- 1
- **FINAL SUPPORTING STATEMENT** 
**– PART A**  **RECORDKEEPINGAND REPORTING RELATED TO E15**

**Docket EPA -**  **HQ -**  **OAR -**  **2015 -**  **0202** A. JUSTIFICATION 1. Id entification of the Information Collection a. Title: Recordkeeping and Reporting Related to E15 , EPA I CR No. 2408.0 3 . OMB 2060
- 0675 b. Short characterization: In two recent actions under the Clean Air Act (CAA), EPA granted partial waivers that allow gasoline containing greater than 10 volume percent (vol%) ethanol up to 15 vol% ethanol (E15) to be introduced into commerce for use in model year (MY) 2001 and new er light
- duty motor vehicles, subject to certain conditions. EPA has issued final rule 1 establishing several measures to mitigate misfueling of other vehicles, engines and equipment with E15 and the potential emissions consequences of misfueling. The rule prohibits the use of gasoline containing more than 10 vol% ethanol in vehicles, engines and equipment that are not covered by the partial waiver decisions. The final rule also requires all E15 gasoline fuel dispensers to have a specific label when a re tail stations or wholesale
- purchaser consumer chooses to sell E15. In addition, the rule requires that product transfer documents (PTDs) specifying ethanol content and Reid Vapor Pressure (RVP) accompan y the transfer of gasoline blended with ethanol, an d a survey of retail stations to ensure compliance with these requirements. The rule also modifies the Reformulated Gasoline (RFG) program by updating the Complex Model to allow fuel manufacturers to certify batches of gasoline containing up to 15 vol% ethanol. This I CR supporting statement will addresses r ecordkeeping and reporting related to E15
. EPA finalized four measures to help mitigate misfueling. The recordkeeping and reporting measures in this I CR are related to the four measures, which are: 1. A regulatory

prohibition on misfueling . With adoption of the misfueling prohibition, gasoline and ethanol producers, distributors, retailers and consumers have a legal obligation not to make, distribute, sell or use gasoline containing more than 10 vol% ethanol for (or in) vehicles, engines and equipment not covered by the partial waiver decisions.

1 “ Regulation To Mitigate the Misfueling of Vehicles and Engines With Gasoline Containing Greater Than Ten Volume Percent Ethanol and Modifications to the Reformulated and Conventional Gasoline Programs

– FINAL RULE.” A copy of the rule is available in this docket, EPA
- HQ
- OAR
- 2010
- 0448.- 2
- 2. A pump labeling requirement
. To provide consumers with information at the pump to avoid misfueling, the regulation requires an E15 pump label that reflects man y commenters’ suggestions and our consultation with consumer labeling experts at the Federal Trade Commission (FTC). 2 Before EPA issued its partial waiver decisions, FTC had proposed labels for gasoline
- ethanol blends containing more than 10 vol% ethanol to address issues within its jurisdiction. Commenters on our proposed E15 label urged us to work with FTC to develop a coordinated labeling program to avoid multiple, potentially conflicting labels. Commenters also recommended that we se ek advice from labeling experts. In developing the final labeling requirements, we consulted with FTC consumer labeling experts and other staff about effective label design and potential coordination w ith FTC labels. Since EPA is dictating the content an d appearance of the label, there is no “information collection” except in the narrow circumstance where an individual seeks an alternative label, which must be submitted to EPA for approval. We expect very few (if an y) requests for alternative labels. Ho wever, as described below, we have provided an estimate for this item. EPA’s final E15 label incorporates public and FTC staff suggestions for more simply and effectivel y communicating the information consumers need to avoid misfueling with E15. The lab el also adopted FTC’s color scheme for alternative fuel labels and other aspects of the design of FTC’s gasoline
- ethanol blend labels, such as size, shape, and font, so that the two agencies’ labels could work together as a coordinated labeling scheme for gasoline
- ethanol blends containing more than 10 vol% ethanol. We believe that the final E15 label provides consumers with the key information they need about the appropriate use of E15. The required label in the regulation appears as follows:

