alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2 – 906 Certification





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C., SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A2 of Genmed Holding Corp. (the "Company") for the quarter ended June 30, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer) of the Company, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered by the Report.





Date: Septeber 16, 2011
/s/ Randy HibmaRandy Hibma

Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial Officer)


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 ("Section 906"), or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Genmed Holding Corp., and will be retained by Genmed Holding Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
DRAFT

LV Working Group

Draft Agenda

(exact schedule may vary, depending on

rate of progress through agenda items)

9:00 – Noon

Introductions

Approval of Agenda

Agreement on Ground rules for Committee (see Attachment)

Note that the attached ground rules were reviewed and provisionally adopted (subject to in-house

counsel review by

Discussion of schedule and location of meetings

Overview of Navigant Engineering Analysis of Low-Voltage Transformer Efficiency Standards

Noon – 1:00

Lunch Break

1:00 - 3:00

Overview of LBL Analysis of Low-Voltage Transformer Efficiency Standards

Identification of key issues and s ub-issues, data needs and capabilities

Discussion of TSL criteria for LVDT transformer analysis

3:00 - 3:30 Break

3:30 – 5:00

Identification of issues and data needs and adoption of TSL criteria

5:00 Adjourn
IV

House Calendar No. 152

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 362

[Report No. 106–450]

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 3196) making appropriations

for foreign operations, export financing, and related programs for the

fiscal year ending September 30, 2000, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

NOVEMBER 5 (legislative day, NOVEMBER 4), 1999

Mr. DIAZ-BALART, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be

printed

RESOLUTION

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 3196) making

appropriations for foreign operations, export financing,

and related programs for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2000, and for other purposes.

1 Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution

2 it shall be in order without intervention of any point of

3 order to consider in the House the bill (H.R. 3196) mak4 ing appropriations for foreign operations, export financ5 ing, and related programs for the fiscal year ending Sep-
2

HRES 362 RH

1 tember 30, 2000, and for other purposes. The bill shall

2 be considered as read for amendment. The previous ques3 tion shall be considered as ordered on the bill and any

4 amendment thereto to final passage without intervening

5 motion except: (1) one hour of debate equally divided and

6 controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member

7 of the Committee on Appropriations; (2) the amendment

8 printed in the report of the Committee on Rules accom9 panying this resolution, if offered by Representative

10 Young of Florida or his designee, which shall be in order

11 without intervention of any point of order or demand for

12 division of the question, shall be considered as read, and

13 shall be separately debatable for the time specified in the

14 report equally divided and controlled by the proponent and

15 an opponent; and (3) one motion to recommit with or

16 without instructions.

17 SEC. 2. House Resolution 359 is laid on the table.

House Calendar No. 152

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 362

[Report No. 106–450]

RESOLUTION

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 3196)

making appropriations for foreign operations, export financing, and related programs for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2000, and forother purposes.

NOVEMBER 5 (legislative day, NOVEMBER 4), 1999

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be

printed
MEM VIO 

To date, appellant has failed to respond to our order to show 

cause or to otherwise demonstrate that this court has jurisdiction to 

consider this appeal. Accordingly, it appears we lack jurisdiction, and we 

ORDER this appeal DISMISSED. 

GiblAns 

#41 

Douglas 

, J. 

cc: Hon. Brent T. Adams, District Judge 

Jill I. Greiner, Settlement Judge 

Tory M. Pankopf 

Gordon Silver/Reno 

Washoe District Court Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

(0) 1947A 

2
### §2637. Transportation in certain areas outside the United States

The Secretary of Defense may authorize the commander of a unified combatant command to use Government owned or leased vehicles to provide transportation in an area outside the United States for members of the uniformed services and Federal civilian employees under the jurisdiction of that commander, and for the dependents of such members and employees, if the commander determines that public or private transportation in such area is unsafe or not available. Such transportation shall be provided in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of Defense.

(Added Pub. L. 101–510, div. A, title III, §326(a)(1), Nov. 5, 1990, 104 Stat. 1531.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 2637, added Pub. L. 98–525, title VI, §614(a), Oct. 19, 1984, 98 Stat. 2540, related to use of passenger motor vehicles of United States for transportation between residences and places of work of senior defense officials, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 99–550, §2(a)(1), Oct. 27, 1986, 100 Stat. 3070.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

# Readout of the 17th U.S. – India Defense Policy Group  

DoD Immediate Release

WASHINGTON -- Department of Defense Spokesman Lt. Col. David Herndon provided the following readout:Under Secretary of Defense for Policy Dr. Colin Kahl co-chaired the 17th U.S.-India Defense Policy Group alongside Defense Secretary Giridhar Aramane of the Indian Ministry of Defense today. The Dialogue advanced an ambitious agenda — including industrial cooperation, information-sharing, maritime security, and technological collaboration — that reflects the robust and comprehensive defense ties between the United States and India.The officials exchanged views about shared priorities in the Indian Ocean Region and aligning the U.S.-India partnership with other like-minded partnerships to sustain a free and open Indo-Pacific.The leaders reinforced their commitment to strengthening cooperation and interoperability between the U.S. and Indian militaries to work together in all domains and across all services.The Dialogue renewed the enduring commitment by the United States and India to deepen their Major Defense Partnership.

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More
#### Kuratnik *v.*Illinois Steel Company.

[No. 12,093.

Filed January 9, 1925.]

Master and *Servant.—Appeal from Industrial Board allowed only from a final*award.—There is no provision in the statute for an appeal from the Industrial Board except from a final award, from which it follows that there can be no appeal from a ruling of the board that a claim for compensation will be suspended until the attorneys prosecuting the claim prove their authority to appear for claimant.

