alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS**

 

I, Brian E. Schaaf, certify that:

 

1.                                    I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Ford Credit Auto Lease Trust 2011-B (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);

 

2.                                    Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.                                    Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

 

4.                                    I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer and based on my knowledge and the compliance review conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and

 

5.                                    All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

 

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: The Bank of New York Mellon, as indenture trustee of the issuing entity, and U.S. Bank Trust National Association, as owner trustee of the issuing entity.

 

Dated March 26, 2013

 
|   | /s/   Brian E. Schaaf                              |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------|
|   | Brian   E. Schaaf                                  |
|   | Vice   President and Assistant Treasurer           |
|   | Ford   Motor Credit Company LLC, as Servicer       |
|   | (senior   officer in charge of servicing function) |

 

----
*

 Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 95-50552

Summary Calendar

__________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

RALPH J. HINOJOSA,

 Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. A-90-CA-112-JN

- - - - - - - - - -

January 12, 1996

Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, DAVIS and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Ralph J. Hinojosa appeals from the district court's denial of his motion to vacate, set aside,

or correct his sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Hinojosa argues that the district court

erred by assessing a four-level increase for his role in the offense pursuant to U.S.S.G. §

3B1.1(a), that the district court erred by assessing criminal history points for 

an unclassified misdemeanor, that he was entitled to an additional one-level reduction for

acceptance of responsibility pursuant to 

§ 3E1.1, and that the district court erred in determining the amount of his fine under § 5E1.2. We

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons

stated by the district court. See Hinojosa v. United States, No. A-95-CA-112 JN, A-90-CR-124

JN (W.D. Tex. June 28, 1995). Hinojosa's assertion that his motions for discovery and inspection
No. 95-50552

-2-

and for itemized cost of each discovery item were improperly denied was not adequately briefed

and is thus deemed abandoned on appeal. See Yohey v. Collins, 985 F.2d 222, 225 (5th Cir.

1993). The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 33.2















Report on Assessment of Compliance
with Regulation AB Servicing Criteria



Midland Loan Services ("Midland"),
a division of PNC Bank, National Association, is responsible for assessing compliance with the applicable servicing criteria set
forth in Item 1122 (d) of Regulation AB of the Securities and Exchange Commission ("Regulation AB") relating to its role
in the servicing of commercial mortgage-backed securities transactions.



Midland has assessed its compliance with
the applicable servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2011. In making this assessment, Midland used the criteria
set forth by the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") in Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB. This report covers the
commercial mortgage-backed securities transactions (the "Platform").



Based on such assessment, Midland believes
that, as of and for the year ended December 31, 2011, Midland has complied in all material respects with the servicing criteria
set forth in Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB relating to its role in the servicing of commercial mortgage-backed securities transactions,
except for servicing criteria 1122(d)(l)(iii), 1122(d)(3)(i)(B), 1122(d)(3)(i)(C), 1122(d)(3)(i)(D), 1122(d)(3)(ii), 1122(d)(3)(iii),
1122(d)(3)(iv), and 1122(d)(4)(xv), which Midland has determined as being inapplicable to the activities it performs with respect
to the commercial mortgage-backed securities transactions being serviced (the "applicable servicing criteria").



PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent
registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report on Midland's assessment of compliance with the applicable servicing
criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2011.



MIDLAND LOAN SERVICES

a division of PNC Bank, National Association







|/s/ Steven W. Smith      | /s/ Robert D. Gahagan | /s/Bradley J.Hauger  
|------------------------ | --------------------- | ---------------------
|                         |                       |                      
|Steven W. Smith          | Robert D. Gahagan     | Bradley J.Hauger     
|Executive Vice President | Vice President        | Senior Vice President





Date: February 24, 2012











Member of The PNC Financial Services Group

10851 Mastin Boulevard    Overland Park, Kansas 66210

800-327-8083

www.pnc.com/midland
### Surficial geology and geomorphology of the Lake Tapps quadrangle, Washington

By: D. R. Crandell

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/pp388A

#### Links

- More information:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**                            (html)
-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf) 
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 943

To reimburse an individual who is the subject of an independent counsel’s

investigation and is indicted but found not guilty for attorneys’ fees.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 2, 1999

Mr. THOMPSON of Mississippi (for himself, Mr. CLYBURN, Mr. CLAY, Ms.

MCKINNEY, Mr. LAFALCE, Ms. JACKSON-LEE of Texas, Mr. KING, Mrs.

