Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 33 / Thursday, February 17, 2011 / Proposed Rules 9273 

Code of Federal Regulations is proposed 

to be amended as follows: 

PART 103—FINANCIAL 

RECORDKEEPING AND REPORTING 

OF CURRENCY AND FINANCIAL 

TRANSACTIONS 

1. The authority citation for part 103 

is amended to read as follows: 

Authority: 12 U.S.C. 1829b and 1951–1959; 

31 U.S.C. 5311–5314, 5316–5332 Title III, 

secs. 311, 312, 313, 314, 319, 326, 352, Pub. 

L. 107–56, 115 Stat. 307. 

2. Subpart I of part 103 is amended by 

adding § 103.194 under an undesignated 

center heading to read as follows: 

Special Due Diligence for 

Correspondent Accounts and Private 

Banking Accounts 

§ 103.194 Special measures against the 

Lebanese Canadian Bank SAL 

(a) Definitions. For purposes of this 

section: 

(1) The Lebanese Canadian Bank SAL 

means all branches, offices, and 

subsidiaries of the Lebanese Canadian 

Bank operating in any jurisdiction. 

(2) Correspondent account has the 

same meaning as provided in 

§ 103.175(d)(1)(ii). 

(3) Covered financial institution has 

the same meaning as provided in 

§ 103.175(f)(1). 

(4) Subsidiary means a company of 

which more than 50 percent of the 

voting stock or analogous equity interest 

is owned by another company. 

(b) Requirements for covered financial 

institutions. (1) Prohibition on direct use 

of correspondent accounts. A covered 

financial institution shall terminate any 

correspondent account that is 

established, maintained, administered, 

or managed in the United States for, or 

on behalf of, the Lebanese Canadian 

Bank SAL. 

(2) Special due diligence of 

correspondent accounts to prohibit 

indirect use. (i) A covered financial 

institution shall apply special due 

diligence to its correspondent accounts 

that is reasonably designed to guard 

against their indirect use by the 

Lebanese Canadian Bank SAL. At a 

minimum, that special due diligence 

must include: 

(A) Notifying those correspondent 

account holders that the covered 

financial institution knows or has 

reason to know provide services to the 

Lebanese Canadian Bank SAL, that such 

correspondents may not provide the 

Lebanese Canadian Bank SAL with 

access to the correspondent account 

maintained at the covered financial 

institution; and 

(B) Taking reasonable steps to identify 

any indirect use of its correspondent 

accounts by the Lebanese Canadian 

Bank SAL, to the extent that such 

indirect use can be determined from 

transactional records maintained in the 

covered financial institution’s normal 

course of business. 

(ii) A covered financial institution 

shall take a risk-based approach when 

deciding what, if any, other due 

diligence measures it should adopt to 

guard against the indirect use of its 

correspondent accounts by the Lebanese 

Canadian Bank SAL. 

(iii) A covered financial institution 

that obtains knowledge that a 

correspondent account is being used by 

the foreign bank to provide indirect 

access to the Lebanese Canadian Bank 

SAL, shall take all appropriate steps to 

prevent such indirect access, including 

the notification of its correspondent 

account holder under paragraph 

(b)(2)(i)(A) of this section and, where 

necessary, terminating the 

correspondent account. 

(3) Recordkeeping and reporting. (i) A 

covered financial institution is required 

to document its compliance with the 

notice requirement set forth in 

paragraph (b)(2)(i)(A) of this section. 

(ii) Nothing in this section shall 

require a covered financial institution to 

report any information not otherwise 

required to be reported by law or 

regulation. 

Dated: February 9, 2011. 

James H. Freis, Jr., 

Director, Financial Crimes Enforcement 

Network. 

[FR Doc. 2011–3348 Filed 2–16–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4810–02–P 

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND 

SECURITY 

Coast Guard 

33 CFR Part 100 

[Docket No. USCG–2011–0046] 

RIN 1625–AA08 

Special Local Regulations for Marine 

Events; Severn River, Spa Creek and 

Annapolis Harbor, Annapolis, MD 

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS. 

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking. 

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to 

establish special local regulations 

during the swim segment of the 

‘‘TriRock Annapolis’’ triathlon, a marine 

event to be held on the waters of Spa 

Creek and Annapolis Harbor on May 14, 

2011. These special local regulations are 

necessary to provide for the safety of life 

on navigable waters during the event. 

This action is intended to temporarily 

restrict vessel traffic in a portion of the 

Potomac River during the event. 

DATES: Comments and related material 

must be received by the Coast Guard on 

or before March 21, 2011. Requests for 

public meetings must be received by the 

Coast Guard on or before the end of the 

comment period. 

See the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

for discussion of the anticipated 

effective date. 

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments 

identified by docket number USCG– 

2011–0046 using any one of the 

following methods: 

(1) Federal eRulemaking Portal: 

http://www.regulations.gov. 

(2) Fax: 202–493–2251. 

(3) Mail: Docket Management Facility 

(M–30), U.S. Department of 

Transportation, West Building Ground 

Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey 

Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590– 

0001. 

(4) Hand delivery: Same as mail 

address above, between 9 a.m. and 

5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except 

Federal holidays. The telephone number 

is 202–366–9329. 

To avoid duplication, please use only 

one of these four methods. See the 

‘‘Public Participation and Request for 

Comments’’ portion of the 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section 

below for instructions on submitting 

comments. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If 

you have questions on this proposed 

rule, call or e-mail Mr. Ronald Houck, 

U.S. Coast Guard Sector Baltimore, MD; 

telephone 410–576–2674, e-mail 

Ronald.L.Houck@uscg.mil. If you have 

questions on viewing or submitting 

material to the docket, call Renee V. 

Wright, Program Manager, Docket 

Operations, telephone 202–366–9826. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Public Participation and Request for 

Comments 

We encourage you to participate in 

this rulemaking by submitting 

comments and related materials. All 

comments received will be posted 

without change to http:// 

www.regulations.gov and will include 

any personal information you have 

provided. 

Submitting Comments 

If you submit a comment, please 

include the docket number for this 

rulemaking (USCG–2011–0046), 

indicate the specific section of this 

document to which each comment 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
9274 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 33 / Thursday, February 17, 2011 / Proposed Rules 

applies, and provide a reason for each 

suggestion or recommendation. You 

may submit your comments and 

material online (via http:// 

www.regulations.gov) or by fax, mail, or 

hand delivery, but please use only one 

of these means. If you submit a 

comment online via http:// 

www.regulations.gov, it will be 

considered received by the Coast Guard 

when you successfully transmit the 

comment. If you fax, hand deliver, or 

mail your comment, it will be 

considered as having been received by 

the Coast Guard when it is received at 

the Docket Management Facility. We 

recommend that you include your name 

and a mailing address, an e-mail 

address, or a telephone number in the 

body of your document so that we can 

contact you if we have questions 

regarding your submission. 

To submit your comment online, go to 

http://www.regulations.gov, click on the 

‘‘submit a comment’’ box, which will 

then become highlighted in blue. In the 

‘‘Document Type’’ drop down menu 

select ‘‘Proposed Rule’’ and insert 

‘‘USCG–2011–0046’’ in the ‘‘Keyword’’ 

box. Click ‘‘Search’’ then click on the 

balloon shape in the ‘‘Actions’’ column. 

If you submit your comments by mail or 

hand delivery, submit them in an 

unbound format, no larger than 81⁄2 by 

11 inches, suitable for copying and 

electronic filing. If you submit 

comments by mail and would like to 

know that they reached the Facility, 

please enclose a stamped, self-addressed 

postcard or envelope. We will consider 

all comments and material received 

during the comment period and may 

change the rule based on your 

comments. 

Viewing Comments and Documents 

To view comments, as well as 

documents mentioned in this preamble 

as being available in the docket, go to 

http://www.regulations.gov, click on the 

‘‘read comments’’ box, which will then 

become highlighted in blue. In the 

‘‘Keyword’’ box insert ‘‘USCG–2011– 

0046’’ and click ‘‘Search.’’ Click the 

‘‘Open Docket Folder’’ in the ‘‘Actions’’ 

column. You may also visit the Docket 

Management Facility in Room W12–140 

on the ground floor of the Department 

of Transportation West Building, 1200 

New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, 

DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., 

Monday through Friday, except Federal 

holidays. We have an agreement with 

the Department of Transportation to use 

the Docket Management Facility. 

