alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 457.101 Purpose.

This part effectuates section 119 of the Rehabilitation, Comprehensive Services, and Developmental Disabilities Amendments of 1978, which amended section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 to prohibit discrimination on the basis of handicap in programs or activities conducted by Executive agencies or the United States Postal Service.
EXHIBIT
10.1


 


Second
AMENDMENT TO

ACTINIUM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. 2019 PLAN


  


This
Second Amendment to Actinium Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 2019 Plan (this “Amendment”),
effective as of November 9, 2021, is made and entered into by Actinium Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”).
Terms used in this Amendment with initial capital letters that are not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to such
terms in the Actinium Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 2019 Plan (the “Original Plan”), as amended by that certain Amendment
to Actinium Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 2019 Plan, effective as of November 18, 2020 (collectively with the Original Plan, the “Plan”).


  


RECITALS


 


WHEREAS,
Section 16(a) of the Plan provides that the Board may amend the Plan at any time and from time to time;


 


WHEREAS,
the Board desires to amend the Plan to increase the aggregate number of shares of Common Stock that may be issued under the Plan as set
forth in Section 3 of the Plan by an additional 2,750,000 shares of Common Stock; and


 


WHEREAS,
the Board intends to submit this Amendment to the Company’s stockholders for their approval.


 


NOW,
THEREFORE, in accordance with Section 16(a) of the Plan, the Company hereby amends the Plan as follows:


 


1. Section
3 of the Plan is hereby amended by deleting the first sentence of said section in its entirety and substituting in lieu thereof the following
new sentence:


 


Subject to the provisions
of Section 14 of the Plan, the maximum aggregate number of Shares reserved for issuance to Participants under the Plan is 5,833,333,
and the maximum aggregate number of Shares that may be granted in the form of Incentive Stock Options is 5,833,333.


 


2. Except
as expressly amended by this Amendment, the Plan shall continue in full force and effect in accordance with the provisions thereof.


 


********


 


IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Amendment to be duly executed as of the date first written above.


  


	 	ACTINIUM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
	 	 	 
	 	By:	/s/ Sandesh Seth
	 	Name: 	Sandesh Seth
	 	Title:	Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
matters. 

SERVED: February 4, 2014 

US DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

IN THE MATTER OF 

SKYWEST AIRLINES 

FAA DOCKET NOS. [TO BE ASSIGNED] 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

FDMS NO. FAA-2012- Q868 

FDMS NO. FAA-2012- 0869 

FDMS NO. FAA-2012- 0872 

FDMS NO. F AA-2012- 0873 

FDMS NO. F AA-2012- 0874 

FDMS NO. FAA-2012- 0904 

FDMS NO. FAA-2013- 0617 

FDMS NO. FAA-2013- 0619 

ORDER STAYING PROCEEDINGS 

The parties have filed a Joint Motion to Stay Proceedings in the above captioned 

WHEREFORE, the Joint Motion to Stay Proceedings having been read and considered 

it be and is hereby ORDERED, as follows: 

1. Proceedings in the above captioned matters are STAYED until June 2, 2014; and 

2. One or more of the matters may be set for hearing on or after June 2, 2014 unless 

otherwise resolved prior June 2, 2014. 

Richard C. Goodwin 

U.S. Administrative Law Judge 

Attachment - Service List 
SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W10001 

Todd C. Emerson, Respondent's Counsel 

Director- Government and Legal Affairs 

Sky West Airlines 

444 South River Road 

. St. George, UT 84 790 

TEL: 435-634-3530 

FPC(: 435-634-3505 

ONE COPY 

Michael L. Dworkin, Respondent's Counsel 

MICHAEL L. DWORKIN AND ASSOCIATES 

465 California Street, Suite 210 

San Francisco, CA 94104 

TEL: 415-421-2500 

FAX: 415-421-2560 

EMAIL: law@avialex.com 

Robert Spitzer, Complainant's Counsel 

Attorney, Office of Regional Counsel 

Northwest Mountain Region, ANM-7 

Federal Aviation Administration 

1601 Lind Avenue, S.W. 

Renton, W A 98057 

TEL: 425-227-1417 

FPC(: 425-227-1007 

FDMS Nos. FAA-2012-

0868,2012-0869,2012-0872, 

2012-0873,2012-0874,2013-

0617, 2013-0619 

(Civil Penalty Actions) 

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

· Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2WIOOO, Washington, 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 

2 
The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge 

Office ofHe.arings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-5121 Staff Assistant 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

3
#### § 602.7 Multi-track processing.

