alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32

Via EDGAR

Securities and Exchange Commission

100F Street, N.E.

Washington, D.C. 20549

Re: Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Ladies and Gentlemen:

In connection with the Annual Report of Whiting USA Trust II (the “Trust”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, not in its individual capacity but solely as the trustee of the Trust, certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to its knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.

The above certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-K or as a separate disclosure document.

| ﻿

						 

						  |   |                                                                                     |
|--------------------------------------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| ﻿                             |   | Whiting USA Trust II                                                      |
| ﻿                             |   |                                                                                     |
| ﻿                             | By:    | The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., |
| ﻿                             |   | as Trustee                                                                          |
| ﻿                             |   |                                                                                     |
| ﻿                             | By:    | /s/ Mike Ulrich                                                                     |
| ﻿                             |   | Mike Ulrich                                                                              |
| ﻿                             |   | Vice President                                                                      |
| ﻿                             |   |                                                                                     |

Date: March 10, 2017

﻿

﻿

----
### §12010. Computations for Navy Reserve and Marine Corps Reserve: rule when fraction occurs in final result

When there is a fraction in the final result of any computation under this chapter for the Navy Reserve or the Marine Corps Reserve, a fraction of one-half or more is counted as one, and a fraction of less than one-half is disregarded.

(Added Pub. L. 103–337, div. A, title XVI, §1662(a)(1), Oct. 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 2987; amended Pub. L. 109–163, div. A, title V, §515(b)(1)(GG), (3)(I), Jan. 6, 2006, 119 Stat. 3233, 3234.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

Provisions similar to those in this section were contained in section 5454 of this title, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 103–337, §1662(a)(3).

#### Amendments

2006—Pub. L. 109–163, §515(b)(3)(I), substituted "Navy Reserve" for "Naval Reserve" in section catchline.

Pub. L. 109–163, §515(b)(1)(GG), substituted "Navy Reserve" for "Naval Reserve" in text.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Dec. 1, 1994, except as otherwise provided, see section 1691 of Pub. L. 103–337, set out as a note under section 10001 of this title.
H. Res. 277

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

August 5, 1999.

Resolved, That the following named Member be, and is

hereby, elected to the following standing committees of the

House of Representatives:

COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS: Mr. Forbes of New

York, to rank immediately after Mr. Price of North Carolina.

COMMITTEE ON BANKING AND FINANCIAL SERVICES:

Mr. Forbes of New York.

Attest:

Clerk.
§ 169.3 To what land does this part apply? ( a ) This part applies to Indian land and BIA land.
( b ) We will not take any action on a right-of-way across fee land or collect compensation on behalf of fee interest owners. We will not condition our grant of a right-of-way across Indian land or BIA land on the applicant having obtained a right-of-way from the owners of any fee interests. The applicant will be responsible for negotiating directly with and making any payments directly to the owners of any fee interests that may exist in the property on which the right-of-way is granted.
( c ) We will not include the fee interests in a tract in calculating the applicable percentage of interests required for consent to a right-of-way.
### §813. Art. 13. Punishment prohibited before trial

No person, while being held for trial, may be subjected to punishment or penalty other than arrest or confinement upon the charges pending against him, nor shall the arrest or confinement imposed upon him be any more rigorous than the circumstances require to insure his presence, but he may be subjected to minor punishment during that period for infractions of discipline.

(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 41; Pub. L. 97–81, §3, Nov. 20, 1981, 95 Stat. 1087.)

| Revised section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 813 | 50:567. | May 5, 1950, ch. 169, §1 (Art. 13), 64 Stat. 112. |

The words "the provisions of" are omitted as surplusage. The word "results" is changed to the singular. The word "may" is substituted for the word "shall".

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1981—Pub. L. 97–81 substituted "No person, while being held for trial, may be subjected" for "Subject to section 857 of this title (article 57), no person, while being held for trial or the result of trial, may be subjected".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1981 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 97–81 to take effect at the end of the 60-day period beginning on Nov. 20, 1981, and to apply to each person held as the result of a court-martial sentence announced on or after that date, see section 7(a) and (b)(2) of Pub. L. 97–81, set out as an Effective Date note under section 706 of this title.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Exit counseling guide forborrowers of direct loans and Federal Family Education Program loans.**
 
2014: AprilSeptember | 2015 | 2017
 
SuDoc:ED1.8:C 83/22/
Item Number:0461-B-01 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000966763
 
December 1, 2017
#### In the Matter of the Application of William C. Duell for a Peremptory Writ of Mandamus against Martin H. Glynn, as Comptroller of the State of New York.

