Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_06-cv-03058/USCOURTS-cand-4_06-cv-03058-3/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Board of Trustees of the Laborers Health and Welfare Trust Fund for Northern California
Plaintiff
Board of Trustees of the Laborers Pension Trust Fund for Northern California
Plaintiff
Board of Trustees of the Laborers Training and Retraining Trust Fund for Northern California
Plaintiff
Board of Trustees of the Laborers Vacation-Holiday Trust Fund for Northern California
Plaintiff
Canyon Springs Enterprises
Defendant
Gregory Max Chehey
Defendant
Robert Keith Clark
Defendant
Robert Stanley Hamilton
Defendant
RSH Construction
Defendant

Document Text:

-1- 

 PLAINTIFFS’ UNOPPOSED REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL; (PROPOSED) ORDER OF DISMISSAL [CASE NO. C-06-3058 CW (EMC)] 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

James P. Watson (SBN 046127) 

Bruce K. Leigh (SBN 129753) 

Anne Bevington (SBN 111320) 

STANTON, KAY & WATSON, LLP 

101 New Montgomery, Fifth Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94105 

Telephone: (415) 512-3501 

Facsimile: (415) 512-3515 

E-Mail: AnneB@skwsf.com 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE 

LABORERS HEALTH AND WELFARE 

TRUST FUND FOR NORTHERN 

CALIFORNIA; BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF 

THE LABORERS VACATION-HOLIDAY 

TRUST FUND FOR NORTHERN 

CALIFORNIA; BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF 

THE LABORERS PENSION TRUST FUND 

FOR NORTHERN CALIFORNIA; and 

BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LABORERS

TRAINING AND RETRAINING TRUST 

FUND FOR NORTHERN CALIFORNIA, 

 Plaintiffs, 

 v. 

CANYON SPRINGS ENTERPRISES dba RSH 

CONSTRUCTION, a Business Entity; 

ROBERT STANLEY HAMILTON, an 

Individual, and GREGORY MAX CHEHEY, 

an Individual, 

 Defendants. 

 Case No.: C-06-3058 CW (EMC) 

PLAINTIFFS’ UNOPPOSED 

REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL; 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

 

The parties having settled the claims alleged by the plaintiffs in this action, plaintiffs 

request that the action be dismissed, with all parties bearing their own costs except as 

provided in the settlement agreement. Because defendants did not appear in the action, this 

request is not made by stipulation and is unopposed. 

DATED: January 25, 2007. STANTON, KAY & WATSON, LLP 

Case 4:06-cv-03058-CW Document 20 Filed 01/26/07 Page 1 of 3
 -2- 

 PLAINTIFFS’ UNOPPOSED REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL; (PROPOSED) ORDER OF DISMISSAL [CASE NO. C-06-3058 CW (EMC)] 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 By: /s/ Anne Bevington 

Anne Bevington 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

ORDER 

The Court having considered plaintiffs’ unopposed request for dismissal, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this Action be, and hereby is, dismissed with 

prejudice, with all parties bearing their own costs except as provided in the settlement 

agreement. 

 1/26/07 

DATED: ______________________________________ 

 THE HONORABLE CLAUDIA WILKEN 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

F:\CASES\7000\7000.1055 Canyon Springs Ent. II\Pleadings\Request for Dismissal and Proposed Order.doc

Case 4:06-cv-03058-CW Document 20 Filed 01/26/07 Page 2 of 3
 -3- 

 PLAINTIFFS’ UNOPPOSED REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL; (PROPOSED) ORDER OF DISMISSAL [CASE NO. C-06-3058 CW (EMC)] 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

PROOF OF SERVICE

CASE NAME: Board of Trustees of the Laborers Health and Welfare Trust Fund for 

Northern California; et al. v. Canyon Springs Enterprisers.; et al. 

CASE NUMBER: United States District Court, Northern District of California 

 No. C-06-3058 CW (EMC) 

 I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the State of California. I am over the age 

of 18 and not a party to the within action. My business address is 101 New Montgomery Street, Fifth 

Floor, San Francisco, California 94105. 

 On January 25, 2007, I served the following document(s) described as: 

PLAINTIFFS’ UNOPPOSED REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL; 

(PROPOSED) ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

on the following party/parties: 

GREGORY MAX CHEHEY 

3001 E. Tahquitz Canyon Way, #205 

Palm Springs, CA 92262-6901 

ROBERT KEITH CLARK 

3001 E. Tahquitz Canyon Way, #205 

Palm Springs, CA 92262-6901 

CANYON SPRINGS ENTERPRISES, dba RSH 

CONSTRUCTION 

3001 E. Tahquitz Canyon Way, #205 

Palm Springs, CA 92262-6901 

ROBERT STANLEY HAMILTON 

3001 E. Tahquitz Canyon Way, #205 

Palm Springs, CA 92262-6901 

 X (BY MAIL) with postage thereon fully prepaid in the designated area for 

outgoing mail. I am readily familiar with STANTON, KAY & WATSON’S 

practice of collection and processing correspondence whereby mail is sealed, 

given the appropriate postage and placed in a designated mail collection area. 

Each day’s mail is collected and deposited with the United States Postal Service 

after the close of each day’s business. I am aware that on motion of the party 

served, service is presumed invalid if postal cancellation date or postage meter 

date is more than one day after the date of deposit for mailing in affidavit. 

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the 

above is true and correct and that this Declaration is executed on January 25, 2007 at 

San Francisco, California. 

 /s/ Carol M. Christensen 

 Carol M. Christensen 

Case 4:06-cv-03058-CW Document 20 Filed 01/26/07 Page 3 of 3