alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §7452. Cadets: hazing

(a) Subject to the approval of the Secretary of the Army, the Superintendent of the Academy shall issue regulations—

(1) defining hazing;

(2) designed to prevent that practice; and

(3) prescribing dismissal, suspension, or other adequate punishment for violations.

(b) If a cadet who is charged with violating a regulation issued under subsection (a), the penalty for which is or may be dismissal from the Academy, requests in writing a trial by a general court-martial, he may not be dismissed for that offense except under sentence of such a court.

(c) A cadet dismissed from the Academy for hazing may not be reappointed to the Corps of Cadets, and is ineligible for appointment as a commissioned officer in a regular component of the Army, Navy, Air Force, Marine Corps, or Space Force, until two years after the graduation of his class.

(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 244, §4352; renumbered §7452, Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, §808(c)(1), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1839; amended Pub. L. 116–283, div. A, title IX, §924(c)(1)(A), Jan. 1, 2021, 134 Stat. 3826.)

| Revised section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 4352(a)4352(b) 4352(c) | 10:1163 (1st par.).10:1163 (1st 32 words of last par.).10:1163 (last par., less 1st 32 words). | Mar. 2, 1901, ch. 804 (2d proviso under "Permanent Establishment"); restated Apr. 19, 1910, ch. 174 (38th par. under "Buildings and Grounds"), 36 Stat. 323. |

4352(b)

4352(c)

10:1163 (1st 32 words of last par.).

10:1163 (last par., less 1st 32 words).

In subsection (a), the word "violations" is substituted for the words "infractions of the same". The words "to embody a clear" are omitted as surplusage.

In subsection (b), the words "the penalty for which is or may be" are substituted for the words "which would involve". The words "may not be dismissed for that offense except under sentence of such a court" are substituted for the words "shall be granted".

In subsection (c), the words "a regular component" are inserted, since the source statute historically applied only to the regular components.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2021—Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 116–283 substituted "Marine Corps, or Space Force" for "or Marine Corps".

2018—Pub. L. 115–232 renumbered section 4352 of this title as this section.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2018 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 115–232 effective Feb. 1, 2019, with provision for the coordination of amendments and special rule for certain redesignations, see section 800 of Pub. L. 115–232, set out as a note preceding section 3001 of this title.
STEAM ELECTRIC CBI REPLACEMENT PAGE 

EPA-HQ-OW-2009-0819 

DCN: SE03804

THE FOLLOWING HAS BEEN REMOVED BECAUSE IT 

CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION 

(CBI) PER 40 CFR PART 2, SUBPART B.
Five Steps to 

Safer Health Care

2

4

3

5

1 Ask questions if you have doubts or

concerns.

Ask questions and make sure you understand the answers. Choose a doctor you feel

comfortable talking to. Take a relative or friend with you to help you ask questions and

understand the answers.

Make sure you understand what will

happen if you need surgery.

Make sure you, your doctor, and your surgeon all agree on exactly what will be done during

the operation. Ask your doctor, “Who will manage my care when I am in the hospital?”

Ask your surgeon: Exactly what will you be doing? About how long will it take? What will

happen after the surgery? How can I expect to feel during recovery? Tell the surgeon,

anesthesiologist, and nurses about any allergies, bad reaction to anesthesia, and any

medications you are taking.

Talk to your doctor about which hospital 

is best for your health needs.

Ask your doctor about which hospital has the best care and results for your condition if you

have more than one hospital to choose from. Be sure you understand the instructions you get

about follow-up care when you leave the hospital.

Get the results of any test or procedure.

Ask when and how you will get the results of tests or procedures. Don’t assume the 

results are fine if you do not get them when expected, be it in person, by phone, or by

mail. Call your doctor and ask for your results. Ask what the results mean for your care.

Keep and bring a list of ALL the 

medicines you take.

Give your doctor and pharmacist a list of all the medicines that you take, including nonprescription medicines. Tell them about any drug allergies you have. Ask about side effects

and what to avoid while taking the medicine. Read the label when you get your medicine,

including all warnings. Make sure your medicine is what the doctor ordered and know how

to use it. Ask the pharmacist about your medicine if it looks different than you expected.

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services in partnership with American Hospital Association American Medical Association

Pub No. AHRQ 03-M007
§ 11.1003 Law enforcement officer's duties. A law enforcement officer who takes a minor into custody pursuant to § 11.1002 of this part shall: ( a ) Give the following warnings to any minor taken into custody prior to any questioning: ( 1 ) The minor has a right to remain silent;
( 2 ) Anything the minor says can be used against the minor in court;
( 3 ) The minor has the right to the presence of counsel during questioning; and
( 4 ) If he or she cannot afford counsel, the court will appoint one.
( b ) Release the minor to the minor's parent, guardian, or custodian and issue a verbal advice or warning as may be appropriate, unless shelter care or detention is necessary.
( c ) If the minor is not released, make immediate and recurring efforts to notify the minor's parents, guardian, or custodian to inform them that the minor has been taken into custody and inform them of their right to be present with the minor until an investigation to determine the need for shelter care or detention is made by the court.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. AC11-19-000]

Take notice that on December 17, 2010, T.W. Phillips Pipeline Corp. submitted a request for a waiver of the reporting requirement to file the FERC Form 2-A for 2010 and a waiver of the reporting requirement to file the FERC Form 3-Q for the first, second, and third quarters of 2011.

Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 or 385.214). Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. On or before the comment date, it is not necessary to serve motions to intervene or protests on persons other than the Applicant.

                    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and interventions in lieu of paper using the “eFiling” link at                     *http://www.ferc.gov*. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.                

                    This filing is accessible on-line at                     *http://www.ferc.gov*, using the “eLibrary” link and is available for review in the Commission's Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an “eSubscription” link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail                     *FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov*, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.                

Comment Date: January 31, 2011.

Kimberly Bose,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2011-39 Filed 1-6-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE INDESCO
INTERNATIONAL, INC. FORM 10-Q FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2000 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                             965
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   13,186
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     13,156
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                27,761
<PP&E>                                          80,519
<DEPRECIATION>                                  17,656
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 162,094
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           21,524
<BONDS>                                        162,535
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         5,062
<OTHER-SE>                                    (27,536)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   162,094
<SALES>                                         26,563
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                26,563
<CGS>                                           20,110
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   20,110
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,484
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,143
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,152)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       199
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,351)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 333 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                      October 19, 1999.
    Resolved, That the House disagrees to the Senate amendment to the bill (H.R. 
3064) making appropriations for the government of the District of Columbia and 
other activities chargeable in whole or in part against revenues of said 
District for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2000, and for other purposes, 
and agrees to the conference requested by the Senate thereon.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
§ 170.473 When is a project complete? A project is considered substantially complete when all work is completed and accepted (except for minor tasks yet to be completed (punch list)) and the project is open to traffic. The project is completed only after all the requirements of this section are met. ( a ) At the end of a construction project, the public authority, agency, or organization responsible for the project must make a final inspection. The inspection determines whether the project has been completed in reasonable conformity with the PS&E. ( 1 ) Appropriate officials from the Tribe, BIA, responsible public authority, and FHWA should participate in the inspection, as well as contractors and maintenance personnel.
( 2 ) All project information must be made available during final inspection and used to develop the TTP construction project closeout report. Some examples of project information are: Daily diaries, weekly progress reports, subcontracts, subcontract expenditures, salaries, equipment expenditures, as-built drawings, etc.
( b ) After the final inspection, the facility owner makes final acceptance of the project. At this point, the Tribe or BIA must complete a project closeout and final accounting of all TTP construction project expenditures under § 170.474.
( c ) If applicable, all documents required by 25 CFR part 169 must be completed.
### §2275b. Requirements for appropriate classification guidance.1

(a) In General.—Before a space major defense acquisition program achieves Milestone B approval, or equivalent, the milestone decision authority shall determine whether the classification guidance for the program remains appropriate and—

(1) if such guidance is determined to be appropriate, submit to the congressional defense committees a certification of such determination; or

(2) if such guidance is determined to be inappropriate, initiate an update to such guidance.

(b) Definitions.—In this section:

(1) The term "Milestone B approval" has the meaning given such term in section 4172(e)(7) of this title.

(2) The term "major defense acquisition program" has the meaning given such term in section 4201 of this title.

(3) The term "space major defense acquisition program" means a major defense acquisition program for the acquisition of a satellite, ground system, or command and control system.

(Added Pub. L. 118–31, div. A, title XVI, §1602, Dec. 22, 2023, 137 Stat. 584.)

1 So in original. The period probably should not appear.
# Appendix 10.3

Calculations for Emissions Reductions for Kansas

Reasonable Progress GoalsTable A10.3.1 Calculations of NOxand SO2Reductions from Kansas Sources for Meeting Reasonable GoalsFacility/UnitUnitFuel2002NOx(tons)2002SO2(tons)2002 heatinput(MMBtu)Post-controlNOxrate(lb/MMBtu)1Post-controlSO2rate(lb/MMBtu)1PostcontrolNOx(tons)PostcontrolSO2(tons)NOxreduction(tons)SO2reduction(tons)Proposedcontrols**Westar- Gordon Evans Unit 1** **1 NG/FO 258.7 617.7 1,544,183 0.2745 0.00059 211.9 0.5 46.8 617.2** **Natural gas only.** **2 Westar** **Hutchinson Unit 4** **4 NG/FO 267.1 734.3 1,902,245 0.1667 0.00059 158.5 0.6 108.5 733.7** **Natural gas only.** **2 Westar- Jeffrey** **Unit 3 3 Coal/FO 10,807.4 23,206.0 65,507,710 0.15 0.15 4,** **913.1 4,913.1 5,894.3 18,292.9 Wet** **limestone scrubber** **rebuild, low NOx burner** **system and ESP** **rebuild. Westar** **Lawrence Unit 3 3 Coal/NG 728.4 1,965.4 5,467,803 0.18 --- 1,965.** **4 728.4 0.0 Low NOx** **burner system and** **ESP rebuild.** **Westar Lawrence Unit 4** **4 Coal/NG 1,986.5 1,430.0 11,138,048 0.18 0.15 1,00 2.4 835.4 984.1 594.7** **Low NOx burner** **system, fabric filter** **baghouse and wet** **limestone scrubber** **rebuild. 3** **Westar Lawrence Unit 5** **5 Coal/NG 3,546.3 4,353.7 34,196,132 0.15 0.15 2,56 4.7 2,564.7 981.6 1,789.0** **Low NOx burner** **system, fabric filter** **baghouse and wet** **limestone scrubber** **rebuild. 3** **Westar- Murray Gill Unit 1** **1 NG/FO 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2745 0.00059 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Natural gas** **only. 2** **Westar- Murray Gill Unit 2** **2 NG/FO 4.5 0.0 29,035 0.2745 0.00059 4.0 0.0 0.5 0 .0** **Natural gas only.** **2 Westar- Murray** **Gill Unit 3 3 NG/FO 181.6 452.1 1,082,863 0.2745 0.00059 148.6** **0.3 33.0 451.8 Natural gas** **only. 2** **Westar- Murray Gill Unit 4** **4 NG/FO 103.8 333.3 620,470 0.2745 0.00059 85.2 0.2 18.7 333.1** **Natural gas only.** **2 Westar- Neosho** **Unit 7 7 NG/FO 0.0 0.0 220 0.1667 0.00059 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0** **Natural gas only.** **2 Westar** **Tecumseh Unit 7** **7/9 Coal/NG 1,530.6 2,692.7 7,684,021 0.18 --- 691. 6 2,692.7 839.0 0.0** **Low NOx burner** **system and ESP** **rebuild. Westar** **Tecumseh Unit 8** **8/10 Coal/NG 1,876.9 4,514.9 12,256,920 0.18 --- 1, 103.1 4,514.9 773.8 0.0** **Low NOx burner** **system and ESP** **rebuild.**Totals 10,408.7 22,812.5**1 For coal-fired units, values are proposed 30-day r** **olling average excluding periods of start-up, shutd own and malfunction; for natural ga or fuel oil (NG** **/FO) fired units, original emission factor in lb/MMscf a** **nd converted using 1020 Btu per scf. 2** **Fuel oil firing is allowed in emergencies and duri ng periods of periodic testing of the fuel oil hand** **ling and combustion equipment. 3** **Existing wet limestone scrubber will be rebuilt as necessary to achieve compliance with the proposed** **SO 2** **limitation and to accommodate the installation of a** **fabric filter baghouse. All coal-fired units are tangential boilers.**
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED MARCH 20, 2015

NO. 03-11-00669-CV

Tom Bennett and James B. Bonham Corporation, Appellants

v.

