alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 1000.108 How are self-governance base budgets established?

At the request of the Tribe/Consortium, a self-governance base budget identifying each Tribe's funding amount is included in BIA's budget justification for the following year, subject to Congressional appropriation.
§ 601.6 Resolving disputes over Lead Agency status. ( a ) In the event of a dispute with a Federal Agency applicant over Co-Lead Agency status, the parties shall use their best efforts to cooperatively resolve disputes at the working levels of their respective agencies and, if necessary, by elevating such disputes within their respective agencies.
( b ) If internal resolution at higher agency levels proves unsuccessful, at NCPC's sole discretion, one of the following actions shall be pursued: The parties shall request CEQ's determination on which agency shall serve as Lead, or NCPC shall prepare its own Environmental Document, or NCPC shall decline to take action on the underlying application.
( c ) Disputes other than those relating to the designation of Lead Agency status or Cooperating Agency status as described in § 601.7(b), shall be governed by the requirements of subpart G of this part.
#### Leo Fritz v. The State.

No. 22626.

Delivered December 15, 1943.

The opinion states the case.

*Bert G. Ashby,*of Dallas, of appellant.

*Spurgeon E. Bell,*State’s Attorney, of Austin, for the State.

KRUEGER, Judge.

The offense is the possession of whisky in a container to which no stamp was affixed showing the payment of the tax due thereon to the State of Texas. The punishment assessed is a fine of $500.00.

The record discloses that on the first day of May, 1943, appellant appeared in the office of the county judge, which is located in the court house of Lamar County, waived a jury and entered a plea of guilty to the charge. The court received his plea and assessed his punishment as above stated. The term of the court expired at midnight of the same day. Thereafter, on the 28th day of May, appellant filed a motion protesting the entry of a judgment nunc pro tunc on the ground that the judgment pronounced against him by the court on the first day of May was void and of no force and effect inasmuch as his trial was had in the private office of the judge and not in the regular court room. The court overruled the motion and entered the judgment nunc pro tunc, to which appellant excepted and brings the matter to this court for review by a bill of exception. The *452court qualified the bill with the statement that his office, where appellant entered the plea of guilty, was located in the court house of Lamar County; that no one was ever denied admittance to his office during the proceedings.

The question here presented was this day decided by this court adversely to appellant’s contention. See Tischmacher v. State, No. 22,627. (Page 464 of this volume). For the reasons therein stated the judgment of the trial court is in all things affirmed.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission' of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
§ 141.39 Sale and redemption of pawn. ( a ) If the retention period has expired and notice as required under § 141.38 of this part has been sent and received, the pledgee may proceed with the sale of the pawn.
( b ) The pawn shall be sold no sooner than thirty (30) days but no later than twelve (12) months after notice of intent to sell has been given. The sale shall be a public sale, with notice of the time, place, and manner to be given in a tribal newspaper of general circulation not less than fourteen (14) days prior to the sale, or in the absence of such a newspaper, in a commercially reasonable manner. The sale itself shall also be conducted in a commercially reasonable manner.
( c ) A pledgor may redeem pawn which has been put up for sale at any time before the day it is to be sold by tendering to the pledgee the face amount of the loan, plus the finance charge assessed on the original loan. The pledgee may also collect an additional charge covering the period between the date due and the date of redemption, provided that the rate of charge does not exceed the finance charge on the original loan.
( d ) The pledgee may buy at the pledgee's own sale if the collateral is of a type customarily sold in a recognized market or which is the subject of widely distributed standard price quotations.
( e ) Pawn held for more than twelve (12) months after notice of intent to sell has been given may not be sold, but the pledgor may redeem the pawn at any time by tendering to the pledgee the face amount of the loan, plus the finance charge that accrued before the end of the sale period provided in paragraph (b) of this section.
[40 FR 39837, Aug. 29, 1975, as amended at 41 FR 3288, Jan. 22, 1976. Redesignated at 47 FR 13327, Mar. 30, 1982]
Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Hometown Auto Retailers, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Corey
E. Shaker, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


/s/  Corey E. Shaker
-------------------------------------
President and Chief Executive Officer
August 12, 2002


                                       31
### §8453. Midshipmen: appointment

Midshipmen at the Naval Academy shall be appointed by the President alone. An appointment is conditional until the midshipman is admitted.

(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 429, §6953; Pub. L. 97–60, title II, §203(b)(1), Oct. 14, 1981, 95 Stat. 1006; renumbered §8453, Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, §807(c)(1), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1836.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

This section is included in this chapter without specific reference to statutory source to resolve the ambiguities and conflicts existing in the statutes relating to the appointment of midshipmen at the Naval Academy. The word "appoint" has been used in various statutes when the intent of Congress was to provide authority in the persons named to "choose," "select," or "nominate" for the office of midshipman. These statutes have been collected and codified in §6954 of this title, which reflects the various sources of nominees for "appointment" as midshipmen and the persons who may so "nominate" them. The actual appointing power resides in the President and this implied authority is herein expressed for clarity and for the purpose of uniformity of expression.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–232 renumbered section 6953 of this title as this section.

1981—Pub. L. 97–60 inserted provision that an appointment is conditional until the midshipman is admitted.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2018 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 115–232 effective Feb. 1, 2019, with provision for the coordination of amendments and special rule for certain redesignations, see section 800 of Pub. L. 115–232, set out as a note preceding section 3001 of this title.

#### Effective Date of 1981 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 97–60 effective with respect to nominations for appointment to the first class admitted to each Academy after Oct. 14, 1981, see section 203(d) of Pub. L. 97–60, set out as an Effective Date note under section 7441a of this title.
§ 17.3 Pleadings, notice and hearings. ( a ) The petition for approval of the will of a deceased Osage Indian may be set down for hearing at a date not less than 30 days from the date the petition is filed. Hearings shall be conducted only after notice of the time and place of such hearings shall have been given by mail. The notice shall be mailed not less than 10 days preceding the date of the hearing and shall state that the special attorney will, at the time and place specified therein, take testimony to determine whether the will of the deceased Osage Indian shall be approved or disapproved. The notice shall list the presumptive heirs of the decedent and the beneficiaries under such will, and shall notify the attesting witnesses to be present and testify. It shall state that all persons interested in the estate of the decedent may be present at the hearing. The notice shall further state that the special attorney may, in his discretion, continue the hearing to another time or place to be announced at the original hearing.
( b ) Any interested party desiring to contest approval of the will may, not less than 5 days before the date set for hearing, file written objections in triplicate, showing that a copy thereof was served upon attorneys for the proponent and other attorneys of record in the case. Such contestant shall clearly state the interest he takes under the will and, if a presumptive heir, the interest he would take under the Oklahoma law. The contestant shall further state specifically the ground on which his contest is based.
### §2241a. Prohibition on use of funds for publicity or propaganda purposes within the United States

Funds available to the Department of Defense may not be obligated or expended for publicity or propaganda purposes within the United States not otherwise specifically authorized by law.

(Added Pub. L. 111–84, div. A, title X, §1031(a)(1), Oct. 28, 2009, 123 Stat. 2448.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Pub. L. 111–84, div. A, title X, §1031(b), Oct. 28, 2009, 123 Stat. 2448, provided that: "Section 2241a of title 10, United States Code, as added by subsection (a), shall take effect on October 1, 2009, or the date of the enactment of this Act [Oct. 28, 2009], whichever is later."
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ANGELINE MAMAH FORCHA,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 07-70123

Agency No. A096-289-115

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted January 10, 2011** 

Before: BEEZER, TALLMAN, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.

Angeline Mamah Forcha, a native and citizen of Cameroon, petitions pro se

for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing her appeal from

an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying her application for asylum,

withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture

FILED

JAN 19 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 07-70123

(“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial

evidence the agency’s factual findings, Chebchoub v. INS, 257 F.3d 1038, 1042

(9th Cir. 2001), and we deny the petition for review. 

Substantial evidence supports the IJ’s finding that Forcha is not credible

based on the inconsistency between her testimony and her asylum application

regarding whether she left the house while she was in hiding. See id. at 1043

(inconsistencies in testimony about events leading up to departure supported

adverse credibility determination). Substantial evidence also supports the IJ’s

finding that Forcha is not credible because her testimony regarding the location of

her April 1997 detention was inconsistent with the letter from her pastor. See Pal

v. INS, 204 F.3d 935, 938 (9th Cir. 2000) (inconsistencies between testimony and

documentary evidence support an adverse credibility finding). The IJ reasonably

rejected her explanations for the inconsistencies. See Rivera v. Mukasey, 508 F.3d

1271, 1275 (9th Cir. 2007). In the absence of credible testimony, Forcha’s asylum

and withholding of removal claims fail. See Farah v. Ashcroft, 348 F.3d 1153,

1156 (9th Cir. 2003). 

Because Forcha’s CAT claim is based on the same evidence that the agency

found not credible, and she points to no other evidence showing it is more likely
3 07-70123

than not she would be tortured if she returns to Cameroon, Forcha’s CAT claim

also fails. See id. at 1156-57. 

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A24A0746. RANDY CLAY v. THE STATE.

Randy Clay was convicted of multiple counts of aggravated child molestation

and related offenses, and his convictions were affirmed on appeal. See Clay v. State,

Case No. A15A0766 (July 9, 2015) (affirming convictions but remanding for

resentencing because of a merger issue). He subsequently filed a motion to correct a

void sentence, claiming that his convictionsshould be set aside because a witnessfor

the State gave perjured testimony. The trial court denied the motion, and Clay filed

this appeal. We, however, lack jurisdiction. 

