Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_09-cv-00732/USCOURTS-caed-2_09-cv-00732-2/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Leonard Ermatinger
Cross Claimant
Larry Painter
Cross Defendant
Ryan Painter
Cross Defendant
UNUM Life Insurance Company of America
Plaintiff

Document Text:

STIPULATION AND REQUEST TO EXTEND DISCOVERY COMPLETION DATE; 

[PROPOSED] ORDER- 1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

Mitchell S. Ostwald, Esq. (#127937) 

Anne Marie Flaherty, Esq. (#99665) 

LAW OFFICES OF MITCHELL S. OSTWALD 

3001 I Street, Suite 300 

Sacramento, California 95816 

Telephone: (916) 388-5100 

Fax: (916) 388-5134 

Attorney for Defendants, Larry Painter 

and Ryan Painter 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA (SACRAMENTO) 

UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF 

AMERICA, a Main Corporation, 

 Plaintiff, 

v. 

LARRY PAINTER, an individual; 

LEONARD ERMATINGER, an individual; 

and RYAN PAINTER, an individual, 

 Defendants. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

CASE NO.: 2:09-CV-00732-FCD-EFB 

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO 

EXTEND DISCOVERY COMPLETION DATE 

The parties, through their respective counsel, respectfully 

submit this Stipulation and Proposed Order to Extend Discovery 

Completion Date. 

This Court issued a Status (PreTrial Scheduling Order) on October 

23, 2009, setting, among other things, a discovery completion date of 

set for March 30, 2010. Just cause exists for extending the discovery 

completion date in that, despite a good faith effort by both parties 

(UNUM Life Insurance Company has been dismissed from this interpleader 

action), it appears that the depositions of all witnesses whose 

depositions have been noticed will not be completed before March 30, 

2010 due to scheduling conflicts. 

Case 2:09-cv-00732-FCD-EFB Document 22 Filed 03/25/10 Page 1 of 2
STIPULATION AND REQUEST TO EXTEND DISCOVERY COMPLETION DATE; 

[PROPOSED] ORDER- 2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

In light of the approaching discovery completion date, and in an 

effort to coordinate the completion of all previously noticed 

depositions, the Parties agree that extending the discovery completion 

date so for the purpose of taking and completing the previously 

noticed depositions until June 4, 2010 would be appropriate. 

The proposed extended discovery completion date will not affect 

any other deadlines contained in the Status (PreTrial Scheduling 

Order. 

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties 

that the Parties will have up to and including June 4, 2010 by which 

to complete all previously noticed depositions. 

DATED: March __, 2010 THE LAW OFFICES OF 

 MITCHELL S. OSTWALD 

 By: 

 MITCHELL S. OSTWALD 

 Attorney for Defendants 

Larry Painter and Ryan 

Painter 

DATED: March __, 2010 By: ____________________________ 

 C. KRISTINE WHITE 

Attorney for Defendant 

Leonard Ermatinger 

ORDER

Good cause appearing to extend the discovery completion date, IT 

IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the discovery completion date shall be extended 

to June 4, 2010. 

Dated: March 25, 2010 

Case 2:09-cv-00732-FCD-EFB Document 22 Filed 03/25/10 Page 2 of 2