alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

# Statement by Secretary of Defense Lloyd J. Austin III on the President's Fiscal Year 2024 Budget

DoD Immediate Release

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More
**Exhibit 13.2**

 

**Certification of the ChiefFinancial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,**

**As Adopted Pursuant to Section906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Anchiano Therapeutics Ltd.(the “Company”) hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge that:

 

1.       Theaccompanying Annual Report on Form 20-F of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2018 (the “Report”) fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

2.       Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operationsof the Company.

 

 

Date: March 25, 2019

 

**Jonathan Burgin**

**Chief Financial and Operating Officer**

**Anchiano Therapeutics Ltd.**

 

The foregoing certification is being furnished solelyto accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and is not being filed for the purposes of Section 18 of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference to any filing of the Company, whether made beforeor after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MARIUSZ BUCHNA; JULITA

BUCHNA,

 Plaintiffs - Appellants,

 v.

BANK OF AMERICA, NA; BANK OF

NEW YORK MELLON

CORPORATION; MORTGAGE

ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION

SYSTEMS INCORPORATED,

 Defendants - Appellees.

No. 10-17651

D.C. No. 2:10-cv-00418-MHM

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Arizona

Mary H. MURGUIA, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted June 15, 2012

San Francisco, California

Before: HUG, RAWLINSON, and IKUTA, Circuit Judges.

Mariusz and Julita Buchna appeal the district court’s dismissal of their

action against Bank of America, N.A., Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems

FILED

JUL 11 2012

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2

Inc. (MERS), and Bank of New York Mellon Corporation. Because the parties are

familiar with the factual and procedural history of this case, we need not recount it

here. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

The Buchnas argue that the note and deed of trust were split, rendering the

non-judicial foreclosure provisions in the deed of trust unenforceable. That

argument fails to state a claim because it is based on nothing more than conclusory

speculation that the parties exercising power under the deed of trust are not the

note holder or agents of the note holder. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 8; Bell Atl. Corp. v.

Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 555 (2007); Cervantes v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc.,

656 F.3d 1034, 1044 (9th Cir. 2011). The Buchnas do not dispute that they are in

default under the deed of trust and have alleged no reason to dispute the trustee’s

right to foreclose. See Hogan v. Wash. Mut. Bank, N.A., 277 P.3d 781, 784 (Ariz.

2012) (en banc). The Buchnas’ argument that the beneficiary was required to

prove ownership of the note before instituting a non-judicial foreclosure

proceeding also fails to state a claim. Id. at 783–84. 

The Buchnas argue that defendants-appellees are not permitted to enforce

the power of sale provision in the deed of trust because they are not persons

entitled to enforce a negotiable instrument under § 47-3301 of Arizona’s Uniform

Commercial Code. That argument fails to state a claim because Arizona law does
3

“not require compliance with the UCC before a trustee commences a non-judicial

foreclosure.” Id. at 783. 

The Buchnas’ argument based on their contention that MERS is not a valid

beneficiary also fails to state a claim. See Cervantes, 656 F.3d at 1044. 

We reject the remainder of the Buchnas’ arguments for the reasons stated by

the district court.

The district court did not err in entering judgment against the Buchnas, and

therefore implicitly denying leave to amend their complaint, because amendment

would have been futile. See Gardner v. Martino, 563 F.3d 981, 990 (9th Cir.

2009).

AFFIRMED.
**Exhibit 10.09**

**AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO**

**STOCK PURCHASE AGREEMENT**

This AMENDMENT NO. 1 (this “Amendment”), dated as of February 14, 2014, [***], dated as of January 29, 2014 (the“Agreement”), by and between Xenetic Biosciences, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”), and Baxter Healthcare SA (the “Investor”). 

WHEREAS, the Company and the [***] desire to modify the definition of “[***]” in the Agreement in order to ensure that the [***]subject to the [***] properly measured; and 

WHEREAS, capitalized terms used but not otherwise defined in this Amendment shall have themeanings assigned to them in the Agreement; 

NOW THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which arehereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows: 

 

The definition of [***] in Section 4(d)of the Agreement is hereby amended to mean the period from (i) [***] on the date of the Agreement to (ii) [***] following the date thereof. 

