Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-02030/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-02030-3/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
AmGuard Insurance Company
Defendant
Dan Carlton
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

 STIPULATION AND ORDER RE BRIEFING SCHEDULING FOR MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 

 Case No. 2:22-cv-02030-WBS-DB

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

MURPHY AUSTIN ADAMS SCHOENFELD LLP

ALEXANDER F. STUART, SBN 96141

ELLYN E. NESBIT, SBN 136398

MURPHY AUSTIN ADAMS SCHOENFELD LLP

50 West San Fernando Street, Suite 400

San Jose, CA 95113

Telephone: (916) 446-2300

Facsimile: (916) 503-4000

Email: astuart@murphyaustin.com

Email: enesbit@murphyaustin.com 

 

Attorneys for Plaintiff

DAN CARLTON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO DIVISION

DAN CARLTON, an individual

 Plaintiff,

v.

AMGUARD INSRUANCE COMPANY, a 

foreign corporation; and DOES 1 to 100, 

inclusive,

 Defendants.

Case No. 2:22-cv-02030-WBS-DB

 STIIPULATION AND ORDER RE BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

 HEARING DATE: May 28, 2024

 HEARING TIME: 1:30 p.m.

 COURTROOM: 5 - 14th floor

 

Plaintiff Dan Carlton (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant Amguard Insurance Company 

(“Defendant”) by and through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate and request the Court to 

approve their agreement for an extension of time for the opposition and reply to defendant’s 

motion for Summary Judgment filed on March 1, 2024. 

 Pursuant to Stipulation between the parties, on January 4, 2024, this Honorable Court 

issued a Scheduling Order setting forth March 1, 2024, as the last day for the filing of motions in 

this matter, and on March 1, 2024, Defendant filed and served its motion. Pursuant to the Local 

Rule 230 (Fed. R. Civ. P. 78) the deadline for filing an opposition to the Motion for Summary 

Judgment would be March 15, 2024, and the reply would be due on March 25, 2024. 

Case 2:22-cv-02030-WBS-SCR Document 17 Filed 03/06/24 Page 1 of 3
2

 STIPULATION AND ORDER RE BRIEFING SCHEDULING FOR MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 

 Case No. 2:22-cv-02030-WBS-DB

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

MURPHY AUSTIN ADAMS SCHOENFELD LLP

For reasons including the complexity of the issues, the illness of plaintiff’s counsel, 

defendant’s difficulty locating and producing documents in connection with depositions taken in 

December which defendant has promised to produce this week, and the press of other timesensitive matters, the parties desire and stipulate to mutual extension of the deadlines to file the 

opposition to the motion for summary judgment and defendant’s reply.

The parties respectfully request that the Court approve their stipulation and extend the

deadline for the filing of the Opposition to the Motion for Summary judgment by three weeks to 

and including April 5, 2024; and extend the time for the filing of a Reply to the Opposition by 

three weeks, to and including May 6, 2024. 

ATTESTATION

Concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from each of the individual(s) 

whose electronic signature is attributed below.

Dated: March 5, 2024 MURPHY AUSTIN ADAMS SCHOENFELD LLP

By:

ALEXANDER F. STUART

Attorneys for Plaintiff

DAN CARLTON

Dated: March, 2024 WILSON, ELSER, MOSKOWITZ, EDELMAN & 

DICKER, LLP 

By:/s/ John H. Podesta

JOHN H. PODESTA

Attorneys for Defendant

AMGUARD INSURANCE COMPANY 

Case 2:22-cv-02030-WBS-SCR Document 17 Filed 03/06/24 Page 2 of 3
3

 STIPULATION AND ORDER RE BRIEFING SCHEDULING FOR MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 

 Case No. 2:22-cv-02030-WBS-DB

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

MURPHY AUSTIN ADAMS SCHOENFELD LLP

ORDER

 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

1. The Stipulation is approved;

2. The briefing scheduling on the Motion for Summary Judgment which was filed on 

March 1, 2024, is as follows:

Plaintiff’s Opposition to Motion for Summary Judgment is due April 5, 2024;

Defendant’s Reply to the Opposition to Motion for summary Judgment is 

due May 6, 2024.

Dated: March 5, 2024

Case 2:22-cv-02030-WBS-SCR Document 17 Filed 03/06/24 Page 3 of 3