Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-00705/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-00705-2/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Jeffrey Wrigley
Respondent
Francisco Ochoa Zaragosa
Petitioner

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

FRANCISCO OCHOA ZARAGOSA, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

v. )

)

JEFFREY WRIGLEY, )

)

Respondent. )

 )

1:06-cv-00705-AWI-DLB-HC

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS (Doc. 3)

ORDER DISMISSING PETITION

FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO

ENTER JUDGMENT

Petitioner is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se with a

Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. 

On July 17, 2006, the Magistrate Judge filed Findings and

Recommendations that the petition for writ of habeas corpus be

DISMISSED because the petition does not allege grounds that would

entitle petitioner to relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. These

Findings and Recommendations were served on all parties and

contained notice that any objections were to be filed within thirty

(30) days from the date of service of that order. On August 17,

2006, Petitioner filed a motion to extend time. On August 28,

2006, the court granted Petitioner an additional thirty (30) days

within which to respond. To date, neither party has filed

objections to the Findings and Recommendations.

Case 1:06-cv-00705-AWI-DLB Document 6 Filed 11/20/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636

(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a de novo review of the case. 

Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court concludes that

the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations are supported

by the record and proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed July 17, 2006,

are ADOPTED IN FULL; 

2. The petition for writ of habeas corpus is DISMISSED

because the petition does not allege grounds that would entitle

petitioner to relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2241; and,

3. The Clerk of Court enter judgment.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: November 19, 2006 /s/ Anthony W. Ishii 

0m8i78 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-00705-AWI-DLB Document 6 Filed 11/20/06 Page 2 of 2