alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Lester Chinn v. The State.

No. 22728.

Delivered January 19, 1944.

*556The opinion states the case.

*Paul Petty,*of Ballinger, for appellant.

*Ernest S. Goens,*State’s Attorney, of Austin, for the State.

HAWKINS, Presiding Judge.

Appellant was charged with the theft of eight pillow cases. He entered a plea of guilty before the court and was fined $25.00 and sentenced to confinement in jail for one day.

The record is before us upon one bill of exception which presents a most unusual situation.

A plea of guilty properly accepted generally carries with it an admission of the presence of criminative facts which constistute the offense charged. See Bennett v. State, 98 Tex. Cr. R. 661, 267 S. W. 987, and cases therein cited. On the other hand, the bill of exception certifies that appellant was coerced by the arresting officer to enter his plea of guilty and directly certifies: ’ “Defendant was not guilty of the offense charged and never took the property described in the complaint herein and so informed said officers at the time they told him to plead guilty, etc.” At another place in the bill occurs the following recital: “The conviction of defendant herein under the circumstances was and is wrongful and should be set aside because defendant was and is innocent of the charge on which he was convicted.”

The trial judge undertook to qualify the bill but the qualification was excepted to probably because it apparently states the facts of which the court could not have judicial knowledge but relates occurrences that took place in the office of the County Attorney and not in the presence of the court. We think the court overlooked the effect of the exception to his attempted qualification. See Dowd v. State, 104 Tex. Cr. R. 480, 284 S. W. 592; Dailey v. State, 106 Tex. Cr. R. 99, 291 S. W. 242; Barton v. State, 107 Tex. Cr. R. 75, 294 S. W. 1112.

“We have repeatedly held that such an exception destroys the qualification, and that the bills in such cases must be considered as if no such qualification had been attached.” (Winfrey v. State, 124 Tex. Cr. R. 670, 65 S. W. (2d) 297, and cases therein cited.)

An examination of the many cases referred to will point out the proper procedure when a defendant declines to accept the *557proposed qualification. We must, under the consistent holding of the court, consider the bill as though no qualification had been attempted, and so considered, we have no option but to reverse and remand the case, and it is so ordered.
From: Telander.Jeff@epamail.epa.gov [mailto:Telander.Jeff@epamail.epa.gov]

Sent: Tuesday, January 11, 2011 11:49 AM

To: Krzyzanowski, Mike

Cc: Fruh.Steve@epamail.epa.gov; Marinshaw, Richard; Raymond, Gabrielle; Holloway, Thomas C. (Tom)

Subject: Re: Glen

‐ Gery Corporation Section 114 Testing Request

Dear Mr. Krzyzanowski,

We approve of your request for submittal of the 2008 stack test results to fulfill the requirements of the

information request that was sent to you on 11/17/2010. However, we reserve the right to require

testing for metals and chlorine if we identify any QA issues with the 2008 data or if we receive

insufficient data from the rest of the industry.

Sincerely,

Jeff Telander

Jeff Telander

Sector Policies and Programs Division

Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards

(D243

‐ 02)

RTP, NC 27711

919

‐ 541

‐ 5427

919

‐ 541

‐ 5450 (FAX)

Overnight mail address:

US EPA

Mail Code D243

‐ 02

109 TW Alexander Drive

RTP, NC 27709
IV

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 202

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the artwork displayed in the Capitol and in the office buildings of the House of Representatives should represent the contributions of women to American

society.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 8, 1999

Ms. KAPTUR (for herself, Mrs. MORELLA, Mrs. MALONEY of New York, Mrs.

KELLY, Mrs. CAPPS, Mrs. JONES of Ohio, Ms. LEE, Ms. WOOLSEY, Ms.

MILLENDER-MCDONALD, Mrs. NAPOLITANO, Mr. FROST, Mr. BROWN of

Ohio, Ms. ROYBAL-ALLARD, Mrs. THURMAN, Mr. REYES, Mrs.

NORTHUP, Mr. FILNER, Mrs. MINK of Hawaii, Ms. JACKSON-LEE of

Texas, Ms. HOOLEY of Oregon, Mr. COSTELLO, Ms. SLAUGHTER, Ms.

