# In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 19

- 0039 V (not to be published)

SAUM ESHRAGHI

,

Petitioner,

v.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND

HUMAN SERVICES,

Respondent. Chief Special Master Corcoran

Filed: March 24 , 2022

Special Processing Unit (SPU);
Attorney’s Fees and Costs

Leigh Finfer, Muller Brazil, LLP, Dresher, PA , for P etitioner.

Traci R. Patton , U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for R espondent.

DECISION ON ATTORNEY ’ S FEES AND COSTS 1

On January 7, 2019, Saum Eshraghi filed a petition for compensation under the
National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa

- 10, et seq. 2 (the
“Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges a Table claim for a shoulder injury related to vaccination

or in the alternative, a cause

- in

- fact claim of SIRVA caused by a Tdap vacci ne that he

received on November 1, 2016. ( Petition at 1 )

. On September 23 , 2021

, a decision was
issued awarding compensation to P etitioner based on the parties’ stipulation . ( ECF No.

45 )

.

1 Because this unpublished D ecision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E

Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the D ecision will be available to anyone with access to the

internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access.

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99

- 660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the per tinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2012).2 Petitioner has now filed a motion for attorney’s fees and costs, dated February 1 5

, 2022, (ECF No. 50 ) , requesting a total award of $ 16,611.72 (representing $ 15,511.70 in
fees and $ 1,100.02 in costs). In accordance with General Order No. 9, counsel for

Petitioner represents that Petitioner incurred no out

- of

- pocket expenses

. ( Id. at 2 ).
Respondent reacted to the motion on February 1 5 , 2022, indicating that he is satisfied
the statutory requirements for an award of attorneys’ fees and costs are met in this case

but deferring resolution of the amount to b e awarded at the Court’s discretion. (ECF No.

51 ). Petitioner did not file a reply thereafter.

I have reviewed the billing records submitted with P etitioner’s request. In my experience , the request appears reasonable, and I find no cause to reduce the requested

hours or rates.

The Vaccine Act permits an award of reasonable attorney ’ s fees and costs

. Section
15(e). Accordingly, I hereby GRANT Petitioner’s Motion for attorney’s fees and costs. I

award a total of $16,611.72 (representing $ 15,511.70 in fees and $ 1,100.02 in costs) as a lump sum in the form of a check jointly payable to Petitioner and Petitioner’s counse l.
In the absence of a timely

- filed motion for review (see Appendix B to the Rules of the
Court), the Clerk shall enter judgment in accordance with this decision. 3

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/ Brian H. Corcoran

Brian H. Corcoran

Chief Special Master

3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), the parties may expedite entry of judgment by filing a joint notice renouncing their right to seek review.