alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §14109. Reports of promotion boards: in general

(a) Report of Officers Recommended for Promotion.—Each promotion board convened under section 14101(a) of this title shall submit to the Secretary of the military department concerned a report in writing containing a list of the names of the officers recommended by the board for promotion. The report shall be signed by each member of the board.

(b) Certification.—Each report under subsection (a) shall include a certification—

(1) that the board has carefully considered the record of each officer whose name was furnished to the board; and

(2) that, in the case of a promotion board convened under section 14101(a) of this title, in the opinion of a majority of the members of the board, the officers recommended for promotion by the board are best qualified for promotion to meet the needs of the armed force concerned (as noted in the guidelines or information furnished the board under section 14107 of this title) among those officers whose names were furnished to the selection board.

(c) Show-Cause Recommendations.—(1) A promotion board convened under section 14101(a) of this title shall include in its report to the Secretary concerned the name of any reserve officer before it for consideration for promotion whose record, in the opinion of a majority of the members of the board, indicates that the officer should be required to show cause for retention in an active status.

(2) If such a report names an officer as having a record which indicates that the officer should be required to show cause for retention, the Secretary concerned may provide for the review of the record of that officer as provided under regulations prescribed under section 14902 of this title.

(d) Report of Officers Recommended for Higher Placement on Promotion List.—A promotion board convened under section 14101(a) of this title shall, when authorized under section 14108(f) of this title, include in its report to the Secretary concerned—

(1) the names of those officers the promotion board recommends be placed higher on the promotion list; and

(2) the order in which the promotion board recommends those officers should be placed on the promotion list.

(Added Pub. L. 103–337, div. A, title XVI, §1611, Oct. 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 2928; amended Pub. L. 116–92, div. A, title V, §510(b), Dec. 20, 2019, 133 Stat. 1347.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

Provisions similar to those in subsecs. (a) and (b) of this section were contained in section 5897 of this title, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 103–337, §1629(b)(2).

#### Amendments

2019—Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 116–92 added subsec. (d).

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Oct. 1, 1996, see section 1691(b)(1) of Pub. L. 103–337, set out as a note under section 10001 of this title.
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

OFFICE OF ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND RENEWABLE ENERGY

PUBLIC WORKSHOP ON RESIDENTIAL FURNACE AND BOILER VENTING

PLACE OF WORKSHOP: FORRESTAL BUILDING

1000 INDEPENDENCE AVENUE, SW

ROOM I E-245

WASHINGTON, DC 20585

TELEPHONE: 202-586-9127

TELEFAX : 202-586-4617

DATE AND TIME: WEDNESDAY, MAY 8, 2002

9:00 k.M. - 5 : 00 P.M.

PURPOSE OF THE WORKSHOP

The purpose of this public workshop is to I tear the views and comments of interested

persons on issues related to residential furnace and boiler venting installation, present

data collected and to discuss issues concerning venting systems.

DRAFT AGENDA

9:00-9 :15 OPENING REMARKS AND INTRODUCTIONS

9:15-9:30 AGENDA REVIEW

9:30-12:00 .'RESIDENTIAL FURNACE AND BOILER VENTING

9:30-9:45 Introduction

9:45-10:00 NFGC Background

10:00-10:30 Difference Between Steady State Efficiency (SSE) and Annual

Fuel Utilization Efficiency (AFUE)

Discussion

10:30-10:45 Break

10:45-11:10 Additional Venting Issues

Discussion

11.10-11:20 NFGC Tables at Higher SSE's

11.20-11:30 Technology Options

Discussion

11.30-12:00 Q&A

12:00-1:00 LUNCH

1:00-2 :45 STAKEHOLDER PRESENTATIONS

2:45-3:00 BREAK

3:00-3:45 OPEN DISCUSSION

3:45-4:00 CLOSING REMARKS

ADJOURNMENT

EE-RM/STD-01-350 COMMENT 25AA
EXHIBIT 32
Section 1350 Certifications

                          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                           18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                           AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Report of Bravo! Foods International, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Roy G. Warren, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C., Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

