alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Nimitz Completes At-Sea Ammunition Onload

By USS Nimitz (CVN 68) Public Affairs 

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More News/Articles
EXHIBIT 32
Section 1350 Certifications

                          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                           18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                           AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Report of Bravo! Foods International, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Roy G. Warren, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C., Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


                                       /S/ Roy G. Warren
                                       -----------------------
                                       Roy G. Warren
                                       Chief Executive Officer

November 13, 2003


<PAGE>


                          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                           18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                           AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Report of Bravo! Foods International, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Tommy E. Kee, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C., Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

November 13, 2003                      /S/ Tommy E. Kee
                                       -----------------------
                                       Tommy E. Kee
                                       Chief Financial Officer


<PAGE>
### §1173. Enlisted members: discharge for hardship

Under regulations prescribed by the Secretary concerned, a regular enlisted member of an armed force who has dependents may be discharged for hardship.

(Added Pub. L. 93–64, title I, §102, July 9, 1973, 87 Stat. 147.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective July 1, 1973, see section 206 of Pub. L. 93–64, set out as a note under section 401 of Title 37, Pay and Allowances of the Uniformed Services.
#### WENDY DAVIS TRAPANI *v.*PAUL SCARCELLA ET AL.

Decided July 16, 2004

*John R. Williams,*in support of the petition.

*Ralph W. Johnson III*and *Robert A. Rhodes,*in opposition.

The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 83 Conn. App. 903 (AC 24465), is denied.
Exhibit 13.2 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED 

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

The undersigned, who is carrying out the functions of chief financial officer for Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. (the “Partnership”) pursuant to the Master Services Agreement, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, (i) the annual report of the Partnership on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016 (the “Annual Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and (ii) the information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership. 

Dated: February 28, 2017

 

|   | */s/*Nicholas Goodman                  |
|--------|----------------------------------------|
|   | Nicholas Goodman                       |
|   | Chief Financial Officer of the Service |
|   | Provider, BRP Energy Group L.P.        |
|   |                                   |

 

- 1 -*** ***

----
### §1064. Use of commissary stores and MWR retail facilities: members of National Guard serving in federally declared disaster or national emergency

(a) Eligibility of Members.—A member of the National Guard who, although not in Federal service, is called or ordered to duty in response to a federally declared disaster or national emergency shall be permitted to use commissary stores and MWR retail facilities during the period of such duty on the same basis as members of the armed forces on active duty.

(b) Eligibility of Dependents.—A dependent of a member of the National Guard who is permitted under subsection (a) to use commissary stores and MWR retail facilities shall be permitted to use such stores and facilities, during the same period as the member, on the same basis as dependents of members of the armed forces on active duty.

(c) Definitions.—In this section:

(1) Federally declared disaster.—The term "federally declared disaster" means a disaster or other situation for which a Presidential declaration of major disaster is issued under section 401 of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5170).

(2) MWR retail facilities.—The term "MWR retail facilities" has the meaning given that term in section 1063(e) 1 of this title.

(3) National emergency.—The term "national emergency" means a national emergency declared by the President or Congress.

(Added Pub. L. 105–261, div. A, title III, §362(c), Oct. 17, 1998, 112 Stat. 1985, §1063a; amended Pub. L. 107–314, div. A, title III, §322(a), (b)(1), Dec. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 2510; renumbered §1064 and amended Pub. L. 108–136, div. A, title VI, §651(b)(2), (3), Nov. 24, 2003, 117 Stat. 1521.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Section 1063(e) of this title, referred to in subsec. (c)(2), was redesignated section 1063(f) of this title by Pub. L. 118–31, div. A, title XVII, 1722(h)(2), Dec. 22, 2023, 137 Stat. 672.

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 1064, added Pub. L. 101–510, div. A, title III, §321(b), Nov. 5, 1990, 104 Stat. 1528; amended Pub. L. 104–106, div. A, title XV, §1501(c)(8), Feb. 10, 1996, 110 Stat. 499; Pub. L. 105–261, div. A, title III, §362(b), (d)(2), Oct. 17, 1998, 112 Stat. 1984, 1985, related to use of commissary stores by persons qualified for retired pay but under age 60, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 108–136, div. A, title VI, §651(b)(1), Nov. 24, 2003, 117 Stat. 1521.

