alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 162.467 What will BIA do if the lessee does not cure a violation of a business lease on time? ( a ) If the lessee does not cure a violation of a business lease within the required time period, or provide adequate proof of payment as required in the notice of violation, we will consult with the tribe for tribal land or, where feasible, with Indian landowners for individually owned Indian land, and determine whether: ( 1 ) We should cancel the lease;
( 2 ) The Indian landowners wish to invoke any remedies available to them under the lease;
( 3 ) We should invoke other remedies available under the lease or applicable law, including collection on any available performance bond or, for failure to pay compensation, referral of the debt to the Department of the Treasury for collection; or
( 4 ) The lessee should be granted additional time in which to cure the violation.
( b ) Following consultation with the tribe for tribal land or, where feasible, with Indian landowners for individually owned Indian land, we may take action to recover unpaid compensation and any associated late payment charges. ( 1 ) We do not have to cancel the lease or give any further notice to the lessee before taking action to recover unpaid compensation.
( 2 ) We may still take action to recover any unpaid compensation if we cancel the lease.
( c ) If we decide to cancel the lease, we will send the lessee and any surety and mortgagee a cancellation letter by certified mail, return receipt requested, within 5 business days of our decision. We will send a copy of the cancellation letter to the tribe for tribal land, and will provide Indian landowners for individually owned Indian land with actual or constructive notice of the cancellation. The cancellation letter will: ( 1 ) Explain the grounds for cancellation;
( 2 ) If applicable, notify the lessee of the amount of any unpaid compensation or late payment charges due under the lease;
( 3 ) Notify the lessee of the lessee's right to appeal under part 2 of this chapter, including the possibility that the official to whom the appeal is made may require the lessee to post an appeal bond;
( 4 ) Order the lessee to vacate the property within 31 days of the date of receipt of the cancellation letter, if an appeal is not filed by that time; and
( 5 ) Order the lessee to take any other action BIA deems necessary to protect the Indian landowners.
( d ) We may invoke any other remedies available to us under the lease, including collecting on any available performance bond, and the Indian landowners may pursue any available remedies under tribal law.
### SUBCHAPTER I—DEFENSE-WIDE INTELLIGENCE PERSONNEL POLICY

Sec.
1601.
Civilian intelligence personnel: general authority to establish excepted positions, appoint personnel, and fix rates of pay.
1602.
Basic pay.
1603.
Additional compensation, incentives, and allowances.
[1604.
Repealed.]
1605.
Benefits for certain employees assigned outside the United States.
1606.
Defense Intelligence Senior Executive Service.
1607.
Intelligence Senior Level positions.
1608.
Time-limited appointments.
1609.
Termination of defense intelligence employees.
1610.
Reductions and other adjustments in force.
1611.
Postemployment assistance: certain terminated intelligence employees.
1612.
Merit system principles and civil service protections: applicability.
1613.
Miscellaneous provisions.
1614.
Definitions.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**1996**—Pub. L. 104–201, div. A, title XVI, §1632(a)(3), Sept. 23, 1996, 110 Stat. 2745, added table of sections for subchapter and struck out former table of sections consisting of items 1601 "Defense Intelligence Senior Executive Service", 1602 "Defense Intelligence Agency merit pay system", 1603 "Limit on pay", 1604 "Civilian personnel management", 1605 "Benefits for certain employees of the Defense Intelligence Agency", 1606 "Uniform allowance: civilian employees", and 1608 "Financial assistance to certain employees in acquisition of critical skills".

**1994**—Pub. L. 103–359, title V, §501(b)(1)(A), Oct. 14, 1994, 108 Stat. 3428, amended chapter heading generally, inserting "AND CENTRAL IMAGERY OFFICE".

**1989**—Pub. L. 101–193, title V, §507(a)(2), Nov. 30, 1989, 103 Stat. 1710, added item 1608.

**1987**—Pub. L. 100–178, title VI, §601(b), Dec. 2, 1987, 101 Stat. 1015, added item 1606.

**1985**—Pub. L. 99–145, title XIII, §1302(a)(2), Nov. 8, 1985, 99 Stat. 737, redesignated item 192 of chapter 8 of this title as item 1605 and transferred it to this chapter.

**1984**—Pub. L. 98–618, title V, §501(b), Nov. 8, 1984, 98 Stat. 3302, added item 1604.
AFS-13-349-E

June 06, 2013

 Exemption No. 10787

 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2013-0395

Ms. Euna Kim

Parent of Hannah Kang

1813 Koehling Road

Northbrook, IL 60062

Dear Ms. Kim:

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your request for exemption. It transmits our 

decision, explains its basis, and lists the conditions and limitations of the exemption, 

including the date it ends.

The Basis for Our Decision

By letter received April 26, 2013, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) 

on behalf of Hannah Kang for an exemption from § 121.311(b)(2)(iii)(B) of Title 14, Code of 

Federal Regulations (14 CFR). That exemption, if granted, would allow Hannah to exceed the 

specified weight limit for an FAA-approved child restraint system (CAReS, manufactured by 

AmSafe Corporation) during use of that child restraint system (CRS) aboard a United States 

(U.S.) aircraft.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition 

in the Federal Register because the requested exemption would not set a precedent and any 

delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to Hannah.

The FAA has issued grants of exemption in circumstances similar in all material respects to 

those presented in your petition. In Grant of Exemption No. 9834 (copy enclosed), the FAA 

found that numerous people with physical challenges had previously completed flights using 

restraint systems that addressed unique physical needs regarding safety, support, and security 

in the same manner of operations as described in this petition. The FAA further found that the 
2

petition, if granted, would not set any new precedents regarding the use of restraint systems by 

persons with disabilities.

Having reviewed your reasons for requesting an exemption, I find that—

• they do not differ materially from those presented by the petitioner in the enclosed grant;

• the reasons stated by the FAA for granting the enclosed exemption also apply to the 

situation you present; and 

• a grant of exemption is in the public interest.

Our Decision

Under the authority contained in 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator 

has delegated to me, I hereby grant Hannah Kang exemption from 14 CFR

§ 121.311(b)(2)(iii)(B). In addition, any air carrier or commercial operator operating under 

part 121 while Hannah is aboard its aircraft is granted an exemption from

14 CFR § 121.311(b)(2)(iii)(B) to the extent necessary to allow Hannah to exceed the 

specified weight limit for an FAA-approved CRS during use of that CRS aboard a U.S.

aircraft.

All operations under this exemption must be conducted with at least one of Hannah’s parents

or a caregiver accompanying her. Hannah Kang may only occupy a passenger seat with no 

passenger seated behind her. In addition, Hannah’s parent or caregiver must carry a copy of 

this exemption and advise the air carrier about the contents of the exemption at least 48 hours 

before the date of each flight.

This exemption terminates on May 31, 2018, unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

Sincerely,

John S. Duncan

Deputy Director, Flight Standards

Service

Enclosure
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION IX

Heidi Strand, Co-coordinator Citizens for CleanAir P.O. Box 172 Whitmore, CA 96096 75 Hawthorne Street San Francisco, CA 94105

November 22,2013 In Reply Refer To: AIR-3 SAC 12-01

Subject: 

### Extension Request ofPublic Comment Period for the Proposed PSD Permitfor Sierra Pacific Industries- Anderson Division Dear Ms. Strand: This letter is in response to yourNovember 9, 2013 request to extend the public commentperiod for the proposed CleanAir Act Prevention ofSignificant Deterioration (PSD) air quality permit to construct and operate a new cogeneration unit and ancillary equipment atthe Sierra Pacific Industries' existing lumber manufacturing facility in Anderson, California. Specifically, you requested to extend the public commentperiod 90 days after the date ofthe scheduled public hearing for the proposed PSD permit. We have reviewed your request, and we are granting an extension ofthe public commentfor an additional28 days. Thus, the public comment period will nowend on January 10, 2013, instead of December 13, 2013. We believe this extension provides reasonable opportunity for informed public participation. A public notice announcing the extension ofthe public commentperiod onthe proposed permit will be published in the ReddingRecordSearchlight onNovember 22, 2013. The date ofthe public hearing scheduled for December 10, 2013 has not changed. In addition, the proposed PSD permit and all related documents remain unchanged from the versions we issued for public comment onNovember 8, 2013. These documents and other supporting information remain available through the EPA Region 9 website at http://www.epa.gov/region09/air/permit/r9-permits-issued.html, which will also announce the extended public commentperiod. Ifyouhave any questions, you may contact me at (415) 972-3974 orrios.gerardo@epa.gov, or Shaheerah Kelly at (415) 947-4156 orkelly.shaheerah@epa.gov. Sincerely,

Chief, Permits Office Air Division
IV

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 170

Amending House Resolution 5, One Hundred Sixth Congress, as amended.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 13, 1999

Mr. COX (for himself and Mr. DICKS) submitted the following resolution;

which was referred to the Committee on Rules

MAY 13, 1999

The Committee on Rules discharged; considered and agreed to

RESOLUTION

Amending House Resolution 5, One Hundred Sixth Congress,

as amended.

1 Resolved,

2 SECTION 1. AMENDMENT OF HOUSE RESOLUTION 5.

3 Section 2(f)(1) of House Resolution 5, One Hundred

4 Sixth Congress, agreed to January 6, 1999, as amended,

5 is amended by striking ‘‘May 14, 1999’’ and inserting

6 ‘‘May 31, 1999’’.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          10,630
<SECURITIES>                                     1,483
<RECEIVABLES>                                   18,010
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                33,146
<PP&E>                                          48,511
<DEPRECIATION>                                  17,535
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  66,512
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           11,390
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            38
<OTHER-SE>                                      53,630
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    66,512
<SALES>                                         64,683
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                64,683
<CGS>                                           58,317
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   66,341
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (725)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (232)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (493)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (493)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.13)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.13)


</TABLE>
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

# Former Korean Ambassador Discusses North Korea

By Patrick Bray

                MONTEREY, Calif  –              

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More News/Articles
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             NOV-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-2000
<CASH>                                           4,074
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   87,768
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (662)
<INVENTORY>                                    135,480
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                40,029
<PP&E>                                         378,995
<DEPRECIATION>                               (109,018)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 678,584
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          119,056
<BONDS>                                        300,857
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      14,348
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   678,584
<SALES>                                        207,390
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               207,390
<CGS>                                          181,117
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  198,307
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (276)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    12
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              15,141
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,154)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       119
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,273)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,273)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
#### § 11.432 Impersonating a public servant.

A person commits a misdemeanor if he or she falsely pretends to hold a position in the public service with purpose to induce another to submit to such pretended official authority or otherwise to act in reliance upon that pretense to his or her prejudice.
§ 11.608 Final decree; disposition of property; maintenance; child support; custody. ( a ) A decree of dissolution of marriage or of legal separation is final when entered, subject to the right of appeal.
( b ) The Court of Indian Offenses shall have the power to impose judgment as follows in dissolution or separation proceedings: ( 1 ) Apportion or assign between the parties the non-trust property and non-trust assets belonging to either or both and whenever acquired, and whether the title thereto is in the name of the husband or wife or both;
( 2 ) Grant a maintenance order for either spouse in amounts and for periods of time the court deems just;
( 3 ) Order either or both parents owing a duty of support to a child to pay an amount reasonable or necessary for his or her support, without regard to marital misconduct, after considering all relevant factors. In addition: ( i ) When a support order is issued by a Court of Indian Offenses, the order may provide that a portion of an absent parent's wages be withheld to comply with the order on the earliest of the following dates: When an amount equal to one month's support becomes overdue; when the absent parent requests withholding; or at such time as the Court of Indian Offenses selects. The amount to be withheld may include an amount to be applied toward liquidation of any overdue support.
( ii ) If the Court of Indian Offenses finds that an absent parent who has been ordered to pay child support is now residing within the jurisdiction of another Court of Indian Offenses, an Indian tribal court, or a state court, it shall petition such court for reciprocal enforcement and provide it with a copy of the support order.
( iii ) If the Court of Indian Offenses receives a petition from another Court of Indian Offenses, an Indian tribal court or a state court, it shall take necessary steps to determine paternity, establish an order for child support, register a foreign child support order or enforce orders as requested in the petition.
( iv ) The Court of Indian Offenses shall assist a state in the enforcement and collection of past-due support from Federal tax refunds of absent parents living within the Indian country over which the court has jurisdiction.
( v ) Any person or agency who has provided support or assistance to a child under 18 years of age shall be a proper person to bring an action under this section and to recover judgment in an amount equal to such past-paid support or assistance, including costs of bringing the action.
( 4 ) Make child custody determinations in accordance with the best interest of the child.
( 5 ) Restore the maiden name of the wife.
#### Elizabeth Schoenhut, Respondent, v. Albert Schoenhut, Appellant.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. All concurred, except Williams and Kruse, JJ., who dissented.
### **CHAPTER 136—PROVISIONS RELATING TO SPECIFIC PROGRAMS**

