Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_15-cv-00101/USCOURTS-cand-4_15-cv-00101-7/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Amazon.com Inc
Defendant
TainoApp, Inc.
Plaintiff

Document Text:

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TAINOAPP, INC.,

Plaintiff,

 v.

AMAZON.COM INC,

Defendant. /

No. C 15-00101 JSW

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

LEAVE TO FILE SURREPLY

The Court has received Plaintiff’s motion for leave to file a surreply. To the extent

Plaintiff argues that Defendant has misconstrued relevant legal authority, the Court does not

require additional briefing. In addition, Plaintiff’s assertion that Defendant’s reply brings forth

new arguments is too vague for the Court to make a determination at this time whether a

surreply would be necessary. Accordingly, the Court DENIES the motion. However, if the

Court determines that it requires additional briefing, it shall notify the parties in advance of the

hearing. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 30, 2015 

JEFFREY S. WHITE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 4:15-cv-00101-JSW Document 114 Filed 06/30/15 Page 1 of 1