Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_13-cv-00870/USCOURTS-caed-1_13-cv-00870-7/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Connie Gipson
Defendant
Guillermo Vera
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GUILLERMO VERA, 

 Plaintiff,

 v.

CONNIE GIPSON, Warden, 

 Defendant(s).

Case No. 1:13-cv-00870-AWI-MJS (PC)

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND 

RECOMMENDATION DISMISSING 

ACTION

(ECF NO. 34)

DISMISSAL COUNTS AS STRIKE 

PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g)

CLERK TO TERMINATE ALL PENDING 

MOTIONS AND CLOSE CASE

Plaintiff initiated this action by filing pro se a petition for writ of habeas corpus

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The Court directed the habeas proceeding be converted

to a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights action and that Plaintiff proceed in forma pauperis. On 

October 27, 2014, the magistrate judge issued findings and recommendation that the action 

be dismissed with prejudice, that dismissal count as a strike pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 

1915(g), and that the clerk of the court terminate any and all pending motions and close the 

case. (ECF No. 34, at 3:18-20.) Plaintiff did not object to the findings and recommendation 

and the time for doing so has expired. 

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), the court has 

conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court 

finds the findings and recommendation to be supported by the record and by proper 

Case 1:13-cv-00870-AWI-MJS Document 35 Filed 11/20/14 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

analysis.

Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The court adopts the findings and recommendation filed on October 27, 2014 

(ECF No. 34), in full,

2. The action is DISMISSED with prejudice and dismissal shall count as a strike 

pursuant to the “three strikes” provision set forth in 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), and

3. The clerk of the court shall terminate all pending motions and close the case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: November 20, 2014 

 SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:13-cv-00870-AWI-MJS Document 35 Filed 11/20/14 Page 2 of 2