Larry Wayne Grant, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 33RD DISTRICT COURT OF SAN SABA COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE, JUSTICES PEMBERTON AND FIELD

REFORMED AND, AS REFORMED, AFFIRMED ON MOTION FOR REHEARING --

OPINION BY JUSTICE FIELD

This is an appeal from the judgment signed by the trial court on July 13, 2011. We withdraw the 

opinion dated August 13, 2014, and the supplemental opinion and judgment dated September 26, 

2014, and substitute the following opinion and judgment in their place. Having reviewed the 

record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was error in the trial court’s 

judgment, but that such error does not require the judgment to be reversed because Grant has 

filed a remittitur. Therefore, the Court reforms the trial court’s judgment to award Larry Grant 

$512,109 in exemplary damages against Tom Bennett and $512,109 in exemplary damages 

against the James B. Bonham Corporation. The Court affirms the judgment as reformed. Each 

party shall bear his own court costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and in the court 

below.
### Geology of Isla Mona Puerto Rico, and notes on age of Mona Passage

By: C. A. KayeZ. S. Altschuler

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/pp317C

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plate:  **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
- NGMDB Index Page:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**                            (html)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

No abstract available.

#### Study Area

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

# Airmen in Damayan: AF Doc Fortifies Partnerships, Medical Care during Typhoon Relief Efforts

By Senior Airman Marianique Santos36th Wing Public Affairs

                ANDERSEN AIR FORCE BASE, Guam  –              http://www.andersen.af.mil/news/story.asp?id=123375321

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT
#### Martindale et al. *v.*Corbin.

[No. 11,929.

Filed December 19, 1924.]

*Appeal.—Assigned errors*depending; *on evidence not considered when evidence not in*record.—Where the errors relied on for reversal require a consideration of the evidence, appellant’s brief must contain a recital of the evidence, referring to the pages and lines where the evidence may be found, and if it does not, the errors assigned will not be considered.

From Green Circuit Court; *Thomas VanBuskirk,*Judge.

Action between Roy Martindale and others and Thomas I. Corbin. From the judgment rendered, the former appeal.

*Affirmed.*

*Stinkard & Slinkard,*for appellants.

*Guy H. Humphreys*and *W. V. Moffet,*for appellee.

Per Curiam.

The only proper assignment of error relates to the action of the trial court in overruling the motion for a new trial. Each specification in this motion requires a consideration of the evidence. Appellee calls attention to the fact that appellants have not set out a concise statement of the evidence in their brief and insists that no question is presented for our determination. The decisions of the Supreme and this court sustaining appellee's contention as to each specification in the motion for a new trial are numerous and *325decisive. See *Clemens*v. *Stoner, Exr.*(1920), 73 Ind. App. 370; *Pittsburgh, etc., R. Co.*v. *Retz*(1919), 71 Ind. App. 581, 585, 586; *Leedy*v. *Idle, Trustee*(1918), 69 Ind. App. 105, 107; *Webster*v. *Bligh*(1912), 50 Ind. App. 56; *Jeffersonville School Tp.*v. *School City, etc.*(1911), 50 Ind. App. 178, *182; Rose v. City of Jeffersonville*(1916), 185 Ind. 577, 579 ; *McClellan*v. *Thomas*(1915), 183 Ind. 310 ; *Cleveland, etc., R. Co.*v. *Hayes*(1913), 181 Ind. 87, 107 ; *Cleveland, etc., R. Co.*v. *Bowen*(1913), 179 Ind. 142, 145 ; *Huffman*v. *Thompson*(1912), 177 Ind. 366, 368 ; *Washington Hotel Realty Co.*v. *Bedford Stone, etc., Co.*(1924), 195 Ind. 128, 143 N. E. 156 ; *Gary, etc., R. Co.*v. *Hacker*(1915), 58 Ind. App. 618, 620.

Judgment affirmed.