alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
H. Res. 100

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

March 10, 1999.

Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule

XVIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee of the

Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of

the bill (H.R. 800) to provide for education flexibility partnerships. The first reading of the bill shall be dispensed with.

Points of order against consideration of the bill for failure to

comply with clause 4(a) of rule XIII are waived. General debate shall be confined to the bill and shall not exceed one

hour equally divided and controlled by the chairman and

ranking minority member of the Committee on Education

and the Workforce. After general debate the bill shall be considered for amendment under the five-minute rule for a period not to exceed 5 hours. It shall be in order to consider

as an original bill for the purpose of amendment under the

five-minute rule the amendment in the nature of a substitute

recommended by the Committee on Education and the Workforce now printed in the bill. The committee amendment in
2

•HRES 100 EH

the nature of a substitute shall be considered as read. No

amendment to the committee amendment in the nature of a

substitute shall be in order except those printed in the portion of the Congressional Record designated for that purpose

in clause 8 of rule XVIII and except pro forma amendments

for the purpose of debate. Each amendment printed in the

Record may be offered only by the Member who caused it to

be printed or his designee and shall be considered as read.

The Chairman of the Committee of the Whole may: (1) postpone until a time during further consideration in the Committee of the Whole a request for a recorded vote on any

amendment; and (2) reduce to five minutes the minimum

time for electronic voting on any postponed question that follows another electronic vote without intervening business,

provided that the minimum time for electronic voting on the

first in any series of questions shall be 15 minutes. At the

conclusion of consideration of the bill for amendment the

Committee shall rise and report the bill to the House with

such amendments as may have been adopted. Any Member

may demand a separate vote in the House on any amendment

adopted in the Committee of the Whole to the bill or to the

committee amendment in the nature of a substitute. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill and

amendments thereto to final passage without intervening mo-
3

•HRES 100 EH

tion except one motion to recommit with or without instructions.

Attest:

Clerk.
Document

Exhibit 10.3


Sabine Pass Liquefaction, LLC


November 3, 2021


Cheniere Marketing International LLP
3rd Floor, The Zig Zag Building
70 Victoria Street
London SW1E 6SQ, United Kingdom
Attn: Commercial Operations


Re:       Letter Agreement regarding the Base SPA (“Letter Agreement”)


Dear Sir or Madam:


The Parties have entered into that certain Amended and Restated LNG Sale and Purchase Agreement (FOB) dated August 5, 2014 between Sabine Pass Liquefaction, LLC and Cheniere Marketing International LLP (as assignee of Cheniere Marketing, LLC) (as amended and assigned, the “Base SPA”).  Capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the meanings given them in the Base SPA.  This Letter Agreement sets forth the terms of certain sales and purchases of LNG under the Base SPA.


The Parties hereby agree that, notwithstanding Section 9.2 and subject to Section 14 of the Base SPA, the FPC (expressed in USD per MMBtu) applicable to up to thirty-five (35) cargoes scheduled for delivery in Contract Year 2022 shall equal USD one decimal nine two per MMBtu (US$1.92/MMBtu).


Please indicate Buyer’s agreement with the terms of this Letter Agreement by executing a copy of this Letter Agreement where indicated below and returning it to Seller. 


Sincerely,


Sabine Pass Liquefaction, LLC


						
	By:	/s/ Zach Davis
		Zach Davis
		Chief Financial Officer






Accepted and Agreed:
												
	Cheniere Marketing International LLP	
	acting by its managing member, Cheniere Marketing, LLC
				
	By:	/s/ Anatol Feygin	
		Anatol Feygin		
		Executive Vice President and Chief Commercial Officer


700 Milam Street, Suite 1900, Houston, Texas 77002
+1 713-375-5000
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

        In connection with the Quarterly Report of Cosine Communications, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2002
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Terry Gibson, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

        (1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
                of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
                material respects, the financial condition and results of
                operations of the Company.

/s/  Terry Gibson
------------------------------------------------------
Terry Gibson
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
November 14, 2002
Exhibit 33.6

 

 

[LETTERHEAD OF NATIONAL TAX SEARCH, LLC.]

 

 

 

REPORT ON ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE SECURITIESAND EXCHANGE COMMISSION'S REGULATION AB SERVICING CRITERIA

 

 

For the calendar year ending December31, 2011, National Tax Search, LLC has been a Tax Service Vendor for **Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.** (the “Servicer”).

 

National Tax Search, LLC (“NTS”)is responsible for assessing compliance as of December 31, 2011 and for the period from January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2011(the “Reporting Period”) with the servicing criteria set forth in Title 17, Section 229.1122(d) of the Code of FederalRegulations (the “CFR”). NTS has used the servicing criteria communicated to NTS by the Servicer to assess compliancewith the applicable servicing criteria. Only servicing criteria 1122 (d) (l)(ii), 1122 (d)1(iv), 1122 (d)2(ii), 1122 (d)2(v), 1122(d)2(vi),1122 (d)2(vii), 1122(d)(4)(xi), and 1122(d)(4)(xii) (the “Applicable Servicing Criteria”) are applicable to the activitiesNTS performs with respect to the transactions covered by this report. NTS has determined that the remaining servicing criteriaset forth in Item 1122 (d) of the SEC Regulation AB are not applicable to the activities it performs with respect to the transactionscovered by this report. The transactions covered by this report include all tax payments made on behalf of the Servicer using NTS'sTaxQ system (the “Platform Transactions”).

 

NTS, as a vendor, has assessed its compliancewith the Applicable Servicing Criteria for the Reporting Period and has concluded that the NTS has complied, in all material respects,with the Applicable Servicing Criteria as of December 31 , 2011 and for the Reporting Period with respect to the Platform Transactionstaken as a whole.

 

Plante & Moran, PLLC, an independentregistered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report on the assessment of compliance with the Applicable ServicingCriteria as of December 31, 2011 and for the Reporting Period as set forth in this assertion.

 

National Tax Search, LLC, as Vendor to Servicer

 

 

 

/s/ Lori D. Eshoo

 

Lori D. Eshoo, President/CEO

January 16, 2012

 

 

303 E. Wacker Drive, Suite 1040

Chicago, IL 60601

Telephone: (312) 233-6440

Facsimile: (312) 540-3770

[WBENC LOGO]
ySjt/Q-ot, ,o?-

POISON D8SWSSSED -

/% I^fe^

^^^^MSm^^rmfH^i^^-

Abel Acosta, Clerk 1^S!n^^^Stt^wfa^?X57^^
'^^iA&w^

1*7, f/c*0

^^Avyethafar (m^/vfflJU &mte, v<&4.

if'h&oaaLjJwtsf''fifAiffe (mfailltf*l&OJ*'£..-.
.&WL

WTa^jmJ 3fiJ- flfc</ /&*dj&jM/££?Smt//kJ

Ik orJ_k-im J^^d/U&n#*l&wfy

r '""^I3VS3-1 CJ&l

/°M<£

&°fe$&
EXHIBIT
23.1



CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM







We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement Number 333-190697 on Form S-8 of Processa Pharmaceuticals,
Inc. of our report, dated April 16, 2018, relating to our audits of the consolidated financial statements as of and for the years
ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Processa Pharmaceuticals, Inc.



|                                                          | 
|--------------------------------------------------------- | 
|                                                          | 
|Owings
                                         Mills, MD | 
|April
    16, 2018                                        |
#### § 1000.144 Can a Tribe reallocate funds for a non-BIA non-Indian program?

Yes, section 403(b) permits such reallocation upon joint agreement of the Secretary and the Tribe/Consortium.
-       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2023-02-15T01:53:21-0500
      - Government Publishing Office, Washington, DC 20401
      - Government Publishing Office
      - Government Publishing Office attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by Government Publishing Office
§ 51.1 Policy. ( a ) Section 552(a) of title 5, United States Code, provides, in part, that “matter reasonably available to the class of persons affected thereby is deemed published in the Federal Register when incorporated by reference therein with the approval of the Director of the Federal Register.”
( b ) The Director will interpret and apply the language of section 552(a) together with other requirements which govern publication in the Federal Register and the Code of Federal Regulations. Those requirements which govern publication include— ( 1 ) The Federal Register Act (44 U.S.C. 1501 *et seq.*)
( 2 ) The Administrative Procedure Act (5 U.S.C. 551 *et seq.*);
( 3 ) The regulations of the Administrative Committee of the Federal Register under the Federal Register Act (1 CFR Ch. I); and
( 4 ) The acts which require publication in the Federal Register (See CFR volume entitled “CFR Index and Finding Aids.”)
( c ) The Director will assume in carrying out the responsibilities for incorporation by reference that incorporation by reference— ( 1 ) Is intended to benefit both the Federal Government and the members of the class affected; and
( 2 ) Is not intended to detract from the legal or practical attributes of the system established by the Federal Register Act, the Administrative Procedure Act, the regulations of the Administrative Committee of the Federal Register, and the acts which require publication in the Federal Register.
( d ) The Director will carry out the responsibilities by applying the standards of part 51 fairly and uniformly.
( e ) Publication in the Federal Register of a document containing an incorporation by reference does not of itself constitute an approval of the incorporation by reference by the Director.
( f ) Incorporation by reference of a publication is limited to the edition of the publication that is approved. Future amendments or revisions of the publication are not included.
#### § 1000.80 What is the purpose of this subpart?

This subpart describes the components of annual funding agreements for BIA programs.
#### Barnett Schnitzer, Respondent, v. Joseph Price, Appellant.

Motion denied) without costs) Present—Woodward, Jenks, Hooker, Gaynor and-Miller, J J.
§ 162.470 When will a cancellation of a business lease be effective? ( a ) A cancellation involving a business lease will not be effective until 31 days after the lessee receives a cancellation letter from us, or 41 days from the date we mailed the letter, whichever is earlier.
( b ) The cancellation decision will not be effective if an appeal is filed unless the cancellation is made immediately effective under part 2 of this chapter. While a cancellation decision is ineffective, the lessee must continue to pay compensation and comply with the other terms of the lease.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 927 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 927

   To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the annual 
                exclusion from the gift tax to $20,000.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 2, 1999

  Mr. McInnis (for himself, Mr. Houghton, Ms. Dunn, Mr. English, Mr. 
Hayworth, Mr. Lewis of Kentucky, Mr. Watkins, Mr. Foley, Mr. Tancredo, 
and Mr. Shows) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the annual 
                exclusion from the gift tax to $20,000.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Family Savings Rescue Act of 1999''.

SEC. 2. ANNUAL GIFT TAX EXCLUSION INCREASED TO $20,000.

    (a) In General.--Subsection (b) of section 2503 of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to exclusions from gifts) is amended by 
striking ``$10,000'' each place it appears and inserting ``$20,000''.
    (b) Conforming Amendment.--Paragraph (2) of section 2503(b) of such 
Code is amended--
            (1) by striking ``after 1998'' and inserting ``after 
        2000'', and
            (2) by striking ``calendar year 1997'' and inserting 
        ``calendar year 1999''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to transfers made after December 31, 1999.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 601.18 Requirement for and timing of an Environmental Impact Statement.

Prior to the Commission's approval of a major Federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment, the Executive Director shall prepare an EIS for a Non-Federal Agency application.
#### Salvatore Romano, Respondent, v. The Concordia Fire Insurance Company, Appellant.

Motion granted, without costs. Present—Woodward, Jenks, Gaynor, Rich and Miller, JJ.
Planning and Technical Support DivisionAir Resources Board

California Environmental Protection Agency

P.O. Box 2815

Sacramento, CA 95812

Dear Ms. Magliano:

Thank you for your timely submission of the 2009 Annual Monitoring Network Report

for Small Districts in California. We have reviewed the submitted document and have found that

it meets the minimum requirements set forth under 40 CFR Part 58.10. While this letter serves

as official approval ofthe annual network plan, it does not constitute approval of the system

modifications that are proposed in the plan for the future. We will continue to work with the

districts represented in the plan to review proposed system changes.

O If you have any questions regarding this letter, please feel free to contact me at (415) 972-3261 or Meredith Kurpius at (415) 947-4534.

/

4——

-•—4esepLpka, Acting Manager

Air Divisfoii

Air Quality Analysis Office

cc: Ken Stroud, CARE

Merrin Wright, CARB -- Pheng Lee, CARE

Meredith Kurpius

Printed on Reyc1ed Paper
#### § 425.1 Purpose and scope.

This part sets forth the President's Commission on White House Fellowships procedures under the Privacy Act of 1974 as required by 5 U.S.C. 552a(f). Information to applicants regarding the implementation of this Act is contained in the White House Fellowships Application Instructions.
#### Edward Walsh, Appellant, v. The New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Company, Respondent.

Judgment affirmed, .with costs. All con- , curred, except Kruse, J., who dissented.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK>     0001061103
<NAME>     Absolute Futue.com
<MULTIPLIER>    1

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                          JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                            SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                       81173
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                                 7425
<ALLOWANCES>                                     0
<INVENTORY>                                      0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             88598
<PP&E>                                       89929
<DEPRECIATION>                              180180
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              234390
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       761252
<BONDS>                                     343500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<COMMON>                                     11100
<OTHER-SE>                                   36000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                234390
<SALES>                                     163257
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            163257
<CGS>                                            0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            666787
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           32080
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (535530)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              0
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                               (535530)
<EPS-BASIC>                                 (.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 (.07)


</TABLE>
### **CHAPTER 939—SEPARATION FOR VARIOUS REASONS**

Sec.
9307.
Aviation cadets: discharge.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior chapter 939, consisting of sections 9621 to 9629, related to sale of serviceable material, prior to renumbering as chapter 969 of this title.

#### Amendments

**2018**—Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, §806(d)(3)(B)(i), (e)(1), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1833, redesignated chapter 861 of this title as this chapter and item 8817 as 9307.

**1994**—Pub. L. 103–337, div. A, title XVI, §1674(b)(7), Oct. 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 3016, struck out items 8819 "Reserve officers: discharge for failure of promotion to first lieutenant" and 8820 "Air National Guard of United States officers: discharge".

**1980**—Pub. L. 96–513, title V, §504(16), Dec. 12, 1980, 94 Stat. 2917, struck out items 8814 "Regular commissioned officers: discharge during three-year probationary period" and 8818 "Regular female members: termination of appointment or enlistment".

**1968**—Pub. L. 90–235, §3(a)(5), (b)(7), Jan. 2, 1968, 81 Stat. 758, struck out items 8811 "Air Force enlisted members: discharge certificate; limitations on discharge", 8812 "Air Force enlisted members: during war or emergency; discharge", 8813 "Air Force enlisted members: dependency discharge", 8815 "Regular enlisted members: resignation of members enlisted on career basis; limitations", and 8816 "Regular enlisted members: minority discharge".

**1958**—Pub. L. 85–861, §1(191)(B), Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1534, added item 8819.
#### Sam Woodrow v. The State.

No. 22813.

Delivered March 29, 1944.

Rehearing Denied May 24, 1944.

*329The opinion states the case.

*D. C. Bennett,*of Orange, and *David E. O’Fiel,*of Beaumont, for appellant.

*Ernest S. Goens,*State’s Attorney, of Austin, for the State.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

Appellant was' convicted of the offense of sodomy and assessed a penalty of seven years in the penitentiary.

A number of issues discussed in appellant’s brief will not be considered because they are raised only by assignments of error. We have repeatedly stated that questions may not be brought to this court in that manner.

The State relies upon a written confession signed by appellant in which, without detailing the facts, he merely says that he had intercourse with a cow. He does not describe the cow but it appears from his statement that his act was with one cow and that he then tried another. Failing in his purpose he stabbed the second cow. All of the State’s evidence relates to the second cow. There is no evidence whatsoever corroborating or tending to corroborate his story about the first cow. He led the officers to his home and showed them a pair of trousers which he said belonged to him. The officers found hair of a cow on the trousers but there, is no indication that it was from *330the particular cow in question. The evidence of a veterinary surgeon and of a medical doctor, both called by the State, is conclusive that some other object than the private organ of a human being had been inserted in the cow and caused her death, thus .refuting in a very positive way, the one fact stated in the confession which was relied upon for the conviction. An extra judicial confession will not support a conviction unless the .corpus delicti is proven in some manner prescribed by law. See Scott v. State, 148 S. W. (2d) 418; Franklin v. State, 144 S. W. (2d) 581; Patterson v. State, 146 S. W. (2d) 995.

The judgment of the trial 'court is reversed and the cause is remanded.

ON STATE’S MOTION FOR REHEARING.

DAVIDSON’ Judge.

Upon the State’s insistence, we have again examined the facts to ascertain if there be evidence, circumstantial or otherwise — outside of, and other than, the appellant’s confession— tending to show that the crime of sodomy was committed, by someone, so as to establish the corpus delicti. We fail to so find. It follows that we remain convinced the corpus delicti has not been shown.

■ The State’s motion for rehearing is overruled. '

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
# C_2013351EN.01002601.xml

| 30.11.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 351/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.11.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 351/26

---

Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries

2013/C 351/05

In accordance with Article 35(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), a decision has been taken to close the fishery as set down in the following table:

1

| Date and time of closure | 15.11.2013 |
| --- | --- |
| Duration | 15.11.2013-31.12.2013 |
| Member State | European Union (All Member States) |
| Stock or group of stocks | COD/N3M |
| Species | Cod (Gadus Morhua) |
| Zone | NAFO 3M |
| Type(s) of fishing vessels | — |
| Reference number | 66/TQ40 |

Date and time of closure

15.11.2013

Duration

15.11.2013-31.12.2013

Member State

European Union (All Member States)

Stock or group of stocks

COD/N3M

Species

Cod (Gadus Morhua)

Gadus Morhua

Zone

NAFO 3M

Type(s) of fishing vessels

—

Reference number

66/TQ40

---

(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.

1

---
§ 21.1 Drafting. ( a ) Each agency that prepares a document that is subject to codification shall draft it as an amendment to the Code of Federal Regulations, in accordance with this subchapter, before submitting it to the Office of the Federal Register.
( b ) Each agency that prepares a document that is subject to codification shall include words of issuance and amendatory language that precisely describes the relationship of the new provisions to the Code.
[37 FR 23611, Nov. 4, 1972, as amended at 54 FR 9682, Mar. 7, 1989]