alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

# GW Hosts Japanese Guests for Distinguished Visitor Embark

By Mass Communication Specialist 3rd Class Beverly J. LesonikUSS George Washington Public Affairs

                USS GEORGE WASHINGTON, At Sea  –              

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

pacom

news

articles
Exhibit 32.1








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Pazoo, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, David M. Cunic, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








By:
/s/ David M. CunicChief Executive Officer

April 15, 2016








This certification is made solely for purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, subject to the knowledge standard contained therein, and not for any other purpose.
#### Nils P. Julin *vs.*Fritzof Bowman.

Opinion filed November 15, 1899.

Appeal — Review.

This case involves no question of law.

Appeal from District Court, Cass County; *Pollock,*J.

Action by Nils P. Julin against Fritzof Bowman. Judgment for plaintiff, and he appeals.

Modified.

*W. A. Barnett*and *Morrill & Engerud,*for appellant.

*Pollock & Scott,*for respondent.

Bartholomew, C. J.

This action was brought by a *cestui que*trust to compel an accounting on the part of his trustee. The trusteeship extends over a period of about nine years. The plaintiff is an uneducated Scandinavian, being unable to read or write, and testified through an interpreter. The defendant is his fellow countryman, but can read and write. The trust relation grew out of an honest, well-intended purpose on the part of the defendant to aid plaintiff financially, and enable him to pay off his numerous debts, and save his farm from a mortgage foreclosure sale. The trust covers a large number of transactions, involving the receipt and expenditure of several thousands of dollars. Plaintiff kept no books of accounts or record evidence of the various transactions. Defendant kept a book account, but in an irregular and almost unintelligible manner, so that his books furnish but little aid. Under these circumstances, considering the length of time involved, and that the parties must testify almost entirely from memory, it was to be expected that the testimony of the parties would upon all disputed matters be directly conflicting. The corroborating testimony on neither side furnishes a court much aid in reaching the truth; nor will any court ever be able to say, with any approach to certainty, that it has done justice to these litigants. No question of law is involved. Any discussion of the evidence would be a clear waste of time and space. Judgment was rendered against defendant for a small amount. Plaintiff, claiming that the judgment should be larger, brings the case here, but asks us to review the evidence only as to six items for which the trial court allowed the defendant credit. We have examined all the evidence pertaining to those *88items. As to four of them, our conclusion agrees with that of the trial court; but, as to the item of $100 paid as interest to the Fargo Loan Agency on November 28, 1891, and the item of $73.15 paid to the First National Bank of Fargo as interest on the same date, we are of opinion that the evidence shows that such items were paid from money furnished by plaintiff, and that defendant was not entitled to credit therefor. As a result of this holding, the judgment in favor of plaintiff, which was $78.02 as found by the trial court, must be so modified as to increase the recovery to the sum of $251.17. Judgment will be entered in the District Court accordingly, with costs of both courts in favor of plaintiff. It is so ordered.

(81 N. W. Rep. 51.)

All concur.
**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C.  SECTION 1350**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of General Metals Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended July 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Stephen Parent, the President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1)           the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)           the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Dated: September 21, 2006.

 

/s/ Stephen Parent                                                          

Stephen Parent

President and Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)

 

 

D/JLM/904863.1
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsWind-Tunnel Investigations of Blunt-Body Drag Reduction Using Forebody Surface RoughnessThis paper presents results of wind-tunnel tests that demonstrate a novel drag reduction technique for blunt-based vehicles. For these tests, the forebody roughness of a blunt-based model was modified using micomachined surface overlays. As forebody roughness increases, boundary layer at the model aft thickens and reduces the shearing effect of external flow on the separated flow behind the base region, resulting in reduced base drag. For vehicle configurations with large base drag, existing data predict that a small increment in forebody friction drag will result in a relatively large decrease in base drag. If the added increment in forebody skin drag is optimized with respect to base drag, reducing the total drag of the configuration is possible. The wind-tunnel tests results conclusively demonstrate the existence of a forebody dragbase drag optimal point. The data demonstrate that the base drag coefficient corresponding to the drag minimum lies between 0.225 and 0.275, referenced to the base area. Most importantly, the data show a drag reduction of approximately 15% when the drag optimum is reached. When this drag reduction is scaled to the X-33 base area, drag savings approaching 45,000 N (10,000 lbf) can be realized.Document ID20010014167Acquisition SourceArmstrong Flight Research CenterDocument TypePreprint (Draft being sent to journal)AuthorsWhitmore, Stephen A.*(NASA Dryden Flight Research Center Edwards, CA United States)*Sprague, Stephanie*(Kansas Univ. Lawrence, KS United States)*Naughton, Jonathan W.*(Wyoming Univ. Laramie, WY United States)*Curry, Robert E.Date AcquiredSeptember 7, 2013Publication DateJanuary 1, 2001Subject CategoryAircraft Design, Testing And PerformanceReport/Patent NumberNASA/TM-2001-210390AIAA Paper 2001-0252NAS 1.15:210390H-2439Meeting InformationMeeting: Aerospace SciencesLocation: Reno, NVCountry: United StatesStart Date: January 8, 2001End Date: January 11, 2001Sponsors:American Inst. of Aeronautics and AstronauticsFunding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 718-20-00-E8-53PROJECT: RTOP 529-35-24-M1-00-RRDistribution LimitsPublicCopyrightPublic Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType20010014167.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
Motion Granted; Appeal Dismissed and Mem orandum Opinion filed January

17 , 2019 .

