alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 22.7 Codification.

Any part of a proposed rule document that contains the full text of a proposed regulation shall also conform to the pertinent provisions of part 21 of this chapter.

[37 FR 23614, Nov. 4, 1972, as amended at 54 FR 9683, Mar. 7, 1989]
PUBLIC LAW 115–89—NOV. 21, 2017 131 STAT. 1279 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 3949: 

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 115–398 (Comm. on Veterans’ Affairs). 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 163 (2017): 

Nov. 7, considered and passed House. 

Nov. 15, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

Public Law 115–89 

115th Congress 

An Act 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide for the designation of State 

approving agencies for multi-State apprenticeship programs for purposes of the 

educational assistance programs of the Department of Veterans Affairs. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Veterans Apprenticeship and 

Labor Opportunity Reform Act’’ or the ‘‘VALOR Act’’. 

SEC. 2. DESIGNATION OF STATE APPROVING AGENCIES FOR MULTISTATE APPRENTICESHIP PROGRAMS. 

Paragraph (1) of subsection (c) of section 3672 of title 38, 

United States Code, is amended to read as follows: 

‘‘(1)(A) The State approving agency for a multi-State apprenticeship program is— 

‘‘(i) for purposes of approval of the program, the State 

approving agency for the State in which the headquarters of 

the apprenticeship program is located; and 

‘‘(ii) for all other purposes, the State approving agency 

for the State in which the apprenticeship program takes place. 

‘‘(B) In this paragraph, the term ‘multi-State apprenticeship 

program’ means a non-Federal apprenticeship program operating 

in more than one State that meets the minimum national program 

standards, as developed by the Department of Labor.’’. 

SEC. 3. ELIMINATION OF CERTAIN CERTIFICATION REQUIREMENT FOR 

ASSISTANCE FOR APPRENTICESHIP AND OTHER ON-JOB 

TRAINING. 

Section 3680(c) of title 38, United States Code, is amended 

by striking ‘‘shall have received—’’ and all that follows through 

‘‘person’s certificate,’’ and inserting ‘‘receives from the training 

establishment a certification’’. 

Approved November 21, 2017. 

Veterans 

Apprenticeship 

and Labor 

Opportunity 

Reform Act. 

38 USC 101 note. 

Nov. 21, 2017 

[H.R. 3949]
```

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 34 (Friday, February 20, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 9267]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-03463]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-9922-98-Region 6]

Underground Injection Control Program; Hazardous Waste Injection 
Restrictions; Petition for Exemption Reissuance--Class I Hazardous 
Waste Injection; Lucite International, Inc. Beaumont Site, Nederland, 
TX

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of a final decision on a no migration petition 
reissuance.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a reissuance of an exemption to 
the land disposal Restrictions, under the 1984 Hazardous and Solid 
Waste Amendments to the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, has 
been granted to Lucite International, Inc. for two Class I hazardous 
injection wells located at their Beaumont site located in Nederland, 
TX. The company has adequately demonstrated to the satisfaction of the 
Environmental Protection Agency by the petition reissuance application 
and supporting documentation that, to a reasonable degree of certainty, 
there will be no migration of hazardous constituents from the injection 
zone for as long as the waste remains hazardous. This final decision 
allows the continued underground injection by Lucite, of the specific 
restricted hazardous wastes identified in this exemption reissuance, 
into Class I hazardous waste injection wells WDW-100 & 101 until 
December 31, 2030, unless EPA moves to terminate this exemption. 
Additional conditions included in this final decision may be reviewed 
by contacting the Region 6 Ground Water/UIC Section. A public notice 
was issued December 18, 2014. The public comment period closed on 
February 2, 2015. No comments were received. This decision constitutes 
final Agency action and there is no Administrative appeal. This 
decision may be reviewed/appealed in compliance with the Administrative 
Procedure Act.

DATES: This action is effective as of February 5, 2015.

ADDRESSES: Copies of the petition reissuance and all pertinent 
information relating thereto are on file at the following location: 
Environmental Protection Agency, Region 6, Water Quality Protection 
Division, Source Water Protection Branch (6WQ-S), 1445 Ross Avenue, 
Dallas, Texas 75202-2733.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Philip Dellinger, Chief Ground Water/
UIC Section, EPA--Region 6, telephone (214) 665-8324.

    Dated: February 5, 2015.
William K. Honker,
Director, Water Quality Protection Division.
[FR Doc. 2015-03463 Filed 2-19-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
```
#### Grafton Rogers v. The State.

No. 22956.

Delivered November 15, 1944.

The opinion states the case.

*Tom Sanders*and *John R. Francis,*both of Houston, for appellant.

*Ernest S. Goens,*State’s Attorney, of Austin, for the State,

GRAVES, Judge.

*603Appellant was properly charged with driving and operating an automobile upon a public highway in Harris County, Texas, while intoxicated, and upon a plea of not guilty before the court he was assessed-a fine of fifty dollars, from which judgment of the court he appeals.

