Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cr-00687/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cr-00687-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Bruce Barker
Defendant
USA
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIP. & [PROP.] ORDER

CR 06 0687 WHA 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

BRUCE BARKER,

Defendant.

 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CR 06 0687 WHA

STIPULATION AND

[PROPOSED] ORDER FINDING

EXCLUDABLE TIME

UNDER SPEEDY TRIAL ACT

18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(A)&(B)(iv)

The parties stipulate as follows:

The indictment in the above-captioned case was returned and filed on October 12,

2006. The defendant, Bruce Barker, appeared before the Court on November 7, 2006. 

Assistant United States Attorney Susan Badger appeared on behalf of the government. 

Cristina Arguedas appeared on behalf of the defendant, who was present and out of

custody. 

The Court noted that defendant’s Notice of Related Case is pending before United

Case 3:06-cr-00687-WHA Document 9 Filed 11/08/2006 Page 1 of 3
 Case 3:06-cr-00687-SI Document 12 Filed 11/09/06 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIP. & [PROP.] ORDER

CR 06 0687 WHA 2

States District Judge Susan Illston. Counsel for defendant advised the Court that she had

learned from Judge Illston’s chambers that the matter was still under consideration. 

Counsel also advised the Court that she needs some additional time within which to

determine whether she will be representing the defendant in this case. Counsel requested

a continuance of the matter to November 28, 2006 in order to provide reasonable time to

make that determination. The government had no objection to a continuance on those

grounds.

The parties stipulate and agree to a finding that the time from November 7, 2006

through November 28, 2006 be excluded from the time requirements of the Speedy Trial

Act in order to provide reasonable time for the defendant to obtain counsel. 18 U.S.C.

§ 3161(h)(A) & (B)(iv). 

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

DATED: November 8, 2006 KEVIN V. RYAN

United States Attorney

 /s/ 

SUSAN E. BADGER

Assistant United States Attorney

DATED: November 8, 2006 /s/ 

CRISTINA ARGUEDAS

Counsel for defendant Bruce Barker

Upon the stipulation of the parties, and for good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY

ORDERED that the time from November 7, 2006 through November 28, 2006 is

excluded from the time requirements of the Speedy Trial Act in order to provide the

///

///

Case 3:06-cr-00687-WHA Document 9 Filed 11/08/2006 Page 2 of 3
 Case 3:06-cr-00687-SI Document 12 Filed 11/09/06 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIP. & [PROP.] ORDER

CR 06 0687 WHA 3

 defendant reasonable time to obtain counsel. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(A) & (B)(iv).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

 

WILLIAM H. ALSUP

United States District Judge

Case 3:06-cr-00687-WHA Document 9 Filed 11/08/2006 Page 3 of 3

November 9, 2006

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge William Alsup

Case 3:06-cr-00687-SI Document 12 Filed 11/09/06 Page 3 of 3