2 The FTC has experience designing labels to h elp consumers make informed decisions at the point
- of
- sale. See , e.g. , 16 CFR Part 305 (EnergyGuide and Light Bulb labels); 16 CFR Parts 306 and 309 (Automotive Fuel labels); and 16 CFR Part 423 (Clothing Care labels).- 3
- 3. A product transfer document (PTD) requirement . The final rule included PTD requirements that have been revised and refined in response to public comments to better accomplish their purpose. The fine rule required that PTDs provide pertinent information, and provided a good deal of flexibility in how that information is conveyed to help ensure that fuel producers, distributors and retailers have the information they need to properly

blend, track and label E15. PTDs are commonl y used in the course of busine ss and, once programmed, are generally produced via a quick, automated process. 4. A survey

requirement
. For surveys of whether E15 is being properl y blended and labeled, the final rule provided options that allow the businesses involved to match th e geographic scope of an ongoing survey to their business plans and to share the cost of survey s among themselves as they see fit. The final rule requ ired that survey s collect RVP information for fuel samples labeled as E15 to help ensure implementation o f the waiver condition that E15 be limited to 9.0 psi RVP in the summertime. In the aggregate, these measures will provide strong incentives for fuel providers to properly blend and label E15 and for consumers to avoid misfueling. As discussed below, we believe that most parties will choose to use the existing survey association ( i.e. we expect one respondent and certainl y fewer than nine respondents). However, we have provided an option for doing an individual survey and have priced that option, as desc ribed below.
2. Need For, and Use of, the Collection a. Authority

for the Collection Sections 114 and 208 of the Clean Air Act (CAA), 42 U.S.C. §§ 7414 and 7542, authorize EPA to require recordkeeping and reporting regarding enforcement of the provisions of Title II of the CAA. b. Practical Utility

/Uses of the Data The recordkeepin g and reporting requirements of this regulation will allow EPA to monitor compliance with the E15 labeling rule
. 3. Non - duplication, Consultation, and other Collection Criteria a. Non - duplication Ef forts have been made to eliminate duplication in th is information collection. The information is not considered general in nature and is not found in other databases, directories or sources. The data submitted to EP A is specific to a compan y’ s business practices. b. Public Notice- 4
- EPA has sought comme nt from industry on the cost estimates in section 6(d) of this I CR during the 60 day comment period
. The notice was published March 24, 2015 80 FR 15595. EPA received no comments. c. Consultations We have drawn upon our experience with similar fuels regulations and actual number of respondent who submitted reports in the last collection approved by OMB to develop the estimates in this supporting statement as discussed in section 6(d)

– Estimating th e Respondent Universe

– below. Growth Energy of Washington, D.C., a trade association for renewable fuels producers reviewed the ICR and felt the industry cost was reasonable. d. Effects of Less Frequent Data Collection Less frequent collection of d ata would make it impossible to carry out the provisions of the C lean Air Act
. e. General Guidelines This information collection activity complies with 5 CFR 1320.6, except that respondents would be required to keep certain records for longer than thre e ye ars. Section 40 CFR Part 80.1454(l) requires r ecord r etention for five y ears f rom the d ate the records were created. f. Confidentiality We inform respondents that they may assert claims of business confidentiality (CBI) for information they submi t. Information that is received without a claim of confidentiality

may be made available to the public without further notice to the submitter under 40 CFR § 2.203. g. Sensitive Information This information collection does not require submission of any sensitive information. No personal or private information such as social security numbers, health care, credit card numbers, education or financial information will be collected in this collection.

