alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 1000.240 What construction programs included in an AFA are subject to this subpart? ( a ) All BIA and non-BIA construction programs included in an AFA are subject to this subpart. This includes design, construction, repair, improvement, expansion, replacement or demolition of buildings or facilities, and other related work for Federal, or Federally funded Tribal, facilities and projects.
( b ) The following programs and activities are not construction programs and activities: ( 1 ) Activities limited to providing planning services, administrative support services, coordination, responsibility for the construction project, day-to-day on-site management on site-management and administration of the project, which may include cost management, project budgeting, project scheduling and procurement except that all project design and actual construction activities are subject to all the requirements of subpart K, whether performed by a Tribe/Consortium, subcontractor, or consultant.
( 2 ) Housing Improvement Program or road maintenance program activities of BIA;
( 3 ) Operation and maintenance programs; and
( 4 ) Non-403(c) programs that are less than $100,000, subject to section 403(e)(2) of the Act, other applicable Federal law, and § 1000.256 of this subpart.
Statement Pursuant to Section
906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

The undersigned, Richard Rubin, CEO, CFO and
Chairman of Peregrine Industries, Inc, a Florida corporation, hereby makes the following
certification as required by Section 906(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, with
respect to the following of this report filed pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934: Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011.

The undersigned certifies that the above
quarterly report fully complies with the requirements of Section 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, and information contained in the above report fairly presents, in
all respects, the financial condition of Peregrine Industries, Inc. and results of its
operations.

Date: May 11, 2011/s/ Richard RubinCEO, CFO and Chairman
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________ No. 95-30832 Conference Calendar

__________________ HORACE ALEXANDER, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus ROBERT TROYER, Public Defender of the 21st Judicial District Court of Amite, Louisiana, Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana

USDC No. 95-CV-1126

- - - - - - - - - - March 6, 1996 Before GARWOOD, JONES, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Horace Alexander, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis (IFP), appeals the dismissal of his civil rights action as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d). Alexander sued Robert Troyer, a public defender, and the Public Defenders Office of the 21st Judicial District Court of Amite, Louisiana, because Alexander was incarcerated for approximately fourteen months without being convicted or sentenced.No. 95-30832 -2- We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and perceive no issue of arguable merit. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal as frivolous. 5th Cir. R. 42.2. We caution Alexander that any additional frivolous appeals filed by him will invite the imposition of sanctions. To avoid sanctions, Alexander is further cautioned to review any pending appeals to ensure that they do not raise arguments that are frivolous because they have been previously decided by this
court. APPEAL DISMISSED; SANCTIONS WARNING ISSUED.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News

U.S. Pacific Fleet Announces 29th RIMPAC ExerciseMay 21, 2024 — Approximately 29 nations, 40 surface ships, 3 submarines, 14 national land forces, over 150 aircraft and more than 25,000 personnel will participate in the biennial Rim of the Pacific (RIMPAC) exercise scheduled June 26 to Aug. 2, in and around the Hawaiian Islands... MORE 

----

Combined US, coalition force increase combat effectiveness during Indo-Pacific Virtual Flag exerciseDecember 11, 2023 — For the first time in the fourteen-year history of the Virtual Flag: Coalition exercise, integrated forces from the United States, United Kingdom, Australia, and Canada fought against a peer adversary in a virtual Indo-Pacific area of responsibility. To increase combat effectiveness, the combined force engaged jointly across air, land, sea, space, and cyber domains.... MORE 

----

Nimitz Carrier Strike Group Returns to San Diego from DeploymentJune 29, 2023 — Ships from the Nimitz Carrier Strike Group (Nimitz CSG) returned to San Diego June 28, concluding a seven-month deployment to U.S. 3rd and 7th Fleet areas of operations (AO)... MORE 

----

2024 (327)2023 (825)2022 (1193)2021 (1066)2020 (1083)2019 (1166)2018 (1116)2017 (1356)2016 (1475)2015 (1408)2014 (904)2013 (32)2012 (4)

About DoDDoD CareersJoin the MilitaryNewsUSA.govPhotos & VideosPrivacy & SecurityTop Issues

US INDOPACOM Inspector GeneralDoD Inspector General Accessibility/Section 508DoD FOIAUS INDOPACOM FOIALink DisclaimerNo FEAR ActRecovery ActINDOPACOM Webmaster

                  - Facebook
                  - X
                  - YouTube
                  - Instagram
                  - RSS

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
#### § 1000.393 How does the Privacy Act apply?

At the option of the Tribe/Consortium, section 108(b) of Pub. L. 93-638, as amended, provides that records of the Tribe/Consortium must not be considered Federal records for the purposes of the Privacy Act.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

# Intent to Open U.S. Embassy Port Vila, Republic of Vanuatu

Media Note

U.S. Department of State - To further strengthen the bilateral relationship, the U.S. Department of State has conveyed the U.S. intent to the Ni-Vanuatu Government to open an embassy in the Republic of Vanuatu, subject to Congressional notification.Consistent with the U.S. Indo-Pacific strategy, a permanent diplomatic presence in Vanuatu would allow the U.S. Government to deepen relationships with Ni-Vanuatu officials and society. Establishing U.S. Embassy Port Vila would facilitate areas of potential bilateral cooperation and development assistance, including efforts to tackle the climate crisis.The United States currently maintains diplomatic relations with the Government of Vanuatu but does not have an embassy in Vanuatu. The Charge d’Affaires, ad interim, in Port Moresby is accredited to Vanuatu and regularly travels to Vanuatu.

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

# U.S. and Korean Submariners Deepen Understanding during 40th SWCM

By Cmdr. Aaron KakielSubmarine Group 7 Public Affairs

                FLEET ACTIVITIES YOKOSUKA, Japan  –              

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

40th Submarine Warfare Committee Meeting

pacom

news

articles
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

__________________________________________

)

MAXINE BLOCKER-BURNETTE, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) Civil Action No. 09-1185 (PLF)

)

THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, et al., )

)

Defendants. )

__________________________________________)

ORDER

For the reasons stated in the Memorandum Opinion issued this same day, it is

hereby

ORDERED that defendants’ motion to dismiss or, in the alternative, for summary

judgment [6], is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Plaintiff’s claim for unliquidated

damages under the District of Columbia Human Rights Act will be dismissed and the

individually named defendants, Tori Fernandez-Whitney and Carolos Cano, will also be

dismissed. The rest of plaintiff’s claims may proceed; it is

FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion to maintain her claim for age

discrimination [11] is DENIED as moot; and it is

FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall meet and confer and file a joint

report with the Court regarding how they wish to proceed in this matter by September 13, 2010.

/s/________________________________

PAUL L. FRIEDMAN

United States District Judge 

DATE: August 13, 2010
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

# Arctic Spark Innovation Lab Takes Steps in Upgrading Cold Weather Gear 

By Airman 1st Class Quatasia CarterJBER Public Affairs

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More
#### In the Matter of Olivia F., a Child Alleged to be Permanently Neglected. Melissa F., Appellant; Jewish Child Care Association, Respondent.

[823 NYS2d 393]

Order of disposition, Family Court, Bronx County (Carol Stokinger, J.), entered on or about September 9, 2005, which, upon a fact-finding determination of permanent neglect, *235terminated respondent’s parental rights to the subject child and committed the child’s guardianship and custody to petitioner agency and the Commissioner of Social Services for the purpose of adoption, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The agency satisfied its statutory burden of making diligent efforts to encourage and strengthen the parental relationship (see Social Services Law § 384-b [7] [f]). Those efforts included scheduling regular visitation between mother and child, referring and encouraging the mother to attend and complete a drug treatment program, and referring her to domestic violence and anger management programs *(see Matter of Jonathan M.,*19 AD3d 197 [2005], *lv denied*5 NY3d 798 [2005]; *Matter of Byron Christopher Malik J.,*309 AD2d 669 [2003]). The record clearly and convincingly shows that despite these efforts, respondent missed the majority of her scheduled visits, failed to complete both a drug treatment and an anger management program, and failed to seek domestic violence counseling. Petitioner thereby established permanent neglect *(see Matter of La’Asia Lanae S.,*23 AD3d 271 [2005]) and failure to plan for the child’s future *(Matter ofMaryline*A., 22 AD3d 227 [2005]).

The evidence at the dispositional hearing clearly demonstrated that terminating respondent’s parental rights so as to facilitate the child’s adoption by her foster mother was in the child’s best interests. The child has been living with her foster mother for three years, and is receiving good care in a safe, loving, consistent and nurturing environment *(see Matter of Martin P.J.S.,*2 AD3d 106 [2003]). Concur—Friedman, J.P, Marlow, Sullivan, Nardelli and Gonzalez, JJ.
### §12304a. Army Reserve, Navy Reserve, Marine Corps Reserve, and Air Force Reserve: order to active duty to provide assistance in response to a major disaster or emergency

(a) Authority.—When a Governor requests Federal assistance in responding to a major disaster or emergency (as those terms are defined in section 102 of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5122)), the Secretary of Defense may, without the consent of the member affected, order any unit, and any member not assigned to a unit organized to serve as a unit, of the Army Reserve, Navy Reserve, Marine Corps Reserve, and Air Force Reserve to active duty for a continuous period of not more than 120 days to respond to the Governor's request.

(b) Exclusion From Strength Limitations.—Members ordered to active duty under this section shall not be counted in computing authorized strength of members on active duty or members in grade under this title or any other law.

(c) Termination of Duty.—Whenever any unit or member of the reserve components is ordered to active duty under this section, the service of all units or members so ordered to active duty may be terminated by order of the Secretary of Defense or law.

