alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### Investigations of ferruginous bauxite and other mineral resources on Kauai and a reconnaissance of ferruginous bauxite deposits on Maui, Hawaii

By: Sam H. Patterson

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/pp656

#### Links

- More information:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**                            (html)
-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 3**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 4**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 5**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 6**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 7**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 8**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 9**                            (pdf) 
- Superseded Publications:
                                        Bauxite deposits of Hawaiian Islands - a preliminary report(1958)                                    

                                        Progress report on the investigations of bauxite deposits in the eastern part of Kauai, Hawaii(1959)                                    

                                        Investigations of ferruginous bauxite and plastic clay deposits on Kauai and a reconnaissance of ferruginous bauxite deposits on Maui, Hawaii(1962)                                    

- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
### §2128. Accession bonus for members of the program

(a) Availability of Bonus.—The Secretary of Defense may offer a person who enters into an agreement under section 2122(a)(2) of this title an accession bonus of not more than $20,000 as part of the agreement.

(b) Relation to Other Payments.—An accession bonus paid a person under this section is in addition to any other amounts payable to the person under this subchapter.

(c) Repayment.—A person who receives an accession bonus under this section, but fails to comply with the agreement under section 2122(a)(2) of this title or to commence or complete the active duty obligation imposed by section 2123 of this title, shall be subject to the repayment provisions of section 303a(e) or 373 of title 37.

(Added Pub. L. 110–181, div. A, title VI, §623(a), Jan. 28, 2008, 122 Stat. 152; amended Pub. L. 115–91, div. A, title VI, §618(a)(1)(F), Dec. 12, 2017, 131 Stat. 1426.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

Prior sections 2128 to 2130 were renumbered sections 16201 to 16203 of this title, respectively.

#### Amendments

2017—Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 115–91 inserted "or 373" before "of title 37".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Pub. L. 110–181, div. A, title VI, §623(c), Jan. 28, 2008, 122 Stat. 152, provided that: "The amendment made by subsection (a) [enacting this section] shall apply with respect to agreements entered into under section 2122(a)(2) of title 10, United States Code, on or after the date of the enactment of this Act [Jan. 28, 2008]."
### §2035. Flexibility in authorities for management of programs and units

(a) Authority To Convert Otherwise Closing Units to National Defense Cadet Corps Program Units.—If the Secretary of a military department is notified by a local educational agency of the intent of the agency to close its Junior Reserve Officers' Training Corps, the Secretary shall offer the agency the option of converting the unit to a National Defense Cadet Corps (NDCC) program unit in lieu of closing the unit.

(b) Flexibility in Administration of Instructors.—

(1) In general.—The Secretaries of the military departments may, without regard to any other provision of this chapter, undertake initiatives designed to promote flexibility in the hiring and compensation of instructors for the Junior Reserve Officers' Training Corps program under the jurisdiction of such Secretaries.

(2) Elements.—The initiatives undertaken pursuant to this subsection may provide for one or more of the following:

(A) Termination of the requirement for a waiver as a condition of the hiring of well-qualified non-commissioned officers with a bachelor's degree for senior instructor positions within the Junior Reserve Officers' Training Corps.

(B) Specification of a single instructor as the minimum number of instructors required to found and operate a Junior Reserve Officers' Training Corps unit.

(C) Authority for Junior Reserve Officers' Training Corps instructors to undertake school duties, in addition to Junior Reserve Officers' Training Corps duties, at small schools.

(D) Authority for the payment of instructor compensation for a limited number of Junior Reserve Officers' Training Corps instructors on a 10-month per year basis rather than a 12-month per year basis.

(E) Such other actions as the Secretaries of the military departments consider appropriate.

(c) Flexibility in Allocation and Use of Travel Funding.—The Secretaries of the military departments shall take appropriate actions to provide so-called regional directors of the Junior Reserve Officers' Training Corps programs located at remote rural schools enhanced discretion in the allocation and use of funds for travel in connection with Junior Reserve Officers' Training Corps activities.

