alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Japan Ground Self-Defense Force Celebrates 10-Year Anniversary at Camp Zama  

By Tim FlackU.S. Army Garrison Japan Public Affairs

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More
§ 115.401 What is a minor's supervised account? A minor's supervised account is a restricted IIM account from which all disbursements must be made pursuant to a distribution plan approved by the BIA that is established for: ( a ) A minor, or
( b ) An emancipated minor.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

**JTF - Micronesia Menu**

                        - JTF-M Leadership
                        - JTF-M Press Room                            - News
                          - Stories
                          More
                        - JTF-M Documents
                        - JTF-M Contact Us

# Deputy Secretary of Defense Dr. Kathleen Hicks' 2022 Holiday Message

DOD Immediate Release

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More
#### § 1000.168 Is it mandatory to go through the information phase before initiating the negotiation phase?

No, a Tribe/Consortium may go directly to the negotiation phase.
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 95

To make Members of Congress ineligible to participate in the Federal

Employees’ Retirement System.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 6, 1999

Mr. COBLE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Government Reform, and in addition to the Committee on House Administration, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker,

in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

A BILL

To make Members of Congress ineligible to participate in

the Federal Employees’ Retirement System.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. INELIGIBILITY TO PARTICIPATE IN FERS.

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Except as otherwise provided in

5 this section, effective as of the date of the enactment of

6 this Act, a Member of Congress shall be ineligible to par7 ticipate in the Federal Employees’ Retirement System.

8 (b) EXCEPTION.—Subsection (a) shall not apply with

9 respect to any individual who, as of the date of the enact-
2

•HR 95 IH

1 ment of this Act, satisfies the requirements of section

2 8410 of title 5, United States Code, for being considered

3 eligible for an annuity under subchapter II of chapter 84

4 of such title.

5 (c) REFUNDS OF CONTRIBUTIONS.—

6 (1) IN GENERAL.—Nothing in subsection (a)

7 shall prevent appropriate refunds from being made,

8 in accordance with applicable provisions of law, on

9 account of an individual’s becoming ineligible to par10 ticipate in the Federal Employees’ Retirement Sys11 tem as a result of the enactment of this Act.

12 (2) SPECIAL RULE.—For purposes of making

13 any refunds in accordance with paragraph (1), a

14 Member who becomes ineligible to participate in the

15 Federal Employees’ Retirement System as a result

16 of the enactment of this Act shall be treated in the

17 same way as if separated from service.

18 (d) ANNUITANTS NOT AFFECTED.—Subsection (a)

19 shall not be considered to apply with respect to—

20 (1) any former Member of Congress who, as of

21 the date of the enactment of this Act, is entitled (or

22 would on proper application be entitled) to an annu23 ity computed, in whole or in part, by reference to

24 section 8415 of title 5, United States Code; or
3

•HR 95 IH

1 (2) any individual who, as of the date of the en2 actment of this Act, is entitled (or would on proper

3 application be entitled) to an annuity as a survivor

4 of a former Member of Congress.

5 SEC. 2. DEFINITION.

6 For purposes of this Act, the terms ‘‘Member of Con7 gress’’ and ‘‘Member’’ have the same meaning as the term

8 ‘‘Member’’ under section 8401(20) of title 5, United

9 States Code.

Æ
§ 603.8 Employee conduct. ( a ) Employees with duties requiring access to and handling of Records shall, at all times, take care to protect the integrity, security, and confidentiality of the Records.
( b ) No employee of the NCPC shall disclose Records unless disclosure is permitted by § 603.10(b), by part 602 of this chapter, or disclosed to the Individual to whom the Record pertains.
( c ) No employee of the NCPC shall alter or destroy a Record unless such Record or destruction is undertaken in the course of the employee's regular duties or such alteration or destruction is allowed pursuant to regulations published by the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) or required by a court of competent jurisdiction. Records shall not be destroyed or disposed of while they are the subject of a pending request, appeal or lawsuit under the Privacy Act.
Exhibit 23.2

**Consent of Independent RegisteredPublic Accounting Firm**

 

We consent to the incorporation by referencein Registration Statements No. 333-188817 and 333-194894 on Form F-3 and No. 333-187020 on Form S-8, of our reports dated March14, 2016, relating to the consolidated financial statements of GasLog Ltd. (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2015and December 31, 2014, and for each of the years in the two year period ended December 31, 2015, and the effectiveness of GasLogLtd’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2015, appearing in the Annual Report on Form 20-F of theCompan*y*for the year ended December 31, 2015.

 

/s/ Deloitte LLP

 

London, United Kingdom
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-7005

THOMAS WILLIAM BROWNING, Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus STEVE HARPER, Metropolitan Drug Enforcement Network Team Police Officer; M.K. CRUICKSHANK, Senior Trooper, Defendants - Appellees, and
KANAWHA COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT; D.G. PAINTER, Resources Officer; WEST VIRGINIA STATE POLICE; STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA; COUNTY OF KANAWHA, Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Charleston. Charles H. Haden II, District Judge. (CA-00-619-2) Submitted: December 11, 2003 Decided: December 19, 2003 Before NIEMEYER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.2 Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Thomas William Browning, Appellant Pro Se. Theresa Marlene Kirk, PULLIN, FOWLER & FLANAGAN, P.L.L.C., Charleston, West Virginia; Michael Deering Mullins, STEPTOE & JOHNSON, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).3 PER CURIAM: Thomas William Browning appeals the district court judgment and order entering judgment in favor of the defendants. Browning filed a complaint alleging excessive force by two law enforcement officials during an arrest. After a bench trial, the district court dismissed one defendant as a matter of law and the other defendant on the facts. We affirm. We find the district court did not abuse its discretion denying the motion for production of transcripts at government expense. Insofar as Browning claims his counsel was ineffective, the Sixth Amendment right to effective assistance of counsel does not apply in civil cases. Sanchez v. United States Postal Service , 785 F.2d 1236, 1237 (5th Cir. 1986). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 917

To designate the Federal building and United States Post Office located

at 705 N. Plaza Street in Carson City, Nevada, as the ‘‘Paul Laxalt

Federal Building and United States Post Office’’.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 2, 1999

Mr. GIBBONS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

A BILL

To designate the Federal building and United States Post

Office located at 705 N. Plaza Street in Carson City,

Nevada, as the ‘‘Paul Laxalt Federal Building and

United States Post Office’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

4 The Federal building and United States Post Office

5 located at 705 N. Plaza Street in Carson City, Nevada,

6 shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Paul Laxalt Fed7 eral Building and United States Post Office’’.
2

•HR 917 IH

1 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

2 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

3 paper, or other record of the United States to the Federal

4 building and United States Post Office referred to in sec5 tion 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Paul Lax6 alt Federal Building and United States Post Office’’.

Æ
#### The City of New York, Respondent, v. Louis Urgalo and John Crispi, Appellants.

Motion denied, without costs, provided the appellants perfect their appeal in time to place the' case upon the next calendar of this court and be ready for argument when the cause is reached; otherwise motion granted, with ten dollars costs. Present—Woodward, Jenks, Hooker, Gaynor and Miller, JJ.
§ 425.2 Procedures for notification of existence of records pertaining to individuals. ( a ) The system of records, as defined in the Privacy Act of 1974, maintained by the President's Commission on White House Fellowships is listed annually in the Federal Register as required by that Act. Any person who wishes to know whether a system of records contains a record pertaining to him or her may either appear in person at Room 1308, 1900 E Street, NW., on work days between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 5 p.m. or may write to the President's Commission on White House Fellowships Administrative Officer, Washington, DC 20415 (Phone 202-382-4661). It is recommended that requests be made in writing.
( b ) Requests for notification of the existence of a record should state, if the requester is other than the individual to whom the record pertains, the relationship of the requester to that individual. (Note that requests will not be honored by the Commission pursuant to the Privacy Act unless made: ( 1 ) By the individual to whom the record pertains or
( 2 ) by such individual's legal guardian if the individual has been declared to be incompetent due to physical or mental incapacity or age by a court of competent jurisdiction.)
( c ) The Commission will acknowledge requests for the existence of records within 10 working days from the time it receives the request and will normally notify the requester of the existence or non-existence of records within 30 working days from receipt of request.
( d ) No special identity verification is required for individuals who wish to know whether a specific system of records pertains to them.
[40 FR 52416, Nov. 10, 1975; 40 FR 56651, Dec. 4, 1975, as amended at 40 FR 59187, Dec. 22, 1975]
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Summer motor vehicle use map.White River National Forest. Blanco, Eagle (NW portion) and Rifle (N portion)Ranger Districts, Colorado**
 
2016: Front | Back
 
SuDoc Number:A 13.28:W 58/20/
Item Number:0080-G (online)
CGP systemNumber:001037433
 
December 18, 2017
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

Record of Phone Call 

DATE: August 9, 2016 

The purpose of this call from Guy Donaldson (EPA) to an AEP Flint Creek Plant representative 

was to verify the status of the installation of a NID scrubber at Flint Creek, in order to adequately 

respond to comments we received during the public comment period on the Arkansas Regional 

Haze FIP proposal. The plant representative confirmed that the NID scrubber installation is 

complete and that the upgraded plant is now fully online as of June 2016.
#### § 426.211 Other rights and services.

Nothing in this subpart shall be construed to entitle any person, as of right, to any service or to the disclosure of any record to which such person is not entitled under the FOIA.
Exhibit 32

  Certification of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer
                       Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
                             as Adopted Pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

The undersigned, the Principal Executive Officer (CEO) and the Principal
Financial Officer (Chief Financial Officer) of Millenia Hope Inc. (the
"Company"), each hereby certifies that to his knowledge on the date hereof:

          (a)  The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the period
               ended May 31, 2007, filed on the date hereof with the Securities
               and Exchange Commission (the "Report") fully complies with the
               requirements of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities
               Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (b)  Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
               material respects, the financial condition and results of
               operations of the Company.


Date: July 5,2007


                                                    /s/ Leonard Stella
                                           -------------------------------------
                                                    Leonard Stella
                                                    Chief Executive Officer


Date: July 5,2007


                                                    /s/ Hugo Valente
                                           -------------------------------------
                                                    Hugo Valente
                                                    Chief Financial Officer


This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed
by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended.
§ 115.1000 Who owns the records associated with this part? ( a ) Records are the property of the United States if they: ( 1 ) Are made or received by a tribe or tribal organization in the conduct of a federal trust function under this part, including the operation of a trust program pursuant to 25 U.S.C. 450f *et seq.;* and
( 2 ) Evidence the organization, functions, policies, decisions, procedures, operations, or other activities undertaken in the performance of a federal trust function under this part.
( b ) Records not covered by paragraph (a) of this section that are made or received by a tribe or tribal organization in the conduct of business with the Department of the Interior under this part are the property of the tribe.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

May 30, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
130387 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 130387 COA: 266285 Macomb CC: 04-001785-FH JASON SCOTT ZYGAJ, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, th e application for leave to a ppeal the December 8, 2005 order of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented s hould be reviewed by this Court.

K ELLY , J., would hold this case in abeyance for People v Drohan , lv gtd 472 Mich 881 (2005).

p0522 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

May 30, 2006

Clerk
§ 1000.212 What is the role of the Tribe/Consortium when a bureau initiates a public meeting? When a bureau initiates a public meeting with affected parties it will take the following actions: ( a ) The bureau will notify the Tribe/Consortium of the meeting time, place, and invited parties: ( 1 ) Ten days in advance, if possible; or
( 2 ) If less than 10 days in advance, at the earliest practical time.
( b ) When the bureau notifies the Tribe/Consortium, the bureau will invite the Tribe/Consortium to participate in and, unless prohibited by law, to co-sponsor or co-facilitate the meeting.
( c ) When possible, the bureau and the Tribe/Consortium should meet to plan and discuss the conduct of the meeting, meeting protocols, and general participation in the proposed consultation meeting.
( d ) The bureau and the Tribe/Consortium will conduct the meeting in a manner that facilitates and does not undermine the government-to-government relationship and self-governance;
( e ) The Tribe/Consortium may provide technical support to the bureau to enhance the consultation process, as mutually agreed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Credit Union Administration

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Mary Rupp, Secretary of the Board,                         *Telephone:*                         (703) 518-6304.                    

Linda Dent,

Acting Board Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2011-33822 Filed 12-30-11; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 7535-01-P
§ 1000.425 How does a Tribe/Consortium request an informal conference? The Tribe/Consortium shall file its request for an informal conference with the office of the person whose decision it is appealing, within 30 days of the day it receives the decision. ( a ) The Tribe/Consortium may either hand-deliver the request for an informal conference to that person's office, fax the request with confirmation or mail it by certified mail, return receipt requested.
( b ) If the Tribe/Consortium mails the request, it will be considered filed on the date the Tribe/Consortium mailed it by certified mail.
### IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10

- 14

- 00178

- CV

GEORGE PAPPAS

, Appellant

v.

CITY OF WAXAHACHIE, TEXAS,

WAXAHACHIE FIREFIGHT ERS' &

POLICE OFFICERS' CIV IL SERVICE

COMMISSION, GAYLE SI MMS

& CHARLES EDGE

, Appellee s

From the 40th District Court

Ellis County, Texas

Trial Court No. 88719

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant has filed a “Motion for Voluntary Dismissal.” See T EX

. R. A PP

. P.

42.1(a)(1). He seeks dismissal of this appeal with costs to be assessed against the party

incurring them.Pappas v. City of Waxahachie Page 2

D ismissal of this appeal would not prevent a party from seeking relief to which it

would otherwise be entitled , and the certificate of conference represents that Appellees

do not oppose this motion . The motion is granted, and the appeal is dismissed with

each party to pay the costs in this behalf expended as they have been incurred.

REX D. DAVIS

Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Scoggins

Motion granted; appeal dismissed

Opini on delivered and filed November 20, 2014

[CV06]
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 965

To provide that December 7 each year shall be treated for all purposes

related to Federal employment in the same manner as November 11.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 4, 1999

Mr. QUINN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Government Reform

A BILL

To provide that December 7 each year shall be treated for

all purposes related to Federal employment in the same

manner as November 11.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That December 7 each year shall be treated for all pur4 poses related to Federal employment in the same manner

5 as November 11.

Æ