alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Avalon Holdings Corporation on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Ronald E. Klingle,
Chief Executive Officer of Avalon Holdings Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Avalon Holdings Corporation.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Ronald E. Klingle  
|Ronald E. Klingle      
|Chief Executive Officer
|August 12, 2005        



24
National Cancer Institute

U.S. DEPARTMENT 

OF HEALTH AND 

HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes

of Health

Managing Chemotherapy Side Effects

Fatigue

(Feeling weak and 

very tired)

Tell your doctor or nurse if: ● You are not able to do your 

normal activities

● You are still very tired, even 

after resting or sleeping

Why do I feel so tired?

Chemotherapy can make you tired. So 

can other things like anemia, which 

is a low red blood cell count. Being 

depressed or in pain, taking certain 

medicines, or having trouble sleeping 

can also make you feel tired.

Make a plan to feel 

less tired. 

Do less. Let others help you. ● Do activities that are most 

important first.

● Ask others for help. ● Take time off from your job, or work 

fewer hours.

Many people find it helpful to 

keep track of their energy level. 

Some people write down how 

they are feeling each day in a 

notebook to share with their 

doctor. Others use their smart 

phone or a computer. Tracking 

can help you and your doctor 

figure out how to manage or 

treat your fatigue.

“I was so tired. It was hard to do even 

simple things. My nurse said to stay as 

active as I could. I found that taking short 

walks each morning gave me more energy 

during the day.” 
Revised February 2012

How can we help?

National Cancer Institute’s Cancer Information Service

Phone: 1-800-422-6237 (1-800-4-CANCER)

Web: www.cancer.gov

Online Chat: www.cancer.gov/livehelp

NCI has a series of 18 Chemotherapy Side Effects Sheets at:

www.cancer.gov/chemo-side-effects

Managing Chemotherapy Side Effects: Fatigue (Feeling weak and very tired)

Eat and drink well.

● Make healthy foods when you feel well. 

Freeze them to eat later.

● Eating helps you keep up your strength. 

Some people find it easier to eat 5 or 6 small 

meals or healthy snacks instead of 3 big 

meals.

● Most people need to drink at least 8 cups of 

water a day. Keep water with you and take 

small sips during the day.

Be as active as you can.

● Try to exercise every day. Even 15 to 30 

minutes a day can help give you energy.

● Take a walk or ride an exercise bike.

● Ask your doctor or nurse about other 

exercises that can help. Stretching, yoga, or 

Tai Chi help some people.

Take time to rest.

● Listen to your body. Rest when you feel tired.

● Try to take short naps that are 1 hour or less, 

during the day. 

● Make a bedtime routine. Bathing or listening 

to music before you go to sleep may help 

you relax.

● Sleep at least 8 hours every night. 

Questions to ask 

your doctor or nurse:

1. What problems should I call you about?

2. What medicine or treatments can help me?

3. What foods and drinks are best for me? 

4. How much liquid should I drink each day?

5. What exercises can help me feel better?

6. How should I track my energy level? What 

should I write down and share with you?
#### Horace Dearman v. The State.

No. 22827.

Delivered April 19, 1944.

Rehearing Denied May 24, 1944.

The opinion states the case.

*James Ingram,*of Houston, for appellant.

*Ernest S. Goens,*State’s Attorney, of Austin, for the State.

DAVIDSON, Judge.

*309Appellant was convicted of possessing whisky for the purpose of sale in a wet area, without a permit, and his punishment was assessed at 90 days in jail.

In Anderson v. State, 172 S. W. (2d) 310, we held that such was an offense under Art. 666-4, P. C.

An agent of the Texas Liquor Control Board searched appellant’s home and found therein a large quantity of wine and whiskey. According to the testimony of said agent, appellant admitted to him that he sold wine and whisky there at his home. Appellant had no license to so sell.

Appellant admitted the possession of the liquors, but contended that he possessed same for his own use and not for the purpose of sale.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by a majority of the Court.

