Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-16-02208/USCOURTS-ca4-16-02208-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Annette Cummings
Appellant
National Labor Relations Board
Appellee

Document Text:

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-2208

ANNETTE CUMMINGS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge. 

(1:16-cv-00216-RDB)

Submitted: February 23, 2017 Decided: February 27, 2017

Before SHEDD and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit 

Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Annette Cummings, Appellant Pro Se. Helene Debra Lerner, Aaron 

David Samsel, NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Washington, D.C., 

for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 16-2208 Doc: 30 Filed: 02/27/2017 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Annette Cummings sought judicial review of a decision by the 

General Counsel of the National Labor Relations Board. Finding 

that it did not have subject matter jurisdiction to review 

prosecutorial decisions of the Board’s General Counsel, the 

district court dismissed the action. Cummings appeals this order 

and a subsequent order denying reconsideration. We have reviewed 

the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm 

for the reasons stated by the district court. Cummings v. NLRB, 

No. 1:16-cv-00216-RDB (D. Md. June 28, 2016; Oct. 20, 2016). We 

grant Cummings leave to proceed in forma pauperis, but deny her 

motion for discovery. We dispense with oral argument because the 

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Appeal: 16-2208 Doc: 30 Filed: 02/27/2017 Pg: 2 of 2