alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §2647. Next-of-kin of persons unaccounted for from conflicts after World War II: transportation to annual meetings

The Secretary of Defense may provide transportation for the next-of-kin of persons who are unaccounted for from the Korean conflict, the Cold War, Vietnam War era, or the Persian Gulf War to and from an annual meeting in the United States. Such transportation shall be provided under such regulations as the Secretary of Defense may prescribe.

(Added Pub. L. 107–107, div. A, title V, §574(a), Dec. 28, 2001, 115 Stat. 1122.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Availability of Funds for Next-of-Kin of Vietnam Era Individuals

Pub. L. 107–117, div. A, title VIII, §8018, Jan. 10, 2002, 115 Stat. 2251, provided that: "Funds available in this Act [see Tables for classification] and hereafter may be used to provide transportation for the next-of-kin of individuals who have been prisoners of war or missing in action from the Vietnam era to an annual meeting in the United States, under such regulations as the Secretary of Defense may prescribe."

Similar provisions were contained in the following prior appropriation acts:

Pub. L. 106–259, title VIII, §8018, Aug. 9, 2000, 114 Stat. 678.

Pub. L. 106–79, title VIII, §8018, Oct. 25, 1999, 113 Stat. 1235.

Pub. L. 105–262, title VIII, §8018, Oct. 17, 1998, 112 Stat. 2301.

Pub. L. 105–56, title VIII, §8018, Oct. 8, 1997, 111 Stat. 1224.

Pub. L. 104–208, div. A, title I, §101(b) [title VIII, §8019], Sept. 30, 1996, 110 Stat. 3009–71, 3009–92.

Pub. L. 104–61, title VIII, §8025, Dec. 1, 1995, 109 Stat. 657.

Pub. L. 103–335, title VIII, §8031, Sept. 30, 1994, 108 Stat. 2625.

Pub. L. 103–139, title VIII, §8034, Nov. 11, 1993, 107 Stat. 1447.

Pub. L. 102–396, title IX, §9046, Oct. 6, 1992, 106 Stat. 1912.

Pub. L. 102–172, title VIII, §8047, Nov. 26, 1991, 105 Stat. 1182.

Pub. L. 101–511, title VIII, §8051, Nov. 5, 1990, 104 Stat. 1886.

Pub. L. 101–165, title IX, §9065, Nov. 21, 1989, 103 Stat. 1143.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v James Moore, Appellant.

[823 NYS2d 750]

Appeal from a judg*1304ment of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Ronald H. Tills, A.J.), rendered November 8, 2004. The judgment revoked defendant’s probation and imposed a term of imprisonment.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed. Present— Hurlbutt, A.EJ., Kehoe, Smith and Green, JJ.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# PACAF RQ-4 Global Hawks Arrive at Yokota Air Base

By Yasuo Osakabe374th Airlift Wing Public Affairs

YOKOTA AIR BASE, Japan -- U.S. Pacific Air Forces began positioning RQ-4 Global Hawks at Yokota Air Base, Japan, from Andersen Air Force Base, Guam, on May 15 to provide theater-wide enduring operations in support of maintaining a free and open Indo-Pacific.The Global Hawk’s mission is to provide a broad range of U.S. intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance capabilities to support joint forces, and Allies and partners in worldwide peacetime, contingency, and crisis operations.The Global Hawk serves as a high-altitude, long-endurance, remotely piloted and unarmed, aerial reconnaissance system. The aircraft provides persistent, day and night, high-resolution, all-weather imagery of large geographic areas with an array of integrated sensors and cameras.The Global Hawk also supports humanitarian assistance and disaster relief operations such as during Operation Tomodachi, when the Department of Defense mobilized 24,000 service members to assist Japan with disaster relief after a 9.0-magnitude earthquake hit the northeastern Honshu coast March 11, 2011, resulting in a tsunami that flooded the Fukushima Dai-ichi Nuclear Power Plant.The Global Hawk has been rotationally operating from Yokota AB since 2017.

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More
ex_302894.htm


Exhibit 10.1


 


 


Amendment to 2021 Performance Share Unit Award Agreement


 


Reference is made to the Performance Share Unit Award Agreement (the “Agreement”) dated [ELT: February 8][CEO: March 15], 2021, between MRC Global Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”) and _____ (the “Participant”).


