alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV

House Calendar No. 157

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 374

[Report No. 106–465]

Providing for consideration of motions to suspend the rules.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

NOVEMBER 10, 1999

Mr. DREIER, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution;

which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

RESOLUTION

Providing for consideration of motions to suspend the rules.

1 Resolved, That it shall be in order at any time on

2 or before the legislative day of Wednesday, November 17,

3 1999, for the Speaker to entertain motions to suspend the

4 rules, provided that the object of any such motion is an5 nounced from the floor at least one hour before the motion

6 is offered. In scheduling the consideration of legislation

7 under this authority, the Speaker or his designee shall

8 consult with the Minority Leader or his designee.
2

HRES 374 RH

1 SEC. 2. Provides that House Resolution 342 is laid

2 on the table.

House Calendar No. 157

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 374

[Report No. 106–465]

RESOLUTION

Providing for consideration of motions to suspend

the rules.

NOVEMBER 10, 1999

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be

printed
#### § 2.507 How do I appeal a reviewing official's decision?

(a) To appeal a reviewing official's decision that is not a final agency action, you must file your appeal in accordance with the instructions for appeal contained in the decision.

(b) The decision will include instructions that briefly describe how to appeal the decision, to whom the appeal should be directed, and the deadline for filing an appeal, and will refer interested parties to the regulations governing the appeal.

(c) If you are appealing to the IBIA, you must comply with IBIA's regulations, set out at 43 CFR part 4.

(d) Except where a specific section of this part sets out a different appellate hierarchy, table 1 to this paragraph (d) indicates the official to whom subsequent appeals should be addressed.

Table 1 to Paragraph (d)

| Reviewing official (or IBIA) whose decision is being appealed | Official to whom the appeal is addressed |
| --- | --- |
| Regional Director | IBIA. |
| Principal of a Bureau operated school | Education Program Administrator. |
| Education Program Administrator | Associate Deputy Director, Bureau of Indian Education. |
| Associate Deputy Director, BIE | Director, BIE. |
| President of a Bureau operated post-secondary school | Director, BIE. |
| Deputy Director BIA, Office of Justice Services (OJS) | IBIA. |
| Director, BIE | AS-IA. |
| Director, BTFA | AS-IA. |
| Director, BIA | IBIA. |
| Deputy Assistant Secretary—Indian Affairs | AS-IA. |
| AS-IA | (Decision is final for the Department). |
| IBIA | (Decision is final for the Department). |
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, DC In the Matter of: WORLD LOGISTICS SOLUTIONS, LLC Respondent ) ) ) ) ) DocketNo. FAA-2015-0207 Case No. 2014-GL-70-0263 Judge J.E. Sullivan

NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT AND WITHDRAWAL OF REQUEST FORHEARING On January 29, 2016, Respondent and Complainant settled the above referenced matter and therefore, Respondent hereby withdraws its Request for Hearing. Respectfully submitted,

# D~~&~ Vedder Price P.C. 1401 I Street NW, Suite 1100 Washington, DC 20005 T: 202-312 3340 F: 202-312 3322 dhemandez@vedderprice.com Counsel 

### for World Logistics, LLC d/b/a Viabox

WASHINGTON_DC/#49722.1CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that I have, this date, served the foregoing NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT AND WITHDRAWAL OF REQUEST the following address as indicated:

One Copy: Mr. Brian K. Khan, Esq. Enforcement Division, Midwest Team FAA Office ofthe ChiefCounsel 2300 East Devon Avenue Des Plaines, Illinois 60018 Fax: 847-294-7498 One Copy: Judge J.E. Sullivan U.S. Administrative LawJudge Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200NewJersey Avenue, S.E. (E-11-310) Washington, D.C. 20590 Fax: 202-366-7536 via Fax

via Fax

Original and One C::ggy: via US. Mail Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, D.C. 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building- Suite 2W1 000

Dated this 5th day ofFcbntary, 2016

### ~~**Me-ganlj\;io~riso~, Administrativ~-A~~i~t~nt**  Vedder Price P.C.
### §2349. Overseas Workload Program

(a) In General.—A firm of any member nation of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization or of any major non-NATO ally shall be eligible to bid on any contract for the maintenance, repair, or overhaul of equipment of the Department of Defense located outside the United States to be awarded under competitive procedures as part of the program of the Department of Defense known as the Overseas Workload Program.

