alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

# Appointment of Ambassador Elizabeth Jones as Chargé d’Affaires ad interim at Embassy New Delhi 

U.S. Embassy & Consulates in India

U.S. Embassy & Consulates in India -- Appointment of Ambassador Elizabeth Jones as Chargé d’Affaires ad interim at Embassy New DelhiAmbassador Elizabeth Jones will be departing for New Delhi to serve as Chargé d’Affaires, ad interim. She recently served as the Coordinator for Afghan Relocation Efforts. She previously served as Assistant Secretary of State for Europe and Eurasia, acting Assistant Secretary of State for the Near East, and Ambassador to Kazakhstan. Ambassador Jones carries the highest Foreign Service rank of Career Ambassador.In India, Ambassador Jones will join our Embassy and Consulate interagency teams in advancing and expanding the partnership between our governments and people, a partnership that Secretary Blinken has called one of the most consequential in the world.

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More
§ 101.15 Penalties on default. Unless otherwise provided in the loan agreement between the United States and a borrower, failure on the part of a borrower to conform to the terms of the loan agreement will be deemed grounds for the taking of any one or all of the following steps by the Commissioner: ( a ) Discontinue any further advance of funds contemplated by the loan agreement.
( b ) Take possession of any or all collateral given as security and in the case of individuals, corporation, partnerships or cooperative associations, the property purchased with the borrowed funds.
( c ) Prosecute legal action against the borrower or against officers of corporations, tribes, bands, credit associations, cooperative associations, and other organizations.
( d ) Declare the entire amount advanced immediately due and payable.
( e ) Prevent further disbursement of credit funds under the control of the borrower.
( f ) Withdraw any unobligated funds from the borrower.
( g ) Require relending organizations conducting a relending program to apply all collections on loans to liquidate the debt to the United States.
( h ) Take possession of the assets of a relending organization conducting a relending program and exercise or arrange to exercise its powers until the Commissioner has received acceptable assurance of its repayment of the revolving loan and compliance with the provisions of the terms of the loan agreement.
( i ) Liquidate, operate or arrange for the operation of economic enterprises financed with revolving loans made to individuals, tribes, corporations, partnerships and cooperative associations until the indebtedness is paid or until the Commissioner has received acceptable assurance of its repayment and compliance with the terms of the loan agreement.
( j ) Report the name and account information of a delinquent borrower to a credit bureau.
( k ) Assess additional interest and penalty charges for the period of time that payment is not made.
( l ) Assess charges to cover additional administrative costs incurred by the Government to service the account.
( m ) Offset amounts owed the borrower under other Federal programs including other programs administered by the Bureau of Indian Affairs.
( n ) Refer the account to a private collection agency to collect the amount due.
( o ) Refer the account to the U.S. Department of Justice for collection by litigation.
( p ) If the borrower is a current or retired Federal employee, take action to offset the borrower's salary or civil service retirement benefits.
( q ) Refer the debt to the Internal Revenue Service for offset against any amount owed the borrower as an income tax refund.
( r ) Report any written-off debt to the Internal Revenue Service as taxable income to the borrower.
( s ) Recommend suspension or debarment from conducting further business with the Federal Government.
[40 FR 3587, Jan. 23, 1975. Redesignated at 47 FR 13327, Mar. 30, 1982, as amended at 57 FR 46472, Oct. 8, 1992]
Exhibit
32





CERTIFICATIONS
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Ridgewood Electric Power
Trust V (the “Trust”) for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2009, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
each of the undersigned officers of the Trust hereby certifies, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. (section) 1350, as adopted pursuant to (section) 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Trust.








/s/
      Randall D. HolmesName:
            Randall
      D. HolmesTitle:
            President
      and Chief Executive Officer
              (Principal
      Executive Officer)Date:
            November
      10, 2009








/s/
      Jeffrey H. StrasbergName:
            Jeffrey
      H. StrasbergTitle:
            Executive
      Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
              (Principal
      Financial and Accounting Officer)Date:
            November
      10, 2009
Exhibit 8.1



Subsidiaries of Can-Fite BioPharma Ltd.



The following table sets forth the name and jurisdiction of
incorporation of our subsidiaries as of March 26, 2014.



|                                                             |  | Jurisdiction of  
|------------------------------------------------------------ |  | -----------------
|Name of Subsidiary                                           |  | Incorporation    
|                                                             |  |                  
|OphthaliX Inc.                                               |  | Delaware         
|                                                             |  |                  
|Eye-Fite Limited (wholly owned subsidiary of OphthaliX Inc.) |  | Israel           
|                                                             |  |                  
|Ultratrend Limited                                           |  | England and Wales
#### William CZYGAN, and Peter Bowman, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. The INSTITUTE OF EVOLUTIONARY PSYCHOLOGY, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 13, Docket 23005.

