# From: Barnett, Keith

Sent: Friday, August 28, 2015 1:25 PM

To: Frey, Nathan J.; Aaron_L_Szabo@omb.eop.gov

Cc: Nizich, Sharon; Jordan, Scott; VanLare, Paula

Subject: Requested Information on the Brick NESHAP

Hello Aaron –

As we discussed this week, we think all the small kilns will be able to meet the limits (in particular

the lb/hr metals and Hg concentration limits). Thus, any small entity that incurs control costs will do

so because they have a large kiln that can’t meet the large kiln limit(s).

There are 15 small entities with at least one large kiln. Note that where we have no site specific

emission data the potential to become a synthetic area source is based on emission factors we

calculated from facilities where we have emissions data.

We took information from actual companies and then developed a modeled data base since we did

not have enough data to know how much each facility would need to spend on controls. Thus,

most of our projections of which facilities would actually need to install air emissions controls

(particularly for small entities) and all of our cost estimates are based on modeled data. Our

results showed that possibly 6 small companies would need to install controls, but the data we

have doesn’t allow us to determine which specific facilities those are.

Attached are four files:

1. MACT final draft memo

2. Impacts final draft memo

3. Table of promulgated vs final limits, including a comparison of what the final limits would have

looked like if we had retained 12% of the universe of kilns as our basis for the MACT floor.

4. List of modeled plants and their associated costs for controls.

Please let us know when you would like to discuss next week. Thanks.

Keith Barnett

919-541-5605

<< E O 12866_Brick Clay 2060-AP69 MACT memo_DRAFT 8 27.docx >>

<< E O 12866_Brick Clay 2060-AP69 IM PACTS memo_DRAFT 8 27-530pm.docx >>

<< E.O. 12866_Brick & Clay 2060-AP69 Table of Modeled Plant Costs_DRAFT 8 27.xlsx >>

<< E.O. 12866_Brick & Clay 2060-AP69 Table of Proposal and Promulgated Limits _DRAFT 8

27.xlsx >>

# DRAFT

Date: August 26, 2015

To: Sharon Nizich, EPA/OAQPS/SPPD

From: Gabrielle Raymond and Kristin Sroka (RTI International)

Subject: Final Maximum Achiev able Control Technology (MACT) Floor Analysis for

Brick and Structural Clay Products

I. Introduction

In accordance with section 112 of the Clean Air Act (CAA), the U.S. Environmental

Protection Agency (EPA) established national em ission standards for hazardous air pollutants

(NESHAP) on May 16, 2003, for the brick and struct ural clay products (B SCP) manufacturing

industry. The NESHAP regulated emissions of hydrogen fluoride (HF), hydrogen chloride

(HCl), and particulate matter (PM)—a surrogate for hazardous air pollutant (HAP) metals—from

tunnel kilns located at BSCP facilities. On March 13, 2007, the D.C. Circuit Court vacated the

emission standards for BSCP manu facturing due to issues associated with the methodology used

to determine the minimum regulatory “floors” for new and existing units. 1 

# Therefore, on

December 18, 2014, the EPA proposed new standa rds for BSCP manufacturing, including

standards for HF, HCl, chlorine (Cl 2 

# ), mercury (Hg), and non-Hg HAP metals (or PM surrogate).

The EPA provided a 90-day public comment period following proposal of the BSCP

Manufacturing NESHAP, during which all affect ed parties were given the opportunity to

comment on the proposed rule. The EPA has considered the comments received and, as

appropriate, incorporated them into the final rule.

Section 112 of the CAA requires that the EPA establish NESHAP for the control of the

HAP emitted from both new and existing sources in a source category. These standards must

reflect the maximum degree of reduction in the HAP emissions that is achievable. The minimum

level of control is referred to as the “maximum achievable control tec hnology (MACT) floor.”

The method for determining the MACT floor is defined for both new and existing sources by

CAA section 112(d)(3). For new sources, the MA CT floor cannot be less stringent than the

emission control that is achieved in practice by the best controlle d similar source. For existing

sources, the MACT floor cannot be less stringent than the av erage emission limitation achieved

by the best performing 12 percent of existing sources for source categories with 30 or more

sources, or the best performing 5 sources for source categories with fe wer than 30 sources.

1 

# Sierra Club v. EPA , 479 F.3d 875 (D.C. Cir. 2007).

# 2 The purpose of this memorandum is to present the methodology and the results of the

MACT floor analysis for the BSCP source catego ry. This MACT floor analysis uses data

collected in a survey of BSCP owners a nd operators conducted by the EPA in 2008 and 2010

under section 114 of the CAA and data receive d during the public comment period. The

emissions data supplied by BSCP owners and oper ators in response to the survey and the public

comment period were compiled into a Microsoft Excel® data base that serves as the dataset used

for this MACT floor analysis (referred to in this memorandum as the “survey dataset”). For

more details about the survey dataset, see Test Data Used in BSCP Final Rule (Raymond, 2015).

II. Hazardous Air Pollutants

The specific chemicals, compounds, or groups of compounds designated to be HAP are

listed in CAA section 112(b). Included on the list are metals, organi c compounds, and inorganic

chemicals. From this HAP list, the following HAP were identified to be emitted from BSCP

facilities: the acid gases HF, HCl, and Cl 2 

# ; the metals antimony (Sb), arsenic (As), beryllium

(Be), cadmium (Cd), chromium (C r), cobalt (Co), lead (Pb), manga nese (Mn), Hg, nickel (Ni),

and selenium (Se); and dioxins a nd furans (D/F). MACT floor le vels for HAP metals other than

Hg were analyzed using filterable PM emissions as a surrogate for total non-Hg HAP metals

from BSCP facilities (see the preamble to the BSCP proposed ru le for more information about

filterable PM as a surrogate for total non-Hg HAP metals).

MACT floors were not developed for acid gase s or D/F. A health-based emission limit

was developed for acid gases under CAA section 112(d)(4), and work practice standards were

developed for D/F under CAA section 112(h). The rationale behind these standards is discussed

in the preamble to the BSCP final rule.

III. MACT Floor Analysis Subcategories

Under CAA section 112(d)(1), the EPA ha s the discretion to “...distinguish among

classes, types, and sizes of sour ces within a category or subcategor y in establishing...” standards.

When separate subcategories are established, a MACT floor is determined separately for each

subcategory. To determine whether the BSCP source category warrants subcategorization for

the MACT floor analysis, the EPA reviewed BSCP tunnel kiln design, operating information,

and emissions data compiled in the survey datase t and other information collected by the Agency

for development of the NESHAP for this source category (Raymond et. al, 2014). Based on this

review, the EPA concluded that there are signifi cant design and operational differences in BSCP

tunnel kilns that affect the leve ls of emissions of certain HAP to justify subcategorizing BSCP

tunnel kilns for the purpose of establishing MACT floors. For the BSCP source category, the

following two subcategories were identified:

 Large tunnel kilns: New and existing BSCP tunnel kiln s with a design capacity equal to

or greater than 10 tons per hour (tph) of fired product.

 Small tunnel kilns: New and existing BSCP tunnel kiln s with a design capacity less than

10 tph of fired product.

# 3 For the final standards, these subcategories were used for the MACT floors for Hg, PM,

and non-Hg HAP metals.

IV. MACT Floor Analysis Concepts

A. Upper Prediction Limit

The MACT floor analysis for BSCP manufacturing uses an upper prediction limit (UPL)

approach to identify the average emission limita tion achieved by those best performing sources.

The EPA uses a UPL approach in its MACT floo r analyses because it incorporates the average

performance of the best performi ng sources and the variability of the performance during testing

conditions. The UPL represents the value which one can expect the mean of a specified number

of future observations ( e.g. , 3-run average) to fall below for the specified level of confidence,

based upon the results of an independent sample from the same population. The level of

confidence represents the level of protection afforded to facilities whose emissions are in line

with the best performers. For example, a 99 pe rcent level of confidence means that a facility

whose emissions are in line with the best perf ormers has one chance in 100 of exceeding the

floor limit. A prediction interval for a single fu ture observation (or an average of several test

observations) is an interval that will, with a specified degree of confidence, contain the next (or

the average of some other pre-specified number of) randomly selected observation(s) from a

population. In other words, the UPL estimates what the upper bound of future values will be,

based upon present or past background samples ta ken. The UPL approach encompasses all the

data point-to-data point variability. The predic tions derive from the dataset to which it is

applied, and, thus, can be a pplied to any type of data.

There are different equations for calculati ng a UPL based on the distribution of the

dataset. Data can be normally distributed, logno rmally distributed, or neither and thus have a

skewed/unknown distribution. The EPA implemen ted the statistical tests of skewness and

kurtosis to determine the distribution of the best performing sources’ data.

The skewness statistic (S) characterizes the degree of asymmetry of a given data

distribution. Normally distributed data have an S value of zero. An S value that is greater than

zero indicates that the data are asymmetrically distributed with a right tail extending towards

positive values; similarly, an S value that is less than zero indicates that the data are

asymmetrically distributed with a left tail exte nding towards negative values. The value of S can

be approximated using the followi ng equation (which is implemen ted in Microsoft Excel® using

the “SKEW” function):



#    3

1 

# 2 1 

# 

 

#      



   n

i i



# stdev x x

n n n Skewness

where:

n = sample size



# x = mean of MACT floor pool

# 4 x i 

# = individual source mean

stdev = 

#  

  

# 

 

1 2



# n x x i



# As part of determining whether a data distri bution can be considered normal, the S value

must be compared to the standard error of the skewness statistic (SES). The SES value can be

approximated using the following equation:



#    

    3 1 2 1 6

 

  



n n n n n SES



# According to the skewness hypothesis test, if the absolute value of S is less than two

times the absolute value of SES, the skewne ss of the data can be considered normal.

The kurtosis statistic (K) characterizes the degree of p eakedness or flatness of a given

data distribution in comparison to a normal dist ribution. Normally distributed data have a K

value of zero. A K value that is greater than zero indi cates a relatively peak ed distribution. A K

value that is less than zero indicates a relativel y flat distribution. The estimate of K can be

calculated one of two ways. For datasets with more than three run values, kurtosis can be

estimated using the following equation (which is implemented in Microsoft Excel® using the

“KURT” function):



#  

     

   3 2 1 3

3 2 1 1 2 4



#   

     

          



   

 

# 

n n n

stdev x x

n n n n n Kurtosis

This equation cannot be used for datasets with three run values (n=3) because there will

be a zero in the denominator of the first and s econd term. Instead, for datasets with three run

values, kurtosis is estimated using the following equation:



#  

   3

1 4 1 4



# 

 

 

# 





# stdev n x x

Kurtosis n

i i



# As part of determining whether a data distri bution can be considered normal, the K value

must be compared to the standard error of the kurtosis statistic (SEK). The SEK value can be

approximated using the following equation:



#    

     5 3 3 2 1 24 2



# 

 

 



n n n n n n SEK

(for datasets with more than three runs (n>3))

# 5 n SEK 24

 

# (for datasets with three runs (n=3))

According to the kurtosis hypothesi s test, if the absolute value of K is less than two times

the absolute value of SEK, the kurtosis of the data can be considered normal.

For this MACT floor analysis, if the re sults from both the skewness and kurtosis

hypothesis tests indicated the dataset was norma lly distributed, the dataset was treated as

normally distributed in subsequent UPL calculations. If either of these tests indicated the dataset

was not normally distributed, the dataset was lo g-transformed, and the lo g-transformed dataset

was evaluated for kurtosis and skewness. If both tests of the log-transformed data indicated the

log-transformed dataset was normally distribut ed, the dataset was treated as lognormally

distributed in subsequent UPL calcu lations. If either of these te sts indicated the log-transformed

dataset was not normally distributed, the datase t was treated as skewed /unknown distribution in

subsequent UPL calculations.

For datasets with only thr ee run values, the result of both the skewness and kurtosis

hypothesis tests always indicate the dataset is normally distributed. Therefore, to determine the

appropriate data distribution for those datasets, the skewness/SES values from raw data were

compared to the skewness/SES values from l og-transformed data. Th e smaller skewness/SES

value was selected as an indication of a larg er likelihood of the data to come from the

corresponding distribution.

After completing the determination of the type of data distribution fo r each dataset, the

UPL was calculated using the corresponding equation for the distribution for that dataset. The

UPL equations for normal, lognormal, and skew ed/unknown distribution da tasets are provided

below.

Normally Distributed Dataset



#      

  

m n s t x UPL df 

# 1 1

2

99

. 0

,



# where:

UPL = upper prediction limit

x 

# = mean of the data calculated as 

#  

  

#  N

i n

j ij i 

# x

n x

1 1 

# 1



# n = number of test runs = 

# 

 N

i i 

# n

1



# m = number of future test runs in the compliance average

N = number of sources

# 6 s 2 

# = pooled variance calculated as 

#   

# 

 

#   n

i i 

# x x

n s

1 2

2 

# 1



# t df,0.99 

# = quantile of t-distribution at the 99 per cent level of confiden ce with degrees of

freedom (df); this value can be calculate d with the Student’s t-test statistical

method, using the “TINV” function in Microsoft Excel® software

df = degrees of freedom calculated as 

#  

1

1 

#   

# 

 N

i i 

# n df

Lognormally Distributed Dataset (Bhaumik and Gibbons, 2004)



#      

 

 

 

  

     



# 1 2 ˆ ˆ 1 4 2

ˆ ˆ 2 2 ˆ ˆ ˆ 2 99

. 0 2 ˆ

ˆ 2 2 2 2



# n n e m e me

m z

e UPL  

      



# where:

 ˆ 

# =

n y log n

i i 

# 

 1 

# ) ( 

# = the average of the log transformed data from the data

2 

# ˆ  

# = 

#    

1 ˆ

1 2



#   

# 





# n y log n

i i 

#  

# = variance estimate of the log transformed data

Z 0.99 

# = the 99 th 

# -percentile of the log-normal di stribution estimated using the

trapezoidal rule approach from the following equation:



#     

#     99

. 0

24 6 3 3 3

6 1 99

. 0



# 0 4 2

2 3 1



#   

 

 

 



  

  

# 

z z z

z z z

z z 

#   

Skewed/Unknown Distribution (Non-N ormal/Non-Lognormal) (Gayen, 1949)



#      

  

m n s t x UPL

p df 

# 1 1

2

,



# where:

UPL = upper prediction limit

x 

# = mean of the data calculated as 

#  

  

#  N

i n

j ij i 

# x

n x

1 1 

# 1



# n = number of test runs = 

# 

 N

i i 

# n

1



# m = number of future test runs in the compliance average

N = number of sources

# 7 s 2 

# = pooled variance calculated as 

#   

# 

 

#   n

i i 

# x x

n s

1 2

2 

# 1



# t df,p 

# = recalculated quantile of t-distribution based on spec ified level of confidence

( i.e. , 99%)

df = degrees of freedom calculated as 

#  

1

1 

#   

# 

 N

i i 

# n df

B. Representative Detection Limit

The imprecision of test method measurements is another component of data variability.

At very low emissions levels, as encountered in some of the da ta in the BSCP dataset, the

inherent imprecision in the pollutant measuremen t method has a large influence on the reliability

of the data underlying a MACT floor emission limit. Of particular concer n are those data that

are reported near or below a test method’s pollu tant detection capability . Because of matrix

effects, laboratory techniques, sample volum e, and other factors, method detection limits

normally vary from test to test. The guideli nes for the 2010 section 114 BSCP survey requested

that sources identify ( i.e. , flag) data which were measured below the method detection limit and

to report those values as equal to th e test-specific method detection limit.

Variability of data due to measurement imprecision is inhere ntly and reasonably

addressed in calculating a MACT floor emission limit when most of the data are significantly

above the method detection limit. For datasets w ith a large number of test results below the

method detection limit (reported as method detecti on limit values), other techniques need to be

used to account for data variab ility. Indeed, under such a shif t, the data distribution becomes

truncated on the lower end, leading to an arti ficial overabundance of values occurring at the

method detection limit. There is a concern that a MACT floor emission limit based on a

truncated data base ( i.e. , calculated using values at or near the method detection limit) may not

account adequately for data measurement variabi lity, because the measurement error associated

with those values provides a large degree of uncertainty.

The expected measurement imprecision for an emissions value occurring at or near the

detection limit is about 40 to 50 percent. Relati ve pollutant measuremen t imprecision decreases

to a consistent 10 to 15 percent for values m easured at a level about three times the method

detection limit (ASME, 2001).

The approach taken to account for measurem ent variability include s defining a detection

limit that is representative of the data used in establishing a MACT floor emission limitation and

also minimizes the influence of an outlier test -specific method detection limit value. The EPA

has developed a list of representative detecti on levels (RDL) from ava ilable pollutant-specific

method detection levels (Westlin and Merrill, 20 11). These RDL values are then multiplied by

three to decrease measurement imprecision to aro und 10 to 15 percent (as noted in the previous

paragraph), resulting in values referred to as “3xRDL” values.

The appropriate 3xRDL value is compared to the calculated UPL value for each pollutant

and subcategory. The larger of the 3xRDL value and the calculated UPL value is used for the

# 8 MACT floor emission limit to ensure that measurem ent variability is adequately addressed. This

check was part of the variability an alysis for all existing MACT floors.

For more information regarding the general us e of the UPL and why it is appropriate for

calculating MACT floors, see the memorandum Use of the Upper Prediction Limit for

Calculating MACT Floors (Telander, 2014a).

C. Mercury Raw Material Variability Factor

The Brick Industry Association (BIA) coordinate d with several BSCP facilities to test the

Hg content of the raw materials used and provide d the data to the EPA. The EPA mapped the

facilities and quarry locations pr ovided by BIA to identify two di stinct quarry locations, an OK

deposit and an OH deposit, for use in the development of a Hg raw material variability factor.

The BIA provided the Hg content (ppb) fo r samples from several different BSCP

facilities. See Appendix E for data pr ovided by the BIA. As discussed in Mercury Content of

Oklahoma and Ohio Shale Deposit s Supplying the Brick Industry (Fairchild, 2015), the EPA

used the raw material data from two deposits, Oklahoma and Ohio.

For each deposit, a facility average of the raw material data was first calculated, then the

deposit average was calculated by av eraging the facility averages. Next, the standard deviation

of the facility averages was calculated. Th en the relative standard deviation (RSD) was

calculated for each deposit by dividing the deposit average by the deposit standard deviation for

each deposit. The overall RSD is the average of the Oklahoma and Ohio RSDs. Please see

Appendix E for the calculation of the overall RSD.

The overall RSD, or Hg Raw Material RSD, was then used to calculate the Hg Raw

Material Variability factor, which was incorporated into each UPL template (Normal,

Lognormal, and Skewed/Unknown) as described below.

1. Calculate Intra Quarry Variance (IQV)



#   2



# x RSD IQV  

Where:

RSD = Relative standard deviation



# x = mean of the raw data

2. Incorporate IQV into pooled variance to adjust the variance of the floor pool

Normal and Skewed/Unknown UPL Template

Adjusted Variance = IQV s 

2

# 9 Lognormal UPL Template

Adjusted Variance = 

#     IQV

n n e m e me   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

  



# 1 2 ˆ ˆ 1 4 2

ˆ ˆ 2 2 ˆ ˆ ˆ 2 2 2 2 

#  

    



# 3. Incorporate Adjusted Variance into UPL equation

Normal UPL Template



#        

   

m n IQV s t x UPL df 

# 1 1

2

99

. 0

,



# Skewed/Unknown UPL Template



#        

   

m n IQV s t x UPL

p df 

# 1 1

2

,



# Lognormal UPL Template



#     IQV

n n e m e me

m z

e UPL   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

     



# 1 2 ˆ ˆ 1 4 2

ˆ ˆ 2 2 ˆ ˆ ˆ 2 99

. 0 2 ˆ

ˆ 2 2 2 2



#  

      



# Please see the Appendix B Microsoft Excel® f iles for the specific UPL calculation and

how the Hg raw material variability factor was incorporated for Large and Small Tunnel Kiln Hg

floors (lb/ton, lb/hr, and μg/dscm @ 17% O 2 

# ).

V. MACT Floor Analysis Methodology

Step 1.

The first step in the MACT floor analysis wa s to calculate an average emission value for

each source per pollutant and per unit of measure ba sed on the available test data. Averages were

calculated in terms of lb/ton a nd concentration for PM and Hg, as well as lb/hr for non-Hg HAP

metals and Hg.

# 10 For any run fractions per test run marked as “< method de tection limit (or other reporting

limit)” the fraction was considered BDL. 2 

# For this analysis, the method detection limit for that

fraction was used as the mass to calculate a run value ( i.e. , lb/ton, μg/dscm, and lb/hr). For PM

runs, if the mass was below the 1 milligram (mg) RDL value, 1 mg was used as the mass to

calculate a run value (Raymond, 2014).

Step 2.

Once an average emission value was calculate d for each source, in each subcategory and

pollutant, all of the individual average emission valu es were ranked from lowest to highest value.

See Appendix A for the rankings for each pollutant and subcategory.

Step 3.

From the rankings shown in Appendix A, the best performing sources were identified

consistent with the criteria in CAA section 112 (d)(3) for determining MACT floors for new and

existing sources. These sources are referred to as the “MACT floor pool.” For the new source

MACT floors, the best controlled similar sour ce was identified from the sources that had

individual source test run data in the survey dataset. For th e existing source MACT floors, the

number of sources in the MACT floor pool was determined on an individual subcategory basis,

as described in Table 1.

Table 1. Number of Sources in Existing Source MACT Floor Pool a



# Pollutant Subcategory No. Sources

Nationwide No. Sources with

Data No. Sources in

MACT Floor Pool

PM Large Kilns 122 68 9

PM Small Kilns 98 18 3

Non-Hg HAP Metals Large Kilns 122 14 2

Non-Hg HAP Metals Small Kilns 98 2 1

Hg Large Kilns 122 19 3

Hg Small Kilns 98 2 1

a Each MACT floor pool is based on 12 percent of the sources with data.



# Step 4.

Each MACT floor dataset (for each subcateg ory and pollutant) was evaluated for kurtosis

and skewness to determine the distribution, as described in Section IV .A of this memorandum.

Step 5.

After determining the type of data distribut ion for the dataset, the UPL was calculated

using the corresponding equation fo r the distribution for that data set, as described in Section

2 

# For the EPA Method 29 multi-metals test, each metal lab an alysis typically has two separate fractions: front-half

(filter) and back-half (impinger catch); mercury can have three additional back-half fractions.

# 11 IV.A of this memorandum. See Appendix B fo r UPL summary tables for new and existing

sources.

Step 6.

The results of the UPL calculation were comp ared to the 3xRDL value of the relevant

performance test method(s) (Westlin and Merrill, 2011). As described in Section IV, this step

ensures that data measuremen t variability is addressed.

The 3xRDL values in the guidance document (Westlin and Merrill, 2011) were given in

units of concentration (micrograms per dry standard cubic meter [μg/dscm] with no oxygen

correction). The PM emission limits for the fi nal BSCP NESHAP are in units of pound per ton

(lb/ton) of brick and grains per dry standard cubic foot at 17 percent oxygen (gr/dscf @ 17% O 2 

# ).

The final non-Hg HAP metals emission limit is in units of pounds per hour (lb/hr). The final Hg

emission limits are in units of lb/ton of br ick, micrograms per dry standard cubic meter at

17 percent oxygen (μg/dscm @ 7% O 2 

# ), and lb/hr. In order to co mpare the calculated UPL to the

3xRDL, the 3xRDL value was converted to the units of the emission limits using a ratio of the

emission data in the units of interest ( e.g. , lb/ton brick) to the em ission data in μg/dscm

(uncorrected). See Appendix C for more details about the conversion of the 3xRDL values to the

units of measure used in UPL calculations.

The converted 3xRDL value was then compared to the calculated UPL in the same units

of measure. If the calculated UPL value was le ss than the 3xRDL value, the 3xRDL value was

used as the basis for the standard because th e 3xRDL value provides the lowest emission rate

that can be measured using the performance test method while maintaining a relative method

precision on the order of 10 to 20 percent of the measured value. If the UPL value was equal to

or greater than the 3xRDL value, then the UPL value was used as the basis for the standard.

Step 7.

For limited datasets with less than seven data points, the steps outlined in the

memorandum Approach for Applying the Upper Prediction Limit to Limited Datasets (Nizich,

2015) were followed. See Appendix D for more details about limited datasets.

VI. MACT Floor Analysis Results

Tables 2 and 3 present the existing so urce and new source MACT floor values

determined for the BSCP source category.

# 12 Table 2. Final Existing Source MACT Floors

Subcategory Pollutant Avg. Var. 99%

UPL 3xRDL MACT

Floor

Rounded Unit of Measure

Large Kilns PM 0.014 8.5E-0 5 0.035 0.016 0.036 lb/ton

Equivalent PM 0.0011 7.8E-07 0. 0029 0.0012 0.0029 gr/dscf @ 17% O 2



# Small Kilns PM 0.063 0.00 57 0.36 0.016 0.37 lb/ton

Equivalent PM 8.5E-04 1.4E-07 0.0021 0.0010 0.0021 gr/dscf @ 17% O 2



# Large Kilns Non-Hg HAP Metals 0.00 13 1.2E-07 0.0022 0.0057 0.0057 lb/hr

Small Kilns Non-Hg HAP Metals 0.057 2.5E-04 0.10 0.0031 0.11 lb/hr

Large Kilns Mercury 1.6E-05 9.7E-12 4.0E-05 8.0E-06 4.0E-05 lb/ton

Equivalent Mercury 3.0 0.65 7.5 1.5 7.6 μg/dscm @ 17%

O 2



# Equivalent Mercury 1.7E-04 1.2E-09 5.3E-04 8.0E-05 5.4E-04 lb/hr

Small Kilns Mercury 1.8E-04 5.5E-11 3.2E-04 1.7E-05 3.3E-04 lb/ton

Equivalent Mercury 17 0.17 88 1.7 88 μg/dscm @ 17%

O 2



# Equivalent Mercury 0.0010 1.8E-09 0.0018 2.0E-04 0.0019 lb/hr



# Table 3. Final New Source MACT Floors

Subcategory Pollutant Avg. Var. 99%

UPL 3xRDL MACT

Floor

Rounded Unit of Measure

Large Kilns PM 0.0087 1. 1E-05 0.018 0.016 0.018 lb/ton

Equivalent PM 6.1E-04 7. 8E-08 0.0014 0.0012 0.0014 gr/dscf @ 17% O 2



# Small Kilns PM 0.0093 3.0E-0 5 0.029 0.016 0.030 lb/ton

Equivalent PM 6.5E-04 1. 4E-07 0.0020 0.0010 0.0021 gr/dscf @ 17% O 2



# Large Kilns Non-Hg HAP Metals 0.0012 7.1E-08 0.0027 0.0057 0.0057 lb/hr

Small Kilns Non-Hg HAP Metals 0.057 2.5E-04 0.10 0.0031 0.11 lb/hr

Large Kilns Mercury 1.5E-05 8.8E-13 2.7E-05 8.0E-06 2.8E-05 lb/ton

Equivalent Mercury 2.5 0.68 6.1 1.5 6.1 μg/dscm @ 17%

O 2



# Equivalent Mercury 1.4E-04 2.0E-09 3.3E-04 8.0E-05 3.4E-04 lb/hr

Small Kilns Mercury 1.8E-04 5.5E-11 3.2E-04 1.7E-05 3.3E-04 lb/ton

Equivalent Mercury 17 0.17 88 1.7 88 μg/dscm @ 17%

O 2



# Equivalent Mercury 0.0010 1.8E-09 0.0018 2.0E-04 0.0019 lb/hr



# VII. References

ASME (founded as the American Societ y of Mechanical Engineers). 2001. Reference Method

Accuracy and Precision (ReMAP): Phase 1, Precision of Manual Stack Emission

Measurements . CRTD Vol. 60, February 2001.

# 13 Bhaumik, D.K. and Gibbons, R.D. 2004. “An Uppe r Prediction Limit for the Arithmetic Mean

of a Lognormal Random Variable.” Technometrics , 46(2):239-248.

Fairchild, S. 2015. Mercury Content of Oklahoma and Ohio Shale Deposits Supplying the Brick

Industry . Memorandum from Susan Fairchild, EP A/OAQPS/SPPD, to Docket ID No. EPAHQ-OAR-2013-0291. July 29, 2015.

Gayen, A. K. 1949. “The Distribution of Stude nt’s t in Random Samples of any Size Drawn

from Non-Normal Universes.” Biometrika , Vol. 36, No. 3/4 (Dec. 1949), pp. 353-369.

Nizich, S. 2015. Approach for Applying the Upper Pred iction Limit to Limited Datasets

. Memorandum from Sharon Nizi ch, EPA/OAQPS/SPPD, to Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR2013-0291. XXX XX, 2015.

