alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 10** 
**- 1718** 

ZHAO WEN CHEN ,
Petitioner ,

v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, JR. , Attorney General,
Respondent

.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

.

Submitted : November 16, 2011 Decided: December 13, 2011

Before KING, AGEE, and DIAZ , Circuit Judges.

Petition denied in part and dismissed in part by un published per curiam opinion

.

Michael Brown, New York, New York, for Petitioner. Tony West, A ssistant Attorney General, William C. Peachey, Assistant Director, Paul T. Cygnarowicz, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circui t.2 PER CURIAM:
Zhao Wen Chen, a native and citizen of China,
petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration
Appeals (Board) denying his motions to reconsider and reopen.

We have reviewed the administrative record and Chen’s claims and

co nclude that the Board did not abuse its discreti on in denying
Chen’s motion to reopen his asylum claim

. See 8 C.F.R.

§ 1003.2(a), (c) (2011). We accordingly deny the petition for
review in part for the reasons stated by the Board. See In re:

Chen (B.I.A . June 2, 2010). We dismiss the petition for review
in part for lack of jurisdiction with respect t o Chen’s
challenge to the Board ’s denial of his motion to reopen and

reconsider his claim for cancellation of removal. See 8 U.S.C.
§ 1252(a)(2)(B)(i) (200 6) . Finally, we dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED IN PART AND DISMISSED IN PART
#### § 141.36 Maximum finance charges on pawn transactions.

No pawnbroker may impose an annual finance charge greater than twenty-four percent (24 percent) of the unpaid balance for the period of the loan nor assess late charges or delinquency charges on any loan.
# Fourth Court **of Appeals**

**San Antonio, Texas**

February 18, 2021

04

- 19

- 00212

- CR

Sean Leroy HAYS

, Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

, Appellee

From the 25th Judicial District Court

, Guadalupe County, Texas

Trial Court No. 17

- 0232

- CR

- A

Honorable William D. Old III , J udge Presiding



### ORDER

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion (not participating)

Luz Elena D. Ch a pa

Beth Watkins

On November 4. 2020, this court issued an opinion affirming the trial court’s judgment in

appellant’s underlying criminal case. On February 1, 2021, appellant filed a pro se “Motion for

New Trial.” The motion is DENIED.

_________________________________ Lori I. Valenzuela , Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixe d the seal of the said

court on this 18th day of February, 2021

.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ

, Clerk of Court
## PART IV—TRAINING FOR RESERVE COMPONENTS AND EDUCATIONAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAMS

Chap.
Sec.
1601.
Training Generally. [No present sections]
1606.
Educational Assistance for Members of the Selected Reserve
16131
1607.
Educational Assistance for Reserve Component Members Supporting Contingency Operations and Certain Other Operations
16161
1608.
Health Professions Stipend Program
16201
1609.
Education Loan Repayment Programs
16301
1611.
Other Educational Assistance Programs
16401

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**2004**—Pub. L. 108–375, div. A, title V, §527(c), Oct. 28, 2004, 118 Stat. 1894, added item for chapter 1607.

**1999**—Pub. L. 106–65, div. A, title V, §551(a)(2), Oct. 5, 1999, 113 Stat. 614, added item for chapter 1611.

**1996**—Pub. L. 104–106, div. A, title XV, §1501(b)(1), Feb. 10, 1996, 110 Stat. 495, substituted "Repayment Programs" for "Repayments" in item for chapter 1609.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# U.S. and Japan Conduct Bilateral Exercise

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command Public Affairs

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

JOSE LUIS DIAZ, M.D., 

INDIVIDUALLY AND D/B/A JOSE 

LUIS DIAZ, M.D., P.A.,

 Appellant,

v.

JOSIE GARMON,

 Appellee.

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-12-00084-CV

Appeal from the

448th Judicial District Court

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC# 2008-1183)

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Pending before the Court is the joint motion of Appellant, Jose Luis Diaz, M.D., and 

Appellee, Josie Garmon, to dismiss this appeal pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 

42.1, because they have settled all claims and issues between them. See TEX. R. APP. P.

42.1(a)(2). We grant the motion and dismiss the appeal without prejudice. Pursuant to the 

parties’ agreement, the parties shall bear their own costs. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(d).

May 15, 2013 GUADALUPE RIVERA, Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rivera, and Rodriguez, JJ.
`[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 916 Reported in House (RH)]






                                                       Calendar No. 101
106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 916

                          [Report No. 106-181]

 To make technical amendments to section 10 of title 9, United States 
                                 Code.


_______________________________________________________________________


                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 2, 1999

  Mr. Gekas introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

                             June 10, 1999

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 
                       and ordered to be printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL


 
 To make technical amendments to section 10 of title 9, United States 
                                 Code.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. VACATION OF AWARDS.

    Section 10 of title 9, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) by indenting the margin of paragraphs (1) through (4) 
        of subsection (a) 2 ems;
            (2) by striking ``Where'' in such paragraphs and inserting 
        ``where'';
            (3) by striking the period at the end of paragraphs (1), 
        (2), and (3) of subsection (a) and inserting a semicolon and by 
        adding ``or'' at the end of paragraph (3);
            (4) by redesignating subsection (b) as subsection (c); and
            (5) in paragraph (5), by striking ``Where an award'' and 
        inserting ``If an award'', by inserting a comma after 
        ``expired'', and by redesignating the paragraph as subsection 
        (b).
                                     





                                                       Calendar No. 101

106th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 916

                          [Report No. 106-181]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 To make technical amendments to section 10 of title 9, United States 
                                 Code.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             June 10, 1999

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 
                       and ordered to be printed`
§ 1001.7 Availability, amount, and number of planning and negotiation grants. ( a ) What is the purpose of this section? This section describes how to apply for planning and negotiation grants authorized by section 402(d) of the Act to help meet tribal costs incurred: ( 1 ) In meeting the planning phase requirement of Pub. L. 103-413, including planning to negotiate non-BIA programs, services, functions and activities; and
( 2 ) In conducting negotiations.
( b ) What types of grants are available? Three categories of grants may be available: ( 1 ) Negotiation grants for tribes/consortia selected from the applicant pool as described in § 1001.5 of these regulations;
( 2 ) Planning grants for tribes/consortia requiring advance funding to meet the planning phase requirement of Pub. L. 103-413; and
( 3 ) Financial assistance for tribes/consortia to plan for negotiating for non-BIA programs, services, functions and activities, as described in § 1001.10.
( c ) Will grants always be made available to meet the planning phase requirement as described in section 402(d) of Pub. L. 103-413? No. Grants to cover some or all of the planning costs that a tribe/consortium may incur may be made available depending upon the availability of funds appropriated by Congress. We will publish notice of availability of grants in the Federal Register as described in this section.
( d ) May a tribe use its own resources to meet its planning and negotiation expenses in preparation for entering into self-governance? Yes. A tribe/consortium may use its own resources to meet these costs. Receiving a grant is not necessary to meet the planning phase requirement of the Act or to negotiate a compact and annual funding agreement.
( e ) What happens if there are insufficient funds to meet the anticipated tribal requests for planning and negotiation grants in any given year? If appropriated funds are available but insufficient to meet the total requests from tribes/consortia, we will give first priority to those that have been selected from the applicant pool to negotiate an annual funding agreement. We will give second priority to tribes/consortia that require advance funds to meet the planning requirement for entry into the self-governance program. We will give third priority to tribes/consortia that require negotiation/planning funds to negotiate for DOI non-BIA programs.
( f ) How many grants will the Department make each year and what funding will be available? The number and size of grants awarded each year will depend on Congressional appropriations and tribal interest. Each year, we will publish a notice in the Federal Register which provides relevant details about the application process, including: The funds available, timeframes, and requirements for negotiation and advance planning specified in this part.
[61 FR 17831, Apr. 23, 1996]
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

# Army Watercraft Prove Ability, Benefit of Enduring Presence in Pacific 

By Sgt. 1st Class Mary FergusonU.S. Army

                OKINAWA, Japan  –              
This article was originally published at: Army Watercraft Prove Ability, Benefit of Enduring Presence in Pacific

- PACOM: (posted May 21, 2014) - 

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

pacom

news

articles
EX-33.6
(logo) WELLS FARGO

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Document Custody
1015 10th Avenue Southeast
Minneapolis, MN 55414


ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH THE APPLICABLE SERVICING CRITERIA


Management of the Document Custody Section of the Corporate Trust Services
division of Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (the "Company") is
responsible for assessing compliance with the servicing criteria set forth in
Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB of the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Management has determined that the servicing criteria are applicable in regard
to the servicing platform for the period as follows:

Platform:
Publicly-issued (i.e., transaction-level reporting required under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) residential mortgage-backed
securities and commercial mortgage-backed securities issued on or after January
1, 2006 for which the Company provides document custody services, excluding any
such securities issued by any agency or instrumentality of the U.S. government
(other than the Federal Deposit Insurance Company) or any government sponsored
entity (the "Platform").


Period:  As of and for the twelve months ended December 31, 2012 (the "Period").

Applicable Servicing Criteria:

The servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d)(1)(iv), 1122(d)(4)(i) and
1122(d)(4)(ii), in regard to the activities performed by the Company with
respect to the Platform (the "Applicable Servicing Criteria"). Management of
the Company has determined that all other servicing criteria set forth in Item
1122(d) are not applicable to the Platform.


With respect to the Platform and the Period, the Company's management provides
the following assertion of compliance with respect to the Applicable Servicing
Criteria:

1. The Company's management is responsible for assessing the Company compliance
with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.

2. The Company management has assessed the Company compliance with the
Applicable Servicing Criteria. In performing this assessment, management used
the criteria set forth by the Securities and Exchange Commission in paragraph
(d) of Item 1122 of Regulation AB.

3. Based on such assessment as of and for the Period, the Company has complied,
in all material respects with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.

KPMG LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, has issued an
attestation report with respect to management's assertion of compliance with the
Applicable Servicing Criteria as of and for the Period.


WELLS FARGO BANK, National Association

By:    /s/ Shari Gillund
       Shari L. Gillund

Title: Senior Vice President

Dated: February 15, 2013


Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
GeraldC.Mann

Attorney

General

Honorable John R. Shook Criminal District Attorney SanAntonio, Texas Dear Sir: Attention: Abe SanMiguel Opinion No. O-3827 Re: Duty of the county clerk with reference to accepting and recording deeds with certain restrcitive clauses. We quote as follows fromyour recent letter requesting a legal opinion from this department:

"The Consul General of Mexico has asked us to secure an opinion fromyou concerning the legality of restrictive clauses contained indeeds whereby the sale of real estate in the State of Texas to Mexicans and thepossession thereof byMexicans are prohibited.

"If such a clause asquoted above is illegal inbeing contrary topublic policy, would the County Clerk be justified in refusing to records an instrument containing such a restriction?" We have concluded that itwould be improper for this department towrite upon the first question involving the legality of certain restrictive clauses in deeds. This matter is peculiarly one ofprivate rights. We have consistently deemed it our duty, under the statutes, to refrain fromwriting upon such questions.

This is accentuated by the necessary answer toyour second question. It is the duty of the county clerk to recordHonorable John R. Shook, Page 2

such deeds irrespective of the legality or illegality of the restrictive clauses mentioned.

It iswell settled that it is the duty of the county clerk to accept for recordation onstruments delivered to him for such purpose which have been acknowledged or approved according to law. Articles 6626 and 6631; 36Tex. Jur. 417. Itwas early declared in the case of Brockenbourough v. Melton, 55Tex. 493, that:

"The clerk of the county court was required to record all instruments ofwriting authorized and required to be recorded." In First National Bank v. McElroy, the court declared that:

"The duties of a recording officer ministerial." 112 S.W. 801, 804,

are

The county clerk may be compelled bymandamus to record such instruments. In Hollis v. Parkland Corp., 40 S.W. (2d)53, this was done, the Commission ofAppeals pointing out:

"Theplat appears to be duly acknowledged as required by law, and bears the approval of the city planning commissioner. This is all that theAct calls for as aprerequisite to the recording of the plat in the office of the county clerk. * * *." Moreover the clerk is liable for apenalty or for damages ifhe fails topreform his statutory duties with respect to the recording of instruments delivered to him for suchpurpose. SeeArticle 6652; Carlisle and CO. v. King, 133 S.W. 241: 36 Tex. Jur. 426, Para. 24.

It is therefore the duty of the county clerk to accept deeds for recordation containing the restrictive clauses described inyour letter notwithstanding any questions which might arise appertaining to their legality. Yours very truly Approved

Aug.15,1941 ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS /s/GeraldC.Mann ArrImmYm OFTEXAS zcs:Rs By /s/ZollieC.Steaklay Zollie C. Steakley

Assistant

Approved:Opinion

Catmittee By:BWB,Chai=
SS DS SS DS SS DS1 1,628.60$ 2,666.69$802.29$1,267.58$─ ─2 2,000.46$ 3,183.65$1,174.15$1,784.54$─ ─3─ ─1,924.46$2,575.69$─ ─4─ ─1,924.46$2,575.69$ 924.30$ 972.32$5────1,494.39$ 1,912.89$6────3,231.19$ 3,703.23$7────3,386.83$ 3,967.35$8────3,386.83$ 3,967.35$

IECC Climate ZonesFromCurrentHUDMHCSStoIECC2015:ImpactonFirstCost($)HUDThermalZones123
#### § 162.206 Can the terms of an agricultural lease be negotiated with the Indian landowners?

An agricultural lease may be obtained through negotiation. We will assist prospective tenants in contacting the Indian landowners or their representatives for the purpose of negotiating a lease, and we will assist the landowners in those negotiations upon request.
#### § 1000.317 Is a Tribe's/Consortium's general right to negotiate an AFA adversely affected by a reassumption action?

A reassumption action taken by the Secretary does not affect the Tribe's/Consortium's ability to negotiate an AFA for programs not affected by the reassumption.
#### § 1000.271 What other statutes and regulations apply to FTCA coverage?

A number of other statutes and regulations apply to FTCA coverage, including the Federal Tort Claims Act (28 U.S.C. 1346(b), 2401, 2671-2680) and related Department of Justice regulations in 28 CFR part 14.
#### § 21.53 Nonstatutory materials.

Nonstatutory documents shall be cited by document designation and by Federal Register volume and page, followed, if possible, by the parallel citation to the Code of Federal Regulations. For example:

#### Authority:

Special Civil Air Reg. SR-422A, 28 FR 6703, 14 CFR part 4b. E.O. 11130, 28 FR 12789; 3 CFR 1959-1963 Comp.

[37 FR 23611, Nov. 4, 1972, as amended at 54 FR 9683, Mar. 7, 1989]
EXHIBIT 32


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, the
undersigned officer of Silverwood Acquisition Corporation
 (the "Company"), hereby certify to my knowledge that:

The Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2011 of the Company fully complies, in all material respects,
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the
Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by
the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.


                             /s/ James Cassidy
                                 Chief Executive Officer
                                 Chief Financial Officer
Date: March 28, 2012