alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 142.4 For whom is the Alaska Resupply Operation operated? The Manager is authorized to purchase and resell food, fuel, clothing, supplies and materials, and to order, receive, stage, package, store and transport these goods and materials for: ( a ) Alaska Native Tribes, Alaska Natives, Indian or Native owned businesses, profit or nonprofit Alaska Native corporations, Native cooperatives or organizations, or such other groups or individuals as may be sponsored by any Native or Indian organization.
( b ) Other Federal agencies and the State of Alaska and its subsidiaries, as long as the ultimate beneficiaries are the Alaska Natives or their communities.
( c ) Non-Indians and Non-Natives and commercial establishments that economically or materially benefit Alaska Natives or Indians.
( d ) The Manager must make reasonable efforts to restrict competition with private enterprise.
**MIDLAND CAPITAL HOLDINGS CORPORATION**
**EXHIBIT 31.1**
**CHIEF EXECUTIVE AND FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION**
I, Paul Zogas, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Midland Capital Holdings Corporation;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:
 a)  designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterlyreport is being prepared; and  b)  evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  c)  disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscalquarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
 a)  all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls overfinancial reporting which could adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and  b)  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls.      Date: May 13, 2005 BY: /s/ Paul Zogas       Paul Zogas   President and Chief Executive Officer   and Chief Financial Officer
# C_2014036EN.01000601.xml

| 7.2.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 36/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.2.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 36/6

---

Corrigendum to Employment, Social Policy, Health and Consumer Affairs Council meeting on 9 and 10 December 2013

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 376 of 21 December 2013
  )

Official Journal of the European Union C 376 of 21 December 2013

(2014/C 36/06)

On page 3 and on the cover page, the title should read as follows:

for:

'Employment, Social Policy, Health and Consumer Affairs Council meeting on 9 and 10 December 2013',

read:

'Council conclusions on the "Reflection process on modern, responsive and sustainable health systems" '.

---
#### § 17.4 Service on interested parties.

A copy of the notice of hearing shall be served by mail, at his last known place of residence, on each presumptive heir; each beneficiary under the will offered for consideration; and each attesting witness thereto. Such notice must be mailed not less than 10 days preceding the date set for the hearing.
| 1.   | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of HealthSouth Corporation. |
|----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |   |                                                                 |
|--------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                 |   |
|   | By:    | /s/         JAY GRINNEY      |   |
|   |   | Name:   Jay Grinney                                        |   |
|   |   | Title:     President and Chief Executive Officer |   |
|   |   |                                                                 |   |
### §2143. Educational assistance: amount

(a) Subject to subsection (b), an educational assistance program established under section 2141 of this title shall provide for payment by the Secretary concerned of educational expenses incurred for instruction at an accredited institution by a person entitled to such assistance under this chapter. Expenses for which payment may be made under this section include tuition, fees, books, laboratory fees, and shop fees for consumable materials used as part of classroom or laboratory instruction. Payments under this section shall be limited to those educational expenses normally incurred by students at the institution involved.

(b)(1) The Secretary concerned shall establish the amount of educational assistance for a standard academic year (or the equivalent) to which a person becomes entitled under this chapter at the time of an enlistment described in section 2142 of this title. Depending on the needs of the service, different amounts may be established for different categories of persons or enlistments. The amount of educational assistance to which any person is entitled shall be adjusted in accordance with section 2145 of this title.

(2) The amount of educational assistance which may be provided to any person for a standard academic year (or the equivalent) may not exceed $1,200, adjusted in accordance with section 2145 of this title.

(c) In this section, the term "accredited institution" means a civilian college or university or a trade, technical, or vocational school in the United States (including the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, Guam, and the Virgin Islands) that provides education at the postsecondary level and that is accredited by a nationally recognized accrediting agency or association or by an accrediting agency or association recognized by the Secretary of Education.

(Added Pub. L. 96–342, title IX, §901(a), Sept. 8, 1980, 94 Stat. 1112; amended Pub. L. 100–180, div. A, title XII, §1231(18)(A), Dec. 4, 1987, 101 Stat. 1161.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1987—Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 100–180 inserted "the term" after "In this section,".
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-83,255-01

EX PARTE JAMES ERIC GRANT, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. FR 67168-A IN THE 264TH DISTRICT COURT

FROM BELL COUNTY

Per curiam.

