alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# 36th Airlift Squadron Train for Combat Offloading Readiness  

By Senior Airman Manuel Zamora374th Airlift Wing Public Affairs

YOKOTA AIR FORCE BASE, Japan -- The 36th Airlift Squadron (AS) assigned to Yokota Air Base, Japan, took part in a contingency response exercise with the 36th Contingency Response Group at Andersen Air Force Base, Guam, Jan. 17 through Jan. 19, 2023.The 36th AS provided aircraft for the 36th CRG to practice combat offloading, which quickly deploys cargo and personnel in contested environments, enabling the rapid set-up of a field aerial port. The port is a temporary facility that manages the movement of cargo and passengers as additional aircraft fly in to help fortify a position.Combat offloading is one of the rapid airlift skills that allows coalition forces the capability to perform rapid response of personnel, light vehicles, and supplies anywhere in the Indo-Pacific when needed.

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More
**EXHIBIT 23.2**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-188817 and 333-194894 on Form F-3 and No. 333-187020 on Form S-8, of our reports dated March 25, 2015, relating to the consolidated financial statements of GasLog Ltd. (the “Company”) as of and for the year ended  December 31, 2014, and the effectiveness of GasLog Ltd.’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2014, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 20-F of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2014.

/s/ Deloitte LLP

London, United Kingdom

March 25, 2015
**EXHIBIT 32.1**




**Certification
      of Chief Executive Officer**





Pursuant
      to the requirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, (the “Exchange Act”) and Section 1350 of
      Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. §1350), Daniel N.
      Swisher, Jr., President and Chief Executive Officer of Sunesis
      Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certifies that, to the best
      of his knowledge:





1.
         The Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period
      ended September 30, 2008, to which this Certification is attached as
      Exhibit 32.1 (the “Periodic Report”), fully complies with the requirements
      of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act;
      and





2.
         The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
      of
      the Company.





Date:
                November 7, 2008
            
            /s/
                DANIEL N. SWISHER, JR.Daniel
                N. Swisher, Jr.
              President
                and Chief Executive Officer




This
      certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed
      filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated
      by reference into any filing of Sunesis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. under the
      Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
      as
      amended (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-Q),
      irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such
      filing.
Comisión Federal de Comercio

RobodeIdentidad.gov

 I n c i d e n t e s d e 

seguridad de datos

Qué saber, qué hacer
¿Recibió recientemente un aviso que dice que 

su información personal quedó expuesta como 

resultado de un incidente de seguridad de 

datos? ¿Perdió su cartera? ¿O se enteró de que 

le piratearon una cuenta en línea? Dependiendo 

del tipo de información que se haya perdido, hay 

pasos que puede seguir que lo pueden ayudar a 

protegerse contra el robo de identidad.

Si su información quedó expuesta, visite 

RobodeIdentidad.gov/RobodeDatos 

donde podrá encontrar recomendaciones 

detalladas sobre su situación particular. 

La próxima página le dice lo que tiene que hacer de 

inmediato dependiendo del tipo de información que 

quedó expuesta. Encontrará estos pasos y mucho más en 

RobodeIdentidad.gov/RobodeDatos.
¿Cuál fue la información que se 

perdió o quedó expuesta?

Número de Seguro Social

☐ Si una compañía responsable de exponer su información le ofrece un 

monitoreo de crédito gratis, aprovéchelo.

☐ Pida sus informes de crédito gratuitos en annualcreditreport.com. 

Fíjese si encuentra cuentas o cargos que no reconoce. 

☐ Considere colocar un congelamiento o bloqueo de crédito. Con un 

congelamiento de crédito es más difícil que alguien abra una cuenta 

nueva bajo su nombre.

Si decide no colocar un congelamiento de crédito, al menos 

considere la posibilidad de colocar una alerta de fraude. 

☐ Trate de presentar su declaración de impuestos lo antes posible — 

antes de que lo haga un estafador. El robo de identidad relacionado 

con impuestos se produce cuando alguien usa su número de Seguro 

Social para obtener un rembolso de impuestos o un empleo. 

Nombre de usuario o contraseña en internet

☐ Inicie una sesión en esa cuenta y cambie su contraseña. En lo 

posible, también cambie su nombre de usuario. 

Si no puede iniciar la sesión, comuníquese con la compañía. 

Pregunte cómo puede recuperar la cuenta o cerrarla.

☐ Si usa la misma contraseña en cualquier otro sitio, también cámbiela.

☐ ¿Es un sitio de una entidad financiera, o un sitio donde está 

almacenado el número de su tarjeta de crédito? Revise su cuenta 

para ver si encuentra cargos que no reconoce como propios.

Información de cuenta bancaria o de tarjeta de crédito o débito

☐ Si quedó expuesta la información de su banco, comuníquese con su 

banco para cerrar la cuenta y abrir una nueva.

☐ Si quedó expuesta la información de su tarjeta de crédito o débito, 

comuníquese con su banco o compañía de tarjeta de crédito para 

cancelar su tarjeta y pedir una nueva.
Otra información

Para consultar más recomendaciones para otros tipos 

de información expuesta, visite RobodeIdentidad.gov/

RobodeDatos. 

Si la información de su hijo quedó expuesta como 

resultado de un incidente de seguridad de datos, lea

Robo de identidad infantil – Qué saber, qué hacer.

Septiembre 2016

Comisión Federal de Comercio 

RobodeIdentidad.gov
1

MEMORANDUM DATE: May 11 , 2011 TO: Melanie King, EPA OAQPS/SPPD/ESG FROM: Tany a Parise, EC/R, Inc. SUBJECT: Summary

of Calls with Vendors of Diesel Particulate Filters (DPF)

The purpose of this memorandum is to present a summary of information obtained during calls with vendors of diesel particulate filters (DPF) for stationary diesel engines. Below is a summary of the April 4, 2011 discussion with S cott McBryde of Miratech and April 5, 2011 discussion with Jim McDonald of Ry pos . Miratech Scott McBryde of Miratech conservativel y estimate d that DPF cleaning for ash accumulation would occur every 2,000 to 2,500 hours of operation , or roughl y three times per ye ar. T he estimated frequency of c leanings was based on assuming that a low ash lube oil is being used

. The Miratech DPF sy stem consists of 9 blocks, in a 3 " x 3 " array for a 200 kilowatt ( KW ) (268 horsepower ( HP ) ) . The DPF could be cleaned on

- site by vacuuming or blowing out the ash , Scott explained

. It would take 1 day or less to do the cleaning and the cleaning would n ot require a skilled technician, according to Scott. Ry pos Jim McDonald of Ry pos indicated that for engines in the 117 KW to 372 KW (157 HP to 499 HP) size range, the capital cost of the Ry pos DPF sy stem is approximately $12,000 to $18,000) and the s ys tem is an active DPF sy stem. It has a wire mesh filter, and it is continuously regenerated with a current that is run from the engine. According to Jim, the DPF should still achieve the desired reductions even at lower exhaust temperatures. The DPF can tolerate up to 500 parts per million sulfur fuel, but there could be issues if the fue l has used oil blended into it, Jim said. Interms of the maintenance, the ash that drops to the bottom would have to be vacuumed out approximately once a ye ar. This can be done by the en gine operator with a shop vac. In response to the Alaska concerns about the engine shutting down if there is a problem with the DPF, there is a sy stem available that is used for fire pump engines that could be used, where the engine would continue to oper ate even if there was a problem with the DPF . Jim noted that the operator could install a timer that would lead to engine shutdown if the problem is n o t fi xed in a certain period of time

. 

# E C 

# / R Incorporated Providing Environmental Technical Support Since 1989
#### § 158.56 Partition records.

Upon completion of an action in partition, a copy of the judgment roll showing schedule of costs and owelty moneys having accrued to or from the several parties, together with deeds, or other instruments vesting title on partition, in triplicate, shall be furnished to the Osage Agency. The original allotment number shall follow the legal description on all instruments vesting title. When a grantee is a member of the Osage Tribe who has not received a certificate of competency, deeds or other instruments vesting title shall contain the following clause against alienation:

Subject to the condition that while title to the above-described lands shall remain in the grantee or his Osage Indian heirs or devisees who do not have certificates of competency, the same shall not be alienated or encumbered without approval of the Secretary of the Interior or his authorized representative.
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-15-00083-CV

IN RE CHARLES ROBERT BLAKE

Original Proceeding

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Charles Robert Blake’s amended petition for writ of mandamus is denied.

Absent a specific exemption, the Clerk of the Court must collect filing fees at the 

time a document is presented for filing. TEX. R. APP. P. 12.1(b); Appendix to TEX. R. APP.

P., Order Regarding Fees (Amended Aug. 28, 2007, eff. Sept. 1, 2007). See also TEX. R.

APP. P. 5; 10TH TEX. APP. (WACO) LOC. R. 5; TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. §§ 51.207(b); 51.208; § 

51.941(a) (West 2013). Under these circumstances, we suspend the rule and order the 

Clerk to write off all unpaid filing fees in this case. TEX. R. APP. P. 2. The write-off of 

the fees from the accounts receivable of the Court in no way eliminates or reduces the 

fees owed.

TOM GRAY

Chief Justice
In re Blake Page 2

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Scoggins

Petition denied

Opinion delivered and filed April 30, 2015

[OT06]
#### Nathaniel Perez, Appellant, v Radar Realty et al., Defendants, and Starlite Paint & Varnish Co., Inc., et al., Respondents. Starlite Paint & Varnish Co., Inc., Third-Party Plaintiff, v Akzo Nobel Coatings, Inc., Third-Party Defendant-Respondent.

[824 NYS2d 87]

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Dianne T. Renwick, J.), entered on or about April 12, 2005, which granted third-party defendant’s motion and the respective cross motions of defendants Starlite Paint & Varnish Co. and D & F Paint Co., Inc. for summary judgment dismissing plaintiff’s causes of action for products liability based on allegations of defective design and inadequate warnings, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The claim based on a defective design was properly dismissed *306since no triable issue was presented as to whether “ ‘if the design defect were known at the time of manufacture, a reasonable person would conclude that the utility of the product did not outweigh the risk inherent in marketing a product designed in that manner’ ” *(Denny v Ford Motor Co.,*87 NY2d 248, 257 [1995], quoting *Voss v Black & Decker Mfg. Co.,*59 NY2d 102, 108 [1983]). Plaintiffs expert failed to explain how a product with a higher flash point could be designed and made no showing that utilization of an water-based sealer instead of the complained-of lacquer-based product would be similarly efficacious *(see Felix v Akzo Nobel Coatings,*262 AD2d 447 [1999]). Contrary to plaintiffs assertion, the motion court did not give *Felix*collateral estoppel effect. It properly found, however, that nothing presented in this case warranted a different result.

Although not specifically stated by the motion court, plaintiffs claim for breach of the implied warranty of merchantability was implicitly dismissed. While there are instances in which a design defect claim premised on strict products liability is distinguishable from a design defect claim premised on breach of the implied warranty of merchantability *(see Denny,*87 NY2d at 262), no such situation is presented here. However, even if the claims were distinct, dismissal of the implied warranty of merchantability claim would nonetheless be required in light of the absence of evidence that the warranty was breached.

Also properly dismissed was plaintiffs products liability claim based on the theory of inadequate warning. Plaintiff testified that he made no attempt to read or to obtain assistance in reading the product label and, accordingly, the alleged labeling deficiency could not have caused the complained-of harm *(see Sosna v American Home Prods.,*298 AD2d 158 [2002]). Moreover, the record demonstrates that plaintiff was aware of the risks involved in using the highly flammable lacquer sealer *(see Barnes v Pine Tree Mach.,*261 AD2d 295 [1999]; *Baptiste v Northfield Foundry & Mach. Co.,*184 AD2d 841 [1992]). Concur—Tom, J.P., Andrias, Saxe, Marlow and Nardelli, JJ. *[See*7 Misc 3d 1015(A), 2005 NY Slip Op 50599(H) (2005).]
-82 -80 -78 -76 -74

38 40 42



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 1000 18 12 06 00 06/28 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 28 Jun 06

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 38.90 N 76.65 WMeters AGL
§ 11.431 False reports. ( a ) A person who knowingly gives false information to any law enforcement officer with the purpose to implicate another commits a misdemeanor.
( b ) A person commits a petty misdemeanor if he or she: ( 1 ) Reports to law enforcement authorities an offense or other incident within their concern knowing that it did not occur; or
( 2 ) Pretends to furnish such authorities with information relating to an offense or incident when he or she knows he or she has no information relating to such offense or incident.
No. 1167.

#### The State of Louisiana vs. Sampson Paul.

Tn criminal cases the Supreme Court cannot consider an appeal the record of which contains no plea or matter presenting an issue of law involved in the trial.

The course of attorneys who take appeals in criminal cases to which they pay no further attention is deserving of judicial censure.

A PPEAL from the Twelfth District Court, Parish of Grant. *¿X. Blackman,*J.

*John O. Wickliffe,*District Attorney, for the State, Appellee.

*M. T. Machín,*for Defendant and Appellant.

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

PocHií, J.

The defendant appeals from a conviction of larceny and a sentence to bard labor for one year, but the record which his counsel has brought up contains no bill of exceptions, no motion or plea or complaint on which this court can exercise its limited jurisdiction in criminal cases.

In the name of the State and in furtherance of a proper administration of justice, as well as in the interest of the parishes on which the burden of unnecessary costs is thus imposed, we take another occasion to discountenance tlie habit of some attorneys who take appeals in criminal cases, to which they pay no further attention. Such a course can hardly be in the interest of the accused, is unjust to the parish, and hardly respectful to this Court. State vs. Williams, 37 Ann. 311.

Judgment affirmed.
### §12533. Termination of program

(a) In General.—The Secretary shall terminate the insurance program in accordance with this section.

(b) Termination of New Enrollments.—The Secretary may not enroll a member of the Ready Reserve for coverage under the insurance program after November 18, 1997.

(c) Termination of Coverage.—(1) The enrollment under the insurance program of insured members other than insured members described in paragraph (2) is terminated as of November 18, 1997. The enrollment of an insured member described in paragraph (2) is terminated as of the date of the termination of the period of covered service of that member described in that paragraph.

(2) An insured member described in this paragraph is an insured member who on November 18, 1997, is serving on covered service for a period of service, or has been issued an order directing the performance of covered service, that satisfies or would satisfy the entitlement-to-benefits provisions of this chapter.

(d) Termination of Payment of Benefits.—The Secretary may not make any benefit payment under the insurance program after November 18, 1997, other than to an insured member who on that date (1) is serving on an order to covered service, (2) has been issued an order directing performance of covered service, or (3) has served on covered service before that date for which benefits under the program have not been paid to the member.

(e) Termination of Insurance Fund.—The Secretary shall close the Fund not later than 60 days after the date on which the last benefit payment from the Fund is made. Any amount remaining in the Fund when closed shall be covered into the Treasury as miscellaneous receipts.

(Added Pub. L. 105–85, div. A, title V, §512(a), Nov. 18, 1997, 111 Stat. 1729; amended Pub. L. 107–107, div. A, title X, §1048(c)(15), Dec. 28, 2001, 115 Stat. 1226.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2001—Subsecs. (b), (c)(1). Pub. L. 107–107, §1048(c)(15)(A), substituted "November 18, 1997." for "the date of the enactment of this section."

Subsecs. (c)(2), (d). Pub. L. 107–107, §1048(c)(15)(B), substituted "November 18, 1997," for "the date of the enactment of this section".
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

MALIK STEVENS,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 126 EAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 13th day of September, 2023, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED.
### §1155. Statement of benefits

(a) Before Separation.—Not later than 30 days before a member retires, is released, is discharged, or otherwise separates from the armed forces (or as soon as is practicable in the case of an unanticipated separation), the Secretary concerned shall provide that member with a current assessment of all benefits to which that member may be entitled under laws administered by—

(1) the Secretary of Defense; and

(2) the Secretary of Veterans Affairs.

(b) Statement for Reserves.—The Secretary concerned shall provide a member of a reserve component with a current assessment of benefits described in subsection (a) upon release of that member from active duty.

(Added Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title V, §522(a), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1756.)
#### Eliza Guggenheimer, as Executrix, etc., of Randolph Guggenheimer Late of the City of New York, Deceased, Respondent, v. Reinhold M. F. Buge and Others, Defendants, Impleaded with Royal Bank of New York and Samuel Packard, Appellants.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion.
#### § 141.43 Outstanding obligations owed to pledgee.

If the pledgor tenders payment to be applied toward redemption of a pawned item, it shall be so applied by the pledgee, irrespective of other outstanding obligations owed by the pledgor to the pledgee. The pledgee may not deny the pledgor the right to redeem the pawn.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the First Reserve, Inc. (the "Company") Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Ronald A. Shuffield,
President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

          (1). The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
               or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

          (2). The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
               material respects, the financial condition and results of
               operations of the Company.


Date:     August 14, 2002             By:  /s/ Ronald A. Shuffield
                                           Ronald A. Shuffield
                                           President and Chief Financial Officer
Fourth Department,

December, 1907.

#### Charles Mott, Respondent, v. Charles L. Collin, Appellant.

Judgment and order reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide event. Held, that the court committed reversible error in refusing to charge as requested by defendant’s counsel in effect that if the dogs had at any time chased and Worried sheep they had no value. All concurred, except Kruse, J., who dissented.