alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 304.32 Employee standards of conduct. The agency will inform its employees of the provisions of the Privacy Act, including the scope of its restriction against disclosure of records maintained in a system of records without the prior written consent of the individual involved, and the Act's civil liability and criminal penalty provisions. Unless otherwise permitted by law, an employee of the agency will: ( a ) Collect from individuals and maintain only the information that is relevant and necessary to discharge the agency's responsibilities;
( b ) Collect information about an individual directly from that individual to the greatest extent practicable when the information may result in an adverse determination about an individual's rights, benefits, or privileges under Federal programs;
( c ) Inform each individual from whom information is collected of the information set forth in § 304.31(b);
( d ) Ensure that the agency maintains no system of records without public notice and also notify appropriate agency officials of the existence or development of any system of records that is not the subject of a current or planned public notice;
( e ) Maintain all records that are used by it in making any determination about an individual with such accuracy, relevance, timeliness, and completeness as is reasonably necessary to ensure fairness to the individual in the determination;
( f ) Except as to disclosures made to an agency or made under the FOIA, make reasonable efforts, prior to disseminating any record about an individual, to ensure that the record is accurate, relevant, timely, and complete;
( g ) Maintain no record describing how an individual exercises his or her First Amendment rights unless such maintenance is expressly authorized by statute or by the individual about whom the record is maintained or is pertinent to and within the scope of an authorized law enforcement activity;
( h ) When required by the Privacy Act, maintain an accounting in the specified form of all disclosures of records by the agency to persons, organizations, or agencies;
( i ) Maintain and use records with care in order to prevent the unauthorized or inadvertent disclosure of a record to anyone; and
( j ) Notify the appropriate agency official of any record that contains information that the Privacy Act does not permit the agency to maintain.
SOUTHERN UTE INDIAN TRIBE
 

May 18,2011 

Mr. James B. Martin, Regional Administrator 

United States Envirorunental Protection Agency- Region 8 

1595 Wynkoop Street (Mail Code: 8RA) 

Denver, CO 80202-112 

Re:	 Area Designations for the 2010 Revised Sulfur Dioxide National Ambient Air 

Quality Standards 

Dear Mr. Martin, 

Thank you for providing the opportunity for the Southern Ute Indian Tribe ("Tribe") to 

participate in the establishment of area designations for the 2010 revised sulfur dioxide ("SO/') National 

Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS). The Tribe understands that under § 107(d)( 1)(A) of the Clean 

Air Act, areas may be designated as "nonattairunent" (areas that either do not meet the standard, or are 

contributing to a nearby area that does not meet the standard), "attairunent" (areas that meet the standard), 

or "unclassifiable" (areas where there is insufficient information to make a determination). 

The Southern Ute Indian Tribe respectfully recommends the EPA to designate the lands within 

the exterior boundaries of the Southern Ute Indian Reservation as "unclassifiable" for the 2010 revised 

S02 NAAQS. The Tribe's Air Quality Program maintains the only two ambient air quality monitoring 

stations operating within the exterior boundaries of the Reservation. The Tribe does not monitor for S02 

but continues to monitor for four other criteria pollutants, which includes nitrogen dioxide (N02), ozone 

(03), fine particulate matter (PM2.5), and carbon monoxide (CO), all of which are meeting the current 

NAAQS. Also, there are no large sources of S02 emissions within the Reservation. Therefore, there is 

insufficient information to make an area designation other than "unclassifiable" for the 2010 revised S02 

NAAQS within the exterior boundaries of the Southern Ute Indian Reservation. 

Please contact Mr. Thomas Johnson (Envirorunental Programs Division Head) at (970)563-0135 

or Mrs. Brenda Jarrell (Air Quality Program Manager) at (970)563-4705 if you have any questions 

regarding the Tribe's recommendation. 

RECEIVED 

U.S. EPA Region 8 

RA'sOfflce 

Sir~lY, JUN 08 2011 

;C:d ? &-<u~

Pearl E. Casias, Chairman
 

Southern Ute Indian Tribe
 

P.O. Box 737" IGNACIO, CO 81137" PHONE: 970-563-0100
#### The STATE OF MONTANA on the relation of AILI E. DAVIS, Executrix of the Estate of George V. Davis, Deceased, Relator, *v.*The DISTRICT COURT OF the THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT of the State of Montana, IN AND FOR the COUNTY OF POWELL, and the Honorable ROBERT J. BOYD, Presiding District Judge, Respondents.

No. 13650.

Feb. 25, 1977.

561 P.2d 912.

Michael J. Hughes, David J. Sullivan, Helena, for relator.

C. W. Leaphart, Helena, for respondents.

*140ORDER

PER CURIAM:

The application for a writ of supervisory control to review and reverse the district court’s denial of summary judgment to the relator, and the granting by the district court of plaintiffs’ motion to strike the defenses of res judicata, statute of limitations, and statute of frauds, as legally insufficient was considered by the Court and an adversary hearing was scheduled and had on February 9, 1977, at 9:30 a.m. Briefs were submitted.

The case involves an action for breach of alleged oral contracts by which the decedent, George Davis, allegedly agreed to devise to plaintiffs certain ranches in exchange for plaintiffs’ services as managers of George Davis’ ranch properties. The defendant, herein is Aili E. Davis, the executrix of the Will and Estate of George V. Davis, deceased. The case is before this Court on defendant relator’s application for a writ of supervisory control by which relator contends that the district court erred in refusing to grant her motion for summary judgment on the grounds that plaintiffs’ claims to George Davis’ ranches are barred by res judicata and the statute of limitations and because the alleged oral contracts to devise are invalid under the statute of frauds. In addition, the relator contends that the district court erred in granting plaintiffs’ motion to strike the defenses of res judicata, statute of limitations, and statute of frauds as legally insufficient.

As to the issue of summary judgment reference is made to the opinion in *State of Montana ex rel., Bruce A. Kosena, d/b/a The Pub, Relator, vs. The District Court of the First Judicial District of the State of Montana,*in and for the County of Lewis and Clark, The Honorable Arnold Olsen, Judge presiding, Respondents, No. 13700, decided February 22, 1977, which in effect states that an order denying summary judgment is interrogatory in character and not res judicata and subject to later review by the trial court if circumstances warrant.

*141Therefore, the relief sought as to the summary judgment ruling is denied, however, the trial court’s order of May 21, 1976 striking the defenses is overruled and said defenses are reinstated.

Accordingly, we vacate that portion of the district court order striking the defenses dated May 21, 1976. This cause is remanded to the district court for further proceedings not inconsistent herewith.
§ 1000.165 Are provisions in compacts negotiated before January 16, 2001, effective after implementation? ( a ) Yes, all provisions in compacts that were negotiated with BIA before January 16, 2001, shall remain in effect for BIA programs only after January 16, 2001, provided that each compact contains provisions: ( 1 ) That are authorized by the Tribal Self-Governance Act of 1994;
( 2 ) Are in compliance with other applicable Federal laws; and,
( 3 ) Are consistent with this part.
( b ) BIA will notify the Tribe/Consortium in writing when BIA asserts that a provision or provisions of that Tribe's/Consortium's previously negotiated compact is not in compliance with the terms and conditions of this part. BIA and the Tribe/Consortium will renegotiate the provision within 60 days of the Tribe's/Consortium's receipt of the notification.
( c ) If renegotiation is not successful within 60 days of the notice being provided, BIA's determination is final for the bureau and enforceability of the provisions shall be subject to the appeals process described in subpart R of this part. Pending a final appeal through the appeals process, BIA's determination shall be stayed.
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Clay B. Siegall,
certify that:



|1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of Seattle Genetics, Inc.; and
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: September 15, 2017



|                                                                     
|---------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Clay B. Siegall                                                  
|Clay B. Siegall
Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

# Chairman in Hawaii For Trilateral Talks

By Jim GaramoneAmerican Forces Press Service

                ABOARD A U.S. MILITARY AIRCRAFT  –              
Army Gen. Martin E. Dempsey will meet with South Korean Navy Adm. Choi Yun-hee and Japanese Air Defense Force Gen. Shigeru Iwasaki. 

The chairman will also meet with U.S. Pacific Command’s commander, Navy Adm. Samuel J. Locklear, and the U.S. commander in Korea, Army Gen. Curtis M. Scaparrotti, as well as component commanders. 

He will also speak at the Honolulu International Forum. 

In addition to furthering military-to-military contacts among the United States, Japan and South Korea, the chairman will also receive briefings about the Rim of the Pacific exercise. 

RIMPAC is one of the largest U.S. military exercises and his held every two years. This year’s iteration began June 26 and will run through Aug. 1. A total of 22 nations, 49 surface ships, six submarines, more than 200 aircraft and 25,000 personnel will participate. 

Units from Australia, Brunei, Canada, Chile, Colombia, France, India, Indonesia, Japan, Malaysia, Mexico, Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, the People’s Republic of China, Peru, the Republic of Korea, the Republic of the Philippines, Singapore, Tonga, the United Kingdom and the United States will participate.

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

pacom

news

articles
#### § 3.1 Information services.

Except in cases where the time required would be excessive, information concerning the publications described in § 2.5 of this chapter and the original acts and documents filed with the Office of the Federal Register is provided by the staff of that Office. However, the staff may not summarize or interpret substantive text of any act or document.
# C_2013228EN.01000201.xml

| 7.8.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 228/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.8.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 228/2

---

Communication from the Commission concerning the quantity not applied for to be added to the quantity fixed for the subperiod 1 October to 31 December 2013 under certain quotas opened by the European Union for pigmeat products

2013/C 228/02

Commission Regulation (EC) No 442/2009 (1) opened tariff quotas for imports of pigmeat products. The applications for import licences lodged during the first seven days of June 2013 for the subperiod 1 July to 30 September 2013 are, for quotas 09.4038, 09.4170 and 09.4204, for quantities smaller than those available. Pursuant to the second sentence of Article 7(4) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1301/2006 (2), the quantities not applied for are to be added to the quantity fixed for the following quota subperiod, from 1 October to 31 December 2013; they are set out in the Annex to this communication.

1

2

---

(1)  OJ L 129, 28.5.2009, p. 13.

1

(2)  OJ L 238, 1.9.2006, p. 13.

2

---

ANNEX

| Quota order number | Quantities not applied for, to be added to the quantity fixed for the subperiod 1 October to 31 December 2013
  (in kg) |
| --- | --- |
| 09.4038 | 8 536 250 |
| 09.4170 | 1 230 500 |
| 09.4204 | 1 156 000 |

Quota order number

Quantities not applied for, to be added to the quantity fixed for the subperiod 1 October to 31 December 2013

(in kg)

09.4038

8 536 250

09.4170

1 230 500

09.4204

1 156 000

---
In The 

Court of Appeals 

Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo 

 

No. 07-21-00107-CV 

 

CASEY GLYNN DOBBS, APPELLANT 

V. 

RACHEL MEDIA ANN MILLER, APPELLEE 

On Appeal from the County Court 

 Oldham County, Texas 

Trial Court No. 771, Honorable David L. Gleason, Presiding 

June 15, 2021 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

Before QUINN, C.J., and PARKER and DOSS, JJ. 

Appellant Casey Glynn Dobbs, a Texas inmate proceeding pro se, filed a notice of 

appeal from the trial court’s Order of Dismissal without paying the required filing fee.1 By 

letter of May 14, 2021, we directed Dobbs to pay the filing fee or, in lieu thereof, to comply 

1 Dobbs filed a notice of appeal within fifteen days after the notice of appeal deadline. By letter of 

May 17, 2021, we notified Dobbs that a motion for an extension of time was implied and directed him to 

provide a reasonable explanation for his late notice. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.3, 10.5(b); Verburgt v. Dorner, 

959 S.W.2d 615, 617 (Tex. 1997); Jones v. City of Houston, 976 S.W.2d 676, 677 (Tex. 1998). Because 

Dobbs has filed a response reasonably explaining the delay, an extension of time to file the late notice of 

appeal is granted.
2

with chapter 14 of the Civil Practice and Remedies Code by filing 1) an affidavit of 

indigence, 2) an affidavit relating to previous filings, and 3) a certified copy of his inmate 

trust account statement. See TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE ANN. §§ 14.002(a), 14.004 

(West 2017). We advised Dobbs that this appeal was subject to dismissal if he did not 

comply by May 24, 2021. Dobbs has filed an affidavit of indigence but has not filed an 

affidavit describing his previous filings or a certified copy of his inmate trust account 

statement to date.

The requirement to pay the filing fee or tender an affidavit of indigence, an affidavit 

of previous filings, and a certified copy of an inmate trust account statement is mandatory, 

and the lack thereof is grounds for dismissal of an appeal or original proceeding. See In 

re Denson, No. 07-20-00191-CV, 2020 Tex. App. LEXIS 6966, at *1 (Tex. App.—Amarillo 

Aug. 27, 2020, orig. proceeding) (per curiam) (mem. op.). Because Dobbs has failed to 

pay the filing fee or comply with all the requirements of chapter 14 of the Civil Practice 

and Remedies Code within the time provided for compliance, we dismiss his appeal.

Per Curiam
Exhibit
10.1


 


November
2, 2021


 


INVO
Bioscience Inc.


407 R. Mystic Ave


Suite 34C


Medford,
MA 02155


Attention: Mr. Steve Shum


 


Bio
X Cell, Inc.


407 R. Mystic Ave


Suite 34C


Medford,
MA 02155


Attention: Mr. Steve Shum


 


Re:
Notice of Termination


 


Dear Mr. Shum,


 


Ferring
International Center S.A. (“Ferring”), INVO Bioscience, Inc. (“Invo”), and Bio X Cell, Inc., are
parties to a distribution agreement dated November 12, 2018 (the “Agreement”). Capitalized terms used in this letter
but not defined have the meanings given to them in the Agreement.


 


As
discussed with you and Bipin Dalmia and David Powley, this notice shall serve as our notice of termination for convenience pursuant to
Section 14.2(b) of the Agreement. The effective date of termination/expiration of the Term shall be ninety (90) days from the date of
this notice – January 31, 2022.


 


Bipin,
David and potentially other members of our Ferring team will be in touch separately to coordinate further discussions and transition
activities with you and your team.


 


Regards,


 


 /s/
Curt McDaniel 


  


 



  


Curt
McDaniel


Chief
Legal Officer


Ferring
International Center S.A.


 


Copy
to:


Shulman
Rogers


12505
Park Potomac Avenue


6th Floor


Potomac,
MD 20854


Attn: Scott Museles
In the matter of: 

PLEADING FORM 

CIVIL PENALTY COMPLAINT 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION 

FAA Docket No. F AA-20 15-0634 

Case No. 2014NM720059 

IXL Premium Lubricants, Inc. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

JUDGE RICHARD C. GOODWIN 

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE 

1 3 2015 

Pursuant to 14 C.F.R. § 13.204(a), Glenn H. Brown, 222 W 7th Ave Box 14, Anchorage, 

AK 99513; telephone: 907-271-5271; hereby gives notice of his appearance in this matter for 

Complainant Federal Aviation Administration. 

All future pleadings in this matter must be served on him and not the previously assigned 

attorney, Jeffrey M. Harper. 

Dated this 5th day of November 2015. 

Peter J. Lynch 

Assistant Chief Counsel 

for Enforcement 

C}nc<, By:~\~ Glenn H. Brown 

Enforcement Division, Western Team 

222 W 7th Avenue Box 14 

Anchorage, AK 99513-7587 

email: glenn.brown@faa.gov 

telephone: (907) 271-5271 (direct) 

(907) 271-2800 (fax) 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

Re: IXL Premium Lubricants, Inc. 

FDMS No. FAA-2015-0634 

I hereby certify that on this date I have served a copy of the foregoing Notice of Appearance by 

postage-prepaid, certified mail, return receipt requested and facsimile transmission to the 

following: 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin 

U.S. Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

US Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

Fax: 202-366-7536 

Jordan Olsen 

IXL Premium Lubricants, Inc. 

