Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca5-15-40698/USCOURTS-ca5-15-40698-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Alfredo Bautista-Villarreal
Appellant
United States of America
Appellee

Document Text:

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-40698

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

ALFREDO BAUTISTA-VILLARREAL,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:14-CR-466-1

Before DAVIS, SMITH, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Alfredo Bautista-Villarreal 

raises an argument that is foreclosed by United States v. Morales-Mota, 704 

F.3d 410, 412 (5th Cir. 2013). In Morales-Mota, 704 F.3d at 412, we rejected 

the argument that the Texas offense of “burglary of a habitation” is broader 

than the generic, contemporary definition of “burglary of a dwelling” under 

U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(1)(A)(ii) because it defines the “owner” of a habitation as a 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

February 17, 2016

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 15-40698 Document: 00513383325 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/17/2016
No. 15-40698

2

person with a “greater right to possession of the property than the actor.” 

Accordingly, the motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, the alternative 

motion for an extension of time to file a brief is DENIED, and the judgment of 

the district court is AFFIRMED.

 Case: 15-40698 Document: 00513383325 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/17/2016