Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-00968/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-00968-8/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Bank of America, N.A.
Defendant
Clear Recon Corp.
Defendant
Stephen Jackson
Plaintiff
Stewart Title
Defendant

Document Text:

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

STEPHEN JACKSON 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

CLEAR RECON CORP., BANK OF 

AMERICA, N.A., and STEWART TITLE, 

Defendants. 

No. 2:15-cv-00968 TLN AC 

ORDER 

 On July 28, 2016, after plaintiff failed to timely respond to defendants’ motion to dismiss, 

this court ordered plaintiff to show cause why the complaint should not be dismissed with 

prejudice for failure to prosecute. ECF No. 45. When plaintiff failed to respond to the Order to 

Show Cause, the undersigned issued Findings and Recommendations on August 12, 2016, 

recommending dismissal of this case for failure to prosecute. ECF No. 47. Because it appears 

that plaintiff’s Opposition to the Motion to Dismiss was filed on August 11, 2016, ECF No. 46, 

the Findings and Recommendations will be vacated and the Order to Show Cause discharged. 

 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AS FOLLOWS: 

1. The Order to Show Cause dated July 28, 2016 (ECF. No. 45) is discharged; 

2. The Findings and Recommendations filed on August 12, 2016 (ECF No. 47) are 

withdrawn; 

Case 2:15-cv-00968-TLN-AC Document 48 Filed 08/17/16 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2

3. Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 42) is taken under submission for determination 

by the court. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: August 16, 2016 

Case 2:15-cv-00968-TLN-AC Document 48 Filed 08/17/16 Page 2 of 2