Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 138 / Tuesday, July 20, 2010 / Proposed Rules 42017 

fill out, endorse and file the required 

paperwork. As such, the cost for a oneyear period would be $94 (1 hour × $94 

per hour). 

In addition to the paperwork that 

would be required as a result of this 

proposal, it is expected that some flight 

operations would not be authorized. 

Without authorization from the FAA to 

conduct these flights, the operator’s 

inability to conduct such operations 

would result in a significant economic 

impact. 

The FAA has used Department of 

Transportation Form 41 data for the 

total operating revenue per flight for 

international cargo operations of U.S. 

Operators. In 2009, the reported median 

revenue estimate was approximately 

$70,000 per flight, although the profit 

would be substantially less. As the 

number of flights currently operating 

would continue for the foreseeable 

future, operators who eliminate flights 

as a result of the proposed rule would 

incur a significant economic loss. The 

proposal would affect ‘‘more than just a 

few’’ operators who fly in Afghanistan. 

As such, we believe flights would be 

eliminated for a substantial number of 

operators. 

The requirements of this proposal 

would have a significant economic 

impact on a substantial number of small 

entities. 

5. Relevant federal rules that may 

duplicate, overlap, or conflict with the 

proposed rule. 

The FAA is unaware that the rule 

would overlap, duplicate, or conflict 

with existing federal rules. 

6. Significant Alternatives 

Considered. 

Maintain the status quo: Continue to 

allow all flights to occur without 

requiring steps to manage the risks to 

these operations from insurgent activity 

or an approval or exemption from the 

FAA. 

The FAA is responsible for both the 

safety of flight in the United States and 

for the safety of U.S.-registered aircraft 

and U.S. operators throughout the 

world. The FAA rejected this alternative 

and has not identified any significant 

alternatives to the proposed rule which 

accomplish the stated objectives of 

applicable statutes and which minimize 

any significant economic impact of the 

proposed rule on small entities. 

The FAA has determined that the 

proposed rule would have a significant 

economic impact on a substantial 

number of small entities. Therefore, we 

have prepared the above Supplemental 

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis. We 

solicit comments on this determination. 

We also solicit comments on the 

analysis of the number of small entities 

that would be affected, the economic 

impact of the proposed regulation on 

these small entities, and whether there 

are any less burdensome alternatives 

that still meet the agency’s statutory 

objectives. 

Additional Information 

Comments Invited 

The FAA invites interested persons to 

participate in this rulemaking by 

submitting written comments, data, or 

views. The most helpful comments will 

reference a specific portion of the 

Supplemental Regulatory Flexibility 

Analysis or related rulemaking 

document, explain the reason for any 

recommended change, and include 

supporting data. To ensure the docket 

does not contain duplicate comments, 

please submit a single copy of your 

written or electronic comments only one 

time. 

All comments we receive will be filed 

in the docket, as well as a report 

summarizing each substantive public 

contact with FAA personnel concerning 

the proposed rulemaking. Before acting 

on the proposal, we will consider all 

comments we receive on or before the 

closing date for comments. We will 

consider comments filed after the 

comment period has closed if it is 

possible to do so without incurring 

expense or delay. We may make changes 

to the proposal in light of the comments 

we receive. 

Proprietary or Confidential Business 

Information 

Do not file in the docket information 

that you consider to be proprietary or 

confidential business information. Send 

or deliver this information directly to 

the person identified in the FOR FURTHER

INFORMATION CONTACT section of this 

document. You must mark the 

information that you consider 

proprietary or confidential. If you send 

the information on a disk or CD–ROM, 

mark the outside of the disk or CD–ROM 

and also identify electronically within 

the disk or CD–ROM the specific 

information that is proprietary or 

confidential. 

Under 14 CFR 11.35(b), when we are 

aware of proprietary information filed 

with a comment, we do not place it in 

the docket. We hold it in a separate file 

to which the public does not have 

access, and we place a note in the 

docket that we have received it. If we 

receive a request to examine or copy 

this information, we treat it as any other 

request under the Freedom of 

Information Act (5 U.S.C. 552). We 

process such a request under the DOT 

procedures found in 49 CFR part 7. 

