alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsManned Versus Unmanned Risk and Complexity Considerations for Future Midsized X-PlanesThe objective of this work was to identify and estimate complexity and risks associated with the development and testing of new low-cost medium-scale X-plane aircraft primarily focused on air transport operations. Piloting modes that were evaluated for this task were manned, remotely piloted, and unmanned flight research programs. This analysis was conducted early in the data collection period for X-plane concept vehicles before preliminary designs were complete. Over 50 different aircraft and system topics were used to evaluate the three piloting control modes. Expert group evaluations from a diverse set of pilots, engineers, and other experts at Aeronautics Research Mission Directorate centers within the National Aeronautics and Space Administration provided qualitative reasoning on the many issues surrounding the decisions regarding piloting modes. The group evaluations were numerically rated to evaluate each topic quantitatively and were used to provide independent criteria for vehicle complexity and risk. An Edwards Air Force Base instruction document was identified that emerged as a source of the effects found in our qualitative and quantitative data. The study showed that a manned aircraft was the best choice to align with test activities for transport aircraft flight research from a low-complexity and low-risk perspective. The study concluded that a manned aircraft option would minimize the risk and complexity to improve flight-test efficiency and bound the cost of the flight-test portion of the program. Several key findings and discriminators between the three modes are discussed in detail.Document ID20170010152Acquisition SourceArmstrong Flight Research CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsLechniak, Jason A.*(NASA Armstrong Flight Research Center Edwards, CA, United States)*Melton, John E.*(NASA Ames Research Center Moffett Field, CA, United States)*Date AcquiredOctober 18, 2017Publication DateSeptember 1, 2017Subject CategoryAeronautics (General)Report/Patent NumberAFRC-E-DAA-TN44856NASA/TM-2017-219541Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Keywordsquanitive analysisx-planesUASAvailable DownloadsNameType20170010152.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsIDRelationTitle20170005544See AlsoManned versus Unmanned Risk and Complexity Considerations for Future Midsized X-Planes20170005542See AlsoManned Versus Unmanned Risk and Complexity Considerations for Future Midsized X-Planesvisibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
```
**Exhibit 31.1**
                                  CERTIFICATION

I, James Meier, CEO and CFO, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Meier Worldwide
Intermedia, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
registrant and we have:

        a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant is made known to us
by others within the Corporation, particularly during the period in which this
quarterly report is being prepared;

        b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

        c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

        a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

        b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date:  March 15, 2004

/s/ James Meier
    James Meier
    President, CEO and Chief Accounting Officer
```
### §1433. Mental incompetency of member

If a person who would be entitled to make an election under section 1431 or 1432 of this title is determined to be mentally incompetent by medical officers of the armed force concerned or of the Department of Veterans Affairs, or by a court of competent jurisdiction, and for that reason cannot make the election within the prescribed time, the Secretary concerned may make an election for that person upon the request of his spouse or, if there is no spouse, of his children who would be eligible to be made beneficiaries under section 1435 of this title. If the person for whom the Secretary has made an election is later determined to be mentally competent by medical officers of the Department of Veterans Affairs or by a court of competent jurisdiction, he may, within 180 days after that determination, change or revoke that election. However, deductions made from his retired or retainer pay before that date may not be refunded.

(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 109; Pub. L. 101–189, div. A, title XVI, §1621(a)(1), Nov. 29, 1989, 103 Stat. 1602.)

| Revised section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1433 | 37:372 (less (a) and (b)). | Aug. 8, 1953, ch. 393, §3 (less (a) and (b)), 67 Stat. 502. |

The first 19 words are substituted for 37:372(c) (1st 9 words). The words "who would be eligible to be made beneficiaries under section 1435 of this title" are inserted to reflect the limitations in 37:371(f). The words "for that reason cannot" are substituted for the words "because of such mental incompetency is incapable of". The words "or is adjudged mentally incompetent", "provided for in this section", and "where appropriate is subsequently adjudged mentally competent" are omitted as surplusage. The last sentence is substituted for 37:372(c) (last sentence).

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1989—Pub. L. 101–189 substituted "Department of Veterans Affairs" for "Veterans' Administration" in two places.
ft. from Line, ft. from Line, Sec. R

County Elevation

Completed as

For Vertical Well: Total depth ft. Plugged back to

For Horizontal or Directionally Drilled Well: Enter well bore and bottom hole location data on page 2 of this form.

For coal bed natural gas well: Static water level ft. below reference elevation of ft.

Well is producing from formation(s) or pool(s).

I.P. barrels of oil, MCF of gas, and barrels of water per hours.

