alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document

Ex. 10.1A

FIRST AMENDMENT TO
EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (the “First Amendment”) is entered into as of August 26, 2021, by and between Pacific City Bank (“Bank”), PCB Bancorp (formerly known as Pacific City Financial Corporation), a California corporation and registered bank holding company (“Company”) and Henry Kim (“Executive”).


WHEREAS, the Bank and Company entered into an Employment Agreement with Executive (the “Agreement”) dated January 1, 2018; and


WHEREAS, Executive, the Bank and Company have agreed to amend the Agreement to extend its term;


NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the Bank and Company and the Executive hereto agree as follows:


1.         Section 4 of the Agreement is amended and restated in its entirety to read as follows:


            Term of Agreement. Subject to the terms and provisions of this Agreement, this Agreement and the period of Executive’s employment shall be deemed to have commenced as of January 1, 2021 and shall continue for a term of five (5) years thereafter until 12:00 midnight December 31, 2026, unless sooner terminated.  If the Bank and Company do not intend to retain Executive as an employee after the Expiration of the Term, the Bank and Company shall give Executive not less than 90 days prior to the expiration of the Term written notice of such decision and upon expiration of the Term after such notice, Executive’s employment and position as an officer and director of the Bank and Company shall cease without further liability of the parties to each other. Executive’s employment and position as an officer and director of the Bank and Company shall also terminate, and the Term of this Agreement will expire, upon Executive’s resignation, retirement, death or Disability, or upon Executive’s Termination for Cause.


2.    All other terms and conditions of the Agreement to remain in full force and effect.















[Signature page to First Amendment to Employment Agreement]

            IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this First Agreement as of the day and year first above written.


												
	THE EXECUTIVE		PACIFIC CITY BANK
				
	/s/ Henry Kim		By:	/s/ Sang Young Lee
	Henry Kim			Sang Young Lee
				Chairman of the Board
				
			PCB BANCORP
				
			By:	/s/ Sang Young Lee
				Sang Young Lee
				Chairman of the Board
`[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 234 Reported in House (RH)]






                                                  House Calendar No. 80
106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 234

                          [Report No. 106-213]

Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the 
   bill (H.R. 775) to establish certain procedures for civil actions 
brought for damages relating to the failure of any device or system to 
process or otherwise deal with the transition from the year 1999 to the 
                   year 2000, and for other purposes.


_______________________________________________________________________


                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 30, 1999

    Mr. Dreier, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION


 
Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the 
   bill (H.R. 775) to establish certain procedures for civil actions 
brought for damages relating to the failure of any device or system to 
process or otherwise deal with the transition from the year 1999 to the 
                   year 2000, and for other purposes.

    Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in 
order to consider the conference report to accompany the bill (H.R. 
775) to establish certain procedures for civil actions brought for 
damages relating to the failure of any device or system to process or 
otherwise deal with the transition from the year 1999 to the year 2000, 
and for other purposes. All points of order against the conference 
report and against its consideration are waived. The conference report 
shall be considered as read.
                                     





                                                  House Calendar No. 80

106th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                              H. RES. 234

                          [Report No. 106-213]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the 
   bill (H.R. 775) to establish certain procedures for civil actions 
brought for damages relating to the failure of any device or system to 
process or otherwise deal with the transition from the year 1999 to the 
                   year 2000, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             June 30, 1999

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed`
# C_2013134EN.01005301.xml

| 14.5.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 134/53 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.5.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 134/53

---

Closure of complaint CHAP(2012) 1860

2013/C 134/12

Following the proposal to close the case published in the
  Official Journal of the European Union C 57/17 of 27 February 2013 and given the absence of a response from complainants within the month allowed, the Commission confirms the closure of complaints registered under reference CHAP(2012) 1860 against new legislation in Poland on the State-owned agricultural estate management limiting the size of agricultural land leased to farmers and an obligation for leaseholders to purchase farms within certain time.

Official Journal of the European Union

---
### §2614. Emergency communications equipment: acceptance from local public safety agencies for temporary use related to disasters

(a) Authority to Accept Equipment.—(1) Subject to subsection (c), the Secretary concerned—

(1) may accept communications equipment for use in coordinating joint response and recovery operations with public safety agencies in the event of a disaster; and

(2) may accept services related to the operation and maintenance of such equipment.

(b) Regulations.—The authority under subsection (a) shall be exercised under regulations prescribed by the Secretary of Defense.

