alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 13.2



CERTIFICATION OF RICHARD PILLINGER,
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER OF

BLUENRGY GROUP LIMITED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of
BlueNRGY Group Limited (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the period ending June 30, 2015, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned hereby certifies that to the best of his
knowledge:



| | 1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
        13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
        
        2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
        in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: December 9, 2015



|By: | /s/ Richard Pillinger                                       | 
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------- | 
|    | Name: Richard Pillinger                                     | 
|    | Title: Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer) | 



|
|
# **Exhibit 32.1**

 

**Certificate pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to**

**Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of GB&TBancshares, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30,2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), I, Richard A. Hunt, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,certify, to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adoptedpursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.                                       TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.                                       Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

| /s/ Richard A. Hunt                      |   |   |
|------------------------------------------|--------|--------|
| Richard A. Hunt, Chief Executive Officer |

 

 

August 9, 2007

1

----
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

# Secretary of the Navy Discusses Presence and the Global Economy

By Secretary of the Navy Public Affairs

                PHILADELPHIA  –              

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

pacom

news

articles
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Defense Information Systems Agency Joint Spectrum Center Airmen Connect with Multinational Partners during Exercise in Australia

By Master Sgt. Todd KabalanDefense Media Activity – Forward Center Hawaii

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More Articles/News
#### Agnes Hoffman, Appellant, *v.*White Sewing Machine Company, Respondent.

Fourth Department,

January 8, 1908.

Conditional sale — action to recover installments paid — offset by . defendant.

In an action under chapter 762 of the Laws of 1900 to recover the amount paid under a contract of conditional sale of a chattel which had been retaken by the vendor, the latter may offset the expenses of the replevin, but is not entitled to offset rent for the chattel during the time it was held by the plaintiff.

Appeal by the plaintiff, Agnes Hoffman, from a judgment of the Municipal Court of the city of Buffalo in favor of the defendant, rendered on the 26tli day of July, 1907, upon the decision of the court.

*Ernest F. Kruse,*for the appellant.

*Otto W. Volger,*for the respondent.

Williams, J.:

The judgment should be reversed, with costs, and judgment ordered for plaintiff for thirty-eight dollars and costs.

The action ivas brought under chapter 762 of the Laws of 1900 (amdg. Lien Law [Laws of 1897, chap. 418], § 116), to recover the. amount paid by plaintiff upon a sewing machine under a contract for the conditional ■ sale thereof, defendant retaining title. The court sustained plaintiff’s claim, holding the contract was one * covered by the statute and that the plaintff was entitled to recover the money paid by her, forty-eight dollars, and defendant to counterclaim ten dollars, expense of replevin suit to recover the machine from plaintiff. The court further held that, the defendant was entitled to set off. the rental valúe of the machine while it was in the plaintiff’s custody and allowed such rent as an offset so far as to wipe out the plaintiff’s- claim, and then ordered judgment in favor of the defendant for the ten dollars counterclaim besides costs.

There can be no doubt that the contract, though in form a sort of lease-, was in effect a conditional sale of the machine, title to remain in the defendant until the property w.as paid for. The-*167court so found and the evidence justified the finding. , The court further held that the money paid, though referred to in the contract as rent, was recoverable under the statute as money paid on a conditional sale of property, and held the plaintiff was entitled to the same less the ten. dollars expense of the replevin proceeding. See *Roach*v. *Curtis,*115 App. Div. 768.)

So far the court was correct in its conclusions. But it erred in holding that the defendant was entitled to be paid rent for .the machine while plaintiff held it under the conditional sale. In effect this permitted the defendant to retake the machine and also recover the purchase price thereof. This will not do. *(White*v. *Gray's Sons,*96 App. Div. 154; *Edmead*v. *Anderson,*118 id. 16.)

To permit a recovery here would entirely nullify the statute under which this action was brought.

The cases cited by the court as ground for its decision arose prior to the statute in quéstion.

All concurred.

Judgment of Municipal Court of city of Buffalo reversed and new trial ordered in said Municipal Court, with costs to appellant to abide event; new trial to be had on Tuesday, January 28, 19Ó8, at ten o’clock in the forenoon.
### §223a. Ballistic missile defense programs: procurement

(a) Budget Justification Materials.—In the budget justification materials submitted to Congress in support of the Department of Defense budget for any fiscal year (as submitted with the budget of the President under section 1105(a) of title 31), the Secretary of Defense shall specify, for each ballistic missile defense system element for which the Missile Defense Agency is engaged in planning for production and initial fielding, the following information:

(1) The production rate capabilities of the production facilities planned to be used for production of that element.

(2) The potential date of availability of that element for initial fielding.

(3) The estimated date on which the administration of the acquisition of that element is to be transferred from the Director of the Missile Defense Agency to the Secretary of a military department.

(b) Future-Years Defense Program.—The Secretary of Defense shall include in the future-years defense program submitted to Congress each year under section 221 of this title an estimate of the amount necessary for procurement for each ballistic missile defense system element, together with a discussion of the underlying factors and reasoning justifying the estimate.