4. The Respondents and the Information Requested- 5 - a. Respondents/with NAI CS and SI C Codes The respondents are related to the following major group Standard Industrialization Classification (SI C) codes: 2869
- Denatured Alcohol Manufacturing 2911
- Petroleum Refineries 4212
- Gasoline Distributors 5171
- Gasoline Bulk Stations and Terminals 5172
- Gasoline Merchant Wholesalers (except bulk stations, terminals) 5541
- Retailers/Wholesale Purchaser
- consumers The respondents are related to the following major group NAICS codes: 324110
- Petroleum Refineries 325193
- Denatured Alcohol Manufacturing 424710
- Gasoline Bulk Stations and Terminals 424720
- Gasoline Merchant Wholesalers (except bulk stations, terminals)

Using the terminology

associated with E15 , we have assumed the following classes of party , with the number of each in parenthesis:

 Gasoline r efiners (1 50 ) and gasoline/ethanol importers ( 50 ), for a total of 200 parties  Gasoline/ethanol blenders (terminals) (1,000)  Gasoline/e thanol blenders ( carriers ) 800 In addition, retailers and wholesale purchaser consumers may appl y for alternative labels. We only expect a small number of parties to appl y for an alternative labels. Using the terminology associated with E15, we have assumed the following classes of party, with the number of each expected to apply in parenthesis:

• Other retailer (1 )
• Wholesale purchaser
- consumer ( 1 ) The numbers of parties we have estimated are based upon information we have in o ur databases for other fuels programs requiring these parties to regist er (e.g.,- 6
-

reformulated gasoline, renewable fuels standard) under 40 CFR Part 80. We believe our registration databases for existing programs are sufficient to characterize the universe of potential respondents under the E15 labeling rule. R etail ers and wholesale purchaser
- consumers are only required to retain PTDs , and already do so under existing fuels programs for a period of five (5) ye ars . In addition, since such parties normally retain copies of PTDs as customary business practice ( CBP ), we do not estimate any I CR burden for those parties
. b. In formation Requested A) Reporting: The E15 final rule contains information collection provisions that permit a party to apply for approval of an alternative or additional E15 label. We anticipate that this provision may be utilized by

some refiners for their branded retailers, as well as b y some individual retailers and wholesale purchaser
- consumers . However, w e anticipate very

few respondents (applicants) based upon our experience with prior regulations that included provisions for alternative labeling under 40 CFR Part 80 (e.g. oxygenated gasoline labels). It is also quite possible that no part y will request an alternative label. However, we have provided an estimate for this ite m because it is possible we will receive applications for alternative labelin g under this program. A part y may elect to satisfy the survey requirements of this rule individually rather than through using a nationwide, consortium survey option (i.e., they

may elect “Survey Option 1 .” In such circumstances, the individual info rmation collection requirements associated with “Survey Option 1” will apply . Parties that may be subject to survey information collection requirements include gasoline refiners, gasoline and ethanol importers, gasoline and ethanol blenders (including ter minals and carriers), and ethanol producers. We anticipate that few, if any , parties will elect to satisfy the sur vey by choosing “Survey

Option 1 .” When we have offered this option in the past under other 40 CFR Part 80 fuels programs (e.g. RFG), no par ty has elected to do so. Therefore it is quite possible that no party will choose “Survey

Option 1 .” However, we have provided an estimate for this option because the opportunity to choose “Survey

Option 1 ” exists under this program
. Under the terms of the E15 partial waiver, which is separate from the final rule but closely

related to it, fuel and fuel additive manufacturers must submit a written plan to EPA for approval. 3 The plan must include provisions designed to prevent misfueling. The plan mu st be submitted by all fuel and fuel additive manufacturers, regardless of whether a party el ects “Survey Option 1” (individual) or “Survey Option 2” (nationwide). Parties that may

be subject to this information collection item may include gasoline refine rs, gasoline and ethanol importers, gasoline and ethanol blenders (including terminals and carriers), and ethanol producers. These estimates are included in this draft supporting statement
.

