alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 99.2





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER





In connection with the Quarterly Report
of Hudson Respiratory Care Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Periodic Report), I, Patrick G. Yount, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, to my knowledge, that:





| | 1. |  | The Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




| | 2. |  | The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




/s/    PATRICK G. YOUNTPatrick G. Yount Chief Financial
Officer November 14, 2002
Exhibit 15.1



CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC
ACCOUNTING FIRM



We consent to the incorporation by reference
in the Registration Statement on Form F-3 (No. 333 - 199033 and No. 333 - 195124), pertaining to Can-Fite Biopharma Ltd. of our
report dated March 27, 2015 with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Can-Fite Biopharma Ltd. and its subsidiary,
included in this Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2014.





|                 | /s/ Kost Forer Gabbay & Kasierer
|---------------- | --------------------------------
|Tel-Aviv, Israel | KOST FORER GABBAY & KASIERER    
|March 27, 2015   | A Member of Ernst & Young Global
# C_2014003EN.01000101.xml

| 8.1.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 3/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.1.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 3/1

---

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the TFEU

Cases where the Commission raises no objections

(Text with EEA relevance)

2014/C 3/01

| Date of adoption of the decision | 22.10.2013 |
| --- | --- |
| Reference number of State Aid | SA.35678 (12/N) |
| Member State | Italy |
| Region | Lazio | — |
| Title (and/or name of the beneficiary) | Interventi regionali in materia di cinema ed audiovisivo (articolo 26 comma 3 della legge regionale 13 aprile 2012, n. 2) |
| Legal basis | Legge regionale n. 2/2012 «Interventi regionali per lo sviluppo del cinema e dell'audiovisivo» pubblicata sul BURL n. 16 del 28 aprile 2012; Deliberazione della Giunta regionale n. 509 del 17 ottobre 2012«Interventi regionali in materia di cinema ed audiovisivo (ex articolo comma 3 dell'articolo 26 della legge regionale 13 aprile 2012 n. 2 ...» |
| Type of measure | Scheme | — |
| Objective | Culture |
| Form of aid | Direct grant |
| Budget | | Overall budget: EUR 15 million |

Date of adoption of the decision

22.10.2013

Reference number of State Aid

SA.35678 (12/N)

Member State

Italy

Region

Lazio

—

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

Interventi regionali in materia di cinema ed audiovisivo (articolo 26 comma 3 della legge regionale 13 aprile 2012, n. 2)

Legal basis

Legge regionale n. 2/2012 «Interventi regionali per lo sviluppo del cinema e dell'audiovisivo» pubblicata sul BURL n. 16 del 28 aprile 2012; Deliberazione della Giunta regionale n. 509 del 17 ottobre 2012«Interventi regionali in materia di cinema ed audiovisivo (ex articolo comma 3 dell'articolo 26 della legge regionale 13 aprile 2012 n. 2 ...»

Type of measure

Scheme

—

Objective

Culture

Form of aid

Direct grant

Budget

Overall budget: EUR 15 million

| | Annual budget: EUR 15 million |
| --- | --- |

Annual budget: EUR 15 million

Intensity

50 %

Duration (period)

Until 31.12.2013

Economic sectors

Motion picture, video and television programme production, sound recording and music publishing activities

Name and address of the granting authority

| Regione Lazio |
| --- |
| Via C. Colombo 212 |
| 00147 Roma RM |
| ITALIA |

Regione Lazio

Via C. Colombo 212

00147 Roma RM

ITALIA

Other information

—

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

http://ec.europa.eu/competition/elojade/isef/index.cfm

---
# C_2006187EN.01001801.xml

| 10.8.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 187/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.8.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 187/18

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4048 — Sonae Industria/Tarkett/JV)

(2006/C 187/07)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 12 June 2006, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4048. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://ec.europa.eu/eur-lex/lex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4048. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://ec.europa.eu/eur-lex/lex)

---
# Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed June 6, 2018.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D17-150

Lower Tribunal No. 15-17377

________________



### Gian Franco Martinez, etc.,

Appellant,

vs.



### Juan Fernandez-Uriate

, Appellee.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Bernard S.

Shapiro

, Judge.

Hasbun & Mendoza, PLLC, and Maribel Mendoza

, for appellant.

Perez-Abreu & Martin-Lavielle, P.A., Andy W. Acosta and Javier PerezAbreu

, for appellee.

Before SALTER, FERNANDEZ and SCALES, JJ.

FERNANDEZ, J.

Gian Franco Martinez (“Appellant”), as personal representative of the estate

of Helen Doris Fernandez (the deceased former “Wife”), appeals the lower court’sDecember 14, 2016 order of dismissal for lack of prosecution and the trial court’s

determination that the Wife’s counsel failed to timely move for a substitution of

party in accordance with Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.260(a)(1). On July 10,

2015, the Wife filed a Petition for Dissolution of Marriage and Other Relief

Without Dependent or Minor Children. On October 5, 2015, the Wife passed away.

