Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-01704/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-01704-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Board of Prison Terms
Respondent
Rene Madrigal
Petitioner

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RENE MADRIGAL,

Petitioner, No. CIV S-07-1704 MCE KJM P

vs.

BOARD OF PRISON TERMS,

Respondent FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

By an order filed August 30, 2007, plaintiff was ordered to file an in forma

pauperis affidavit or pay the appropriate filing fees within thirty days and was cautioned that

failure to do so would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. The thirty day

period has now expired, and plaintiff has not responded to the court’s order and has not filed an

in forma pauperis affidavit or paid the appropriate filing fee. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY

RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice.

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty

days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written

objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s

Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the

Case 2:07-cv-01704-MCE -KJM Document 6 Filed 10/15/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951

F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: October 12, 2007. 

2/madi1704.fifp

Case 2:07-cv-01704-MCE -KJM Document 6 Filed 10/15/07 Page 2 of 2