alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 11**  **- 1583** 

MICHAEL SCHMIDT; DEBORAH BARKER , Plaintiffs

- Appellants ,
v. WELLS FARGO HOME MORTGAGE, a division of WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. , Defendant

- Appell ee .

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Richmond
. James R. Spencer , Chief District Judge. ( 3:11

- cv - 00059

- JRS )

Submitted : October 23, 2012 Decided: October 31, 2012

Before WILKINSON , SHEDD, and DAVIS , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion
. Jimmy Ray Howell, Jr., JR HOWELL & ASSOCIATES, Washington, D.C., for Appellants. John C. Lynch, Ethan G. Ostroff, TROUTMAN SANDERS, LLP, Virginia Beach, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublishe d opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Michael Schmidt and Deborah Barker filed a complaint and amended complaint against Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, seeking to assert, inter alia, claims for fraud and claims under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act and the Virginia Consumer Protection Act. The district court dismissed the complaint
pur suant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6 ), concluding that Schmidt and Barker failed to state a claim for relief. We have reviewed the record and th e briefs filed by the parties, and we find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Schmidt v. Wells Fargo Home Mortgage , No. 3:11

- cv - 00059

- JRS (E.D. Va. Apr. 26, 2011)
. We dispense with oral argument bec ause the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
§ 1000.176 What issues must the bureau and the Tribe/Consortium address at negotiation meetings? The negotiation meetings referred to in § 1000.175 must address at a minimum the following: ( a ) The specific Tribe/Consortium proposal(s) and intentions;
( b ) Legal or program issues that the bureau or the Tribe/Consortium identify as concerns;
( c ) Options for negotiating programs and related budget amounts, including mutually agreeable options for developing alternative formats for presenting budget information to the Tribe/Consortium;
( d ) Dates for conducting and concluding negotiations;
( e ) Protocols for conducting negotiations;
( f ) Responsibility for preparation of a written summary of the discussions; and
( g ) Who will prepare an initial draft of the AFA.
EX-35.4
(logo) WELLS FARGO

Corporate Trust Services

MAC R1204-010
9062 Old Annapolis Road
Columbia, MD 21045

Tel: 410 884 2000
Fax: 410 715 2380

GS Mortgage Securities Corporation II
200 West Street
New York, New York 10282


RE: Annual Statement of Compliance for GS Mortgage Securities Corp. II
    Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2012-GC6

Per the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of February 1, 2012 (the
"Agreement"), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank,
N.A., as Trustee ("Wells Fargo"), hereby certifies as follows as of and for the
year ending December 31, 2013 (the "Reporting Period"):

(a) A review of Wells Fargo's activities during the Reporting Period and of its
performance under the Agreement has been made under such officer's supervision;
and

(b) To the best of such officer's knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo
has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material
respects throughout the Reporting Period.


March 10, 2014

/s/ Brian Smith
BRIAN SMITH
Vice President

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
### Disposal of uranium-mill effluent by well injection in the Grants area, Valencia County, New Mexico

By: S. W. West

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/pp386D

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 3**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 4**                            (pdf) 
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
`[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 140 Reported in House (RH)]






                                                  House Calendar No. 38
106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 140

                          [Report No. 106-95]

 Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 1376) to extend the tax 
benefits available with respect to services performed in a combat zone 
  to services performed in the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (Serbia/
      Montenegro) and certain other areas, and for other purposes.


_______________________________________________________________________


                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 14, 1999

   Mrs. Myrick, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION


 
 Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 1376) to extend the tax 
benefits available with respect to services performed in a combat zone 
  to services performed in the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (Serbia/
      Montenegro) and certain other areas, and for other purposes.

    Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it shall be in 
order without intervention of any point of order to consider in the 
House the bill (H.R. 1376) to extend the tax benefits available with 
respect to services performed in a combat zone to services performed in 
the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (Serbia/Montenegro) and certain 
other areas, and for other purposes. The bill shall be considered as 
read for amendment. The amendment recommended by the Committee on Ways 
and Means now printed in the bill shall be considered as adopted. The 
previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill, as 
amended, to final passage without intervening motion except: (1) one 
hour of debate on the bill, as amended, equally divided and controlled 
by the chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on Ways 
and Means; and (2) one motion to recommit with or without instructions.
                                     





                                                  House Calendar No. 38

106th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                              H. RES. 140

                          [Report No. 106-95]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 1376) to extend the tax 
benefits available with respect to services performed in a combat zone 
  to services performed in the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (Serbia/
      Montenegro) and certain other areas, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             April 14, 1999

