Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-03880/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-03880-2/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Cornice, Inc.
Counter-claimant
Papst Licensing GmbH & Co. KG
Counter-defendant
SAE Magnetics Limited
Defendant
TDk Corporation
Defendant

Document Text:

REED SMITH LLP 

A limited liability partnership formed in the State of Delaware. 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Action No. C-05-03880-EMC - 1 -

JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE PLEAD FOR DEFENDANT CORNICE 

DOCSSFO-12418471.1

Jerold B. Schnayer (pro hac vice application pending) 

Daniel R. Cherry (pro hac vice application pending) 

WELSH & KATZ, LTD. 

120 S. Riverside Plaza, 22nd Floor 

Chicago, Illinois 60606 

Telephone: (312) 655-1500 

Facsimile: (312) 655-1501 

John S. Siamas (State Bar No. 049061) 

William R. Overend (State Bar No. 180209) 

REED SMITH LLP 

Two Embarcadero Center, Suite 2000 

San Francisco, CA 94111 

Mailing Address:

P.O. Box 7936 

San Francisco, CA 94120-7936 

Telephone: 415.543.8700 

Facsimile: 415.391.8269 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

Papst Licensing GmbH & Co. KG 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

PAPST LICENSING GMBH & Co. KG, a 

German corporation 

Plaintiff, 

vs.

CORNICE, INC., a Delaware 

corporation; SAE MAGNETICS 

LIMITED, a company located in Hong 

Kong; and TDK CORPORATION, a 

company located in Japan 

Defendants.

No. C-05-03880-MMC 

JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME 

TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE PLEAD 

FOR DEFENDANT CORNICE 

[Civ. L.R. 6-1(a)]

; ORDER

THEREON
REED SMITH LLP 

A limited liability partnership formed in the State of Delaware. 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Action No. C-05-03880-EMC - 2 -

JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE PLEAD FOR DEFENDANT CORNICE 

DOCSSFO-12418471.1

 Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-1(a), Plaintiff Papst Licensing GmbH & Co. KG and 

Defendant Cornice, Inc., hereby stipulate that the time to answer or otherwise plead in response to 

the Complaint shall, for Defendant Cornice, Inc. only, be extended by thirty (30) days to 

November 16, 2005. 

Dated: October 17, 2005

REED SMITH LLP 

By: /s/ 

 William R. Overend 

 Attorneys for Plaintiff 

 Papst Licensing GmbH & Co. KG 

Dated: October 17, 2005

STALLMAN & POLLOCK LLP 

By: /s/ 

 Michael A. Stallman 

 Attorneys for Defendant 

 Cornice, Inc. 

Dated: October 18, 2005

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Maxine M. Chesney