GRAVES, Judge.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

My views in regard to the question were expressed in a dissenting opinion in Anderson v. State, 172 S. W. (2d) 310, and are adhered to; therefore I dissent in the present case.

HAWKINS, Presiding Judge.

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING.

HAWKINS, Presiding Judge.

Appellant bases his motion for rehearing upon the proposition that the only evidence which sustained the conviction was appellant’s statement to the officers that he had been selling wine and whisky; that such statement was an extrajudicial confession which standing alone would not support a conviction. The evidence shows that a witness was present when the officers searched appellant’s house and arrested him, and that this witness told the officers in appellant’s presence that he had sold the witness a drink of wine for twenty-five cents. It is true that upon the trial appellant denied this, and also denied *310admitting sales to the officers, and claimed that he had the liquor for his personal use. The officers found 157 bottles of wine, each containing 4/5 of a quart, and eight 1/2 pint bottles of whisky. The quantity of liquor on hand' was enough to cast suspicion upon appellant’s claim that he had it for his own personal use, and supported the truthfulness of his admission that he had been selling it.

The motion for rehearing is overruled.

It is not to be understood that in writing this opinion for the court the writer in any way recedes from the views expressed in his dissenting opinion in Anderson v. State, 172 S. W. (2d) 310.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly  Report of Hometown Auto  Retailers,  Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-Q for the period  ending March 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Charles
F. Schwartz,  Chief Financial  Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  ss. 1350, as adopted  pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.


/s/ Charles F. Schwartz
------------------------------
Charles F. Schwartz
Chief Financial Officer
May 13, 2004

                                       26
### §12308. Retention after becoming qualified for retired pay

Any person who has qualified for retired pay under chapter 1223 of this title may, with his consent and by order of the Secretary concerned, be retained on active duty, or in service in a reserve component other than that listed in section 12732(b) of this title. A member so retained shall be credited with that service for all purposes.

(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 29, §676; renumbered §12308 and amended Pub. L. 103–337, div. A, title XVI, §§1662(e)(2), 1675(c)(6), Oct. 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 2992, 3017.)

| Revised section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 676 | 10:1036a(e).34:440i(e). | June 29, 1948, ch. 708, §302(e), 62 Stat. 1088. |

34:440i(e).

The words "active duty, or in service, in a reserve component other than that listed in section 1332(b) of this title" are inserted to reflect the words "Federal service", as used in Title III of the source statute. The words "that service for all purposes" are substituted for 10:1036a(e) (last 11 words) and 34:440i(e) (last 11 words). The words "upon attaining the age of sixty years" are omitted as surplusage.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1994—Pub. L. 103–337, §1675(c)(6), substituted "1223" for "67" and "12732(b)" for "1332(b)".

Pub. L. 103–337, §1662(e)(2), renumbered section 676 of this title as this section.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1994 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 103–337 effective Dec. 1, 1994, except as otherwise provided, see section 1691 of Pub. L. 103–337, set out as an Effective Date note under section 10001 of this title.
BEFORE THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION
and the U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Application of

DELTA AIR LINES, INC.

for an allocation of U.S.-London Slots (Boston-Heathrow and Miami-Heathrow) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) European Commission CASE COMP/F-1/39.596 – AA/BA/IB

DOT-OST-2008-0252

MOTION FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT UNDER 14 C.F.R § 302.12

Communications with respect to this document should be addressed to:

Glen Hauenstein Executive Vice President – Network Planning & Revenue Management DELTA AIR LINES, INC.
1040 Delta Boulevard Atlanta, Georgia 30354

Robert J. Cortelyou Senior Vice President – Network Planning Jeff Lobl, Managing Director – International Network Planning DELTA AIR LINES, INC.
1030 Delta Boulevard Atlanta, Georgia 30320 Andrea Fischer Newman Senior Vice President – Government Affairs DELTA AIR LINES, INC. 1212 New York Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20005

Alexander Van der Bellen Managing Director – Government Affairs & Associate General Counsel Jeff Morgan Regional Director – Government Affairs DELTA AIR LINES, INC. 1212 New York Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20005 (202) 842-4184 sascha.vanderbellen@delta.com

October 14, 2010BEFORE THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION
and the U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Application of

DELTA AIR LINES, INC.

for an allocation of U.S.-London Slots (Boston-Heathrow and Miami-Heathrow) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) European Commission CASE COMP/F-1/39.596 – AA/BA/IB

DOT-OST-2008-0252

MOTION FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT UNDER 14 C.F.R § 302.12

Pursuant to 14 C.F.R. 302.12, Delta Air Lines, Inc. (“Delta”) hereby moves for

confidential treatment of the commercially sensit ive portions of its Business Plan, filed today

in support of its application for London Heathrow slots. This material contains confidential,

proprietary and commercially sensitive informati on that is protected from public disclosure

under longstanding DOT precedent. Rule 12 treatment for the applicant’s confidential

information was expressly contemplated under the procedures for this case to support the

exchange of information between the Depar tment and the Monitoring Trustee.

Respectfully submitted,

_________________________________ Alexander Van der Bellen Managing Director, Government Affairs & Associate General Counsel DELTA AIR LINES, INC.CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

A copy of the foregoing document has been served this 14 th day of October, 2010, upon the following persons via email:

BAAAIB.trustee@competitionrx.com matthew.gaved@competitionrx.com stephen.wainright@sdgworld.net linsey.mc-callum@ec.europa.eu todd.homan@dot.gov peter.irvine@dot.gov grady.stone@dot.gov esta.rosenberg@dot.gov byerlyjr@state.gov rob.hawks@faa.gov 7-AWA-Slotadmin@faa.gov john.allen@faa.gov anita.mosner@hklaw.com carl.nelson@aa.com jeff.ogar@aa.com paul.jasinski@ba.com libowd@sullcrom.com dhainbach@ggh-airlaw.com wkaras@steptoe.com sami.sarelius@finnair.fi mholland@condonlaw.com dan.weiss@coair.com hkamen@coair.com steve.morrissey@united.com jeffrey.manley@united.com howard.kass@usairways.com benjamin.slocum@usairways.com info@airlineinfo.com
### §2472. Prohibition on management of depot employees by end strength

The civilian employees of the Department of Defense, including the civilian employees of the military departments and the Defense Agencies, who perform, or are involved in the performance of, depot-level maintenance and repair workloads may not be managed on the basis of any constraint or limitation in terms of man years, end strength, full-time equivalent positions, or maximum number of employees. Such employees shall be managed solely on the basis of the available workload and the funds made available for such depot-level maintenance and repair.

(Added and amended Pub. L. 104–106, div. A, title III, §312(a), (b), Feb. 10, 1996, 110 Stat. 250; Pub. L. 105–85, div. A, title III, §360, Nov. 18, 1997, 111 Stat. 1700; Pub. L. 106–65, div. A, title X, §1067(1), Oct. 5, 1999, 113 Stat. 774; Pub. L. 108–375, div. A, title III, §322(a), (b)(1), Oct. 28, 2004, 118 Stat. 1846.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

The text of section 2466(b) of this title, which was transferred to this section and redesignated subsec. (a) by Pub. L. 104–106, §312(b), was based on Pub. L. 102–190, div. A, title III, §314(a)(1), Dec. 5, 1991, 105 Stat. 1336; Pub. L. 103–337, div. A, title III, §332(b), Oct. 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 2715.

#### Amendments

2004—Pub. L. 108–375 substituted "Prohibition on management of depot employees by end strength" for "Management of depot employees" in section catchline, struck out subsec. (a) designation and heading before "The civilian", and struck out heading and text of subsec. (b). Text read as follows: "Not later than December 1 of each fiscal year, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate and the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives a report on the number of employees employed and expected to be employed by the Department of Defense during that fiscal year to perform depot-level maintenance and repair of materiel. The report shall indicate whether that number is sufficient to perform the depot-level maintenance and repair functions for which funds are expected to be provided for that fiscal year for performance by Department of Defense employees."

1999—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 106–65 substituted "and the Committee on Armed Services" for "and the Committee on National Security".

1997—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 105–85 inserted first sentence and struck out former first sentence which read as follows: "The civilian employees of the Department of Defense involved in the depot-level maintenance and repair of materiel may not be managed on the basis of any end-strength constraint or limitation on the number of such employees who may be employed on the last day of a fiscal year."

1996—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 104–106, §312(b), renumbered section 2466(b) of this title as subsec. (a) of this section.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Submission of Initial Report

Pub. L. 104–106, div. A, title III, §312(c), Feb. 10, 1996, 110 Stat. 250, required the report under subsec. (b) of this section for fiscal year 1996 to be submitted not later than Mar. 15, 1996.
■
	



■
	







		



	


	







	





	
	
	
	
		

	
			
	





 !	

			

	"		

#	"	
	
	
	

	
			!




		$
 		" 	
	"
	

%	

	&

	

				
 


 		
&	
	


			!
			! 

	


	
#	
	

		!


	
	
!
  


	




 #	


		
  
	

	

'

	
			



"		 



	 	
 




(	

 			")


*		

 

 +	


	

  
	

%#

	
	
	

	
,
 
#&
	
 	


	


 


 				

 

	


 

			
&		
 
	




  


	




	



	#
	
	
	
  
	

	



#



		
"
 	& 				
	



			

		

	


&				




 





		


	
					
	

	


	
		
	
			-./		
		


01230.4		
		&#
Exhibit 32.1

                        GLOBAL EQUITY INTERNATIONAL, INC.
                              A Nevada Corporation
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report of Global Equity  International,  Inc.
("Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Peter
J. Smith, Chief Executive Officer,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Dated: March 30, 2012                      /s/ Peter J. Smith
                                           -------------------------------------
                                      By:  Peter J. Smith
                                      Its: Chief Executive Officer
## Summary of Energy Use Measurements for a Refr igerator-Freezer with two Defrost Cycle Types Data recorded in 2009 for Samsung Model RF26VABWP

Temperatures (F) Fresh Food 41.3 Freezer -4.2

Test Procedure Appendix A1 End Second Part of Test at End of Second Compressor "On" C y cle after Defrost Interim Final Rule (IFR) Appendix A Final Rule Appendix A EP1 (steady) (kWh) 0.3200 0.3200 0.3200 0.3200 EP2 (fresh food defrost) (kWh) 0.1533 0.2467 0.3267 0.4133 EP3 (combined defrost) (kWh) 0.3067 0.4067 0.4400 0.5667 T1 (minutes) 261.0 261.0 261.0 261.0 T2 (minutes) 139.8 180.1 269.5 317.7 T3 (minutes) 184.2 231.0 269.7 360.0

ET contributions Steady 1.766 1.766 1.766 1.766 Fresh Food Defrost -0.0115 0.0164 -0.0024 0.0152 Combined Defrost 0.0514 0.0784 0.0694 0.0796

Total 1.805 1.860 1.833 1.860

Percent Change compared with Appendix A1 3.0% 1.5% 3.0%

Percent Chan g e compared with IFR Appendix A 1.5%-10 0 10 20 30 40 501012141618202224262830Temperature (F), Power (W) x 0.1



### Hours Fresh Food Compartment Freezer Compartment
Power
ex_302752.htm


 


Exhibit 10.1


 


AMENDMENT NO. 3 TO


THE WRAP TECHNOLOGIES, INC.


2017 EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN


 


WHEREAS, the Board of Directors and stockholders of Wrap Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) have adopted the Amended Wrap Technologies, Inc. Amended 2017 Equity Compensation Plan (the “Plan”);


 


WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 4(a) of the Plan, a total of 6,000,000 shares of the common stock, par value $0.0001 per share, of the Company (the “Common Stock”) have been reserved for issuance under the Plan;


 


WHEREAS, the Company desires to increase the number of shares issuable under the Plan to 7,500,000 shares; and


 


WHEREAS, Sections 12(a) and 13(a) of the Plan permits the Company’s Board of Directors to amend the Plan from time to time to increase the number of shares of Common Stock authorized for issuance under the Plan.


 


NOW, THEREFORE, the following amendments and modifications are hereby made a part of the Plan:


 


1.   Section 4(a) of the Plan shall be, and hereby is, amended to increase the aggregate number of shares of Common Stock issuable thereunder to 7,500,000, and such section is thereby to read as follows:


 


“4.    Shares Subject To The Plan.


 


(a)  Share Reserve.  Subject to the provisions of Section 12 relating to adjustments upon changes in Common Stock, the total number of shares of Common Stock that may be issued pursuant to Stock Awards shall not exceed in the aggregate of 7,500,000 shares (the “Reserved Shares”).”


 


2.   In all other respects, the Plan, as amended, is hereby ratified and confirmed and shall remain in full force and effect.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has executed this Amendment No. 3 to the Wrap Technologies, Inc. Equity Compensation Plan as of June 22, 2021.


 


	 	
			WRAP TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

			
	 	 
	 	
			By: /s/ James Barnes 


			Name:  James Barnes


			Title: Chief Financial Officer
# C_2013382EN.01000901.xml

| 31.12.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 382/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.12.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 382/9

---

Notice concerning a request pursuant to Article 30 of Directive 2004/17/EC

Request from a contracting entity

2013/C 382/08

On 21 November 2013, the Commission received a request under Article 30(5) of Directive 2004/17/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 coordinating the procurement procedures of entities operating in the water, energy, transport and postal services sectors (1). The first working day following receipt of the request is 22 November 2013.

1

This request, made by Magyar Posta Zrt., concerns certain postal services carried out in Hungary. Article 30 provides that the Directive does not apply where the activity in question is directly exposed to competition on markets to which access is not limited. These conditions are evaluated solely for the purposes of Directive 2004/17/EC and are without prejudice to the application of competition rules.

The Commission has a period of 3 months, as from the working day referred to above, within which to take a decision on this request. The period therefore ends on 24 February 2014.

This period may be extended by 3 months. Notice of any such extension must be published.

Pursuant to the second subparagraph of Article 30(6), further requests concerning the same activities in Hungary, submitted before the period opened for this request expires, will not be regarded as subject to new procedures and will be dealt with as part of this request.

---

(1)  OJ L 134, 30.4.2004, p. 1.

1

---
154 So.2d 302

#### David Dallas TAYLOR v. STATE of Alabama.

3 Div. 69.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

May 30, 1963.

David Dallas Taylor, pro se.

Richmond M. Flowers, Atty. Gen., and John G. Bookout, Asst. Atty. Gen., opposed.

MERRILL, Justice.

Petitioner filed a petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals. The Attorney General filed a motion to dismiss the petition on the ground that no application for rehearing was made in the Court of Appeals. The motion to dismiss must be granted. Richardson v. State, 215 Ala. 581, 112 So. 193; Supreme Court Rule 39.

Petition dismissed.

LIVINGSTON, C. J., and SIMPSON and HARWOOD, JJ., concur.
### §1215. Members other than Regulars: applicability of laws

The laws and regulations that entitle any retired member of a regular component of the armed forces to pay, rights, benefits, or privileges extend the same pay, rights, benefits, or privileges to any other member of the armed forces who is not a member of a regular component and who is retired, or to whom retired pay is granted, because of physical disability.

(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 100.)

| Revised section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1215 | 37:272(i). | Oct. 12, 1949, ch. 681, §402(i), 63 Stat. 820. |

The words "is retired, or to whom retired pay is granted" are substituted for the words "heretofore or hereafter retired or granted retirement pay". The words "any other member of the armed forces" are substituted for the words "all members of the reserve components", since the words "reserve components" are defined by section 102(k) of the Career Compensation Act of 1949, 63 Stat. 805 (37 U.S.C. 231(k)), to include members appointed, enlisted, or inducted without component.