alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-31 Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certification.


  I, John Isbrandtsen, certify that:

  1.I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K/A and all reports on Form 10-D
    required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on
    Form 10-K/A of Sequoia Mortgage Trust 2012-1 (the "Exchange Act periodic
    reports");

  2.Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a
    whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
    to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
    light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
    misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

  3.Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
    information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
    covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

  4.Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required
    in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as
    disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have
    fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreements in all
    material respects; and

  5.All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria
    for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on
    assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed
    securities required to be included in this report in accordance with
    Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18
    have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise
    disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance
    described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form
    10-K/A.

    In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
    information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:
    Cenlar, FSB as Servicer, First Republic Bank as Servicer, PHH Mortgage
    Corporation as Servicer, Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. as Servicer,
    Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. as Custodian and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. as
    Master Servicer and Securities Administrator.

    Dated:   June 27, 2013


    /s/ John Isbrandtsen
    Signature

    Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
    (senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor)
### §12740. Eligibility: denial upon certain punitive discharges or dismissals

A person who—

(1) is convicted of an offense under the Uniform Code of Military Justice (chapter 47 of this title) and whose sentence includes death; or

(2) is separated pursuant to sentence of a court-martial with a dishonorable discharge, a bad conduct discharge, or (in the case of an officer) a dismissal,

is not eligible for retired pay under this chapter.

(Added Pub. L. 104–106, div. A, title VI, §632(a)(1), Feb. 10, 1996, 110 Stat. 365.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Pub. L. 104–106, div. A, title VI, §632(b), Feb. 10, 1996, 110 Stat. 365, provided that: "Section 12740 of title 10, United States Code, as added by subsection (a), shall apply with respect to court-martial sentences adjudged after the date of the enactment of this Act [Feb. 10, 1996]."
U
.S
. Deportment of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration 

# JUN 1 02016
Mr. David K. Campbell Post Office Box 402 Tucker, GA 30085-0402 Dear Mr. Campbell: 800 IndependenceAve. , S.W
. Washington
. DC 20591

This is in response to your commentdated January 13, 2016, postedto the public docket , (No. FAA-2016-0886), petitioningthe Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to assist in changingthe way aircraft weight and balance assessments currently are performed and taught. In yourpetition, you state that several methods for p,erforming weight and balance-the Computational Method, the Graph Method, and the'Table Method-are based on outdated technologies. As a flight instructor, you advocate for a more advanced method, the Spreadsheet Method, which you assert would adequately address the current needs pertinent to aircraft weight and balance. For your petition, there is no pertinent regulation within 14 CFR to amend. The Pilot's Handbook ofAeronautical Knowledge (FAA-H-8083-25A) and the Aircraft Weight and Balance Handbook (FAA-H-8083-lA), along with all otherhandbooks, are guidance material. In accordance with Title 14, Code ofFederal Regulations (14 CFR), 

### § 11.73, the FAA must use the following criteria when making a decision as to whether ornot to amend current regulations based on a petition for rulemaking: l) The immediacy ofthe safety orsecurity concerns you raise; 2) The priority ofother issues the FAA must deal with; and 3) The resources we have available to address these issues. Each year, the FAA prioritizes its projects and resources based on issues that are crucial to the safety ofthe aviation community and thetraveling public to ensurethe FAA delivers the most value to the aviation system. As noted, there is not a regulatory change required. However, we have forwarded yourpetition to the appropriate program office for consideration.Forthe reasons above, we are closing yourpetition for rulemaking in accordance with 14 CFR 

### § 11.73. Sincerely,

Director, Office ofRulemaking 2
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Justice Drug Enforcement Administration
 By Notice dated October 8, 2010, and published in the 
                    **Federal Register**
                     on October 20, 2010, 75 FR 64745, Halo Pharmaceutical Inc., 30 North Jefferson Road, Whippany, New Jersey 07981, made application by renewal to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) to be registered as a bulk manufacturer of the following basic classes of controlled substances: Drug
ScheduleDihydromorphine (9145)
IHydromorphone (9150)
II
 Dihydromorphine is an intermediate in the manufacture of Hydromorphone and is not for commercial distribution. The company plans to manufacture Hydromorphone HCL for sale to other manufacturers and for the manufacture of other controlled substance dosage units for distribution to its customers. No comments or objections have been received. DEA has considered the factors in 21 U.S.C. 823(a) and determined that the registration of Halo Pharmaceutical Inc. to manufacture the listed basic classes of controlled substances is consistent with the public interest at this time. DEA has investigated Halo Pharmaceutical Inc. to ensure that the company's registration is consistent with the public interest. The investigation has included inspection and testing of the company's physical security systems, verification of the company's compliance with state and local laws, and a review of the company's background and history. Therefore, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 823(a), and in accordance with 21 CFR 1301.33, the above named company is granted registration as a bulk manufacturer of the basic classes of controlled substances listed. Dated: February 16, 2011. Joseph T. Rannazzisi, Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement Administration.