Raymond, G. 2015. Test Data Used in BSCP Final Rule . Memorandum from Gabrielle

Raymond, RTI International, to Sharon Nizich, EPA/OAQPS/SP PD. XXX XX, 2015.

Raymond, G., Sroka, K., and Munoz, B. 2014. Analysis of Potential Subc ategories in the BSCP

Tunnel Kilns . Memorandum from RTI International, to Jeff Telander, EPA/OAQPS/SPPD.

November 6, 2014.

Telander, J. 2014a. Use of the Upper Prediction Lim it for Calculating MACT Floors

. Memorandum from Jeff Telander, EPA/OAQ PS/SPPD, to Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR2013-0291. September 9, 2014.

Westlin, P. and Merrill, R. 2011. Data and procedure for handling below detection level data in

analyzing various pollutant emissions databases for MACT and RTR emissions limits

. Memorandum from Peter Westlin, SPPD/MPG and Raymond Merrill, AQAD/MTG, to

SPPD management and MACT rule writers. December 13, 2011.

# Appendix A

MACT Floor Ranking Tables

# A-1 MACT Floor Ranking Tables

For each source per pollutant and subcategory, an average emission value was calculated.

The average emission values for each source per po llutant and subcategory were than ranked by the

average emission values to determine the best performing sources. The corresponding Appendix A

Microsoft Excel® files provide the calculations for each source average emission value per

pollutant and subcategory. They also provide the rankings of the average emission values per

pollutant and subcategory. The following tables ar e summary excerpts of the rankings from those

Microsoft Excel® files. The MACT floor pool in each table includes those kilns listed above the

bolded line.A-2Table A-1. Final Standards for Large Kilns – PM lb/ton RankingA-3Kiln IDAPCD TypeSizeClassAverage PM(lb/ton)VarianceBelow 1mg ValuenRank byAverage514 DIFFLarge Area Source (synthetic) 0.00757 7.68E-06 2 1538 DIFFLarge Major Source 0.00868 1.09E-05 yes 5 2508 DIFFLarge Major Source 0.01003 1.71E-05 5 3695 NoneLarge Major Source 0.01278 1.26E-06 2 4503 DIFFLarge Area Source (synthetic) 0.01399 3.67E-07 3 5568 DIFFLarge Area Source (synthetic) 0.01709 5.99E-05 2 6696 DLALarge Major Source 0.01761 1.38E-04 3 7600 DIFFLarge Area Source (synthetic) 0.01799 2.98E-04 yes 6 8604 DLSLarge Area Source (synthetic) 0.01843 3.98E-05 3 9688 DIFFLarge Area Source (synthetic) 0.02899 1.41E-04 5 10603 DLSLarge Area Source (synthetic) 0.03278 2.23E-04 3 11558 DIFFLarge Major Source 0.03471 1.05E-03 yes 6 12610 DIFFLarge Area Source (synthetic) 0.03602 7.97E-05 5 13673 DLALarge Major Source 0.03627 1.23E-04 6 14674 DLALarge Major Source 0.03627 1.23E-04 6 15662 DLALarge Major Source 0.03784 6.66E-04 3 16543 DIFFLarge Area Source (synthetic) 0.03790 1.10E-03 yes 5 17606 DIFFLarge Major Source 0.03901 1.80E-03 yes 3 18502 DLSLarge Major Source 0.04255 1.48E-03 yes 6 19544 DIFFLarge Area Source (synthetic) 0.04487 1.09E-03 yes 14 20654 DIFFLarge Area Source (synthetic) 0.04500 3.28E-05 3 21583 DLALarge Major Source 0.04765 3.08E-04 3 22680 DLALarge Major Source 0.04959 6.83E-05 3 23653 DIFFLarge Major Source 0.05149 4.00E-05 5 24566 DIFFLarge Major Source 0.06024 3.28E-03 yes 8 25506 DLSLarge Area Source (synthetic) 0.06262 4.10E-04 5 26770 DLALarge Major Source 0.06884 1.92E-04 3 27526 DIFFLarge Major Source 0.06969 1.05E-03 9 28547 DIFFLarge Major Source 0.07636 5.17E-04 3 29548 DIFFLarge Major Source 0.07636 5.17E-04 3 30A-4Kiln IDAPCD TypeSizeClassAverage PM(lb/ton)VarianceBelow 1mg ValuenRank byAverage527 DIFFLarge Major Source 0.07699 6.23E-03 yes 9 31725 DLALarge Area Source (synthetic) 0.07840 1.93E-03 3 32691 DLALarge Area Source (synthetic) 0.08227 4.29E-04 3 33769 DLALarge Major Source 0.08635 4.66E-04 3 34625 DLALarge Major Source 0.09099 5.79E-04 3 35567 DIFFLarge Major Source 0.09304 5.67E-04 3 36721 WSLarge Area Source (synthetic) 0.09565 1.82E-03 5 37724 DLALarge Area Source (synthetic) 0.09599 7.78E-04 3 38641 DLALarge Area Source (synthetic) 0.09977 1.64E-03 3 39518 DLALarge Major Source 0.10624 5.28E-04 3 40679 DLALarge Major Source 0.10847 3.80E-03 3 41738 DIFFLarge Area Source (synthetic) 0.11217 8.58E-03 6 42573 DLA, FCALarge Area Source (synthetic) 0.13228 2.02E-04 3 43730 DLALarge Major Source 0.13851 2.63E-03 6 44577 DLALarge Major Source 0.14145 3.56E-02 13 45578 DLALarge Major Source 0.14145 3.56E-02 13 46649 DLALarge Major Source 0.14213 9.04E-03 6 47646 DLALarge Area Source (synthetic) 0.14327 1.01E-02 6 48675 DIFFLarge Area Source (synthetic) 0.14825 1.72E-03 3 49740 DLALarge Area Source (synthetic) 0.15802 2.68E-03 3 50729 DLALarge Major Source 0.17786 1.91E-03 3 51644 DLALarge Major Source 0.17806 9.79E-04 3 52676 DIFFLarge Area Source (synthetic) 0.18995 3.55E-02 6 53736 DLALarge Area source (synthetic) 0.20060 7.15E-03 3 54647 DLALarge Area Source (synthetic) 0.23418 3.68E-02 7 55655 DIFFLarge Area Source (synthetic) 0.23971 5.23E-02 5 56645 DLALarge Major Source 0.26210 6.74E-03 6 57539 NoneLarge Major Source 0.28166 5.73E-03 2 58720 WSLarge Area Source (synthetic) 0.32413 1.33E-01 5 59768 DLALarge Major Source 0.37699 1.40E-02 3 60A-5Kiln IDAPCD TypeSizeClassAverage PM(lb/ton)VarianceBelow 1mg ValuenRank byAverage643 WSLarge Area Source (synthetic) 0.37757 5.25E-02 7 61612 DLALarge Major Source 0.41284 1.27E-02 3 62613 DLALarge Major Source 0.41284 1.27E-02 3 63551 DLALarge Major Source 0.57684 5.15E-02 16 64552 DLALarge Major Source 0.57684 5.15E-02 16 65775 NoneLarge Major Source 0.64068 4.38E-02 6 66766 DLALarge Major Source 0.82067 7.89E-01 6 67767 DLALarge Major Source 0.82067 7.89E-01 6 68A-6Table A-2. Final Standards for Large Kilns – PM gr/dscf @ 17% O2RankingA-7Kiln IDAPCD TypeSizeClassAverage PM(gr/dscf @17% O2)VarianceBelow 1mg ValuenRank byAverage508 DIFF Large Major Source 0.000614 7.83E-08 5 1695 None Large Major Source 0.000648 4.18E-08 2 2514 DIFF Large Area Source (synthetic) 0.000697 7.72E-08 2 3503 DIFF Large Area Source (synthetic) 0.000767 9.80E-09 3 4568 DIFF Large Area Source (synthetic) 0.001337 3.04E-07 2 5600 DIFF Large Area Source (synthetic) 0.001558 2.25E-06 yes 6 6604 DLS Large Area Source (synthetic) 0.001728 2.37E-07 3 7543 DIFF Large Area Source (synthetic) 0.001882 1.99E-06 yes 5 8662 DLA Large Major Source 0.002669 4.05E-06 3 9603 DLS Large Area Source (synthetic) 0.002695 1.16E-06 3 10544 DIFF Large Area Source (synthetic) 0.002717 4.55E-06 yes 14 11654 DIFF Large Area Source (synthetic) 0.002767 4.40E-08 3 12606 DIFF Large Major Source 0.002868 9.96E-06 yes 3 13566 DIFF Large Major Source 0.003060 7.11E-06 yes 8 14502 DLS Large Major Source 0.003358 9.86E-06 yes 6 15688 DIFF Large Area Source (synthetic) 0.003431 2.17E-06 5 16769 DLA Large Major Source 0.003624 2.20E-07 3 17653 DIFF Large Major Source 0.003729 1.18E-06 5 18610 DIFF Large Area Source (synthetic) 0.003753 2.53E-06 5 19527 DIFF Large Major Source 0.003902 1.29E-05 yes 9 20526 DIFF Large Major Source 0.004072 4.72E-06 9 21538 DIFF Large Major Source 0.004107 1.33E-05 yes 5 22680 DLA Large Major Source 0.004332 3.07E-07 3 23547 DIFF Large Major Source 0.004486 1.69E-06 3 24548 DIFF Large Major Source 0.004486 1.69E-06 3 25506 DLS Large Area Source (synthetic) 0.004710 1.64E-06 5 26721 WS Large Area Source (synthetic) 0.004760 3.68E-06 5 27567 DIFF Large Major Source 0.005333 2.00E-06 3 28558 DIFF Large Major Source 0.005418 2.49E-05 yes 6 29641 DLA Large Area Source (synthetic) 0.005652 5.11E-06 3 30A-8Kiln IDAPCD TypeSizeClassAverage PM(gr/dscf @17% O2)VarianceBelow 1mg ValuenRank byAverage518 DLA Large Major Source 0.006929 2.17E-06 3 31770 DLA Large Major Source 0.007347 4.92E-06 3 32725 DLA Large Area Source (synthetic) 0.007843 2.07E-05 3 33724 DLA Large Area Source (synthetic) 0.008930 1.77E-05 3 34675 DIFF Large Area Source (synthetic) 0.010095 3.12E-05 3 35646 DLA Large Area Source (synthetic) 0.010943 5.19E-05 6 36649 DLA Large Major Source 0.011338 5.89E-05 6 37720 WS Large Area Source (synthetic) 0.011467 1.28E-04 5 38730 DLA Large Major Source 0.012457 2.12E-05 6 39740 DLA Large Area Source (synthetic) 0.012769 2.11E-05 3 40679 DLA Large Major Source 0.013785 4.40E-05 3 41644 DLA Large Major Source 0.014006 6.72E-06 3 42655 DIFF Large Area Source (synthetic) 0.015596 2.35E-04 5 43577 DLA Large Major Source 0.016035 5.14E-04 13 44578 DLA Large Major Source 0.016035 5.14E-04 13 45729 DLA Large Major Source 0.016105 1.28E-05 3 46647 DLA Large Area Source (synthetic) 0.017307 1.94E-04 7 47676 DIFF Large Area Source (synthetic) 0.018290 3.63E-04 6 48645 DLA Large Major Source 0.025039 9.03E-05 6 49551 DLA Large Major Source 0.026017 9.22E-05 16 50552 DLA Large Major Source 0.026017 9.22E-05 16 51539 None Large Major Source 0.026224 4.43E-05 2 52768 DLA Large Major Source 0.028201 8.93E-05 3 53612 DLA Large Major Source 0.032152 1.05E-04 3 54613 DLA Large Major Source 0.032152 1.05E-04 3 55643 WS Large Area Source (synthetic) 0.038993 8.70E-04 7 56775 None Large Major Source 0.042195 6.60E-05 6 57A-9Table A-3. Final Standards for Small Kilns – PM lb/ton RankingKiln IDAPCD TypeSizeClassAverage PM(lb/ton)VarianceBelow 1mg ValuenRank byAverage599 DIFF Small Major Source 0.00930 2.99E-05 3 1549 None Small Major Source 0.01960 1.36E-05 3 2531 SD/ESP Small Major Source 0.11149 6.80E-03 6 3532 SD/ESP Small Major Source 0.11149 6.80E-03 6 4533 SD/ESP Small Major Source 0.18153 1.96E-03 3 5180 None Small Major Source 0.18290 1.06E-03 3 6521 None Small Major Source 0.23121 1.31E-03 3 7178 None Small Major Source 0.24311 5.22E-03 3 8650 None Small Major Source 0.25022 4.06E-03 3 9516 None Small Major Source 0.29156 7.25E-03 6 10179 None Small Major Source 0.31288 1.06E-04 3 11669 None Small Major Source 0.37566 2.73E-04 3 12529 None Small Major Source 0.38192 1.95E-02 3 13530 None Small Major Source 0.39455 1.49E-02 9 14535 None Small Major Source 0.66397 1.98E-02 3 15706 None Small Major Source 0.74622 2.61E-01 6 16704 None Small Major Source 1.18767 6.79E-02 3 17705 None Small Major Source 1.18767 6.79E-02 3 18A-10Table A-4. Final Standards for Small Kilns – PM gr/dscf @ 17% O2RankingKiln IDAPCD TypeSizeClassAverage PM(gr/dscf @ 17%O2)VarianceBelow 1mg ValuenRank byAverage599 DIFF Small Major Source 0.000647 1.43E-07 3 1549 None Small Major Source 0.001046 7.72E-08 3 2531 SD/ESP Small Major Source 0.006673 3.07E-05 6 3532 SD/ESP Small Major Source 0.006673 3.07E-05 6 4180 None Small Major Source 0.009619 3.02E-06 3 5530 None Small Major Source 0.010404 1.21E-05 9 6178 None Small Major Source 0.011154 1.61E-05 3 7533 SD/ESP Small Major Source 0.011596 3.31E-06 3 8521 None Small Major Source 0.012629 3.03E-06 3 9529 None Small Major Source 0.012911 1.29E-05 3 10179 None Small Major Source 0.014582 3.62E-07 3 11516 None Small Major Source 0.023365 4.50E-05 6 12535 None Small Major Source 0.024064 1.72E-05 3 13650 None Small Major Source 0.025025 7.14E-05 3 14A-11Table A-5. Final Standards for Large Kilns – Non-Hg Metal HAP lb/hr RankingKiln IDAPCDTypeSizeClassAverage TotalNon-Hg Metals(lb/hr)VarianceOverall StatusnRank526 DIFF Large Major Source 1.15E-03 7.10E-08 DLL 3 1653 DIFF Large Major Source 1.48E-03 2.04E-07 DLL 2 2600 DIFF Large Area Source (synthetic) 1.69E-03 5.79E-08 DLL 3 3558 DIFF Large Major Source 1.79E-03 2.33E-06 DLL 3 4544 DIFF Large Area Source (synthetic) 1.93E-03 5.98E-08 DLL 3 5543 DIFF Large Area Source (synthetic) 2.14E-03 1.60E-08 DLL 2 6508 DIFF Large Major Source 2.71E-03 1.76E-06 DLL 3 7606 DIFF Large Major Source 3.35E-03 8.32E-10 DLL 2 8527 DIFF Large Major Source 3.72E-03 4.65E-07 DLL 3 9676 DIFF Large Area Source (synthetic) 4.33E-03 1.09E-08 DLL 2 10566 DIFF Large Major Source 4.42E-03 4.27E-06 DLL 2 11655 DIFF Large Area Source (synthetic) 4.91E-03 1.41E-07 DLL 3 12720 WS Large Area Source (synthetic) 9.91E-03 4.87E-07 DLL 2 13721 WS Large Area Source (synthetic) 2.89E-02 7.88E-04 DLL 2 14Table A-6. Final Standards for Small Kilns – Non-Hg Metal HAP lb/hr RankingKiln IDAPCDTypeSizeClassAverage TotalNon-Hg Metals(lb/hr)VarianceOverall StatusnRank531 SD/ESP Small Major Source 2.84E-02 6.15E-05 DLL 3 1532 SD/ESP Small Major Source 2.84E-02 6.15E-05 DLL 3 2A-12Table A-7. Final Standards for Large Kilns – Hg lb/ton RankingaKiln IDAPCDTypeSizeClassAverage Hg(lb/ton)VarianceOverallStatusnRank byAverage568 DIFF Large Area Source (synthetic) 1.48E-05 8.83E-13 BDL 3 1558 DIFF Large Major Source 1.70E-05 1.43E-12 DLL 3 2655 DIFF Large Area Source (synthetic) 1.72E-05 3.10E-11 ADL 3 3547 DIFF Large Major Source 2.31E-05 2.33E-11 DLL 3 4548 DIFF Large Major Source 2.31E-05 2.33E-11 DLL 3 5676 DIFF Large Area Source (synthetic) 2.70E-05 8.99E-12 DLL 3 6503 DIFF Large Area Source (synthetic) 2.91E-05 7.63E-12 DLL 3 7566 DIFF Large Major Source 3.27E-05 2.37E-12 BDL 3 8606 DIFF Large Major Source 3.85E-05 3.30E-11 DLL 3 9721 WS Large Area Source (synthetic) 3.93E-05 4.84E-10 DLL 2 10720 WS Large Area Source (synthetic) 6.22E-05 2.92E-10 DLL 2 11543 DIFF Large Area Source (synthetic) 7.66E-05 7.09E-12 DLL 3 12775 None Large Major Source 7.79E-05 1.60E-09 DLL 3 13526 DIFF Large Major Source 8.50E-05 7.47E-10 ADL 3 14600 DIFF Large Area Source (synthetic) 8.94E-05 1.08E-10 ADL 3 15508 DIFF Large Major Source 9.08E-05 1.21E-10 DLL 3 16527 DIFF Large Major Source 9.08E-05 5.98E-11 ADL 3 17544 DIFF Large Area Source (synthetic) 9.78E-05 1.02E-10 DLL 3 18653 DIFF Large Major Source 1.02E-04 9.35E-12 DLL 3 19aADL = above detection level; WS = wet scrubber; NA = not applicable.A-13Table A-8. Final Standards for Large Kilns – Hg μg/dscm @ 17% O2RankingaKiln IDAPCDTypeSizeClassAverage Hg(μg/dscm @17% O2)VarianceOverallStatusnRank byAverage655 DIFF Large Area Source (synthetic) 2.51 6.81E-01 ADL 3 1568 DIFF Large Area Source (synthetic) 2.93 8.86E-02 BDL 3 2547 DIFF Large Major Source 3.67 7.83E-01 DLL 3 3548 DIFF Large Major Source 3.67 7.83E-01 DLL 3 4503 DIFF Large Area Source (synthetic) 3.71 7.82E-02 DLL 3 5566 DIFF Large Major Source 4.53 7.43E-02 BDL 3 6721 WS Large Area Source (synthetic) 4.54 7.95E+00 DLL 2 7720 WS Large Area Source (synthetic) 4.68 1.49E+00 DLL 2 8676 DIFF Large Area Source (synthetic) 6.17 5.94E-01 DLL 3 9606 DIFF Large Major Source 6.22 2.01E+00 DLL 3 10558 DIFF Large Major Source 6.73 5.28E-01 DLL 3 11526 DIFF Large Major Source 9.36 1.26E+01 ADL 3 12527 DIFF Large Major Source 9.81 6.20E-01 ADL 3 13543 DIFF Large Area Source (synthetic) 12.25 2.90E-02 DLL 3 14508 DIFF Large Major Source 13.40 3.12E+00 DLL 3 15775 None Large Major Source 13.81 4.96E+01 DLL 3 16544 DIFF Large Area Source (synthetic) 14.44 5.67E+00 DLL 3 17653 DIFF Large Major Source 14.48 2.28E-02 DLL 3 18600 DIFF Large Area Source (synthetic) 16.84 5.77E-01 ADL 3 19aADL = above detection level; WS = wet scrubber; NA = not applicable.A-14Table A-9. Final Standards for Large Kilns – Hg lb/hr RankingaKiln IDAPCDTypeSizeClassAverage Hg(lb/hr)VarianceOverallStatusnRank byAverage655 DIFF Large Area Source (synthetic) 1.37E-04 1.97E-09 ADL 3 1568 DIFF Large Area Source (synthetic) 1.75E-04 1.25E-10 BDL 3 2558 DIFF Large Major Source 1.94E-04 1.86E-10 DLL 3 3676 DIFF Large Area Source (synthetic) 2.08E-04 5.33E-10 DLL 3 4503 DIFF Large Area Source (synthetic) 2.77E-04 6.93E-10 DLL 3 5547 DIFF Large Major Source 2.83E-04 1.21E-08 DLL 3 6548 DIFF Large Major Source 2.83E-04 1.21E-08 DLL 3 7720 WS Large Area Source (synthetic) 4.03E-04 1.22E-08 DLL 2 8526 DIFF Large Major Source 4.41E-04 2.01E-08 ADL 3 9721 WS Large Area Source (synthetic) 5.74E-04 1.03E-07 DLL 2 10775 None Large Major Source 6.20E-04 1.01E-07 DLL 3 11527 DIFF Large Major Source 6.41E-04 2.98E-09 ADL 3 12606 DIFF Large Major Source 6.48E-04 9.32E-09 DLL 3 13544 DIFF Large Area Source (synthetic) 6.60E-04 4.63E-09 DLL 3 14566 DIFF Large Major Source 6.62E-04 9.71E-10 BDL 3 15653 DIFF Large Major Source 6.78E-04 4.16E-10 DLL 3 16600 DIFF Large Area Source (synthetic) 1.07E-03 1.55E-08 ADL 3 17543 DIFF Large Area Source (synthetic) 1.12E-03 1.52E-09 DLL 3 18508 DIFF Large Major Source 1.33E-03 2.59E-08 DLL 3 19aADL = above detection level; WS = wet scrubber; NA = not applicable.A-15Table A-10. Final Standards for Small Kilns – Hg lb/ton RankingaKiln NoAPCDTypeSizeClassAverage(lb/ton)VarianceOverallStatusnRank byAverage531 SD/ESP Small Major Source 1.76E-04 5.51E-11 DLL 3 1532 SD/ESP Small Major Source 1.76E-04 5.51E-11 DLL 3 2aSD/ESP = spray dryer/electrostatic precipitator.Table A-11. Final Standards for Small Kilns – Hg μg/dscm @ 17% O2RankingaKiln IDAPCDTypeSizeClassAverage Hg(μg/dscm @ 17%O2)VarianceOverallStatusnRank byAverage531 SD/ESP Small Major Source 17.36 1.71E-01 DLL 3 1532 SD/ESP Small Major Source 17.36 1.71E-01 DLL 3 2aSD/ESP = spray dryer/electrostatic precipitator.Table A-12. Final Standards for Small Kilns – Hg lb/hr RankingaKiln IDAPCDTypeSizeClassAverage Hg (lb/hr)VarianceOverallStatusnRank byAverage531 SD/ESP Small Major Source 9.97E-04 7.05E-09 DLL 3 1532 SD/ESP Small Major Source 9.97E-04 7.05E-09 DLL 3 2aSD/ESP = spray dryer/electrostatic precipitator.

# Appendix B

UPL Tables

# B-1 UPL Tables

Once the best performing sources were iden tified per pollutant and subcategory, the

existing and new source UPL values were calcu lated. The corresponding Appendix B Microsoft

Excel® files provide the calculations for each existing and new source UPL per pollutant and

subcategory. They also provide a summary of the UPL values per pollutant and subcategory.

The following tables are summary excerpts of the UPL values from those Microsoft Excel®

files.B-2Table B-1. Final Standards Existing Source UPL SummarySubcategoryPollutantNo. of SourcesIndustrywideNo. ofSourceswith DataDeterminationof No. ofSources inMACT FloorNo. ofSourcesin MACTFloor (N)No. DataPoints inMACTFloor (n)Averageof TopSourcesVarianceof TopSourcesUPLUnit ofMeasureDataDistributionLarge Kilns PM 122 6812% Sourceswith Data9 31 0.014 8.5E-05 0.035 lb/tonlognormalEquivalent PM 122 5712% Sourceswith Data7 23 0.0011 7.8E-07 0.0029gr/dscf @17% O2lognormalSmall Kilns PM 98 1812% Sourceswith Data3 12 0.063 0.0057 0.36 lb/tonlognormalEquivalent PM 98 1412% Sourceswith Data2 6 8.5E-04 1.4E-07 0.0021gr/dscf @17% O2lognormalLarge KilnsNon-Hg HAPMetals122 1412% Sourceswith Data2 5 0.0013 1.2E-07 0.0022 lb/hr normalSmall KilnsNon-Hg HAPMetals98 212% Sourceswith Data1 3 0.057 2.5E-04 0.10 lb/hr lognormalLarge KilnsMercury1221912% Sourceswith Data391.6E-059.7E-124.0E-05lb/tonnormalEquivalentMercury1221912% Sourceswith Data393.00.657.5μg/dscm @17% O2normalEquivalentMercury1221912% Sourceswith Data391.7E-041.2E-095.3E-04lb/hrskewed/unknownSmall KilnsMercury98212% Sourceswith Data131.8E-045.5E-113.2E-04lb/tonlognormalEquivalentMercury98212% Sourceswith Data13170.1788μg/dscm @17% O2normalEquivalentMercury98212% Sourceswith Data130.00101.8E-090.0018lb/hrlognormalB-3Table B-2. Final Standards New Source UPL SummarySubcategoryPollutantNo. of SourcesIndustrywideNo. ofSourceswith DataDeterminationof No. ofSources inMACT FloorNo. ofSourcesin MACTFloor (N)No. DataPoints inMACTFloor (n)Averageof TopSourcesVarianceof TopSourcesUPLUnit ofMeasureDataDistributionLarge Kilns PM 122 6812% Sourceswith Data1 5 0.0087 1.1E-05 0.018 lb/ton normalEquivalent PM 122 5712% Sourceswith Data1 5 6.1E-04 7.8E-08 0.0014gr/dscf @17% O2normalSmall Kilns PM 98 1812% Sourceswith Data1 3 0.0093 3.0E-05 0.029 lb/ton lognormalEquivalent PM 98 1412% Sourceswith Data1 3 6.5E-04 1.4E-07 0.0020gr/dscf @17% O2lognormalLarge KilnsNon-Hg HAPMetals122 1412% Sourceswith Data1 3 0.0012 7.1E-08 0.0027 lb/hr normalSmall KilnsNon-Hg HAPMetals98 212% Sourceswith Data1 3 0.057 2.5E-04 0.10 lb/hr lognormalLarge KilnsMercury1221912% Sourceswith Data131.5E-058.8E-132.7E-05lb/tonlognormalEquivalentMercury1221912% Sourceswith Data132.50.686.1μg/dscm @17% O2lognormalEquivalentMercury1221912% Sourceswith Data131.4E-042.0E-093.3E-04lb/hrlognormalSmall KilnsMercury98212% Sourceswith Data131.8E-045.5E-113.2E-04lb/tonlognormalEquivalentMercury98212% Sourceswith Data13170.1788μg/dscm @17% O2normalEquivalentMercury98212% Sourceswith Data130.00101.8E-090.0018lb/hrlognormal

# Appendix C

Conversion of 3xRDL Values to Units Other Th an Concentration to Facilitate Comparison

with UPL Values

# C-1 Conversion of 3xRDL Values to Units Other Th an Concentration to Facilitate Comparison

with UPL Values

The standard 3xRDL values developed for sp ecific pollutants at certain sample volumes

are presented in a guidance document develo ped by the EPA (Westlin and Merrill, 2011).

For the BSCP MACT floors, th e units of measure used to develop the UPL values were

lb/ton brick, lb/hr, gr/dscf @ 17% O 2 

# , and μg/dscm @ 17% O 2 

# . However, the 3xRDL values

from the guidance document are given in units of concentration, specifically μg/dscm for metals

and PM. In order to compare the calculated UPL with the 3xRDL for a pa rticular pollutant, we

needed to convert the 3xRDL valu e to the units of measure used in the UPL calculation. This

appendix describes the procedur e used for that conversion.

The Appendix C Microsoft Excel® file provi des the run-by-run test data and the

calculations used to convert the 3xRDL values fo r each pollutant and subcategory. The tables in

this appendix are summary excerpts of the in formation from that Microsoft Excel® file.

1. For all of the sources in th e MACT floor pool, we looked at each test run that was

flagged by respondents to the BSCP survey as below detection leve l (BDL), detection

level limited (DLL), or above detection level (ADL). We proceeded with the following

steps to convert the 3xRDL value to th e units of measure used in UPL.

2. For all of the sources in the PM and Hg MACT existing source floor pools, we compiled

the available concentration, oxygen-corrected concentration, lb/ton, a nd lb/hr values for

those sources and noted the sample volume (d scm) for all runs used in the dataset.

