alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

# Angkor Sentinel 2014 Kicks Off with Opening Ceremony

By Staff Sgt. Krista M. FletcherU.S. Army

                KAMPONG SPEU PROVINCE, Cambodia  –              
This article was originally published at: http://www.army.mil/article/124855/Angkor_Sentinel_2014_kicks_off_with_opening_ceremony/

- PACOM: (posted April 29, 2014) -

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

pacom

news

articles
EXHIBIT 32.1

Statement of Chief Executive Officer under 18 U.S.C. § 1350

I, Mark J. Ferrer, the chief executive officer of
Critical Path, Inc. (the Company), certify for the purposes of section 1350 of chapter 63 of title 18 of the United States Code that, to the best of my knowledge,



| | (i) | the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2006 (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | ---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                  
|------------------
|/s/ Mark J. Ferrer
|Mark J. Ferrer    

November 14, 2006

A signed original of this written statement required by 18 U.S.C. § 1350 has been provided to Critical Path, Inc. and will be retained by Critical Path, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-7604

AHMED MALACHI ABDEL-AZIZ,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

PATRICIA R. STANSBERRY,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. James C. Dever, III,

District Judge. (5:06-hc-02140-D; 7:00-cr-00075-F)

Submitted: December 21, 2006 Decided: January 4, 2007

Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ahmed Malachi Abdel-Aziz, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Ahmed Malachi Abdel-Aziz, a state prisoner, appeals the

district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241

(2000) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by

the district court. See Abdel-Aziz v. Stansberry, Nos. 05:06-hc02140-D; 7:00-cr-00075-F (E.D.N.C. Sept. 7, 2006). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

REGION IX 

Heidi Strand, Co-coordinator 

Citizens for Clean Air 

P.O. Box 172 

Whitmore, CA 96096 

75 Hawthorne Street 

San Francisco, CA 94105 

November 22,2013 

In Reply 

Refer To: 

AIR-3 

SAC 12-01 

Subject: Extension Request of Public Comment Period for the Proposed PSD Permit for 

Sierra Pacific Industries- Anderson Division 

Dear Ms. Strand: 

This letter is in response to your November 9, 2013 request to extend the public comment period for the 

proposed Clean Air Act Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) air quality permit to construct and 

operate a new cogeneration unit and ancillary equipment at the Sierra Pacific Industries' existing lumber 

manufacturing facility in Anderson, California. Specifically, you requested to extend the public 

comment period 90 days after the date of the scheduled public hearing for the proposed PSD permit. 

We have reviewed your request, and we are granting an extension of the public comment for an 

additional28 days. Thus, the public comment period will now end on January 10, 2013, instead of 

December 13, 2013. We believe this extension provides reasonable opportunity for informed public 

participation. 

A public notice announcing the extension of the public comment period on the proposed permit will be 

published in the Redding Record Searchlight on November 22, 2013. The date of the public hearing 

scheduled for December 10, 2013 has not changed. In addition, the proposed PSD permit and all related 

documents remain unchanged from the versions we issued for public comment on November 8, 2013. 

These documents and other supporting information remain available through the EPA Region 9 website 

at http://www.epa.gov/region09/air/permit/r9-permits-issued.html, which will also announce the 

extended public comment period. 

If you have any questions, you may contact me at (415) 972-3974 or rios.gerardo@epa.gov, or 

Shaheerah Kelly at (415) 947-4156 or kelly.shaheerah@epa.gov. 

Sincerely, 

Chief, Permits Office 

Air Division
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA
F OURTH D ISTRICT

DENNIS COX , Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA , Appellee

.

No. 4D 15

- 801

[ May 18, 2016 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; Paul L. Backman , Judge; L.T. Case No. 05

- 017017 CF10B

.

Dennis Cox, Crawfordville, pro s e.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Mitchell A. Egber, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.
Dennis Cox appeals the denial of his “Motion for Recalculation of Scoresheet and for Resentencing Based on Reduction of the Sentencing Range as a Result of the Dismissal of Attempted Second Degree Murder with a Firearm

. ” He makes two arguments on appeal. First, the trial court erred in failing to recalculate his sentence after the State nolle prossed his conviction of attempted second

- degree murder. Second, the trial court erred in not considering a downward departure. We agree with his first argument and reverse.

Cox was convicted of robbery with a firearm and attempted second

degree murder. He was sentenced to forty years for each count, to run concurrently. The State later nolle prossed the attempted second

- degree murder charge and the trial court vacated that conviction and sen tence. However, the trial court did not recalculate the sentence or issue a new scoresheet

.
The State argues that if there was error, it was harmless because the trial court “could have imposed” the same sentence. See Brooks v. State

,2 969 So. 2d 238

, 239 (Fla. 2007). However, this standard is used when there is a sentencing scoresheet error. Id. The sentencing scoresheet in the record was not erroneous at the time it was completed. The error here was that the trial court never made a new sentencing scoresheet to recalculate the sentence for the robbery after the attempted second

- degree murder charge was vacated. Therefore, we reverse and remand for recalculation of the sentence.

