Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-01378/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-01378-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Amtrak
Cross Claimant
City of Sacramento
Cross Defendant
Leslie Pelling
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-1-

ORDER ON JOINT STIPULATED MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT AGAINST DEFENDANT NATIONAL 

RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION ONLY, WITH PREJUDICE, PURSUANT TO FRCP RULE 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), AND TO 

DISMISS CROSS-CLAIMANT’S CROSS-CLAIM AGAINST THE CITY OF SACRAMENTO PURSUANT TO FRCP RULE 

41(a)(1)(A)(ii) and 41(c)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LESLIE PELLING,

Plaintiff,

v.

AMTRAK, INC. and CITY OF 

SACRAMENTO, 

Defendants. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: 2:15-cv-01378-MCE-KJN

ORDER ON JOINT STIPULATED 

MOTION TO DISMISS 

PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT 

AGAINST DEFENDANT 

NATIONAL RAILROAD 

PASSENGER CORPORATION 

ONLY, WITH PREJUDICE, 

PURSUANT TO FRCP RULE 

41(a)(1)(A)(ii), AND TO DISMISS 

CROSS-CLAIMANT’S CROSS- CLAIM AGAINST THE CITY OF 

SACRAMENTO PURSUANT TO 

FRCP RULE 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) and 

41(c)

THE COURT, having reviewed and approved the Joint Stipulated Motion to 

Dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint against Defendant National Railroad Passenger 

Corporation only, with prejudice, pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 

41(a)(1)(A)(ii), and to dismiss Cross-Claimant National Railroad Passenger 

Corporation’s cross-claim against Cross-Defendant the City of Sacramento, pursuant 

to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) and 41(c), orders as 

follows:

Case 2:15-cv-01378-MCE-KJN Document 19 Filed 01/11/17 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-2-

ORDER ON JOINT STIPULATED MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT AGAINST DEFENDANT NATIONAL 

RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION ONLY, WITH PREJUDICE, PURSUANT TO FRCP RULE 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), AND TO 

DISMISS CROSS-CLAIMANT’S CROSS-CLAIM AGAINST THE CITY OF SACRAMENTO PURSUANT TO FRCP RULE 

41(a)(1)(A)(ii) and 41(c)

IT IS ORDERED THAT the Joint Stipulated Motion to Dismiss is approved. 

The Court dismisses Plaintiff’s Civil Complaint in United States District Court 

Case Number 2:15-CV-01378-MEC-KJN only as to Defendant NATIONAL 

RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION, service mark AMTRAK, erroneously 

sued and served as Amtrak, Inc., with prejudice. Plaintiff and Defendant

NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION, service mark 

AMTRAK, each shall waive and bear their own costs, expenses, and attorneys’ fees 

with respect to any claims they have or had against each other. 

The Court also dismisses Cross-Claimant NATIONAL RAILROAD 

PASSENGER CORPORATION, service mark AMTRAK’s cross-claim in United 

States District Court Case Number 2:15-CV-01378-MEC-KJN against CrossDefendant the CITY OF SACRAMENTO, with each side to waive and bear its own 

attorneys’ fees, costs, and expenses. The CITY OF SACRAMENTO shall not file 

any adverse action against NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER 

CORPORATION, service mark AMTRAK, arising from or related to Plaintiff’s 

claims in United States District Court Case Number 2:15-CV-01378-MEC-KJN.

The case remains pending in all other respects.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 10, 2017

Case 2:15-cv-01378-MCE-KJN Document 19 Filed 01/11/17 Page 2 of 2