alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 1000.404 Must self-governance Tribes/Consortia comply with the Secretarial approval requirements of 25 U.S.C. 81; 82a; and 476 regarding professional and attorney contracts?

No, for the period that an agreement entered into under this part is in effect, the provisions of 25 U.S.C. 81, 82a, and 476, do not apply to attorney and other professional contracts by participating Tribes/Consortia.
EX-35.3
(logo) Rialto
       CAPITAL


February 28, 2014


To: GS Mortgage Securities Corporation II, as Depositor
    Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Trustee
    KeyCorp Real Estate Capital Markets, Inc., as Master Servicer


2013 Annual Statement of Servicer Compliance (Item 1123)

Name of Mortgage Loan Pass-Through Certificate Series:

* GSMS 2012-GC6

(Referred to herein as "Security Agreement" or "Security Agreements")

The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, as
special servicer (the "Special Servicer") herein certifies to the following:

1. All servicing activities and performance of such servicing activities under
   each of the Security Agreements are performed on behalf of the Special
   Servicer.

2. A review of the servicing activities and performance by the Special
   Servicer for the period of October 18, 2013 to December 31, 2013 (the
   "Reporting Period"), in accordance with the servicing agreements applicable
   to each Security Agreement has been conducted under my supervision.

3. To the best of my knowledge, Rialto has fulfilled all of its obligations
   under the terms of the Security Agreements, in all material respects for the
   Reporting Period and if there has been a failure to fulfill any such
   obligations in any material respect, each failure and the nature and status
   thereof has been specifically identified herewith.


Certified by:  /s/ Thekla Salzman
               Thekla Salzman
               Chief Administrative Officer

Date: February 28, 2014
#### § 166.417 May an individual Indian landowner modify the terms of the permit on a fractionated tract for advance grazing rental payment?

No. An individual Indian landowner of a fractionated tract may not modify a permit to allow a grazing rental payment in advance of the due date specified in the initial approved permit.
# C_2013025EN.01002801.xml

| 26.1.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 25/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.1.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 25/28

---

Explanatory Notes to the Combined Nomenclature of the European Union

2013/C 25/03

Pursuant to the second indent of Article 9(1)(a) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 of 23 July 1987 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff (1), the Explanatory Notes to the Combined Nomenclature of the European Union (2) are hereby amended as follows:

1

2

On page 93, between the title of heading ‘2206 00 Other fermented beverages (for example, cider, perry, mead); mixtures of fermented beverages and mixtures of fermented beverages and non-alcoholic beverages, not elsewhere specified or included’ and the row ‘2206 00 10 Piquette’, the following text is inserted:

2206 00 Other fermented beverages (for example, cider, perry, mead); mixtures of fermented beverages and mixtures of fermented beverages and non-alcoholic beverages, not elsewhere specified or included

2206 00 10 Piquette

‘As regards the classification of fermented alcohol-based beverages to which distilled alcohol, water and other substances (such as syrup, various aromas and colourings, and, in some cases, a cream base) have been added, see the judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union in Case C-150/08. In accordance with the judgment, if those additions result in losing the taste, smell and/or appearance of a beverage produced from a particular fruit or natural product, that is to say a fermented beverage of heading 2206, classification under heading 2208 takes place.’

On page 95, between the row ‘2208 90 78 Other spirituous beverages’ and the title of heading ‘2209 00 Vinegar and substitutes for vinegar obtained from acetic acid’, the following text is inserted:

2208 90 78 Other spirituous beverages

2209 00 Vinegar and substitutes for vinegar obtained from acetic acid

| ‘2208 90 91 and 2208 90 99 | Undenatured ethyl alcohol of an alcoholic strength by volume of less than 80 % vol., in containers holding

  These subheadings include a liquid described as a “malt beer base” with an alcoholic strength by volume of 14 % and obtained from brewed beer which has been clarified and then subjected to ultrafiltration, by which the concentration of ingredients such as bitter substances and proteins has been reduced (see judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union in Case C-196/10).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘2208 90 91 and 2208 90 99

Undenatured ethyl alcohol of an alcoholic strength by volume of less than 80 % vol., in containers holding

These subheadings include a liquid described as a “malt beer base” with an alcoholic strength by volume of 14 % and obtained from brewed beer which has been clarified and then subjected to ultrafiltration, by which the concentration of ingredients such as bitter substances and proteins has been reduced (see judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union in Case C-196/10).’

