alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
H. Res. 137

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

April 14, 1999.

Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall

be in order to consider a conference report to accompany the

concurrent resolution (H. Con. Res. 68) establishing the congressional budget for the United States Government for fiscal

year 2000 and setting forth appropriate budgetary levels for

each of the fiscal years 2001 through 2009. All points of

order against the conference report and against its consideration are waived. The conference report shall be considered

as read. The conference report shall be debatable for one

hour equally divided and controlled by chairman and ranking

minority member of the Committee on the Budget.

Attest:

Clerk.
§ 1000.213 What should the bureau do if it is invited to attend a meeting with respect to the Tribe's/Consortium's proposed AFA? If the bureau is invited to participate in meetings, hearings, etc., held or conducted by other parties, where the subject matter of the AFA under negotiation is expected to be raised, the bureau: ( a ) Shall notify the Tribe/Consortium at the earliest practical time; and
( b ) Should encourage the meeting sponsor to invite the Tribe/Consortium to participate.
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 142 (Tuesday, July 24, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 43275]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-18046]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION

Notice of Sunshine Act Meetings

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

TIME AND DATE: 10 a.m., Friday August 17, 2012.

PLACE: 1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission 
Conference Room.

STATUS: Closed.

Matters To Be Considered

    Surveillance and Enforcement Matters. In the event that the times 
or dates of these or any future meetings change, an announcement of the 
change, along with the new time and place of the meeting will be posted 
on the Commission's Web site at http://www.cftc.gov.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Sauntia S. Warfield, 202-418-5084.

Sauntia Warfield,
Assistant Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2012-18046 Filed 7-20-12; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-P
```
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News

Philippines and U.S. Conclude Balikatan Exercises, Shoulder-To-ShoulderMay 10, 2024 — The Armed Forces of the Philippines hosted the closing ceremony of Exercise Balikatan 2024, marking the successful conclusion of the largest annual combined military exercise between the Republic of the Philippines and the United States of America... MORE 

----

2024 (327)2023 (825)2022 (1193)2021 (1066)2020 (1083)2019 (1166)2018 (1116)2017 (1356)2016 (1475)2015 (1408)2014 (904)2013 (32)2012 (4)

About DoDDoD CareersJoin the MilitaryNewsUSA.govPhotos & VideosPrivacy & SecurityTop Issues

US INDOPACOM Inspector GeneralDoD Inspector General Accessibility/Section 508DoD FOIAUS INDOPACOM FOIALink DisclaimerNo FEAR ActRecovery ActINDOPACOM Webmaster

                  - Facebook
                  - X
                  - YouTube
                  - Instagram
                  - RSS

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
356 August 14, 2024 No. 564

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE 

STATE OF OREGON

STATE OF OREGON,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

TAYLOR BRYANT BRIGHT,

Defendant-Respondent.

Curry County Circuit Court

21CR16034; A179954

Cynthia Lynnae Beaman, Judge.

On respondent’s petition for reconsideration filed June 14, 

2024. Opinion filed June 5, 2024. 333 Or App 58 (2024).

Ernest G. Lannet, Chief Defender, Criminal Appellate 

Section, and Matthew Blythe, Deputy Public Defender, 

Oregon Public Defense Commission for petition.

Before Aoyagi, Presiding Judge, Joyce, Judge, and 

Jacquot, Judge.

JOYCE, J.

Reconsideration allowed; opinion modified and adhered 

to as modified.
Cite as 334 Or App 356 (2024) 357

JOYCE, J.

Defendant petitions for reconsideration of our opinion in State v. Bright, 333 Or App 58, ___ P3d ___ (2024). We 

allow reconsideration, modify our prior opinion as described 

below, and adhere to the opinion as modified.

In his petition, defendant asks us to clarify the 

scope of the trial court’s authority on remand. The state has 

not filed a response to the petition.

We grant reconsideration to clarify the scope of the 

court’s authority on remand. We add the following sentence 

to the end of the last paragraph of our original opinion, 333 

Or App at 62: “We therefore reverse and remand for further 

proceedings consistent with this opinion, including factfinding under the correct legal standard.”

Reconsideration allowed; opinion modified and 

adhered to as modified.
**Exhibit13.2**

  

CERTIFICATIONOF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER UNDER SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEYACT

 

Pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Can-fiteBioPharmaLtd. (the “Company”) hereby certifies to such officer’s knowledge that:

 

(i)    	theaccompanying Annual Report on Form 20-F of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2014 (the “Report”) fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(ii)   	theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operationsof the Company.

 

Dated:March 27, 2015

 

MottiFarbstein

ChiefOperating and Financial Officer

 

Theforegoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and is not beingfiled for the purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by referenceto any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language insuch filing.
§ 11.314 Jury trials. ( a ) A defendant has a right, upon demand, to a jury trial in any criminal case: ( 1 ) That is punishable by a maximum sentence of one year incarceration; or
( 2 ) In which the prosecutor informs the court before the case comes to trial that a jail sentence will be sought.
( b ) If the prosecutor informs the court that no sentence of incarceration will be sought, the court may not impose a sentence of incarceration for the offense.
( c ) A jury must consist of not less than six residents of the vicinity in which trial is held, selected from a list of eligible jurors prepared each year by the court. ( 1 ) An eligible juror must: ( i ) Be at least 18 years of age;
( ii ) Not have been convicted of a felony; and
( iii ) Be otherwise qualified according to standards established by the Court of Indian Offenses under its general rulemaking authority.
( 2 ) Any party may challenge without cause a maximum of three members of the jury panel chosen under this section.
( d ) The magistrate shall instruct the jury with regard to the applicable law and the jury shall decide all questions of fact on the basis of the law.
( e ) The jury shall deliberate in secret and return a verdict of guilty or not guilty. Six out of the eight jurors must concur to render a verdict.
( f ) Each juror who serves on a jury is entitled to a fee not less than the hourly minimum wage scale established by 29 U.S.C. 206(a)(1), and any of its subsequent revisions, plus mileage not to exceed the maximum rate per mile established by the Federal Government of jurors and witnesses. Each juror shall receive pay for a full day (eight hours) for any portion of a day served, plus travel allowance.
[58 FR 54411, Oct. 21, 1993, as amended at 73 FR 39861, July 11, 2008]
### §14312. Delay of promotion: voluntary

(a) Authority for Voluntary Delays.—(1) The Secretary of the military department concerned may, by regulation, permit delays of a promotion of an officer who is recommended for promotion by a mandatory selection board convened under section 14101(a) or a special selection board convened under section 14502 of this title at the request of the officer concerned. Such delays, in the case of any promotion, may extend for any period not to exceed three years from the date on which the officer would otherwise be promoted.

(2) Regulations under this section shall provide that—

(A) a request for such a delay of promotion must be submitted by the officer concerned before the delay may be approved; and

(B) denial of such a request shall not be considered to be a failure of selection for promotion unless the officer declines to accept a promotion under circumstances set forth in subsection (c).

(b) Effect of Approval of Request.—If a request for delay of a promotion under subsection (a) is approved, the officer's name shall remain on the promotion list during the authorized period of delay (unless removed under any other provision of law). Upon the end of the period of the authorized delay, or at any time during such period, the officer may accept the promotion, which shall be effective on the date of acceptance. Such an acceptance of a promotion shall be made in accordance with regulations prescribed under this section.

(c) Effect of Declining a Promotion.—An officer's name shall be removed from the promotion list and, if the officer is serving in a grade below colonel or, in the case of the Navy, captain, the officer shall be considered to have failed of selection for promotion if any of the following applies:

(1) The Secretary concerned has not authorized voluntary delays of promotion under subsection (a) to the grade concerned and the officer declines to accept an appointment to a higher grade.

(2) The Secretary concerned has authorized voluntary delays of promotion under subsection (a), but has denied the request of the officer for a delay of promotion and the officer then declines to accept an appointment to a higher grade.

(3) The Secretary concerned has approved the request of an officer for a delay of promotion and, upon the end of the period of delay authorized in accordance with regulations prescribed under subsection (a), the officer then declines to accept an appointment to a higher grade.

(Added Pub. L. 103–337, div. A, title XVI, §1611, Oct. 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 2941.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Oct. 1, 1996, see section 1691(b)(1) of Pub. L. 103–337, set out as a note under section 10001 of this title.
Exhibit 99.2

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 908 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Hometown Auto Retailers, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q/A for the period ending March 31, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Charles
F. Schwartz, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


/s/ Charles F. Schwartz
-------------------------
Chief Financial Officer
September 13, 2002
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 254 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                     November 18, 1999.
Whereas diversity and tolerance are essential principles of an open and free 
        society;
Whereas all people deserve to be safe within their communities, free to live, 
        work and worship without fear of violence and bigotry;
Whereas crimes motivated by hatred against African-Americans, Jews, Asian-
        Americans, or other groups undermine the fundamental values of our 
        Nation;
Whereas the communities of Skokie, the West Rogers Park neighborhood of Chicago, 
        Northbrook, and Urbana, Illinois, and Bloomington, Indiana, were 
        terrorized by hate crimes over the Fourth of July weekend, a time when 
        our Nation celebrates its commitment to freedom and liberty;
Whereas hate crimes tear at the fabric of American society, leave scars on 
        victims and their families, and weaken our sense of community and 
        purpose;
Whereas Ricky Byrdsong, at age 43, was a loving husband and father, an inspiring 
        community leader, and a former basketball coach at Northwestern 
        University;
Whereas Ricky Byrdsong was a man of deep religious faith who touched the lives 
        of countless people and whose death is mourned by his family, friends, 
        and community, and by the Nation;
Whereas Won-Joon Yoon, at age 26, was the only son in a family of 6, and was 
        soon to become a doctoral student in Economics at Indiana University;
Whereas Won-Joon Yoon was a man who, through his demeanor and firmly-held 
        Christian beliefs, positively influenced those who knew him, and whose 
        death is mourned by his family, friends, and community, and by the 
        citizens of the United States and Korea; and
Whereas individuals who commit crimes based on hate and bigotry must be held 
        responsible for their actions and must be stopped from spreading 
        violence: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) condemns the senseless violence that occurred in Illinois and 
        Indiana over the Fourth of July weekend;
            (2) conveys its deepest sympathy to the victims and their families;
            (3) condemns the culture of hate and the hate groups that foster 
        such violent acts;
            (4) commends the communities of Illinois and Indiana for uniting to 
        condemn these acts of hate in their neighborhoods;
            (5) commends the efforts of Federal, State, and local law 
        enforcement officials; and
            (6) reaffirms its commitment to a society that fully respects and 
        protects all people, regardless of race, religion, or ethnicity.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
Transamerica Occidental Life Insurance Company
1150 South Olive Street
Los Angeles, CA  90015




March 11, 2006



Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20549

Re:  Transamerica  Occidental Life Insurance Company and Transamerica Occidental
     Life Separate Account VL (File No. 33-2022)

Dear Commissioner:

On behalf of Transamerica Occidental Life Insurance Company and Transamerica
Occidental Life Separate Account VL ("separate account"), incorporated by
