Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-02071/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-02071-2/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Patrick Dean Pearson
Petitioner
D. Sisto
Respondent

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

PATRICK DEAN PEARSON, No. CIV S-07-2071-MCE-CMK-P

Petitioner, 

vs. ORDER

D. SISTO,

Respondent.

 /

Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this petition for a writ of

habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Pending before the court are petitioner’s

applications for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Docs. 2 and 5). Petitioner has not, however,

submitted a “. . . certification from the warden or other appropriate officer of the place of

confinement showing the amount of money or securities that the petitioner has in any account in

the institution” as required by Rule 3(a)(2) of the Federal Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases. 

This requirement may be satisfied by having the appropriate prison official complete the

certificate portion of the form application or by submitting a certified copy of petitioner’s prison

trust account statement. 

/ / /

Case 2:07-cv-02071-MCE -CMK Document 10 Filed 12/28/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

On October 4, 2007, and October 18, 2007, the court issued orders providing

petitioner the opportunity to submit the required certification or the appropriate filing fee. 

Petitioner was warned that failure to comply with this order may result in the dismissal of this

action. See Local Rule 11-110. On October 29, 2007, petitioner submitted a letter to the court

indicating that he submitted the required certification to prison officials on October 10, 2007, for

mailing to the court. The docket, however, reflects that the only documentation received from

petitioner since the October 18, 2007, order relates to petitioner’s consent to magistrate judge

jurisdiction. No certification has been received. Petitioner will be provided another opportunity

to submit the required certification or the appropriate filing fee. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Petitioner shall submit within 30 days of the date of this order, a

certification as required by Rule 3(a)(2), or the appropriate filing fee; and

2. The Clerk of the Court is directed to forward to petitioner the court’s form

application to proceed in forma pauperis by a prisoner. 

DATED: December 27, 2007

______________________________________

CRAIG M. KELLISON

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:07-cv-02071-MCE -CMK Document 10 Filed 12/28/07 Page 2 of 2