alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY

APPELLATE DIVISION

DOCKET NO . A

- 1865

- 18T3

THE BANK OF NEW YORK

MELLON f/k/a THE BANK

OF NEW YORK, AS TRUSTEE

FOR THE CERTIFICATE

HOLDERS CWALT, INC.,

ALTERNATIVE LOAN TRUST

2005

- 32T1 MORTGAGE PASS

THROUGH CERTIFICATES,

SERIES 2005

- 32T1,

Plaintiff

- Respondent,

v.

SCOTT R. NEWELL and

DOREEN NEWELL,

Defendants

- Appellants,

and

MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC

REGISTRATION SYSTEMS,

INC.

, AS NOMINEE FOR

COUNTRYWIDE BANK, NA, and

SALOMONE BROTHERS, INC.

,

Defendants.

_______________________________ NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE

APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION

This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court

. " A lthough it is posted on the

internet

, this opinion is binding only on the parties in the case and its use in other cases is limited

. R

. 1:36

- 3.2 A

- 1865

- 18T3 Argued November 1 3 , 2019

– Decided April 6, 2020

Before Judges Fisher, Accurso, and Gilson.

On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey,

Chancery Division, Morris County

, Docket No. F

025202

- 15.

Owen T. Weaver argued the cause for appel l ants

(Inglesino, Webster, Wyciskala & Taylor, LLC, and

Pezold , Smith, Hirschmann and Selvaggio, LLC,

attorneys; Denis F. Driscoll, Owen T. Taylor, Joao

Magalhaes

, and Gerard F. Smith, of counsel and on the

briefs).

Robert F. Thomas argued the cause for respondent

(Pluese, Becker & Saltzman, LLC, attorney s; Stuart H.

West

, on the brief).

PER CURIAM

Th e parties have advised the court this matter has been amicably re solved

and have stipulated to the dismissal of this appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is

dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
#### Annie E. Youngs Hawkins, Respondent, v. James C. C. Van Nuyse, Appellant.

Judgment and order unanimously affirmed, with costs. Ho opinion. Present — Woodward, Jenks, Hooker, Gaynor and Miller, JJ.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of a meeting of the Board of Scientific Counselors, NIAMS.

The meeting will be closed to the public as indicated below in accordance with the provisions set forth in section 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended for the review, discussion, and evaluation of individual intramural programs and projects conducted by the National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases, including consideration of personnel qualifications and performance, and the competence of individual investigators, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         Board of Scientific Counselors, NIAMS.                    

*Date:*                         March 3-4, 2011.                    

*Time:*                         8 a.m. to 5 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate the Molecular Immunology and Inflammation Branch and the Laboratory of Skin Biology.                     

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, Building 31, 31 Center Drive, Conference Room 4C32, Bethesda, MD 20892.                     

*Contact Person:*                         John J. O'Shea, MD, PhD, Scientific Director, National Institute of Arthritis & Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases, Building 10, Room 9N228, MSC 1820, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 496-2612,                         *osheaj@arb.niams.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.846, Arthritis, Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

                        Dated:                         *February 9, 2011.*

Jennifer S. Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2011-3481 Filed 2-15-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
Attachment	B

UAS	Platforms

DJI	Inspire	1

DJI	Matrice	100

Manuals	are	hereby	incorporated	by	reference. All	are	attached	as	PDF	Documents	to	the	petition.
§ 166.602 What form of bonds will the BIA accept? ( a ) We will only accept bonds in the following forms: ( 1 ) Cash;
( 2 ) Negotiable Treasury securities that: ( i ) Have a market value equal to the bond amount; and
( ii ) Are accompanied by a statement granting full authority to the BIA to sell such securities in case of a violation of the terms of the permit.
( 3 ) Certificates of deposit that indicate on their face that Secretarial approval is required prior to redemption by any party;
( 4 ) Irrevocable letters of credit (LOC) issued by federally-insured financial institutions authorized to do business in the United States. LOC's must: ( i ) Contain a clause that grants the BIA authority to demand immediate payment if the permittee defaults or fails to replace the LOC within 30 calendar days prior to its expiration date;
( ii ) Be payable to the “Department of the Interior, BIA”;
( iii ) Be irrevocable during its term and have an initial expiration date of not less than one year following the date we receive it; and
( iv ) Be automatically renewable for a period of not less than one year, unless the issuing financial institution provides the BIA with written notice at least 90 calendar days before the letter of credit's expiration date that it will not be renewed;
( 5 ) Surety bond; or
( 6 ) Any other form of highly liquid, non-volatile security subsequently approved by us that is easily convertible to cash by us and for which our approval is required prior to redemption by any party.
( b ) Indian landowners may negotiate a permit term that specifies the use of any of the bond forms described in paragraph (a) of this section.
( c ) A tribe may accept and hold any form of bond described in paragraph (a) of this section, to secure performance under a permit of tribal land.
#### § 225.28 Approval of amendments to minerals agreements.

