alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §4952. Purposes

The purposes of the program authorized by this chapter are—

(1) to increase assistance by the Department of Defense to eligible entities furnishing procurement technical assistance to business entities; and

(2) to assist eligible entities in the payment of the costs of establishing and carrying out new procurement technical assistance programs and maintaining existing procurement technical assistance programs.

(Added and amended Pub. L. 116–283, div. A, title XVIII, §1872(a)(1)(B), (3), Jan. 1, 2021, 134 Stat. 4287, 4288; Pub. L. 117–81, div. A, title XVII, §1701(m)(1)(B), (3), Dec. 27, 2021, 135 Stat. 2144, 2145.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

The text of section 2412 of this title, which was transferred to this section by Pub. L. 116–283, §1872(a)(3), was based on Pub. L. 98–525, title XII, §1241(a)(1), Oct. 19, 1984, 98 Stat. 2605; Pub. L. 99–145, title IX, §919(a), Nov. 8, 1985, 99 Stat. 692.

Pub. L. 117–81, div. A, title XVII, §1701(b)(24), (m)(2)(A), Dec. 27, 2021, 135 Stat. 2135, 2144, amended Pub. L. 116–283, §1872(a)(5), which had originally transferred section 2413 of this title to this section and made an amendment in the text. After amendment by Pub. L. 117–81, section 1872(a)(5) of Pub. L. 116–283 instead transferred section 2413 to section 4954 of this title and consequently amended the text of that section.

#### Amendments

2021—Pub. L. 117–81, §1701(m)(3), which directed amendment of section "1872(a)(B)" of Pub. L. 116–283, was executed as if it had referred to section "1872(a)(1)(B)" of Pub. L. 116–283, which enacted this section, to reflect the probable intent of Congress.

Pub. L. 116–283, §1872(a)(3), as amended by Pub. L. 117–81, §1701(m)(1)(B), transferred the text of section 2412 of this title to this section.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2021 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 117–81 applicable as if included in the enactment of title XVIII of Pub. L. 116–283 as enacted, see section 1701(a)(2) of Pub. L. 117–81, set out in a note preceding section 3001 of this title and Effective Date note below.

#### Effective Date

Section and amendment by Pub. L. 116–283 effective Jan. 1, 2022, with additional provisions for delayed implementation and applicability of existing law, see section 1801(d) of Pub. L. 116–283, set out as an Effective Date of 2021 Amendment note preceding section 3001 of this title.
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Graham Packaging Holdings Company on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, John E. Hamilton, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|   | 1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Graham Packaging Holdings Company. |
|--------|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

Date:  August 11, 2006

 

 

| By:    | /s/ John E. Hamilton    |
|--------|-------------------------|
|   | John E. Hamilton        |
|   | Chief Financial Officer |

 

 

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.

 

 

1
EXHIBIT 32.1

March 29,
2013

Via
EDGAR

Securities
and Exchange Commission
100 F Street, N.E.
Washington, D.C. 20549

Ladies
and Gentlemen:

In
connection with the Annual Report of Pacific Coast Oil Trust (the "Trust") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, not in its individual capacity but solely as the Trustee of the Trust, certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to its knowledge:



The
above certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) and is not being filed as part of the
Form 10-K or as a separate disclosure document.

The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company,
N.A., Trustee for Pacific Coast Oil TrustBy:

/s/ MIKE ULRICH Mike Ulrich Vice President and Trust Officer


---



QuickLinks
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Graham Packaging Holdings Company on Form
10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Warren D. Knowlton, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Graham Packaging Holdings Company.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: May 9, 2008



|    |  |                        
|--- |  | -----------------------
|By: |  | /s/ Warren D. Knowlton 
|    |  | Warren D. Knowlton     
|    |  | Chief Executive Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Labor Relations Board

# TIME AND DATES:

All meetings are held at 2:30 p.m.

Tuesday, February 1;

Wednesday, February 2;

Thursday, February 3;

Tuesday, February 15;

Wednesday, February 16;

Thursday, February 17;

Tuesday, February 22;

Wednesday, February 23;

Thursday, February 24.

# PLACE:

Board Agenda Room, No. 11820, 1099 14th St., NW., Washington, DC 20570.

# STATUS:

 Closed.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

Pursuant to § 102.139(a) of the Board's Rules and Regulations, the Board or a panel thereof will consider “the issuance of a subpoena, the Board's participation in a civil action or proceeding or an arbitration, or the initiation, conduct, or disposition * * * of particular representation or unfair labor practice proceedings under section 8, 9, or 10 of the [National Labor Relations] Act, or any court proceedings collateral or ancillary thereto.” See also 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(10).

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

Lester A. Heltzer, Executive Secretary, (202) 273-1067.

Dated: February 11, 2011.

