Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-01509/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-01509-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Commissioner of Social Security
Defendant
Sean Michael Emmons
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1 

Emmons 

Stip. and Proposed Order for Extension - 2:15-cv-01509-EFB 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER 

United States Attorney 

DEBORAH LEE STACHEL, CSBN 230138 

Acting Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX 

Social Security Administration 

HENRY L. CHI, CSBN 265009 

Special Assistant United States Attorney 

160 Spear Street, Suite 800 

San Francisco, CA 94105 

Telephone: 415-977-8953 

Facsimile: 415-744-0134 

E-Mail: henry.chi@ssa.gov

Attorneys for Defendant 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - SACRAMENTO 

 

SEAN MICHAEL EMMONS, 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

CAROLYN W. COLVIN, 

Acting Commissioner of Social Security, 

 Defendant. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

CIVIL NO. 2:15-cv-01509-EFB 

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED 

ORDER FOR A FIRST EXTENSION OF 

TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND 

TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR 

SUMMARY JUDGMENT 

 

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties, through their respective 

counsel of record, that Defendant shall have a first extension of time of 45 days to respond to 

Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment. There is good cause for this extension because of 

Defendant’s Counsel’s workload and the holidays. Despite his diligent efforts, competing 

Case 2:15-cv-01509-EFB Document 15 Filed 01/04/16 Page 1 of 2
2 

Emmons 

Stip. and Proposed Order for Extension - 2:15-cv-01509-EFB 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

deadlines necessitate an extension, including a scheduled oral argument before the Ninth Circuit. 

Additionally, Defendant needs additional time to respond to Plaintiff’s arguments. Given these 

factors, Defendant respectfully requests an extension and Plaintiff also consents to this extension. 

The current due date is January 7, 2016. The new due date will be February 22, 2016. 

The parties further stipulate that the Court's Scheduling Order shall be modified accordingly.

 Respectfully submitted, 

Dated: December 30, 2015 /s/ Henry L. Chi for John Vincent Johnson* 

 (*by email authorization on December 30, 2015) 

 John Vincent Johnson 

Attorney for Plaintiff 

Dated: December 30, 2015 BENJAMIN B. WAGNER 

 United States Attorney 

 

 By: /s/ Henry L. Chi 

Henry L. Chi 

 Special Assistant U.S. Attorney 

 Attorneys for Defendant 

ORDER 

 APPROVED AND SO ORDERED. 

DATED: 

 EDMUND F. BRENNAN 

 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

Case 2:15-cv-01509-EFB Document 15 Filed 01/04/16 Page 2 of 2