alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 914

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to limit the penalty for

late enrollment under the Medicare Program to 10 percent and twice

the period of no enrollment.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 2, 1999

Mr. FRANK of Massachusetts (for himself, Mr. PAYNE, Mr. SERRANO, Mr.

SANDERS, Mr. LAFALCE, Mrs. CHRISTIAN-CHRISTENSEN, Mr. VENTO,

Mr. WYNN, Mr. FROST, Mr. BOEHLERT, Mr. COYNE, Mr. SMITH of

Washington, Ms. PELOSI, Ms. WATERS, Mr. THOMPSON of Mississippi,

Mr. HALL of Ohio, Mr. NEAL of Massachusetts, Mr. ACKERMAN, Mr.

OBERSTAR, Mr. BOUCHER, Mr. OLVER, Mr. QUINN, Mr. KLECZKA, Mr.

UNDERWOOD, Mr. GOODE, Mrs. MINK of Hawaii, Mr. FILNER, and Mr.

HINCHEY) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and

Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in

each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

A BILL

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to limit

the penalty for late enrollment under the Medicare Program to 10 percent and twice the period of no enrollment.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

HR 914 IH

1 SECTION 1. LIMITING MEDICARE LATE ENROLLMENT PEN2 ALTY TO 10 PERCENT AND TWICE THE PE3 RIOD OF NO ENROLLMENT.

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—The first sentence of section

5 1839(b) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395r(b))

6 is amended by striking ‘‘10 percent of the monthly pre7 mium so determined for each full 10 months’’ and insert8 ing ‘‘10 percent of the monthly premium so determined

9 for premiums paid during a period equal to twice the num10 ber of months in each of the full periods of 12 months’’.

11 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—

12 (1) Section 1818(c) of such Act (42 U.S.C.

13 1395i–2(c)) is amended—

14 (A) by striking paragraph (6); and

15 (B) by redesignating paragraphs (7)

16 through (9) as paragraphs (6) through (8), re17 spectively.

18 (2) Section 1818(g)(2)(B) of such Act (42

19 U.S.C. 1395i–2(g)(2)(B)) is amended by striking

20 ‘‘by substituting’’ and all that follows and inserting

21 the following: ‘‘by substituting ‘section 1818 (with22 out any increase resulting from the application of

23 section 1839(b) to such section)’ for ‘section 1839

24 (without any increase under subsection (b) there25 of)’.’’.

26 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—
3

HR 914 IH

1 (1) The amendments made by this section shall

2 apply to premiums paid for months beginning after

3 the end of the 90-day period beginning on the date

4 of the enactment of this Act.

5 (2) In applying these amendments, months (be6 fore, during, or after the month in which this Act

7 is enacted) in which an individual was or is required

8 to pay an increased premium shall be taken into ac9 count in determining the month in which the pre10 mium will no longer be subject to an increase.

Æ
### §2145. Adjustments of amount of educational assistance and of subsistence allowance

(a) Once each year, the Secretary of Defense shall adjust the amount of educational assistance which may be provided to any person in any standard academic year under section 2143 of this title, and the amount of the subsistence allowance authorized under section 2144 of this title for pursuit of a course of instruction on a full-time basis, in a manner consistent with the change over the preceding twelve-month period in the average actual cost of attendance at public institutions of higher education.

(b) In this section, the term "actual cost of attendance" has the meaning given the term "cost of attendance" by section 472 of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1087ll).

(Added Pub. L. 96–342, title IX, §901(a), Sept. 8, 1980, 94 Stat. 1113; amended Pub. L. 100–180, div. A, title XII, §1231(18)(A), Dec. 4, 1987, 101 Stat. 1161; Pub. L. 103–35, title II, §201(c)(2), May 31, 1993, 107 Stat. 98.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1993—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 103–35 substituted "has the meaning given the term 'cost of attendance' by section 472 of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1087ll)" for "means the actual cost of attendance as determined by the Secretary of Education pursuant to section 411(a)(2)(B)(iv) of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1070a(a)(2)(B)(iv))".

1987—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 100–180 inserted "the term" after "In this section,".
Exhibit 33.1b



|              |  |  |  |  |  |                                                                                  
|------------- |  |  |  |  |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|LOGO ASSURANT |  |  |  |  |  | 260 Interstate North Circle, SE Atlanta, GA
30339 T 770.763-4000
www.assurant.com

February 26, 2018

REPORT ON ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH

§1122(d)(2)(vi), §1122(d)(4)(xi) and §1122(d)(4)(xii)

of REGULATION AB SERVICING CRITERIA

FOR THE REPORTING PERIOD

JANUARY 1, 2017 TO DECEMBER 31, 2017

American Security Insurance Company, Standard Guaranty Insurance Company and TrackSure Insurance Agency, Inc. (collectively, the Asserting Party)
is responsible for assessing compliance for the period of January 1, 2017 through December 31, 2017 (the Reporting Period) with the servicing criteria set forth in §1122(d)(2)(vi), §1122(d)(4)(xi) and
§1122(d)(4)(xii) of Title 17, §229.1122(d) of the Code of Federal Regulations, (the Applicable Servicing Criteria) which the Asserting Party has concluded are applicable to the insurance escrow servicing activities it performs
with respect to all mortgage backed securities transactions that were registered after January 1, 2006 with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933 (the Platform Transactions). The Asserting
Party used the criteria set forth in paragraph(d) of Item 1122 of Regulation AB to assess the compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.

