alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Order entered January 22, 2021

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05
- 20
- 01004
- CV ALEJANDRO VASQUEZ D/B/A DANI’ S CONCRETE, Appellant V. KAPSEN DEVELOPMENT GROUP, LLC, Ap pellee On Appeal from the 68th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC
- 20
- 07342

ORDER Before the Court is appellant’s January 21, 2021 motion for an extension of time to file his letter brief in response to this Court’s Dec ember 28, 2020 letter questioning our jurisdiction over this appeal. We GRANT the motion and extend the time to February 5, 2021

.
/s/ KEN MOLBERG JUSTICE
EXHIBIT 32. - Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.


                    CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Australian-Canadian
Oil Royalties Ltd. (the "Company") for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2007,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), Andre Sakhai, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
and Bernard Lipton, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of their knowledge, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.


Dated: August 16, 2007                  /S/ ANDRE SAKHAI
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Andre Sakhai, President and
                                        Chief Executive Officer



Dated: August 16, 2007                  /S/ BERNARD LIPTON
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Bernard Lipton, Chief Financial Officer



This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
§ 117.28 Payment of claims against estates. The superintendent may disburse to the executor or administrator of the estate of a deceased Indian of one-half or more Indian blood who did not have a certificate of competency at the time of his death sufficient funds out of the estate to pay the following classes of claims approved by the court: ( a ) Debts authorized by the superintendent during the lifetime of the Indian.
( b ) Expenses incurred pending the qualifications of an executor or administrator under authority contained in § 117.26.
( c ) Expenses of administration, including court costs, premium on bond of executor or administrator, transcript fees and appraiser fees.
( d ) Living expenses incurred within 90 days immediately preceding the date of death of the Indian.
( e ) Allowance for reasonable living expenses each month for 12 months to a surviving spouse who is entitled to participate in the distribution of the estate and who is in need of such support.
( f ) Allowance for reasonable living expenses each month for 12 months for each child of the decedent under 21 years of age who is entitled to participate in the distribution of the estate and who is in need of such support.
( g ) Insurance premiums and license fees on restricted property.
( h ) Not to exceed $1,000 for the preservation and upkeep of restricted property including the services of a caretaker when necessary.
( i ) Debts incurred during the lifetime of the Indian but not authorized by the superintendent, if found by the Commissioner to be just and payable. The superintendent shall disburse no funds to an executor or administrator for the payment of the foregoing classes of claims unless the executor or administrator has no other funds in his hands available for the payment of such claims.
[22 FR 10554, Dec. 24, 1957, as amended at 35 FR 10005, June 18, 1970. Redesignated at 47 FR 13327, Mar. 30, 1982]
### §2350e. NATO Airborne Warning and Control System (AWACS) program: authority of Secretary of Defense

(a) Authority Under AWACS Program.—The Secretary of Defense, in carrying out an AWACS memorandum of understanding, may do the following:

(1) Waive reimbursement for the cost of the following functions performed by personnel other than personnel employed in the United States Air Force Airborne Warning and Control System (AWACS) program office:

(A) Auditing.

(B) Quality assurance.

(C) Codification.

(D) Inspection.

(E) Contract administration.

(F) Acceptance testing.

(G) Certification services.

(H) Planning, programming, and management services.

(2) Waive any surcharge for administrative services otherwise chargeable.

(3) In connection with that Program, assume contingent liability for—

(A) program losses resulting from the gross negligence of any contracting officer of the United States;

(B) identifiable taxes, customs duties, and other charges levied within the United States on the program; and

(C) the United States share of the unfunded termination liability.

(b) Contract Authority Limitation.—Authority under this section to enter into contracts shall be effective for any fiscal year only to such extent or in such amounts as are provided in appropriation Acts.

(c) Definition.—In this section, the term "AWACS memorandum of understanding" means—

(1) the Multilateral Memorandum of Understanding Between the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) Ministers of Defence on the NATO E–3A Cooperative Programme, signed by the Secretary of Defense on December 6, 1978;

(2) the Memorandum of Understanding for Operations and Support of the NATO Airborne Early Warning and Control Force, signed by the United States Ambassador to NATO on September 26, 1984;

(3) the Addendum to the Multilateral Memorandum of Understanding Between the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) Ministers of Defence on the NATO E–3A Cooperative Programme (dated December 6, 1978) relating to the modernization of the NATO Airborne Early Warning and Control (NAEW&C) System, dated December 7, 1990; and

(4) any other follow-on support agreement for the NATO E–3A Cooperative Programme.

(Added Pub. L. 101–189, div. A, title IX, §932(a)(1), Nov. 29, 1989, 103 Stat. 1536; amended Pub. L. 102–190, div. A, title X, §1051, Dec. 5, 1991, 105 Stat. 1470; Pub. L. 103–160, div. A, title XIV, §1413, Nov. 30, 1993, 107 Stat. 1829.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

Provisions similar to those in this section were contained in Pub. L. 97–86, title I, §103, Dec. 1, 1981, 95 Stat. 1100, as amended, which was set out as a note under section 2407 of this title, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 101–189, §932(b).

#### Amendments

1993—Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 103–160 struck out subsec. (d) which read as follows: "Expiration.—The authority provided by this section expires on September 30, 1993."

1991—Subsec. (c)(3), (4). Pub. L. 102–190, §1051(1), added par. (3) and redesignated former par. (3) as (4).

Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 102–190, §1051(2), substituted "1993" for "1991".
# EUR-Lex - 52013PC0818 - EN

*|*

# 52013PC0818

**ANNEX to the Proposal for a COUNCIL REGULATION (EU) N° [..]/2013 fixing for 2014 the fishing opportunities for certain fish stocks and groups of fish stocks applicable in the Black Sea /* COM/2013/0818 final */**

			*

			*

ANNEX

to the

Proposal for a COUNCIL REGULATION
(EU) N° [..]/2013

fixing for 2014 the fishing
opportunities for certain fish stocks and groups of fish stocks applicable in
the Black Sea

Catch
limits

The following tables set out the quotas (in
tonnes live weight, except where otherwise specified) by stock, and conditions functionally
linked thereto, where appropriate.

Fish stocks are referred to following the
alphabetical order of the Latin names of the species. For the purposes of this
Regulation, the following comparative table of Latin names and common names is provided:

Scientific name || Alpha-3 code || Common name

Psetta maxima || TUR || Turbot

Sprattus sprattus || SPR || Sprat

|| || || ||

Species: || Turbot || Zone: || EU waters in the Black Sea ||

|| Psetta maxima || || TUR/F37.4.2.C. || || || ||

Bulgaria || 37 || || Analytical TAC Article 3 of Regulation (EC) No 847/96 shall not apply. Article 4 of Regulation (EC) No 847/96 shall not apply. ||

Romania || 37 || ||

|| || ||

EU || 74 || (1) ||

|| || ||

TAC || Not relevant ||

_________ || || ||

(1)          No fishing activity, including transhipment, taking on board, landing and first sale shall be permitted from 15 April to 15 June 2014 ||

Species: || Sprat || || Zone: || EU waters in the Black Sea || ||

|| Sprattus sprattus || || SPR/F37.4.2.C ||

Bulgaria || 8032.5 || || Analytical TAC Article 3 of Regulation (EC) No 847/96 shall not apply. Article 4 of Regulation (EC) No 847/96 shall not apply. ||

Romania || 3442.5 || ||

|| || ||

EU || 11475 || ||

|| || ||

TAC || Not relevant || ||

|| || || ||
US DeDartment Transport Airplane Directorate u.b. ueparrmenT 1601 Ljnd Avenue

of Transportation Renton, Washington 98057-3356

Federal Aviation

Administrator!

March 29, 2012

Rafael Gustavo Fassina Marques

Airworthiness Office

Embraer S.A.

Av. Brigadeiro Faria Lima, 2.170

12227-901 SJ. dos Campos SP

Brasil

Dear Mr. Marques:

We have received your March 9,2012 petition (letter no. GCF-173/2012), on behalf of

Embraer S.A., requesting an exemption from 25.809(a) of Title 14, Code of Federal

Regulations (14 CFR). This exemption, if granted, would permit relief from the overwing

emergency exit requirements the wing and ground from the unopened exit on Embraer

Model EMB-550 airplanes.

Your petition has been added to public docket no. FAA-2012-0302 and is being processed.

Please re-petition to adequately address the Public Interest statement requirement of 14 CFR

11.81(d):

The reasons why granting your request would be in the public interest; that is, how it

would benefit the public as a whole.

If you have questions in the meantime, you may call Jayson Claar at (425) 227-2194, e-mail

jayson.claar@faa.gov.

Sincerely,

Franklin Tiangsing

Standardization Branch

Transport Airplane Directorate

Federal Aviation Administration
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 3 (Thursday, January 5, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 472]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-33823]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


National Advisory Committee for Implementation of the National 
Forest System Land Management Planning Rule; Correction

AGENCY: USDA Forest Service.

ACTION: Notice; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Forest Service published a notice in the Federal Register 
on December 29, 2011, concerning the intent to establish an advisory 
committee and call for nominations. The document contained incorrect 
dates. The published document contained a due date for nominations of 
February 13, 2012. The correction is February 21, 2012.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tony Tooke, U.S. Department of 
Agriculture, Forest Service, National Forest System, Ecosystem 
Management Coordination; telephone: (202) 205-0830, fax: (202) 205-
1758, or email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#4531312a2a2e200523366b2320216b3036"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="6511110a0a0e002503164b0300014b1016">[email protected]</span></a>. Individuals who use telecommunication 
devices for the deaf (TDD) may call the Federal Information Relay 
Service (FIRS) at 1 (800) 877-8339 between 8 a.m. and 8 p.m., Eastern 
Standard Time, Monday through Friday.

Correction

    In the Federal Register of December 29, 2011, in FR doc. 2011-
33535, on page 81911, in the first column, correct the ``Dates'' 
caption to read:
    Written nominations must be received by February 21, 2012. 
Nominations must contain a completed application packet that includes 
the nominee's name, resume, and completed form AD-755 (Advisory 
Committee Membership Background Information). The form AD-755 may be 
obtained from Forest Service contact person or from the following Web 
site: http://www.fs.usda.gov/Internet/FSE_DOCUMENTS/stelprdb5203568.pdf . The package must be sent to the address below.

    Dated: December 30, 2011.
Pearlie S. Reed,
Assistant Secretary of Administration.
[FR Doc. 2011-33823 Filed 1-4-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
IV

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 109

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that a commemorative

postage stamp should be issued recognizing the 4–H Youth Development

Program’s centennial.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 11, 1999

Mr. FOLEY submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on Government Reform

RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that

a commemorative postage stamp should be issued recognizing the 4–H Youth Development Program’s centennial.

Whereas the 4–H Youth Development Program celebrates its

100th anniversary in 2002;

Whereas the 4–H Youth Development Program has grown to

over 5.6 million annual participants, from 5 to 19 years

of age;

Whereas today’s 4–H Club is very diverse, offering agricultural, career development, information technology, and

general life skills programs;

Whereas these programs are offered in rural and urban areas

throughout the world; and
2

•HRES 109 IH

Whereas the 4–H Youth Development Program continues to

make great contributions toward the development of wellrounded youth: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Rep2 resentatives that—

3 (1) the United States Postal Service should

4 make preparations to issue a commemorative post5 age stamp recognizing the 4–H Youth Development

6 Program’s centennial; and

7 (2) the Citizens’ Stamp Advisory Committee

8 should recommend to the Postmaster General that

9 such a postage stamp be issued in 2002.

Æ
#### Edgar J. Stachelberg, as Executor, etc., Appellant, v. Linda Stachelberg, Individually, etc., Respondent, Impleaded with Charles G. Stachelberg, Appellant, and Others.

Motion granted an,d question certified as stated in order.
### §2868. Utility services: furnishing for certain buildings

Appropriations for the Department of Defense may be used for utility services for buildings constructed at private cost, as authorized by law.

(Added Pub. L. 100–370, §1(j)(1), July 19, 1988, 102 Stat. 848, §2490; renumbered §2868, Pub. L. 105–85, div. A, title III, §371(b)(2), Nov. 18, 1997, 111 Stat. 1705; amended Pub. L. 108–375, div. A, title VI, §651(e)(2), Oct. 28, 2004, 118 Stat. 1972.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Section is based on Pub. L. 99–190, §101(b) [title VIII, §8006(b)], Dec. 19, 1985, 99 Stat. 1185.

In two instances, the source section for provisions to be codified provides that defense appropriations may be used for "welfare and recreation" or "welfare and recreational" purposes. (Section 735 of Public Law 98–212 and section 8006(b) of Public Law 99–190, to be codified as 10 U.S.C. 2241(a)(1) and 2490(2), respectively). The committee added the term "morale" in both of these two instances to conform to the usual "MWR" usage for morale, welfare, and recreation activities.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2004—Pub. L. 108–375 substituted "for buildings constructed at private cost, as authorized by law." for "for—

"(1) buildings constructed at private cost, as authorized by law; and

"(2) buildings on military reservations authorized by regulation to be used for morale, welfare, and recreational purposes."

1997—Pub. L. 105–85 renumbered section 2490 of this title as this section.
#### Harris H. Uris v. Brackett Realty Company.

Motion denied, with ten dollars costs.
# C_2013155EN.01000101.xml

| 1.6.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 155/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.6.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 155/1

---

Notice for the attention of the persons and entities to which restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2013/255/CFSP and Council Regulation (EU) No 36/2012 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Syria apply

2013/C 155/01

The following information is brought to the attention of the persons and entities that appear in Annexes I and II to Council Decision 2013/255/CFSP (1) and in Annexes II and IIa to Council Regulation (EU) No 36/2012 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Syria.

1

The Council of the European Union has decided that the persons and entities appearing in those Annexes should be subject to the restrictive measures provided for under that Council Decision and Council Regulation. The grounds for listing of those persons and entities appear in the relevant entries in those Annexes.

The attention of the persons and entities concerned is drawn to the possibility of making an application to the competent authorities of the relevant Member State(s) as indicated on the websites in Annex III to Regulation (EU) No 36/2012, in order to obtain an authorisation to use frozen funds for basic needs or specific payments (cf. Article 16 of the Regulation).

For the purpose of the Council's next review of the list of persons and entities subject to the restrictive measures, the persons and entities concerned may submit a request to the Council before 28 February 2014, together with supporting documentation, that the decision to include them on the said list should be reconsidered, to the following address:

| Council of the European Union |
| --- |
| General Secretariat |
| DG C — Unit 1C (Horizontal Issues) |
| Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175 |
| 1048 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

Council of the European Union

General Secretariat

DG C — Unit 1C (Horizontal Issues)

Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175

1048 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

The attention of the persons and entities concerned is also drawn to the possibility of challenging the Council's decision before the General Court of the European Union, in accordance with the conditions laid down in Article 275, second paragraph, and Article 263, fourth and sixth paragraphs, of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.

---

(1)  OJ L 147, 1.6.2013, p. 14.

1

---
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **CMBS Department**

 

MAC N9401-011

1055 10th Avenue SE

Minneapolis, MN 55414 |
|--------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

Morgan Stanley Capital I Inc. 

1585 BROADWAY

NEW YORK, New York 10036-8200

 

RE: Annual Statement of Compliancefor Morgan Stanley Capital I Inc., Commercial Mortgage Pass-ThroughCertificates, Series 2012-C4

 

Per the Pooling and ServicingAgreement dated as of March 1, 2012 (the “Agreement”), theundersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Custodian(“Wells Fargo”), hereby certifies as follows as of and for the yearending December 31, 2016 (the “Reporting Period”):

 

(a) A review of WellsFargo’s activities during the Reporting Period and of its performanceunder the Agreement has been made under such officer’s supervision; and

 

(b) To the best of suchofficer’s knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled allof its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout theReporting Period.

 

 

February 27, 2017

 

/s/ Gail Vannest

GAIL VANNEST

Vice President

 

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
§ 162.458 What are the consent requirements for a leasehold mortgage of a business lease? ( a ) Unless the lease provides otherwise, the lessee must notify all Indian landowners of the proposed leasehold mortgage.
( b ) The Indian landowners, or their representatives under § 162.013, must consent to a leasehold mortgage of a business lease in the same percentages and manner as a new business lease under § 162.012, unless the lease: ( 1 ) States that landowner consent is not required for a leasehold mortgage and identifies what law would apply in case of foreclosure;
( 2 ) Provides that individual Indian landowners are deemed to have consented where they do not object in writing to the leasehold mortgage within a specified period of time following the landowners' receipt of the leasehold mortgage and the lease meets the requirements of paragraph (c) of this section;
( 3 ) Authorizes one or more representatives to consent to a leasehold mortgage on behalf of all Indian landowners; or
( 4 ) Designates us as the Indian landowners' representative for the purposes of consenting to a leasehold mortgage.
( c ) If the lease provides for deemed consent under paragraph (b)(2) of this section, it must require the parties to submit to us: ( 1 ) A copy of the executed leasehold mortgage or other documentation of any Indian landowners' actual consent;
( 2 ) Proof of mailing of the leasehold mortgage to any Indian landowners who are deemed to have consented; and
( 3 ) Any other pertinent information for us to review.
§ 170.102 What goals and principles guide program implementation? When undertaking transportation activities affecting Tribes, the Secretaries should, to the maximum extent permitted by law: ( a ) Establish regular and meaningful consultation and collaboration with affected Tribal governments, including facilitating the direct involvement of Tribal governments in short- and long-range Federal transportation planning efforts;
( b ) Promote the rights of Tribal governments to govern their own internal affairs;
( c ) Promote the rights of Tribal governments to receive direct transportation services from the Federal Government or to enter into agreements to directly operate any Tribally related transportation programs serving Tribal members;
( d ) Ensure the continuation of the trust responsibility of the United States to Tribes and Indian individuals;
( e ) Reduce the imposition of unfunded mandates upon Tribal governments;
( f ) Encourage flexibility, innovation and implementation of contracting mechanisms used for delivery of the TTP to the greatest extent authorized by Congress by providing the protections afforded by the ISDEAA to Tribes carrying out eligible activities of the TTP;
( g ) Reduce, streamline, and eliminate unnecessarily restrictive transportation policies, guidelines, or procedures;
( h ) Ensure that Tribal rights and interests are appropriately considered during program development;
( i ) Ensure that the TTP is implemented consistent with Tribal sovereignty and the government-to-government relationship; and
( j ) Consult with, and solicit the participation of, Tribes in the development of the annual BIA budget proposals.