alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2006199EN.01000101.xml

| 24.8.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 199/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.8.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 199/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

23 August 2006

(2006/C 199/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2812 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 149,09 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4615 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,67730 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,2010 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5799 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 90,08 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,0430 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5761 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 28,106 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 275,65 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6959 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4293 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,9045 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,5294 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,59 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 37,615 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,8689 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6735 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4243 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,9649 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 2,0027 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0164 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 224,31 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,0795 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 10,2110 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,2895 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 658,28 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,708 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 65,751 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 34,2740 |
| THB | Thai baht | 48,184 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2812

JPY

Japanese yen

149,09

DKK

Danish krone

7,4615

GBP

Pound sterling

0,67730

SEK

Swedish krona

9,2010

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5799

ISK

Iceland króna

90,08

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,0430

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5761

CZK

Czech koruna

28,106

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

275,65

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6959

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4293

PLN

Polish zloty

3,9045

RON

Romanian leu

3,5294

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,59

SKK

Slovak koruna

37,615

TRY

Turkish lira

1,8689

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6735

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4243

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,9649

NZD

New Zealand dollar

2,0027

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0164

KRW

South Korean won

1 224,31

ZAR

South African rand

9,0795

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

10,2110

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,2895

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 658,28

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,708

PHP

Philippine peso

65,751

RUB

Russian rouble

34,2740

THB

Thai baht

48,184

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
340 Woodpecker Ridge

Santa Cruz, CA 95060

www.joby.aero

831.426.3733

RE: Request for Information

- FAA

- 2016

- 5094

Dear Mr Dan Ngo et al,

S4

- MH a nd S4

- SSL may be removed from our exemption request as these two platforms now operate

under Part 107 rules without relief. The S4

- SS configuration continues to require a 333 exemption as it

exceeds the 5 5 p o und weight limit of Part 107

.

Please see Appendix A which contains the requested proprietary information which has been submitted

via e

- mail to 333exemptions@faa.gov

.

Thank you for your assistance i n processing our exemption request.

Sincerely,

Brett Goldsmith

Joby Avi ation

340 Woodpecker Ridge Santa Cruz,

CA 95060
United States Court of Appeals 

for the Fifth Circuit 

No. 20-11059 

Summary Calendar 

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee, 

versus

Gustavo Trejo-Ramos, 

Defendant—Appellant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the Northern District of Texas 

USDC No. 4:20-CR-97-1 

Before Davis, Stewart, and Dennis, Circuit Judges. 

Per Curiam:*

Gustavo Trejo-Ramos appeals the 33-month, above-guidelines 

sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction for illegal reentry after 

removal from the United States. He contends that his sentence is 

unconstitutional because his indictment alleged only those facts sufficient for 

*

 Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this 

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited 

circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4. 

United States Court of Appeals 

Fifth Circuit 

FILED 

June 18, 2021 

Lyle W. Cayce 

Clerk 

Case: 20-11059 Document: 00515905845 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/18/2021
No. 20-11059 

2 

a conviction under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and did not include any allegations of 

a prior conviction necessary for a sentence enhancement under § 1326(b)(2). 

He concedes that this argument is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United 

States, 523 U.S. 224, 226-27 (1998), but seeks to preserve the issue for further 

review. The Government has filed an unopposed motion for summary 

affirmance, agreeing that the issue is foreclosed, and in the alternative, a 

motion for an extension of time to file a brief. 

As the Government argues, and Trejo-Ramos concedes, the sole issue 

raised on appeal is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres. See United States v. 

Wallace, 759 F.3d 486, 497 (5th Cir. 2014); United States v. Pineda-Arrellano, 

492 F.3d 624, 625-26 (5th Cir. 2007). Because the issue is foreclosed, 

summary affirmance is appropriate. See Groendyke Transp., Inc. v. Davis, 406 

F.2d 1158, 1162 (5th Cir. 1969). 

Accordingly, the Government’s motion for summary affirmance is 

GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. The 

Government’s alternative motion for an extension of time to file a brief is 

DENIED. 

Case: 20-11059 Document: 00515905845 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/18/2021
#### § 115.711 How is money in a trust account invested?

OTFM manages trust fund investments and its investment decisions are governed by federal statute. See 25 U.S.C. §§ 161(a) and 162a.
### Faulk, Scott (OST) From: Sent: To: Subject: Aloha, Ryan Mahiai <ryan_mahiai@hotmail.com> Wednesday, April 23, 2014 11:05 PM EAS (OST) In Support of Makani Kai for EAS

As a resident of Kalaupapa I am STILL in continued support of Makani Kai forthe EAS I Kalaupapa! Thankyou foryourconsideration! Ryan Mahiai

1
**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 In connection with Amendment No. 1 to the Quarterly Report of SkyLynxCommunications, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB/A-1 for the period endedSeptember 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report'), we, Gary L. Brown,President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Dan Sullivan, ChiefFinancial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

|  | (1) | The Report fully complies      with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange      Act of 1934; and                               |
|--|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  | (2) | The information contained      in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial      condition and result of operations of the Company. |

/s/ Gary L. Brown                Gary L. Brown, President andChief Executive OfficerJanuary 13, 2004

/s/ Dan Sullivan                     Dan Sullivan,Chief Financial OfficerJanuary 13, 2004
#### § 170.602 If a Tribe incurs unforeseen construction costs, can it get additional funds?