 

(a) Counterparts. This Amendment may be executed inmultiple counterparts (including by means of telecopied signature pages or signature pages in “.pdf”, “.tif” or similar format sent as an attachment to an electronic mail message), each of which shall be deemed an original, butall of which taken together shall constitute one and the same instrument. 

(b) Choice of Law. The construction, validity andinterpretation of this Amendment will be governed by and construed in accordance with the internal [***], without giving effect to principles of conflicts of laws or choice of law of [***] or any other jurisdiction which would result in theapplication of the law of any jurisdiction other than the [***]. 

(c) Entire Agreement. The Agreement, as amended by thisAmendment, contains the complete agreement among the parties hereto and supersedes any prior understanding, agreement or representation by or among the parties hereto, written or oral, that may have related to the subject matter hereof in any way.Other than as specifically amended by the terms hereof, the Agreement remains in full force and effect. 

*** * * * ***

**IN WITNESS WHEREOF,** the parties hereto have executed this Amendment on the date firstwritten above. 

 
**THE COMPANY:****XENETIC BIOSCIENCES, INC.**By: 
/s/ M. Scott Maguire
 Name: M. Scott Maguire Title: CEO**INVESTOR:****BAXTER HEALTHCARE SA**By: 
 
 Name:  Title: By: 
 
 Name:  Title:
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

# Marines, Navy, AF Take Part in 3-day Surge during Exercise Forager Fury II

By Airman 1st Class Emily A. Bradley36th Wing Public Affairs

                ANDERSEN AIR FORCE BASE, Guam  –              http://www.andersen.af.mil/news/story.asp?id=123374490

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT
### §1800. Definitions

In this subchapter:

(1) The term "military child development center" means a facility on a military installation (or on property under the jurisdiction of the commander of a military installation) at which child care services are provided for members of the armed forces or any other facility at which such child care services are provided that is operated by the Secretary of a military department.

(2) The term "family home day care" means home-based child care services that are provided for members of the armed forces by an individual who (A) is certified by the Secretary of the military department concerned as qualified to provide those services, and (B) provides those services on a regular basis for compensation.

(3) The term "child care employee" means a civilian employee of the Department of Defense who is employed to work in a military child development center (regardless of whether the employee is paid from appropriated funds or nonappropriated funds).

(4) The term "child care fee receipts" means those nonappropriated funds that are derived from fees paid by members of the armed forces for child care services provided at military child development centers.

(Added Pub. L. 104–106, div. A, title V, §568(a)(1), Feb. 10, 1996, 110 Stat. 335, §1798; renumbered §1800, Pub. L. 106–65, div. A, title V, §584(a)(1)(A), Oct. 5, 1999, 113 Stat. 634.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1999—Pub. L. 106–65 renumbered section 1798 of this title as this section.
#### § 162.427 Will BIA notify a lessee when a payment is due under a business lease?

Upon request of the Indian landowners, we may issue invoices to a lessee in advance of the dates on which payments are due under a business lease. The lessee's obligation to make these payments in a timely manner will not be excused if invoices are not issued, delivered, or received.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                          19,943
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                19,943
<PP&E>                                           3,406
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  23,349
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,881,627
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      8,810
<COMMON>                                        19,499
<OTHER-SE>                                   7,877,836
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    23,349
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               321,895
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              28,221
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (321,895)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (370,116)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.007)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0



</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998             DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998             SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                          22,768                  18,856
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,902                  16,511
<ALLOWANCES>                                       134                     657
<INVENTORY>                                     11,741                  25,780
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                41,672                  63,481
<PP&E>                                          15,320                  30,536
<DEPRECIATION>                                   9,458                  11,523
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 182,616                 215,553
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           27,675                  44,501
<BONDS>                                        218,667                 219,328
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                           473                     473
<OTHER-SE>                                    (64,199)                (87,249)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   182,616                 215,553
<SALES>                                              0                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               106,382                 184,330
<CGS>                                           74,039                 133,218
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   74,039                 133,218
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 8,123                  17,717
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            (11,335)                (22,049)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,912                (13,168)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       193                     106
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,719                (13,274)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,719                (13,274)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0                       0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0                       0


