alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### Geology of San Nicolas Island, California

By: J.G. VedderRobert M. Norris

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/pp369

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 3**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 4**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 5**                            (pdf) 
- Superseded Publications:
                                        Preliminary report on the geology of San Nicolas Island, California(1956)                                    

- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-40251 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus VICTOR PRADO-MARTINEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. B-03-CR-326-2

-------------------- Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and PICKERING, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Victor Prado-Martinez (Prado) appeals from his guilty-plea conviction for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute more than 1,000 kilograms of marijuana. Prado contends for the first time on appeal that 21 U.S.C. § 841(a) and (b) are facially unconstitutional in view of Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466 (2000). Prado acknowledges that his argument is foreclosed by United States v. Slaughter , 238 F.3d 580 (5th Cir. 2000), but he seeks to preserve his argument for further review. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## F I L E D August 18, 2004 Charles R. Fulbruge III ClerkNo. 04-40251 -2-
In Apprendi , 530 U.S. at 490, the Supreme Court held that “[o]ther than the fact of a prior conviction, any fact that increases the penalty for a crime beyond the prescribed statutory maximum must be submitted to a jury, and proved beyond a reasonable doubt.” This court has rejected the argument that Apprendi rendered the sentencing provisions of 21 U.S.C. § 841 facially unconstitutional. See Slaughter , 238 F.3d at 582. As Prado concedes, the court’s opinion in Slaughter forecloses his argument. See id. The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
§ 161.2 What are the Secretary's authorities under this part? ( a ) Under Section 640d-9(e) of the Settlement Act, lands partitioned under the Settlement Act are subject to the jurisdiction of the tribe to whom partitioned. The laws of the tribe apply to the partitioned lands as in paragraphs (a)(1) and (a)(2) of this section. ( 1 ) Effective October 6, 1980: ( i ) All conservation practices on the Navajo Partitioned Lands, including control and range restoration activities, must be coordinated and executed with the concurrence of the Navajo Nation; and
( ii ) All grazing and range restoration matters on the Navajo Reservation lands must be administered by BIA, under applicable laws and regulations.
( 2 ) Effective April 18, 1981, the Navajo Nation has jurisdiction and authority over any lands partitioned to it and over all persons on these lands. This jurisdiction and authority apply: ( i ) To the same extent as is applicable to those other portions of the Navajo reservation; and
( ii ) Notwithstanding any provision of law to the contrary, except where there is a conflict with the laws and regulations referred to in paragraph (a) of this section.
( b ) Under the Agricultural Act, the Secretary is authorized to: ( 1 ) Carry out the trust responsibility of the United States and promote Indian tribal self-determination by providing for management of Indian agricultural lands and renewable resources consistent with tribal goals and priorities for conservation, multiple use, and sustained yield;
( 2 ) Take part in managing Indian agricultural lands, with the participation of the land's beneficial owners, in a manner consistent with the Secretary's trust responsibility and with the objectives of the beneficial owners;
( 3 ) Provide for the development and management of Indian agricultural lands; and
( 4 ) Improve the expertise and technical abilities of Indian tribes and their members by increasing the educational and training opportunities available to Indian people and communities in the practical, technical, and professional aspects of agricultural and land management.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-1647

In Re: MUZIO B. ROBERTO and MARY K. ROBERTO,

Debtors.

_________________________

MUZIO B. ROBERTO; MARY K. ROBERTO,

Debtors - Appellants,

versus

JOSEPH NAPOLI; MARION NAPOLI,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge. (CA98-2831-DKC, BK-98-12440, AP-98-1A445)

Submitted: July 8, 1999 Decided: July 14, 1999

Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Muzio B. Roberto, Mary K. Roberto, Appellants Pro Se. Matthew

Wilson Black, Jr., HEENEY, ARMSTRONG & HEENEY, Rockville, Maryland,

for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
1 We deny the Napolis’ motion for summary affirmance, motion

for sanctions, and motion to consolidate.

2 Although the district court’s order is marked as “filed” on

April 8, 1999, the district court’s records show that it was

entered on the docket sheet on April 19, 1999. Pursuant to Rules

58 and 79(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, it is the

date that the order was entered on the docket sheet that we take as

the effective date of the district court’s decision. See Wilson v.

Murray, 806 F.2d 1232, 1234-35 (4th Cir. 1986).

2

PER CURIAM:

Muzio and Mary Roberto appeal from the district court’s order

dismissing their appeal from the bankruptcy court’s orders granting

the Napolis’ motion for relief from automatic stay. Our review of

the record and the opinions below discloses no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.1

See Roberto v. Napoli, Nos. CA-98-2831-DKC; BK-98-12440 (D. Md.

Apr. 19, 1999).2 We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
# C_2013151EN.01000101.xml

| 30.5.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 151/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.5.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 151/1

---

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the TFEU

Cases where the Commission raises no objections

(Text with EEA relevance, except for products falling under Annex I to the Treaty)

2013/C 151/01

| Date of adoption of the decision | 22.4.2013 |
| --- | --- |
| Reference number of State Aid | SA.35910 (12/N) |
| Member State | Latvia |
| Region | Latvia | — |
| Title (and/or name of the beneficiary) | Grozījumi atbalsta shēmā “Atbalsts kredītgarantiju veidā” |
| Legal basis | 1. | Ministru kabineta 2009. gada 7. jūlija noteikumos Nr. 746 “Lauksaimniecības un lauku attīstības kredītu garantēšanas kārtība”; |

Date of adoption of the decision

22.4.2013

Reference number of State Aid

SA.35910 (12/N)

Member State

Latvia

Region

Latvia

—

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

Grozījumi atbalsta shēmā “Atbalsts kredītgarantiju veidā”

Legal basis

1.

Ministru kabineta 2009. gada 7. jūlija noteikumos Nr. 746 “Lauksaimniecības un lauku attīstības kredītu garantēšanas kārtība”;

| 2. | Ministru kabineta noteikumu projekts “Grozījumi Ministru kabineta 2009. gada 7. jūlija noteikumos Nr. 746 “Lauksaimniecības un lauku attīstības kredītu garantēšanas kārtība” ”. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Ministru kabineta noteikumu projekts “Grozījumi Ministru kabineta 2009. gada 7. jūlija noteikumos Nr. 746 “Lauksaimniecības un lauku attīstības kredītu garantēšanas kārtība” ”.

Type of measure

Scheme

—

Objective

Investment in processing and marketing, Investments in agricultural holdings, Setting up of young farmers

Form of aid

Guarantee

Budget

| | Overall budget: LVL 250 million |
| --- | --- |

Overall budget: LVL 250 million

| | Annual budget: LVL 50 million |
| --- | --- |

Annual budget: LVL 50 million

Intensity

80 %

Duration (period)

Until 30.12.2013

Economic sectors

Agriculture, forestry and fishing

Name and address of the granting authority

| Lauku attīstības fonds |
| --- |
| Republikas laukums 2 |
| Rīga, LV-1981 |
| LATVIJA |

Lauku attīstības fonds

Republikas laukums 2

Rīga, LV-1981

LATVIJA

Other information

—

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

http://ec.europa.eu/competition/elojade/isef/index.cfm

---
O pinion filed November 6 , 201 4



### In The 

# Eleventh Court of Appeals

____ _ ______


### No. 11

- 14

- 00 210

- C R

_____ __ ____



### THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellan t

V.

HUMBERTO LINARES PALMA , Appellee

On Appeal from the 441s t District Court
Midland County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No

. CR 38386

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

The State of Texas has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal

. The State filed
a notice of appeal from the trial court’s order granting the motion to suppress filed
by the defendant, Humberto Linares Palma. Palma died prior to the disposition of
this appeal. Attached to the State’s motion to dismiss is a copy of Pal ma’s death

certificate. The State correctly points out that all of the issues in this appeal have

become moot due to Palma’s death. Therefore, b ecause the State is the appealing

party, we must dismiss the appeal

. State v. McCaffrey , 76 S.W.3d 392, 392

– 9 32 (Tex. Crim. App. 2002); cf. T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 7.1(a)(2) (if the “appellant” in a
criminal case dies during the appeal, the proper disposition of the appeal is
permanent abatement).
The motion is granted, and the appeal is dismissed.

PER CURIAM

November 6 , 2014
Do not publish. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 47.2(b).
Panel consists of: Wright, C.J., Willson, J

. , and Bailey, J.
Cite as 2020 Ark. 207

SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS

Opinion Delivered: May 21, 2020

IN RE BOARD OF CERTIFIED 

COURT REPORTER EXAMINERS

PER CURIAM

The court appoints the Honorable Blake Batson of Arkadelphia, Circuit Judge, 

Ninth-East Judicial Circuit, and Dana Hayden of Fayetteville, Certified Court Reporter, to 

the Board of Certified Court Reporter Examiners for three-year terms to expire on July 31, 

2023. The court extends its appreciation to these new members for their willingness to serve 

on this important board. 

The Honorable Jodi Raines Dennis of Pine Bluff, Circuit Judge, Eleventh-West 

Judicial Circuit, Julie Beckman of Greenbrier, Certified Court Reporter, and G. Michael 

Ashcraft of Warren, Certified Court Reporter, are reappointed to the Board of Certified

Court Reporter Examiners for three-year terms to expire on July 31, 2023. The court 

thanks them for their continued service on this board.

The court expresses its gratitude to the Honorable Eddy R. Easley of Sheridan, 

Circuit Judge, Seventh Judicial Circuit, and Garold W. Pritsch of Hot Springs, Certified 

Court Reporter, whose terms have expired, for their years of valuable service to this board.

We wish them well.
50 gpm 75 gpm

Static Screen (Hycor Hydroscreen) cost 14,000.00 $ 17,000.00 $ model number HS-18ST HS-36ST electrical requirements N/A N/A dimensions L41" X W22" X H61" L41" X W40" X H61" shipping weight 200 460 Externally-fed rotary screen Hycor Rotostrainer cost 30,000.00 $ 30,000.00 $ model number RSA-2512 RSA-2512 electrical requirements 1/3 hp 1/3 hp dimensions L55.89" X W39.17" X H52.61" L55.89" X W39.17" X H52.61" shipping weight 600 600 Internally-fed rotary screen Hycor Rotoshear cost xxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxx

model number electrical requirements dimensions shipping weight100 gpm 200 gpm 500 gpm

17,000.00 $ 21,000.00 $ xxxxxxxxx HS-36ST HS-48ST N/A N/A L41" X W40" X H61" L60" X W53.21" X H84" 460 738

32,000.00 $ 37,000.00 $ 42,000.00 $ RSA-2524 RSA-2548 RSA-2572 1/3 hp 1/2 hp 1/2 hp L55.89" X W51.17" X H52.61"L55.89" X W77.47" X H52.61"L101.47" X W60.89" X H50.61" 716 989 1297

xxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxx 51,000.00 $ HRS-3672DV 1/2 hp L118.56" X W66.5" X H83.06" 1700750 gpm 1000 gpm 1500 gpm

xxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxx

82,000.00 $ 82,000.00 $ 130,000.00 $ RSA-36120 RSA-36120 2 x RSA-3672 1 hp 1 hp 2 x 3/4 hp L152.44" X W97.21" X H66.75"L152.44" X W97.21" X H66.75"L104.56" X W72.74" X H69"(per Model) 2940 29401850 / Model

76,000.00 $ 80,000.00 $ 86,000.00 $ HRS-4872M HRS-4884M HRS-6096DV 1 hp 1 hp 1.5 hp L145.29" X W83.50" X H64.55"L157.29" X W83.50" X H64.55"L164.07" X W91.75" X H110.75" 2640 2751 44952000 gpm 2500 gpm

xxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxx

164,000.00 $ 164,000.00 $ 2 x RSA-36120 2 x RSA-36120 2 x 1 hp 2 x 1hp L152.44" X W97.21" X H66.75" (per Model) L152.44" X W97.21" X H66.75" (per Model) 2940 / Model 2940 / Model

100,000.00 $ 168,000.00 $ HRS-60120DV 2 x HRS-6096DV 2 hp 2 x 1.5 hp L188.07" X W91.75" X H110.75" L164.07" X W91.75" X H110.75"(per model) 48504495 / model3000 gpm

xxxxxxxxx

246,000.00 $ 3 x RSA-36120 3 x 1 hp L152.44" X W97.21" X H66.75" (per Model) 2940 / Model

168,000.00 $ 2 x HRS-6096DV 2 x 1.5 hp L164.07" X W91.75" X H110.75"(per model) 4495 / model$-

$50,000 $100,000 $150,000 $200,000 $250,000

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 static screen external screen internal screen
### §2495a. Overseas package stores: treatment of United States wines

The Secretary of Defense shall ensure that each nonappropriated-fund activity engaged principally in selling alcoholic beverage products in a packaged form (commonly referred to as a "package store") that is located at a military installation outside the United States shall give appropriate treatment with respect to wines produced in the United States to ensure that such wines are given, in general, an equitable distribution, selection, and price when compared with wines produced by the host nation.

(Added Pub. L. 100–180, div. A, title III, §311(a)(1), Dec. 4, 1987, 101 Stat. 1073, §2489; renumbered §2495a, Pub. L. 108–375, div. A, title VI, §651(b)(2), (c)(5), Oct. 28, 2004, 118 Stat. 1971, 1972.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2004—Pub. L. 108–375 renumbered section 2489 of this title as this section.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Regulations Deadline

Pub. L. 100–180, div. A, title III, §311(b), Dec. 4, 1987, 101 Stat. 1073, directed Secretary of Defense to prescribe regulations to implement this section not later than 90 days after Dec. 4, 1987.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# 3rd Landing Support Battalion Marines Start Combined Distribution Exercise in South Korea 

By  Lance Cpl. Sydni Jessee 3rd Marine Logistics Group

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More
§ 500.110 Self-evaluation. ( a ) The agency shall, by August 24, 1987, evaluate its current policies and practices, and the effects thereof, that do not or may not meet the requirements of this part, and, to the extent modification of any such policies and practices is required, the agency shall proceed to make the necessary modifications.
( b ) The agency shall provide an opportunity to interested persons, including handicapped persons or organizations representing handicapped persons, to participate in the self-evaluation process by submitting comments (both oral and written).
( c ) The agency shall, until three years following the completion of the self-evaluation, maintain on file and make available for public inspection: ( 1 ) a description of areas examined and any problems identified, and
( 2 ) a description of any modifications made.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                           9,887
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  139,077
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     73,799
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               232,588
<PP&E>                                         204,884
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 561,851
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          180,336
<BONDS>                                        341,741
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     (7,601)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   561,851
<SALES>                                        112,594
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               112,594
<CGS>                                           91,991
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  103,079
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               7,506
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,389
<INCOME-TAX>                                       246
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,143
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,143
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 35.1

ANNUAL STATEMENT AS TO COMPLIANCE

OFFICERS CERTIFICATION



|Re: | CCRE Commercial Mortgage Securities, L.P.
|--- | -----------------------------------------

| | Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2011-C2
| | -------------------------------------------------------------

In connection with the above-referenced transaction the undersigned officer, on behalf of Bank of America, National Association, hereby certifies that (i) a review of the Servicing activities, for
the period ending December 31, 2011 and of its performance under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of December 11, 2011 has been made under my supervision, and (ii) to the best of my knowledge, based on such review, Bank of
America, National Association has fulfilled all of its obligations under this agreement in all material respects throughout the aforementioned period.

Bank of America, National Association



| |  |                       
| |  | ----------------------
| |  | /s/ Janice M. Smith   
| |  | Managing Director     
| | 
| |  | /s/ H. Michael Lumadue
| |  | Director
### §2739. Amounts recovered from third parties for loss or damage to personal property shipped or stored at Government expense: crediting to appropriations

(a) Crediting of Collections.—Any qualifying military department third-party collection shall be credited to the appropriate current appropriation. Amounts so credited shall be merged with the funds in that appropriation and shall be available for the same period and purposes as the funds with which merged.

(b) Appropriate Current Appropriation.—For purposes of subsection (a), the appropriate current appropriation with respect to a qualifying military department third-party collection is the appropriation currently available, as of the date of the collection, for the payment of claims by that military department for loss or damage of personal property shipped or stored at Government expense.

(c) Qualifying Military Department Third-Party Collections.—For purposes of subsection (a), a qualifying military department third-party collection is any amount that a military department collects under sections 3711, 3716, 3717, and 3721 of title 31 from a third party for a loss or damage to personal property that occurred during shipment or storage of the property at Government expense and for which the Secretary of the military department paid the owner in settlement of a claim.

(Added Pub. L. 105–261, div. A, title X, §1010(a)(1), Oct. 17, 1998, 112 Stat. 2117.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Pub. L. 105–261, div. A, title X, §1010(b), Oct. 17, 1998, 112 Stat. 2117, provided that: "Section 2739 of title 10, United States Code, as added by subsection (a), applies with respect to amounts collected by a military department on or after the date of the enactment of this Act [Oct. 17, 1998]."