Privacy Act 

Anyone can search the electronic 

form of comments received into any of 

our dockets by the name of the 

individual submitting the comment (or 

signing the comment, if submitted on 

behalf of an association, business, labor 

union, etc.). You may review a Privacy 

Act notice regarding our public dockets 

in the January 17, 2008, issue of the 

Federal Register (73 FR 3316). 

Public Meeting 

We do not now plan to hold a public 

meeting. But you may submit a request 

for one on or before the end of the 

comment period, using one of the four 

methods specified under ADDRESSES. 

Please explain why you believe a public 

meeting would be beneficial. If we 

determine that one would aid this 

rulemaking, we will hold one at a time 

and place announced by a later notice 

in the Federal Register. 

Basis and Purpose 

On Saturday, May 14, 2011, 

Competitor Group Inc. of San Diego, 

California, will sponsor the ‘‘TriRock 

Annapolis’’ triathlon in Annapolis, 

Maryland. The swim segment of the 

event will occur from 7 a.m. to 8:30 a.m. 

and will be located in Spa Creek and 

Annapolis Harbor. Up to 2,000 

swimmers will operate on a 500-meter 

course located between the Annapolis 

City Dock and the confluence of the Spa 

Creek with the Severn River. The 

swimmers will be supported by 

sponsor-provided watercraft. The start 

and finish will be located at the 

Annapolis City Dock. A portion of the 

swim course will impede the Federal 

navigation channel. Due to the need for 

vessel control during the event, the 

Coast Guard would temporarily restrict 

vessel traffic in the event area to provide 

for the safety of participants, spectators 

and other transiting vessels. 

Discussion of Proposed Rule 

The Coast Guard proposes to establish 

temporary special local regulations on 

specified waters of Spa Creek and 

Annapolis Harbor. The regulations 

would be in effect from 6 a.m. to 9 a.m. 

on May 14, 2011. The regulated area, 

approximately 900 yards in length, 

would extend across the entire width of 

Spa Creek and Annapolis Harbor, 

within lines connecting the following 

positions: From position latitude 

38°58′34′′ N, longitude 076°29′05′′ W, 

thence to position latitude 38°58′27′′ N, 

longitude 076°28′55′′ W, and from 

position latitude 38°58′53′′ N, longitude 

076°28′34′′ W to position latitude 

38°58′21′′ N, longitude 076°28′26′′ W. 

The effect of this proposed rule would 

be to restrict general navigation in the 

regulated area during the event. These 

regulations are needed to control vessel 

traffic during the event to enhance the 

safety of participants, spectators and 

transiting vessels. 

Regulatory Analyses 

We developed this proposed rule after 

considering numerous statutes and 

executive orders related to rulemaking. 

Below we summarize our analyses 

based on 13 of these statutes or 

executive orders. 

Regulatory Planning and Review 

This proposed rule is not a significant 

regulatory action under section 3(f) of 

Executive Order 12866, Regulatory 

Planning and Review, and does not 

require an assessment of potential costs 

and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that 

Order. The Office of Management and 

Budget has not reviewed it under that 

Order. We expect the economic impact 

of this proposed rule to be so minimal 

that a full Regulatory Evaluation under 

the regulatory policies and procedures 

of DHS is unnecessary. Although this 

regulation will prevent traffic from 

transiting a portion of Spa Creek and 

Annapolis Harbor during the event, the 

effect of this regulation will not be 

significant due to the limited duration 

that the regulated area will be in effect 

and the extensive advance notifications 

that will be made to the maritime 

community via the Local Notice to 

Mariners and marine information 

broadcasts, so mariners can adjust their 

plans accordingly. 

Small Entities 

Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act 

(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered 

whether this proposed rule would have 

a significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities. 

The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises 

small businesses, not-for-profit 

organizations that are independently 

owned and operated and are not 

dominant in their fields, and 

governmental jurisdictions with 

populations of less than 50,000. 

