alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 115 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 115

  Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that a postage 
stamp should be issued recognizing the Veterans of Foreign Wars of the 
                             United States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 16, 1999

Mr. Hill of Indiana (for himself, Mr. Condit, Mr. Reyes, Mr. Shows, Mr. 
McGovern, Mr. LaTourette, Mr. Holden, Ms. Danner, Mr. Engel, Mr. Payne, 
 Mr. Frank of Massachusetts, Mr. Leach, Mr. Dingell, Mr. Baldacci, Ms. 
   DeLauro, Mr. Maloney of Connecticut, Mr. Meehan, Mr. LaHood, Mr. 
Berman, Mr. Filner, Ms. Carson, Mr. Spratt, Mr. Clement, Mr. Frost, Ms. 
  Kilpatrick, and Mr. Gutierrez) submitted the following resolution; 
        which was referred to the Committee on Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that a postage 
stamp should be issued recognizing the Veterans of Foreign Wars of the 
                             United States.

Whereas the Nation owes a deep debt to all those who have served our country as 
        members of the Armed Services;
Whereas the Veterans of Foreign Wars of the United States has represented the 
        Nation's veterans for the past 100 years; and
Whereas 1999 is the 100th anniversary of the organization of the Veterans of 
        Foreign Wars of the United States: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Representatives 
that--
            (1) the United States Postal Service should issue a postage 
        stamp commemorating the 100th anniversary of the Veterans of 
        Foreign Wars of the United States; and
            (2) the Citizens' Stamp Advisory Committee should recommend 
        to the Postmaster General that such a postage stamp be issued.
                                 <all>
```
§ 1187.21 How will OIED evaluate the proposed location of the business incubator? In evaluating the proposed location of the business incubator, OIED will: ( a ) Consider the program goal of achieving broad geographic distribution of business incubators; and
( b ) Give priority to eligible applicants that will provide business incubation services on or near the reservation of the one or more communities that were described in the application, except that OIED may give priority to an eligible applicant that is not located on or near the reservation of the one or more communities that were described in the application if OIED determines that: ( 1 ) The location of the business incubator will not prevent the eligible applicant from providing quality business incubation services to Native businesses and Native entrepreneurs from the one or more reservation communities to be served; and
( 2 ) Siting the business incubator in the identified location will serve the interests of the one or more reservation communities to be served.
§ 12.4 Weekly Compilation of Presidential Documents. ( a ) Copies of the Weekly Compilation of Presidential Documents shall be made available to the following without charge: ( 1 ) *Members of Congress.* Each Senator and each Member of the House of Representatives will be provided with the number of copies needed for official use based on a written request to the Director of the Federal Register.
( 2 ) *Congressional committees.* Each committee of the Senate and the House of Representatives will be provided with the number of copies needed for official use based on a written request from the chairperson, or authorized delegate, to the Director of the Federal Register.
( 3 ) *Supreme Court.* The Supreme Court will be provided with the number of copies needed for official use based on a written request to the Director of the Federal Register.
( 4 ) *Other courts.* Other constitutional and legislative courts of the United States will be provided with the number of copies needed for official use based on a written request from the Director of the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts, or authorized delegate, to the Director of the Federal Register.
( 5 ) *Executive agencies.* Each Federal executive agency will be provided with the number of copies needed for official use based on a written request from the agency Federal Register authorizing officer, or the alternate designated under § 16.1 of this chapter, to the Director of the Federal Register.
( b ) Legislative, judicial, and executive agencies of the Federal Government may obtain additional copies of selected issues of the Weekly Compilation of Presidential Documents, at cost, for official use, by submission, before the press run, of a printing and binding requisition to the Government Printing Office on a Standard Form 1.
( c ) After the press run, each request for extra copies of selected issues must be addressed to the Superintendent of Documents, to be paid for by the agency making the request.
#### § 1000.405 Are AFA funds non-Federal funds for the purpose of meeting matching requirements?

Yes, self-governance AFA funds can be treated as non-Federal funding for the purpose of meeting matching requirements under Federal law.
