alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### Geology of northern Nellis Air Force Base bombing and gunnery range, Nye County, Nevada

By: E.B. EkrenR.E. AndersonC.L. RogersD. C. Noble

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/pp651

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plate:  **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
### **CHAPTER 1225—RETIRED GRADE**

Sec.
12771.
Reserve officers: grade on transfer to Retired Reserve.
12772.
Reserve commissioned officers who have served as Attending Physician to the Congress: grade on transfer to Retired Reserve.
12773.
Limitation on accrual of increased pay or benefits.
12774.
Retired lists.
§ 166.900 How are the Indian agriculture education programs operated? ( a ) The purpose of the Indian agriculture education programs is to recruit and develop promising Indian and Alaska Natives who are enrolled in secondary schools, tribal or Alaska Native community colleges, and other post-secondary schools for employment as professional resource managers and other agriculture-related professionals by approved organizations.
( b ) We will operate the student educational employment program as part of our Indian agriculture education programs in accordance with the provisions of 5 CFR 213.3202(a) and (b).
( c ) We will establish an education committee to coordinate and carry out the agriculture education assistance programs and to select participants for all agriculture education assistance programs. The committee will include at least one Indian professional educator in the field of natural resources or agriculture, a personnel specialist, a representative of the Intertribal Agriculture Council, and a natural resources or agriculture professional from the BIA and a representative from American Indian Higher Education Consortium. The committee's duties will include the writing of a manual for the Indian and Alaska Native Agriculture Education and Assistance Programs.
( d ) We will monitor and evaluate the agriculture education assistance programs to ensure that there are adequate Indian and Alaska Native natural resources and agriculture-related professionals to manage Indian natural resources and agriculture programs by or for tribes and Alaska Native Corporations. We will identify the number of participants in the intern, student educational employment program, scholarship, and outreach programs; the number of participants who completed the requirements to become a natural resources or agriculture-related professional; and the number of participants completing advanced degree requirements.
#### STATE v. JONES

No. 43P90

Case below: 96 N.C.App. 389

Motion by the Attorney General to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 1 March 1990. Petition by defendant for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 1 March 1990.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Valiant Shield 16: Ready Group Returns More Capable, Battle Ready

By Sgt. Jessica Quezada

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More Articles/News
#### § 213.45 Restrictions especially continued as to certain lands.

Restricted lands allotted as either homestead or surplus allotments, designated as tax exempt under section 4 of the act of May 10, 1928, as amended May 24, 1928 (45 Stat. 495, 733), the entire interest in which was acquired by inheritance, gift, devise, or purchase with restricted funds, by persons of one-half or more Indian blood, after the passage of the act of January 27, 1933 (47 Stat. 777), continue to be restricted under the provisions of the last mentioned act and oil and gas leases thereof are subject to the regulations in this part and all such leases to be valid must be approved by the Secretary of the Interior. Lands inherited by or devised to full blood Indians prior to the act of January 27, 1933, are not affected as to restrictions by the provisions of said act and may continue to be leased with the approval of the county court having jurisdiction of the estate of the deceased allottee and without approval of the Secretary of the Interior (54 L.D. 382; 10 F. (2d), 487). Lands acquired prior to the passage of the act of January 27, 1933 by Indians of less than full blood, whether such lands were restricted and tax exempt or restricted and taxable, passed to such persons free of all restrictions. Inherited homesteads restricted prior to April 26, 1931, by section 9,[2] of the act of May 27, 1908 (35 Stat. 312), for the benefit of heirs of one-half or more Indian blood but less than full bloods, born after March 4, 1906, became unrestricted April 26, 1931, or upon the death prior thereto of the heir born subsequent to March 4, 1906, and oil and gas leases thereof are not subject to the regulations in this part nor under the jurisdiction of the Secretary of the Interior.

###### Footnotes -
  213.45

[2] Repealed restrictions on inherited homesteads, by sec. 2 of the act of May 10, 1928 (45 Stat. 495).
§ 11.600 Marriages. ( a ) A magistrate of the Court of Indian Offenses shall have the authority to perform marriages.
( b ) A valid marriage shall be constituted by: ( 1 ) The issuance of a marriage license by the Court of Indian Offenses and by execution of a consent to marriage by both parties to the marriage and recorded with the clerk of the court; or
( 2 ) The recording of a tribal custom marriage with the Court of Indian Offenses within 30 days of the tribal custom marriage ceremony by the signing by both parties of a marriage register maintained by the clerk of the court.
( c ) A marriage license application shall include the following information: ( 1 ) Name, sex, occupation, address, social security number, and date and place of birth of each party to the proposed marriage;
( 2 ) If either party was previously married, his or her name, and the date, place, and court in which the marriage was dissolved or declared invalid or the date and place of death of the former spouse;
( 3 ) Name and address of the parents or guardian of each party;
( 4 ) Whether the parties are related to each other and, if so, their relationship; and
( 5 ) The name and date of birth of any child of which both parties are parents, born before the making of the application, unless their parental rights and the parent and child relationship with respect to the child have been terminated.
( 6 ) A certificate of the results of any medical examination required by either applicable tribal ordinances, or the laws of the State in which the Indian country under the jurisdiction of the Court of Indian Offenses is located.
#### § 150.3 May Tribes administer this part on LTRO's behalf?

A Tribe may contract or compact under the Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act (25 U.S.C. 5301 *et seq.*) to administer on LTRO's behalf any portion of this part that is not an inherently Federal function.
#### § 2.700 What is the purpose of this subpart?

The purpose of this subpart is to expedite administrative review of a Bureau decision to recognize, or to decline to recognize, a Tribal representative. Provisions in subparts A through F of this part also apply, except that, if a provision in this subpart conflicts with a provision in subparts A through F of this part, the provision in this subpart will govern.
#### § 161.307 When may a permittee commence grazing on Navajo Partitioned Land?

The permittee may graze on Navajo Partitioned Land on the date specified in the permit as the beginning date of the term, but not before BIA approves the permit.
Exhibit 32.1 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of QuadTech International, Inc. (the"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended July 31, 2007 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, JohnMeier, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to QuadTech International, Inc. and will be retained by QuadTechInternational,, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission orits staff upon request. 

|  

 
*September 11, 2007*
 
*"signed J Meier"

John Meier

President and Chief Executive    Officer*
 

 
  |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
### §20216. Reports of selection boards

(a) In General.—Each selection board convened under section 20211 of this title shall submit to the Secretary of the Air Force a written report, signed by each member of the board, containing a list of the names of the officers it recommends for promotion and certifying—

(1) that the board has carefully considered the record of each officer whose name was furnished to it under section 615 of this title; and

(2) that, in the opinion of a majority of the members of the board, the officers recommended for promotion by the board are best qualified for promotion to meet the needs of the Space Force (as noted in the guidelines or information furnished the board under section 615(b) of this title) among those officers whose names were furnished to the selection board.

(b) Officers Who Should Be Required to Show Cause for Retention.—A selection board convened under section 20211 of this title shall include in its report the name of any officer before it for consideration for promotion whose record, in the opinion of a majority of the members of the board, indicates that the officer should be required under section 20503 of this title to show cause for the officer's retention in a space force active status.

(c) Officers Recommended to Be Placed Higher on the Promotion List.—A selection board convened under section 20211 of this title shall, when authorized under section 20214(g) 1 of this title, include in its report the names of those officers recommended by the board to be placed higher on the promotion list and the order in which the board recommends that those officers should be placed on the list.

(d) Recommendation for Officers to Be Excluded From Future Consideration for Promotion.—A selection board convened under section 20211 of this title may include in its report a recommendation that an officer considered by the board be excluded from future consideration for promotion under this chapter.

(Added Pub. L. 118–31, div. A, title XVII, §1716(c), Dec. 22, 2023, 137 Stat. 637.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Section 20214 of this title, referred to in subsec. (c), does not contain a subsec. (g). However, section 20215(g) of this title relates to board recommendation for higher placement on a promotion list.

1 See References in Text note below.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. This archiveassures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access to publicationsin the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging and locatorservices, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications (CGP). Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event that publicationsare no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Stockpile stewardship andmanagement plan : report to Congress.**
 
2014 | 2015| 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019
2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023| 2024
 
SuDoc Number:E 11.20:
Item Number:0430-R-16 (online)
CGP systemNumber:001040949
 
January 11, 2018
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 81 (Monday, April 28, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 23328]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-09696]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meeting Notice

TIME AND DATE: Wednesday April 30, 2014, 10 a.m.--12 p.m.

PLACE: Hearing Room 420, Bethesda Towers, 4330 East West Highway, 
Bethesda, Maryland.

STATUS: Commission Meeting--Open to the Public.
    Matter To Be Considered: Briefing Matter: Frame Back Carrier--NPR.
    A live webcast of the Meeting can be viewed at www.cpsc.gov/live.
    For a recorded message containing the latest agenda information, 
call (301) 504-7948.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Todd A. Stevenson, Office of the 
Secretary, U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, 4330 East West 
Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814, (301) 504-7923.

    Dated: April 23, 2014.
Todd A. Stevenson,
Secretariat.
[FR Doc. 2014-09696 Filed 4-24-14; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 6355-01-P
```
## In t he Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06

- 23

- 00055

- CV

KORDARYL THOMPSON , Appellant

V.
JOSE GUADALUPE CISNEROS , Appellee

On Appeal from the 71st District Court Harrison County, Texas Trial Court No. 18

- 1405

Before Stevens , C.J., van Cleef and Rambin , JJ. Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice Stevens2 

### ME MORANDUM OPINION

Ko rdaryl Thompson , appellant, filed a notice of appeal in this matter on June 26 , 20 2 3

. Appellant did not file a docket ing statement in accordance with Rule 32.1 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 32.1. Further, appellant did not tender the mandatory $20 5.00 filing fee associated with the appeal , see T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 5, and did not file proof of indigency in li eu of a filing fee , s ee T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 20.1. “A party who is not excused by statute or these rules from paying costs must pay

— at the time an item is presented for filing

— whatever fees are required by statute or Supreme Court order. The appellate court may enforce this rule by any order that is just.” T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 5

. By letter dated July 17 , 20 2 3 , we provided appellant with notice of and an opportunity to
cure these defects. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.3(b) , (c)

. The clerk’s letter further warned app ellant that, if he did not submit an adequate response to the notice by July 2 7 , 20 2 3 , t his appeal would be subject to dismiss al for want of prosecution and for failure to comply with the above

- cited

r ules

. A ppellant did not file a docketing statement, di d not pa y the mandatory filing fee, and did not file proof of indigency in lieu of a filing fee. Further, w e have received no communication
from appellant responsive to the July 17 correspondence

. Accordingly, this appeal is ripe for
dismissal.3

Pursuan t to Rules 42.3 , subsections (b) and (c) , of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, we dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution.

Scott E. Stevens Chief Justice
Date Submitted : August 8, 2023 Date Decided: August 9, 2023
||
||
| CALIFORNIA COUNTIES DESIGNATED BYPRESIDENT CLINTON AS DISASTER AREAS BECAUSE OFFLOODING IN 1995Alameda *1*         Madera *2*        San Mateo *1*Amador *2*          Marin *2*           Santa Barbara *2*Butte *2*               Mendocino *2*  Santa Clara *2*Colusa *2*            Modoc *1*         Santa Cruz *2*Contra Costa *1*  Monterey *2*     Shasta *1*Del Norte *1*        Napa *2*           Sierra *3*El Dorado *1*       Nevada *1*        Solano *1*Fresno *3*            Orange *2*         Sonoma *2*Glenn *2*              Placer *2*          Stanislaus *3*Humboldt *2*        Plumas *2*         Sutter *2*Imperial *3*           Riverside *2*     Tehama *1*Inyo *3*                Sacramento *2*  Trinity *1*Kern *2*               San Benito *3*   Tulare *3*Kings *3*              San Bernadino *2*   Ventura *2*Lake *2*               San Diego *2*          Yolo *2*Lassen *2*            San Luis Obispo *2* Yuba *2*Los Angeles *2*--------------------------*1*  FFEL waiver period January 1 through March 31.  All normal FFEL        regulatory requirements resume on April 1.*2*  FFEL waiver period January 1 through April 30.  All normal FFEL        regulatory requirements  resume on May 1.*3*  FFEL waiver period February 1 through April 30.  All normal FFEL        regulatory requirements resume on May 1. |
||
| FOIA |      Privacy |      Security |      NoticesWhiteHouse.gov |      USA.gov |      ED.gov |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
**Exhibit 10.6****QUICKSILVER RESOURCES INC.****Description of Non-Employee Director Compensation**     Beginning in 2007, each non-employee director of Quicksilver Resources Inc. receives an annualfee of $205,000. Each non-employee director is paid $99,000 of the annual fee in restricted stockunder the Quicksilver Resources Inc. 2006 Equity Plan (the “Plan”). Each non-employee director ispaid the remaining $106,000 of the annual fee in cash, unless the non-employee director makes anappropriate election under the Plan to receive some or all of the remaining $106,000 of the annualfee in restricted stock or options to purchase common stock.
EXHIBIT 35.1  ANNUAL SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT PURSUANT TO ITEM 1123 OF REGULATION AB

CARMAX BUSINESS SERVICES, LLC

The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of CarMax Business Services, LLC, as Servicer pursuant to Section 3.10 of the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of February 1, 2012 (the Sale
and Servicing Agreement) among CarMax Auto Owner Trust 2012-1, as Issuer (the Issuer), CarMax Auto Funding LLC, as Depositor, CarMax Business Services, LLC, as Servicer (the Servicer), and Wells Fargo Bank, National
Association, as Backup Servicer does hereby certify that:



| | 1. | CarMax Business Services, LLC is, as of the date hereof, the Servicer under the Sale and Servicing Agreement.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The undersigned is duly authorized to execute and deliver this Officers Certificate.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 3. | A review of the activities of the Servicer during the period beginning on February 16, 2012 and ending on February 29, 2012 and of the Servicers
performance under the Sale and Servicing Agreement was made under my supervision. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Sale and Servicing Agreement in all material respects
throughout such period.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Capitalized terms used in this certificate and not otherwise defined herein have the
meanings assigned to them in the Sale and Servicing Agreement.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned, a duly authorized officer
of the Servicer, has duly executed this Officers Certificate this 29th day of May, 2012.



CARMAX BUSINESS SERVICES, LLC/s/ Thomas W. ReedyThomas W. ReedyExecutive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
MIDLAND CAPITAL HOLDINGS CORPORATION

EXHIBIT 11 - STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE


                                                             Three Months Ended
                                                                September 30,
                                                              2001        2000
                                                              ----        ----

Net Income                                                  $164,219    $105,598
                                                            ========    ========

Weighted average common shares outstanding
  for basic computation                                      363,975     363,975
                                                            ========    ========
Basic earnings per share                                    $   0.45    $   0.29
                                                            ========    ========

Weighted average common shares outstanding
  for basic computation                                      363,975     363,975

Common stock equivalents due to dilutive effect
  of stock options                                             4,744       1,920

Weighted average common shares and equivalents
  Outstanding for diluted computation                        368,719     365,895

Diluted earnings per share                                  $   0.45    $   0.29
#### § 115.809 May a tribe recommend to OTFM how to invest the tribe's trust funds?

Tribes may recommend certain investments to OTFM, but the recommendations must be in accordance with the statutory requirements set forth in 25 U.S.C. §§ 161a and 162a. The OTFM will make the final investment decision based on prudent investment practices.