alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2006165EN.01000502.xml

| 15.7.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 165/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.7.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 165/5

---

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 18 May 2006 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof) — Land Oberösterreich v ČEZ a.s.

(Case C-343/04) (1)

1

(Brussels Convention - Article 16(1)( a) - Exclusive jurisdiction in matters relating to property - Action for cessation of a nuisance caused, or likely to be caused, to land by the activities of a nuclear power station situated on the territory of a neighbouring State - Not applicable)

(2006/C 165/10)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Oberster Gerichtshof

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Land Oberösterreich

Applicant:

Defendant: ČEZ a.s.

Defendant:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Oberster Gerichtshof (Austria) — Interpretation of Article 16(1)(a) of the Brussels Convention — Exclusive jurisdiction for ‘proceedings which have as their object rights in rem in immovable property’ — Action for cassation of a nuisance caused, or likely to be caused to agricultural land by a neighbouring nuclear plant located on the territory of a non-contracting State

in rem

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

Article 16(1)(a) of the Convention of 27 September 1968 on Jurisdiction and the Enforcement of Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters, as amended most recently by the Convention of 29 November 1996 on the Accession of the Republic of Austria, the Republic of Finland and the Kingdom of Sweden, must be interpreted as meaning that an action which, like that brought under Paragraph 364(2) of the Allgemeines bürgerliches Gesetzbuch (Austrian Civil Code) in the main proceedings, seeks to prevent a nuisance affecting or likely to affect land belonging to the applicant, caused by ionising radiation emanating from a nuclear power station situated on the territory of a neighbouring State to that in which the land is situated, does not fall within the scope of that provision.

---

(1)  OJ C 251, 9.10.2004.

1

---
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 306 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                    September 28, 1999.
Whereas, earlier this year, the House of Representatives passed a Social 
        Security lockbox designed to protect the Social Security surplus by an 
        overwhelming vote of 416 to 12;
Whereas bipartisan efforts over the past few years have eliminated the budget 
        deficit and created a projected combined Social Security and non-Social 
        Security surplus of $2,896,000,000,000 over the next 10 years;
Whereas this surplus is largely due to the collection of the Social Security 
        taxes and interest on already collected receipts in the trust fund;
Whereas the President and the Congress have not reached an agreement to use any 
        of the non-Social Security surplus on providing tax relief; and
Whereas any unspent portion of the projected surplus will have the effect of 
        reducing the debt held by the public: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That it is the sense of the the House of Representatives that the 
House--
            (1) should not consider legislation that would spend any of the 
        Social Security surplus; and
            (2) should continue to pursue efforts to continue to reduce the 
        $3,618,000,000,000 in debt held by the public.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
bcr- osT~ 2z)oo - ^-^^5 

January 17, 2011 

Dennis DeVany 7 ::; 

Essential Air Service Chief US DOT Isl- - i^inS 

EAS and Domestic Analysis Div. ^;^ -d^s: 

1200 New Jersey Ave SE W86-471 . S'ji g 

Washington D.C. 20590 ^ 3g o 

<r 

Dear Mr. DeVany 

I vmte today to express my support of an Essential Air Service (EAS) subsidy for flights to 

and from Kalaupapa, Moloka'i. 

I have traveled many times from Washington State to visit friends at Kalaupapa. The 

average airfare from Spokane, Washington to Honolulu is about $485 roundtrip. In 

comparison, the average roundtrip airfare from Honolulu to Kalaupapa is $497, On a per 

nautical mile basis, Spokane to Honolulu is 16.8 cents per mile compared to $9.20 per mile 

for travel between Honolulu to Kalaupapa. That is quite the disparity. 

Many folks traveling to Kalaupapa including my father, who is 83 years old, have no other 

viable transportation mode other than flying. In addition, many Hansen's disease patients 

living at Kalaupapa have reduced mobility, which limits travel to and from the Kalaupapa 

peninsula to air travel. For this group of visitors and residents, hiking up and down the 

Kopeli trail is out of the question. 

