Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-02365/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-02365-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Dane Palmer
Petitioner

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DANE PALMER,

Petitioner, No. CIV S-05-2365 GEB JFM P

vs.

Respondent. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

By order filed January 12, 2006, petitioner’s application was dismissed and thirty

days’ leave to file an amended application was granted. Petitioner was also directed to either pay

the appropriate filing fee or submit an affidavit in support of his request to proceed in forma

pauperis. The thirty day period has now expired, and petitioner has not filed an amended

application, paid the filing fee, submitted an affidavit, or otherwise responded to the court’s

order.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed

without prejudice. See Local Rule 11-110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty

days after being served with these findings and recommendations, petitioner may file written

Case 2:05-cv-02365-GEB -JFM Document 6 Filed 02/27/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s

Findings and Recommendations.” Petitioner is advised that failure to file objections within the

specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951

F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: February 27, 2006.

/001; palm2365.fta

Case 2:05-cv-02365-GEB -JFM Document 6 Filed 02/27/06 Page 2 of 2