alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 15.304 When must I file my claim?

You must file your claim before the conclusion of the first hearing by OHA or, for cases designated as summary probate proceedings, as allowed under 43 CFR 30.140. Claims not timely filed will be barred.
§ 141.11 Tribal fees, taxes, and enforcement. ( a ) The regulations in this part do not preclude the Hopi, Navajo, or Zuni tribal councils from assessing and collecting such fees or taxes as they may deem appropriate from reservation businesses.
( b ) Nothing in the regulations of this part may be construed to preclude tribal enforcement of these regulations or consistent tribal ordinances.
[40 FR 39837, Aug. 29, 1975, as amended at 41 FR 3288, Jan. 22, 1976. Redesignated at 47 FR 13327, Mar. 30, 1982]
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-7962
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus JEMAL WALTER WILLIAMS, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Spartanburg. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District Judge. (7:94-cr-00210-HMH; 7:01-cv-03549) Submitted: February 22, 2007 Decided: March 5, 2007 Before WILLIAMS, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jemal Walter Williams, Appellant Pro Se. David Calhoun Stephens, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Jemal Walter Williams appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his motion for reconsideration filed pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b). Our review of the record discloses that this appeal is without merit. Williams has not raised any meritorious issues nor presented any evidence not previously considered by the district court as to its dismissal of Williams’ 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion as untimely. We therefore find that the district court's denial of his motion for reconsideration was not an abuse of discretion. United States v. Winestock , 340 F.3d 200, 203 (4th Cir. 2003). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
§ 162.022 What are BIA's responsibilities in administering and enforcing leases? ( a ) Upon written notification from an Indian landowner that the lessee has failed to comply with the terms and conditions of the lease, we will promptly take appropriate action, as specified in §§ 162.364, 162.464, and 162.589. Nothing in this part prevents an Indian landowner from exercising remedies available to the Indian landowners under the lease or applicable law.
( b ) We will promptly respond to requests for BIA approval of amendments, assignments, leasehold mortgages, and subleases, as specified in subparts C, D, and E.
( c ) We will respond to Indian landowners' concerns regarding the management of their land.
( d ) We will take emergency action as needed to preserve the value of the land under § 162.024.
----

----

|   | 1.   The Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2.   The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |                                                                                                                   |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | /s/ Michael A. Reisner Michael A. ReisnerCo-President and Co-Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer) |
|   | CĪON Investment Corporation                                                                                       |
### §1207. Disability from intentional misconduct or willful neglect: separation

Each member of the armed forces who incurs a physical disability that, in the determination of the Secretary concerned, makes him unfit to perform the duties of his office, grade, rank, or rating, and that resulted from his intentional misconduct or willful neglect or was incurred during a period of unauthorized absence, shall be separated from his armed force without entitlement to any benefits under this chapter.

(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 94.)

| Revised section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1207 | 37:278. | Oct. 12, 1949, ch. 681, §408, 63 Stat. 823. |

The words "Each member * * * who" are substituted for the words "When a member * * * such member". The words "is determined to have" are omitted as surplusage.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-6849

VANCE BYRD,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

ROBERT L. EHRLICH, JR., Governor; MARY ANN

SAAR, Secretary of Public Safety and

Correctional Services,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. William D. Quarles, Jr., District Judge.

(CA-03-01270-03-WDQ)

Submitted: August 14, 2003 Decided: August 22, 2003

Before WILLIAMS, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Vance Byrd, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Vance Byrd appeals the district court’s order dismissing his

42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons

stated by the district court. See Byrd v. Ehrlich, No. CA-03-

01270-03-WDQ (D. Md. filed May 19, 2003; entered May 20, 2003). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### § 11.415 Fraud.

A person who shall by willful misrepresentation or deceit, or by false interpreting, or by the use of false weights or measures obtain any money or other property, shall be guilty of fraud, a misdemeanor.
### §14006. Determination of years in grade

For the purpose of chapters 1403 through 1411 of this title, an officer's years of service in a grade are computed from the officer's date of rank in grade as determined under section 741(d) of this title.

(Added Pub. L. 103–337, div. A, title XVI, §1611, Oct. 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 2923.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Oct. 1, 1996, see section 1691(b)(1) of Pub. L. 103–337, set out as a note under section 10001 of this title.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 928 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 928

 To require that the 2000 decennial census include either a general or 
 targeted followup mailing of census questionnaires, whichever, in the 
   judgment of the Secretary of Commerce, will be more effective in 
 securing the return of census information from the greatest number of 
                          households possible.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 2, 1999

Mr. Miller of Florida introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                 to the Committee on Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To require that the 2000 decennial census include either a general or 
 targeted followup mailing of census questionnaires, whichever, in the 
   judgment of the Secretary of Commerce, will be more effective in 
 securing the return of census information from the greatest number of 
                          households possible.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``2000 Census Mail Outreach 
Improvement Act''.

SEC. 2. SECOND MAILING REQUIRED.

    (a) Requirement.--The Secretary of Commerce shall ensure that, in 
taking the 2000 decennial census, after the original mailing of census 
questionnaires, a replacement questionnaire shall be sent either--
            (1) to all households included in the original mailing, or
            (2) to each household not responding to the original 
        mailing,
whichever, in the judgment of the Secretary, will be more effective in 
securing the return of a completed questionnaire from the greatest 
number of households possible.
    (b) Additional Considerations.--In making a decision under 
subsection (a), the Secretary of Commerce shall also take into 
consideration such factors as the need for timely and accurate 
information, cost, and ease of administration.
    (c) Decennial Census Defined.--For purposes of this Act, the term 
``decennial census'' means a decennial census of population conducted 
under section 141(a) of title 13, United States Code.
                                 <all>
```
This document is not available in Regulations.gov since it is a copyrighted publication and may not be reproduced without consent of the copyright holder. Contact the EPA Docket Center, Public Reading Room to view or receive a copy of this document. Requests for copies may be made as follows: In person/writing: Environmental Protection Agency, Docket Center 1301 Constitution Ave NW, 2822T, Room 3334 Washington, DC. 20004 Telephone: 202-566-1744
Fax: 202-566- 9744 Email: docket-customerservice@epa.gov
#### § 11.444 Carrying concealed weapons.

A person who goes about in public places armed with a dangerous weapon concealed upon his or her person is guilty of a misdemeanor unless he or she has a permit to do so signed by a magistrate of the Court of Indian Offenses.
#### § 161.705 How long will a written trespass notice remain in effect?

A written trespass notice will remain in effect for the same action identified in that written notice for a period of one year from the date of receipt of the written notice by the trespasser.
#### § 150.101 What is the purpose of the record of title?

The record of title provides the BIA with a record of title documents to Indian land and provides constructive notice that the title documents exist.
! ! ! ! !

! ! ! ! ! ! !

! ! !

!

!

!

!

!

!

! !

! !

!

!

!

! ! ! !

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

! !

!

!

!

!

!

! !

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

! !

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

! ! !

! ! !

! ! ! ! ! !

! ! ! !

! ! ! ! !

!

! !

! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !

! ! ! 

!

! !

!

!

!

!

!

!

! !

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

! !

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

! !

!

!

!

7

7

7

7

7

7

7

7

7

7

7

!>

!8

Dunns

Clear

Gul

Montana

Peak

Eliza Gulch

Creek

Vesa

Schoolho use

Skunk

Creek

Creek

Canal

Bluffs

Indian

Creek

Baldy

China

Peak

Creek

Klamath River

Community Hall

D gi gles

Fork

South

Gulch

Gulch

Humbug

Sweetwate r Gl

Croy Gulch

Rider

Humbug

Garvey

Bar

Gulch

Badger

Mtn

Tree Of Heaven

Mahogany

Point

Gulch

Deadwood

Baldy Peak

Creek

Elmo Gul

Baldy

Gap

Whites

Creek

Greenhorn

McConnell Bar

Vesa

River

Long

Hi You

Gul

Dowling

Cousins Gl

Rusby

Gulch

Jakes

Gulch

Trail

Butcher

Middle

Fork

Yreka

Creek

Hawkinsville

Humbug

Gulch

Cr

Gul

Gul

Gu cl h

Creek

Gulch

Gulch

Tincup

Lime

Gulch

Punch

Rocky

Creek

Brushy

Gulch

Humbug

Gulch

Creek

Gulch

Kennebeck

Big

Gulch

Ash Creek

Bridge

Woodrat

Bar

Cedar

Flat

China Gul

Rider

Gap

Gulch

Craggy

Mtn

Haystack

Butte

Deadwood

Gunsight

Peak

La

wson

Garvey

Creek

Sucker

Gulch

Badger

Humbug

Point

McKinley

Mtn

46N18

6G01

8J001

45N08X

B

46N41 46N29

46N27

45N2 8

45N53

45N88

7J031

