alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 168 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 168

Recognizing the Foreign Service of the United States on the occasion of 
                         its 75th anniversary.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 12, 1999

 Mr. Gilman (for himself, Mr. Gejdenson, and Mr. Smith of New Jersey) 
submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee 
                       on International Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Recognizing the Foreign Service of the United States on the occasion of 
                         its 75th anniversary.

Whereas the modern Foreign Service of the United States was established 75 years 
        ago on May 24, 1924, with the enactment of the Rogers Act, Public Law 
        135 of the 68th Congress;
Whereas today some 10,300 men and women serve in the Foreign Service at home and 
        abroad;
Whereas the diplomatic, consular, communications, trade, development, 
        administrative, security, and other functions the men and women of the 
        Foreign Service of the United States perform are crucial to the United 
        States national interest;
Whereas the men and women of the Foreign Service of the United States, as well 
        as their families, are constantly exposed to danger, even in times of 
        peace, and many have died in the service of their country; and
Whereas it is appropriate to recognize the dedication of the men and women of 
        the Foreign Service of the United States and, in particular, to honor 
        those who made the ultimate sacrifice while protecting the interests of 
        the United States: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) recognizes the Foreign Service of the United States and 
        its achievements and contributions of the past 75 years;
            (2) honors those members of the Foreign Service of the 
        United States who have given their lives in the line of duty; 
        and
            (3) commends the generations of men and women who have 
        served or are presently serving in the Foreign Service for 
        their vital service to the Nation.
    Sec. 2. The Clerk of the House of Representatives shall transmit a 
copy of this resolution to the President of the United States.
                                 <all>
```
### §3308. Protests

(a) Protest File.—

(1) Establishment and access.—If, in the case of a solicitation for a contract issued by, or an award or proposed award of a contract by, the head of an agency, a protest is filed pursuant to the procedures in subchapter V of chapter 35 of title 31 and an actual or prospective offeror so requests, a file of the protest shall be established by the procuring activity and reasonable access shall be provided to actual or prospective offerors.

(2) Redacted information.—Information exempt from disclosure under section 552 of title 5 may be redacted in a file established pursuant to paragraph (1) unless an applicable protective order provides otherwise.

(b) Agency Actions on Protests.—If, in connection with a protest, the head of an agency determines that a solicitation, proposed award, or award does not comply with the requirements of law or regulation, the head of the agency—

(1) may take any action set out in subparagraphs (A) through (F) of subsection (b)(1) of section 3554 of title 31; and

(2) may pay costs described in paragraph (1) of section 3554(c) of title 31 within the limits referred to in paragraph (2) of such section.

(Added and amended Pub. L. 116–283, div. A, title XVIII, §1816(d), (e), Jan. 1, 2021, 134 Stat. 4185.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

The text of subsec. (e) of section 2305 of this title, which was transferred to this section, redesignated as subsec. (a), and amended by Pub. L. 116–283, §1816(e), was based on Pub. L. 103–355, title I, §1015, Oct. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 3256; Pub. L. 104–106, div. E, title LVI, §5601(a), Feb. 10, 1996, 110 Stat. 699; Pub. L. 104–201, div. A, title X, §1074(b)(4)(A), Sept. 23, 1996, 110 Stat. 2660.

The text of subsec. (f) of section 2305 of this title, which was transferred to this section, redesignated as subsec. (b), and amended by Pub. L. 116–283, §1816(e)(1), was based on Pub. L. 103–355, title I, §1016, Oct. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 3257.

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 3308, act Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 192, related to effect of removal from recommended list by President of name of any promotion-list officer or brigadier general of Regular Army who in President's opinion is not qualified for promotion or who is not confirmed by Senate, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 96–513, title II, §204, title VII, §701, Dec. 12, 1980, 94 Stat. 2880, 2955, effective Sept. 15, 1981. See section 629 of this title.

#### Amendments

2021—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 116–283, §1816(e), redesignated subsec. (e) of section 2305 of this title as subsec. (a) of this section and, in pars. (1) and (2), inserted headings and realigned margins.

Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 116–283, §1816(e)(1), redesignated subsec. (f) of section 2305 of this title as subsec. (b) of this section.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section and amendment by Pub. L. 116–283 effective Jan. 1, 2022, with additional provisions for delayed implementation and applicability of existing law, see section 1801(d) of Pub. L. 116–283, set out as an Effective Date of 2021 Amendment note preceding section 3001 of this title.
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         1061134
<NAME>                        ICON Income Fund Eight A L.P.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                             2,000
<SECURITIES>                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                          0
<ALLOWANCES>                                           0
<INVENTORY>                                            0
<CURRENT-ASSETS> *                                     0
<PP&E>                                                 0
<DEPRECIATION>                                         0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     2,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES> **                               0
<BONDS>                                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<COMMON>                                               0
<OTHER-SE>                                         2,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       2,000
<SALES>                                                0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                       0
<CGS>                                                  0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                          0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                     0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                        0
<INCOME-TAX>                                           0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                    0
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                           0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          0
<FN>
*    The  Partnership  has  an  unclassified  balance  sheet  in  its  financial
     statements due to the nature of its industry.  A value of "0" was used for
     current assets and liabilities.

**   The  Partnership  has  an  unclassified  balance  sheet  in  its  financial
     statements due to the nature of its industry.  A value of "0" was used for
     current assets and liabilities.
</FN>

        


</TABLE>
§ 11.1210 Duration and renewal of a regular protection order. An order of protection granted by the court: ( a ) Is effective for a fixed period of time, which is up to a maximum of 6 months; and
( b ) May be extended for good cause upon motion of the petitioner for an additional period of up to 6 months each time a petition is presented. A petitioner may request as many extensions as necessary provided that the court determines that good cause exists.
# C_2016289EN.01007701.xml

| 9.8.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 289/77 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.8.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 289/77

---

P8_TA(2014)0054

Protocol on Matters specific to Railway Rolling Stock ***

European Parliament legislative resolution of 25 November 2014 on the draft Council decision on the approval, on behalf of the European Union, of the Protocol to the Convention on International Interests in Mobile Equipment on Matters specific to Railway Rolling Stock, adopted in Luxembourg on 23 February 2007 (15113/2013 — C8-0004/2014 — 2013/0184(NLE))

(Consent)

(2016/C 289/13)

The European Parliament,

The European Parliament

| — | having regard to the draft Council decision (15113/2013), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the draft Council decision (15113/2013),

| — | having regard to the Protocol to the Convention on International Interests in Mobile Equipment on Matters specific to Railway Rolling Stock, adopted in Luxembourg on 23 February 2007 (1), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the Protocol to the Convention on International Interests in Mobile Equipment on Matters specific to Railway Rolling Stock, adopted in Luxembourg on 23 February 2007 (1),

1

| — | having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Article 81(2) and Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (a)(v), of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C8-0004/2014), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Article 81(2) and Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (a)(v), of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C8-0004/2014),

| — | having regard to Rule 99(1), first and third subparagraphs, Rule 99(2), and Rule 108(7) of its Rules of Procedure, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Rule 99(1), first and third subparagraphs, Rule 99(2), and Rule 108(7) of its Rules of Procedure,

| — | having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on Legal Affairs (A8-0030/2014), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on Legal Affairs (A8-0030/2014),

| 1. | Gives its consent to the approval of the Protocol; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Gives its consent to the approval of the Protocol;

| 2. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States.

---

(1)  OJ L 331, 16.12.2009, p. 5.

1

---
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

LUCANO NUNEZ-CORREA,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 10-10377

D.C. No. 4:10-cr-00383-DCB

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Arizona

David C. Bury, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 19, 2011** 

Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and McKEOWN, Circuit Judges. 

Lucano Nunez-Correa appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and the 51-

month sentence for illegal re-entry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. 

§ 1326. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Nunez-Correa’s

counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion

FILED

DEC 21 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 10-10377

to withdraw as counsel of record. Nunez-Correa filed a pro se supplemental brief,

contending that the district court erred in applying a 16-level crime of violence

enhancement under U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(1)(A)(ii). The government has filed an

answering brief. 

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S.

75, 80-81 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal. We

dismiss in light of the valid appeal waiver. See United States v. Nguyen, 235 F.3d

1179, 1182 (9th Cir. 2000). 

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED. 

DISMISSED.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

# U.S. Department of Defense and Japan Ministry of Defense Joint Statement on Cooperation for Japan’s Next Fighter Aircraft

By IMMEDIATE RELEASE :U.S. Department of Defense

The United States supports Japan’s security and defense cooperation with likeminded allies and partners, including with the United Kingdom and Italy – two close partners of both of our countries – on the development of its next fighter aircraft.The United States and Japan are bolstering our defense cooperation in a number of promising areas, particularly in advancing opportunities for joint research, development, testing, and evaluation. Together, we have begun important collaboration through a series of discussions on autonomous systems capabilities, which could complement Japan’s next fighter program among other platforms. In this context, both sides have concurred to start concrete cooperation within the next year. Such efforts between the United States and Japan greatly strengthen the U.S.-Japan Alliance and build on our cooperation with likeminded partners, further enabling joint responses to future threats in the Indo-Pacific region and beyond.

