alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 34.2 

KPMG LLP 

303 East Wacker Drive 

Chicago, IL 60601-5212 

**Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

The Board of Directors 

Citibank, N.A.: 

We have examinedmanagement’s assertion, included in the accompanying Management’s Assertion of Compliance, that the Agency and Trust division of Citibank, N.A. (the “Company”) complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d)of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB for publicly-issued (i.e., transaction-level reporting initially required under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) and certain privately issued (i.e., for whichtransaction-level reporting is required pursuant to contractual obligation) automobile loan or lease-backed securities, equipment loan-backed securities and student loan-backed securities issued on or after January 1, 2006 for which the Companyprovides trustee and paying agent services (the “Platform”), except for servicing criteria 1122(d)(1)(i)-1122(d)(1)(iv), 1122(d)(2)(i), 1122(d)(2)(iii), 1122(d)(2)(vi)-1122(d)(2)(vii), 1122(d)(3)(i) and 1122(d)(4)(i)-1122(d)(4)(xv), whichthe Company has determined are not applicable to the activities it performs with respect to the Platform, as of and for the twelve months ended December 31, 2012. Management is responsible for the Company’s compliance with the servicingcriteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management’s assertion about the Company’s compliance based on our examination. 

Our examination was conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about theCompany’s compliance with the servicing criteria specified above and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing selected asset-backed transactions and securities thatcomprise the Platform, testing selected servicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whether the Company processed those selected transactions and performed those selected activities in compliance with the servicing criteria.Furthermore, our procedures were limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report. Our procedures were not designed to determine whether errors may have occurred eitherprior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report for the selected transactions or any other transactions. We believe that ourexamination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria. 

In our opinion, management’s assertion that the Company complied with the aforementioned servicing criteria as of and for the twelve months ended December 31, 2012 is fairly stated, in allmaterial respects. 

/s/ KPMG LLP 

Chicago, Illinois 

February 28, 2013
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


C\_2013182EN.01000402.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 27.6.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 182/4 |

---

Notification of the Hungarian Government pursuant to Article 10(2) of Directive 2009/73/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (‘Gas Directive’) concerning common rules for the internal market in natural gas regarding the designation of FGSZ Natural Gas Transmission Closed Company Limited, FGSZ Zrt. as a transmission system operator in Hungary — Gas TSO

2013/C 182/05

Following the Hungarian regulatory authority's final decision of 7 February 2012 regarding the certification of FGSZ Natural Gas Transmission Closed Company Limited, FGSZ Zrt. as independent transmission operator (Chapter IV of the Gas Directive), Hungary has notified to the Commission the official approval and designation of this company as a transmission system operator operating in Hungary in accordance with Article 10 of the Gas Directive.

Any additional information can be obtained from the website of the Hungarian Energy Office as well as from that of FGSZ:

decisions of the Hungarian Energy Office on the certification of FGSZ Zrt.:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | http://fgsz.hu/en/content/company |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | http://fgsz.hu/sites/default/files/dokumentumok/jogszabalyok/MEH-hat\_34\_2012.pdf |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | http://www.eh.gov.hu/gcpdocs/65/A%20BIZOTTSÁG%20VÉLEMÉNYE\_Brüsszel%202011.12.6%20C2011%208984%20végleges.pdf |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | http://www.eh.gov.hu/gcpdocs/65/FGSZ%20Tanúsítás%20Végső%20határozat%2034\_2012.pdf |

---
CONFIDENTIAL 

24July 2014 

Drug Enforcement Admin istration 

Attn: DEA Federal Register Representative/ODW 

870 1 Morrissette Drive 

Springfield, VA 22152 

Cerilliant· 

Analytical Reference Standards 

Subject: Comment on Proposed 2015 Aggregate Production Quotas 

Docket No. DEA-393 

Dear Sir/Madam: 

811 PALOMA DRIVE , SUITE A, ROUND ROCK , TEXAS 78665 

P 512/ 238-9974 I 800/ 848-7837 I 512/ 238-9129 I 800/654-1458 I 
CONFIDENTIAL 

~ Cerilliante 

Analytical Reference Standards 

811 PALOMA DRIVE , SUITE A, ROUND ROCK, TE XAS 78665 

512/238-9974 I 800/848-7837 I 512/238-9 129 I 800/654-1458 I 
istration 

ter Representative/ODW 
..,, • -<O .- H:iJD l(J'I c ..,. n .- 0 en ..,. m <: m3::u ::D -1mm 

::u -I ::z: m-1 ..... 