3 75 FR 68094, 68149
- 68150 (November 4, 2010).- 7 - Th e final rule contain ed provisions related to product transfe r documents (PTDs). Parties upstream of the retail station or wholesale purchaser
- consumer were required to develop and program new codes and statements for PTDs. This was a one burden requirement and eliminated from the cost estimates in this collection
. These codes will reflect the ethanol content, as well as the Reid Vapor pressure (RVP). Parties subject to this one time burden include gasoline refiners, gasoline importers, and gasoline and ethanol blenders (including terminals and carriers). In addition to the one time burden of establishing/programming codes and statements for PTDs, parties will be required to apply the new codes and statements to PTDs as part of the normal course of business. The application of codes and statements is ty picall y an automated process
. Ty picall y, refiners and wholesale purchaser
- consumers who are not acting as blenders merel y accept PTDs given to them by upstream parties. The following parties may have the burden of applying codes and statements: gasoline refine rs, gasoline importers, gasoline and ethanol blenders (including terminals and carriers). B) Recordkeeping: Parties must retain PTDs and other records related to compliance , such as QA results, for five (5) ye ars. Retention of PTDs is already a cu stomary

business practice ( CBP ) for the industry . In addition, parties are already required to retain these records for five (5) ye ars under existing 40 CFR Part 80 fuels programs. There fore, this final rule imposes no changed or additional recordkeeping burden
. 5. The Information Collected, Agency Activities, Collection Methodology, and In formation Management a. Agency

Activities We are not establishing any periodic compliance reporting provisions under this regulation. The frequency of reporting is determined by the activities of the respondents themselves. The estimates in this I CR for use of PTDs, or application to EPA for an alternative label, are based upon our expectations and experience with similar programs. EPA may request production of records, particularly in situations where a violation is suspected or observed. b. Collection and Methodology and Management Normally , we will not collect records or reports from regulated parties , but we may , particularl y in connection with enforcem ent actions
. A part y may claim that information i t submits to EPA is confidential business information (CBI). In formation claimed as CBI will be stored in appropriatel y controlled areas and will be treated in accordance with 40 CFR Part 2 and EPA policie s and procedures for handling of CBI
. c. Small Entity

Flexibility- 8
- The final rule and its information collection requirements will not have an y substantial impact on small entities
.
d. Collection Schedule Reporting is occasional
. The frequency of reporting is determined by the respondent. 6. Estimating the Burden and Cost of Collection a. Estimating the Respondent Universe We drew upon experience implementing similar regulations among the same and similar entities to develop estimates of the burden associated with this collection. b
. Estimating Respondent Costs (i) Estimating Labor Costs F our labor categories were identified as having involvement: managerial, legal, professional/technical (prof/tech) and clerical. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistic s, M arch 2013 National Industry
- Specific Occupational Employ ment Wage Estimates, mean wages were listed below for the Petroleum and Coal Industry : Wages Managerial $63.74 per hour Legal $82.50 per hour Prof/Tech $56.24 per hour Clerical $17.62 per hour Do ubling for compan y overhead and for convenience, rounding to the nearest dollar, gives the following rates that will be used for this I CR: Total Employer Cost Managerial $128 Legal $165 Prof/Tech $113 Clerical $ 35 The labor mix for each task is assumed to be about 0.05 hour managerial, 0.05 hour legal, 0.7 hour professional/technical, and 0.2 hour technical. This gives an- 9
- average labor cost of about $101 per hour, which will be used in this I CR. Our estimates are summarized in the following table:- 7 -



## DETAILED **ICR ESTIMATES** 

**Collection Type of**  **No. of No. of**  **Total No. of Time Per**  **Cost Per Total Hours**  **Total Cost**  **As sumes:**  **Ac tivity**  **Party Parties**  **Responses Responses**  **Response Hour**  **per Party Hours** 

**Labels -**  **80.1501(b)(5) Other**  **The number of responses for**  **other retailer, WP**  **- C are actual**  **numbers of responses**  **received. Submission of A** **lt. or Retailer**  **1 1**  **1 24**  **101 24**  **2424 Ad**  **ditional Labels for EPA**  **A pproval**  **REPORTING WP**  **- C**  **1 1**  **1 24**  **101 24**  **2424 The response**  **from the Survey As**  **sociation, if chosen will**  **serve as**  **1 report**  **for industry .**  **80.1502(a) Survey**  **As sociation**  **(Nationwide) 1**  **1 1**  **200 101**  **200 20,200**  **Survey Option 1**  **REPORTING**- 8
-

**Survey Option 2**  **– REPORTING**  **- Individually**  **80.1503 -**  **Use of PTDs HOURS:**  **indicating RVP and G Refiner**  **150 22,000**  **3300000 0.0002778**  **101 916.66667**  **92583.33 1 second/**  **and EtOH content G Importer**  **50 22,000**  **1100000 0.0002778**  **101 305.55556**  **30861.11 R**  **eport to log**  **PTD’s (Upstream of terminal)**  **REPORTING PTDs for downstream**  **G/E blender 1,000**  **22,000 22000000**  **0.0002778 101**  **6111.1111 617**  **222.22 indicating RVP and**  **(terminal) EtOH content**  **G/E blender 800**  **22,000 17600000**  **0.0002778 101**  **4888.8889 493**  **777.78 (carrier)**  **Wa iver Plan**  **As sumes 5% or**  **less will submit reports in this**  **collection REPORTING**  **Waiver -**  **Submission G Refiner**  **20 1**  **20 8**  **101 160**  **16160 of Waiver Plan**  **G/E Importer 5**  **1 5**  **8 101**  **40 4040**  **by Fuel and**  **G/E Blender**  **60 1**  **60 8**  **101 480**  **4 8**  **480 Fuel A**  **dditive (terminal)**  **Ma nufacturers**  **G/E Blender 5**  **1 5**  **8 101**  **40 4040**  **(carrier) E Producer**  **10 1**  **1 0**  **8 101**  **80 80**  **80**
**REPORTING TOTALS 2103**  **44000103 13270.22227**  **$ 1,340,292.44**- 9
-

**See NOTES below regarding retention of QA records.**  **RECORDKEEPING TOTA**  **LS 0**  **0 0**  **0 GRA**  **ND TOTA**  **LS 2103**  **440 00103**  **37350.22 $1,340,292.44** 

**NOTES ON THE ESTIMA TES:**  **REPORTING Under survey** 

**option 1**  **, there is assumed to be only one possible respondent (the survey**  **association) which would seek**  **Ap proval**  **of labs. See 80.1502(b )**  **(3)(iii)(B). Since there is only one non**  **- Fed respondent, no burden is included.**  **RECORDKEEPING Parties already** 

**retain PTDs as CBP and under existing fuels programs, so "new" 80.1507(a)(1)(i) represents no added burden. Similarly** **, parties already retain records of QA** 

**assurance, so "new" 80.1507(a)(1)(ii) represents no added burden.**- 10
- c. Estimating the Agency Burden and Cost The annual Agency

burden consist of 0. 10 of a GS
- 13 step 1 professional employee (estimated at $ 181 , 646 including overhead), or $ 18,165 . The burden estimates reviewing twenty (20) survey plans for twent y (20) respondents (whom we estimate will choose “Survey

Option 2.” This also includes the effort of the employee reviewing one survey plan for a survey

c onsortium under “Survey Option 1 .” This assumes a total of 2 4 weeks of burden, including 21 weeks to complete review survey plans (one week each) and three (3) weeks to review and approval alternative labels for a total of sixty (60) respondents. d. Estimating the Respondent Universe We were able to estimate the number of regulated entities drawing upon experience regulating the same or similar entities. EPA expects that only 1 alternative or additional label from retailers and WP
- C party members during this collection
. EPA expects only

1 report f rom “Option 1” survey

association. The se amounts were drawn from actual submission to the Agency during last collection period. Survey Option 2” (nationwide). Parties included gasoline refiners, gasoline and ethanol importers, gasoline and ethanol blenders (including terminals and carriers), and ethanol producers. Less than 10% in each party were included as respondents in the collection which derived from the actual numbers in the Agency ’s DCFUEL data base. For those parties , they have reporting the burden of logging PTD’s, the actual application of a PTD code is an automated process that would take one second or less. There is no added recordkeeping burden in this collection due to information under existing fuel programs are already kept
. e. Bottom L ine Burden Hours and Costs From the tables, we estimate the following totals: The annual burden is estimated as : 2,103 respondents; 44,000,103 responses; and 13 , 270 hours. The annual I CR cost is estimated at $ 1 , 340 , 292 . Total R espondents 2,103 Total Responses 44,000,103 Total Hours 13,270 Total Cost $1,340,292- 11
- f. Reason for Change in Burden We expect there will be a decrease in the total estimated respondents, responses and cost to the industry compared to the ICR currently approved b y OMB. This change in burden is due to no longer requiring the programing of product transfer codes in this collection. The respondent universe decreased from 6,211 to 2,103 , a difference of 4,108 members. The numb er of responses declined from 44,010,211 to 44,000,103 , a difference of 10,108 reports
. This reduced the industry burden hours from 37,350 to 13,270. A contributing factor to the lowering of the industry cost was the salaries quoted in the “Bureau of Labo r Statistics, May 2013 National Industry
- Specific Occupational Employ ment and Wage Estimates, mean wages.” The salaries that assisted in calculating the cost mix had slightly

declined. This change has caused a decrease in the cost per report in this collec tion from $110 per report to $101 per report. The total estimated cost to industry is $1,340,292 a year, the difference of $2,762,234 calculated from the prior collection approved b y OMB. g. Burden Statement The annual public reporting and recordkeepi ng burden for this collection of information is estimated to be 8.5 hours per response. (Note: Most responses under this ICR will consist of the simple application of codes/statements to PTDs, a process that takes less than 1 second. Burden means the total time, effort, or financial resources expended by

persons to generate, maintain, retain, or disclose or provide information to or for a Federal agency . This includes the time needed to review instructions; develop, acquire, install, and utilize technology and s ys tems for the purposes of collecting, validating, and verifying information, processing and maintaining information, and disclosing and providing information; adjust the existing way s to compl y with any previously

applicable in structions and requirements; train personnel to be able to respond to a collection of information; search data sources; complete and review the collection of information; and transmit or otherwise disclose the information. An agency may not conduct or spo nsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. The OMB control numbers for EPA's regulations are listed in 40 CFR part 9 and 48 CFR chapter 15. To comment on th e Agency 's need for this information, the accuracy of the provided burden estimates, an d an y suggested methods for minimizing respondent burden, including the use of automated collection techniques, EPA has established a public docket for this ICR under Docket ID number EPA
- HQ
- OAR
- 2015
- 0202 , which is available for online viewing at www.regulations.gov , or in person viewing at the Air Docket in the EPA Docket Center in Washington, DC (EPA/DC). The docket is locat ed in the EPA West Building, 1301 Constitution Avenue, NW, Room 3334, and is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Eastern Standard Time, Monday through Friday , excluding legal holiday s. The telephone number for the Reading Room is (202) 566
- 1744, and the tel ephone number for the Air Docket is (202) 566
- 1742.- 12
- You may use www.regulations.gov to submit or view public comments, access the index listing of the contents of the public docket, and to access those documents in the public docket that are available electronically . When in the sy stem, select “search,” then key in the Docket ID Number EPA
- HQ
- OAR
- 201 5 - 0202 . Also, you can send comments to the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, 725 17th Street, NW, Washington, D.C. 20503, Attention: Desk Officer for EPA. Please include the EPA Docket ID Number EPA
- HQ
- OAR
- 2015
- 0202 **a**nd OMB Control Number 2060
- 0675 in any correspondence.