O P I N I O N

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of possession of a

controlled substance and sentenced to eighteen years’ imprisonment. The Third Court of Appeals

dismissed Applicant’s direct appeal because notice of appeal was not timely filed. Grant v. State,

No. 03-14-00447-CR (Tex. App.—Austin Oct. 31, 2014) (not designated for publication). 

Applicant contends that he was denied his right to appeal through no fault of his own, and

he asks for a late appeal. Counsel filed an affidavit with the trial court. Based on that affidavit and
2

the trial court’s records, the trial court has entered findings of fact and conclusions of law and

recommends that relief be granted. Ex parte Riley, 193 S.W.3d 900 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006). The

findings and recommendation are supported by the habeas record. 

Applicant is entitled to the opportunity to file an out-of-time appeal of the judgment of

conviction in Cause 67168 from the 264th District Court of Bell County. Applicant is ordered

returned to that time at which he may give a written notice of appeal so that he may then, with the

aid of counsel, obtain a meaningful appeal. Within ten days of the issuance of this opinion, the trial

court shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be

represented by counsel, the trial court shall immediately appoint an attorney to represent Applicant

on direct appeal. All time limits shall be calculated as if the sentence had been imposed on the date

on which the mandate of this Court issues. We hold that, should Applicant desire to prosecute an

appeal, he must take affirmative steps to file a written notice of appeal in the trial court within 30

days after the mandate of this Court issues.

Copies of this opinion shall be sent to the Texas Department of Criminal Justice-Correctional

Institutions Division and Pardons and Paroles Division. 

Delivered: June 24, 2015

Do not publish
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News

U.S. and Republic of Singapore Navies Conduct Exercise Pacific Griffin 2023June 28, 2023 — The U.S. and Republic of Singapore navies are conducting combined naval training near Guam during exercise Pacific Griffin, June 16-29... MORE 

----

2024 (327)2023 (825)2022 (1193)2021 (1066)2020 (1083)2019 (1166)2018 (1116)2017 (1356)2016 (1475)2015 (1408)2014 (904)2013 (32)2012 (4)

About DoDDoD CareersJoin the MilitaryNewsUSA.govPhotos & VideosPrivacy & SecurityTop Issues

US INDOPACOM Inspector GeneralDoD Inspector General Accessibility/Section 508DoD FOIAUS INDOPACOM FOIALink DisclaimerNo FEAR ActRecovery ActINDOPACOM Webmaster

                  - Facebook
                  - X
                  - YouTube
                  - Instagram
                  - RSS

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
§ 162.010 How do I obtain a lease? ( a ) This section establishes the basic steps to obtain a lease. ( 1 ) Prospective lessees must: ( i ) Directly negotiate with Indian landowners for a lease; and
( ii ) For fractionated tracts, notify all Indian landowners and obtain the consent of the Indian landowners of the applicable percentage of interests, under § 162.012; and
( 2 ) Prospective lessees and Indian landowners must: ( i ) Prepare the required information and analyses, including information to facilitate our analysis under applicable environmental and cultural resource requirements; and
( ii ) Ensure the lease complies with the requirements in subpart C for residential leases, subpart D for business leases, or subpart E for wind energy evaluation, wind resource, or solar resource leases; and
( 3 ) Prospective lessees or Indian landowners must submit the lease, and required information and analyses, to the BIA office with jurisdiction over the lands covered by the lease, for our review and approval.
( b ) Generally, residential, business, wind energy evaluation, wind resource, and solar resource leases will not be advertised for competitive bid.
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

_____________

No. 97-1735EM

_____________

Lonnie D. Snelling, *

*

Appellant, *

*

v. *

*

State of Missouri, Indispensible Party; *

Kathianne Knaup Crane, Judge; *

Lawrence Crahan, Judge; Gerald M. *

Smith, Judge; Mary Rhodes Russell, *

Judge; King Dodge, Inc.; Lou Fusz *

Dodge Co.; Mary Elizabeth Dorsey, *

Attorney; Thomas J. Kelly, Staff *

Attorney; Stephen P. McGlynn, * Appeal from the United States

Attorney; McGlynn and McGlynn; * District Court for the Eastern

Deeba, Sauter & Herd; James R. * District of Missouri.

