alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
| (logo) NTS NATIONAL

TAX SEARCH, LLC | 130 S. Jefferson, Suite 300

Chicago, IL 60661

312-233-6440 |
|--------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

REPORT ON ASSESSMENT OFCOMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION’SREGULATION AB SERVICING CRITERIA

 

 

For the calendar year endingDecember 31, 2016, National Tax Search, LLC has been a Tax Service Vendor for **WellsFargo Bank** (the “Servicer”).

 

National Tax Search, LLC(“NTS”) is responsible for assessing compliance as of December 31,2016 and for the period from January 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016 (the“Reporting Period”) with the servicing criteria set forth in Title17, Section 229.1122(d) of the Code of Federal Regulations (the“CFR”). NTS has used the servicing criteria communicated to NTS bythe Servicer to assess compliance with the applicable servicing criteria. Onlyservicing criteria 1122 (d) (l)(ii), 1122 (d)1(iv), 1122 (d)2(ii), 1122(d)2(v), 1122(d)2(vi), 1122(d)(4)(xi), and 1122(d)(4)(xii) (the“Applicable Servicing Criteria”) are applicable to the activities NTSperforms with respect to the transactions covered by this report. NTS hasdetermined that the remaining servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122 (d) ofthe SEC Regulation AB are not applicable to the activities it performs withrespect to the transactions covered by this report. The transactions covered bythis report include all tax payments made on behalf of the Servicer usingNTS’s TaxQ system (the “Platform Transactions”).

 

NTS, as a vendor, has assessedits compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria for the Reporting Periodand has concluded that NTS has complied, in all material respects, with theApplicable Servicing Criteria as of December 31, 2016 and for the ReportingPeriod with respect to the Platform Transactions taken as a whole.

 

Plante& Moran, PLLC, anindependent registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation reporton the assessment of compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria as ofDecember 31, 2016 and for the Reporting Period as set forth in this assertion.

 

National Tax Search, LLC, asVendor to Servicer

 

 

/s/ Lori D. Eshoo

Lori D. Eshoo, President/CEO 

January 23, 2017
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC
ACCOUNTING FIRM



We consent to the incorporation by reference
in Registration Statement (Nos. 333-185247, 333-187826 and 333-191880 on Post-Effective Amendments to Form F-1 on Form F-3) of
Celsus Therapeutics PLC and the related prospectuses of our report dated March 24, 2014, with respect to the consolidated financial
statements of Celsus Therapeutics PLC included in this Annual Report (Form 20-F) of Celsus Therapeutics PLC for the year ended
December 31, 2013.





|                 | /s/ KOST FORER GABBAY & KASIERER
|---------------- | --------------------------------
|Tel-Aviv, Israel | KOST FORER GABBAY & KASIERER    
|March 24, 2014   | A Member of Ernst & Young Global
§ 20.328 How can a tribe apply for Disaster Assistance? ( a ) The tribe affected by the disaster is considered the applicant and must submit the following to the Regional Director through the local Superintendent: ( 1 ) A tribal resolution requesting disaster assistance;
( 2 ) A copy of county, state, or Presidential declaration of disaster; and
( 3 ) The projected extent of need in the service area not covered by other federal funding sources.
( b ) The Regional Director must forward the above tribal documents and his/her recommendation to the Assistant Secretary for final decision on whether disaster assistance will be provided and to what extent.
#### § 175.600 How does the Paperwork Reduction Act affect this part?

The collection of information contained in this part have been approved by the Office of Management and Budget under 44 U.S.C. 3501 *et seq.* and assigned OMB Control Number 1076-0021. Response is required to obtain a benefit. A Federal agency may not conduct or sponsor, and you are not required to respond to, a collection of information unless the form or regulation requesting the information displays a currently valid OMB Control Number. Send comments regarding this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing the burden, to the Information Collection Clearance Officer—Indian Affairs, 1849 C Street NW, Washington, DC 20240.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Dec-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 Jan-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   Sep-30-2000
<CASH>                                         875,373
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   26,894
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     31,192
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,038,100
<PP&E>                                         347,239
<DEPRECIATION>                                  22,484
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,693,965
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          121,438
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         5,193
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,693,965
<SALES>                                        288,623
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               288,623
<CGS>                                          113,641
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,089,051
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (1,936,070)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (1,936,070)
<DISCONTINUED>                                (336,159)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (2,272,229)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
[No. 5092.]

