Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-00618/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-00618-2/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Asset Acceptance, LLC
Defendant
George Geoffrey Kenefick
Defendant
Mundell Land and Livestock Company, Inc.
Counter Defendant
State of California Franchise Tax Board
Defendant
United States of America
Counter Claimant

Document Text:

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

MUNDELL LAND AND LIVESTOCK 

COMPANY, INC., 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

GEORGE GEOFFREY KENEFICK; 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; 

ASSET ACCEPTANCE, LLC; STATE OF 

CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TAX 

BOARD, 

Defendants. 

No. 2:14-cv-618-KJM-EFB 

ORDER 

Plaintiff’s motion for entry of default judgment came on regularly for hearing before the 

assigned magistrate judge on August 20, 2014. The matter was referred to the magistrate judge as 

provided by Local Rule 302(c)(19) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). 

 On October 14, 2014, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which 

contained notice to the parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be 

filed within fourteen days. No objections were filed. 

 The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 

F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. 

See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). Having reviewed 

Case 2:14-cv-00618-KJM-EFB Document 28 Filed 01/12/15 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2

the file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by 

the proper analysis. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 

 1. The Findings and Recommendations filed October 20, 2014, are adopted in full; 

 2. Plaintiff’s application for default judgment, ECF No. 20, is granted; 

 3. The stipulation between plaintiff and the United States, ECF No. 22-1, is approved; 

and 

 4. Judgment is entered against defendant George Kenefick, Asset Acceptance, LLC, 

and State of California Franchise Tax Board. 

DATED: January 12, 2015. 

Case 2:14-cv-00618-KJM-EFB Document 28 Filed 01/12/15 Page 2 of 2