Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_13-cv-00789/USCOURTS-caed-2_13-cv-00789-8/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Eli Lilly & Company
Defendant
Angela Waldo
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

ANGELA WALDOW, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

ELI LILLY & COMPANY, 

Defendant. 

No. 2:13-CV-0789-KJM-EFB 

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE 

 On May 19, 2015, this court granted defendant’s ex parte request to amend the 

August 1, 2013 Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Order. The court vacated the deadlines set for expert 

disclosure and hearing on motions to compel. and informed the parties it would issue an amended 

scheduling order, if necessary, following the parties’ submission of their joint status conference 

statement and the scheduled June 11, 2015 status conference set by minute order on April 24, 

2015. 

 Although it appears from the file that plaintiff’s copy of the order was returned as 

undeliverable (refused; unable to forward), plaintiff was properly served. It is the plaintiff’s 

responsibility to keep the court apprised of her current address at all times. Pursuant to Local 

Rule 182(f), service of documents at the record address of the party is fully effective. 

///// 

///// 

Case 2:13-cv-00789-KJM-EFB Document 73 Filed 06/08/15 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2

 On June 4, 2016, defendant filed its status report. Defendant informed the court it 

attempted to seek plaintiff’s input by emailing, calling and sending plaintiff a draft report, but 

plaintiff did not respond. Plaintiff’s status report was due by June 4, 2015, and at this time, 

plaintiff has not filed her report. 

 Accordingly, the status conference set for June 11, 2015 is VACATED and 

plaintiff is hereby ORDERED, within fourteen (14) days of entry of this order, to show cause 

why this case should not be dismissed. 

 IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATE: June 8, 2015. 

Case 2:13-cv-00789-KJM-EFB Document 73 Filed 06/08/15 Page 2 of 2