alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FINANCIAL
INFORMATION FOR MORRIS MATERIAL HANDLING, INC. AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1999             OCT-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-1999             NOV-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-1999             APR-30-1999
<CASH>                                           2,790                       0
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   66,524                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (3,069)                       0
<INVENTORY>                                     42,484                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               124,448                       0
<PP&E>                                          69,423                       0
<DEPRECIATION>                                (28,628)                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 300,414                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          142,422                       0
<BONDS>                                        204,097                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                             0                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     (49,045)                      0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   300,414                       0
<SALES>                                         71,849                 139,769
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                71,894                 139,916
<CGS>                                           54,442                 105,056
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   19,354                  35,287
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               7,523                  14,431
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (9,425)                (14,858)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (3,518)                 (1,065)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (12,922)                (15,896)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (12,922)                (15,896)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0                       0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0                       0


</TABLE>
§ 1000.308 What will the notice of reassumption include? The notice of reassumption under § 1000.307 will include all of the following items. In addition, if resources are available, the Secretary may offer technical assistance to mitigate the imminent jeopardy. ( a ) A statement of the reasons supporting the Secretary's finding.
( b ) To the extent practical, a description of specific measures that must be taken by the Tribe/Consortium to eliminate imminent jeopardy.
( c ) A notice that funds for the management of the trust asset, natural resource, or public health and safety found to be in imminent jeopardy may not be reallocated or otherwise transferred without the Secretary's written consent.
( d ) A notice of intent to invoke the return of property provision of the AFA.
( e ) The effective date of the reassumption if the Tribe/Consortium does not eliminate the imminent jeopardy. If the deadline is less than 60 days after the date of receipt, the Secretary must include a justification.
( f ) The amount of funds, if any, that the Secretary believes the Tribe/Consortium should refund to the Department for operation of the reassumed program. This amount cannot exceed the amount provided for that program under the AFA and must be based on such factors as the time or functions remaining in the funding cycle.
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Andina Acquisition Corporation
(the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended February 29, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1.          The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.          The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation
of the Company.





|Date: June 14, 2012
|-------------------
|                   
|                   
|                   
|                   
|                   
|                   



|Date: June 14, 2012
|-------------------
|                   
|                   
|                   
|                   
|                   
|
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS**

 

I, Brian E. Schaaf, certify that:

 

1.                                    I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Ford Credit Auto Lease Trust 2011-B (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);

 

2.                                    Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.                                    Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

 

4.                                    I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer and based on my knowledge and the compliance review conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and

 

5.                                    All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

 

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: The Bank of New York Mellon, as indenture trustee of the issuing entity, and U.S. Bank Trust National Association, as owner trustee of the issuing entity.

 

Dated March 28, 2014

 

 
|   | /s/   Brian E. Schaaf                              |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------|
|   | Brian   E. Schaaf                                  |
|   | Vice   President and Assistant Treasurer           |
|   | Ford   Motor Credit Company LLC, as Servicer       |
|   | (senior   officer in charge of servicing function) |

 

----
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Tecnoglass Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the “Report”), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1.          The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.          The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation
of the Company.



Date:  November 10, 2015



| | /s/ Jose Daes                               
| | --------------------------------------------
| | Name:  Jose Daes                            
| | Title:    Chief Executive Officer           
| | (Principal Executive Officer)               
| |                                             
| | /s/ Joaquin Fernandez                       
| | Name:   Joaquin Fernandez                   
| | Title:     Chief Financial Officer          
| | (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
IV

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 13

Authorizing the Speaker to administer the oath of office.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 6, 1999

Mr. MENENDEZ submitted the following resolution; which was considered and

agreed to

RESOLUTION

Authorizing the Speaker to administer the oath of office.

Whereas, Sam Farr, a Representative-elect from the Seventeenth District of the State of California, has been unable

from illness to appear in person to be sworn as a Member

of the House, and there being no contest or question as

to his election: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the Speaker, or deputy named by him,

2 is hereby authorized to administer the oath of office to

3 the Honorable Sam Farr at Carmel, California, and that

4 such oath be accepted and received by the House as the

5 oath of office of the Honorable Sam Farr.