Motion granted, and question certified as follows: The surrogate of Westchester county having recommended a qualified person for appointment under the provisions of section 334 of the Tax Law,* as amended by chapter 368 of the Laws o£ 1905, as transfer tax assistant in his office, may the Comptroller appoint another qualified person, who has not been recommended by the surrogate?†

*

 Laws of 1896, chap. 908.—[Rep.

†

*See Matter of Duell*v. *Glynn*(122 App. Div. 314).— [Rep.
#### In the Matter of Gina L., Respondent, v David W., Appellant.

[826 NYS2d 338]

In a paternity proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 5, the putative father appeals from an order of the Family Court, *811Richmond County (Porzio, J.), dated September 27, 2005, which, after a hearing, denied his motion to vacate an order of filiation of the same court (Panepinto, H.E.), dated June 15, 1993.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The Family Court properly denied the putative father’s motion to vacate the order of filiation. The putative father claimed that the order should be vacated, as a paternity test revealed that he was not the biological father of the subject child. The doctrine of equitable estoppel may be applied to preclude a parent from challenging an order of filiation. It is the child’s best interests which are of paramount concern *(see Matter of Griffin v*Marshall, 294 AD2d 438 [2002]; *Matter of Louise P. v Thomas R.,*223 AD2d 592 [1996]; *Matter of Barbara A.M. v Gerard J.M.,*178 AD2d 412 [1991]). Where a child justifiably relies on the representations of a man that he is his or her father with the result that the child will be harmed by the man’s denial of paternity, the man may be estopped from asserting that denial *(see Matter of Shondel J. v Mark D.,*7 NY3d 320, 327 [2006]).

Because the child is the party in whose favor estoppel was applied, the equities between the two adults are not involved here. The case turns exclusively on the best interests of the child. There can be no claim that the child was guilty of fraud or misrepresentation *(id.*at 330-331).

The child’s testimony, which was credited by the Family Court, demonstrates that she relied on the putative father’s representations by accepting him as her father and treating him as such. The Family Court properly found that it would not be in her best interests to now allow the putative father to renounce paternity *(id.*at 328). Adams, J.E, Ritter, Lunn and Covello, JJ, concur.
#### § 162.525 Must a lessee provide a performance bond for a WEEL?

We will not require the lessee to provide a performance bond or alternative form of security for a WEEL.
#### In the Matter of the Examination of the Witnesses Within the State of New York, in an Action in the New Jersey Supreme Court, Wherein Butterworth-Judson Company, a Corporation, etc., Is Plaintiff, and Central Railroad Company of New Jersey, a Corporation, etc., Is Defendant. George O. Waterman and Others, Appellants; Butterworth-Judson Company, Respondent.

—Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs, and disbursements. Mo opinion.
### Marine evaporites

By: F.H. Stewart

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/pp440Y

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plate:  **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
Exhibit 31.1 

CERTIFICATION 

I, John Meier, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of QuadTechInternational, Inc. for the quarter ended January 31, 2007; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements weremade, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this annual report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of thesmall business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the smallbusiness issuer and have: 

(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the small business issuer is madeknown to us by others, particularly during the period in which this annualreport is being prepared; 

(b) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosurecontrols and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered bythis report based on such evaluation; and 

(c) disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer'sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during the smallbusiness issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, oris reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internalcontrol over financial reporting; and 

5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the auditcommittee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions); 

(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and 

(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internalcontrol over financial reporting. 

March 19, 2007 

 

|  

 /s/ John Meier
*John Meier

President and Chief Executive    Officer*
  |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Exhibit 33.5

 

[LETTERHEAD OF CORELOGIC COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE SERVICES,INC.]

 

 

REPORTONASSESSMENTOFCOMPLIANCE

 

CoreLogicCommercialRealEstateServices,Inc.(the“AssertingParty”),anindirect subsidiaryofCoreLogic,Inc,isresponsibleforassessing compliance as ofDecember31, 2011, and for the period from January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2011 (the “Reporting Period”) with the servicingcriteria set forth in Title 17, Sections 229.1122(d)(1)(iv), (d)(2)(v), (d)(2)(vi),(d)(2)(vii),(d)(4)(xi), (d)(4)(xii) and(d)(4)(xiii) of the Code of Federal Regulationsapplicable to the Asserting Party (the “Applicable Servicing Criteria”).The servicing activities covered by this reportincludeall loansfor commercial mortgage loanoutsourcingcustomers forwhich the AssertingPartyserved as thecommercialtax serviceprovider (the “Platform”).

 

The Asserting Partyhas assessed itscompliancewiththe Applicable ServicingCriteria for the Reporting Period and hasconcluded thatthe Asserting Partyhascomplied, in all materialrespects, with the Applicable ServicingCriteria as of December31, 2011, and for the ReportingPeriodwith respectto thePlatform takenas a whole.

 

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP,an independent registeredpublicaccountingfirm, has issued an attestationreport ontheassessmentof compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria asofDecember31,2011, and forthe Reporting Period.

 

 

CORELOGIC COMMERCIALREAL ESTATE SERVICES, INC.

 

 

/s/ Vicki Chenault

_________________________________

Vicki Chenault,

SeniorVicePresident

February 8, 2012

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Page 1 of 1
### §20602. Officers: computation of years of service for voluntary retirement

(a) Years of Active Service.—For the purpose of determining whether an officer of the Space Force may be retired under section 20601 of this title, the officer's years of service are computed by adding all active service in the armed forces.

(b) Reference to Section Excluding Service During Certain Periods.—Section 972(b) of this title excludes from computation of an officer's years of service for purposes of this section any time identified with respect to that officer under that section.

(Added Pub. L. 118–31, div. A, title XVII, §1719A(a), Dec. 22, 2023, 137 Stat. 663.)
#### § 2.209 Who may file a response to the statement of reasons?

Any interested party may file a response to the statement of reasons, thereby becoming a participant. The decision-maker may also file a response to the statement of reasons.
#### Robert Hunt, Appellant, v. Jacob Racich, as Guardian ad Litem of Vincent Muessman, an Infant, Respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. No opinion.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

# JBER Service Members Host National Native American Heritage Month  Celebration

By Sgt. Brian Ragin4th Brigade Combat Team, 25th Infantry Division Public Affairs

                JOINT BASE ELEMENDORF-RICHARDSON, Alaska  –              

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

National Native American Heritage Month

pacom

news

articles
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 129 Agreed to House (ATH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 129

 Extending the Select Committee on U.S. National Security and Military/
        Commercial Concerns With the People's Republic of China.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 24, 1999

Mr. Cox (for himself and Mr. Dicks) submitted the following resolution; 
              which was referred to the Committee on Rules

                             March 24, 1999

      The Committee on Rules discharged; considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Extending the Select Committee on U.S. National Security and Military/
        Commercial Concerns With the People's Republic of China.

    Resolved,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF SELECT COMMITTEE.

    Section 2(f)(1) of House Resolution 5, One Hundred Sixth Congress, 
agreed to January 6, 1999, is amended by striking ``April 1, 1999'' and 
inserting ``April 30, 1999 (or, if earlier, the date on which the 
Select Committee completes its activities)''.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 36 (Wednesday, February 23, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 10088]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-3901]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Office of Thrift Supervision

[AC-60: OTS Nos. H-4757, H-4519, and 17971]

Sunshine Financial, Inc., Tallahassee Florida; Approval of 
Conversion Application

    Notice is hereby given that on February 11, 2011, the Office of 
Thrift Supervision approved the application of Sunshine Savings MHC, 
Tallahassee, Florida, the federal mutual holding company for Sunshine 
Savings Bank, Tallahassee, Florida, to convert to the stock form of 
organization. Copies of the application are available for inspection by 
appointment (phone number: 202-906-5922 or e-mail 
[email protected]) at the Public Reading Room, 1700 G Street, 
NW., Washington, DC 20552, and the OTS Southeast Regional Office, 1475 
Peachtree Street, NE., Atlanta, GA 30309.

    Dated: February 15, 2011.

    By the Office of Thrift Supervision.
Sandra E. Evans,
Federal Register Liaison.
[FR Doc. 2011-3901 Filed 2-22-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6720-01-M
```
#### § 2.200 Who may appeal a decision?

You have a right to appeal a decision made by an Indian Affairs official if you can show, through credible statements, that you are adversely affected by the decision.
```

                                  Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the quarterly filing of Meier Worldwide Intermedia Inc., a
Nevada corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-QSB for the period ended April
30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"),
I, James Meier, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.ss.1350), that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

June 19, 2003

By:/s/ James Meier
   James Meier, President, CEO and Chief Accounting Officer
```
#### George A. Bergmann, Respondent, v. Franklin B. Lord and Henry S. Van Duzer, as Substituted Trustees under the Will of George Cabot Ward, Deceased Impleaded with Frances L. B. Leavitt, Formerly Frances L. B. Ward, Individually and as Executrix, etc., of Samuel G. Ward, Jr., Deceased, and Marian Low, Appellants.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. No opinion. (Ingraham and McLaughlin, JJ., dissenting on dissenting opinion in *Bergmann*v. *Leavitt,*113 App. Div. 899.)