alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 6.4 Monthly list of sections affected.

A monthly list of sections of the Code of Federal Regulations affected shall be separately published on a cumulative basis during each calendar year. The list shall identify the sections of the Code specifically affected by documents published in the Federal Register during the period it covers.
#### § 111.2 Enrolling non-full-blood children.

Where an Indian woman was married to a white man prior to June 7, 1897, and was at the time of her marriage a recognized member of the tribe even though she left it after marriage and lived away from the reservation, the children of such a marriage should be enrolled—and, also in the case of an Indian woman married to a white man subsequent to the above date but who still maintains her affiliation with the tribe and she and her children are recognized members thereof; however, where an Indian woman by marriage with a white man after June 7, 1897, has, in effect, withdrawn from the tribe and is no longer identified with it, her children should not be enrolled. In case of doubt all the facts should be submitted to the Bureau of Indian Affairs, Washington, D.C., for a decision.
# C_2013347EN.01000101.xml

| 28.11.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 347/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.11.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 347/1

---

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the TFEU

Cases where the Commission raises no objections

(Text with EEA relevance)

2013/C 347/01

| Date of adoption of the decision | 22.10.2013 |
| --- | --- |
| Reference number of State Aid | SA.36775 (13/N) |
| Member State | Spain |
| Region | Pais Vasco | Mixed |
| Title (and/or name of the beneficiary) | Ayudas a la reestructuración y relanzamiento de empresas en crisis/PYME/BIDERATU |
| Legal basis | Borrador de Decreto XXX/2013 por el que se establecen ayudas destinadas a la reestructuración y relanzamiento de empresas en crisis |
| Type of measure | Scheme | — |
| Objective | Restructuring firms in difficulty, SMEs |
| Form of aid | Reimbursable grant |
| Budget | | Overall budget: EUR 18 000 000 |

Date of adoption of the decision

22.10.2013

Reference number of State Aid

SA.36775 (13/N)

Member State

Spain

Region

Pais Vasco

Mixed

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

Ayudas a la reestructuración y relanzamiento de empresas en crisis/PYME/BIDERATU

Legal basis

Borrador de Decreto XXX/2013 por el que se establecen ayudas destinadas a la reestructuración y relanzamiento de empresas en crisis

Type of measure

Scheme

—

Objective

Restructuring firms in difficulty, SMEs

Form of aid

Reimbursable grant

Budget

Overall budget: EUR 18 000 000

| | Annual budget: EUR 6 000 000 |
| --- | --- |

Annual budget: EUR 6 000 000

Intensity

50 %

Duration (period)

Until 31.12.2015

Economic sectors

Manufacturing

Name and address of the granting authority

| Dpto. de Desarrollo Económico y Competitividad Gobierno Vasco |
| --- |
| C/ Donostia-San Sebastián, 1 |
| 01010 Vitoria Gasteiz |
| ESPAÑA |

Dpto. de Desarrollo Económico y Competitividad Gobierno Vasco

C/ Donostia-San Sebastián, 1

01010 Vitoria Gasteiz

ESPAÑA

Other information

—

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

http://ec.europa.eu/competition/elojade/isef/index.cfm

---
§ 150.205 What are the minimum requirements for recording a title document? ( a ) A title document must include the following information to be recorded in the record of title, except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section: ( 1 ) A legal description of the Indian land encumbered by the title document and, if available, the tract number;
( 2 ) The signatures of the parties to the document;
( 3 ) Proper traditional in-person notarization or other in-person acknowledgment of the signatures of the parties, if applicable;
( 4 ) Signature and citation to the authority of the approving official, if applicable; and
( 5 ) Approval date.
( b ) If the title document reflects a transaction that was deemed approved under a statute or regulation providing that a transaction is deemed approved after a certain period of time without Secretarial action to approve or deny, then, at a minimum, the title document must include the following items: ( 1 ) A legal description of the Indian land encumbered by the title document and, if required, the tract number;
( 2 ) The signatures of the parties to the document;
( 3 ) Proper acknowledgement or authentication of the signatures of the parties, if applicable; and
( 4 ) A citation to the statutory or regulatory authority for the transaction to be deemed approved.
#### § 1000.147 Can the terms and conditions in a non-BIA AFA be amended during the year it is in effect?

