Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-09-07364/USCOURTS-ca4-09-07364-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Antonio Demond Byers
Appellant
United States of America
Appellee

Document Text:

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 09-7364

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff - Appellee, 

 v. 

ANTONIO DEMOND BYERS, 

 Defendant - Appellant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Frank D. Whitney, 

District Judge. (3:01-cr-00002-FDW-3) 

Submitted: January 19, 2010 Decided: January 27, 2010 

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges. 

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Antonio Demond Byers, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 

Appeal: 09-7364 Doc: 11 Filed: 01/27/2010 Pg: 1 of 2
2 

PER CURIAM: 

Antonio Demond Byers appeals the district court’s 

order denying his motion for a reduction of sentence filed 

pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the 

record and find the district court did not abuse its discretion 

in denying the motion. See United States v. Goines, 357 F.3d 

469, 478 (4th Cir. 2004) (motion under § 3582(c) “is subject to 

the discretion of the district court”); United States v. Legree, 

205 F.3d 724, 727 (4th Cir. 2000). Thus, we affirm the district 

court’s order for the reasons stated there. See United 

States v. Byers, No. 3:01-cr-00002-FDW-3 (W.D.N.C. July 21, 

2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process. 

AFFIRMED

Appeal: 09-7364 Doc: 11 Filed: 01/27/2010 Pg: 2 of 2