[FR Doc. 2011-3924 Filed 2-22-11; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4410-09-P
Exhibit 99.1




Annual Servicer’s Certificate


Provided by Nissan Motor Acceptance Corporation


to Holders of Notes and Certificates









NISSAN MOTOR ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION




OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE




The undersigned, Michael J. McConnell, Vice President of NISSAN MOTOR ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION, a California corporation (the “Company”), does hereby certify, in his capacity as such corporate officer, as follows:




(1)           The undersigned has caused a review, under his supervision, to be made of i) the activities; and ii) the performance under the Agreement (as defined below), of the Company during the 12-month period ended March 31, 2013 (the “Reporting Period”); and




(2)           To the best of the undersigned’s knowledge, based upon such review, the Company has fulfilled its obligations in all material respects under the Agreement throughout the Reporting Period.




This Officer’s Certificate is being furnished pursuant to Section 4.09(a) of that certain Sale and Servicing Agreement, dated as of February 22, 2012 (the “Agreement”), by and among the Company, in its individual capacity and as servicer, Nissan Auto Receivables Corporation II, as seller, and Nissan Auto Receivables 2012-A Owner Trust.




Capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the meanings assigned to such terms in the Agreement.




IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have set my hand effective as of the 24th day of June, 2013.




/s/Michael J. McConnell________________


Michael J. McConnell


Vice President
**Exhibit
      32.1**





Certification
      Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.
§1350)





I,
      Thomas
      W. Martin, Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President of ICON Capital
      Corp., the General Partner of the Registrant in connection with the Quarterly
      Report of ICON Income Fund Eight A L.P. (the "Partnership") on Form 10-Q/A
      for
      the period ended September 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
      Commission on the date hereof (the "Quarterly Report") certify, pursuant to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my
      knowledge:





1.
            The
                Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                13(a) or
                15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. §78m);
                and





2.
            The
                information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in
                all
                material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
                of
                the Partnership.








*Dated:
      December 11, 2007*





*/s/
      Thomas W. Martin*


Thomas
      W.
      Martin


Chairman,
      Chief Executive Officer and President of the General Partner


(Principal
      Executive Officer)


ICON
      Capital Corp.


General
      Partner of ICON Income Fund Eight A L.P.
A Federal Advisory Committee for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s Office of Research and Development

January 19, 2010

43rd EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE FACE-TO-FACE MEETING

DRAFT AGENDA

February 4 - 5, 2010

Marriott at Metro Center

775 12th Street, NW

 Washington, DC 20005

Phone: (202) 737-2200

Thursday, February 4, 2010

8:30 a.m. – 9:00 a.m. Registration 

9:00 a.m. – 9:15 a.m. Welcome and Introductions Dr. Gary S. Sayler, Chair,

- Review of September Executive Committee

Meeting Minutes

- Overview of Agenda 

9:15 a.m. – 9:30 a.m. BOSC DFO Remarks Mr. Greg Susanke, Designated 

- Administrative Issues Federal Officer (DFO), Office 

of Research and Development 

(ORD)

9:30 a.m. – 10:00 a.m. ORD Update Dr. Kevin Teichman, Deputy 

Assistant Administrator for 

Science for ORD

10:00 a.m. – 10:30 a.m. AA/ORD Remarks Dr. Paul Anastas, Assistant 

Administrator for ORD

10:30 a.m. – 10:45 a.m. Break

10:45 a.m. – 11:00 a.m. Subcommittee Updates

- Drinking Water Program Review Dr. Chuck Haas, 

Subcommittee Chair

- Global Change Program Review Dr. Henry Falk, 

Subcommittee Vice Chair

11:00 a.m. – 12:00 p.m. Computational Toxicology Dr. Dennis Paustenbach, Chair,

Letter Report CompTox Subcommittee

- Presentation 

- Discussion
Draft Agenda for February 4 - 5, 2010 Executive Committee Meeting

 2

12:00 p.m. – 1:00 p.m. Lunch

1:00 p.m. – 1:30 p.m. EPA Science Advisory Board Dr. Vanessa Vu, 

(SAB) Activities Director SAB

1:30 p.m. – 2:30 p.m. Decision Analysis Workgroup Report Dr. Katherine von Stackelberg,

