alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**§ 99.35(a)(3 )** 

The final regulation add a new requirement under § 99.35(a)(3) that requires an agency headed by an official listed in § 99.31(a)(3) to use a written agreement to designate any authorized representative other than an agency employ ee. The w ritten agreement must: (1) designate the individual or entity

as an authorized representative; (2) specify the PII from education records to be disclosed; (3) specify

that the purpose for which the PII from education records is disclosed to the authorized representative is to carry out an audit or evaluation of Federal

- or State

- supported education programs, or to enforce or to compl y with Federal legal requirements that relate to those programs; (4) describe the activity to make clear that it legitimately fits within the exception of §99.31; (5) require the authorized representative to destro y P II from education records when the information is no longer needed for the purpose specified; (6) specify the time period in which the PII from education records mu st be destro yed; and (7) establish policies and procedures, consistent with FERPA and other Federal and State confidentiality and privacy provisions, to protect PII from education records from further disclosure (except back to the disclosing entity ) and u nauthorized use. We estimate that the burden for States is estimated at 40 hours annuall y for each educational authorit y (one for K

- 12 and one for postsecondary ). This 40 hours of burden was reached by estimating that 103 State authorities may handle the agreements up to 10 times per y ear with an estimated time of 4 hours per agreement. Total anticipated increase in annual burden would be 4,120 hours for this new requirement.

In addition, the burden for large LEAs and postsecondary institutions (1,452 ed

ucational agencies and institutions with a student population of over 10,000) is estimated to be 4 hours annually . Assuming each large LEA and postsecondary institution handles the agreements up to 1 time per y ear with an estimated 4 hours per agreement, the total anticipated increase in annual burden for large LEAs and postsecondary institutions would be 5,808 hours for this requirement. The total estimated burden under this provision is 9,928 hours.

No. of St. & Fed. Edu. Authorities: 103 Average No. of Disclosures: x 10 # of Responses 1,030

Hours/Response: x 4__

Burden Hours 4,120

No. of Large LEAs & Post. I nst : 1,452 Average No. of Disclosures: x 1 # of Responses 1,452

Hours/Response: x 4_

Burden Hours 5,8082

State & Fed. Burden Hours: 4,120 School Burden Hours: 5,808 Total Burden Hours for Written Agreements: 9,928
Exhibit
        32.2
  CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
        2002
  In
        connection with Amendment No. 2 to the Quarterly Report of Hometown Auto
        Retailers, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q/A for the period ending March
        31,
        2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
        (the "Report"), I, Charles F. Schwartz, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
        certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
        Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
  (1)
        The
        Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
        the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  (2)
        The
        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
   /s/
        Charles F. Schwartz
 Charles
        F. Schwartz
 Chief
        Financial OfficerApril 14, 2006
**Exhibit 32.1**

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of OMI Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Craig H. Stevenson, Jr., Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

|   | 1)  | The Report fully complies with the requirements    of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                            |
|--------|----------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | 2)       |  The information contained in the Report fairly presents,        in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations    of the Company. |

 

          

| **Date:** | August 14, 2003 |   | **By:** | /s/ Craig H. Stevenson, Jr**.**                          |
|-----------|-----------------|--------|---------|----------------------------------------------------------|
|      |                 |   |    |                                                          |
|      |            |   |    | **Craig H. Stevenson, Jr.**                              |
|      |            |   |    | **Chairman of the Board and****Chief Executive Officer** |

 

 

*A signed original of this statement required by Section 906 has been provided to OMI Corporation and will be retained by OMI Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its Staff upon request.*
### SERVED: February 19, 2015 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, DC

IN THE MATTER OF American Medtlight, Inc. DOCKETNO. FAA 2014-0815 (Civil Penalty Action)

ORDEROF DISMISSAL The Federal Aviation Administration (hereinafter ''FAA") tiled a Motion to Dismiss dated February 10, 2015 alleging it had settled this matter with Air Medical Resource Group, Inc. (hereinafter "Respondent"). 14 C.F.R. 

### § 13.215 states: "At any time before or during a hearing, an agency attorney may withdrawa complaintorparty may withdraw a request for a hearing without the consentofthe administrative lawjudge. Ifan agency attorney withdraws the complaint or a party withdraws the request for a hearing and the answer, the administrative lawjudge shall dismiss the proceedings under this subpart with prejudice." WHEREFORE, the within filed Motion to Dismisshaving been read and considered, it is ORDERED as follows: 1. The FAA's Motion to Dismiss be and is hereby granted; and 2. This proceeding be and is hereby dismissedwith prejudice.

