alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2013240EN.01000101.xml

| 21.8.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 240/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.8.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 240/1

---

Communication from the Commission concerning the quantity not applied for to be added to the quantity fixed for the subperiod 1 January to 31 March 2014 under certain quotas opened by the European Union for poultrymeat products

2013/C 240/01

Commission Regulation (EC) No 616/2007 (1) opened tariff quotas for imports of products in the poultrymeat sector. The applications for import licences lodged during the first seven days of July 2013 for the subperiod 1 October to 31 December 2013 do not, for quotas 09.4212, 09.4217, 09.4218 and 09.4256, cover the quantities available. Pursuant to the second sentence of Article 7(4) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1301/2006 (2), the quantities that were not applied for are to be added to the quantity fixed for the following quota subperiod, from 1 January to 31 March 2014; they are set out in the Annex to this notice.

1

2

---

(1)  OJ L 142, 5.6.2007, p. 3.

1

(2)  OJ L 238, 1.9.2006, p. 13.

2

---

ANNEX

| Quota order number | Quantities not applied for, to be added to the quantity fixed for the subperiod 1 January to 31 March 2014
  (in kg) |
| --- | --- |
| 09.4212 | 31 223 920 |
| 09.4217 | 3 273 000 |
| 09.4218 | 6 957 600 |
| 09.4256 | 645 004 |

Quota order number

Quantities not applied for, to be added to the quantity fixed for the subperiod 1 January to 31 March 2014

(in kg)

09.4212

31 223 920

09.4217

3 273 000

09.4218

6 957 600

09.4256

645 004

---
§ 212.28 Unitization and communitization agreements, and well spacing. ( a ) For the purpose of promoting conservation and efficient utilization of minerals, the Secretary may approve a cooperative unit, drilling or other development plan on any leased area upon a determination that approval is advisable and in the best interest of the Indian mineral owner. For the purposes of this section, a cooperative unit, drilling or other development plan means an agreement for the development or operation of a specifically designated area as a single unit without regard to separate ownership of the land included in the agreement. Such cooperative agreements include, but are not limited to, unit agreements, communitization agreements and other types of agreements that allocate costs and benefits.
( b ) The consent of the Indian mineral owner to such unit or cooperative agreement shall not be required unless such consent is specifically required in the lease.
( c ) Requests for approval of cooperative agreements which comply with the requirements of all applicable rules and regulations shall be filed with the superintendent or area director.
( d ) All Indian mineral owners of any right, title or interest in the mineral resources to be included in a cooperative agreement must be notified by the lessee at the time the agreement is submitted to the superintendent or area director. An affidavit from the lessee stating that a notice was mailed to each mineral owner of record for whom the superintendent or area director has an address will satisfy this notice requirement.
( e ) A request for approval of a proposed cooperative agreement, and all documents incident to such agreement, must be filed with the superintendent or area director at least ninety (90) days prior to the first expiration date of any of the Indian leases in the area proposed to be covered by the cooperative agreement.
( f ) Unless otherwise provided in the cooperative agreement, approval of the agreement commits each lease to the unit in the area covered by the agreement on the date approved by the Secretary or the date of first production, whichever is earlier, as long as the agreement is approved before the lease expiration date.
( g ) Any lease committed in part to any such cooperative agreement shall be segregated into a separate lease or leases as to the lands committed and lands not committed to the agreement. Segregation shall be effective on the date the agreement is effective.
( h ) Wells shall be drilled in conformity with a well spacing program approved by the authorized officer.
#### John Doyle BYRD, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.

No. 14827.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Nov. 16, 1954.

*607N. Neil Andrews, Pierre Howard and Howard, Howard, Slaton & Holt, Atlanta, Ga., for appellant.

J. Robert Sparks, J. Ellis Mundy, Asst. U. S. Attys., James W. Dorsey, U. S. Atty., Atlanta, Ga., for appellee.

Before HUTCHESON, Chief Judge, and HOLMES and RUSSELL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Convicted of a violation of Internal Revenue laws, upon evidence obtained without a warrant of arrest or for search, and sentenced to imprisonment and to pay a fine, defendant has appealed, assigning as fundamental error the denial of his motion to suppress the evidence so obtained.

