Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_12-cr-00052/USCOURTS-caed-2_12-cr-00052-9/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
USA
Plaintiff
Leonid Yakovlev
Defendant

Document Text:

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff,

v.

LEONID YAKOVLEV,

 Defendant.

CASE NO. 2:12-CR-0052 WBS

STIPULATION REGARDING 

EXCLUDABLE TIME PERIODS 

UNDER SPEEDY TRIAL ACT; 

[PROPOSED] FINDINGS AND 

ORDER

STIPULATION

Plaintiff United States of America, by and through its counsel of record, and defendant, by 

and through his counsel of record, hereby stipulate as follows: 

1. By previous order, this matter was set for status on January 7, 2013, at 9:30 a.m.

2. By this stipulation, defendant now moves to continue the status conference until 

February 25, 2013, and to exclude time between January 7, 2013, and February 25, 2013, under 

Local Code T4. Plaintiff does not oppose this request.

3. The parties agree and stipulate, and request that the Court find the following: 

a. The government represents that the discovery associated with this case 

includes over 5,000 pages of documents and large spreadsheets detailing over 40,000 

separate transactions, and thousands of fraud complaints to American Express. All of this 

discovery has been produced directly to counsel for the defense.

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

JEAN M. HOBLER

Assistant United States Attorney

501 I Street, Suite 10-100

Sacramento, CA 95814

Telephone: (916) 554-2700

Facsimile: (916) 554-2900 

Attorneys for Plaintiff

United States of America

Case 2:12-cr-00052-WBS Document 28 Filed 01/03/13 Page 1 of 3
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

b. Counsel for defendant has recently consulted with his client and as a result of 

their discussions desires additional time to review the current charges, to conduct 

investigation and research related to the charges, to discuss potential resolutions with his/her 

client, and to otherwise prepare for trial. 

c. Counsel for defendant believes that failure to grant the above-requested 

continuance would deny him/her the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, 

taking into account the exercise of due diligence.

d. The government does not object to the continuance.

e. Based on the above-stated findings, the ends of justice served by continuing 

the case as requested outweigh the interest of the public and the defendant in a trial within 

the original date prescribed by the Speedy Trial Act. 

f. For the purpose of computing time under the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 

3161, et seq., within which trial must commence, the time period of January 7, 2013, at 9:30 

a.m. to February 25, 2013, inclusive, is deemed excludable pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 

3161(h)(7)(A), B(iv) [Local Code T4] because it results from a continuance granted by the 

Court at defendant’s request on the basis of the Court's finding that the ends of justice served 

by taking such action outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy 

trial.

///

///

///

///

///

///

///

///

///

///

Case 2:12-cr-00052-WBS Document 28 Filed 01/03/13 Page 2 of 3
3

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

4. Nothing in this stipulation and order shall preclude a finding that other provisions of 

the Speedy Trial Act dictate that additional time periods are excludable from the period 

within which a trial must commence.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

DATED: January 2, 2013

/s/ Jean M. Hobler___________________ 

JEAN M. HOBLER

Assistant United States Attorney

DATED: January 2, 2013

/s/ Bruce Locke _____________ 

BRUCE LOCKE

Counsel for Defendant 

[as authorized on January 2, 2013]

O R D E R

 

IT IS SO FOUND AND ORDERED this 2nd day of January, 2013.

Case 2:12-cr-00052-WBS Document 28 Filed 01/03/13 Page 3 of 3