alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Con Edison is not in favor of increases in the mandatory efficiency requirements for liquid filled

network distribution transformers.

Con Edison has over 20,000 liquid filled network transformers installed in underground vaults.

In many cases these units fit with little to no room to spare in the vault. Also, in areas like Ma nhattan

where the underground infrastructure is highly congested there is no room to install a new larger vault

or to expand existing vaults. An increase in the minimum efficiency requirements for liquid filled

transformers will result in an increase in size in the transformer. For the reasons previously mentioned

this will have an extremely adverse impa ct on Con Edison’s customers. In some cases defective

transformers may not be able to be replaced. In other cases vaults will need to be enlarged or a new

vault will be required. The average cost to enlarge a vault at Con Edison is $90,000.

Con Edison net work distribution feeders are subject to backfeed conditions. A backfeed in a

network is an operating problem. Occasionally, a network protector will fail to open when the feeder is

taken out of service for maintenance work. When this occurs, the feeder remains alive from the

network although it is dee nergized at the supply generating station or substation. Under this condition,

the network secondary mains that supply the backfeeding transformer and the network feeder may

experience an overvoltage condition. Con Edison installs shunt reactors to limit backfeed overvoltages

to safe values for customer and company equipment. An increase in ne twork transformer efficiency

may result in lower magnetizing kVA and thus require Con Edison to install additional shunt reactors

where they were not previously required. The installation cost associated with a new shunt reactor

varies between $400,000 and $590,000.

The costs outlined above

‐ which would ultimately be passed on to our ratepayers

– would far

outweigh any costs savings associated wi th reduced energy waste and must be considered.
EXHIBIT 23.1





Consent
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm





The Board of Directors
Lipocine
Inc.:



We consent to the
incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (No. 333-199093, No. 333-190897, No. 333-197421 and No. 333-191695)
on Forms S-3 and S-8 of Lipocine Inc. of our report dated March, 11 2015, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of
Lipocine Inc. as of December 31, 2014 and 2013, and the related consolidated statements of
operations and comprehensive loss, stockholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended
December 31, 2014, which report appears in the December 31, 2014 annual report on Form 10-K of Lipocine Inc.







Salt Lake City, Utah

April 22, 2015
# C_2013368EN.01001101.xml

| 17.12.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 368/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.12.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 368/11

---

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the TFEU

Cases where the Commission raises no objections

(Text with EEA relevance)

2013/C 368/05

| Date of adoption of the decision | 31.10.2013 |
| --- | --- |
| Reference number of State Aid | SA.37484 (13/N) |
| Member State | Poland |
| Region | Poland | Article 107(3)(a) |
| Title (and/or name of the beneficiary) | Przedłużenie mapy pomocy regionalnej na lata 2007–2013 do dnia 30 czerwca 2014 r. |
| Legal basis | Projekt rozporządzenia Rady Ministrów zmieniającego rozporządzenie w sprawie ustalenia mapy pomocy regionalnej |
| Type of measure | Scheme | — |
| Objective | Regional development |
| Form of aid | Other — The notification refers to the prolongation of the existing regional aid map. All forms of aid are possible. |
| Budget | — |
| Intensity | — |
| Duration (period) | 31.12.2013-30.6.2014 |
| Economic sectors | All economic sectors eligible to receive aid |
| Name and address of the granting authority | Polska/Poland |
| Other information | — |

Date of adoption of the decision

31.10.2013

Reference number of State Aid

SA.37484 (13/N)

Member State

Poland

Region

Poland

Article 107(3)(a)

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

Przedłużenie mapy pomocy regionalnej na lata 2007–2013 do dnia 30 czerwca 2014 r.

Legal basis

Projekt rozporządzenia Rady Ministrów zmieniającego rozporządzenie w sprawie ustalenia mapy pomocy regionalnej

Type of measure

Scheme

—

Objective

Regional development

Form of aid

Other — The notification refers to the prolongation of the existing regional aid map. All forms of aid are possible.

