alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 12.2**

 

**Certification of Chief FinancialOfficer**

**Pursuant to Section 302 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

I, Jonathan Burgin, certify that:

 

1.       Ihave reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Anchiano Therapeutics Ltd. (the “Company”);

 

2.       Basedon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessaryto make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect tothe period covered by this report;

 

3.       Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial information included in this report fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented inthis report;

 

4.       TheCompany's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and have:

 

a.       Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,to ensure that material information relating to the Company is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly duringthe period in which this report is being prepared;

 

b.       Notused;

 

c.       Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions aboutthe effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this annual report based onsuch evaluation; and

 

d.       Disclosedin this report any change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period coveredby the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal controlover financial reporting; and

 

5.       TheCompany's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the Company’s auditors and the Company’s audit committee of the Company's board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):

 

a.       Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting whichare reasonably likely to adversely affect the Company’s ability to record, process, summarize, and report financial information;and

 

b.       Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Company’sinternal control over financial reporting.

 

 

Date: March 25, 2019

 

**Jonathan Burgin**

**Chief Financial and Operating Officer**

**Anchiano Therapeutics Ltd.**
### §12009. Army and Air Force reserve components: temporary increases

(a) The authorized strength in any reserve grade, as prescribed under this chapter, for any reserve component under the jurisdiction of the Secretary of the Army or the Secretary of the Air Force is automatically increased to the minimum extent necessary to give effect to each appointment made in that grade under section 1211(a), 7036, 14304(b), 14314, or 14317 of this title.

(b) An authorized strength so increased is increased for no other purpose. While an officer holds that grade, the officer whose appointment caused the increase is counted for the purpose of determining when other appointments, not under those sections, may be made in that grade.

(Added Pub. L. 103–337, div. A, title XVI, §1662(a)(1), Oct. 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 2987; amended Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, §809(a), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1840.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

Provisions similar to those in this section were contained in sections 3212 and 8212 of this title, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 103–337, §1662(a)(3).

#### Amendments

2018—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 115–232 substituted "section 1211(a), 7036," for "section 1211(a), 3036,".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2018 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 115–232 effective Feb. 1, 2019, with provision for the coordination of amendments and special rule for certain redesignations, see section 800 of Pub. L. 115–232, set out as a note preceding section 3001 of this title.

#### Effective Date

Section effective Dec. 1, 1994, except as otherwise provided, see section 1691 of Pub. L. 103–337, set out as a note under section 10001 of this title.
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Grace F. Ronn, Appellant. Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.

[822 NYS2d 743]

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed December 6, 2005, which ruled that claimant’s request for a hearing was untimely.

By initial determination dated and mailed August 17, 2005, claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits on the basis that she voluntarily left her employment without good cause and assessed a recoverable overpayment of benefits upon a finding that claimant made willful false statements for the purpose of obtaining benefits. Despite receiving the determination shortly after it was mailed, claimant did *901not request a hearing until September 27, 2005 because she was busy working and neglected to read that part of the determination regarding her right to a hearing. Inasmuch as claimant did not provide a reasonable excuse for failing to request a hearing within the strict 30-day statutory time period set forth in Labor Law § 620 (1) (a), we find no reason to disturb the decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board finding that claimant’s request for a hearing was untimely *(see Matter of Brown [Commissioner of Labor],*4 AD3d 604 [2004]; *Matter of Hart [Hudacs],*199 AD2d 667, 668 [1993]). In view of the foregoing, the merits of the initial determination denying claimant’s request for unemployment insurance benefits are not properly before this Court *(see Matter of Wilner [Commissioner of Labor],*27 AD3d 860, 861 [2006]).

