Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cr-00576/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cr-00576-4/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Denzel Anderson
Defendant
USA
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

USA,

Plaintiff,

v.

ANDERSON,

Defendant.

Case No. 14-cr-00576-SI-1 

 

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE RULE 36 

MOTION TO CORRECT CLERICAL 

ERROR

Re: Dkt. Nos. 57, 62

On December 11, 2017, defendant Denzel Anderson filed a pro se “Rule 36 Motion to 

Correct Clerical Error,” contending that he was being denied appropriate credit for pre-plea time 

served. Dkt. No. 57. On January 11, 2018, counsel for the government and for Mr. Anderson 

filed a Joint Response to the motion (Dkt. No. 62). In the Joint Response, government counsel 

asserted that this Court has no jurisdiction to resentence the defendant, and that in any event the 

time served had been properly computed; defendant’s counsel requested that the Court reserve 

ruling until he could file a response, after he reviewed the transcript. Nothing has been filed since 

that time.

Accordingly, counsel for defendant Anderson is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE, in 

writing to be filed no later than March 26, 2018, why the Rule 36 motion should not be 

dismissed. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 15, 2018 ______________________________________

SUSAN ILLSTON

United States District Judge

Case 3:14-cr-00576-SI Document 63 Filed 03/15/18 Page 1 of 1