(Added Pub. L. 112–81, div. A, title V, §515(a)(1), Dec. 31, 2011, 125 Stat. 1394.)
### §1217. Academy cadets and midshipmen: applicability of chapter

(a) This chapter applies to cadets at the United States Military Academy, the United States Air Force Academy, and the United States Coast Guard Academy and midshipmen of the United States Naval Academy, but only with respect to physical disabilities incurred after October 28, 2004.

(b) Monthly cadet pay and monthly midshipman pay under section 203(c) of title 37 shall be considered to be basic pay for purposes of this chapter and the computation of retired pay and severance and separation pay to which entitlement is established under this chapter.

(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 100; Pub. L. 85–861, §33(a)(7), Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1564; Pub. L. 108–375, div. A, title V, §555(b)(1), Oct. 28, 2004, 118 Stat. 1914; Pub. L. 109–364, div. A, title X, §1071(a)(6), Oct. 17, 2006, 120 Stat. 2398.)

| Revised section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1217 | [No source]. | [No source]. |

The revised section is inserted to reflect the limited definition of the word "member" in section 102(b) of the Career Compensation Act of 1949 (37 U.S.C. 231(b)).

#### 1958 Act

Aviation cadets were omitted from chapter 61 because Title IV of the Career Compensation Act of 1949 (formerly 37 U.S.C. 271 et seq.), which was the source law for this chapter, covered only members entitled to basic pay and it was believed that aviation cadets were not so entitled. However, the Comptroller General has ruled that aviation cadets are entitled to basic pay (30 Comp. Gen. 431). Accordingly, aviation cadets were covered by Title IV and should not be excepted from chapter 61.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2006—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 109–364 substituted "October 28, 2004" for "the date of the enactment of the Ronald W. Reagan National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2005".

2004—Pub. L. 108–375 amended section catchline and text generally. Prior to amendment, text read as follows: "This chapter does not apply to cadets at the United States Military Academy, the United States Air Force Academy, or the Coast Guard Academy, or to midshipmen of the Navy."

1958—Pub. L. 85–861 struck out provisions which made chapter inapplicable to aviation cadets.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1958 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 85–861 effective Aug. 10, 1956, see section 33(g) of Pub. L. 85–861, set out as a note under section 101 of this title.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 106 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 106

Expressing the appreciation and thanks of the House of Representatives 
   for the extraordinary efforts of the United States Capitol Police 
                  during the impeachment proceedings.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 10, 1999

Mr. Weldon of Pennsylvania (for himself, Mr. DeLay, Mr. Cunningham, Mr. 
  Holden, Mrs. Morella, Mr. Saxton, Mr. Traficant, Mr. Underwood, Mr. 
Neal of Massachusetts, Mr. Crowley, Mr. Brown of California, Mr. Brown 
of Ohio, Mr. Shows, Mr. Salmon, Mr. Wolf, Mr. Peterson of Pennsylvania, 
  Mr. Barrett of Nebraska, Mr. Stump, Mr. Franks of New Jersey, Mrs. 
Kelly, Mr. Ney, Mr. Green of Texas, Mr. LoBiondo, Mr. Largent, Mr. Barr 
   of Georgia, Mr. McGovern, Mr. Luther, Mr. Coyne, Mr. English, Mr. 
   Tancredo, Mr. Latham, Mr. Foley, Mr. Calvert, Mr. Ballenger, Ms. 
Lofgren, Mr. Reyes, Mr. Sessions, Mr. Bliley, Mr. Gibbons, Mr. Ramstad, 
Mr. Walsh, Mr. Watts of Oklahoma, Mr. Stearns, Mr. McNulty, Mr. Ewing, 
 Mr. Gonzalez, Mr. Goode, Mr. Wynn, Mr. Portman, Mr. Meehan, Mr. Davis 
   of Florida, Mr. Fossella, Ms. Kilpatrick, Mr. Sensenbrenner, Mrs. 
 Chenoweth, Ms. Kaptur, Mr. Frost, Mr. Hyde, Mr. Hayworth, Mr. Rogan, 
    Mr. Davis of Virginia, and Mr. Collins) submitted the following 
      resolution; which was   referred to the Committee on House 
                             Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Expressing the appreciation and thanks of the House of Representatives 
   for the extraordinary efforts of the United States Capitol Police 
                  during the impeachment proceedings.

Whereas the United States Capitol Police provide around the clock protection of 
        Members of Congress, staff, visitors, and the United States Capitol 
        grounds;
Whereas United States Capitol Police officers have worked countless hours 
        outside of their normal shifts since the beginning of the impeachment 
        proceedings, often working double shifts;
Whereas United States Capitol Police officers have dutifully guarded all of the 
        critical documents and tapes that were pertinent to the trial;
Whereas United States Capitol Police officers traveled outside of Capitol Hill 
        to ensure the protection of Members of Congress and witnesses of the 
        trial during depositions; and
Whereas the United States Capitol Police force has increased the level of 
        security at the United States Capitol during the impeachment trial: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Members of the House of Representatives express 
their appreciation and thanks to the United States Capitol Police 
officers for their hard work and long hours throughout the impeachment 
proceedings.
                                 <all>
```