alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-6817

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

WILLIE JAMES JONES, a/k/a Ricky Jones,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., Chief District Judge. (CR-93-285, CA-00-1253-17)

Submitted: October 26, 2000 Decided: November 2, 2000

Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Willie James Jones, Appellant Pro Se. Dean Arthur Eichelberger,

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Willie James Jones seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.

2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of

the district court. See United States v. Jones, Nos. CR-93-285;

CA-00-1253-17 (D.S.C. May 24, 2000). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Lanbo Financial Group, Inc. on
Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Pingji Lu, Chairman of the Board and
Chief Executive Officer of Lanbo Financial Group, Inc. (the "Company"), certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

      1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company as of and for the period covered by the Report.

Pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission,
this certification is being furnished and is not deemed filed.


Dated:  May 16, 2005           /s/ Pingji Lu
                               ------------------
                               Pingji Lu
                               Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
### Adams, Kevin (OST) From: 

### Sent: To: 

### Subject: August 16, 2012 Mr. Kevin Adams DepattmentofTransportation DearMr. Adams, Jeff Savage <jsavage@offshoresystemsinc.com> Thursday, August 16, 2012 2:52 PM Adams, Kevin (OSD Adak Essential Air Service J t_j

Iam writing on behalfofOffshore Systems, Inc. (OSI) to voice support ofthe Alaska Airlines proposal for the providing essential air service to Adak, Alaska. The proposal by Alaska Airlines offers a robust combination ofpassenger and cargo service andoffers the lowest total cost proposal submitted. AdakOffshore is looking forward to providing ourMarineTerminal shore base support services utilizing the Adak marine, warehousing and lay down areas. Reliable, consistent and proven air service support for the movement of personnel and freight is critical to our venture's success. Alaska Airlines provides a service record to Adak that provides ouroperation with confidence that ourair service needs will be met. Sincerely, JeffSavage 

### Jeff Savage General Manager 

### Offshore Systems, Inc. 12019 76th Place NE Kirkland, WA 98034 (425) 828-6434 Office (425) 827-2105 Fax (206) 963-6152 Cell

1
Editorial Note on Part 23
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 23 appear at 79 FR 27190, May 13, 2014.

§ 23.105 How do I contact a Tribe under the regulations in this subpart? To contact a Tribe to provide notice or obtain information or verification under the regulations in this subpart, you should direct the notice or inquiry as follows: ( a ) Many Tribes designate an agent for receipt of ICWA notices. The BIA publishes a list of Tribes' designated Tribal agents for service of ICWA notice in the Federal Register each year and makes the list available on its Web site at *www.bia.gov .*
( b ) For a Tribe without a designated Tribal agent for service of ICWA notice, contact the Tribe to be directed to the appropriate office or individual.
( c ) If you do not have accurate contact information for a Tribe, or the Tribe contacted fails to respond to written inquiries, you should seek assistance in contacting the Indian Tribe from the BIA local or regional office or the BIA's Central Office in Washington, DC (see *www.bia.gov*).
§ 170.437 If there is no hearing, how must BIA, FHWA, or a Tribe inform the public? ( a ) When no public hearing for a TTP project is scheduled, the BIA, FHWA, or a Tribe must give adequate notice to the public before project activities are scheduled to begin. The notice should include: ( 1 ) Project location;
( 2 ) Type of improvement planned;
( 3 ) Dates and schedule for work;
( 4 ) Name and address where more information is available; and
( 5 ) Provisions for requesting a hearing.
( b ) If the work is not to be performed by the Tribe, BIA will send a copy of the notice to the affected Tribe.
# C_2006182EN.01001102.xml

| 4.8.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 182/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.8.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 182/11

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4211 — Schmolz + Bickenbach/Ugitech)

(2006/C 182/10)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 3 July 2006, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in German and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4211. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://ec.europa.eu/eur-lex/lex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4211. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://ec.europa.eu/eur-lex/lex)

---
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 172 (Friday, September 5, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 53015]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-21186]

========================================================================
Notices
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains documents other than rules 
or proposed rules that are applicable to the public. Notices of hearings 
and investigations, committee meetings, agency decisions and rulings, 
delegations of authority, filing of petitions and applications and agency 
statements of organization and functions are examples of documents 
appearing in this section.

