alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document

AMENDMENT TO THE
OMNICELL, INC. 2009 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN


WHEREAS, Omnicell, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), maintains the Omnicell, Inc. 2009 Equity Incentive Plan (the “Plan”); 


WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 2(b) of the Plan, the Board of Directors of the Company (the “Board”) has the authority to amend the Plan as it shall deem advisable, subject to any requirement of stockholder approval required by applicable law, rule or regulation; and


WHEREAS, the Board desires to amend the Plan to permit the Board or the Committee to delegate certain administrative authority, including certain granting authority, to members of the Board and officers of the Company. 
 
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Plan hereby is amended as follows, effective as of August 12, 2021: 


1.Section 2(c) of the Plan is amended to add the following new subjection (iii): 
(iii) The Board or Committee may delegate some or all of its power and authority hereunder to a member of the Board, the President and Chief Executive Officer or such other executive officer of the Company as the Board or Committee deems appropriate; provided, however, that neither the Board nor the Committee may delegate its power and authority to a member of the Board, the President and Chief Executive Officer or other executive officer of the Company with regard to the selection for participation in this Plan of an officer, director or other person subject to Section 16 of the Exchange Act or decisions concerning the timing, pricing or amount of an award to such an officer, director or other person.


2.Except as modified herein, the remaining terms of the Plan shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect.
*    *    *
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this instrument to be executed by its duly authorized agent as of October 28, 2021. 


OMNICELL, INC.
By: /s/ Dan S. Johnston 
Name: Dan S. Johnston     
Title: Chief Legal & Administrative Officer, Corporate Secretary
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Yokota gears up for a simulated deployment during BM 24-1

By Staff Sgt. Taylor Slater,374th Airlift Wing Public Affairs

                YOKOTA AIR BASE, Japan  –              
Military members assigned to the 374th Airlift Wing embarked on a simulated deployment Oct. 19 during Exercise Beverly Morning 24-1 at Yokota Air Base, Japan.

This exercise, designed to prepare Airmen for contingencies, serves as a crucible for enhancing efficiency and readiness in the face of real-world crises. It is an essential part of Yokota Air Base's commitment to maintaining peak operational performance.

The simulated deployment encompassed comprehensive field briefings from the base legal office, public affairs, medical, finance, and chaplain services. The goal is to ensure that all personnel are well-informed about the wealth of resources available when they are deployed to remote locations. This process underlines Yokota's commitment to supporting its personnel throughout their missions, no matter where they may be.

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

374 AW

simulated deployment

INDOPACOM

Airmen

readiness

MOPP
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 32 (Wednesday, February 16, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 9012]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-3457]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ID-6223-002]


Favinger, Thomas G.; Notice of Filing

    Take notice that on January 31, 2011 Thomas G. Favinger submitted 
for filing, an application for authority to hold interlocking 
positions, pursuant to Section 305(b) of the Federal Power Act and part 
45 of Title 18 of the Code of Federal Regulations, 18 CFR 45.7.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, 
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. On or 
before the comment date, it is not necessary to serve motions to 
intervene or protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#51171403121e3f3d383f34022421213e232511373423327f363e27"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="e0a6a5b2a3af8e8c898e85b39590908f9294a086859283ce878f96">[email protected]</span></a> or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, 
call (202) 502-8659.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on February 22, 2011.

    Dated: February 9, 2011.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011-3457 Filed 2-15-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### §§ 457.104-457.109 [Reserved]
#### § 1000.350 What is the purpose of this subpart?

This subpart describes how the trust responsibility of the United States is legally maintained through a system of trust evaluations when Tribes/Consortia perform trust functions through AFAs under the Tribal Self-Governance Act of 1994. It describes the principles and processes upon which trust evaluations will be based.
§ 101.9 Preservation of historical and archeological data. ( a ) On United States direct loans from the revolving loan fund and modifications thereof to provide additional loan funds which will involve excavations, road or street construction, land development or disturbance of land on known or reported historical or archeological sites, the Commissioner will take or require appropriate action to assure compliance with the applicable provisions of the Act of June 27, 1960 (74 Stat. 220; (16 U.S.C. 469)), as amended by the Act of May 24, 1974 (Pub. L. 93-291, 88 Stat. 174).
( b ) On loans made by relending organizations conducting a relending program using revolving loan funds, the body authorized to act on loan applications and modifications thereof will, at the time of taking action on a loan or request for modification, inform the applicant of the applicability of this Act to the loan and advise the Commissioner of compliance or the need to obtain compliance.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 12**  **- 6344** 

JULIAN FORD, JR. , Petitioner

- Appellant ,
v. CECILIA REYNOLDS, Warden , Respondent

- Appellee
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Columbia
. David C. Norton , District Judge. ( 3:11

- cv - 00067

- DCN )

Submitted : April 26 , 2012 Decided: May 1, 2012

Before GREGORY, AGEE, and WYNN , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
.
Julian Ford, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Julian Ford, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court ’ s order denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion for reconsideration of the district court ’ s o rder denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (A) (2006) ; Reid v. Angelone , 369 F. 3d 363, 369 (4th Cir. 2004).
A ce rtificate of appealability will not issue absent “ a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. ” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006)
. When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies re lief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Ford has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We3 dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 7 (Tuesday, January 11, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 1660]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-361]



[[Page 1660]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 7290]


Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``Reconfiguring an African Icon: Odes to the Mask by 
Modern and Contemporary Artists From Three Continents''

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, and Delegation of Authority No. 
236-3 of August 28, 2000, I hereby determine that the objects to be 
included in the exhibition ``Reconfiguring an African Icon: Odes to the 
Mask by Modern and Contemporary Artists from Three Continents,'' 
imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within the United States, 
are of cultural significance. The objects are imported pursuant to a 
loan agreement with the foreign owner or custodian. I also determine 
that the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at the 
Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York, NY, from on or about March 8, 
2011, until on or about August 21, 2011, and at possible additional 
exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, is in the national 
interest. Public Notice of these Determinations is ordered to be 
published in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the exhibit objects, contact Carol B. Epstein, Attorney-
Adviser, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State 
(telephone: 202/632-6473). The address is U.S. Department of State, SA-
5, L/PD, Fifth Floor, Washington, DC 20522-0505.

    Dated: January 4, 2011.
Ann Stock,
Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, 
Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2011-361 Filed 1-10-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
#### Jennie C. Danby, as Administratrix, etc., of Walter J. Danby, Deceased, Appellant, v. New York City Railway Company, Respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. No opinion.
#### State of Nebraska, appellee, v. Vastine Leon Erving, also known as Sam Sausage, appellant.

228 N. W. 2d 619

Filed May 1, 1975.

No. 39837.

T. Clement Gaughan and Richard L. Goos, for appellant.

Paul L. Douglas, Attorney General, and Melvin K. Kammerlohr, for appellee.

Heard before White, C. J., . Spencer, Boslaugh, McCown, Newton, Clinton, and Brodkey, JJ.

Brodkey, J.

On February 3, 1974, the defendant, who was incarcerated and serving a sentence in the Nebraska Penal and Correctional Complex, pushed corrections officer, Lieutenant William J. Ruhge, who was about to take him to solitary confinement as a result of institutional infractions, and also struck the officer in the eye with *668a fingernail clipper while defendant was resisting Lieutenant Ruhge and other officers. He had previously thrown two cups of water on a guard after being refused a cigarette. Defendant was originally charged with the commission of a felony, but the information was later amended to charge defendant with an unlawful assault on William J. Ruhge, which' is a misdemean- or. He was later sentenced to 30 days in the county-city jail in Lancaster County, Nebraska, the sentence to be consecutive to any term or terms then being served by the defendant. He has appealed to this court assigning as error the failure of the court to make the sentence run concurrently with the time being served by the defendant, and also alleging that the sentence was excessive. We affirm.

The statutory penalty for the misdemeanor offense of assault is a fine not exceeding $500 or imprisonment in the jail of the county not exceeding 6 months. § 28-41,1, R. S. Supp., 1974. The sentence imposed was clearly not excessive. However, defendant urges this court to reduce the sentence of the trial court under section 29-2308, R- R. S. 1943, and asserts that it is the duty of the court to do so if warranted by the evidence. The evidence does not so warrant, and we decline to do so. Were we to modify the 30-day sentence and make it run concurrently rather than consecutively with defendant’s present sénteñce, it would be tantamount to defendant receiving no sentence at all. We have repeatedly ruled that we will not disturb a sentence imposed within the limits of the statute unless there appears to be an abuse of discretion. State v. Cano, 191 Neb. 709, 217 N. W. 2d 480 (1974). There was no abuse of discretion in this case. Judgment affirmed.

Affirmed.
§ 15.305 What must I include with my claim? ( a ) You must include an itemized statement of the claim, including copies of any supporting documents such as signed notes, account records, billing records, and journal entries. The itemized statement must also include: ( 1 ) The date and amount of the original debt;
( 2 ) The dates, amounts, and identity of the payor for any payments made;
( 3 ) The dates, amounts, product or service, and identity of any person making charges on the account;
( 4 ) The balance remaining on the debt on the date of the decedent's death; and
( 5 ) Any evidence that the decedent disputed the amount of the claim.
( b ) You must submit an affidavit that verifies the balance due and states whether: ( 1 ) Parties other than the decedent are responsible for any portion of the debt alleged;
( 2 ) Any known or claimed offsets to the alleged debt exist;
( 3 ) The creditor or anyone on behalf of the creditor has filed a claim or sought reimbursement against the decedent's non-trust or non-restricted property in any other judicial or quasi-judicial proceeding, and the status of such action; and
( 4 ) The creditor or anyone on behalf of the creditor has filed a claim or sought reimbursement against the decedent's trust or restricted property in any other judicial or quasi-judicial proceeding, and the status of such action.
( c ) A secured creditor must first exhaust the security before a claim against trust personalty for any deficiency will be allowed. You must submit a verified or certified copy of any judgment or other documents that establish the amount of the deficiency after exhaustion of the security.
EXHIBIT 13.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report on Form 20-F of GasLog Ltd., a corporation organized under the laws of Bermuda (the Company), for the period ending December 31, 2014, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned officer of
  the Company certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|
|
|
|
|

The foregoing certification is provided solely for purposes of complying with the provisions of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not intended to be used or relied upon for any other purpose.

|    |  |                               
|--- |  | ------------------------------
|    |  | Date: March 25, 2015          
|By: |  | /s/ Simon Crowe               
|    |  |                               
|    |  | Name: Simon Crowe             
|    |  | Title: Chief Financial Officer



---
(logo)Rialto

CAPITAL

 

 

**2018 Annual Statement of Servicer Compliance (Item1123)**

 

 

Poolingand Servicing Agreement (the "Pooling and Servicing Agreement") datedas of February 1, 2012 by and among GS Mortgage Securities Corporation II, asDepositor, KeyCorp Real Estate Capital Markets, Inc. as Master Servicer, RialtoCapital Advisors, LLC as successor Special Servicer to CWCapital AssetManagement LLC, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association as Trustee, TriMont RealEstate Advisors, Inc., as Operating Advisor relating to the GS MortgageSecurities Trust 2012-GC6, Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates,Series 2012-GC6 **(GSMS 2012-GC6)**

 

Theundersigned, a duly authorized officer of Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, asspecial servicer (the “Special Servicer”) herein certifies to the following:

 

1.     All servicing activities andperformance of such servicing activities under the Pooling and ServicingAgreement are performed on behalf of the Special Servicer.

 

2.     A review of the servicing activitiesand performance by the Special Servicer for the period of January 1, 2018 toDecember 31, 2018 (the “Reporting Period”) in accordance with the Pooling andServicing Agreement has been conducted under my supervision.

 

3.     To the best of my knowledge, based onsuch review, the Special Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations underthe terms of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, in all material respects forthe Reporting Period and if there has been a failure to fulfill any suchobligations in any material respect, each failure and the nature and statusthereof has been specifically identified herein.

 

 

Certifiedby: /s/ Adam Singer

AdamSinger, Managing Director 

 

Date:March 1, 2019
#### Joseph N. Carpenter and Others, Appellants, v. Josephine Klein, Respondent.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion.
# **EXHIBIT 31.1**

## **CERTIFICATION**

I, A. Bruce Neil, President & Chief ExecutiveOfficer, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Qof The Doe Run Resources Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not containany untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements,and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrantand have:

(a)          Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)         Evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

(c)          Disclosed in this reportany change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and Ihave disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofthe registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

(a)       All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)         Any fraud, whether or notmaterial, that involves management or other employees who have a significantrole in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

Date: September 14, 2006

 
| By: |  /s/ A. Bruce  Neil |   |
|-----|--------------------------|--------|

A. Bruce Neil

President & Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)

----