alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2013314EN.01000201.xml

| 29.10.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 314/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.10.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 314/2

---

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the TFEU

Cases where the Commission raises no objections

(Text with EEA relevance)

2013/C 314/02

| Date of adoption of the decision | 6.9.2013 |
| --- | --- |
| Reference number of State Aid | SA.37315 (13/N) |
| Member State | Slovenia |
| Region | — | — |
| Title (and/or name of the beneficiary) | Rescue aid in favour of Factor Banka |
| Legal basis | Act Determing the Measures of the Republic of Slovenia to Strengthen Bank Stability
  Banking act |
| Type of measure | Individual aid | Factor banka |
| Objective | Remedy for a serious disturbance in the economy |
| Form of aid | Guarantee |
| Budget | Overall budget: EUR 540 million |
| Intensity | 100 % |
| Duration (period) | From 6.9.2013 |
| Economic sectors | Financial and insurance activities |
| Name and address of the granting authority | Ministry of Finance |
| Župančičeva 3 |
| SI-1000 Ljubljana |
| SLOVENIJA |

Date of adoption of the decision

6.9.2013

Reference number of State Aid

SA.37315 (13/N)

Member State

Slovenia

Region

—

—

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

Rescue aid in favour of Factor Banka

Legal basis

Act Determing the Measures of the Republic of Slovenia to Strengthen Bank Stability

Banking act

Type of measure

Individual aid

Factor banka

Objective

Remedy for a serious disturbance in the economy

Form of aid

Guarantee

Budget

Overall budget: EUR 540 million

Intensity

100 %

Duration (period)

From 6.9.2013

Economic sectors

Financial and insurance activities

Name and address of the granting authority

Ministry of Finance

Župančičeva 3

SI-1000 Ljubljana

SLOVENIJA

Other information

—

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

http://ec.europa.eu/competition/elojade/isef/index.cfm

---
RIDGEWOOD ELECTRIC POWER TRUST V
                                Exhibit 32.1
                                ------------
                          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                           18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                           AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Robert Swanson,  Chief Executive Officer of Ridgewood Electric Power Trust V.
(the "Registrant"),certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Registrant for the period ended
September 30, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.78m or
78o(d)); and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: January 19, 2004

                                       Signature:

                                       /s/ Robert Swanson
                                       -----------------------
                                       Robert Swanson
                                       Chief Executive Officer
#### Knickerbocker Trust Company, Respondent, v. Mark Packard, Appellant.

Judgment and order affirmed;, with costs. Ail concurred.
#### § 1000.24 When does OSG accept applications to become a member of the applicant pool?

OSG accepts applications to become a member of the applicant pool at any time.
EXHIBIT 32.1

Statement of Chief Executive Officer under 18 U.S.C. § 1350

I, Mark E. Palomba, the chief executive officer of
Critical Path, Inc. (the Company), certify for the purposes of section 1350 of chapter 63 of title 18 of the United States Code that, to the best of my knowledge,



| | (i) | the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2007 (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | ---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                   
|-------------------
|/s/ Mark E. Palomba
|Mark E. Palomba    

August 14, 2007

A signed original of this written statement required by 18 U.S.C. § 1350 has been provided to Critical Path, Inc. and will be retained by Critical Path, Inc. and furnished to the United States Securities Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
Brian C Malone 9290 Jerry Acres Lane Jacksonville, FL 32220
904-509-8914 gmhorse@gmail.com

Dear Sir or Madam:

This petition is being submitted on my behalf without legal counsel or consulting

services.

Pursuant to Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (the Reform Act), and 14 C.F.R. Part 11, Brian C. Malone, a freelance multimedia producer, hereby applies for an exemption from the Federal Aviation Regulations (FARs) listed below to allow operation of our Small Unmanned Aircraft System (sUAS) commercially in airspace regulated by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) so long as such operations are conducted with and under the conditions outlined herein or as may be established by the FAA as required by Section 333.

