alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FINANCIAL
INFORMATION FOR MMH HOLDINGS, INC. AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             NOV-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-1999
<CASH>                                           3,360
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   73,790
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (1,622)
<INVENTORY>                                     42,822
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               133,252
<PP&E>                                          68,525
<DEPRECIATION>                                (27,703)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 311,616
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          140,278
<BONDS>                                        204,114
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           98,446
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   (134,232)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   311,616
<SALES>                                         67,920
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                68,022
<CGS>                                           50,614
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   15,933
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (6,908)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (5,433)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (2,453)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,974)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,974)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________ No. 95-50552 Summary Calendar

__________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus RALPH J. HINOJOSA, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. A-90-CA-112-JN

- - - - - - - - - - January 12, 1996 Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, DAVIS and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Ralph J. Hinojosa appeals from the district court's denial of his motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Hinojosa argues that the district court erred by assessing a four-level increase for his role in the offense pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 3B1.1(a), that the district court erred by assessing criminal history points for an unclassified misdemeanor, that he was entitled to an additional one-level reduction for acceptance of responsibility pursuant to § 3E1.1, and that the district court erred in determining the amount of his fine under § 5E1.2. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Hinojosa v. United States , No. A-95-CA-112 JN, A-90-CR-124 JN (W.D. Tex. June 28, 1995). Hinojosa's assertion that his motions for discovery and inspectionNo. 95-50552 -2- and for itemized cost of each discovery item were improperly denied was not adequately briefed and is thus deemed abandoned on appeal. See Yohey v. Collins , 985 F.2d 222, 225 (5th Cir. 1993). The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. AFFIRMED.
§ 457.170 Compliance procedures. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, this section applies to all allegations of discrimination on the basis of handicap in programs or activities conducted by the agency.
( b ) The agency shall process complaints alleging violations of section 504 with respect to employment according to the procedures established by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission in 29 CFR part 1613 pursuant to section 501 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 U.S.C. 791).
( c ) The Executive Director shall be responsible for coordinating implementation of this section. Complaints may be sent to Equal Employment Opportunity Director, National Capital Planning Commission, 1325 G Street NW., Washington, DC 20576.
( d ) The agency shall accept and investigate all complete complaints for which it has jurisdiction. All complete complaints must be filed within 180 days of the alleged act of discrimination. The agency may extend this time period for good cause.
( e ) If the agency receives a complaint over which it does not have jurisdiction, it shall promptly notify the complainant and shall make reasonable efforts to refer the complaint to the appropriate government entity.
( f ) The agency shall notify the Architectural and Transportation Barriers Compliance Board upon receipt of any complaint alleging that a building or facility that is subject to the Architectural Barriers Act of 1968, as amended (42 U.S.C. 4151-4157), or section 502 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended (29 U.S.C. 792), is not readily accessible to and usable by handicapped persons.
( g ) Within 180 days of the receipt of a complete complaint for which it has jurisdiction, the agency shall notify the complainant of the results of the investigation in a letter containing— ( 1 ) Findings of fact and conclusions of law;
( 2 ) A description of a remedy for each violation found; and
( 3 ) A notice of the right to appeal.
( h ) Appeals of the findings of fact and conclusions of law or remedies must be filed by the complainant within 90 days of receipt from the agency of the letter required by § 457.170(g). The agency may extend this time for good cause.
( i ) Timely appeals shall be accepted and processed by the head of the agency.
( j ) The head of the agency shall notify the complainant of the results of the appeal within 60 days of the receipt of the request. If the head of the agency determines that additional information is needed from the complainant, he or she shall have 60 days from the date of receipt of the additional information to make his or her determination on the appeal.
( k ) The time limits cited in paragraphs (g) and (j) of this section may be extended with the permission of the Assistant Attorney General.
( l ) The agency may delegate its authority for conducting complaint investigations to other Federal agencies, except that the authority for making the final determination may not be delegated to another agency.
[51 FR 22887, 22896, June 23, 1986, as amended at 5l FR 22888, June 23, 1986]
§ 115.420 When developing a minor's distribution plan, what information must be considered and included in the evaluation? When developing a minor's distribution plan, the following information must be considered and included in the evaluation: ( a ) Documentation which establishes who has physical custody of the minor (e.g., home visits, school records, medical records, etc.);
( b ) A copy of any custodial orders or guardianship orders from a court of competent jurisdiction;
( c ) The name(s) of the person and his or her relationship to the minor, if any, who make a request for a disbursement from the minor's account;
( d ) An evaluation of other resources, including parental income, that may be available to meet the unmet needs of the minor;
( e ) A list of the amounts, purposes, and dates for which disbursements will be made;
( f ) The name(s) of the person to whom disbursements may be made, including, as applicable: ( 1 ) A custodial parent;
( 2 ) A legal guardian;
( 3 ) The person who has been recognized by the BIA as having control and custody of the minor;
( 4 ) An emancipated minor; and/or
( 5 ) Any third parties to whom the BIA will make direct payment for goods or services provided to the minor and supported by an invoice or bill of sale;
( g ) The date(s) (at least every six months) when the custodial parent, the legal guardian, the person who has been recognized by the BIA as having control and custody of the minor, or the emancipated minor must provide receipts to the BIA to show that expenditures were made in accordance with the approved distribution plan;
( h ) Additional requirements and justification for those requirements, as necessary to ensure that any distribution(s) will benefit the minor;
( i ) The dates the disbursement plan was developed, approved, and reviewed, and the date for the next scheduled review;
( j ) The date(s) the distribution plan was amended and an explanation for any amendment(s) to the distribution plan, when an amendment is necessary;
( k ) The signature of the BIA official approving the plan with the certification that the plan is in the best interest of the account holder; and
( l ) The signature(s) of the custodial parent, legal guardian, with date(s) signed, certifying that he or she has been consulted and has agreed to the terms of the evaluation and the distribution plan.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JUAN CARLOS GARCIA-AYALA,

