Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_01-cv-01411/USCOURTS-caed-2_01-cv-01411-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Jeffrey D. Land
Petitioner
Cheryl Pliler
Respondent

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JEFFREY D. LAND, No. CIV-S-01-1411 MCE/PAN P

Petitioner, 

v. ORDER

CHERYL PLILER, 

Respondent. 

_________________________/

Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has timely

filed a notice of appeal of this court's April 13, 2005, denial

of his application for a writ of habeas corpus. Before

petitioner can appeal this decision, a certificate of

appealability must issue. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c); Fed. R. App. P.

22(b).

A certificate of appealability may issue under 28 U.S.C.

§ 2253 “only if the applicant has made a substantial showing of

the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). 

///

Case 2:01-cv-01411-MCE -PAN Document 44 Filed 05/16/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

The court must either issue a certificate of appealability

indicating which issues satisfy the required showing or must

state the reasons why such a certificate should not issue. Fed.

R. App. P. 22(b).

For the reasons set forth in the magistrate judge’s February

10, 2005, findings and recommendations, petitioner has not made a

substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. 

Accordingly, a certificate of appealability should not issue in

this action.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 16, 2005

__________________________________

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:01-cv-01411-MCE -PAN Document 44 Filed 05/16/05 Page 2 of 2