alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________

No. 99-40039

Summary Calendar

_____________________

GILBERTO TREVINO,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

TIMOTHY D. SANDERS, RN, Michael Unit; 

ANICETO DOMINGUEZ, Doctor, Coffield Unit; 

JOHN ZOND, Dr., Michael Unit; UNIDENTIFIED

RIGGLEMAN, X-ray Technician, Michael Unit; 

LOUIS E. GIBSON, Medical Director, Michael 

Unit; GARY L. JOHNSON, Director, Texas 

Department of Criminal Justice,

Defendants-Appellees.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 6:98-CV-538

_________________________________________________________________

November 11, 1999

Before JOLLY, JONES, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Gilberto Trevino, Texas prisoner # 578527, appeals from the

district court’s dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights

complaint for failure to exhaust his administrative remedies, 42

U.S.C. § 1997e(a). Trevino filed his suit after the effective date

of the Prison Litigation Reform Act (“PLRA”), and his case is thus

governed by the provisions therein. See Underwood v. Wilson, 151
2

F.3d 292, 293 (5th Cir. 1998), cert. denied, 119 S.Ct. 1809 (1999).

The PLRA amended § 1997e to require that a prisoner must exhaust

his administrative remedies before filing a § 1983 action. See

§ 1997e(a). Trevino did not exhaust administrative remedies before

filing suit, and his purported exhaustion of administrative

remedies during the pendency of his suit does not satisfy the

requirements of § 1997e(a). See Underwood, 151 F.3d at 296.

Accordingly, the district court’s dismissal is AFFIRMED. Trevino’s

motions for production of documents, a temporary restraining order,

and an expedited ruling are DENIED.

JUDGMENT AFFIRMED; MOTIONS DENIED.
II

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 911

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

APRIL 13, 1999

Received

AN ACT

To designate the Federal building located at 310 New Bern

Avenue in Raleigh, North Carolina, as the ‘‘Terry Sanford Federal Building’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

HR 911 RDS

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

2 The Federal building located at 310 New Bern Ave3 nue in Raleigh, North Carolina, shall be known and des4 ignated as the ‘‘Terry Sanford Federal Building’’.

5 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

6 Any reference in law, map, regulation, document,

7 paper, or other record of the United States to the Federal

8 building referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be

9 a reference to the ‘‘Terry Sanford Federal Building’’.

Passed the House of Representatives April 12, 1999.

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL,

Clerk.
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Clay B. Siegall,
certify that:



|1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of Seattle Genetics, Inc.; and
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: April 13, 2018



|                                                                     
|---------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Clay B. Siegall                                                  
|Clay B. Siegall
Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
EXHIBIT 31.2
 CERTIFICATION
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Quicksilver Resources Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
    /s/ Philip Cook

Philip Cook
Senior Vice President  Chief Financial Officer
§ 11.1105 Preliminary inquiry. ( a ) If a minor is placed in shelter care, the children's court shall conduct a preliminary inquiry with 24 hours for the purpose of determining: ( 1 ) Whether probable cause exists to believe the minor is a minor-in-need-of care; and
( 2 ) Whether continued shelter care is necessary pending further proceedings.
( b ) If a minor has been released to the parents, guardian or custodian, the children's court shall conduct a preliminary inquiry within three days after receipt of the complaint for the sole purpose of determining whether probable cause exists to believe the minor is a minor-in-need-of-care.
( c ) If the minor's parents, guardian or custodian is not present at the preliminary inquiry, the children's court shall determine what efforts have been made to notify and obtain the presence of the parent, guardian or custodian. If it appears that further efforts are likely to produce the parent, guardian or custodian, the children's court shall recess for no more than 24 hours and direct that continued efforts be made to obtain the presence of the parents, guardian or custodian.
( d ) All the rights listed in § 11.906 of this part shall be afforded the parties in the minor-in-need-of care preliminary inquiry except that the court is not required to appoint counsel if the parties cannot afford one. Notice of the inquiry shall be given to the minor, and his or her parents, guardian or custodian and their counsel as soon as the time for the inquiry has been established.
( e ) The children's court shall hear testimony concerning: ( 1 ) The circumstances that gave rise to the complaint or the taking of the minor into custody; and
( 2 ) The need for shelter care.
( f ) If the children's court finds that probable cause exists to believe the minor is a minor-in-need-of-care, the minor shall be released to the parents, guardian or custodian, and ordered to appear at the adjudicatory hearing, unless: ( 1 ) There is reasonable cause to believe that the minor will run away and be unavailable for further proceedings;
( 2 ) There is reasonable cause to believe that the minor is in immediate danger from parents, guardian or custodian and that removal from them is necessary; or
( 3 ) There is a reasonable cause to believe that the minor will commit a serious act causing damage to person or property.
( g ) The children's court may release the minor pursuant to paragraph (f) of this section to a relative or other responsible adult tribal member if the parents, guardian or custodian of the minor consent to the release. If the minor is ten years to age or older, the minor and the parents, guardian or custodian must both consent to the release.
( h ) Upon finding that probable cause exists to believe that the minor is a minor-in-need-of-care and that there is a need for shelter care, the minor's shelter care shall be continued. Otherwise, the complaint shall be dismissed and the minor released.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-1441

DAVID O. ROY,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INCORPORATED,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior

District Judge. (CA-96-966-A)

Submitted: September 25, 1997 Decided: October 23, 1997

Before LUTTIG, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

David O. Roy, Appellant Pro Se. James Phillip Naughton, HUNTON &

WILLIAMS, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order granting summary

judgment to Defendant in this action brought pursuant to Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended. We have reviewed the

record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. Roy v. United Parcel Serv., Inc., No. CA-96-966-A (E.D. Va.