(b) Site of Performance.—A contract awarded to a firm described in subsection (a) may be performed in the theater in which the equipment is normally located or in the country in which the firm is located.

(c) Exceptions.—The Secretary of a military department may restrict the geographic region in which a contract referred to in subsection (a) may be performed if the Secretary determines that performance of the contract outside that specific region—

(1) could adversely affect the military preparedness of the armed forces; or

(2) would violate the terms of an international agreement to which the United States is a party.

(d) Definition.—In this section, the term "major non-NATO ally" has the meaning given that term in section 2350a(i)(2) of this title.

(Added Pub. L. 103–160, div. A, title XIV, §1431(a)(1), Nov. 30, 1993, 107 Stat. 1832; amended Pub. L. 108–375, div. A, title X, §1084(d)(18), Oct. 28, 2004, 118 Stat. 2062.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 2349, added Pub. L. 96–323, §2(a), Aug. 4, 1980, 94 Stat. 1018, §2330; renumbered §2349, Pub. L. 99–145, title XIII, §1304(a)(3), Nov. 8, 1985, 99 Stat. 741; Pub. L. 101–189, div. A, title IX, §931(e)(1), Nov. 29, 1989, 103 Stat. 1535, directed Secretary of Defense to submit a report to Congress annually relating to agreements under this chapter, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 101–510, §1301(11).

Provisions similar to those in this section were contained in Pub. L. 101–510, div. A, title XIV, §1465, Nov. 5, 1990, 104 Stat. 1700, as amended, which was set out as a note under section 2341 of this title, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 103–160, §1431(b)(1). Other prior similar provisions, formerly set out under section 2341 of this title, were contained in the following authorization or appropriation acts:

Pub. L. 102–396, title IX, §9130, Oct. 6, 1992, 106 Stat. 1935, as amended by Pub. L. 103–160, div. A, title XIV, §1431(b)(2), Nov. 30, 1993, 107 Stat. 1833.

Pub. L. 102–172, title VIII, §8122, Nov. 26, 1991, 105 Stat. 1205.

Pub. L. 101–511, title VIII, §8003, Nov. 5, 1990, 104 Stat. 1873.

Pub. L. 100–180, div. A, title X, §1021, Dec. 4, 1987, 101 Stat. 1143.

#### Amendments

2004—Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 108–375 substituted "section 2350a(i)(2)" for "section 2350a(i)(3)".
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Rotational Units Join 2 Infantry Division, Ensure Continued Fight Tonight Readiness 

By   1st Infantry Division  Public Affairs Office 

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More News/Articles
2 No. 62079

MICHAEL STEVE COX, Petitioner, vs. THE SEVENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF WHITE PINE, Respondent. MICHAEL STEVE COX, Petitioner, vs. THE SEVENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF WHITE PINE, Resnondent. No. 62080

ORDER DENYING WRIT PETITIONS These are seven original proper person petitions for extraordinary relief. The petitions are not consolidated.

Having considered these petitions and supporting documents, we conclude that petitioner's arguments lack merit and that our intervention by way of extraordinary relief is not warranted. Accordingly, we deny the petitions. NRAP 21(b)(1); NRAP 21(c).

Additionally, as demonstrated by the this order, petitioner has filed numerous meritless proper person petitions in this court seeking extraordinary writ relief and has further filed a number of similarly meritless appeals in this court. See Cox v. McDaniel, Docket No. 60056, Cox v. McDaniel, Docket No. 60151, Cox v. Bannister, Docket No. 60637, Cox v. State, Docket No. 61322. We caution appellant that continued filing of such meritless petitions and appeals may result in restrictions on his ability to file papers in this court in forma pauperis. See Jordan v. State, Dept. of Motor Vehicles & Pub. Safety, 121 Nev. 44, 110 P.3d 30 (2005),

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA
(0) 1947A KlEEZZISUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA
(0) 1947A SINEEMEZMMEEMEIN 3

- 11EMESEM-11UMMEMEMEEtiaidiEM abrogated on other grounds by Buzz Stew, LLC v. City of N. Las Vegas, 124 Nev. 224, 181 P.3d 670 (2008).

