alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
H. Res. 142

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

April 21, 1999.

Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule

XVIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee of the

Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of

the bill (H.R. 1184) to authorize appropriations for carrying

out the Earthquake Hazards Reduction Act of 1977 for fiscal

years 2000 and 2001, and for other purposes. The first reading of the bill shall be dispensed with. Points of order against

consideration of the bill for failure to comply with clause 4(a)

of rule XIII are waived. General debate shall be confined to

the bill and shall not exceed one hour equally divided and

controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of

the Committee on Science. After general debate the bill shall

be considered for amendment under the five-minute rule. It

shall be in order to consider as an original bill for the purpose of amendment under the five-minute rule the amendment in the nature of a substitute recommended by the Committee on Science now printed in the bill. Each section of the
2

•HRES 142 EH

committee amendment in the nature of a substitute shall be

considered as read. During consideration of the bill for

amendment, the Chairman of the Committee of the Whole

may accord priority in recognition on the basis of whether the

Member offering an amendment has caused it to be printed

in the portion of the Congressional Record designated for

that purpose in clause 8 of the rule XVIII. Amendments so

printed shall be considered as read. The Chairman of the

Committee of the Whole may: (1) postpone until a time during further consideration in the Committee of the Whole a request for a recorded vote on any amendment; and (2) reduce

to five minutes the minimum time for electronic voting on

any postponed question that follows another electronic vote

without intervening business, provided that the minimum

time for electronic voting on the first in any series of questions shall be 15 minutes. At the conclusion of consideration

of the bill for amendment the Committee shall rise and report

the bill to the House with such amendments as may have

been adopted. Any Member may demand a separate vote in

the House on any amendment adopted in the Committee of

the Whole to the bill or to the committee amendment in the

nature of a substitute. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill and amendments thereto to final
3

•HRES 142 EH

passage without intervening motion except one motion to recommit with or without instructions.

Attest:

Clerk.
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 34 (Friday, February 18, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 9586]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-3778]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health & Human 
Development; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Child Health and Human 
Development Initial Review Group; Function, Integration, and 
Rehabilitation Sciences Subcommittee.
    Date: March 22, 2011.
    Time: 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Hilton Washington/Rockville, 1750 Rockville Pike, 
Rockville, MD 20852.
    Contact Person: Anne Krey, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, 
Division of Scientific Review, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National 
Institute of Child Health and Human Development, NIH, 6100 Executive 
Blvd., Room 5b01, Bethesda, MD 20892. 301-435-6908. <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#0d6c66393c624d636465236a627b"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="abcac09f9ac4ebc5c2c385ccc4dd">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.864, 
Population Research; 93.865, Research for Mothers and Children; 
93.929, Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research; 93.209, 
Contraception and Infertility Loan Repayment Program, National 
Institutes of Health, HHS)


    Dated: February 14, 2011.
Jennifer S. Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2011-3778 Filed 2-17-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
§ 171.230 What are my responsibilities for wastewater? ( a ) You are responsible for your wastewater.
( b ) Wastewater may be returned to our facilities, but only at locations we designate, in a manner we approve, and at your cost.
( c ) You must not allow your wastewater to flow or collect on our facilities or roads, except at locations we designate and in a manner we approve.
( d ) If you fail to comply with this section, we may withhold services to you.
§ 166.908 Who can participate in continuing education and training? ( a ) The purpose of continuing education and training is to establish a program to provide for the ongoing education and training of natural resources and agriculture personnel employed by approved organizations. This program will emphasize continuing education and training in three areas: ( 1 ) Orientation training including tribal-federal relations and responsibilities;
( 2 ) Technical agriculture education; and
( 3 ) Developmental training in agriculture-based enterprises and marketing.
( b ) We will maintain an orientation program to increase awareness and understanding of Indian culture and its effect on natural resources management and agriculture practices and on federal laws that effect natural resources management and agriculture operations and administration in the Indian agriculture program.
( c ) We will maintain a continuing technical natural resources and agriculture education program to assist natural resources managers and agriculture-related professionals to perform natural resources and agriculture management on Indian land.
( d ) We will maintain an agriculture land-based enterprise and marketing training program to assist with the development and use of Indian and Alaska Native agriculture resources.
#### William Bryan, Respondent, v. Samuel Weiss, Appellant.