========================================================================


Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 172 / Friday, September 5, 2014 / 
Notices

[[Page 53015]]

AGENCY FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT

Notice of September 18 Advisory Committee on Voluntary Foreign 
Aid Meeting

AGENCY: United States Agency for International Development.

ACTION: Notice of Meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the Federal Advisory Committee Act, notice is 
hereby given of a meeting of the Advisory Committee on Voluntary 
Foreign Aid (ACVFA).
    Date: Thursday, September 18, 2014.
    Time: 2:00 p.m.-3:00 p.m.
    Location: Ronald Reagan Building, 1300 Pennsylvania Avenue, 
Washington, DC 20004.

Purpose

    The Advisory Committee on Voluntary Foreign Aid (ACVFA) brings 
together USAID and private voluntary organizations (PVO) officials, 
representatives from universities, international nongovernment 
organizations (NGOs), U.S. businesses, and government, multilateral, 
and private organizations to foster understanding, communication, and 
cooperation in the area of foreign aid.

Agenda

    USAID Administrator Rajiv Shah will make opening remarks, followed 
by panel discussions among ACVFA members and USAID leadership on the 
Global Development Lab. The full meeting agenda will be forthcoming on 
the ACVFA Web site at http://www.usaid.gov/who-we-are/organization/advisory-committee.

Stakeholders

    The meeting is free and open to the public. Persons wishing to 
attend should register online at http://ow.ly/wlC6G.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jayne Thomisee, 202-712-5506.

    Dated: August 28, 2014.
Jayne Thomisee,
Executive Director & Policy Advisor, U.S. Agency for International 
Development.
[FR Doc. 2014-21186 Filed 9-4-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
```
§ 161.605 What will a written notice of a permit violation contain? The written notice of a permit violation will provide the permittee with 10 days from the receipt of the written notice to: ( a ) Cure the permit violation and notify BIA that the violation is cured;
( b ) Explain why BIA should not cancel the permit;
( c ) Request in writing additional time to complete corrective actions. If additional time is granted, BIA may require that certain actions be taken immediately; or
( d ) Request mediation under § 161.603.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 347 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                      October 24, 2000.
Whereas Italians, like Amerigo Vespucci and Christopher Columbus, were some of 
        the first explorers to discover the American continents and illustrate 
        the geography;
Whereas Italians and Italian Americans have made great contributions to 
        America's society economically, culturally, and politically;
Whereas Italian Americans have won prestigious prizes, such as the Nobel Prize, 
        the Pritzker Award for architecture, and the Fields Medal for 
        mathematics;
Whereas Italians and Italian Americans invented pianos, violins, calendars, 
        radios, telescopes, compasses, microscopes, thermometers, eye glasses, 
        steam engines, typewriters, and batteries;
Whereas Italian Americans have toiled and labored while helping to build our 
        Nation's infrastructure, including railroads, tunnels, highways, and 
        subways;
Whereas a great many Americans have enjoyed the entertainment provided by 
        Italian Americans, such as Hall of Fame baseball player Joe DiMaggio, 
        singer and songwriter Frank Sinatra, world-renowned composer Henry 
        Mancini, and Oscar-winning actor Robert DeNiro;
Whereas great Italian American political figures, such as Fiorella La Guardia 
        (who was both Mayor of, then Congressman from, New York City), Anthony 
        Celebrezze (who, in the Kennedy administration, was the first Italian 
        American Cabinet member), and Antonin Scalia (who, in 1982, became the 
        first Italian American Supreme Court Justice), have enriched the 
        political process and brought national pride to our country;
Whereas over 5.4 million Italians immigrated to the United States between 1820 
        and 1991, which today has resulted in over 26 million Americans of 
        Italian descent in the United States, making them the fifth largest 
        ethnic group; and
Whereas the Massachusetts Legislature has designated the month of October as 
        ``Italian-American Heritage Month'' in Massachusetts: Now, therefore, be 
        it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives supports the goals and ideas of 
``Italian-American Heritage Month'' and recognizes the significant contributions 
that Italian Americans have made to the United States.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
Editorial Note on Part 224
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 224 appear at 84 FR 69611, Dec. 18, 2019.

§ 224.68 How will the Secretary use public comments? ( a ) The Secretary will review and consider public comments in deciding to approve or disapprove the final proposed TERA; and
( b ) The Secretary will provide copies of the comments to the Designated Tribal Official;
( c ) Upon mutual agreement between the Tribe and the Secretary, the Tribe may make changes in the final proposed TERA based on the comments received; and
( d ) If the Tribe revises the final proposed TERA based on public comments, the Tribal governing body must approve the changes, the authorized representative of the Tribe must sign the final proposed TERA as revised, and the Tribe must send the revised final proposed TERA to the Secretary.
[73 FR 12821, Mar. 10, 2008, as amended at 84 FR 69612, Dec. 18, 2019]
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 4 Agreed to House (ATH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 4

 Authorizing the Clerk to inform the President of the election of the 
                         Speaker and the Clerk.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 6, 1999

Mr. Armey submitted the following resolution; which was considered and 
                               agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Authorizing the Clerk to inform the President of the election of the 
                         Speaker and the Clerk.

    Resolved, That the Clerk be instructed to inform the President of 
the United States that the House of Representatives has elected J. 
Dennis Hastert, a Representative from the State of Illinois, Speaker; 
and Jeffrey J. Trandahl, a citizen of the Commonwealth of Virginia, 
Clerk of the House of Representatives of the One Hundred Sixth 
Congress.
                                 <all>
```
H. Res. 43

