Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-00351/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-00351-2/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Dennis Smith
Respondent
William A. Vaughn
Petitioner

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

WILLIAM A. VAUGHN, )

)

)

Petitioner, )

)

v. )

)

)

DENNIS SMITH, )

)

)

Respondent. )

)

 )

1:07-cv- 00351-LJO-TAG HC 

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATION (Doc. 6)

ORDER GRANTING RESPONDENT’S

MOTION TO DISMISS (Doc. 5)

ORDER DISMISSING PETITION FOR WRIT

OF HABEAS CORPUS (Doc. 1)

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT

TO ENTER JUDGMENT

On March 5, 2007, Petitioner filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 2241. (Doc. 1).

On May 16, 2007, Respondent filed a motion to dismiss the petition as premature. (Doc.

5). On June 29, 2007, the Magistrate Judge assigned to the case filed a Findings and

Recommendation recommending the motion to dismiss be granted and that the petition for writ

of habeas corpus be dismissed as premature. (Doc. 6). This Findings and Recommendation was

served on all parties and contained notice that any objections were to be filed within twenty days

from the date of service of that order. To date, no party has filed objections.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted

Case 1:07-cv-00351-LJO-TAG Document 7 Filed 07/26/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

a de novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court concludes that

the Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendation is supported by the record and proper

analysis. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendation filed June 29, 2007 (Doc. 6), is ADOPTED

IN FULL;

2. Respondent’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 5), is GRANTED;

3. This petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. 1), is DISMISSED as

PREMATURE; and,

4. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to ENTER JUDGMENT and close the file. 

This order terminates the action in its entirety. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 25, 2007 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill 

b9ed48 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:07-cv-00351-LJO-TAG Document 7 Filed 07/26/07 Page 2 of 2