alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §1612. Merit system principles and civil service protections: applicability

(a) Applicability of Merit System Principles.—Section 2301 of title 5 shall apply to the exercise of authority under this subchapter (other than sections 1605 and 1611).

(b) Civil Service Protections.—(1) If, in the case of a position established under authority other than section 1601(a)(1) of this title that is reestablished as an excepted service position under that section, the provisions of law referred to in paragraph (2) applied to the person serving in that position immediately before the position is so reestablished and such provisions of law would not otherwise apply to the person while serving in the position as so reestablished, then such provisions of law shall, subject to paragraph (3), continue to apply to the person with respect to service in that position for as long as the person continues to serve in the position without a break in service.

(2) The provisions of law referred to in paragraph (1) are the following provisions of title 5:

(A) Section 2302, relating to prohibited personnel practices.

(B) Chapter 75, relating to adverse actions.

(3)(A) Notwithstanding any provision of chapter 75 of title 5, an appeal of an adverse action by an individual employee covered by paragraph (1) shall be determined within the Department of Defense if the employee so elects.

(B) The Secretary of Defense shall prescribe the procedures for initiating and determining appeals of adverse actions pursuant to elections made under subparagraph (A).

(Added Pub. L. 104–201, div. A, title XVI, §1632(d), Sept. 23, 1996, 110 Stat. 2750.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Oct. 1, 1996, see section 1635 of Pub. L. 104–201, set out as an Effective Date of 1996 Amendment note under section 1593 of this title.
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > A Brief History of the National Banking System

              																	United States. Office of the Comptroller of the Currency. 						*A Brief History of the National Banking System*,										1938,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/848,			accessed on September 11, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
| **Accounts Receivable - Textual (Details)**                                          | Dec. 31, 2012 | Dec. 31, 2011 |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------|---------------|
| **Accounts Receivable (Textual) (Abstract)**                                         |          |          |
| Allowance for Doubtful Accounts as a Percentage of Total Patient Accounts Receivable | 11.00%        | 9.20%         |

| X                                                                                                                                                             |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - Details**Name:**hls_AccountsReceivableTextualAbstract**Namespace Prefix:**hls_**Data Type:**xbrli:stringItemType**Balance Type:**na**Period Type:**duration |
| X                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - Definition
Allowance for doubtful accounts expressed as a percentage of gross patient accounts receivable.
+ References
No definition available.
+ Details**Name:**hls_AllowanceForDoubtfulAccountsAsPercentageOfPatientAccountsReceivable**Namespace Prefix:**hls_**Data Type:**num:percentItemType**Balance Type:**na**Period Type:**instant |
### §8135. Regular Marine Corps: order of filling vacancies in grade of second lieutenant

Vacancies on the active-duty list of the Marine Corps in the grade of second lieutenant shall be filled, so far as practicable, first, from members of the graduating class of the Naval Academy; second, from meritorious noncommissioned officers of the Regular Marine Corps; and third, from other persons.

(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 324, §5585; Pub. L. 96–513, title V, §503(29), Dec. 12, 1980, 94 Stat. 2913; renumbered §8135, Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, §807(b)(4), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1834.)

| Revised section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 5585 | 34 U.S.C. 634. | Mar. 3, 1899, ch. 413, §19, 30 Stat. 1008; Mar. 3, 1903, ch. 1010, 32 Stat. 1198 (1st proviso in 5th par., 48th word to end of proviso). |

The words "from other persons" are substituted for the words "from civil life" because 34 U.S.C. 1020e authorizes the appointment of graduates of the NROTC program as well as of other persons in civil life. Such graduates are, properly, persons in "civil life", since they are members of the Naval Reserve who are not on active duty. However, since the status of members of the NROTC is not always clear, the statement of the class is expanded.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–232 renumbered section 5585 of this title as this section.

1980—Pub. L. 96–513 substituted "active-duty list" for "active list".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2018 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 115–232 effective Feb. 1, 2019, with provision for the coordination of amendments and special rule for certain redesignations, see section 800 of Pub. L. 115–232, set out as a note preceding section 3001 of this title.

#### Effective Date of 1980 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 96–513 effective Sept. 15, 1981, see section 701 of Pub. L. 96–513, set out as a note under section 101 of this title.
### **CHAPTER 322—MAJOR SYSTEMS AND MAJOR DEFENSE ACQUISITION PROGRAMS GENERALLY**

Subchapter
Sec.
I.
Management
4211
II.
Contracting
4231
III.
Milestones for Major Defense Acquisition Programs
4251
IV.
Additional Provisions Applicable Specifically to Major Defense Acquisition Programs
4271
V.
Contractors
4291

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

Pub. L. 117–81, div. A, title XVII, §1701(b)(16)(A), Dec. 27, 2021, 135 Stat. 2134, amended Pub. L. 116–283, div. A, title XVIII, §1847(a), Jan. 1, 2021, 134 Stat. 4252, which added this analysis, by adding item for subchapter V and striking out a second item for subchapter III "Contractors".
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

June 28, 2004

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 03-41226

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

PEDRO ZARCO FLORES,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. C-03-CR-73-1

--------------------

Before JOLLY, WIENER, and PICKERING, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Pedro Zarco Flores (“Flores”) appeals his guilty-plea

conviction and sentence for possession of more than five

kilograms of cocaine with intent to distribute, a violation of

21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) and (b)(1). 

Flores contends that the district court clearly erred in

denying him a “safety valve” departure under U.S.S.G. § 5C1.2. 

Although the basic outline of Flores’s story of how he obtained

the truck that was used to deliver 5.58 kilograms of marijuana
No. 03-41226 

-2-

appears believable, his answers to some of the district court’s

specific questions about this matter suggests that he was

not being entirely forthcoming about his role in the offense. 

After reviewing the record, we conclude that the district court

did not clearly err in determining that Flores’s testimony about

his role in the offense was not fully credible or “truthful.” 

See U.S.S.G. § 5C1.2(a)(5) (Nov. 2002); United States v.

Ridgeway, 321 F.3d 512, 516 (5th Cir. 2003). 

For the first time on appeal, Flores maintains that the

sentencing scheme of 21 U.S.C. § 841 is facially unconstitutional

in light of Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 490 (2000). 

As Flores concedes, his argument is foreclosed by this court’s

decision in United States v. Slaughter, 238 F.3d 580, 582

(5th Cir. 2000). Flores raises the issue only to preserve it for

possible further review. 

The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
#### Edgar Preston v. The State.

No. 22767.

Delivered February 16, 1944.

*26The opinion states the case.

*Roy A. Scott,*of Corpus Christi for appellant.

*Ernest S. Goens,*State’s Attorney, of Austin, for the State.

BEAUCHAMP, .Judge.

Appellant was assessed a fine of One Thousand Dollars and two years in. county jail from which he appeals.

He was charged by complaint with making an unlawful, aggravated assault on Joan Howell, a girl nine years of age. It will not be necessary to state the facts of the case in order to dispose of the questions involved other than that State’s evidence showed that he fondled the person of this child in a manner sufficient to support a conviction. After the appellant had rested his case, the State recalled the prosecuting witness and déveloped from her that the appellant had on several occasions prior thereto, exposed himself and engaged in conduct in her presence which showed him to be a moral pervert. This evidence went before the jury over objections and in so admitting this testimony the court committed error.

Appellant has presented qúite a lengthy brief on this subject in which he has assigned a number of errors. We are not discussing these assignments because this court, under the rules, is not concerned with assignments of error, but with the question presented by the bill of exceptions itself. Counsel may simplify his own work and aid this court materially by discussing the bills as they are found'in the record, without the burdensome formalities frequently found in such briefs.

It is sufficient to say that when a party is on trial for an offense it is not permissible to introduce before the jury evidence of disconnected crimes, immoral conduct and general reputation of the party which would show him to be a bad character generally. Only such matters as may enlighten the jury on the questions before them should be admitted. The immediate question was • specifically treated by this court in Kennedy *27v. State, 152 S. W. (2d) 772. See also White v. State, 131 S. W. (2d) 968 for the distinguishment to be made between that which is admissible and that which is not.

Bill of Exception No. Three brings forward a remark by the court in .the presence of the jury which constitutes a comment on the weight of the evidence of the witness, John Howell. This comment was an error which could hardly be removed from the jury’s mind by the apology given to them by the court. However, it will probably not occur on the trial of another case and for that reason is not treated.

For the error pointed out, the judgment of the trial court is reversed and the cause remanded.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Graham Packaging Holdings Company on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Warren D. Knowlton, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|   | 1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Graham Packaging Holdings Company. |
|--------|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

Date: May 15, 2007

 

 

| By:    | /s/ Warren D. Knowlton  |
|--------|-------------------------|
|   | Warren D. Knowlton      |
|   | Chief Executive Officer |

 

 

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
In accordance with 14 CFR 11, Cessna Aircraft Company is requesting an exemption from the requirements of 14 CFR 91.409 (a) and (b) to allow the published Inspection Document Program (reference 208/208B Aircraft Maintenance Manual, Revision 24 or later) to be accepted as an
inspection program recommended by the manufacturer (reference 14 CFR 91. 409 (f) (3) ) . The 208/208B Inspection Document task based inspection p rogram was developed from the 208/208B Phasecard Inspection Program that was accepted b y the FAA as “a manufacturers approved inspection program.” on October 24, 1990. This exemption would allow operators to
select a manufacturer recommended program that is task based and integrated into the 208/208B published In structi ons for Continued Airworthiness.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998             DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998             MAR-28-1999
<CASH>                                               0                       0
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0                       0
<PP&E>                                               0                       0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0                       0
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                             0                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0                       0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0                       0
<SALES>                                              0                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0                       0
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0                       0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0                       0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0                       0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0                       0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0                       0
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 401 Agreed to House (ATH)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 401

 Providing for a committee to notify the President of the assembly of 
                             the Congress.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 27, 2000

Mr. Armey submitted the following resolution; which was considered and 
                               agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Providing for a committee to notify the President of the assembly of 
                             the Congress.

    Resolved, That a committee of two Members be appointed by the 
Speaker on the part of the House of Representatives to join with a 
committee on the part of the Senate to notify the President of the 
United States that a quorum of each House has assembled and Congress is 
ready to receive any communication that he may be pleased to make.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of OMI Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Craig
H. Stevenson, Jr., Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

| | 1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements
of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                              
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | 2) | The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
of the Company.
|

|      |                         |  |     |                               
|----- | ----------------------- |  | --- | ------------------------------
|      |                         |  |     |                               
|      |                         |  |     |                               
|      |                         |  |     |                               
|Date: | May
            9, 2006 |  | By: | /s/Craig
    H. Stevenson, Jr.
|      |                         |  |     | Craig H. Stevenson, Jr.       
|      |                         |  |     | Chairman of the Board and     
|      |                         |  |     | Chief Executive Officer       







A signed original of this statement required by Section 906 has been provided to OMI Corporation and will be retained by OMI Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its Staff upon
      request.

---
§ 166.704 What will a written notice of a permit violation contain? The written notice of a permit violation will provide the permittee with ten days from the receipt of the written notice to: ( a ) Cure the permit violation and notify us that the violation is cured.
( b ) Explain why we should not cancel the permit; or
( c ) Request in writing additional time to complete corrective actions. If additional time is granted, we may require that certain corrective actions be taken immediately.
#### § 2.301 When is a decision a final agency action?

An agency decision that is not subject to administrative appeal is a final agency action and immediately effective when issued unless the decision provides otherwise.
### Pre-Quaternary rocks in the Sun River Canyon area, northwestern Montana

By: Melville Rhodes Mudge

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/pp663A

#### Links

- More information:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**                            (html)
-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 3**                            (pdf) 
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.