alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

 

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of American Laser Healthcare Corporation (the “Company”) for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2013 (the “Report”), I, David Janisch, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 (i)

the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 (ii)

the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

  

/S/ David Janisch

 

David Janisch

 

Chief Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer

 

 

Date:  January 14, 2014
#### § 1000.96 May a Tribe/Consortium continue to negotiate an AFA pending an appeal of residual functions or amounts?

Yes, pending appeal of a residual function or amount, any Tribe/Consortium may continue to negotiate an AFA using the residual information that is being appealed. The residual information will be subject to later adjustment based on the final determination of a Tribe's/Consortium's appeal.
#### § 1000.394 What audit requirements must a self-governance Tribe/Consortium follow?

The Tribe/Consortium must provide to the designated official an annual single organization-wide audit as prescribed by the Single Audit Act of 1984, 31 U.S.C. 7501, *et seq.*
#### § 1000.54 How will a Tribe/Consortium know whether or not it has been selected to receive an advance planning grant?

No later than June 1, the Director will notify the Tribe/Consortium by letter whether it has been selected to receive an advance planning grant.
§ 601.27 Legislative Environmental Impact Statement. ( a ) Consistent with 40 CFR1506.8, the Executive Director shall prepare an EIS for draft legislation initiated by NCPC for submission to Congress. The EIS for the proposed legislation shall be included as part of the formal transmittal of NCPC's legislative proposal to Congress.
( b ) The requirements of this section shall not apply to legislation Congress directs NCPC to prepare.
### §18501. Reserve components: personnel and logistic support by military departments

The Secretary concerned is responsible for providing the personnel, equipment, facilities, and other general logistic support necessary to enable units and Reserves in the Ready Reserve of the reserve components under his jurisdiction to satisfy the training requirements and mobilization readiness requirements for those units and Reserves as recommended by the Secretary concerned and by the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and approved by the Secretary of Defense, and as recommended by the Commandant of the Coast Guard and approved by the Secretary of Homeland Security when the Coast Guard is not operated as a service of the Navy.

(Added Pub. L. 103–337, div. A, title XVI, §1664(c)(1), Oct. 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 3011; amended Pub. L. 107–296, title XVII, §1704(b)(1), Nov. 25, 2002, 116 Stat. 2314.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

Provisions similar to those in this section were contained in section 264(b) of this title, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 103–337, §1661(a)(2)(A).

#### Amendments

2002—Pub. L. 107–296 substituted "of Homeland Security" for "of Transportation".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2002 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 107–296 effective on the date of transfer of the Coast Guard to the Department of Homeland Security, see section 1704(g) of Pub. L. 107–296, set out as a note under section 101 of this title.

#### Effective Date

Section effective Dec. 1, 1994, except as otherwise provided, see section 1691 of Pub. L. 103–337, set out as a note under section 10001 of this title.
#### James William JOSEY, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee. Kenneth Eugene JACKSON, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.

Nos. 6882, 6888.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Argued Oct. 12, 1954.

Decided Oct. 14, 1954.

*182Charles A. Somma, Richmond, Va. (James William Josey, pro se, on the brief), for appellants.

Lafayette Williams, Asst. U. S. Atty,, Yadkinville, N. C. (Edwin M. Stanley, U. S. Atty., Greensboro; N. C., on the brief), for appellee.

Before PARKER, Chief Judge, DOBIE, Circuit Judge, and BOREMAN, District Judge.

PER CURIAM.

 These are appeals from orders denying motions made under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to vacate and set aside sentences of imprisonment imposed upon defendants in March 1951 upon pleas of guilty to an indictment charging armed bank robbery. Both appeals are entirely without merit. Both appellants were represented by counsel and both make attacks upon the attorneys who represented them, but there is no substance in' the attacks. Jackson was represented by an attorney whom he himself employed and Josey by an able and outstanding member of the bar- appointed by the court to represent him. Both admitted their guilt of the crime charged and the record of their hearing shows that their rights were duly protected. Both appellants now claim that they were under eighteen years of age at the time of the commission of the crime and were consequently subject to the provisions of the Juvenile Delinquency Act; but no such question was raised on the hearing .and it affirmatively appears from the evidence taken at that time that they were eighteen years or more of age. They claim that they did not understand that they were pleading guilty to the second count of the indictment which alleged that they put in jeopardy the lives of the officers of the bank by the use of a revolver; but they were represented by counsel who must be presumed to have known the nature of the charges to which the pleas of guilty were entered, and the evidence taken on the hearing shows clearly that - they were guilty of the offense charged in the second count of the indictment as well as that charged in the first count.

Affirmed.
### §1565a. DNA samples maintained for identification of human remains: use for law enforcement purposes

(a) Compliance with Court Order.—(1) Subject to paragraph (2), if a valid order of a Federal court (or military judge) so requires, an element of the Department of Defense that maintains a repository of DNA samples for the purpose of identification of human remains shall make available, for the purpose specified in subsection (b), such DNA samples on such terms and conditions as such court (or military judge) directs.

(2) A DNA sample with respect to an individual shall be provided under paragraph (1) in a manner that does not compromise the ability of the Department of Defense to maintain a sample with respect to that individual for the purpose of identification of human remains.

(b) Covered Purpose.—The purpose referred to in subsection (a) is the purpose of an investigation or prosecution of a felony, or any sexual offense, for which no other source of DNA information is reasonably available.

(c) Definition.—In this section, the term "DNA sample" has the meaning given such term in section 1565(c) of this title.

(Added Pub. L. 107–314, div. A, title X, §1063(a), Dec. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 2653.)
(logo) Rialto CAPITAL

 

 

**2016 Annual Statement ofServicer Compliance (Item 1123)**

 

 

Pooling and ServicingAgreement (the “Pooling and Servicing Agreement”) dated as of February 1, 2012 by and among GS Mortgage Securities Corporation II, asDepositor, KeyCorp Real Estate Capital Markets, Inc. as Master Servicer, RialtoCapital Advisors, LLC as successor Special Servicer to CWCapital AssetManagement LLC,  Wells Fargo Bank, National Association as Trustee andCustodian, TriMont Real Estate Advisors, Inc., as Operating Advisor relating tothe GS Mortgage Securities Trust 2012-GC6, Commercial Mortgage Pass-ThroughCertificates, Series 2012-GC6 **(GSMS 2012-GC6)**

 

               

The undersigned, a dulyauthorized officer of Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, as special servicer (the“Special Servicer”) herein certifies to the following:

 

1.            All servicing activities and performance of such servicing activities under thePooling and Servicing Agreement are performed on behalf of the SpecialServicer.

 

2.            A review of the servicing activities and performance by the Special Servicerfor the period of January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2016 (the “ReportingPeriod”) in accordance with the Pooling and Servicing Agreement has beenconducted under my supervision.

 

3.            To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Special Servicer hasfulfilled all of its obligations under the terms of the Pooling and ServicingAgreement, in all material respects for the Reporting Period and if there hasbeen a failure to fulfill any such obligations in any material respect, eachfailure and the nature and status thereof has been specifically identified herein.

 

 

Certified by: /s/ AdamSinger                                                Date: March 1, 2017

                    Adam Singer, Managing Director
EXHIBIT 32.2  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with the Annual Report of Ameri Metro, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended July 31, 2015 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:  1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.  3. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.  Date: November 16, 2015 By:/s/ Ronald SilbersteinRonald SilbersteinChief Operating Officer
§ 102.110 Self-evaluation. ( a ) The agency shall, by September 6, 1989, evaluate its current policies and practices, and the effects thereof, that do not or may not meet the requirements of this regulation and, to the extent modification of any such policies and practices is required, the agency shall proceed to make the necessary modifications.
( b ) The agency shall provide an opportunity to interested persons, including individuals with handicaps or organizations representing individuals with handicaps, to participate in the self-evaluation process by submitting comments (both oral and written).
( c ) The agency shall, for at least three years following completion of the self-evaluation, maintain on file and make available for public inspection: ( 1 ) A description of areas examined and any problems identified; and
( 2 ) A description of any modifications made.
06-096 DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

Chapter 514: REGULATIONS CONCERNING THE USE OF AQUA TIC PESTICIDES

SUMMARY: This regulation defines the criteria for the use of aquatic pesticides within the State of Maine.

1. Definition. An aquatic pesticide is any substance (including bi ological agents) applied in, on or over the waters of the State or in such a way as to ente r those waters for the purpose of inhibiting the growth or controlling the existence of any plant or animal in those waters.

2. Criteria for Approving a License to Use Aquatic Pesticides

A. Except as provided in 38 M.R.S.A. Section 362-A, n o permit for aquatic pesticide use will be issued for a pesticide which is not registered for the intended use by the United States Environmental Protection Agency and the Maine Depar tment of Agriculture.

B. No permit for aquatic pesticide use will be issued unless the applicant or agent for the applicant is certified and licensed in aquatic pest control b y the Maine Board of Pesticides Control.

C. A permit for aquatic pesticide use will be issued only if the applicant provides adequate protection for non-target species.

D. A permit for aquatic pesticide use will be issued only if the applicant can demonstrate a significant need to control the target species and that pesticide control offers the only reasonable and effective means to achieve control of the targe t species. Demonstration of significant need may include, but not be limited to, health risk, ec onomic hardship, or loss of use.

E. In addition to paragraphs (A) through (D), any dis charge of aquatic pesticides, alone or in combination with allother discharges, shall meet al l other applicable requirements of Maine's waste discharge laws including, but not limited to, the provisions of 38 M.R.S.A. Sections 464

and 465.

AUTHORITY: 38 M.R.S.A. Section 343-A

EFFECTIVE DATE: July 5, 1981

Amended: January 29, 1989

EFFECTIVE DATE (ELECTRONIC CONVERSION): May 4, 1996
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

# Japan's Top Admiral Experiences Aircraft Carrier Operations at Sea

By Mass Communication Specialist Seaman Brian SloanUSS George Washington Public Affairs

                WATERS SOUTH OF JAPAN  –              

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More News/Articles
~ O p l.7 cA O O C

O 

## a c ~ 

### I Q
m fi` i

~ 

### 13 

## m 

## 0 ff

~ N i 

## 9) w O U) O

O



### N O O O



### n

~

~

P-" Ltk CA p

P -.. CA O 0



### .p 

### tn 0 

## 0 %,o 

# H

00

tA tn -1 00 oo °O O lA O t1h p LA O Vk O p Ch C Vi N
----

----

|   | 1.   The      Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of      1934, as amended; and |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2.   The      information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of      the LP. |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: May      15,      2008                                                                                                |   |   |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|
|                                                                                                                        |   |   |
| /s/      Michael A. Reisner                                                                                                 |   |   |
| Michael      A. Reisner                                                                                                     |   |   |
| Co-Chief      Executive Officer and Co-PresidentICON      Capital Corp.General      Partner of ICON Income Fund Eight AL.P. |
#### § 12.51 Must Indian country law enforcement officers follow a code of conduct?

All law enforcement programs receiving Bureau of Indian Affairs funding or commissioning must establish a law enforcement code of conduct which establishes specific guidelines for conduct on and off duty, impartiality, and professional conduct in the performance of duty, and acceptance of gifts or favors. Each officer must acknowledge in writing receiving and understanding of this code of conduct. The acknowledgment will remain on file with the law enforcement program manager as long as the officer is employed there. Training will be conducted on this code of conduct and other ethics issues at least once each year.
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _
Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A 1 8 A2 0 0 0

. HOW A RD HAW KI NS v . GEORGI A DEPARTMENT O F CORRECTI ONS et a l

.

