alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document

Exhibit 10.1


—————————————————————
RATE APPLICABLE TO PARTICIPATING
DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
UNDER THE DIRECTOR AND EXECUTIVES
DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN
—————————————————————
(As in effect for 2022)


Effective for the 2022 plan year, the Board of Directors and its Compensation Committee approved an applicable interest rate of 9.07% for the Directors and Executives Deferred Compensation Plan. That rate increased from the 8.20% rate in effect for 2021, and applies prospectively to certain participants, including all participants who presently are directors or officers of First Horizon Corporation. Rates are subject to annual approval by the Board, but generally remain in effect until changed. The new interest rate, within the context of the entire Plan, has been established at a level intended to provide both retention and long-term non-compete incentives. When a participant retires after 2010 due to mandatory retirement, the participant’s interest rate during retirement will be the highest rate in place over the past three years—that is, the highest of the rates applicable during the year of retirement and the previous two years.


									
	FIRST HORIZON CORPORATION	1
	3Q21 FORM 10-Q, EXHIBIT 10.1
D&E PLAN RATE FOR 2022
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 98 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 H. R. 98

  To amend chapter 443 of title 49, United States Code, to extend the 
                  aviation war risk insurance program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 6, 1999

 Mr. Shuster (for himself, Mr. Oberstar, Mr. Duncan, and Mr. Lipinski) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                   Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend chapter 443 of title 49, United States Code, to extend the 
                  aviation war risk insurance program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF INSURANCE PROGRAM.

    Section 44310 of title 49, United States Code, is amended by 
striking ``March 31, 1999'' and inserting ``December 31, 2003''.
                                 <all>
```
§ 162.244 How will BIA decide whether to approve a leasehold mortgage under an agricultural lease? ( a ) We will approve a leasehold mortgage under an agricultural lease if: ( 1 ) The required consents have been obtained from the parties to the lease under § 162.230 and the tenant's sureties;
( 2 ) The mortgage covers only the tenant's interest in the leased premises, and no unrelated collateral;
( 3 ) The loan being secured by the mortgage will be used only in connection with the development or use of the leased premises, and the mortgage does not secure any unrelated debts owed by the tenant to the mortgagee; and
( 4 ) We find no compelling reason to withhold our approval in order to protect the best interests of the Indian landowners.
( b ) In making the finding required by paragraph (a)(4) of this section, we will consider whether: ( 1 ) The tenant's ability to comply with the lease would be adversely affected by any new loan obligations;
( 2 ) Any lease provisions would be modified by the mortgage;
( 3 ) The remedies available to us or to the Indian landowners would be limited (beyond any additional notice and cure rights to be afforded to the mortgagee), in the event of a lease violation; and
( 4 ) Any rights of the Indian landowners would be subordinated or adversely affected in the event of a loan default by the tenant.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<LEGEND> The following schedule contains summary financial information
which has been extracted from the financial statements of
Australian-Canadian Oil Royalties LTD.s for the quarterly financial
statements filed on Form 10QSB for the period presented.  These summary
schedules are qualified in their entirety by reference to such financial
statements and the notes thereto.
</LEGEND>

<CIK> 0001061288
<NAME> AUSTRALIAN-CANADIAN OIL ROYALTIES


<S>                           <C>                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 3-MOS              6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             DEC-31-2000        DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                JAN-01-2000        JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                  JUN-30-2000        JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                            216,158            216,158
<SECURITIES>                            0                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                       1,458              1,458
<ALLOWANCES>                            0                  0
<INVENTORY>                             0                  0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                  219,270            219,270
<PP&E>                            308,966            308,966
<DEPRECIATION>                   (13,427)           (13,427)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                    519,947            519,947
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                 166                166
<BONDS>                                 0                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                   0                  0
<PREFERRED>                             0                  0
<COMMON>                          613,548            613,548
<OTHER-SE>                       (93,767)           (93,767)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>      519,781            519,781
<SALES>                             3,548              5,567
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                    3,548              5,567
<CGS>                               1,561              3,001
<TOTAL-COSTS>                       1,987              2,566
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                   27,216             41,270
<LOSS-PROVISION>                        0                  0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                      0                  0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                  (22,117)           (32,693)
<INCOME-TAX>                        1,065              1,670
<INCOME-CONTINUING>              (23,182)           (34,363)
<DISCONTINUED>                          0                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                         0                  0
<CHANGES>                               0                  0
<NET-INCOME>                     (23,182)           (34,363)
<EPS-BASIC>                        (0.00)             (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                      (0.00)             (0.01)
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 307 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                       October 5, 1999.
    Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in order to 
consider the conference report to accompany the bill (H.R. 2606) making 
appropriations for foreign operations, export financing, and related programs 
for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2000, and for other purposes. All 
points of order against the conference report and against its consideration are 
waived. The conference report shall be considered as read.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Livestock grazing planamendment - EIS**
 
Newsletters: One | Two | Three | Four | Five
 
SuDoc Number:I 53.59:G 76/2/
Item Number:0629-E-09 (online)
CGP systemNumber:001038396
 
December 18, 2017
### §1074n. Annual mental health assessments for members of the armed forces

(a) Mental Health Assessments.—Subject to subsection (c), not less frequently than once each calendar year (and before separation from active duty pursuant to section 1145(a)(5)(A) of this title), the Secretary of Defense shall provide a person-to-person mental health assessment for—

(1) each member of a regular component of the armed forces; and

(2) each member of the Selected Reserve of an armed force.

(b) Elements.—The mental health assessments provided pursuant to this section shall—

(1) be conducted in accordance with the requirements of subsection (c)(1) of section 1074m of this title with respect to a mental health assessment provided pursuant to such section; and

(2) include a review of the health records of the member that are related to each previous health assessment or other relevant activities of the member while serving in the armed forces, as determined by the Secretary.

(c) Sufficiency of Other Mental Health Assessments.—(1) The Secretary is not required to provide a mental health assessment pursuant to this section to an individual in a calendar year in which the individual has received a mental health assessment pursuant to section 1074m of this title.

(2) The Secretary may treat periodic health assessments and other person-to-person assessments that are provided to members of the armed forces, including examinations under section 1074f of this title, as meeting the requirements for mental health assessments required under this section if the Secretary determines that such assessments and person-to-person assessments meet the requirements for mental health assessments established by this section.

(d) Privacy Matters.—Any medical or other personal information obtained under this section shall be protected from disclosure or misuse in accordance with the laws on privacy applicable to such information.

(e) Regulations.—The Secretary of Defense shall, in consultation with the other administering Secretaries, prescribe regulations for the administration of this section.

(Added Pub. L. 113–291, div. A, title VII, §701(a)(1), Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3408; amended Pub. L. 115–91, div. A, title VII, §706(b), Dec. 12, 2017, 131 Stat. 1436.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2017—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 115–91 inserted "(and before separation from active duty pursuant to section 1145(a)(5)(A) of this title)" after "each calendar year" in introductory provisions.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Implementation of Regulations

Pub. L. 113–291, div. A, title VII, §701(a)(3), Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3409, provided that: "Not later than 180 days after the date of the issuance of the regulations prescribed under section 1074n(e) of title 10, United States Code, as added by paragraph (1), the Secretary of Defense shall implement such regulations."
# **Exhibit 32.1**

# ** **

**Certificate pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to**

**Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of GB&T Bancshares, Inc.(the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2006, asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, Richard A. Hunt, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, to thebest of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.                                       TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.                                       Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ Richard A.  Hunt                      |   |
|-------------------------------------------|--------|
| Richard A. Hunt,  Chief Executive Officer |
|                                      |
|                                      |
| May 10,  2006                        |

 

----
No. 198.

#### The State of Louisiana vs. W. H. Bassenger.

A motion for a continuance, based on an *ajidaint*which is insufficient, cannot be allowed.

A motion to ■ compel the State to elect between two counts, which does not set forth the grounds upon which it rests, cannot be granted. The overruling of it cannot be reviewed on appeal, when the bill taken to the refusal of the court to order the election, does not set forth either those grounds or those on which the action of the trial judge was predicated. |¶1

APPEAL from the Criminal District Court for the Parish of Orleans. *JBalcer,*J.

*M. J. Ounningham,*Attorney General, for the State, Appellee.

*J. J. Foley*for Defendant and Appellant.

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Bermudez, C. J.

The defendant was prosecuted on two counts: 1st, stabbing with a dangerous weapon with intent to kill and murder j and 2d, inflicting with a dangerous weapon a wound less than mayhem.

Prom a conviction on the first count and a sentence of five years at hard labor, he appeals.

The record shows two grounds of complaint to the refusal of the trial judge: 1st, to continue the case; and 2d, to compel the State to elect.

The first bill of exception taken to the overruling of the motion to continue, owing to the absence of a witness, does not rest on solid foundation.

As reasons in support of his refusal the district judge says : *that*the accused knew of the fixing of his case for some time and though represented by counsel he has not had him summoned; *that,*not the least diligence has been used to procure the attendance of the *witness; that*
      *919neither the materiality of the evidence to be given, nor what the evidence. is, appears in the *affidavit;*that, although the affidavit be fatally defective, still, if any statement by counsel made it probable that this witness would be procured and that his testimony was material, he would have granted the continuance.

Further examination of the bill shows that the accused does not swear that, notwithstanding due diligence, he has failed to ascertain and does not know the place of residence of the witness. He might have known it well.

Under the circumstances, there being nothing to impugn the reasons assigned by the district judge which we find sustained by the record, we cannot say that he did not rule correctly.

The second bill is to the refusal of the trial judge to require the State to elect between the two counts.

The bill does not show on what grounds the motion to elect rests, or those on which it was refused.

The bill is informal and does not furnish *data*sufficient to authorize or justify an inquiry into the correctness of the ruling on the motion.

The rule for a new trial is based on four grounds:

It refers to the two refusals just considered, to the illegal admission of certain evidence to which no bill was taken and to the averment that the evidence did not warrant the verdict, a reason with which we are not concerned.

Judgment affirmed.
### §1761. Management information system

(a) In General.—The Secretary of Defense shall prescribe regulations to ensure that the military departments and Defense Agencies establish a management information system capable of providing standardized information to the Secretary on persons serving in acquisition positions.

(b) Minimum Information.—The management information system shall, at a minimum, provide for the following:

(1) The collection and retention of information concerning the qualifications, assignments, and tenure of persons in the acquisition workforce.

(2) Any exceptions and waivers granted with respect to the application of qualification, assignment, and tenure policies, procedures, and practices to such persons.

(3) Relative promotion rates for military personnel in the acquisition workforce.

(Added Pub. L. 101–510, div. A, title XII, §1202(a), Nov. 5, 1990, 104 Stat. 1653; amended Pub. L. 103–160, div. A, title IX, §904(d)(1), Nov. 30, 1993, 107 Stat. 1728; Pub. L. 107–107, div. A, title X, §1048(b)(2), Dec. 28, 2001, 115 Stat. 1225; Pub. L. 108–375, div. A, title X, §1084(d)(15), Oct. 28, 2004, 118 Stat. 2062.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2004—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 108–375 substituted "provide for the following:" for "provide for—" in introductory provisions, capitalized first letter of first word in pars. (1) to (3), substituted period for semicolon at end in pars. (1) and (2), substituted period for "; and" at end in par. (3), and struck out par. (4) which read as follows: "collection of the information necessary for the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics and the Secretary of Defense to comply with the requirements of section 1762 for the years in which that section is in effect."

2001—Subsec. (b)(4). Pub. L. 107–107 substituted "Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics" for "Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Technology".

1993—Subsec. (b)(4). Pub. L. 103–160 substituted "Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Technology" for "Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Establishment of Management Information System

Pub. L. 101–510, div. A, title XII, §1209(k), Nov. 5, 1990, 104 Stat. 1667, required the Secretary of Defense to prescribe in regulations the requirements under this section for the uniform management information system by Oct. 1, 1991, and ensure that the requirements were implemented by Oct. 1, 1992.
#### § 1000.407 Do the wage and labor standards in the Davis-Bacon Act apply to Tribes and Tribal Consortia?

No, wage and labor standards of the Davis-Bacon Act do not apply to employees of Tribes and Tribal Consortia. They do apply to all other laborers and mechanics employed by contractors and subcontractors in the construction, alteration, and repair (including painting or redecorating of buildings or other facilities) in connection with an AFA.
#### § 166.306 Can the BIA adjust the grazing capacity?

Yes. In consultation with the Indian landowners or in the BIA's discretion based on good cause, we may adjust the grazing capacity using the best evaluation method(s) relevant to the ecological region.
§ 166.907 Who can be an intern? ( a ) Natural resources or agriculture personnel working for an approved organization may apply for an internship within agriculture-related programs of agencies of the Department of the Interior or other federal agencies providing an agriculture service to their respective reservations.
( b ) Natural resources or agriculture-related personnel from other Department of the Interior agencies may apply through proper channels for “internships” within the BIA's agriculture programs. With the consent of a tribe or Alaska Native organization, the BIA can arrange for an Intergovernmental Personnel Act assignment in tribal or Alaska Native agriculture programs.
( c ) Natural resources and agriculture personnel from agencies not within the Department of the Interior may apply, through proper agency channels and pursuant to an interagency agreement, for an “internship” within the BIA and, with the consent of a tribe or Alaska Native organization, we can facilitate an Intergovernmental Personnel Act assignment in a tribe, tribal agriculture enterprise, or Alaska Native Corporation.
( d ) Natural resources or agriculture personnel from a tribe, tribal agriculture enterprise, or Alaska Native Corporation may apply, through proper channels and pursuant to a cooperative agreement, for an internship within another tribe, tribal forest enterprise, or ANCSA Corporation agriculture program.
( e ) The employing agency of participating federal employees will provide for the continuation of salary and benefits.
( f ) The host agency for participating tribal, tribal agriculture enterprise, or Alaska Native Corporation agriculture employees will provide for salaries and benefits.
( g ) A bonus pay incentive, up to 25 percent (%) of the intern's base salary, may be provided to intergovernmental interns at the conclusion of the internship period. Bonus pay incentives will be at the discretion of and funded by the host organization and must be conditioned upon the host agency's documentation of the intern's superior performance, in accordance with the agency's performance standards, during the internship period.
#### § 162.218 Is there a standard agricultural lease form?

Based on the need for flexibility in advertising, negotiating and drafting of appropriate lease terms and conditions, there is no standard agricultural lease form that must be used. We will assist the Indian landowners in drafting lease provisions that conform to the requirements of this part.
!

		
  
	 		

	 
		
	"#$	"%$$	
&

	 '
	(		)	


	
			 	'
	



 
*

&
			
		 

	&	
	
		

	  





+		 
,




 
	&-.+			
,

&
	
 	
 	
'


*/	 	
	"%%#			"%$$	 	%0

	
		 
	 
'&


	


 


	
	 
"%%#

	

	 		
	'
	
	
		
'


		
	
"%#


12%
&-.	 			





	 	"3$			"%$$

	
  
 


			
	
				
	


4 5
	 

	 		*					

&-.	
	
		  
	
		
	



	


		 	
		
		
&
	
	

	
 

	 		 	 

	 

		 &	
		 
	
6	
 
	


	
 

	
	
	

	



■ 
	



■ 
	







“ I just need enough cash

to tide me over until

payday.”
4 	&-.


+
 	



		

	,					

4 &	 					 !
	 	



	


	


4 7 

 	 	

'
 &	 

 


	 &	
 	

	


				
	

 
''
		!	'


 
	 
		 	
"1$$	




	 
	'	

	 	 '	
	  







4 !
	 	 
	

			
	
	 
	 
	  

 
			 

	 	 

	 
	 
+	


,	 
		
			

		 	 

	!
	 				


4 	 
	
	 

			
 
	


	 		
 	 


	
		 
	

 
		
 	
		&	
	 

	
 
	
		 
 		
					 

	

4 	 	   	

			
 	 
			 


'

	 		
'

  

	 
	 
*

&
	 
	


!!			
 	
  


 
 




		
		
		
 	
	
		

	
		
		
	
	
  
	
%899!:;*-+%89918<

01#9,
	 	
		!









	 	

		
 =


 
	

	


	


	


=
#### Nicholas Tartaglione, Appellant, v Joseph Pugliese et al., Respondents.

[824 NYS2d 132]

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for false arrest and malicious prosecution, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Jamieson, J), entered April 26, 2005, as granted the motion of the defendants Joseph Fugliese, Ronald Trainham, the Village of Briarcliff Manor Folice Department, and the Village of Briarcliff Manor, and the separate motion of the defendant Lawrence Adamitis, pursuant to CFLR 3211 to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against them.

*447Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with one bill of costs payable to the respondents appearing separately and filing separate briefs.

In a prior federal action pursuant to 42 USC § 1983, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York found that there was probable cause to support the plaintiff’s arrest and prosecution for perjury and official misconduct. The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirmed. Contrary to the plaintiff’s contention, the probable cause issue was necessarily decided in the prior action dismissing the plaintiffs § 1983 claim, and that issue is decisive in disposing of the plaintiffs first three causes of action *(see Broughton v State of New York,*37 NY2d 451, 457 [1975], *cert denied sub nom. Schanbarger v Kellogg,*423 US 929 [1975]; *Gisondi v Town of Harrison,*72 NY2d 280, 283-284 [1988]; *Iorio v City of New York,*19 AD3d 452 [2005]; *Curiano v Suozzi,*63 NY2d 113, 116 [1984]). Having had a full and fair opportunity to litigate the issue in the federal courts, the plaintiff is precluded from relitigating it in this forum *(see Matter of Juan C. v Cortines,*89 NY2d 659, 667 [1997]; *Kaufman v Eli Lilly & Co.,*65 NY2d 449, 455 [1985]). Therefore, the Supreme Court properly dismissed the plaintiffs first three causes of action on collateral estoppel grounds *(see*CPLR 3211 [a] [5]).

The Supreme Court also properly dismissed the plaintiffs fourth cause of action, as it failed to state a cause of action *(see*CPLR 3211 [a] [7]; Labor Law § 740 [2] [a]; Civil Service Law § 75-b [2] [a]). Ritter, J.P., Goldstein, Rivera and Spolzino, JJ., concur.