Conceding that if the action of the court denying the motion was not erroneous, the judgment should be affirmed, appellant is here insisting that it was, and the judgment must be reversed.

Marshaling the many authorities which hold without varying that a conviction obtained by the use of evidence secured by an unreasonable search may not stand, among them Roberson v. United States, 6 Cir., 165 F.2d 752, where the whole question is thoroughly canvassed and adequately and correctly dealt with, he urges upon us that the undisputed facts of record in connection with the hearing on the motion establish as matter of law that the search was unreasonable and forbidden, the order on the motion was error, and the judgment may not stand.

The United States, showing equal assiduity in searching and analyzing the-authorities and equal earnestness in insisting that the motion was correctly denied, urges upon us that the finding that the search was not unreasonable was correct, as matter of law, but, if not,, certainly as matter of fact, and the finding and order may not be set aside.

We do not find it necessary to determine, as we are urged to do, that the-denial of the motion was demanded as. matter of law because we are in no doubt that whether or not this is so, the finding that the search was not unreasonable certainly finds support in the evidence and that the district judge, to whose determination the fact question was properly submitted, Roberson v. United States, supra, had the right under the-evidence to find as he did.

Whatever might have been said of this case before the coming down of the-decision in United States v. Rabinowitz, 839 U.S. 56, 70 S.Ct. 430, 94 L.Ed. 653, and Brinegar v. United States, 338 U.S. 160, 69 S.Ct. 1302, 93 L.Ed. 1879, we think it clear that, under their teachings and the finding of the district judge, we are bound to hold; that the search was not unreasonable; that it was not error to deny the motion to suppress; and: that the judgment must, therefore, be-affirmed.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**

 

**OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Pacific Coast Oil Trust (the “Trust”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, not in its individual capacity but solely as the Trustee of the Trust, certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to its knowledge:

 

(1)         The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2)         The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.

 

The above certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.

 
|                        | The Bank of New York   Mellon Trust Company, N.A.,   Trustee for Pacific Coast Oil Trust |
|-----------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                        |                                                                                     |   |
| Date: March 10,   2017 | By:                                                                                      | /s/ SARAH NEWELL |
|                        |                                                                                     | Sarah Newell |
|                        | * *                                                                                 | *Vice   President and Trust Officer* |

 

----
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Clifford W. Taylor,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh
Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman,
Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk February 21, 2007 

# Order

February 21, 2007

129247 (40)(41)

RANEE LEE RAAB a nd RICHARD RAAB, Plaintiffs-Appellees,
SC: 129247-8 V COA: 254222, 256269
Montcalm CC: 02-H-1379-NH ROBERT F. JOYCE, D.O.,, Defendant-Appellant.

and

SHERIDAN COMMUNITY HOSPITAL,
Defendant.

___________________ ________________

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion by defenda nt-appellant for
immediate consideration is GRANTED. Th e motion to adjourn oral argument on the application for leave to appeal is considered and it is DENIED.
#### § 18.101 May a tribe create and adopt its own tribal probate code?

Yes. A tribe may create and adopt a tribal probate code.
Request for Additional Information: Davis & Floyd (FAA-2015-2821) (Corrected) 

9-AWA-AVS-333Exemptions (FAA) 

Dear Mr. Frank M. Rice: 

 

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition (Docket No. 

FAA−2015−2821). This information is necessary for the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to process your 

petition.

 

 Describe the aircraft make(s), model(s), and type(s) (i.e., fixed-wing, rotorcraft, lighter-than-air) for the 

proposed UAS operation. The description(s) should include the maximum weight (including payload). This 

information can be located in the aircraft manual(s).

 

Please submit the additional information (non-proprietary) to your docket at www.regulations.gov and submit any 

proprietary information to the FAA Headquarters or electronically via email to 333exemptions@faa.gov. If you want 

us to process your request any further, we must receive the information described above by October 31, 2015. If we do 

not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further.

 

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267-2999 .

 

Thank you for your interest in aviation safety. 

