alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

# RED HORSE joins Navy, local Guam Engineers for Concrete Course

By Tech. Sgt. Zachary Wilson36th Wing Public Affairs

                ANDERSEN AIR FORCE BASE, Guam  –              

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

RED HORSE joins Navy

PACOM News

articles
MEETING SUMMARY

Tuesday, March 30, 2010

4:30-5:30 PM

EPA West, Room 3146

Purpose:

The Center for Health, Environment and Justice requested a meeting with OSWER's Assistant

Administrator Mathy Stanislaus to discuss the Draft Interim Recommended Preliminary 

Remediation Goals for Dioxin in Soil at CERLCA and RCRA 

Attendees:

Lois M. Gibbs, Center for Health, Environment and Justice (CHEJ)

Steve Lester, CHEJ

Michelle H. Riddick, Lone Tree Council, Bay City, MI (by phone)

Dick Clapp, Boston University, School of Public Health (by phone) 

Mathy Stanislaus, EPA, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response (OSWER)

Lisa Feldt, EPA, OSWER 

Bill Sette, EPA, OSWER

Stiven Foster, EPA, OSWER

Barnes Johnson, EPA, OSWER

In Absentia:

Margaret Williams, Citizens Against Toxic Exposure, Pensacola, FL 

AGENDA

1) LM Gibbs – CHEJs’ overall views on the proposed dioxin PRGs

2) D. Clapp – dioxin carcinogenicity

3) S. Lester – state dioxin standards, technical issues related to PRG development

4) M. Riddick – community dioxin experiences in Michigan

5) M. Williams (as presented by L. Gibbs) – community dioxin experiences in Florida

6) Open Discussion

a. Children’s exposure and risk

b. Changing land use: commercial vs residential standards

c. Uptake and dietary exposures

d. Tribal experiences

e. Fish advisories

f. Community Engagement Initiative

g. Transmittal of comments and background materials
Exhibit 32.1 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of QuadTech International, Inc. (the"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended April 30, 2007 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, JohnMeier, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to QuadTech International, Inc. and will be retained by QuadTechInternational,, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission orits staff upon request. 

|  
 
*June 14, 2007*
 
*"*Signed J Meier"**John Meier

President and Chief Executive Officer*
 

 
 * |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
#### § 168.15 Control of livestock diseases and parasites.

Whenever livestock within the Hopi Partitioned Lands become infected with contagious or infectious diseases or parasites or have been exposed thereto, such livestock must be treated and the movement thereof restricted in accordance with applicable laws.
Exhibit 10.1
​
CERTAIN CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS DOCUMENT, MARKED BY [***], HAS BEEN OMITTED BECAUSE IT IS NOT MATERIAL AND IS THE TYPE THAT THE COMPANY TREATS AS PRIVATE OR CONFIDENTIAL.
​
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
​
and
​
Sigilon Therapeutics, Inc.
​
FIFTH AMENDMENT
​
This Fifth Amendment (“Fifth Amendment”), effective as of September 17, 2021 (the “Fifth Amendment Effective Date”), is made by and between the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, a nonprofit research institution having a principal address at 77 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, MA 02139 (“MIT”) and Sigilon Therapeutics, Inc. (fka Sigilon, Inc.) a Delaware corporation, having a principal address at 100 Binney Street, Cambridge, MA 02142 (“Company”) (each individually a “Party” and collectively the “Parties”), and amends that certain Exclusive Patent License Agreement between the Parties dated as of February 8, 2016, as amended (collectively, the “License Agreement”). Capitalized terms used herein without definition shall have the meaning given such terms in the License Agreement.
WHEREAS, MIT internally moved certain filings under MIT Case No. [***] to MIT Case No. [***] solely for administrative purposes;
WHEREAS, COMPANY notified MIT, in an electronic mail message dated April 21, 2020, of its desire to cease funding the prosecution of MIT Case No. [***];
NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties agree to amend the LICENSE AGREEMENT as follows:
​
1.Article 1.29 is hereby deleted and replaced with the follow definition:
​
“1.29 “GROUP A PATENT RIGHTS” shall mean any PATENT RIGHTS based on MIT Case Nos. [***].”
​



2.The Parties hereby acknowledge and agree that the following PATENT RIGHTS granted to COMPANY and its AFFILIATES associated with MIT Case No. [***] terminated on June 20, 2020 shall be removed from Appendix A of the LICENSE AGREEMENT:
MIT Case No. [***]
​
​
3.The License Agreement is hereby amended to delete Section 1.30, GROUP B PATENT RIGHTS, and Section 3.3, Diligence Requirements for the GROUP B PATENT RIGHTS.
​
​
4.Except as specifically amended herein, the terms and conditions of the LICENSE AGREEMENT shall remain in full force and effect.
​
​
{SIGNATURES TO FOLLOW}
​



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Fifth Amendment to be executed by their duly authorized representatives.
​
MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OFSIGILON THERAPEUTICS, INC.
TECHNOLOGY
​
By:/s/Lesley Millar Nicolson​ ​​ ​​ ​By:/s/Matthew Kowalsky​ ​​ ​​ ​
Name: Lesley Millar-Nicolson​ ​​ ​Name: Matthew Kowalsky​ ​​ ​​ ​
Title: ​ ​Director, TLO​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​ Title: ​ ​Chief Legal Officer​ ​​ ​​ ​
Exhibit 13.1



CERTIFICATION OF WILLIAM MORRO, MANAGING
DIRECTOR OF
BLUENRGY GROUP LIMITED PURSUANT TO SECTION 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report
of BlueNRGY Group Limited (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the period ending June 30, 2017, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned hereby certifies that to the best of his
knowledge:



1. The Report fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2. The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: October 27, 2017



|By: | /s/ William Morro                                                        | 
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------ | 
|    | Name: William MorroTitle: Managing Director(Principal Executive Officer) |
§ 457.110 Self-evaluation. ( a ) The agency shall, by August 24, 1987, evaluate its current policies and practices, and the effects thereof, that do not or may not meet the requirements of this part, and, to the extent modification of any such policies and practices is required, the agency shall proceed to make the necessary modifications.
( b ) The agency shall provide an opportunity to interested persons, including handicapped persons or organizations representing handicapped persons, to participate in the self-evaluation process by submitting comments (both oral and written).
( c ) The agency shall, until three years following the completion of the self-evaluation, maintain on file and make available for public inspection: ( 1 ) A description of areas examined and any problems identified, and
( 2 ) A description of any modifications made.
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 35 (Tuesday, February 22, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 9742]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-3813]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS


Agenda and Notice of Public Meeting of the Vermont Advisory 
Committee

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the rules and 
regulations of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights (Commission), and 
the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA), that briefing and planning 
meetings of the Vermont Advisory Committee to the Commission will 
convene at 10:30 a.m. (EST) on Monday, March 7, 2011, at the Vermont 
State House, 115 State Street, Room 11, Montpelier, VT 05633.
    The purpose of the briefing is to discuss criminal justice data 
collection and analysis procedures. The purpose of the planning meeting 
is to plan future activities.
    Members of the public are entitled to submit written comments; the 
comments must be received in the regional office by April 7, 2011. 
Written comments may be mailed, e-mailed, or faxed to the Eastern 
Regional Office (ERO). Persons who desire additional information may 
make their request by mail, e-mail, phone, or fax. See contact 
information below.
    Records generated from these meetings may be inspected and 
reproduced at the ERO, as they become available, both before and after 
the meetings. Persons interested in the work of this advisory committee 
are directed to the Commission's Web site, http://www.usccr.gov, or may 
contact the ERO. See contact information below.
    Persons who are deaf or hearing-impaired who will attend the 
meetings and require the services of a sign language interpreter should 
contact the ERO at least ten (10) days before the scheduled date of the 
meeting either by e-mail or TDD relay service. See contact information 
below.
    The meetings will be conducted pursuant to the provisions of the 
rules and regulations of the Commission and FACA.

Contact Information

    Mailing address: Eastern Regional Office, U.S. Commission on Civil 
Rights, 624 Ninth Street, NW., Suite 740, Washington, DC 20425.
    Telephone #: 202-376-7533.
    Fax #: 202-376-7548.
    E-mail address: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#1673647956636575756438717960"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="7a1f08153a0f09191908541d150c">[email protected]</span></a>.
    TDD: Dial 711 for relay services and dial 202-376-7533.

    Dated in Washington, DC, on February 15, 2011.
Peter Minarik,
Acting Chief, Regional Programs Coordination Unit.
[FR Doc. 2011-3813 Filed 2-18-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6335-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 214 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 214

  Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives regarding the 
 United States share of any reconstruction measures undertaken in the 
     Balkans region of Europe on account of the armed conflict and 
  atrocities that have occurred in the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia 
                         since March 24, 1999.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 16, 1999

 Mr. Hefley submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                the Committee on International Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives regarding the 
 United States share of any reconstruction measures undertaken in the 
     Balkans region of Europe on account of the armed conflict and 
  atrocities that have occurred in the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia 
                         since March 24, 1999.

    Resolved,

SECTION 1. SENSE OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ON UNITED STATES SHARE 
              OF RECONSTRUCTION COSTS.

    It is the sense of the House of Representatives that the United 
States share of the total costs of reconstruction measures carried out 
in the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia or contiguous countries, on 
account of the armed conflict and atrocities that have occurred in the 
Federal Republic of Yugoslavia since March 24, 1999, should not exceed 
the United States percentage share of the common-funded budgets of 
NATO.

SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS.

    In this resolution:
            (1) Common-funded budgets of nato.--The term ``common-
        funded budgets of NATO'' means--
                    (A) the Military Budget, the Security Investment 
                Program, and the Civil Budget of NATO; and
                    (B) any successor or additional account or program 
                of NATO.
            (2) Federal republic of yugoslavia.--The term ``Federal 
        Republic of Yugoslavia'' means the Federal Republic of 
        Yugoslavia (Serbia and Montenegro) and includes Kosovo.
            (3) United states percentage share of the common-funded 
        budgets of nato.--The term ``United States percentage share of 
        the common-funded budgets of NATO'' means the percentage that 
        the total of all United States payments during a fiscal year to 
        the common-funded budgets of NATO represent to the total 
        amounts payable by all NATO members to those budgets during 
        that fiscal year.
                                 <all>
```
April 8, 2014 Page | 1



## NCES Response to Public Comments Received Regarding the State of Preschool Survey 201 4 - 201 6 Data Collection

**PUBLIC COMMENT 1**  **– Tariq A**  **ziz** 

### Further education in USA In today ’s times the best country to look for, as a seeker of higher education is The United states of America. Although the cost of education can be higher in the USA compared to that of the country you belong to... but the other way of looking at it is for the parents is t o take it as an investment for the future of your child. As once your child reaches the USA he can make a career for himself as there are tremendous opportunities here for him to grab on to. The USA has worlds’ highl y rated institutions. These institutions are leaders in regards to course curriculum and education quality in which they provide. The overall quality

of education offered in the US colleges and universities is compared as best on the planet. The certificate and degree earned from a US college / university is touted as as Hallmark to further career. The Universities like MIT, Harvard, CIT, Berkeley , John Hopkins,......... Etc. are the institutions in which many dream to get admitted in. These institutions conducting ground breaking research and inventing new technologies for the cause of mankind. For more details on further education in USA visit http://www.scoregetter.com or email at info@scoregetter.com **NCES RESPONSE TO COMMENT 1**  We appreciate the recommendation for postsecondary education in the United States . Early educational experiences can help set the foundation for successful elementary, secondary, and ultimately, postsecondar y educational outcomes. For data on postsecondary education, we recommend visiting http://nces.ed.gov. **PUBLI C COMMENT**  **2 –**  **Jean Public** 

### this should be done every 5 y ears. it is not necessary to have this done every

y ear. it is time to clos down the high spending going on at the ed dept.
**NCES RESPONSE TO COMMENT**  **2** We appreciate the concern about public spending and have worked carefully to limit the cost of the data collection and data reporting associated with this study. We are not sure how data collection done ever y 5 years could be used to study annual changes in programs and how those relate to regularly c hanging populations being served. To ensure that polic y m ak ers have up - to - date information on programs that require substantial investments of scarce resources each year, NCES will collect and report the data annually.
-86 -84 -82 -80 -78 -76 -74 -72

34 36 38 40 

### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 100 18 12 06 00 06/01 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 01 Jun 06

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 39.06 N 76.88 WMeters AGL
Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the 

Atlantic and Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the 

Court of any formal errors so that corrections may be made before the bound 

volumes go to press. 

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS

No. 20-BG-380

IN RE WILLIAM F. BURTON

2020 DDN 108

A Member of the Bar of the

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Bar Registration No. 431812

BEFORE: Thompson and Deahl, Associate Judges, and Nebeker, Senior Judge. 

O R D E R

(FILED— August 27, 2020)

On consideration of the certified order from the state of Virginia suspending 

respondent from the practice of law in that jurisdiction by consent for a period of 

one year and one day with reinstatement conditioned on satisfying the imposed 

conditions; this court’s June 22, 2020, order suspending respondent pending 

resolution of this matter and directing him to show cause why reciprocal discipline 

should not be imposed; and the statement of Disciplinary Counsel wherein he 

requests that this court impose a substantially different discipline and require a 

showing of fitness for reinstatement; and no response having been filed by 

respondent; and it appearing respondent has not filed his D.C. Bar R. XI, §14(g)

affidavit, it is 

ORDERED that William F. Burton is hereby suspended from the practice of 

law in the District of Columbia for a period of one year and one day with 

reinstatement contingent on a showing of fitness and compliance with the conditions 

imposed by the state of Virginia. See D.C. Bar R. XI, § 11(c)(4). Respondent’s 

extended neglect of his client, his numerous instances of dishonesty, as well as his 

failure to cooperate with both the state of Virginia and this jurisdiction in 
No. 20-BG-380

disciplinary investigations establish a serious doubt that respondent is fit to practice 

law; thereby supporting the imposition of a fitness requirement prior to 

reinstatement. See, e.g., In re Thompson, 195 A.3d 64, 64-65 (D.C. 2018) 

(respondent’s continued failure to cooperate with disciplinary investigations may be 

considered when imposing discipline); In re Cater, 887 A.2d 1, 24 (D.C. 2015) 

(discussing the considerations for imposing a fitness requirement). It is 

FURTHER ORDERED that for purposes of reinstatement respondent’s 

suspension will not begin to run until such time as he files an affidavit that fully 

complies with the requirements of D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14(g). 

PER CURIAM
J\'ATUHP,L G

p

p

p

p

p

p

p

p

p

P

lJ

;)

P

p

P

p

Grl®

&EPA

UlHteu SWlC~

EnvtrOlll11Cn1Bl f;flutcelion

Agency

----_._.-------- --_._--

Research aIle)

If::;§

~~y\\ If0.'~it .. 0-~tr.;-~ p' -m·.'..r - _ - y

Cix -9!1l: Fi41·~<L

iVlt:TlIANE 1:'1\111,:',.)1',.,1'\,,:: 1110lVl TTTl<

lNDUSTH't'

GRI-94 I 0?573C,

EPA 600lR9G OIlOm

June 1996

Volurne 13: Cllcnlical

Prep.alred for

Energy Informalion Adm iniolr'alio1i (U, ;.;, DOE)

Prep.aredby

National Risl< Manag€.ment

Research Laboratory

Research Triangle Park, NC 27711

REPRODUCf:08Y N..OO lJ,S,Dllpar1rnen!ol CO:nurlO.fi:f>

r~l.!~oiiiil-rttetll't!ciat_!t'lfQ"l1dl!O;nS.,rvICIl

Spritlgfiel'd Vi:rginia?1W1
EMISSION

Site information was used to determine the average actuation rate

(strokes/min), the fraction type of pump (piston versus diaphragm), and the

pef'celltaf~e of opf:ral.mg time for each of pump. The manufacturers' data were used to

An

of gasJ1stn)ke) Radian cornbined

this .:>\.-\.-UV,.l, to calculate

stroke

of pump

site inf(}rnlaticm and manufacUlret'S'

each

detemline the volume of

average pump emission factor was calculated by cornbinirlg

diaphragm and piston pumps:

emission factors for

PUlJIP (4)

pump = methanl~/pump)l"i,mn +

x

EFavg. pump = 248 scfe! methane/pump

the frai:tioil1 of each is from COIIcelCpttlg the data

emission factor callculatilons, and the resulting national emission rates are discussed in this

Diaphragm Pum~

Calculation of the emission for diaphragm pumps was based 'lIl the

== Gas

th'1e x

(scjtJsllrokl~) x FfeQiuenl::Y (strok:eslt:lay) X Operatillg

p
where:

Operating time

% Methane

portion of the year that the pump is operating (0.40 ±

78.8 mol % ± 5 % for the production segment.

total mellhal1e elnisl;ion diaplu'aglm pumps SCf(jjpLlmp ±

PistQn Pumps

was on the followin[!

where:

= (acf/stroke) x Density x Frequency

{stl'okl~s/(jay X Operating x % methane

hqUlltlon 3

sef/aef at supply pressure (average psig)

(combined average value of volume a'1d densiIy is 0,0037 ±

65% seE/stroke:).

strokes per average pump ±

(6)

Opl~ratjng time

methane

of the year that the pump is opt~rating

78.8 mol % for the proo.uctiOfi !':epme'n!

±

resulting methane emission factor piston pumps is scfd/pump ± 106%

are

on

(0.498 ± piston pumps ± 38%diaphragm pumps from Table to

produce an emission factor for a typical chemical injection pump of ± 83% sd'dhJurnn.

p 0