alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 99.7**

 

 

MANAGEMENT’S RESPONSIBILITY FOR FINANCIAL INFORMATION

 

Sprott Asset Management LP, the “Manager” of the Sprott Physical Platinum and Palladium Trust (the “Trust”) is responsible for the integrity, consistency, objectivity and reliability of the Financial Statements of the Trust. International Financial Reporting Standards have been applied and management has exercised its judgment and made best estimates where appropriate.

 

The Manager’s internal controls and supporting procedures maintained provide reasonable assurance that financial records are complete and accurate. These supporting procedures include the oversight of RBC Investor Services, the Trust’s valuation agent.

 

Management has assessed the effectiveness of the internal controls over financial reporting as at December 31, 2014 using the framework found in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based upon this assessment, management has concluded that as at December 31, 2014 the Manager’s internal controls over financial reporting were effective.

 

Ernst & Young LLP, the independent auditors appointed by the Manager of the Trust, have audited the effectiveness of the Trust’s internal control over financial reporting as at December 31, 2014 in addition to auditing the Trust’s Financial Statements as of the same date. Their reports, which expressed an unqualified opinion, can be found on pages 2 to 3 of the Financial Statements. Ernst & Young have full and free access to, and meet periodically with, the Manager of the Trust to discuss their audit and matters arising there from, such as, comments they may have on the fairness of financial reporting and the adequacy of internal controls.

 

Steven Rostowsky

Chief Financial Officer

March 10, 2015

 

1

----
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SS. 1350 ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACTOF 2002**

 

In connection with the Amendment to Annual Report on Form, 10-K(the "Report") of Boreal Water Collection, Inc. (the "Company"), for the year ended December 31, 2012 as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Francine Lavoie, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, herebycertify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.   The Report fully complies with the requirementsof section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.   The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company

 

 

 

/s/ Francine Lavoie

Chief Financial Officer

November 4, 2013
REPUBLICA DE COLOMBIA 

# AERONAUTICA CIVIL Unidad Administrativa Especial Bogota D.C ., Abril 1 3 de 2010 Senor BRIAN HEDBERG , Esq . Negotiator, The Americas U .S . Dept Of Transportation Office of International Aviation Tel. 202.366 .7783 Fax 202 .366 .3694 Estados Un idos Respetado Senor Hedberg : La Aeronautica Civil de Colombia**p~r** solicitud de la aerolinea Tampa Cargo S .A. , la cual se encuentra autorizada para realizar un (1) vuelo charter en la ruta COLOMBIA (Bogota/Medellin/Cali/Barranquilla)-MIAMI-COLOMBIA-BRASIL (Belo Horizonte)- COLOMBIA, ejerciendo derechos de quintas y sextas libertades entre Miami y Belo Horizonte, confirma al Departamento de Transporte de los Estados Unidos de America , que el Gobierno de Colombia podra aprobar, sobre la base de la reciprocidad , las solicitudes de aerolineas de carga de los Estados Unidos, para lIevar a cabo operaciones de vue los charter de trans porte de carga con derechos de trafico de quinta 

### y sexta libertad del aire , en el entendimiento de que el Gobierno de los Estados Unidos apruebe solicitudes similares de aerolineas de carga destinadas**p~r** Colombia. Sin otro particular, reciba un cordial saludo

Jef Oficina de Transporte Aereo Proyect6 : Ma. Isabel Rojas Revis6 : Claudia Esguerra Barragan 

# $
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

                    Notice is hereby given of a change in the telephone Access Code for the meeting of the Interagency Autism Coordinating Committee (IACC) Subcommittee on Safety on January 12, 2011, 11 a.m. to 1 p.m. This meeting is a conference call only. The notice was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on December 29, 2010, 75 FR 82034.                

The Conference Call Access Code was missing one number and should be: Dial 888-456-0356, Access Code: 1427016. The Conference Call meeting is open to the public. The meeting will be held at the same time.

Dated: January 4, 2011.

Jennifer S. Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2011-384 Filed 1-10-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
EXHIBIT 31.2


|CERTIFICATIONAS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                
|I, Kathleen C. Haines, certify that:                                            
|                                                                                
|                                                                                
|                                                                                
|                                                                                
|                                                                                
|                                                                                
|                                                                                
|                                                                                
|                                                                                
|                                                                                
|                                                                                
|                                                                                
|                                                                                
|                                                                                
|                                                                                
|                                                                                
|                                                                                
|                                                                                
|                                                                                

|      |                         |                        
|----- | ----------------------- | -----------------------
|      |                         |                        
|Date: | May
           10, 2004 | By:                    
|      |                         |                        
|      |                         | Kathleen C. Haines     
|      |                         | Senior Vice President, 
|      |                         | Chief Financial Officer
|      |                         | and Treasurer          

2

---
# C_2017285EN.01037901.xml

| 29.8.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 285/379 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.8.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 285/379

---

P7_TA(2014)0135

EC-Costa Rica, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, Nicaragua and Panama Political Dialogue and Cooperation Agreement, with the exception of Article 49(3) thereof ***

European Parliament legislative resolution of 26 February 2014 on the draft Council decision on the conclusion on behalf of the European Union of the Political Dialogue and Cooperation Agreement between the European Community and its Members States, of the one part, and the Republics of Costa Rica, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, Nicaragua and Panama, of the other part, with the exception of Article 49(3) thereof (12399/2013 — C7-0425/2013 — 2012/0219A(NLE))

(Consent)

(2017/C 285/42)

The European Parliament,

The European Parliament

| — | having regard to the draft Council decision (12399/2013), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the draft Council decision (12399/2013),

| — | having regard to the Political Dialogue and Cooperation Agreement between the European Community and its Members States, of the one part, and the Republics of Costa Rica, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, Nicaragua and Panama, of the other part (13368/2012), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the Political Dialogue and Cooperation Agreement between the European Community and its Members States, of the one part, and the Republics of Costa Rica, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, Nicaragua and Panama, of the other part (13368/2012),

| — | having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Article 209(2) and Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (a), of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C7-0425/2013), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Article 209(2) and Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (a), of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C7-0425/2013),

| — | having regard to Rules 81 and 90(7) of its Rules of Procedure, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Rules 81 and 90(7) of its Rules of Procedure,

| — | having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on Foreign Affairs (A7-0463/2013), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on Foreign Affairs (A7-0463/2013),

| 1. | Consents to conclusion of the agreement; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Consents to conclusion of the agreement;

| 2. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States and of the Republics of Costa Rica, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, Nicaragua and Panama. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States and of the Republics of Costa Rica, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, Nicaragua and Panama.

---
#### § 141.2 Scope.

The regulations of this part apply to all non-members of the Navajo, Hopi and Zuni Tribes, who engage in retail businesses on the above respective reservations. These regulations do not apply to businesses that are wholly owned and operated by either the Navajo, Hopi or Zuni Tribes, or by individual tribal members within their respective reservations.

[45 FR 64906, Oct. 1, 1980. Redesignated at 47 FR 13327, Mar. 30, 1982]
#### Mary CATANESE and Dominic K. Catanese, Defendants-Appellants, v. Kenneth S. THOMSON, Trustee in Bankruptcy for The Naylor Machine & Mfg. Co., Plaintiff-Appellee. Mary Ann CATANESE and Dominic C. Catanese, Defendants-Appellants, v. Kenneth S. THOMSON, Trustee in Bankruptcy for The Naylor Machine & Mfg. Co., Plaintiff-Appellee. Dominic FORMICK, Defendant-Appellant, v. Kenneth S. THOMSON, Trustee in Bankruptcy for The Naylor Machine & Mfg. Co., Plaintiff-Appellee.

Nos. 12016-12018.

United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit.

Oct. 20, 1954.

Philip Sampliner, Elmer R. Vanek, Cleveland, Ohio, for appellants.

Hugh Wells, and Mooris R. Blane, Cleveland, Ohio, for appellee.

