Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-05604/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-05604-3/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Adecco, Inc
Defendant
Shavotnae Goldsby
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SHAVOTNAE GOLDSBY,

Plaintiff,

 v.

ADECCO, INC.,

Defendant /

No. C-07-5604 MMC

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION TO MODIFY PRETRIAL

PREPARATION ORDER; VACATING

HEARING 

Before the Court is plaintiff’s “Motion to Modify Pretrial Preparation Order,” filed June

27, 2008. Defendant has filed partial opposition to the motion, to which plaintiff has replied. 

Having read and considered the papers filed in support of and in response to the motion,

the Court deems the matter suitable for decision thereon, VACATES the hearing scheduled

for August 1, 2008, and rules as follows.

In her motion, plaintiff seeks an order extending the deadline for filing her motion for

class certification from July 7, 2008 to September 22, 2008. In its response, defendant

states it does not oppose a 40-day extension of the deadline, i.e., it does not oppose the

Court’s extending the deadline to August 19, 2008, but that it opposes any further

extension.

In light of defendant’s non-opposition to an extension to August 19, 2008, and good

cause appearing for a short further extension in light of Magistrate Judge Spero’s order of

Case 3:07-cv-05604-MMC Document 27 Filed 07/28/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

July 15, 2008, the Court will extend the deadline to August 31, 2008.

To the extent plaintiff seeks an extension beyond August 31, 2008, the Court will

deny the motion, without prejudice to plaintiff’s seeking a further extension if, in light of the

subsequent course of discovery and/or any rulings that may be issued by Magistrate Judge

Spero, plaintiff can show good cause for such relief.

Accordingly, plaintiff’s motion is hereby GRANTED in part and the Pretrial

Preparation Order is amended to extend, to August 31, 2008, the deadline for plaintiff’s

filing a motion for class certification. In all other respects, the motion is DENIED without

prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 28, 2008 

MAXINE M. CHESNEY

United States District Judge

Case 3:07-cv-05604-MMC Document 27 Filed 07/28/08 Page 2 of 2