There are no bills of exceptions in the record, and only one witness was heard by the court. Such witness showed that appellant was steering an automobile, while intoxicated, upon a public highway in such county; it was also shown that such automobile’s engine was not running but that it was being pushed by another car.

The only question presented by the facts seems to be whether a car being pushed by another car, being steered by an intoxicated person, comes within the meaning of the punitive statute, Vernon’s Ann. P. C. Art. 802, which prohibits such intoxicated person “driving and operating a motor vehicle.”

Volume 5, American Jurisprudence, p. 918, Sec. 772, lays down the following doctrine:

> “* * * An automobile unable to proceed under its own power, which is being towed, is a ‘motor vehicle’ within the meaning of a statute making it an offense to operate a motor- vehicle while intoxicated, and providing that the term ‘motor vehicle’ shall include all vehicles propelled by power other than muscular power.”

The text' cites but one case, State v. Tracey, 102 Vermont, 439, 150 Atl. 68, 68 A. L. R 1353.

We think appellant, who was guiding this automobile in motion, the engine of which was not running, was guilty of operating the same, and his intoxication was proven and undisputed.

The judgment is affirmed.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 15.1



August 3, 2001

Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20549

Commissioners:

We are aware that our report dated August 2, 2001 on our review of interim
financial information of Critical Path, Inc. (the "Company") as of and for the
period ended June 30, 2001 and included in the Company's quarterly report on
Form 10-Q for the quarter then ended is incorporated by reference in the
Company's Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-63080, 333-51504,
333-44418, 333-36228, 333-95279, 333-95933, 333-40476, 333-87553) and on Form
S-3 (Nos. 333-39958, 333-38006, 333-38000, 333-36382).

Very truly yours,

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers, LLP
### §1563a. Honorary promotions on the initiative of the Department of Defense

(a) In General.—(1) Under regulations prescribed by the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary may make an honorary promotion (whether or not posthumous) of a former member or retired member of the armed forces to any grade not exceeding the grade of major general or rear admiral (upper half) if the Secretary determines that the promotion is merited.

(2) The authority to make an honorary promotion under this subsection shall apply notwithstanding that the promotion is not otherwise authorized by law.

(b) Notice to Congress.—The Secretary may not make an honorary promotion pursuant to subsection (a) until 60 days after the date on which the Secretary submits to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a notice of the determination to make the promotion, including a detailed discussion of the rationale supporting the determination.

(c) Notice of Promotion.—Upon making an honorary promotion pursuant to subsection (a), the Secretary shall expeditiously notify the former member or retired member concerned, or the next of kin of such former member or retired member if such former member or retired member is deceased, of the promotion.

(d) Nature of Promotion.—Any promotion pursuant to this section is honorary, and shall not affect the pay, retired pay, or other benefits from the United States to which the former member or retired member concerned is entitled or would have been entitled based on the military service of such former member or retired member, nor affect any benefits to which any other person is or may become entitled based on the military service of such former member or retired member.

(Added Pub. L. 116–283, div. A, title V, §523(a), Jan. 1, 2021, 134 Stat. 3597; amended Pub. L. 118–31, div. A, title XVII, §1741(a)(6), Dec. 22, 2023, 137 Stat. 680.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2023—Subsec. (a)(1). Pub. L. 118–31 substituted "general or" for "general," and struck out ", or an equivalent grade in the Space Force" after "rear admiral (upper half)".
#### Frank L. Tyson v. Board of Education.

Motion denied, with ten dollars costs.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

**JTF - Micronesia Menu**

                        - JTF-M Leadership
                        - JTF-M Press Room                            - News
                          - Stories
                          More
                        - JTF-M Documents
                        - JTF-M Contact Us

# Readout of Secretary of Defense Lloyd J. Austin III Call with Singapore Minister for Defence Ng Eng Hen

By Attributed to Pentagon Press Secretary Brigadier General Pat RyderDOD Release

WASHINGTON -- Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin III spoke with Singapore's Minister for Defence Ng Eng Hen by phone Oct. 27 to discuss regional security issues and mutual efforts to strengthen defense cooperation.The two leaders exchanged views on the security environment in the Indo-Pacific region, including shared concerns about the potential for escalation of regional tensions and the need for open communication. Secretary Austin noted his appreciation for the access Singapore provides to U.S. forces, noting that Singapore is one of the United States' most valued defense partners in the region. Both leaders reaffirmed their mutual commitment to the U.S.-Singapore bilateral defense relationship.The two leaders reiterated that the partnership between the United States and Singapore is built on common principles. Secretary Austin expressed his appreciation for Singapore's leadership in Southeast Asia; both leaders look forward to upcoming U.S.-ASEAN engagements later this year. The Secretary and Minister Ng closed the call by underscoring their mutual commitment to supporting the security, stability, and prosperity of the Indo-Pacific region.

