alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Joseph Blaine SPEAR, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.

No. 6824.

United States Court of Appeals Fourth Circuit.

Argued Oct. 5, 1954.

Decided Oct. 6, 1954.

Buford T. Henderson, Winston-Salem, N. C., for appellant.

Lafayette Williams, Asst. U. S. Atty., Yadkinville, N. C. (Edwin M. Stanley, U. S. Atty., Greensboro, N. C., on brief), for appellee.

Before PARKER, Chief Judge, SOPER, Circuit Judge, and HOFFMAN, District Judge.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal in a criminal case in which the appellant was convicted under two indictments, one charging appellant and one Minter with removal and concealment of distilled spirits in July 1952, the other charging appellant with operating an illicit distillery in February 1953. The two cases were consolidated for trial and both appellant and Minter were convicted but Minter has not appealed.

The appellant contends that the two cases were improperly consolidated, that a record of whiskey transactions kept by the witness Ollie C. Tharpe was improperly admitted in evidence and that there was no sufficient evidence of the operation of an illicit distillery by appellant. There is not sufficient merit in any of the contentions to justify discussion. The consolidation of the cases was clearly authorized by Rule 13 of the Rules of Criminal Procedure, 18 U.S.C. A., as the offenses charged could clearly have been charged in a single indictment under Rule 8. The admission in evi*186deuce of the book entries was authorized by 28 U.S.C. § 1732 and in the absence of the statute would have been admissible in corroboration of the witness who had testified to the transactions evidenced by them. The evidence established that an illicit distillery had been operated on defendant’s premises and there was ample proof to connect defendant with its operation..

The judgment and sentence appealed from will be affirmed and mandate will issue forthwith, as there is no,sufficient question in the case to justify the defendant’s being allowed to remain longer at liberty under bail.

Affirmed.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS

ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Global Crossing Limited (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2008
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the report), I, John A. Kritzmacher, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                           
|-------------------------------------------
|Date: November 6, 2008                     
|                                           
|/S/ JOHN A. KRITZMACHER                    
|John A. Kritzmacher Chief Financial Officer
H. Res. 244

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

July 13, 1999.

Whereas each of the athletes on the United States Women’s

Soccer Team has honored the Nation through her dedication to excellence;

Whereas the United States Women’s Soccer Team has raised

the level of awareness and appreciation for women’s

sports throughout the United States;

Whereas the members of the United States Women’s Soccer

Team have become positive role models for American

youth aspiring to participate in national and international level sports; and

Whereas the United States Women’s Soccer Team has qualified for the 2000 summer Olympic games: Now, therefore, be it

Resolved, That the House of Representatives—

(1) congratulates the United States Women’s Soccer Team on its winning championship performance in

the World Cup tournament;

(2) recognizes the important contribution each individual team member has made to the United States and

to the advancement of women’s sports; and
2

•HRES 244 EH

(3) invites the members of the United States Women’s Soccer Team to the United States Capitol to be

honored and recognized by the House of Representatives

for their achievements.

Attest:

Clerk.
# C_2013053EN.01000101.xml

| 22.2.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 53/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.2.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 53/1

---

Summary of European Union decisions on marketing authorisations in respect of medicinal products from 1 October 2012 to 31 October 2012

(Published pursuant to Article 13 or Article 38 of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council
   (1)
  )

(Published pursuant to Article 13 or Article 38 of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council

1

)

2013/C 53/01

—   Modification of a marketing authorization (Article 13 of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council): Accepted

Modification of a marketing authorization (Article 13 of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council): Accepted

| Date of the decision | Name of the medicinal product | Holder of the marketing authorization | Number of the entry in the Community Register | Date of notification |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 25.10.2012 | Keppra | UCB Pharma S.A. |
| Allée de la Recherche 60, 1070 Bruxelles, Belgique/Researchdreef 60, 1070 Brussel, België |

Date of the decision

Name of the medicinal product

Holder of the marketing authorization

Number of the entry in the Community Register

Date of notification

25.10.2012

Keppra

UCB Pharma S.A.

Allée de la Recherche 60, 1070 Bruxelles, Belgique/Researchdreef 60, 1070 Brussel, België

EU/1/00/146

29.10.2012

25.10.2012

Temozolomide Hospira

| Hospira UK Limited |
| --- |
| Queensway, Royal Leamington Spa, Warwickshire CV31 3RW, United Kingdom |

Hospira UK Limited

Queensway, Royal Leamington Spa, Warwickshire CV31 3RW, United Kingdom

EU/1/10/615

29.10.2012

---

(1)  OJ L 136, 30.4.2004, p. 1.

