Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-02179/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-02179-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Max Sound Corporation
Defendant
Vedanti Systems Limited
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

Case No. 16-cv-02179-PSG

ORDER VACATING HEARING ON MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

VEDANTI SYSTEMS LIMITED,

Plaintiff,

v.

MAX SOUND CORPORATION,

Defendant.

Case No. 16-cv-02179-PSG

ORDER VACATING HEARING ON 

MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY 

INJUNCTION

(Re: Docket No. 8)

Before the court is a motion by Plaintiff Vedanti Systems Limited for a preliminary 

injunction against Defendant Max Sound Corporation.1 Max Sound has not opposed the motion;

nor has it appeared in this action at all.

2 However, because Max Sound has been served with the 

complaint,3and because the motion seeks injunctive relief, the court may not grant it until Max 

Sound consents to the jurisdiction of the undersigned magistrate judge.

4

 The court therefore 

vacates the hearing on the instant motion, currently set for Tuesday, May 31, 2016. The case will 

be reassigned to a district judge upon the resignation of the undersigned on June 3, 2016.

 

1

See Docket No. 8.

2 Max Sound’s only activity has been a letter from a corporate officer, dated May 2, 2016,

requesting an extension of the briefing schedule because the company “is currently in the process 

of retaining counsel to represent itself in this case, but has not yet done so.” Docket No. 20. Max 

Sound must appear “through a member of the bar of this Court” under Civ. L.R. 3-9(b). 

Moreover, Max Sound has offered no explanation for its delay. The request is DENIED.

3

See Docket Nos. 1, 19.

4

See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A), (c)(1); Travelers Cas. & Sur. Co. of Am. v. Brenneke, 551 F.3d 

1132, 1135 (9th Cir. 2005); Brown v. Baca, Case No. 13-cv-00745, 2013 WL 502252, at *1 n.2 

(C.D. Cal. Feb. 8, 2013).

Case 3:16-cv-02179-EMC Document 23 Filed 05/27/16 Page 1 of 2
2

Case No. 16-cv-02179-PSG

ORDER VACATING HEARING ON MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 27, 2016

_________________________________

PAUL S. GREWAL

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:16-cv-02179-EMC Document 23 Filed 05/27/16 Page 2 of 2