alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
knwn_ex101.htm

EXHIBIT 10.1
  
 AMENDMENT NO. 6 TO
 10% CONVERTIBLE REDEEMABLE NOTE
 DATED SEPTEMBER 30, 2016
  
 This AMENDMENT NO. 6 TO 10% REDEEMABLE nOTE dated SEPTEMBER 30, 2016 (this “Amendment”) is made and entered into as of November 8, 2021, by and between Clayton A. Struve (the “Holder”) and Know Labs, Inc., a Nevada corporation f/k/a Visualant, Incorporated (the “Company”).
  
 WHEREAS, the Company is a party to that certain 10% Convertible Redeemable Note dated September 30, 2016, as amended by Amendment No. 5 dated as of April 29, 2021 (as so amended, the “Note”) payable to Holder (capitalized terms used herein and not otherwise defined shall have the meanings set forth in the Note); 
  
 WHEREAS, the Note currently has a Maturity Date of September 30, 2021; and
  
 WHEREAS, the Holder and the Company wish to amend the Note to extend the Maturity Date;
  
 NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants, agreements, representations, and warranties contained herein, and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereby agree as follows.
  
 1. Amendment of Maturity Date. The Maturity Date of the Note is hereby amended to March 31, 2022.
  
 2. No Other Changes. Except as specifically set forth in this Amendment, the terms of the Note remain in full force and effect. 
  
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment as of the date first above written.
  
 Company:
  
 KNOW LABS, INC.
  
 	 /s/ Ronald P. Erickson
	  


  
 By: Ronald P. Erickson 
 Its: Chairman
  
 Holder:
  
 	 /s/ Clayton A. Struve
	  


  
 Clayton A. Struve
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Avalon Holdings Corporation on Form 10-Q for the three month period ending March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Ronald E. Klingle, Chief Executive Officer of Avalon Holdings Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

and results of operations of Avalon Holdings Corporation.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Ronald E. Klingle  
|Ronald E. Klingle      
|Chief Executive Officer
|May 11, 2007
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsComparison of Theodorsen's Unsteady Aerodynamic Forces with Doublet Lattice Generalized Aerodynamic ForcesThis paper identifies the unsteady aerodynamic forces and moments for a typical section contained in the NACA Report No. 496, "General Theory of Aerodynamic Instability and the Mechanism of Flutter," by Theodore Theodorsen. These quantities are named Theodorsen's aerodynamic forces (TAFs). The TAFs are compared to the generalized aerodynamic forces (GAFs) for a very high aspect ratio wing (AR = 20) at zero Mach number computed by the doublet lattice method. Agreement between TAFs and GAFs is very-good-to-excellent. The paper also reveals that simple proportionality relationships that are known to exist between the real parts of some GAFs and the imaginary parts of others also hold for the real and imaginary parts of the corresponding TAFs.Document ID20170009599Acquisition SourceLangley Research CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsPerry, Boyd, III*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Date AcquiredOctober 6, 2017Publication DateSeptember 1, 2017Subject CategoryAerodynamicsReport/Patent NumberNASA/TM-2017-219667NF1676L-28080L-20873Funding Number(s)WBS: WBS 432938.11.01.07.43.40.08Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType20170009599.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News

USNS Mercy arrives in the Republic of Palau for Pacific Partnership 24-1December 21, 2023 — The hospital ship USNS Mercy (T-AH 19) arrived Dec. 21 in the Republic of Palau to begin the fourth mission stop of Pacific Partnership 24-1, the largest annual multinational humanitarian assistance and disaster relief preparedness mission conducted in the Indo-Pacific region... MORE 

----

Pacific Partnership 24-1 concludes first mission stop in the Republic of the Marshall IslandsNovember 14, 2023 — Multinational service members participating in Pacific Partnership 2024-1 (PP24-1) departed the Republic of the Marshall Islands aboard the hospital ship USNS Mercy (T-AH 19) Nov. 14 following a 14-day mission stop in the island nation... MORE 

----

2024 (325)2023 (825)2022 (1193)2021 (1066)2020 (1083)2019 (1166)2018 (1116)2017 (1356)2016 (1475)2015 (1408)2014 (904)2013 (32)2012 (4)

About DoDDoD CareersJoin the MilitaryNewsUSA.govPhotos & VideosPrivacy & SecurityTop Issues

US INDOPACOM Inspector GeneralDoD Inspector General Accessibility/Section 508DoD FOIAUS INDOPACOM FOIALink DisclaimerNo FEAR ActRecovery ActINDOPACOM Webmaster

