alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Ella Norton, Respondent, v. Ithaca Street Railway Company, Appellant, Impleaded with the City of Ithaca.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs; No' opinion. All concurred, except Kellogg, J., dissenting.
#### § 166.405 Whose grazing rental rate will be applicable for a permit on individually-owned Indian land?

The following grazing rental rate schedule will apply for individually-owned Indian land:

| If you are * * * | Then you will pay * * * |
| --- | --- |
| (a) Grazing livestock on Individually-owned Indian land | The rate set by the BIA or by the individual Indian landowner and approved by us. |
| (b) The successful bidder for use of any of these specific parcels of Indian land | Your rental rate bid, but not less than the minimum bid rate advertised, unless the permit is granted at less than fair annual rental under § 166.403. |
| (c) The recipient of an allocation from a bid unit | The bid rate or the appraised rate, whichever is higher. |
# C_2017378EN.01049401.xml

| 9.11.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 378/494 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.11.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 378/494

---

P7_TA(2014)0214

EU-Azerbaijan Agreement on the facilitation of the issuance of visas ***

European Parliament legislative resolution of 12 March 2014 on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of the Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Azerbaijan on the facilitation of the issuance of visas (17846/2013 — C7-0078/2014 — 2013/0356(NLE))

(Consent)

(2017/C 378/57)

The European Parliament,

The European Parliament

| — | having regard to the draft Council decision (17846/2013), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the draft Council decision (17846/2013),

| — | having regard to the draft Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Azerbaijan on the facilitation of the issuance of visas (15554/2013), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the draft Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Azerbaijan on the facilitation of the issuance of visas (15554/2013),

| — | having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Article 77(2)(a) and Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (a), of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C7-0078/2014), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Article 77(2)(a) and Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (a), of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C7-0078/2014),

| — | having regard to Rule 81(1), first and third subparagraphs, Rule 81(2), and Rule 90(7) of its Rules of Procedure, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Rule 81(1), first and third subparagraphs, Rule 81(2), and Rule 90(7) of its Rules of Procedure,

| — | having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs and the opinion of the Committee on Foreign Affairs (A7-0155/2014), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs and the opinion of the Committee on Foreign Affairs (A7-0155/2014),

| 1. | Consents to the conclusion of the Agreement; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Consents to the conclusion of the Agreement;

| 2. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States and the Republic of Azerbaijan. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States and the Republic of Azerbaijan.

---
# C_2013216EN.01003101.xml

| 30.7.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 216/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.7.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 216/31

---

Reorganisation Measures

Decision regarding a reorganisation measure for ‘International Union Insurances SA’

(Publication made in accordance with Article 6 of Directive 2001/17/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the reorganisation and winding-up of insurance undertakings)

2013/C 216/08

| Insurance undertaking | International Union Insurances SA, based at Ilia Iliou 66 11764 Athens, Company Registration No 12836/Β/05/1986, Tax No 094058455, and legally represented by Andreas Valiraki, Chairman of the company's Management Board. |
| --- | --- |
| Date, entry into force and type of decision | Decision No 80/3/28.6.2013 of the Committee for Credit and Insurance Matters of the Bank of Greece on the prohibition of the free disposal (freezing) of all existing bound and free assets held by International Union Insurances SA at the time the Decision is adopted and all bound and free financial resources held by the company whether in Greece or abroad. Furthermore, all the company’s insurance business, covering all its activities in all insurance sectors, are suspended.
  Entry into force: 28.6.2013
  Expiry date: 15.7.2013 |
| Competent authority | Bank of Greece |
| Eleftheriou Venizelou 21 |
| 102 50 Αθήνα/Athens |
| ΕΛΛΑΔΑ/GREECE |

Insurance undertaking

International Union Insurances SA, based at Ilia Iliou 66 11764 Athens, Company Registration No 12836/Β/05/1986, Tax No 094058455, and legally represented by Andreas Valiraki, Chairman of the company's Management Board.

Date, entry into force and type of decision

Decision No 80/3/28.6.2013 of the Committee for Credit and Insurance Matters of the Bank of Greece on the prohibition of the free disposal (freezing) of all existing bound and free assets held by International Union Insurances SA at the time the Decision is adopted and all bound and free financial resources held by the company whether in Greece or abroad. Furthermore, all the company’s insurance business, covering all its activities in all insurance sectors, are suspended.

Entry into force: 28.6.2013

Expiry date: 15.7.2013

Competent authority

Bank of Greece

Eleftheriou Venizelou 21

102 50 Αθήνα/Athens

ΕΛΛΑΔΑ/GREECE

Supervisory authority

| Bank of Greece |
| --- |
| Eleftheriou Venizelou 21 |
| 102 50 Αθήνα/Athens |
| ΕΛΛΑΔΑ/GREECE |

Bank of Greece

Eleftheriou Venizelou 21

102 50 Αθήνα/Athens

ΕΛΛΑΔΑ/GREECE

Administrator appointed

Applicable law

Greek law in accordance with Articles 9 and 17c of Legislative Decree No 400/1970

---
§ 1000.140 How does the Secretary determine the amount of indirect contract support costs? The Secretary determines the amount of indirect contract support costs by: ( a ) Applying the negotiated indirect cost rate to the appropriate direct cost base;
( b ) Using the provisional rate; or
( c ) Negotiating the amount of indirect contract support.
#### § 101.6 Office of National Drug Control Policy.

Freedom of Information regulations for the Office of National Drug Control Policy appear at 21 CFR parts 1400-1499.

[55 FR 46037, Nov. 1, 1990]
|   | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and, |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the Report. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: December 20, 2010 | By:    | /s/ Daniel J. Forbush,                                   |   |
|-------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                    |   | Daniel J. Forbush,                                            |   |
|                    |   | Chief Financial Officer                                       |   |
|                    |   | (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer |
### Regulatory Evaluation Docket No. FAA- Dir ectorate Identifi e r: -AD 

### / fy ou make 

### cha11ges to th e mlues 

### i11tht! tab l e 

### be ltPrF . you must ens ure 

### tile totals update 

### accord ingly. If 

### t111!y do not, click (or Ta b) iuto und then out o.fi!le changed cell. Estimated Co s ts: Action Cost s per Product (e.g., airc r aft, engine , (e.g., In spection , prop e ller, appli ance) Work - hours Labor Parts Co s t Total Cost s Number of Tot a l Cost replacement) (i n cl ude cost ( lab or + 

## u.s. for U.S. Fleet 

### Do no/ include on - condition costs here acce ss, testing, ( @$ 85/h part s) Regis tered and close-up) our) Pro d uct s Op e n Access 10.0 .) {' $0 ;.::; 00 

### 15 t2,7S.) 

## oo Clean and App ly 1- ( I () Reinforcing 16.0 

## so ... ; t 

### 15

**~** t Ov ercoat Clo se Acce ss 10.0 ,. (J tl I $0
... i ) ., 

### 15 1').7"() (J(J

**~** I) (; ( /l(l {' .0• j


### . ( n: I) (II) 0 (l()

•J 

### or ,,,,)(1 0 1)0 (I,()( 

### ' ljn(} t (H) l)(;: (l ( •(1 01)0 (• (){ 

### 01} .,

**I~** IHl O.Oi (I l(l :;. tG. I) \10 •) ()( 0 0(1 .-. (I ()(I

**~·m** (J •(J \ I'• (It I 'hi (I 0( 1 Cl)r {1,0( '_l(ltj <., 1) ()I)

**~** •}_()' (_ i(l

. '> {) 1)1 I

**~~.o.** 

### 1J 

## on 1\ (ll 

# " 10 (l

**~l(l** ( 1)1

**~ ~·**  

## (: 1J \H) 0 {ltl {, (I ll( l Otl' The known number of product s in compliance: Total Co s t s of comp li ance for 

### U .S. fle et: $45,900 Costs covered under warranty 

### ( i f known) $ On- Co ndition Costs: Action Work-hours Labor cost Parts Cost Co st per Product (e.g., In spec tion , (include access, (@$85/hour)

rep lacement) te sting, and closeup) 

### 'S 0 Oll 

### h 

### non

**~** I ( ;. '\ I .l'O 

### h oJl

**~** 0 . (}() 'j; ( l . !.O

### Special considerations for Economic Analysis (Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used t o explain warranty costs): 

### Executive Order 12866: Could th e AD be considered a "s i g nific ant regulato1y



# action"? **~** YES* 

# 0 NO [gj *Explanation: 

### DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures: I s the AD s ignific ant? - ' YES* 

# 0 NO [gj *Exp lanati on : 

### Regulatory Flexibility Act: Will the AD have a s ignifi cant economic impact on a substantial number of s mall entiti es? E xp lain for either a Yes or No answer .• . YES 

# 0 NO[gj Ex planation: 

### Intrastate Aviation in Alaska: This AD could aff ect intra s tate aviation in Alaska. I s it appropriate to in c lude specific requirem ents for aircraft operated in Alaska w her e av iati on might be the only mod e of transportation?



# · Y ES* 

# 0 NO [gj *Explanati on:
§ 162.208 Who can represent the Indian landowners in negotiating or granting an agricultural lease? The following individuals or entities may represent an individual Indian landowner: ( a ) An adult with custody acting on behalf of his or her minor children;
( b ) A guardian, conservator, or other fiduciary appointed by a court of competent jurisdiction to act on behalf of an individual Indian landowner;
( c ) An adult or legal entity who has been given a written power of attorney that: ( 1 ) Meets all of the formal requirements of any applicable tribal or state law;
( 2 ) Identifies the attorney-in-fact and the land to be leased; and
( 3 ) Describes the scope of the power granted and any limits thereon.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

# Tucson Visits Singapore during Western Pacific Deployment

By Lt. j.g. Tony MeyerUSS Tucson Public Affairs Officer

                CHANGI NAVAL BASE, Singapore  –              

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT
----

----

| 1. | The      Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of      1934, as amended; and |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.  | The      information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of      the LP. |
|----------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: August 4, 2008                                                                                                        |   |   |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|
|                                                                                                                             |   |   |
| /s/      Mark Gatto                                                                                                              |   |   |
| Mark      Gatto                                                                                                                  |   |   |
| Co-Chief      Executive Officer and Co-PresidentICON      Capital Corp.General      Partner of ICON Income Fund Eight AL.P. |
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-1583

MICHAEL SCHMIDT; DEBORAH BARKER,

Plaintiffs - Appellants,

v.

