alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Joaquin CASTANER, Debtor, Appellant, v. Rafael MORA, Creditor, Appellee.

No. 4859.

United States Court of Appeals First Circuit.

Submitted Oct. 7, 1954.

Decided Oct. 22, 1954.

Jorge F. Romany, San Juan, Puerto Rico, for appellant.

Anibal Padilla, Ponce, Puerto Rico, for appellee.

Before MAGRUDER, Chief Judge, and WOODBURY and HARTIGAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

This is an attempted appeal from an order of the district court entered April 30, 1954, setting aside an order of a referee in bankruptcy and remanding the case to the referee for further consistent proceedings.

Appellant Joaquin Castañer was adjudicated bankrupt on July 24, 1953. Appellee Rafael Mora is a secured creditor of the bankrupt, having a mortgage upon the bankrupt’s coffee farm and the buildings thereon. The validity of the mortgage debt and of the mortgage securing it is not now in question. Located in one of the buildings is certain machinery intended for the washing and cleaning of the coffee, though never so used by the bankrupt. The referee ruled that the said machinery was not covered by the mortgage, and by order on April 1, 1954, directed that the machinery be sold separately at public sale for the benefit of the general creditors.

Upon petition for review of the referee’s order, filed by the secured creditor, the district court ruled as a matter of local mortgage law that the machinery was embraced within the description and coverage of the mortgage; and therefore set aside the aforesaid order of the referee.

The effect of the district court’s order in thus augmenting the coverage of the mortgage held by the secured creditor is to diminish the estate available for distribution to the general creditors. If anybody is aggrieved by the district court’s order, it is the general creditors, whose interests are represented by the trustee in bankruptcy. But the trustee has not undertaken to appeal, nor does it appear that any of the general creditors have sought to force him to do so. It is the bankrupt who has attempted to take this appeal. But the insolvent bankrupt is not aggrieved in a legal sense and has no standing to appeal from this order. See In re Pramer, 7 Cir., 1942, 131 F.2d 733, 734; In re Henry Wood; Sons Co., D.C.Mass., 1922, 279 F. 608; In re Cook’s Motors, Inc., 1 Cir., 1944, 142 F.2d 369.

It follows that appellee’s motion to dismiss should be granted, and an order will be entered dismissing the appeal.
Exhibit 32.1


                              CERTIFICATION
           PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


The undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of
Mid-Wisconsin Financial Services, Inc. ("Mid-Wisconsin") certify pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that (1)
the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Mid-Wisconsin for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2008 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. 78m or
78o(d), and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of Mid-
Wisconsin.



      Date:  March 25, 2009               JAMES F. WARSAW
                                          James F. Warsaw
                                          President and Chief Executive Officer



                                          RHONDA R. KELLEY
                                          Rhonda R. Kelley
                                          Principal Accounting Officer
§ 304.31 Use and collection of social security numbers and other information. The agency will ensure that employees authorized to collect information are aware: ( a ) That individuals may not be denied any right, benefit, or privilege as a result of refusing to provide their social security numbers, unless the collection is authorized either by a statute or by a regulation issued prior to 1975;
( b ) That individuals requested to provide their social security numbers, or any other information collected from them, must be informed, before providing such information, of: ( 1 ) Whether providing social security numbers (or such other information) is mandatory or voluntary;
( 2 ) Any statutory or regulatory authority that authorizes the collection of social security numbers (or such other information);
( 3 ) The principal purpose(s) for which the information is intended to be used;
( 4 ) The routine uses that may be made of the information; and
( 5 ) The effects, in any, on the individual of not providing all or any part of the requested information; and
( c ) That, where the information referred to above is requested on a form, the requirements for informing such individuals are set forth on the form used to collect the information, or on a separate form that can be retained by such individuals.
### §1092a. Persons entering the armed forces: baseline health data

(a) Program Required.—The Secretary of Defense shall carry out a program—

(1) to collect baseline health data from each person entering the armed forces, at the time of entry into the armed forces; and

(2) to provide for computerized compilation and maintenance of the baseline health data.