Richard C. Goodwin U.S. Administrative Law Judge
Attachment- Service ListSERVICE LIST- BY U.S. MAlL ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

### Federal AviationAdministration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite2WI000 1 ONE COPY 

### Michael 

### L. Dworkin, Respondent 's Counsel 465 California Street, Suite 210 San Francisco, CA 941 04-1808 TEL: 415-421-2500 FAX: 415A21-2560 lryll Robbins-Umel, Complainant's Counsel Office ofthe Regional Counsel, AWP-7 Federal Aviation Administration Western-Pacific Region P.O. Box 92007 Los Angeles, CA 90009-2007 TEL: 310-725-7112 FAX: 310-725-6816 The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin,Administrative LawJudge Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 NewJersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-5121 StaffAssistant FAX: 202-366-7536 Docket No. FAA-2014-0815 (Civil Penalty Action)

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person orby expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2WI000, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 

### 2
EXHIBIT 32.2 – 906 Certification





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C., SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Genmed Holding Corp. (the "Company") for the three months ended June 30, 2012, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer) of the Company, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered by the Report.







Date: August 14, 2012
/s/ Randy HibmaRandy Hibma

Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial Officer)


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 ("Section 906"), or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Genmed Holding Corp., and will be retained by Genmed Holding Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
### Geology and copper mineralization of the Saindak Quadrangle, Chagai District, West Pakistan

By: Waheeduddin AhmedShahid Noor KhanRobert Gordon Schmidt

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/pp716A

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plate:  **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
* This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the

doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and col lateral estoppel. This court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judg ments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and condi tions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.

** After examining the briefs and the appellate recor d, this three-judge panel has determined unanimously that oral argumentwould not be of material assistance in the determination of this appeal. Se e Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The cause is therefore ordered sub mitted without oral argument. 

## F I L E D United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit 

### NOV 4 1998 

### PATRICK FISHER Clerk UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT

PHILLIP EUGENE GARDNER, Petitioner - Appellant, vs. RON CHAMPION, Respondent - Appellee. No. 98-5065 (D.C. No. 97-CV-148-K) (N.D. Okla.)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

Before PORFILIO , KELLY , and HENRY , Circuit Judges. **
Petitioner-Appellant Phillip Eugene Gardner, an inm ate appearing pro se, appeals from the denial of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Mr. Gardner’s habeas petition alleges: (1) disproportionate sentencing and (2) he was denied a direct appeal of his convictions through ineffective assistance of counsel. Upon recommendation of the magistrate judge,- 2 -

the district court dismissed the petition without p rejudice for failure to exhaust state remedies. The district court also denied a c ertificate of appealability. In reaching its ruling, the district court permitte d supplemental briefing on the issue of futility of available state remedies. The court found that an available state remedy exists because the state court could h ear Mr. Gardner’s claims if he articulates “sufficient reason” for inadequately having raised his claim previously. Before Mr. Gardner may proceed on appeal, he must s ecure a certificate of appealability from this court. See 28 U.S.C. §2253(c)(1)(A). Raising the same issues he raised in the district court, petitioner argues that this court should grant a certificate of appealability because the districtcourt erred by: (1) not liberally construing his pro se pleadings, (2) finding that f urther state court litigation would not be futile, and (3) disposing of his habea s claims on non-exhaustion grounds without holding an evidentiary hearing. Upon consideration of the record and petitioner’s b rief, we conclude that petitioner has failed to make “a substantial showin g of the denial of a constitutional right. See 28 U.S.C. §2253(c)(2). We DENY petitioner’s reque st for a certificate of appealability. The appeal is DISMISSED. Entered for the Court Paul J. Kelly, Jr. Circuit Judge
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998             DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998             JUN-27-1999
<CASH>                                           7,476                   8,116
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   89,053                 111,194
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,435                   1,495
<INVENTORY>                                     41,247                  40,970
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               150,928                 172,421
<PP&E>                                         751,588                 799,299
<DEPRECIATION>                                 364,896                 379,791
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 596,747                 649,778
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          160,845                 166,723
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                             0                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                   (438,794)               (458,086)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   596,747                 649,778
<SALES>                                        588,131                 331,876
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               588,131                 331,876
<CGS>                                          470,762                 267,006
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  470,762                 267,006
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                73,285                  24,180
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              68,379                  41,111
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (24,295)                   (421)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,092                     536
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (25,387)                   (957)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    675                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (26,062)                   (957)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0                       0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0                       0


</TABLE>
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDG MENT

No. 04

- 15

- 00434

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF S.L. , a Child

From the 25th Judicial District Court, Guadalupe County, Texas

Trial Court No. 04

- 0152

- CV

Honorable Gary L. Steel, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE ALVAREZ

, JUSTICE CHAPA , AND JUSTICE PULLIAM

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED FOR

WANT OF PROSECUTION. Costs of this appeal are taxed against Appellant Sally Leeson.

