Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_05-cv-02341/USCOURTS-azd-2_05-cv-02341-2/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Nashwan Ahmed Ali
Petitioner
Phillip Crawford
Respondent

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Nashwan Ahmed Ali, 

Petitioner, 

v.

Phillip Crawford, 

Respondent. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV-05-2341-PHX-DGC (HCE)

ORDER

Pending before the Court are Petitioner Nashwan Ahmed Ali’s petition for writ of

habeas corpus and United States Magistrate Judge Hector C. Estrada’s Report and

Recommendation (“R&R”). Docs. ##1, 8. The R&R recommends that the Court deny the

petition because the petition is moot. Petitioner was released from custody on

October 27, 2005. Doc. #8 at 2. The Magistrate Judge advised the parties that they had ten

days to file objections to the R&R and that the failure to timely file objections to any

determination of the Magistrate Judge would be considered a waiver of the right to review

of such determination. Id. at 2-3 (citing 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); United

States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003)).

The parties did not file objections, which relieves the Court of its obligation to review

the R&R. See Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d at 1121; Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985)

(“[Section 636(b)(1)] does not . . . require any review at all . . . of any issue that is not the

subject of an objection.”); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) (“The district judge . . . shall make a de novo

determination . . . of any portion of the magistrate judge’s disposition to which specific

Case 2:05-cv-02341-DGC Document 10 Filed 06/08/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

written objection has been made[.]”). The Court will accept the R&R and deny the Petition.

See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (stating that the district court “may accept, reject, or modify, in

whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate”); Fed. R. Civ. P.

72(b) (same).

IT IS ORDERED:

1. Magistrate Judge Hector C. Estrada’s R&R (Doc. #8) is accepted.

2. Petitioner Nashwan Ahmed Ali’s petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. #1)

is denied.

3. The Clerk of Court shall terminate this action.

DATED this 7th day of June, 2006.

Case 2:05-cv-02341-DGC Document 10 Filed 06/08/06 Page 2 of 2