Before SIMONS, Chief Judge, and MARTIN and McALLISTER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The above cases coming on to be heard upon the record, the briefs of the parties, and the argument of counsel in open *956court, and it appearing that the findings of fact of the district court were not clearly erroneous, and that the judgments are sustained by substantial evidence, and the court being duly advised,

Now, therefore, it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the judgments of the district court be and are hereby affirmed.
EX-35.3
(logo) PACIFIC LIFE


Annual Compliance Statement


Pursuant to Section 13.9 of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of
March 1, 2012, among Morgan Stanley Capital I Inc. (the "Depositor"), Bank of
America, National Association (the "Master Servicer"), Midland Loan Services, A
Division of PNC Bank, National Association (the "Special Servicer"), Pacific
Life Insurance Company (the "Trust Advisor"), Wells Fargo Bank, National
Association (the "Trustee", "Custodian", "Certificate Administrator",
"Certificate Registrar", and "Authenticating Agent") regarding the Morgan
Stanley Capital I Inc. Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series
2012-C4 (the "Agreement"), the undersigned officers of the Trust Advisor do
hereby state:

(A) A review of the activities of the Trust Advisor for the period of March 28,
2012 through December 31,2012 and of its performance under the terms of the
Agreement has been made under our supervision.

(B) To the best of our knowledge, and based upon such review, the Trust Advisor
has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material
respects for such period.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Statement on March 8,
2013 in Newport Beach, California.


PACIFIC LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
/s/ M.A. Stickles
Title: Vice President


/s/ L. Lisa Fields
Title: Assistant Secretary


PACIFIC LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
700 Newport Center Drive, Newport Beach, California 92660-6307,
Telephone (949)219-3011
### Geohydrology of Project Gnome site, Eddy County, New Mexico

By: J.B. CooperV.M. Glanzman

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/pp712A

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plate:  **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-14-00178-CV

GEORGE PAPPAS,

Appellant

v.

CITY OF WAXAHACHIE, TEXAS, 

WAXAHACHIE FIREFIGHTERS' & 

POLICE OFFICERS' CIVIL SERVICE 

COMMISSION, GAYLE SIMMS 

& CHARLES EDGE,

Appellees

From the 40th District Court

Ellis County, Texas

Trial Court No. 88719

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant has filed a “Motion for Voluntary Dismissal.” See TEX. R. APP. P.

42.1(a)(1). He seeks dismissal of this appeal with costs to be assessed against the party 

incurring them. 
Pappas v. City of Waxahachie Page 2

Dismissal of this appeal would not prevent a party from seeking relief to which it 

would otherwise be entitled, and the certificate of conference represents that Appellees 

do not oppose this motion. The motion is granted, and the appeal is dismissed with 

each party to pay the costs in this behalf expended as they have been incurred.

REX D. DAVIS

Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and 

Justice Scoggins

Motion granted; appeal dismissed

Opinion delivered and filed November 20, 2014

[CV06]
#### § 134.1 Partial reimbursement of irrigation charges; 5 percent per annum of cost of system, June 30, 1920.

In pursuance of the act of February 14, 1920 (41 Stat. 409; 25 U.S.C. 386), regulations governing partial payment of construction charges on Indian irrigation projects, with the exception of certain ones mentioned therein, where approved by the Department June 21, 1920, and require that each owner of irrigable land under any irrigation system constructed for the benefit of Indians under provisions of law requiring reimbursement of the cost of such system and to which land, water for irrigation purposes can be delivered from such system, shall pay, on or before November 15, 1920, a sum equal to 5 percent of the per acre cost, as of June 30, 1920, of the construction of the system under which such land is situated. The per acre cost of a given system as of June 30, 1920, shall be determined by dividing the total amount expended for construction purposes on such system up to that day by the total area of land to which water for irrigation purposes can be delivered on that date; and on November 15 of each year following the year 1920, until further notice, the land owners, as therein prescribed, shall pay 5 percent of the per acre construction cost as of June 30, of the current year, such per acre cost to be determined by dividing the cost of the system to June 30 of that year by the total area of land to which water for irrigation purposes can be delivered from the system on that date. Provision is contained that no payments shall be required under the regulations in behalf of lands still in process of allotment or prior to the issuance of the first or trust patent therefor, nor for lands reserved for school, agency, or other administrative purposes where the legal title still remains in the United States.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

EUGENE R. DANIELS, 

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

H. MOORE, Lieutenant; M. BROWN,  No. 02-6624

Correctional Officer; A. SMITH,

Correctional Officer; SCOTT

JOHNSON, Grievance Clerk,

Defendants-Appellees. 

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston.

Margaret B. Seymour, District Judge.

(CA-01-583-9)

Submitted: May 30, 2002

Decided: June 19, 2002

Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Vacated and remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

COUNSEL

Eugene R. Daniels, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Thomas King, Jay Hupfer, WILLCOX, BUYCK & WILLIAMS, P.A., Florence, South Carolina, for Appellees. 
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See

Local Rule 36(c). 

OPINION

PER CURIAM: 

Eugene R. Daniels appeals from the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2001)

complaint for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. The Prison

Litigation Reform Act ("PLRA") requires that a prisoner exhaust

administrative remedies before filing a § 1983 action concerning his

confinement. 42 U.S.C.A. § 1997e(a) (West Supp. 2001). In Booth v.

Churner, 532 U.S. 731 (2001), the Supreme Court held that the PLRA

requires a prisoner to exhaust administrative remedies regarding his

excessive force claims, even if the prisoner seeks only money damages and such relief is not available under the administrative process.

Id. at 741. More recently, in Porter v. Nussle, 534 U.S. 516, 122 S.

Ct. 983 (2002), the Supreme Court held that the PLRA’s exhaustion

requirement applies to all inmate suits about prison life, whether they

involve general circumstances or particular episodes, and whether

they allege excessive force or some other wrong. 534 U.S. at ___, 122

S. Ct. at 992. 

There is evidence in the record that Daniels pursued administrative

remedies and it is not clear from the district court’s opinion whether

the district court considered this evidence. Therefore, although we

express no opinion as to whether Daniels in fact has demonstrated

exhaustion of administrative remedies, we vacate the district court’s

order dismissing the action without prejudice and remand to enable

the district court to make such a determination. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid

the decisional process. 

VACATED AND REMANDED

2 DANIELS v. MOORE
§ 162.426 May the business lease provide for non-monetary or varying types of compensation? ( a ) A lease may provide for the following, subject to the conditions in paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section: ( 1 ) Alternative forms of compensation, including but not limited to, in-kind consideration and payments based on percentage of income; or
( 2 ) Varying types of compensation at specific stages during the life of the lease, including but not limited to fixed annual payments during construction, payments based on income during an operational period, and bonuses.
( b ) For tribal land, we will defer to the tribe's determination that the compensation under paragraph (a) of this section is in its best interest, if the tribe submits a signed certification or tribal authorization stating that it has determined the compensation under paragraph (a) of this section to be in its best interest.
( c ) For individually owned land, we may approve a lease that provides for compensation under paragraph (a) of this section if we determine that it is in the best interest of the Indian landowners.
Supplementa l Recor dInde x

PAG E NOS . ANC-004 2 - ANC-004 9 ANC-005 0 - ANC-005 4 ANC-005 5 - ANC-005 6 ANC-005 7 - ANC-006 0 PAG E NOS . AGLAD-037 8 - AGLAD-038 0 PAG E NOS . CargoPort-0199 - AN C DOCUMENT S

Affidavi t o f KennethJ . Lythgo e Affidavi t o f Joh n E . Johansen , P.E . Affidavi t o f Joh n Parrott , AA E Steine r Emai l t o Reec e withpropose dDebenha mGuarante e

AN C AGLA D DOCUMENT S Emai l fromJeannett e Lucke y t o Shau n Debenha m

AN C CARGOPOR T DOCUMENT S Publi c Notic e Airport

Lan d- Proposa l t o Leas e State Property

o
-•,- \
• C D C 3

Supplementa l Recor dInde x RDM , LL C V

. AN C Pag e 1 o f 1 Docke t No . 16-09-1 4
§ 169.302 Must a right-of-way be recorded? ( a ) Any right-of-way document must be recorded in our LTRO with jurisdiction over the affected Indian land. ( 1 ) We will record the right-of-way document immediately following our approval or granting.
( 2 ) In the case of assignments that do not require our approval under § 169.207(b), the parties must provide us with a copy of the assignment and we will record the assignment in the LTRO with jurisdiction over the affected Indian land.
( b ) The tribe must record right-of-way documents for the following types of rights-of-way in the LTRO with jurisdiction over the affected Indian lands, even though BIA approval is not required: ( 1 ) Grants on tribal land for a tribal utility under § 169.4;
( 2 ) Grants on tribal land under a special act of Congress authorizing grants without our approval under certain conditions.