Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01291/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01291-2/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Peter Fong
Plaintiff
Sut Fong
Plaintiff
U.S. Bancorp
Defendant
U.S. Bank National Association
Defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

CASE NO. 2:22-cv-01291-MCE-KJN

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE REPLY

Lisa Simonetti (SBN 165996)

GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP

1840 Century Park East, Suite 1900

Los Angeles, CA 90067

Telephone: (310) 586-7824

Facsimile: (310) 365-5717

simonettil@gtlaw.com

Deepi Miller (SBN 272497)

Taylor Hall (SBN 339834)

GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP

1201 K Street, Suite 1100

Sacramento, CA 95814-3938

Telephone: (916) 442-1111

Facsimile: (916) 448-1709

millerde@gtlaw.com

hallt@gtlaw.com

Attorneys for Defendant

U.S. BANCORP and

U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

PETER FONG, individually and on behalf of all 

others similarly situated, and

SUT FONG, individually and on behalf of all 

others similarly situated,

Plaintiffs,

v.

U.S. BANCORP, and

U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION,

Defendants.

CASE NO. 2:22-cv-01291-MCE-KJN

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND 

DEFENDANTS’ TIME TO FILE REPLY TO 

PLAINTIFFS’ OPPOSITION TO 

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO COMPEL 

ARBITRATION AND DISMISS OR, 

ALTERNATIVELY, STAY PROCEEDINGS

Complaint Filed: July 21, 2022

[EDCA Local Rule 144]

Case 2:22-cv-01291-DC-CSK Document 23 Filed 10/12/22 Page 1 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1 CASE NO. 2:22-cv-01291-MCE-KJN

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE REPLY 

Plaintiffs PETER FONG and SUT FONG and Defendants U.S. BANCORP and U.S. BANK 

NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, by and through their designated counsel, hereby state as follows: 

WHEREAS, Defendants filed their Motion to Compel Arbitration on September 14, 2022; 

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs timely filed their Opposition to Defendants’ Motion on September 28, 2022;

WHEREAS, Counsel for Defendants represent that they became aware on October 6, 2022, that the 

legal holiday on October 10, 2022, is also a bank holiday, such that Defendants are closed on October 10, 

which closure will impact Defendants’ ability to finalize their Reply to the Motion to Compel Arbitration

(“Reply”); 

WHEREAS, it is Defendants’ position that Plaintiffs are not prejudiced by the extension as they do 

not have any further responsive deadline, and because the Court previously submitted the Motion on the 

briefs, alleviating the need to prepare for any upcoming oral argument; 

WHEREAS, Defendants file this Stipulation and Proposed Order pursuant to Eastern District Local 

Rule 144 and Fed. R. Civ. P. 6, with the understanding the Court must approve any extension; 

WHEREAS, Defendants have not requested any previous extension relating to their Reply; and

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs dispute and do not join Defendants’ representations and positions above but, 

as a courtesy, agree to an extension for Defendants to file their Reply by October 12, 2022, 

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED THAT the deadline for Defendants to file a Reply

to Plaintiffs’ Opposition to Defendants’ Motion to Compel Arbitration is October 12, 2022, one day after 

the current deadline.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Dated: October 7, 2022 CALABRO LAW OFFICE

By: /s/ J. Toji Calabro 

 J. Toji Calabro 

 Attorneys for Plaintiffs

 PETER FONG and SUT FONG

Case 2:22-cv-01291-DC-CSK Document 23 Filed 10/12/22 Page 2 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2 CASE NO. 2:22-cv-01291-MCE-KJN

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE REPLY 

DATED: October 7, 2022 GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP

 By: /s/ Deepi Miller Lisa Simonetti

Deepi Miller

Taylor Hall

 Attorneys for Defendants 

U.S. BANCORP and U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION

ATTESTATION OF FILER

I, Deepi Miller, am the ECF user whose ID and password are being used to file this 

Stipulation in compliance with Local Rule 131(e). I hereby attest that the concurrence of 

the filing of this document has been obtained from each of the other signatories indicated 

by a conformed signature (/s/) within this document.

DATED: October 7, 2022 By: /s/ Deepi Miller

 Deepi Miller

Case 2:22-cv-01291-DC-CSK Document 23 Filed 10/12/22 Page 3 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3 CASE NO. 2:22-cv-01291-MCE-KJN

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE REPLY 

ORDER

The Court, having considered the Stipulation to Extend Time to File Reply to Plaintiffs’ Opposition 

to Defendants’ Motion to Compel Arbitration and Dismiss or, Alternatively, Stay Proceedings, and for 

good cause shown, ORDERS the following: 

The Stipulation to Extend Time is GRANTED. Defendants’ deadline for responding to Plaintiffs’ 

Opposition is October 12, 2022, rather than October 11, 2022. 

Defendants’ unopposed Motion for Extension of Time (ECF No. 20) is DENIED as moot. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: October 12, 2022 

Case 2:22-cv-01291-DC-CSK Document 23 Filed 10/12/22 Page 4 of 4