Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-09-07515/USCOURTS-ca4-09-07515-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Keith Harris
Appellant
United States of America
Appellee

Document Text:

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 09-7515

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff - Appellee, 

 v. 

KEITH HARRIS, 

 Defendant - Appellant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of North Carolina, at New Bern. Louise W. Flanagan, 

Chief District Judge. (5:06-cr-00100-FL-2) 

Submitted: January 14, 2010 Decided: January 21, 2010 

Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. 

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Keith Harris, Appellant Pro Se. Anne Margaret Hayes, Rudolf A. 

Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States Attorneys, Raleigh, North 

Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 

Appeal: 09-7515 Doc: 14 Filed: 01/21/2010 Pg: 1 of 2
2 

PER CURIAM: 

 Keith Harris appeals a district court order denying 

his motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. 

§ 3582(c)(2) (2006). The district court concluded Harris was 

not entitled to a reduction because after considering Amendment 

706 to the Sentencing Guidelines, Harris’ range of imprisonment 

remained the same, the mandatory minimum sentence. We have 

reviewed the record and find no error. Accordingly, we affirm. 

We deny Harris’ motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense 

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before the court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process. 

AFFIRMED 

Appeal: 09-7515 Doc: 14 Filed: 01/21/2010 Pg: 2 of 2