Reinhard, Judge, officially and *

individually; Thad F. Niemira, Judge, * [UNPUBLISHED]

officially and individually; Brendan *

Ryan, Judge; St. Louis City Board of *

Education, its members in their official *

capacity; Curtis, Oetting, Heinz, *

Garrett & Soule, P.C.; Elizabeth W. *

Lane; Lewis Rice & Fingersh P.C.; *

John R. Esnner; J. Patrick Chassaing; *

Carl Lumley; Queen Ester Stephenson; *

Green, Schaaf & Margo, P.C.; Joseph *

D. Jacobson; Housing Authority, of St. *

Louis County; John F. Kintz, Judge; *

Robert S. Cohen, Judge; Larry L. *

Kendrick, Judge; Margaret M. Nolan, *
-2-

Retired; Robert Lee Campbell, Judge; * 

Phillip J. Sweeney, Judge; Carl R. *

Gaertner, Judge; James A. Pudlowski, *

Judge; Ronnie L. White, Judge; Paul J. *

Simon, Judge; Mary K. Hoff, Judge; *

Gary Gaertner, Judge; Stanley A. *

Grimm, Judge; James R. Dowd, Judge; *

Charles P. Poplstein; Diane M. Hoelzl, *

Attorney; Thompson Coburn; Chrysler *

Motors Corporation; Nelson G. Wolff, *

Attorney; Lashly & Baer; Masonic *

Home, of Missouri; Kathy Chestnut, *

Attorney; Adrian P. Sulser, Attorney; *

Evans & Dixon; Active Business *

Liquidations; Maureen Jaggard, Clerk; *

John P. Mahoney, Vice-President; *

Eddie G. Davis, Secretary; David *

Mahan, Superintendent; Earl E. Nance, *

Jr., President, *

*

Appellees. *

_____________

 Submitted: December 18, 1997

 Filed: December 19, 1997

_____________

Before FAGG, BOWMAN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

_____________

PER CURIAM.

Lonnie D. Snelling appeals the district court's orders denying Snelling's recusal

motion and dismissing his second amended complaint under Federal Rule of Civil

Procedure 41(b). The dismissal was based on Snelling's failure to comply with the

district court's earlier order directing him to file an amended pleading in compliance
-3-

with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8(a)(2) or risk dismissal. Having carefullyreviewed

the record and the parties' briefs, we conclude the district court did not abuse its

discretion. See Pope v. Federal Express Corp., 974 F.2d 982, 985 (8th Cir. 1992)

(concerning recusal motions); Mangan v. Weinberger, 848 F.2d 909, 911 (8th Cir. 1988)

(concerning Rule 41(b) dismissals for failure to comply with Rule 8), cert. denied, 488

U.S. 1023 (1989). We thus affirm the judgment of the district court. See 8th Cir. R.

47B.

We deny as moot the motion of certain appellees to dismiss this appeal, and we

deny all other pending motions.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
#### § 17.8 Supplemental hearing.

When it appears that a supplemental hearing is necessary to secure material evidence, such a hearing may be conducted after notice has been given to those persons on whom notice of the original hearing was served and to such other persons as the testimony taken at the original hearing indicates may have a possible interest in the estate.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Army Sustainment Command Command Team Visits 403rd AFSB in South Korea

By Galen Putnam403rd AFSB Public Affairs

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More
### §2852. Military construction projects: waiver of certain restrictions

(a) The Secretary of Defense and the Secretaries of the military departments may carry out authorized military construction projects and authorized military family housing projects without regard to subsections (a) and (b) of section 3324 of title 31.

(b) Authority to carry out a military construction project or a military family housing project may be exercised on land not owned by the United States—

(1) before title to the land on which the project is to be carried out is approved under section 3111 of title 40; and

(2) even though the land will be held in other than a fee simple interest in a case in which the Secretary of the military department concerned determines that the interest to be acquired in the land is sufficient for the purposes of the project.

