alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §20232. Authority to allow officers to opt out of selection board consideration

(a) Authority.—The Secretary of the Air Force may provide that an officer on the Space Force officer list may, upon the officer's request and with the approval of the Secretary, be excluded from consideration by a selection board convened under section 20211 of this title to consider officers for promotion to the next higher grade.

(b) Criteria.—The Secretary may only approve a request under subsection (a) as follows:

(1) Completion of certain assignments.—If—

(A) the basis for the request is to allow an officer to complete a broadening assignment, an advanced education assignment, another assignment of significant value to the Department, or a career progression requirement delayed by such an assignment;

(B) the Secretary determines the exclusion from consideration is in the best interest of the Space Force; and

(C) the officer has not previously failed of selection for promotion to the grade for which the officer requests the exclusion from consideration.

(2) Completion of certain education.—If—

(A) the basis for the request is to allow an officer to complete advanced education or professional military education;

(B) the Secretary determines that it is in the best interests of the Space Force for the officer to continue to serve in current position and grade; and

(C) the officer has not previously opted out of a promotion board under this section.

(3) Service in critical skill position.—If—

(A) the officer is serving in a critical skill position that cannot be filled by another Space Force officer serving in the same grade;

(B) the Secretary determines that it is in the best interests of the Space Force for the officer to continue to serve in their current position and grade; and

(C) the officer has not previously opted out of a promotion board under this section.

(Added Pub. L. 118–31, div. A, title XVII, §1716(c), Dec. 22, 2023, 137 Stat. 641.)
### §1799. Child care services and youth program services for dependents: participation by children and youth otherwise ineligible

(a) Authority.—The Secretary of Defense may authorize participation in child care or youth programs of the Department of Defense, to the extent of the availability of space and services, by children and youth under the age of 19 who are not dependents of members of the armed forces or of employees of the Department of Defense and are not otherwise eligible for participation in those programs.

(b) Limitation.—Authorization of participation in a program under subsection (a) shall be limited to situations in which that participation promotes the attainment of the objectives set forth in subsection (c), as determined by the Secretary.

(c) Objectives.—The objectives for authorizing participation in a program under subsection (a) are as follows:

(1) To support the integration of children and youth of military families into civilian communities.

(2) To make more efficient use of Department of Defense facilities and resources.

(3) To establish or support a partnership or consortium arrangement with schools and other youth services organizations serving children of members of the armed forces.

(Added Pub. L. 106–65, div. A, title V, §584(a)(1)(B), Oct. 5, 1999, 113 Stat. 634; amended Pub. L. 107–314, div. A, title X, §1041(a)(7), Dec. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 2645.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2002—Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 107–314 struck out heading and text of subsec. (d). Text read as follows:

"(1) Every two years the Secretary of Defense shall submit to Congress a report on the exercise of authority under this section. The report shall include an evaluation of the effectiveness of that authority for achieving the objectives set out under subsection (c). The report may include any recommendations for legislation that the Secretary considers appropriate to enhance the capability of the Department of Defense to attain those objectives.

"(2) A biennial report under this subsection may be combined with the biennial report under section 1798(d) of this title into a single report for submission to Congress."
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 32 (Wednesday, February 16, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 9018]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-3529]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention


Disease, Disability, and Injury Prevention and Control Special 
Emphasis Panel (SEP): Emerging Infections Sentinel Network (EISN) 
Research, Funding Opportunity Announcement (FOA), CK11-002, Initial 
Review

    In accordance with Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), the Centers for Disease Control and 
Prevention (CDC), announces the aforementioned meeting:
    Times and Dates: 12 p.m.-2 p.m., March 29, 2011 (Closed).
    Place: Teleconference.
    Status: The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with 
provisions set forth in Section 552b(c)(4) and (6), Title 5 U.S.C., and 
the Determination of the Director, Management Analysis and Services 
Office, CDC, pursuant to Public Law 92-463.
    Matters To Be Discussed: The meeting will include the initial 
review, discussion, and evaluation of applications received in response 
to ``Emerging Infections Sentinel Network (EISN) Research, FOA CK11-
002, initial review.''
    Contact Person for More Information: Gregory Anderson, MS, MPH, 
Scientific Review Officer, CDC, 1600 Clifton Road, NE., Mailstop E60, 
Atlanta, Georgia 30333, Telephone: (404) 498-2293.
    The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, has been 
delegated the authority to sign Federal Register notices pertaining to 
announcements of meetings and other committee management activities, 
for both the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Agency 
for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.

    Dated: February 4, 2011.
Elaine L. Baker,
Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for Disease 
Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2011-3529 Filed 2-15-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Camp Zama Hosts Health, Safety Fair with Local Fire Bureau and the Sagamihara Disaster Prevention

By Lance DavisU.S. Army Garrison Japan Public Affairs Office

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More News/Articles
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                             385
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   12,004
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (518)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                12,422
<PP&E>                                         176,968
<DEPRECIATION>                                (36,878)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 157,722
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          176,585
<BONDS>                                        132,988
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                     118,874
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   157,722
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                25,310
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   18,136
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  (90)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 (518)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              12,592
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (5,841)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,876
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (7,717)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (7,717)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00


</TABLE>
### §20505. Officer considered for removal: voluntary retirement or discharge

(a) In General.—At any time during proceedings under this chapter with respect to the removal of an officer from a space force active status, the Secretary of the Air Force may grant a request by the officer—

(1) for voluntary retirement, if the officer is qualified for retirement; or

(2) for discharge in accordance with subsection (b)(2).

(b) Retirement or Discharge.—An officer removed from a space force active status under section 20503 of this title shall—

(1) if eligible for voluntary retirement under any provision of law on the date of such removal, be retired in the grade and with the retired pay for which the officer would be eligible if retired under such provision; and

(2) if ineligible for voluntary retirement under any provision of law on the date of such removal—

(A) be honorably discharged in the grade then held, in the case of an officer whose case was brought under subsection (a) of section 20501 of this title; or

(B) be discharged in the grade then held, in the case of an officer whose case was brought under subsection (b) of section 20501 of this title.

(c) Separation Pay for Discharged Officer.—An officer who is discharged under subsection (b)(2) is entitled, if eligible therefor, to separation pay under section 1174(a)(2) of this title.

(Added Pub. L. 118–31, div. A, title XVII, §1719, Dec. 22, 2023, 137 Stat. 661.)
#### Frederick Randall, Appellant, v. Thomas P. Kinsley, Respondent.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. 'No opinion..
#### Herman Seiffert, Appellant, v. William Bunger, Respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. No opinion.
#### Mack Cooper v. The State.

No. 22730.

Delivered December 15, 1943.

The opinion states the case.

*Bert G. Ashby,*of Dallas, for appellant.

*Spurgeon E. Bell,*State’s Attorney, of Austin, for the State.

KRUEGER, Judge.

*450The offense is the possession of whisky- in a container to which no tax stamp had been affixed. The punishment-was assessed at confinement in the county jail for a period of 60 days and a fine of $250.00.

Appellant seriously contends that the court erred in two respects: First, in declining to grant his motion protesting the entry of the judgment of conviction on the minutes of the court for the reason that appellant was not given a public trial as provided by Section 10 of Article 1 of the Constitution, and Article 518, C. C. P.; and second, because the court declined to hear and consider his motion for new trial.

We will undertake to dispose of the questions in the order in which they are presented. The record shows that when appellant was arrested for the offense charged, he was placed in jail. The next day he was escorted to the office of the county judge, where he waived a jury and entered a plea of guilty. After tlie court had received the plea of guilty and assessed the punishment as above stated, appellant obtained the services of an attorney who, four days after the court had pronounced judgment but before the same was entered upon the minutes, filed a motion protesting the entry of the judgment upon the minutes because appellant was not given a public trial but was given a trial in the judge’s private office. The court, upon the hearing thereof, dismissed the same together with appellant’s motion for new trial. It is our opinion that there was no error in the trial court’s action for the reasons stated in our opinion this day delivered in the case of Tischmacher v. State, (Page 464 of this volume). The motion for new trial was not filed within two days as provided by Art. 755, C. C. P., and no valid reason is given for the delay. Therefore, in the absence of a showing that the trial court abused his discretion in declining to consider the motion, this court is not authorized to interfere with the judgment of conviction. See Synagogue v. State, 122 Tex. Cr. R. 472, and cases there cited.