7J001

A

8J002

45N03X

45N96

A

45N79Y

45N09X

45N49

45N33X

46N33

46N27

7H002

45N26Y

A

45N39

7J001

C

45N54Y

7H01

46N24

7J002

45N28

7J001

45N47

46N22

45N41

7J018

45N33

B

46N59Y

46N55Y

8J002

45N28

45N36

7 J021

45N96Y

45N37

46N39

45N29

45N42

45N92

45N53

45N28

45N49

45N51

45N96

A

A

A

7J020

45N43

45N52

45N80Y

45N55Y

46N22

46N90

G

A

45N46

7J002

8J001

46N26

45N46

7J002

D

45N54X

46N30

46N36

46N36

46N16

45N28

H

46N58

45N50

45N39Y

8J002

45N04X 7J001

45N88

45N39

7J001

A

13

31

12

30

17

32

16

9

22

25

24

14 13

7

33

27

27

11

26

24

24

30

20

34

23

11

35

36

7

5

28

22

19

27

26

31

18

32

29

20

8

20

29

10

2

14

24

25

12

19

8

26 25

19

19

6

17 16

10

26

11

7

1 6 5

20

17

28

28

15

11

14

1

30

21

25

7

29

18

21

4

33

22

10

3

12

24

8

3

13

36

18

29

16

27

2

23

13

18

30 28

16

9

4

9

15

34

23

14

35

13

8

21

9

15

10

12

21

17

22

15

23

12

R 9W R 8W R 7W

T 45N

T 46N

Legend

Project Boundary

Proposed Vegetation Treatment

Thinning with Forest Product Removal

Thinning without Forest Product Removal

Ownership

USDA FOREST SERVICE

NON FOREST SERVICE

Trails

Motorized Vehicle Trails

Roads by Maintenance Level

Forest Road, ML 1

Forest Road, ML 2

Forest Road, ML 3, 4, 5

Roads other than Forest Open System Roads

State or US Highway/County Road/Interstate

Private/Other Road

Proposed Temporary Roads

Temp Roads on Existing Roadbed

New Temp Roads

Craggy Project

Proposed Action for Scoping

Vegetation Treatment Map

Klamath National Forest

0 0.5 1

.

Miles

Date: 12/29/2015
#### § 1200.30 How does a tribe notify the Department if it wishes to return withdrawn funds to Federal trust status?

If a tribe elects to return some or all of the funds it has withdrawn from Federal trust status pursuant to this Act, it must first notify us in writing at our address in § 1200.13. This notification must provide a proposed date for the return of the funds, as well as the amount of funds to be returned, or actual securities to be delivered to the appropriate custodian.
**Exhibit
      32.1**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
        connection with the quarterly report of Lexington Resources, Inc. (the
        "Company") on Form 10-QSB/A First Amended for  the period
        ended June 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
        on the date hereof (the "Report"), Grant R. Atkins, Chief Executive
        Officer/Interim Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies for the
        purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities
        Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act") and Section 1350 of Chapter 63
        of
        Title 18 of the United States Code, that:





1.
      the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Exchange Act; and





2.
      the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date:
                  August 23, 2007/s/ Grant
                  R. AtkinsGrant
                  R. Atkins
                Chief
                  Executive Officer/Interim Chief Financial Officer
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-6091
JAMES LEE HOOKER, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus RONALD J. ANGELONE, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections, Respondent - Appellee.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca B. Smith, District Judge. (CA-96-661-2) Submitted: August 28, 1997 Decided: September 16, 1997 Before WILKINS, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. James Lee Hooker, Appellant Pro Se. Linwood Theodore Wells, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge andfind no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Hooker v. Angelone , No. CA-96-661-2 (E.D. Va. Jan. 7, 1997).We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
ANNUAL STATEMENT AS TO COMPLIANCE

UBS-Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Trust 2011-C1



The undersigned, David Co, a Director of Deutsche Bank Trust Company
Americas, as the Certificate Administrator (a “Certifying Servicer”) under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, dated
as of December 1, 2011, as amended (the “Agreement”), by and among, Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Securities Inc., as Depositor,
Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer, Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association,
as Special Servicer, Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as Trustee, Certificate Administrator, Paying Agent and Custodian, and
Trimont Real Estate Advisors, Inc., as Operating Advisor, here by certifies in accordance with Section 10.11 of the Agreement:



| | A) | A review of such Certifying Servicer's activities from January 1, 2017 to December 31, 2017 (the “reporting period”) and of such
Certifying Servicer's performance under the Agreement has been made under such officer's supervision and
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | B) | That, to the best of such officer's knowledge, based on such review, such Certifying Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations
under the Agreement, in all material respects during the reporting period.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



DEUTSCHE BANK TRUST COMPANY AMERICAS

as Certificate Administrator



/s/ David Co

BY: David Co

Title: Director

Date: March 1, 2018
H. Res. 104

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

March 16, 1999.

Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule

XVIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee of the

Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of

the bill (H.R. 819) to authorize appropriations for the Federal Maritime Commission for fiscal years 2000 and 2001.

The first reading of the bill shall be dispensed with. General

debate shall be confined to the bill and shall not exceed one

hour equally divided and controlled by the chairman and

ranking minority member of the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure. After general debate the bill shall

be considered for amendment under the five-minute rule. The

bill shall be considered as read. During consideration of the

bill for amendment, the Chairman of the Committee of the

Whole may accord priority in recognition on the basis of

whether the Member offering an amendment has caused it to

be printed in the portion of the Congressional Record designated for that purpose in clause 8 of rule XVIII. Amend-
2

•HRES 104 EH

ments so printed shall be considered as read. The Chairman

of the Committee of the Whole may: (1) postpone until a time

during further consideration in the Committee of the Whole

a request for a recorded vote on any amendment; and (2) reduce to five minutes the minimum time for electronic voting

on any postponed question that follows another electronic

vote without intervening business, provided that the minimum

time for electronic voting on the first in any series of questions shall be 15 minutes. At the conclusion of consideration

of the bill for amendment the Committee shall rise and report

the bill to the House with such amendments as may have

been adopted. The previous question shall be considered as

ordered on the bill and amendments thereto to final passage

without intervening motion except one motion to recommit

with or without instructions.

Attest:

Clerk.
#### § 103.3 Who administers the Program?

Authority for administering the Program ultimately rests with the Secretary, who may exercise that authority directly at any time. Absent a direct exercise of authority, however, the Secretary delegates Program authority to BIA officials through the U.S. Department of Interior Departmental Manual. A lender should submit all applications and correspondence to the BIA office serving the borrower's location.
#### § 1000.72 Will OSG notify Tribes/Consortia and affected non-BIA bureaus of the results of the selection process?

Yes, OSG will notify all applicant Tribes/Consortia and affected non-BIA bureaus in writing as soon as possible after completing the selection process.
### §120. Department of Defense executive aircraft controlled by Secretaries of military departments

(a) In General.—The Secretary of Defense shall ensure that the Chief of the Air Force Special Air Mission Office is given the responsibility for coordination of scheduling all Department of Defense executive aircraft controlled by the Secretaries of the military departments in order to support required use travelers.

(b) Responsibilities.—(1) Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this section, the Secretary of each of the military departments shall execute a memorandum of understanding with the Air Force Special Air Mission Office regarding oversight and management of executive aircraft controlled by that military department.

(2) The Secretary of Defense shall be responsible for prioritizing travel when requests exceed available executive airlift capability.

(3) The Secretary of a military department shall maintain overall authority for scheduling the required use travelers of that military department on executive aircraft controlled by the Secretary. When an executive aircraft controlled by the Secretary of a military department is not supporting required use travelers of that military department, the Secretary of the military department shall make such executive aircraft available for scheduling of other required use travelers.

(c) Limitations.—(1) The Secretary of Defense may not establish a new command and control organization to support aircraft.

(2) No executive aircraft controlled by the Secretary of a military department may be permanently stationed at any location without a required use traveler without the approval of the Secretary of Defense.

(d) Definitions.—In this section:

(1) The term "required use traveler" has the meaning given such term in Department of Defense directive 4500.56, as in effect on the date of the enactment of this section.

(2) The term "executive aircraft" has the meaning given such term in Department of Defense directive 4500.43, as in effect on the date of the enactment of this section.

(Added Pub. L. 116–92, div. A, title X, §1051(a), Dec. 20, 2019, 133 Stat. 1590.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The date of the enactment of this section, referred to in subsecs. (b) and (d), is the date of enactment of Pub. L. 116–92, which was approved Dec. 20, 2019.