alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2013270EN.01001201.xml

| 19.9.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 270/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.9.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 270/12

---

Notice of the impending expiry of certain anti-dumping measures

2013/C 270/10

1.   As provided for in Article 11(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 of 30 November 2009 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community (1), the Commission gives notice that, unless a review is initiated in accordance with the following procedure, the anti-dumping measures mentioned below will expire on the date mentioned in the table below.

1

2.   Procedure

Procedure

Union producers may lodge a written request for a review. This request must contain sufficient evidence that the expiry of the measures would be likely to result in a continuation or recurrence of dumping and injury.

Should the Commission decide to review the measures concerned, importers, exporters, representatives of the exporting country and Union producers will then be provided with the opportunity to amplify, rebut or comment on the matters set out in the review request.

3.   Time limit

Time limit

Union producers may submit a written request for a review on the above basis, to reach the European Commission, Directorate-General for Trade (Unit H-1), N-105 8/20, 1049 Brussels, Belgium (2) at any time from the date of the publication of the present notice but no later than three months before the date mentioned in the table below.

2

4.   This notice is published in accordance with Article 11(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009.

| Product | Country(ies) of origin or exportation | Measures | Reference | Date of expiry (3) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Certain PSC wires and strands | People's Republic of China | Anti-dumping duty | Council Regulation (EC) No 383/2009 (OJ L 118, 13.5.2009, p. 1) as amended by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 986/2012 (OJ L 297, 26.10.2012, p. 1) | 14.5.2014 |

Product

Country(ies) of origin or exportation

Measures

Reference

Date of expiry (3)

3

Certain PSC wires and strands

People's Republic of China

Anti-dumping duty

Council Regulation (EC) No 383/2009 (OJ L 118, 13.5.2009, p. 1) as amended by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 986/2012 (OJ L 297, 26.10.2012, p. 1)

14.5.2014

---

(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 51.

1

(2)  Fax +32 22956505.

2

(3)  The measure expires at midnight of the day mentioned in this column.

3

---
§ 161.702 Who will enforce this subpart? ( a ) BIA enforces the provisions of this subpart. If the Navajo Nation adopts the provisions of this subpart, the Navajo Nation will have concurrent jurisdiction to enforce this subpart. Additionally, if the Navajo Nation so requests, BIA will defer to tribal prosecution of trespass on Navajo Partitioned Lands.
( b ) Nothing in this subpart will be construed to diminish the sovereign authority of the Navajo Nation with respect to trespass.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 918 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 918

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase to 100 percent 
  the amount of the deduction for the health insurance costs of self-
                         employed individuals.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 2, 1999

  Mr. Holden introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase to 100 percent 
  the amount of the deduction for the health insurance costs of self-
                         employed individuals.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. INCREASED DEDUCTION FOR HEALTH INSURANCE COSTS OF SELF-
              EMPLOYED INDIVIDUALS.

    (a) In General.--Paragraph (1) of section 162(l) of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 is amended to read as follows:
            ``(1) Allowance of deduction.--In the case of an individual 
        who is an employee within the meaning of section 401(c)(1), 
        there shall be allowed as a deduction under this section an 
        amount equal to 100 percent of the amount paid during the 
        taxable year for insurance which constitutes medical care for 
        the taxpayer, his spouse, and dependents.''
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to taxable years beginning after December 31, 1998.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 166.315 Who is responsible for the completion and maintenance of a conservation practice if the permit expires or is canceled before the completion of the conservation practice?

Prior to undertaking a conservation practice, the BIA, landowner, and permittee will negotiate who will complete and maintain a conservation practice if the permit expires or is canceled before the conservation practice is completed. That conservation practice agreement will be reflected in the conservation plan and permit.
#### § 141.23 Posted statement of ownership.

