Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-02390/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-02390-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company
Defendant
TIG Insurance Company
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Charlston, Revich

& Chamberlin LLP

06cv2390.o.125.wpd

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION WITH

PREJUDICE

Robert D. Hoffman, SBN 123458

CHARLSTON, REVICH & CHAMBERLIN LLP

1925 Century Park East, Suite 1250

Los Angeles, California 90067-2746

(310) 551-7000

(310) 203-9321 (facsimile)

Attorneys for Plaintiff TIG Insurance Company

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TIG INSURANCE COMPANY, a

California corporation,

Plaintiff,

v.

PHILADELPHIA INDEMNITY

INSURANCE COMPANY, a

Pennsylvania corporation,

Defendant.

Case No. 2:06-CV-02390-DFL-GGH

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR

DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION

WITH PREJUDICE

Case 2:06-cv-02390-DFL-GGH Document 6 Filed 01/26/07 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Charlston, Revich

& Chamberlin LLP

06cv2390.o.125.wpd

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION WITH

PREJUDICE

2

It is hereby stipulated by and between plaintiff TIG Insurance Company and

defendant Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company, through their designated

counsel, that the above-captioned action shall be and hereby is dismissed with

prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1) with each party to

bear its own costs. 

Dated: December ___, 2006 CHARLSTON, REVICH & CHAMBERLIN 

LLP

 By: ________________________________________

Robert D. Hoffman

Attorneys for Plaintiff Admiral Insurance Company

Dated: December ___, 2006 PROUT • LEVANGIE

 By: ________________________________________

Michael J. LeVangie

Attorneys for Defendant Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance

Company

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 25, 2007

/s/ David F. Levi___________________

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-02390-DFL-GGH Document 6 Filed 01/26/07 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Charlston, Revich

& Chamberlin LLP

06cv2390.o.125.wpd

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION WITH

PREJUDICE

3

PROOF OF SERVICE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )

) ss

COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES )

 I am employed in the County of Los Angeles, State of California. I am over

the age of 18 and not a party to the within action. My business address is: 1925

Century Park East, Suite 1250, Los Angeles, CA 90067-2746.

On January 25, 2007, the foregoing document described as: STIPULATION

AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION WITH

PREJUDICE is being served on interested parties in this action by placing a true

copy thereof enclosed in a sealed envelope addressed as follows:

Michael J. LeVangie, Esq.

Prout • LeVangie

2150 River Plaza Drive, Suite 420

Sacramento, California 95833

Fax No.: (916) 923-2151

 X (BY MAIL) I caused such envelope with postage thereon fully prepaid to be

placed in the U.S. mail at Los Angeles, California. I am "readily familiar"

with the firm's practice of collection and processing correspondence for

mailing. It is deposited with the U.S. postal service on that same day in the

ordinary course of business. I am aware that on motion of party served,

service is presumed invalid if postal cancellation date or postage meter date is

more than one (1) day after date of deposit for mailing in affidavit.

 (BY PERSONAL SERVICE) ALLSTAR Messenger Service, 345 South

Figueroa Street, Suite 305, Los Angeles, CA 90071 delivered such envelope

by hand to the offices of the addressee.

 BY FACSIMILE: By transmitting via facsimile on this date from fax number 

(310) 203-9321 the foregoing documents to the addressee at the facsimile

number indicated therefor, as follows: . The transmission was completed

before 5:00 p.m. The facsimile machine I used complied with California Rules

of Court, Rule 2003 and no error was reported by the machine. Pursuant to

California Rules of Court, Rule 2006(d), I caused the machine to print a

transmission record of the transmission, a copy of which is attached. 

 X FEDERAL I declare that I am employed in the office of a member of the bar

of this court at whose direction the service was made.

Executed on January 25, 2007, at Los Angeles, California.

___________________________

 Jane Wolfberg

Case 2:06-cv-02390-DFL-GGH Document 6 Filed 01/26/07 Page 3 of 3