alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §2387. Contract working dogs: requirement to transfer animals to 341st Training Squadron after service life

(a) In General.—Each contract entered into by the Secretary of Defense for the provision of a contract working dog shall require, and shall contain a contract term, that the dog be transferred to the 341st Training Squadron and assigned for veterinary screening and care in accordance with section 2583 of this title after the service life of the dog has terminated as described in subsection (b) for reclassification as a military animal and placement for adoption in accordance with such section.

(b) Service Life.—The service life of a contract working dog has terminated and the dog is available for transfer to the 341st Training Squadron pursuant to a contract under subsection (a) only if the contracting officer concerned has determined that—

(1) the final contractual obligation of the dog preceding such transfer is with the Department of Defense; and

(2) the dog cannot be used by another department or agency of the Federal Government due to age, injury, or performance.

(c) Contract Working Dog.—In this section, the term "contract working dog" means a dog—

(1) that performs a service for the Department of Defense pursuant to a contract; and

(2) that is trained and kenneled by an entity that provides such a dog pursuant to such a contract.

(Added Pub. L. 114–328, div. A, title III, §342(a)(1), Dec. 23, 2016, 130 Stat. 2082, §2410r; amended Pub. L. 116–92, div. A, title III, §372(f), Dec. 20, 2019, 133 Stat. 1331; renumbered §2387, Pub. L. 116–283, div. A, title XVIII, §1882(b), Jan. 1, 2021, 134 Stat. 4293.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 2387, added Pub. L. 85–861, §1(45), Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1458, related to limitation on procurement of table and kitchen equipment for officers' quarters, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 114–328, div. A, title VIII, §833(b)(4)(A), Dec. 23, 2016, 130 Stat. 2285.

#### Amendments

2021—Pub. L. 116–283 renumbered section 2410r of this title as this section.

2019—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 116–92 inserted ", and shall contain a contract term," after "shall require" and "and assigned for veterinary screening and care in accordance with section 2583 of this title" after "341st Training Squadron" and substituted "such section" for "section 2583 of this title".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2021 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 116–283 effective Jan. 1, 2022, with additional provisions for delayed implementation and applicability of existing law, see section 1801(d) of Pub. L. 116–283, set out as a note preceding section 3001 of this title.
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 36 (Wednesday, February 23, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 10070]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-3924]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Drug Enforcement Administration


Manufacturer of Controlled Substances; Notice of Registration

    By Notice dated October 8, 2010, and published in the Federal 
Register on October 20, 2010, 75 FR 64745, Halo Pharmaceutical Inc., 30 
North Jefferson Road, Whippany, New Jersey 07981, made application by 
renewal to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) to be registered 
as a bulk manufacturer of the following basic classes of controlled 
substances:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                    Drug                               Schedule
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dihydromorphine (9145).....................  I
Hydromorphone (9150).......................  II
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Dihydromorphine is an intermediate in the manufacture of 
Hydromorphone and is not for commercial distribution. The company plans 
to manufacture Hydromorphone HCL for sale to other manufacturers and 
for the manufacture of other controlled substance dosage units for 
distribution to its customers.
    No comments or objections have been received. DEA has considered 
the factors in 21 U.S.C. 823(a) and determined that the registration of 
Halo Pharmaceutical Inc. to manufacture the listed basic classes of 
controlled substances is consistent with the public interest at this 
time. DEA has investigated Halo Pharmaceutical Inc. to ensure that the 
company's registration is consistent with the public interest. The 
investigation has included inspection and testing of the company's 
physical security systems, verification of the company's compliance 
with state and local laws, and a review of the company's background and 
history. Therefore, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 823(a), and in accordance 
with 21 CFR 1301.33, the above named company is granted registration as 
a bulk manufacturer of the basic classes of controlled substances 
listed.

    Dated: February 16, 2011.
Joseph T. Rannazzisi,
Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug 
Enforcement Administration.
[FR Doc. 2011-3924 Filed 2-22-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-09-P
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Peregrine Industries, Inc. (the“Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended December 31, 2004 (the“Report”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof, I, Ivo Heiden, CFO of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

/s/ Ivo Heiden

Ivo HeidenCFO and DirectorDated: May 3, 2005

A signed original of this writtenstatement required by Section 906 has been provided to Peregrine Industries, Inc. and willbe retained by Peregrine Industries, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Raymond J. Somers, Appellant.

