alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 141.40 Proceeds of sale. ( a ) The following items shall be deducted from the proceeds of the sale of pawned items in the following order of priority: ( 1 ) The expense of advertising and conducting the sale, not to exceed ten percent (10%) of the amount loaned.
( 2 ) The principal amount of the loan, plus any accrued finance charges.
( 3 ) The finance charge calculated at the annual percentage rate of the original loan on the unpaid balance of the loan for the period from the date of default to the date of sale.
( b ) Within ten (10) days after the sale of the pledge under this section, the pledgee shall send a notice to the pledgor informing the pledgor of the date of the sale, the proceeds of the sale, the allowable costs of the sale, any additional finance charges, and the amount of any surplus realized. The pledgee shall obtain proof that the notice was delivered.
( c ) Any proceeds of the sale remaining after the deductions authorized in paragraph (a) of this section are deemed to be “surplus” and shall be paid over to the pledgor or the pledgor's estate in U.S. currency.
( d ) The sale of pledged goods and the application of the proceeds in accordance with this section extinguishes all rights of action of the pledgee for any unpaid principal or finance charge on the original loan.
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Tecnoglass Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the “Report”), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1.        The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.        The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.



|Date: April 16, 2014 |                      
|-------------------- | ---------------------
|                     | /s/ Jose Daes        
|                     | Name:                
|                     | Title:               
|                     |                      
|                     |                      
|                     | /s/ Joaquin Fernandez
|                     | Name:                
|                     | Title:               
|                     |
#### § 1000.23 How is a Tribe/Consortium admitted to the applicant pool?

To be considered for admission in the applicant pool, a Tribe/Consortium must submit an application to the Director, Office of Self-Governance, 1849 C Street NW; MS 2542-MIB; Department of the Interior; Washington, DC 20240. The application must contain the documentation required in § 1000.17.
#### § 115.501 How long will an estate account remain open?

An estate account will remain open until the funds have been distributed in accordance with the distribution and/or probate order.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

# USS Makin Island Successfully Completes Sea Trials

By Mass Communication Specialist 3rd Class (SW) Kory AlsberryUSS Makin Island (LHD 8) Public Affairs

                SAN DIEGO  –              http://www.navy.mil/submit/display.asp?story_id=78711

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT
#### § 1200.6 How could a tribe receive future income directly rather than have the government continue to collect it?

If a tribe wishes to receive future income directly, the tribe may contact a Fiduciary Trust Officer located at the agency or regional office.

[71 FR 15339, Mar. 28, 2006]
Exhibit
      32





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT
      TO


18
      U.S.C. SECTION
      1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT
      TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
      OF 2002





In
      connection with this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Ridgewood Electric Power
      Trust V (the “Trust”) for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2006, as filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
      each of the undersigned officers of the Trust hereby certifies, pursuant to
      18
      U.S.C. (section) 1350, as adopted pursuant to (section) 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:





(1)           The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.








/s/
                RANDALL D. HOLMESName:
            Randall
                D. HolmesTitle:
            Chief
                Executive Officer(Principal
                Executive Officer)Date:
            December
                20, 2007/s/
                JEFFREY H. STRASBERGName:
            Jeffrey
                H. StrasbergTitle:
            Executive
                Vice President and Chief Financial Officer(Principal
                Financial and Accounting Officer)Date:
            December
                20, 2007
§ 115.408 May a minor's supervised account have more than one address on file with the BIA? Yes, a minor's supervised account may have more than one address on file with the BIA. We request that the parent, legal guardian, or the person who has been recognized by the BIA as having control and custody of the minor, notify us of the following addresses for the minor: ( a ) The minor's residence;
( b ) The address of record where the statement of performance will be mailed;
( c ) The address where disbursement checks will be mailed or financial institution information for direct deposits of trust funds as authorized under an approved distribution plan.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-2255

HUI CHEN,

 Petitioner,

v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration 

Appeals.

Submitted: June 19, 2012 Decided: August 23, 2012

Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Gregory Marotta, LAW OFFICE OF RICHARD TARZIA, Belle Mead, New 

Jersey, for Petitioner. Stuart F. Delery, Acting Assistant 

Attorney General, Derek C. Julius, Senior Litigation Counsel, 

Glen T. Jaeger, OFFICE OF IMMIGRATION LITIGATION, Washington, 

D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Hui Chen, a native and citizen of China, petitions for 

review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) 

denying her motion to reopen. We have reviewed the 

administrative record and Chen’s contentions, and conclude that

the Board did not abuse its discretion in denying Chen’s motion. 

