alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
4:

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of SkyLynx Communications, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended December 31, 2005, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), we,
Gary L. Brown, President and Acting Chief Financial Officer and K. Bryan Shobe,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
      and                              
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     |                                                                                                                                                                
| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
      of the Company.

/s/ Gary L.
Brown

/s/ K. Bryan
Shobe                              K.
Bryan Shobe, Chief Executive OfficerMay 22, 2006
#### E. Haydon BOZELL, Appellant, v. Henry M. LINDSAY, Supt. District Reformatory, et al., Appellees.

No. 6832.

United States Court of Appeals Fourth Circuit.

Argued Oct. 12, 1954.

Decided Oct. 14, 1954.

Charles A. Somma, Richmond, Va. [Court appointed counsel] (E. Haydon Bozell, pro se, on brief), for appellant.

Edwin J. Slipek, Asst. U. S. Atty., Richmond, Va. (L. S. Parsons, Jr., U. S. Atty., Norfolk, Va., and R. R. Ryder, Asst. U. S. Atty., Richmond, Va., on brief), for appellee.

Before PARKER, Chief Judge, DOBIE, Circuit Judge, and BOREMAN, District Judge.

PER CURIAM.

This is another appeal in a habeas corpus case by a prisoner who in 1949 was convicted in the District of Columbia under four counts of an indictment which charged him with using the mails to defraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1341. His conviction was affirmed by the United States Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia. 85 U.S.App.D.C. 420, 174 F.2d 672, certiorari denied 341 U.S. 927, 71 S.Ct. 792, 95 L.Ed. 1358. In 1952 we denied a petition by him to review the action of the Parole Board in denying him parole. 4 Cir., 199 F.2d 449. In 1953 he appealed to us from an order denying an application for habeas corpus, and we affirmed that order and denied a petition for rehearing, not only on the ground that it did not appear that the remedy afforded by 28 U.S.C. § 2253 was inadequate or ineffective to test the legality of petitioner’s detention, but also on the ground that habeas corpus may not be used in lieu of appeal for the purpose of correcting errors alleged to have been committed in the course of a trial, Bozell v. Welch, 4 Cir., 203 F.2d 711. The denial of the application in this case was proper on the same grounds.

Affirmed.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsPreparation and Single-Crystal X-Ray Structures of Four Related Mixed-Ligand 4-Methylpyridine Indium Halide ComplexesWe describe the structures of four related indium complexes obtained during synthesis of solid-state materials precursors. Indium adducts of halides and 4-methylpyridine, InX3(pic)3 (X = Cl, Br; pic = 4-methylpyridine) consist of octahedral molecules with meridional (mer) geometry. Crystals of mer-InCl3(pic)3 (1) are triclinic, space group P1(bar) (No. 2), with a = 9.3240(3), b = 13.9580(6), c = 16.7268 (7) A, alpha = 84.323(2), beta = 80.938(2), gamma = 78.274(3)Z = 4, R = 0.035 for 8820 unique reflections. Crystals of mer-InBr3(pic)3 (2) are monoclinic, space group P21/n (No. 14), with a = 15.010(2), b = 19.938(2), c = 16.593(3), beta = 116.44(1)Z = 8, R = 0.053 for 4174 unique reflections. The synthesis and structures of related compounds with phenylsulfide (chloride) (3) and a dimeric complex with bridging hydroxide (bromide) (4) coordination is also described. Crystals of trans-In(SC6H5)Cl2(pic)3 (3) are monoclinic, space group P21/n (No. 14), with a = 9.5265(2), b = 17.8729(6), c = 13.8296(4), beta = 99.7640(15)Z = 4, R = 0.048 for 5511 unique reflections. Crystals of [In(mu-OH)Br2(pic)22 (4) are tetragonal, space group = I41cd (No. 110) with a = 19.8560(4), b = 19.8560(4), c = 25.9528(6), Z = 8, R = 0.039 for 5982 unique reflections.Document ID20130011563Acquisition SourceGlenn Research CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsHepp, Aloysius F.*(NASA Glenn Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)*Clark, Eric B.*(NASA Glenn Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)*Schupp, John D.*(Tiffin Univ. Tiffin, OH, United States)*Williams, Jennifer N.*(Cleveland State Univ. Cleveland, OH, United States)*Duraj, Stan A.*(Cleveland State Univ. Cleveland, OH, United States)*Fanwick, Philip E.*(Purdue Univ. West Lafayette, IN, United States)*Date AcquiredAugust 27, 2013Publication DateFebruary 1, 2013Subject CategoryInorganic, Organic And Physical ChemistryReport/Patent NumberE-18621NASA/TM-2013-217845Funding Number(s)WBS: WBS 473452.02.03.06.07.01Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightPublic Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType20130011563.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 39 (Monday, February 28, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 10936-10937]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-3974]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Office of the Secretary

