alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 162.424 Must a business lease specify who receives monetary compensation payments? ( a ) A business lease must specify whether the lessee will make payments directly to the Indian landowners (direct pay) or to us on their behalf.
( b ) The lessee may make payments directly to the Indian landowners if: ( 1 ) The Indian landowners' trust accounts are unencumbered;
( 2 ) There are 10 or fewer beneficial owners; and
( 3 ) One hundred percent of the beneficial owners (including those on whose behalf we have consented) agree to receive payment directly from the lessee at the start of the lease.
( c ) If the lease provides that the lessee will directly pay the Indian landowners, then: ( 1 ) The lease must include provisions for proof of payment upon our request.
( 2 ) When we consent on behalf of an Indian landowner, the lessee must make payment to us on behalf of that landowner.
( 3 ) The lessee must send direct payments to the parties and addresses specified in the lease, unless the lessee receives notice of a change of ownership or address.
( 4 ) Unless the lease provides otherwise, compensation payments may not be made payable directly to anyone other than the Indian landowners.
( 5 ) Direct payments must continue through the duration of the lease, except that: ( i ) The lessee must make all Indian landowners' payments to us if 100 percent of the Indian landowners agree to suspend direct pay and provide us with documentation of their agreement; and
( ii ) The lessee must make that individual Indian landowner's payment to us if any individual Indian landowner who dies, is declared non compos mentis, owes a debt resulting in a trust account encumbrance, or his or her whereabouts become unknown.
### §2578. Vessels: transfer between departments

A vessel under the jurisdiction of a military department may be transferred or otherwise made available without reimbursement to another military department or to the Department of Homeland Security, and a vessel under the jurisdiction of the Department of Homeland Security may be transferred or otherwise made available without reimbursement to a military department. Any such transfer may be made only upon the request of the Secretary of the military department concerned or the Secretary of Homeland Security, as the case may be, and with the approval of the Secretary of the department having jurisdiction of the vessel.

(Added Pub. L. 100–370, §1(k)(1), July 19, 1988, 102 Stat. 848; amended Pub. L. 107–296, title XVII, §1704(b)(1), Nov. 25, 2002, 116 Stat. 2314.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Section is based on Pub. L. 99–190, §101(b) [title VIII, §8012], Dec. 19, 1985, 99 Stat. 1185, 1204.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2002—Pub. L. 107–296 substituted "of Homeland Security" for "of Transportation" wherever appearing.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2002 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 107–296 effective on the date of transfer of the Coast Guard to the Department of Homeland Security, see section 1704(g) of Pub. L. 107–296, set out as a note under section 101 of this title.
Statement Pursuant to Section
906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

The undersigned, Richard Rubin, CEO, CFO and
Chairman of Peregrine Industries, Inc, a Florida corporation, hereby makes the following
certification as required by Section 906(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, with
respect to the following of this report filed pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934: Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2009.

The undersigned certifies that the above
quarterly report fully complies with the requirements of Section 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, and information contained in the above report fairly presents, in
all respects, the financial condition of Peregrine Industries, Inc. and results of its
operations.

Date: May 20, 2009/s/ Richard RubinCEO, CFO and Chairman
#### § 212.8 Government employees cannot acquire leases.

U.S. Government employees are prevented from acquiring leases or interests in leases by the provisions of 25 CFR part 140 and 43 CFR part 20 pertaining to conflicts of interest and ownership of an interest in trust land.
# C_2017443EN.01022301.xml

| 22.12.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 443/223 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.12.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 443/223

---

P7_TA(2014)0371

Bio-Based Industries Joint Undertaking *

European Parliament legislative resolution of 15 April 2014 on the proposal for a Council regulation on the Bio-Based Industries Joint Undertaking (COM(2013)0496 — C7-0257/2013 — 2013/0241(NLE))

(Consultation)

(2017/C 443/52)

