alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE

WASHINGTON : 

1 

79–011 2017

115th Congress, 1st Session – – – – – – – – – – – – – House Document 115–77 

CONTINUATION OF THE NATIONAL EMERGENCY 

WITH RESPECT TO IRAN 

MESSAGE 

FROM

THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES 

TRANSMITTING

NOTIFICATION THAT THE NATIONAL EMERGENCY WITH RESPECT 

TO IRAN, DECLARED IN EXECUTIVE ORDER 12170 OF NOVEMBER 

14, 1979, IS TO CONTINUE IN EFFECT BEYOND NOVEMBER 14, 

2017, PURSUANT TO 50 U.S.C. 1622(d); PUBLIC LAW 94–412, SEC. 

202(d); (90 STAT. 1257) 

NOVEMBER 6, 2017.—Message and accompanying papers referred to the 

Committee on Foreign Affairs and ordered to be printed 


E:\Seals\Congress.#13
(1) 

To the Congress of the United States: 

Section 202(d) of the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 

1622(d)) provides for the automatic termination of a national emergency unless, within 90 days before the anniversary date of its declaration, the President publishes in the Federal Register and transmits to the Congress a notice stating that the emergency is to continue in effect beyond the anniversary date. In accordance with this 

provision, I have sent to the Federal Register for publication the enclosed notice stating that the national emergency with respect to 

Iran that was declared in Executive Order 12170 of November 14, 

1979, is to continue in effect beyond November 14, 2017. 

Our relations with Iran have not yet normalized, and the process 

of implementing the agreements with Iran, dated January 19, 

1981, is ongoing. For this reason, I have determined that it is necessary to continue the national emergency declared in Executive 

Order 12170 with respect to Iran. 

DONALD J. TRUMP. 

THE WHITE HOUSE, November 6, 2017. 

(3) 

NOTICE

CONTINUATION OF THE NATIONAL EMERGENCY WITH RESPECT TO

IRAN

On November 14, 1979, in Executive Order 12170, the President 

declared a national emergency with respect to Iran pursuant to the 

International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701– 

1706) to deal with the unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security, foreign policy, and economy of the United States. 

Our relations with Iran have not yet normalized, and the process 

of implementing the agreements with Iran, dated January 19, 

1981, is ongoing. For this reason, the national emergency declared 

on November 14, 1979, and the measures adopted on that date to 

deal with that emergency, must continue in effect beyond November 14, 2017. In accordance with section 202(d) of the National 

Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1622(d)), I am continuing for 1 year the 

national emergency with respect to Iran declared in Executive 

Order 12170. 

The emergency declared in Executive Order 12170 is distinct 

from the emergency declared in Executive Order 12957 on March 

15, 1995. This renewal, therefore, is distinct from the emergency 

renewal of January 13, 2017. 

This notice shall be published in the Federal Register and transmitted to the Congress. 

DONALD J. TRUMP. 

THE WHITE HOUSE, November 6, 2017. 

Æ
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

**JTF - Micronesia Menu**

                        - JTF-M Leadership
                        - JTF-M Press Room                            - News
                          - Stories
                          More
                        - JTF-M Documents
                        - JTF-M Contact Us

# Department of Defense participating in Singapore Airshow 2024

By Pacific Air Forces Public Affairs

                JOINT BASE PEARL HARBOR-HICKAM, Hawaii   –              
The U.S. Department of Defense will participate in the Singapore Airshow 2024 with aerial demonstrations and static displays at Changi Exhibition Center, Republic of Singapore, Feb. 20-25.

SA2024 is one of the largest defense exhibitions and tradeshows in the Pacific and this year it continues with over 1,000 exhibitors expected to participate. Some of the DoD aircraft and equipment scheduled to participate in this year’s event are the F-35A, MQ-9, and P-8 among others.

The DoD is excited for the opportunity to build upon already strong ties with Singapore, showcase equipment and aircraft systems, enable engagement with foreign partners, and further power projection capabilities.

For more information about the airshow click here.

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

SA2024

Singapore Air Show

PACAF
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

        STATEMENT OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER UNDER 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

     I, Paul H. Bartlett, the chief financial officer of Critical Path, Inc.
(the "Company"), certify for the purposes of section 1350 of chapter 63 of title
18 of the United States Code that, to my knowledge,:

     (i) the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the quarterly
period ended September 30, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

     (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Date: November 12, 2003                  /s/ Paul H. Bartlett
                           -----------------------------------------------------
                                             Paul H. Bartlett
                           Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
has been provided to Critical Path, Inc. and will be retained by Critical Path,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.