The licensee of a reservation business shall display in a prominent place a notice that is legible to customers stating the form of the business entity, the names and addresses of all other reservation businesses owned in whole or in part by the business entity, and if the licensee is not a corporation, the names and addresses of the owner or owners of the business. If the licensee is a corporation the notice shall list the names and addresses of the members of the Board of Directors.
§ 162.582 May a lessee mortgage a WSR lease? ( a ) A lessee may mortgage a WSR lease by meeting the consent requirements in § 162.583 and obtaining our approval of the leasehold mortgage under §§ 162.584 and 162.585.
( b ) Refer to § 162.574(c) for information on what happens if a sale or foreclosure under an approved mortgage of the leasehold interest occurs.
§ 162.502 Who must obtain a WEEL or WSR lease? ( a ) Anyone seeking to possess Indian land to conduct activities associated with the evaluation of wind resources must obtain a WEEL, except that a WEEL is not required if use or possession of the Indian land to conduct wind energy evaluation activities is authorized: ( 1 ) Under § 162.005(b);
( 2 ) By a permit from the Indian landowners under § 162.007; or
( 3 ) By a tribe on its land under 25 U.S.C. 81.
( b ) Except as provided in §§ 162.005(b), 162.501, and paragraph (c) of this section, anyone seeking to possess Indian land to conduct activities associated with the development of wind and/or solar resources must obtain a WSR lease.
( c ) A tribe that conducts wind and solar resource activities on its tribal land does not need a WEEL or WSR under this subpart.
#### Luigi A. Rocca, Appellant, v. Francesco Aiello and Joseph Calvosa, Respondents.

Judgment affirmed, with costs, with leave to plaintiff to withdraw demurrer on payment of costs. Ho opinion,
#### § 11.504 Applicable rules of evidence.

Courts of Indian Offenses shall be bound by the Federal Rules of Evidence, except insofar as such rules are superseded by order of the Court of Indian Offenses, or by the existence of inconsistent tribal rules of evidence.
§ 21.10 Sections. ( a ) The normal divisions of a part are sections. Sections are the basic units of the Code.
( b ) When internal division is necessary, a section may be divided into paragraphs, and paragraphs may be further subdivided using the lettering indicated in § 21.11.
#### § 17.2 Procedure and timing for regular schedule.

(a) Each document received shall be filed for public inspection only after it has been received, processed and assigned a publication date.

(b) Except as provided in paragraph (d) of this section, each document received by 2:00 p.m. which meets the requirements of this chapter shall be assigned to the regular schedule. Unless the issuing agency makes special arrangements otherwise, or the Office determines that the document requires a deferred schedule (see 1 CFR 17.7), receipt of a document by 2:00 p.m. is considered to be a request for filing for public inspection and publication on the regular schedule. Documents received after 2:00 p.m. which meet the requirements of this chapter shall be assigned to the next working day's regular schedule.

(c) The regular schedule for filing for public inspection and publication is as follows:

| Received before 2:00 p.m. | Filed for public inspection | Published |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Monday | Wednesday | Thursday |
| Tuesday | Thursday | Friday |
| Wednesday | Friday | Monday |
| Thursday | Monday | Tuesday |
| Friday | Tuesday | Wednesday |

Where a legal Federal holiday intervenes, one additional work day is added.

(d) Each notice of meeting issued under the “Government in the Sunshine Act” (5 U.S.C. 552b(e)(3)) is placed on immediate public inspection after it has been received, processed, and assigned a publication date.

(1) Each notice received before 4:00 p.m. is scheduled to be published 2 working days later.

(2) Each notice received after 4:00 p.m. is scheduled to be published 3 working days later.

[54 FR 9680, Mar. 7, 1989]
#### Isidore Epstein, Plaintiff, v. Hyman Granoff, Defendant.

Motion denied,with costs. Present — Woodward, Jenks, Gaynor, Rich and Miller, JJ.
#### SNAP-ON DRAWER COMPANY, Appellant, v. SNAP-ON TOOLS CORPORATION, Appellee.

No. 11233.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Oct. 13, 1954.

*440Frank Zugelter, Thomas L. Conlon, Cincinnati, Ohio, for appellants.

Harry C. Alberts, Chicago, Ill., Bettinger, Schmitt & Kreis, Cincinnati, Ohio, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Inasmuch as it appears that this court on February 6, 1953, entered an order denying the motion of appellee to dismiss the appeal in this cause on the ground that no steps have been taken to perfect it since August 23, 1950;

And inasmuch as this condition still prevails at this late date, and there is no good reason for permitting the case to continue undisposed of on our docket;

The appeal to this court in this cause is dismissed for want of prosecution.
### **CHAPTER 2001— SPACE FORCE PERSONNEL SYSTEM**

Sec.
20001.
Single military personnel management system.
20002.
Members: duty status.
20003.
Members: minimum service requirement as applied to Space Force.
§ 162.357 May a lessee mortgage a residential lease? ( a ) A lessee may mortgage a residential lease by meeting the consent requirements in § 162.358 and obtaining BIA approval of the leasehold mortgage under in §§ 162.359 and 162.360.
( b ) Refer to § 162.349(b) for information on what happens if a sale or foreclosure under an approved mortgage of the leasehold interest occurs.
# Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas

June 15, 2016

No. 04

- 16

- 00206

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF J.G.A. AND M.A.A., CHILDREN