% F (") -- N ..,. 

,. '" ;;;; ....... c ::D -I 

, .. .:;;=-! ::ucm 3 ::u r- ..... 

• c:= r-CS> ::z: ::u :a ,..., _, m () t;:;2 I ..... C) -u .... ::u _ .... m 

..,. 

m 

::z: 

-I 

-c:: r- ::D 

I N ...... c .,, -I 

(/) ......... N ..... <: 

1-t .... ...... -- m 

DVI GliLJ 

CN --I :::I> )( 

.Jl3111385238126 51BC2/ED4F'/6F'l!l3 

oma Or., 

A, Shipping Request/Packing List 

Rock, TX 78665 

38-9974 

48-7837 

Ship To: 

Request No. 2- 2588 Date 7/23/2014 

ATTN: DEA Federal Register Representative/ODW 

Drug Enforcement Administration 

8701 Morrissette Drive 

 Springfield, VA 22152 

202-598-6812 

Shipping Instructions 

Cll-J 0 

ro :u 

(Jl D Ul (Jl 

(11 

-

0 

"' ' 

z 

w 

ISl 

I 

(11 a; 

(Jl 

"" ODCll DOI r 

r .. E:'U . Cl . 

en 

rn IV ·· D 

z ro 

0 WISlln 

rn lO · . . 

:u "'"' -rw ISl "' 

(")[!Ot... 

D C 

-n r 

rn -

"' .i> ..... 

ISl 

.i>
#### Roberta Martin, Respondent, v New York Hospital Medical Center of Queens, Appellant.

[826 NYS2d 85]

In an action, inter alia, to enjoin the defendant from interfering with the plaintiffs continued use of an easement, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Nelson, J.), dated January 26, 2006, which denied its motion pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (1) and (7) to dismiss the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court correctly denied that branch of the defendant’s motion which was to dismiss the complaint on the ground that a defense is founded upon documentary evidence *(see*CPLR 3211 [a] [1]). “ ‘To succeed on a motion to dismiss pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (1), the documentary evidence that forms the basis of the defense must be such that it resolves all factual issues as a matter of law, and conclusively disposes of the plaintiffs claim’ ” *(M. Fund, Inc. v Carter,*31 AD3d 620 [2006], quoting *Trade Source v Westchester Wood Works,*290 AD2d 437, 438 [2002]; *see Leon v Martinez,*84 NY2d 83, 88 [1994]). The documentary evidence submitted by the defendant, namely the parties’ agreement dated June 18, 2003, failed to resolve all factual issues as a matter of law and to conclusively dispose of the plaintiffs claim. This agreement did not establish that the plaintiff consented to the installation of the subject railing.

Moreover, the Supreme Court properly denied that branch of the defendant’s motion which was to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a cause of action *(see*CPLR 3211 [a] [7]). In reviewing a motion pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (7) to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a cause of action, the facts as alleged in the complaint must be accepted as true, the plaintiff *651is accorded the benefit of every possible favorable inference, and the court’s function is to determine only whether the facts as alleged fit within any cognizable legal theory *(see Sokoloff v Harriman Estates Dev. Corp.,*96 NY2d 409, 414 [2001]; *Leon v Martinez, supra*at 87-88; *Lupski v County of Nassau,*32 AD3d 997 [2006]; *Richmond Shop Smart, Inc. v Kenbar Dev. Ctr., LLC,*32 AD3d 423 [2006]; *Simmons v Edelstein,*32 AD3d 464 [2006]). In this regard, “the criterion is whether the proponent of the pleading has a cause of action, not whether he [or she] has stated one” *(Guggenheimer v Ginzburg,*43 NY2d 268, 275 [1977]; *see Leon v Martinez, supra*at 88). “ ‘To acquire an easement by prescription, it must be shown that the use was hostile, open and notorious, and continuous and uninterrupted for the prescriptive period’ of 10 years” *(Morales v Riley,*28 AD3d 623, 623 [2006], quoting *Asche v Land & Bldg. Known as 64-29 232nd St.,*12 AD3d 386, 387 [2004]). Applying these principles, the plaintiff alleged a cause of action for a prescriptive easement.

The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Adams, J.E, Rivera, Skelos and Lifson, JJ., concur.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

# George Washington Carrier Strike Group Arrived in Singapore for a Goodwill Port Visit

By Mass Communication Specialist 3rd Class Paolo BayasUSS George Washington Public Affairs

                SINGAPORE  –              

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

pacom

news

articles
REPORT ON ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION’S REGULATION AB SERVICING CRITERIA





For the calendar year ending December
31, 2016, National Tax Search, LLC has been a Tax Service Vendor for Wells Fargo Bank (the “Servicer”).



National Tax Search, LLC (“NTS”)
is responsible for assessing compliance as of December 31, 2016 and for the period from January 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016
(the “Reporting Period”) with the servicing criteria set forth in Title 17, Section 229.1122(d) of the Code of Federal
Regulations (the “CFR”). NTS has used the servicing criteria communicated to NTS by the Servicer to assess compliance
with the applicable servicing criteria. Only servicing criteria 1122(d)(l)(ii), 1122(d)1(iv), 1122(d)2(ii), 1122(d)2(v), 1122(d)2(vi),
1122(d)(4)(xi), and 1122(d)(4)(xii) (the “Applicable Servicing Criteria”) are applicable to the activities NTS performs
with respect to the transactions covered by this report. NTS has determined that the remaining servicing criteria set forth in
Item 1122 (d) of the SEC Regulation AB are not applicable to the activities it performs with respect to the transactions covered
by this report. The transactions covered by this report include all tax payments made on behalf of the Servicer using NTS’s
TaxQ system (the “Platform Transactions”).



NTS, as a vendor, has assessed its
compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria for the Reporting Period and has concluded that NTS has complied, in all material
respects, with the Applicable Servicing Criteria as of December 31, 2016 and for the Reporting Period with respect to the Platform
Transactions taken as a whole.



Plante & Moran, PLLC, an independent
registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report on the assessment of compliance with the Applicable Servicing
Criteria as of December 31, 2016 and for the Reporting Period as set forth in this assertion.



National Tax Search, LLC, as Vendor
to Servicer





/s/ Lori D. Eshoo

Lori D. Eshoo, President/CEO
January 23, 2017
# C_2017285EN.01038001.xml

| 29.8.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 285/380 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.8.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 285/380

---

P7_TA(2014)0136

EC-Costa Rica, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, Nicaragua and Panama Political Dialogue and Cooperation Agreement, as regards Article 49(3) thereof ***

European Parliament legislative resolution of 26 February 2014 on the draft Council decision on the conclusion on behalf of the European Union of the Political Dialogue and Cooperation Agreement between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and the Republics of Costa Rica, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, Nicaragua and Panama, of the other part, as regards Article 49(3) thereof (12400/2013 — C7-0426/2013 — 2012/0219B(NLE))

(Consent)

(2017/C 285/43)

The European Parliament,

The European Parliament

| — | having regard to the draft Council decision (12400/2013), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the draft Council decision (12400/2013),

| — | having regard to the Political Dialogue and Cooperation Agreement between the European Community and its Members States, of the one part, and the Republics of Costa Rica, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, Nicaragua and Panama, of the other part (13368/2012), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the Political Dialogue and Cooperation Agreement between the European Community and its Members States, of the one part, and the Republics of Costa Rica, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, Nicaragua and Panama, of the other part (13368/2012),

| — | having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Article 79(3) and Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (a), of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C7-0426/2013), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Article 79(3) and Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (a), of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C7-0426/2013),

| — | having regard to Rules 81 and 90(7) of its Rules of Procedure, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Rules 81 and 90(7) of its Rules of Procedure,

| — | having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs (A7-0119/2014), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs (A7-0119/2014),

| 1. | Consents to the conclusion of the Agreement; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Consents to the conclusion of the Agreement;

| 2. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission, and the governments and parliaments of the Member States and of the Republics of Costa Rica, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, Nicaragua and Panama. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission, and the governments and parliaments of the Member States and of the Republics of Costa Rica, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, Nicaragua and Panama.

---
# C_2013064EN.01000301.xml

| 5.3.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 64/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.3.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 64/3

---

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the TFEU

Cases where the Commission raises no objections

(Text with EEA relevance, except for products falling under Annex I to the Treaty)

2013/C 64/04

| Date of adoption of the decision | 1.2.2013 |
| --- | --- |
| Reference number of State Aid | SA.35133 (12/N) |
| Member State | Ireland |
| Region | — | Mixed |
| Title (and/or name of the beneficiary) | Teagasc Joint Pig Programme |
| Legal basis | Enabling Provisions in Section 37 of the Bord Bia Act 1994 |
| Type of measure | Scheme | — |
| Objective | Research and development, Technical support (AGRI) |
| Form of aid | Subsidized services, Direct grant |
| Budget | | Overall budget: EUR 1,75 million |

Date of adoption of the decision

1.2.2013

Reference number of State Aid

SA.35133 (12/N)

Member State

Ireland

Region

—

Mixed

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

Teagasc Joint Pig Programme

Legal basis

Enabling Provisions in Section 37 of the Bord Bia Act 1994

Type of measure

Scheme

—

Objective

Research and development, Technical support (AGRI)

Form of aid

Subsidized services, Direct grant

Budget

Overall budget: EUR 1,75 million

| | Annual budget: EUR 0,35 million |
| --- | --- |

Annual budget: EUR 0,35 million

Intensity

100 %

Duration (period)

Until 31.12.2017

Economic sectors

Animal production

Name and address of the granting authority

| Deparment of Agriculture, Food and the Marine |
| --- |
| Agriculture House |
| Kildare Street |
| Dublin 2 |
| IRELAND |

Deparment of Agriculture, Food and the Marine

Agriculture House

Kildare Street

Dublin 2

IRELAND

Other information

—

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

http://ec.europa.eu/competition/elojade/isef/index.cfm

---
#### § 170.441 Can a decision resulting from a hearing be appealed?

Yes. A decision resulting from the public hearing may be appealed under 25 CFR part 2.
H. Res. 204

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

June 9, 1999.

Resolved, That the following named Members be, and are

hereby, elected to the following standing committees of the

House of Representatives:

COMMITTEE ON RESOURCES: Mr. Holt of New Jersey.

COMMITTEE ON SCIENCE: Mr. Baird of Washington, Mr.

Hoeffel of Pennsylvania, and Mr. Moore of Kansas.

COMMITTEE ON VETERANS’ AFFAIRS: Mr. Hill of Indiana and Mr. Udall of New Mexico.

Attest:

Clerk.
EXHIBIT 31.1 -- Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Bernard Lipton, Chief Financial Officer, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Australian-Canadian
Oil Royalties Ltd.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the period presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and I have:

      (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

      (b) (This paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Releases Nos. 33-8238 and
34-47986;)

      (c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

      (d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing equivalent function):

      (a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls that could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

      (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.


Date: November 17, 2006                  /s/ BERNARD LIPTON
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                         Bernard Lipton, Chief Financial Officer
### SUBCHAPTER II—COMPOSITION OF MILITARY COMMISSIONS

Sec.
948h.
Who may convene military commissions.
948i.
Who may serve on military commissions.
948j.
Military judge of a military commission.
948k.
Detail of trial counsel and defense counsel.
948 l.
Detail or employment of reporters and interpreters.
948m.
Number of members; excuse of members; absent and additional members.