------------------
(1) The material contained in this Exhibit 32.2 is not deemed "filed" with the
SEC and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company
under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, whether
made before or after the date hereof and irrespective of any general
incorporation language contained in such filing.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# 7th Fleet Destroyer Transits Taiwan Strait

U.S. Navy

U.S. 7th Fleet Public Affairs -- Arleigh Burke-class guided-missile destroyer USS Chung-Hoon (DDG 93) and Royal Canadian Navy Halifax-class frigate HMCS Montreal (FFH 336) are conducting a routine Taiwan Strait transit June 3 (local time) through waters where high-seas freedoms of navigation and overflight apply in accordance with international law. The ships transit through a corridor in the Strait that is beyond the territorial sea of any coastal State. Chung-Hoon and Montreal's bilateral transit through the Taiwan Strait demonstrates the commitment of the United States and our allies and partners to a free and open Indo-Pacific. Cooperation like this represents the centerpiece of our approach to a secure and prosperous region where aircraft and ships of all nations may fly, sail and operate anywhere international law allows.

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More
|                                |
|--------------------------------|
|                                |  |
| Media Contact                  | September 24, 2014 |
| Casey Lassiter, 205-410-2777   | For Immediate Release |
| casey.lassiter@healthsouth.com |   |
|                           |   |
| Investor Relations Contact     |   |
| Mary Ann Arico, 205-969-6175   |   |
| maryann.arico@healthsouth.com  |   |

----
AFS-12-337-E 

June 21, 2012 

 

 Exemption No. 10177C 

 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2010-0970 

Mr. Omer ErSelcuk 

President/Chief Executive Officer 

Seaborne Virgin Islands, Inc., d.b.a. Seaborne Airlines 

1210 Watergut Street 

Christianstead, VI 00820 

Dear Mr. ErSelcuk: 

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your petition to extend Exemption 

No. 10177, as amended. It explains the basis for our decision and describes its effect. 

The Basis for Our Decision 

By letter dated April 19, 2012, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on 

behalf of Seaborne Virgin Islands, Inc., d.b.a. Seaborne Airlines (Seaborne Airlines) for an 

extension of Exemption No. 10177, as amended, to June 30, 2013. That exemption from 

part 121, appendix K, paragraph 5a of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations allows Seaborne 

Airlines to continue to operate DHC-6-300 float-equipped airplanes after the December 20, 

2010, effective date without meeting certain aircraft performance requirements. 

In your petition, you indicate that there has been no change in the conditions and reasons 

relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original exemption. 

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition 

in the Federal Register because the requested extension of the exemption would not set a 

precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to Seaborne Airlines. 
 2

Our Decision 

The FAA has determined that the justification for the issuance of Exemption No. 10177, as 

amended, remains valid with respect to this exemption and is in the public interest. 

Therefore, under the authority provided by 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA 

Administrator has delegated to me, I grant your petition. 

The Effect of Our Decision 

Our decision extends the termination date of Exemption No. 10177, as amended, to June 30, 

2013, unless sooner superseded or rescinded. 

Sincerely, 

/S/ 

John S. Duncan 

Deputy Director, Flight Standards 

 Service
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> BD
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL
CONDITION IN THE COMPANY'S QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTERLY
PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 2000. AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                         383,703
<RECEIVABLES>                                  317,772
<SECURITIES-RESALE>                                  0
<SECURITIES-BORROWED>                                0
<INSTRUMENTS-OWNED>                          1,428,211
<PP&E>                                          50,201
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,311,578
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<PAYABLES>                                     251,008
<REPOS-SOLD>                                         0
<SECURITIES-LOANED>                                  0
<INSTRUMENTS-SOLD>                           1,354,477
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,223
<OTHER-SE>                                     704,870
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,311,578
<TRADING-REVENUE>                              770,086
<INTEREST-DIVIDENDS>                            22,495
<COMMISSIONS>                                   10,177
<INVESTMENT-BANKING-REVENUES>                        0
<FEE-REVENUE>                                   20,329
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              14,864
<COMPENSATION>                                 277,416
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                325,855
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     325,855
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   203,751
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.67
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.60


</TABLE>
Motion Granted; Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed January 

17, 2019.

In The 

Fourteenth Court of Appeals 

NO. 14-18-01094-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF R.J.N.W. 

On Appeal from the 309th District Court 

Harris County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. 2018-17595 

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N 

This is an appeal from an order signed December 12, 2018. On January 4, 

2019, appellant, B.O., filed a motion to dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1. 

The motion is granted, and the appeal is ordered dismissed. 

PER CURIAM 

Panel consists of Justices Wise, Zimmerer, and Spain.
#### Solomon J. Smith v. John McEvoy.

1. *Leases*— Evidence *Tending to Vary the Terms of,*Inadmissible.— In a suit between a landlord and his tenant, evidence which tends to vary the terms of the written lease or contract between them is inadmissible.

Assumpsit, on an account between a landlord and his tenant. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Ogle County; the Hon. James Shaw, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the October term, 1901.

Reversed and remanded.

Opinion filed November 15, 1901.

O’Brien *&*McHenry, attorneys for appellant.

Franc Bacon, attorney for appellee.

Mr. Justice Brown

delivered the opinion of the court.