See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a) (2012). We accordingly deny the 

petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. See In 

re: Chen, (B.I.A. Oct. 21, 2011). We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before the court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

May 30, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

130387 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 130387 

 COA: 266285 

Macomb CC: 04-001785-FH 

JASON SCOTT ZYGAJ,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 8, 2005 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

KELLY, J., would hold this case in abeyance for People v Drohan, lv gtd 472 Mich 

881 (2005). 

p0522 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

May 30, 2006 

Clerk
#### § 115.107 Appeals.

Appeals from an action taken by an official of the Bureau of Indian Affairs may be taken pursuant to 25 CFR part 2, subject to the terms of subpart E.
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-90,212-01

IN RE GERALD AMOS, Relator

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS

CAUSE NO. 1432318A IN THE 177TH DISTRICT COURT

FROM HARRIS COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R

Relator has filed a motion for leave to file a writ of mandamus pursuant to the original

jurisdiction of this Court. In it, he contends that he filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus

in the 177th District Court of Harris County, that more than 35 days have elapsed, and that the

application has not yet been forwarded to this Court.

In these circumstances, additional facts are needed. Respondent, the District Clerk of Harris

County, is ordered to file a response, which may be made by submitting the record on such habeas

corpus application, submitting a copy of a timely filed order which designates issues to be

investigated (see McCree v. Hampton, 824 S.W.2d 578, 579 (Tex. Crim. App. 1992)), or stating that
2

Relator has not filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus in Harris County. Should the

response include an order designating issues, proof of the date the district attorney’s office was

served with the habeas application and that the 180-day time frame set out in TEX. R. APP. P.

73.4(b)(5) has not expired shall also be submitted with the response. This application for leave to

file a writ of mandamus shall be held in abeyance until Respondent has submitted the appropriate

response. Such response shall be submitted within 30 days of the date of this order.

Filed: August 21, 2019

Do not publish
#### § 115.807 Will OTFM consult with tribes about investments of tribal trust funds?

Upon the request of a tribe, OTFM will consult with the tribe annually to develop investment strategies to accommodate the cash flow needs of the tribe.
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 17 (Friday, January 25, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 5413]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-01539]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS

Agenda and Notice of Public Meetings of the Massachusetts 
Advisory Committee

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the rules and 
regulations of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights (Commission), and 
the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA), that a planning meeting of 
the Massachusetts Advisory Committee to the Commission will convene at 
12:00 p.m. (ET) on Tuesday, February 12, 2013, at the McCarter and 
English Law Office, 265 Franklin Street, Boston, MA 02110. The purpose 
of the meetings are orientation and project planning.
    Members of the public are entitled to submit written comments. The 
comments must be received in the regional office by Tuesday, March 12, 
2013. Comments may be mailed to the Eastern Regional Office, U.S. 
Commission on Civil Rights, 1331 Pennsylvania Avenue, Suite 1150, 
Washington, DC 20425, faxed to (202) 376-7548, or emailed to 
ero@usccr.gov. Persons who desire additional information may contact 
the Eastern Regional Office at 202-376-7533.
    Persons needing accessibility services should contact the Eastern 
Regional Office at least 10 working days before the scheduled date of 
the meeting.
    Records generated from this meeting may be inspected and reproduced 
at the Eastern Regional Office, as they become available, both before 
and after the meeting. Persons interested in the work of this advisory 
committee are advised to go to the Commission's Web site, 
www.usccr.gov, or to contact the Eastern Regional Office at the above 
phone number, email or street address.
    The meetings will be conducted pursuant to the provisions of the 
rules and regulations of the Commission and FACA.

    Dated in Washington, DC, on January 22, 2013.
David Mussatt,
Acting Chief, Regional Programs Coordination Unit.
[FR Doc. 2013-01539 Filed 1-24-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
```
§ 11.424 Neglect of children. ( a ) A parent, guardian, or other person supervising the welfare of a child under 18 commits a misdemeanor if he or she knowingly endangers the child's welfare by violating a duty of care, protection or support.
( b ) A parent, guardian, or other person supervising the welfare of a child under 18 commits a violation if he or she neglects or refuses to send the child to school.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-2207

BARRY J. BLUEFELD,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

BARRY S. COHEN; JOEL S. MEISEL; DAVID H. COHEN,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

Maryland, at Greenbelt. Paula Xinis, District Judge. (8:15-cv02857-PX)

Submitted: February 23, 2017 Decided: February 27, 2017

Before SHEDD and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit 

Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Barry J. Bluefeld, Appellant Pro Se. Matthew D. Matkov, SALTZ 

MATKOV PC, Wayne, Pennsylvania, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Barry J. Bluefeld seeks to appeal the district court’s 

order granting the Defendants’ motion to strike certain 

correspondence. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over 

final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory 

and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 

54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-

46 (1949). The order Bluefeld seeks to appeal is neither a 

final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. 

Accordingly, we deny the Appellees’ motions to strike and for 

sanctions, and we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. 

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
§ 1000.251 What happens when a Tribe/Consortium is suspended for substantial failure to carry out the terms of an AFA without good cause and does not correct the failure during the suspension? ( a ) Except when the Secretary makes a finding of imminent jeopardy to a physical trust asset, a natural resource, or public health and safety as provided in subpart M of these regulations a finding of substantial failure to carry out the terms of the AFA without good cause must be processed under the suspension of work provision of § 1000.244.
( b ) If the substantial failure to carry out the terms of the AFA without good cause is not corrected or resolved during the suspension of work, the Secretary may initiate a reassumption at the end of the 30-day suspension of work if an extension has not been negotiated. Any unresolved dispute will be processed in accordance with the Contract Disputes Act of 1978, 41 U.S.C. 601, *et seq.*
EXHIBIT 32



CERTIFICATION  PURSUANT  TO  18  U.S.C.  SECTION  1350  AS  ADOPTED  PURSUANT  TO  SECTION  906  OF  THE  SARBANES-OXLEY  ACT  OF  2002



In connection with the quarterly report of INTERACTIVE MULTIMEDIA NETWORK, INC. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Richard J. Verdiramo, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and,



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





Date:  November 15, 2004





By: /s/ Richard J. Verdiramo

-----------------------------------------------------

Richard J. Verdiramo, President and CEO
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Avalon
Holdings Corporation on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Timothy C. Coxson, Chief Financial Officer of Avalon Holdings
Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Avalon Holdings Corporation.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Timothy C. Coxson  
|Timothy C. Coxson      
|Chief Financial Officer
|May 11, 2011
#### § 117.15 Collections from insurance companies.

Moneys collected from insurance companies for loss or damage to restricted real or personal property shall be deposited to the credit of the Indian owner as surplus funds. Moneys so deposited to the credit of an adult Indian may, upon the written application of the Indian, be disbursed by the superintendent for the purpose of repairing or replacing the property. Moneys collected from insurance companies for loss or damage to unrestricted real or personal property shall be paid to the Indian for his unrestricted use.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# USS Savannah Successfully Completes Live-Fire Demonstration

By Lt. Zachary Anderson,Commander, Naval Surface Force, U.S. Pacific Fleet

                PACIFIC OCEAN  –              
USS Savannah (LCS 28) conducted a live-fire demonstration Oct. 24 in the Eastern Pacific Ocean utilizing a containerized launching system that fired an SM-6 missile at a designated target. The exercise demonstrated the modularity and lethality of Littoral Combat Ships and the ability to successfully integrate a containerized weapons system to engage a surface target. The exercise will inform continued testing, evaluation and integration of containerized weapons systems on afloat platforms.

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

LCS 28 LATEST NEWS

CNSP LATEST NEWS
#### F. P. NEWPORT CORPORATION, Limited, Appellant, v. Paul W. SAMPSELL, Trastee in Bankruptcy of the estate of F. P. Newport Corporation, Limited, et al., Appellees.

No. 14572.

United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.

Nov. 12, 1954.

Rehearing Denied Dec. 17, 1954.

Morris Lavine, Los Angeles, Cal., for appellant.

Norman A. Bailie, Richard A. Turner, Bailie, Turner, Lake & Sprague, Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee.

Before MATHEWS and ORR, Circuit Judges, and WIIG, District Judge.

PER CURIAM.

This purports to be an appeal by F. P. Newport Corporation, Limited, bankrupt, from a judgment affirming an order of a referee in bankruptcy. In re Newport Corp., D.C.S.D.Cal., 123 F.Supp. 95. In this court, two motions have been filed — (1) a motion of Paul W. Sampsell, trustee in bankruptcy, to dismiss the purported appeal and (2) a motion purportedly filed by the bankrupt to vacate the judgment and remand the case to the District Court. The motion to vacate and remand is denied. The motion to dismiss is granted, and the purported appeal is dismissed.