alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 08-1796

ERWIN B. PATTERSON, JR., 

 Plaintiff - Appellant, 

 v. 

CITY OF CHESAPEAKE; COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA; STEPHEN E. 

MILLS; JOHN C. LUMPKIN P.C.; TEIDE ENTERPRISES, 

INCORPORATED; TOWNE BANK; CITY OF NORFOLK POLICE DEPARTMENT; 

CITY OF CHESAPEAKE POLICE DEPARTMENT; WILLIAM T. HODSDEN; 

W.A. COPELAND; STUART GORDON; CITY OF NORFOLK; CLARENDON 

NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY, 

 Defendants - Appellees. 

No. 08-1928

ERWIN B. PATTERSON, JR., 

 Plaintiff - Appellant, 

 v. 

CITY OF CHESAPEAKE; STEPHEN E. MILLS; JOHN C. LUMPKIN P.C.; 

TEIDE ENTERPRISES, INCORPORATED; CITY OF CHESAPEAKE POLICE 

DEPARTMENT; STUART GORDON; CLARENDON NATIONAL INSURANCE 

COMPANY, 

 Defendants – Appellees, 

 and 
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA; TOWNE BANK; CITY OF NORFOLK POLICE 

DEPARTMENT; WILLIAM T. HODSDEN; W.A. COPELAND; CITY OF 

NORFOLK, 

 Defendants. 

No. 08-2268

ERWIN B. PATTERSON, JR., 

 Plaintiff - Appellant, 

 v. 

JOHN C. LUMPKIN P.C., 

 Defendant – Appellee, 

 and 

CITY OF CHESAPEAKE; COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA; STEPHEN E. 

MILLS; TEIDE ENTERPRISES, INCORPORATED; TOWNE BANK; CITY OF 

NORFOLK POLICE DEPARTMENT; CITY OF CHESAPEAKE POLICE 

DEPARTMENT; WILLIAM T. HODSDEN; W.A. COPELAND; STUART 

GORDON; CITY OF NORFOLK; CLARENDON NATIONAL INSURANCE 

COMPANY, 

 Defendants. 

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District 

Judge. (2:07-cv-00611-RAJ-FBS) 

Submitted: February 19, 2009 Decided: February 23, 2009 

Before WILKINSON, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. 

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

2 
Erwin B. Patterson, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Catherine Hanson 

Lindley, Grady A. Palmer, CHESAPEAKE CITY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, 

Chesapeake, Virginia, Stephen Michael Hall, Assistant Attorney 

General, Richmond, Virginia, Marshall Allen Winslow, Jr., 

WOLCOTT, RIVERS & GATES, Virginia Beach, Virginia, Sara Ashley 

John, M. RICHARD EPPS, PC, Virginia Beach, Virginia, Robert 

Henry Burger, WILLIAMS MULLEN, Virginia Beach, Virginia, Andrew 

Richard Fox, Assistant City Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, Joseph 

Franklin Verser, JONES, BLECHMAN, WOLTZ & KELLY, PC, Newport 

News, Virginia, for Appellees. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 

3 
4 

PER CURIAM: 

In these consolidated cases, Erwin B. Patterson, Jr., 

seeks to appeal the district court’s orders cumulatively 

dismissing all defendants from this civil action. We have 

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, 

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. 

Patterson v. City of Chesapeake, No. 2:07-cv-00611-RAJ-FBS (E.D. 

Va. June 20, 2008; Aug. 8, 2008; filed Sept. 30 & entered 

Oct. 2, 2008). We further grant Patterson’s motion to proceed 

on appeal in forma pauperis, but deny his motion to admit new 

evidence. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process. 

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-196470 on Form S-3 and in Registration Statement No. 333-190622 on
Form S-8 of our reports dated March 16, 2015, relating to the consolidated financial statements and financial statements schedule of BioAmber Inc. and subsidiaries, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of BioAmber Inc. for the year
ended December 31, 2014.

/s/ Deloitte LLP1

Montreal,
Canada

April 30, 2015





|1 | CPA auditor, CA, public accountancy permit No. A118581
|- | ------------------------------------------------------
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

# Seabees, Tonga Counterparts Advance Disaster Center Project

By Mass Communication Specialist 1st Class Chris FaheyUS Navy

                TE'EKIU, Tonga  –              http://www.cpf.navy.mil/news.aspx/030321

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT
§ 162.236 How will a cash bond be administered? ( a ) If a cash bond is submitted, we will retain the funds in an account established in the name of the tenant.
( b ) We will not pay interest on a cash performance bond.
( c ) If the bond is not forfeited under § 162.252(a) of this subpart, we will refund the bond to the tenant upon the expiration or termination of the lease.
#### Emmons County *vs.*Chas. H. Davidson.

Opinion filed November 13, 1900.

(84 N. W. Rep. 1117.)