(c) Limitations.—(1) Equipment may be accepted under subsection (a)(1) only to the extent that communications equipment under the control of the Secretary concerned at the potential disaster response site is inadequate to meet military requirements for communicating with public safety agencies during the period of response to the disaster.

(2) Services may be accepted under subsection (a)(2) related to the operation and maintenance of communications equipment only to the extent that the necessary capabilities are not available to the military commander having custody of the equipment.

(d) Liability.—A person providing services accepted under this section may not be considered, by reason of the provision of such services, to be an officer, employee, or agent of the United States for any purpose.

(Added Pub. L. 108–375, div. A, title X, §1051(a), Oct. 28, 2004, 118 Stat. 2053, §2613; renumbered §2614 and amended Pub. L. 109–364, div. A, title X, §1071(a)(19)(A), Oct. 17, 2006, 120 Stat. 2399.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2006—Pub. L. 109–364 renumbered section 2613 of this title as this section and redesignated the second subsec. (c) as (d).
# C_2017201EN.01000801.xml

| 24.6.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 201/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.6.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 201/8

---

Corrigendum to the List of national authorities designed according to the provision in Article 30(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 515/97 on mutual assistance between the administrative authorities of the Member States and cooperation between the latter and the Commission to ensure the correct application of the law on customs and agricultural matters

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 366 of 14 December 2013
  )

Official Journal of the European Union C 366 of 14 December 2013

(2017/C 201/07)

On page 28, in the table, the following text is added to List B:

| Organisation code | Organisation description | MS | CIS-EU | FIDE-EU |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| ‘DE_BMF_GZD_DVIII | Zollkriminalamt -ZKA- | DE | 62 | 46 |
| DE_BMF_GZD_DVIII_ZFABerlin-Brandenburg | Zollfahndungsamt Berlin-Brandenburg | DE | 2 | 45 |
| DE_BMF_GZD_DVIII_ZFADresden | Zollfahndungsamt Dresden | DE | 1 | 51 |
| DE_BMF_GZD_DVIII_ZFAEssen | Zollfahndungsamt Essen | DE | 5 | 65 |
| DE_BMF_GZD_DVIII_ZFAFrankfurt | Zollfahndungsamt Frankfurt am Main | DE | | 59 |
| DE_BMF_GZD_DVIII_ZFAHamburg | Zollfahndungsamt Hamburg | DE | 15 | 77 |
| DE_BMF_GZD_DVIII_ZFAHannover | Zollfahndungsamt Hannover | DE | 4 | 67 |
| DE_BMF_GZD_DVIII_ZFAMuenchen | Zollfahndungsamt München | DE | 14 | 46 |
| DE_BMF_GZD_DVIII_ZFAStuttgart | Zollfahndungsamt Stuttgart | DE | | 36’ |

Organisation code

Organisation description

MS

CIS-EU

FIDE-EU

‘DE_BMF_GZD_DVIII

DE_BMF_GZD_DVIII

Zollkriminalamt -ZKA-

Zollkriminalamt -ZKA-

DE

DE

62

62

46

46

DE_BMF_GZD_DVIII_ZFABerlin-Brandenburg

DE_BMF_GZD_DVIII_ZFABerlin-Brandenburg

Zollfahndungsamt Berlin-Brandenburg

Zollfahndungsamt Berlin-Brandenburg

DE

DE

2

2

45

45

DE_BMF_GZD_DVIII_ZFADresden

DE_BMF_GZD_DVIII_ZFADresden

Zollfahndungsamt Dresden

Zollfahndungsamt Dresden

DE

DE

1

1

51

51

DE_BMF_GZD_DVIII_ZFAEssen

DE_BMF_GZD_DVIII_ZFAEssen

Zollfahndungsamt Essen

Zollfahndungsamt Essen

DE

DE

5

5

65

65

DE_BMF_GZD_DVIII_ZFAFrankfurt

DE_BMF_GZD_DVIII_ZFAFrankfurt

Zollfahndungsamt Frankfurt am Main

Zollfahndungsamt Frankfurt am Main

DE

DE

59

59

DE_BMF_GZD_DVIII_ZFAHamburg

DE_BMF_GZD_DVIII_ZFAHamburg

Zollfahndungsamt Hamburg

Zollfahndungsamt Hamburg

DE

DE

15

15

77

77

DE_BMF_GZD_DVIII_ZFAHannover

DE_BMF_GZD_DVIII_ZFAHannover

Zollfahndungsamt Hannover

Zollfahndungsamt Hannover

DE

DE

4

4

67

67

DE_BMF_GZD_DVIII_ZFAMuenchen

DE_BMF_GZD_DVIII_ZFAMuenchen

Zollfahndungsamt München

Zollfahndungsamt München

DE

DE

14

14

46

46

DE_BMF_GZD_DVIII_ZFAStuttgart

DE_BMF_GZD_DVIII_ZFAStuttgart

Zollfahndungsamt Stuttgart

Zollfahndungsamt Stuttgart

DE

DE

36’

36

on page 32, in the table:

for:

for:

| ‘Totals | 1 027 | 1 405 ’ |
| --- | --- | --- |

‘Totals

1 027

1 405 ’

read:

read:

| ‘Totals | 1 130 | 1 897 ’ |
| --- | --- | --- |

‘Totals

1 130

1 897 ’

---
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS

ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Global Crossing Limited (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period
ending June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John J. Legere, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to
§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       
|-----------------------
|Date: August 3, 2010   
|                       
|/S/ JOHN J. LEGERE     
|John J. Legere         
|Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 32.2

Statement of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Knight Capital
Group, Inc. (the Company) for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), John B. Howard, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or, 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/    JOHN B. HOWARDName:

John B. HowardTitle:

Chief Financial OfficerDate:

August 9, 2007


This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
### §3843. [Reserved]

(Added Pub. L. 116–283, div. A, title XVIII, §1835(e)(1), Jan. 1, 2021, 134 Stat. 4241; amended Pub. L. 117–81, div. A, title XVII, §1701(i)(7)(B)(i), Dec. 27, 2021, 135 Stat. 2142.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 3843, added Pub. L. 85–861, §1(94), Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1483; amended Pub. L. 86–559, §1(23), June 30, 1960, 74 Stat. 271; Pub. L. 99–145, title XIII, §1303(a)(20)(A), Nov. 8, 1985, 99 Stat. 739, related to transfer or discharge of reserve commissioned officers below grade of major general, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 103–337, div. A, title XVI, §§1629(a)(3), 1691(b)(1), Oct. 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 2963, 3026, effective Oct. 1, 1996. See sections 14509 and 14510 of this title.

#### Amendments

2021—Pub. L. 117–81, §1701(i)(7)(B)(i), amended Pub. L. 116–283, §1835(e)(1), which enacted this section, by adding section 3843 designation and catchline "[Reserved]" and striking out former section 3843 designation and catchline "Contractor internal audit reports: Department of Defense access to, use of, and safeguards and protections for".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2021 Amendment

Amendment made to Pub. L. 116–283 by Pub. L. 117–81, resulting in omission of this section, applicable as if included in the enactment of title XVIII of Pub. L. 116–283 as enacted, see section 1701(a)(2) of Pub. L. 117–81, set out in a note preceding section 3001 of this title and Effective Date note below.

#### Effective Date

Section effective Jan. 1, 2022, with additional provisions for delayed implementation and applicability of existing law, see section 1801(d) of Pub. L. 116–283, set out as an Effective Date of 2021 Amendment note preceding section 3001 of this title.
# C_2013220EN.01000701.xml

| 1.8.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 220/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.8.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 220/7

---

Notice to importers

Imports of tuna products from Thailand into the European Union

2013/C 220/05

The European Commission informs European Union operators that there are reasonable doubts concerning the proper application of the preferential tariff treatment and the applicability of proofs of origin presented in the European Union for canned tuna and frozen tuna loins of HS subheading 160414 imported from Thailand.

It would appear — following a number of investigations — that significant quantities of canned tuna and frozen tuna loins of HS subheading 160414 are declared for release for free circulation in the European Union as having Thai origin, despite not being eligible for such preferential treatment.

European Union operators declaring or presenting proofs of origin for the products mentioned above are therefore advised to take all necessary precautions. This is because the release of the goods in question for free circulation may give rise to a customs debt, lead to fraud and, consequently, negatively affect European Union financial interests. The possible subsequent entry in the accounts of a customs debt resulting from the abovementioned circumstances will be covered by the provisions of the fifth subparagraph of Article 220(2)(b) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 of 12 October 1992 establishing the Community Customs Code (1).

1

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 of 12 October 1992 establishing the Community Customs Code (OJ L 302, 19.10.1992, p. 1).

1

---
#### § 162.225 Will untimely rent payments made under an agricultural lease be subject to interest charges or late payment penalties?