Reversed and remanded.

S TEVENSON , G ERBER and L EVINE , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Exhibit 32.2

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C.  SECTION 1350**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of General Metals Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended July 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Daniel Forbush, the Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer) of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1)           the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)           the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Dated: September 20, 2007.

 

/s/ Daniel Forbush                                                          

Daniel Forbush

Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial Officer 

and Principal Accounting Officer)
#### § 11.204 Prosecutors.

Except as may otherwise be provided in a contract with the tribe occupying the Indian country over which the court has jurisdiction, the superintendent shall appoint a prosecutor for each Court of Indian Offenses within his or her jurisdiction.
### §10201. Assistant Secretary of Defense for Manpower and Reserve Affairs

As provided in section 138(b)(2) 1 of this title, the official in the Department of Defense with responsibility for overall supervision of reserve affairs of the Department of Defense is the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Manpower and Reserve Affairs.

(Added Pub. L. 103–337, div. A, title XVI, §1661(a)(1), Oct. 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 2976; amended Pub. L. 104–106, div. A, title IX, §903(f)(4), Feb. 10, 1996, 110 Stat. 402; Pub. L. 104–201, div. A, title IX, §901, Sept. 23, 1996, 110 Stat. 2617; Pub. L. 113–291, div. A, title IX, §902(b)(1), Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3469.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Section 138(b)(2) of this title, referred to in text, was struck out and subsec. (b)(4) was redesignated subsec. (b)(2) by Pub. L. 115–91, div. A, title IX, §907(b), Dec. 12, 2017, 131 Stat. 1514.

#### Amendments

2014—Pub. L. 113–291 amended section generally. Prior to amendment, text read as follows: "As provided in section 138(b)(2) of this title, the official in the Department of Defense with responsibility for overall supervision of reserve component affairs of the Department of Defense is the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Reserve Affairs."

1996—Pub. L. 104–106, §903(a), (f)(4), which directed that this section be amended, eff. Jan. 31, 1997, to read "The official in the Department of Defense with responsibility for overall supervision of reserve component affairs of the Department of Defense is the official designated by the Secretary of Defense to have that responsibility.", was repealed by Pub. L. 104–201.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Dec. 1, 1994, except as otherwise provided, see section 1691 of Pub. L. 103–337, set out as a note under section 10001 of this title.

1 See References in Text note below.
#### § 152.3 Information regarding status of applications for removal of Federal supervision over Indian lands.

The status of applications by Indians for patents in fee, certificates of competency, or orders removing restrictions shall be disclosed to employees of the Department of the Interior whose duties require that such information be disclosed to them; to the applicant or his attorney, upon request; and to Members of Congress who inquire on behalf of the applicant. Such information will be available to all other persons, upon request, 15 days after the fee patent has been issued by the Bureau of Land Management, or 15 days after issuance of certificate of competency or order removing restrictions, or after the application has been rejected and the applicant notified. Where the termination of the trust or restricted status of the land covered by the application would adversely affect the protection and use of Indian land remaining in trust or restricted status, the owners of the land that would be so affected may be informed that the application has been filed.
### **CHAPTER 1611—OTHER EDUCATIONAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAMS**

Sec.
16401.
Marine Corps Platoon Leaders Class: college tuition assistance program.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**2000**—Pub. L. 106–398, §1 [[div. A], title V, §533(g)], Oct. 30, 2000, 114 Stat. 1654, 1654A–112, substituted "Class: college tuition assistance program" for "Class program: officer candidates pursuing degrees" in item 16401.
Exhibit 34.1a



LOGO

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Board of Directors and shareholders of CoreLogic, Inc.:

We have examined managements assertion, included in the accompanying Report on Assessment of Compliance, that CoreLogic Tax Services, LLC (the
Company), an indirect subsidiary of CoreLogic, Inc. complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commissions Regulation AB for all loans for residential and commercial mortgage loan
outsourcing customers for which the Company served as the residential and commercial tax service provider (the Platform), as of December 31, 2015 and for the year then ended, only including 1122(d)(1)(iv), 1122(d)(2)(ii), 1122(d)(2)(v),
1122(d)(2)(vi), 1122(d)(2)(vii), 1122(d)(4)(xi), 1122(d)(4)(xii) and 1122(d)(4)(xiii), which the Company has determined are applicable to the servicing activities performed by it with respect to the Platform. Management is responsible for the
Companys compliance with the servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on managements assertion based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly,
included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Companys compliance with the applicable servicing criteria and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing of
selected servicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whether the Company performed those selected activities in compliance with the applicable servicing criteria. Our procedures were limited to the selected servicing activities
performed by the Company during the period covered by this report. Our procedures were not designed to detect noncompliance arising from errors that may have occurred prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances or amounts
calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Companys compliance with
the servicing criteria.

In our opinion, managements assertion that the Company complied with the aforementioned applicable servicing criteria as of
and for the year ended December 31, 2015 for all loans for residential and commercial mortgage loan outsourcing customers for which the Company served as the residential and commercial tax service provider is fairly stated, in all material respects.

February 4, 2016

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, 2001 Ross Avenue, Suite 1800, Dallas, Texas 75201

T: (214) 999-1400, F: (214) 754-7991, www.pwc.com/us
H. Res. 110

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

April 13, 1999.

Whereas on March 7, 1999, the Republic of El Salvador successfully completed its second democratic multiparty elections for President and Vice President since the signing

of the 1992 peace accords;

Whereas these elections were deemed by international and domestic observers to be free and fair and a legitimate nonviolent expression of the will of the people of the Republic

of El Salvador;

Whereas the United States has consistently supported the efforts of the people of El Salvador to consolidate their democracy and to implement the provisions of the 1992

peace accords;

Whereas these elections demonstrate the strength and diversity of El Salvador’s democratic expression and promote

confidence that all political parties can work cooperatively

at every level of government; and

Whereas these open, fair, and democratic elections of the new

President and Vice President should be broadly commended: Now, therefore, be it

Resolved, That the House—
2

•HRES 110 EH

(1) congratulates the Government and the people of

the Republic of El Salvador for the successful completion

of democratic multiparty elections held on March 7,

1999, for President and Vice President;

(2) congratulates President-elect Francisco Guillermo Flores Perez and Vice President-elect Carlos

Quintanilla Schmidt on their recent victory and their

continued strong commitment to democracy, national

reconciliation, and reconstruction;

(3) congratulates El Salvadoran President Armando

Caldero ́n Sol for his personal commitment to democracy,

which has helped in the building of national unity in the

Republic of El Salvador;

(4) commends all Salvadoran citizens and political

parties for their efforts to work together to take risks for

democracy and to willfully pursue national reconciliation

in order to cement a lasting peace and to strengthen

democratic traditions in El Salvador;

(5) supports Salvadoran attempts to continue their

cooperation in order to ensure democracy, national reconciliation, and economic prosperity; and
3

•HRES 110 EH

(6) reaffirms that the United States is unequivocally committed to encouraging democracy and peaceful

development throughout Central America.

Attest:

Clerk.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsDevelopment of an Axisymmetric Afterbody Test Case for Turbulent Flow Separation ValidationAs identified in the CFD Vision 2030 Study commissioned by NASA, validation of advanced RANS models and scale-resolving methods for computing turbulent flows must be supported by improvements in high-quality experiments designed specifically for CFD implementation. A new test platform referred to as the Axisymmetric Afterbody allows for a range of flow behaviors to be studied on interchangeable afterbodies while facilitating access to higher Reynolds number facilities. A priori RANS computations are reported for a risk-reduction configuration to demonstrate critical variation among turbulence model results for a given afterbody, ranging from barely-attached to mild separated flow. The effects of body nose geometry and tunnel-wall boundary condition on the computed afterbody flow are explored to inform the design of an experimental test program.Document ID20170011474Acquisition SourceLangley Research CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsDisotell, Kevin J.*(Universities Space Research Association Hampton, VA, United States)*Rumsey, Christopher L.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Date AcquiredDecember 1, 2017Publication DateNovember 1, 2017Subject CategoryAerodynamicsFluid Mechanics And ThermodynamicsReport/Patent NumberNASA/TM-2017-219680NF1676L-28486L-20890Funding Number(s)WBS: WBS 109492.02.07.01.01Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightPublic Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType20170011474.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>               5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the June
30, 1999 unaudited financial statements and is qualified in its entirety by such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                         485,671
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,255,402
<ALLOWANCES>                                   652,830
<INVENTORY>                                  1,099,733
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,573,780
<PP&E>                                       5,572,588
<DEPRECIATION>                                 666,341
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               8,865,692
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,594,073
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  2,189,186
<COMMON>                                         8,623
<OTHER-SE>                                   8,998,573
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 8,865,692
<SALES>                                      2,928,810
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,928,810
<CGS>                                        2,631,247
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,061,118
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,648,084
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             141,166
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,614,345)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              (756,052)
<CHANGES>                                    (259,757)
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,594,309)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.32)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.32)


</TABLE>