Workgroup Chair, Executive 

Committee

2:30 p.m. – 2:45 p.m. Break

2:45 p.m. – 3:15 p.m. Internal Office of Science Policy Dr. Lawrence Martin, OSP, 

(OSP) Assessment of BOSC Research ORD

Program Reviews

3:15 p.m. – 3:45 p.m. Program Review Process: Mr. Greg Susanke, DFO, ORD

Recommendations and Changes

3:45 p.m. – 4:30 p.m. Subcommittee Charge Question Mr. Greg Susanke, DFO, ORD

Revisions

4:30 p.m. – 5:00 p.m. BOSC Guidance for Development Mr. Greg Susanke, DFO, ORD

of Program Review Reports and 

Mid-Cycle Review Reports

5:00 p.m. Recess

Friday, February 5, 2010

8:30 a.m. – 9:30 a.m. ORD Response to Clean Air Report Dr. Dan Costa, 

National Program Director, 

Clean Air Research Program

9:30 a.m. – 10:30 a.m. Executive Committee Open Forum: Dr. Gary Sayler, Chair,

Roles and Issues Executive Committee

10:30 a.m. – 10:45 a.m. Public Comment

10:45 a.m. – 11:00 a.m. Break

11:00 a.m. – 12:00 p.m. Future Discussion/Future Business Dr. Gary Sayler, Chair, 

- EC Meetings in 2010 Executive Committee

- Future Work

12:00 p.m. Adjourn
IV

House Calendar No. 91

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 257

[Report No. 106–247]

Providing for the consideration of the bill (H.R. 2561) making appropriations

for the Department of Defense for the fiscal year ending September

30, 2000, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 21, 1999

Mrs. MYRICK, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution;

which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

RESOLUTION

Providing for the consideration of the bill (H.R. 2561) making appropriations for the Department of Defense for

the fiscal year ending September 30, 2000, and for other

purposes.

1 Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this

2 resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of

3 rule XVIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee

4 of the Whole House on the state of the Union for consider5 ation of the bill (H.R. 2561) making appropriations for

6 the Department of Defense for the fiscal year ending Sep-
2

HRES 257 RH

1 tember 30, 2000, and for other purposes. All points of

2 order against consideration of the bill are waived. General

3 debate shall be confined to the bill and shall not exceed

4 one hour equally divided and controlled by the chairman

5 and ranking minority member of the Committee on Appro6 priations. After general debate the bill shall be considered

7 for amendment under the five-minute rule. Points of order

8 against provisions in the bill for failure to comply with

9 clause 2 of rule XXI are waived. During consideration of

10 the bill for amendment, the Chairman of the Committee

11 of the Whole may accord priority in recognition on the

12 basis of whether the Member offering an amendment has

13 caused it to be printed in the portion of the Congressional

14 Record designated for that purpose in clause 8 of rule

15 XVIII. Amendments so printed shall be considered as

16 read. The chairman of the Committee of the Whole may:

17 (1) postpone until a time during further consideration in

18 the Committee of the Whole a request for a recorded vote

19 on any amendment; and (2) reduce to five minutes the

20 minimum time for electronic voting on any postponed

21 question that follows another electronic vote without inter22 vening business, provided that the minimum time for elec23 tronic voting on the first in any series of questions shall

24 be 15 minutes. At the conclusion of consideration of the

25 bill for amendment the Committee shall rise and report
3

HRES 257 RH

1 the bill to the House with such amendments as may have

2 been adopted. The previous question shall be considered

3 as ordered on the bill and amendments thereto to final

4 passage without intervening motion except one motion to

5 recommit with or without instructions.

House Calendar No. 91

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 257

[Report No. 106–247]

RESOLUTION

Providing for the consideration of the bill (H.R.

30, 2000, and for other purposes.of Defense for the fiscal year ending September2561) making appropriations for the Department

JULY 21, 1999

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be

printed
#### § 173.20 Revocation of permits.

Any permit issued pursuant to this part may be revoked at any time within the discretion of the Secretary. Agricultural and grazing leases dealt with in § 173.17 shall be subject to cancellation as provided for in the respective parts 162 and 166 of this chapter, and the conditions of the instruments executed pursuant thereto.
§ 169.104 What is the release process for a bond or alternative form of security? Upon satisfaction of the requirements for which the bond was security, or upon expiration, termination, or cancellation of the right-of-way, the grantee may ask BIA in writing to release all or part of the bond or alternative form of security and release the grantee from the obligation to maintain insurance. Upon receiving the grantee's request, BIA will: ( a ) Confirm with the tribe, for tribal land or, where feasible, with the Indian landowners for individually owned Indian land, that the grantee has complied with all applicable grant obligations; and
( b ) Release all or part of the bond or alternative form of security to the grantee, unless we determine that the bond or security must be redeemed to fulfill the contractual obligations.
§ 162.515 How must a WEEL address ownership of permanent improvements? ( a ) A WEEL must specify who will own any permanent improvements the lessee installs during the lease term. In addition, the WEEL must indicate whether any permanent improvements the lessee installs: ( 1 ) Will remain on the premises upon expiration, termination, or cancellation of the lease whether or not the WEEL is followed by a WSR lease, in a condition satisfactory to the Indian landowners;
( 2 ) May be conveyed to the Indian landowners during the WEEL term and under what conditions the permanent improvements may be conveyed;
( 3 ) Will be removed within a time period specified in the WEEL, at the lessee's expense, with the leased premises to be restored as closely as possible to their condition before installation of the permanent improvements; or
( 4 ) Will be disposed of by other specified means.
( b ) A WEEL that requires the lessee to remove the permanent improvements must also provide the Indian landowners with an option to take possession and title to the permanent improvements if the improvements are not removed within the specified time period.
#### State of Nebraska, appellee, v. Bill Hilderbrand, appellant.

226 N. W. 2d 353

Filed February 27, 1975.

No. 39702.

*234Wade H. Ellis, for appellant.

Clarence A. H. Meyer, Attorney General, and Marilyn B. Hutchinson, for appellee.

Heard before White, C. J., Spencer, Boslaugh, McCown, Newton, Clinton, and Brodkey, JJ.

Boslaugh, J.

The defendant was sentenced to imprisonment for 2 to 6 years for possession of a forged check with intent to defraud. He has appealed and contends the sentencing procedure was erroneous and the sentence was excessive.

The check involved in this case was for $20. It was dated August 16, 1971, and drawn on the account of Webb Richard in the Bank of Hyannis. The check was cashed at Ranchland Conoco of Hyannis, Nebraska.

The defendant was originally charged with uttering the forged check. On September 27, 1973, the defendant was arraigned before Judge Stuart. The information was amended at that time to charge possession of a forged check. The defendant entered a plea of guilty and his bond was continued. On November 17, 1973, the defendant was notified to appear for sentencing on December 27, 1973.

On December 26, 1973, the defendant was arrested in Oklahoma for driving while intoxicated. When the defendant failed to appear for sentencing a bench warrant was issued. After completing his sentence in Oklahoma, the defendant waived extradition and was returned to Nebraska. Sentence was imposed on May 22, 1974, by Judge Windrum. There is no requirement that the ar*235raignment and the sentencing hearing be conducted by the same District Judge.

After accepting the defendant’s plea of guilty on September 27, 1973, the trial court .ordered a presentence report be prepared by the district probation office. A report dated November 9, 1973, was prepared by the chief adult probation officer and a copy of the report was forwarded with the record in this case as provided in Rule 7h of the Rules of the Supreme Court, 1974. The record shows the report was available at the time of the sentencing hearing and was examined by both the trial court and counsel for the defendant. Contrary to the contention of the defendant, the record shows compliance with section 29-2261, R. S. Supp., 1972, and State v. Jackson, 192 Neb. 39, 218 N. W. 2d 430.

Section 28-602, R. R. S. 1943, provides a penalty of imprisonment for 6 months to 10 years and a fine of not to exceed $1,000 for possession of a forged instrument. The defendant has a conviction record of at least 5 felonies and 13 misdemeanors, including some crimes of violence. Under these circumstances the sentence was not excessive.

The judgment of the District Court is affirmed.

Affirmed.

McCown, J.,

dissenting as to sentence.

To sentence an alcoholic to 2 to 6 years imprisonment for possession of a forged $20 check, in my opinion, is excessive. It may be appropriate to repeat the comment that the punishment does not fit the crime although it may fit the defendant.
§ 170.451 Can TTP funds be used for archeological and environmental compliance? Yes. For approved TTP projects, TTP funds can be used for environmental and archeological work consistent with § 170.450 and applicable Tribal laws for: ( a ) Road and bridge rights-of-way;
( b ) Borrow pits and aggregate pits and water sources associated with TTP activities staging areas;
( c ) Limited mitigation outside of the construction limits as necessary to address the direct impacts of the construction activity as determined in the environmental analysis and after consultation with all affected Tribes and appropriate Secretaries; and
( d ) Construction easements.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

# Experiencing a Ride on the Marine Corps Osprey Firsthand

By Shimabukuro YoshikazuIII Marine Expeditionary Force / Marine Corps Installations Pacific

                NAGO, Japan  –              

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

Marine Corps Osprey

pacom

news

articles