</TABLE>
§ 162.449 May a lessee assign a business lease? ( a ) A lessee may assign a business lease by meeting the consent requirements in § 162.450 and obtaining our approval of the assignment under §§ 162.451 and 162.452, or by meeting the conditions in paragraphs (b) or (c) of this section.
( b ) Where provided in the lease, the lessee may assign the lease to the following without meeting consent requirements or obtaining BIA approval of the assignment, as long as the lessee notifies BIA of the assignment within 30 days after it is executed: ( 1 ) Not more than three distinct legal entities specified in the lease; or
( 2 ) The lessee's wholly owned subsidiaries.
( c ) The lessee may assign the lease without our approval or meeting consent requirements if: ( 1 ) The assignee is a leasehold mortgagee or its designee, acquiring the lease either through foreclosure or by conveyance;
( 2 ) The assignee agrees in writing to assume all of the obligations and conditions of the lease; and
( 3 ) The assignee agrees in writing that any transfer of the lease will be in accordance with applicable law under § 162.014.
**Exhibit
      32.1**





Certification
      Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.
§1350)





I,
      Thomas
      W. Martin, Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President of ICON Capital
      Corp., the General Partner of the Registrant in connection with the Quarterly
      Report of ICON Income Fund Eight A L.P. (the "Partnership") on Form 10-Q/A
      for
      the period ended September 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
      Commission on the date hereof (the "Quarterly Report") certify, pursuant to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my
      knowledge:





1.
            The
                Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                13(a) or
                15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. §78m);
                and





2.
            The
                information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in
                all
                material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
                of
                the Partnership.








*Dated:
      December 11, 2007*





*/s/
      Thomas W. Martin*


Thomas
      W.
      Martin


Chairman,
      Chief Executive Officer and President of the General Partner


(Principal
      Executive Officer)


ICON
      Capital Corp.


General
      Partner of ICON Income Fund Eight A L.P.
#### Talbot Mills, Inc., a Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Sam Benezra and Morris Benezra, Individually and as Co-partners d/b/a Super Togs Co., Defendants-Appellees, and Goldblatt Bros., Inc., a Corporation, Garnishee-Defendant-Appellee.

Gen. No. 49,989.

First District, Fourth Division.

June 30, 1965.

Teller, Levit and Silvertrust, of Chicago (Joseph L. Matz and Howard M. Turner, of counsel), for appellant;

Goldberg & Levin, of Chicago (Mayer Goldberg and Marvin Sacks, of counsel), for appellees.

Opinion by

JUSTICE DRUCKER.

Not to be published in full.
#### §§ 102.131-102.139 [Reserved]
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# U.S., Japan, Republic of Korea Conduct Third Trilateral Aerial Exercise

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command Public Affairs

For the third time following the historic trilateral summit at Camp David in fall 2023, fighter aircraft from the U.S., Japan, and the Republic of Korea conducted the third trilateral aerial escort flight of U.S. bombers operating in the Indo-Pacific, April 2, 2024.

U.S. F-16s from the 80th Fighter Squadron, 8th Fighter Wing flew alongside Japan Air Self-Defense Force (JASDF) F-2s from the 8th Air Wing, and Republic of Korea Air Force (ROKAF) F-15Ks from the 11th Wing, escorting two U.S. Air Force B-52H Stratofortess Bombers.

The enhanced complexity and fluidity of our collective forces demonstrate the strength of the partnership and cooperation between the three countries, keeping with commitments made to regularize defensive exercise and increase readiness.

Our commitment underscores the shared vision for a secure, rules-based, and open Indo-Pacific region.

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Avalon Holdings Corporation on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Timothy C. Coxson,
Chief Financial Officer of Avalon Holdings Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Avalon Holdings Corporation.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Timothy C. Coxson  
|Timothy C. Coxson      
|Chief Financial Officer
|August 13, 2004