alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §1556. Ex parte communications prohibited

(a) In General.—The Secretary of each military department shall ensure that an applicant seeking corrective action by the Army Review Boards Agency, the Department of the Air Force Review Boards Agency, or the Board for Correction of Naval Records, as the case may be, is provided a copy of all correspondence and communications (including summaries of verbal communications) to or from the agency or board, or a member of the staff of the agency or board, with an entity or person outside the agency or board that pertain directly to the applicant's case or have a material effect on the applicant's case.

(b) Exceptions.—Subsection (a) does not apply to the following:

(1) Classified information.

(2) Information the release of which is otherwise prohibited by law or regulation.

(3) Any record previously provided to the applicant or known to be possessed by the applicant.

(4) Any correspondence that is purely administrative in nature.

(5) Any military record that is (or may be) provided to the applicant by the Secretary of the military department or other source.

(Added Pub. L. 105–261, div. A, title V, §543(a)(1), Oct. 17, 1998, 112 Stat. 2020; amended Pub. L. 118–31, div. A, title XVII, §1722(j)(2)(B), Dec. 22, 2023, 137 Stat. 673.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2023—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 118–31 inserted "the Department of" after "the Army Review Boards Agency,".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Pub. L. 105–261, div. A, title V, §543(b), Oct. 17, 1998, 112 Stat. 2021, provided that: "Section 1556 of title 10, United States Code, as added by subsection (a), shall apply with respect to correspondence and communications made 60 days or more after the date of the enactment of this Act [Oct. 17, 1998]."
Statement Pursuant to Section
906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

The undersigned, Richard Rubin, CEO, CFO and
Chairman of Peregrine Industries, Inc, a Florida corporation, hereby makes the following
certification as required by Section 906(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, with
respect to the following of this report filed pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934: Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2013.

The undersigned certifies that the above
quarterly report fully complies with the requirements of Section 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, and information contained in the above report fairly presents, in
all respects, the financial condition of Peregrine Industries, Inc. and results of its
operations.

Date: July 1, 2013/s/ Richard RubinCEO, CFO and Chairman
### **CHAPTER 959—CIVIL AIR PATROL**

Sec.
9491.
Status as federally chartered corporation; purposes.
9492.
Status as volunteer civilian auxiliary of the Air Force.
9493.
Activities performed as federally chartered nonprofit corporation.
9494.
Activities performed as auxiliary of the Air Force.
9495.
Funds appropriated for the Civil Air Patrol.
9496.
Miscellaneous personnel authorities.
9497.
Board of Governors.
9498.
Regulations.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**2018**—Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, §806(d)(2), (e)(1), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1833, redesignated chapter 909 of this title as this chapter and items 9441 to 9448 as 9491 to 9498, respectively.

**2000**—Pub. L. 106–398, §1 [[div. A], title X, §1090(a)], Oct. 30, 2000, 114 Stat. 1654, 1654A–294, amended chapter heading and analysis generally, substituting items 9441 to 9448 for former items 9441 "Status: support by Air Force; employment" and 9442 "Assistance by other agencies".
§ 170.455 What other factors must influence project design? The appropriate design standards must be applied to each construction project consistent with a minimum 20-year design life for highway projects and 75-year design life for highway bridges. The design of TTP projects must take into consideration: ( a ) The existing and planned future use of the facility in a manner that is conducive to safety, durability, and economy of maintenance;
( b ) The particular needs of each locality, and the environmental, scenic, historic, aesthetic, community, and other cultural values and mobility needs in a cost effective manner; and
( c ) Access and accommodation for other modes of transportation.
### §14003. Reserve active-status lists: position of officers on the list

(a) Position on List.—Officers shall be carried on the reserve active-status list of the armed force of which they are members in the order of seniority of the grade in which they are serving in an active status. Officers serving in the same grade shall be carried in the order of their rank in that grade.

(b) Effect on Position Held by Reason of Temporary Appointment or Assignment.—An officer whose position on the reserve active-status list results from service under a temporary appointment or in a grade held by reason of assignment to a position has, when that appointment or assignment ends, the grade and position on that list that the officer would have held if the officer had not received that appointment or assignment.

(Added Pub. L. 103–337, div. A, title XVI, §1611, Oct. 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 2923; amended Pub. L. 104–106, div. A, title XV, §1501(b)(22), Feb. 10, 1996, 110 Stat. 497.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1996—Pub. L. 104–106 inserted "lists" in section catchline.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1996 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 104–106 effective as if included in the Reserve Officer Personnel Management Act, title XVI of Pub. L. 103–337, as enacted on Oct. 5, 1994, see section 1501(f)(3) of Pub. L. 104–106, set out as a note under section 113 of this title.

#### Effective Date

Section effective Oct. 1, 1996, see section 1691(b)(1) of Pub. L. 103–337, set out as a note under section 10001 of this title.
STATE FARM 

INSURANCE ^BUZZ TARVER, Agent 

Auto-Life-Health-Home and Business 

1121 S. Florida Avenue 

Lakeland, FL. 33803 

Phone: (863) 683-5553 www.BuzzTarver.com 

Fax: (863) 687-0271 Toll Free: (888) 683-5553 

E-mail: Buzz@BuzzTarver.com 

Monday, August 02, 2010 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Docket Operations, M-30 

West Building ground floor. 

Room W12-140 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE. 

Washington, DC 20590 

Gentlemen: 

- o 

r~) 

C3 

.R^: FAA-2004-19881 

Exemption No.: 8465B from 14 CFI^ (FAR Section)-91.109(a 

•'.'': i-' ^•••. ;; t •/). • J Cjtt, j 

Please extend this'e^iem^tioh/ ' ' '" •'--^--^ ^^^ • 

JTarver, III 

5155 Lake In the; Wood^ 

Lakeland, FL 33813 

2761396CFI, ' ;•'.' 

Buzz Tarver 

CHARTERED LIFE UNDERWRITER (CLU) 

CHARTERED PROPERTY CASUALTY UNDERWRITER (CPCU) 

STATE FARM AGENT SINCE 1974
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Initial Review Group; Pediatrics Subcommittee.                    

*Date:*                         March 17, 2011.                    

*Time:*                         8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Legacy Hotel and Meeting Center, 1775 Rockville Pike, Rockville, MD 20852.                     

*Contact Person:*                         Rita Anand, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, Division of Scientific  Review, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, NIH, 6100 Executive Blvd., Room 5B01, Bethesda, MD 20892. 301-496-1487.                         *anandr@mail.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.864, Population Research; 93.865, Research for Mothers and Children; 93.929, Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research; 93.209, Contraception and Infertility Loan Repayment Program, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: February 14, 2011.

Jennifer S. Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2011-3776 Filed 2-17-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
#### § 151.18 Severability.

If any provision of this part, or any application of a provision, is stayed or determined to be invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remaining provisions or applications are severable and shall continue in effect.
#### § 1000.173 How does a newly selected Tribe/Consortium initiate the negotiation phase?

(a) To initiate the negotiation phase, an authorized official of the newly selected Tribe/Consortium submits a written request to negotiate an AFA as indicated in the following table:

| For a . . . | the Tribe/Consortium should submit the
request to . . . | and the request should identify . . . |
| --- | --- | --- |
| (1) BIA program | the Director, OSG. | the lead negotiator(s) for the Tribe/Consortium. |
| (2) Non-BIA program | the bureau representative designated to respond to the Tribe's/Consortium's request for information | the lead negotiator(s) for the Tribe/Consortium and the specific program(s) that the Tribe/Consortium seeks to negotiate. |

(b) The Tribal/Consortium official must submit the information required by paragraph (a) of this section by the deadline shown in the following table:

| Type of
program | Type of tribe/consortium | Submission deadline |
| --- | --- | --- |
| (1) BIA | Fiscal year | April 1. |
| (2) BIA | Calendar year | May 1. |
| (3) Non-BIA | Fiscal year or calendar year | May 1*. |

- The request may be submitted later than this date where the bureau and the Tribe/Consortium agree that administration for a partial year funding agreement is feasible.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Trilateral talks enhance cooperation between the Philippines, Japan, and U.S.

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command Public Affairs

                SINGAPORE  –              
Adm. John C. Aquilino, Commander U.S. Indo-Pacific Command, Gen. Andres Centino, Chief of Staff of the Armed Forces of the Philippines (AFP), and General Yoshihide Yoshida, Chief of Staff, Japan Joint Staff (JJS), held the fourth AFP-JJS-USINDOPACOM Trilateral Leaders' Engagement on the margins of the International Institute for Strategic Studies’ 20th Asia Security Summit, also known as the Shangri-La Dialogue.

Organized by Centino and the Philippines, the meeting focused on the leaders’ shared perspective on regional issues and enhanced collaboration on trilateral opportunities while promoting maritime security cooperation.

Aquilino reaffirmed the U.S. commitment to expanding cooperation between the United States and its allies to address regional security issues, deter unlawful maritime activities, and support the use of international law to resolve disputes in the Indo-Pacific region.

The leaders discussed the importance of expanding multilateral activities and the significant potential for enhancing Philippines-Japan-U.S. cooperation.  They also reiterated the importance of increasing defense capabilities and mutual security cooperation to the benefit of all Pacific nations.

This engagement is another demonstration of the strength of our alliances which underpin the security of a free and open Indo-Pacific.

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT
(November 16, 2006)

#### Benjamin Partners, LLC, Appellant, v 583-587 Broadway Condominium, Respondent.

[824 NYS2d 631]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Richard E Braun, J.), entered April 21, 2005, which, to the extent appealed from, denied plaintiff’s motion for partial summary judgment on its cause of action seeking liquidated damages for breach of contract, unanimously modified, on the law, to the extent of granting that portion of the motion which, in essence, sought a declaration that the liquidated damages clause is enforceable, and not an unenforceable penalty, and otherwise affirmed, without costs.

There are questions of fact as to whether plaintiff restricted access to defendant’s building, thereby breaching the agreement and causing delay in performance of the work. Accordingly, Supreme Court properly denied plaintiffs motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability on its first cause of action seeking liquidated damages.

Supreme Court erred, however, in denying that aspect of the motion which, in essence, sought a declaration that the liquidated damages clause is, as a matter of law, enforceable, rather than being an unenforceable penalty. Plaintiff made a prima facie showing both that damages flowing from the alleged breach were, at the time the parties entered into the agreement, difficult to ascertain and that the provision fixing damages is a reasonable measure of the anticipated probable harm (see *Truck Rent-A-Ctr. v Puritan Farms 2nd,*41 NY2d 420, 423-424 [1977]). *312In opposition, defendant failed to demonstrate a triable issue of fact regarding whether the damages flowing from the alleged breach were readily ascertainable at the time the parties entered into the agreement, or as to whether the damages fixed in the agreement are conspicuously disproportionate to the losses sustained *(see Bates Adv. USA, Inc. v 498 Seventh, LLC,*7 NY3d 115, 120 [2006]; *JMD Holding Corp. v Congress Fin. Corp.,*4 NY3d 373, 380 [2005]). Concur—Buckley, EJ., Tom, Friedman, Nardelli and McGuire, JJ.
IV

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 205

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives with regard to Project

Exile and the prosecution of Federal firearms offenses.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 10, 1999

Mr. LEWIS of Kentucky (for himself, Mr. HOSTETTLER, and Mr. SCHAFFER)

submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee

on the Judiciary

RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives with

regard to Project Exile and the prosecution of Federal

firearms offenses.