                  - Facebook
                  - X
                  - YouTube
                  - Instagram
                  - RSS

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
§ 162.401 What types of leases does this subpart cover? ( a ) This subpart covers both ground leases (undeveloped land) and leases of developed land (together with the permanent improvements thereon) on Indian land that are not covered in another subpart of this part, including: ( 1 ) Leases for residential purposes that are not covered in subpart C;
( 2 ) Leases for business purposes that are not covered in subpart E;
( 3 ) Leases for religious, educational, recreational, cultural, or other public purposes; and
( 4 ) Commercial or industrial leases for retail, office, manufacturing, storage, biomass, waste-to-energy, or other business purposes.
( b ) Leases covered by this subpart may authorize the construction of single-purpose or mixed-use projects designed for use by any number of lessees or occupants.
# C_2013316EN.01000901.xml

| 30.10.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 316/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.10.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 316/9

---

Notice for the attention of the persons and entities to which the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2012/642/CFSP and in Council Regulation (EC) No 765/2006, as amended by Council Decision 2013/534/CFSP and implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1054/2013 concerning restrictive measures against Belarus apply

2013/C 316/05

The following information is brought to the attention of persons and entities that appear in the Annex to Council Decision 2012/642/CFSP, and in Annex I to Council Regulation (EC) No 765/2006, as amended by Council Decision 2013/534/CFSP (1) and implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1054/2013 (2) concerning restrictive measures against Belarus.

1

2

The Council of the European Union has decided that the persons and entities that appear in the above mentioned Annexes should continue to be included in the list of persons and entities subject to the restrictive measures provided for in Decision 2012/642/CFSP and in Regulation (EC) No 765/2006 concerning restrictive measures against Belarus. The grounds for designations of those persons and entities appear in the relevant entries in those Annexes.

The attention of the persons and entities concerned is drawn to the possibility of making an application to the competent authorities of the relevant Member State(s) as indicated in the websites in Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 765/2006, in order to obtain an authorisation to use frozen funds for basic needs or specific payments (cf. Article 3 of the Regulation).

The persons and entities concerned may submit a request to the Council, together with supporting documentation, that the decision to include them on the above mentioned list should be reconsidered, to the following address:

| Council of the European Union |
| --- |
| General Secretariat |
| DG C — Unit 1C (Horizontal Issues) |
| Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175 |
| 1048 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

Council of the European Union

General Secretariat

DG C — Unit 1C (Horizontal Issues)

Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175

1048 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

The attention of the persons and entities concerned is also drawn to the possibility of challenging the Council's decision before the General Court of the European Union, in accordance with the conditions laid down in Article 275, second paragraph, and Article 263, fourth and sixth paragraphs, of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.

---

(1)  OJ L 288, 30.10.2013, p. 69.

1

(2)  OJ L 288, 30.10.2013, p. 1.

2

---
### SUBCHAPTER IV—TRIAL PROCEDURE

Sec.
949a.
Rules.
949b.
Unlawfully influencing action of military commission and United States Court of Military Commission Review.
949c.
Duties of trial counsel and defense counsel.
949d.
Sessions.
949e.
Continuances.
949f.
Challenges.
949g.
Oaths.
949h.
Former jeopardy.
949i.
Pleas of the accused.
949j.
Opportunity to obtain witnesses and other evidence.
949k.
Defense of lack of mental responsibility.
949 l.
Voting and rulings.
949m.
Number of votes required.
949n.
Military commission to announce action.
949 o.
Record of trial.
#### Waterford Electric Light, Heat and Power Company v. Kate E. Reed and Others.