Lester A. Heltzer,

Executive Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2011-3537 Filed 2-11-11; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 7545-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                          57,072
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   25,860
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                90,902
<PP&E>                                         103,342
<DEPRECIATION>                                  32,385
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 346,541
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          161,088
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        21,318
<OTHER-SE>                                     159,275
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   346,541
<SALES>                                         65,460
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                65,460
<CGS>                                           52,882
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,667,610
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,937
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,661,969)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,661,969)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              (803,235)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (3,465,204)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.17)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.17)


</TABLE>
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING 

 MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED 

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL 

OF FLORIDA 

SECOND DISTRICT 

SIDNEY DEON REYNOLDS, ) 

) 

Appellant, ) 

) 

v. ) Case No. 2D16-5271 

 ) 

STATE OF FLORIDA, ) 

) 

Appellee. ) 

___________________________________) 

Opinion filed August 2, 2017. 

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 

9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for 

Hillsborough County; Michelle Sisco, 

Judge. 

Sidney Deon Reynolds, pro se. 

 

CASANUEVA, Judge. 

Sidney Deon Reynolds appeals the postconviction court's order summarily 

denying his motion for postconviction relief in three separate cases. In his motion, he 

asserted three claims of error. Claims one and two sought postconviction relief 

pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. Finding no error, we affirm the 

postconviction court's order summarily denying claims one and two. 

 The third and remaining claim asserted an illegal sentence claim pursuant 
- 2 - 

to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). Specifically, Mr. Reynolds alleged that 

the enhancement of his mandatory minimum sentence resulted in an illegal sentence. 

 Rule 3.800(a)(1) provides that "[a] court may at any time correct an illegal 

sentence imposed by it." To the extent that the postconviction court's order can be read 

to bar this claim as untimely, that basis is incorrect. Alternatively, to the extent that the 

order can be read as failing to rule upon this claim, a remand for disposition is 

appropriate. 

 In remanding this matter for further proceedings, we are not suggesting 

the remaining claim is meritorious. Rather, that decision remains to be made by the 

postconviction court. 

 Affirmed in part; reversed in part; remanded for further proceedings. 

WALLACE and BADALAMENTI, JJ., Concur.
8040.5 I



# +AA-20)~Q80\ 09129106



### Contacts. Withwhom outside theFAAhasthis proposal been discussed?



### Organization Person Contacted Date Response National Business Aircraft Association Eli Cotti 2/1/10 

### - Regional Airline Association Dave Lotterer 2/1/10 

# - Aircraft Owners & Pilots Association Robert Hackman 211/10 

### - ATA M Lopez 2/1110 

### -
From: Jones, Earl F (GE, Appl & Light)

Sent: Friday, February 15, 2013 4:52 PM

To: 'AS_Waiver_Requests@ee.doe.gov'

Cc: Bryan Berringer Subject: GE Refrigerator Application for Interim Waiver and Petition for Waiver

Dear Mr. Assistant Secretary:

GE Appliances, an operating division of Ge neral Electric Co., ("GE") is a leading

manufacturer and marketer of household appliances, including, as relevant to this proceeding, refrigerators and refriger ator-freezers, files this Application for Interim Waiver (“Application”) and Petiti on for Waiver ("Petition"). GE requests that you grant it a waiver from certain parts of the Uniform Test Method for Measuring the Energy Consumption of Refrigerators and Refrigerator-Freezers promulgated by the Department on the grounds that the basic design of the product prevents testing in accordance with the prescribed test procedure. This request, which is attached, is filed pursuant to 10 C.F.R. §430.27.

I have also attached a Certificate of Se rvice attesting to th e fact that I have provided notice and copies of the Applicat ion and Petition to the parties listed

thereon.

Earl F Jones Sr. Counsel, Government Relations & Regulatory Compliance GE Appliances & Lighting

AP2-225 Louisville, KY 40225 (502) 452-3164 – office (502) 452-0347 – fax (502) 287-7770 - cell
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 70 (Thursday, April 11, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 21599-21600]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-08437]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

[Docket ID: DoD-2013-OS-0079]

Privacy Act of 1974; System of Records

AGENCY: Defense Information Systems Agency, DoD.

ACTION: Notice to delete three Systems of Records Notices.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Defense Information Systems Agency is deleting three 
systems of records notices in its existing inventory of record systems 
subject to the Privacy Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a), as amended.

DATES: This proposed action will be effective on May 13, 2013 unless 
comments are received which result in a contrary determination. 
Comments will be accepted on or before May 13, 2013.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by docket number and 
title, by any of the following methods:
    * Federal Rulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the 
instructions for submitting comments.
    * Mail: Federal Docket Management System Office, 4800 Mark Center 
Drive, East Tower, 2nd Floor, Suite 02G09, Alexandria, VA 22350-3100.
    Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency name 
and docket number for this Federal Register document. The general 
policy for comments and other submissions from members of the public is 
to make these submissions available for public viewing on the Internet 
at http://www.regulations.gov as they are received without change, 
including any personal identifiers or contact information.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeanette Weathers-Jenkins, 6916 Cooper 
Avenue, Fort Meade, MD 20755-7901, or (301) 225-8158.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Defense Information Systems Agency 
systems of records notices subject to the Privacy Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. 
552a), as amended, have been published in the Federal Register and are 
available from the address in FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT. The 
proposed deletions are not within the purview of subsection (r) of the 
Privacy Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a), as amended, which requires the 
submission of a new or altered system report.

[[Page 21600]]

    Dated: April 1, 2013.
Aaron Siegel,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

Deletions:
    K317.01, Mishap Report (February 22, 1993, 58 FR 10562)
    KPAC-05, 403-03 Injury Records (February 22, 1993, 58 FR 10562)
    K232.02, Injury Record File (February 22, 1993, 58 FR 10562)

Reason:
    Based on a recent review of the systems of records notices, 
K317.01, Mishap Report, KPAC-05, 403-03 Injury Records, and K232.02, 
Injury Record File, are covered by the Government wide system of 
records notice OPM/GOVT-10, Employee Medical File System Records (June 
21, 2010, 75 FR 35099). Therefore, these notices can be deleted. 
Government-wide notices can be found at http://dpclo.defense.gov/privacy/SORNs/govt/OPMGOVT-10.html.

[FR Doc. 2013-08437 Filed 4-10-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P
```
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

# Koa Kai Trains Sea Warriors, Enhances Readiness

By Rear Adm. Rick WilliamsCommander, Navy Region Hawaii and Naval Surface Group Middle Pacific

                KOA KAI 14-1, Hawaiian Islands (Navy Blog)  –              http://navylive.dodlive.mil/2014/01/24/koa-kai-trains-sea-warriors-enhances-readiness/

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT
# C_2017443EN.01022601.xml

| 22.12.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 443/226 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.12.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 443/226

---

P7_TA(2014)0374

ECSEL Joint Undertaking *

European Parliament legislative resolution of 15 April 2014 on the proposal for a Council regulation on the ECSEL Joint Undertaking (COM(2013)0501 — C7-0258/2013 — 2013/0234(NLE))

(Consultation)

(2017/C 443/55)

The European Parliament,

The European Parliament

| — | having regard to the Commission proposal to the Council (COM(2013)0501), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the Commission proposal to the Council (COM(2013)0501),

| — | having regard to Article 187 and the first paragraph of Article 188 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C7-0258/2013), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Article 187 and the first paragraph of Article 188 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C7-0258/2013),

| — | having regard to Rule 55 of its Rules of Procedure, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Rule 55 of its Rules of Procedure,

| — | having regard to the report of the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy and the opinion of the Committee on Budgetary Control (A7-0074/2014), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the report of the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy and the opinion of the Committee on Budgetary Control (A7-0074/2014),

| 1. | Approves the Commission proposal as amended; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Approves the Commission proposal as amended;

| 2. | Calls on the Commission to alter its proposal accordingly, in accordance with Article 293(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Calls on the Commission to alter its proposal accordingly, in accordance with Article 293(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union;

| 3. | Calls on the Council to notify Parliament if it intends to depart from the text approved by Parliament; |
| --- | --- |

3.

Calls on the Council to notify Parliament if it intends to depart from the text approved by Parliament;

| 4. | Asks the Council to consult Parliament again if it intends to substantially amend the Commission proposal; |
| --- | --- |

4.

Asks the Council to consult Parliament again if it intends to substantially amend the Commission proposal;

| 5. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and the Commission. |
| --- | --- |

5.

Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and the Commission.

---

P7_TC1-NLE(2013)0234

Position of the European Parliament adopted on 15 April 2014 with a view to the adoption of Council Regulation (EU) No .../2014 establishing the ECSEL Joint Undertaking

(As an agreement was reached between Parliament and Council, Parliament's position corresponds to the final legislative act, Council Regulation (EU) No 561/2014)

---
[No. 4725.]

#### M. B. Lysight, County Assessor, and the Board of County Commissioners of Teller County, Colorado, v. The Des Moines Cold Mining Company, a Corporation.

Former Opinion Followed.

The appeal in this action is dismissed, for want of jurisdiction, in accordance with the reasons set forth in Board of County Commissioners of Teller County v. Pinnacle Gold Mining Company, ante, p. 492.

*Appeal from the District Court of Teller County.*

*Ron. Robert E. Lewis, Judge.*

Appeal by M. B. Lysight, as county assessor, and the board of county commissioners of Teller county from a judgment of the district court reducing the assessment of taxes against The Des Moines Cold Mining Company.

Decision *en banc.*

*Dismissed.*

Mr. C. S. Thomas and Mr. Scott Ashton, for appellant;

Mr. Justice Bailey

delivered the opinion of the court:

The appeal in this action is dismissed, for lack of jurisdiction, because of the reasons set forth in *Board of County Commissioners of Teller County v. The Pinnacle Gold Mining Company.*

Decision *m barnc.*

*Dismissed.*