alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 162.464 May BIA investigate compliance with a business lease? ( a ) We may enter the leased premises at any reasonable time, upon reasonable notice, and consistent with any notice requirements under applicable tribal law and applicable lease documents, to protect the interests of the Indian landowners and to determine if the lessee is in compliance with the requirements of the lease.
( b ) If an Indian landowner notifies us that a specific lease violation has occurred, we will promptly initiate an appropriate investigation.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 194 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 194

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 515) to prevent children 
                from injuring themselves with handguns.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 26, 1999

 Ms. DeGette (for herself, Mr. Blagojevich, and Ms. Carson) submitted 
 the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Rules

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 515) to prevent children 
                from injuring themselves with handguns.

    Resolved, That immediately upon the adoption of this resolution the 
House shall resolve itself into the Committee of the Whole House on the 
State of the Union for consideration of the bill (H.R. 515) to prevent 
children from injuring themselves with handguns. The first reading of 
the bill shall be dispensed with. All points of order against the bill 
and against its consideration are waived. General debate shall be 
confined to the bill and shall not exceed one hour equally divided and 
controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee 
on Judiciary. After general debate the bill shall be considered for 
amendment under the five-minute rule for a period not to exceed 10 
hours and shall be considered as read. At the conclusion of 
consideration of the bill for amendment, the Committee shall rise and 
report the bill to the House with such amendments as may have been 
adopted. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the 
bill and amendments thereto to final passage without intervening 
motion, except one motion to recommit with or without instructions.
                                 <all>
```
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsExperimental Investigation of Mars Science Laboratory Entry Vehicle Aeroheating in AEDC Hypervelocity Tunnel 9An experimental investigation of the aeroheating environment of the Mars Science Laboratory entry vehicle was conducted in the Arnold Engineering Development Complex Hypervelocity Wind Tunnel 9. Testing was performed on a 6-in. (0.1524 m) diameter model in the tunnel's Mach 8 and Mach 10 nozzles at free stream Reynolds numbers from 4.1×10*exp 6)/ft to 49×10(exp 6)/ft and from 1.2×10(exp 6)/ft to 19×10(exp 6)/ft, respectively, using pure nitrogen test gas. These conditions spanned the boundary layer flow regimes from completely laminar to fully turbulent flow over the entire forebody. A computational fluid dynamics study was conducted in support of the wind tunnel testing. Laminar and turbulent solutions were generated for all wind tunnel test conditions and comparisons of predicted heating distributions were performed with the data. These comparisons showed agreement for most cases to within the estimated +/-12% experimental uncertainty margin for fully-laminar or fully-turbulent conditions, while transitional heating data were bounded by laminar and turbulent predictions. These results helped to define uncertainty margins on the use of computational tools for vehicle design.Document ID20170009619Acquisition SourceLangley Research CenterDocument TypeTechnical Publication (TP)AuthorsHollis, Brian R.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Collier, Arnold S.*(Arnold Engineering Development Center Silver Spring, MD, United States)*Date AcquiredOctober 6, 2017Publication DateSeptember 1, 2017Subject CategorySpacecraft Design, Testing And PerformanceFluid Mechanics And ThermodynamicsReport/Patent NumberNASA/TP-2017-219658L-20542NF1676L-20881Funding Number(s)WBS: WBS 470883.04.07.01.03Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightPublic Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType20170009619.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Graham Packaging Holdings Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Philip R. Yates, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|   | 1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Graham Packaging Holdings Company. |
|--------|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

Date: November 14, 2005

 

 

| By:    | /s/ Philip R. Yates     |
|--------|-------------------------|
|   | Philip R. Yates         |
|   | Chief Executive Officer |
§ 170.109 How can State and local governments prevent discrimination or adverse impacts? ( a ) Under 23 U.S.C. 134 and 135, and 23 CFR part 450, State and local government officials shall consult and work with Tribes in the development of programs to: ( 1 ) Identify potential discrimination; and
( 2 ) Recommend corrective actions to avoid disproportionately high and adverse effects on Tribes and Indian populations.
( b ) Examples of adverse effects include, but are not limited to: ( 1 ) Impeding access to Tribal communities or activities;
( 2 ) Creating excessive access to culturally or religiously sensitive areas;
( 3 ) Negatively affecting natural resources, trust resources, Tribal businesses, religious, and cultural sites;
( 4 ) Harming indigenous plants and animals; and
( 5 ) Impairing the ability of Tribal members to engage in commercial, cultural, and religious activities.
#### In the Matter of Andy F., a Person Alleged to be a Juvenile Delinquent, Appellant.

[825 NYS2d 228]

