Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-00860/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-00860-4/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
C. Evans
Respondent
Anthony Taylor
Petitioner

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26 Petitioner neglected to electronically file a proposed order with his request in .pdf format 1

or to submit such an order via email in wordprocessing format, as required pursuant to E.D. Local

Rule 5-137(b). 

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ANTHONY TAYLOR,

Petitioner, No. CIV S-05- 0860 DFL GGH P

vs.

C. EVANS, Warden, 

Respondent. ORDER

 /

On January 17, 2006, petitioner filed a request for extension of time, until March

22, 2006, to file petitioner’s amended pleadings. By order filed on January 19, 2006, the court

1

filed an order with reference to the further status report that had been filed on November 18,

2005, an order that had been prepared earlier, without reference to petitioner’s subsequent

January 17, 2006 request. 

In the January 19, 2006 order, the court reaffirmed the deadlines set forth in the

September 20, 2005 order, wherein the filing date for petitioner’s amended petition was set forth

as January 20, 2006. On January 19, 2006, petitioner filed a motion for reconsideration of the

January 19, 2006 order, mistakenly (but understandably) construing it as a denial of his January

Case 2:05-cv-00860-JAM-GGH Document 20 Filed 01/23/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

17, 2006 request for extension of time. The court now considers petitioner’s January 17, 2006

request for an extension of time.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that:

1. Petitioner’s January 17, 2006 request for an extension to time to file an

amended petition along with any supplemental memorandum of points and authorities is granted;

2. Petitioner must file the amended pleadings on or before March 22, 2006; 

3. Petitioner’s January 19, 2006 motion for reconsideration is vacated as

inapposite and moot; and

4. The remaining timelines for responsive and opposition or reply briefing remain

governed by the January 19, 2006 order.

DATED: 1/23/06

/s/ Gregory G. Hollows

 

GREGORY G. HOLLOWS

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

GGH:009

tayl0860.eot

Case 2:05-cv-00860-JAM-GGH Document 20 Filed 01/23/06 Page 2 of 2