alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-01-2000
<CASH>                                           3,201
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  129,329
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,047
<INVENTORY>                                     65,541
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               212,074
<PP&E>                                         984,319
<DEPRECIATION>                                 422,438
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 828,607
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          206,069
<BONDS>                                      1,045,301
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   (436,498)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   828,607
<SALES>                                        618,116
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               618,116
<CGS>                                          512,387
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  512,387
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                40,818
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              76,284
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (11,373)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       742
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (12,115)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (12,115)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
IV

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 1

Electing officers of the House of Representatives.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 6, 1999

Mr. WATTS of Oklahoma submitted the following resolution; which was

considered and agreed to

RESOLUTION

Electing officers of the House of Representatives.

1 Resolved, That Jeffrey J. Trandahl of the Common2 wealth of Virginia be, and is hereby, chosen Clerk of the

3 House of Representatives; be it further

4 Resolved, That Wilson S. Livingood of the Common5 wealth of Virginia be, and is hereby, chosen Sergeant at

6 Arms of the House of Representatives; be it further

7 Resolved, That James M. Eagen III, of the Common8 wealth of Pennsylvania be, and is hereby, chosen Chief Ad9 ministrative Officer of the House of Representatives; and

10 be it further
2

HRES 1 ATH

1 Resolved, That Reverend James David Ford of the

2 Commonwealth of Virginia be, and is hereby, chosen

3 Chaplain of the House of Representatives.

Æ
### §20202. Original appointments: qualifications

(a) In General.—An original appointment as a commissioned officer in the Space Force may be given only to a person who—

(1) is a citizen of the United States;

(2) is at least 18 years of age; and

(3) has such other physical, mental, moral, professional, and age qualifications as the Secretary of the Air Force may prescribe by regulation.

(b) Exception.—A person who is otherwise qualified, but who has a physical condition that the Secretary of the Air Force determines will not interfere with the performance of the duties to which that person may be assigned, may be appointed as an officer in the Space Force.

(Added Pub. L. 118–31, div. A, title XVII, §1716(a), Dec. 22, 2023, 137 Stat. 632.)
November 19, 2014

Mr. Kevin Schlemmer, Chief, EAS Division Office ofAviation Analysis U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 New JerseyAvenue, S.E. Washington, DC 20590 i "'-

__;,

Re: Continuation ofAlaska Airlines' Essential Air Service at Cordova, Gustavus, Petersburg, Wrangell, and Yakutat, Alaska, Docket OST-1998-4899

Dear Mr. Schlemmer : This letter is to express strong support forthe selection ofAlaska Airlines to continue to provide essential airservice toWrangell, Alaska. Alaska's service connects SoutheastAlaska passengers to one or more major communities of interest, with single-plane service to Anchorage, Juneau, Ketchikan or Seattle. From these hubs, our community can access the airline's extensive route system and benefit from its marketing relationships with othercarriers. The passenger and cargo aircraft, which Alaska Airlines proposes to continue using on this route, provides freight, mail and cargo capacitythat other carriers simply cannot provide. Further, Alaska Airlines aircraft are equipped with Required Navigation Performance Technology, which enables the airline to reliably access the airport during inclement weather, thus reducing diversions and cancellations and, in turn, enabling people and products to dependably reach the community. Simply put, Alaska Airlines' service is critical to the economicwell being ofour community and theWrangell Chamber ofCommerce supports their application to provide Essential Air Service to SoutheastAlaska.
Sincerely,
Cyni Waddington Executive Director Wrangell ChamberofCommerce 107 Stikine Ave. P.O. Box 49 Wrangell, AK 99929 907-874-3901 cyni@wrangellchamber.org
§ 175.320 What will happen if my service is disconnected and my account remains delinquent? ( a ) If your service has been disconnected and you still have an outstanding balance, we will assess you interest, penalties, and administrative costs in accordance with 31 CFR 901.9.
( b ) We must forward your delinquent balance to the United States Treasury if it is not paid within 180 days after the original due date in accordance with 31 CFR 901.1.
#### § 115.428 Will you automatically receive all of your trust funds when you reach the age of 18?

No, we will not automatically send your trust funds to you when you reach the age of 18.
Order entered April 17, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-12-01662-CV

DAVID MONTGOMERY, Appellant

V.

