alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Graham Packaging Holdings Company on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the Report), I, Mark S. Burgess, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Graham Packaging Holdings
Company.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: November 9, 2010



|    |  |                        
|--- |  | -----------------------
|By: |  | /S/  MARK S.
BURGESS   
|    |  | Mark S. Burgess        
|    |  | Chief Executive Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code) and is not being
filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
`[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 326 Reported in House (RH)]






                                                 House Calendar No. 127
106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 326

                          [Report No. 106-375]

Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the 
 bill (H.R. 2561) making appropriations for the Department of Defense 
 for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2000, and for other purposes.


_______________________________________________________________________


                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 12, 1999

   Mrs. Myrick, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION


 
Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the 
 bill (H.R. 2561) making appropriations for the Department of Defense 
 for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2000, and for other purposes.

    Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in 
order to consider the conference report to accompany the bill (H.R. 
2561) making appropriations for the Department of Defense for the 
fiscal year ending September 30, 2000, and for other purposes. All 
points of order against the conference report and against its 
consideration are waived. The conference report shall be considered as 
read.
                                     





                                                 House Calendar No. 127

106th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                              H. RES. 326

                          [Report No. 106-375]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the 
 bill (H.R. 2561) making appropriations for the Department of Defense 
 for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2000, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                            October 12, 1999

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed`
#### St. John Wood and Others v. John C. Proudman.

Motion denied, with ten dollars costs. ■
Exhibit 99.1


                 CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO
                         18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                          AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 Section 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Australian-
Canadian Oil Royalties Ltd. (the "Company") for the quarterly period ended
June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"), Ely Sakhai, Chairman of the Board and President
of the Company, and Robert Kamon, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of
the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the
best of their knowledge, that:

    1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
    or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

    2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
    material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
    the Company.



/s/ Ely Sakhai
-------------------------------------------------
Ely Sakhai
Chairman of the Board and President

August 14, 2003




/s/ Robert Kamon
------------------------------------------------
Robert Kamon
Chief Financial Officer and Secretary

August 14, 2003


This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes
of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
H. Res. 223

In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

June 25, 1999.

Resolved, That the following named Member be, and he

is hereby, elected to the following standing committees of the

House of Representatives:

COMMITTEE ON GOVERNMENT REFORM: Mr. Vitter.

COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY: Mr. Vitter.

COMMITTEE ON TRANSPORTATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE: Mr. Vitter.

Attest:

Clerk.
**GAO-10-988R**                      Published: Sep 29, 2010. Publicly Released: Sep 29, 2010.                  

-   
-   
-   
-   

    Jump To:  
-  Elder Abuse 
-  Services for Older Adults 
-  State and Local-Level Drivers and Trends 
-  State and Local Fiscal Projections 
-  Federal Borrowing 
-  Managing the Debt 
-  Summary of Funding Provisions 
-  Auditing the Government's Books 
-  Unpacking the Financial Report 
-  Highlights 
-  Recommendations 
-  Background 
-  About This Work 
-  About This Work 
-  Trends 
-  About the Center 
-  Why It's High Risk 
-  What Remains To Be Done 
-  Key Reports 
-  Newest COVID-Related Reports 
-  AI Use Cases 
-  Flood Insurance 
-  Past Pandemic-Related Reports 
-  CARES Act Oversight Reports 
-  All COVID-19 Reports 
-  Report Suspected Fraud 
-  Subjects 
-  How to Get Notified 
-  Past Reports 
-  Public Health Threats 
-  Explore the FY 2022 and 2023 Funds 
-  Lessons Learned 
-  Agency Reports 
-  Recent Reports 
-  Recommendations 
-  Supplemental Material 
-  Full Report 
-  Additional Data 
-  View Decision 
-  Downloads 
-  Previously Identified Actions 
-  Related Pages 
-  Associated Agencies 
-  Tough Choices and Opportunities Ahead 
-  Americas Fiscal Future Key Areas 
-  Retirement Security Key Areas 
-  Current List 
-  About The High Risk List 
-  Area Ratings 
-  Previous High Risk Products 
-  Search Federal Vacancies 
-  Past Federal Vacancies 
-  Violation Letters 
-  About the Yellow Book 
-  Advisory Council 
-  Related Resources 
-  Comment Letters 
-  Related Publications 
-  Contacts and Resources 
-  Major Issues Facing the Nation 
-  Meeting Strategic Challenges 
-  Additional Resources 
-  Resources 
-  GAO Contacts 
-  Mission Teams 
-  Operations and Staff Offices  
-  Organization Chart  
-  Why a Career at GAO? 
-  Am I Qualified? 
-  Company Culture 
-  Reasonable Accommodations 
-  Video Gallery 
-  Paid Internships 
-  Student Volunteers 
-  Professional Development Program 
-  Advancement 
-  Executive Candidate Program 
-  Summer Associates 
-  Externships 
-  Benefits 
-  Contacts 