BERKLEY, Ms. STABENOW, Ms. DELAURO, Ms. RIVERS, Mr. FATTAH,

Ms. LOFGREN, Mr. CUMMINGS, Mr. CONYERS, Ms. SCHAKOWSKY, Mr.

BROWN of California, Ms. KILPATRICK, and Mr. SANDERS) submitted the

following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on House Administration

RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that

the artwork displayed in the Capitol and in the office

buildings of the House of Representatives should represent the contributions of women to American society.

Whereas throughout the history of the United States, women

have made enduring contributions to the development

and advancement of American society;
2

•HRES 202 IH

Whereas women have won the right to vote, have borne and

reared our children, have helped to build communities,

have become nurses, doctors, teachers, lawyers, and

Members of Congress, have worked full time, have explored outer space, and have contributed widely in all

walks of life;

Whereas women have demonstrated high levels of achievement in every aspect of American society;

Whereas the artwork displayed in the Capitol and in the office buildings of the House of Representatives reflects

American society, and being represented in the artwork

is an important honor to individuals who have made significant contributions to the history of the United States;

Whereas of all the pieces of artwork displayed in the Capitol

and in the office buildings of the House of Representatives, less than 5 percent are pieces that depict the contributions of women to American society; and

Whereas the artwork displayed in the Capitol and in the office buildings of the House of Representatives severely

underrepresents the contributions of women to American

society: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That—

2 (1) it is the sense of the House of Representa3 tives that the artwork displayed in the Capitol and

4 in the office buildings of the House of Representa5 tives should also represent the contributions of

6 women to American society; and

7 (2) the House of Representatives expresses full

8 support for the efforts of the House Fine Arts
3

•HRES 202 IH

1 Board, the Joint Committee on the Library, and the

2 Architect of the Capitol to incorporate into their reg3 ular plan for the Capitol and the office buildings of

4 the House of Representatives a selection of displayed

5 artwork that is more fully representative of the con6 tributions of women to American society.

Æ
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# U.S., Japan, Republic of Korea Conduct Trilateral Aerial Exercise

By U.S. Indo-Pacific Command Public Affairs

Fighter aircraft from the U.S., Japan, and the Republic of Korea conducted a trilateral escort flight of a U.S. B-52H Stratofortress Bomber operating in the Indo-Pacific, 22 Oct, 2023. U.S. F-16s from the 80th Fighter Squadron, 8th Fighter Wing flew alongside Japan Air Self-Defense Force (JASDF) F-2s from the 8th Air Wing, and Republic of Korea Air Force (ROKAF) F-15Ks from the 11th Wing. 

This aerial exercise builds on the continued interoperability of our collective forces and demonstrates the strength of the trilateral relationship with our Japan and Republic of Korea allies. Our international cooperation is reflective of our shared values and resolve against those who challenge regional stability.

We remain committed to peace and prosperity in the region to uphold a free and open Indo-Pacific.

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT
#### § 11.453 Prostitution or solicitation.

A person who commits prostitution or solicitation or who knowingly keeps, maintains, rents, or leases, any house, room, tent, or other place for the purpose of prostitution is guilty of a misdemeanor.

[73 FR 39861, July 11, 2008]
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

# Secretary of Defense, United Kingdom and Australian Counterparts to Host Joint Press Briefing

U.S. Department of Defense

Secretary of Defense Lloyd J. Austin III is scheduled to hold a joint press briefing with the Honourable Richard Marles MP, Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Defence, Australia, and the Right Honourable Grant Shapps, Secretary of State for Defence, United Kingdom, at the Defense Innovation Unit in Mountain View, Calif., Dec. 1 at 4:00 p.m. PST (7:00 p.m. EST).

The leaders will provide significant updates on the Australia-United Kingdom-United States Security Partnership (AUKUS) following Secretary Austin's second hosting of the AUKUS Defense Ministerial Meeting.

Additionally, media interested in learning how the Department of Defense is accelerating commercial technology into the Department and seeing examples of technology and capability demonstrations in the areas of autonomy, space, energy, and human systems can attend a preview event at DIU ahead of the press briefing, Dec. 1 from 2:00-3:30 p.m. PST.

Media interested in attending these events should RSVP to media@diu.mil no later than 12:00 p.m. PST (3:00 p.m. EST), Nov. 30.

