Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca10-91-01203/USCOURTS-ca10-91-01203-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Denver Police Department
Appellee
Robert H. Ketchum
Appellant

Document Text:

FILED 

Uruted States Courr of Appeals 

Tenth Circuit 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

~ CIRCUIT 

AUG 131991 

&OBERT L. HOECKER 

Clerk 

ROBERT H. KETCHUM, also known 

as Jim Ehler, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v. 

DENVER POLICE DEPARTMENT, named 

as: City and County of Denver 

Police, 

Defendant-Appellee. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

ORDER AND JCJDGMEN'l'* 

No. 91-1203 

(D. Colorado) 

(D.C. No. 91-F-859) 

Before ANDERSON, TACBA, and BRORBY, Circuit Judges. 

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel 

has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially 

assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 

34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The cause is therefore ordered 

submitted without oral argument. 

Robert H. Ketchum appeals from a dismissal of the latest one 

of his multiple actions claiming that he was falsely arrested for 

"begging" and "urinating in public," among other things. He asks 

* This order and judgment has no precedential value and shall 

not be cited, or used by any court within the Tenth Circuit, 

except for purposes of establishing the doctrines of the law of 

the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppal. 10th Cir. R. 

36.3. 

Appellate Case: 91-1203 Document: 010110132049 Date Filed: 08/19/1991 Page: 1 
us not to decide this appeal until his petition for writ of 

certiorari pending with the Supreme Court with respect to his 

earlier action is decided. 

We AFFIRM the district court's dismissal of this action 

substantially on the grounds and for the reasons set forth in its 

order of May 21, 1991. The mandate shall issue forthwith. 

-2-

ENTERED FOR THE COURT 

Stephen H. Anderson 

Circuit Judge 

Appellate Case: 91-1203 Document: 010110132049 Date Filed: 08/19/1991 Page: 2