alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2

Statement of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Knight Capital Group, Inc. (the Company) for the
quarter ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Steven Bisgay, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or, 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ STEVEN BISGAYName:

Steven BisgayTitle:

Chief Financial OfficerDate:

August 11, 2008


This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
/** * Rivet Software Inc. * * @copyright Copyright (c) 2006-2011 Rivet Software, Inc. All rights reserved. * Version 2.4.0.3 * */var Show = {};Show.LastAR = null,Show.hideAR = function(){	Show.LastAR.style.display = 'none';};Show.showAR = function ( link, id, win ){	if( Show.LastAR ){		Show.hideAR();	}	var ref = link;	do {		ref = ref.nextSibling;	} while (ref && ref.nodeName != 'TABLE');	if (!ref || ref.nodeName != 'TABLE') {		var tmp = win ?			win.document.getElementById(id) :			document.getElementById(id);		if( tmp ){			ref = tmp.cloneNode(true);			ref.id = '';			link.parentNode.appendChild(ref);		}	}	if( ref ){		ref.style.display = 'block';		Show.LastAR = ref;	}};Show.toggleNext = function( link ){	var ref = link;	do{		ref = ref.nextSibling;	}while( ref.nodeName != 'DIV' );	if( ref.style &&		ref.style.display &&		ref.style.display == 'none' ){		ref.style.display = 'block';		if( link.textContent ){			link.textContent = link.textContent.replace( '+', '-' );		}else{			link.innerText = link.innerText.replace( '+', '-' );		}	}else{		ref.style.display = 'none';		if( link.textContent ){			link.textContent = link.textContent.replace( '-', '+' );		}else{			link.innerText = link.innerText.replace( '-', '+' );		}	}};
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 143 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                        April 21, 1999.
    Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in order to 
consider the conference report to accompany the bill (H.R. 800) to provide for 
education flexibility partnerships. All points of order against the conference 
report and against its consideration are waived. The conference report shall be 
considered as read.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

# USINDOPACOM Statement on DPRK Missile Launch

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command Public Affairs

We are aware of the DPRK’s ballistic missile launch and are consulting closely with the Republic of Korea (ROK) and Japan, as well as other regional allies and partners.  The United States condemns these actions and calls on the DPRK to refrain from any further unlawful and destabilizing acts.  While we have assessed that this event does not pose an immediate threat to U.S. personnel, or territory, or to our allies, we will continue to monitor the situation.  The U.S. commitments to the defense of the ROK and Japan remain ironclad.

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT
#### John L. WARD and Richard DE TAMBLE, Appellants, v. FLEX-O-TUBE COMPANY and HARTURN, Inc., Appellees.

No. 11989.

United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit.

Oct. 8, 1954.

Smith & Huffaker, Detroit, Mich., for appellants.

Beaumont, Smith & Harris, Detroit, Mich., for appellee.

Before MARTIN, McALLISTER and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

This appeal by the plaintiffs from a judgment dismissing upon the merits their court action, brought to recover damages for alleged unjust enrichment arising out of a compromise agreement between the defendant appellees and the United States with relation to excess profits taxes, has been duly considered and heard upon the oral arguments and briefs of attorneys and upon the record in the cause:

From all of which it appears that the judgment of the district judge was correct for the reasons stated in his succinct opinion;

Accordingly, the judgment, D.C., 112 F.Supp. 658, is affirmed.
### §2257. Use of recruiting materials for public relations

The Secretary of Defense may use for public relations purposes of the Department of Defense any advertising materials developed for use for recruitment and retention of personnel for the armed forces. Any such use shall be under such conditions and subject to such restrictions as the Secretary of Defense shall prescribe.

(Added Pub. L. 106–65, div. A, title V, §574(a), Oct. 5, 1999, 113 Stat. 624.)
#### Paolo Vacaro, Respondent, v. Markus Pollak, Appellant.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Jenks, I-Iooker, Gaynor and Rich, JJ., concurred; Hirschberg, P. J., not voting.
# C_2013253EN.01001802.xml

| 3.9.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 253/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.9.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 253/18

---

Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries

2013/C 253/14

In accordance with Article 35(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), a decision has been taken to close the fishery as set down in the following table:

1

| Date and time of closure | 7.8.2013 |
| --- | --- |
| Duration | 7.8.2013-31.12.2013 |
| Member State | Germany |
| Stock or group of stocks | MAC/*8ABD. |
| Species | Mackerel (Scomber scombrus) |
| Zone | VIIIa, VIIIb and VIIId |
| Type(s) of fishing vessels | — |
| Reference number | 31/TQ40 |

Date and time of closure

7.8.2013

Duration

7.8.2013-31.12.2013

Member State

Germany

Stock or group of stocks

MAC/*8ABD.

Species

Mackerel (Scomber scombrus)

Scomber scombrus

Zone

VIIIa, VIIIb and VIIId

Type(s) of fishing vessels

—

Reference number

31/TQ40

---

(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.

1

---
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# U.S. Coast Guard Conducts Search and Rescue Exercise with Partners in Chuuk, Federated States of Micronesia 

By Lt.Cmdr. Christine Igisomar and Chief Warrant Officer Sara MuirU.S. Coast Guard Forces Micronesia / Sector Guam

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More
## PART IV—GENERAL ADMINISTRATION

Chap.
Sec.
861.
Secretary of the Navy: Miscellaneous Powers and Duties
8604
863.
Naval Vessels
8661
865.
Salvage Facilities
8701
867.
United States Naval Observatory
8715
869.
Naval Petroleum Reserves
8720
871.
Civilian Employees
8742
873.
Procurement of Supplies and Services
8752
875.
Disposal of Obsolete or Surplus Material
8761
877.
Quarters, Utilities, and Services
8771
879.
Ships' Stores and Commissary Stores
8801
881.
Claims
8821
883.
Prize
8851
885.
Stay of Judicial Proceedings
8891
887.
Naval Militia
8901
889.
Accountability and Responsibility
8911
891.
Names and Insignia
8921
893.
National Oceanographic Partnership Program
8931
895.
Issue of Serviceable Material Other Than to Armed Forces
8942
897.
Maritime Safety of Forces
8951

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**2018**—Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, §807(f)(2), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1838, redesignated items for chapters 631 to 669 as 861 to 897 and redesignated section numbers 7201 to 7921 as 8604 to 8951. Section numbers were conformed to the first section appearing in each chapter after renumbering by Pub. L. 115–232 to reflect the probable intent of Congress.

**2011**—Pub. L. 112–81, div. A, title III, §363(b), Dec. 31, 2011, 125 Stat. 1379, added item for chapter 669.

**2008**—Pub. L. 110–417, [div. A], title X, §1061(a)(6), Oct. 14, 2008, 122 Stat. 4612, added item for chapter 667 and struck out former item for chapter 667 "Issue of serviceable material other than to Armed Forces".

Pub. L. 110–181, div. A, title III, §377(b), Jan. 28, 2008, 122 Stat. 85, added item for chapter 667.

**2000**—Pub. L. 106–398, §1 [[div. A], title X, §1085(b)(3)(B)], Oct. 30, 2000, 114 Stat. 1654, 1654A–289, struck out "Related" after "Quarters, Utilities, and" in item for chapter 649.

**1996**—Pub. L. 104–201, div. A, title II, §282(a)(2), Sept. 23, 1996, 110 Stat. 2473, added item for chapter 665.

**1993**—Pub. L. 103–160, div. A, title VIII, §828(b)(3), Nov. 30, 1993, 107 Stat. 1714, struck out item for chapter 635 "Naval Aircraft".

**1984**—Pub. L. 98–525, title XV, §1532(a)(2), Oct. 19, 1984, 98 Stat. 2631, added item for chapter 663.

**1982**—Pub. L. 97–295, §1(50)(H), Oct. 12, 1982, 96 Stat. 1300, struck out "Naval Oceanographic Office and" after "United States" in item for chapter 639.

Pub. L. 97–295, §1(51)(B), Oct. 12, 1982, 96 Stat. 1300, added item for chapter 661.

**1980**—Pub. L. 96–513, title V, §513(1), Dec. 12, 1980, 94 Stat. 2931, substituted "7420" for "7421" in item for chapter 641.

**1962**—Pub. L. 87–533, §2, July 10, 1962, 76 Stat. 155, substituted "United States Naval Oceanographic" for "Hydrographic" in item for chapter 639.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM 1ST QUARTER
2000 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
*Identify the financial statement(s) to be referenced in the legend.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                           4,882
<SECURITIES>                                    11,182
<RECEIVABLES>                                   19,644
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                37,799
<PP&E>                                          44,182
<DEPRECIATION>                                  17,333
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  67,112
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           11,621
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            38
<OTHER-SE>                                      53,986
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    67,112
<SALES>                                         21,252
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                21,252
<CGS>                                           19,081
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   21,802
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (274)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (137)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (137)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (137)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.04)


</TABLE>
#### George W. FERGUSON, Appellant, v. Wyndham MANNING, Superintendent of the South Carolina Prison, Appellee.

No. 6873.

United States Court of Appeals Fourth Circuit.

Argued Oct. 5, 1954.

Decided Oct. 6, 1954.

C. T. Graydon, Columbia, S. C. (Hugh McAulay, Charlotte, N. C.) on the brief), for appellant.

William A. Dallis, Asst. Atty. Gen., of South Carolina (T. C. Callison, AttyGen. of South Carolina, on the brief), for appellee.

Before PARKER, Chief Judge, SOPER, Circuit Judge, and HOFFMAN, District Judge.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an order denying a writ of habeas corpus to a prisoner incarcerated under- the judgment and sentence of a court of the State of South Carolina. Petitioner was convicted under two counts of an indictment one of which charged conspiracy to set up a .numbers lottery and the other the actual setting up of the lottery. He was given a sentence of three years imprispn.ment and a fine under the conspiracy count and a sentence of one year and a fine under the cpunt charging the substantive offense. - On appeal to the Supreme Court, of the state, he contended that the law of the state did not authorize his conviction under the conspiracy count and that, in any event, imprisonment under that count could not exceed the term authorized for the substantive offense. The questions thus raised were squarely decided against appellant by the Supreme Court of South Carolina. State v. Ferguson, 221 S.C. 300, 70 S.E.2d 355. Nevertheless these are the questions and the only questions raised on the application to the court below for the writ of habeas corpus or on the appeal from the order of that court denying the writ.

We think that the writ was properly denied. It is too well settled to admit of argument that the federal courts are bound by the interpretation placed upon the statutes of a state by its highest court; and the only questions raised by the application for the writ are questions of this character which the Supreme Court of South Carolina has decided. Under such circumstances it was not incumbent on the court below to issue the writ. Brown v. Allen, 344 U.S. 443, 458, 73 S.Ct. 397, 407, 97 L.Ed. 469.

Affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 916 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 916

 To make technical amendments to section 10 of title 9, United States 
                                 Code.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 2, 1999

  Mr. Gekas introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To make technical amendments to section 10 of title 9, United States 
                                 Code.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. VACATION OF AWARDS.

    Section 10 of title 9, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) by indenting the margin of paragraphs (1) through (4) 
        of subsection (a) 2 ems;
            (2) by striking ``Where'' in such paragraphs and inserting 
        ``where'';
            (3) by striking the period at the end of paragraphs (1), 
        (2), and (3) of subsection (a) and inserting a semicolon and by 
        adding ``or'' at the end of paragraph (3);
            (4) by redesignating subsection (b) as subsection (c); and
            (5) in paragraph (5), by striking ``Where an award'' and 
        inserting ``If an award'', by inserting a comma after 
        ``expired'', and by redesignating the paragraph as subsection 
        (b).
                                 <all>
```
§ 162.359 What is the approval process for a leasehold mortgage of a residential lease? ( a ) When we receive leasehold mortgage that meets the requirements of this subpart, we will notify the parties of the date we receive it. We have 20 days from receipt of the executed leasehold mortgage, proof of required consents, and required documentation to approve or disapprove the leasehold mortgage. Our determination whether to approve the leasehold mortgage will be in writing and will state the basis for our approval or disapproval.
( b ) If we do not meet the deadline in this section, the lessee may take appropriate action under § 162.363.
EXHIBIT 32.2

Statement of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Knight Capital Group, Inc. (the Company) for the quarter ended March 31,
2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Steven Bisgay, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or, 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/    STEVEN BISGAYName: Steven BisgayTitle:    Chief Financial OfficerDate:   May 7, 2010


This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and shall not, except to the extent
required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>5
<LEGEND>
This  schedule  contains  summary  financial   information  extracted  from  the
Registrant's  unaudited interim  financial  statements for the nine month period
ended June 30, 2000 and is  qualified  in its  entirety by  reference  to those
financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>0001060755
<NAME> RIDGEWOOD ELECTRIC POWER TRUST V

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                       4,054,945
<SECURITIES>                                50,235,883<F1>
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,927,470<F2>
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              56,163,353
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           59,074
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                  55,058,059<F3>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                56,163,353
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               748,793
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,375,672
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (2,335,330)<F4>
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (2,335,330)<F4>
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (2,335,330)<F4>
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (2,503)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (2,503)

<FN>
<F1>Investment  in power  project  partnership  and  limited  liability  company
accounted for on equity basis.
<F2>Includes $452,207 due from affiliates.
<F3>Shareholders' equity of $55,299,444 less managing share-
holders' accumulated deficit of $241,385.
<F4>After addition of minority interest in Ridgewood WaterPure Corporation
loss of $291,549.
</FN>


</TABLE>