alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
p.1 

OAR Box 1828 

Prepped by Ollie Stewart 

Document Number: 

239) ll-K- (I) -52 

Docket Number: 

A-83-27 

Printed 11/12/2008 11:12:56 AM Sheet 239 of 325 
P.2 

y\\ Pl 

H-K-(I)-52 

ANALYSIS OF FOURTH AND FIFTH ROUND TEST CASES. 

EEA, Inc. 

May 1, 1980. 

THIS INFORMATION CAN BE FOUND IN DOCKET A-79-02, ITEM 

II-K-(I)-52
§ 103.16 How does BIA approve or reject a loan guaranty or insurance application? ( a ) BIA reviews each guaranty or insurance application, and may evaluate each loan application independently from the lender. BIA bases its loan guaranty or insurance decisions on many factors, including compliance with this part, and whether there is a reasonable prospect of loan repayment from business cash flow, or if necessary, from liquidating loan collateral. Lenders are expected to obtain a first lien security interest in enough collateral to reasonably secure repayment of each loan guaranteed or insured under the Program, to the extent that collateral is available.
( b ) BIA approves applications by issuing an approval letter, followed by the procedures in § 103.18. If the guaranty or insurance application is incomplete, BIA may return the application to the lender, or hold the application while the lender submits the missing information. If BIA denies the application, it will provide the lender with a written explanation, with a copy to the borrower.
§ 601.14 Commission actions generally eligible for an Environmental Assessment. Commission actions that typically require preparation of an EA include without limitation: ( a ) Approval of final plans for Federal public buildings in the District of Columbia, and the provisions for open space in and around the same, pursuant to 40 U.S.C. 8722(d) and D.C. Code 2-1004(c).
( b ) Approval of final plans for District of Columbia public buildings and the open space around them within the Central Area pursuant to 40 U.S.C. 8722(e) and D.C. Code 2-1004(d).
( c ) Recommendations to a Federal or District of Columbia agency on any master plan or master plan modification submitted to the Commission that include proposed future projects that require Commission approval pursuant to 40 U.S.C. 8722(d)-(e) and D.C. Code 2-1004(c)-(d) within a five-year timeframe.
( d ) Approval of a final site and design for a commemorative work authorized under the Commemorative Works Act pursuant to 40 U.S.C. 8905.
( e ) Approval of transfers of jurisdiction over properties within the District of Columbia owned by the United States or the District among or between Federal and District authorities, pursuant to 40 U.S.C. 8124, unless such transfers met the criteria of § 601.12(a)(7).
§ 11.208 May Individual Indian Money accounts be used for payment of judgments? ( a ) Any Court of Indian Offenses may make application to the superintendent who administers the individual Indian money account of a defendant who has failed to satisfy a money judgment from the court to obtain payment of the judgment from funds in the defendant's account. The court shall certify the record of the case to the superintendent. If the superintendent so directs, the disbursing agent shall pay over to the injured party the amount of the judgment or such lesser amount as may be specified by the superintendent.
( b ) A judgment of a Court of Indian Offenses shall be considered a lawful debt in all proceedings held by the Department of the Interior or by a Court of Indian Offenses to distribute decedents' estates.
## Subpart A—General

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, §801(a), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1826, added subpart heading.
January 16, 2015

Mr. Ian Cotita CAVU Media, LLC 1228 Baronne Street, Unit B New Orleans, LA 70113

Mr. Donald J. Melancon, Esq. The Law Offices of Mr. Donald J. Melancon, LLC 2200 Belle Chasse Highway Gretna, LA 70053

Dear Messrs. Cotita and Melancon:

This is in response to your June 25, 2014, letter sent to the docket (No. FAA-2014-0520) petitioning the Federal Aviation Administrati on (FAA) on behalf of CAVU Media, LLC (CAVU) for an exemption from part 21; §§ 45.23(b); 61.113(a) and (b); 91.7(a); 91.9(b)(2); 91.103(b); 91.109; 91.119; 91.121; 91.151(a); 91.203(a) and (b); 91.405(a); 91.407(a)(1); 91.409(a)(2); and 91.417(a) and (b) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). That exemption, if granted, would allow CAVU to conduct aerial photography, using an unmanned aerial system, for closed-set filming in the motion picture and television industry.

