alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 11.1112 Dispositional alternatives. ( a ) If a minor has been adjudged a minor-in-need-of-care, the children's court may: ( 1 ) Permit the minor to remain with his or her parents, guardian or custodian subject to such limitations and conditions as the court may prescribe; or, if reasonable efforts to have the minor return or remain in his or her own home are unsuccessful, the children's court may make whichever of the following dispositions is in the best interest of the minor;
( 2 ) Place the minor with a relative within the boundaries of the reservation subject to such limitations and conditions as the court may prescribe;
( 3 ) Place the minor in a foster home within the boundaries of the reservation which has been approved by the tribe subject to such limitations and conditions as the court may prescribe;
( 4 ) Place the minor in shelter care facilities designated by the court;
( 5 ) Place the minor in a foster home or a relative's home outside the boundaries of the reservation subject to such limitations and conditions as the court may prescribe; or
( 6 ) Recommend that termination proceedings begin.
( b ) Whenever a minor is placed in a home or facility located outside the boundaries of the reservation, the court may require the party receiving custody of the minor to sign an agreement that the minor will be returned to the court upon order of the court.
( c ) The dispositional orders are to be in effect for the time limit set by the children's court, but no order may continue after the minor reaches 18 years of age, unless the dispositional order was made within six months of the minor's eighteenth birthday, in which case the disposition may not continue for more than six months.
( d ) The dispositional orders are to be reviewed at the children's court discretion, but at least once every six months to determine the continuing need for and appropriateness of placement, to determine the extent of progress made, and to assess the probability of the minor's return to his or her home.
( e ) A permanency planning hearing must be held within 18 months after the original placement and every six months thereafter to determine the future status of the minor except when the minor is returned to his or her home and court supervision ceases.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of OMI Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the Quarter ending March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Kathleen C. Haines, Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

| | 1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements
of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                              
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | 2) | The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
of the Company.
|

|      |                         |  |     |     |                        
|----- | ----------------------- |  | --- | --- | -----------------------
|      |                         |  |     |     |                        
|      |                         |  |     |     |                        
|      |                         |  |     |     |                        
|Date: | May
            9, 2006 |  | By: | /s/ | Kathleen
    C. Haines 
|      |                         |  |     |     | Kathleen C. Haines     
|      |                         |  |     |     | Senior Vice President, 
|      |                         |  |     |     | Chief Financial Officer
|      |                         |  |     |     | and Treasurer          







A signed original of this statement required by Section 906 has been provided to OMI Corporation and will be retained by OMI Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its Staff upon
      request.

---
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32

                                 CERTIFICATION

      We, Roy G. Warren, Chief Executive Officer and Tommy Kee, Chief Accounting
Officer, of Bravo! Foods International Corp. (the "Company"), certify, pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

      1. The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarter
ended June 30, 2006 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and

      2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: September 11 2006

[Signature]
Roy G. Warren
Chief Executive Officer

[Signature]
Tommy E. Kee
Chief Accounting Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
    
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         1061554                     
<NAME>                        Voxcom Holdings, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                    1
<CURRENCY>                                      US DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                  OCT-1-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                          1
<CASH>                                               8,951
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      830,493
<ALLOWANCES>                                       100,000
<INVENTORY>                                        546,218
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,794,899
<PP&E>                                             154,054
<DEPRECIATION>                                      61,369
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   2,878,730
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              737,270
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                     11,355,000
<COMMON>                                               724
<OTHER-SE>                                     (9,214,264)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     2,878,730
<SALES>                                            392,158
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   392,158
<CGS>                                              139,170
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,248,874
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   100,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  26,585
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,022,471)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,022,471)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   (558,793)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,581,264)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        (.23)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (.23)
        



</TABLE>
### §3011. Definitions incorporated from title 41

In any chapter 137 legacy provision, the following terms have the meanings provided such terms in chapter 1 of title 41:

(1) The term "procurement".

(2) The term "procurement system".

(3) The term "standards".

(4) The term "full and open competition".

(5) The term "responsible source".

(6) The term "item".

(7) The term "item of supply".

(8) The term "supplies".

(9) The term "commercial product".

(10) The term "commercial service".

(11) The term "nondevelopmental item".

(12) The term "commercial component".

