alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-31 Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certification.

  Re: Morgan Stanley Capital I Inc., Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through
  Certificates, Series 2012-C4 (the "Transaction"), issued pursuant to the
  Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of March 1, 2012 (the "Pooling
  and Servicing Agreement"), executed in connection with the Transaction
  (capitalized terms used but not defined herein have the meanings set forth
  in the Pooling and Servicing Agreement).

  I, Steven Stern, certify that:

  1.I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D
    required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on
    Form 10-K of Morgan Stanley Capital I Trust 2012-C4 (the "Exchange Act
    periodic reports");

  2.Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a
    whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to
    state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
    the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
    with respect to the period covered by this report;

  3.Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
    information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
    covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

  4.Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement(s) required
    in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as
    disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have
    fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreements in all
    material respects; and

  5.All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria
    for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on
    assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed
    securities required to be included in this report in accordance with
    Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18
    have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise
    disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance
    described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form
    10-K.

    In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
    information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Bank
    of America, National Association as Master Servicer, Berkadia
    Commercial Mortgage LLC as Servicing Function Participant, Midland Loan
    Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association as Special
    Servicer, Pacific Life Insurance Company as Trust Advisor, Wells Fargo
    Bank, National Association, as Certificate Administrator and Wells Fargo
    Bank, National Association as Custodian.

    Date:  October 3, 2013
    By: /s/ Steven Stern
    Name: Steven Stern
    Title: President
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

STEEVEN R. WALTER

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 18

- 2827

[ April 11, 2019 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit,

Indian River County ; Cynthia L. Cox , Judge; L.T. Case No.

312017CF001470A

.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Mara C. Herbert, Assistant

Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

No appearance for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

T

AYLOR

, M AY and D AMOORGIAN

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
IV

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 351

Designating minority membership on certain standing committees of the

House.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

NOVEMBER 2, 1999

Mr. FROST submitted the following resolution; which was considered and

agreed to

RESOLUTION

Designating minority membership on certain standing

committees of the House.

1 Resolved, That the following named Member be, and

2 is hereby, elected to the following standing Committee of

3 the House of Representatives:

4 COMMITTEE ON BANKING AND FINANCIAL SERV5 ICES: Mr. Ackerman of New York to rank immediately

6 after Mr. Watt of North Carolina.

Æ
an appropriate alimony award); NRS 125B.020(1) (imposing a duty on all

parents to provide their children with necessary maintenance and support); 

### BMW v. Roth, 127 Nev. , 252 P.3d 649, 657 (2011) ("A district court would necessarily abuse its discretion if it based its ruling on an erroneous view of the law . . . ." (quotation omitted)).

Second, while the district court appears to have been attempting to afford respondent a lifestyle similar to that which he enjoyed during the marriage, this cannot be accomplished solely at the expense of the paying spouse. NRS 125.150(1)(a) (indicating that alimony must be awarded under terms that are "just and equitable"). Here, despite finding that "there are no issues as to the physical and mental condition of [respondent] as it related to the financial condition, health and ability to work," the district court awarded substantial alimony for a period of ten years. This award was made in spite of the fact that the district court "ha[d] concerns about the ability of [respondent] to manage his money." Thus, while it is not necessarily an abuse of discretion to award ten years of alimony to a spouse who has money-management problems and who is wholly capable of working, the district court's factual findings in this case simply do not support such an award.

Accordingly, we reverse the district court's alimony award, and remand this matter to the district court for further proceedings. On remand, the district court is instructed to exclude child support in determining any alimony award, and it is further instructed to ensure that there is a basis for the duration of any such award. NRS 125.150(8).

Appellant also seeks reversal of the district court's child support award. Because a child support award is dictated by a statutory formula driven by the paying parent's gross monthly income, 

### see NRS

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

(0) 1947A 2Oc--4001talcosiabareamin 

### , J. akitrz 

# i r , J.



# S tec-j44 4

.., 46 . 

### hut Parraguirre Cherry 

# 7

MINUMENNE 

### 125B.070; NRS 125B.080(1), and because we perceive no abuse of

discretion in the district court's finding that respondent's salary was $96,000 per year, we affirm the district court's child support award. Wallace v. Wallace, 112 Nev. 1015, 1019, 922 P.2d 541, 543 (1996) (indicating that child support matters are reviewed for an abuse of discretion). It is so ORDERED.

