alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C.  SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of General Metals Corporation (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q/A No. 2  for the period
ended October 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Stephen Parent, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:




(1)           the
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)           the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




Dated:
January 15, 2010 .













/s/ Stephen
      ParentStephen
    ParentPresident and Chief
      Executive Officer(Principal
      Executive Officer)
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.



## United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2008-3083

ELIZABETH A. JOHNSON,

Petitioner,

v.

MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD,

Respondent,

and

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY,

Intervenor.

M. Jefferson Euchler , Law Office of M. Jefferson Eu chler, of Virginia Beach,

Virginia, argued for petitioner.

Sara B. Rearden , Attorney, Office of the General Counsel, Merit Systems Protection

Board, of Washington, DC, argued for re spondent. With her on the brief were B. Chad

Bungard , General Counsel, and Stephanie M. Conley , Acting Assistant G eneral Counsel.

Tara K. Hogan , Trial Attorney, Commercial Litigatio n Branch, Civil Division, United

States Department of Justice, of Washington, DC, for intervenor. With her on the brief

were Jeffrey S. Bucholtz , Acting Assistant Attorney General, Jeanne E. Davidson , Director,

and Martin F. Hockey, Jr. , Assistant Director. Of counsel was Louise A. Schmidt , Chief,

Civilian Personnel Branch, United States Army Legal Se rvices Agency, of Arlington,

Virginia.

Appealed from: Merit Systems Protection BoardNOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.



## United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2008-3083

ELIZABETH A. JOHNSON,

Petitioner,

v.

MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD,

Respondent,

and

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY,

Intervenor.



## Judgment

ON APPEAL from the Merit Systems Protection Board

in CASE NO(S). DC0752070338-I-1

This CAUSE having been hear d and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Per Curiam (NEWMAN, MAYER and LOURIE, Circuit Judges ).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

DATED: October 20, 2008 /s/ Jan Horbaly

Jan Horbaly, Clerk
Exhibit 23.1





Consent of Independent Registered Public Accountants



Board of Directors
Mid-Wisconsin Financial Services, Inc.
Medford, Wisconsin


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on
Form S-8 (No. 33-37264) and Form S-3 (No. 333-138229) of Mid-Wisconsin
Financial Services, Inc. of our report dated February 20, 2009, relating to the
consolidated balance sheets of Mid-Wisconsin Financial Services, Inc. and
Subsidiary as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, and the related consolidated
statements of income, changes in stockholders' equity, and cash flows for each
of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2008, which appears in
the December 31, 2008, Form 10-K of Mid-Wisconsin Financial Services, Inc.


WIPFLI LLP
Wipfli LLP


March 25, 2009
Green Bay, Wisconsin
#### Emmons County *vs.*I. P. Baker.

Opinion filed November 13, 1900.

(84 N. W. Rep. 1117.)

Appeal from District Court, Emmons County; *Winchester, J.*

*George M. Register*and *Cochrane & Corliss,*for appellant.

*F. H. Register*and *H. A. Armstrong,*for respondents.

Per Curiam.

The controlling questions in this case were involved and decided in the case of *Emmons Co.*v. *Thompson*(decided this term) 9 N. D. 598, 84 N. W. Rep. 385. The order appealed from is in all things reversed, and the District Court is directed to enter an order reversing the same, and also to enter an order denying the application made herein to vacate said judgment and tax sale, with costs of both courts to appellant.
### **CHAPTER 2013—VOLUNTARY RETIREMENT FOR LENGTH OF SERVICE**

Sec.
20601.
Officers: voluntary retirement for length of service.
20602.
Officers: computation of years of service for voluntary retirement.
20603.
Enlisted members: voluntary retirement for length of service.
20604.
Enlisted members: computation of years of service for voluntary retirement.
20605.
Applicability of other provisions of law relating to retirement.
#### § 115.417 What portion of funds in a minor's supervised account may be withdrawn under a distribution plan?

Trust money in a minor's supervised account will not be distributed without a review of other resources that may be available to meet the needs of the minor. Any trust funds of a minor that are distributed must be used for the direct benefit of the minor and in accordance with any additional limitations (*e.g.,* statutory, court order, tribal resolution, etc.) placed on the use of specific trust funds. Allowable uses may include health, education, or welfare when based upon a justified unmet need. The BIA will require receipts for expenditures of funds disbursed from a minor's account to a custodial parent, legal guardian, person who has been recognized by the BIA as having control and custody of the minor, or an emancipated minor.
#### Mrs. Ethel Burns (Wiggins) MARSHALL, Appellant, v. CAPITAL TRANSIT COMPANY, Appellee.

No. 12110.

United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit.

Argued Oct. 27, 1954.

Decided November 10, 1954.

Mr. Kent D. Thorup, Washington, D. C. , for appellant. Messrs. Joseph F. Castiello, William T. Hannon, Ralph F. Berlow and Joseph B. Calandriello, Washington, D. C., were on the brief, for appellant.

Mr. Frank F. Roberson, Washington, D. C., with whom Mr. John P. Arness, Washington, D. C., was on the brief, for appellee.

*637Before WILBUR K. MILLER, PRETTYMAN and DANAHER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The question is whether the Transit Company is liable in damages for injuries sustained by a passenger who fell in alighting from a bus which had stopped thirty inches from the curb, where there was no unusual hazard in the street but where there was an incline toward the curb for drainage purposes, substantially similar to the slope of street surfaces throughout the District.

The District Court correctly answered the question in the negative. Kieffer v. Capital Transit Co., 1954, 94 U.S.App.D.C. -, 214 F.2d 241; Hoffman v. Philadelphia Transportation Co., 1952, 369 Pa. 212, 85 A.2d 144; Greco v. Public Service Interstate Transp. Co., 1947, 135 N.J.L. 280, 51 A.2d 1; Meelhein v. Public Service Coordinated Transport Co., 1938, 121 N.J.L. 163, 1 A.2d 418.

Affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 108 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                        March 11, 1999.
    Resolved, That the following named Members be, and they are hereby, elected 
to the following standing committees of the House of Representatives:
    Committee on the Judiciary: Mr. Scarborough of Florida.
    Committee on Veterans' Affairs: Mr. Baker of Louisiana.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
#### § 161.609 Can BIA take emergency action if the rangeland is threatened?

Yes, if a permittee or any other party causes or threatens to cause immediate, significant and irreparable harm to the Navajo Nation land during the term of a permit, BIA will take appropriate emergency action. Emergency action may include trespass proceedings under subpart H, or judicial action seeking immediate cessation of the activity resulting in or threatening harm. Reasonable efforts will be made to notify the Navajo Nation, either before or after the emergency action is taken.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Avalon Holdings Corporation on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Frank Lamanna,
Chief Financial Officer of Avalon Holdings Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Avalon Holdings Corporation.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Frank Lamanna      
|Frank Lamanna          
|Chief Financial Officer
|August 12, 2005        



25
Exhibit 34.7






| |  | 
| |  | 







Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting
Firm

To the Board of Directors National Tax Search, LLC

We have examined National Tax Search,
LLC (the “Company”) compliance with the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB Servicing Criteria,
set forth in Item 1 122(d) of the Security and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB for the National Tax Search TaxQ system
(the “Platform”) as of and for the year ended December 31, 2015. The Company has determined that only certain servicing
criteria, 1122(d)(I)(ii), 1122(d)I(iv), 1122(d)2(ii), 1122(d)2(v), 1122(d)2(vi), 1122(d)2(vii), 1122(d)(4)(xi), and 11122(d)(4)(xii),
are applicable to the activities performed by it with respect to the Platform covered by this report. The Company has determined
that the remaining servicing criteria set forth in Item I 22(d) of the SEC Regulation AB are not applicable to the activities performed
by it with respect to the Platform covered by this report.

Management is responsible for the Company’s
compliance with those servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management’s assertion about the
Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria based on our examination. Our examination was conducted in accordance with
standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis,
evidence about the Company’s compliance with the applicable servicing criteria and performing such other procedures as we
considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included a selection of a sample of transactions and compliance activities
related to the Platform during the examination period and determining whether the Company processed those transactions and performed
those activities in compliance with the servicing criteria. Our testing of selected transactions and compliance activities was
limited to calculations, reports, and activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report. Our procedures
did not include determining whether errors may have occurred prior to our tests that may have affected the balances or amounts
calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report for the selected transactions or any other transactions.
We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination
on the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria.

In our opinion, management’s
assertion that the Company complied with the aforementioned servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2015 for
the Platform is fairly stated in all material respects.

/s/ Plante & Moran, PLLC

Chicago, IL

January 18, 2016
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-7656

In Re: ROBERT CALVIN CRAIG, JR.,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Error Coram Nobis.

(CA-95-182)

Submitted: March 25, 1999 Decided: March 31, 1999

Before WILKINS and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Robert Calvin Craig, Jr., Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Robert Calvin Craig, a North Carolina inmate, petitions for a

writ of error coram nobis in an effort to obtain relief from a

prefiling injunction and fine imposed because of his repeatedly

filing frivolous actions. Coram nobis is an extraordinary remedy

to be used to remedy the most fundamental errors in a conviction

after a sentence has been served. See United States v. Mandel, 862

F.2d 1067, 1075 (4th Cir. 1988). Craig’s petition does not satisfy

these criteria, and we therefore deny the petition. We deny the

motions to proceed in forma pauperis, to expedite, and to strike,

and we dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

arguments are adequately presented in the materials before the

court, and argument would not significantly aid the decisional

process.

PETITION DENIED
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO



SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual report of Ipsidy Inc. (the “Company”)
on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2018 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”), I, Philip Beck, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|Date: October 31, 2019 | /s/Philip Beck               
|---------------------- | -----------------------------
|                       | Philip Beck                  
|                       | Chief Executive Officer      
|                       | (Principal Executive Officer)
EX-34.3
(logo) Grant Thornton


Audit . Tax . Advisory

Grant Thornton LLP
201 South College Street
Suite 2500
Charlotte, NC 28244

T 704.632.3500



Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm


Board of Directors

TriMont Real Estate Advisors, Inc


We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying
Management's Certification Regarding Compliance with Applicable Servicing
Criteria ("Management's Report"), that TriMont Real Estate Advisors, Inc (the
"Company") complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission's Regulation AB as of and for the year
ended December 31, 2012, except for those criteria noted as not applicable
(N/A) within Exhibit A. The transactions covered by this report are only those
transactions processed by the Company in its capacity as trust, senior trust or
operating advisor for the asset backed securities transactions (the "Platform").
Reference Exhibit B for the transactions covered by this examination.
Management is responsible for the Company's compliance with the applicable
servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's
assertion about the Company's compliance with the applicable servicing criteria
for the Platform based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public
Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included
examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the
applicable servicing criteria for the Platform and performing such other
procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination
included testing selected asset-backed transactions and securities constituting
the Platform and evaluating whether the Company performed servicing activities
related to those transactions and securities in compliance with the applicable
servicing criteria for the period covered by this report. Accordingly, our
testing may not have included servicing activities related to each asset-backed
transaction or security constituting the Platform. Further, our examination was
not designed to detect material noncompliance that may have occurred prior to
the period covered by this report and that may have affected the Company's
servicing activities during the period covered by this report. We believe that
our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination
does not provide a legal determination on the Company's compliance with the
applicable servicing criteria.


1


(page)


In our opinion, management's assertion that Trimont Real Estate Advisors, Inc
complied with the applicable servicing criteria identified in Exhibit A and
Exhibit B as of and for the year ended December 31, 2012 for the Platform is
fairly stated, in all material respects.


Charlotte, North Carolina

/s/ Grant Thornton LLP


March 1, 2013


2
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Special Ops Community Transforming to Meet Current, Future Challenges

By Jim GaramoneDOD News

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More
### SUBCHAPTER II—[RESERVED]

Sec.
4551.
[Reserved].

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

Pub. L. 117–81, div. A, title XVII, §1701(i)(9)(B), Dec. 27, 2021, 135 Stat. 2142, generally amended the text inserted by Pub. L. 116–283, div. A, title XVIII, §1856(j), Jan. 1, 2021, 134 Stat. 4276, which added this subchapter, resulting in substitution of "[RESERVED]" for "STANDARDS AND CERTIFICATION FOR PRIVATE SECURITY CONTRACTORS" in subchapter heading and no change in item 4551.
**Exhibit 35.1**

 

**SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT**

 

**HARLEY-DAVIDSON CREDIT CORP.**

 

I, James Darrell Thomas, Vice President, Treasurer and Assistant Secretary of Harley-Davidson Credit Corp. (“HDCC”), certify that:

 

(i) a review of HDCC’s activities for the period from November 9, 2011 (the closing date of the Harley-Davidson Motorcycle Trust 2011-2 transaction subject to the requirements of Regulation AB) through December 31, 2011 (the “Reporting Period”) and of HDCC’s performance under the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of November 1, 2011 (the “Sale and Servicing Agreement”) among Harley-Davidson Motorcycle Trust 2011-2, Harley-Davidson Customer Funding Corp., HDCC, and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., has been made under my supervision; and

 

(ii) to the best of my knowledge, based on such review, HDCC has fulfilled in all material respects all of its obligations under the Sale and Servicing Agreement throughout the Reporting Period.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate in the name of and behalf of HDCC this 27th day of March, 2012.

 

 
|   |   |                                                |
|--------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                |
|   | By:    | /s/   James Darrell Thomas                          |
|   |   | James   Darrell Thomas                              |
|   |   | Vice   President, Treasurer and Assistant Secretary |
|   |   |                                                |
|   |   | Harley-Davidson   Credit Corp.                      |

 

----
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Maintainers Show Off Contingency Capabilities during Korea Flying Training 23  

By 1st Lt. Cameron Silver8th Fighter Wing Public Affairs

GWANGJU AIR BASE, Republic of Korea -- Members of the 8th Fighter Wing participated in Fiscal Year 23 Korea Flying Training ( KFT) alongside units from the 51st Fighter Wing, Osan Air Base, Republic of Korea (ROK) Air Force and U.S. Marine Corps, April 17-28, 2023. KFT 23 is a combined training event focused on tactical execution of combat missions to maintain military readiness and is part of the ROK-U.S. alliance’s routine, annual training program.Among the participants were maintainers from the 35th Fighter Generation Squadron, the dedicated maintenance unit for the 35th Fighter Squadron.Working around-the-clock in 12-hour shifts throughout the nine flying days of the exercise, the “Pantons” generated more than 115 F-16 Fighting Falcons for bilateral and joint training sorties. The 35 FGS also performed routine maintenance as necessary and ensured each mission had enough fully mission capable aircraft to meet training requirements.KFT 23 integrated U.S. and ROK forces to train for air-to-air and air-to-ground missions to ensure mutual understanding and trust between the two nations, all while increasing interoperability.

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More