By email dated November 24, 2014, which posted to the docket November 25, the FAA sent you a request for additional information asking you to provide a copy of your confidential motion picture and television operations manual, as was described in your petition for exemption as ‘Exhibit 1’ on page 3. You were given a due date of December 8, 2014, to provide this information to the FAA. Thus far, the FAA has not received the required information to continue with processing your exemption request.2 Because your petition lacks sufficient information to proceed, the FAA has closed your exemption request. Should you wish to provide the additional information please resubmit your petition for exemption to the public docket.

Sincerely,

/s/

Lirio Liu

Director Office of Rulemaking
§ 11.305 Search warrants. ( a ) Each magistrate of a Court of Indian Offenses shall have the authority to issue a warrant for the search of premises and for the seizure of physical evidence of a criminal violation under the regulations of this part located within the Indian country over which the court has jurisdiction.
( b ) No warrant for search or seizure may be issued unless it is based on a written and signed statement establishing, to the satisfaction of the magistrate, that probable cause exists to believe that the search will lead to discovery of evidence of a criminal violation under the regulations of this part.
( c ) No warrant for search or seizure shall be valid unless it contains the name or description of the person, vehicle, or premises to be searched, describes the evidence to be seized, and bears the signature of the magistrate who issued it.
( d ) Warrants may be executed only by a BIA or tribal police officer or other official commissioned to enforce the regulations under this part. The executing officer shall return the warrant to the Court of Indian Offenses within the time limit shown on the face of the warrant, which in no case shall be longer than ten (10) days from the date of issuance. Warrants not returned within such time limits shall be void.
§ 11.316 Probation. ( a ) Where a sentence of imprisonment has been imposed on a convicted offender, the Court of Indian Offenses may, in its discretion, suspend the serving of such sentence and release the person on probation under any reasonable conditions deemed appropriate by the court, provided that the period of probation shall not exceed one year.
( b ) Any person who violates the terms of his or her probation may be required by the court to serve the sentence originally imposed or such part of it as the court may determine to be suitable giving consideration to all the circumstances, provided that such revocation of probation shall not be ordered without a hearing before the court at which the offender shall have the opportunity to explain his or her actions.
EXHIBIT 32


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, the
undersigned officer of Rosewood Acquisition Corporation
 (the "Company"), hereby certify to my knowledge that:

The Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2011 of the Company fully complies, in all material respects,
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the
Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by
the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.


                             /s/ James Cassidy
                                 Chief Executive Officer
                                 Chief Financial Officer
 				 For the Period Covered by
				 the Report
Date: March 28, 2012
```

[Federal Register: October 14, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 198)]
[Notices]               
[Page 63255]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr14oc10-138]                         

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

 
Air Traffic Procedures Advisory Committee Meeting

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

SUMMARY: The FAA is issuing this notice to advise the public that a 
meeting of the Federal Aviation Administration Air Traffic Procedures 
Advisory Committee (ATPAC) will be held to review present air traffic 
control procedures and practices for standardization, revision, 
clarification, and upgrading of terminology and procedures.

DATES: The meeting will be held Tuesday, October 26, and Wednesday 
October 27, 2010 from 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at Gaylord National Resort, and 
Convention Center, 201 Waterfront St., National Harbor, MD 20745.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Richard Jehlen, ATPAC Executive 
Director, 800 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20591. Telephone 
(202) 493-4527.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463; 5 U.S.C. App.2), notice is 
hereby given of a meeting of the ATPAC to be held Tuesday, October 26, 
and Wednesday, October 27, 2010, from 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    The agenda for this meeting will cover a continuation of the 
ATPAC's review of present air traffic control procedures and practices 
for standardization, revision, clarification, and upgrading of 
terminology and procedures. It will also include:
    1. Approval of Minutes;
    2. Submission and Discussion of Areas of Concern;
    3. Discussion of Potential Safety Items;
    4. Report from Executive Director;
    5. Items of Interest; and
    6. Discussion and agreement of location and dates for subsequent 
meetings.
    Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space 
available. With the approval of the Chairperson, members of the public 
may present oral statements at the meeting. Persons desiring to attend 
and persons desiring to present oral statements should notify Mr. 
Richard Jehlen no later than October 19, 2010. Any member of the public 
may present a written statement to the ATPAC at any time at the address 
given above.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on October 6, 2010.
Richard Jehlen,
Executive Director, Air Traffic Procedures Advisory Committee.
[FR Doc. 2010-25838 Filed 10-13-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
```
#### STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff, vs. LORETTA MAE HINDAHL, Defendant.

