alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
H. Res. 269

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

November 8, 1999.

Whereas Joseph Jefferson ‘‘Shoeless Joe’’ Jackson, a native

of Greenville, South Carolina, and a local legend, began

his professional career and received his nickname while

playing baseball for the Greenville Spinners in 1908;

Whereas ‘‘Shoeless Joe’’ Jackson moved to the Philadelphia

Athletics for his major league debut in 1908, to Cleveland in 1910, and to the Chicago White Sox in 1915;

Whereas ‘‘Shoeless Joe’’ Jackson’s accomplishments throughout his 13-year career in professional baseball were outstanding—he was one of only seven Major League Baseball players to ever top the coveted mark of a .400 batting average for a season, and he earned a lifetime batting average of .356, the third highest of all time;

Whereas ‘‘Shoeless Joe’’ Jackson’s career record makes him

one of our Nation’s top baseball players of all time;

Whereas in 1919, the infamous ‘‘Black Sox’’ scandal erupted

when an employee of a New York gambler allegedly

bribed eight players of the Chicago White Sox, including

Joseph Jefferson ‘‘Shoeless Joe’’ Jackson, to throw the

first and second games of the 1919 World Series to the

Cincinnati Reds;
2

•HRES 269 EH

Whereas in September 1920, a criminal court acquitted

‘‘Shoeless Joe’’ Jackson of the charge that he conspired

to throw the 1919 World Series;

Whereas despite the acquittal, Judge Kenesaw Mountain

Landis, baseball’s first commissioner, banned ‘‘Shoeless

Joe’’ Jackson from playing Major League Baseball for

life without conducting any investigation of Jackson’s alleged activities, issuing a summary punishment that fell

far short of due process standards;

Whereas the evidence shows that Jackson did not deliberately

misplay during the 1919 World Series in an attempt to

make his team lose the World Series;

Whereas during the 1919 World Series, Jackson’s play was

outstanding—his batting average was .375 (the highest

of any player from either team), he set a World Series

record with 12 hits, he committed no errors, and he hit

the only home run of the series;

Whereas because of his lifetime ban from Major League

Baseball, ‘‘Shoeless Joe’’ Jackson has been excluded from

consideration for admission to the Major League Baseball

Hall of Fame;

Whereas ‘‘Shoeless Joe’’ Jackson died in 1951, and 80 years

have elapsed since the 1919 World Series scandal erupted;

Whereas recently, Major League Baseball Commissioner Bud

Selig took an important first step toward restoring the

reputation of ‘‘Shoeless Joe’’ Jackson by agreeing to investigate whether he was involved in a conspiracy to alter

the outcome of the 1919 World Series and whether he

should be eligible for inclusion in the Major League Baseball Hall of Fame; and
3

•HRES 269 EH

Whereas it is appropriate for Major League Baseball to remove the taint upon the memory of ‘‘Shoeless Joe’’ Jackson and honor his outstanding baseball accomplishments:

Now, therefore, be it

Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Representatives that Joseph Jefferson ‘‘Shoeless Joe’’ Jackson should

be appropriately honored for his outstanding baseball accomplishments.

Attest:

Clerk.
# C_2013072EN.01000201.xml

| 12.3.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 72/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.3.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 72/2

---

Notice for the attention of the persons to whom measures provided for in Council Decision 2011/235/CFSP, as amended by Council Decision 2013/124/CFSP and in Council Regulation (EU) No 359/2011, as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 206/2013 concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Iran apply

2013/C 72/03

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

The following information is brought to the attention of the persons that appear in the Annex to Council Decision 2011/235/CFSP, as amended by Council Decision 2013/124/CSFP (1), and in Annex I to Council Regulation (EU) No 359/2011, as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 206/2013 (2) concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Iran.

1

2

The Council of the European Union has decided that the persons that appear in the abovementioned Annexes should be included in the list of persons and entities subject to restrictive measures provided for in Decision 2011/235/CFSP and in Regulation (EU) No 359/2011.

