alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>5
<LEGEND>
This  schedule  contains  summary  financial   information  extracted  from  the
Registrant's  unaudited interim  financial  statements for the nine month period
ended March 31, 2000 and is  qualified  in its  entirety by  reference  to those
financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>0001060755
<NAME> RIDGEWOOD ELECTRIC POWER TRUST V

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                      11,994,060
<SECURITIES>                                45,909,272<F1>
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            12,942,256<F2>
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              58,862,479
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          352,139<F3>
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                  57,290,594<F4>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                58,862,479
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                29,470
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,302,322
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (2,154,829)<F5>
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (2,154,829)<F5>
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (2,154,829)<F5>
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (2,310)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (2,310)

<FN>
<F1>Investment  in power  project  partnership  and  limited  liability  company
accounted for on equity basis.
<F2>Includes $576,934 due from affiliates.
<F3>Includes $279,009 due to affiliates.
<F4>Shareholders' equity of $57,509,654 less managing share-
holders' accumulated deficit of $219,060.
<F5>After addition of minority interest in Ridgewood WaterPure Corporation
loss of $118,023.
</FN>


</TABLE>
#### § 1000.254 May a Tribe/Consortium reallocate funds from a construction program to a non-construction program?

No, a Tribe/Consortium may not reallocate funds from a construction program to a non-construction program unless otherwise provided under the relevant appropriation acts.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsAnalysis of heat-transfer tests of an impingement-convection- and film-cooled vane in a cascadeExperimental flow and heat transfer data obtained for an air-cooled turbine vane tested in a static cascade at gas temperatures and pressures to 1644 K (2500 F) and 31 N/cm2 (45 psia), respectively, are presented. Average and local vane temperatures were correlated in several ways. Calculated and measured coolant flows and vane temperatures are compared. Potential allowable increases in gas temperature are also discussed.Document ID19720005298Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsGladden, H. J.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)*Gauntner, D. J.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)*Livingood, J. N. B.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 2, 2013Publication DateDecember 1, 1971Subject CategoryThermodynamics And CombustionReport/Patent NumberNASA-TM-X-2376E-6230Accession Number72N12947Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 764-74Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19720005298.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
§ 11.416 Forgery. ( a ) A person is guilty of forgery, a misdemeanor, if, with purpose to defraud or injure anyone, or with knowledge that he or she is facilitating fraud or injury to be perpetrated by anyone, he or she: ( 1 ) Alters, makes, completes, authenticates, issues or transfers any writing of another without his or her authority; or
( 2 ) Utters any writing which he or she knows to be forged in a manner above specified.
( b ) “Writing” includes printing or any other method of recording information, money, coins, tokens, stamps, seals, credit cards, badges, trademarks, and other symbols of value, right, privilege, or identification.
#### Delia Wilson, Respondent, v. Alice Wilson, Appellant.

Judgment of the Municipal Court affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Jenks, Hooker, Gaynor, Rich and Miller, JJ., concurred.
Exhibit 34.2




Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (KPMG LLP)









Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm






The Board of Directors


Citibank, N.A.:




We have examined management’s assertion, included in the accompanying Management’s Assertion of Compliance, that the Agency and Trust division of Citibank, N.A. (the “Company”) complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB for publicly-issued (i.e., transaction-level reporting initially required under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) automobile loan or lease-backed securities serviced by Nissan Motor Acceptance Corporation issued on or after January 1, 2006 for which the Company provides trustee and paying agent services (the “Platform”), except for servicing criteria 1122(d)(1)(i)-1122(d)(1)(iv), 1122(d)(2)(i), 1122(d)(2)(iii), 1122(d)(2)(v)-1122(d)(2)(vii), 1122(d)(3)(i) and 1122(d)(4)(i)-1122(d)(4)(xv), which the Company has determined are not applicable to the activities it performs with respect to the Platform, as of and for the twelve months ended March 31, 2013.  With respect to the Platform, servicing criterion 1122(d)(3)(ii) is applicable only as it relates to remittances.  Management is responsible for the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management’s assertion about the Company’s compliance based on our examination.







