alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Coming Home

By Cpl. Matthew Bragg, U.S. Marine Corps Forces, Pacific

**TARAWA, Kiribati -- **

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More News/Articles
### §2838. Leasing of military family housing to Secretary of Defense

(a) Authority.—(1) The Secretary of a military department may lease to the Secretary of Defense military family housing in the National Capital Region (as defined in section 2674(f) of this title).

(2) In determining the military housing unit to lease under this section, the Secretary of Defense should first consider any available military housing units that are already substantially equipped for executive communications and security.

(b) Rental Rate.—A lease under subsection (a) shall provide for the payment by the Secretary of Defense of consideration in an amount equal to 105 percent of the monthly rate of basic allowance for housing prescribed under section 403(b) of title 37 for a member of the uniformed services in the pay grade of O–⁠10 with dependents assigned to duty at the military installation on which the leased housing unit is located. A rate so established shall be considered the fair market value of the lease interest.

(c) Treatment of Proceeds.—(1) The Secretary of a military department shall deposit all amounts received pursuant to leases entered into by the Secretary under this section into a special account in the Treasury established for such military department.

(2) The proceeds deposited into the special account of a military department pursuant to paragraph (1) shall be available to the Secretary of that military department, without further appropriation, for the maintenance, protection, alteration, repair, improvement, or restoration of military housing on the military installation at which the housing leased pursuant to subsection (a) is located.

(Added Pub. L. 110–417, div. B, title XXVIII, §2804(a), Oct. 14, 2008, 122 Stat. 4720.)
§ 1000.465 May a Tribe/Consortium negotiate AFA provisions on conflicts of interest to take the place of this subpart? ( a ) A Tribe/Consortium and the Secretary may agree to AFA provisions, concerning either personal or organizational conflicts, that: ( 1 ) Address the issues specific to the program and activities contracted; and
( 2 ) Provide equivalent protection against conflicts of interest to these regulations.
( b ) Agreed-upon AFA provisions shall be followed, rather than the related provisions of this subpart. For example, the Tribe/Consortium and the Secretary may agree that using the Tribe's/Consortium's own written code of ethics satisfies the objectives of the personal conflicts provisions of subpart, in whole or in part.
# C_2006165EN.01000302.xml

| 15.7.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 165/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.7.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 165/3

---

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 4 May 2006 — Commission of the European Communities v United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland

(Case C-98/04) (1)

1

(Failure to fulfil obligations - Directive 85/337/EEC - Assessment of the effects of certain projects on the environment - Project carried out without prior application for development consent or assessment - Action inadmissible)

(2006/C 165/06)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: M. Shotter and F. Simonetti, Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (represented by: K. Manji, and subsequently by M. Bethell, Agents, and by P. Sales and J. Maurici, Barristers)

Defendant:

Re:

Infringement of Article 2(1) and Article 4 of Council Directive 85/337/EEC of 27 June 1985 on the assessment of the effects of certain public and private projects on the environment (OJ 1985 L 175, p. 40), as amended by Directive 97/11/EC of 3 March 1997 (OJ 1997 L 73, p. 5) — Consent given without assessment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action as inadmissible; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action as inadmissible;

| 2. | Orders the Commission of the European Communities to pay the costs |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Commission of the European Communities to pay the costs

---

(1)  OJ C 106, 30.4.2004.

1

---
Exhibit 10.1


 


CODORUS VALLEY BANCORP, INC.


2017 LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN


RESTRICTED STOCK UNIT AGREEMENT


 


The Grantee identified below has been granted an Award
under the Restricted Stock Unit provisions of the 2017 Long-Term Incentive Plan of Codorus Valley Bancorp, Inc. (the "Plan").
The purpose of this Agreement is to communicate to the Grantee the specific terms of that Award, to serve as evidence of the Plan rights
that have been awarded, and to obtain the Grantee's acknowledgement of the Award and agreement to be bound by the Plan's provisions. This
Agreement is to be interpreted and applied in conjunction with the provisions of the Plan which is incorporated by reference herein.


