alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### **CHAPTER 161—PROPERTY RECORDS AND REPORT OF THEFT OR LOSS OF CERTAIN PROPERTY**

Sec.
2721.
Property records: maintenance on quantitative and monetary basis.
2722.
Theft or loss of ammunition, destructive devices, and explosives: report to Secretary of the Treasury.
2723.
Notice to congressional committees of certain security and counterintelligence failures within defense programs.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**1999**—Pub. L. 106–65, div. A, title X, §1042(b), Oct. 5, 1999, 113 Stat. 760, added item 2723.

**1991**—Pub. L. 102–190, div. A, title X, §1061(a)(17)(B), Dec. 5, 1991, 105 Stat. 1473, substituted "Property records: maintenance on quantitative and monetary basis" for "Basis" in item 2721.

**1990**—Pub. L. 101–510, div. A, title XIII, §1331(7), Nov. 5, 1990, 104 Stat. 1673, substituted "Basis" for "Basis: reports" in item 2721.

**1988**—Pub. L. 100–456, div. A, title III, §344(b)(1), Sept. 29, 1988, 102 Stat. 1962, inserted "AND REPORT OF THEFT OR LOSS OF CERTAIN PROPERTY" in chapter heading and added item 2722.

**1986**—Pub. L. 99–499, title II, §211(a)(3), Oct. 17, 1986, 100 Stat. 1725, redesignated item 2701 as item 2721.
### Geology of the Capitol Reef area, Wayne and Garfield Counties, Utah

By: J. Fred Smith Jr.Lyman C. HuffE. Neal HinrichsRobert G. Luedke

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/pp363

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (17760 pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (14.6 MB pdf)                          Geologic map and sections of the Capitol Reef area
  - **Plate 2**                            (1.16 MB pdf)                          Structure contour map and wall sections of the Oyler Mine, Capitol Reef area 
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

The Capitol Reef area includes about 900 square miles in western Wayne and north-central Garfield Counties, Utah. It is along the border between the High Plateaus of Utah and the Canyon Lands sections of the Colorado' Plateaus province. Capitol Reef National Monument is in the eastern part of the mapped area. 

#### Study Area

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001061708
<NAME> MEADOWS PRESERVATION, INC.

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                          67,921
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                67,921
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  80,827
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           55,763
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    (8,194)
<COMMON>                                             5
<OTHER-SE>                                      33,253
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    80,827
<SALES>                                        350,207
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               370,178
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  176,197
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 8,602
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             182,721
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (78,414)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (78,414)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (78,414)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (172)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (172)


</TABLE>
#### § 11.425 Persistent non-support.

A person commits a misdemeanor if he or she persistently fails to provide support which he or she can provide and which he or she knows he or she is legally obliged to provide to a spouse, child or other dependent.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 30 Agreed to House (ATH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 30

 Designating minority membership on certain standing committees of the 
                                 House.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 2, 1999

 Mr. Watts  of Oklahoma submitted the following resolution; which was 
                        considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Designating minority membership on certain standing committees of the 
                                 House.