The requested exemption would permit Brian C. Malone to pursue his commercial interests in providing services to clients using a small advanced sUAV in the following areas: Real Estate, Marketing, Land Management/Surveying, Agricultural Surveying, Special Events, Cinematography, Photography, and Search/Rescue. Brian Malone states that all sUAS flights will occur over private or controlled access property and will do so with the property owner's consent and knowledge and that only people who have consented or otherwise have agreed to be within the UAS’ radius during filming and photography applications.

Brian Malone has demonstrated the ability to safely and effectively fly the sUAS DJI Inspire 1 and DJI Phantom which will be used for all commercial and private purposes. Brian Malone complies with local ordinances and laws regarding the operation of sUAS,

and adheres to all weather and environmental restrictions or limitations in reference to the operations of sUAS.

All flights will occur in ordinance with any state or local laws regarding privacy.

I, Brian C. Malone, am seeking the exemption because I am committed to complying with all of the rules, guidelines, limitations, and future legislation set forth by the FAA. I agree to operate the sUAS in the manner that I have described, and for the purposes that I have described. Without the exemption request granted, I would be unable to safely and effectively run my business, and it is my intention to comply with the FAA and obtain an exemption of the following regulations.The following contains my list of regulations from which I am seeking exemption, and a complete list of responsibilities I assume as operator; it also contains information regarding the aircraft, public benefit and safety features, and similar petitions requests granted.

Regulations from which exemption is requested:

14 C.F.R. Part 21 14 C.F.R. 45.23(b) 14 C.F.R. 61.113(a) & (b) 14 C.F.R. 91.7(a) 14 C.F.R. 91.9(b) (2)

14 C.F.R. 91.109

14 C.F.R. 91.119

14 C.F.R. 91.121
----

|                          |
|--------------------------|
|                          |  |
| 001-10315                | 63-0860407 |
| (Commission File Number) | (IRS Employer Identification No.) |
|                     |   |

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |
| ¨ | Written communication pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425) |
|   |   |
| ¨ | Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12) |
|   |   |
| ¨ | Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b)) |
|   |   |
| ¨ | Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c)) |

----

----

----

----

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |  |  |
| (a)    |   | Financial Statements of Business Acquired |
|   |   |   |   |
|   |   | The financial statements required by Item 9.01(a) of Form 8-K will be filed by amendment to this Current Report on Form 8-K within 71 days after the date upon which this Current Report on Form 8-K is required to be filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission. |
|   |   |   |   |
| (b)    |   | Pro Forma Financial Information |
|   |   |   |   |
|   |   | The unaudited pro forma combined consolidated financial information required by Item 9.01(b) of Form 8‑K will be filed by amendment to this Current Report on Form 8-K within 71 days after the date upon which this Current Report on Form 8-K is required to be filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission. |
|   |   |   |   |
| (d)    |   | Exhibits |   |
|   |   |
|   |   | 99.1 | Press Release of HealthSouth Corporation, dated October 1, 2015. |

----

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |  |
|   |   |   |
| By:    | /S/   JOHN P. WHITTINGTON |
|   | Name: | John P. Whittington |
|   | Title: | Executive Vice President, General Counseland Corporate Secretary |
IV

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 157

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives in support of America’s

teachers.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 4, 1999

Ms. GRANGER (for herself, Mr. PITTS, Mr. WATTS of Oklahoma, Mr.

DEMINT, Mr. TANCREDO, Mr. FLETCHER, Mr. METCALF, Mr.

HAYWORTH, Mr. RAMSTAD, Mr. BARRETT of Nebraska, Mr. SESSIONS,

Mr. NEAL of Massachusetts, Ms. HOOLEY of Oregon, Mr. ETHERIDGE,

Mr. GALLEGLY, Mr. MOORE, Mrs. NORTHUP, Mr. FORBES, Mr. SMITH

of Washington, Mrs. FOWLER, Mr. BACHUS, Mr. TRAFICANT, Mr.

