Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-01200/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-01200-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
7-Eleven, Inc.
Defendant
Harparkash Dhillon
Plaintiff
Jas Dhillon
Plaintiff
Joe Galea
Plaintiff
Jivtesh Gill
Plaintiff
Paramjyot Gill
Plaintiff
Ruby Enterprises Inc.
Plaintiff
Jatinder Singh
Plaintiff
Veena Singh
Plaintiff
St. George Stores, Inc.
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

JOE GALEA, a resident of the State of 

California, JIVTESH GILL, a resident of 

the State of California, PARAMJYOT 

GILL, a resident of the State of California, 

JATINDER SINGH, a resident of the State 

of California; VEENA SINGH, a resident 

of the State of Nevada; ST. GEORGE 

STORES, INC., a Washington corporation; 

JAS DHILLON, a resident of the State of 

California; HARPARKASH DHILLON, a 

resident of the State of California, and 

RUBY ENTERPRISES INC., a 

Washington corporation, 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

7-ELEVEN, INC., a corporation organized 

under the laws of the State of Texas, 

Defendant. 

No. 2:14-CV-01200-KJM-CKD 

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

 On March 31, 2016, the parties to this action filed an amended notice of 

settlement. ECF No. 34. On April 5, 2016, the court took notice of the parties’ settlement, and 

ordered the parties to file dispositional documents no later than September 30, 2016. ECF No. 

36. On July 17, 2016, the parties filed a joint status report, which states the parties need to collect 

Case 2:14-cv-01200-KJM-CKD Document 38 Filed 10/13/16 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2

signatures to finalize the settlement agreement before filing dispositional documents, and states 

the parties hope to "reach the 90% threshold" within the next few months." ECF No. 37. Nearly 

three months has lapsed since the parties filed their joint status report, and the court has received 

no request for an extension of time to file dospositional documents. The September 30, 2016 

deadline for filing dispositional documents has passed. 

Accordingly, plaintiffs’ and defendant’s counsel are hereby ordered to show cause on or 

before October 21, 2016, explaining why this case should not be dismissed, or explaining with 

particularity when the parties anticipate filing dispositional documents. 

 IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: October 12, 2016 

 

Case 2:14-cv-01200-KJM-CKD Document 38 Filed 10/13/16 Page 2 of 2