Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-02349/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-02349-8/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Bandago LLC
Plaintiff
Digby Adler Group, LLC
Plaintiff
Mercedes-Benz U.S.A., LLC
Defendant
Benjamin Robles
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

CBM-MERCEDES\SF672029-1 Case No. 3:14-cv-02349 TEH

STIPULATION EXTENDING MBUSA’S TIME TO RESPOND TO FOURTH AMENDED COMPLAINT

CARROLL, BURDICK & 

MCDONOUGH LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN FRANCISCO

Troy M. Yoshino, Bar No. 197850 

 tyoshino@cbmlaw.com 

Eric J. Knapp, Bar No. 214352 

 eknapp@cbmlaw.com 

Steven E. Swaney, Bar No. 221437 

 sswaney@cbmlaw.com 

CARROLL, BURDICK & McDONOUGH LLP 

Attorneys at Law 

44 Montgomery Street, Suite 400 

San Francisco, California 94104 

Telephone: 415.989.5900 

Facsimile: 415.989.0932 

Attorneys for Defendant 

MERCEDES-BENZ USA., LLC 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

DIGBY ADLER GROUP, LLC, dba 

BANDAGO LLC, and BENJAMIN ROBLES, 

an individual, on behalf of themselves and all 

others similarly situated,

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

MERCEDES-BENZ U.S.A., LLC, 

Defendant. 

Case No. 3:14-cv-02349 TEH 

STIPULATION EXTENDING 

MERCEDES-BENZ USA’S TIME TO 

RESPOND TO FOURTH AMENDED 

COMPLAINT AND CONTINUING CASE 

MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; 

DECLARATION OF TROY YOSHINO IN 

SUPPORT

Case 3:14-cv-02349-TEH Document 62 Filed 01/12/16 Page 1 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

CBM-MERCEDES\SF672029-1 -1- Case No. 3:14-cv-02349 TEH

STIPULATION EXTENDING MBUSA’S TIME TO RESPOND TO FOURTH AMENDED COMPLAINT

CARROLL, BURDICK & 

MCDONOUGH LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN FRANCISCO

By and through their attorneys of record, plaintiffs Digby Adler Group LLC and Benjamin 

Robles (“Plaintiffs”), on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, and defendant 

Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC (“MBUSA”) stipulate and agree as follows:

1. On April 14, 2014, Plaintiff Digby Adler filed this putative class action in San 

Francisco County Superior Court. MBUSA was served with the summons and complaint on April 

21, 2014. On May 21, 2014, MBUSA removed the case from San Francisco County Superior 

Court to this Court on the basis of diversity jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331(a)(1) and 

1331(d)(2)(A). 

2. On April 28, 2015, Plaintiff Digby Adler filed a Third Amended Complaint 

(“TAC”) [Dkt. 41]. On May 26, 2015, MBUSA filed a motion to dismiss the TAC [Dkt. 46]. 

Plaintiffs filed a response on June 16, 2015 [Dkt. 50]. On September 1, 2015, the Court ruled on 

MBUSA’s motion to dismiss the TAC, granting the motion in part and dismissing it in part [Dkt. 

53]. 

3. On September 15, 2015, the Court granted the Parties’ request to extend MBUSA’s 

deadline to file its answer to the TAC until December 14, 2015 [Dkt. 56]. 

4. On December 11, 2015, the Parties filed a stipulation permitting Plaintiffs to file a 

Fourth Amended Complaint (“FAC”) and requesting an extension of MBUSA’s time to respond 

until 30 days after service of the FAC [Dkt. 58]. Plaintiffs filed and served the FAC on December 

14, 2015 [Dkt. 59]. 

5. On December 15, 2015, the Court granted the Parties’ request to extend MBUSA’s 

deadline to file its answer to the FAC until January 13, 2016 [Dkt. 60]. 

6. The parties continue to make progress in resolving this case, and believe that it 

would conserve resources and enhance judicial efficiency to devote their attention to these efforts 

in the immediate future instead of preparing adversarial filings. Accordingly, counsel for the 

Parties have met and conferred and agree that MBUSA shall have until March 14, 2016 to file its 

response to the FAC. 

7. A Case Management Conference is scheduled in this case for January 25, 2016. 

For the reasons stated above, the Parties agree that the Case Management Conference should be 

Case 3:14-cv-02349-TEH Document 62 Filed 01/12/16 Page 2 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

CBM-MERCEDES\SF672029-1 -2- Case No. 3:14-cv-02349 TEH

DECLARATION OF TROY YOSHINO ISO STIPULATION EXTENDING 

MBUSA’S TIME TO RESPOND TO FOURTH AMENDED COMPLAINT

CARROLL, BURDICK & 

MCDONOUGH LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN FRANCISCO

continued until March 21, 2016. 

8. There are no other scheduled matters in this case. The requested time modification 

would have no effect on the schedule for the case other than as described herein. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

Dated: January 7, 2016 Respectfully submitted, 

CARROLL, BURDICK & McDONOUGH LLP 

By /s/ Troy Yoshino 

Troy M. Yoshino 

Attorneys for Defendant

MERCEDES-BENZ USA, LLC 

Dated: January 7, 2016 Respectfully submitted, 

THE VEEN FIRM, P.C.

CHAVEZ & GERTLER LLP 

By /s/ Dan Gildor 

Dan L. Gildor 

Attorneys for Plaintiff and the Proposed Class and 

Subclasses 

L.R. 5-1(i)(3) Certification 

Pursuant to Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), the filer of the document attests that concurrence in the filing of 

the document has been obtained from each of the other Signatories 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED 

Dated: ______________ By:___________________________ 

 Thelton E. Henderson 

 United States District Judge 

01/11/2016

Case 3:14-cv-02349-TEH Document 62 Filed 01/12/16 Page 3 of 3