alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §1131. Purple Heart: limitation to members of the armed forces

The decoration known as the Purple Heart (authorized to be awarded pursuant to Executive Order 11016) may only be awarded to a person who is a member of the armed forces at the time the person is killed or wounded under circumstances otherwise qualifying that person for award of the Purple Heart.

(Added Pub. L. 105–85, div. A, title V, §571(a)(1), Nov. 18, 1997, 111 Stat. 1756.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Executive Order 11016, referred to in text, is Ex. Ord. No. 11016, Apr. 25, 1962, 27 F.R. 4139, which is set out as a note under section 1129 of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Pub. L. 105–85, div. A, title V, §571(b), Nov. 18, 1997, 111 Stat. 1756, provided that: "Section 1131 of title 10, United States Code, as added by subsection (a), shall apply with respect to persons who are killed or wounded after the end of the 180-day period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act [Nov. 18, 1997]."
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                         242,783
<SECURITIES>                                    32,669
<RECEIVABLES>                                   48,026
<ALLOWANCES>                                     4,115
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               296,382
<PP&E>                                         134,103
<DEPRECIATION>                                  48,399
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,923,642
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           83,439
<BONDS>                                        305,958
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            73
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,553,646
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,923,642
<SALES>                                        103,023
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               103,023
<CGS>                                           52,532
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   65,798
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               370,168
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,169
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              10,747
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (333,997)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,333
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (338,330)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (338,330)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (5.94)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (5.94)


</TABLE>
Exhibit 99.1

**Mid-Wisconsin Financial Services, Inc.**

**Certification of the Principal Executive Officer**

**Pursuant to Section 111(b) EESA**

**Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2011**
IV

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 117

Expressing support for a National Week of Reflection and Tolerance.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 16, 1999

Mr. RANGEL submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on Government Reform

RESOLUTION

Expressing support for a National Week of Reflection and

Tolerance.

Whereas America is a pluralistic country comprised of different races, genders, ethnic groups, religions, and

creeds;

Whereas our Nation, founded on the principles of tolerance,

diversity, justice, and equality, should affirm these common values and principles; and

Whereas Americans should reflect on the importance of understanding and tolerance in our pluralistic country:

Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That a National Week of Reflection and

2 Tolerance should be established encouraging communities

3 and institutions around the Nation to engage in events
2

•HRES 117 IH

1 and activities that are reflective, educational, celebratory,

2 and healing as they relate to diversity among Americans.

Æ
#### § 162.368 Will late payment charges or special fees apply to delinquent payments due under a residential lease?

(a) Late payment charges will apply as specified in the lease. The failure to pay these amounts will be treated as a lease violation.

(b) We may assess the following special fees to cover administrative costs incurred by the United States in the collection of the debt, if rent is not paid in the time and manner required, in addition to late payment charges that must be paid to the Indian landowners under the lease:

| The lessee will pay . . . | For . . . |
| --- | --- |
| (1) $50.00 | Any dishonored check. |
| (2) $15.00 | Processing of each notice or demand letter. |
| (3) 18 percent of balance due | Treasury processing following referral for collection of delinquent debt. |
_____________

No. 96-1094SI

_____________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the Southern

v. * District of Iowa.

*

Robert Clyde Hoskins, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Appellant. *

_____________

Submitted: May 14, 1996

 Filed: May 22, 1996

_____________

Before McMILLIAN, FAGG, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges.

_____________

PER CURIAM.

After committing a series of restaurant robberies, Robert Clyde

Hoskins was charged with conspiring to commit robberies affecting

interstate commerce in violation of the Hobbs Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1951 (1994).

Hoskins entered a conditional plea of guilty to the charge and appealed.

Relying on United States v. Lopez, 115 S. Ct. 1624 (1995), Hoskins contends

the district court improperly denied his motion to dismiss. Hoskins argues

that his actions did not violate the Hobbs Act because the statute was not

meant to encompass the robbery of local businesses. Hoskins's argument,

however, is foreclosed by our recent holding in United States v. Farmer,

73 F.3d 836, 843 (8th Cir. 1996). Likewise, Hoskins's argument that the

superseding indictment fails to allege a violation of the Hobbs Act is

foreclosed by our contrary holding in Farmer, id. at 843-44. We thus

affirm the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
-2-

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
§ 141.41 Refinancing transaction. ( a ) Any pawn agreement may be refinanced, either with or without an increase in the principal amount of the loan, prior to or following the date of expiration of the original period of the loan upon agreement between the parties.
( b ) Such refinancing constitutes a new transaction for purposes of all disclosure and record keeping requirements of this part and requires the issuance of a new ticket or receipt.
( c ) The rate of the additional finance charge imposed as part of the refinancing agreement may not exceed the maximum rate imposed by § 141.36.
( d ) The total finance charges in a refinancing agreement may not exceed the sum of the following amounts: ( 1 ) The finance charge that the pledgor would have been required to pay upon prepayment on the date of refinancing under § 141.37 of this part, except that, for the purpose of computing this amount, no minimum finance charge or administrative fee may be included, and
( 2 ) Such additional finance charge as is permissible on the balance of the loan over the remaining period of the loan as extended.
( e ) The default and sale procedures of this part apply to a refinanced pawn transaction in the same manner as they apply to an original pawn transaction.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from June 30,
1998 financials and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                           6,700
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                             741
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                10,265
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     31,988
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                        123,698
<ALLOWANCE>                                      1,666
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 180,951
<DEPOSITS>                                     161,127
<SHORT-TERM>                                     3,482
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              1,839
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            8,381
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                       6,122
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 180,951
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  6,224
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  864
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   327
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 7,415
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               3,705
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,752
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            3,663
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      252
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  3,002
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,195
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       1,195
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       806
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .48
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .46
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.65
<LOANS-NON>                                         67
<LOANS-PAST>                                       450
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 1,433
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       30
<RECOVERIES>                                        11
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                1,666
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             1,666
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          1,666
        

</TABLE>
IV

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 129

Extending the Select Committee on U.S. National Security and Military/

Commercial Concerns With the People’s Republic of China.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 24, 1999

Mr. COX (for himself and Mr. DICKS) submitted the following resolution;

which was referred to the Committee on Rules

MARCH 24, 1999

The Committee on Rules discharged; considered and agreed to

RESOLUTION

Extending the Select Committee on U.S. National Security

and Military/Commercial Concerns With the People’s Republic of China.

1 Resolved,

2 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF SELECT COMMITTEE.

3 Section 2(f)(1) of House Resolution 5, One Hundred

4 Sixth Congress, agreed to January 6, 1999, is amended

5 by striking ‘‘April 1, 1999’’ and inserting ‘‘April 30, 1999

6 (or, if earlier, the date on which the Select Committee

7 completes its activities)’’.

Æ
### §15105. Promotions

Sections 14307 through 14317 of this title shall apply in promotions of officers in competitive categories of officers designated for purposes of this chapter.

(Added Pub. L. 118–31, div. A, title V, §514(a), Dec. 22, 2023, 137 Stat. 247.)
Exhibit 32.1

Statement of Chief Executive Officer under 18 U.S.C. § 1350

I, Mark J. Ferrer, the chief executive officer of
Critical Path, Inc. (the Company), certify for the purposes of section 1350 of chapter 63 of title 18 of the United States Code that, to the best of my knowledge,



| | (i) | the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2006 (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | ---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                  
|------------------
|/s/ Mark J. Ferrer
|Mark J. Ferrer    

May 16, 2006

A signed original of this written statement required by 18 U.S.C. § 1350 has been provided to Critical Path, Inc. and will be retained by Critical Path, Inc. and furnished to the Securities Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.
# C_2015012EN.01011601.xml

| 15.1.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 12/116 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.1.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 12/116

---

Opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee on the Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) No 1343/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 December 2011 on certain provisions for fishing in the GFCM (General Fisheries Commission for the Mediterranean) Agreement area

COM(2014) 457 final — 2014/0213 COD

(2015/C 012/19)

On 17 July 2014, the European Parliament and on 31 July 2014, the Council respectively decided to consult the European Economic and Social Committee, under Article 43(2) of the TFEU, on the

Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) No 1343/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 December 2011 on certain provisions for fishing in the GFCM (General Fisheries Commission for the Mediterranean) Agreement area

Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) No 1343/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 December 2011 on certain provisions for fishing in the GFCM (General Fisheries Commission for the Mediterranean) Agreement area

COM(2014) 457 final — 2014/0213 COD.

Since the Committee unreservedly endorses the content of the proposal and feels that it requires no comment on its part, it decided, at its 502nd plenary session of 15 and 16 October 2014 (meeting of 15 October 2014), by 172 votes with 4 abstentions, to issue an opinion endorsing the proposed text.

Brussels, 15 October 2014.

The President of the European Economic and Social Committee

Henri MALOSSE

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
financial statements for the three months ended December 31, 1999
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                         562,327
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,380
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               864,707
<PP&E>                                         107,900
<DEPRECIATION>                                  52,552
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 923,256
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          359,923
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         6,215
<OTHER-SE>                                     562,454
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   923,256
<SALES>                                          3,225
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 3,225
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               238,863
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               9,492
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (437,830)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (437,830)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (437,830)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.07)


</TABLE>
**Exhibit
        32.2**
 
 **CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO**
 **18
        U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
 **AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 In
        connection with Amendment No. 1 to the Quarterly Report of Hometown Auto
        Retailers, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q/A for the period ending June
        30,
        2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
        (the "Report"), I, Charles F. Schwartz, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
        certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
        Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)
        The
        Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
        the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)
        The
        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
  
 /s/
        Charles F. Schwartz
 Charles
        F. Schwartz
 Chief
        Financial Officer
 April
        14,
        2006
### ENCLOSURE (2) **EPA Analysis of Milton R. Young Station Unit 1, Compliance Assurance Monitoring Plan Test Data**

**Stack Opacity Compared to Total Particulate Emissions** Opacity lb/MMBTU lb/hr 3.1 0.0074 15.23 3.4 0.0071 16.24 5 0.0108 21.61 11.5 0.0301 66.83 11.6 0.0271 65.59 14.6 0.0442 112.96 14.8 0.042 101.49 15.1 0.0397 80.22 20.8 0.0665 163.68

mean 11.1 0.0305444 71.53889 std dev 6.092413 0.0199422 49.94652

.8*20 16 0.0459 110.4866 .9*20 18 0.0523 126.3838 y = 0.0032x
-0.0053 R2 = 0.9751 y = 7.9486x
- 16.691 R2 = 0.9401

0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000

0 5 10 15 20 25 lb/MMBTU lb

/hr
#### Jessie M. Van Alstine, Respondent, v. The State of New York, Appellant.

Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion.
#### METALOCK REPAIR SERVICE, Inc., Appellant, v. Hal W. HARMAN, Appellee. Lois R. MORRISON, Appellant, v. Hal W. HARMAN, Appellee.

Nos. 12020, 12021.

United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit.

Oct. 20, 1954.

Corbett, Mahoney & Miller, Columbus, Ohio, for appellants.

Wayne S. Gerber, John M. Bowsher, Schmieding & Fultz, Columbus, Ohio, for appellee.

Before ALLEN, MARTIN and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The appeals in these two cases have been heard upon consolidated records, briefs and oral arguments;

And even treating the temporary restraining order entered in each case by the district judge as a temporary injunction in view of his improvident inaction in keeping effective the restraining order in each case for many months without making the restraining order a temporary injunction, it nevertheless follows that, inasmuch as it rested within his discretion to enter an order upon motion directing that the present appellants be made additional parties defendant, such order was not appealable *612because it was not in actuality a final order;

Accordingly, the two causes are remanded to the United States District Court for further procedure.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

# Secretary of Defense Austin Statement on Japan's Release of its New Strategy Documents (National Security Strategy, National Defense Strategy, and Defense Buildup Program)

                DOD Immediate Release  –              

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More