SIGNED September 9, 2015.

_________________________________ Patricia O. Alvarez , Justice
### **CHAPTER 1006—RESERVE COMPONENT COMMANDS**

Sec.
10171.
United States Army Reserve Command.
10172.
Navy Reserve Force.
10173.
Marine Forces Reserve.
10174.
Air Force Reserve Command.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**2006**—Pub. L. 109–163, div. A, title V, §515(b)(4)(F), Jan. 6, 2006, 119 Stat. 3235, substituted "Navy Reserve" for "Naval Reserve" in item 10172.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 

Home : Media : Photos

slide show module

Lt. Rachel Lee Performs Preflight Checks

84th Engineer Battalion builds warehouse in Itbayat

Tiger Strike 24: Amphibious Assault

MRF-D 24.3 U.S. Marines, Sailors embark HMAS Adelaide for Wet and Dry Exercise Rehearsal

USS Louisiana Depart Naval Base Guam

USS Ralph Johnson Conducts Replenishment at Sea with USS Ronald Reagan

Tiger Strike 24: Fast-Rope and PZ Operations

BTF flies farther with 909th ARS support

Tiger Strike 24: Amphibious Operations in the South China Sea

JPMRC-X - Air Assault to Jungle Base
Searched for **https://www.dni.gov/index.php/ncsc-home**

 

19961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024

*Note:* This calendar view maps the number of captures of **https://www.dni.gov/index.php/ncsc-home**, *not* how many times the site was actually updated.

Look Up URL in general Internet Archive web collection.
#### The Banner Rubber Company, Appellant, v. Morris J. Davenport, Respondent.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. All concurred, except Smith, P. J., and-Kellogg, J., dissenting.
### §7251. Presentation of United States flag upon retirement

(a) Presentation of Flag.—Upon the release of a member of the Army from active duty for retirement, the Secretary of the Army shall present a United States flag to the member.

(b) Multiple Presentations Not Authorized.—A member is not eligible for a presentation of a flag under subsection (a) if the member has previously been presented a flag under this section or any other provision of law providing for the presentation of a United States flag incident to release from active service for retirement.

(c) No Cost to Recipient.—The presentation of a flag under this section shall be at no cost to the recipient.

(Added Pub. L. 105–261, div. A, title VI, §644(a)(1), Oct. 17, 1998, 112 Stat. 2048, §3681; amended Pub. L. 106–65, div. A, title VI, §652(e), Oct. 5, 1999, 113 Stat. 666; renumbered §7251, Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, §808(b)(9), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1838.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–232 renumbered section 3681 of this title as this section.

1999—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 106–65 substituted "under this section or any other provision of law providing for the presentation of a United States flag incident to release from active service for retirement." for "under this section or section 6141 or 8681 of this title or section 516 of title 14."

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2018 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 115–232 effective Feb. 1, 2019, with provision for the coordination of amendments and special rule for certain redesignations, see section 800 of Pub. L. 115–232, set out as a note preceding section 3001 of this title.

#### Effective Date

Pub. L. 105–261, div. A, title VI, §644(e), Oct. 17, 1998, 112 Stat. 2049, provided that: "Sections 3681, 6141, and 8681 [now 7251, 8261, and 9251] of title 10, United States Code (as added by this section), and section 516 [now 2748] of title 14, United States Code (as added by subsection (d)), shall apply with respect to releases from active duty described in those sections on or after October 1, 1998."
### §10210. Dissemination of information

The Secretary of Defense shall require the complete and current dissemination, to all Reserves and to the public, of information of interest to the reserve components.

(Added Pub. L. 103–337, div. A, title XVI, §1661(a)(1), Oct. 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 2978.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

Provisions similar to those in this section were contained in section 278 of this title, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 103–337, §1661(a)(2)(A).

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Dec. 1, 1994, except as otherwise provided, see section 1691 of Pub. L. 103–337, set out as a note under section 10001 of this title.