alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Relevant Meetings**  **with External Stakeholders since Publication of the 201 2**  **HCFC Proposed Rule**  **:**

January 10, 2012 – EPA staff attended A lliance for Responsible Atmospheric Policy board meeting January 19, 2012 – Meeting with representatives from Rapid Recovery January 30, 2012 – Meeting with representatives from DuPont January 31, 2012 – EPA staff attended the Alliance Refrigerant Imports Committee Meeting February 2, 2012 – Meeting with a group of reclaimers (see attached list) February 3, 2012 – Me eting with representatives from the Department of Energy February 6, 2012 – Meeting with representatives from United Technologies (Carrier) February 8, 2012 – Meeting with representatives from the Air-Conditioning, H eating, and R efrigeration I nstitute (AH RI) February 15, 2012 – Meeting with representatives from Honeywell February 22, 2012 – Meeting with representatives from Hudson Technologies March 5, 2012 – Meeting with representatives from Solvay March 19, 2012 – Meeting with representatives from the Food Marketing Institute March 21, 2012 – EPA staff presented at the AHRI Media Roundtable March 21 – Meeting with representatives from the Air Conditioning Contractors of America (ACCA) and Heating, Air-conditioning & Refrigeration Distributors Internation al (HARDI) June 6, 2012 – Meeting with representatives from HARDI and Johnstone Supply June 29, 2012 – Meeting with representatives from DuPont January 16, 2013 – Meeting with representatives from DuPont February 12, 2013 – Meeting with representatives of Honeywell This document does not reflect meetings held at the Office of Management and Budget while the rule was being reviewed in accordance with E.O. 12866 and E.O. 13563 . For a list of those meetings and the participants, please visit http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/oira_2060_meetings/ .
#### Francis B. Taylor, as Receiver, etc., Respondent, v. Stephen H. Kreischer, Appellant.

Judgment of the County Court of Hassau county affirmed, with costs. Ho opinion. Woodward, Jenks, Gaynor, Rich and Miller, JJ., concurred.
#### § 115.102 Adults under legal disability.

The funds of an adult who is non compos mentis or under other legal disability may be disbursed for his benefit for such purposes deemed to be for his best interest and welfare, or the funds may be disbursed to a legal guardian or curator under such conditions as the Secretary or his authorized representative may prescribe.
### §12106. Army and Air Force Reserve: transfer to upon withdrawal as member of National Guard

(a) An enlisted member of the Army National Guard of the United States who ceases to be a member of the Army National Guard becomes a member of the Army Reserve unless he is also discharged from his enlistment as a Reserve.

(b) An enlisted member of the Air National Guard of the United States who ceases to be a member of the Air National Guard becomes a member of the Air Force Reserve unless he is also discharged from his enlistment as a Reserve.

(c) An enlisted member who becomes a member of the Army Reserve or the Air Force Reserve under this section ceases to be a member of the Army National Guard of the United States or the Air National Guard of the United States, as the case may be.

(Added Pub. L. 103–337, div. A, title XVI, §1662(b)(1), Oct. 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 2989.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

Provisions similar to those in this section were contained in sections 3260 and 8260 of this title, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 103–337, §1662(b)(3).

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Dec. 1, 1994, except as otherwise provided, see section 1691 of Pub. L. 103–337, set out as a note under section 10001 of this title.
§ 1000.17 What documents must a Tribe/Consortium submit to OSG to apply for admission to the applicant pool? In addition to the application required by § 1000.23, the Tribe/Consortium must submit to OSG documentation that shows all of the following: ( a ) *Successful completion of a planning phase and a planning report.* The requirements for both of these are described in §§ 1000.19 and 1000.20. A Consortium's planning activities satisfy this requirement for all its member Tribes for the purpose of the Consortium meeting this requirement;
( b ) *A request for participation in self-governance by a Tribal resolution and/or a final official action by the Tribal governing body.* For a Consortium, the governing body of each Tribe must authorize its participation by a Tribal resolution and/or a final official action by the Tribal governing body that specifies the scope of the Consortium's authority to act on behalf of the Tribe.
( c ) *A demonstration of financial stability and financial management capability for the previous 3 fiscal years.* This will be done by providing, as part of the application, an audit report prepared in accordance with procedures promulgated under the Single Audit Act Amendments of 1996, 31 U.S.C. 7501, *et seq.,* for the previous 3 years of the self-determination contracts. These audits must not contain material audit exceptions as defined in § 1000.21.
§ 1001.3 Priority ranking for negotiations. In addition to the eligibility criteria identified above, a tribe or consortium of tribes seeking priority ranking for negotiations must submit a description of the efforts of the tribe or consortium to seek to enter negotiations and/or prepare for operations under the self-governance option. This narrative should identify any activities that the tribe has pursued, carefully identifying and documenting the dates involved, including, but not limited to, the following: ( a ) Prior planning activities related to self-governance, noting the source of funding for the planning activity and whether or not it was sanctioned by the Office of Self-Governance (OSG), including documentation as applicable.
( b ) Prior efforts to secure planning and/or negotiation grants.
( c ) Meetings with the OSG or other Departmental offices in which the tribe expressed an interest in participating in the Self-Governance Project.
( d ) Correspondence between the tribe and the Department in which the tribe has expressed an interest in participating in the Self-Governance Project.
( e ) All actions of the tribal governing body related to participating in the self-governance option.
§ 152.5 Issuance of patent in fee. ( a ) An application may be approved and fee patent issued if the Secretary, in his discretion, determines that the applicant is competent. When the patent in fee is delivered, an inventory of the estate covered thereby shall be given to the patentee. (Acts of Feb. 8, 1887 (24 Stat. 388), as amended (25 U.S.C. 349); June 25, 1910 (36 Stat. 855), as amended (25 U.S.C. 372); and May 14, 1948 (62 Stat. 236; 25 U.S.C. 483), and other authorizing acts.)
( b ) If an application is denied, the applicant shall be notified in writing, given the reasons therefor and advised of his right to appeal pursuant to the provisions of part 2 of this chapter.
( c ) White Earth Reservation: The Secretary will, pursuant to the Act of March 1, 1907 (34 Stat. 1015), issue a patent in fee to any adult mixed-blood Indian owning land within the White Earth Reservation in the State of Minnesota upon application from such Indian, and without consideration as to whether the applicant is competent.
( d ) Fort Peck Reservation: Pursuant to the Act of June 30, 1954 (68 Stat. 358), oil and gas underlying certain allotments in the Fort Peck Reservation were granted to certain Indians to be held in trust for such Indians and provisions was made for issuance of patents in fee for such oil and gas or patents in fee for land in certain circumstances. ( 1 ) Where an Indian or Indians were the grantees of the entire interest in the oil and gas underlying a parcel of land, and such Indian or Indians had before June 30, 1954, been issued a patent or patents in fee for any land within the Fort Peck Reservation, the title to the oil and gas was conveyed by the act in fee simple status.
( 2 ) Where the entire interest in the oil and gas granted by the act is after June 30, 1954, held in trust for Indians to whom a fee patent has been issued at any time, for any land within the Fort Peck Reservation, or who have been or are determined by the Secretary to be competent, the Secretary will convey, by patent, without application, therefor, unrestricted fee simple title to the oil and gas.
( 3 ) Where the Secretary determines that the entire interest in a tract of land on the Fort Peck Reservation is owned by Indians who were grantees of oil and gas under the act and he determines that such Indians are competent, he will issue fee patents to them covering all interests in the land without application.
#### Harry C. Guptill, an Infant, by Henry A. Guptill, His Guardian ad Litem, Respondent, v. The Standard Plunger Elevator Company, Appellant.

Judgment and order reversed and new trial granted, costs to abide the event, on the ground that Koster was not a superintendent, nor was the act complained of an act of superintendence. No opinion. Jenks, Gaynor and Miller, JJ., concurred; Woodward and Rich, JJ., voted for affirmance.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-2788
JAMES E. COPLEY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY, Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Clarksburg. Irene M. Keeley, District Judge. (CA-95-38-1) Submitted: May 29, 1997 Decided: June 5, 1997 Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. James E. Copley, Appellant Pro Se. Helen Campbell Altmeyer, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM:Appellant appeals the district court's orders granting Defendant's motion to dismiss, and denying Appellant's motions for reconsideration and "Motion in Opposition Court Order Dated October 4, 1996 to Dismiss Above Case." We have reviewed the record and thedistrict court's opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Copley v. United States Dep't of Energy , No. CA-95-38-1 (N.D.W. Va. Jan. 16, Oct. 4 & Nov. 5, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because thefacts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### § 1200.18 When does the Department's trust responsibility end?

Our trust responsibility for funds withdrawn under this part ends on the date that the funds are withdrawn. However at the time of withdrawal neither we nor the tribe may be deemed to have accepted the account balance at the time of withdrawal as accurate; or waived any rights regarding the balance and our ability to seek compensation.
SCPW-13-0000115

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

 

MICHAEL C. TIERNEY, Petitioner,

vs.

THE HONORABLE RICHARD K. PERKINS OF THE CIRCUIT

COURT OF THE FIRST CIRCUIT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I, Respondent.

 

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

(CR. NO. 88-2209; CR. NO. 89-0024; 

CAAP-11-0000016; SCWC-11-0000016)

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Acoba, McKenna, and Pollack, JJ.)

Upon consideration of petitioner Michael C. Tierney’s

motion for reconsideration of the March 20, 2013 order denying

his petition for a writ of mandamus, which was electronically

filed by the appellate clerk on April 4, 2013, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion for

reconsideration is denied.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, April 10, 2013.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Simeon R. Acoba, Jr.

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Richard W. Pollack

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCPW-13-0000115

10-APR-2013

08:39 AM
**Exhibit
      32.1**





Certification
      Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.
§1350)





I,
      Thomas
      W. Martin, Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President of ICON Capital
      Corp., the General Partner of the Registrant in connection with the Quarterly
      Report of ICON Income Fund Eight A L.P. (the "Partnership") on Form 10-Q/A
      for
      the period ended March 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
      Commission on the date hereof (the "Quarterly Report") certify, pursuant to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my
      knowledge:





1.
            The
                Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                13(a) or
                15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. §78m);
                and





2.
            The
                information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in
                all
                material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
                of
                the Partnership.








*Dated:
      December 11, 2007*





*/s/
      Thomas W. Martin*


Thomas
      W.
      Martin


Chairman,
      Chief Executive Officer and President of the General Partner


(Principal
      Executive Officer)


ICON
      Capital Corp.


General
      Partner of ICON Income Fund Eight A L.P.
#### § 12.2 What is the role of the Bureau of Indian Affairs Director of Law Enforcement Services?

The Director of the Office of Law Enforcement Services for the Bureau of Indian Affairs (Director) has been delegated the responsibility for the development of law enforcement and detention policies, standards, and management of all Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) criminal investigations, drug enforcement, training, internal affairs, inspection and evaluation, emergency response forces, and other national level Indian country law enforcement initiatives. The Director publishes these policies and standards in law enforcement manuals and handbooks. The Director is also directly responsible for developing crime prevention and outreach programs within Indian country law enforcement.
/* Updated 2009-11-04 *//* v2.2.0.24 *//* DefRef Styles */..report table.authRefData{	background-color: #def;	border: 2px solid #2F4497;	font-size: 1em;	position: absolute;}..report table.authRefData a {	display: block;	font-weight: bold;}..report table.authRefData p {	margin-top: 0px;}..report table.authRefData .hide {	background-color: #2F4497;	padding: 1px 3px 0px 0px;	text-align: right;}..report table.authRefData .hide a:hover {	background-color: #2F4497;}..report table.authRefData .body {	height: 150px;	overflow: auto;	width: 400px;}..report table.authRefData table{	font-size: 1em;}/* Report Styles */..pl a, .pl a:visited {	color: black;	text-decoration: none;}/* table */..report {	background-color: white;	border: 2px solid #acf;	clear: both;	color: black;	font: normal 8pt Helvetica, Arial, san-serif;	margin-bottom: 2em;}..report hr {	border: 1px solid #acf;}/* Top labels */..report th {	background-color: #acf;	color: black;	font-weight: bold;	text-align: center;}..report th.void	{	background-color: transparent;	color: #000000;	font: bold 10pt Helvetica, Arial, san-serif;	text-align: left;}..report .pl {	text-align: left;	vertical-align: top;	white-space: normal;	width: 200px;	word-wrap: break-word;}..report td.pl a.a {	cursor: pointer;	display: block;	width: 200px;}..report td.pl div.a {	width: 200px;}..report td.pl a:hover {	background-color: #ffc;}/* Header rows... */..report tr.rh {	background-color: #acf;	color: black;	font-weight: bold;}/* Calendars... */..report .rc {	background-color: #f0f0f0;}/* Even rows... */..report .re, .report .reu {	background-color: #def;}..report .reu td {	border-bottom: 1px solid black;}/* Odd rows... */..report .ro, .report .rou {	background-color: white;}..report .rou td {	border-bottom: 1px solid black;}..report .rou table td, .report .reu table td {	border-bottom: 0px solid black;}/* styles for footnote marker */..report .fn {	white-space: nowrap;}/* styles for numeric types */..report .num, .report .nump {	text-align: right;	white-space: nowrap;}..report .nump {	padding-left: 2em;}..report .nump {	padding: 0px 0.4em 0px 2em;}/* styles for text types */..report .text {	text-align: left;	white-space: normal;}..report .text .big {	margin-bottom: 1em;	width: 17em;}..report .text .more {	display: none;}..report .text .note {	font-style: italic;	font-weight: bold;}..report .text .small {	width: 10em;}..report sup {	font-style: italic;}..report .outerFootnotes {	font-size: 1em;}
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Carla Anita Kneipp,
certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of CenterPoint Energy Transition Bond Company IV, LLC (the Exchange Act periodic
reports);

2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

4. I am
responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the Servicer, and based on my knowledge and the compliance review conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and
except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the Transition Property Servicing Agreement dated as of January 19, 2012 between CenterPoint Energy Transition Bond Company IV, LLC, as
the Issuing Entity, and the Servicer, in all material respects; and

5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing
criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and
Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of
noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

In giving the
certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as Indenture Trustee.

Date: March 27, 2018



|                       |  |                                                                                                                                    
|---------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Carla Anita Kneipp
|Name:                  |  | Carla Anita Kneipp                                                                                                                 
|Title:                 |  | Vice President and Treasurer (Senior Officer in
Charge of Servicing Function) CenterPoint Energy Houston Electric, LLC, as servicer
#### § 103.38 Is there anything else for BIA or the lender to do after BIA makes payment?

When BIA pays the lender on its claim for loss, the lender must sign and deliver to BIA an assignment of rights to its loan agreement with the borrower, in a document acceptable to BIA. Immediately upon payment, BIA is subrogated to all rights of the lender under the loan agreement with the borrower, and must pursue collection efforts against the borrower and any co-maker and guarantor, as required by law.
§ 11.706 Appointment and duties of appraiser. ( a ) Upon ordering an estate to be probated, the court shall appoint a disinterested and competent person as an appraiser to appraise all of the decedent's real and personal property within the estate.
( b ) It shall be the duty of the appraiser to appraise separately the true cash value of each article or item of property within the estate, including debts due the decedent, and to indicate the appraised value of each such article or item of property set forth in the inventory of the estate and to certify such appraisal by subscribing his or her name to the inventory and appraisal.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT

TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of BioAmber Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2017 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Richard P. Eno, as President and Acting Chief Executive Officer of BioAmber Inc. (the Company), and Mario Settino, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of their knowledge the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                     |  |  |  |     |  |                                                      
|-------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | -----------------------------------------------------
|                     |  |  | 
|Date: April 30, 2018 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Richard P. Eno                                   
|                     |  |  |  |     |  | Richard P. Eno                                       
|                     |  |  |  |     |  | Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive
Officer)
|                     |  |  | 
|Date: April 30, 2018 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Mario Settino                                    
|                     |  |  |  |     |  | Mario Settino                                        
|                     |  |  |  |     |  | Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial
Officer)
#### Emmons County *vs.*Harry Gauger.

Opinion filed November 13, 1900.

(84 N. W. Rep. 1117.)

Appeal from District Court, Emmons County; *Winchester,*J.

*George M. Register*and *Cochrane & Corliss,*for appellant.

*H. A. Armstrong, Stevens & Allen,*and *F. H. Register,*for respondents.

Per Curiam.

The controlling questions in this case were involved and decided in the case of *Emmons Co.*v. *Thompson*(decided this term) 9 N. D. 598, 84 N. W. Rep. 385. The order appealed from is in all things reversed, and the District Court is directed to enter an order reversing the same, and also to enter an order denying the application made herein to vacate said judgment and tax sale, with costs of both courts to appellant.