WELLS FARGO HOME MORTGAGE, a division of WELLS FARGO BANK, 

N.A.,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, Chief 

District Judge. (3:11-cv-00059-JRS)

Submitted: October 23, 2012 Decided: October 31, 2012

Before WILKINSON, SHEDD, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jimmy Ray Howell, Jr., JR HOWELL & ASSOCIATES, Washington, D.C., 

for Appellants. John C. Lynch, Ethan G. Ostroff, TROUTMAN 

SANDERS, LLP, Virginia Beach, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Michael Schmidt and Deborah Barker filed a complaint 

and amended complaint against Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, seeking 

to assert, inter alia, claims for fraud and claims under the 

Fair Debt Collection Practices Act and the Virginia Consumer 

Protection Act. The district court dismissed the complaint 

pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6), concluding that Schmidt 

and Barker failed to state a claim for relief. We have reviewed 

the record and the briefs filed by the parties, and we find no 

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated 

by the district court. Schmidt v. Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, 

No. 3:11-cv-00059-JRS (E.D. Va. Apr. 26, 2011). We dispense 

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before the court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
### Geology and ore deposits of the Belo Horizonte, Ibirite, and Macacos quadrangles, Minas Gerais, Brazil

By: J.B. Pomerene

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/pp341D

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 3**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 4**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 5**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 6**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 7**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 8**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 9**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 10**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 11**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 12**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 13**                            (pdf) 
- Superseded Publications:
                                        Preliminary geologic maps of the Belo Horizonte, Ibirite, and Macacos quadrangles, Minas Gerais, Brazil(1959)                                    

- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Somsak Chivavibul,
certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period
covered by this report on Form 10-K of SLM Student Loan Trust 2012-2 (the Exchange Act periodic reports);

2. Based on my
knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing
and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as
disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer and administrator have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreement and administration agreement, as applicable, in all material respects; and

5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on
assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this
report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K. In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by the following unaffiliated party: Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, as indenture trustee.

[Signature Page Follows]



---

Date: March 30, 2016



|                     
|---------------------
|/s/ SOMSAK CHIVAVIBUL
|Somsak Chivavibul    

President and Chief Financial Officer

(Senior Securitization Officer)

Navient Funding, LLC
Exhibit 33.2




Management’s Assertion on Compliance with Regulation AB


(Citibank, N.A.)




MANAGEMENT'S ASSERTION OF COMPLIANCE




Management of the Agency and Trust division of Citibank, N.A. (or “Company”) is responsible for assessing compliance with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission.
   Management has determined that the servicing criteria in Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB are applicable in regard to the servicing platform for the period as follows:
   Platform:  Publicly-issued (i.e., transaction-level reporting initially required under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) automobile loan or lease-backed securities serviced by Nissan Motor Acceptance Corporation issued on or after January 1, 2006 for which the Company provides trustee and paying agent services (the “Platform”).
  Applicable Servicing Criteria:  All servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d), to the extent required by Item 1122(d) servicing criteria in regards to the activities performed by the Company with respect to the Platform as to any transaction, except for the following criteria: 1122(d)(1)(i)-1122(d)(1)(iv), 1122(d)(2)(i), 1122(d)(2)(iii), 1122(d)(2)(v)-1122(d)(2)(vii), 1122(d)(3)(i) and 1122(d)(4)(i)-1122(d)(4)(xv), which management has determined are not applicable to the activities the Company performs with respect to the Platform (the “Applicable Servicing Criteria”).  With respect to the Platform, servicing criterion 1122(d)(3)(ii) is applicable only as it relates to remittances.
  Period:  Twelve months ended March 31, 2012 (the “Period”).
  With respect to the Platform as of and for the Period, the Company’s management provides the following assertion of compliance with respect to the Applicable Servicing Criteria:
  ·
The Company’s management is responsible for assessing the Company’s compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.
  ·
The Company’s management has assessed the Company’s compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.  In making this assessment, management used the criteria set forth by the Securities and Exchange Commission in paragraph (d) of Item 1122 of Regulation AB.
  ·
Based on such assessment, the Company has complied, in all material respects, with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.
  KPMG LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report with respect to management’s assertion of compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria as of and for the Period.
  CITIBANK, N.A.
   By:  /s/ Karen Montbach
   Its:   Managing Director
  Dated: May 25, 2012