alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2014451EN.01015701.xml

| 16.12.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 451/157 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.12.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 451/157

---

Opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee on the ‘Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council repealing Council Directive 93/5/EEC of 25 February 1993 on assistance to the Commission and cooperation by the Member States in the scientific examination of questions relating to food’

COM(2014) 246 final — 2014/0132 COD

(2014/C 451/26)

On 22 May 2014, the Council decided to consult the European Economic and Social Committee, under Article 114 of the TFEU, on the:

Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council repealing Council Directive 93/5/EEC of 25 February 1993 on assistance to the Commission and cooperation by the Member States in the scientific examination of questions relating to food.

Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council repealing Council Directive 93/5/EEC of 25 February 1993 on assistance to the Commission and cooperation by the Member States in the scientific examination of questions relating to food.

COM(2014) 246 final — 2014/0132 COD.

Since the Committee unreservedly endorses the contents of the proposal and has already set out its views on the subject in its opinion CES 404/2001 — 2000/0286 COD, adopted on 28 March 2001 (1), it decided, at its 500th plenary session of 9 and 10 July 2014 (meeting of 9 July), by 185 votes to 1 with 2 abstentions, not to draw up a new opinion on the subject, but to refer to the position it had taken in the above-mentioned document.

1

Brussels, 9 July 2014.

The President of the European Economic and Social Committee

Henri MALOSSE

---

(1)  ESC opinion NAT/099 on the Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down the general principles and requirements of food law, establishing the European Food Authority, and laying down procedures in matters of food safety, 2001/C 155, page 32-38 of 29 May 2001.

1

---
# C_2013228EN.01000101.xml

| 7.8.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 228/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.8.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 228/1

---

Communication from the Commission concerning the quantity not applied for to be added to the quantity fixed for the subperiod 1 October to 31 December 2013 under certain quotas opened by the European Union for poultrymeat, eggs and egg albumin products

2013/C 228/01

Commission Regulations (EC) No 533/2007 (1), (EC) No 536/2007 (2), (EC) No 539/2007 (3), (EC) No 1384/2007 (4) and (EC) No 1385/2007 (5) opened tariff quotas for imports of products in the poultrymeat sector. The applications for import licences lodged during the first seven days of June 2013 for the subperiod 1 July to 30 September 2013 are, for quotas 09.4068, 09.4070, 09.4169, 09.4015, 09.4401, 09.4402, 09.4091, 09.4092 and 09.4421, for quantities smaller than those available. Pursuant to the second sentence of Article 7(4) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1301/2006 (6), the quantities not applied for are to be added to the quantity fixed for the following quota subperiod, from 1 October to 31 December 2013; they are set out in the Annex to this communication.

1

2

3

4

5

6

---

(1)  OJ L 125, 15.5.2007, p. 9.

1

(2)  OJ L 128, 16.5.2007, p. 6.

2

(3)  OJ L 128, 16.5.2007, p. 19.

3

(4)  OJ L 309, 27.11.2007, p. 40.

4

(5)  OJ L 309, 27.11.2007, p. 47.

5

(6)  OJ L 238, 1.9.2006, p. 13.

6

---

ANNEX

| Quota order number | Quantities not applied for, to be added to the quantity fixed for the subperiod 1 October to 31 December 2013
  (in kg) |
| --- | --- |
| 09.4068 | 1 768 000 |
| 09.4070 | 445 250 |
| 09.4169 | 5 311 250 |
| 09.4015 | 27 000 000 |
| 09.4401 | 120 760 |
| 09.4402 | 3 011 588 |
| 09.4091 | 420 000 |
| 09.4092 | 482 500 |
| 09.4421 | 525 000 |

Quota order number

Quantities not applied for, to be added to the quantity fixed for the subperiod 1 October to 31 December 2013

(in kg)

09.4068

1 768 000

09.4070

445 250

09.4169

5 311 250

09.4015

27 000 000

09.4401

120 760

09.4402

3 011 588

09.4091

420 000

09.4092

482 500

09.4421

525 000

---
#### § 1200.5 What are the advantages and disadvantages of managing trust funds under the options in § 1200.4?

