alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|                                |
|--------------------------------|
|                                |  |
| Media Contact                  | April 30, 2013 |
| Casey Lassiter, 205-410-2777   |   |
| casey.lassiter@healthsouth.com |   |
|                           |   |
| Investor Relations Contact     |   |
| Mary Ann Arico, 205-969-6175   |   |
| maryann.arico@healthsouth.com  |   |

----
### **CHAPTER 767—UTILITIES AND SERVICES**

Sec.
7591.
Utilities: proceeds from overseas operations.
7592.
Radiograms and telegrams: forwarding charges due connecting commercial facilities.
7593.
Quarters: heat and light.
7594.
Furnishing of heraldic services.
7595.
Army Military History Institute: fee for providing historical information to the public.
7596.
Provision of goods and services at Kwajalein Atoll.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**2021**—Pub. L. 116–283, div. A, title XII, §1299A(b), Jan. 1, 2021, 134 Stat. 3998, added item 7596.

**2018**—Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, §808(e)(4), (f)(1), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1839, redesignated chapter 437 of this title as this chapter and items 4591 to 4595 as 7591 to 7595, respectively.

**2000**—Pub. L. 106–398, §1 [[div. A], title X, §1085(a)(2)], Oct. 30, 2000, 114 Stat. 1654, 1654A–288, added item 4595.

**1957**—Pub. L. 85–263, §1(2), Sept. 2, 1957, 71 Stat. 589, added item 4594.
Exhibit 23.2



LOGO

Consent of Chartered Accountants



| |  |  |  |                                                                                                                                       
| |  |  |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |  |  |  | Grant Thornton LLP Suite 401
350 Burnhamthorpe Road W Mississauga, ON
L5B 3J1 T +1 416 366 0100
F +1 905 804 0509 www.GrantThornton.ca

We consent to the inclusion in this Annual Report on Form 40-F of Just Energy Group Inc. (the Company) of
references to our name regarding our involvement in the review of the Companys renewable energy and carbon offset purchases and sales (the Information), which Information is referred to in the Companys Managements
Discussion and Analysis and Annual Information Form incorporated in the Form 40-F for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2013.

We also consent to the
incorporation by reference of the Information into the Companys outstanding registration statements of Form F-3 (No. 333-188184), Form F-10 (No. 333-184289) and Form S-8 (No. 333-183954) that have been filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission.



LOGO

Grant Thornton LLP

Chartered
Accountants

Licensed Public Accountants

September 30,
2013

Audit  Tax  Advisory

Grant Thornton
LLP. A Canadian Member of Grant Thornton International Ltd
#### § 162.521 May a lessee incorporate its WEEL analyses into its WSR lease analyses?

Any analyses a lessee uses to bring a WEEL activity into compliance with applicable laws, ordinances, rules, regulations under § 162.014 and any other legal requirements may be incorporated by reference, as appropriate, into the analyses of a proposed WSR lease.
§ 162.211 What type of valuation or evaluation methods will be applied in estimating the fair annual rental of Indian land? ( a ) To support the Indian landowners in their negotiations, and to assist in our consideration of whether an agricultural lease is in the Indian landowners' best interest, we must determine the fair annual rental of the land prior to our grant or approval of the lease, unless the land may be leased at less than a fair annual rental under § 162.222(b) through (c) of this subpart.
( b ) A fair annual rental may be determined by competitive bidding, appraisal, or any other appropriate valuation method. Where an appraisal or other valuation is needed to determine the fair annual rental, the appraisal or valuation must be prepared in accordance with USPAP.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                           2,666
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    8,983
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                12,682
<PP&E>                                         184,139
<DEPRECIATION>                                (50,426)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 150,416
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          177,486
<BONDS>                                        157,505
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                    (27,071)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   150,416
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 7,566
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    6,037
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  (16)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,016
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    529
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                529
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       529
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00


</TABLE>
Opinion issued November 13, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-14-00757-CR

