Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 33 / Thursday, February 17, 2011 / Notices 9361 

electronic docket (EDIS) at http:// 

edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired 

persons are advised that information on 

this matter can be obtained by 

contacting the Commission’s TDD 

terminal on (202) 205–1810. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

Commission instituted this investigation 

on August 19, 2010, based on a 

complaint filed by Vizio, Inc. of Irvine, 

California. 75 FR 51285–86 (August 19, 

2010). The complaint alleges violations 

of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, 

as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, in the 

importation into the United States, the 

sale for importation, and the sale within 

the United States after importation of 

certain flat panel digital televisions and 

components thereof by reason of 

infringement of certain claims of U.S. 

Patent Nos. 5,703,887 (‘‘the ’887 

patent’’); 5,233,629 (‘‘the ’629 patent’’); 

5,511,096; 5,621,761; 5,745,522; 

5,511,082; and 5,396,518. The 

complaint further alleges the existence 

of a domestic industry. The 

Commission’s notice of investigation 

named the following respondents: LG 

Electronics, Inc. of South Korea and LG 

Electronics, Inc. of Englewood Cliffs, 

New Jersey. 

On November 24, 2010, the 

Commission issued notice of its 

determination not to review the ALJ’s ID 

terminating the investigation as to 

claims 15–21 of the ’887 patent, and all 

asserted claims of the ’629 patent, based 

on withdrawal of these ’887 patent 

claims and the ’629 patent. 

On January 18, 2011, complainant and 

respondents jointly moved to terminate 

the investigation on the basis of a 

settlement agreement. The Commission 

investigative attorney filed a response in 

support of the motion. 

The ALJ issued the subject ID on 

January 26, 2011, granting the motion 

for termination. He found that the 

motion for termination satisfies 

Commission rule 210.21(b). He further 

found, pursuant to Commission rule 

210.50(b)(2), that termination of this 

investigation by settlement agreement is 

in the public interest. No party 

petitioned for review of the ID. The 

Commission has determined not to 

review the ID, and the investigation is 

terminated. 

The authority for the Commission’s 

determination is contained in section 

337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, and in 

sections 210.21 and 210.42(h) of the 

Commission’s Rules of Practice and 

Procedure, 19 CFR 210.21, 210.42(h). 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: February 11, 2011. 

William R. Bishop, 

Hearings and Meetings Coordinator. 

[FR Doc. 2011–3538 Filed 2–16–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Public Availability of Department of 

Justice FY 2010 Service Contract 

Inventory 

AGENCY: Justice Management Division, 

Department of Justice. 

ACTION: Notice of Public Availability of 

FY 2010 Service Contract Inventories. 

SUMMARY: In accordance with Section 

743 of Division C of the Consolidated 

Appropriations Act of 2010 (Pub. L. 

111–117), the Department of Justice is 

publishing this notice to advise the 

public of the availability of the FY 2010 

Service Contract inventory. This 

inventory provides information on 

service contract actions over $25,000 

that were made in FY 2010. The 

information is organized by function to 

show how contracted resources are 

distributed throughout the agency. The 

inventory has been developed in 

accordance with guidance issued on 

November 5, 2010 by the Office of 

Management and Budget’s Office of 

Federal Procurement Policy (OFPP). 

OFPP’s guidance is available at http:// 

www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/ 

omb/procurement/memo/servicecontract-inventories-guidance11052010.pdf. The Department of 

Justice has posted its inventory and a 

summary of the inventory on the 

Department of Justice Senior 

Procurement Executive homepage at the 

following link: http://www.justice.gov/ 

jmd/pe/service-contract-inventory.html. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Questions regarding the service contract 

inventory should be directed to Dennis 

R. McCraw in the Justice Management 

Division, Management and Planning 

Staff, Procurement Policy and Review 

Group at (202) 616–3754 or 

dennis.mccraw@usdoj.gov. 

Michael H. Allen, 

Deputy Assistant Attorney General, Policy 

Management and Planning, U.S. Department 

of Justice, Justice Management Division. 

[FR Doc. 2011–3561 Filed 2–16–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4410–DB–P 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

Employee Benefits Security 

Administration 

Exemptions From Certain Prohibited 

Transaction Restrictions 

AGENCY: Employee Benefits Security 

Administration, Labor. 

ACTION: Grant of individual exemptions. 

SUMMARY: This document contains 

exemptions issued by the Department of 

Labor (the Department) from certain of 

the prohibited transaction restrictions of 

the Employee Retirement Income 

Security Act of 1974 (ERISA or the Act) 

and/or the Internal Revenue Code of 

1986 (the Code). This notice includes 

the following: D–11591, Citigroup Inc. 

and its affiliates (Citigroup), the 

Citigroup 401(k) Plan, the Citibuilder 

401(k) Plan for Puerto Rico (the 

Citibuilder Plan and collectively with 

the Citigroup 401(k) Plan, the 

Participant Directed Plans), the 

Citigroup Pension Plan (and collectively 

with the Participant Directed Plans, the 

Plans) (the Applicants), PTE 2011–04; 

and D–11592, TD Ameritrade, Inc. (TD 

Ameritrade), 2011–05. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A notice 

was published in the Federal Register of 

the pendency before the Department of 

a proposal to grant such exemption. The 

notice set forth a summary of facts and 

representations contained in the 

application for exemption and referred 

interested persons to the application for 

a complete statement of the facts and 

representations. The application has 

been available for public inspection at 

the Department in Washington, DC. The 

notice also invited interested persons to 

submit comments on the requested 

exemption to the Department. In 

addition the notice stated that any 

interested person might submit a 

written request that a public hearing be 

held (where appropriate). The applicant 

has represented that it has complied 

with the requirements of the notification 

to interested persons. No requests for a 

hearing were received by the 

Department. Public comments were 

received by the Department as described 

in the granted exemption. 

The notice of proposed exemption 

was issued and the exemption is being 

granted solely by the Department 

because, effective December 31, 1978, 

section 102 of Reorganization Plan No. 

4 of 1978, 5 U.S.C. App. 1 (1996), 

transferred the authority of the Secretary 

of the Treasury to issue exemptions of 

the type proposed to the Secretary of 

Labor. 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES