Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_10-cr-00215/USCOURTS-caed-1_10-cr-00215-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Mauricio Alexander Ramos
Defendant
USA
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DANIEL J. BRODERICK, Bar #89424

Federal Defender

JEREMY S. KROGER, Bar #258956

Assistant Federal Defender

Designated Counsel for Service

2300 Tulare Street, Suite 330

Fresno, California 93721-2226

Telephone: (559) 487-5561

Attorney for Defendant

MAURICIO ALEXANDER RAMOS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

MAURICIO ALEXANDER RAMOS, 

Defendant.

_____________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. 1:10-cr-00215 OWW

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE STATUS

CONFERENCE AND ORDER THEREON

Date: August 23, 2010

Time: 9:00 a.m. 

Judge: Hon. Oliver W. Wanger

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto through their respective counsel,

SUSAN PHAN, Assistant United States Attorney, counsel for plaintiff, and JEREMY S. KROGER,

Assistant Federal Defender, counsel for defendant, MAURICIO ALEXANDER RAMOS, that the date for

status conference in this matter may be continued to August 23, 2010, or the soonest date thereafter that is

convenient to the court. The date currently set for status conference is August 2, 2010. The

requested new date is August 23, 2010. 

The defense makes this request for a short continuance so that it may complete its collection of Mr.

Ramos’ immigration and criminal-history records.

///

///

///

Case 1:10-cr-00215-OWW Document 12 Filed 07/26/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

The parties agree that the delay resulting from the continuance shall be excluded as necessary for

effective defense preparation pursuant to18 U.S.C. §§ 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B).

For this reason, the ends of justice served by the granting of the requested continuance outweigh the

interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. 

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

DATED: July 23, 2010 By /s/ Susan Phan 

SUSAN PHAN

Assistant United States Attorney

Attorney for Plaintiff

DANIEL J. BRODERICK

Federal Defender

DATED: July 23, 2010 By /s/ Jeremy S. Kroger 

JEREMY S. KROGER

Assistant Federal Defender

Attorney for Defendant

Mauricio Alexander Ramos

O R D E R

IT IS SO ORDERED. The intervening period of delay is excluded in the interests of justice

pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 23, 2010 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger 

emm0d6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

DEL CAMPO/Stipulation to

Continue Status Conference and Order 2

Case 1:10-cr-00215-OWW Document 12 Filed 07/26/10 Page 2 of 2