alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 208

Calling on the National Cemetery Administration of the Department of Veterans Affairs to provide veterans reasonable access to burial in national

cemeteries.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 15, 1999

Ms. BROWN of Florida (for herself and Mr. EVANS) submitted the following

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs

RESOLUTION

Calling on the National Cemetery Administration of the Department of Veterans Affairs to provide veterans reasonable access to burial in national cemeteries.

Whereas in 1862, President Abraham Lincoln signed legislation authorizing the purchase of ‘‘cemetery grounds’’ to

be used as national cemeteries ‘‘for soldiers who shall

have died in the service of the country’’;

Whereas the United States has made a solemn commitment

to provide an appropriate final resting place for those

who have honorably served this Nation in the Armed

Forces;

Whereas the stated goal of the National Cemetery Administration of the Department of Veterans Affairs is to as-
2

•HRES 208 IH

sure that the burial needs of veterans are met in a manner that commemorates their service to our Nation;

Whereas nearly one third of United States veterans currently

do not have the option of being buried in a national cemetery or State veterans cemetery located within a reasonable distance of their residence—such distance being 75

miles, as determined by the National Cemetery Administration;

Whereas the National Cemetery Administration, in its fiscal

year 2000 performance plan, established a program objective that provides only 80 percent of United States

veterans with a burial option within a reasonable distance

of their residence;

Whereas a National Cemetery Administration goal which does

not provide 20 percent of United States veterans with a

burial option within a reasonable distance of their residence is not acceptable;

Whereas the National Cemetery Administration expects the

demand for cemetery space for veterans in national cemeteries will increase sharply in the near future, with burials increasing 42 percent from 1995 to 2010, and annual veteran deaths reaching the amount of 620,000 in

2008; and

Whereas the proposed fiscal year 2000 budget for the Department of Veterans Affairs failed to include a request

for any funding for the planning of any new national

cemeteries: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives—

2 (1) reaffirms the commitment of the United

3 States to the men and women who have honorably
3

•HRES 208 IH

1 served this Nation in the Armed Forces to provide

2 reasonable access to burial in a national cemetery or

3 State veterans cemetery; and

4 (2) calls on the National Cemetery Administra5 tion of the Department of Veterans Affairs, vested

6 with the responsibility of providing a final resting

7 place for America’s heroes, to commence without

8 delay the planning for the construction of new na9 tional cemeteries and other activities to provide

10 America’s veterans reasonable access to burial in a

11 national cemetery or State veterans cemetery.

Æ
#### YELLOW CAB COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant, v. PEARL BROWN, Plaintiff-Appellee.

No. 12019.

United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit.

Oct. 20, 1954.

Halle, Haber, Berick & McNulty, Cleveland, Ohio, for appellant.

Harrison, Spangenberg & Hull, Cleveland, Ohio, for appellee.

Before MARTIN, McALLISTER, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The above cause coming on to be heard on the record, the briefs of the parties, and the arguments of counsel in open court, and it appearing that the controlling issues were factual, properly determinable by the jury; that its verdict was sustained by substantial evidence; that there was no reversible error in the charge of the district court, or in its order overruling appellant’s motion for a new trial, and the court being duly advised,

*955Now, therefore, it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the judgment of the district court be and is hereby affirmed.
§ 140.9 Application for license. ( a ) Application for license must be made in writing on Form 5-052, setting forth the full name and residence of the applicant; if a firm, the firm name and the name of each member thereof; the place where it is proposed to carry on the trade; the capital to be invested; the names of the clerks to be employed; and the business experience of the applicant. The application must be forwarded through the Superintendent to the Commissioner of Indian Affairs, accompanied by two satisfactory testimonials on Form 2-077 as to the character of the applicant and his employees and their fitness to be in the Indian country, and by an affidavit of the Superintendent on Form 5-053 that neither he nor any person for him has any interest, direct or indirect, present or prospective, in the proposed business or the profits arising therefrom, and that no arrangement for any benefit to himself or to any other person on his behalf is contemplated in case the license is granted. Licensed traders will be held responsible for the conduct of their employees.
( b ) Itinerant peddlers or purveyors of foodstuffs and other merchandise shall be considered as traders and shall obtain a license or permit from the Superintendent setting forth the class of trade or peddling to be carried on, furnishing such character or credit references, or both, as may be required by the Superintendent. The period of the license for such itinerant peddlers shall be determined by the Superintendent.
( c ) When a license or permit to trade is issued under the regulations in this part 140, a fee of $5, payable when the license is issued, shall be levied against the licensee.
[30 FR 8267, June 29, 1965. Redesignated at 47 FR 13327, Mar. 30, 1982]
§ 11.452 Possession of a controlled substance. ( a ) It is unlawful for a person to knowingly or intentionally possess any controlled substance listed in 21 CFR Part 1308, as amended, unless: ( 1 ) The Controlled Substances Act or Drug Enforcement Agency regulations specifically authorizes possession of the substance;
( 2 ) The substance or preparation is excluded or exempted by 21 CFR 1308.21 through 1308.35, as amended; or
( 3 ) The provisions of 42 U.S.C. 1996a (regarding traditional Indian religious use of peyote) apply.
( b ) Violations of paragraph (a) of this section are punishable as a misdemeanor.
( c ) Any controlled substance involved in violation of this section is declared to be contraband. Upon proof of a violation of this section, the controlled substance must be forfeited to the Federal Government by order of the court, after public notice and an opportunity for any person claiming an interest in the substance to be heard.
( d ) Any personal property used to transport, conceal, manufacture, cultivate, or distribute a controlled substance in violation of this section is subject to forfeiture to the Federal Government by order of the court upon proof of this use, following public notice and opportunity for any person claiming an interest in the property to be heard.
[73 FR 39861, July 11, 2008]
# C_2013363EN.01000201.xml

| 13.12.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 363/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.12.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 363/2

---

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the TFEU

Cases where the Commission raises no objections

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2013/C 363/02)

| Date of adoption of the decision | 8.11.2013 |
| --- | --- |
| Reference number of State Aid | SA.37136 (13/N) |
| Member State | France |
| Region | Rhône-Alpes, Pays de la Loire | — |
| Title (and/or name of the beneficiary) | Financement de la station de radio locale France Bleu Saint-Étienne Loire |
| Legal basis | | Loi no 86-1067 du 30 septembre 1986 modifiée relative à la liberté de communication |

Date of adoption of the decision

8.11.2013

Reference number of State Aid

SA.37136 (13/N)

Member State

France

Region

Rhône-Alpes, Pays de la Loire

—

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

Financement de la station de radio locale France Bleu Saint-Étienne Loire

Legal basis

Loi no 86-1067 du 30 septembre 1986 modifiée relative à la liberté de communication

o

| | Décret du 13 novembre 1987 portant approbation du cahier des missions et des charges de la société Radio France |
| --- | --- |

Décret du 13 novembre 1987 portant approbation du cahier des missions et des charges de la société Radio France

| | Contrat d’objectifs et de moyens entre l'Etat et Radio France (2010-2014) |
| --- | --- |

Contrat d’objectifs et de moyens entre l'Etat et Radio France (2010-2014)

Type of measure

Individual aid

Radio France

Objective

Services of general economic interest, Culture

Form of aid

Direct grant

Budget

Overall budget: EUR 0,6 million

Intensity

50 %

Duration (period)

—

Economic sectors

Information and communication, Radio broadcasting

Name and address of the granting authority

| Ministère de la culture et de la communication |
| --- |
| 3 rue de Valois |
| 75033 Paris Cedex 01 |
| FRANCE |

Ministère de la culture et de la communication

3 rue de Valois

75033 Paris Cedex 01

FRANCE

Other information

—

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

http://ec.europa.eu/competition/elojade/isef/index.cfm

---
# C_2013208EN.01000401.xml

| 23.7.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 208/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.7.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 208/4

---

Notice regarding the adaptation in line with inflation of certain amounts laid down in the Reinsurance Directive

2013/C 208/06

In accordance with Article 41 of Directive 2005/68/EC (1) on reinsurance and amending Council Directives 73/239/EEC, 92/49/EEC as well as Directives 98/78/EC and 2002/83/EC, the amounts laid down in euros in Article 40(2) were reviewed in 2013 in order to take account of changes in the European index of consumer prices comprising all Member States, as published by Eurostat. As a result of the review, the amount laid down in euros as EUR 3 400 000 is increased to EUR 3 600 000 and the amount laid down in euros as EUR 1 200 000 does not change. The Commission Services have informed the European Parliament and the Council of the review and the adapted amount.

1

---

(1)  OJ L 323, 9.12.2005, p. 1.

1

---
Exhibit 32.1

Certification  Pursuant  to Section  906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 (18
U.S.C. ss.1350)

I, Beaufort J.B.  Clarke,  Chairman and Chief Executive  Officer of ICON Capital
Corp.,  the General  Partner of the Registrant in connection  with the Quarterly
Report of ICON Income Fund Eight A L.P. (the "Partnership") on Form 10-Q for the
period ended June 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the "Quarterly Report") certify,  pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

1.   The Quarterly  Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
     or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. ss.78m); and

2.   The information  contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents,  in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Partnership.


Dated:   August 11, 2006

 /s/ Beaufort J.B. Clarke
---------------------------------------
Beaufort J.B. Clarke
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
ICON Capital Corp.
General Partner of ICON Income Fund Eight A L.P.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

# Japan Self-Defense Force Joint Staff College Visits George Washington

By Mass Communication Specialist 3rd Class Paolo BayasUSS George Washington (CVN 73) Public Affairs

                YOKOSUKA, Japan  –              http://www.navy.mil/submit/display.asp?story_id=78367

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT
**  **

Exhibit 32.1
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 4 (Friday, January 6, 2012)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 745]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-33857]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

[DOD-2010-OS-0043; RIN 0790-AI62]

32 CFR Part 222


DoD Mandatory Declassification Review (MDR) Program; Correction

AGENCY: Department of Defense.

ACTION: Final rule; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On December 27, 2011 (76 FR 80744-80747), Department of 
Defense published a final rule titled DoD Mandatory Declassification 
Review (MDR) Program, which assigns responsibilities and provides 
procedures for members of the public to request a declassification 
review of information classified under the provisions of Executive 
Order 13526, or predecessor orders. This rule corrects a paragraph 
identification error in the regulations.

DATES: This correction is effective January 26, 2012.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Patricia Toppings, (571) 372-0485.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On December 27, 2011, Department of Defense 
published a final rule titled DoD Mandatory Declassification Review 
(MDR) Program. Subsequent to the publication of that final rule, 
Department of Defense discovered that paragraph Sec.  222.5(f) in the 
third column of page 80746 should have read Sec.  222.5(j).

Correction

    In the final rule (FR Doc. 2011-33104) published on December 27, 
2011 (76 FR 80744-80747), make the following correction:


Sec.  222.5  [Corrected]

    On page 80746, in Sec.  222.5, in the third column, in the first 
line of the third paragraph, ``(f) MDR Appeals.'' should read ``(j) MDR 
Appeals.''.

    Dated: December 30, 2011.
Aaron Siegel,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 2011-33857 Filed 1-5-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P
### §2921. Energy efficiency targets for data centers

(a) Covered Data Centers.—

(1) For each covered data center, the Secretary of Defense shall—

(A) develop a power usage effectiveness target for the data center, based on location, resiliency, industry standards, and best practices;

(B) develop a water usage effectiveness target for the data center, based on location, resiliency, industry standards, and best practices;

(C) develop other energy efficiency or water usage targets for the data center based on industry standards and best practices, as applicable to meet energy efficiency and resiliency goals;

(D) identify potential renewable or clean energy resources, or related technologies such as advanced battery storage capacity, to enhance resiliency at the data center, including potential renewable or clean energy purchase targets based on the location of the data center; and

(E) identify any statutory, regulatory, or policy barriers to meeting any target under any of subparagraphs (A) through (C).

(2) The Secretary of Defense shall ensure that targets developed under paragraph (1) are consistent with guidance issued by the Secretary of Energy.

(3) In this subsection, the term "covered data center" means a data center of the Department of Defense that—

(A) is one of the 50 data centers of the Department with the highest annual power usage rates; and

(B) has been established before the date of the enactment of this section.

(b) New Data Centers.—(1) Except as provided in paragraph (2), in the case of any Department of Defense data center established on or after the date of the enactment of this section, the Secretary of Defense shall establish energy, water usage, and resiliency-related standards that the data center shall be required to meet based on location, resiliency, industry and Federal standards, and best practices. Such standards shall include—

(A) power usage effectiveness standards;

(B) water usage effectiveness standards; and

(C) any other energy or resiliency standards the Secretary determines are appropriate.

(2) The Secretary may waive the requirement for a Department data center established on or after the date of the enactment of this section to meet the standards established under paragraph (1) if the Secretary—

(A) determines that such waiver is in the national security interest of the United States; and

(B) submits to the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives notice of such waiver and the reasons for such waiver.

(Added Pub. L. 117–81, div. A, title III, §312(a)(1), Dec. 27, 2021, 135 Stat. 1627.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The date of the enactment of this section, referred to in subsecs. (a)(3)(B) and (b), is the date of enactment of Pub. L. 117–81, which was approved Dec. 27, 2021.
#### Benjamin Stern v. Sara Stern.

Motion denied, with ten dollars costs.
# SCOPE 310 AUTHORITY 4129 Helron Drive Bobby R. Bolton President May9, 2012 Mr. Dennis DeVany Chief, Essential Air Service Division Office ofAviation Analysis Department ofTransportation 1200 NewJersey Avenue SE, Washington, D.C. 20590 Florence, Alabama 35630

Reference; DOT-OST-2008-0209, 2001-10685, 2009-0305, 2000-7856 Greenville, MS, Laurel/Hattiesburg, MS, Tupelo, MS and Muscle Shoals, AL EAS Dear Mr. DeVany, Fax: 256-768-0903 Arvy G. 

### Dupuy, III Executive Director

SCOPE 310 in Florence, Alabama wishes to lend its supporttothe proposal ofSilver Airways to provide essential air service at Muscle Shoals, Alabama as replacement for current Delta Air Lines service. Local air service that provides an effective connection to the national and international air transportation system is critical to the economic wellbeing of Shoals Area (Florence, Sheffield, Tuscumbia, and Muscle Shoals), Alabama and to SCOPE 310 in Florence, AL 35630. 1/we at SCOPE 310 rely on our local air service for both business and leisure travel. The Silver Airways proposals offer us a modern 34-seat turboprop aircraft and flights toAtlanta, which is not only the largest hub airport in the world but also a popular business and leisure travel destination from Shoals Area, Alabama in its own right. We believe the Silver air service proposals represent the 

### best option for retaining our local air service longterm and building uptraffic so thatgovernmentsubsidies can eventually be reduced oreliminated. 1/we urgethe DepartmentofTransportationto award SilverAirways thedesignationto provide Shoals Area (Florence, Sheffield, Tuscumbia, and Muscle Shoals essential air service. Best regards,

Paula Michael DirectorofHuman Resources SCOPE 310



### • Serving Colbert, FranklinandLauderdale Counties •
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# U.S. Supports Launch of Philippine E-Licensing Platform for Strategic Goods 

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More
#### In the Matter of the Arbitration between Daniel Mazur, Respondent, and Genesee Valley BOCES, Appellant.

[825 NYS2d 329]

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Frank A. Sedita, Jr., J.), entered July 26, 2005 in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 75. The order, inter alia, vacated an arbitration award and remitted the matter for a new hearing before a different arbitrator on the issue of penalty.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously reversed on the law without costs, the petition is denied, the cross motion is granted and the arbitration award is confirmed.

Memorandum: Petitioner, a tenured administrator employed by respondent, commenced this proceeding pursuant to Education Law § 3020-a (5) and CPLR 7511 challenging his termination following a disciplinary hearing and seeking reinstatement to his former position. Supreme Court erred in granting the petition to the extent of vacating the arbitration award and remitting the matter for a new hearing on the issue of penalty and in denying the cross motion to confirm the award. Substantial evidence supports the Hearing Officer’s determination that petitioner engaged in conduct that was unbecoming an administrator and demonstrated incompetence *(see generally Matter of Hegarty v Board of Educ. of City of N.Y.,*5 AD3d 771, 772 [2004]; *Matter of Carroll [Pirkle],*296 AD2d 755, 756 [2002], *lv dismissed*98 NY2d 764 [2002]). Further, “[i]n light of the litany of specifications proven against him, the penalty of dismissal does not shock the conscience” *(Krinsky v New York City Dept. of Educ.,*28 AD3d 353, 353 [2006]; *see Matter of Morey v Somers Cent. School Dist.,*24 AD3d 558, 559 [2005]). Present—Gorski, J.P., Smith, Centra and Green, JJ.
#### § 12.36 Does other law enforcement training count?

All requests for evaluation of equivalent training must be submitted to the Indian Police Academy for review, with final determination made by the Director. Requests for a waiver of training requirements to use personnel before completing the required courses of instruction must be submitted to the Director and approved or disapproved by the Commissioner of Indian Affairs. In no case will such a waiver allow personnel to be used in any position for more than one year without achieving training standards. Failure to complete basic training requirements will result in removal from a law enforcement position.