alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §12314. Reserves: kinds of duty

Notwithstanding any other provision of law, a member of a reserve component who is on active duty other than for training may, under regulations prescribed by the Secretary concerned, be detailed or assigned to any duty authorized by law for members of the regular component of the armed force concerned.

(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 31, §682; renumbered §12314, Pub. L. 103–337, div. A, title XVI, §1662(e)(2), Oct. 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 2992.)

| Revised section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 682 | 50:965. | July 9, 1952, ch. 608, §237, 66 Stat. 492. |

The words "armed force concerned" are substituted for the words "Armed Forces of the United States". The words "now or hereafter" and "officers and enlisted" are omitted as surplusage. The words "other than for training" are inserted, since the words "active duty" were defined in the source statute cited above to exclude active duty for training.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1994—Pub. L. 103–337 renumbered section 682 of this title as this section.
# **Exhibit32.2**

**Certificate pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of GB&T Bancshares, Inc.(the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2007, as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,Gregory L. Hamby, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, to the bestof my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.                                       TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.                                       Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| /s/ Gregory L. Hamby                      |   |
|-------------------------------------------|--------|
| Gregory L. Hamby, Chief Financial Officer |
|                                      |
|                                      |
| May 10, 2007                              |

 

----
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | CMBS Department

 

MAC N9401-011

1055 10th Avenue SE

Minneapolis, MN 55414 |
|--------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

Morgan Stanley Capital I Inc.

1585 Broadway

New York, New York 10036

 

 

RE: Annual Statement of Compliance for Morgan Stanley Capital I Inc. Commercial Mortgage Pass-through Certificates Series 2012-C4

 

Per the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of March 1, 2012 (the "Agreement"), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Custodian ("Wells Fargo"), hereby certifies as follows as of and for the year ending December 31, 2015 (the "Reporting Period"):

 

(a) A review of Wells Fargo's activities during the Reporting Period and of its performance under the Agreement has been made under such officer's supervision; and

 

(b) To the best of such officer's knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.

 

 

February 29, 2016

/s/ Gail Vannest

GAIL VANNEST

Vice President

 

 

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Exhibit 32.2  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of QuadTech International, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended January 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Roland Vetter, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to QuadTech International,, Inc. and will be retained by QuadTech International,, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.  September 14, 2006    March 14, 2008 Roland Vetter  J Roland Vetter Chief Financial Officer
#### § 183.9 Can the Tribe request the principal of the Lease Fund?

No. We cannot distribute the principal from the Lease Fund to the Tribe.
EXHIBIT 32.1









CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)







Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of Cellular Concrete Technologies, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:




The amended annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2013 (the "Form 10-K") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







Date:  January 22, 2014




/s/ Paul Falco


Paul Falco Principal Executive Officer


and Principal Accounting Officer









A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided toCELLULAR CONCRETE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.. and will be retained byCELLULAR CONCRETE TECHNOLOGIES, INC..and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### YOUNG *v.*GRUNDY.

No writ of error or appeallies to an injunction.

if the answer neither admits ^legations *of*vTMd on the Inai hearing; but ot'°1<i'¡ssoíuit¡on ofan injunction ®0t0 true,

THIS was an appeal from an *interlocutory decree*of the circuit court of the district of Columbia, *dissolving an injunction.*■

E. *J. Lee,*for the appellant.

The. decree dissolves the injunction *with costs j*which is a final decree as to the costs. 2 *Wash.*200. *Davenport*v. *Mason.*

The material facts of the bill are not denied nor admitted by the answer j they are, therefore, to be taken as true. . The court below must, therefore, have proceeded on the ground that the original equity between the maker ánd payee of the note did affect the endorsee.

Marshall, Ch. J.

If the.answer neither admits nor denies the allegations of the bill, they must be proved upon the final hearing. Upon a question of dissolution of an injunction they are to be taken to be true.

But the court has no doubt upon the question.

*52No appeal, or writ of error will lie to an interlocutory decree dissolving an injunction. .

Writ of error dismissed with costs.
EXHIBIT 32.2



Statement of Chief Financial Officer under 18 U.S.C. § 1350



I, James A Clark, the chief financial officer of Critical Path, Inc. (the
Company), certify for the purposes of section 1350 of chapter 63 of title 18 of the United States Code that, to the best of my knowledge,



| | (i) | the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2005 (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | ---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                  
|------------------
|/s/ James A. Clark
|James A. Clark    



August 9, 2005



A signed original of this written statement required by 18 U.S.C. § 1350 has been
provided to Critical Path, Inc. and will be retained by Critical Path, Inc. and furnished to the Securities Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 32.1









CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)







Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of Cellular Concrete Technologies, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:




The amended annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2013 (the "Form 10-K") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







Date: September 10, 2013




/s/ Paul Falco


Paul Falco Principal Executive Officer


and Principal Accounting Officer









A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided toCELLULAR CONCRETE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.. and will be retained byCELLULAR CONCRETE TECHNOLOGIES, INC..and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
RAYNALDO QUIROGA,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D14-4021

_____________________________/

Opinion filed January 14, 2015.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Lafayette County.

Darren K. Jackson, Judge.

Raynaldo Quiroga, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

PADOVANO, CLARK, and MARSTILLER, JJ., CONCUR.
#### § 142.13 Information collection.

In accordance with Office of Management and Budget regulations in 5 CFR 1320.4, approval of information collections contained in this regulation is not required.
Exhibit 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Hometown Auto Retailers, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q/A for the period ending September 30, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Charles F. Schwartz, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
            of the Company.


January 14, 2003                         /s/ Charles F. Schwartz
                                         -------------------------------------
                                         Charles F. Schwartz
                                         Chief Financial Officer
#### § 10.2 Who is responsible for developing and maintaining the policies and standards for detention and holding facilities in Indian country?

The Director, Office of Law Enforcement Services who reports to the Deputy Commissioner of Indian Affairs, BIA, establishes policies, procedures, and standards for the operations, design, planning, maintenance, renovation, and construction of detention programs in the BIA and by tribal contract under Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act, Public Law 93-638, as amended, 25 U.S.C. 450.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 335 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                      October 20, 1999.
    Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in order to 
consider the conference report to accompany the bill (H.R. 2670) making 
appropriations for the Departments of Commerce, Justice, and State, the 
Judiciary, and related agencies for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2000, 
and for other purposes. All points of order against the conference report and 
against its consideration are waived. The conference report shall be considered 
as read.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
#### Lyons Beet Sugar Refining Company, Appellant, v. George B. Jenkins, Respondent.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. All concurred.
EXHIBIT 31.2 -- Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section
                302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

                               CERTIFICATION

I, Ely Sakhai, President and Chief Executive Officer certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Australian-
Canadian Oil Royalties Ltd.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this quarterly report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and I have:

   (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
   material information relating to the registrant, including its
   consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
   entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report
   is being prepared;

   (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
   and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of
   this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

   (c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
   effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
   evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing
equivalent function):

   (a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of  internal
   controls that could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
   process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
   registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

   (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
   employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
   controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal
controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal
controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any
corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material
weaknesses.

Date:  May 13, 2005

/s/ Ely Sakhai
-------------------------
Ely Sakhai, President and
Chief Executive Officer

                                Exhibit 31.2
§ 18.106 What will the Department consider in the approval process? A tribal probate code must meet the requirements of this section in order to receive our approval under this part. ( a ) The code must be consistent with Federal law.
( b ) The code must promote the policies of the Indian Land Consolidation Act (ILCA) Amendments of 2000, which are to: ( 1 ) Prevent further fractionation;
( 2 ) Consolidate fractional interests into useable parcels;
( 3 ) Consolidate fractional interests to enhance tribal sovereignty;
( 4 ) Promote tribal self-sufficiency and self-determination; and
( 5 ) Reverse the effects of the allotment policy on Indian tribes.
( c ) Unless the conditions in paragraph (d) of this section are met, the code must not prohibit the devise of an interest to: ( 1 ) An Indian lineal descendant of the original allottee; or
( 2 ) An Indian who is not a member of the Indian tribe with jurisdiction over the interest in the land.
( d ) If the tribal probate code prohibits the devise of an interest to the devisees in paragraph (c)(1) or (c)(2) of this section, then the code must: ( 1 ) Allow those devisees to renounce their interests in favor of eligible devisees as defined by the tribal probate code;
( 2 ) Allow a devisee who is the spouse or lineal descendant of the testator to reserve a life estate without regard to waste; and
( 3 ) Require the payment of fair market value as determined by the Department on the date of the decedent's death.
§ 2.402 What form of appeal bond will the reviewing official accept? The reviewing official will only accept an appeal bond that has a market value at least equal to the total bond amount in one, or a combination of, the following forms. ( a ) Negotiable U.S. Treasury securities, accompanied by a statement granting the AS-IA full authority to sell the securities and direct the proceeds to the party who was harmed by the appellant's unsuccessful appeal.
( b ) Certificates of deposit that indicate on their face that AS-IA approval is required prior to redemption by any party.
( c ) An irrevocable letter of credit issued by a federally insured financial institution and made payable to the Office of the AS-IA. The letter of credit must have an initial expiration date of not less than two years from the date of issuance and be automatically renewable for at least one year.
( d ) A surety bond issued by a company approved by the U.S. Department of the Treasury.
[ DO NOT PUBLISH] 

## In the 

# United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit

____________________ No. 22

- 10901 Non

- Argument Calendar

____________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff

- Appellee,

versus JIMMY LEE HIGHSMITH,

Defendant

- Appellant.

____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida D.C. Docket No. 4:21

- cr
- 00008

- MW

- MAF

- 1

____________________ USCA11 Case: 22-10901 Document: 46-1 Date Filed: 02/06/2023 Page: 1 of 22 Opinion of the Court 22

- 10901

Before W ILLIAM P RYOR , Chief Judge, and W ILSON and L UCK , Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Donna Lee Elm , appointed counsel for Jimmy Lee Highsmith in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, cou nsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED , and Highsmith’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED. USCA11 Case: 22-10901 Document: 46-1 Date Filed: 02/06/2023 Page: 2 of 2
INDAGO

VERTICAL TAKE-OFF AND LANDING (VTOL) SYSTEM

FOR COMMERICAL AND MILITARY MARKETS
HANDCONTROLLER

	 • For small UAS; fixed wing and VTOL

	 • Stand-alone, untethered operation

	 • Secure digital data link

	 • Windows 8.1 based operating system

	 • Onboard recording of HD video and stills

	 • Small ergonomic design with large outdoor

	 	 readable touchscreen

	 • Ruggedized and weather resistant

	 • Lightweight: 2.7 -3.3 lbs.

	 • Long run time (4 - 8 hours)

FEATURES

	 • Man packable, compact folding design

	 • Setup in 60 seconds, airborne in 2.5 minutes

	 • Whisper quiet, rugged, all-weather capability

	 • Configurable Failsafe behaviors

	 • Operation via handcontroller and/or full Virtual

	 	 CockpitTM GCS

	 • Hot-swappable payload options for ISR, search &

	 rescue, inspection and agriculture

	 • Industry-leading image stabilization with vision

	 tracking

Specifications

Endurance Up to 50 minutes with payload 

Payload Multiple, hot-swappable payloads

Range 2-10 km (radio and antenna dependent)

Dimensions 32 x 32 x 7 in (12 x 9 x 7 folded)

Weight 5 lbs. (2,300g) with ION payload

Operating Altitude 10-500 ft AGL (typical)

GCS touchscreen handcontroller or

laptop-based Virtual Cockpit

Lockheed Martin

Mission Systems and Training (MST)

300 M Streeet, SE

Washington, D.C. 20003

www.lockheedmartin.com/unmanned

© 2015 Lockheed Martin Corporation

PIRA# OWG201504004

36971

EXPLORE.

EXAMINE.

INVESTIGATE.
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32

                                 CERTIFICATION

We, Roy G. Warren, Chief Executive Officer and Tommy Kee, Chief Accounting
Officer, of Bravo! Foods International Corp. (the "Company"), certify, pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

1. The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarter ended
March 31, 2006 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: May 15, 2009

/s/ Roy G. Warren
    Roy G. Warren
Chief Executive Officer

/s/ Tommy E. Kee
    Tommy E. Kee
Chief Accounting Officer
- 000100fc
- 000200fi
- 00030001
- 00040002
- 00050003
- 00060004
- 00070005
- 00080006
- 00090000
- 00100000
- 00110000
- 00120000
- 00130007
- 00140008
- 00150000
- 00160000
- 00170009
- 00180010
- 00190011
- 00200012
- 00210013
- 00220014
- 00230000
- 00240000
- 00250000
- 00260000
- 00270015
- 00280016
- 00290000
- 00300000
- 00310017
- 00320018
- 00330000
- 00340000
- 00350000
- 00360000
- 00370000
- 00380000
- 00390019
- 00400020
- 00410021
- 00420022
- 00430000
- 00440000
- 00450023
- 00460024
- 00470000
- 00480000
- 00490000
- 00500000
- 00510025
- 00520026
- 00530000
- 00540000
- 00550000
- 00560000
- 00570000
- 00580000
- 00590000
- 00600000
- 00610027
- 00620028
- 006300bi
- 006400bc
§ 170.461 May a Tribe approve plans, specifications, and estimates? An Indian Tribal government may approve plans, specifications and estimates and commence road and bridge construction with funds made available from the TTP through a self-determination contract, self-governance agreement, Program Agreement or other appropriate agreement, developed in accordance with 23 U.S.C. 202(b)(6) & (b)(7), if the Indian Tribal government: ( a ) Provides assurances in the contract or agreement that the construction will meet or exceed applicable health and safety standards;
( b ) Obtains advance review of the plans and specifications from a State-licensed civil engineer that has certified that the plans and specifications meet or exceed the applicable health and safety standards;
( c ) Provides a copy of the certification under paragraph (a) of this section to the Deputy Assistant Secretary for Tribal Government Affairs, Department of Transportation, or the Assistant Secretary—Indian Affairs, DOI, as appropriate; and
( d ) Provides a copy of all project documentation identified in § 170.460 to BIA or FHWA before the start of construction.