Appeal from District Court, Emmons County; *Winchester,*J.

*George M. Register*and *Cochrane & Corliss,*for appellant.

*H. A. Armstrong*and *Stevens & Allen,*for respondents.

Per Curiam.

The controlling questions in this case were involved and decided in the case of *Emmons Co.*v. *Thompson*(decided this term) 9 N. D. 598, 84 N. W. Rep. 385. The order appealed from is in all things reversed, and the District Court is directed to enter an order reversing the same, and also to enter an order denying the application made herein to vacate said judgment and tax sale, with costs of both courts to appellant.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

November 19, 2014

h1112 

# Order

Clerk November 19, 2014

147944

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 147944

COA: 317680

Wayne CC: 12

- 009625

- FH

DERRICK PERSON,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 12, 2013

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DEN IED, because we are not

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
#### § 15.107 Who prepares a probate file?

The agency that serves the tribe where the decedent was an enrolled member will prepare the probate file in consultation with the potential heirs or devisees who can be located, and with other people who have information about the decedent or the estate.
#### § 16.7 Performance of Federal functions by successor State courts.

All authority to perform functions relating to Indians of the Five Civilized Tribes which by express provisions of Federal statute had been conferred upon probate or county courts of Oklahoma before such county courts were abolished on January 12, 1969, has since that date been vested in the successor district courts of that State, and all rights of litigants continue undiminished in the successor forum, including the right to appeal from adverse decisions rendered therein to the successor appellate court.

(Interprets or applies Okla. Op. Atty. Gen. No. 68-381 (Dec. 20, 1968))
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF - Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Yokota, Creech Leadership Visit Kanoya Air Base 

By Staff Sgt. Jessica Avallone374th Airlift Wing Public Affairs

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More
#### Ex Parte O. M. Redding.

No. 22905.

Delivered May 31, 1944.

Rehearing Denied (Without Written Opinion) June 21, 1944.

*435The opinion states the case.

*H. H. Cooper, R. E. Underwood, Sr.,*and *Clem Calhoun,*all of Amarillo, for appellant.

*Ernest S. Goens,*State’s Attorney, of Austin, for the State.

KRUEGER, Judge.

Appellant was charged by indictment Avith the offense of murder alleged to have been committed in Potter County, Texas., on or about the 6th day of April, 1944. He was arrested by the sheriff of said county and placed in jail. He immediately presented to the Judge of the District Court for.the 47th Judicial District of Texas, an application for a writ of habeas corpus in which he averred that he was being illegally restrained of his liberty by the sheriff. The writ was issued as prayed for, and upon a hearing thereof, he was remanded to the custody of the sheriff without the benefit of bail. From said order and judgment he appealed to this court.

We have read the record before us with care and reached the conclusion that under the law and the facts, he is entitled to bail. In passing on the question of bail, it is important to keep in mind Section 11 of Article 1 of the Constitution of Texas, which provides:

> “All prisoners shall be bailable by sufficient sureties, unless for capital offenses when the proof is evident; but this provision shall not be so construed as to prevent bail after indictment found, upon examination of the evidence, in such manner as may be prescribed by law.”

*436THe word “evident” in the Constitution, has been construed to mean that the accused, with a cool and deliberate mind and formed design, did maliciously kill another and that a dispassionate jury would not only convict him but would also assess the death penalty.

In cases of this nature, it has long been the policy of this court to refrain from stating the facts at length or to express a conclusion thereon.

It sometimes happens that the same evidence which the State introduces and relies on to show malice might be appropriated by the jury to indicate a killing in which the accused acted under the influence of sudden passion arising from adequate cause as defined in Art. 1257c, Vernon’s Ann. Tex. P. C. When such is the case, this court would be in no position to say that the jury would accept the evidence as showing malice instead of adequate cause, and, therefore, we are likewise, in no position to. say that such an accused should be denied bail. Believing the facts in the record before us present such a situation, it is our conclusion that appellant is entitled to bail.

The judgment is reversed and bail is granted in the sum of $15,000.00, and that- upon the execution of a bond in said sum, with good and sufficient sureties, appellant is ordered released from' custody.

The foregoing opinion' of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
Exhibit 31.2
Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 I, Rhonda R. Kelley, certify that:

 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Mid-Wisconsin
Financial Services, Inc. (the "registrant");

 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant
as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

       (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
      disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
      to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including
      its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
      entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
      prepared;

       (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
      and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
      effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of
      the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

       (c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
      control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
      most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the
      case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably
      likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over
      financial reporting; and

 5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

       (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
      or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
      reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
      process, summarize and report financial information; and

       (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
      other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
      control over financial reporting.