[823 NYS2d 924]

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Chemung County (Buckley, J.), rendered February 14, 2005, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of incest.

In satisfaction of a six-count indictment, defendant pleaded guilty to incest. In accordance with the plea agreement, he was sentenced as a second felony offender to the minimum permis*1133sible term of imprisonment of IV2 to 3 years *(see*Penal Law § 70.06 [3] [e]; [4] [b]). He now appeals.

Counsel for defendant seeks to be relieved of his assignment of representing defendant on the ground that there are no nonfrivolous issues to be raised on appeal. Based upon our review of the record and appellate counsel’s brief, we agree. Therefore, the judgment is affirmed and the application to be relieved of assignment is granted *(see People v Cruwys,*113 AD2d 979 [1985], *lv denied*67 NY2d 650 [1986]; *see generally People v Stokes,*95 NY2d 633 [2001]).

Cardona, EJ., Crew III, Peters, Rose and Lahtinen, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, and application to be relieved of assignment granted.
#### People of the State of Illinois, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. William Hickock, Defendant-Appellant.

Gen. No. 50,012.

First District, Second Division.

September 28, 1965.

Rehearing denied October 14, 1965.

Melvin B. Lewis, of Chicago, for appellant; Daniel P. Ward, State’s Attorney of Cook County, of Chicago (Elmer C. Kissane and Albert J. Armonda, Assistant State’s Attorneys, of counsel), for appellee.

Opinion by

JUSTICE BURKE.

Not to be published in full.
#### § 1000.146 Can a Tribe/Consortium negotiate an AFA with a non-BIA bureau for which the performance period exceeds one year?

Yes, subject to the terms of the AFA, a Tribe/Consortium and a non-BIA bureau may agree to provide for the performance under the AFA to extend beyond the fiscal year. However, the Department may not obligate funds in excess and advance of available appropriations.
#### Jack CUPPLES, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America.

No. 15197.

United States Court of Appeals Eighth Circuit.

Oct. 21, 1954.

Morris A. Shenker, St. Louis, Mo., for appellant.

Harry Richards, U. S. Atty., and Robert C. Tucker, Asst. U. S. Atty., St. Louis, Mo., for appellee.

Appeal from the District Court dismissed, on motion of appellant.
SERVED: February 4, 2014 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

THOMAS BRAY 

FAA DOCKET NO. [TO BE ASSIGNED] 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

FDMS NO. FAA 2013- 0621 

NOTICE OF TENTATIVE HEARING DATES 

No courtrooms are available the week of March 10 through 14, 2014, in Phoenix, AZ. 

The earliest this case will be scheduled is May/June 2014. 

Richard C. Goodwin 

U.S. Administrative Law Judge 

Attachment - Service List 
SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

' 800 Independence A venue, S. W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W10001 

ONE COPY 

Lisa J. Toscano, Complainant's Counsel 

Attorney, Office of Regional Counsel, A WP-7 

Western-Pacific Region 

Federal Aviation Administration 

P.O. Box 92007 

Los Angeles, CA 90009-2007 

TEL: 310-725-7110 

F~: 310-725-6816 

Thomas H. Bray, Respondent 

30382 U.S. Highway 60-89, #11 

Wickenburg, AZ 85390 

TEL: 901-226-0142 

E-MAIL: multigrainscpt@msn.com 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (E11-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-5121' Staff Assistant 

F ~: 202-366-7536 

FDMS No. FAA-2013-0621 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

1 

Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000, Washington, 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 

2
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 204 Agreed to House (ATH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 204

 Designating minority membership on certain standing committees of the 
                                 House.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 9, 1999

Mr. Frost submitted the following resolution; which was considered and 
                               agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Designating minority membership on certain standing committees of the 
                                 House.

