Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_06-cr-00002/USCOURTS-azd-2_06-cr-00002-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Eva Louise Narcho
Defendant
USA
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

United States of America,

Plaintiff, 

vs.

Eva Louise Narcho, 

Defendant. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CR-06-002-PHX-SMM

ORDER

A revocation of pretrial release hearing pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §3148 and

arraignment were held on Tuesday, February 28, 2006. The Government was represented

by AUSA Darcy Cerow. Defendant was present and represented by counsel, Bruce Sterling.

Court proceedings are electronically recorded.

 Proffers and arguments are presented to the Court.

 The Court FINDS that Defendant failed to appear for a possible Change of

Plea and Sentencing on December 23, 2005 and December 27, 2005.

The Court FURTHER FINDS that Defendant tested presumptive positive for

cocaine and marijuana on December 9, 2005 by Pretrial Services.

The Court FURTHER FINDS that Defendant was instructed by Pretrial

Services to submit to urinalysis testing every Monday in Sells, Az., beginning on January 2,

2006. Defendant failed to appear and submit urine specimens on January 2, 9, 16, 23, and 30,

2006 and failed to contact Pretrial Services to make alternate arrangements.

Case 2:06-cr-00002-SMM Document 8 Filed 03/03/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

 The Court FURTHER FINDS that while Defendant may have transportation

and day-care difficulties, she is unlikely to abide by a condition of release requiring her to

refrain from illicit drug usage, submit to regular urine tests and report to Pretrial Services as

directed.

 The Court FURTHER FINDS that Defendant's illicit drug usage likely renders

her inherently unreliable and untrustworthy.

 Accordingly,

 IT IS ORDERED that Defendant shall be detained as a serious flight risk until

further order of the District Court.

 DATED this 2nd day of March, 2006.

Case 2:06-cr-00002-SMM Document 8 Filed 03/03/06 Page 2 of 2