alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

 

# **I, Richard A. Hunt, certifythat:**

 

1.               I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of GB&T Bancshares,Inc.;

 

2.               Basedon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.               Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.               Theregistrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13(a)-15(e) and 15(d)-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

a)              Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

b)             Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport, based on such evaluation;

 

c)              Disclosedin the report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.               Theregistrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

a)              allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

 

b)             anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.

 
| Date:  | August 9,  2004                           |   |   |
|--------|-------------------------------------------|--------|--------|
|   |                                      |
|   | /s/ Richard  A. Hunt                      |   |
|   | Richard A.  Hunt, Chief Executive Officer |

 

1

----
#### Eva Aurand v. Ambrose J. Aurand et al.

1. Appeal *Bonds*— Effect *of One Given on Appeal from the Appellate to the Supreme Court upon One Given on an Appeal from the Circuit to the Appellate Court.*— The giving of an appeal bond on an appeal from the Appellate to the Supreme Court, does not operate to supersede and discharge the obligation created by a bond given on appeal from the Circuit to the Appellate Court, nor does the payment of the amount secured by one satisfy the amount due upon the other. The two securities are cumulative.

Debt, on appeal bonds. Error to the Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hon. John Gibbons, Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the March term, 1901.

Reversed and.remanded.

Opinion filed November 26, 1901.

Joseph J. Simmons, attorney for plaintiff in error.

Ho appearance by defendants in error.

Opinion

per Curiam:.

Two actions of debt on appeal bonds for $1,000 each were begun. The two cases were consolidated and heard together in the Circuit Court (Hos. 156,011 ■ and 186,723), being, respectively, to assess damages on breach assigned on the bonds given on appeal to this court from the Circuit Court, and on appeal from this court to the Supreme Court.

The Circuit Court held', in effect, that there was a satisfaction of both bonds by the showing that one of them had been paid.

*525We do not think so. The decree was for $30 a month alimony due the wife, and was for a sum constantly being augmented, as fast as the installments of alimony matured.

The giving of the appeal bond on the appeal from this court to the Supreme Court, did not operate to supersede and discharge the obligation created by the bond given on the appeal from the Circuit Court to this court, nor did the payment of the amount secured by the first satisfy the amount due on the last. The two securities were cumulative and were liable until paid. Aurand v. Aurand, 87 Ill. App. 29; Becker v. The People, 164 Ill. 267.

Huntington, the surety, who signed both bonds, will continue liable until payment of both bonds is made.

The judgment of the Circuit Court will therefore be reversed and the cause remanded.
### **CHAPTER 73—ANNUITIES BASED ON RETIRED OR RETAINER PAY**

Subchapter
Sec.
I.
Retired Serviceman's Family Protection Plan
1431
II.
Survivor Benefit Plan
1447
[III.
Repealed]

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**2004**—Pub. L. 108–375, div. A, title VI, §644(b)(2), Oct. 28, 2004, 118 Stat. 1961, struck out item for subchapter III "Supplemental Survivor Benefit Plan", effective Apr. 1, 2008.

**1990**—Pub. L. 101–510, div. A, title VI, §631(1), title XIV, §1484(l)(4)(A), Nov. 5, 1990, 104 Stat. 1580, 1719, amended Pub. L. 101–189, §1404(a)(2), see 1989 Amendment note below.

**1989**—Pub. L. 101–189, div. A, title XIV, §1404(a)(2), Nov. 29, 1989, 103 Stat. 1586, as amended by Pub. L. 101–510, div. A, title VI, §631(1), title XIV, §1484(l)(4)(A), Nov. 5, 1990, 104 Stat. 1580, 1719, added item for subchapter III, effective Apr. 1, 1992.

**1980**—Pub. L. 96–513, title V, §511(54)(A), Dec. 12, 1980, 94 Stat. 2925, amended chapter heading to read: "ANNUITIES BASED ON RETIRED OR RETAINER PAY".

**1972**—Pub. L. 92–425, §1(1), Sept. 21, 1972, 86 Stat. 706, added subchapter analysis and amended chapter heading by inserting "; SURVIVOR BENEFIT PLAN" after "PAY" which could not be executed as directed in view of amendment by Pub. L. 87–381.

**1961**—Pub. L. 87–381, §1(1), Oct. 4, 1961, 75 Stat. 810, substituted "RETIRED SERVICEMAN'S FAMILY PROTECTION PLAN" for "ANNUITIES BASED ON RETIRED OR RETAINER PAY" in chapter heading.
### Clastic sedimentation in Deep Springs Valley, California

By: L. K. Lustig

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/pp352F

#### Links

- More information:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**                            (html)
-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 8**                            (1470 pdf)                        
  - **Plate 9**                            (1695 pdf) 
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 25 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                         July 19, 1999.
Whereas the Governments of Peru and Ecuador have been engaged in a serious 
        border dispute dating as far back as Spanish colonial times;
Whereas the Rio Protocol signed in 1942 between Peru and Ecuador, and guaranteed 
        by four nations including the United States, failed to settle the 
        dispute;
Whereas Peru and Ecuador have gone to war three times over the border areas with 
        the most recent clashes taking place in 1995 resulting in dozens of 
        deaths on both sides; and
Whereas the Governments of Peru and Ecuador recently completed long and 
        difficult negotiations and reached a final settlement of the dispute on 
        October 26, 1998: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) congratulates the Governments of Peru and Ecuador for ending the 
        border dispute between their two countries which has been a source of 
        armed conflict for over 50 years;
            (2) commends the Presidents of both nations for personally becoming 
        involved in the negotiations and for reaching this historic agreement;
            (3) recognizes the commitment of the Presidents of the guarantor 
        nations of Argentina, Brazil, and Chile, along with the United States, 
        in seeking a viable solution to the border dispute;
            (4) urges both the Governments of Peru and Ecuador to honor the 
        border settlement and to cooperate with each other in bringing peace, 
        stability, and economic development to the troubled area; and
            (5) reaffirms the commitment of the United States to support both 
        governments in the implementation of the border agreement.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
#### Henry H. Persons and Another, as Receivers, etc., Appellants, v. William H. Gardner and Others, Respondents.

Motion for leave to appeal to Court of Appeals denied, with ten dollars costs.
### §2492. Nonappropriated fund instrumentalities: contracts with other agencies and instrumentalities to provide and obtain goods and services

An agency or instrumentality of the Department of Defense that supports the operation of the exchange system, or the operation of a morale, welfare, and recreation system, of the Department of Defense may enter into a contract or other agreement with another element of the Department of Defense or with another Federal department, agency, or instrumentality—

(1) to provide or obtain goods and services beneficial to the efficient management and operation of the exchange system or that morale, welfare, and recreation system; or

(2) to provide or obtain food services beneficial to the efficient management and operation of the dining facilities on military installations offering food services to members of the armed forces.

(Added Pub. L. 104–201, div. A, title III, §341(a)(1), Sept. 23, 1996, 110 Stat. 2488, §2482a; renumbered §2492, Pub. L. 108–375, div. A, title VI, §651(c)(3), Oct. 28, 2004, 118 Stat. 1972; amended Pub. L. 113–291, div. A, title VI, §632, Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3405.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 2492 was renumbered section 2489 of this title.

#### Amendments

2014—Pub. L. 113–291 substituted "Federal department, agency, or instrumentality—" for "Federal department, agency, or instrumentality to provide or obtain goods and services beneficial to the efficient management and operation of the exchange system or that morale, welfare, and recreation system." and added pars. (1) and (2).

2004—Pub. L. 108–375 renumbered section 2482a of this title as this section.
IV

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 254

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives condemning recent

hate crimes in Illinois and Indiana.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 19, 1999

Ms. SCHAKOWSKY (for herself, Mr. HOSTETTLER, and Mr. PORTER) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on

the Judiciary

RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives

condemning recent hate crimes in Illinois and Indiana.

Whereas diversity and tolerance are essential principles of an

open and free society;

Whereas all people deserve to be safe within their communities, free to live, work and worship without fear of violence and bigotry;

Whereas crimes motivated by hatred against African-Americans, Jews, Asian-Americans, or other groups undermine

the fundamental values of our Nation;

Whereas the communities of Skokie, the West Rogers Park

neighborhood of Chicago, Northbrook, and Urbana, Illinois, and Bloomington, Indiana, were terrorized by hate
2

•HRES 254 IH

crimes over the Fourth of July weekend, a time when our

Nation celebrates its commitment to freedom and liberty;

Whereas hate crimes tear at the fabric of American society,

leave scars on victims and their families, and weaken our

sense of community and purpose;

Whereas Ricky Byrdsong, at age 43, was a loving husband

and father, an inspiring community leader, and a former

basketball coach at Northwestern University;

Whereas Ricky Byrdsong was a man of deep religious faith

who touched the lives of countless people and whose

death is mourned by his family, friends, and community,

and by the Nation;

Whereas Won-Joon Yoon, at age 26, was the only son in a

family of 6, and was soon to become a doctoral student

in Economics at Indiana University;

Whereas Won-Joon Yoon was a man who, through his demeanor and firmly-held Christian beliefs, positively influenced those who knew him, and whose death is mourned

by his family, friends, and community, and by the citizens of the United States and Korea; and