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

Argued Oct. 13, 1954.

Decided Nov. 5, 1954.

*343John P. Knox, Greenwich, Conn., William L. Beers, New Haven, Conn., for plaintiffs-appellants.

Durey, Pierson, Ward & Pringle, .Stamford, Conn., for defendant-appellee.

Before CHASE, MEDINA and HARLAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The complaint alleged that the appellants were induced by the fraudulent misrepresentations of the appellee to buy from it certain real estate in Greenwich, Conn., pursuant to the terms of a written contract and to make a down payment on the purchase price. Judgment for the resulting damages was sought .and the complaint was, without objection, treated at the trial as broad enough to include a claim, based on misrepresentations mistakenly made, for the rescission of the contract and the restoration of the down payment.

The comprehensive findings which the trial judge made on substantial supporting evidence show that the only representations for which the appellee could possibly be liable were made by Dr. Rogers. The appellants, who were looking for a piece of real estate suitable for industrial development, called upon him to help them find one. He was then temporarily connected with a real estate agency with which the property involved in this suit had formerly been listed for sale and, upon inquiry of the appellee’s president, learned that it was still for sale. Thereafter the services he performed were those of a real estate broker in the negotiations which resulted in its purchase by the appellants.

There was no evidence to show that Dr. Rogers was specifically authorized by the appellee to make any representations concerning the condition or nature of the property, but he did show it to the appellants and did make some representations which, upon independent investigation before they signed the contract in suit, they discovered to be inaccurate.

 It is clearly apparent from the findings that no material misrepresentations were made by Dr. Rogers which were relied upon by the appellants in making the purchase. Moreover, absent proof that the appellee had specifically authorized him to make representations in its behalf while serving as a real estate broker in the negotiations, or proof of its adoption and ratification of those he did make, his representations were not binding upon the appellee. Politziner v. Vanetch, 101 Conn. 265, 125 A. 630.

Judgment affirmed.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Relief Assistance

By Sgt. Jasmine Higgins

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More News/Articles
Exhibit 13.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
UNDER SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT



Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Can-Fite BioPharma
Ltd. (the “Company”) hereby certifies to such officer’s knowledge that:



(i) the
accompanying Annual Report on Form 20-F/A of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2018 (the “Report”) fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(ii) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.



|Dated: April 2,
    2019 | 
|------------------------ | 
|                         | 
|/s/ Pnina Fishman        | 
|Pnina Fishman, Ph.D.     | 
|Chief Executive Officer  | 



The foregoing certification is being furnished
solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and is not being filed for the purposes of Section 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference to any filing of the Company, whether made
before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 34 (Friday, February 18, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 9578-9579]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-3707]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention


Clinical Laboratory Improvement Advisory Committee

    Correction: This notice was published in the Federal Register on 
January 31, 2011, Volume 76, Number 20, page 5379. The location of the 
meeting has changed as follows:

[[Page 9579]]

    Place: DoubleTree Hotel Atlanta Buckhead, 3342 Peachtree Road, NE., 
Piedmont Room, Atlanta, Georgia 30326.
    Contact Person for Additional Information: Nancy Anderson, Chief, 
Laboratory Practice Standards Branch, Division of Laboratory Science 
and Standards, Laboratory Science, Policy and Practice Program Office, 
Office of Surveillance, Epidemiology and Laboratory Services, Centers 
for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Road, NE., Mailstop F-
11, Atlanta, Georgia 30333; telephone (404) 498-2741; fax (404) 498-
2219; or via e-mail at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#de90bfb0bda7f09fb0babbacadb1b09ebdbabdf0b6b6adf0b9b1a8"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="c28ca3aca1bbec83aca6a7b0b1adac82a1a6a1ecaaaab1eca5adb4">[email protected]</span></a>.
    The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, has been 
delegated the authority to sign Federal Register Notices pertaining to 
announcements of meetings and other committee management activities, 
for the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Agency for 
Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.

    Dated: February 14, 2011.
Elaine L. Baker,
Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for Disease 
Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2011-3707 Filed 2-17-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                           9,044
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    8,805
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                22,453
<PP&E>                                         143,838
<DEPRECIATION>                                (15,386)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 156,788
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           20,880
<BONDS>                                        140,852
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                     (5,001)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   156,788
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                16,446
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   12,182
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (275)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,469
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,930)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (1,376)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,554)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  (531)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,085)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00
        

</TABLE>
#### In the Matter of Richard H., Respondent, v Tami J., Appellant.

[823 NYS2d 711]

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Monroe County (Julie Anne Gordon, R.), entered April 29, 2004 in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6. The order awarded custody of the child to petitioner and visitation to respondent.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in the decision at Family Court. Present—Kehoe, J.P, Martoche, Centra, Green and Pine, JJ.
§ 161.706 What actions does BIA take against trespassers? If the trespasser fails to take the corrective action as specified, BIA may take one or more of the following actions, as appropriate: ( a ) Seize, impound, sell or dispose of unauthorized livestock or other property involved in the trespass. BIA may keep the property seized for use as evidence.
( b ) Assess penalties, damages, and costs under § 161.712.
### §2581. Excess UH–1 Huey and AH–1 Cobra helicopters: requirements for transfer to foreign countries

(a) Requirements.—(1) Before an excess UH–1 Huey helicopter or AH–1 Cobra helicopter is transferred on a grant or sales basis to a foreign country for the purpose of flight operations by that country, the Secretary of Defense shall make all reasonable efforts to ensure that the helicopter receives, to the extent necessary, maintenance and repair equivalent to the depot-level maintenance and repair (as defined in section 2460 of this title) that the helicopter would need were the helicopter to remain in operational use with the armed forces. Any such maintenance and repair work shall be performed at no cost to the Department of Defense.

(2) The Secretary shall make all reasonable efforts to ensure that maintenance and repair work described in paragraph (1) is performed in the United States.

(b) Exception.—Subsection (a) does not apply with respect to salvage helicopters provided to the foreign country solely as a source for spare parts.

(Added Pub. L. 105–261, div. A, title XII, §1234(a), Oct. 17, 1998, 112 Stat. 2156.)
I.   Exhibit 3.1


                            CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
                                       OF
                AMENDED AND RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
                                       OF
                                MULTEX.COM, INC.

           Multex.com,  Inc. (the  "Corporation"),  a corporation  organized and
existing  under  and by virtue of the  General  Corporation  Law of the State of
Delaware,

           DOES HEREBY CERTIFY:

           FIRST:  That  the  Board of  Directors  of the  Corporation  has duly
adopted  resolutions  setting  forth a proposed  amendment  of the  Amended  and
Restated  Certificate of Incorporation  (the "Certificate of  Incorporation") of
said  Corporation,  declaring  said amendment to be advisable and directing that
the  proposed  amendment  be  considered  at  the  next  annual  meeting  of the
stockholders  of said  Corporation  for  consideration  thereof.  The resolution
setting forth the proposed amendment is as follows:

           RESOLVED,  that the Certificate of  Incorporation of this Corporation
           be amended by replacing the second and third sentences of Article IV,
           Section A with the following sentences:

           "The total number of shares that the  Corporation  is  authorized  to
issue is Two Hundred  Five Million  (205,000,000)  shares.  Two Hundred  Million
(200,000,000)  shares, par value $0.01 per share, shall be Common Stock and Five
Million  (5,000,000)  shares,  par value  $0.01 per  share,  shall be  Preferred
Stock."

           SECOND:  That the  foregoing  amendment  has been duly adopted by the
stockholders  in  accordance  with the  provisions of Section 242 of the General
Corporation Law of the State of Delaware.

           IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Corporation has caused this certificate to be
signed this 31st day of July, 2000 by Isaak Karaev,  its Chief Executive Officer
and Chairman of the Board of Directors.


                                          By:   /s/ Isaak Karaev
                                             --------------------------
                                             Isaak Karaev
                                             Chief Executive Officer
PUBLIC LAW 115–74—NOV. 1, 2017 131 STAT. 1243 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.J. Res. 111: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 163 (2017): 

July 25, considered and passed House. 

Oct. 24, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

Public Law 115–74 

115th Congress 

Joint Resolution 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States 

Code, of the rule submitted by Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating 

to ‘‘Arbitration Agreements’’. 

Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the

United States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress 

disapproves the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to ‘‘Arbitration Agreements’’ (82 Fed. Reg. 

33210 (July 19, 2017)), and such rule shall have no force or effect. 

Approved November 1, 2017. 

Nov. 1, 2017 

[H.J. Res. 111]
Exhibit 99.5



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of
Brookfield Canada Office Properties (the “Company”) on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2013, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, T. Jan Sucharda, President and Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|By:    /s/ T. Jan Sucharda
        T.
Jan Sucharda
        President and Chief Executive Officer
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



March
31, 2014





11