The Coast Guard certifies under 5 

U.S.C. 605(b) that this proposed rule 

would not have a significant economic 

impact on a substantial number of small 

entities. This proposed rule would affect 

the following entities, some of which 

might be small entities: The owners or 

operators of vessels intending to transit 

or anchor in the effected portions of Spa 

Creek and Annapolis Harbor during the 

event. 

Although this regulation prevents 

traffic from transiting a portion of the 

Spa Creek and Annapolis Harbor during 

the event, this proposed rule will not 

have a significant economic impact on 

a substantial number of small entities 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 33 / Thursday, February 17, 2011 / Proposed Rules 9275 

for the following reasons: Though the 

regulated area extends across the entire 

width of the waterway, this proposed 

rule would be in effect for only a limited 

period; and before the enforcement 

period, we will issue maritime 

advisories so mariners can adjust their 

plans accordingly. All Coast Guard 

vessels enforcing this regulated area can 

be contacted on marine band radio 

VHF–FM channel 16 (156.8 MHz). 

If you think that your business, 

organization, or governmental 

jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity 

and that this rule would have a 

significant economic impact on it, 

please submit a comment (see 

ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it 

qualifies and how and to what degree 

this rule would economically affect it. 

Assistance for Small Entities 

Under section 213(a) of the Small 

Business Regulatory Enforcement 

Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121), 

we want to assist small entities in 

understanding this proposed rule so that 

they can better evaluate its effects on 

them and participate in the rulemaking. 

If the rule would affect your small 

business, organization, or governmental 

jurisdiction and you have questions 

concerning its provisions or options for 

compliance, please contact Coast Guard 

Sector Baltimore, MD. The Coast Guard 

will not retaliate against small entities 

that question or complain about this 

proposed rule or any policy or action of 

the Coast Guard. 

Collection of Information 

This proposed rule would call for no 

new collection of information under the 

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 

U.S.C. 3501–3520.). 

Federalism 

A rule has implications for federalism 

under Executive Order 13132, 

Federalism, if it has a substantial direct 

effect on State or local governments and 

would either preempt State law or 

impose a substantial direct cost of 

compliance on them. We have analyzed 

this proposed rule under that Order and 

have determined that it does not have 

implications for federalism. 

Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires 

Federal agencies to assess the effects of 

their discretionary regulatory actions. In 

particular, the Act addresses actions 

that may result in the expenditure by a 

State, local, or Tribal government, in the 

aggregate, or by the private sector of 

$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or 

more in any one year. Though this 

proposed rule would not result in such 

an expenditure, we do discuss the 

effects of this rule elsewhere in this 

preamble. 

Taking of Private Property 

This proposed rule would not cause a 

taking of private property or otherwise 

have taking implications under 

Executive Order 12630, Governmental 

Actions and Interference with 

Constitutionally Protected Property 

Rights. 

Civil Justice Reform 

This proposed rule meets applicable 

standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of 

Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice 

Reform, to minimize litigation, 

eliminate ambiguity, and reduce 

burden. 

Protection of Children 

We have analyzed this proposed rule 

under Executive Order 13045, 

Protection of Children from 

Environmental Health Risks and Safety 

Risks. This rule is not an economically 

significant rule and would not create an 

environmental risk to health or risk to 

safety that might disproportionately 

affect children. 

Indian Tribal Governments 

This proposed rule does not have 

Tribal implications under Executive 

Order 13175, Consultation and 

Coordination with Indian Tribal 

Governments, because it would not have 

a substantial direct effect on one or 

more Indian Tribes, on the relationship 

between the Federal Government and 

Indian Tribes, or on the distribution of 

power and responsibilities between the 

Federal Government and Indian Tribes. 

Energy Effects 

We have analyzed this proposed rule 

under Executive Order 13211, Actions 

Concerning Regulations That 

Significantly Affect Energy Supply, 

Distribution, or Use. We have 

determined that it is not a ‘‘significant 

energy action’’ under that order because 

it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ 

under Executive Order 12866 and is not 

likely to have a significant adverse effect 

on the supply, distribution, or use of 

energy. The Administrator of the Office 

of Information and Regulatory Affairs 

has not designated it as a significant 

energy action. Therefore, it does not 

require a Statement of Energy Effects 

under Executive Order 13211. 