The press briefing will be livestreamed on Defense.gov and Department of Defense social media platforms.

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT
§ 51.11 How does an agency change or remove an approved incorporation? ( a ) An agency that seeks approval for a change to a publication that is approved for incorporation by reference must— ( 1 ) Publish notice of the change in the Federal Register and amend the Code of Federal Regulations;
( 2 ) Ensure that a copy of the amendment or revision is on file at the Office of the Federal Register; and
( 3 ) Notify the Director of the Federal Register in writing that the change is being made.
( b ) If a regulation containing an incorporation by reference fails to become effective or is removed from the Code of Federal Regulations, the agency must notify the Director of the Federal Register in writing of that fact within 5 working days of the occurrence.
```

[115th Congress Public Law 82]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

[[Page 131 STAT. 1266]]

Public Law 115-82
115th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To reauthorize <<NOTE: Nov. 2, 2017 -  [S. 782]>>  the National Internet 
   Crimes Against Children Task Force Program, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, <<NOTE: Providing 
Resources, Officers, and Technology to Eradicate Cyber Threats to Our 
Children Act of 2017.>> 
SECTION 1. <<NOTE: 34 USC 10101 note.>>  SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Providing Resources, Officers, and 
Technology To Eradicate Cyber Threats to Our Children Act of 2017'' or 
the ``PROTECT Our Children Act of 2017''.
SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION OF THE NATIONAL INTERNET CRIMES AGAINST 
                    CHILDREN TASK FORCE PROGRAM.

    Title I of the PROTECT Our Children Act of 2008 (34 U.S.C. 21101 et 
seq.) is amended in section 107(a)(10) (34 U.S.C. 21117(a)(10)), by 
striking ``fiscal year 2018'' and inserting ``each of fiscal years 2018 
through 2022''.

    Approved November 2, 2017.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--S. 782:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 163 (2017):
            June 15, considered and passed Senate.
            Oct. 3, considered and passed House, amended.
            Oct. 26, Senate concurred in House amendment.

                                  <all>
```
#### § 101.21 Repayments on United States direct loans.

Repayments on United States direct loans shall be made to the authorized collection officer of the Bureau of Indian Affairs who shall issue an official receipt for the repayment and deposit the collection into the revolving loan fund. Collections will first be applied to pay interest to date of payment and the balance applied on the principal installment due. Collections on loans made by relending organizations which have been declared in default in which the Commissioner has taken control of the assets of the program (including loans made with balances owing) will be made to an authorized collection officer of the Bureau of Indian Affairs who shall issue a receipt to the payor and deposit the collection in the United States revolving loan fund. The relending organization's loan from the United States will be credited with the amounts collected from its borrowers, with the collections applied first on interest accrued and the balance applied to the principal. Payments on United States direct loans may be made in advance of due dates without penalty.

[40 FR 3587, Jan. 23, 1975. Redesignated at 47 FR 13327, Mar. 30, 1982. Further redesignated at 57 FR 46472, Oct. 8, 1992]
#### Luther L. Dunn v. The State.

No. 22874.

Delivered May 31, 1944.

The opinion states the case.

*W. C. McDonald*and *D. I. Durham,*both of San Angelo, for appellant.

*Ernest S. Goens,*State’s Attorney, of Austin, for the State.

HAWKINS, Presiding Judge.

Conviction is for transporting whisky in a dry area, punishment a fine of one hundred dollars.

No statement, of facts is brought forward. Objections to the court’s charge and refusal of special charges cannot be appraised- in the absence of the facts.

The judgment is affirmed.
#### In the Matter of Jared P. Gorman, Petitioner, v New York State Department of Motor Vehicles et al., Respondents.

[824 NYS2d 526]

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Fourth Judicial Department by order of the Supreme Court, Erie County [Joseph R. Glownia, J.], entered May 5, 2006) to annul a determination of respondent New York State Department of Motor Vehicles. The determination found that petitioner violated Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1129 (a) and revoked his driver’s license.

It is hereby ordered that the determination be and the same hereby is unanimously confirmed without costs and the petition is dismissed.