 


	I.	Name of Grantee:	
    Craig L. Kauffman

     

	II.	Date of Grant:	
    November 9, 2021

     

	III.	Total Number of Shares Covered by the Restricted Stock Unit Award	
    15,564

     

	IV.	
    60% of grant (9,338.4 units) shall be performance-based restricted stock
    units with cliff vesting after the performance period ends on December 31, 2024 subject to achievement of the performance goal as outlined
    below:

     

    Performance Metrics            Target            Stretch

    FY 2024 ROE                  10.00%          12.00%

    Performance Factor

    (% of Target)                   100%               150%

    Pro rata increase in units between 10% and 12% ROE

     
	
    Start: November 9, 2021

     

    End: December 31, 2024

	V.	
    40% of grant (6,225.6 units) shall be time-based restricted stock units
    which shall vest ratably over a three-year period as follows:

     

    1/3 will vest November 9, 2022

    1/3 will vest November 9, 2023

    1/3 will vest November 9, 2024

     
	
    Start: November 9, 2021

     

    End: November 9, 2024

	VI.	Consequences of Termination of Employment during the Restriction Period	As provided in the Plan


 


The performance-based Restricted Stock Units and time-based Restricted
Stock Units will earn dividend equivalents during the restricted period at the rate of dividends per share paid by the Company on its
outstanding shares of common stock. Dividend equivalents will be accrued to be reinvested in additional restricted stock units which shall
be similarly restricted.


 


The foregoing Award was duly made by the Board of Directors of Codorus
Valley Bancorp, Inc. pursuant to the terms of the Plan, effective as of the date of grant indicated above.


 


	 	CODORUS VALLEY BANCORP, INC.
	 	By:       /s/ Larry J. Miller	
	 	Title:     Executive Chairman












 


Grantee's Receipt and Acknowledgment


 


By signing below, the Grantee hereby acknowledges receipt
of a copy of this Agreement and the Plan and agrees to be subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement and the Plan.


 





	Date November 9, 2021	/s/ Craig L. Kauffman
	 	Name:   Craig L. Kauffman
### **CHAPTER 9A—AUDIT**

Sec.
240a.
Audit of Department of Defense financial statements.
240b.
Financial Improvement and Audit Remediation Plan.
240c.
Audit: consolidated corrective action plan; centralized reporting system.
240d.
Audits: audit of financial statements of Department of Defense components by independent external auditors.
240e.
Audits: use of commercial data integration and analysis products in preparing audits.
240f.
Audits: selection of service providers for audit services.
240g.
Defense Business Audit Remediation Plan.
240h.
Annual report on auditable financial statements.
240i.
Annual report on unfunded priorities.
[251 to 254b.
Renumbered.]

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**2021**—Pub. L. 116–283, div. A, title X, §1005(b)(2), Jan. 1, 2021, 134 Stat. 3838, added item 240i.

**2019**—Pub. L. 116–92, div. A, title X, §§1002(b), 1004(a)(2), Dec. 20, 2019, 133 Stat. 1571, 1573, added items 240g and 240h.

**2018**—Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title X, §1002(a)(1)(B), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1945, renumbered items 251 to 254b as 240a to 240f, respectively.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 274 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                        August 5, 1999.
    Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in order to 
consider the conference report to accompany the bill (H.R. 2488) to amend the 
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to reduce individual income tax rates, to provide 
marriage penalty relief, to reduce taxes on savings and investments, to provide 
estate and gift tax relief, to provide incentives for education savings and 
health care, and for other purposes. All points of order against the conference 
report and against its consideration are waived. The conference report shall be 
considered as read. The yeas and nays shall be considered as ordered on the 
question of adoption of the conference report and on any subsequent conference 
report or on any motion to dispose of an amendment between the houses on H.R. 
2488. Clause 5(b) of rule XXI shall not apply to the question of adoption of the 
conference report and to any subsequent conference report or to any motion to 
dispose of an amendment between the houses on H.R. 2488.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
§ 2.606 May I appeal inaction by a reviewing official on an appeal from a decision? ( a ) Yes. If a reviewing official fails to take action on the appeal within the timeframes established in § 2.505, any interested party may appeal the reviewing official's inaction as provided for in this subpart.
( b ) Inaction by the IBIA or by the AS-IA is not subject to appeal under this part.
#### Jasper Chair Company et al. *v.*Albion Brick Company.

[No. 12,006.

Filed December 17, 1924.

Rehearing *denied*February 27, 1925.]

