alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §18235. Administration; other use permitted by Secretary

(a) The Secretary of Defense, after consulting the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate and the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives on matters of policy, may—

(1) administer, operate, maintain, and equip facilities constructed, expanded, rehabilitated, or converted under section 18233 of this title or otherwise acquired and used for the purposes of this chapter;

(2) permit persons or organizations other than members and units of the armed forces to use those facilities under such leases or other agreements as he considers appropriate; and

(3) cover the payments received under those leases or agreements into the Treasury to the credit of the appropriation from which the cost of maintaining the facility, including its utilities and services, is paid.

(b) The Secretary may not permit any use or disposition to be made of a facility covered by subsection (a) that would interfere with its use—

(1) for administering and training the reserve components of the armed forces; or

(2) in time of war or national emergency, by other units of the armed forces or by the United States for any other purpose.

(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 122, §2235; renumbered §18235 and amended Pub. L. 103–337, div. A, title XVI, §1664(b)(2), (7), Oct. 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 3010; Pub. L. 104–106, div. A, title XV, §1502(a)(2), Feb. 10, 1996, 110 Stat. 502; Pub. L. 106–65, div. A, title X, §1067(1), Oct. 5, 1999, 113 Stat. 774.)

| Revised section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2235(a) | 50:883(c) (less 1st sentence, and less last 70 words of last sentence). | Sept. 11, 1950, ch. 945, §4(c) (less 1st sentence), 64 Stat. 830. |
| 2235(b) | 50:883(c) (last 70 words of last sentence). | |

In subsection (a), the words "from time to time" and "or appropriations" are omitted as surplusage.

In subsection (b), the words "United States" are substituted for the words "Federal Government". The words "units of" are omitted as surplusage. The words "may not" are substituted for the words "shall at no time".

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1999—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 106–65 substituted "and the Committee on Armed Services" for "and the Committee on National Security" in introductory provisions.

1996—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 104–106 substituted "Committee on Armed Services of the Senate and the Committee on National Security of the House of Representatives" for "Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives".

1994—Pub. L. 103–337, §1664(b)(2), renumbered section 2235 of this title as this section.

Subsec. (a)(1). Pub. L. 103–337, §1664(b)(7), substituted "18233" for "2233(a)(1)".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1994 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 103–337 effective Dec. 1, 1994, except as otherwise provided, see section 1691 of Pub. L. 103–337, set out as an Effective Date note under section 10001 of this title.
§ 161.203 Are range management plans required? Yes. BIA will: ( a ) Consult with the Navajo Nation in planning conservation practices, including grazing control and range restoration activities for the Navajo Partitioned Lands.
( b ) Develop range management plans with the concurrence of the Navajo Nation.
( c ) Approve the range management plans, after concurrence with the Navajo Nation, and the implementation of the plan may begin immediately. The plan will address, but is not limited to, the following issues: ( 1 ) Goals for improving vegetative productivity and diversity;
( 2 ) Stocking rates;
( 3 ) Grazing schedules;
( 4 ) Wildlife management;
( 5 ) Needs assessment for range and livestock improvements;
( 6 ) Schedule for operation and maintenance of existing range improvements and development for cooperative funded projects;
( 7 ) Cooperation in the implementation of range studies;
( 8 ) Control of livestock diseases and parasites;
( 9 ) Fencing or other structures necessary to implement any of the other provisions in the range management plan;
( 10 ) Special land uses; and
( 11 ) Water development and management.
#### George W. Tower and Others, Respondents, v. Rose Frey and Others, Appellants, Impleaded with Hannah Vera Frey and Others.

Judgment modified *925by striking out provisions as to costs, and as modified affirmed, without costs. No opinion.' (Clarke, J., dissenting.) Settle order on notice.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997             DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997             JUN-28-1998
<CASH>                                               0                       0
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0                       0
<PP&E>                                               0                       0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0                       0
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                             0                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0                       0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0                       0
<SALES>                                              0                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0                       0
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0                       0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0                       0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0                       0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.00                    0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00                    0.00
        

</TABLE>
# U nit edSta tes C ou rt o f App eal s For t h e Firs t C ircu it
Nos. 03-1809, 05-1474 IN RE: INDIAN MOTOCYCLE COMPANY, INC.; INDIAN MOTOCYCLE APPAREL AND ACCESSORIES COMPANY, INC.; INDIAN MOTOCYCLE MANUFACTURING COMPANY, INC.; The Receivership Estate of INDIAN MOTOCYCLE MANUFACTURING, INC., Debtors.

__________ STERLING CONSULTING CORPORATION, Receiver,

Plaintiff, Appellee,

v. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, Defendant, Appellant, STEPHEN M. RODOLAKIS, Trustee,

Defendant.

____________________ No. 03-2210 STERLING CONSULTING CORPORATION, Receiver, Plaintiff, Appellee,

v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Claimant, Appellant, STEPHEN M. RODOLAKIS, Trustee; MICHAEL MANDELMAN, Defendants.

____________________ERRATA

The opinion of this court issued on June 23, 2006, is amended as follows: On page 5, lines 7-8: replace "June 6, 2000" with "June 6, 2003". On page 11, line 16: replace "note 1," with "note 2,".
EXHIBIT 31.1 -- Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to
                Section 302 of the Sorbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

                           CERTIFICATION

I, Robert Kamon, Secretary, and Chief Financial Officer certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Australian-
Canadian Oil Royalties Ltd.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this quarterly report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and I have:

  (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
  information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
  subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
  particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being
  prepared;

  (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
  procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
  quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

  (c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
  effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
  evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing
equivalent function):

  (a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
  controls that could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
  process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
  registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

  (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
  employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls;
  and

6. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal
controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date:  May 13, 2004

/s/ Robert Kamon
-------------------------------------
Robert Kamon
Secretary and Chief Financial Officer
#### § 173.19 Improvements.

Title to improvements constructed on the premises by the permittee shall be fixed and determined by the terms of the permit.
§ 162.580 What is the approval process for a sublease of a WSR lease? ( a ) When we receive a sublease that meets the requirements of this subpart, we will notify the parties of the date we receive it. If our approval is required, we have 30 days from receipt of the executed sublease, proof of required consents, and required documentation to approve or disapprove the sublease or inform the parties to the sublease and Indian landowners in writing that we need additional review time. Our determination whether to approve the sublease will be in writing and will state the basis for our approval or disapproval.
( b ) Our letter informing parties that we need additional review time must identify our initial concerns and invite the parties to respond within 15 days of the date of the letter. We have 30 days from sending the letter informing the parties that we need additional time to approve or disapprove the sublease.
( c ) If we do not meet the deadline in paragraph (a) of this section, or paragraph (b) of this section if applicable, the sublease is deemed approved to the extent consistent with Federal law. Unless the lease provides otherwise, provisions of the sublease that are inconsistent with Federal law will be severed and unenforceable; all other provisions of the sublease will remain in force.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 212 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 212

 Expressing hope for a peaceful resolution to the situation in Kashmir.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 16, 1999

Mr. Blagojevich submitted the following resolution; which was referred 
              to the Committee on International Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Expressing hope for a peaceful resolution to the situation in Kashmir.

Whereas the current crisis between India and Pakistan poses a clear threat to 
        international peace and security;
Whereas the nuclear weapons capability of both India and Pakistan makes it 
        essential that this crisis be resolved quickly in a peaceful fashion;
Whereas India and Pakistan had recently made great strides in promoting dialog 
        and improved relations;
Whereas significant questions remain about how the insurgents are being trained 
        and supplied; and
Whereas the Simla Agreement provides the outline for the resolution of the 
        situation in Jammu and Kashmir: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved,

SECTION 1. DECLARATION OF POLICY.

    The House of Representatives--
            (1) reaffirms the right of India and Pakistan to provide 
        for their own domestic security;
            (2) reaffirms that the Line of Control must not be changed 
        through the use of force; and
            (3) commends the restraint shown by Indian Security forces 
        in dealing with the armed insurgency.

SEC. 2. SENSE OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES.