Whereas individuals who commit crimes based on hate and

bigotry must be held responsible for their actions and

must be stopped from spreading violence: Now, therefore,

be it

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives—

2 (1) condemns the senseless violence that oc3 curred in Illinois and Indiana over the Fourth of

4 July weekend;
3

•HRES 254 IH

1 (2) conveys its deepest sympathy to the victims

2 and their families;

3 (3) condemns the culture of hate and the hate

4 groups that foster such violent acts;

5 (4) commends the communities of Illinois and

6 Indiana for uniting to condemn these acts of hate in

7 their neighborhoods;

8 (5) commends the efforts of Federal, State, and

9 local law enforcement officials; and

10 (6) reaffirms its commitment to a society that

11 fully respects and protects all people, regardless of

12 race, religion, or ethnicity.

Æ
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# USINDOPACOM hosts Philippine President R. Marcos Jr.

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command Public Affairs

                HONOLULU  –              
Philippine President Ferdinand R. Marcos Jr. and Gen. Romeo Brawner Jr., Armed Forces of the Philippines Chief of Staff, visited U.S. Indo-Pacific Command at Camp H.M. Smith during their visit to Honolulu, Nov. 17-19.

Marcos and Brawner met with Adm. John C. Aquilino, commander, USINDOPACOM, who provided an operational overview and discussed regional security cooperation.

The week prior to the visit of the president, Philippine and U.S. staff members conducted high-level exchanges and integrated planning efforts for future bilateral and multilateral training opportunities.

While in Hawaii, Marcos also met with Ambassador to the Philippines MaryKay Loss Carlson and Consul General of the Philippines Emil T. Fernandez, visited the Daniel K. Inouye Asia-Pacific Center for Security Studies, and participated in a wreath-laying at the USS Arizona Memorial in Pearl Harbor.

The events further developed the strong democratic, economic and strategic partnership with the Philippines codified in the 1951 U.S.-Philippines Mutual Defense Treaty. USINDOPACOM is committed to enhancing stability in the Indo-Pacific region with its Allies and partners by promoting security cooperation, encouraging peaceful development, responding to contingencies, deterring aggression and, when necessary, fighting to win.

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 99-50910

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

RAUL GARCIA, also known as Richard Losoya,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. A-96-CR-48-03-SS

--------------------

June 13, 2000

Before JOLLY, DAVIS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Robert Fiedler, the attorney appointed to represent Raul

Garcia, has moved to withdraw and filed a brief as required by

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Although Garcia has

been informed of counsel’s motion, he has not filed a response. 

Our review of counsel’s brief and independent review of the

record discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly,

counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED. Counsel is excused from

further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. 

See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
§ 162.421 How much monetary compensation must be paid under a business lease of individually owned Indian land? ( a ) A business lease of individually owned Indian land must require payment of not less than fair market rental before any adjustments, based on a fixed amount, a percentage of the projected income, or some other method, unless paragraphs (b) or (c) of this section permit a lesser amount. The lease must establish how the fixed amount, percentage, or combination will be calculated and the frequency at which the payments will be made.
( b ) We may approve a lease of individually owned Indian land that provides for the payment of nominal compensation, or less than a fair market rental, if: ( 1 ) The Indian landowners execute a written waiver of the right to receive fair market rental; and
( 2 ) We determine it is in the Indian landowners' best interest, based on factors including, but not limited to: ( i ) The lessee is a member of the immediate family, as defined in § 162.003, of an individual Indian landowner;
( ii ) The lessee is a co-owner in the leased tract;
( iii ) A special relationship or circumstances exist that we believe warrant approval of the lease;
( iv ) The lease is for religious, educational, recreational, cultural, or other public purposes;
( v ) We have waived the requirement for a valuation under paragraph (e) of this section.
( c ) We may approve a lease that provides for payment of less than a fair market rental during the pre-development or construction periods, if we determine it is in the Indian landowners' best interest. The lease must specify the amount of the compensation and the applicable periods.
( d ) We will require a valuation in accordance with § 162.422, unless: ( 1 ) 100 percent of the Indian landowners submit to us a written request to waive the valuation requirement; or
( 2 ) We waive the requirement under paragraph (e) of this section.
( e ) If the owners of the applicable percentage of interests under § 162.012 of this part execute a business lease on behalf of all of the Indian landowners of a fractionated tract, the lease must provide that the non-consenting Indian landowners, and those on whose behalf we have consented, receive a fair market rental, as determined by a valuation, unless we waive the requirement because the tribe or lessee will construct infrastructure improvements on, or serving, the leased premises, and we determine it is in the best interest of all the landowners.