#### Amendments

2003—Pub. L. 108–136, §651(b)(3), renumbered section 1063a of this title as this section.

Subsec. (c)(2). Pub. L. 108–136, §651(b)(2), substituted "section 1063(e)" for "section 1065(e)".

2002—Pub. L. 107–314, §322(b)(1), inserted "or national emergency" after "disaster" in section catchline.

Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 107–314, §322(a)(1), inserted "or national emergency" after "disaster".

Subsec. (c)(3). Pub. L. 107–314, §322(a)(2), added par. (3).

1 See References in text note below.
A Federal Advisory Committee for th e U.S. Environmental Protection Agency ’sOffice of Research and Development January 1 9 , 20 10 43 rd EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE FACE - TO -FACE MEETING

DRAFT AGENDA February 4 - 5 , 20 10 Marriott at Metro Center 775 12th Street, NW Washington, DC 20005 Phone: (202) 737 -2200 Thursday, February 4, 2010 8 : 3 0 a.m. – 9 : 00 a.m. Registration 9 : 00 a.m. – 9 : 15 a.m. Welcome and Introductions Dr. Gary S. Sayler, Chair,

- Review of September Executive Committee Meeting Minutes

- Overview of Agenda 9 : 1 5 a .m. – 9 : 3 0 a .m. BOSC DFO Remarks Mr . Greg Susanke , Designated

- Administrative Issues Federal Officer (DFO), Office of Research and Development (ORD) 9 : 3 0 a .m. – 10 : 0 0 a .m. ORD Update Dr. Kevin Teichman, Deputy Assistant Administrator for Science for ORD 10 : 0 0 a.m.

– 10: 3 0 a.m. AA/ORD Remarks Dr. Paul Anastas, Assistant Administrator for ORD 10: 3 0 a.m. – 1 0 : 45 a.m. Break 1 0 : 45 a.m. – 11: 00 a.m. Subcommittee Updates

- Drinking Water Program Review Dr. Chuck Haas, Subcommittee Chair

- Global Change Program Review Dr. Henry Falk, Subcommittee Vice Chair 1 1 : 0 0 a.m. – 1 2: 0 0 p.m. Computational Toxicology Dr. Dennis Paustenbach, Chair, Letter Report CompTox Subcommittee

- Presentation

- DiscussionDraft Agenda for February 4 - 5, 2010 Executive Committee Meeting



### 2 12: 0 0 p.m.

– 1: 0 0 p.m. Lunch 1:00 p.m.

– 1:30 p.m. EPA Science Advisory Board Dr. Vanessa Vu, (SAB) Activities Director SAB 1 : 3 0 p .m. – 2 : 3 0 p .m. Decision Analysis Workgroup Report Dr. Katherine von Stackelberg, Workgroup Chair, Executive Committee 

### 2 : 3 0 p .m. – 2 : 4 5 p.m. Break 2 : 4 5 p.m. – 3 : 15 p.m. Internal Office of Science Policy Dr. Lawrence Martin, OSP, (OSP) Assessment of BOSC Research ORD Program Reviews 3 : 15 p.m. – 3 : 45 p.m. Program Review Process: Mr. Greg Susanke, DFO, ORD Recommendations and Changes 3:45 p.m.

– 4:30 p.m. Subcommittee Charge Question Mr. Greg Susanke, DFO, ORD Revisions 4: 3 0 p.m.

– 5:00 p . m. BOSC Guidance for Development Mr. Greg Susanke, DFO, ORD of Program Review Reports and Mid-Cycle Review Reports 5:00 p.m. Recess Friday, February 5, 2010 8:3 0 a .m. – 9:3 0 a .m. ORD Response to Clean Air Report Dr. Dan Costa, National Program Director, Clean Air Research Program 

### 9 :30 a.m.

– 10 : 3 0 a.m. Executive Committee Open Forum: Dr. Gary Sayler, Chair, Roles and Issues Executive Committee 10 :30 a.m.