Under these other options, the funds remain in Federal trust status and the tribe can exercise a range of control over their management. However, the tribe has fewer investment options than it has when it withdraws its funds completely from trust status. If a tribe chooses to keep its funds in trust status, the tribe is subject to the same statutory investment restrictions that bind us. That means that the tribe's investments are limited to bank deposits and securities guaranteed by the United States. (See 25 U.S.C. 162a for specific statutory investment restrictions.)
# Suspension of Limitations Under the Jerusalem Embassy Act

# Memorandum for the Secretary of State 

Pursuant to the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States, including section 7(a) of the Jerusalem Embassy Act of 1995 (Public Law 104-45) (the “Act”), I hereby determine that it is necessary, in order to protect the national security interests of the United States, to suspend for a period of 6 months the limitations set forth in sections 3(b) and 7(b) of the Act.

                    You are hereby authorized and directed to transmit this determination to the Congress, accompanied by a report in accordance with section 7(a) of the Act, and to publish the determination in the                     *Federal Register*.                

This suspension shall take effect after transmission of this determination and report to the Congress.

[FR Doc. 2011-380

Billing code 4710-10-P
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Michael Brennan, Respondent, *v.*Louis F. Haffen, President of the Borough of The Bronx, Appellant.

First Department,

February 7, 1908.

Court — permit to remove building — peremptory order not authorized.

The court is without power to make a peremptory order requiring a borough president in the city of New York to. permit the moving of a building along and across public highways, when the application is not made in an action or recognized form of special proceeding, but merely upon affidavits.'

Appeal by the defendant, Louis F. Haffen, president, etc., from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the New York Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk-of the county of New York on, the 24th day of October, 1907.

*231
      *Theodore*Oonnoly, for the appellant.

*Lawrence E.*French, for the respondent.

Scott, J.:

The defendant appeals from a peremptory oruer, made upon, an order to show cause and affidavits requiring the defendant to issue a permit to Michael Brennan, designated as the relator, authorizing him to move a building along and across certain highways in the borough of the Bronx in the city of Hew York.

There is no authority for granting such an order in this form. It is not made in any action or recognized form of special proceeding, and is neither a mandatory injunction nor a mandamus nor an order for a mandamus. The papers are entitled “ The People of the State of Hew York on.the relation of Michael Brennan vs. Louis F. Haffen, President of the Borough of the Bronx,” which seems to indicate that the so-called relator intended to apply for a mandamus. He asked, however, only for a peremptory order, and that is what was granted. If the proceeding had been treated as an application for a mandamus, the affidavit of the defendant should have been accepted as a return, and it would have been irregular and improper to receive, as was done, an affidavit from the so called relator replying to the defendant’s affidavit. The proceeding was wholly irregular and the order unauthorized. Furthermore it was erroneous. The question involved and sought to be raised was expressly decided by this court adversely to the relator’s contention in *People ex rel. Ewing*v. *Haffen*(119 App. Div. 889) affirming an order of a Special Term held by Mr. Justice O’Goehan, refusing a similar application, although in that case the relator adopted' a proper form of procedure.

The order should be reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs.

Patterson, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin and Clarke, JJ., concurred.

