**Exhibit 34.1**

**Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

The Manager and Members

CarMax Business Services, LLC: 

Wehave examined management’s assessment, included in the accompanying *Report on Assessment of Compliance with Applicable Servicing Criteria*, that CarMax Business Services, LLC (CarMax) complied with the servicing criteria set forth inItem 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB for all asset-backed securities transactions sponsored by CarMax involving motor vehicle retail installment sales contracts that were commenced with an initial bonafide offer after December 31, 2005 where the related asset-backed securities were outstanding during the fiscal year ended February 28, 2013 (the Platform), except for servicing criteria *1122(d)(1)(iv), 1122(d)(2)(ii), 1122(d)(2)(vi),1122(d)(4)(ix), 1122(d)(4)(x), 1122(d)(4)(xi), 1122(d)(4)(xii), and 1122(d)(4)(xiii)*, which CarMax has determined are not applicable to the activities it performs with respect to the Platform, as of and for the fiscal year endedFebruary 28, 2013. With respect to applicable servicing criteria *1122(d)(2)(iii) and 1122(d)(4)(iii)*, CarMax has determined that there were no activities performed during the fiscal year ended February 28, 2013 with respect to thePlatform, because there were no occurrences of events that would require the Company to perform such activities. Appendix B to the accompanying *Report on Assessment of Compliance with Applicable Servicing Criteria* identifies the individualasset-backed transactions and securities defined by management as constituting the Platform. Management is responsible for CarMax’s compliance with the servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management’sassessment about CarMax’s compliance based on our examination. 

Our examination was conducted in accordance with the standards of thePublic Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about CarMax’s compliance with the servicing criteria specified above and performing such other procedures as weconsidered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing selected asset-backed transactions and securities that comprise the Platform, testing selected servicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whether CarMaxprocessed those selected transactions and performed those selected activities in compliance with the servicing criteria. Furthermore, our procedures were limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed by CarMax during theperiod covered by this report. Our procedures were not designed to determine whether errors may have occurred either prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by CarMax during theperiod covered by this report for the selected transactions or any other transactions. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on CarMax’s compliancewith the servicing criteria. 

As described in the accompanying *Report on Assessment of Compliance with Applicable Servicing Criteria*for servicing criteria *1122(d)(2)(i), 1122(d)(4)(ii), and 1122(d)(4)(vii)*, CarMax has engaged various vendors to perform certain activities required by these servicing criteria. CarMax has determined that none of these vendors are considereda “servicer” as defined in Item 1101(j) of Regulation AB, and CarMax has elected to take responsibility for assessing compliance with the servicing criteria applicable to each vendor as permitted by Interpretation 17.06 of the SECDivision of Corporation Finance Manual of Publicly Available Telephone Interpretations (Interpretation 17.06). As permitted by Interpretation 17.06, CarMax 

has asserted that it has policies and procedures in place designed to provide reasonable assurance that the vendors’ activities comply in all material respects with the servicing criteriaapplicable to each vendor. CarMax is solely responsible for determining that it meets the SEC requirements to apply Interpretation 17.06 for the vendors and related criteria as described in its assertion, and we performed no procedures with respectto CarMax’s eligibility to apply Interpretation 17.06. 

In our opinion, management’s assessment that CarMaxcomplied with the aforementioned servicing criteria, including servicing criteria *1122(d)(2)(i), 1122(d)(4)(ii), and 1122(d)(4)(vii)* for which compliance is determined based on Interpretation 17.06 as described above, as of and for the fiscalyear ended February 28, 2013, is fairly stated, in all material respects. 

/s/ KPMG LLP 

Richmond, Virginia 

May 24, 2013