(13) The term "component".

(Added and amended Pub. L. 116–283, div. A, title XVIII, §1806(b)(1), (2), Jan. 1, 2021, 134 Stat. 4153.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

The text of par. (3) of section 2302 of this title, which was transferred to this section and amended by Pub. L. 116–283, §1806(b)(2), was based on Pub. L. 103–355, title I, §1502(1), Oct. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 3296; Pub. L. 104–106, div. D, title XLIII, §4321(b)(3), Feb. 10, 1996, 110 Stat. 672; Pub. L. 111–350, §5(b)(8), Jan. 4, 2011, 124 Stat. 3842; Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, §836(c)(1), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1864.

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 3011 was renumbered section 7011 of this title.

Another prior section 3011 was renumbered section 7012 of this title.

#### Amendments

2021—Pub. L. 116–283, §1806(b)(2), transferred par. (3) of section 2302 of this title to this section, realigned margin, struck out par. (3) designation at beginning, substituted "In any chapter 137 legacy provision, the following" for "The following" in introductory provisions, and redesignated subpars. (A) to (M) as pars. (1) to (13), respectively.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section and amendment by Pub. L. 116–283 effective Jan. 1, 2022, with additional provisions for delayed implementation and applicability of existing law, see section 1801(d) of Pub. L. 116–283, set out as an Effective Date of 2021 Amendment note preceding section 3001 of this title.
CERTIFICATIONS  I, Frank Oakes, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Stellar Biotechnologies Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4. The Companys other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the Company and have:  a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principals;  c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  d) Disclosed in this report any change in the Companys internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting; and  5. The Companys other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Companys auditors and the audit committee of the Companys board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Companys internal control over financial reporting.  Date: January 15, 2013   By: /s/  "Frank Oakes"   Frank Oakes President and CEO
#### § 1000.81 What is an annual funding agreement (AFA)?

Annual funding agreements are legally binding and mutually enforceable written agreements negotiated and entered into annually between a self-governance Tribe/Consortium and BIA.
§ 115.814 If a tribe withdraws money from its trust account for a particular purpose or project, may the tribe redeposit any money that was not used for its intended purpose? A tribe may redeposit funds not used for a particular purpose or project if: ( a ) The funds were withdrawn in accordance with: ( 1 ) The terms of Trust Reform Act;
( 2 ) The terms of the legislative settlement; or
( 3 ) The terms of a judgment use and distribution plan; and
( b ) The tribe can provide documentation showing the source of the funds to be redeposited.
#### The People of the State of New York, Appellant, *v.*George B. McClellan, Respondent, Impleaded with William R. Hearst, Defendant.

First Department,

March 6, 1908.

Trial — special jury ordered — appeal — power of Appellate Division to grant relief under general prayer.

An action involving the validity of the election of the mayor of the city óf Méw ■ York and.turning upon questions of fact is of such grave importance that it should be tried before a special jury under the provisions of chapter 602 of the Daws of 1901, as amended by chapter 458- of the Laws-of, 1904, rather than before a struck jury."

Where a notice of motion for an order for a struck jury asks for." such other and further relief as to the court may seem just,” the Appellate Division may order a trial before a special-jury without remitting the case to the Special Term.

Appeal by the plaintiff, The-'People of the State of Mew York, from an order' of the Supreme Court, made at the Mew York Special Term and entered in the office of the1 clerk of the county of Mew.York on the 25th day of January, 1908, granting,the motion of the defendant George B.. McClellan that the issues be tried by a struck jury.

*Clarence J. Skearn,*for the appellant.

*■Eugene Lamb Richards, Jr.,*for the respondent.

Per Curiam:

This is, as was well said by the court below, a case of the gravest •importance. Mot only does it involve the title to the. principal *665administrative office of the city, but it is quite probable that its decision will turn upon questions of fact. For' these reasons it is proper that it should be tried before a jury specially selected. We. consider, however, that an impartial and satisfactory jury can be more surely and speedily obtained by a resort to the special jury panel provided for by chapter 602 of the Laws of 1901, as amended by chapter 458 of the Laws of 1904, than by an attempt to procure a struck jury. *(Jerome*v. *New York Evening Journal Pub. Co.,*124 App. Div. 372.) The notice of motion asked for an order for a struck jury, and “ for such other and further relief as to the court may seem just.” It is unnecessary, therefore, to send the case back to the Special Term.