Judgment and order unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Woodward,Jenks, Hooker, Rich and Miller, JJ.
§ 162.533 Must a WEEL lease document be recorded? ( a ) Any WEEL lease document must be recorded in our LTRO with jurisdiction over the leased land. ( 1 ) We will record the lease document immediately following our approval.
( 2 ) If our approval of an assignment or sublease is not required, the parties must record the assignment or sublease in the LTRO with jurisdiction over the leased land.
( b ) The tribe must record lease documents for the following types of leases in the LTRO with jurisdiction over the tribal lands, even though BIA approval is not required: ( 1 ) Leases of tribal land that a corporate entity leases to a third party under 25 U.S.C. 477; and
( 2 ) Leases of tribal land under a special act of Congress authorizing leases without our approval.
#### § 1187.40 How long is the grant term?

Each grant awarded under the IBIP is for a term of three years.
EXHIBIT 34.1





ATTESTATION REPORT ON ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH SERVICING


CRITERIA FOR


ASSET-BACKED SECURITIES OF DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP


ON BEHALF OF AEP TEXAS CENTRAL COMPANY, AS SERVICER





REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





Board of Directors and Shareholder of


AEP Texas Central Company


Columbus, Ohio


We have examined management’s assertion, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Assessment of Compliance with SEC Regulation AB Servicing Criteria, that AEP Texas Central Company (the Company) complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission's Regulation AB for the Senior Secured Transition Bonds (the "Securities”) as of and for the year ended December 31, 2014, excluding criteria 1122(d)(1)(ii), 1122(d)(1)(iii), 1122(d)(1)(iv), 1122(d)(2)(vi), 1122(d)(3)(ii), 1122(d)(4)(iii), 1122(d)(4)(v), 1122(d)(4)(ix), 1122(d)(4)(xi), 1122(d)(4)(xii), 1122(d)(4)(xiii), and 1122(d)(4)(xv), which management has determined are not applicable to the activities performed by the Company with respect to the Securities. Management is responsible for the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management’s assertion about the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria based on our examination.


Our examination was conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the applicable servicing criteria, including tests on a sample basis of the servicing activities related to the Securities, determining whether the Company performed those selected activities in compliance with the servicing criteria during the specified period, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our procedures were limited to selected servicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report and, accordingly, such samples may not have included servicing activities related to each asset-backed transaction included in the Securities. Further, an examination is not designed to detect noncompliance arising from errors that may have occurred prior to the period specified above that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report.  We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria.


In our opinion, management's assertion that the Company complied with the aforementioned applicable servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2014 for the Senior Secured Transition Bonds is fairly stated, in all material respects.





/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP





March 27, 2015


Columbus, Ohio
### §1076f. TRICARE program: extension of coverage for certain members of the National Guard and dependents during certain disaster response duty

(a) Extended Coverage.—During a period in which a member of the National Guard is performing disaster response duty, the member may be treated as being on active duty for a period of more than 30 days for purposes of the eligibility of the member and dependents of the member for health care benefits under the TRICARE program if such period immediately follows a period in which the member served on full-time National Guard duty under section 502(f) of title 32, including pursuant to chapter 9 of such title, unless the Governor of the State (or, with respect to the District of Columbia, the mayor of the District of Columbia) determines that such extended eligibility is not in the best interest of the member or the State.

(b) Contribution by State.—(1) The Secretary shall charge a State for the costs of providing coverage under the TRICARE program to members of the National Guard of the State and the dependents of the members pursuant to subsection (a). Such charges shall be paid from the funds of the State or from any other non-Federal funds.

(2) Any amounts received by the Secretary under paragraph (1) shall be credited to the appropriation available for the Defense Health Program Account under section 1100 of this title, shall be merged with sums in such Account that are available for the fiscal year in which collected, and shall be available under subsection (b) of such section, including to carry out subsection (a) of this section.

(c) Definitions.—In this section:

(1) The term "disaster response duty" means duty performed by a member of the National Guard in State status pursuant to an emergency declaration by the Governor of the State (or, with respect to the District of Columbia, the mayor of the District of Columbia) in response to a disaster or in preparation for an imminent disaster.

(2) The term "State" means each of the several States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, and any territory or possession of the United States.

(Added Pub. L. 114–328, div. A, title VII, §711(a), Dec. 23, 2016, 130 Stat. 2213.)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> BD
<LEGEND>
THIS SHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME AND CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET OF THE COMPANY'S
QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 1999, AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                         265,730
<RECEIVABLES>                                  139,802
<SECURITIES-RESALE>                                  0
<SECURITIES-BORROWED>                                0
<INSTRUMENTS-OWNED>                            201,768
<PP&E>                                          13,732
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 651,610
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<PAYABLES>                                      63,373
<REPOS-SOLD>                                         0
<SECURITIES-LOANED>                                  0
<INSTRUMENTS-SOLD>                             219,267
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,109
<OTHER-SE>                                     367,861
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   651,610
<TRADING-REVENUE>                              394,988
<INTEREST-DIVIDENDS>                             4,757
<COMMISSIONS>                                    6,966
<INVESTMENT-BANKING-REVENUES>                        0
<FEE-REVENUE>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<COMPENSATION>                                 127,459
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                150,439
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    87,602
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .80
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .77


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 157 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                           May 4, 1999.
Whereas the foundation of American freedom and democracy is a strong, effective 
        system of education in which every child can learn in a safe and 
        nurturing environment;
Whereas a first-rate education system depends on a partnership between parents, 
        principals, teachers, and children;
Whereas much of the success of our Nation during the American Century is the 
        result of the hard work and dedication of teachers across the land;
Whereas, in addition to their families, knowledgeable and skillful teachers can 
        have a profound impact on a child's early development and future 
        success;
Whereas, while many people spend their lives building careers, teachers spend 
        their careers building lives;
Whereas our Nation's teachers serve our children beyond the call of duty as 
        coaches, mentors, and advisors without regard to fame or fortune; and
Whereas across this land nearly 3 million men and women experience the joys of 
        teaching young minds the virtues of reading, writing, and arithmetic: 
        Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) honors and recognizes the unique and important achievements of 
        America's teachers; and
            (2) urges all Americans to take a moment to thank and pay tribute to 
        our Nation's teachers.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
#### NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. GRAND CENTRAL AIRCRAFT CO., Inc., Respondent.

No. 14010.

United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.

Oct. 22, 1954.

*573George J. Bott, General Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate General Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. General Counsel, Edward D. Wilson, Frederick U. Reel, Franklin C. Milliken, Attorneys, N.L.R.B., Washington, D. C., for petitioners.

Latham & Watkins, Richard W. Lund, Richard F. Alden, Los Angeles, Cal., for respondent.

Before STEPHENS and FEE, Circuit Judges, and LING, District Judge.

PER CURIAM.

We are asked by the National Labor Relations Board to order enforced, the board’s order against Grand Central Aircraft Co., Inc. The proceeding is a typical one under authority of the National Labor Relations Act, as amended, 61 Stat. 136, Title 29 U.S.C.A. § 151 et seq., and the board’s “Decision and Order” is reported in 103 N.L.R.B. # 101, inclusive of authorities and applicable sections of the Act. The board found that respondent resisted unionization of its plant: by using its supervisional personnel to influence the employees to vote against unionization by various threats and inducements; by discriminating against certain employees for their pro-union activities; by wage and insurance benefits; by the discharge of employees.

Respondent claims that it did no more in opposition to the unionization of the plant than it had the right to do under § 8(c) of the Act, which guarantees to the employer the right to fairly state and argue its views.

There is substantial evidence to support the Board in its findings on these subjects, notwithstanding substantial evidence to the contrary. We do not find clear error.

Respondent claims that the charging union is “Region No. 6” and that such union has not complied with § 9(f) and (h), (the non-communist oath requirement).

The proceedings were laid and conducted under the complaint of the “International Union, United Automobile, Aircraft and Agricultural Implement Workers of America, CIO (UAW-CIO), Region 6.” It is conceded that the International Union, United Automobile, Aircraft and Agricultural Implement Workers of America, CIO, has complied with the non-communist oath; “Region 6” separately has not.

Subsequently to the original Decision and Order of the board, the board amended the proceeding including the Decision and Order by deleting the expression “Region 6”.

The evidence showed the expression “Region 6” means the geographical division of the International Union, United Automobile, Aircraft and Agricultural Implement Workers of America, CIO (UAW-CIO), and is not itself a union.

The Decision and Order under the original order was, and the supplemental or amended Decision and Order is valid. The petition is granted.
##### 



MIDLAND CAPITAL HOLDINGS CORPORATION
 EXHIBIT 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date:  February 14, 2006
    BY:
    /s/ Paul ZogasPaul ZogasPresident, Chief Executive Officer
and Chief Financial Officer
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
1226 CAF 13-00870 PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., CENTRA, LINDLEY, SCONIERS, AND VALENTINO, JJ.

IN THE MATTER OF MARY L. KESSLER, PETITIONER,
V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER SCOTT M. FANCHER, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.

--------------------------------------------- SCOTT A. OTIS, ATTORNEY FOR THE CHILDREN, APPELLANT. (APPEAL NO. 1.)

SCOTT A. OTIS, WATERTOWN, APPELLANT PRO SE. MARY L. KESSLER, PETITIONER PRO SE. SCOTT M. FANCHER, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT PRO SE.
Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Jefferson County (Peter A. Schwerzmann, A.J.), entered September 10, 2012 in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 8. The order dismissed the petition for an order of protection. It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs. Same Memorandum as in Matter of Kessler v Fancher ([appeal No. 2] ___ AD3d ___ [Dec. 27, 2013]).

Entered: December 27, 2013 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
### §1073f. Health care fraud and abuse prevention program

(a) Program Authorized.—(1) The Secretary of Defense may carry out a program under this section to prevent and remedy fraud and abuse in the health care programs of the Department of Defense.

(2) At the discretion of the Secretary, such program may be administered jointly by the Inspector General of the Department of Defense and the Director of the Defense Health Agency.

(3) In carrying out such program, the authorities granted to the Secretary of Defense and the Inspector General of the Department of Defense under section 1128A(m) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1320a–7a(m)) shall be available to the Secretary and the Inspector General.

(b) Civil Monetary Penalties.—(1) Except as provided in paragraph (2), the provisions of section 1128A of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1320a–7a) shall apply with respect to any civil monetary penalty imposed in carrying out the program authorized under subsection (a).

(2) Consistent with section 1079a of this title, amounts recovered in connection with any such civil monetary penalty imposed—

(A) shall be credited to appropriations available as of the time of the collection for expenses of the health care program of the Department of Defense affected by the fraud and abuse for which such penalty was imposed; and

(B) may be used to support the administration of the program authorized under subsection (a), including to support any interagency agreements entered into under subsection (d).

(c) Interagency Agreements.—The Secretary of Defense may enter into agreements with the Secretary of Health and Human Services, the Attorney General, or the heads of other Federal agencies, for the effective and efficient implementation of the program authorized under subsection (a).

(d) Rule of Construction.—Joint administration of the program authorized under subsection (a) may not be construed as limiting the authority of the Inspector General of the Department of Defense under any other provision of law.

(e) Fraud and Abuse Defined.—In this section, the term "fraud and abuse" means any conduct specified in subsection (a) or (b) of section 1128A of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1320a–7a).

(Added Pub. L. 117–81, div. A, title VII, §713(a), Dec. 27, 2021, 135 Stat. 1784.)