On October 10, 2016, Juan Fernandez-Uriate (“Appellee” and the former

husband) filed a Notice of Lack of Prosecution. On November 16, 2016, the

Wife’s counsel simultaneously filed a suggestion of death and a motion for

substitution of party seeking to substitute Appellant in her stead. The lower court

entered its dismissal order on December 15, 2016. This appeal followed.

Appellant argues the trial court erred in dismissing the cause. We agree and

reverse.

First, the lower court erred in dismissing the cause for failure to timely move

for substitution. Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.260(a)(1) provides a 90-day

period for filing a motion for substitution, after a suggestion of death is both filed

on the record and served pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516.

Feller v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.

, No. 3D16-2389, 43 Fla. L. Weekly D392, *3

(Fla. 3d DCA February 14, 2018) (internal citations omitted). Here, the suggestion

of death and motion for substitution were filed and served on the same day, and

thus the motion for substitution was filed within the applicable 90-day period.

2Therefore, there can be no dispute that the motion for substitution was timely filed

and rule 1.260(a)(1) cannot be a basis for dismissal.

Second, the lower court erred in dismissing the cause for lack of

prosecution. Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.420(e) provides that after a

compliant service of notice of no record activity, if “no record activity occurs

within the 60 days immediately following the service of such notice, and if no stay

was issued

. . . the action shall be dismissed.” Here, record activity occurred

within the 60 days immediately following the service of the Notice of Lack of

Prosecution. Therefore, rule 1.420(e) cannot be a basis for dismissal.

For the foregoing reasons, the lower court’s December 15, 2016 dismissal

order is reversed and the cause is remanded for further proceedings.

Reversed and remanded.

3
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 394 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                     November 18, 1999.
    Resolved, That the bill of the Senate (S. 1232) entitled the ``Federal 
Erroneous Retirement Coverage Corrections Act'', in the opinion of this House, 
contravenes the first clause of the seventh section of the first article of the 
Constitution of the United States and is an infringement of the privileges of 
this House and that such bill be respectfully returned to the Senate with a 
message communicating this resolution.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**

 

**OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Pacific Coast Oil Trust (the “Trust”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, not in its individual capacity but solely as the Trustee of the Trust, certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to its knowledge:

 

(1)         The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2)         The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.

 

The above certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.

 
|                     | The Bank of New York Mellon Trust   Company, N.A., Trustee for Pacific Coast Oil Trust |
|--------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                     |                                                                                   |   |
| Date: March 8, 2019 | By:                                                                                    | /s/ SARAH NEWELL |
|                     |                                                                                   | Sarah Newell |
| * *                 | * *                                                                               | *Vice President and   Trust Officer* |

 

----
# C_2006165EN.01002503.xml

| 15.7.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 165/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.7.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 165/25

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 10 May 2006 — Air One SpA v Commission of the European Communities

(Case T-395/04) (1)

1

(State aid - Air transport - Complaint - Failure by the Commission to define its position - Action for failure to act - Time-limit - Admissibility)

(2006/C 165/49)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Air One SpA (Chieti, Italy) (represented by: G. Belotti and M. Padellaro, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: V. Di Bucci and E. Righini, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Application Action under Article 232 EC for a declaration that the Commission has unlawfully failed to define its position on the applicant's complaint concerning aid granted to the air carrier Ryanair by the Italian authorities

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders the applicant to pay the costs |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the applicant to pay the costs

---

(1)  OJ C 300, 4.12.2004.

1

---
Exhibit 99





Certification of CEO and CFO Pursuant to


18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


as Adopted Pursuant to


Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Knight Trading Group, Inc. (the Company) for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2002 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Thomas Joyce, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Robert Turner, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:





| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or, 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




/S/    THOMAS M.
JOYCEName:

Thomas M. JoyceTitle:

Chief Executive OfficerDate:

November 11, 2002





/S/    ROBERT I.
TURNERName:

Robert I. TurnerTitle:

Chief Financial OfficerDate:

November 11, 2002
§ 175.205 When are BIA rates and fees reviewed? We review our rates and fees at least annually to: ( a ) Determine if our financial requirements are being met to ensure the reliable operation of the utility serving you; and
( b ) Determine if revenues are sufficient to meet the statutory requirements.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News

USAF, ROKAF join forces for Herk Guardians 23October 20, 2023 — United States Air Force representatives from Yokota Air Base, Japan, met Republic of Korea Air Force counterparts at Gimhae Air Base, South Korea, for a week of tactical airlift training and cultural exchange as part of Herk Guardians 23, Oct. 9–13... MORE 

----

Pitch Black 2022 Concludes International Interoperability ExerciseSeptember 13, 2022 — DARWIN, Australia – Approximately 110 U.S. Airmen from Pacific Air Forces participated in Exercise Pitch Black 2022, the Royal Australian Air Force (RAAF) Chief of Air Force’s biennial capstone... MORE 