It is so ORDERED. 1

Hardesty

Parraguirre

cc: Hon. James Todd Russell, District Judge Michael Steve Cox Attorney General/Carson City Carson City Clerk White Pine County Clerk Eighth District Court Clerk

'In each of these writ petitions, this court has received petitioner's requests for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We direct the clerk of this court to file the May 17, 2011, and the June 28, 2011, motions in Docket No. 58292; the March 19, 2012, motion in Docket No. 60404; the March 19, 2012, motion in Docket No. 60406; the March 19, 2012, motion in Docket No. 60407; the March 19, 2012, motion in Docket No. 60409; the November 20, 2012, motion in Docket No. 62079; and the November 20, 2012, motion in Docket No. 62080. Because petitioner was granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis in each of these writ petitions, no action is required on these motions.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News

Pacific leaders commemorate Anzac Day in Honolulu April 25, 2024 — HONOLULU — Multinational military and civilian leaders from across the Indo-Pacific region gathered to commemorate Australia and New Zealand Army Corps Day at the National Memorial Cemetery of the... MORE 

----

2024 (327)2023 (825)2022 (1193)2021 (1066)2020 (1083)2019 (1166)2018 (1116)2017 (1356)2016 (1475)2015 (1408)2014 (904)2013 (32)2012 (4)

About DoDDoD CareersJoin the MilitaryNewsUSA.govPhotos & VideosPrivacy & SecurityTop Issues

US INDOPACOM Inspector GeneralDoD Inspector General Accessibility/Section 508DoD FOIAUS INDOPACOM FOIALink DisclaimerNo FEAR ActRecovery ActINDOPACOM Webmaster

                  - Facebook
                  - X
                  - YouTube
                  - Instagram
                  - RSS

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C.  SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of General Metals Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended July 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Daniel Forbush, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1)

the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)

the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Dated: December 10, 2009.



|                                                                                                        
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Daniel J. Forbush                                                                                   
|Daniel J. Forbush
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer and
Principal Accounting Officer)
|
#### Jamison *v.*Fruits.

[No. 11,926.

Filed December 2, 1924.]

From Starke Circuit Court; *William C. Pentecost,*Judge.

Action between William R. Jamison and Bert Fruits. From the judgment rendered, the former appeals.

*Affirmed.*

*William J. Reed,*for appellant.

*Harry C. Miller*and *F. M. Trissal,*for appellee.

Per Curiam.

Affirmed.
**Exhibit 18.1**

July 10, 2012 

The Board of Directors 

6922767 Holding S.à.r. l. (‘the Company’) 

13-15 Avenue de la Liberté 

L-1931Luxembourg 

Dear Sirs: 

Note 2 ofthe notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements of 6922767 Holding S.à.r.l. included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for CHC Helicopter S.A. for the year ended April 30, 2012 describes a change in the date of the Company’sannual goodwill and indefinite lived intangible asset impairment tests from the last day of the fourth quarter to the first day of the fourth quarter. There are no authoritative criteria for determining which date is preferable based on theparticular circumstances; however, we conclude that the change in the impairment testing date is to an acceptable alternative which, based on your business judgment to make this change this change and for the stated reasons, is preferable in yourcircumstances. 

Very truly yours, 

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP 

CharteredAccountants 

Vancouver, Canada
### SUBCHAPTER I—GENERAL

Sec.
4901.
Department of Defense small business strategy.
4902.
Department of Defense Mentor–Protege Program.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**2022**—Pub. L. 117–263, div. A, title VIII, §856(c), Dec. 23, 2022, 136 Stat. 2726, added item 4902.
United States 

EPA Environmental Protection Agency

Washington, DC 20460 

FEDERAL REGISTER TYPESETTING REQUEST 

Requestor: Complete items 1, 2, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, and 13. Retain copy number 7 and submit the balance with manuscript copy to the Hq. Federal Register Office. 

HQ Federal Register Office: Complete Items 3, 4, 5, and 6. Retain copy number 5 and submit balance to Hq. Printing Management. 

1. TITLE 

2. SUBMITTING ACTIVITY 3. ASSIGNED FRL NUMBER (include alpha & numeric characters for identification)

4. OPEN REQUISITION NUMBER 5. BILLING CODE 

6. FORWARDED TO GSA, NARS - SIGNATURE DATE 

7. NUMBER OF MANUSCRIPT PAGES 8. ESTIMATED NUMBER OF COLUMNS 9. ESTIMATED COST 

10. SIGNATURE: (a) REQUESTING OFFICER 11. SIGNATURE: (a) FEDERAL REGISTER DESIGNEE 

(b) DATE (c) TELEPHONE NUMBER (b) DATE (c) TELEPHONE NUMBER 

12. FUNDS ARE AVAILABLE 

NAME OF FUNDS CERTIFYING OFFICER SIGNATURE OF FUNDS CERTIFYING OFFICER PHONE NUMBER OF FUNDS CERTIFYING OFFICER 

13. Financial and Accounting Data 

Line 

DCN

(Max 6)

