alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Samuel E. Barrett *et al. v.*Elijah S. Alexander.

1. New *trial—verdict against the evidence.*In this case the preponderance of the testimony was considered to be in favor of the appellee, and the judgment was affirmed.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. Erastus S. Williams, Judge, presiding.

The opinion states the case.

Mr. J. Y. LeMoyne and Mr. Jesse O. Norton, for the appellants.

*119Messrs. Hitchcock, Dupee & Evarts, for the appellee.

Mr. Justice Lawrence

delivered the opinion of the Court:

This case has been already before this court, and is reported in 46 Ill. 226. We there stated the facts as then presented by the record, and our conclusion in regard to them. The case has since been re-tried, the parties having become witnesses since the former trial. They contradict each other in their testimony, and in other respects the record presents substantially the same facts as in the former trial. The court, a jury having been waived, found for the plaintiff, and we can not say that the finding is against the evidence. The case for the plaintiff is not as clear as it was before, but we are still of opinion the preponderance of the testimony is in his favor, or at least that it is so nearly balanced as not to justify us in disturbing the finding, of the court.

*Judgment affirmed.*
##### 



Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the
undersigned, as chief financial officer of Iron Age Corporation (the
Company), does hereby certify that to the undersigneds knowledge:



| | 3) |  | the Companys 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
| | -- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | 4) |  | the information contained in the Companys 10-Q fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.



| | /s/ Bart R. Huchel
Bart R. Huchel
Chief Financial Officer, Vice President - Finance and Treasurer
| | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: September 9, 2003

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and forwarded to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

May 27, 2015

N o. 04

- 14

- 00898

- CV

IN THE ESTATE OF RAMIRO AGUILAR, JR.,

From the Probate Court No 2, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2012

- PC

- 2800

Honorable Gladys B. Burwell, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Appellee’s motion for extension of time is GRANTED. Appellee’s brief is due Ju ly 20,

2015.

_________________________________ Karen Angelini, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 27th day of May, 2015

.

____ _______________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
### §2917. Development of geothermal energy on military lands

(a) Development Authorized.—The Secretary of a military department may develop, or authorize the development of, any geothermal energy resource within lands under the Secretary's jurisdiction, including public lands, for the use or benefit of the Department of Defense if that development is in the public interest, as determined by the Secretary concerned, and will not deter commercial development and use of other portions of such resource if offered for leasing.

(b) Consideration of Energy Security.—The development of a geothermal energy project under subsection (a) should include consideration of energy security in the design and development of the project.

(Added Pub. L. 97–214, §6(c)(1), July 12, 1982, 96 Stat. 172, §2689; renumbered §2917, Pub. L. 109–364, div. B, title XXVIII, §2851(b)(1), Oct. 17, 2006, 120 Stat. 2494; amended Pub. L. 112–81, div. B, title XXVIII, §2822(c), Dec. 31, 2011, 125 Stat. 1692.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2011—Pub. L. 112–81 designated existing provisions as subsec. (a), inserted heading, and added subsec. (b).

2006—Pub. L. 109–364 renumbered section 2689 of this title as this section.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Oct. 1, 1982, and applicable to military construction projects, and to construction and acquisition of military family housing authorized before, on, or after such date, see section 12(a) of Pub. L. 97–214, set out as a note under section 2801 of this title.
[Nos. 4726, 4727.]

#### The Board of County Commissioners of Teller County v. The Pinnacle Gold Mining Company, a Corporation. M. B. Lysight, County Assessor, and the Board of County Commissioners of Teller County, Colorado, v. The C. K. & M. Mining Company, a Corporation.

Taxation — Courts — County Commissioners — Assessors—Erroneous Assessments — Appeals.

The statute concerning appeals to the district court from the assessor and from the hoard of county commissioners, is similar to the previous law upon this subject passed in 1889, and no provision is made therein for an appeal from the district court. —P. 493.