An agricultural lease must specify the rate at which interest will accrue on any rent payment not made by the due date or any other date specified in the lease. A lease may also identify additional late payment penalties that will apply if a rent payment is not made by a specified date. Unless otherwise provided in the lease, such interest charges and late payment penalties will apply in the absence of any specific notice to the tenant from us or the Indian landowners, and the failure to pay such amounts will be treated as a lease violation under § 162.251 of this subpart.
#### § 17.6 Examination of witness.

All testimony taken at the hearing shall be reduced to writing. Any interested party may cross-examine any witness. Attorneys and others will be required to adhere to the rules of evidence of the State of Oklahoma. If, in addition to oral testimony, affidavits or dispositions are introduced, they must be read, and any opposing claimant may require the presence of the affiant, if practicable, either at that or a subsequent hearing, and opportunity shall be given for cross-examination or for having counter interrogatories answered.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 911 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  1st Session

                               H. R. 911

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

  To designate the Federal building located at 310 New Bern Avenue in 
  Raleigh, North Carolina, as the ``Terry Sanford Federal Building''.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 911

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To designate the Federal building located at 310 New Bern Avenue in 
  Raleigh, North Carolina, as the ``Terry Sanford Federal Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The Federal building located at 310 New Bern Avenue in Raleigh, 
North Carolina, shall be known and designated as the ``Terry Sanford 
Federal Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the Federal building referred to in 
section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Terry Sanford 
Federal Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives April 12, 1999.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
#### § 166.202 May an emancipated minor grant a permit?

Yes. An emancipated minor may grant a permit.
#### ANTHONY W. OLIPHANT *v.*COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION

The Supreme Court docket number is SC 17225.

Decided July 7, 2004

*Christopher M. Neary,*deputy assistant public defender, in support of the petition.

*James A. Killen,*senior assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.

The petitioner Anthony W. Oliphant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 83 Conn. App. 10 (AC 23549), is granted, limited to the following issue:

> “Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the habeas court lacked subject matter jurisdiction over the petitioner’s habeas corpus petition?”
April 8, 2014 Page | 1

NCES Response to Public Comments Received Regarding

the State of Preschool Survey 2014-2016 Data Collection

PUBLIC COMMENT 1 – Tariq Aziz

Further education in USA

In today’s times the best country to look for, as a seeker of higher education is The United states of 

America. Although the cost of education can be higher in the USA compared to that of the country you 

belong to... but the other way of looking at it is for the parents is to take it as an investment for the future 

of your child. As once your child reaches the USA he can make a career for himself as there are 

tremendous opportunities here for him to grab on to. The USA has worlds’ highly rated institutions. These 

institutions are leaders in regards to course curriculum and education quality in which they provide. The 

overall quality of education offered in the US colleges and universities is compared as best on the planet. 

The certificate and degree earned from a US college / university is touted as as Hallmark to further career. 

The Universities like MIT, Harvard, CIT, Berkeley, John Hopkins,......... Etc. are the institutions in which 

many dream to get admitted in. These institutions conducting ground breaking research and inventing new 

technologies for the cause of mankind. For more details on further education in USA visit 

http://www.scoregetter.com or email at info@scoregetter.com

NCES RESPONSE TO COMMENT 1

We appreciate the recommendation for postsecondary education in the United States. Early educational 

experiences can help set the foundation for successful elementary, secondary, and ultimately, postsecondary 

educational outcomes. For data on postsecondary education, we recommend visiting http://nces.ed.gov.

PUBLIC COMMENT 2 – Jean Public

this should be done every 5 years. it is not necessary to have this done every year. it is time to clos down 

the high spending going on at the ed dept. 

NCES RESPONSE TO COMMENT 2

We appreciate the concern about public spending and have worked carefully to limit the cost of the data collection 

and data reporting associated with this study. We are not sure how data collection done every 5 years could be 

used to study annual changes in programs and how those relate to regularly changing populations being served. 

To ensure that policy makers have up-to-date information on programs that require substantial investments of 

scarce resources each year, NCES will collect and report the data annually.
### §2156. Joint Forces Staff College: duration of principal course of instruction

(a) Duration.—The duration of the principal course of instruction offered at the Joint Forces Staff College may not be less than 10 weeks of resident instruction.

(b) Definition.—In this section, the term "principal course of instruction" means any course of instruction offered at the Joint Forces Staff College as Phase II joint professional military education.

(Added Pub. L. 108–375, div. A, title V, §532(a)(2), Oct. 28, 2004, 118 Stat. 1900.)