alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 11.1108 Date of hearing. Upon receipt of the minor-in-need-of-care petition, the children's court shall set a date for the hearing which shall not be more than 15 days after the children's court receives the petition from the presenting officer. If the adjudicatory hearing is not held within 15 days after the filing of the petition, it shall be dismissed unless; ( a ) The hearing is continued upon motion of the minor; or
( b ) The hearing is continued upon motion of the presenting officer by reason of the unavailability of material evidence or witnesses and the children's court finds the presenting officer has exercised due diligence to obtain the material evidence or witnesses and reasonable grounds exist to believe that the material evidence or witnesses will become available.
#### Robert Sherman, Respondent, v Libra DeRosa, Appellant.

[825 NYS2d 525]

In an action to recover medical assistance benefits paid on behalf of the defendant’s institutionalized spouse, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Joseph, J.), dated September 22, 2005, which granted the plaintiffs motion to dismiss her affirmative defenses.

Ordered the order is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiff, the Commissioner of the Department of Social Services of the County of Nassau (hereinafter DSS), seeks to recover from the defendant the sum of $108,619.05 in Medicaid benefits it paid for the nursing home care of the defendant’s late husband. The complaint alleges that DSS provided medical assistance payments for the defendant’s husband, that the defendant was legally required to provide support for him, and that the defendant possessed total resources in excess of the allowable resource level but refused to provide for her husband’s care. The Supreme Court dismissed all nine of the affirmative defenses asserted by the defendant in her amended verified answer.

The seventh and eighth affirmative defenses were properly dismissed since the plaintiff’s claim is not barred by the doctrines of res judicata or collateral estoppel. The claim for reimbursement being asserted against the defendant was not *783raised or decided on the merits in a prior guardianship proceeding, nor did plaintiff have a full and fair opportunity to contest the issue in that proceeding *(see Buechel v Bain,*97 NY2d 295 [2001]; *Parker v Blauvelt Volunteer Fire Co.,*93 NY2d 343 [1999]). The remaining affirmative defenses were also properly dismissed since DSS is authorized to bring an action to recover the cost of Medicaid benefits paid for the care of the defendant’s spouse to the extent that the defendant, a responsible relative, has available resources *(see*Social Services Law §§ 104, 366 [3]; *Commissioner of Dept. of Social Servs. of City of N.Y. v Fishman,*280 AD2d 396 [2001]; *Commissioner of Dept. of Social Servs. of City of N.Y. v Spellman,*243 AD2d 45 [1998]; *Matter of Klink,*278 AD2d 883 [2000]). Schmidt, J.P., Adams, Santucci and Lifson, JJ., concur.
#### § 115.819 What steps will be taken to locate an individual whose per capita check is returned as undeliverable or not cashed within twelve (12) months of issuance?

The OTFM will notify a tribe of the names of the individuals whose per capita checks were returned as undeliverable or not cashed within twelve (12) months of issuance and will take reasonable action, including utilizing electronic search tools, to locate the individual entitled to receive the per capita funds.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Naval Vessels Push Marine Amphibious Capabilities During Blue Chromite

By Lance Cpl. Steven Tran

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More News/Articles
# C_2013264EN.01001001.xml

| 13.9.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 264/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.9.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 264/10

---

Notification of the Danish Government pursuant to Article 10(2) of Directive 2009/72/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (‘Electricity Directive’) concerning common rules for the internal market in electricity regarding the designation of Energinet.dk as transmission system operator in Denmark — Electricity TSO

2013/C 264/07

Following the Danish regulatory authority’s final decision of 28 February 2012 regarding the certification of Energinet.dk as ownership unbundled transmission system operator (Article 9 of the Electricity Directive), Denmark has notified to the Commission the official approval and designation of this company as a transmission system operator operating in Denmark in accordance with Article 10 of the Electricity Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council.

Any additional information can be obtained at the following address:

E-mail: ens@ens.dk

http://www.ens.dk

---
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _

Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A1 7 I 0 0 36

. MARI A MATTA-TRONCOSO et a l . v . GREGORY B. TYNER.