Exceptions, Bill *of.—Application for extension of time for filing\ bill of exceptions must be made before expiration of time first*granted.—Under the express provisions of §661 Burns 1914, Acts 1911 p. 193, an application for an extension of time to file a bill of exceptions must be made and the time for the hearing thereof set • for a day prior to the expiration of the time first granted, and an extension granted on an application made after the expiration of such time is a nullity.

From Daviess Circuit Court; *Milton S. Hastings,*Judge.

Action by the Albion Brick Company against the Jasper Chair Company and others. From a judgment for plaintiff, the defendants appeal.

*Affirmed.*

*C. J. Kollmeyer, W. H. Everroad, C. B. Cooper, Bomar Traylor, George A. Faith*and *James E. Bingham,*for appellants.

*W. C. Cox*and *Alvin Padgett,*for appellee.

McMahan, J.

The questions involved in this appeal require a consideration of the evidence. After judgment, appellants filed separate motions for a new trial. These motions were overruled October 3, 1923, and sixty days given in which to file bill of exceptions. December 4, 1923, appellants filed an application for an extension of time within which to file bill of exceptions. *519Notice of the filing of the application and that the same would be heard December 8, 1923, was given December 4. On December 8, the court extended the time for filing the bill of exceptions thirty days, and within the time as extended, appellants filed the bill of exceptions containing the evidence.

This cause might well be affirmed on authority, but we deem it advisable to again call attention to §661 Burns 1914, Acts 1911 p. 193, which authorizes the court or judge in vacation to extend the time for filing a bill of exceptions, and particularly to that part of the section reading as follows: “Provided further, that the application must be made and the time for the hearing thereof set fór a day prior to the expiration of the time first given.”

The application of appellants for an extension of the time within which to file the bill of exceptions not having been filed "prior to the expiration of the time first given," the act of the court in extending the time being without authority of law, was void. It follows that the evidence is not in the record and the judgment must be affirmed. See *Fauvre Coal Co.*v. *Kushner*(1919), 188 Ind. 314 ; *Richmond Light, etc., Co.*v. *Rau*(1915), 184 Ind. 117 ; *English*v. *English*(1915), 182 Ind. 675 ; *King-Crowther Corp.*v. *Ashcraft*(1916), 60 Ind. App. 412; *Dietrich*v. *Minas*(1915), 61 Ind. App. 333; *City of Huntington*v. *Kaufman*(1912), 55 Ind. App. 341; *Fostoria Oil Co.*v. *Gardner*(1919), 72 Ind. App. 509; *Ft. Wayne, etc., Traction Co.*v. *Kumb*(1917), 64 Ind. App. 529.

Judgment affirmed.
EX-31Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certifications.

 

 

I,Anthony Sfarra, certify that:

 

1.I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D requiredto be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of theWFRBS Commercial Mortgage Trust 2012-C6 (the "Exchange Act periodicreports");

 

2.Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, donot contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3.Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other informationrequired to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this reportis included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

 

4.Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required in thisreport under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in theExchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligationsunder the servicing agreements in all material respects; and

 

5.All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria forasset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment ofcompliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to beincluded in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB andExchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to thisreport, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances ofnoncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report onForm 10-K.

 

Ingiving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on informationprovided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:

 

RialtoCapital Advisors, LLC, as Special Servicer, Deutsche Bank Trust CompanyAmericas, as Trustee, Pentalpha Surveillance LLC, as Trust Advisor, CoreLogicCommercial Real Estate Services, Inc., as Servicing Function Participant,National Tax Search, LLC, as Servicing Function Participant, and PrudentialAsset Resources, Inc., as Primary Servicer.

 

 

 

Dated:October 31, 2019

 

 

/s/Anthony Sfarra

 

 

President

(senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor)
`[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 915 Reported in Senate (RS)]






                                                       Calendar No. 393
106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 915


_______________________________________________________________________


                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 26, 1999

  Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental 
                                Affairs

                            November 4, 1999

              Reported by Mr. Thompson, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT


 
 To authorize a cost of living adjustment in the pay of administrative 
                              law judges.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PAY OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES.

