alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §14305. Establishment of promotion zones: mandatory consideration for promotion

(a) Establishment of Zone.—Before convening a mandatory promotion board under section 14101(a) of this title, the Secretary of the military department concerned shall establish a promotion zone for officers serving in each grade and competitive category to be considered by the board.

(b) Number in the Zone.—The Secretary concerned shall determine the number of officers in the promotion zone for officers serving in any grade and competitive category from among officers who are eligible for promotion in that grade and competitive category under the provisions of sections 14303 and 14304 of this title and who are otherwise eligible for promotion.

(c) Factors in Determining Number in the Zone.—The Secretary's determination under subsection (b) shall be made on the basis of an estimate of the following:

(1) The number of officers needed in that competitive category in the next higher grade in each of the next five years.

(2) In the case of a promotion zone for officers to be promoted to a grade to which the maximum years of in grade criteria established in section 14304 of this title apply, the number of officers in that competitive category who are required to be considered for selection for promotion to the next higher grade under that section.

(3) The number of officers that should be placed in the promotion zone in each of the next five years to provide to officers in those years relatively similar opportunities for promotion.

(Added Pub. L. 103–337, div. A, title XVI, §1611, Oct. 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 2935.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Oct. 1, 1996, see section 1691(b)(1) of Pub. L. 103–337, set out as a note under section 10001 of this title.
EXHIBIT 32.2



Statement of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Knight Capital Group, Inc. (the Company) for the quarter ended March 31, 2006 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), John B. Howard, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or, 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/    JOHN B. HOWARDName: John B. Howard Title:   Chief
Financial Officer Date:   May 9, 2006




This
certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
### NU M BER 13- 08- 340- CV 

## COURT OF A PP EA LS T H I R T E E N T H D I S T R I C T O F T E XAS CORPUS CHRI ST I -E DI NBURG

____ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _______ _ JER OM E D . B ROW N, A pp ellan t,
v . SGT . E. C AST RO, ETA L., A pp ellees .

____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ___ _ _ _ _ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ __ On ap pe al f rom th e 3 43rd D istrict Co urt of B ee Co un ty , T exas .

____ ____ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ __ 

## ME MOR A ND UM OP IN ION Be fo re Ju stice s R od rigu ez, Garza, a nd B en av ide s M emo rand um Opin ion Pe r Cu riam Appel lan t, Jerome D . Brow n, broug ht an appeal from a jud g ment ent ered by the 343rd D is tr ict Cour

t of Bee Cou nty , Texas, i n c ause number B- 07- 1511- CV -C

. Appel lan t has f iled a m otion t o d ismiss the app eal on g roun ds tha t the app eal is interlocu tory becau se he has not exh aust ed his admin is trati v e remedi es. The Cour t, hav ing co nsi dered2

the d ocuments o n fil e and appel lan t’ s moti on to dis mis s t he appe al, i s o f the opi nio n tha t the motion should be g ra nted. SeeT EX . R. A PP . P. 42 .1(a). App ellant ’s motio n to dism iss isg ra nted, and the a ppeal i s h ereby D ISM ISSE D. H av ing di smi ss ed th e appea l at appel lan t’ s req uest , no moti on for re hear ing w il l be ent ertai ned, and our mandatew il l is sue forthw it h. P E RC U R I A M Me moran dum Opi nio n del ivered and filed thi s t he 10t h day

of Jul y , 200 8.
#### Lloyd G. McCrum, Appellant, v. Lex Realty Company and Charles W. Frazier, Respondents.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. No opinion.'
Copyright © 2012 Boeing. All rights reserved.

Industry Meeting on COG in Lavatory

Bert BaileyMarch 7, 2012
Copyright © 2012 Boeing. All rights reserved.

Chemical Oxygen Generato
Copyright © 2012 Boeing. All rights reserved.

COG Viewed from Inside a L
Copyright © 2012 Boeing. All rights reserved.

FAA Major Releases

1 Original Airworthiness Directive AD-2011-04-09 2 Special Federal Aviation Regulation SFAR-111 3 ARC Final Report 4 FAA Policy Statement PS-ANM-25-04 5 NPRM NPRM 2012-NM-004-AD 6 Final AD 
Copyright © 2012 Boeing. All rights reserved.

Airworthiness Directive 201

 The SSI-AD was released on February 9, 2011 with a 21 d It was effective for airlines operating under CFR part 121 o

aircraft operating under CFR part 129 with over 20 seat ca

 The action required the deactivation or removal of the che

generator installed in each of the lavatory modules.

 After completion of modification the pilot of that aircraft wa

the lavatory oxygen was inactive.

 Does not include freighters, business jets, commercial – m

flight test aircraft.

 This SSI-AD did not require a change to the design of orig

manufactures .
Copyright © 2012 Boeing. All rights reserved.

Airworthiness Directive 201

 The AD 2011-04-09 was released on March 7 and becom

14, 2011 with a 21 day compliance time.

 It was effective for airlines operating under CFR part 121 o

aircraft operating under CFR part 129 with over 20 seat ca

 Does not include freighters, business jets, commercial – m

flight test aircraft.

 The action required the deactivation or removal of the che

generator installed in each of the lavatory modules.

 This SSI-AD did not require a change to the design of orig

manufactures .
Copyright © 2012 Boeing. All rights reserved.

Special Federal Aviation RegulaSFAR - 111 SFAR-111 was released on March 8, 2011 and was effect

remains so until further notice.

 Applicability of SFAR-111

– Airlines operating under CFR part 121 or – U.S. registered aircraft operating under CFR part 129 with ove

– Holder of production certificates– Applicants for airworthiness certificates– Applicants for type certificates

 Persons listed above may operate and add aircraft into op

disabled lavatory oxygen in accordance with AD 2011-04-
Copyright © 2012 Boeing. All rights reserved.

2011 Event Time Flow

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun J

Kick off 

meeting 

SSI AD Prep

SSI AD 

Released

30 Day 

Compliance 

Complete

FAA Forms ARC to Deve

Security Oxygen Requirem

2011

FAA Released 

Public Version 

AD 2011-04-09

FAA

SF AR-1111
Copyright © 2012 Boeing. All rights reserved.

Event Time Flow

Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar A

2012

FAA Comment 

Response

FAA Release NPRM of Ne

Policy Memo
Copyright © 2012 Boeing. All rights reserved.

Observations of NPR

1) Through out the ARC process the complia

been stated many times as being 4 years point second half of 2011, now 2 years is s

2) Why a new AD instead of a final rule3) This proposed AD would retain the require

2011-04-09 which would be in conflict of roxygen into the lavatories
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Carla Anita Kneipp,
certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period
covered by this report on Form 10-K of CenterPoint Energy Transition Bond Company IV, LLC (the Exchange Act periodic reports);

2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by
the Servicer, and based on my knowledge and the compliance review conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports,
the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the Transition Property Servicing Agreement dated as of January 19, 2012 between CenterPoint Energy Transition Bond Company IV, LLC, as the Issuing Entity, and the Servicer, in all material
respects; and

5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related
attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included
as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Deutsche Bank Trust Company
Americas, as Indenture Trustee.

Date: March 29, 2016



|                       |  |                                                                                                                                    
|---------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Carla Anita Kneipp
|Name:                  |  | Carla Anita Kneipp                                                                                                                 
|Title:                 |  | Vice President and Treasurer (Senior Officer
in Charge of Servicing Function) CenterPoint Energy Houston Electric, LLC, as servicer
Exhibit 31

EX-31 Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certifications.

I, Anthony
Orso, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this
report on Form 10-K of the CFCRE Commercial Mortgage Trust 2011-C2 (the Exchange Act periodic reports);

2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange
Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required
to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

4. Based on my knowledge and the
servicer compliance statements required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreements in all material
respects; and

5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports
on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to
this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:

KeyBank National Association, as Master Servicer, LNR Partners, LLC, as Special Servicer, U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee, Citibank, N.A., as
Certificate Administrator, Citibank, N.A., as Custodian, TriMont Real Estate Advisors, Inc., as Operating Advisor, and U.S. Bank National Association, as Servicing Function Participant



|                                                             
|-------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: March 25, 2016                                        
|                                                             
|/s/ Anthony Orso                                             
|                                                             
|Principal Executive Officer                                  
|(senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor)
#### Byron Wolverton and Others, Appellants, *v.*James Rogers, Respondent.

Second Department,

December 23, 1907.

Trial — misjoinder of parties plaintiff—general nonsuit improper ‘— objection by demurrer or answer essential.

In an action by several land brokers for commissions, a nonsuit as against all is not warranted merely because some of the parties plaintiff failed to prove their employment by the defendant. Where some of the plaintiffs prove their case, a general motion to dismiss should be denied.

The defense of misjoinder of parties'plaintiff must be taken by demurrer if it appear upon the face of the complaint, and if not, then by answer, or the misjoinder is waived.

Appeal by the plaintiffs, Byron Wolverton and. others, from a judgment of the Municipal Court of the city of ¡New York, borough of Brooklyn, in favor of the defendant, rendered on the 24th day of October, 1906.

*Benjamin Frindel,*for the appellants.

*Louis Ehrenberg,*for the respondent.

Gaynor, J.:

The action is for a broker’s commission on the sale of real estate. The evidence is that the defendant employed two of the plaintiffs to sell the property, that they brought him a purchaser on his terms, and that he refused to make the contract. Two other brokers are joined as plaintiffs, because they assisted the plaintiffs in getting the purchase, though not employed by the defendant. At the close of the plaintiffs’ evidence a motion to dismiss the complaint was granted. The motion was not severed as to each set of plaintiffs, but made generally against all. It is now sought to uphold the nonsuit on-the ground that “no interest in common is shown in the plaintiffs against the defendant ”. This was not a ground on which to dismiss the complaint against all. A cause of action was proved in two of them, and- the dismissal was error in respect of them. It was for the defendant to sever his motion. A complaint cannot be dismissed as to all of the plaintiffs because a *46canse of action has not been made out by some of them. A general motion to dismiss in such a case has to be denied, and should have been denied in this case *(Simar*v. *Canaday,*53 N. Y. 298).

' Furthermore, the Code of Civil Procedure allows a demurrer for a misjoinder of parties plaintiff (sec. 488, sub. 5), which was not the case formerly (Code Proc. of 1848, sec. 144), and provides • that unless the objection be taken by demurrer where it appears on the face of the complaint, or by answer where it does not, it is deemed to have been waived (Code Civ. Proc. secs. 498, 499). Not having objected by answer (for the misjoinder did not appear on the face of the complaint), the defendant was not in a position to move to dismiss because of it on the trial.

The judgment should be reversed. ■

Woodward^ Rich and Miller, JJ., concurred; Hirsohberg, P. J.,. not voting.

Judgment of the Municipal Court reversed and new trial ordered, costs to abide the event.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 152 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 152

   Recognizing the commitment and dedication of members of America's 
humanitarian relief nongovernmental organizations and private volunteer 
    organizations for their rapid and courageous response to recent 
       disasters in Central America and Kosova, and of the local 
  nongovernmental organizations and individuals in these regions with 
                            whom they work.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 27, 1999

 Mr. Porter (for himself, Mr. Gilman, Mr. Wolf, and Mr. Hall of Ohio) 
submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee 
                       on International Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Recognizing the commitment and dedication of members of America's 
humanitarian relief nongovernmental organizations and private volunteer 
    organizations for their rapid and courageous response to recent 
       disasters in Central America and Kosova, and of the local 
  nongovernmental organizations and individuals in these regions with 
                            whom they work.

    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) recognizes and commends the commitment and dedication 
        of those individuals serving in and working with 
        nongovernmental organizations and private volunteer 
        organizations of the United States in providing humanitarian 
        relief to hundreds of thousands of individuals displaced and 
        injured by the natural disasters in Central America and by the 
        Kosova conflict;
            (2) urges all Americans to join in recognizing the relief 
        workers and organizations for their commitment and dedication; 
        and
            (3) calls upon the people of the United States--
                    (A) to reflect upon the commitment and dedication 
                of the relief workers and organizations for their 
                continued work in responding to tragedies around the 
                world with great care, skill, and speed; and
                    (B) to encourage awareness of the contributions 
                that the relief workers and organizations have made to 
                help ease human suffering.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 915 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.915

                       One Hundred Sixth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

         Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,
   the sixth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-nine

                                 An Act

 
 To authorize a cost of living adjustment in the pay of administrative 
                               law judges.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PAY OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES.

    Section 5372(b) of title 5, United States Code, is amended--
        (1) in paragraph (1), by inserting ``(A)'' after ``(1)'' and by 
    striking all after the first sentence and inserting the following:
    ``(B) Within level AL-3, there shall be 6 rates of basic pay, 
designated as AL-3, rates A through F, respectively. Level AL-2 and 
level AL-1 shall each have 1 rate of basic pay.
    ``(C) The rate of basic pay for AL-3, rate A, may not be less than 
65 percent of the rate of basic pay for level IV of the Executive 
Schedule, and the rate of basic pay for AL-1 may not exceed the rate 
for level IV of the Executive Schedule.'';
        (2) in paragraph (3)(A), by striking ``upon'' each time it 
    appears and inserting ``at the beginning of the next pay period 
    following''; and
        (3) by adding at the end the following:
    ``(4) Subject to paragraph (1), effective at the beginning of the 
first applicable pay period commencing on or after the first day of the 
month in which an adjustment takes effect under section 5303 in the 
rates of basic pay under the General Schedule, each rate of basic pay 
for administrative law judges shall be adjusted by an amount determined 
by the President to be appropriate.''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 97-4354

___________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the 

* District of Nebraska.

Luis J. Garcia-Florido, *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellant. *

___________

Submitted: May 13, 1998

Filed: September 1, 1998 

___________

Before BEAM, HANSEN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Luis Garcia-Florido appeals his sentence following a plea of guilty to drug

offenses. He contends that the district court erred in refusing to grant him relief under

the safety valve provisions of the Mandatory Minimum Sentencing Reform Act, 18

U.S.C. § 3553(f) and U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 5C1.2(5). We affirm.

Under the safety-valve exception to statutory minimum sentences, a defendant

may be given a more lenient sentence within the otherwise applicable guideline range

if, among other things, the defendant "truthfully provide[s] to the Government all
-2-

information and evidence the defendant has concerning the offense or offenses that

were part of the same course of conduct or of a common scheme or plan." U.S.S.G.

§ 5C1.2(5); see also United States v. Weekly, 118 F.3d 576, 581 (8th Cir. 1996),

dissent modified, 128 F.3d 1198 (8th Cir. 1997), cert. denied, 118 S. Ct. 611 (1997).

A defendant has the burden to show, through affirmative conduct, that he has given the

government truthful information and evidence about the relevant crimes before

sentencing. See id. We review for clear error the district court's finding that GarciaFlorido did not satisfy that burden. See id.

The district court found that Garcia-Florido had not truthfully provided the

government with such information. That finding was based on Garcia-Florido's

testimony at the trial of his co-conspirator, Raul Ramirez. In our view, GarciaFlorido's testimony in the Ramirez trial strains credulity. The district judge had

presided over the Ramirez trial and had an opportunity to observe Garcia-Florido's

testimony and demeanor. We find no clear error in the district court's failure to credit

Garcia-Florido's testimony.

Accordingly, Garcia-Florido's sentence is affirmed.

A true copy.

 Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.