    Resolved, That the following named Members be, and are hereby, 
elected to the following standing committees of the House of 
Representatives:
    Committee on Resources: Mr. Holt of New 
Jersey.
    Committee on Science: Mr. Baird of Washington, Mr. Hoeffel of 
Pennsylvania, and Mr. Moore of Kansas.
    Committee on Veterans' Affairs: Mr. Hill of 
Indiana and Mr. Udall of New Mexico.
                                 <all>
```
§ 170.200 How do BIA and FHWA determine the TTP funding amount? 23 U.S.C. 202(b)(3)(A) provides the basis for the funding formula and its transition into use. The annual TTP funding amount available for distribution is determined as follows: ( a ) The following set-asides are applied to the Tribal transportation program before the determination of final Tribal shares: ( 1 ) Tribal transportation planning (23 U.S.C. 202(c));
( 2 ) Tribal transportation facility bridges (23 U.S.C. 202(d));
( 3 ) Tribal safety (23 U.S.C 202(e));
( 4 ) Administrative expenses (23 U.S.C 202(a)(6)); and
( 5 ) Tribal supplemental program (23 U.S.C. 202(b)(3)(C)).
( b ) After deducting the set asides identified in paragraph (a) of this section, on October 1 of each fiscal year, the Secretaries will distribute the remainder authorized to be appropriated for the TTP among Indian Tribes as follows: ( 1 ) For fiscal year 2016 and thereafter: ( i ) For each Indian Tribe, 20 percent of the total relative need distribution factor and population adjustment factor as determined by the Tribal Transportation Allocation Methodology (see 25 CFR 170 dated July 19, 2004)) for the fiscal year 2011 funding amount made available to that Indian Tribe; and
( ii ) The remainder using Tribal shares as described in § 170.201 and Tribal supplemental funding as described in § 170.202.
( 2 ) [Reserved]
### §2115. Graduates: limitation on number permitted to perform civilian Federal service

The Secretary of Defense may allow not more than 20 percent of the graduates of each class at the University to perform civilian Federal service for not less than seven years following the completion of their professional education in lieu of active duty in a uniformed service if the needs of the uniformed services do not require that such graduates perform active duty in a uniformed service and as long as the Secretary of Defense does not recall such persons to active duty in the uniformed services. Such persons who execute an agreement in writing to perform such civilian Federal service may be released from active duty following the completion of their professional education. The location and type of their duty shall be determined by the Secretary of Defense after consultation with the heads of Federal agencies concerned.

(Added Pub. L. 92–426, §2(a), Sept. 21, 1972, 86 Stat. 716; amended Pub. L. 96–107, title VIII, §803(c)(1), (2), Nov. 9, 1979, 93 Stat. 812.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1979—Pub. L. 96–107, §803(c)(2), substituted "permitted" for "electing" and "service" for "duty" in section catchline.

Pub. L. 96–107, §803(c)(1), substituted provisions respecting authority of the Secretary of Defense to allow graduates to perform civilian Federal service and the execution of agreements for such service as prerequisites for release from active duty following completion of education, for provisions relating to limitations on the number of graduates electing to perform civilian Federal duty, agreements respecting such service, and release from active duty upon completion of their education.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

# Readout of Assistant Secretary of Defense Ely Ratner's Meeting with Papua New Guinea's Deputy Prime Minister John Rosso

U.S. Department of Defense

Department of Defense Spokesman LTC Marty Meiners provided the following readout:

Assistant Secretary of Defense for Indo-Pacific Security Affairs Ely Ratner met today at the Pentagon with Papua New Guinea's Deputy Prime Minister, John Rosso, and his senior delegation. 

The two officials discussed how the United States and Papua New Guinea (PNG) have deepened their defense and security ties to further advance a shared vision for a free and open Indo-Pacific, including peace, stability, and prosperity in the Pacific Islands region. They welcomed recent milestones in the U.S.-Papua New Guinea bilateral relationship, including the 2023 signing of the Defense Cooperation Agreement (DCA), as well as Secretary Austin's historic trip in July 2023 as the first U.S. Secretary of Defense to visit Papua New Guinea. Both officials also committed to a robust agenda to deepen U.S.-PNG cooperation under the new DCA in the coming year.

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT
No. 9958.

#### The State ex rel. J. Hug et al. vs. R. C. Davey, Recorder.

A. suspensive appeal suspends the execution of the judgment complained of, but does not divest the court of jurisdiction over a controversy involving, not the identical, hut a similar matter.

Iu such a case prohibition does not lie against the court.

