alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

# USINDOPACOM Statement on DPRK Missile Launch

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command Public Affairs

We are aware of the ballistic missile launch and are consulting closely with our allies and partners. While we have assessed that this event does not pose an immediate threat to U.S. personnel or territory, or to our allies, the missile launches highlight the destabilizing impact of the DPRK’s unlawful WMD and ballistic missile programs. The U.S. commitments to the defense of the Republic of Korea and Japan remain ironclad.

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT
#### Patrick Regan, Respondent, *v.*Milliken Bros. and Charles T. Wills, Appellants.

Second Department,

December 23, 1907.

Practice — dismissal for failure to prosecute.

Where a plaintiff has done nothing to bring an action to trial for three years after issue joined, during which time younger issues have been tried in their regular order, a *pi'ima facie*case of laches is established and the plaintiff is under the burden of showing a good excuse.

Such delay is not excused by the fact that the plaintiff’s attorneys, being copartners when they brought the action, had dissolved the firm and had not agreed as to a substitution until a few weeks before the motion to dismiss for laches.

*73Appeal by the defendants, Milliken Bros, and another, from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the Kings County Special Term and entered in the office of the- clerk of the county of Kings on the 17th day of August, 1907.

*Louis Cohn [Frank V. Johnson*with him on the brief], for the appellants.

*Taylor &*McGinniss, for the respondent.

Rich, J.:

This record presents an appeal by the defendants from an order of the Special Term denying their motion to dismiss the complaint for laches.

It is not disputed that after issue joined the plaintiff for three years has done nothing towards bringing the action to trial, and in the meantime younger.issues have been tried in their regular order. These facts, under section 822 of the Code of Civil Procedure and rule 36 of the General Buies of Practice, established a *prima faoie*case of unreasonable neglect and threw upon the plaintiff the burden of satisfactorily excusing the same. In the affidavit used in opposition to the motion the only reason asserted for the delay is that plaintiff’s attorneys were copartners when they brought the action and in June, 1905, dissolved and until a few weeks before the motion was noticed had not agreed as to substitution in the actions brought by them as copartners. This fact does not in any degree tend to excuse the delay, and does not meet the requirement of the rule that before the court is authorized to exercise its discretion in favor of -a negligent plaintiff it must be made to appear that the neglect to bring the action to trial has not been unreasonable.

The order appealed from must be reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint granted.

Woodward, Gaynor and Miller, J J., concurred; IIirschberg, P. J., not voting. '

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and . defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint granted, with costs.
# C_2013138EN.01001801.xml

| 17.5.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 138/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.5.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 138/18

---

Notice for the attention of the persons to whom restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2010/656/CFSP and in Council Regulation (EC) No 560/2005 concerning restrictive measures against Côte d'Ivoire apply

2013/C 138/07

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

The following information is brought to the attention of the persons that appear in Annex II to Decision 2010/656/CFSP (1) and Annex IA to Regulation (EC) No 560/2005 (2) concerning restrictive measures against Côte d'Ivoire.

1

2

Following a review of the lists of persons appearing in the above annexes, the Council of the European Union has decided that those persons should continue to remain subject to the restrictive measures provided for under that Council Decision and Council Regulation.

The attention of the persons concerned is drawn to the possibility of making an application to the competent authorities of the relevant Member State(s) as indicated in the websites in Annex II of Regulation (EC) No 560/2005, in order to obtain an authorisation, if it is justified, to use frozen funds for basic needs or specific payments (cf. Article 3 of the Regulation).

For the purpose of the Council's next review of the list of persons subject to restrictive measures, the persons concerned may submit a request to the Council before 31 March 2014, together with supporting documentation, that the decision to include them on the said list should be reconsidered, to the following address:

| Council of the European Union |
| --- |
| General Secretariat |
| DG C — Unit 1C (Horizontal Issues) |
| Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175 |
| 1048 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

Council of the European Union

General Secretariat

DG C — Unit 1C (Horizontal Issues)

Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175

1048 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

Attention is also drawn to the possibility for each person concerned of challenging the Council's decision before the General Court of the European Union, in accordance with the conditions laid down in Article 275, second paragraph, and Article 263, fourth and sixth paragraphs, of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.