Holes per

foot Size and Type Open or IsolatedBottom (method of isolation)

Acidized, Shot, Fraced, Squeezed, or Cemented

Well Bore Interval

Top Bottom Treatment Type Amount and Type of Material Max. Rate Max. Pressure

(BBLS/Min) (PSI)

Perforated or Open-hole Intervals

Open Hole/Perf'd Zone

Top

String

Type Size Weight Grade (MD, Feet)

To Well Bore

Date Completed

Casing and Tubing Record

The information given herewith is a complete and correct record of the well as of the date of preparation.

ft.

Signed

(Oil, gas, cbm, injection, dry hole, etc.)

Title Date

(MD, Feet)

From

(MD, Feet)

Telephone

(Feet) (MD, Feet)

Cement Top

Date Spud

Cement Packer Set

(Sacks)

Length

(Surface) (KB)

T

(E/W)

API # 25 - -

Lease

(SUBMIT IN TRIPLICATE)

TO

Address

Company Well No.

Well Bore

Surface Location:

(N/S)

MONTANA BOARD OF OIL AND GAS CONSERVATION

2535 ST. JOHNS AVENUE

BILLINGS, MONTANA 59102

ARM 36.22.302

ARM 36.22.307

ARM 36.22.1011

ARM 36.22.1013

ARM 36.22.1414

COMPLETION REPORT

Field or Area

Form No. 4 R10/09

LOCATE WELL CORRECTLY
Initial 10-day average production /day (if taken)

Pressures (if measured): Tubing psi flowing: psi shut-in

Casing psi flowing: psi shut-in

Formation Volume Factor Porosity % Water Saturation %

Type Of Trap Producing Mechanism

TVD

Geological Markers

Top

MD

Formation Top

MD TVD

N/S

Kick-off Total Depth

MD TVD Twp Rng

Location, T-R-S

Bottom Hole Locations

Formation

Log Type

S.I.P. Cushion Recovery

Logs

Core #

Interval

From To Recovery

Cores

Interval

From To

DST #

From To

F.P. Interval Tool Open

(Min.)

Shut-in

(Min.)

Drill Stem Tests

E/W

Well Bore

Feet

From N/S Line From E/W Line

MD From (Well bore) Sec. N / S Feet E / W
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                5

<S>                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                        9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                    DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                         SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                    41,901
<SECURITIES>                              24,390
<RECEIVABLES>                             19,137
<ALLOWANCES>                               1,025
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                          88,823
<PP&E>                                    44,814
<DEPRECIATION>                            13,308
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           161,286
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                     17,536
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                     316
<OTHER-SE>                               140,337
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>             161,286
<SALES>                                   58,073
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                          58,073
<CGS>                                     12,066
<TOTAL-COSTS>                             63,222
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             709
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            56
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (2,953)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  87
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (3,040)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                              (3,040)
<EPS-BASIC>                              (0.10)
<EPS-DILUTED>                              (0.10)



</TABLE>
### §10202. Regulations

(a) Subject to standards, policies, and procedures prescribed by the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of each military department shall prescribe such regulations as the Secretary considers necessary to carry out provisions of law relating to the reserve components under the Secretary's jurisdiction.

(b) The Secretary of Homeland Security, with the concurrence of the Secretary of the Navy, shall prescribe such regulations as the Secretary considers necessary to carry out all provisions of law relating to the reserve components insofar as they relate to the Coast Guard, except when the Coast Guard is operating as a service in the Navy.

(c) So far as practicable, regulations for all reserve components shall be uniform.

(Added Pub. L. 103–337, div. A, title XVI, §1661(a)(1), Oct. 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 2976; amended Pub. L. 107–296, title XVII, §1704(b)(1), Nov. 25, 2002, 116 Stat. 2314.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

Provisions similar to those in this section were contained in section 280 of this title, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 103–337, §1661(a)(2)(A).

#### Amendments

2002—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 107–296 substituted "of Homeland Security" for "of Transportation".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2002 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 107–296 effective on the date of transfer of the Coast Guard to the Department of Homeland Security, see section 1704(g) of Pub. L. 107–296, set out as a note under section 101 of this title.

#### Effective Date

Section effective Dec. 1, 1994, except as otherwise provided, see section 1691 of Pub. L. 103–337, set out as a note under section 10001 of this title.
### §16204. Regulations

This chapter shall be administered under regulations prescribed by the Secretary of Defense.

(Added Pub. L. 103–337, div. A, title XVI, §1663(c)(1), Oct. 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 3007.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

Provisions similar to those in this section were contained in section 2130(c) of this title, prior to amendment by Pub. L. 103–337, §1663(c)(4)(A).

