Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-07-01823/USCOURTS-ca4-07-01823-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
J. Cater Glass
Appellee
Rhonda Hogge
Appellee
Carol Martin
Appellee
LaTonya Michele McNeil

Nationwide Affinity Insurance Company of America
Appellee
Nationwide Claims Department
Appellee
Nationwide Insurance Company
Appellee
Nationwide Loss Adjusters
Appellee
Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company
Appellee
Harold C. Rhudy
Appellee
Sharron Stephen-Henley
Appellee
Arthur Walter
Appellee
Paul Yongo
Appellant

Document Text:

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-1823

PAUL YONGO,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

NATIONWIDE INSURANCE COMPANY; CAROL MARTIN;

RHONDA HOGGE, AIC; NATIONWIDE CLAIMS

DEPARTMENT; NATIONWIDE LOSS ADJUSTERS; SHARRON

STEPHEN-HENLEY; ARTHUR WALTER; NATIONWIDE

AFFINITY INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA;

NATIONWIDE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY; J. CATER

GLASS; LATONYA MICHELE MCNEIL; HAROLD C.

RHUDY,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever III,

District Judge. (5:07-cv-00094)

Submitted: November 2, 2007 Decided: November 27, 2007

Before NIEMEYER, KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Paul Yongo, Appellant Pro Se. George Lee Simpson, III, LAW OFFICE

OF GEORGE L. SIMPSON, III, Raleigh, North Carolina; Benjamin E.

Thompson, III, BROUGHTON, WILKINS, SMITH, SUGGS & THOMPSON, PLLC,

Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 07-1823 Doc: 33 Filed: 11/27/2007 Pg: 1 of 2
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Paul Yongo seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying his appeal of the magistrate judge’s order denying various

non-dispositive motions in Yongo’s civil action. This court may

exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291

(2000), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C.

§ 1292 (2000); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus.

Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order Yongo seeks to appeal

is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or

collateral order. Accordingly, we deny his motions for appointment

of counsel and for preparation of transcripts at government

expense, and we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Appeal: 07-1823 Doc: 33 Filed: 11/27/2007 Pg: 2 of 2