Availability of Rulemaking Documents 

You can get an electronic copy of 

rulemaking documents using the 

Internet by— 

1. Searching the Federal eRulemaking 

Portal (http://www.regulations.gov); 

2. Visiting the FAA’s Regulations and 

Policies web page at http:// 

www.faa.gov/regulations_policies; or 

3. Accessing the Government Printing 

Office’s web page at http:// 

www.gpoaccess.gov/fr/index.html. 

You can also get a copy by sending a 

request to the Federal Aviation 

Administration, Office of Rulemaking, 

ARM–1, 800 Independence Avenue, 

SW., Washington, DC 20591, or by 

calling (202) 267–9680. Make sure to 

identify the docket or SFAR number of 

this rulemaking. 

You may access all documents the 

FAA considered in developing the 

proposed rule, including economic 

analyses and technical reports, from the 

internet through the Federal 

eRulemaking Portal referenced in 

paragraph (1). 

Issued in Washington, DC, on July 15, 

2010. 

Pamela Hamilton-Powell, 

Director, Office of Rulemaking. 

[FR Doc. 2010–17762 Filed 7–19–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY 

COMMISSION 

16 CFR Part 1218 

RIN 3041–AC81 

Safety Standard for Bassinets and 

Cradles 

AGENCY: Consumer Product Safety 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice of reopening of comment 

period. 

SUMMARY: The Consumer Product Safety 

Commission (‘‘CPSC’’ or ‘‘Commission’’) 

is reopening the comment period for its 

proposed rule on the Safety Standard for 

Bassinets and Cradles. The reopened 

comment period will expire on 

September 10, 2010. 

DATES: Written comments in response to 

this document must be received by the 

Commission no later than September 10, 

2010. 

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, 

identified by Docket No. CPSC–2010– 

0028, by any of the following methods: 

Electronic Submissions 

Submit electronic comments in the 

following way: Federal eRulemaking 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with PROPOSALS_PART 1
42018 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 138 / Tuesday, July 20, 2010 / Proposed Rules 

Portal: http://www.regulations.gov. 

Follow the instructions for submitting 

comments. To ensure timely processing 

of comments, the Commission is no 

longer accepting comments submitted 

by electronic mail (e-mail) except 

through http://www.regulations.gov. 

Written Submissions 

Submit written submissions in the 

following way: 

Mail/Hand delivery/Courier (for paper 

(preferably in five copies), disk, or CD– 

ROM submissions), to: Office of the 

Secretary, Consumer Product Safety 

Commission, Room 502, 4330 East West 

Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814; 

telephone (301) 504–7923. 

Instructions: All submissions received 

must include the agency name and 

docket number for this rulemaking. All 

comments received may be posted 

without change, including any personal 

identifiers, contact information, or other 

personal information provided, to 

http://www.regulations.gov. Do not 

submit confidential business 

information, trade secret information, or 

other sensitive or protected information 

electronically; if furnished at all, such 

information should be submitted in 

writing. 

Docket: For access to the docket to 

read background comments or 

comments received, go to http:// 

www.regulations.gov. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For 

information about submitting 

comments, call or write to Rockelle 

Hammond, Office of the Secretary, 

Consumer Product Safety Commission, 

Bethesda, MD 20814; telephone (301) 

504–6833. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On April 

28, 2010, the Commission published a 

notice of proposed rulemaking (‘‘NPR’’) 

in the Federal Register titled, ‘‘Safety 

Standard for Bassinets and Cradles’’ (75 

FR 22303). The Commission issued the 

NPR pursuant to section 104(b) of the 

Consumer Product Safety Improvement 

Act of 2008 (‘‘CPSIA’’) which requires 

the Commission to promulgate 

consumer product safety standards for 

durable infant or toddler products. 

These standards are to be ‘‘substantially 

the same as’’ applicable voluntary 

standards or more stringent than the 

voluntary standard if the Commission 

concludes that more stringent 

requirements would further reduce the 

risk of injury associated with the 

product. The NPR proposed a more 

stringent safety standard for bassinets 

and cradles that will further reduce the 

risk of injury associated with these 

products. The NPR provided a 75-day 

public comment period which ended on 

July 12, 2010. 

