alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 35.1**

 

**SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT**

**New Holland Credit Company, LLC**

 

The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of New Holland Credit Company, LLC (“NHCC”), as Servicer pursuant to the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of November 1, 2011 (as amended from time to time, the “Sale and Servicing Agreement”) by and among NHCC, CNH Capital Receivables LLC and CNH Equipment Trust 2011-C, does hereby certify that:

 

1.                                      NHCC is Servicer under the Sale and Servicing Agreement.

 

2.                                      The undersigned is duly authorized as required pursuant to the Sale and Servicing Agreement to execute and deliver this Certificate to the Indenture Trustee.

 

3.                                      This Certificate is delivered pursuant to Section 4.9(a) of the Sale and Servicing Agreement and Item 1123 of Regulation AB.

 

4.                                      A review of the Servicer’s activities during the 12 month period ending (and including) December 31, 2014 and of its performance under the Sale and Servicing Agreement has been made under my supervision.

 

5.                                      To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Sale and Servicing Agreement in all material respects throughout the 12 month period ending (and including) December 31, 2014.

 

6.                                      IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate this 30th day of March, 2015.

 

----

 

March 30, 2015

 

 
|   | By:    | /s/   Brett D. Davis |
|--------|--------|----------------------|
|   | Name:  | Brett   D. Davis     |
|   | Title: | President            |

 

----
IB

Union Calendar No. 48

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 928

[Report No. 106–88]

To require that the 2000 decennial census include either a general or targeted

followup mailing of census questionnaires, whichever, in the judgment

of the Secretary of Commerce, will be more effective in securing the

return of census information from the greatest number of households

possible.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 2, 1999

Mr. MILLER of Florida introduced the following bill; which was referred to

the Committee on Government Reform

APRIL 13, 1999

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union

and ordered to be printed

A BILL

To require that the 2000 decennial census include either

a general or targeted followup mailing of census questionnaires, whichever, in the judgment of the Secretary

of Commerce, will be more effective in securing the return of census information from the greatest number

of households possible.
2

•HR 928 RH

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘2000 Census Mail Out5 reach Improvement Act’’.

6 SEC. 2. SECOND MAILING REQUIRED.

7 (a) REQUIREMENT.—The Secretary of Commerce

8 shall ensure that, in taking the 2000 decennial census,

9 after the original mailing of census questionnaires, a re10 placement questionnaire shall be sent either—

11 (1) to all households included in the original

12 mailing, or

13 (2) to each household not responding to the

14 original mailing,

15 whichever, in the judgment of the Secretary, will be more

16 effective in securing the return of a completed question17 naire from the greatest number of households possible.

18 (b) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS.—In making a de19 cision under subsection (a), the Secretary of Commerce

20 shall also take into consideration such factors as the need

21 for timely and accurate information, cost, and ease of ad22 ministration.

23 (c) DECENNIAL CENSUS DEFINED.—For purposes of

24 this Act, the term ‘‘decennial census’’ means a decennial
3

•HR 928 RH

1 census of population conducted under section 141(a) of

2 title 13, United States Code.

Union Calendar No. 48

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 928

[Report No. 106–88]

A BILL

To require that the 2000 decennial census include

possible.mation from the greatest number of householdseffective in securing the return of census informent of the Secretary of Commerce, will be morecensus questionnaires, whichever, in the judgeither a general or targeted followup mailing of

APRIL 13, 1999

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the

State of the Union and ordered to be printed
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit

No. 20-10536

Summary Calendar

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

James L. Rudzavice, 

Defendant—Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

 USDC No. 4:07-CR-138-1

USDC No. 4:20-CV-505

Before Wiener, Southwick, and Duncan, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

James Rudzavice was convicted of child pornography offenses and

sentenced to 360 months in prison. United States v. Rudzavice, 586 F.3d 310, 

312-13 (5th Cir. 2009). He appeals from the district court’s denial of a motion 

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this 

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited 

circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

December 18, 2020

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 20-10536 Document: 00515679678 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/18/2020
No. 20-10536

2

for compassionate release under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A), in which he 

argued that the threat of COVID-19 in prison constituted extraordinary and 

compelling reasons for release. He asserts on appeal that he has already 

contracted COVID-19 once and fears reinfection. He also asserts that the 

district court was biased, and he seeks a remand for reconsideration by a 

different judge. 