Mar 7, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
§ 141.10 License fees for reservation businesses. ( a ) Prior to the issuance of an initial license, each licensee who is not a member of the Navajo tribe shall pay the following amount: ( 1 ) If the license is issued before July 1, the licensee shall pay fifty dollars ($50).
( 2 ) If the license is issued on or after July 1, the licensee shall pay twenty-five dollars ($25).
( b ) Each licensed business owner who is not a member of the Navajo tribe shall pay on or before January 10 of each year an annual license fee determined as follows based on the licensee's most recent annual report: ( 1 ) If the licensee's gross receipts are less than one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000) for the year or the licensee has not yet been required to file its first annual report, the license fee is fifty dollars ($50).
( 2 ) If the licensee's gross receipts for the year are at least one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000) but not more than four hundred and ninety-nine thousand nine hundred and ninety-nine dollars ($499,999) the fee is one hundred dollars ($100).
( 3 ) If the licensee's gross receipts for the year are at least five hundred thousand dollars ($500,000) but not more than seven hundred and forty-nine thousand nine hundred and ninety-nine dollars ($749,999), the fee is two hundred dollars ($200).
( 4 ) If the licensee's gross receipts for the year are seven hundred fifty thousand dollars ($750,000) or more, the fee is three hundred dollars ($300).
( c ) The Navajo Area Director shall determine the annual license fee payable by licensees who are enrolled members of the Navajo Tribe. The license fee for an enrolled member of the Navajo Tribe may not be less than twenty percent (20%) nor greater than one hundred percent (100 percent) of the amount the licensee would be required to pay if the licensee were not a tribal member.
( d ) All fees are payable to the Area Director and shall be deposited to the credit of the account “Special Deposits.”
[40 FR 39835, Aug. 29, 1975, as amended at 59 FR 54502, Oct. 31, 1994]
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Avalon Holdings Corporation on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Ronald E. Klingle, Chief Executive Officer of Avalon Holdings Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Avalon Holdings Corporation.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Ronald E. Klingle  
|Ronald E. Klingle      
|Chief Executive Officer
|August 11, 2009
#### § 20.2 Preparation of agency statements.

In accordance with schedules established under § 20.7 each agency shall submit for publication in the Manual an official draft of the information required by § 9.2 of this chapter and this part 20.
### **[CHAPTER 89—REPEALED]**
§ 162.445 May the parties amend a business lease? The parties may amend a business lease by obtaining: ( a ) The lessee's signature;
( b ) The Indian landowners' consent under the requirements in § 162.446; and
( c ) BIA approval of the amendment under §§ 162.447 and 162.448.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

JOSE LUIS DIAZ, M.D.,

INDIVIDUALLY AND D/B/A JOSE

LUIS DIAZ, M.D.

, P.A.,

Appellant

,

v.

JOSIE GARMON

,

Appellee. §

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 12

- 00 084

- CV

Appeal from the

448th J udicial District Court

of El Paso County , Texas

(TC# 20 08

- 1183 )

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Pending before the Court is the joint motion of Appellant, Jose Luis Diaz, M.D.

, and

Appellee, Josie Garmon

, to dismiss this appeal pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure

42.1, because they have settled all claims and i ssues between them

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P.

42.1(a)(2). We grant the motion and dismiss the appeal without prejudice

. Pursuant to the

parties’ agreement

, the parties shall bear their own costs

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.1(d).

May 15, 2013 GUADALUPE RIVERA, Justice

Before McClure, C. J., Rivera, and Rodriguez, JJ.
# C_2013054EN.01000801.xml

| 23.2.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 54/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.2.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 54/8

---

Notice of the Government of Romania pursuant to Council Directive 2009/119/EC imposing an obligation on Member States to maintain minimum stocks of crude oil and/or petroleum products

2013/C 54/07

In accordance with Article 9(4) of Council Directive 2009/119/EC of 14 September 2009 imposing an obligation on Member States to maintain minimum stocks of crude oil and/or petroleum products, Romania hereby notifies its undertaking to maintain specific stocks.

| 1. | The level of specific stocks Romania undertakes to maintain is equivalent to 30 days of average daily consumption. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The level of specific stocks Romania undertakes to maintain is equivalent to 30 days of average daily consumption.

| 2. | The undertaking applies to the period from 1 January to 31 December 2013. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The undertaking applies to the period from 1 January to 31 December 2013.