Peters, J.E, Spain, Carpinello, Mugglin and Rose, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.
file:///J|/INITENG/P12%20cases/p120548.sr.txt[6/4/2013 8:08:17 AM] INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT PMN: 12-0548 Standard Review Draft 10/31/2012 ENGINEER: El-Zoobi \ AH \ JASfile:///J|/INITENG/P12%20cases/p120548.sr.txt[6/4/2013 8:08:17 AM] SAT (concerns) (09/21/2012): Migration to groundwater: Negligible PBT rating: P2B2T2 Health: 2 Dermal, Drinking Water, Inhalation Eco: 3 Water (All releases to water with a CC = 8 ppb), XB Testing (Testing desired) OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE RATING: 2B NOTES & KEY ASSUMPTIONS:file:///J|/INITENG/P12%20cases/p120548.sr.txt[6/4/2013 8:08:17 AM] Generated by the 06/07/2005 version of ChemSTEER.file:///J|/INITENG/P12%20cases/p120548.sr.txt[6/4/2013 8:08:17 AM]file:///J|/INITENG/P12%20cases/p120548.sr.txt[6/4/2013 8:08:17 AM] INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT PMN: 12-0548file:///J|/INITENG/P12%20cases/p120548.sr.txt[6/4/2013 8:08:17 AM]file:///J|/INITENG/P12%20cases/p120548.sr.txt[6/4/2013 8:08:17 AM]file:///J|/INITENG/P12%20cases/p120548.sr.txt[6/4/2013 8:08:17 AM] INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT PMN: 12-0548file:///J|/INITENG/P12%20cases/p120548.sr.txt[6/4/2013 8:08:17 AM]file:///J|/INITENG/P12%20cases/p120548.sr.txt[6/4/2013 8:08:17 AM]file:///J|/INITENG/P12%20cases/p120548.sr.txt[6/4/2013 8:08:17 AM] INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT PMN: 12-0548file:///J|/INITENG/P12%20cases/p120548.sr.txt[6/4/2013 8:08:17 AM]file:///J|/INITENG/P12%20cases/p120548.sr.txt[6/4/2013 8:08:17 AM]file:///J|/INITENG/P12%20cases/p120548.sr.txt[6/4/2013 8:08:17 AM]file:///J|/INITENG/P12%20cases/p120548.sr.txt[6/4/2013 8:08:17 AM]
§ 161.100 Do tribal laws apply to grazing permits? Navajo Nation laws generally apply to land under the jurisdiction of the Navajo Nation, except to the extent that those Navajo Nation laws are inconsistent with this part or other applicable federal law. This part may be superseded or modified by Navajo Nation laws with Secretarial approval, however, so long as: ( a ) The Navajo Nation laws are consistent with the enacting Navajo Nation's governing documents;
( b ) The Navajo Nation has notified BIA of the superseding or modifying effect of the Navajo Nation laws;
( c ) The superseding or modifying of the regulation would not violate a federal statute or judicial decision, or conflict with the Secretary's general trust responsibility under federal law; and
( d ) The superseding or modifying of the regulation applies only to Navajo Partitioned Lands.
#### § 11.700 Probate jurisdiction.

The Court of Indian Offenses shall have jurisdiction to administer in probate the estate of a deceased Indian who, at the time of his or her death, was domiciled or owned real or personal property situated within the Indian country under the jurisdiction of the court to the extent that such estate consists of property which does not come within the jurisdiction of the Secretary of the Interior.
IV

House Calendar No. 80

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 234

[Report No. 106–213]

Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the

bill (H.R. 775) to establish certain procedures for civil actions brought

for damages relating to the failure of any device or system to process

or otherwise deal with the transition from the year 1999 to the year

2000, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 30, 1999

Mr. DREIER, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution;

which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

RESOLUTION

Waiving points of order against the conference report to

accompany the bill (H.R. 775) to establish certain procedures for civil actions brought for damages relating to

the failure of any device or system to process or otherwise deal with the transition from the year 1999 to

the year 2000, and for other purposes.

1 Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it

2 shall be in order to consider the conference report to ac3 company the bill (H.R. 775) to establish certain proce-
2

HRES 234 RH

1 dures for civil actions brought for damages relating to the

2 failure of any device or system to process or otherwise deal

3 with the transition from the year 1999 to the year 2000,

4 and for other purposes. All points of order against the con5 ference report and against its consideration are waived.

6 The conference report shall be considered as read.

House Calendar No. 80

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 234

[Report No. 106–213]

RESOLUTION

Waiving points of order against the conference reand for other purposes. transition from the year 1999 to the year 2000, or system to process or otherwise deal with the for damages relating to the failure of any device lish certain procedures for civil actions brought port to accompany the bill (H.R. 775) to estabJUNE 30, 1999

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be

printed
### §12209. Officer candidates: enlisted Reserves

(a) Within such numbers as the Secretary concerned may prescribe, enlisted Reserves may, with their consent, be selected for training as officer candidates. Enlisted Reserves so selected shall be designated as officer candidates during that training. However, no member of the Army National Guard of the United States or the Air National Guard of the United States may be so selected or designated unless—

(1) he is on active duty; or

(2) the governor or other appropriate authority of the jurisdiction concerned consents.

(b) The enlistment or term of service of a Reserve who is designated as an officer candidate under this section is extended to include any period, beyond its normal expiration date, during which he is an officer candidate.

(c) While he is on active duty, other than active duty for training without pay, or performing authorized travel to and from that duty, an officer candidate designated under this section is entitled to the pay and allowances of his enlisted grade, but not less than those prescribed for pay grade E–2.

(d) An officer candidate designated under this section may not participate in the program of a reserve officer training corps of any armed force.

(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 26, §600; renumbered §12209, Pub. L. 103–337, div. A, title XVI, §1662(c)(3), Oct. 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 2990; Pub. L. 104–106, div. A, title XV, §1501(b)(12)(A), Feb. 10, 1996, 110 Stat. 496.)

| Revised section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 600(a)600(b)600(c)600(d) | 50:935(a).50:954(a).50:973.50:954(b). | July 9, 1952, ch. 608, §§215(a), 230, 242, 66 Stat. 486, 489, 492. |

600(b)

600(c)

600(d)

50:954(a).

50:973.

50:954(b).

In subsection (a), the words "who is not in active Federal service" are substituted for the words "when not in the active military service of the United States". The word "during" is substituted for the words "for the period of".

In subsection (c), the words "active duty other than active duty for training without pay" are substituted for the words "active duty or active duty for training with pay". The words "enlisted members of the reserve components designated as", "enlisted", and "under the Career Compensation Act of 1949, as amended" are omitted as surplusage.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1996—Pub. L. 104–106 substituted "candidates: enlisted Reserves" for "candidates" in section catchline.

1994—Pub. L. 103–337 renumbered section 600 of this title as this section.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1996 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 104–106 effective as if included in the Reserve Officer Personnel Management Act, title XVI of Pub. L. 103–337, as enacted on Oct. 5, 1994, see section 1501(f)(3) of Pub. L. 104–106, set out as a note under section 113 of this title.
Revision to the Georgia State Implementation Plan for the Removal of Georgia Rule 391-3-1-.02(zz) Gasoline Dispensing Facilities – Stage II: Submitted January 2015 Note: The Narrative and the Appendices are available from the links below.
• Revision to the Georgia State Implementation Plan for the Removal of Georgia Rule 391-3-1-.02(zz) Gasoline Dispensing Facilities – Stage II • Appendices ◦ Appendix A: Stage II VRS Incremental Benefit Analysis ◦ Appendix B: Ozone Sensitivity in Atlanta in Relation to the SEMAP Sensitivity Study ◦ Appendix B1: Atlanta NOx VOC Sensitivity 2018 ◦ Appendix C: SEMAP Sensitivity Study-NOx ◦ Appendix C: SEMAP Sensitivity Study-VOC ◦ Appendix D: Stage II Rule Package-Synopsis and Rationale ◦ Appendix D: Stage II Rule Package-Rule Revisions ◦ Appendix E: Emissions and Air Quality Modeling for SEMAP-Final Report Page 1 of 1

6/22/ 2015 file:///C:/Program%20Files%20(x86)/Documentum/CTS/docbases/ProDocbase/config/temp_sessions/486871749 ...
#### Mary E. Pirong, as Administratrix, etc., Respondent, v. Syracuse Lighting Company, Appellant.

Motion for reargument denied, With ten dollars costs. Motion for leave to appeal' to the Court of Appeals denied.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Under Secretary of Defense for Policy Dr. Colin Kahl Meetings in Japan

DoD  Immediate Release

WASHINGTON -- Department of Defense Spokesman Lt. Col. David Herndon provided the following readout:Under Secretary of Defense for Policy Dr. Colin Kahl visited Japan for a series of productive counterpart talks with the Government of Japan, June 16-17.Reaffirming the strength of the U.S.-Japan Alliance, Under Secretary Kahl met with Vice Minister of Defense SUZUKI Atsuo, Vice Minister of Defense for International Affairs OKA Masami, Vice Minister of Foreign Affairs MORI Takeo, and National Security Advisor AKIBA Takeo. Under Secretary Kahl’s engagements advanced efforts to strengthen and modernize the U.S.-Japan Alliance, optimize force posture, and enhance cooperation with likeminded Allies and partners.The Under Secretary’s visit to Japan underscores the progress of the U.S.-Japan Alliance following the historic January 2023 U.S.-Japan Security Consultative Committee (2+2) Meeting and Secretary Lloyd J. Austin III’s recent visit to the region. It also reaffirms our commitment to working in close partnership to preserve peace and stability in the Indo-Pacific region. 

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More
### §1454. Correction of administrative errors

(a) Authority.—The Secretary concerned may, under regulations prescribed under section 1455 of this title, correct or revoke any election under this subchapter when the Secretary considers it necessary to correct an administrative error.

(b) Finality.—Except when procured by fraud, a correction or revocation under this section is final and conclusive on all officers of the United States.

(Added Pub. L. 92–425, §1(3), Sept. 21, 1972, 86 Stat. 711; amended Pub. L. 101–189, div. A, title XIV, §1407(a)(10)(A), Nov. 29, 1989, 103 Stat. 1589; Pub. L. 104–201, div. A, title VI, §634, Sept. 23, 1996, 110 Stat. 2577.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1996—Pub. L. 104–201 amended section generally. Prior to amendment, section read as follows: "The Secretary concerned may, under regulations prescribed under section 1455 of this title, correct or revoke any election under this subchapter when he considers it necessary to correct an administrative error. Except when procured by fraud, a correction or revocation under this section is final and conclusive on all officers of the United States."

1989—Pub. L. 101–189 substituted "errors" for "deficiencies" in section catchline.
IRS Imposter Scams

Here’s how they work:

You get a call from someone who says she’s from the IRS. She says that you 

owe back taxes. She threatens to sue you, arrest or deport you, or revoke 

your license if you don’t pay right away. She tells you to put money on a 

prepaid debit card and give her the card numbers.

The caller may know some of your Social Security number. And your caller ID 

might show a Washington, DC area code. But is it really the IRS calling? 

No. The real IRS won’t ask you to pay with prepaid debit cards or wire 

transfers. They also won’t ask for a credit card over the phone. And when the 

IRS first contacts you about unpaid taxes, they do it by mail, not by phone. 

And caller IDs can be faked.

Here’s what you can do:

1. Stop. Don’t wire money or pay with a prepaid debit card. Once you 

send it, the money is gone. If you have tax questions, go to irs.gov or 

call the IRS at 800-829-1040. 

2. Pass this information on to a friend. You may not have gotten one of 

these calls, but the chances are you know someone who has.
PassitON Want to know more? Sign up for 

scam alerts at ftc.gov/subscribe.

Federal Trade Commission | ftc.gov/PassItOn

Please Report Scams

If you spot a scam, please report it to the Federal 

Trade Commission.

•	 Call the FTC at 1-877-FTC-HELP 

(1-877-382-4357) or TTY 1-866-653-4261

•	 Go online: ftc.gov/complaint

Your complaint can help protect other people. 

By filing a complaint, you can help the FTC’s 

investigators identify the imposters and stop them 

before they can get someone’s hard-earned money. 

It really makes a difference.
#### § 137.8 Indian lands excluded.

This public notice, with the exception of that part dealing with payment in advance each year of operation and maintenance charges against lands in Indian ownership operated under lease, does not apply in so far as payments are concerned to Indian lands within the project. The act of July 1, 1932 (47 Stat. 564; 25 U.S.C. 386a) defers the collection of construction costs from Indian owned lands so long as the title to such lands remains in the Indian ownership.
OFFICER CERTIFICATE





UBS-Citibank
Commercial Mortgage Trust
Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates
Series 2011-C1





March 1, 2013



Pursuant to the requirements of that
certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement (the "Agreement"), it is hereby certified that on behalf of PNC Bank, National
Association d/b/a Midland Loan Services as successor by merger to Midland Loan Services, Inc. (the "Servicer"),



(i) a review of the Servicer's activities
during the calendar year 2012 (the "Reporting Period") and of its performance under the Agreement has been made under
the undersigned officer's supervision;

(ii) to the best of the undersigned
officer's knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material
respects throughout the Reporting Period or, if there has been a failure to fulfill any such obligation in any material respect,
each such failure known to the undersigned officer and the nature and status thereof are set forth below; and





Nature and Status of Failures: None.









PNC BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCATION

d/ba MIDLAND LOAN SERVICES



/s/ Steven W. Smith

Steven W. Smith

Executive Vice President







Member of The PNC Financial
Services Group

10851 Mastin Boulevard Overland
Park, Kansas 66210

800-327-8083

www.pnc.com/midland
### Studies of the Mowry shale (Cretaceous) and contemporary formations in the United States and Canada

By: John B. Reeside Jr.William Aubrey Cobban

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/pp355

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 3**                            (924 pdf) 
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.