 Petitioner,

 v.

LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 13-71239

Agency No. A200-626-395

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted March 15, 2016** 

Before: GOODWIN, LEAVY, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges.

Juan Carlos Garcia-Ayala, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for

review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal

from an immigration judge’s decision denying his application for cancellation of

removal. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial

FILED

MAR 22 2016

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
evidence factual determinations, and we review de novo questions of law. 

Najmabadi v. Holder, 597 F.3d 983, 986 (9th Cir. 2010). We deny the petition for

review.

Garcia-Ayala is statutorily barred from establishing good moral character in

order to qualify for cancellation of removal, where substantial evidence supports

the BIA’s determination that he engaged in an affirmative act in support of alien

smuggling. See 8 U.S.C. §§ 1101(f)(3), 1182(a)(6)(E)(I), 1229b(b)(1)(B); Urzua

Covarrubias v. Gonzales, 487 F.3d 742, 747-49 (9th Cir. 2007) (alien smuggling

finding supported by substantial evidence where the petitioner’s collecting of

money and payment to a smuggler upon delivery of his brother provided “an

affirmative act of help, assistance, or encouragement” (citation and quotation

marks omitted)).

Garcia-Ayala’s contention that the BIA failed to provide adequate reasoning

in making the smuggling determination is without merit. See Najmabadi, 597 F.3d

at 990 (“What is required is merely that [the agency] consider the issues raised, and

announce its decision in terms sufficient to enable a reviewing court to perceive

that it has heard and thought and not merely reacted.” (citation and quotation marks

omitted)).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

2 13-71239
EX-31 Rule13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certifications.

 

 

I, Leah Nivison,certify that:

 

1. I have reviewedthis report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed inrespect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of the GS MortgageSecurities Trust 2012-GC6 (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");

 

2. Based on myknowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not containany untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3. Based on myknowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required tobe provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is includedin the Exchange Act periodic reports;

 

4. Based on myknowledge and the servicer compliance statements required in this report underItem 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Actperiodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under theservicing agreements in all material respects; and

 

5. All of the reportson assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securitiesand their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance withservicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in thisreport in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except asotherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliancedescribed in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

 

In giving thecertifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me bythe following unaffiliated parties:

 

KeyBank NationalAssociation, as Master Servicer, Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, as SpecialServicer, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Trustee, Wells Fargo Bank,National Association, as Custodian, and TriMont Real Estate Advisors, Inc., asOperating Advisor.

 

 

 

Dated: March 25, 2020

 

 

/s/ Leah Nivison

 

 

Chief ExecutiveOfficer

(senior officerin charge of securitization of the depositor)
#### § 135.20 Private contract lands; assessments.

In addition to 4,751.5 acres of non-Indian land included within the two irrigation Districts dealt with in subpart A, there are 3,237.6 acres of land, more or less, in non-Indian ownership under private ditches, covered by repayment contracts executed pursuant to the act of June 28, 1946 (60 Stat. 333-338), obligating such owners to pay their proper share of such construction costs. The total per acre charge against all such lands is $26.38. This amounts to an annual per acre rate of $0.6595. For the purposes of this notice the annual per acre rate is hereby fixed at $0.66. This annual rate of assessment will continue for a 40-year period within which the total amount of construction cost of $210,726 is to be repaid without interest. The amount of each annual installment chargeable against the lands covered by each of the several contracts with individual landowners whose lands are served under private ditches, shall be determined by multiplying the total acreage, under each contract entitled to Willow Creek storage rights, either directly or by substitution, by the per acre annual rate. Against the amounts due annually by the individual landowners whose lands are served by private ditches, under this notice there shall be allowed any credits due under section 6 of the act of June 28, 1946. Credits due on behalf of any land shall be reflected in any statement submitted to the landowners.
§ 141.32 Reservation pawnbroker license required. ( a ) No person may accept pawns or pledges of personal property as security for monies or accounts due by an Indian within the exterior boundaries of the Navajo, Hopi or Zuni Reservations unless such person is an agent of a bank, saving bank, trust company, savings or building and loan association, or credit union operating under the laws of the United States or the laws of New Mexico, Arizona, or Utah or unless such person— ( 1 ) Holds a valid license to operate a reservation business,
( 2 ) Holds a valid reservation pawnbroker license, and
( 3 ) Posts a bond on a form provided by the commissioner in the name of the licensee in the amount of twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000) or such larger sum as may be designated by the Commissioner with two (2) or more sureties approved by the Commissioner or with a guaranty company qualified under the Act of August 13, 1894 (28 Stat. 279; 6 U.S.C. 6-13).
( b ) An applicant for a reservation pawnbroker license shall apply in writing on a form provided by the Commissioner.
( c ) The bond required by paragraph (a) of this section shall be in favor of the United States for the benefits of the customers of the licensee and shall specifically indemnify all customers who have recovered judgment against the licensee for destroyed, lost, misplaced or misappropriated pawn or other property. Any customer recovering such a judgment may bring suit on the bond in his or her own name. The bond shall be for the same period as the license.
( d ) Any surety on a bond under this section may be relieved of liability by complying with the provisions of § 141.57.
( e ) No person may accept pawns or pledges of personal property as security for monies or accounts due by an Indian after the effective date of a tribal ordinance banning the acceptance of pawn on the reservation.
[40 FR 39837, Aug. 29, 1975, as amended at 41 FR 3288, Jan. 22, 1976; 41 FR 22937, June 8, 1976. Redesignated at 47 FR 13327, Mar. 30, 1982]
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

JANNINE ZITNEY AND STEVE ZITNEY,

Petitioners

v.

WYETH LLC., WYETH 

PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., MORTON 

GROVE PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., TEVA 

PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC., A.K.A 

IVAX PHARMACEUTICALS, PLIVA, INC., 

BARR PHARMACEUTICALS, LLC., A.K.A 

BARR PHARMACEUTICALS, INC FK., 

BARR LABORATORIES, INC., DURAMED 

PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., QUALITEST 

PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., VINTAGE 

PHARMACEUTICALS, LLC., GENERICS 

BIDO I., LLC, INDIVIDUAL, A.K.A 

QUALIITEST PHARMACEUTICALS., 

HARVARD DRUG GROUP, LLC, A.K.A 

MAJOR PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., 

PHARMACEUTICAL ASSOCIATES, INC., 

BEACH PRODUCTS, INC., UNITED 

RESEACH LABORATORIES, INC., 

MUTUAL PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANY, 

INC., SILARX PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., 

SANDOZ, INC., ANIP ACQUISITION 

COMPANY, A.K.A A&I 

PHARMACEUTICALS, A.K.A ANI 

PHARMACEUTICALS, A.K.A ANIP 

PHARMACEUTICALS, WATSON 

LABORATORIES, INC., ACTAVIS 

ELIZABETH LLC, INDIVIDUAL, A.K.A 

PUREPAC PHARMACEUTICALS DBA., 

APP PHARMACEUTICALS LLC., A.K.A 

ABRAXIS PHARMACEUTICALS DBA., 

AMNEAL PHARMACEUTICALS, LLC., 

BEDFORD LABORATORIES, HOSPIRA 

INC., MCKESSON CORPORATION, 

INDIVIDUALLY, A.K.A NORTHSTAR RX, 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 446 EAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court
[446 EAL 2020] - 2

LLC DBA., NORTHSTAR RX LLC, RUGBY 

LABORATORIES, INC., NORBROOK INC. 

USA SMITH & NEPHEW, INC., 

VISTAPHARM, INC., ROXANE 

LABORATORIES, INC., INDIV THE 

CORPORATION TRUST COMPANY, USL 

PHARMA, INC., PAR PHARMACEUTICAL 

INC., HALSEY DRUG, LLC INDIVIDUALLY, 

A.K.A HALSEY DRUG CO INC, DBA., 

SUPERPHARM, INC., PACO 

PHARMACEUTICAL SERVICES, INC., 

SCHERING CORPORATION, IVAX 

PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., GOLDLINE 

LABORATORIES INC., INDIVI, A.K.A IVAX 

PHARMACEUTICALS DBA., BRISTOL 

MYERS SQUIBB CO., A.K.A APOTHECON 

INC DBA., APOTHECON, INC., PFIZER, 

INC., INVAMED, INC., KING 

PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., A.K.A A.L. 

PHARMA INC FKA., A.K.A ALPHARMA INC 

DBA., A.K.A ALPHARMA-BARRE 

NATIONAL., RICHMOND 

PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., KAREN 

TOBIN, M.D., SCHWARZ PHARMA, INC., 

ALAVEN PHARMACEUTICAL LLC.,

BAXTER HEALTHCARE CORPORATION., 

AND WOCKHARDT USA.,

Respondents

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 27th day of April, 2021, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 924

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow vendor refunds of

Federal excise taxes on undyed kerosene used in unvented heaters for

home heating purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 2, 1999

Mr. MALONEY of Connecticut (for himself and Mr. SPRATT) introduced the

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow vendor

refunds of Federal excise taxes on undyed kerosene used

in unvented heaters for home heating purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. VENDOR REFUNDS OF FEDERAL EXCISE TAXES

4 ON UNDYED KEROSENE USED IN UNVENTED

5 HEATERS FOR HOME HEATING PURPOSES.

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subparagraph (B) of section

7 6427(l)(5) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating

8 to sales of kerosene not for use in motor fuel) is amended

9 by striking ‘‘or’’ at the end of clause (i), by striking the
2

•HR 924 IH

1 period at the end of clause (ii) and inserting ‘‘, or’’, and

2 by adding at the end the following new clause:

3 ‘‘(iii) in a qualified residential sale (as

4 defined in subparagraph (D)).’’

5 (b) QUALIFIED RESIDENTIAL SALE.—Paragraph (5)

6 of section 6427(l) of such Code is amended by adding at

7 the end the following new subparagraph:

8 ‘‘(D) QUALIFIED RESIDENTIAL SALE.—

9 For purposes of subparagraph (B)(iii), the term

10 ‘qualified residential sale’ means any sale of

11 kerosene if—

12 ‘‘(i) the kerosene is delivered into a

13 storage tank (of at least 50 but not more

14 than 200 gallons) located at a residence

15 for use as a fuel in an unvented heater

16 used for heating the residence, and

17 ‘‘(ii) the vendor reasonably believes

18 that the kerosene is being so used.

19 Such term shall not include any sale which is

20 more than 30 days after the date of the submis21 sion to Congress of a study conducted by the

22 Secretary which finds that kerosene which is

23 dyed pursuant to section 4082 may be burned

24 in unvented residential heaters without endan25 gering the health or safety of the residents.’’
3

•HR 924 IH

1 (c) REFUNDS.—Subparagraph (A) of section

2 6427(f)(4) of such Code is amended by adding at the end

3 the following new sentence: ‘‘In a case to which subsection

4 (l)(5)(B)(iii) applies, clause (ii) shall be applied by sub5 stituting ‘1 month’ for ‘1 week’ and paragraph (3)(B)

6 shall be applied by substituting ‘45 days’ for ‘20 days’.’’

7 (d) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

8 this section shall apply to sales after the date of the enact9 ment of this Act.

10 SEC. 2. STUDY OF SAFETY OF USING DYED KEROSENE IN

11 UNVENTED RESIDENTIAL HEATERS.

12 The Secretary of the Treasury or such Secretary’s

13 delegate shall conduct a study of whether kerosene which

14 has been dyed for Federal tax purposes may be used as

15 a fuel in unvented residential heaters without endangering

16 the health or safety of the residents. The results of such

17 study shall be submitted to each House of Congress not

18 later than January 1, 2000.

Æ
#### § 1000.241 Does this subpart create an agency relationship?

No, a BIA or non-BIA construction program does not automatically create an agency relationship. However, Federal law, provisions of an AFA, or Federal actions may create an agency relationship.
In the Senate of the United States,

March 25, 1999.

Resolved, That the bill from the House of Representatives (H.R. 98) entitled ‘‘An Act to amend chapter 443 of

title 49, United States Code, to extend the aviation war risk

insurance program and to amend the Centennial of Flight

Commemoration Act to make technical and other corrections.’’, do pass with the following

AMENDMENTS:

1 Page 2, strike out all after line 4 over to and includ2 ing line 9 on page 4

Amend the title so as to read: ‘‘An Act to amend

chapter 443 of title 49, United States Code, to extend

the aviation war risk insurance program.’’.

Attest:

Secretary.
106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 98

AMENDMENTS