alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          31,124
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                31,124
<PP&E>                                           3,258
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  34,382
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,605,402
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      8,810
<COMMON>                                        20,249
<OTHER-SE>                                   8,942,611
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    34,382
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               769,751
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              43,107
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (769,751)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (914,383)
<EPS-BASIC>                                  (0.013)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0



</TABLE>
### **CHAPTER 971—ISSUE OF SERVICEABLE MATERIAL OTHER THAN TO ARMED FORCES**

Sec.
[9651.
Repealed.]
9652.
Rifles and ammunition for target practice: educational institutions having corps of cadets.
9653.
Ordnance and ordnance stores: District of Columbia high schools.
9654.
Supplies: military instruction camps.
9655.
Arms and ammunition: agencies and departments of United States.
9656.
Aircraft and equipment: civilian aviation schools.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**2018**—Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, §806(d)(1), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1833, redesignated chapter 941 of this title as this chapter.

**2013**—Pub. L. 112–239, div. A, title V, §552(c)(4), Jan. 2, 2013, 126 Stat. 1741, struck out item 9651 "Arms, tentage, and equipment: educational institutions not maintaining units of A.F.R.O.T.C."

**2009**—Pub. L. 111–84, div. A, title X, §1073(a)(32), Oct. 28, 2009, 123 Stat. 2474, transferred item 9515 "Charter air transportation services: minimum annual purchase amount for carriers participating in Civil Reserve Air Fleet" to chapter 931 of this title.

**2008**—Pub. L. 110–417, [div. A], title X, §1033(b), Oct. 14, 2008, 122 Stat. 4593, added item 9515 at end.
#### People of the State of Illinois, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. James Ezell, Defendant-Appellant.

Gen. No. 49,722.

First District, Second Division.

June 15, 1965.

R. Eugene Pincham and Charles B. Evins, of Chicago, for appellant;

Daniel P. Ward, State’s Attorney of Cook County, of Chicago (Elmer C. Kissane and Joseph A. Malek, Assistant State’s Attorneys, of counsel), for appellee.

Opinion by

JUSTICE BURKE.

Not to be published in full.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

# Korean Naval Academy Honors US Naval Officer Killed in Korean War

By Lt. Ross Randall, CommanderU.S. Naval Forces Korea Public Affairs

                CHINHAE, Republic of Korea  –              

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

pacom

news

articles
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 153 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 153

Amending House Resolution 5, One Hundred Sixth Congress, as amended by 
           House Resolution 129, One Hundred Sixth Congress.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 28, 1999

Mr. Cox (for himself and Mr. Dicks) submitted the following resolution; 
              which was referred to the Committee on Rules

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Amending House Resolution 5, One Hundred Sixth Congress, as amended by 
           House Resolution 129, One Hundred Sixth Congress.

    Resolved,

SECTION 1. AMENDMENT OF HOUSE RESOLUTION 5.