In The



## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14- 18 -01094- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF R.J.N.W. On Appeal from the 309th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2018-17595

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N This is an appeal from an order signed December 12, 2018. On January 4, 2019, appellant, B.O., filed a motion to dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1. The motion is granted, and the appeal is ordered dismissed. PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Wise, Zimmerer, and Spain.
P.O. Box 619119

2929 West Airfield Drive

DFW Airport, Texas

USA 75261-9119

Tel 1-972-456-8000

Fax 1-972-456-8383

www.cae.com

February 2, 2015

Exemption No. 10973

Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2009-1188

U.S. Department of Transportation

Federal Aviation Administration

Flight Standards Service

800 Independence Ave. S.W.

Washington, D.C. 20591

To Whom It May Concern:

CAE SimuFlite, Inc. respectfully requests to cancel its petition for exemption as filed on 25th

November, 2014 ID# FAA-2009-1188-014.

CAE SimuFlite cordially thanks Flight Standards Service for its consideration, should you 

have any questions or require additional information please contact the undersigned for 

immediate response.

Sincerely,

___________________________

Itash Samani, 

Head of FAR Regulations

CAE Regulatory Affairs

Cc: 

Enclosures:
Exhibit 32.1


CERTIFICATION OF CO-CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES‐OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Michael A. Reisner, Co-Chief Executive Officer, in connection with the Annual Report of CĪON Investment Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Annual Report”), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|1. | The Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




|   |                                                                                                                                                            
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|2. | The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







Date: March 15, 2018

















/s/ Michael A. Reisner


Michael A. Reisner


Co-Chief Executive Officer


(Principal Executive Officer)


CĪON Investment Corporation
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Ansel W. Dunham, Appellant.

Judgment affirmed. No opinion. All concurred, except Smith, P) J., not voting, and Sewell, J:, dissenting.
#### §§ 500.112-500.129 [Reserved]
Exhibit 35.2



LOGO

ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE

OF

LNR PARTNERS, LLC

The undersigned, Job Warshaw, being the President of LNR Partners, LLC (the Special Servicer), as special servicer under the
applicable Pooling and Servicing Agreement for the transactions listed on Schedule I hereto, hereby certifies, subject to any limitations listed on Schedule I hereto, as of the date hereof, on behalf of the Special Servicer, solely in
his capacity as an authorized officer of the Special Servicer and not in his individual capacity, as follows:



| | 1. | A review of the activities performed by the Special Servicer during the period commencing on January 1, 2015 and ending on December 31, 2015 (or any other shorter period set forth on Schedule I hereto)
(the Reporting Period), and of the Special Servicers performance under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement has been made under my supervision; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review and using the applicable servicing criteria under Item 1122 of Regulation AB, the Special Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the applicable Pooling
and Servicing Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



LNR PARTNERS, LLC,a Florida limited liability companyBy:

/s/ Job WarshawJob WarshawPresident


Dated: February 23, 2016





1601 Washington Avenue  Suite
700  Miami Beach, Florida 33139-3164

Telephone: (305) 695-5600  Fax: (305) 695-5601



---

Schedule I

CFCRE 2011-C2

CFCRE Commercial Mortgage Trust 2011-C2
Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2011-C2

CCRE Commercial Mortgage Securities, L.P.

Cantor Fitzgerald & Co.

499 Park Avenue, 6th floor

New York NY 10022

Aaron Wessner

CCRE Commercial Mortgage Securities, L.P.

110 East 59th Street

New York NY 10022

Anthony Orso

CCRE Commercial Mortgage Securities, L.P.

499 Park Avenue, 6th
floor

New York NY 10022

Jill A. Weinstein

Citibank, N.A.,

Global Transaction Services

388 Greenwich Street, 14th Floor

New York NY 10013

John Hannon

TriMont Real Estate Advisors, Inc.,

3424 Peachtree Street

NE, Suite 2200

Atlanta GA 30308

J. Gregory Winchester

TriMont Real Estate Advisors, Inc.

McKenna Long &
Albridge LLP

303 Peachtree Street

Suite 5300

Altnata GA 30308

Patrick M McGeeham

U.S. Bank, National Association

Corporation Trust Services

190 S. LaSalle Street, 7th Floor

Mail Station: MK-IL-SL7R

Chicago IL 60603

Nick Xeros
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You havereached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC)Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC.Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's suite ofcataloging and locator services, including the Catalog of U.S. GovernmentPublications (CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in theevent that publications are no longer available from the original publishingagency site. (Historical purposes)

**Title:**Cultural landscape report for Sagamore HillNational Historic Site
Volume1; Volume2

SuDoc:
Item Number:(online)
CGP system Number:
### SUBCHAPTER I—GENERAL PROVISIONS

Sec.
948a.
Definitions.
948b.
Military commissions generally.
948c.
Persons subject to military commissions.
948d.
Jurisdiction of military commissions.
IV

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 105

Recognizing and honoring Joe DiMaggio.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 10, 1999

Mr. RANGEL (for himself, Mr. ACKERMAN, Mr. HINCHEY, Mr. GILMAN, Mr.

