alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# US, Multinational Service Members, Ships, Aircraft Meet in Alaska for Northern Edge 23-1

By Tech. Sgt. Jimmie PikePacific Air Forces Public Affairs

JOINT BASE PEARL HARBOR-HICKAM, Hawaii – Thousands of U.S. service members, five ships and more than 150 aircraft are scheduled to participate in Northern Edge 2023 (NE23-1), a joint field training exercise at various locations in and around Alaska, beginning May 4, 2023.United Kingdom and Australian service members will join the U.S. contingent in the U.S. Indo-Pacific Command exercise by providing an opportunity for joint, multinational and multi-domain operations designed to provide high-end, realistic war fighter training, develop and improve joint interoperability, and enhance the combat readiness of participating forces.NE23-1 is a strong example of multilateral cooperation and demonstrates the U.S. commitment to the region by building interoperability, advancing common interests and a commitment to our Allies and partners in ensuring a free and open Indo-Pacific regionOperating locations include Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson, Eielson Air Force Base, Fairbanks International Airport, and Ted Stevens International Airport, among others.The training will take place in and over the Joint Pacific Alaska Range Complex, Gulf of Alaska, and temporary maritime activities area.

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS, THE CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND THE
ACCOMPANYING NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                          51,474
<SECURITIES>                                       477
<RECEIVABLES>                                   30,827
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,016
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                87,658
<PP&E>                                          22,219
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 212,197
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          130,706
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           148
<OTHER-SE>                                      50,408
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   212,197
<SALES>                                         98,727
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                98,727
<CGS>                                           86,125
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   86,125
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                14,419
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,242
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,285)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       386
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (899)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  (257)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,156)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.08)


</TABLE>
### §20503. Removal of officer: action by Secretary upon recommendation of retention board

The Secretary of the Air Force may remove an officer from space force active status if the removal of such officer from space force active status is recommended by a retention board convened under section 20502 of this title.

(Added Pub. L. 118–31, div. A, title XVII, §1719, Dec. 22, 2023, 137 Stat. 661.)
### Distribution of gold and other metals in the Cripple Creek district, Colorado

By: G. B. GottJ. H. McCarthy Jr.G.H. Van SickleJ. B. McHugh

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/pp625A

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (1462 pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (4968 pdf)                        
  - **Plate 2**                            (4329 pdf) 
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
#### § 117.17 Inactive surplus funds accounts.

When the balance of surplus funds to the credit of an adult Indian is less than $300 and when there is no likelihood of its increase within 90 days, the superintendent may disburse the entire balance to the Indian owner for his unrestricted use.
#### § 11.802 Judgment against surety.

Any surety to a bond submits himself or herself to the jurisdiction of the Court of Indian Offenses, and irrevocably appoints the clerk of the court as his or her agent upon whom any papers affecting his or her liability on the bond may be served.
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION WASHINGTON, D.C.

Pensacola Aviation Center, LLC, Complainant


### v. Pensacola International Airport, City ofPensacola, FL Respondent ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) FAA Docket No. 16-12-12

NOTICE OF EXTENSION OF TIME
This matter is before the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) based on the abovereferenced complaint, filed in accordance with FAA Rules of Practicefor Federally-Assisted AirportEnforcementProceedings, 14 CFRPart 16 (Rules ofPractice). Pursuant to the Rules ofPractice, §16.11(a), the date by which the Director, FAA Office ofAirport Compliance and Management Analysis will issue a Director's Determination inthis matter is hereby extended to on orbefore September 21, 2015.

Di ector, Airport Compliance and Management Analysis Date 

### I 'CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY that on July

## ;;45_, 2015, I served via Certifiedmail a true copy of the FAA's Notice ofExtension ofTime, addressed to:
Counsel for Complainant: Leonard D. Kirsch, Esq. McBreen & Kopko 500 NorthBroadway Jericho, NY 11753 Tel: (516) 364-1095 Fax: (516) 364-0612
Counsel for Respondent: Robert J. Williams, Esq. Sclmader Harrison Segal & Lewis, LLP Fifth Avenue Place 120 FifthAvenue, Suite 2700 Pittsburgh, PA 15222-3001 Tel: (412) 577-5223 Fax: (412) 765-3858 Copy to: FAA Part 16 Airport Proceedings Docket FAAAirport Compliance and Management Analysis, (AC0-100)



# ~ 

# --

**.,e)~ ~**  

# e



# 'rorgerso~ Office ofAirport Compliance and

Management Analysis
#### In the Matter of William H. Anderson.

Motion granted, with ten dollars costs.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Team Kunsan Trains to ‘Protect the Pack’ 

By Tech. Sgt. Emili Koonce8th Fighter Wing Public Affairs

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More
### §240f. Audits: selection of service providers for audit services

The Department of Defense shall select service providers for auditing services based on the best value to the Department, as determined by the resource sponsor for an auditing contract, rather than based on the lowest price technically acceptable service provider.

(Added and amended Pub. L. 115–91, div. A, title X, §1002(g)(1), (2), Dec. 12, 2017, 131 Stat. 1542, §254b; renumbered §240f, Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title X, §1002(a)(1)(A), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1945.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Text of section, as added by Pub. L. 115–91, is based on text of section 892 of Pub. L. 114–328, div. A, title VIII, Dec. 23, 2016, 130 Stat. 2324, which was formerly set out as a note under section 2331 of this title, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 115–91, div. A, title X, §1002(g)(3), Dec. 12, 2017, 131 Stat. 1542.

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–232 renumbered section 254b of this title as this section.

2017—Pub. L. 115–91, §1002(g)(2), struck out "and audit readiness services" after "auditing services".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Notification Requirement for Certain Contracts for Audit Services

Pub. L. 115–91, div. A, title X, §1007, Dec. 12, 2017, 131 Stat. 1545, provided that:

"(a) Notification to Congress.—If the Under Secretary of Defense (Comptroller) makes a written finding that a delay in performance of a covered contract while a protest is pending would hinder the annual preparation of audited financial statements for the Department of Defense, and the head of the procuring activity responsible for the award of the covered contract does not authorize the award of the contract (pursuant to section 3553(c)(2) of title 31, United States Code) or the performance of the contract (pursuant to section 3553(d)(3)(C) of such title), the Secretary of Defense shall—

"(1) notify the congressional defense committees [Committees on Armed Services and Appropriations of the Senate and the House of Representatives] within 10 days after such finding is made; and

"(2) describe any steps the Department of Defense plans to take to mitigate any hindrance identified in such finding to the annual preparation of audited financial statements for the Department.

"(b) Covered Contract Defined.—In this section, the term 'covered contract' means a contract for services to perform an audit to comply with the requirements of section 3515 of title 31, United States Code."
### §2168. Defense Language Institute Foreign Language Center: degree of Associate or Bachelor of Arts in foreign language

(a) Subject to subsection (b), the Commandant of the Defense Language Institute may confer—

(1) an Associate of Arts degree in a foreign language upon any graduate of the Foreign Language Center of the Institute who fulfills the requirements for that degree; or

(2) a Bachelor of Arts degree in a foreign language upon any graduate of the Foreign Language Center of the Institute who fulfills the requirements for that degree.

(b) A degree may be conferred upon a student under this section only if the Provost of the Center certifies to the Commandant that the student has satisfied all the requirements prescribed for the degree.

(c) The authority provided by subsection (a) shall be exercised under regulations prescribed by the Secretary of Defense.

(Added Pub. L. 107–107, div. A, title V, §531(a), Dec. 28, 2001, 115 Stat. 1104; amended Pub. L. 117–81, div. A, title V, §556(a), Dec. 27, 2021, 135 Stat. 1739.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2021—Pub. L. 117–81, §556(a)(1), substituted "Associate or Bachelor" for "Associate" in section catchline.

Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 117–81, §556(a)(2), amended subsec. (a) generally. Prior to amendment, subsec. (a) read as follows: "Subject to subsection (b), the Commandant of the Defense Language Institute may confer an Associate of Arts degree in a foreign language upon any graduate of the Foreign Language Center of the Institute who fulfills the requirements for that degree."
Exhibit
32





CERTIFICATIONS
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Ridgewood Electric Power
Trust V (the “Trust”) for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2009, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each
of the undersigned officers of the Trust hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
(section) 1350, as adopted pursuant to (section) 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:


(1)
                The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and
 
 (2)
              The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Trust.











/s/
      Randall D. HolmesName:
                  Randall
      D. HolmesTitle:
                  President
      and Chief Executive Officer
                    (Principal
      Executive Officer)Date:
                  May 11,
      2009








/s/
      Jeffrey H. StrasbergName:
                  Jeffrey
      H. StrasbergTitle:
                  Executive
      Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
                    (Principal
      Financial and Accounting Officer)Date:
                  May 11,
      2009
#### STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff, vs. JOHN HARMON SANNAN, Defendant.

DECISION

No. 10169

DATED this 13th day of May, 1977.

The application of the above-named defendant for a review of the sentence of Twenty years, Twenty years and Five years concurrent imposed on February 16, 1977, was fully heard and after a careful consideration of the entire matter it is decided that:

The sentence be and remain as originally imposed.

