alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

# Pacific Surface Action Group and Australia Participate In Exchange Program 

By Mass Communication Specialist 3rd Class Gerald Dudley ReynoldsUSS Decatur Public Affairs

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More Articles/News
#### Morris Jacoby and Seymour Bookman, Appellants, v. The Trust Company of America, as Executor of Simon M. Simpson, Deceased, Respondent.

Order modified by providing that the relief granted is upon condition that defendant pay all costs of the action to the date of the order and ten dollars costs of the motion, and as so modified affirmed, without costs. Ho. opinion. Settle.order on notice,
### §1150. Affiliation with Guard and Reserve units: waiver of certain limitations

(a) Preference for Certain Persons.—A person who is separated from the armed forces during the period beginning on October 1, 1990, and ending on December 31, 2001, and who applies to become a member of a National Guard or Reserve unit within one year after the date of such separation shall be given preference over other equally qualified applicants for existing or projected vacancies within the unit to which the member applies.

(b) Limited Waiver of Strength Limitations.—Under regulations prescribed by the Secretary of Defense, a person covered by subsection (a) who enters a National Guard or Reserve unit pursuant to an application described in such subsection may be retained in that unit for up to three years without regard to reserve-component strength limitations so long as the individual maintains good standing in that unit.

(c) Coast Guard.—This section shall apply to the Coast Guard in the same manner and to the same extent as it applies to the Department of Defense. The Secretary of Homeland Security shall prescribe regulations to implement this section for the Coast Guard when it is not operating as a service in the Navy.

(Added Pub. L. 101–510, div. A, title V, §502(a)(1), Nov. 5, 1990, 104 Stat. 1557; amended Pub. L. 102–484, div. A, title V, §514, Oct. 23, 1992, 106 Stat. 2406; Pub. L. 103–160, div. A, title V, §561(j), Nov. 30, 1993, 107 Stat. 1668; Pub. L. 103–337, div. A, title V, §542(a)(9), Oct. 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 2768; Pub. L. 105–261, div. A, title V, §561(p), Oct. 17, 1998, 112 Stat. 2027; Pub. L. 106–398, §1 [[div. A], title V, §571(o)], Oct. 30, 2000, 114 Stat. 1654, 1654A–135; Pub. L. 107–296, title XVII, §1704(b)(1), Nov. 25, 2002, 116 Stat. 2314; Pub. L. 112–239, div. A, title X, §1076(f)(18), Jan. 2, 2013, 126 Stat. 1952.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2013—Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 112–239 inserted "when it is not operating as a service in the Navy" after "for the Coast Guard".

2002—Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 107–296 substituted "of Homeland Security" for "of Transportation".

2000—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 106–398 substituted "December 31, 2001" for "September 30, 2001".

1998—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 105–261 substituted "during the period beginning on October 1, 1990, and ending on September 30, 2001" for "during the nine-year period beginning on October 1, 1990".

1994—Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 103–337 added subsec. (c).

1993—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 103–160 substituted "nine-year period" for "five-year period".

1992—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 102–484 struck out "involuntarily" after "who is".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2002 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 107–296 effective on the date of transfer of the Coast Guard to the Department of Homeland Security, see section 1704(g) of Pub. L. 107–296, set out as a note under section 101 of this title.

#### Effective Date of 1994 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 103–337 applicable only to members of the Coast Guard who are separated after Sept. 30, 1994, see section 542(e) of Pub. L. 103–337, set out as a note under section 1141 of this title.
### §2348. Inventories of supplies not to be increased

Inventories of supplies for elements of the armed forces may not be increased for the purpose of transferring supplies under the authority of this subchapter.

(Added Pub. L. 96–323, §2(a), Aug. 4, 1980, 94 Stat. 1018, §2328; amended Pub. L. 97–22, §11(a)(8), July 10, 1981, 95 Stat. 138; renumbered §2348, Pub. L. 99–145, title XIII, §1304(a)(1), Nov. 8, 1985, 99 Stat. 741; Pub. L. 99–661, div. A, title XI, §1104(e), Nov. 14, 1986, 100 Stat. 3965; Pub. L. 101–189, div. A, title IX, §931(e)(1), Nov. 29, 1989, 103 Stat. 1535.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1989—Pub. L. 101–189 substituted "this subchapter" for "this chapter".

1986—Pub. L. 99–661 struck out "to military forces of any North Atlantic Treaty Organization country or any North Atlantic Treaty Organization subsidiary body" after "chapter".

1985—Pub. L. 99–145 renumbered section 2328 of this title as this section.

1981—Pub. L. 97–22 substituted "this chapter" for "this Act".
§ 162.549 How much monetary compensation must be paid under a WSR lease of tribal land? ( a ) A WSR lease of tribal land may allow for any payment negotiated by the tribe, and we will defer to the tribe and not require a valuation if the tribe submits a tribal authorization expressly stating that it: ( 1 ) Has negotiated compensation satisfactory to the tribe;
( 2 ) Waives valuation; and
( 3 ) Has determined that accepting such negotiated compensation and waiving valuation is in its best interest.
( b ) The tribe may request, in writing, that we determine fair market rental, in which case we will use a valuation in accordance with § 162.551. After providing the tribe with the fair market rental, we will defer to a tribe's decision to allow for any payment amount negotiated by the tribe.
( c ) If the conditions in paragraph (a) or (b) of this section are not met, we will require that the lease provide for fair market rental based on a valuation in accordance with § 162.551.
H. Res. 273

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

August 4, 1999.

Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule

XVIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee of the

Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of

the bill (H.R. 2670) making appropriations for the Departments of Commerce, Justice, and State, the Judiciary, and

related agencies for the fiscal year ending September 30,

2000, and for other purposes. The first reading of the bill

shall be dispensed with. Points of order against consideration

of the bill for failure to comply with clause 4 of rule XIII

and section 306 of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 are

waived. General debate shall be confined to the bill and shall

not exceed one hour equally divided and controlled by the

chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on

Appropriations. After general debate the bill shall be considered for amendment under the five-minute rule. Points of

order against provisions in the bill for failure to comply with

clause 2 of rule XXI are waived. The amendments printed in
2

•HRES 273 EH

the report of the Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution may be offered only by a Member designated in the

report and only at the appropriate point in the reading of the

bill, shall be considered as read, shall be debatable for the

time specified in the report equally divided and controlled by

the proponent and an opponent, and shall not be subject to

amendment. All points of order against the amendments

printed in the report are waived. During consideration of the

bill for amendment, the Chairman of the Committee of the

Whole may accord priority in recognition on the basis of

whether the Member offering an amendment has caused it to

be printed in the portion of the Congressional Record designated for that purpose in clause 8 of rule XVIII. Amendments so printed shall be considered as read. The Chairman

of the Committee of the Whole may: (1) postpone until a time

during further consideration in the Committee of the Whole

a request for a recorded vote on any amendment; and (2) reduce to five minutes the minimum time for electronic voting

on any postponed question that follows another electronic

vote without intervening business, provided that the minimum

time for electronic voting on the first in any series of questions shall be 15 minutes. During consideration of the bill,

points of order against amendments for failure to comply

with clause 2(e) of rule XXI are waived. At the conclusion

of consideration of the bill for amendment the Committee
3

•HRES 273 EH

shall rise and report the bill to the House with such amendments as may have been adopted. The previous question shall

be considered as ordered on the bill and amendments thereto

to final passage without intervening motion except one motion to recommit with or without instructions.

Attest:

Clerk.
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 131 (Tuesday, July 9, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 41183]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-16469]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 8375]

International Security Advisory Board (ISAB) Meeting Notice; 
Closed Meeting

    In accordance with section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App Sec.  10(a)(2), the Department of State 
announces a meeting of the International Security Advisory Board (ISAB) 
to take place on July 23, 2013, at the Department of State, Washington, 
DC.
    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 
U.S.C. App Sec.  10(d), and 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(1), it has been determined 
that this Board meeting will be closed to the public because the Board 
will be reviewing and discussing matters properly classified in 
accordance with Executive Order 13526. The purpose of the ISAB is to 
provide the Department with a continuing source of independent advice 
on all aspects of arms control, disarmament, political-military 
affairs, international security and related aspects of public 
diplomacy. The agenda for this meeting will include classified 
discussions related to the Board's studies on current U.S. policy and 
issues regarding arms control, international security, nuclear 
proliferation, and diplomacy.
    For more information, contact Richard W. Hartman II, Executive 
Director of the International Security Advisory Board, U. S. Department 
of State, Washington, DC 20520, telephone: (202) 736-4290.

    Dated: June 26, 2013.
Richard W. Hartman, II,
Executive Director, International Security Advisory Board, U.S. 
Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2013-16469 Filed 7-8-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-24-P
```
§ 19.2 Routing and approval of drafts. ( a ) A proposed Executive order or proclamation shall first be submitted, with seven copies thereof, to the Director of the Office of Management and Budget, together with a letter, signed by the head or other properly authorized officer of the originating Federal agency, explaining the nature, purpose, background, and effect of the proposed Executive order or proclamation and its relationship, if any, to pertinent laws and other Executive orders or proclamations.
( b ) If the Director of the Office of Management and Budget approves the proposed Executive order or proclamation, he shall transmit it to the Attorney General for his consideration as to both form and legality.
( c ) If the Attorney General approves the proposed Executive order or proclamation, he shall transmit it to the Director of the Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration: *Provided,* That in cases involving sufficient urgency the Attorney General may transmit it directly to the President: *And provided further,* That the authority vested in the Attorney General by this section may be delegated by him, in whole or in part, to the Deputy Attorney General, Solicitor General, or to such Assistant Attorney General as he may designate.
( d ) After determining that the proposed Executive order or proclamation conforms to the requirements of § 19.1 and is free from typographical or clerical error, the Director of the Office of the Federal Register shall transmit it and three copies thereof to the President.
( e ) If the proposed Executive order or proclamation is disapproved by the Director of the Office of Management and Budget or by the Attorney General, it shall not thereafter be presented to the President unless it is accompanied by a statement of the reasons for such disapproval.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News

III MEF and Republic of Korea Marines operate from USS Blue Ridge during Ulchi Freedom Shield 23August 29, 2023 — The command element of III Marine Expeditionary Force, with key leaders and planners from the Republic of Korea Marine Corps, embarked on the USS Blue Ridge for the final phase of Exercise Ulchi Freedom Shield 23... MORE 

----

U.S. and Indonesian Marines co-host Pacific SymposiumJuly 10, 2023 — The Commander of U.S. Marine Corps Forces, Pacific, Lt. Gen. William Jurney, and Indonesian Marine Corps Commandant, Maj. Gen. Nur Alamsyah, will co-host the 9th Pacific Amphibious Leaders Symposium in Bali, Indonesia, July 9-14... MORE 

----

2024 (327)2023 (825)2022 (1193)2021 (1066)2020 (1083)2019 (1166)2018 (1116)2017 (1356)2016 (1475)2015 (1408)2014 (904)2013 (32)2012 (4)

About DoDDoD CareersJoin the MilitaryNewsUSA.govPhotos & VideosPrivacy & SecurityTop Issues

US INDOPACOM Inspector GeneralDoD Inspector General Accessibility/Section 508DoD FOIAUS INDOPACOM FOIALink DisclaimerNo FEAR ActRecovery ActINDOPACOM Webmaster

                  - Facebook
                  - X
                  - YouTube
                  - Instagram
                  - RSS

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
#### Emmons County *vs.*Emma C. Cranmer, *et al.*

Opinion filed November 13, 1900.

(84 N. W. Rep. 1117.)

Appeal from District Court, Emmons County; *Winchester,*J.

*George M. Register*and *Cochrane & Corliss,*for appellant.

*Stevens & Allen,*for respondents.

Per Curiam.

The controlling questions in this case were involved and decided in the case of *Emmons Co.*v. *Thompson*(decided this term) 9 N. D. 598, 84 N. W. Rep. 385. The order appealed from is in all things reversed, and the District Court is directed to enter an order reversing the same, and also to enter an order denying- the application made herein to vacate said judgment and tax sale, with costs of both courts to appellant.
### M A N D A T E

TO THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO

. 2 of NUECES COUNTY, GREET INGS:

Before our Court of Appeals for the Thirteenth District of Texas, on the 22nd day of January, 2015, the cause upon appeal to revise or reverse your judgment between

The State Of Texas

, Appellant,

v.

Glenn Weightman a/k/a/ Glenn Wrightman Appellee.

CAUSE NO. 13

- 14

- 00652

- CR (Tr.Ct.No. 09CR5089

- 2)

was determined; and therein our said Court made its order in these words:

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on

appea l, concludes the appeal should be dismissed. The Court orders the appeal