Ho ward Hawk i n s fi l ed t h i s ap p eal fro m th e d i s m i s s al o f h i s s u i t ag ai n s t s ev eral
d efen d an t s , i n cl ud in g t h e Geo rg i a Dep art m en t o f Co rrect i o n s. W h en h e fi l ed h i s
act i on , Hawk i n s was i n carcerat ed

. T h erefo re, u n d er t he Pri s o n Li t i g at i o n Refo rm Act

o f 1 9 9 6 (OCGA § 4 2 -1 2 -1 et s eq .), Hawk in s w as req u ired t o fo l l o w t he d i s cret i o n ary
ap p eal pro ced ures t o ob t ai n ap pel l at e rev i ew o f t h e t ri al co u rt ’ s o rd er d i s m i s s i n g h i s

cas e. See In t h e In t er es t o f K. W

. , 2 3 3 Ga. Ap p

. 1 4 0 (5 0 3 SE2 d 3 9 4 ) (1 9 9 8 ).
Hawk i n s ’ s fai l u re t o co m

p l y wi t h t h e d i s cret i on ary ap p eal req u irem en ts d ep ri v es t h i s Co u rt o f ju ri s d i ct i o n t o co n s id er h i s ap p eal
, wh ich i s h ereb y DISM ISSED.

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia C le r k ’ s O f f i c e , A t la n t a ,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r t i f y t h a t t h e a b o v e i s a t r u e e x t r a c t f r o m

t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d t h e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t
h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. July 16, 2018

07/16/2018
#### Nellie Tanner, an Infant, by Peter Tanner, Her Guardian ad Litem, Respondent, v. Thomas Kells Son’s Company, Appellant.

Judgment and order unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present-—-Woodward, Jenks, Hooker, Gaynor and Miller, JJ.
### §12242. Warrant officers: promotion

The promotion of permanent reserve warrant officers not on the warrant officer active-duty list to permanent reserve warrant officer grades shall be governed by such regulations as the Secretary concerned may prescribe.

(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 26, §598; Pub. L. 102–190, div. A, title XI, §1131(3), Dec. 5, 1991, 105 Stat. 1505; renumbered §12242, Pub. L. 103–337, div. A, title XVI, §1662(d)(2), Oct. 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 2991.)

| Revised section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 598 | 10:600e (last sentence, less applicability to temporary promotions).34:330 (last sentence, less applicability to temporary promotions). | May 29, 1954, ch. 249, §7 (last sentence, less applicability to temporary promotions), 68 Stat. 159. |

34:330 (last sentence, less applicability to temporary promotions).

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1994—Pub. L. 103–337 renumbered section 598 of this title as this section.

1991—Pub. L. 102–190 inserted "not on the warrant officer active-duty list" after "reserve warrant officers".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1991 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 102–190 effective Feb. 1, 1992, see section 1132 of Pub. L. 102–190, set out as a note under section 521 of this title.
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk February 26, 2010

0222 

# Order

February 26, 2010

140183 & (18)

TIMOTHY L. TRAMMEL, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 140183 COA: 292912 WCAC: 2008-000226 CONSUMERS ENERGY COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the motion for le ave to file a brief amicus curiae is GRANTED. The application for leave to ap peal the November 2, 2009 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DE NIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
§ 11.108 How are tribal ordinances affected by this part? The governing body of each tribe occupying the Indian country over which a Court of Indian Offenses has jurisdiction may enact ordinances which, when approved by the Assistant Secretary—Indian Affairs or his or her designee: ( a ) Are enforceable in the Court of Indian Offenses having jurisdiction over the Indian country occupied by that tribe; and
( b ) Supersede any conflicting regulation in this part.
##### 



EXHIBIT 99.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Cosine Communications, Inc.
(the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2003 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Terry Gibson, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my
knowledge:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                        
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.

/s/ Terry Gibson

Terry Gibson
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
May 9, 2003