alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2013031EN.01001301.xml

| 2.2.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 31/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.2.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 31/13

---

Commission information notice pursuant to Article 16(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community

Changes to public service obligations in respect of scheduled air services

(Text with EEA relevance)

2013/C 31/13

| Member State | France |
| --- | --- |
| Routes concerned | Strasbourg–Amsterdam
  Strasbourg–Madrid
  Strasbourg–Prague |
| Original date of entry into force of the public service obligations | 28 March 2010 |
| Date of entry into force of the changes | 1 August 2013 |
| Address where the text and any relevant information and/or documentation relating to the public service obligation can be obtained | Decree of 8 January 2013 amending the public service obligations imposed on scheduled air services between Strasbourg and Amsterdam
  (NOR: DEVA1242835A)
  Decree of 8 January 2013 amending the public service obligations imposed on scheduled air services between Strasbourg and Madrid
  (NOR: DEVA1242837A)
  Decree of 8 January 2013 amending the public service obligations imposed on scheduled air services between Strasbourg and Prague
  (NOR: DEVA1242836A)
  http://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/initRechTexte.do
  For further information, please contact:





  Direction générale de l'aviation civile |
| DTA/SDT/T2 |
| 50 rue Henry Farman |
| 75720 Paris Cedex 15 |
| FRANCE |
| Tel. +33 158094321 |
| E-mail: osp-compagnies.dta@aviation-civile.gouv.fr |

Member State

France

Routes concerned

Strasbourg–Amsterdam

Strasbourg–Madrid

Strasbourg–Prague

Original date of entry into force of the public service obligations

28 March 2010

Date of entry into force of the changes

1 August 2013

Address where the text and any relevant information and/or documentation relating to the public service obligation can be obtained

Decree of 8 January 2013 amending the public service obligations imposed on scheduled air services between Strasbourg and Amsterdam

(NOR: DEVA1242835A)

Decree of 8 January 2013 amending the public service obligations imposed on scheduled air services between Strasbourg and Madrid

(NOR: DEVA1242837A)

Decree of 8 January 2013 amending the public service obligations imposed on scheduled air services between Strasbourg and Prague

(NOR: DEVA1242836A)

http://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/initRechTexte.do

For further information, please contact:

Direction générale de l'aviation civile

DTA/SDT/T2

50 rue Henry Farman

75720 Paris Cedex 15

FRANCE

Tel. +33 158094321

E-mail: osp-compagnies.dta@aviation-civile.gouv.fr

---
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

**JERMAINE TERRELL MILLER, AGGRIEVED PARTY,** 

**Petitioner**

**v.**

**COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, 39TH**
**DISTRICT-FRANKLIN,**

**Respondent :** 

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**: No. 157 MM 2014** 

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 21 st**  **day of November, 2014, the Application for Leave to File** 

**Original Process is** GRANTED **, and the Petition for Writ of Mandamus is** DENIED

**.**
#### § 10.3 Who must follow these policies and standards?

You must follow these minimum policies, standards, and guides if you are part of the BIA or tribal detention or rehabilitation program receiving Federal funding. Self-governance tribes and tribes with limited jurisdiction are encouraged to follow the regulations in this part, and other BIA manuals and handbooks. Detention officers, guards, cooks and other staff conducting business in the facilities must meet minimum standards of law enforcement personnel as prescribed in 25 CFR part 12, subpart D, “Qualifications and Training Requirements.” Those tribal programs not receiving Federal funding under the Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act (Public Law 93-638, as amended) who wish to be accredited are encouraged to use the policies and standards in that part since they have been modified and approved for Indian country.
#### The City of New York, Appellant, v. New York City Railway Company, Respondent (Car License C-1).

Judgment affirmed, with" costs, on opinion in the court below. (Reported in 55 Mise. Rep. 134.)
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 31 (Tuesday, February 15, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 8785]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-3537]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD


Sunshine Act Meetings: February 2011

TIME AND DATES: All meetings are held at 2:30 p.m.

