alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### ft. from Line, ft. from Line, Sec. R County Elevation Completed as

For Vertical Well: Total depth ft. Plugged back to For Horizontal or Directionally Drilled Well: Enter well bore and bottom hole location data on page 2 of this form. For coal bed natural gas well: Static water level ft. below reference elevation of ft.

Well is producing from formation(s) or pool(s). I.P. barrels of oil, MCF of gas, and barrels of water per hours. Holes per

foot Size and Type Open or Isolated (method of isolation) Bottom



### Acidized, Shot, Fraced, Squeezed, or Cemented Well Bore Interval Top Bottom Treatment Type Amount and Type of Material Max. Rate Max. Pressure (BBLS/Min) (PSI) 

### Perforated or Open-hole Intervals Open Hole/Perf'd Zone

Top 

### String Grade Weight Size Type (MD, Feet) To 

### Well Bore Date Completed

Casing and Tubing Record The information given herewith is a complete and correct record of the well as of the date of preparation.

ft. Signed (Oil, gas, cbm, injection, dry hole, etc.)


### Title Date

(MD, Feet) From (MD, Feet) 

### Telephone

(Feet) (MD, Feet) Cement Top 

### Date Spud

Packer Set Cement (Sacks) Length (KB) (Surface) 

### T (E/W) 

### API # 25 - - Lease (SUBMIT IN TRIPLICATE) TO



### Address Company Well No.

Well Bore Surface Location: (N/S) 

### MONTANA BOARD OF OIL AND GAS CONSERVATION 2535 ST. JOHNS AVENUE BILLINGS, MONTANA 59102 ARM 36.22.302 ARM 36.22.307 ARM 36.22.1011 ARM 36.22.1013 ARM 36.22.1414 

## COMPLETION REPORT
Field or Area Form No. 4 R10/09 LOCATE WELL CORRECTLY

### Initial 10-day average production /day (if taken) Pressures (if measured): Tubing psi flowing: psi shut-in Casing psi flowing: psi shut-in Formation Volume Factor Porosity % Water Saturation % Type Of Trap Producing Mechanism

TVD 

### Geological Markers Top MD Formation Top MD TVD N/S Kick-off Total Depth MD TVD Twp Rng Location, T-R-S 

### Bottom Hole Locations

Formation Log Type S.I.P. Cushion Recovery



### Logs Core # Interval From To Recovery 

### Cores Interval From To DST # From To F.P. Interval Tool Open (Min.) Shut-in (Min.)

### Drill Stem Tests E/W Well Bore Feet From N/S Line From E/W Line N / S Feet E / W MD Sec. From (Well bore)
EXHIBIT 32.2

Statement of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Knight Capital
Group, Inc. (the Company) for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), John B. Howard, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or, 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/    JOHN B. HOWARDName:

John B. HowardTitle:

Chief Financial OfficerDate:

May 9, 2007


This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
### §1184. Removal of officer: action by Secretary upon recommendation of board of inquiry

The Secretary of the military department concerned may remove an officer from active duty if the removal of such officer from active duty is recommended by a board of inquiry convened under section 1182 of this title.

(Added Pub. L. 96–513, title I, §110, Dec. 12, 1980, 94 Stat. 2874; amended Pub. L. 105–261, div. A, title V, §503(b)(2), (c)(1), Oct. 17, 1998, 112 Stat. 2003.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1998—Pub. L. 105–261 substituted "inquiry" for "review" in section catchline and "board of inquiry convened under section 1182 of this title" for "board of review convened under section 1183 of this title" in text.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Sept. 15, 1981, but the authority to prescribe regulations under this section effective on Dec. 12, 1980, see section 701 of Pub. L. 96–513, set out as an Effective Date of 1980 Amendment note under section 101 of this title.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

# Statement From Secretary of Defense Lloyd J. Austin III on Release of National Security Strategy

DOD Release

WASINGTON -- I warmly welcome the release of President Biden’s National Security Strategy, which outlines how the United States will tackle this century’s shared security challenges at home and abroad.As we confront strategic competitors and threatening and coercive behavior, the strategy prioritizes the People’s Republic of China as our most consequential geopolitical challenge while also standing up to an increasingly aggressive Russia. We will rely on integrated deterrence, as detailed in the Department’s National Defense Strategy, which will soon be released in unclassified form. We will seamlessly combine our capabilities to convince potential adversaries that the costs of their hostile activities far outweigh any possible benefits—in all theaters, in all domains, and across the spectrum of potential conflict. Meanwhile, we will continue to move boldly to strengthen and modernize our outstanding military, which provides the foundation of deterrence and makes clear our ability to prevail in conflict.I look forward to working alongside the men and women of the Defense Department and with our interagency partners across the U.S. government to implement the National Security Strategy and move together toward a brighter, more secure future for America and the world.

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More
### §15109. Other administrative authorities

(a) 1 In General.—The following provisions of this title shall apply to officers in competitive categories of officers designated for purposes of this chapter:

(1) Section 14518, relating to continuation of officers to complete disciplinary action.

(2) Section 14519, relating to deferment of retirement or separation for medical reasons.

(3) Section 14704, relating to the selective early removal from the reserve active-status list.

(4) Section 14705, relating to the selective early retirement of reserve general and flag officers of the Navy and Marine Corps.

(Added Pub. L. 118–31, div. A, title V, §514(a), Dec. 22, 2023, 137 Stat. 248.)

1 So in original. There is no subsec. (b).
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 136 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                        April 13, 1999.
    Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker 
may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule XVIII, declare the House resolved into the 
Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of the 
bill (H.R. 1143) to establish a program to provide assistance for programs of 
credit and other financial services for microenterprises in developing 
countries, and for other purposes. The first reading of the bill shall be 
dispensed with. Points of order against consideration of the bill for failure to 
comply with clause 4(a) of rule XIII are waived. General debate shall be 
confined to the bill and shall not exceed one hour equally divided and 
controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on 
International Relations. After general debate the bill shall be considered for 
amendment under the five-minute rule. Each section of the bill shall be 
considered as read. During consideration of the bill for amendment, the Chairman 
of the Committee of the Whole may accord priority in recognition on the basis of 
whether the Member offering an amendment has caused it to be printed in the 
portion of the Congressional Record designated for that purpose in clause 8 of 
rule XVIII. Amendments so printed shall be considered as read. The Chairman of 
the Committee of the Whole may: (1) postpone until a time during further 
consideration in the Committee of the Whole a request for a recorded vote on any 
amendment; and (2) reduce to five minutes the minimum time for electronic voting 
on any postponed question that follows another electronic vote without 
intervening business, provided that the minimum time for electronic voting on 
the first in any series of questions shall be 15 minutes. At the conclusion of 
consideration of the bill for amendment the Committee shall rise and report the 
bill to the House with such amendments as may have been adopted. The previous 
question shall be considered as ordered on the bill and amendments thereto to 
final passage without intervening motion except one motion to recommit with or 
without instructions.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 98-50223

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

TOMAS ORTIZ-PEREZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. DR-97-CR-272-1

- - - - - - - - - -

Consolidated with

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

 

No. 98-50229

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

EDWIN RAMON GUILLEN-HERNANDEZ, 

also known as Alexis Cruz-Selaya,

also known as Alexi Amed Selaya-Funez,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. DR-97-CR-336-ALL

- - - - - - - - - -

Consolidated with
No. 98-50223

-2-

 

No. 98-50230

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

NOE DE LUNA-BERRONES,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. DR-97-CR-360-ALL

- - - - - - - - - -

Consolidated with

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

 

No. 98-50401

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ALFREDO FUENTES-REA, also known as Rodolfo

Hernandez-Andrade, also known as Lorenzo

Leon-Corona, also known as Alfredo SevesFuentes, also known as Alfonso Reyes-Fuentes, 

also known as Raul Tolentino-Berrano,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. DR-97-CR-396-ALL

- - - - - - - - - -

Consolidated with
No. 98-50223

-3-

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

 

No. 98-50437

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

PEDRO ALVAREZ-OLALDE, also known as

Alfredo Alfenddelin-Olinde,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. DR-97-CR-309-ALL

- - - - - - - - - -

December 9, 1998

Before DAVIS, DeMOSS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The appellants pleaded guilty to illegally reentering the

country after having been deported. They argue that the district

court erred when it increased their offense levels by 16 under

U.S. Sentencing Guidelines § 2L1.2(b)(1)(A) for their prior state

drug convictions. They contend that, because their state felony

drug convictions would be only misdemeanors under federal law,

their prior convictions were not “drug-trafficking crime[s]”

under 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(2) and did not constitute “aggravated

felon[ies]” for purposes of § 2L1.2(b)(1)(A). Their argument is

foreclosed by United States v. Hinojosa-Lopez, 130 F.3d 691, 694

(5th Cir. 1997). The appellants’ convictions and sentences are
No. 98-50223

-4-

AFFIRMED.
| (1)    | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                   |
|-----------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                  |                                                                                                                                                              |
| (2)    | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Trust. |

| /s/      Randall D. Holmes |
|----------------------------|
| Name:                      | Randall      D. Holmes |
| Title:                     | President      and Chief Executive Officer(Principal      Executive Officer) |
|                       |   |
| Date:                      | August      12, 2008 |

| /s/      Jeffrey H. Strasberg |
|-------------------------------|
| Name:                         | Jeffrey      H. Strasberg |
| Title:                        | Executive      Vice President and Chief Financial Officer(Principal      Financial and Accounting Officer) |
|                          |   |
| Date:                         | August      12, 2008 |

----
#### § 117.16 Reimbursement to surplus funds.

When expenditures have been made from surplus funds upon the condition, and with the written agreement of the Indian, that reimbursement or repayment shall be made from future allowance funds, the superintendent is authorized to withhold from succeeding quarterly payments or other allowance funds such amounts as may be necessary to effect reimbursement within a period not exceeding 24 months from date of the first expenditure under the given authority.
#### § 141.50 Penalty and forfeiture of merchandise.

Any person other than an enrolled member of the tribe who either resides as a reservation business owner within the exterior boundaries of the Navajo, Hopi, or Zuni Reservations or introduces or attempts to introduce goods or to trade therein without a license shall forfeit all merchandise offered for sale to the Indians or found in the person's possession and is liable to a penalty of $1,617. This section may be enforced by commencing an action in the appropriate United States District Court under the provisions of 28 U.S.C. 1345.

[40 FR 39835, Aug. 29, 1975, as amended at 81 FR 42481, June 30, 2016; 82 FR 7652, Jan. 23, 2017; 83 FR 5195, Feb. 6, 2018; 84 FR 15101, Apr. 15, 2019; 85 FR 9369, Feb. 19, 2020; 86 FR 7347, Jan. 28, 2021; 87 FR 13156, Mar. 9, 2022; 88 FR 13021, Mar. 2, 2023; 89 FR 18363, Mar. 13, 2024]
#### Patricia E. Cherry, Respondent, v Patrick L. Cherry, Appellant.

[824 NYS2d 701]

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Chautauqua County (John T. Ward, Jr., A.J.), entered December 22, 2004 in a divorce action. The judgment, among other things, distributed certain marital property.

It is hereby ordered that said appeal insofar as it concerns retirement benefits be and the same hereby is unanimously dismissed and the judgment is affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment of divorce that, inter alia, distributed certain marital property, defendant contends that Supreme Court erred in directing him to select a certain retirement benefit and that he did not agree to a retirement benefit that would provide for payments to plaintiff in the event that he predeceased her. Those contentions are not reviewable by this Court because defendant failed to include in the record on appeal the order that allegedly directed him to select that benefit, the motion papers seeking that relief, or any evidence concerning the parties’ alleged agreement. Defendant, “as the appellant, submitted this appeal on an incomplete record and must suffer the consequences” *(Matter of Santoshia L.,*202 AD2d 1027, 1028 [1994]; *see Poly fusion Elecs., Inc. v AirSep Corp.,*30 AD3d 984 [2006]; *Brown v Barron*[appeal No. 3], 23 AD3d 1125 [2005]).

We reject the further contention of defendant that the court erred in refusing to award him a share of plaintiffs pension. Although it is well settled that pension benefits earned during a marriage are marital assets subject to equitable distribution *(see Olivo v Olivo,*82 NY2d 202, 207 [1993]; *Majauskas v Majauskas,*61 NY2d 481, 491-492 [1984]), it is equally well settled that the distribution of those assets is “subject to equitable considerations [, i.e.,] . . . considerations of fairness and the respective situations of the parties” *(Butler v Butler,*256 AD2d 1041, 1045 [1998], *lv denied*93 NY2d 805 [1999]). The record establishes that plaintiff is entitled to a minimal pension based upon her part-time employment as a school secretary, and the court awarded plaintiff the full value of that pension as part of its *1187overall distribution of marital property, after full consideration of the parties’ respective financial situations. We thus perceive no reason to disturb the court’s determination *(see Gasiorowski v Gasiorowski,*267 AD2d 557, 557-558 [1999], *lv denied*94 NY2d 762 [2000]).

