Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_05-cr-00270/USCOURTS-cand-4_05-cr-00270-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
William Glenn Olsen
Defendant
USA
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

KEVIN V. RYAN (CSBN 118321)

United States Attorney

EUMI L. CHOI (WVBN 0722)

Acting Chief, Criminal Division

MERRY JEAN CHAN (CSBN 229254)

Assistant United States Attorney

1301 Clay Street, Suite 340S

Oakland, CA, 94612

Telephone: (510) 637-3703

Telefax: (510) 637-3724

Email: merry.chan@usdoj.gov

Attorneys for Plaintiff

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

OAKLAND DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

WILLIAM GLENN OLSEN,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CR 05-00270 MJJ

[PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING STATUS

CONFERENCE UNTIL JUNE 30, 2005, AND

EXCLUDING JUNE 9. 2005 THROUGH JUNE

30, 2005 UNDER SPEEDY TRIAL ACT, 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(A), 

FOR EFFECTIVE PREPARATION OF

COUNSEL AND UNUSUAL CASE

1. For good cause shown, and based on the parties’ stipulation, it is hereby ordered that the

status conference is continued from June 9, 2005 until June 30, 2005, at 2:00 p.m.

2. It is also ordered that the time between June 9, 2005 and June 30, 2005 is a period of delay

that is excluded from the Speedy Trial Act calculation for the effective preparation of counsel

and because the case is so unusual, 8 U.S.C. § 3161(8)(A)&(8)(B)(i)&(8)(B)(iv). This Court

finds that defense counsel requires three additional weeks to review and analyze discovery,

specifically, pertaining to creation dates of electronic files, that is time-consuming to review

and requires the aid of forensic experts, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. 

This Court also finds that because this case involves numerous batches of electronic files, and 

Case 4:05-cr-00270-MJJ Document 15 Filed 06/08/2005 Page 1 of 2 Case 4:05-cr-00270-MJJ Document 16 Filed 06/09/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

a defendant who is charged with sending child pornography to the federal prison from which

he was released, shortly after his release, it is so unusual that the defense counsel requires

additional time to effectively prepare. The ends of justice served by the granting of this

continuance and exclusion outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a

speedy trial.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED:_____________________ ________________________________

HON. MARTIN J. JENKINS

United States District Judge

(Approved as to form: ___________________________________________)

/s/ AUSA Merry Jean Chan

(Approved as to form: ___________________________________________)

/s/ David Andersen, Attorney for William Glenn Olsen 

Case 4:05-cr-00270-MJJ Document 15 Filed 06/08/2005 Page 2 of 2

6/8/2005 /s/

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

APPROVED

Judge Martin J. Jenkins

Case 4:05-cr-00270-MJJ Document 16 Filed 06/09/05 Page 2 of 2