1

---
§ 163.21 Bonds required. ( a ) Performance bonds will be required in connection with all sales of forest products, except they may or may not be required, as determined by the approving officer, in connection with the use of forest products by Indian tribal forest enterprises pursuant to this part in § 163.13 or in timber cutting permits issued pursuant to § 163.26 of this part. ( 1 ) In sales in which the estimated stumpage value, calculated at the appraised stumpage rates, does not exceed $15,000, the bond shall be at least 20 percent of the estimated stumpage value.
( 2 ) In sales in which the estimated stumpage value exceeds $15,000 but is not over $150,000, the bond shall be at least 15 percent of the estimated stumpage value but not less than $3,000.
( 3 ) In sales in which the estimated stumpage value exceeds $150,000, but is not over $350,000, the bond shall be at least 10 percent of the estimated stumpage value but not less than $22,500.
( 4 ) In sales in which the estimated stumpage value exceeds $350,000, the bond shall be at least 5 percent of the estimated stumpage value but not less than $35,000.
( b ) Bonds shall be in a form acceptable to the approving officer and may include: ( 1 ) A corporate surety bond by an acceptable surety company;
( 2 ) A cash bond designating the approving officer to act as trustee under terms of an appropriate trust;
( 3 ) Negotiable U.S. Government securities supported by an appropriate trust instrument; or
( 4 ) An irrevocable letter of credit.
### Mode of flow of Saskatchewan Glacier, Alberta, Canada

By: Mark Frederick Meier

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/pp351

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 3**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 4**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 5**                            (pdf) 
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

# USINDOPACOM Statement on DPRK Missile Launches

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command Public Affairs

We are aware of the DPRK’s additional ballistic missile launches, and we are consulting closely with our allies and partners. While we have assessed that this event does not pose an immediate threat to U.S. personnel or territory, or to our allies, the missile launches highlight the destabilizing impact of the DPRK’s unlawful WMD and ballistic missile programs. The U.S. commitments to the defense of the Republic of Korea and Japan remain ironclad.

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT
### **CHAPTER 1803—FACILITIES FOR RESERVE COMPONENTS**

Sec.
18231.
Purpose.
18232.
Definitions.
18233.
Acquisition.
18233a.
Notice and wait requirements for certain projects.
18233b.
Authority to carry out small projects with operation and maintenance funds.
18234.
Location and use.
18235.
Administration; other use permitted by Secretary.
18236.
Contributions to States; other use permitted by States.
18237.
Supervision of construction: compliance with State law.
18238.
Army National Guard of United States; Air National Guard of United States: limitation on relocation of units.
18239.
Waiver of certain restrictions.
18240.
Acquisition of facilities by exchange.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**2004**—Pub. L. 108–375, div. B, title XXVIII, §§2808(c), 2809(a)(2), Oct. 28, 2004, 118 Stat. 2125, 2127, substituted "Notice and wait requirements for certain projects" for "Limitation on certain projects; authority to carry out small projects with operation and maintenance funds" in item 18233a and added items 18233b and 18240.

**1994**—Pub. L. 103–337, div. A, title XVI, §1664(b)(1), (3), Oct. 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 3010, renumbered chapter 133 as this chapter and renumbered items 2231 to 2239 as items 18231 to 18239, respectively.

**1982**—Pub. L. 97–214, §3(b)(2), (c)(2), July 12, 1982, 96 Stat. 169, 170, substituted "Limitation on certain projects; authority to carry out small projects with operation and maintenance funds" for "Limitation" in item 2233a, and added item 2239.

**1958**—Pub. L. 85–861, §1(42), Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1457, inserted ": compliance with State law" in item 2237.

Pub. L. 85–685, title VI, §601(4), Aug. 20, 1958, 72 Stat. 665, added item 2233a.
#### State of Nebraska, appellee, v. Wayne P. Manzer, appellant.

225 N.W.2d 424

Filed January 30, 1975.

No. 39639.

. William J. Dunn of Gross, Welch, Vinardi, Kauffman & Day, for appellant.

Clarence A. H. Meyer, Attorney General, and Ralph H. Gillan, for appellee.

*91' Heard before Spencer, Boslaugh, McCown, Newton, Clinton, and Brodkey, JJ.

McCown, J.

' The defendant pleaded nolo contendere to a charge of forcible rape and was sentenced to a term of 7 to 10 years imprisonment. On appeal the sole issue is the ex-cessiveness of sentence.

The 23-year-old defendant is one of three individuals all of whom were found guilty of a forcible gang rape of a 16-year-old girl. One was found guilty by a jury, one pleaded guilty, and this defendant pleaded nolo contendere. Each of them received the same sentence on the charge of forcible rape.

The defendant’s record, although it does not disclose prior felony offenses or crimes of violence, shows a long list of misdemeanor convictions and multiple jail sentences extending over a period of 4 years prior to the conviction here.

A sentence imposed within statutory limits will not be disturbed on appeal unless there is an abuse of discretion. State v. Haigh, 189 Neb. 316, 202 N. W. 2d 593; There was no abuse of discretion here.

; The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.
155 So.2d 603

#### Joseph Charles JONES v. STATE.

3 Div. 44.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

July 25, 1963.

Fred Gray and Solomon S. Seay, Jr., Montgomery, Jack Greenberg and Leroy D. Clark, New York City, and Louis H. Poliak, New Haven, Conn., for petitioner.

Richmond M. Flowers, Atty. Gen., and Leslie Hall, Asst. Atty. Gen., opposed.

COLEMAN, Justice.

Petition of Joseph Charles Jones for certiorari to the Court of Appeals to review and revise the judgment and decision of that Court in Jones v. State, 155 So.2d 603.

Writ denied.

LIVINGSTON, C. J., and LAWSON and GOODWYN, JJ., concur.
# C_2017093EN.01025901.xml

| 24.3.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 93/259 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.3.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 93/259

---

P7_TA(2014)0078

Agreement between the European Union and the Swiss Confederation concerning cooperation on the application of their competition laws ***

European Parliament legislative resolution of 5 February 2014 on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of an Agreement between the European Union and the Swiss Confederation concerning cooperation on the application of their competition laws (12418/2012 — C7-0146/2013 — 2012/0127(NLE))

(Consent)

(2017/C 093/48)

The European Parliament,

The European Parliament

| — | having regard to the draft Council decision (12418/2012), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the draft Council decision (12418/2012),

| — | having regard to the draft agreement between the European Union and the Swiss Confederation concerning cooperation on the application of their competition laws (12513/2012), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the draft agreement between the European Union and the Swiss Confederation concerning cooperation on the application of their competition laws (12513/2012),

| — | having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Articles 103 and 352, in conjunction with Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (a)(v), of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C7-0146/2013), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Articles 103 and 352, in conjunction with Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (a)(v), of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C7-0146/2013),

| — | having regard to Rules 81 and 90(7) of its Rules of Procedure, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Rules 81 and 90(7) of its Rules of Procedure,

| — | having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs and the opinion of the Committee on International Trade (A7-0060/2014), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs and the opinion of the Committee on International Trade (A7-0060/2014),

| 1. | Consents to conclusion of the agreement; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Consents to conclusion of the agreement;

| 2. | Reminds the Council that, should it amend its draft decision, the consent of the European Parliament will have to be requested anew; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Reminds the Council that, should it amend its draft decision, the consent of the European Parliament will have to be requested anew;

| 3. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States and of the Swiss Confederation. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States and of the Swiss Confederation.

---
### §2903. Executive Director

(a) There shall be an Executive Director of the Council appointed by the Secretary of Defense after consultation with the Secretary of Energy.

(b) Subject to the authority, direction, and control of the Secretary of Defense, the Executive Director is responsible for the management of the Strategic Environmental Research and Development Program in accordance with the policies established by the Council.

(c) The Executive Director may enter into contracts using competitive procedures. The Executive Director may enter into other agreements in accordance with applicable law. In either case, the Executive Director shall first obtain the approval of the Council for any contract or agreement in an amount equal to or in excess of $500,000 or such lesser amount as the Council may prescribe.

(d)(1) The Executive Director, with the concurrence of the Council, may appoint such professional and clerical staff as may be necessary to carry out the responsibilities and policies of the Council.

(2) The Executive Director, with the concurrence of the Council and without regard to the provisions of chapter 51 of title 5 and subchapter III of chapter 53 of such title, may establish the rates of basic pay for professional, scientific, and technical employees appointed pursuant to paragraph (1).

(Added Pub. L. 101–510, div. A, title XVIII, §1801(a)(1), Nov. 5, 1990, 104 Stat. 1755; amended Pub. L. 102–25, title VII, §701(h)(2), Apr. 6, 1991, 105 Stat. 115; Pub. L. 103–160, div. A, title II, §265(b), Nov. 30, 1993, 107 Stat. 1611; Pub. L. 104–106, div. A, title II, §203(d), (e)(1), Feb. 10, 1996, 110 Stat. 218.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1996—Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 104–106, §203(d), substituted "contracts using competitive procedures. The Executive Director may enter into" for "contracts or" and "law. In either case," for "law, except that".

Subsec. (d)(2). Pub. L. 104–106, §203(e)(1), struck out at end "The authority provided in the preceding sentence shall expire on September 30, 1995."

1993—Subsec. (d)(2). Pub. L. 103–160 substituted "September 30, 1995" for "November 5, 1992".

1991—Subsec. (d)(2). Pub. L. 102–25 substituted "on November 5, 1992" for "two years after the date of the enactment of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1991".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1996 Amendment

Pub. L. 104–106, div. A, title II, §203(e)(2), Feb. 10, 1996, 110 Stat. 218, provided that: "The amendment made by paragraph (1) [amending this section] shall take effect as of September 29, 1995."
### §20303. Reference to chapter 31

For other provisions of this title applicable to enlistments in the Space Force, see chapter 31 of this title.

(Added Pub. L. 118–31, div. A, title XVII, §1717(a), Dec. 22, 2023, 137 Stat. 654.)
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Cosine Communications, Inc.
(the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2003 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Terry Gibson, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my
knowledge:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                        
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.

/s/ Terry Gibson

Terry Gibson
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
August 13, 2003

PAGE 36 OF 36
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

# Secretary of the Navy Visits Singapore during CARAT 2014

By Mass Communications Specialist Second Class Christian EskelundCommander, Task Force 73 Public Affairs

                SINGAPORE  –              

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

pacom

news

articles