alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**MEMORANDUM**

DATE: May

18, 2015 TO: Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants; Docket I d: OAR

– 2013
- 0602 FROM: EPA Region 1 SUBJECT: May

15, 2015 Presentation for Boston Green Academy Students on Proposed Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants
**SUMMARY** On May 15, 2015, Cy

nthia Greene and Shutsu Wong presented the proposed Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants to students during Boston Green Academ y’s Environmental Justice Youth Forum. **ATTENDEES** Cy nthia Greene, E PA Shutsu Wong, EPA Approximately 25 students attended the presentations . Attendance was not taken b y EPA Slides are attached.
EXHIBIT 35.1





SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT





I, Julia A. Sloat, certify that:





(a) A review of AEP Texas Central Company’s (the “Servicer”) activities during the reporting period covered by this Report on Form 10-K and of its performance under that certain Transition Property Servicing Agreement dated as of March 14, 2012 between AEP Texas Central Transition Funding III LLC, as the Issuing Entity, and the Servicer (the "Servicing Agreement") has been made under my supervision.





(b) To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Servicing Agreement in all material respects throughout the reporting period.





Date: March 28, 2016





/s/ Julia A. Sloat


Name:  Julia A. Sloat


Title: Treasurer and Senior Officer in Charge of


the Servicing Function, AEP Texas Central Company, as Servicer
155 So.2d 338

#### W. E. NORRELL, Jr. v. Kirke (S. K.) ADAMS, Judge of Probate.

4 Div. 152.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

June 27, 1963.

John C. Walters, Troy, for appellant.

Chas. L. Woods and Chas. O. Stokes, Ozark, for appellee.

GOODWYN, Justice.

On October 19, 1962, appellant filed in the circuit court of Dale County a petition for mandamus to require appellee, the Judge of Probate of said county, to make certain changes in the names of candidates for county commissioner from district No. 3 on ballots to be used in the general election to be held on November 6, 1962. The trial court issued a rule nisi on October 19, and set “a hearing on the rule nisi” for October 25. An oral hearing was had on the date set and on October 26 a judgment was rendered denying the petition for mandamus. On October 29, petitioner took this appeal from that judgment. The case was submitted here on March 29, 1963.

It seems clear that the case is moot. Accordingly, we have no alternative but to dismiss the appeal. It has been held that if an event, pending appeal, makes determination of the appeal unnecessary, or renders it clearly impossible for the appellate court to grant effectual relief, the appeal will be dismissed. State ex rel. City of Prichard v. Jansen, 271 Ala. 104, 106, 122 So.2d 736; McDonald v. Lyle, 270 Ala. 715, 717, 121 So.2d 885; State ex rel. Lloyd v. Morris, 262 Ala. 432, 433, 79 So.2d 431; Shelton v. Shelton, 248 Ala. 48, 49, 26 So.2d 553.

Appeal dismissed.

LIVINGSTON, C. J., and LAWSON and COLEMAN, JJ., concur.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access to publicationsin the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging and locatorservices, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications (CGP). Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event that publicationsare no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Summer motor vehicle use map.White River National Forest. Rifle Ranger District, Colorado**
 
2016
 
SuDoc:A 13.28:W 58/21/
Item Number:0080-G (online)
CGP systemNumber:001036913
 
December 7, 2017
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**Certificate pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to**

**Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

** **

In connection withthe Quarterly Report of GB&T Bancshares, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the period ended March 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Gregory L. Hamby,Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, to the best of my knowledge,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.                                       TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.                                       Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ Gregory L. Hamby                       |   |   |
|--------------------------------------------|--------|--------|
| Gregory L. Hamby, Chief  Financial Officer |   |
|                                       |   |
|                                       |   |
| May 10, 2005                          |   |

 

1

----
MEMEINSIM=IiiIIMMNBM

cc: Hon. Robert W. Lane, District Judge McDonald Adras LLC Nye County District Attorney Attorney General/Carson City Nye County Clerk Donald Ray Deloney

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

(0) 1947A 2
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Graham Packaging Holdings Company
on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Mark S. Burgess, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Graham Packaging Holdings Company.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: May 4, 2009



|    |  |                              
|--- |  | -----------------------------
|By: |  | /s/    Mark S. Burgess       
|    |  | Mark S. Burgess              
|    |  | Chief Executive Officer      
|    |  | (principal financial officer)

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
#### § 141.29 Political contributions restricted.

No reservation business owner who is ineligible to vote in a Navajo tribal election may grant or donate any money or goods to any candidate for election to Navajo tribal office.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News

Language-Enabled Airmen Strengthen Commitment to Regional Allies During Exercise Cope North 2023June 28, 2023 — Two Japanese Language Enabled Airman Program Scholars worked alongside U.S. Air Force airfield experts to advance a free and open Indo-Pacific through the exchange of skills with the Japan Air Self-Defense Force and Royal Australian Air Force partners during Exercise Cope North 2023 (CN23), which took place Feb. 2-22, 2023, at Andersen Air Force Base, Guam... MORE 

----

COPE NORTH 15 kicks off at AndersenFebruary 18, 2015 — Exercise Cope North 15 kicked off Feb. 15 at Andersen Air Force Base, Guam, and will run through Feb. 27.This year marks the 86th iteration of the multilateral training exercise which is a... MORE 

----

2024 (327)2023 (825)2022 (1193)2021 (1066)2020 (1083)2019 (1166)2018 (1116)2017 (1356)2016 (1475)2015 (1408)2014 (904)2013 (32)2012 (4)

About DoDDoD CareersJoin the MilitaryNewsUSA.govPhotos & VideosPrivacy & SecurityTop Issues

US INDOPACOM Inspector GeneralDoD Inspector General Accessibility/Section 508DoD FOIAUS INDOPACOM FOIALink DisclaimerNo FEAR ActRecovery ActINDOPACOM Webmaster

                  - Facebook
                  - X
                  - YouTube
                  - Instagram
                  - RSS

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997             DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997             JUN-28-1998
<CASH>                                           7,218                   5,088
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   70,930                  82,140
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,635                   1,612
<INVENTORY>                                     32,236                  30,789
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               117,947                 127,986
<PP&E>                                         587,910                 625,286
<DEPRECIATION>                                 327,614                 344,716
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 385,491                 439,558
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          113,132                 111,727
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                             0                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                         337               (331,863)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   385,491                 439,558
<SALES>                                        521,707                 279,471
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               521,707                 279,471
<CGS>                                          437,301                 223,002
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  437,301                 223,002
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                58,653                  44,166
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              14,940                  25,666
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 10,813                (13,363)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       600                       8
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             10,213                (13,371)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                     675
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                    10,213                (14,046)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0                       0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0                       0
        

</TABLE>
#### § 170.510 What funds are available for Tribal Transportation Facility Bridge activities?

Funds are made available in 23 U.S.C. 202(d) for improving deficient bridges eligible for the TTP.
#### § 166.420 Will any special fees be assessed on delinquent grazing rental payments due under a permit?

The following special fees will be assessed if a grazing rental payment is not paid in the time and manner required, in addition to any interest or late payment penalties which must be paid to the Indian landowners under a permit. The following special fees will be assessed to cover administrative costs incurred by the United States in the collection of the debt:

| The permittee will pay * * * | For * * * |
| --- | --- |
| (a) $50.00 | Administrative fee for checks returned by the bank for insufficient funds. |
| (b) $15.00 | Administrative fee for the BIA processing of each demand letter. |
| (c) 18% of balance due | Administrative fee charged by the Department of Treasury for collection. |
§ 1000.363 What if the trust evaluation reveals problems that do not rise to the level of imminent jeopardy? Where problems not rising to the level of imminent jeopardy are caused by Tribal action or inaction, the conditions must be: ( a ) Documented in the annual trust evaluation report;
( b ) Reported to the Secretary; and
( c ) Reported in writing to: ( 1 ) The governing body of the Tribe; and
( 2 ) In the case of a Consortium, to the governing body of each Tribe on whose behalf the Consortium is performing the trust functions.
#### § 162.587 What happens if BIA disapproves an amendment, assignment, sublease, or leasehold mortgage of a WSR lease?

If we disapprove an amendment, assignment, sublease, or leasehold mortgage of a WSR lease, we will notify the parties immediately and advise the landowners of their right to appeal the decision under part 2 of this chapter.
Exhibit 32.2    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of ProLung, Inc. (formerly Fresh Medical Laboratories Inc.) (the Company) for the year ended December 31, 2016, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Steven Eror, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge: 1.The  Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and2.The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.Dated:April 17, 2017/s/ Steven ErorSteven ErorPrincipal Accounting Officer
§ 101.10 Federal Reserve Regulation Z and Fair Credit Reporting Act. ( a ) United States direct loans and loans made by a relending organization are subject to the provisions of Federal Reserve Regulation Z (Truth In Lending, 12 CFR part 226; Pub. L. 91-508, 84 Stat. 1127). Economic enterprises which extend credit and require payment of finance charges on unpaid balances will determine the applicability of Regulation Z and comply with the requirements thereof. The Commissioner will issue any necessary instructions to assure compliance with Regulation Z on United States direct loans.
( b ) Relending organizations, through their committee or other body authorized to act on loan matters on its behalf, will assure compliance with the applicable provisions of this Act.
( c ) The Commissioner will require adherence to the provisions and requirements of title VI of the Fair Credit Reporting Act in making United States direct loans. Relending organizations, through the body authorized to act on credit matters, will require compliance with the requirements of the Fair Credit Reporting Act.
#### Emerson S. Mayo, Trading as Glen Brothers, Respondent, v. Emma Zietlow, Appellant.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.
Exhibit 32.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Graham Packaging Holdings
Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 26, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Philip
R. Yates, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
     1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
     2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of Graham Packaging Holdings Company.