Budget

—

Intensity

—

Duration (period)

31.12.2013-30.6.2014

Economic sectors

All economic sectors eligible to receive aid

Name and address of the granting authority

Polska/Poland

Other information

—

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

http://ec.europa.eu/competition/elojade/isef/index.cfm

---
§ 150.103 What services does the LTRO perform to maintain the record of title? The LTRO is responsible for performing the following services to maintain the record of title: ( a ) Recording title documents submitted by an Agency, Region, or OHA;
( b ) Providing certified copies of the title documents in the record of title in accordance with applicable law;
( c ) Examining the record of title and certifying the findings of title examinations;
( d ) Providing certified and uncertified Title Status Reports;
( e ) Preparing, maintaining, and providing land status maps;
( f ) Providing and certifying probate inventory reports; and
( g ) Providing other services and reports based upon the information in the record of title.
### §1185. Rights and procedures

(a) Under regulations prescribed by the Secretary of Defense, each officer required under section 1181 of this title to show cause for retention on active duty—

(1) shall be notified in writing, at least 30 days before the hearing of his case by a board of inquiry, of the reasons for which he is being required to show cause for retention on active duty;

(2) shall be allowed a reasonable time, as determined by the board of inquiry, to prepare his showing of cause for his retention on active duty;

(3) shall be allowed to appear in person and to be represented by counsel at proceedings before the board of inquiry; and

(4) shall be allowed full access to, and shall be furnished copies of, records relevant to his case, except that the board of inquiry shall withhold any record that the Secretary concerned determines should be withheld in the interest of national security.

(b) When a record is withheld under subsection (a)(4), the officer whose case is under consideration shall, to the extent that the interest of national security permits, be furnished a summary of the record so withheld.

(Added Pub. L. 96–513, title I, §110, Dec. 12, 1980, 94 Stat. 2874.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Sept. 15, 1981, but the authority to prescribe regulations under this section effective on Dec. 12, 1980, see section 701 of Pub. L. 96–513, set out as an Effective Date of 1980 Amendment note under section 101 of this title.
§ 166.311 Is an Indian agricultural resource management plan required? ( a ) Indian agricultural land under the jurisdiction of a tribe must be managed in accordance with the goals and objectives in any agricultural resource management plan developed by the tribe, or by us in close consultation with the tribe, under the AIARMA.
( b ) The ten-year agricultural resource management and monitoring plan must be developed through public meetings and completed within three years of the initiation of the planning activity. Such a plan must be developed through public meetings, and be based on the public meeting records and existing survey documents, reports, and other research from federal agencies, tribal community colleges, and land grant universities. When completed, the plan must: ( 1 ) Determine available agricultural resources;
( 2 ) Identify specific tribal agricultural resource goals and objectives;
( 3 ) Establish management objectives for the resources;
( 4 ) Define critical values of the tribe and its members and provide identified holistic management objectives; and
( 5 ) Identify actions to be taken to reach established objectives.
( c ) Where the regulations in this subpart are inconsistent with a tribe's agricultural resource management plan, we may waive the regulations under part 1 of this title, so long as the waiver does not violate a federal statute or judicial decision or conflict with our general trust responsibility under federal law.
#### W. F. Martin v. The State.

No. 22740.

Delivered February 2, 1944.

The opinion states the case.

*Jimmie Cunningham,*of Lubbock, for appellant.

*Ernest S. Goens,*State’s Attorney, of Austin, for the State.

HAWKINS, Presiding Judge.

Conviction is for receiving stolen property, knowing it to have been so stolen; punishment assessed at two years in the penitentiary.

Apparently appellant has been released pending appeal upon a purported appeal bond which is fatally defective. In the first place, it fails to recite that appellant had been *convicted*of a felony as is required by the provisions of Articles 817 and 818, C. C. P., but recites only that appellant stood *charged*with a felony. In form the bond is for appearance for trial rather than *613pending appeal and is insufficient. Doddy v. State, 91 Tex. Cr. R. 634, 240 S. W. 555; Lynch v. State, 102 Tex. Cr. R. 638, 279 S. W. 271; Wall v. State, 110 Tex. Cr. R. 116, 7 S. W. (2d) 958

In the second place, the bond in question bears the approval of the sheriff only, whereas Art. 818, C. C. P., requires the approval of both the sheriff and the trial judge. Golle v. State, 93 Tex Cr. R. 233, 246 S. W. 1040. Pages of other authorities will be found in the Cumulative Pocket Part of Vol. 3, Vernon’s Ann. Tex. C. C. P., under Art. 818.

