alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
APPENDIX C

Page 1



### SMALL COMMUNITY AIR SERVICE DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM

DOCKET OST

- 2011

- 0119

SUMMARY INFORMATION

All applicants mus t submit this information with their proposal , along with a completed form SF424 on http://

www.grants.gov.



### A. APPLICANT INF ORMATION: (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY)

⁭ X Not a Consortium ⁭ Interstate Consortium ⁭ Intrastate Consortium

⁭ Community now receives EAS subsidy

⁭ X Community (or Consortium member) previously received a Small Community Grant

If previous recipient : Date of Grant: Dec 14, 2007 E xpiration d ate of grant: Dec 14, 2010



### B. P UBLIC /P RIVATE P ARTNERSHIPS : (L IST ORGANIZATION NAMES )

Public Private

1. City of Starkville

2 . City of Columbus

3 . City of West Point

4 . Lowndes County

5 . Oktibbeha County



### C. P ROJECT P ROPOSAL : (C HECK ALL THAT APPLY)

⁭ Marketing ⁭ Upgrade Aircraft ⁭ X New Route

⁭ Travel Bank ⁭ Service Restoration ⁭ Subsidy

⁭ Surface Transportation ⁭ Regional Service X Revenue Guarantee ⁭

Launch New Carrier Start Up Cost Offset First Service

Study ⁭ X Secure Ad ditional Carrier Other (explain below)

_________________________________________________________________________________________________

_________________________________________________________________________________ ________________APPENDIX C

Page 2

⁭



### D. E XISTING L ANDING A IDS AT L OCAL A IRPORT:

⁭ X Full ILS X ⁭ Outer/Middle Marker X ⁭ Published Instrument Approach

⁭ X Localizer X ⁭ Other (specify ) DME



### E. PROJECT COSTS: DO NOT ENTER TEXT IN SHADED AREA

LINE DESCRIPTION SUB TOTAL TOTAL AMOUNT

1 Feder al amount requested 800,000

2 State cash financial contribution

Local cash financial contribution

3a Airport cash funds 0

3b Non

- airport cash funds 200000

3 Total local cash funds ( 3a +3b ) 1,000,000

4 TOTAL CASH FUNDING ( 1+2+3 ) 1,000,000

In

- Kind contribution

5a Airport In

- Kind contribution** 50,000

5b Other In

- Kind contribution**

5 TOTAL IN

- KIND CONTRIBUTION

( 5a + 5b ) 50,000

6 TOTAL PROJECT COST (4+8) 1,010,000



### F. IN

- KIND CONTRIBUTIONS**

For funds in lines 5a (Airport In

- Kin d contribution) and 7b (Other In

- Kind contribution), please describe the

source(s) of fund(s) for each.

Marketing

, reduced landing fees and terminal space rent

.APPENDIX C

Page 3



### G. IS THIS APPLICATION SUBJECT TO REV IEW BY STATE UNDER EXECUTIVE ORDER 12372 PROCESS?

⁭ a

. This application was made available to the State under the Executive Order 12372 Process for review on

(date)

___________________.

⁭ b. Program is subject to E.O. 12372, but has not been selected by the State for review.

⁭ XX c. Program is not covered by E.O. 12372.



### H. IS THE APPLICANT DELINQUENT ON ANY FEDERAL DEBT? (IF “YES”, PROVIDE EXPLANATION)

XX ⁭ No ⁭ Yes (explain)

__________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________

___________________________ _______________________________________________________________
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

RAMON PADILLA,

 Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

 State.

'

'

'

'

'

'

No. 08-12-00234-CR

Appeal from the

346th District Court

of El Paso County, Texas 

(TC# 20110D02154)

O R D E R

The Court GRANTS the State=s third motion for extension of time to file the brief 

until July 27, 2013. NO FURTHER MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE 

THE STATE=S BRIEF WILL BE CONSIDERED BY THIS COURT.