(c) In the case of a military construction project or a military family housing project, the contract amount thresholds specified in subchapter III of chapter 31 of title 40 (commonly referred to as the Miller Act) shall be applied by substituting "$150,000" for "$100,000" for purposes of determining when a performance bond and payment bond are required under section 3131 of such title and when alternatives to payment bonds as payment protections for suppliers of labor and materials are required under section 3132 of such title.

(Added Pub. L. 97–214, §2(a), July 12, 1982, 96 Stat. 164; amended Pub. L. 97–295, §1(35), Oct. 12, 1982, 96 Stat. 1296; Pub. L. 97–321, title VIII, §805(a)(1), Oct. 15, 1982, 96 Stat. 1573; Pub. L. 99–145, title XIII, §1303(a)(19), Nov. 8, 1985, 99 Stat. 739; Pub. L. 107–217, §3(b)(20), Aug. 21, 2002, 116 Stat. 1297; Pub. L. 112–81, div. B, title XXVIII, §2803, Dec. 31, 2011, 125 Stat. 1685.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

In 10:2852(a), the title 31 citation is substituted on authority of Pub. L. 97–258, §4(b), Sept. 13, 1982, 96 Stat. 1067, the first section of which enacted title 31.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2011—Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 112–81 added subsec. (c).

2002—Subsec. (b)(1). Pub. L. 107–217 substituted "section 3111 of title 40" for "section 355 of the Revised Statutes (40 U.S.C. 255)".

1985—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 99–145 substituted "subsections (a) and (b) of section 3324" for "section 3324(a) and (b)".

1982—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 97–295 substituted "section 3324(a) and (b) of title 31" for "section 3648 of the Revised Statutes (31 U.S.C. 529)".

Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 97–321 substituted "may be exercised on land not owned by the United States" for "on land not owned by the United States may be exercised" in introductory text, redesignated former cl. (1) as par. (1), added par. (2), and struck out former cl. (2) which read as follows: "even though the land is held temporarily".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

For effective date and applicability of section, see section 12(a) of Pub. L. 97–214, set out as a note under section 2801 of this title.
# C_2014244EN.01000101.xml

| 26.7.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 244/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.7.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 244/1

---

OPINION OF THE EUROPEAN CENTRAL BANK

of 8 July 2014

on a proposal for a Council regulation amending Regulation (EC) No 974/98 as regards the introduction of the euro in Lithuania and on a proposal for a Council regulation amending Regulation (EC) No 2866/98 as regards the conversion rate to the euro for Lithuania

(CON/2014/50)

2014/C 244/01

Introduction and legal basis

Introduction and legal basis

On 16 June 2014, the European Central Bank (ECB) received a request from the Council of the European Union for an opinion on a proposal for a Council regulation amending Regulation (EC) No 974/98 as regards the introduction of the euro in Lithuania (1). On 4 July 2014, the ECB received a request from the Council of the European Union for an opinion on a proposal for a Council regulation amending Regulation (EC) No 2866/98 as regards the conversion rate to the euro for Lithuania (2).

1

2

The ECB’s competence to deliver an opinion is based on Article 140(3) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. In accordance with the first sentence of Article 17.5 of the Rules of Procedure of the European Central Bank, the Governing Council has adopted this opinion.

Observations

Observations

| 1. | The proposed regulations will enable the introduction of the euro as the currency of Lithuania following the abrogation of Lithuania’s derogation in accordance with the procedure set out in Article 140(2) of the Treaty. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The proposed regulations will enable the introduction of the euro as the currency of Lithuania following the abrogation of Lithuania’s derogation in accordance with the procedure set out in Article 140(2) of the Treaty.

| 2. | The ECB welcomes the proposed regulations. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The ECB welcomes the proposed regulations.

Done at Frankfurt am Main, 8 July 2014.

The President of the ECB

Mario DRAGHI

---

(1)  COM(2014) 325 final.

1

(2)  COM(2014) 447 final.

2

---