The European Parliament,

The European Parliament

| — | having regard to the Commission proposal to the Council (COM(2013)0496), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the Commission proposal to the Council (COM(2013)0496),

| — | having regard to Article 187 and the first paragraph of 188 of the Treaty on European Union, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C7-0257/2013), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Article 187 and the first paragraph of 188 of the Treaty on European Union, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C7-0257/2013),

| — | having regard to Rule 55 of its Rules of Procedure, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Rule 55 of its Rules of Procedure,

| — | having regard to the report of the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy and the opinion of the Committee on Regional Development (A7-0092/2014), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the report of the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy and the opinion of the Committee on Regional Development (A7-0092/2014),

| 1. | Approves the Commission proposal as amended; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Approves the Commission proposal as amended;

| 2. | Calls on the Commission to alter its proposal accordingly, in accordance with Article 293(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Calls on the Commission to alter its proposal accordingly, in accordance with Article 293(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union;

| 3. | Calls on the Council to notify Parliament if it intends to depart from the text approved by Parliament; |
| --- | --- |

3.

Calls on the Council to notify Parliament if it intends to depart from the text approved by Parliament;

| 4. | Asks the Council to consult Parliament again if it intends to substantially amend the Commission proposal; |
| --- | --- |

4.

Asks the Council to consult Parliament again if it intends to substantially amend the Commission proposal;

| 5. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and the Commission. |
| --- | --- |

5.

Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and the Commission.

---

P7_TC1-NLE(2013)0241

Position of the European Parliament adopted on 15 April 2014 with a view to the adoption of Council regulation (EU) No .../2014 establishing the Bio-based Industries Joint Undertaking

(As an agreement was reached between Parliament and Council, Parliament's position corresponds to the final legislative act, Council Regulation (EU) No 560/2014)

---
#### In the Matter of the Department of Parks. In the Matter of Harney.

Reference ordered. Settle order on notice.
EXHIBIT 31.1  --  Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section
                  302 of the Sorbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

                                CERTIFICATION

I, Robert Kamon, Secretary, and Chief Financial Officer certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Australian-Canadian
Oil Royalties Ltd.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this quarterly report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and I have:

   (a)  designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
   material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
   subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
   particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being
   prepared;

   (b)  evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
   and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
   quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

   (c)  presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
   effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
   evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing
equivalent function):

   (a)  all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of  internal
   controls that could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
   process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
   registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

   (b)  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
   employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
   controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal
controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.


Date:  August 10, 2004


/s/ Robert Kamon
-------------------------------
Robert Kamon
Secretary and Chief Financial Officer
# C_2014089EN.01007201.xml

| 28.3.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 89/72 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.3.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 89/72

---

Corrigendum to Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the TFEU — Cases where the Commission raises no objections

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 50 of 21 February 2014
  )

Official Journal of the European Union C 50 of 21 February 2014

2014/C 89/17

On page 21, the text referring to the State Aid No SA.37543 is cancelled and replaced by the following:

‘Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the TFEU

Cases where the Commission raises no objections

(Text with EEA relevance, except for products falling under Annex I of the Treaty)

| Date of adoption of the decision | 17.12.2013 |
| --- | --- |
| Aid number | SA.37543 (2013/N) |
| Member State | France |
| Region | — | — |
| Title (and/or name of the beneficiary) | Aides à la publicité des secteurs des fruits, des légumes, de l''horticulture, des pommes de terre, des productions végétales spécialisées et de l''apiculture |
| Legal basis | — | L. 621-1 du code rural et de la pêche maritime |

Date of adoption of the decision

17.12.2013

Aid number

SA.37543 (2013/N)

Member State

France

Region

—

—

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

Aides à la publicité des secteurs des fruits, des légumes, de l''horticulture, des pommes de terre, des productions végétales spécialisées et de l''apiculture

Legal basis

—

L. 621-1 du code rural et de la pêche maritime

| — | L. 1511-1 et suivants du code général des collectivités territoriales |
| --- | --- |

—

L. 1511-1 et suivants du code général des collectivités territoriales

Type of measure

Scheme

—

Objective

Advertising (AGRI)

