alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the
annual report of NV5 Holdings, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), we, Dickerson Wright, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, and Michael P. Rama, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each certify, to the best of our knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: April 1, 2013



/s/ Dickerson WrightDickerson Wright Chairman,
Chief Executive Officer, and President


Date: April 1, 2013



/s/ Michael P. RamaMichael P. Rama Vice
President & Chief Financial Officer


This certification accompanies this Annual Report on Form 10-K pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by NV5 Holdings, Inc. for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act). Such
certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that NV5 Holdings, Inc. specifically incorporates it by reference.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to NV5 Holdings, Inc. and will be retained by
NV5 Holdings, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
§ 1000.44 What happens if there are insufficient funds to meet the Tribal requests for planning/negotiation grants in any given year? If appropriated funds are available but insufficient to meet the total requests from Tribes/Consortia: ( a ) First priority will be given to Tribes/Consortia that have been selected from the applicant pool to negotiate an AFA; and
( b ) Second priority will be given to Tribes/Consortia that require advance funds to meet the planning requirement for entry into the self-governance program.
§ 142.5 Who determines the rates and conditions of service of the Alaska Resupply Operation? The general authority of the Assistant Secretary—Indian Affairs to establish rates and conditions for users of the Alaska Resupply Operation is delegated to the Area Director. ( a ) The Manager must develop a tariff that establishes rates and conditions for charging users. ( 1 ) The tariff must be approved by the Area Director.
( 2 ) The tariff must be published on or before March 1 of each year.
( 3 ) The tariff must not be altered, amended, or published more frequently than once each year, except in an extreme emergency.
( 4 ) The tariff must be published, circulated and posted throughout Alaska, particularly in the communities commonly and historically served by the resupply operation.
( b ) The tariff must include standard freight categories and rate structures that are recognized within the industry, as well as any appropriate specialized warehouse, handling and storage charges.
( c ) The tariff must specify rates for return cargo and cargo hauled between ports. ( 1 ) The rates and conditions for the Bureau, other Federal agencies, the State of Alaska and its subsidiaries must be the same as that for Native entities.
( 2 ) Different rates and conditions may be established for non-Indian and non-Native commercial establishments, if those establishments do not meet the standard in § 142.4(c) and no other service is available to that location.
#### § 115.804 Will we account to a tribe for those trust funds the tribe receives through direct pay?

No, under the Trust Reform Act we are only responsible for accounting for those trust funds received into, and maintained by, the Department's trust funds management system.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

# Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson Army, Air Force Leaders Enrich Joint Partnership

By Sgt. Daniel Love

                JOINT BASE ELMENDORF-RICHARDSON, Alaska  –              

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

JOINT BASE ELMENDORF-RICHARDSON

Alaska

pacom

news

articles
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 234 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                          July 1, 1999.
    Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in order to 
consider the conference report to accompany the bill (H.R. 775) to establish 
certain procedures for civil actions brought for damages relating to the failure 
of any device or system to process or otherwise deal with the transition from 
the year 1999 to the year 2000, and for other purposes. All points of order 
against the conference report and against its consideration are waived. The 
conference report shall be considered as read.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
Second Department,

November, 2006

(November 8, 2006)

#### Rosa Aronov, Appellant, v Regency Gardens Apartments Corp. et al., Respondents.

[823 NYS2d 542]

In an action to recover damages for wrongful death and conscious pain and suffering, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Grays, J.), dated June 29, 2005, which granted the defendant’s motion pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (5) to dismiss so much of the plaintiffs cause of action as sought to recover damages for wrongful death.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, with costs, as the plaintiff is not aggrieved by the order appealed from *(see*CFLR 5511).

CFLR 3211 (a) permits a party to move, on certain enumerated grounds, “for judgment dismissing one or more causes of action asserted against him [or her].” The defendants here moved to dismiss, as time-barred, only so much of the plaintiffs single cause of action as sought to recover damages for wrongful death. In disposing of the motion, the order appealed from articulated the Supreme Court’s determination in sufficient detail *(see*CFLR 2219), and thus made clear that so much of the plaintiffs cause of action as sought to recover damages for her decedent’s conscious pain and suffering was not dismissed. Rather, upon dismissal, that portion of the cause of action which sought to recover damages for wrongful death was effectively *405severed from that portion of the cause of action which sought to recover damages for conscious pain and suffering *(see Tow v Moore,*24 AD2d 648, 649 [1965]; *Forse v Turner,*55 Misc 2d 810, 812 [1968]; *cf. Zivian v McNulty,*136 AD2d 547, 548 [1988]; *see also Behren v Papworth,*30 NY2d 532 [1972]; *Sirlin Plumbing Co. v Maple Hill Homes,*20 NY2d 401, 402-403 [1967]; *but cf. Burke v Crosson,*85 NY2d 10, 16 [1995]). Accordingly, so much of the cause of action as sought to recover damages for conscious pain and suffering remains viable, and the plaintiff is not barred from litigating it. In light of the foregoing, and because the plaintiff did not register opposition to the dismissal of so much of her cause of action as sought to recover damages for wrongful death, the plaintiff is not aggrieved by the order appealed from *(see*CPLR 5511; *Whiteman v Yeshiva & Mesivta Torah Temimah,*255 AD2d 378, 379 [1998]; *Ciaccio v Germin,*138 AD2d 664, 665 [1988]). Ritter, J.P., Goldstein, Rivera and Spolzino, JJ., concur.
#### § 115.412 Will child support payments be accepted for deposit into a minor's supervised account?

