alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-31 Rule13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certifications.

 

 

I, Leah Nivison,certify that:

 

1. I have reviewedthis report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed inrespect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of the GS MortgageSecurities Trust 2012-GC6 (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");

 

2. Based on myknowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not containany untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3. Based on myknowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required tobe provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is includedin the Exchange Act periodic reports;

 

4. Based on myknowledge and the servicer compliance statements required in this report underItem 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Actperiodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under theservicing agreements in all material respects; and

 

5. All of the reportson assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securitiesand their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance withservicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in thisreport in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except asotherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliancedescribed in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

 

In giving thecertifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me bythe following unaffiliated parties:

 

KeyBank NationalAssociation, as Master Servicer, Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, as SpecialServicer, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Trustee, Wells Fargo Bank,National Association, as Custodian, and TriMont Real Estate Advisors, Inc., asOperating Advisor.

 

 

 

Dated: March 25, 2019

 

 

/s/ Leah Nivison

 

 

Chief ExecutiveOfficer

(senior officerin charge of securitization of the depositor)
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

JACOB SULLIVAN,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 38 EM 2018

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 15th day of June , 2018

, the Motion for Leave to File a Short Reply

Brief, the Motion to File Appendix under Seal and Ex Parte , and the Petition for

Extraordinary Jurisdiction are DENIED.
# C_2013140EN.01000901.xml

| 18.5.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 140/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.5.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 140/9

---

Opinion of the Advisory Committee on restrictive agreements and dominant positions given at its meeting of 21 January 2013 regarding a draft decision relating to Case COMP/39.839 (2) — Telefónica and Portugal Telecom

Rapporteur: Latvia

2013/C 140/05

| 1. | The majority of the Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission on the basic amount of the fines. A minority abstains. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The majority of the Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission on the basic amount of the fines. A minority abstains.

| 2. | The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission that there are no aggravating circumstances to be taken into account. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission that there are no aggravating circumstances to be taken into account.

| 3. | The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission that the termination of the infringement on 4 February 2011, 16 days after the opening of proceedings by the Commission, should be taken into account as a mitigating circumstance. |
| --- | --- |

3.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission that the termination of the infringement on 4 February 2011, 16 days after the opening of proceedings by the Commission, should be taken into account as a mitigating circumstance.

| 4. | The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission that there are no mitigating circumstances other than the one indicated under point 3 to be taken into account. |
| --- | --- |

4.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission that there are no mitigating circumstances other than the one indicated under point 3 to be taken into account.

| 5. | The majority of the Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission on the final amount of the fines. A minority abstains. |
| --- | --- |

5.

The majority of the Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission on the final amount of the fines. A minority abstains.

| 6. | The Advisory Committee asks the Commission to take into account any other points raised during the discussion. |
| --- | --- |

6.

The Advisory Committee asks the Commission to take into account any other points raised during the discussion.

| 7. | The Advisory Committee recommends the publication of its opinion in the Official Journal of the European Union. |
| --- | --- |

7.

The Advisory Committee recommends the publication of its opinion in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Official Journal of the European Union

---
H. Res. 23

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

January 19, 1999.

Resolved, That the following named Members, Delegates,

and the Resident Commissioner be, and are hereby, elected

to the following standing committees of the House of Representatives:

COMMITTEE ON AGRICULTURE: Mr. Hill of Indiana.

COMMITTEE ON ARMED SERVICES: Mr. Larson of

Connecticut.

COMMITTEE ON INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS: Mr. Pomeroy of North Dakota, Mr. Delahunt of Massachusetts, Mr.

Meeks of New York, Ms. Lee of California, Mr. Crowley of

New York, and Mr. Hoeffel of Pennsylvania.

COMMITTEE ON SCIENCE: Mr. Weiner of New York and

Mr. Capuano of Massachusetts.
2

•HRES 23 EH

COMMITTEE ON SMALL BUSINESS: Mr. Baird of

Washington and Ms. Schakowsky of Illinois.

Attest:

Clerk.
§ 162.223 Must the rent be adjusted under an agricultural lease? ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (c) of this section, an agricultural lease must provide for one or more rental adjustments if the lease term runs more than five years, unless the lease provides for the payment of: ( 1 ) Less than a fair annual rental, as permitted under § 162.222(b) through (c) of this part; or
( 2 ) A rental based primarily on a share of the agricultural products generated by the lease, or a percentage of the income derived from the sale of agricultural products.
( b ) If rental adjustments are required, the lease must specify: ( 1 ) How adjustments are made;
( 2 ) Who makes the adjustments;
( 3 ) When the adjustments are effective; and
( 4 ) How disputes about the adjustments are resolved.
( c ) An agricultural lease of tribal land may run for a term of more than five years, without providing for a rental adjustment, if the tribe establishes such a policy under § 162.203(b)(4) and negotiates such a lease.
§ 162.575 What are the consent requirements for an assignment of a WSR lease? ( a ) Unless the lease provides otherwise, the lessee must notify all Indian landowners of the proposed assignment.
( b ) The Indian landowners, or their representatives under § 162.013, must consent to an assignment in the same percentages and manner as a new WSR lease under § 162.012, unless the lease: ( 1 ) Provides that individual Indian landowners are deemed to have consented where they do not object in writing to the assignment within a specified period of time following the landowners' receipt of the assignment and the lease meets the requirements of paragraph (c) of this section;
( 2 ) Authorizes one or more representatives to consent to an assignment on behalf of all Indian landowners; or
( 3 ) Designates us as the Indian landowners' representative for the purposes of consenting to an assignment.
( c ) If the lease provides for deemed consent under paragraph (b)(1) of this section, it must require the parties to submit to us: ( 1 ) A copy of the executed assignment or other documentation of any Indian landowners' actual consent;
( 2 ) Proof of mailing of the assignment to any Indian landowners who are deemed to have consented; and
( 3 ) Any other pertinent information for us to review.
( d ) The lessee must obtain the consent of the holders of any bonds or mortgages.
#### § 161.610 What will BIA do if livestock is not removed when a permit expires or is cancelled?

If the livestock is not removed after the expiration or cancellation of a permit, BIA will treat the unauthorized use as a trespass. BIA may remove the livestock on behalf of the Navajo Nation, and pursue any additional remedies available under applicable law, including the assessment of civil penalties and costs under subpart H.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

# Kadena Airmen Tour Naha Air Base, Build Bilateral Relations 

By Senior Airman John Linzmeier

**NAHA AIR BASE, Japan**

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More News/Articles
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-93,337-01

EX PARTE MARQUISHA ANITA WILLIAMS, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 1419632-A IN THE 248TH DISTRICT COURT

FROM HARRIS COUNTY

Per curiam.

O P I N I O N

Applicantwas convicted of aggravated robberyand sentenced to twentyyears’ imprisonment. 

She filed this application for a writ of habeas corpus in the county of conviction, and the district

clerk forwarded it to this Court. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07.

Applicant contends that she was denied her right to an appeal because counsel failed to

timely file a notice of appeal. Based on the record, the trial court has found that counsel failed to

timely file a notice of appeal.

Relief is granted. Ex parte Axel, 757 S.W.2d 369 (Tex. Crim. App. 1988); Jones v. State,

98 S.W.3d 700 (Tex. Crim. App. 2003). Applicant may file an out-of-time appeal of her conviction

in cause number 141963201010 from the 248th District Court of Harris County. Within ten days
2

from the date of this Court’s mandate, the trial court shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. 

If Applicant is indigent and wants to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint counsel

to represent her on direct appeal. Should Applicant decide to appeal, she must file a written notice

of appeal in the trial court within thirty days from the date of this Court’s mandate.

Copies of this opinion shall be sent to theTexasDepartment ofCriminal Justice–Correctional

Institutions Division and the Board of Pardons and Paroles. 

Delivered: March 30, 2022

Do not publish
Con Edison is not in favor of increases in the mandatory efficiency requirements for liquid filled

network distribution transformers.

Con Edison has over 20,000 liquid filled network transformers installed in underground vaults.  

In many cases these units fit with little to no room to spare in the vault.  Also, in areas like Manhattan

where the underground infrastructure is highly congested there is no room to install a new larger vault

or to expand existing vaults.   An increase in the minimum efficiency requirements for liquid filled

transformers will result in an increase in size in the transformer.  For the reasons previously mentioned

this will have an extremely adverse impact on Con Edison’s customers.  In some cases defective

transformers may not be able to be replaced.  In other cases vaults will need to be enlarged or a new

vault will be required.  The average cost to enlarge a vault at Con Edison is $90,000.

   

Con Edison network distribution feeders are subject to backfeed conditions.  A backfeed in a

network is an operating problem. Occasionally, a network protector will fail to open when the feeder is

taken out of service for maintenance work.  When this occurs, the feeder remains alive from the

network although it is deenergized at the supply generating station or substation. Under this condition,

the network secondary mains that supply the backfeeding transformer and the network feeder may

experience an overvoltage condition.  Con Edison installs shunt reactors to limit backfeed overvoltages

to safe values for customer and company equipment.  An increase in network transformer efficiency

may result in lower magnetizing kVA and thus require Con Edison to install additional shunt reactors

where they were not previously required.  The installation cost associated with a new shunt reactor

varies between $400,000 and $590,000.     

