alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 158.52 Application for change in designation of homestead.

Any Osage allottee or the legal guardian thereof may make application to change his homestead for an equal area of his surplus land. The application shall give in detail the reasons why such change is desired and shall be submitted to the Osage Indian Agency on the form “Application to Change Designation of Homestead.”
### **CHAPTER 1209—ACTIVE DUTY**

Sec.
12301.
Reserve components generally.
12302.
Ready Reserve.
12303.
Ready Reserve: members not assigned to, or participating satisfactorily in, units.
12304.
Selected Reserve and certain Individual Ready Reserve members; order to active duty other than during war or national emergency.
12304a.
Army Reserve, Navy Reserve, Marine Corps Reserve, Air Force Reserve: order to active duty to provide assistance in response to a major disaster or emergency.
12304b.
Selected Reserve: order to active duty for preplanned missions in support of the combatant commands.
12305.
Authority of President to suspend certain laws relating to promotion, retirement, and separation.
12306.
Standby Reserve.
12307.
Retired Reserve.
12308.
Retention after becoming qualified for retired pay.
12309.
Reserve officers: use of in expansion of armed forces.
12310.
Reserves: for organizing, administering, etc., reserve components.
12311.
Active duty agreements.
12312.
Active duty agreements: release from duty.
12313.
Reserves: release from active duty.
12314.
Reserves: kinds of duty.
12315.
Reserves: duty with or without pay.
12316.
Payment of certain Reserves while on duty.
12317.
Reserves: theological students; limitations.
12318.
Reserves on active duty: duties; funding.
12319.
Ready Reserve: muster duty.
12320.
Reserve officers: grade in which ordered to active duty.
12321.
Reserve Officer Training Corps units: limitation on number of Reserves assigned.
12322.
Active duty for health care.
12323.
Active duty pending line of duty determination required for response to sexual assault.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**2013**—Pub. L. 112–239, div. A, title V, §571(b), Jan. 2, 2013, 126 Stat. 1753, added item 12323.

**2011**—Pub. L. 112–81, div. A, title V, §§515(a)(2), 516(a)(2), Dec. 31, 2011, 125 Stat. 1394, 1397, added items 12304a and 12304b.

**1999**—Pub. L. 106–65, div. A, title VII, §705(a)(2), Oct. 5, 1999, 113 Stat. 683, added item 12322.

**1997**—Pub. L. 105–85, div. A, title V, §511(e)(2), Nov. 18, 1997, 111 Stat. 1729, inserted "and certain Individual Ready Reserve members" after "Selected Reserve" in item 12304.

**1996**—Pub. L. 104–106, div. A, title XV, §1501(b)(16), Feb. 10, 1996, 110 Stat. 496, substituted a semicolon for a colon in item 12304 and struck out "on active duty" after "Retention" in item 12308.
#### In the Matter of Bruce C. Lee-Clark, an Attorney, Resignor.

[823 NYS2d 702]

Voluntary resignation accepted and name removed from roll of attorneys *(see Matter of Manown,*240 AD2d 83 [1998]). Present—Scudder, J.P., Gorski, Green, Pine and Hayes, JJ. (Filed Oct. 2, 2006.)
**Exhibit 99.2**

 

**Certificatepursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of GB&T Bancshares, Inc.(the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2003, as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, Gregory L. Hamby, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, to thebest of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.                                       The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.                                       The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ Gregory L. Hamby                      |   |
|-------------------------------------------|--------|
| Gregory L. Hamby, Chief Financial Officer |
|                                      |
|                                      |
| May 14, 2003                              |

 

1

----
FTC Consumer Alert

Federal Trade Commission Q Bureau of Consumer Protection Q Office of Consumer and Business Education

F C EDERAL RADE OMMISSION T FTC OR HE ONSUMER

1-877-FTC-HELP www.ftc.gov

Radiation Shields: Do They ‘Cell’

Consumers Short?