Technical Standards 

The National Technology Transfer 

and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15 

U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use 

voluntary consensus standards in their 

regulatory activities unless the agency 

provides Congress, through the Office of 

Management and Budget, with an 

explanation of why using these 

standards would be inconsistent with 

applicable law or otherwise impractical. 

Voluntary consensus standards are 

technical standards (e.g., specifications 

of materials, performance, design, or 

operation; test methods; sampling 

procedures; and related management 

systems practices) that are developed or 

adopted by voluntary consensus 

standards bodies. 

This proposed rule does not use 

technical standards. Therefore, we did 

not consider the use of voluntary 

consensus standards. 

Environment 

We have analyzed this proposed rule 

under Department of Homeland 

Security Management Directive 023–01 

and Commandant Instruction 

M16475.lD, which guide the Coast 

Guard in complying with the National 

Environmental Policy Act of 1969 

(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and 

have made a preliminary determination 

that this action is one of a category of 

actions which do not individually or 

cumulatively have a significant effect on 

the human environment. This rule is 

categorically excluded, under figure 

2–1, paragraph (34)(h), of the 

Instruction. This proposed rule involves 

implementation of regulations within 33 

CFR Part 100 applicable to organized 

marine events on the navigable waters 

of the United States that could 

negatively impact the safety of 

waterway users and shore side activities 

in the event area. The category of water 

activities includes but is not limited to 

sail boat regattas, boat parades, power 

boat racing, swimming events, crew 

racing, canoe and sail board racing. We 

seek any comments or information that 

may lead to the discovery of a 

significant environmental impact from 

this proposed rule. 

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 100 

Marine safety, Navigation (water), 

Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements, Waterways. 

For the reasons discussed in the 

preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to 

amend 33 CFR part 100 as follows: 

PART 100—SAFETY OF LIFE ON 

NAVIGABLE WATERS 

1. The authority citation for part 100 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1233. 

2. Add § 100.35–T05–0046 to read as 

follows: 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
9276 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 33 / Thursday, February 17, 2011 / Proposed Rules 

§ 100.35–T05–0046 Special Local 

Regulations for Marine Events; Severn 

River, Spa Creek and Annapolis Harbor, 

Annapolis, MD. 

(a) Regulated area. The following 

location is a regulated area: All waters 

of the Spa Creek and Annapolis Harbor, 

within lines connecting the following 

positions: From position latitude 

38°58′34′′ N, longitude 076°29′05′′ W, 

thence to position latitude 38°58′27′′ N, 

longitude 076°28′55′′ W, and from 

position latitude 38°58′53′′ N, longitude 

076°28′34′′ W to position latitude 

38°58′21′′ N, longitude 076°28′26′′ W. 

All coordinates reference Datum NAD 

1983. 

(b) Definitions: (1) Coast Guard Patrol 

Commander means a commissioned, 

warrant, or petty officer of the U.S. 

Coast Guard who has been designated 

by the Commander, Coast Guard Sector 

Baltimore. 

(2) Official Patrol means any vessel 

assigned or approved by Commander, 

Coast Guard Sector Baltimore with a 

commissioned, warrant, or petty officer 

on board and displaying a Coast Guard 

ensign. 

(c) Special local regulations: (1) The 

Coast Guard Patrol Commander may 

forbid and control the movement of all 

vessels and persons in the regulated 

area. When hailed or signaled by an 

official patrol vessel, a vessel or person 

in the regulated area shall immediately 

comply with the directions given. 

Failure to do so may result in expulsion 

from the area, citation for failure to 

comply, or both. 

(2) All Coast Guard vessels enforcing 

this regulated area can be contacted on 

marine band radio VHF–FM channel 16 

(156.8 MHz). 

(3) The Coast Guard will publish a 

notice in the Fifth Coast Guard District 

Local Notice to Mariners and issue a 

marine information broadcast on VHF– 

FM marine band radio announcing 

specific event date and times. 

(d) Enforcement period: This section 

will be enforced from 6 a.m. until 9 a.m. 

on May 14, 2011. 

Dated: February 3, 2011. 