I strongly encourage you to mclude the Kalaupapa Airport (LUP) in the EAS program. 

There are 2,000 ft cliffs on one side of the Kalaupapa Peninsula and ocean on the other 

side. There are no roads to Kalaupapa. Inclusion in the EAS program would make travel 

more affordable for both residents and visitors alike. Thank you for this consideration. 

Sincerely 

Chris Mahelona 

PO Box 179 

Valleyford, WA 99036
§ 163.63 Contract, grant, or agreement application and award process. ( a ) At such time that the budget for ANCSA corporation technical assistance projects is known, the Secretary shall advise the ANCSA corporations on which projects were selected for funding and on the deadline for submission of complete and detailed contract, grant or agreement packages.
( b ) Upon the request of an ANCSA corporation and to the extent that funds and personnel are available, the Bureau of Indian Affairs shall provide technical assistance to ANCSA corporations to assist them with: ( 1 ) Preparing the technical parts of the contract, grant, or agreement application; and
( 2 ) Obtaining technical assistance from other Federal agencies.
#### § 170.805 What maintenance activities are eligible for TTP funding?

TTP maintenance funding support a wide variety of activities necessary to maintain facilities identified in the NTTFI. A list of eligible activities is shown in the appendix to this part.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Shaun L. Cain, Appellant.

[823 NYS2d 714]

Appeal from a judgment of the Niagara County Court (Peter L. Broderick, Sr., J.), rendered July 7, 2004. The judgment convicted defendant, upon a jury verdict, of burglary in the second degree and criminal contempt in the first degree (two counts).

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him following a jury trial of one count of burglary in the second degree (Penal Law § 140.25 [2]) and two counts of criminal contempt in the first degree (§ 215.51 [b] [iv], [v]). County Court properly exercised its discretion in limiting the examination of a defense witness concerning a collateral matter designed to impeach the complainant’s credibility *(see People v Watson,*248 AD2d 737 [1998], *lv denied*92 NY2d 863 [1998]; *see generally Ingebretsen v Manha,*218 AD2d 784 [1995]). The verdict is not against the weight of the evidence *(see People v Garcia,*17 AD3d 283 [2005], *lv denied*5 NY3d 789 [2005]), and the sentence is not unduly harsh or severe. Present—Kehoe, J.P., Martoche, Centra, Green and Pine, JJ.
### §7458. Grants for faculty research for scientific, literary, and educational purposes: acceptance; authorized grantees

(a) Acceptance of Research Grants.—The Secretary of the Army may authorize the Superintendent of the Academy to accept qualifying research grants under this section. Any such grant may only be accepted if the work under the grant is to be carried out by a professor or instructor of the Academy for a scientific, literary, or educational purpose.

(b) Qualifying Grants.—A qualifying research grant under this section is a grant that is awarded on a competitive basis by an entity referred to in subsection (c) for a research project with a scientific, literary, or educational purpose.

(c) Entities From Which Grants May be Accepted.—A grant may be accepted under this section only from a corporation, fund, foundation, educational institution, or similar entity that is organized and operated primarily for scientific, literary, or educational purposes.

(d) Administration of Grant Funds.—The Secretary shall establish an account for administering funds received as research grants under this section. The Superintendent shall use the funds in the account in accordance with applicable regulations and the terms and conditions of the grants received.

(e) Related Expenses.—Subject to such limitations as may be provided in appropriations Acts, appropriations available for the Academy may be used to pay expenses incurred by the Academy in applying for, and otherwise pursuing, award of a qualifying research grant.

(f) Regulations.—The Secretary of the Army shall prescribe regulations for the administration of this section.

