Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_08-cv-03789/USCOURTS-cand-4_08-cv-03789-4/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Michael J. Astrue
Defendant
John Coleman
Plaintiff

Document Text:

UNITED 

STATES 

DISTRICT 

COURT

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

C 08-03789

ORDER SETTING MOTION HEARING FOR (1) PLAINTIFF’S APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS AND (2) DEFENDANT’S

MOTION FOR RELIEF UNDER RULE 60(B)

UNITED 

STATES 

DISTRICT 

COURT

For the Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Northern District of California

Oakland Division

JOHN COLEMAN,

Plaintiff,

v.

MICHAEL J. ASTRUE,

Defendant(s).

_____________________________________/

No. C 08-03789 LB

ORDER SETTING MOTION

HEARING FOR (1) PLAINTIFF’S

APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF

MANDAMUS AND (2) DEFENDANT’S

MOTION FOR RELIEF UNDER

RULE 60(B)

On January 13, 2010, Plaintiff filed a letter alleging that Defendant Social Security

Administration failed to comply with Judge Brazil’s August 7, 2009 Order on Plaintiff’s and

Defendant’s cross-motions for summary judgment (Dkt. # 38). In response, the Court issued an

Order on February 23, 2010 construing Plaintiff’s filing as an Application for a Writ of Mandamus. 

(Dkt. #40 at 2.) On April 20, 2010, Defendant filed a Motion for Relief Under Rule 60(b) and

noticed the hearing for July 1, 2010 at 11:00 a.m. (Dkt. # 47). The Court HEREBY SETS oral

argument on Plaintiff’s Application for a Writ of Mandamus for the same hearing date and time.

On May 11, 2010, Plaintiff filed a letter requesting the Court to consider his April 28, 2010

filing as a Reply to Defendant’s Opposition to Plaintiff’s Application for a Writ of Mandamus and as

Case 4:08-cv-03789-LB Document 51 Filed 05/12/10 Page 1 of 2
UNITED 

STATES 

DISTRICT 

COURT

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

C 08-03789

ORDER SETTING MOTION HEARING FOR (1) PLAINTIFF’S APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS AND (2) DEFENDANT’S

MOTION FOR RELIEF UNDER RULE 60(B)

2

UNITED 

STATES 

DISTRICT 

COURT

For the Northern District of California

an Opposition to Defendant’s Motion for Relief Under Rule 60(b). (Dkt. #50 at 1.) The Court will

consider Plaintiff’s April 28, 2010 filing accordingly. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-3, Defendant

may file a Reply by June 17, 2010.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 12, 2010 _______________________________

LAUREL BEELER

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 4:08-cv-03789-LB Document 51 Filed 05/12/10 Page 2 of 2