alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 426.108 Fees charged to locate, review, or copy records. ( a ) The Commission will charge no fees for search time or for any other time expended by the Commission to review a record. However, the Commission may charge fees where you request that a copy be made of a record to which you have been granted access. Where a copy of the record must be made in order to provide access to the record (*e.g.,* computer printout where no screen reading is available), the copy will be made available to you without cost.
( b ) Copies of records made by photocopy or similar process will be charged to you at the rate of $0.12 per page. Where records are not susceptible to photocopying (*e.g.,* punch cards, magnetic tapes, or oversize materials), you will be charged actual cost as determined on a case-by-case basis. Copying fees will not be charged if the cost of collecting a fee would be equal to or greater than the fee itself. Copying fees for contemporaneous requests by the same individual shall be aggregated to determine the total fee.
( c ) Special and additional services provided at your request, such as certification or authentication, postal insurance, and special mailing arrangement costs, will be charged to you at the market rate.
( d ) You may request that a copying fee not be charged or, alternatively, be reduced, by submitting a written petition to the Commission's General Counsel (see § 426.103) asserting that you are indigent. If the General Counsel determines, based on the petition, that you are indigent and that the Commission's resources permit a waiver of all or part of the fee, the General Counsel may, in his or her discretion, waive or reduce the copying fee.
( e ) All fees shall be paid before any copying request is undertaken.
Exhibit 35.1a



|     |  |  |                                     | 
|---- |  |  | ----------------------------------- | 
|LOGO |  |  | 1 Corelogic DriveWestlake, TX 76262 | 

SERVICER COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATION

This Servicer Compliance Certification is issued pursuant to the Tax Outsourcing Agreement dated as of May 28, 2009 (together with all amendments thereto, the
Agreement), between Cenlar FSB (Bank) and CoreLogic Tax Services, LLC (CoreLogic).

I, Vicki Chenault, an authorized
officer of CoreLogic, certify to Bank and with the knowledge and intent that it will rely upon this certification, that:

1. The servicing
information required to be provided to Bank by CoreLogic under the Agreement has been so provided;

2. I am responsible for reviewing the
activities performed by CoreLogic under the Agreement and, based upon my knowledge and in all material respects throughout the relevant reporting period, CoreLogic has fulfilled its obligations under the Agreement.

3. Attached to this Servicer Compliance Certification is a list of all material failures and the nature and status thereof. [NONE/NO
ATTACHMENT]



|                            |  |                      
|--------------------------- |  | ---------------------
|CORELOGIC TAX SERVICES, LLC
|                            | 
|By:                         |  | /s/ Vicki Chenault   
|                            |  | Vicki Chenault       
|                            |  | Senior Vice President
|                            |  | February 11, 2016
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 10**  **- 6282** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,
v. GREGORY ALLEN OSBORNE , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Weste rn District of Virginia , at Abingdon
. James C. Turk, Senior District Judge. ( 1:07

- cr - 00057

- jct

- mfu

- 1; 1:09

- cv - 80146

- jct )

Submitted : July 22, 2010 Decided: August 2, 2010

Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and SHEDD , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un publi shed per curiam opinion
. Gregory Allen Osborne, Appellant Pro Se. Dennis H. Lee, COMMONWEALTH ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, Tazewell, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Gregory Allen Osborne seek s to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2010) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2006) . A certificate o f appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006)
. When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on pro cedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the r ecord and conclude that Osborne has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny Osborne’s motion for a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the fact s and legal contentions are adequately presented in the3 materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

# Army Stands Ready to Defend Korea, U.S. Army Pacific Commander Says

By xxxC. Todd LopezArmy News Service

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More Articles/News
#### § 162.474 What happens if the lessee abandons the leased premises?

If a lessee abandons the leased premises, we will treat the abandonment as a violation of the lease. The lease may specify a period of non-use after which the lease premises will be considered abandoned.
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 885

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to modify the average area

purchase price of residences taken into account under the qualified mortgage bond rules.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 1, 1999

Mr. BEREUTER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to modify

the average area purchase price of residences taken into

account under the qualified mortgage bond rules.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. MODIFICATION OF AVERAGE AREA PURCHASE

4 PRICE UNDER QUALIFIED MORTGAGE BOND

5 RULES.

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—The first sentence of section

7 143(e)(2) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating

8 to purchase price requirement) is amended—
2

•HR 885 IH

1 (1) by inserting ‘‘the greater of’’ before ‘‘the av2 erage purchase price’’, and

3 (2) by inserting before the period ‘‘or the maxi4 mum dollar amount limitation established pursuant

5 to section 203(b)(2)(A) of the National Housing Act

6 which applies to the area in which such residence is

7 located’’.

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

9 this section shall apply to financing provided after the date

10 of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

TRUSTEE FOR

SHEPARD LAND TRUST

, Appellant,

v.

ROCKET MORTGAGE LLC

, f/k/a QUICKEN LOANS, INC.,

STEFAN THOMPSON, NADINE THOMPSON,

HANNA DEVELOPMENT CORP d/b/a HANNA DEVELOPMENT

CORPORATION, SOCIETY HILL HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC.,

and CANNONGATE PROPERTY OWNER’S ASSOCIATION, INC.

, Appellee s

.

No. 4D2023

- 0432

[ December 21 , 2023 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm

Beach County; R ichard L. Oftedal, Senior Judge; L.T. Case No.

502019CA006028.

James R. Ackley of Law Offices of James R. Ackley , P.A. , West Palm

Beach, for appellant.

Ileen J

. Cantor of LOGS Legal Group, LLP, Boca Raton, for appellee,

Rocket Mortgage, LLC.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed

.

K LINGENSMITH

, C.J., G ROSS and L EVINE

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
#### Ex Parte Irvan A. Grubman.

No. 22736.

Delivered November 24, 1943.

Motion for Rehearing Overruled (Without Written Opinion) January 5, 1944.

The opinion states the case. .

*Howard Dailey,*of Dallas, for appellant.

*Spurgeon E. Bell,*State’s Attorney, of Austin, for the State.

GRAVES, Judge.

The relator filed his application for writ of habeas corpus in the Criminal District Court No. 2 of Dallas County, alleging that he was illegally restrained of his liberty by the sheriff of Dallas County, Texas.

*501There is no statement of facts, nor are there any bills of ex-, ceptions, accompanying the record. The order of the court remanding the relator to the custody of the sheriff of Dallas County recites that the court examined the writ of habeas corpus and the return made thereon by the sheriff of Dallas County, together with all papers and documents attached to the return, and that the court heard the testimony offered by each side, and that it appeared the relator was held by the sheriff of Dallas County for the authorities of Nolan County to answer an indictment charging the relator with forgery and knowingly passing a forged instrument. The' relator was admitted to appearance bond in the amount of $750.00, and remanded to custody pending the making of such bond. No attack is made on the amount of the bond fixed.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Avalon Holdings Corporation on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Timothy C. Coxson, Chief Financial Officer of Avalon Holdings Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Avalon Holdings Corporation.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Timothy C. Coxson  
|Timothy C. Coxson      
|Chief Financial Officer
|August 10, 2006        



24
#### § 11.609 Determination of paternity and support.

The Court of Indian Offenses shall have jurisdiction of all suits brought to determine the paternity of a child and to obtain a judgment for the support of the child. A judgment of the court establishing the identity of the father of the child shall be conclusive of that fact in all subsequent determinations of inheritance by the Court of Indian Offenses or by the Department of the Interior.
Exhibit 32.1

                Certifications Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
                             as Adopted Pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

The undersigned, the Principal Executive Officer (CEO) and the Principal
Financial Officer (Chief Operating Officer) of Millenia Hope Inc. (the
"Company"), each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his
knowledge on the date hereof:

(a)   The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q SB of the Company for the period ended
      May 31, 2006, filed on the date hereof with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(b)   Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.


Date: July 5, 2006
                                                 /s/ Leonard Stella
                                                -------------------------------
                                                Leonard Stella
                                                CEO
                                                (Principal Executive Officer)


Date: July 5, 2006
                                                 /s/ Hugo Valente
                                                 -------------------------------
                                                Hugo Valente
                                                CFO
                                                (Chief Financial Officer)

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed
by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended.
```

                                  Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the quarterly  filing of Meier Worldwide  Intermedia  Inc., a
Nevada  corporation (the  "Company"),  on Form 10-QSB for the period ended July
31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange  Commission  (the "Report"),
I, James Meier,  Chief Executive  Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.ss.1350), that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

October 22, 2003

By:/s/ James Meier
   James Meier, President, CEO and Chief Accounting Officer
```
RIDGEWOOD ELECTRIC POWER TRUST V
                                Exhibit 32.2
                                ------------
                          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                           18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                           AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I,  Christopher  Naunton,  Chief Financial  Officer of Ridgewood  Electric Power
Trust  V.  (the   "Registrant"),certify,   pursuant   to  Section   906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Registrant for the period ended
September 30, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.78m or
78o(d)); and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: January 19, 2004

                                       Signature:

                                       /s/ Christopher Naunton
                                       --------------------------------
                                       Christopher Naunton
                                       Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1





March 12, 2020


Via EDGAR


Securities and Exchange Commission


100 F Street, N.E.


Washington, D.C. 20549





Re: Certification pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350)





Ladies and Gentlemen:





In connection with the Annual Report of SandRidge Mississippian Trust II (the “Trust”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, not in its individual capacity but solely as the Trustee of the Trust, certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, that to its knowledge:





(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.





The above certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.








By:/s/ SARAH NEWELLSarah NewellVice President The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as Trustee of SandRidge Mississippian Trust II
### §10145. Ready Reserve: placement in

(a) Each person required under law to serve in a reserve component shall, upon becoming a member, be placed in the Ready Reserve of his armed force for his prescribed term of service, unless he is transferred to the Standby Reserve under section 10146(a) of this title.

(b) The units and members of the Army National Guard of the United States and of the Air National Guard of the United States are in the Ready Reserve of the Army and the Ready Reserve of the Air Force, respectively.

(c) All Reserves assigned to units organized to serve as units and designated as units in the Ready Reserve are in the Ready Reserve.

(d) Under such regulations as the Secretary concerned may prescribe, any qualified member of a reserve component or any qualified retired enlisted member of a regular component may, upon his request, be placed in the Ready Reserve. However, a member of the Retired Reserve entitled to retired pay or a retired enlisted member of a regular component may not be placed in the Ready Reserve unless the Secretary concerned makes a special finding that the member's services in the Ready Reserve are indispensable. The authority of the Secretary concerned under the preceding sentence may not be delegated—

(1) to a civilian officer or employee of the military department concerned below the level of Assistant Secretary; or

(2) to a member of the armed forces below the level of the lieutenant general or vice admiral in an armed force with responsibility for military personnel policy in that armed force.

(Added Pub. L. 103–337, div. A, title XVI, §1661(a)(1), Oct. 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 2973; amended Pub. L. 108–136, div. A, title V, §513, Nov. 24, 2003, 117 Stat. 1460.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

Provisions similar to those in this section were contained in section 269(a)–(d) of this title, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 103–337, §1661(a)(2)(A).

#### Amendments

2003—Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 108–136 substituted last sentence of introductory provisions and pars. (1) and (2) for "The Secretary concerned may not delegate his authority under the preceding sentence."

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Dec. 1, 1994, except as otherwise provided, see section 1691 of Pub. L. 103–337, set out as a note under section 10001 of this title.
#### Richard Schubert, an Infant, by August Schubert, His Guardian ad Litem, Respondent, *v.*C. S. Buell Company, Appellant.

Judgment and order unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Jenks, Hooker, Gaynor, Rich and Miller, JJ.
Exhibit 23.1





CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM ENGINEERS AND GEOLOGISTS





We hereby consent to the use by SandRidge Mississippian Trust II (the “Trust”) of our name and to the inclusion of information taken from the reports listed below in the Trust’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 201 8 , filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) on or about March 14 , 201 9 , including any amendments thereto:





December 31, 201 8 , SandRidge Mississippian Trust II Interest in Certain Properties located in Kansas and Oklahoma — SEC Price Case


December 31, 201 7 , SandRidge Mississippian Trust II Interest in Certain Properties located in Kansas and Oklahoma — SEC Price Case


December 31, 201 6 , SandRidge Mississippian Trust II Interest in Certain Properties located in Kansas and Oklahoma — SEC Price Case





CAWLEY, GILLESPIE & ASSOCIATES, INC.By:/s/ J. Zane MeekinsJ. Zane MeekinsExecutive Vice President





Fort Worth, Texas


March 14 , 201 9