alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             NOV-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-2000
<CASH>                                           17164
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    77352
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (601)
<INVENTORY>                                     139852
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 33869
<PP&E>                                          385709
<DEPRECIATION>                                (116009)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  678598
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           114156
<BONDS>                                         301060
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                        4940
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    678598
<SALES>                                         197599
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                197599
<CGS>                                           175361
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   193204
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   576
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    24
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               15284
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (7874)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      1534
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (9408)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (9408)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
#### § 11.705 Removal of executor or administrator.

The Court of Indian Offenses may order the executor or administrator to show cause why he or she should not be discharged, and may discharge the executor or administrator for failure, neglect or improper performance of his or her duties.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 148 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 148

 Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives with respect to 
  the tragic shooting at Columbine High School in Littleton, Colorado.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 26, 1999

 Mr. Tancredo (for himself, Mr. Hefley, Mr. McInnis, Ms. DeGette, Mr. 
     Schaffer, and Mr. Udall of Colorado) submitted the following 
 resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Education and the 
                               Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives with respect to 
  the tragic shooting at Columbine High School in Littleton, Colorado.

Whereas on April 20, 1999, two armed gunmen opened fire at Columbine High School 
        in Littleton, Colorado, killing 13 students and teachers and wounding 
        more than 20 students and teachers;
Whereas this act of brutal violence is regarded as the deadliest school massacre 
        in the history of the United States of America; and
Whereas local, State, and Federal law enforcement personnel performed their 
        duties admirably in the six hour siege and risked their lives for the 
        safety of the students, faculty, and staff at Columbine High School: 
        Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) condemns, in the strongest possible terms, the heinous 
        atrocities which occurred at Columbine High School in 
        Littleton, Colorado;
            (2) offers its condolences to the families, friends, and 
        loved ones of those who were killed at Columbine High School 
        and expresses its hope for the rapid and complete recovery of 
        those wounded in the shooting;
            (3) applauds the hard work and dedication exhibited by the 
        hundreds of local, State, and Federal law enforcement officials 
        and the others who offered their support and assistance; and
            (4) encourages the American people to engage in a national 
        dialogue on preventing school violence.
                                 <all>
```
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

# National Training Center Hosts Japanese Unit for Their First Decisive Action Rotation

By Mr. Gustavo Bahena (Irwin)U.S. Navy

                FORT IRWIN, Calif.  –              NTC Hosts Japanese Unit Article

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT
#### § 160.4 Prompt payment of irrigation charges by lessees.

Superintendents will also see that irrigation charges are promptly paid by lessees, and where such charges are not so paid take appropriate and prompt action for their collection. Such unpaid charges are a lien against the land, and accordingly any failure on the part of the superintendents to collect same increases the obligation against the land.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Be th Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 30, 2015

p0930 

# Order

Clerk September 30, 2015

150692

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 150692

COA: 323617

St Joseph CC: 09

- 015639

- FC

MARSHA ANN SPRINGER

, Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 19, 2014

order of the Court of Appeals is considered a nd, pursuant to MCR 7.305(H)(1), in lieu of

granting leave to appeal, we VACATE in part the St. Joseph Circuit Court order of July

24, 2014 denying the defendant’s motion for relief from judgment. The issue of

entrapment by estoppel was not addressed in t he circuit court or by the Court of Appeals

in the defendant’s appeal of right. Therefore, MCR 6.508(D)(2) does not apply. We

REMAND this case to the trial court to hold a hearing on the defendant’s ineffective

assistance of counsel arguments pertaining to the issue of entrapment by estoppel. We

further ORDER the St. Joseph Circuit Court, in accord with Administrative Order 2003

- 03, to determine whether the defendant is indigent and, if so, to appoint counsel to

represent the defendant at the hearing. I n all other respects, leave to appeal is DENIED,

because the defendant has failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief

under MCR 6.508(D).
FTC Consumer Alert

Federal Trade Commission Bureau of Consumer Protection Office of Consumer & Business Education

1-877-FTC-HELP FOR THE CONSUMER

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION ftc.gov

February 2006

Travel Tips: How to Gear Up for a Great Trip

Whether you’re off to see the sights, ski the slopes, or sunbathe on the sand, it pays to be an 

informed travel shopper. To help you avoid vacation frustration, the Federal Trade Commission 

(FTC), the nation’s consumer protection agency, offers these tips.

 Buy your vacation package from a business you have confidence in. Ask family and friends 

to recommend a company with a good track record. Think twice if you can’t get a person on 

the phone to answer your questions or if the ad doesn’t give the company’s street address. 

Contact the state Attorney General, consumer protection agency and Better Business Bureau 

where you live and where the company is based to see if there is a history of complaints on 

file.

 Be on the alert for the telltale signs of a travel scam. Unsolicited faxes or emails for deeply 

discounted travel packages promise the world. But the fraudsters behind these offers will leave 

you at the gate.

 Verify and clarify. Call to verify your reservations and arrangements. Get the details behind 

vague promises that you’ll be staying at a “five-star” resort or sailing on a “luxury” cruise 

ship. When you have the names, addresses and telephone numbers of the airlines, car rental 

companies, and hotels you’ll be using, confirm all arrangements for yourself. 

 Put it on paper. Get the details of your vacation in writing. Get a copy of the company’s 

cancellation and refund policies, and ask “What if...?” Consider whether some form of travel 

cancellation insurance may be appropriate. 

 Use a credit card to make your purchase. If you don’t get what you paid for, you may be 

able to dispute the charges with your credit card company. However, don’t give your account 

number to any business until you’ve verified that it is reputable.

 Avoid a travel club flub. Ask questions before joining a travel club. Sometimes, a “free trial” 

membership can result in unauthorized charges on your credit card. Find out what you’ll get 

for your money and how you can cancel. 

 Won a “free” vacation? Not so fast. Scam artists may tell you you’ve won a “free” vacation, 

but then claim to need your credit card number for “verification.” Tell ‘em to take a hike. If 

the promotion is legit, you never need to pay for a prize.

The FTC works for the consumer to prevent fraudulent, deceptive and unfair business practices 

in the marketplace and to provide information to help consumers spot, stop, and avoid them. To 

file a complaint or to get free information on consumer issues, visit www.ftc.gov or call toll-free, 

1-877-FTC-HELP (1-877-382-4357); TTY: 1-866-653-4261. The FTC enters Internet, telemarketing, 

identity theft, and other fraud-related complaints into Consumer Sentinel, a secure online database 

available to hundreds of civil and criminal law enforcement agencies in the U.S. and abroad.
### §1042. Copy of certificate of service

A fee for a copy of a certificate showing service in the armed forces may not be charged to—

(1) a person discharged or released from the armed forces honorably or under honorable conditions;

(2) the next of kin of the person; or

(3) a legal representative of the person.

(Added Pub. L. 97–258, §2(b)(2)(B), Sept. 13, 1982, 96 Stat. 1052.)

| Revised section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1042 | 31:483b. | June 19, 1956, ch. 409, 70 Stat. 297. |

The words "armed forces" are substituted for "Army, Navy, Air Force, Marine Corps, or Coast Guard" because of 10:101(4). The words "honorably or" are added for consistency with 10:1040.
Exhibit 31.3



CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE
OFFICER OF GLOBAL MEDICAL REIT INC.



PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002



I, David A. Young, Chief Executive Officer
of Global Medical REIT Inc., certify that:



|1. | I have reviewed Amendments No. 1 and No. 2 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016 of Global Medical REIT Inc.; and                                                                                                                                                          
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|2. | Based on my knowledge, these reports do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by these reports.



|      |            
|----- | -----------
|      |            
|Date: | May 8, 2017
|      |            
|      |
EXHIBIT 32

Section 1350 Certifications

                          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                           18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                           AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Report of Bravo! Foods International, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2005 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Roy G. Warren, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C., Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

                                       /S/ Roy G. Warren
                                       ------------------------------------
                                       Roy G. Warren
                                       Chief Executive Officer

November 14, 2005


                          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                           18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                           AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Report of Bravo! Foods International, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2005 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Tommy E. Kee, Chief Accounting Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C., Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

November 14, 2005                      /S/  Tommy E. Kee
                                       ------------------------------------
                                       Tommy E. Kee
                                       Chief Accounting Officer


<PAGE>  38
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 32 (Wednesday, February 16, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 9020]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-3531]



[[Page 9020]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention


Disease, Disability, and Injury Prevention and Control; Special 
Emphasis Panel (SEP): Ability of Individual and Integrated Tick 
Management (ITM) Technologies To Reduce the Entomological Risk of Lyme 
Disease, Funding Opportunity Announcement (FOA) CK11-005, Initial 
Review

    In accordance with Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), the Centers for Disease Control and 
Prevention (CDC) announces the aforementioned meeting:
    Time and Date: 12 p.m.-2 p.m., May 10, 2011 (Closed).