FAA Office of Rulemaking 

Sent: Friday, October 16, 2015 8:25 AM 

To: frice@davisfloyd.com
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Marines Land in Apra Harbor to Offload Tanks, Equipment

By Jeffrey Landis

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More News/Articles
§ 162.456 How will BIA decide whether to approve a sublease of a business lease? ( a ) We may disapprove a sublease of a business lease only if at least one of the following is true: ( 1 ) The Indian landowners have not consented and their consent is required;
( 2 ) The lessee's mortgagees or sureties have not consented;
( 3 ) The lessee is in violation of the lease;
( 4 ) The lessee will not remain liable under the lease;
( 5 ) The requirements of this subpart have not been met; or
( 6 ) We find a compelling reason to withhold our approval in order to protect the best interests of the Indian landowners.
( b ) In making the finding required by paragraph (a)(6) of this section, we may consider whether the value of any part of the leased premises not covered by the sublease would be adversely affected.
( c ) We will defer, to the maximum extent possible, to the Indian landowners' determination that the sublease is in their best interest.
( d ) We may not unreasonably withhold approval of a sublease.
§ 170.511 What activities are eligible for Tribal Transportation Facility Bridge funds? ( a ) The activities that are eligible for 23 U.S.C. 202(d) funding are: ( 1 ) Carrying out any planning, design, engineering, preconstruction, construction, and inspection of a bridge project to replace, rehabilitate, seismically retrofit, paint, apply calcium magnesium acetate, sodium acetate/formate, or other environmentally acceptable, minimally corrosive anti-icing and deicing composition; or
( 2 ) Implementing any countermeasure for deficient Tribal transportation facility bridges, including multiple-pipe culverts.
( b ) Further information regarding the use and availability of these funds can be found at 23 CFR part 661.
#### § 173.6 Stock grazing.

Permittees may graze upon lands covered by such permits, such stock as may be required in connection with the purposes for which the permit is issued subject to such restrictions and limitations as may be prescribed by the project engineer.
#### § 169.111 Must a right-of-way grant for tribal land provide for compensation reviews or adjustments?

For a right-of-way grant over or across tribal land, no periodic review of the adequacy of compensation or adjustment is required, unless the tribe negotiates for reviews or adjustments.
EXHIBIT 32.2



Statement of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Knight Trading Group, Inc. (the Company) for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), John B. Howard, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or, 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ JOHN B. HOWARDName:

John B. HowardTitle:

Chief Financial OfficerDate:

November 5, 2004




This
certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
• • Ir 

to a voluntary dismissal of this appeal. Cause appearing, we 

ORDER this appeal DISMISSED. 1 

cc: Hon. Patrick Flanagan, District Judge 

Washoe County Alternate Public Defender 

Attorney General/Carson City 

Washoe County District Attorney 

Washoe District Court Clerk 

James Lowell Venable 

'Because no remittitur will issue in this matter, see NRAP 42(b), the 

one-year period for filing a post-conviction habeas corpus petition under 

NRS 34.726(1) shall commence to run from the date of this order. 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

(0) 1947A 

2
**MIDLAND CAPITAL HOLDINGS CORPORATION****EXHIBIT 11****STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE**                   Three Months Ended  Six Months Ended   December 31,  December 31,   2007  2006  2007  2006                  Net Income $147,573  $171,486  $339,183  $392,726                               Weighted averagecommon sharesoutstanding for basiccomputation  372,600   372,600   372,600   372,600                               Basic earnings per share $0.40  $0.46  $0.91  $1.05                               Weighted averagecommon sharesoutstanding for basiccomputation  372,600   372,600   372,600   372,600                  Common stockequivalents due todilutive effect ofstock options  —   —   —   —                               Weighted averagecommon shares andequivalentsoutstanding fordiluted computation  372,600   372,600   372,600   372,600                               Diluted earnings per share $0.40  $0.46  $0.91  $1.05
Exhibit 32.2

                                  CERTIFICATION

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Graham Packaging Holdings
Company on Form 10-Q/A Amendment No. 1 for the period ended March 31, 2005 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, John E. Hamilton, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of Graham Packaging Holdings Company.

Date:  November 14, 2005


                            By: /s/ John E. Hamilton
                               -----------------------------------
                               John E. Hamilton
                               Chief Financial Officer



                                       1
<PAGE>
#### Nellie M. Hildreth, as Administratrix, etc., of Joseph D. Hildreth, Deceased, Respondent, v. The Mercantile Trust Company and Others, Appellants.

Interlocutory judgment affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Woodward, Jenks, Hooker, Gaynor and Miller, JJ., concurred.
EXHIBIT 32


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, the
undersigned officer of Hardwood Acquisition Corporation
 (the "Company"), hereby certify to my knowledge that:

The Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2011 of the Company fully complies, in all material respects,
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the
Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by
the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.


                             /s/ James Cassidy
                                 Chief Executive Officer
                                 Chief Financial Officer
Date: March 28, 2012
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-188817 and 333-194894 on Form F-3 and No. 333-187020 on Form S-8, of our report dated February 28, 2014, relating to the consolidated financial statements of GasLog Ltd. (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2013 and  for the two years in the period then ended, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 20-F of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2014.

/s/ Deloitte Hadjipavlou, Sofianos & Cambanis S.A.

Athens, Greece

March 25, 2015
# C_2013210EN.01000701.xml

| 24.7.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 210/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.7.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 210/7

---

Publication pursuant to Directive 2001/24/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the reorganisation and winding-up of credit institutions

Bank of Credit and Commerce International SA (BCCI SA) in compulsory liquidation — RCS Luxembourg No B 10370

and

BCCI Holdings (Luxembourg) SA (BCCI Holdings) in compulsory liquidation — RCS Luxembourg No B 12610

Both sociétés anonymes of Luxembourg law with registered office: 2, rue de la Chapelle, 1325 Luxembourg & PO Box 320, 2013 Luxembourg

NOTICE OF CLOSURE

2013/C 210/06

By judgment of this 5th of July 2013 the District Court of and in Luxembourg, Commercial Section, has ordered the closure of the liquidation of BCCI SA and BCCI Holdings after verification that all the available assets have been distributed to the beneficiaries. Release was granted to the liquidator for the liquidation operations up to the 21st of May 2013. For those of the beneficiaries whose available data did not permit the liquidator to remit to them the liquidation dividends or part of these, the assets corresponding to the undistributed dividends have been remitted, for their account, to the Caisse de Consignation in Luxembourg, 3, rue de St Esprit, 1475 Luxembourg, — e-mail: BCCI@ts.etat.lu — tel. +352 24782777 — fax +352 467262 — where these funds will be held at their disposal during the legal retention period.

Creditors of the UAE branches of BCCI SA and BCCI Holdings who did not receive remittance of their liquidation dividends or part of these can also contact the Central Bank PO Box 2255, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates — tel. +971 26663204 / +971 26915855 — fax +971 26667327 — e-mail: LiqUAE@cbuae.gov.ae

The books and files will be kept and will remain stored for the legal retention period of five years respectively six years at the following addresses:

| (a) | for the Luxembourg liquidations and the small branches in various jurisdictions: Team relocations SA registered in Luxembourg RCS B0024402, 112, rue de Kiem, 8030 Strassen;. |
| --- | --- |

(a)

for the Luxembourg liquidations and the small branches in various jurisdictions: Team relocations SA registered in Luxembourg RCS B0024402, 112, rue de Kiem, 8030 Strassen;.

| (b) | for the liquidation of the UAE branches: Central Bank PO Box 2255, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates;. |
| --- | --- |

(b)

for the liquidation of the UAE branches: Central Bank PO Box 2255, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates;.

| (c) | for the liquidation of the United Kingdom branches: Iron Mountain UK, Norman Road, Pickardy Manor Way, Belvedere, Kent, DA17 6JY, United Kingdom. |
| --- | --- |

(c)

for the liquidation of the United Kingdom branches: Iron Mountain UK, Norman Road, Pickardy Manor Way, Belvedere, Kent, DA17 6JY, United Kingdom.

Luxembourg, the 11th of July 2013.

The Liquidator: Jacques DELVAUX

---