Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_16-cv-00029/USCOURTS-caed-1_16-cv-00029-3/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
ADT LLC
Defendant
Edher Flores
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

On November 22, 2016, the Court conducted the mid-discovery status conference. At the 

conference counsel agreed that by the end of next week, the defendant will produce all electronic 

time records for all employees in California held by it or within its control. In addition, by the end 

of next week, the defendant will produce a random sample—previously selected by the plaintiff—of 

electronic payroll records and GPS records for all employees in California. Likewise, the defendant 

will confirm as soon as possible that it will produce deponents on December 5, 2016, in response to 

the Fed.R.Civ.P. 30(b)(6) notice served by the plaintiff. Finally, by the end of next week, counsel 

will confirm the plaintiff’s availability for deposition within the next few weeks.

Though counsel requested additional time to file the motion for class certification, the Court 

refused to entertain this request at this time based upon the lack of showing of good cause (See the 

Court’s order dated 8/3/16 (Doc. 13). However, the Court will entertain a stipulation to extend the 

deadline in the future, if counsel demonstrate they acted diligently to complete the discovery noted 

EDHER FLORES, et al.,

 Plaintiffs,

v.

ADT LLC,

Defendant.

Case No.: 1:16-cv-00029 AWI JLT

ORDER AFTER MID-DISCOVERY STATUS 

CONFERENCE

Case 1:16-cv-00029-AWI-JLT Document 20 Filed 11/22/16 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

here and whatever other discovery remains outstanding. Thus, the Court ORDERS:

1. No later than December 2, 2016, the defendant SHALL produce to the plaintiff the 

electronic time records within its control for all employees in California;

2. No later than December 2, 2016, the defendant SHALL produce to the plaintiff a 

random sample taken from all employees in California (previously selected by the plaintiff) of 

electronic payroll records within its control;

3. No later than December 2, 2016, the defendant SHALL produce to the plaintiff a 

random sample taken from all employees in California (previously selected by the plaintiff) of 

electronic GPS records within its control;

4. Immediately, but no later than December 1, 2016, the defendant SHALL notify 

counsel for the plaintiff of whether it will produce deponents responsive to the deposition notice 

issued under Fed. R. Civ.P. 30(b)(6). Failure to produce the deponents without a legally sufficient 

basis, will justify the plaintiff filing an immediate motion to compel. Plaintiff is relieved from any 

further duty to meet and confer related to this discovery;

5. Immediately, but no later than December 1, 2016, the plaintiff SHALL notify 

counsel for the plaintiff on available dates for deposition within the next few weeks;

6. At this time, the request to amend the case schedule is DENIED without prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: November 22, 2016 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:16-cv-00029-AWI-JLT Document 20 Filed 11/22/16 Page 2 of 2