Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-15-07766/USCOURTS-ca4-15-07766-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Jonathon Terrell Patterson
Appellant
United States of America
Appellee

Document Text:

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-7766

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

JONATHON TERRELL PATTERSON, a/k/a Joe-Joe,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Richard L. 

Voorhees, District Judge. (5:06-cr-00022-RLV-CH-12)

Submitted: February 25, 2016 Decided: March 2, 2016

Before SHEDD and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jonathon Terrell Patterson, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Richard 

Ascik, Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorneys, 

Asheville, North Carolina; John George Guise, Thomas A. 

O’Malley, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, North 

Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 15-7766 Doc: 11 Filed: 03/02/2016 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Jonathon Terrell Patterson appeals the district court’s 

order granting his motion pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) 

(2012) for a sentence reduction.* We have reviewed the record 

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the 

reasons stated by the district court. United States v. 

Patterson, No. 5:06-cr-00022-RLV-CH-12 (W.D.N.C. Oct. 19, 2015). 

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

 * The district court granted Patterson’s § 3582(c)(2) 

motion, but did not reduce his sentence to the full extent he 

requested. 

Appeal: 15-7766 Doc: 11 Filed: 03/02/2016 Pg: 2 of 2