2719 North 1600 West 

Pleasant View, UT 84404 

Fax: 801-731-4499 

I further certify that on this date I have served the original and one copy ofthe foregoing Notice 

of Appearance by postage-prepaid, certified mail, return receipt requested and facsimile, 

addressed as follows: 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

ATTN: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl 000 

Fax: (202) 493-5020 

DATED: I 

) 

Federal Aviation Administration 

Office ofRegional Counsel 

222 West 7th Avenue, Box 14, 

Anchorage, Alaska 99513-7587 

2
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 911

To designate the Federal building located at 310 New Bern Avenue in

Raleigh, North Carolina, as the ‘‘Terry Sanford Federal Building’’.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 2, 1999

Mr. ETHERIDGE (for himself, Mr. COBLE, Mr. PRICE of North Carolina, Mrs.

CLAYTON, Mr. HAYES, Mr. WATT of North Carolina, Mr. BURR of North

Carolina, Mr. TAYLOR of North Carolina, Mr. MCINTYRE, Mr. JONES of

North Carolina, Mr. BALLENGER, and Mrs. MYRICK) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and

Infrastructure

A BILL

To designate the Federal building located at 310 New Bern

Avenue in Raleigh, North Carolina, as the ‘‘Terry Sanford Federal Building’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Terry Sanford Com5 memoration Act of 1999’’.

6 SEC. 2. FINDINGS.

7 Congress makes the following findings:
2

•HR 911 IH

1 (1) Terry Sanford served the State of North

2 Carolina and the Nation with enthusiasm, bravery,

3 and distinction in many important ways, including—

4 (A) as a paratrooper in World War II;

5 (B) as an agent with the Federal Bureau

6 of Investigation;

7 (C) as a North Carolina State senator;

8 (D) as Governor of North Carolina;

9 (E) as a professor of public policy at Duke

10 University;

11 (F) as President of Duke University;

12 (G) as a United States Senator from

13 North Carolina;

14 (H) as a patron of the arts; and

15 (I) as a loving and committed husband and

16 father.

17 (2) Terry Sanford fought tirelessly and self18 lessly throughout his life to improve the lives of his

19 fellow citizens through public education, racial heal20 ing, economic development, eradication of poverty,

21 and promotion of the arts.

22 (3) Terry Sanford exemplified the best qualities

23 mankind has to offer.

24 (4) Terry Sanford lived an exemplary life and

25 is owed a debt of gratitude for his untiring service
3

•HR 911 IH

1 to the State of North Carolina and his fellow Ameri2 cans.

3 SEC. 3. DESIGNATION.

4 The Federal building located at 310 New Bern Ave5 nue in Raleigh, North Carolina, shall be known and des6 ignated as the ‘‘Terry Sanford Federal Building’’.

7 SEC. 4. REFERENCES.

8 Any reference in law, map, regulation, document,

9 paper, or other record of the United States to the Federal

10 building referred to in section 3 shall be deemed to be

11 a reference to the ‘‘Terry Sanford Federal Building’’.

Æ
1 

### VonDemHagen, Rebecca Subject: Call with Richard Maruya: R-443A Location: CNO
Start: Thu 8/21/2014 1:30 PM End: Thu 8/21/2014 2:00 PM
Recurrence: (none) Meeting Status: Meeting organizer Organizer: VonDemHagen, Rebecca Required Attendees: Newberg, Cindy; Sheppard, Margaret

Attendees: Ed Wuesthoff Friedrich Air Conditioning since November, 2007 as a Sust ainment Engineering Manager designing refrigeration systems for room air conditioners, ptac's, and single vertical packag ed terminal units. My main role has been converting all R22 system designs to R410A, providing assembly procedures for the factory, and developing new suppliers for quality improvements. I have a mechanical engineering degree fr om Franklin University in 1986, and have 3 patents on refrigerator designs. My area of experience is in compre ssor, refrigeration, and component designs for improving energy efficiency. Gary Whitmyre Risk Assessment
George Whitmyre Co developer of the safety valve. Frank Doyle Engineer retired as sisted in writing REFPROP version 9.1 with Andrew Tujios Attorney. Richard Maruya. Developer of refrigerants R441A and R443A.