We need not decide whether the risk of reinfection constitutes an 

extraordinary and compelling reason for compassionate release because the 

district court did not abuse its discretion by concluding that Rudzavice 

remained a danger to the safety of others and that his immediate release after 

serving less than half of his sentence would not be in the interest of justice

and would minimize the seriousness of his crimes. See United States v. 

Chambliss, 948 F.3d 691, 692-93 (5th Cir. 2020). 

The judgment is AFFIRMED. Rudzavice’s motion for appointment 

of counsel and all of his other requests for relief are DENIED.

Case: 20-10536 Document: 00515679678 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/18/2020
MICHAEL STEVE COX, 

Petitioner, 

vs. 

THE SEVENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT 

COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, IN 

AND FOR THE COUNTY OF WHITE PINE, 

Respondent. 

MICHAEL STEVE COX, 

Petitioner, 

vs. 

THE SEVENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT 

COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, IN 

AND FOR THE COUNTY OF WHITE PINE, 

Respondent. 

No. 62079 

No. 62080 

ORDER DENYING WRIT PETITIONS 

These are seven original proper person petitions for 

extraordinary relief. The petitions are not consolidated. 

Having considered these petitions and supporting documents, 

we conclude that petitioner's arguments lack merit and that our 

intervention by way of extraordinary relief is not warranted. Accordingly, 

we deny the petitions. NRAP 21(b)(1); NRAP 21(c). 

Additionally, as demonstrated by the this order, petitioner has 

filed numerous meritless proper person petitions in this court seeking 

extraordinary writ relief and has further filed a number of similarly 

meritless appeals in this court. See Cox v. McDaniel, Docket No. 60056, 

Cox v. McDaniel, Docket No. 60151, Cox v. Bannister, Docket No. 60637, 

Cox v. State, Docket No. 61322. We caution appellant that continued filing 

of such meritless petitions and appeals may result in restrictions on his 

ability to file papers in this court in forma pauperis. See Jordan v. State, 

Dept. of Motor Vehicles & Pub. Safety, 121 Nev. 44, 110 P.3d 30 (2005), 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

(0) 1947A 

2 
J. 

abrogated on other grounds by Buzz Stew, LLC v. City of N. Las Vegas, 124 

Nev. 224, 181 F'.3d 670 (2008). 

It is so ORDERED.' 

Hardesty 

c-c -Sis°7- 

Parr a guirre 

cc: Hon. James Todd Russell, District Judge 

Michael Steve Cox 

Attorney General/Carson City 

Carson City Clerk 

White Pine County Clerk 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

"In each of these writ petitions, this court has received petitioner's 

requests for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We direct the clerk of this 

court to file the May 17, 2011, and the June 28, 2011, motions in Docket 

No. 58292; the March 19, 2012, motion in Docket No. 60404; the March 19, 

2012, motion in Docket No. 60406; the March 19, 2012, motion in Docket 

No. 60407; the March 19, 2012, motion in Docket No. 60409; the November 

20, 2012, motion in Docket No. 62079; and the November 20, 2012, motion 

in Docket No. 62080. Because petitioner was granted leave to proceed in 

forma pauperis in each of these writ petitions, no action is required on 

these motions.
**
**Exhibit 15.5**

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form F-3No. 333-224206) of Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. of our reports dated March 17, 2020, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of TerraForm Power, Inc., and the effectivenessof internal control over financial reporting of TerraForm Power, Inc., included in this Amendment No. 1 of the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. for the year endedDecember 31, 2019. 

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP 

New York, New York 

March 18, 2020 
**
/* Updated 2009-11-04 *//* v2.2.0.24 *//* DefRef Styles */..report table.authRefData{	background-color: #def;	border: 2px solid #2F4497;	font-size: 1em;	position: absolute;}..report table.authRefData a {	display: block;	font-weight: bold;}..report table.authRefData p {	margin-top: 0px;}..report table.authRefData .hide {	background-color: #2F4497;	padding: 1px 3px 0px 0px;	text-align: right;}..report table.authRefData .hide a:hover {	background-color: #2F4497;}..report table.authRefData .body {	height: 150px;	overflow: auto;	width: 400px;}..report table.authRefData table{	font-size: 1em;}/* Report Styles */..pl a, .pl a:visited {	color: black;	text-decoration: none;}/* table */..report {	background-color: white;	border: 2px solid #acf;	clear: both;	color: black;	font: normal 8pt Helvetica, Arial, san-serif;	margin-bottom: 2em;}..report hr {	border: 1px solid #acf;}/* Top labels */..report th {	background-color: #acf;	color: black;	font-weight: bold;	text-align: center;}..report th.void	{	background-color: transparent;	color: #000000;	font: bold 10pt Helvetica, Arial, san-serif;	text-align: left;}..report .pl {	text-align: left;	vertical-align: top;	white-space: normal;	width: 200px;	white-space: normal; /* word-wrap: break-word; */}..report td.pl a.a {	cursor: pointer;	display: block;	width: 200px;	overflow: hidden;}..report td.pl div.a {	width: 200px;}..report td.pl a:hover {	background-color: #ffc;}/* Header rows... */..report tr.rh {	background-color: #acf;	color: black;	font-weight: bold;}/* Calendars... */..report .rc {	background-color: #f0f0f0;}/* Even rows... */..report .re, .report .reu {	background-color: #def;}..report .reu td {	border-bottom: 1px solid black;}/* Odd rows... */..report .ro, .report .rou {	background-color: white;}..report .rou td {	border-bottom: 1px solid black;}..report .rou table td, .report .reu table td {	border-bottom: 0px solid black;}/* styles for footnote marker */..report .fn {	white-space: nowrap;}/* styles for numeric types */..report .num, .report .nump {	text-align: right;	white-space: nowrap;}..report .nump {	padding-left: 2em;}..report .nump {	padding: 0px 0.4em 0px 2em;}/* styles for text types */..report .text {	text-align: left;	white-space: normal;}..report .text .big {	margin-bottom: 1em;	width: 17em;}..report .text .more {	display: none;}..report .text .note {	font-style: italic;	font-weight: bold;}..report .text .small {	width: 10em;}..report sup {	font-style: italic;}..report .outerFootnotes {	font-size: 1em;}
IV

House Calendar No. 55

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 173

[Report No. 106–144]

Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the

bill (H.R. 1141) making emergency supplemental appropriations for the

fiscal year ending September 30, 1999, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 17, 1999

Mrs. MYRICK, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution

which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

RESOLUTION

Waiving points of order against the conference report to

accompany the bill (H.R. 1141) making emergency supplemental appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1999, and for other purposes.

1 Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it

2 shall be in order to consider the conference report to ac3 company the bill (H.R. 1141) making emergency supple4 mental appropriations for the fiscal year ending Sep5 tember 30, 1999, and for other purposes. All points of

6 order against the conference report and against its consid-
2

HRES 173 RH

1 eration are waived. The conference report shall be consid2 ered as read.

House Calendar No. 55

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 173

[Report No. 106–144]

RESOLUTION

Waiving points of order against the conference reother purposes. fiscal year ending September 30, 1999, and for emergency supplemental appropriations for the port to accompany the bill (H.R. 1141) making

MAY 17, 1999

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be

printed
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

MEMORANDUM OPINION

N o. 04

- 24

- 00305

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF S.E.W. , a Child

From the 81st Judicial District Court

, Wilson County, Texas

Trial Court No. CVW

- 1500492

Honorable Jennifer Dillingham , Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Beth Watkins , Justice

Liza A. Rodriguez , Justice

Lori I. Valenzuela , Justice

Delivered and Filed: September 18, 2024

DIS MISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION

Appellant’s brief was originally due July 5, 2024 and was not filed. We granted appellant’s

first motion for extension of time, extending the deadline to August 5, 2024 , but the brief was not

filed. On August 13, 2024, we ordered appellant to file, by August 28, 2024: (1) the brief; and (2)

a written response reasonably explaining the failure to timely file a brief. In our order, we cautioned

the appellant that if she failed to timely file a brief and written response, we would dismiss the

appeal for want o f prosecution. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 38.8(a).

Appellant did not respond to our order. Because appellant has failed to timely file a brief,

this appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. See id.

PER CURIAM
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION 

WASHINGTON, DC 

Anoka Air, Inc., et al 

Complainant, 

v. FAA Docket No. 16-11-12 

Metropolitan Airports Commission 

Respondent. 

NOTICE OF EXTENSION OF TIME 

This matter is before the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) based on the abovereferenced complaint, filed in accordance with FAA Rules of Practice for Federally-Assisted 

Airport Enforcement Proceedings, 14 CFR, Part 16. Pursuant to 14 CFR, Part 16, subpart B, 

the date by which the Director's Determination will be issued in this matter is hereby 

extended to July 31,2015. 

An extension of time is necessary and appropriate for a fair and complete determination in 

this case. 

tf"l 

ctor of Airport Compliance and 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

A ' /i "11-----

I HEREBY CERTIFY that on A/)( dJ q 2015, I caused to be placed in the United 

States mail (first class mail, postage paid) a true copy of the Notice of Extension of Time 

addressed to: 

Counsel for Complainant: 

Steven M. Taber, Esq. 

Taber Law Group 

13 Atlanta 

Irvine, CA 92620 

Facsimile: (714) 707-4282 

Counsel for Respondent: 

Thomas W. Anderson, Esq. 

General Counsel 

Metropolitan Airports Commission 

6040 28th Avenue South 

Minneapolis, MN 55450 

Facsimile: (612) 726-5306 

Pablo 0. Ntiesch, Esq. 

Spiegel & McDiarmid LLP 

1333 New Hampshire Ave., NW 

Washington, DC 20036 

Facsimile: (202) 393-2866 

Copy to: 

FAA Part 16 Airport Proceedings Docket 

FAA Office of Airport Compliance and Management Analysis, AC0-1 00 

Office of Airport Compliance 

and Management Analysis
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 November 19, 2014

h1112

Order 

Clerk

November 19, 2014

147944

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 147944

COA: 317680

Wayne CC: 12-009625-FH

DERRICK PERSON,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 12, 2013 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
### §10214. Adjutants general and assistant adjutants general: reference to other officers of National Guard

In any case in which, under the laws of a State, an officer of the National Guard of that jurisdiction, other than the adjutant general or an assistant adjutant general, normally performs the duties of that office, the references in sections 12004(b)(1), 12215, 12642(c), 14507(b), 14508(h), and 14512 of this title to the adjutant general or the assistant adjutant general shall be applied to that officer instead of to the adjutant general or assistant adjutant general.

(Added Pub. L. 103–337, div. A, title XVI, §1661(a)(1), Oct. 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 2979; amended Pub. L. 111–383, div. A, title X, §1075(b)(51), Jan. 7, 2011, 124 Stat. 4371.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

Provisions similar to those in this section were contained in section 281 of this title, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 103–337, §1661(a)(2)(A).

#### Amendments

2011—Pub. L. 111–383 substituted "14508(h)" for "14508(e)".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Dec. 1, 1994, except as otherwise provided, see section 1691 of Pub. L. 103–337, set out as a note under section 10001 of this title.
#### § 457.111 Notice.

The agency shall make available to employees, applicants, participants, beneficiaries, and other interested persons such information regarding the provisions of this part and its applicability to the programs or activities conducted by the agency, and make such information available to them in such manner as the head of the agency finds necessary to apprise such persons of the protections against discrimination assured them by section 504 and this regulation.
cc: Hon. Stefany Miley, District Judge 

Marquion Sullivan 

Attorney General/Carson City 

Clark County District Attorney 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

(0) 1947A 

2
#### Eugene K. Fassett, Respondent, v. Charles H. Duryea, Appellant, Impleaded with Paris Laundry Company and Others.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Ho opinion.
### §12243. Warrant officers: suspension of laws for promotion or mandatory retirement or separation during war or emergency

In time of war, or of emergency declared after May 29, 1954, by Congress or the President, the President may suspend the operation of any provision of law relating to promotion, or mandatory retirement or separation, of permanent reserve warrant officers of any armed force.

(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 26, §599; renumbered §12243, Pub. L. 103–337, div. A, title XVI, §1662(d)(2), Oct. 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 2991.)

| Revised section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 599 | 10:600p (as applicable to reserve warrant officers).34:330g (as applicable to reserve warrant officers). | May 29, 1954, ch. 249, §18 (as applicable to reserve warrant officers), 68 Stat. 165. |
| | 34:430d (as applicable to reserve warrant officers). | |

34:330g (as applicable to reserve warrant officers).

The word "may" is substituted for the words "is authorized, in his discretion". The words "any provision of law" are substituted for the words "all or any part or parts of the several provisions of law".

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1994—Pub. L. 103–337 renumbered section 599 of this title as this section.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Delegation of Functions

Functions of the President under this section delegated to the Secretary of Defense, see section 1(4) of Ex. Ord. No. 11390, Jan. 22, 1968, 33 F.R. 841, set out as a note under section 301 of Title 3, The President.
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS 

Appeal of --

Job Options, Inc. 

Under Contract No. W91 YTV-11-C-0004 

APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT: 

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: 

ORDER 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

ASBCA No. 59506 

Mr. Jeffrey Johnson 

CEO 

Raymond M. Saunders, Esq. 

Army Chief Trial Attorney 

MAJ Cameron Edlefsen, JA 

Trial Attorney 

The dispute has been settled. The appeal is dismissed with prejudice. 

Dated: 22 September 2014 

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the 

Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 59506, Appeal of Job 

Options, Inc., rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. 

Dated: 

JEFFREY D. GARDIN 

Recorder, Armed Services 

Board of Contract Appeals
#### § 1000.48 What must a Tribe do if it does not wish to receive a negotiation grant?

A selected Tribe/Consortium may elect to negotiate without applying for a negotiation grant. In such a case, the Tribe/Consortium should notify OSG in writing so that funds can be reallocated for other grants.
### Capstone Aviation Corporation

790 Royal Saint George Dr. Ste 141#128 Naperv ille, Illinois 60563 Paul Capistrant, MBA (775) 450

- 6366

March 8 , 2015

U.S. Department of Transportation Docket Management System 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE Washington, D.C. 20590

Subject Matter: Supplement to Capstone Aviation Corporation Section 333 Petition for Exemption

– Docket ID: FAA

- 2015

- 0563

- 0001

To Whom It May Concern,

The purpose of this document is to supply additional information /supporting

documents for the original Capstone Aviation Corporation Section 333 Petition of Exemption

– Docket ID FAA

- 2015

- 0563

- 000 1 dated 03/06/2015

.

T he following supporting documentation will be used for Capstone Aviation Corporation ’ s proposed UAS operations. In addition, to the Limitations and Conditions stated in Capstone Aviation Corporation’s Section 333 Petition for Exemption

– Docket Number FAA

- 2015

- 0563

- 000 1

, the PIC will be required to perform training flights with the DJI Phantom UAS as
stated below

. The PIC must be able to demonstrate, prior to business/ commercial operations:

1. All flight maneuvers in the Phantom 2 Vision+ Pilot Training Guide V1.1

2. Have a thorough understanding of the Phantom 2 Vision+ User Manual V1.8, Open Pilot Preflight Checklist, and Academy of Model Aeronautics Nati onal Model Aircraft Safety Code.

3. P rior to the first commercial operation the PIC will be required to perform the greater of 20 flights or 20 hours of flight time in a Phantom UAS.

4. E mergency maneuvers and maintaining appropriate distances from people, vessels,

vehicles and structures.

Supporting Documentation includes: 1) Phantom 2 V ision+ Pilot Training Guide V1.1_en_ 1_of_2

2) Phantom 2 V ision+ Pilot Training Guide V1.1_en_ 2 _of_2
3) Phantom 2 Vision+ User Manual V1.8 _en_1_of_ 2
4) Phantom 2 Vision+ User Manual V1.8 _en_2 _of_ 2
5) OpenPilot Preflight Checklist

6) Academy of Model Aeronautics (AMA) Model Safety Code

For any further information, please contact: Capstone Aviation Corporation

, Attn: Paul Capistrant

Ph: 775

- 450

- 6366

Email: pcapistrant@capstoneaviation.com Address: 790 Royal Saint George Dr. Ste 141#128 Naperville, Illinois 60563