Although the NPR was posted on the 

CPSC’s Web site at the same time it was 

published in the Federal Register, the 

NPR was not posted on the 

regulations.gov Web site until June 23, 

2010. Additionally, after publication of 

the NPR, Commission staff met with 

various parties concerning test methods 

described in the NPR. The Commission 

is placing summaries of those meetings 

into the administrative record. To 

ensure that all interested parties have 

adequate notice of this NPR and the 

meeting summaries and the ability to 

comment on them, the Commission is 

reopening the docket to continue to 

receive public comments until 

September 10, 2010. 

Dated: July 14, 2010. 

Todd A. Stevenson, 

Secretary, Consumer Product Safety 

Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2010–17596 Filed 7–19–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6355–01–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Parts 52 and 81 

[EPA–R05–OAR–2010–0477; FRL–9176–4] 

Approval and Promulgation of 

Implementation Plans and Designation 

of Areas for Air Quality Planning 

Purposes; Michigan; Redesignation of 

the Allegan County Area to Attainment 

for Ozone 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Proposed rule. 

SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to approve 

Michigan’s request to redesignate the 

Allegan County, Michigan 8-hour ozone 

nonattainment area to attainment for the 

1997 8-hour ozone standard, because 

the request meets the statutory 

requirements for redesignation under 

the Clean Air Act (CAA). The Michigan 

Department of Natural Resources and 

Environment (MDNRE) submitted this 

request on May 24, 2010 and 

supplemented it on June 16, 2010. 

This proposed approval involves 

several related actions. EPA is 

proposing to determine that the Allegan 

County area has attained the 8-hour 

ozone National Ambient Air Quality 

Standard (NAAQS). This determination 

is based on three years of complete, 

quality-assured ambient air quality 

monitoring data for the 2007–2009 

ozone seasons that demonstrate that the 

8-hour ozone NAAQS has been attained 

in the area. Preliminary data available 

for 2010 is consistent with continued 

attainment. EPA is also proposing to 

approve, as a revision to the Michigan 

State Implementation Plan (SIP), the 

State’s plan for maintaining the 8-hour 

ozone NAAQS through 2021 in the area. 

EPA is proposing to approve the 2005 

emissions inventory submitted with the 

redesignation request as meeting the 

comprehensive emissions inventory 

requirement of the CAA for the Allegan 

County area. Finally, EPA is proposing 

to find adequate and approve the State’s 

2021 Motor Vehicle Emission Budgets 

(MVEBs) for the Allegan County area. 

DATES: Comments must be received on 

or before August 19, 2010. 

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, 

identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R05– 

OAR–2010–0477, by one of the 

following methods: 

1. http://www.regulations.gov: Follow 

the on-line instructions for submitting 

comments. 

2. E-mail: bortzer.jay@epa.gov. 

3. Fax: (312) 692–2054. 

4. Mail: Jay Bortzer, Chief, Air 

Programs Branch (AR–18J), U.S. 

Environmental Protection Agency, 77 

West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, 

Illinois 60604. 

5. Hand delivery: Jay Bortzer, Chief, 

Air Programs Branch (AR–18J), U.S. 

Environmental Protection Agency, 77 

West Jackson Boulevard, 18th floor, 

Chicago, Illinois 60604. Such deliveries 

are only accepted during the Regional 

Office normal hours of operation, and 

special arrangements should be made 

for deliveries of boxed information. The 

Regional Office official hours of 

business are Monday through Friday, 

8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., excluding 

Federal holidays. 

Instructions: Direct your comments to 

Docket ID No. EPA–R05–OAR–2010– 

0477. EPA’s policy is that all comments 

received will be included in the public 

docket without change and may be 

made available online at http:// 

www.regulations.gov, including any 

personal information provided, unless 

the comment includes information 

claimed to be Confidential Business 

Information (CBI) or other information 

whose disclosure is restricted by statute. 

Do not submit information that you 

consider to be CBI or otherwise 

protected through http:// 

www.regulations.gov or e-mail. The 

http://www.regulations.gov Web site is 

an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system, which 

means EPA will not know your identity 

or contact information unless you 

provide it in the body of your comment. 

If you send an e-mail comment directly 

to EPA without going through http:// 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with PROPOSALS_PART 1