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed`
§ 11.203 How are the clerks of the Court of Indian Offenses appointed and what are their duties? ( a ) Except as may otherwise be provided in a contract with the tribe occupying the Indian country over which the court has jurisdiction, the chief magistrate shall appoint a clerk of court for the Court of Indian Offenses within his or her jurisdiction, subject to the superintendent's approval.
( b ) The clerk shall render assistance to the court, to local law enforcement officers and to individual members of the tribe in the drafting of complaints, subpoenas, warrants, commitments, and other documents incidental to the functions of the court. The clerk shall also attend and keep a record of all proceedings of the court and manage all monies received by the court.
( c ) The clerk of court shall forward any monies received on judgments due to the person, agency, or corporation to which entitled, within 30 days unless directed otherwise by a magistrate of the Court of Indian Offenses.
§ 20.1 Liaison officers. ( a ) Each of the following shall appoint an officer to maintain liaison with the Office on matters relating to The United States Government Manual: ( 1 ) Agencies of the legislative and judicial branches.
( 2 ) Executive agencies that do not have a liaison officer designated under § 16.1 of this chapter or who wish to appoint a liaison officer for Manual matters other than the one designated under such § 16.1.
( 3 ) Quasi-official agencies represented in the Manual.
( 4 ) Any other agency that the Director believes should be included in the Manual.
( b ) Each liaison officer will insure agency compliance with part 9 of this chapter and this part 20.
[37 FR 23611, Nov. 4, 1972, as amended at 50 FR 12468, Mar. 28, 1985; 54 FR 9682, Mar. 7, 1989]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                          16,986
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,860,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,876,986
<PP&E>                                           3,998
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,972,755
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,057,865
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     10,750
<COMMON>                                        13,006
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,217,012
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,972,755
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               647,908
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               7,196
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (655,104)
<EPS-BASIC>                                  (0.013)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.013)



</TABLE>
REPORT ON ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION’S REGULATION AB SERVICING CRITERIA







For the calendar year ending December
31, 2012, National Tax Search, LLC has been a Tax Service Vendor for

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.(the “Servicer”).



National Tax Search, LLC (“NTS”)
is responsible for assessing compliance as of December 31, 2012 and for the period from January 1, 2012 through December 31, 2012
(the “Reporting Period”) with the servicing criteria set forth in Title 17, Section 229.1122(d) of the Code of Federal
Regulations (the “CFR”). NTS has used the servicing criteria communicated to NTS by the Servicer to assess compliance
with the applicable servicing criteria. Only servicing criteria 1122 (d) (l)(ii), 1122 (d)1(iv), 1122 (d)2(ii), 1122 (d)2(v), 1122(d)2(vi),
1122 (d)2(vii), 1122(d)(4)(xi), and 1122(d)(4)(xii) (the “Applicable Servicing Criteria”) are applicable to the activities
NTS performs with respect to the transactions covered by this report. NTS has determined that the remaining servicing criteria
set forth in Item 1122 (d) of the SEC Regulation AB are not applicable to the activities it performs with respect to the transactions
covered by this report. The transactions covered by this report include all tax payments made on behalf of the Servicer using NTS’s
TaxQ system (the “Platform Transactions”).



NTS, as a vendor, has assessed its compliance
with the Applicable Servicing Criteria for the Reporting Period and has concluded that the NTS has complied, in all material respects,
with the Applicable Servicing Criteria as of December 31, 2012 and for the Reporting Period with respect to the Platform Transactions
taken as a whole.



Plante & Moran, PLLC, an independent
registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report on the assessment of compliance with the Applicable Servicing
Criteria as of December 31, 2012 and for the Reporting Period as set forth in this assertion.



National Tax Search, LLC, as Vendor
to Servicer







/s/ Lori D. Eshoo

Lori D. Eshoo, President/CEO















|303 E. Wacker Drive, Suite 1040 | 
|------------------------------- | 
|Chicago, IL 60601              
|Telephone: (312) 233-6440      
|Facsimile: (312) 540-3770
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsBlade Heat Transfer Measurements and Prediction in a Transonic Turbine CascadeDetailed heat transfer measurements and predictions are given for a turbine rotor with 136 deg of turning and an axial chord of 12.7 cm. Data were obtained for inlet Reynolds numbers of 0.5 and 1.0 x 10(exp 6), for isentropic exit Mach numbers of 1.0 and 1.3, and for inlet turbulence intensities of 0.25% and 7.0%. Measurements were made in a linear cascade having a highly three-dimensional flow field resulting from thick inlet boundary layers. The purpose of the work is to provide benchmark quality data for three-dimensional CFD code and model verification. Data were obtained by a steady-state technique using a heated, isothermal blade. Heat fluxes were determined from a calibrated resistance layer in conjunction with a surface temperature measured by calibrated liquid crystals. The results show the effects of strong secondary vortical flows, laminar-to-turbulent transition, shock impingement, and increased inlet turbulence on the surface heat transfer.Document ID19990095794Acquisition SourceGlenn Research CenterDocument TypeReprint (Version printed in journal)AuthorsGiel, P. W.*(DYNACS Engineering Co., Inc. Brook Park, OH United States)*VanFossen, G. J.*(NASA Glenn Research Center Cleveland, OH United States)*Boyle, R. J.*(NASA Glenn Research Center Cleveland, OH United States)*Thurman, D. R.*(Army Research Lab. Cleveland, OH United States)*Civinskas, K. C.*(Army Research Lab. Cleveland, OH United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateAugust 1, 1999Subject CategoryFluid Mechanics And Heat TransferReport/Patent NumberE-11775ARL-TR-2029NAS 1.15:209296NASA/TM-1999-209296Meeting InformationMeeting: Gas Turbine and Aeroengine CongressLocation: Indianapolis, INCountry: United StatesStart Date: June 7, 1999End Date: June 10, 1999Sponsors:International Gas Turbine Inst.,American Society of Mechanical EngineersFunding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAS3-98008PROJECT: RTOP 523-26-13PROJECT: DA Proj. 1L1-61101-AH-45Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19990095794.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
No. 9979.