CHAMBLISS, Mr. MCINTOSH, Mr. GRAHAM, Mr. CUNNINGHAM, Mr. KILDEE, Mr. MCKEON, Mr. PHELPS, Mr. SCHAFFER, Mr. KLINK, Mr.

LATOURETTE, Mr. TOOMEY, Mr. SMITH of Michigan, Mr. CALVERT, Mr.

FOLEY, Mr. REYNOLDS, Mr. HORN, Mr. FROST, Mr. UDALL of New Mexico, Mr. BLUNT, and Mrs. CHRISTENSEN) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Education and the Workforce

MAY 4, 1999

Committee on Education and the Workforce discharged; considered under

suspension of the rules and agreed to

RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives in

support of America’s teachers.

Whereas the foundation of American freedom and democracy

is a strong, effective system of education in which every

child can learn in a safe and nurturing environment;
2

•HRES 157 IH

Whereas a first-rate education system depends on a partnership between parents, principals, teachers, and children;

Whereas much of the success of our Nation during the American Century is the result of the hard work and dedication of teachers across the land;

Whereas, in addition to their families, knowledgeable and

skillful teachers can have a profound impact on a child’s

early development and future success;

Whereas, while many people spend their lives building careers, teachers spend their careers building lives;

Whereas our Nation’s teachers serve our children beyond the

call of duty as coaches, mentors, and advisors without regard to fame or fortune; and

Whereas across this land nearly 3 million men and women experience the joys of teaching young minds the virtues of

reading, writing, and arithmetic: Now, therefore, be it

Resolved, That the House of Representatives—

(1) honors and recognizes the unique and important

achievements of America’s teachers; and

(2) urges all Americans to take a moment to thank

and pay tribute to our Nation’s teachers.

Æ
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Stephen Parent, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of General Metals Corporation for the period ended July 31, 2008 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of General Metals Corporation.



|                           |                            |                                                                                   
|-------------------------- | -------------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: September  12, 2008 | General Metals Corporation
|                           |                            |                                                                                   
|                           |                            |                                                                                   
|                           | By:                        | /s/ STEPHENPARENT                                                                 
|                           |                            | Stephen Parent
Chief Executive Officer and President
(Principal Executive Officer)
|                           |                           





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to General Metals Corporation and will be retained by General Metals Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 13-3206

___________________________

United States of America

lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee

v.

Princeton C. Baker

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant

____________

 Appeal from United States District Court 

for the Southern District of Iowa - Council Bluffs

____________

 Submitted: March 24, 2014

 Filed: March 27, 2014

[Unpublished]

____________

Before BYE, GRUENDER, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.

____________

PER CURIAM.

Princeton Baker directly appeals the sentence that the district court imposed

1

after Baker pleaded guilty to escaping from federal custody. His counsel has moved

The Honorable James E. Gritzner, Chief Judge, United States District Court

1

for the Southern District of Iowa.
to withdraw and has filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967),

arguing that the sentence is substantively unreasonable because it was imposed

consecutively to an undischarged state sentence.

We conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion. See United

States v. Feemster, 572 F.3d 455, 461 (8th Cir. 2009) (en banc) (appellate review of

sentencing decision). The court determined the advisory Guidelines range; heard the

parties’ arguments for and against varying from U.S.S.G. § 5G1.3(b), which

recommended concurrent sentencing; discussed the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors; and

carefully explained the decision to run the federal sentence consecutively to the state

sentence in the particular circumstances of Baker’s case. See 18 U.S.C. § 3584(b)

(directing court to consider § 3553(a) factors in determining whether sentence should

run consecutively to or concurrently with another sentence); United States v. Carter,

652 F.3d 894, 896-97 (8th Cir. 2011) (affirming sentence where court determined

variance from Guidelines was appropriate in light of § 3553(a) factors). In addition,

we have independently reviewed the record in accordance with Penson v. Ohio, 488

U.S. 75, 80 (1988), and have found no nonfrivolous issues. Accordingly, we affirm.

As for counsel’s motion to withdraw, we conclude that allowing counsel to

withdraw at this time would not be consistent with the Eighth Circuit’s 1994

Amendment to Part V of the Plan to Implement The Criminal Justice Act of 1964. 

We therefore deny counsel’s motion to withdraw as premature, without prejudice to

counsel refiling the motion upon fulfilling the duties set forth in the Amendment.

______________________________

-2-
### §1372. Grade on retirement for physical disability: members of armed forces

Unless entitled to a higher retired grade under some other provision of law, any member of an armed force who is retired for physical disability under section 1201 or 1204 of this title, or whose name is placed on the temporary disability retired list under section 1202 or 1205 of this title, is entitled to the grade equivalent to the highest of the following:

(1) The grade or rank in which he is serving on the date when his name is placed on the temporary disability retired list or, if his name was not carried on that list, on the date when he is retired.

(2) The highest temporary grade or rank in which he served satisfactorily, as determined by the Secretary of the armed force from which he is retired.

(3) The permanent regular or reserve grade to which he would have been promoted had it not been for the physical disability for which he is retired and which was found to exist as a result of a physical examination.

(4) The temporary grade to which he would have been promoted had it not been for the physical disability for which he is retired, if eligibility for that promotion was required to be based on cumulative years of service or years of service in grade and the disability was discovered as a result of a physical examination.

(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 105; Pub. L. 104–201, div. A, title V, §577, Sept. 23, 1996, 110 Stat. 2536.)

| Revised section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1372 | 37:272(d) (104th through 128th words, as applicable to retired grade; and 2d and 5th provisos).37:279 (less applicability to 37:272(d) (last proviso)). | Oct. 12, 1949, ch. 681, §§402(d) (104th through 128th words, as applicable to retired grade; and 2d and 5th provisos), 409 (less applicability to §402(d) (last proviso)), 63 Stat. 818, 823. |

37:279 (less applicability to 37:272(d) (last proviso)).

Clause (1) is substituted for 37:272(d) (104th through 128th words, as applicable to retired grade). The words "if his name was not carried on that list" are substituted for the words "whichever is earlier".

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1996—Pars. (3), (4). Pub. L. 104–201 substituted "a physical examination" for "his physical examination for promotion".
### §1171. Regular enlisted members: early discharge

Under regulations prescribed by the Secretary concerned and approved by the President, any regular enlisted member of an armed force may be discharged within one year before the expiration of the term of his enlistment or extended enlistment. A discharge under this section does not affect any right, privilege, or benefit that a member would have had if he completed his enlistment or extended enlistment, except that the member is not entitled to pay and allowances for the period not served.

(Added Pub. L. 90–235, §3(a)(1)(A), Jan. 2, 1968, 81 Stat. 757; amended Pub. L. 112–81, div. A, title V, §525, Dec. 31, 2011, 125 Stat. 1401.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2011—Pub. L. 112–81 substituted "within one year" for "within three months".

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Ex. Ord. No. 11498. Delegation of Authority to Secretary of Defense

Ex. Ord. No. 11498, Dec. 1, 1969, 34 F.R. 19125, provided:

By virtue of the authority vested in me by section 301 of title 3 of the United States Code, and as President of the United States, it is ordered that the Secretary of Defense is hereby designated and empowered to approve regulations issued by the Secretaries concerned under section 1171 of title 10, United States Code, effective January 2, 1968, which relate to the early discharge of regular enlisted members of the armed forces.

Richard Nixon.
### Landslides along the Columbia River valley, northeastern Washington, with a section on seismic surveys

By: Fred O. JonesDaniel R. EmbodyWarren Lee PetersonR. M. Hazlewood

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/pp367

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 3**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 4**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 5**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 6**                            (pdf) 
- NGMDB Index Page:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**                            (html)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

No abstract available.

#### Study Area

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
EXHIBIT 32.2

Statement of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Knight
Capital Group, Inc. (the Company) for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Steven Bisgay, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or, 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/S/    STEVEN BISGAYName: Steven Bisgay Title:    Chief
Financial Officer Date:   November 6, 2009


This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.