DECISION

No. 3579

DATED this 13th day of May, 1977.

The application of the above-named defendant for a review of the sentence of Five years concurrently imposed on December 15, 1976, was fully heard and after a careful consideration of the entire matter it is decided that:

The sentence be and remain as originally imposed.

We wish to thank John Jardine, Attorney from Whitehall, for his assistance to the defendant and this Court.

SENTENCE REVIEW DIVISION

Jack L. Green, Chairman; Peter G. Meloy.
#### § 1000.438 May Tribes/Consortia appeal Department decisions to a Federal court?

Yes, Tribes/Consortia may appeal decisions of Department officials relating to the self-governance program to an appropriate Federal court, as authorized by section 110 of Pub. L. 93-638 (25 U.S.C. 405m-1), or any other applicable law.
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 927

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the annual exclusion

from the gift tax to $20,000.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 2, 1999

Mr. MCINNIS (for himself, Mr. HOUGHTON, Ms. DUNN, Mr. ENGLISH, Mr.

HAYWORTH, Mr. LEWIS of Kentucky, Mr. WATKINS, Mr. FOLEY, Mr.

TANCREDO, and Mr. SHOWS) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase

the annual exclusion from the gift tax to $20,000.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Family Savings Rescue

5 Act of 1999’’.

6 SEC. 2. ANNUAL GIFT TAX EXCLUSION INCREASED TO

7 $20,000.

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (b) of section 2503 of

9 the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to exclusions
2

•HR 927 IH

1 from gifts) is amended by striking ‘‘$10,000’’ each place

2 it appears and inserting ‘‘$20,000’’.

3 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Paragraph (2) of

4 section 2503(b) of such Code is amended—

5 (1) by striking ‘‘after 1998’’ and inserting

6 ‘‘after 2000’’, and

7 (2) by striking ‘‘calendar year 1997’’ and in8 serting ‘‘calendar year 1999’’.

9 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

10 this section shall apply to transfers made after December

11 31, 1999.

Æ
106TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 898 

AN ACT 

Designating certain land in the San Isabel National 

Peaks Wilderness’’. Forest in the State of Colorado as the ‘‘Spanish 


erjones on PROD1PC71 with BILLS

erjones on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
106TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 898 

AN ACT 

Designating certain land in the San Isabel National Forest 

in the State of Colorado as the ‘‘Spanish Peaks Wilderness’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


erjones on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•HR 898 EH 

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Spanish Peaks Wilder3 ness Act of 1999’’. 

4 SEC. 2. DESIGNATION OF SPANISH PEAKS WILDERNESS. 

5 (a) COLORADO WILDERNESS ACT.—Section 2(a) of 

6 the Colorado Wilderness Act of 1993 (Public Law 103– 

7 77; 107 Stat. 756; 16 U.S.C. 1132 note) is amended by 

8 adding at the end the following: 

9 ‘‘(20) SPANISH PEAKS WILDERNESS.—Certain 

10 land in the San Isabel National Forest that— 

11 ‘‘(A) comprises approximately 18,000 

12 acres, as generally depicted on a map entitled 

13 ‘Proposed Spanish Peaks Wilderness’, dated 

14 February 10, 1999; and 

15 ‘‘(B) shall be known as the ‘Spanish Peaks 

16 Wilderness’.’’. 

17 (b) MAP; BOUNDARY DESCRIPTION.— 

18 (1) FILING.—As soon as practicable after the 

19 date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Agri20 culture (referred to in this Act as the ‘‘Secretary’’), 

21 shall file a map and boundary description of the 

22 area designated under subsection (a) with— 

23 (A) the Committee on Resources of the 

24 House of Representatives; and 

25 (B) the Committee on Energy and Natural 

26 Resources of the Senate. 


erjones on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
3 

•HR 898 EH 

1 (2) FORCE AND EFFECT.—The map and bound2 ary description under paragraph (1) shall have the 

3 same force and effect as if included in the Colorado 

4 Wilderness Act of 1993 (Public Law 103–77; 107 

5 Stat. 756), except that the Secretary may correct 

6 clerical and typographical errors in the map and 

7 boundary description. 

