alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I, Roland Vetter, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of QuadTech
International, Inc. for the quarter ended April 30, 2007;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control
over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(f)) for the small business issuer and have:

(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer is made
known to us by others, particularly during the period in which this annual
report is being prepared;

(b) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure
controls and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by
this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small
business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth
fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or
is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting; and

5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit
committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions);

(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting.

June 14, 2007

|"Signed JR
    Vetter"J. Roland Vetter
    Chief Financial Officer
|------------------------------------------------------------------
IV

House Calendar No. 118

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 307

[Report No. 106–345]

Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the

bill (H.R. 2606) making appropriations for foreign operations, export

financing, and related programs for the fiscal year ending September

30, 2000, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 28, 1999

Mr. DIAZ-BALART, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be

printed

RESOLUTION

Waiving points of order against the conference report to

accompany the bill (H.R. 2606) making appropriations

for foreign operations, export financing, and related programs for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2000,

and for other purposes.

1 Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it

2 shall be in order to consider the conference report to ac3 company the bill (H.R. 2606) making appropriations for

4 foreign operations, export financing, and related programs
2

HRES 307 RH

1 for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2000, and for

2 other purposes. All points of order against the conference

3 report and against its consideration are waived. The con4 ference report shall be considered as read.

House Calendar No. 118

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 307

[Report No. 106–345]

RESOLUTION

Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the bill (H.R. 2606) making

appropriations for foreign operations, export financing, and related programs for the fiscal yearending September 30, 2000, and for other purposes.

SEPTEMBER 28, 1999

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be

printed
#### § 150.102 Who maintains the record of title?

The LTRO is designated as the office responsible for maintaining the record of title.
March 6, 2001



Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20549

         Re:      Transamerica Occidental Life Insurance Company and
                  Transamerica Occidental Life Separate Account
                  VL (File No. 33-2022)

Dear Commissioner:

On behalf of Transamerica Occidental Life Insurance Company and Transamerica
Occidental Life Separate Account VL ("separate account"), incorporated by
reference is the annual report for the underlying fund, the EQ Advisers Trust,
for filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission, pursuant to Rule 30b2-1
under the Investment Company Act of 1940 ("Act").

         Filer/Entity:              EQ Advisers Trust
         File #:                    811-07953
         CIK #:                     0001027263
         Accession #:               0000950136-01-000411
         Date of Filing:            3-5-2001

This annual report is for the period ending December 31, 2000, and has been
transmitted to contract holders in accordance with Rule 30d-2 under the Act.

If you have any questions regarding this filing, please contact the undersigned
at (213) 742-3126.

Very truly yours,



Susan Vivino
Second Vice President and
Assistant Secretary

cc:      F. Bellamy, Esq.
         R. Fink, Esq.
Docket Number FAA-2014-0176
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# U.S. Coast Guard Crew Sequoia Returns from Western, Central Pacific Fisheries Deployment

By  Chief Petty Officer Sara MooersU.S. Coast Guard District 14 Hawaii

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More Articles/News
#### § 1000.93 May the Secretary place any requirements on programs and funds that are otherwise available to Tribes/Consortia or Indians for which appropriations are made to agencies other than DOI?

No, unless the Secretary is required to develop terms and conditions that are required by law or that are required by the agency to which the appropriation is made.
### TEXA S C OU R T OF A PPEAL S, THIR D DIST R ICT , AT AU STIN NO. 03-0 8 -00 339 -CV Bla st r o, Inc . d/ b/aBla st r o. Co m , A ppe lla nt

v. Data F ound ry, Inc., f/k/a Texas.Net, Inc., f/k/ a Texas Networki ng, In c. , Appellee F ROM THE DISTRICT CO URT OF TRAVIS COUNTY , 53RD JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. D-1- GN-04- 0019 37 , HO NORAB LE GUS J. STRAUSS, JR. , JUDGE PRESIDI NG

M E MO R

A N D UM O P I N I O N The pa rties to this appea l have filed a joint motion t o vacate the trial c ourt’s judg ment and dismiss thi s case . We gr ant the motion, vacate t he judgment wit hout refe renc e to the mer its, and dismiss this case. See Tex. R. App. P . 42.1(a) , 43.2(e) .

__________________________________________ Diane M. H enson, Jus tice Be fore Chief J ustice Jones, J ustices Puryear and He nson Vac ated a nd Dismissed Filed: F ebrua

ry 18, 2009
156 So.2d 379

#### Ex parte James E. RUFFIN.

3 Div. 92.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

Sept. 5, 1963.

See also 41 Ala.App. 560, 140 So.2d 294.

James E. Ruffin, pro ami.

Richmond M. Flowers, Atty. Gen., and David W. Clark, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.

COLEMAN, Justice.