    Section 5372(b) of title 5, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (1), by inserting ``(A)'' after ``(1)'' 
        and by striking all after the first sentence and inserting the 
        following:
    ``(B) Within level AL-3, there shall be 6 rates of basic pay, 
designated as AL-3, rates A through F, respectively. Level AL-2 and 
level AL-1 shall each have 1 rate of basic pay.
    ``(C) The rate of basic pay for AL-3, rate A, may not be less than 
65 percent of the rate of basic pay for level IV of the Executive 
Schedule, and the rate of basic pay for AL-1 may not exceed the rate 
for level IV of the Executive Schedule.'';
            (2) in paragraph (3)(A), by striking ``upon'' each time it 
        appears and inserting ``at the beginning of the next pay period 
        following''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
    ``(4) Subject to paragraph (1), effective at the beginning of the 
first applicable pay period commencing on or after the first day of the 
month in which an adjustment takes effect under section 5303 in the 
rates of basic pay under the General Schedule, each rate of basic pay 
for administrative law judges shall be adjusted by an amount determined 
by the President to be appropriate.''.
                                     





                                                       Calendar No. 393

106th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 915

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To authorize a cost of living adjustment in the pay of administrative 
                              law judges.

_______________________________________________________________________

                            November 4, 1999

                       Reported without amendment`
IV

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 280

Recognizing the importance of strong marriages and the contributions that

community marriage policies have made to the strength of marriages

throughout the United States.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

AUGUST 5, 1999

Mr. EHLERS (for himself, Mr. HOEKSTRA, Mr. UPTON, Mr. GUTKNECHT, Mr.

PITTS, Mr. WHITFIELD, Mr. PACKARD, Mr. VITTER, Mr. BARTLETT of

Maryland, Mr. GILCHREST, Mr. PORTER, Mr. LARGENT, Mrs. WILSON,

and Mr. MANZULLO) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Education and the Workforce

RESOLUTION

Recognizing the importance of strong marriages and the

contributions that community marriage policies have

made to the strength of marriages throughout the United

States.

Whereas a community marriage policy is a set of agreed-upon

guidelines for premarital preparation and community

support for marriage to which individuals, the community, clergy, and congregations voluntarily commit;

Whereas visionary communities have adopted community

marriage policies to empower couples for healthy, lifelong

marriage and to foster an environment that has the
2

•HRES 280 IH

greatest likelihood of ensuring the well-being of our citizens, especially our children;

Whereas one example of a successful community marriage

policy is the Greater Grand Rapids Community Marriage

Policy, which outlines a menu for a successful marriage,

including not marrying too young, finishing school, choosing a mate with similar values, dating at least a year before marriage, completing a premarital course, waiting to

cohabit until after marriage, emphasizing the positive,

sharing the household duties, worshiping together, having

fun together, and remembering that commitment is the

foundation for successful marriage; and

Whereas community members can support a community marriage policy by volunteering their time, expertise, influence, and resources to support initiatives that promote

marriage and stable families: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives—

2 (1) recognizes the importance of strong mar3 riages for a strong society;

4 (2) commends the Greater Grand Rapids com5 munity and other communities which have estab6 lished community marriage policies for their efforts

7 to support marriage and prevent the problems of di8 vorce; and

9 (3) encourages other communities in the United

10 States to develop community marriage policies to en11 able community members to work together to
3

•HRES 280 IH

1 strengthen marriages and provide stable environ2 ments for children.

3 SEC. 2. The Clerk of the House of Representatives

4 shall transmit an enrolled copy of this resolution to the

5 President of the United States.

Æ
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 71 (Friday, April 12, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 22020]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-08663]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 8272]

State Department Advisory Committee on Private International Law; 
Closed Meeting

    In accordance with section 10(a) of the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act, 5 U.S.C. App Sec.  10(a), the Department of State announces a 
meeting of the full Advisory Committee on Private International Law 
(ACPIL) to take place on May 13, 2013, at the Department of State, 
Washington, DC.
    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 
U.S.C. App Sec.  10(d), and 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(9)(B), it has been 
determined that this ACPIL meeting will be closed to the public because 
the ACPIL will be discussing matters the public disclosure of which 
would be likely to significantly frustrate Department negotiations in 
an upcoming international forum.
    For more information, contact Tricia Smeltzer at 202-776-8423 or 
smeltzertk@state.gov, or Niesha Toms at 202-776-8420, tomsnn@state.gov.

    Dated: April 5, 2013.
Michael Coffee,
Attorney-Adviser, Private International Law.
[FR Doc. 2013-08663 Filed 4-11-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-08-P
```