This was an appeal from a judgment in a suit upon an open account brought by McEvoy against Smith. McEvoy was a tenant of Smith’s. The premises rented were farm lands in Ogle county.

Among other items in the account of McEvoy against Smith and for which judgment was rendered were charges for corn and oats, used by McEvoy, the tenant, for seed upon the demised premises, and also a charge for cash expended or assumed by Smith for threshing the small grain grown upon the farm during his tenancy.

The defendant, who is the appellant here, objected to the testimony in relation to these items. The objections were all overruled and exceptions duly taken.

The ruling of the Circuit Court upon the admission of this testimony is assigned for error. It is claimed that it was inadmissible because it tended to vary the terms of the written contract or lease between the parties.

The lease provided that McEvoy was to pay Smith as rent for the premises one-half of all grain raised on the farm, to be delivered by McEvoy to Smith at Davis Junction, Illinois; and that McEvoy should farm the premises with good husbandry, in due time and season, at his cost and charge.

*331The foregoing are all the provisions of the lease which are material to the issues in this case.

0 nder the lease it was the duty of McEvoy to furnish the seed grains and pay for the threshing.

The objections to the testimony should have been sustained. Its admission was error.

The judgment of the trial court must therefore be reversed and the cause remanded.
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

No. 04

- 13

- 00804

- CV

LONE STAR BAKERY, INC. and Lone Star Bakery of San Antonio, Inc., Appellants

v.

Tomas DE LA GARZA

, Appellee

From the 166th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2013

- CI

- 13819 Honorable Janet P. Littlejohn, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE MARION

, JUSTICE ALVAREZ , AND JUSTICE CHAPA

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s order is REVERSED and this cause is REMANDED to the trial court with instructions to sign an order compelling arbitration between the parties and staying all other proceedings pending the outcome of arbitration. See T EX

. C IV

. P RAC

. & R EM

. C ODE A NN

. § 171.021 (West 2011).
Costs of this appeal are taxed against Appellee Tomas De La Garza.

SIGNED August 27, 2014.

_____________________________ Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 976 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 976

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to increase the amount 
 of payment under the Medicare Program for pap smear laboratory tests.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 4, 1999

 Mr. Abercrombie (for himself and Mrs. Bono) introduced the following 
bill; which was referred to the Committee on Commerce, and in addition 
  to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently 
   determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such 
 provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to increase the amount 
 of payment under the Medicare Program for pap smear laboratory tests.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Investment in Women's Health Act of 
1999''.

SEC. 2. INCREASE IN PAYMENT AMOUNT FOR PAP SMEAR LABORATORY TESTS.

    (a) In General.--Section 1833(h) of the Social Security Act (42 
U.S.C. 1395l(h)) is amended by adding at the end the following new 
paragraph:
    ``(7) In no case shall payment under the fee schedule established 
under paragraph (1) for the laboratory test component of a diagnostic 
or screening pap smear be less than $14.60.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply with respect to laboratory tests furnished on or after January 1, 
2000.
                                 <all>
```
§ 12.21 What authority is given to Indian country law enforcement officers to perform their duties? BIA law enforcement officers are commissioned under the authority established in 25 U.S.C. 2803. BIA may issue law enforcement commissions to other Federal, State, local and tribal full-time certified law enforcement officers to obtain active assistance in enforcing applicable Federal criminal statutes, including Federal hunting and fishing regulations, in Indian country. ( a ) BIA will issue commissions to other Federal, State, local and tribal full-time certified law enforcement officers only after the head of the local government or Federal agency completes an agreement with the Commissioner of Indian Affairs asking that BIA issue delegated commissions. The agreement must include language that allows the BIA to evaluate the effectiveness of these special law enforcement commissions and to investigate any allegations of misuse of authority.
( b ) Tribal law enforcement officers operating under a BIA contract or compact are not automatically commissioned as Federal officers; however, they may be commissioned on a case-by-case basis.
# C_2013372EN.01000501.xml

| 19.12.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 372/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.12.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 372/5

---

Explanatory Notes to the Combined Nomenclature of the European Union

(2013/C 372/04)

Pursuant to the second indent of Article 9(1)(a) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 (1), the Explanatory Notes to the Combined Nomenclature of the European Union (2) are hereby amended as follows:

1

2

On page 74, between heading 1602‘Other prepared or preserved meat, meat offal or blood’ and subheading 1602 10 00‘Homogenised preparations’ the following text is inserted:

1602‘Other prepared or preserved meat, meat offal or blood’

1602 10 00‘Homogenised preparations’

‘See Additional Note 6(a) to Chapter 2 providing for the classification of uncooked seasoned poultry under Chapter 16. Whether uncooked poultry meat is seasoned or not shall be determined by application of the methods for the sensory testing of uncooked seasoned poultry meat laid down in Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1362/2013 (3).

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 of 23 July 1987 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff (OJ L 256, 7.9.1987, p. 1).

1

(2)  OJ C 137, 6.5.2011, p. 1.

2

---