[No. 2664 C. A.]

#### The Union Steel and Chain Company v. Wagoner.

Practice in Civil Actions — Contracts—Pleadings—Evidence.

Where a case was tried on an express contract by defendant to pay plaintiff an agreed price for machinery, and both parties ignored a cause of action on a quantum meruit contained in the complaint, the court committed no error in excluding evidence of the defendant as to the value of the machinery, although similar evidence had been admitted on behalf of plaintiff without objection. — P. 376.

*Error to the District Court of Arapahoe County.*

*Hon. Peter L. Palmer, Judge.*

Action by John Wagoner against The Union Steel and Chain Company. Prom a • judgment in favor of plaintiff, defendant brings error.

*Affirmed.*

*376Mr. C. H. Pierce and Mr. Henry T. Sale, for plaintiff in error.

Mr. George P. Steele, for défendant in error.

Mr. Justice -Gunter

delivered the opinion of the court:

This case was tried upon an express contract by defendant to pay to* plaintiff an agreed price1 for certain machinery, both parties ignoring a cause of action upon a *quantum meruit*also contained in the complaint. The case was tried to- the court, resulting in a finding and judgment for plaintiff, defendant in error here.

As the cause of action concededly proceeded upon was an express contract to pay a stipulated price, the court committed no- error in excluding any evidence offered by defendant going to the value of the machinery involved. The mere fact that the court admitted evidence upon this immaterial issue, to wit, the value of the machinery, in behalf of plaintiff, was no reason why it should repeat the error by receiving like testimony from the defendant. The' ruling simply excluded immaterial testimony, and was not error. The contract between plaintiff and defendant was effected through an agent.' Plaintiff in testifying stated the transaction as reported to him by his agent. It is said this was error. It suffices to say that this testimony was admitted without objection.

Plaintiff testified to a conversation with the representative of defendant, wherein such representative admitted the contract sued on, and, it is said, the court refused to permit defendant to give- evidence as to this conversation. The facts fail to sustain this contention. There was no effort to show by other witnesses such conversation, and there was *377no ruling of the court excluding the evidence of other witnesses going to this conversation.

It is further contended that the evidence does not support the finding and judgment of the court. There was evidence for plaintiff which, if credited, made out the cause of action sued on. This being true, there was evidence sufficient to sustain the finding and judgment of the court.

The judgment below is affirmed.

*Affirmed.*

Chief Justice Gabbekt and Mr. well concurring. _ Justice Max-
# C_2017443EN.01090701.xml

| 22.12.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 443/907 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.12.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 443/907

---

P7_TA(2014)0402

EU-Korea Framework Agreement with the exception of matters related to readmission ***

European Parliament legislative resolution of 16 April 2014 on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of the Framework Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, on the one part, and the Republic of Korea, on the other part, with the exception of matters related to readmission (05287/2014 — C7-0044/2014 — 2013/0267B(NLE))

(Consent)

(2017/C 443/78)

The European Parliament,

The European Parliament

| — | having regard to the draft Council decision (05287/2014), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the draft Council decision (05287/2014),

| — | having regard to the Framework Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Korea, of the other part (06151/2010), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the Framework Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Korea, of the other part (06151/2010),

| — | having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Articles 91, 100, 191(4), 207, 212 and Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (a) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C7-0044/2014), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Articles 91, 100, 191(4), 207, 212 and Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (a) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C7-0044/2014),

| — | having regard to Rule 81(1), first and third subparagraphs, Rule 81(2), and Rule 90(7) of its Rules of Procedure, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Rule 81(1), first and third subparagraphs, Rule 81(2), and Rule 90(7) of its Rules of Procedure,

| — | having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on Foreign Affairs and the opinion of the Committee on International Trade (A7-0265/2014), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on Foreign Affairs and the opinion of the Committee on International Trade (A7-0265/2014),

| 1. | Gives its consent to conclusion of the agreement; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Gives its consent to conclusion of the agreement;

| 2. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States and of the Republic of Korea. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States and of the Republic of Korea.

---
H. Res. 330

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

October 14, 1999.

Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it

shall be in order without intervention of any point of order

to consider in the House the bill (H.R. 3064) making appropriations for the government of the District of Columbia and

other activities chargeable in whole or in part against revenues of said District for the fiscal year ending September 30,

2000, and for other purposes. The bill shall be considered as

read for amendment. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill to final passage without intervening motion except: (1) one hour of debate equally divided

and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member

of the Committee on Appropriations; and (2) one motion to

recommit.

