alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXPERT STATEMENT

ON THE OXIDIZING PROPERTIES

OF TKA 40278 (CGI 827)

Study Director:

Dr. Ute Schmiedel

Stud Com letion Date:

E~ecember 02, 2002

Test Facility:

RCC Ltd

Environmental Chemistry &

Pharmanalytics Division

CH-4452 Itingen/Switzerland

ClBA SPECIALTY CHEMICALS INC,

CH - 4002 Basel/Switzerland

RCC Stud Number:

845428

Page 1 of 3

365
RCC Study Number 845428

TKA 40278 (CGI 827)

EXPERT STATEMENT Page 2

Expert Statement by:

Date oflssue:

Sponsor:

Monitoring Scientist:

Dr. Ute Schmiedel

RCC Ltd

Environmental Chemistry & Pharmanalytics Division

Zelgliweg 1

CH-4452 Itingen/Switzerland

December 02, 2002

CIBA SPECIALTY CHEMICALS INC.

CH-4002 Basel/Switz.erland

Dr. Moung Sook Lee

STATEMENT

The oxidising properties of TKA 40278 (CGI 827) were screened based on the UN

Recommendations on the Transport of Dangerous Goods (Orange Book, 3r~ edition, 1999)

where a set of criteria is compiled to evaluate the need for classification of materials as

oxidising substances. According to the criteria as described in the above mentioned UN

document:

the classification procedure using experimental testing need no_jt be applied for organic

compounds if the compound does not contain oxyqen, .fluorine or chlorine.

Since the molecular formula of TKA 40278 (CGI 827) contains oxygen, therefore the second

criteria of the Orange Book UN Recommendations has to be applied:

the classification procedure using experimental testing need no__jt to be applied for

organic compounds if the compound contains oxygen, fluorine or chlorine and these

elements are chemically bonded only to carbon and hvdro(~en.

This second criteria is fulfilled for TKA 40278 (CGI 827) which is a mixture of 2 isomers of

identical molecular formula. They contain two hydroxy- and two keto-groups each.

CONCLUSION

Applying the internationally recognised UN Recommendation criteria, TKA 40278 (CGI 827)

is found to be non-oxidising and therefore is not to be tested experimentally for the

classification under division 5.1 as oxidising substances. Thus it can be concluded beyond a

reasonable doubt that TKA 40278 (CGI 827) is not capable of causing fire or enhancing the

risk of fire when in contact with combustible material.

366
RCC Study Number 845428 EXPERT STATEMENT Page 3

TKA 40278 (CGI 827)

Mrs. Alessandra Tognucci

RCC Environmental Chemistry & Pharmanalytics Division

Dr. Ute Schmiedel

Date:,

367
Exhibit 15.2



Leena Jaisani

Sr.
Director&Head-
Media&Entertainment
Division







July 21, 2016







Ms J yoti Deshpande
Chief Executive Officer
Eros International Plc
Fort Anne

South Quay

Douglas

Isle of Man IM1 5PD



Re: Consent to use of extracts and reference
to FICCI-KPMG Indian Media and Entertainment Industry Reports by Eros International Pic (the “Company”)



Dear Ms. Deshpande,



Reference is hereby made to the Federation
of Indian Chambers of Commerce and Industry (“FICCI”) KPMG Indian Media and Entertainment Industry Report 2016 (“2016
Report”), the FICCI-KPMG India n Media and Entertainment Industry Report 2015 (“2015 Report”), the FICCI-KPMG
Indian Media and Entertainment Industry Report 2014 (“2014 Report”), the FICCI-KPMG Indian Media and Entertainment
Industry Report 2013 (“2013 Report”), the FICCI-KPMG Indian Media and Entertainment Industry Report 2012 (“2012
Report”), the FICCI-KPMG India n Media and Entertainment Industry Report 2011 (“2011 Report”), the FICCI-KPMG
Indian Media and Entertainment Industry Report 2010 (“2010 Report”) and the FICCI- KPMG Indian Media and Entertainment
Industry Report 2009 (“2009 Report”, and together with 2010 Report, 2011 Report, 2012 Report, 2013 Report, 2014 Report,
2015 Report, and 2016 the “Reports”).