(Added Pub. L. 105–261, div. A, title X, §1063(a)(1), Oct. 17, 1998, 112 Stat. 2130, §4358; renumbered §7458, Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, §808(c)(1), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1839.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–232 renumbered section 4358 of this title as this section.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2018 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 115–232 effective Feb. 1, 2019, with provision for the coordination of amendments and special rule for certain redesignations, see section 800 of Pub. L. 115–232, set out as a note preceding section 3001 of this title.
### §10172. Navy Reserve Force

(a) Establishment of Command.—The Secretary of the Navy, with the advice and assistance of the Chief of Naval Operations, shall establish a Navy Reserve Force. The Navy Reserve Force shall be operated as a separate command of the Navy.

(b) Commander.—The Chief of Navy Reserve shall be the commander of the Navy Reserve Force. The commander of the Navy Reserve Force reports directly to the Chief of Naval Operations.

(c) Assignment of Forces.—The Secretary of the Navy—

(1) shall assign to the Navy Reserve Force specified portions of the Navy Reserve other than forces assigned to the unified combatant command for special operations forces established pursuant to section 167 of this title; and

(2) except as otherwise directed by the Secretary of Defense in the case of forces assigned to carry out functions of the Secretary of the Navy specified in section 8013 of this title, shall assign to the combatant commands all such forces assigned to the Navy Reserve Force under paragraph (1) in the manner specified by the Secretary of Defense.

(Added Pub. L. 104–201, div. A, title XII, §1211(a)(1), Sept. 23, 1996, 110 Stat. 2689; amended Pub. L. 109–163, div. A, title V, §515(b)(1)(BB), (3)(G), Jan. 6, 2006, 119 Stat. 3233, 3234; Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, §809(a), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1840.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2018—Subsec. (c)(2). Pub. L. 115–232 substituted "section 8013" for "section 5013".

2006—Pub. L. 109–163, §515(b)(3)(G), substituted "Navy Reserve" for "Naval Reserve" in section catchline.

Pub. L. 109–163, §515(b)(1)(BB), substituted "Navy Reserve" for "Naval Reserve" wherever appearing in text.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2018 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 115–232 effective Feb. 1, 2019, with provision for the coordination of amendments and special rule for certain redesignations, see section 800 of Pub. L. 115–232, set out as a note preceding section 3001 of this title.
# C_2013080DE.01002302.xml

| 19.3.2013 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | C 80/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.3.2013

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

C 80/23

---

Berichtigung der Schlussfolgerungen des Rates zu Investitionen in die allgemeine und berufliche Bildung — eine Antwort auf die Mitteilung „Neue Denkansätze für die Bildung: bessere sozioökonomische Ergebnisse durch Investitionen in Qualifikationen“ und den Jahreswachstumsbericht 2013

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union C 64 vom 5. März 2013
  )

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union C 64 vom 5. März 2013

2013/C 80/12

Auf Seite 7, linke Spalte, erhält der letzte Absatz folgende Fassung:

„IST SICH DARIN EINIG, DASS

die im Rat (Bildung, Jugend, Kultur und Sport) — und/oder gegebenenfalls in den einschlägigen Vorbereitungsgremien — vereinigten Vertreter der Mitgliedstaaten bei der Durchführung des Europäischen Semesters eine gewichtigere Rolle spielen und sich deshalb damit befassen sollten, welche Fortschritte die Mitgliedstaaten bei der Bewältigung der in den länderspezifischen Empfehlungen für den Bereich der allgemeinen und beruflichen Bildung genannten Herausforderungen erzielt haben, wobei die betreffenden Mitgliedstaaten allerdings zustimmen müssten (1). Überdies können die einschlägigen Ausschüsse, etwa der Beschäftigungsausschuss, im Einklang mit dem vom Vorsitz erstellten Fahrplan für das Europäische Semester gegebenenfalls vom Ausschuss für Bildungsfragen bei der Prüfung der Entwürfe der länderspezifischen Empfehlungen für den Bereich der allgemeinen und beruflichen Bildung unterstützt werden;

---

(1)  Vorbehalt von DE zur zweiten Hälfte dieses Satzes (ab ‚und sich deshalb damit befassen ...‘).“

1

---
Exhibit
      32.2




CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO




SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of QuadTech International, Inc. (the
      "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended July 31, 2006 as filed with
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Roland
      Vetter, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      QuadTech International,, Inc. and will be retained by QuadTech International,,
      Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request.




*September
      14, 2006*




*/s/
      J. Roland Vetter*





J.
      Roland
      Vetter


*Chief
      Financial*
#### § 1000.250 How are property and funding returned if there is a reassumption for substantial failure to carry out an AFA?

If there is a reassumption for substantial failure to carry out an AFA, property and funding will be returned as provided in subparts M and N of this part.
Exhibit 32.1


Certification
Pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


The undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Accounting Officer of Mid-
Wisconsin Financial Services, Inc. (the "Company") certify pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that (1) the
quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Mid-Wisconsin for the quarterly period ended
June 30, 2006 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d),
and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of Mid-
Wisconsin.

 Date: August 15, 2006

                            JAMES F. WARSAW
                            James F. Warsaw
                            President and CEO

                            RHONDA R. KELLEY
                            Rhonda R. Kelley
                            Controller
                            (Principal Accounting Officer)


      A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
      been provided to Mid-Wisconsin Financial Services, Inc. and will be
      retained by Mid-Wisconsin Financial Services, Inc. and furnished to the
      Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
§ 3.2 Public inspection of documents. ( a ) Documents filed with the Office of the Federal Register pursuant to law are available for public inspection at 800 North Capitol Street, NW., suite 700, Washington, DC, during the Office of the Federal Register office hours. There are no formal inspection procedures or requirements.
( b ) The Director of the Federal Register shall cause each document received by the office to be filed for public inspection not later than the working day preceding the publication day for that document.
( c ) The Director shall cause to be placed on the original and certified copies of each document a notation of the day and hour when it was filed and made available for public inspection.
( d ) Photocopies of documents or excerpts may be made at the inspection desk.
[37 FR 23604, Nov. 4, 1972, as amended at 54 FR 9676, Mar. 7, 1989; 57 FR 40025, Sept. 1, 1992]
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 34 (Friday, February 18, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 9577-9578]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-3710]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention


Board of Scientific Counselors, National Institute for 
Occupational Safety and Health: Notice of Charter Renewal

    This gives notice under the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 
92-463) of October 6, 1972, that the Board of Scientific Counselors, 
National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Centers for 
Disease Control and Prevention, Department of Health and Human 
Services, has been renewed for a 2-year period through February 3, 
2013.
    For information, contact Dr. Roger Rosa, Executive Secretary, Board 
of Scientific Counselors, National Institute for Occupational Safety 
and Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Department of 
Health and Human Services, CDC/Washington Office, HHH Building, 200 
Independence Ave, SW., Room 715H, MS P12, Washington, DC 20201--
telephone 202/205-7856 or fax 202/260-4464.
    The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, has been 
delegated the authority to sign Federal Register notices pertaining to 
announcements of meetings and other committee management activities for 
both the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Agency for 
Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.


[[Page 9578]]


    Dated: February 14, 2011.
Elaine L. Baker,
Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for Disease 
Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2011-3710 Filed 2-17-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
# C_2013015EN.01001001.xml

| 18.1.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 15/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.1.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 15/10

---

Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries

2013/C 15/05

In accordance with Article 35(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), a decision has been taken to close the fishery as set down in the following table:

1

| Date and time of closure | 12.12.2012 |
| --- | --- |
| Duration | 12.12.2012-31.12.2012 |
| Member State | Spain |
| Stock or group of stocks | GFB/567- |
| Species | Forkbeards (Phycis spp.) |
| Zone | EU and international waters of V, VI and VII |
| Type(s) of fishing vessels | — |
| Reference number | FS83DSS |

Date and time of closure

12.12.2012

Duration

12.12.2012-31.12.2012

Member State

Spain

Stock or group of stocks

GFB/567-

Species

Forkbeards (Phycis spp.)

Phycis

Zone

EU and international waters of V, VI and VII

Type(s) of fishing vessels

—

Reference number

FS83DSS

---

(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.

1

---
#### High Falls Pulp Company, Appellant, v. William Johnston, Sr., and William Johnston, Jr., Doing Business as Chateaugay Pulp Company, Respondents.

Judgment and order unanimously affirmed,-with costs. No opinion.
®s

s® s® s® s® s®

s® s®

s® s® s® ®s

!(V

122 3±

321 3± 150 3±

187 3±

456 3±

457 3±

279 3±

186 3±

316 3±

150 3±

314 3±

508 3±

278 3± 305 3±

188 3±

455 3±

307 3± 308 3±

321 3±

188 3±

3±

322 3±

628

279 3±

587 3±

841 3±

313 3±

504 3±

478 3±

479 3±

142 3± 262 3±

261 3±

455B 3±

455 3±

504A 3±

479A 3±

142B 3±

110 3±

141 3±

120 3±

317 3±

122 3±

455A 3±

UV321

UV308

Mount

Jewett

UV6

UV219

UV315

UV3006

UV219

UV59

UV573

UV325

UV4001

UV59

Westline

638 3±

Mead Run ALLEGHENY RESERVOIR

Root Run

Markham Run

Wi nd fal l Run

Thundershower Run

Turnup

Run

Camp Run

Wintergreen Run

Pine Run

Kinz ua Creek

Meade Run

Windfall Run

Blacksnake Run

Town Li ne Run

Buc kli ck Run

Red Bridge

Recreation

Area

1

4

34

41

40

35

36

43

20

19

15

14

13 4

2

38

22

32

33 36

22

48

40

27

36 48

30

34

10 17

49

42

43

41

36

30

17

472

7 13

28

44

22

31

51 50

47

12 22

23

29

15

16

25

59

23

2

15

14

16 13

9

7

46

42 25

10

59

40 29 22 30 51 52

58 15

457

458

476

478 479

460

459

461

462

463

464

465

473

474

475

485 484

482

483

480

481

809

806 805

804

803

477

38

37

277 3±

Kinz ua Creek

Kinzua Creek

14

19

28

9

27

29

22

33

12

18

6 7

44

42

24

5

4

33

62

54

54

53

8

29

66 55

13

16

5 6 20

21

23

43

22

34

37

46

37

4

17

11

19

Duck

Ponds

UV59

UV321 UV770

S.Br.Kinzua C r.

808

BR ADFORD RA NGER DISTRICT

MARIE NVILLE R ANGER DISTRICT

18

MXD: c:\gis\Project\BRAD_Project\EAUpperKinzua\GIS\MXD\OtherActivity.mxdMap Product: c:\gis\Project\BRAD_Project\EAUpperKinzua\GIS\MapProduct\OtherActivity010711.pdf

Wildlife Habitat Improvement

s® s® s® Disabled Hunter Road

!(V Vista

!9 Stabilize Dispersed Camping Site

Pond Improvements

Æü Parking for Stream Access

In-Stream Log Structures

In-Stream-Large Wood Additions

Riparian Stand Improvement

Compartment Boundary

Project Boundary

Roads

System Name

State or Municipal Road

Forest Road

Other Road

Forest Proclamation Boundary

Ranger District Boundary

Utilities

Waterbody

! ! ! ! ! !

Stream

Ownership

Forest Service

Private Ownership

MAP 4

OTHER PROPOSED ACTIONS

UPPER KINZUA

Bradford Ranger District

Allegheny National Forest

1

The Forest Service uses the most current and complete data available. GIS data and

product accuracy may vary. They may be: developed from sources of differing

accuracy, accurate only at certain scales, based on modeling or interpretation, incomplete

while being created or revised, etc. Using GIS products for purposes other than those

for which they were created, may yield inaccurate or misleading results. The Forest

Service reserves the right to correct, update, modify, or replace GIS products without

notification. The Forest Service will not be liable for any activity involving this information

0

1

1

:6

-0

0

7

,0

-2

0

0

0

11, slk 1

0 1 2

Miles