Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-00888/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-00888-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Mule Creek State Prison
Respondent
Skippy Charles Rutkowski
Petitioner

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

United States District Court

Eastern District of California 

Skippy Charles Rutkowski,

Petitioner, No. Civ. S 04-0888 GEB PAN P

vs. Findings and Recommendations

Mule Creek State Prison,

Respondent.

-oOoAugust 2, 2004, an order served on petitioner was returned

by the postal service as undeliverable. Petitioner has failed to

comply with Local Rule 83-182(d), which requires a party

appearing pro se inform the court of any address change.

Accordingly, I hereby recommend this action be dismissed

without prejudice. L.R. 83-183(b) (dismissal appropriate where

pro se plaintiff fails to notify court of current address within

60 days of return of mail by U.S. Postal Service). 

Pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l), these 

Case 2:04-cv-00888-GEB-PAN Document 10 Filed 11/17/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States

District Judge assigned to this case. Written objections may be

filed within 20 days of service of these findings and

recommendations. The document should be captioned “Objections to

Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” The district

judge may accept, reject, or modify these findings and

recommendations in whole or in part.

Dated: November 17, 2005. 

 /s/ Peter A. Nowinski 

 PETER A. NOWINSKI

 Magistrate Judge

Case 2:04-cv-00888-GEB-PAN Document 10 Filed 11/17/05 Page 2 of 2