Attest:

Clerk.
#### § 166.102 Do tribal laws apply to permits?

Tribal laws will apply to permits of Indian land under the jurisdiction of the tribe enacting such laws, unless those tribal laws are inconsistent with applicable federal law.
### §7131. Definition

In this chapter, the term "enlistment" means original enlistment or reenlistment.

(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 177, §3251; Pub. L. 100–180, div. A, title XII, §1231(19)(A), Dec. 4, 1987, 101 Stat. 1161; renumbered §7131, Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, §808(b)(2), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1838.)

| Revised section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 3251 | [No source]. | [No source]. |

The revised section is inserted for clarity.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–232 renumbered section 3251 of this title as this section.

1987—Pub. L. 100–180 inserted ", the term" after "In this chapter".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2018 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 115–232 effective Feb. 1, 2019, with provision for the coordination of amendments and special rule for certain redesignations, see section 800 of Pub. L. 115–232, set out as a note preceding section 3001 of this title.
### §10205. Members of Ready Reserve: requirement of notification of change of status

(a) Each member of the Ready Reserve shall notify the Secretary concerned of any change in the member's address, marital status, number of dependents, or civilian employment and of any change in the member's physical condition that would prevent the member from meeting the physical or mental standards prescribed for the member's armed force.

(b) This section shall be administered under regulations prescribed by the Secretary of Defense and by the Secretary of Homeland Security with respect to the Coast Guard when it is not operating as a service in the Navy.

(Added Pub. L. 103–337, div. A, title XVI, §1661(a)(1), Oct. 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 2977; amended Pub. L. 107–296, title XVII, §1704(b)(1), Nov. 25, 2002, 116 Stat. 2314.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

Provisions similar to those in this section were contained in section 652 of this title, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 103–337, §1661(a)(3)(A).

#### Amendments

2002—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 107–296 substituted "of Homeland Security" for "of Transportation".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2002 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 107–296 effective on the date of transfer of the Coast Guard to the Department of Homeland Security, see section 1704(g) of Pub. L. 107–296, set out as a note under section 101 of this title.

#### Effective Date

Section effective Dec. 1, 1994, except as otherwise provided, see section 1691 of Pub. L. 103–337, set out as a note under section 10001 of this title.
### §2834. Participation in Department of State housing pools

(a) The Secretary concerned may enter into an agreement with the Secretary of State under which the Secretary of State agrees to provide housing and related services for personnel under the jurisdiction of the Secretary concerned who are assigned to duty in a foreign country if the Secretary concerned determines—

(1) that there is a shortage of adequate housing in the area of the foreign country in which such personnel are assigned to duty; and

(2) that participation in the Department of State housing pool is the most cost-effective means of providing housing for such personnel.

The Secretary concerned shall reimburse the Secretary of State, as provided in the agreement, for housing and related services furnished personnel under the jurisdiction of the Secretary concerned.

(b) The maximum lease amounts specified in section 2828(e)(1) of this title for the rental of family housing in foreign countries shall not apply to housing made available to the Department of Defense under this section. To the extent that the lease amount for units of housing made available under this subsection exceeds such maximum lease amounts, such units shall not be counted in applying the limitation contained in such section on the number of units of family housing for which the Secretary concerned may waive such maximum lease amounts.

(Added Pub. L. 99–167, title VIII, §808(a), Dec. 3, 1985, 99 Stat. 989; amended Pub. L. 101–510, div. A, title XIII, §1301(18), Nov. 5, 1990, 104 Stat. 1668; Pub. L. 103–160, div. B, title XXVIII, §2806, Nov. 30, 1993, 107 Stat. 1887.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1993—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 103–160 amended subsec. (b) generally. Prior to amendment, subsec. (b) read as follows: "In computing the number of leases for which the maximum lease amount may be waived by the Secretary concerned under the second sentence of section 2828(e)(1) of this title, housing made available to the Department of Defense under this section shall be included."

1990—Subsecs. (b), (c). Pub. L. 101–510 redesignated subsec. (c) as (b) and struck out former subsec. (b) which read as follows: "Agreements entered into with the Secretary of State under this section may not be executed until (1) the Secretary concerned provides to the appropriate committees of Congress written notification of the facts concerning the proposed agreement, and (2) a period of 21 days has elapsed after the day on which the notification is received by the committees."
#### § 169.14 How does the Paperwork Reduction Act affect this part?