These days, it seems like everyone has a cell phone. It’s no wonder that promoters have begun to

pitch shields as protection against the radiation the phones emit. But the Federal Trade Commission

(FTC), the nation’s consumer protection agency, says current claims for the shields are “all talk.”

According to the FTC, there is no scientific proof that the so-called shields significantly reduce

exposure from electromagnetic emissions. In fact, says the agency, products that block only the earpiece — or another small portion of the phone — are totally ineffective because the entire phone emits

electromagnetic waves. What’s more, these shields may interfere with the phone’s signal, cause it to

draw even more power to communicate with the base station, and possibly emit more radiation.

Studies are ongoing about any relationship between the emissions from cell phones and health

problems.

Nevertheless, for cell phone users who want to limit their exposure to the electromagnetic emissions

from their phones, the FTC suggests limiting your cell phone use to short conversations; increasing the

distance between your antenna and your head by using a hands free set or a car phone with the antenna outside the car; or avoiding using cell phones where the signal is poor.

The FTC works for the consumer to prevent fraudulent, deceptive and unfair business practices in

the marketplace and to provide information to help consumers spot, stop and avoid them. To file a

complaint or to get free information on consumer issues, call toll-free, 1-877-FTC-HELP (1-877-382-

4357), or use the complaint form at www.ftc.gov. The FTC enters Internet, telemarketing, identity

theft and other fraud-related complaints into Consumer Sentinel, a secure, online database available to

hundreds of civil and criminal law enforcement agencies in the U.S. and abroad.

February 2002
§ 11.500 Law applicable to civil actions. ( a ) In all civil cases, the Magistrate of a Court of Indian Offenses shall have discretion to apply: ( 1 ) Any laws of the United States that may be applicable;
( 2 ) Any authorized regulations contained in the Code of Federal Regulations; and
( 3 ) Any laws or customs of the tribe occupying the area of Indian country over which the court has jurisdiction that are not prohibited by Federal laws.
( b ) The delineation in paragraph (a) of this section does not establish a hierarchy relative to the applicability of specific law in specific cases.
( c ) Where any doubt arises as to the customs of the tribe, the court may request the advice of counselors familiar with those customs.
( d ) Any matters that are not covered by the laws or customs of the tribe, or by applicable Federal laws and regulations, may be decided by the Court of Indian Offenses according to the laws of the State in which the matter in dispute lies.
[73 FR 39862, July 11, 2008]
AFS-12-337-E June 21, 2012

Exemption No. 10177C Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2010-0970

Mr. Omer ErSelcuk

President/Chief Executive Officer Seaborne Virgin Islands, Inc., d.b.a. Seaborne Airlines 1210 Watergut Street Christianstead, VI 00820

Dear Mr. ErSelcuk:

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your petition to extend Exemption No. 10177, as amended. It explains the basis for our decision and describes its effect.

The Basis for Our Decision

By letter dated April 19, 2012, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Adm inistration (FAA) on behalf of Seaborne Virgin Islands, Inc., d.b.a. Seaborne Airlines (Seaborne Airlines) for an extension of Exemption No. 10177, as amended, to June 30, 2013. That exemption from part 121, appendix K, paragraph 5a of Title 14, C ode of Federal Regulations allows Seaborne Airlines to continue to operate DHC-6-300 float-equipped airplanes after the December 20, 2010, effective date without meeting certain aircraft performance requirements.

In your petition, you indicate that there has been no change in the conditions and reasons relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original exemption.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition

in the Federal Register because the requested extension of the exemption would not set a precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to Seaborne Airlines.2

Our Decision

The FAA has determ ined that the justification for the issuance of Exemption No. 10177, as amended, remains valid with respect to this exemption and is in the public interest. Therefore, under the authority provided by 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator has delegated to me, I grant your petition.

The Effect of Our Decision

Our decision extends the term ination date of Exemption No. 10177, as amended, to June 30, 2013, unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

Sincerely,

/S/

John S. Duncan Deputy Director, Flight Standards

Service
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

# Trafficking in Persons Report 2015

By John F. Kerry, Secretary of State

"This year’s Report places a special emphasis on human trafficking in the global marketplace. It highlights the hidden risks that workers may encounter when seeking employment and the steps that governments and businesses can take to prevent trafficking, including a demand for transparency in global supply chains.

"The bottom line is that this is no time for complacency. Right now, across the globe, victims of human trafficking are daring to imagine the possibility of escape, the chance for a life without fear, and the opportunity to earn a living wage. I echo the words of President Obama and say to them: We hear you, and we will do all we can to make that dream come true. In recent decades, we have learned a great deal about how to break up human trafficking networks and help victims recover in safety and dignity. In years to come, we will apply those lessons relentlessly, and we will not rest until modern slavery is ended." – *John F. Kerry, Secretary of State*

## The Report

The 2015 *Trafficking in Persons Report* is available in PDF and HTML formats. The PDF is available as a complete one-piece file and as individual sections for easier download. To view the PDF files, you will need to download, at no cost, the Adobe Acrobat Reader.

To request a hard copy of the 2015 *Trafficking in Persons Report*, please email TIPOutreach@state.gov and provide your mailing address. Please note that due to high demand, your order may not be processed right away.

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More News/Articles
Relevant Meetings with External Stakeholders since Publication of the 2012 HCFC Proposed Rule:

January 10, 2012 – EPA staff attended Alliance for Responsible Atmospheric Policy board meeting

January 19, 2012 – Meeting with representatives from Rapid Recovery

January 30, 2012 – Meeting with representatives from DuPont 

January 31, 2012 – EPA staff attended the Alliance Refrigerant Imports Committee Meeting 

February 2, 2012 – Meeting with a group of reclaimers (see attached list) 

February 3, 2012 – Meeting with representatives from the Department of Energy

February 6, 2012 – Meeting with representatives from United Technologies (Carrier) 

February 8, 2012 – Meeting with representatives from the Air-Conditioning, Heating, and Refrigeration Institute 

(AHRI)

February 15, 2012 – Meeting with representatives from Honeywell 

February 22, 2012 – Meeting with representatives from Hudson Technologies

March 5, 2012 – Meeting with representatives from Solvay

March 19, 2012 – Meeting with representatives from the Food Marketing Institute

March 21, 2012 – EPA staff presented at the AHRI Media Roundtable

March 21 – Meeting with representatives from the Air Conditioning Contractors of America (ACCA) and Heating, 

Air-conditioning & Refrigeration Distributors International (HARDI)

June 6, 2012 – Meeting with representatives from HARDI and Johnstone Supply

June 29, 2012 – Meeting with representatives from DuPont

January 16, 2013 – Meeting with representatives from DuPont

February 12, 2013 – Meeting with representatives of Honeywell

This document does not reflect meetings held at the Office of Management and Budget while the rule was being 

reviewed in accordance with E.O. 12866 and E.O. 13563 . For a list of those meetings and the participants, please 

visit http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/oira_2060_meetings/.
### §12323. Active duty pending line of duty determination required for response to sexual assault

(a) Continuation on Active Duty.—In the case of a member of a reserve component who is the alleged victim of sexual assault committed while on active duty and who is expected to be released from active duty before the determination is made regarding whether the member was assaulted while in the line of duty (in this section referred to as a "line of duty determination"), the Secretary concerned, upon the request of the member, may order the member to be retained on active duty until completion of the line of duty determination. A member eligible for continuation on active duty under this subsection shall be informed as soon as practicable after the alleged assault of the option to request continuation on active duty under this subsection.

