alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
p.1 

OAR Box 1828 

Prepped by Ollie Stewart 

Document Number: 

157) M-K- (B) -156 

Docket Number: 

A-83-27 

Printed 11/12/2008 11:12:53 AM Sheet 157 of 325 
P.2 

ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS, INC. j - _-%_-%_-*—* 

— A-83-27 1655 NORTH FORT MYER DRIVE ARLINGTON, VIRGINIA 22209 703/528-1900 

I II-K-(B)-156 

November 6, 1984 

Mr. Robert Short 

Economic Analysis Branch 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

Mail Drop-12 

Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 

Subject: EPA Contract No. 68-02-3564, Work Assignment #19 

Additional IFCAM Projections 

Dear Robert: 

Enclosed are additional IFCAM projections for the fifth round S0? 

NSPS analysis. Recall that I forwarded IFCAM projections of solid ana 

liquid waste disposal requirements in a letter to you dated October 29, 

1984. 

TH/ce 

Enclosures 

cc: Dr. A. Wehe 

MANAGEMENT / ECONOMICS / ENGINEERING 
P.3 

TABLE 1. NATIONAL IMPACTS: REFERENCE CASE FUEL PRICES3 

Scenarios 

1990 Fuel use 

{% of total) 

coal oil 

5 

3 

3 

CM 3 

5 

5 

5 

65 

69 

52 

52 

43 

41 

36 

42 

1990 Fuel scrubbed 

(IO1* Btu) 

coal oil 

Baseline 

Option Case 1 

Option Case 2 

Option Case 3 

Option Case 4 

Option Case 5 

Option Case 6 

Option Case 6C 

5 

5 

5 

9 

15 

26 

26 

26 

N.A 

N.A 

64 

64 

191 

178 

178 

175 

aNew industrial fossil fuel-fired boilers larger than 100 MMBtu/hr and 

installed after 1985. 

Reference letter from T. Hogan to R. Short dated October 19, 1984. 

cSame as Option Case 6 except for an exemption from mandatory scrubbing 

for low (<30 percent) CU boilers which are subject to a 0.8 lb SO,/ 

MMBtu ceiling. Reference letter from T. Hogan to R. Short dated November 1, 1984. 

Probably less than 45 trillion Btu. 
P.4 

/ »• 

TABLE 2. NATIONAL IMPACTS: HIGHER OIL AND GAS PRICES3 

1990 Fuel scrubbed 

. (.% of total) (10 " Btu) 

Scenarios coal oil coal oil 

Baseline 

Option Case 1 

Option Case 2 

Option Case 3 

Option Case 4 

Option Case 5 

Option Case 6 

aNew industrial fossil fuel-fired boilers larger than 100 MMBtu/hr and 

installed after 1985. 

Reference letter from T. Hogan to R. Short dated October 19, 1984. 

1990 Fuel use 

(.% of total) 

coal oil 

57 

52 

50 

31 

31 

31 

30 

1 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

17 

17 

23 

153 

153 

153 

147 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0
Craggy Vegetation Management Project (Craggy Project)

Snag Distribution Analysis

To address the abundance and distribution of snag habitat across the Craggy project area, the 

following analysis was conducted:

• Analysis of suitable Northern Spotted Owl suitable habitat (nesting, roosting and foraging 

habitat) in the analysis area as described in the Craggy environmental impact statement.

• Field reviews to conduct snag abundance estimations in suitable Northern Spotted Owl habitat 

within the analysis area.

Analysis of Northern Spotted Owl suitable habitat as described in the environmental impact 

statement

The Craggy Project Wildlife Resource Report states that the analysis area for northern spotted 

owl provides zero acres of nesting and roosting habitat and 2,790 acres of foraging habitat for a 

total of 2,790 acres of suitable habitat (five percent of the analysis area). There are also 10,150

acres of dispersal habitat within the 44,350-acre analysis area. The suitable habitat is 

characterized as having well distributed of snags at or above Forest-wide snag standard and 

guideline levels of two to five snags per acre. Fire exclusion in particular has caused changes in 

stand structure by increasing elements such as snags and downed wood.

The conclusion is that none of this habitat will be removed or downgraded with the project. The 

entire project treatment area will retain snags in an abundance of two to five snags per acre.

Field Review of Snag Distribution.

On 9/21/2015 and 9/22/2015 a field review of snag distribution was made throughout the project 

area. This occurred along roads 45N39, 45N28, 46N27, 45N29, and 8J002 in the project. These 

roads were selected to represent an elevational cross section and a variety of aspects throughout

the project. This field review consisted of ocular estimates of snag distribution in areas of 

nesting, roosting and foraging habitat.

Snags in the project area are abundant and well distributed. In most areas of older forest habitat,

snags are above Forest Standard and Guideline minimal levels and are composed of trees greater 

than 24 inches in diameter at breast height in a spectrum of decay classes. There were many 

observations of pileated woodpecker during project field reviews which is an indicator of large 

snag habitat in late successional condition.

Conclusion

Based on my review of the distribution of Northern Spotted Owl habitat as described in the 

Craggy Project Wildlife Resource Report and my field review of the project, I conclude that

snags are abundant in the forested areas of the project and are well distributed in excess of Forest

Plan Forest-wide minimum Standards and Guidelines for snags.

Sam Cuenca

District Wildlife Biologist

Salmon/Scott Ranger District

July 10, 2017
ebc-20210930xex102x400my






 





 






 





 






 





 






 





 






 





 






 





 






 





 






 





 






 





 






 





 






 





 






 





 






 





 






 





 






 





 






 





 






 





 






 





 






 





 






 





 






 





 






 





 






 





 






 





 






 





 






 





 






 





 






- 27 -   61177540 v8  7.20.21 Schedule of Exhibits EXHIBIT A: Legal Description of Property EXHIBIT B.1:            September 12, 2019, Lease between  CB&TC, as landlord, and the Commonwealth of  Massachusetts, as tenant.      EXHIBIT B.2:            September 26, 2019, Lease between  CB&TC, as landlord, and the Commonwealth of  Massachusetts, as tenant.   EXHIBIT B.3:            April 7, 2021, License Agreement  between Eastern Bankshares, Inc, as licensor, and Sloan et  al, as licensee.  EXHIBIT C:  Lease with Eastern Bank  EXHIBIT D:  Form of Lease Assignment EXHIBIT E:               Representation Update Certificate EXHIBIT F:               State Form Tenant Estoppel  Certificate;   EXHIBIT G:              Post-Closing Occupancy Agreement EXHIBIT H:              Crocker Design Group, LLC               Certificate of Insurance
Bureau of Labor Statistics

Series Id:

Series title:

Labor force status:

Type of data:

Age:

Years:

Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

2001 316 281 281 258 242 241 277 276 314 291 329 373

2002 421 483 390 404 366 404 388 426 380 373 393 438

2003 494 415 460 496 466 517 525 455 436 410 412 394

2004 438 465 468 438 459 468 403 417 423 443 422 401

2005 445 455 452 432 400 357 443 387 440 368 398 415

2006 463 430 396 399 396 402 417 353 344 372 357 406

2007 502 429 413 392 396 370 420 457 398 369 377 430

2008 483 454 446 372 433 428 521 557 529 598 639 672

2009 794 830 947 917 903 969 1004 949 847 919 928 941

2010 1107 1083 1035 989 959 969 979 977 970 951 987 928

2011 1034 979 940 830 860 939 1018 991 922

Unemployed

Number in thousands

55 to 59 years

2001 to 2011

Labor Force Statistics from the Current Population Survey

Original Data Value

LNU03000094

Not Seasonally Adjusted

(Unadj) Unemployment Level - 55-59 yrs.

Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics Generated on: October 17, 2011 (10:52:30 AM)
Bureau of Labor Statistics

Annual

290

405

457

437

416

395

413

511

913

994

Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics Generated on: October 17, 2011 (10:52:30 AM)
UAVSA Release 1.1

U.S. D e p a rtme n t of T r a n sport a t io n

P a g e 1



# Transmitter Protocols

Ground Station Set up Checklist

A. PIC Operator

1. Unit: Check Transmitter for Damage

2. Battery: Check for Full Voltage B attery Packs (Test with Proper Battery Testing Unit for Actuals)

B. Remove Transmitter from Case, Inspect for damage Cracks, Antenna Secure,

switches, nobs, stick work properly.

C. Make Sure All Switches are in Start Positions

(All switches flipped away fro m operator)

LD and RD are Center

D. Power On Unit

Take note of Voltage and Time

E. Make Sure the correct UAS model is selected under “ model ”

Reset Timers (Timers are programmed to start when throttle is engaged)

F. Make sure all Trims are Centered

G. Connection, Test and Check UAS to Transmitter Parity

H. Perform Antenna Strength Test on Transmit

Gimbal Control

I. PIC Operator

3. Unit: Transmitter Protocols (Transmitter make and model)

4. Battery: Check for Full Voltage on

- B attery Packs (Test with Proper Battery

Testing Unit for Actuals)

J. Remove Transmitter from Case, Inspect for damage Cracks, Antenna Secure,

switches, nobs, stick work properly.

K. Make Sure All Switches are in Start Positions

(All switches flipped away fro m operator)

LD and RD are Center

L. Power On Unit ( Take note of Voltage and Time )UAVSA Release 1.1

U.S. D e p a rtme n t of T r a n sport a t io n

P a g e 2

M. Make sure all Trims are Centered

N. Make Sure C orrect Video Downlink is selected

O. Reset Timers (Timers are programmed to start when you push start)

P. Power Off Unit

Q. Make Sure Antennas on Video Downlink a re tight and secure

R. Power On Video Downlink

S. Connection Test w/ Video Downlink Receiver

T. Perform Antenna Strength Test on Transmitter

U. Make sure Gimbal Functions are working correctly

V. Make sure Video Connection is clear and signal is strong.
#### Dennis E. Sheehan v. Joseph Martin and Another.

—Motion dismissed, with ten dollars costs.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

# Army Aviators Become Sea Warriors

By Staff Sgt. William SalletteUS Army

                KAUAI, Hawaii  –              http://www.army.mil/article/119484/Army_Aviators_become_Sea_Warriors/

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT
156 So.2d 926

#### Ex parte Mary HAMILTON.

7 Div. 621.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

Sept. 26, 1963.

Rehearing Denied Oct. 31, 1963.

Oscar W. Adams, Jr., Birmingham, Norman C. Amaker and Jack Greenberg, New York City and Chas. S.' Conley, Montgomery, for petitioner.

Richmond M. Flowers, Atty. Gen., John G. Bookout, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Winston Huddleston, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.

MERRILL, Justice.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Etowah County to review a conviction of contempt of court.

Petitioner, Mary Hamilton, filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus in the Circuit Court of Etowah County. She was a witness in her own behalf and on cross examination she refused to answer the third question propounded to her. The trial court adjudged her to be in contempt and sentenced her to serve five days in jail and fined her $50. She has served the jail sentence.

The cross examination of petitioner was as follows:

> “Q What is your name, please?

> “A Miss Mary Hamilton.

> “Q Mary, I believe — you were arrested — who were you arrested • by?

> *575“A My name is Miss Hamilton. Please address me correctly.

> “Q Who were you arrested by, Mary ?

> “A I will not answer a question — ■

> “BY ATTORNEY AMAKER: The witness’s name is Miss Hamilton.

> “A ■ — your question until I am ad- . dressed correctly.

> “THE COURT: Answer the question.

> “THE WITNESS: I will not answer them unless I am addressed correctly.

> “THE COURT: You are in contempt of court—

> “ATTORNEY CONLEY: Your Honor — your Honor—

> “THE COURT: You are in contempt of this court, and you are sentenced to five days in jail and a fifty dollar fine.”

The power of the several courts to inflict summary punishment upon a witness for refusing to answer a lawful question is specifically authorized in Tit. 13, § 2, Code 1940.

“[I]t is every man’s duty to give testitimony before a duly constituted tribunal unless he invokes some valid legal exemption in withholding it.” Ullmann v. United States, 350 U.S. 422, *76*S.Ct. 497, 100 L.Ed. 511.

Here, the question was a lawful one and the witness invoked no valid legal exemption to support her refusal to answer it.

The record conclusively shows that petitioner’s name is Mary Hamilton, not Miss Mary Hamilton.

Many witnesses are addressed by various titles, but one s own name is an acceptable appellation at law. This practice is almost universal in the written opinions of courts.

In the cross examination of witnesses, a wide latitude is allowed resting in the sound discretion of the trial court and unless the discretion is grossly abused, the ruling of the court will not be overturned. Blount County v. Campbell, 268 Ala. 548, 109 So.2d 678; Kervin v. State, 254 Ala. 419, 48 So.2d 204. We hold that the trial court did not abuse its discretion and the record supports the summary punishment inflicted.

Petition for writ of certiorari denied.

LAWSON, GOODWYN and HAR-WOOD, JJ., concur. ¡>
§ 150.206 What actions will the LTRO take if it discovers a title defect? ( a ) If prior to recording a title document, the LTRO discovers that the title document omits one or more of the items required for recording by § 150.205(a) or (b), then the LTRO will notify the originating office to request correction. Once the omission is corrected, the LTRO will record the title document.
( b ) If prior to recording a title document, the LTRO discovers there is an error in one or more of the items required for recording by § 150.205(a) or (b), then the LTRO will record the title document, unless the defect is fatal, with a notation on title and notify the originating office to request correction. Once the error is corrected, the LTRO will record the corrected title document and remove the notation.
( c ) If the LTRO discovers a title defect during a title examination, the LTRO will notify the originating office of the defect, request correction, and make a notation in the record of title. Once the defect is corrected, the LTRO will record the corrected title document or other legal instruments to correct the title document and remove the notation.
( d ) If the defect is contained in a probate record, the LTRO will notify the Agency or Region to initiate corrective action with the OHA.
§ 162.702 How must records associated with this part be preserved? ( a ) Any organization, including a tribe or tribal organization, that has records identified in § 162.701(a) of this part, must preserve the records in accordance with approved Departmental records retention procedures under the Federal Records Act, 44 U.S.C. chapters 29, 31 and 33. These records and related records management practices and safeguards required under the Federal Records Act are subject to inspection by the Secretary and the Archivist of the United States.
( b ) A tribe or tribal organization should preserve the records identified in § 162.701(b) of this part, for the period of time authorized by the Archivist of the United States for similar Department of the Interior records under 44 U.S.C. chapter 33. If a tribe or tribal organization does not preserve records associated with its conduct of business with the Department of the Interior under this part, it may prevent the tribe or tribal organization from being able to adequately document essential transactions or furnish information necessary to protect its legal and financial rights or those of persons directly affected by its activities.
#### § 2.201 Do I need a lawyer in order to file a document in an appeal?

No. You may represent yourself. If you are represented by someone else, your representative must meet the standards established in 43 CFR part 1 and must provide documentation of his or her authority to act on your behalf.
§ 162.434 Must a lessee provide a performance bond for a business lease? The lessee must provide a performance bond or alternative form of security, except as provided in paragraph (f) of this section. ( a ) The performance bond or alternative form of security must be in an amount sufficient to secure the contractual obligations including: ( 1 ) No less than: ( i ) The highest annual rental specified in the lease, if compensation is paid annually; or
( ii ) If the compensation is not paid annually, another amount established by BIA in consultation with the tribe for tribal land or, where feasible, with Indian landowners for individually owned Indian land;
( 2 ) The construction of any required permanent improvements;
( 3 ) The operation and maintenance charges for any land located within an irrigation project; and
( 4 ) The restoration and reclamation of the leased premises, to their condition at the start of the lease term or some other specified condition.
( b ) The performance bond or other security: ( 1 ) Must be deposited with us and made payable only to us, and may not be modified without our approval, except as provided in paragraph (b)(2) of this section; and
( 2 ) For tribal land, if the lease so provides, may be deposited with the tribe and made payable to the tribe, and may not be modified without the approval of the tribe.
( c ) The lease must specify the conditions under which we may adjust security or performance bond requirements to reflect changing conditions, including consultation with the tribal landowner for tribal land before the adjustment.
( d ) We may require that the surety provide any supporting documents needed to show that the performance bond or alternative forms of security will be enforceable, and that the surety will be able to perform the guaranteed obligations.
( e ) The performance bond or other security instrument must require the surety to provide notice to us at least 60 days before canceling a performance bond or other security. This will allow us to notify the lessee of its obligation to provide a substitute performance bond or other security and require collection of the bond or security before the cancellation date. Failure to provide a substitute performance bond or security is a violation of the lease.
( f ) We may waive the requirement for a performance bond or alternative form of security if either: ( 1 ) The lease is for religious, educational, recreational, cultural, or other public purposes; or
( 2 ) The Indian landowners request it and we determine a waiver is in the Indian landowners' best interest.
( g ) For tribal land, we will defer, to the maximum extent possible, to the tribe's determination that a waiver of a performance bond or alternative form of security is in its best interest.
In accordance with 14 CFR 11, Cessna Aircraft Company is requesting an exemption from the 

requirements of 14 CFR 91.409 (a) and (b) to allow the published Inspection Document Program 

(reference 208/208B Aircraft Maintenance Manual, Revision 24 or later) to be accepted as an 

inspection program recommended by the manufacturer (reference 14 CFR 91.409 (f) (3)). The 

208/208B Inspection Document task based inspection program was developed from the 

208/208B Phasecard Inspection Program that was accepted by the FAA as “a manufacturers

approved inspection program.” on October 24, 1990. This exemption would allow operators to 

select a manufacturer recommended program that is task based and integrated into the 208/208B 

published Instructions for Continued Airworthiness.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 324 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                      November 2, 1999.
Whereas our civilization is founded upon the values of honesty, courtesy, and 
        respectful consideration among its citizens;
Whereas we seek to teach and reaffirm these fundamental values of civility;
Whereas a lack of civility in recent years has become frighteningly apparent, as 
        seen in media tales of road rage and school violence, of personal deceit 
        and public corruption;
Whereas common courtesy has become bewilderingly uncommon;
Whereas a large part of many Americans' behavior can be traced to a failure to 
        honor the codes of civil conduct that have governed society for many 
        generations;
Whereas the teaching of courtesy has declined while the celebration of vulgarity 
        and effrontery has increased;
Whereas many Americans have ceased to honor the good examples that surround 
        them;
Whereas in this context, too many people find it easy to manifest disrespect for 
        other age groups, races, and religions;
Whereas National Civility Week, Inc., is a nonpartisan and nonprofit corporation 
        devoted to reintroducing civility in our Nation;
Whereas National Civility Week, Inc., has encouraged the establishment of 
        Civility Weeks in a number of States in an effort to reaffirm society's 
        commitment to adhere to well-established rules of civil conduct;
Whereas National Civility Week, Inc., will honor those who practice common 
        decency and simple honesty; and
Whereas National Civility Week, Inc., will draw attention to the behaviors and 
        standards that we respect as a people, and will celebrate the conduct 
        that ties together the threads of our social fabric: Now, therefore, be 
        it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives supports these efforts 
to restore civility, honesty, integrity, and respectful consideration 
in the United States.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```