alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 134

Supporting National Civility Week, Inc. in its efforts to restore civility,

honesty, integrity, and respectful consideration in the United States.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 25, 1999

Mr. LANTOS (for himself, Mr. SAWYER, and Mr. LAHOOD) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Government

Reform

RESOLUTION

Supporting National Civility Week, Inc. in its efforts to

restore civility, honesty, integrity, and respectful consideration in the United States.

Whereas our civilization is founded upon the values of honesty, courtesy, and respectful consideration among its

citizens;

Whereas we seek to teach and reaffirm these fundamental

values of civility;

Whereas a lack of civility in recent years has become frighteningly apparent, as seen in media tales of road rage and

school violence, of personal deceit and public corruption;

Whereas common courtesy has become bewilderingly uncommon;
2

•HRES 134 IH

Whereas a large part of many Americans’ behavior can be

traced to a failure to honor the codes of civil conduct that

have governed society for many generations;

Whereas the teaching of courtesy has declined while the celebration of vulgarity and effrontery has increased;

Whereas many Americans have ceased to honor the good examples that surround them;

Whereas, in this context, too many people find it easy to

manifest disrespect for other age groups, races, and religions;

Whereas National Civility Week, Inc. is a nonpartisan and

nonprofit corporation devoted to reintroducing civility in

our Nation;

Whereas National Civility Week, Inc. has established the

third week of September as National Civility Week in an

effort to reaffirm society’s commitment to adhere to wellestablished rules of civil conduct;

Whereas National Civility Week will honor those who practice

common decency and simple honesty; and

Whereas National Civility Week will draw attention to the behaviors and standards that we respect as a people, and

will celebrate the conduct that ties together the threads

of our social fabric: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives supports

2 these efforts to restore civility, honesty, integrity, and re3 spectful consideration in the United States.

Æ
§ 11.906 Rights of parties. ( a ) In all hearings and proceedings under §§ 11.900-11.1114 of this part the following rights will be observed unless modified by the particular section describing a hearing or proceeding: ( 1 ) Notice of the hearing or proceeding shall be given the minor, his or her parents, guardian or custodian and their counsel. The notice shall be delivered by certified mail. The notice shall contain: ( i ) The name of the court;
( ii ) The title of the proceeding; and
( iii ) The date, time and place of the proceeding.
( b ) The children's court magistrate shall inform the minor and his or her parents, guardian or custodian of their right to retain counsel, and, in juvenile delinquency proceedings, shall tell them: “You have a right to have a lawyer or other person represent you at this proceeding. If you cannot afford to hire counsel, the court will appoint counsel for you.”
( c ) If the children's court magistrate believes there is a potential conflict of interest between the minor and his or her parents, guardian, or custodian with respect to legal representation, the court shall appoint another person to act as counsel for the minor.
( d ) The minor need not be a witness against, nor otherwise incriminate, himself or herself.
( e ) The children's court shall give the minor, and the minor's parent, guardian or custodian the opportunity to introduce evidence, to be heard on their own behalf and to examine witnesses.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 January 29, 2016

s0126

Order 

Clerk

January 29, 2016

152114

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 152114

COA: 319942

Kent CC: 12-006969-FC

HENRY RICHARD HARPER,

Defendant-Appellee.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 11, 2015 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.305(H)(1), in 

lieu of granting leave to appeal, we VACATE that part of the Court of Appeals opinion 

holding that it cannot be concluded that the two separate assaults constituted part of the 

“same transaction” under MCL 750.520b(3). We agree, however, that the sentencing 

judge failed to identify specific evidence from which one could conclude that the 

imposition of consecutive sentences was warranted. We therefore REMAND this case to 

the Kent Circuit Court. On remand, the trial court shall either issue an order that provides 

a basis for its conclusion that the two criminal offenses arose from the same transaction, 

or impose concurrent sentences. 

We do not retain jurisdiction.
ANNUAL STATEMENT AS TO COMPLIANCE



The undersigned, David Co, a Director of Deutsche Bank Trust Company
Americas, as the Custodian (a “Certifying Servicer”) under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, dated
as of December 1, 2011 (the “Agreement”), by and among, Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Securities Inc., as Depositor,
Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer, Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association,
as Special Servicer, Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as Trustee, Certificate Administrator, Paying Agent and Custodian, and
Trimont Real Estate Advisors, Inc., as Operating Advisor here by certifies in accordance with Section 10.11 of the Agreement:



| | A) | A review of such Certifying Servicer’s activities during the preceding calendar year and of such Certifying Servicer’s
performance under the Agreement has been made under such officer’s supervision and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | B) | That, as to the best of such officer’s knowledge, based on such review, such Certifying Servicer has fulfilled all its
obligations under the Agreement, in all material respects during the preceding calendar year.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



DEUTSCHE BANK TRUST COMPANY AMERICAS

as Custodian



/s/ David Co

BY: David Co

Title: Director

Date: March 11, 2013
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION OF CO-CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

** PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES‐OXLEY ACTOF 2002**

I, Michael A. Reisner, Co-Chief Executive Officer and Co-President, in connection with the Annual Report of CĪON Investment Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015, asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “AnnualReport”), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

 

1.       The Annual Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

2.       The informationcontained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

Date:March 11, 2016

|   |                                                                                                                      |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | /s/ Michael A. Reisner

Michael  A. Reisner  Co-Chief Executive Officer and Co-President

*(Principal Executive Officer)* |
|   | CĪON  Investment Corporation                                                                                         |

 

 

----
### -82 -80 -78 -76 38 40 

## ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



## ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 

### 500 1000 1500 1000 18 12 06 00 05/26 

## NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

# Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 26 May 07

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 38.77 N 77.11 WMeters AGL
#### § 117.22 Disbursements to legal guardians.

Any disbursement authorized to be made to an Indian by the regulations of this part may, when the Indian is under guardianship, be made by the superintendent to the guardian. All expenditures by a guardian of the funds of his ward must be approved in writing by the court and the superintendent.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 230 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                         June 30, 1999.
    Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker 
may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule XVIII, declare the House resolved into the 
Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of the 
bill (H.R. 66) to preserve the cultural resources of the Route 66 corridor and 
to authorize the Secretary of the Interior to provide assistance. The first 
reading of the bill shall be dispensed with. General debate shall be confined to 
the bill and shall not exceed one hour equally divided and controlled by the 
chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on Resources. After 
general debate the bill shall be considered for amendment under the five-minute 
rule. It shall be in order to consider as an original bill for the purpose of 
amendment under the five-minute rule the amendment in the nature of a substitute 
recommended by the Committee on Resources now printed in the bill. Each section 
of the committee amendment in the nature of a substitute shall be considered as 
read. During consideration of the bill for amendment, the Chairman of the 
Committee of the Whole may accord priority in recognition on the basis of 
whether the Member offering an amendment has caused it to be printed in the 
portion of the Congressional Record designated for that purpose in clause 8 of 
rule XVIII. Amendments so printed shall be considered as read. The Chairman of 
the Committee of the Whole may: (1) postpone until a time during further 
consideration in the Committee of the Whole a request for a recorded vote on any 
amendment; and (2) reduce to five minutes the minimum time for electronic voting 
on any postponed question that follows another electronic vote without 
intervening business, provided that the minimum time for electronic voting on 
the first in any series of questions shall be 15 minutes. At the conclusion of 
consideration of the bill for amendment the Committee shall rise and report the 
bill to the House with such amendments as may have been adopted. Any Member may 
demand a separate vote in the House on any amendment adopted in the Committee of 
the Whole to the bill or to the committee amendment in the nature of a 
substitute. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill and 
amendments thereto to final passage without intervening motion except one motion 
to recommit with or without instructions.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
EXHIBIT 32. - Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
              Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.


                    CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Australian-Canadian Oil
Royalties Ltd. (the "Company") for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2010, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), Andre Sakhai, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
and Mahnaz Nourmand, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of their knowledge, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


Dated: August 2, 2010             /s/ ANDRE SAKHAI
                                  -------------------
                                  Andre Sakhai, President  &
                                  Chief Executive Officer



Dated: August 2, 2010             /s/ MAHNAZ NOURMAND
                                  --------------------
                                  Mahnaz Nourmand, Chief Financial Officer



This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
### §10203. Reserve affairs: designation of general or flag officer of each armed force

(a) The Secretary of the Army may designate a general officer of the Army to be directly responsible for reserve affairs to the Chief of Staff of the Army.

(b) The Secretary of the Navy may designate a flag officer of the Navy to be directly responsible for reserve affairs to the Chief of Naval Operations and a general officer of the Marine Corps to be directly responsible for reserve affairs to the Commandant of the Marine Corps.

(c) The Secretary of the Air Force may designate a general officer of the Air Force to be directly responsible for reserve affairs to the Chief of Staff of the Air Force.

(d) The Secretary of Homeland Security may designate a flag officer of the Coast Guard to be directly responsible for reserve affairs to the Commandant of the Coast Guard.

(e) This section does not affect the functions of the Chief of the National Guard Bureau, the Chief of Army Reserve, or the Chief of Air Force Reserve.

(Added Pub. L. 103–337, div. A, title XVI, §1661(a)(1), Oct. 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 2976; amended Pub. L. 107–296, title XVII, §1704(b)(1), Nov. 25, 2002, 116 Stat. 2314.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

Provisions similar to those in this section were contained in section 264(a) of this title, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 103–337, §1661(a)(2)(A).

#### Amendments

2002—Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 107–296 substituted "of Homeland Security" for "of Transportation".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2002 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 107–296 effective on the date of transfer of the Coast Guard to the Department of Homeland Security, see section 1704(g) of Pub. L. 107–296, set out as a note under section 101 of this title.

#### Effective Date

Section effective Dec. 1, 1994, except as otherwise provided, see section 1691 of Pub. L. 103–337, set out as a note under section 10001 of this title.
### **CHAPTER 38—JOINT OFFICER MANAGEMENT**

Sec.
661.
Management policies for joint qualified officers.
662.
Promotion policy objectives for joint officers.
663.
Joint duty assignments after completion of joint professional military education.
664.
Length of joint duty assignments.
665.
Procedures for monitoring careers of joint qualified officers.
666.
Reserve officers not on the active-duty list.
[667.
Repealed.]
668.
Definitions.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**2014**—Pub. L. 113–291, div. A, title V, §505(b), Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3356, struck out item 667 "Annual report to Congress".

**2008**—Pub. L. 110–417, [div. A], title V, §522(a)(3), (c)(3), Oct. 14, 2008, 122 Stat. 4445, added items 661 and 665 and struck out former items 661 "Management policies for officers who are joint qualified" and 665 "Procedures for monitoring careers of joint officers".

**2006**—Pub. L. 109–364, div. A, title V, §516(e)(2), Oct. 17, 2006, 120 Stat. 2189, substituted "officers who are joint qualified" for "joint specialty officers" in item 661.

**2004**—Pub. L. 108–375, div. A, title V, §532(c)(2)(B), Oct. 28, 2004, 118 Stat. 1900, substituted "Joint duty assignments after completion of joint professional military education" for "Education" in item 663.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News

South Korea’s largest air exercise proves ‘Accept Follow-on Forces’ missionApril 22, 2024 — A crucial aspect of any exercise for the 8th Fighter Wing is the reception of forces, and that was no different as the Wolf Pack hosts the largest air exercise in the Republic of Korea... MORE 

----

2024 (327)2023 (825)2022 (1193)2021 (1066)2020 (1083)2019 (1166)2018 (1116)2017 (1356)2016 (1475)2015 (1408)2014 (904)2013 (32)2012 (4)

About DoDDoD CareersJoin the MilitaryNewsUSA.govPhotos & VideosPrivacy & SecurityTop Issues

US INDOPACOM Inspector GeneralDoD Inspector General Accessibility/Section 508DoD FOIAUS INDOPACOM FOIALink DisclaimerNo FEAR ActRecovery ActINDOPACOM Webmaster

                  - Facebook
                  - X
                  - YouTube
                  - Instagram
                  - RSS

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
### §1524. Posthumous commissions and warrants: determination of date of death

For the purposes of sections 1521 and 1522 of this title, in any case where the date of death is established or determined under section 551–558 of title 37, the date of death is the date the Secretary concerned receives evidence that the person is dead, or the date the finding of death is made under section 555 of title 37.

(Added Pub. L. 89–718, §12(a)(1), Nov. 2, 1966, 80 Stat. 1117.)
The State of TexasAppellee/s

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

August 5, 2014

No. 04-13-00339-CR

Elias Esequiel VASQUEZ,

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

From the 229th Judicial District Court, Starr County, Texas

Trial Court No. 11-CRS-272

Honorable Ana Lisa Garza, Judge Presiding

ORDER

Appellant’s brief was originally due on April 9, 2014. Appellant has been granted three 

extensions of time—for a total of 110 days—in which to file the brief. Our last order stated that 

no further extensions of time would be granted. Despite this admonition, appellant has filed a 

fourth motion for extension of time requesting an additional 14-day extension. 

The motion is GRANTED. We ORDER appellant’s attorney to file the appellant’s brief 

on or before August 13, 2014. No further extensions of time will be considered. If appellant’s 

brief is not filed by that date, we will abate this appeal to the trial court for an abandonment 

hearing. TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(b)(2). Contempt proceedings may also be initiated against 

appellant’s attorney. Id. 38.8(b)(4). 

_________________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 5th day of August, 2014.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 94

To repeal the provision of law under which pay for Members of Congress

is automatically adjusted.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 6, 1999

Mr. COBLE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Government Reform, and in addition to the Committee on House Administration, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker,

in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

A BILL

To repeal the provision of law under which pay for Members

of Congress is automatically adjusted.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. REPEAL.

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (2) of section 601(a)

5 of the Legislative Reorganization Act of 1946 (2 U.S.C.

6 31) is repealed.

7 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—Section 601(a)(1)

8 of such Act is amended—

9 (1) by striking ‘‘(a)(1)’’ and inserting ‘‘(a)’’;
2

•HR 94 IH

1 (2) by redesignating subparagraphs (A), (B),

2 and (C) as paragraphs (1), (2), and (3), respectively;

3 and

4 (3) by striking ‘‘, as adjusted by paragraph (2)

5 of this subsection’’.

Æ