alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §1599b. Employees abroad: travel expenses; health care

(a) In General.—The Secretary of Defense may provide civilian employees, and members of their families, abroad with benefits that are comparable to certain benefits that are provided by the Secretary of State to members of the Foreign Service and their families abroad as described in subsections (b) and (c). The Secretary may designate the employees and members of families who are eligible to receive the benefits.

(b) Travel and Related Expenses.—The Secretary of Defense may pay travel expenses and related expenses for purposes and in amounts that are comparable to the purposes for which, and the amounts in which, travel and related expenses are paid by the Secretary of State under section 901 of the Foreign Service Act of 1980 (22 U.S.C. 4081).

(c) Health Care Program.—The Secretary of Defense may establish a health care program that is comparable to the health care program established by the Secretary of State under section 904 of the Foreign Service Act of 1980 (22 U.S.C. 4084).

(d) Assistance.—The Secretary of Defense may enter into agreements with the heads of other departments and agencies of the Government in order to facilitate the payment of expenses authorized by subsection (b) and to carry out a health care program authorized by subsection (c).

(e) Abroad Defined.—In this section, the term "abroad" means outside—

(1) the United States; and

(2) the territories and possessions of the United States.

(Added Pub. L. 104–201, div. A, title XVI, §1604(a), Sept. 23, 1996, 110 Stat. 2735.)
#### § 137.3 Construction charges.

Each acre of land in private ownership of said project is hereby charged with $95.25 of construction cost assessable thereto at the date hereof (Dec. 1, 1932), which sum is based upon 50,000 acres of such privately owned lands, making a total charge or assessment due from the owners thereof of $4,762,250 on this date (Dec. 1, 1932), excluding the cost of operation and maintenance for the calendar year of 1933 which may be carried into construction cost as provided for by section 3 of the act of June 7, 1924 (43 Stat. 476), and also excluding interest at the rate of 4 percent which is charged against such lands by said act. Of the 50,000 acres constituting the lands in private ownership within the said project only 46,107.49 acres have at this date (Dec. 1, 1932) actually been designated as coming within the project. Should this present designated area be not increased within a reasonable time herefrom and prior to the due date of the first installment of the charge fixed in this section, namely, on December 1, 1935, so as to bring the total designated area up to the 50,000 acres, the per acre charge fixed in this section shall be proportionately increased against the then designated area so as to assure reimbursement of the total indebtedness due the Government by the owners of the lands in private ownership from the lesser designated acreage.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

# USINDOPACOM Statement on DPRK Missile Launch

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command Public Affairs

We are aware of the ballistic missile launch and are consulting closely with our allies and partners. While we have assessed that this event does not pose an immediate threat to U.S. personnel or territory, or to our allies, the missile launch highlights the destabilizing impact of the DPRK’s unlawful WMD and ballistic missile programs. The U.S. commitments to the defense of the Republic of Korea and Japan remain ironclad.

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION OF CO-CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

** PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES‐OXLEY ACTOF 2002**

I, Mark Gatto, Co-Chief Executive Officer and Co-President, in connection with the Annual Report of CĪON Investment Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013, asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the“Annual Report”), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that:

 

1.       The Annual Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

2.       The informationcontained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

Date:March 19, 2014

 

|   |                                                                                                      |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | /s/ Mark Gatto

Mark  Gatto  Co-Chief Executive Officer and Co-President

*(Principal Executive Officer)* |
|   | CĪON  Investment Corporation                                                                         |

 

 

----
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of The Doe Run
Resources Corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:

The
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended January 31, 2004, of the Company, fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|By:                                                                      |  | /s/JEFFREY L. ZELMS |  | 
|------------------------------------------------------------------------ |  | ------------------- |  | 
|Jeffrey L. Zelms
President & Chief Executive Officer
Date: July 30, 2004 |  |                    

---



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of The Doe Run
Resources Corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:

The
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended January 31, 2004, of the Company, fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|By:                                                         |  | /s/DAVID A. CHAPUT |  | 
|----------------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------ |  | 
|David A. Chaput
Chief Financial Officer
Date: July 30, 2004 |  |                   

---



QuickLinks
§ 21.7 Titles and subtitles. ( a ) The major divisions of the Code are titles, each of which brings together broadly related Government functions.
( b ) Subtitles may be used to distinguish between materials emanating from an overall agency and the material issued by its various components. Subtitles may also be used to group chapters within a title.
#### John Higgins, Appellant, v. Sarah C. Powell and Others, Respondents.

