alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

# RED FLAG-Alaska 23-1 to Focus on Joint, Multilateral Interoperability and Combat Readiness

Pacific Air Forces Public Affairs

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

**JTF - Micronesia Menu**

                        - JTF-M Leadership
                        - JTF-M Press Room                            - News
                          - Stories
                          More
                        - JTF-M Documents
                        - JTF-M Contact Us

# USINDOPACOM Statement on Unprofessional Intercept of U.S. Aircraft over South China Sea

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command Public Affairs

                SOUTH CHINA SEA  –              
A People's Republic of China J-16 fighter pilot performed an unnecessarily aggressive maneuver during the intercept of a U.S. Air Force RC-135 aircraft, May 26, 2023. The PRC pilot flew directly in front of the nose of the RC-135, forcing the U.S. aircraft to fly through its wake turbulence. The RC-135 was conducting safe and routine operations over the South China Sea in international airspace, in accordance with international law.

The United States will continue to fly, sail, and operate – safely and responsibly – wherever international law allows, and the U.S. Indo-Pacific Joint Force will continue to fly in international airspace with due regard for the safety of all vessels and aircraft under international law. We expect all countries in the Indo-Pacific region to use international airspace safely and in accordance with international law.

View video here:

00:30VIDEO  | 00:30 |Unprofessional Intercept of U.S. aircraft over South China Sea

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Republic of Korea – U.S. Alliance Leaders Discuss Progress of U.S. Forces Korea Transformation

By United States Forces Korea Public Affairs

 YONGSAN GARRISON, Seoul, Republic of Korea – Building on the continuing progress of recent months, Republic of Korea Ministry of Defense USFK Relocation Office and U.S. Forces Korea officials gathered at U.S. Army Garrison – Yongsan to discuss the transformation and relocation of U.S. forces on the Korean Peninsula Jan. 22.  

“These regular meetings are critical to both assess the progress of the program, but also to identify ways in which our strong Alliance can enhance the transformation process,” said Maj. Gen. James Walton, director of the USFK Transformation & Re-Stationing Directorate. “We continue to make great strides in both the Yongsan Relocation Plan and the Land Partnership Plan.” 

The Yongsan Relocation Plan relocates U.S. military elements in and around Seoul and the Land Partnership Plan agreement consolidates forces from north of Seoul to USAG-Humphreys.  

“We continue to build and finish hundreds of new facilities at USAG-Humphreys and we are moving closer to more conditions-based moves this year and next year,” Maj. Gen. Walton said. “We will continue to focus on not only the construction and unit moves, but also our readiness so we always remain ready to ‘Fight Tonight’.”

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More News
#### § 1000.273 Is there a deadline for filing FTCA claims?

Yes, claims shall be filed within 2 years of the date of accrual. (28 U.S.C. 2401).
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

# Coast Guard provides SAR planning support to Republic of Korea

By StaffU.S. Coast Guard 17th District Public Affairs Kodiak

                JUNEAU, Alaska  –              

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

pacom

articles

news

U.S. Coast Guard

ROK

SAR
#### § 117.29 Sale of improvements.

The superintendent may approve the sale of improvements on restricted Indian lands when such improvements are appraised at not more than $500 and when the owner has submitted a written request that the sale be made and a statement that the improvements can no longer be used by him. The proceeds of all such sales shall be deposited to the credit of the Indian as surplus funds. Improvements consisting of buildings, etc., located on property within the Osage villages of Pawhuska, Hominy, and Grayhorse may, upon approval of the superintendent, be disposed of to other Osage Indians. The superintendent may disburse the surplus funds of the purchaser to consummate the transaction. Sale of such improvements to non-Indian or non-Osage Indians must be approved by the Commissioner.
#### The Haverly Company, Respondent, v. William E. Nankeville and the Haverly Mastodon Minstrels, Appellants.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. No •opinion. (Ingraham, J., dissenting on the ground that there is- no proof of damage.)
### §1127. Precedence of the award of the Purple Heart

In prescribing regulations establishing the order of precedence of awards and decorations authorized to be displayed on the uniforms of members of the armed forces, the Secretary of the military department concerned shall accord the Purple Heart a position of precedence, in relation to other awards and decorations authorized to be displayed, not lower than that immediately following the bronze star.

(Added Pub. L. 98–525, title V, §553(a), Oct. 19, 1984, 98 Stat. 2532; amended Pub. L. 99–145, title V, §533, Nov. 8, 1985, 99 Stat. 634.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1985—Pub. L. 99–145 substituted "the bronze star" for "the lowest position accorded any award or decoration for valor".
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                                 658
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        7,845
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                         42,840
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    54,049
<PP&E>                                               9,250
<DEPRECIATION>                                       1,387
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      86,707
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               46,372
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                                 6
<OTHER-SE>                                          31,063
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        86,707
<SALES>                                            135,790
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   135,790
<CGS>                                              117,960
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      117,960
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    15,554
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                     775
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      1,458
<INCOME-TAX>                                           619
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                    839
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                           839
<EPS-BASIC>                                          .14
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          .14



</TABLE>
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. William H. Butler and George P. Butler, Appellants, *v.*Frederick W. Hawxhurst and Others, Composing the Board of Highway Commissioners of the Town of Oyster Bay, Respondents.

Second Department,

December 23, 1907.

Highway — obstruction of accéss to water front — mandamus.

Mandamus will lie to compel highway commissioners to remove bath houses placed on a highway above the high-water mark so as to cut off access to the water.

Appeal by the relators, William H. Butler and another, from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the Nassau. Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Nassau on the 17th day of December, 1906, denying the relators’ motion for a peremptory writ of mandamus, and dismissing an alternative writ of mandamus theretofore issued herein, and also from a judgment in favor of the defendants, entered in said clerk’s office on the 17th day of December, 1906, pursuant to such order.

This is a proceeding by residents of the town of Oyster Bay, Nassau county, to obtain a writ of mandamus to compel the commissioners of highways to remove obstructions from a public highway.

The issues raised by the return to the alternative writ were tried by the court without a jury, and final order entered for the defendants.

*Bertram L.*Kraus, for the appellants.

*George B. Stoddart,*for the respondents.

Gaynor, J.:

In 1877 the commissioners of highways made an order opening a highway now called Maple avenue down “ to.the shore or highwater mark”, *i. e.,*to the, shore of the bay called Oyster Bay, and the highway has ever since been open'and in public use. There is nothing to show that land of the town was taken along the shore above highwater mark without any notice to the town officials in the opening of such highway, as the defendants claim; nor does it appear that the town owned any land there. Above highwater mark at *66the foot of and upon the said highway several persons have erected bath houses, and this proceeding was to obtain a peremptory writ . of mandamus against the defendants, the highway commissioners, to compel them to remove such obstructions. With the obstructions- there access to the water by the said highway is. substantially cut off. A dock or landing there out into the water would be a very different thing. The final order should have been for the relators, as such a proceeding is maintainable *(People ex rel. Pumpyansky*v. Keating, 168 N. Y. 390).

The final order should be reversed, and a new' trial ordered.

Woodward, Jenks, Hooker and Bien, JJ., concurred.

Order reversed and new trial ordered, costs to abide the event.
156 So.2d 157

#### Ex parte Lamar WORKS.

3 Div. 91.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

Aug. 29, 1963.

See also 41 Ala.App. 581, 141 So.2d 537.

Lamar Works pro se.

Richmond M. Flowers, Atty. Gen., for the State.

*472LIVINGSTON, Chief Justice.

This is an original petition filed in this Court for a writ of habeas corpus by Lamar Works against William C. Holman, Warden of Kilby Prison. Petitioner is presently confined in Kilby Prison under a sentence of 20 years imposed by the Circuit Court of Etowah County, Alabama, on the 22nd day of October, 1961, for the offense of robbery.

The Attorney General of Alabama has filed a motion to strike the petition on the ground that petitioner’s remedy, if any, is not by filing an original petition for habeas corpus in the Supreme Court of Alabama.

The Attorney General’s motion must be granted on the authority of the following cases: Ex parte Burton, ante, p. 345, 155 So.2d 298; Ex parte Lee, ante, p. 343, 155 So.2d 296; Ex parte Smith, ante, p. 344, 155 So.2d 297; Ex parte Glisson, ante, p. 392, 155 So.2d 348; Ex parte Taylor, ante, p. 346, 155 So.2d 299; Ex parte Carmack, ante, p. 347, 155 So.2d 300; Ex parte Wilson, ante, p. 403, 155 So.2d 507.

The motion to strike the petition is hereby granted.

Petition stricken.

SIMPSON, MERRILL and HAR-WOOD, JJ., concur.
#### § 115.504 If you have a life estate interest in income-producing trust assets, how will you receive the income?

If you have a life estate interest in income-producing trust assets, which is earning income, OTFM will open an IIM-life estate account for you and funds will be distributed after BIA has certified ownership of the trust funds.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

# Secretary Blinken’s Trip to Papua New Guinea 

By MATTHEW MILLER

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More
Primer/Surfacer PitClearcoat PitTopcoat Pit#1 DIW Rinse#2 DIW RinseInfluent MetalsSumpTreatmentChemicalsPP(2) Pumps(3) Raw Metals Batch Treatment Tanks150,000 Gallon Capacity EachPPFlow Meter(2) PumpsGravity Settler55 Gal.DrumPolymer FeedSystemPP(2) PumpsPolymerAdditionCombined Sludge Tank35,000 Gallon CapacitySandFilterTreatedWastewaterTransferInfluentSumpPP(2) Pumps(2) Treated Effluent Tanks150,000 Gallon Capacity EachPotentialChemicalTreatmentPP(2) PumpsFlow Meter(1) Flow Equalization Tank500,000 Gallon CapacityPretreated Process Wastewaterdischarged to City of MarysvilleSanitaryEffluent“Filter Cake”Sent OffsiteSludgeDe-wateringFilterPressAnionicCationicFlow Meter(1) Recycled Water Tank30,000 Gallon CapacityIndustrialWaterRecycled WaterDistributed to Toilets(3) PumpsPPPE-Coat Tank#1 Permeate#2 Permeate#3 Permeate#4 PermeateStage 8 #4 Water RinseStage 9 #5 Water RinseStage 7 #3 Water RinseStage 6 PhosphateStage 5 Surface ConditionerStage 4 #2 Water RinseStage 3 #1 Water RinseStage 2 Main CleanStage 1 Pre-CleanBumper Paint PlantAnolyte#4 DIW Rinse#3 DIW RinseHonda of America Manufacturing, Inc.ELP-002SamplingLocationpH AdjustmentAvg.=118,465GPDChemistry of waste treatmentZn+++ NaOHZn(OH)2+ Na+Metal hydroxide sludge generationMAP & ELP FAC Industrial Wastewater Treatment Process FlowPAFACCityENVChelationofheavymetalsbyEDTA inPA Degreasermakes it verydifficult andcostlyto break the bonds,andcapture from solution asmetal hydroxide precipitate
§ 1000.47 What must a Tribe/Consortium do to receive a negotiation grant? If funds are available, a grant will be awarded to help cover the costs of preparing for and negotiating a compact and an AFA. These grants are not competitive. To receive a negotiation grant, a Tribe/Consortium must: ( a ) Be selected from the applicant pool to negotiate an AFA;
( b ) Be qualified as eligible to receive a negotiation grant in the Federal Register notice discussed in § 1000.45;
( c ) Not have received a negotiation grant within the 3 years preceding the date of the latest Federal Register announcement;
( d ) Submit a letter affirming its readiness to negotiate; and
( e ) Formally request a negotiation grant to prepare for and negotiate an AFA.
### **CHAPTER 25—ELECTROMAGNETIC WARFARE**

Sec. 1

500.
Electromagnetic Spectrum Operations Executive Committee.
500a. 2
Guidance on electromagnetic spectrum operations mission area and joint electromagnetic spectrum operations.

500b. 2
Annual report on electromagnetic spectrum operations strategy of the Department of Defense.
500c. 2
Annual assessment of budget with respect to electromagnetic spectrum operations capabilities.
500d. 2
Electromagnetic spectrum superiority implementation plan.
500e. 2
Electromagnetic Spectrum Enterprise Operational Lead for Joint Electromagnetic Spectrum Operations.
500f. 2
Evaluations of abilities of armed forces and combatant commands to perform electromagnetic spectrum operations missions.

1  Editorially supplied.

2  So in original. Item numbers 500a to 500f do not conform to section numbers 501 to 506, respectively, used in this chapter.
§ 152.32 Irrigation fee; payment. Collection of all construction costs against any Indian-owned lands within Indian irrigation projects is deferred as long as Indian title has not been extinguished. (Act of July 1, 1932 (47 Stat. 564; 25 U.S.C. 386a)). This statute is interpreted to apply only where such land is owned by Indians either in trust or restricted status. ( a ) When any person whether Indian or non-Indian acquires Indian lands in a fee simple status that are part of an Indian irrigation project he must enter into an agreement, ( 1 ) To pay the pro rata share of the construction of the project chargeable to the land,
( 2 ) To pay all construction costs that accrue in the future, and
( 3 ) To pay all future charges assessable to the land which are based on the annual cost of operation and maintenance of the irrigation system.
( b ) Any operation and maintenance charges that are delinquent when Indian land is sold will be deducted from the proceeds of sale unless other acceptable arrangements are made to provide for their payment prior to the approval of the sale.
( c ) A lien clause covering all unpaid irrigation construction costs, past and future, will be inserted in the patent or other instrument of conveyance issued to all purchasers of restricted or trust lands that are under an Indian irrigation project.

Cross Reference:
See part 159 and part 160 and cross-references thereunder in this chapter for further regulations regarding sale of irrigable lands.