Hardesty

cc: Hon. Gayle Nathan, District Judge Carolyn Worrell, Settlement Judge Mary F. Granger Lance J. Hendron Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
(0) 1947A a. 

### 3
§ 162.029 How does BIA provide notice to the parties to a lease? ( a ) When this part requires us to notify the parties of the status of our review of a lease document (including but not limited to, providing notice to the parties of the date of receipt of a lease document, informing the parties of the need for additional review time, and informing the parties that a lease proposal package is not complete): ( 1 ) For leases of tribal land, we will notify the lessee and the tribe by mail; and
( 2 ) For leases of individually owned Indian land, we will notify the lessee by mail and, where feasible, the individual Indian landowners either by constructive notice or by mail.
( b ) When this part requires us to notify the parties of our determination to approve or disapprove a lease document, and to provide any right of appeal: ( 1 ) For leases of tribal land, we will notify the lessee and the tribe by mail; and
( 2 ) For leases of individually owned Indian land, we will notify the lessee by mail and the individual Indian landowners either by constructive notice or by mail.
# C_2013041EN.01000301.xml

| 13.2.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 41/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.2.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 41/3

---

Commission communication pursuant to Article 16(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community

Public service obligations in respect of scheduled air services

(Text with EEA relevance)

2013/C 41/03

| Member State | Italy |
| --- | --- |
| Concerned routes | Aosta–Rome Fiumicino and vice-versa |
| Date of entry into force of the public service obligations | 29 September 2013 |
| Address where the text and any information and/or documentation relating to the public service obligation can be obtained | For further information, please contact:





  Ente nazionale per l'aviazione civile (ENAC) |
| Direzione sviluppo trasporto aereo |
| Viale Castro Pretorio 118 |
| 00185 Roma RM |
| ITALIA |
| Tel. +39 0644596564 |
| Fax +39 0644596591 |
| E-mail: osp@enac.gov.it |
| Internet: http://www.mit.gov.it |
| (http://www.mit.gov.it/mit/site.php?c=normativa&o=vd&id=1566&ic_cat=&id_dett=0) |
| http://www.enac.gov.it |

Member State

Italy

Concerned routes

Aosta–Rome Fiumicino and vice-versa

Date of entry into force of the public service obligations

29 September 2013

Address where the text and any information and/or documentation relating to the public service obligation can be obtained

For further information, please contact:

Ente nazionale per l'aviazione civile (ENAC)

Direzione sviluppo trasporto aereo

Viale Castro Pretorio 118

00185 Roma RM

ITALIA

Tel. +39 0644596564

Fax +39 0644596591

E-mail: osp@enac.gov.it

Internet: http://www.mit.gov.it

(http://www.mit.gov.it/mit/site.php?c=normativa&o=vd&id=1566&ic_cat=&id_dett=0)

http://www.enac.gov.it

---
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

# PACFLT Commander Reaffirms Close Ties with Singapore, Thanks Sailors During Southeast Asia Visit 

By Task Force 73 Public Affairs 

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More News/Articles
IV

House Calendar No. 38

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 140

[Report No. 106–95]

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 1376) to extend the tax benefits

available with respect to services performed in a combat zone to services

performed in the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (Serbia/Montenegro)

and certain other areas, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 14, 1999

Mrs. MYRICK, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution;

which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

RESOLUTION

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 1376) to extend

the tax benefits available with respect to services performed in a combat zone to services performed in the

Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (Serbia/Montenegro) and

certain other areas, and for other purposes.

1 Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution

2 it shall be in order without intervention of any point of

3 order to consider in the House the bill (H.R. 1376) to

4 extend the tax benefits available with respect to services

5 performed in a combat zone to services performed in the
2

HRES 140 RH

1 Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (Serbia/Montenegro) and

2 certain other areas, and for other purposes. The bill shall

3 be considered as read for amendment. The amendment

4 recommended by the Committee on Ways and Means now

5 printed in the bill shall be considered as adopted. The pre6 vious question shall be considered as ordered on the bill,

7 as amended, to final passage without intervening motion

8 except: (1) one hour of debate on the bill, as amended,

9 equally divided and controlled by the chairman and rank10 ing minority member of the Committee on Ways and

11 Means; and (2) one motion to recommit with or without

12 instructions.

House Calendar No. 38

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 140

[Report No. 106–95]

RESOLUTION

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 1376)

areas, and for other purposes.slavia (Serbia/Montenegro) and certain otherices performed in the Federal Republic of Yugoto services performed in a combat zone to servto extend the tax benefits available with respect

APRIL 14, 1999

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be

printed
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS

ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Global Crossing Limited (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2009 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the report), I, John J. Legere, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       
|-----------------------
|Date: August 4, 2009   
|                       
|/S/ JOHN J. LEGERE     
|John J. Legere         
|Chief Executive Officer
REPUBLICA DE COLOMBIA 

AERONAUTICA CIVIL 

Unidad Administrativa Especial 

Bogota D.C., Abril 1 3 de 2010 

Senor 

BRIAN HEDBERG, Esq. 

Negotiator, The Americas 

U.S. Dept Of Transportation 

Office of International Aviation 

Tel. 202.366.7783 

Fax 202.366.3694 

Estados Unidos 

Respetado Senor Hedberg: 

La Aeronautica Civil de Colombia p~r solicitud de la aerolinea Tampa Cargo S.A. , la cual 

se encuentra autorizada para realizar un (1) vuelo charter en la ruta COLOMBIA 

(Bogota/Medellin/Cali/Barranquilla)-MIAMI-COLOMBIA-BRASIL (Belo Horizonte)-

COLOMBIA, ejerciendo derechos de quintas y sextas libertades entre Miami y Belo 

Horizonte, confirma al Departamento de Transporte de los Estados Unidos de America, 

que el Gobierno de Colombia podra aprobar, sobre la base de la reciprocidad, las 

solicitudes de aerolineas de carga de los Estados Unidos, para lIevar a cabo operaciones 

de vue los charter de trans porte de carga con derechos de trafico de quinta y sexta libertad 

del aire, en el entendimiento de que el Gobierno de los Estados Unidos apruebe 

solicitudes similares de aerolineas de carga destinadas p~r Colombia. 

Sin otro particular, reciba un cordial saludo 

Jef Oficina de Transporte Aereo 

Proyect6: Ma. Isabel Rojas 

Revis6: Claudia Esguerra Barragan $
### §3152. Requirements definition matters covered

The joint policy for requirements definition required by section 3151 of this title shall, at a minimum, provide for the following:

(1) The assignment of a senior commissioned officer or civilian member of the senior executive service, with appropriate experience and qualifications related to the definition of requirements to be satisfied through acquisition contracts (such as for delivery of products or services, performance of work, or accomplishment of a project), to act as head of requirements definition and coordination during combat operations, post-conflict operations, and contingency operations, if required, including leading a requirements review board involving all organizations concerned.

(2) An organizational approach to requirements definition and coordination during combat operations, post-conflict operations, and contingency operations that is designed to ensure that requirements are defined in a way that effectively implements United States Government and Department of Defense objectives, policies, and decisions regarding the allocation of resources, coordination of interagency efforts in the theater of operations, and alignment of requirements with the proper use of funds.

(Added and amended Pub. L. 116–283, div. A, title XVIII, §1810(a), (b)(2), Jan. 1, 2021, 134 Stat. 4162, 4163.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

The text of subsec. (b) of section 2333 of this title, which was transferred to this section and amended by Pub. L. 116–283, §1810(b)(2), was based on Pub. L. 109–364, div. A, title VIII, §854(a)(1), Oct. 17, 2006, 120 Stat. 2343.