– 10 : 45 a.m. Public Comment 10 : 45 a.m. – 1 1 : 00 a.m. Break 11: 00 a .m. – 12:00 p.m. Future Discussion/Future Business Dr. Gary Sayler, Chair,

- EC Meetings in 2010 Executive Committee

- Future Work 12 : 00 p.m. Adjourn
#### § 1200.19 How can the plan be revised?

Once a tribe has withdrawn its funds, the tribe may revise its plan without our approval. All revisions should conform to the procedures outlined in the approved management plan. The tribe should inform its members of all revisions to a plan through normal tribal procedures before the revisions are implemented.
Exhibit 32.1





Certification of CEOs and CFO


Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002




In connection with the Annual Report of Just Energy Group Inc. (the "Registrant") filed under cover of Form 40-F for the year ended March 31, 2016, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), James Lewis and Deborah Merril, as Co-Chief Executive Officers of the Registrant, and Patrick McCullough, as Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as enacted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of our knowledge, that:




(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Registrant.







/s/ James LewisBy:
James LewisTitle:
Co-Chief Executive OfficerDate:
June 2, 2016/s/ Deborah MerrilBy:
Deborah MerrilTitle:
Co-Chief Executive OfficerDate:
June 2, 2016/s/ Patrick McCulloughBy:
Patrick McCulloughTitle:
Chief Financial OfficerDate:
June 2, 2016





This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Registrant for purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
### SUBCHAPTER VI—LIMITATIONS ON USE OF DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE FUNDS

Sec.
361.
Prohibition on providing financial assistance to terrorist countries.
362.
Prohibition on use of funds for assistance to units of foreign security forces that have committed a gross violation of human rights.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# 15th Wing, JASDF Increase Interoperability during First Bilateral Exercise

By Senior Airman Makensie Cooper

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More
IB

House Calendar No. 185

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 938

[Report No. 106–537]

To designate the Federal building located at 290 Broadway in New York,

New York, as the ‘‘Ronald H. Brown Federal Building’’.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 2, 1999

Mr. RANGEL (for himself, Ms. WATERS, Mr. JACKSON of Illinois, Ms. JACKSON-LEE of Texas, Mrs. MEEK of Florida, Mr. PALLONE, Mr. NADLER,

Ms. LEE, Mr. NEAL of Massachusetts, Mr. FALEOMAVAEGA, Ms. CARSON, Mr. RUSH, Mr. SNYDER, Mr. DEFAZIO, Mr. MATSUI, Mr. DIXON,

Mr. FORD, Mr. MOAKLEY, Ms. NORTON, Mr. CUMMINGS, Mr. FRANK of

Massachusetts, Mr. LEWIS of Georgia, Mr. PAYNE, Mr. COYNE, Mr. CONYERS, Mr. ENGEL, Mr. JEFFERSON, Mr. CLAY, Mr. SCOTT, Mr. BROWN

of California, Mr. GEJDENSON, Mr. KENNEDY of Rhode Island, Mrs.

CLAYTON, Mr. ACKERMAN, Mr. MEEKS of New York, Mr. LEVIN, Mr.

MCGOVERN, Mrs. MINK of Hawaii, Mr. WATT of North Carolina, Mr.

QUINN, Mr. SABO, Mr. KUCINICH, Mr. UNDERWOOD, Ms. BROWN of

Florida, Mr. LAFALCE, Ms. KILPATRICK, Mrs. MALONEY of New York,

Mr. PORTMAN, Mr. FROST, Mr. BRADY of Pennsylvania, Mrs. JONES of

Ohio, Mr. WATTS of Oklahoma, Mr. WAXMAN, Mr. CROWLEY, and Mr.

ETHERIDGE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

MARCH 23, 2000

Additional sponsors: Mr. MCNULTY, Mr. SANDLIN, Mr. PASTOR, Ms.

DELAURO, Mr. WYNN, and Mr. BONIOR

MARCH 23, 2000

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed
2

•HR 938 RH

A BILL

To designate the Federal building located at 290 Broadway

in New York, New York, as the ‘‘Ronald H. Brown

Federal Building’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

4 The Federal building located at 290 Broadway in

5 New York, New York, shall be known and designated as

6 the ‘‘Ronald H. Brown Federal Building’’.

7 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

8 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

9 paper, or other record of the United States to the building

10 referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference

11 to the ‘‘Ronald H. Brown Federal Building’’.

House Calendar No. 185

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 938

[Report No. 106–537]

A BILL

To designate the Federal building located at 290

Broadway in New York, New York, as the ‘‘Ronald H. Brown Federal Building’’.

MARCH 23, 2000

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be

printed
[No. 28396.

Department One.

June 16, 1941.]

#### Seattle Export Lumber Company, *Appellant,*v. The State of Washington, *Respondent.*
      *1*

*Robert B. Lytel*and *Solie M. Ringold,*for appellant.

*The Attorney General*and *John E. Belcher, Assistant,*for respondent.

Reported in 114 P. (2d) 525.

Per Curiam. —

This is a companion case to *Donovan Lumber Co. v. State, ante*p. 242, 114 P. (2d) 524. In no essential respect are the facts in this case different from those in that. The judgment is, therefore, affirmed.
### Geology and ore deposits of the Cachoeira do Campo, Dom Bosco, and Ouro Branco quadrangles, Minas Gerais, Brazil

By: R.F. Johnson

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/pp341B

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf) 
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
#### Maria Hilliard, Impleaded, etc. *v.*James W. Scoville *et al.*

1. *Partition—who entitled thereto.*One tenant in common may sue out a writ of partition, even though there be a subsisting life estate in another in the premises, notwithstanding the objection of the owner of the *450life estate; and, in case partition can not be made, he may obtain an order for the sale of the whole of the premises, subject to the life estate.

2. And though the premises may sell for less by reason of the life estate in them, that is no reason why either of the remainder-men should be delayed in proceeding to sever the tenancy, as between themselves.

Appeal from the Superior Court of Chicago; the Hon. Joseph E. Gary, Chief Justice, presiding.

This case was before this court at the September term, 1868, and will be found reported in 48 Ill. 453, where a full statement of the case, as presented at that time, will be found in the opinion of the court. The additional facts appearing on the second hearing below are presented in the opinion.

Messrs. Hervey, Anthohy & Galt, for the appellant.

As the court did not decide, in the other case, that a sale could be decreed, but only a partition could be made, and that, because the owner of the life estate did not appear to object, we submit again the question to the court, that a sale of this undivided property can not be decreed against the objection of the owner of the life estate, and against the objection of the appellant, who owns two-thirds of the property, and again cite the following *cases—Culver*v. Culver, 2 Root, 278; *Nichols*v. *Nichols,*28 Vermont, 228; *Nichols*v. *Nichols,*ib. 658—in support of our position.

Mr. George Scoville, for the appellees.

Per Curiam :

When this case was before us at the last term, we fully considered all the authorities cited, supposed to bear upon the case, and we reached the conclusion there was no reason why one tenant in common might not sue out a writ of partition, even though there was a subsisting life estate in another in the premises.

*451By the record now before us, it appears the owner of the life interest objected to the partition, notwithstanding which, the court allowed the partition, and appointed commissioners to divide the lot. The commissioners reported partition could not be made, whereupon a sale of the lot was ordered, subject to the life estate.

This order was a natural and legal sequence of the decision of this court, and was proper. The owner of the life estate can not be injured by a sale, nor can the tenants in common. Either of them can become the purchaser, and so may the tenant for life. But, independent of this consideration, there can be no legal impediment to the sale, if a partition can not be made. Though the premises may sell for less by reason of the life estate in them, that is no reason why either of the remainder-men should be delayed in proceeding to sever the tenancy as between themselves. The sooner it is severed the better it would appear to be for all parties.

The judgment of the court below is affirmed.

*Judgment affirmed.*