The Asserting Party has assessed its compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria for the Reporting Period and has concluded that the Asserting Party has
complied, in all material respects, with the Applicable Servicing Criteria for the Reporting Period with respect to the Platform Transaction.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report on the assessment of compliance with the
Applicable Servicing Criteria as of and for the Reporting Period.

American Security Insurance Company

Standard Guaranty Insurance Company

TrackSure
Insurance Agency, Inc.



|                                                         
|---------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Garret Hale                                          
|By: Garrett Hale                                         
|Sr. Vice President of American Security Insurance Company
|and Standard Guaranty Insurance Company                  
|                                                         
|Date: 2-26-2018
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Mongolian Armed Forces Attend Airmen-to-Airmen Talk at Pacific Air Forces  

By Tech. Sgt. Jimmie D. PikePacific Air Forces Public Affairs

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

# Rodney M. Davis Promotes Pacific Partnership at Sail Raja Ampat 2014

By Mass Communication Specialist 3rd Class Derek A. HarkinsUSS Rodney M. Davis Public Affairs

                RAJA AMPAT, Indonesia  –              

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

pacom

news

articles
# Description of Materials Required for Plan Submitta l (Per 40 C.F.R. Part 51, Appendix V, Section 2.0 - C riteria)



## Administrative Materials (40 C.F.R. Part 51, Appendix V, Section 2.1)

Appendix V Section Appendix V Requirement Documentation Provided in Submittal Submittal Section 2.1(a) Formal letter of submittal Letter of Submitt al Preface
2.1(b) Evidence the plan has been

adopted and the effective date Secretary’s Declaration of Adoption B

2.1(c) Legal authority to adopt and

implement plan Kansas Air Quality Statutes (K.S.A. Chapter 65, Article 30)

Senate Substitute for HB 2369 (as published in the Kansas Register on May 28, 2009) C

2.1(d) Copy of actual regulation or

document Regional Haze SIP D

2.1(e) Evidence the State has followed

all procedural requirements Hearing Officer’s Report E

2.1(f) Evidence that public notice was

provided Kansas Register – July 17, 2008
Kansas Register – July 16, 2009
Newspaper Affidavits of Publication F

2.1(g) Certification that public hearing

was held as per information in public notice Hearing Officer’s Report E

2.1(h) Compilation of public

comments and responses thereto Attachment 4 to the Hearing Officer’s Report E

## Technical Support

(40 C.F.R. Part 51, Appendix V, Section 2.2)

Appendix V Section Appendix V Requirement Documentation Provided in Submittal Submittal Section
2.2(a) Identification of all relevant pollutants

affected by the plan Response as appropriate. G

2.2(b) Identification of the location of

affected sources under the plan Response as appropriate. G

2.2(c) Quantification of the changes in the

plan’s allowable emissions Response as appropriate. G

2.2(d) Demonstration that the ambient air

quality will not deteriorate, etc. Response as appropriate. G
2.2(e) Modeling information Response as appropriate . G

2.2(f) Evidence that emissions limits are

continuous emission reduction technology-based Response as appropriate. G

2.2(g) Evidence that plan contains emissions

limits, etc. Response as appropriate. G
2.2(h) Compliance/enforcement provisions Response as appropriate. G

2.2(i) Special economic or technological

justifications as needed, or explanation of why justification not needed Response as appropriate. G
|   |
|---|
|   |  |
| 1 | I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Ally Auto Receivables Trust 2011-5 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”); |

|   |
|---|
|   |  |
| 2 | Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; |

|   |
|---|
|   |  |
| 3 | Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports; |

|   |
|---|
|   |  |
| 4 | Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and |

|   |
|---|
|   |  |
| 5 | All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K. |

|                                                               |
|---------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                               |  |
| /s/ Ryan C. Farris                                            |   |
|                                                          |
| Ryan C. Farris                                                |
| President, Ally Auto Assets LLC, as Depositor                 |
| (Senior Officer in charge of securitization of the depositor) |
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Pentagon Official Says Next Generation of Leaders Key to Solving Security Challenges

By Joseph ClarkDOD News

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More
### §20252a. Special selection review boards: reference

Section 628a of this title, relating to the convening of a special selection review board when credible information of an adverse nature was not furnished to a promotion board, applies with respect to persons recommended by a selection board for promotion to a grade at or below the grade of major general in the Space Force.

(Added Pub. L. 118–31, div. A, title XVII, §1716(c), Dec. 22, 2023, 137 Stat. 653.)
EXHIBIT 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the
dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.
  By:
    
    /s/ Philip Cook
    
    
    
    By:
    
    /s/ Glenn DardenPhilip Cook
    
    
    
    
    
    Glenn DardenSenior Vice President  Chief Financial Officer
    
    
    
    
    
    President and Chief Executive Officer
#### § 1200.17 What special criteria will be used to evaluate management plans for judgment or settlement funds?

For judgment or settlement funds, in addition to the criteria in § 1200.16, we will determine if the plan adequately provides for compliance with any conditions, uses of funds, or other requirements established by the appropriate judgment fund plan or settlement act.
§ 1000.382 What may the Tribe's/Consortium's annual report on self-governance address? ( a ) The Tribe's/Consortium's annual self-governance report may address: ( 1 ) A list of unmet Tribal needs in order of priority;
( 2 ) The approved, year-end Tribal budget for the programs and services funded under self-governance, summarized and annotated as the Tribe may deem appropriate;
( 3 ) Identification of any reallocation of trust programs;
( 4 ) Program and service delivery highlights, which may include a narrative of specific program redesign or other accomplishments or benefits attributed to self-governance; and
( 5 ) At the Tribe's/Consortium's option, a summary of the highlights of the report referred to in paragraph (a)(2) of this section and other pertinent information the Tribes may wish to report.
( b ) The report submitted under this section is intended to provide the Department with information necessary to meet its Congressional reporting responsibilities and to fulfill its responsibility as an advocate for self-governance. The Tribal reporting requirement is not intended to be burdensome, and Tribes are encouraged to design and present the report in a brief and concise manner.
#### Ramon Trevino, Jr., v. The State.

No. 22632.

Delivered January 12, 1944.

The opinion states the case.

*R. R. Smith*and *Frank W. Steinle,*both of Jourdanton, for appellant.

*Ernest S. Goens,*State’s Attorney, of Austin, for the State.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

Appellant was sentenced to twenty years in the penitentiary upon a jury verdict and brings this appeal.

• The record is before us without a statement of facts. A very extended amended motion for new trial refers to numerous bills *545of exception by number, yet we find no such bills in the record before us.

The court refused appellant’s special requested charge number one which appears in the record, but it does not appear that any exception was taken to his ruling. Furthermore, we are unable to appraise the merits of such request in the absence of a statement of facts.

The motion for a new trial is accompanied by a great number of affidavits to support his plea, based on newly discovered evidence, but these are likewise insufficient in the absence of a statement of facts.

We have carefully examined the record and find the presentation of the case in proper form; the charge of the court meets all requirements in so far as we are able to determine without a statement of facts; the judgment and sentence are, in every respect, regular and it is our conclusion that nothing is presented for our consideration.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

 FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

JOSE ANGEL PAMBLANCO,

Appellant,

v. Case No. 5D16-691

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

________________________________/

Opinion filed September 2, 2016

3.850 Appeal from the Circuit 

Court for Orange County,

Marc L. Lubet, Judge.

Jose Angel Pamblanco, Avon Park, pro se.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, 

Tallahassee, and Bonnie Jean Parrish, 

Assistant Attorney General, Daytona 

Beach, for Appellee.

EDWARDS, J.

Jose Pamblanco ("Appellant") appeals the partial denial of his motion seeking 

postconviction relief. Though Appellant's motion raised numerous issues, only one issue 

merits discussion. Appellant asserts that his convictions and sentences for both (1) 

traveling to meet a minor for an unlawful sexual act and (2) solicitation of a minor via a 
2

device capable of electronic data storage or transmission violate the prohibition against 

double jeopardy. 

The unlawful solicitation and travel took place over several days in February 2010.

Thus, the State could have charged Appellant with multiple counts of solicitation and 

traveling with regard to the multiple offenses occurring on multiple occasions. However, 

the information charged Appellant with one count of solicitation and one count of traveling

based on the same conduct. 

Relying upon Stapler v. State, 190 So. 3d 162 (Fla. 5th DCA 2016), decided after 

the postconviction court’s ruling in this case, we find that the dual convictions and 

sentences violated Appellant’s right to be free from double jeopardy. 190 So. 3d at 165.

Accordingly, we affirm his conviction under section 847.0135(4)(a), Florida Statutes 

(2010), but reverse his conviction under section 847.0135(3)(a), Florida Statutes (2010).

We remand for resentencing based upon Appellant’s recalculated scoresheet. We affirm 

as to all other issues raised by Appellant.

AFFIRMED IN PART, REVERSED IN PART, AND REMANDED.

SAWAYA and BERGER, JJ., concur.
#### § 1000.230 How is a waiver approval documented for the record?

The waiver decision is made part of the AFA by attaching a copy of it to the AFA and by mutually executing any necessary conforming amendments to the AFA. The decisions announcing the waiver also will be posted on the Office of Self-Governance web site and all such decisions shall be made available on request.