    Resolved, That the following named Members be, and they are hereby, 
elected to the following standing committees of the House of 
Representatives:
    Committee on Government Reform: Mr. Doolittle and Mrs. Chenoweth.
    Committee on the Judiciary: Mr. Bachus.
    Committee on Science: Mr. Sanford and Mr. Metcalf.
    Committee on Small Business: Mr. Pease, Mr. Thune, and Mrs. Bono.
    Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure: Mr. Bereuter, Mr. 
Kuykendall, and Mr. Simpson.
    Committee on Veterans' Affairs: Mr. Hansen, Mr. McKeon, and Mr. 
Gibbons; all to rank in the named order following Mr. LaHood.
                                 <all>
```
### §7776. Emergency construction: fortifications

If in an emergency the President considers it urgent, a temporary fort or fortification may be built on private land if the owner consents in writing.

(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 270, §4776; Pub. L. 91–393, §5, Sept. 1, 1970, 84 Stat. 835; renumbered §7776, Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, §808(d), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1839.)

| Revised section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 4776 | 50:178. | Apr. 11, 1898, J. Res. 21, 30 Stat. 737. |

The word "important" is omitted as covered by the word "urgent". The words "upon which such work is to be placed" are omitted as surplusage.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–232 renumbered section 4776 of this title as this section.

1970—Pub. L. 91–393 struck out at end "In such a case, section 175 of title 50 does not apply."

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2018 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 115–232 effective Feb. 1, 2019, with provision for the coordination of amendments and special rule for certain redesignations, see section 800 of Pub. L. 115–232, set out as a note preceding section 3001 of this title.
§ 170.456 How can a Tribe request an exception from the design standards? ( a ) A Tribe can request an exception from the required design standards from FHWA. The engineer of record (the State licensed civil engineer whose name and professional stamp appear on the PS&E or who is responsible for the overall project design) must submit written documentation with appropriate supporting data, sketches, details, and justification based on engineering analysis.
( b ) FHWA can approve a project design that does not conform to the minimum criteria only after giving due consideration to all project conditions, such as: ( 1 ) Maximum service and safety benefits for the dollar invested;
( 2 ) Compatibility with adjacent features; and
( 3 ) Probable time before reconstruction of the project due to changed conditions or transportation demands.
( c ) FHWA has 30 days from receiving the request to approve or decline the exception.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# U.S. Soldiers Work with Fijian Forces to Form Peace-keeping Battalion 

By  1st Lt. Sondra Setterington (2nd CR)

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More Articles/News
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT

At a stated Term of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, held at the Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse, 40 Foley Square, in the City of New York, on the 10 thday of June, two thousand fourteen.

PRESENT:

JON O. NEWMAN, JOSÉ A. CABRANES, ROSEMARY S. POOLER, Circuit Judges

.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - THE NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY, CHARLIE SAVAGE, SCOTT SHANE, AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION, AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION, Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v. Docket Nos. 13-422(L), 13-445(Con)

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

ORDER

On June 9, 2014, in connection with the Appellees’ petition for rehearing, filed June 5, 2014, the Court submitted to the Appellees ex parte and in camera a proposed opinion with respect to the rehearing petition and a proposed revised version of the Court’s April 21 public opinion. The proposed opinion on the rehearing petition (1) bifurcated the issues concerning disclosure of the OLC-DOD Memorandum and the petition’s request for relief with respect to the Vaughn index, (2) granted the petition for rehearing to the extent that it requested further deletions from the OLC-DOD Memorandum, (3) advised that a revision of the Court’s April 21 public opinion with a redacted version of the OLC-DOD Memorandum would be filed the same day as the opinion withrespect to the rehearing petition was filed, and (4) deferred decision with respect to the Appellees’ request for relief with respect to the Vaughn index.

On May 28, 2014, the Court issued an order stating, among other things, that the parties would be notified by 5 p.m. Friday, June 6, 2014, whether oral argument on the Government’s petition for rehearing would be scheduled on Monday, June 9, 2014. On June 6, 2014, we further advised (in a corrected order) that the parties will be notified by 5 p.m. Friday, June 13, 2014, whether oral argument on the Government’s petition for rehearing will be scheduled for Monday, June 23, 2014.

We now direct the Appellees to notify the Court by noon on Friday, June 20, 2014, whether it has any objection to the filing of the proposed opinion on the rehearing petition and the proposed revision of the Court’s April 21 public opinion including the redacted OLC-DOD Memorandum. If no objection is received, the Court will file the proposed opinion on the rehearing petition and the proposed revision of the Court’s April 21 public opinion including the redacted OLC-DOD Memorandum on Monday, June 23. If timely objection is received, it must be set forth with specificity, and oral argument on the petition for rehearing will be scheduled at 2 p.m. Monday, June 23, limited to issues concerning filing of the proposed opinion on the rehearing petition and filing of the proposed revision of the Court’s April 21 public opinion with the redacted version of the OLC-DOD Memorandum.

FOR THE COURT: Catherine O’Hagan Wolfe, Clerk
