Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-03408/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-03408-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Bags, Inc.
Defendant
Delivery Outsourcing, LLC
Defendant
Luggage Services and Logistics, LLC
Defendant
Salvador Vargas
Plaintiff

Document Text:

-1- 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION TO EXTEND PLAINTIFF’S TIME TO FILE OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO COMPEL 

ARBITRATION AND STAY PROCEEDINGS; AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

Arlo Garcia Uriarte, Esq., SBN 231764 

Un Kei Wu, Esq., SBN 270058 

LIBERATION LAW GROUP, P.C.

2760 Mission Street 

San Francisco, CA 94110 

Telephone: (415) 695-1000

Facsimile: (415) 695-1006

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

Salvador Vargas 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

Salvador Vargas,

Plaintiff,

v.

Delivery Outsourcing, LLC, Luggage Services 

and Logistics, LLC, Bags, Inc., and DOES 1-

10,

Defendants.

Case No. 15-cv-03408 JST

STIPULATION TO EXTEND 

PLAINTIFF’S TIME TO FILE 

OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT’S 

MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION

AND STAY PROCEEDINGS AND 

RELATED DEADLINES AND HEARING;

AND

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Hon. Jon. S. Tigar

Date: February 11, 2016

Location: Courtroom 9

Time: 2:00 p.m. 

 COME NOW the parties, and by and through their respective counsel hereby stipulate that: 

1. Plaintiff requested and Defendants agreed to allow Plaintiff additional time to file his 

opposition to Defendant’s Motion to Compel Arbitration and Stay Proceedings after the 

deadline for such had passed. The parties have agreed to the time for Plaintiff to file an 

Opposition may be extended to January 21, 2016; 

Case 3:15-cv-03408-JST Document 23 Filed 01/19/16 Page 1 of 3
-2- 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION TO EXTEND PLAINTIFF’S TIME TO FILE OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO COMPEL 

ARBITRATION AND STAY PROCEEDINGS; AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

2. The deadline for Defendants to file a Reply to Plaintiff’s Opposition to Defendant’s Motion 

to Compel Arbitration and Stay Proceedings shall be February 4, 2016; and 

3. If convenient to the Court, the hearing on Defendant’s Motion to Compel Arbitration and 

Stay Proceedings shall be rescheduled to February 25, 2016, to allow the Court sufficient 

time to review the papers. 

 The parties respectfully submit that there is good cause for the requested extensions of 

time. Please see Declaration of Un Kei Wu, submitted in support of this Stipulation.

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

DATED: January 19, 2016 /s/ Maureen K. Bogue____________________ 

 MAUREEN K. BOGUE 

 Attorney for Defendant Delivery Outsourcing, LLC 

DATED: January 19, 2016 /s/ Elaine Lerner________________________

 ELAINE LERNER 

Attorney for Defendants Luggage Services and 

Logistics, LLC and Bags Inc. 

DATED: January 19, 2016 /s/ Un Kei Wu_________________________ 

 UN KEI WU 

 Attorney for Plaintiff Salvador Vargas 

FILER’S ATTESTATION

 Pursuant to Civil Local Rules, rule 5-1(i)(3), I attest under penalty of perjury that 

concurrence in the filing of the document has been obtained from its signatory. 

Dated: January 19, 2016 /s/ Un Kei Wu______________ 

 UN KEI WU 

 Attorney for Plaintiff Salvador Vargas 

Case 3:15-cv-03408-JST Document 23 Filed 01/19/16 Page 2 of 3
-3- 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION TO EXTEND PLAINTIFF’S TIME TO FILE OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO COMPEL 

ARBITRATION AND STAY PROCEEDINGS; AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

[PROPOSED] ORDER ON STIPULATION 

Having reviewed the parties’ stipulation and supporting declaration, and good cause 

appearing therein, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s time to file his opposition to Defendant’s 

Motion to Compel Arbitration and Stay Proceedings be extended to and through January 21, 2016. 

Defendant’s Reply to Plaintiff’s Opposition shall be due on February 4, 2016. The hearing on the 

motion, presently set for February 11, 2016, shall be rescheduled to February 25, 2016. 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: January ___, 2016 _________________________________

 Hon. Jon S. Tigar 

 Judge of the Northern District 

 

19

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

 Judge Jon S. Tigar 

Case 3:15-cv-03408-JST Document 23 Filed 01/19/16 Page 3 of 3