Brian W. Roche, 

Commander, U.S. Coast Guard, Acting 

Captain of the Port Baltimore. 

[FR Doc. 2011–3570 Filed 2–16–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9110–04–P 

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND 

SECURITY 

Coast Guard 

33 CFR Parts 154 and 155 

[Docket No. USCG–1998–4354 and USCG– 

1999–5705] 

RIN 2115–AE87 and 2115–AE88 

Tank Vessel and Marine 

Transportation-Related Facility 

Response Plans for Hazardous 

Substances 

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS. 

ACTION: Proposed rules; reopening of 

comment period. 

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is reopening 

the comment periods on two proposed 

rules before issuing final rules regarding 

Tank Vessel Response Plans for 

Hazardous Substances (USCG–1998– 

4354) and Marine TransportationRelated Facility Response Plans for 

Hazardous Substances (USCG–1999– 

5705). The Coast Guard previously 

published two notices of proposed 

rulemaking (NPRMs) proposing to 

require response plans for certain tank 

vessels operating on the navigable 

waters of the United States, as well as 

marine transportation-related facilities, 

that could reasonably be expected to 

cause substantial harm to the 

environment by discharging a hazardous 

substance. The proposed regulations 

were published to implement the 

requirements put into place by the Oil 

Pollution Act of 1990, but were never 

published as final rules. Because of the 

lapse in time since the NPRM 

publications, the Coast Guard is 

reopening the comment period to allow 

for any additional or updated comments 

from the public before publishing the 

final rules. 

DATES: Comments and related material 

must either be submitted to the 

appropriate online docket via http:// 

www.regulations.gov on or before May 

18, 2011 or reach the Docket 

Management Facility by that date. 

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments 

identified by docket number USCG– 

1998–4354 and/or USCG–1999–5705 

using any one of the following methods: 

(1) Federal eRulemaking Portal: 

http://www.regulations.gov. 

(2) Fax: 202–493–2251. 

(3) Mail: Docket Management Facility 

(M–30), U.S. Department of 

Transportation, West Building Ground 

Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey 

Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590– 

0001. 

(4) Hand delivery: Same as mail 

address above, between 9 a.m. and 5 

p.m., Monday through Friday, except 

Federal holidays. The telephone number 

is 202–366–9329. 

To avoid duplication, please use only 

one of these four methods. See the 

‘‘Public Participation and Request for 

Comments’’ portion of the 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section 

below for instructions on submitting 

comments. Please submit comments to 

the appropriate docket; if your 

comments apply to both proposed rules, 

please submit them to both dockets. 

Viewing incorporation by reference 

material: You may inspect the material 

proposed for incorporation by reference 

at room 2100, U.S. Coast Guard 

Headquarters, 2100 Second Street, SW., 

Washington, DC 20593–0001 between 

9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through 

Friday, except Federal holidays. The 

telephone number is 202–267–6716. 

Copies of the material are available as 

indicated in the ‘‘Incorporation by 

Reference’’ section of this preamble. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If 

you have questions on this proposed 

rule, call or e-mail Raymond Martin, 

Coast Guard; telephone 202–372–1449, 

e-mail Raymond.W.Martin@uscg.mil. If 

you have questions on viewing or 

submitting material to the docket, call 

Renee V. Wright, Program Manager, 

Docket Operations, telephone 202–366– 

9826. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Public Participation and Request for 

Comments 

We encourage you to participate in 

this rulemaking by submitting 

comments and related materials. All 

comments received will be posted 

without change to http:// 

www.regulations.gov and will include 

any personal information you have 

provided. 

A. Submitting Comments 

If you submit a comment, please 

include the docket number for this 

rulemaking (USCG–1998–4354 and/or 

USCG–1999–5705), indicate the specific 

section of this document to which each 

comment applies, and provide a reason 

for each suggestion or recommendation. 

You may submit your comments and 

material online or by fax, mail, or hand 

delivery, but please use only one of 

these means. We recommend that you 

include your name and a mailing 

address, an e-mail address, or a phone 

number in the body of your document 

so that we can contact you if we have 

questions regarding your submission. 

To submit your comment online, go to 

http://www.regulations.gov, click on the 

‘‘submit a comment’’ box, which will 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS