Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-01182/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-01182-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
John Olagues
Plaintiff
Arnold Schwarzenegger
Defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOHN OLAGUES,

Plaintiff, CIV S-07-1182 LKK KJM PS

v.

ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER,

Defendant. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

This action was transferred in from the Eastern District of Louisiana on June 18,

2007 and referred to the undersigned pursuant to Local Rule 72-302(c)(21). Pursuant to Federal

Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m), the court may dismiss an action where service of summons is not

made within 120 days after the filing of the complaint. In the order setting status conference,

filed June 18, 2007, plaintiff was cautioned that this action may be dismissed if service was not

timely completed. This action was filed originally on March 21, 2007 and plaintiff has not yet

served defendant with summons. See Letter filed November 2, 2007, docket no. 5.

A status conference was held before the undersigned on November 7, 2007. 

Plaintiff failed to appear. It appears plaintiff has abandoned this litigation.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed.

/////

Case 2:07-cv-01182-LKK -KJM Document 7 Filed 11/09/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

Judge assigned to the case pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within ten days

after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written

objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned

“Objections to Findings and Recommendations.” Any reply to the objections shall be served and

filed within ten days after service of the objections. The parties are advised that failure to file

objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. 

Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: November 9, 2007. 

006

olagues.4m.57

Case 2:07-cv-01182-LKK -KJM Document 7 Filed 11/09/07 Page 2 of 2