alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 13.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with
the annual report on Form 20-F of GasLog Ltd., a Bermuda exempted company (the “Company”), for the period ending December
31, 2016, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned officer
of the Company certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:



| | 1. | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in the report.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



The foregoing certification
is provided solely for purposes of complying with the provisions of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not intended
to be used or relied upon for any other purpose.



| |     |  | Date: March 1, 2017            | 
| | --- |  | ------------------------------ | 
| | By: |  | /s/ Simon Crowe                | 
| |     |  | Name: Simon Crowe              | 
| |     |  | Title: Chief Financial Officer |
EXHIBIT 23.2

Consent of Kost Forer Gabbay & Kasierer, A Member of Ernst & Young Global

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 of Marlborough Software Development Holdings Inc., File
No. 333-179990, of our report dated August 17, 2010, with respect to the carve-out consolidated financial statements of the Business Acquired from Press-Sense Ltd. (by Bitstream Inc.) for the year ended December 31, 2009 included in
the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011 of Marlborough Software Development Holdings Inc.

Tel-Aviv, Israel

March 30, 2012



|                                  
|----------------------------------
|                                  
|/s/ KOST FORER GABBAY and KASIERER
|A Member of Ernest & Young Global
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

January 15, 2020

No. 04

- 20

- 00003

- CR

IN RE Seth BATTERTON

Original Mandamus Proceeding 1

ORDER

On January 2, 2020, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus. Because this court does not

have jurisdiction to address relator’s complaint, the petition for writ of mandamus is dismissed for lack

of jurisdiction. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 52.8(a).

It is so ORDERED on January 15, 2020

.

_____________________________ Irene Rios, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 15th day of January, 2020

.

_____________________________ Michael A. Cruz, Clerk of Court

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 5970, styled The State of Texas v. Seth McCague Batterton , pending in the

216th Judicial District Court, Gillespie County, Texas, the Honorable Rex Emerson presiding.
# C_2013289EN.01001001.xml

| 4.10.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 289/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.10.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 289/10

---

Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries

2013/C 289/05

In accordance with Article 35(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), a decision has been taken to close the fishery as set down in the following table:

1

| Date and time of closure | 14.9.2013 |
| --- | --- |
| Duration | 14.9.2013-31.12.2013 |
| Member State | Portugal |
| Stock or group of stocks | Norway lobster (Nephrops norvegicus) |
| Species | NEP/9/3411 |
| Zone | IX and X; EU waters of CECAF 34.1.1 |
| Type(s) of fishing vessels | — |
| Reference number | 53/TQ39 |

Date and time of closure

14.9.2013

Duration

14.9.2013-31.12.2013

Member State

Portugal

Stock or group of stocks

Norway lobster (Nephrops norvegicus)

Nephrops norvegicus

Species

NEP/9/3411

Zone

IX and X; EU waters of CECAF 34.1.1

Type(s) of fishing vessels

—

Reference number

53/TQ39

---

(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.

1

---
Exhibit 33.1(b)



|     |  |  |                   |                                                                      
|---- |  |  | ----------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------
|LOGO |  |  |                   | 260 Interstate North Circle, SE
Atlanta, GA 30339-2210 T 770.763.1000
|     |  | 
|     |  | 
|     |  |  | www.assurant.corn

REPORT ON ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH

§1122(d)(2)(vi), §1122(d)(4)(xi) and §1122(d)(4)(xii)

of REGULATION AB SERVICING CRITERIA

FOR THE REPORTING PERIOD

JANUARY 1, 2015 TO DECEMBER 31, 2015

American Security Insurance Company, Standard Guaranty Insurance Company and TrackSure Insurance Agency, Inc. (collectively, the Asserting Party)
is responsible for assessing compliance for the period of January 1, 2015 through December 31, 2015 (the Reporting Period) with the servicing criteria set forth in §1122(d)(2)(vi), §1122(d)(4)(xi) and §1122(d)(4)(xii) of
Title 17, §229.1122(d) of the Code of Federal Regulations, (the Applicable Servicing Criteria) which the Asserting Party has concluded are applicable to the insurance escrow servicing activities it performs with respect to all
mortgage backed securities transactions that were registered after January 1, 2006 with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933 (the Platform Transactions). The Asserting Party used the criteria set
forth in paragraph (d) of Item 1122 of Regulation AB to assess the compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.

The Asserting Party has assessed
its compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria for the Reporting Period and has concluded that the Asserting Party has complied, in all material respects, with the Applicable Servicing Criteria for the Reporting Period with respect to the
Platform Transactions.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report on the assessment
of compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria as of and for the Reporting Period,



|                                                                                              |  |             
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------
|American Security Insurance Company
Standard Guaranty Insurance Company                      
|TrackSure Insurance Agency, Inc.                                                             
|                                                                                             
|/s/ John Frobose                                                                             
|By:                                                                                           |  | John Frobose
|President of American Security Insurance Company and Standard Guaranty Insurance Company, and
|Sr. Vice President of TrackSure Insurance Agency, Inc.                                       
|                                                                                             
|Date: February 8, 2016
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE

AT NASHVILLE

RODNEY LAMONT LOVE v. STATE OF TENNESSEE 

Criminal Court for Davidson County

No. 98-C-2232

No. M2009-00036-CCA-R3-PC - Filed August 27, 2009

The Appellant appeals the trial court's dismissal of his petition for post conviction relief. The

Appellant filed his petition outside the statute of limitations. Accordingly, the judgment of the

trial court is affirmed.

Tenn. R. App. P. 3; Judgment of the Trial Court Affirmed Pursuant to Rule 20, Rules of

the Court of Criminal Appeals

THOMAS T. WOODALL, J., delivered the opinion of the court, in which JERRY L. SMITH, and

ROBERT W. WEDEMEYER, J.J., joined.

Rodney Lamont Love, pro se.

Robert E. Cooper, Jr., Attorney General & Reporter; Benjamin A. Ball, Assistant Attorney

General, for the appellee, State of Tennessee.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

The Appellant pled guilty in these cases in January of 1999. He received an effective five

year sentence. Although his sentence in this case has expired, the Appellant is currently serving

a federal sentence which apparently was enhanced based on his convictions in this case. The

Appellant filed the instant petition for post-conviction relief on October 30, 2008. The trial court

concluded that the petition was filed beyond the statute of limitations and summarily dismissed

the same. The Appellant appealed. The State filed a motion to affirm the judgment of the trial

court pursuant to Court of Criminal Appeals Rule 20. The Court finds this motion to be welltaken.

The Appellant's post-conviction petition is clearly barred by the statute of limitations. 

Tennessee Code Annotated Section 40-30-102(a) provides that a petition for post-conviction

relief must be filed within one year of final judgment. The Appellant filed his petition well over

nine years after the entry of his guilty pleas. The Post-Conviction Procedure Act enumerates few

exceptions to this one year time limit. See Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-30-102(b). In order to qualify,
the claim in the petition must be based upon a new rule of constitutional law requiring

retrospective application, must be based upon new scientific evidence establishing actual

innocence, or must assert relief from sentences which were enhanced because of a previous

conviction that has subsequently found to be illegal. Id. None of these exceptions apply in this

case.

The Appellant argues on appeal that due process concerns should toll the running of the

statute of limitations because otherwise he will not be afforded the opportunity to challenge his

state court convictions which were used to enhance his federal sentence. The Appellant's

argument is without merit. See, e.g., Jason Earl Hill v. State, No. E2005-00968-CCA-R3-PC,

2006 WL 389667 (Tenn. Crim. App., Feb. 16, 2006), perm. to app. denied, (Tenn., Sep. 5, 2006)

(tolling of statute not required when petitioner waited to file post-conviction petition until after

his federal sentence enhanced based on prior state convictions).

For the reasons stated above, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance

with Rule 20. 

____________________________________

THOMAS T. WOODALL, JUDGE

2
#### Le Roy S. Gove v. Levi L. Tower and Others.

Motion granted.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

        STATEMENT OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER UNDER 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

     I, Paul H. Bartlett, the chief financial officer of Critical Path, Inc.
(the "Company"), certify for the purposes of section 1350 of chapter 63 of title
18 of the United States Code that, to my knowledge,:

     (i) the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the quarterly
period ended June 30, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements
of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

     (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Date: August 14, 2003                     /s/ Paul H. Bartlett
                           -----------------------------------------------------
                                             Paul H. Bartlett
                           Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
has been provided to Critical Path, Inc. and will be retained by Critical Path,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.

------------------
(1) The material contained in this Exhibit 32.2 is not deemed "filed" with the
SEC and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company
under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, whether
made before or after the date hereof and irrespective of any general
incorporation language contained in such filing.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

# F-35 Lightning II Demonstration Comes to Misawa 

By Airman 1st Class Patrick S. Ciccarone35th Fighter Wing Public Affairs

                MISAWA AIR BASE, Japan  –              

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

pacom

news

articles
- 399 -

Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets

309 Nebraska Reports

STATE v. MALONE

Cite as 309 Neb. 399

State of Nebraska, appellee, v. 

Kevin W. Malone, appellant.

___ N.W.2d ___

Filed June 4, 2021. Nos. S-20-118, S-20-460. 

supplemental opinion

Appeals from the District Court for Douglas County: Shelly 

R. Stratman, Judge. Former opinion modified. Motion for 

rehearing overruled.

Richard L. Boucher and Bradley H. Supernaw, of Boucher 

Law Firm, for appellant.

Douglas J. Peterson, Attorney General, and Melissa R. 

Vincent for appellee.

Heavican, C.J., Miller-Lerman, Cassel, Stacy, Funke, 

Papik, and Freudenberg, JJ.

Per Curiam.