Aviation Proceedings, Agreements Filed the Week Ending January 
29, 2011

    The following Agreements were filed with the Department of 
Transportation under the Sections 412 and 414 of the Federal Aviation 
Act, as amended (49 U.S.C. 1382 and 1384) and procedures governing 
proceedings to enforce these provisions. Answers may be filed within 21 
days after the filing of the application.

    Docket Number: DOT-OST-2011-0013.
    Date Filed: January 25, 2011.
    Parties: Members of the International Air Transport Association.
    Subject: Mail Vote 657TC3 Special Passenger Amending Resolution 
010j Special Passenger Amending Resolution between Japan and China 
(excluding Hong Kong SAR and Macao SAR) (Memo 1413). Intended effective 
date: 21 January 2011.

    Docket Number: DOT-OST-2011-0014.
    Date Filed: January 25, 2011.
    Parties: Members of the International Air Transport Association.
    Subject: Mail Vote 658TC3 Special Passenger Amending Resolution 
010k Special Passenger Amending Resolution

[[Page 10937]]

between Brunei Darussalam and Malaysia (Memo 1414). Intended effective 
date: 1 February 2011.

    Docket Number: DOT-OST-2011-0015.
    Date Filed: January 24, 2011.
    Parties: Members of the International Air Transport Association.
    Subject: Mail Vote 632--Flex Fares ResolutionsTC1 Caribbean, 
Longhaul, Within South America-Tariffs, 8-17 March 2010 (Memo 0395). r1 
041ee. Intended effective date: for travel on/after 1 July 2010.

Renee V. Wright,
Program Manager, Docket Operations, Federal Register Liaison.
[FR Doc. 2011-3974 Filed 2-25-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-9X-P
```
§ 171.525 How do I pay my bill? ( a ) You can pay your bill by: ( 1 ) Personally going to the local office of the irrigation facility authorized to receive your payment during normal business hours;
( 2 ) Depositing your payment in an authorized drop box, if available, at the local office of the irrigation facility; or
( 3 ) Mailing your payment to the address indicated on your bill.
( b ) Your payment must be in the form of: ( 1 ) Check or money order in the mail or authorized drop box; or
( 2 ) Cash, check, or money order if you pay in person.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

# Science and Technology Conference strengthen interoperability

By Sgt. Charlene MolerUS Pacific Command Public Affairs

                HONOLULU, Hawaii  –              

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

pacom

news

articles
§ 161.713 How will BIA determine the amount of damages to Navajo Partitioned Lands? ( a ) BIA will determine the damages by considering the costs of rehabilitation and re-vegetation, loss of future revenue, loss of profits, loss of productivity, loss of market value, damage to other resources, and other factors.
( b ) BIA will determine the value of forage or crops consumed or destroyed based upon the average rate received per month for comparable property or grazing privileges, or the estimated commercial value or replacement costs of the products or property.
( c ) BIA will determine the value of the products or property illegally used or removed based upon a valuation of similar products or property.
§ 2.825 When does the Statement of Performance or a Decision become final? ( a ) Statements of Performance, and decisions rendered by Department officials under this subpart, are final when the deadline for submitting an Objection to the Statement of Performance or an Appeal has expired and the account holder has not submitted an Objection to the Statement of Performance or an Appeal.
( b ) A decision rendered by the AS-IA is a final agency action.
1

MEMORANDUM 

DATE: May 11, 2011

TO: Melanie King, EPA OAQPS/SPPD/ESG

FROM: Tanya Parise, EC/R, Inc.

SUBJECT: Summary of Calls with Vendors of Diesel Particulate Filters (DPF) 

The purpose of this memorandum is to present a summary of information obtained during 

calls with vendors of diesel particulate filters (DPF) for stationary diesel engines. Below is a 

summary of the April 4, 2011 discussion with Scott McBryde of Miratech and April 5, 2011

discussion with Jim McDonald of Rypos.

Miratech

Scott McBryde of Miratech conservatively estimated that DPF cleaning for ash 

accumulation would occur every 2,000 to 2,500 hours of operation, or roughly three times per 

year. The estimated frequency of cleanings was based on assuming that a low ash lube oil is 

being used. The Miratech DPF system consists of 9 blocks, in a 3" x 3" array for a 200 kilowatt 

(KW) (268 horsepower (HP)). The DPF could be cleaned on-site by vacuuming or blowing out 

the ash, Scott explained. It would take 1 day or less to do the cleaning and the cleaning would

not require a skilled technician, according to Scott.

Rypos

Jim McDonald of Rypos indicated that for engines in the 117 KW to 372 KW (157 HP to 

499 HP) size range, the capital cost of the Rypos DPF system is approximately $12,000 to 

$18,000) and the system is an active DPF system. It has a wire mesh filter, and it is continuously

regenerated with a current that is run from the engine. According to Jim, the DPF should still 

achieve the desired reductions even at lower exhaust temperatures. The DPF can tolerate up to 

500 parts per million sulfur fuel, but there could be issues if the fuel has used oil blended into it, 

Jim said. In terms of the maintenance, the ash that drops to the bottom would have to be 

vacuumed out approximately once a year. This can be done by the engine operator with a shop 

vac. In response to the Alaska concerns about the engine shutting down if there is a problem 

with the DPF, there is a system available that is used for fire pump engines that could be used, 

where the engine would continue to operate even if there was a problem with the DPF. Jim 

noted that the operator could install a timer that would lead to engine shutdown if the problem is

not fixed in a certain period of time.

E C/R Incorporated Providing Environmental Technical Support Since 1989
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 23

- 6101

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. DEMETRIUS DWAYNE SWINTON, a/k/a Meat, a/k/a Million Dolla Meat , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Beaufort

. Richard Mark Gergel , District Judge. ( 9:17

- cr - 00945

- RMG

- 1 ; 9:20

- cv - 02170

- RMG )

Submitted : April 20, 2023 Decided: April 25, 2023

Before KING and QUATTLEBAUM , Circuit Judges , and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Demetrius Dwayne Swinton, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 23-6101 Doc: 3 Filed: 04/25/2023 Pg: 1 of 22 PER CURIAM: Demetrius Dwayne Swinton seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was not timely filed.
When the United St ates or its officer or agency is a party in a civil case , the notice of appeal must be filed no more than 60 days after the entry of the district court’s final judgment or order, Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(B), unless the district court extends the appeal peri od under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5) or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). “[T]he timely filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional requirement.” Bowles v. Russell , 551 U.S. 205, 214 (2007).
The district court ente red its order on April 27, 2022

. Swinton filed t he notice of appeal on January 17, 2023

. * Because Swinton failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we deny Swinton’s motion for a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal

. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentio ns are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED

* For the purpose of this appeal, we assume that the earliest date appearing on t he notice of appeal is the earliest date Swinton could have delivered the notice to prison officials for mailing to the court. Fed. R. App. P. 4(c) (1) ; Houston v. Lack , 487 U.S. 266 , 276 (1988). USCA4 Appeal: 23-6101 Doc: 3 Filed: 04/25/2023 Pg: 2 of 2
Exhibit 31.1



CERTIFICATIONS



I, Paul C. Honda, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports
on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Honda Auto Receivables 2012-1
Owner Trust (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);



2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports,
taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing
and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange
Act periodic reports;



4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by
the servicer and based on my knowledge and the compliance review conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required
in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has
fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and



5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing
criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria
for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act
Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material
instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.



In giving the certifications above, I have
reasonably relied on information provided to me by the unaffiliated party The Bank of New York Mellon.



Date: June 10, 2015



|/s/ Paul C. Honda                                    | 
|---------------------------------------------------- | 
|Paul C. Honda                                        | 
|Vice President and Assistant Secretary               | 
|of American Honda Finance Corporation                | 
|(senior officer in charge of the servicing function) |
### §2738. Property loss: reimbursement of members for certain losses of household effects caused by hostile action

(a) Authority To Reimburse.—The Secretary concerned may reimburse a member of the armed forces in an amount not more than $100,000 for a loss described in subsection (b).

(b) Covered Losses.—This section applies with respect to a loss of household effects sustained during a move made incident to a change of permanent station when, as determined by the Secretary, the loss was caused by a hostile action incident to war or a warlike action by a military force.

(c) Limitation.—The Secretary may provide reimbursement under this section for a loss described in subsection (b) only to the extent that the loss is not reimbursed under insurance or under the authority of another provision of law.

(d) Applicability of Other Authorities and Requirements.—Subsections (b), (d), (e), (f), and (g) of section 2733 of this title shall apply to a request for a reimbursement under this section as if the request were a claim against the United States.

(Added Pub. L. 103–337, div. A, title V, §557(a), Oct. 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 2775.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Pub. L. 103–337, div. A, title V, §557(c), Oct. 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 2776, provided that:

"(1) Section 2738 of title 10, United States Code, as added by subsection (a), applies with respect to losses incurred after June 30, 1990.

"(2) In the case of a loss incurred after June 30, 1990, and before the date of the enactment of this Act [Oct. 5, 1994], a request for reimbursement shall be filed with the Secretary of the military department concerned not later than two years after such date of enactment."
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News

US, Philippines Partner with Allies During Exercise Sama Sama 2023 October 2, 2023 — The U.S. Navy, U.S. Marine Corps, Armed Forces of the Philippines joined allies to commence the seventh iteration of exercise Sama Sama in the city of Manila, Philippines, October Oct. 2nd... MORE 

----

Pacific Partnership 2023 Concludes Second Stop in PhilippinesAugust 31, 2023 — Pacific Partnership has concluded its mission stop in San Fernando, August 30, at a closing ceremony hosted by provincial leadership at La Union High School... MORE 

----

2024 (327)2023 (825)2022 (1193)2021 (1066)2020 (1083)2019 (1166)2018 (1116)2017 (1356)2016 (1475)2015 (1408)2014 (904)2013 (32)2012 (4)

About DoDDoD CareersJoin the MilitaryNewsUSA.govPhotos & VideosPrivacy & SecurityTop Issues

US INDOPACOM Inspector GeneralDoD Inspector General Accessibility/Section 508DoD FOIAUS INDOPACOM FOIALink DisclaimerNo FEAR ActRecovery ActINDOPACOM Webmaster

                  - Facebook
                  - X
                  - YouTube
                  - Instagram
                  - RSS

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
#### § 2.710 When will the reviewing official decide a Tribal representative recognition appeal?

The reviewing official will issue a written decision, including the basis for the decision, within 30 days after the latest of the filing of your statement of reasons or interested parties' response.