alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §166. Combatant commands: budget proposals

(a) Combatant Command Budgets.—The Secretary of Defense shall include in the annual budget of the Department of Defense submitted to Congress a separate budget proposal for such activities of each of the unified and specified combatant commands as may be determined under subsection (b).

(b) Content of Proposals.—A budget proposal under subsection (a) for funding of activities of a combatant command shall include funding proposals for such activities of the combatant command as the Secretary (after consultation with the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff) determines to be appropriate for inclusion. Activities of a combatant command for which funding may be requested in such a proposal include the following:

(1) Joint exercises.

(2) Force training.

(3) Contingencies.

(4) Selected operations.

(c) SOF Training With Foreign Forces.—A funding proposal for force training under subsection (b)(2) may include amounts for training expense payments authorized in section 322 of this title.

(Added Pub. L. 99–433, title II, §211(a), Oct. 1, 1986, 100 Stat. 1016; amended Pub. L. 102–190, div. A, title X, §1052(b), Dec. 5, 1991, 105 Stat. 1471; Pub. L. 115–91, div. A, title X, §1081(a)(11), Dec. 12, 2017, 131 Stat. 1594.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2017—Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 115–91 substituted "section 322" for "section 2011".

1991—Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 102–190 added subsec. (c).

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Pub. L. 99–433, title II, §214(d), Oct. 1, 1986, 100 Stat. 1019, provided that: "Section 166 of title 10, United States Code (as added by section 211 of this Act), shall take effect with budget proposals for fiscal year 1989."
Exhibit 32.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Graham Packaging Holdings
Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Philip
R. Yates, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of Graham Packaging Holdings Company.

Date:  May 13, 2005


                             By: /s/ Philip R. Yates
                                -----------------------------------
                                Philip R. Yates
                                Chief Executive Officer




                                       1
<PAGE>
H. Res. 185

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

May 25, 1999.

Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule

XVIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee of the

Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of

the bill (H.R. 1906) making appropriations for Agriculture,

Rural Development, Food and Drug Administration, and Related Agencies for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2000,

and for other purposes. The first reading of the bill shall be

dispensed with. Points of order against consideration of the

bill for failure to comply with clause 4(a) of rule XIII or section 306 of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 are

waived. General debate shall be confined to the bill and shall

not exceed one hour equally divided and controlled by the

chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on

Appropriations. After general debate the bill shall be considered for amendment under the five-minute rule. Points of

order against provisions in the bill for failure to comply with

clause 2 of rule XXI are waived. During consideration of the
2

•HRES 185 EH

bill for amendment, the Chairman of the Committee of the

Whole may accord priority in recognition on the basis of

whether the Member offering an amendment has caused it to

be printed in the portion of the Congressional Record designated for that purpose in clause 8 of rule XVIII. Amendments so printed shall be considered as read. The Chairman

of the Committee of the Whole may: (1) postpone until a time

during further consideration in the Committee of the Whole

a request for a recorded vote on any amendment; and (2) reduce to five minutes the minimum time for electronic voting

on any postponed question that follows another electronic

vote without intervening business, provided that the minimum

time for electronic voting on the first in any series of questions shall be 15 minutes. At the conclusion of consideration

of the bill for amendment the Committee shall rise and report

the bill to the House with such amendments as may have

been adopted. The previous question shall be considered as

ordered on the bill and amendments thereto to final passage

without intervening motion except one motion to recommit

with or without instructions.

Attest:

Clerk.
Docket No: FAA-2015-1423 Dir ID: 2014-NM-173-AD
### Stratigraphy and structure of the Rainier and USGS Tunnel areas, Nevada Test Site

By: W. R. HansenR. W. LemkeJ. M. CattermoleA. B. Gibbons

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/pp382A

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 3**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 4**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 5**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 6**                            (pdf) 
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
### Geology and magnetite deposits of the Franklin quadrangle and part of the Hamburg quadrangle, New Jersey

By: Donald R. BakerA. F. Buddington

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/pp638

#### Links

- More information:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**                            (html)
-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf) 
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of SLM Student Loan Trust 2012-1 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);
 
 2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
 
 3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;
 
 4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer and administrator have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreement and administration agreement, as applicable, in all material respects; and
 
 5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K. In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated party: Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, as indenture trustee.
 
  
    /s/ SOMSAK CHIVAVIBUL
§ 169.120 What other types of payments are required for a right-of-way? ( a ) The grantee may be required to pay additional fees, taxes, and assessments associated with the application for use of the land or use of the land, as determined by entities having jurisdiction, except as provided in § 169.11. The grantee must pay these amounts to the appropriate office, as applicable.
( b ) In addition to, or as part of, the compensation for a right-of-way under §§ 169.110 and 169.112 and the payments provided for in paragraph (a) of this section, the applicant for a right-of-way will be required to pay for all damages to the land, such as those incident to the construction or maintenance of the facility for which the right-of-way is granted.
#### Nicholas Lougnot, as Administrator, etc., Respondent, v. Central New York Telegraph and Telephone Company, Appellant.

Judgment and order reversed *914■ and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide event. - Held, that the finding of the jury that plaintiff’s intestate was free from contributory negligence was contrary to and against the weight of the evidence. All concurred.
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Hometown Auto Retailers, Inc. (the
      "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2006 as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
      Corey E. Shaker, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.








/s/
      Corey E. Shaker


Corey
      E.
      Shaker


President
      and Chief Executive Officer


November
      10, 2006


41
#### Herman Staebler, Respondent, v. Josiah B. Tisdale, Appellant.

We think ,the verdict in this, case was clearly against' the weight of evidence. Judgment- and order of the County Court of Queens county reversed, and new trial ordered, costs to abide the event. . Woodward, Jenks,-Hooker, Gaynor and 'Rich, JJ.,. ■ concurred.
#### § 136.2 Construction costs.

The program of rehabilitation has now been completed at a cost of $419,186.52. This amount, chargeable on an equal per acre basis against 60,000 acres, amounts to a rate of $6.986 per acre, which rate is hereby determined to be the per acre cost to be repaid to the United States under the 1936 contracts.
#### Nathaniel Miller v. The State.

No. 22943.

Delivered November 8, 1944.

The opinion states the case.

*Edward Risinger,*of Rosenberg, for appellant.

*Ernest S. Goens,*State’s Attorney, of Austin, for the State.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

The conviction was for assault to murder, with a penalty of ten years in the penitentiary.

Appellant, a negro boy, was «engaged in a quarrel with another negro in the colored compartment of a cafe operated by the prosecuting witness. With a desire to free his premises of the noise, the proprietor approached the parties and told them that they would have to quiet down or leave the room. The appellant made a remark back to him, which was quoted by several witnesses including the State’s witness, that was in effect telling him that if he, appellant, had to leave the witness would have to go with him. This infuriated the white man who grabbed a broom and struck the appellant. The negro boy struck back at the witness with a small red handle knife which was open in his hand at the time, inflicting some kind or character of wound on the proprietor’s arm that kept him in the hospital for about three days and from which he has a permanent injury briefly referred to in his testimony but not described. The boy then ran from the premises. The State used no other witness *582than the injured party and the foregoing is a full, fair and complete resume of the pertinent facts proven.

The knife described is not a .deadly weapon per se. Fregia v. State 185 S. W. 11. There is no evidence to warrant a finding that appellant intended to kill N. A. Bushnell. as charged in the indictment. Hare v. State, 80 S. W. (2d) 963, 128 T. C. R. 203; Brown v. State 122 S. W. (2d) 308; McMurrey v. State 168 S. W. (2d) 858; Branch’s P. C. Sections 1636 and 1639.

The judgment of the trial court is reversed and the cause is remanded.
#### § 20.203 Can a tribe incorporate assistance from other sources into a tribal redesign plan?

Yes, when a tribe redesigns its general assistance program, it may include assistance from other sources (such as Public Law 102-477 federal funding sources) in the plan.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Angel Maldonado, Appellant.

[823 NYS2d 529]

*498Appeal by the defendant, by permission, from an order of the County Court, Suffolk County (Gazzillo, J.), dated August 24, 2004, which denied, without a hearing, his motion pursuant to CPL 440.10 to vacate a judgment of conviction of the same court rendered April 25, 2003, convicting him of scheme to defraud in the first degree, grand larceny in the third degree (three counts), attempted petit larceny, tampering with physical evidence, compounding a crime, coercion in the second degree, bribing a witness, tampering with a witness in the fourth degree, criminal impersonation in the second degree (three counts), harassment in the second degree, and aggravated harassment in the second degree (three counts), upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the order is affirmed.

Pursuant to CPL 440.10 (2) (c), a motion to vacate a judgment of conviction must be denied when, although sufficient facts appear on the record to have permitted adequate review, the defendant unjustifiably failed to raise the issue on his direct appeal. On the defendant’s direct appeal, he argued, inter alia, that the court erred in sentencing him to an enhanced sentence without allowing him to vacate his plea of guilt. However, this Court declined to review that unpreserved contention (see *People v Maldonado,*21 AD3d 430 [2005]). The same record clearly presented sufficient facts from which the defendant could have raised his present claims, inter aha, that his counsel at sentencing was ineffective, that the New York court lacked jurisdiction, and that there was prosecutorial misconduct before the grand jury. Since these issues could have been raised on direct appeal, they could not properly be raised on the CPL 440.10 motion *(see People v Jossiah, 2*AD3d 877 [2003]; *People v Smith,*269 AD2d 769 [2000]). Florio, J.R, Schmidt, Krausman and Lifson, JJ., concur.
H. Res. 322

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

October 5, 1999.

Whereas on September 16, 1999, Hurricane Floyd deposited

up to 18 inches of rain on sections of North Carolina

only days after the damaging rains of Hurricane Dennis;

Whereas Hurricane Floyd continued up the eastern seaboard,

causing flooding and tornadoes in Virginia, Maryland,

Pennsylvania, New Jersey, New York, and Connecticut;

Whereas Hurricane Floyd is responsible for 66 known deaths,

including 48 confirmed dead in North Carolina alone, as

well as three in New Jersey, two in New York, six in

Pennsylvania, four in Virginia, two in Delaware, and one

in Vermont;

Whereas hundreds of roads along the eastern seaboard remain closed as a result of damage caused by Hurricane

Floyd;

Whereas waters contaminated by millions of gallons of bacteria, raw sewage, and animal waste have flowed into

homes, businesses, and drinking water supplies due to

septic, pipeline, and water treatment system damage

caused by the flooding associated with Hurricane Floyd,

a situation that poses considerable health risks for individuals and families in affected States;
2

•HRES 322 EH

Whereas areas in 10 States were declared Federal disaster

areas as a result of Hurricane Floyd—Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Maryland, New Jersey, New York, North

Carolina, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, and Virginia;

Whereas individuals registering for Federal assistance in

States hit by Hurricane Floyd totalled 68,440 as of September 26, 1999, with 39,265 in North Carolina, 11,121

in New Jersey, 4,582 in New York, 3,222 in South Carolina, 3,153 in Virginia, 371 in Delaware, 6,479 in Pennsylvania, 173 in Connecticut, and 74 in Maryland;

Whereas thousands of individuals and families have been displaced from their homes and are now taking refuge in

temporary housing or shelters;

Whereas over $2 million in temporary housing grants have

been issued in New York and New Jersey and the residential loss estimates are over $80 million in North Carolina alone; and

Whereas the nature of this disaster deserves the immediate

attention and support of the Federal Government: Now,

therefore, be it

Resolved, That the House of Representatives—

(1) expresses its deepest sympathies to everyone

who suffered as a result of Hurricane Floyd; and

(2) pledges its support to continue to work on their

behalf to restore normalcy to their lives and to renew
3

•HRES 322 EH

their spirits by helping them recover, rebuild, and reconstruct.

Attest:

Clerk.
#### John D. Broderick, Respondent, v. The Delaware, Lackawanna and Western Railroad Company, Appellant.

Judgment and order reversed and new trial granted, with costs to appellant to abide event, upon the ground that the finding of the jury that the plaintiff was free from contributory negligence is against the weight of evidence. All concurred, except Cochrane, J., dissenting; Sewell, J., not sitting.
2016 Annual Statement of Servicer Compliance
(Item 1123)





Pooling and Servicing Agreement (the “Pooling
and Servicing Agreement”) dated as of December 1, 2011 by and among Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Securities, Inc. as Depositor,
Wells Fargo Bank, National Association as Master Servicer, Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC as successor Special Servicer to Midland
Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association, Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas as Trustee, Certificate Administrator,
Paying Agent and Custodian, and TriMont Real Estate Advisors, Inc. as Operating Advisor, as amended, relating to the UBS-Citigroup
Commercial Mortgage Trust 2011-C1 Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2011-C1 (UBS-Citigroup 2011-C1).



The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Rialto Capital Advisors,
LLC, as special servicer (the “Special Servicer”) herein certifies to the following:



| | 1. | All servicing activities and performance of such servicing activities under the Pooling and Servicing
Agreement are performed on behalf of the Special Servicer.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | A review of the servicing activities and performance by the Special Servicer for the period of
January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2016 (the “Reporting Period”) under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement has been conducted
under my supervision.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 3. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Special Servicer has fulfilled all of
its obligations under the terms of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, in all material respects for the Reporting Period and if
there has been a failure to fulfill any such obligations in any material respect, each failure and the nature and status thereof
has been specifically identified herein.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------









|Certified by: | /s/ Adam Singer                |  | Date:  March 1, 2017
|------------- | ------------------------------ |  | --------------------
|              | Adam Singer, Managing Director |  |