alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Brian C Malone

9290 Jerry Acres Lane

Jacksonville, FL 32220

904-509-8914

gmhorse@gmail.com

Dear Sir or Madam:

This petition is being submitted on my behalf without legal counsel or consulting 

services.

Pursuant to Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (the Reform 

Act), and 14 C.F.R. Part 11, Brian C. Malone, a freelance multimedia producer, hereby 

applies for an exemption from the Federal Aviation Regulations (FARs) listed below to 

allow operation of our Small Unmanned Aircraft System (sUAS) commercially in 

airspace regulated by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) so long as such 

operations are conducted with and under the conditions outlined herein or as may be 

established by the FAA as required by Section 333.

The requested exemption would permit Brian C. Malone to pursue his commercial 

interests in providing services to clients using a small advanced sUAV in the following 

areas: Real Estate, Marketing, Land Management/Surveying, Agricultural Surveying, 

Special Events, Cinematography, Photography, and Search/Rescue. Brian Malone states 

that all sUAS flights will occur over private or controlled access property and will do so 

with the property owner's consent and knowledge and that only people who have 

consented or otherwise have agreed to be within the UAS’ radius during filming and 

photography applications.

Brian Malone has demonstrated the ability to safely and effectively fly the sUAS DJI 

Inspire 1 and DJI Phantom which will be used for all commercial and private purposes. 

Brian Malone complies with local ordinances and laws regarding the operation of sUAS, 

and adheres to all weather and environmental restrictions or limitations in reference to the 

operations of sUAS.

All flights will occur in ordinance with any state or local laws regarding privacy.

I, Brian C. Malone, am seeking the exemption because I am committed to complying 

with all of the rules, guidelines, limitations, and future legislation set forth by the FAA. I 

agree to operate the sUAS in the manner that I have described, and for the purposes that I 

have described. Without the exemption request granted, I would be unable to safely and 

effectively run my business, and it is my intention to comply with the FAA and obtain an 

exemption of the following regulations.
The following contains my list of regulations from which I am seeking exemption, and a 

complete list of responsibilities I assume as operator; it also contains information 

regarding the aircraft, public benefit and safety features, and similar petitions requests 

granted.

Regulations from which exemption is requested:

14 C.F.R. Part 21

14 C.F.R. 45.23(b)

14 C.F.R. 61.113(a) & (b) 14 C.F.R. 91.7(a)

14 C.F.R. 91.9(b) (2)

14 C.F.R. 91.109

14 C.F.R. 91.119

14 C.F.R. 91.121
§ 304.24 Appeals from denials of requests for access to records. ( a ) *Appeals.* If you are dissatisfied with the response to your request, you may appeal an adverse determination denying your request, in any respect, to the Chairman of the agency. You must make your appeal in writing, by e-mail or letter, and it must be received by the agency within 60 days of the date of the denial of your request. Your appeal letter should provide reasons and supporting information as to why the initial determination was incorrect. The appeal should clearly identify the particular determination (including the assigned request number, if known) that you are appealing. For the quickest possible handling of a mail request, you should mark your appeal letter and the envelope “Privacy Act Appeal.” The Chairman of the agency or his or her designee will act on the appeal, except that an appeal ordinarily will not be acted on if the request becomes a matter of FOIA or Privacy Act litigation.
( b ) *Responses to appeals.* The decision on your appeal will be made in writing. A decision affirming an adverse determination in whole or in part will include a brief statement of the reason(s) for the affirmance, including any exemption applied, and will inform you of the Privacy Act provisions for court review of the decision. If the adverse determination is reversed or modified on appeal in whole or in part, then you will be notified in a written decision and your request will be reprocessed in accordance with that appeal decision.
( c ) *When appeal is required.* As a general rule, if you wish to seek review by a court of any adverse determination or denial of a request, you must first appeal it under this section.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News

Military Response in Hawaii Has Been Quick, as Requested by Local OfficialsAugust 28, 2023 — More than 570 military personnel are providing support to county, state and federal authorities in Hawaii to ensure the people of Maui receive necessary aid and assistance following deadly wildfires on the island. ... MORE 

----

2024 (327)2023 (825)2022 (1193)2021 (1066)2020 (1083)2019 (1166)2018 (1116)2017 (1356)2016 (1475)2015 (1408)2014 (904)2013 (32)2012 (4)

