# EUR-Lex - 52014DC0637 - EN

*|*

# 52014DC0637

**AMENDING LETTER No 1 TO THE DRAFT GENERAL BUDGET 2015 STATEMENT OF EXPENDITURE BY SECTION Section III – Commission Section VIII – European Ombudsman /* COM/2014/0637 final - 2014/ () */**

			*

			*

AMENDING LETTER No 1
TO THE DRAFT GENERAL BUDGET 2015

STATEMENT OF EXPENDITURE BY SECTION
Section III – Commission
Section VIII – European Ombudsman

Having regard to:

– 
the Treaty on the Functioning of the European
Union, and in particular Article 314 thereof, in conjunction with the
Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community, and in particular
Article 106a thereof,

– 
the Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012 of the
European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2012 on the Financial Regulation
applicable to the general budget of the Union[1],
and in particular Article 39 thereof,

– 
the draft general budget of the European Union
for the financial year 2015 presented by the Commission on 24 June 2014[2],

the European
Commission hereby presents to the budgetary authority the amending letter
No 1 to the draft general budget of the European Union for the financial
year 2015 for the reasons set out in the explanatory memorandum.

TABLE OF
CONTENTS

1        Introduction.. 5

2        Agriculture
and fisheries. 5

2.1         Main changes proposed.. 5

2.2         European Agricultural
Guarantee Fund (EAGF) 3⁄4 Market
related expenditure and direct payments  7

2.2.1          Overview.. 7

2.2.2          Detailed comments. 8

2.3         Sustainable Fisheries
Partnership Agreements. 11

2.4         Changes to the budgetary
remarks. 12

3        Redeployment
of payment appropriations. 12

3.1         Introduction: tight
situation of payments. 12

3.2         Proposed redeployment of
payment appropriations. 12

4        Delegation
of implementing tasks to executive agencies. 17

4.1         Introduction: delegation
package Autumn 2013. 17

4.2         Fast Track to Innovation
pilot scheme. 18

4.3         Agricultural promotion
measures. 18

4.4         Overall budgetary and
human resources impact. 19

5        Transformation
of posts in establishment plans. 19

5.1         Commission.. 19

5.2         European Environment
Agency.. 20

5.3         European Ombudsman.. 20

6        Conclusion.. 20

7        Summary
table by heading of the multiannual financial framework.. 21

STATEMENT OF EXPENDITURE BY SECTION

The changes to
the statement of revenue and expenditure by section are available on EUR-Lex (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/budget/www/index-en.htm).
An English version of the changes to these statements by section is attached
for information as a budgetary annex.

1            Introduction

The amending letter
No 1 (AL 1) to the draft budget for 2015 (DB 2015) covers the
following:

3⁄4 
The updating of the estimated needs and
appropriations for agricultural expenditure. In addition to changing market
factors, the AL 1/2015 also incorporates the impact of decisions in the
agricultural sector since the DB 2015 was drawn up in June 2014, revised
estimates of needs for some direct payments, as well as other proposals
expected to have a significant effect during the budget year.

3⁄4 
An update of the situation for Sustainable
Fisheries Partnership Agreements, to take account of the most recent information
available.

3⁄4 
A redeployment of payment appropriations, which makes
use of the reduced appropriations for agricultural expenditure in 2015 (amounting
to EUR 448,0 million) to meet additional payment needs across headings 1a, 2, 3
and 4, so that obligations stemming from past and current commitments can be
honoured and financial penalties avoided. The redeployment is made possible by
the increased assigned revenues available for the European Agricultural
Guarantee Fund (EAGF) in 2015, enabling a slightly higher level of EAGF
expenditure to be financed with a reduced level of ‘fresh’ appropriations in the
2015 budget.

3⁄4 
The adjustment of human and financial resources in
view of the foreseen delegation of the Fast Track to Innovation pilot scheme to
the Executive Agency for Small and Medium-sized Enterprises (EASME) and the
Agricultural promotion measures to the Consumers, Health and Food Executive
Agency (CHAFEA).

3⁄4 
A transformation of posts in the establishment
plans of the Commission, the European Ombudsman and the European Environment
Agency (EEA). The requested conversion of Commission posts leads to a saving of
administrative expenditure under heading 5 of EUR 0,47 million. The
corresponding payment appropriations become available for redeployment.

The net budgetary impact of these changes
is a reduction of EUR 448,5 million in commitment appropriations compared
to the draft budget 2015. The overall level of payments remains unchanged.

2            Agriculture
and fisheries

2.1         Main
changes proposed

According
to the present AL 1/2015, overall appropriations requested for
heading 2 in 2015 are estimated at EUR 58 805,7 million. This
leaves a margin of EUR 793,3 million in commitment appropriations
below the corresponding MFF ceiling. The modifications proposed for the European
Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) in AL 1/2015 compared to the DB 2015 increase
the margin by EUR 448,0 million. EAGF payment appropriations in AL 1/2015 are
revised by the same amount as the commitment appropriations, which allows
redeployment of payment appropriations to certain other programmes in headings
1a, 2, 3 and heading 4 (see section 3 below). The modifications proposed for
Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Agreements (SFPAs) are neutral, since the increase
for budget article 11 03 01 (+ EUR 710 000, both in commitment and
payment appropriations) is balanced by a corresponding reduction on the reserve
line.

Appropriations
for agricultural expenditure financed under the EAGF in AL 1/2015 are
budgeted at EUR 43 455,8 million, which is below its 2015 net sub-ceiling of EUR
44 189,8 million[3]. The reduction of appropriations compared to DB 2015 is compensated
by the additional revenue assigned to the EAGF, which provides higher availabilities
to finance EAGF measures. Total needs for the EAGF (after financial discipline
and before possible use of the agricultural crisis reserve) are increasing, mainly
due to the financial consequences of the temporary emergency measures following
the Russian embargo on imports of certain agricultural products from the EU,
which are currently estimated at EUR 344,3 million. When excluding this
extraordinary impact, the ‘regular’ needs for the EAGF are only slightly
increasing compared to the DB 2015, by EUR 17 million.

The
additional needs for the temporary emergency measures do not require additional
appropriations compared to the 2015 DB, since the draft budget already included
appropriations amounting to EUR 433 million for the reserve for crises in the
agricultural sector for 2015 (budget article 05 03 10), which is intended to
cover additional needs in crisis situations. Transfers from the crisis reserve
article 05 03 10 to the operational lines in the budget chapter 05 02 will be
proposed after the adoption of the 2015 budget, depending on the possibilities
for redeployment of appropriations at that time, in accordance with the
procedure laid down in point 22 of the Interinstitutional Agreement (IIA) of 2
December 2013[4].

The
table below gives an overview of the updated needs and the budget
appropriations according to the amending letter, taking into account the
availability of assigned revenues and the crisis reserve.

EAGF || Draft Budget 2015 || Amending Letter No 1/2015 || Draft Budget 2015 incl. AL 1/2015)

Budget appropriations 2015 || 43 903,8 || -448,0 || 43 455,8

Assigned revenue available  in 2015 || 1 030,0 || +465,0 || 1 495,0

Total financial means available for the EAGF || 44 933,8 || +17,0 || 44 950,8

Total needs (after financial discipline and without crisis reserve) || 44 500,8 || +361,3 || 44  862,1

-- of which covered by the crisis reserve under budget article 05 03 10 || 0,0 || +344,3 || 344,3

Amount of the crisis reserve under budget article 05 03 10 || 433,0 || 0,0 || 433,0

-- of which still available || 433,0 || -344,3 || 88,7

Total requirements for the EAGF || 44 933,8 || +17,0 || 44 950,8

Following
the Russian embargo on imports of certain agricultural products from the EU,
the Commission adopted temporary emergency measures in the fruit/vegetables and
the dairy sectors:

- 
Withdrawal of certain fruits and vegetables for
free distribution or other destinations, green harvesting and non-harvesting,
as well as reinforced promotion measures carried out by producer organisations[5], with an overall
financial impact currently estimated at EUR 324,4 million, and

- 
Aid for private storage of butter, skimmed-milk
powder and certain cheeses, as well as extending the period for possible
buying-in into public intervention up to 31 December 2014[6], with an overall financial impact currently estimated at EUR 19,9
million.

The following table
summarises the effect of AL 1/2015 on heading 2 as a whole:

(in million EUR, rounded
figures at current prices)

|| Draft Budget 2015 || Amending Letter  No 1/2015 || Draft Budget 2015 (incl. AL1/2015)

Commitments || Payments || Commitments || Payments || Commitments || Payments

— || European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) || 43 903,8 || 43 897,0 || -448,0 || -448,0 || 43 455,8 || 43 449,0

— || European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) || 13 823,6 || 11 646,7 || || || 13 823,6 || 11 646,7

— || European Maritime and Fisheries Fund (EMFF), Regional Fisheries Management Organisations (RFMOs) and Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Agreements (SFPAs), of which: || 1 035,5 || 960,1 || || 16,0 || 1 035,5 || 976,1

|| — || Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Agreements (SFPAs) 3⁄4 Operational line (11 03 01) || 56,5 || 56,5 || 0,7 || 0,7 || 57,2 || 57,2

|| — || Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Agreements (SFPAs) 3⁄4 Reserve (40 02 41) || 88,5 || 88,5 || -0,7 || -0,7 || 87,8 || 87,8

— || Environment and climate action (Life) || 435,1 || 330,1 || || 35,0 || 435,1 || 365,1

— || Actions financed under the prerogatives of the Commission and specific competences conferred to the Commission || 5,3 || 5,3 || || || 5,3 || 5,3

— || Pilot projects and preparatory actions || p.m. || 17,7 || || || p.m. || 17,7

— || Decentralised agencies || 50,4 || 50,4 || || || 50,4 || 50,4

Total || 59 253,7 || 59 907,3 || -448,0 || -397,0 || 58 805,7 || 56 510,3

Ceiling || 59 599,0 || || || || 59 599,0 ||

Margin || 345,3 || || || || 793,3 ||

Of which EAGF || 43 903,8 || 43 897,0 || || || 43 455,8 || 43 449,0

Sub-Ceiling || 44 313,0 || || || || 44 313,0 ||

Net transfer between EAGF and EAFRD || 123,2 || || || || 123,2 ||

Sub-Margin || 286,0 || || || || 734,0 ||

2.2         European
Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) 3⁄4 Market related
expenditure and direct payments

2.2.1      Overview

The
purpose of AL 1/2015 is to ensure that the agricultural budget is based on
the most up-to-date economic data and legislative framework. By the month of
September, the Commission has at its disposal a first indication of the level
of production for 2014 and perspectives for the agricultural markets, which is
the basis for the updated estimates of the budgetary needs for 2015. Apart from
taking into account market factors, this AL 1/2015 also incorporates the
impact of other legislative decisions adopted in the agricultural sector since
the DB 2015 was drawn up, in particular for a series of Commission
Delegated and Implementing Acts on temporary emergency measures following the
Russian embargo on imports of certain agricultural products from the EU.

Overall,
2015 EAGF needs (after financial discipline and without crisis reserve)
in AL 1/2015 are estimated at EUR 44 862,1 million, compared
to EUR 44 500,8 million in DB 2015. When excluding the temporary
emergency measures that could be covered by the existing crisis reserve, other needs
in chapter 05 02 ‘Improving the competitiveness of the agricultural
sector through interventions in agricultural markets’ (- EUR 3,7 
million) slightly decrease. This also applies to the needs for chapter 05 03 ‘Direct
aids aimed at contributing to farm incomes, limiting farm incomes variability
and meeting environment and climate objectives’ (- EUR 4,8 million), while the needs
for chapter 05 07 ‘Audit of agricultural expenditure financed by the
European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF)’ increase
(+ EUR 25,4 million).

Regarding assigned
revenues, the amount expected to be available in 2015 increases
substantially, from EUR 1 030 million in DB 2015 to EUR 1
495 million in AL 1/2015 (+ EUR 465 million). This
increase mostly results from the milk superlevy (+ EUR 295 million), and to a
lesser extent from the estimates for amounts from clearance of accounts
decisions (+ EUR 60 million) and irregularities (+ EUR 10 million).
Furthermore, the AL 1/2015 incorporates a carry-over of assigned revenues
from 2014 to 2015 (+ EUR 100 million). This was not included in the DB 2015, since
at that time it was too early in the year to make an assumption for the
execution of the EAGF in 2014. This carry-over of assigned revenue comes in
addition to a carry-over of non-used appropriations of EUR 874,7 million[7], corresponding to
the limit of 2 % fixed in Article 169 (3) of the Financial Regulation, which
will be reimbursed in 2015 to farmers subject to the financial discipline.

As a result
of these updates, commitment appropriations of EUR 43 455,8 million,
which includes  an amount of EUR 433 million for the ‘Reserve for crises
in the agricultural sector’, would be required to cover EAGF needs for 2015. As
was the case for the DB 2015, this overall amount remains below the EAGF net
sub-ceiling of EUR 44 189,8 million. This means that the
appropriations for direct aids only need to be reduced by applying the
financial discipline mechanism to establish the agricultural crisis reserve 2015[8].

2.2.2      Detailed
comments

05 02 3⁄4 Interventions in agricultural markets (appropriations - EUR 3,7 million)

(in million EUR, rounded figures at current prices)

Interventions in agricultural markets || Draft Budget 2015 || Amending Letter  No 1/2015 || Draft Budget 2015 (incl. AL 1/2015)

Needs || 2 654,4 || +340,6 || 2 995,0

- of which covered by existing appropriations of the crisis reserve under Budget Article 05 03 10 || 0,0 || +344,3 || 344,3

-Estimated assigned revenue available in 2015 || 250,0 || 0,0 || 250,0

Appropriations requested || 2 404,4 || -3,7 || 2 400,7

The modifications proposed
by AL 1/2015, i.e. a reduction of the needs by EUR 3,7 million, are very minor
for ‘normal’ market interventions. Nonetheless, they are much more substantial
for temporary emergency measures adopted by the Commission following the
Russian embargo on EU imports of certain agricultural products.

Overall, the needs for
intervention measures on agricultural markets increase by EUR 340,6
million compared to the DB 2015. However, the emergency measures (amounting to EUR
344,3 million) are covered by appropriations available under the agricultural
crisis reserve. Thus far these amounts are estimates and the actual use of the
crisis reserve will be assessed, after approval of the 2015 budget, at the
moment when the transfers from the reserve article 05 03 10 to the operational
lines in budget chapter 05 02 are envisaged in accordance with the procedure
laid down in point 22 of the IIA. As the assigned revenues expected to be
available for chapter 05 02 (amounting to EUR 250 million) remain
unchanged compared to the DB 2015, the appropriations requested decrease slightly
(- EUR 3,7 million) compared to the DB 2015, in line with the needs other
than for emergency measures.

The most important
modifications are set out below.

For fruits and
vegetables, estimated needs for operational funds for producer
organisations (budget item 05 02 08 03) are higher (+ EUR 161,5 million)
than assumed for the DB 2015. However, only a limited share of this amount (EUR
9,5 million) results from an updated assessment of the actual uptake of the
measures and sligthly revised figures for national plans 2013, 2014 and 2015, taking
into account also the estimated financial impact of the possible partial
reimbursement by the EU budget of national financial assistance granted by certain
Member States according to Article 35 of Regulation (EU) 1308/2013.

The largest variation (+ EUR
151,5 million) corresponds to the financial impact of the temporary crisis
measures (withdrawal for free distribution and other destinations, non
harvesting and green harvesting measures as well as reinforced promotion for
fruits and vegetables) carried out by producer organisations on top of their
normal plans. A further amount of EUR 172,9 million is estimated to be required
for the same crisis measures carried out by producers that are not members of
such recognised producer groups, which will be financed from budget item 05 02
08 99. However, an estimated amount of EUR 324,4 million in appropriations stemming
from the agricultural crisis reserve under budget article 05 03 10 could be
available to finance the crisis measures in the fruits and vegetables sector.
Consequently, the appropriations proposed in the AL 1/2015 are actually very
similar to those in the 2015 DB, taking into account a minor downward
revision (- EUR 10 million) for aid to producer groups for preliminary
recognition (budget item 05 02 08 11) based on the latest information of
provisional execution in 2014.

Appropriations for promotion
measures in favour of agricultural products are increased by EUR 3 million
on budget item 05 02 10 01, reflecting the estimated financial impact for 2015
of a specific call for proposals that the Commission launched to encourage the
reorientation of exports after the closure of the Russian market. Finally, a minor
modification (- EUR 99 000) is proposed for budget item 05 02 10 02, so as to
ensure the budget neutrality of the proposed delegation of a part of the
agricultural promotion measures to the CHAFEA, together with a reduction in appropriations
under heading 5 (see section 4.3 below).

Modifications for other
plant products/measures (budget article 05 02 11) concern
the POSEI programmes (- EUR 16,0 million). The DB 2015 estimates on the
use of the modified ceilings for the POSEI regions[9] have been updated, resulting in a minor additional increase of
appropriations (+ EUR 2,8 million) for market support measures
financed from budget item 05 02 11 04. This is more than
compensated by a shift to POSEI direct aids schemes, of which EUR 1 million for
POSEIMA to budget item 05 03 02 50 and EUR 17,8 million for the Aegean Islands
to budget item 05 03 02 52.

For milk and milk
products, the AL 1/2015 takes into account the additional needs of EUR
19,9 million. this corresponds to the estimated financial impact of the
temporary emergency measures (private storage aid for butter, skimmed milk
powder and certain cheeses) taken by the Commission in response of the Russian
embargo on imports from the EU. As for fruits and vegetables, these measures
are supposed to be covered by appropriations available under the agricultural
crisis reserve, which could be proposed to be transferred after the adoption of
the 2015 budget to the items in budget article 05 02 12 according to the needs
(budget item 05 02 12 02, 05 02 12 04 and 05 02 12 99). The appropriations requested
for budget article 05 02 12 accordingly remain unchanged compared to DB 2015.

Appropriations for budget
article 05 02 15 (pigmeat, eggs and poultry, bee-keeping and other
animal products) are proposed to be increased by EUR 8,8 million,
reflecting revised needs for exceptional support measures for the eggs and
poultry sector in Italy linked to the avian influenza situation between
September 2013 and June 2014[10].

05 03 3⁄4 Direct Aids (appropriations
- EUR 469,8 million)

(in million EUR, rounded figures at current prices)

Direct Aids || Draft Budget 2015 || Amending Letter  No 1/2015 || Draft Budget 2015 (incl. AL 1/2015)

After financial discipline (including credits for the ‘Reserve for crises in the agricultural sector’)

Needs || 42 158,4 || -4,8 || 42 153,6

- Estimated assigned revenue available in 2015 || 780,0 || +465,0 || 1 245,0

Appropriations requested || 41 378,4 || -469,8 || 40 908,6

Compared
to the DB 2015, appropriations requested for chapter 05 03 are revised
downwards by EUR 469,8 million. This change is the combined effect of
slightly lower needs (- EUR 4,8 million) and an increase in the
amount of assigned revenue (+EUR 465 million). The most significant
variations correspond to the transfers, in particular from the Single Payment
Scheme (SPS) and the Single Area Payment Scheme (SAPS), to the Redistributive
payment (05 03 01 07), an increase for POSEI direct aids following transfers
from market support measures in these regions and a reduction for decoupled and
coupled specific support under Article 68 of Regulation (EU) No 73/2009
reflecting updated assumptions on execution in 2015.

AL 1/2015 reduces the
appropriations for the SPS (budget item 05 03 01 01) by EUR 810 million
compared to the 2015 DB. The needs for this scheme (before financial
discipline) have been reduced by EUR 345 million. This corresponds mainly
to the transfer made by some Member States to the Redistributive payment (05 03
01 07). Furthermore, the revenue assigned to the SPS increases by EUR 465 million.

For the SAPS
(budget item 05 03 01 02) AL 1/2015 proposes to decrease the
budget appropriations by EUR 92 million, which corresponds mainly to
the transfer to the Redistributive payment (05 03 01 07). Appropriations for
this budget item increase by EUR 440 million compared to the DB 2015, which
contained a token entry (p.m.), as notifications from Member States for this
new regime were not available.

(in million EUR, rounded figures at current prices)

(Selected) Decoupled direct aids[11] || Draft Budget 2015 || Amending Letter  No 1/2015 || Draft Budget 2015 (incl. AL 1/2015)

05 03 01 01 3⁄4 SPS (Single Payment Scheme) || 29 152,0 || -810,0 || 28 342,0

05 03 01 02 3⁄4 SAPS (Single Area Payment Scheme) || 7 898,0 || -92,0 || 7 806,0

05 03 01 07 3⁄4 Redistributive payment || p.m. || +440,0 || 440,0

Total || 37 050,0 || -462,0 || 36 588,0

AL 1/2015 proposes to
decrease budget appropriations for the specific support under
Article 68 of Regulation (EC) No 73/2009 by EUR 4 million
for decoupled support (budget item 05 03 01 05) and by
EUR 17 million for coupled support (budget item
05 03 02 44). These modifications mostly correspond to
adjustments in the expected execution rate on the basis of most recent figures
for 2014.

(in million EUR, rounded figures at current prices)

Direct Aids[12] || Draft Budget 2015 || Amending Letter  No 1/2015 || Draft Budget 2015 (incl. AL 1/2015)

05 03 01 05 3⁄4 Decoupled support || 511,0 || -4,0 || 507,0

05 03 02 44 3⁄4 Coupled support || 1 447,0 || -17,0 || 1 430,0

Total || 1 958,0 || -21,0 || 1 937,0

There are some further
changes for budget lines within chapter 05 03, but the variations are
comparatively small. The most significant change relates to the transfer from
market measures to direct aids in the POSEI regions, in particular for the
Aegean Islands (budget item 05 03 02 52).

(in million EUR, rounded figures at current prices)

Direct Aids[13] || Draft Budget 2015 || Amending Letter  No 1/2015 || Draft Budget 2015 (incl. AL 1/2015)

05 03 01 03 3⁄4 Separate sugar payment || 282,0 || -4,0 || 278,0

05 03 02 50 3⁄4 POSEI – European Union support programmes || 420,0 || +1,0 || 421,0

05 03 02 52 3⁄4 POSEI – Aegean Islands || 0,2 || +17,8 || 18,0

05 03 02 99 3⁄4 Other (direct aids) || 7,8 || -1,6 || 6,2

Total || 710,0 || +13,2 || 723,2

05 07
Audit of agricultural expenditure (appropriations
- EUR 25,4 million)

(in million EUR, rounded figures at current prices)

Audit of agricultural expenditure || Draft Budget 2015 || Amending Letter  No 1/2015 || Draft Budget 2015 (incl. AL 1/2015)

05 07 02 3⁄4 Settlement of disputes || 61,9 || +25,4 || 87,3

Total || 61,9 || +25,4 || 87,3

Appropriations for budget
article 05 07 02 (Settlement of disputes) need to be increased by
EUR 25,4 million to cover the potential reimbursement of compensatory
interests under national law of the Member State following the Court of Justice
judgement in case C-113/10 Jülich et al. invalidating the Commission
Regulations fixing sugar production levies for marketing years 2002/03 to
2005/06.

2.3         Sustainable
Fisheries Partnership Agreements

As foreseen in point C of Part II of the Interinstitutional
Agreement (IIA), the Commission has examined the most recent information
available concerning Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Agreements. To reflect
the latest situation, i.e. the recent conclusion of the agreement with São Tomé and Príncipe, the Commission proposes to shift commitment
and payment appropriations from the reserve article 40 02 41 to budget article
11 03 01 Establishing a governance framework for fishing activities carried out
by Union fishing vessels in third country waters (SFPAs), for an amount of EUR 0,7
million.

(in million EUR, rounded figures at current prices)

Sustainable fisheries partnership agreements || Draft Budget 2015 || Amending Letter  No 1/2015 || Draft Budget 2015 (incl. AL1/2015)

Commitments || Payments || Commitments || Payments || Commitments || Payments

Operational line (11 03 01) || 56,5 || 56,5 || +0,7 || +0,7 || 57,2 || 57,2

Reserve (40 02 41) || 88,5 || 88,5 || -0,7 || -0,7 || 87,8 || 87,8

Total || 145,0 || 145,0 || 0,0 || 0,0 || 145,0 || 145,0

2.4         Changes
to the budgetary remarks

The budgetary remarks for the following chapters,
articles and items have been updated:

Heading || Explanation

Expenditure

05 02 || Interventions in agricultural markets || Figures for assigned revenues

05 03 || Direct aids || Figures for assigned revenues

11 03 01 || Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Agreements || Change in budgetary remarks: table

Revenue

6 7 0 1 || Clearance of EAGF accounts – Assigned revenue || Figures for assigned revenue

6 7 0 2 || EAGF irregularities – Assigned revenue || Figures for assigned revenue

6 7 0 3 || Superlevy from milk producers – Assigned revenue || Figures for assigned revenue

3            Redeployment
of payment appropriations

3.1         Introduction: tight
situation of payments

When presenting the 2015 draft
budget, the Commission underlined the general tight situation for payment
appropriations, at a time when the level of outstanding commitments for the
2007-2013 programmes has to be brought to an orderly level and sufficient payment
appropriations must be available for the launch of the 2014-2020 programmes. In
the DB 2015 the Commission requested payment appropriations up to the 2015 MFF
ceiling for payments, which is EUR 2 billion below the level of the implemented
budget in 2013. The Commission stated that it will continue to monitor the
payments situation closely, and that it would propose correcting measures as
necessary to ensure the delivery and full implementation of the policies it has
been entrusted with.

The sustained high level
of payment implementation in 2014 across all policy areas and the expected
outstanding payment needs at the end of 2014, mean that even after the adoption
of DAB 3/2014 as proposed by the Commission, the estimated payment needs in
2015 go beyond the Commission's DB 2015 request for a number of programmes.
That is why the Commission proposes to redeploy EUR 448,0 million in payment
appropriations that have become available following the revision of needs for
agricultural expenditure, as set out in section 2 above. In addition, an amount of EUR 0,47 million is available following
the conversion of AST posts into AST/SC posts in Commission establishment plans, as set out in section 5 below.

3.2         Proposed
redeployment of payment appropriations

The redeployment proposed
in this amending letter aims at reinforcing payment appropriations for a number
of programmes/actions for which payment implementation in 2014 points to higher
 payment requirements than requested in the DB 2015, even after taking into
account the previously proposed reinforcements of payment appropriations in DAB
3/2014 and the Global Transfer (DEC 31/2014).

The table below gives an
overview of the proposed redeployment of payment appropriations by heading and
budget line.

In EUR
million, rounded figures

Budget line || Name || Redeployment of payment appropriations in AL 1/2015

Heading 1a ||

Financial operations and instruments || 5,5

01 04 51 || Completion of programmes in the field of small and medium-sized enterprises (SME's) prior to 2014 || 5,5

Horizon 2020 || 75,0

09 04 51 || Completion of the Seventh Framework programme  (2007 to 2013) || 57,0

15 03 01 01 || Marie Sklodowska-Curie actions – generating, developing and transferring new skills, knowledge and innovation || 18,0

Customs and Fiscalis || 9,0

14 02 51 || Completion of former programmes in customs || 6,5

14 03 51 || Completion of former programmes on taxation || 2,5

Fight against fraud || 1,5

24 02 01 || Preventing and combating fraud, corruption and any other illegal activities affecting the Union's financial interests || 1,5

Interoperability Solutions for European Public Administrations (ISA) || 4,0

26 03 01 01 || Interoperability Solutions for European Public Administrations || 4,0

European Energy Programme for Recovery (EEPR) || 145,0

32 02 52 || Completion of energy projects to aid economic recovery || 145,0

Sub-total heading 1a         || 240,0

Heading 2 ||

Life+ || 35,0

07 02 51 || Completion of previous environmental programmes || 35,0

European Fisheries Fund || 16,0

11 06 12 || Completion of European Fisheries Fund (EFF) – Convergence objective (2007-2013) || 16,0

Sub-total heading 2            || 51,0

Heading 3 ||

Creative Europe || 5,5

15 04 03 || MEDIA sub-programme – operating transnationally and internationally and promoting transnational circulation and mobility || 5,5

Sub-total heading 3            || 5,5

Heading 4 ||

European Neighbourhood Instrument (ENI) || 50,0

21 03 51 || Completion of actions in the area of European Neighbourhood Policy and relations with Russia (prior to 2014) || 50,0

Development Cooperation Instrument (DCI) || 87,0

21 02 51 01 || Cooperation with third countries in the areas of migration and asylum || 7,0

21 02 51 02 || Cooperation with developing countries in Latin America || 13,0

21 02 51 03 || Cooperation with developing countries in Asia, including Central Asia and the Middle East || 20,0

21 02 51 04 || Food security || 12,0

21 02 51 05 || Non-State actors in development || 5,0

21 02 51 06 || Environment and sustainable management of natural resources, including energy || 5,0

21 02 51 07 || Human and social development || 5,0

21 02 51 08 || Geographical cooperation with Africa, Caribbean and Pacific States || 20,0

European Instrument for Democracy and Human Rights (EIDHR) || 5,0

21 04 51 || Completion of the European Instrument for Democracy and Human Rights (prior to 2014) || 5,0

Instrument contributing to Stability and Peace (IcSP) || 10,0

19 02 01 || Response to crisis and emerging crisis || 10,0

Sub-total heading 4            || 152,0

Total || 448,5

The section below provides
justifications for the proposed reinforcements of payment appropriations for
2015, by programme and in descending order of magnitude:

European Energy
Programme for Recovery (EEPR): EUR 145 million

The completion of the European
Energy Programme for Recovery (EEPR) is progressing faster than expected and a
significant backlog of payments, which was not factored in into the
Commission's DB 2015 proposal, will be carried over from 2014 to 2015. For
2014, the Commission has already requested a reinforcement of EUR 55 million
through DAB 3/2014, and a further EUR 10 million in the Global
Transfer. In addition, all options for internal transfers within the energy
policy area as well as for reusing assigned revenue stemming from recoveries
have been fully exploited. Still, the payments due by the end of the year
exceed by some EUR 145 million the potential availabilities and these unpaid
bills of 2014 will add an unforeseen additional burden onto the 2015 budget. It
should be noted that some of the pending payments are already accumulating late
interest charges and others are approaching the deadline to pay. It is
estimated that the late interest due by the end of 2014 may reach EUR 1,2
million.

Development Cooperation
Instrument (DCI): EUR 87 million

Reinforcement of payment
appropriations is necessary across the budget lines for the completion of the
2007-2013 thematic and regional programmes under the DCI to avoid jeopardising
the implementation of projects in 2015. Implementation at end-September 2014 (Completion
of DCI prior to 2014, budget article 21 02 51) stood at 92 %, whereas implementation
to date in 2013 stood at 64 %. Many payment requests arriving towards the end
of 2014 will only be paid in 2015, which creates an additional burden on the
2015 budget. The detailed justifications are as follows:

3⁄4 
Cooperation with third countries in the areas of
migration and asylum: the worsening situation in the
context of the continuing tragic losses of lives in the Mediterranean and the
increasing migration flows to the EU originating in the North of Africa and the
Horn of Africa, has intensified pressure on the EU to honour signed contracts
for the Regional Protection Programmes with the UN Refugee Agency (UNHCR). All
2014 payment appropriations were already used by early September 2014. The
estimated backlog to be carried forward to 2015, after the proposed
reinforcement in the Global Transfer, amounts to EUR 14,3 million.

3⁄4 
Non-state actors in development: civil society organisations depend heavily on EU-cofinancing. Any
funding gap would jeopardise support to the needy in the poorest of countries.
The backlog by the end of 2014, after the proposed reinforcement in the Global
Transfer, is estimated at EUR 11,9 million.

3⁄4 
Environment and sustainable management of
natural resources, including energy: the requested
reinforcement would allow to pay pre-financing under 2014 contracts which will
be due during the last four months of 2014 but for which payment appropriations
in 2014 are lacking. The backlog by the end of 2014, after the proposed
reinforcement in the Global Transfer, is estimated at EUR 31,7 million.

3⁄4 
Human and social development: the amount is
intended to secure the payment of the EU contribution to global vaccination and
education initiatives, such as the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and
Malaria, the Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunisation and the Global
Partnership for Education. Payments to some of these funds (e.g. Global Fund to
Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria) will be delayed to 2015. The backlog by
the end of 2014, after the proposed reinforcement in the Global Transfer, is
estimated at EUR 6,2 million.

3⁄4 
Food security: reinforcement is needed to pay
for contracted food security projects for example in Myanmar and Nepal, as well
as to international agricultural research projects. All 2014 payment appropriations
were already used by early September 2014. The backlog by the end of 2014,
after the proposed reinforcement in the Global Transfer, is estimated at EUR
67,6 million.

3⁄4 
Cooperation with developing countries in Latin
America: all 2014 payment appropriations were already
used by early September 2014. The estimated backlog to be carried forward to
2015, after the proposed reinforcement in the Global Transfer, amounts to EUR
68,8 million. The programmes concerned are in particular aimed at poverty
reduction and socially sensitive policies, notably anti-drugs.

3⁄4 
Cooperation with developing countries in Asia,
including Central Asia and the Middle East:  developing countries in Asia like
Cambodia, Pakistan, Philippines, Nepal, Vietnam and Tajikistan receive EU assistance
by direct budget support, whose predictability is a key factor. Not paying or
delaying payments would place NGOs and international organisations in financial
difficulties, as well has having political consequences for the EU’s
reputation. All 2014 payment appropriations were already used by early
September 2014. The backlog by the end of 2014, after the proposed
reinforcement in the Global Transfer, is estimated at EUR 158,3 million.

3⁄4 
Geographical cooperation with Africa, Caribbean
and Pacific States: the reinforcement is needed in the EU Sugar support
programme to avoid interruption to ongoing contracts for road rehabilitation,
research activities on new varieties, and for final payment of supplies. All
2014 payment appropriations were already used by early September 2014. The
backlog by the end of 2014, after the proposed reinforcement in the Global
Transfer, is estimated at EUR 162,4 million.

Horizon 2020: EUR 75
million

The requested
reinforcement for the new Marie Curie actions will cover EUR 18 million of
payment appropriations related to the signature of grants resulting from 2014
calls, which had to be postponed to 2015 due to lack of available payment
appropriations in 2014, thus creating an additional burden on the 2015 budget.
The pre-financed projects will focus on mobility, training and the career
development of researchers, including doctoral fellows.

As regards the completion
of the Seventh Framework Programme for Research (budget article 09 04 51),
invoices amounting to EUR 36 million are currently incurring penalty interests
for late payment. Due to lack of payment appropriations outstanding invoices
are paid selectively, with priority given to the projects with financially more
vulnerable participants (in particular SMEs). This situation causes
reputational damage to the European Institutions and a continuation of this
situation in 2015 should be avoided.

European Neighbourhood
Instrument (ENI): EUR 50 million

The level of outstanding
commitments of the ENI as a whole currently amounts to EUR 6,8 billion. The
estimated backlog of payments to be carried forward to 2015, after the
reinforcements proposed in the DAB 3/2014 and the Global Transfer, amounts to
EUR 268 million. Reinforcement of payment appropriations for 2015 is essential
to maintain the political commitments made by the EU, such as support to the
Syrian refugees, the EU commitments to Palestine, and the politically highly
important support programmes to Georgia, Moldova and Ukraine in the context of
these countries’ Association Agreements with the EU. For Ukraine in particular,
any lack of EU support to the transition and stabilisation process would
endanger the implementation of key reform strategies that are of paramount
importance for the inclusive development of the country.

Life+: EUR 35 million

Despite reinforcements of
payment appropriations in 2014, some 170 payments related to the completion of
the Life+ programme are expected to remain pending in the following months,
many of which will carry the risk of late payment interest, and will have to be
paid at the beginning of 2015. All redeployment opportunities within the
chapter have been exhausted. The additional appropriations requested for 2015 are
intended to address the backlog at the end of 2014 and would allow covering the
most urgent legal obligations.

European Fisheries
Fund: EUR 16 million

The available
appropriations for 2014 (including the reinforcement requested in DAB 3/2014)
only allow covering the payment claims received until mid-September 2014.
Consequently, the payment claims received in the last quarter of 2014 will have
to be covered by the 2015 budget. However, historical analysis shows that
around 90 % of the 2014 payment claims are expected to arrive during the final
quarter of the year. The proposed reinforcement for 2015 is meant to address the
expected large backlog at the end of 2014, which is proportionally higher than
for other European Structural and Investment Funds.

Instrument Contributing
to Stability and Peace (IcSP): EUR 10 million

With an initial budget of
EUR 204 million in commitment appropriations and only EUR 18 million in payment
appropriations, the budget article Response to crisis and emerging crisis is
experiencing a severe shortfall of payment appropriations in 2014. Due to the
lack of payments, the Commission is delaying the launching of new actions
except for the most urgent and critical ones (Ukraine, Central African
Republic). A reinforcement of payment appropriations for 2015 is critical to
enable the Commission to implement the commitment appropriations requested in
the DB 2015 (EUR 222,6 million). Otherwise, interventions would have to be
scaled down, reducing the EU's ability to intervene quickly in crisis
situations around the globe.

Customs and Fiscalis:
EUR 9 million

A higher level of payment
appropriations than initially requested in the DB 2015 is required to honour
already signed contracts and to avoid having to pay late interests for the
completion of the Customs and Fiscalis programmes. Payment implementation in 2014
was higher than expected and a shortage of payments in 2015 seems unavoidable.
Any lack of payments could jeopardise the running of these crucial businesses
(mainly IT contracts) and time-critical operations for economic operators and
national administrations. The Commission runs some 45 customs and taxation IT
systems through major outsourcing to IT companies who have around 450 staff
working to keep operations running smoothly and ensuring high availability
rates.

Creative Europe: EUR 5,5
million

The requested increase is
necessary to provide the pre-financing for the Media operators, without which their
operational capacity would be seriously affected.

Financial operations
and instruments: EUR 5,5 million

The reinforcement requested
for the completion of the COSME programme (budget article 01 04 51) would be
targeted towards the High Growth and Innovation Facility for SMEs (venture
capital instruments and the SME Guarantee Facility) managed by the European
Investment Fund (EIF). The Commission is liable for the obligations signed by
the EIF with the financial intermediaries on its behalf and has the obligation
to keep sufficient liquidity in the trust account opened at the EIF. The
reinforcement for 2015 is based on the significant decrease of the cash balance
in the trust account due to drawdowns paid by the EIF towards financial
intermediaries between January and July 2014 and on the upwards revised
forecast recently received from the EIF of EUR 48 million. The payment
appropriations requested in the DB 2015 are not sufficient to cover the
upcoming cash flows from the trust accounts, combined with the necessity to
maintain minimum balances.

European Instrument for
Democracy and Human Rights (EIDHR): EUR 5 million

All 2014 payment
appropriations are forecast to be exhausted by October 2014, and the estimated
backlog to be carried forward to 2015, after the proposed reinforcement in the
Global Transfer, amounts to EUR 10,3 million. Over 1 500 ongoing contracts are
currently being financed by the EIDHR, of which the vast majority are grant
agreements managed locally by EU delegations, and where the beneficiaries are
NGOs and individuals, mostly working under repressive regimes and with limited
access to any other sources of funding. In order to avoid a situation in which
the Commission would have to hold back on commitments under the EIDHR because
of the shortage of payments, a reinforcement in 2015 is necessary.

Interoperability
Solutions for European Public Administrations (ISA):
EUR 4 million

The requested
reinforcement for 2015 would allow the Commission to fulfil its legal
commitments and to avoid paying late interest. The payment needs for the ISA
programme in 2015 are currently estimated at around EUR 25 million, taking into
account already signed contracts. The level of payment appropriations should
therefore be reinforced, while maintaining a prudent approach: the reinforced
level of payments in 2015 would still be below the 2014 level.

Fight against fraud:
EUR 1,5 million

The implementation of the ‘Hercule III’ programme is accelerating
following the successful call for proposals, and a reinforcement of payment appropriations for 2015 is needed.
This small programme has limited possibilities of internal redeployment and it
already faces payment shortages in 2014.

4            Delegation
of implementing tasks to executive agencies

4.1         Introduction:
delegation package Autumn 2013

In the amending
letter 2/2014[14], the Commission set out its proposals for making more use of the
existing six executive agencies to implement certain parts of 2014-2020
spending programmes. These proposals were based on a thorough cost-benefit
analysis, which was further refined by the Commission to ensure overall
budgetary neutrality of the proposed delegation of tasks to the executive agencies.
Agreement on the Commission's proposed delegation package, including on the
corresponding budgetary and human resources impact, was reached in November
2013.

Two specific proposals for
delegation had been intended to be included in the delegation package as proposed
in October 2013. However, at that time the new legal basis for the Agricultural
promotion measures was not yet adopted, whereas the agreement reached in July
2013 on the new legal basis for Horizon 2020, to include a new pilot scheme for
Fast track to Innovation, came at too late a stage to be included in the
delegation package.

The Commission now
proposes to include the budgetary and human resources impact of the foreseen
delegation of these two actions in the amending letter to the 2015 DB, as set
out below.

4.2         Fast
Track to Innovation pilot scheme

When adopting the new
mandates for the executive agencies in December 2013, the Commission already
indicated its intention to delegate the implementation of the pilot scheme for
Fast Track to Innovation (FTI) to the Executive Agency for Small and
Medium-sized Enterprises (EASME). The two-year pilot scheme is foreseen to be delegated as from 2015, with an operational budget of EUR 200 million, evenly spread over 2015 and
2016. The contribution to FTI will be redeployed from operational
appropriations programmed for Leadership in enabling and industrial
technologies (LEIT) and the seven Societal Challenges under Horizon 2020, which
were initially foreseen to be implemented both in the Commission and in the
executive agencies.

As required by Council
Regulation 58/2003[15], a cost-benefit analysis has been carried out, in order to compare
the delegation scenario (i.e. implementation by EASME) with in-house management
(i.e. within the Commission). The implementation of FTI involves additional
evaluation support from the Research Executive Agency (REA), which is equal for
both scenarios. According to the analysis the delegation to the EASME brings better
results, both in qualitative and in quantitative terms, as compared to in-house
management[16].

The human and financial
resources impact of the proposed delegation of the Fast Track to Innovation
pilot scheme to the EASME is foreseen to be met by redeployment. This entails:

3⁄4 
In terms of human resources: a modification of EASME's establishment plan, reflecting a request
for 1 additional establishment plan post (AD 7) for a seconded Commission
official, which is offset from a budgetary point of
view by 1 frozen post in the Commission’s establishment
plan, as well as a net transfer of contract agents (4 FTE) from the
Commission and the Innovation and Networks Executive Agency (INEA) to the EASME.

3⁄4 
In terms of financial resources: an overall increase in the EU contribution to the running costs of
the EASME, amounting to EUR 410 813, which is proposed to be financed by a
corresponding reduction of appropriations for staff and administrative support
expenditure in the Commission and the INEA.

3⁄4 
In terms of operational appropriations: finally,
a minor net saving resulting from the proposed
delegation of the FTI pilot scheme, amounting to EUR 1 291, is proposed to be
added to the operational expenditure of Horizon 2020, on budget item 08 02 03 01 ‘Improving lifelong health and
wellbeing’.

4.3         Agricultural
promotion measures

The delegation as from
2015 of the Agricultural promotion measures to the Consumers,
Health and Food Executive Agency (CHAFEA) was already announced in the
delegation package for the 2014-2020 programmes to executive agencies, and it
was included in the cost-benefit analysis carried out in 2013. However, due to
the late adoption of the legal basis, the budgetary impact could not be
included in the DB 2015. It is now proposed to create a new budget item (05 01
06 01 ‘Consumers, Health and Food Executive Agency 3⁄4 Contribution from
Agricultural promotion programme’) and to adjust the establishment plan of the
agency.

As previously foreseen, in
order to be fully operational as from the beginning of 2016 when the delegation
of operational appropriations is scheduled, a Commission official will be
seconded to CHAFEA in the course of 2015, in order to prepare the sound
implementation of the new programme by the agency (preparation of procedures,
structures, the first call for proposals, oversee the setting up of the IT
systems etc.). This secondment is proposed to be incorporated in the 2015
budget by adding 1 establishment plan post (AD 11)
for a seconded Commission official to CHAFEA's establishment plan, which is offset
from a budgetary point of view by
1 frozen post in the Commission’s establishment plan. The
salary related expenditure has been calculated on a six months basis, since the
post will be occupied in the course of 2015. The budget neutrality is further
ensured by adjusting the operational appropriations of the Agricultural
promotion programme by an amount of EUR 99 000, to
ensure its proper implementation.

4.4         Overall
budgetary and human resources impact

Full details of the impact of the proposed mandate extensions on
appropriations of an administrative nature and on staff of the Commission, the
INEA, the EASME and the CHAFEA are given in the budgetary annex.

The overall budgetary and human resources impact of the
supplementary delegation of implementing tasks to executive agencies as
proposed in this amending letter to the 2015 DB, notably the two additional
frozen posts in the Commission's establishment plan, should also be seen in
connection with the DB 2015 itself, in which the Commission proposed to reduce
its own number of establishment plan posts beyond the reference reduction
target of 1 % per year, by 13 additional posts, thus accelerating the
achievement of the 5 % staff reduction target over five years.

5            Transformation of posts in
establishment plans

5.1         Commission

Further to the review of
the Staff Regulations of Officials and the Conditions of Employment of Other
Servants of the European Union (hereinafter ‘Staff Regulations’)[17], which entered into force on 1 January 2014, a new
function group for Secretaries and Clerks (AST/SC) was created and reflected in
the establishment plans in the 2014 budget, in addition to the existing
function groups for Administrators (AD) and Assistants (AST).

At the time of its
creation in amending letter 2/2014[18], the Commission indicated that the new structure would be filled
progressively as from 2014, awaiting a reliable estimate of the number of
AST/SC posts required. Subsequently, in DAB 3/2014[19] the Commission proposed to adjust the establishment plans of the
Commission, the Offices, the Committee of the Regions and the European Data
Protection Supervisor, in order to allow for the transformation of a total of
94 AST posts into AST/SC posts.

In addition, in early October
2014 the Commission informed the European Parliament and the Council of its
intention to modify its establishment plan for the year 2014, in accordance
with the procedure laid down in Article 50 of the Financial Regulation[20], in order to allow for the creation of the new Commission's Cabinets,
which is planned for November 2014. Through this amending letter, the
Commission requests to modify its 2015 establishment plan accordingly, as
follows:

Establishment plan || Number of posts || Grade of origin || Grade of destination

Commission administration – temporary posts || 26 || AST 5 || AST/SC 4

Commission administration – temporary posts || 10 || AST 4 || AST/SC 4

Commission administration – temporary posts || 9 || AST 3 || AST/SC 4

Commission administration – permanent posts || 45 || AST 3 || AST/SC 4

Total Commission || 90 || AST || AST/SC

The overall savings
generated by the requested conversions are estimated at EUR 0,47 million, which
reduces the related administrative expenditure under heading 5 accordingly. The
corresponding payment appropriations become available for redeployment, whereas
the related commitment appropriations are reduced from the Commission Section
in the budget.

5.2         European Environment Agency

A technical revision of the
establishment plan of the European Environment Agency (EEA) for 2015 is requested,
in order to align the breakdown between AD and AST posts in the establishment
plan with the staff actually in place in the Agency. The total number of
establishment plan posts as requested in the draft budget 2015 remains
unchanged, and this has no budgetary implications in terms of the requested
appropriations for 2015.

5.3         European
Ombudsman

In the DB 2015 the
European Ombudsman requested a transformation of a temporary post into a
permanent post, at the level of AD 10. However, now that the Ombudsman has more
clarity as to the actual staff recruitment, it is proposed to carry out the
previously foreseen conversion of a temporary post into a permanent post at the
level of AD 7, instead of AD 10. The total number of establishment plan posts as
requested in the draft budget 2015 remains unchanged, and this has no budgetary
implications in terms of the requested appropriations for 2015.

6            Conclusion

This
amending letter No 1/2015 constitutes the Commission’s update of the 2015 draft
budget, prior to the start of the Conciliation. On this basis, the European
Parliament and the Council are expected to take the revised estimates into
account in view of their deliberations on the 2015 budget, within the deadlines
foreseen by the Treaty.

7            Summary table by heading of the multiannual financial
framework

Heading || Draft Budget 2015 || Amending Letter 1/2015 || Draft Budget 2015 (incl. AL1/2015) ||

CA || PA || CA || PA || CA || PA ||

1. || Smart and inclusive growth || 66 674 151 686 || 67 184 519 713 || 0 || 240 008 427 || 66 674 151 686 || 67 424 528 140 ||

Of  which under Flexibility Instrument || 79 785 595 || || || || 79 785 595 || ||

Ceiling || 66 813 000 000 || || || || 66 813 000 000 || ||

Margin || 218 633 909 || || || || 218 633 909 || ||

1a || Competitiveness for growth and jobs || 17 447 366 091 || 15 582 589 555 || 0 || 240 008 427 || 17 447 366 091 || 15 822 597 982 ||

Ceiling || 17 666 000 000 || || || || 17 666 000 000 || ||

Margin || 218 633 909 || || || || 218 633 909 || ||

1b || Economic, social and territorial cohesion || 49 226 785 595 || 51 601 930 158 || 0 || 0 || 49 226 785 595 || 51 601 930 158 ||

Of  which under Flexibility Instrument || 79 785 595 || || || || 79 785 595 || ||

Ceiling || 49 147 000 000 || || || || 49 147 000 000 || ||

Margin || 0 || || || || 0 || ||

2. || Sustainable growth: natural resources || 59 253 722 357 || 56 907 254 933 || -447 972 427 || -396 972 427 || 58 805 749 930 || 56 510 282 506 ||

Ceiling || 59 599 000 000 || || || || 59 599 000 000 || ||

Margin || 345 277 643 || || || || 793 250 070 || ||

Of which: European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) — Market related expenditure and direct payments || 43 903 753 189 || 43 896 984 216 || -447 972 427 || -447 972 427 || 43 455 780 762 || 43 449 011 789 ||

Sub-ceiling || 44 313 000 000 || || || || 44 313 000 000 || ||

Net transfer between EAGF and EAFRD || 123 215 000 || || || || 123 215 000 || ||

Margin || 286 031 811 || || || || 734 004 238 || ||

3. || Security and citizenship || 2 130 721 538 || 1 881 169 907 || 0 || 5 500 000 || 2 130 721 538 || 1 886 669 907 ||

Ceiling || 2 246 000 000 || || || || 2 246 000 000 || ||

Margin || 115 278 462 || || || || 115 278 462 || ||

4. || Global Europe || 8 413 097 321 || 7 326 986 134 || 0 || 152 000 000 || 8 413 097 321 || 7 478 986 134 ||

Ceiling || 8 749 000 000 || || || || 8 749 000 000 || ||

Margin || 335 902 679 || || || || 335 902 679 || ||

5. || Administration || 8 612 224 908 || 8 612 384 908 || -536 000 || -536 000 || 8 611 688 908 || 8 611 848 908 ||

Ceiling || 9 076 000 000 || || || || 9 076 000 000 || ||

Margin || 463 775 092 || || || || 464 311 092 || ||

Of which: Administrative expenditure of the institutions || 6 893 144 508 || 6 893 304 508 || 0 || 0 || 6 893 399 508 || 6 893 559 508 ||

Sub-ceiling || 7 351 000 000 || || || || 7 351 000 000 || ||

Margin || 457 855 492 || || || || 457 600 492 || ||

6. || Compensations || p.m. || p.m. || 0 || 0 || p.m. || p.m. ||

Ceiling || 0 || || || || 0 || ||

Margin || 0 || || || || 0 || ||

Total || 145 083 917 810 || 141 912 315 595 || -448 508 427 || 0 || 144 635 409 383 || 141 912 315 595 ||

Of which under Flexibility Instrument || 79 785 595 || 11 315 595 || || || 79 785 595 || 11 315 595 ||

Ceiling || 146 483 000 000 || 141 901 000 000 || || || 146 483 000 000 || 141 901 000 000 ||

Margin || 1 478 867 785 || 0 || || || 1 927 376 212 || 0 ||

|| Special Instruments || 515 365 000 || 225 000 000 || 0 || 0 || 515 365 000 || 225 000 000 ||

Grand Total || 145 599 282 810 || 142 137 315 595 || -448 508 427 || 0 || 145 150 774 383 || 142 137 315 595 ||

[1]               OJ L
298, 26.10.2012, p. 1.

[2]               COM(2014)
300.

[3]               Under the 2014-2020 MFF, the initial EAGF sub-ceiling
for 2015 amounts to EUR 44 368 million. After taking into account a net amount
of EUR 178,2 million to be transferred to Rural Development that had already
been incorporated in the DB 2015, the net amount available for the EAGF (‘net
sub-ceiling’) amounts to EUR 44 189,8 million. The EAGF needs for 2015 are
assessed against this EAGF ‘net sub-ceiling’.

[4]               OJ C 373, 20.12.2013.

[5]               Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 913/2014 of
21 August 2014, Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 932/2014 of 29 August
2014 and Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 1031/2014 of 29 September 
2014.

[6]               Commission Implementing Regulations (EU) No 947/2014
of 4 September 2014 and No 948/2014 of 4 September 2014, Commission
Delegated Regulations (EU) No 949/2014 of 4 September 2014 and No 950/2014 of 4
September 2014.

[7]               The exact amount is EUR 874 651 513 and includes EUR
424,5 million from the agricultural crisis reserve 2014, which will eventually
not be called on as the financial consequences of the temporary crisis measures
taken in the second half of 2014 will exclusively impact on the 2015 budget. It
will be carried over from the 2014 budget into the 2015 budget on budget
article 05 03 09, which is proposed to be created for 2014 in DAB 4/2014, in
line with the DB 2015 nomenclature. The reimbursement to farmers will take
place at the very beginning of the year 2015, together with the first payments
of direct aids under the 2015 budget.

[8]               The rate of financial discipline is established in Commission
Implementing Regulation (EU) No 879/2014 of 12 August 2014 fixing an
adjustment rate to direct payments provided for in Regulation (EC) No 73/2009 in
respect of calendar year 2014. AL 1/2015 slightly modifies this rate due to the
impact of the amounts allocated to the different direct aid schemes.

[9]                      Regulation (EU) No 228/2013 of the European Parliament and of the
Council of 13 March 2013 laying down specific measures for agriculture in the
outermost regions of the Union and repealing Council Regulation (EC) No
247/2006.

[10]             Commission Implementing
Regulation (EU) No 1071/2014 of 10 October 2014.

[11]             Appropriations after financial discipline.

[12]             Appropriations after financial discipline.

[13]             After financial discipline.

[14]             COM(2013) 719, 16.10.2013.

[15]             Regulation
(EC) No 58/2003 of 19 December 2002 laying down the statute for executive
agencies to be      entrusted with certain tasks in the management of Community
programmes (OJ L 11, 16.1.2003, p. 1).

[16]             Full details on the methodology and the underlying
assumptions are provided in the cost-benefit analysis.

[17]             OJ L 287, 29.10.2013.

[18]             COM(2013) 719, 16.10.2013.

[19]             COM(2014) 329, 28.5.2014.

[20]             OJ L 298,
26.10.2012, p. 1.