We have considered defendant’s remaining contentions and conclude that they are without merit. Present—Scudder, J.R, Kehoe, Gorski, Smith and Pine, JJ.
Alertas de fraude y congelamientos de crédito: 

¿Cuál es la diferencia?

¿Está buscando maneras de proteger su crédito?

A continuación, dos opciones a considerar.

Alerta de fraude

Los otorgantes de préstamos tienen

que verificar su identidad antes de

otorgar un nuevo crédito a su nombre;

(por lo general, lo llamarán para verificar

su identidad.) 

Gratis.

Disponible para todas las personas afectadas 

por el robo de identidad o aquellas que 

sospechen que podrían estar afectadas.

Tiene una vigencia de un año. 

Para colocar una alerta: Comuníquese con 

una de las tres compañías de informes 

crediticios. Esa compañía debe informar a 

las otras dos.

Congelamiento de crédito

Restringe el acceso a su informe de crédito

para ayudar a prevenir el robo de identidad;

(por lo general, para colocar y levantar el

congelamiento, usted necesitará un PIN

o contraseña.)

Gratis.

Disponible para todas las personas.

Tiene vigencia hasta que usted lo levante.

Para colocar o levantar un congelamiento de 

crédito: Comuníquese con las tres compañías de 

informes crediticios. (Si sabe cuál es la compañía 

que usará un otorgante de préstamo, usted 

puede levantar únicamente el congelamiento

en esa compañía.)
¿Cómo comunicarse con las compañías de 

informes crediticios?

Para colocar una alerta de fraude o un congelamiento o bloqueo de 

crédito, comuníquese por los siguientes medios:

Equifax Equifax.com/personal/credit-report-services 

800-685-1111

Experian Experian.com/help 

888-EXPERIAN (888-397-3742)

TransUnion TransUnion.com/credit-help 

888-909-8872
#### § 12.5 [Reserved]
#### Paolini Pasquale, Respondent, v. Michael Del Papa, Appellant.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All concurred.
No. 9809.

#### J. J. Healey vs. Luke Dillon.

Plaintiff, as tlie alleged sexton of certain cemeteries, seeks to enjoin the defendant from claiming the same employment, on the ground of the illegality of the attempt to remove him under his alleged employment.

In the case entitled Healey vs. Rev. P. E. Allen, Ho. 9740 on the docket of this Court, it was held that they could not resist his removal by the writ of injunction; for the same reasons he cannot, by the same means, prevent the appointment of his successor.

APPEAL from the Civil District Court for the Parish of Orleans. *Bightor,*J.

*J. Timony*and *A. J. Murphy*for Plaintiff and Appellant.

*J. J. Finney, W. S. Bogers*and *J. A. Gilmore*for Defendant and Appellee.

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Poché, J,

Plaintiff sets up a contract with Rev. P. F. Allen, pastor of St. Patrick’s Church, in this city, appointing him sexton of three cemeteries for a term of twenty-five years to be computed from October, 1876, and he complains that, in violation of his said contract, the defendant, Dillon, pretends to have been appointed sexton of the same cemeteries.

Hence he brought tki3 suit, in which he prays for an injunction to restrain the said defendant from disturbing him in his possession and control of the cemeteries aforesaid.

He prosecutes this appeal from a judgment confirming the appointment of Dillon as sexton, and rejecting his (plaintiff’s) demand.

Til at judgment was rendered on May 21, 1886.

Now, it appears from the records of this Court that a judgment was rendered here on the 29th of November, 1886, in the suit entitled J. J. Healey vs. Rev. P. F. Allen et al., No. 9740 (not yet reported) in which the issue involved the proper construction of the very contract which is the subject matter of the present controversy.

It was there held that Healey could not maintain an injunction to restrain Father Allen from discharging him as sexton ; for the reason that the contract there sued on was one of employment for personal services, for the enforcement of which the employee could not in law resort to the remedy of injunction. The practical operation of that judgment was to leave the removal of Healey as sexton judicially undisturbed, and as a consequence thereof to continue in possession of the cemeteries the party who had been appointed as his successor.

*504As it, was there settled that Healey could not, by injunction, escape the legal effect of his discharge or removal by Father Allen, it follows that he stands on no better ground in his present attempt to disturb his successor in his possession of the cemeteries, under an appointment from competent authority, by the remedy of injunction.

Hence we conclude that plaintiff has been deprived of no legal rights by the judgment appealed from.

Judgment affirmed.