Form of aid

Other

Budget

| | Overall budget: EUR 16,5 (in millions) |
| --- | --- |

Overall budget: EUR 16,5 (in millions)

| | Annual budget: EUR 16,5 (in millions) |
| --- | --- |

Annual budget: EUR 16,5 (in millions)

Intensity

100 %

Duration (period)

1.1.2014-31.12.2014

Economic sectors

AGRICULTURE, FORESTRY AND FISHING

Name and address of the granting authority

| Ministère de l'agriculture, de l'agroalimentaire et de la forêt |
| --- |
| 3 rue barbet de jouy 75349 paris 07 |

Ministère de l'agriculture, de l'agroalimentaire et de la forêt

3 rue barbet de jouy 75349 paris 07

Other information

—

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

http://ec.europa.eu/competition/elojade/isef/index.cfm’

---
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jose Jaquez, Appellant.

[823 NYS2d 685]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Cooperman, J.), rendered October 13, 2004, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree (four counts), upon a jury verdict, and sentencing him to four indeterminate terms of one to three years imprisonment under counts one through four of the indictment, all the sentences to run consecutively.

Ordered that the judgment is modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, by directing that the terms of imprisonment imposed on the defendant’s convictions under counts one and two of the indictment run concurrently with each other, the terms of imprisonment imposed on the defendant’s convictions under counts three and four of the indictment run concurrently with each other, and the terms of imprisonment imposed on the defendant’s convictions under counts one and two of the indictment run consecutively with the terms of imprisonment imposed on the defendant’s convictions under counts three and four of the indictment; as so modified, the judgment is affirmed.

The sentence imposed is excessive to the extent indicated herein.

The defendant’s remaining contention does not require reversal. Schmidt, J.P, Santucci, Mastro and Fisher, JJ., concur.
### §8171. Continuation of authority after loss of vessel or aircraft

If the crew of any naval vessel or naval aircraft are separated from their vessel or aircraft because of its wreck, loss, or destruction, all the command and authority given to the officers of the vessel or aircraft remain in full force until the crew are discharged or reassigned.

(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 372, §5951; renumbered §8171, Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, §807(b)(5), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1834.)

| Revised section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 5951 | 34 U.S.C. 264. | May 5, 1950, ch. 169, §7(a), 64 Stat. 145. |

The word "officers" is substituted for the word "officer" since the cited subsection of the Act of May 5, 1950, was intended to reenact the substance of Article 21 of the Articles for the Government of the Navy (R.S. 1624; 34 U.S.C. 1200), in which the word "officers" was used. The words "regularly" and "by competent authority" are omitted as surplusage.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–232 renumbered section 5951 of this title as this section.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2018 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 115–232 effective Feb. 1, 2019, with provision for the coordination of amendments and special rule for certain redesignations, see section 800 of Pub. L. 115–232, set out as a note preceding section 3001 of this title.
#### Edward Rowland and Others, Trustees in Bankruptcy of the Searchmont Automobile Company, Appellants, v. Charles Clifton, as President of the Association of Licensed Automobile Manufacturers, Respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. No opinion.
Exhibit 23.1







Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm




We consent to the use in this Annual Report on Form 40-F of Just Energy Group Inc.[the “Company”] of our reports dated May 14, 2014, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of the Company as at March 31, 2014 and 2013, and for the years ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of the Company as at March 31, 2014, included herein.




We also consent to the incorporation by reference of such reports into the Company’s outstanding registration statements on Form F-3 (No. 333-188184), Form F-10 (No. 333-184289) and Form S-8 (No. 333-183954) that have been filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.






















Toronto, Canada,

/s/ Ernst & Young LLPMay 30, 2014

Chartered AccountantsLicensed Public Accountants
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION

In connection with the
Quarterly Report of Graham Packaging Holdings Company on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Mark S. Burgess, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Graham Packaging Holdings
Company.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       |  |                        
|---------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Date: November 2, 2009
|                       | 
|By:                    |  | /s/ Mark S. Burgess    
|                       |  | Mark S. Burgess        
|                       |  | Chief Executive Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
###### Editorial Note on Part 23

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 23 appear at 79 FR 27190, May 13, 2014.