Aft er M ari a M at t a-Tro n co s o al l eg ed l y was at t ack ed b y t wo d o g s r u n n i n g

u n l eas h ed i n h er n ei g h b o rh oo d

, s h e an d h er h u s b an d bro u g h t a t o rt act io n ag ai n s t t h e

o wn ers o f t h e d og s an d t h ei r l an d l o rd

, Greg ory B. Ty n er. Th e t ri al co u rt g ran t ed

s u m m a r y j u d g m en t i n fav o r of Ty n er o n t h e is s u e o f p ro x im at e cau s e, an d M at t aTro n co so an d h er h u sb an d s eek i n t erl o cu t o ry rev i ew o f t hat ru l i ng

.

Un d er OCGA § 9 -1 1 -5 6 ( h )

, t h e g ran t of s um m ary ju d g m en t o n an y i s s u e o r

as t o an y p art y i s rev i ewab l e b y d i rect ap p eal . See Ci ty o f Demo r es t v. To wn o

f Mt

.

Ai r y

, 2 8 2 Ga. 6 5 3

, 6 5 4 n .1 (6 5 3 SE2 d 43 ) (2 0 0 7 ); W h i d d o n v. St a rg el l

, 1 9 2 Ga. Ap p.

8 2 6

, 8 2 7 -2 8 (3 8 6 SE2 d 8 8 4 ) ( 1 9 8 9 )

. W e wi l l g ran t a t i m el y ap p li cat i o n fo r

i n t erl o cu t o ry ap p eal i f t h e o rd er co m p l ai n ed o f i s d i rec t l y a p p eal ab l e an d t h e

ap p li can t h as n o t al read y fi l ed a t i m el y no t i ce o f ap p eal

. See S p i vey v. Hemb r ee

, 2 6 8

Ga. Ap p

. 4 8 5

, 4 8 6 n .1 (6 0 2 SE2 d 24 6 ) (2 00 4 ). Acco rd i n gl y

, t h i s i n t erl o cu t o ry

ap p li cat io n i s hereb y GRANTED. Th e ap p li can ts s h al l h av e t en d ay s fro m t h e d at e

o f t h i s o rd er t o fi l e a n o t i ce o f ap p eal i n t h e t ri al co urt

. If t h e ap p li can t s h av e al read y

fi led a n ot i ce o f ap p eal fro m t h e o rd er at i s s u e here, t h ey n eed n o t fi l e a s eco n d n o t i ce.

Th e cl erk o f t h e t ri al co u rt i s d i rect ed t o i ncl u d e a co p y o f t h i s o rd er i n t he reco rd

t ran s m i t t ed t o t h e Co u rt o f Ap p eal s

. October 07, 2016C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia

C le r k ’ s O f f i c e

, A t la n t a

,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r t i f y t h a t t h e a b o v e i s a tr u e e x t r a c t f r o m

t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d t h e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t

h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. 10/07/2016
July 20, 2017

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

HEATHER TENINI KUENTZ, INDIVIDUALLY, AS PERSONAL 

REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF ROBERT MICHAEL KUENTZ, 

DECEASED, AND AS NEXT FRIEND OF B.M.K, A MINOR, LARRY 

MICHAEL “ROBERT” KUENTZ AND SANDRA KUENTZ, Appellants

NO. 14-15-01031-CV V.

COLE SYSTEMS GROUP, INC., D/B/A THE COLE GROUP, Appellee

________________________________

This cause, an appeal from the partial judgment in favor of appellee, Cole 

Systems Group, Inc., d/b/a The Cole Group, signed November 4, 2015 and made 

final by order of dismissal pursuant to non-suit signed December 4, 2015, was heard 

on the transcript of the record. We have inspected the record and find no error in the 

judgment. We order the judgment of the court below AFFIRMED.

We order appellant, Heather Tenini Kuentz, Individually, as Personal 

Representative of the Estate of Robert Michael Kuentz, deceased, and as Next Friend 

of B.M.K., a Minor, Larry Michael “Robert” Kuentz and Sandra Kuentz, jointly and 

severally, to pay all costs incurred in this appeal. 

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
# C_2013354EN.01000801.xml

| 4.12.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 354/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.12.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 354/8

---

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the TFEU

Cases where the Commission raises no objections

(Text with EEA relevance)

2013/C 354/03

| Date of adoption of the decision | 30.9.2013 |
| --- | --- |
| Reference number of State Aid | SA.35949 (12/N) |
| Member State | Poland |
| Region | Łódzkie | — |
| Title (and/or name of the beneficiary) | Łódzka Regionalna Sieć Teleinformatyczna – 2 Etap |
| Legal basis | 1) | Ustawa z dnia 6 grudnia 2006 r. o zasadach prowadzenia polityki rozwoju (Dz.U. nr 84, poz. 712 ze zm.) |

Date of adoption of the decision

30.9.2013

Reference number of State Aid

SA.35949 (12/N)

Member State

Poland

Region

Łódzkie

—

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

Łódzka Regionalna Sieć Teleinformatyczna – 2 Etap

Legal basis

1)

Ustawa z dnia 6 grudnia 2006 r. o zasadach prowadzenia polityki rozwoju (Dz.U. nr 84, poz. 712 ze zm.)

| 2) | Ustawa z dnia 7 maja 2010 r. o wspieraniu rozwoju usług i sieci telekomunikacyjnych (Dz.U. nr 106, poz. 675) |
| --- | --- |

2)

Ustawa z dnia 7 maja 2010 r. o wspieraniu rozwoju usług i sieci telekomunikacyjnych (Dz.U. nr 106, poz. 675)

| 3) | Ustawa z dnia 30 kwietnia 2004 r. o postępowaniu w sprawach dotyczących pomocy publicznej (Dz.U. nr 59, poz. 404 ze zm.) |
| --- | --- |

3)

Ustawa z dnia 30 kwietnia 2004 r. o postępowaniu w sprawach dotyczących pomocy publicznej (Dz.U. nr 59, poz. 404 ze zm.)

| 4) | Regionalny Program Operacyjny Województwa Łódzkiego na lata 2007–2013, zatwierdzony przez Komisję Europejską decyzją z dnia 2 października 2007 r. w sprawie przyjęcia w ramach pomocy wspólnotowej programu operacyjnego Europejskiego Funduszu Rozwoju Regionalnego |
| --- | --- |

4)

Regionalny Program Operacyjny Województwa Łódzkiego na lata 2007–2013, zatwierdzony przez Komisję Europejską decyzją z dnia 2 października 2007 r. w sprawie przyjęcia w ramach pomocy wspólnotowej programu operacyjnego Europejskiego Funduszu Rozwoju Regionalnego

Type of measure

Individual aid

—

Objective

Sectoral development, Regional development

Form of aid

Direct grant

Budget

Overall budget: PLN 25,85 million

Intensity

—

Duration (period)

From 1.10.2013

Economic sectors

Wireless telecommunications activities, Wired telecommunications activities

Name and address of the granting authority

| Województwo Łódzkie |
| --- |
| Al. Piłsudskiego 8 |
| 90-051 Łódź |
| POLSKA/POLAND |

Województwo Łódzkie

Al. Piłsudskiego 8

90-051 Łódź

POLSKA/POLAND

Other information

—

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

http://ec.europa.eu/competition/elojade/isef/index.cfm

---
July 16, 2015



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

TRYMAINE HOLLINS , Appellant
NO. 14

- 14

- 00588

- CR
NO. 14

- 14

- 005 90

- CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

________________________________ This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. Having considered the record, this Court holds that there was no error in the judgment. The Court orders the judgment AFFIRMED

. We further order appellant pay all costs expended in the appeal. We further order this decision certified below for observance.
#### § 15.6 May my will be deemed revoked by operation of the law of any State?

No. A will that is subject to the regulations of this subpart will not be deemed to be revoked by operation of the law of any State.
<PAGE>
                                                                 EXHIBIT 99.1(1)

       STATEMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER UNDER 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

I, William E. McGlashan, Jr., the chief executive officer of Critical Path, Inc.
(the "Company"), certify for the purposes of section 1350 of chapter 63 of title
18 of the United States Code that, to my knowledge,:

(i) the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period
ended March 31, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: May 15, 2003
                                                 /s/ William E. McGlashan, Jr.
                                            ------------------------------------
                                                   WILLIAM E. MCGLASHAN, JR.
                                            CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHAIRMAN

A signed original of this written statement required by 18 U.S.C.Section 1350
has been provided to Critical Path, Inc. and will be retained by Critical Path,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.


