alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 170.911 Are Indians entitled to employment and training preferences? ( a ) Federal law gives hiring and training preferences, to the greatest extent feasible, to Indians for all work performed under the TTP.
( b ) Under 25 U.S.C. 450e(b), 23 U.S.C. 140(d), 25 U.S.C. 47, and 23 U.S.C. 202(a)(3), Indian organizations and Indian-owned economic enterprises are entitled to a preference, to the greatest extent feasible, in the award of contracts, subcontracts and sub-grants for all work performed under the TTP.
H. Res. 30

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

February 2, 1999.

Resolved, That the following named Members be, and

they are hereby, elected to the following standing committees

of the House of Representatives:

COMMITTEE ON GOVERNMENT REFORM: Mr. Doolittle

and Mrs. Chenoweth.

COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY: Mr. Bachus.

COMMITTEE ON SCIENCE: Mr. Sanford and Mr. Metcalf.

COMMITTEE ON SMALL BUSINESS: Mr. Pease, Mr.

Thune, and Mrs. Bono.

COMMITTEE ON TRANSPORTATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE: Mr. Bereuter, Mr. Kuykendall, and Mr. Simpson.

COMMITTEE ON VETERANS’ AFFAIRS: Mr. Hansen, Mr.

McKeon, and Mr. Gibbons; all to rank in the named order

following Mr. LaHood.

Attest:

Clerk.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice 7291]

# DATES:

                        Interested parties are invited to submit, in duplicate, comments relative to this application on or before [30 days from publication of this notice] to Alexander Yuan, OES/ENV, NEPA Compliance Officer, Room 2627, Office of Environment, Oceans and International Environmental Affairs, Department of State, Washington, DC 20520. Comments can also be e-mailed to                         *YuanAW@state.gov.*                         The application and related documents that are part of the record to be considered by the Department of State in connection with this application are available for inspection in the Office of International Energy and Commodities Policy during normal business hours.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Alex Yuan at (202) 647-4284; or by e-mail at                         *YuanAW@State.gov*                         or Michael P. Stewart, Office of International Energy and Commodity Policy (EB/ESC/IEC/EPC), Department of State, Washington, DC 20520; or by telephone at (202) 647-1291; or by e-mail at                         *StewartMP@State.gov.*

Dated: January 5, 2011. 

Stephen J. Gallogly,

Director, Office of International Energy and Commodity Policy, Department of State.

[FR Doc. 2011-352 Filed 1-10-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710-07-P
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32.1

                 STATEMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER FURNISHED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

        The undersigned, Aubrey L. Dunn, Jr., is the President and Chief
Executive Officer of First Federal Banc of the Southwest, Inc. (the "Company").

        This statement is being furnished in connection with the filing by the
Company of the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended
March 31, 2005 (the "Report").

        By execution of this statement, I certify that to the best of my
knowledge:

                A)      the Report fully complies with the requirements of
                        Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
                        1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)) and

                B)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
                        in all material respects, the financial condition and
                        results of operations of the Company as of the dates and
                        for the periods covered by the Report.

        This statement is authorized to be attached as an exhibit to the Report
so that this statement will accompany the Report at such time as the Report is
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not intended that this
statement be deemed to be filed for purposes of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended.

        A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to First Federal Banc of the Southwest, Inc. and will be retained
by First Federal Banc of the Southwest, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



May 31, 2005                              /s/ Aubrey L. Dunn, Jr.
------------------------                  --------------------------------------
Dated                                     Aubrey L. Dunn, Jr.
                                          President and Chief Executive Officer
155 So.2d 602

#### William S. COFFIN, Jr. v. STATE.

3 Div. 43.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

July 25, 1963.

Fred Gray and Solomon S. Seay, Jr., Montgomery, Jack Greenberg and Leroy D. *694Clark, New York City, and Louis H. Poliak, New Haven, Conn., for petitioner.

Richmond M. Flowers, Atty. Gen., and Leslie Hall, Asst. Atty. Gen., opposed.

COLEMAN, Justice.

Petition of William S. Coffin, Jr., for certiorari to the Court of Appeals to review and revise the judgment and decision of that Court in Coffin v. State, 155 So.2d 602.

Writ denied.

LIVINGSTON, C. J., and LAWSON and GOODWYN, JJ., concur.
#### Joe Williams v. The State.

No. 22909.

Delivered June 21, 1944.

The opinion states the case.

*Samuel K. Wasaff,*of El Paso, for appellant.

*Ernest S. Goens,*State’s Attorney, of Austin, for the State.

DAVIDSON, Judge.

For driving an automobile upon a public highway while intoxicated, appellant was assessed the minimum punishment of a fine of $50.00.

There are no bills of exception accompanying the record.

The officer who arrested appellant while he was driving the automobile 'testified that he smelled liquor on his breath. He described his acts and conduct, and upon which he expressed the opinion that appellant was drunk at that time. This testimony was sufficient to authorize the jury’s conclusion that appellant was intoxicated.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Appellant, v. William A. SHARP, Appellee.

No. 13950.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Nov. 4, 1954.

*603Laughlin E. Waters, Clyde C. Downing, Herbert A. Greenwood, Max P. Deutz, U. S. Attys., Glendale, Marvin H. Zinman, Asst. U. S. Atty., Los Angeles, Cal., for appellant.

Owen E. O’Neil, South Pasadena, Cal., Daniel L. Fletcher, Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee.

Before STEPHENS and FEE, Circuit Judges, and GOODMAN, District Judge.

PER CURIAM.

The United States sued in the District Court on a promissory note executed by the appellee to Henry A. Petter Supply Co., under the terms of Title 1, of the National Housing Act, 12 U.S.C.A. § 1701 et seq. As authorized by the Act, payment of the note was insured or guaranteed by the Federal Housing Administrator. Petter, for value, endorsed the note to Commercial Credit Company, who became a holder in due course. Appellee failed to pay the note. Upon demand of Commercial Credit Company, the United States paid it off and thus became a holder in due course.

The appellee signed the note “Paducah Recreational Center by W. A. Sharp, Prop.” Before appellee executed the note, he filed an application on Federal Housing Administration form 1178a for credit and this form was signed in the same manner as the note.

Appellee contends, as he did in the court below, that he in fact executed the note in a representative capacity on behalf of Sharp’s Recreations, Inc., a corporation and that Paducah Recreational Center was merely the trade name of a bowling alley owned and operated by the corporation; further that he had also signed an application for credit on form 1178a on behalf of the corporation. This alleged document was not and could not be produced.

The court below, on the basis of this testimony, held that the appellee executed the note in a representative capacity and hence was not personally liable, and entered judgment in his favor.

We agree with the United States that the judgment below was erroneous and that the appellee is personally liable on the note.

Appellee signed the note in his personal capacity as owner or proprietor of Paducah Recreational Center. The instrument does not disclose the name of any principal for whom appellee purported to act. Nor did it disclose on its face that he was in fact acting for any principal other than himself. Furthermore, the attempt to shift liability to a principal undisclosed on the note must fail as against the United States, a holder in due course. Applicable statutory and decisional law is too well known and uniform to warrant repetition here.

*604The conclusion of the court below, that by reason of unreasonable delky in instituting the action, the government was barred from collecting the note from the appellee, cannot be sustained. The defense of laches does not apply where the United States enforces its rights. U. S. v. Summerlin, 310 U.S. 414-416, 60 S.Ct. 1019, 84 L.Ed. 1283 and cases there cited.

The judgment is reversed.
### §3803. Security for advance payments

Advance payments made under section 3801 of this title may be made only if the contractor gives adequate security and after a determination by the head of the agency that to do so would be in the public interest. Such security may be in the form of a lien in favor of the United States on the property contracted for, on the balance in an account in which such payments are deposited, and on such of the property acquired for performance of the contract as the parties may agree. This lien is paramount to any other liens and is effective immediately upon the first advancement of funds without filing, notice, or any other action by the United States.

(Added and amended Pub. L. 116–283, div. A, title XVIII, §1834(a), (d), Jan. 1, 2021, 134 Stat. 4234, 4236.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

The text of subsec. (d) of section 2307 of this title, which was transferred to this section and amended by Pub. L. 116–283, §1834(d), was based on act Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 131; Pub. L. 85–800, §9, Aug. 28, 1958, 72 Stat. 967; Pub. L. 103–355, title II, §2001(a)(4), (7), (d), Oct. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 3301, 3302.

#### Amendments

2021—Pub. L. 116–283, §1834(d), transferred subsec. (d) of section 2307 of this title to this section, struck out subsec. (d) designation and heading "Security for Advance Payments" at beginning, and substituted "section 3801 of this title" for "subsection (a)".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section and amendment by Pub. L. 116–283 effective Jan. 1, 2022, with additional provisions for delayed implementation and applicability of existing law, see section 1801(d) of Pub. L. 116–283, set out as an Effective Date of 2021 Amendment note preceding section 3001 of this title.
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVEOFFICER**

I,Stephen V. Clark, certify that:

1.    I havereviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Bertucci’sCorporation;

2.    Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.    Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

4.    The Registrant’sother certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) [omitted] for the Registrant and have:

a.     designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the Registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

b.     [omitted]

c.     evaluatedthe effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and

d.     disclosedin this report any change in the Registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the Registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theRegistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theRegistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.    TheRegistrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theRegistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the Registrant’s board ofdirectors:

a.     allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the Registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

b.     any fraud,whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
| Date: November 10, 2006 |   | By:    |   | /s/ Stephen V. Clark                 |   |   |
|-------------------------|--------|--------|--------|--------------------------------------|--------|--------|
|                    |   |   |   | Stephen V. Clark                     |   |   |
|                    |   |   |   | Chief Executive Officer and Director |   |   |

 

----
#### § 215.25 Other minerals and deep-lying lead and zinc minerals.

Except as provided in § 215.6(b), leases on Quapaw Indian lands, for mining minerals other than lead and zinc and for lead and zinc and associated minerals below the horizon of the rock stratum known as the Reed Springs Formation, shall be made pursuant to the provisions of part 212 of this subchapter.

[26 FR 1910, Mar. 4, 1961. Redesignated at 47 FR 13327, Mar. 30, 1982]
-86 -84 -82 -80 -78 -76 -74 -72 -70

32 34 36 38 40 42


### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 1000 18 12 06 00 06/17 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 17 Jun 06

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 38.92 N 77.01 WMeters AGL
# C_2014042EN.01000601.xml

| 13.2.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 42/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.2.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 42/6

---

Commission information notice pursuant to Article 17(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community

Invitation to tender in respect of the operation of scheduled air services in accordance with public service obligations

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2014/C 42/06)

| Member State | Italy |
| --- | --- |
| Route concerned | Pantelleria–Trapani and vice versa
  Pantelleria–Palermo and vice versa
  Lampedusa–Palermo and vice versa
  Lampedusa–Catania and vice versa |
| Period of validity of the contract | From 1 July 2014 to 30 June 2017 |
| Deadline for submission of tenders | 60 days after the date of publication of this tender invitation |
| Address where the text of the invitation to tender and any relevant information and/or documentation related to the public tender and the public service obligations can be obtained | For further information, please contact:





  Ente Nazionale per l’Aviazione Civile (ENAC) |
| Direzione sviluppo trasporto aereo |
| Viale Castro Pretorio 118 |
| 00185 Roma RM |
| ITALIA |
| Tel. +39 0644596564 |
| Fax +39 0644596591 |
| E-mail: osp@enac.gov.it |
| Internet: http://www.mit.gov.it |
| http://www.enac.gov.it |

Member State

Italy

Route concerned

Pantelleria–Trapani and vice versa

Pantelleria–Palermo and vice versa

Lampedusa–Palermo and vice versa

Lampedusa–Catania and vice versa

Period of validity of the contract

From 1 July 2014 to 30 June 2017

Deadline for submission of tenders

60 days after the date of publication of this tender invitation

Address where the text of the invitation to tender and any relevant information and/or documentation related to the public tender and the public service obligations can be obtained

For further information, please contact:

Ente Nazionale per l’Aviazione Civile (ENAC)

Direzione sviluppo trasporto aereo

Viale Castro Pretorio 118

00185 Roma RM

ITALIA

Tel. +39 0644596564

Fax +39 0644596591

E-mail: osp@enac.gov.it

Internet: http://www.mit.gov.it

http://www.enac.gov.it

---
#### § 17.5 Minors represented at hearings.

Minor heirs at law, who by the terms of the will are devised a lesser interest in the estate than they would take by descent, of whose interests are challenged, shall, with the approval of the special attorney, be represented at the hearing by guardians ad litem. Such minors 14 years of age or over may indicate in writing their choice of guardians ad litem. If no such choice has been indicated on the date of the hearing, the special attorney shall make the selection and appointment.
# C_2006154EN.01002701.xml

| 1.7.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 154/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.7.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 154/27

---

Action brought on 3 May 2006 — Lebedef-Caponi v Commission

(Case F-50/06)

(2006/C 154/62)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Maddalena Lebedef-Caponi (Senningerberg, Luxembourg) (represented by: G. Bounéou and F. Frabetti, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the applicant's career development report for the period 1.7.2001 to 31.12.2002; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the applicant's career development report for the period 1.7.2001 to 31.12.2002;

| — | order the Commission of the European Communities to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission of the European Communities to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of her action, the applicant puts forward five pleas in law, alleging:

| — | first, breach of Article 26 of the Staff Regulations; |
| --- | --- |

—

first, breach of Article 26 of the Staff Regulations;

| — | second, breach of the general implementing provisions of Article 43 of the Staff Regulations; |
| --- | --- |

—

second, breach of the general implementing provisions of Article 43 of the Staff Regulations;

| — | third, breach of the principle of the prohibition of arbitrary process and of the principle of the prohibition of misuse of powers and breach of the obligation to state reasons; |
| --- | --- |

—

third, breach of the principle of the prohibition of arbitrary process and of the principle of the prohibition of misuse of powers and breach of the obligation to state reasons;

| — | fourth, breach of the principle of protection of legitimate expectations and of the rule patere legem quam ipse fecisti; |
| --- | --- |

—

fourth, breach of the principle of protection of legitimate expectations and of the rule patere legem quam ipse fecisti;

patere legem quam ipse fecisti

| — | fifth, breach of the duty to have regard to the welfare of officials. |
| --- | --- |

—

fifth, breach of the duty to have regard to the welfare of officials.

---
### United States Steel Corporation

– Minntac

Response to U. S. EPA Section 114 Request April 24, 20 12
**Item 3** For the time period January 1, 2007 to December 31, 2011, provide records of the natural gas used by

each specific indurating furnace at the facility

. **Person(s): that provided information used or considered in responding to the question or were co** **nsulted in the preparation of the response:** Teresa Simetkosky **Answer:**

**Year Line 3**  **Line 4 Line 5**  **Line 6 Line 7**  **2007** 562,346 1,272,785 1,157,004 881,626 963,958 **2008** 1,173,945 1,383,047 1,242,028 996,588 951,371 **2009** 260,663 767,903 767,583 565,140 997,330 **2010** 898,673 883,870 1,069,473 1,113,938 1,393,496 **2011** 1,195,476 995,059 1,331,812 1,319,563 1,455,057 *Natural gas usage is in MCF