(b) Return to Active Duty.—In the case of a member of a reserve component not on active duty who is the alleged victim of a sexual assault that occurred while the member was on active duty and when the line of duty determination is not completed, the Secretary concerned, upon the request of the member, may order the member to active duty for such time as necessary for completion of the line of duty determination.

(c) Regulations.—The Secretaries of the military departments shall prescribe regulations to carry out this section, subject to guidelines prescribed by the Secretary of Defense. The guidelines of the Secretary of Defense shall provide that—

(1) a request submitted by a member described in subsection (a) or (b) to continue on active duty, or to be ordered to active duty, respectively, must be decided within 30 days from the date of the request; and

(2) if the request is denied, the member may appeal to the first general officer or flag officer in the chain of command of the member, and in the case of such an appeal a decision on the appeal must be made within 15 days from the date of the appeal.

(Added Pub. L. 112–239, div. A, title V, §571(a), Jan. 2, 2013, 126 Stat. 1753.)
#### § 20.5 Sources of information.

Pertinent sources of information useful to the public, in areas of public interest such as employment, consumer activities, contracts, services to small business, and other topics of public interest should be provided with each agency statement. These sources of information shall plainly identify the places at which the public may obtain information or make submittals or requests.
#### Robert Hill v. The State.

No. 23015.

Delivered December 20, 1944.

*661The opinion states the case.

*John Glass,*of Tyler, for appellant.

*Ernest S. Goens,*State’s Attorney, of Austin, for the State.

HAWKINS, Presiding Judge.

Upon appellant’s plea of guilty to a charge of unlawfully carrying a pistol his punishment was by the court assessed at six months’ confinement in the county jail.

No statement of facts or bills of exception are in the record. In his motion for new trial appellant set up newly discovered evidence, which, of course, cannot be appraised in the state of the record.

The judgment is affirmed.
#### Charlotte M. Wilson, Appellant, v. William P. W. Haff, Respondent.

Judgment of the Municipal Court reversed and new trial ordered, costs to abide the event, on the ground that it was error to nonsuit the plaintiff forasmuch as she had given evidence tending to establish the connection of the defendant with the contract sued upon. Jenks, Hooker, Gaynor, Rich and Miller, JJ., concurred
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with Amendment No. 1 to the Quarterly Report of Hometown Auto
Retailers, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q/A for the period ending March 31,
2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Charles F. Schwartz, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


/s/ Charles F. Schwartz
------------------------------
Charles F. Schwartz
Chief Financial Officer
September 20, 2005
Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certification

      I, Paul Vanderslice, certify that:

      1.    I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K, and all reports on
            Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period
            covered by this annual report on Form 10-K, of UBS-Citigroup
            Commercial Mortgage Trust 2011-C1 (the "Exchange Act Periodic
            Reports");

      2.    Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act Periodic Reports,
            taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a
            material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
            make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under
            which such statements were made, not misleading with respect
            to the period covered by this annual report;

      3.    Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and
            other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for
            the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange
            Act Periodic Reports;

      4.    Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement(s)
            required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and
            except as disclosed in the Exchange Act Periodic Reports, the
            servicers have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing
            agreements in all material respects; and

      5.    All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing
            criteria for asset-backed securities and their related
            attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing
            criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included
            in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB
            and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as
            an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in
            this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance described
            in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Wells Fargo Bank,
National Association, as master servicer;  Deutsche Bank Trust Company
Americas, as trustee, custodian and certificate administrator; Midland Loan
Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association, as sub-servicer;
Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, as special servicer; TriMont Real Estate
Advisors, Inc., as operating advisor; KeyBank National Association, as
sub-servicer; CoreLogic Commercial Real Estate Services, Inc., as servicing
function participant; and National Tax Search, LLC, as servicing function
participant.

Date: March 31, 2015

	                   /s/ Paul Vanderslice
	                   Paul Vanderslice
	                   Vice President, Citigroup Commercial
	                   Mortgage Securities Inc.
	                   (senior officer in charge of securitization of
	                   the depositor)