In a juvenile delinquency proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 3, the appeal is from an order of disposition of the Family Court, Queens County (Hunt, J), dated August 8, 2005, which, upon a fact-finding order of the same court dated June 15, 2005, made after a hearing, finding that the appellant committed acts which, if committed by an adult, would have constituted the crimes of attempted robbery in the second *582degree, assault in the second degree, attempted grand larceny in the fourth degree, and menacing in the third degree, adjudged him to be a juvenile delinquent and placed him on probation for a period of two years and imposed other conditions. The appeal brings up for review the denial of that branch of the appellant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress identification testimony.

Ordered that the order of disposition is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The Family Court properly denied that branch of the appellant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress the in-court identification. Contrary to the appellant’s contention, there was no testimony or evidence from the *Wade*hearing *(see United States v Wade,*388 US 218 [1967]) or the fact-finding hearing to indicate that there was any police involvement in the prior out-of-court photographic identification procedure arranged by the school where the incident occurred. Accordingly, because the prior out-of-court identification was not the product of police action, the subsequent in-court identification was not subject to suppression on the ground of suggestiveness *(see Matter of Felix D.,*30 AD3d 598 [2006]; *Matter of Gilbert C.,*15 AD3d 172 [2005]; *Matter of Gabriel A.,*12 AD3d 666 [2004]; *cf. People v Smith,*139 AD2d 783, 784 [1988]; *People v Whitaker,*126 AD2d 688, 689 [1987]).

The Family Court also properly denied that branch of the appellant’s omnibus motion which was to preclude the in-court identification testimony based on the claimed untimelinfess of the notice of the additional out-of-court identification. Where, as here, the prior out-of-court identification procedure was not the product of police action, the presentment agency was not required to give notice of its intention to offer such identification testimony *(see Matter of Gilbert C., supra; Matter of Gabriel*A., *supra*at 667). Krausman, J.P., Rivera, Spolzino and Lifson, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 32 (Wednesday, February 16, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 9031]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-3481]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin 
Diseases; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of a meeting of the 
Board of Scientific Counselors, NIAMS.
    The meeting will be closed to the public as indicated below in 
accordance with the provisions set forth in section 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended for the review, discussion, and evaluation of 
individual intramural programs and projects conducted by the National 
Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases, including 
consideration of personnel qualifications and performance, and the 
competence of individual investigators, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Board of Scientific Counselors, NIAMS.
    Date: March 3-4, 2011.
    Time: 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate the Molecular Immunology and 
Inflammation Branch and the Laboratory of Skin Biology.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Building 31, 31 Center 
Drive, Conference Room 4C32, Bethesda, MD 20892.
    Contact Person: John J. O'Shea, MD, PhD, Scientific Director, 
National Institute of Arthritis & Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases, 
Building 10, Room 9N228, MSC 1820, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 496-
2612, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#79160a111c181339180b1b57171018140a57171011571e160f"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="cca3bfa4a9ada68cadbeaee2a2a5ada1bfe2a2a5a4e2aba3ba">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.846, 
Arthritis, Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases Research, National 
Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: February 9, 2011.
Jennifer S. Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2011-3481 Filed 2-15-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 35 (Tuesday, February 22, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 9809]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-3831]

[[Page 9809]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

U.S. Customs and Border Protection

Approval of SGS North America, Inc., as a Commercial Gauger

AGENCY: U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Department of Homeland 
Security.

ACTION: Notice of approval of SGS North America, Inc., as a commercial 
gauger.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to 19 CFR 151.13, SGS 
North America, Inc., 1267 N. Witter St., Pasadena, TX 77536, has been 
approved to gauge petroleum and petroleum products for customs purposes 
in accordance with the provisions of 19 CFR 151.13. Anyone wishing to 
employ this entity to conduct gauger services should request and 
receive written assurances from the entity that it is approved by the 
U.S. Customs and Border Protection to conduct the specific gauger 
service requested. Alternatively, inquiries regarding the specific 
gauger service this entity is approved to perform may be directed to 
the U.S. Customs and Border Protection by calling (202) 344-1060. The 
inquiry may also be sent to [email protected]. Please reference the Web 
site listed below for a complete listing of CBP approved gaugers and 
accredited laboratories. http://cbp.gov/xp/cgov/import/operations_support/labs_scientific_svcs/commercial_gaugers/.

DATES: The approval of SGS North America, Inc., as commercial gauger 
became effective on August 24, 2010. The next triennial inspection date 
will be scheduled for August 2013.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Anthony Malana, Laboratories and 
Scientific Services, U.S. Customs and Border Protection, 1300 
Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Suite 1500N, Washington, DC 20229, 202-344-
1060.

    Dated: February 10, 2011.
Ira S. Reese,
Executive Director, Laboratories and Scientific Services.
[FR Doc. 2011-3831 Filed 2-18-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-14-P
```
# Delegation of Reporting and Other Authorities 

# Memorandum for the Secretary of Agriculture 

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States, including section 301 of title 3, United States Code, I hereby delegate to you the functions and authority conferred upon the President by section 7 of the Soil and Water Resources Conservation Act of 1977 (16 U.S.C. 2006), as amended by section 2804 of the Food, Conservation, and Energy Act of 2008, to make the specified reports to the Congress.

                        You are authorized and directed to publish this memorandum in the                         *Federal Register*.                    

[FR Doc. 2011-3818

Billing code 3410-10-P
### §352. Naval Small Craft Instruction and Technical Training School

(a) In General.—The Secretary of Defense may operate an education and training facility known as the "Naval Small Craft Instruction and Technical Training School" (in this section referred to as the "School").

(b) Designation of Executive Agent.—The Secretary of Defense shall designate the Secretary of a military department as the Department of Defense executive agent for carrying out the responsibilities of the Secretary of Defense under this section.

(c) Purpose.—The purpose of the School shall be to provide to the military and other security forces of one or more friendly foreign countries education and training under any other provision of law related to naval small craft instruction and training and to increase professionalism, readiness, and respect for human rights through formal courses of instruction or mobile training teams for—

(1) the operation, employment, maintenance, and logistics of specialized equipment;

(2) participation in—

(A) joint exercises; or

(B) coalition or international military operations; and

(3) improved interoperability between—

(A) the armed forces; and

(B) the military and other security forces of the one or more friendly foreign countries.

(d) Limitation on Personnel Eligible To Receive Education and Training.—The Secretary of Defense may not provide education or training at the School to any personnel of a country that is prohibited from receiving such education or training under any other provision of law.

(e) Fixed Costs.—The fixed costs of operation and maintenance of the School in a fiscal year may be paid from amounts made available for such fiscal year for operation and maintenance of the Department of Defense.

(f) Annual Report.—Not later than March 15 each year, the Secretary of Defense, with the concurrence of the Secretary of State, shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a detailed report on the activities and operating costs of the School during the preceding fiscal year.

(Added Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title XII, §1208(a)(1), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 2021.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Limitation on Use of Funds

Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title XII, §1208(c), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 2022, provided that:

"(1) In general.—Nothing in section 352 of title 10, United States Code (as so added), may be construed as authorizing the use of funds appropriated for the Department of Defense for any purpose described in paragraph (2) unless specifically authorized by an Act of Congress other than that section or this Act [see Tables for classification].

"(2) Purposes.—The purposes described in this paragraph are the following:

"(A) The operation of a facility other than the Naval Small Craft Instruction and Technical Training School that is in operation as of the date of the enactment of this Act [Aug. 13, 2018] for the provision of education and training authorized to be provided by the School.

"(B) The construction or expansion of any facility of the School."
#### In the Matter of the Settlement of the Accounts of Ten Eyck Bunker, as Administrator with the Will Annexed of Mary Bunker, Jr., Deceased, of Mary Bunker, Sr., Deceased, of Weston Bunker, Deceased, and as Administrator de Bonis Non of Josephine C. Bunker, Deceased. Ten Eyck Bunker, Individually and as Administrator, etc., and Others, Appellants; Syracuse Trust Company, as Trustee, Respondent.

—Decree of Surrogate’s Court affirmed, without costs. All concurred.
§ 151.16 How are formalization of acceptance and trust status attained? ( a ) The Secretary shall formalize acceptance of land in trust status by signing an instrument of conveyance. The Secretary shall sign the instrument of conveyance after the requirements of §§ 151.13, 151.14, and 151.15 have been met.
( b ) The land will attain trust status when the Secretary signs the instrument of conveyance.
( c ) The Secretary shall record the deed with LTRO pursuant to part 150 of this chapter.
#### § 137.6 Power development.

The cost of the power development at the Coolidge Dam is hereby fixed at $735,000. The net revenues derived from the operation of this power development shall be disposed of as required by the terms and conditions of the act of March 7, 1928 (45 Stat. 210) as supplemented or amended.
EX-10.1




 Exhibit 10.1 

AMENDMENT LETTER 
 SVF
Investment Corp. 3 
 Walkers Corporate Limited 

190 Elgin Avenue 
 George Town 

Grand Cayman KY1-9008 

Cayman Islands 
 SVF Sponsor III
(DE) LLC 
 c/o Corporation Service Company 

251 Little Falls Drive 
 Wilmington DE
19809, U.S. 
 Ladies and Gentlemen: 
 This letter amends the
loan agreement dated 10 August 2021 between SVF Investment Corp. 3 (the “Borrower”) and SVF Sponsor III (DE) LLC (the “Lender”), entered into in connection with the loan facility made available to the Borrower
by the Lender (the “Loan Agreement”). Terms used in this letter and not defined have the meanings given to such terms in the Loan Agreement. 

Pursuant to Clause 15 (Amendments and Waivers) and the definition of “Commitment” in Clause 1.1 (Definitions) of the Loan Agreement,
the Borrower and the Lender may agree a higher amount of Commitment to be made available for the loan facility. The Borrower and the Lender hereby consent to and agree that the Commitment be increased from U.S.$2,000,000 to U.S.$3,000,000 with
effect from the date of this letter. 
 This letter may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original but all of
which taken together shall constitute one and the same instrument. 
 The provisions of Clause 18 (Governing Law) and Clause 19 (Enforcement)
of the Loan Agreement shall apply to this letter as if set out here in full. 
 The Borrower 

 

					
	By:	  	)	  	/s/ Ioannis Pipilis
		  	)	  	
	For and on behalf of	  	)	  	  

	SVF Investment Corp. 3	  	)	  	Name: Ioannis Pipilis
		  		  	Title: Chief Executive Officer

 The Lender  
  

					
	By:	  	)	  	
		  	)	  	/s/ Kokoro Motegi
	For and on behalf of	  	) 	  	  

	SVF Sponsor III (DE) LLC	  	)	  	Name: Kokoro Motegi
		  		  	Title: Manager
106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 92

AN ACT

To designate the Federal building and United

States Courthouse’’.‘‘Hiram H. Ward Federal Building and UnitedStreet in Winston-Salem, North Carolina, as theStates courthouse located at 251 North Main
106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 92

AN ACT

To designate the Federal building and United States courthouse located at 251 North Main Street in WinstonSalem, North Carolina, as the ‘‘Hiram H. Ward Federal

Building and United States Courthouse’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 92 EH

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

2 The Federal building and United States courthouse

3 located at 251 North Main Street in Winston-Salem,

4 North Carolina, shall be known and designated as the

5 ‘‘Hiram H. Ward Federal Building and United States

6 Courthouse’’.

7 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

8 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

9 paper, or other record of the United States to the Federal

10 building referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be

11 a reference to the ‘‘Hiram H. Ward Federal Building and

12 United States Courthouse’’.

Passed the House of Representatives February 23,

1999.

Attest:

Clerk.
#### § 162.245 When will a BIA decision to approve an amendment, assignment, sublease, or mortgage under an agricultural lease be effective?

Our decision to approve an amendment, assignment, sublease, or mortgage under an agricultural lease will be effective immediately, notwithstanding any appeal that may be filed under part 2 of this chapter. Copies of approved documents will be provided to the party requesting approval, and made available to the Indian landowners upon request.
# C_2013201EN.01001301.xml

| 13.7.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 201/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.7.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 201/13

---

DECISION TO CLOSE THE FORMAL INVESTIGATION PROCEDURE AFTER WITHDRAWAL BY MEMBER STATE

State aid — Spain

(Articles 107 to 109 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union)

Commission notice pursuant to Article 108(2) of the TFEU — Withdrawal of notification

State aid SA.31273 (12/C) (ex N 313/10) — Ultracongelados Antártida SA

(Text with EEA relevance)

2013/C 201/11

The Commission has decided to close the formal investigation procedure under Article 108(2) of the TFEU, initiated on 21 November 2012 (1) in respect of the measure referred to above, recording that Spain has withdrawn its notification on 13 December 2012 and will not pursue this aid project further.

1

---

(1)  OJ C 359, 21.11.2012, p. 11.

1

---