———————————

EX PARTE WILLIAM DAVIAU, Appellant

On Appeal from the County Criminal Court at Law No. 10

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Case No. 1981593

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, William Daviau, appeals from the denial of his application for 

writ of habeas corpus. In his application for writ of habeas corpus, appellant 

argues that he was wrongfully arrested and remanded to custody for the purpose of 

extradition to the State of North Carolina. Appellant challenges his arrest on the 

grounds that it “is illegal under the double jeopardy statute.” We affirm.
2

“The question of whether or not appellant will be placed in double jeopardy 

is not properly before us and is an issue that has to be determined by the 

demanding state, in this case” North Carolina. Stelbacky v. State, 22 S.W.3d 583, 

587 (Tex. App.—Amarillo 2000, no pet.); see Ex parte Gideon, 493 S.W.2d 156, 

157 (Tex. Crim. App. 1973) (holding that question of double jeopardy is question 

for courts of demanding state and not for courts of asylum state). Because 

appellant’s sole issue in his application for writ of habeas corpus presents a 

question that may not be addressed by the courts of this state, we conclude that the 

trial court did not abuse its discretion by denying his application for writ of habeas 

corpus. See Kniatt v. State, 206 S.W.3d 657, 664 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006).

Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Jennings and Keyes.

Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
EXHIBIT 31.2  RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) CERTIFICATION  I, Robert Dickey IV, certify that:  1.I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Tyme Technologies, Inc.; and2.Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.   Date:  April 29, 2016/s/ Robert Dickey IVRobert Dickey IVVice-President - Finance and Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)
### **CHAPTER 1401—APPLICABILITY AND RESERVE ACTIVE-STATUS LISTS**

Sec.
14001.
Applicability of this part.
14002.
Reserve active-status lists: requirement for each armed force.
14003.
Reserve active-status lists: position of officers on the list.
14004.
Reserve active-status lists: eligibility for Reserve promotion.
14005.
Competitive categories.
14006.
Determination of years in grade.
### **CHAPTER 303—RESEARCH AND ENGINEERING ACTIVITIES**

#### Subchapter I—General

Sec.
4061.
Defense Research and Development Rapid Innovation Program.
4062.
Defense Acquisition Challenge Program.
4063.
[Reserved].
4064.
[Reserved].
4065.
[Reserved].
4066.
Global Research Watch Program.
4067.
Technology protection features activities.

#### Subchapter II—Personnel

4091.
Authorities for certain positions at science and technology reinvention laboratories.
4092.
Personnel management authority to attract experts in science and engineering.
4093.
Science, Mathematics, and Research for Transformation (SMART) Defense Education Program.
4094.
Enhanced pay authority for certain research and technology positions in science and technology reinvention laboratories.

#### Subchapter III—Research and Development Centers and Facilities

4121.
Science and technology reinvention laboratories: authority and designation.
4122.
[Reserved].
4123.
Mechanisms to provide funds for defense laboratories for research and development of technologies for military missions.
4124.
Centers for Science, Technology, and Engineering Partnership.
4125.
Functions of Defense research facilities.
4126.
Use of federally funded research and development centers.
4127.
Defense innovation unit. 1

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior chapter 303 "WEAPON SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT AND RELATED MATTERS", consisting of reserved section 4071, was repealed by Pub. L. 116–283, div. A, title XVIII, §1841(a)(1)(A), Jan. 1, 2021, 134 Stat. 4242.

A prior chapter 303 was renumbered chapter 703 of this title.

#### Amendments

**2023**—Pub. L. 118–31, div. A, title IX, §913(a)(1), title XVIII, §1801(a)(32), Dec. 22, 2023, 137 Stat. 365, 685, struck out identical second item 4094 "Enhanced pay authority for certain research and technology positions in science and technology reinvention laboratories" and added item 4127. Amendments were made pursuant to section 102 of this title.

**2022**—Pub. L. 117–263, div. A, title XI, §1106(b), Dec. 23, 2022, 136 Stat. 2818, added identical second item 4094 "Enhanced pay authority for certain research and technology positions in science and technology reinvention laboratories" after item 4093.

**2021**—Pub. L. 117–81, div. A, title II, §215(b), title XVII, §1701(e)(3)(B), Dec. 27, 2021, 135 Stat. 1593, 2138, added items 4094 "Enhanced pay authority for certain research and technology positions in science and technology reinvention laboratories" and 4121 and struck out former item 4121 "[Reserved]", effective after the amendment made by Pub. L. 116–283, as amended by Pub. L. 117–81, see note below.

Pub. L. 117–81, div. A, title XVII, §1701(u)(3)(A), Dec. 27, 2021, 135 Stat. 2152, amended Pub. L. 116–283, div. A, title XVIII, §1842(a), Jan. 1, 2021, 134 Stat. 4244, which added this analysis, by substituting chapter heading, items for subchapters I to III, and items 4061 to 4067, 4091 to 4093, and 4121 to 4126 for former chapter heading "INNOVATION" and items 4061 to 4066.

1  So in original. Probably should be "Defense Innovation Unit."
# C_2013360EN.01001601.xml

| 10.12.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 360/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.12.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 360/16

---

Notification by the Czech Republic concerning visa reciprocity (1)

1

2013/C 360/11

Ambassador Martin Povejšil

Ambassador Martin Povejšil

Permanent Representative of the Czech Republic to the EU

Permanent Representative of the Czech Republic to the EU

Brussels, 19 November 2013

Ref. No 3494/2013-SZEU/JAV

Dear Director General,

I am pleased to inform you that on 14 November 2013 the Czech Republic was informed by the Government of Canada that as of that date, effective immediately, the Czech nationals will no longer require a visa while travelling to Canada. Based on this announcement, the Czech nationals could enter and stay in Canada for up to six months visa-free.

Herewith the Czech Republic would like to submit a notification in accordance with Article 1, paragraph 4, letter f) of the Council Regulation (EC) No 539/2001 listing the third countries whose nationals must be in possession of visas when crossing the external borders and those whose nationals are exempt from that requirement — please see attached in the annex.

Since the restoration of visa-free regime was always considered as a very sensitive issue for the Czech Republic, I would like to thank you for the support and cooperation in this matter.

[Complimentary close]

Mr Rafael Fernandez PITA

Mr Rafael Fernandez PITA

Director-General

Directorate-General D

General Secretariat of the Council

Brussels

Notification by the Czech Republic

Notification by the Czech Republic

In accordance with Article 1 paragraph 4 point f) of the Council Regulation (EC) No 539/2001 of 15 March 2001 listing the third countries whose nationals must be in possession of visas when crossing the external borders and those whose nationals are exempt from that requirement as amended by the Council Regulation (EC) No 851/2005 of 2 June 2005, the Czech Republic hereby notifies that Canada has abolished the visa requirement for nationals of the Czech Republic with effect as of 14 November 2013.

Since 14 November 2013, nationals of the Czech Republic, holders of the Czech passports, are not required to have a visa to Canada for stays not exceeding six months.

Canada unilaterally introduced the visa requirement for nationals of the Czech Republic, holders of the Czech passports, as of 14 July 2009.

18 November 2013.

---

(1)  This notification is published in conformity with Article 1(4)(f) of Council Regulation (EC) No 539/2001 of 15 March 2001 (OJ L 81, 21.3.2001, p. 2).

1

---
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# AFJROTC Cadets Experience 176th Wing Mission during JBER Visit

By Airman 1st Class J. Michael PeñaJBER Public Affairs

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More
### **CHAPTER 2011—SEPARATION OF OFFICERS FOR SUBSTANDARD PERFORMANCE OF DUTY OR FOR CERTAIN OTHER REASONS**

Sec.
20501.
Authority to establish procedures to consider the separation of officers for substandard performance of duty and for certain other reasons.
20502.
Retention boards.
20503.
Removal of officer: action by Secretary upon recommendation of retention board.
20504.
Rights and procedures.
20505.
Officer considered for removal: voluntary retirement or discharge.
20506.
Officers eligible to serve on retention boards.
EXHIBIT 32.2  HAMMER FIBER OPTICS HOLDINGS CORP.  Certification of the Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  In connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of Hammer Fiber Optics Holdings Corp. (the Company) for the year ended July, 2016 (the Report), I, Michael Cothill, Chairman and Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   March 15, 2017 /s/ Michael CothillPrincipal Financial Officer
#### § 166.600 Must a permittee provide a bond for a permit?

Yes. A permittee, assignee or subpermittee must provide a bond for each permit interest acquired. Upon request by an Indian landowner, we may waive the bond requirement.
Skip Navigation

#         Archive-It      

Login

      - HOME
      - EXPLORE
      - LEARN MORE
      - CONTACT US

### The leading web archiving service for collecting and accessing cultural heritage on the web 

Built at the Internet Archive

        - Explore
        - Federal Depository Library Program Web Archive
        - Commission on Evidence-Based Policymaking

#  Commission on Evidence-Based Policymaking 

**Collected by:** Federal Depository Library Program Web Archive 

**Archived since:**Oct, 2017

**Description:**
The Commission on Evidence-Based Policymaking (CEP) was established to develop a strategy for increasing the availability and use of data in order to build evidence about government programs, while protecting privacy and confidentiality.

**Subject:**    	    Government - US Federal

**Creator:**    	    Commission on Evidence-Based Policymaking

**Collector:**    	    U.S. Government Publishing Office

## Narrow Your Results

### 

            There are no further ways to narrow your results.           

Sites for this collection are listed below. Narrow your results at left, or enter a search query below to		      find a site, specific URL or to search the text of archived webpages.
Clear

              - Sites
              - Search Page Text

Page 1 of 1  (1 Total Results)

**Sort By:**
                - Title (A-Z)
                - Title (Z-A)
                - URL (A-Z)
                - URL (Z-A)

### URL:     https://cep.gov/

	  	Loading Wayback Capture Info...	  

Loading video data...

Page 1 of 1  (1 Total Results)

Archive It

#### Archive-It 

*Built at the Internet Archive*
2014 Archive-ItThe leading web archiving service for collecting and accessing  cultural heritage on the web 

      - Home
      - Learn More         - About Archive-It
        - News/Press
        - Meet the Team
        - Publications
      - Contact Us
### §14514. Discharge or retirement for years of service or after selection for early removal

Each reserve officer of the Army, Navy, Air Force, or Marine Corps who is in an active status and who is required to be removed from an active status or from a reserve active-status list, as the case may be, under section 14507, 14508, 14704, or 14705 of this title (unless the officer is sooner separated or the officer's separation is deferred or the officer is continued in an active status under another provision of law), in accordance with those sections, shall—

(1) be transferred to the Retired Reserve if the officer is qualified for such transfer and does not request (in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary concerned) not to be transferred to the Retired Reserve; or

(2) be discharged from the officer's reserve appointment if the officer is not qualified for transfer to the Retired Reserve or has requested (in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary concerned) not to be so transferred.

(Added Pub. L. 103–337, div. A, title XVI, §1611, Oct. 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 2953; amended Pub. L. 107–107, div. A, title V, §517(c), Dec. 28, 2001, 115 Stat. 1094.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2001—Par. (1). Pub. L. 107–107, §517(c)(1), substituted "if the officer is qualified for such transfer and does not request (in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary concerned) not to be transferred to the Retired Reserve" for ", if the officer is qualified and applies for such transfer".

Par. (2). Pub. L. 107–107, §517(c)(2), added par. (2) and struck out former par. (2) which read as follows: "if the officer is not qualified or does not apply for such transfer, be discharged from the officer's reserve appointment."

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2001 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 107–107 effective on the first day of the first month that begins more than 180 days after Dec. 28, 2001, see section 517(g) of Pub. L. 107–107, set out as a note under section 10154 of this title.

#### Effective Date

Section effective Oct. 1, 1996, see section 1691(b)(1) of Pub. L. 103–337, set out as a note under section 10001 of this title.
July 16, 2015

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

TRYMAINE HOLLINS, Appellant

NO. 14-14-00588-CR

NO. 14-14-00590-CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

________________________________

This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. 

Having considered the record, this Court holds that there was no error in the 

judgment. The Court orders the judgment AFFIRMED.

We further order appellant pay all costs expended in the appeal.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
### §2893. Treatment of incentive fees for landlords of housing units for failure to remedy health or environmental hazards

The Secretary concerned shall not approve the payment of incentive fees otherwise authorized to be paid to a landlord that the Secretary determines has demonstrated a pattern of failing to remedy, or failing to remedy in a timely manner, a health or environmental hazard at a housing unit provided by the landlord.

(Added Pub. L. 116–92, div. B, title XXX, §3021, Dec. 20, 2019, 133 Stat. 1931; amended Pub. L. 116–283, div. B, title XXVIII, §2811(f), Jan. 1, 2021, 134 Stat. 4324.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2021—Pub. L. 116–283 substituted "pattern of" for "propensity for".