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

February 24, 1999.

Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule

XVIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee of the

Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of

the bill (H.R. 436) to reduce waste, fraud, and error in Government programs by making improvements with respect to

Federal management and debt collection practices, Federal

payment systems, Federal benefit programs, and for other

purposes. The first reading of the bill shall be dispensed with.

Points of order against consideration of the bill for failure to

comply with section 303 of the Congressional Budget Act of

1974 are waived. General debate shall be confined to the bill

and shall not exceed one hour equally divided and controlled

by the chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on Government Reform. After general debate the bill

shall be considered for amendment under the five-minute

rule. The bill shall be considered as read. During consideration of the bill for amendment, the Chairman of the Com-
2

•HRES 43 EH

mittee of the Whole may accord priority in recognition on the

basis of whether the Member offering an amendment has

caused it to be printed in the portion of the Congressional

Record designated for that purpose in clause 8 of rule XVIII.

Amendments so printed shall be considered as read. The

Chairman of the Committee of the Whole may: (1) postpone

until a time during further consideration in the Committee of

the Whole a request for a recorded vote on any amendment;

and (2) reduce to five minutes the minimum time for electronic voting on any postponed question that follows another

electronic vote without intervening business, provided that the

minimum time for electronic voting on the first in any series

of questions shall be 15 minutes. At the conclusion of consideration of the bill for amendment the Committee shall rise

and report the bill to the House with such amendments as

may have been adopted. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill and amendments thereto to

final passage without intervening motion except one motion

to recommit with or without instructions.

Attest:

Clerk.
### §9084. Office of the Chief of Space Operations: general duties

(a) Professional Assistance.—The Office of the Chief of Space Operations shall furnish professional assistance to the Secretary, the Under Secretary, and the Assistant Secretaries of the Air Force and to the Chief of Space Operations.

(b) Authorities.—Under the authority, direction, and control of the Secretary of the Air Force, the Office of the Chief of Space Operations shall—

(1) subject to subsections (c) and (d) of section 9014 of this title, prepare for such employment of the Space Force, and for such recruiting, organizing, supplying, equipping (including research and development), training, servicing, mobilizing, demobilizing, administering, and maintaining of the Space Force, as will assist in the execution of any power, duty, or function of the Secretary of the Air Force or the Chief of Space Operations;

(2) investigate and report upon the efficiency of the Space Force and its preparation to support military operations by commanders of the combatant commands;

(3) prepare detailed instructions for the execution of approved plans and supervise the execution of those plans and instructions;

(4) as directed by the Secretary of the Air Force or the Chief of Space Operations, coordinate the action of organizations of the Space Force; and

(5) perform such other duties, not otherwise assigned by law, as may be prescribed by the Secretary of the Air Force.

(Added Pub. L. 116–283, div. A, title IX, §921(a), Jan. 1, 2021, 134 Stat. 3805.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Another section 9084 was renumbered section 9086 of this title.

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 9084 was successively renumbered section 9068, then 9083, of this title by Pub. L. 116–92, §952(b)(1), (e).
[No. 4310.]

#### Greig v. Elliott et al.

Appellate Practice—Final Judgment—Pleading.

Where a complaint purports to state two causes of action but the subject matter of controversy is the same in each and a demurrer is sustained to one cause of action, leaving the other cause standing, the ruling sustaining the demurrer is not such final judgment as is reviewable on error while the other cause of action remains undecided.

*Error to the District Court of San Miguel*Co.

Mr. W. H. Tripp, for plaintiff in error.

Mr. H. M. Hogg, for defendant in error.

*Per*Curiam.

In the complaint filed by plaintiff in error in the court below he purports to state two causes of action. In each the subject matter of controversy—certain real estate—is the same. A general demurrer to the second cause of action was sustained, and plaintiff having elected to stand by this cause-as pleaded, it was dismissed. The first cause of action is still undisposed of. He has brought here for review on error the action of the court in sustaining the demurrer to, and dismissing, his second cause of action. The defendants move to dismiss.

The subject matter of controversy is identical in each cause of action. The rights of the parties to the realty in dispute are as yet dependent upon the judgment which the court may render in the first cause of action. Therefore, the judgment of which plaintiff complains is not *final—Dusing v.*Nelson, 7 Colo. 184—and hence, not reviewable on error at this time. Mills’ Ann. Code § 406.

The motion to dismiss is sustained.

*Dismissed*
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 391 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                     November 18, 1999.
    Resolved, That the following named Member be, and is hereby, elected to the 
following standing committees of the House of Representatives:
    Committee on Agriculture: Mr. Baca of California.
    Committee on Science: Mr. Baca of California.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Guidance Document Database 
-  Death Benefits 

This page has not been translated. Please go to PBGC.gov's Spanish home page for more information available in Spanish.

Esta página no ha sido traducida. Por favor vaya a la página principal del sitio de español de PBGC para ver información disponible en español.

# Death benefits

                  -  Opinion Letter 76-103
PBGC’s position on guaranty of death benefit.
-               document
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-30003 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus JAMES G. “JERRY” LABARBA, SR., Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana

USDC No. 99-CR-50103-1

-------------------- October 1, 2001 Before DeMOSS, PARKER, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * James G. “Jerry” LaBarba, Sr., appeals his jury convictions for conspiring to commit bank fraud and to misapply bank funds and aiding and abetting bank fraud. He argues that the district court erred in excluding proffered evidence of a work-out agreement between him and the defrauded bank. After reviewing the record and the briefs of the parties, we hold that the district court did not abuse its broad discretion in excluding the evidence as being irrelevant to LaBarba’s intent and, in any event, did not abuse its discretion in excluding the evidenceNo. 01-30003 -2- under Federal Rule of Evidence 403. See United States v. Waldrip , 981 F.2d 799, 806 (5th Cir. 1993); United States v. Tidwell , 559 F.2d 262, 265-67 (5th Cir. 1977). AFFIRMED.
§ 225.29 Corporate qualifications and requests for information. ( a ) The signing in a representative capacity of minerals agreements or assignments, bonds, or other instruments required by a minerals agreement or these regulations, constitutes certification that the individual signing (except a surety agent) is authorized to act in such a capacity. An agent for a surety shall furnish a power of attorney.
( b ) A prospective corporate operator proposing to acquire an interest in a minerals agreement shall have on file with the Superintendent a statement showing: ( 1 ) The State(s) in which the corporation is incorporated, and a notarized statement that the corporation is authorized to hold such interests in the State where the land described in the minerals agreement is situated; and
( 2 ) A notarized statement that it has power to conduct all business and operations as described in the minerals agreement.
( c ) The Secretary may, either before or after the approval of a minerals agreement, assignment, or bond, call for any reasonable additional information necessary to carry out the regulations in this part, or other applicable laws and regulations.