3. We calculated the ratio of the run-by-run data for PM lb/ton / μg/dscm; PM gr/dscf @

17% O 2 

# / μg/dscm; Non-Hg Metal HAP lb/hr / μg/dscm; Hg lb/ton / μg/dscm; Hg

μg/dscm @ 17% O 2 

# / μg/dscm; and Hg lb/hr / μg/dscm.

4. We calculated the average of all the ratio values. Table C-1 pr ovides the calculated

average of all of the ratio values for each pollutant and subcategory.

# C-2 Table C-1. Average of All the Run-by-Run Ratios

Subcategory Pollutant Average

Ratio Units Of Measure

Large Kilns PM 

# 5.26E-06 lb/ton / μg/dscm

PM (equivalent) 

# 3.99E-07 gr/dscf @ 17% O 2 

# / μg/dscm

Small Kilns PM 

# 5.30E-06 lb/ton / μg/dscm

PM (equivalent) 

# 3.22E-07 gr/dscf @ 17% O 2 

# / μg/dscm

Large Kilns Hg 

# 4.70E-06 lb/ton / μg/dscm

Hg (equivalent) 

# 9.07E-01 μg/dscm @ 17% O 2 

# / μg/dscm

Hg (equivalent) 

# 4.72E-05 lb/hr / μg/dscm

Small Kilns Hg 

# 1.02E-05 lb/ton / μg/dscm

Hg (equivalent) 

# 1.01E+00 μg/dscm @ 17% O 2 

# / μg/dscm

Hg (equivalent) 

# 1.16E-04 lb/hr / μg/dscm



# 5. We identified the typical sample volume (in units of dscm) for each dataset. For PM,

Non-Hg HAP Metals, and Hg, th e typical sample volume was equal to 1 dscm for most

BSCP tests.

6. We identified the appropriate 3xRDL concentr ation values for the typical sample volume

of the test runs in this dataset (1 dscm) to use from the memorandum Data and procedure

for handling below detection level data in analyzing various pollutant emissions

databases for MACT and RTR emissions limits (Westlin and Merrill, 2011). Table C-2

displays the appropriate 3xRDL concentra tion values for PM, Hg, and Total Non-Hg

Metals at the typical samp le volume of 1 dscm and other various dscm tests.

Table C-2. 3xRDL Values from Guidance Document (Westlin and Merrill, 2011)

Pollutant RDL (μg) 3xRDL

(μg) 3xRDL Concentrations (μg/dscm)

1 dscm

test 2 dscm

test 3 dscm

test 4 dscm

test

PM filterable

(Method 5) 1.0E+03 3.0E+03 3.0E+03 1.5E+03 1.0E+03 7.5E+02

Mercury (Method

29) analyzed by

Cold Vapor AA 5.6E-01 1.7E+00 1.7E+00 8.4E-01 5.6E-01 4.2E-01

Total Non-Hg

Metals (Method 29)

analyzed by

ICP/AES or AA 8.6E+01 2.6E+02 2.6E+02 1.3E+02 8.6E+01 6.3E+01

Total Non-Hg

Metals (Method 29)

analyzed by ICP/MS

or GFAA 9.0E+00 2.7E+01 2.7E+01 1.4E+01 9.0E+00 6.8E+00C-37.We multiplied the appropriate 3xRDL concentration value for the typical sample volume by the average ratio in Table C-1 toconvert the 3xRDL value into the units ofmeasure used in the UPL calculation (e.g., lb/ton; lb/hr; gr/dscf @17%O2; orμg/dscm @17%O2). Table C-3 displays a summary of the converted 3xRDL values.Table C-3. Converted 3xRDL ValuesSubcategoryPollutantAverageRatioAverage Ratio Units OfMeasure3xRDL atTypicalSampleVolume(μg/dscm)Converted3xRDLValueConverted 3xRDLValue Units OfMeasureLarge Kilns PM 5.26E-06 lb/ton / μg/dscm 3.0E+03 0.016 lb/tonPM (equivalent) 3.99E-07 gr/dscf @ 17% O2/ μg/dscm 3.0E+03 0.0012 gr/dscf @ 17% O2Small Kilns PM 5.30E-06 lb/ton / μg/dscm 3.0E+03 0.016 lb/tonPM (equivalent) 3.22E-07 gr/dscf @ 17% O2/ μg/dscm 3.0E+03 0.0010 gr/dscf @ 17% O2Large Kilns Hg 4.70E-06 lb/ton /μg/dscm 1.7E+00 8.0E-06 lb/tonHg (equivalent)9.07E-01μg/dscm @ 17% O2/ μg/dscm 1.7E+001.5μg/dscm @ 17%O2Hg (equivalent) 4.72E-05 lb/hr / μg/dscm 1.7E+00 8.0E-05 lb/hrSmall Kilns Hg 1.02E-05 lb/ton / μg/dscm 1.7E+00 1.7E-05 lb/tonHg (equivalent)1.01E+00μg/dscm @ 17% O2/ μg/dscm 1.7E+001.7μg/dscm @ 17%O2Hg (equivalent) 1.16E-04 lb/hr / μg/dscm 1.7E+00 2.0E-04 lb/hr8.For Non-Hg HAP Metals there are two setsof 3xRDL values provided by the guidance document per analytical methods forMethod 29: Inductively Coupled AtomicEmission Spectroscopy or Atomic Absorption Analysis (ICP/AES or AA) andInductively Coupled Plasma/Mass Spectrometry or Graphite Furnace Atomic Absorption Analysis (ICP/MS or GFAA). Wemultiplied the appropriate 3xRDL concentration value specific to the analytical method used by each run by run ratio. We thentook the average of those valuesfor the converted 3xRDL value.C-4SubcategoryPollutantRun by Run RatioUnits Of Measure3xRDL at Typical SampleVolume (μg/dscm)Converted3xRDL ValueConverted 3xRDLValue Units OfMeasureLarge Kilns Non-Hg HAP Metals lb/hr / μg/dscm2.6E+02[ICP/AES or AA]and2.7E+01[ICP/MS or GFAA]0.0057 lb/hrSmall Kilns Non-Hg HAP Metals lb/hr / μg/dscm2.6E+02[ICP/AES or AA]and2.7E+01[ICP/MS or GFAA]0.0031 lb/hr9.We compared the 3xRDL value to the calculated UPL.a.If the 3xRDL value was less than or equal to the calculated UPL value, we used the UPL value as the MACT flooremission limit.b.If the 3xRDL value was greater than the calculated UPL value, we used the3xRDL value as the MACT floor emissionlimit.c.Table C-4 and C-5 summarize the results of the calculated UPL and 3xRDL comparison for existing and new sourcefloors.C-5Table C-4. Existing Source FloorsSubcategoryPollutantConverted3xRDL ValueUPLRoundedFloorFloor BasedOnUnits Of MeasureLarge Kilns PM 0.016 0.035 0.036 UPL lb/tonPM (equivalent) 0.0012 0.0029 0.0029 UPL gr/dscf @ 17% O2Small Kilns PM 0.016 0.36 0.37 UPL lb/tonPM (equivalent) 0.0010 0.0021 0.0021 UPL gr/dscf @ 17% O2Large KilnsNon-Hg HAPMetals0.0057 0.0022 0.0057 3xRDL lb/hrSmall KilnsNon-Hg HAPMetals0.0031 0.10 0.11 UPL lb/hrLarge Kilns Hg 8.0E-06 4.0E-05 4.0E-05 UPL lb/tonHg (equivalent) 1.5 7.5 7.6 UPL μg/dscm @ 17% O2Hg (equivalent) 8.0E-05 5.3E-04 5.4E-04 UPL lb/hrSmall Kilns Hg 1.7E-05 3.2E-04 3.3E-04 UPL lb/tonHg (equivalent) 1.7 88 88 UPL μg/dscm @ 17% O2Hg (equivalent) 2.0E-04 0.0018 0.0019 UPL lb/hrC-6Table C-5. New Source FloorsSubcategoryPollutantConverted3xRDL ValueUPLRoundedFloorFloor BasedOnUnits Of MeasureLarge Kilns PM 0.016 0.018 0.018 UPL lb/tonPM (equivalent) 0.0012 0.0014 0.0014 UPL gr/dscf @ 17% O2Small Kilns PM 0.016 0.029 0.030 UPL lb/tonPM (equivalent) 0.0010 0.0020 0.0021 UPL gr/dscf @ 17% O2Large KilnsNon-Hg HAPMetals0.0057 0.0027 0.0057 3xRDL lb/hrSmall KilnsNon-Hg HAPMetals0.0031 0.10 0.11 UPL lb/hrLarge Kilns Hg 8.0E-06 2.7E-05 2.8E-05 UPL lb/tonHg (equivalent) 1.5 6.1 6.1 UPL μg/dscm @ 17% O2Hg (equivalent) 8.0E-05 3.3E-04 3.4E-04 UPL lb/hrSmall Kilns Hg 1.7E-05 3.2E-04 3.3E-04 UPL lb/tonHg (equivalent) 1.7 88 88 UPL μg/dscm @ 17% O2Hg (equivalent) 2.0E-04 0.0018 0.0019 UPL lb/hr

# Appendix D

Limited Datasets

# D-1 For the BSCP source category, we have limited datasets for the following pollutants and

subcategories: Hg for existing and new small tunn el kilns; Non-Hg HAP Metals for existing and

new large and small tunnel kilns; PM for existi ng small tunnel kilns (equi valent only); PM for

new large and small tunnel kilns; and Hg for new large tunnel kilns. We evaluated these specific

datasets to determine whether it is appropriate to make any modifications to the approach used to

calculate MACT floors for each of these datasets.

For each dataset, we performed the following st eps: ensuring that we selected the data

distribution that best represents each datase t; ensuring that the correct equation for the

distribution was then applied to the data; a nd comparing individual components of each limited

dataset to determine if the standards based on limited datasets r easonably represent the

performance of the units included in the dataset (Nizich, 2015).

We did determine that further evaluation of the approach used to calculate MACT floors

for the following floors was needed:

 Small Kilns Existing Equivale nt PM (gr/dscf @ 17% O 2 

# )

 Large Kilns New Hg (lb/ton)

 Large Kilns New Equivalent Hg (μg/dscm @ 17% O 2 

# )

 Large Kilns New Hg (lb/hr)

See Approach for Applying the Upper Prediction Limit to Limited Datasets (Nizich,

2015) for more information. We reevaluated the UPL methodology and as such, the MACT

floors are:

 Small Kilns Existing Equivale nt PM = 0.0021 gr/dscf @ 17% O 2



#  Large Kilns New Hg = 2.7E-05 lb/ton

 Large Kilns New Equivalent Hg = 6.1 μg/dscm @ 17% O 2



#  Large Kilns New Hg = 3.3E-04 lb/hr

The Appendix D Microsoft Excel® file pr ovides additional information about the

reevaluation of BSCP limited datasets.

# Appendix E

Development of Hg Raw Mat erial Variability Factor

# E-1 Development of Hg Raw Mat erial Variability Factor

The corresponding Appendix E Microsoft Excel ® files provide the Hg raw material

provided by BIA and the determination of the overall RSD used in calculations for each existing

and new source UPL per pollutant and subcategory.

See the “Mercury Content of Oklahoma a nd Ohio Shale Deposits Supplying the Brick

Industry” memo (Fairchild 2015) for the determ ination of the two deposits (OK and OH) being

used out of all data provided by the BIA.

# Date: August 27, 2015

To: Sharon Nizich, EPA/OAQPS/SPPD

From: Kristin Sroka, RTI International

Subject: Development of Cost and Emissi on Reduction Impacts for the Final BSCP

Manufacturing NESHAP

I. Introduction

In accordance with section 112 of the Clean Air Act (CAA), the U.S. Environmental

Protection Agency (EPA) established national em ission standards for hazardous air pollutants

(NESHAP) on May 16, 2003, for the brick and struct ural clay products (B SCP) manufacturing

industry. The NESHAP regulated emissions of hydrogen fluoride (HF), hydrogen chloride

(HCl), and particulate matter (PM)—a surrogate for hazardous air pollutant (HAP) metals—from

tunnel kilns located at BSCP facilities. On March 13, 2007, the D.C. Circuit Court vacated the

emission standards for BSCP manu facturing due to issues associated with the methodology used

to determine the minimum regulatory “floors” for new and existing units. 1 

# Therefore, on

December 18, 2014, the EPA proposed new standa rds for BSCP manufacturing, including

standards for HF, HCl, chlorine (Cl 2 

# ), mercury (Hg), and non-Hg HAP metals (or PM surrogate).

The EPA provided a 90-day public comment period following proposal of the BSCP

Manufacturing NESHAP, during which all affect ed parties were given the opportunity to

comment on the proposed rule. The EPA has considered the comments received and, as

appropriate, incorporated them into the final rule.

The final standards include health-based standards for acid gases (HF, HCl, and Cl 2 

# ) and

maximum achievable control t echnology (MACT) numeric emission limits for Hg and non-Hg

HAP metals (or PM surrogate). In developing the standards, the EPA also considered “beyondthe-floor” options for Hg and non-Hg HAP metals (or PM surrogate). The development of these

standards and options are documented in two memoranda, Risk Assessment to Determine a

Health-Based Emission Limitation for Acid Gase s for the Brick and Stru ctural Clay Products

Manufacturing Source Category (Morris et al, 2014) and Final Maximum Achievable Control

Technology (MACT) Floor Analysis for Brick and Structural Clay Products (Raymond and

Sroka, 2015). The purpose of this memorandum is to present the methodology for estimating the

costs, emission reductions, and secondary impacts associated with these st andards/options for the

BSCP Manufacturing source category. A background discussion of the types of costs, emission

1 

# Sierra Club v. EPA , 479 F.3d 875 (D.C. Cir. 2007).

# 2 reductions, and secondary impacts being estimated is provided in the memorandum Methodology

and Assumptions Used to Estimate the Model Co sts and Impacts of BSCP Air Pollution Control

Devices for the Final Rule (Holloway, 2015a).

Section II of this memorandum shows the na tionwide baseline emissions for the BSCP

industry. Section III describes the development of the cost estimate s for facilities that elect to

reduce emissions and become reclassified as synt hetic area sources rather than major sources.

Section IV describes the assessment of what air pollution control devices (APCD) will be needed

for major source facilities to meet the health-based standards. Section V describes the analysis

of what APCD will be needed for tunnel kiln st acks to meet the MACT standards and presents

the nationwide costs, emission reductions, and sec ondary impacts associated with meeting all the

standards.

II. Baseline Emissions

Uncontrolled emission factors, model kiln production rates, and model kiln operating

hours were developed as described in the memorandum Methodology and Assumptions Used to

Estimate the Model Costs and Impacts of BSCP Ai r Pollution Control Devi ces for the Final Rule

(Holloway, 2015a). The memorandum also docum ents control efficiencies and emissions

reductions for new/retrofit APCD installations. The efficiencies and emissions for existing

(baseline) APCD, including dry sorbent injection followed by a fabric filter (DIFF), dry lime

scrubber and fabric filter (DLS/FF), dry limestone adsorber (DLA), and spray dryer/electrostatic

precipitator (SD/ESP), were based on all the available te st data (see the memorandum Test Data

Used in BSCP Final Rule (Raymond, 2015)). Table 1 shows the control efficiencies of baseline

DIFF, DLS/FF, and DLA for HF, HCl, Cl 2 

# , PM, and sulfur dioxide (SO 2 

# ). Table 2 shows the

annual baseline emission estimates in tons per year (tpy) for small and large APCD.

Table 1. Control Efficiencies for Baseline APCD

APCD Type Efficiency

HF HCl Cl 2 

# PM a 

# SO 2



# DIFF 98% 82% 88% 72% 48%

DLS/FF 98% 82% 88% 72% 48%

DLA 95% 30% 42% 20% 12%

a 

# Control efficiencies for non-Hg HAP metals and PM wi th particles less than 2.5 micrometers in diameter (PM 2.5 

# ) are

estimated to be the same as the efficiency for PM.

# 3 Table 2. Annual Baseline Emissions for Each APCD

APCD

Type Size Emissions per APCD (tpy) a



# HF HCl Cl 2 

# Non-Hg

HAP

Metals PM PM 2.5 

# SO 2



# None Small 18.5 2.48 0.106 0.125 11.3 5.45 99.0

DIFF Small 0.371 0.446 0.0127 0.035 3.18 1.53 51.5

DLS/FF Small 0.371 0.446 0.0127 0.035 3.18 1.53 51.5

DLA Small 0.927 1.74 0.0615 0.0999 9.08 4.36 87.1

SD/ESP Small 21.1 5.13 0.652 0.0109 0.993 0.477 51.5

None Large 39.7 5.31 0.227 0.267 24.3 11.7 212

DIFF Large 0.794 0.956 0.0273 0.0749 6.81 3.27 110

DLS/FF Large 0.794 0.956 0.0273 0.0749 6.81 3.27 110

DLA Large 1.99 3.72 0.132 0.214 19.5 9.34 187

SD/ESP Large 42.1 10.3 1.30 0.0218 1.99 0.953 110

a 

# There are no existing controls for mercury (Hg), so eac h small kiln stack is estimated to emit a baseline of

0.00192 tpy of Hg and each large kiln stack is es timated to emit a baseline of 0.00411 tpy of Hg.



# The inventory of BSCP kilns a nd facilities, including the APCD for each kiln stack, is

presented in the memorandum Updated BSCP Inventory Database and Documentation for Brick

and Structural Clay Products Manufacturing Final Rule (Holloway, 2015b). To develop the

nationwide baseline emission estimates, each ki ln stack in this inve ntory was assigned the

appropriate baseline emissions fr om Table 2 based on the size a nd type of APCD on the stack.

Table 3 summarizes the number of BSCP kiln st acks with each type of APCD and the total

nationwide baseline emissions.

# 4 Table 3. Nationwide Baseline Emissions Estimates for BSCP Tunnel Kilns

APCD

Type Size Count Emissions (tpy)

HF HCl Cl 2 

# NonHg

HAP

Metals Hg PM PM 2.5 

# SO 2



# None Small 71 1,320 176 7.53 8.86 0.136 806 387 7,030

DIFF Small 1 0.371 0.446 0.0127 0.035 0.00192 3.18 1.53 51.5

DLS/FF Small 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

DLA Small 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

SD/ESP Small 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

None Large 35 1,390 186 7.95 9.36 0.144 851 409 7,430

DIFF Large 14 11.1 13.4 0.382 1.05 0.0575 95.3 45.8 1,540

DLS/FF Large 1 0.794 0.956 0.0273 0.0749 0.00411 6.81 3.27 110

DLA Large 24 47.7 89.2 3.16 5.14 0.0985 467 224 4,480

SD/ESP Large 1 42.1 10.3 1.3 0.0218 0.00411 1.99 0.953 110



# Total 147 2,810 476 20.4 24.5 0.446 2,230 1,070 20,800



# III. Estimate of Cost to Facilities to Become Synthetic Area Sources

Given the large number of small entities in th e BSCP industry, it is an ticipated that some

owners and operators will explor e the possibility of reducing emissions below the thresholds

defining a major source of HAP emissions (potential to emit [P TE] 10 tpy of a single HAP or

25 tpy of all HAP combined) and be coming reclassified as a synthe tic area source so that their

sources will not be subject to the BSCP Manuf acturing NESHAP. If an owner or operator

estimates that the cost to become a synthetic ar ea source is less than the compliance costs for the

BSCP Manufacturing NESHAP, it is expected that the owner or operator will elect to become a

synthetic area source. The methodology behind this analysis is describe d in this section;

Appendix A shows the detailed calculations for each BSCP tunnel kiln and facility.

To compare the cost to become a synthe tic area source to the BSCP Manufacturing

NESHAP compliance costs, the cost for each f acility to become a synthetic area source was

estimated based on the facility’s current emissi on estimates and whether installation of a DLA

would reduce the acid gas emissions below ma jor source thresholds. Design capacities are

available for each tunnel kiln at each major s ource facility in the BSCP industry (Holloway,

2015b), and test data are availa ble for some of those kiln s (Raymond, 2015). The design

capacities, site-specific test data (where available; emission fact ors were used if test data were

not available), and model contro l device parameters were used to estimate potential emissions

from each kiln before and after control.

For simplicity, the analysis was limited to HF, HCl, and Cl 2 

# , since those are the

predominant HAP emitted from BSCP kilns by mass. If HF, HCl, and/or Cl 2 

# test data were

available for a kiln, the emission factor calculate d from the test in units of pounds of emissions

per ton of bricks (lb/ton) was used to estimat e potential emissions. If not, the average lb/ton

# 5 emission factor for the existing control device (c alculated based on the available BSCP test data

for those pollutants) was used.

A code was assigned to each kiln indicati ng the source of the data. Since the Cl 2 

# data set

was limited, the main focus was the source of HF and HCl data. If both HF and HCl emissions

were based on test data, the code of “2” was assigned; if the em issions for one pollutant were

based on test data but the emissions for the ot her were based on the average emission factor, a

code of “1” was assigned, and if no test data we re available for that kiln, a code of “0” was

assigned. The HF, HCl, and Cl 2 

# emissions for each kiln were th en calculated in tpy based on the

kiln design capacity, assuming 8,760 hours of ope ration per year (in order to estimate the

maximum PTE), and then summed per kiln and then per facility.

The current status (i.e., ma jor or synthetic area source) was estimated based on the

following assumptions:

 If both HF and HCl test data we re available for all kilns at the facility (code of 2) and

the total facility estimated PTE was less than 90 percent of each of the major source

thresholds, the facility was considered synthetic area.

 If a mix of test data and emission factors were used for the facility (code of 1) and the

total facility estimated PTE was less than 75 percent of each of the major source

thresholds, the facility was considered synthetic area.

 If no test data for any kilns at the facility were available (code of 0) and the total

facility estimated PTE was less than 60 percent of each of the major source

thresholds, the facility was considered synthetic area.

It should be noted that to the EPA’s knowledge, all of the facilities in the analysis are

currently classified as major sources. The source s estimated to be synthetic area sources in this

analysis are facilities w ith emissions data suggesting that they could apply for synthetic area

status with their permitting author ity without needing to add APCD or reduce the kiln production

rates. Based on the analysis, 16 of the 85 curr ent major sources have low enough PTE that they

could become synthetic area sources with minimal cost ( i.e. , conducting emissions testing to

confirm their emissions and submitting paperwork to their permitting authority for a formal

change in classification). The estimated costs for these facilities to become synthetic area sources

are shown in Appendix A and Section V of this memorandum, but costs to meet the HBEL and

the non-Hg HAP metals and Hg limits are not estimated.

The next step was to assign an action to be taken and estimate “controlled” emissions. If

the kiln was already controlled, or if the facility was already cons idered a potential synthetic area

source based on current emissions, the assigned action was “None”; othe rwise it was “Install

DLA.” (For the purposes of this analysis, it was assumed that the cost to retrofit currentlycontrolled tunnel kilns woul d not be less than the cost to co mply with the BSCP Manufacturing

NESHAP.) A few uncontrolled kilns were manua lly adjusted to “None” for facilities with

multiple kilns that could become synthetic area sources without controlling all kilns. See

Appendix A for these designations.

Controlled emissions for kilns with an ac tion of “Install DLA” were estimated as a

reduction from the individual k iln PTE for HF, HCl, and Cl 2 

# based on the DLA control

# 6 efficiencies presented in Table 1. If the action was “None,” cont rolled emissions were estimated

to be equivalent to the PTE (a s calculated above). The “controlle d” emissions for each kiln at

each facility were then summed.

The next step was to determine what the major/area source status would be after DLA

were installed (where possible), based on the following assumptions:

 If no DLA would be installed, both HF and HC l test data were available for all kilns

at the facility, and the total facility estimated PTE was less than 90 percent of the

major source thresholds, the facility was c onsidered synthetic area without additional

control.

 If no DLA would be installed, a mix of test data and emission factors were used for

the facility, and the total facility estimated PTE was less than 75 percent of the major

source thresholds, the facil ity was considered syntheti c area without additional

control.

 If no DLA would be installed, no test data we re available for any kilns at the facility,

and the total facility estimated PTE was less than 60 percent of the major source

thresholds, the facility was considered synthetic area without additional control.

 If at least one DLA would be installed, both HF and HCl test data were available for

all kilns at the facility, and the total facil ity estimated PTE was less than 80 percent of

the major source thresholds, the facility wa s considered synthetic area after control.

 If at least one DLA would be installed, a mi x of test data and emission factors were

used for the facility, and the total facility estimated PTE was less than 65 percent of

the major source thresholds, the facility wa s considered synthetic area after control.

 If at least one DLA would be installed, no test data were available for any kilns at the

facility, and the total facility estimated PTE was less than 50 percent of the major

source thresholds, the facil ity was considered synthetic area after control.

After determining major/area so urce status, the capital and annual costs of installing a

DLA were estimated, if doing so was estimated to enable the facility to become synthetic area,

and added to the estimated emissions testing costs (Holloway, 2015a). The DLA costs were

estimated using model costs developed based on cost and parameter information from BSCP

industry responses to the 2008 s ection 114 survey (Holloway, 2015a). The costs for each kiln

were then summed for each facility considered synt hetic area after control. If the facility would

still be major even with a DLA installed on each uncontrolled kiln, the costs were left blank. If

the potential action was “None” ( i.e. , the kiln was already controlled or the facility was already

expected to be a synthetic area source), the fa cility costs were set equal to the estimated

emissions testing costs (Holloway, 2015a).

IV. Cost and Emission Reduction Esti mates for Meeting Heal th-Based Standards

For the acid gases HF, HCl, and Cl 2 

# , a health-based emission limit (HBEL) was

developed for acid gases under CAA section 112(d )(4). The rationale behind the standard is

discussed in the preamble to the final BSCP Manufacturing NESHAP. The development of the

facility-level HBEL, 250 tons pe r year (tpy) of HCl-equivalent (57 pounds per hour (lb/hr) of

HCl-equivalent), is docum ented in the memorandum Risk Assessment to Determine a HealthBased Emission Limitation for Acid Gases fo r the Brick and Structural Clay Products

# 7 Manufacturing Source Category (Morris et al, 2014). Th e methodology for estimating the

impacts of meeting this HBEL is described in this section; Appendix B shows the detailed

calculations for each BSCP tunnel kiln and facility.

The equivalency of HCl with HF and Cl 2 

# is based on the chronic Reference

Concentration (RfC) values for each of the acid gases. The RfC for HCl is 20 micrograms per

cubic meter (μg/m 3 

# ), the RfC for HF is 14 μg/m 3 

# , and the RfC for Cl 2 

# is 0.15 μg/m 3 

# (Morris et al,

2014). Therefore, the following equation can be us ed to calculate the HC l-equivalent emissions

for an individual kiln:



#  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

      

 

 

 

 

 

2 2



# Cl HCl

Cl

HF HCl

HF HCl i 

# RfC RfC

E RfC RfC

E E E

where:

E = HCl-equivalent emissions, lb/hr

E HCl 

# = emissions of HCl, lb/hr

E HF 

# = emissions of HF, lb/hr

E Cl2 

# = emissions of Cl 2 

# , lb/hr

RfC HCl 

# = reference concentration for HCl, 20 μg/m 3



# RfC HF 

# = reference concentration for HF, 14 μg/m 3



# RfC Cl2 

# = reference concentration for chlorine, 0.15 μg/m 3



# Design capacities are available for each tunnel kiln at each major source facility in the

BSCP industry, and permitted capacities are avai lable for some tunnel kilns (Holloway, 2015b).

Test data are available for some of the kilns in the BSCP industry (Raymond, 2015). If test data

were not available for all acid gas emissions ( i.e. , HF, HCl, and Cl 2 

# ), emission factors were used

to estimate emissions. This information was us ed in the equation abov e to calculate an HClequivalent value for each kiln. The HCl-equiva lent values were summed for each kiln at a

facility and then compared to the HBEL. If a facility did not meet the HBEL, the type of control

needed was determined based on factors such as the current kiln APCD, the number of kilns at

the facility, and how much the HCl-equivalent emissions exceeded the HBEL. (Note that the

final costs and emission reductions for each kiln were not calculated until the impacts for

meeting the PM/non-Hg HAP metals and Hg limits were assessed as described in Section V of

this memorandum.)

As shown in Appendix B, all but one BSCP facility could meet the HBEL with current

control configurations. The facility not meeting the limit is Belden Brick Company’s facility in

Sugarcreek, Ohio, with an HCl-e quivalent estimate of 120 lb/hr fr om a total of 10 tunnel kilns,

some of which are vented together through a common stack or APCD. Most of the HClequivalent emissions (about 71 pe rcent) are generated by the thr ee kilns controlled by a SD/ESP

at the part of the facility known as Plant #8. Removing the SD/ESP and retrofitting the stack

# 8 with a DIFF is expected to reduce HCl-equivale nt emissions well below the HBEL, even without

reducing emissions from any of the ot her seven kilns at this facility.