------------------
(1)  The material contained in this Exhibit 99.1 is not deemed "filed" with the
     SEC and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the
     Company under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of
     1934, whether made before or after the date hereof and irrespective of any
     general incorporation language contained in such filing.
§ 162.311 How long may the term of a residential lease run? ( a ) A residential lease must provide for a definite lease term, state if there is an option to renew, and if so, provide for a definite term for the renewal period. ( 1 ) The maximum term of a lease approved under 25 U.S.C. 4211 may not exceed 50 years or may be month-to-month. The lease may provide for an initial term of less than 50 years with a provision for one or more renewals, so long as the maximum term, including all renewals, does not exceed 50 years.
( 2 ) The maximum term of a lease approved under 25 U.S.C. 415(a) may not exceed 50 years (consisting of an initial term not to exceed 25 years and one renewal not to exceed 25 years), unless a Federal statute provides for a longer maximum term (e.g., 25 U.S.C. 415(a) allows for a maximum term of 99 years for certain tribes), a different initial term, renewal term, or number of renewals.
( b ) For tribal land, we will defer to the tribe's determination that the lease term, including any renewal, is reasonable. For individually owned Indian land, we will review the lease term, including any renewal, to ensure it is reasonable, given the: ( 1 ) Purpose of the lease;
( 2 ) Type of financing; and
( 3 ) Level of investment.
( c ) Unless the lease provides otherwise, a residential lease may not be extended by holdover.
Exhibit 32.1






CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Annual Report of Pazoo, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, David M. Cunic, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.






By:
/s/ David M. CunicChief Executive OfficerMarch 31, 2014







This certification is made solely for purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, subject to the knowledge standard contained therein, and not for any other purpose.
SERVED : JUN E23 , 201 1 U.S
. DEPARTMEN T O FTRANSPORTATIO N '•,':• ^';i-^i;.[(v|[^^-„ ,

OFFIC EO FHEARING S " ' ' '' ' ^^"''' ' ' ^ '-' ^ WASHINGTON , D C
. ,^^, , ^ , I N TH EMATTE RO F MAR Y WOOTE N FA A DOCKE T NO
. CP09EA001 0 (Civi l Penalt y Action ) FDM S NO
. FAA-2009-007 7
NOTIC EO FHEARIN G Notic e i s hereb y give n tha t ahearin g i n th e above-entitle dmatte r wil l b e hel d beginnin g Augus t

4 , 2011 , at

1 0 a.m. , Easter n Time , a t th e Departmen t

o f Transportation , Hearin g Roo mE12-300 , 120 0 New Jerse y Avenue , S.E. , Washington , D C 20590
. Eac hpart y shal l serv e o n th e othe r part y an ddelive r

t o th e Judg e b y Jul y 28 , 2011 , tw o copie s o f

eac hexhibit

t o b e offere dat

th e hearin g (consecutivel y numbered , an dseparatel y tabbe dan dpaginated) , an dalis t o f witnesses , togethe r

withasummary o f thei r propose dtestimony
. I n addition , eac hpart y shoul dbrin g an origina l an dtw o copie s o f eac hpropose dexhibit

(consecutivel y numbered , an dseparatel y tabbe dan dpaginated ) for presentatio n a

t th e hearing
. If

Responden t

intend s t o rais e th e issu e o f ability t o pa y a civi l penalty , Responden t shal l file b y Jul y 21 , 2011 , informatio n an dabrie f concernin g th e availability o f

Respondent' s livin g trus t for paymen t o f an y penalty , an dComplainan t shal l file an y respons e b y Jul y 28 , 2011
. Partie s shoul dallo w sufficien t tim e t o pas s throug hsecurity an dshoul dnot e tha t recordin g equipmen t

an dcamera s ar e no t

permitte di n th e hearin g room . S O ORDERED
.

Rormi e A
. Yo j Chie f Administrati v Attachmen t

- Servic e Lis t

i ._ _FA A Docke t No
. CP09EA0010 (Civi l Penalt y Action ) SERVIC ELIS T ORIGINA L& ON ECOP Y Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n 80 0 Independenc e Avenue , S.W
. Washington , D C 2059 1 Attention : Hearin g Docke t Clerk , AGC-43 0 Wilbu r Wrigh t Building

- Suit e 2W1000 ' ON ECOP Y Robert H
. Waldman , Respondent' s Counse l 11 3 RidgleyAve
. Annapolis , M D 2140 1 TEL : 410-268-505 0 FAX : 410-269-154 4 Mary Wooten , Responden t 385 1 Ol dSolomon s Islan dRoa d Harwood , M D 2077 6 Christia n L
. Lewerenz , Complainant' s Counsel

Attorney , Offic e o f

th e Regiona l Counsel , EAL- 7 Eastern Regio n Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n 1 Aviatio n Plaz a Jamaica , N Y 1143 4 TEL : 718-553-327 3 FAX : 718-995-569 9 Th e Honorabl e Ronnie A
. Yoder , Chie f Administrativ e La w Judg e U.S
. Departmen t

o f Transportatio n Offic e o f Hearings , M-20 , Roo mE l 2-32 0 120 0 New Jerse y Avenue , S.E
. Washington , D C 2059 0 TEL : 202-366-214 2 FAX : 202-366-753 6 

# i

Service wa s b y U.S
. Mail
. For

servic e in perso n or

b y expeditedcourier , us e the followin g address : Federa l Aviation Administration , 60 0 Independenc e Avenue , S.W. , Wilbu r Wrigh t Building - Suit

e 2W1000 , Washington , D

C 20591 ; Attention : Hearing Docke t Clerk , AGC-430
. •I

-

- 2

-
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 945

To deny to aliens the opportunity to apply for asylum in Guam.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 2, 1999

Mr. UNDERWOOD introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To deny to aliens the opportunity to apply for asylum in

Guam.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. INABILITY OF ALIENS LANDING IN GUAM TO

4 APPLY THERE FOR ASYLUM.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding sections 208 and

6 235(b) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C.

7 1158 and 1225(b)), or any other provision of law, no alien

8 (as defined in section 101(a) of such Act (8 U.S.C.

9 1101(a)) may apply for asylum in Guam, and no claim

10 for asylum may be pursued through an interview or other

11 proceeding taking place in Guam. The preceding sentence
2

•HR 945 IH

1 applies irrespective of an alien’s status and whether the

2 alien is physically present in Guam or arrives in Guam

3 (whether or not at a designated port of arrival), and in4 cludes an alien who is brought to Guam after having been

5 interdicted in international or United States waters.

6 (b) DETENTION OF ALIENS PENDING TRANSPORT TO

7 ANOTHER PORT OF ENTRY.—

8 (1) IN GENERAL.—In the case of an alien de9 scribed in paragraph (2), the alien shall be arrested

10 and detained on a warrant issued by the Attorney

11 General pending transport by the Attorney General

12 from Guam to another place designated by the At13 torney General for purposes of further processing

14 under the Immigration and Nationality Act. Such

15 transport shall occur not later than 30 days after

16 the date on which the alien is deemed to be an appli17 cant for admission. Notwithstanding section 236(a)

18 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C.

19 1226(a)), the Attorney General may not release the

20 alien pending such transport.

21 (2) ALIENS DESCRIBED.—An alien described in

22 this paragraph is an alien who—

23 (A) is present or arriving in Guam;

24 (B) is seeking admission to the United

25 States; and
3

•HR 945 IH

1 (C) otherwise satisfies the requirements for

2 referral for an interview with an asylum officer

3 pursuant to section 235(b)(1)(B) of the Immi4 gration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C.

5 1225(b)(1)(B)) or is otherwise authorized, and

6 seeking, to establish eligibility for asylum under

7 section 208 of such Act.

8 (c) REIMBURSEMENT OF LOCAL COSTS.—The Attor9 ney General shall enter into a contractual arrangement

10 with the Government of Guam which provides for full and

11 complete compensation to Guam for any expense incurred

12 by Guam with respect to the detention of any alien pursu13 ant to this Act.

Æ
#### Emmons County *vs.*Luther A. Couch, *et al.*

Opinion filed November 13, 1900.

(84 N. W. Rep. 1117.)

Appeal from District Court, Emmons County; *Winchester,*J.

*George M. Register*and *Cochrane & Corliss,*for appellant.

*F. H. Register*and *H. A. Armstrong,*for respondents.

Per Curiam.

The controlling questions in this case were involved and decided in the case of *Emmons Co.*v. *Thompson*(decided this term) 9 N. D. 598, 84 N. W. Rep. 385. The order appealed from is in all things reversed, and the District Court is directed to enter an order reversing the same, and also to enter an order denying the application made herein to vacate said judgment and tax sale, with costs of both courts to appellant.