alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 11.315 Sentencing. ( a ) Any person who has been convicted in a Court of Indian Offenses of a criminal offense under the regulations of this part may be sentenced to one or a combination of the following penalties: ( 1 ) Imprisonment for a period up to the maximum permitted by the section defining the offense, but in no case for longer than one year; and
( 2 ) A fine in an amount up to the maximum permitted by the section defining the offense, but in no case greater than $5,000.
( b ) In addition to or in lieu of the penalties provided in paragraph (a) of this section, the court may require a convicted offender who has inflicted injury upon the person or property of another to make restitution or compensate the injured person by means of the surrender of property, payment of money damages, or the performance of any other act for the benefit of the injured party.
( c ) If, solely because of indigence, a convicted offender is unable to pay forthwith a money fine assessed under any applicable section, the court shall allow him or her a reasonable period of time to pay the entire sum or allow him or her to make reasonable installment payments to the clerk of the court at specified intervals until the entire sum is paid. If the offender defaults on such payments the court may find him or her in contempt of court and imprison him or her accordingly.
[58 FR 54411, Oct. 21, 1993, as amended at 73 FR 39861, July 11, 2008]
OFFICE OF THE ATrORNEY GENERAL OF m AUSTIN

EoEorable E. k!. County fud:tor Shermn, Tern.8 Dear Sir: 

## !Wtencre

“h owns8 lot and

for the !.!ech house end 16 cond deratl

as to ?ðer s&h wart is cztitled to record rnon’s Civil Ctat’utes,

trust, rr~echsnlcls llor? contract, vendor’s lien, oondltjoml soles costract ezd all lr.stmclente of a similar ntture :?hhch are file& or recorded in tb Gffice of tfie County Clerk under the Registration L~WOor thi8stat2; provided that POtax shell be levied on lcatrumms securira finaz!ount Of ?%+o Hundred (i$?CO.OO)Doll&r:, or IBEX. hfttr theHonorable B. A!.Khitsacrt, Page 8

tfftotivt dato of t.hls hot, exctpt sa hereinafter provldcd, no such Instrums&, shall be filed or recorded by any County Clerk in this State until t!!arc has b’een offl-itd ~,CJ such bstrurrent stsaps In sccordsnoe ‘i;lth the provisions 0: tkia section; provfdlng furz!!cr that stoulo the lnstmzent fllcd !n the ofrlco cf the County Clerk be EOCUrity of 6n obligation that hrs property ?ledgcd as securlt~ In 3 ?totc or ?tetos other than Texb8, t&o tax atill tc .bascd upon tho rsssocablo case value oi cl1 ?rogartnledCsd in Texas In the progcrtion that sold property in Toxas beers to ths tot@ vcluo of t:io ;=operty securin? the obligetlcn; md, provided further that, txocpt aa to rcnewsls or ertcnsIoris oi aocmd interest, the provlslons or t&la sectIon shsll not s~ply to ?nstrumrits EIven in rcne;iol or cxttnsions of lnatru?mts ‘thtretofort staged, under the provIi:o~:s of tilt Act or ttc ono slccndcd hereby, bnd shall not apply to instrum&s &ven in the refundlna of existing b&nda or oblIgetIons where the praccdl~~~: Instrumnt of security ~3s stazzgcd In eccordar:cc witi? this Act or the one b3lendCdbvreby; ;?rovided- further that th$ tax levied In thla kot s&l1 e::rly to only one lnatru-cnt , the 0%~of the grestest donminatfcn, where sever31 Instruxmts arc c3ctczqorahi

‘eously cxccLttd to secure one obl:g.stion; azd provided furt&r thet v:hsnonoc stbzpcd as 

### provided hc:cln, 3x1lnstrumont. my barecorded in any nur,bcr 0r counties in thte Ststc without again beIn% bostazqcd. * * *- The faots prtresentcd to us show that Us mtchsnlo*b llca waorelesoad, end ws prosuzcc that tht oblICetIon sccurcd by such lien V:P.R also rcloaotd. This neegatlv~a the VEXpression whloh otherwise z&q,t& obtained thst the V@ndor’a llcn note was given In cxttcslon or rcnowal of the zachan.!.cb lion note. 3.3the facts are roleted to ~a the deed should be ataqtd in accordencc v4th the cbovc Act.
APPROVED

JUN20, 1940 (3) Gtrold C. Dmn 

### Ycnmsverytruly ATl’O?QJEY

G.WR?hLOFTZXAS

BY (8) Glenn B. Lewis

Assistant
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 958

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to restore the nonapplicability

of private contracts for the provision of Medicare benefits.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 3, 1999

Mr. KLECZKA (for himself, Mr. RANGEL, Mr. DINGELL, Mr. STARK, Mr.