MINK of Hawaii, Mr. FRANK of Massachusetts, Mr. HILLIARD, Ms. KILPATRICK, Mr. FALEOMAVAEGA, Mr. LANTOS, Mr. BRADY of Pennsylvania, Mr. WYNN, Mrs. CLAYTON, Mr. OWENS, Mr. SABO, Mr. FORD,

Mr. CUMMINGS, Mr. SCOTT, and Mr. RUSH) introduced the following bill;

which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To reimburse an individual who is the subject of an independent counsel’s investigation and is indicted but found

not guilty for attorneys’ fees.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. ATTORNEYS’ FEES FOR INDEPENDENT COUN4 SEL INVESTIGATION.

5 Section 593(f)(1) of title 28, United States Code, is

6 amended by striking ‘‘may, if no indictment is brought

7 against such individual pursuant to that investigation,
2

•HR 943 IH

1 award reimbursement for those reasonable attorneys’

2 fees’’ and inserting ‘‘may—

3 ‘‘(A) if no indictment is brought against

4 such individual pursuant to that investigation,

5 or

6 ‘‘(B) if an indictment is brought against

7 such individual pursuant to that investigation

8 but such individual is found not guilty of any

9 offense charged in the indictment,

10 award reimbursement for those reasonable attorneys’

11 fees’’.

12 SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

13 The amendment made by section 1 shall take effect

14 with respect to investigations begun before the date of the

15 enactment of this Act.

Æ
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Avalon Holdings Corporation on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2010 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Timothy C. Coxson, Chief Financial Officer of Avalon Holdings Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Avalon Holdings Corporation.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Timothy C. Coxson  
|Timothy C. Coxson      
|Chief Financial Officer
|May 13, 2010
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-2788

JAMES E. COPLEY,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Clarksburg. Irene M. Keeley, District

Judge. (CA-95-38-1)

Submitted: May 29, 1997 Decided: June 5, 1997

Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James E. Copley, Appellant Pro Se. Helen Campbell Altmeyer, OFFICE

OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Wheeling, West Virginia, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's orders granting Defendant's motion to dismiss, and denying Appellant's motions for reconsideration and "Motion in Opposition Court Order Dated October

4, 1996 to Dismiss Above Case." We have reviewed the record and the

district court's opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Copley v.

United States Dep't of Energy, No. CA-95-38-1 (N.D.W. Va. Jan. 16,

Oct. 4 & Nov. 5, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 109 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 109

      Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that a 
commemorative postage stamp should be issued recognizing the 4-H Youth 
                   Development Program's centennial.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 11, 1999

Mr. Foley submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
      Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that a 
commemorative postage stamp should be issued recognizing the 4-H Youth 
                   Development Program's centennial.

Whereas the 4-H Youth Development Program celebrates its 100th anniversary in 
        2002;
Whereas the 4-H Youth Development Program has grown to over 5.6 million annual 
        participants, from 5 to 19 years of age;
Whereas today's 4-H Club is very diverse, offering agricultural, career 
        development, information technology, and general life skills programs;
Whereas these programs are offered in rural and urban areas throughout the 
        world; and
Whereas the 4-H Youth Development Program continues to make great contributions 
        toward the development of well-rounded youth: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Representatives 
that--
            (1) the United States Postal Service should make 
        preparations to issue a commemorative postage stamp recognizing 
        the 4-H Youth Development Program's centennial; and
            (2) the Citizens' Stamp Advisory Committee should recommend 
        to the Postmaster General that such a postage stamp be issued 
        in 2002.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 153.2 Application and examination.

The Commissioner of Indian Affairs or his duly authorized representative, upon the application of any unenrolled adult member of the Crow Tribe, shall classify him by placing his name to the competent or incompetent rolls established pursuant to the act of June 4, 1920 (41 Stat. 751), and upon application shall determine whether those persons whose names now or hereafter appear on the incompetent roll shall be reclassified as competent and their names placed on the competent roll.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

# Tracking Santa

By Tech. Sgt. John Gordinier ANR Public Affairs

                JOINT BASE ELMENDORF-RICHARDSON, Alaska  –              http://www.pacaf.af.mil/news/story.asp?id=123374918

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT
From: "Cassidy Mike" <MICHAEL.CASSIDY@kohler.com> 

To: Jeff Telander/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA 

Date: 12/02/2010 03:38 PM 

Subject: Clay MACT ICR Kohler Co. Spartanburg SC Test Report 

Attachments: img-Z021437-0001.pdf

Jeff, 

I received the attached revised pages for the Spartanburg test report from ARI today. Please replace the 

affected pages in the current report with these new pages, and contact me if any questions. 

Michael J. Cassidy 

EHS Specialist 

Kohler Co. 

444 Highland Drive 

Mail Stop 009 

Kohler, WI 53044 

p. (920) 457-4441, x 77263 

f. (920) 459-1682 

mike.cassidy@kohler.com 

Save money. Save water. Support Habitat for Humanity. Visit 

www.SaveWaterAmerica.com
### §1084. Determinations of dependency

A determination of dependency by an administering Secretary under this chapter is conclusive. However, the administering Secretary may change a determination because of new evidence or for other good cause. The Secretary's determination may not be reviewed in any court or by the Comptroller General, unless there has been fraud or gross negligence.

(Added Pub. L. 85–861, §1(25)(B), Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1450; amended Pub. L. 89–614, §2(1), Sept. 30, 1966, 80 Stat. 862; Pub. L. 96–513, title V, §511(34)(A), (36), Dec. 12, 1980, 94 Stat. 2922, 2923; Pub. L. 98–557, §19(11), Oct. 30, 1984, 98 Stat. 2870; Pub. L. 108–375, div. A, title X, §1084(c)(1), Oct. 28, 2004, 118 Stat. 2061.)

| Revised section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1084 | 37:404. | June 7, 1956, ch. 374, §304, 70 Stat. 254. |

The words "the General Accounting Office" are substituted for the words "any accounting officer of the Government" for clarity. The words "All" and "for all purposes" are omitted as surplusage.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 1084, act Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 87, related to administration of former sections 1071 to 1086 of this title, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 85–861, §36B(5), Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1570, as superseded by the Federal Voting Assistance Act of 1955 which is classified to subchapter I–D (§1973cc et seq.) of chapter 20 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare.

#### Amendments

2004—Pub. L. 108–375 substituted "Comptroller General" for "General Accounting Office".

1984—Pub. L. 98–557 substituted reference to administering Secretary for reference to Secretary of Defense and Secretary of Health and Human Services and reference to administering Secretary for reference to he.

1980—Pub. L. 96–513 substituted "Secretary of Health and Human Services" for "Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare", and "this chapter" for "sections 1071–1087 of this title".

1966—Pub. L. 89–614 substituted "1087" for "1085".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1980 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 96–513 effective Dec. 12, 1980, see section 701(b)(3) of Pub. L. 96–513, set out as a note under section 101 of this title.

#### Effective Date of 1966 Amendment

For effective date of amendment by Pub. L. 89–614, see section 3 of Pub. L. 89–614, set out as a note under section 1071 of this title.
#### § 141.45 Consumer credit applications.

Any reservation business offering credit which is not secured by pawn shall provide an application for credit to any customer requesting credit. Within thirty (30) days of the date of application, the lender shall act upon the application and notify the customer in writing of the decision with the reason therefor. A business owner who reduces the amount of credit available to a customer or terminates a credit account shall provide written notice to the customer stating the reason for the reduction or termination of such credit.
#### § 1000.357 May the parties negotiate standards of review for purposes of the trust evaluation?

Yes, unless standards are otherwise provided by Federal treaties, statutes, case law or regulations not waived, the Secretary's designated representative will negotiate standards of review at the request of the Tribe/Consortium.
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm



To the Board of Directors, PNC Financial Services Group, Inc.:



We have examined management’s assertion, included in the accompanying Report
on Assessment of Compliance with Regulation AB Servicing Criteria, that Midland Loan Services, a division of PNC Bank, National
Association (“Midland” or the “Company”) complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d)
of the Securities and Exchange Commission's Regulation AB for all transactions serviced on the Enterprise!Loan Management
System (the “Platform”), as of December 31, 2016 and for the year then ended, excluding criteria 1122(d)(1)(iii), 1122(d)(3)(i)(B),
1122(d)(3)(i)(C), 1122(d)(3)(i)(D), 1122(d)(3)(ii), 1122(d)(3)(iii), 1122(d)(3)(iv), and 1122(d)(4)(xv), which the Company has
determined are not applicable to the servicing activities performed by it with respect to the Platform. Management is responsible
for the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion
based on our examination.



Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards of the Public
Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company’s
compliance with the applicable servicing criteria and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances.
Our examination included testing of selected asset-backed transactions and securities that comprise the Platform, testing of selected
servicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whether the Company processed those selected transactions and performed
those selected activities in compliance with the applicable servicing criteria. Our procedures were limited to the selected transactions
and servicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report. Our procedures were not designed to
detect noncompliance arising from errors that may have occurred prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the
balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report. We believe that our examination
provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company’s compliance
with the servicing criteria.





In our opinion, management’s assertion that Midland complied with the aforementioned
applicable servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2016 for the Platform is fairly stated, in all material
respects.



/ s / Pricewaterhouse Coopers LLP



February 17, 2017

















PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, 1100 Walnut Street, Suite 1300, Kansas City, MO 64106

T: (816) 472 7921, F: (816) 218 1890 www.pwc.com/us