, From the 73rd Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2015

- PA

- 01023 Honorable Cathleen M. Stryker, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

In this accelerated appeal of the March 22 , 2016 order terminating Appellant’s parental rights, Appellant’s brief was due on May 5 , 2016

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 38.6(a). We granted Appellant’s first and second motion s for extension of time to file the brief ; the brief was due on June 9, 2016 . On the due date, Appellant filed a third motion for extension of time to file the brief until June 17 , 2016. See id. R. 38.6(d). Appellant’s motion is GRANTE D. Appellant’s brief must be filed with this court not later than June 17, 2016. NO FURTHER EXTENSIONS OF TIME TO FILE APPELLANT’S BRIEF WILL BE GRANTED. If counsel cannot file the brief by June 17, 2016, counsel must immediately advise this court of th at inability and this court will issue an appropriate order.
If Appellant fails to file the brief as ordered, we will immediately abate this appeal and remand the cause to the trial court for an abandonment hearing. S ee, e.g. , T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 38.8(b); see also T EX

. F AM

. C ODE A NN

. § 107.013 (West Supp. 2015) (requiring the trial court to appoint counsel to represent an indigent parent in a parental termination case); In re K.S.M. , 61 S.W.3d 632, 633 (Tex. App.

— Tyler 2001, no pet.) (“ Like indigent crimina l appellants, indigent appellants challenging an order terminating their parental rights enjoy a right to counsel on appeal. ”); cf. T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 38.8(b); Samaniego v. State , 952 S.W.2d 50, 52

– 53 (Tex. A pp.

— San Antonio 1997, no pet.).

_________________________________ Patricia O. Alvarez, JusticeIN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 15th day of June, 2016

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle Clerk of Court
Inthe matter of: PLEADING FORM CIVIL PENALTY COMPLAINT U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION

FAADocketNo. FAA-2015-0634 Case No. 2014NM720059 IXL Premium Lubricants, Inc. 

### ) ) ) )
JUDGE RICHARD C. GOODWIN
NOTICE OF APPEARANCE 

## 13 2015

Pursuantto 14 C.F.R. § 13.204(a), Glenn H. Brown, 222 W 7th Ave Box 14, Anchorage, AK 99513; telephone: 907-271-5271; hereby gives notice ofhis appearance in this matter for ComplainantFederal Aviation Administration.
All future pleadings inthis matter mustbe served on him and not the previously assigned attorney, Jeffrey M. Harper.
Datedthis 5th day ofNovember 2015. Peter J. Lynch Assistant ChiefCounsel

for Enforcement 

# C}nc<,

**By:~\~** Glenn H. Brown Enforcement Division, Western Team 222 W 7th Avenue Box 14 Anchorage, AK 99513-7587 email: glenn.brown@faa.gov telephone: (907) 271-5271 (direct) (907) 271-2800 (fax)CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE Re: IXL Premium Lubricants, Inc. FDMS No. FAA-2015-0634
I hereby certify that on this date I have served a copy ofthe foregoing Notice ofAppearance by postage-prepaid, certified mail, return receipt requested and facsimile transmission to the following: The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin U.S. Administrative Law Judge Office ofHearings, M-20 US Department ofTransportation 1200 NewJersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) Washington, DC 20590 Fax: 202-366-7536 Jordan Olsen IXL Premium Lubricants, Inc. 2719 North 1600 West Pleasant View, UT 84404 Fax: 801-731-4499
I further certify that on this date I have served the original and one copy ofthe foregoing Notice ofAppearance bypostage-prepaid, certified mail, return receipt requested and facsimile, addressed as follows: Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 ATTN: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl000 Fax: (202) 493-5020 DATED: 

### I )

Federal Aviation Administration Office ofRegional Counsel 222 West 7thAvenue, Box 14, Anchorage, Alaska 99513-7587 2
#### Montefiore Medical Center, as Assignee of Juan Garcia, Respondent, v Government Employees Insurance Company, Appellant.

[826 NYS2d 616]

In an action to recover no-fault medical payments under an insurance contract, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Bucaria, J.), dated September 15, 2005, which granted the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, and the plaintiffs motion for summary judgment is denied.