Petitioner has filed in this court an original petition which is styled "RE-APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS, IN FORMA PAUPERIS.” The petition contains the following recital:

> “3. PETITIONER AVERS THAT THIS IS A RE-APPLICATION OF A PETITION HEARD BY JUDGE EUGENE CARTER, OF THE FIFTEENTH (15) JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF ALABAMA, IN HIS CHAMBERS ON JULY 10, 1963.”

The quoted recital shows that petitioner seeks to review, by original petition, the action of the circuit court denying relief on the same petition heard in that court.

Any party aggrieved by the judgment on the trial of a habeas corpus may appeal to the supreme court, or court of appeals. § 369, Title 15, Code 1940. Ex parte Taylor, ante, p. 346, 155 So.2d 299.

Where an appeal may be-taken as prescribed by § 369, Title 15, Code 1940, this court, in the absence of unusual circumstances, will not entertain an original petition for writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte Lee, ante, p. 343, 155 So.2d 296.

The instant petition shows on its face that petitioner could have taken, an appeal as prescribed by § 369, Title. 15. In that circumstance, without more, the supreme court will not entertain the instant petition and the state’s motion to strike the petition is due to be granted. Ex parte Carmack, ante, p. 347, 155 So.2d 300.

The foregoing discussion is based on matters appearing on the face of the petition. Other matters appear in petitioner’s reply to the state’s motion to strike the petition. In his reply petitioner states that he “ * * on, to-wit, February 27, 1962, tried the so-called other remedy of appeal in Title 15, Sec. 369, to no avail.” See Ruffin v. State, 41 Ala.App. 560, 140 So.2d 294. Thus it seems that petitioner has already enjoyed at least one review, by appeal, of Judge Carter’s action in denying petitioner’s release in a habeas corpus proceeding where he complained of conviction for escape. He is not entitled to prosecute the instant petition under the circumstances which he has shown.

Petition stricken.

LIVINGSTON, C. J, and SIMPSON and GOODWYN, JJ., concur.
IV

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 25

Congratulating the Government of Peru and the Government of Ecuador

for signing a peace agreement ending a border dispute which has resulted

in several military clashes over the past 50 years.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 19, 1999

Mr. GALLEGLY submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on International Relations

RESOLUTION

Congratulating the Government of Peru and the Government

of Ecuador for signing a peace agreement ending a border dispute which has resulted in several military clashes

over the past 50 years.

Whereas the Governments of Peru and Ecuador have been

engaged in a serious border dispute dating as far back

as Spanish colonial times;

Whereas the Rio Protocol signed in 1942 between Peru and

Ecuador, and guaranteed by 4 nations including the

United States, failed to settle the dispute;

Whereas Peru and Ecuador have gone to war 3 times over

the border areas with the most recent clashes taking

place in 1995 resulting in dozens of deaths on both sides;

and
2

•HRES 25 IH

Whereas the Governments of Peru and Ecuador recently

completed long and difficult negotiations and reached a

final settlement of the dispute on October 26, 1998: Now,

therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives—

2 (1) congratulates the Governments of Peru and

3 Ecuador for ending the border dispute between their

4 two countries which has been a source of armed con5 flict for over 50 years;

6 (2) commends the Presidents of both nations

7 for personally becoming involved in the negotiations

8 and for reaching this historic agreement;

9 (3) recognizes the commitment of the Presi10 dents of the guarantor nations of Argentina, Brazil,

11 and Chile, along with the United States, in seeking

12 a viable solution to the border dispute;

13 (4) urges both the Governments of Peru and

14 Ecuador to honor the border settlement and to co15 operate with each other in bringing peace, stability,

16 and economic development to the troubled area; and

17 (5) reaffirms the commitment of the United

18 States to support both governments in the imple19 mentation of the border agreement.

Æ
§ 20.305 What is redetermination? Redetermination is an evaluation by a social services worker to assess the need for continued financial assistance as outlined in § 20.304. It includes: ( a ) A home visit;
( b ) An estimate of income, living circumstances, household composition for the month(s) for which financial assistance is to be provided; and
( c ) Appropriate revisions to the case plan and the ISP.
**EXHIBIT
      32**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C., ss.1350 AS ADOPTED**


**PURSUANT
      TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Genmed Holding Corp. (the
      "Company") for the quarter ended September 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned Chief
      Executive Officer, President, Treasurer, and the principal financial officer
      of
      the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents in all material respects
      the
      financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:
                November 19, 2008
            /s/
                Erwin R. BouwensErwin
                R. Bouwens, Chief Executive Officer and
                President
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of SkyLynxCommunications, Inc.(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2004, asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the"Report"), I, Gary L. Brown, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|   | (1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly      presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of      operations of the Company.
/s/ Gary L. Brown                   Gary L. Brown, President and Chief Executive OfficerJune 1, 2004 |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
§ 170.116 Can a Tribe close a cultural site or area entry road? ( a ) A Tribe with jurisdiction over a cultural site or area entry road can close it. The Tribe can carry this out: ( 1 ) During periods when the Tribe or Tribal members are involved in cultural activities; and
( 2 ) In order to protect the health and safety of the Tribal members or the general public.
( b ) Cultural site or area entry roads designated through an agreement with a public authority may only be closed according to the provisions of the agreement. See § 170.115(c).
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 395 Agreed to House (ATH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 395

 Providing for a committee of two Members to be appointed by the House 
                        to inform the President.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 18, 1999

Mr. Armey submitted the following resolution; which was considered and 
                               agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Providing for a committee of two Members to be appointed by the House 
                        to inform the President.

    Resolved, That a committee of two Members be appointed by the House 
to join a similar committee appointed by the Senate, to wait upon the 
President of the United States and inform him that the two Houses have 
completed their business of the session and are ready to adjourn, 
unless the President has some other communication to make to them.
                                 <all>
```
356 August 14, 2024 No. 564

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON

STATE OF OREGON,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v. TAYLOR BRYANT BRIGHT, Defendant-Respondent. Curry County Circuit Court 21CR16034; A179954

Cynthia Lynnae Beaman, Judge. On respondent’s petition for reconsideration filed June 14, 2024. Opinion filed June 5, 2024. 333 Or App 58 (2024). Ernest G. Lannet, Chief Defender, Criminal Appellate Section, and Matthew Blythe, Deputy Public Defender, Oregon Public Defense Commission for petition. Before Aoyagi, Presiding Judge, Joyce, Judge, and Jacquot, Judge. JOYCE, J. Reconsideration allowed; opinion modified and adhered to as modified.Cite as 334 Or App 356 (2024) 357

JOYCE, J. Defendant petitions for reconsideration of our opin

ion in State v. Bright , 333 Or App 58, ___ P3d ___ (2024). We allow reconsideration, modify our prior opinion as described below, and adhere to the opinion as modified. In his petition, defendant asks us to clarify the scope of the trial court’s authority on remand. The state has not filed a response to the petition. We grant reconsideration to clarify the scope of the court’s authority on remand. We add the following sentence to the end of the last paragraph of our original opinion, 333 Or App at 62: “We therefore reverse and remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion, including factfind

ing under the correct legal standard.” Reconsideration allowed; opinion modified and adhered to as modified.
### §2202. Regulations on production, warehousing, and supply distribution functions

The Secretary of Defense shall prescribe regulations governing the performance within the Department of Defense of the production, warehousing, and supply distribution functions, and related functions, of the Department of Defense.

(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 120; Pub. L. 100–180, div. A, title XII, §1202, Dec. 4, 1987, 101 Stat. 1153; Pub. L. 103–355, title III, §3061(a), Oct. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 3336; Pub. L. 116–283, div. A, title XVIII, §1807(b)(2), Jan. 1, 2021, 134 Stat. 4157.)

| Revised section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2202 | 41:162. | July 10, 1952, ch. 630, §638, 66 Stat. 537. |

The words "an officer or agency * * * may * * * only" are substituted for the words "no officer or agency * * * shall * * * except". The word "of", before the words "the Department", is substituted for the words "in or under". The words "under regulations prescribed" are substituted for the words "in accordance with regulations issued". The words "after the effective date of this section" and 41:162(b) are omitted as executed. The words "or equipment" are omitted as covered by the definition of "supplies" in section 101(26) of this title.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2021—Pub. L. 116–283 struck out "procurement," before "production," in section catchline and text.

1994—Pub. L. 103–355 amended heading and text generally. Prior to amendment, text read as follows:

"(a) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, an officer or agency of the Department of Defense may obligate funds for procuring, producing, warehousing, or distributing supplies, or for related functions of supply management, only under regulations prescribed by the Secretary of Defense. The purpose of this section is to achieve the efficient, economical, and practical operation of an integrated supply system to meet the needs of the military departments without duplicate or overlapping operations or functions.

"(b) Except as otherwise provided by law, the availability for obligation of funds appropriated for any program, project, or activity of the Department of Defense expires at the end of the three-year period beginning on the date that such funds initially become available for obligation unless before the end of such period the Secretary of Defense enters into a contract for such program, project, or activity."

1987—Pub. L. 100–180 designated existing provisions as subsec. (a) and added subsec. (b).

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2021 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 116–283 effective Jan. 1, 2022, with additional provisions for delayed implementation and applicability of existing law, see section 1801(d) of Pub. L. 116–283, set out as a note preceding section 3001 of this title.

#### Effective Date of 1994 Amendment

For effective date and applicability of amendment by Pub. L. 103–355, see section 10001 of Pub. L. 103–355, set out as a note under section 8752 of this title.