alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §1095g. TRICARE program: waiver of recoupment of erroneous payments caused by administrative error

(a) Waiver of Recoupment.—The Secretary of Defense may waive recoupment from an individual who has benefitted from an erroneous TRICARE payment in a case in which each of the following applies:

(1) The payment was made because of an administrative error by an employee of the Department of Defense or a contractor under the TRICARE program.

(2) The individual (or in the case of a minor, the parent or guardian of the individual) had a good faith, reasonable belief that the individual was entitled to the benefit of such payment under this chapter.

(3) The individual relied on the expectation of such entitlement.

(4) The Secretary determines that a waiver of recoupment of such payment is necessary to prevent an injustice.

(b) Responsibility of Contractor.—In any case in which the Secretary waives recoupment under subsection (a) and the administrative error was on the part of a contractor under the TRICARE program, the Secretary shall, consistent with the requirements and procedures of the applicable contract, impose financial responsibility on the contractor for the erroneous payment.

(c) Finality of Determinations.—Any determination by the Secretary under this section to waive or decline to waive recoupment under subsection (a) is a final determination and shall not be subject to appeal or judicial review.

(Added Pub. L. 114–92, div. A, title VII, §711(a), Nov. 25, 2015, 129 Stat. 864.)
§ 15.301 May funds for funeral services be paid from the decedent's IIM account? ( a ) Before the probate case is submitted to OHA, you may request an amount of no more than $5,000 from the decedent's IIM account if: ( 1 ) You are responsible for making the funeral arrangements on behalf of the family of a decedent who has an IIM account;
( 2 ) You have not received sufficient funds from the decedent's Tribe to pay the entire cost of the funeral arrangements; and
( 3 ) You have an immediate need to pay for funeral arrangements before burial.
( b ) You must apply for funds under paragraph (a) of this section and submit to us an original itemized estimate of the cost of the service to be rendered and the identification of the service provider.
( c ) In response to a request submitted under paragraph (a) of this section, we may approve, without the need for an order from OHA, costs of no more than $5,000 from the date of death IIM account balance that are reasonable and necessary for the burial services, taking into consideration: ( 1 ) The availability of non-trust funds, including availability of any Tribal contribution; and
( 2 ) Any other relevant factors.
[73 FR 67278, Nov. 13, 2008, as amended at 86 FR 72082, Dec. 20, 2021]
Statement Pursuant to Section
906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

The undersigned, Richard Rubin, CEO, CFO and
Chairman of Peregrine Industries, Inc, a Florida corporation, hereby makes the following
certification as required by Section 906(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, with
respect to the following of this report filed pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934: Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31,
2008.

The undersigned certifies that the above
quarterly report fully complies with the requirements of Section 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, and information contained in the above report fairly presents, in
all respects, the financial condition of Peregrine Industries, Inc. and results of its
operations.

Date: February 12, 2009/s/ Richard RubinCEO, CFO and Chairman
Exhibit 99.1


                 CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO
                         18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                          AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 Section 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


  In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Australian-
  Canadian Oil Royalties Ltd. (the "Company") for the quarterly period
  ended September 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Ely Sakhai, Chairman of
  the Board and President of the Company, and Robert Kamon, Chief
  Financial Officer and Secretary of the Company, each hereby certifies,
  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
  of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of their knowledge, that:

       1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
       13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

       2)   The information contained in the Report fairly represents, in
       all material respects, the financial condition and result of
       operations of the Company.


  /s/ Ely Sakhai
  -------------------------------------------------
  Ely Sakhai
  Chairman of the Board and President
  November 13, 2002


  /s/ Robert Kamon
  ------------------------------------------------
  Robert Kamon
  Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
  November 13, 2002

  This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required
  by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for
  purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
### Geology of the Sage and Kemmerer 15-minute quadrangles, Lincoln County, Wyoming

By: William Walden RubeySteven S. OrielJoshua I. Tracey

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/pp855

#### Links

- More information:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**                            (html)
-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (3354 pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (8961 pdf)                        
  - **Plate 2**                            (4380 pdf) 
- Superseded Publications:
                                        Preliminary geologic map of Sage quadrangle, Lincoln County, Wyoming(1968)                                    

                                        Preliminary geologic map of Kemmerer quadrangle, Lincoln County, Wyoming(1968)                                    

- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
§ 166.218 How do I acquire a permit through tribal allocation? ( a ) A tribe may allocate grazing privileges on range units containing trust or restricted land which is entirely tribally-owned or which contains only tribal and government land under the control of the tribe.
( b ) A tribe may allocate grazing privileges to its members and to tribally-authorized entities without competitive bidding on tribal and tribally-controlled government land.
( c ) We will implement the tribe's allocation procedure by authorizing the grazing privileges on individually-owned Indian land and government land, subject to the rental rate provisions in § 166.400(b) and (c) of this part.
( d ) A tribe may prescribe the eligibility requirements for allocations 60 days before granting a new permit or before an existing permit expires.
( e ) 120 days before the expiration of existing permits, we will notify the tribe of the 60-day period during which the tribe may prescribe eligibility requirements.
( f ) We will prescribe the eligibility requirements after the expiration of the 60-day period in the event satisfactory action is not taken by the tribe.
( g ) Grazing rental rates for grazing privileges allocated from an existing permit, in whole or in part, must equal or exceed the rates paid by the preceding permittee(s). Tribal members will pay grazing rental rates established by the tribe on tribal lands.
#### Martin O. Walker *v.*Frederick R. Wilson.

Parol *license—revocation.*A parol license by a lessor to his lessee, to remain in possession after the expiration of the lease, made without consideration, is subject to revocation, and will be considered revoked by a subsequent demand of possession.

Appeal from the Superior Court of Chicago; the Hon. Joseph E. Gary, Judge, presiding

This was an action of covenant, brought by Wilson against Walker and others, partners, upon a lease, in which it was sought to recover double rent, under the statute, on the allegation that the defendants, lessees, wilfully held over after the expiration of the lease.

*353A trial resulted in a finding and judgment for the plaintiff, from which the defendant, Walker, appealed.

Mr. Oradiah Jackson, for the appellant.

Messrs. Jones & Gardner, for the appellee.

Mr. Justice Lawrence

delivered the opinion of the Court:

There is no ground in this record for reversing the judgment. The court did not, as we understand the case, allow, double rent. By the terms of the lease the lessees were to pay one half the taxes. They occupied the lot from September, 1865, to May 1, 1868, under their lease, and held over until July 6,1868. It appears, from the testimony of plaintiff’s attorney, that when he presented the bill for one half the taxes of 1867, the lessees refused to pay them, and it is not claimed they ever have paid them. These taxes and single rent, at the rate which the premises are sworn to have been worth, would make the amount of the judgment.

That the lessees held the premises until July 6, can not be denied. They had discontinued their coal business, but they retained possession of the lot, by keeping on it their office, barn, scales, and a quantity of coal which one of the witnesses estimated at a hundred hogsheads. It is suggested the lessor had given them leave, before the lease terminated, to remain in possession in this way, but if so, it was a mere parol license, without consideration, subject to revocation, and was revoked by the formal demand in writing for possession made on the second of May. Besides, whatever permission of this kind was given, related only to the office and scales.

It is unnecessary to consider the question of double rent, as such rent does not seem to have been allowed.

*Judgment affirmed.*
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Forest Service

# AGENCY:

USDA Forest Service.

# ACTION:

Notice; correction.

# SUMMARY:

                        The Forest Service published a notice in the                         **Federal Register**                         on December 29, 2011, concerning the intent to establish an advisory committee and call for nominations. The document contained incorrect dates. The published document contained a due date for nominations of February 13, 2012. The correction is February 21, 2012.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Tony Tooke, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, National Forest System, Ecosystem Management Coordination; telephone: (202) 205-0830, fax: (202) 205-1758, or email:                         *ttooke@fs.fed.us.*                         Individuals who use telecommunication devices for the deaf (TDD) may call the Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1 (800) 877-8339 between 8 a.m. and 8 p.m., Eastern Standard Time, Monday through Friday.                    

## Correction

                        In the                         **Federal Register**                         of December 29, 2011, in FR doc. 2011-33535, on page 81911, in the first column, correct the “Dates” caption to read:                    

                        Written nominations must be received by February 21, 2012. Nominations must contain a completed application packet that includes the nominee's name, resume, and completed form AD-755 (Advisory Committee Membership Background Information). The form AD-755 may be obtained from Forest Service contact person or from the following Web site:                         *http://www.fs.usda.gov/​Internet/​FSE_​DOCUMENTS/​stelprdb5203568.pdf .*                         The package must be sent to the address below.                    

Dated: December 30, 2011.

Pearlie S. Reed,

Assistant Secretary of Administration.

[FR Doc. 2011-33823 Filed 1-4-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410-11-P
# C_2013137EN.01000901.xml

| 16.5.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 137/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.5.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 137/9

---

Notice regarding the application of anti-dumping and anti-subsidy measures in force in the Union following enlargement to include the Republic of Croatia and the possibility of review

2013/C 137/06

When enlargement takes place on 1 July 2013, all anti-dumping and anti-subsidy measures in force will automatically apply to imports into the enlarged 28 Member State Union. Accordingly, these measures will also apply to imports into the Republic of Croatia. On enlargement, there will be a number of pending investigations initiated before 1 July 2013. Should such investigations lead to measures, these will equally apply to imports into the 28 Member State Union.

The Commission gives notice that it is prepared to review anti-dumping and anti-subsidy measures pursuant to Article 11(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 (1) and Article 19 of Regulation (EC) No 597/2009 (2) where any interested party so requests and submits evidence that the measures would have been significantly different if they were based on information including the Republic of Croatia. In this regard, it should be noted that enlargement per se, in the absence of such evidence, is not a sufficient basis for a review to be initiated. Interested parties are invited to visit the Directorate-General for Trade’s trade defence enlargement website:

1

2

(under http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/press/index.cfm?id=880) for further information and for details of a help desk facility.

---

(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 51.

1

(2)  OJ L 188, 18.7.2009, p. 93.

2

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          48,554
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                             146
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    374,248
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                      1,017,907
<ALLOWANCE>                                     11,974
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,621,655
<DEPOSITS>                                   1,061,205
<SHORT-TERM>                                   143,200
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             13,250
<LONG-TERM>                                    301,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           101
<OTHER-SE>                                     102,899
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               1,621,655
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 20,964
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                6,262
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   486
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                27,712
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              10,022
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              17,138
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           10,574
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      750
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 13,097
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,681
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       4,681
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,112
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.32
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.32
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    2.97
<LOANS-NON>                                      2,612
<LOANS-PAST>                                    22,519
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                11,346
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    1,401
<RECOVERIES>                                       729
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               11,974
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            11,974
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsThe Generic Resolution Advisor and Conflict Evaluator (GRACE) for Unmanned Aircraft Detect-And-Avoid SystemsThe paper describes the Generic Resolution Advisor and Conflict Evaluator (GRACE), a novel alerting and guidance algorithm that combines flexibility, robustness, and computational efficiency. GRACE is generic since it was designed without any assumptions regarding temporal or spatial scales, aircraft performance, or its sensor and communication systems. Therefore, GRACE was adopted as a core component of the Java Architecture for Detect-And-Avoid (DAA) Extensibility and Modeling, developed by NASA as a research and modeling tool for Unmanned Aerial Systems Integration in the National Airspace System (NAS). GRACE has been used in a number of real-time and fast-time experiments supporting evolving requirements of DAA research, including parametric studies, NAS-wide simulations, human-in-the-loop experiments, and live flight tests.Document ID20170011450Acquisition SourceAmes Research CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsAbramson, Michael*(Universities Space Research Association Moffett Field, CA, United States)*Refai, Mohamad*(Universities Space Research Association Moffett Field, CA, United States)*Santiago, Confesor*(NASA Ames Research Center Moffett Field, CA, United States)*Date AcquiredDecember 1, 2017Publication DateMay 1, 2017Subject CategoryAir Transportation And SafetyReport/Patent NumberARC-E-DAA-TN42014NASA/TM-2017-219507Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NNA16BD14CDistribution LimitsPublicCopyrightPublic Use Permitted.KeywordsUnmanned Aircraftsimulationdetect and avoidAvailable DownloadsNameType20170011450.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Robin Jackson, Also Known as Renee Johnson, Appellant.

[824 NYS2d 851]

Appeal from a judgment of the Monroe County Court (Patricia D. Marks, J.), rendered September 8, 2003. The judgment convicted defendant, upon her plea of guilty, of assault in the second degree.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting her upon a plea of guilty of assault in the second degree (Penal Law § 120.05 [2]). County Court imposed an enhanced sentence after defendant violated the conditions of her guilty plea by smoking marihuana and failing to appear for sentencing. Assuming, arguendo, that it is preserved for our review, we reject the contention of defendant that the imposition of an enhanced sentence deprived her of her right to due process. The court *1319informed defendant of the allegations concerning the violations of the conditions of the guilty plea and permitted defendant to address those allegations. Under the circumstances, we conclude that the court’s inquiry was sufficient to satisfy the requirements of due process *(see generally People v Outley,*80 NY2d 702, 713 [1993]; *People v Smith,*300 AD2d 1038, 1039 [2002], *lv denied*99 NY2d 632 [2003]; *People v McClemore,*276 AD2d 32, 36 [2000]).

The court advised defendant of the maximum sentence that could be imposed upon a violation of the conditions of the guilty plea, and thus the waiver by defendant of the right to appeal encompasses her further contention that the enhanced sentence is unduly harsh or severe *(see People v Milczakowskyj,*286 AD2d 928 [2001], *lv denied*97 NY2d 657; *cf. People v Trisvan,*8 AD3d 1067 [2004], *lv denied*3 NY3d 682 [2004]). Present—Kehoe, J.E, Martoche, Smith and Pine, JJ.
§ 166.104 What notifications are required that tribal laws apply to permits on Indian agricultural lands? ( a ) Tribes must notify us of the content and effective dates of new tribal laws.
( b ) We will then notify affected Indian landowners and any persons or entities undertaking activities on Indian agricultural lands of the superseding or modifying effect of the tribal law. We will: ( 1 ) Provide individual written notice; or
( 2 ) Post public notice. This notice will be posted at the tribal community building, U.S. Post Office, and/or published in the local newspaper nearest to the Indian lands where activities are occurring.