alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §2607. Acceptance of gifts for the Defense Intelligence College

(a) The Secretary of Defense may accept, hold, administer, and use any gift (including any gift of an interest in real property) made for the purpose of aiding and facilitating the work of the Defense Intelligence College and may pay all necessary expenses in connection with the acceptance of such a gift.

(b) Money, and proceeds from the sale of property, received as a gift under subsection (a) shall be deposited in the Treasury and shall be available for disbursement upon the order of the Secretary of Defense to the extent provided in annual appropriation Acts.

(c) Subsection (c) of section 2601 of this title applies to property that is accepted under subsection (a) in the same manner that such subsection applies to property that is accepted under subsection (a) of that section.

(d) In this section, the term "gift" includes a bequest of personal property or a devise of real property.

(Added Pub. L. 101–193, title V, §502(a), Nov. 30, 1989, 103 Stat. 1708.)
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# CARAT/MAREX Singapore Concludes, Strengthening Maritime Cooperation

By Lt.j.g. Mohammad IssaDestroyer Squadron 7 Public Affairs

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More
# **Exhibit 32.1**

 

**Certificate pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to**

**Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of GB&T Bancshares, Inc.(the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2005,as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, Richard A. Hunt, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, to thebest of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.                                       TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.                                       Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ Richard A. Hunt                       |   |
|-------------------------------------------|--------|
| Richard A. Hunt,  Chief Executive Officer |
|                                      |
|                                      |
| November 9,  2005                    |

 

1

----
§ 166.227 How can Indian land be removed from an existing permit? ( a ) We will remove Indian land from the permit if: ( 1 ) The trust status of the Indian land terminates;
( 2 ) The Indian landowners request removal of their interest, with the written approval of the majority interest of the fractionated tract to be removed, and we determine that the removal is beneficial to such interests;
( 3 ) A tribe allocates grazing privileges for Indian land covered by your permit under § 166.218 of this part;
( 4 ) The permittee requests removal of the Indian land, the owners of the majority interest of the Indian land provides written approval of the removal of the Indian land, and we determine that the removal is warranted; or
( 5 ) We determine that removal of the Indian land is appropriate, with the written approval of the owners of the majority interest of the Indian land.
( b ) We will revise the grazing capacity to reflect the removal of Indian land and show it on the permit.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

                    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 1841*et seq*.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR part 225), and all other applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, including the companies listed below.                

The applications listed below, as well as other related filings required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The application also will be available for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States.

Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors not later than February 7, 2011.

A. Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas (E. Ann Worthy, Vice President)2200 North Pearl Street, Dallas, Texas 75201-2272:

*1. Sulphur Springs Bancshares, Inc., Sulphur Springs, Texas,*                     to acquire by merger 100 percent of First Mineola, Inc., and indirectly acquire The First National Bank of Mineola, both of Mineola, Texas.                

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, January 6, 2011.

Robert deV. Frierson,

Deputy Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 2011-341 Filed 1-10-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 
  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of General Metals
Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended January 31, 2008
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Stephen Parent, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my
knowledge:

(1)         
 the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)          
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Dated: March 12, 2008.



/s/ Stephen
Parent
Stephen Parent President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal
Executive Officer)

---
Opinion issued November 13, 2018

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-18-00994-CR

———————————

IN RE SYLVESTER GERALD MCGEE, Relator

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator, Sylvester Gerald McGee, incarcerated and proceeding pro se, has 

filed a petition for writ of mandamus seeking to compel the respondents, the district 

clerk, the district attorney, and the district judge, to respond to his pending 

application for a felony post-conviction writ of habeas corpus.1 However, this 

Court’s mandamus jurisdiction is limited to: (1) issuance of writs of mandamus 

 

1 The underlying case is Sylvester Gerald McGee v. The State of Texas, Cause No. 

0762526-D, pending in the 177th Judicial District Court of Harris County, Texas, 

the Honorable Robert Johnson presiding.
2

against a district court judge, statutory county judge, statutory probate county judge, 

county court judge, district court judge acting as a magistrate at a court of inquiry 

under Chapter 52 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, or an associate judge 

appointed under Chapter 201 of the Texas Family Code, in this Court’s district, and 

(2) issuance of writs of mandamus necessary to enforce our appellate jurisdiction. 

See TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 22.221(a)–(b) (West 2004 & Supp. 2017). To the 

extent that relator’s petition is directed at the district clerk or district attorney, we 

lack jurisdiction because they are not judges and relator does not show that the relief 

he requests is necessary to enforce our appellate jurisdiction. See id.

To the extent that relator’s petition is directed at the district judge, because it 

involves a final post-conviction felony proceeding, we lack jurisdiction because the 

Texas Court of Criminal Appeals has exclusive jurisdiction over Article 11.07 postconviction felony habeas applications. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 11.07, 

§§ 3(a), 5 (West 2015); Padieu v. Court of Appeals of Tex., Fifth Dist., 392 S.W.3d 

115, 117 (Tex. Crim. App. 2013) (orig. proceeding) (per curiam).

Accordingly, relator’s petition is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Higley, Lloyd, and Caughey.

Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
Exhibit 35.1



LOGO

ANNUAL STATEMENT AS TO COMPLIANCE

OFFICERS CERTIFICATE



|RE: | CCRE Commercial Mortgage Securities, L.P.,
|--- | ------------------------------------------

Commercial Mortgage Pass Through Certificates

Series 2011-C2

Terms capitalized but not
defined shall have the meanings assigned in the related Pooling and Servicing Agreement.

In connection with the above referenced transaction, the
undersigned officer, on behalf of Bank of America, N.A., hereby certifies that (i) a review of the activities undertaken during the year ending December 31, 2013 (the Reporting Period), and of the performance under the related
Pooling and Servicing Agreement has been made under my supervision, and (ii) to the best of my knowledge, based on such review, Bank of America, N.A. has fulfilled all of its obligations under the related Pooling and Servicing Agreement in all
material respects throughout the Reporting Period.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, I note that Bank of America, N.A. is no longer a servicer for the
referenced transaction, having transferred the servicing rights for such transaction to Key Bank on June 24, 2013 (the Transfer Date). The certification above is limited to the activities and performance of Bank of America,
N.A. prior to the Transfer Date.



BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.By:

/s/ Robert H. CoxRobert H. Cox,Director
EXHIBIT 32.1

Statement of Chief Executive Officer under 18 U.S.C. § 1350

I, Mark E. Palomba, the chief executive officer of Critical Path, Inc. (the
Company), certify for the purposes of section 1350 of chapter 63 of title 18 of the United States Code that, to the best of my knowledge,



| | (i) | the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2007 (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | ---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                   
|-------------------
|                   
|/s/ Mark E. Palomba
|Mark E. Palomba    

November 14, 2007

A signed original of this written statement required by 18 U.S.C. § 1350 has been provided to Critical Path, Inc. and will be retained by CriticalPath, Inc. and furnished to the United States Securities Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
§ 11.311 Subpoenas. ( a ) Upon request of any party, the court shall issue subpoenas to compel the testimony of witnesses, or the production of books, records, documents or any other physical evidence relevant to the determination of the case and not an undue burden on the person possessing the evidence. The clerk of the court may act on behalf of the court and issue subpoenas which have been signed either by the clerk of the court or by a magistrate of the Court of Indian Offenses and which are to be served within Indian country over which the Court of Indian Offenses has jurisdiction.
( b ) A subpoena shall bear the signature of the chief magistrate of the Court of Indian Offenses, and it shall state the name of the court, the name of the person or description of the physical evidence to be subpoenaed, the title of the proceeding, and the time and place where the witness is to appear or the evidence is to be produced.
( c ) A subpoena may be served at any place but any subpoena to be served outside of the Indian country over which the Court of Indian Offenses has jurisdiction shall be issued personally by a magistrate of the Court of Indian Offenses.
( d ) A subpoena may be served by any law enforcement officer or other person appointed by the court for such purpose. Service of a subpoena shall be made by delivering a copy of it to the person named or by leaving a copy at his or her place of residence or business with any person 18 years of age or older who also resides or works there.
( e ) Proof of service of the subpoena shall be filed with the clerk of the court by noting on the back of the subpoena the date, time and place that it was served and noting the name of the person to whom it was delivered. Proof of service shall be signed by the person who actually served the subpoena.
( f ) In the absence of a justification satisfactory to the court, a person who fails to obey a subpoena may be deemed to be in contempt of court and a bench warrant may be issued for his or her arrest.
IV

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 192

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 1037) to ban the importation

of large capacity ammunition feeding devices, and to extend the ban

on transferring such devices to those that were manufactured before

the ban became law.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 26, 1999

Ms. DEGETTE (for herself, Mr. BLAGOJEVICH, and Ms. CARSON) submitted

the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Rules

RESOLUTION

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 1037) to ban

the importation of large capacity ammunition feeding

devices, and to extend the ban on transferring such devices to those that were manufactured before the ban

became law.

1 Resolved, That immediately upon the adoption of this

2 resolution the House shall resolve itself into the Com3 mittee of the Whole House on the State of the Union for

4 consideration of the bill (H.R. 1037) to ban the importa5 tion of large capacity ammunition feeding devices, and to

6 extend the ban on transferring such devices to those that

7 were manufactured before the ban became law. The first
2

HRES 192 IH

1 reading of the bill shall be dispensed with. All points of

2 order against the bill and against its consideration are

3 waived. General debate shall be confined to the bill and

4 shall not exceed one hour equally divided and controlled

5 by the chairman and ranking minority member of the

6 Committee on Judiciary. After general debate the bill shall

7 be considered for amendment under the five-minute rule

8 for a period not to exceed 10 hours and shall be considered

9 as read. At the conclusion of consideration of the bill for

10 amendment, the Committee shall rise and report the bill

11 to the House with such amendments as may have been

12 adopted. The previous question shall be considered as or13 dered on the bill and amendments thereto to final passage

14 without intervening motion, except one motion to recom15 mit with or without instructions.

Æ
1 From: Boyd.Rochelle@epamail.epa.gov Sent: Saturday, December 10, 2011 5:58 PM To: Palazzolo, Michael A. Cc: Kler.Denis@epamail.epa.gov; Green, David A.; psohi@aluminum.org Subject: Re: FW: SAPU Calculations Attachments: RRR SAPU Calc Clarification.pdf



### Thanks for getting back to me. We will let you know if we need to set up a further discussion on this issue. Thanks

Rochelle Boyd, Environmental Engineer U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards Sector Policies and Programs Division 109 T.W. Alexander Drive, RTP, NC 27711 Mail Drop D243-02 Ph: (919) 541-1390 Fax: (919) 541-3207 Email: boyd.rochelle@epa.gov
### §2200c. Special considerations in awarding scholarships and grants

(a) Centers of Academic Excellence in Cyber Education.—In the selection of a recipient for the award of a scholarship or grant under this chapter, consideration shall be given to whether—

(1) in the case of a scholarship, the institution at which the recipient pursues a degree is a Center of Academic Excellence in Cyber Education; and

(2) in the case of a grant, the recipient is a Center of Academic Excellence in Cyber Education.

(b) Certain Institutions of Higher Education.—In the selection of a recipient for the award of a scholarship or grant under this chapter, consideration shall be given to whether—

(1) in the case of a scholarship, the institution of higher education at which the recipient pursues a degree is an institution described in section 371(a) of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1067q(a)); and

(2) in the case of a grant, the recipient is an institution described in such section.

(Added Pub. L. 106–398, §1 [[div. A], title IX, §922(a)(1)], Oct. 30, 2000, 114 Stat. 1654, 1654A–236; amended Pub. L. 115–91, div. A, title XVI, §1649(d)(1)(E), (F), Dec. 12, 2017, 131 Stat. 1753; Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title XVI, §1633(a), (b)(1), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 2125.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–232 substituted "Special considerations in awarding scholarships and grants" for "Centers of Academic Excellence in Cyber Education" in section catchline, designated existing provisions as subsec. (a), inserted heading, and added subsec. (b).

2017—Pub. L. 115–91 substituted "Cyber" for "Information Assurance" in heading and in pars. (1) and (2).

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

Pub. L. 115–91, div. A, title XVI, §1649(e)(2), Dec. 12, 2017, 131 Stat. 1753, provided that: "Any institution of higher education designated by the Director of the National Security Agency as a Center of Academic Excellence in Information Assurance Education is redesignated as a Center of Academic Excellence in Cyber Education. Any reference in a law (other than this section), map, regulation, document, paper, or other record of the United States to a Center of Academic Excellence in Information Assurance Education shall be deemed to be a reference to a Center of Academic Excellence in Cyber Education."
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                              72
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       15
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 3,882
<PP&E>                                             417
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   4,974
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           10,052
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             4
<OTHER-SE>                                     (5,082)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     4,974
<SALES>                                              6
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     6
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,281
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,274)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,274)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   (430)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,713)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.04)


</TABLE>