alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### Ammonites of Early Cretaceous age (Valanginian and Hauterivian) from the Pacific Coast States

By: R. W. Imlay

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/pp334F

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plate:  **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
FILED IN  4th COURT OF APPEALS    SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS03/28/2022 11:21:18 AM      MICHAEL A. CRUZ                Clerk
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# U.S. and Republic of Korea Conduct Bilateral Air Exercise

U.S. Army Garrison Humphreys, Republic of Korea -- U.S. Indo-Pacific Command aircraft B-1B bombers and F-16s conducted a bilateral exercise with Republic of Korea aircraft F-35As on Nov. 5 as part of the previously announced and annual Vigilant Storm training exercise to showcase deterrent capabilities while demonstrating our nations' interoperability.This exercise was conducted to demonstrate our high levels of combat readiness and flexibility, close coordination, and credible deterrent capacity.The U.S. remains committed to peace and prosperity through the region to secure a free and open Indo-Pacific, and our commitment to the defense of the Republic of Korea remains ironclad.

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                       January 6, 1999.
    Resolved, That Jeffrey J. Trandahl of the Commonwealth of Virginia be, and 
is hereby, chosen Clerk of the House of Representatives;
    That Wilson S. Livingood of the Commonwealth of Virginia be, and is hereby, 
chosen Sergeant at Arms of the House of Representatives;
    That James M. Eagen, III, of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, be, and is 
hereby, chosen Chief Administrative Officer of the House of Representatives; and
    That Reverend James David Ford of the Commonwealth of Virginia be, and is 
hereby, chosen Chaplain of the House of Representatives.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Christopher T. Fitzgerald v. Theodore A. Bingham, Police Commissioner of the City of New York. The People of the State of New York ex rel. Frederick W. Unger v. Theodore A. Bing*926ham, Police Commissioner of the City of New York.

Proceedings reversed and felators reinstated.
### §16202. Reserve service: required active duty for training

(a) Selected Reserve.—A person who is required under an agreement under section 16201 of this title to serve in the Selected Reserve shall serve not less than 12 days of active duty for training each year during the period of service required by the agreement.

(b) IRR Service.—A person who is required under an agreement under section 16201 of this title to serve in the Individual Ready Reserve shall serve—

(1) not less than 30 days of initial active duty for training; and

(2) not less than five days of active duty for training each year during the period of service required by the agreement.

(Added Pub. L. 100–180, div. A, title VII, §711(a)(3), Dec. 4, 1987, 101 Stat. 1111, §2129; renumbered §16202 and amended Pub. L. 103–337, div. A, title XVI, §1663(c)(3), (6), Oct. 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 3007, 3008.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1994—Pub. L. 103–337, §1663(c)(3), renumbered section 2129 of this title as this section.

Subsecs. (a), (b). Pub. L. 103–337, §1663(c)(6), substituted "16201" for "2128".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1994 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 103–337 effective Dec. 1, 1994, except as otherwise provided, see section 1691 of Pub. L. 103–337, set out as an Effective Date note under section 10001 of this title.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

MALIK STEVENS,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 126 EAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 13th day of September, 2023

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Cosine Communications, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2009 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Terry R. Gibson, Director, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to
my


knowledge:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
              The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





/s/  Terry R.
    GibsonTerry
      R. GibsonDirector,
      Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial OfficerAugust
      6, 2009
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

 FEBRUARY 28, 2012

JOHN LEY

CLERK

 [DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

 ________________________

 Case No. 09-15097 

Non-Argument Calendar

 ________________________

 D.C. Docket No. 09-00195-CR-T-30-EAJ

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

MISAEL PAREDES, 

 Defendant-Appellant. 

________________________

 Appeal from the United States District Court

 for the Middle District of Florida 

 ________________________

(February 28, 2012)

Before PRYOR, MARTIN and KRAVITCH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Cynthia J. Hernandez, appointed counsel for appellant Misael Paredes in

this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of
Paredes and has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.

