Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca8-15-02234/USCOURTS-ca8-15-02234-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Nebraska Public Power District
Appellee
Nit Wang
Appellant

Document Text:

United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 15-2234

___________________________

Nit Wang

lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant

v.

Nebraska Public Power District

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee

____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the District of Nebraska - Lincoln

____________

 Submitted: March 18, 2016

Filed: April 26, 2016 

[Unpublished]

____________

Before GRUENDER, ARNOLD, SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges. 

____________

PER CURIAM.

Nit Wang appeals the adverse judgment entered by the district court1

 after a jury

trial. He argues that the district court erred by misrepresenting evidence when

1

The Honorable Joseph F. Bataillon, United States District Judge for the District

of Nebraska.

Appellate Case: 15-2234 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/26/2016 Entry ID: 4391998 
responding to jury questions. We cannot address the merits of this argument, as Wang

has not provided a transcript of the trial proceedings. See Meroney v. Delta Int’l

Mach. Corp., 18 F.3d 1436, 1437 (8th Cir. 1994) (although failure to provide

complete transcript did not deprive court of jurisdiction, it did constitute grounds for

dismissing appeal where lack of trial transcript prevented any meaningful review of

issues raised by appellant); see also Fed. R. App. P. 10(b)(2) (describing appellant’s

responsibility to provide transcript).

Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal.

______________________________

-2-

Appellate Case: 15-2234 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/26/2016 Entry ID: 4391998