Free Electronic Credit Monitoring: Active duty military and members of the National Guard have a right to

free electronic credit monitoring. That means you’ll be notified any time there are significant changes to your credit, like

new accounts, address changes, changes to credit limits, or negative information. To sign up, contact each of the three

credit bureaus. 

Credit Tools for Active Duty Military

Are you a servicemember looking for ways to protect 

your identity? Here are some options to consider:

Fraud Alert

Available to anyone who is or 

suspects they may be aected 

by identity theft

Makes lenders verify your 

identity before granting

new credit

Free

Lasts one year

Contact one of the three credit 

bureaus. That one must tell the 

other two.

Credit Freeze

Available to anyone 

Restricts access to your 

credit report to help 

prevent identity theft

Free

Lasts until you lift it

Contact all three credit 

bureaus to place or lift 

the freeze. 

Active Duty Alert

Only available to active duty servicemembers

who are deployed

Tells lenders to verify your identity before extending 

new credit

Free

Lasts one year, but can be extended if still deployed

Contact one of the three credit bureaus. That one

must tell the other two. Added benefit: Credit bureaus 

take your name o their marketing lists for prescreened 

credit oers for two years – unless you ask them to add 

you back on.
How do I contact the credit bureaus?

Equifax Equifax.com/personal/credit-report-services 

800-685-1111

Experian Experian.com/help 

888-EXPERIAN (888-397-3742)

TransUnion TransUnion.com/credit-help 

888-909-8872

If you want a fraud alert, credit freeze, active duty alert, 

or free electronic credit monitoring, here’s where to go: 

Visit MilitaryConsumer.gov, 

your tool for financial 

readiness.

Follow us:

@MilitaryConsumer

@MilConsumer
#### James Bailey et al., Respondents, v Our Lady of Lourdes Roman Catholic Church Society of Bemus Point, Appellant.

[823 NYS2d 747]

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Chautauqua County (Paula L. Feroleto, J.), entered January 12, 2006 in a personal injury action. The order, among other things, denied defendant’s motion for partial summary judgment and granted plaintiffs’ cross motion for partial summary judgment on liability on the Labor Law § 240 (1) cause of action.

Now, upon reading and filing the stipulation to withdraw and discontinue appeal signed by the attorneys for the parties on August 28, 2006,

It is hereby ordered that said appeal be and the same hereby is unanimously dismissed without costs upon stipulation. Present—Hurlbutt, A.PJ., Gorski, Smith and Centra, JJ.
§ 1000.272 Do Tribes/Consortia need to be aware of areas which FTCA does not cover? Yes, there are claims against Self-Governance Tribes/Consortia which are not covered by FTCA, claims which may not be pursued under FTCA, and remedies that are excluded by FTCA. The following general guidance is not intended as a definitive description of coverage, which is subject to review by the Department of Justice and the courts on a case-by-case basis. ( a ) What claims are expressly barred by FTCA and therefore may not be made against the United States, a Tribe or Consortium? Any claim under 28 U.S.C. 2680, including claims arising out of assault, battery, false imprisonment, false arrest, malicious prosecution, abuse of process, libel, slander, misrepresentation, deceit, or interference with contract rights, unless otherwise authorized by 28 U.S.C. 2680(h).
( b ) What claims may not be pursued under FTCA? ( 1 ) Claims against subcontractors arising out of the performance of subcontracts with a Self-Governance Tribe/Consortium;
( 2 ) Claims for on-the-job injuries which are covered by workmen's compensation;
( 3 ) Claims for breach of contract rather than tort claims; or
( 4 ) Claims resulting from activities performed by an employee which are outside the scope of employment.
( c ) What remedies are expressly excluded by FTCA and therefore are barred? ( 1 ) Punitive damages, unless otherwise authorized by 28 U.S.C. 2674; and
( 2 ) Other remedies not permitted under applicable state law.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
MARIUSZ BUCHNA; JULITA BUCHNA, Plaintiffs - Appellants,
v. BANK OF AMERICA, NA; BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON CORPORATION; MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS INCORPORATED, Defendants - Appellees. No. 10-17651 D.C. No. 2:10-cv-00418-MHM
MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Mary H. MURGUIA, District Judge, Presiding Argued and Submitted June 15, 2012 San Francisco, California Before: HUG, RAWLINSON, and IKUTA, Circuit Judges. Mariusz and Julita Buchna appeal the district court’s dismissal of their action against Bank of America, N.A., Mort gage Electronic Registration Systems 

# FILED
JUL 11 2012 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 Inc. (MERS), and Bank of New York Mell on Corporation. Because the parties are familiar with the factual and procedural hist ory of this case, we need not recount it here. We have jurisdiction unde r 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm. The Buchnas argue that the note and deed of trust were split, rendering the non-judicial foreclosure provisions in the deed of trust unenforceable. That argument fails to state a claim because it is based on nothing more than conclusory speculation that the parties exercising pow er under the deed of trust are not the note holder or agents of the note holder. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 8; Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly , 550 U.S. 544, 555 (2007); Cervantes v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. , 656 F.3d 1034, 1044 (9th Cir. 2011). The Buchnas do not dispute that they are in default under the deed of trust and have alleged no reason to dispute the trustee’s right to foreclose. See Hogan v. Wash. Mut. Bank, N.A. , 277 P.3d 781, 784 (Ariz. 2012) (en banc). The Buchnas’ argumen t that the beneficiary was required to prove ownership of the note before instituting a non-judicial foreclosure proceeding also fails to state a claim. Id. at 783–84. The Buchnas argue that defendants-appellees are not permitted to enforce the power of sale provision in the deed of trust because they are not persons entitled to enforce a negotiable instrument under § 47-3301 of Arizona’s Uniform Commercial Code. That argument fails to state a claim because Arizona law does3 “not require compliance with the UCC be fore a trustee commences a non-judicial foreclosure.” Id. at 783. The Buchnas’ argument based on their contention that MERS is not a valid beneficiary also fails to state a claim. See Cervantes , 656 F.3d at 1044. We reject the remainder of the Buchna s’ arguments for the reasons stated by the district court. The district court did not err in entering judgment against the Buchnas, and therefore implicitly denying leave to ame nd their complaint, because amendment would have been futile. See Gardner v. Martino , 563 F.3d 981, 990 (9th Cir. 2009). AFFIRMED
.
#### § 1000.31 May a Tribe/Consortium be selected to negotiate an AFA under section 403(c) without negotiating an AFA under section 403(b)(1) and/or section 403(b)(2)?

No, section 403(c) of the Act states that any programs of special geographic, cultural, or historical significance to the Tribe/Consortium must be included in AFAs negotiated under section 403(a) and/or section 403(b). A Tribe may be selected to negotiate an AFA under section 403(c) at the same time that it negotiates an AFA under section 403(b)(1) and/or section 403(b)(2).
### SUBCHAPTER I—GENERAL

Sec.
3741.
Definitions.
3742.
Adjustment of threshold amount of covered contract.
3743.
Effect of submission of unallowable costs.
3744.
Specific costs not allowable.
3745.
Required regulations.
3746.
Applicability of regulations to subcontractors.
3747.
Contractor certification.
3748.
Penalties for submission of cost known as not allowable.
3749.
Burden of proof on contractor.
3750.
Proceeding costs not allowable.
### §1110a. Notification of certain individuals regarding options for enrollment under Medicare part B

(a) In General.—(1) As soon as practicable, the Secretary of Defense shall notify each individual described in subsection (b)—

(A) that the individual is no longer eligible for health care benefits under the TRICARE program under this chapter; and

(B) of options available for enrollment of the individual in the supplementary medical insurance program under part B of title XVIII of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395j et seq.).

(2) In carrying out this subsection, the Secretary of Defense shall—

(A) establish procedures for identifying individuals described in subsection (b); and

(B) consult with the Secretary of Health and Human Services to accurately identify and notify such individuals.

(b) Individuals Described.—An individual described in this subsection is an individual who is—

(1) a covered beneficiary;

(2) entitled to benefits under part A of title XVIII of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395c) under section 226(b) or section 226A of such Act (42 U.S.C. 426(b) and 426–1); and

(3) eligible to enroll in the supplementary medical insurance program under part B of such title (42 U.S.C. 1395j et seq.).

(Added Pub. L. 111–84, div. A, title VII, §707(a), Oct. 28, 2009, 123 Stat. 2376.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Social Security Act, referred to in subsecs. (a)(1)(B) and (b)(2), (3), is act Aug. 14, 1935, ch. 531, 49 Stat. 620. Parts A and B of title XVIII of the Act are classified generally to parts A (§1395c et seq.) and B (§1395j et seq.), respectively, of subchapter XVIII of chapter 7 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see section 1305 of Title 42 and Tables.
#### State of Nebraska, appellee, v. Samuel Dennis Cordell, appellant.

228 N. W. 2d 273

Filed April 24, 1975.

No. 39561.

Padley & Dudden, for appellant.

Paul L. Douglas, Attorney General, and Steven C. Smith, for appellee.

Heard before White, C. J., Spencer, Boslaugh, Mc-Cown, Newton, Clinton, and Brodkey, JJ.

Newton, J.

Defendant was charged with rape, assault with intent to rape, and kidnapping. Pursuant to a plea bargain he plead guilty to the assault charge. Thereafter, at de*563fendant’s request, he was examined for the purpose of ascertaining if he was a sexual sociopath. He was found to be a sexual sociopath and committed for an indefinite period. Later he was found to be no longer a sexual sociopath and received a sentence of 5 to 8 years on the original charge with credit given for the time of incarceration including that as a sexual sociopath.

Defendant assigns as error proceedings connected with his commitment as a sexual sociopath, alleged defects in his arraignment, and excessiveness of the sentence. We affirm the judgment of the District Court.

Examination of the record reveals that defendant’s complaints in regard to his arraignment and commitment as a sexual sociopath are groundless and frivolous. Furthermore, no appeal was taken from the sexual sociopath proceeding and defendant has failed to file a motion for new trial. “In order to obtain a review of alleged errors occurring during the trial, such errors must be pointed out to the trial court in a motion for a new trial and a ruling obtained thereon.” State v. Ryan, 188 Neb. 381, 196 N. W. 2d 919.

The sentence is well within that provided by statute and is not excessive.

The judgment of the District Court is affirmed.

Affirmed.
H. Res. 1

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

January 6, 1999.

Resolved, That Jeffrey J. Trandahl of the Commonwealth of Virginia be, and is hereby, chosen Clerk of the

House of Representatives;

That Wilson S. Livingood of the Commonwealth of Virginia be, and is hereby, chosen Sergeant at Arms of the

House of Representatives;

That James M. Eagen, III, of the Commonwealth of

Pennsylvania, be, and is hereby, chosen Chief Administrative

Officer of the House of Representatives; and

That Reverend James David Ford of the Commonwealth

of Virginia be, and is hereby, chosen Chaplain of the House

of Representatives.

Attest:

Clerk.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the Government in the Sunshine Act, Public Law 94-409, that the Securities and Exchange Commission will hold a Closed Meeting on Thursday, February 17, 2011 at 1:30 p.m.

Commissioners, Counsel to the Commissioners, the Secretary to the Commission, and recording secretaries will attend the Closed Meeting. Certain staff members who have an interest in the matters also may be present.

The General Counsel of the Commission, or his designee, has certified that, in his opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(3), (5), (7), 9(B) and (10) and 17 CFR 200.402(a)(3), (5), (7), 9(ii) and (10), permit consideration of the scheduled matters at the Closed Meeting.