August 15, 2005                        /S/ Roy G. Warren
                                       -----------------------
                                       Roy G. Warren
                                       Chief Executive Officer


                          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                           18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                           AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Report of Bravo! Foods International, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Tommy E. Kee, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C., Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

August 15, 2005                        /S/ Tommy E. Kee
                                       -----------------------
                                       Tommy E. Kee
                                       Chief Financial Officer


<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 32.2
 
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 (AS ADOPTED
 PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
 SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)
 
 In connection with the Quarterly Report of General Metals Corporation  (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended January 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Daniel J. Forbush, Chief Financial Officer, certify to my knowledge and in my capacity as an officer of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and,
 
 2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.
 
 Date:  March 14, 2011
 
 /s/ Daniel J. ForbushDaniel J. ForbushChief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial Officer and Principal

Accounting Officer
 
  The foregoing certification is provided solely for purposes of complying with the provisions of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from 2nd
quarter 1999 financial statements and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                          21,124
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   17,304
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                40,745
<PP&E>                                          40,148
<DEPRECIATION>                                  16,469
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  67,060
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           11,651
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            38
<OTHER-SE>                                      53,331
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    67,060
<SALES>                                         19,542
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                19,542
<CGS>                                           16,677
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   19,193
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    644
<INCOME-TAX>                                       279
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                365
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       365
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .10
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .10


</TABLE>
#### § 138.3 Payments.

Payments are due on December 31 of each year and shall be made to the official in charge of collections for the project.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

# U.S. to Contribute $100,000 to Cyclone Hudhud Humanitarian Relief Efforts

By Staff

                NEW DELHI, India  –              
Chargé d’Affaires Ambassador Kathleen Stephens extended her deepest sympathies on behalf of the American people to the people of Andhra Pradesh and Odisha who have been affected by recent Cyclone Hudhud, especially the dozens of families who have lost their loved ones.

Ambassador Stephens, in coordination with central and state authorities, announced that the United States will provide $100,000 to Plan India through the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) to assist those affected by the disaster. 

“The United States is committed to working with our partners to help those affected by the cyclone,” CDA Ambassador Stephens said.

Plan India will use these funds to provide emergency relief, including temporary shelter and non-food relief supplies, to thousands of families in remote villages severely affected by the cyclone.  

USAID, which works in both disaster preparedness and response, is working in partnership with Government of India, the private sector, and international organizations to promote disaster resilience through increased investment in disaster risk reduction activities.

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

pacom

news

articles
n 

12.1 

I J 

a 

PLEASE RESPONP TO: 

^i.TJ RAvii:;nij Hi-HjRt Oinr.^ B(.-.iDti:i 

W.vs..eir;ioii. DC 3CS15-3704 

(;C7)/25-6S16 

•ica B^^r 8T»; Aw/.'t;;:. ^5030 

EuGriK. OR 97/.01 

(641M6S-673? 

)-£CO-9<4.9c03 

125 CrMTPA", AvEtiue. 'J350 

Coos a,« , oil 97420 

lS«l)?G32Ba3 

ei7SE jACK^(irjSii«Lti, c3 

Roitoufti. 0 3 97J70 

(541)440-3523 

dcfa;iu housc.gov 

DEPARTMENT OF 

TRANSPORTATION 

••OCKET OPERATIONS 

PETER A. DErAHIO 

4 TH CI&TH:JI, OUcCOti 

TRANSPOnTATlON AND 

INFRASTRUCTURE 

ZfllG OCT - I A ifl: 9"^ !>C.3CDV.M»..:iS: 

1.-JIU UL-. I f-\ iU - i JillGHWAVSAtJRTnANSir 

CMatr.'AH 

Congresfsf of tije Uniteb ^tate£( 

Auyus- 2A, 2010 

Secretary Kay LaHood 

US Deparcmem: of Transportation 

Washington DC 

AVIATION 

RAILROADS 

HOMELAND SECURITY 

SUBCC;.t;.:ITTEES: 

TRANGPOn 1A1 ION SECURiry AND 

iNrnASTnucTi;R= PROTECTION 

MANAGEMENT, l.\'VES1IGATI0M. AtJD OVERSIGHT 

NAIURAL RESOURCES 

SUtJCOMf.lirTEE; 

NATIONAL PARKS. FORESTS. AND PUBLIC LANDS 

V;ATER AriD.=OV/ER 

Dec Secretary J.aHood: 

P.Vease note my support for the application submitued by the Eugene 

Airport for a Small Community Air Service Development Program grant to 

improve air service. 

The Sugene ALrport serves nearly 700,000 area residents, but 

current air service is .insufficient. Federal funds v;ill allow the 

airport to establish a link betv;een Eugene and San Jose, California. 

Increasing flight ^;vaiiabiiiuy will enhance use of the airport an d 

provide valuable benefits to this economically vibrant region. 

Please give this request full and fair consideration. 

Sincerely, 

PETER DeFAZIO 

Member of Congress 

PADtPvP.-J 

THIS STATIOIJERY PRINTED ON PAPER MADE WITH RECYCLED PIBERS
NO. 07-05-0163-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL D

JUNE 30, 2005

______________________________

R. WAYNE JOHNSON,

Appellant

V.

BRUCE ZELLER,

Appellee

_________________________________

FROM THE 181st DISTRICT COURT OF POTTER COUNTY;

NO. UNASSIGNED; HONORABLE JOHN B. BOARD, JUDGE

_______________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

_______________________________

Before QUINN, C.J., and REAVIS and CAMPBELL, JJ.

R. Wayne Johnson, appellant, an inmate proceeding pro se, appeals the trial court’s

order denying him permission to sue. We dismiss the appeal.
2

The clerk’s record was filed with this court on May 3, 2005. The court reporter

notified this court that there were never any on-the-record hearings and therefore, no notes

to transcribe into a reporter’s record. Appellant’s brief was therefore due on June 2, 2005.

By letter dated June 15, 2005, we notified appellant that the due date for the brief had

passed, that the brief had not been filed and no motion for extension of time to file had

been received by the court. Citing Tex. R. App. P. 38.8, the letter also notified appellant

that the appeal would be subject to dismissal unless a response reasonably explaining his

failure to file a brief, together with a showing that the appellee has not been significantly

injured by the failure, was submitted by June 27, 2005. Appellant has not filed a response

to the court’s June 15th letter, nor has he submitted a brief or a motion for extension of

time. 

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. Tex. R. App. P.

38.8(a)(1); 42.3(b).

Brian Quinn

 Chief Justice
Faulk, Scott (OST) 

From: 

Sent: 

To: 

Subject: 

Aloha, 

Ryan Mahiai <ryan_mahiai@hotmail.com> 

Wednesday, April 23, 2014 11:05 PM 

EAS (OST) 

In Support of Makani Kai for EAS 

As a resident of Kalaupapa I am STILL in continued support of Makani Kai for the EAS I Kalaupapa! Thank you 

for your consideration! 

Ryan Mahiai 

1
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 956

To designate the new hospital bed replacement building at the Ioannis A.

Lougaris Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center in Reno, Nevada, in honor of Jack Streeter.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 3, 1999

Mr. GIBBONS (for himself and Ms. BERKLEY) introduced the following bill;

which was referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs

A BILL

To designate the new hospital bed replacement building at

the Ioannis A. Lougaris Department of Veterans Affairs

Medical Center in Reno, Nevada, in honor of Jack

Streeter.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF HOSPITAL BED REPLACE4 MENT BUILDING.

5 The hospital bed replacement building under con6 struction at the Ioannis A. Lougaris Department of Veter7 ans Affairs Medical Center in Reno, Nevada, is hereby

8 designated as the ‘‘Jack Streeter Building’’. Any reference
2

•HR 956 IH

1 to that building in any law, regulation, map, document,

2 record, or other paper of the United States shall be consid3 ered to be a reference to the Jack Streeter Building.