    Section 2(f)(1) of House Resolution 5, One Hundred Sixth Congress, 
agreed to January 6, 1999 (as amended by House Resolution 129, One 
Hundred Sixth Congress, agreed to March 24, 1999), is amended by 
striking ``April 30, 1999'' and inserting ``May 14, 1999''.
                                 <all>
```
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

HAYWARD HOPKINS,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 2D23-1560

December 27, 2023

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for 

Pinellas County; Philip J. Federico, Judge.

Deborah A. Goins of Escobar, Michaels & Associates, P.A., Tampa, for 

Appellant.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

CASANUEVA, KHOUZAM, and LUCAS, JJ., Concur.

Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

# 7th Fleet Aircraft Transits Taiwan Strait

By U.S. 7th Fleet Public Affairs

                TAIWAN STRAIT  –              
A U.S. Navy P-8A Poseidon transited the Taiwan Strait in international airspace on October 12 (local time). By operating within the Taiwan Strait in accordance with international law, the United States upholds the navigational rights and freedoms of all nations. The aircraft's transit of the Taiwan Strait demonstrates the United States' commitment to a free and open Indo-Pacific. The United States military flies, sails and operates anywhere international law allows.

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT
### **CHAPTER 735—HOSPITALIZATION**

Sec.
7263.
When Secretary may require.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**2018**—Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, §808(e)(2)(A), (f)(1), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1839, redesignated chapter 355 of this title as this chapter and item 3723 as 7263.

**1986**—Pub. L. 99–661, div. A, title VI, §604(f)(1)(B)(ii), Nov. 14, 1986, 100 Stat. 3877, struck out item 3721 "Members of Army, other than of Regular Army" and item 3722 "Members of C.M.T.C.; members of Army not covered by section 3721 of this title."

**1958**—Pub. L. 85–861, §1(92)(D), Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1482, substituted "Members of C.M.T.C." for "Members of R.O.T.C. and C.M.T.C." in item 3722.
**AD Economic Evaluation**

Docket No. FAA - 2010 - 0491 Directorate ID: 2009 - SW - 64 - AD Helicopter Model: Eurocopter France Model AS332L2 Helicopters Number of Helicopters (U.S. Operators): 0 Helicopters in the US Registry , therefore there are no costs of co mpliance for US operators . Reason: Discovery of broken swashplate bearing attaching screw heads. Costs : Parts per Helicopter $ N/A (P/N: XXXXXXXXX ) Labor per Helicopter ( XX x $ 8 5 /work- hour) $ N/A Other (Explain) Total Cost per Helicopter $ N/A Total Fleet Cost $ N/A Executive Order 12866 : Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action?” Yes ( ) No (  ) DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures : Is the AD significant? Yes ( ) Explain Below No (  ) Regulatory Flexibility Ac t : Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Yes ( ) No (  ) Project Engineer: Gary Roach
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# 7th Fleet Destroyer transit Taiwan Strait

7th Fleet Public Affairs

TAIWAN STRAIT -- The Arleigh Burke-class guided-missile destroyer USS Chung-Hoon (DDG 93) conducted a routine Taiwan Strait transit Jan. 5 (local time) through waters where high-seas freedoms of navigation and overflight apply in accordance with international law. The ship transited through a corridor in the Strait that is beyond the territorial sea of any coastal State. Chung-Hoon’s transit through the Taiwan Strait demonstrates the United States’ commitment to a free and open Indo-Pacific. The United States military flies, sails and operates anywhere international law allows.

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             NOV-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-1999
<CASH>                                            6963
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    86093
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (903)
<INVENTORY>                                     128515
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 35968
<PP&E>                                          358935
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (94208)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  661945
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           120573
<BONDS>                                         300453
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                        5973
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    661945
<SALES>                                         574664
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                574664
<CGS>                                           493095
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   542791
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  1557
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    94
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               44413
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (2895)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      9710
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (12605)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (12605)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
#### Emmons County *vs.*Calvin B. McLain.

Opinion filed November 13, 1900.

(84 N. W. Rep. 1117.)

Appeal from District Court, Emmons County; *Winchester,*J.

*George M. Register*and *Cochrane & Corliss,*for appellant.

*H. A. Armstrong*and *F. H. Register,*for respondents.

Per Curiam.

The controlling questions in this case were involved and decided in the case of *Emmons Co.*v. *Thompson*(decided this term) 9 N. D. 598, 84 N. W. Rep. 385. The order appealed from is in all things reversed, and the District Court is directed to enter an order reversing the same, and also to enter an order denying the application made herein to vacate said judgment and tax sale, with costs of both courts to appellant.
**Exhibit 99.1**

 

**REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

To the Sole Stockholder and the Board of Directors of

TERP Spanish HoldCo, S.L. (Sociedad unipersonal):

 

**Opinion on the Financial Statements**

 

We have audited the consolidated balance sheet of TERP Spanish HoldCo, S.L. (Sociedad unipersonal) and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2018, the related consolidated statement of operations, comprehensive income, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows, for the period from June 12, 2018 to December 31, 2018, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “financial statements”). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2018, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the period from June 12, 2018 to December 31, 2018, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

 

**Basis for Opinion**

 

These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s financial statements based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States of America) (“PCAOB”) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

 

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audit, we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on theeffectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.

 

Our audit included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audit also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audit provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

 
| /s/   DELOITTE, S.L.     |   |
|--------------------------|--------|
|                     |   |
|                     |   |
| Madrid,   Spain          |   |
| February 28,   2019 |   |

 

We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2014.

 

----
#### § 304.33 Preservation of records.

The agency will preserve all correspondence pertaining to the requests that it receives under this subpart, as well as copies of all requested records, until disposition or destruction is authorized by title 44 of the United States Code or the National Archives and Records Administration's General Records Schedule 14. Records will not be disposed of while they are the subject of a pending request, appeal, or lawsuit under the Act.
### **CHAPTER 781—MILITARY CLAIMS**

Sec.
7801.
Definition.
7802.
Admiralty claims against the United States.
7803.
Admiralty claims by United States.
7804.
Salvage claims by United States.
7806.
Settlement or compromise: final and conclusive.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**2018**—Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, §808(e)(4), (f)(1), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1839, redesignated chapter 451 of this title as this chapter and items 4801 to 4806 as 7801 to 7806, respectively.

**1972**—Pub. L. 92–417, §1(2), Aug. 29, 1972, 86 Stat. 654, substituted "Admiralty claims against the United States" for "Damage by United States vessels; towage and salvage of United States vessels" in item 4802.

**1960**—Pub. L. 86–533, §1(8)(B), June 29, 1960, 74 Stat. 247, struck out item 4805 "Reports to Congress".
155 So.2d 296

#### Ex parte Ward Raymond LEE.

3 Div. 77.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

June 27, 1963.

*344Ward Raymond Lee, pro se.

Richmond M. Flowers, Atty. Gen., and Peter M. Lind, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.

LAWSON, Justice.

Ward Raymond Lee, who is confined in the penitentiary of this state, filed before a judge of the Circuit Court of Montgomery County a petition praying for his discharge in a habeas corpus proceeding. Lee was unsuccessful. Fie has not appealed from the order of the trial judge, as is authorized by § 369, Title 15, Code *1940,*but has filed an original petition for writ of habeas corpus in this court.

In Ex parte Winnagle, 269 Ala. 668, 115 So.2d 261, referred to in Ex parte Thomas, 270 Ala. 411, 118 So.2d 738, and in Ex parte Rockholt, 271 Ala. 68, 122 So.2d 162, we said:

> “Since the case of Ex parte Simon-ton, 9 Port. 383, it has been regarded as settled that the writ of habeas corpus may issue from this court only when necessary in the exercise of the ‘general superintendence and control of inferior jurisdictions’ with which it is clothed by the Constitution. § 140, Constitution of 1901; Ex parte Chaney, 8 Ala. 424; Ex parte Croom, 19 Ala. 561.

> “The necessity which will authorize the issuance of the writ from this court does not exist unless a judge of some court invested with jurisdiction to act in the premises, has undertaken to decide upon the case of a party aggrieved or else, without any just cause therefor, has refused to entertain the same. Ex parte Simonton, 9 Port. 383.” Ex parte Winnagle, 269 Ala. 669, 115 So.2d 262.

Some of the language used in the Winnagle case may be susceptible of the construction that we will entertain an original petition for writ of habeas corpus by a party aggrieved on the trial of a habeascorpus irrespective of the fact that an appeal will lie. We did not intend by the use of that language to so hold.

We now hold that where an appeal may be taken as prescribed by § 369, Title 15, this court in the absence of unusual circumstances will not entertain an original petition for writ of habeas corpus.

The petition is denied.

Denied.

LIVINGSTON, C. J., and GOODWYN and COLEMAN, JJ., concur.
§ 161.716 How are the proceeds from trespass distributed? Unless otherwise provided by Navajo Nation law: ( a ) BIA will treat any amounts recovered under § 161.712 as proceeds from the sale of agricultural property from the Navajo Partitioned Lands upon which the trespass occurred.
( b ) Proceeds recovered under § 161.712 may be distributed to: ( 1 ) Repair damages of the Navajo Partitioned Lands and property; or
( 2 ) Reimburse the affected parties, including the permittee for loss due to the trespass, as negotiated and provided in the permit.
( c ) Reimburse for costs associated with the enforcement.
( d ) If any money is left over after the distribution of the proceeds described in paragraph (b) of this section, BIA will return it to the trespasser or, where the owner of the impounded property cannot be identified within 180 days, the net proceeds of the sale will be deposited into the appropriate Navajo Nation account or transferred to the Navajo Nation under applicable tribal law.