Date: November 10, 2004


                                        By: /s/ Philip R. Yates
                                           -----------------------------------
                                           Philip R. Yates
                                           Chief Executive Officer




















































                                       1
<PAGE>
§ 162.451 What is the approval process for an assignment of a business lease? ( a ) When we receive an assignment that meets the requirements of this subpart, we will notify the parties of the date we receive it. If our approval is required, we have 30 days from receipt of the executed assignment, proof of required consents, and required documentation to approve or disapprove the assignment. Our determination whether to approve the assignment will be in writing and will state the basis for our approval or disapproval.
( b ) If we do not meet the deadline in this section, the lessee or Indian landowners may take appropriate action under § 162.463.
### **CHAPTER 33—ORIGINAL APPOINTMENTS OF REGULAR OFFICERS IN GRADES ABOVE WARRANT OFFICER GRADES**

Sec.
531.
Original appointments of commissioned officers.
532.
Qualifications for original appointment as a commissioned officer.
533.
Service credit upon original appointment as a commissioned officer.
541.
Graduates of the United States Military, Naval, and Air Force Academies.
[555 to 565. Repealed.]

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**1991**—Pub. L. 102–190, div. A, title XI, §1112(b)(1), Dec. 5, 1991, 105 Stat. 1501, substituted "ORIGINAL APPOINTMENTS OF REGULAR OFFICERS IN GRADES ABOVE WARRANT OFFICER GRADES" for "APPOINTMENTS IN REGULAR COMPONENTS" as chapter heading, struck out analysis of subchapters listing subchapter I "Original Appointments of Regular Officers in Grades above Warrant Officer Grades" and subchapter II "Appointments of Regular Warrant Officers", and struck out subchapter I heading.

**1980**—Pub. L. 96–513, title I, §104(a), Dec. 12, 1980, 94 Stat. 2845, inserted an analysis of subchapters immediately following chapter heading, added subchapter I heading, and, in analysis of sections following subchapter I heading, added items 531, 532, and 533 preceding item 541, re-enacted item 541 without change, and struck out, following item 541, items 555 to 565. The items 555 to 565 formerly set out in the analysis of sections immediately following chapter heading were transferred to a position following a new heading for subchapter II preceding section 555.
#### § 17.11 Inspection of wills and approval as to form during testator's lifetime.

When a will has been executed and filed with the superintendent during the lifetime of the testator, the will shall be considered by the special attorney who may endorse on such will “approved as to form.” A will shall be held in absolute confidence and its contents shall not be divulged prior to the death of the testator.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

NALIK SHARIFF S. SCOTT,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 348 EAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 24th day of December, 2019, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED.
§ 170.423 How are annual updates or amendments to the TTIP conducted? ( a ) The TTIP annual update allows: ( 1 ) Changes to schedules and funding amounts for identified projects and activities; and
( 2 ) The addition of transportation projects and activities planned for the next four years.
( b ) During the first quarter of a fiscal year, Tribes will be notified of the opportunity to update their TTIP. This notification will contain information on where the Tribes can access their estimated TTP funding amounts for that fiscal year, and will include a copy of their previously approved TTIP, as well as instructions for submitting the annual update.
( c ) The Tribe must then review any new transportation planning information and priority lists, update their TTIP using the procedures in § 170.421, and forward the documentation to their respective BIA Regional Office or to FHWA.
( d ) If forwarded to: ( 1 ) A BIA Regional Office—The Office will review all submitted information with the Tribe and provide a written response (concurring, denying, or requesting additional information) within 45 days. If the BIA regional office concurs in the TTIP, it is then forwarded to FHWA for final approval.
( 2 ) FHWA-FHWA will review all submitted information with the Tribe and provide a written response (approving, denying, or requesting additional information) within 45 days. Once a proposed TTIP update is approved by FHWA, it will be included in that year's overall TTPTIP.
( e ) The Tribe may amend their approved TTIP at any time using the procedures in § 170.421 and paragraph (d) of this section in order to add a new project or activity within the current fiscal year that they intend to expend TTP funds on.