---
### §12774. Retired lists

(a) Under regulations prescribed by the Secretary concerned, there shall be maintained retired lists containing the names of the Reserves of the armed forces under the Secretary's jurisdiction who are in the Retired Reserve.

(b) The Secretary of the Navy shall maintain a United States Naval Reserve Retired List containing the names of members of the Navy Reserve and the Marine Corps Reserve entitled to retired pay.

(Added Pub. L. 103–337, div. A, title XVI, §1662(k)(1), Oct. 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 3006; amended Pub. L. 109–163, div. A, title V, §515(b)(1)(NN), Jan. 6, 2006, 119 Stat. 3234.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

Provisions similar to those in this section were contained in sections 1376(a) and 6017 of this title, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 103–337, §1662(k)(2), (3)(A)(i).

#### Amendments

2006—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 109–163 substituted "the Navy Reserve" for "the Naval Reserve".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Dec. 1, 1994, except as otherwise provided, see section 1691 of Pub. L. 103–337, set out as a note under section 10001 of this title.
### §14112. Dissemination of names of officers selected

(a) Time for Dissemination.—The names of the officers recommended for promotion in the report of a selection board shall be disseminated to the armed force concerned as follows:

(1) In the case of officers recommended for promotion to a grade below brigadier general or rear admiral (lower half), such names may be disseminated upon, or at any time after, the transmittal of the report to the President.

(2) In the case of officers recommended for promotion to a grade above colonel or, in the case of the Navy, captain, such names may be disseminated upon, or at any time after, the approval of the report by the President.

(3) In the case of officers whose names have not been sooner disseminated, such names shall be promptly disseminated—

(A) upon confirmation of the promotion of the officers by the Senate (in the case of promotions required to be submitted to the Senate for confirmation); or

(B) upon the approval of the report by the President (in the case of promotions not required to be submitted to the Senate for confirmation).

(b) Names Not Disseminated.—A list of names of officers disseminated under subsection (a) may not include—

(1) any name removed by the President from the report of the selection board containing that name, if dissemination is under the authority of paragraph (2) or (3)(B) of that subsection; or

(2) the name of any officer whose promotion the Senate failed to confirm, if dissemination is under the authority of paragraph (3)(A) of that subsection.

(Added Pub. L. 103–337, div. A, title XVI, §1611, Oct. 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 2930; amended Pub. L. 106–398, §1 [[div. A], title V, §503(b)], Oct. 30, 2000, 114 Stat. 1654, 1654A–101.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

Provisions similar to those in this section were contained in section 5898(d) of this title, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 103–337, §1629(b)(2).

#### Amendments

2000—Pub. L. 106–398 amended text generally. Prior to amendment, text read as follows: "Upon approval by the President of the report of a promotion board, the names of the officers recommended for promotion by the promotion board (other than any name removed by the President) may be disseminated to the armed force concerned. If those names have not been sooner disseminated, those names (other than the name of any officer whose promotion the Senate failed to confirm) shall be promptly disseminated to the armed force concerned upon confirmation by the Senate."

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Oct. 1, 1996, see section 1691(b)(1) of Pub. L. 103–337, set out as a note under section 10001 of this title.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Avalon Holdings Corporation on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Ronald E.
Klingle, Chief Executive Officer of Avalon Holdings Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Avalon Holdings Corporation.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Ronald E. Klingle  
|Ronald E. Klingle      
|Chief Executive Officer
|                       
|November 11, 2005
#### Alfred PAGE, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America.

No. 15196.

United States Court of Appeals Eighth Circuit.

Nov. 12, 1954.

Alfred Page, pro se.

Harry Richards, U. S. Atty., and Robert C. Tucker, Asst. U. S. Atty., St. Louis, Mo., for appellee.

Appeal from District Court docketed and dismissed for want of prosecution, on motion of appellee.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly  Report of Hometown Auto  Retailers,  Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period  ending  September 30, 2004 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Corey E. Shaker, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify,
pursuant  to 18  U.S.C.  ss.  1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  ss.  906  of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.


/s/ Corey E. Shaker
-------------------------------------
Corey E. Shaker
President and Chief Executive Officer
November 11, 2004


                                       28
#### § 1200.42 Who can provide technical assistance?

A sample of competent providers includes any of the following entities with the appropriate skills and capabilities: available DOI or OST staff; intertribal organizations; public agencies; and contracted private investment firms.
§ 1001.6 Submitting applications. ( a ) Applications for inclusion in the applicant pool will be accepted on an on-going basis.
( b ) Applications may be mailed or hand-delivered.
( c ) Applications for negotiations in 1996 that are mailed must be postmarked no later than May 16, 1995.
( d ) Applications must be sent to: Director, Office of Self Governance, Department of the Interior, 1849 C Street, NW., MIB RM/MS-2548, Washington, DC 20240.
#### § 1000.1 Authority.

This part is prepared and issued by the Secretary of the Interior under the negotiated rulemaking procedures in 5 U.S.C. 565.