    Place: Teleconference.
    Status: The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with 
provisions set forth in Section 552b(c)(4) and (6), Title 5 U.S.C., and 
the Determination of the Director, Management Analysis and Services 
Office, CDC, pursuant to Public Law 92-463.
    Matters To Be Discussed: The meeting will include the initial 
review, discussion, and evaluation of applications received in response 
to ``Ability of Individual and Integrated Tick Management (ITM) 
Technologies To Reduce the Entomological Risk of Lyme Disease, FOA 
CK11-005.''
    Contact Person for More Information: Amy Yang, PhD, Scientific 
Review Officer, CDC, 1600 Clifton Road, NE., Mailstop E60, Atlanta, 
Georgia 30333, Telephone: (404) 498-2733.
    The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, has been 
delegated the authority to sign Federal Register notices pertaining to 
announcements of meetings and other committee management activities, 
for both the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Agency 
for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.

    Dated: February 4, 2011.
Elaine L. Baker,
Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for Disease 
Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2011-3531 Filed 2-15-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
### Geology and ore deposits of the Chicago Creek area, Clear Creek County, Colorado

By: J. E. HarrisonJ. D. Wells

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/pp319

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 3**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 4**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 5**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 6**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 7**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 8**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 9**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 10**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 11**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 12**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 13**                            (pdf) 
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
#### Sealtest Central Division-Omaha of Kraftco Corporation, appellee, v. Douglas County Board of Equalization et al., appellants.

229 N. W. 2d 545

Filed May 22, 1975.

No. 39744.

Donald L. Knowles and William T. Ginsburg, for appellant.

Charles S. Reed, for appellee.

*810Heard before White, C. J., Spencer, Boslaugh, McCown, Newton, Clinton, and Brodkey, JJ.

Newton, J.

This is an action wherein the defendants allege that plaintiff failed to list part of its personal property for taxation for the years 1970, 1971, and 1972. Taxes for the current year 1973 were paid. Defendants increased assessments and assessed penalties for the years mentioned. Summary judgment was entered for plaintiff setting aside the additional assessments and penalties. That judgment is affirmed.

The question presented is whether plaintiff omitted listing a part of its personal property or simply undervalued it for prior years. Under section 77-412, R. R. S. 1943, in the case of omitted property the action taken by the Douglas County assessor and board of equalization is authorized but not in regard to undervalued property for prior years.

In the answer and cross-petition of the defendants it is alleged that the assessments for the 3 years in question “did not reflect the actual value of such personal property and should be corrected and amended to reflect such actual value.” No objections were made in any of the years in question to the tax returns of plaintiff and taxes were levied and paid on the basis of the returns made. The property taxed is listed in each return as “Furniture, Fixtures, Mach., Tools & Equip.” It was not itemized.but listed in a lump sum. Neither the pleadings nor the record indicate that any specific items were omitted. When property is listed in bulk in this manner it is apparent that all the property within the classification mentioned has been listed though possibly undervalued.

In order to sustain an addition of property by tax assessors to a return as omitted property it must appear that specific items were added which were not assessed in the original assessment. In Star Iron & Steel Co. v. *811Pierce County, 5 Wash. App. 515, 488 P. 2d 776, it is held: Where county’s own tax form called for listings of value of classes of personal property, rather than individual items of property, value for which was included by corporate taxpayer as part of value of class of things to which they belonged, county could not be heard to say that individual items were omitted from list, and such items, rather than omitted property, constituted omitted value of property listed which could not be reassessed. See, also, Kentucky Tax Commission v. Airlene Gas Co. (Ky. App.), 328 S. W. 2d 832; Hunt v. District of Columbia, 108 F. 2d 10; State v. Thompson-Parker Lumber Co., 173 Okla. 22, 46 P. 2d 494.

In view of the complete failure of the taxing authorities to list or point out any specific items of property which were omitted from plaintiff’s tax returns, the judgment of the District Court must be affirmed.

Affirmed.