Contrary to the Supreme Court’s determination, the defendant’s request for additional verification, which followed the plaintiffs submission of an N-F5 verification, did not have to be set forth in a prescribed form *(see*11 NYCRR 65-3.5 [b]; *Nyack Hosp. v Progressive Cas. Ins. Co.,*296 AD2d 482, 483 [2002]). Therefore, the additional verification request tolled the defendant’s time within which to pay or deny the claim *(see*Insurance Law § 5106 [a]; 11 NYCRR 65-3.8 [a] [1], [2]) until the defendant received all of the relevant information requested *(see Nyack Hosp. v General Motors Acceptance Corp.,*27 AD3d 96, 101 [2005]; *Hospital for Joint Diseases v State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.,*8 AD3d 533, 535 [2004]; *St. Vincent’s Hosp. of Richmond v American Tr. Ins. Co.,*299 AD2d 338, 340 [2002]; *772
      *New York & Presbyt. Hosp. v American Tr. Ins. Co.,*287 AD2d 699, 700 [2001]). Since the defendant sent a partial payment and denial of benefits to the plaintiff after the requested material was provided and within the applicable time period, its response to the claim was not untimely.

Furthermore, the affidavit and documentary evidence submitted by the defendant in opposition to the plaintiffs motion for summary judgment were in admissible form, since the affiant adequately stated her basis of knowledge for the facts asserted in her affidavit and laid a proper foundation for the introduction of the documents. Moreover, those submissions established that other medical providers were properly paid before the plaintiff *(see*11 NYCRR 65-3.15; *Nyack Hosp. v General Motors Acceptance Corp., supra*at 103). However, a triable issue of fact exists as to whether the no-fault benefits under the subject policy were exhausted, since the affidavit of the defendant’s employee indicates that they were, but the payment register maintained by the defendant in the regular course of business reveals a balance of no-fault benefits in excess of the amount billed by the plaintiff. Accordingly, determination of the issue of whether the policy limits were in fact exhausted before full payment could be made to the plaintiff must await further proceedings.

The plaintiffs remaining contentions are without merit. Adams, J.E, Ritter, Mastro and Lifson, JJ., concur.
### §1795. Parent partnerships with child development centers

(a) Parent Boards.—The Secretary of Defense shall require that there be established at each military child development center a board of parents, to be composed of parents of children attending the center. The board shall meet periodically with staff of the center and the commander of the installation served by the center for the purpose of discussing problems and concerns. The board, together with the staff of the center, shall be responsible for coordinating the parent participation program described in subsection (b).

(b) Parent Participation Programs.—The Secretary of Defense shall require the establishment of a parent participation program at each military child development center. As part of such program, the Secretary of Defense may establish fees for attendance of children at such a center, in the case of parents who participate in the parent participation program at that center, at rates lower than the rates that otherwise apply.

(Added Pub. L. 104–106, div. A, title V, §568(a)(1), Feb. 10, 1996, 110 Stat. 334.)
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# U.S. Army Japan Hosts Inaugural Women, Peace and Security Symposium  

By Sean KimmonsU.S. Army Garrison Japan Public Affairs

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More
#### § 11.420 Tampering with records.

A person commits a misdemeanor if, knowing that he or she has no privilege to do so, he or she falsifies, destroys, removes or conceals any writing or record, with purpose to deceive or injure anyone or to conceal any wrongdoing.
### §1446. Restriction on participation

(a) Notwithstanding section 1441 of this title, if a person—

(1) has made an election under this subchapter; and

(2) is retired for physical disability before he completes 19 years of service for which he is entitled to credit in the computation of his basic pay;

and thereafter dies, his beneficiaries are not entitled to the annuities provided under this subchapter until they give proof to the department concerned that they are not eligible for benefits under chapter 11 or 13 of title 38. If the beneficiaries are not eligible for benefits under chapter 11 or 13 of title 38, the annuity shall begin on the first day of the month in which the death occurs.

(b) Whenever the beneficiaries on whose behalf the election was made are restricted, under subsection (a), from participating in the annuities provided under this subchapter, the amount withheld from the elector's retired or retainer pay as a result of an election under this subchapter shall be refunded to the beneficiaries, less the amount of any annuities paid under this subchapter, and in either case without interest.

(Added Pub. L. 87–381, §6(1), Oct. 4, 1961, 75 Stat. 811; amended Pub. L. 90–485, §1(8), Aug. 13, 1968, 82 Stat. 754; Pub. L. 92–425, §1(2)(A), Sept. 21, 1972, 86 Stat. 706.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1972—Pub. L. 92–425 substituted "subchapter" for "chapter" wherever appearing.

1968—Subsec. (a)(2). Pub. L. 90–485 substituted "19" for "18".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1968 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 90–485 effective on first day of third calendar month following Aug. 13, 1968, see section 6 of Pub. L. 90–485, set out as a note under section 1431 of this title.