Tuesday, February 1;
Wednesday, February 2;
Thursday, February 3;
Tuesday, February 15;
Wednesday, February 16;
Thursday, February 17;
Tuesday, February 22;
Wednesday, February 23;
Thursday, February 24.

PLACE: Board Agenda Room, No. 11820, 1099 14th St., NW., Washington, DC 
20570.

STATUS:  Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Pursuant to Sec.  102.139(a) of the Board's 
Rules and Regulations, the Board or a panel thereof will consider ``the 
issuance of a subpoena, the Board's participation in a civil action or 
proceeding or an arbitration, or the initiation, conduct, or 
disposition * * * of particular representation or unfair labor practice 
proceedings under section 8, 9, or 10 of the [National Labor Relations] 
Act, or any court proceedings collateral or ancillary thereto.'' See 
also 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(10).

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Lester A. Heltzer, Executive 
Secretary, (202) 273-1067.

    Dated: February 11, 2011.
Lester A. Heltzer,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011-3537 Filed 2-11-11; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 7545-01-P
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Clay B. Siegall,
certify that:



|1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of Seattle Genetics, Inc.; and
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                     
|---------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: September 15, 2017                                             
|                                                                     
|/s/    Clay B. Siegall                                               
|Clay B. Siegall
Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
# C_2013094EN.01000901.xml

| 3.4.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 94/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.4.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 94/9

---

Notice of the impending expiry of certain anti-dumping measures

2013/C 94/08

1.   As provided for in Article 11(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 of 30 November 2009 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community (1), the Commission gives notice that, unless a review is initiated in accordance with the following procedure, the anti-dumping measures mentioned below will expire on the date mentioned in the table below.

1

2.   Procedure

Procedure

Union producers may lodge a written request for a review. This request must contain sufficient evidence that the expiry of the measures would be likely to result in a continuation or recurrence of dumping and injury.

Should the Commission decide to review the measures concerned, importers, exporters, representatives of the exporting country and Union producers will then be provided with the opportunity to amplify, rebut or comment on the matters set out in the review request.

3.   Time limit

Time limit

Union producers may submit a written request for a review on the above basis, to reach the European Commission, Directorate-General for Trade (Unit H-1), N-105 8/20, 1049 Brussels, Belgium (2) at any time from the date of the publication of the present notice but no later than three months before the date mentioned in the table below.

2

4.   This notice is published in accordance with Article 11(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009.

| Product | Country(ies) of origin or exportation | Measures | Reference | Date of expiry (3) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Certain prepared or preserved citrus fruits
  (namely mandarins, etc.) | People's Republic of China | Anti-dumping duty | Council Regulation (EC) No 1355/2008 (OJ L 350, 30.12.2008, p. 35) and Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 158/2013 (OJ L 49, 22.2.2013, p. 29) | 31.12.2013 |

Product

Country(ies) of origin or exportation

Measures

Reference

Date of expiry (3)

3

Certain prepared or preserved citrus fruits

(namely mandarins, etc.)

People's Republic of China

Anti-dumping duty

Council Regulation (EC) No 1355/2008 (OJ L 350, 30.12.2008, p. 35) and Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 158/2013 (OJ L 49, 22.2.2013, p. 29)

31.12.2013

---

(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 51.

1

(2)  Fax +32 22956505.

2

(3)  The measure expires at midnight of the day mentioned in this column.

3

---
§ 1187.11 What must an application include? An application for a grant under the IBIP must include: ( a ) A certification that the applicant: ( 1 ) Is an eligible applicant;
( 2 ) Has or will designate an executive director or program manager to manage the business incubator; and
( 3 ) Agrees to: ( i ) A site evaluation by the Secretary as part of the final selection process;
( ii ) An annual programmatic and financial examination for the duration of the grant; and
( iii ) To the maximum extent practicable, to remedy any problems identified pursuant to the site evaluation and examination;
( b ) A description of the one or more reservation communities to be served by the business incubator;
( c ) A three-year plan that describes: ( 1 ) The number of Native businesses and Native entrepreneurs to be participating in the business incubator;
( 2 ) Whether the business incubator will focus on a particular type of business or industry;
( 3 ) A detailed breakdown of the services to be offered to Native businesses and Native entrepreneurs participating in the business incubator; and
( 4 ) A detailed breakdown of the services, if any, to be offered to Native businesses and Native entrepreneurs not participating in the business incubator;
( d ) Information demonstrating the effectiveness and experience of the eligible applicant in: ( 1 ) Conducting financial, management, and marketing assistance programs designed to educate or improve the business skills of current or prospective businesses;
( 2 ) Working in and providing services to Native American communities;
( 3 ) Providing assistance to entities conducting business in reservation communities;
( 4 ) Providing technical assistance under Federal business and entrepreneurial development programs for which Native businesses and Native entrepreneurs are eligible; and
( 5 ) Managing finances and staff effectively;
( e ) A description of the applicant's non-Federal contributions, in an amount equal to not less than 25 percent of the grant amount requested; and
( f ) A site description of the location at which the eligible applicant will provide physical workspace, including a description of the technologies, equipment, and other resources that will be available to Native businesses and Native entrepreneurs participating in the business incubator, if the applicant is in possession of the site, or a written site proposal containing the information in § 1187.12, if the applicant is not yet in possession of the site.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Gus Bethea, Appellant.

[824 NYS2d 128]

*490Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kangs County (Starkey, J.), rendered May 12, 2003, convicting him of robbery in the first degree (two counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant has not preserved for appellate review his contention that the Supreme Court improperly failed to conduct a *Ventimiglia*hearing *(see People v Ventimiglia,*52 NY2d 350 [1981]) to determine the admissibility of certain testimony regarding a telephone call made by the defendant’s friend to one of the complainants *(see*CPL 470.05 [2]; *People v Gray,*86 NY2d 10, 19 [1995]; *People v Cody,*149 AD2d 722 [1989]). In any event, such testimony was properly introduced as some evidence of the defendant’s consciousness of guilt *(see People v Plummer,*36 NY2d 161, 163-164 [1975]; *People v Almestica,*288 AD2d 483 [2001]; *People v Pitts,*218 AD2d 715 [1995]). Additionally, the Supreme Court gave the jury proper limiting instructions *(see People v Almestica, supra).*

The defendant was not denied his right to effective assistance of counsel *(see People v Benevento,*91 NY2d 708, 714 [1998]; *People v Baldi,*54 NY2d 137, 147 [1981]).

The sentence imposed was not excessive *(see People v Suitte,*90 AD2d 80 [1982]). Ritter, J.P., Goldstein, Rivera and Spolzino, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 13.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the annual report on
Form 20-F of GasLog Ltd., a Bermuda exempted company (the “Company”), for the period ending December 31, 2016, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned officer of the Company
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in the report.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



The foregoing certification is provided
solely for purposes of complying with the provisions of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not intended to be
used or relied upon for any other purpose.



| |     |  | Date: March 1, 2017            | 
| | --- |  | ------------------------------ | 
| | By: |  | /s/ Paul A. Wogan              | 
| |     |  | Name: Paul A. Wogan            | 
| |     |  | Title: Chief Executive Officer |
# C_2013010EN.01000402.xml

| 15.1.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 10/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.1.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 10/4

---

Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries

2013/C 10/07

In accordance with Article 35(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), a decision has been taken to close the fishery as set down in the following table:

1

| Date and time of closure | 7.12.2012 |
| --- | --- |
| Duration | 7.12.2012-31.12.2012 |
| Member State | Lithuania |
| Stock or Group of stocks | GHL/N3LMNO |
| Species | Greenland Halibut (Reinhardtius hippoglossoides) |
| Zone | NAFO 3LMNO |
| Type(s) of fishing vessels | — |
| Reference number | FS82TQ44 |

Date and time of closure

7.12.2012

Duration

7.12.2012-31.12.2012

Member State

Lithuania

Stock or Group of stocks

GHL/N3LMNO

Species

Greenland Halibut (Reinhardtius hippoglossoides)

Reinhardtius hippoglossoides

Zone

NAFO 3LMNO

Type(s) of fishing vessels

—

Reference number

FS82TQ44

---

(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.