*Appeals from the District Court of Teller County.*

*Hoñ. Robert E. Lewis, Judge.*

Appeal by tbe,board of county commissioners of Teller county, in tbe first ease, and by M. B. Lysigbt, county assessor, in' tbe second case, from tbe judgment of tbe district court reducing tbe assessments of The Pinnacle Gold Mining Company.

Decision *en banc.*

*Dismissed.*

Mr. C. S’. Thomas and Mr. Scott Ashton, for appellants.

Messrs. McAllister & Gandy, for appellees.

*493Mr. Justice Bailey

delivered the opinion of the court:

The above cases are two of a series involving-identical issues.

One of the appellees filed a petition with the board of county commissioners of Teller county, praying for relief against what they deemed to be an unjust and excessive valuation placed by the assessor upon their nonproductive mining claims in Teller county. The commissioners refused to interfere with the assessment, and the case was -taken to the district court of that county by appeal.

The other appellee filed a like petition directly with the district court, and by stipulation the cases were tried together. The district court reduced the assessment made by the assessor, and the board of commissioners and the assessor bring the actions here upon appeal.

This court has not jurisdiction to entertain this appeal.

The statute concerning appeals to the district court from the assessor and from the board of county commissioners is similar to the previous law upon this subject, passed in 1889. There is no provision for an appeal from the district court.

This question was before the court of appeals in the case of *The Pilgrim Consolidated Mining Co. v. The Board of County Commissioners of Teller Coun*ty, 20 Colo. App. 311, and that court, in a very carefully prepared opinion, determined that neither appeal nor writ of error would lie from the judgment of the district court. We are inclined fi> follow the opinion of the court of appeals.

There have been a number of similar cases brought to this court and to the court of appeals, either upon appeal or writ of error, in which the action of the district court has been reviewed.

*494These cases afford no precedent by which-we aré to be controlled, the question of jurisdiction not having been raised ór brought to1 the attention of the court.

For the reasons above set forth, these actions will be dismissed by the court, upon its own motion, for lack of jurisdiction to entertain the appeal.

Decision *en banc.*

*Dismissed.*
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Misawa, Kadena Airmen Strengthen Bilateral Ties 

By Senior Airman Brittany A. Chase

**MISAWA AIR BASE, Japan (AFNS) -- **

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More News/Aricles
'AA. · ZO'~ ~ Ol\ 05 

Sent on Behalf of Christopher McCann: 

I am responding to the letter I have received. I have spoken to my legal counsel 

because the sequence of events that have been presented to me are far exaggerated 

and have in many cases, shown a blatant disregard for the truth. I am requesting the 

following options which I have been requested to choose from: 

1. I am requesting a formal hearing because aspects of the proposed sequence are 

blatantly false. Please identified immediately the individual person who has made 

these accusations pertaining to the sequence of the events because at this current 

date correspondence I have recei~ed from the Regional Counsel hf failed !o state .. 

my accuser's full name. L.oco.tiOA Re.t-"-"-"'s+·: "S<i-. L le,v i f\/\.,v"'!e 1>o~ 

2. I have and can demonstrate financial harship. You have permission to notify me of 

reasonable documents that are required to provide to demonstrate this, at which time 

I will turn all correspondence over to my legal counsel. 
RECEIVED 

JUN 2 5 2014 

HEARING DOCKET 
Sent on Behalf of Christopher McCann: 

3. During this experience I felt strongly discriminated against because of my race. I am 

of Hispanic descent and my father's name is Carlos Medina Garcia. I have black hair, 

dark brown eyes and tan skin (especially during the summer months which was when 

this experience occurred). Because of the racial discrimination that I received, I have 

spoken with my legal counsel and am prepared to pursue this act of inequality to the 

full extent of the law should the need arise. 

Date:-=\£-' (' ._/_ Cj' . .J_. _L_!_Lf___ ~, 2c 

Signature of Christopher McCann: -t{r/),,1,.'-14-'-,-· -~~>"/_:;J0_.·~¥c·~'""'~-':._(_·'-=·'>-"'-------- / "-'' 
RECEIVED 

JUN 2 5 2014 

HEAHING DOCKET 
I --=: 

ru 

D 

,... 

'"" '() 

,... 

D 

D 

'"" D 

D 

D 

D 

'"" f'-

'"" fT1 

'"" D 

f'-

{\ 

\/ 

@ 

.. 

en ~ 

0 (!) 

1!J ttl 

:a; 

~ 

- "0 <: 

(!) 

cu E 

::r 

CD (,) 

() 

a: . 

Cl
#### § 212.49 Restrictions on operations.

The provisions of § 211.49 of this subchapter are applicable to leases under this part.
# C_2013023EN.01001101.xml

| 25.1.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 23/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.1.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 23/11

---

Notice of the expiry of certain anti-dumping measures

2013/C 23/07

Further to the publication of a notice of impending expiry (1) following which no duly substantiated request for a review was lodged, the Commission gives notice that the anti-dumping measure mentioned below will shortly expire.

1

This notice is published in accordance with Article 11(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 of 30 November 2009 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community (2).

2

| Product | Country(ies) of origin or exportation | Measures | Reference | Date of expiry (3) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Dihydromyrcenol | India | Anti-dumping duty | Council Regulation (EC) No 63/2008 (OJ L 23, 26.1.2008, p. 1) | 27.1.2013 |

Product

Country(ies) of origin or exportation

Measures

Reference

Date of expiry (3)

3

Dihydromyrcenol

India

Anti-dumping duty

Council Regulation (EC) No 63/2008 (OJ L 23, 26.1.2008, p. 1)

27.1.2013

---

(1)  OJ C 135, 9.5.2012, p. 20.

1

(2)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 51.

2

(3)  The measure expires at midnight of the day mentioned in this column.

3

---
#### § 170.606 How do legislation and procurement requirements affect the TTP?

Other legislation and procurement requirements apply to the TTP as shown in the following table:

| Legislation, regulation or other requirement | Applies to Tribes under self-
determination
contracts | Applies to Tribes under self-
governance
agreements | Applies to Tribes under BIA or FHWA program agreements | Applies to
activities
performed by the Secretary |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Buy Indian Act | No | No | No | Yes. |
| Buy American Act | No | No | No | Yes. |
| Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) | No(a) | No | No | Yes. |
| Federal Tort Claims Act | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes. |
| Davis-Bacon Act | Yes(b) | Yes(b) | Yes(b) | Yes. |

(a) Unless agreed to by the Tribe or Tribal organization under ISDEAA, 25 U.S.C. 450j(a), and 25 CFR 900.115.

(b) Does not apply when Tribe performs work with its own employees.
Certification of CEO and CFO Pursuant to


18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


as Adopted Pursuant to


Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q of Knight Trading Group, Inc. (the Company) for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Thomas Joyce, as Chief Executive Officer
of the Company, and Robert Turner, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:





(1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)    The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/    THOMAS JOYCEName: Thomas Joyce Title:
Chief Executive Officer Date: August 14, 2002





/s/    ROBERT
TURNERName: Robert Turner Title:
Chief Financial Officer Date: August 14, 2002





This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to § 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.




1
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News

Green Dot to Roll Out Across the Air ForceDecember 31, 2015 — WASHINGTON (AFNS) --  Airmen will take the first step of a five-year strategy to decrease interpersonal violence across the service in January when 1,500 Airman implementers attend one of 22 Green... MORE 

----

2024 (327)2023 (825)2022 (1193)2021 (1066)2020 (1083)2019 (1166)2018 (1116)2017 (1356)2016 (1475)2015 (1408)2014 (904)2013 (32)2012 (4)

About DoDDoD CareersJoin the MilitaryNewsUSA.govPhotos & VideosPrivacy & SecurityTop Issues

US INDOPACOM Inspector GeneralDoD Inspector General Accessibility/Section 508DoD FOIAUS INDOPACOM FOIALink DisclaimerNo FEAR ActRecovery ActINDOPACOM Webmaster

                  - Facebook
                  - X
                  - YouTube
                  - Instagram
                  - RSS

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
§ 247.18 What are the sanitation prohibitions? ( a ) You cannot deposit in any toilet, toilet vault, or plumbing fixture anything that could damage or interfere with the operation or maintenance of the fixture.
( b ) You must dispose of all garbage, including any paper, cans, bottle, sewage, waste water or material, either by removal from the site, or by depositing it into receptacles or at places provided for such purposes.
( c ) You may not bring refuse, debris, or toxic or hazardous materials to the sites for disposal.
( d ) All toxic or hazardous materials must be properly removed from the sites. You may not dispose of such materials in a sewer line, tank, drain, storm drain, or on the ground.
( e ) You must not place in or near the river or other water any substance that pollutes or may pollute the water.
( f ) If dumping stations are not available, you must transport sewage off site.
### §1607. Intelligence Senior Level positions

(a) Designation of Positions.—The Secretary of Defense may designate as an Intelligence Senior Level position any defense intelligence position that, as determined by the Secretary—

(1) is classifiable above grade GS–15 of the General Schedule;

(2) does not satisfy functional or program management criteria for being designated a Defense Intelligence Senior Executive Service position; and

(3) has no more than minimal supervisory responsibilities.

(b) Regulations.—Subsection (a) shall be carried out in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of Defense.

(c) Award of Rank to Employees in Intelligence Senior Level Positions.—The President, based on the recommendations of the Secretary of Defense, may award a rank referred to in section 4507a of title 5 to employees in Intelligence Senior Level positions designated under subsection (a). The award of such rank shall be made in a manner consistent with the provisions of that section.

(Added Pub. L. 104–201, div. A, title XVI, §1632(b), Sept. 23, 1996, 110 Stat. 2747; amended Pub. L. 107–306, title V, §503, Nov. 27, 2002, 116 Stat. 2407.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Grade GS–15 of the General Schedule, referred to in subsec. (a)(1), is set out under section 5332 of Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 1607 was renumbered section 424 of this title.

Provisions similar to those in this section were contained in section 1604(f)(1), (3) of this title prior to repeal by Pub. L. 104–201, §1632(a)(3).

#### Amendments

2002—Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 107–306 added subsec. (c).

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Oct. 1, 1996, see section 1635 of Pub. L. 104–201, set out as an Effective Date of 1996 Amendment note under section 1593 of this title.
#### § 20.335 What is the payment standard for Adult Care Assistance?

The approved payment for adult care assistance will not exceed the applicable state payment rate for similar care.

[65 FR 63159, Oct. 20, 2000; 65 FR 76563, Dec. 7, 2000]
### **CHAPTER 757—SCHOOLS AND CAMPS**

Sec.
7481.
Establishment: purpose.
7482.
Operation.
7483.
Transportation and subsistence during travel.
7484.
Quartermaster and ordnance property: sales.
7486.
Academy of Health Sciences: admission of civilians in physician assistant training program.
7487.
United States Army War College: acceptance of grants for faculty research for scientific, literary, and educational purposes.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**2018**—Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, §808(e)(3), (f)(1), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1839, redesignated chapter 407 of this title as this chapter and items 4411 to 4417 as 7481 to 7487, respectively.

**2006**—Pub. L. 109–163, div. A, title V, §522(b)(2), Jan. 6, 2006, 119 Stat. 3241, added item 4417.

**2000**—Pub. L. 106–398, §1 [[div. A], title IX, §911(c)(2)], Oct. 30, 2000, 114 Stat. 1654, 1654A–228, struck out item 4415 "United States Army School of the Americas".

**1997**—Pub. L. 105–85, div. A, title VII, §741(a)(2), Nov. 18, 1997, 111 Stat. 1817, added item 4416.

**1987**—Pub. L. 100–180, div. A, title III, §319(a)(2), Dec. 4, 1987, 101 Stat. 1077, added item 4415.
445 12th Street SW

Washington, DC 20024-2101

202-229-4040

PBGC.gov

FISCAL YEAR 2022 QUARTER Q1 FOIA REPORT

October 1, 2021 – December 31, 2021

Number of Requests 

Received

Number of Requests 

Processed

Number of Requests 

Backlogged

1127 1035 28