WAXMAN, Mr. MCDERMOTT, Mr. CARDIN, Mr. BARRETT of Wisconsin,

Mr. FRANK of Massachusetts, Mr. FORD, Ms. PELOSI, Mr. BORSKI, Ms.

BROWN of Florida, Mr. SANDERS, Ms. DELAURO, Ms. KILPATRICK, Mr.

HINCHEY, Mr. PALLONE, Mr. TOWNS, Ms. MILLENDER-MCDONALD, Mr.

THOMPSON of Mississippi, Ms. RIVERS, Mr. GREEN of Texas, Mr. DAVIS

of Florida, Mr. SERRANO, Mrs. JONES of Ohio, and Mr. SANDLIN) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways

and Means, and in addition to the Committee on Commerce, for a period

to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee

concerned

A BILL

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to restore

the nonapplicability of private contracts for the provision

of Medicare benefits.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 958 IH

1 SECTION 1. RESTORATION OF NONAPPLICABILITY OF PRI2 VATE CONTRACTS FOR THE PROVISION OF

3 MEDICARE BENEFITS.

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1802 of the Social Secu5 rity Act (42 U.S.C. 1395a(b)) is amended by striking sub6 section (b), as added by section 4507(a) of the Balanced

7 Budget Act of 1997, and inserting the following new sub8 section:

9 ‘‘(b) PROHIBITION ON PRIVATE CONTRACTS.—A pro10 vision of any contract, agreement, or other arrangement

11 that provides for waiver of the claims submission require12 ment under paragraph (4) of section 1848(g), for the

13 waiver of the billing limitation described in paragraphs (1)

14 and (2) of such section, or for both, is invalid and not

15 enforceable.’’.

16 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—

17 (1) Section 1862(a) of the Social Security Act

18 (42 U.S.C. 1395y(a)) is amended—

19 (A) by striking paragraph (19); and

20 (B) by redesignating paragraphs (20) and

21 (21) as paragraphs (19) and (20), respectively.

22 (2) Subsection (b) of section 4507 of the Bal23 anced Budget Act of 1997 (relating to report) is re24 pealed.

25 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

26 subsection (a) and (b)(1) shall apply to items and services
3

•HR 958 IH

1 furnished on or after the date of the enactment of this

2 Act, without regard to when a contract or other arrange3 ment relating to the provision of such items or services

4 may have been entered into.

Æ
EXHIBIT 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with the Annual Report of Ameri Metro, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended July 31, 2015 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:  1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.  3. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.  Date: November 16, 2015By:/s/ Debra MathiasDebra MathiasChief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the

Atlantic and Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the Court of any formal errors so that corrections may be made before the bound volumes go to press.

DISTRIC T OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS

No. 20

- BG

- 380

IN RE WILLIAM F. BURTON

20 20 D DN 1 0 8

A Member of the Bar of the District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Bar Reg istration No. 431812

BEFORE: Thompson and Deahl

, Associate Judge s , and Nebeker , Senior Judge

.

O R D E R (FILED

— August 27, 2020)

On consideration of the certified order from the state of Virginia suspending respondent from the practice of law in that jurisdiction by consent for a period of

one year and one day with reinstatement conditioned on satisfying the imposed

conditions ; this court’s June 2 2 , 2020

, order suspending respondent pending

resolution of t his matter and directing h im to show cause why reciprocal discipline should not be imposed; and the statement of Disciplinary Counsel wherein he requests that this court impose a substantially different discipline and require a showing of fitness for reinstatement ; and no response having been filed by respondent ; and it appearing respondent has not f iled his D.C. Bar R. XI, §14 (g) affidavit, it is

ORDERED that William F. Burton is hereby suspended from the practice of

law in the District of Columbia for a period of one year and one day with reinstatement contingent on a showing of fitness and compliance with the conditions imposed by the state of Virginia

. See D.C. Bar R. XI, § 11(c)(4) . Respondent’s extended neglect of his client, his numerous instances of dishonesty, as well as his failure to cooperate with both the state of Virginia a nd this jurisdiction inNo. 20

- BG

- 380

discip linary investigations establish a serious doubt that respondent is fit to practice

law ; thereby supporting the imposition of a fitness requirement prior to

reinstatement. See, e.g., In re Thompson , 195 A.3d 64, 64

- 65 (D.C. 2018) (respondent’s continued failure to cooperate with disciplinary investigations may be considered when imposing discipline); In re Cater , 887 A.2d 1, 24 (D.C. 2015) (discussing the cons iderations for imposing a fitness requirement). It is

FURTHER ORDERED that for purposes of reinstatement respondent’s suspension will not begin to run until such time as he files an affidavit that fully complies with the requirements of D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14(g).