Æ
#### Henry Taylor, Respondent, v. The Brooklyn, Queens County and Suburban Railroad Company, Appellant.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. Ho opinion. Jenks, Hooker, Gaynor and Rich, JJ., concurred; Hirschberg, P. J., not voting.
#### NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. CLEARWATER FINISHING COMPANY, Respondent.

No. 6861.

United States Court of Appeals Fourth Circuit.

Argued Oct. 19, 1954.

Decided Nov. 8, 1954.

Frederick U. Reel, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D. C. (George J. Bott, General Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate General Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. General Counsel, and Melvin Spaeth, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D. C., on brief), for petitioner.

Frank A. Constangy, Atlanta, Ga., for respondent.

Before PARKER, Chief Judge, and SOPER and DOBIE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

 This is a petition for the enforcement of an- order of the National Labor Relations Board which found that the Clearwater Finishing Company had been guilty of certain unfair labor practices and directed it to cease and desist therefrom and to restore' with back pay three employees found to have been discriminatorily discharged. Enforcement is resisted on the ground that the Board’s findings and order are not sustained by substantial evidence on the whole record. The facts are sufficiently set forth in the Board’s order and the report of the trial examiner and need not be repeated here.- We think that the findings and order are, sustained by substantial evidence on. the whole record except with respect to 'David Timmerman and in that respect we think that it is not so sustained. Timmerman was discharged as the result of an altercation with another employee. That the altercation may. have-arisen because of Tim-merman’s advocacy pf the union does not sustain the position of the Board, since the employer was within its rights in 'forbidding union advocacy during working hours. Who was to' blame in the altercation is, likewise, beside the point, as the employer had the right to discharge Timmerman because of the altercation whether he was to blame or not, so long as this was the real ground of the discharge and not a mere pretext. The evidence gives no substantial support-to the finding that the discharge, which occurred several months after the other discharges found to be discriminatory, was on account of Timmerman’s union membership, and we think that the conclusion to that effect must be condemned as speculative.

The findings and order of the Board will accordingly be modified by eliminat*609ing therefrom the findings with respect to Timmerman and the order for his reinstatement; and as so modified it will be enforced.

Modified and enforced.
#### § 8.7 Agency cooperation.

Each agency shall cooperate in keeping publication of the Code current by complying promptly with deadlines set by the Director of the Federal Register and the Public Printer.
#### § 115.805 If a tribe is paid directly under a contract for the sale or use of trust assets, will we accept those trust funds for deposit into a tribal trust account?

If a contract for the sale or use of trust assets specifies that payments are to be made directly to a tribe, we will not accept these trust funds into a tribal trust account. Where a tribe under 25 U.S.C. 450f *et seq.* has contracted or compacted with the federal government to operate a federal program and the tribe, operating the federal program on behalf of the Secretary, receives trust funds for the sale or use of trust assets pursuant to a contract that specifies that payments are to be made to the Secretary on behalf of a tribe or an individual [the owner of the trust assets], the tribe must follow § 115.708 for the deposit of the trust funds into the trust account.
#### STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff, vs. VINCENT SCHAEFER, Defendant.

DECISION

No. 2064

DATED this 13th day of May, 1977.

The application of the above-named defendant for a review of the sentence of Five years with Two years suspended imposed on February 1, 1977, was fully heard and after a careful consideration of the entire matter it is decided that:

The sentence be and remain as originally imposed except the stipulation concerning the matter of a drug program is waived provided it is documented that defendant is not considered a likely candidate for such a program.

We wish to thank Robert Wood, of the Montana Defender Project, for his assistance to the defendant and to this Court. '

SENTENCE REVIEW DIVISION

Jack L. Green, Chairman; Robert C. Sykes, Peter G. Meloy.
#### § 161.304 Must a permit be recorded?

A permit must be recorded by BIA following approval under this subpart.