alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Order issued November

, 2012

In The 

## (Court of Appeals NMI! Bistrirt of .

aexas at Dallas No. 05-11-01672-CV AMERICAN NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT, L.P., ET AL., Appellants V. THE COLONY ASSETS DEVELOPMENT, L.L.C., Appellee



### ORDER We GRANT 

### the October 26, 2012 motion of Ronald E. Harden with the Law Offices of Ronald E. Harden, P.L.L.C. to withdraw as counsel for appellants, American National Development, L.P., Dibold American Development, LLC, and Bill Baldwin. We DIRECT 

### the Clerk of this Court to remove Ronald E. Harden with the Law Offices of Ronald E. Harden, P.L.L.C. as counsel for appellants. We ORDER 

### appellants to notify the Court, within THIRTY DAYS 

### of the date of this order, of the name, State Bar number, address, and telephone number of new counsel. We specifically notify appellants, American National Development, L.P. and Dibold American Development, LLC, that because they are corporations, they may only appear in this Court through an attorney. See Kunstoplast of Am., Inc. v. Formosa Plastics Corp., 

### 937 S.W.2d 455,456 (Tex. 1996) (per curiam). Accordingly, if we do not receive the information regarding new counsel within the time specified,we will dismiss the appeal as to appellants, American National Development, L.P. and Dibold

American Development, LLC. If the Court does not receive a response from appellant Bill Baldwin regarding new counsel within the time specified, the Court will assume Mr. Baldwin is proceeding pro se. We 

### DIRECT the Clerk of this Court to send a copy of this order by first class mail to appellants at the following address: Mr. Bill Baldwin 4024 Treemont Circle Colleyville, Texas 76034
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 301 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 301

              Providing for the consideration of H.R. 325.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 23, 1999

 Mr. Bonior submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                         the Committee on Rules

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
              Providing for the consideration of H.R. 325.

    Resolved, That immediately upon the adoption of this resolution the 
House shall resolve into the Committee of the Whole House on the state 
of the Union for consideration of the bill (H.R. 325) to amend the Fair 
Labor Standards Act of 1938 to increase the Federal minimum wage. The 
first reading of the bill shall be dispensed with. All points of order 
against consideration of the bill are waived. General debate shall be 
confined to the bill and shall not exceed 2 hours, equally divided and 
controlled by the Chairman and Ranking Member of the Committee on 
Education and the Workforce. After general debate the bill shall be 
considered for amendment under the five-minute rule. The bill shall be 
considered as read. At the conclusion of consideration of the bill for 
amendment the Committee shall rise and report the bill to the House 
with such amendments as may have been adopted. The previous question 
shall be considered as ordered on the bill and amendments thereto to 
final passage without intervening motion except one motion to recommit 
with instructions.
    Sec. 2. (a) The Clerk shall not prepare the engrossment of H.R. 325 
until the 30th calendar day following its passage. If, before such 30th 
calendar day, the House has passed a bill introduced by Representative 
Rangel of New York and Representative Tanner of Tennessee relating to 
tax relief for small businesses, then the Clerk shall prepare 
immediately the engrossment of H.R. 325 in the form described in 
subsection (b).
    (b) If the bill described in subsection (a) is passed by the House 
within the time period described in subsection (a), the Clerk, in the 
engrossment of H.R. 325, shall--
            (1) add at the end of the text of H.R. 325, as passed by 
        the House, the text of the bill described in subsection (a), as 
        passed by the House;
            (2) conform the title of H.R. 325 to reflect the addition 
        of the bill described in subsection (a) to its engrossment;
            (3) assign appropriate designations to provisions within 
        the engrossment; and
            (4) conform provisions for short titles within the 
        engrossment.
    (c) Upon the addition of its text to the engrossment of H.R. 325, 
the bill described in subsection (a) shall be laid on the table.
                                 <all>
```
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Yokota Airlifts Supplies to Guam After Typhoon Mawar 

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More
#### Arnold Chambless v. The State.

No. 22881.

Delivered June 7, 1944.

The opinion states the case.

*384
      *J. Walter Friberg,*of Wichita Falls, for appellant.

*Ernest S. Goens,*State’s Attorney, of Austin, for the State.

HAWKINS, Presiding Judge.

Conviction is for selling whisky in a dry area, punishment assessed at a fine of $250.00 and* 60 days in jail.

A recital of the facts is not necessary. The appellant did not testify.

Our State’s Attorney confesses error on the complaint that the jury discussed and considered the failure of appellant to testify. We agree with him in his conclusion. See Art. 710 C. C. P.; Harrell v. State, 118 Tex. Cr. R. 279, 42 S. W. (2d) 438.

We are also of opinion that bill of exception number four presents reversible error. Two State’s' witnesses "testified to the sale by appellant of the whisky. No other parties were present. The County Attorney in his argument said there was no “word of testimony to deny that this sale was made” just as State witnesses had testified. No one could have denied it save appellant. This was an indirect reference to the failure of appellant to testify. Scarbrough v. State, 98 Tex. Cr. R. 54, 263 S. W. 917; Wood v. State, 116 Tex. Cr. R. 336, 28 S. W. (2d) 130. We quote from Gothard v. State, 99 Tex. Cr. R. 452, 270 S. W. 177:

> “ * * * where a'defendant has npt testified himself ner offered any defensive testimony whatever it would be well for counsel representing the state to confine himself to a discussion of the evidence introduced by-the state, and not allude to defendant’s failure to produce evidence, unless it is apparent from the record fhat evidence other than his own was available which he neglected to bring before the jury.”

The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.
#### The Music Trades Company, Respondent, v. The Musical Courier Company, and Marc A. Blumenberg, Appellants.

Judgment affirmed, with costs, with leave to defendant to amend on payment of costs. Ho opinion.
EXHIBIT 35.1





SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT





I, Lonni L. Dieck, certify that:





(a) A review of AEP Texas Inc.’s (the “Servicer”) activities during the reporting period covered by this Report on Form 10-K and of its performance under that certain Transition Property Servicing Agreement dated as of March 14, 2012 between AEP Texas Central Transition Funding III LLC, as the Issuing Entity, and the Servicer (the "Servicing Agreement") has been made under my supervision.





(b) To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Servicing Agreement in all material respects throughout the reporting period.





Date: March 23, 2018








/s/ Lonni L. Dieck


Name:  Lonni L. Dieck


Title: Treasurer and Senior Officer in Charge of


the Servicing Function, AEP Texas Inc., as Servicer
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 129 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                        March 24, 1999.
    Resolved,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF SELECT COMMITTEE.

    Section 2(f)(1) of House Resolution 5, One Hundred Sixth Congress, agreed to 
January 6, 1999, is amended by striking ``April 1, 1999'' and inserting ``April 
30, 1999 (or, if earlier, the date on which the Select Committee completes its 
activities)''.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
§ 162.242 How will BIA decide whether to approve an amendment to an agricultural lease? We will approve an agricultural lease amendment if: ( a ) The required consents have been obtained from the parties to the lease under § 162.230 and any sureties; and
( b ) We find the amendment to be in the best interest of the Indian landowners, under the standards set forth in § 162.213 of this subpart.
# C_2013373EN.01002001.xml

| 20.12.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 373/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.12.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 373/20

---

Notice for the attention of the persons to whom restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2011/72/CFSP and Council Regulation (EU) No 101/2011 concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Tunisia apply

2013/C 373/07

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

The following information is brought to the attention of the persons that appear in the Annex to Council Decision 2011/72/CFSP (1), and in Annex I to Council Regulation (EU) No 101/2011 (2), concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Tunisia.

1

2

The Council intends to amend the statements of reasons for the persons appearing in the entries in the Annex to Council Decision 2011/72/CFSP and in Annex I to Council Regulation (EU) No 101/2011, with the exception of entries no. 1, 4, 5, 25 and 46, to read as follows:

‘Person subject to judicial investigations by the Tunisian authorities for complicity in the misappropriation of public monies by a public office-holder, complicity in the misuse of office by a public office-holder to procure an unjustified advantage for a third party and to cause a loss to the administration, and complicity in the exerting wrongful influence over a public office-holder with a view to obtaining directly or indirectly an advantage for another person.’

The Council intends to amend the statement of reasons for the person appearing in entry no 1 in the Annex to Council Decision 2011/72/CFSP and in Annex I to Council Regulation (EU) No 101/2011, to read as follows:

‘Person subject to judicial investigations by the Tunisian authorities for misappropriation of public monies by a public office-holder, misuse of office by a public office-holder to procure an unjustified advantage for a third party and to cause a loss to the administration, and for exerting wrongful influence over a public office-holder with a view to obtaining directly or indirectly an advantage for another person.’

The persons concerned may submit observations to the Council, together with supporting documentation, by 7 January 2014, to the following address:

| Council of the European Union |
| --- |
| General Secretariat |
| DG C 1C |
| Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175 |
| 1048 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |
| E-mail: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu |

Council of the European Union

General Secretariat

DG C 1C

Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175

1048 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

E-mail: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu

Any observations received will be taken into account for the purpose of the Council's periodic review, in accordance with Article 5 of Decision 2011/72/CFSP and Article 12(4) of Regulation (EU) No 101/2011.

---

(1)  OJ L 28, 2.2.2011, p. 62.

1

(2)  OJ L 31, 5.2.2011, p. 1.

2

---
§ 169.305 Will BIA require an appeal bond for an appeal of a decision on a right-of-way document? ( a ) If a party appeals our decision on a right-of-way document, then the official to whom the appeal is made may require the appellant to post an appeal bond in accordance with part 2 of this chapter. We will not require an appeal bond if the tribe is a party to the appeal and requests a waiver of the appeal bond.
( b ) The appellant may not appeal the appeal bond decision. The appellant may, however, request that the official to whom the appeal is made reconsider the bond decision, based on extraordinary circumstances. Any reconsideration decision is final for the Department.
§ 183.5 What documents must the Tribe submit to request money from the Trust Fund? To request a distribution of principal or income from the Trust Fund, the Tribe must submit to us all of the following documents. ( a ) A certified copy of a duly enacted resolution of the Tribal Council requesting a distribution from the Trust Fund;
( b ) A written budget and supporting documentation, approved by the Tribal Council, showing precisely how the tribe will spend the money, including what amounts should come from principal and what amounts should come from income;
( c ) A pro forma budget for each identified economic development project, and a program budget for each identified community development project; and
( d ) A certification stating that the Tribe will use the funds in accordance with budgets submitted under this section.
# C_2013167EN.01000601.xml

| 13.6.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 167/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.6.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 167/6

---

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the TFEU

Cases where the Commission raises no objections

(Text with EEA relevance, except for products falling under Annex I to the Treaty)

2013/C 167/02

| Date of adoption of the decision | 15.5.2013 |
| --- | --- |
| Reference number of State Aid | SA.36009 (13/N) |
| Member State | France |
| Region | — | — |
| Title (and/or name of the beneficiary) | Aide à la cessation d'activité laitière |
| Legal basis | — | articles D. 654-88-1 à D. 654-88-8 du code rural et de la pêche maritime |

Date of adoption of the decision

15.5.2013

Reference number of State Aid

SA.36009 (13/N)

Member State

France

Region

—

—

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

Aide à la cessation d'activité laitière

Legal basis

—

articles D. 654-88-1 à D. 654-88-8 du code rural et de la pêche maritime

| — | arrêté du 26 août 2010 relatif à l’octroi d’une indemnité à l’abandon total ou partiel de la production laitière et à la mise en œuvre d’un dispositif spécifique de transfert de quotas laitiers pour les campagnes 2010-2011 à 2013-2014 |
| --- | --- |

—

arrêté du 26 août 2010 relatif à l’octroi d’une indemnité à l’abandon total ou partiel de la production laitière et à la mise en œuvre d’un dispositif spécifique de transfert de quotas laitiers pour les campagnes 2010-2011 à 2013-2014

| — | arrêté du 30 mars 2011 modifiant l'arrêté du 26 août 2010 relatif à l’octroi d’une indemnité à l’abandon total ou partiel de la production laitière et à la mise en œuvre d’un dispositif spécifique de transfert de quotas laitiers pour les campagnes 2010-2011 à 2013-2014 |
| --- | --- |

—

arrêté du 30 mars 2011 modifiant l'arrêté du 26 août 2010 relatif à l’octroi d’une indemnité à l’abandon total ou partiel de la production laitière et à la mise en œuvre d’un dispositif spécifique de transfert de quotas laitiers pour les campagnes 2010-2011 à 2013-2014

Type of measure

Scheme

—

Objective

Closing capacity

Form of aid

Direct grant

Budget

| | Overall budget: EUR 40 million |
| --- | --- |

Overall budget: EUR 40 million

| | Annual budget: EUR 40 million |
| --- | --- |

Annual budget: EUR 40 million

Intensity

Measure does not constitute aid

Duration (period)

Until 31.3.2014

Economic sectors

Agriculture, forestry and fishing

Name and address of the granting authority

| Ministère de l'agriculture, de l'agroalimentaire et de la forêt |
| --- |
| 3 rue Barbet de Jouy |
| 75349 Paris 07 SP |
| FRANCE |

Ministère de l'agriculture, de l'agroalimentaire et de la forêt

3 rue Barbet de Jouy

75349 Paris 07 SP

FRANCE

Other information

—

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

http://ec.europa.eu/competition/elojade/isef/index.cfm

---
§ 151.10 How will the Secretary evaluate a request involving land contiguous to the boundaries of an Indian reservation? ( a ) The Secretary shall consider the criteria in this section when evaluating requests for the acquisition of land in trust status when the land is located contiguous to an Indian reservation: ( 1 ) The existence of statutory authority for the acquisition and any limitations contained in such authority;
( 2 ) If the applicant is an individual Indian, the need for additional land, the amount of trust or restricted land already owned by or for that individual, and the degree to which the individual needs assistance in handling their affairs;
( 3 ) The purposes for which the land will be used; and
( 4 ) If the land to be acquired is in fee status, whether the Bureau of Indian Affairs is equipped to discharge the additional responsibilities resulting from the acquisition of the land in trust status.
( b ) The Secretary shall give great weight to acquiring land that serves any of the following purposes, in accordance with § 151.3: ( 1 ) Furthers Tribal interests by establishing a Tribal land base or protects Tribal homelands;
( 2 ) Protects sacred sites or cultural resources and practices;
( 3 ) Establishes or maintains conservation or environmental mitigation areas;
( 4 ) Consolidates land ownership;
( 5 ) Reduces checkerboarding;
( 6 ) Acquires land lost through allotment;
( 7 ) Protects treaty or subsistence rights; or
( 8 ) Facilitates Tribal self-determination, economic development, or Indian housing.
( c ) When reviewing a Tribe's request for land contiguous to an Indian reservation, the Secretary presumes that the acquisition will further the Tribal interests described in paragraph (b) of this section, and adverse impacts to local governments' regulatory jurisdiction, real property taxes, and special assessments will be minimal, therefore the application should be approved.
( d ) Upon receipt of a written request to have land contiguous to an Indian reservation acquired in trust status, the Secretary shall notify the State and local governments with regulatory jurisdiction over the land to be acquired. The notice will inform the State or local government that each will be given 30 calendar days in which to provide written comments to rebut the presumption of minimal adverse impacts to regulatory jurisdiction, real property taxes, and special assessments. If the State or local government responds within 30 calendar days, a copy of the comments will be provided to the applicant, who will be given a reasonable time in which to reply, if they choose to do so in their discretion, or request that the Secretary issue a decision. In considering such comments, the Secretary presumes that the Tribal community will benefit from the acquisition.
### Gravity and aeromagnetic study of part of the Yakima River basin, Washington

By: S. L. RobbinsDean O. GreggR.J. Burt

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/pp726E

#### Links

- More information:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**                            (html)
-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plate:  **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
<PAGE>   1

                                  EXHIBIT 23.1
                                FUTURELINK CORP.


                          o ERNST & YOUNG, LLP             o Phone: 403 290-4100
                            CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS.           Fax:   403 290-4265
                            Ernst & Young House
                            1300, 707 - 7 Avenue SW
                            Calgary, Alberta, Canada
                            T2P 3H6



                  CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 333-84679) pertaining to the Stock Option Plan of FutureLink Corp. of
our report dated November 16, 1999 (except for Notes 21(g) and (h) which are as
at January 13, 2000) on the consolidated financial statements of Futurelink
Corp. as at September 30, 1999 and December 31, 1998 and for the nine month
period ended September 30, 1999 in the Form 10-QSB/A dated January 24, 2000
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.





                                                          /s/ Ernst & Young, LLP

Calgary, Canada
January 24, 2000                                          Chartered Accountants