Sec.
2281.
Global Positioning System.
[2282.
Repealed.]
[2283.
Renumbered.]
2284.
Explosive Ordnance Disposal Defense Program.
2285.
Department of Defense Climate Resilience Infrastructure Initiative.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**2021**—Pub. L. 117–81, div. A, title III, §332(b), title XVII, §1701(f)(1), Dec. 27, 2021, 135 Stat. 1638, 2139, struck out item 2283 "Department of Defense small business strategy" and added item 2285.

**2018**—Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title III, §311(b), title VIII, §851(c), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1709, 1884, added items 2283 and 2284.

**2016**—Pub. L. 114–328, div. A, title XII, §1241(d)(6), Dec. 23, 2016, 130 Stat. 2505, struck out item 2282 "Authority to build the capacity of foreign security forces".

**2014**—Pub. L. 113–291, div. A, title XII, §1205(a)(2), Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3536, added item 2282.

**2011**—Pub. L. 112–81, div. A, title X, §1061(13)(B), Dec. 31, 2011, 125 Stat. 1583, struck out item 2282 "B–2 bomber: annual report".

**2000**—Pub. L. 106–398, §1 [[div. A], title I, §131(a)(2)], Oct. 30, 2000, 114 Stat. 1654, 1654A–29, added item 2282.
Certification of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer
                             18 U.S.C. Section 1350
                             as Adopted Pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


The undersigned, the Principal Executive Officer (CEO) and the Principal
Financial Officer (Chief Operating Officer) of Millenia Hope Inc. (the
"Company"), each hereby certifies that to his knowledge on the date hereof:

(a)   The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q SB of the Company for the quarter ended
      May 31, 2004, filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange
      Commission (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section
      13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(b)   Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.

Date: July 14, 2004
                                               /s/      Leonard Stella
                                               -------------------------------
                                                        Leonard Stella
                                                        Chief Executive Officer
                                                   (Principal Executive Officer)

Date: July 14, 2004
                                               /s/      Yehuda Kops
                                               -------------------------------
                                                        Yehuda Kops
                                                        Chief Operating Officer
                                                   (Principal Financial Officer)


This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed
by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended.
Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed February 14 , 2019

.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14- 19 -00087- CR

TIMOTHY MARCUS WILLI AMS , Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Criminal Court at Law No. 9

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2127076

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

This is an attempted appeal of the trial court’s order dismissing the case against appellant. In Texas, appeals in criminal cases are permitted only when they are authorized by statute. State ex rel. Lykos , 330 S.W.3d 904, 915 (Tex. Crim. App. 2011); see Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 44.02. Generally, a criminal defendant may only appeal from a final judgment. See State v. Sellers , 790 S.W.2d 316, 321 n.4 (Tex. Crim. App. 1990). A “final judgment” is a “final judgment of2

conviction,” which is defined in the Code of Criminal Procedure as “the written declaration of the court signed by the trial judge and entered of record showing the conviction or acquittal of the defendant.” Raley v. State , 441 S.W.3d 647, 650 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2014, pet ref’d); Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 42.01, § 1. Appellant was not convicted or acquitted. The State filed a motion to dismiss the case against him which the trial court granted.
Because this appeal does not fall within the exceptions to the general rule that appeal may be taken only from a final judgment of conviction, we have no jurisdiction.
Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Wise , Zimmerer, and Spain

. Do Not Publish – Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)