The costs outlined above ‐ which would ultimately be passed on to our ratepayers – would far

outweigh any costs savings associated with reduced energy waste and must be considered.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Load Crew Airmen Race Against the Clock 

By Senior Airman Deana Heitzman

 MISAWA AIR BASE, Japan -- Airmen from the 35th Aircraft Maintenance Squadron competed in a quarterly weapons load crew competition here, Dec. 30.

  teams composed of three Airmen raced against the clock, and each other, to arm an F-16 Fighting Falcon with three different weapons systems, all with varying weights and sizes. Both quality and speed were judged the most harshly during the competition, with senior leadership carefully inspecting the arming process for both teams.

  crew competitions, while entertaining, grant aircraft maintenance units an opportunity to showcase the hard work and attention to detail that are part of their day-to-day mission at Misawa. Air Force maintainers are held to a high standard as pilots rely on the enlisted members, some as young as 18 years old, and their expertise to keep the more than 30-year-old aircraft in the sky and in the fight. 

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More News/Aricles
Maytech 60amp opto 400Hz 

Refresh ESC

Cont.Current 60A

Burst Current(10sec) 80A

Net Weight 51g

PCB Size(mm)(L x W x H) 52.5×25.8×14.5

Lipo 2-6Cells

NiMh 5-18Cells

Main Features:

* Extremely low internal resistance.

* Super smooth and accurate throttle linearity.

* Power arming protection: Prevents the motor from accidentally running when switched ON.

* Lost Throttle signal protection:

* The ESC will automatically reduces output power to the motor when it detects a lost of throttle signal for 1 second. A

subsequent loss of throttle signal beyond 3 seconds will cause the ESC automatically to cut power to the motor.

* Safety thermal over-load protection:

* Automatically reduce output power to half when the temperature reaches 110Degrees Celsius, restore output power 

when the temperature is below 110 Degrees Celsius.

* Governor Mode: For Helicopter application.

* With latest humanize software design, especially for all types of brushless motor.

* Parameters programmable function to meet your specific needs.
IV

House Calendar No. 82

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 236

[Report No. 106–215]

Providing for consideration of a concurrent resolution providing for adjournment of the House and Senate for the Independence Day district work

period.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 30, 1999

Mr. REYNOLDS, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

RESOLUTION

Providing for consideration of a concurrent resolution providing for adjournment of the House and Senate for

the Independence Day district work period.

1 Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution

2 it shall be in order, any rule of the House to the contrary

3 notwithstanding, to consider a concurrent resolution pro4 viding for adjournment of the House and Senate for the

5 Independence Day district work period.
House Calendar No. 82

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 236

[Report No. 106–215]

RESOLUTION

Providing for consideration of a concurrent resoluperiod. Senate for the Independence Day district work tion providing for adjournment of the House and

JUNE 30, 1999

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be

printed
### Channel changes of the Gila River in Safford Valley, Arizona, 1846-1970

By: D. E. Burkham

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/pp655G

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 3**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 4**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 5**                            (pdf) 
- NGMDB Index Page:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**                            (html)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

No abstract available.

#### Study Area

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Hometown Auto Retailers, Inc. (the
      "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2006 as filed with
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Corey
      E. Shaker, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.








/s/
      Corey E. Shaker


Corey
      E.
      Shaker


President
      and Chief Executive Officer


May
      12,
      2006
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Office of Thrift Supervision

          - [AC-60: OTS Nos. H-4757, H-4519, and 17971]

                    Notice is hereby given that on February 11, 2011, the Office of Thrift Supervision approved the application of Sunshine Savings MHC, Tallahassee, Florida, the federal mutual holding company for Sunshine Savings Bank, Tallahassee, Florida, to convert to the stock form of organization. Copies of the application are available for inspection by appointment (phone number: 202-906-5922 or e-mail                     *Public.Info@OTS.Treas.gov*) at the Public Reading Room, 1700 G Street, NW., Washington, DC 20552, and the OTS Southeast Regional Office, 1475 Peachtree Street, NE., Atlanta, GA 30309.                

Dated: February 15, 2011.

By the Office of Thrift Supervision.

Sandra E. Evans,

Federal Register Liaison.

[FR Doc. 2011-3901 Filed 2-22-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6720-01-M