About DoDDoD CareersJoin the MilitaryNewsUSA.govPhotos & VideosPrivacy & SecurityTop Issues

US INDOPACOM Inspector GeneralDoD Inspector General Accessibility/Section 508DoD FOIAUS INDOPACOM FOIALink DisclaimerNo FEAR ActRecovery ActINDOPACOM Webmaster

                  - Facebook
                  - X
                  - YouTube
                  - Instagram
                  - RSS

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
Document

Exhibit 10.3


FIFTH ADDENDUM TO STANDARD INDUSTRIAL/COMMERCIAL MULTI-TENANT LEASE - NET DATED JANUARY 13, 2012 BY AND BETWEEN RGS PROPERTIES, AS LESSOR AND EXAGEN DIAGNOSTICS, INC., AS LESSEE, FOR THE PREMISES LOCATED AT 1261 LIBERTY WAY, SUITES B & C, CALIFORNIA.


Lessor and Lessee mutually agree to amend the lease as follows:


Parties (1.1):
Lessee has changed their name and shall here for be referred to as Exagen Inc., a Delaware Corporation


Paragraph 1.3 (Term):
The Lease Term will be extended to the new Expiration Date of April 30, 2027


Paragraph 50 (Rent Schedule):
Base Rent shall be as follows:


						
	Dates	Base Rent
	February 1, 2026 - April 30, 2027	$20,084.42 per month




All other terms and conditions of the existing Lease shall remain in full force and effect.


This addendum shall automatically expire is not executed by Lessee on or before Friday October 15, 2021.


AGREED AND ACCEPTED:


									
	LESSOR:		LESSEE:
	RGS Properties		Exagen Inc., a Delaware Corporation
			
	By: /s/ Scott Smith		By: /s/ Ron Rocca
	By: /s/ Greg Smith		Ron Rocca
	Date: 10/19/2021		Title: CEO
			Date: 10/12/2021
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Secretary of the Army Visits Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam, Hawaii 

By Sgt. Kimberly K. Menzies

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More Articles/News
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 32 (Wednesday, February 16, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 9072-9073]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-3657]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY

[Meeting No. 11-01]


Sunshine Act Meeting Notice; February 18, 2011

    The TVA Board of Directors will hold a public meeting on February 
18, 2011, at the Tri-County Community College, 21 Campus Circle, 
Murphy, North Carolina, to consider the matters listed below. The 
public may comment on any agenda item or subject at a public listening 
session which begins at 8:30 a.m. (EST). Immediately following the end 
of the public listening session, the meeting will be called to order to 
consider the agenda items listed below. Please Note: Speakers must pre-
register online at TVA.gov or sign in before the meeting begins at 8:30 
a.m. (EST) on the day of the meeting. The Board will answer questions 
from the news media following the Board meeting.

Status:  Open.

Agenda

Old Business

    Approval of minutes of November 4, 2010, Board Meeting

New Business

1. Chairman's Welcome
2. President's Report
3. Governance Item--Nuclear Oversight Committee Charter Amendment
4. Report of the Audit, Risk, and Regulation Committee
5. Report of the People and Performance Committee
6. Report of the Finance, Rates, and Portfolio Committee
    A. Contract with American Centrifuge Enrichment, LLC, for uranium 
enrichment services
    B. Contract with Cameco, Inc., for uranium hexafluoride
    C. Construction of a new gypsum dewatering facility at Kingston 
Fossil Plant
    D. Adjustment Addendum (Fuel Cost Adjustment) and other rate change 
implementation matters

[[Page 9073]]

    E. Contract(s) for operations materials and industrial equipment
    F. Power contracts--(i) Extension of an existing power supply 
agreement and (ii) authorization of service to new firm load
7. Report of the Customer and External Relations Committee
    A. Demand Response Program delegation
8. Report of the Nuclear Oversight Committee

    For more information: Please call TVA Media Relations at (865) 632-
6000, Knoxville, Tennessee. People who plan to attend the meeting and 
have special needs should call (865) 632-6000. Anyone who wishes to 
comment on any of the agenda in writing may send their comments to: TVA 
Board of Directors, Board Agenda Comments, 400 West Summit Hill Drive, 
Knoxville, Tennessee 37902.

