alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# **EXHIBIT 31.1**

 

## **CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Jeffrey L. Zelms,President & Chief Executive Officer, certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed thisquarterly report on Form 10-Q of The Doe Run Resources Corporation;

 

2. Based on my knowledge,this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit tostate a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the periods covered by this report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge,the financial statements, and other financial information included in thisreport, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, theperiods presented in this report;

 

4. The registrant’s othercertifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

(a)          Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b)         Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of theend of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

(c)          Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarterin the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and

 

5. The registrant’s othercertifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation ofinternal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performingthe equivalent functions):

 

(a)          Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

 

(b)         Any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

 

Date: September 14,2005

 

 
| By: | /s/ Jeffrey L. Zelms |   |
|-----|----------------------|--------|

Jeffrey L. Zelms

President & ChiefExecutive Officer

 

----
EXHIBIT 32.2

Statement of Chief Financial Officer under 18 U.S.C. § 1350

I, James A Clark, the chief financial officer of
Critical Path, Inc. (the Company), certify for the purposes of section 1350 of chapter 63 of title 18 of the United States Code that, to the best of my knowledge,



| | (i) | the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2006 (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | ---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                  
|------------------
|/s/ James A. Clark
|James A. Clark    

May 16, 2006

A signed original of this written statement required by 18 U.S.C. § 1350 has been provided to Critical Path, Inc. and will be retained by Critical Path, Inc. and furnished to the Securities Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.
February 11 , 2016

U.S. Department of Transportation Docket Management System 1200 New Jersey Ave, SE Washington, DC 20590

Re: Request to Amend Section 333 Exemption No. 14485 , dated January 14, 2016

, Docket No. FAA

- 2015

- 5026

Dear Sir or Madam:

Westar Energy, Inc. ("Westar Energy") petitions to amend its small Unmanned Aerial Systems (sUAS) Section 333 Exemption (No. 14485 ) . The request to amend is for two purposes. The first is to allow Westar Energy to operate two additional types of sUAS under the exemption. The second is to correct a typographical error in the applicant’s name contained in No. 14485.

1. Westar Energy requests amendment of No. 14485 to include the following sUAS, Ve rtical Takeoff and Landing (VTOL) rotorcraft in addition to the UAS already listed in paragraph
1 of the No 14485 conditions :

• Turbo Ace Matrix E

- Series Rotorcraft/ Q uadcopter , previously approved in, but not limited to the following exemptions : Exemption No. 11875, 12646A, 14502

. It has a maximum takeoff weight of 12.5 pounds. It is equipped with failsafe features that will automatically return the aircraft to home if connection with controller is lost.

• T he DJI Inspire 1 Pro Rotorcraft/ Q uadcopter , previously approved in, but not limited to the following exemptions : 12394, 11461, 12938. It has a maximum takeoff weight of 7.72 pounds. It is equipped with failsafe features that will automatically return the
aircraft to home if connection with controller is lost.

The above listed aircraft will be operated under the same terms and conditions set forth in the approved exemption. All operations of listed aircraft will be in full compliance with the terms of the exemption.

2. Westar Energy also request s amendment of No. 14485 to correct the spelling of the applicant’s name. Exemption No

. 14485 contains the typographical error “Westar Engergy.” This should be corrected so the exemption accurately states the name of the applicant as provided in the original petition and this petiti on for amendment.February 11, 2016 Page 2

The name and address of the applicant are: Westar Energy, Inc.

818 S. Kansas Avenue

PO Box 889 Topeka, KS 66601
Attn: Jason Klenklen
Ph one : 785

- 575

- 8187 Email: Jason.klenklen@westarenergy.com

Best r egards,

/S/ Jason Klenklen

Jason Klenklen Supervisor, Transmission Maintenance
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Readout of the U.S.-Singapore Mid-Term Defense Review

U.S. Department of Defense

Department of Defense spokesperson Lt. Col. Martin Meiners provided the following readout:

Assistant Secretary of Defense Ely Ratner hosted Singapore Ministry of Defence Deputy Secretary for Policy Frederick Choo at the Pentagon today for the 9th U.S.-Singapore Mid-Term Defense Review.

Both officials reaffirmed the progress the United States and Singapore have made to deepen their longstanding partnership on defense cooperation.

They reviewed ongoing bilateral defense initiatives – including force posture cooperation and high-end air-to-air training – and agreed to continue strengthening U.S.-Singapore collaboration on a range of efforts, including maritime domain awareness and emerging technologies.

The two officials also reiterated that the partnership between the United States and Singapore is built on common principles, underscoring their mutual commitment to supporting the security, stability, and prosperity of a free and open Indo-Pacific region.