We wish to thank Tom Sheehy, of the Montana Defender Project, for his assistance to the defendant and to this Court.

SENTENCE REVIEW DIVISION

Jack L. Green, Chairman; Robert C. Sykes, Peter G. Meloy.
156 So.2d 358

#### Edward DOBBINS v. STATE of Alabama.

8 Div. 146.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

Aug. 29, 1963.

*498Edward Dobbins, pro se.

Richmond M. Flowers, Atty. Gen., and David W. Clark, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.

MERRILL, Justice.

Petitioner filed a petition in this court for leave to file in the Circuit Court of Jackson County, an application for writ of error coram nobis to review his conviction for second degree murder in that court, and the affirmance of the judgment in this court, Dobbins v. State, 274 Ala. 524, 149 So.2d 814.

The grounds asserted in the petition are:

> “1. For that the fonding (sic) of the jury is contrary to the weight of evidence in the case.

> “2. For that the finding of the jury is contrary to the law in the case.

> “3. For that evidence favorable to defendant was suppressed and withheld.

> “4. For that new evidence has been discovered that will prove, beyond all reasonable doubt, that the jury deciding the fate of defendant was rigged and that they had pr-e-determined his fate prior to trial.

> “5. For that new evidence has been discovered that is of such a .nature that had it been known at the time of the trial it would have been sufficient to prevent the verdict and the judgment.”

There are no exhibits, no evidence and the only support given the grounds are statements in petitioner’s argument that he or his wife have some undisclosed evidence in their possession.

This petition, considered in connection with the record, is insufficient cm its face and must be denied. Ex parte Williams, 268 Ala. 535, 108 So.2d 454.

Petition denied.

LIVINGSTON, C. J., and SIMPSON and HARWOOD, JJ., concur.
§ 162.463 What happens if BIA does not meet a deadline for issuing a decision on a lease document? ( a ) If a Superintendent does not meet a deadline for issuing a decision on a lease, assignment, or leasehold mortgage, the parties may file a written notice to compel action with the appropriate Regional Director.
( b ) The Regional Director has 15 days from receiving the notice to: ( 1 ) Issue a decision; or
( 2 ) Order the Superintendent to issue a decision within the time set out in the order.
( c ) The parties may file a written notice to compel action with the BIA Director if: ( 1 ) The Regional Director does not meet the deadline in paragraph (b) of this section;
( 2 ) The Superintendent does not issue a decision within the time set by the Regional Director under paragraph (b)(2) of this section; or
( 3 ) The initial decision on the lease, assignment, or leasehold mortgage is with the Regional Director, and he or she does not meet the deadline for such decision.
( d ) The BIA Director has 15 days from receiving the notice to: ( 1 ) Issue a decision; or
( 2 ) Order the Regional Director or Superintendent to issue a decision within the time set out in the order.
( e ) If the Regional Director or Superintendent does not issue a decision within the time set out in the order under paragraph (d)(2), then the BIA Director must issue a decision within 15 days from the expiration of the time set out in the order.
( f ) The parties may file an appeal from our inaction to the Interior Board of Indian Appeals if the Director does not meet the deadline in paragraph (d) or (e) of this section.
( g ) The provisions of 25 CFR 2.8 do not apply to the inaction of BIA officials with respect to a decision on a lease, amendment, assignment, sublease, or leasehold mortgage under this subpart.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access to publicationsin the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging and locatorservices, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications (CGP). Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event that publicationsare no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Thoracic surgery**
 
Volumes: One | Two
 
SuDoc:D 104.11:SU 7/10/
Item Number:0352-A (online)
CGP systemNumber:001037074
 
December 6, 2017
### §1444a. Regulations regarding payment of annuity to a representative payee

(a) The regulations prescribed pursuant to section 1444(a) of this title shall provide procedures for the payment of an annuity under this subchapter in the case of—

(1) a person for whom a guardian or other fiduciary has been appointed; and

(2) a minor, mentally incompetent, or otherwise legally disabled person for whom a guardian or other fiduciary has not been appointed.

(b) Those regulations may include the provisions set out in section 1455(d)(2) of this title.

(c) An annuity paid to a person on behalf of an annuitant in accordance with the regulations prescribed pursuant to subsection (a) discharges the obligation of the United States for payment to the annuitant of the amount of the annuity so paid.

(Added Pub. L. 102–190, div. A, title VI, §654(b)(1), Dec. 5, 1991, 105 Stat. 1390; amended Pub. L. 105–85, div. A, title X, §1073(a)(26), Nov. 18, 1997, 111 Stat. 1901.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1997—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 105–85 substituted "section 1455(d)(2)" for "section 1455(c)".