    Dated: February 11, 2011.
Ralph E. Rodgers,
Acting General Counsel and Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011-3657 Filed 2-14-11; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 8120-08-P
#### TED R. MESSICK and MILDRED M. MESSICK, Petitioners, *v.*The DISTRICT COURT OF the SIXTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT of the State of Montana, IN AND FOR the COUNTY OF PARK, and the HONORABLE JACK D. SHANSTROM, a Judge thereof, Respondents.

No. 13798.

July 19, 1977.

565 P.2d 1391.

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

IT IS ORDERED that the application for writ of supervisory control in the above captioned cause is hereby denied.
§ 183.11 What documents must the Tribe submit to request money from the Lease Fund? To request a distribution of income from the Lease Fund, the Tribe must submit to us all of the following documents: ( a ) A certified copy of a duly enacted resolution of the Tribal Council requesting a distribution from the Lease Fund;
( b ) A pro forma budget for each identified economic development project and a program budget for each identified community development project, approved by the Tribal Council, showing precisely how the Tribe will spend the money;
( c ) Supporting documentation for the budgets required by paragraph (b) of this section, and
( d ) A certification stating that the Tribe will use the funds in accordance with budgets submitted under this section.
#### §§ 500.141-500.148 [Reserved]
#### § 101.19 Assignment of loans.

A borrower of a direct loan from the United States may not assign the loan agreement or any interest in it to a third party without the consent of the Commissioner. Relending organizations which are conducting relending programs may not assign the loan agreements of borrowers, or any interest therein, to third parties without the approval of the Commissioner and the borrower.
§ 11.907 Transfer to Court of Indian Offenses. ( a ) The presenting officer or the minor may file a petition requesting the children's court to transfer the minor to the Court of Indian Offenses if the minor is 14 years of age or older and is alleged to have committed an act that would have been considered a crime if committed by an adult.
( b ) The children's court shall conduct a hearing to determine whether jurisdiction of the minor should be transferred to the Court of Indian Offenses. ( 1 ) The transfer hearing shall be held no more than 30 days after the petition is filed.
( 2 ) Written notice of the transfer hearing shall be given to the minor and the minor's parents, guardian or custodian at least 72 hours prior to the hearing.
( c ) All the rights listed in § 11.906 shall be afforded the parties at the transfer hearing.
( d ) The following factors shall be considered when determining whether to transfer jurisdiction of the minor to the Court of Indian Offenses: ( 1 ) The nature and seriousness of the offense with which the minor is charged.
( 2 ) The nature and condition of the minor, as evidenced by his or her age; mental and physical condition; past record of offenses; and responses to past children's court efforts at rehabilitation.
( e ) The children's court may transfer jurisdiction of the minor to the Court of Indian Offenses if the children's court finds clear and convincing evidence that both of the following circumstances exist: ( 1 ) There are no reasonable prospects for rehabilitating the minor through resources available to the children's court; and
( 2 ) The offense allegedly committed by the minor evidences a pattern of conduct which constitutes a substantial danger to the public.
( f ) When a minor is transferred to the Court of Indian Offenses, the children's court shall issue a written transfer order containing reasons for its order. The transfer order constitutes a final order for purposes of appeal.
#### Samuel Weltman and Isaac Pollack, Respondents, *v.*Louis Kotlar, Appellant.

Second Department,

February 28, 1908.

Evidence — agency — declarations of agent.

An agency cannot be proved by the declarations of the agent.

■ Appeal by the defendant, Louis Kotlar, from a judgment of the Municipal Court of the city of Mew York, borough of Brooklyn, in favor of the plaintiffs, rendered on the 27th day of March, . . 1907.

*Max*Salomon, for the appellant.

*Stone'& Glmgerman,*for the respondents.

Pee Curiam :

The plaintiffs have recovered a judgment for use and occupation of .certain premises. Bothenberg ■ was the original tenant. of the' premises as a shopkeeper, and the theory of the plaintiffs is that the defendant took his place. There is no proof of any dealings of any kind between the plaintiffs and the defendant, but the plaintiffs rely upon certain declarations made to their agent by Bothenberg as to his. agency for the defendant and his promise as such agent. But agency cannot be proved by the declarations of the agent, and the defendant’s objection and exception to this testimony was well taken. The plaintiffs insist, however, that this testimony was made competent because they read in evidence a certain agree-, ment of record between Bothenberg and the defendant, whereby such agency was established. But the agreement must be read as a mortgage of the stock in trade of Bothenberg as security for a loan, with the further provision that Bothenberg may continue his business, sell the stock, account therefor and deduct a certain amount weekly from the sales for his living expenses. It is.true that the agreement contains a provision that the mortgagee at any time may go into possession, but the proof is not sufficient to establish that the defendant ever .went into possession so as to becbme liable to *495the plaintiffs for use and occupation of the premises. For these reasons the judgment must be reversed and a new trial be ordered, with costs to abide the event.