Yes, terms and conditions in a non-BIA AFA may be amended during the year it is in effect as agreed to by both the Tribe/Consortium and the Secretary.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED June 28, 2004 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-41226 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus PEDRO ZARCO FLORES, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. C-03-CR-73-1

-------------------- Before JOLLY, WIENER, and PICKERING, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Pedro Zarco Flores (“Flores”) appeals his guilty-plea conviction and sentence for possession of more than five kilograms of cocaine with intent to distribute, a violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) and (b)(1). Flores contends that the district court clearly erred in denying him a “safety valve” departure under U.S.S.G. § 5C1.2. Although the basic outline of Flores’s story of how he obtained the truck that was used to deliver 5.58 kilograms of marijuanaNo. 03-41226 -2- appears believable, his answers to some of the district court’s specific questions about this matter suggests that he was not being entirely forthcoming about his role in the offense. After reviewing the record, we conclude that the district court did not clearly err in determining that Flores’s testimony about his role in the offense was not fully credible or “truthful.”
See U.S.S.G. § 5C1.2(a)(5) (Nov. 2002); United States v. Ridgeway , 321 F.3d 512, 516 (5th Cir. 2003). For the first time on appeal, Flores maintains that the sentencing scheme of 21 U.S.C. § 841 is facially unconstitutional in light of Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466, 490 (2000). As Flores concedes, his argument is foreclosed by this court’s decision in United States v. Slaughter , 238 F.3d 580, 582 (5th Cir. 2000). Flores raises the issue only to preserve it for possible further review. The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> BD
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Consolidated Statement of Income and Consolidated Statement of Financial
Condition in the Company's quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly
period ended March 31, 2000 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to
such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                         449,379
<RECEIVABLES>                                  235,796
<SECURITIES-RESALE>                                  0
<SECURITIES-BORROWED>                                0
<INSTRUMENTS-OWNED>                          1,079,553
<PP&E>                                          37,915
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,891,271
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<PAYABLES>                                     352,709
<REPOS-SOLD>                                    10,278
<SECURITIES-LOANED>                                  0
<INSTRUMENTS-SOLD>                             892,265
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,222
<OTHER-SE>                                     634,797
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,891,271
<TRADING-REVENUE>                              487,045
<INTEREST-DIVIDENDS>                             8,642
<COMMISSIONS>                                    4,695
<INVESTMENT-BANKING-REVENUES>                        0
<FEE-REVENUE>                                    9,428
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,162
<COMPENSATION>                                 175,141
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                216,940
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     216,940
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   136,532
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.12
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.08


</TABLE>
#### § 115.500 When is an estate account established?

An estate account is established when we receive notice of an account holder's death.
# I .I

! I 

### i i I 36TH DISTRICT 715 FARNUM BUILDING P.O. BOX 30036 LANSING, Ml 48909·7536 PHONE: (517) 373·7946 TOLL-FREE: (866) 305-2136 

## JOHN MOOLENAAR VICE-CHAIRMAN OF APPROPRIATIONS MICHIGAN SENATE
FAX: (517) 373-2678 senjmoolenaar@senate.michigan.gov

www.SenatorJohnMoolenaar.com

Mr. Dennis DeVany Chief, Essential Air Service Division Office ofAviation Analysis DepartmentofTransportation 1200 NewJersey Avenue SE Washington, D.C. 20590
Dear Mr. DeVany: June 4, 2012 APPROPRIATIONS, VICE CHAIR SUBCOMMITTEES:

DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY HEALTH, CHAIR AGRICULTURE, VICE CHAIR CAPITAL OUTLAY STANDING COMMITTEES:

VETERANS, MILITARY AFFAIRS AND HOMELAND SECURITY, CHAIR OUTDOOR RECREATION AND TOURISM REDISTRICTING

(./'1 I am writing you to lend my support of SkyWest Airlines' proposal to provide air service for Alpena, Michigan, as a replacement fortheir current airservice. Local air service that provides an effective connection to the national and international air transportation system is essential tothe economic wellbeing and growth ofAlpena. Itallows citizens of the 

### city of Alpena and the surrounding areas, easy access to air travel for both business and leisure activities. Italso brings those from otherareas ofthe state and country

### to the area to helpstimulatethe

<. • economy. The SkyWest proposal offers a 50-seat regional jet with the Delta brand and code, as well as service to the Delta hubs located in Detroit and Minneapolis. This proposal represents a sound option for retaining local air service long-term, and building airtraffic so thatgovernment subsidies can eventually be reduced oreliminated. Once again, I support SkyWest Airlines' replacement proposal to provide air service to Alpena County Regional Airport. I urge the Department of Transportation to please consider SkyWest Airlines when choosing acompanyto provide essential airservice to Alpena,

State Senator

REPRESENTING: ALGONA • ALPENA • CRAWFORD • GLADWIN • IOSCO • MIDLAND • MONTMORENCY

# j~**--------------~~---~-o-G-EM_A_w_·_o_sc_o_o_A_·_o_T_s_EG_o~--~------------------·**
Exhibit 33.2




Management’s Assertion on Compliance with Regulation AB


(Citibank, N.A.)









Management's Assertion of Compliance






Management of the Agency and Trust division of Citibank, N.A. (or “Company”) is responsible for assessing compliance with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission.









Management has determined that the servicing criteria in Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB are applicable in regard to the servicing platform as of and for the period as follows:









Platform:  Publicly-issued (i.e., transaction-level reporting initially required under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) automobile loan or lease-backed securities serviced by Nissan Motor Acceptance Corporation issued on or after January 1, 2006 for which the Company provides trustee and paying agent services (the “Platform”).









Applicable Servicing Criteria:  All servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d), to the extent required by Item 1122(d) servicing criteria in regards to the activities performed by the Company with respect to the Platform as to any transaction, except for the following criteria: 1122(d)(1)(i)-1122(d)(1)(iv), 1122(d)(2)(i), 1122(d)(2)(iii), 1122(d)(2)(v)-1122(d)(2)(vii), 1122(d)(3)(i) and 1122(d)(4)(i)-1122(d)(4)(xv), which management has determined are not applicable to the activities the Company performs with respect to the Platform (the “Applicable Servicing Criteria”).  With respect to the Platform, servicing criterion 1122(d)(3)(ii) is applicable only as it relates to remittances.




Period:  Twelve months ended March 31, 2015 (the “Period”).









With respect to the Platform as of and for the Period, the Company’s management provides the following assertion of compliance with respect to the Applicable Servicing Criteria:




·
The Company’s management is responsible for assessing the Company’s compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.




·
The Company’s management has assessed the Company’s compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.  In making this assessment, management used the criteria set forth by the Securities and Exchange Commission in paragraph (d) of Item 1122 of Regulation AB.




·
Based on such assessment, the Company has complied, in all material respects, with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.




KPMG LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report with respect to management’s assertion of compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria as of and for the Period.




CITIBANK, N.A.









By: /s/ Karen Montbach


Its: Managing Director




Dated: May 29, 2015
#### § 161.303 How long is a permit valid?

After its initial issuance, each grazing permit is valid for one year beginning on the following January 1. All permits will be automatically renewed annually if the permittee is in compliance with all applicable laws including tallies and permit requirements.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan



### February 27, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice


### 132495 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan 

### PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices



### v SC: 132495 COA: 271277 Wayne CC: 05-007765-01 ANTHONY ELLIS, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal the September 22, 2006 order of the Court of Appeals is consider ed, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

p0220 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

February 27, 2007

Clerk
§ 17.4 Procedure and timing for emergency publication. ( a ) Each agency requesting publication on the emergency schedule shall briefly describe the emergency and the benefits to be attributed to immediate publication in the Federal Register. The request must be made by letter.
( b ) The Director of the Federal Register shall assign a document to the emergency schedule whenever the Director concurs with a request for that action and it is feasible.
( c ) Each document assigned to the emergency schedule shall be published as soon as possible.
( d ) Each document assigned to the emergency schedule for publication will be filed for public inspection on the working day before publication unless emergency filing for public inspection is also requested.
[37 FR 23608, Nov. 4, 1972, as amended at 54 FR 9680, Mar. 7, 1989]
#### § 10.5 Where can I find the policies and standards for the administration, operation, services, and physical plant/construction of Indian country detention, community residential, and holding facilities?