U. S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 4

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CC-12-04679-D

ORDER

Before the Court is appellee’s April 1, 2013 motion to dismiss the appeal for failure to 

prosecute. Appellee contends the appeal should be dismissed because the clerk’s record and 

reporter’s record are past due. On April 1, 2013, the Court sent notices that the clerk’s record 

and reporter’s record are to be filed within thirty days. Accordingly, we DENY appellee’s 

motion.

/s/ DAVID LEWIS 

JUSTICE
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on January 13, 2011, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), MarineNet, LLC (“MarineNet”) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing (1) the identities of the parties to the venture and (2) the nature and objectives of the venture. The notifications were filed for the purpose of invoking the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances.                

Pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act, the identities of the parties to the venture are: ACL Transportation Services LLC, Jeffersonville, IN; Ingram Barge Company, Nashville, TN; and AEP River Operations LLC, Chesterfield, MO. The general area of MarineNet's planned activity is researching, evaluating, testing and developing a process or service to establish and support a platform for the electronic transfer of data between contracting river industry trading partners (the “value added network” or “VAN”). The VAN will provide for the ability to electronically transmit order, status, and invoice information between contracting river trading partners internal systems, promoting efficiency within the river industry.

Patricia A. Brink,

Director of Civil Enforcement, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 2011-3854 Filed 2-18-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
#### The G. *&*P. AMUSEMENT COMPANY, Appellant, v. REGENT THEATER COMPANY, et al., Appellees.

No. 12068.

United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit.

Nov. 16, 1954.

Samuel T. Gaines, Cleveland, Ohio (Bennett Yanowitz, Cleveland, Ohio, on the brief), for appellants.

Luther Day and Jerome N. Curtis, Cleveland, Ohio (Charles R. Berne, Jordan C. Band, Thomas M. Harman, George H. Rudolph, Cleveland, Ohio, on the brief), for appellees.

Before ALLEN, MARTIN and MILLER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The District Court dismissed the amended and supplemental complaint of appellant and entered judgment for appellees in this action for treble damages brought by appellant against the appellee motion picture distributors and exhibitors for alleged violation of sections 1, 2 and 7 of the Sherman Anti-Trust Act, 15 U.S.C.A. § 1 et seq., and sections 4 and 16 of the Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C.A. §§15 and 26.

We have thoughtfully considered the arguments advanced, the record in the case, the comprehensive and logically reasoned opinion of District Judge Freed, 107 F.Supp. 453, together with his eighty-seven findings of fact, which are supported by substantial evidence and certainly are not clearly erroneous, and his seven conclusions of law, sustained by highest authority. Upon the *750basis of his opinion, findings and conelusions, we are of opinion that the judgment of the District Court should be affirmed, and that no worthwhile contribution would be made by this court by attempting to re-write in our own words the excellent opinion of the District Judge, who gave most conscientious study to the problems presented and has stated accurate conclusions,

The judgment of the District Court is affirmed.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-6165

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

MARTIN AVERY HUGHES,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of Virginia, at Abingdon. James P. Jones, District 

Judge. (1:08-cr-00024-jpj-35; 1:10-cv-80232-jpj-mfu)

Submitted: June 29, 2011 Decided: July 11, 2011

Before MOTZ, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Martin Avery Hughes, Appellant Pro Se. Jennifer R. Bockhorst, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Abingdon, Virginia, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Martin Avery Hughes seeks to appeal the district 

court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 

Supp. 2010) motion. The order is not appealable unless a 

circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 

28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2006). A certificate of 

appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of 

the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) 

(2006). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a 

prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that 

reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s 

assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. 

Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller-El v. 

Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). When the district court 

denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must 

demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is 

debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the 

denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that 

Hughes has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny 

a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials 
3

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

DISMISSED
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 7 (Tuesday, January 11, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 1625]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-382]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Cancer Institute; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Cancer Institute Initial Review 
Group; Subcommittee I--Career Development, Career Development.
    Date: February 22-23, 2011.
    Time: February 22, 2011, 8 a.m. to 6 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate to review and evaluate grant 
applications.
    Place: Hilton Alexandria Old Town, 1767 King Street, Alexandria, 
VA 22314.
    Time: February 23, 2011, 8 a.m. to 6 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate to review and evaluate grant 
applications.
    Place: Hilton Alexandria Old Town, 1767 King Street, Alexandria, 
VA 22314.
    Contact Person: Sergei Radaev, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, 
Resources And Training Review Branch, Division Of Extramural 
Activities, National Cancer Institute, NIH, 6116 Executive Blvd., RM 
8113, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-435-5655, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#2e7d7c6f6a6f6b786e636f67620060676600696178"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="e2b1b0a3a6a3a7b4a2afa3abaeccacabaacca5adb4">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.392, 
Cancer Construction; 93.393, Cancer Cause and Prevention Research; 
93.394, Cancer Detection and Diagnosis Research; 93.395, Cancer 
Treatment Research; 93.396, Cancer Biology Research; 93.397, Cancer 
Centers Support; 93.398, Cancer Research Manpower; 93.399, Cancer 
Control, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: January 4, 2011.
Jennifer S. Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2011-382 Filed 1-10-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### § 140.17 Tobacco sales to minors.

No trader shall sell tobacco, cigars, or cigarettes to any Indian under 18 years of age.
§ 171.305 Will BIA provide leaching service to me? ( a ) We may provide you leaching service if: ( 1 ) You submit a written plan that documents how soil salinity limits your crop production and how leaching service will correct the problem;
( 2 ) We approve your plan in writing; and
( 3 ) Your irrigation bills are not past due.
( b ) Leaching service will only be available during the timeframe established by your irrigation facility.
( c ) We reserve the right to terminate this service if we determine you are not complying with paragraph (a) of this section.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Graham Packaging Holdings Company on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30,
2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Mark S. Burgess, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Graham Packaging Holdings
Company.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: August 3, 2010

|    |  |                                        
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------
|    | 
|By: |  | /s/ Mark S. Burgess                    
|    |  | Mark S. Burgess Chief
Executive Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 

Home : Media : Photos

slide show module

Guam National Guard launches State Partnership with Palau

USARPAC, Philippine Air Force combine air defense systems for first time ever during Exercise Balikatan 24

USS Howard conducts routine flight quarters while transiting the South China Sea

MARFORPAC, Philippine marines conduct key terrain security mission during Exercise Balikatan 24

USS Theodore Roosevelt conducts routine flight operations in the South China Sea

MARFORPAC, Philippine Marine Corps conduct small unmanned aerial system integrated training during Exercise Balikatan 24

USARPAC, Philippine Army integrate for jungle operations training during Exercise Balikatan 24

US, Philippines conduct combined HALO jump training during Balikatan 24

US, Philippine service members conduct community health engagement before Exercise Balikatan 24

MRF-D conducts live-fire training in Australia
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsDesign Requirements for Unmanned Rotorcraft Used in Low-Risk Concepts of OperationThis technical report presents the results of the second of two research studies on design and performance requirements supporting airworthiness certification of midrange unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) intended for commercial use. The two studies focused attention on UAS in the middle of the multidimensional spectrum of UAS; that is, UAS with attributes and capabilities exceeding the criteria to operate under Part 107 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (FARs), but without the design or operational capabilities to comply with the airworthiness standards for commercially-operated manned aircraft. The goal of the two studies was to help address the gap in airworthiness standards for some UAS that fall between the extremes.Document ID20160014852Acquisition SourceLangley Research CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsHayhurst, Kelly J.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Maddalon, Jeffrey M.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Neogi, Natasha A.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Verstynen, Harry A.*(Whirlwind Engineering, LLC Poquoson, VA, United States)*Date AcquiredDecember 22, 2016Publication DateNovember 1, 2016Subject CategoryAircraft Design, Testing And PerformanceAircraft Stability And ControlReport/Patent NumberNASA/TM-2016-219345NF1676L-25788L-20763Funding Number(s)WBS: WBS 357672.04.04.07.02CONTRACT_GRANT: SAA1-17902CONTRACT_GRANT: SAA1-17878Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightPublic Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType20160014852.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
H. Res. 22

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

January 19, 1999.

Resolved, That the following named Members be, and are

hereby, elected to the following standing committee of the

House of Representatives:

COMMITTEE ON STANDARDS OF OFFICIAL CONDUCT:

Mr. Hefley of Colorado, Mr. Knollenberg of Michigan, Mr.

Portman of Ohio, and Mr. Camp of Michigan.

Attest:

Clerk.