Motion of the respondents denied. Motion of the appellant granted, without costs. Present—Jenks, Hooker, Gaynor, Rich and Miller, JJ.
§ 111.1 Persons to share payments. In making all annuity and other per capita payments, the funds shall be equally divided among the Indians entitled thereto share and share alike. The roll for such payments should be prepared on Form 5-322,[1] in strict alphabetical order by families of husband, wife, and unmarried dependent minor children. Unless otherwise instructed, ( a ) Indians of both sexes may be considered adults at the age of 18 years;
( b ) Deceased enrollees may be carried on the rolls for one payment after death;
( c ) Where final rolls have been prepared constituting the legal membership of the tribe, only Indians whose names appear thereon are entitled to share in future payments, after-born children being excluded and the shares of deceased enrollees paid to the heirs if determined or if not determined credited to the estate pending determination; and
( d ) The shares of competent Indians will be paid to them directly and the shares of incompetents and minors deposited for expenditure under the individual Indian money regulations.

Cross References:
For regulations pertaining to the determination of heirs and approval of wills, see part 15 and subpart G of part 11 of this chapter. For individual Indian money regulations, see part 115 of this chapter. Footnotes -
111.1
[1] Forms may be obtained from the Commissioner of Indian Affairs, Washington, D.C.
IV

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 11

Providing for the designation of certain minority employees.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 6, 1999

Mr. MENENDEZ submitted the following resolution; which was considered and

agreed to

RESOLUTION

Providing for the designation of certain minority employees.

1 Resolved, That pursuant to the Legislative Pay Act

2 of 1929, as amended, the six minority employees author3 ized therein shall be the following named persons, effective

4 January 3, 1999, until otherwise ordered by the House,

5 to-wit: Steve Elmendorf, George Kundanis, Craig Hanna,

6 Sharon Daniels, Dan Turton, and Laura Nichols, each to

7 receive gross compensation pursuant to the provisions of

8 House Resolution 119, Ninety-fifth Congress, as enacted

9 into permanent law by section 115 of Public Law 95–94.

10 In addition, the Minority Leader may appoint and set the
2

HRES 11 ATH

1 annual rate of pay for up to three further minority em2 ployees.

Æ
EXHIBIT 31.3



CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO EXCHANGE ACT RULES 13a-14(a) AND
15d-14(a),

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Jeffrey F. Eisenberg, certify that:



|1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the annual report on Form 10-K of Xenetic Biosciences, Inc.; and
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: April 28, 2022



|By: | /s/ Jeffrey F. Eisenberg     
|--- | -----------------------------
|    | Jeffrey F. Eisenberg         
|    | Chief Executive Officer      
|    | (Principal Executive Officer)
EXHIBIT 32.1





WRITTEN STATEMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND


CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE


SARBANES — OXLEY ACT OF 2002





The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of HMS Income Fund, Inc. (“the Company”), each hereby certifies that to his or her knowledge, on the date hereof:





(a) the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2018 , filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section l3(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(b) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:March 8, 2019By:/s/ SHERRI W. SCHUGARTSherri W. SchugartChairman, Chief Executive Officer and PresidentDate:March 8, 2019By:/s/ RYAN T. SIMSRyan T. SimsChief Financial Officer and Secretary
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 170 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 170

  Amending House Resolution 5, One Hundred Sixth Congress, as amended.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 13, 1999

Mr. Cox (for himself and Mr. Dicks) submitted the following resolution; 
              which was referred to the Committee on Rules

                              May 13, 1999

      The Committee on Rules discharged; considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Amending House Resolution 5, One Hundred Sixth Congress, as amended.

    Resolved,

SECTION 1. AMENDMENT OF HOUSE RESOLUTION 5.

    Section 2(f)(1) of House Resolution 5, One Hundred Sixth Congress, 
agreed to January 6, 1999, as amended, is amended by striking ``May 14, 
1999'' and inserting ``May 31, 1999''.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Daniel J. Forbush, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of General Metals Corporation for the period ended July 31, 2008 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of General Metals Corporation.



|                           |                            |                                                                                                         
|-------------------------- | -------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: September  12, 2008 | General Metals Corporation
|                           |                            |                                                                                                         
|                           |                            |                                                                                                         
|                           | By:                        | /s/ DANIELJ. FORBUSH                                                                                    
|                           |                            | Daniel J. Forbush
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)
|                           |                           



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to General Metals Corporation and will be retained by General Metals Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Item 13

Provide written explanation and supporting documents of how the facility could use NOX CEMs 

for process optimization.

Person(s): that provided information used or considered in responding to the question 

or were consulted in the preparation of the response: Stephani Campbell, Teresa 

Simetkosky, Chrissy Bartovich

Answer:

The indurating furnaces are complicated processes that have numerous variables to operation. 

Each process variable is carefully measured and monitored to ensure the process is running as 

needed. Minntac treats NOx emissions much like any other process variable. In our 

experience specific to NOx, the CEMS units have acted as yet another process indicator that 

could provide notice of an undesired condition, such as preheat burners not being properly lit 

or fuel use being too high. The CEMS data has been used to track emissions trends that may

not otherwise be identified. 

In order to evaluate the performance of the process, having accurate data is essential. Having 

the CEMS enables real time data which shows process changes, as opposed to a snapshot of a 

stack test. A corollary to this is dust collector monitoring. Prior to the Taconite MACT 

readings were taken once per day. Once continuous parametric monitoring was installed we 

learned more about our systems due to the frequency and volume of data being collected.

Having CEMS installed allowed for convenient data collection when conducting NOx 

reduction tests. Having the CEMS data readily available expedited the data collection and 

subsequent review. After the installation of the low NOx main burners on Lines 6 and 7, the 

CEMS enabled U.S. Steel to more quickly evaluate the performance of different operating 

parameters to optimize the burner performance. This is also the case for process 

improvements conducted on the other lines.
#### § 12.23 What are the jurisdictional limits in Indian country?

The Department of the Interior and the Department of Justice must maintain and periodically review and update a memorandum of understanding describing the relationship between the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the Bureau of Indian Affairs in the investigation and prosecution of major crimes in Indian country. Any law enforcement programs performing duties under the authority of 25 U.S.C. 2803 must follow the guidelines in the memorandum of understanding and any local United States Attorney's guidelines for the investigation and prosecution of Federal crimes.
§ 136.3 Repayment of construction costs. Under the terms of the contracts, the landowners agreed to repay the construction cost in forty (40) equal annual installments. Therefore, the annual per acre installment is hereby fixed at seventeen and one-half cents (171 ⁄ 2 cents) per acre, due and payable on December 1st of each year, the first payment being due on December 1, 1955. Under section 4 of the repayment contracts of the landowners and the act of March 10, 1928 (45 Stat. 210), the charges remain a lien against the lands until paid.
§ 304.4 Responsibility for responding to requests. ( a ) *In general.* The agency will be responsible for responding to a request in all respects, except in the case of a referral to another agency as is described in paragraphs (b), (c), and (d) of this section. In determining which records are responsive to a request, the agency ordinarily will include only records in its possession and control as of the date upon which it begins its search for them. If any other date is used, the agency will inform the requester of that date.
( b ) *Consultations and referrals.* When the agency receives a request for a record in its possession and control, it will determine whether another agency of the Federal Government is better able to determine whether the record is exempt from disclosure under the FOIA and, if so, whether it should be disclosed as a matter of administrative discretion. If the agency determines that it is best able to process the record in response to the request, then it will do so. If the agency determines that it is not best able to process the record, then it will either: ( 1 ) Respond to the request regarding that record, after consulting with the agency that is best able to determine whether to disclose it and with any other agency that has a substantial interest in it; or
( 2 ) Refer the responsibility for responding to the request regarding that record to another agency that originated the record (but only if that agency is subject to the FOIA). Ordinarily, the agency that originated a record will be presumed to be best able to determine whether to disclose it.
( c ) *Notice of referral.* When the agency refers all or any part of the responsibility for responding to a request to another agency, it ordinarily will notify the requester of the referral and inform the requester of the name of the agency to which the request has been referred and of the part of the request that has been referred.
( d ) *Timing of responses to consultations and referrals.* All consultations and referrals will be handled according to the date upon which the FOIA request initially was received by the first agency, and not any later date.
( e ) *Agreements regarding consultations and referrals.* The agency may make agreements with other agencies designed to eliminate the need for consultations or referrals regarding particular types of records.
#### The People of the State of New York v. Joseph Russo.

Motion denied on condition that appellant be ready for February term.
### §130a. Department of Defense support for funerals and memorial events for Members and former Members of Congress

(a) Support for Funerals.—Subject to subsection (b), the Secretary of Defense may provide such support as the Secretary considers appropriate for a funeral or memorial event for a Member or former Member of Congress, including support with respect to transportation to and from such a funeral or memorial event, in accordance with this section.

(b) Requests for Support; Secretary Determination.—The Secretary may provide support under this section—

(1) upon request from the Speaker of the House of Representatives, the Minority Leader of the House of Representatives, the Majority Leader of the Senate, or the Minority Leader of the Senate; or

(2) if the Secretary determines such support is necessary to carry out duties or responsibilities of the Department of Defense.

(c) Use of Funds.—The Secretary may use funds authorized to be appropriated for operation and maintenance to provide support under this section.

(Added Pub. L. 117–263, div. A, title X, §1042(a), Dec. 23, 2022, 136 Stat. 2770.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 130a, added Pub. L. 105–85, div. A, title IX, §911(a)(1), Nov. 18, 1997, 111 Stat. 1857; amended Pub. L. 106–65, div. A, title IX, §921(a)(1), Oct. 5, 1999, 113 Stat. 722; Pub. L. 106–398, §1 [[div. A], title IX, §941], Oct. 30, 2000, 114 Stat. 1654, 1654A–241; Pub. L. 108–375, div. A, title X, §1084(d)(2), Oct. 28, 2004, 118 Stat. 2061, related to major Department of Defense headquarters activities personnel, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 110–181, div. A, title IX, §901(a)(1), Jan. 28, 2008, 122 Stat. 272.