#### § 152.2 Withholding action on application.

Action on any application, which if approved would remove Indian land from restricted or trust status, may be withheld, if the Secretary determines that such removal would adversely affect the best interest of other Indians, or the tribes, until the other Indians or the tribes so affected have had a reasonable opportunity to acquire the land from the applicant. If action on the application is to be withheld, the applicant shall be advised that he has the right to appeal the withholding action pursuant to the provisions of part 2 of this chapter.
**MIDLAND CAPITAL HOLDINGS CORPORATION****EXHIBIT 31.1****CHIEF EXECUTIVE AND FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION**I, Paul Zogas, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Midland Capital Holdings Corporation;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have: a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterlyreport is being prepared; and  b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarterthat has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls overfinancial reporting which could adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls.        DATE: November 10, 2005 BY:  /s/ Paul Zogas     Paul Zogas     President, Chief Executive Officer
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Employers & Practitioners 
-  Mortality, Retirement and PV Max Guarantee 
-  ERISA Section 4044/4050 Mortality Tables 
-  ERISA Section 4050 Mortality Table (Missing Participants)... 

This page has not been translated. Please go to PBGC.gov's Spanish home page for more information available in Spanish.

Esta página no ha sido traducida. Por favor vaya a la página principal del sitio de español de PBGC para ver información disponible en español.

# ERISA Section 4050 Mortality Table (Missing Participants) for 2008 Valuation Dates

This mortality table is used as part of the "missing participant annuity assumptions" as discussed in 29 CFR 4050. This mortality table is also available in EXCEL.

The rate tables applicable for other years are accessible from the main ERISA Section 4044/4050 Mortality Tables page.

November 29, 2018

##           Related Information      

Subscribe to Interest Rate Updates
Exhibit
      32.1





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of QuadTech International, Inc. (the
      "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended July 31, 2006 as filed with
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John
      Meier, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      QuadTech International, Inc. and will be retained by QuadTech International,,
      Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request.





*September
                14, 2006*
              
              */s/
                / John Meier*
              
              *John
                Meier*
              *President
                and Chief Executive Officer*
#### § 242.9 Quotas.

The Secretary may set such commercial quotas as he may find desirable, based on available biological and other information, on the amount of fish which may be taken under authority of the regulations in this part in any one season. Until otherwise determined by the Secretary, not more than 650,000 pounds of walleyes may be taken in any one fishing season.
153 So.2d 250

#### Jesse BELK v. Shirley BELK.

6 Div. 860.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

May 9, 1963.

Guin, Guin & Cleere, Russellville, for appellant.

Bill Fite, Hamilton, for appellee.

LAWSON, Justice.

The bill in this case was filed by appellee against appellant under § 1109, Title 7, Code 1940, to quiet title to certain lands located in Marion County.

The allegations of the bill followed the prescription of the statutes and called on the respondent to avow and declare his title, claim or interest and prayed for a declaration and settlement of the title in complainant.

Trial by jury was demanded by complainant in writing endorsed on the bill. Section 1112, Title 7, Code 1940.

A jury was duly empaneled and after all evidence was adduced, the issues were defined by the trial court in its oral charge. The jury returned the following verdict: “We, the Jury, find the issues in favor of the Complainant, Shirley Belk.”

The circuit court, in equity, entered a final decree in accordance with the verdict of the jury quieting the title to said lands in the appellee, Shirley Belk.

*174From such final decree the respondent, Jesse Belli, has appealed and has by assignments of error challenged the sufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict and the refusal of certain charges.

In the absence of motion made in the equity court prior to the entering of the final decree to set aside the verdict of the jury, the assignments of error are without merit and present nothing for review. Brintle v. Wood, 223 Ala. 472, 136 So. 803; Farmers & Merchants Bank of Ashville v. Jones, 238 Ala. 463, 191 So. 617; Hill v. Cowart, 251 Ala. 260, 37 So.2d 103; Owens v. Washington, 260 Ala. 198, 69 So.2d 694; Wood v. Miller, 263 Ala. 499, 83 So.2d 206; id.,264 Ala. 370, 88 So.2d 560; Woods v. Allison Lumber Co., 261 Ala. 286, 74 So.2d 486; Marshburn v. Sullivan, 270 Ala. 50, 116 So.2d 378.

Affirmed.

LIVINGSTON, C. J., and GOODWYN and COLEMAN, JJ., concur.
**EXHIBIT
      32.1 – CEO Certification**








**SATELLIE
      NEWSPAPERS CORP.**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUNT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Satellite Newspapers Corp. (the
      "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2007 as filed
      with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
      Roy
      Piceni, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors of the
      Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss. 1350, as added by ss. 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.         The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.         The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and
      for
      the period covered by the Report.






/s/
      Roy Piceni


Roy
      Piceni, CEO


And
      Chairman of the Board of Directors





November
      19, 2007





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002 ("Section 906"), or other document authenticating, acknowledging,
      or
      otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the
      electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been
      provided to Satellite Newspapers Corp., and will be retained by Satellite
      Newspapers Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
      its
      staff upon request.