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

# Royal Australian Navy Fellow Visits Center for Information Dominance

By Thom Seith, Center for Information Dominance Public Affairs 

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More News/Articles
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 3 (Thursday, January 5, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 530]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-33837]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration <greek-i>12976 and <greek-i>12977]


Alaska Disaster <greek-i> AK-00022

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is a Notice of the Presidential declaration of a major 
disaster for Public Assistance Only for the State of Alaska (FEMA-4050-
DR), dated 12/22/2011.
    Incident: Severe Winter Storms and Flooding.
    Incident Period: 11/08/2011 through 11/10/2011
    Effective Date: 12/22/2011.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 02/21/2012.
    Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date: 09/24/2012.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW., 
Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of 
the President's major disaster declaration on 12/22/2011, Private Non-
Profit organizations that provide essential services of governmental 
nature may file disaster loan applications at the address listed above 
or other locally announced locations.
    The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected 
by the disaster:

Primary Counties: Bering Strait REAA, Lower Kuskokwim REAA, Lower Yukon 
REAA, North Slope Borough, Southwest Region REAA.

    The Interest Rates are:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                Percent
------------------------------------------------------------------------
For Physical Damage:
  Non-Profit Organizations with Credit Available Elsewhere...      3.125
  Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere      3.000
For Economic Injury:
  Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere      3.000
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 12976B 
and for economic injury is 12977B.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008)

James E. Rivera,
Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2011-33837 Filed 1-4-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
### §12317. Reserves: theological students; limitations

A Reserve may not be required to serve on active duty, or to participate in inactive duty training, while preparing for the ministry in a recognized theological or divinity school.

(Added Pub. L. 85–861, §1(15), Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1441, §685; renumbered §12317, Pub. L. 103–337, div. A, title XVI, §1662(e)(2), Oct. 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 2992.)

| Revised section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 686 | 50:961(h) (last sentence). | Aug. 9, 1955, ch. 665, §2(g) (last sentence), 69 Stat. 599. |

The words "active training and service, active duty for training" are omitted as covered by the words "active duty" as defined in section 101(22) of this title.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1994—Pub. L. 103–337 renumbered section 685 of this title as this section.
Exhibit 32

  Certification of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer
                       Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
                             as Adopted Pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

The undersigned, the Principal Executive Officer (CEO) and the Principal
Financial Officer (Chief Financial Officer) of Millenia Hope Inc. (the
"Company"), each hereby certifies that to his knowledge on the date hereof:

          (a)  The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the period
               ended August 31, 2007, filed on the date hereof with the
               Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report") fully complies
               with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the
               Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (b)  Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
               material respects, the financial condition and results of
               operations of the Company.


Date: October 9,2007



                                                    /s/ Leonard Stella
                                           -------------------------------------
                                                    Leonard Stella
                                                    Chief Executive Officer


Date: October 9,2007



                                                    /s/ Hugo Valente
                                           -------------------------------------
                                                    Hugo Valente
                                                    Chief Financial Officer


This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed
by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended.
§ 162.008 Does this part apply to lease documents I submitted for approval before January 4, 2013? This part applies to all lease documents, except as provided in § 162.006. If you submitted your lease document to us for approval before January 4, 2013, the qualifications in paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section also apply. ( a ) If we approved your lease document before January 4, 2013, this part applies to that lease document; however, if the provisions of the lease document conflict with this part, the provisions of the lease govern.
( b ) If you submitted a lease document but we did not approve it before January 4, 2013, then: ( 1 ) We will review the lease document under the regulations in effect at the time of your submission; and
( 2 ) Once we approve the lease document, this part applies to that lease document; however, if the provisions of the lease document conflict with this part, the provisions of the lease document govern.
'arraguirre J.

judgment as final pursuant to NRCP 54(b). NRAP 3A(b)(1); NRAP 3A(b)(8); 

### Lee v. GNLV Corp., 116 Nev. 424, 996 P.2d 416 (2000). The following appeared to remain pending below: respondent's claim for a deficiency judgment against appellant South Strip Partnership II. We noted that, while the district court's order awarded a judgment against the guarantor appellants, the judgment did not mention the borrower, South Strip Partnership II.

In its January 23, 2013, response to our show cause order, respondent City National Bank indicates that, while judgment was orally rendered against South Strip Partnership II, that entity's name was inadvertently omitted from the judgment. City National Bank asks this court to stay the appeal and/or remand the matter to the district court to correct the judgment. No certification or other indication of the district court's inclination to grant relief was attached. To date, appellants have not responded to our show cause order, and it appears that no further filings or proceedings have occurred in the district court. Accordingly, as no written judgment or other order formally disposing of the claims against South Strip Partnership II has been entered, no final judgment exists. 

### Lee, 116 Nev. 424, 996 P.2d 416. Since no final judgment exists, the district court retains jurisdiction, and no remand is necessary. As we lack jurisdiction, we

ORDER these appeals DISMISSED.



## AAA

, J. Hardesty

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA

(0) 1947A 2

lijaZ

### cc: Hon. Douglas W. Herndon, District Judge Robert F. Saint-Aubin, Settlement Judge Ales & Bryson Holland & Hart LLP/Las Vegas Eighth District Court Clerk

3