(d) Standardization of Program Data.—The Secretary of Defense shall take appropriate actions to standardize the data collected and maintained on the Junior Reserve Officers' Training Corps programs in order to facilitate and enhance the collection and analysis of such data. Such actions shall include a requirement for the use of the National Center for Education Statistics (NCES) identification code for each school with a unit under a Junior Reserve Officers' Training Corps program in order to facilitate identification of such schools and their units under the Junior Reserve Officers' Training Corps programs.

(Added Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title V, §557(a)(1), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1773.)
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 14

- 60725 Summary Calendar

MARICELA ESCALANTE

- ALVAREZ , Petitioner

v. LORETTA LYNCH, U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL , Respondent

Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals BIA No. A078 974 638

Before JOLLY, BENAVIDES, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Maricela Escalante

- Alvarez, a native and citizen of Honduras, petitions this court for review of the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) dismissing her appeal from the denial of her motion to reopen her in absentia removal proceedings. We review the denial of such motions under a highly deferential abuse

- of

- discretion standard and will uphold the decision of the BIA unless it is capricious, without foundation in the evidence, or otherwise so

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED June 10, 2016 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 14-60725 Document: 00513543183 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/10/2016N o. 14

- 60725

2 irrational that it is arbitrary rather than the result of any perceptible rational approach. See P anjwani v. Gonzales, 401 F.3d 626, 632 (5th Cir. 2005); Z hao v. Gonzales, 404 F .3d 295, 304 (5th Cir. 2005). Motions to reopen are disfavored, and we have held that the moving party “ bears a heavy burden.” Altamirano

- Lopez v. Gonzales, 435 F.3d 547, 549 (5th Cir. 2006) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). Escalante

- Alvarez asserts that the BIA abused its discretion in refusing to reopen the removal proceedings on account of changed country conditions in Honduras

. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(3)(ii) . She argues that she presented evidence showing that violence against women in Honduras, particularly murder, has increased dramatically. However, t he evidence presented reflects that violence against women has been, and remains, an ongoing problem in Honduras. In addition , Escalante

- Alvarez failed to compare in any meaningful

way the conditions in Honduras at the time of her 2002 removal hearing and her 2013 motion to reopen. Thus, we conclude that the BIA did not abuse its discretion because its decision was not capricious, without foundation in the evidence, or otherwise so irra tional that it is arbitrary. See Zhao, 404 F.3d at
304

. Finally, Escalante

- Alvarez argues that the BIA erred by failing to consider her eligibility for asylum, withholding of removal, and CAT relief ; however, t he BIA was not required to consider these ot her issues in light of its conclusion on her motion to reopen. Accordingly, the petition for review is DENIED. Case: 14-60725 Document: 00513543183 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/10/2016
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Juan Rosario, Appellant.

[824 NYS2d 296]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Richard D. Carruthers, J.), rendered May 14, 2004, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of course of conduct against a child in the first degree, reckless endangerment in the first degree and endangering the welfare of a child, and sentencing him to an aggregate term of 20 years, unanimously affirmed.

The court properly exercised its discretion in receiving evidence relating to defendant’s pattern of escalating sexual conduct toward the child victim prior to the charged crimes. This evidence had little prejudicial effect, and it constituted highly probative background information that tended to explain the relationship between defendant and the victim and place the events in question in a believable context, particularly since defendant made a major issue of the victim’s delay in reporting the charged criminal conduct *(see e.g. People v Gilley,*4 AD3d 127 [2004], *lv denied*2 NY3d 799 [2004]; *People v Feliciano,*301 AD2d 480 [2003], *lv denied*100 NY2d 538 [2003]; *People v Steinberg,*170 AD2d 50, 72-74 [1991], *affd*79 NY2d 673 [1992]). The charged conduct did not, itself, sufficiently explain the victim’s behavior, and, in any event, the People “were not bound to stop after presenting minimum evidence” *(People v Alvino,*71 NY2d 233, 245 [1987]). Moreover, we note that much of the conduct claimed by defendant to be uncharged crimes actually fell within the time frame of the count charging endangering the welfare of a child.

*371The court properly exercised its discretion in allowing a qualified nurse practitioner, who has examined a large number of child victims of sex abuse, to give expert testimony on various matters that went beyond her own examination of the victim. It was error to have allowed her to testify that the absence of physical evidence of trauma was consistent with the claim of sex abuse. However, in light of the overwhelming evidence of defendant’s guilt, such error was harmless.

With regard to both the uncharged crimes evidence and expert testimony, defendant did not preserve his claim that the court provided inadequate jury instructions, or any constitutional arguments, and we decline to review them in the interest of justice. Were we to review these claims, we would find them to be without merit. Concur—Mazzarelli, J.E, Friedman, Nardelli, Gonzalez and Catterson, JJ.
#### § 152.29 Rejection of bids; disapproval of sale.

The Secretary reserves the right to reject any and all bids before the award, after the award, or at any time prior to the issuance of a patent or delivery of a deed, when he shall have determined such rejection to be in the best interests of the Indian owner.
|    |                                                                                                                                        |
|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Diamondback Energy, Inc. (the “registrant”); and |

|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report. |

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |  |  |
|   |   |   |   |
| Date:  | March 12, 2019 |   | /s/ Travis D. Stice |
|   |   |   | Travis D. Stice |
|   |   |   | Chief Executive Officer |
(logo) BERKADIA ®

 

 

Annual Statement asto Compliance

For the Year EndedDecember 31, 2019 

** **

*Morgan StanleyCapital I Trust, Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates*

*Series 2012-C4*

 

 

Pursuant to Section 13.9 of theSubservicing Agreement governing the referenced transaction (the “ServicingAgreement”), I hereby attest that:

 

i. A review of theactivities and performance of Berkadia as Subservicer during the period hasbeen made under my supervision.

 

ii. To the best ofmy knowledge, based on such review, Berkadia as Subservicer has fulfilled, inall material respects, its obligations under this Subservicing Agreementthroughout the period and no default by the Subservicer under the SubservicingAgreement has occurred and is continuing. 

 

Berkadia,

 

 

/s/ Mark E McCool

Mark E. McCool

President

February 10, 2020
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Cosine Communications, Inc. (the Company) on Form
10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Terry Gibson, Director, Chief Executive Officer
and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my
knowledge:  (1)
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. /s/ Terry Gibson

Terry Gibson
Director, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
May 13, 2005
### §239b. Certain intelligence-related programs: budget justification materials

(a) Prohibition on Use of Program Elements.—In the budget justification materials submitted to Congress in support of the Department of Defense budget for fiscal year 2021 and each fiscal year thereafter (as submitted with the budget of the President under section 1105(a) of title 31), the Secretary of Defense may not include in any single program element both funds made available under the Military Intelligence Program and funds made available outside of the Military Intelligence Program.

(b) Definitions.—In this section:

(1) The term "budget" has the meaning given that term in section 231(f) of this title.

(2) The term "defense budget materials" has the meaning given that term in section 231(f) of this title.

(Added Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title XVI, §1624(b)(1), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 2120.)
### §8027. Chief of Legislative Affairs

(a) There is a Chief of Legislative Affairs in the Department of the Navy.

(b) The Chief of Legislative Affairs shall perform legislative affairs functions as specified for the Office of the Secretary of the Navy by section 8014(c)(1)(F) of this title.

(Added Pub. L. 107–314, div. A, title V, §504(d)(1)(A), Dec. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 2532, §5027; amended Pub. L. 114–328, div. A, title V, §502(v), Dec. 23, 2016, 130 Stat. 2104; renumbered §8027 and amended Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, §§807(a)(1), 809(a), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1834, 1840.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–232, §807(a)(1), renumbered section 5027 of this title as this section.

Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 115–232, §809(a), substituted "section 8014(c)(1)(F)" for "section 5014(c)(1)(F)".

2016—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 114–328 struck out second sentence which read as follows: "An officer assigned to that position shall be an officer in the grade of rear admiral."

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2018 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 115–232 effective Feb. 1, 2019, with provision for the coordination of amendments and special rule for certain redesignations, see section 800 of Pub. L. 115–232, set out as a note preceding section 3001 of this title.
II

Calendar No. 59

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 92

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

FEBRUARY 24, 1999

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and

Public Works

MARCH 17, 1999

Reported by Mr. CHAFEE, without amendment

AN ACT

To designate the Federal building and United States courthouse located at 251 North Main Street in WinstonSalem, North Carolina, as the ‘‘Hiram H. Ward Federal

Building and United States Courthouse’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

4 The Federal building and United States courthouse

5 located at 251 North Main Street in Winston-Salem,

6 North Carolina, shall be known and designated as the

7 ‘‘Hiram H. Ward Federal Building and United States

8 Courthouse’’.
2

HR 92 RS

1 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

2 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

3 paper, or other record of the United States to the Federal

4 building referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be

5 a reference to the ‘‘Hiram H. Ward Federal Building and

6 United States Courthouse’’.

Passed the House of Representatives February 23,

1999.

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL,

Clerk.

Calendar No. 59

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 92

AN ACT

To designate the Federal building and United

States Courthouse’’.‘‘Hiram H. Ward Federal Building and UnitedStreet in Winston-Salem, North Carolina, as theStates courthouse located at 251 North Main

MARCH 17, 1999

Reported without amendment
#### § 115.609 Will you be allowed to present testimony and/or evidence at the hearing?

Yes, you or your guardian, as applicable, will be provided the opportunity to present testimony and/or evidence as to the reasons the BIA should not restrict your IIM account, including information showing how an encumbrance may create an undue financial hardship, if applicable. You may not challenge a court order or judgment in this proceeding. However, if you have appealed an order or judgment from a court of competent jurisdiction, you or your guardian, as applicable, may present evidence of your appeal and the BIA hearing will be postponed until there is a final order from the court. The restriction on your IIM account will remain in place until after the hearing is concluded.
Exhibit 32.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of OMI Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Craig H.
Stevenson, Jr., Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

|1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                              
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|  
|2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
|  

|Date: |  | August 9, 2005 |  | By: |  | /s/ Craig H. Stevenson, Jr.        
|----- |  | -------------- |  | --- |  | -----------------------------------
|      |  |                |  |     |  |                                    
|      |  |                |  |     |  | Craig H. Stevenson, Jr. Chairman of
|      |  |                |  |     |  | the Board and Chief Executive      
|      |  |                |  |     |  | Officer                            







A signed original of this statement required by Section 906 has been provided to OMI Corporation and will be retained by OMI Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its Staff upon request.

---
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Corporate Trust Services**

  MAC R1204-010  9062 Old Annapolis Road  Columbia, MD 21045  Tel: 410 884 2000  Fax: 410 715 2380 |
|--------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

Wells Fargo CommercialMortgage Securities, Inc.

375 PARK AVE FL 2

Wells Fargo Securities, LLC

NEW YORK, New York 10152-0002

 

Re:          Annual Statement of Compliance for Wells Fargo Commercial Mortgage Securities,Inc., Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2012-C6

 

Per the Pooling and ServicingAgreement dated as of April 1, 2012 (the "Agreement"), the undersigned,a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as CertificateAdministrator ("Wells Fargo"), hereby certifies as follows as of andfor the year ending December 31, 2016 (the "Reporting Period"):

 

(a) A review of WellsFargo's activities during the Reporting Period and of its performance under theAgreement has been made under such officer's supervision; and

 

(b) To the best of suchofficer's knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of itsobligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout theReporting Period.

 

 

February 27, 2017

 

 

/s/Brian Smith

BRIAN SMITH

Vice President

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together we’ll go far |
|------------------------|------------------------------------|