alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 18 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 18

 Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that any unified 
  budgetary surplus achieved by the end of fiscal year 2003 which is 
 attributable to a surplus in the Social Security trust funds be saved 
             for investment in the Social Security Program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 6, 1999

Mr. Pascrell submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                    the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that any unified 
  budgetary surplus achieved by the end of fiscal year 2003 which is 
 attributable to a surplus in the Social Security trust funds be saved 
             for investment in the Social Security Program.

Whereas the old-age, survivors, and disability insurance program under title II 
        of the Social Security Act has drastically reduced the rate of poverty 
        among seniors, and, if such program did not exist, the rate of poverty 
        among seniors would be 54 percent rather than the current rate of 10.8 
        percent;
Whereas the Board of Trustees of the Federal Old-Age and Survivors Insurance 
        Trust Fund estimates that the Trust Fund will become insolvent by the 
        year 2032;
Whereas the number of people over age 65 will double by the year 2030;
Whereas the number of workers paying into Social Security per beneficiary is 
        expected to drop from 3.3 to 2 by the year 2030;
Whereas the Congressional Budget Office projects that the Treasury would have no 
        unified budget surplus for at least the next 4 years if there were no 
        surplus in the Federal Old-Age and Survivors Insurance Trust Fund and 
        the Federal Disability Insurance Trust Fund; and
Whereas, after a year of bipartisan dialogue on saving Social Security, the 
        House of Representatives has a responsibility now to address the 
        solvency issues facing the old-age, survivors, and disability insurance 
        program under title II of the Social Security Act: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Representatives that 
any amount of unified budget surplus that is achieved by the end of 
fiscal year 2003 which is attributable to surplus in the Federal Old-
Age and Survivors Insurance Trust Fund and the Federal Disability 
Insurance Trust Fund should not be spent, but rather it should be saved 
for investment in the old-age, survivors, and disability insurance 
program under title II of the Social Security Act.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.3


CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES‐OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Keith S. Franz, Chief Financial Officer, in connection with the Annual Report of CĪON Investment Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Annual Report”), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1. The Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2. The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Date: March 9, 2022

















/s/ Keith S. Franz


Keith S. Franz


Chief Financial Officer


(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)


CĪON Investment Corporation
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 19

- 50636 Summary Calendar

DR. LAKSHMI ARUNACHALAM,

Plaintiff

- Appellant

v.

APACHE CORPORATION,

Defendant

- Appellee

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 6:19

- CV

- 352

Before CLEMENT, ELROD, and OLDHAM, Circuit Judges

. PER CURIAM: *

We examine our appellate jurisdiction on our own motion if necessary.

Mejia v. Whitaker , 913 F.3d 482, 487 (5th Cir. 2019). The plaintiff is suing for

patent infringement. The Federal Circuit has exclusive jurisdiction over

appeals in any action arising un der an Act of Congress relating to patents.

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent ex cept under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED
October 10, 2019

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 19-50636 Document: 00515155067 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/10/2019No. 19

- 50636

2 28 U.S.C. § 1295(a)(1). Accordingly, we DISMISS this appeal for lack of

jurisdiction. Case: 19-50636 Document: 00515155067 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/10/2019
#### § 162.026 Who can answer questions about leasing?

An Indian landowner or prospective lessee may contact the local BIA realty office (or of any tribe acting on behalf of BIA under § 162.018) with jurisdiction over the land for answers to questions about the leasing process.
#### § 12.4 Who supervises the Bureau of Indian Affairs uniformed police, detention, and conservation enforcement functions?

The agency superintendent is directly responsible for the operation and management of BIA uniformed police operations, detention facilities, and conservation enforcement operations at any agency having these programs. The agency superintendent must also ensure technical support is provided to any agency contracting the law enforcement and/or detention program.
§ 162.448 How will BIA decide whether to approve an amendment to a business lease? ( a ) We may disapprove a business lease amendment only if at least one of the following is true: ( 1 ) The Indian landowners have not consented and their consent is required;
( 2 ) The lessee's mortgagees or sureties have not consented;
( 3 ) The lessee is in violation of the lease;
( 4 ) The requirements of this subpart have not been met; or
( 5 ) We find a compelling reason to withhold our approval in order to protect the best interests of the Indian landowners.
( b ) We will defer, to the maximum extent possible to the Indian landowners' determination that the amendment is in their best interest.
( c ) We may not unreasonably withhold approval of an amendment.
Home Fire 

Safety Tips For 

Older Adults 

Don’t 

Let Your 

World 

Go Up In

Smoke. 
Prevent home fires.
 

