Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-02787/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-02787-2/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Axiom Design Automation, Inc.
Counter-claimant
Dynetix Design Solutions, Inc.
Counter-defendant

Document Text:

FENWICK 

&

WEST LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN FRANCISCO

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

DISMISSING ACTION WITH PREJUDICE CASE NO. C-06-02787-CRB 

DARRYL M. WOO (CSB NO. 100513) 

BRYAN A. KOHM (CSB NO. 233276) 

FENWICK & WEST LLP 

275 Battery Street, 16th Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94111 

Telephone: (415) 875-2400 

Facsimile: (415) 281-1350 

dwoo@fenwick.com

bkohm@fenwick.com

Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant 

AXIOM DESIGN AUTOMATION, INC. 

Richard F. Cauley (CSB NO. 109194) 

Michelle M. McCliman (CSB NO. 191241) 

WANG, HARTMANN & GIBBS, P.C. 

1301 Dove Street, Suite 1050 

Newport Beach, CA 92660 

Telephone: (949) 833-8483 

Facsimile: (949) 833-2281 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

DYNETIX DESIGN SOLUTIONS, INC 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

DYNETIX DESIGN SOLUTIONS, INC., 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

AXIOM DESIGN AUTOMATION, INC., 

Defendant. 

Case No. C-06-02787-CRB 

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]

ORDER DISMISSING COMPLAINT AND

COUNTERCLAIMS WITH PREJUDICE

[FED. R. CIV. P. 41(A)((1)] 

Date of Filing: April 24, 2006 

Trial Date: None set 

Case 3:06-cv-02787-CRB Document 23 Filed 01/25/07 Page 1 of 3
FENWICK 

&

WEST LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN FRANCISCO

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

DISMISSING ACTION WITH PREJUDICE 2 CASE NO. C-06-02787-CRB 

Pursuant to the Parties’ settlement agreement, AXIOM Design Automation, Inc. 

(“AXIOM”) and Dynetix Design Solutions, Inc. (“Dynetix”) hereby stipulate and agree pursuant 

to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1), that all claims and counterclaims in the action are hereby dismissed 

with prejudice, with each party to bear its own costs and attorneys’ fees. Notwithstanding said 

dismissal, the Parties specifically agree that AXIOM shall preserve all defenses to any claim for 

infringement, including without limitation the ability to assert a patent’s invalidity or 

unenforceability, which can be asserted only in the event Dynetix breaches Section 3 (Covenant 

Not to Sue) of the Parties’ settlement agreement. 

Dated: January 22, 2007 By: /s/ Bryan A. Kohm ___________________

Fenwick & West LLP 

Attorneys for AXIOM Design Automation, 

Inc. 

Dated: January 22, 2007 By: /s/ Michelle M. McCliman _____________

Wang, Hartmann & Gibbs, P.C. 

Attorneys for Dynetix Design Solutions, Inc. 

// 

// 

// 

// 

// 

// 

// 

// 

Case 3:06-cv-02787-CRB Document 23 Filed 01/25/07 Page 2 of 3
FENWICK 

&

WEST LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN FRANCISCO

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

DISMISSING ACTION WITH PREJUDICE 3 CASE NO. C-06-02787-CRB 

ORDER

The parties having so stipulated, IT IS ORDERED that all claims and counterclaims in the 

action are hereby dismissed with prejudice, with each party to bear its own costs and attorneys’ 

fees. Notwithstanding said dismissal, this dismissal shall not preclude the assertion of and 

AXIOM shall preserve all defenses to any claim for infringement, including without limitation 

the ability to assert a patent’s invalidity or unenforceability, which can be asserted only in the 

event Dynetix breaches Section 3 (Covenant Not to Sue) of the Parties’ settlement agreement. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: January __, 2007 By: ___________________________________

Hon. Charles R. Breyer 

United States District Judge 

24

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Charles R. Breyer

Case 3:06-cv-02787-CRB Document 23 Filed 01/25/07 Page 3 of 3