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Dec. 1, 1994, except as otherwise provided, see section 1691 of Pub. L. 103–337, set out as a note under section 10001 of this title.
| (logo) NTS NATIONAL

TAX SEARCH, LLC | 303 E Wacker Drive, Suite 900

Chicago, IL 60601

(312) 233-6440 |
|--------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

 

 

REPORT ON ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE SECURITIES AND 

EXCHANGE COMMISSION'S REGULATION AB SERVICING CRITERIA

 

 

For the calendar year ending December 31, 2014, National Tax Search, LLC has been a Tax Service

Vendor for **Wells Fargo Bank**(the "Servicer").

 

National Tax Search, LLC ("NTS") is responsible for assessing compliance as of December 31, 2014 and for the period from January 1, 2014 through December 31, 2014 (the "Reporting Period") with the servicing criteria set forth in Title 17, Section 229.1122(d) of the Code of Federal Regulations (the "CFR"). NTS has used the servicing criteria communicated to NTS by the Servicer to assess compliance with the applicable servicing criteria. Only servicing criteria 1122 (d)(1)(ii), 1122 (d)l(iv), 1122 (d)2(ii), 1122 (d)2(v), 1122(d)2(vi), 1122 (d)2(vii), 1122(d)(4)(xi), and 1122(d)(4)(xii) (the "Applicable Servicing Criteria") are applicable to the activities NTS performs with respect to the transactions covered by this report. NTS has determined that the remaining servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122 (d) of the SEC Regulation AB are not applicable to the activities it performs with respect to the transactions covered by this report. The transactions covered by this report include all tax payments made on behalf of the Servicer using NTS's TaxQ system (the "Platform Transactions").

 

NTS, as a vendor, has assessed its compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria for the Reporting Period and has concluded that the NTS has complied, in all material respects, with the Applicable Servicing Criteria as of December 31, 2014 and for the Reporting Period with respect to the Platform Transactions taken as a whole.

 

Plante & Moran, PLLC, an independent registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report on the assessment of compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria as of December 31, 2014 and for the Reporting Period as set forth in this assertion.

 

National Tax Search, LLC, as Vendor to Servicer

 

/s/ Lori Eshoo

Lori D. Eshoo, President/CEO 

January 12, 2015
EXHIBIT 31.2 -- Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Andre Sakhai, President and Chief Executive Officer certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Australian-Canadian
Oil Royalties Ltd.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the period presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and I have:

      (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

      (b) (This paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Releases Nos. 33-8238 and
34-47986;)

      (c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

      (d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing equivalent function):

      (a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls that could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

      (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting


Date: November 17, 2006      /s/ ANDRE SAKHAI
                             ---------------------------------------------------
                             Andre Sakhai, President and Chief Executive Officer
#### THE SCHOONER RACHEL *v.*THE UNITED STATES.

No sentence of condemnation can be affirmed if the law under which the forfeiture accrued has expired, although a condemnation and sale had taken place, and the money had been paid over tto the United States before the expiration of the law. This court, in reversing the sentence, will not order the money to be repaid, but will award restitution fo the property , as if no sale had been made.

THIS. was an appeal from the sentence of the district- court of the United States for the district °f Orleans, which condemned the schooner Rachel for having traded with certain prohibited ports of St. Do- * . , ,- mingo, contrary to the act ot congress.

The sentence of condemnation was passed, and the vessel sold, and the proceeds paid over to the United States, while the act was in force. The act had.since expired. It was a case within the principle decided at last term, in the case of *Yeuton and Young*v. *The United States,*but it having been made,' a question whether the sale and payment over of th. money did not prevent the, operation of that principle, and there being also a question, of jurisdiction, the cause stood over to this term for consideration.

The general question of jurisdiction fif that court having been settled at this term in the case of *Serre and Laralde*v. *Pitot and*others, and the fáct of the sale and payment over of the money being admitted,

*330
      *Martin*and *P. B. Key,*

for the claimants, prayed tbe court to direct that the proceeds should be paid over to the claimants. •

But the *court*said that it was a matter to be left to the consideration of the court below. This court will only make a . general order for restitution of the property condemned.
|   |
|---|
|   |  |
| 1 | I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Ally Auto Receivables Trust 2012-1 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”); |

|   |
|---|
|   |  |
| 2 | Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; |

|   |
|---|
|   |  |
| 3 | Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports; |

|   |
|---|
|   |  |
| 4 | Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and |

|   |
|---|
|   |  |
| 5 | All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K. |

|                                                               |
|---------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                               |  |
| /s/ Ryan C. Farris                                            |   |
|                                                          |
| Ryan C. Farris                                                |
| President, Ally Auto Assets LLC, as Depositor                 |
| (Senior Officer in charge of securitization of the depositor) |