Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 6 / Monday, January 10, 2011 / Notices 1415 

4Availability of funds for the i3 program in FY 

2011 and in subsequent years is contingent upon an 

appropriation of funds for the program by the 

Congress. 

the maximum possible points assigned 

to each criterion. 

Note: This notice does not solicit 

applications. In any year in which we choose 

to use these priorities, requirements, and 

selection criteria, we invite applications 

through a notice in the Federal Register.4

Executive Order 12866: Under 

Executive Order 12866, the Secretary 

must determine whether a regulatory 

action is ‘‘significant’’ and therefore 

subject to the requirements of the 

Executive order and subject to review by 

the Office of Management and Budget. 

Section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866 

defines a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ 

as an action likely to result in a rule that 

may (1) have an annual effect on the 

economy of $100 million or more, or 

adversely affect a sector of the economy, 

productivity, competition, jobs, the 

environment, public health or safety, or 

State, local or Tribal governments or 

communities in a material way (also 

referred to as an ‘‘economically 

significant’’ rule); (2) create serious 

inconsistency or otherwise interfere 

with an action taken or planned by 

another agency; (3) materially alter the 

budgetary impacts of entitlement grants, 

user fees, or local programs or the rights 

and obligations of recipients thereof; or 

(4) raise novel legal or policy issues 

arising out of legal mandates, the 

President’s priorities, or the principles 

set forth in the Executive order. The 

Secretary has determined that this 

regulatory action is not significant 

under section 3(f) of the Executive 

order. 

This notice has been reviewed in 

accordance with Executive Order 12866. 

Under the terms of the order, we have 

assessed the potential costs and benefits 

of this proposed regulatory action. 

The potential costs associated with 

this proposed regulatory action are 

those resulting from statutory 

requirements and those we have 

determined as necessary for 

administering the Department’s 

discretionary grant programs effectively 

and efficiently. 

In assessing the potential costs and 

benefits—both quantitative and 

qualitative—of this proposed regulatory 

action, we have determined that the 

benefits of the proposed priorities and 

definitions justify the costs. 

We have determined, also, that this 

proposed regulatory action does not 

unduly interfere with State, local, and 

Tribal governments in the exercise of 

their governmental functions. 

Summary of Potential Costs and 

Benefits 

This proposed regulatory action 

affects only LEAs and nonprofit 

organizations that are applying for 

assistance under the i3 program. This 

regulatory action creates flexibility for 

the Department to (a) select from among 

the priorities and selection criteria that 

were established in the 2010 NFP 

specific priorities and criteria to use in 

the FY 2011 i3 grant competition and 

those in subsequent years, and (b) select 

other selection criteria under 34 CFR 

75.209 and 75.210. We believe that any 

priority or criterion that would be used 

in a future grant competition would not 

impose a financial burden that LEAs 

and nonprofit organizations would not 

otherwise incur in the development and 

submission of a grant application under 

the i3 program, and under some 

circumstances (for example, if the 

Department elected to use fewer criteria 

or factors in a given competition) the 

proposed changes could reduce the 

financial burden of preparing an i3 grant 

application by a modest amount. 

Additionally, although the ‘‘Limits on 

Grant Awards’’ and ‘‘Cost Sharing or 

Matching’’ requirements are i3 program 

requirements, both requirements affect 

only the highest-rated applications from 

the peer review process that are also 

determined to be eligible for an i3 grant 

award. Therefore, we believe that the 

proposed modifications to the 

requirements would not impose a 

financial burden that LEAs and 

nonprofit organizations would not 

otherwise incur in the development and 

submission of a grant application under 

the i3 program. 

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 

This notice contains information 

collection requirements that are subject 

to review by the Office of Management 

and Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork 

Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501– 

3520). The burden associated with 

CFDA Nos. 84.396A/B/C was approved 

by OMB under OMB Control Number 

1855–0021, which expires on October 

31, 2013. These proposed revisions to 

priorities, requirements, and selection 

criteria would allow the Department to 

improve the design of the i3 program to 

better achieve its purposes and goals by 

(a) establishing the flexibility to select 

priorities and selection criteria and (b) 

modifying the ‘‘Limits on Grant Awards’’ 

and ‘‘Cost Sharing or Matching’’ 

requirements. However, the revisions do 

not change the number of applications 

an organization may submit or the 

burden that an applicant would 

otherwise incur in the development and 

submission of a grant application under 

the i3 program. Therefore, the 

Department expects that this proposed 

regulatory action will not affect the total 

burden of 150,000 hours. 