---

(1)  OJ L 256, 7.9.1987, p. 1.

1

(2)  OJ C 137, 6.5.2011, p. 1.

2

---
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


C\_2013084EN.01005401.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 22.3.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 84/54 |

---

Information communicated by Member States regarding State aid granted under Commission Regulation (EC) No 800/2008 declaring certain categories of aid compatible with the common market in application of Articles 87 and 88 of the Treaty (General Block Exemption Regulation)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2013/C 84/05

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Reference number of the State Aid | SA.22524 (XR28/07) | |
| Member State | Austria | |
| Member State reference number | — | |
| Name of the Region (NUTS) | STEIERMARK Article 107(3)(c) | |
| Granting authority | | | | --- | | Steirische Wirtschaftsförderungsges.m.b.H | | Nikolaiplatz 2 | | 8020 Graz | | annemarie.goetschl@sfg.at | | erich.steiner@sfg.at | | 0316/ 7093-114 bzw. DW 115 | | www.sfg.at | | |
| Title of the aid measure | Aktionsprogramm Innovative Investitionen | |
| National legal basis (Reference to the relevant national official publication) | Steiermärkisches Wirtschaftsförderungsgesetz LGBL. Nr. 14/2002 in der geltenden Fassung Allgemeine Rahmenrichtlinie für die Gewährung von Förderungen nach dem Steiermärkischen Wirtschaftsförderungsgesetz (Beschluss der Steiermärkischen Landesregierung vom 15.5.2000, GZ LBD-WIP 13 Fo 7-00/46) Richtlinie für die Steirische Wirtschaftsförderung (eingereicht zur Notifizierung bei der EK am 29.8.2006; N 572/2006) | |
| Type of measure | Scheme | |
| Amendment of an existing aid measure | Modification N 572/2006 | |
| Duration | 31.1.2007-31.12.2013 | |
| Economic sector(s) concerned | All economic sectors eligible to receive aid | |
| Type of beneficiary | — | |
| Annual overall amount of the budget planned under the scheme | EUR 105,00 (in millions) | |
| For guarantees | EUR 15,00 (in millions) | |
| Aid Instrument (Article 5) | Direct grant | |
| Reference to the Commission Decision | — | |
| If co-financed by Community funds | — | |
| Objectives | Maximum aid intensity in % or Maximum aid amount in national currency | SME-bonuses in % |
| | 0 EUR | 0 % |

Web link to the full text of the aid measure:

http://www.sfg.at/cms/82/

‘Aktionsprogramm — Innovative Investitionen’

---
# C_2013172EN.01000302.xml

| 18.6.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 172/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.6.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 172/3

---

Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries

2013/C 172/05

In accordance with Article 35(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), a decision has been taken to close the fishery as set down in the following table:

1

| Date and time of closure | 3.5.2013 |
| --- | --- |
| Duration | 3.5.2013-30.6.2013 |
| Member State | European Union (all Member States) |
| Stock or group of stocks | RED/N3M |
| Species | Redfish (Sebastes spp.) |
| Zone | NAFO 3M |
| Type(s) of fishing vessels | — |
| Reference number | FS03TQ40 |

Date and time of closure

3.5.2013

Duration

3.5.2013-30.6.2013

Member State

European Union (all Member States)

Stock or group of stocks

RED/N3M

Species

Redfish (Sebastes spp.)

Sebastes

Zone

NAFO 3M

Type(s) of fishing vessels

—

Reference number

FS03TQ40

---

(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.

1

---
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# USNS Mercy (T-AH 19) Transports Six Injured from Bougainville to Ship for Critical Care

By Mass Communications Specialist 1st Class Trevor AndersenPacific Partnership Public Affairs

                ARAWA, Autonomous Region of Bougainville, Papua New Guinea  –              

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More News/Articles
### **CHAPTER 891—NAMES AND INSIGNIA**

Sec.
8921.
Unauthorized use of Marine Corps insignia.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**2018**—Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, §807(e)(4), (f)(1), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1838, redesignated chapter 663 of this title as this chapter and item 7881 as 8921.
|    |                                                                                                                       |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |

|    |                                                                                                                                                                  |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of HealthSouth Corporation. |

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |  |  |
|   | By: | /s/ JAY GRINNEY |   |
|   |   | Name:  Jay Grinney |   |
|   |   | Title:    President and Chief Executive Officer |   |
§ 166.909 What are my obligations to the BIA after I participate in an agriculture education program? ( a ) Individuals completing agriculture education programs with an obligated service requirement may be offered full time permanent employment with an approved organization to fulfill their obligated service within 90 days of the date all program education requirements have been completed. If employment is not offered within the 90-day period, the student will be relieved of obligated service requirements. Not less than 30 days before the start of employment, the employer must notify the participant of the work assignment, its location and the date work must begin. If the employer is other than the BIA, the employer must also notify us.
( b ) Employment time that can be credited toward obligated service requirement will begin the day after all program education requirements have been completed, with the exception of the agriculture intern program which includes the special provisions outlined in § 166.901(f)(4) of this subpart. The minimum service obligation period will be one year of full time employment.
( c ) The employer has the right to designate the location of employment for fulfilling the service obligation.
( d ) A participant in any of the agriculture education programs with an obligated service requirement may, within 30 days of completing all program education requirements, request a deferment of obligated service to pursue postgraduate or post-doctoral studies. In such cases, we will issue a decision within 30 days of receipt of the request for deferral. We may grant such a request; however, deferments granted in no way waive or otherwise affect obligated service requirements.
( e ) A participant in any of the agriculture education programs with an obligated service requirement may, within 30 days of completing all program education requirements, request a waiver of obligated service based on personal or family hardship. We may grant a full or partial waiver or deny the request for wavier. In such cases, we will issue a decision within 30 days of receiving the request for waiver.
#### § 117.9 Construction and repairs.

Upon written application by an adult Indian, the superintendent may disburse not to exceed $1,000 during any one fiscal year from the surplus funds of such Indian to make repairs and improvements to restricted real property and in addition not to exceed $300 for new construction. When such expenditures are being made on property producing an income, reimbursement shall be required from such income unless otherwise directed by the Commissioner. When an Indian refuses to make application for funds to defray the cost of repairs necessary to preserve restricted property, the superintendent may, when authorized by the Commissioner, expend the surplus funds of the Indian for such repairs.
“Disclaimer of Endorsement: Reference herein to any specific commercial products, process, or 

service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise, does not necessarily constitute or 

imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government.”
# C_2013353EN.01001001.xml

| 3.12.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 353/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.12.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 353/10

---

Commission communication pursuant to Article 16(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community

Establishment of public service obligations in respect of scheduled air services

(Text with EEA relevance)

2013/C 353/05

| Member State | Portugal |
| --- | --- |
| Concerned route | Porto Santo–Funchal–Porto Santo |
| Date of entry into force of the public service obligations | From 1 June 2014 |
| Address where the text and any relevant information and/or documentation related to the public service obligation can be obtained | Instituto Nacional de Aviação Civil, I.P. |
| Rua B, Edifícios 4.o, 5.o e 6.o — Aeroporto de Lisboa |
| 1749-034 Lisboa |
| PORTUGAL |
| Tel. +351 218423500 |
| Fax +351 218423582 |
| Internet: http://www.vortalGOV.pt |
| E-mail: concurso.osp@inac.pt |

Member State

Portugal

Concerned route

Porto Santo–Funchal–Porto Santo

Date of entry into force of the public service obligations

From 1 June 2014

Address where the text and any relevant information and/or documentation related to the public service obligation can be obtained

Instituto Nacional de Aviação Civil, I.P.

Rua B, Edifícios 4.o, 5.o e 6.o — Aeroporto de Lisboa

o

o

o

1749-034 Lisboa

PORTUGAL

Tel. +351 218423500

Fax +351 218423582

Internet: http://www.vortalGOV.pt

E-mail: concurso.osp@inac.pt

---
### §2615. Military museums and military education programs: cooperative agreement authority

(a) Use Authorized.—The Secretary concerned may enter into a cooperative agreement with a nonprofit entity for purposes related to—

(1) a military museum program; or

(2) the support of a military educational institution program.

(b) Cooperative Agreement Described.—For purposes of subsection (a), an authorized cooperative agreement is described in section 6305 of title 31, except that the use of a cooperative agreement by the Secretary concerned is limited to nonprofit entities.

(Added Pub. L. 112–239, div. B, title XXVIII, §2852(b)(1), Jan. 2, 2013, 126 Stat. 2161.)
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 11**  **- 6165** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

– Appellee ,
v. MARTIN AVERY HUGHES , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia , at Abingdon
. James P. Jones , District Judge. ( 1:08

- cr - 00024

- jpj

- 35; 1:10

- cv - 80232

- jpj

- mfu )

Submitted : June 29, 2011 Decided: July 11, 2011

Before MOTZ, KING, and DUNCAN , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curia m opinion
. Martin Avery Hughes, Appellant Pro Se. Jennifer R. Bockhorst, Assistant United States Attorney, Abingdon, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Mart in Avery Hughes seeks to app eal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. A. § 2255 ( West Supp. 2010 ) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (B) (200 6 ). A certificate of
app ealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (200 6 ). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable juri sts would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedur al grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Hughes has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials3 be fore the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process. DISMISSED
§ 162.555 May a WSR lease provide for non-monetary or varying types of compensation? ( a ) A WSR lease may provide for the following, subject to the conditions in paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section: ( 1 ) Alternative forms of compensation, including but not limited to, in-kind consideration and payments based on percentage of income; or
( 2 ) Varying types of consideration at specific stages during the life of the lease, including but not limited to fixed annual payments during installation, payments based on income during an operational period, and bonuses.
( b ) For tribal land, we will defer to the tribe's determination that the compensation in paragraph (a) of this section is in its best interest, if the tribe submits a signed certification or tribal authorization stating that it has determined the compensation in paragraph (a) of this section to be in its best interest.
( c ) For individually owned land, we may approve a lease that provides for compensation under paragraph (a) of this section if we determine that it is in the best interest of the Indian landowners.
U.S . Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration
June 5, 2014 

### Mr. Russ Maguire, A.A.E. Airport Manager New England Region

Norwood Memorial Airport 125 Access Road Norwood, MA 02062 Dear Mr. Maguire: 12 New England Executive Park Burlington, MA 01803

The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has received a complaint from Boston Executive Helicopters filed under Federal Aviation Regulation (FAR) Part 13, FAA Investigative and Enforcement Procedures (14 CFRPart 13). The complaint alleges that the Town ofNorwood, as airport sponsor ofNorwood Memorial Airport, has violated Federal obligations that it agreed to with the FAA. Please review the attached documents and provide your writtenresponse to this complaint as well as the status ofany ongoing effort to mutually resolve any ofthese allegations. Please provide your writtenresponse to this FAA office by July 10,2014,with a copy to Boston Executive Helicopters. Ifyou have any questions concerning the investigative process, please e-mail Thomas Vick, FAA NewEngland Region Compliance Specialist at thomas.vick@faa.gov.

er, Airports Division Enclosure cc: Boston Executive Helicopters
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Regional Ambassadors Conference 2024

U.S. Indo Pacific Command

Adm. John C. Aquilino, Commander, U.S. Indo-Pacific Command, hosts the Regional Ambassadors Conference (RAC), at the USINDOPACOM headquarters in Hawaii on Jan. 22-24. The RAC brought together more than 30 ambassadors, military representatives and foreign policy advisors, for discussions aimed at enhancing U.S. interagency collaboration in the Indo-Pacific region. USINDOPACOM is committed to working with Allies and partners toward the shared vision of a secure, rules-based, and open Indo-Pacific region.

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT