alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[115th Congress Public Law 69]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

[[Page 131 STAT. 1207]]

Public Law 115-69
115th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To require the Administrator of the Federal Emergency Management Agency 
   to submit a report regarding certain plans regarding assistance to 
     applicants and grantees during the response to an emergency or 
            disaster. <<NOTE: Oct. 18, 2017 -  [H.R. 1117]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. ACTION PLAN TO IMPROVE FIELD TRANSITION.

    (a) In General.--Not later than 90 days after the date of enactment 
of this Act, the Administrator of the Federal Emergency Management 
Agency (FEMA) shall report to the Committee on Transportation and 
Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and the Committee on 
Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs of the Senate regarding the 
plans the agency will undertake to provide the following:
            (1) Consistent guidance to applicants on FEMA disaster 
        funding procedures during the response to an emergency or 
        disaster.
            (2) Appropriate record maintenance and transfer of documents 
        to new teams during staff transitions.
            (3) Accurate assistance to applicants and grantees to ease 
        the administrative burden throughout the process of obtaining 
        and monitoring assistance.

    (b) Maintaining Records.--The report shall also include a plan for 
implementing operating procedures and document retention requirements to 
ensure the maintenance of appropriate records throughout the lifecycle 
of the emergency or disaster.
    (c) New Technologies.--Finally, the report shall identify new 
technologies that further aid the disaster workforce in partnering with 
State, local, and tribal governments and private nonprofits in the wake 
of a disaster or emergency to educate, assist, and inform applicants on 
the status of their emergency or disaster assistance applications and 
projects.

    Approved October 18, 2017.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 1117:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 115-31 (Comm. on Transportation and Infrastructure).
SENATE REPORTS: No. 115-158 (Comm. on Homeland Security and Governmental 
Affairs).
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 163 (2017):
            Mar. 27, considered and passed House.
            Oct. 4, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
§ 11.410 Criminal mischief. ( a ) A person is guilty of criminal mischief if he or she: ( 1 ) Damages tangible property of another purposely, recklessly, or by negligence in the employment of fire, explosives, or other dangerous means; or
( 2 ) Purposely or recklessly tampers with tangible property of another so as to endanger person or property; or
( 3 ) Purposely or recklessly causes another to suffer pecuniary loss by deception or threat.
( b ) Criminal mischief is a misdemeanor if the actor purposely causes pecuniary loss in excess of $100, or a petty misdemeanor if he or she purposely or recklessly causes pecuniary loss in excess of $25. Otherwise, criminal mischief is a violation.
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.



## United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2008-1205

CELERITY, INC.,

Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant-Appellee,

v.

ULTRA CLEAN TECHNOLOGY SYST EMS AND SERVICE, INC.,

Defendant/Counterclaimant-Appellant,

and

ULTRA CLEAN HOLDINGS, INC.,

Defendant-Appellant.

Keith L. Slenkovich , Thelen LLP, of San Jo se, California, argued for

plaintiff/counterclaim defendant-appellee. With him on the brief were Robert E. Camors, Jr.

, Christopher L. Ogden

, Karin M. Frenza , and Tomomi K. Harkey

.

Paul J. Andre , King & Spalding LLP, of Redwood Shores, California, argued for

defendant/counterclaimant-appellant and defendant-appellant. With him on the brief were

Lisa Kobialka and Amy Sun

.

Appealed from: United States District Cour t for the Northern District of California

Judge Maxine M. ChesneyNOTE: This dispositio n is nonprecedential.



## United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2008-1205

CELERITY, INC.,

Plaintiff/Counterclaim DefendantAppellee,

v.

ULTRA CLEAN TECHNOLOGY SYST EMS AND SERVICE, INC.,

Defendant/CounterclaimantAppellant,

and

ULTRA CLEAN HOLDINGS, INC.,

Defendant-Appellant.



## Judgment

ON APPEAL from the United States Distr ict Court for the Northern District of

California

in CASE NO(S). 05-CV-4374 and 05-CV-3560

This CAUSE having been hear d and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Per Curiam (GAJARSA, DYK, and MOORE, Circuit Judges ).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

DATED: October 9, 2008 / s / Jan Horbaly

Jan Horbaly, Clerk
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

# PACFLT Commander Conducts All Hands Call in Singapore 

By Mass Communication Specialist 1st Class Jay C. PughCommander, Task Force 73 Public Affairs

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

USPACOM

News Article

Adm. Harry Harris Jr.
#### § 115.904 Where earnest money is paid prior to Secretarial approval of a conveyance or contract instrument involving trust assets, may the BIA deposit that earnest money into a special deposit account?

No, any money received prior to Secretarial approval of conveyance or contract instrument involving trust assets must be deposited into a non-interest bearing, non-trust account. After the Secretary approves the conveyance or contract instrument involving trust assets, the money designated by the conveyance or contract instrument will be deposited into a trust fund account.
GraphPad Statistical Analysis. 

Raw data for Control Rats killed at 1800 h 

Analaysis says that the three control groups were not statistically different. 

Page 1 of 3 

Analaysis says that the three control groups were not statistically different. 
Print Out. Analysis 

Parameter Value Block 2 Block 3 

Table Analyzed 

1800h Serum LH of control rats 

One-way analysis of variance 

 P value 0.3347 

 P value summary ns 

 Are means signif. different? (P < 0.05) No 

 Number of groups 3 

 F 1.146 

 R squared 0.08718 

 

Bartlett's test for equal variances 

 Bartlett's statistic (corrected) 2.046 

 P value 0.3595 

 P value summary ns 

 Do the variances differ signif. (P < 0.05) No 

 

ANOVA Table SS df MS 

 Treatment (between columns) 86.84 2 43.42 

 Residual (within columns) 909.3 24 37.89 

 Total 996.1 26 

 

Tukey's Multiple Comparison Test Mean Diff. q P value 95% CI of diff 

 Block 1 vs Block 2 3.872 1.779 P > 0.05 -3.814 to 11.56 

 Block 1 vs Block 3 3.966 1.961 P > 0.05 -3.177 to 11.11 

 Block 2 vs Block 3 0.09341 0.04619 P > 0.05 -7.050 to 7.237 
1800h Serum LH of control rats

Block 1 Block 2 Block 3

0

10

20

30

LH (ng/mL)
# C_2013015EN.01001101.xml

| 18.1.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 15/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.1.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 15/11

---

Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries

2013/C 15/07

In accordance with Article 35(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), a decision has been taken to close the fishery as set down in the following table:

1

| Date and time of closure | 19.12.2012 |
| --- | --- |
| Duration | 19.12.2012-31.12.2012 |
| Member State | Portugal |
| Stock or group of stocks | BSF/8910- |
| Species | Black scabbardfish (Aphanopus carbo) |
| Zone | EU and international waters of VIII, IX and X |
| Type(s) of fishing vessels | — |
| Reference number | FS85DSS |

Date and time of closure

19.12.2012

Duration

19.12.2012-31.12.2012

Member State

Portugal

Stock or group of stocks

BSF/8910-

Species

Black scabbardfish (Aphanopus carbo)

Aphanopus carbo

Zone

EU and international waters of VIII, IX and X

Type(s) of fishing vessels

—

Reference number

FS85DSS

---

(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.

1

---
#### § 1000.49 Who can apply for an advance planning grant?

Any Tribe/Consortium that is not a self-governance Tribe and needs advance funding to complete the planning phase requirement may apply. Tribes/Consortia that have received a planning grant within 3 years preceding the date of the latest Federal Register announcement are not eligible.
§ 162.585 How will BIA decide whether to approve a leasehold mortgage of a WSR lease? ( a ) We may disapprove a leasehold mortgage of a WSR lease only if at least one of the following is true: ( 1 ) The Indian landowners have not consented and their consent is required;
( 2 ) The lessee's mortgagees or sureties have not consented;
( 3 ) The requirements of this subpart have not been met; or
( 4 ) We find a compelling reason to withhold our approval in order to protect the best interests of the Indian landowners.
( b ) In making the finding required by paragraph (a)(4) of this section, we may consider whether: ( 1 ) The leasehold mortgage proceeds would be used for purposes unrelated to the leased premises; and
( 2 ) The leasehold mortgage is limited to the leasehold.
( c ) We will defer, to the maximum extent possible, to the Indian landowners' determination that the leasehold mortgage is in their best interest.
( d ) We may not unreasonably withhold approval of a leasehold mortgage.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

# Orient Shield 14 begins with a Bang

By 1st Lt. Amy Hanna

                CAMP HIGASHI-CHITOSE-Japan  –              

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

pacom

news

articles
§ 170.912 Does Indian employment preference apply to Federal-aid Highway Projects? ( a ) Tribal, State, and local governments may provide an Indian employment preference for Indians living on or near a reservation on projects and contracts that meet the definition of a Tribal transportation facility. (See 23 U.S.C. 101(a)(12) and 140(d), and 23 CFR 635.117(d).)
( b ) Tribes may target recruiting efforts toward Indians living on or near Indian reservations, Tribal lands, Alaska Native villages, pueblos, and Indian communities.
( c ) Tribes and Tribal employment rights offices should work cooperatively with State and local governments to develop contract provisions promoting employment opportunities for Indians on eligible federally funded transportation projects. Tribal, State, and local representatives should confer to establish Indian employment goals for these projects.
Page 1 of 1 UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTA L PROTECTION A GENCY

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460

OFFICE OF POLICY

M EMORANDUM SUBJECT: Transmittal to Docket: Summary o f t he March 1 5 , 2011, Public Meeting

with Tribal Leaders in Denver, Colorado , regarding the Environmental Protection Agency’s Implementation of Executive Order 13563: Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review FROM: Stuart C. Miles - McLean

Office of Regulatory Policy and Management TO: Public Docket #EPA - HQ - OA - 2011 - 0156: Im proving Regulations: General As called for b y President Obama in Executive Order 13563, "to facilitate the periodic review of existing significant regulations," the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is considering "how best to promote retrospective analy sis of rules that may be outmoded, ineffective, insufficient, or excessively burdensome, and to modify , streamline, expand, or repeal them in accordance with what has been learned." As part of its retrospectiv e review of regulatio ns, EPA convened public meetings around the country to gather input on how we might design the plan we will use to periodicall y review our regulations. T his Memo transmits to the docket a summary of the public meeting with tribal lead ers held on March 1 5 , 2011, in Denver, Colorado
.
§ 1000.392 How does the Freedom of Information Act apply? ( a ) Access to records maintained by the Secretary is governed by the Freedom of Information Act (5 U.S.C. 552) and other applicable Federal law.
( b ) At the option of the Tribe/Consortium under section 108 of the Pub. L. 93-638, except for previously provided copies of Tribe/Consortium records that the Secretary demonstrates are clearly required to be maintained as part of the record keeping system of the Department of the Interior, records of the Tribe/Consortium shall not be considered Federal records for the purpose of the Freedom of Information Act.
( c ) The Freedom of Information Act does not apply to records maintained solely by Tribes/Consortia.
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION  PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT  TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY  ACT OF 2002





In connection  with the Quarterly Report of FW Preferred Capital Trust I (the Capital Trust)  on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 26, 2004, as filed with the Securities  and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I Brian K. Ferraioli  as Vice President and Controller of Foster Wheeler LLC, as sponsor, certify  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1) The Report  fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2) The  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,  the financial condition and results of the operations of the Capital Trust.





|Date: May    14, 2004 |                                                                      
|--------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------
|                      |                                                                      
|                      | /s/ BRIAN K. FERRAIOLI                                               
|                      | Brian K.    Ferraioli                                                
|                      | Vice    President and Controller of    Foster Wheeler LLC, as Sponsor
| **Accounts Receivable - Textual (Details)**                                          | Dec. 31, 2011 | Dec. 31, 2010 |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------|---------------|
| **Accounts Receivable (Textual) (Abstract)**                                         |          |          |
| Allowance for Doubtful Accounts as a Percentage of Total Patient Accounts Receivable | 9.20%         | 10.30%        |

| X                                                                                                                                                             |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - Details**Name:**hls_AccountsReceivableTextualAbstract**Namespace Prefix:**hls_**Data Type:**xbrli:stringItemType**Balance Type:**na**Period Type:**duration |
| X                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - Definition
Allowance for doubtful accounts expressed as a percentage of gross patient accounts receivable.
+ References
No definition available.
+ Details**Name:**hls_AllowanceForDoubtfulAccountsAsPercentageOfPatientAccountsReceivable**Namespace Prefix:**hls_**Data Type:**num:percentItemType**Balance Type:**na**Period Type:**instant |
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 03-917 

________________________________________________________________________ 

INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT 

Article 98 

 Agreement between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and COLOMBIA 

Signed at Bogota September 17, 2003 

 

 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
COLOMBIA 

International Criminal Court: Article 98 

Agreement signed at Bogota September 17, 2003; 

 Entered into force September 17, 2003.
#### § 162.339 Will BIA review a proposed residential lease before or during preparation of the NEPA review documentation?

Upon request of the Indian landowners, we will review the proposed residential lease after negotiation by the parties, before or during preparation of the NEPA review documentation and any valuation. Within 10 days of receiving the proposed lease, we will provide an acknowledgement of the terms of the lease and identify any provisions that, based on this acknowledgment review, would justify disapproval of the lease, pending results of the NEPA review and any valuation.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration

          - [Docket No. FMCSA-2011-0022]

# AGENCY:

Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA), DOT.

# ACTION:

Notice of application for exemption; request for comments; correction.

# SUMMARY:

                        This document corrects the docket number for FMCSA's notice of                               ( print page 9854)                            application for exemption on Parts and Accessories Necessary for Safe Operation; Brakes; Application for Exemption From Innovative Electronics published in the                         **Federal Register**                         of February 10, 2011.                    

# DATES:

Comments must be received on or before March 14, 2011.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Mr. Luke W. Loy, Vehicle and Roadside Operations Division, Office of Bus and Truck Standards and Operations, MC-PSV, (202) 366-0676; Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590-0001.

## Correction

The following correction is made to the Parts and Accessories Necessary for Safe Operation; Brakes; Application for Exemption From Innovative Electronics; Notice of application for exemption; request for comments (76 FR 7623, February 10, 2011), in FR Doc 2011-2985 on page 7623, third column, correct Docket No. FMCSA-2010-0022 to Docket No. FMCSA-2011-0022.

Issued On: February 11, 2011.

Larry W. Minor,

Associate Administrator for Policy. 

[FR Doc. 2011-3896 Filed 2-18-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-EX-P
§ 161.500 May permits be transferred, assigned or modified? ( a ) Grazing permits may be transferred, assigned, or modified only as provided in this section. Permits may only be transferred or assigned as a single permit under Navajo Nation procedures and with the approval of BIA. Permittees must reside within the same range unit as the original permittee.
( b ) Permits may be transferred, assigned, or modified with the written consent of the permittee, District Grazing Committee and/or Resources Committee and approved by BIA.
( c ) BIA must record each transfer, assignment, or modification that it approves under a permit.