The NCPC may use multiple tracks for processing FOIA Requests based on the complexity of Requests and those for which expedited processing is Requested. Complexity shall be determined based on the amount of work and/or time needed to process a Request and/or the number of pages of responsive Records. If the NCPC utilizes Multi-track Processing, it shall advise a Requester when a Request is placed in a slower track of the limits associated with a faster track and afford the Requester the opportunity to limit the scope of its Request to qualify for faster processing.
In the United States Court of Federal Claims 

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 13-725V

Filed: December 19, 2014

Not for Publication

*************************************

ANNETTE PACKEY, *

*

 Petitioner, * Attorneys’ fees and costs decision based on

 * stipulation of fact

v. *

 *

SECRETARY OF HEALTH *

AND HUMAN SERVICES, *

 *

 Respondent. *

*

*************************************

Danielle A. Strait, Washington, DC, for petitioner.

Lindsay Corliss, Washington, DC, for respondent.

MILLMAN, Special Master

DECISION AWARDING ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS1

On December 19, 2014, the parties filed a stipulation of fact in which they agreed on an 

appropriate amount for attorneys’ fees and costs in this case. 

In accordance with the General Order #9 requirement, petitioner asserts that she did not 

incur any costs in pursuit of her petition. Petitioner submitted a draft application for attorneys’ 

fees and costs to respondent. During informal discussions, respondent raised objections to certain 

items in petitioner’s application. Based on these objections, petitioner amends her application for 

 

1 Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the special master’s action in this 

case, the special master intends to post this unpublished decision on the United States Court of Federal 

Claims’s website, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-347, 116 Stat. 2899, 

2913 (Dec. 17, 2002). Vaccine Rule 18(b) states that all decisions of the special masters will be made 

available to the public unless they contain trade secrets or commercial or financial information that is 

privileged and confidential, or medical or similar information whose disclosure would constitute a clearly 

unwarranted invasion of privacy. When such a decision is filed, petitioner has 14 days to identify and 

move to redact such information prior to the document=s disclosure. If the special master, upon review, 

agrees that the identified material fits within the banned categories listed above, the special master shall 

redact such material from public access.
2

attorneys’ fees and costs to $22,068.91. Respondent does not object to this amount. The 

undersigned finds this amount to be reasonable. Accordingly, the court awards $22,068.91, 

representing reimbursement for attorneys’ fees and costs. The award shall be in the form of a 

check payable jointly to petitioner and Maglio, Christopher & Toale, P.A., located at 1605 Main 

Street, Suite 710, Sarasota, Florida 34326, in the amount of $22,068.91.

In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the clerk of the 

court is directed to enter judgment herewith.2

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: December 19, 2014 s/ Laura D. Millman

 Laura D. Millman

 Special Master

 

2

Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by each party, either separately or 

jointly, filing a notice renouncing the right to seek review.
§ 51.5 How does an agency request approval? ( a ) For a proposed rule, the agency does not request formal approval but must: ( 1 ) Discuss, in the preamble of the proposed rule, the ways that the materials it proposes to incorporate by reference are reasonably available to interested parties or how it worked to make those materials reasonably available to interested parties; and
( 2 ) Summarize, in the preamble of the proposed rule, the material it proposes to incorporate by reference.
( b ) For a final rule, the agency must request formal approval. The formal request package must: ( 1 ) Send a letter that contains a written request for approval at least 20 working days before the agency intends to submit the final rule document for publication;
( 2 ) Discuss, in the preamble of the final rule, the ways that the materials it incorporates by reference are reasonably available to interested parties and how interested parties can obtain the materials;
( 3 ) Summarize, in the preamble of the final rule, the material it incorporates by reference;
( 4 ) Send a copy of the final rule document that uses the proper language of incorporation with the written request (See § 51.9); and
( 5 ) Ensure that a copy of the incorporated material is on file at the Office of the Federal Register.
( c ) Agencies may consult with the Office of the Federal Register at any time with respect to the requirements of this part.
[79 FR 66278, Nov. 7, 2014]
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 31 (Tuesday, February 15, 2011)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 8699-8700]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-3396]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Surface Transportation Board

49 CFR Part 1201

[Docket No. EP 706]


Reporting Requirements for Positive Train Control Expenses and 
Investments

AGENCY: Surface Transportation Board, DOT.

ACTION: Notice of intent to institute a rulemaking proceeding.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In a decision served on February 10, 2011, the Board granted a 
petition by the Union Pacific Railroad Company (UP) to institute a 
rulemaking proceeding to explore whether the Board should require Class 
I railroads to report separately how much each railroad is spending on 
the development, installation, and maintenance of Positive Train 
Control, a federally mandated safety system that will automatically 
stop or slow a train before an accident can occur. Several parties 
filed comments in reply to UP's petition. The Board will address the 
arguments and issues raised in those filings in a subsequent decision. 
The Board's decision makes no determination on the merits of UP's 
specific proposal.

DATES: The Board's decision became effective on February 10, 2011. The 
Board will establish further procedures for public comment in a 
subsequent decision.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Valerie Quinn, (202) 245-0382. Federal 
Information Relay Service (FIRS) for the hearing impaired, (800) 877-
8339.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Additional information is contained in the 
Board's February 10, 2011, decision, which is available on our Web site 
at http://www.stb.dot.gov. Copies of the decision may be purchased by 
contacting the Board's Office of Public Assistance, Governmental 
Affairs, and Compliance at (202) 245-0236. Assistance for the hearing 
impaired is available through FIRS at (800) 877-8339.
    This action will not significantly affect either the quality of the 
human

[[Page 8700]]

environment or the conservation of energy resources.

    Decided: February 10, 2011.

    By the Board, Chairman Elliott, Vice Chairman Nottinham, and 
Commissioner Mulvey.
Jeffrey Herzig,
Clearance Clerk.
[FR Doc. 2011-3396 Filed 2-14-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915-01-P
Exhibit 31.4



CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL
OFFICER OF GLOBAL MEDICAL REIT INC.



PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002



I, Donald McClure, Chief Financial Officer
of Global Medical REIT Inc., certify that:



|1. | I have reviewed Amendments No. 1 and No. 2 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016 of Global Medical REIT Inc.; and                                                                                                                                                          
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|2. | Based on my knowledge, these reports do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by these reports.



|      |            
|----- | -----------
|      |            
|Date: | May 8, 2017
|      |            
|      |
Oregon IP for Aquatic Weed Control, No 102541 

What is Covered 

Authorizes Klamath Irrigation District to apply acrolein-based herbicides to Lost River 

The basic requirements of this Individual Permit include: 

 A Written Contingency Plan for the prevention, containment, and handling of 

spills and unplanned discharges 

 An Integrated Aquatic Vegetation Management Plan to examine the 

possibility of alternatives to reduce the need for aquatic herbicides. The Plan also 

determines site specific action thresholds for plant removal, ensures that the least 

possible amount of herbicide is used, and evaluates infrastructure to identify 

changes that could be made to reduce growth of aquatic vegetation. Requires 

consideration of Integrated Pest Management. 

In updating its plan, the permittee must ensure that: 

a) Herbicides are used only after the assessment of all available control technologies. 

b) Site-specific action thresholds for aquatic plantremoval are determined. 

c) The least amount ofthe herbicide needed to effectively control the aquatic weeds is 

added to the 

irrigation system. 

d) The latest chemical control technologies are considered and used. 

e) An evaluation of the infrastructure to identify changes that could be made to 

reduce growth of 

aquatic vegetation is performed. 

f) A schedule for implementing the plan is developed if necessary. 

 Annual Report of acrolein-based herbicide applied during the calendar year, 

name of aquatic herbicide, EPA Registration Number, and formulation 

information. In lieu of an annual report, the permittee may submit this 

information on a monthly basis with its monitoring data. 

 The permittee must evaluate fish screening practices in application areas to 

determine if any additional practices are required to make fish screening more 

effective. 

 The permittee must observe Waste Discharge Limitations (2.3ug/l/day for 

arcolein) 

 The permittee must observe all Required Management Practices described in 

Permit including inspection and repair of gates, use of licensed applicator, 

maintenance of application records and log 

 Permittee must make annual public notice of intent to apply prior to first 

application and make available application schedule 
The permit allows for reduced monitoring when canal gates are managed as described in 

Section A4 to reduce the likelihood of acrolein being released from gates into receiving 

waters (they have optional BMPs that qualify a discharger for reduced monitoring) 
Monitoring Requirements:
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

#  U.S. Navy Concludes Training with Bangladesh Navy

CHATTOGRAM, U.S. Embassy in Bangladesh -- From October 17 to November 10, the U.S. Embassy held the second Joint Combined Exchange Training (JCET) exercise of 2022 between U.S. Naval Special Warfare (NSW) and the Bangladesh Navy Special Warfare Diving & Salvage (BN SWADS). The JCET is the latest in a series of initiatives aimed at enhancing the forces’ combat readiness and their ability to respond to maritime threats.The BN SWADS and NSW trainers undertook a four-week physically demanding training exercise that familiarized participants with patrolling and crisis response tactics. Objectives for the training included fundamentals of underway medical training and boat maintenance, maritime mission planning, vessel boarding search and seizure maneuvering, and maritime communications.By the end of the course, the 42 participants from BN SWADS expertly navigated their U.S. manufactured Defender and MetalShark patrol boats on the Karnafuli River and Bay of Bengal, demonstrating professionalism and preparedness to defend Bangladesh and promote and protect Bangladesh’s maritime interests.Since 2009, U.S. Naval Special Warfare sailors and Special Forces soldiers have successfully trained more than 400 BN SWADS sailors through the JCET exercises. Through its partnership with Bangladesh, the United States is committed to enhancing stability in the Indo-Pacific region by promoting security cooperation, encouraging peaceful development, and responding to crises.

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. 

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 

2008-3083 

ELIZABETH A. JOHNSON, 

 

 Petitioner, 

v. 

 

MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD, 

 Respondent, 

and 

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY, 

 Intervenor. 

M. Jefferson Euchler, Law Office of M. Jefferson Euchler, of Virginia Beach, 

Virginia, argued for petitioner. 

Sara B. Rearden, Attorney, Office of the General Counsel, Merit Systems Protection 

Board, of Washington, DC, argued for respondent. With her on the brief were B. Chad 

Bungard, General Counsel, and Stephanie M. Conley, Acting Assistant General Counsel. 

 

Tara K. Hogan, Trial Attorney, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United 

States Department of Justice, of Washington, DC, for intervenor. With her on the brief 

were Jeffrey S. Bucholtz, Acting Assistant Attorney General, Jeanne E. Davidson, Director, 

and Martin F. Hockey, Jr., Assistant Director. Of counsel was Louise A. Schmidt, Chief, 

Civilian Personnel Branch, United States Army Legal Services Agency, of Arlington, 

Virginia. 

 

Appealed from: Merit Systems Protection Board 
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. 

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 

 2008-3083 

ELIZABETH A. JOHNSON, 

 Petitioner, 

v. 

MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD, 

 Respondent, 

 and 

 DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY, 

 Intervenor. 

 Judgment

ON APPEAL from the Merit Systems Protection Board 

in CASE NO(S). DC0752070338-I-1 

This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is 

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 

Per Curiam (NEWMAN, MAYER and LOURIE, Circuit Judges). 

 AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. 

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT 

 

DATED: October 20, 2008 /s/Jan Horbaly 

 Jan Horbaly, Clerk
**
**Exhibit 15.4**

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No. 333-224206) on Form F-3 of Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. of our report dated March 7, 2018, except for the fourth paragraph in Note 18, as to which the date is March 15, 2019, with respect to the consolidated statementof operations, comprehensive loss, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows of TerraForm Power, Inc. and subsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 2017, and the related notes, which report appears in the annual report on Form 20-F, as amended by Amendment No. 1 on Form 20-F/A, of Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. 

/s/ KPMG LLP 

McLean, Virginia 

March 18, 2020 
**
### SUBCHAPTER II—RELATIONSHIP, CONTINUATION, AND COMMON POLICIES OF DEFENSE COMMISSARY AND EXCHANGE SYSTEMS

Sec.
2487.
Relationship between defense commissary system and exchange stores system.
2488.
Combined exchange and commissary stores.
2489.
Overseas commissary and exchange stores: access and purchase restrictions.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**2004**—Pub. L. 108–375, div. A, title VI, §651(b)(1), Oct. 28, 2004, 118 Stat. 1971, added subchapter heading and items 2487 to 2489.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# U.S. and Republic of Korea Conduct Bilateral Exercise

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command Public Affairs

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT