alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2



Statement of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Knight Capital Group, Inc. (the Company) for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), John B. Howard, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or, 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/    JOHN B. HOWARDName: John B. Howard Title: Chief Financial Officer Date: August 9, 2006




This
certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
§ 603.1 Purpose and scope. ( a ) This part contain the rules the National Capital Planning Commission (NCPC) shall follow to implement a privacy program as required by the Privacy Act of 1974, 5 U.S.C. 552a (Privacy Act or Act) and the privacy provisions of the E-Government Act of 2002 (44 U.S.C. ch. 36) (E-Government Act). These rules should be read together with the Privacy Act and the privacy related provisions of the E-Government Act, which provide additional information respectively about Records maintained on individuals and protections for the privacy of personal information as agencies implement citizen-centered electronic Government.
( b ) Consistent with the requirements of the Privacy Act, the rules in this part apply to all Records maintained by NCPC in a System of Records; the responsibilities of the NCPC to safeguard this information; the procedures by which Individuals may request notification of the existence of a record, request access to Records about themselves, request an amendment to or correction of those Records, and request an accounting of disclosures of those Records by the NCPC; and the procedures by which an Individual may appeal an Adverse Determination.
( c ) Consistent with the privacy related requirements of the E-Government Act, the rules in this part also address the conduct of a privacy impact assessment prior to developing or procuring information technology that collects, maintains, or disseminates information in an identifiable form, initiating a new electronic collection of information in identifiable form for 10 or more persons excluding agencies, instrumentalities or employees of the federal government, or changing an existing System that creates new privacy risks.
( d ) In addition to the rules in this part, the NCPC shall process all Privacy Act Requests for Access to Records in accordance with the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552, and part 602 of this chapter.
Exhibit
8.1



Subsidiaries
of Can-FiteBioPharma Ltd.



The
following table sets forth the name and jurisdiction of incorporation of our subsidiaries.



|Name
    of Subsidiary |  | Jurisdiction
    of
    Incorporation
|---------------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|                       |  |                                      
|OphthaliX
    Inc.     |  | Delaware                             
|                       |  |                                      
|Eye-Fite
    Limited   |  | Israel                               
|                       |  |                                      
|Ultratrend
    Limited |  | England
    and Wales
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Multilateral Naval Exercise Komodo Returns

By Ensign Rebecca Moore

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More
#### Samuel D. Sewell and Harry Sewell, Doing Business under the Firm Name and Style of Sewell Brothers, Respondents, *v.*Charles H. Collison, Appellant.

Second Department,

January 10, 1908.

Evidence — principal and agent — broker’s action for commissions — proof of commissions paid to other brokers.

On the issue as to whether a defendant, sued for commissions for procuring a sale of land, was guilty bf bad faith in terminating the plaintiff’s employment and selling the property through other brokers to the same person produced by the .plaintiff, the defendant may show that he paid commissions to the brokers through whom the sale was finally effected. The evidence is relevant, as it tends to. show that the defendant did not terminate the plaintiff's agency for the purpose of avoiding payment of commissions. .

Appeal by the defendant, Charles H. Collison, from a judgment of the Municipal Court of the city of New-York, borough of Richmond, iii favor, of the plaintiffs, rendered on the 11th day of June 1907.

*Ernest M. Garbe,*for the appellant.

*John M. Braisted,*for the respondents.

Hooker, J.:

The plaintiffs were real estate brokers and have had a judgment against the defendant for the amount of commissions for the sale, of certain real éstate owned by the defendant. It appears that alter the plaintiffs had done considerable work in trying to effectuate a sale of the property,, the defendant withdrew it from their hands and attempted to terminate the agency, and soon afterward sold it to the person whom the plaintiffs had interested and whom the latter had introduced to the defendant. Upon this proof and the incidents that went with it, the plaintiffs charged, upon the trial, that the defendant acted in bad faith in attempting-to terminate the agency, and that his purpose in doing so was to escape the payment of commissions to the- plaintiffs. The sale was actually made through another firm of brokers. On direct examination the defendant was asked: “ Did you -pay Griffith *&*Son ” (the other brokers) “ com*587mission for the sale of this property ? ” The question was objected to by the plaintiffs and the objection was sustained. This ruling of the court was error, for which the judgment must be reversed.

The issue of the purpose of the defendant to escape paying commissions to the plaintiffs was tendered by them. A common method of evidencing design'or plan is, by showing conduct circumstantially indicating it. Evidence of the conduct of the defendant-in paying commissions to other brokers was relevant upon this issue, because the conduct tends to reflect the design or purpose, in that under usual circumstances the defendant would not withdraw the property from one broker for the purpose, of avoiding the payment of commissions, and straightway pay commissions to another broker.

The judgment should be reversed and a new trial ordered, costs to abide the event. . . <

Woodward, Jerks, Gayror and Miller, JJ., concurred.

Judgment of the Municipal Court reversed atid new trial ordered, costs to abide the event.
!" #!$

%

 !" !&'

()

	
	
					

	
	

	
	

			

	

	
		




		

	



	








	

	

	

	


	
	
	





		
	


		

 	
	




	

	




	

		



					
	
	
	
	
	

	
!"
	
	
	

	



	

		


 	
	





		
	

	

			

	


	
	



	


	
#

$


	

	!%	

	#
	
			

&



'
(	

	
	
	
)	

*
		
	



		

	
	
	

+			
$
#	
	







,





	

,


,
	
#

	
,			

	
-		
,			
	
	
		




		
!%%

	,

	

	

	
	
-
	
	

	

	
		



	

'



	

'!%.	(		
	


	
		



	

	

	
		
	


'

	!%	
	
	



	(
/
	



		

		
		

&'(	
	

	
01%




	


	

	

	

	

 	2

	

		

&'(
(
3	
		


	

	




	
!%%
	
		'!%.	(

'


	

0!#
		

	

	
			
#

	








	
	

	
	


	
	


			
		



4/	

	

		



				


	





'

	

	
	$	


	

	





			
	


	

	
			
	









	
	




'

&'(
	


		


		


5

 6
	


	

	

	

	
	


	




 

+			


	
	

 7	


8	
		8
	








	


 



 

		
	
	
		
	




	




(

			

		



	
	


	

		
 		
9




	

$		


 :		

&'('!%.	(
	
	
	

		

	
			



'

&'(	


	

	
	

	

	
	




	
	
		


			

'
	

	
	

	!;%
		#

!#"<<#&'(#=>73
	

	

		'

&'(
	
	

		


		

#
	
			



	


	


??
# C_2013031EN.01001001.xml

| 2.2.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 31/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.2.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 31/10

---

Commission information notice pursuant to Article 16(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community

Establishment of public service obligations in respect of scheduled air services

(Text with EEA relevance)

2013/C 31/08

| Member State | Italy |
| --- | --- |
| Concerned routes | Bolzano–Rome Fiumicino and vice versa |
| Date of entry into force of the public service obligations | 30 June 2013 |
| Address where the text of the invitation to tender and any relevant information and/or documentation related to the modified public service obligation can be obtained | For further information, please contact:





  Ente nazionale per l'aviazione civile (ENAC) |
| Direzione sviluppo trasporto aereo |
| Viale Castro Pretorio 118 |
| 00185 Roma RM |
| ITALIA |
| Tel. +39 0644596564 |
| Fax +39 0644596591 |
| E-mail: osp@enac.gov.it |
| Internet: http://www.mit.gov.it |
| (http://www.mit.gov.it/mit/site.php?c=normativa&o=vd&id=1566&ic_cat=&id_dett=0) |
| http://www.enac.gov.it |

Member State

Italy

Concerned routes

Bolzano–Rome Fiumicino and vice versa

Date of entry into force of the public service obligations

30 June 2013

Address where the text of the invitation to tender and any relevant information and/or documentation related to the modified public service obligation can be obtained

For further information, please contact:

Ente nazionale per l'aviazione civile (ENAC)

Direzione sviluppo trasporto aereo

Viale Castro Pretorio 118

00185 Roma RM

ITALIA

Tel. +39 0644596564

Fax +39 0644596591

E-mail: osp@enac.gov.it

Internet: http://www.mit.gov.it

(http://www.mit.gov.it/mit/site.php?c=normativa&o=vd&id=1566&ic_cat=&id_dett=0)

http://www.enac.gov.it

---
§ 2.2 Administrative Committee of the Federal Register. ( a ) The Administrative Committee of the Federal Register is established by section 1506 of title 44, United States Code.
( b ) The Committee consists of— ( 1 ) The Archivist, or Acting Archivist, of the United States, who is the Chairman;
( 2 ) An officer of the Department of Justice designated by the Attorney General; and
( 3 ) The Public Printer or Acting Public Printer.
( c ) The Director of the Federal Register is the Secretary of the Committee.
( d ) Any material required by law to be filed with the Committee, and any correspondence, inquiries, or other material intended for the Committee or which relate to Federal Register publications shall be sent to the Director of the Federal Register.
Exhibit 13.1



Certification of the Principal Executive
Officer
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with
the annual report of Eros International Plc (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the year ended March 31, 2014, as
amended by Amendment No. 1 on Form 20-F/A, accompanying this Certification, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof, (the “Report”), I, Jyoti Deshpande, Group Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | (1) | I am the Group Chief Executive Officer of the Company;
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------

| | (2) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (3) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: August 20, 2015



/s/ Jyoti Deshpande

Name:   Jyoti Deshpande

Title:     Group Chief Executive
Officer
#### § 115.820 May OTFM transfer money in a returned per capita account to a tribal account?

Funds in a returned per capita account will not automatically be returned to a tribe. However, a tribe may apply under 25 U.S.C. 164 and Public Law 87-283, 75 Stat. 584 (1961), to have the unclaimed per capita funds transferred to its account for the tribe's use after six years have passed from the date of distribution.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 137 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                        April 14, 1999.
    Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in order to 
consider a conference report to accompany the concurrent resolution (H. Con. 
Res. 68) establishing the congressional budget for the United States Government 
for fiscal year 2000 and setting forth appropriate budgetary levels for each of 
the fiscal years 2001 through 2009. All points of order against the conference 
report and against its consideration are waived. The conference report shall be 
considered as read. The conference report shall be debatable for one hour 
equally divided and controlled by chairman and ranking minority member of the 
Committee on the Budget.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
### SUBCHAPTER III—OTHER AUTHORITIES RELATING TO MULTIYEAR CONTRACTS

Sec.
3551.
Multiyear procurement authority: purchase of dinitrogen tetroxide, hydrazine, and hydrazine-related products.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**2021**—Pub. L. 117–81, div. A, title XVII, §1701(k)(4), Dec. 27, 2021, 135 Stat. 2144, amended Pub. L. 116–283, div. A, title XVIII, §1822(e)(1), formerly §1822(t)(1), Jan. 1, 2021, 134 Stat. 4204, which added this analysis, by renumbering such section 1822(t)(1) as 1822(e)(1).
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 1 (Tuesday, January 3, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 144]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-33775]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the 
Government in the Sunshine Act, Public Law 94-409, that the Securities 
and Exchange Commission Advisory Committee on Small and Emerging 
Companies will hold a public telephone meeting on Friday, January 6, 
2012, beginning at 1 p.m. Eastern Standard Time. The meeting will be 
audio webcast on the Commission's Web site at http://www.sec.gov.
    On December 15, 2011, the Commission published notice of the 
Committee meeting (Release No. 33-9285), indicating that the meeting is 
open to the public and inviting the public to submit written comments 
to the Committee. This Sunshine Act notice is being issued because a 
majority of the Commission may attend the meeting.
    The agenda for the meeting includes consideration of a 
recommendation to the Commission on relaxing current restrictions on 
general solicitation and advertising in exempt offerings of securities.
    For further information, please contact the Office of the Secretary 
at (202) 551-5400.

    Dated: December 29, 2011.
Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011-33775 Filed 12-29-11; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
HTML Editor


Exhibit 10.9


 


 


FIRST AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


 


This First Amendment to Employment Agreement (this “Amendment”), dated this 24th day of September 2021 (the "Effective Date"), is entered into by and between BioCryst Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the “Company”) and Dr. Helen Thackray ( “Employee”).


 


RECITALS


 


WHEREAS, the Company and Employee are parties to that Employment Agreement, dated as of February 18, 2021 (the “Employment Agreement”); and


 


WHEREAS, the parties wish to amend the terms of the Employment Agreement, as set forth herein, effective as of the date hereof.


 


NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants contained herein and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows:


 


1.         Section 2(b).  The last sentence of Section 2(b) is hereby amended and restated in its entirety as follows:


 


Employee must be employed by the Company at the time Incentive Compensation payments are paid in order to receive the Incentive Compensation payment for each fiscal year.


 


2.         Section 6(b).  Section 6(b) is hereby amended and restated in its entirety as follows:


 


Assignability.  This Agreement may not be assigned without prior written consent of the parties hereto, except that the Company may assign this Agreement to a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company without prior written consent of Employee. To the extent allowable pursuant to this Agreement, this Agreement shall be binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of each of the parties hereto and their respective executors, administrators, personal representatives, heirs, successors and assigns.


 


3.         Continuation of Employment Agreement. Except as otherwise expressly provided herein, all of the terms and provisions of the Employment Agreement shall remain in full force and effect and this Employment Amendment shall not amend or modify any other rights, powers, duties, or obligations of any party to the Employment Agreement.


 


4.         Complete Agreement. This Amendment and the Employment Agreement contain the entire agreement between the parties hereto with respect to the matters contained herein and supersedes and replaces any prior agreement between the parties with respect to the matters set forth in this Amendment.


 





 










 








 


5.         Counterparts. This Amendment may be executed in any number of counterparts and any such counterparts may be transmitted by electronic transmission, and each of such counterparts, whether an original or an electronic or ".pdf" of an original, shall be deemed to be an original and all of such counterparts together shall constitute a single agreement.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment, on the date first set forth above.


 


 


 


	
			EMPLOYEE

				 	
			BIOCRYST

			
	 	 	
			PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.

			
	 	 	 
	
			/s/ Helen Thackray

				 	
			By:

				
			/s/ Jon Stonehouse

				 
	
			Helen Thackray

				 	 	
			Jon Stonehouse

				 
	 	 	 	
			Chief Executive Officer
**Exhibit 13.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED**

**PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

** **

The undersigned, who is carrying out the functions of chief financialofficer for Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. (the “Partnership”) pursuant to the Master Services Agreement, herebycertifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to hisknowledge, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, (i) the annual report of the Partnershipon Form 20-F, as amended by Amendment No. 1 on Form 20-F/A, for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018 (the “AnnualReport”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,and (ii) the information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition andresults of operations of the Partnership.

 

Dated: March 1, 2019

   

| /s/ Wyatt Hartley |                                                                   |
|------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Name:                  | Wyatt Hartley                                                          |   |
| Title:                 | Chief Financial Officer of the Service Provider, BRP Energy Group L.P. |   |
#### § 103.20 What is interest subsidy?

Interest subsidy is a payment BIA makes for the benefit of the borrower, to reimburse part of the interest payments the borrower has made on a loan guaranteed or insured under the Program. It is available to borrowers whose projected or historical earnings before interest and taxes, after adjustment for extraordinary items, is less than the industry norm.
EXHIBIT 32.2

Statement of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Knight Capital Group, Inc. (the Company) for the
quarter ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Steven Bisgay, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or, 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/S/    STEVEN BISGAYName: Steven BisgayTitle:    Chief Financial OfficerDate:   August 7, 2009


This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.