Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_16-cv-00058/USCOURTS-caed-2_16-cv-00058-2/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Susan Fitzpatrick
Plaintiff
Tyson Foods, Inc.
Defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE 

348684 V1 

Frank C. Rothrock (SBN: 54452) frothrock@shb.com 

Naoki S. Kaneko (SBN: 252285) nkaneko@shb.com 

SHOOK, HARDY & BACON L.L.P. 

5 Park Plaza, Suite 1600 

Irvine, California 92614 

Telephone: (949) 475-1500 

Facsimile: (949) 475-0016 

Amir Nassihi (SBN 235936) 

anassihi@shb.com 

SHOOK, HARDY & BACON L.L.P. 

One Montgomery, Suite 2700 

San Francisco, California 94104 

Telephone: (415) 544-1900 

Facsimile: (415) 391-0281 

Attorneys for Defendant Tyson Foods, Inc. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SUSAN FITZPATRICK, on behalf of

herself and all others similarly situated, 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

TYSON FOODS, INC., 

Defendant. 

)

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

)

Case No. 2:16-cv-00058-JAM-EFB

Judge: Hon. John A. Mendez 

Ctrm.: 6 – 14th Floor 

ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH 

PREJUDICE 

Compl. Filed: January 11, 2016 

First Am. Compl. filed: May 16, 2016 

On September 26, 2016, the Court dismissed Plaintiff’s claims under the UCL 

(Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 17200 et seq.) and CLRA (Cal. Civ. Code § 1750 et seq.) 

without prejudice because California’s safe harbor doctrine barred Plaintiff’s claims. 

The Court granted Plaintiff twenty (20) days to file a second amended complaint to 

properly plead her claims. (ECF No. 32 at 12-13.) 

Case 2:16-cv-00058-JAM-EFB Document 35 Filed 10/05/16 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2 

[PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE 

348684 V1 

On September 30, 2016, Plaintiff notified the Court that she will not amend her 

First Amended Complaint and requested that the Court make its September 26, 2016 

Order final so Plaintiff can file an appeal. (ECF No. 33 at 2.) 

Accordingly, for the reasons set forth in the Court’s September 26, 2016 Order, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this case is dismissed in its entirety with prejudice. 

Dated: 10/4/2016 /s/ John A. Mendez____________ 

Hon. John A. Mendez United States District Court Judge 

Case 2:16-cv-00058-JAM-EFB Document 35 Filed 10/05/16 Page 2 of 2