9608 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 34 / Friday, February 18, 2011 / Notices 

Trelease, Office of Surface Mining 

Reclamation and Enforcement, 1951 

Constitution Ave., NW., Room 202— 

SIB, Washington, DC 20240, or 

electronically to jtrelease@osmre.gov. 

Please refer to OMB control number 

1029–0114 in your correspondence. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: To 

receive a copy of the information 

collection request contact John Trelease 

at (202) 208–2783, or electronically at 

jtrelease@osmre.gov. You may also 

review this collection by going to 

http://www.reginfo.gov (Information 

Collection Review, Currently Under 

Review, Agency is Department of the 

Interior, DOI–OSMRE). 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Office 

of Management and Budget (OMB) 

regulations at 5 CFR 1320, which 

implement provisions of the Paperwork 

Reduction Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–13), 

require that interested members of the 

public and affected agencies have an 

opportunity to comment on information 

collection and recordkeeping activities 

[see 5 CFR 1320.8(d)]. OSM has 

submitted a request to OMB to renew its 

approval of the collection of information 

contained in a series of technical 

evaluation customer surveys. OSM is 

requesting a 3-year term of approval for 

the information collection activity. 

An agency may not conduct or 

sponsor, and a person is not required to 

respond to, a collection of information 

unless it displays a currently valid OMB 

control number. The OMB control 

number for this collection of 

information is 1029–0114. 

As required under 5 CFR 1320.8(d), a 

Federal Register notice soliciting 

comments on this collection of 

information was published on 

November 5, 2010 (75 FR 68376). No 

comments were received. This notice 

provides the public with an additional 

30 days in which to comment on the 

following information collection 

activity: 

Title: Technical Evaluation Surveys. 

OMB Control Number: 1029–0114. 

Summary: The series of surveys are 

needed to ensure that technical 

assistance activities, technology transfer 

activities and technical forums are 

useful for those who participate or 

receive the assistance. Specifically, 

representatives from State and Tribal 

regulatory and reclamation authorities 

are the primary respondents, although 

representatives of industry, 

environmental or citizen groups, or the 

public, may be recipients of the 

assistance or may participate in these 

forums. These surveys will be the 

primary means through which OSM 

evaluates its performance in meeting the 

performance goals outlined in its annual 

plans developed pursuant to the 

Government Performance and Results 

Act. 

Bureau Form Number: None. 

Frequency of Collection: Once. 

Description of Respondents: 

Individuals who request information or 

assistance, although generally States 

and Tribal employees. 

Total Annual Responses: 500. 

Total Annual Burden Hours: 42. 

Send comments on the need for the 

collection of information for the 

performance of the functions of the 

agency; the accuracy of the agency’s 

burden estimates; ways to enhance the 

quality, utility and clarity of the 

information collection; and ways to 

minimize the information collection 

burdens on respondents, such as use of 

automated means of collections of the 

information, to the addresses listed 

under ADDRESSES. Please refer to the 

appropriate OMB control number in all 

correspondence. 

Before including your address, phone 

number, e-mail address, or other 

personal identifying information in your 

comment, you should be aware that 

your entire comment—including your 

personal identifying information—may 

be made publicly available at any time. 

While you can ask us in your comment 

to withhold your personal identifying 

information from public review, we 

cannot guarantee that we will be able to 

do so. 

Dated: February 11, 2011. 

John A. Trelease, 

Acting Chief, Division of Regulatory Support. 

[FR Doc. 2011–3595 Filed 2–17–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310–05–M 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation No. 731–TA–920 (Review) 

(Remand)] 

Certain Welded Large Diameter Line 

Pipe From Mexico 

AGENCY: United States International 

Trade Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: The U.S. International Trade 

Commission (‘‘Commission’’) hereby 

gives notice of its remand proceeding 

with respect to its negative 

determination in the five-year review of 

the antidumping duty order on certain 

welded large diameter line pipe from 

Mexico. For further information 

concerning the conduct of this 

proceeding and rules of general 

application, consult the Commission’s 

Rules of Practice and Procedure, part 

201, subparts A through E (19 CFR part 

201), and part 207, subpart A (19 CFR 

part 207). 