reference is the annual report for the underlying fund, the EQ Advisers Trust,
for filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission, pursuant to Rule 30b2-1
under the Investment Company Act of 1940 ("Act").

         Filer/Entity:              EQ Advisers Trust
         File #:                    811-07953
         CIK #:                     0001027263
         Accession #:               0001193125-06-050439
         Date of Filing:            03-10-06

This annual report is for the period ending December 31, 2005, and has been
transmitted to contract holders in accordance with Rule 30d-2 under the Act.


Very truly yours,



David M. Goldstein
Senior Vice President
Exhibit 3.3

                            CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
                                       TO
                          CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
                                       OF
                               LEGEND MOBILE, INC.


         LEGEND MOBILE, INC., a corporation  organized and existing under and by
virtue of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware, hereby certifies
as follows:

         FIRST:  That the  Certificate of  Incorporation  of the  Corporation is
hereby  amended by  striking  out the first  sentence  of Article 5 thereof  and
substituting in lieu of said sentence the following new sentence:

         "The aggregate  number of shares that the Corporation has the authority
         to issue is seventy-five  million  (75,000,000) shares of Common Stock,
         each  having  a  par  value  of  $0.001  per  share,  and  two  million
         (2,000,000) shares of Preferred Stock, each having a par value of $0.01
         per share."

         All other aspects of Article 5 remain unchanged.

         SECOND:  That the  foregoing  amendment  was duly adopted in accordance
with  the  provisions  of 242 of the  General  Corporation  Law of the  State of
Delaware.

         LEGEND MOBILE,  INC. has caused this  certificate to be signed by Peter
Klamka, its Chief Executive Officer, on May 31, 2005.


                                                  LEGEND MOBILE, INC.

                                                  By:  /s/ Peter Klamka
                                                       -----------------------
                                                       Peter Klamka
                                                       Chief Executive Officer
#### Peter Koeler *v.*Samuel E. Eaton.

The decree in this case is reversed for want of any evidence to support it.

Writ of Error to the Circuit Court of Woodford county; the Hon. Samuel L. Richmond, Judge, presiding.

Messrs. Bangs & Shaw and Mr. L. Newell, for the plaintiff in error.

Mr. John Clark, for the defendant in error.

Mr. Justice Lawrence

delivered the opinion of the Court:

This was a bill in chancery, brought by Eaton against Koeler, to compel the conveyance of a tract of land. The hill alleges that the complainant had entered the land at the government land office, and that the defendant afterwards bribed a clerk in the office to erase complainant’s entry, and substitute an entry by defendant. The ■ defendant answered, *320denying the allegations of the bill; a replication was filed, and the deposition taken, of the register’s clerk charged to have received the bribe. Nothing of the kind, however, was proven by him and no other testimony was taken. The case seems to have stood on the docket for some years without action, but a decree was finally pronounced in favor of the complainant, directing the defendant to convey. As there was no evidence, whatever, upon which to base such a decree,, we presume the case was heard *ex*parte, and the decree rendered under misapprehension of the facts. It must be reversed and the cause remanded.

*Decree reversed.*
## Subpart I—Defense Industrial Base

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, §801(a), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1831, added subpart heading.
### SUBCHAPTER II—DEFENSE INTELLIGENCE AGENCY PERSONNEL

Sec.
1621.
Defense Intelligence Agency merit pay system.
1622.
Uniform allowance: civilian employees.
1623.
Financial assistance to certain employees in acquisition of critical skills.
#### § 150.203 Who may submit a title document for recording?

Only an Agency, Region, or OHA may submit title documents to the LTRO for recording. All other government offices and individuals must submit title documents to the Agency, Region, or OHA, as appropriate, for that Agency, Region, or OHA to submit to the LTRO.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

# Army Prepositioned Stock-4 Partners U.S. Army Pacific for PULSE-W Exercise 

By Maj. Bruce HodgesAFSBn-NEA (APS-4)

                YOKOHAMA NORTH DOCK, Japan  –              

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

PULSE-W Exercise

news

articles

pacom
§ 122.2 Definitions. *Act* means Osage Tribe by Act of Congress, October 27, 1972 (25 U.S.C. 883, 86 Stat. 1295), as amended by Pub. L. 98-605.
*Allottee* means a person whose name appears on the roll of Osage Tribe of Indians approved by the Secretary of the Interior on April 11, 1908, pursuant to the Act of June 28, 1906 (34 Stat. 539).
*Assistant Secretary* means the Assistant Secretary—Indian Affairs.
*Osage Tribal Education Committee* means the committee selected to administer the provisions of this part as specified by § 122.6.
*Reverted funds* means the unpaid portions of the per capita distribution fund, as provided by the Act, which were not distributed because the funds were: ( 1 ) Unclaimed within the period specified by the Act; or
( 2 ) For an amount totaling less than $20 due an individual from one or more shares of one or more Osage allottees.
*Secretary* means the Secretary of the Department of the Interior or his/her authorized representative.