(c) Performance Criteria.—The Director of the Missile Defense Agency shall include in the performance criteria prescribed for planned development phases of the ballistic missile defense system and its elements a description of the intended effectiveness of each such phase against foreign adversary capabilities.

(Added Pub. L. 108–136, div. A, title II, §223(a)(1), Nov. 24, 2003, 117 Stat. 1420; amended Pub. L. 113–291, div. A, title X, §1060(a)(1), Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3502.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2014—Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 113–291 struck out subsec. (d). Text read as follows: "The Director of Operational Test and Evaluation shall make available for review by the congressional defense committees the developmental and operational test plans established to assess the effectiveness of the ballistic missile defense system and its elements with respect to the performance criteria described in subsection (c)."

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Termination of Reporting Requirements

For termination, effective Dec. 31, 2021, of provisions in subsec. (a) of this section requiring submittal of annual report to Congress, see section 1061 of Pub. L. 114–328, set out as a note under section 111 of this title.

#### Implementation of Requirement for Availability of Test Plans

Pub. L. 108–136, div. A, title II, §223(b), Nov. 24, 2003, 117 Stat. 1420, directed that subsec. (d) of this section was to be implemented not later than Mar. 1, 2004.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Cosine Communications, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2004 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Stephen Goggiano, Director, President and Chief Executive Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of
          the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

/s/ Stephen Goggiano
-----------------------------------------------
Stephen Goggiano
Director, President and Chief Executive Officer
May 13, 2004
#### § 167.12 Grazing fees.

Grazing fees shall not be charged at this time.[1]

###### Footnotes -
  167.12

[1] Grazing Committees were organized in May 1953. These committees have not had ample time to fully acquaint themselves or the stockmen in their respective districts with all of the various items of range administration and range management. Also the drought of several years has not broken. The Navajo Tribe therefore requests that the matter of establishing regulations regarding the adoption of grazing fees be deferred until such a time as a full understanding of the advantages of fees can be had by the majority of the stockmen in all Districts. The assessment of grazing fees will not aid materially in obtaining proper range use. At this time it is more important that other sections of these grazing regulations be adopted and enforced. Resolution of Navajo Tribal Council No. CJ-22-54 of June 9, 1954.
### §2496. Sale of certain goods from the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region prohibited

(a) Prohibition.—The Secretary of Defense may not knowingly permit the sale, at a commissary store or military exchange, of any good, ware, article, or merchandise—

(1) containing any product mined, produced, or manufactured, wholly or in part, by forced labor from the XUAR; or

(2) from an entity that has used labor from within or transferred from XUAR as part of a "poverty alleviation" or "pairing assistance" program.

(b) Definitions.—In this section:

(1) The term "forced labor" means any work or service that is exacted from any person under the menace of any penalty for nonperformance and that the worker does not offer to perform.

(2) The term "XUAR" means the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region of the People's Republic of China.

(Added Pub. L. 117–263, div. A, title VI, §651(a), Dec. 23, 2022, 136 Stat. 2639.)
§ 179.3 What law applies to life estates? ( a ) AIPRA applies to life estates created by operation of law under AIPRA for an individual who died on or after June 20, 2006, owning trust or restricted property.
( b ) In the absence of Federal law or federally approved tribal law to the contrary, State law applies to all other life estates.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 215 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 215

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives with regard to the 
                         return of Saif Ahmed.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 16, 1999

 Mr. Lampson (for himself, Mr. Sandlin, Mr. Pallone, Mr. Diaz-Balart, 
Mr. Becerra, Mr. Ortiz, Mr. Reyes, Mr. Green of Texas, and Mr. Bentsen) 
submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee 
                       on International Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives with regard to the 
                         return of Saif Ahmed.

Whereas the married couple Sayed Ahmed and Melanie Al Mufti had a son, Saif 
        Ahmed, in 1995;
Whereas Melanie Al Mufti and Sayed Ahmed were divorced in February 1998;
Whereas Saif was abducted by his father in 1998;
Whereas Sayed Ahmed later fled the country with Saif and escaped to Egypt;
Whereas the State of Texas granted legal custody of Saif Ahmed to Melanie Al 
        Mufti, and the United States Government has issued an arrest warrant for 
        Sayed Ahmed;
Whereas the Department of State believes Saif now resides in Cairo, Egypt;
Whereas Melanie Al Mufti, even with the assistance of missing children 
        organizations, has been unable to reunite with her son;
Whereas the Department of State, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, and 
        INTERPOL have been unsuccessful in their attempts to bring Saif back to 
        the United States;
Whereas Melanie Al Mufti has not seen her son in almost one year; and
Whereas it will take the continued effort and pressure on the part of Egyptian 
        officials to bring this case to a successful conclusion: Now, therefore, 
        be it
    Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Representatives that 
the governments of the United States and Egypt immediately locate Saif 
Ahmed and deliver him safely to his mother, Melanie Al Mufti.
                                 <all>
```
§ 175.120 What are Operations Manuals? ( a ) We maintain an Operations Manual for each of our utilities. Each utility's Operations Manual is available at the utility.
( b ) The Operations Manual sets forth the requirements for the administration, management, policies, and responsibilities of that utility and its customers.
( c ) We update our Operations Manual for each utility to reflect changing requirements to administer, operate, or maintain that utility.
( d ) When we determine it necessary to revise an Operations Manual, we will: ( 1 ) Provide public notice of the proposed revision;
( 2 ) State the effective date of the proposed revision;
( 3 ) State how and when to submit your comments on our proposed revision;
( 4 ) Provide 30 days from the date of the notice to submit your comments; and
( 5 ) Consider your comments and provide notice of our final decision.
#### § 1000.11 What is the “applicant pool”?

The applicant pool is the pool of Tribes/Consortia that the Director of the Office of Self-Governance has determined are eligible to participate in self-governance.
### §2872a. Utilities and services

(a) Authority To Furnish.—The Secretary concerned may furnish utilities and services referred to in subsection (b) in connection with any military housing acquired or constructed pursuant to the exercise of any authority or combination of authorities under this subchapter if the military housing is located on a military installation.

(b) Covered Utilities and Services.—The utilities and services that may be furnished under subsection (a) are the following:

(1) Electric power.

(2) Steam.

(3) Compressed air.

(4) Water.

(5) Sewage and garbage disposal.

(6) Natural gas.

(7) Pest control.

(8) Snow and ice removal.

(9) Mechanical refrigeration.

(10) Telecommunications service.

(11) Firefighting and fire protection services.

(12) Police protection services.

(13) Street sweeping.

(14) Tree trimming and removal.

(c) Reimbursement.—(1) The Secretary concerned shall be reimbursed for any utilities or services furnished under subsection (a).

(2) The amount of any cash payment received under paragraph (1) as reimbursement for the cost of furnishing utilities or services shall—

(A) in the case of a cost paid using funds appropriated or otherwise made available before October 1, 2014, be credited to the appropriation or working capital account from which the cost of furnishing utilities or services concerned was paid; or

(B) in the case of a cost paid using funds appropriated or otherwise made available on or after October 1, 2014, be credited to the appropriation or working capital account currently available for the purpose of furnishing utilities or services under subsection (a).

(3) Amounts credited under paragraph (2) to an appropriation or account shall be merged with funds in such appropriation or account, and shall be available to the same extent, and subject to the same terms and conditions, as such funds.

(Added Pub. L. 106–398, §1 [div. B, title XXVIII, §2805(a)], Oct. 30, 2000, 114 Stat. 1654, 1654A–414; amended Pub. L. 107–314, div. B, title XXVIII, §2802(a), Dec. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 2703; Pub. L. 113–66, div. B, title XXVIII, §2804, Dec. 26, 2013, 127 Stat. 1007; Pub. L. 116–92, div. B, title XXX, §3032, Dec. 20, 2019, 133 Stat. 1936.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2019—Subsec. (b)(13), (14). Pub. L. 116–92 added pars. (13) and (14).

2013—Subsec. (c)(2), (3). Pub. L. 113–66 substituted "under paragraph (1) as reimbursement for the cost of furnishing utilities or services shall—" for "under paragraph (1) shall be credited to the appropriation or working capital account from which the cost of furnishing the utilities or services concerned was paid.", added subpars. (A) and (B), designated second sentence of par. (2) as par. (3), and substituted "Amounts credited under paragraph (2)" for "Amounts so credited".

2002—Subsec. (b)(11), (12). Pub. L. 107–314 added pars. (11) and (12).
#### § 142.2 What is the purpose of the Alaska Resupply Operation?

The Alaska Resupply Operation provides consolidated purchasing, freight handling and distribution, and necessary transportation services from Seattle, Washington to and from other points in Alaska or en route in support of the Bureau's mission and responsibilities.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsWorkshop on Assurance for Autonomous Systems for AviationThis report describes the workshop on Assurance for Autonomous Systems for Aviation that was held in January 2016 in conjunction with the SciTech 2016 conference held in San Diego, CA. The workshop explored issues related to assurance for autonomous systems and also the idea of trust in these systems. Specifically, we focused on discussing current practices for assurance of autonomy, identifying barriers specific to autonomy as related to assurance as well as operational scenarios demonstrating the need to address the barriers. Furthermore, attention was given to identifying verification techniques that may be applicable to autonomy, as well as discussing new research directions needed to address barriers, thereby involving potential shifts in current practices.Document ID20170000385Acquisition SourceAmes Research CenterDocument TypeConference ProceedingsAuthorsBrat, GuillaumeDavies, Misty*(NASA Ames Research Center Moffett Field, CA United States)*Giannakopoulou, Dimitra*(NASA Ames Research Center Moffett Field, CA United States)*Neogi, Natasha*(NASA Ames Research Center Moffett Field, CA United States)*Date AcquiredJanuary 12, 2017Publication DateMay 1, 2016Subject CategoryCybernetics, Artificial Intelligence And RoboticsAir Transportation And SafetyStatistics And ProbabilityReport/Patent NumberARC-E-DAA-TN32619NASA/TM-2016-219446Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.KeywordsassuranceverificaitonvalidationautonomyAvailable DownloadsNameType20170000385.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024