V. Cost and Emission Reduction Estima tes for Meeting Hg and non-Hg HAP Metals

Standards

There are 169 tunnel k ilns with 148 stacks at facilities currently classified as major

sources in the BSCP industry. There are 24 t unnel kilns with 20 stack s at the 16 facilities

identified in Section III of this memorandum th at could become synthetic area sources with

minimal cost, leaving 145 tunne l kilns with 128 stack s potentially impacted by the Hg and nonHg HAP metals standards. A summary of these kilns by size and APCD is shown in Table 4; the

stack counts for these kilns were used for all remaining analyses in this memorandum.

Table 4. Summary of Major Source BSCP Kilns and APCD

Kiln Size APCD Type Number of Kilns Number of Kiln

Stacks

Large Kilns DIFF or DLS/FF 9 8

DLA 18 14

None 31 30

Small Kilns SD/ESP 3 1

None 84 75

Total 145 128



# The BSCP Manufacturing NESHAP includes MACT standards for Hg and for non-Hg

HAP metals (with PM as a surrogate) (see the memorandum Final Maximum Achievable Control

Technology (MACT) Floor Analysis for Brick and Structural Clay Products (Raymond and

Sroka, 2015) for additional information on these sta ndards). As noted previ ously, test data were

available for some kilns in the industry (includi ng major and synthetic area sources). Data on

PM emissions were available for about 40 perc ent of the kilns, while Hg and non-Hg HAP

metals data were only available for about 10 percent or less of the kilns (Raymond, 2015).

Therefore, rather than evaluating the impacts of the standards on a kiln-b y-kiln basis, as was

done for the HBEL, several assumptions were ne eded to evaluate th e impacts on the whole

industry. This analysis was completed in a series of four steps, described in the remainder of this

section.

Step 1: Compare Test Da ta to Emission Limits

The first step was to compare the data av ailable with the emission limits to get an

estimate of the percentage of t unnel kilns in the industr y that could meet the limits with current

APCD configurations. Table 5 shows the percentages for the PM and Hg lb/ton and

concentration emission limits by kiln size and the most common types of APCD (for PM).

# 9 Table 5. Percentages of BSCP Tunnel Kiln Stacks at Major and Synthetic Area Sources

With Data Less Than or Equal to Emission Limits

Pollutant Kiln Size APCD Type Number of

Kiln Stacks

with Data a 

# Percentage of Kilns Meeting b



# lb/ton

Limit Concentration

Limit At Least

One Limit

PM Large Kilns DIFF or DLS/FF 23 (22) 34.8% 40.9% 60.9%

DLA 29 (21) 3.4% 4.8% 6.9%

None 3 33.3% 33.3% 33.3%

Small Kilns DIFF or DLS/FF 1 100% 100% 100%

DLA 0 ND ND ND

None 13 (10) 53.8% 10.0% 53.8%

Hg Large Kilns All 18 16.7% 55.6% 55.6%

Small Kilns All 1 100% 100% 100%

a 

# Value in parentheses indicates availability of valid concentra tion data with oxygen concentration reported, if different

from the number of kiln stacks with valid mass emissions data. PM data were also available for one stack controlled

by a SD/ESP (small kilns) and three large kilns with wet scr ubbers. Those kilns are not shown in the counts for PM

emissions data because the SD/ESP is ex pected to be replaced with a DIFF (see Section IV of this memorandum)

and all three wet scrubbers are located at synthetic area so urces, so the results for those APCD are not needed for

purposes of estimating impacts on major source facilities. In addition, the analysis does not assume that wet

scrubbers will be installed or retrofitt ed to meet the PM standards. These kiln s are included in the counts for Hg

data; because none of the APCD cu rrently in use in the BSCP industry target Hg reductions, the ability to meet the

Hg standards is not expected to be affected by type of current APCD.

b 

# ND = no test data available for that pollutant, kiln size, and APCD combination.



# Of the large kilns with both PM and Hg data, three of the 18 kiln stac ks meet at least one

of the PM and one of the Hg limits. For small k ilns, Hg data are only available for three kilns

vented together and controlled with a SD/ESP; th is device also meets the PM concentration limit

for small kilns.

Step 2: Develop Preliminary Estimate of Number of APCD Needed

The percentages from Table 5 were applied to the kiln stack counts in Table 4 to

determine the number of kiln stacks estimated to be able to meet the MACT floor limits. From

these estimates, preliminary estimates of the num ber of APCD needed to be installed were

developed using the following criteria:

 If the kiln is expected to meet both a PM and a Hg limit, no additional APCD is

needed.

 If an uncontrolled kiln or a kiln with a DLA can meet a Hg limit but none of the PM

limits, a FF will be needed.

 If an uncontrolled kiln or a kiln with a DLA cannot meet either of the Hg limits, a FF

with activated carbon injecti on (ACI) will be needed rega rdless of whether the kiln

can meet a PM limit, as the FF will be need ed for the capture of the activated carbon

injected into the gas stream.

 If a kiln with a DIFF or DLS/FF cannot meet either of the Hg limits, ACI will be

added to the existing control device.

# 10 Table 6 shows the preliminary estimate of the number of APCD needed based only on

these criteria and the percentages in Table 5, ro unded to the nearest whole number. If multiple

kilns were vented together, only one APCD was a ssigned to the stack. As noted in Step 3, there

are two other factors to take in to account to determine the final estimate of the number of APCD

needed and the impacts on the major source kilns.

Table 6. Summary of Major Source BSCP Kiln Stacks and Preliminary Estimate of APCD

to Be Installed

Kiln Size Existing APCD

Type Number

of Kiln

Stacks Number

of Kiln

Stacks

Meeting

PM Limit Number

of Kiln

Stacks

Meeting

Hg

Limit Initial Estimate of Kiln Stacks

Install FF Install FF

with ACI Add ACI

Large Kilns DIFF or DLS/FF 8 5 a 

# 3 0 0 5

DLA 14 1 8 7 6 0

None b 

# 30 10 17 12 13 0

Small Kilns SD/ESP c 

# 1 0 1 0 0 0

None 75 40 75 35 0 0

Total 128 56 105 48 20 5

a 

# Because the three kiln stacks not m eeting the PM lb/ton or concentration limi ts are already controlled with a PM

APCD, none of the preliminary assumptions apply. If thes e kiln stacks cannot meet the lb/hr non-Hg HAP metals

limit, or if they are not located at a facility that coul d become a synthetic area source by installing a DLA on an

uncontrolled kiln, the DIFF or DLS/FF will have to be retrofit with a new DIFF.

b 

# Assumes that less than 20 percent of kiln stacks can meet both PM and Hg limits.

c 

# The SD/ESP is expected to be replaced with a DIFF (see Section IV of this memorandum).



# Step 3: Refine the Estimate of Number of APCD Needed

The next step in determining the number of APCD required to be installed included

considering the impact of the lb /hr limits for Hg and total non-Hg HAP meta ls. The total non-Hg

HAP metals limit is expected to provide addi tional flexibility to tunnel kiln owners and

operators, particularly for small tunnel kilns. Where total non-Hg HAP metals lb/hr data were

available, the values were compiled for each kiln . If PM data were available but non-Hg HAP

metals data were not, the total non-Hg HAP meta l lb/hr value was calcula ted using the average

ratio of metals to PM emissions in BSCP st ack tests (Raymond, 2015). The non-Hg HAP metal

values for each kiln are shown in Appendix C. While it is also expected that the lb/hr limit for

Hg will provide additional flexibility to tunnel ki ln owners and operators, again particularly for

small tunnel kilns, the impact of the lb/hr Hg limit is not assessed quantitatively in this analysis.

Instead, it was expected that most kilns that could meet the lb/hr Hg limit could also meet either

the lb/ton limit or the concentration limit.

The other factor to be taken into account in determining the number of APCD required to

be installed is the number of kilns located at faci lities that could elect to become synthetic area

sources. The cost for each facility to do so wa s estimated as described in Section III of this

# 11 memorandum. However, as noted previously in th is section, because test data are not available

for every tunnel kiln in the industry, compliance costs were not estimated for each kiln and

facility. Therefore, the cost to become a synthe tic area source could not be compared directly to

the cost of compliance. For example, while the analysis estimates that the Ragland Clay

Products facility in Ragland, Alabama, could become a synthetic area source at an annual cost of

$362,156 (see Appendix A), test data are not available to show th e facility’s exact level of

emissions. If performance testing of the tunnel kiln at this facil ity shows that the kiln already

meets the limits, then installing a control device to become a synthetic area source will not be

necessary.

Therefore, the preliminary APCD estimates in Table 6, the total non-Hg HAP metals

lb/hr limit, and the ability of certain facilities to become synthetic area were considered together

on a more general basis. The following assumptions were used to refine the preliminary APCD

estimates:

 For large kilns with a DIFF or DLS/FF, it was assumed that the three kiln stacks not

meeting either the PM lb/ton or concentra tion limits will meet the total non-Hg HAP

metals lb/hr limit.

 For large kilns with a DLA, it was assumed that one of the kiln stacks not meeting the

Hg lb/ton or concentration limits will meet the Hg lb/hr limit. It was also assumed

that this kiln stack is one of the 12 stacks that can meet one of the PM limits, so no FF

will be needed.

 Based on the results of the analysis desc ribed in Section III of this memorandum, a

total of 11 large uncontrolled k iln stacks are located at f acilities that could become

synthetic area sources with installation of a DLA on those stacks. For large

uncontrolled kilns, it was assumed that owners or operators of a bout three-fourths of

these kiln stacks, or eight total stacks, will elect to install a DLA. To be conservative,

it was estimated that most of the remaining kiln stacks will not be able to meet any of

the Hg limits.

 It was expected that all small uncontrolle d kilns not meeting the PM lb/ton or

concentration limits will be able to meet the total non-Hg HAP metals lb/hr limit.

In addition, the MACT floors for Hg were revised from proposal to account for

variability in the Hg content of raw material sa mpling data provided by nume rous facilities (BIA,

2015; Raymond and Sroka, 2015). The only availabl e Hg emissions data reported for a small

kiln was from Belden Bricks, Plant #8 in S ugarcreek, Ohio. The emissions were 0.000176 lb/ton

and 17.4 μg/dscm at 17 percent O 2 

# , and the facility’s average Hg content in the raw material was

49.4 ppb. The ratio of emissions to Hg content, therefore, is 3.57 E-06 for lb/ton and 0.35 for

concentration. Because most of the Hg emissions ar e the result of Hg in the raw materials, it was

assumed that the emissions for the facilities th at reported raw material sampling data could be

approximated by using these ratios. The maximum Hg content reported in a raw material sample

was 208 ppb, reported at the Boral Bricks faci lity in Gleason, Tennessee. Using the ratios

calculated for Belden Sugarcreek Plant #8, the emissions at Boral Gleason could be

0.000742 lb/ton and 73.1 μg/dscm at 17 percent O 2 

# . These emissions levels suggest that the

worst case facility ( i.e. , Boral Gleason) would not meet the Hg lb/ton limit for small kilns but

would meet the Hg concentration limit for small kilns. Therefore, it was assumed that all small

kilns would be able to meet the Hg con centration limit with no additional controls.

# 12 The final estimates of APCD counts are shown in Table 7.

Table 7. Summary of Major Source BSCP Kiln Stacks and Estimate of APCD to Be

Installed

Kiln Size Existing

APCD Type Number

of Kiln

Stacks Estimate of Kiln Stacks

Install

FF Install

FF with

ACI Add

ACI Retrofit

with a

DIFF Install

DLA a 

# No

Change

in

APCD

Large Kilns DIFF or

DLS/FF 8 0 0 5 0 0 3

DLA 14 7 5 0 0 0 2

None 30 6 11 0 0 8 5

Small Kilns SD/ESP a 

# 1 0 0 0 1 0 0

None 75 0 0 0 0 0 75

Total 128 13 16 5 1 8 85

a 

# See Section IV of this memorandum.



# Step 4: Calculate the Nationwide Costs, Emission Reductions, and Secondary Impacts

The final step in estimating nationwide costs and impacts was to apply model APCD

costs, emission reductions, and secondary impact s to the APCD counts shown in Table 7. The

model APCD size is based on the design capacity(ie s) of the kiln(s) routed to that emission

point/APCD. For example, two small kilns vented together with a total design capacity of less

than 10 tph would be controlled with a small APCD, whereas two small kilns vented together

that have a total design capacity of more than 10 tph would be contro lled with a large APCD.

As noted in Section IV of this memora ndum, Belden Brick Company’s facility in

Sugarcreek, Ohio, was identified as not meeting th e HBEL with the current APCD at the kiln, so

the emissions at the kilns were evaluated individually. The three kilns routed to the SD/ESP at

Sugarcreek are small kilns, but the sum of the to tal kiln capacity vented to the SD/ESP is greater

than 10 tph. Therefore, for purposes of this anal ysis, the DIFF installed to replace the SD/ESP

will be a large DIFF.

Table 8 shows the summary of nationwide co sts for BSCP kilns, Table 9 shows the

summary of nationwide emission reductions fo r BSCP kilns at major sources, and Table 10

shows the summary of nationwide secondary impacts for BSCP kilns at major sources.

# 13 Table 8. Summary of Nationwide Control Costs for Major Sources to Meet Standards

Current

APCD Action APCD

Size Unit

Capital

Cost a 

# Unit

Annual

Cost a 

# Number

of APCD Total

Capital

Cost Total

Annual

Cost

DIFF or

DLS/FF Add ACI Large $146,697 $105,763 5 $733,483 $528,817

DLA Install FF

with ACI Large $1,646,697 $685,304 5 $8,233,483 $3,426,522

DLA Install FF Large $1,500,000 $579,541 7 $10,500,000 $4,056,787

SD/ESP Retrofit

with a DIFF Large $3,820,000 $1,017,978 1 $3,820,000 $1,017,978

None Install FF Large $1,500,000 $579,541 6 $9,000,000 $3,477,246

None Install FF

with ACI Large $1,646,697 $685,304 11 $18,113,663 $7,538,349

None Install DLA Large $1,489,548 $459,886 8 $11,916,381 $3,679,090

Total Nationwide Control Costs 43 $62,317,010 $23,724,789



# Number of kiln

stacks per plant Capital

cost per

stack, $ Annualized

cost per

stack, $/yr b 

# Number

of Stacks Total

Capital

Cost Total

Annual

Cost

1 $19,000 $4,600 40 $760,000 $184,000

2 $29,000 $7,100 31 $899,000 $220,100

3 $40,000 $9,800 11 $440,000 $107,800

4 $51,000 $12,400 2 $102,000 $24,800

5 $61,000 $14,900 1 $61,000 $14,900

$2,262,000 $551,600

Monitoring (major sources only $2,984 118 $352,112

Grand Total $64,579,010 $24,628,501

a 

# Unit costs from Holloway (2015a), except for the DLA capi tal and annual costs. The DLA capital and annual costs

shown in this table were increased to account for the fa ct that if a DLA is insta lled for a facility to become a

synthetic area source, it will need to be installed earlier than an APCD installed to comply with the BSCP

Manufacturing NESHAP. To compare the equivalent net present values for a ll APCD for purposes of this analysis,

a DLA was expected to be installed 6 months earlier than other APCD, increasing the capital cost by about 3

percent (calculated assuming 7 percent interest over half a year, or 1.07 0.5 

# ). The total annual cost increased due to

the increase in the annualized capital cost.

b 

# Annualized cost based on 7% interest, 5-yr period.14Table 9. Summary of Nationwide Emission Reductions for Major Sources to Meet StandardsCurrentAPCDActionAPCDSizeEmissionsTypeNumberofAPCDEmissions Reductions (tpy)HFHClCl2HAPMetalsPMHgSO2PM2.5aDIFF orDLS/FFAdd ACI Large Unit 0 0 0 0 0 0.00349 0 0Total 5 0 0 0 0 0 0.01745 0 0DLA Install FFwith ACILarge Unit 0 0 0 0.198 18.0 0.00349 0 8.64Total 5 0 0 0 0.99 90.0 0.0174 0 43.2DLA Install FF Large Unit 0 0 0 0.20 18.0 0 0 8.64Total 7 0 0 0 1.39 126.0 0 0 60.5SD/ESP Retrofit witha DIFFLarge Unit 41.9 9.38 1.28 0 0 0 1.56 0Total 1 41.9 9.38 1.28 0 0 0 1.56 0None Install FF Large Unit 0 0 0 0.251 22.9 0 0 10.97Total 6 0 0 0 1.509 137.1 0 0 65.8None Install FFwith ACILarge Unit 0 0 0 0.251 22.9 0.00349 0 10.97Total 11 0 0 0 2.77 251 0.0384 0 120.7None Install DLA Large Unit 37.7 1.59 0.0954 0.0535 4.86 0 25.5 2.33Total 8 302 12.7 0.763 0.428 38.9 0 204 18.7Total Nationwide 43 344 22.1 2.04 7.08 643 0.0733 205 309aEstimated as 48 percent of PM reductions.15Table 10. Summary of Nationwide Secondary Impacts for Major Sources to Meet StandardsaCurrentAPCDActionAPCDSizeEmissionsTypeNumberofAPCDEnergyimpacts,MMBtu/yrSolidwasteimpacts,tpyWastewaterimpacts,gpySecondary Air Emissions Increase (tpy)PMPM2.5CONOxSO2DIFF orDLS/FFAdd ACI Large Unit 621 20.1 -- 0.00458 0.00154 0.00772 0.0614 0.179Total 5 3,105 100.7 0.0229 0.00768 0.0386 0.307 0.894DLA Install FFwith ACILarge Unit 14,730 43.0 -- 0.1087 0.0364 0.183 1.46 4.24Total 5 73,651 215 0.543 0.182 0.916 7.28 21.2DLA Install FF Large Unit 14,109 23 0.104 0.035 0.176 1.39 4.1Total 7 98,764 160 0.729 0.244 1.229 9.76 28.4SD/ESP Retrofit witha DIFFLarge Unit -27,577 15.1 -4,563 -0.203 -0.0682 -0.343 -2.73 -7.94Total 1 -27,577 15.1 -4,563 -0.203 -0.0682 -0.343 -2.73 -7.94None Install FF Large Unit 14,109 22.9 -- 0.1041 0.0349 0.176 1.39 4.06Total 6 84,655 137.1 0.624 0.2094 1.053 8.37 24.39None Install FFwith ACILarge Unit 14,730 43.0 -- 0.1087 0.0364 0.183 1.46 4.24Total 11 162,032 473 1.20 0.401 2.02 16.0 46.7None Install DLA Large Unit 8,337 513 -- 0.0615 0.0206 0.1037 0.824 2.40Total 8 66,698 4,107 0.492 0.165 0.830 6.59 19.2Total Nationwide 43 461,329 5,208 -4,563 3.40 1.141 5.74 45.6 132.9aA negative increase in secondary impacts is equivalent to a reduction in secondary impacts.

# 16 VI. References

[BIA, 2015 – submission of raw materi al sampling data to EPA, 2015]

Holloway, T. 2015a. Methodology and Assumptions Used to Estimate the Model Costs and

Impacts of BSCP Air Pollution C ontrol Devices for the Final Rule . Memorandum from

Thomas Holloway, RTI International, to Sharon Nizich, EPA/OAQ PS/SPPD. ***, 2015.

Holloway, T. 2015b. Updated BSCP Inventory Database and Documentation for Brick and

Structural Clay Products Manufacturing Final Rule . Memorandum from Thomas Holloway,

RTI International, to Sharon Nizich, EPA/OAQPS/SPPD. ***, 2015.

Morris, M., T. Palma, and C. Sarsony. 2014. Risk Assessment to Determine a Health-Based

Emission Limitation for Acid Gases for th e Brick and Structural Clay Products

Manufacturing Source Category . Memorandum from Mark Morris, Ted Palma, and Chris

Sarsony, EPA/OAQPS/HEID, to Dock et EPA-HQ-OAR-2013-0291. May 19, 2014.

Raymond, G. 2015. Test Data Used in BSCP Final Rule . Memorandum from Gabrielle

Raymond, RTI International, to Shar on Nizich, EPA/OAQPS/SPPD. ***, 2015.

Raymond, G and K. Sroka. 2015. Final Maximum Achievable Control Technology (MACT)

Floor Analysis for Brick and Structural Clay Products . Memorandum from Gabrielle

Raymond and Kristin Sroka, RTI Internationa l, to Sharon Nizich, EPA/OAQPS/SPPD. ***,

2015.

