alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# U.S. Strategic Bombers, ROK and U.S. Fighters Conduct Combined Aerial Training 

U.S. ARMY GARRISON HUMPHREYS, Republic of Korea -- The Republic of Korea (ROK) Air Force and the United States Air Force conducted a combined aerial training event with U.S. Air Force B-52H Stratofortresses over the Korean Peninsula today.The ROK-U.S. combined aerial training event consisted of ROK Air Force F-35’s and U.S. Air Force F-16’s escorting the U.S. B-52 strategic bombers as they entered the Korean Air Defense Identification Zone to conduct a combined flight operation.The training offered the alliance its latest opportunity to further strengthen its interoperability by demonstrating a combined defense capability and providing extended deterrence in the defense of the Korean Peninsula.The U.S. remains committed to peace and prosperity throughout the region to secure a free and open Indo-Pacific, and our commitment to the defense of the Republic of Korea remains ironclad.

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More
Exhibit 35.1

Servicer Compliance Statement of AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc.

This Annual Statement as to Compliance is delivered to you pursuant to Section 4.10 (a) of the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of
October 26, 2011 (the Agreement) and Item 1123 of Regulation AB, executed in connection with the formation of AmeriCredit Automobile Receivables Trust 2011-5 (the Trust), the issuance of the Notes by the Trust and
the closing of the transactions and the execution and delivery of the various documents by General Motors Financial Company, Inc. (f/k/a AmeriCredit Corp.), AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc. (the Servicer) and AFS SenSub Corp. in
connection therewith. The capitalized terms used herein shall have the same meanings as in the Agreement.

The undersigned certifies that
I am the Executive Vice President, Accounting Corporate Controller of the Servicer. I further certify as follows:



| | 1. | I have conducted, or caused to be conducted under my supervision, a review of the Servicer during the preceding period from January 1, 2012 through December 31, 2012, and its performance under the Agreement.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, following such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement throughout such period, and, to the best of my knowledge, there has been no default in the
fulfillment of any such obligation.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                     |  |                                 |  |  |  |                      
|------------------------------------ |  | ------------------------------- |  |  |  | ---------------------
|AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc. |  |                                 |  | 
|                                     |  |                                 | 
|By:                                  |  | /s/ Connie Coffey               |  |  |  | Dated: March 26, 2013
|                                     |  | Connie Coffey                   |  |  |  |                      
|                                     |  | Executive Vice President,       |  |  |  |                      
|                                     |  | Accounting Corporate Controller |  |  |  |
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Marine Littoral Regiment Concludes Historic Exercise, Set to Join Stand-in Forces: ‘From This Point Forward, We Are Integrating Them into Our Operations’  

By 1st Lt. Isaac Liston3rd Marine Division

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More
#### Sanford R. Hammond, Appellant, v. Mary A. Hammond and Others, Defendants, Impleaded with Jennie Foster and Others, Respondents, and Arthur B. Schenck and Others, Appellants.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Woodward, Jenks, Hooker, Gaynor and Miller, JJ., concurred.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER>   1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                          40,797
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           1,187
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    355,960
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                        987,326
<ALLOWANCE>                                     11,352
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,569,723
<DEPOSITS>                                     983,169
<SHORT-TERM>                                   183,200
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              8,416
<LONG-TERM>                                    291,500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           101
<OTHER-SE>                                     103,337
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               1,569,723
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 19,704
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                5,859
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   293
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                25,856
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               8,450
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              15,183
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           10,673
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      500
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                               (152)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 12,556
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,533
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       4,533
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,533
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.30
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.30
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.08
<LOANS-NON>                                      1,760
<LOANS-PAST>                                    53,153
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                11,152
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      691
<RECOVERIES>                                       391
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               11,352
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            11,352
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
#### Alfred PAGE, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America.

No. 15195.

United States Court of Appeals Eighth Circuit.

Nov. 12, 1954.

Alfred Page, pro se.

Harry Richards, U. S. Atty., and Robert C. Tucker, Asst. U. S. Atty., St. Louis, Mo., for appellee.

Appeal from District Court docketed and dismissed for want of prosecution, on motion of appellee.
#### Herman O’Rear v. The State.

No. 22961.

Delivered November 22, 1944.

The opinion states the case.

*Letcher D. King*and *W. E. Martin,*both of Abilene, for appellant.

*Ernest S. Goens,*State’s Attorney, of Austin, Sor the State.

*608KRUEGER, Judge.

The conviction is for the possession of whisky for the purpose of sale in a -dry area. The penalty assessed is a fine of $550.00.

There is no evidence in the record to support the av.erments in the complaint and information that a local option election had been held in Taylor County; that said election had resulted in the prohibition of the sale of intoxicating liquor; and that the result had been duly declared and published by the commissioners’ court. In the absence of such proof, the evidence is insufficient to sustain the conviction. See McQueen v. State, 162 S. W. (2d) 703, and cases there cited.

The judgment of the trial court is reversed and the cause remanded.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
IV

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 108

Designating majority membership on certain standing committees of the

House.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 11, 1999

Mr. GOODLING submitted the following resolution; which was considered and

agreed to

RESOLUTION

Designating majority membership on certain standing

committees of the House.

1 Resolved, That the following named Members be, and

2 they are hereby, elected to the following standing commit3 tees of the House of Representatives:

4 COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY: Mr. Scarborough of

5 Florida.

6 COMMITTEE ON VETERANS’ AFFAIRS: Mr. Baker of

7 Louisiana.

Æ
§ 115.620 If you decide to appeal the BIA's final decision pursuant to § 115.107, will the BIA restrict your IIM account during the appeal? Yes, if under § 115.107 you or your guardian, as applicable, decide to appeal the BIA's final decision to: ( a ) Supervise your IIM account, your IIM account will remain restricted during the appeal period.
( b ) Encumber your IIM account, your IIM account will remain restricted up to the amount at issue during the appeal period. If your account balance is greater than the amount encumbered, those funds will be available to you upon request to and by approval of the Secretary.
### **CHAPTER 1221—SEPARATION**

Sec.
12681.
Reserves: discharge authority.
12682.
Reserves: discharge upon becoming ordained minister of religion.
12683.
Reserve officers: limitation on involuntary separation.
12684.
Reserves: separation for absence without authority or sentence to imprisonment.
12685.
Reserves separated for cause: character of discharge.
12686.
Reserves on active duty within two years of retirement eligibility: limitation on release from active duty.
12687.
Reserves under confinement by sentence of court-martial: separation after six months confinement.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**1996**—Pub. L. 104–106, div. A, title V, §563(a)(2)(B), Feb. 10, 1996, 110 Stat. 325, added item 12687.
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03

- 22

- 00057

- CV

Billy Wayne Duffie, Jr. , Appellant

v. Taylor M. Days , Appellee

FROM THE 169TH DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY NO. 21DFAM328489 , THE HONORABLE CARI L. STARRITT

- BURNETT , JUDGE PRE S IDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

The clerk’s record in this appeal was due for filing in this Court on March 21,
2022

. On April 18, 2022, we notified appellant that no clerk’s record had been filed due to hi s
failure t o p ay or make arrangements to pay the trial clerk’s fee for preparing the clerk’s record. The notice requested that appellant make arrangements for the clerk’s record and submit a status report regarding this appeal by April 28, 2022. Further, the notice a d v ised appellant that his failure to comply with this request could result in the dismissal of the appeal for want of prosecution. On April 21, 2022, a ppellant requested more time to file. On May 23, 2022, we
sent a second notice that no clerk’s record h a d been filed due to hi s failure to pay or make arrangements to pay the trial clerk’s fee for preparing the clerk’s record. The second notice requested that appellant make arrangements for the clerk’s record and submit a status report2 regarding this app ea l by June 2, 2022

. To date, appellant has not filed a status report or otherwise responded to this Court’s notice, and the clerk’s record has not been filed.
If a trial

- court clerk fails to file the clerk’s record due to an appellant’s failure to

pay or make arrangements to pay for the clerk’s fee for preparing the record, the appellate court

may dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless the appellant was entitled to proceed without payment of costs. Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b). In this case, ap pel l ant has not established
that he is entitled to proceed without payment of costs. See Tex. R. Civ. P. 145 . Because appellant has failed to pay o r make arrangements to pay the clerk’s fee for preparing the clerk’s record, this appeal is dismissed for w ant of prosecution.

____________ ______________________________ Gisela D. Triana , Justice
Before Justices Goodwin, Baker, and Triana
Dismissed for Want of Prosecu tion
Filed: June 24, 2022
#### People of the State of Illinois, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Donald Harvey, Defendant-Appellant.

Gen. No. 50,089.

First District, Second Division,

September 28, 1965.

*481Thomas B. Hart, Jr., of Chicago, for plaintiff in error; Daniel P. Ward, State’s Attorney of Cook County, of Chicago (Elmer C. Kissane and E. Roger Horsky, Assistant State’s Attorneys, of counsel), for defendant in error.

Opinion by

JUSTICE BRYANT.

Not to be published in full.
EXHIBIT 31

CERTIFICATION

I,
Jeffrey L. Zelms, President & Chief Executive Officer, certify that:

Date:
June 4, 2004

|By:                                                  |  | /s/JEFFREY L. ZELMS |  | 
|---------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------- |  | 
|Jeffrey L. Zelms
President & Chief Executive Officer |  |                    

---



CERTIFICATION

I,
David A. Chaput, Chief Financial Officer, certify that:

Date:
June 4, 2004

|By:                                     |  | /s/DAVID A. CHAPUT |  | 
|--------------------------------------- |  | ------------------ |  | 
|David A. Chaput
Chief Financial Officer |  |                   

---



QuickLinks
Order filed December 22, 2016

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 16

- 00153

- CR

____________ BRENT JUSTICE , Appellant

V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 176th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1385768



### O R D E R

The clerk’s record was filed June 15, 2016. Our review has determined that a
relevant item has been omitted from the clerk's record. See Tex. R. App. P. 34.5(c).
The record does not contain the indictment.
The Harris County District Clerk is directed to file a supplemental clerk’s record on or before January 6, 2017, containing the indictment.If the omitted item is not part of the case file, the district clerk is directed to

file a supplemental clerk’s record containing a ce rtified statement that the omitted item is not a part of the case file.

PER CURIAM
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE COSINE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC. CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF SEPTEMBER 30,
2000 (UNAUDITED) AND THE STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 (UNAUDITED) AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                         285,012
<SECURITIES>                                    56,971
<RECEIVABLES>                                   19,078
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      9,051
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               356,602
<PP&E>                                          30,760
<DEPRECIATION>                                   7,152
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 381,270
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           42,072
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            10
<OTHER-SE>                                     325,609
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   381,270
<SALES>                                         14,823
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                14,823
<CGS>                                           14,266
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   14,266
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               112,242
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,257
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (109,308)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (109,308)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (2,500)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (111,808)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (1.50)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.50)


</TABLE>
CHKISTmAn 

SINC E 189 4 

^"•.RTWENFOF 

' •• 3!^CRi7JION 

February 9, 2012 

Docket Management Facility 

U.S. Department of Transportation, 

1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., 

West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 

Washington, DC 20590. 

Re: Sun Country Slot Exemption - Docket Number FAA-2012-0089 

Ladies and Gentlemen: 

Sun Country Airlines has requested an exemption from the slot limit for Ronald Reagan Washington 

National Airport (DCA) set forth in § 93.123(a), to permit the FAA to create air carrier slots during 

certain limited hours for Sun Country's use. The proposed air carrier slots would replace two slot 

exemptions under DOT Order 2010-12-16 awarded to Sun Country. On January 6, 2012, the United 

States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit vacated the DOT Order, and Sun Country 

will lose its existing service between DCA and Lansing's Capital Region International Airport 

Specifically, Sun Country desires one daily slot during each of the 1000 and 1100 hours. The proposed 

exemption would permit Sun Country to continue operating its existing services and avoid an 

inequitable result of the Court's order. 

The Sun Country DCA service is essential to the economic growth of the Greater Lansing Region. The 

daily service is the only large aircraft (737-800) service to Washington Reagan Airport, in the state of 

Michigan outside of Detroit Prior to Sun Country, the regional community had requested the 

introduction of this service from numerous other airline operators without success. Accordingly, it is 

critical that the FAA take the necessary steps to ensure the continuation of the Sun Country slots at the 

established flight times in support of Greater Lansing's business and economic growth. 

Your immediate approval of this exemption, so that Sun Country can begin to enter flights schedules for 

sale for the balance of 2012, will be greatly appreciated. 

Sincerely, 

T he ChKstrnan Company 

Anm<Jhy Pec^ 

Vice President 

The Chnstman Company The Chnslrnan Building 208 N. Capitol Avenue Lansing, Michigan 48933-1 357