alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2013376EN.01001402.xml

| 21.12.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 376/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.12.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 376/14

---

Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries

2013/C 376/11

In accordance with Article 35(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), a decision has been taken to close the fishery as set down in the following table:

1

| Date and time of closure | 2.12.2013 |
| --- | --- |
| Duration | 2.12.2013-31.12.2013 |
| Member State | Portugal |
| Stock or group of stocks | GFB/89- |
| Species | Greater forkbeard (Phycis blennoides) |
| Zone | EU and international waters of VIII and IX |
| Type(s) of fishing vessels | — |
| Reference number | FS79/DSS |

Date and time of closure

2.12.2013

Duration

2.12.2013-31.12.2013

Member State

Portugal

Stock or group of stocks

GFB/89-

Species

Greater forkbeard (Phycis blennoides)

Phycis blennoides

Zone

EU and international waters of VIII and IX

Type(s) of fishing vessels

—

Reference number

FS79/DSS

---

(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.

1

---
### §1608. Time-limited appointments

(a) Authority for Time-Limited Appointments.—The Secretary of Defense may by regulation authorize appointing officials to make time-limited appointments to defense intelligence positions specified in the regulations.

(b) Review of Use of Authority.—The Secretary of Defense shall review each time-limited appointment in a defense intelligence position at the end of the first year of the period of the appointment and determine whether the appointment should be continued for the remainder of the period. The continuation of a time-limited appointment after the first year shall be subject to the approval of the Secretary.

(c) Condition on Permanent Appointment to Defense Intelligence Senior Executive Service.—An employee serving in a defense intelligence position pursuant to a time-limited appointment is not eligible for a permanent appointment to a Defense Intelligence Senior Executive Service position (including a position in which the employee is serving) unless the employee is selected for the permanent appointment on a competitive basis.

(d) Time-Limited Appointment Defined.—In this section, the term "time-limited appointment" means an appointment (subject to the condition in subsection (b)) for a period not to exceed two years.

(Added Pub. L. 104–201, div. A, title XVI, §1632(b), Sept. 23, 1996, 110 Stat. 2748.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 1608 was renumbered section 1623 of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Oct. 1, 1996, see section 1635 of Pub. L. 104–201, set out as an Effective Date of 1996 Amendment note under section 1593 of this title.
# C_2013312EN.01002101.xml

| 26.10.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 312/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 312/21

---

Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries

2013/C 312/10

In accordance with Article 35(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), a decision has been taken to close the fishery as set down in the following table:

1

| Date and time of closure | 29.9.2013 |
| --- | --- |
| Duration | 29.9.2013-31.12.2013 |
| Member State | France |
| Stock or group of stocks | LIN/05EI. |
| Species | Ling (Molva molva) |
| Zone | EU and international waters of V |
| Type(s) of fishing vessels | — |
| Reference number | 58/TQ40 |

Date and time of closure

29.9.2013

Duration

29.9.2013-31.12.2013

Member State

France

Stock or group of stocks

LIN/05EI.

Species

Ling (Molva molva)

Molva molva

Zone

EU and international waters of V

Type(s) of fishing vessels

—

Reference number

58/TQ40

---

(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.

1

---
### §18502. Reserve components: supplies, services, and facilities

(a) The Secretary concerned shall make available to the reserve components under his jurisdiction the supplies, services, and facilities of the armed forces under his jurisdiction that he considers necessary to support and develop those components.

(b) Whenever he finds it to be in the best interest of the United States, the Secretary concerned may issue supplies of the armed forces under his jurisdiction to the reserve components under his jurisdiction, without charge to the appropriations for those components for the cost or value of the supplies or for any related expense.

(c) Whenever he finds it to be in the best interest of the United States, the Secretary of the Army or the Secretary of the Air Force may issue to the Army National Guard or the Air National Guard, as the case may be, supplies of the armed forces under his jurisdiction that are in addition to supplies issued to that National Guard under section 702 of title 32 or charged against its appropriations under section 106 or 107 of title 32, without charge to the appropriations for those components for the cost or value of the supplies or for any related expense.

(d) Supplies issued under subsection (b) or (c) may be repossessed or redistributed as prescribed by the Secretary concerned.

(Added Pub. L. 103–337, div. A, title XVI, §1664(c)(1), Oct. 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 3012.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

Provisions similar to those in this section were contained in section 2540 of this title, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 103–337, §1664(c)(2).

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Dec. 1, 1994, except as otherwise provided, see section 1691 of Pub. L. 103–337, set out as a note under section 10001 of this title.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Peregrine Industries, Inc. (the“Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2005 (the“Report”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof, I, Ivo Heiden, CFO of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

/s/ Ivo Heiden

Ivo HeidenCFO and DirectorDated: November 14, 2005

A signed original of this writtenstatement required by Section 906 has been provided to Peregrine Industries, Inc. and willbe retained by Peregrine Industries, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.
§ 162.001 What is the purpose of this part? ( a ) The purpose of this part is to promote leasing on Indian land for housing, economic development, and other purposes.
( b ) This part specifies: ( 1 ) Conditions and authorities under which we will approve leases of Indian land and may issue permits on Government land;
( 2 ) How to obtain leases;
( 3 ) Terms and conditions required in leases;
( 4 ) How we administer and enforce leases; and
( 5 ) Special requirements for leases made under special acts of Congress that apply only to certain Indian reservations.
( c ) If any section, paragraph, or provision of this part is stayed or held invalid, the remaining sections, paragraphs, or provisions of this part remain in full force and effect.
#### Charles E. Cessna et al. v. Otis M. Benedict.

1. Appellate Court *Practice*— Assignments *of Error*Necessary.— In a case on appeal in the Appellate Court, where there are no errors assigned, as required by the rules, there is nothing before the court for consideration.

S. *Waiver*— Of *a Demurrer in Chancery Suits.*— -In a chancery proceeding, where there is a demurrer on file and the attention of the trial court is not called to it during the pendency of the case in the court below, the demurrer must be considered as waived.

3. Assignments of *Error*— Are *Essential.*— The assignment of error is not a form, but is essential.

Bill in Chancery. — Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hon. Richard S. Tuthill, Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the October term, 1900.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed November 26, 1901.

A. S. Kobebtson, William S. Hewburgek and Edward I. Buoklin, attorneys for appellants.

Hornstein & Coith, attorneys for appellee.

Opinion

per Curiam.

This is an appeal from a chancery decree. The principal *441objections seem to be, first, that the evidence did not warrant the finding that the transactions between appellant Cessna and appellee, were in the nature of an open account, upon which appellee charged and received usurious interest, and the finding that the entire debt had been in fact paid; second, that there was a demurrer still pending and undisposed of when the cause was referred to the master and when the final decree was entered; third, that the decree includes in the judgment for costs the fees of the master and his stenographer, and is excessive; fourth, that appellant Card, to whom notes in controversy were transferred by Cessna, was not an innocent purchaser thereof.

There are no assignments of error, and there is therefore nothing before this court for consideration. If, however, we were at liberty to consider the points made in the briefs, we should be compelled to conclude that the finding of facts by the court was warranted by the evidence; that the demurrer was waived; that the question as to the master’s charges was not raised in the trial court; and that the evidence justified the conclusion that appellant Card was not an innocent purchaser for value,

Assignments of error are not a mere form, but are essential. Ditch v. Sinnott, 116 Ill. 288; Taylor v. Wright, 121 Ill. 455-468; Lang v. Max, 50 Ill. App. 465; French v. Meehan, 77 Ill. App. 577.

The judgment of the Circuit Court must be affirmed.
### T e xa s - L o u i s i a n a M i s s i s s i p p i S a l t B a s i n G r

e a t e r G r e e n R iv e r B a s i n

W

. G u l f C o a s t B a s i n 

### Ap p a l a c h i a n B a s i n W

i n d R iv e r B a s i n

E a s t e r n S h e l f N W S h e l f

A b o S u s s e x - S h a n n o n M u d d y J M e s a v e r d e L a n c e - L e w i s 

### M e d i n a/ C l i n t o n -Tu s c a r o ra B r

a d f o r d - V e n a n g o - E l k B e r e a - M u r r y s v i l l e

P i ce a n ce

B a s i n

B o s s i e r 

### W

i l l i s t o n B a s i n

F t W o r t h B a s i n D a v i s B i g h o r n B a s i n J u d i t h R i v e r E a g l e

P e r m i a n

B a s i n A n a d a r k o B a s i n D e n v e r B a s i n

S a n J u a n

B a s i n N o r t h - C e n t r a l M o nt a n a A r e a

U i n t a B as i n

A u s t i n C h a l k C o d e l l - N i o b r a r a

P e n n - P e r m C a r b o n a t e N i o b r a r a C h a l k

D a k o t a

M o r r o w M e s a v e r d e

T h i r ty O n e C l e v e l a n d

O z o n a C a n y o n Wa s a t c h M e s a v e r d e

R e d F o r k M e s a v e r d e G r a n i t e Wa s h

S t u a r t C i ty - E d w a r d s B ow d o i n G r e e n h o r n

T r a v i s P ea k

O l m o s C o t t o n V a l l e y

V i c k s b u r g W i l c o x L o b o P i c t u r e d C l i f f s C r e t a c e o u s

C r

e t a c e o u s - L o w e r T e r t i a r y

M a n co s D a k o t a

G i l m e r L i m e 

# M a j o r T i g h t G a s P l a y s , L o w e r 4 8 S t a t e s

0 2 0 0 4 0 0 1 0 0 3 0 0 M i l e s 

# ±

S o u r c e : E n e r g y I n f o r m a t i o n A d m i n i s t r a t i o n b a s e d o n d a t a f ro m v a r i o u s p u b l i s h e d s t u d i e s U p d a t e d J u n e 6 , 2 0 1 0 I nt e r -B a s i n A r e a s T i g h t G a s P l a y s B a s i n s S ta c k e d P l a y s

D e e p e s t / O l d e st S h a l l o w e st / Yo u n g e st
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

March 16, 2017 Via EDGAR Securities and Exchange Commission 100 F Street, N.E. Washington, D.C. 20549

 

Re: Certification pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350)

 

Ladies and Gentlemen:

 

In connection with the Annual Report of SandRidge Mississippian Trust II (the “Trust”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, not in its individual capacity but solely as the Trustee of the Trust, certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, that to its knowledge:

 

(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.

 

The above certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.

 
|   | By:    | /s/ SARAH   NEWELL                                                                                              |
|--------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   | Sarah   Newell                                                                                                       |
|   |   | Vice   President   The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as   Trustee of SandRidge Mississippian Trust II |

 

----
#### Alexander J. Scott, as Administrator, etc., of Joseph J. Scott, Deceased, Respondent, v. Nina Spencer and Alvan R. Johnson, Appellants, Impleaded with Simon H. Smith and Others, Defendants.

Judgment affirmed, with costs *911No opinion. Woodward, Gaynor, Rich and Miller, JJ., concurred; Hirschberg,, P. J., not voting.
### §2200h. Program elements

In establishing the program, the Secretary of Defense shall determine the following:

(1) A methodology to identify and target critical skills gaps in Department of Defense occupations relating to acquisition, science, engineering, or other civilian occupations determined by the Secretary of Defense.

(2) A mechanism to track and report the success of the program in eliminating any critical skills gaps identified under paragraph (1).

(3) Criteria for an accredited civilian educational institution to participate in the program.

(4) The eligibility of a student to become a member of the program.

(5) Criteria required for a member of the program to receive financial assistance from the Department of Defense.

(6) The term of service as an employee of the Department of Defense required for a member of the program to receive such financial assistance.

(7) Criteria required for a member of the program to be released from a term of service.

(8) The method by which a successful graduate of the program may gain immediate employment in the Department of Defense.

(9) Resources required for implementation of the program.

(Added Pub. L. 116–92, div. A, title VIII, §860(a), Dec. 20, 2019, 133 Stat. 1514; amended Pub. L. 116–283, div. A, title X, §1081(a)(4)(A), Jan. 1, 2021, 134 Stat. 3870.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2021—Pub. L. 116–283 substituted "§" for "SEC." in section designation.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with
Amendment No. 1 to the Quarterly Report of SkyLynx Communications, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ended
September 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), we, Gary L. Brown, President and Acting Chief Financial Officer and K. Bryan Shobe, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                              
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     |                                                                                                                                                    
| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/ Gary L.
Brown

/s/ K. Bryan Shobe                              K. Bryan Shobe, Chief Executive Officer
May 25, 2006
#### § 161.802 How will the Navajo Nation recommend amendments to this part?

The Resources Committee will have final authority on behalf of the Navajo Nation to approve amendments to the Navajo Partitioned Lands grazing provisions, upon the recommendation of the Grazing Committee and the Navajo-Hopi Land Commission, and the concurrence of BIA.
#### § 161.300 When is a permit needed to authorize grazing use?

Unless otherwise provided for in this part, any person or legal entity, including an independent legal entity owned and operated by the Navajo Nation, must obtain a permit under this part before using Navajo Partitioned Land for grazing purposes.
#### § 115.105 Funds of deceased Indians of the Five Civilized Tribes.

Funds of a deceased Indian of the Five Civilized Tribes may be disbursed to pay ad valorem and personal property taxes, Federal and State estate and income taxes, obligations approved by the Secretary or his authorized representative prior to death of decedent, expenses of last sickness and burial and claims found to be just and reasonable which are not barred by the statute of limitations, costs of determining heirs to restricted property by the State courts, and claims allowed pursuant to part 16 of this chapter.
' J. 

gekuil, ,J. 

they are clearly erroneous or not supported by substantial evidence). 

Appellant's argument that the children's prior residency with her is 

sufficient ignores the statute's condition that the residency be current—

the 30-day period is not at issue here. The district court did not abuse its 

discretion in concluding that appellant did not meet the NRS 127.110(1) 

requirements. Id. 

AppellantS next argues that the district court failed to consider 

the familial preference in placing a child in an adoption. Appellant raises 

this issue for the first time on appeal. Accordingly, this issue is deemed to 

have been waived, and we will not consider it. Old Aztec Mine, Inc. v. 

Brown, 97 Nev. 49, 52, 623 P.2d 981, 983 (1981). 

Appellant lastly alleges several procedural deficiencies 

relating to a prior motion to adopt the children. That motion was filed in a 

different case, and appellant has not identified any authority permitting 

this court to review alleged procedural deficiencies relating to the denial of 

her motion in a prior action. See Edwards v. Emperor's Garden Rest., 122 

Nev. 317, 330 n.38, 130 P.M 1280, 1288 n.38 (2006). Accordingly, we 

ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED. 

Gibbons Pickering 

cc: Hon. Robert Teuton, District Judge, Family Court Division 

Cuthbert E.A. Mack 

Clark County District Attorney/Juvenile Division 

Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck, LLP/Las Vegas 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 2 

(0) 1947A
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsIce Crystal Icing Research at NASAIce crystals found at high altitude near convective clouds are known to cause jet engine power-loss events. These events occur due to ice crystals entering a propulsion system's core flowpath and accreting ice resulting in events such as uncommanded loss of thrust (rollback), engine stall, surge, and damage due to ice shedding. As part of a community with a growing need to understand the underlying physics of ice crystal icing, NASA has been performing experimental efforts aimed at providing datasets that can be used to generate models to predict the ice accretion inside current and future engine designs. Fundamental icing physics studies on particle impacts, accretion on a single airfoil, and ice accretions observed during a rollback event inside a full-scale engine in the Propulsion Systems Laboratory are summarized. Low fidelity code development using the results from the engine tests which identify key parameters for ice accretion risk and the development of high fidelity codes are described. These activities have been conducted internal to NASA and through collaboration efforts with industry, academia, and other government agencies. The details of the research activities and progress made to date in addressing ice crystal icing research challenges are discussed.Document ID20170011211Acquisition SourceGlenn Research CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsFlegel, Ashlie B.*(NASA Glenn Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)*Date AcquiredNovember 22, 2017Publication DateNovember 1, 2017Subject CategoryNumerical AnalysisAir Transportation And SafetyAerodynamicsReport/Patent NumberGRC-E-DAA-TN47321E-19431AIAA Paper 2017-4085NASA/TM-2017-219700Meeting InformationMeeting: AIAA Atmospheric and Space Environments ConferenceLocation: Denver, COCountry: United StatesStart Date: June 5, 2017End Date: June 9, 2017Sponsors:American Inst. of Aeronautics and AstronauticsFunding Number(s)WBS: WBS 081876.02.03.08.01.04Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.KeywordscrystaIcingAvailable DownloadsNameType20170011211.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
§ 1000.160 What is the purpose of this subpart? This subpart provides the process and timelines for negotiating a self-governance compact with the Department and an AFA with any bureau. ( a ) For a newly selected or currently participating Tribe/Consortium negotiating an initial AFA with any bureau, see §§ 1000.173 through 1000.179.
( b ) For a participating Tribe/Consortium negotiating a successor AFA with any bureau, see §§ 1000.180 through 1000.182.