The attention of the persons concerned is drawn to the possibility of making an application to the competent authorities of the relevant Member State(s) as indicated on the websites in Annex II to Regulation (EU) No 359/2011, in order to obtain an authorisation to use frozen funds for basic needs or specific payments (cf. Article 4 of the Regulation).

The persons concerned may submit a request to the Council, together with supporting documentation, that the decision to include them on the abovementioned list should be reconsidered, to the following address:

| Council of the European Union |
| --- |
| DG C 1C — Horizontal Issues Unit |
| General Secretariat |
| Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175 |
| 1048 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

Council of the European Union

DG C 1C — Horizontal Issues Unit

General Secretariat

Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175

1048 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

The attention of the persons concerned is also drawn to the possibility of challenging the Council's decision before the General Court of the European Union, in accordance with the conditions laid down in Article 275, second paragraph, and Article 263, fourth and sixth paragraphs, of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.

---

(1)  OJ L 68, 12.3.2013, p. 57.

1

(2)  OJ L 68, 12.3.2013, p. 9.

2

---
§ 166.811 How will the sale of impounded livestock or other property be conducted? ( a ) Unless the owner or known lien holder of the impounded livestock or other property redeems the property prior to the time set by the sale, by submitting proof of ownership and settling all obligations under § 166.804 and § 166.812 of this subpart, the property will be sold by public sale to the highest bidder.
( b ) If a satisfactory bid is not received, the livestock or property may be re-offered for sale, returned to the owner, condemned and destroyed, or otherwise disposed of.
( c ) We will give the purchaser a bill of sale or other written receipt evidencing the sale.
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

In the

United States Court of Appeals

For the Eleventh Circuit

____________________

No. 22-10901

Non-Argument Calendar

____________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JIMMY LEE HIGHSMITH, 

Defendant-Appellant.

____________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Florida

D.C. Docket No. 4:21-cr-00008-MW-MAF-1

____________________

USCA11 Case: 22-10901 Document: 46-1 Date Filed: 02/06/2023 Page: 1 of 2
2 Opinion of the Court 22-10901

Before WILLIAM PRYOR, Chief Judge, and WILSON and LUCK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Donna Lee Elm, appointed counsel for Jimmy Lee Highsmith in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from 

further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to 

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review 

of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative 

merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of 

the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Highsmith’s conviction and 

sentence are AFFIRMED. 

USCA11 Case: 22-10901 Document: 46-1 Date Filed: 02/06/2023 Page: 2 of 2
#### TENNESSEE COPPER COMPANY, Appellant, v. Dora Simmons SMITH, Appellee.

No. 12084.

United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit.

Oct. 21, 1954.

*429Frantz, McConnell & Seymour, Knoxville, Tenn., for appellant.

Hodges & Doughty, Knoxville, Tenn., for appellee.

Before ALLEN, McALLISTER and MILLER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

In this action for damages for personal injuries arising out of an automobile accident in Polk County, Tennessee, judgment was entered upon the jury’s verdict for $25,000 in favor of the appellee, who was a passenger in one of the automobiles involved. Appellant’s motion for a new trial was overruled by the District Judge, conditioned upon the appellee accepting a remittitur of $6,000, with which condition appellee complied. This appeal followed.

Appellant contends that the accident was caused by the sole negligence of the operator of a third automobile who pulled out from behind the car in which appellee was riding into the path of the appellant’s truck coming in the opposite direction, which caused appellant’s driver to apply his brakes suddenly, causing the truck to skid into collision with appellee’s car.

There was substantial evidence that appellant’s truck was being operated at a speed of from 50 to 65 miles per hour at the time. The Tennessee statutory speed limit for trucks is 40 miles per hour. Sec. 2682.1, Code of Tennessee.

The District Judge overruled appellant’s motion for a directed verdict, but instructed the jury under the sudden peril doctrine, which included the well settled qualification that the appellant could not claim the benefit of the rule if its negligence contributed to the creation of the emergency, which factual issue was left to the jury. Smith v. Fisher, 11 Tenn.App. 273; Caldwell v. Hodges, 18 Tenn.App. 355, 77 S.W.2d 817; Shook v. Simmons, 23 Tenn.App. 685, 137 S.W.2d 332. In view of the evidence above referred to, we are of the opinion that the question involved in this phase of the case was properly left to the jury. Stanford v. Holloway, 25 Tenn. App. 379, 157 S.W.2d 864, 869-870.

Appellee’s injuries were serious and in part permanent, including multiple fractures, a serious brain injury, and partial paralysis of the left side. There was a 60 to 70 per cent disability in the use of her left upper extremity. She was hospitalized on three separate occasions. Hospital and medical bills were $1,555.23. We do not agree with appellant’s contention that in view of her age of 65, with a life expectancy of approximately ll]/2 years, the verdict was so excessive as to indicate that it was the result of passion, prejudice or unaccountable caprice on *430the part of the jury, or that the judgment was so excessive as to require this Court to set it aside and direct a new trial. In a personal injury suit damages are unliquidated and there is no fixed measure of mathematical certainty. The determination by the jury will not be set aside where, as in this case, there is substantial evidence to sustain the amount of the verdict. Werthan Bag Corp. v. Agnew, 6 Cir., 202 F.2d 119, 123. See Spero-Nelson v. Brown, 6 Cir., 175 F.2d 86.

The judgment is affirmed.
EXHIBIT
32.1



Written
Statement of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350



Solely
for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. §1350, I, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Acting Chief Financial
Officer of PROCESSA PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. (the “Company”), hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that the annual
report on Form 10-K/A of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2017 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



This
certification is being furnished solely to accompany this Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 and is not being filed for purposes
of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the registrant,
whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.



| | Date:
    April 17, 2018
| | ------------------------
| |                         
| | By:                     
| |                         
| |                         
| |                         
| |
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Gunsan City Fire Department Visits the Wolf Pack

By Staff Sgt. Nick Wilson8th Fighter Wing Public Affairs

**KUNSAN AIR BASE, Republic of Korea**

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More News/Articles
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

# George Washington Carrier Strike Group Enhances Alliance with Australia

By Mass Communication Specialist 2nd Class Paolo Bayas, USS George Washington Public Affairs

                BRISBANE, Australia  –              

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More News/Articles
#### Isaac Perlmutter, Appellant, v. Caroline W. Beneke, Respondent.

Motion to dismiss appeal granted, with ten dollars costs.
### §14105. Notice of convening of promotion board

(a) Required Notice.—At least 30 days before a promotion board is convened under section 14101(a) of this title to consider officers in a grade and competitive category for promotion to the next higher grade, the Secretary concerned shall either (1) notify in writing the officers eligible for consideration by the board for promotion regarding the convening of the board, or (2) issue a general written notice to the armed force concerned regarding the convening of the board.

(b) Content of Notice.—A notice under subsection (a) shall include the date on which the board is to convene and (except in the case of a vacancy promotion board) the name and date of rank of the junior officer, and of the senior officer, in the promotion zone as of the date of the notice.

(Added Pub. L. 103–337, div. A, title XVI, §1611, Oct. 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 2925.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Oct. 1, 1996, see section 1691(b)(1) of Pub. L. 103–337, set out as a note under section 10001 of this title.
EXHIBIT 13.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report on Form 20-F of GasLog Ltd., a corporation organized under the laws of Bermuda (the Company), for the period ending December 31, 2013, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned officer of
  the Company certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|  
|--
|1.
|  
|2.