Intergovernmental Review: This 

program is subject to Executive Order 

12372 and the regulations in 34 CFR 

part 79. One of the objectives of the 

Executive order is to foster an 

intergovernmental partnership and a 

strengthened federalism. The Executive 

order relies on processes developed by 

State and local governments for 

coordination and review of proposed 

Federal financial assistance. 

This document provides early 

notification of our specific plans and 

actions for this program. 

Accessible Format: Individuals with 

disabilities can obtain this document in 

an accessible format (e.g., braille, large 

print, audiotape, or computer diskette) 

on request to the program contact 

person listed under FOR FURTHER

INFORMATION CONTACT. 

Electronic Access to This Document: 

You can view this document, as well as 

all other documents of this Department 

published in the Federal Register, in 

text or Adobe Portable Document 

Format (PDF) on the Internet at the 

following site: http://www.ed.gov/news/ 

fedregister. 

To use PDF you must have Adobe 

Acrobat Reader, which is available free 

at this site. If you have questions about 

using PDF, call the U.S. Government 

Printing Office (GPO), toll free, at 1– 

888–293–6498; or in the Washington, 

DC, area at (202) 512–1530. 

Note: The official version of this document 

is the document published in the Federal 

Register. Free Internet access to the official 

edition of the Federal Register and the Code 

of Federal Regulations is available on GPO 

Access at: http://www.gpoaccess.gov/nara/ 

index.html. 

Dated: January 5, 2011. 

James H. Shelton, III, 

Assistant Deputy Secretary for Innovation and 

Improvement. 

[FR Doc. 2011–269 Filed 1–7–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4000–01–P 

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 

Environmental Management SiteSpecific Advisory Board, Oak Ridge 

Reservation 

AGENCY: Department of Energy. 

ACTION: Notice of cancellation of open 

meeting. 

SUMMARY: This notice announces the 

cancellation of the January 12, 2011, 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
1416 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 6 / Monday, January 10, 2011 / Notices 

meeting of the Environmental 

Management Site-Specific Advisory 

Board (EM SSAB), Oak Ridge 

Reservation. The Federal Advisory 

Committee Act (Pub. L. 92–463, 86 Stat. 

770) requires that public notice of this 

meeting cancellation be announced in 

the Federal Register. The next regular 

meeting will be held on February 9, 

2011. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Patricia J. Halsey, Federal Coordinator, 

Department of Energy Oak Ridge 

Operations Office, P.O. Box 2001, EM– 

90, Oak Ridge, TN 37831. Phone (865) 

576–4025; Fax (865) 576–2347 or e-mail: 

halseypj@oro.doe.gov or check the Web 

site at http://www.oakridge.doe.gov/em/ 

ssab. 

Issued at Washington, DC, on January 6, 

2011. 

LaTanya R. Butler, 

Acting Deputy Committee Management 

Officer. 

[FR Doc. 2011–339 Filed 1–6–11; 4:15 pm] 

BILLING CODE 6405–01–P 

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 

Federal Energy Regulatory 

Commission 

[Project No. 6552–021] 

HDI Associates V; Sprague Hydro LLC; 

Notice of Application for Transfer of 

License, and Soliciting Comments and 

Motions To Intervene 

December 29, 2010. 

On December 10, 2010, HDI 

Associates V (transferor) and Sprague 

Hydro LLC (transferee) filed an 

application for transfer of license for the 

North Fork Sprague River Hydroelectric 

Project No. 6552, located on the North 

Fork Sprague River in Klamath County, 

Oregon. 

Applicants seek Commission approval 

to transfer the license for the North Fork 

Sprague River Hydroelectric Project 

from transferor to transferee. 

Applicants’ Contact: Transferor: Craig 

Smith, Grayco, LLC, P.O. Box 566, 

Gresham, Oregon 97030, (503) 618–8717 

ext. 105. For Transferee: Ted S. 

Sorenson, Sprague Hydro LLC, 5203 

South 11th East, Idaho Falls, Idaho 

83404, (208) 522–8069. 

FERC Contact: Jeremy M. Jessup, 

(202) 502–6779, Jeremy.Jessup@ferc.gov. 

Deadline for filing comments and 

motions to intervene: 30 days from the 

issuance date of this notice. Comments 

and motions to intervene may be filed 

electronically via the Internet. See 18 

CFR 385.2001(a)(1) and the instructions 

on the Commission’s Web site under 

http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/ 

efiling.asp. Commenters can submit 

brief comments up to 6,000 characters, 

without prior registration, using the 

eComment system at http:// 

www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/ 

ecomment.asp. You must include your 

name and contact information at the end 

of your comments. If unable to be filed 

electronically, documents may be paperfiled. To paper-file, an original plus 

seven copies should be mailed to: 

Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary, Federal 

Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 

First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426. 