An amendment, modification or supplement to a minerals agreement entered into pursuant to the regulations in this part, whether the minerals agreement was approved before or after the effective date of these regulations, must be approved in writing by all parties before being submitted to the Secretary for approval. The provisions of § 225.22 apply to approvals of amendments, modifications, or supplements to minerals agreements entered into under the regulations in this part. However, amendments, modifications, or supplements that do not substantially alter or affect the factors listed in § 225.22(c), may be approved by referencing materials previously submitted for the initial review and approval of the minerals agreement. The Secretary may approve an amendment, modification, or supplement if it is determined that the underlying minerals agreement, as amended, modified, or supplemented meets the criteria for approval set forth in § 225.22(c).
### §8220. Dental services: responsibilities of senior dental officer

(a) The Secretary of the Navy shall prescribe regulations for dental services on ships and at shore stations. Such services shall be under the senior dental officer, who is responsible to the commanding officer of the ship or station for all professional, technical, and administrative matters concerning dental services.

(b) This section does not impose any administrative requirements that would interfere with the proper functioning of battle organizations.

(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 377, §6029; renumbered §8220, Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, §807(b)(7), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1834.)

| Revised section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 6029 | 5 U.S.C. 456d. | Dec. 28, 1945, ch. 604, §4, 59 Stat. 667. |

The words "for establishing" are omitted as executed and unnecessary.

The last sentence of §4 of the Act of December 28, 1945, ch. 604, 59 Stat. 667, was a repealing clause and savings provision. It is omitted from this section.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–232 renumbered section 6029 of this title as this section.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2018 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 115–232 effective Feb. 1, 2019, with provision for the coordination of amendments and special rule for certain redesignations, see section 800 of Pub. L. 115–232, set out as a note preceding section 3001 of this title.
### §8031. Office of the Chief of Naval Operations: function; composition

(a) There is in the executive part of the Department of the Navy an Office of the Chief of Naval Operations. The function of the Office of the Chief of Naval Operations is to assist the Secretary of the Navy in carrying out his responsibilities.

(b) The Office of the Chief of Naval Operations is composed of the following:

(1) The Chief of Naval Operations.

(2) The Vice Chief of Naval Operations.

(3) The Deputy Chiefs of Naval Operations.

(4) The Assistant Chiefs of Naval Operations.

(5) The Surgeon General of the Navy.

(6) The Chief of Naval Personnel.

(7) The Chief of Chaplains of the Navy.

(8) Other members of the Navy and Marine Corps assigned or detailed to the Office of the Chief of Naval Operations.

(9) Civilian employees in the Department of the Navy assigned or detailed to the Office of the Chief of Naval Operations.

(c) Except as otherwise specifically prescribed by law, the Office of the Chief of Naval Operations shall be organized in such manner, and its members shall perform such duties and have such titles, as the Secretary may prescribe.

(Added Pub. L. 99–433, title V, §512(b), Oct. 1, 1986, 100 Stat. 1048, §5031; renumbered §8031, Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, §807(a)(1), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1834.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 8031 was renumbered section 9031 of this title.

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–232 renumbered section 5031 of this title as this section.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2018 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 115–232 effective Feb. 1, 2019, with provision for the coordination of amendments and special rule for certain redesignations, see section 800 of Pub. L. 115–232, set out as a note preceding section 3001 of this title.
#### STATE OF CONNECTICUT *v.*SHAWN SELLS

Decided July 13, 2004

*Louis S. Avitabile,*special public defender, in support of the petition.

*John A. East III,*senior assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 82 Conn. App. 332 (AC 23193), is denied.
EXHIBIT 32. - Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

                    CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Australian-Canadian Oil
Royalties Ltd. (the "Company") for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2008, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), Andre Sakhai, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
and Bernard Lipton, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of their knowledge, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.

Dated: August 13, 2008       /s/ Andre Sakhai
                             Andre Sakhai, President and Chief Executive Officer

Dated: August 13, 2008       /s/ Bernard Lipton
                             ---------------------------------------------------
                             Bernard Lipton, Chief Financial Officer

This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
#### § 213.13 Inherited lands.

Except to prevent loss or waste, leases on undivided inherited lands will not be approved until the heirship determination has been approved. If the heirs to undivided inherited lands are undetermined or cannot be located, or if the heirs owning less than one-half interest in the lands refuse to sign a lease and it appears necessary to lease the lands to prevent loss or waste, the Area Director will report the facts to the Commissioner of Indian Affairs and ask for instructions. Minor heirs can lease or joint adult heirs in leasing only through guardians under order of court. Proof of heirship shall be given upon Form F prescribed. If probate or other court proceedings have established the heirship in any case, or the land has been partitioned, certified copy of final order, judgment, or decree of the court will be accepted in lieu of Form F.
### Physical environment of the National Reactor Testing Station, Idaho; a summary

By: Raymond L. NaceMorris DeutschPaul T. Voegeli

Edited by: Seymour Subitzky

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/pp725A

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plate:  **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
MIDLAND CAPITAL HOLDINGS CORPORATION

                                   EXHIBIT 11

              STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE

                                      Three Months Ended      Nine months Ended
                                           March 31,              March 31,
                                        2004       2003        2004       2003
                                     ---------   --------   ---------   --------

Net Income                           $ 192,904   $177,553   $ 857,502   $559,561
                                     =========   ========   =========   ========

Weighted average common shares
  outstanding for basic computation    372,600    370,338     372,600    366,065
                                     =========   ========   =========   ========

Basic earnings per share             $    0.52   $   0.48   $    2.30   $   1.53
                                     =========   ========   =========   ========

Weighted average common shares
  outstanding for basic computation    372,600    370,338     372,600    366,065

Common stock equivalents due to
  dilutive effect of stock options          --        714          --        641
                                     ---------   --------   ---------   --------

Weighted average common shares and
  equivalents outstanding for
  diluted computation                  372,600    371,052     372,600    366,706
                                     =========   ========   =========   ========

Diluted earnings per share           $    0.52   $   0.48   $    2.30   $   1.53
                                     =========   ========   =========   ========
## IN THE COURT O F CRIMINA L A PPEA LS OF TEXA S NO. WR-82,086-01

EX P ARTE ST EVEN D. HAWKIN S, App licant

ON AP P LICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORP US CAUSE NO. 03-3319-A IN THE 106 DISTRICT COURT T H F ROM G AINES COUNTY Per curiam . O R D E R P u rs u an t t o the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedur e, the cler k of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habea s corpus. Ex parte Y oung , 418 S.W .2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of o n e co u n t of ag g rava ted sexual assault and six counts of indece ncy with a child. He was sentenc ed to seventy -five y ear s’ imprisonment for the ag g ravated sexual assault, twenty y ear s’ imprisonment for three counts of indece ncy with a child, and ten y ear s’ imprisonment on the other three counts of indece ncy with a child. Applicant contends that his counsel render ed ineffec tive assistance beca use counsel failed to timely file a notice of appe al.2

Applicant has alleg ed fac ts that, if true, might entitle him to relief

. Strickland v. W

ashington , 466 U.S. 668 (1984); Ex parte Patterson , 993 S.W .2d 114, 115 (Tex. Crim. App. 1999); Ex parte Axe l , 757 S.W .2d 369 (Tex. Crim. App. 1988). I n these circ umstances, additional fac ts are neede d. As we he ld in Ex parte Rodriguez , 334 S.W .2d 294, 294 (Tex. Crim. App. 1960), the trial court is the appropr iat e fo ru m for finding s of fac t. The trial court shall order counsel to respond to Applicant’s claim of ineffe ctive assistance of counsel. The trial court may use any means set out in T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O C . art. 11.07, § 3(d)

. I f the trial court elec ts to hold a hear ing, it shall dete rmine whe ther Applica nt is indi g ent. I f Applicant is indige nt and wishes to be repr esente d by counsel, the t ri al court shall appoint an attorney to repre sent Applicant at the hear ing. T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O C . art. 26.04. The t ri al court shall make findings of fac t and conclusions of l aw as to whether Applicant

was denied him rig ht to a meaningfu l ap p ea l b eca use Applicant’s counsel failed to timely file a notice of a

ppeal. The trial court shall also make a ny other finding s of fa ct and c onclusions of law that it deems rele vant and appropr iate to the dispositi on of Applicant ’s cl aim for habea s corpus relief

. This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fac t issues. The issues sh al l b e re s o l ved within 90 day s of this order

. A supplemental transcr ipt containing all aff idavits and int err og atories or the t ransc ription of t he court repor ter’s notes from any hear ing or deposition, along with the trial court’ s supplemental finding s of fa ct and c onclusions of law, shall be forwar ded to this Court withi n 120 day s of the date of t his order

. Any extensions of t ime shall be obtained f

rom this Court.

Filed: Nove mber 19, 2014 Do not publish
#### Bankers’ Money Order Association v. Friedrich Nachod and Others.

Motion granted. Order resettled.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 

G. ROBERT MAHRT and WESTERN MONTANA 

REGIONAL MENTAL HEALTH CENTER, 

Petitioner and Respondent. 

vs. 

CITY OF KALISPELL, 

Respondent a.nd Appellant. 

- 

ORDER AND OPINION 

The City of Kalispell appeals an order of the Flathead 

County District Court granting the Western Montana Regional 

Mental Health Center a conditional use permit to locate a 

group home for eight or fewer mentally disabled adults in an 

Kalispell area zoned residental. 

The Health Center applied to the Kalispell Board of 

Adjustment for a conditional use permit to convert a 

residence to a group home in a Residential-5 area, as defined 

by the Kalispell City Code. In applying, the Health Center 

satisfied the requirements of the Kalispell City Code. The 

Health Center relied on sections 76-2-411 a-nd 412 (1983), MCA 

which defines a group home as a community residential 

facility and mandates group homes to be considered 

residential use of property for zoning purposes. Despite the 

law, the Kalispell Board of Adjustment denied the conditional 

use permit. The Health Center challenged the decision of the 

Board in District Court where the Board's obvious error wa-s 

corrected. Now the City of Kalispell asks this Court to 

review the District Court's decision. Based on our decision 
in State ex rel. Thelen v. Missoula (1975), 545 P.2d 173, 168 

Mont. 375, and the 1egi.slative mandate in Tit3.e 76, Ch. 2, 

Part 4 we decline to review the decision of the District 

Court. 

There is absolutely no question that in Montana a. group 

home for eight or fewer people is a residence and may be 

located in anv area in Montana zoned residential. Article 

XXI, 3 (3) of the Monta.na Constitution, Title 76, Ch. 2, 

Part 4 of Montana statutory law and case law as stated in 

Thelen v. Missoul.a, 168 Mont. 375, 543 P.2d 173, make it 

clear this is the rule in Montana. This Court will not 

require community residential facilities to repeatedly defend 

their well established right to locate in any residential 

area in Montana. The Kalispell appeal is meritless and 

dismissed as frivolous. Costs in the sum of $500 are 

assessed against the City and in favor of the petitioners 

under Rule 32, M.R.App.Civ.P., with costs of this appeal, and 

the usual costs in District Court. 

%~p&4 

Chief "Justice 
Justice Daniel. J. Shea special concurrence: 

I do not view the dismissal here as a summary dismissal. 

Rather, it is a short opinion d.isposing of the merits an6 

decl-axing that a longer opinion will not be written. With 

that I agree. The appeal is totally
Order entered January 24, 2019

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-18-00592-CV

ARKING JONES, Appellant

V.

KIRKSTALL ROAD ENTERPRISES, INC., Appellee

On Appeal from the 191st Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-16-01794

ORDER

Before the Court is appellant’s motion to strike the letter brief filed by appellee on 

January 4, 2019. We DENY the motion. No further briefing will be allowed unless requested by 

the submissions panel.

/s/ ERIN A. NOWELL 

JUSTICE