# Appendix A

Analysis of the Cost to Facilities to Become Synthetic Area SourcesA-1Table A-1. Kiln ListKiln IDFacilityIDCompany NameFacility NameCityStateCombinedDesignCapacity(tph)OperatingHoursAPCDAPCDSize502 ACME-3 Acme Brick Company Acme- Bennett TunnelPlant (BTP)Millsap TX 15.98 8352 DLS/FF LCD507 ACME-8 Acme Brick Company Acme- Elgin Plant(ELP/ENP)Elgin TX 10.00 8400 None LCD508 ACME-8 Acme Brick Company Acme- Elgin Plant(ELP/ENP)Elgin TX 19.10 8760 DIFF LCD509 ACME-9 Acme Brick Company Acme- Eureka Plant(EBP)Clarksville AR 3.99 8760 None SCD510 ACME-9 Acme Brick Company Acme- Eureka Plant(EBP)Clarksville AR 3.99 1416 None SCD511 ACME-9 Acme Brick Company Acme- Eureka Plant(EBP)Clarksville AR 3.99 8760 None SCD512 ACME-12 Acme Brick Company Acme- Holly SpringsPlant (HSP)HollySpringsMS 8.45 8760 None SCD513 ACME-14 Acme Brick Company Acme- Kanapolis Plant(KAP)Kanopolis KS 5.78 8760 None SCD500 ACME-1 Acme Brick Company Acme- Ochs Brick Plant(AOP)Springfield MN 6.25 7665 None SCD501 ACME-1 Acme Brick Company Acme- Ochs Brick Plant(AOP)Springfield MN 6.25 7665 None SCD515 ACME-18 Acme Brick Company Acme- Perla Plant(PEP/PWP)Malvern AR 9.66 8760 None SCD516 ACME-18 Acme Brick Company Acme- Perla Plant(PEP/PWP)Malvern AR 7.86 8760 None SCD518 ACME-20 Acme Brick Company Acme- Texas Clay Plant(TCP)Malakoff TX 10.20 8760 DLA LCD519/520 ACME-20 Acme Brick Company Acme- Texas Clay Plant(TCP)Malakoff TX 10.20 8760 None LCD521 ACME-21 Acme Brick Company Acme- Tulsa Plant (TUP) Tulsa OK 8.51 8760 None SCDA-2Kiln IDFacilityIDCompany NameFacility NameCityStateCombinedDesignCapacity(tph)OperatingHoursAPCDAPCDSize522 ACME-23 Acme Brick Company Acme- Wheeler Plant(WTP)Jonesboro AR 7.01 8760 None SCD684 35 Acme Brick Company Jenkins- Coosaada Plant Coosaada AL 9.50 7080 None SCD685 35 Acme Brick Company Jenkins- Coosaada Plant Coosaada AL 9.50 7080 None SCD523 2 American Eagle BrickCoAmerican Eagle Brick Co SunlandParkNM 3.40 7000 None SCD526 BELD-1 Belden BrickCompanyBelden- Plant #2SugarcreekSugarcreek OH 10.65 8760 DIFF LCD527 BELD-1 Belden BrickCompanyBelden- Plant #3SugarcreekSugarcreek OH 13.70 8760 DIFF LCD528/529/530BELD-1 Belden BrickCompanyBelden- Plant #6SugarcreekSugarcreek OH 15.96 8760 None LCD531/532/533BELD-1 Belden BrickCompanyBelden- Plant #8SugarcreekSugarcreek OH 23.31 8760 SD/ESP LCD534/535 BELD-1 Belden BrickCompanyBelden- Plant #9SugarcreekSugarcreek OH 6.10 8760 None SCD536 BELD-2 Belden BrickCompanyBelden- Plant 1 Strasburg Strasburg OH 3.08 0 None SCD537/538 BORA-1 Boral Bricks Inc. Boral- Atlanta Plant Smyrna GA 29.94 6264 DIFF LCD539 BORA-2 Boral Bricks Inc. Boral- Augusta Plant 6 Augusta GA 11.25 8424 None LCD540 BORA-2 Boral Bricks Inc. Boral- Augusta Plant 6 Augusta GA 11.25 8064 None LCD545 BORA-4 Boral Bricks Inc. Boral- Bessemer Plant #5 Bessemer AL 12.00 8760 None LCD546 BORA-4 Boral Bricks Inc. Boral- Bessemer Plant #5 Bessemer AL 12.00 7608 None LCD547/548 BORA-5 Boral Bricks Inc. Boral- Bessemer Plant #6 Bessemer AL 25.02 8016 DIFF LCD549 BORA-6 Boral Bricks Inc. Boral- Gleason Plant Gleason TN 9.80 8760 None SCD550 BORA-6 Boral Bricks Inc. Boral- Gleason Plant Gleason TN 9.80 8760 None SCD551/552 BORA-7 Boral Bricks Inc. Boral- Henderson Facility Henderson TX 22.66 8760 DLA LCD558 BORA-13 Boral Bricks Inc. Boral- Muskogee Plant Muskogee OK 23.43 8256 DIFF LCD559 BORA-14 Boral Bricks Inc. Boral- Phenix City-Plant 3 Phenix City AL 10.00 8136 None LCD560 BORA-14 Boral Bricks Inc. Boral- Phenix City-Plant 3 Phenix City AL 10.00 7080 None LCDA-3Kiln IDFacilityIDCompany NameFacility NameCityStateCombinedDesignCapacity(tph)OperatingHoursAPCDAPCDSize561 BORA-15 Boral Bricks Inc. Boral- Phenix City-Plant 4 Phenix City AL 11.20 5664 None LCD562 BORA-15 Boral Bricks Inc. Boral- Phenix City-Plant 4 Phenix City AL 11.20 8760 None LCD563 BORA-15 Boral Bricks Inc. Boral- Phenix City-Plant 4 Phenix City AL 13.50 6744 None LCD566 BORA-17 Boral Bricks Inc. Boral- Salisbury Plant Salisbury NC 27.80 8760 DIFF LCD567 BORA-18 Boral Bricks Inc. Boral- Terre Haute Plant Terre Haute IN 26.00 8760 DIFF LCD996 Bram Brampton Brick Ltd. Brampton Brick, Inc. Farmersburg IN 24.60 8760 DIFF LCD699 181 CertainteedCorporationCertainteed CorporationLudowiciNewLexingtonOH 7.78 8760 None SCD575 19 Cherokee Brick & TileCoCherokee Brick & Tile Macon GA 5.48 6240 None SCD576 19 Cherokee Brick & TileCoCherokee Brick & Tile Macon GA 5.48 6240 None SCD577/578 19 Cherokee Brick & TileCoCherokee Brick & Tile Macon GA 29.48 6240 DLA LCD581 34 Columbus Brick Co Columbus BrickCompanyColumbus MS 7.90 7920 None SCD582 34 Columbus Brick Co Columbus BrickCompanyColumbus MS 7.90 7920 None SCD583 34 Columbus Brick Co Columbus BrickCompanyColumbus MS 18.30 7920 DLA LCD584 134 Commercial BrickCorpCommercial Brick Corp Wewoka OK 12.26 4680 None LCD585 134 Commercial BrickCorpCommercial Brick Corp Wewoka OK 12.26 4680 None LCD586 134 Commercial BrickCorpCommercial Brick Corp Wewoka OK 12.26 4680 None LCD587 64 Continental Brick Co Continental BrickMartinsburgMartinsburg WV 8.35 7920 None SCD588 64 Continental Brick Co Continental BrickMartinsburgMartinsburg WV 8.35 7920 None SCD594 153 Elgin-Butler Brick Co Elgin Butler Plant Elgin TX 1.53 7920 None SCDA-4Kiln IDFacilityIDCompany NameFacility NameCityStateCombinedDesignCapacity(tph)OperatingHoursAPCDAPCDSize595 153 Elgin-Butler Brick Co Elgin Butler Plant Elgin TX 1.53 7920 None SCD596 23 Endicott ClayProducts CoEndicott Clay Products Fairbury NE 9.00 6720 None SCD597 23 Endicott ClayProducts CoEndicott Clay Products Fairbury NE 9.00 6720 None SCD598 23 Endicott ClayProducts CoEndicott Clay Products Fairbury NE 8.86 6720 None SCD599 158 General Finance, Inc General Finance- CloudCeramicsConcordia KS 6.17 4944 DIFF SCD590 83 General Shale Brick,IncCunningham- ClevelandCoGrover NC 9.08 7920 None SCD605 GENE-5 General Shale Brick,IncGeneral Shale Brick-Plant40Coosa GA 18.75 8760 DIFF LCD606 GENE-5 General Shale Brick,IncGeneral Shale Brick-Plant40Coosa GA 18.75 8760 DIFF LCD612/613 GENE-8 General Shale Brick,IncGeneral Shale BrickPlants 35 & 36Blue Ridge(Roanoke)VA 20.20 8760 DLA LCD614 GENE-8 General Shale Brick,IncGeneral Shale BrickPlants 35 & 36Blue Ridge(Roanoke)VA 22.00 8760 DLA LCD615 GENE-9 General Shale Brick,IncGeneral Shale BrickPlants 6 & 28Atkins(Marion)VA 3.68 8760 None SCD616 GENE-9 General Shale Brick,IncGeneral Shale BrickPlants 6 & 28Atkins(Marion)VA 3.68 8760 None SCD617 GENE-9 General Shale Brick,IncGeneral Shale BrickPlants 6 & 28Atkins(Marion)VA 15.02 8760 DLA LCD618 GENE-15 General Shale Brick,IncGeneral Shale- CorbinPlant 33Woodbine KY 9.90 0 None SCD619 GENE-15 General Shale Brick,IncGeneral Shale- CorbinPlant 33Woodbine KY 14.40 0 None LCD622/623 GENE-11 General Shale Brick,IncGeneral Shale- MoncureFacilityMoncure NC 27.40 8760 None LCDA-5Kiln IDFacilityIDCompany NameFacility NameCityStateCombinedDesignCapacity(tph)OperatingHoursAPCDAPCDSize624 GENE-11 General Shale Brick,IncGeneral Shale- MoncureFacilityMoncure NC 20.55 8760 DLA LCD625 GENE-11 General Shale Brick,IncGeneral Shale- MoncureFacilityMoncure NC 20.55 8760 DLA LCD626/627 GENE-12 General Shale Brick,IncGeneral Shale RobinsonBrick Co.-Plant 2Denver CO 20.40 8760 DLA LCD635 GLEN-1 Glen Gery Glen-Gery CorporationBiglerBigler PA 16.20 6225 None LCD636 GLEN-1 Glen Gery Glen-Gery CorporationBiglerBigler PA 16.20 6225 None LCD637 GLEN-2 Glen Gery Glen-Gery CorporationCaledoniaCaledonia OH 8.89 6408 None SCD638 GLEN-2 Glen Gery Glen-Gery CorporationCaledoniaCaledonia OH 8.89 6408 None SCD639 GLEN-3 Glen Gery Glen-Gery CorporationCapitolManassas VA 16.70 0 None LCD644 GLEN-8 Glen Gery Glen-Gery CorporationMarseillesMarseilles IL 15.54 6648 DLA LCD645 GLEN-8 Glen Gery Glen-Gery CorporationMarseillesMarseilles IL 15.96 6648 DLA LCD642 GLEN-5 Glen Gery Glen-Gery CorporationRedfieldRedfield IA 10.94 6552 None LCD648 GLEN-10 Glen Gery Glen-Gery CorporationYorkYork PA 11.24 7032 None LCD649 GLEN-10 Glen Gery Glen-Gery CorporationYorkYork PA 19.76 7896 DLA LCD650 HANS2 Hanson Brick East,LLCHanson- Athens Athens TX 9.53 8760 None SCD671 HANS13 Hanson Brick East,LLCHanson- Columbia - Plant2Columbia SC 11.30 8352 None LCD672 HANS13 Hanson Brick East,LLCHanson- Columbia - Plant2Columbia SC 11.30 8352 None LCDA-6Kiln IDFacilityIDCompany NameFacility NameCityStateCombinedDesignCapacity(tph)OperatingHoursAPCDAPCDSize673/674 HANS14 Hanson Brick East,LLCHanson- Columbia - Plant4Columbia SC 22.60 8280 DLA LCD652 HANS5 Hanson Brick East,LLCHanson- Elgin Elgin TX 11.50 8760 None LCD653 HANS5 Hanson Brick East,LLCHanson- Elgin Elgin TX 12.20 8760 DLS/FF LCD656 HANS7 Hanson Brick East,LLCHanson- Mineral WellsEastMineralWellsTX 7.99 8760 None SCD662 HANS8 Hanson Brick East,LLCHanson- Monroe Monroe NC 22.80 5832 DLA LCD667 HANS11 Hanson Brick East,LLCHanson- Roseboro Roseboro NC 10.50 6528 None LCD668 HANS11 Hanson Brick East,LLCHanson- Roseboro Roseboro NC 10.50 6528 None LCD669 HANS12 Hanson Brick East,LLCHanson- Stanton Stanton KY 8.00 8604 None SCD677 145 Hebron BrickCompanyHebron Brick Plant Hebron ND 9.60 7600 None SCD679 78 Henry BrickCompany, IncHenry Brick Selma AL 13.10 8760 DLA LCD680 78 Henry BrickCompany, IncHenry Brick Selma AL 13.10 8760 DLA LCD589 178NR InternationalChimney CorpContinental ClayKittanningKittanning PA 2.25 8760 None SCD704/705/706/707184 Ironrock Capital(formerlyMetropolitanCeramics, Inc.)Ironrock Capital (formerlyMetropolitan Ceramics,Inc.)Canton OH 13.32 7700 None LCD689 175NR Kansas Brick and TileCoKansas Brick and Tile Hoisington KS 6.00 8760 None SCD690 104 Kasten Clay ProductsCoKasten Clay Products Jackson MO 3.74 2288 None SCDA-7Kiln IDFacilityIDCompany NameFacility NameCityStateCombinedDesignCapacity(tph)OperatingHoursAPCDAPCDSize703 139 L.P. McNear BrickCo, IncMcNear Brickyard San Rafael CA 8.20 6800 None SCD693 135 Lee Brick and Tile Co Lee Brick Sanford Facility Sanford NC 12.24 7840 None LCD694 135 Lee Brick and Tile Co Lee Brick Sanford Facility Sanford NC 9.64 7840 None SCD695 135 Lee Brick and Tile Co Lee Brick Sanford Facility Sanford NC 12.67 7840 None LCD696 135 Lee Brick and Tile Co Lee Brick Sanford Facility Sanford NC 13.50 7840 DLA LCD701 50 Marion Ceramics, Inc Marion Ceramics Pee Dee SC 3.13 8760 None SCD702 42 McAvoy Brick Co McAvoy Brick Phoenixville PA 12.00 7920 None LCD592 MOHA-4 Mohawk Industries Dal-Tile, Fayette,AlabamaFayette AL 3.56 6024 None SCD593 MOHA-4 Mohawk Industries Dal-Tile, Fayette,AlabamaFayette AL 3.56 6024 None SCD178 MOHA-6 Mohawk Industries Dal-Tile, Lewisport,KentuckyLewisport KY 1.75 6024 None SCD179 MOHA-6 Mohawk Industries Dal-Tile, Lewisport,KentuckyLewisport KY 1.98 6024 None SCD180 MOHA-6 Mohawk Industries Dal-Tile, Lewisport,KentuckyLewisport KY 1.98 6024 None SCD709 87 Mutual Materials Co Mutual Materials- Mica Mica WA 9.60 7920 None SCD710 88 Mutual Materials Co Mutual MaterialsNewcastleRenton WA 7.52 7080 None SCD711 68 Old Virginia Brick Co Old Virginia- MadisonHeightsMadisonHeightsVA 8.44 4800 None SCD712 69 Old Virginia Brick Co Old Virginia- Salem Salem VA 6.77 4800 None SCD713 69 Old Virginia Brick Co Old Virginia- Salem Salem VA 4.65 4800 None SCD714 176NR Pacific Clay Products Pacific Clay ProductsLake ElsinoreLakeElsinoreCA 2.57 8760 None SCD715 176NR Pacific Clay Products Pacific Clay ProductsLake ElsinoreLakeElsinoreCA 2.57 8760 None SCD716 176NR Pacific Clay Products Pacific Clay ProductsLake ElsinoreLakeElsinoreCA 5.14 8760 None SCDA-8Kiln IDFacilityIDCompany NameFacility NameCityStateCombinedDesignCapacity(tph)OperatingHoursAPCDAPCDSize727/728 137 Pine Hall Brick Co,IncPine Hall- Madison Plant Madison NC 19.08 7880 None LCD729/730 137 Pine Hall Brick Co,IncPine Hall- Madison Plant Madison NC 26.60 7880 DLA LCD731/732 137 Pine Hall Brick Co,IncPine Hall- Madison Plant Madison NC 19.20 7880 None LCD735 159 Ragland ClayProducts, LLCRagland Clay Products Ragland AL 3.36 6240 None SCD742 45 Richards Brick Co Richards Brick Edwardsville IL 4.62 2016 None SCD743 45 Richards Brick Co Richards Brick Edwardsville IL 4.62 2016 None SCD747 90 Sioux City Brick andTile CoSioux City- Adel Plant Adel IA 13.10 7920 DLA LCD748 90 Sioux City Brick andTile CoSioux City- Adel Plant Adel IA 16.37 7920 DIFF LCD749 140 Sioux City Brick andTile CoSioux City- Sergeant BluffPlantSergeantBluffIA 11.45 7920 DLA LCD753 46 Statesville Brick Co Statesville Brick Statesville NC 11.00 5000 None LCD754 46 Statesville Brick Co Statesville Brick Statesville NC 9.35 5000 None SCD758 116 Summit PressedBrick and Tile CoSummit- Brick Plant andStorage YardPueblo CO 6.75 7056 None SCD759 186 Summitville Tiles, Inc. Summitville Tiles, Inc.-Minerva PlantMinerva OH 1.11 6240 None SCD760 186 Summitville Tiles, Inc. Summitville Tiles, Inc.-Minerva PlantMinerva OH 1.24 6240 None SCD761 186 Summitville Tiles, Inc. Summitville Tiles, Inc.-Minerva PlantMinerva OH 1.11 6240 None SCD762 186 Summitville Tiles, Inc. Summitville Tiles, Inc.-Minerva PlantMinerva OH 1.11 6240 None SCD766/767 49 Triangle Brick Triangle Brick- MerryOaks PlantMoncure NC 23.70 8760 DLA LCDA-9Kiln IDFacilityIDCompany NameFacility NameCityStateCombinedDesignCapacity(tph)OperatingHoursAPCDAPCDSize768 49 Triangle Brick Triangle Brick- MerryOaks PlantMoncure NC 24.70 8760 DLA LCD769 TriWade Triangle Brick Triangle BrickWadesboro PlantWadesboro NC 20.00 8760 DLA LCD770 TriWade Triangle Brick Triangle BrickWadesboro PlantWadesboro NC 20.00 8760 DLA LCD773 124 Watsontown Brick Co Watsontown Brick Watsontown PA 7.98 8760 None SCD774 124 Watsontown Brick Co Watsontown Brick Watsontown PA 10.00 8760 DIFF LCD775 Whit Whitacre Greer Whitacre Greer Alliance OH 11.90 8760 None LCD776 Whit Whitacre Greer Whitacre Greer Alliance OH 6.80 8760 None SCD777 147 Yankee Hill Brick andTileYankee Hill Brick and Tile Lincoln NE 4.90 6240 None SCDA-10Table A-2. Emissions Estimates, Control Codes, and Test Data Codes by KilnKiln IDEmission Factors from TestData (lb/ton)Average Emission Factors(lb/ton)Kiln Emissions (tpy)ControlCodeTestDataCodeHFHClCl2HFHClCl2HFHClCl2TotalHAP502 0.001966 0.003634 0.002432 0.138 0.254 0.170 0.562 1 2507 0.6045 0.08084 0.003458 26.5 3.54 0.151 30.2 0 0508 0.01797 0.1133 2.747 E051.50 9.48 0.00230 11.0 1 2509 0.6045 0.08084 0.003458 10.6 1.41 0.0604 12.0 0 0510 1.148 0.08084 0.003458 20.1 1.41 0.0604 21.5 0 1511 0.6045 0.08084 0.003458 10.6 1.41 0.0604 12.0 0 0512 0.6045 0.08084 0.003458 22.4 2.99 0.128 25.5 0 0513 0.6045 0.08084 0.003458 15.3 2.05 0.0875 17.4 0 0500 0.6045 0.08084 0.003458 16.5 2.21 0.0947 18.9 0 0501 0.6045 0.08084 0.003458 16.5 2.21 0.0947 18.9 0 0515 0.058 0.6045 0.003458 25.6 2.45 0.146 28.2 0 1516 0.1507 0.08073 0.003458 5.19 2.78 0.119 8.09 0 2518 0.01393 0.1964 0.002441 0.622 8.77 0.109 9.51 1 2519/520 0.6045 0.08084 0.003458 27.0 3.61 0.154 30.8 0 0521 1.316 0.2997 0.003458 49.1 11.2 0.129 60.4 0 2522 0.6045 0.08084 0.003458 18.6 2.48 0.106 21.1 0 0684 0.6045 0.08084 0.003458 25.2 3.36 0.144 28.7 0 0685 0.6045 0.08084 0.003458 25.2 3.36 0.144 28.7 0 0523 0.6045 0.08084 0.003458 9.00 1.20 0.0515 10.3 0 0526 0.04221 0.0294 0.006779 1.97 1.37 0.316 3.66 1 2527 0.07735 0.01228 0.0004661 4.64 0.737 0.0280 5.41 1 2528/529/530 0.5808 0.02998 0.003458 40.6 2.10 0.242 42.9 0 2531/532/533 0.8786 0.2142 0.02721 89.7 21.9 2.78 114 1 2534/535 0.5709 0.03509 0.003458 15.3 0.937 0.0924 16.3 0 2536 0.6045 0.08084 0.003458 8.15 1.09 0.0467 9.29 0 0537/538 0.1054 0.00707 0.002432 13.8 0.927 0.319 15.1 1 2A-11Kiln IDEmission Factors from TestData (lb/ton)Average Emission Factors(lb/ton)Kiln Emissions (tpy)ControlCodeTestDataCodeHFHClCl2HFHClCl2HFHClCl2TotalHAP539 0.272 0.08084 0.003458 13.4 3.98 0.170 17.6 0 1540 0.6045 0.08084 0.003458 29.8 3.98 0.170 33.9 0 0545 0.6045 0.08084 0.003458 31.8 4.25 0.182 36.2 0 0546 0.6045 0.08084 0.003458 31.8 4.25 0.182 36.2 0 0547/548 0.003287 0.001474 0.0001577 0.360 0.162 0.0173 0.539 1 2549 0.6395 0.08084 0.003458 27.5 3.47 0.148 31.1 0 1550 0.6045 0.08084 0.003458 25.9 3.47 0.148 29.6 0 0551/552 0.1412 0.0752 0.002629 14.0 7.46 0.261 21.7 1 2558 0.0001778 0.00399 0.002432 0.018 0.409 0.250 0.677 1 2559 0.2154 0.09692 0.003458 9.44 4.25 0.151 13.8 0 2560 0.6045 0.08084 0.003458 26.5 3.54 0.151 30.2 0 0561 0.6045 0.08084 0.003458 29.7 3.97 0.170 33.8 0 0562 0.6045 0.08084 0.003458 29.7 3.97 0.170 33.8 0 0563 0.6045 0.08084 0.003458 35.7 4.78 0.204 40.7 0 0566 0.004354 0.00417 0.02444 0.530 0.508 2.98 4.01 1 2567 0.0001714 0.01362 0.002432 0.020 1.55 0.277 1.85 1 2996 0.03888 0.02798 0.002432 4.19 3.01 0.262 7.47 1 0699 0.6045 0.08084 0.003458 20.6 2.75 0.118 23.5 0 0575 0.6045 0.08084 0.003458 14.5 1.94 0.0830 16.5 0 0576 0.6045 0.08084 0.003458 14.5 1.94 0.0830 16.5 0 0577/578 0.1275 0.07905 0.002441 16.5 10.2 0.315 27.0 1 2581 0.6045 0.08084 0.003458 20.9 2.80 0.120 23.8 0 0582 0.6045 0.08084 0.003458 20.9 2.80 0.120 23.8 0 0583 0.04519 0.04494 0.002441 3.62 3.60 0.196 7.42 1 2584 0.6045 0.08084 0.003458 32.5 4.34 0.186 37.0 0 0585 0.6045 0.08084 0.003458 32.5 4.34 0.186 37.0 0 0586 0.6045 0.08084 0.003458 32.5 4.34 0.186 37.0 0 0587 0.6045 0.08084 0.003458 22.1 2.96 0.126 25.2 0 0A-12Kiln IDEmission Factors from TestData (lb/ton)Average Emission Factors(lb/ton)Kiln Emissions (tpy)ControlCodeTestDataCodeHFHClCl2HFHClCl2HFHClCl2TotalHAP588 0.6045 0.08084 0.003458 22.1 2.96 0.126 25.2 0 0594 0.6045 0.08084 0.003458 4.05 0.542 0.0232 4.62 0 0595 0.6045 0.08084 0.003458 4.05 0.542 0.0232 4.62 0 0596 0.6045 0.08084 0.003458 23.8 3.19 0.136 27.2 0 0597 0.6045 0.08084 0.003458 23.8 3.19 0.136 27.2 0 0598 0.2357 0.08084 0.003458 9.15 3.14 0.134 12.4 0 1599 0.04606 0.009585 0.002432 1.24 0.259 0.0657 1.57 1 2590 0.6045 0.08084 0.003458 24.0 3.22 0.138 27.4 0 0605 0.04933 0.08224 0.002432 4.05 6.75 0.200 11.0 1 2606 0.1454 0.05536 0.0001111 11.9 4.55 0.00913 16.5 1 2612/613 0.005068 0.05941 0.002441 0.448 5.26 0.216 5.92 1 1614 0.1079 0.2017 0.002441 10.4 19.4 0.235 30.1 1 2615 0.6045 0.08084 0.003458 9.74 1.30 0.0557 11.1 0 0616 0.6045 0.08084 0.003458 9.74 1.30 0.0557 11.1 0 0617 0.03616 0.05941 0.002441 2.38 3.91 0.161 6.45 1 0618 0.6045 0.08084 0.003458 26.2 3.51 0.150 29.9 0 0619 0.6045 0.08084 0.003458 38.1 5.10 0.218 43.4 0 0622/623 0.08633 0.08084 0.003458 10.4 9.70 0.415 20.5 0 1624 0.03616 0.05941 0.002441 3.25 5.35 0.220 8.82 1 0625 0.003011 0.02776 0.002441 0.271 2.50 0.220 2.99 1 2626/627 0.03616 0.05941 0.002441 3.23 5.31 0.218 8.76 1 0635 0.6045 0.08084 0.003458 42.9 5.74 0.245 48.9 0 0636 0.6045 0.08084 0.003458 42.9 5.74 0.245 48.9 0 0637 0.6045 0.08084 0.003458 23.5 3.15 0.135 26.8 0 0638 0.6045 0.08084 0.003458 23.5 3.15 0.135 26.8 0 0639 0.6045 0.08084 0.003458 44.2 5.91 0.253 50.4 0 0644 0.008043 0.1204 0.002441 0.547 8.20 0.166 8.91 1 2645 0.01136 0.08594 0.002441 0.794 6.01 0.171 6.97 1 2A-13Kiln IDEmission Factors from TestData (lb/ton)Average Emission Factors(lb/ton)Kiln Emissions (tpy)ControlCodeTestDataCodeHFHClCl2HFHClCl2HFHClCl2TotalHAP642 0.6045 0.08084 0.003458 29.0 3.87 0.166 33.0 0 0648 0.6045 0.08084 0.003458 29.8 3.98 0.170 33.9 0 0649 0.04236 0.01659 0.002441 3.67 1.44 0.211 5.31 1 2650 0.5304 0.1577 0.003458 22.1 6.58 0.144 28.9 0 2671 0.6045 0.08084 0.003458 29.9 4.00 0.171 34.1 0 0672 0.6045 0.08084 0.003458 29.9 4.00 0.171 34.1 0 0673/674 0.0383 0.01529 0.002441 3.79 1.51 0.242 5.55 1 2652 0.6045 0.08084 0.003458 30.4 4.07 0.174 34.7 0 0653 0.001581 0.004446 0.0001515 0.085 0.238 0.00809 0.330 1 2656 0.6045 0.08084 0.003458 21.2 2.83 0.121 24.1 0 0662 0.002162 0.03491 0.002441 0.216 3.49 0.244 3.95 1 2667 0.6045 0.08084 0.003458 27.8 3.72 0.159 31.7 0 0668 0.6045 0.08084 0.003458 27.8 3.72 0.159 31.7 0 0669 0.7923 0.08084 0.003458 27.8 2.83 0.121 30.7 0 1677 0.6045 0.08084 0.003458 25.4 3.40 0.145 29.0 0 0679 0.002381 0.03804 0.002441 0.137 2.18 0.140 2.46 1 2680 0.00303 0.02956 0.002441 0.174 1.70 0.140 2.01 1 2589 0.6045 0.08084 0.003458 5.96 0.797 0.0341 6.79 0 0704/705/706/7070.4127 0.08084 0.003458 24.1 4.72 0.202 29.0 0 1689 0.6045 0.08084 0.003458 15.9 2.12 0.0909 18.1 0 0690 0.6045 0.08084 0.003458 9.91 1.33 0.0567 11.3 0 0703 0.6045 0.08084 0.003458 21.7 2.90 0.124 24.7 0 0693 0.6045 0.08084 0.003458 32.4 4.33 0.185 36.9 0 0694 0.5041 0.08084 0.003458 21.3 3.41 0.146 24.8 0 1695 0.5748 0.0109 0.003458 31.9 0.605 0.192 32.7 0 2696 0.003947 0.1005 0.002441 0.233 5.94 0.144 6.32 1 2701 0.6045 0.08084 0.003458 8.29 1.11 0.0474 9.45 0 0A-14Kiln IDEmission Factors from TestData (lb/ton)Average Emission Factors(lb/ton)Kiln Emissions (tpy)ControlCodeTestDataCodeHFHClCl2HFHClCl2HFHClCl2TotalHAP702 0.6045 0.08084 0.003458 31.8 4.25 0.182 36.2 0 0592 0.6045 0.08084 0.003458 9.43 1.26 0.0539 10.7 0 0593 0.6045 0.08084 0.003458 9.43 1.26 0.0539 10.7 0 0178 0.7925 0.02329 0.003458 6.07 0.179 0.0265 6.28 0 2179 0.3862 0.02031 0.003458 3.35 0.176 0.0300 3.56 0 2180 0.4491 0.02326 0.003458 3.89 0.202 0.0300 4.13 0 2709 0.6045 0.08084 0.003458 25.4 3.40 0.145 29.0 0 0710 1.068 0.08084 0.003458 35.2 2.66 0.114 38.0 0 1711 0.6045 0.08084 0.003458 22.3 2.99 0.128 25.5 0 0712 0.6045 0.08084 0.003458 17.9 2.40 0.103 20.4 0 0713 0.6045 0.08084 0.003458 12.3 1.65 0.0704 14.0 0 0714 0.6045 0.08084 0.003458 6.80 0.910 0.0389 7.75 0 0715 0.6045 0.08084 0.003458 6.80 0.910 0.0389 7.75 0 0716 0.6045 0.08084 0.003458 13.6 1.82 0.0779 15.5 0 0727/728 0.6045 0.08084 0.003458 50.5 6.76 0.289 57.6 0 0729/730 0.02108 0.01165 0.002441 2.46 1.36 0.284 4.10 1 2731/732 0.4038 0.09573 0.003458 34.0 8.05 0.291 42.3 0 2735 0.6045 0.08084 0.003458 8.90 1.19 0.0509 10.1 0 0742 0.6045 0.08084 0.003458 12.2 1.64 0.0700 13.9 0 0743 0.6045 0.08084 0.003458 12.2 1.64 0.0700 13.9 0 0747 0.03616 0.05941 0.002441 2.07 3.41 0.140 5.62 1 0748 0.03888 0.02798 0.002432 2.79 2.01 0.174 4.97 1 0749 0.03616 0.05941 0.002441 1.81 2.98 0.122 4.92 1 0753 0.2944 0.08084 0.003458 14.2 3.89 0.167 18.2 0 1754 0.6045 0.08084 0.003458 24.8 3.31 0.142 28.2 0 0758 0.6045 0.08084 0.003458 17.9 2.39 0.102 20.4 0 0759 0.6045 0.08084 0.003458 2.94 0.393 0.0168 3.35 0 0760 0.6045 0.08084 0.003458 3.28 0.439 0.0188 3.74 0 0A-15Kiln IDEmission Factors from TestData (lb/ton)Average Emission Factors(lb/ton)Kiln Emissions (tpy)ControlCodeTestDataCodeHFHClCl2HFHClCl2HFHClCl2TotalHAP761 0.6045 0.08084 0.003458 2.94 0.393 0.0168 3.35 0 0762 0.6045 0.08084 0.003458 2.94 0.393 0.0168 3.35 0 0766/767 0.008777 0.01987 0.002441 0.911 2.06 0.253 3.23 1 2768 0.004627 0.01136 0.002441 0.501 1.23 0.264 1.99 1 2769 0.005255 0.02585 0.002441 0.460 2.26 0.214 2.94 1 2770 0.005066 0.0228 0.002441 0.444 2.00 0.214 2.65 1 2773 0.6045 0.08084 0.003458 21.1 2.83 0.121 24.1 0 0774 0.03888 0.02798 0.002432 1.70 1.23 0.107 3.03 1 0775 0.1319 0.00959 0.0003769 6.87 0.500 0.0196 7.39 0 2776 0.6045 0.08084 0.003458 18.0 2.41 0.103 20.5 0 0777 0.6045 0.08084 0.003458 13.0 1.73 0.0742 14.8 0 0A-16Table A-3. Facility Status Based on Current Emissions EstimatesFacilityIDCompany NameFacility NameCityStateFacility Emissions (tpy)CurrentStatusHFHClCl2TotalHAPACME-3 Acme Brick Company Acme- Bennett Tunnel Plant (BTP) Millsap TX 0.138 0.254 0.170 0.562 SyntheticAreaACME-8 Acme Brick Company Acme- Elgin Plant(ELP/ENP) Elgin TX 28.0 13.0 0.154 41.2 MajorACME-9 Acme Brick Company Acme- Eureka Plant (EBP) Clarksville AR 41.2 4.24 0.181 45.6 MajorACME-12 Acme Brick Company Acme- Holly Springs Plant (HSP) Holly Springs MS 22.4 2.99 0.128 25.5 MajorACME-14 Acme Brick Company Acme- Kanapolis Plant (KAP) Kanopolis KS 15.3 2.05 0.0875 17.4 MajorACME-1 Acme Brick Company Acme- Ochs Brick Plant (AOP) Springfield MN 33.1 4.43 0.189 37.7 MajorACME-18 Acme Brick Company Acme- Perla Plant(PEP/PWP) Malvern AR 30.8 5.23 0.265 36.3 MajorACME-20 Acme Brick Company Acme- Texas Clay Plant (TCP) Malakoff TX 27.6 12.4 0.264 40.3 MajorACME-21 Acme Brick Company Acme- Tulsa Plant (TUP) Tulsa OK 49.1 11.2 0.129 60.4 MajorACME-23 Acme Brick Company Acme- Wheeler Plant (WTP) Jonesboro AR 18.6 2.48 0.106 21.1 Major35 Acme Brick Company Jenkins- Coosaada Plant Coosaada AL 50.3 6.73 0.288 57.3 Major2 American Eagle Brick Co American Eagle Brick Co Sunland Park NM 9.00 1.20 0.0515 10.3 MajorBELD-1 Belden Brick Company Belden- Plant #2Sugarcreek Sugarcreek OH 152 27.0 3.46 183 MajorBELD-2 Belden Brick Company Belden- Plant 1 Strasburg Strasburg OH 8.15 1.09 0.0467 9.29 MajorBORA-1 Boral Bricks Inc. Boral- Atlanta Plant Smyrna GA 13.8 0.927 0.319 15.1 MajorBORA-2 Boral Bricks Inc. Boral- Augusta Plant 6 Augusta GA 43.2 7.97 0.341 51.5 MajorBORA-4 Boral Bricks Inc. Boral- Bessemer Plant #5 Bessemer AL 63.5 8.50 0.364 72.4 MajorBORA-5 Boral Bricks Inc. Boral- Bessemer Plant #6 Bessemer AL 0.360 0.162 0.0173 0.539 SyntheticAreaBORA-6 Boral Bricks Inc. Boral- Gleason Plant Gleason TN 53.4 6.94 0.297 60.6 MajorBORA-7 Boral Bricks Inc. Boral- Henderson Facility Henderson TX 14.0 7.46 0.261 21.7 MajorBORA-13 Boral Bricks Inc. Boral- Muskogee Plant Muskogee OK 0.018 0.409 0.250 0.677 SyntheticAreaBORA-14 Boral Bricks Inc. Boral- Phenix City-Plant 3 Phenix City AL 35.9 7.79 0.303 44.0 MajorBORA-15 Boral Bricks Inc. Boral- Phenix City-Plant 4 Phenix City AL 95.0 12.7 0.544 108 MajorBORA-17 Boral Bricks Inc. Boral- Salisbury Plant Salisbury NC 0.530 0.508 2.98 4.01 SyntheticAreaA-17FacilityIDCompany NameFacility NameCityStateFacility Emissions (tpy)CurrentStatusHFHClCl2TotalHAPBORA-18 Boral Bricks Inc. Boral- Terre Haute Plant Terre Haute IN 0.020 1.55 0.277 1.85 SyntheticAreaBram Brampton Brick Ltd. Brampton Brick, Inc. Farmersburg IN 4.19 3.01 0.262 7.47 SyntheticArea181 Certainteed Corporation Certainteed Corporation- Ludowici New Lexington OH 20.6 2.75 0.118 23.5 Major19 Cherokee Brick & Tile Co Cherokee Brick& Tile Macon GA 45.5 14.1 0.481 60.1 Major34 Columbus Brick Co Columbus Brick Company Columbus MS 45.5 9.20 0.435 55.1 Major134 Commercial Brick Corp Commercial Brick Corp Wewoka OK 97.4 13.0 0.557 111 Major64 Continental Brick Co Continental Brick- Martinsburg Martinsburg WV 44.2 5.91 0.253 50.4 Major153 Elgin-Butler Brick Co Elgin Butler Plant Elgin TX 8.10 1.08 0.0463 9.23 Major23 Endicott Clay Products Co Endicott Clay Products Fairbury NE 56.8 9.51 0.407 66.7 Major158 General Finance, Inc General Finance- Cloud Ceramics Concordia KS 1.24 0.259 0.0657 1.57 SyntheticArea83 General Shale Brick, Inc Cunningham- Cleveland Co Grover NC 24.0 3.22 0.138 27.4 MajorGENE-5 General Shale Brick, Inc General ShaleBrick-Plant 40 Coosa GA 16.0 11.3 0.209 27.5 MajorGENE-8 General Shale Brick, Inc General Shale Brick-Plants 35 & 36 Blue Ridge(Roanoke)VA 10.8 24.7 0.451 36.0 MajorGENE-9 General Shale Brick, Inc General Shale Brick-Plants 6 & 28 Atkins(Marion)VA 21.9 6.51 0.272 28.7 MajorGENE-15 General Shale Brick, Inc General Shale-Corbin-Plant 33 Woodbine KY 64.3 8.60 0.368 73.3 MajorGENE-11 General Shale Brick, Inc General Shale- Moncure Facility Moncure NC 13.9 17.5 0.854 32.3 MajorGENE-12 General Shale Brick, Inc General Shale Robinson Brick Co.-Plant 2Denver CO 3.23 5.31 0.218 8.76 SyntheticAreaGLEN-1 Glen Gery Glen-Gery Corporation- Bigler Bigler PA 85.8 11.5 0.491 97.7 MajorGLEN-2 Glen Gery Glen-Gery Corporation- Caledonia Caledonia OH 47.1 6.30 0.269 53.6 MajorGLEN-3 Glen Gery Glen-Gery Corporation- Capitol Manassas VA 44.2 5.91 0.253 50.4 MajorGLEN-8 Glen Gery Glen-Gery Corporation- Marseilles Marseilles IL 1.34 14.2 0.337 15.9 MajorGLEN-5 Glen Gery Glen-Gery Corporation- Redfield Redfield IA 29.0 3.87 0.166 33.0 MajorGLEN-10 Glen Gery Glen-Gery Corporation- York York PA 33.4 5.42 0.382 39.2 MajorHANS2 Hanson Brick East, LLC Hanson- Athens Athens TX 22.1 6.58 0.144 28.9 MajorA-18FacilityIDCompany NameFacility NameCityStateFacility Emissions (tpy)CurrentStatusHFHClCl2TotalHAPHANS13 Hanson Brick East, LLC Hanson- Columbia - Plant 2 Columbia SC 59.8 8.00 0.342 68.2 MajorHANS14 Hanson Brick East, LLC Hanson- Columbia - Plant 4 Columbia SC 3.79 1.51 0.242 5.55 SyntheticAreaHANS5 Hanson Brick East, LLC Hanson- Elgin Elgin TX 30.5 4.31 0.182 35.0 MajorHANS7 Hanson Brick East, LLC Hanson- Mineral Wells East Mineral Wells TX 21.2 2.83 0.121 24.1 MajorHANS8 Hanson Brick East, LLC Hanson- Monroe Monroe NC 0.216 3.49 0.244 3.95 SyntheticAreaHANS11 Hanson Brick East, LLC Hanson- Roseboro Roseboro NC 55.6 7.44 0.318 63.4 MajorHANS12 Hanson Brick East, LLC Hanson- Stanton Stanton KY 27.8 2.83 0.121 30.7 Major145 Hebron Brick Company Hebron Brick Plant Hebron ND 25.4 3.40 0.145 29.0 Major78 Henry Brick Company, Inc Henry Brick Selma AL 0.310 3.88 0.280 4.47 SyntheticArea178NR International Chimney Corp Continental Clay- Kittanning Kittanning PA 5.96 0.797 0.0341 6.79 SyntheticArea184 Ironrock Capital (formerlyMetropolitan Ceramics,Inc.)Ironrock Capital (formerlyMetropolitan Ceramics, Inc.)Canton OH 24.1 4.72 0.202 29.0 Major175NR Kansas Brick and Tile Co Kansas Brick and Tile Hoisington KS 15.9 2.12 0.0909 18.1 Major104 Kasten Clay Products Co Kasten Clay Products Jackson MO 9.91 1.33 0.0567 11.3 Major139 L.P. McNear Brick Co, Inc McNear Brickyard San Rafael CA 21.7 2.90 0.124 24.7 Major135 Lee Brick and Tile Co Lee Brick Sanford Facility Sanford NC 85.8 14.3 0.668 101 Major50 Marion Ceramics, Inc Marion Ceramics Pee Dee SC 8.29 1.11 0.0474 9.45 Major42 McAvoy Brick Co McAvoy Brick Phoenixville PA 31.8 4.25 0.182 36.2 MajorMOHA-4 Mohawk Industries Dal-Tile, Fayette, Alabama Fayette AL 18.9 2.52 0.108 21.5 MajorMOHA-6 Mohawk Industries Dal-Tile, Lewisport, Kentucky Lewisport KY 13.3 0.556 0.0865 14.0 Major87 Mutual Materials Co Mutual Materials- Mica Mica WA 25.4 3.40 0.145 29.0 Major88 Mutual Materials Co Mutual Materials- Newcastle Renton WA 35.2 2.66 0.114 38.0 Major68 Old Virginia Brick Co Old Virginia- Madison Heights MadisonHeightsVA 22.3 2.99 0.128 25.5 Major69 Old Virginia Brick Co Old Virginia- Salem Salem VA 30.2 4.04 0.173 34.5 MajorA-19FacilityIDCompany NameFacility NameCityStateFacility Emissions (tpy)CurrentStatusHFHClCl2TotalHAP176NR Pacific Clay Products Pacific Clay Products- LakeElsinoreLake Elsinore CA 27.2 3.64 0.156 31.0 Major137 Pine Hall Brick Co, Inc Pine Hall- Madison Plant Madison NC 86.9 16.2 0.864 104 Major159 Ragland Clay Products,LLCRagland Clay Products Ragland AL 8.90 1.19 0.0509 10.1 Major45 Richards Brick Co Richards Brick Edwardsville IL 24.5 3.27 0.140 27.9 Major90 Sioux City Brick and TileCoSioux City- Adel Plant Adel IA 4.86 5.41 0.314 10.6 SyntheticArea140 Sioux City Brick and TileCoSioux City- Sergeant Bluff Plant Sergeant Bluff IA 1.81 2.98 0.122 4.92 SyntheticArea46 Statesville Brick Co Statesville Brick Statesville NC 38.9 7.21 0.308 46.5 Major116 Summit Pressed Brick andTile CoSummit- Brick Plant and StorageYardPueblo CO 17.9 2.39 0.102 20.4 Major186 Summitville Tiles, Inc. Summitville Tiles, Inc.- MinervaPlantMinerva OH 12.1 1.62 0.0692 13.8 Major49 Triangle Brick Triangle Brick- Merry Oaks Plant Moncure NC 1.41 3.29 0.517 5.22 SyntheticAreaTriWade Triangle Brick Triangle Brick- Wadesboro Plant Wadesboro NC 0.904 4.26 0.428 5.59 SyntheticArea124 Watsontown Brick Co Watsontown Brick Watsontown PA 22.8 4.05 0.227 27.1 MajorWhit Whitacre Greer Whitacre Greer Alliance OH 24.9 2.91 0.123 27.9 Major147 Yankee Hill Brick and Tile Yankee Hill Brick and Tile Lincoln NE 13.0 1.73 0.0742 14.8 MajorA-20Table A-4. Potential Kiln Control and Estimated EmissionsKiln IDCurrent APCDPotential Action to beSynthetic AreaAPCD SizeKiln Emissions with Potential Control (tpy)HFHClCl2Total HAP502 DLS/FF None LCD 0.138 0.254 0.170 0.562507 None Install DLA LCD 1.32 2.48 0.106 3.91508 DIFF None LCD 1.50 9.48 0.00230 11.0509 None Install DLA SCD 0.528 0.989 0.0423 1.56510 None Install DLA SCD 1.00 0.989 0.0423 2.03511 None Install DLA SCD 0.528 0.989 0.0423 1.56512 None Install DLA SCD 1.12 2.09 0.0896 3.30513 None Install DLA SCD 0.765 1.43 0.0613 2.26500 None Install DLA SCD 0.827 1.55 0.0663 2.44501 None Install DLA SCD 0.827 1.55 0.0663 2.44515 None Install DLA SCD 1.28 1.72 0.102 3.10516 None Install DLA SCD 0.259 1.95 0.0833 2.29518 DLA None LCD 0.622 8.77 0.109 9.51519/520 None Install DLA LCD 1.35 2.53 0.108 3.99521 None Install DLA SCD 2.45 7.82 0.0902 10.4522 None Install DLA SCD 0.928 1.74 0.0743 2.74684 None Install DLA SCD 1.26 2.35 0.101 3.71685 None Install DLA SCD 1.26 2.35 0.101 3.71523 None Install DLA SCD 0.450 0.843 0.0360 1.33526 DIFF None LCD 1.97 1.37 0.316 3.66527 DIFF None LCD 4.64 0.737 0.0280 5.41528/529/530 None Install DLA LCD 2.03 1.47 0.169 3.67531/532/533 SD/ESP None LCD 89.7 21.9 2.78 114534/535 None Install DLA SCD 0.763 0.656 0.0647 1.48536 None Install DLA SCD 0.408 0.763 0.0327 1.20537/538 DIFF None LCD 13.8 0.927 0.319 15.1539 None Install DLA LCD 0.670 2.79 0.119 3.58540 None Install DLA LCD 1.49 2.79 0.119 4.40A-21Kiln IDCurrent APCDPotential Action to beSynthetic AreaAPCD SizeKiln Emissions with Potential Control (tpy)HFHClCl2Total HAP545 None Install DLA LCD 1.59 2.97 0.127 4.69546 None Install DLA LCD 1.59 2.97 0.127 4.69547/548 DIFF None LCD 0.360 0.162 0.0173 0.539549 None Install DLA SCD 1.37 2.43 0.104 3.91550 None Install DLA SCD 1.30 2.43 0.104 3.83551/552 DLA None LCD 14.0 7.46 0.261 21.7558 DIFF None LCD 0.0182 0.409 0.250 0.677559 None Install DLA LCD 0.472 2.97 0.106 3.55560 None Install DLA LCD 1.32 2.48 0.106 3.91561 None Install DLA LCD 1.48 2.78 0.119 4.38562 None Install DLA LCD 1.48 2.78 0.119 4.38563 None Install DLA LCD 1.79 3.35 0.143 5.28566 DIFF None LCD 0.530 0.508 2.98 4.01567 DIFF None LCD 0.0195 1.55 0.277 1.85996 DIFF None LCD 4.19 3.01 0.262 7.47699 None Install DLA SCD 1.03 1.93 0.0825 3.04575 None Install DLA SCD 0.725 1.36 0.0581 2.14576 None Install DLA SCD 0.725 1.36 0.0581 2.14577/578 DLA None LCD 16.5 10.2 0.315 27.0581 None Install DLA SCD 1.05 1.96 0.0838 3.09582 None Install DLA SCD 1.05 1.96 0.0838 3.09583 DLA None LCD 3.62 3.60 0.196 7.42584 None Install DLA LCD 1.62 3.04 0.130 4.79585 None Install DLA LCD 1.62 3.04 0.130 4.79586 None Install DLA LCD 1.62 3.04 0.130 4.79587 None Install DLA SCD 1.11 2.07 0.0885 3.26588 None Install DLA SCD 1.11 2.07 0.0885 3.26594 None Install DLA SCD 0.203 0.379 0.0162 0.598595 None None SCD 4.05 0.542 0.0232 4.62A-22Kiln IDCurrent APCDPotential Action to beSynthetic AreaAPCD SizeKiln Emissions with Potential Control (tpy)HFHClCl2Total HAP596 None Install DLA SCD 1.19 2.23 0.0954 3.52597 None Install DLA SCD 1.19 2.23 0.0954 3.52598 None Install DLA SCD 0.457 2.20 0.0939 2.75599 DIFF None SCD 1.24 0.259 0.0657 1.57590 None Install DLA SCD 1.20 2.25 0.0963 3.55605 DIFF None LCD 4.05 6.75 0.200 11.0606 DIFF None LCD 11.9 4.55 0.00913 16.5612/613 DLA None LCD 0.448 5.26 0.216 5.92614 DLA None LCD 10.4 19.4 0.235 30.1615 None Install DLA SCD 0.487 0.912 0.0390 1.44616 None Install DLA SCD 0.487 0.912 0.0390 1.44617 DLA None LCD 2.38 3.91 0.161 6.45618 None Install DLA SCD 1.31 2.45 0.105 3.87619 None Install DLA LCD 1.91 3.57 0.153 5.63622/623 None Install DLA LCD 0.518 6.79 0.291 7.60624 DLA None LCD 3.25 5.35 0.220 8.82625 DLA None LCD 0.271 2.50 0.220 2.99626/627 DLA None LCD 3.23 5.31 0.218 8.76635 None Install DLA LCD 2.14 4.02 0.172 6.33636 None Install DLA LCD 2.14 4.02 0.172 6.33637 None Install DLA SCD 1.18 2.20 0.0943 3.47638 None Install DLA SCD 1.18 2.20 0.0943 3.47639 None Install DLA LCD 2.21 4.14 0.177 6.53644 DLA None LCD 0.547 8.20 0.166 8.91645 DLA None LCD 0.794 6.01 0.171 6.97642 None Install DLA LCD 1.45 2.71 0.116 4.28648 None Install DLA LCD 1.49 2.79 0.119 4.39649 DLA None LCD 3.67 1.44 0.211 5.31650 None Install DLA SCD 1.11 4.61 0.101 5.82A-23Kiln IDCurrent APCDPotential Action to beSynthetic AreaAPCD SizeKiln Emissions with Potential Control (tpy)HFHClCl2Total HAP671 None Install DLA LCD 1.50 2.80 0.120 4.42672 None Install DLA LCD 1.50 2.80 0.120 4.42673/674 DLA None LCD 3.79 1.51 0.242 5.55652 None Install DLA LCD 1.52 2.85 0.122 4.49653 DLS/FF None LCD 0.0845 0.238 0.00809 0.33656 None Install DLA SCD 1.06 1.98 0.0847 3.12662 DLA None LCD 0.216 3.49 0.244 3.95667 None Install DLA LCD 1.39 2.60 0.111 4.10668 None Install DLA LCD 1.39 2.60 0.111 4.10669 None Install DLA SCD 1.39 1.98 0.0848 3.46677 None Install DLA SCD 1.27 2.38 0.102 3.75679 DLA None LCD 0.137 2.18 0.140 2.46680 DLA None LCD 0.174 1.70 0.140 2.01589 None None SCD 5.96 0.797 0.0341 6.79704/705/706/707 None Install DLA LCD 1.20 3.30 0.141 4.65689 None Install DLA SCD 0.794 1.49 0.0636 2.35690 None Install DLA SCD 0.495 0.928 0.0397 1.46703 None Install DLA SCD 1.09 2.03 0.0869 3.20693 None Install DLA LCD 1.62 3.03 0.130 4.78694 None Install DLA SCD 1.06 2.39 0.102 3.56695 None Install DLA LCD 1.59 0.423 0.134 2.15696 DLA None LCD 0.233 5.94 0.144 6.32701 None Install DLA SCD 0.415 0.776 0.0332 1.22702 None Install DLA LCD 1.59 2.97 0.127 4.69592 None Install DLA SCD 0.471 0.882 0.0377 1.39593 None Install DLA SCD 0.471 0.882 0.0377 1.39178 None Install DLA SCD 0.304 0.125 0.0186 0.447179 None None SCD 3.35 0.176 0.0300 3.56180 None None SCD 3.89 0.202 0.0300 4.13A-24Kiln IDCurrent APCDPotential Action to beSynthetic AreaAPCD SizeKiln Emissions with Potential Control (tpy)HFHClCl2Total HAP709 None Install DLA SCD 1.27 2.38 0.102 3.75710 None Install DLA SCD 1.76 1.86 0.0798 3.70711 None Install DLA SCD 1.12 2.09 0.0895 3.30712 None Install DLA SCD 0.896 1.68 0.0718 2.65713 None Install DLA SCD 0.616 1.15 0.0493 1.82714 None Install DLA SCD 0.340 0.637 0.0272 1.00715 None Install DLA SCD 0.340 0.637 0.0272 1.00716 None Install DLA SCD 0.680 1.27 0.0545 2.01727/728 None Install DLA LCD 2.53 4.73 0.202 7.46729/730 DLA None LCD 2.46 1.36 0.284 4.10731/732 None Install DLA LCD 1.70 5.64 0.204 7.54735 None Install DLA SCD 0.445 0.833 0.0356 1.31742 None Install DLA SCD 0.612 1.15 0.0490 1.81743 None Install DLA SCD 0.612 1.15 0.0490 1.81747 DLA None LCD 2.07 3.41 0.140 5.62748 DIFF None LCD 2.79 2.01 0.174 4.97749 DLA None LCD 1.81 2.98 0.122 4.92753 None Install DLA LCD 0.709 2.73 0.117 3.55754 None Install DLA SCD 1.24 2.32 0.0991 3.65758 None Install DLA SCD 0.894 1.67 0.0716 2.64759 None None SCD 2.94 0.393 0.0168 3.35760 None Install DLA SCD 0.164 0.307 0.0131 0.485761 None Install DLA SCD 0.147 0.275 0.0118 0.434762 None Install DLA SCD 0.147 0.275 0.0118 0.434766/767 DLA None LCD 0.911 2.06 0.253 3.23768 DLA None LCD 0.501 1.23 0.264 1.99769 DLA None LCD 0.460 2.26 0.214 2.94770 DLA None LCD 0.444 2.00 0.214 2.65773 None Install DLA SCD 1.06 1.98 0.0847 3.12A-25Kiln IDCurrent APCDPotential Action to beSynthetic AreaAPCD SizeKiln Emissions with Potential Control (tpy)HFHClCl2Total HAP774 DIFF None LCD 1.70 1.23 0.107 3.03775 None Install DLA LCD 0.344 0.350 0.0138 0.707776 None Install DLA SCD 0.900 1.69 0.0721 2.66777 None Install DLA SCD 0.648 1.21 0.0519 1.91A-26Table A-5. Potential Facility Status and Cost Based on Emissions Testing and Installation of DLAFacilityIDCompany NameFacility NameCurrentStatusFacility Emissions withPotential Control (tpy)Status WithPotentialControlCapitalCostAnnualCostHFHClCl2TotalHAPACME-3 Acme Brick Company Acme- Bennett TunnelPlant (BTP)SyntheticArea0.138 0.254 0.170 0.562 Synthetic Area $19,000 $4,600ACME-8 Acme Brick Company Acme- Elgin Plant(ELP/ENP)Major 2.83 12.0 0.108 14.9 Major $0 $0ACME-9 Acme Brick Company Acme- Eureka Plant(EBP)Major 2.06 2.97 0.127 5.15 Synthetic Area $3,329,418 $1,085,468ACME-12 Acme Brick Company Acme- Holly SpringsPlant (HSP)Major 1.12 2.09 0.0896 3.30 Synthetic Area $1,115,473 $363,156ACME-14 Acme Brick Company Acme- KanapolisPlant (KAP)Major 0.765 1.43 0.0613 2.26 Synthetic Area $1,115,473 $363,156ACME-1 Acme Brick Company Acme- Ochs BrickPlant (AOP)Major 1.65 3.10 0.133 4.89 Synthetic Area $2,221,945 $724,212ACME-18 Acme Brick Company Acme- Perla Plant(PEP/PWP)Major 1.54 3.66 0.186 5.39 Synthetic Area $2,221,945 $724,212ACME-20 Acme Brick Company Acme- Texas ClayPlant (TCP)Major 1.97 11.3 0.217 13.5 Major $0 $0ACME-21 Acme Brick Company Acme- Tulsa Plant(TUP)Major 2.45 7.82 0.0902 10.4 Synthetic Area $1,115,473 $363,156ACME-23 Acme Brick Company Acme- Wheeler Plant(WTP)Major 0.928 1.74 0.0743 2.74 Synthetic Area $1,115,473 $363,15635 Acme Brick Company Jenkins- CoosaadaPlantMajor 2.52 4.71 0.201 7.43 Synthetic Area $2,221,945 $724,2122 American Eagle BrickCoAmerican Eagle BrickCoMajor 0.450 0.843 0.0360 1.33 Synthetic Area $1,115,473 $363,156BELD-1 Belden BrickCompanyBelden- Plant #2SugarcreekMajor 99.1 26.1 3.36 129 Major $0 $0BELD-2 Belden BrickCompanyBelden- Plant 1StrasburgMajor 0.408 0.763 0.0327 1.20 Synthetic Area $1,115,473 $363,156BORA-1 Boral Bricks Inc. Boral- Atlanta Plant Major 13.8 0.927 0.319 15.1 Major $0 $0A-27FacilityIDCompany NameFacility NameCurrentStatusFacility Emissions withPotential Control (tpy)Status WithPotentialControlCapitalCostAnnualCostHFHClCl2TotalHAPBORA-2 Boral Bricks Inc. Boral- Augusta Plant 6 Major 2.16 5.58 0.239 7.97 Synthetic Area $3,008,095 $926,873BORA-4 Boral Bricks Inc. Boral- Bessemer Plant#5Major 3.18 5.95 0.254 9.38 Major $0 $0BORA-5 Boral Bricks Inc. Boral- Bessemer Plant#6SyntheticArea0.360 0.162 0.0173 0.539 Synthetic Area $19,000 $4,600BORA-6 Boral Bricks Inc. Boral- Gleason Plant Major 2.67 4.86 0.208 7.74 Synthetic Area $2,221,945 $724,212BORA-7 Boral Bricks Inc. Boral- HendersonFacilityMajor 14.0 7.46 0.261 21.7 Major $0 $0BORA-13 Boral Bricks Inc. Boral- MuskogeePlantSyntheticArea0.0182 0.409 0.250 0.677 Synthetic Area $19,000 $4,600BORA-14 Boral Bricks Inc. Boral- Phenix CityPlant 3Major 1.80 5.45 0.212 7.46 Synthetic Area $3,008,095 $926,873BORA-15 Boral Bricks Inc. Boral- Phenix CityPlant 4Major 4.75 8.90 0.381 14.0 Major $0 $0BORA-17 Boral Bricks Inc. Boral- Salisbury Plant SyntheticArea0.530 0.508 2.98 4.01 Synthetic Area $19,000 $4,600BORA-18 Boral Bricks Inc. Boral- Terre HautePlantSyntheticArea0.0195 1.55 0.277 1.85 Synthetic Area $19,000 $4,600Bram Brampton Brick Ltd. Brampton Brick, Inc. SyntheticArea4.19 3.01 0.262 7.47 Synthetic Area $19,000 $4,600181 CertainteedCorporationCertainteedCorporation- LudowiciMajor 1.03 1.93 0.0825 3.04 Synthetic Area $1,115,473 $363,15619 Cherokee Brick & TileCoCherokee Brick & Tile Major 17.9 12.9 0.431 31.3 Major $0 $034 Columbus Brick Co Columbus BrickCompanyMajor 5.71 7.52 0.363 13.6 Major $0 $0134 Commercial BrickCorpCommercial BrickCorpMajor 4.87 9.12 0.390 14.4 Major $0 $064 Continental Brick Co Continental BrickMartinsburgMajor 2.21 4.14 0.177 6.53 Synthetic Area $2,221,945 $724,212153 Elgin-Butler Brick Co Elgin Butler Plant Major 4.25 0.921 0.0394 5.21 Synthetic Area $1,125,473 $365,656A-28FacilityIDCompany NameFacility NameCurrentStatusFacility Emissions withPotential Control (tpy)Status WithPotentialControlCapitalCostAnnualCostHFHClCl2TotalHAP23 Endicott ClayProducts CoEndicott ClayProductsMajor 2.84 6.66 0.285 9.78 Major $0 $0158 General Finance, Inc General FinanceCloud CeramicsSyntheticArea1.24 0.259 0.0657 1.57 Synthetic Area $19,000 $4,60083 General Shale Brick,IncCunninghamCleveland CoMajor 1.20 2.25 0.0963 3.55 Synthetic Area $1,115,473 $363,156GENE-5 General Shale Brick,IncGeneral Shale BrickPlant 40Major 16.0 11.3 0.209 27.5 Major $0 $0GENE-8 General Shale Brick,IncGeneral Shale BrickPlants 35 & 36Major 10.8 24.7 0.451 36.0 Major $0 $0GENE-9 General Shale Brick,IncGeneral Shale BrickPlants 6 & 28Major 3.35 5.73 0.239 9.32 Major $0 $0GENE-15 General Shale Brick,IncGeneral ShaleCorbin-Plant 33Major 3.22 6.02 0.258 9.50 Major $0 $0GENE-11 General Shale Brick,IncGeneral ShaleMoncure FacilityMajor 4.04 14.6 0.730 19.4 Major $0 $0GENE-12 General Shale Brick,IncGeneral ShaleRobinson Brick Co.-Plant 2SyntheticArea3.23 5.31 0.218 8.76 Synthetic Area $19,000 $4,600GLEN-1 Glen Gery Glen-GeryCorporation- BiglerMajor 4.29 8.03 0.344 12.7 Major $0 $0GLEN-2 Glen Gery Glen-GeryCorporationCaledoniaMajor 2.35 4.41 0.189 6.95 Synthetic Area $2,221,945 $724,212GLEN-3 Glen Gery Glen-GeryCorporation- CapitolMajor 2.21 4.14 0.177 6.53 Synthetic Area $1,508,548 $464,486GLEN-8 Glen Gery Glen-GeryCorporationMarseillesMajor 1.34 14.2 0.337 15.9 Major $0 $0GLEN-5 Glen Gery Glen-GeryCorporation- RedfieldMajor 1.45 2.71 0.116 4.28 Synthetic Area $1,508,548 $464,486A-29FacilityIDCompany NameFacility NameCurrentStatusFacility Emissions withPotential Control (tpy)Status WithPotentialControlCapitalCostAnnualCostHFHClCl2TotalHAPGLEN-10 Glen Gery Glen-GeryCorporation- YorkMajor 5.15 4.22 0.330 9.71 Synthetic Area $1,518,548 $466,986HANS2 Hanson Brick East,LLCHanson- Athens Major 1.11 4.61 0.101 5.82 Synthetic Area $1,115,473 $363,156HANS13 Hanson Brick East,LLCHanson- Columbia -Plant 2Major 2.99 5.60 0.240 8.83 Major $0 $0HANS14 Hanson Brick East,LLCHanson- Columbia -Plant 4SyntheticArea3.79 1.51 0.242 5.55 Synthetic Area $19,000 $4,600HANS5 Hanson Brick East,LLCHanson- Elgin Major 1.61 3.09 0.130 4.82 Synthetic Area $1,518,548 $466,986HANS7 Hanson Brick East,LLCHanson- Mineral WellsEastMajor 1.06 1.98 0.0847 3.12 Synthetic Area $1,115,473 $363,156HANS8 Hanson Brick East,LLCHanson- Monroe SyntheticArea0.216 3.49 0.244 3.95 Synthetic Area $19,000 $4,600HANS11 Hanson Brick East,LLCHanson- Roseboro Major 2.78 5.21 0.223 8.21 Major $0 $0HANS12 Hanson Brick East,LLCHanson- Stanton Major 1.39 1.98 0.0848 3.46 Synthetic Area $1,115,473 $363,156145 Hebron BrickCompanyHebron Brick Plant Major 1.27 2.38 0.102 3.75 Synthetic Area $1,115,473 $363,15678 Henry BrickCompany, IncHenry Brick SyntheticArea0.310 3.88 0.280 4.47 Synthetic Area $29,000 $7,100178NR InternationalChimney CorpContinental ClayKittanningSyntheticArea5.96 0.797 0.0341 6.79 Synthetic Area $19,000 $4,600184 Ironrock Capital(formerlyMetropolitanCeramics, Inc.)Ironrock Capital(formerly MetropolitanCeramics, Inc.)Major 1.20 3.30 0.141 4.65 Synthetic Area $1,508,548 $464,486175NR Kansas Brick and TileCoKansas Brick and Tile Major 0.794 1.49 0.0636 2.35 Synthetic Area $1,115,473 $363,156104 Kasten Clay ProductsCoKasten Clay Products Major 0.495 0.928 0.0397 1.46 Synthetic Area $1,115,473 $363,156A-30FacilityIDCompany NameFacility NameCurrentStatusFacility Emissions withPotential Control (tpy)Status WithPotentialControlCapitalCostAnnualCostHFHClCl2TotalHAP139 L.P. McNear BrickCo, IncMcNear Brickyard Major 1.09 2.03 0.0869 3.20 Synthetic Area $1,115,473 $363,156135 Lee Brick and Tile Co Lee Brick SanfordFacilityMajor 4.51 11.8 0.511 16.8 Major $0 $050 Marion Ceramics, Inc Marion Ceramics Major 0.415 0.776 0.0332 1.22 Synthetic Area $1,115,473 $363,15642 McAvoy Brick Co McAvoy Brick Major 1.59 2.97 0.127 4.69 Synthetic Area $1,508,548 $464,486MOHA-4 Mohawk Industries Dal-Tile, Fayette,AlabamaMajor 0.943 1.76 0.0755 2.78 Synthetic Area $2,221,945 $724,212MOHA-6 Mohawk Industries Dal-Tile, Lewisport,KentuckyMajor 7.55 0.503 0.0785 8.13 Synthetic Area $1,136,473 $368,35687 Mutual Materials Co Mutual Materials- Mica Major 1.27 2.38 0.102 3.75 Synthetic Area $1,115,473 $363,15688 Mutual Materials Co Mutual MaterialsNewcastleMajor 1.76 1.86 0.0798 3.70 Synthetic Area $1,115,473 $363,15668 Old Virginia Brick Co Old Virginia- MadisonHeightsMajor 1.12 2.09 0.0895 3.30 Synthetic Area $1,115,473 $363,15669 Old Virginia Brick Co Old Virginia- Salem Major 1.51 2.83 0.121 4.46 Synthetic Area $2,221,945 $724,212176NR Pacific Clay Products Pacific Clay ProductsLake ElsinoreMajor 1.36 2.55 0.109 4.02 Synthetic Area $3,329,418 $1,085,468137 Pine Hall Brick Co,IncPine Hall- MadisonPlantMajor 6.68 11.7 0.690 19.1 Major $0 $0159 Ragland ClayProducts, LLCRagland ClayProductsMajor 0.445 0.833 0.0356 1.31 Synthetic Area $1,115,473 $363,15645 Richards Brick Co Richards Brick Major 1.22 2.29 0.0980 3.61 Synthetic Area $2,221,945 $724,21290 Sioux City Brick andTile CoSioux City- Adel Plant SyntheticArea4.86 5.41 0.314 10.6 Synthetic Area $29,000 $7,100140 Sioux City Brick andTile CoSioux City- SergeantBluff PlantSyntheticArea1.81 2.98 0.122 4.92 Synthetic Area $19,000 $4,60046 Statesville Brick Co Statesville Brick Major 1.95 5.04 0.216 7.21 Synthetic Area $2,615,020 $825,542116 Summit PressedBrick and Tile CoSummit- Brick Plantand Storage YardMajor 0.894 1.67 0.0716 2.64 Synthetic Area $1,115,473 $363,156A-31FacilityIDCompany NameFacility NameCurrentStatusFacility Emissions withPotential Control (tpy)Status WithPotentialControlCapitalCostAnnualCostHFHClCl2TotalHAP186 Summitville Tiles, Inc. Summitville Tiles, Inc.-Minerva PlantMajor 3.40 1.25 0.0535 4.70 Synthetic Area $3,340,418 $1,088,06849 Triangle Brick Triangle Brick- MerryOaks PlantSyntheticArea1.41 3.29 0.517 5.22 Synthetic Area $29,000 $7,100TriWade Triangle Brick Triangle BrickWadesboro PlantSyntheticArea0.904 4.26 0.428 5.59 Synthetic Area $29,000 $7,100124 Watsontown Brick Co Watsontown Brick Major 2.76 3.20 0.191 6.16 Synthetic Area $1,125,473 $365,656Whit Whitacre Greer Whitacre Greer Major 1.24 2.04 0.0858 3.37 Synthetic Area $2,615,020 $825,542147 Yankee Hill Brick andTileYankee Hill Brick andTileMajor 0.648 1.21 0.0519 1.91 Synthetic Area $1,115,473 $363,156

# Appendix B

Cost and Emission Reduction Estimates for Meeting the HBELB-1Table B-1. Acid Gas Emissions and Calculated HCl-Equivalent Emissions for Major Source KilnsaKilnIDFacilityIDFacility NameKiln DesignCapacity(tph)APCDHFEmissions(lb/hr)HClEmissions(lb/hr)Cl2Emissions(lb/hr)Total HClEquivalent (lb/hr)b507 ACME-8 Acme- Elgin Plant (ELP/ENP) 10.00 None6.040.8080.034614.1508 ACME-8 Acme- Elgin Plant (ELP/ENP) 19.10 DIFF 0.268 1.83 0.000401 2.27509 ACME-9 Acme- Eureka Plant (EBP) 3.99 None 4.210.3230.01388.18510 ACME-9 Acme- Eureka Plant (EBP) 3.99 None 4.210.3230.01388.18511 ACME-9 Acme- Eureka Plant (EBP) 3.99 None 4.210.3230.01388.18512 ACME-12 Acme- Holly Springs Plant (HSP) 8.45 None5.110.6830.029211.9513 ACME-14 Acme- Kanapolis Plant (KAP) 5.78 None3.490.4670.02008.12500 ACME-1 Acme- Ochs Brick Plant (AOP) 6.25 None3.780.5050.02168.78501 ACME-1 Acme- Ochs Brick Plant (AOP) 6.25 None3.780.5050.02168.78515 ACME-18 Acme- Perla Plant (PEP/PWP) 9.66 None 0.983 0.3100.03346.17516 ACME-18 Acme- Perla Plant (PEP/PWP) 7.86 None 0.983 0.5270.02725.56518 ACME-20 Acme- Texas Clay Plant (TCP) 10.20 DLA 0.142 2.000.02495.53519 ACME-20 Acme- Texas Clay Plant (TCP) 5.10 None3.080.4120.01767.17520 ACME-20 Acme- Texas Clay Plant (TCP) 5.10 None3.080.4120.01767.17521 ACME-21 Acme- Tulsa Plant (TUP) 8.51 None 11.2 2.550.029422.5522 ACME-23 Acme- Wheeler Plant (WTP) 7.01 None4.240.5670.02429.85684 35 Jenkins- Coosaada Plant 9.50 None11.51.540.065726.7685 35 Jenkins- Coosaada Plant 9.50 None11.51.540.065726.7523 2 American Eagle Brick Co 3.40 None2.060.2750.01184.78526 BELD-1 Belden- Plant #2 Sugarcreek 10.65 DIFF 0.344 0.191 0.0551 8.03527 BELD-1 Belden- Plant #3 Sugarcreek 13.70 DIFF 0.707 0.0960 0.00332 1.55528 BELD-1 Belden- Plant #6 Sugarcreek 5.32 None 2.97 0.1430.01846.83529 BELD-1 Belden- Plant #6 Sugarcreek 5.32 None 2.97 0.1430.01846.83530 BELD-1 Belden- Plant #6 Sugarcreek 5.32 None 1.03 0.06320.01843.99531 BELD-1 Belden- Plant #8 Sugarcreek 7.77 SD/ESP 4.49 1.09 0.139 26.0532 BELD-1 Belden- Plant #8 Sugarcreek 7.77 SD/ESP 5.12 1.25 0.159 29.7533 BELD-1 Belden- Plant #8 Sugarcreek 7.77 SD/ESP 5.12 1.25 0.159 29.7B-2KilnIDFacilityIDFacility NameKiln DesignCapacity(tph)APCDHFEmissions(lb/hr)HClEmissions(lb/hr)Cl2Emissions(lb/hr)Total HClEquivalent (lb/hr)b534 BELD-1 Belden- Plant #9 Sugarcreek 3.05 None 1.41 0.08670.01053.51535 BELD-1 Belden- Plant #9 Sugarcreek 3.05 None 1.41 0.08670.01053.51536 BELD-2 Belden- Plant 1 Strasburg 3.08 None1.860.2490.01074.33537 BORA-1 Boral- Atlanta Plant 14.97 DIFF 0.548 0.04170.03645.68538 BORA-1 Boral- Atlanta Plant 14.97 DIFF 1.85 0.1190.03647.62539 BORA-2 Boral- Augusta Plant 6 11.25 None 2.540.9090.03899.73540 BORA-2 Boral- Augusta Plant 6 11.25 None 2.540.9090.03899.73545 BORA-4 Boral- Bessemer Plant #5 12.00 None7.250.9700.041516.9546 BORA-4 Boral- Bessemer Plant #5 12.00 None7.250.9700.041516.9549 BORA-6 Boral- Gleason Plant 9.80 None 3.770.7920.033910.7550 BORA-6 Boral- Gleason Plant 9.80 None 3.770.7920.033910.7551 BORA-7 Boral- Henderson Facility 11.33 DLA 1.45 0.789 0.0275 6.53552 BORA-7 Boral- Henderson Facility 11.33 DLA 1.45 0.789 0.0275 6.53559 BORA-14 Boral- Phenix City-Plant 3 10.00 None 2.77 1.250.03469.81560 BORA-14 Boral- Phenix City-Plant 3 10.00 None 2.77 1.250.03469.81561 BORA-15 Boral- Phenix City-Plant 4 13.50 None8.161.090.046719.0562 BORA-15 Boral- Phenix City-Plant 4 11.20 None6.770.9050.038715.7563 BORA-15 Boral- Phenix City-Plant 4 11.20 None6.770.9050.038715.7699 181 Certainteed Corporation- Ludowici 7.78 None4.700.6290.026910.9575 19 Cherokee Brick & Tile 5.48 None3.310.4430.01907.70576 19 Cherokee Brick & Tile 5.48 None3.310.4430.01907.70577 19 Cherokee Brick & Tile 14.74 DLA 1.98 1.270.03608.89578 19 Cherokee Brick & Tile 14.74 DLA 2.07 1.240.03608.99581 34 Columbus Brick Company 7.90 None4.780.6390.027311.1582 34 Columbus Brick Company 7.90 None4.780.6390.027311.1583 34 Columbus Brick Company 18.30 DLA 0.610 0.6070.04477.43584 134 Commercial Brick Corp 12.26 None7.410.9910.042417.2585 134 Commercial Brick Corp 12.26 None7.410.9910.042417.2586 134 Commercial Brick Corp 12.26 None7.410.9910.042417.2B-3KilnIDFacilityIDFacility NameKiln DesignCapacity(tph)APCDHFEmissions(lb/hr)HClEmissions(lb/hr)Cl2Emissions(lb/hr)Total HClEquivalent (lb/hr)b587 64 Continental Brick- Martinsburg 8.35 None5.050.6750.028911.7588 64 Continental Brick- Martinsburg 8.35 None5.050.6750.028911.7594 153 Elgin Butler Plant 1.53 None0.9250.1240.005292.15595 153 Elgin Butler Plant 1.53 None0.9250.1240.005292.15596 23 Endicott Clay Products 9.00 None5.440.7280.031112.6597 23 Endicott Clay Products 9.00 None5.440.7280.031112.6598 23 Endicott Clay Products 8.86 None 1.400.7160.03066.79590 83 Cunningham- Cleveland Co 9.08 None5.490.7340.031412.8605 GENE-5 General Shale Brick-Plant 40 18.75 DIFF 0.8101.400.001872.80606 GENE-5 General Shale Brick-Plant 40 18.75 DIFF 2.69 0.9160.001875.00612 GENE-8 General Shale Brick-Plants 35 & 36 10.10 DLA 0.03750.6000.02473.94613 GENE-8 General Shale Brick-Plants 35 & 36 10.10 DLA 0.03750.6000.02473.94614 GENE-8 General Shale Brick-Plants 35 & 36 22.00 DLA 1.85 3.420.053713.2615 GENE-9 General Shale Brick-Plants 6 & 28 3.68 None2.220.2970.01275.17616 GENE-9 General Shale Brick-Plants 6 & 28 3.68 None2.220.2970.01275.17617 GENE-9 General Shale Brick-Plants 6 & 28 15.02 DLA0.5430.8920.03676.56618 GENE-15 General Shale- Corbin-Plant 33 9.90 None5.980.8000.034213.9619 GENE-15 General Shale- Corbin-Plant 33 14.40 None8.701.160.049820.2622 GENE-11 General Shale- Moncure Facility 13.70 None 0.9821.110.04748.83623 GENE-11 General Shale- Moncure Facility 13.70 None 0.9821.110.04748.83624 GENE-11 General Shale- Moncure Facility 20.55 DLA 0.06000.5530.05027.33625 GENE-11 General Shale- Moncure Facility 20.55 DLA 0.06000.5530.05027.33635 GLEN-1 Glen-Gery Corporation- Bigler 16.20 None9.791.310.056022.8636 GLEN-1 Glen-Gery Corporation- Bigler 16.20 None9.791.310.056022.8637 GLEN-2 Glen-Gery Corporation- Caledonia 8.89 None5.370.7190.030712.5638 GLEN-2 Glen-Gery Corporation- Caledonia 8.89 None5.370.7190.030712.5639 GLEN-3 Glen-Gery Corporation- Capitol 16.70 None10.11.350.057723.5644 GLEN-8 Glen-Gery Corporation- Marseilles 15.54 DLA 0.120 1.800.03797.03645 GLEN-8 Glen-Gery Corporation- Marseilles 15.96 DLA 0.181 1.360.03906.81B-4KilnIDFacilityIDFacility NameKiln DesignCapacity(tph)APCDHFEmissions(lb/hr)HClEmissions(lb/hr)Cl2Emissions(lb/hr)Total HClEquivalent (lb/hr)b642 GLEN-5 Glen-Gery Corporation- Redfield 10.94 None6.610.8840.037815.4648 GLEN-10 Glen-Gery Corporation- York 11.24 None6.790.9090.038915.8649 GLEN-10 Glen-Gery Corporation- York 19.76 DLA 0.5210.2030.04827.38650 HANS2 Hanson- Athens 9.53 None 5.251.560.033013.5671 HANS13 Hanson- Columbia - Plant 2 11.30 None6.830.9140.039115.9672 HANS13 Hanson- Columbia - Plant 2 11.30 None6.830.9140.039115.9652 HANS5 Hanson- Elgin 11.50 None 0.0176 0.04290.03985.37653 HANS5 Hanson- Elgin 12.20 DLS/FF 0.00550 0.02600.02973.99656 HANS7 Hanson- Mineral Wells East 7.99 None4.830.6460.027611.2667 HANS11 Hanson- Roseboro 10.50 None6.350.8490.036314.8668 HANS11 Hanson- Roseboro 10.50 None6.350.8490.036314.8669 HANS12 Hanson- Stanton 8.00 None 5.990.6470.027712.9677 145 Hebron Brick Plant 9.60 None 0.03000.7760.03325.25704 184 Ironrock Capital (formerly MetropolitanCeramics, Inc.)3.33 None 0.8610.2690.01153.03705 184 Ironrock Capital (formerly MetropolitanCeramics, Inc.)3.33 None 0.8610.2690.01153.03706 184 Ironrock Capital (formerly MetropolitanCeramics, Inc.)3.33 None 1.430.2690.01153.84707 184 Ironrock Capital (formerly MetropolitanCeramics, Inc.)3.33 None 1.050.2690.01153.30689 175NR Kansas Brick and Tile 6.00 None3.630.4850.02078.43690 104 Kasten Clay Products 3.74 None2.260.3030.01295.26703 139 McNear Brickyard 8.20 None4.960.6630.028411.5693 135 Lee Brick Sanford Facility 12.24 None7.400.9890.042317.2694 135 Lee Brick Sanford Facility 9.64 None 3.930.7790.033310.8695 135 Lee Brick Sanford Facility 12.67 None 5.80 0.1100.043814.2696 135 Lee Brick Sanford Facility 13.50 DLA 0.04331.100.03305.56701 50 Marion Ceramics 3.13 None1.890.2530.01084.40702 42 McAvoy Brick 12.00 None7.250.9700.041516.9B-5KilnIDFacilityIDFacility NameKiln DesignCapacity(tph)APCDHFEmissions(lb/hr)HClEmissions(lb/hr)Cl2Emissions(lb/hr)Total HClEquivalent (lb/hr)b592 MOHA-4 Dal-Tile, Fayette, Alabama 3.56 None2.150.2880.01235.00593 MOHA-4 Dal-Tile, Fayette, Alabama 3.56 None2.150.2880.01235.00178 MOHA-6 Dal-Tile, Lewisport, Kentucky 1.75 None 1.660.04870.006053.22179 MOHA-6 Dal-Tile, Lewisport, Kentucky 1.98 None 0.6990.03680.006851.95180 MOHA-6 Dal-Tile, Lewisport, Kentucky 1.98 None 0.8440.04370.006852.16709 87 Mutual Materials- Mica 9.60 None5.800.7760.033213.5710 88 Mutual Materials- Newcastle 7.52 None 6.670.6080.026013.6711 68 Old Virginia- Madison Heights 8.44 None5.100.6820.029211.9712 69 Old Virginia- Salem 6.77 None4.090.5470.02349.51713 69 Old Virginia- Salem 4.65 None2.810.3760.01616.54714 176NR Pacific Clay Products- Lake Elsinore 2.57 None1.550.2080.008893.61715 176NR Pacific Clay Products- Lake Elsinore 2.57 None1.550.2080.008893.61716 176NR Pacific Clay Products- Lake Elsinore 5.14 None3.110.4160.01787.22727 137 Pine Hall- Madison Plant 9.54 None5.770.7710.033013.4728 137 Pine Hall- Madison Plant 9.54 None5.770.7710.033013.4729 137 Pine Hall- Madison Plant 13.30 DLA 0.2850.1380.03254.87730 137 Pine Hall- Madison Plant 13.30 DLA 0.2390.1530.03254.82731 137 Pine Hall- Madison Plant 9.60 None 3.190.7600.03329.75732 137 Pine Hall- Madison Plant 9.60 None 3.190.7600.03329.75735 159 Ragland Clay Products 3.36 None2.030.2720.01164.72742 45 Richards Brick 4.62 None2.790.3730.01606.49743 45 Richards Brick 4.62 None2.790.3730.01606.49753 46 Statesville Brick 11.00 None 2.890.8890.038010.1754 46 Statesville Brick 9.35 None5.650.7560.032313.1758 116 Summit- Brick Plant and Storage Yard 6.75 None4.080.5460.02339.49759 186 Summitville Tiles, Inc.-Minerva Plant 1.11 None0.6710.08970.003841.56760 186 Summitville Tiles, Inc.-Minerva Plant 1.24 None0.7500.1000.004291.74761 186 Summitville Tiles, Inc.-Minerva Plant 1.11 None0.6710.08970.003841.56762 186 Summitville Tiles, Inc.-Minerva Plant 1.11 None0.6710.08970.003841.56B-6KilnIDFacilityIDFacility NameKiln DesignCapacity(tph)APCDHFEmissions(lb/hr)HClEmissions(lb/hr)Cl2Emissions(lb/hr)Total HClEquivalent (lb/hr)b773 124 Watsontown Brick 7.98 None4.830.6450.027611.2774 124 Watsontown Brick 10.00 DIFF0.3890.2800.02434.08775 Whit Whitacre Greer 11.90 None7.190.9620.041216.7776 Whit Whitacre Greer 6.80 None4.110.5500.02359.56777 147 Yankee Hill Brick and Tile 4.90 None2.960.3960.01696.88aValues in plain font are lb/hr emissions from test data. Values in bold italic underlined font were calculated by multiplyingemission factors by APCD and the kilndesign capacity.bHCl-equivalent emissions calculated using the equation in Section IV of this memorandum.B-7Table B-2. Total Facility HCl-Equivalent EmissionsFacility IDCompany NameFacility NameCityStateTotal HClEquivalent (lb/hr)ACME-8 Acme Brick Company Acme- Elgin Plant (ELP/ENP) Elgin TX 16.3ACME-9 Acme Brick Company Acme- Eureka Plant (EBP) Clarksville AR 24.5ACME-12 Acme Brick Company Acme- Holly Springs Plant (HSP) Holly Springs MS 11.9ACME-14 Acme Brick Company Acme- Kanapolis Plant (KAP) Kanopolis KS 8.12ACME-1 Acme Brick Company Acme- Ochs Brick Plant (AOP) Springfield MN 17.6ACME-18 Acme Brick Company Acme- Perla Plant (PEP/PWP) Malvern AR 11.7ACME-20 Acme Brick Company Acme- Texas Clay Plant (TCP) Malakoff TX 19.9ACME-21 Acme Brick Company Acme- Tulsa Plant (TUP) Tulsa OK 22.5ACME-23 Acme Brick Company Acme- Wheeler Plant (WTP) Jonesboro AR 9.8535 Acme Brick Company Jenkins- Coosaada Plant Coosaada AL 53.42 American Eagle Brick Co American Eagle Brick Co Sunland Park NM 4.78BELD-1 Belden Brick Company Belden-Plant #2 Sugarcreek Sugarcreek OH 120BELD-2 Belden Brick Company Belden- Plant 1 Strasburg Strasburg OH 4.33BORA-1 Boral Bricks Inc. Boral- Atlanta Plant Smyrna GA 13.3BORA-2 Boral Bricks Inc. Boral- Augusta Plant 6 Augusta GA 19.5BORA-4 Boral Bricks Inc. Boral- Bessemer Plant #5 Bessemer AL 33.7BORA-6 Boral Bricks Inc. Boral- Gleason Plant Gleason TN 21.4BORA-7 Boral Bricks Inc. Boral- Henderson Facility Henderson TX 13.1BORA-14 Boral Bricks Inc. Boral- Phenix City-Plant 3 Phenix City AL 19.6BORA-15 Boral Bricks Inc. Boral- Phenix City-Plant 4 Phenix City AL 50.5181 Certainteed Corporation Certainteed Corporation- Ludowici New Lexington OH 10.919 Cherokee Brick & Tile Co Cherokee Brick & Tile Macon GA 33.334 Columbus Brick Co ColumbusBrick Company Columbus MS 29.6134 Commercial Brick Corp Commercial Brick Corp Wewoka OK 51.764 Continental Brick Co Continental Brick- Martinsburg Martinsburg WV 23.5153 Elgin-Butler Brick Co Elgin Butler Plant Elgin TX 4.3023 Endicott Clay Products Co Endicott Clay Products Fairbury NE 32.183 General Shale Brick, Inc Cunningham- Cleveland Co Grover NC 12.8B-8Facility IDCompany NameFacility NameCityStateTotal HClEquivalent (lb/hr)GENE-5 General Shale Brick, Inc General Shale Brick-Plant 40 Coosa GA 7.80GENE-8 General Shale Brick, Inc General ShaleBrick-Plants 35 & 36 Blue Ridge (Roanoke) VA 21.1GENE-9 General Shale Brick, Inc General Shale Brick-Plants 6 & 28 Atkins (Marion) VA 16.9GENE-15 General Shale Brick, Inc GeneralShale- Corbin-Plant 33 Woodbine KY 34.2GENE-11 General Shale Brick, Inc GeneralShale- Moncure Facility Moncure NC 32.3GLEN-1 Glen Gery Glen-Gery Corporation- Bigler Bigler PA 45.5GLEN-2 Glen Gery Glen-Gery Corporation- Caledonia Caledonia OH 25.0GLEN-3 Glen Gery Glen-Gery Corporation- Capitol Manassas VA 23.5GLEN-8 Glen Gery Glen-Gery Corporation- Marseilles Marseilles IL 13.8GLEN-5 Glen Gery Glen-Gery Corporation- Redfield Redfield IA 15.4GLEN-10 Glen Gery Glen-Gery Corporation- York York PA 23.2HANS2 Hanson Brick East, LLC Hanson- Athens Athens TX 13.5HANS13 Hanson Brick East, LLC Hanson- Columbia - Plant 2 Columbia SC 31.8HANS5 Hanson Brick East, LLC Hanson- Elgin Elgin TX 9.36HANS7 Hanson Brick East, LLC Hanson- Mineral Wells East Mineral Wells TX 11.2HANS11 Hanson Brick East, LLC Hanson- Roseboro Roseboro NC 29.5HANS12 Hanson Brick East, LLC Hanson- Stanton Stanton KY 12.9145 Hebron Brick Company Hebron Brick Plant Hebron ND 5.25184 Ironrock Capital (formerlyMetropolitan Ceramics, Inc.)Ironrock Capital (formerly MetropolitanCeramics, Inc.)Canton OH 13.2175NR Kansas Brick and Tile Co Kansas Brick and Tile Hoisington KS 8.43104 Kasten Clay Products Co Kasten Clay Products Jackson MO 5.26139 L.P. McNear Brick Co, Inc McNear Brickyard San Rafael CA 11.5135 Lee Brick and Tile Co Lee Brick Sanford Facility Sanford NC 47.850 Marion Ceramics, Inc Marion Ceramics Pee Dee SC 4.4042 McAvoy Brick Co McAvoy Brick Phoenixville PA 16.9MOHA-4 Mohawk Industries Dal-Tile, Fayette, Alabama Fayette AL 10.0MOHA-6 Mohawk Industries Dal-Tile, Lewisport, Kentucky Lewisport KY 7.3387 Mutual Materials Co Mutual Materials- Mica Mica WA 13.588 Mutual Materials Co Mutual Materials- Newcastle Renton WA 13.6B-9Facility IDCompany NameFacility NameCityStateTotal HClEquivalent (lb/hr)68 Old Virginia Brick Co Old Virginia- Madison Heights Madison Heights VA 11.969 Old Virginia Brick Co Old Virginia- Salem Salem VA 16.1176NR Pacific Clay Products Pacific Clay Products- Lake Elsinore Lake Elsinore CA 14.4137 Pine Hall Brick Co, Inc Pine Hall- Madison Plant Madison NC 56.0159 Ragland Clay Products, LLC Ragland Clay Products Ragland AL 4.7245 Richards Brick Co Richards Brick Edwardsville IL 13.046 Statesville Brick Co Statesville Brick Statesville NC 23.2116 Summit Pressed Brick and Tile Co Summit- Brick Plant and Storage Yard Pueblo CO 9.49186 Summitville Tiles, Inc. Summitville Tiles, Inc.- Minerva Plant Minerva OH 6.42124 Watsontown Brick Co Watsontown Brick Watsontown PA 15.3Whit Whitacre Greer Whitacre Greer Alliance OH 26.3147 Yankee Hill Brick and Tile Yankee Hill Brick and Tile Lincoln NE 6.88

# Appendix C

Estimate of Non-Hg HAP Metal s Emissions (lb/hr) by KilnC-1Table C-1. Estimate of Non-Hg HAP Metals Emissions by KilnKiln IDFacilityIDCompany NameFacility NameCityStateKilnDesignCapacityAPCDAveragePM(lb/ton)AveragePM(lb/hr)Averagenon-HgHAPmetals(lb/hr)507 ACME-8 Acme BrickCompanyAcme- Elgin Plant(ELP/ENP)Elgin TX 10.00 None 0.324a3.24b0.0356c508 ACME-8 Acme BrickCompanyAcme- Elgin Plant(ELP/ENP)Elgin TX 19.10 DIFF 0.0100 0.161 0.00271509 ACME-9 Acme BrickCompanyAcme- Eureka Plant(EBP)Clarksville AR 3.99 None 0.324a1.29b0.0142c510 ACME-9 Acme BrickCompanyAcme- Eureka Plant(EBP)Clarksville AR 3.99 None 0.324a1.29b0.0142c511 ACME-9 Acme BrickCompanyAcme- Eureka Plant(EBP)Clarksville AR 3.99 None 0.324a1.29b0.0142c512 ACME-12 Acme BrickCompanyAcme- Holly SpringsPlant (HSP)Holly Springs MS 8.45 None 0.324a2.74b0.0301c513 ACME-14 Acme BrickCompanyAcme- Kanapolis Plant(KAP)Kanopolis KS 5.78 None 0.324a1.87b0.0206c500 ACME-1 Acme BrickCompanyAcme- Ochs Brick Plant(AOP)Springfield MN 6.25 None 0.324a2.02b0.0223c501 ACME-1 Acme BrickCompanyAcme- Ochs Brick Plant(AOP)Springfield MN 6.25 None 0.324a2.02b0.0223c515 ACME-18 Acme BrickCompanyAcme- Perla Plant(PEP/PWP)Malvern AR 9.66 None 0.292d2.82b0.0310c516 ACME-18 Acme BrickCompanyAcme- Perla Plant(PEP/PWP)Malvern AR 7.86 None 0.292 1.90 0.0209e518 ACME-20 Acme BrickCompanyAcme- Texas Clay Plant(TCP)Malakoff TX 10.20 DLA 0.106 1.08 0.0119e519/520 ACME-20 Acme BrickCompanyAcme- Texas Clay Plant(TCP)Malakoff TX 10.20 None 0.324a3.30b0.0363c521 ACME-21 Acme BrickCompanyAcme- Tulsa Plant (TUP) Tulsa OK 8.51 None 0.231 1.97 0.0216eC-2Kiln IDFacilityIDCompany NameFacility NameCityStateKilnDesignCapacityAPCDAveragePM(lb/ton)AveragePM(lb/hr)Averagenon-HgHAPmetals(lb/hr)522 ACME-23 Acme BrickCompanyAcme- Wheeler Plant(WTP)Jonesboro AR 7.01 None 0.324a2.27b0.0250c523 2 American EagleBrick CoAmerican Eagle Brick Co Sunland Park NM 3.40 None 0.324a1.10b0.0121c526 BELD-1 Belden BrickCompanyBelden- Plant #2SugarcreekSugarcreek OH 10.65 DIFF 0.0697 0.519 0.00115527 BELD-1 Belden BrickCompanyBelden- Plant #3SugarcreekSugarcreek OH 13.70 DIFF 0.0770 0.649 0.00372528/529/530BELD-1 Belden BrickCompanyBelden- Plant #6SugarcreekSugarcreek OH 15.96 None 0.391 4.02 0.0443e531/532/533BELD-1 Belden BrickCompanyBelden- Plant #8SugarcreekSugarcreek OH 23.31 SD/ESP 0.111 2.23 0.0246e534/535 BELD-1 Belden BrickCompanyBelden- Plant #9SugarcreekSugarcreek OH 6.10 None 0.664 3.28 0.0361e536 BELD-2 Belden BrickCompanyBelden- Plant 1 Strasburg Strasburg OH 3.08 None 0.324a0.997b0.0110c537/538 BORA-1 Boral Bricks Inc. Boral- Atlanta Plant Smyrna GA 29.94 DIFF 0.00868 0.204 0.00224e539 BORA-2 Boral Bricks Inc. Boral- Augusta Plant 6 Augusta GA 11.25 None 0.282 2.63 0.0289e540 BORA-2 Boral Bricks Inc. Boral- Augusta Plant 6 Augusta GA 11.25 None 0.282d2.63 0.0289e545 BORA-4 Boral Bricks Inc. Boral- Bessemer Plant #5 Bessemer AL 12.00 None 0.324a3.89b0.0427c546 BORA-4 Boral Bricks Inc. Boral- Bessemer Plant #5 Bessemer AL 12.00 None 0.324a3.89b0.0427c549 BORA-6 Boral Bricks Inc. Boral- Gleason Plant Gleason TN 9.80 None 0.0196 0.116 0.00127e550 BORA-6 Boral Bricks Inc. Boral- Gleason Plant Gleason TN 9.80 None 0.0196d0.116 0.00127e551/552 BORA-7 Boral Bricks Inc. Boral- Henderson Facility Henderson TX 22.66 DLA 0.553 11.4 0.125e559 BORA-14 Boral Bricks Inc. Boral- Phenix City-Plant 3 Phenix City AL 10.00 None 0.324a3.24b0.0356c560 BORA-14 Boral Bricks Inc. Boral- Phenix City-Plant 3 Phenix City AL 10.00 None 0.324a3.24b0.0356c561 BORA-15 Boral Bricks Inc. Boral- Phenix City-Plant 4 Phenix City AL 11.20 None 0.324a3.63b0.0399c562 BORA-15 Boral Bricks Inc. Boral- Phenix City-Plant 4 Phenix City AL 11.20 None 0.324a3.63b0.0399c563 BORA-15 Boral Bricks Inc. Boral- Phenix City-Plant 4 Phenix City AL 13.50 None 0.324a4.37b0.0481cC-3Kiln IDFacilityIDCompany NameFacility NameCityStateKilnDesignCapacityAPCDAveragePM(lb/ton)AveragePM(lb/hr)Averagenon-HgHAPmetals(lb/hr)699 181 CertainteedCorporationCertainteed CorporationLudowiciNew Lexington OH 7.78 None 0.324a2.52b0.0277c575 19 Cherokee Brick &Tile CoCherokee Brick & Tile Macon GA 5.48 None 0.324a1.77b0.0195c576 19 Cherokee Brick &Tile CoCherokee Brick & Tile Macon GA 5.48 None 0.324a1.77b0.0195c577/578 19 Cherokee Brick &Tile CoCherokee Brick & Tile Macon GA 29.48 DLA 0.241 7.93 0.0872e581 34 Columbus BrickCoColumbus BrickCompanyColumbus MS 7.90 None 0.324a2.56b0.0281c582 34 Columbus BrickCoColumbus BrickCompanyColumbus MS 7.90 None 0.324a2.56b0.0281c583 34 Columbus BrickCoColumbus BrickCompanyColumbus MS 18.30 DLA 0.0477 0.643 0.00708e584 134 Commercial BrickCorpCommercial Brick Corp Wewoka OK 12.26 None 0.324a3.97b0.0437c585 134 Commercial BrickCorpCommercial Brick Corp Wewoka OK 12.26 None 0.324a3.97b0.0437c586 134 Commercial BrickCorpCommercial Brick Corp Wewoka OK 12.26 None 0.324a3.97b0.0437c587 64 Continental BrickCoContinental BrickMartinsburgMartinsburg WV 8.35 None 0.324a2.70b0.0297c588 64 Continental BrickCoContinental BrickMartinsburgMartinsburg WV 8.35 None 0.324a2.70b0.0297c590 83 Cunningham BrickCompany, IncCunningham- ClevelandCoGrover NC 9.08 None 0.324a2.94b0.0323c592 MOHA-4 MohawkIndustriesDal-Tile, Fayette,AlabamaFayette AL 3.56 None 0.324a1.15b0.0127c593 MOHA-4 MohawkIndustriesDal-Tile, Fayette,AlabamaFayette AL 3.56 None 0.324a1.15b0.0127cC-4Kiln IDFacilityIDCompany NameFacility NameCityStateKilnDesignCapacityAPCDAveragePM(lb/ton)AveragePM(lb/hr)Averagenon-HgHAPmetals(lb/hr)178 MOHA-6 MohawkIndustriesDal-Tile, Lewisport,KentuckyLewisport KY 1.75 None 0.243 0.508 0.00559e179 MOHA-6 MohawkIndustriesDal-Tile, Lewisport,KentuckyLewisport KY 1.98 None 0.313 0.566 0.00623e180 MOHA-6 MohawkIndustriesDal-Tile, Lewisport,KentuckyLewisport KY 1.98 None 0.183 0.344 0.00378e594 153 Elgin-Butler BrickCoElgin Butler Plant Elgin TX 1.53 None 0.324a0.495b0.00545c595 153 Elgin-Butler BrickCoElgin Butler Plant Elgin TX 1.53 None 0.324a0.495b0.00545c596 23 Endicott ClayProducts CoEndicott Clay Products Fairbury NE 9.00 None 0.324a2.91b0.0321c597 23 Endicott ClayProducts CoEndicott Clay Products Fairbury NE 9.00 None 0.324a2.91b0.0321c598 23 Endicott ClayProducts CoEndicott Clay Products Fairbury NE 8.86 None 0.324a2.87b0.0316c605 GENE-5 General ShaleBrick, IncGeneral Shale Brick-Plant40Coosa GA 18.75 DIFF 0.0390d0.655 0.00721e606 GENE-5 General ShaleBrick, IncGeneral Shale Brick-Plant40Coosa GA 18.75 DIFF 0.0390 0.655 0.00335612/613 GENE-8 General ShaleBrick, IncGeneral Shale BrickPlants 35 & 36Blue Ridge(Roanoke)VA 20.20 DLA 0.413 6.11 0.0672e614 GENE-8 General ShaleBrick, IncGeneral Shale BrickPlants 35 & 36Blue Ridge(Roanoke)VA 22.00 DLA 0.165a3.64b0.0400c615 GENE-9 General ShaleBrick, IncGeneral Shale BrickPlants 6 & 28Atkins (Marion) VA 3.68 None 0.324a1.19b0.0131c616 GENE-9 General ShaleBrick, IncGeneral Shale BrickPlants 6 & 28Atkins (Marion) VA 3.68 None 0.324a1.19b0.0131c617 GENE-9 General ShaleBrick, IncGeneral Shale BrickPlants 6 & 28Atkins (Marion) VA 15.02 DLA 0.165a2.49b0.0273cC-5Kiln IDFacilityIDCompany NameFacility NameCityStateKilnDesignCapacityAPCDAveragePM(lb/ton)AveragePM(lb/hr)Averagenon-HgHAPmetals(lb/hr)618 GENE-15 General ShaleBrick, IncGeneral Shale- CorbinPlant 33Woodbine KY 9.90 None 0.324a3.21b0.0353c619 GENE-15 General ShaleBrick, IncGeneral Shale- CorbinPlant 33Woodbine KY 14.40 None 0.324a4.66b0.0513c622/623 GENE-11 General ShaleBrick, IncGeneral Shale- MoncureFacilityMoncure NC 27.40 None 0.324a8.87b0.0976c624 GENE-11 General ShaleBrick, IncGeneral Shale- MoncureFacilityMoncure NC 20.55 DLA 0.0910d1.81 0.0199e625 GENE-11 General ShaleBrick, IncGeneral Shale- MoncureFacilityMoncure NC 20.55 DLA 0.0910 1.81 0.0199e635 GLEN-1 Glen Gery Glen-Gery CorporationBiglerBigler PA 16.20 None 0.324a5.24b0.0577c636 GLEN-1 Glen Gery Glen-Gery CorporationBiglerBigler PA 16.20 None 0.324a5.24b0.0577c637 GLEN-2 Glen Gery Glen-Gery CorporationCaledoniaCaledonia OH 8.89 None 0.324a2.88b0.0317c638 GLEN-2 Glen Gery Glen-Gery CorporationCaledoniaCaledonia OH 8.89 None 0.324a2.88b0.0317c639 GLEN-3 Glen Gery Glen-Gery CorporationCapitolManassas VA 17.00 None 0.324a5.50b0.0605c644 GLEN-8 Glen Gery Glen-Gery CorporationMarseillesMarseilles IL 15.54 DLA 0.178 2.66 0.0292e645 GLEN-8 Glen Gery Glen-Gery CorporationMarseillesMarseilles IL 15.96 DLA 0.262 4.14 0.0456e642 GLEN-5 Glen Gery Glen-Gery CorporationRedfieldRedfield IA 10.94 None 0.324a3.54b0.0390c648 GLEN-10 Glen Gery Glen-Gery CorporationYorkYork PA 11.24 None 0.324a3.64b0.0400c649 GLEN-10 Glen Gery Glen-Gery CorporationYorkYork PA 19.76 DLA 0.0566 0.677 0.00744eC-6Kiln IDFacilityIDCompany NameFacility NameCityStateKilnDesignCapacityAPCDAveragePM(lb/ton)AveragePM(lb/hr)Averagenon-HgHAPmetals(lb/hr)650 HANS2 Hanson BrickEast, LLCHanson- Athens Athens TX 9.53 None 0.250 2.48 0.0272e671 HANS13 Hanson BrickEast, LLCHanson- Columbia - Plant2Columbia SC 11.30 None 0.324a3.66b0.0402c672 HANS13 Hanson BrickEast, LLCHanson- Columbia - Plant2Columbia SC 11.30 None 0.324a3.66b0.0402c652 HANS5 Hanson BrickEast, LLCHanson- Elgin Elgin TX 11.50 None 0.324a3.72b0.0410c653 HANS5 Hanson BrickEast, LLCHanson- Elgin Elgin TX 12.20 DIFF 0.0516 0.452 0.00148656 HANS7 Hanson BrickEast, LLCHanson- Mineral WellsEastMineral Wells TX 7.99 None 0.324a2.59b0.0285c667 HANS11 Hanson BrickEast, LLCHanson- Roseboro Roseboro NC 10.50 None 0.324a3.40b0.0374c668 HANS11 Hanson BrickEast, LLCHanson- Roseboro Roseboro NC 10.50 None 0.324a3.40b0.0374c669 HANS12 Hanson BrickEast, LLCHanson- Stanton Stanton KY 8.00 None 0.376 2.84 0.0312e677 145 Hebron BrickCompanyHebron Brick Plant Hebron ND 9.60 None 0.324a3.11b0.0342c704/705/706/707184 Ironrock Capital(formerlyMetropolitanCeramics, Inc.)Ironrock Capital (formerlyMetropolitan Ceramics,Inc.)Canton OH 13.32 None 0.746 8.27 0.0910e684 35 Acme BrickCompanyJenkins- Coosaada Plant Coosaada AL 9.50 None 0.324a3.08b0.0338c685 35 Acme BrickCompanyJenkins- Coosaada Plant Coosaada AL 9.50 None 0.324a3.08b0.0338c689 175NR Kansas Brick andTile CoKansas Brick and Tile Hoisington KS 6.00 None 0.324a1.94b0.0214cC-7Kiln IDFacilityIDCompany NameFacility NameCityStateKilnDesignCapacityAPCDAveragePM(lb/ton)AveragePM(lb/hr)Averagenon-HgHAPmetals(lb/hr)690 104 Kasten ClayProducts CoKasten Clay Products Jackson MO 3.74 None 0.324a1.21b0.0133c693 135 Lee Brick and TileCoLee Brick Sanford Facility Sanford NC 12.24 None 0.0116d0.117 0.00129e694 135 Lee Brick and TileCoLee Brick Sanford Facility Sanford NC 9.64 None 0.324a3.12b0.0343c695 135 Lee Brick and TileCoLee Brick Sanford Facility Sanford NC 12.67 None 0.0116 0.117 0.00129e696 135 Lee Brick and TileCoLee Brick Sanford Facility Sanford NC 13.50 DLA 0.0176 0.193 0.00213e701 50 Marion Ceramics,IncMarion Ceramics Pee Dee SC 3.13 None 0.324a1.01b0.0112c702 42 McAvoy Brick Co McAvoy Brick Phoenixville PA 12.00 None 0.324a3.89b0.0427c703 139 L.P. McNear BrickCo, IncMcNear Brickyard San Rafael CA 8.20 None 0.324a2.65b0.0292c709 87 Mutual MaterialsCoMutual Materials-Mica Mica WA 9.60 None 0.324a3.11b0.0342c710 88 Mutual MaterialsCoMutual MaterialsNewcastleRenton WA 7.52 None 0.324a2.44b0.0268c711 68 Old Virginia BrickCoOld Virginia- MadisonHeightsMadisonHeightsVA 8.44 None 0.324a2.73b0.0301c712 69 Old Virginia BrickCoOld Virginia-Salem Salem VA 6.77 None 0.324a2.19b0.0241c713 69 Old Virginia BrickCoOld Virginia-Salem Salem VA 4.65 None 0.324a1.51b0.0166c714 176NR Pacific ClayProductsPacific Clay ProductsLake ElsinoreLake Elsinore CA 2.57 None 0.324a0.832b0.00915c715 176NR Pacific ClayProductsPacific Clay ProductsLake ElsinoreLake Elsinore CA 2.57 None 0.324a0.832b0.00915c716 176NR Pacific ClayProductsPacific Clay ProductsLake ElsinoreLake Elsinore CA 5.14 None 0.324a1.66b0.0183cC-8Kiln IDFacilityIDCompany NameFacility NameCityStateKilnDesignCapacityAPCDAveragePM(lb/ton)AveragePM(lb/hr)Averagenon-HgHAPmetals(lb/hr)727/728 137 Pine Hall BrickCo, IncPine Hall- Madison Plant Madison NC 19.08 None 0.324a6.18b0.0679c729/730 137 Pine Hall BrickCo, IncPine Hall- Madison Plant Madison NC 26.60 DLA 0.139 3.47 0.0381e731/732 137 Pine Hall BrickCo, IncPine Hall- Madison Plant Madison NC 19.20 None 0.324a6.22b0.0684c735 159 Ragland ClayProducts, LLCRagland Clay Products Ragland AL 3.36 None 0.324a1.09b0.0120c742 45 Richards Brick Co Richards Brick Edwardsville IL 4.62 None 0.324a1.50b0.0165c743 45 Richards Brick Co Richards Brick Edwardsville IL 4.62 None 0.324a1.50b0.0165c753 46 Statesville BrickCoStatesville Brick Statesville NC 11.00 None 0.324a3.56b0.0392c754 46 Statesville BrickCoStatesville Brick Statesville NC 9.35 None 0.324a3.03b0.0333c758 116 Summit PressedBrick and Tile CoSummit- Brick Plant andStorage YardPueblo CO 6.75 None 0.324a2.19b0.0240c759 186 Summitville Tiles,Inc.Summitville Tiles, Inc.-Minerva PlantMinerva OH 1.11 None 0.324a0.359b0.00395c760 186 Summitville Tiles,Inc.Summitville Tiles, Inc.-Minerva PlantMinerva OH 1.24 None 0.324a0.401b0.00442c761 186 Summitville Tiles,Inc.Summitville Tiles, Inc.-Minerva PlantMinerva OH 1.11 None 0.324a0.359b0.00395c762 186 Summitville Tiles,Inc.Summitville Tiles, Inc.-Minerva PlantMinerva OH 1.11 None 0.324a0.359b0.00395c773 124 Watsontown BrickCoWatsontown Brick Watsontown PA 7.98 None 0.324a2.58b0.0284c774 124 Watsontown BrickCoWatsontown Brick Watsontown PA 10.00 DIFF 0.0555a0.555b0.00610c775 Whit Whitacre Greer Whitacre Greer Alliance OH 11.90 None 0.641 5.83 0.0641e776 Whit Whitacre Greer Whitacre Greer Alliance OH 6.80 None 0.324a2.20b0.0242cC-9Kiln IDFacilityIDCompany NameFacility NameCityStateKilnDesignCapacityAPCDAveragePM(lb/ton)AveragePM(lb/hr)Averagenon-HgHAPmetals(lb/hr)777 147 Yankee Hill Brickand TileYankee Hill Brick and Tile Lincoln NE 4.90 None 0.324a1.59b0.0174caNo PM or HAP metals test data available;value is emission factor based on APCD.bNo PM or HAP metals test data available; value calculated by multiplying lb/ton value and kiln capacity.cNo PM or HAP metals test data available; value calculated bymultiplying lb/hr PM emissions and average percentage of PM thatis metal HAP (1.1%).dNo PM test data available, assigned same lb/ton value as tested identical kiln at the same facility.eKiln not tested for HAP metals; value calculated by multiplying lb/hr PM emissions and average percentage of PM that is metalHAP (1.1%).

# Modeled Plants with some available data

FACILITY

_ID Business

Size Capital Cost Annual Cost

100 Small $19,000 $7,584

101 Small $19,000 $7,584

102 Small $175,697 $118,831

103 Small $4,980,090 $2,074,665

104 Small $51,000 $24,336

105 Small $1,540,000 $598,293

106 Small $19,000 $7,584

107 Small $19,000 $4,600

108 Small $19,000 $7,584

109 Small $19,000 $7,584

110 Small $29,000 $13,068

111 Small $19,000 $4,600

112 Small $19,000 $7,584

113 Small $19,000 $7,584

114 Small $40,000 $18,752

115 Small $19,000 $4,600

116 Large $19,000 $7,584

117 Small $19,000 $7,584

118 Small $51,000 $24,336

119 Small $1,686,697 $704,056

120 Small $19,000 $7,584

121 Small $40,000 $18,752

122 Small $1,540,000 $598,293

123 Large $29,000 $13,068

124 Small $19,000 $7,584

125 Small $29,000 $13,068

126 Small $1,675,697 $698,372

127 Small $29,000 $7,100

128 Small $19,000 $7,584

129 Small $29,000 $13,068

130 Small $19,000 $7,584

131 Small $29,000 $13,068

132 Small $29,000 $7,100

133 Large $19,000 $7,584

134 Small $19,000 $7,584

135 Small $19,000 $7,584

136 Small $29,000 $7,100

137 Large $29,000 $13,068

138 Large $19,000 $7,584

139 Large $19,000 $7,584

140 Large $29,000 $13,068

141 Large $1,675,697 $698,372

142 Large $19,000 $7,584

143 Large $19,000 $7,584

# FACILITY

_ID Business

Size Capital Cost Annual Cost

144 Large $19,000 $4,600

145 Large $1,822,393 $804,136

146 Large $40,000 $18,752

147 Large $4,174,393 $1,259,324

148 Large $19,000 $7,584

149 Large $165,697 $113,347

150 Large $19,000 $4,600

151 Large $3,008,095 $926,873

152 Large $1,540,000 $598,293

153 Large $19,000 $4,600

154 Large $19,000 $4,600

155 Large $3,008,095 $926,873

156 Large $3,322,393 $1,383,677

157 Large $19,000 $4,600

158 Large $29,000 $13,068

159 Large $1,665,697 $692,888

160 Small $19,000 $4,600

161 Large $4,540,000 $1,757,375

162 Large $19,000 $4,600

163 Large $1,675,697 $698,372

164 Large $29,000 $13,068

165 Large $3,029,000 $1,172,150

166 Large $1,540,000 $598,293

167 Large $3,322,393 $1,383,677

168 Large $1,518,548 $466,986

169 Large $29,000 $13,068

170 Large $1,508,548 $464,486

171 Large $1,508,548 $464,486

172 Large $3,322,393 $1,383,677

173 Large $3,029,000 $1,172,150

174 Large $19,000 $7,584

175 Large $3,029,000 $1,172,150

176 Large $19,000 $4,600

177 Large $19,000 $7,584

178 Large $1,518,548 $466,986

179 Large $19,000 $7,584

180 Large $19,000 $4,600

181 Large $29,000 $13,068

182 Large $40,000 $18,752

183 Small $29,000 $7,100

184 Small $1,675,697 $698,372

$64,579,010 $24,628,501BSCPEXISTING SOURCE FLOORSProposed Promulgated Proposed Promulgated Proposed Promulgated0.16 lb/ton PM -- -- --OR 0.040 gr/dscf PM at 7 percent O2 -- -- --OR 0.023 lb/hr non-Hg HAP metals -- -- ---- 0.036 lb/ton PM 2.2 E-05 lb/ton 4.0 E-05 lb/ton-- OR 0.0029 gr/dscf PM at 17 percent O2 OR 29 μg/dscm at 7 percent O2 OR 7.6 μg/dscm at 17 percent O2-- OR 0.0057 lb/hr non-Hg HAP metals OR 2.7 E-04 lb/hr OR 5.4 E-04 lb/hr-- 0.37 lb/ton PM 2.0 E-04 lb/ton 3.3 E-04 lb/ton-- OR 0.0021 gr/dscf PM at 17 percent O2 OR 70 μg/dscm at 7 percent O2 OR 88 μg/dscm at 17 percent O2-- OR 0.11 lb/hr non-Hg HAP metals OR 0.0011 lb/hr OR 0.0019 lb/hrNEW SOURCE FLOORSProposed Promulgated Proposed Promulgated Proposed Promulgated0.022 lb/ton PM -- -- --OR 0.0066 gr/dscf PM at 7 percent O2 -- -- --OR 0.0032 lb/hr non-Hg HAP metals -- -- ---- 0.018 lb/ton PM 2.0 E-05 lb/ton 2.8 E-05 lb/ton-- OR 0.0014 gr/dscf PM at 17 percent O2 OR 13 μg/dscm at 7 percent O2 OR 6.1 μg/dscm at 17 percent O2-- OR 0.0057 lb/hr non-Hg HAP metals OR 2.4 E-04 lb/hr OR 3.4 E-04 lb/hr-- 0.030 lb/ton PM 2.0 E-04 lb/ton 3.3 E-04 lb/ton-- OR 0.0021 gr/dscf PM at 17 percent O2 OR 70 μg/dscm at 7 percent O2 OR 88 μg/dscm at 17 percent O2-- OR 0.11 lb/hr non-Hg HAP metals OR 0.0011 lb/hr OR 0.0019 lb/hrIf Final included PM subcategories on 12% of the industry, and not 12% of data on hand:12% of industry, QA1 data, ranked onown unit of measurePoolDetermination Limits Notes122 industrywide 0.077 lb/ton PM15 in floor pool OR 0.0069 gr/dscf PM at 17 percent O2 Ranked by PM concOR 0.019 lb/hr non-Hg HAP metals Ranked by HAP lb/hrSmall tunnel kilns(< 10 tph)98 industrywide 0.37 lb/ton PM12 in floor pool OR 0.021 gr/dscf PM at 17 percent O2 Ranked by PM concOR 0.091 lb/hr non-Hg HAP metals Ranked by HAP lb/hr220 industrywide27 in floor pool(225 industrywide at proposal OR 0.014 gr/dscf PM at 17 percent O2 Ranked by PM conc27 in floor pool at proposal) OR 0.057 lb/hr non-Hg HAP metals Ranked by HAP lb/hrAll tunnel kilns0.12 lb/ton PMLarge tunnel kilns(≥10 tph)All tunnel kilnsLarge tunnel kilns(≥10 tph)Small tunnel kilns(< 10 tph)All tunnel kilns---- ----57 lb/hr HCl-equivalentSubcategorySubcategoryLarge tunnel kilns(≥10 tph)Small tunnel kilns(< 10 tph)------57 lb/hr HCl-equivalentTotal non-Hg HAP metals HgAcid gases Total non-Hg HAP metals Hg--57 lb/hr HCl-equivalent 57 lb/hr HCl-equivalentAcid gasesCCEXISTING SOURCE FLOORSDioxins/furans(ng/dscm at 7percent O2)Dioxins/furans(ng/kg)Proposed Promulgated Proposed Promulgated Proposed Promulgated Proposed PromulgatedFloor tile roller kilns 140 140 1.3 E-04 1.3 E-04 0.18 0.13 4.6 2.8Floor tile press dryers -- -- -- -- -- -- 0.19 0.024Floor tile spray dryers -- -- -- -- -- -- 44 19Wall tile roller kilns 140 140 2.0 E-04 2.1 E-04 0.20 0.37 0.17 0.22Wall tile spray dryers -- -- -- -- -- -- 0.12 0.058Tile glaze lines -- -- 1.6 E-04 1.6 E-04 1.9 1.9 -- --First-fire sanitaryware tunnel kilns 140 140 2.6 E-04 2.6 E-04 0.33 0.34 1.5 3.3Sanitaryware manual glazeapplication-- -- -- -- 33 35 -- --Sanitaryware spray machine glazeapplication-- -- -- -- 12 13 -- --Sanitaryware robot glazeapplication-- -- -- -- 8.8 8.9 -- --NEW SOURCE FLOORSDioxins/furans(ng/dscm at 7percent O2)Dioxins/furans(ng/kg)Proposed Promulgated Proposed Promulgated Proposed Promulgated Proposed PromulgatedFloor tile roller kilns 140 140 3.9 E-05 3.9 E-05 0.027 0.037 1.5 1.3Floor tile press dryers -- -- -- -- -- -- 0.19 0.024Floor tile spray dryers -- -- -- -- -- -- 0.17 0.071Wall tile roller kilns 140 140 2.0 E-04 2.1 E-04 0.20 0.37 0.17 0.22Wall tile spray dryers -- -- -- -- -- -- 0.12 0.058Tile glaze lines -- -- 1.6 E-04 1.6 E-04 0.61 0.61 -- --First-fire sanitaryware tunnel kilns 140 140 1.2 E-04 1.3 E-04 0.095 0.095 0.37 0.99Sanitaryware manual glazeapplication-- -- -- -- 3.8 3.9 -- --Sanitaryware spray machine glazeapplication-- -- -- -- 3.2 3.2 -- --Sanitaryware robot glazeapplication-- -- -- -- 2.2 2.3 -- --SubcategorySubcategoryAcid gases (lb/hr HClequivalent)Hg (lb/ton) PM (lb/ton)Acid gases (lb/hr HClequivalent)Hg (lb/ton) PM (lb/ton)