alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 139.5 Assessments after the Indian title has been extinguished.

Indian-owned lands passing to non-Indian ownership shall be assessed for construction costs and the first assessment shall be due on December 31 of the year that the Indian title is extinguished. The construction costs against this land will be established as provided by section 5 of the act of September 26, 1961 (75 Stat. 680). The annual per acre assessment rate will be determined by dividing the established construction cost per acre into forty equal payments. “B” lands will also be assessed for reservoir construction costs in the annual per-acre rate as established in the Designation Report dated August 1962. Assessments against this land will continue until the entire established construction costs shall have been repaid to the U.S. Treasury. Landowners may pay at any time the total of the then remaining indebtedness. Under the act of March 10, 1928 (45 Stat. 210), the unpaid charges stand as a lien against the lands until paid.
#### § 1200.31 What part of withdrawn funds can be returned to trust?

A tribe may return all or a portion of the principal which was removed from trust under this Act along with earnings and profits. We will verify the amount declared for earnings before we accept a return. We will accept any amount less than the original principal amount as a principal amount.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# U.S. and Japan Conduct Integrated Bomber Exercise 

SEA OF Japan -- U.S. Indo-Pacific Command and the Japan Self-Defense Forces conducted a bilateral bomber integration exercise on March 19, 2023, demonstrating the enduring and lethal deterrence options readily available to the U.S.-Japan Alliance.Two B-1 Lancer bombers and four F-16 fighter aircraft integrated with four Japan Air Self-Defense Force F-15 fighter aircraft over the Sea of Japan, exemplifying our alliance's ability to quickly and decisively respond to threats against Japan and the region. The U.S. remains committed to peace and prosperity throughout the Indo-Pacific alongside our Japanese allies, together acting as the cornerstone of regional peace and security and presenting an ironclad defense of Japan. 

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More
COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA
RE: Docket [Number 2022 - CA -0831 

### Aleshia and David Carey Versus - - 17th Judicial District Court 

### United Property and Casualty Insurance Company Case #: 143802 Lafourche Parish

On Application for Rehearing Fled on 06/08/2023 By Aleshia and David Carey Rehearing 

## D P-A- e A

G Mitchell R. Theriot 

## 12t.-, 

# c4a, 4, Wayne Ray hutz Chris Hester

Date 

# AN 14 2023 Rodd Naqu
§ 141.38 Pawn loans, period, notice and sale. ( a ) The proceeds of all loans secured by pawn and for which a finance charge is imposed shall be paid only in cash or with a fully negotiable check.
( b ) The period of all such loans shall be no less than twelve (12) months, subject to the provisions of paragraph (c).
( c ) Thirty (30) days prior to the end of the loan period the pledgee may make a declaration of intention to proceed with sale of the pawned item by sending notice of intent to the pledgor.
( d ) The notice required in paragraph (c) of this section shall be sent to the pledgor and proof of delivery obtained and shall contain a description of the item pawned, a statement of the principal and finance charge owed, a statement of the intention to sell, the date of the sale, and the procedure for redemption.
( e ) Nothing in this section requires the business owner to proceed with notice and sale if the business owner desires to hold the pawn for a period longer than the loan period stated in the original agreement.
( f ) Unless notice is given under paragraph (c) of this section, or the loan is refinanced under the provisions of § 141.41, no finance charge may be imposed for the time the loan remains unpaid after the end of the loan period stated on the pawn ticket.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS OF****CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**Section 906 Certifications**

 

In connection with the annual report for the year ended December 31, 2011 on Form 10-K (the “Annual Report”), of Hughes Satellite Systems Corporation (the “Company”) as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, we, Michael T. Dugan and Kenneth G. Carroll, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, respectively, of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of our knowledge:

 

(i)                     the Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(ii)                  the information contained in this Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date: March 30, 2012 |                                                                                  |
|---------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                      |                                                                                  |
|                      |                                                                                  |   |
| */s/ Michael T. Dugan*    |                                                                                  |
| Name:                     | Michael   T. Dugan                                                                    |   |
| Title:                    | Chief   Executive Officer, President and Director 

*(Principal   Executive Officer)* |   |
|                      |                                                                                  |   |
|                      |                                                                                  |   |
| */s/ Kenneth G. Carroll*  | * *                                                                              |
| Name:                     | Kenneth   G. Carroll                                                                  |   |
| Title:                    | Executive   Vice President and Chief Financial Officer                                |   |
| * *                  | *(Principal   Financial Officer)*                                                     | * * |

 

A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO THE COMPANY AND WILL BE RETAINED BY THE COMPANY AND FURNISHED TO THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.