The appeal is dismissed.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21-7388

JOHNATHON KELLY,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

WARDEN J. C. STREEVAL,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at 

Roanoke. Michael F. Urbanski, Chief District Judge. (7:21-cv-00382-MFU-JCH)

Submitted: January 20, 2022 Decided: January 25, 2022

Before WILKINSON, DIAZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Johnathon Kelly, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Johnathon Kelly seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing without 

prejudice his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition for lack of jurisdiction. We dismiss the appeal for 

lack of jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was not timely filed. 

When the United States or its officer or agency is a party in a civil case, the notice 

of appeal must be filed no more than 60 days after the entry of the district court’s final 

judgment or order, Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(B), unless the district court extends the appeal 

period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5) or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 

4(a)(6). “[T]he timely filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional 

requirement.” Bowles v. Russell, 551 U.S. 205, 214 (2007).

The district court entered its order of dismissal on July 8, 2021. Kelly filed the 

notice of appeal on September 9.*

 Because Kelly failed to file a timely notice of appeal or 

to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we dismiss the appeal. 

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

DISMISSED

* For the purpose of this appeal, we assume that the date appearing on Kelly’s notice 

of appeal is the earliest date Kelly could have delivered the notice to prison officials for 

mailing to the court. Fed. R. App. P. 4(c)(1); Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266, 276 (1988).
#### The STATE OF MONTANA ex rel LARRY LYNN BLAKNEY, Relator, *v.*The DISTRICT COURT OF the FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT of the State of Montana IN AND FOR the COUNTY OF MISSOULA, and the HONORABLE JUDGE JOEL G. ROTH presiding, Respondent.

*548No. 13908.

Aug. 2, 1977.

566 P.2d 1128.

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

IT IS ORDERED that the petition for writ of supervisory control or other appropriate writ is denied without prejudice.

The petitioner’s right to a preemptory right for substitution of judge is available.

SHEA, Justice.

I would grant an adversary hearing on the petition to review the decision refusing to remove Judge Brownlee for cause. I recognize that petitioner has a right still remaining to peremptorily remove Judge Brownlee by filing a motion for substitution of judge. However, while it is exceedingly difficult to establish a challenge for cause, particularly when one district judge is ruling on another judge’s qualifications to sit on a particular case, I believe the hearing record amply supports a finding that Judge Brownlee’s animosity towards defense counsel would prevent him from giving the defendant a fair trial.

Events which have transpired since Judge Roth’s ruling refusing the disqualification demonstrate that Judge Brownlee has no intention of being fair to defense counsel, and when a judge is not fair to defense counsel he is also not being fair to the client whom such counsel represents.

Another problem which this case represents is the strong likelihood that the county attorney in filing this case before Judge Brownlee, deliberately provoked the very problems that have come before us. There is no question that county attorneys effectively exercise peremptorily challenges to judges by a careful handling of the calendar, in effect preventing certain judges from sitting on the case. This Court should look into this entire problem and put it in a perspective so that the rights of both parties are balanced. At present the county attorney effectively controls much of the pre*549liminary maneuvering which can be so instrumental in determining whether justice is or will not be granted in a particular case. Defense counsel should not be at this disadvantage.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-14-00449-CV

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE – DIVISION OF WORKERS’

COMPENSATION,

Appellant

v.

Ronald MENSCH,

Appellee

From the 73rd Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2010-CI-02326

Honorable Barbara Hanson Nellermoe, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARION, JUSTICE ANGELINI, AND JUSTICE CHAPA

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s Order Denying Plea to 

the Jurisdiction filed by the Texas Department of Insurance, Division of Workers’ Compensation

is REVERSED and judgment is RENDERED dismissing Ronald Mensch’s claims against the 

Texas Department of Insurance, Division of Workers’ Compensation.

For good cause, costs of appeal are assessed against the party that incurred them. TEX. R.

APP. P. 43.4.

SIGNED January 14, 2015.

_____________________________

Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA

Present: Chief Judge Moon, Judges Willis and Bray Argued at Norfolk, Virginia

LARRY RAMIREZ MILLER

v. Record No. 1986-93-1

COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA MEMORANDUM OPINION * BY and JUDGE JERE M. H. WILLIS, JR. JUNE 13, 1995 LARRY RAMIREZ MILLER

v. Record No. 2091-93-1

COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA

FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH Edward W. Hanson, Jr., Judge

George H. Yates for appellant. Michael T. Judge, Assistant Attorney General (James S. Gilmore, III, Attorney General, on brief), for appellee.

The judgments of the trial court are affirmed.

I. Miller contends that the trial court erred in instructing the jury that the self-inculpatory testimony of his brother, Robert Miller, could not be used by the Commonwealth in prosecuting charges against Robert. Miller further contends that the trial court erred in instructing the jury that the testimony of Robert's wife, Cheryl, could not be used by the Commonwealth

* Pursuant to Code § 17-116.010 this opinion is not designated for publication.- 2 - in prosecuting charges against Robert. When the two questioned instructions were proposed by the Commonwealth, the following dialogue occurred between the court

and defense counsel: MR. YATES (defense counsel): I had a couple other objections, Your Honor. Mr. Alberi has gone back and now wants the court to instruct the jury in his testimony witnesses committed one or more crimes. Unless that witness was testifying in his own behalf, his testimony in this trial cannot be used as evidence against him. That is quoting right from a statute. It is the law. THE COURT: Are you objecting to it? MR. YATES: I'm objecting to it, Your Honor. THE COURT: What basis? I think that is a proper instruction because it deals with the credibility of your witness. The jury should know that. MR. YATES: All right, Your Honor. There is a marital privilege instruction here. THE COURT: Right. I think that affects the credibility of another one of your witnesses. I'm going to give that also.

At no time did defense counsel state any ground for his objection to either instruction. Therefore, we will not consider on appeal arguments challenging the correctness of those instructions.

Rule 5A:18. We find no cause to invoke the ends of justice exception to the application of Rule 5A:18. The two instructions were correct statements of the law and properly addressed the credibility of

the witnesses.

II.- 3 - Miller contends that because his malicious wounding conviction was the basis for the revocation of the suspension of a previous sentence, that revocation should be reversed. Because we find no error in the malicious wounding conviction, we find no error in the revocation of the suspension of Miller's earlier

sentence. The judgments of the trial court are affirmed.

Affirmed

.
§ 15.1 What is the purpose of this part? ( a ) This part contains the procedures that we follow to initiate the probate of the estate of a deceased person for whom the United States holds an interest in trust or restricted land or trust personalty. This part tells you how to file the necessary documents to probate the estate. This part also describes how probates will be processed by the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA), and when probates will be forwarded to the Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) for disposition.
( b ) The following provisions do not apply to Alaska property interests: ( 1 ) Section 15.202(c), (d), (e)(2), (n), and (o); and
( 2 ) Section 15.401(b).
[73 FR 67278, Nov. 13, 2008, as amended at 76 FR 7505, Feb. 10, 2011]
§ 162.567 When will a WSR lease be effective? ( a ) A WSR lease will be effective on the date that we approve the lease, even if an appeal is filed under part 2 of this chapter.
( b ) The lease may specify a date on which the obligations between the parties to the lease are triggered. Such date may be before or after the approval date under paragraph (a) of this section.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Ronald Reagan Carrier Strike Group Operates with Japan and Republic of Korea

Commander, Task Force (CTF) 70 Public Affairs

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access to publicationsin the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging and locatorservices, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications (CGP). Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event that publicationsare no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****�Necesita dinero para launiversidad? resumen sobre la ayuda federal para estudiantes.**
 
2012_13 | 2015_16
 
SuDoc:ED 1.2:C 68/15/SPAN./
Item Number:0455-B-02 (online)
CGP systemNumber:001036039
 
November 27, 2017
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 956 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 956

 To designate the new hospital bed replacement building at the Ioannis 
  A. Lougaris Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center in Reno, 
                   Nevada, in honor of Jack Streeter.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 3, 1999

  Mr. Gibbons (for himself and Ms. Berkley) introduced the following 
     bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the new hospital bed replacement building at the Ioannis 
  A. Lougaris Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center in Reno, 
                   Nevada, in honor of Jack Streeter.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF HOSPITAL BED REPLACEMENT BUILDING.

    The hospital bed replacement building under construction at the 
Ioannis A. Lougaris Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center in 
Reno, Nevada, is hereby designated as the ``Jack Streeter Building''. 
Any reference to that building in any law, regulation, map, document, 
record, or other paper of the United States shall be considered to be a 
reference to the Jack Streeter Building.
                                 <all>
```