Woodward, Jenks, Gaynor and Bich, JJ., concurred ; Hooker, J., dissented.

Judgment of the Municipal Court reversed and a new trial ordered, costs to abide the event.
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 35 (Tuesday, February 22, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 9869]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-3787]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

February 15, 2010.
    The Department of the Treasury will submit the following public 
information collection requirement to OMB for review and clearance 
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13 on or 
after the date of publication of this notice. A copy of the submission 
may be obtained by calling the Treasury Bureau Clearance Officer 
listed. Comments regarding this information collection should be 
addressed to the OMB reviewer listed and to the Treasury PRA Clearance 
Officer, Department of the Treasury, 1750 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., 
Suite 11010, Washington, DC 20220.

DATES: Written comments should be received on or before March 24, 2011 
to be assured of consideration.

Internal Revenue Service (IRS)

    OMB Number: 1545-0099.
    Type of Review: Revision to a currently approved collection.
    Title: U.S. Return of Partnership Income and related schedules.
    Form: 1065 and related schedules.
    Abstract: IRC section 6031 requires partnerships to file returns 
that show gross income items, allowable deductions, partners' names, 
addresses, and distribution shares, and other information. This 
information is used to verify correct reporting of partnership items 
and for general statistics.
    Respondents: Private sector: Businesses or other for-profits.
    Estimated Total Burden Hours: 830,348,067 hours.
    Bureau Clearance Officer: Yvette Lawrence, Internal Revenue 
Service, 1111 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20224; (202) 
927-4374.
    OMB Reviewer: Shagufta Ahmed, Office of Management and Budget, New 
Executive Office Building, Room 10235, Washington, DC 20503; (202) 395-
7873.

Dawn D. Wolfgang,
Treasury PRA Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 2011-3787 Filed 2-18-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
H. Res. 174

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

May 19, 1999.

Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule

XVIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee of the

Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of

the bill (H.R. 1654) to authorize appropriations for the National Aeronautics and Space Administration for fiscal years

2000, 2001, and 2002, and for other purposes. The first

reading of the bill shall be dispensed with. Points of order

against consideration of the bill for failure to comply with

clause 4(a) of rule XIII are waived. General debate shall be

confined to the bill and shall not exceed one hour equally divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority

member of the Committee on Science. After general debate

the bill shall be considered for amendment under the fiveminute rule. It shall be in order to consider as an original

bill for the purpose of amendment under the five-minute rule

the amendment in the nature of a substitute recommended by

the Committee on Science now printed in the bill. The com-
2

•HRES 174 EH

mittee amendment in the nature of a substitute shall be considered as read. Points of order against the amendment for

failure to comply with clause 7 of rule XVI are waived. During consideration of the bill for amendment, the Chairman of

the Committee of the Whole may accord priority in recognition on the basis of whether the Member offering an amendment has caused it to be printed in the portion of the Congressional Record designated for that purpose in clause 8 of

rule XVIII. Amendments so printed shall be considered as

read. The Chairman of the Committee of the Whole may: (1)

postpone until a time during further consideration in the

Committee of the Whole a request for a recorded vote on any

amendment; and (2) reduce to five minutes the minimum

time for electronic voting on any postponed question that follows another electronic vote without intervening business,

provided that the minimum time for electronic voting on the

first in any series of questions shall be 15 minutes. At the

conclusion of consideration of the bill for amendment the

Committee shall rise and report the bill to the House with

such amendments as may have been adopted. Any Member

may demand a separate vote in the House on any amendment

adopted in the Committee of the Whole to the bill or to the

committee amendment in the nature of a substitute. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill and

amendments thereto to final passage without intervening mo-
3

•HRES 174 EH

tion except one motion to recommit with or without instructions.

Attest:

Clerk.