While at the Pentagon, Deputy Secretary Choo also met with Acting Under Secretary of Defense for Policy Sasha Baker to discuss the close defense cooperation between both countries.

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C.  SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of General Metals Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended July 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Stephen Parent, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1)

the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)

the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Dated: December 10, 2009.



|                                                                                  
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Stephen Parent                                                                
|Stephen Parent
President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
|
#### § 162.599 What happens if the lessee abandons the leased premises?

If a lessee abandons the leased premises, we will treat the abandonment as a violation of the lease. The lease may specify a period of non-use after which the lease premises will be considered abandoned.
#### In the Matter of Proving the Last Will and Testament of Thomas Brighton, Deceased. Mary A. Jeffery, Appellant; Kate Brighton, Respondent.

Decree *915of Surrogate’s Court reversed, with costs to the appellant to abide the event, payable out of the estate, and the following question of fact is hereby ordered to be tried by a jury at a Trial Term of the Supreme .Court to be held in and for the county of Niagara, commencing on the 6th day of April, 1908, viz.: Was the alleged testator competent to make a last will and testament at the time the will proposed for probate was alleged to have been executed ? All concurred, except Williams, J., who dissented.
#### § 115.606 What happens if you do not request a hearing to challenge BIA's decision to restrict your IIM account during the allotted time period?

If you or your guardian, as applicable, do not request a hearing to challenge BIA's decision to restrict your IIM account during the allotted time period, BIA's decision to restrict your IIM account will become final. BIA will follow the procedures outlined in § 115.616 through § 115.618, and § 115.620, as applicable.
`[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 138 Reported in House (RH)]






                                                  House Calendar No. 36
106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 138

                          [Report No. 106-93]

 Providing for the consideration of the bill (H.R. 472) to amend title 
 13, United States Code, to require the use of postcensus local review 
                   as part of each decennial census.


_______________________________________________________________________


                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 13, 1999

   Mr. Sessions, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION


 
 Providing for the consideration of the bill (H.R. 472) to amend title 
 13, United States Code, to require the use of postcensus local review 
                   as part of each decennial census.

    Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it shall be in 
order to consider in the House the bill (H.R. 472) to amend title 13, 
United States Code, to require the use of postcensus local review as 
part of each decennial census. The bill shall be considered as read for 
amendment. The amendment printed in the report of the Committee on 
Rules accompanying this resolution shall be considered as adopted. The 
previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill, as 
amended, and on any further amendment thereto to final passage without 
intervening motion except: (1) one hour of debate on the bill, as 
amended, equally divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking 
minority member of the Committee on Government Reform; (2) a further 
amendment printed in the Congressional Record and numbered 1 pursuant 
to clause 8 of rule XVIII, if offered by Representative Maloney of New 
York or her designee, which shall be considered as read and shall be 
separately debatable for one hour equally divided and controlled by the 
proponent and an opponent; and (3) one motion to recommit with or 
without instructions.
                                     





                                                  House Calendar No. 36

106th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                              H. RES. 138

                          [Report No. 106-93]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 Providing for the consideration of the bill (H.R. 472) to amend title 
 13, United States Code, to require the use of postcensus local review 
                   as part of each decennial census.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             April 13, 1999

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed`
### §12215. Commissioned officers: reserve grade of adjutants general and assistant adjutants general

(a) The adjutant general or an assistant adjutant general of the Army National Guard of a State may, upon being extended Federal recognition, be appointed as a reserve officer of the Army as of the date on which he is so recognized.

(b) The adjutant general or an assistant adjutant general of the Air National Guard of a State may be appointed in the reserve commissioned grade in which Federal recognition in the Air National Guard is extended to him.

(Added Pub. L. 103–337, div. A, title XVI, §1662(c)(1), Oct. 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 2990.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

Provisions similar to those in this section were contained in sections 3392 and 8392 of this title, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 103–337, §1629(a)(1), (c)(1).

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Dec. 1, 1994, except as otherwise provided, see section 1691 of Pub. L. 103–337, set out as a note under section 10001 of this title.
#### § 150.204 Who records title documents?

The LTRO is the designated office to record title documents. The BIA Director may delegate the authority to record title documents to another BIA office by documenting the delegation and the types of transactions to which it applies in the Indian Affairs Manual.
### §10148. Ready Reserve: failure to satisfactorily perform prescribed training

(a) A member of the Ready Reserve covered by section 10147 of this title who fails in any year to perform satisfactorily the training duty prescribed in that section, as determined by the Secretary concerned under regulations prescribed by the Secretary of Defense, may be ordered without his consent to perform additional active duty for training for not more than 45 days. If the failure occurs during the last year of his required membership in the Ready Reserve, his membership is extended until he performs that additional active duty for training, but not for more than six months.