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION in accordance with its opinion

.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

January 22, 2015.



WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court of Appeals for the Thirteenth District of Texas, in this behalf, and in all things have it duly recognized, obeyed and executed.

WITNESS, the Hon. Rogelio Valdez, Chief Justice of our Court of Appeals, with the seal thereof affixed, at the City of Edinburg, Texas this 7th day of April, 2015.

Dorian E. Ramirez, CLERK
§ 162.425 What form of monetary compensation payment is acceptable under a business lease? ( a ) When payments are made directly to Indian landowners, the form of payment must be acceptable to the Indian landowners.
( b ) When payments are made to us, our preferred method of payment is electronic funds transfer payments. We will also accept: ( 1 ) Money orders;
( 2 ) Personal checks;
( 3 ) Certified checks; or
( 4 ) Cashier's checks.
( c ) We will not accept cash or foreign currency.
( d ) We will accept third-party checks only from financial institutions or Federal agencies.
**Exhibit 99.10**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption “Principal Accounting Fees and Services” and to the use in this Annual Report on Form 40-F filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission of our report dated March 30, 2016, with respect to the statement of financial position of Sprott Physical Platinum and Palladium Trust as at December 31, 2015, and the statements of comprehensive income (loss), changes in equity and cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2015.

 

We also consent to the incorporation by reference of our report dated March 30, 2016 in the Registration Statement (Form F-10 No. 333-211504).

 
|                |                                          |
|---------------------|-----------------------------------------------|
|                | /s/“*Ernst & Young   LLP”* |
| Toronto, Canada     | Chartered Professional Accountants            |
| March 23, 2017 | Licensed Public Accountants                   |

 

----
From: Castronovo.Alison

To: Jordan, Ronald

Cc: Thomas Finseth; Flanders, Phillip

Subject: RE: EPA questions for upcoming call with We Energies (P4 data)

Date: Monday, June 16, 2014 10:09:32 AM

Ron,

The Pleasant Prairie combined discharge to Lake Michigan via Outfall 001 consists of cooling tower

blowdown, treated FGD wastewater, and effluent from another wastewater treatment system

onsite which processes low volume wastewater, coal pile runoff, and non-chemical metal cleaning

wastewater.  When the warming line is in service, a portion of the effluent regularly routed to

Outfall 001 is directed to Outfall 002 (deicing line) immediately adjacent to the intake.  While the

FGD effluent has the potential to be included in this combined effluent, it is not discharged when

the warming line is in service because the FGD wastewater routed back to the plant impacts cooling

tower chemistry and can lead to elevated levels of Total Residual Chlorine (TRC).   Thus, during cold

periods in the winter months, when the warming line is in service, the FGD wastewater treatment

system is placed in recirculation mode (effluent is recirculated to the absorber or to the equalization

tank), which causes the mercury levels to rise due to the buildup of fine, colloidal particles that are

difficult to remove.   

Alison

From: Jordan, Ronald [mailto:Jordan.Ronald@epa.gov] 

Sent: Monday, June 16, 2014 6:34 AM

To: Castronovo.Alison

Cc: Thomas Finseth; Flanders, Phillip

Subject: RE: EPA questions for upcoming call with We Energies (P4 data)

Good morning Allison,

Thanks for sending the responses to our questions.  Regarding #23, What is the “combined effluent”

that is sent to the warming line and is FGD wastewater included in this?

Ron

From: Castronovo.Alison [mailto:Alison.Castronovo@we-energies.com]

Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2014 2:32 PM

To: Jordan, Ronald

Subject: RE: EPA questions for upcoming call with We Energies (P4 data)

Ron,

Attached is the written response from We Energies relaying the answers to EPA’s questions about

P4 data.
If you have any other questions or require further clarification, please do not hesitate to contact

Dave Lee or me.

Alison Castronovo

Environmental Engineer

We Energies

333 W. Everett Street, A231

Milwaukee, WI 53203

Office: (414) 221-4337

From: Jordan, Ronald [mailto:Jordan.Ronald@epa.gov] 

Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2014 11:36 AM

To: Lee.David; Thomas Finseth; Dan-Tam Nguyen; Yan Zhuang; Schroeder, Cuc; Flanders, Phillip

Subject: EPA questions for upcoming call with We Energies (P4 data)