Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_23-cr-00177/USCOURTS-caed-2_23-cr-00177-8/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Bradley Earl Reger
Defendant
USA
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1 STIPULATION REGARDING EXCLUDABLE TIME 

PERIODS UNDER SPEEDY TRIAL ACT

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

PHILLIP A. TALBERT 

United States Attorney 

CHRISTINA McCALL 

ROGER YANG 

Assistant United States Attorneys 

501 I Street, Suite 10-100 

Sacramento, CA 95814 

Telephone: (916) 554-2700 

Facsimile: (916) 554-2900 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

United States of America 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

BRADLEY EARL REGER, 

 Defendant. 

CASE NO. 2:23-CR-0177 TLN

STIPULATION REGARDING EXCLUDABLE 

TIME PERIODS UNDER SPEEDY TRIAL ACT; 

FINDINGS AND ORDER 

DATE: May 23, 2024 

TIME: 9:30 a.m. 

COURT: Hon. Troy L. Nunley 

STIPULATION 

Plaintiff United States of America, by and through its counsel of record, and defendant, by and 

through defendant’s counsel of record, hereby stipulate as follows: 

1. By previous order, this matter was set for status on May 23, 2024. 

2. By this stipulation, defendant now moves to continue the status conference until June 6, 

2024, at 9:30 a.m. and to exclude time between May 23, 2024, and June 6, 2024, at 9:30 a.m.under 

Local Code T4. 

3. The parties agree and stipulate, and request that the Court find the following: 

a) The government has represented that the discovery associated with this case 

includes over 19,000 pages/items of regular discovery and over 348,000 pages/items of protected 

discovery. Those items include: business records; investigative reports; recorded interviews of 

Case 2:23-cr-00177-TLN Document 57 Filed 05/13/24 Page 1 of 4
 

2 STIPULATION REGARDING EXCLUDABLE TIME 

PERIODS UNDER SPEEDY TRIAL ACT

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

alleged victims and potential witnesses; photographs; search warrant documents; Facebook and 

Google search warrant returns; travel records; and thousands of pages of scanned papers from 

search warrant executions. 

b) A continuance is requested because counsel for both parties need additional time 

for effective preparation, to conduct legal research and further investigation into the alleged 

crimes. 

c) Counsel for defendant believes the failure to grant a continuance in this case 

would deny defense counsel reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into 

account the exercise of due diligence. 

d) The government joins in the request for the continuance. 

e) Based on the above-stated findings, the ends of justice served by continuing the 

case as requested outweigh the interest of the public and the defendant in a trial within the 

original date prescribed by the Speedy Trial Act. 

f) For the purpose of computing time under the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161, 

et seq., within which trial must commence, the time period of May 23, 2024 to June 6, 2024, at 

9:30 a.m., inclusive, is deemed excludable pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 3161(h)(7)(A), B(iv) [Local 

Code T4] because it results from a continuance granted by the Court at defendant’s request on 

the basis of the Court’s finding that the ends of justice served by taking such action outweigh the 

best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. 

4. Nothing in this stipulation and order shall preclude a finding that other provisions of the 

Speedy Trial Act dictate that additional time periods are excludable from the period within which a trial 

must commence. 

/// 

/// 

/// 

/// 

/// 

/// 

Case 2:23-cr-00177-TLN Document 57 Filed 05/13/24 Page 2 of 4
 

3 STIPULATION REGARDING EXCLUDABLE TIME 

PERIODS UNDER SPEEDY TRIAL ACT

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

/// 

 

Case 2:23-cr-00177-TLN Document 57 Filed 05/13/24 Page 3 of 4
 

4 STIPULATION REGARDING EXCLUDABLE TIME 

PERIODS UNDER SPEEDY TRIAL ACT

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

Dated: May 10, 2024 PHILLIP A. TALBERT 

United States Attorney 

/s/ CHRISTINA McCALL 

 CHRISTINA McCALL 

ROGER YANG 

Assistant United States Attorneys 

Dated: May 10, 2024 /s/ TASHA CHALFANT 

KRESTA DALY 

TASHA CHALFANT 

Counsel for Defendant 

Bradley Earl Reger

ORDER 

The Court has read and considered the parties’ Stipulation. The Court ORDERS that the status 

conference be continued to June 6, 2024, at 9:30 a.m.. The Court hereby finds that the Stipulation, 

which the Court incorporates by reference into this Order, demonstrates facts that provide a basis to 

exclude time under the Speedy Trial Act pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 3161(h)(7)(A), B(iv) [Local Code T4]. 

Time is excluded under the Speedy Trial Act between May 23, 2024, and June 6, 2024, at 9:30 a.m.. 

Dated: May 10, 2024 

Troy L. Nunley

United States District Judge

Case 2:23-cr-00177-TLN Document 57 Filed 05/13/24 Page 4 of 4