----

2024 (327)2023 (825)2022 (1193)2021 (1066)2020 (1083)2019 (1166)2018 (1116)2017 (1356)2016 (1475)2015 (1408)2014 (904)2013 (32)2012 (4)

About DoDDoD CareersJoin the MilitaryNewsUSA.govPhotos & VideosPrivacy & SecurityTop Issues

US INDOPACOM Inspector GeneralDoD Inspector General Accessibility/Section 508DoD FOIAUS INDOPACOM FOIALink DisclaimerNo FEAR ActRecovery ActINDOPACOM Webmaster

                  - Facebook
                  - X
                  - YouTube
                  - Instagram
                  - RSS

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
#### § 1000.161 What is a self-governance compact?

A self-governance compact is an executed document that affirms the government-to-government relationship between a self-governance Tribe and the United States. The compact differs from an AFA in that parts of the compact apply to all bureaus within the Department of the Interior rather than a single bureau.
### §896. Art. 96. Release of prisoner without authority; drinking with prisoner

(a) Release of Prisoner Without Authority.—Any person subject to this chapter—

(1) who, without authority to do so, releases a prisoner; or

(2) who, through neglect or design, allows a prisoner to escape;

shall be punished as a court-martial may direct, whether or not the prisoner was committed in strict compliance with the law.

(b) Drinking With Prisoner.—Any person subject to this chapter who unlawfully drinks any alcoholic beverage with a prisoner shall be punished as a court-martial may direct.

(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 69; Pub. L. 114–328, div. E, title LX, §5413, Dec. 23, 2016, 130 Stat. 2944.)

| Revised section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 896 | 50:690. | May 5, 1950, ch. 169, §1 (Art. 96), 64 Stat. 136. |

The words "whether or not the prisoner was committed in strict compliance with law" are substituted for the word "duly", to reflect the long standing construction expressed in the Manual for Courts-Martial, United States, 1951, par. 175a.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2016—Pub. L. 114–328 amended section generally. Prior to amendment, text read as follows: "Any person subject to this chapter who, without proper authority, releases any prisoner committed to his charge, or who through neglect or design suffers any such prisoner to escape, shall be punished as a court-martial may direct, whether or not the prisoner was committed in strict compliance with law."

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2016 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 114–328 effective on Jan. 1, 2019, as designated by the President, with implementing regulations and provisions relating to applicability to various situations, see section 5542 of Pub. L. 114–328 and Ex. Ord. No. 13825, set out as notes under section 801 of this title.
### §821. Art. 21. Jurisdiction of courts-martial not exclusive

The provisions of this chapter conferring jurisdiction upon courts-martial do not deprive military commissions, provost courts, or other military tribunals of concurrent jurisdiction with respect to offenders or offenses that by statute or by the law of war may be tried by military commissions, provost courts, or other military tribunals. This section does not apply to a military commission established under chapter 47A of this title.

(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 44; Pub. L. 109–366, §4(a)(2), Oct. 17, 2006, 120 Stat. 2631.)

| Revised section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 821 | 50:581. | May 5, 1950, ch. 169, §1 (Art. 21), 64 Stat. 115. |

The words "do not deprive" are substituted for the words "shall not be construed as depriving". The words "with respect to" are substituted for the words "in respect of".

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2006—Pub. L. 109–366 inserted last sentence.
# C_2014035EN.01000301.xml

| 6.2.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 35/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.2.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 35/3

---

Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries

2014/C 35/03

In accordance with Article 35(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), a decision has been taken to close the fishery as set down in the following table:

1

| Date and time of closure | 10.12.2013 |
| --- | --- |
| Duration | 10.12.2013-31.12.2013 |
| Member State | The Netherlands |
| Stock or group of stocks | SRX/07D. |
| Species | Skates and rays (Rajiformes) |
| Zone | EU waters of VIId |
| Type(s) of fishing vessels | — |
| Reference number | 85/TQ39 |

Date and time of closure

10.12.2013

Duration

10.12.2013-31.12.2013

Member State

The Netherlands

Stock or group of stocks

SRX/07D.

Species

Skates and rays (Rajiformes)

Rajiformes

Zone

EU waters of VIId

Type(s) of fishing vessels

—

Reference number

85/TQ39

---

(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.

1

---
§ 273.116 Does an Indian Education Committee need to establish procedures and report to the BIE Director? The Indian Education Committee and its members must establish procedures under which the Committee serves. Such procedures must be set forth in the Committee's organizational documents and by-laws. ( a ) Each Committee must file a copy of its organizational documents and by-laws with the BIE Director, together with a list of its officers and members.
( b ) The existence of an Indian Education Committee may not limit the continuing participation of the rest of the Indian community in all aspects of programs contracted under this part.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# US, Republic of Korea Sailors Volunteer Together to Support Busan Community

By Petty Officer 3rd Class Jermaine Ralliford

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More News/Articles