Protect what matters.
 

Older adults are more likely to die in home fires. 

They may move more slowly or have trouble 

hearing a smoke alarm because of hearing loss. 

3 feet

Protect 

Keep heaters at least 3 feet 

away from things that can burn. 

Heaters can cause fires if they 

are too close to furniture, beds, 

curtains, or other materials that 

can burn. Turn space heaters off 

before you leave the home. 

Prepare 

Have working smoke alarms on 

every level of your home. You 

should have a smoke alarm 

inside bedrooms and outside 

sleeping areas. Test to make 

sure the sound of the alarm is 

loud enough to wake you. 

Plan 

Make an escape plan around 

your abilities. If you need to use 

a wheelchair or cane, make sure 

you can get to them quickly. 

Keep glasses or hearing aids 

next to the bed. 

Learn more about fire prevention: www.usfa.fema.gov
No. 9527.

#### Baltimore and Ohio Telegraph Company vs. Louisiana Western Railroad Company.

A suit for the expropriation of property cannot be tried in vacation, but only at a term of ttie court.

A PPEAL from the Fourteenth District Court, Parish of Calcasieu. .LA *Beed,*J.

*J. B. Beokivith*and *G. B. Wells*for Plaintiff and Appellee.

*heavy & heovy*and *J.*P. *Blair, Bayne <& Denigre, D. Caffrey, G. Clark*and *A. J. Kearny*for Defendant and Appellant.

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Todd, J.

From a judgment rendered in an expropriation proceeding, instituted before the judge of the Fourteenth Judicial District, Parish of Calcasieu, the defendant company lias appealed.

Among the exceptions filed in the lower court was one to the effect that the judge could not proceed to try the case in vacation, but that it could only be legally tried in term time.

This exception was overruled.

It seems to us that this ruling was a manifest error. The State courts were established by the Constitution, They were established for the judicial determination of all suits and controversies.

The full and complete organization of the courts and the terms thereof are provided and fixed by law. These terms are thus fixed for the trial of *all*cases and suits instituted before the court. They cannot under the elementary and positive provisions of the law be tried at any other than the regular term of the court, except in special instances expressly declared.

The ease in hand forms no express exception to this general and inflexible rule, and it is so admitted by the opposing counsel, and it is further admitted that no adjudication of any court can be found that would warrant in the slightest degree such an exceptional proceeding. The counsel, however, addresses a strong and forcible argument to the court of the wisdom and apparent necessity of such a proceeding, by reasons of public policy and the paramount importance of a speedy determination of questions involving the exercise of the rights of eminent domain. This argument would doubtless prove irresistible if addressed to the legislative department of the government, but it is a matter in which the courts can afford no relief. They must be controlled by the law as they find it.

It is, therefore, ordered, adjudged aud decreed that the judgment appealed from be annulled, avoided and reversed, and tbe case remanded to be proceeded with according to law.
#### Max Casper and Isaac Cohen, Respondents, v. Harris Goldberg and Hyman Friedman, Appellants, Impleaded with Rachel Friedman, Defendant.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Jenks, Hooker, Gaynor, Rich and Miller, JJ., concurred: _ '
§ 152.31 Cost of conveyance; payment. Pursuant to the Act of February 14, 1920 (41 Stat. 415), as amended by the Act of March 1, 1933 (47 Stat. 1417; 25 U.S.C. 413), the Secretary may in his discretion collect from a purchaser reasonable fees for work performed or expense incurred in the transaction. The amount so collected shall be deposited to the credit of the United States as general fund receipts, except as stated in paragraph (b) of this section. ( a ) ( 1 ) The amount of the fee shall be $22.50 for each transaction.
( 2 ) The fee may be reduced to a lesser amount or may be waived, if the Secretary determines circumstances justify such action.
( b ) ( 1 ) If any or all of the costs of the work performed or expenses incurred are paid with tribal funds, an alternate schedule of fees may be established, subject to approval of the Secretary, and that part of such fees deemed appropriate may be credited to the tribe.
( 2 ) When the purchaser is the tribe which bears all or any part of such costs, the collection of the proportionate share from the tribe may be waived.
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 937

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide a tax credit for

elementary and secondary school teachers.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 2, 1999

Mr. PAUL (for himself, Mr. GREEN of Texas, Mr. RADANOVICH, Mr. DEAL

of Georgia, Mr. STEARNS, and Mr. HINCHEY) introduced the following

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide

a tax credit for elementary and secondary school teachers.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Teacher Tax øCut¿

5 Act of 1999’’.

6 SEC. 2. CREDIT FOR TEACHERS OF ELEMENTARY OR SEC7 ONDARY SCHOOLS.

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subpart A of part IV of sub9 chapter A of chapter 1 of the Internal Revenue Code of

10 1986 (relating to nonrefundable personal credits) is
2

•HR 937 IH

1 amended by inserting after section 25A the following new

2 section:

3 ‘‘SEC. 25B. ELEMENTARY AND SECONDARY SCHOOL TEACH4 ERS.

5 ‘‘(a) ALLOWANCE OF CREDIT.—In the case of an eli6 gible individual, there shall be allowed as a credit against

7 the tax imposed by this chapter for a taxable year an

8 amount equal to $1,000.

9 ‘‘(b) DEFINITIONS

10 ‘‘(1) ELIGIBLE INDIVIDUAL.—

11 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided in

12 subparagraph (B), for purposes of subsection

13 (a), the term ‘eligible individual’ means an indi14 vidual who—

15 ‘‘(i) is a teacher in an elementary or

16 secondary school, and

17 ‘‘(ii) is employed on a full-time basis

18 for an academic year ending during the

19 taxable year.

20 ‘‘(B) EXCLUDED INDIVIDUALS.—Such

21 term does not include an individual who is em22 ployed, on a full-time basis for such academic

23 year, as other staff, as that term is defined in

24 section 14101(20) of the Elementary and Sec-
3

•HR 937 IH

1 ondary Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C.

2 8801(20)).

3 ‘‘(2) ELEMENTARY OR SECONDARY SCHOOL.—

4 The term ‘elementary or secondary school’ means

5 any school which provides elementary education or

6 secondary education (through grade 12), as deter7 mined under State law.’’

8 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections

9 for subpart A of part IV of subchapter A of chapter 1

10 of such Code is amended by inserting after the item relat11 ing to section 25A the following new item:

‘‘Sec. 25B. Elementary and secondary school teachers.’’.

12 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

13 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after

14 December 31, 1998.

Æ
Exhibit 10.2


AMENDMENT TO


EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


 


THIS AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT, dated as
of November 9, 2021 (this “Amendment”), is by and between Lordstown Motors Corp., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”),
and Daniel Ninivaggi (the “Executive”).


 


RECITALS: 


 


WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive are parties
to that certain Employment Agreement dated as of August 26, 2021 (the “Original Agreement”);


 


WHEREAS, the parties hereto desire to amend the
Original Agreement on the terms and conditions set forth herein, effective as of November 29, 2021, in connection with the appointment
of Edward Hightower as President of the Company;


 


NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises
and of the mutual covenants herein contained, the parties hereto agree as follows:


 


1.      
Amendment of Original Agreement. Section 3(a) is hereby amended and restated in its entirety:


 


“(a)               Base
Salary.  Company shall pay to Executive a base salary in the amount of $675,000 per annum (the “Annual Base Salary”),
payable in equal periodic installments less all customary payroll deductions (with such annual salary for any part of a month to be paid
on a prorated basis), in accordance with customary policies and normal payroll practices of Company.”


 


2.      
Execution in Counterparts. This Amendment may be executed in any number of identical counterparts, any of which may contain
the signatures of less than all parties, and all of which together shall constitute a single agreement.


 


3.      
Applicable Law. All questions concerning the construction, validity and interpretation of this Amendment and the performance
of the obligations imposed by this Amendment shall be governed by the internal laws of the State of Ohio applicable to agreements made
and wholly to be performed in such state without regard to conflicts of law provisions of any jurisdiction.


 


4.      
Effect of Amendment. Except as expressly amended hereby, all terms of the Original Agreement shall remain unmodified and
in full force and effect.


 


[Signature Page Follows]


 






    


     


    

 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this
Amendment as of the date first set forth above.


 


	 	COMPANY:
	 	 
	 	LORDSTOWN MOTORS CORP.
	 	 
	 	By:	/s/
    Thomas V. Canepa
	 	Name: Thomas V. Canepa
	 	Its: General Counsel and Corporate
    Secretary
	 	 
	 	EXECUTIVE:
	 	 
	 	/s/
    Daniel Ninivaggi
	 	Daniel Ninivaggi






 


[Signature Page to Employment Agreement Amendment]
### §1599j. Restricted reports of incidents of adult sexual assault

(a) Restricted Reports.—The Secretary of Defense may provide a civilian employee of the Department of Defense an opportunity to submit to an individual described in subsection (d) a restricted report of an alleged incident of adult sexual assault for the purpose of assisting the employee in obtaining information and access to authorized victim support services provided by the Department.

(b) Restrictions on Disclosures and Initiating Investigations.—Unless the Secretary determines that a disclosure is necessary to prevent or mitigate a serious and imminent safety threat to the employee submitting the report or to another person, a restricted report submitted pursuant to subsection (a) shall not—

(1) be disclosed to the supervisor of the employee or any other management official; or

(2) cause the initiation of a Federal civil or criminal investigation.

(c) Duties Under Other Laws.—The receipt of a restricted report submitted under subsection (a) shall not be construed as imputing actual or constructive knowledge of an alleged incident of sexual assault to the Department of Defense for any purpose.

(d) Individuals Authorized to Receive Restricted Reports.—An individual described in this subsection is an individual who performs victim advocate duties under a program for one or more of the following purposes (or any other program designated by the Secretary):

(1) Sexual assault prevention and response.

(2) Victim advocacy.

(3) Equal employment opportunity.

(4) Workplace violence prevention and response.

(5) Employee assistance.

(6) Family advocacy.

(e) Definitions.—In this section:

(1) Civilian employee.—The term "civilian employee" has the meaning given the term "employee" in section 2105 of title 5.

(2) Sexual assault.—The term "sexual assault" has the meaning given that term in section 920 of this title (article 120 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), and includes penetrative offenses and sexual contact offenses.

(Added Pub. L. 117–263, div. A, title XI, §1101(a), Dec. 23, 2022, 136 Stat. 2815.)
### MEMORANDUM

**DATE:** 0 1/ 22/2015 **FROM:** Laura Farris/EPA Region 8 **TO:** Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants; Docket Id: OAR

–2013

-0602 **SUBJECT:** Center for the New Energy Economy’s Western States Meeting on 0 1/22/2015

**SUMMARY :**  Callie Videtich , EPA Region 8 Acting Assistant Regional Administrator, attended the Center for the New Energy Economy’s Western States Meeting on 01/ 22/2015 to discuss the Clean Power Plan . The meeting was held in in Phoenix, Arizona. The Clean Power Plan was proposed on June 2, 2014.

**ATTENDEES:**

**EPA** Callie Videtich, EPA Region 8 , Acting Assistant Regional Administrator Colleen McKaughan , EPA Region 9 Kate Kelly, EPA Region 10

**E xternal Stakeholders**  **First Name Last Name**  **Company** Henry Darwin Arizona Eric Massey Arizona Steve Burr Arizona Tracy Terry Bipartisan Policy Center Kristen Driskell California Energy Commission Tung Le CARB Dennis Arfmann Center for the New Energy Economy Patrick Cummins Center for the New Energy Economy Jeff Lyng Center for the New Energy Economy Tom Plant Center for the New Energy Economy Bill Ritter Center for the New Energy Economy Wi ll Allison Colorado Martha Rudolph Colorado Jeff Burks Energy Strategies Rick Sprott Energy Strategies Gibson Peters Energy Strategies Scott Pugrud Idaho Tim Baker Montana Eugenia Quintana Navajo Nation Raju Bisht Navajo Nation April Quinn Navajo Nation Colleen Cripps Nevada Dave Emme Nevada Cindy Hollenberg New Mexico Anne Jakle New Mexico Terry O'Clair North Dakota Elizabeth Osborne NW Power and Conservation Council**First Name Last Name**  **Company**

Colin McConnaha Oregon Jessica Shipley Oregon Department of Energy John Larsen Rhodium Group Brian Gustafson South Dakota Glade Sowards Utah Division of Air Quality Bill Drumheller Wa shington Vijay Satyal WE CC Jeff Gabler WE STAR Dan Johnson WE STAR Tom Carr We stern Interstate Energy Board Alaine Ginocchio We stern Interstate Energy Board Steve Dietrich Wyoming Todd Parfitt Wyoming
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# DOD Officials Testify About Homeland Defense Before House Panel

By Jim GaramoneDOD News

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More
#### § 1000.330 What is the purpose of this subpart?

This subpart explains what happens when a Tribe/Consortium voluntarily returns a program to a bureau.
#### § 158.53 Order to change designation of homestead.

The application of an Osage allottee, or his legal guardian, may be approved by the Secretary of the Interior, or his authorized representative, and an order issued to change designation of homestead, if it is found that the applicant owns an equal area of surplus land. The expense of recording the order shall be borne by the applicant. The order to change designation shall be made on the form “Order to Change Designation of Homestead.”