More information about this project can 

be viewed or printed on the eLibrary 

link of Commission’s Web site at 

http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/ 

elibrary.asp. Enter the docket number 

(P–6552) in the docket number field to 

access the document. For assistance, 

call toll-free 1–866–208–3372. 

Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr., 

Deputy Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 2011–181 Filed 1–7–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6717–01–P 

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 

Federal Energy Regulatory 

Commission 

Combined Notice of Filings #1 

December 30, 2010. 

Take notice that the Commission 

received the following electric corporate 

filings: 

Docket Numbers: EC11–34–000. 

Applicants: White Oak Energy 

Holdings LLC. 

Description: Application for 

Authorization for Disposition of 

Jurisdictional Facilities, Request for 

Confidential Treatment, and Request for 

Expedited Consideration of White Oak 

Energy Holdings LLC. 

Filed Date: 12/30/2010. 

Accession Number: 20101230–5140. 

Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time 

on Thursday, January 20, 2011. 

Take notice that the Commission 

received the following electric rate 

filings: 

Docket Numbers: ER93–3–000. 

Applicants: United Illuminating 

Company, The. 

Description: Updated Market Power 

Analysis of The United Illuminating 

Company. 

Filed Date: 12/30/2010. 

Accession Number: 20101230–5148. 

Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time 

on Monday, February 28, 2011. 

Docket Numbers: ER98–4159–019; 

ER04–268–017; ER06–398–014; ER06– 

399–014; ER07–157–011; ER10–622– 

004. 

Applicants: Duquesne Light 

Company, Macquarie Energy LLC. 

Description: Updated Market Power 

Analysis of the Duquesne Companies 

and Macquarie Energy LLC. 

Filed Date: 12/30/2010. 

Accession Number: 20101230–5136. 

Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time 

on Monday, February 28, 2011. 

Docket Numbers: ER99–1522–006; 

ER02–723–005; ER04–359–004; ER06– 

796–004; ER07–553–003; ER07–554– 

003; ER07–555–003; ER07–556–003; 

ER07–557–003. 

Applicants: Emera Energy Services 

Subsidiary No. 2 LLC, Emera Energy 

Services Subsidiary No. 3 LLC, Emera 

Energy Services Subsidiary No. 5 LLC, 

Emera Energy Services, Inc., Bangor 

Hydro Electric Company, Emera Energy 

U.S. Subsidiary No. 1, Inc., Emera 

Energy U.S. Subsidiary No. 2, Inc., 

Emera Energy Services Subsidiary No. 1 

LLC, Emera Energy Services Subsidiary 

No. 4 LLC. 

Description: Triennial Update of 

Bangor Hydro Electric Company, et al. 

Filed Date: 12/29/2010. 

Accession Number: 20101229–5135. 

Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time 

on Monday, February 28, 2011. 

Docket Numbers: ER00–3621–013; 

ER01–468–012; ER02–23–016; ER04– 

249–009; ER04–318–009; ER05–34–009; 

ER05–35–009; ER05–36–009; ER05–37– 

009; ER07–1306–008; ER08–1323–004; 

ER96–2869–017; ER97–30–010; ER97– 

3561–009; ER99–1695–018. 

Applicants: Dominion Nuclear 

Connecticut, Inc.; Dominion Energy 

Marketing, Inc.; Fairless Energy, LLC; 

Dominion Retail, Inc.; Dominion Energy 

Kewaunee, Inc.; Dominion Energy New 

England, Inc.; Dominion Energy Salem 

Harbor, LLC; Dominion Energy Brayton 

Point, LLC; Dominion Energy 

Manchester Street, Inc.; NedPower Mt. 

Storm, LLC; Fowler Ridge Wind Farm 

LLC; State Line Energy, LLC; Kincaid 

Generation, L.L.C.; Virginia Electric and 

Power Company; Elwood Energy, LLC. 

Description: Dominion Resources 

Services, Inc. Supplement to Market 

Power Analyses. 

Filed Date: 12/30/2010. 

Accession Number: 20101230–5102. 

Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time 

on Thursday, January 20, 2011. 

Docket Numbers: ER00–2918–021; 

ER01–1654–024; ER02–2567–021; 

ER04–485–019; ER05–261–014; ER05– 

556–002; ER05–728–014; ER08–537– 

003; ER10–1443–002; ER10–2172–001; 

ER10–2174–001; ER10–2176–001; 

ER10–2178–001; ER10–2179–001; 

ER10–2180–001; ER10–2181–001; 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES