Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_10-cv-02409/USCOURTS-cand-3_10-cv-02409-3/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Aurora Loan Services LLC
Defendant
Dorothy L. Turner
Plaintiff

Document Text:

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DOROTHY L. TURNER,

Plaintiff,

 v.

AURORA LOAN SERVICES LLC, and

any and all persons unknown, claiming any

legal right, title, estate, lien, or interest in

the property described in the complaint

adverse to Plaintiff’s title, or any cloud on

Plaintiff’s title thereto, and DOES 1

through 50, inclusive,

Defendants. /

No. C 10-02409 WHA

ORDER REGARDING

DEFENDANTS’ RESPONSE TO

THE ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

On July 19, 2010, an order to show case was issued due to pro se plaintiff Dorothy L.

Turner’s failure to file a timely opposition brief to defendants’ pending motion to dismiss (Dkt.

No. 15). The order to show cause specifically noted that defendants had properly served notice of

the motion and the August 5 hearing date on plaintiff Turner via Federal Express overnight

delivery, based upon declarations submitted with their motion (Dkt. No. 5, 13). Plaintiff was

ordered to respond by August 5.

Defendants now wish to correct the record. After checking their Federal Express shipping

receipts, defendants are now unsure whether plaintiff actually received these documents and knew

that a motion to dismiss was pending (Dkt. No. 16). They have therefore re-noticed the hearing

on the motion and sent plaintiff a new Federal Express mailing containing the new hearing date.

Case 3:10-cv-02409-WHA Document 17 Filed 07/21/10 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

In light of defendants’ error and corrective actions, plaintiff does not need to submit a

response to the order to show cause filed by the Court on July 19. That order is VACATED. 

Plaintiff need only focus on filing a timely opposition brief to defendants’ pending motion to

dismiss. Under the 35-day calendar, plaintiff’s opposition brief must be filed with the Court no

later than AUGUST 5, 2010. Defendants shall ensure that plaintiff receives a copy of this order

and that all documents pertaining to the pending motion have been properly served on and

received by plaintiff.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 21, 2010. WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:10-cv-02409-WHA Document 17 Filed 07/21/10 Page 2 of 2