alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
H. Res. 280

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

June 12, 2000.

Whereas one of every two marriages ends in divorce;

Whereas children living with a single mother are six times

more likely to live in poverty than are children whose

parents are married;

Whereas married adults, on average, live longer, have fewer

emotional problems, and are less likely to engage in alcohol or drug abuse;

Whereas visionary communities have adopted community

marriage policies to empower couples for healthy, lifelong

marriage and to foster an environment that has the

greatest likelihood of ensuring the well-being of our citizens, especially our children;

Whereas a community marriage policy is a set of guidelines

for premarital preparation and community support for

marriage to which individuals, the community, clergy,

and congregations voluntarily commit; and

Whereas a successful community marriage policy is one that

urges clergy, congregations, and the broader community

to—

(1) encourage premarital preparation education;

(2) train mature married couples to serve as mentors to the newly married;
2

•HRES 280 EH

(3) evaluate current practices that may unwittingly

undermine marriage formation and stability;

(4) implement policies that promote marriage; and

(5) volunteer time, expertise, and resources to support initiatives that promote marriage and stable families: Now, therefore, be it

Resolved, That the House of Representatives—

(1) recognizes the importance of strong marriages

for a strong society;

(2) commends communities that have established

community marriage policies for their efforts to support

marriage and prevent the problems of divorce; and

(3) encourages other communities in the United

States to develop voluntary community marriage policies

to enable community members, such as clergy, business

leaders, public officials, and health professionals, to work

together to strengthen marriages and provide stable environments for children.

Attest:

Clerk.
#### § 215.15 Leases to be accompanied by Form D.

Lead and zinc leases should be accompanied, when filed, with application for approval (Form D)[1] made under oath, and said application shall set forth the information therein required.

###### Footnotes -
  215.15

[1] For further information concerning forms, see § 215.19.
### §2245. Use of aircraft for proficiency flying: limitation

(a) An aircraft under the jurisdiction of a military department may not be used by a member of the armed forces for the purpose of proficiency flying except in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of Defense.

(b) Such regulations—

(1) may not require proficiency flying by a member except to the extent required for the member to maintain flying proficiency in anticipation of the member's assignment to combat operations; and

(2) may not permit proficiency flying in the case of a member who is assigned to a course of instruction of 90 days or more.

(c) In this section, the term "proficiency flying" means flying performed under competent orders by a rated or designated member of the armed forces while serving in a non-aviation assignment or in an assignment in which skills would normally not be maintained in the performance of assigned duties.

(Added Pub. L. 101–510, div. A, title XIV, §1481(e)(1), Nov. 5, 1990, 104 Stat. 1706; amended Pub. L. 110–181, div. A, title X, §1077, Jan. 28, 2008, 122 Stat. 333.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

Provisions similar to those in this section were contained in Pub. L. 101–165, title IX, §9006, Nov. 21, 1989, 103 Stat. 1130, which was set out as a note under section 2241 of this title, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 101–510, §1481(e)(3).

#### Amendments

2008—Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 110–181 amended subsec. (c) generally. Prior to amendment, subsec. (c) read as follows: "In this section, the term 'proficiency flying' has the meaning given that term in Department of Defense Directive 1340.4."
Exhibit

32.1



CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In

connection with the Annual Report of One 4 Art Limited (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended November 30, 2022,

as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, David Lazar, Chief Executive Officer

of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The

    Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                   
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     |                                                                                                                                                              
| | (2) | The

    information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of

    the Company.



|Dated:

    March 15, 2023 | By: | /s/ David Lazar                                                        
|-------------------------- | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------
|                           |     | Chief

                                            Executive Officer   
|                           |     | (Principal

    Executive Officer and Principal

    Financial Officer)
Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certification.

 

I, Anthony Sfarra, certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of the WFRBS Commercial Mortgage Trust 2012-C6 (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");

 

2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

 

4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreements in all material respects; and

 

5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

 

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:

 

Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, as Special Servicer, Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as Trustee, Pentalpha Surveillance LLC, as Trust Advisor, CoreLogic Commercial Real Estate Services, Inc., as Servicing Function Participant, National Tax Search, LLC, as Servicing Function Participant, and Prudential Asset Resources, Inc., as Primary Servicer.

 

Dated: March 30, 2015

 

/s/ Anthony Sfarra Signature 

President

(senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor)
## In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02

- 23

- 00010

- CR

J ACOB T URNER

, Appellant

V

.

T HE S TATE OF T EXAS §

§

§

§

§

§ On Ap peal from Criminal District Court

No. 1

o f Tarrant County ( 1684372D )

September 7 , 2023

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Walker

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there

was no error in the t ri al court ’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of the trial

court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By /s/ Br ian Walker

Justice Brian Walker
# C_2017378EN.01029801.xml

| 9.11.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 378/298 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.11.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 378/298

---

P7_TA(2014)0183

Nagoya Protocol on Access to Genetic Resources ***

European Parliament legislative resolution of 11 March 2014 on the draft Council decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the European Union, of the Nagoya Protocol on Access to Genetic Resources and the Fair and Equitable Sharing of Benefits Arising from their Utilization to the Convention on Biological Diversity (06852/2013 — C7-0005/2014 — 2012/0279(NLE))

(Consent)

(2017/C 378/37)

The European Parliament,

The European Parliament

| — | having regard to the draft Council Decision (06852/2013), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the draft Council Decision (06852/2013),

| — | having regard to the Nagoya Protocol on Access to Genetic Resources and the Fair and Equitable Sharing of Benefits Arising from their Utilization to the Convention on Biological Diversity, attached to the above-mentioned draft Council decision, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the Nagoya Protocol on Access to Genetic Resources and the Fair and Equitable Sharing of Benefits Arising from their Utilization to the Convention on Biological Diversity, attached to the above-mentioned draft Council decision,

| — | having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Article 192(1) and Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (a), of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C7-0005/2014), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Article 192(1) and Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (a), of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C7-0005/2014),

| — | having regard to Rules 81 and 90(7) of its Rules of Procedure, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Rules 81 and 90(7) of its Rules of Procedure,

| — | having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety and the opinions of the Committee on Development and the Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development (A7-0061/2014), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety and the opinions of the Committee on Development and the Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development (A7-0061/2014),

| 1. | Consents to conclusion of the Protocol; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Consents to conclusion of the Protocol;

| 2. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States.

---
# C_2017093EN.01026001.xml

| 24.3.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 93/260 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.3.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 93/260

---

P7_TA(2014)0080

Authorising Member States to ratify, in the interests of the European Union, the Arms Trade Treaty ***

European Parliament legislative resolution of 5 February 2014 on the draft Council decision authorising Member States to ratify, in the interests of the European Union, the Arms Trade Treaty (12178/2013 — C7-0233/2013 — 2013/0225(NLE))

(Consent)

(2017/C 093/49)

The European Parliament,

The European Parliament

| — | having regard to the draft Council decision (12178/2013), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the draft Council decision (12178/2013),

| — | having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Articles 114 and 207(3) and Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (a) (v), of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C7-0233/2013), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Articles 114 and 207(3) and Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (a) (v), of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C7-0233/2013),

| — | having regard to Rules 81 and 90(7) of its Rules of Procedure, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Rules 81 and 90(7) of its Rules of Procedure,

| — | having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on International Trade and the opinion of the Committee on Foreign Affairs (A7-0041/2014), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on International Trade and the opinion of the Committee on Foreign Affairs (A7-0041/2014),

| 1. | Consents to the draft Council decision; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Consents to the draft Council decision;

| 2. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States.

---
EXHIBIT 32.2  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with the Annual Report of Ameri Metro, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended July 31, 2013 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:  1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.  3. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.  Date: November 12, 2013By:/s/ Naresh MirchandaniNaresh MirchandaniChief Financial Officer
### §7152. General officers: title of office

An officer holding an appointment as a general officer in the Regular Army may be called a general officer in the Regular Army. In addition, a general officer of the Regular Army in the Medical Corps, Dental Corps, Veterinary Corps, Judge Advocate General's Corps, or the Chaplains, may be called a general officer of that branch.

(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 181, §3282; renumbered §7152, Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, §808(b)(3), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1838.)

| Revised section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 3282 | 10:506(b) (less 2d sentence). | Aug. 7, 1947, ch. 512, §502(b) (less 2d sentence), 61 Stat. 884. |

The words "may be called" are substituted for the words "shall be known as" and "may be specifically referred to". The words "of that branch" are substituted for the enumeration of branches.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–232 renumbered section 3282 of this title as this section.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2018 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 115–232 effective Feb. 1, 2019, with provision for the coordination of amendments and special rule for certain redesignations, see section 800 of Pub. L. 115–232, set out as a note preceding section 3001 of this title.
EXHIBIT 32. - Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

                    CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Australian-Canadian Oil
Royalties Ltd. (the "Company") for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2011, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), Andre Sakhai, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
and Mahnaz Nourmand, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of their knowledge, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.

Dated: May 6, 2011             /s/ ANDRE SAKHAI
                               -------------------------------------------------
                               Andre Sakhai, President & Chief Executive Officer

Dated: May 6, 2011             /s/ MAHNAZ NOURMAND
                               -------------------------------------------------
                               Mahnaz Nourmand, Chief Financial Officer

This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsUsing Model-Based Systems Engineering To Provide Artifacts for NASA Project Life-Cycle and Technical ReviewsThe ability of systems engineers to use model-based systems engineering (MBSE) to generate self-consistent, up-to-date systems engineering products for project life-cycle and technical reviews is an important aspect for the continued and accelerated acceptance of MBSE. Currently, many review products are generated using labor-intensive, error-prone approaches based on documents, spreadsheets, and chart sets; a promised benefit of MBSE is that users will experience reductions in inconsistencies and errors. This work examines features of SysML that can be used to generate systems engineering products. Model elements, relationships, tables, and diagrams are identified for a large number of the typical systems engineering artifacts. A SysML system model can contain and generate most systems engineering products to a significant extent and this paper provides a guide on how to use MBSE to generate products for project life-cycle and technical reviews. The use of MBSE can reduce the schedule impact usually experienced for review preparation, as in many cases the review products can be auto-generated directly from the system model. These approaches are useful to systems engineers, project managers, review board members, and other key project stakeholders.Document ID20170010415Acquisition SourceGlenn Research CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsParrott, Edith L.*(NASA Glenn Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)*Weiland, Karen J.*(NASA Glenn Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)*Date AcquiredOctober 31, 2017Publication DateOctober 1, 2017Subject CategoryEngineering (General)Report/Patent NumberE-19423NASA/TM-2017-219575GRC-E-DAA-TN46590AIAA-2017-5299Funding Number(s)WBS: WBS 729200.02.03.03Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.KeywordsSE ProductNPR 7123.1BMBSEAvailable DownloadsNameType20170010415.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsIDRelationTitle20170009965See AlsoUsing Model-Based Systems Engineering to Provide Artifacts for NASA Project Life-cycle and Technical Reviewsvisibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
**EXHIBIT 32.2– CFO Certification**

 

**SATELLITE NEWSPAPERS CORP.**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADDED BY**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Satellite Newspapers Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Randy Hibma, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss. 1350, as added by ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.         The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.         The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered by the Report.

 

By: /s/ Randy Hibma

Randy Hibma

Chief Financial Officer

 

August 21, 2006

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 ("Section 906"), or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Satellite Newspapers Corp., and will be retained by Heartland, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
From: "Cassidy Mike" <MICHAEL.CASSIDY@kohler.com>

To: Jeff Telander/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 12/02/2010 03:38 PM

Subject: Clay MACT ICR Kohle r Co. Spartanburg SC Test Report

Attachments: img

- Z021437

- 0001.pdf

Jeff,

I received the attached revised pages for the Spartanburg test report from ARI today. Please replace the

affected pages in the current report with these new pages, and contact me if any questions.

Michael J. Cassidy

EHS Specialist

Kohler Co.

444 Highland Drive

Mail Stop 009

Kohler, WI 53044

p. (920) 457

- 4441, x 77263

f. (920) 459

- 1682

mike.cassidy@kohler.com

Save money. Save water. Support Habitat for Humanity. Visit

www.SaveWaterAme rica.com
### §2125. Members of the program: exclusion from authorized strengths

Notwithstanding any other provision of law, members of the program shall not be counted against any prescribed military strengths.

(Added Pub. L. 92–426, §2(a), Sept. 21, 1972, 86 Stat. 718.)