8 (3) AVAILABILITY.—The map and boundary de9 scription under paragraph (1) shall be on file and 

10 available for public inspection in the Office of the 

11 Chief of the Forest Service. 

12 SEC. 3. ACCESS. 

13 Within the Spanish Peaks Wilderness designated 

14 under section 2— 

15 (1) the Secretary shall allow the continuation of 

16 historic uses of the Bulls Eye Mine Road established 

17 prior to the date of enactment of this Act, subject 

18 to such terms and conditions as the Secretary may 

19 provide; and 

20 (2) access to any privately owned land within 

21 the wilderness areas designated under section 2 shall 

22 be provided in accordance with section 5 of the Wil23 derness Act (16 U.S.C. 1134 et seq.). 


erjones on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
4 

•HR 898 EH 

1 SEC. 4. CONFORMING AMENDMENTS. 

2 Section 10 of the Colorado Wilderness Act of 1993 

3 (Public Law 103–77; 107 Stat. 756; 16 U.S.C. 1132 note) 

4 is repealed. 

Passed the House of Representatives September 13, 

1999. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 


erjones on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 31 (Tuesday, February 15, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 8772-8773]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-3460]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[USITC SE-11-004]


Government in the Sunshine Act Meeting Notice

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: United States International Trade 
Commission.

TIME AND DATE: February 16, 2011 at 11 a.m.

PLACE: Room 110, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, Telephone: 
(202) 205-2000.

STATUS: Open to the public.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 1. Agenda for future meetings: none.
    2. Minutes.
    3. Ratification List.
    4. Vote in Inv. No. 731-TA-298 (Third Review) (Porcelain-on-Steel

[[Page 8773]]

Cooking Ware from China). The Commission is currently scheduled to 
transmit its determination and Commissioners' opinions to the Secretary 
of Commerce on or before February 28, 2011.
    5. Outstanding action jackets:
    (1.) Document No. GC-10-281 concerning Inv. No. 337-TA-722 (Certain 
Automotive Vehicles and Designs Therefore).
    (2.) Document No. GC-11-011 concerning Inv. No. 337-TA-568 (Certain 
Products and Pharmaceutical Compositions Containing Recombinant Human 
Erythropoetin).
    (3.) Document No. GC-11-013 concerning Inv. No. 337-TA-587 (Remand) 
(Certain Connecting Devices (``Quick Clamps'') for Use with Modular 
Compressed Air Conditioning Units, Including Filters, Regulators, and 
Lubricators (``FRL's'') That are Part of Larger Pneumatic Systems and 
the FRL Units They Connect).
    In accordance with Commission policy, subject matter listed above, 
not disposed of at the scheduled meeting, may be carried over to the 
agenda of the following meeting. Earlier Notification of this meeting 
was not possible.

    By order of the Commission.
    Issued: February 10, 2011.
William R. Bishop,
Hearings and Meetings Coordinator.
[FR Doc. 2011-3460 Filed 2-11-11; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# U.S. Indo-Pacific Commander Travels to Papua New Guinea

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command Public Affairs

PORT MORESBY, Papua New Guinea -- Admiral John C. Aquilino, Commander of U.S. Indo-Pacific Command, traveled to Papua New Guinea January 29-30 to underscore the U.S. commitment to advance shared interests toward building a more peaceful, stable, and prosperous Indo-Pacific region.During his visit Aquilino, joined by Joe Zadrozny, Chargé d’Affaires to Papua New Guinea, Solomon Islands, and Vanuatu, met with John Rosso, Papua New Guinea Deputy Prime Minister, Win Bakri Daki, Minister for Defence, Hari John Akipe, Secretary for Defence, and Maj. Gen. Mark Goina, Chief of Defence Force. Additionally he met with Justin Tkatchenko, Minister for Foreign Affairs, and Ivan Pomaleu, Chief Secretary at the new U.S. embassy facility in Port Moresby.

This trip marked Aquilino’s first visit to Papua New Guinea as Commander of U.S. Indo-Pacific Command and underscores the importance of the U.S.-Papua New Guinea relationship.

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More