    It is the sense of the House of Representatives that--
            (1) all intruding forces from across the Line of Control 
        should withdraw from the Indian side; and
            (2) the letter and spirit of the Lahore Declaration should 
        be respected by all parties, namely that--
                    (A) both governments shall refrain from 
                intervention and interference in each other's internal 
                affairs; and
                    (B) both governments reaffirm their condemnation of 
                terrorism in all its forms and manifestations and their 
                determination to combat this menace.
                                 <all>
```
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 13**  **- 6506** 

TERRENCE GIBBS ,
P etitioner

- Appellant ,

v.

ERIC WILSON , Respondent

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at N orfolk

. Raymond A. Jackson , District Judge. ( 2 :12

- cv
- 00 128

- RAJ

- DEM )

Submitted : June 20, 2013 Decided: June 26, 2013

Before GREGORY, DUNCAN, and DAVIS , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Terrence Gibbs , Appellant Pro Se. Joel Eric Wilson, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk , Virginia , for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Terrence Gibbs , a federal prisoner, appeals the

district court ’ s order accepting the recommendation of the
magistrate judge a nd denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. A. § 2241
(West 2006 & Supp. 2012) petition. We have reviewed the record
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant
leave to proceed in forma paupe ris, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. Gibbs v . Wilson , No. 2:12

- cv
00128

- RAJ

- DEM (E.D. Va. Dec. 17, 2012) . We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### Erenest M. Burrows v. The Sarony Company.

Motion denied, with ten dollars costs.
§ 171.565 How will I know if BIA plans to adjust my annual operation and maintenance assessment rate? ( a ) We provide public notice of our proposed rates annually in the Federal Register.
( b ) You may contact the irrigation facility servicing your farm unit.
#### Joshua T. Fanning and Mary F. Fanning, Respondents, v. Edgar Lehman, Appellant.

Judgment affirmed, with costs, on the authority of *Downs*v. *Lehman (ante,*p. 11), decided herewith-. " Jenks, Hooker, Gaynor, Rich and Miller, JJ,, concurred.
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 34 (Friday, February 18, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 9636]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-3656]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Office of Thrift Supervision

[AC-59: OTS No. H-4761]


Franklin Financial Corporation, Inc., Glen Allen, VA; Approval of 
Conversion Application

    Notice is hereby given that on February 11, 2011, the Office of 
Thrift Supervision approved the application of Franklin Financial 
Corporation MHC and Franklin Federal Savings Bank, Glen Allen, 
Virginia, to convert to the stock form of organization. Copies of the 
application are available for inspection by appointment (phone number: 
202-906-5922 or e-mail <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#702005121c19135e391e161f303f24235e24021511035e171f06"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="174762757b7e74395e7971785758434439436572766439707861">[email protected]</span></a>) at the Public Reading 
Room, 1700 G Street, NW., Washington, DC 20552, and the OTS Southeast 
Regional Office, 1475 Peachtree Street, NE., Atlanta, Georgia 30309.

    Dated: February 11, 2011.

    By the Office of Thrift Supervision.
Sandra E. Evans,
Federal Register Liaison.
[FR Doc. 2011-3656 Filed 2-17-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6720-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit
32.1

CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of OMI
Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending September 30,
2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Report), I, Craig H. Stevenson, Jr., Chairman and Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my
knowledge:

| |    |                                                                                                                                                        
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | 1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
  section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                
| |    |                                                                                                                                                        
| | 2) | The information contained in the Report fairly
  presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of
  operations of the Company.

|      |                  |                                                                                 |     |  |                            
|----- | ---------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --- |  | ---------------------------
|Date: | November 9, 2006 |                                                                                 | By: |  | /s/ Craig H. Stevenson, Jr.
|      |                  |                                                                                 |     |  |                            
|      |                  | Craig H. Stevenson, Jr. 
  Chairman of the Board and 
  Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this statement required by
Section 906 has been provided to OMI Corporation and will be retained by OMI
Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
Staff upon request.

---
EXHIBIT 31.4



CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL
OFFICER

PURSUANT TO EXCHANGE ACT RULES 13a-14(a)
AND 15d-14(a),

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002



I, James Parslow, certify that:



| | 1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the annual report on Form 10-K of Xenetic Biosciences, Inc.; and
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with
respect to the period covered by this report.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: April 30, 2019





|By: | /s/ James Parslow                                             
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------
|    | James Parslow                                                 
|    | Chief Financial Officer                                       
|    | (Principal Financial
Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)
§ 162.558 What other types of payments are required under a WSR lease? ( a ) The lessee may be required to pay additional fees, taxes, and assessments associated with the use of the land, as determined by entities having jurisdiction, except as provided in § 162.017. The lessee must pay these amounts to the appropriate office.
( b ) If the leased premises are within an Indian irrigation project or drainage district, except as otherwise provided in part 171 of this chapter, the lessee must pay all operation and maintenance charges that accrue during the lease term. The lessee must pay these amounts to the appropriate office in charge of the irrigation project or drainage district. We will treat failure to make these payments as a violation of the lease.
( c ) Where the property is subject to at least one other lease for another compatible use, such as grazing, the lessees may agree among themselves how to allocate payment of the operation and maintenance charges.
§ 171.535 Why is BIA collecting this information from me? ( a ) As part of doing business with you, we must collect enough information from you to properly bill and service your account.
( b ) We are required to collect your taxpayer identifying number under the authority of, and as prescribed in, the Debt Collection Improvement Act of 1996, Public Law 104-134 (110 Stat. 1321-364).