Æ
### §12502. Chief and assistant chief of staff of National Guard divisions and wings in Federal service: detail

(a) The President may detail a regular or reserve officer of the Army as chief of staff, and a regular or reserve officer or an officer of the Army National Guard as assistant to the chief of staff, of any division of the Army National Guard that is in Federal service as an Army National Guard organization.

(b) The President may detail a regular or reserve officer of the Air Force as chief of staff, and a regular or reserve officer or an officer of the Air National Guard as assistant to the chief of staff, of any wing of the Air National Guard that is in Federal service as an Air National Guard organization.

(Added Pub. L. 103–337, div. A, title XVI, §1662(g)(1), Oct. 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 2995.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

Provisions similar to those in this section were contained in sections 3542 and 8542 of this title, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 103–337, §1662(g)(2).

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Dec. 1, 1994, except as otherwise provided, see section 1691 of Pub. L. 103–337, set out as a note under section 10001 of this title.
#### Elcie Jarrell v. The State.

No. 22766.

Delivered February 16, 1944.

The opinion states the case.

*Forse & Forse,*of Newton, for appellant.

*Ernest S. Góens,*State’s Attorney, of Austin, for. the State.

KRUEGER, Judge.

*15The conviction is for the sale of whisky in -a dry area. The punishment assessed is a fine of $100.00.

Appellant brings forward several complaints but we deem it necessary to discuss only the one relating to the variance between the allegation and the proof. It was charged in the complaint and information that on or about the 2nd day of October, 1943, appellant did, in Newton County, Texas, a dry area, sell whisky to Allen E. Lewis. The proof showed that the bottle which contained the liquid sold was labeled “Rum.” No other proof of any kind or character that it was whisky was introduced. Consequently there is a variance between the allegation and the proof which requires a reversal of the judgment of conviction. In support of what- we have said we refer to the following cases: Early v. State, 56 Tex. Cr. R. 61; Poston v. State, 126 S. W. 1148, 58 Tex. Cr. R. 583; Flippin v. State, 134 Tex. Cr. R. 352, (p. 355, on motion for rehearing) ; McMillan v. State, 128 Tex. Cr. R. 640; Coleman v. State, 21 Tex. Cr. App. 520 (526).

. For the error pointed out, the judgment of the trial court is reversed and the cause remanded.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
#### § 115.502 Who inherits the money in an IIM account when an account holder dies?

At the end of all probate procedures, funds remaining in a decedent's estate account will be distributed from the decedent's estate account and paid directly to or deposited into an IIM account of the decedent's heirs, beneficiaries, or other persons or entities entitled by law to receive the funds, where applicable. See 25 CFR part 15.
#### § 11.447 Maintaining a public nuisance.

A person who permits his or her property to fall into such condition as to injure or endanger the safety, health, comfort, or property of his or her neighbors, is guilty of a violation.
# C_2013289EN.01001201.xml

| 4.10.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 289/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.10.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 289/12

---

Notice of the impending expiry of certain anti-dumping measures

2013/C 289/07

1.   As provided for in Article 11(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 of 30 November 2009 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community (1), the Commission gives notice that, unless a review is initiated in accordance with the following procedure, the anti-dumping measures mentioned below will expire on the date mentioned in the table below.

1

2.   Procedure

Procedure

Union producers may lodge a written request for a review. This request must contain sufficient evidence that the expiry of the measures would be likely to result in a continuation or recurrence of dumping and injury.

Should the Commission decide to review the measures concerned, importers, exporters, representatives of the exporting country and Union producers will then be provided with the opportunity to amplify, rebut or comment on the matters set out in the review request.

3.   Time limit

Time limit

Union producers may submit a written request for a review on the above basis, to reach the European Commission, Directorate-General for Trade (Unit H-1), N-105 8/20, 1049 Brussels, Belgium (2) at any time from the date of the publication of the present notice but no later than three months before the date mentioned in the table below.

