Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-09-08086/USCOURTS-ca4-09-08086-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Marquis D. Arrington
Appellant
United States of America
Appellee

Document Text:

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-8086

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

MARQUIS D. ARRINGTON,

Defendant – Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, Chief 

District Judge. (3:06-cr-00255-JRS)

Submitted: March 30, 2010 Decided: April 28, 2010

Before SHEDD, AGEE, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Marquis D. Arrington, Appellant Pro Se. Steven Lawrence Miller, 

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 09-8086 Doc: 5 Filed: 04/28/2010 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Marquis D. Arrington appeals the district court’s 

order denying his second 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion 

for reduction of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find 

no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons 

stated by the district court. United States v. Arrington, No. 

3:06-cr-00255-JRS (E.D. Va. Oct. 27, 2009). We dispense with 

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before the court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process. 

AFFIRMED

Appeal: 09-8086 Doc: 5 Filed: 04/28/2010 Pg: 2 of 2