 

----
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting
Firm



To the Board of Directors, PNC Financial Services Group, Inc.:



We have examined management’s assertion, included in the accompanying
Report on Assessment of Compliance with Regulation AB Servicing Criteria, that Midland Loan Services, a division of PNC Bank, National
Association (“Midland” or the “Company”) complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d)
of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB for the commercial mortgage-backed securities transactions (the
“Platform”), as of December 31, 2013 and for the year then ended, excluding criteria 1122(d)(1)(iii), 1122(d)(3)(i)(B),
1122(d)(3)(i)(C), 1122(d)(3)(i)(D), 1122(d)(3)(ii), 1122(d)(3)(iii), 1122(d)(3)(iv), and 1122(d)(4)(xv), which the Company has
determined are not applicable to the servicing activities performed by it with respect to the Platform. Management is responsible
for the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management’s
assertion based on our examination.



Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards
of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence
about the Company’s compliance with the applicable servicing criteria and performing such other procedures as we considered
necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing of selected asset-backed transactions and securities that comprise
the Platform, testing of selected servicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whether the Company processed those
selected transactions and performed those selected activities in compliance with the applicable servicing criteria. Our procedures
were limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report.
Our procedures were not designed to detect noncompliance arising from errors that may have occurred prior to or subsequent to our
tests that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report.
We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination
on the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria.



In our opinion, management’s assertion that Midland complied
with the aforementioned applicable servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2013 for the Platform is fairly
stated, in all material respects.





/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP



February 24, 2014



















PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, 1100 Walnut, Suite 1300, Kansas City,
MO 64106

T: (816) 472 7921, F: (816) 218 1890, www.pwc.com/us
### SUBCHAPTER I—ACQUISITION AND CROSS-SERVICING AGREEMENTS

Sec.
2341.
Authority to acquire logistic support, supplies, and services for elements of the armed forces deployed outside the United States.
2342.
Cross-servicing agreements.
2343.
Waiver of applicability of certain laws.
2344.
Methods of payment for acquisitions and transfers by the United States.
2345.
Liquidation of accrued credits and liabilities.
2346.
Crediting of receipts.
2347.
Limitation on amounts that may be obligated or accrued by the United States.
2348.
Inventories of supplies not to be increased.
2349.
Overseas Workload Program.
[2349a.
Repealed.]
2350.
Definitions.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**2013**—Pub. L. 112–239, div. A, title X, §1076(g)(3), Jan. 2, 2013, 126 Stat. 1955, struck out item 2349a "Annual report on non-NATO agreements".

**1994**—Pub. L. 103–337, div. A, title XIII, §1317(c)(2)(B), (i)(2), Oct. 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 2900, 2902, substituted "Waiver of applicability of certain laws" for "Law applicable to acquisition and cross-servicing agreements" in item 2343 and added item 2349a.

**1993**—Pub. L. 103–160, div. A, title XIV, §1431(a)(2), Nov. 30, 1993, 107 Stat. 1833, added item 2349.

**1990**—Pub. L. 101–510, div. A, title XIII, §1331(3), Nov. 5, 1990, 104 Stat. 1673, struck out item 2349 "Annual reports".

**1989**—Pub. L. 101–189, div. A, title IX, §931(a)(1), Nov. 29, 1989, 103 Stat. 1531, added subchapter heading.

**1986**—Pub. L. 99–661, div. A, title XI, §1104(g), Nov. 14, 1986, 100 Stat. 3965, substituted "elements of the armed forces deployed outside the United States" for "United States armed forces in Europe" in item 2341.

**1985**—Pub. L. 99–145, title XIII, §1304(a)(6), Nov. 8, 1985, 99 Stat. 742, renumbered items 2321 to 2328 as 2341 to 2348, respectively, and items 2330 and 2331 as 2349 and 2350, respectively, and struck out item 2329 "Regulations".
### §1551. Correction of name after separation from service under an assumed name

The Secretary of the military department concerned shall issue a certificate of discharge or an order of acceptance of resignation in the true name of any person who was separated from the Army, Navy, Air Force, Marine Corps, or Space Force honorably or under honorable conditions after serving under an assumed name during a war with another nation or people, upon application by, or on behalf of, that person, and upon proof of his identity. However, a certificate or order may not be issued under this section if the name was assumed to conceal a crime or to avoid its consequences.

(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 116; Pub. L. 116–283, div. A, title IX, §924(b)(3)(Y), Jan. 1, 2021, 134 Stat. 3821.)

| Revised section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1551 | 5:200.34:597. | Apr. 14, 1890, ch. 80; restated June 25, 1910, ch. 393, 36 Stat. 824. |
| | | Aug. 22, 1912, ch. 329, 37 Stat. 324. |

34:597.

The word "shall" is substituted for the words "is authorized and required". The word "separated" is substituted for the word "discharged", since the revised section covers acceptances of resignations as well as certificates of discharge. The words "enlisted or" and "while minors or otherwise" are omitted as surplusage. The words "the War of the Rebellion" are omitted as obsolete. The word "with" is substituted for the words "between the United States and". The words "honorably or under honorable conditions" are substituted for the word "honorably".

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2021—Pub. L. 116–283 substituted "Marine Corps, or Space Force" for "or Marine Corps".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Personnel Freeze for Service Review Agencies

Pub. L. 105–261, div. A, title V, §541, Oct. 17, 1998, 112 Stat. 2019, provided that, during fiscal years 1999, 2000, and 2001, the Secretary of a military department could not carry out any reduction in the number of military and civilian personnel assigned to duty with the service review agency for that military department below the baseline number for that agency until: (1) the Secretary had submitted to Congress a report that described the reduction to be made and the rationale for that reduction, and specified the number of such personnel that would be assigned to duty with that agency after the reduction; and (2) a period of 90 days had elapsed after the date on which such report had been submitted.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Joint Statement of the Quad Ministerial Meeting in New Delhi

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More
#### § 1000.210 When does a non-BIA bureau use a public consultation process related to the negotiation of an AFA?

When required by law or when appropriate under bureau discretion, a bureau may use a public consultation process in negotiating an AFA.
### **CHAPTER 701—DEFINITIONS**

Sec.
7001.
Definitions.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**2018**—Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, §808(e)(1), (f)(1), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1839, redesignated chapter 301 of this title as this chapter and item 3001 as 7001.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# U.S., Japan, Republic of Korea Conduct Trilateral Ballistic Missile Defense Exercise

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command Public Affairs

The Arleigh Burke-class guided-missile destroyer, USS John Finn (DDG 113) conducted a trilateral ballistic missile defense exercise on July, 16, alongside Japan Maritime Self-Defense Force Maya class destroyer JS Maya (DDG 179), and Republic of Korea Navy Se Jong Daewang class destroyer ROKS Yul Gog Yi I (DDG 992).

This exercise enhances the interoperability of our collective forces and demonstrates the strength of the trilateral relationship with our Allies Japan and Republic of Korea. This trilateral cooperation is reflective of our shared values and resolve against those who challenge regional stability.

We remain committed to peace and prosperity in the region to uphold a free and open Indo-Pacific.

 

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the
dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.
  By:
    
    /s/ Philip Cook
    
    By:
    
    /s/ Glenn DardenPhilip Cook
    
    
    
    Glenn DardenSenior Vice President  Chief Financial Officer
    
    
    
    President and Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 34.6







Report of Independent Registered Public
Accounting Firm







To the Board of Directors

National Tax Search, LLC





We have examined management's assertion,
included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Assessment of Compliance with Securities and Exchange Commission’s
Regulation AB Servicing Criteria, that National Tax Search, LLC (the “Company”) complied with certain servicing criteria
set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Security and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB for the National Tax Search TaxQ system
(the “Platform”) as of and for the year ended December 31, 2011. The Company has determined that only certain servicing
criteria 1122(d)(l)(ii), 1122(d)1(iv), 1122(d)2(ii), 1122(d)2(v), 1122(d)2(vi), 1122(d)2(vii), 1122(d)(4)(xi), and 1122(d)(4)(xii)
are applicable to the activities performed by it with respect to the Platform covered by this report. The Company has determined
that the remaining servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the SEC Regulation AB are not applicable to the activities performed
by it with respect to the Platform covered by this report.



Management is responsible for the Company's
compliance with those servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion about the Company's
compliance with the servicing criteria based on our examination. Our examination was conducted in accordance with standards of
the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about
the Company's compliance with the applicable servicing criteria and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary
in the circumstances. Our examination included selection of a sample of transactions and compliance activities related to the Platform
during the examination period and determining whether the Company processed those transactions and performed those activities in
compliance with the servicing criteria. Our testing of selected transactions and compliance activities was limited to calculations,
reports, and activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report. Our procedures did not include determining
whether errors may have occurred prior to our tests that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the
Company during the period covered by this report for the selected transactions or any other transactions. We believe that our examination
provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company’s compliance
with the servicing criteria.



In our opinion, management's assertion
that the Company complied with the aforementioned servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2011 for the Platform
is fairly stated in all material respects.





/s/ Plante & Moran, PLLC







Chicago, IL

January 16, 2012