Commissioner Paredes, as duty officer, voted to consider the items listed for the Closed Meeting in a closed session.

The subject matter of the Closed Meeting scheduled for Thursday, February 17, 2011 will be:

A litigation matter;

Institution and settlement of injunctive actions;

Institution and settlement of administrative proceedings; and

Other matters relating to enforcement proceedings.

At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in the scheduling of meeting items.

For further information and to ascertain what, if any, matters have been added, deleted or postponed, please contact:

The Office of the Secretary at (202) 551-5400.

Dated: February 10, 2011.

Elizabeth M. Murphy, 

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2011-3451 Filed 2-11-11; 11:15 am]

BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
### §1453. Recovery of amounts erroneously paid

(a) Recovery.—In addition to any other method of recovery provided by law, the Secretary concerned may authorize the recovery of any amount erroneously paid to a person under this subchapter by deduction from later payments to that person.

(b) Authority To Waive Recovery.—Recovery of an amount erroneously paid to a person under this subchapter is not required if, in the judgment of the Secretary concerned—

(1) there has been no fault by the person to whom the amount was erroneously paid; and

(2) recovery of such amount would be contrary to the purposes of this subchapter or against equity and good conscience.

(Added Pub. L. 92–425, §1(3), Sept. 21, 1972, 86 Stat. 710; amended Pub. L. 104–201, div. A, title VI, §634, Sept. 23, 1996, 110 Stat. 2577; Pub. L. 104–316, title I, §105(a), Oct. 19, 1996, 110 Stat. 3830.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1996—Pub. L. 104–201 substituted "amounts" for "annuity" in section catchline and amended text generally. Prior to amendment, text read as follows: "In addition to other methods of recovery provided by law, the Secretary concerned may authorize the recovery, by deduction from later payments to a person, of any amount erroneously paid to him under this subchapter. However, recovery is not required if, in the judgment of the Secretary concerned and the Comptroller General, there has been no fault by the person to whom the amount was erroneously paid and recovery would be contrary to the purposes of this subchapter or against equity and good conscience."

Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 104–316 struck out "and the Comptroller General" after "judgment of the Secretary concerned" in introductory provisions.
§ 11.911 Appeal. ( a ) For purposes of appeal, a record of the proceedings shall be made available to the minor and parents, guardian or custodian. Costs of obtaining the record shall be paid by the party seeking the appeal.
( b ) Any party to a children's court hearing may appeal a final order or disposition of the case by filing a written notice of appeal with the children's court within 30 days of the final order of disposition.
( c ) No decree or disposition of a hearing shall be stayed by such appeal.
( d ) All appeals shall be conducted in accordance with this part.
§ 51.7 What publications are eligible? ( a ) A publication is eligible for incorporation by reference under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) if it— ( 1 ) Conforms to the policy stated in § 51.1;
( 2 ) ( i ) Is published data, criteria, standards, specifications, techniques, illustrations, or similar material; and
( ii ) Does not detract from the usefulness of the Federal Register publication system; and
( 3 ) Is reasonably available to and usable by the class of persons affected. In determining whether a publication is usable, the Director will consider— ( i ) The completeness and ease of handling of the publication; and
( ii ) Whether it is bound, numbered, and organized, as applicable.
( b ) The Director will assume that a publication produced by the same agency that is seeking its approval is inappropriate for incorporation by reference. A publication produced by the agency may be approved, if, in the judgment of the Director, it meets the requirements of paragraph (a) and possesses other unique or highly unusual qualities. A publication may be approved if it cannot be printed using the Federal Register/Code of Federal Regulations printing system.
( c ) The following materials are not appropriate for incorporation by reference: ( 1 ) Material published previously in the Federal Register.
( 2 ) Material published in the *United States Code.*
[47 FR 34108, Aug. 6, 1982, as amended at 79 FR 66278, Nov. 7, 2014]