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More
# C_2013031EN.01001101.xml

| 2.2.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 31/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.2.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 31/11

---

Commission communication pursuant to Article 17(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community

Invitation to tender in respect of the operation of scheduled air services in accordance with public service obligations

(Text with EEA relevance)

2013/C 31/09

| Member State | Italy |
| --- | --- |
| Concerned routes | Bolzano–Rome Fiumicino and vice versa |
| Period of validity of the contract | From 30 June 2013 to 29 June 2016, extendable to 29 December 2016 |
| Deadline for submission of tenders | Two months following the date of publication of this notice |
| Address where the text of the invitation to tender and any relevant information and/or documentation related to the public tender and the public service obligations can be obtained | For further information, please contact:





  Ente nazionale per l'aviazione civile (ENAC) |
| Direzione sviluppo trasporto aereo |
| Viale Castro Pretorio 118 |
| 00185 Roma RM |
| ITALIA |
| Tel. +39 0644596564 |
| Fax +39 0644596591 |
| E-mail: osp@enac.gov.it |
| Internet: http://www.mit.gov.it |
| (http://www.mit.gov.it/mit/site.php?c=normativa&o=vd&id=1566&ic_cat=&id_dett=0) |
| http://www.enac.gov.it |

Member State

Italy

Concerned routes

Bolzano–Rome Fiumicino and vice versa

Period of validity of the contract

From 30 June 2013 to 29 June 2016, extendable to 29 December 2016

Deadline for submission of tenders

Two months following the date of publication of this notice

Address where the text of the invitation to tender and any relevant information and/or documentation related to the public tender and the public service obligations can be obtained

For further information, please contact:

Ente nazionale per l'aviazione civile (ENAC)

Direzione sviluppo trasporto aereo

Viale Castro Pretorio 118

00185 Roma RM

ITALIA

Tel. +39 0644596564

Fax +39 0644596591

E-mail: osp@enac.gov.it

Internet: http://www.mit.gov.it

(http://www.mit.gov.it/mit/site.php?c=normativa&o=vd&id=1566&ic_cat=&id_dett=0)

http://www.enac.gov.it

---
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Cosine Communications, Inc.
(the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2003 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Stephen Goggiano, Director, President and Chief Executive Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my
knowledge:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                        
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.

/s/ Stephen Goggiano

Stephen Goggiano
Director, President and Chief Executive Officer
August 13, 2003

PAGE 35 OF 36
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Peregrine Industries, Inc. (the“Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended December 31, 2004 (the“Report”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof, I, Richard Rubin, CEO and Chairman of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

/s/ Richard Rubin

Richard Rubin CEO and ChairmanDated: April 11, 2005

A signed original of this writtenstatement required by Section 906 has been provided to Peregrine Industries, Inc. and willbe retained by Peregrine Industries, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-94,198-01

EX PARTE BOBBY RAY SEWELL, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. D-16-1492-CR-W1 IN THE 358TH DISTRICT COURT

FROM ECTOR COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R

Applicant was convicted of one count of forgery of a financial instrument and one count of

tampering with a governmental record, and was sentenced to two years’ state jail probated for five

years for the forgery count, and four years’ imprisonment for the tampering with a governmental

record count. The Eleventh Court of Appeals affirmed his conviction. Sewell v. State, No. 11-19-

00342-CR (Tex. App. — Eastland October 7, 2021) (not designated for publication). Applicant filed

this application for a writ of habeas corpus in the county of conviction, and the district clerk

forwarded it to this Court. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07.

Because it does not appear that Applicant’s probation for the forgerycount has been revoked,

this Court lacks Article 11.07 habeas jurisdiction to address any claims as to that count. 
2

Applicant contends that he has newly-available evidence of actual innocence, and that the

State unknowingly presented false testimony at trial. Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might

entitle him to relief. Ex parte Chabot, 300 S.W.3d 768 (Tex. Crim. App. 2009). Accordingly, the

record should be developed. The trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. TEX.CODE

CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d). The trial court may use any means set out in Article 11.07, § 3(d). 

If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. If

Applicant is indigent and wants to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint counsel

to represent him at the hearing. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 26.04. If counsel is appointed or

retained, the trial court shall immediately notify this Court of counsel’s name.

The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law as to whether the State

unknowingly presented false testimony at trial, and if so, whether it is more likely than not that such

false testimony contributed to Applicant’s conviction and punishment. The trial court shall make

findings as to whether Applicant has established that no reasonable juror would have convicted

Applicant of the offenses but for the allegedly false testimony. The trial court may make any other

findings and conclusions that it deems appropriate in response to Applicant’s claims.

The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law within ninety days from

the date of this order. The district clerk shall then immediately forward to this Court the trial court’s

findings and conclusions and the record developed on remand, including, among other things,

affidavits, motions, objections, proposed findings and conclusions, orders, and transcripts from

hearings and depositions. See TEX.R.APP. P. 73.4(b)(4). Any extensions of time must be requested

by the trial court and obtained from this Court.
3

Filed: November 2, 2022

Do not publish