Memorandum: In this CPLR article 78 proceeding, transferred to this Court pursuant to CPLR 7804 (g), petitioner seeks to annul the determination that he violated Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1129 (a), for following another vehicle too closely, and revoking his driver’s license for 30 days. The determination arises out of a multivehicle accident in which the vehicle driven by petitioner rear-ended a vehicle that was either stopped or in the process of stopping, pushing the vehicle into the opposing lane of traffic. That vehicle was then struck by a third vehicle, and a passenger in the third vehicle was killed. Petitioner did not preserve for our review his contention concerning administrative delay inasmuch as he did not raise an objection on that ground before the Administrative Law Judge *(see Matter of King v New York State Dept. of Health,*295 AD2d 743, 745 [2002]; *Matter of Choe v Axelrod,*141 AD2d 235, 239 [1988]; *cf. Matter of Lawrence v DeBuono,*251 AD2d 700, 701 [1998]), and he failed to exhaust his administrative remedies with respect to that contention inasmuch as he did not contend on his administrative appeal that there was undue delay in conducting the hearing *(see Matter of Shapard v Zon,*30 AD3d 1098 [2006]; *Matter of Nelson v Coughlin,*188 AD2d 1071 [1992], *appeal dismissed*81 NY2d 834 [1993]).

Contrary to petitioner’s further contention, the determination is supported by substantial evidence *(see Matter of Cotugno v Commissioner of Motor Vehs.,*304 AD2d 1030, 1031 [2003]; *Matter of Boggia v Murphy, 212*AD2d 931 [1995]; *see generally 300 Gramatan Ave.*Assoc. v *State Div. of Human Rights,*45 NY2d 176, 181-182 [1978]). Finally, we conclude that the penalty is not “so disproportionate to the offense as to be shocking to one’s sense of fairness” *(Matter of Pell v Board of Educ. of Union*
      *1362
      *Free School Dist. No. 1 of Towns of Scarsdale & Mamaroneck, Westchester County,*34 NY2d 222, 237 [1974]; *see Matter of Kelly v Safir,*96 NY2d 32, 38 [2001], *rearg denied*96 NY2d 854 [2001]; *see also Matter of Martin v Adduci,*138 AD2d 599 [1988]; *Matter of La Bue v Melton,*87 AD2d 975 [1982]). Present—Scudder, J.E, Kehoe, Gorski, Smith and Pine, JJ.
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Hometown Auto Retailers, Inc. (the
      "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2006 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Corey
      E. Shaker, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.








/s/
                  Corey E. ShakerCorey
                  E. ShakerPresident
                  and Chief Executive Officer
                August
                  10, 2006
EXHIBIT 32.2

Statement of Chief Financial Officer under 18 U.S.C. § 1350

I, James A. Clark, the chief financial officer of Critical Path, Inc. (the
Company), certify for the purposes of section 1350 of chapter 63 of title 18 of the United States Code that, to the best of my knowledge,



| | (i) | the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2007 (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | ---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                  
|------------------
|                  
|/s/ James A. Clark
|James A. Clark    

November 14, 2007

A signed original of this written statement required by 18 U.S.C. § 1350 has been provided to Critical Path, Inc. and will be retained by Critical Path, Inc. and furnished to the United States Securities Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
**Exhibit 35.3**

OFFICER’S CERTIFICATE 

I, Karen Montbach, aManaging Director of Citibank, N.A. (the “Company”), hereby certify, with respect to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement (the “Agreement”), dated as of December 1, 2011, between CCRE Commercial Mortgage Securities, L.P., asDepositor, KeyBank National Association, as successor Master Servicer, LNR Partners, LLC, as Special Servicer, TriMont Real Estate Advisors, Inc., as Operating Advisor, Citibank, N.A., as Certificate Administrator and U.S. Bank National Associationas successor Trustee to Citibank, N.A., the following: 

1.     A review of the Company’s activities as CertificateAdministrator and Custodian during the reporting period beginning January 1, 2018 and ending December 31, 2018 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance under the Agreement has been made under my supervision. 

2.    To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Company has fulfilled all of its obligations under theAgreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period. 

This statement is given by the undersigned as an authorized officer of the Companyand not in the undersigned’s individual capacity. 

Date: February 20, 2019 

 
Citibank, N.A.By: /s/ Karen MontbachName: Karen MontbachTitle: Managing Director