#### The State of Louisiana vs. James K. Darrow.

A motion for a new trial, unaccompanied by any bill of exceptions to tlie ruling thereon, will not be examined. Unless the record contains either a bill of exceptions, motion in arrest of judgment, assignment of errors, or error patent on its face, the judgment will not be disturbed.

APPEAL from the Criminal District Court for the Parish of Orleans. *Balter,*J.

*M. J. Oimningliam,*Attorney General, and *Lionel Adams,*District Attorney, for the State, Appellee.

*J, J. Foley*for Defendant and Appellant.

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Todd, J.

The defendant appeals from a sentence of one year’s *678imprisonment at hard labor, having been convicted of inflicting a wound less than mayhem.

Iiis only complaint here is that the trial judge refused to grant him a new trial. The motion, therefore, was founded on the separating of the jury after retiring to deliberate upon their verdict.

It suffices to say that no bill of exceptions was taken to the overruling of the motion. In the absence of such bill, containing the evidence or a statement of facts upon which the judge based his ruling, this Court is powerless to review the matter. State vs. Wire, 38 Ann. 685.

Judgment affirmed.
#### § 115.100 Osage Agency.

The provisions of this part do not apply to funds the deposit or expenditure of which is subject to the provisions of part 117 of this subchapter.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 98 Engrossed Amendment House (EAH)]

  1st Session

                                H.R. 98

_______________________________________________________________________

                               AMENDMENT

                                   TO

                           SENATE AMENDMENTS
                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                        April 12, 1999.

    Resolved, That the House agree to the amendments of the Senate to the bill 
(H.R. 98) entitled ``An Act to amend chapter 443 of title 49, United States 
Code, to extend the aviation war risk insurance program and to amend the 
Centennial of Flight Commemoration Act to make technical and other 
corrections'', with the following

                               AMENDMENT:

            At the end of the Senate amendment, add the 
      following:

    Page 2, line 3, strike [March] and insert: May.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**


**CERTIFICATION
      OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORTS**





Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of The Doe Run Resources
      Corporation (the ‘‘Company’’), does hereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge,
      that:





(a) The
      quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended January 31, 2006, of
      the
      Company as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
      (the “Form 10-Q/A”), fully complies with the


requirements
      of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
      and;





(b) The
      information contained in the Form 10-Q/A fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.








Date:
      October 19, 2006











By: /s/
      Theodore P. Fox, III


Theodore
      P. Fox, III


Chief
      Financial Officer


(Principal
      Financial Officer)
# **EXHIBIT32.1**

**CERTIFICATIONOF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORTS**

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, the undersigned officer of The Doe Run Resources Corporation (the ‘‘Company’’),does hereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge, that:

(a) The quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarterended July 31, 2006, of the Company as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Form 10-Q”), fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

(b) The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.

 

Date: September 14, 2006

 
| By:                                     | /s/ A. Bruce Neil |   |
|-----------------------------------------|-------------------|--------|
| A. Bruce Neil                           |
| President & Chief Executive Officer |
| (Principal Executive Officer)           |

 

----
### §129d. Disclosure to litigation support contractors

(a) Disclosure Authority.—An officer or employee of the Department of Defense may disclose sensitive information to a litigation support contractor if—

(1) the disclosure is for the sole purpose of providing litigation support to the Government in the form of administrative, technical, or professional services during or in anticipation of litigation; and

(2) under a contract with the Government, the litigation support contractor agrees to and acknowledges—

(A) that sensitive information furnished will be accessed and used only for the purposes stated in the relevant contract;

(B) that the contractor will take all precautions necessary to prevent disclosure of the sensitive information provided to the contractor;

(C) that such sensitive information provided to the contractor under the authority of this section shall not be used by the contractor to compete against a third party for Government or non-Government contracts; and

(D) that the violation of subparagraph (A), (B), or (C) is a basis for the Government to terminate the litigation support contract of the contractor.

(b) Definitions.—In this section:

(1) The term "litigation support contractor" means a contractor (including an expert or technical consultant) under contract with the Department of Defense to provide litigation support.

(2) The term "sensitive information" means confidential commercial, financial, or proprietary information, technical data, or other privileged information.

(Added Pub. L. 112–81, div. A, title VIII, §802(a)(1), Dec. 31, 2011, 125 Stat. 1484.)