Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-02400/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-02400-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Jerry Merkelo
Plaintiff
Hanna Merkelo-Cheberenchyk
Plaintiff
Georgina Spidell
Defendant

Document Text:

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

JERRY MERKELO, HANNA 

MERKELO-CHEBERENCHYK, 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

GEORGINA SPIDELL, 

Defendant. 

No. 2:14-cv-2400-KJM-EFB PS 

ORDER 

On November 21, 2014, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which 

were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and 

recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. No objections were filed. 

Although it appears from the file that plaintiffs’ copy of the findings and 

recommendations was returned, plaintiffs were properly served. It is the plaintiffs’ responsibility 

to keep the court apprised of their current address at all times. Pursuant to Local Rule 182(f), 

service of documents at the record address of the party is fully effective. 

 The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 

F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. 

See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). Having reviewed 

///// 

Case 2:14-cv-02400-KJM-EFB Document 4 Filed 02/11/15 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2

the file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by 

the proper analysis. 

 Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that: 

 1. The Findings and Recommendations filed November 21, 2014, are ADOPTED; 

 2. This case is remanded to the Superior Court of the State of California in and for the 

County of Sacramento; and 

3. The Clerk is directed to close this case. 

DATED: February 10, 2015. 

Case 2:14-cv-02400-KJM-EFB Document 4 Filed 02/11/15 Page 2 of 2