No reversible error appearing in the record, the judgment of the trial court it affirmed.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
Exhibit
32.1



CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO

18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In
connection with the Annual Report of Earth Science Tech, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the period
ending March 31, 2020 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Nickolas
S. Tabraue as CEO and Robert Stevens as Receiver for Earth Science Tech, Inc. in Case No. A-18-784952-C, certify pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and
belief:



(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
of the Company.



|                           | RECEIVER
                                         FOR EARTH SCIENCE TECH, INC.
        CASE
        NO. A-18-784952-C
        STRONGBOW
        ADVISORS, INC.
|-------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                           |                                                                                                                                                               
|Dated:
    August 18, 2020 | By:                                                                                                                                                           
|                           |                                                                                                                                                               
|                           | Its:                                                                                                                                                          



|                           | EARTH
    SCIENCE TECH, INC.
|-------------------------- | ----------------------------
|                           |                             
|Dated:
    August 18, 2020 | By:                         
|                           |                             
|                           | Its:                        



A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise
adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Edgar Rock, Appellant, v. International Paper Company, Respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. No opinion. All concurred, except Chester and Kellogg, JJ., dissenting.
### §2200f. Inapplicability to Coast Guard

This chapter does not apply to the Coast Guard when it is not operating as a service in the Navy.

(Added Pub. L. 106–398, §1 [[div. A], title IX, §922(a)(1)], Oct. 30, 2000, 114 Stat. 1654, 1654A–236.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Transfer of Functions

For transfer of authorities, functions, personnel, and assets of the Coast Guard, including the authorities and functions of the Secretary of Transportation relating thereto, to the Department of Homeland Security, and for treatment of related references, see sections 468(b), 551(d), 552(d), and 557 of Title 6, Domestic Security, and the Department of Homeland Security Reorganization Plan of November 25, 2002, as modified, set out as a note under section 542 of Title 6.
#### § 166.2 Can the BIA waive the application of these regulations?

Yes. In any case in which these regulations conflict with the objectives of the agricultural resource management plan provided for in § 166.311 of this part, or with a tribal law, the BIA may waive the application of such regulations unless the waiver would constitute a violation of a federal statute or judicial decision or would conflict with the BIA's general trust responsibility under federal law.
#### Raymond J. DOHERTY, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. NEW YORK CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 73, Docket 23168.

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

Argued Oct. 8, 1954.

Decided Oct. 8, 1954.

Brown, Kelly, Turner & Symons, Buffalo, N. Y. (John E. Leach, Buffalo, N. Y., of counsel), for defendant-appellant.

McElroy, Young, Mahley & Dunn, Syracuse, N. Y. (William C. Martin, Syracuse, N. Y., of counsel), for plaintiff-appellee.

Before CLARK, Chief Judge, and L. HAND and FRANK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Judgment affirmed in open court.'
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary information extracted from Multex.com,
Inc.'s Consolidated Balance Sheet (Unaudited) for March 31, 1999 and
Consolidated Statement of Income (Unaudited) for the Three Months ended
March 31, 1999 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                           1,103
<SECURITIES>                                    61,040
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,561
<ALLOWANCES>                                       138
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                67,354
<PP&E>                                           7,856
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,007
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  70,365
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            8,781
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           218
<OTHER-SE>                                      62,655
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    70,365
<SALES>                                          5,025
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 5,025
<CGS>                                            1,326
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,326
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   123
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  18
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,641)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (3,641)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,641)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.89)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.89)
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with the Annual Report of Ameri Metro, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended July 31, 2018 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:  1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.  3. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.  Date: October 11, 2019By:/s/ Debra MathiasDebra MathiasChief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)