Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-02787/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-02787-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Axiom Design Automation, Inc.
Counter-claimant
Dynetix Design Solutions, Inc.
Counter-defendant

Document Text:

FENWICK 

&

WEST LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN FRANCISCO

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING 

ADR DEADLINE CASE NO. C-06-02787-CRB 

DARRYL M. WOO (CSB NO. 100513) 

 dwoo@fenwick.com

BRYAN A. KOHM (CSB NO. 233276) 

 bkohm@fenwick.com

FENWICK & WEST LLP 

275 Battery Street, 16th Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94111 

Telephone: (415) 875-2400 

Facsimile: (415) 281-1350 

Attorneys for Defendant 

AXIOM DESIGN AUTOMATION, INC. 

James Cai (California State Bar No. 200189) 

Daniel Schein, Ph. D. (California State Bar No. 196595) 

Douglas Mackenzie (California State Bar No. 212953) 

SCHEIN & CAI LLP 

100 Century Center Court, Suite 315 

San Jose, California 95112 

Telephone: (408) 436-0789 

Facsimile: (408) 436-0758 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

DYNETIX DESIGN SOLUTIONS, INC 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

DYNETIX DESIGN SOLUTIONS, INC., 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

AXIOM DESIGN AUTOMATION, INC., 

Defendant. 

Case No. C-06-02787-CRB 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER CONTINUING DEADLINE TO 

COMPLETE ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE 

RESOLUTION 

Date of Filing: April 24, 2006 

Trial Date: None set 

Case 3:06-cv-02787-CRB Document 17 Filed 09/21/06 Page 1 of 3
FENWICK 

&

WEST LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN FRANCISCO

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING 

ADR DEADLINE 2 CASE NO. C-06-02787-CRB 

WHEREAS, Plaintiff Dynetix Design Solutions, Inc. (“Dynetix”) filed a Complaint for 

Patent Infringement on or about April 24, 2006, against Defendant AXIOM Design Automation, 

Inc. (“AXIOM”); 

WHEREAS, Plaintiff served Defendant with the Complaint on or about August 11, 2006; 

WHEREAS, Defendant filed an Answer and Counterclaims on or about August 31, 2006; 

WHEREAS, the parties have agreed to mediate the dispute and have stipulated to 

completing mediation by September 29, 2006; and 

WHEREAS, the Court entered a Stipulation and Order on or about July 31, 2006 setting 

mediation to be completed before September 29, 2006; 

WHEREAS, Dynetix began the process of obtaining new counsel after the parties 

stipulated to mediation but before mediation was scheduled; 

WHEREAS, the parties were not able to schedule mediation while Dynetix was in the 

process of obtaining new counsel; 

WHEREAS, the parties still wish to mediate the dispute and intend to do so as soon as 

possible; 

WHEREAS, the parties have initiated the process of scheduling mediation and intend to 

complete mediation no later than October 30, 2006; 

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the parties, through 

their respective attorneys of record, as follows: 

1. The deadline to complete mediation shall be continued from September 29, 2006 

to October 30, 2006. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

 FENWICK & WEST LLP 

Date: September 20, 2006 By: /s/ Bryan A. Kohm 

Bryan A. Kohm 

ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT 

AXIOM DESIGN AUTOMATION, INC. 

Case 3:06-cv-02787-CRB Document 17 Filed 09/21/06 Page 2 of 3
FENWICK 

&

WEST LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN FRANCISCO

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING 

ADR DEADLINE 3 CASE NO. C-06-02787-CRB 

 

 SCHEIN & CAI LLP 

Date: September 20, 2006 By: /s/ James Cai 

James Cai 

ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF 

DYNETIX DESIGN SOLUTIONS, INC. 

GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: September __, 2006 

By: _______________________________________ 

 The Honorable Judge Charles R. Breyer 

21

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Charles R. Breyer

Case 3:06-cv-02787-CRB Document 17 Filed 09/21/06 Page 3 of 3