Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-03103/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-03103-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Mangootha Kauravlla
Defendant
Shashi Kauravlla
Defendant
Kreeyaa LLC
Defendant
Mansoor Rahmani
Plaintiff
S & P Financial Advisors
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

S & P FINANCIAL ADVISORS, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

KREEYAA LLC, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 16-cv-03103-SK 

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

Regarding Docket No. 11

On July 5, 2016, Defendants Kreeyaa, LLC, Shashi Kauravlla and Mangootha Kauravlla

(collectively, “Defendants”) filed a motion to dismiss and noticed it for a hearing on August 24, 

2016. Under Northern District Civil Local Rule 7-3(a), Plaintiffs’ response was due by July 19, 

2016. To date, Plaintiffs S&P Financial Advisors Mansoor Rahmani (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) 

have not filed an opposition brief. Accordingly, Plaintiffs are HEREBY ORDERED TO SHOW 

CAUSE why the Court should not dismiss this case for lack of prosecution or, in the alternative, to 

grant Defendants’ motion as unopposed. Plaintiffs’ response to this Order to Show Cause shall be 

due by no later than August 19, 2016. If Plaintiffs seeks to file untimely an opposition brief, they

must submit a request to do so showing good cause for their failure to comply with the deadline 

required by the Local Rules, and must submit their proposed opposition brief with the request. If 

Plaintiffs fail to file a response to this Order to Show Cause by August 19, 2016, the Court shall 

dismiss this case without prejudice without further notice to Plaintiffs.

///

///

///

///

///

Case 3:16-cv-03103-SK Document 23 Filed 08/15/16 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

Finally, if Plaintiffs seek to file an untimely opposition brief, and if the Court grants that

request, it shall set a new deadline for Defendants to file a reply brief. The hearing set for August 

24, 2016 is VACATED, and may be reset by further Order from this Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 15, 2016

______________________________________

SALLIE KIM

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:16-cv-03103-SK Document 23 Filed 08/15/16 Page 2 of 2