DATES: Effective Date: February 18, 

2011. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Karl 

von Schriltz (202–205–3096), Office of 

General Counsel, U.S. International 

Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., 

Washington, DC 20436. Hearingimpaired persons can obtain 

information on this matter by contacting 

the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202– 

205–1810. Persons with mobility 

impairments who will need special 

assistance in gaining access to the 

Commission should contact the Office 

of the Secretary at 202–205–2000. 

General information concerning the 

Commission may also be obtained by 

accessing its Internet server (http:// 

www.usitc.gov). The public record of 

Investigation No. 731–TA–920 (Review) 

may be viewed on the Commission’s 

electronic docket (EDIS) at http:// 

edis.usitc.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background.—In October 2007, the 

Commission determined that revocation 

of the antidumping duty order covering 

certain welded large diameter line pipe 

from Mexico would not be likely to lead 

to continuation or recurrence of material 

injury to an industry in the United 

States within a reasonably foreseeable 

time. On April 21, 2008, six months 

after completion of the Commission’s 

review, the Mexican producer Tuberias 

Procarsa, S.A. de C.V. (‘‘Procarsa’’) 

attempted to file with the Commission 

a revised foreign producers’ 

questionnaire response which sought to 

revise certain aspects of its originally 

reported capacity, production, and 

shipment data. On April 24, 2008, the 

Commission rejected the submission on 

the grounds that it was untimely filed. 

On November 21, 2007, the domestic 

producer United States Steel 

Corporation (‘‘U.S. Steel’’) filed a request 

for review of the Commission’s 

determination by a binational panel 

under Article 1904 of the North 

American Free Trade Agreement. The 

parties completed briefing in the 

proceeding in 2008 and 2009. The Panel 

held a hearing in the proceeding on July 

22, 2010. 

On January 18, 2011, the Panel issued 

an opinion in the matter. In its opinion, 

the Panel affirmed the Commission’s 

reliance on the existence of differing 

conditions of competition for Mexico 

and Japan when deciding not to exercise 

its discretion to cumulate the subject 

imports from those countries. The Panel 

also held that U.S. Steel was barred 

WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with NOTICES

Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 34 / Friday, February 18, 2011 / Notices 9609 

from raising in this proceeding 

‘‘arguments regarding the asserted 

discrepancy between the questionnaire 

responses and the staff’s finding that the 

Mexican producers reported theoretical 

capacity,’’ finding that U.S. Steel failed 

to exhaust its administrative remedies 

before the Commission. Panel Opinion 

at 25. 

Nonetheless, the Panel remanded the 

Commission’s determination so that the 

Commission could take into account 

Procarsa’s revised foreign producers’ 

questionnaire response and re-consider 

its cumulation and likely injury analysis 

for Mexico in light of the revised 

response. Specifically, the Panel 

indicated that the Commission should 

consider the revised data in light of its 

potential impact on the Commission’s 

analysis of the Mexican industry’s home 

market orientation, its capacity trends, 

and the presence of Mexican imports in 

the U.S. market. The Panel noted that 

the revised data did not affect the 

Commission’s finding concerning 

Procarsa’s product range during the 

period. 

Participation in the proceeding.— 

Only those persons who were interested 

parties that participated in the review 

(i.e., persons listed on the Commission 

Secretary’s service list) and also parties 

to the NAFTA panel proceeding may 

participate in the remand proceeding. 

Such persons need not make any 

additional filings with the Commission 

to participate in the remand proceeding, 

unless they are adding new individuals 

to the list of persons entitled to receive 

business proprietary information under 

administrative protective order. 

Business proprietary information (‘‘BPI’’) 

referred to during the remand 

proceeding will be governed, as 

appropriate, by the administrative 

protective order issued in the review. 

Written Submissions.—The 

Commission is reopening the record in 

this proceeding for the sole purpose of 

accepting Procarsa’s revised foreign 

producers’ questionnaire response into 

the record. It will not otherwise accept 

the submission of new factual 

information for the record. The 

Commission will permit the parties to 

file comments concerning the new 

factual information submitted on the 

record during the remand proceeding. 

Those comments should be limited 

solely to the issue of whether and how 

the data contained in Procarsa’s revised 

foreign producer’s questionnaire will 

affect the Commission’s cumulation and 

likely injury findings for Mexico, 

including its findings relating to the 

Mexican industry’s home market 

orientation, its capacity trends, and the 

presence of Mexican imports in the U.S. 

market. The parties may not use this 

opportunity to comment on any other 

issue, including any ‘‘asserted 

discrepancy between the questionnaire 

responses and the staff’s finding that the 

Mexican producers reported theoretical 

capacity.’’ Panel Opinion at 25. 

The comments must be based solely 

on the information in the Commission’s 

record. The Commission will reject 

submissions containing additional 

factual information or arguments 

pertaining to issues other than those on 

which the Panel has remanded this 

matter. The deadline for filing 

comments is March 8, 2011. Comments 

shall be limited to no more than twenty 

(20) double-spaced and single-sided 

pages of textual material. 

All written submissions must conform 

with the provisions of section 201.8 of 

the Commission’s rules; any 

submissions that contain BPI must also 

conform with the requirements of 

sections 201.6, 207.3, and 207.7 of the 

Commission’s rules. The Commission’s 

rules do not authorize filing of 

submissions with the Secretary by 

facsimile or electronic means, except to 

the extent permitted by section 201.8 of 

the Commission’s rules, as amended, 67 

FR 68036 (November 8, 2002). 

In accordance with sections 201.16(c) 

and 207.3 of the Commission’s rules, 

each document filed by a party to this 

proceeding must be served on all other 

such parties, and a certificate of service 

must be timely filed. The Secretary will 

not accept a document for filing without 

a certificate of service. 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: February 15, 2011. 

William R. Bishop, 

Hearings and Meetings Coordinator. 

[FR Doc. 2011–3766 Filed 2–17–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Notice of Proposed Consent Decree 

Under the Clean Air Act 

Notice is hereby given that on 

February 14, 2011, a proposed Consent 

Decree in United States et al. v. Merced 

Power LLC, Civil Action No. 1:11-cv00241, was lodged with the United 

States District Court for the Eastern 

District of California. 

The Consent Decree in this Clean Air 

Act enforcement action resolves 

allegations by the Environmental 

Protection Agency and the San Joaquin 

Valley Unified Air Pollution Control 

District (‘‘District’’), asserted in a 

complaint filed together with the 

Consent Decree, under Section 113(b) of 

the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. 7413(b), for 

alleged environmental violations at 

defendant’s biomass electric generating 

facilities in Merced, California. The 

violations include, among others, a 

failure to: Comply with numerous 

conditions contained in Federally 

enforceable permits issued for the 

facility, including those related to 

emissions of pollutants; install and 

operate required pollution control 

technology; undertake periodic 

equipment testing; and to submit 

required reports. The proposed Consent 

Decree would require defendant to 

install additional emissions monitoring 

equipment at their facility, pay a total of 

$492,000 in civil penalties to the United 

States and the District, and comply with 

permit conditions or face stipulated 

penalties during approximately two 

years following court approval of the 

consent decree. 

The Department of Justice will receive 

comments relating to the proposed 

Consent Decree for a period of thirty 

(30) days from the date of this 

publication. Comments should be 

addressed to the Assistant Attorney 

General, Environment and Natural 

Resources Division, and either e-mailed 

to pubcomment-ees.enrd@usdoj.gov or 

mailed to P.O. Box 7611, U.S. 

Department of Justice, Washington, DC 

20044–7611, and should refer to the 

matter as United States et al. v. Merced 

Power LLC, DOJ Ref. No. 90–5–2–1– 

09903. 

The proposed Consent Decree may be 

examined at the following Regional 

Office of the United States 

Environmental Protection Agency: 

Region 9, 75 Hawthorne Street, San 

Francisco, California 94105. The 

Consent Decree may also be examined at 

the Office of the United States Attorney, 

501 I Street, Suite 10–100, Sacramento, 

California 95814. 

During the public comment period, 

the proposed agreement may also be 

examined on the following Department 

of Justice Web site: http:// 

www.usdoj.gov/enrd/ 

Consent_Decrees.html. Copies of the 

proposed agreement may also be 

obtained by mail from the Consent 

Decree Library, P.O. Box 7611, U.S. 

Department of Justice, Washington, DC 

20044–7611 or by faxing or e-mailing a 

request to Tonia Fleetwood 

(tonia.fleetwood@usdoj.gov), fax no. 

(202) 514–0097, phone confirmation 

number (202) 514–1547. In requesting 

from the Consent Decree Library a copy 

of the consent decree, please enclose a 

check payable to the U.S. Treasury in 

the amount of $14.50 (25 cents per page 

WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with NOTICES