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs.
§ 11.104 When does this part apply? ( a ) The regulations in this part continue to apply to each area in Indian Country listed in accordance with § 11.100 until either: ( 1 ) BIA and the tribe enter into a contract or compact for the tribe to provide judicial services; or
( 2 ) The tribe has put into effect a law-and-order code that establishes a court system and that meets the requirements of paragraph (b) of this section.
( b ) When a tribe adopts a legal code and establishes a judicial system, the tribe must notify the Assistant Secretary—Indian Affairs or his or her designee. The law-and-order code must be adopted by the tribe in accordance with its constitution and by-laws or other governing documents.
[73 FR 39859, July 11, 2008, as amended at 85 FR 646, Jan. 7, 2020]
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Austin Welcomes Marshall Islands President to Pentagon

By Jim GaramoneDOD News

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<!-- EDIT LINE -->
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                          JUN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                            JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                      122697
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                                22305
<ALLOWANCES>                                     0
<INVENTORY>                                      0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            145002
<PP&E>                                       71351
<DEPRECIATION>                                   0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              227235
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       181345
<BONDS>                                     343500
<COMMON>                                     11100
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<OTHER-SE>                                   (8160)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                227235
<SALES>                                      74635
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             74635
<CGS>                                            0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               267718
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (193084)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (193084)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                               (193084)
<EPS-BASIC>                                 (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 (.02)


</TABLE>
`[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 186 Reported in House (RH)]






                                                  House Calendar No. 61
106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 186

                          [Report No. 106-160]

   Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 1259) to amend the 
 Congressional Budget Act of 1974 to protect Social Security surpluses 
         through strengthened budgetary enforcement mechanisms.


_______________________________________________________________________


                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 24, 1999

    Mr. Linder, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION


 
   Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 1259) to amend the 
 Congressional Budget Act of 1974 to protect Social Security surpluses 
         through strengthened budgetary enforcement mechanisms.

    Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it shall be in 
order to consider in the House the bill (H.R. 1259) to amend the 
Congressional Budget Act of 1974 to protect Social Security surpluses 
through strengthened budgetary enforcement mechanisms. The bill shall 
be considered as read for amendment. The amendment specified in section 
2 of this resolution shall be considered as adopted. The previous 
question shall be considered as ordered on the bill, as amended, to 
final passage without intervening motion except: (1) two hours of 
debate equally divided and controlled among the chairmen and ranking 
minority members of the Committees on the Budget, Rules, and Ways and 
Means; and (2) one motion to recommit with or without instructions.
    Sec. 2. The amendment considered as adopted is as follows: page 3, 
line 13, strike ``cause or increase'' and insert ``set forth''.
                                     





                                                  House Calendar No. 61

106th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                              H. RES. 186

                          [Report No. 106-160]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

   Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 1259) to amend the 
 Congressional Budget Act of 1974 to protect Social Security surpluses 
         through strengthened budgetary enforcement mechanisms.

_______________________________________________________________________

                              May 24, 1999

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed`
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT 

_________________________________ 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff - Appellee, 

v. 

SEUD BLADEMIR TURCIOSARRAZOLA, a/k/a Jose Francisco 

Turcios-Arrazola, a/k/a Jose Francisco 

Torcio, 

 Defendant - Appellant. 

No. 21-1004 

(D.C. No. 1:18-CR-00097-JLK-1) 

(D. Colo.) 

_________________________________ 

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

_________________________________ 

Before TYMKOVICH, Chief Judge, KELLY and McHUGH, Circuit Judges. 

_________________________________ 

Seud Blademir Turcios-Arrazola pled guilty to illegal reentry of a previously 

deported alien following an aggravated felony conviction. He was sentenced to 

33 months in prison, which was within his advisory sentencing guidelines range. 

After Mr. Turcios-Arrazola filed this appeal, the government moved to enforce the 

appeal waiver in his plea agreement. In response, Mr. Turcios-Arrazola conceded the 

* This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines 

of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. It may be cited, however, for 

its persuasive value consistent with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 and 10th Cir. R. 32.1. 

FILED 

United States Court of Appeals 

Tenth Circuit 

April 22, 2021

Christopher M. Wolpert 

Clerk of Court
2 

enforceability of his appeal waiver. Accordingly, we grant the government’s motion 

to enforce and dismiss this appeal. 

