alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, D. C. 

RECEIVED 

JUL 1 5 2016 

HEARING DOCKET 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NO. FAA-2016-4268 

PETER HANTZ COMPANY FAA CASE NO. 2012S0700041 

Respondent Judge Douglas M. Rawald 

Complainant and Respondent's Joint Section 13.217/Rule 26(t) Report 

I. Pursuant to 14 C.P.R.§ 13.217 and Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(f), a teleconference was held on June 

27, 2015, and was attended by (I) Ryan Landers, counsel for Complainant, and (2) 

Timothy I. McCulloch, counsel for Respondent. 

2. The parties have discussed settlement, but have not reached a settlement. Settlement 

discussions will continue. 

3. The parties will exchange the discovery disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1) by August 

2, 2016. 

4. The parties agree that initial discovery requests will be made by October 6, 2016. The 

parties will have 30 days to respond to initial discovery requests. 

5. The parties agree that follow-up discovery requests will be made by November 21, 2016. 

The parties will have 30 days to respond to follow-up discovery requests. 

6. Discovery will close on December 30, 2016. 

7. Any objections to discovery requests must be made to the requesting party within ten 

days of receiving the discovery request. 
8. The parties agree that all dispositive motions must be filed by January 30, 2017. The 

parties agree that responses to dispositive motions will be filed by February 21,2017. 

The parties propose April 12, 2017 as a date for a telephonic hearing on any filed 

motions. 

9. The parties agree that they will exchange witness list and exhibits at least 30 days before 

the hearing date. 

I 0. The parties propose the following three trial dates in Phoenix, AZ: 

a. May 22-26, 2017; 

b. June 5-9, 2017; and 

c. June 12-16, 2017. 

Respectfully submitted this Jr:_ day of July, 2016. 

[3~(\ Go]db~1 tJ't· 

:z;{.___~-for 

Ryan M. Landers 

Counsel for Complainant 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that the foregoing Joint Section 13 .217/Rule 26( J) Report was sent via the 

following methods: 

CERTIFIED MAIL: 

Federal Aviation Administration (original and one copy) 

600 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, D.C. 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building- Suite 2W1 000 

CERTIFIED MAIL & FAX: 

The Honorable Douglas M. Rawald 

Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE (Ell-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

facsimile: (202) 366-7536 

Timothy I. McCulloch, Esq. 

Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP 

2375 E. Camelback Rd. 

Suite 750 

Phoenix, AZ 85016 

facsimile: (602) 631-4404 

·51.1ll.M\.S · stant 

Office of e Regional Counsel 

Dated 

(one copy) 

(one copy)
#### Curtis Hankins v. The State.

No. 22994.

Delivered December 13, 1944.

*645The opinion states the case.

*W. T. Link,*of Clarendon, for appellant.

*Ernest S. Goens,*State’s Attorney, of Austin,' for the State.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

Appellant was assessed a fine of one hundred dollars for the offense of selling liquor in a dry area.

The proof was sufficient to sustain the jury’s verdict. Two bills of exception complain of the introduction of evidence. An agent of the Liquor Control Board testified, fixing the time and place of the purchase of liquor from appellant as February twenty-first, 1944, at the Davis Bumper to Bumper filling station. Appellant denied being at such place on said date and in rebuttal offered corroborating evidence on this issue. He testified that the time he was seen there by the Sheriff and a Deputy was another and different date. In an effort to answer this testimony by appellant the State recalled the prosecuting witness who testified that on the night of February twenty-first, 1944, he told the Sheriff that he bought the whiskey “from the defendant, Curtis Hankins, that night.” By the second bill objection is raised to the evidence of the Sheriff regarding the same transaction in which the Sheriff testified that the prosecuting witness told him that he “had just bought it (the whiskey) from the defendant, Curtis Hankins.” In each case the bill says that the evidence was objected to in advance of the answer and that the court was requested to withdraw it from the jury after it was made but that his objections were overruled. The court *646qualifies the bill in each case with a positive contradictory statement. However, appellant objected and excepted to such qualification in each of the bills. The court did not follow this by writing his own bills and they are before us as though no qualifications had been made. Winfrey v. State 65 S. W. (2d) 297.

It will not be necessary to discuss the merit of these bills. Clearly what the witness told the Sheriff about having purchased the liquor from the accused that night, and what the Sheriff testified, detailing the statement made by prosecuting witness on that particular night, was in each case hearsay. The testimony is damaging and the error in admitting-it requires that this case be reversed and remanded for a new trial and it is accordingly so ordered.
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 947

To address resource management issues in Glacier Bay National Park, Alaska.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 2, 1999

Mr. YOUNG of Alaska introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Resources

A BILL

To address resource management issues in Glacier Bay

National Park, Alaska.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Glacier Bay Fisheries

5 Act’’.

6 SEC. 2. RESOURCE HARVESTING.

7 In Glacier Bay National Park, the Secretary of the

8 Interior shall accommodate—

9 (1) the conduct of subsistence fishing and gath10 ering under title VIII of the Alaska National Inter-
2

•HR 947 IH

1 est Lands Conservation Act (16 U.S.C. 3111 et

2 seq.); and

3 (2) the conduct by the State of Alaska, in ac4 cordance with the principles of sustained yield, of

5 marine commercial fisheries, except fishing for Dun6 geness crab in the waters of the Beardslee Islands

7 and upper Dundas Bay.

8 SEC. 3. CLAIMS FOR LOST EARNINGS.

9 Section 3(g) of Public Law 91–383 (16 U.S.C. 1a–

10 2(g)) is amended—

11 (1) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘and’’ at the

12 end;

13 (2) in paragraph (2), by striking the period at

14 the end and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and

15 (3) by inserting after paragraph (2) the follow16 ing:

17 ‘‘(3) to pay an aggregate of not more than

18 $2,000,000 per fiscal year in actual and punitive

19 damages to persons that, at any time after January

20 1, 1999, suffer a loss in earnings from commercial

21 fisheries legally conducted in the marine waters of

22 Glacier Bay National Park, due to any action by an

23 officer, employee, or agent of any Federal depart24 ment or agency, that interferes with any person le-
3

•HR 947 IH

1 gally fishing or attempting to fish in such commer2 cial fisheries.’’.

Æ
# C_2013337EN.01000701.xml

| 19.11.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 337/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.11.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 337/7

---

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the TFEU

Cases where the Commission raises no objections

(Text with EEA relevance, except for products falling under Annex I to the Treaty)

2013/C 337/06

| Date of adoption of the decision | 3.10.2013 |
| --- | --- |
| Reference number of State Aid | SA.36543 (13/N) |
| Member State | United Kingdom |
| Region | — | — |
| Title (and/or name of the beneficiary) | Natural England Management Agreement Scheme |
| Legal basis | | Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981 |

Date of adoption of the decision

3.10.2013

Reference number of State Aid

SA.36543 (13/N)

Member State

United Kingdom

Region

—

—

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

Natural England Management Agreement Scheme

Legal basis

Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981

| | Natural Environment and Rural Communities ACT 2006 |
| --- | --- |

Natural Environment and Rural Communities ACT 2006

Type of measure

Scheme

—

Objective

Agri-environmental commitments

Form of aid

Direct grant

Budget

—

Intensity

100 %

Duration (period)

1.11.2013-31.12.2018

Economic sectors

Crop and animal production, hunting and related service activities

Name and address of the granting authority

| Natural England |
| --- |
| Foundry House |
| 3 Millsands |
| Riverside Exchange |
| Sheffield |
| S3 8NH |
| UNITED KINGDOM |

Natural England

Foundry House

3 Millsands

Riverside Exchange

Sheffield

S3 8NH

UNITED KINGDOM

Other information

—

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

http://ec.europa.eu/competition/elojade/isef/index.cfm

---
H. Res. 217

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

June 23, 1999.

Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it

shall be in order to consider in the House the joint resolution

(H.J. Res. 33) proposing an amendment to the Constitution

of the United States authorizing the Congress to prohibit the

physical desecration of the flag of the United States. The

joint resolution shall be considered as read for amendment.

The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the

joint resolution and any amendment thereto to final passage

without intervening motion except: (1) two hours of debate

equally divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking

minority member of the Committee on the Judiciary; (2) an

amendment in the nature of a substitute, if offered by Representative Conyers of Michigan or his designee, which shall

be considered as read and shall be separately debatable for

one hour equally divided and controlled by the proponent and
2

•HRES 217 EH

an opponent; and (3) one motion to recommit with or without

instructions.

Attest:

Clerk.
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**


**CERTIFICATION
      OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORTS**





Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of The Doe Run Resources
      Corporation (the ‘‘Company’’), does hereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge,
      that:





(a)
      The
      quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended April 30, 2006, of the
      Company as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
      (the “Form 10-Q/A”), fully complies with the


requirements
      of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
      and





(b)
      The
      information contained in the Form 10-Q/A fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.








Date:
      October 19, 2006











By: /s/Theodore P. Fox, III


Theodore
      P. Fox, III


Chief
      Financial Officer


(Principal
      Financial Officer)
#### § 150.104 How does the LTRO maintain the record of title?

The LTRO maintains the record of title electronically. However, certain title documents may exist only as physical copies and not electronically.
#### STATE OF CONNECTICUT *v.*MARK DANIELS

Decided July 13, 2004

*James B. Streeto,*assistant public defender, in support of the petition.

*Lisa A. Riggione,*senior assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 83 Conn. App. 210 (AC 23053), is denied.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# U.S. Air Force Marks First RQ-4 Global Hawk non-military Base Landing at Australia Air Show

By Maj. Ben Sakrisson, 15th Wing Public Affairs

                MELBOURNE, Australia  –              
 

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

PACOM News

articles

U.S. Air Force Marks First RQ-4 Global Hawk non-military Base Landing at Australia Air Show
Exhibit 31.1 

CERTIFICATION 

I, John Meier, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of QuadTechInternational, Inc. for the quarter ended April 30, 2007; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements weremade, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this annual report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of thesmall business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the smallbusiness issuer and have: 

(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the small business issuer is madeknown to us by others, particularly during the period in which this annualreport is being prepared; 

(b) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosurecontrols and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered bythis report based on such evaluation; and 

(c) disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer'sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during the smallbusiness issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, oris reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internalcontrol over financial reporting; and 

5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the auditcommittee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions); 

(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and 

(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internalcontrol over financial reporting. 

June 14, 2007 

 

|  
 "*Signed    J Meier"*
 
*John Meier

President and Chief Executive Officer*
 
  |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


C\_2013205EN.01001201.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 19.7.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 205/12 |

---

Information communicated by Member States regarding State aid granted under Commission Regulation (EC) No 800/2008 declaring certain categories of aid compatible with the common market in application of Articles 87 and 88 of the Treaty (General Block Exemption Regulation)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2013/C 205/06

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Reference number of the State Aid | SA.36218 (13/X) | |
| Member State | Poland | |
| Member State reference number | PL | |
| Name of the Region (NUTS) | Poznański Article 107(3)(a) | |
| Granting authority | | | | --- | | Minister Gospodarki | | Plac Trzech Krzyży 3/5 | | 00-507 Warszawa | | POLSKA/POLAND | | http://www.mg.gov.pl | | |
| Title of the aid measure | Pomoc dla Samsung Electronics Poland Manufacturing Sp. z o.o. | |
| National legal basis (reference to the relevant national official publication) | „Program wspierania inwestycji o istotnym znaczeniu dla gospodarki polskiej na lata 2011–2020”, przyjęty przez Radę Ministrów w dniu 5 lipca 2011 r. (Uchwała Rady Ministrów nr 122/2011) na podstawie art. 19 ust. 2 ustawy z dnia 6 grudnia 2006 r. o zasadach prowadzenia polityki rozwoju (Dz. U. z 2009 r. nr 84, poz. 712 i nr 157, poz. 1241), zmieniony uchwałą Rady Ministrów z dnia 20 marca 2012 r. (nr 39/2012) | |
| Type of measure | Ad hoc aid | |
| Amendment of an existing aid measure | — | |
| Date of granting | From 4.12.2012 | |
| Economic sector(s) concerned | Manufacture of electric domestic appliances, Manufacture of other electrical equipment | |
| Type of beneficiary | Large enterprise — Samsung Electronics Poland Manufacturing Sp. z o.o. | |
| Overall amount of the ad hoc aid awarded to the undertaking | PLN 7,86 million | |
| For guarantees | PLN 7,86 million | |
| Aid instrument (Article 5) | Direct grant | |
| Reference to the Commission Decision | — | |
| If co-financed by Community funds | — | |
| Objectives | Maximum aid intensity in % or maximum aid amount in national currency | SME-bonuses in % |
| Ad hoc aid (Article 13(1)) | 40 % | 0 % |

Web link to the full text of the aid measure:

http://www.mg.gov.pl/Wspieranie+przedsiebiorczosci/Wsparcie+finansowe+i+inwestycje/Pomoc+na+inwestycje+o+istotnym+znaczeniu+dla+gospodarki

---
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# U.S. Embassy Celebrate Malaysian Cadets’ Admission to the U.S. Air Force Academ

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 32 (Wednesday, February 16, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 8999]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-3477]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS


Agenda and Notice of Public Meeting of the Maryland Advisory 
Committee to the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights

    Date and Time: Wednesday, March 2, 2011; 10:30 a.m. EST.
    Place: Via Teleconference. Public Dial in: 1-800-399-0013. 
Conference ID:<greek-i>: 43761282.
    TDD: Dial 711 for relay services and enter 800-399-0013, followed 
by Conference ID:<greek-i>: 43761282.
    Notice is hereby given that an orientation meeting and a planning 
meeting of the Maryland State Advisory Committee to the U.S. Commission 
on Civil Rights will convene via teleconference. The purpose of the 
orientation meeting is to review the rules of operation for this 
federal advisory committee with the newly appointed committee members; 
the purpose of the planning meeting is to plan the committee's future 
activities.
    Members of the public are entitled to submit written comments; the 
comments must be received in the regional office within 30 days after 
the meeting date. Comments may be mailed to the Eastern Regional 
Office, U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, 624 Ninth Street, NW., Suite 
740, Washington, DC 20425. Comments may be faxed to 202-376-7548 or e-
mailed to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#b3d6c1dcf3c6c0d0d0c19dd4dcc5"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="84e1f6ebc4f1f7e7e7f6aae3ebf2">[email protected]</span></a>. Persons who desire additional information may 
contact the Eastern Regional Office by e-mail at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#4623342906333525253468212930"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="f396819cb38680909081dd949c85">[email protected]</span></a> or by 
phone at 202-376-7533.
    Records generated from this meeting may be inspected and reproduced 
at the Eastern Regional Office, as they become available, both before 
and after the meeting. Persons interested in the work of this advisory 
committee are directed to the Commission's Web site, http://www.usccr.gov, or may contact the Eastern Regional Office at the above 
e-mail or street address.
    To ensure that the Commission secures an appropriate number of 
telephone lines for the public, persons are asked to contact the 
Eastern Regional Office by February 21, 2011 either by e-mail at 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#8aeff8e5cafff9e9e9f8a4ede5fc"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="1174637e5164627272633f767e67">[email protected]</span></a>, or by phone at 202-376-7533.
    The meeting will be conducted pursuant to the rules and regulations 
of the Commission and FACA.

    Dated in Washington, DC, February 11, 2011.
Peter Minarik,
Acting Chief, Regional Programs Coordination Unit.
[FR Doc. 2011-3477 Filed 2-15-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6335-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>