This case is before us on a motion for rehearing filed by the 

appellant, Kevin W. Malone, concerning our opinion in State 

v. Malone, 308 Neb. 929, 957 N.W.2d 892 (2021). We find 

no substantive merit to Malone’s motion and overrule it, but 

modify the opinion as follows:

In the analysis section, under the heading “2. Postconvic

tion Relief” and the subheading “(b) Claim of Prosecutorial 

Misconduct,” id. at 962, 957 N.W.2d at 920, we withdraw the 

second paragraph and substitute the following:

Nebraska Supreme Court Online Library

www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/

08/20/2021 09:13 AM CDT
- 400 -

Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets

309 Nebraska Reports

STATE v. MALONE

Cite as 309 Neb. 399

The district court first rejected this argument as procedurally barred. However, Malone had amended his 

motion to add an allegation that his appellate counsel had 

been ineffective for failing to raise the claims of prosecutorial misconduct on direct appeal. The district court 

alternatively rejected Malone’s claim, reasoning that even 

if not procedurally barred, the claim failed to “set forth 

the facts and applicable law to establish an objection 

based on any of these prosecutorial [misconduct] claims 

would . . . have been successful.” We agree.

The remainder of the opinion shall remain unmodified.

Former opinion modified.

Motion for rehearing overruled.
### **CHAPTER 829—MISCELLANEOUS PROHIBITIONS AND PENALTIES**

Sec.
8253.
Loans: Supply Corps officers.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**2018**—Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, §807(e)(2)(A), (f)(1), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1837, 1838, redesignated chapter 559 of this title as this chapter and item 6113 as 8253.

**1980**—Pub. L. 96–513, title V, §513(12), Dec. 12, 1980, 94 Stat. 2932, struck out item 6111 "Pay: withheld during absence due to use of drugs or alcohol".

**1968**—Pub. L. 90–235, §6(a)(4), (9), Jan. 2, 1968, 81 Stat. 762, struck out item 6114 "Civilian employment: enlisted members", and item 6116 "Service credit: officers; service as midshipman or cadet not counted".

**1967**—Pub. L. 90–83, §3(5), Sept. 11, 1967, 81 Stat. 220, struck out item 6112 "Pay: officers; withheld while employed by certain contractors".

**1958**—Pub. L. 85–861, §1(136), Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1507, struck out item 6115 "Drill pay; uniform gratuity: time limit for filing claim".
Document

EXHIBIT 10.2

AMENDMENT ONE
TO THE 
REGIONS FINANCIAL CORPORATION NON-QUALIFIED EXCESS 401(k) PLAN
(AMENDED AND RESTATED AS OF JUNE 1, 2020)




Regions Financial Corporation hereby amends the Regions Financial Corporation Non-Qualified Excess 401(k) Plan, effective as of October 19, 2021, as follows:    


1.    Section 3.2(a) of the Plan is hereby amended by inserting the following as the second to last paragraph in said Section: 


Notwithstanding the foregoing, a Participant whose benefit is frozen in the Regions Financial Corporation Post 2006 Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan on or after October 19, 2021, and transferred to this Plan as described in Section 4.6, shall not make a form of distribution election under this Plan for such benefits.  Rather, such transferred benefits shall be paid in the same form and manner and at the same time such benefit would have been paid under the Regions Financial Corporation Post 2006 Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan as in effect on the date of such transfer.  


2.    Except as otherwise amended herein, the Plan shall continue in full force and effect.
§ 143.2 Purpose. ( a ) The purpose of the regulations in this part is to establish procedures for the assessment, billing, and collection of charges for goods/services provided to non-Federal users.
( b ) The Assistant Secretary may sell or contract to sell to non-Federal users within, or in the immediate vicinity of an Indian Reservation (or former Reservation), any of the following goods/services if it is determined that the goods/services are not available from another local source or providing that goods/services is in the best interest of the Indian tribes or individual Indians. The goods/services include, but are not limited to: ( 1 ) Electric power;
( 2 ) Water;
( 3 ) Sewage operations;
( 4 ) Landfill operations;
( 5 ) Steam;
( 6 ) Compressed air;
( 7 ) Telecommunications;
( 8 ) Natural, manufactured, or mixed gas;
( 9 ) Fuel oil;
( 10 ) Landscaping; and
( 11 ) Garbage collections.
Exhibit 12.1  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO EXCHANGE ACT RULE 13A-14(A)/15D-14(A) AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  I, Dmitry Loshchinin, certify that:  1.I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Luxoft Holding, Inc;  2.Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3.Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4.The companys other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company and have:  (a)Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b)Evaluated the effectiveness of the companys disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  (c)Disclosed in this report any change in the companys internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the companys internal control over financial reporting; and  5.The companys other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the companys auditors and the audit committee of the companys board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  (a)All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b)Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the companys internal control over financial reporting.   /s/ Dmitry LoshchininDmitry LoshchininPresident and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)  Dated: July 11, 2014