—Motion denied.
§ 168.6 Grazing on range units authorized by permit. Grazing use on range units is authorized only by permits granted under paragraph (a) or (b) of this section. ( a ) *Grazing permits to Hopi tribal members on their partitioned lands.* The Area Director shall assign grazing privileges to the Hopi Tribe for lands within Hopi Partitioned Lands. The tribal government will then allocate use to their tribal members for permit periods not to exceed five years. Grazing use by Hopi tribal enterprises may be authorized. The Area Director will issue permits based on the determination of the Hopi tribal government.
( b ) *Interim Grazing Permit for persons awaiting relocation.* Navajo Tribal members who have maintained both a permanent residence on Hopi Partitioned lands; a livestock inventory since enumeration; and meet all the criteria listed in § 168.1(o), shall be eligible for an interim grazing allocation on Hopi Partitioned Lands under the following terms and conditions: ( 1 ) The Area Director shall first verify that an applicant meets the criteria of the definition in § 168.1(o) and will issue all permits.
( 2 ) The permitted number shall not exceed either (i) 10 SUYL (See § 168.1(1)) for each eligible family member, or (ii) the grazing applicant's livestock inventory reduced by voluntary sales as adjusted by reproduction, in accordance with procedures developed by the Project Officer based upon the study by Stubblefield and Camfield, 1975 page 5. The determination of the person to whom permits will be issued and the number of livestock to be permitted will be based on information provided by the permit applicant and an assessment of the number of dependents residing in the immediate household.
( 3 ) The permit shall authorize grazing for a specific number and kind of animal(s) in a specified range unit. Interim grazing permits will not be issued in excess of one-half the authorized carrying capacity of the Hopi Partition area.
( 4 ) Subject to the provisions of § 168.9(b), permits shall expire when the person awaiting relocation is relocated pursuant to the Settlement Act. No interim permit will be issued for a term greater than one year. Permits may be reissued upon application and redetermination of eligibility. All interim permits will expire at the end of the period provided for completion of relocation, Pub. L. 99-190. When a Navajo permit holder discontinues grazing livestock or reduces the number being grazed whether by reason of his relocating or for any other reason, his grazing permit will be cancelled or reduced and no permit will be issued in lieu thereof. The total number of authorized animal units grazed by the Navajo permit holders awaiting relocation will reduced by the number of animal units authorized under the cancelled or reduced permit.
[47 FR 39817, Sept. 10, 1982, as amended at 51 FR 23052, June 25, 1986]
## Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Michael John Brumley , Appellant

No. 06

- 22

- 00093

- CR v.

The State of Texas , Appellee Appeal from the County Court of Burleson County, Texas (Tr. Ct

. No. 24,604 ). Memorandum Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Morriss

, Justice Stevens and Justice van Cleef participating

.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find reversible error in the judgment of

the court below. Therefore, we reverse the trial court ’ s judgment con victing Brumley of the Class A misdemeanor offense of operating a motor ve hicle while intoxica ted. W e remand the

cause to the trial court wi th instructions to reform the judgment of conviction to reflect a

conviction of the Class B misdemeanor offense of operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated and to conduct a new punishment hearing attendant to the post

- r eformation conviction.

We note that the appell ee , The State of Texas, pay all costs of this appeal.

RENDERED DECEMBER 20, 2022 BY ORDER OF THE COURT JOSH R. MORRISS, III CHIEF JU STICE

ATTEST: Debra K. Autrey , Clerk
#### § 141.16 Price marking.

The price of each article offered for sale shall be marked on the article, its containers or in any other manner that is plain and visible to the customer and that affords the customer a reasonable opportunity to learn the price of the article prior to purchase.
ineffective was itself procedurally barred. Hathaway v. State, 119 Nev. 

248, 252-53, 71 P.3d 503, 506 (2003). Further, appellant's reliance upon 

Martinez was misplaced as Martinez relates to federal procedural bars and 

not state procedural bars. Also, we note that Martinez involves ineffective 

assistance of post-conviction counsel and not ineffective assistance of trial 

counsel. Therefore, the district court did not err in denying this claim. 

Next, appellant claimed that Missouri v. Frye, 566 U.S. 

132 S. Ct. 1399 (2012), provided good cause because trial counsel was 

ineffective in advising him to accept a plea offer from the State. 

Appellant's good-cause argument was without merit because this claim 

was always available and he failed to demonstrate why he waited nearly 

three years to raise it. Further, his case was final when Frye was decided, 

and he failed to demonstrate that the case would apply retroactively to 

him. Even if Frye announced new rules of constitutional law, he failed to 

allege that he met either exception to the general principle that such rules 

do not apply retroactively to cases which were already final when the new 

rules were announced. See Colwell v. State, 118 Nev. 807, 816-17, 59 P.3d 

463, 469-70 (2002). Therefore, the district court did not err in denying this 

claim. 

Finally, appellant claimed that new evidence demonstrated 

that he was actually innocent of burglary. Appellant did not demonstrate 

actual innocence because he failed to show that "it is more likely than not 

that no reasonable juror would have convicted him in light of. . . new 

evidence." Calderon v. Thompson, 523 U.S. 538, 559 (1998) (quoting 

Schlup v. Delo, 513 U.S. 298, 327 (1995)); see also Pellegrini v. State, 117 

Nev. 860, 887, 34 P.3d 519, 537 (2001); Mazzan v. Warden, 112 Nev. 838, 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

(0) 1947A 

2 
J. 

842, 921 P.2d 920, 922 (1996). We therefore conclude that the district 

court did not err in denying appellant's petition, and we 

ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED. 2 

Hardesty 

Parraguirre 

J. 

J. 

cc: Hon. Jennifer P. Togliatti, District Judge 

John Lee Rush 

Attorney General/Carson City 

Clark County District Attorney 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

2We have reviewed all documents that appellant has submitted in 

proper person to the clerk of this court in this matter, and we conclude 

that no relief based upon those submissions is warranted. To the extent 

that appellant has attempted to present claims or facts in those 

submissions which were not previously presented in the proceedings 

below, we have declined to consider them in the first instance. 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

(0) 1947A 49ge 

3 

II
#### § 169.401 What is the purpose and scope of this subpart?

This subpart describes the procedures we use to address compliance and enforcement related to rights-of-way on Indian land. Any abandonment, non-use, or violation of the right-of-way grant or right-of-way document, including but not limited to encroachments beyond the defined boundaries, accidental, willful, and/or incidental trespass, unauthorized new construction, changes in use not permitted in the grant, and late or insufficient payment may result in enforcement actions including, but not limited to, cancellation of the grant.
### §7345. Restoration to former grade: retired warrant officers and enlisted members

Each retired warrant officer or enlisted member of the Army who has been advanced on the retired list to a higher commissioned grade under section 7344 of this title, and who applies to the Secretary of the Army within three months after his advancement, shall, if the Secretary approves, be restored on the retired list to his former warrant officer or enlisted status, as the case may be.

(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 231, §3965; Pub. L. 100–180, div. A, title V, §512(d)(1), Dec. 4, 1987, 101 Stat. 1090; Pub. L. 100–456, div. A, title XII, §1233(i)(1)(A), Sept. 29, 1988, 102 Stat. 2058; renumbered §7345 and amended Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, §§808(b)(13), 809(a), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1839, 1840.)

| Revised section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 3965 | 10:1006. | June 29, 1948, ch. 708, §204, 62 Stat. 1086. |

The words "hereafter", "rank or", and "shall thereafter be deemed to be enlisted or warrant officer personnel, as appropriate, for all purposes" are omitted as surplusage. The words "three months from June 29, 1948" and "whichever is later" are omitted as executed.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 7345, added Pub. L. 101–189, div. A, title I, §153(a)(1), Nov. 29, 1989, 103 Stat. 1387, related to submission of annual reports to Armed Services and Appropriations Committees of Senate and House of Representatives addressing aircraft requirements of the Navy, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 103–160, div. A, title VIII, §824(a)(9), Nov. 30, 1993, 107 Stat. 1708.

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–232, §809(a), substituted "section 7344" for "section 3964".

Pub. L. 115–232, §808(b)(13), renumbered section 3965 of this title as this section.

1988—Pub. L. 100–456 substituted "retired" for "regular" in section catchline.

1987—Pub. L. 100–180 struck out "Regular" before "Army who".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2018 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 115–232 effective Feb. 1, 2019, with provision for the coordination of amendments and special rule for certain redesignations, see section 800 of Pub. L. 115–232, set out as a note preceding section 3001 of this title.
### §7073. Chaplains

(a) There are chaplains in the Army. The Chaplains include—

(1) the Chief of Chaplains;

(2) commissioned officers of the Regular Army appointed as chaplains; and

(3) other officers of the Army appointed as chaplains in the Army.

(b) The Chief of Chaplains, while so serving, holds the grade of major general.

(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 170, §3073; renumbered §7073 and amended Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title V, §510(a), title VIII, §808(a), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1751, 1838.)

| Revised section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 3073 | 10:231a. | June 28, 1950, ch. 383, §309, 64 Stat. 270. |

The words "authorized by section 21f of this title", "as now or hereafter provided by law", and "and commissioned * * * or in any component thereof" are omitted as surplusage.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–232, §808(a), renumbered section 3073 of this title as this section.

Pub. L. 115–232, §510(a), designated existing provisions as subsec. (a) and added subsec. (b).

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2018 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 115–232 effective Feb. 1, 2019, with provision for the coordination of amendments and special rule for certain redesignations, see section 800 of Pub. L. 115–232, set out as a note preceding section 3001 of this title.