(b) A member of the Army National Guard of the United States or the Air National Guard of the United States who fails in any year to perform satisfactorily the training duty prescribed by or under law for members of the Army National Guard or the Air National Guard, as the case may be, as determined by the Secretary concerned, may, upon the request of the Governor of the State (or, in the case of the District of Columbia, the commanding general of the District of Columbia National Guard) be ordered, without his consent, to perform additional active duty for training for not more than 45 days. A member ordered to active duty under this subsection shall be ordered to duty as a Reserve of the Army or as a Reserve of the Air Force, as the case may be.

(Added Pub. L. 103–337, div. A, title XVI, §1661(a)(1), Oct. 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 2974.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

Provisions similar to those in this section were contained in section 270(b), (c) of this title, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 103–337, §1661(a)(2)(A).

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Dec. 1, 1994, except as otherwise provided, see section 1691 of Pub. L. 103–337, set out as a note under section 10001 of this title.

Pub. L. 103–337, div. A, title XVI, §1661(a)(5)(B), Oct. 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 2980, provided that: "Section 10148(b) [10 U.S.C. 10148(b)], as added by paragraph (1), applies only to persons who became members of the Army National Guard of the United States or the Air National Guard of the United States after October 4, 1961."
H. Res. 186

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

May 26, 1999.

Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it

shall be in order to consider in the House the bill (H.R.

1259) to amend the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 to

protect Social Security surpluses through strengthened budgetary enforcement mechanisms. The bill shall be considered

as read for amendment. The amendment specified in section

2 of this resolution shall be considered as adopted. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill, as

amended, to final passage without intervening motion except:

(1) two hours of debate equally divided and controlled among

the chairmen and ranking minority members of the Committees on the Budget, Rules, and Ways and Means; and (2) one

motion to recommit with or without instructions.
2

•HRES 186 EH

SEC. 2. The amendment considered as adopted is as follows: page 3, line 13, strike ‘‘cause or increase’’ and insert

‘‘set forth’’.

Attest:

Clerk.
#### § 101.8 Office of the United States Trade Representative.

Freedom of Information regulations for the Office of the United States Trade Representative appear at 15 CFR part 2004.

[55 FR 46037, Nov. 1, 1990]
§ 162.238 What indemnities are required under an agricultural lease? ( a ) An agricultural lease must require that the tenant indemnify and hold the United States and the Indian landowners harmless from any loss, liability, or damages resulting from the tenant's use or occupation of the leased premises, unless: ( 1 ) The tenant would be prohibited by law from making such an agreement; or
( 2 ) The interests of the Indian landowners are adequately protected by insurance.
( b ) Unless the tenant would be prohibited by law from making such an agreement, an agricultural lease must specifically require that the tenant indemnify the United States and the Indian landowners against all liabilities or costs relating to the use, handling, treatment, removal, storage, transportation, or disposal of hazardous materials, or the release or discharge of any hazardous materials from the leased premises that occurs during the lease term, regardless of fault.
#### STEIN’S STORES, Inc., and Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America, Petitioners, v. Honorable Robert L. TAYLOR, Judge of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee, Northern Division, Respondent.

No. 12357.

United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit.

Oct. 25, 1954.

Paxton & Seasongood, Cincinnati, Ohio, Albert Williams, Nashville, Tenn., Cleary, Gottlieb, Friendly & Hamilton, New York City, Williams, Harwell, Howser & Thomas, Nashville, Tenn., for petitioners.

No attorney for respondent.

Before SIMONS, Chief Judge, and McALLISTER and STEWART, Circuit .Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the petitioners’ motion for leave to file their petition for a writ of mandamus and of the said petition and the exhibits appended thereto and the statement in support thereof;

And it appearing that in remanding the cause entitled “Hall-Tate .Manufacturing Company v. Stein’s Stores, Inc., and Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America” to the Chancery Court of the State of Tennessee, at Knoxville, Knox 'County, Tennessee, the said district judge found that the said Chancery Court had previously acquired jurisdiction in rem and concluded as a matter of law that it was therefore not necessary to determine whether the requisite diversity of citi2;enship between the parties existed;

And it further appearing that a writ of mandamus is not available to review the legal conclusions of a district court in remanding a cause to a state court. 28 U.S.C. § 1447(d); Kloeb v. Armour & Co., 311 U.S. 199, 61 S.Ct. 213, 85 L.Ed. 124;

The petitioners’ motion for leave to file their petition for mandamus is denied.