Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ared-3_05-cv-00030/USCOURTS-ared-3_05-cv-00030-3/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Carol Boozer
Defendant
Dick Moore Mobile Homes
Defendant
Randy Medlock
Plaintiff

Document Text:

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS

JONESBORO DIVISION

RANDY MEDLOCK PLAINTIFF

v. No. 3:05CV00030 GH

CAROL BOOZER AND DICK

MOORE MOBILE HOMES DEFENDANTS

ORDER

Pending before the Court is plaintiff’s November 4th motion for reconsideration in which he

states that his objections to the recommendation was filed within the time limit although mailed to

the wrong court and asks that the Court rule on his objections – a copy of which he attached to the

motion.

The September 7th order adopting the two proposed findings and recommendations noted that

“[o]bjections were filed by plaintiff on September 1st” and those objections were considered by the

Court in its de novo review prior to issuance of that order. Thus, the Court has already ruled on those

objections.

Accordingly, plaintiff’s November 4th motion (#43) for reconsideration is hereby denied.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 8th day of November, 2005.

 

J. LEON HOLMES for GEORGE HOWARD, JR.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 3:05-cv-00030-GH Document 44 Filed 11/08/05 Page 1 of 1