2

4.   This notice is published in accordance with Article 11(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009.

| Product | Country(ies) of origin or exportation | Measures | Reference | Date of expiry (3) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Biodiesel | United States of America | Anti-dumping duty | Council Regulation (EC) No 599/2009 (OJ L 179, 10.7.2009, p. 26) as extended to certain blends originating in the United States of America and as extended to imports consigned from Canada by Council Regulation (EU) No 444/2011 (OJ L 122, 11.5.2011, p. 12) | 11.7.2014 |

Product

Country(ies) of origin or exportation

Measures

Reference

Date of expiry (3)

3

Biodiesel

United States of America

Anti-dumping duty

Council Regulation (EC) No 599/2009 (OJ L 179, 10.7.2009, p. 26) as extended to certain blends originating in the United States of America and as extended to imports consigned from Canada by Council Regulation (EU) No 444/2011 (OJ L 122, 11.5.2011, p. 12)

11.7.2014

---

(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 51.

1

(2)  Fax +32 22956505.

2

(3)  The measure expires at midnight of the day mentioned in this column.

3

---
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration Statements:

 

(1)                                 Registration Statement (Form S-1 No. 333-204905) as filed on June 12, 2015, and amended on September 8, 2015, September 22, 2015, October 1, 2015, and October 13, 2015,

(2)                                 Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-207949) pertaining to the 2015 Omnibus Incentive Compensation Plan,

(3)                                 Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-211490) pertaining to the 2016 Equity Incentive Plan,

(4)                                 Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-211491) pertaining to the 2016 Employee Stock Purchase Plan,

(5)                                 Registration Statement (Form S-1 No. 333-213676) as filed on September 16, 2016,

(6)                                 Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-214507) as filed on November 8, 2016; and

(7)                                 Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-218252) as filed on May 26, 2017.

 

of our report dated April 2, 2018, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Cerecor Inc. included in its Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2017.

 
| /s/ Ernst &   Young LLP |
|----------------------------------|
| Baltimore, Maryland              |
| September 7, 2018           |

 

----
Exhibit 12.1


CERTIFICATION







I, Jonathan Burgin, certify that:





1.          I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of BioCancell Ltd.





2.          Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;





3.          Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;





4.          The company’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company and have:





(a)     Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;





(b)     Evaluated the effectiveness of the company’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and





(c)     Disclosed in this report any change in the company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company’s internal control over financial reporting; and





5.        The company’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the company’s auditors and the audit committee of company’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):





(a)     All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and





(b)     Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the company’s internal control over financial reporting.





Date:  April 23, 2013




/s/Jonathan Burgin
Name: Jonathan Burgin

Title: Chief Executive Officer
| (logo) Grant Thornton | Audit • Tax • Advisory

 

Grant Thornton LLP

201 South College Street

Suite 2500

Charlotte, NC 28244

 

T 704.632.3500 |
|-----------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

 

 

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

 

Board of Directors 

Trimont Real Estate Advisors, Inc.

 

We have examined management’s assertion, included in the accompanying Management’s Certification Regarding Compliance with Applicable Servicing Criteria (“Management’s Report”), that Trimont Real Estate Advisors, Inc. (the “Company”) complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB as of and for the year ended December 31, 2014, except for those criteria noted as not applicable (N/A) within Exhibit A. The transactions covered by this report are only those transactions processed by the Company in its capacity as trust, senior trust or operating advisor for the asset backed securities transactions (the “Platform”). Reference Exhibit B for the transactions covered by this examination. Management is responsible for the Company’s compliance with the applicable servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management’s assertion about the Company’s compliance with the applicable servicing criteria for the Platform based on our examination.

 

Our examination was conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company’s compliance with the applicable servicing criteria for the Platform and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing selected asset-backed transactions and securities constituting the Platform and evaluating whether the Company performed servicing activities related to those transactions and securities in compliance with the applicable servicing criteria for the period covered by this report. Accordingly, our testing may not have included servicing activities related to each asset-backed transaction or security constituting the Platform. Further, our examination was not designed to detect material noncompliance that may have occurred prior to the period covered by this report and that may have affected the Company’s servicing activities during the period covered by this report. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company’s compliance with the applicable servicing criteria.

 

In our opinion, management’s assertion that Trimont Real Estate Advisors, Inc. complied with the applicable servicing criteria identified in Exhibit A and Exhibit B as of and for the year ended December 31, 2014 for the Platform is fairly stated, in all material respects. 

 

Charlotte, North Carolina

/s/ Grant Thornton LLP

March 1, 2015