alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### Ore deposits of the Kokomo-Tenmile District, Colorado

By: M.H. BergendahlAlbert Herbert Koschmann

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/pp652

#### Links

- More information:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**                            (html)
-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (11032 pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (6281 pdf)                        
  - **Plate 2**                            (3773 pdf) 
- Superseded Publications:
                                        Topographic and geologic map of the Kokomo-Robinson area, Summit County, Colorado(1942)                                    

                                        Geologic map of the Kokomo mining district, Colorado(1944)                                    

                                        Preliminary report on Kokomo mining district, Colorado(1945)                                    

                                        Map of the Kokomo (Tenmile) zinc-lead mining district, Colorado(1948)                                    

- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 2 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                       January 6, 1999.
    Resolved, That the Senate be informed that a quorum of the House of 
Representatives has assembled; that J. Dennis Hastert, a Representative from the 
State of Illinois, has been elected Speaker; and Jeffrey J. Trandahl, a citizen 
of the Commonwealth of Virginia, has been elected Clerk of the House of 
Representatives of the One Hundred Sixth Congress.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
#### § 15.2 Information services.

The Director of the Federal Register shall provide for the answering of each appropriate inquiry presented in person, by telephone, or in writing. Each written communication and each matter involving the Administrative Committee shall be sent to the Director, Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration, Washington, DC 20408.

[50 FR 12468, Mar. 28, 1985]
# C_2013319EN.01000301.xml

| 5.11.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 319/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.11.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 319/3

---

Communication from the Commission relating to the overall allocation of certain quotas opened by the European Union for products in the rice sector in 2013

2013/C 319/05

Commission Regulation (EU) No 1274/2009 (1) opened tariff quotas for the import of rice originating in the overseas countries and territories (OCT).

1

The overall allocation for 2013 of each quota provided for by that Regulation is set out in the Annex to this communication.

---

(1)  OJ L 344, 23.12.2009, p. 3.

1

---

ANNEX

Overall allocation for 2013 of the quotas under Regulation (EU) No 1274/2009

| Origin | Order number | Import licence applications introduced for the September 2013 subperiod | Overall allocation of the quota for 2013 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Netherlands Antilles and Aruba | 09.4189 | (1) | 0 % |
| Least developed OCTs | 09.4190 | (1) | 0 % |

Origin

Order number

Import licence applications introduced for the September 2013 subperiod

Overall allocation of the quota for 2013

Netherlands Antilles and Aruba

09.4189

(1)

0 %

Least developed OCTs

09.4190

(1)

0 %

---

(1)  No allocation coefficient for this subperiod: no licence applications were sent to the Commission.

---
#### § 134.7 Modifications.

The act of July 1, 1932 (47 Stat. 564; 25 U.S.C. 386a), cancelled all irrigation assessments for construction costs against lands in Indian ownership which were unpaid at that date and deferred all future assessments for construction costs until the Indian title to the land shall have been extinguished.
### §4983. Administration

(a) Agreements Required.—The Secretary of Defense may enter into one or more agreements, each with an appropriate Federal or private entity, under which such entity may, under this subchapter—

(1) process applications for loan guarantees;

(2) administer repayment of loans; and

(3) provide any other services to the Secretary to administer this subchapter.

(b) Treatment of Costs.—The costs of such agreements shall be considered, for purposes of the special account established under section 4982(c), to be costs of administrative expenses of the Department of Defense that are attributable to the loan guarantee program under this subchapter.

(Added Pub. L. 106–398, §1 [[div. A], title X, §1033(a)(1)], Oct. 30, 2000, 114 Stat. 1654, 1654A–259, §2541b; renumbered §4983 and amended Pub. L. 116–283, div. A, title XVIII, §1873(b), (c)(2), (e)(2), Jan. 1, 2021, 134 Stat. 4290.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2021—Pub. L. 116–283, §1873(b), (c)(2), renumbered section 2541b of this title as this section.

Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 116–283, §1873(e)(2), substituted "section 4982(c)" for "section 2541a(c)".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2021 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 116–283 effective Jan. 1, 2022, with additional provisions for delayed implementation and applicability of existing law, see section 1801(d) of Pub. L. 116–283, set out as a note preceding section 3001 of this title.
# C_2014465EN.01000101.xml

| 24.12.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 465/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.12.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 465/1

---

RECOMMENDATION OF THE EUROPEAN CENTRAL BANK

of 16 December 2014

to the Council of the European Union on the external auditors of Lietuvos bankas

(ECB/2014/58)

(2014/C 465/01)

THE GOVERNING COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN CENTRAL BANK,

Having regard to the Statute of the European System of Central Banks and of the European Central Bank, and in particular Article 27.1 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | The accounts of the European Central Bank (ECB) and national central banks of the Member States whose currency is the euro are audited by independent external auditors recommended by the ECB’s Governing Council and approved by the Council of the European Union. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

The accounts of the European Central Bank (ECB) and national central banks of the Member States whose currency is the euro are audited by independent external auditors recommended by the ECB’s Governing Council and approved by the Council of the European Union.

| (2) | Pursuant to Article 1 of Council Decision 2014/509/EU (1) Lithuania fulfils the necessary conditions for the adoption of the euro, and the derogation in favour of Lithuania referred to in Article 4 of the 2003 Act of Accession (2) is abrogated with effect from 1 January 2015. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Pursuant to Article 1 of Council Decision 2014/509/EU (1) Lithuania fulfils the necessary conditions for the adoption of the euro, and the derogation in favour of Lithuania referred to in Article 4 of the 2003 Act of Accession (2) is abrogated with effect from 1 January 2015.

1

2

| (3) | Pursuant to Article 50 of the Law on Lietuvos bankas, from 1 January 2015 the annual financial statements of Lietuvos bankas will be audited by independent external auditors recommended by the ECB’s Governing Council and approved by the Council. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Pursuant to Article 50 of the Law on Lietuvos bankas, from 1 January 2015 the annual financial statements of Lietuvos bankas will be audited by independent external auditors recommended by the ECB’s Governing Council and approved by the Council.

| (4) | Lietuvos bankas has selected UAB ‘PricewaterhouseCoopers’ as its external auditors for the financial years 2015 to 2017, |
| --- | --- |

(4)

Lietuvos bankas has selected UAB ‘PricewaterhouseCoopers’ as its external auditors for the financial years 2015 to 2017,

HAS ADOPTED THIS RECOMMENDATION:

It is recommended that UAB ‘PricewaterhouseCoopers’ should be appointed as the external auditors of Lietuvos bankas for the financial years 2015 to 2017.

Done at Frankfurt am Main, 16 December 2014.

The President of the ECB

Mario DRAGHI

---

(1)  Council Decision 2014/509/EU of 23 July 2014 on the adoption by Lithuania of the euro on 1 January 2015 (OJ L 228, 31.7.2014, p. 29).

1

(2)  OJ L 236, 23.9.2003, p. 33.

2

---
### §1610. Reductions and other adjustments in force

(a) In General.—The Secretary of Defense shall prescribe regulations for the separation of employees in defense intelligence positions, including members of the Defense Intelligence Senior Executive Service and employees in Intelligence Senior Level positions, during a reduction in force or other adjustment in force. The regulations shall apply to such a reduction in force or other adjustment in force notwithstanding sections 3501(b) and 3502 of title 5.

(b) Matters To Be Given Effect.—The regulations shall give effect to the following:

(1) Tenure of employment.

(2) Military preference, subject to sections 3501(a)(3) and 3502(b) of title 5.

(3) The veteran's preference under section 3502(b) of title 5.

(4) Performance.

(5) Length of service computed in accordance with the second sentence of section 3502(a) of title 5.

(c) Regulations Relating to Defense Intelligence SES.—The regulations relating to removal from the Defense Intelligence Senior Executive Service in a reduction in force or other adjustment in force shall be consistent with section 3595(a) of title 5.

(d) Right of Appeal.—(1) The regulations shall provide a right of appeal regarding a personnel action under the regulations. The appeal shall be determined within the Department of Defense. An appeal determined at the highest level provided in the regulations shall be final and not subject to review outside the Department of Defense. A personnel action covered by the regulations is not subject to any other provision of law that provides appellate rights or procedures.

(2) Notwithstanding paragraph (1), a preference eligible referred to in section 7511(a)(1)(B) of title 5 may elect to have an appeal of a personnel action taken against the preference eligible under the regulation determined by the Merit Systems Protection Board instead of having the appeal determined within the Department of Defense. Section 7701 of title 5 shall apply to any such appeal to the Merit Systems Protection Board.

(e) Consultation With OPM.—Regulations under this section shall be prescribed in consultation with the Director of the Office of Personnel Management.

(Added Pub. L. 104–201, div. A, title XVI, §1632(b), Sept. 23, 1996, 110 Stat. 2749.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Oct. 1, 1996, see section 1635 of Pub. L. 104–201, set out as an Effective Date of 1996 Amendment note under section 1593 of this title.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 99-20190 

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

MICHAEL D. BROWN,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. H-92-CR-ALL

--------------------

December 16, 1999

Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

The Assistant Federal Public Defenders appointed to

represent Michael Dejean Brown have filed a motion to withdraw

from representation of Brown and a brief as required by Anders v.

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Brown has responded to

counsel’s motion. Our independent review of the brief, the

record, and Brown’s response discloses no nonfrivolous issue. 

Accordingly, Brown’s court-appointed attorneys’ motion to
No. 99-20190

-2-

withdraw is GRANTED; the attorneys are excused from further

responsibilities herein and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR.

R. 42.2.
# C_2017285EN.01039601.xml

| 29.8.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 285/396 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.8.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 285/396

---

P7_TA(2014)0144

EU-Turkey agreement on the readmission of persons residing without authorisation ***

European Parliament legislative resolution of 26 February 2014 on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of the Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Turkey on the readmission of persons residing without authorisation (10697/2012 — C7-0029/2014 — 2012/0122(NLE))

(Consent)

(2017/C 285/51)

The European Parliament,

The European Parliament

| — | having regard to the draft Council decision (10697/2012), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the draft Council decision (10697/2012),

| — | having regard to the draft Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Turkey on the readmission of persons residing without authorisation (10693/2012), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the draft Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Turkey on the readmission of persons residing without authorisation (10693/2012),

| — | having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Article 79(3) and Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (a)(v), of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C7-0029/2014), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Article 79(3) and Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (a)(v), of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C7-0029/2014),

| — | having regard to Rules 81 and 90(7) of its Rules of Procedure, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Rules 81 and 90(7) of its Rules of Procedure,

| — | having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs and the opinion of the Committee on Foreign Affairs (A7-0097/2014), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs and the opinion of the Committee on Foreign Affairs (A7-0097/2014),

| 1. | Consents to the conclusion of the Agreement; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Consents to the conclusion of the Agreement;

| 2. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States and of the Republic of Turkey. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States and of the Republic of Turkey.

---
An official website of the United States government                

----

end of header

Interactive tool does not support Internet Explorer.

	Application Loading

CONNECT WITH US**********

                          - Information Quality
                          - Data Linkage Infrastructure
                          - Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                          - Accessibility
                          - FOIA
                          - Inspector General
                          - No FEAR Act
                          - U.S. Department of Commerce
                          - USA.gov

----

Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy

Is this page helpful?
YesNo

NO THANKS

255 characters maximum255 characters maximum reached

Thank you for your feedback.Comments or suggestions?
H. Res. 290 

In the House of Representatives, U.S., 

September 15, 1999. 

Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule 

XVIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee of the 

Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of 

the bill (H.R. 1551) to authorize the Federal Aviation Administration’s civil aviation research and development programs for fiscal years 2000 and 2001, and for other purposes. The first reading of the bill shall be dispensed with. 

General debate shall be confined to the bill and shall not exceed one hour equally divided and controlled by the chairman 

and ranking minority member of the Committee on Science. 

After general debate the bill shall be considered for amendment under the five-minute rule. It shall be in order to consider as an original bill for purpose of amendment under the 

five-minute rule the amendment in the nature of a substitute 

recommended by the Committee on Science now printed in 

the bill. Each section of the committee amendment in the nature of a substitute shall be considered as read. During conVerDate Aug 31 2005 11:26 May 08, 2006 Jkt 049200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6300 E:\PICKUP\HR290.EH HR290

erjones on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 290 EH 

sideration of the bill for amendment, the Chairman of the 

Committee of the Whole may accord priority in recognition 

on the basis of whether the Member offering an amendment 

has caused it to be printed in the portion of the Congressional Record designated for that purpose in clause 8 of rule 

XVIII. Amendments so printed shall be considered as read. 

The Chairman of the Committee of the Whole may: (1) postpone until a time during further consideration in the Committee of the Whole a request for a recorded vote on any 

amendment; and (2) reduce to five minutes the minimum 

time for electronic voting on any postponed question that follows another electronic vote without intervening business, 

provided that the minimum time for electronic voting on the 

first in any series of questions shall be 15 minutes. At the 

conclusion of consideration of the bill for amendment the 

Committee shall rise and report the bill to the House with 

such amendments as may have been adopted. Any Member 

may demand a separate vote in the House on any amendment 

adopted in the Committee of the Whole to the bill or to the 

committee amendment in the nature of a substitute. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill and 

amendments thereto to final passage without intervening moVerDate Aug 31 2005 11:26 May 08, 2006 Jkt 049200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6300 E:\PICKUP\HR290.EH HR290

erjones on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
3 

•HRES 290 EH 

tion except one motion to recommit with or without instructions. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 


erjones on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Somsak Chivavibul,
certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period
covered by this report on Form 10-K of SLM Student Loan Trust 2012-2 (the Exchange Act periodic reports);

2. Based on my
knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing
and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as
disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer and administrator have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreement and administration agreement, as applicable, in all material respects; and

5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on
assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this
report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K. In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by the following unaffiliated party: Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, as indenture trustee.

Date: March 31, 2015



|                                                                     
|---------------------------------------------------------------------
|/S/ SOMSAK CHIVAVIBUL                                                
|Somsak Chivavibul                                                    
|President and Chief Financial Officer (Senior Securitization Officer)
|Navient Funding, LLC
### §1508. Judicial review

(a) Right of Review.—A person who is the primary next of kin (or the previously designated person) of a person who is the subject of a finding described in subsection (b) may obtain judicial review in a United States district court of that finding, but only on the basis of a claim that there is information that could affect the status of the missing person's case that was not adequately considered during the administrative review process under this chapter. Any such review shall be as provided in section 706 of title 5.

(b) Findings for Which Judicial Review May Be Sought.—Subsection (a) applies to the following findings:

(1) A finding by a board appointed under section 1504 or 1505 of this title that a missing person is dead.

(2) A finding by a board appointed under section 1509 of this title that confirms that a missing person formerly declared dead is in fact dead.

(c) Subsequent Review.—Appeals from a decision of the district court shall be taken to the appropriate United States court of appeals and to the Supreme Court as provided by law.

(Added Pub. L. 104–106, div. A, title V, §569(b)(1), Feb. 10, 1996, 110 Stat. 348.)
#### § 212.25 Acreage limitation.

The provisions of § 211.25 of this subchapter are applicable to leases under this part.