The collections of information in this part have been approved by the Office of Management and Budget under 44 U.S.C. 3501 *et seq.* and assigned OMB Control Number 1076-0181. Response is required to obtain a benefit. A Federal agency may not conduct or sponsor, and you are not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB Control Number.
§ 1000.107 Must a Tribe/Consortium with a base budget or base budget-eligible program amounts negotiated before January 16, 2001 negotiate new Tribal shares and residual amounts? No, if a Tribe/Consortium negotiated amounts before January 16, 2001, it does not need to renegotiate new Tribal shares and residual amounts. ( a ) At Tribal option, a Tribe/Consortium may retain funding amounts that: ( 1 ) Were either base eligible or in the Tribe's base; and
( 2 ) Were negotiated before this part is promulgated.
( b ) If a Tribe/Consortium desires to renegotiate the amounts referred to in paragraph (a) of this section, the Tribe/Consortium must: ( 1 ) Negotiate all funding included in the AFA; and
( 2 ) Use the process for determining residuals and funding amounts on the same basis as other Tribes.
( c ) Self-governance Tribes/Consortia are eligible for funding amounts for new or available programs not previously included in the AFA on the same basis as other Tribes/Consortia.
**Exhibit 99.9**

 

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

 

We consent to the reference to our Firm under the captions “Attestation Report of the Registered Public Accounting Firm” and “Principal Accountant Fees and Services” and to the use in this Annual Report on Form 40-F filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission of our reports dated March 10, 2015, with respect to the statements of financial position of the Sprott Physical Platinum and Palladium Trust (“Trust”) as at December 31, 2014 and 2013, and the statements of comprehensive income (loss), unitholders equity and cash flows for each of the years in the two-year period ended December 31, 2014, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of the Trust as at December 31, 2014.

 

We also consent to the incorporation by reference of our reports dated March 10, 2015 in the Registration Statement (Form F-10 No. 333-195552).

 

 
|                  | */s/ “Ernst & Young LLP”* |
|-----------------------|----------------------------------------------|
| Toronto,   Canada     | Chartered   Professional Accountants         |
| March 27,   2015 | Licensed   Public Accountants                |

 

----
From~ To: Subject: Date: J as o o J e n s en EAS ( O S T) P l an e c h ang es Th urs d ay , A ugust 22, 20 1 3 6: 2 0:19 PM 

### We are oil and gas . . . denver is oil and gas . . . great lakes works for our corprate meetings . SLC makes no sense to oil and gas industry I know its a government but I hope they think this through .. . jason jensen general manager jd fieldservices . .. Sent from m y And

r oi d

,

.••. ~ . , , \
### §7686. Obsolete ordnance: gift to State homes for soldiers and sailors

Subject to regulations under section 121 of title 40, the Secretary of the Army may give not more than two obsolete bronze or iron cannons suitable for firing salutes to any home for soldiers or sailors established and maintained under State authority.

(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 263, §4686; Pub. L. 96–513, title V, §512(19), Dec. 12, 1980, 94 Stat. 2930; Pub. L. 107–217, §3(b)(27), Aug. 21, 2002, 116 Stat. 1297; renumbered §7686, Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, §808(d), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1839.)

| Revised section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 4686 | 50:66. | Feb. 8, 1889, ch. 116, 25 Stat. 657; Oct. 31, 1951, ch. 654, §2(27), 65 Stat. 707. |
| | | Mar. 3, 1899, ch. 423 (1st proviso under "Ordnance Department"), 30 Stat. 1073; May 26, 1900, ch. 586 (1st proviso under "Ordnance Department"), 31 Stat. 216; June 28, 1950, ch. 383, §402(e), 64 Stat. 273. |

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–232 renumbered section 4686 of this title as this section.

2002—Pub. L. 107–217 substituted "section 121 of title 40" for "section 205 of the Federal Property and Administrative Services Act of 1949 (40 U.S.C. 486)".

1980—Pub. L. 96–513 substituted "section 205 of the Federal Property and Administrative Services Act of 1949 (40 U.S.C. 486)" for "section 486 of title 40".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2018 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 115–232 effective Feb. 1, 2019, with provision for the coordination of amendments and special rule for certain redesignations, see section 800 of Pub. L. 115–232, set out as a note preceding section 3001 of this title.

#### Effective Date of 1980 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 96–513 effective Dec. 12, 1980, see section 701(b)(3) of Pub. L. 96–513, set out as a note under section 101 of this title.