Skip to Highlights

## Highlights

This letter formally transmits our response to section 332 of the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for Fiscal Year 2010. Section 332 of the NDAA for Fiscal Year 2010 expanded the Department of Defense's (DOD) annual reporting requirements under 10 U.S.C. 2925(a), regarding DOD's energy efficiency programs. Additionally, section 332(b) states that the first report submitted by the Secretary of Defense under 10 U.S.C. 2925(a) after the date of enactment of the NDAA for Fiscal Year 2010 shall include information on eight specific issues, in addition to the matters required under the revised 10 U.S.C. 2925(a). Section 332(c) requires the Comptroller General to review that supplemental report.

## Full Report

Full Report (5 pages)

Accessible Text 

## Office of Public Affairs

Sarah Kaczmarek
kaczmareks@gao.gov

(202) 512-4800

## Topics

National Defense

Defense economic analysisEnergy efficiencyEnergy managementEnergy policyFederal lawPolicy evaluationReporting requirementsRenewable energy sourcesDefense budgetsDefense capabilities
### §3172. [Reserved]

(Added Pub. L. 116–283, div. A, title XVIII, §1810(d), Jan. 1, 2021, 134 Stat. 4164; amended Pub. L. 117–81, div. A, title XVII, §1701(i)(2)(B), Dec. 27, 2021, 135 Stat. 2141.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2021—Pub. L. 117–81, §1701(i)(2)(B), amended Pub. L. 116–283, §1810(d), which enacted this section, by substituting "[Reserved]" for "Operational contract support: chain of authority and responsibility within Department of Defense" in section catchline.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2021 Amendment

Amendment made to Pub. L. 116–283 by Pub. L. 117–81, resulting in omission of this section, applicable as if included in the enactment of title XVIII of Pub. L. 116–283 as enacted, see section 1701(a)(2) of Pub. L. 117–81, set out in a note preceding section 3001 of this title and Effective Date note below.

#### Effective Date

Section effective Jan. 1, 2022, with additional provisions for delayed implementation and applicability of existing law, see section 1801(d) of Pub. L. 116–283, set out as an Effective Date of 2021 Amendment note preceding section 3001 of this title.
§ 162.541 What must the lease include if it contains an option to renew? ( a ) If the lease provides for an option to renew, the lease must specify: ( 1 ) The time and manner in which the option must be exercised or is automatically effective;
( 2 ) That confirmation of the renewal will be submitted to us, unless the lease provides for automatic renewal;
( 3 ) Whether Indian landowner consent to the renewal is required;
( 4 ) That the lessee must provide notice of the renewal to the Indian landowners and any sureties and mortgagees;
( 5 ) The additional consideration, if any, that will be due upon the exercise of the option to renew or the start of the renewal term; and
( 6 ) Any other conditions for renewal (e.g., that the lessee not be in violation of the lease at the time of renewal).
( b ) We will record any renewal of a lease in the LTRO.
§ 170.424 What is the TTP Transportation Improvement Program (TTPTIP)? ( a ) Each year, FHWA will compile the approved TTIPs for all of the Tribes into one document called the TTPTIP. This document will identify all expected projects and activities over a four-year period and will be organized by fiscal year, State, and Tribe.
( b ) FHWA and BIA will post the approved TTPTIP on their respective Web sites. A subset of the TTPTIP that identifies only design and construction activities will annually be provided to the pertinent FHWA Division office for further transmittal to each State Transportation Office/Department for inclusion in the STIP without further action per 23 U.S.C. 201(c)(4).
EXHIBIT 13.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report on Form 20-F of GasLog Ltd., a corporation organized under the laws of Bermuda (the Company), for the period ending December 31, 2014, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned officer of
  the Company certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|
|
|
|
|

The foregoing certification is provided solely for purposes of complying with the provisions of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not intended to be used or relied upon for any other purpose.

|    |  |                               
|--- |  | ------------------------------
|    |  | Date: March 25, 2015          
|By: |  | /s/ Paul Wogan                
|    |  |                               
|    |  | Name: Paul Wogan              
|    |  | Title: Chief Executive Officer



---
#### § 183.1 What is the purpose of this part?

This part implements section 3707(e) of the San Carlos Apache Tribe Water Settlement Act (the Act), Public Law 102-575, 106 Stat. 4748, that requires regulations to administer the Trust Fund, and the Lease Fund established by the Act.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

# Weapons Flight Arms Most Prolific A-10 Unit

By Staff Sgt. Jake Barreiro51st Fighter Wing Public Affairs

                OSAN AIR BASE, Republic of Korea  –              

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More News/Articles
§ 170.934 Are alternative dispute resolution procedures available? ( a ) Federal agencies should use mediation, conciliation, arbitration, and other techniques to resolve disputes brought by TTP beneficiaries. The goal of these alternative dispute resolution (ADR) procedures is to provide an inexpensive and expeditious forum to resolve disputes. Federal agencies should resolve disputes at the lowest possible staff level and in a consensual manner whenever possible.
( b ) Except as required in 25 CFR part 900 and part 1000, Tribes operating under a self-determination contract or self-governance agreement are entitled to use dispute resolution techniques prescribed in: ( 1 ) The ADR Act, 5 U.S.C. 571-583;
( 2 ) The Contract Disputes Act, 41 U.S.C. 601-613; and
( 3 ) The ISDEAA and the implementing regulations (including for non-construction the mediation and alternative dispute resolution options listed in 25 U.S.C. 4501 (model contract section (b)(12)).
( 4 ) Tribes operating under a Program Agreement with FHWA are entitled to use dispute resolution techniques prescribed in 25 CFR 170.934 and Article II, Section 4 of the Agreement.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Winter motor vehicle use map.White River National Forest. Rifle Ranger District, Colorado**
 
2017
 
SuDoc Number:A 13.28:W 58/13/
Item Number:0080-G (online)
CGP systemNumber:001036815
 
December 18, 2017
#### § 166.216 Who is responsible for permitting Indian land?

The Indian landowner is primarily responsible for granting permits on their Indian land, with the assistance and approval of the BIA, except where otherwise provided by law. You may contact the local BIA or tribal office for assistance in obtaining a permit for grazing purposes on Indian land.
§ 183.15 Must the Tribe submit any reports? Yes. The Tribe must submit the following reports after receiving funds under this part: ( a ) An Annual Report, that must be submitted no later than December 31 of each year; and
( b ) A Financial Audit, that must be submitted no later than March 1 of each year.
CAUSE NO. 03-15-00376-CV

DELORES GALVAN, § COURT OF APPEALS 

 Appellant, § 

 § 

 § 

vs. § THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT 

 § 

 § 

ROBERT LEAK, Individually and § 

ZEBRA INSTRUMENTS § 

CORPORATION, § 

 Appellees. § STATE OF TEXAS 

APPELLANT’S FOURTH MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE BRIEF

COMES NOW, Delores Galvan, Appellant herein, requesting a three month 

(90) day extension to file her Appellant’s Brief. 

Appellant’s Brief was due October 28, 2015. Appellant seeks a three month 

(90) day extension. Appellant’s counsel was being assisted by attorney Gerald 

Staton in the preparation of the Appellant's Brief. Attorney Gerald Staton passed 

away on November 9, 2015 in Fort Worth, Texas. (see attached). Appellant's 

counsel is in the process of gathering from Mr. Staton's estate his notes and 

research regarding the Appellant’s Brief. 

For this reason the Appellant respectfully requests a three month (90) day 

extension so that justice may be done. 

ACCEPTED

03-15-00376-CV

7977417

THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

11/24/2015 3:38:01 PM

JEFFREY D. KYLE

CLERK

 FILED IN 3rd COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 11/24/2015 3:38:01 PM JEFFREY D. KYLE Clerk
Respectfully submitted,

LAW OFFICE OF SCOTT OGLE

By: _/s/_Scott Ogle

Scott Ogle

State Bar No. 00797170

2028 W. Ben White Blvd.

Austin, Texas 78704

Telephone: (512) 442-8833

Facsimile: (512) 442-3256

soglelaw@peoplepc.com

CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE

I certify that I have attempted to conferred with opposing counsel on 

November 24, 2015.

_/s/Scott Ogle

Scott Ogle
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing instrument has 

been delivered to all counsel of record in accordance with the Texas Rules of Civil 

Procedure, on this the 24th day of November, 2015.

Christopher Stanley

Sneed Vine & Perry

1104 S. Church Street

Georgetown, Texas 78626

Via email: gtwnfilings@sneedvine.com

Via facsimile: (512) 819-9707

_/s/Scott Ogle

 Scott Ogle
§ 175.200 Why does BIA collect revenue from you and the other customers it serves, and how is that revenue used? ( a ) The revenue we collect from you and the other customers is authorized by 25 U.S.C. 385c (60 Stat. 895, as amended by 65 Stat. 254).
( b ) The revenue we collect may be used to: ( 1 ) Pay for operation and maintenance of the utility;
( 2 ) Maintain Reserve Funds to: ( i ) Make repairs and replacements to the utility;
( ii ) Defray emergency expenses;
( iii ) Ensure the continuous operation of the power system; and
( iv ) Pay other allowable expenses and obligations to the extent required or permitted by law.
[No. 4304.]

#### Merwin v. Board of County Commissioners of Boulder County.

Opinion Followed.—The judgment in this ease is affirmed upon the opinion in the case between the same parties *ante p.*169-,

*Error to the District Court oj Boulder County.*

Mr. A. C. Patton, for plaintiff in error.

Mr. Lewis S. Young, and Mr. G. E. Halderman, for defendant in error.

Chief Justice Campbell

delivered the opinion of the court.

The questions involved in this case are substantially the same as those considered in *Merwin v. The Board, ante*p. 169. The complaint in the case at bar, however, contains averments, not found in the complaint there, that in disallowing the fees the board acted arbitrarily, without investigation or consideration, and was prompted by malice, ill will and personal dislike of plaintiff. Whether, if such allegations were established, the judgment should be different, we need not determine; for there was no finding by the trial court that such was the motive of the board, and from the record before us we cannot discover that it was. The decision there governs here, and the judgment is, therefore, affirmed.

*Affirmed.*
### §497. Notification required for reduction, consolidation, or withdrawal of nuclear forces based in Europe

(a) Notification.—Upon any decision to reduce, consolidate, or withdraw the nuclear forces of the United States that are based in Europe, the President shall transmit to the appropriate congressional committees a notification containing—

(1) justification for such reduction, consolidation, or withdrawal; and

(2) an assessment of how member states of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, in light of such reduction, consolidation, or withdrawal, assess the credibility of the deterrence capability of the United States in support of its commitments undertaken pursuant to article 5 of the North Atlantic Treaty, signed at Washington, District of Columbia, on April 4, 1949, and entered into force on August 24, 1949 (63 Stat. 2241; TIAS 1964).

(b) Prior Notification Required.—

(1) In general.—The President shall transmit the notification required by subsection (a) by not later than 120 days before the date on which the President commences a reduction, consolidation, or withdrawal of the nuclear forces of the United States that are based in Europe described in such notification.

(2) Exception.—The limitation in paragraph (1) shall not apply to a reduction, consolidation, or withdrawal of nuclear weapons of the United States that are based in Europe made to ensure the safety, security, reliability, and credibility of such weapons.

(c) Appropriate Congressional Committees Defined.—In this section, the term "appropriate congressional committees" means—

(1) the Committees on Armed Services of the House of Representatives and the Senate; and

(2) the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate.

(Added Pub. L. 112–239, div. A, title X, §1037(b)(1), Jan. 2, 2013, 126 Stat. 1926; amended Pub. L. 117–81, div. A, title XVI, §1635, Dec. 27, 2021, 135 Stat. 2091.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2021—Subsec. (b)(1). Pub. L. 117–81 substituted "120 days" for "60 days".
### SUBCHAPTER VII—ADMINISTRATIVE AND MISCELLANEOUS MATTERS

Sec.
381.
Consolidated budget.
382.
Execution and administration of programs and activities.
383.
Assessment, monitoring, and evaluation of programs and activities.
384.
Department of Defense security cooperation workforce development.
385.
Department of Defense support for other departments and agencies of the United States Government that advance Department of Defense security cooperation objectives.
386.
Annual report.