(b) Purposes.—The program under this section shall be designed to achieve the following purposes:

(1) To facilitate understanding of how subsequent exposures related to service in the armed forces affect health.

(2) To facilitate development of early intervention and prevention programs to protect health and readiness.

(Added Pub. L. 108–375, div. A, title VII, §733(a)(1), Oct. 28, 2004, 118 Stat. 1997.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Time for Implementation

Pub. L. 108–375, div. A, title VII, §733(a)(3), Oct. 28, 2004, 118 Stat. 1998, provided that: "The Secretary of Defense shall implement the program required under section 1092a of title 10, United States Code (as added by paragraph (1)), not later than two years after the date of the enactment of this Act [Oct. 28, 2004]."
Exhibit 35.3






2015 Annual Statement of Servicer Compliance
(Item 1123)





Pooling and Servicing Agreement (the “Pooling
and Servicing Agreement”) dated as of December 1, 2011 by and among Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Securities, Inc. as Depositor,
Wells Fargo Bank, National Association as Master Servicer, Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC as successor Special Servicer to Midland
Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association, Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas as Trustee, Certificate Administrator,
Paying Agent and Custodian, and TriMont Real Estate Advisors, Inc. as Operating Advisor, as amended, relating to the UBS-Citigroup
Commercial Mortgage Trust 2011-C1 Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2011-C1 (UBS-Citigroup 2011-C1).



The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Rialto Capital Advisors,
LLC, as special servicer (the “Special Servicer”) herein certifies to the following:



| | 1. | All servicing activities and performance of such servicing activities under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement are performed
on behalf of the Special Servicer.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | A review of the servicing activities and performance by the Special Servicer for the period of January 1, 2015 to December
31, 2015 (the “Reporting Period”) under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement has been conducted under my supervision.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 3. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Special Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the terms
of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, in all material respects for the Reporting Period and if there has been a failure to fulfill
any such obligations in any material respect, each failure and the nature and status thereof has been specifically identified herein.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------









|Certified by: | /s/ Adam Singer                | Date:  March 1, 2016
|------------- | ------------------------------ | --------------------
|              | Adam Singer, Managing Director |
#### § 115.817 How does OTFM disburse money to a tribe?

Upon receipt of all necessary documentation, OTFM will process the request for disbursement and send the tribe the requested amount of trust funds within one business day. Whenever possible, trust funds will be disbursed electronically to an account in a financial institution designated by the tribe. If there are circumstances that preclude electronic payments, OTFM will mail a check.
#### § 1000.360 Is the trust evaluation standard or process different when the trust asset is held in trust for an individual Indian or Indian allottee?

No, Tribes/Consortia are under the same obligation as the Secretary to perform trust functions and related activities in accordance with trust protection standards and principles whether managing Tribally or individually owned trust assets. The process for conducting annual trust evaluations of Tribal performance of trust functions on behalf of individual Indians is the same as that used in evaluating performance of Tribal trust functions.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Avalon Holdings Corporation on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Ronald E. Klingle, Chief Executive Officer of Avalon Holdings Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Avalon Holdings Corporation.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Ronald E. Klingle  
|Ronald E. Klingle      
|Chief Executive Officer
|November 12, 2007
[No. 4099.]

#### Page v. Yool.

Appellate Practice—Costs—Receipts in Full for Payment of Part—Cancellation of Receipt—Return of Amount Paid.

Where after judgment in the supreme court counsel for the successful party compromised the costs by accepting part of the amount taxed in full of the claim for costs and executed a receipt in full, on motion by the party to cancel the receipt, and for execution for the full amount, the moving party must pay back the amount received before the receipt will be cancelled. A refusal to pay back the amount will be taken as a ratification of the act of counsel in compromising the costs.

*Appeal from the District Court of Arapahoe County,*

*On Motion to Cancel Receipt for Costs and for Execution.*

Mr. Harrte M. Humphries, for the motion.

Mr. R. D. Rees, per contra.

*76
      *Per*Curiam.

In this cause, after. judgment had been pronounced in favor of appellants, their counsel accepted from appellee the sum of eighty dollars, in payment of costs accruing to them in this court. As this was a sum much less than the amount taxed, appellants at once repudiated the transaction, and filed a motion to cancel the receipt for costs filed with the clerk of this court, and for a new fee bill, and for execution. The motion was sustained, with leave to appellee to file a motion to re-tax the costs within five days from the date of such order. Such motion has been filed, and also a motion for a rule on counsel for appellants who received the eighty dollars, and upon appellants to deposit that amount with the clerk of this court, to be held pending a determination of the motion to re-tax costs. This motion appears to be resisted by appellants. They cannot hold the eighty dollars or sanction its retention by their counsel receiving it, and still repudiate the transaction. Their position in resisting the motion practically amounts to a ratification of the act of their counsel in compromising the amount of their claim for costs as taxed. The rule, is therefore, granted, and appellants and their counsel, C. H. Brierly, who received the money, will deposit the eighty dollars with the clerk of this court within three (3) days, to be by the clerk held until the motion by appellee to re-tax costs is determined. Failing to comply with this rule, the order cancelling the receipt for costs given by Mr. Brierly will be set aside, and the judgment for costs in favor of appellants and against appellee in this court will stand as satisfied.

*Motion Granted.*
### Environment of calcium carbonate deposition west of Andros Island, Bahamas

By: Preston E. Cloud Jr.P.D. BlackmonF.D. SislerHenry KramerJ.H. CarpenterE.C. RobertsonL. R. SykesMarcia F. Newell

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/pp350

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **25**                            (2681 pdf)                        
  - **26**                            (741 pdf) 
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

No abstract available.

#### Study Area

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
#### Francis F. Wilson, Jr., and Gilbert K. Harroun, Respondents, v. Paul Weidmann and Caroline Weidmann, His Wife, Appellants.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Woodwaz-d, Jenks, Hookez, Gaynor and Millei, JJ., concurred.
IV

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 164

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that Federal laws

relating to the provision of health care must allow women direct access

to obstetrician-gynecologists and other health care professionals who specialize in obstetrics and gynecology.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 6, 1999

Mr. LUCAS of Kentucky submitted the following resolution; which was referred

to the Committee on Commerce

RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that

Federal laws relating to the provision of health care

must allow women direct access to obstetrician-gynecologists and other health care professionals who specialize in obstetrics and gynecology.

Whereas the Federal Government should increase its support

for women’s health and can make a significant difference

in improving the status of women’s health;

Whereas obstetrician-gynecologists and other health care professionals who specialize in obstetrics and gynecology are

uniquely qualified on the basis of education and experience to provide preventive health services to women

throughout their lives;
2

•HRES 164 IH

Whereas 60 percent of office visits to obstetrician-gynecologists are for preventive care;

Whereas preventive care provided by an obstetrician-gynecologist or other health care professional who specializes

in obstetrics and gynecology includes instruction in breast

self-examination, cervical cancer screening, health education, hypertension and cardiovascular surveillance,

osteoporosis counseling, and identification of victims of

domestic violence;

Whereas obstetrician-gynecologists refer their patients to

other physicians less frequently than other providers,

avoiding costly and time-consuming referrals; and

Whereas more than 37 States have acted to promote direct

access to obstetrician-gynecologists: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That is it the sense of the House of Rep2 resentatives that Federal laws relating to the provision of

3 health care must allow women direct access to obstetri4 cian-gynecologists and other health care professionals who

5 specialize in obstetrics and gynecology.

Æ
EXHIBIT 35.6

U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION,

AS CUSTODIAN

1123 CERTIFICATION

Re: CFCRE
Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2011-C2

Pursuant to the pooling and servicing agreement, the undersigned Officer, to
the best of his/her knowledge, hereby certifies to the following obligations as set forth in Item 1123 of Regulation AB applicable to it:

(A) a review of such partys activities during the preceding calendar year or portion thereof and of such partys performance under this Agreement, or such other applicable agreement in the case
of a Servicing Function Participant, has been made under such officers supervision and,

(B) to the best of such
officers knowledge, based on such review, such party has fulfilled all its obligations under this Agreement, in all material respects throughout such year or portion thereof.



U.S. Bank National Association, as Custodian/s/ Michael FarrellName:

Michael FarrellTitle:

Senior Vice PresidentDate:

March 27, 2012
§ 11.306 Search without a warrant. No law enforcement officer shall conduct any search without a valid warrant except: ( a ) Incident to making a lawful arrest; or
( b ) With the voluntary consent of the person being searched; or
( c ) When the search is of a moving vehicle and the officer has probable cause to believe that it contains contraband, stolen property, or property otherwise unlawfully possessed.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, the court has determined th a t

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________

No. 99-40039 Summary Calendar

_____________________

GILBERTO TREVINO,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

TIMOTHY D. SANDERS, RN, Michael Unit; ANICETO DOMINGUEZ, Doctor, Coffield Unit; JOHN ZOND, Dr., Michael Unit; UNIDENTIFIED RIGGLEMAN, X-ray Technician, Michael Unit; LOUIS E. GIBSON, Medical Director, Michael Unit; GARY L. JOHNSON, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice,

Defendants-Appellees.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 6:98-CV-538

_________________________________________________________________

November 11, 1999

Before JOLLY, JONES, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Gilbe rto Trevino, Texas prisoner # 578527, appeals from the

district court’s dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights

complaint for failure to exhaust his administrative remedies, 42

U.S.C. § 1997e(a). Trevino filed his suit after the effective date

of the Prison Litigation Reform Act (“PLRA”), and his case is thus

governed by the provisions therein. See Underwood v. Wilson , 1512

F.3d 292, 293 (5th Cir. 1998), cert. denied

, 119 S.Ct. 1809 (1999).

The PLRA amended § 1997e to r equire that a prisoner must exhaust

his administrative remedies before filing a § 1983 action. S ee

§ 1997e(a). Trevino did not exhaust administrative remedies before

filing suit, and his purported exhaustion of administrative

remedies during the pendency of his suit does not satisfy the

requirements of § 1997e(a). S ee Underwood

, 151 F.3d at 296.

Accordingly, the district court’s dismissal is AFFIRMED. Trevino’s

motions for production of documents, a temporary restraining order,

and an expedited ruling are DENIED.

JUDGMENT AFFIRMED; MOTIONS DENIED.
ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE

of

PNC BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
d/b/a MIDLAND LOAN SERVICES





Pursuant to the requirements of the applicable Servicing Agreement for the transactions
listed on Schedule I hereto, the undersigned, David D. Spotts, as Senior Vice President of Midland Loan Services, a division of PNC Bank,
National Association, hereby certifies, subject to any limitations listed on Schedule I hereto, as of the date hereof, solely in his capacity
as an officer and not in his individual capacity, as follows:



| | 1. | A review of the Servicer’s activities during the calendar year 2022 (the “Reporting Period”) and of its performance under the
Servicing Agreement has been made under the undersigned officer’s supervision; and
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of the undersigned officer’s knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled
all of its obligations under the Servicing Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





Dated: February 22, 2023





Midland Loan Services, a division of
PNC Bank, National Association





David D. Spotts

Senior Vice President
§ 11.441 Disorderly conduct. ( a ) A person is guilty of disorderly conduct if, with purpose to cause public inconvenience, annoyance or alarm or recklessly creating a risk thereof, he or she: ( 1 ) Engages in fighting or threatening, or in violent or tumultuous behavior;
( 2 ) Makes unreasonable noise or offensively coarse utterance, gesture or display, or addresses abusive language to any person present; or
( 3 ) Creates a hazardous or physically offensive condition by any act which serves no legitimate purpose of the actor.
( b ) *Public* means affecting or likely to affect persons in a place to which the public has access; among the places included are highways, schools, prisons, apartments, places of business or amusement, or any neighborhood.
( c ) An offense under this section is a petty misdemeanor if the actor's purpose is to cause substantial harm or serious inconvenience, or if he or she persists in disorderly conduct after reasonable warning or request to desist. Otherwise, disorderly conduct is a violation.