alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
T his document is not available in FDMS since it is a

copyrighted publication and may not be reproduced without consent of the copyright holder. Contact the EPA Docket Center, Public Reading Room to view or receive a copy of this document. Request s for copies may be made as follows: In person /writing : E nvironm ental P rotection A gency , Docket Center 1301 Constitution Ave NW, 2822T , Room3334 Washington, DC. 20004 Telephone: 202 - 566 - 1744 Fax: 202 - 566 - 9744 Em ail: docket - customerservice@e pa.gov
### Regional water table (2016) in the Mojave River and Morongo groundwater basins, southwestern Mojave Desert, California

By: Meghan C. Dick**Adam Kjos**

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/sim3391

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (34 MB pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Data Release:  **Data Release**  -  - Regional Water Table (2016) in the Mojave River and Morongo Groundwater Basins, Southwestern Mojave Desert, California Data Release
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

First posted December 7, 2017

**For additional information, contact:**
California Water Science CenterU.S. Geological Survey6000 J Street, Placer HallSacramento, California 95819

From January to April 2016, the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), the Mojave Water Agency, and other local water districts made approximately 1,200 water-level measurements in about 645 wells located within 15 separate groundwater basins, collectively referred to as the Mojave River and Morongo groundwater basins. These data document recent conditions and, when compared with older data, changes in groundwater levels. A water-level contour map was drawn using data measured in 2016 that shows the elevation of the water table and general direction of groundwater movement for most of the groundwater basins. Historical water-level data stored in the USGS National Water Information System (https://waterdata.usgs.gov/nwis/) database were used in conjunction with data collected for this study to construct 37 hydrographs to show long-term (1930–2016) and short-term (1990–2016) water-level changes in the study area.

#### Suggested Citation

Dick, M.C., and Kjos, A.R., 2017, Regional water table (2016) in the Mojave River and Morongo groundwater basins, southwestern Mojave Desert, California: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Map 3391, scale 1:170,000, https://doi.org/10.3133/sim3391.

ISSN: 2329-132X (online)

#### Study Area

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                         1,284,943
<SECURITIES>                                   125,600
<RECEIVABLES>                                  389,694
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               2,801,733
<PP&E>                                         2,864,109
<DEPRECIATION>                                 1,014,784
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 6,128,916
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1,924,467
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       6,139,307
<OTHER-SE>                                     0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   6,128,916
<SALES>                                        23,464,336
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               23,542,036
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  22,354,258
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             108,089
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                1,079,689
<INCOME-TAX>                                   7,488
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            1,072,201
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   1,072,201
<EPS-BASIC>                                    .16
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .16



</TABLE>
#### Anna M. Steuerwald, Appellant, *v.*John W. Jackson, Respondent.

Second Department,

January 10, 1908.

Landlord and tenant — summary proceedings — final order — evidence — proof of agency by agent — authority to renew lease.

.There is no judgment, technically speaking, in summary proceedings, and an appeal should be from the final order.

Because an agency as against the principal cannot he established by the declarations of an alleged agent, it does not follow that the agency cannot be proved by testimony of the agent.

Thus, when a landlord calls her husband as a witness in summary proceedings and he testifies on direct examination that he was her agent, it is competent evidence of that fact.

An agent having authority to rent for a year, may renew an existing lease for that period.

Appeal by the plaintiff, Anna M. Steuerwald, from an order of the Municipal Court of the city of New York, borough of Brooklyn, denying the plaintiff’s motion to set aside the verdict of a jury and for a new trial.

*570*William O. Miles,*for the appellant.

*J. Edward Murphy,*for the respondent.

Jenks, J.:

This is a summary proceeding by landlord against tenant. The tenant answered that he held, under a renewal of his year’s lease for an additional year. ' The issue thus joined was tried before a jury. The verdict was for the tenant. This appeal is from an order-refusing to set aside the verdict and to order a new trial. There is no appeal from any' final order. An appeal is taken also from the *“*judgment.” There is no judgment, technically speaking, for the termination of such proceeding is a final order. (Code Civ. Proc. § 2249.) The tenant relied upon a parol lease for one year in renewal of an existing written lease for one year, and his testimony is that such renewal-was made by the agent of the landlord, who wan her husband. The appellant insists that there is failure of proof of agency. It is true, as contended, that agency as against the principal cannot be established by the declarations of the alleged agent. But this rule often misleads to the contention that such agency cannot be proved by the testimony of the agent, which is not the rule. *(Brown*v. *Cone,*80 App. Div. 414; 2 Greenl. Ev. [15th ed.] § 63.) The landlord called her husband as a witness, and he testified upon her examination that he was the agent of the premises and-that he had been in charge.'of renting *them*for two years — a period covering the time when the alleged renewal was " given. As such ah agent he had authority to rent the premises, for one year (McAdam Landl. & Ten. [3d ed.] § 253, and authorities cited), as he had done. And 1 think that he also as such agent had the right to renew the lease for a year. *(Pittsburg Mfg. Co.*v. *Fidelity Title & Trust Co.,*207 Penn. St. 223.) The testimony as to the renewal of the lease suffices to sustain the finding of that fact by the jury.

The order is affirmed, with costs.

Hooker, Gaynor, High and Miller, JJ., concurred.

. Judgment and order of the Municipal Court affirmed, with costs.
§ 167.13 Trespass. The owner of any livestock grazing in trespass in Navajo Tribal ranges shall be subject to action by the Navajo Court of Indian Offenses as provided in part 11 of this chapter, however, upon recommendations of the District Grazing Committee, first offenses may be referred to the Central Grazing Committee and the Superintendent or his authorized representative for proper settlement out of court. The following acts are considered as trespass: ( a ) Any person who sells an entire permit must dispose of all his livestock or be in trespass. Any person selling a portion of his permit must not run more stock than covered by his remaining permit, or be subject to immediate trespass.
( b ) All persons running livestock in excess of their permitted number must by April 25, 1959, either obtain permits to cover their total livestock numbers or reduce to their permitted number, or be in trespass. Additional time may be granted in unusual individual cases as determined and approved by the District Grazing Committee, General Grazing Committee, and the Superintendent or his authorized representative.
( c ) Failure to comply with the provisions in § 167.9, shall be considered as trespass.
( d ) Any person who willfully allows his livestock to drift from one district to another shall be subject to trespass action. The grazing of livestock in customary use areas extending over District Boundary lines, when such customary use areas are defined and agreed upon by the District Grazing Committees involved, shall not be considered as willful trespass.
( e ) The owner of any livestock who violates the customary or established use units of other permittees shall be subject to trespass action.
[22 FR 10578, Dec. 24, 1957, as amended at 24 FR 1178, Feb. 17, 1959. Redesignated at 47 FR 13327, Mar. 30, 1982]
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News

Readout of Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. CQ Brown, Jr.’s Video Teleconference with People’s Liberation Army of China Chief of the Joint Staff Department Gen. Liu ZhenliDecember 21, 2023 — Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. CQ Brown, Jr., spoke with People’s Liberation Army of China Chief of the Joint Staff Department Gen. Liu Zhenli by video teleconference today. This was the first time the leaders spoke since Gen. Brown became Chairman... MORE 

----

2024 (325)2023 (825)2022 (1193)2021 (1066)2020 (1083)2019 (1166)2018 (1116)2017 (1356)2016 (1475)2015 (1408)2014 (904)2013 (32)2012 (4)

About DoDDoD CareersJoin the MilitaryNewsUSA.govPhotos & VideosPrivacy & SecurityTop Issues

US INDOPACOM Inspector GeneralDoD Inspector General Accessibility/Section 508DoD FOIAUS INDOPACOM FOIALink DisclaimerNo FEAR ActRecovery ActINDOPACOM Webmaster

                  - Facebook
                  - X
                  - YouTube
                  - Instagram
                  - RSS

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
<TABLE> <S> <C>


                                                 


<ARTICLE>                      5
<MULTIPLIER>                   1000
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  3-Mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>              Dec-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                   Sep-30-1998
<CASH>                         7,469
<SECURITIES>                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                  80,306
<ALLOWANCES>                   0
<INVENTORY>                    59,290
<CURRENT-ASSETS>               152,314
<PP&E>                         155,536
<DEPRECIATION>                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                 378,905
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>          72,135
<BONDS>                        305,808
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>          0
<PREFERRED>                    0
<COMMON>                       0 
<OTHER-SE>                     (9,421)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>   378,905
<SALES>                        90,512
<TOTAL-REVENUES>               90,512
<CGS>                          76,456
<TOTAL-COSTS>                  85,485
<OTHER-EXPENSES>               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>             7,627
<INCOME-PRETAX>                (3,568)
<INCOME-TAX>                   248
<INCOME-CONTINUING>            (3,816)
<DISCONTINUED>                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                0
<CHANGES>                      0
<NET-INCOME>                   (3,816)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                  0


</TABLE>
#### David Mills, Appellant, v Raycom Media, Inc., et al., Respondents.

[824 NYS2d 845]

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Onondaga County (Anthony J. Paris, J.), entered May 2, 2005. The order granted defendants’ motions to dismiss the first amended complaint.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: Plaintiff commenced this defamation action against Raycom Media, Inc., Raycom, Inc., WSTM-TY Inc. and James Kenyon (collectively, Raycom defendants) and against defendant Marjory York based upon a two-part investigative series entitled “A Cry for Help.” The series was aired on WSTM-TV News in February 2002, and a version of the series was published on WSTM-TV’s Web site. According to the series, the Cayuga County Family Court and the Cayuga County Department of Health and Human Services failed to prevent defendant Marjory York’s child from being exposed to plaintiff despite numerous allegations that plaintiff had sexually abused the child. We note at the outset that plaintiff does not address in his brief the propriety of the dismissal of the first amended complaint against defendants WSTM-TY Inc. or Raycom, Inc. and thus is deemed to have abandoned any issue with respect to the dismissal of the first amended complaint against those defendants (see *Ciesinski v Town of Aurora,*202 AD2d 984 [1994]).

With respect to the remaining corporate defendant and its employee, defendant James Kenyon, we conclude that Supreme Court properly granted that part of the motion of the Raycom *1353defendants seeking dismissal of the first amended complaint against those two defendants pursuant to Civil Rights Law § 74 and CPLR 3211 (a) (1) and (7). Civil Rights Law § 74 provides in relevant part that “[a] civil action cannot be maintained against any person ... or corporation[ ] for the publication of a fair and true report of any judicial proceeding . . . .” The Raycom defendants submitted evidence establishing that, in a neglect proceeding in Cayuga County Family Court, plaintiff was alleged to have sexually abused the child at issue in the series. The neglect proceeding was eventually resolved pursuant to a stipulation in which plaintiff relinquished his visitation and custody rights with respect to the child and the neglect petition was dismissed. We conclude that defendants Raycom Media, Inc. and James Kenyon thereby established that the material in the series was a fair and true report of the Family Court neglect proceeding within the meaning of Civil Rights Law § 74 *(see Glendora v Gannett Suburban Newspapers,*201 AD2d 620 [1994], *lv denied*83 NY2d 757 [1994]; *cf. Seltzer v Fields,*20 AD2d 60, 63-64 [1963], *affd*14 NY2d 624 [1964]; *Lacker v Engel,*33 AD3d 10 [2006]). Finally, we conclude that the court properly granted the motion of defendant Marjory York seeking dismissal of the first amended complaint against her as time-barred *(see*CPLR 215 [3]). Present—Scudder, J.P, Kehoe, Martoche and Green, JJ.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 26 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 26

Congratulating the people of Guatemala on the second anniversary of the 
               signing of the peace accords in Guatemala.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 19, 1999

Mr. Gallegly submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                the Committee on International Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Congratulating the people of Guatemala on the second anniversary of the 
               signing of the peace accords in Guatemala.

Whereas on December 29, 1996, the Government of Guatemala and the 
        representatives of the Unidad Revolucionaria Nacional Guatemala signed 
        an historic peace accord ending 36 years of armed confrontation;
Whereas the peace accords include the creation of a commission to implement a 
        wide range of reforms to the political, economic, social, and judicial 
        systems of Guatemala, including an enhanced respect for human rights and 
        the rule of law, improved health and education services, attention to 
        the needs of refugees and displaced persons, and the role of the 
        military in a democratic society;
Whereas the peace accords represented the completion of a long and important 
        negotiation process with the goal of achieving lasting peace, national 
        reconciliation, political stability, and renewed economic growth in 
        Guatemala; and
Whereas lasting peace, political stability, and economic development in 
        Guatemala is in the best interest of all nations of the Western 
        Hemisphere, including the United States: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) congratulates the Guatemalan Government of President 
        Alvaro Arzu, the Unidad Revolucionaria Nacional Guatemala, and 
        all other parties to the peace accords on the occasion of the 
        second anniversary of the peace accords;
            (2) commends all of the people of Guatemala for their 
        determination to achieve a lasting peace and encourages their 
        continued strong commitment to democratic principles and social 
        justice for all;
            (3) calls on the Government of Guatemala and all political 
        parties to continue to support the peace accords and to 
        implement the provisions of the accords with respect to 
        providing sufficient budgets for health, education, and 
        security; improving the judicial system; protecting human 
        rights, and strengthening civilian control of the military; and
            (4) affirms the commitment of the United States to continue 
        to support a sustainable peace and development of strong 
        democratic institutions in Guatemala.
                                 <all>
```
### §12602. Members of Army National Guard of United States and Air National Guard of United States: credit for service as members of National Guard

(a) For the purposes of laws providing benefits for members of the Army National Guard of the United States and their dependents and beneficiaries—

(1) military training, duty, or other service performed by a member of the Army National Guard of the United States in his status as a member of the Army National Guard for which he is entitled to pay from the United States shall be considered military training, duty, or other service, as the case may be, in Federal service as a Reserve of the Army;

(2) full-time National Guard duty performed by a member of the Army National Guard of the United States shall be considered active duty in Federal service as a Reserve of the Army; and

(3) inactive-duty training performed by a member of the Army National Guard of the United States in his status as a member of the Army National Guard, in accordance with regulations prescribed under section 502 of title 32 or other express provision of law, shall be considered inactive-duty training in Federal service as a Reserve of the Army.

(b) For the purposes of laws providing benefits for members of the Air National Guard of the United States and their dependents and beneficiaries—

(1) military training, duty, or other service performed by a member of the Air National Guard of the United States in his status as a member of the Air National Guard for which he is entitled to pay from the United States shall be considered military training, duty, or other service, as the case may be, in Federal service as a Reserve of the Air Force;

(2) full-time National Guard duty performed by a member of the Air National Guard of the United States shall be considered active duty in Federal service as a Reserve of the Air Force; and

(3) inactive-duty training performed by a member of the Air National Guard of the United States in his status as a member of the Air National Guard, in accordance with regulations prescribed under section 502 of title 32 or other express provision of law, shall be considered inactive-duty training in Federal service as a Reserve of the Air Force.

(Added Pub. L. 103–337, div. A, title XVI, §1662(g)(1), Oct. 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 2995.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

Provisions similar to those in this section were contained in sections 3686 and 8686 of this title, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 103–337, §1662(g)(2).

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Dec. 1, 1994, except as otherwise provided, see section 1691 of Pub. L. 103–337, set out as a note under section 10001 of this title.