Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-4_06-cv-00599/USCOURTS-azd-4_06-cv-00599-2/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
National Millworks
Defendant
Ryan Smith
Plaintiff
Robert Stiemke
Defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Ryan Smith, 

Plaintiff, 

vs.

National Millworks; Robert Stiemke, 

Defendants. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV-06-599-TUC-FRZ

ORDER

Pending before the Court are two Report and Recommendations issued by Magistrate

Judge Hector C. Estrada. 

The first Report and Recommendation, filed on April 30, 2007, recommends that the Court

summarily grant Defendant National Millworks motion to dismiss because Plaintiff has failed

to oppose the motion to dismiss. The April 30, 2007 Report and Recommendation stated that

Plaintiff had 10 days to file objections, and that the failure to file objections would result in

waiver of de novo review. Plaintiff has not filed any objection and the time for doing so has

expired. As such, the Court will not accept any untimely objections as they have been

waived.

The second Report and Recommendation, filed on May 22, 2007, recommends that the

Court dismiss Defendant Robert Stiemke from the case without prejudice as he has never

been served and the time for service has expired. Magistrate Judge Estrada previously issued

an Order to Show Cause requiring Plaintiff to show good cause as to why Defendant Stiemke

Case 4:06-cv-00599-FRZ-HCE Document 16 Filed 06/15/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

should not be dismissed from the case. Plaintiff never responded. The May 22, 2007 Report

and Recommendation stated that Plaintiff had 10 days to file objections, and that the failure

to file objections would result in waiver of de novo review. Plaintiff has not filed any

objections and the time for doing so has expired. As such, the Court will not accept any

untimely objections as they have been waived.

The Court has reviewed the entire record and concludes that Magistrate Judge

Estrada’s recommendations are not clearly erroneous. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R.

Civ. P. 72; Johnson v. Zema Systems Corp., 170 F.3d 734, 739 (7th Cir. 1999); Conley v.

Crabtree, 14 F. Supp. 2d 1203, 1204 (D. Or. 1998). 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows:

(1) United States Magistrate Judge Estrada's two Report and Recommendations (Doc. #'s 13

and 15) are ACCEPTED AND ADOPTED.

(2) Defendant National Millworks motion to dismiss (Doc. #3) is GRANTED. Defendant

National Millworks is dismissed from this case with prejudice

(3) Defendant Robert Stiemke is dismissed from this case without prejudice.

(4) As all of the Defendants have been dismissed from this case, the Clerk of the Court is

DIRECTED TO ENTER JUDGMENT ACCORDINGLY AND TO CLOSE THE FILE

IN THIS MATTER.

DATED this 15th day of June, 2007.

Case 4:06-cv-00599-FRZ-HCE Document 16 Filed 06/15/07 Page 2 of 2