#### Amendments

2021—Pub. L. 116–283, §1810(b)(2), transferred subsec. (b) of section 2333 of this title to this section and, in introductory provisions, struck out subsec. (b) designation and heading "Requirements Definition Matters Covered" at beginning and substituted "section 3151 of this title" for "subsection (a)".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section and amendment by Pub. L. 116–283 effective Jan. 1, 2022, with additional provisions for delayed implementation and applicability of existing law, see section 1801(d) of Pub. L. 116–283, set out as an Effective Date of 2021 Amendment note preceding section 3001 of this title.
#### STATE v. DAVIS

No. 14P90

Case below: 96 N.C.App. 513

Motion by the Attorney General to dismiss appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 1 March 1990. Petition by defendant for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 1 March 1990.
§ 170.115 What is a cultural site or area entry road? ( a ) A cultural site or area entry road is a public road that provides access to sites for cultural purposes as defined by Tribal traditions, which may include, for example: ( 1 ) Sacred and medicinal sites;
( 2 ) Gathering medicines or materials such as grasses for basket weaving; and
( 3 ) Other traditional activities, including, but not limited to, subsistence hunting, fishing and gathering.
( b ) A Tribal government may unilaterally designate a Tribal road as a cultural site or area entry road. A cultural site or area entry road designation is an entirely voluntary and internal decision made by the Tribe to help it and other public authorities manage, protect, and preserve access to locations that have cultural significance.
( c ) In order for a Tribal government to designate a non-tribal road as a cultural site or area entry road, it must enter into an agreement with the public authority having jurisdiction over the road.
( d ) Cultural site or area entry roads may be included in the NTTFI if they meet the definition of a TTP facility.
### §1117. Investment of assets of Fund

The Secretary of the Treasury shall invest such portion of the Fund as is not in the judgment of the Secretary of Defense required to meet current withdrawals. Such investments shall be in public debt securities with maturities suitable to the needs of the Fund, as determined by the Secretary of Defense, and bearing interest at rates determined by the Secretary of the Treasury, taking into consideration current market yields on outstanding marketable obligations of the United States of comparable maturities. The income on such investments shall be credited to and form a part of the Fund.

(Added Pub. L. 106–398, §1 [[div. A], title VII, §713(a)(1)], Oct. 30, 2000, 114 Stat. 1654, 1654A–184.)
### §502.1 Annual report on electromagnetic spectrum operations strategy of the Department of Defense

(a) In General.—At the same time as the President submits to Congress the budget of the President under section 1105(a) of title 31 for each of fiscal years 2025 through 2029, the Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the Chief Information Officer of the Department of Defense, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and the Secretary of each of the military departments, shall submit to the congressional defense committees an annual report on the Electromagnetic Spectrum Superiority Strategy of the Department of Defense.

(b) Contents of Report.—Each report required under subsection (a) shall include each of the following:

(1) A description and overview of—

(A) the electromagnetic spectrum strategy of the Department of Defense;

(B) how such strategy supports the national defense strategy under section 113(g) of this title; and

(C) the organizational structure assigned to oversee the development of the Department's electromagnetic spectrum strategy, requirements, capabilities, programs, and projects.

(2) A list of all the electromagnetic spectrum operations acquisition programs and research and development projects of the Department of Defense and a description of how each program or project supports the Department's electromagnetic spectrum strategy.

(3) For each unclassified program or project on the list required by paragraph (2)—

(A) the senior acquisition executive and organization responsible for oversight of the program or project;

(B) whether or not validated requirements exist for the program or project and, if such requirements do exist, the date on which the requirements were validated and the organizational authority that validated such requirements;

(C) the total amount of funding appropriated, obligated, and forecasted by fiscal year for the program or project, including the program element or procurement line number from which the program or project receives funding;

(D) the development or procurement schedule for the program or project;

(E) an assessment of the cost, schedule, and performance of the program or project as it relates to the program baseline for the program or project, as of the date of the submission of the report, and the original program baseline for such program or project, if such baselines are not the same;

(F) the technology readiness level of each critical technology that is part of the program or project;

(G) whether or not the program or project is redundant or overlaps with the efforts of another military department; and

(H) the capability gap that the program or project is being developed or procured to fulfill.

(4) A classified annex that contains the items described in subparagraphs (A) through (H) of paragraph (3) for each classified program or project on the list required by paragraph (2).

(Added Pub. L. 118–31, div. A, title XVI, §1682(a), Dec. 22, 2023, 137 Stat. 614.)

1 Another section 502 is set out in chapter 31 of this title.
#### § 171.105 Does this part apply to me?

This part applies to you if you own or lease land within an irrigation project where we assess fees and collect monies to administer, operate, maintain, and rehabilitate project facilities.