The TTP is a Tribal shares program based upon a statutory funding formula. Therefore, no additional TTP funding beyond each Tribe's share is available for unforeseen construction costs. However, a Tribe may reprogram their TTP Tribal shares from other projects or activities identified on their FHWA-approved TTIP to cover unforeseen costs. In addition, if a Tribe is operating under a self-determination contract, it may request that additional dollars from its TTP Tribal share funds be made available for that project under 25 CFR 900.130(e).
#### § 26.22 May a tribe integrate Job Placement and Training funds into its Public Law 102-477 Plan?

Yes, Indian tribes may integrate Job Placement and Training Program funds into their Public Law 102-477 Plan.
# C_2006227EN.01000101.xml

| 21.9.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 227/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.9.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 227/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

20 September 2006

(2006/C 227/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2676 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 148,70 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4605 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,67310 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,2168 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5875 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 89,17 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,2790 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5767 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 28,437 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 273,47 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6960 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4293 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,9483 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,5317 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,59 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 37,465 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,8686 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6844 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4299 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,8691 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,9273 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0104 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 205,30 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,3749 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 10,0476 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4350 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 620,72 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,665 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 63,570 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 33,9600 |
| THB | Thai baht | 47,824 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2676

JPY

Japanese yen

148,70

DKK

Danish krone

7,4605

GBP

Pound sterling

0,67310

SEK

Swedish krona

9,2168

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5875

ISK

Iceland króna

89,17

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,2790

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5767

CZK

Czech koruna

28,437

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

273,47

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6960

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4293

PLN

Polish zloty

3,9483

RON

Romanian leu

3,5317

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,59

SKK

Slovak koruna

37,465

TRY

Turkish lira

1,8686

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6844

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4299

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,8691

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,9273

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0104

KRW

South Korean won

1 205,30

ZAR

South African rand

9,3749

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

10,0476

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4350

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 620,72

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,665

PHP

Philippine peso

63,570

RUB

Russian rouble

33,9600

THB

Thai baht

47,824

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
§ 175.135 Why is BIA collecting this information? We are collecting this information so we can: ( a ) Provide you with service;
( b ) Bill you for the service we provide; and
( c ) Account for monies you pay us, including any deposits as outlined in the Operations Manual.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

December 10, 2003

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 03-10252

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

CIPRIANO LOPEZ-CASTANEDA,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:02-CR-00286-ALL-R

--------------------

Before DAVIS, EMILIO M. GARZA, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

 Cipriano Lopez-Castaneda appeals the sentence imposed

following his guilty plea conviction of being found in the United

States after deportation/removal in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. 

Lopez-Castaneda contends that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and 8 U.S.C.

§ 1326(b) define separate offenses. He argues that the prior

conviction that resulted in his increased sentence is an element

of a separate offense under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) that should have

been alleged in his indictment. Lopez-Castaneda maintains that
No. 03-10252

-2-

he pleaded guilty to an indictment which charged only simple

reentry under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). He argues that his sentence

exceeds the term of imprisonment which may be imposed for that

offense.

In Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235

(1998), the Supreme Court held that the enhanced penalties in

8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) are sentencing provisions, not elements of

separate offenses. The Court further held that the sentencing

provisions do not violate the Due Process Clause. Id. at 239-47. 

Lopez-Castaneda acknowledges that his argument is foreclosed by

Almendarez-Torres, but asserts that the decision has been cast

into doubt by Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 490 (2000). 

He seeks to preserve his argument for further review. 

Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres. See Apprendi,

530 U.S. at 489-90; United States v. Dabeit, 231 F.3d 979, 984

(5th Cir. 2000). This court must follow Almendarez-Torres

“unless and until the Supreme Court itself determines to overrule

it.” Dabeit, 231 F.3d at 984 (internal quotation marks and

citation omitted). The judgment of the district court is

AFFIRMED.

The Government has moved for a summary affirmance in lieu of

filing an appellee’s brief. In its motion, the Government asks

that an appellee’s brief not be required. The motion is GRANTED. 

AFFIRMED; MOTION GRANTED.
##### 



Exhibit 31.1 CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Eric J. Pulaski, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A, Amendment No. 1 of BindView Development
Corporation; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations
and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating
to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and
procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth
fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit
committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting. Date: December 20, 2004  /s/ ERIC J. PULASKIEric J. Pulaski

Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
§ 457.160 Communications. ( a ) The agency shall take appropriate steps to ensure effective communication with applicants, participants, personnel of other Federal entities, and members of the public. ( 1 ) The agency shall furnish appropriate auxiliary aids where necessary to afford a handicapped person an equal opportunity to participate in, and enjoy the benefits of, a program or activity conducted by the agency. ( i ) In determining what type of auxiliary aid is necessary, the agency shall give primary consideration to the requests of the handicapped person.
( ii ) The agency need not provide individually prescribed devices, readers for personal use or study, or other devices of a personal nature.
( 2 ) Where the agency communicates with applicants and beneficiaries by telephone, telecommunication devices for deaf person (TDD's) or equally effective telecommunication systems shall be used.
( b ) The agency shall ensure that interested persons, including persons with impaired vision or hearing, can obtain information as to the existence and location of accessible services, activities, and facilities.
( c ) The agency shall provide signage at a primary entrance to each of its inaccessible facilities, directing users to a location at which they can obtain information about accessible facilities. The international symbol for accessibility shall be used at each primary entrance of an accessible facility.
( d ) This section does not require the agency to take any action that it can demonstrate would result in a fundamental alteration in the nature of a program or activity or in undue financial and administrative burdens. In those circumstances where agency personnel believe that the proposed action would fundamentally alter the program or activity or would result in undue financial and administrative burdens, the agency has the burden of proving that compliance with § 457.160 would result in such alteration or burdens. The decision that compliance would result in such alteration or burdens must be made by the agency head or his or her designee after considering all agency resources available for use in the funding and operation of the conducted program or activity, and must be accompanied by a written statement of the reasons for reaching that conclusion. If an action required to comply with this section would result in such an alteration or such burdens, the agency shall take any other action that would not result in such an alteration or such burdens but would nevertheless ensure that, to the maximum extent possible, handicapped persons receive the benefits and services of the program or activity.
# Instructions

mailto:informationquality@omb.eop.govmailto:mschwab@omb.eop.govmailto:james_h_kim@omb.eop.gov

# Section I

# Section II

# Section III

# Section IV
§ 161.402 What are the procedures for reissuing permits? BIA, with the concurrence of the Navajo Nation, will reissue grazing permits only to individuals that meet the eligibility requirements in § 161.400. Responsibilities for reissuance of grazing permits are as follows: ( a ) BIA will develop a complete list consisting of all former permittees whose permits were cancelled and the number of animal units previously authorized in prior grazing permits. This list will be provided to the Grazing Committee and Resources Committee for their review. BIA will also provide the Grazing Committee and Resources Committee with the current carrying capacity and stocking rate for each range unit within the Navajo Partitioned Lands, as determined under § 161.204.
( b ) Within 90 days of receipt, the Grazing Committee will review the list developed under § 161.402(a), and make recommendations to the Resources Committee for the granting of grazing permits according to the eligibility and priority criteria in § 161.400.
( c ) If the Grazing Committee fails to make its recommendation to the Resources Committee within 90 days after receiving the list of potential permittees, BIA will submit its recommendations to the Resources Committee.
( d ) The Resources Committee will review and concur with the list of proposed permit grantees, and then forward a final list to BIA for the reissuance of grazing permits. If the Resources Committee does not concur, the procedures outlined in § 161.800 will govern.
( e ) The final determination list of eligible permittees will be published. Permits will not be issued sooner than 90 days following publication of the final list.
§ 26.6 Who is eligible to receive financial assistance? Financial assistance is only available to persons: ( a ) Approved for training that will lead to permanent, gainful and meaningful employment; or
( b ) Who have obtained a job and need financial assistance to retain the job, as determined by the servicing office.
confidential





ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE



Reference is hereby made to that certain
Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of May 1, 2012, by and among UBS Commercial Mortgage Securitization Corp., as Depositor,
Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer, Midland Loan Services, a division of PNC Bank, National Association,
as Special Servicer, Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as Trustee, Certificiate Administrator, Paying Agent and Custodian and
Trimont Real Estate Advisors, Inc., as Operating Advisor, with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series
2012-C1 (the “Agreement”). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in
the Agreement.



Pursuant to Section 10.11 of this Agreement,
I, Leslie Hayton, Managing Director of Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that:



| | 1. | A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period from January 1, 2018 through
December 31, 2018 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance per the Agreement during such period has been made
under my supervision, and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has fulfilled all of its
obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------







IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has
executed this Certificate as of the 28th day of February 2019.







_______________________

Leslie Hayton

Managing Director
Wells Fargo Bank









confidential
#### § 286.7 Location of enterprise.

To be eligible for a grant an economic enterprise must be located on an Indian reservation or located where it makes or will make an economic contribution to a nearby reservation by providing employment to tribal members residing thereon or by expending a portion of its income for materials or services on the reservation. Economic enterprises which are or will be operated on a reservation must comply with the requirements of applicable rules, resolutions or ordinances adopted by the governing body of the tribe, if applicable.