1

---
§ 11.100 Where are Courts of Indian Offenses established? ( a ) A list of the areas in Indian Country where Courts of Indian Offenses are established is available on the Bureau of Indian Affairs website (*www.bia.gov*) and is published periodically in the Federal Register.
( b ) The Director, Bureau of Indian Affairs, will maintain on the Bureau of Indian Affairs website (*www.bia.gov*) an updated list of the areas in Indian Country where Courts of Indian Offenses are established and, upon any change to the list, will publish notice of the change in the Federal Register with an updated complete list.
[85 FR 646, Jan. 7, 2020]
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 926 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 926

 To require the Secretary of the Army to issue an environmental impact 
  statement before the International Joint Commission implements any 
water regulation plan affecting the water levels of Lake Ontario or the 
                          St. Lawrence River.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 2, 1999

  Mr. McHugh introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, and in addition to the 
 Committee on Resources, for a period to be subsequently determined by 
the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall 
           within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To require the Secretary of the Army to issue an environmental impact 
  statement before the International Joint Commission implements any 
water regulation plan affecting the water levels of Lake Ontario or the 
                          St. Lawrence River.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REQUIREMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT.

    Before the International Joint Commission implements any water 
regulation plan affecting the water levels of Lake Ontario or the St. 
Lawrence River, the Secretary of the Army shall issue an environmental 
impact statement under section 102(2)(C) of the National Environmental 
Policy Act (42 U.S.C. 4332(2)(C)) with respect to such plan.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 34.5





Report of Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm





To the Board of Directors
of CoreLogic, Inc.:



We have examined management's
assertion, included in the accompanying Report on Assessment of Compliance, that CoreLogic Commercial Real Estate Services, Inc.
(the “Company”), an indirect subsidiary of CoreLogic, Inc. complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d)
of the Securities and Exchange Commission's Regulation AB for all loans for commercial mortgage loan outsourcing customers for
which the Company served as the commercial tax service provider (the “Platform”), as of December 31, 2011 and for the
year then ended, only including 1122(d)(1)(iv), 1122(d)(2)(v), 1122(d)(2)(vi), 1122(d)(2)(vii), 1122(d)(4)(xi), 1122(d)(4)(xii)
and 1122(d)(4)(xiii), which the Company has determined are applicable to the servicing activities performed by it with respect
to the Platform. Management is responsible for the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express
an opinion on management's assertion based on our examination.



Our examination was conducted
in accordance with attestation standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included
examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the applicable servicing criteria and performing such
other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing of selected servicing activities
related to the Platform, and determining whether the Company performed those selected activities in compliance with the applicable
servicing criteria. Our procedures were limited to the selected servicing activities performed by the Company during the period
covered by this report. Our procedures were not designed to detect noncompliance arising from errors that may have occurred prior
to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period
covered by this report. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide
a legal determination on the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria.



In our opinion, management's
assertion that the Company complied with the aforementioned applicable servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December
31, 2011 for all loans for commercial mortgage loan outsourcing customers for which the Company served as the commercial tax service
provider is fairly stated, in all material respects.





/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP



February 8, 2012







PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, 2001 Ross Avenue,
Suite 18oo, Dallas, TX 75201-2997

T: (214) 999 1400, F: (214) 754 7991, www.pwc.com/us
EXHIBIT 32.2

Statement of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Knight Capital
Group, Inc. (the Company) for the quarter ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Steven Bisgay, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or, 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/    STEVEN BISGAYName:

Steven BisgayTitle:

Chief Financial Officer


Date: November 9, 2007

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and shall not, except to the extent required by
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 23-0376

IN THE MATTER OF:

M.S., 

Respondent and Appellant

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including June 12, 2024, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

May 6 2024

05/06/2024

Case Number: DA 23-0376