |  | /s/ Michael Wassmer
|Name:                                         |  | Michael Wassmer    
|Title:                                        |  | President
IV

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 315

Supporting the goals and ideas, and commending the organizers, of ‘‘National

Unity Day’’.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 29, 1999

Mr. STARK submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on Government Reform

RESOLUTION

Supporting the goals and ideas, and commending the

organizers, of ‘‘National Unity Day’’.

Whereas the United States is a nation both enriched and

challenged by the differences among its inhabitants;

Whereas the United States is rooted in the culture of indigenous people, and has attained greater diversity through

waves of immigration;

Whereas throughout the United States, the gap between the

Nation’s prosperous citizens and its poor continues to

grow;

Whereas the people of the United States have lost too many

family members, friends, national leaders, and religious

advisers to acts of violence;
2

•HRES 315 IH

Whereas the Unity Walk will culminate in a celebration of

our Nation’s ethnic and cultural diversity in San Francisco on Sunday, October 10, 1999; and

Whereas the Unity Walkers have designated the second Sunday in October every year as ‘‘National Unity Day’’:

Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives—

2 (1) supports the goals and ideas of ‘‘National

3 Unity Day’’; and

4 (2) commends the Unity Walkers for—

5 (A) leading a walk across the United

6 States during 1999 to search for and better un7 derstand the Nation’s goodness, to promote an

8 appreciation for the diversity and disparate be9 ginnings of the American people, and to encour10 age local communities to come to terms with

11 the forces that grind against unity; and

12 (B) their efforts to use Unity Walk events

13 as catalysts for awakening the commitment in

14 communities to work for harmony and to foster

15 an awareness of a common connection among

16 all people in the United States.

Æ
**HAMMER FIBER OPTICS HOLDINGS CORP.**

 

**Certification of the Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to**

**18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

  

In connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of Hammer Fiber Optics Holdings Corp. (the “Company”) for the year ended July 31, 2019 (the “Report”), I, Michael Cothill, Chairman and Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

  

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

  

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
#### § 256.4 Information collection.

The information collection requirements contained in this part have been approved by the Office of Management and Budget under 44 U.S.C. 3507 *et seq.* and assigned control number 1076-0184. The information is collected to determine applicant eligibility for services and eligibility to participate in the program. Response is required to obtain a benefit. You may comment to the Bureau at any time with regard to this information collection.
# C_2006178EN.01003301.xml

| 29.7.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 178/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.7.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 178/33

---

Action brought on 18 May 2006 — Glaverbel v OHIM (design applied to the surface of goods)

(Case T-141/06)

(2006/C 178/61)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Glaverbel SA (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: S. Möbus, T. Koerl, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 1 March 2006 (Case R 0986/2004-4) in so far as the decision applies to the contested goods; and |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 1 March 2006 (Case R 0986/2004-4) in so far as the decision applies to the contested goods; and

| — | hold that, in respect of the contested goods, the evidence of use submitted was sufficient to demonstrate acquired distinctiveness in accordance with Article 7(3) CTMR, and that the Community trade mark application 003183068 has acquired distinctiveness in accordance with Article 7(3) CTMR; |
| --- | --- |

—

hold that, in respect of the contested goods, the evidence of use submitted was sufficient to demonstrate acquired distinctiveness in accordance with Article 7(3) CTMR, and that the Community trade mark application 003183068 has acquired distinctiveness in accordance with Article 7(3) CTMR;

| — | remit Community trade mark application 003183068 to the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) for acceptance and publication; |
| --- | --- |

—

remit Community trade mark application 003183068 to the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) for acceptance and publication;

| — | order the Office to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Office to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Community trade mark concerned: The figurative mark consisting of a design applied to the surface of goods for goods in classes 19 and 21 (unworked or semi-worked glass, patterned glass, glass sheets, etc.) (Community trade mark application 3 183 068)

Community trade mark concerned:

Decision of the examiner: Refusal of the Community trade mark application for all the goods

Decision of the examiner:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissal of the appeal

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: The applicant contests the decision of the Board of Appeal only in relation to certain goods in class 21. The applicant invokes in that respect a violation of Article 7(3) of Regulation No 40/94.

Pleas in law:

---
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS

ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Global Crossing Limited (the registrant) on Form
10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the report), I, John J. Legere, Chief Executive Officer, of the registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §
1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) The report fully
complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information
contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant.

Date:
November 9, 2006



|                       
|-----------------------
|/S/ JOHN J. LEGERE     
|John J. Legere         
|Chief Executive Officer
ARCHIVED

||
||
| **DCLPublicationDate: 3/1/95DCLID: GEN-95-16AwardYear: Summary: This letter provides information regarding the National Student Loan Data System (NSLDS) to schools participating in Title IV aid programs**MARCH 1995GEN-95-16Summary:  This letter provides information regarding the NationalStudent Loan Data System (NSLDS) to schools participating inTitle IV aid programsDear Colleague:The Department of Education (ED) recently implemented theNational Student Loan Data System (NSLDS), the first nationaldatabase of loan-level data on the Title IV aid programs.  Thisletter presents an overview of NSLDS by addressing the followingquestions:     Executive Summary     Why implement NSLDS?     What will NSLDS do?     How will NSLDS benefit the Title IV community?     Who must provide data to NSLDS?     Who can use the NSLDS?     Who can I call if I have questions?     What is the next step?We are excited about NSLDS and look forward to working with youon this important project.Sincerely,Leo KornfeldSenior Advisorto the Secretary[[ The enclosures, "Executive Summary" and "Discussion of NSLDS" is currently unavailable for viewing.  Please reference your paper document for additional information.]] |
||
| FOIA |      Privacy |      Security |      NoticesWhiteHouse.gov |      USA.gov |      ED.gov |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Opinion filed February 21, 2013



### In The 

# Eleventh Court of Appeals

_____ _

____

No. 11

- 1 3

- 00 031

- CV

__________

CAROL JOHNENE MORRIS , Appellant

V.

MIDLAND CENTRAL APPRAISAL DISTRICT , Appellee

On Appeal from the 142nd District Court

Midland County, Texas

T rial Court Cause No. TX13106

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Carol Johnene Morris filed a pro se notice of appeal from an order of partial dismissal

that was entered by the trial court on December 31, 2012. We notified Morris by letter dated

J anuary 30 , 201 3 , that it did not appear to this court that a final

, appealable order had been

entered by the trial court, and we requested that Morris file a response show ing grounds to

continue this appeal. Morris filed a response on February 11. However, she has not shown

appropriate grounds to continue

.
Unless specifically authorized by statute, appeals may be taken only from final

judgments. Tex. A & M Univ. Sys. v. Koseoglu , 233 S.W.3d 835, 840

– 41 (Tex. 2007);2 Lehmann v. Har

- Con Corp. , 39 S.W.3d 191 (Tex. 2001). In t h is case, the trial court merely

ordered that “this case is dismissed only as to the Properties listed below. ” The dismissal was

entered without prejudice to t he ability of the plaintiff, Midland Central Appraisal District, to

refile the cause of action against Morris at a later date. The order specifically states that the

remaining causes of action as to all other property may be further prosecuted. Morris su ggests in

her response that the trial court’s order constituted a severance order rendering judgment for the

plaintiff. We disagree. There is no indication that the trial court intended for the order to be

final and appealable, and it is not. Because no final

, appealable order has been entered in this

case, w e lack jurisdiction and dismiss this appeal

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.3.

Accordingly, t h e appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

PER CURIAM

February 21, 2013

Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

McCall, J., and Willson , J.