#### § 23.41 Uniform grant administration provisions, requirements and applicability.

The general and uniform grant administration provisions and requirements specified at 25 CFR part 276 and under this subpart are applicable to all grants awarded to tribal governments and off-reservation Indian organizations under this part, except to the extent inconsistent with an applicable Federal statute, regulation or OMB circular.
§ 101.11 Interest. ( a ) The interest to be charged on loans by the United States shall be at a rate determined by the Secretary of the Treasury in accordance with section 104, title I, of the Indian Financing Act of 1974 (Pub. L. 93-262, 88 Stat. 77). The interest rate shall be determined monthly and shall be effective on advances made on loans during the current calendar month. The interest rate shall be stated in the promissory note(s) executed by the borrower(s) evidencing the advance(s).
( b ) Additional charges to cover loan administration costs, including credit reports, may be charged to borrowers.
( c ) Education loans may provide for deferral of interest while the borrower is in school full time or in the military service.
( d ) The interest rate on loans made by relending organizations which are conducting relending programs shall not be less than the rate the organization pays on its loan(s) from the United States. Relending organizations which adopt and follow the same procedure in calculating interest on educational loans as is followed on educational loans made by the United States, will not be charged interest on loans from the United States on the amount outstanding on educational loans during the period the organization is not charging its borrowers interest.
( e ) Interest rates on loan advances made by the United States as shown on promissory notes dated before April 12, 1974, will remain in effect until the loan is paid in full, refinanced, or modified to extend the repayment terms. Unless otherwise specifically provided in a loan contract, the interest rate on advances made after April 12, 1974, will be at a rate determined pursuant to section 104 of title I of the Indian Financing Act of 1974. The interest rate on loans for expert assistance will be at a rate established in § 101.25 herein.
[40 FR 3587, Jan. 23, 1975. Redesignated at 47 FR 13327, Mar. 30, 1982, as amended at 57 FR 46472, Oct. 8, 1992]
CIty of \\ f r.

~0"ti

. CITY

10 FIRST ST. NW

MASON CITY, IA 50401

(641)421-3600/ FAX (641)423-5369

WWW.MASONCITY.NET

Eric Bookmeyer, Mayor

July 2, 2014

Mr. Kevin Schlemmer

Chief, Essential Air Service Division

U.S. Department of Transportation

Office of the Secretary of Trsncportstion

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE

Washington, D.C. 20590

Sent electronically via e-mail

RE: Request Ordering Resoliciting Essential Air Service Proposals Served April 22, 2014

Docket Number: OST-2001-10684; Mason City

Dear Mr. Schlemmer:

The Mason City Airport Commission met on June 30, 2014 and unanimously voted to accept the

Request for Proposal submitted by Air Choice One to serve the Mason City Municipal Airport for

the next two-year period with 24 round trips per week to Chicago O'Hare International Airport. .

...

While Mason City and Fort Dodge attempted to attract a mainline carrier to serve both our

communities with the present airline environment this effort was not successful at this time.

Iunderstand the US DOT requires that our community receives twin engine service; however, the

Commission is supporting the proposal submitted by Air Choice One with the single engine aircraft

due to the limited choices of the proposals submitted.

We are also aware that the proposal submitted by Air Choice One exceeds the $200 per passenger

cap, however it is our expectations for the community to support their service which will lower the

per passenger cap requirement within the EAS Program at the present time.

We will respectfully await the EAS Department of Transportation's decision regarding our request.

Sincerely, ..»: /

E~e

/

~-~~ ~----

Mayor of Mason City
#### § 226.46 Information collection.

The Office of Management and Budget has determined that the information collection requirements contained in this part need not be submitted for clearance pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 3501 *et seq.*