The Bureau of Indian Affairs, Department of the Interior, maintains a manual of policies and procedures called the *Bureau of Indian Affairs Manual (BIAM).* The chapter 69 BIAM titled “Indian Country Detention Facilities and Programs,” contains the BIA's policies, procedures, and standards for detention and holding programs in Indian country. The standards for the programs within the *BIAM* are in handbook format for easy field reference and use. Copies of the chapter 69 *BIAM* and handbooks may be obtained from the Director, Office of Law Enforcement Services.

[61 FR 34374, July 2, 1996; 61 FR 65473, Dec. 13, 1996]
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Steven C. Bierman, certify that:

 

1.             I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of CNH Equipment Trust 2011-C (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);

 

2.             Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.             Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

 

4.             I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer and based on my knowledge and the compliance review conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and

 

5.             All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

 

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas.

 
| March 29,   2012 |   |                                                             |
|-----------------------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                  |   |                                                             |
|                  |   |                                                             |
|                  | By:    | /s/   Steven C. Bierman                                          |
|                  | Name:  | Steven   C. Bierman                                              |
|                  | Title: | President   (senior officer in charge of the servicing function) |

 

----
### SUBCHAPTER III—NON-JUDICIAL PUNISHMENT

| Sec. | Art. | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 815. | 15. | Commanding officer's non-judicial punishment. |
H. Res. 129

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

March 24, 1999.

Resolved,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF SELECT COMMITTEE.

Section 2(f)(1) of House Resolution 5, One Hundred

Sixth Congress, agreed to January 6, 1999, is amended by

striking ‘‘April 1, 1999’’ and inserting ‘‘April 30, 1999 (or,

if earlier, the date on which the Select Committee completes

its activities)’’.

Attest:

Clerk.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsSmart Microsystems with Photonic Element and Their Applications to Aerospace PlatformsThe need to make manufacturing, operation, and support of airborne vehicles safer and more efficient forces engineers and scientists to look for lighter, cheaper, more reliable technologies. Light weight, immunity to EMI, fire safety, high bandwidth, and high signal fidelity have already made photonics in general and fiber optics in particular an extremely attractive medium for communication purposes. With the fiber optics serving as a central nervous system of the vehicle, generation, detection, and processing of the signal occurs at the peripherals that include smart structures and devices. Due to their interdisciplinary nature, photonic technologies cover such diverse areas as optical sensors and actuators, embedded and distributed sensors, sensing schemes and architectures, harnesses and connectors, signal processing and algorithms. The paper includes a brief description of work in the photonic area that is going on at NASA, especially at the Glenn Research Center (GRC).Document ID20010016866Acquisition SourceGlenn Research CenterDocument TypePreprint (Draft being sent to journal)AuthorsAdamovsky, G.*(NASA Glenn Research Center Cleveland, OH United States)*Lekki, J.*(NASA Glenn Research Center Cleveland, OH United States)*Sutter, J. K.*(NASA Glenn Research Center Cleveland, OH United States)*Sarkisov, S. S.*(Alabama Agricultural and Mechanical Coll. Normal, AL United States)*Curley, M. J.*(Alabama Agricultural and Mechanical Coll. Normal, AL United States)*Martin, C. E.*(Adams-Brown Services, Inc. Huntsville, AL United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 7, 2013Publication DateDecember 1, 2000Subject CategoryOpticsReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.15:210607NASA/TM-2000-210607E-12567Meeting InformationMeeting: Smart Materials and MEMSLocation: MelbourneCountry: AustraliaStart Date: December 13, 2000End Date: December 15, 2000Sponsors:International Society for Optical EngineeringFunding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 704-30-53PROJECT: RTOP 334-10-00CONTRACT_GRANT: NCC3-736PROJECT: RTOP 242-90-0BCONTRACT_GRANT: NASA Order C-79299Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType20010016866.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024