 


Section 4.1 of the Agreement is hereby amended to add the following language at the end of Section 4.1:


 


“The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors (the “Board”) of the Company, or the Board, shall adjust Net Income to remove the positive or negative impacts of the Company’s last-in, first-out (LIFO) inventory costing methodology on Net Income.”


 


The Company and the Participant agree to this amendment to the Agreement to be effective as of November 8, 2021.


 


 


	MRC Global Inc.	 	Participant	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	By:	 	 	By:	 	 
	Name:	 	Name:	 
	Title:
Transamerica Insurance & Investment Group
Transamerica Occidental Life Insurance Company
1150 South Olive Street
Los Angeles, CA 90015

Telephone:  213-742-3129
Fax:  213-741-6623





March 9, 2007



Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20549

Re:  Transamerica  Occidental Life Insurance Company and Transamerica Occidental
     Life Separate Account VL (File No. 33-2022)

Dear Commissioner:

On behalf of Transamerica Occidental Life Insurance Company and Transamerica
Occidental Life Separate Account VL ("separate account"), incorporated by
reference is the annual report for the underlying fund, the EQ Advisers Trust,
for filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission, pursuant to Rule 30b2-1
under the Investment Company Act of 1940 ("Act").

         Filer/Entity:              EQ Advisers Trust
         File #:                    811-07953
         CIK #:                     0001027263
         Accession #:               0001193125-07-049582
         Date of Filing:            3-8-07

This annual report is for the period ending December 31, 2006, and has been
transmitted to contract holders in accordance with Rule 30d-2 under the Act.


Very truly yours,



David M. Goldstein
Senior Vice President
### §14517. Entitlement of officers discharged under this chapter to separation pay

An officer who is discharged under section 14513, 14514, or 14515 of this title is entitled to separation pay under section 1174 of this title if otherwise eligible under that section.

(Added Pub. L. 103–337, div. A, title XVI, §1611, Oct. 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 2954.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Oct. 1, 1996, see section 1691(b)(1) of Pub. L. 103–337, set out as a note under section 10001 of this title.
# C_2017378EN.01065201.xml

| 9.11.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 378/652 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.11.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 378/652

---

P7_TA(2014)0238

Hong Kong International Convention for the safe and environmentally sound recycling of ships ***

European Parliament legislative resolution of 13 March 2014 on the draft Council decision concerning the ratification of, or the accession to, the Hong Kong International Convention for the Safe and Environmentally Sound Recycling of Ships, 2009, by the Member States in the interests of the European Union (15902/2013 — C7-0485/2013 — 2012/0056(NLE))

(Consent)

(2017/C 378/70)

The European Parliament,

The European Parliament

| — | having regard to the draft Council decision (15902/2013), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the draft Council decision (15902/2013),

| — | having regard to the Hong Kong International Convention for the Safe and Environmentally Sound Recycling of Ships, 2009, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the Hong Kong International Convention for the Safe and Environmentally Sound Recycling of Ships, 2009,

| — | having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1257/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 November 2013 on ship recycling and amending Regulation (EC) No 1013/2006 and Directive 2009/16/EC (1), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1257/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 November 2013 on ship recycling and amending Regulation (EC) No 1013/2006 and Directive 2009/16/EC (1),

1

| — | having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Article 192(1) and Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (a)(v), and paragraph 8, of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C7-0485/2013), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Article 192(1) and Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (a)(v), and paragraph 8, of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C7-0485/2013),

| — | having regard to Rule 81(1), first and third subparagraphs, Rule 81(2), and Rule 90(7) of its Rules of Procedure, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Rule 81(1), first and third subparagraphs, Rule 81(2), and Rule 90(7) of its Rules of Procedure,

| — | having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety (A7-0166/2014), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety (A7-0166/2014),

| 1. | Gives its consent to the draft Council Decision; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Gives its consent to the draft Council Decision;

| 2. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States.

---

(1)  OJ L 330, 10.12.2013, p. 1.

1

---
#### § 115.901 When will the trust funds in a special deposit account be credited or paid out to the owner of the funds?

OTFM will disburse the trust funds from a special deposit account and deposit the trust funds in the owner's trust account following the BIA certification of the ownership of the funds and OTFM's receipt of such certification.
Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection =-- = j,- -==- -- -=="""'" -

Secretary 

Mr. Shawn M. Garvin 

Regional Administrator 

Rachel Carson State Office Building 

P.O. Box 2063 

Harrisburg, P A 17105-2063 

December 10, 2009 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region III 

1650 Arch Street (Mail Code: 3RAOO) 

Philadelphia, PA 19103-2029 

Dear Mr. Garvin: 

717-787-2814 

A State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision was submitted to the U.S. Environmental 

Protection Agency (EPA) on August 29,2007, for the five-county Penosylvania portion of the 

Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City Eight-hour Ozone Nonattainment Area (Philadelphia 

Nonattainment Area). Errors were identified in the August 2007 submission for stationary point 

sources, due to facilities being counted multiple times as a result of facility name changes. An 

error was also found in the calculation of2008 projected emissions from area sources. 

Therefore, I have enclosed for your full approval under Section 110 of the Clean Air Act a SIP 

revision pertaining to the correction of the 2002 Base-Year Inventory for the Philadelphia 

Nonattainment Area. The revised appendices are also enclosed. 

The Commonwealth's public participation process for this SIP revision has been completed. 

During the public comment period, a public hearing was scheduled to be held, if requested, 

Thursday, October 29, 2009, in Norristown. No request for a public hearing was received, so the 

public hearing was canceled. The written comment period closed on October 30,2009. No 

written comments were received, so a Comment/Response document was not developed. The 

following documents are enclosed for your review and approval: 

1. SIP revision reflecting changes made to the 2002 Base Year Inventory included in the' 

SIP revision submitted to EPA August 29, 2007. 

2. Revised appendices for stationary point and area sources. 

3. Certification of public participation activities. 

Should you have any questions concerning the requested SIP revision, please contact 

Joyce E. Epps, Director, Bureau of Air Quality, bye-mail atjeepps@state.pa.us or by telephone 

at 717-787-9702 .. 

~;~~ Secretary 

Enclosures 

An Equal Opportunity Employer www.clep.state.pa.us Printed on Recycled Paper @
### §2199. Definitions

In this chapter:

(1) The term "defense laboratory" means a laboratory operated by the Department of Defense or owned by the Department of Defense and operated by a contractor or a facility of a Defense Agency at which research and development activities are conducted.

(2) The term "institution of higher education" has the meaning given such term in section 101 of the Higher Education Act of 1965.

(3) The term "regional center for the transfer of manufacturing technology" means a manufacturing extension center for the transfer of manufacturing technology and best business practices referred to in section 25(b) of the National Institute of Standards and Technology Act (15 U.S.C. 278k).

(Added Pub. L. 102–190, div. A, title VIII, §825(a)(1), Dec. 5, 1991, 105 Stat. 1441; amended Pub. L. 105–244, title I, §102(a)(2)(B), Oct. 7, 1998, 112 Stat. 1617; Pub. L. 114–329, title V, §501(e)(1), Jan. 6, 2017, 130 Stat. 3032.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Section 101 of the Higher Education Act of 1965, referred to in par. (2), is classified to section 1001 of Title 20, Education.

#### Amendments

2017—Par. (3). Pub. L. 114–329, §501(e)(1)(B), (C), inserted "and best business practices" before "referred" and substituted "section 25(b)" for "section 25(a)".

Pub. L. 114–329, §501(e)(1)(A), which directed substitution of "manufacturing extension center" for "regional center", was executed by making the substitution after "means a" outside of the defined term, to reflect the probable intent of Congress.

1998—Par. (2). Pub. L. 105–244 substituted "section 101 of the Higher Education Act of 1965" for "section 1201(a) of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1141(a))".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1998 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 105–244 effective Oct. 1, 1998, except as otherwise provided in Pub. L. 105–244, see section 3 of Pub. L. 105–244, set out as a note under section 1001 of Title 20, Education.
Exhibit 99.1


                 CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO
                         18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                          AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 Section 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Australian-
Canadian Oil Royalties Ltd. (the "Company") for the quarterly period ended
September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the "Report"), Ely Sakhai, Chairman of the Board and
President of the Company, and Robert Kamon, Chief Financial Officer and
Secretary of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, to the best of their knowledge, that:

    1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
    or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

    2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
    material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
    the Company.



/s/ Ely Sakhai
-------------------------------------------------
Ely Sakhai
Chairman of the Board and President

November 12, 2003




/s/ Robert Kamon
------------------------------------------------
Robert Kamon
Chief Financial Officer and Secretary

November 12, 2003


This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes
of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
No. 10.014.

#### The Grand Lodge of the State of Louisiana vs. Charles Cavanac, State Tax Collector, et als.

*A*clerk’s certificate that a transcript is complete, as containing all the evidence adduced, etc., protects an appellant, although the transcript does not contain that evidence.

In such a case, in furtherance of the ends of justice, the cause must be remanded.

*1110APPEAL from the Civil District Court. Parish of Orleans. *Houston,*J.

*Honor & Lee*and *J. Q. A. Fellows,*for Plaintiff and Appellee.

*M. J. Cmvningham,,*Attorney General, and *J. C. Moise,*for Defendants and Appellants.

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Bermudez, C. J.

The State appeals from a judgment exempting certain property of the plaintiff’s from taxation for the year 1877.

Although the certificate of the clerk is full, and such as the law requires, the fact is that the transcript does not contain a particle of the evidence which was actually offered below.

The omission is apparently attributable to the clerk, in the absence of production by him of authority to justify it; but the appellant, not being shown to be in default, is protected by the clerical attestation.

It is possible that proof was administered to establish that the property in question was used in a manner to entitle it to the execution which the plaintiff claims, under Sec. 3 of Secs. 2233 of the R. S.

We consider that, in furtherance of the ends of the justice, it is better to remand the case to the lower court for the purpose of obtaining the desired evidence. 16 L. 572.

While the judgment appealed from must give way to carry out this object, we do not propose to say that it was improperly rendered ; for aught we know, it may be justified by the evidence adduced, as the plaintiff claims that full proof was administered showing the extent and nature of the use of the property and fully meeting, to the satisfaction of the court, the special defense in the answer’.

It is, therefore, ordered and decreed, that the judgment appealed from be set aside, and that the cause be remanded for further proceeding according to the views herein expressed and according to law.
#### § 161.717 What happens if BIA does not collect enough money to satisfy the penalty?

BIA will send written notice to the trespasser demanding immediate settlement and advising the trespasser that unless settlement is received within 5 business days from the date of receipt, BIA will forward the case for appropriate legal action. BIA may send a copy of the notice to the Navajo Nation, permittee, and any known lien holders.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 185 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                          May 25, 1999.
    Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker 
may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule XVIII, declare the House resolved into the 
Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of the 
bill (H.R. 1906) making appropriations for Agriculture, Rural Development, Food 
and Drug Administration, and Related Agencies for the fiscal year ending 
September 30, 2000, and for other purposes. The first reading of the bill shall 
be dispensed with. Points of order against consideration of the bill for failure 
to comply with clause 4(a) of rule XIII or section 306 of the Congressional 
Budget Act of 1974 are waived. General debate shall be confined to the bill and 
shall not exceed one hour equally divided and controlled by the chairman and 
ranking minority member of the Committee on Appropriations. After general debate 
the bill shall be considered for amendment under the five-minute rule. Points of 
order against provisions in the bill for failure to comply with clause 2 of rule 
XXI are waived. During consideration of the bill for amendment, the Chairman of 
the Committee of the Whole may accord priority in recognition on the basis of 
whether the Member offering an amendment has caused it to be printed in the 
portion of the Congressional Record designated for that purpose in clause 8 of 
rule XVIII. Amendments so printed shall be considered as read. The Chairman of 
the Committee of the Whole may: (1) postpone until a time during further 
consideration in the Committee of the Whole a request for a recorded vote on any 
amendment; and (2) reduce to five minutes the minimum time for electronic voting 
on any postponed question that follows another electronic vote without 
intervening business, provided that the minimum time for electronic voting on 
the first in any series of questions shall be 15 minutes. At the conclusion of 
consideration of the bill for amendment the Committee shall rise and report the 
bill to the House with such amendments as may have been adopted. The previous 
question shall be considered as ordered on the bill and amendments thereto to 
final passage without intervening motion except one motion to recommit with or 
without instructions.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```