HOUGHTON, Mr. LAFALCE, Mr. OWENS, Mr. WEINER, Mr. SERRANO,

Mr. KING, Mr. LAZIO, Mrs. LOWEY, Mr. MCNULTY, Mrs. MALONEY of

New York, Mr. CROWLEY, Mr. TOWNS, Ms. VELA ́ZQUEZ, Mr. BOEHLERT,

Mr. MCHUGH, Mr. FOSSELLA, Mr. REYNOLDS, Mr. QUINN, Mr.

SWEENEY, Mr. NADLER, Mrs. MCCARTHY of New York, Mr. WALSH, Ms.

SLAUGHTER, Mrs. KELLY, Mr. MEEKS of New York, and Mr. ENGEL)

submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee

on Government Reform

RESOLUTION

Recognizing and honoring Joe DiMaggio.

Whereas Joseph Paul (‘‘Joe’’) DiMaggio was born in Martinez, California, on November 25, 1914;

Whereas Joe DiMaggio was the son of Sicilian immigrants,

Joseph Paul and Rosalia DiMaggio, and was the 2nd of

3 brothers to play Major League Baseball;

Whereas Joe DiMaggio played 13 seasons in the major

leagues, all for the New York Yankees;

Whereas Joe DiMaggio, who wore Number 5 in Yankee pinstripes, became a baseball icon in the 1941 season by hit-
2

•HRES 105 IH

ting safely in 56 consecutive games, a major league

record that has stood for more than 5 decades and has

never been seriously challenged;

Whereas Joe DiMaggio compiled a .325 batting average during his storied career and played on 9 World Series

championship teams;

Whereas Joe DiMaggio was selected to the Baseball Hall of

Fame in 1955, 4 years after his retirement, in his 1st

year of eligibility;

Whereas Joe DiMaggio in 1969 was voted Major League

Baseball’s greatest living player;

Whereas Joe DiMaggio served the Nation in World War II

as a member of the Army Air Corps;

Whereas Joe DiMaggio was tireless in helping others and was

devoted to the ‘‘Joe DiMaggio Children’s Hospital’’ in

Hollywood, Florida;

Whereas Joe DiMaggio will be remembered as a role model

for generations of young people; and

Whereas Joe DiMaggio transcended baseball and will remain

a symbol for the ages of talent, commitment, and

achievement: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives recog2 nizes and honors Joe DiMaggio—

3 (1) for his storied baseball career;

4 (2) for his many contributions to the Nation

5 throughout his lifetime; and
3

•HRES 105 IH

1 (3) for transcending baseball and becoming a

2 symbol for the ages of talent, commitment, and

3 achievement.

Æ
1

VonDemHagen, Rebecca

Subject: Call with Richard Maruya: R-443A

Location: CNO

Start: Thu 8/21/2014 1:30 PM

End: Thu 8/21/2014 2:00 PM

Recurrence: (none)

Meeting Status: Meeting organizer

Organizer: VonDemHagen, Rebecca

Required Attendees: Newberg, Cindy; Sheppard, Margaret

Attendees: 

Ed Wuesthoff 

Friedrich Air Conditioning since November, 2007 as a Sustainment Engineering Manager designing refrigeration systems 

for room air conditioners, ptac's, and single vertical packaged terminal units. My main role has been converting all R22 

system designs to R410A, providing assembly procedures for the factory, and developing new suppliers for quality 

improvements. I have a mechanical engineering degree from Franklin University in 1986, and have 3 patents on 

refrigerator designs. My area of experience is in compressor, refrigeration, and component designs for improving energy 

efficiency. 

Gary Whitmyre Risk Assessment 

George Whitmyre Co developer of the safety valve. 

Frank Doyle Engineer retired assisted in writing REFPROP version 9.1 with 

Andrew Tujios Attorney. 

Richard Maruya. Developer of refrigerants R441A and R443A.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-7003

MUHAMMAD EURY,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

RONALD ANGELONE; GENE JOHNSON; DUNCAN MILLS;

GARY BASS,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District

Judge. (CA-01-257-1-2)

Submitted: September 20, 2001 Decided: September 27, 2001

Before LUTTIG, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Muhammad Abd Saleem Eury, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Muhammad Abd Saleem Eury, a state of Virginia inmate, appeals

the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983

(West Supp. 2001) complaint under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915A (West Supp.

2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinion and agree that Eury’s complaint fails to state a claim.

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district

court. See Eury v. Angelone, No. CA-01-257-1-2 (E.D. Va. June 11,

2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED