Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00236/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00236-6/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Jason Saunders
Petitioner
James Yates
Respondent

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

U.S. District Court

 E. D. California cd 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JASON SAUNDERS, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

)

v. )

)

)

JAMES YATES, )

)

Respondent. )

 )

1:05-CV-0236 REC LJO HC

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND 

RECOMMENDATION 

[Doc. #16]

ORDER DISMISSING PETITION FOR WRIT

OF HABEAS CORPUS

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT

TO ENTER JUDGMENT 

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. 

On November 10, 2005, the Magistrate Judge issued a Findings and Recommendation that

recommended the petition for writ of habeas corpus be DISMISSED for failure to state a claim with

sufficient specificity and for failure to comply with Rule 2(c)(4) of the Rules Governing Section

2254 Cases. This Findings and Recommendation was served on all parties and contained notice that

any objections to the Findings and Recommendation were to be filed within thirty (30) days of the

date of service of the order. Over thirty (30) days have passed and no party has filed objections.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a de

Case 1:05-cv-00236-REC-LJO Document 17 Filed 12/30/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

U.S. District Court

 E. D. California cd 2

novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds that the Findings

and Recommendation is supported by the record and proper analysis. Petitioner was given several

opportunities to cure the defects in his petition by filing an amended petition, but he failed to do so. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendation issued November 10, 2005, is ADOPTED IN FULL; 

2. The petition for writ of habeas corpus is DISMISSED without prejudice; and

3. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to enter judgment.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: December 29, 2005 /s/ Robert E. Coyle 

668554 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:05-cv-00236-REC-LJO Document 17 Filed 12/30/05 Page 2 of 2