We hereby consent to the inclusion of
our name, the Reports and their contents or extracts of the Reports in any document issued by the Company and/or any of its subsidiaries,
including but not restricted to Form 20-F filed as Annual Report for the Financial Year ended March 31, 2016 pursuant to section
13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and any other documents that ma y be filed, submitted or used in connection
with SEC filings.



We further confirm that we have, where
required, obtained requisite consent in relation to any information used by us in the Reports.



Yours Sincerely,











Industry’s Voice for Policy
Change
Exhibit 32

Via EDGAR

Securities and Exchange Commission

100F Street, N.E.

Washington, D.C. 20549

Re: Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Ladies and Gentlemen:

In connection with the Annual Report of Whiting USA Trust II (the “Trust”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, not in its individual capacity but solely as the trustee of the Trust, certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to its knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.

The above certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-K or as a separate disclosure document.

|  

						 

						  |   |                                                                                     |
|------------------------------------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                               |   | Whiting USA Trust II                                                      |
|                               |   |                                                                                     |
|                               | By:    | The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., |
|                               |   | as Trustee                                                                          |
|                               |   |                                                                                     |
|                               | By:    | /s/ Mike Ulrich                                                                     |
|                               |   | Mike Ulrich                                                                              |
|                               |   | Vice President                                                                      |
|                               |   |                                                                                     |

Date: March 11, 2016

 

 

----
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

# DESRON 15 Assures Surface Warfare Readiness through Revitalized SURFREM Program

By Mass Communication Specialist 1st Class Trevor WelshTask Force 70 Public Affairs

                USS GEORGE WASHINGTON, At Sea  –              

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

pacom

news

articles
§ 162.342 When will a residential lease be effective? ( a ) A residential lease will be effective on the date that we approve the lease, even if an appeal is filed under part 2 of this chapter.
( b ) The lease may specify a date on which the obligations between the parties to a residential lease are triggered. Such date may be before or after the approval date under paragraph (a) of this section.
# C_2013283EN.01004301.xml

| 28.9.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 283/43 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.9.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 283/43

---

Corrigendum to the publication of an amendment application pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 179 of 25 June 2013
  )

Official Journal of the European Union C 179 of 25 June 2013

2013/C 283/09

On page 21, point 3.2, third paragraph:

for:

‘in the fruit and vegetable sector’,

read:

‘in the fruit and vegetable sector (1)

---

(1)  Replaced by Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 of 7 June 2011 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 in respect of the fruit and vegetables and processed fruit and vegetables sectors (OJ L 157, 15.6.2011, p. 1).’

1

---
### §1594. Reimbursement for financial institution charges incurred because of Government error in direct deposit of pay

(a)(1) A civilian officer or employee of the Department of Defense who, in accordance with law or regulation, participates in a program for the automatic deposit of pay to a financial institution may be reimbursed for a covered late-deposit charge.

(2) A covered late-deposit charge for purposes of paragraph (1) is a charge (including an overdraft charge or a minimum balance charge) that is levied by a financial institution and that results from an administrative or mechanical error on the part of the Government that causes the pay of the officer or employee concerned to be deposited late or in an incorrect manner or amount.

(b) Reimbursements under this section shall be made from appropriations available for the pay of the officer or employee concerned.

(c) The Secretaries concerned shall prescribe regulations to carry out this section, including regulations for the manner in which reimbursement under this section is to be made.

(d) In this section:

(1) The term "financial institution" means a bank, savings and loan association, or similar institution or a credit union chartered by the United States or a State.

(2) The term "pay" includes allowances.

(Added Pub. L. 101–189, div. A, title VI, §664(b)(1), Nov. 29, 1989, 103 Stat. 1466; amended Pub. L. 101–510, div. A, title XIV, §1484(k)(6), Nov. 5, 1990, 104 Stat. 1719; Pub. L. 102–25, title VII, §701(e)(8)(A), Apr. 6, 1991, 105 Stat. 115; Pub. L. 105–261, div. A, title V, §564(b), Oct. 17, 1998, 112 Stat. 2029.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1998—Subsec. (d)(1). Pub. L. 105–261 amended par. (1) generally. Prior to amendment, par. (1) read as follows: "The term 'financial institution' has the meaning given the term 'financial organization' in section 3332(a) of title 31."

1991—Pub. L. 102–25 struck out "mandatory" after "error in" in section catchline.

1990—Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 101–510 substituted "In this section" for "in this section".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section applicable with respect to pay and allowances deposited (or scheduled to be deposited) on or after first day of first month beginning after Nov. 29, 1989, see section 664(c) of Pub. L. 101–189, set out as an Effective Date of 1989 Amendment note under section 1053 of this title.
#### § 162.255 Can BIA take emergency action if the leased premises are threatened with immediate and significant harm?

If a tenant or any other party causes or threatens to cause immediate and significant harm to the leased premises during the term of an agricultural lease, we will take appropriate emergency action. Emergency action may include trespass proceedings under part 166, subpart I, of this chapter, or judicial action seeking immediate cessation of the activity resulting in or threatening the harm. Reasonable efforts will be made to notify the Indian landowners, either before or after the emergency action is taken.
### §2200j. Definitions

In this chapter:

(1) The term "program" means the Defense Civilian Training Corps program established under section 2200g.

(2) The term "member of the program" means a student at an accredited civilian educational institution who is enrolled in the program.

(Added Pub. L. 116–92, div. A, title VIII, §860(a), Dec. 20, 2019, 133 Stat. 1514; amended Pub. L. 116–283, div. A, title X, §1081(a)(4)(A), Jan. 1, 2021, 134 Stat. 3870.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2021—Pub. L. 116–283 substituted "§" for "SEC." in section designation.
Exhibit 32.1



Statement of Chief Executive Officer under 18 U.S.C. § 1350



I, Mark J. Ferrer, the chief executive officer of Critical Path, Inc. (the
Company), certify for the purposes of section 1350 of chapter 63 of title 18 of the United States Code that, to the best of my knowledge,



(i)     the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2005 (the Report), fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and



(ii)
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                   |  | 
|------------------ |  | 
|                  
|/s/ Mark J. Ferrer
|Mark J. Ferrer    



May 10, 2005



A signed original of this written statement required by 18 U.S.C. § 1350 has been
provided to Critical Path, Inc. and will be retained by Critical Path, Inc. and furnished to the Securities Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                             983
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   983
<PP&E>                                           3,110
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   4,093
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,891,919
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      8,710
<COMMON>                                        20,284
<OTHER-SE>                                   8,892,826
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     4,093
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,096,894
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              62,770
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (1,096,894)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (1,179,664)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.017)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0



</TABLE>
Problem Solver | Maryland.gov | Online Services | State A gencies | Phone Directory | En Español Maryland Department of Human Resources » Office of Home Energy Pr... http://www.dhr.state.md.us/blog/?p age_id=4326 1 of 3 8/31/2015 9:35 AMMaryland Department of Human Resources » Office of Home Energy Pr... http://www.dhr.state.md.us/blog/?p age_id=4326 2 of 3 8/31/2015 9:35 AMMaryland Department of Human Resources » Office of Home Energy Pr... http://www.dhr.state.md.us/blog/?p age_id=4326 3 of 3 8/31/2015 9:35 AM
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ISIDRO JUAN FRANCISCO,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 11-72651

Agency No. A070-636-716

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted August 14, 2013** 

Before: SCHROEDER, GRABER, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges. 

Isidro Juan Francisco, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions for review

of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an

immigration judge’s decision denying his application for asylum, withholding of

removal, and relief under the Nicaraguan Adjustment and Central American Relief

FILED

AUG 16 2013

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 11-72651

Act (“NACARA”). Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review

for substantial evidence factual findings, Zehatye v. Gonzales, 453 F.3d 1182,

1184-85 (9th Cir. 2006), and we deny in part and dismiss in part the petition for

review.

Substantial evidence supports the BIA’s finding that Juan Francisco failed to

establish past persecution on account of an actual or imputed political opinion. See

INS v. Elias-Zacarias, 502 U.S. 478, 482-83 (1992) (forced recruitment alone does

not suffice to show persecution on account of political opinion). Because Juan

Francisco failed to present his “social group” argument to the BIA, we do not

consider it. See Cordon-Garcia v. INS, 204 F.3d 985, 988 (9th Cir. 2000). Having

failed to establish past persecution, Juan Francisco is not entitled to a presumption

of future persecution. See Molina-Estrada v. INS, 293 F.3d 1089, 1096 (9th Cir.

2002). Juan Francisco does not argue that he otherwise established a well-founded

fear of future persecution. Accordingly, his asylum and withholding of removal

claims fail. See Ochoa v. Gonzales, 406 F.3d 1166, 1172 (9th Cir. 2005).

We lack jurisdiction to review the agency’s determination that Juan

Francisco is not eligible for NACARA relief. See Ixcot v. Holder, 646 F.3d 1202,

1213-14 (9th Cir. 2011). Juan Francisco argues that the BIA found that he credibly

testified regarding completion of an ABC registration form, and that it erred as a
3 11-72651

matter of law by requiring him to prove that the form was properly filed. We reject

this argument because, contrary to his assertion, the BIA did not find that the

document Juan Francisco signed was an ABC registration form.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 141 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 141

 For the relief of Vince Munoz, Governor of the Tribal Council of the 
Ysleta del Sur Pueblo and all other enrolled members of the Ysleta del 
                              Sur Pueblo.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 15, 1999

Mr. Reyes submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 For the relief of Vince Munoz, Governor of the Tribal Council of the 
Ysleta del Sur Pueblo and all other enrolled members of the Ysleta del 
                              Sur Pueblo.

    Resolved, That H.R. ____, entitled ``A bill for the relief of Vince 
Munoz, Governor of the Tribal Council of the Ysleta del Sur Pueblo and 
all other enrolled members of the Ysleta del Sur Pueblo'', now pending 
in the House of Representatives, together with all of the accompanying 
papers, is hereby referred to the Chief Judge of the United States 
Court of Federal Claims and the Chief Judge of the United States Court 
of Federal Claims shall proceed with the same in accordance with the 
provisions of sections 1492 and 2509 of title 28, United States Code.
                                 <all>
```
#### Michael S. Acosta, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Reginald J. Holzer, Defendant-Appellee.

Gen. No. 49,936.

First District, First Division.

July 30,1965.

Anthony Haswell and David Levinson, Jr., of Chicago, for appellants;

L. Louis Karton, of Chicago, for appellee.

Opinion by

JUSTICE MURPHY.

Not to be published in full.
Martin, Michael (OST) From: Sent: To: Subject:
Dear Mr. Martin, "0' , ••• r. Jason Milewski <jmilewski@prautes.com> Monday, May OS,2014 5:00 PM Martin, Michael (05T) c_. c . " , ,,, . ..,, Victoria Regional Airport Community Response to 2014 ~A5'Piop6sals'--\ :,.. 0v

We have received theproposals for commercial air service that you sent us on April 23rd, 2014. Upon extensive review ofeach proposal, our Airport Board and County Commissioner's Court has decided to reject both and request admittance into the Alternate Essential Air Service Program. We arerejecting Boutique Air's proposal for service primarily due to the factthat much ofourtraffic is industrial/plant traffic and their corporate policies do not allow them utilize anything less than atwin-turbine, two-pilot aircraft. Without this necessary business traffic, we find that itwould be difficult to meet EAS requirements toremain eligible for funding. Atthis time, our community isunwilling to waive the twin engine requirement. We arerejecting the proposal from Sun Air due to similar reasons. Our corporate traffic requirements do not allow them to operate on Sun Air's aircraft either. Sun Air isthe incumbent carrier and since Oct of2012,we've experienced agreater than 60% decline inpassenger enplanements from prior years. Ifthis trend continues (or doesn't drastically reverse), our eligibility for future EAS funding remains indirejeopardy. Numerous
. maintenance cancellations (over 350 in 18months) and aircraft baggage limitations are the number one cited

.example from passengers fornot supporting the current carrier. Our community is not willing torisk our future eligibility by operating with this same carrier. Based upon these factors, we are requesting entrance into the Alternate Essential Air Service program whereby we can directly partner with acarrier that has the most suitable equipment, schedule, and destination(s) tomost closely match our communities travel demands. Please do not hesitate to contact me should you have any questions and/or concerns regarding our election tothe Alternate EAS program. Sincerely, Jason Milewski, C.M. Managing Director

---\ 

# ~15~) ~. \I!.!~ -'.: 502 Chimney Rock Dr. Victoria, TX 77904 361.655.0958 720.368.6151 fax

1