Budget/FYs

(Max 4)

Appropriation Code

(Max 6)

Budget Org/Code 

(Max 7)

Program Results Code 

(Max 9)

Object Class 

(Max 4)

SFO 

(Max 2)

1 

2 

3 

Amount (Dollars) (Cents)

Site/Project

(Max 8)

Cost Org/Code

(Max 7)

1 

2 

3 

EPA Form 2340-15 (Rev. 8- 94) Electronic and paper versions acceptable. (WebForms v1.0) 

Previous editions are obsolete. COPY 1 – PRINTING MANAGEMENT OFFICER
#### § 170.121 Where is information about designing and operating a toll facility available?

Information on designing and operating a toll highway, bridge or tunnel is available from the International Bridge, Tunnel and Turnpike Association. The Association publishes a variety of reports, statistics, and analyses. The Web site is located at *http://www.ibtta.org.* Information is also available from FHWA.
H. R. 92

One Hundred Sixth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE FIRST SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,

the sixth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-nine

An Act

To designate the Federal building and United States courthouse located at 251

North Main Street in Winston-Salem, North Carolina, as the ‘‘Hiram H. Ward

Federal Building and United States Courthouse’’.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

The Federal building and United States courthouse located

at 251 North Main Street in Winston-Salem, North Carolina, shall

be known and designated as the ‘‘Hiram H. Ward Federal Building

and United States Courthouse’’.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper,

or other record of the United States to the Federal building referred

to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Hiram

H. Ward Federal Building and United States Courthouse’’.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
§ 601.25 Record of Decision. ( a ) If NCPC is the Lead Agency and decides to recommend approval of a proposed action covered by an EIS, it shall prepare and sign a ROD stating the Commission's decision and any Mitigation measures required by the Commission. ( 1 ) The ROD shall include among others: ( i ) A statement of the decision.
( ii ) The identification of alternatives considered in reaching a decision specifying the alternatives that were considered to be environmentally preferable. The ROD shall discuss preferences among alternatives based on relevant factors including economic and technical planning considerations and the Commission's statutory mission. The ROD shall identify those factors balanced to reach a decision and the influence of various factors on the decision.
( iii ) A statement as to whether all practicable means to avoid or minimize environmental harm from the alternative selected has been adopted, and if not, why they are not.
( iv ) A monitoring and enforcement program that summarizes Mitigation measures.
( v ) Date of issuance.
( vi ) Signature of the Chairman.
( 2 ) The contents of the draft ROD proposed for Commission adoption shall be summarized in the EDR and a full version of the draft document shall be included as an Appendix to the EDR. The Draft ROD, independently of the EDR, shall be made available to the public for review fourteen (14) calendar days prior to the Commission's consideration of the proposed action for which the EIS was prepared.
( 3 ) The Commission shall arrive at its decision about the proposed action for which NCPC serves as the Lead Agency and its environmental effects in a public meeting of record as identified by the Commission's monthly agenda.
( b ) If NCPC is not the Lead Agency, following the Commission final approval of a project to which a ROD pertains, and consistent with the Federal Agency's NEPA regulations, NCPC may take one of the following actions. It may either co-sign the Lead Agency's ROD following Commission approval of the project if NCPC agrees with its contents and conclusions or it shall prepare, sign, and sign and adopt its own ROD in accordance with the requirements of paragraphs (a)(1) through (3) of this section.
( c ) If the Commission determines a Lead Agency's EIS fails to support a ROD, the Lead Agency shall revise its EIS, or, alternatively, the Commission shall not approve or give any further consideration to underlying application.
§ 20.206 Must a tribe get approval for a tribal redesign plan? If you have a Public Law 93-638 contract or receive direct services from us, you must obtain our approval before implementing a redesign plan. You can apply for approval to the Regional Director through the Bureau servicing office. ( a ) You must submit your redesign plan for approval at least 3 months before the effective date.
( b ) If you operate with a self-governance annual funding agreement, you must obtain the approval of the redesign from the Office of Self-Governance.
( c ) If you operate with a Public Law 102-477 grant, you must obtain approval from the Bureau Central Office.
[65 FR 63159, Oct. 20, 2000; 65 FR 76563, Dec. 7, 2000]