alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Horace Jones v. The State.

No. 22869.

Delivered May 17, 1944.

Rehearing Denied June 14, 1944.

The opinion states the case.

*W. E. Pinkston*and A. *S. Baskett,*both of .Dallas, for appellant

*Ernest S. Goefis,*State’s Attorney, of Austin, for the State.

KRUEGER, Judge.

The offense is robbery. The punishment assessed is confinement in the state penitentiary for a term of five years.

Appellant, in due time, filed a motion to quash the indictment upon two grounds: First, that it was vague, uncertain and ambiguous; and second, because Judge Grover Adams, the duly elected, qualified and acting judge of the Criminal District Court of Dallas County, Texas, had died before the indictment-in this case was returned; that by reason thereof the Criminal District Court of Dallas County had no qualified judge presiding over said court to receive the indictment.

*399We have examined the indictment with reference to the first contention made by the • appellant and reached the conclusion that it is sufficiently definite and certain in its allegations so as to apprise him of the nature of the accusation against him.

With reference to the second contention, we deem it only necessary to here refer to the well-considered opinion by Judge Davidson in the case of Pierson v. State, 177 S. W. (2d) 975, which disposes of that question adversely to him.

No bills of exception appear in the transcript. Neither is there a statement of facts accompanying the same'.

It is therefore ordered that the judgment of the trial court be, and the same is, in all things affirmed.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING.

GRAVES, Judge.

Appellant in his motion, we think, confuses the statute now found as Section 5, Article 200a, Vernon’s R. C. S., passed at the Regular Session 48th Legislature, page 25, with Art. 5, Sec. 28, of our State ‘ Constitution, which latter provision merely authorizes the governor of the State to appoint district judges to succeed those resigned or deceased.

Under the above act of the 48th Legislature, p. 25, there is no appointment of any person to take the place of a judge, deceased or resigned. The act merely provides,' among other things, as follows:

> “* * * and judges may also be assigned in the manner herein provided for the holding of a district court, when by reason of the death, resignation, or from any cause whatsoever, the office of district judge of the district is or has become vacant.”

We think the judge assigned by the Presiding Judge of the Administrative District was not an appointment as is contemplated by Art. 5, Section 28, of the State Constitution. We think this matter was correctly settled in the case of Pierson v. State, referred to in the original opinion, and the motion will be overruled.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Okinawa Residents, Status of Forces Agreement Members Gather for Okinawa Memorial Day Services

By Cpl. Janessa Pon

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More Articles/News
# L_2013300EN.01000501.xml

| 9.11.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 300/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.11.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 300/5

---

Notice concerning the entry into force of the Treaty of Accession between the Kingdom of Belgium, the Republic of Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, the Kingdom of Denmark, the Federal Republic of Germany, the Republic of Estonia, Ireland, the Hellenic Republic, the Kingdom of Spain, the French Republic, the Italian Republic, the Republic of Cyprus, the Republic of Latvia, the Republic of Lithuania, the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg, the Republic of Hungary, the Republic of Malta, the Kingdom of the Netherlands, the Republic of Austria, the Republic of Poland, the Portuguese Republic, Romania, the Republic of Slovenia, the Slovak Republic, the Republic of Finland, the Kingdom of Sweden, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (Member States of the European Union) and the Republic of Croatia concerning the accession of the Republic of Croatia to the European Union

Further to the deposit of all instruments of ratification and pursuant to Article 3(3) thereof, the Treaty of Accession, signed in Brussels on 9 December 2011, entered into force on 1 July 2013.

---
#### John Veltri, Respondent, v. F. W. Gesswein Company, Appellant.

Order modified by inserting therein as a further condition that the plaintiff pay all costs of the action to date, and ten dollars costs of motion, and as so modified affirmed, without costs. No opinion.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access to publicationsin the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging and locatorservices, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications (CGP). Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event that publicationsare no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title: Preliminarygeologic map of the western and southern parts of the Byers Peak, thenorthwestern part of the Loveland Pass, and the eastern part of the Ute Peak 71/2 minute quadrangles, Clear Creek and Grand Counties, Colorado**
 
Report | Plates: 0102
 
SuDoc Number:I 19.76:84-274
Item Number:0624-H (online)
CGP systemNumber:001041401
 
September 4, 2018
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 OCT-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                         589,875
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  779,724
<ALLOWANCES>                                   20,949
<INVENTORY>                                    2,399,257
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               3,924,637
<PP&E>                                         3,564,053
<DEPRECIATION>                                 740,990
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 7,170,779
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          5,866,223
<BONDS>                                        2,165,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          13
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       1,427
<OTHER-SE>                                     0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   7,170,779
<SALES>                                        7,094,034
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               7,094,034
<CGS>                                          5,343,331
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  7,045,709
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               119,522
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             162,810
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (132,007)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   42,947
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (89,060)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (89,060)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.006)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0



</TABLE>
### §7329. Computation of retired pay: law applicable

A member of the Army retired under this chapter is entitled to retired pay computed under chapter 745 of this title.

(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 230, §3929; renumbered §7329 and amended Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, §§808(b)(12), 809(a), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1838, 1840.)

| Revised section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 3929 | [No source]. | [No source]. |

The revised section is based on the various retirement provisions in this chapter and is inserted to make explicit the entitlement to retired pay upon retirement.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–232, §809(a), substituted "chapter 745" for "chapter 371".

Pub. L. 115–232, §808(b)(12), renumbered section 3929 of this title as this section.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2018 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 115–232 effective Feb. 1, 2019, with provision for the coordination of amendments and special rule for certain redesignations, see section 800 of Pub. L. 115–232, set out as a note preceding section 3001 of this title.
### §2205. Reimbursements

(a) Availability of Reimbursements.—Reimbursements made to appropriations of the Department of Defense or a department or agency thereof under sections 1535 and 1536 of title 31, or other amounts paid by or on behalf of a department or agency of the Department of Defense to another department or agency of the Department of Defense, or by or on behalf of personnel of any department or organization, for services rendered or supplies furnished, may be credited to authorized accounts. Funds so credited are available for obligation for the same period as the funds in the account so credited. Such an account shall be accounted for as one fund on the books of the Department of the Treasury.

(b) Fixed Rate for Reimbursement for Certain Services.—The Secretary of Defense and the Secretaries of the military departments may charge a fixed rate for reimbursement of the costs of providing planning, supervision, administrative, or overhead services incident to any construction, maintenance, or repair project to real property or for providing facility services, irrespective of the appropriation financing the project or facility services.

(Added Pub. L. 87–651, title II, §207(a), Sept. 7, 1962, 76 Stat. 520; amended Pub. L. 96–513, title V, §511(71), Dec. 12, 1980, 94 Stat. 2926; Pub. L. 97–258, §3(b)(4), Sept. 13, 1982, 96 Stat. 1063; Pub. L. 103–337, div. B, title XXVIII, §2804(a), (b)(1), Oct. 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 3053.)

| Revised section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2205 | 5:172g. | July 26, 1947, ch. 343, §408; added Aug. 10, 1949, ch. 412, §11 (23d par.), 63 Stat. 590. |

5 U.S.C. 172g is restated to reflect more clearly its purpose to authorize the Department of Defense to operate as an integrated department by permitting supplies to be furnished and services to be rendered within and among agencies of the Department of Defense and provide that reimbursements therefor be credited to authorized accounts and be available for the same purpose and period as the accounts so credited. (See Senate Report No. 366, 81st Congress, pp. 23, 24.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1994—Pub. L. 103–337 substituted "Reimbursements" for "Availability of reimbursements" as section catchline, designated existing provisions as subsec. (a) and inserted subsec. heading, and added subsec. (b).

1982—Pub. L. 97–258 substituted "sections 1535 and 1536 of title 31" for "the Act of March 4, 1915 (31 U.S.C. 686)".

1980—Pub. L. 96–513 substituted "the Act of March 4, 1915 (31 U.S.C. 686)" for "section 686 of title 31".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1980 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 96–513 effective Dec. 12, 1980, see section 701(b)(3) of Pub. L. 96–513, set out as a note under section 101 of this title.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                            JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                              SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                         77,657
<SECURITIES>                                   23,391
<RECEIVABLES>                                  18,165
<ALLOWANCES>                                    4,266
<INVENTORY>                                     5,315
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              123,015
<PP&E>                                         18,387
<DEPRECIATION>                                  7,526
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                320,641
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          14,801
<BONDS>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                          294
<OTHER-SE>                                    305,546
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  320,641
<SALES>                                        36,601
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               36,601
<CGS>                                          28,743
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  60,083
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            (5,702)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (46,523)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (46,523)
<DISCONTINUED>                                  4,436
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (42,087)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      1.54
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    1.54


</TABLE>
### §3101. Definitions

In this chapter, the term "acquisition" has the meaning provided in section 131 of title 41.

(Added Pub. L. 111–383, div. A, title VIII, §861(a), Jan. 7, 2011, 124 Stat. 4288, §2545; amended Pub. L. 113–291, div. A, title X, §1071(a)(11), Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3505; renumbered §3101 and amended Pub. L. 116–283, div. A, title XVIII, §1808(a)(2), (b)(1), Jan. 1, 2021, 134 Stat. 4159, 4160.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 2545 of this title, which was transferred to this section by Pub. L. 116–283, §1808(a)(2), was also transferred or copied in large part to section 3001 of this title by Pub. L. 116–283, §1806(a)(2)–(4).

#### Amendments

2021—Pub. L. 116–283, §1808(b)(1), substituted "In this chapter, the term" for "In this chapter:", par. (1) designation, and "The term" and struck out pars. (2) to (4) which defined "defense acquisition system", "element of the defense acquisition system", and "acquisition workforce".

Pub. L. 116–283, §1808(a)(2), renumbered section 2545 of this title as this section.

2014—Par. (1). Pub. L. 113–291 substituted "section 131 of title 41" for "section 4(16) of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 403(16))".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2021 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 116–283 effective Jan. 1, 2022, with additional provisions for delayed implementation and applicability of existing law, see section 1801(d) of Pub. L. 116–283, set out as a note preceding section 3001 of this title.
EXHIBIT 32

Via EDGAR

Securities and Exchange Commission

100 F Street, N.E.

Washington, D.C. 20549

Re: Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Ladies and Gentlemen:

In connection with the Annual Report of Whiting USA Trust II (the Trust) on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, not in its individual capacity but solely as the trustee of the Trust, certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to its knowledge:

(1) The Report
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.

The above certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) and is not
being filed as part of the Form 10-K or as a separate disclosure document.



|                     |  |  |  |     |  |                                           
|-------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | ------------------------------------------
|Date: March 28, 2013 |  |  |  |     |  | The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company,
|                     |  |  |  |     |  | N.A., Trustee for Whiting USA Trust II    
|                     |  |  | 
|                     |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ MIKE ULRICH                           
|                     |  |  |  |     |  | Mike Ulrich                               
|                     |  |  |  |     |  | Vice President
IV

House Calendar No. 36

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 138

[Report No. 106–93]

Providing for the consideration of the bill (H.R. 472) to amend title 13,

United States Code, to require the use of postcensus local review as

part of each decennial census.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 13, 1999

Mr. SESSIONS, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

RESOLUTION

Providing for the consideration of the bill (H.R. 472) to

amend title 13, United States Code, to require the use

of postcensus local review as part of each decennial census.

1 Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution

2 it shall be in order to consider in the House the bill (H.R.

3 472) to amend title 13, United States Code, to require

4 the use of postcensus local review as part of each decennial

5 census. The bill shall be considered as read for amend6 ment. The amendment printed in the report of the Com-
2

HRES 138 RH

1 mittee on Rules accompanying this resolution shall be con2 sidered as adopted. The previous question shall be consid3 ered as ordered on the bill, as amended, and on any fur4 ther amendment thereto to final passage without inter5 vening motion except: (1) one hour of debate on the bill,

6 as amended, equally divided and controlled by the chair7 man and ranking minority member of the Committee on

8 Government Reform; (2) a further amendment printed in

9 the Congressional Record and numbered 1 pursuant to

10 clause 8 of rule XVIII, if offered by Representative

11 Maloney of New York or her designee, which shall be con12 sidered as read and shall be separately debatable for one

13 hour equally divided and controlled by the proponent and

14 an opponent; and (3) one motion to recommit with or

15 without instructions.

House Calendar No. 36

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 138

[Report No. 106–93]

RESOLUTION

Providing for the consideration of the bill (H.R.

of each decennial census.require the use of postcensus local review as part472) to amend title 13, United States Code, to

APRIL 13, 1999

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be

printed
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access to publicationsin the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging and locatorservices, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications (CGP). Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event that publicationsare no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title: Licenseecontractor & vendor inspection status report.**
 
 
 
Vol.  18_#4.pdf
 
Vol.  19_#1.pdf
 
Vol.  19_#2.pdf
 
Vol.  19_#3.pdf
 
Vol.  19_#4.pdf
 
Vol.  20_#1.pdf
 
Vol.  20_#2.pdf
 
Vol.  20_#4.pdf
 
Vol.  21_#1.pdf
 
Vol.  21_#2.pdf
 
Vol.  21_#3.pdf
 
Vol.  21_#4.pdf
 
Vol.  23_#3.pdf
 
Vol.  23_#4.pdf
 
 
SuDoc Number:Y 3.N 88:24/
Item Number:1051-H-10 (online)
CGP systemNumber:001043297
 
January 31, 2018
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EX PIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

SIDNEY DEON REYNOLDS, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D16-5271 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ___________________________________) Opinion filed August 2, 2017. Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Michelle Sisco, Judge. Sidney Deon Reynolds, pro se.

CASANUEVA, Judge. Sidney Deon Reynolds appeals the postconviction court's order s ummarily denying his motion for postconviction relief in three separate cases. In his motion, he asserted three claims of error. Claims one and two sought post conviction relief pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. Finding no error, we affirm the postconviction court's order summarily denying claims one and t wo. The third and remaining claim asserted an illegal sentence cla im pursuant- 2 - to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). Specifically, Mr. Reynolds alleged that the enhancement of his mandatory minimum sentence resulted in a n illegal sentence. Rule 3.800(a)(1) provides that "[a] court may at any time corr ect an illegal sentence imposed by it." To the extent that the postconviction court's order can be read to bar this claim as untimely, that basis is incorrect. Altern atively, to the extent that the order can be read as failing to rule upon this claim, a remand for disposition is appropriate. In remanding this matter for further proceedings, we are not s uggesting the remaining claim is meritorious. Rather, that decision rema ins to be made by the postconviction court. Affirmed in part; reversed in part; remanded for further proce edings.

WALLACE and BADALAMENTI, JJ., Concur.