Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-01605/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-01605-2/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Ian Dedrick
Plaintiff
Snack Factory, LLC
Defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER STAYING CASE AND 

VACATING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

CASE NO. 3:15-cv-01605-EMC

Winston & Strawn LLP

101 California Street

San Francisco, CA 94111-5802

Amanda L. Groves (SBN: 187216)

agroves@winston.com

Sean D. Meenan (SBN: 260466)

smeenan@winston.com

WINSTON & STRAWN LLP

101 California Street, 35th Floor

San Francisco, CA 94111-5802

Telephone: (415) 591-1000

Facsimile: (415) 591-1400

Kiran H. Mehta (admitted pro hac vice)

kiran.mehta@troutmansanders.com

TROUTMAN SANDERS LLP

301 S. College Street

Charlotte, NC 28202

Telephone: (704) 998-4050

Facsimile: (704) 998-4051

Attorneys for Defendant

SNACK FACTORY, LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

IAN DEDRICK, individually and on behalf of 

all others similarly situated,

Plaintiffs,

v.

SNACK FACTORY, LLC, a New Jersey 

limited liability company,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 3:15-cv-01605-EMC

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER STAYING CASE AND VACATING 

FEBRUARY 18, 2016 CASE 

MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

Case 3:15-cv-01605-EMC Document 38 Filed 02/11/16 Page 1 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 1

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER STAYING CASE AND

VACATING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

CASE NO. 3:15-cv-01605-EMC

Winston & Strawn LLP

101 California Street

San Francisco, CA 94111-5802

WHEREAS, on August 5, 2015, the parties filed a Notice of Settlement and [Proposed] 

Order Continuing Case Management Conference (the “Notice of Settlement”);

WHEREAS, the Notice of Settlement explained that the parties had reached an agreement to 

settle this action on an individual basis, contingent on final approval of a classwide settlement in 

Barron, et al. v. Snyder’s-Lance, Inc., Case No. 0:13-cv-62496-JAL (United States District Court for 

the Southern District of Florida) (“Barron”);

WHEREAS, if the class settlement is granted approval by the court in Barron, it would settle 

and release the claims of Plaintiffs and the proposed class they seek to represent in the abovecaptioned action.

WHEREAS, on September 22, 2015, the parties in Barron filed an Unopposed Motion for 

Preliminary Certification of a Class for Settlement Purposes and Approval of Notice (the “Motion 

for Preliminary Approval”);

WHEREAS, on February 4, 2016, the Barron court issued an order, stating, amongst other 

things, that the court “has reviewed the Motion [for Preliminary Approval] and is prepared to enter 

an Order granting preliminary approval of the class action settlement and leave to file a third 

amended complaint . . . [but] the dates and deadlines included in the Proposed Order are no longer 

feasible.” Accordingly, the Barron court ordered “that the Parties shall have until and including 

February 12, 2016, to submit a new proposed Order Granting Preliminary Approval of Class Action 

Settlement, and Leave to File Third Amended Complaint.”

WHEREAS, on November 10, 2015, this Court granted the parties’ stipulation to continue 

the November 19, 2015 Case Management Conference to February 18, 2016;

THEREFORE, the parties stipulate that, upon order of this Court, (1) the February 18, 2016

shall be vacated; (2) this action shall be stayed pending the court’s decision in Barron on whether to 

grant final approval of the class settlement; (3) on or before May 19, 2016, the parties shall inform 

this Court of the status of the Barron case; and (4) the parties shall provide further status reports to 

this Court at ninety day intervals thereafter.

Case 3:15-cv-01605-EMC Document 38 Filed 02/11/16 Page 2 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 2

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER STAYING CASE AND

VACATING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

CASE NO. 3:15-cv-01605-EMC

Winston & Strawn LLP

101 California Street

San Francisco, CA 94111-5802

Respectfully Submitted,

Dated: February 9, 2016 WINSTON & STRAWN LLP

By: /s/ Amanda L. Groves

Amanda L. Groves (SBN: 187216)

agroves@winston.com

Sean D. Meenan (SBN: 260466)

smeenan@winston.com

Winston & Strawn LLP

101 California Street, 35th Floor

San Francisco, CA 94111-5802

Telephone: (415) 591-1000

Facsimile: (415) 591-1400

Kiran H. Mehta (admitted pro hac vice)

kiran.mehta@troutmansanders.com

Troutman Sanders LLP

301 South College Street, Suite 3400

Charlotte, NC 28202

Telephone: (704) 998-4072

Facsimile: (704) 998-4051

Attorneys for Defendant

SNACK FACTORY, LLC

Dated: February 9, 2016 AHDOOT & WOLFSON, PC

By: /s/ Theodore W. Maya

Theodore W. Maya (SBN: 223242)

tmaya@ahdootwolfson.com

Tina Wolfson (SBN: 174806)

twolfson@ahdootwolfson.com

Robert Ahdoot (SBN: 172098)

rahdoot@ahdootwolfson.com

AHDOOT & WOLFSON, P.C.

1016 Palm Ave.

West Hollywood, California 90069

Telephone: (310) 474-9111

Facsimile: (310) 474-8585

Attorneys for Plaintiff,

IAN DEDRICK

I, Amanda L. Groves, hereby attest that the concurrence to the filing of this document has 

been obtained from each signatory hereto.

/s/ Amanda L. Groves

Case 3:15-cv-01605-EMC Document 38 Filed 02/11/16 Page 3 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 3

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER STAYING CASE AND

VACATING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

CASE NO. 3:15-cv-01605-EMC

Winston & Strawn LLP

101 California Street

San Francisco, CA 94111-5802

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Pursuant to stipulation of the parties and for good cause showing, it is hereby ordered that 

(1) the February 18, 2016 is vacated; (2) this action is stayed pending the court’s decision in Barron 

v. Snyder’s-Lance, Inc., Case No. 0:13-cv-62496 (S.D. Fla) (“Barron”) on whether to grant final 

approval of the class settlement; (3) on or before May 19, 2016, the parties shall inform the Court of 

the status of the Barron case; and (4) the parties shall provide further status reports to the Court at 

ninety day intervals thereafter.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: 

United States District Court

Honorable Edward M. Chen

The 2/18/16 CMC is reset for 5/26/16 at 9:30 a.m. An 

updated joint CMC statement shall be filed by 

5/19/16. 2/11/16

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

AS MODIFIED

Judge Edward M. Chen

Case 3:15-cv-01605-EMC Document 38 Filed 02/11/16 Page 4 of 4