alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 212.

#### The State of Louisiana vs. Boyd Scott.

Although a *pocket knife*be not *qo nomine*a dangerous weapon within sec. 932 of R. S., it may, *by its*use, be considered such, under sec. 794 R. S., which provides punishment for the infliction, with a dangerous weapon, of a wound less than mayhem.

A count, charging that the accused “with a certain dangerous weapon, commonly called a *■pocket*knife, did feloniously inflict a severe wound less than mayhem on the body of,” when proved, justifies a verdi t of guilty,

The ruling in 38 Ann. 942 has no bearing here.

APPEAL from the Eleventh District Court, Parish of Natchitoches. *Pierson,*J.

*D. G. Scarborough,*District Attorney, for the State, Appellee.

*Jaelc & THsnmlces*for Defendant and Appellant.

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Bermudez, C. J.

The indictment contains two counts : On the first the accused was acquitted, but on the second he was convicted.

The prosecution is based on section 794 of the Revised Statutes.

The second count is that the defendant, with a certain dangerous weapon commonly called a *pocket Jmi/e,*did feloniously inflict a severe wound less than mayhem on the body of -, etc.

The motion in arrest made by the accused, charges that the indictment is fatally defective, because a pocket knife is *not*a dangerous weapon and because it does not charge *“with intent to Mil.”*

The Statute provides ( sec. 794 R. S.) that, *“*whoever shall, with a dangerous weapon, or with intent to kill, inflict a wound less than mayhem upon another person, shall, upon conviction,” etc.

It may well be that the accused could not, under sec. 932 R. S. have been convicted for carrying a dangerous weapon concealed on or about *944his person, because a pocket knife is not *eo nomine*a dangerous weapon; but it does not follow that when, under sec. 794 R. S., the charge is that tlie accused did, with such a knife, feloniously inflict a severe wound less than mayhem,'such weayion may not be considered by the court and-jury as a dangerous weapon, by the use made of it, within the meaning of that section, particularly as the description of the weapon is not necessarily required by the statute, which merely mentions a *dangerous weapon,*i. e., any dangerous weapon which may be so by its use, or in- itself.

Under the count as made, evidence could well have been received and if deemed sufficient the jury could have convicted the accused for having with *a dangerous weapon*inflicted a wound less than mayhem, on the body of another person.

It is true that the count does not charge that the accused did, *with intent to hill,*inflict a wound less than mayhem, though it does, that he did inflict the wound *feloniously,*but this is of no moment in this case.

The charge was made in accord with the requirements of the statute and, if the evidence adduced justified the findings, the jury could legally return the verdict rendered.

The ruling in State vs. Nelson, 38 Ann. 942, affords defendant no relief.

Judgment affirmed.
```

[115th Congress Public Law 81]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

[[Page 131 STAT. 1264]]

Public Law 115-81
115th Congress

                                 An Act

 
 To designate the checkpoint of the United States Border Patrol located 
  on United States Highway 77 North in Sarita, Texas, as the ``Javier 
   Vega, Jr. Border Patrol Checkpoint''. <<NOTE: Nov. 2, 2017 -  [S. 
                                1617]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, <<NOTE: Javier Vega, Jr. 
Memorial Act of 2017.>> 
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Javier Vega, Jr. Memorial Act of 
2017''.
SEC. 2. FINDINGS.

    Congress finds the following:
            (1) A native of La Feria, Texas, Border Patrol Agent Javier 
        Vega, Jr., served his country first a member of the United 
        States Marines Corps and then proudly as a border patrol agent 
        in the canine division with his dog, Goldie.
            (2) Agent Vega was assigned to the Kingsville, Texas, Border 
        Patrol Station as a canine handler and worked primarily at the 
        Sarita Border Patrol Checkpoint.
            (3) On August 3, 2014, Agent Vega was on a fishing trip with 
        his family near Raymondville, Texas, when 2 criminal aliens 
        attempted to rob and attack them.
            (4) Agent Vega was shot and killed while attempting to 
        subdue the assailants and protecting his family.
            (5) Agent Vega is survived by his wife, parents, 3 sons, 
        brother, sister-in-law, niece, and dog, Goldie.
SEC. 3. DESIGNATION.

    The checkpoint of the United States Border Patrol located on United 
States Highway 77 North in Sarita, Texas, shall be known and designated 
as the ``Javier Vega, Jr. Border Patrol Checkpoint''.
SEC. 4. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the checkpoint described

[[Page 131 STAT. 1265]]

in section 3 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Javier Vega, Jr. 
Border Patrol Checkpoint''.

    Approved November 2, 2017.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--S. 1617:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 163 (2017):
            Aug. 3, considered and passed House.
            Oct. 10, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
#### Mark McDaniels v. The State.

No. 22708.

Delivered January 12, 1944.

*542The opinion states the case.

*Aubrey Davee,*of Brady, for appellant.

*Ernest S. Goens,*State’s Attorney, of Austin, for the State.

GRAVES, Judge.

Appellant was convicted by a jury of violation of the liquor laws of McCulloch County, and assessed a fine of $100.00.

There are no bills of exceptions in the record.

The facts substantiate the allegations in the complaint and information, with no attempt to deny or controvert the same.

The judgment is affirmed.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

# U.S. 7th Fleet and Armed Forces of the Philippines Begin Maritime Cooperation Activity

By Commander, U.S. 7th Fleet Public Affairs

                SOUTH CHINA SEA  –              
U.S.7th Fleet (C7F) and Armed Forces of the Philippine (AFP) units began a maritime cooperation activity (MCA) in the South China Sea, Nov. 22.  

The MCA is designed to enhance interoperability between the two militaries and further advance combined capabilities in the maritime domain.

C7F units participating in the MCA are the Independence-variant littoral combat ship USS Gabrielle Giffords (LCS 10), assigned to Destroyer Squadron 7, and a P-8A Poseidon maritime patrol and reconnaissance aircraft, assigned to the “Fighting Tigers” of Patrol Squadron (VP) 8. 

AFP units participating are two FA-50PH aircraft, an A-29B Super Tucano aircraft, and three Philippine Navy ships: BRP Conrado Yap, BRP Jose Rizal, and BRP Gregorio del Pilar.

U.S. 7th Fleet is the U.S. Navy's largest forward-deployed numbered fleet, and routinely interacts and operates with allies and partners in preserving a free and open Indo-Pacific region. 

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT
§ 603.13 Requests for access to Records. ( a ) An Individual seeking access to Records about himself/herself shall do so by appearing in person at NCPC's official place of business or by written correspondence to the NCPC Privacy Act Officer. In-person requests shall be by appointment only with the Privacy Act Officer on a Workday during regular office hours. For written requests sent via the U.S. mail, the Request shall be directed to the Privacy Act Officer at NCPC's official address listed at *www.ncpc.gov .* If sent via email or facsimile, the request shall be directed to the email address or facsimile number indicated on the NCPC Web site. To expedite internal handling of Privacy Act Requests, the words Privacy Act Request shall appear prominently on the envelop or the subject line of an email or facsimile cover sheet.
( b ) The Request shall: ( 1 ) State the Request is made pursuant to the Privacy Act;
( 2 ) Describe the requested Records in sufficient detail to enable their location including, without limitation, the dates the Records were compiled and the name or identifying number of each System of Record in which they are kept as identified in the list of NCPC's SORNs published on its Web site; and
( 3 ) State pursuant to the fee schedule in set forth in § 603.17 a willingness to pay all fees associated with the Privacy Act Request or the maximum fee the Requester is willing to pay.
