Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-00129/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-00129-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Stanley Ferrier
Plaintiff
State of California
Defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

STANLEY FERRIER,

Plaintiff, CIV-S-06-0129 DFL GGH PS

vs.

STATE OF CALIFORNIA,

Defendant. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

By order filed September 27, 2006, plaintiff was ordered to show cause, within

ten days, why his action should not be dismissed for failure to comply with Federal Rule of Civil

Procedure 4(m). The ten day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not shown cause or

otherwise responded to the court’s order.

IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without

prejudice. See Local Rule 11-110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty

days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written

objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge's

Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the

Case 2:06-cv-00129-RRB-GGH Document 5 Filed 12/18/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951

F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: 12/18/06

/s/ Gregory G. Hollows

____________________________________

 GREGORY G. HOLLOWS

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

GGH:035

ferrier.fsc

Case 2:06-cv-00129-RRB-GGH Document 5 Filed 12/18/06 Page 2 of 2