Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-00930/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-00930-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Bank of America
Defendant
Robert Lee Jackson
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ROBERT LEE JACKSON, No. CIV.S-05-0930 DFL DAD PS

Plaintiff,

v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

BANK OF AMERICA,

Defendant.

 /

Plaintiff is proceeding in this action pro se and in forma

pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. The matter was referred to a

United States Magistrate Judge by Local Rule 72-302(c)(21) pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).

By order filed October 21, 2005, plaintiff’s complaint was

dismissed and twenty days leave to amend was granted. The twenty day

period has now expired, and plaintiff has not filed an amended

complaint or otherwise responded to the court’s order. Accordingly,

the court HEREBY RECOMMENDS that this action be dismissed without

prejudice. See L.R. 11-110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

Case 2:05-cv-00930-DFL-DAD Document 4 Filed 11/18/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the

United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the

provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Within twenty days after being

served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file

written objections with the court. Such a document should be

captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and

Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file

objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the

District Court’s order. See Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir.

1991).

DATED: November 17, 2005.

DAD:lg

ddad1/orders.prose/jackson0930.fta

Case 2:05-cv-00930-DFL-DAD Document 4 Filed 11/18/05 Page 2 of 2