( c ) The NCPC shall require identification as follows before releasing Records to an Individual: ( 1 ) An Individual Requesting Privacy Act Records in person shall present a valid, photographic form of identification such as a driver's license, employee identification card, or passport that renders it possible for the PAO to verify that the Individual is the same Individual as contained in the requested Records.
( 2 ) An Individual Requesting Privacy Act Records by mail shall state their full name, address and date of birth in their correspondence. The Request must be signed and the signature must either be notarized or submitted with a statement signed and dated as follows: I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing facts establishing my identification are true and correct.
( d ) The PAO shall determine within 20 Workdays whether to grant or deny an Individual's Request for Access to the requested Record(s) and notify the Individual in writing accordingly. The PAO's response shall state his/her determination and the reasons therefor. If the Request is denied because the Record(s) is/are under the jurisdiction of the OPM, the response shall advise the Requester to contact OPM. In the case of an Adverse Determination, the written notification shall advise the Individual of his/her right to appeal the Adverse Determination in accordance with the requirements of § 603.16.
Exhibit 32.2

                        GLOBAL EQUITY INTERNATIONAL, INC.
                              A Nevada Corporation
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In   connection   with  the  amended   Annual   Report  of  Global   Equity
International,  Inc.  ("Company")  on Form 10-K for the year ended  December 31,
2011, as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Enzo Taddei, Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Dated: May 29, 2012                        /s/ Enzo Taddei
                                           -------------------------------------
                                      By:  Enzo Taddei
                                      Its: Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Avalon Holdings Corporation on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Timothy C. Coxson, Chief Financial Officer of Avalon Holdings Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Avalon Holdings Corporation.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Timothy C. Coxson  
|Timothy C. Coxson      
|Chief Financial Officer
|November 10, 2006
IV

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 201

Recognizing the importance for families to pledge to each other to be organ

and tissue donors.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 8, 1999

Mr. BILBRAY (for himself and Mr. GREENWOOD) submitted the following

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Commerce

RESOLUTION

Recognizing the importance for families to pledge to each

other to be organ and tissue donors.

Whereas more than 20,000 Americans are given a new

chance at life each year through the medical miracle of

organ transplantation;

Whereas the number of Americans who could benefit from a

transplant is growing by more than 10 percent per year;

Whereas 63,000 men, women, and children are currently on

waiting lists for lifesaving organ transplants;

Whereas another man, woman, or child is added to a waiting

list every 16 minutes;

Whereas the number of Americans on waiting lists is expected to pass 100,000 early in the 21st century;
2

•HRES 201 IH

Whereas every two hours, one American on the waiting list

dies for lack of an available heart, lung, intestine, kidney,

pancreas, or liver;

Whereas fewer than one-third of the deaths that could result

in the gift of organs actually result in donation;

Whereas even when individuals have indicated a desire to be

a donor, those wishes often go unfulfilled;

Whereas checking the organ donation box on a driver’s license does not guarantee organ donation;

Whereas the final decision on whether to donate organs is always made by surviving family members;

Whereas the American Society of Transplant Surgeons is

urging Americans to discuss the miracle of transplantation as a family, and make a family commitment to

organ and tissue donation;

Whereas the likelihood of a family member needing to receive

an organ transplant is four times greater than the likelihood that circumstances ever will put a family member

in a position to be an organ donor;

Whereas a majority of the Members of both the House of

Representatives and the Senate, have demonstrated leadership by signing the First Family Pledge, a family commitment to support organ and tissue donation; and

Whereas organizations, such as the First Family Pledge and

Coalition on Donation, have demonstrated great leadership by raising the awareness and the importance of

organ donations through events such as the First Family

Pledge Congress on Organ Tissue Donation held in

Washington, D.C., on April 14, 1999: Now, therefore, be

it
3

•HRES 201 IH

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives—

2 (1) recognizes the importance of families pledg3 ing to each other to share their lives as organ and

4 tissue donors; and

5 (2) acknowledges the importance of discussing

6 organ and tissue donation as a family.

Æ
