alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 198 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 198

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that James Francis 
   Thorpe should be designated ``America's Athlete of the Century''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 27, 1999

  Mr. Kanjorski (for himself and Mr. Watkins) submitted the following 
  resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that James Francis 
   Thorpe should be designated ``America's Athlete of the Century''.

Whereas James Francis Thorpe, known as ``Jim Thorpe'' Wathahuck-Brightpath, of 
        the Thunder Clan of the Sac and Fox Tribe, was born May 22, 1887, on the 
        Sac and Fox Indian Reservation, Prague, Oklahoma, and died March 28, 
        1953, in Lomita, California;
Whereas Jim Thorpe began his amateur football career as a student at the 
        Carlisle Indian School in Pennsylvania, where he was named All American 
        Half-Back in 1911 and 1912;
Whereas Jim Thorpe represented the United States at the 1912 Olympic Games held 
        in Stockholm, Sweden, though he did not become a citizen of the United 
        States until 1917;
Whereas King Gustav V of Sweden said, ``You, Sir, are the greatest athlete in 
        the world,'' when he awarded 2 gold medals to Jim Thorpe for winning the 
        pentathlon and the decathlon;
Whereas Jim Thorpe founded professional football, played professional football 
        for, and later was the first elected president of, the American Football 
        Association (now the National Football League);
Whereas Jim Thorpe played major league baseball for 20 years with the New York 
        Giants, the Cincinnati Reds, and the Boston Braves;
Whereas Jim Thorpe is the only American athlete to excel at the amateur level 
        and at the professional level in 3 major sports--track and field, 
        football, and baseball;
Whereas Jim Thorpe was named America's Greatest All-Around Athlete in 1950 by 
        the Associated Press and in 1977 by Sport Magazine; and
Whereas Jim Thorpe has been enshrined in the Helms Professional Football Hall of 
        Fame and the Professional Football Hall of Fame in Canton, Ohio: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the United States House of Representatives 
designates James Francis Thorpe ``America's Athlete of the Century''.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 2 3 - 0206 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. KATHAN DEVERNON JOHNSON ,

Defendant and Appellant .

**G RANT**  Pursuant to authority granted under Mont. R. App. P. 26(1), the Appellant is given an extension of time until July 12 , 2023 , to prepare, file, and serve the Appellant’s opening brief.

Electronically signed by: Bowen Greenwood Clerk of the Supreme Court June 5 2023

06/05/2023

Case Number: DA 23-0206
EXHIBIT 13.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report on Form 20-F of GasLog Ltd., a corporation organized under the laws of Bermuda (the Company), for the period ending December 31, 2012, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned officer of
  the Company certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|  
|--
|1.
|  
|2.

The foregoing certification is provided solely for purposes of complying with the provisions of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not intended to be used or relied upon for any other purpose.

|    |  |                                     
|--- |  | ------------------------------------
|    |  | Date: March 28, 2013                
|By: |  | /s/ Paul Wogan                      
|    |  | Name: Paul Wogan                    
|    |  | Title: Chief Executive
      Officer



---
REPORT ON ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION’S REGULATION AB SERVICING CRITERIA

For the calendar year ending December
31, 2018, National Tax Search, LLC has been a Tax Service Vendor for Wells Fargo Bank N.A.(the “Servicer”).

National Tax Search, LLC (“NTS”)
is responsible for assessing compliance as of December 31, 2018 and for the period from January 1, 2018 through December 31, 2018
(the “Reporting Period”) with the servicing criteria set forth in Title 17, Section 229.1122(d) of the Code of Federal
Regulations (the “CFR”). NTS has used the servicing criteria communicated to NTS by the Servicer to assess compliance
with the applicable servicing criteria. Only servicing criteria 1122(d)(l)(ii), 1122(d)(1)(iv), 1122(d)(2)(ii), 1122 (d)(2)(v),
1122(d)2(vi), 1122(d)(4)(xi), and 1122(d)(4)(xii) (the “Applicable Servicing Criteria”) are applicable to the activities
NTS performs with respect to the transactions covered by this report. NTS has determined that the remaining servicing criteria
set forth in Item 1122(d) of the SEC Regulation AB are not applicable to the activities it performs with respect to the transactions
covered by this report. The transactions covered by this report include all tax payments made on behalf of the Servicer using NTS’s
TaxQ system (the “Platform Transactions”).

NTS, as a vendor, has assessed its
compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria for the Reporting Period and has concluded that NTS has complied, in all material
respects, with the Applicable Servicing Criteria as of December 31, 2018 and for the Reporting Period with respect to the Platform
Transactions taken as a whole.

Plante & Moran, PLLC, an independent
registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report on the assessment of compliance with the Applicable Servicing
Criteria as of December 31, 2018 and for the Reporting Period as set forth in this assertion.

National Tax Search, LLC, as Vendor to Servicer





Lori D. Eshoo, President/CEO
January 25, 2019

130 S. Jefferson Street

Suite300

Chicago, IL 60661

confidential
#### § 1187.52 How will OIED coordinate with other Federal agencies?

OIED will coordinate with the Secretaries of Agriculture, Commerce, and Treasury, and the Administrator of the Small Business Administration to ensure, to the maximum extent practicable, that awardees have the information and materials they need to provide Native businesses and Native entrepreneurs with the information and assistance necessary to apply for business and entrepreneurial development programs administered by those agencies.
#### § 426.201 General.

This subpart contains the regulations of the National Commission on Military, National, and Public Service (the “Commission”) implementing the Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”), 5 U.S.C. 552, as amended. These regulations set forth procedures for requesting access to records maintained by the Commission. These regulations should be read together with the text of the FOIA, and the Uniform Freedom of Information Fee Schedule and Guidelines published by the Office of Management and Budget (“OMB Guidelines”). Requests made by individuals for records about themselves under the Privacy Act of 1974, 5 U.S.C. 552a, are processed in accordance with the Commission's Privacy Act regulations as well as under this subpart.
### Chattanooga shale and related rocks of central Tennessee and nearby areas

By: Louis C. ConantVernon Emanuel Swanson

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/pp357

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (2397 pdf)                        
  - **Plate 3**                            (1284 pdf)                        
  - **Plate 7**                            (1882 pdf)                        
  - **Plate 8**                            (3414 pdf)                        
  - **Plate 12**                            (1631 pdf)                        
  - **Plate 14**                            (1248 pdf)                        
  - **Plate 15**                            (1901 pdf)                        
  - **Plate 17**                            (629 pdf) 
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
Exhibit 10.21


 


SUBSCRIPTION AGREEMENT


 


To: The Board of Directors of Larkspur Health
Acquisition Corp.


 


The undersigned hereby subscribes for 21,777 shares
of Class B common stock, par value $0.0001 per share (the “Shares”) of Larkspur Health Acquisition Corp, a Delaware
corporation (the “Company”). In consideration for the issue of the Shares, the undersigned hereby agrees and undertakes
to pay $252.49 to the Company.


 


The undersigned agrees to take the Shares subject
to the Certificate of Incorporation of the Company and authorizes you to enter the following name and address in the stockholder ledger
of the Company:


 	 	Name:	Francis Knuettel II
	 	 	 
	 	Address:	116 63rd Street, Apt. 3C
	 	 	New York, NY 10065



 


	Francis Knuettel II	 
	 	 	 
	Signed:	/s/ Francis Knuettel II	 
	Name:	Francis Knuettel II	 
	 	 	 
	Dated:	November 4, 2021	 
	 	 	 
	Accepted: 	 	 
	 	 	 
	Larkspur Health Acquisition Corp.	 
	 	 	 
	Signed:	/s/ Daniel J. O’Connor	 
	Name:	Daniel J. O’Connor	 
	Title:	Chairman; Chief Executive Officer	 
	 	 	 
	Dated:	November 4, 2021
#### Clarence Hicks v. The State.

No. 22941.

Delivered November 22, 1944.

The opinion states the case.

*Noah Roark,*of Dallas, for appellant.

*607
      *Ernest S. Goens,*State’s Attorney, of Austin, for the State.

KRUEGER, Judge.

The conviction is for burglary. The punishment assessed is confinement in the State penitentiary for a term of two years.

The record in this case fails to show that any sentence - was ever pronounced against the appellant, in the absence of which this court is without jurisdiction to entertain the appeal. See Bernard v. State, 170 S. W. (2d) 231, and authorities cited. See also cases cited under Art. 769, Vernon’s Ann. Tex. C. C. P., Vol. 3, also Cumulative Pocket Part (1944), pages 93 and 94.

The appeal is dismissed.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
SS DS SS DS SS DS

1 1,628.60 $ 2,666.69 $ $ 802.29 $ 1,267.58 ─ ─

2 2,000.46 $ 3,183.65 $ $ 1,174.15 $ 1,784.54 ─ ─3 ─ ─ $ 1,924.46 $ 2,575.69 ─ ─4 ─ ─ $ 1,924.46 $ 924.30 2,575.69 $ 972.32 $ 

5 ──── $ 1,912.89 1,494.39 $ 

6 ──── $ 3,703.23 3,231.19 $ 7 ──── $ 3,967.35 3,386.83 $ 8 ──── $ 3,967.35 3,386.83 $ 

IECC Climate Zones

From Current HUD MHCSS to IECC 2015: Impact on First Cost ($)

HUD Thermal Zones

123
### IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DA 20

- 0579

_________________ ALLAN G. HOLMS, a Montana Corporation d/b/a HOLMS & ASSOCIATES,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v. MARK A. BRETZ,

Defendant and Appellant. O R D E R

_________________ Thi s Court reviews briefs to ensure compliance with Rules 11 and 12 of the Montana Rules of Appellate Procedure. After reviewing the Appellant ’ s Opening B rief filed on March 19 , 202 1 , this Court has determined that the brief does not comply with the following Rul e
. M. R. App. P. 12(1)(h) requires that the relevant judgment, order, findings of fact, conclusions of law, jury instruction, ruling or decision from which the appeal is taken, together with any written memorandum or rationale of the court, be contained in Appellant’s brief to this Court. Although it makes reference to an attached appendix, the appendix was not submitted, and A ppellants ’ brief does not include a copy of the relevant judgment(s) or order(s)

. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Appe llant Mark A. Bretz shall file electronically an appendix including the relevant judgment(s) or order(s ) from the District Court. Pursuant to Rule 1 2(4) of the Temporary Electronic Filing Rules, Appellant shall submit a paper copy of the appendix with each of the seven pap er copies of the electronically filed brie f

. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the times for any subsequent briefing contained in M. R. App. P. 13 shall run from the date of filing of the relevant judgment or order

. The Clerk is directed to provide a true copy of this Order to counsel for the Appellant and to all counsel of record. Electronically signed by: Beth Baker Justice, Montana Supreme Court

March 22 2021

03/22/2021

Case Number: DA 20-0579
§ 304.2 Proactive disclosures. ( a ) Records that the FOIA requires ACUS to make regularly available for public inspection in an electronic format, including any records that have been requested three or more times, or were previously released and are likely to become the subject of subsequent requests or appear to be of general interest, may be accessed through the agency's Web site at *https://www.acus.gov .* A subject matter index of such records (or comparable tool) may also be accessed through the agency's Web site and will be updated on an ongoing basis.
( b ) Information routinely provided to the public as part of a regular agency activity, including information posted on the agency's Web site (for example, press releases or recommendations adopted by the Conference pursuant to the Administrative Conference Act, 5 U.S.C. 591 *et seq.*), may be provided to the public without following this subpart.
( c ) Any requester needing assistance in locating proactively disclosed or other agency records may contact the agency's FOIA Public Liaison at (202) 480-2080.
[82 FR 7632, Jan. 23, 2017]
EXHIBIT
 32.1

CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO

18
                            U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION
                                    906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
                                         connection with the Annual Report of Xenetic Biosciences, Inc. (the Company)
                                         on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013, as filed with the Securities
                                         and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), we, the undersigned
                                         officers of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
                                         to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of our knowledge:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated:
February 18, 2015

By:
                             /s/ Michael Scott Maguire

Michael
Scott Maguire

Chief
                         Executive Officer, President and Director

By:
/s/ Colin William Hill

Colin
                                  William Hill

Chief
Financial Officer
### §12402. Army and Air National Guard of the United States: commissioned officers; duty in National Guard Bureau

(a) The President may, with their consent, order commissioned officers of the Army National Guard of the United States and the Air National Guard of the United States to active duty in the National Guard Bureau.

(b)(1) The number of officers of the Army National Guard of the United States in grades below brigadier general who are ordered to active duty in the National Guard Bureau may not be more than 40 percent of the number of officers of the Army authorized for duty in that Bureau and, to the extent practicable, shall not exceed 40 percent of the number of officers of the Army serving in that Bureau in any grade below brigadier general.

(2) The number of officers of the Air National Guard of the United States in grades below brigadier general who are ordered to active duty in the National Guard Bureau may not be more than 40 percent of the number of officers of the Air Force authorized for duty in that Bureau and, to the extent practicable, shall not exceed 40 percent of the number of officers of the Air Force serving in that Bureau in any grade below brigadier general.

(Added Pub. L. 103–337, div. A, title XVI, §1662(f)(1), Oct. 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 2993; amended Pub. L. 104–106, div. A, title XV, §1501(b)(18)(B), Feb. 10, 1996, 110 Stat. 497.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

Provisions similar to those in this section were contained in sections 3496 and 8496 of this title, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 103–337, §1662(f)(2).

#### Amendments

1996—Pub. L. 104–106 inserted "the" in section catchline.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1996 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 104–106 effective as if included in the Reserve Officer Personnel Management Act, title XVI of Pub. L. 103–337, as enacted on Oct. 5, 1994, see section 1501(f)(3) of Pub. L. 104–106, set out as a note under section 113 of this title.

#### Effective Date

Section effective Dec. 1, 1994, except as otherwise provided, see section 1691 of Pub. L. 103–337, set out as a note under section 10001 of this title.
Regulatory Evaluation 

Docket No. FAA- Directorate Identifier: -AD 

/fyou make cha11ges to the mlues i11tht! table beltPrF. you must ensure tile totals update accordingly. If 

t111!y do not, click (or Tab) iuto und then out o.fi!le changed cell. 

Estimated Costs: 

Action Costs per Product (e.g., aircraft, engine, 

(e.g., Inspection, propeller, appliance) 

replacement) Work-hours Labor Parts Cost Total Costs Number of Total Cost 

Do no/ include on- (include cost (labor + u.s. for U.S. Fleet 

condition costs here access, testing, (@$85/h parts) Registered 

and close-up) our) Products 

Open Access 10.0 .) {' $0 ;.::; 00 15 t2,7S.) oo 

Clean and Apply 

1- ( I () Reinforcing 16.0 so ... ; t 15 ~ 

t Overcoat 

Close Access 10.0 ,. (J tl I $0 ... i ) ., 15 1').7"() (J(J 

~ I) (; ( /l(l {' .0• j 

. ( n: I) (II) 0 (l() 

•J or ,,,,)(1 0 1)0 

(I,()( ' ljn(} t (H) 

l)(;: (l ( •(1 01)0 

(• (){ 01} ., I~ IHl 

O.Oi (I l(l :;. 

tG. I) \10 

•) ()( 0 0(1 .-. (I ()(I 

~·m (J •(J \ I'• (It I 

'hi (I 0(1 Cl)r 

{1,0( '_l(ltj <., 1) ()I) 

~ •}_()' (_ i(l .'> {) 1)1 I 

~~.o. 1J on 1\ (ll 

" 10 (l ~l(l ( 1)1 

~ ~· (: 1J \H) 0 {ltl 

{, (I ll(l Otl' 

The known number of products in compliance: 

Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $45,900 

Costs covered under warranty (if known) $ 

On-Condition Costs: 

Action Work-hours Labor cost Parts Cost Cost per Product 

(e.g., Inspection, (include access, (@$85/hour) 

replacement) testing, and closeup) 

'S 0 Oll h non 

~ I ( ;. 

'\ I .l'O h oJl 

~ 0. (}() 'j; (l.!.O 
Special considerations for Economic Analysis (Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table 

that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs): 

Executive Order 12866: 

Could the AD be considered a "significant regulato1y action"? ~ 

YES* 0 NO [gj 

*Explanation: 

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures: 

Is the AD significant? - ' 

YES* 0 NO [gj 

*Explanation: 

Regulatory Flexibility Act: 

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Explain for 

either a Yes or No answer .•. 

YES 0 NO[gj 

Explanation: 

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska: 

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for 

aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation? · 

YES* 0 NO [gj 

*Explanation:
§ 1000.226 On what basis may the Secretary deny a waiver request? The Secretary may deny a waiver request if: ( a ) For a Title-I-eligible program, the requested waiver is prohibited by Federal law; or
( b ) For a non-Title-I-eligible program, the requested waiver is: ( 1 ) Prohibited by Federal law; or
( 2 ) Inconsistent with the express provisions of the AFA.
#### § 141.22 Subleasing prohibited.

No licensee may lease, sublet, rent, or sell any building that the licensee occupies for any purpose to any person without the approval of the Commissioner and the consent of the tribe.
'arraguirre 

J. 

judgment as final pursuant to NRCP 54(b). NRAP 3A(b)(1); NRAP 

3A(b)(8); Lee v. GNLV Corp., 116 Nev. 424, 996 P.2d 416 (2000). The 

following appeared to remain pending below: respondent's claim for a 

deficiency judgment against appellant South Strip Partnership II. We 

noted that, while the district court's order awarded a judgment against the 

guarantor appellants, the judgment did not mention the borrower, South 

Strip Partnership II. 

In its January 23, 2013, response to our show cause order, 

respondent City National Bank indicates that, while judgment was orally 

rendered against South Strip Partnership II, that entity's name was 

inadvertently omitted from the judgment. City National Bank asks this 

court to stay the appeal and/or remand the matter to the district court to 

correct the judgment. No certification or other indication of the district 

court's inclination to grant relief was attached. To date, appellants have 

not responded to our show cause order, and it appears that no further 

filings or proceedings have occurred in the district court. Accordingly, as 

no written judgment or other order formally disposing of the claims 

against South Strip Partnership II has been entered, no final judgment 

exists. Lee, 116 Nev. 424, 996 P.2d 416. Since no final judgment exists, 

the district court retains jurisdiction, and no remand is necessary. As we 

lack jurisdiction, we 

ORDER these appeals DISMISSED. 

AAA , J. 

Hardesty 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

(0) 1947A 

2 

lijaZ 
cc: Hon. Douglas W. Herndon, District Judge 

Robert F. Saint-Aubin, Settlement Judge 

Ales & Bryson 

Holland & Hart LLP/Las Vegas 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

3
#### § 141.30 Retaliation prohibited.

No licensee may refuse service to any customer for the purpose of retaliating against that customer for enforcing or attempting to enforce the regulations of this part.