Entered for the Court 

Per Curiam
### §1149. Excess leave and permissive temporary duty

Under regulations prescribed by the Secretary of Defense or the Secretary of Homeland Security with respect to the Coast Guard when it is not operating as a service in the Navy, the Secretary concerned shall grant a member of the armed forces who is to be involuntarily separated such excess leave (for a period not in excess of 30 days), or such permissive temporary duty (for a period not in excess of 10 days), as the member requires in order to facilitate the member's carrying out necessary relocation activities (such as job search and residence search activities), unless to do so would interfere with military missions.

(Added Pub. L. 101–510, div. A, title V, §502(a)(1), Nov. 5, 1990, 104 Stat. 1557; amended Pub. L. 103–337, div. A, title V, §542(a)(8), Oct. 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 2768; Pub. L. 107–296, title XVII, §1704(b)(1), Nov. 25, 2002, 116 Stat. 2314; Pub. L. 112–239, div. A, title X, §1076(f)(17), Jan. 2, 2013, 126 Stat. 1952.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2013—Pub. L. 112–239 inserted "when it is not operating as a service in the Navy" after "Coast Guard".

2002—Pub. L. 107–296 substituted "of Homeland Security" for "of Transportation".

1994—Pub. L. 103–337 inserted "or the Secretary of Transportation with respect to the Coast Guard" after "Secretary of Defense" and struck out "of the military department" before "concerned".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2002 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 107–296 effective on the date of transfer of the Coast Guard to the Department of Homeland Security, see section 1704(g) of Pub. L. 107–296, set out as a note under section 101 of this title.

#### Effective Date of 1994 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 103–337 applicable only to members of the Coast Guard who are separated after Sept. 30, 1994, see section 542(e) of Pub. L. 103–337, set out as a note under section 1141 of this title.
### §3748. Penalties for submission of cost known as not allowable

The submission to an agency of a proposal for settlement of costs for any period after such costs have been accrued that includes a cost that is expressly specified by statute or regulation as being unallowable, with the knowledge that such cost is unallowable, shall be subject to the provisions of section 287 of title 18 and section 3729 of title 31.

(Added and amended Pub. L. 116–283, div. A, title XVIII, §1832(a), (g), Jan. 1, 2021, 134 Stat. 4218, 4222.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

The text of subsec. (i) of section 2324 of this title, which was transferred to this section and amended by Pub. L. 116–283, §1832(g), was based on Pub. L. 99–145, title IX, §911(a)(1), Nov. 8, 1985, 99 Stat. 684; Pub. L. 103–355, title II, §2101(a)(9), Oct. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 3308.

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 3748 was renumbered section 7278 of this title.

#### Amendments

2021—Pub. L. 116–283, §1832(g), transferred subsec. (i) of section 2324 of this title to this section and struck out subsec. (i) designation and heading "Penalties for Submission of Cost Known as Not Allowable" at beginning.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section and amendment by Pub. L. 116–283 effective Jan. 1, 2022, with additional provisions for delayed implementation and applicability of existing law, see section 1801(d) of Pub. L. 116–283, set out as an Effective Date of 2021 Amendment note preceding section 3001 of this title.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Team Yokota Aids Space Systems Command in Historic US-JP Space Partnership 

By Tech. Sgt. Taylor Workman 374th Airlift Wing Public Affairs

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 33 (Thursday, February 17, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 9355-9356]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-3632]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Center for Scientific Review; Amended Notice of Meeting

    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the Center for 
Scientific Review Special Emphasis Panel, March 7, 2011, 8 a.m. to 
March 8, 2011, 8 p.m., National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge 
Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892 which was published in the Federal Register 
on February 4, 2011, 76 FR 6486-6487.
    The meeting will be held March 1, 2011 to March 2, 2011. The 
meeting time and location remain the same. The meeting is closed to the 
public.


[[Page 9356]]


    Dated: February 11, 2011.
Jennifer S. Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2011-3632 Filed 2-16-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P