Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-01503/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-01503-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Copasetik Recordings
Defendant
Digital Music Group, Inc.
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

The failure of one or more of the parties to 1

participate in the preparation of the Joint Status Report does

not excuse the other parties from their obligation to timely file

a status report in accordance with this Order. In the event a

party fails to participate as ordered, the party timely

submitting the status report shall include a declaration

explaining why it was unable to obtain the cooperation of the

other party or parties.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DIGITAL MUSIC GROUP, INC., )

A Delaware Corporation, ) 2:07-cv-01503-GEB-GGH

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) ORDER CONTINUING STATUS

) (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING)

COPASETIK RECORDINGS, an entity ) CONFERENCE

unknown organized under the laws )

of the United Kingdom. )

)

Defendant. )

)

Plaintiff’s Status Report filed October 15, 2007, reveals

this case is not ready to be scheduled. Therefore, the Status

(Pretrial Scheduling) Conference set for October 29, 2007 is continued

to January 22, 2008, at 9:00 a.m. A further joint status report shall

be filed no later than January 8, 2008.1

Plaintiff is hereby notified that this action may be

dismissed without prejudice under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m) if Defendant

Copasetik Recordings is not served by December 11, 2007. To avoid

dismissal, a proof of service shall be filed for Defendant Copasetik

Case 2:07-cv-01503-GEB-GGH Document 8 Filed 10/25/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

no later than January 8, 2008. 

If Plaintiff believes it has good cause to justify extension

of Rule 4(m)’s 120-day service period for Defendant Copasetik, it

shall file a declaration no later than January 8, 2008, showing "good

cause" why the action should not be dismissed without prejudice. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 24, 2007

 

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.

United States District Judge

Case 2:07-cv-01503-GEB-GGH Document 8 Filed 10/25/07 Page 2 of 2