Ct. 1396 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that

counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of this appeal is correct. Because

independent reexamination of the entire record reveals no issues of arguable merit,

counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Paredes’s conviction and

sentence are AFFIRMED.

2
#### § 139.4 Deferment of assessments on lands remaining in Indian ownership.

In conformity with the act of July 1, 1932 (47 Stat. 564; U.S.C. 386(a)), no assessment shall be made on behalf of construction costs against Indian-owned land within the project until the Indian title thereto has been extinguished.
§ 103.21 Who applies for interest subsidy payments, and what is the application procedure? ( a ) An eligible lender must request interest subsidy payments on behalf of an eligible borrower, after determining that the borrower qualifies. Typically, the lender should include a request for interest subsidy at the time it applies for a guaranty or insurance coverage under the Program. A request for interest subsidy must be supported by the information required in §§ 103.12 and 103.13 (relating to loan guaranty and insurance coverage applications). BIA approves, returns, or rejects interest subsidy requests in the same manner indicated in § 103.16, based on the factors in § 103.20 and BIA's available resources.
( b ) BIA's approval of interest subsidy for an insured loan may provide for specific limitations on the manner in which the lender and borrower can modify the loan.
#### § 11.209 How does the Court of Indian Offenses dispose of fines?

All money fines imposed for the commission of an offense shall be in the nature of an assessment for the payment of designated court expenses. The fines assessed shall be paid over by the clerk of the court to the disbursing agent of the reservation for deposit as a “special deposit, court funds” to the disbursing agent's official credit in the Treasury of the United States. The disbursing agent shall withdraw such funds, in accordance with existing regulations, upon order of the clerk of the court signed by a judge of the court for the payment of specified expenses. The disbursing agent and the clerk of the court shall keep an account of all such deposits and withdrawals available for public inspection.
**GAO-10-1052R**                      Published: Sep 15, 2010. Publicly Released: Sep 15, 2010.                  

-   
-   
-   
-   

    Jump To:  
-  Elder Abuse 
-  Services for Older Adults 
-  State and Local-Level Drivers and Trends 
-  State and Local Fiscal Projections 
-  Federal Borrowing 
-  Managing the Debt 
-  Summary of Funding Provisions 
-  Auditing the Government's Books 
-  Unpacking the Financial Report 
-  Highlights 
-  Recommendations 
-  Background 
-  About This Work 
-  About This Work 
-  Trends 
-  About the Center 
-  Why It's High Risk 
-  What Remains To Be Done 
-  Key Reports 
-  Newest COVID-Related Reports 
-  AI Use Cases 
-  Flood Insurance 
-  Past Pandemic-Related Reports 
-  CARES Act Oversight Reports 
-  All COVID-19 Reports 
-  Report Suspected Fraud 
-  Subjects 
-  How to Get Notified 
-  Past Reports 
-  Public Health Threats 
-  Explore the FY 2022 and 2023 Funds 
-  Lessons Learned 
-  Agency Reports 
-  Recent Reports 
-  Recommendations 
-  Supplemental Material 
-  Full Report 
-  Additional Data 
-  View Decision 
-  Downloads 
-  Previously Identified Actions 
-  Related Pages 
-  Associated Agencies 
-  Tough Choices and Opportunities Ahead 
-  Americas Fiscal Future Key Areas 
-  Retirement Security Key Areas 
-  Current List 
-  About The High Risk List 
-  Area Ratings 
-  Previous High Risk Products 
-  Search Federal Vacancies 
-  Past Federal Vacancies 
-  Violation Letters 
-  About the Yellow Book 
-  Advisory Council 
-  Related Resources 
-  Comment Letters 
-  Related Publications 
-  Contacts and Resources 
-  Major Issues Facing the Nation 
-  Meeting Strategic Challenges 
-  Additional Resources 
-  Resources 
-  GAO Contacts 
-  Mission Teams 
-  Operations and Staff Offices  
-  Organization Chart  
-  Why a Career at GAO? 
-  Am I Qualified? 
-  Company Culture 
-  Reasonable Accommodations 
-  Video Gallery 
-  Paid Internships 
-  Student Volunteers 
-  Professional Development Program 
-  Advancement 
-  Executive Candidate Program 
-  Summer Associates 
-  Externships 
-  Benefits 
-  Contacts 

Skip to Highlights

## Highlights

Since October 1994, the Export-Import Bank of the United States (Ex-Im) has had statutory authority to provide loans, guarantees, and insurance to help finance U.S. exports of defense articles and services, provided that it determines these items are nonlethal and meant primarily for civilian use (dual-use). These exports, referred to as "dual-use" exports, include such items as vehicles that are used by the military primarily for civilian or humanitarian purposes. Legislation providing this authority requires us to report annually on the end uses of the dual-use exports financed by Ex-Im during the second preceding fiscal year. This report covers Ex-Im financing for dual-use exports in fiscal years 2007 through 2009.

## Full Report

Full Report (5 pages)

Accessible Text 

## Office of Public Affairs

Sarah Kaczmarek
kaczmareks@gao.gov

(202) 512-4800

## Topics

International Affairs

Bank loansExport regulationExportingFinancial managementInsuranceInternational tradeLoansMilitary materielBank servicesExport financeExport promotion
### Cenozoic history of northeastern Montana and northwestern North Dakota with emphasis on the Pleistocene

By: A.D. Howard

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/pp326

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 3**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 4**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 5**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 6**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 7**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 8**                            (pdf) 
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
### SUBCHAPTER I—MILITARY FAMILY PROGRAMS

Sec.
1781.
Office of Military Family Readiness Policy.
1781a.
Department of Defense Military Family Readiness Council.
1781b.
Department of Defense policy and plans for military family readiness.
1781c.
Office of Special Needs.
1782.
Surveys of military families.
1783.
Family members serving on advisory committees.
1784.
Employment opportunities for military spouses.
1784a.
Education and training opportunities for military spouses to expand employment and portable career opportunities.
1785.
Youth sponsorship program.
1786.
Dependent student travel within the United States.
1787.
Reporting of child abuse.
1788.
Additional family assistance.
1788a.
Support programs: special operations forces personnel; immediate family members.
1789.
Chaplain-led programs: authorized support.
1790.
Military personnel citizenship processing.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**2021**—Pub. L. 116–283, div. A, title V, §583(b), Jan. 1, 2021, 134 Stat. 3654, which directed amendment of the table of sections at the beginning of chapter 88 by adding item 1788a and striking out former item 1788a "Family support programs: immediate family members of members of special operations forces", was executed to the analysis of this subchapter, to reflect the probable intent of Congress.

**2017**—Pub. L. 115–91, div. A, title V, §555(e), Dec. 12, 2017, 131 Stat. 1403, added item 1788a.

**2016**—Pub. L. 114–328, div. A, title IX, §933(a)(4)(B), (b)(5)(B), Dec. 23, 2016, 130 Stat. 2364, 2365, substituted "Office of Military Family Readiness Policy" for "Office of Family Policy" in item 1781 and "Office of Special Needs" for "Office of Community Support for Military Families With Special Needs" in item 1781c.

**2011**—Pub. L. 112–74, div. A, title VIII, §8070(b), Dec. 23, 2011, 125 Stat. 823, added item 1790.

**2009**—Pub. L. 111–84, div. A, title V, §563(a)(2), Oct. 28, 2009, 123 Stat. 2307, added item 1781c.

**2008**—Pub. L. 110–417, [div. A], title V, §582(b), Oct. 14, 2008, 122 Stat. 4474, added item 1784a.

Pub. L. 110–181, div. A, title V, §581(d), Jan. 28, 2008, 122 Stat. 122, added items 1781a and 1781b.

**2003**—Pub. L. 108–136, div. A, title V, §582(a)(2), Nov. 24, 2003, 117 Stat. 1490, added item 1789.

**2002**—Pub. L. 107–314, div. A, title VI, §652(a)(2), Dec. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 2581, added item 1788.
-       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2023-02-15T02:13:04-0500
      - Government Publishing Office, Washington, DC 20401
      - Government Publishing Office
      - Government Publishing Office attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by Government Publishing Office
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21

- 6746

DUSTIN M. GRAMMER , Petitioner

- Appellant ,

v. WARDEN, FCI Gilmer , Respondent

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia , at Martinsburg

. Gina M. Groh, Chief District Judge. ( 3:19

- cv - 00057

- GMG )

Submitted : August 24, 2021 Decided: August 27, 2021

Before NIEMEYER and HARRIS , Circuit Judges , and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Dustin M. Gramm e r, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Dustin M. Grammer , a federal prisoner, ap peals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on Grammer’s 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition in which Grammer sought to challenge his sentence by way of the savings clause in 28 U.S.C. § 2255

. Pursuant to § 2255(e), a prisoner may challenge his conviction or sentence in a traditional writ of habeas corpus pursuant to § 2241 if a § 2255 motion would be inadequate or ineffective to test the legality of his detention

. [ Section ] 2255 is inadequate and ineffe ctive to test the legality of a sentence when: (1) at the time of sentencing, settled law of this circuit or the Supreme Court established the legality of the sentence; (2) subsequent to the prisoner’s direct appeal and first § 2255 motion, the aforementio ned settled substantive law changed and was deemed to apply retroactively on collateral review; (3) the prisoner is unable to meet the gatekeeping provisions of § 2255(h)(2) for second or successive motions; and (4) due to this retroactive change, the sent ence now presents an error sufficiently grave to be deemed a fundamental defect.
United States v. Wheeler , 886 F.3d 415, 429 (4th Cir. 2018). Because Grammer was sentenced under the advisory Sentencing Guidelines, we agree with the district court’s conclusion that he fails to satisfy the fourth prong of Wheeler

. See Braswell v. Smith , 952 F.3d 441, 450 (4th Cir. 2020) ; Lester v. Flournoy , 909 F.3d 708, 715 (4th Cir. 2018). Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
Grammer v. Warden , No. 3:19

- cv - 00057

- GMG (N.D.W. Va. Mar. 26, 2021)

. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
#### Lisa Fanek, Appellant, v Dutchess Properties, LLC, Respondent.

[825 NYS2d 124]

In an action, inter alia, to compel specific performance of an option to purchase real property, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Pagones, J.), dated June 13, 2005, which granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiff commenced this action to compel specific performance of a purchase option in a lease. However, in support of its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, the defendant demonstrated, prima facie, both that the lease had been terminated and that the purchase option had not been exercised in accordance with the terms and conditions of the lease *(see Raanan v Tom’s Triangle,*303 AD2d 668 [2003]; *O’Rourke v Carlton,*286 AD2d 427 [2001]). In opposition, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact *(see Alvarez v Prospect Hosp.,*68 NY2d 320 [1986]). Thus, the motion was properly granted. Miller, J.P., Ritter, Spolzino and Dillon, JJ., concur.
### SUBCHAPTER I—DEFENSE EXPORT LOAN GUARANTEES

Sec.
4971.
Establishment of loan guarantee program.
4972.
Transferability.
4973.
Limitations.
4974.
Fees charged and collected.
4975.
Definitions.
§ 115.416 Will the United States post office forward mail regarding a minor's supervised account to a forwarding address left with the United States post office? ( a ) Federal law does not allow the United States post office to forward checks that are issued by the federal government. Therefore, a check from a minor's supervised account will not be forwarded to an address left with the United States post office. The new address of record must be provided directly to BIA.
( b ) Where a forwarding address has been provided to the United States post office, the United States post office will forward a statement of performance and general correspondence regarding a minor's supervised account that is mailed to the minor's address of record for a limited time period. However, it is the responsibility of a custodial parent, legal guardian, or emancipated minor to give BIA the new address of record for the minor's supervised account.