Appeal from Industrial Board of Indiana.

Proceeding under Workmen’s Compensation Act by Evdokia Kuratnik against the Illinois Steel Company for compensation for the death of husband. From an order suspending the proceeding until claimant’s attor*367neys prove their authority to appear, claimant appeals.

*Appeal dismissed.*

*Fred Barnett*and *Dominie P. Sevald,*for appellant.

Per Curiam.

Appellant lives, and has always lived, in Russia. Her husband was injured while in the course of his employment with appellee which' injury resulted in his death. Attorneys, claiming to represent her, filed with the Industrial Board an application on her behalf for compensation for herself and her minor daughter. After hearing evidence, the Industrial Board suspended further proceedings until the attorneys should prove their authority, to appear for appellant. This the attorneys declined to do, and appeal from said order of suspension.

There is no provision in the statute for an appeal from the Industrial Board except from a final award. Even if appellant was entitled to proceed without proof of authority, which we do not decide, she has mistaken her remedy.

Appeal dismissed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          1,027,390
<SECURITIES>                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                           0
<ALLOWANCES>                                            0
<INVENTORY>                                             0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                1,471,536
<PP&E>                                             42,946
<DEPRECIATION>                                     14,899
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  1,530,809
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             885,451
<BONDS>                                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                            26
<COMMON>                                            4,612
<OTHER-SE>                                        640,720
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    1,530,809
<SALES>                                             4,805
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    4,805
<CGS>                                             224,374
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   1,691,173
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                        0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 16,309
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,927,051)
<INCOME-TAX>                                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,927,051)
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,927,051)
<EPS-BASIC>                                         (0.44)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       (0.44)



</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

ALEJANDRO DEJESUS,

Petitioner

v.

COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF LANCASTER COUNTY,

Respondent :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 136 MM 2015

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 29th day of October, 2015, the Application for Leave to File

Original Process is GRANTED

, and the Petition for Writ of Mandamus and/or

Extraordinary Relief is DENIED

.
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Corporate Trust Services**

  MAC R1204-010  9062 Old Annapolis Road  Columbia, MD 21045  Tel: 410 884 2000  Fax: 410 715 2380 |
|--------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

Morgan Stanley Capital I Inc.

1585 BROADWAY

Attn: Mortgage BackedSecurities

NEW YORK, New York 10036-8200

 

Re: Annual Statement ofCompliance for Morgan Stanley Capital I Inc., Commercial Mortgage Pass-ThroughCertificates, Series 2012-C4

 

Per the Pooling and ServicingAgreement dated as of March 1, 2012 (the "Agreement"), theundersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., asCertificate Administrator ("Wells Fargo"), hereby certifies asfollows as of and for the year ending December 31, 2016 (the "ReportingPeriod"):

 

(a) A review of Wells Fargo'sactivities during the Reporting Period and of its performance under theAgreement has been made under such officer's supervision; and

 

(b) To the best of suchofficer's knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of itsobligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout theReporting Period.

 

 

February 27, 2017

 

 

/s/ Brian Smith

BRIAN SMITH

Vice President 

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together we’ll  go far |
|------------------------|-------------------------------------|
**
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Carla Anita Kneipp,certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of CenterPoint Energy Transition Bond Company IV, LLC (the “Exchange Act periodicreports”); 

2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports; 

4. I amresponsible for reviewing the activities performed by the Servicer, and based on my knowledge and the compliance review conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, andexcept as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the Transition Property Servicing Agreement dated as of January 19, 2012 between CenterPoint Energy Transition Bond Company IV, LLC, asthe Issuing Entity, and the Servicer, in all material respects; and 

5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicingcriteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB andExchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances ofnoncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

In giving thecertifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as Indenture Trustee. 

Date: March 25, 2020 

 
/s/ Carla Anita KneippName: Carla Anita KneippTitle: 
Vice President and Treasurer

(Senior Officerin Charge of Servicing Function) CenterPoint Energy Houston Electric, LLC, as servicer

 
**
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# U.S., Japanese Service Members Build Strategic Partnerships at Kadena Air Base

By Airman 1st Class Corey M. Pettis

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More New/Articles
151 So.2d 791

#### Ex parte Ralph Leon GANDY.

6 Div. 958-A.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

April *4,*1963.

Ralph Leon Gandy, pro se.

Richmond M. Flowers, Atty. Gen., and Geo. D. Mentz, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.

COLEMAN, Justice.

Writ denied.

LIVINGSTON, C. J., and GOODWYN and MERRILL, JJ., concur.
### Atlantic Continental Shelf and Slope of the United States - Physiography

By: Elazar Uchupi

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/pp529C

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (5145 pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (9876 pdf)                        
  - **Plate 2**                            (6504 pdf)                        
  - **Plate 3**                            (6933 pdf) 
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
EXHIBIT 31.2  --  Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section
                  302 of the Sorbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

                                CERTIFICATION

I, Ely Sakhai, President and Chief Executive Officer certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Australian-Canadian
Oil Royalties Ltd.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this quarterly report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and I have:

   (a)  designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
   material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
   subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
   particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being
   prepared;

   (b)  evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
   and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
   quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

   (c)  presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
   effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
   evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing
equivalent function):

   (a)  all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of  internal
   controls that could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
   process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
   registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

   (b)  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
   employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
   controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal
controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date:  August 10, 2004


/s/ Ely Sakhai
--------------------------------
Ely Sakhai, President and
Chief Executive Officer