The Secretary will not accept child support payments for deposit into a minor's supervised account.
§ 162.428 Must a business lease provide for compensation reviews or adjustments? ( a ) For a business lease of tribal land, unless the lease provides otherwise, no periodic review of the adequacy of compensation or adjustment is required if the tribe states in its tribal certification or authorization that it has determined that not having compensation reviews and/or adjustments is in its best interest.
( b ) For a business lease of individually owned Indian land, unless the lease provides otherwise, no periodic review of the adequacy of compensation or adjustment is required if: ( 1 ) If the term of the lease is 5 years or less;
( 2 ) The lease provides for automatic adjustments; or
( 3 ) We determine it is in the best interest of the Indian landowners not to require a review or automatic adjustment based on circumstances including, but not limited to, the following: ( i ) The lease provides for payment of less than fair market rental;
( ii ) The lease is for religious, educational, recreational, cultural, or other public purposes;
( iii ) The lease provides for most or all of the compensation to be paid during the first 5 years of the lease term or before the date the review would be conducted; or
( iv ) The lease provides for graduated rent or non-monetary or various types of compensation.
( c ) If the conditions in paragraph (a) or (b) of this section are not met, a review of the adequacy of compensation must occur at least every fifth year, in the manner specified in the lease. The lease must specify: ( 1 ) When adjustments take effect;
( 2 ) Who can make adjustments;
( 3 ) What the adjustments are based on; and
( 4 ) How to resolve disputes arising from the adjustments.
( d ) When a review results in the need for adjustment of compensation, the Indian landowners must consent to the adjustment in accordance with § 162.012, unless the lease provides otherwise.
### **CHAPTER 253—RAPID ACQUISITION PROCEDURES**

Sec.
3601.
Procedures for urgent acquisition and deployment of capabilities needed in response to urgent operational needs or vital national security interest.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior chapter 253 "EMERGENCY AND RAPID ACQUISITIONS", as added by Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, §801(a), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1828, and consisting of reserved section 3601, was repealed by Pub. L. 116–283, div. A, title XVIII, §1824(a), Jan. 1, 2021, 134 Stat. 4205.

#### Amendments

**2022**—Pub. L. 117–263, div. A, title VIII, §804(a), Dec. 23, 2022, 136 Stat. 2696, amended chapter analysis generally, substituting "RAPID ACQUISITION PROCEDURES" for "[Reserved]" in heading and item 3601 for former items for subchapters I and II, which were both "[Reserved]".

**2021**—Pub. L. 117–81, div. A, title XVII, §1701(i)(5)(B)(i), Dec. 27, 2021, 135 Stat. 2141, amended Pub. L. 116–283, div. A, title XVIII, §1824(a), Jan. 1, 2021, 134 Stat. 4205, which added this analysis, by substituting "[Reserved]" for "RAPID ACQUISITION PROCEDURES" in chapter heading.
§ 15.504 Who may inspect records and records management practices? ( a ) You may inspect the probate file at the relevant agency before the file is transferred to OHA. Access to records in the probate file is governed by 25 U.S.C. 2216(e), the Privacy Act, and the Freedom of Information Act.
( b ) The Secretary and the Archivist of the United States may inspect records and records management practices and safeguards required under the Federal Records Act.
#### § 11.404 False imprisonment.

A person commits a misdemeanor if he or she knowingly restrains another unlawfully so as to interfere substantially with his or her liberty.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

# U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry Holds Talks with Indian Finance Minister

By Staff writer

                WASHINGTON  –              

U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry has met with India’s Finance Minister Arun Jaitley during a visit aimed at boosting economic relations between the world’s largest democracies.

Kerry, accompanied by Commerce Secretary Penny Pritzker, is in New Delhi to urge India to drop its opposition to global trade reforms that economists say would stimulate the world economy.

July 31 is the World Trade Organization’s deadline for adopting the reforms.

Kerry said earlier this week that India’s willingness to support a rules-based trading system would attract greater investment from the United States and around the world.

India has said it would not back the trade reforms unless it is also allowed the right to buy grain from farmers at above-market prices, stockpile it, and sell it to the poor at government-subsidized prices.

WTO rules say stockpiled food can only be sold at market prices.

Kerry will meet August 1 with Prime Minister Narendra Modi, a Hindu nationalist who was shunned by Washington until not long before his sweeping election victory in May.

Along with trade, U.S. and Indian officials also plan to talk about climate change, energy issues, and what the State Department calls the robust people-to-people ties.

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

pacom

news

articles
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

ALLURE ENERGY, INC.,

Appellant

v.

ANDREI IANCU, UNDER SECRETARY OF 

COMMERCE FOR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY 

AND DIRECTOR OF THE UNITED STATES 

PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE,

Intervenor

______________________ 

2017-1578, 2017-1579

______________________ 

Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. 

IPR2015-01248, IPR2015-01251.

______________________ 

JUDGMENT

______________________ 

JOHN S. ARTZ, Dickinson Wright PLLC, Troy, MI, argued for appellant. Also represented by BRYAN JOSEPH 

SCHOMER. 

 BENJAMIN T. HICKMAN, Office of the Solicitor, United 

States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, 
 

argued for intervenor. Also represented by NATHAN K.

KELLEY, THOMAS W. KRAUSE, JOSEPH GERARD PICCOLO. 

______________________ 

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 

 PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, DYK and TARANTO,

Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

 June 13, 2018 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner 

 Date Peter R. Marksteiner

 Clerk of Court
#### STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff, vs. WALTER JAMES SHARETTE, Defendant.

DECISION

No. 4181

DATED this 18th day of March, 1977.

The application of the above-named defendant for a review of the sentence of Ten (10) years with last Three (3) years suspended, two counts, to run concurrently imposed on December 16, 1976, was fully heard and after a careful consideration of the entire matter it is decided that:

The sentence be and remain a term of ten years except five years of said sentence is hereby suspended upon the condition that said defendant shall attend Vo Tech and also participate in the program at the Rimrock Center. During the period of suspension the defendant shall be under the supervision of the Montana Probation and Parole Bureau and subject to their rules and regulations.

We wish to thank Jim Driscoll, Attorney at Law, Helena and Fausto G. Turren, Montana Defender Project for their assistance to the defendant and this Court.

SENTENCE REVIEW DIVISION

Jack D. Shanstrom, Chairman; Jack L. Green, Robert C. Sykes.
§ 1000.82 What types of provisions must be included in a BIA AFA? Each AFA must specify the programs and it must also specify the applicable funding: ( a ) Retained by BIA for “inherently Federal functions” identified as “residuals” (See § 1000.94);
( b ) Transferred or to be transferred to the Tribe/Consortium (See § 1000.91); and
( c ) Retained by BIA to carry out functions that the Tribe/Consortium could have assumed but elected to leave with BIA. (See § 1000.101).
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

# S. Korean President Reaffirms US-ROK Alliance, Vows to Strengthen Defense on Fifth Anniversary on the S. Korean Navy Pohang-class Corvette Cheonan 

By Tim Oberle, Eighth Army Public Affairs

                DAEJON, South Korea  –              

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More News and Articles
#### Angelo Petruzzi, Respondent, v. The Brooklyn Heights Railroad Company, Appellant.

Judgment and order of the County Court of Kings,county unanimously affirmed, on consent, in open court, without costs. Present —Woodward, Jenks, Hooker, Rich and Miller, JJ.
#### § 162.015 May a lease contain a preference consistent with tribal law for employment of tribal members?

A lease of Indian land may include a provision, consistent with tribal law, requiring the lessee to give a preference to qualified tribal members, based on their political affiliation with the tribe.
### §1095a. Medical care: members held as captives and their dependents

(a) Under regulations prescribed by the President, the Secretary concerned shall pay (by advancement or reimbursement) any person who is a former captive, and any dependent of that person or of a person who is in a captive status, for health care and other expenses related to such care, to the extent that such care—

(1) is incident to the captive status; and

(2) is not covered—

(A) by any other Government medical or health program; or

(B) by insurance.

(b) In the case of any person who is eligible for medical care under section 1074 or 1076 of this title, such regulations shall require that, whenever practicable, such care be provided in a facility of the uniformed services.

(c) In this section:

(1) The terms "captive status" and "former captive" have the meanings given those terms in section 559 of title 37.

(2) The term "dependent" has the meaning given that term in section 551 of that title.

(Added Pub. L. 99–399, title VIII, §806(c)(1), Aug. 27, 1986, 100 Stat. 886, §1095; renumbered §1095a, Pub. L. 100–26, §7(e)(2), Apr. 21, 1987, 101 Stat. 281; amended Pub. L. 100–526, title I, §106(b)(1), Oct. 24, 1988, 102 Stat. 2625.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1988—Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 100–526 substituted "The terms 'captive status' " for " 'Captive status' " in par. (1), and "The term 'dependent' " for " 'Dependent' " in par. (2).

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date; Regulations

Pub. L. 99–399, title VIII, §806(c)(3), Aug. 27, 1986, 100 Stat. 886, provided that:

"(A) Section 1095 [now 1095a] of title 10, United States Code, as added by paragraph (1), shall apply with respect to any person whose captive status begins after January 21, 1981.

"(B) The President shall prescribe specific regulations regarding the carrying out of such section with respect to persons whose captive status begins during the period beginning on January 21, 1981, and ending on the effective date of that section [Aug. 27, 1986]."

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Delegation of Functions

Functions of President under this section delegated to Secretary of Defense, see section 3 of Ex. Ord. No. 12598, June 17, 1987, 52 F.R. 23421, set out as a note under section 5569 of Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.