A post-conviction motion seeking to vacate an allegedly void conviction is not

a valid procedure in a criminal case, and any appeal from the denial or dismissal of

such a motion must be dismissed. See Williams v. State, 287 Ga. 192, 194 (695 SE2d

244) (2010); Roberts v. State, 286 Ga. 532, 532 (690 SE2d 150) (2010). A direct

appeal may lie from the denial of a motion to correct a void sentence if the defendant

raises a colorable claim that the sentence is void. See Burg v. State, 297 Ga. App.

118, 119 (676 SE2d 465) (2009). But “[m]otions to vacate a void sentence generally

are limited to claimsthat – even assuming the existence and validity of the conviction

for which the sentence was imposed – the law does not authorize that sentence, most

typically because it exceeds the most severe punishment for which the applicable

penal statute provides.” von Thomas v. State, 293 Ga. 569, 572 (2) (748 SE2d 446)

(2013). 

Here, Clay’s motion does not allege that his sentence exceeds the maximum

allowed by law. Instead, Clay alleges that his convictions were based on perjured

testimony and prosecutorial misconduct. These are not valid void-sentence

January 29, 2024
arguments. Accordingly, Clay’s appeal is hereby DISMISSED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

01/29/2024
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          22,439
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   26,866
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,557
<INVENTORY>                                      5,018
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                55,557
<PP&E>                                          36,583
<DEPRECIATION>                                   7,475
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 339,727
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           42,136
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      3,394
<COMMON>                                             8
<OTHER-SE>                                     281,837
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   339,727
<SALES>                                         23,867
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                35,149
<CGS>                                           20,306
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   28,038
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                36,395
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   286
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  82
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (29,744)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (29,744)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (29,744)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.43)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.43)


</TABLE>
Exhibit
32.2


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO




18
U.S.C.  SECTION 1350




AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO




SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of General Metals Corporation (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended January 31, 2009 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
Daniel J. Forbush, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my
knowledge:




(1)           the
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)           the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




Dated:
December 18, 2009.






/S/ Daniel J.
Forbush


Daniel J.
Forbush


Chief
Financial Officer


(Principal
Financial Officer and
Principal Accounting Officer)
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

# Alaskan Soldier is a Face of the Guard in His Small Rural Community

By Sgt. Marisa Lindsay

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More Articles/News
### §1083. Contracts for medical care for spouses and children: additional hospitalization

If a dependent covered by a plan under section 1079 of this title needs hospitalization beyond the time limits in that plan, and if the hospitalization is authorized in medical facilities of the uniformed services, he may be transferred to such a facility for additional hospitalization. If transfer is not feasible, the expenses of additional hospitalization in the civilian facility may be paid under such regulations as the Secretary of Defense may prescribe after consulting the other administering Secretaries.

(Added Pub. L. 85–861, §1(25)(B), Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1449; amended Pub. L. 96–513, title V, §511(36), Dec. 12, 1980, 94 Stat. 2923; Pub. L. 98–557, §19(10), Oct. 30, 1984, 98 Stat. 2870.)

| Revised section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1083 | 37:423. | June 7, 1956, ch. 374, §303, 70 Stat. 254. |

The words "dependent covered by a plan under section 1079 of this title" are substituted for the words "person who is covered under an insurance, medical service, or health plan or plans, as provided in this chapter". The words "period of", "or plans", and "required by such person in a civilian facility" are omitted as surplusage.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 1083, act Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 87, related to transmission, delivery, and return of post cards, ballots, etc., prior to repeal by Pub. L. 85–861, §36B(5), Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1570, as superseded by the Federal Voting Assistance Act of 1955 which is classified to subchapter I–D (§1973cc et seq.) of chapter 20 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare.

#### Amendments

1984—Pub. L. 98–557 substituted reference to other administering Secretaries for reference to Secretary of Health and Human Services.

1980—Pub. L. 96–513 substituted "Secretary of Health and Human Services" for "Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1980 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 96–513 effective Dec. 12, 1980, see section 701(b)(3) of Pub. L. 96–513, set out as a note under section 101 of this title.
Exhibit 32.2

                                  CERTIFICATION

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of GPC Capital Corp. II on Form
10-Q for the period ended June 27, 2004 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John E. Hamilton,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of GPC Capital Corp. II.

Date: August 10, 2004


                                        By: /s/ John E. Hamilton
                                           -----------------------------------
                                           John E. Hamilton
                                           Vice President, Secretary and
                                           Assistant Treasurer and Director
                                           (chief financial officer)








































                                       1