The order appealed from will, therefore, be modified, without costs, so. as to direct that the trial be had before a jury to be drawn from the special jury list. The number of jurors, the time when the drawing shall take place, and the term of the court and the particular day of the term when such special jury must attend will be fixed by the order to be entered hereon, which must be settled on notice.

Present -- Patterson, P. J., Ingraham, McLaughlin, Olarke and Scott, JJ.

Order modified as directed in opinion, without costs; order to be entered as therein indicated. Settle order on notice:
2 

• • 

cc: Hon. Elizabeth Goff Gonzalez, District Judge 

Frank Peter Estrada, Jr. 

Attorney General/Carson City 

Clark County District Attorney 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

(0) 1947A
### **CHAPTER 1606—EDUCATIONAL ASSISTANCE FOR MEMBERS OF THE SELECTED RESERVE**

Sec.
16131.
Educational assistance program: establishment; amount.
16131a.
Accelerated payment of educational assistance.
16132.
Eligibility for educational assistance.
16132a.
Authority to transfer unused education benefits to family members.
16133.
Time limitation for use of entitlement.
16134.
Termination of assistance.
16135.
Failure to participate satisfactorily; penalties.
16136.
Administration of program.
[16137.
Repealed.]

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**2011**—Pub. L. 112–81, div. A, title X, §1061(29)(B), Dec. 31, 2011, 125 Stat. 1584, struck out item 16137 "Biennial report to Congress".

**2008**—Pub. L. 110–252, title V, §5006(e)(2), June 30, 2008, 122 Stat. 2386, added item 16132a.

Pub. L. 110–181, div. A, title V, §528(a)(2), Jan. 28, 2008, 122 Stat. 107, added item 16131a.

**1999**—Pub. L. 106–65, div. A, title V, §548(b), Oct. 5, 1999, 113 Stat. 609, substituted "Biennial report to Congress" for "Reports to Congress" in item 16137.

**1996**—Pub. L. 104–106, div. A, title XV, §1501(b)(33), Feb. 10, 1996, 110 Stat. 498, substituted "limitation" for "limitations" in item 16133.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Office of the Secretary

                    The following Applications for Certificates of Public Convenience and Necessity and Foreign Air Carrier Permits were filed under Subpart B (formerly Subpart Q) of the Department of Transportation's Procedural Regulations (                    *See*14 CFR 301.201*et seq.*). The due date for Answers, Conforming Applications, or Motions to Modify Scope are set forth below for each application. Following the Answer period DOT may process the application by expedited procedures. Such procedures may consist of the adoption of a show-cause order, a tentative order, or in appropriate cases a final order without further proceedings.                

*Docket Number:*                     DOT-OST-2006-24629.                

*Date Filed:*                     January 18, 2011.                

*Due Date for Answers, Conforming Applications, or Motion to Modify Scope:*                     Febuary 8, 2011.                

*Description:*                     Application of Yangtze River Express Airlines Co., Ltd. requesting an exemption and amended foreign air carrier permit authorizing it to engage in charter foreign air transportation of property and mail between a point or points in the People's Republic of China, on the one hand, and a point or points in the United States, on the other hand; and a statement of authorization for 54 one-way third/fourth freedom cargo charter flights on a Shanghai (PVG)—Qingdao, China (TAO)—Los Angeles (LAX)—Shanghai (PVG) routing.                

Renee V. Wright,

Program Manager, Docket Operations, Federal Register Liaison.

[FR Doc. 2011-3976 Filed 2-22-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-9X-P
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# USINDOPACOM Statement on DPRK Missile Launch

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command Public Affairs

We are aware of the DPRK’s ballistic missile launch and are consulting closely with the Republic of Korea and Japan, as well as other regional allies and partners. The United States condemns these actions and calls on the DPRK to refrain from further unlawful and destabilizing acts.  While we have assessed that this event does not pose an immediate threat to U.S. personnel, or territory, or to our allies, we continue to monitor the situation. The U.S. commitments to the defense of the ROK and Japan remain ironclad.

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT