alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# EUR-Lex - 52013PC0559 - EN

*|*

# 52013PC0559

**Proposal for a DECISION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL on the Mobilisation of the Flexibility Instrument /* COM/2013/0559 final */**

			*

			*

EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM

The Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May
2006[1] allows for the mobilisation of
the Flexibility Instrument to allow the financing of clearly identified
expenditure which could not be financed within the limits of the ceilings available
for one or more headings of the multiannual financial framework.

In accordance with point 27 of the
Interinstitutional Agreement, and after having examined all possibilities for
re-allocating appropriations under heading 1b, the Commission proposes to
mobilise the Flexibility Instrument to complement the financing in the general
budget of the European Union for the financial year 2013, beyond the ceiling of
heading 1b, of EUR 134 049 037 towards the financing of the
European Social Fund to increase the allocations to France, Italy and Spain for
the year 2013

The two arms of the budgetary authority are
reminded that the publication of the Decision in the Official Journal of the
European Union shall not intervene later than the publication for the related
Amending Budget for the year 2013.

Proposal for a

DECISION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT
AND OF THE COUNCIL

on the Mobilisation of the Flexibility
Instrument

THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE
COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Interinstitutional
Agreement of 17 May 2006 between the European Parliament, the Council and the
Commission on budgetary discipline and sound financial management[2], and in particular the fifth
paragraph of point 27 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the
European Commission,

Whereas, after having examined all
possibilities for re-allocating appropriations under heading 1b, it appears
necessary to mobilise the flexibility instrument to complement the financing in
the general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2013, beyond
the ceiling of heading 1b, of EUR 134 049 037 towards the
financing of the European Social Fund to increase the allocations to France,
Italy and Spain for the year 2013 by a total amount of EUR 150 000 000.

HAVE ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

For the general budget of the European
Union for the financial year 2013, the flexibility instrument shall be used to
provide the sum of EUR 134 049 037 in commitment
appropriations in heading 1b.

That amount shall be used to complement the
financing of the European
Social Fund under heading 1b .

Article 2

This
decision shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels,

For the European Parliament                       For
the Council

The President                                                 The
President

[1]               OJ C 139, 14.06.2006, p. 1

[2]               OJ C 139, 14.6.2006, p. 1.
### §7591. Utilities: proceeds from overseas operations

During actual or threatened hostilities, proceeds from operating a public utility in connection with operations of the Corps of Engineers in the field overseas are available for that utility until the close of the fiscal year following that in which they are received.

(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 257, §4591; renumbered §7591, Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, §808(d), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1839.)

| Revised section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 4591 | 10:1287. | July 9, 1918, ch. 143, subch. XX (1st par.), 40 Stat. 893; May 29, 1928, ch. 901 (par. 37), 45 Stat. 989; Aug. 1, 1953, ch. 305, Title VI, §645 (7th clause), 67 Stat. 357. |

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–232 renumbered section 4591 of this title as this section.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2018 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 115–232 effective Feb. 1, 2019, with provision for the coordination of amendments and special rule for certain redesignations, see section 800 of Pub. L. 115–232, set out as a note preceding section 3001 of this title.
§ 162.566 How will BIA decide whether to approve a WSR lease? ( a ) We will approve a WSR lease unless: ( 1 ) The required consents have not been obtained from the parties to the lease;
( 2 ) The requirements of this subpart have not been met; or
( 3 ) We find a compelling reason to withhold our approval in order to protect the best interests of the Indian landowners.
( b ) We will defer, to the maximum extent possible, to the Indian landowners' determination that the WSR lease is in their best interest.
( c ) We may not unreasonably withhold approval of a WSR lease.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 287 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 287

   To commend Serena Williams on winning the 1999 U.S. Open Women's 
                   Singles and Doubles championships.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 13, 1999

Ms. Carson (for herself, Mr. Watt of North Carolina, Mrs. Morella, Ms. 
Jackson-Lee of Texas, Mr. Cummings, Mrs. Capps, Mrs. Thurman, Mr. Lewis 
of Georgia, Ms. Lee, Ms. Kilpatrick, Mrs. Meek of Florida, Mr. Conyers, 
Mr. Rangel, Ms. Norton, Mr. Rush, Mr. Meeks of New York, Mr. Payne, Mr. 
  Wynn, Ms. DeLauro, Ms. Waters, Mr. Clay, Ms. Brown of Florida, Ms. 
Millender-McDonald, Ms. Berkley, Ms. McKinney, Mr. Clyburn, Mrs. Jones 
 of Ohio, Mr. Ford, Mr. Jefferson, Mr. Fattah, Mr. Owens, Mr. Bishop, 
 Mrs. Christensen, Mrs. Clayton, Mr. Hastings of Florida, Mr. Thompson 
  of Mississippi, Mr. Scott, Mr. Dixon, Mr. Hilliard, Mr. Jackson of 
  Illinois, Mr. Davis of Illinois, Mr. Towns, and Mrs. Maloney of New 
  York) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   To commend Serena Williams on winning the 1999 U.S. Open Women's 
                   Singles and Doubles championships.

Whereas on September 11, 1999, Serena Williams captured the U.S. Open Women's 
        Singles title at age 17 in only her second year as a pro;
Whereas Serena Williams finished the singles final with big serves and 8 aces, 
        pushing her tournament total to 62, 40 more aces than any other player;
Whereas one day after winning the Singles title, Serena teamed with her sister 
        Venus to win the U.S. Open Women's Doubles title;
Whereas Serena and Venus Williams received their early training from their 
        father, Richard, a security agency owner with no formal tennis training, 
        on public tennis courts in and around Compton, a suburb of Los Angeles, 
        California;
Whereas upon beating the No. 1 and No. 2 seeded women professional tennis 
        players to capture the U.S. Open title, Serena Williams moved up in the 
        rankings from No. 6 to No. 4;
Whereas at 17 years old, Serena joins an elite class that includes Margaret 
        Court, Billie Jean King, and Martina Navratilova as the only women who 
        have won the Singles, Doubles, and Mixed Doubles championships of the 
        U.S. Open in their career; and
Whereas Serena Williams is the first African-American woman to win a Grand Slam 
        title since Althea Gibson in 1958: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives commends Serena 
Williams on winning the 1999 U.S. Women's Open Singles and Doubles 
championships.
                                 <all>
```
NO. 07-06-0480-CR

	IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

	FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	AT AMARILLO

	PANEL B

	JANUARY 10, 2007

	______________________________

	EDWARD L. MARTINEZ,

									Appellant

	v.

	THE STATE OF TEXAS,

									Appellee

	_________________________________

	FROM THE 137TH DISTRICT COURT OF LUBBOCK COUNTY;

	NO. 2004-405,843; HON. CECIL G. PURYEAR, PRESIDING

	______________________________

	Memorandum Opinion

	______________________________

Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and HANCOCK, JJ.

	Edward L. Martinez (appellant) appeals from the findings of fact and conclusions of law rendered by the trial court after conducting a hearing pursuant to this court’s abatement order.   We dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

	The trial court held a hearing on November 6, 2006, pursuant to this court’s abatement order to determine whether appellant was represented on appeal and if not then whether he was entitled to appointed counsel.  The trial court, after conducting the hearing,  filed “Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law” as directed with the trial court clerk on November 6, 2006.  Appellant filed his notice of appeal from these findings on December 6, 2006.  On December 14, 2006, this court directed appellant “to file any documents or matters considered necessary for the Court to determine its appellate jurisdiction” with this Court no later than January 8, 2007.  To date appellant has failed to respond.

	The Court of Criminal Appeals, in Williams v. State, 780 S.W.2d 802, 803 (Tex. Crim. App.1989), held that "by entering an order merely abating an appeal a court of appeals does not 'decide a case,'” therefore, it is an interlocutory order which is not final nor appealable.  The trial court’s findings are a result of the abatement hearing and address matters directed by this court.  It, too, does not “decide” the case and therefore is interlocutory and non-appealable.

	Accordingly, we dismiss appellant’s appeal from the trial court’s findings issued from the November 6, 2006 abatement hearing.

							Per Curiam

Do not publish.
### Tectonic events at the intersection between the Hope Fault and the Purcell Trench, northern Idaho

By: Jack Edward HarrisonM. Dean KleinkopfJohn D. Obradovich

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/pp719

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plate:  **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
### §515. Reenlistment after discharge as warrant officer

A person who has been discharged from a regular component of an armed force under section 1165 or 1166 of this title may, upon his request and in the discretion of the Secretary concerned, be enlisted in that armed force in the grade prescribed by the Secretary. However, a person discharged under section 1165 of this title may not be enlisted in a grade lower than the grade that he held immediately before appointment as a warrant officer.

(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 19.)

| Revised section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 515 | 10:600d (last 36 words of last sentence).34:135d (last 36 words of last sentence).10:600m (last 21 words of 3d sentence).34:430a (last 21 words of 3d sentence). | May 29, 1954, ch. 249, §§6 (last 36 words of last sentence), 15 (last 21 words of 3d sentence), 68 Stat. 159, 164. |

34:135d (last 36 words of last sentence).

10:600m (last 21 words of 3d sentence).

34:430a (last 21 words of 3d sentence).

The first 20 words are inserted for clarity. The word "request" is substituted for the word "application".
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Start of the Korean War Remembered

By By Mr. George Markfelder JFHQNCRMDW

                WASHINGTON  –              

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More News/Articles
EX-35.3
(logo) WELLS FARGO

Corporate Trust Services
MAC R1204-010
9062 Old Annapolis Road
Columbia, MD 21045

Tel: 410 884 2000
Fax: 410 715 2380


GS Mortgage Securities Corporation II
200 West Street
New York, New York 10282


RE: Annual Statement as to Compliance

The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. ("Wells
Fargo"), hereby certifies as follows for the calendar year 2012:

(a) a review of Wells Fargo's activities as assigned and agreed to under the
servicing agreement(s) listed on Schedule A hereto (the "Servicing
Agreement(s)") has been made under my supervision; and

(b) to the best of my knowledge, based on such review Wells Fargo has fulfilled
all of its obligations under the Servicing Agreement(s) in all material
respects throughout the reporting period, except as noted in Schedule B.


March 15, 2013

/s/ Julie Eichler
JULIE EICHLER
Vice President


Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

(logo) Together we'll go far


(page)


(logo) WELLS FARGO

Corporate Trust Services
MAC R1204-010
9062 Old Annapolis Road
Columbia, MD 21045

Tel: 410 884 2000
Fax: 410 715 2380


To: GS Mortgage Securities Corporation II

Schedule A

List of Servicing Agreement(s) and Series

Pooling and Servicing Agreement for GS Mortgage Securities Corp. II Commercial
Mortgage Pass-ThroughCertificates, Series 2012-GC6, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. as
Trustee, as applicable.


Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.


(page)


(logo) WELLS FARGO

Corporate Trust Services
MAC R1204-010
9062 Old Annapolis Road
Columbia, MD 21045

Tel: 410 884 2000
Fax: 410 715 2380


To: GS Mortgage Securities Corporation II

Schedule A

List of Servicing Agreement(s) and Series

Pooling and Servicing Agreement for GS Mortgage Securities Corporation II
Commericial Mortgage Pass-ThroughCertificates, Series 2012-GCJ7, Wells Fargo
Bank, N.A. as Certificate Administrator, as applicable.


Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.


(page)


(logo) WELLS FARGO

Corporate Trust Services
MAC R1204-010
9062 Old Annapolis Road
Columbia, MD 21045

Tel: 410 884 2000
Fax: 410 715 2380


To: GS Mortgage Securities Corporation II

Schedule B

Material Instances of Non-Compliance

No instances to report


Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
§ 162.020 May a lease combine tracts with different Indian landowners? ( a ) We may approve a lease that combines multiple tracts of Indian land into a unit, if we determine that unitization is: ( 1 ) In the Indian landowners' best interest; and
( 2 ) Consistent with the efficient administration of the land.
( b ) For a lease that covers multiple tracts, the minimum consent requirements apply to each tract separately.
( c ) Unless the lease provides otherwise, the rent or other compensation will be prorated in proportion to the acreage each tract contributes to the entire lease. Once prorated per tract, the rent will be distributed to the owners of each tract based upon their respective percentage interest in that particular tract.
"

"

"

"

"

"

"

"

"

"

"

"

"

"

"

"

"

"

"

"

"

"

"

"

"

"

¡¢199

¡¢3

¡¢96

¡¢97

¥¦5

Hilt

Weed Etna

Yreka

Henley

Dorris

Hamburg

Orleans

Macdoel

Tennant

Callahan

Hornbrook

Scott Bar

Weitchpec

Oak Knoll

Ft. Jones

Somes Bar

Cecilville

Happy Camp

Sawyers Bar Mount Shasta

Seiad Valley

Forks of Salmon

!

! !

!

!

San

Francisco

Crescent

City

Portland

Klamath

Falls

Yreka

Klamath

National

Forest

Oregon

California

Klamath

Basin

NO SCALE

0 5 10 20

Miles

®

December 28, 2015

Craggy Vegetation Management Project

Vicinity Map

Klamath National Forest

Legend

Craggy Vegetation Management

Project Area, 29,500 Acres

Project Area
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

January 15, 2020

No. 04-20-00003-CR

IN RE Seth BATTERTON

Original Mandamus Proceeding1

ORDER

On January 2, 2020, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus. Because this court does not 

have jurisdiction to address relator’s complaint, the petition for writ of mandamus is dismissed for lack 

of jurisdiction. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a).

It is so ORDERED on January 15, 2020.

_____________________________

Irene Rios, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 15th day of January, 2020.

_____________________________

Michael A. Cruz, Clerk of Court

 1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 5970, styled The State of Texas v. Seth McCague Batterton, pending in the 

216th Judicial District Court, Gillespie County, Texas, the Honorable Rex Emerson presiding.
§ 1000.174 How and when does the bureau respond to a request to negotiate? ( a ) Within 15 days of receiving a Tribe's/Consortium's request to negotiate, the bureau will take the steps in this section. If more than one bureau is involved, a lead bureau must be designated to conduct negotiations.
( b ) If the program is contained on the section 405(c) list, the bureau will identify the lead negotiator(s) and awarding official(s) for executing the AFA.
( c ) If the program is potentially of a special geographic, cultural, or historic significance to a Tribe/Consortium, the bureau will schedule a pre-negotiation meeting with the Tribe/Consortium as soon as possible. The purpose of the meeting is to assist the bureau in determining if the program is available for negotiation.
( d ) Within 10 days after convening a meeting under paragraph (c) of this section: ( 1 ) If the program is available for negotiation, the bureau will identify the lead negotiator(s) and awarding official(s); or
( 2 ) If the program is unavailable for negotiation, the bureau will give to the Tribe/Consortium a written explanation of why the program is unavailable for negotiation.
### SUBCHAPTER I—JOINT POLICIES ON REQUIREMENTS DEFINITION, CONTINGENCY PROGRAM MANAGEMENT, AND CONTINGENCY CONTRACTING

Sec.
3151.
Joint policy requirement.
3152.
Requirements definition matters covered.
3153.
Contingency program management matters covered.
3154.
Contingency contracting matters covered.
3155.
Training for personnel outside acquisition workforce.
3156.
Mission readiness exercises.
3157.
Definitions; applicability.
# C_2013375EN.01000101.xml

| 20.12.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 375/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.12.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 375/1

---

Statement relating to Regulation (EU) No 1301/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 on the European Regional Development Fund and on specific provisions concerning the investment for growth and jobs goal and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1080/2006 (1)

1

2013/C 375/01

Statement by the Commission relating to Article 11(2)

Statement by the Commission relating to Article 11(2)

The Commission shares the objective expressed by the European Parliament of simplifying state aid procedures as regards operating aid granted to undertakings established in the outermost regions which are linked to the offsetting of the additional costs incurred in such regions as a result of their specific economic and social situation.

According to the proposal for the future General Block Exemption Regulation (GBER) as recently published by the Commission services, operating aid intended to compensate certain additional costs incurred by beneficiaries established in these regions would be considered compatible with the internal market, under the conditions stipulated therein, and would thus be exempted from notification under Article 108(3) TFEU. The Commission considers that this will provide a sound basis for achieving the simplification which is sought, and will take full account of all observations received from Member States in the ongoing consultation process in view of the adoption of the Regulation in 2014.

---

(1)  OJ L 347, 20.12.2013, p. 289.

1

---
#### § 166.231 Must an amendment, assignment, subpermit, or mortgage approved under a permit be recorded?

An amendment, assignment, subpermit, or mortgage approved under a permit must be recorded in our Land Titles and Records Office which has jurisdiction over the Indian land. We will record the document immediately following our approval.