#### § 1000.214 Will the bureau and the Tribe/Consortium share information concerning inquiries about the Tribes/Consortia and the AFA?

Yes, the bureau and the Tribe/Consortium will exchange information about inquiries from affected or interested parties relating to the AFA under negotiation.
Order filed December 22, 2016 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-16-00153-CR

____________

BRENT JUSTICE, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 176th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1385768

O R D E R

The clerk’s record was filed June 15, 2016. Our review has determined that a 

relevant item has been omitted from the clerk's record. See Tex. R. App. P. 34.5(c). 

The record does not contain the indictment.

The Harris County District Clerk is directed to file a supplemental clerk’s 

record on or before January 6, 2017, containing the indictment.
If the omitted item is not part of the case file, the district clerk is directed to 

file a supplemental clerk’s record containing a certified statement that the omitted 

item is not a part of the case file.

PER CURIAM
131 STAT. 1158 PUBLIC LAW 115–61—SEPT. 27, 2017 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 3110: 

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 115–293 (Comm. on Financial Services). 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 163 (2017): 

Sept. 5, considered and passed House. 

Sept. 19, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

Public Law 115–61 

115th Congress 

An Act 

To amend the Financial Stability Act of 2010 to modify the term of the independent 

member of the Financial Stability Oversight Council. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Financial Stability Oversight 

Council Insurance Member Continuity Act’’. 

SEC. 2. FINANCIAL STABILITY OVERSIGHT COUNCIL. 

Section 111(c) of the Financial Stability Act of 2010 (12 U.S.C. 

5321(c)) is amended by adding at the end the following: 

‘‘(4) TERM OF INDEPENDENT MEMBER.—Notwithstanding 

paragraph (1), if a successor to the independent member of 

the Council serving under subsection (b)(1)(J) is not appointed 

and confirmed by the end of the term of service of such member, 

such member may continue to serve until the earlier of— 

‘‘(A) 18 months after the date on which the term of 

service ends; or 

‘‘(B) the date on which a successor to such member 

is appointed and confirmed.’’. 

Approved September 27, 2017. 

Financial 

Stability 

Oversight 

Council 

Insurance 

Member 

Continuity Act. 

12 USC 5301 

note. 

Sept. 27, 2017 

[H.R. 3110] 


dkrause on DSKBC28HB2PROD with PUBLAWS
From: Castronovo.Alison

To: Jordan, Ronald

Cc: Thomas Finseth ; Flanders, Phillip

Subject: RE: EPA questions for upcoming call with We Energies (P4 data)

Date: Monday, June 16, 2014 10:09:32 AM

Ron,

The Pleasant Prairie combined discharge to Lake Michigan via Outfall 001 consists of cooling tower

blowdown, treated FGD wastewater, and effluent from another wastewater treatment system

onsite which processes low volume wastewater, coal pile runoff, and non-chemical metal cleaning

wastewater. When the warming line is in service, a portion of the effluent regularly routed to

Outfall 001 is directed to Outfall 002 (deicing line) immediately adjacent to the intake. While the

FGD effluent has the potential to be included in this combined effluent, it is not discharged when

the warming line is in service because the FGD wastewater routed back to the plant impacts cooling

tower chemistry and can lead to elevated levels of Total Residual Chlorine (TRC). Thus, during cold

periods in the winter months, when the warming line is in service, the FGD wastewater treatment

system is placed in recirculation mode (effluent is recirculated to the absorber or to the equalization

tank), which causes the mercury levels to rise due to the buildup of fine, colloidal particles that are

difficult to remove.

Alison

From: Jordan, Ronald [mailto:Jordan.Ronald@epa.gov]

Sent: Monday, June 16, 2014 6:34 AM

To: Castronovo.Alison

Cc: Thomas Finseth; Flanders, Phillip

Subject: RE: EPA questions for upcoming call with We Energies (P4 data)

Good morning Allison,

Thanks for sending the responses to our questions. Regarding #23, What is the “combined effluent”

that is sent to the warming line and is FGD wastewater included in this?

Ron

From: Castronovo.Alison [ mailto:Alison.Castronovo@we-energies.com ]

Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2014 2:32 PM

To: Jordan, Ronald

Subject: RE: EPA questions for upcoming call with We Energies (P4 data)

Ron,

Attached is the written response from We Energies relaying the answers to EPA’s questions about

P4 data.If you have any other questions or require further clarification, please do not hesitate to contact

Dave Lee or me.



### Alison Castronovo

Environmental Engineer

We Energies

333 W. Everett Street, A231

Milwaukee, WI 53203

Office: (414) 221-4337

From: Jordan, Ronald [ mailto:Jordan.Ronald@epa.gov ]

Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2014 11:36 AM

To: Lee.David; Thomas Finseth; Dan-Tam Nguyen; Yan Zhuang; Schroeder, Cuc; Flanders, Phillip

Subject: EPA questions for upcoming call with We Energies (P4 data)
### **CHAPTER 172—STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM**

Sec.
2901.
Strategic Environmental Research and Development Program.
2902.
Strategic Environmental Research and Development Program Council.
2903.
Executive Director.
2904.
Strategic Environmental Research and Development Program Scientific Advisory Board.