alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 3 (Thursday, January 5, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 551]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-33820]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Surface Transportation Board


Release of Waybill Data

    The Surface Transportation Board has received a request from 
Neville Peterson LLP on behalf of Trinity Industries, Inc. (WB605-8-12/
20/11) for permission to use certain data from the Board's 2009 Carload 
Waybill Sample. A copy of this request may be obtained from the Office 
of Economics.
    The waybill sample contains confidential railroad and shipper data; 
therefore, if any parties object to these requests, they should file 
their objections with the Director of the Board's Office of Economics 
within 14 calendar days of the date of this notice. The rules for 
release of waybill data are codified at 49 CFR 1244.9.
    Contact: Scott Decker, (202) 245-0330.

Jeffrey Herzig,
Clearance Clerk.
[FR Doc. 2011-33820 Filed 1-4-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915-01-P
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF WASHINGTON, ) No. 80303-4-I

)

 Respondent, )

)

 v. ) UNPUBLISHED OPINION

)

LISA CHRISTINE TAUSE, )

) 

 Appellant. )

 PER CURIAM — Lisa Tause appeals her felony conviction for violation of a 

no-contact order. She contends, and the State concedes, that the information was 

constitutionally insufficient because it failed to include an essential element of the offense,

namely that Tause “willfully” violated the protection order.1 We accept the State's 

concession and reverse and dismiss Tause’s conviction without prejudice. We decline to 

address Tause’s remaining claims as they are now moot. 

 Reversed and dismissed without prejudice. 

FOR THE COURT:

 1 State v. Clowes, 104 Wn. App. 935, 944, 18 P.3d 596 (2001), disapproved of on other 

grounds by State v. Nonog, 169 Wn.2d 220, 237 P.3d 250 (2010).
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

# Air Defense and Airspace Management Cell shelter training

By Courtesy Story210th Field Artillery Brigade

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

news

pacom

South Korea
§ 162.251 What will BIA do in the event of a violation under an agricultural lease? ( a ) If we determine that an agricultural lease has been violated, we will send the tenant and its sureties a notice of violation within five business days of that determination. The notice of violation must be provided by certified mail, return receipt requested.
( b ) Within ten business days of the receipt of a notice of violation, the tenant must: ( 1 ) Cure the violation and notify us in writing that the violation has been cured;
( 2 ) Dispute our determination that a violation has occurred and/or explain why we should not cancel the lease; or
( 3 ) Request additional time to cure the violation.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# 18th Maintenance Group Wins AF Level Daedalian Award 

By Senior Airman Gary Hilton18th Wing Public Affairs

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More
§ 1000.249 What is the Secretary's role in a construction program in an AFA? The Secretary has the following role regarding a construction program contained in an AFA: ( a ) Except as provided in § 1000.256, the Secretary may review and approve planning and design documents in accordance with terms negotiated in the AFA to ensure health and safety standards and compliance with Federal law and other program mandates;
( b ) Unless otherwise agreed to in an AFA, the Secretary reserves a royalty-free, nonexclusive, and irrevocable license to reproduce, publish, or otherwise use for Federal Government purposes, designs produced in the construction program that are funded by AFA monies, including: ( 1 ) The copyright to any work developed under a contract or subcontract; and
( 2 ) Any rights of copyright that an Indian Tribe/Consortium or a Tribal contractor purchases through the AFA;
( c ) The Secretary may conduct on-site monitoring visits as negotiated in the AFA;
( d ) The Secretary must approve any proposed changes in the construction program or activity that require an increase in the negotiated AFA funding amount or an increase in the negotiated performance period or are a significant departure from the scope or objective of the construction program as agreed to in the AFA;
( e ) The Secretary may conduct final project inspection jointly with the Indian Tribe/Consortium and may accept the construction project or activity as negotiated in the AFA;
( f ) Where the Secretary and the Tribe/Consortium share construction program activities, the AFA may provide for the exchange of information;
( g ) The Secretary may reassume the construction portion of an AFA if there is a finding of: ( 1 ) A significant failure to substantially carry out the terms of the AFA without good cause; or
( 2 ) Imminent jeopardy to a physical trust asset, to a natural resource, or that adversely affects public health and safety as provided in subpart M of this part.
**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C.  SECTION 1350**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of General Metals Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended January 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Stephen Parent, the President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1)           the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)           the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Dated: March 22, 2007.

 

/s/ Stephen Parent                                                          

Stephen Parent

President and Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)

 

 

CW1124034.1
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

# Red Flag Alaska 23-2 Kicks 0ff Soon to Enhance Multinational Interoperability 

Pacific Air Forces Public Affairs

JOINT BASE PEARL HARBOR-HICKAM, Hawaii -- Red Flag-Alaska 23-2, a Pacific Air Forces-sponsored exercise, is scheduled to begin on June 12 with primary flight operations over the Joint Pacific Alaska Range Complex and is scheduled to run through June 23, 2023. Red Flag-Alaska is designed to provide realistic training in a simulated combat environment.Approximately 2,000 service members are expected to fly, maintain and support more than 70 aircraft from 32 units during this iteration of the exercise. In addition to the U.S., service members from the Japan Air Self-Defense Force and Republic of Korea Air Force are scheduled to participate, enabling them to exchange tactics, techniques and procedures while improving interoperability with fellow Airmen. Most aircraft will be based at, and fly from, Eielson Air Force Base and Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson, Alaska.Red Flag-Alaska exercises provide unique opportunities to integrate various forces in a realistic threat environment and dates back to 1975, when it was held at Clark Air Base, Philippines, and was called Exercise Cope Thunder.

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

# Exercise Northern Edge 2015 to Begin June 15

By Release Number: 030515

                JOINT BASE ELMENDORF-RICHARDSON, Alaska  –              http://www.jber.af.mil/jparc.aspwww.goaeis.com

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More News/Articles
#### Ervin A. GIBB, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.

No. 15162.

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.

Oct. 19, 1954.

Ervin A. Gibb, in pro. per.

Frank M. Johnson, Jr., U. S. Atty., M. Lewis Gwathney, Asst. U. S. Atty., Birmingham, Ala., Fred S. Weaver, Asst. U. S. Atty., Double Springs, Ala., for appellee.

Before BORAH, RIVES and TUTTLE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Upon the authority of Reed v. United States, 5 Cir., 142 F.2d 435 and Hamilton v. United States, 4 Cir., 204 F.2d 927, the judgment in the above styled case is affirmed.
# C_2013240EN.01000302.xml

| 21.8.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 240/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.8.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 240/3

---

Notification of the Czech Republic Government pursuant to Article 10(2) of Directive 2009/73/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (‘Gas Directive’) concerning common rules for the internal market in natural gas regarding the designation of NET4GAS s.r.o. as transmission system operator in the Czech Republic — Gas TSO

2013/C 240/04

Following the Czech Republic regulatory authority's final decision of 28 January 2013 regarding the certification of NET4GAS s.r.o. as independent transmission operator (Chapter IV of the Gas Directive), the Czech Republic has notified to the Commission the official approval and designation of this company as a transmission system operator operating in the Czech Republic in accordance with Article 10 of the Gas Directive.

Any additional information can be obtained from:

| Ministry of Industry and Trade |
| --- |
| Na Františku 32 |
| 110 15 Praha 1 |
| ČESKÁ REPUBLIKA |
| http://www.mpo.cz |

Ministry of Industry and Trade

Na Františku 32

110 15 Praha 1

ČESKÁ REPUBLIKA

http://www.mpo.cz

---
Exhibit
32.2


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO




18
U.S.C.  SECTION 1350




AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO




SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of General Metals Corporation (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q /A No. 2 for the period ended
January 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the “Report”), I, Daniel J. Forbush, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:




(1)           the
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)           the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




Dated:
January 15, 2010






/S/ Daniel J.
Forbush


Daniel J.
Forbush


Chief
Financial Officer


(Principal
Financial Officer and
Principal Accounting Officer)
§ 115.604 When will BIA authorize OTFM to place a restriction on your IIM account? BIA will authorize OTFM to place a restriction on your IIM account after providing OTFM with supporting documentation (i.e., receipts, notice of publication, etc.) of the following: ( a ) Five (5) days after the date BIA mails you or your guardian, as applicable, notice of its decision to restrict your account by United States certified mail to your address of record;
( b ) One (1) day after BIA has made personal delivery to you or your guardian, as applicable, or to your address of record of its notice of the BIA's decision to restrict your account; or
( c ) Five (5) days after the fourth publication of the public notice of BIA's decision to restrict your account.
#### § 6.2 Analytical subject indexes.

Analytical subject indexes covering the contents of the Federal Register shall be published as currently as practicable and shall be cumulated and separately published at least once each calendar year.
# C_2013018EN.01000501.xml

| 22.1.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 18/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.1.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 18/5

---

Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries

2013/C 18/06

In accordance with Article 35(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), a decision has been taken to close the fishery as set down in the following table:

1

| Date and time of closure | 20.12.2012 |
| --- | --- |
| Duration | 20.12.2012-31.12.2012 |
| Member State | Germany |
| Stock or group of stocks | SPR/3BCD-C |
| Species | Sprat and associated catches (Sprattus sprattus) |
| Zone | EU waters of subdivisions 22-32 |
| Type(s) of fishing vessels | — |
| Reference number | FS86BAL |

Date and time of closure

20.12.2012

Duration

20.12.2012-31.12.2012

Member State

Germany

Stock or group of stocks

SPR/3BCD-C

Species

Sprat and associated catches (Sprattus sprattus)

Sprattus sprattus

Zone

EU waters of subdivisions 22-32

Type(s) of fishing vessels

—

Reference number

FS86BAL

---

(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.

1

---
----

|                          |
|--------------------------|
|                          |  |
| 001-10315                | 63-0860407 |
| (Commission File Number) | (IRS Employer Identification No.) |
|                     |   |

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |
| ¨ | Written communication pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425) |
|   |   |
| ¨ | Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12) |
|   |   |
| ¨ | Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b)) |
|   |   |
| ¨ | Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c)) |

----

----

|     |                                           |
|-----|-------------------------------------------|
| (a) | Financial Statements of Business Acquired |

|     |                                 |
|-----|---------------------------------|
| (b) | Pro Forma Financial Information |

|     |          |
|-----|----------|
| (d) | Exhibits |

----

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |  |
|   |   |   |
| By:    | /S/   JOHN P. WHITTINGTON |
|   | Name: | John P. Whittington |
|   | Title: | Executive Vice President, General Counseland Corporate Secretary |

----

|                |
|----------------|
|                |  |
| Exhibit Number | Description of Exhibit |
| 23.1           | Consent of BKD, LLP. |
| 99.1           | Audited consolidated balance sheet of Reliant as of December 31, 2014 and the related audited consolidated statements of operations, members' deficit, and cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2014, together with the notes thereto and the auditor’s report thereon. |
| 99.2           | Unaudited consolidated balance sheet of Reliant as of September 30, 2015 and the related unaudited interim condensed consolidated statements of operations, members' (deficit) equity, and cash flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014. |
| 99.3           | Unaudited pro forma condensed combined balance sheet of HealthSouth as of September 30, 2015 and the unaudited pro forma condensed combined statements of operations for the year ended December 31, 2014 and the nine months ended September 30, 2015. |
#### Dorothy Jensen, appellant, v. Western Printing Company, appellee.

227 N. W. 2d 839

Filed April 10, 1975.

No. 39711.

S. Caporale of Shrout, Caporale, Krieger, Christian & Nestle, for appellant.

Pilcher, Howard & Dustin, for appellee.

Heard before Spencer, McCown, and Newton, JJ., Hamilton, District Judge, and Kuns, Retired District Judge.

Kuns, Retired District Judge.

This is a workmen’s compensation case. An award by a single judge was appealed to the District Court for Douglas County, Nebraska, rehearing being waived. The District Court, after hearing and considering evidence, found that the plaintiff should be awarded com*482pensation for temporary total disability from April 28, 1970, to May 6, 1971, and for 25 percent permanent partial disability thereafter, affirming the previous award. The plaintiff appeals to this court. We affirm the judgment of the District Court.

The record shows that the appellant had been employed by the appellee since September 1969, performing unskilled work; she operated various types of machines incidental to the printing business and performed other tasks involving stooping, bending, and the lifting and carrying of heavy objects. On April 27, 1970, while moving a box from a “heat seal” table to a stack of boxes on a skid, the appellant felt something snap in her back and fell to one knee. The appellant was hospitalized immediately and given medical treatment for a lumbar condition. After a period of conservative treatment, exploratory surgery was performed on November 5, 1970; although no extruded disk material was revealed, the disk was opened and degenerative material removed. The appellant then received physical therapy out-patient treatment until May 6, 1971. Dr. Klein then released the appellant to return to work, with the recommendation that she avoid prolonged bending or heavy lifting. The appellant applied for work to the appellee and to several others but did not secure further employment. Her complaints of pain continued and further medical examinations of her were made at intervals up until the time of trial. Some testimony indicates that the appellant was suffering psychologically. Each of the medical experts was questioned about this and each stated that he considered both her psychological condition as well as her physical condition in forming an opinion as to the extent of her disability. The maximum disability stated was 25 percent; the trial court found this amount of permanent partial disability.

Both sides argue the facts and the law relating to a determination of the existence of total or partial disability. The record, however, contains reasonable com*483petent testimony to support the findings and judgment of the trial court. A trial de novo in this court, therefore, is not justified. Quincy v. J & S of Nebraska, Inc., 191 Neb. 208, 214 N. W. 2d 498; Chester v. Douglas County, 192 Neb. 666, 223 N. W. 2d 491.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Affirmed.