Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_12-cv-03030/USCOURTS-caed-2_12-cv-03030-2/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Mayuka S. Anderson
Defendant
William Van Anderson
Defendant
Emir Sehic
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

EMIR SEHIC,

Plaintiff, No. 2:12-cv-3030 WBS DAD PS

vs.

WILLIAM VAN ANDERSON; ORDER SETTING STATUS 

MAYUKA S ANDERSON, (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING)

CONFERENCE

Defendants

 /

This action was transferred from the Middle District of Alabama to this court on

December 17, 2012. Plaintiff Emir Sehic, defendant William Van Anderson and defendant

Mayuka S. Anderson are proceeding pro se. The action has therefore been referred to the

undersigned pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21) for all purposes encompassed by that rule.

Pursuant to the provisions of Rule 16 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, IT

IS ORDERED that:

1. A Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference is set for Friday, March 29, 2013,

at 10:00 a.m., at the United States District Court, 501 I Street, Sacramento, California, in

Courtroom No. 27, before the undersigned.

/////

1

Case 2:12-cv-03030-DAD Document 3 Filed 01/22/13 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2. Each party is required to appear at the Status Conference, either by counsel or,

if proceeding in propria persona, on his own behalf. Any party may appear at the status

conference telephonically if the party pre-arranges such appearance by contacting Pete Buzo, the

courtroom deputy of the undersigned magistrate judge, at (916) 930-4128, no later than 48 hours

before the Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference; a land line telephone number must be

provided.

3. Plaintiff shall file and serve his own separate status report on or before March

15, 2013, and each defendant shall file and serve their own separate status report on or before

March 22, 2013. Each party’s status report shall address all of the following matters:

a. Progress of service of process;

b. Possible joinder of additional parties;

c. Possible amendment of the pleadings;

d. Jurisdiction and venue;

e. Anticipated motions and the scheduling thereof;

f. Anticipated discovery and the scheduling thereof,

including disclosure of expert witnesses;

g. Future proceedings, including the setting of

appropriate cut-off dates for discovery and for law

and motion, and the scheduling of a final pretrial

conference and trial;

h. Modification of standard pretrial procedures

specified by the rules due to the relative simplicity

or complexity of the action;

i. Whether the case is related to any other case,

including matters in bankruptcy;

j. Whether the parties will stipulate to the magistrate

judge assigned to this matter acting as settlement

judge, waiving any disqualification by virtue of his

so acting, or whether they prefer to have a

Settlement Conference before another magistrate

judge;

k. Whether the parties intend to consent to proceed before a

2

Case 2:12-cv-03030-DAD Document 3 Filed 01/22/13 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

United States Magistrate Judge; and

l. Any other matters that may aid in the just and

expeditious disposition of this action.

4. The parties are cautioned that failure to file a status report or failure to appear

at the status conference may result in an order imposing an appropriate sanction. See Local

Rules 110 and 183.

DATED: January 22, 2013.

DAD:6

Ddad1\orders.pro se\sehic3030.ossc

3

Case 2:12-cv-03030-DAD Document 3 Filed 01/22/13 Page 3 of 3