Date:  August 15, 2006    RHONDA R. KELLEY
                          Rhonda R. Kelley
                          Controller
                          (Principal Accounting Officer)
§ 162.602 Cabazon, Augustine, and Torres-Martinez Reservations, California. ( a ) Upon a determination by the Secretary that the owner or owners are not making beneficial use thereof, restricted lands on the Cabazon, Augustine, and Torres-Martinez Indian Reservations which are or may be irrigated from distribution facilities administered by the Coachella Valley County Water District in Riverside County, California, may be leased by the Secretary in accordance with the regulations in this part for the benefit of the owner or owners.
( b ) All leases granted or approved on restricted lands of the Cabazon, Augustine, and Torres-Martinez Indian Reservations shall be filed for record in the office of the county recorder of the county in which the land is located, the cost thereof to be paid by the lessee. A copy of each such lease shall be filed by the lessee with the Coachella Valley County Water District or such other irrigation or water district within which the leased lands are located. All such leases shall include a provision that the lessee, in addition to the rentals provided for in the lease, shall pay all irrigation charges properly assessed against the land which became payable during the term of the lease. Act of August 25, 1950 (64 Stat. 470); Act of August 28, 1958 (72 Stat. 968).
[66 FR 7109, Jan. 22, 2001. Redesignated at 77 FR 72494, Dec. 5, 2012 and correctly redesignated at 78 FR 27860, May 13, 2013]
#### § 1000.339 How does retrocession affect a bureau's operation of the retroceded program?

The level of operation of the program will depend upon the amount of funding that is returned with the retrocession.
FEBRUARY 23, 1944

#### Ex Parte John William Caples.

No. 22798.

Delivered February 23, 1944.

The opinion states the case.

*Chas. Oioen,*of El Paso, and *C. W. Croom,*of Houston, for appellant.

*Ernest S. Goens,*State’s Attorney, of Austin, for the State.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

The relator was arrested by the Sheriff of El Paso County on a warrant from the Governor of Texas which had been issued in an extradition proceeding seeking to return relator to California as a fugitive from justice. This proceeding was instituted by him in an effort to secure his release. The trial court heard the evidence upon which the release was sought and remanded him to the custody of the Sheriff. Hence the appeal.

*29We are unable to determine the basis for the appeal. No brief is filed by appellant and there are no Bills of Exception pointing out any error in the proceedings in the court below. From the statement of facts it appears that appellant attempted to establish his innocence which may not be done in a Texas court. All the facts pertinent to the State’s case were presented by the State and the court found in its favor.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
Exhibit 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Hometown Auto Retailers, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Charles
F. Schwartz, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


/s/ Charles F. Schwartz
------------------------------
Charles F. Schwartz
Chief Financial Officer
May 14, 2003


                                       29
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 6 (Monday, January 10, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 1473]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-369]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting Notice

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the 
Government in the Sunshine Act, Public Law 94-409, that the Securities 
and Exchange Commission will hold a Closed Meeting on Thursday, January 
13, 2011 at 2 p.m.
    Commissioners, Counsel to the Commissioners, the Secretary to the 
Commission, and recording secretaries will attend the Closed Meeting. 
Certain staff members who have an interest in the matters also may be 
present.
    The General Counsel of the Commission, or his designee, has 
certified that, in his opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth 
in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(3), (5), (7), 9(B) and (10) and 17 CFR 
200.402(a)(3), (5), (7), 9(ii) and (10), permit consideration of the 
scheduled matters at the Closed Meeting.
    Commissioner Walter, as duty officer, voted to consider the items 
listed for the Closed Meeting in a closed session.
    The subject matter of the Closed Meeting scheduled for Thursday, 
January 13, 2011 will be:
    Institution and settlement of injunctive actions;
    Institution and settlement of administrative proceedings;
    Adjudicatory matters; and other matters relating to enforcement 
proceedings.
    At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in 
the scheduling of meeting items.
    For further information and to ascertain what, if any, matters have 
been added, deleted or postponed, please contact:
    The Office of the Secretary at (202) 551-5400.

    Dated: January 6, 2011.
Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011-369 Filed 1-6-11; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
§ 1000.365 What are the requirements of the review team report? A report summarizing the results of the trust evaluation will be prepared and copies provided to the Tribe/Consortium. The report must: ( a ) Be written objectively, concisely, and clearly; and
( b ) Present information accurately and fairly, including only relevant and adequately supported information, findings, and conclusions.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 21 Agreed to House (ATH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 21

 Designating majority membership to certain standing committees of the 
                                 House.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 19, 1999

Mr. Armey submitted the following resolution; which was considered and 
                               agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Designating majority membership to certain standing committees of the 
                                 House.

    Resolved, That the following named Members be, and are hereby, 
elected to the following standing committee of the House:
    Committee on the Budget: Mr. Collins of Georgia and Mr. Wamp of 
Tennessee, both to rank in the named order following Mr. Ryun of 
Kansas.
                                 <all>
```