^PPLICATION for Prohibition.

*Belden & Armbruster*for the Relator.

Tiie opinion of the Court was delivered by

Bermudez, C. J.

This is an application for a prohibition. The relators aver that they were prosecuted before the defendant on the 30th of March, 1887, for violation of ordinance 4798, A. S., prohibiting private markets within six squares of a public market, and that the recorder lias no jurisdiction over the prosecutions, for the reason that they have taken suspensive appeals from judgments in similar prosecutions, which are pending before this Court under No. 9935 of its docket.

*508The statement of the ground of complaint carries its refutation.

The appeals have suspended the execution of the judgments and cannot divest the recorder of jurisdiction over subsequent similar prosecutions.

Furthermore, the appeals to which reference is made have been decided, the judgments affirmed, and the rehearing asked refused.

Application refused.
§ 122.4 Establishment of the Osage Tribal Education Committee. ( a ) The Osage Tribe, to maintain its right of Tribal autonomy, shall, at the direction of the Bureau of Indian Affairs, establish the Osage Tribal Education Committee (OTEC) to fulfill the responsibilities and provisions of this part as set out in § 122.6.
( b ) This committee shall be composed of seven (7) members. Five (5) of the members shall be of Osage blood or descendents of Osage, and two (2) from the education staff of the Bureau of Indian Affairs. ( 1 ) Of the five Osage members, at least three shall be legal residents and/or live within a 20-mile radius of one of the three Osage Indian villages. Of these, at least one member shall reside within the specified radius of the Pawhuska Indian village; at least one member shall reside within the specified radius of the Hominy Indian village; and at least one member shall reside within the specified radius of the Greyhorse Indian village.
( 2 ) The two remaining Osage committee members will be members at large.
Page 1 of 1

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460

OFFICE OF POLICY

MEMORANDUM

SUBJECT: Transmittal to Docket: Summary of the March 15, 2011, Public Meeting 

with Tribal Leaders in Denver, Colorado, regarding the Environmental 

Protection Agency’s Implementation of Executive Order 13563: Improving 

Regulation and Regulatory Review

FROM: Stuart C. Miles-McLean

Office of Regulatory Policy and Management

TO: Public Docket #EPA-HQ-OA-2011-0156: Improving Regulations: General

As called for by President Obama in Executive Order 13563, "to facilitate the periodic 

review of existing significant regulations," the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is 

considering "how best to promote retrospective analysis of rules that may be outmoded, 

ineffective, insufficient, or excessively burdensome, and to modify, streamline, expand, or repeal 

them in accordance with what has been learned." 

As part of its retrospective review of regulations, EPA convened public meetings around 

the country to gather input on how we might design the plan we will use to periodically review 

our regulations. This Memo transmits to the docket a summary of the public meeting with tribal 

leaders held on March 15, 2011, in Denver, Colorado.
### Mineral resources of Glacier Bay National Monument, Alaska

By: E.M. MacKevett Jr.D. A. BrewC. C. HawleyL.C. HuffJames G. Smith

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/pp632

#### Links

- More information:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**                            (html)
-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 3**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 4**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 5**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 6**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 7**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 8**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 9**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 10**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 11**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 12**                            (pdf) 
- Superseded Publications:
                                        Mineral resources of Glacier Bay National Monument, Alaska(1967)                                    

- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
#### John A. Morris, Appellant, v. Louis Bernstein, Respondent.

Judgment modified by striking therefrom the words “upon the merits,” and as so modified affirmed, without costs.' Ho opinion.
#### § 162.519 May a WEEL allow for compatible uses by the Indian landowner?

The WEEL may provide for the Indian landowners to use, or authorize others to use, the leased premises for other noncompeting uses compatible with the purpose of the WEEL. This may include the right to lease the premises for other compatible purposes. Any such use by the Indian landowners will not reduce or offset the monetary compensation for the WEEL.