Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_15-cv-00403/USCOURTS-cand-4_15-cv-00403-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Gerald Gilberti
Plaintiff
James L. Turkle Trust
Plaintiff
Wells Fargo & Co
Defendant

Document Text:

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 1 

705833757v1 STIPULATION TO DISMISS CASE PER FED. R. CIV. P. 41(a)(2), No. C-15-00403-CW 

PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW PITTMAN LLP 

BRUCE A. ERICSON #76342 

bruce.ericson@pillsburylaw.com

JEFFREY JACOBI #252884 

jeffrey.jacobi@pillsburylaw.com 

Four Embarcadero Center, 22nd Floor 

Post Office Box 2824 

San Francisco, CA 94126-2824 

Telephone: (415) 983-1000 

Facsimile: (415) 983-1200 

Attorneys for Defendant, 

WELLS FARGO & COMPANY 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

JAMES L. TURKLE TRUST and GERALD 

GILBERTI, individually and on behalf of all 

others similarly situated, 

 Plaintiff, 

 vs. 

WELLS FARGO & COMPANY, a Delaware 

Corporation, and DOES 1-100, 

 Defendants. 

 

No. C-15-000403-CW 

STIPULATION TO DISMISS CASE 

WITH PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO 

FED. R. CIV. P. 41(A)(2); AND 

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Case 4:15-cv-00403-CW Document 12 Filed 04/03/15 Page 1 of 4
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 2 

705833757v1 STIPULATION TO DISMISS CASE PER FED. R. CIV. P. 41(a)(2), No. C-15-00403-CW 

RECITALS 

A. This case (“Turkle Trust II”) is substantially similar to James L. Turkle Trust 

v. Wells Fargo & Company, Case No. C-11-06494-CW (N.D. Cal.) (“Turkle Trust I”). 

B. Turkle Trust I was dismissed in 2012. James L. Turkle Trust v. Wells Fargo 

& Co., No. C-11-6494-CW, 2012 WL 2568208 (N.D. Cal. July 2, 2012). 

C. That dismissal was appealed. 9th Cir. Docket No. 12-16629. 

D. On February 5, 2015, Magistrate Judge Corley signed and entered as an 

order in Turkle Trust II the parties’ Stipulation to Stay Case Pending Resolution of Related 

Appeal, Turkle Trust II Dkt. 8. 

E. On February 10, 2015, the panel assigned to hear the Turkle Trust I appeal 

affirmed the judgment of the district court. James L. Turkle Trust v. Wells Fargo & Co., 

___ Fed. Appx. ___, No. 12-16629, 2015 WL 528004 (9th Cir. Feb. 10, 2015). 

F. Nobody filed a petition for rehearing or hearing en banc within the time set 

by Fed. R. App. P. 35, 40 and 9th Cir. R. 35-1 to 35-3, 40-1. 

G. The Ninth Circuit’s mandate issued on March 5, 2015 and was filed in the 

district court in Turkle Trust I the same day. 

H. In light of the foregoing, the parties believe it would be appropriate to 

stipulate to the dismissal of Turkle Trust II. 

STIPULATION 

Accordingly, all parties, through their counsel of record, hereby stipulate and 

request that the Court enter an order pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(2) dismissing this 

action (Turkle Trust II) with prejudice as to the named plaintiffs only, each side to bear its 

own attorneys’ fees and costs. 

Dated: April 1, 2015. 

Case 4:15-cv-00403-CW Document 12 Filed 04/03/15 Page 2 of 4
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 3 

705833757v1 STIPULATION TO DISMISS CASE PER FED. R. CIV. P. 41(a)(2), No. C-15-00403-CW 

ROBERT C. SCHUBERT 

WILLEM F. JONCKHEER 

NOAH SCHUBERT 

SCHUBERT JONCKHEER & KOLBE LLP 

Three Embarcadero Center, Suite 1650 

San Francisco, CA 94111 

EDWIN C. SCHREIBER 

ERIC A. SCHREIBER 

SCHREIBER & SCHREIBER, INC. 

16501 Ventura Boulevard, Suite 401 

Encino, CA 91436-2068 

By /s/ Willem F. Jonckheer 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

Dated: April 1, 2015. 

Pursuant to N.D. Cal. Civ. L.R. 5-1(i)(3), the undersigned filer of this document 

attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from the other 

Signatory to this document. 

PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW PITTMAN LLP 

BRUCE A. ERICSON 

JEFFREY JACOBI 

Four Embarcadero Center, 22nd Floor 

Post Office Box 2824 

San Francisco, CA 94126-2824 

By /s/ Bruce A. Ericson 

Bruce A. Ericson 

Attorneys for Defendant, 

WELLS FARGO & COMPANY 

Case 4:15-cv-00403-CW Document 12 Filed 04/03/15 Page 3 of 4
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 4 

705833757v1 STIPULATION TO DISMISS CASE PER FED. R. CIV. P. 41(a)(2), No. C-15-00403-CW 

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

All parties hereto having so stipulated, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY 

ORDERED that, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(2), this action (Turkle Trust II) is hereby 

dismissed with prejudice as to the named plaintiffs only, each side to bear its own 

attorneys’ fees and costs. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: April __, 2015. 

 

 Hon. Claudia Wilken 

 Senior United States District Judge 

3

Case 4:15-cv-00403-CW Document 12 Filed 04/03/15 Page 4 of 4