---

(1)  OJ L 285, 30.10.2010, p. 28.

1

(2)  OJ L 95, 14.4.2005, p. 1.

2

---
EXHIBIT 32 -- Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
              Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sorbanes-Oxley Act of
              2002





                   CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO
                           18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                            AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Australian-Canadian
Oil Royalties Ltd. (the "Company") for the quarterly period ended June 30,
2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), Ely Sakhai, Chairman of the Board and President of the
Company, and Robert Kamon, Secretary and Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best
of their knowledge, that:

(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.




  /s/ Ely Sakhai                                       August 10, 2004
-------------------------------
Ely Sakhai
Chairman of the Board and President




  /s/ Robert Kamon                                     August 10, 2004
-------------------------------
Robert Kamon
Chief Financial Officer and Secretary



This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
### §2668a. Easements: granting restrictive easements in connection with land conveyances

(a) Authority to Include Restrictive Easement.—In connection with the conveyance of real property by the Secretary concerned under any provision of law, the Secretary concerned may grant an easement to an entity specified in subsection (b) restricting future uses of the conveyed real property for a conservation purpose consistent with section 170(h)(4)(A)(iv) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (26 U.S.C. 170(h)(4)(A)(iv)).

(b) Authorized Recipients.—An easement under subsection (a) may be granted only to—

(1) a State or local government; or

(2) a qualified organization, as that term is defined in section 170(h) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (26 U.S.C. 170(h)).

(c) Limitations on Use of Easement Authority.—An easement under subsection (a) may not be granted unless—

(1) the proposed recipient of the easement consents to the receipt of the easement;

(2) the Secretary concerned determines that the easement is in the public interest and the conservation purpose to be promoted by the easement cannot be effectively achieved through the application of State law by the State or a local government without the grant of restrictive easements;

(3) the jurisdiction that encompasses the property to be subject to the easement authorizes the grant of restrictive easements; and

(4) the Secretary can give or assign to a third party the responsibility for monitoring and enforcing easements granted under this section.

(d) Consideration.—Easements granted under this section shall be without consideration from the recipient.

(e) Acreage Limitation.—No easement granted under this section may include more land than is necessary for the easement.

(f) Terms and Conditions.—The grant of an easement under this section shall be subject to such additional terms and conditions as the Secretary concerned considers appropriate to protect the interests of the United States.

(Added Pub. L. 109–364, div. B, title XXVIII, §2823(a), Oct. 17, 2006, 120 Stat. 2475.)
### §2927. Global bulk fuel management and delivery

(a) Responsible Element.—(1) Beginning during the period described in paragraph (2) and permanently thereafter, the United States Transportation Command shall be the element responsible for bulk fuel management and delivery of the Department of Defense on a global basis.

(2) The period described in this paragraph is the period beginning on January 1, 2023, and ending on February 1, 2023.

(b) Coordination With Defense Logistics Agency.—In carrying out the responsibilities specified in subsection (a), the Commander of the United States Transportation Command shall coordinate with the Director of the Defense Logistics Agency.

(c) Rule of Construction.—Except to the extent that, prior to January 1, 2023, a responsibility specified in subsection (a) was a specific function of the Defense Logistics Agency Energy, nothing under this section shall be construed as—

(1) limiting any other function of the Defense Logistics Agency Energy; or

(2) requiring the transfer of any function, personnel, or asset from the Defense Logistics Agency Energy to the United States Transportation Command.

(Added Pub. L. 117–81, div. A, title III, §352(a)(1), Dec. 27, 2021, 135 Stat. 1654.)
#### Ralph Bishop and Dorothy Bishop, His Wife, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Maggie Sullivan, Defendant-Appellant.

Gen. No. 65-61.

Fifth District.

July 9, 1965.

Anthony J. Ventrella, Ventrella & Witrous, of Oak Lawn, for appellant.

*151Richard O. Hart, Hart & Hart, of Benton, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a decree entered by the Circuit Court of Hamilton County on April 10, 1965. Plaintiffs-appellees have filed a motion to strike the report of proceedings and dismiss the appeal.

Notice of appeal with proof of service thereof was filed on April 21, 1965. A praecipe for record, filed April 28, 1965, requested a complete record, including the report of proceedings at the trial. In the absence of an order extending the time for filing the report of proceedings, it should have been filed in the trial court on or before June 10,1965. (Rule 1(1) (c) Uniform Illinois Appellate Court Rules.) The record reflects neither a request for an extension of time nor an order extending it. The report of proceedings was filed in the trial court on June 17, 1965, and in this court on June 18,1965.

 Since the report of proceedings was not timely filed in the trial court, it cannot be considered by this court. Lukas v. Lukas, 381 Ill 429, 45 NE2d 869; Early v. Early, 13 Ill App2d 394, 141 NE2d 758; Hambley v. Conroy, 11 Ill App2d 568, 138 NE2d 64. In the absence of such report, the record presents no questions for review. Under these circumstances, the appropriate order is to strike the report of proceedings and affirm the decree. The report of proceedings is, therefore, ordered stricken and the decree of the circuit court is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.
§ 1000.333 How does a Tribe/Consortium retrocede a program? The Tribe/Consortium must submit: ( a ) A written notice to: ( 1 ) The Office of Self-Governance for BIA programs; or
( 2 ) The appropriate bureau for non-BIA programs; and
( b ) A Tribal resolution or other official action of its governing body.
### §10208. Annual mobilization exercise

(a) The Secretary of Defense shall conduct at least one major mobilization exercise each year. The exercise should be as comprehensive and as realistic as possible and should include the participation of associated active component and reserve component units.

(b) The Secretary shall maintain a plan to test periodically each active component and reserve component unit based in the United States and all interactions of such units, as well as the sustainment of the forces mobilized as part of the exercise, with the objective of permitting an evaluation of the adequacy of resource allocation and planning.

(c)(1) The Secretary shall, beginning in the first fiscal year that begins after the date of the enactment of this subsection, and every five years thereafter, as part of the major mobilization exercise under subsection (a), include the processes of the Selective Service System in preparation for induction of personnel into the armed forces under the Military Selective Service Act (50 U.S.C. 3801 et seq.), and submit to Congress a report on the results of this exercise and evaluation. The report may be submitted in classified form.

(2) The exercise under this subsection—

(A) shall include a review of national mobilization strategic and operational concepts; and

(B) shall include a simulation of a mobilization of all armed forces and reserve units, with plans and processes for incorporating Selective Service System inductees.

(Added Pub. L. 103–337, div. A, title XVI, §1661(a)(1), Oct. 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 2978; amended Pub. L. 117–81, div. A, title V, §527(a), Dec. 27, 2021, 135 Stat. 1689.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The date of the enactment of this subsection, referred to in subsec. (c)(1), is the date of enactment of div. A of Pub. L. 117–81, which was approved Dec. 27, 2021.

The Military Selective Service Act, referred to in subsec. (c)(1), is title I of act June 24, 1948, ch. 625, 62 Stat. 604, which is classified principally to chapter 49 (§3801 et seq.) of Title 50, War and National Defense. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see References in Text note set out under section 3801 of Title 50 and Tables.

#### Prior Provisions

Provisions similar to those in this section were contained in Pub. L. 98–525, title V, §552(e), Oct. 19, 1984, 98 Stat. 2531, which was set out in a note under section 12001 of this title, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 103–337, §1661(a)(3)(B).

#### Amendments

2021—Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 117–81 added subsec. (c).

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Dec. 1, 1994, except as otherwise provided, see section 1691 of Pub. L. 103–337, set out as a note under section 10001 of this title.
### **CHAPTER 733—MISCELLANEOUS RIGHTS AND BENEFITS**

Sec.
7251.
Presentation of United States flag upon retirement.
7252.
Service credit: regular enlisted members; service as an officer to be counted as enlisted service.
7253.
Flying officer rating: qualifications.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**2018**—Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, §808(e)(2)(A), (f)(1), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1839, redesignated chapter 353 of this title as this chapter and items 3681, 3684, and 3691 as 7251, 7252, and 7253, respectively.

**1998**—Pub. L. 105–261, div. A, title VI, §644(a)(2), Oct. 17, 1998, 112 Stat. 2048, added item 3681.

**1994**—Pub. L. 103–337, div. A, title XVI, §1672(b)(6), Oct. 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 3015, struck out item 3686 "Members of Army National Guard of United States: credit for service as members of Army National Guard".

**1986**—Pub. L. 99–661, div. A, title VI, §604(f)(1)(B)(i), Nov. 14, 1986, 100 Stat. 3877, struck out item 3687 "Compensation: members of Army other than of Regular Army; when same as that provided for members of Regular Army".

**1985**—Pub. L. 99–145, title XIII, §1301(b)(1)(B), Nov. 8, 1985, 99 Stat. 735, struck out item 3683 "Service credit: certain service as a nurse, woman medical specialist, or civilian employee of Army Medical Department to be counted".

**1980**—Pub. L. 96–513, title V, §512(7), Dec. 12, 1980, 94 Stat. 2929, struck out item 3689 "Assignments and allotments of pay".

**1971**—Pub. L. 92–168, §1(2), Nov. 24, 1971, 85 Stat. 489, struck out item 3692 "Pilot rating in time of peace: qualifications".

**1968**—Pub. L. 90–235, §§6(a)(3), 7(a)(4), (b)(3), Jan. 2, 1968, 81 Stat. 762, 763, struck out item 3682 "Service credit: officers; service as cadet not counted", item 3685 "Regular Army; Army Reserve: female members; definition of 'dependents' ", item 3690 "Exemption from arrest for debt: enlisted members", and item 3693 "Replacement of certificate of discharge".

**1958**—Pub. L. 85–861, §1(91), Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1482, struck out items 3681 "Army Register: regular officers; service to be listed" and 3688 "Death Gratuity".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Establishment of Breastfeeding Policy for the Department of the Army

Pub. L. 114–92, div. A, title V, §527, Nov. 25, 2015, 129 Stat. 813, provided that: "The Secretary of the Army shall develop a comprehensive policy regarding breastfeeding by female members of the Army who are breastfeeding. At a minimum, the policy shall address the following:

"(1) The provision of a designated room or area that will provide the member with adequate privacy and cleanliness and that includes an electrical outlet to facilitate the use of a breast pump. Restrooms should not be considered an appropriate location.

"(2) An allowance for appropriate breaks, when practicable, to permit the member to breastfeed or utilize a breast pump."
§ 162.324 Must a residential lease specify who receives rental payments? ( a ) A residential lease must specify whether the lessee will make payments directly to the Indian landowners (direct pay) or to us on their behalf.
( b ) The lessee may make payments directly to the Indian landowners if: ( 1 ) The Indian landowners' trust accounts are unencumbered;
( 2 ) There are 10 or fewer beneficial owners; and
( 3 ) One hundred percent of the beneficial owners (including those on whose behalf we have consented) agree to receive payment directly from the lessee at the start of the lease.
( c ) If the lease provides that the lessee will directly pay the Indian landowners, then: ( 1 ) The lease must include provisions for proof of payment upon our request.
( 2 ) When we consent on behalf of an Indian landowner, the lessee must make payment to us on behalf of that landowner.
( 3 ) The lessee must send direct payments to the parties and addresses specified in the lease, unless the lessee receives notice of a change of ownership or address.
( 4 ) Unless the lease provides otherwise, payments may not be made payable directly to anyone other than the Indian landowners.
( 5 ) Direct payments must continue through the duration of the lease, except that: ( i ) The lessee must make all Indian landowners' payments to us if 100 percent of the Indian landowners agree to suspend direct pay and provide us with documentation of their agreement; and
( ii ) The lessee must make an individual Indian landowner's payment to us if that individual Indian landowner who dies, is declared non compos mentis, owes a debt resulting in a trust account encumbrance, or his or her whereabouts become unknown.
MIDLAND CAPITAL HOLDINGS CORPORATION

                                  EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the quarterly report of Midland Capital Holdings
Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending September 30,
2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I Paul Zogas, President and Chief Executive and Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.


Date: November 14, 2003                 BY: /s/ Paul Zogas
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Paul Zogas
                                            President, Chief Executive and
                                            Financial Officer