The foregoing certification is provided solely for purposes of complying with the provisions of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not intended to be used or relied upon for any other purpose.

|    |  |                                      |  | 
|--- |  | ------------------------------------ |  | 
|    |  | Date: March 27, 2014                 |  | 
|By: |  | /s/ Simon Crowe                      |  | 
|    |  | Name: Simon Crowe                    |  | 
|    |  | Title: Chief Financial
      Officer |  | 



---
# C_2014214EN.01005501.xml

| 8.7.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 214/55 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.7.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 214/55

---

Opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee on the Amended proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down a procedure for the provision of information in the field of technical regulations and of rules on Information Society services

(codification)

COM(2013) 932 final — 2010/0095 (COD)

2014/C 214/11

On 13 January 2014 and 21 February 2014 respectively, the European Parliament and the Council decided to consult the European Economic and Social Committee, under Articles 43, 114 and 304 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, on the

Amended proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down a procedure for the provision of information in the field of technical regulations and of rules on Information Society services (codification)

Amended proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down a procedure for the provision of information in the field of technical regulations and of rules on Information Society services (codification)

COM(2013) 932 final — 2010/0095 (COD).

Since the Committee endorses the content of the proposal and has already set out its views on the subject in its earlier opinion CESE 966/2010, adopted on 14 July 2010 (1), it decided, at its 496th plenary session (meeting of 26 February 2014), by 224 votes to 4 with 13 abstentions, to issue an opinion endorsing the proposed text.

1

Brussels, 26 February 2014

The President of the European Economic and Social Committee

Henri MALOSSE

---

(1)  EESC opinion on the Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down a procedure for the provision of information in the field of technical standards and regulations and of rules on Information Society services (codification), OJ C 44, 11.2.2011, p. 142.

1

Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down a procedure for the provision of information in the field of technical standards and regulations and of rules on Information Society services

---
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News

Air Force Supports First Ever Army Warfighter Exercise in Indo-Pacific Focusing on Joint Large-scale Combat OperationsNovember 22, 2022 — U.S. Air Force Airmen supported U.S. Army Pacific and U.S. Army’s Mission Command Training Program Soldiers during the Army’s first warfighter exercise to take place in the Indo-Pacific theatre concentrating on joint large-scale combat operations contested in all domains... MORE 

----

2024 (327)2023 (825)2022 (1193)2021 (1066)2020 (1083)2019 (1166)2018 (1116)2017 (1356)2016 (1475)2015 (1408)2014 (904)2013 (32)2012 (4)

About DoDDoD CareersJoin the MilitaryNewsUSA.govPhotos & VideosPrivacy & SecurityTop Issues

US INDOPACOM Inspector GeneralDoD Inspector General Accessibility/Section 508DoD FOIAUS INDOPACOM FOIALink DisclaimerNo FEAR ActRecovery ActINDOPACOM Webmaster

                  - Facebook
                  - X
                  - YouTube
                  - Instagram
                  - RSS

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
### **CHAPTER 865—SALVAGE FACILITIES**

Sec.
8701.
Authority to provide for necessary salvage facilities.
8702.
Acquisition and transfer of vessels and equipment.
8703.
Settlement of claims.
8704.
Disposition of receipts.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior chapter 865, formerly consisting of sections 8881 to 8889, related to retirement from the Air Force for age, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 85–155, title IV, §401(1), Aug. 21, 1957, 71 Stat. 390, and Pub. L. 96–513, title II, §216, Dec. 12, 1980, 94 Stat. 2886.

#### Amendments

**2018**—Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, §807(e)(4), (f)(1), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1838, redesignated chapter 637 of this title as this chapter and items 7361 to 7364 as 8701 to 8704, respectively.

**1996**—Pub. L. 104–106, div. A, title X, §1015, Feb. 10, 1996, 110 Stat. 424, amended analysis generally, adding items 7361 to 7364 and striking out former items 7361 "Naval salvage facilities: contracts for commercial facilities", 7362 "Commercial use of naval facilities", 7363 "Transfer of equipment: contract provisions", 7365 "Settlement of claims", and 7367 "Disposition of receipts".

**1994**—Pub. L. 103–355, title II, §2001(j)(3)(B), Oct. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 3303, struck out item 7364 "Advancement of funds for salvage operations".

**1993**—Pub. L. 103–160, div. A, title VIII, §828(a)(8), Nov. 30, 1993, 107 Stat. 1713, struck out item 7366 "Limitation on appropriations".