Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-03869/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-03869-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Eli Lilly and Company
Defendant
Martin Kelly
Plaintiff
Teresa Kelly
Plaintiff

Document Text:

American LegalNet, Inc. 

www.FormsWorkFlow.com

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TERESA KELLY and MARTIN 

KELLY, CASE NO. 3:14-cv-03869-JST 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS

Plaintiff(s),

v.

ELI LILLY AND COMPANY 

Defendant(s).

/

Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the 

following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5:

The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process:

Court Processes:

 Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4) 

 Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5) 

 Mediation (ADR L.R. 6)

(Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is 

appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any other form of ADR must participate in an 

ADR phone conference and may not file this form. They must instead file a Notice of Need for 

ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5)

Private Process:

 Private ADR (please identify process and provider) 

 

The parties agree to hold the ADR session by: 

 the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the order 

referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered. )

 other requested deadline Close of fact discovery: proposed for Feb. 2, 2016. 

Dated: February 03, 2015 

/s/ Steven B. Stein 

I attest that the concurrence in the 

filing of this document has been 

obtained by the signatory 

Attorney for Plaintiff 

 

Dated: February 03, 2015 /s/ David E. Stanley 

Attorney for Defendant 

 

CONTINUE TO FOLLOWING PAGE

Case 3:14-cv-03869-JST Document 24 Filed 02/10/15 Page 1 of 2
Rev. 12/11 

Page 2 of 2

American LegalNet, Inc. 

www.FormsWorkFlow.com

[PROPOSED] ORDER

 The parties’ stipulation is adopted and IT IS SO ORDERED. 

 The parties’ stipulation is modified as follows, and IT IS SO ORDERED. 

 

Dated: 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Jon S. Tigar

When filing this document in ECF, please be sure to use the appropriate Docket 

Event, e.g., “Stipulation and Proposed Order Selecting Mediation.”

X

February 10, 2015

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

 Judge Jon S. Tigar 

Case 3:14-cv-03869-JST Document 24 Filed 02/10/15 Page 2 of 2