It is further ORDERED that the Hon. Jaime Esparza, the State’s Attorney, prepare the 

State=s brief and forward the same to this Court on or before July 27, 2013.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 20th day of June, 2013.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure, C.J., Rivera and Rodriguez, JJ.
Description of Materials Required for Plan Submittal 

(Per 40 C.F.R. Part 51, Appendix V, Section 2.0 - Criteria) 

Administrative Materials

(40 C.F.R. Part 51, Appendix V, Section 2.1) 

Appendix V 

Section Appendix V Requirement Documentation Provided in Submittal

Submittal 

Section

2.1(a) Formal letter of submittal Letter of Submittal Preface 

2.1(b) Evidence the plan has been 

adopted and the effective date 

Secretary’s Declaration of 

Adoption B 

2.1(c) Legal authority to adopt and 

implement plan 

Kansas Air Quality Statutes 

(K.S.A. Chapter 65, Article 30) 

Senate Substitute for HB 2369 

(as published in the Kansas 

Register on May 28, 2009) 

C 

2.1(d) Copy of actual regulation or 

document Regional Haze SIP D 

2.1(e) Evidence the State has followed 

all procedural requirements Hearing Officer’s Report E 

2.1(f) Evidence that public notice was 

provided 

Kansas Register – July 17, 2008 

Kansas Register – July 16, 2009 

Newspaper Affidavits of 

Publication 

F 

2.1(g) 

Certification that public hearing 

was held as per information in 

public notice 

Hearing Officer’s Report E 

2.1(h) 

Compilation of public 

comments and responses 

thereto 

Attachment 4 to the Hearing 

Officer’s Report E 
Technical Support

(40 C.F.R. Part 51, Appendix V, Section 2.2) 

Appendix V 

Section Appendix V Requirement Documentation Provided in Submittal

Submittal 

Section

2.2(a) Identification of all relevant pollutants 

affected by the plan Response as appropriate. G 

2.2(b) Identification of the location of 

affected sources under the plan Response as appropriate. G 

2.2(c) Quantification of the changes in the 

plan’s allowable emissions Response as appropriate. G 

2.2(d) Demonstration that the ambient air 

quality will not deteriorate, etc. Response as appropriate. G 

2.2(e) Modeling information Response as appropriate. G 

2.2(f) 

Evidence that emissions limits are 

continuous emission reduction 

technology-based 

Response as appropriate. G 

2.2(g) Evidence that plan contains emissions 

limits, etc. Response as appropriate. G 

2.2(h) Compliance/enforcement provisions Response as appropriate. G 

2.2(i) 

Special economic or technological 

justifications as needed, or 

explanation of why justification not 

needed 

Response as appropriate. G
IV

House Calendar No. 97

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 266

[Report No. 106–274]

Providing for consideration of a concurrent resolution waiving the requirement

in section 132 of the Legislative Reorganization Act of 1946 that the

Congress adjourn sine die not later than July 31, 1999.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 29, 1999

Mr. DREIER, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution;

which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

RESOLUTION

Providing for consideration of a concurrent resolution

waiving the requirement in section 132 of the Legislative

Reorganization Act of 1946 that the Congress adjourn

sine die not later than July 31, 1999.

1 Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution

2 it shall be in order to consider in the House a concurrent

3 resolution waiving the requirements in section 132 of the

4 Legislative Reorganization Act of 1946 that the Congress

5 adjourn sine die not later than July 31, 1999. The concur6 rent resolution shall be considered as read for amendment
2

HRES 266 RH

1 and shall not be subject to debate. The previous question

2 shall be considered as ordered on the concurrent resolution

3 to final adoption without intervening motion.

House Calendar No. 97

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 266

[Report No. 106–274]

RESOLUTION

Providing for consideration of a concurrent resolu31, 1999. the Congress adjourn sine die not later than July the Legislative Reorganization Act of 1946 that tion waiving the requirement in section 132 of

JULY 29, 1999

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be

printed
IV

House Calendar No. 117

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 305

[Report No. 106–342]

Providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 68), making

continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 2000, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 27, 1999

Mr. DREIER, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution;

which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

RESOLUTION

Providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res.

68), making continuing appropriations for the fiscal year

2000, and for other purposes.

1 Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution

2 it shall be in order without intervention of any point of

3 order to consider in the House the joint resolution (H.J.

4 Res. 68) making continuing appropriations for the fiscal

5 year 2000, and for other purposes. The joint resolution

6 shall be considered as read for amendment. The previous

7 question shall be considered as ordered on the joint resolu-
2

HRES 305 RH

1 tion to final passage without intervening motion except:

2 (1) one hour of debate equally divided and controlled by

3 the chairman and ranking minority member of the Com4 mittee on Appropriations; and (2) one motion to recommit.

House Calendar No. 117

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 305

[Report No. 106–342]

RESOLUTION

Providing for consideration of the joint resolution

(H.J. Res. 68), making continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 2000, and for other purposes.

SEPTEMBER 27, 1999

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be

printed
#### § 166.313 Is environmental compliance required?

Actions taken by the BIA under the regulations in this part must comply with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 *et seq.*), applicable regulations of the Council on Environmental Quality (40 CFR part 1500), and applicable tribal laws and regulations.
§ 162.201 Must agricultural land be managed in accordance with a tribe's agricultural resource management plan? ( a ) Agricultural land under the jurisdiction of a tribe must be managed in accordance with the goals and objectives in any agricultural resource management plan developed by the tribe, or by us in close consultation with the tribe, under AIARMA.
( b ) A ten-year agricultural resource management and monitoring plan must be developed through public meetings and completed within three years of the initiation of the planning activity. Such a plan must be developed through public meetings, and be based on the public meeting records and existing survey documents, reports, and other research from federal agencies, tribal community colleges, and land grant universities. When completed, the plan must: ( 1 ) Determine available agricultural resources;
( 2 ) Identify specific tribal agricultural resource goals and objectives;
( 3 ) Establish management objectives for the resources;
( 4 ) Define critical values of the Indian tribe and its members and identify holistic management objectives; and
( 5 ) Identify actions to be taken to reach established objectives.
( c ) Where the regulations in this subpart are inconsistent with a tribe's agricultural resource management plan, we may waive the regulations under part 1 of this title, so long as the waiver does not violate a federal statute or judicial decision or conflict with our general trust responsibility under federal law.
|   |
|---|
|   |  |
| 1 | I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Ally Auto Receivables Trust 2011-5 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”); |

|   |
|---|
|   |  |
| 2 | Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; |

|   |
|---|
|   |  |
| 3 | Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports; |

|   |
|---|
|   |  |
| 4 | I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer and based upon my knowledge and the compliance review conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and |

|   |
|---|
|   |  |
| 5 | All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K. |

|                                                               |
|---------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                               |  |
| /s/ Ryan C. Farris                                            |   |
|                                                          |
| Ryan C. Farris                                                |
| President, Ally Auto Assets LLC, as Depositor                 |
| (Senior Officer in charge of securitization of the depositor) |
### §1567. Duration of military protective orders

A military protective order issued by a military commander shall remain in effect until such time as the military commander terminates the order or issues a replacement order.

(Added Pub. L. 110–417, [div. A], title V, §561(a), Oct. 14, 2008, 122 Stat. 4470; amended Pub. L. 111–84, div. A, title X, §1073(a)(16), Oct. 28, 2009, 123 Stat. 2473.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2009—Pub. L. 111–84 made technical amendment to section catchline.
### §498. Unilateral change in nuclear weapons stockpile of the United States

(a) In General.—Other than pursuant to a treaty to which the Senate has provided advice and consent pursuant to section 2 of article II of the Constitution of the United States, if the President has under consideration to unilaterally change the size of the total stockpile of nuclear weapons of the United States, or the total number of deployed nuclear weapons (as defined under the New START Treaty), by more than 20 percent, prior to doing so the President shall initiate a Nuclear Posture Review.

(b) Terms of Reference.—Prior to the initiation of a Nuclear Posture Review under this section, the President shall determine the terms of reference for the Nuclear Posture Review, which the President shall provide to the congressional defense committees.

(c) Nuclear Posture Review.—Upon completion of a Nuclear Posture Review under this section, the President shall submit the Nuclear Posture Review to the congressional defense committees prior to implementing any change described in subsection (a).

(d) Construction.—This section shall not apply to changes to the nuclear weapons stockpile resulting from obligations pursuant to a treaty to which the Senate has provided advice and consent pursuant to section 2 of article II of the Constitution.

(e) Form.—A Nuclear Posture Review under this section shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex.

(f) New START Treaty Defined.—In this section, the term "New START Treaty" means the Treaty between the United States of America and the Russian Federation on Measures for the Further Reduction and Limitation of Strategic Offensive Arms, signed on April 8, 2010, and entered into force on February 5, 2011.

(Added Pub. L. 112–239, div. A, title X, §1038(a), Jan. 2, 2013, 126 Stat. 1927; amended Pub. L. 113–66, div. A, title X, §1091(a)(6), Dec. 26, 2013, 127 Stat. 875; Pub. L. 117–81, div. A, title XVI, §1633, Dec. 27, 2021, 135 Stat. 2090.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2021—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 117–81, §1633(1), added subsec. (a) and struck out former subsec. (a). Prior to amendment, text read as follows: "Other than pursuant to a treaty, if the President has under consideration to unilaterally change the size of the total stockpile of nuclear weapons of the United States by more than 25 percent, prior to doing so the President shall initiate a Nuclear Posture Review."

Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 117–81, §1633(2), substituted "described in subsection (a)" for "in the nuclear weapons stockpile by more than 25 percent".

Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 117–81, §1633(3), substituted "obligations pursuant to a treaty to which the Senate has provided advice and consent pursuant to section 2 of article II of the Constitution" for "treaty obligations".

Subsec. (f). Pub. L. 117–81, §1633(4), added subsec. (f).

2013—Pub. L. 113–66 inserted a period after the enumerator in section catchline.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Graham Packaging Holdings Company on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Warren D. Knowlton, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|   | 1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Graham Packaging Holdings Company. |
|--------|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

Date: August 3, 2007

 

 

| By:    | /s/ Warren D. Knowlton  |
|--------|-------------------------|
|   | Warren D. Knowlton      |
|   | Chief Executive Officer |

 

 

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
#### § 166.415 What will the BIA do if the permittee fails to make a direct payment to an Indian landowner?

Within five business days of the Indian landowner's notification to us that a payment has not been received, we will contact the permittee either in writing or by telephone requesting that the permittee provide documentation (e.g., canceled check, cash receipt voucher, copy of a money order or cashier's check) showing that payment has been made to the Indian landowner. If the permitee fails to provide such documentation, we will follow the procedures identified in § 166.419 of this part to collect the money on behalf of the Indian landowner or to cancel the permit.
§ 170.444 How is the NTTFI updated? ( a ) Submitting data into the NTTFI for a new facility is carried out on an annual basis as follows: ( 1 ) BIA Regional Offices provide each Tribe within its region with a copy of the Tribe's own NTTFI data during the first quarter of each fiscal year.
( 2 ) Tribes review the provided data and are responsible for entering all changes/updates into the database. This work must be completed by March 15. The submissions must include, at a minimum, all required minimum attachments (see § 170.446) and authorizing resolutions or similar official authorizations.
( 3 ) The BIA Regional Office reviews each Tribe's submission. If any errors or omissions are identified, the BIA Regional Office will return the submittals along with a request for corrections to the Tribe no later than May 15. If no errors or omissions are found, the BIA Regional Office validates the data and forwards it to BIADOT for review and approval.
( 4 ) The Tribe must correct any errors or omissions in the data entries or return the corrected submittals back to the BIA Regional Office by June 15.
( 5 ) Each BIA Regional Office must validate its regional data by July 15.
( 6 ) BIADOT approves the current inventory year submissions from BIA Regional Offices by September 30 or returns the submissions to the BIA Regional Office if additional work is required.
( 7 ) New facility data submitted outside of the above referenced dates are not guaranteed for inclusion in the official inventory identified in this subsection.
( b ) Updating the data on a facility currently listed in the NTTFI is carried out as follows: ( 1 ) At any time, a Tribe may submit a request to the BIA Region asking for the NTTFI data of an existing facility to be updated. The request must include the Tribe's updated data and background information on how and why the data was obtained. At the request of a Tribe, FHWA may assist BIA and the Tribe in updating the NTTFI data as required under this part.
( 2 ) The BIA Region must review the submitted data and respond to the Tribe within 30 days of its receipt. ( i ) If approved, the BIA Region validates the data and forwards it to BIADOT for review and approval.
( ii ) If not approved, the BIA Region returns the submittals to the Tribe along with a detailed written explanation and supporting documentation of the reasons for the disapproval. The Tribe must correct the data entries and return the corrected submittals back to the BIA Region.
( 3 ) BIADOT approves the current inventory year submittals from BIA Regional Offices or returns the submittals to the BIA Regional Office if additional work is required.
( c ) A Tribe may appeal the rejection of submitted data on a new or existing facility included in the NTTFI by filing a written notice of appeal to the Director, Bureau of Indian Affairs, with a copy to the BIA Regional Director.
( d ) To be included in the annual NTTFI update used for administrative and reporting purposes for any given fiscal year, submittals for new facilities and updates for existing facilities must be officially accepted by BIA and FHWA by September 30th of that year.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS

ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Global Crossing Limited (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending
March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John J. Legere, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to
§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       
|-----------------------
|Date: May 4, 2010      
|                       
|/S/ JOHN J. LEGERE     
|John J. Legere         
|Chief Executive Officer