PER CURIAM
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN RE:

APPOINTMENT TO INTERBRANCH 

COMMISSION FOR GENDER, RACIAL,

AND ETHNIC FAIRNESS

:

:

:

:

:

NO. 590

JUDICIAL ADMINISTRATION DOCKET

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 23rd day of January, 2023, Brooke Chung Scicchitano, Esquire, 

Philadelphia, is hereby appointed as a member of the Interbranch Commission for 

Gender, Racial, and Ethnic Fairness for a term expiring December 31, 2024.
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification

 

I, James Darrell Thomas, certify that:

 

1.              I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Harley-Davidson Motorcycle Trust 2011-2 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);

 

2.              Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.              Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

 

4.              I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer and, based on my knowledge and the compliance reviews conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement; and

 

5.              All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

 

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated party: The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A.

 
|             | HARLEY-DAVIDSON   MOTORCYCLE TRUST 2011-2 |
|------------------|-------------------------------------------|
|             |                                      |   |   |
|             |                                      | By: | Harley-Davidson   Credit Corp.,   as Servicer |
|             |                                      |   |   |
|             |                                      | By: | /s/   James Darrell Thomas |
|             |                                      |   | James   Darrell Thomas |
|             |                                      |   | Vice   President, Treasurer and Assistant Secretary   (senior officer in charge of the servicing function) |
|             |                                      |   |   |
|             |                                      |   |   |
| March   25, 2014 |                                      |   |   |

 

----
#### § 1000.84 Does a Tribe/Consortium have the right to include provisions of Title I of Pub. L. 93-638 in an AFA?

Yes, under Pub. L. 104-109, a Tribe/Consortium has the right to include any provision of Title I of Pub. L. 93-638 in an AFA.
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 88 (Wednesday, May 7, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 26204-26205]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-10378]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS

Agenda and Notice of Public Meeting of the Maine Advisory 
Committee

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the rules and 
regulations of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights (Commission), and 
the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA), that a briefing meeting of 
the Maine Advisory Committee to the Commission will convene at 12:00 
p.m. (EST) on Monday, June 2, 2014, at Lewiston City Hall in the City 
Council Chambers located at 27 Pine Street, Lewiston, ME, 04240. The 
purpose of the briefing meeting is to hear from government officials, 
advocates, and other experts on the issue of human trafficking in 
Maine.
    Members of the public are entitled to submit written comments. The 
comments must be received in the regional office by Wednesday, July 2, 
2014. Comments may be mailed to the Eastern Regional Office, U.S. 
Commission on Civil Rights, 1331 Pennsylvania Avenue, Suite 1150, 
Washington, DC 20425, faxed to (202) 376-7548, or emailed to Melanie 
Reingardt at ero@usccr.gov. Persons who desire additional information 
may

[[Page 26205]]

contact the Eastern Regional Office at 202-376-7533.
    Persons needing accessibility services should contact the Eastern 
Regional Office at least 10 working days before the scheduled date of 
the meeting.
    Records generated from this meeting may be inspected and reproduced 
at the Eastern Regional Office, as they become available, both before 
and after the meeting. Persons interested in the work of this advisory 
committee are advised to go to the Commission's Web site, 
www.usccr.gov, or to contact the Eastern Regional Office at the above 
phone number, email, or street address.
    The meeting will be conducted pursuant to the provisions of the 
rules and regulations of the Commission and FACA.

    Dated April 29, 2014.
David Mussatt,
Acting Chief, Regional Programs Coordination Unit.
[FR Doc. 2014-10378 Filed 5-6-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
```
Exhibit 15.2





July 26, 2017



Ms Jyoti Deshpande
Chief Executive Officer
Eros International Plc
Fort Anne
South Quay
Douglas
Isle of Man IM1 5PD



Re: Consent to use of extracts and reference to FICCI-KPMG
Indian Media and Entertainment Industry Reports by Eros International Plc (the "Company")



Dear Ms. Deshpande,



Reference is hereby made to the Federation of Indian Chambers
of Commerce and Industry ("FICCI")-KPMG Indian Media and Entertainment Industry Report 2017 ("2017 Report")
, ("FICCI")-KPMG Indian Media and Entertainment Industry Report 2016 ("2016 Report") , ("FICCI")-KPMG
Indian Media and Entertainment Industry Report 2015 ("2015 Report"), the FICCI-KPMG Indian Media and Entertainment Industry
Report 2014 ("2014 Report"), the FICCI-KPMG Indian Media and Entertainment Industry Report 2013 ("2013 Report"),
the FICCI-KPMG Indian Media and Entertainment Industry Report 2012 ("2012 Report"), the FICCI-KPMG Indian Media and Entertainment
Industry Report 2011 ("2011 Report"), the FICCI-KPMG Indian Media and Entertainment Industry Report 2010 ("2010
Report") and the FICCI-KPMG Indian Media and Entertainment Industry Report 2009 ("2009 Report", and together with
2010 Report, 2011 Report, 2012 Report, 2013 Report, 2014 Report, 2015 Report, 2016 Report and 2017 the "Reports").



We hereby consent to the inclusion of our name, the Reports
and their contents or extracts of the Reports in any document issued by the Company and / or any of its subsidiaries, including
but not restricted to Form 20-F filed as Annual Report for the Financial Year ended March 31, 2017 pursuant to section 13 or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and any other documents that may be filed, submitted or used in connection with SEC filings.



We further confirm that we have, where required, obtained
requisite consent in relation to any information used by us in the Reports.



Yours Sincerely,



/s/ Leena Jaisani

(Leena Jaisani)







Industry's Voice for Policy Change
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-6860

GEORGE BERNARD WISCHHUSEN, JR., Petitioner - Appellant, versus PATRICK CONROY, Warden; ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF MARYLAND, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District ofMaryland, at Baltimore. Frederic N. Smalkin, District Judge. (CA99-347-S) Submitted: December 20, 1999 Decided: January 5, 2000 Before WIDENER, MURNAGHAN, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. George Bernard Wischhusen, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Ann Norman Bosse, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: George Bernard Wischhusen, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254(West 1994 & Supp. 1999). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly,we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal substantially on the reasoning of the district court. See Wischhusen v. Conroy , No. CA-99-347-S (D. Md. June 2, 1999). We dispense withoral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Jane Jones, Appellant.

— Judgment of conviction affirmed. All concurred, except Kruse and Robson, JJ., who dissented.
**Exhibit 13.2** 

 

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERUNDER SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

 

    	 Pursuantto 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Can-fiteBioPharmaLtd. (the “Company”) hereby certifies to such officer’s knowledge that:

 

     	(i)    	theaccompanying Annual Report on Form 20-F of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2015 (the “Report”) fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

    	(ii)   	theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operationsof the Company.

 

Dated: March 31, 2016

 

/s/ Mott Farbstein ____

Motti Farbstein

Chief Operating and Financial Officer

 

The foregoing certification is beingfurnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and is not being filed for the purposes of Section18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference to any filing of the Company,whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Joey Sealy, Appellant.

[823 NYS2d 149]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Charles J. Tejada, J.), rendered November 25, 2003, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of two counts of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a persistent violent felony offender to an aggregate term of 14 years to life, unanimously affirmed.

The court improvidently exercised its discretion in admitting evidence that, while questioning defendant and preparing to issue him a summons for disorderly conduct, the police discovered that there was an outstanding warrant for his arrest, since the prejudicial effect of this testimony outweighed its probative value *{see People v Resek,*3 NY3d 385 [2004]). Mention of the warrant was not necessary to complete the narrative or establish the propriety of the police conduct, since the warrant was not the basis for defendant’s lawful arrest for possession of a weapon, and since the trial evidence independently explained the sequence of events leading to that arrest. In any event, it appears that there was no valid warrant, and the jury should at least have been so informed. We nevertheless find the error to be harmless *(see People v Crimmins,*36 NY2d 230 [1975]). There was overwhelming evidence linking defendant to the weapon, and his present arguments to the contrary are highly speculative. Concur—Andrias, J.R, Friedman, Marlow, Nardelli and Sweeny, JJ.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Credit Union Administration

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Mary Rupp, Secretary of the Board, Telephone: 703-518-6304. 

Mary Rupp, 

Board Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 2011-357 Filed 1-7-11; 4:15 pm] 

BILLING CODE P