Our examination was conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States)and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria specified above and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances.  Our examination included testing selected asset-backed transactions and securities that comprise the Platform, testing selected servicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whether the Company processed those selected transactions and performed those selected activities in compliance with the servicing criteria.  Furthermore, our procedures were limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report.  Our procedures were not designed to determine whether errors may have occurred either prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report for the selected transactions or any other transactions. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.  Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria.







In our opinion, management’s assertion that the Company complied with the aforementioned servicing criteria as of and for the twelve months ended March 31, 2012 is fairly stated, in all material respects.







/s/ KPMG LLP






Chicago, Illinois


May 24, 2013
#### § 1.1 [Reserved]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             NOV-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-1999
<CASH>                                           8,729
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   73,499
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (884)
<INVENTORY>                                    127,532
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                32,232
<PP&E>                                         338,343
<DEPRECIATION>                                (78,666)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 643,649
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          101,055
<BONDS>                                        300,049
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                       4,449
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   643,649
<SALES>                                        181,718
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               181,718
<CGS>                                          160,207
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  178,017
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (513)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     8
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              14,825
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (6,961)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     7,168
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (14,129)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (14,129)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
**Exhibit
      32.1**





Certification
      Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.
§1350)





I,
      Thomas
      W. Martin, Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President of ICON Capital
      Corp., the General Partner of the Registrant in connection with the Quarterly
      Report of ICON Income Fund Eight A L.P. (the "Partnership") on Form 10-Q/A
      for
      the period ended March 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
      Commission on the date hereof (the "Quarterly Report") certify, pursuant to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my
      knowledge:





1.
            The
                Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                13(a) or
                15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. §78m);
                and





2.
            The
                information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in
                all
                material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
                of
                the Partnership.








*Dated:
      December 11, 2007*





*/s/
      Thomas W. Martin*


Thomas
      W.
      Martin


Chairman,
      Chief Executive Officer and President of the General Partner


(Principal
      Executive Officer)


ICON
      Capital Corp.


General
      Partner of ICON Income Fund Eight A L.P.
EXHIBIT 32.2

Statement of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Knight Capital Group, Inc. (the Company) for the
quarter ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Steven Bisgay, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or, 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

/S/    STEVEN BISGAYName: Steven BisgayTitle:    Chief Financial OfficerDate:   May 11, 2009


This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

# Joint Task Force Red Hill Officially Stands Up Operations     

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT
(November 30, 2006)

#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Ramon Lopez, Appellant.

[824 NYS2d 640]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Bruce Allen, J.), rendered October 29, 2004, convicting defendant, after a nonjury trial, of robbery in the second degree (two counts) and *373possession of burglar’s tools (three counts), and sentencing him, as a second violent felony offender, to an aggregate term of seven years, unanimously affirmed.

The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence. The evidence supports the conclusion that defendant used force to retain property after stealing it, and thus committed robbery. With stolen merchandise concealed on his person, defendant sprayed pepper spray at store security guards who approached him, and exhorted his accomplice, who was also in possession of stolen property, to flee the scene. Defendant’s continued retention of the merchandise during the struggle further supports an inference that this use of force was for the purpose of overcoming resistance to his retention of the property *(see e.g. People v McMahon,*279 AD2d 272 [2001], *lv denied*96 NY2d 803 [2001]; *People v Thomas,*226 AD2d 120 [1996], *lv denied*88 NY2d 886 [1996]). Although defendant addresses only the sufficiency and not the weight of the evidence, his principal argument is that the trier of fact should have credited his testimony that he used the spray only to protect his accomplice from being injured by the security guards. However, there is no basis for disturbing the court’s credibility determinations. Concur—Buckley, P.J., Tom, Mazzarelli, Williams and McGuire, JJ.
#### Irene Warden, an Infant, by William E. Warden, Her Guardian ad Litem, Appellant, v. The City of New York and Others, Respondents.

Motiozi denied. Presezzt — Jenks, Hooker, Gaynor, Rich and Miller, JJ.
Exhibit 35.1




Servicer Compliance Statement of Nissan Motor Acceptance Corporation









NISSAN MOTOR ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION




OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE




The undersigned, Mark Kaczynski, President and Chief Executive Officer of NISSAN MOTOR ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION, a California corporation (the “Company”), does hereby certify, in his capacity as such corporate officer, as follows:




(1)           The undersigned has caused a review of the activities of the Company, in its capacity as Servicer, during the 12-month period ended March 31, 2015 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance pursuant to the Sale and Servicing Agreement, dated as of November 17, 2011 (the “Agreement”), by and among the Company, individually and as servicer, Nissan Auto Receivables Corporation II, as seller, and Nissan Auto Receivables 2011-B Owner Trust, to be conducted under his supervision; and




(2)           To the best of the undersigned’s knowledge, based upon such review, the Company has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.




This Officer’s Certificate is being furnished pursuant to Item 1123 of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB for publicly-issued asset-backed securities.  Capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the meanings assigned to such terms in the Agreement.




IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have set my hand effective as of the 26th day of June, 2015.




/s/ Mark Kaczynski_________________


Mark Kaczynski


President and Chief Executive Officer
§ 103.32 What sort of loan documentation does BIA expect the lender to maintain? For every loan guaranteed or insured under the Program, the lender must maintain: ( a ) BIA's original loan guaranty certificate or insurance coverage approval letter, if applicable;
( b ) Original signed and/or certified counterparts of all final loan documents, including those listed in § 103.17 (concerning documents required for loan closing), all renewals, modifications, and additions to those documents, and signed settlement statements;
( c ) Originals or copies, as appropriate, of all documents gathered by the lender under §§ 103.12, 103.13 and 103.26 (concerning information submitted by the borrower in its loan application, and information supplied to BIA in the lender's loan guaranty or insurance coverage application);
( d ) Originals or copies, as appropriate, of all applicable insurance binders or certificates, including without limitation hazard, liability, key man life, and title insurance;
( e ) A complete and current history of all loan transactions, including dated disbursements, payments, adjustments, and notes describing all contacts with the borrower;
( f ) Originals or copies, as appropriate, of all correspondence with the borrower, including default notices and evidence of receipt;
( g ) Originals or copies, as appropriate, of all correspondence, notices, news items or other information concerning the borrower, whether gathered by the lender or furnished to it, containing material information about the borrower and its business operations;
( h ) Originals or copies, as appropriate, of all advertisements, notices, title instruments, accountings, and other documentation of efforts to liquidate loan collateral; and
( i ) Originals or copies, as appropriate, of all notices, pleadings, motions, orders, and other documents associated with any legal proceeding involving the lender and the borrower or its assets, including without limitation judicial or non-judicial foreclosure proceedings, suits to collect payment, bankruptcy proceedings, probate proceedings, and any settlement associated with threatened or actual litigation.
§ 1187.22 How will OIED conduct the site evaluation? ( a ) Before awarding a grant to an eligible applicant, OIED will conduct an evaluation of the proposed site to verify that the applicant has (or will have) the physical workspace, equipment, and connectivity necessary for Native businesses and Native entrepreneurs to collaborate and conduct business on a local, regional, national, and/or international level.
( b ) To determine whether the site meets the requirements of paragraph (a) of this section: ( 1 ) If the applicant is in possession of the proposed site, OIED will conduct an on-site visit or review a video submission before awarding the grant.
( 2 ) If the applicant is not yet in possession of the proposed site and has submitted a written site proposal, OIED will review the written site proposal before awarding the grant and will conduct an on-site visit or review a video submission to ensure the site is consistent with the written site proposal no later than one year after awarding the grant. If OIED determines the site is not consistent with the written site proposal, OIED will use that information in determining the ongoing eligibility of the applicant under § 1187.50.
§ 161.202 How are range units established? ( a ) BIA, with the concurrence of the Navajo Nation, will establish range units on the Navajo Partitioned Lands to provide unified areas for which range management plans can be developed to improve and maintain soil and forage resources. Physical land features, watersheds, drainage patterns, vegetation, soil, resident concentration, problem areas, historical land use patterns, chapter boundaries, special land uses and comprehensive land use planning will be considered in the determination of range unit boundaries.
( b ) BIA may modify range unit boundaries with the concurrence of the Navajo Nation. This may include small and/or isolated portions of Navajo Partitioned Lands contiguous to Navajo tribal lands in order to develop more efficient land management.