Whereas Project Exile is a Federal, State and local effort led

by the United States Attorney’s office to prosecute felons

found in the possession of firearms;

Whereas the program, since its establishment in Richmond,

Virginia, in 1997, led to the prosecution of 390 individuals in illegal possession of a firearm during the following

year and a reduction in the city’s homicide rate by onethird;

Whereas Federal prosecution offers the advantage of prompt

indictments, less likelihood of bond, a mandatory min-
2

•HRES 205 IH

imum prison sentence of five years, and fines up to

$250,000;

Whereas donations and contributions have enabled advertisement and publicity of the consequences of possessing illegal firearms;

Whereas Richmond officials have found many in possession of

illegal firearms to be repeat offenders, and the United

States Attorney’s Office has stated Project Exile demonstrates that prosecutors can undertake large-scale efforts against gun crimes, even with limited resources;

Whereas Project Exile has been expanded to additional cities

in Virginia, and funds have been appropriated to implement the project in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, and Camden County, New Jersey;

Whereas no prosecutions have been initiated against anyone

who falsified information to Federal licensees (a Federal

crime punishable by up to 10 years imprisonment), but

more than 40,000 individuals have been prevented from

purchasing firearms since instant checks went into effect

November 30, 1998; and

Whereas the Department of Education reports 6,093 students were expelled for bringing guns to school from

1996 to 1997, but the United States Attorney’s Office

reports only 17 prosecutions under the Safe and Drug

Free Schools Act from 1996 to 1998: Now, therefore, be

it

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives—

2 (1) fully supports Project Exile, as it results in

3 the arrest and punishment of armed criminals
3

•HRES 205 IH

1 through absolute prosecution and imprisonment

2 under existing law; and

3 (2) urges the Department of Justice to pros4 ecute all criminal violations of Federal firearms

5 laws.

Æ
### §2473. Annual five-year plans on improvement of depot infrastructure

(a) Submission.—As part of the annual budget submission of the President under section 1105(a) of title 31, each Secretary of a military department shall submit to the congressional defense committees a plan describing the objectives of that Secretary to improve depot infrastructure during the five fiscal years following the fiscal year for which such budget is submitted.

(b) Elements.—Each plan submitted by a Secretary of a military department under subsection (a) shall include the following:

(1) With respect to the five-year period covered by the plan, an identification of the major lines of effort, milestones, and specific goals of the Secretary over such period relating to the improvement of depot infrastructure and a description of how such goals support the goals outlined in section 359(b)(1)(B) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020 (Public Law 116–92; 133 Stat. 1324; 10 U.S.C. 2476 note).

(2) The estimated costs of necessary depot infrastructure improvements and a description of how such costs would be addressed by the Department of Defense budget request submitted during the same year as the plan and the applicable future-years defense program.

(3) Information regarding the plan of the Secretary to initiate such environmental and engineering studies as may be necessary to carry out planned depot infrastructure improvements.

(4) Detailed information regarding how depot infrastructure improvement projects will be paced and sequenced to ensure continuous operations.

(c) Incorporation of Results-oriented Management Practices.—Each plan under subsection (a) shall incorporate the leading results-oriented management practices identified in the report of the Comptroller General of the United States titled "Actions Needed to Improve Poor Conditions of Facilities and Equipment that Affect Maintenance Timeliness and Efficiency" (GAO–19–242), or any successor report, including—

(1) analytically based goals;

(2) results-oriented metrics;

(3) the identification of required resources, risks, and stakeholders; and

(4) regular reporting on progress to decision makers.

(Added Pub. L. 117–263, div. A, title III, §373, Dec. 23, 2022, 136 Stat. 2540.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Pub. L. 117–263, §373, which directed amendment of this chapter by adding this section after section "2742", was executed by adding this section after section 2472 to reflect the probable intent of Congress.

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 2473, added Pub. L. 104–201, div. A, title VIII, §832(a), Sept. 23, 1996, 110 Stat. 2616; amended Pub. L. 105–261, div. A, title VIII, §809(a)–(d), Oct. 17, 1998, 112 Stat. 2085, 2086; Pub. L. 106–65, div. A, title VIII, §815(b), Oct. 5, 1999, 113 Stat. 712; Pub. L. 111–84, div. A, title VIII, §818(a), Oct. 28, 2009, 123 Stat. 2408, required the Secretary of Defense to place conditions on the procurement of property or services in order to preserve the small arms production industrial base, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 111–383, div. A, title VIII, §822(a), Jan. 7, 2011, 124 Stat. 4268.