Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-09-07888/USCOURTS-ca4-09-07888-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
GEO Group, Incorporated
Appellee
Frederick Hines
Appellant

Document Text:

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-7888

FREDERICK HINES,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

GEO GROUP, INCORPORATED,

Defendant – Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever III, 

District Judge. (5:08-ct-03056-D)

Submitted: April 30, 2010 Decided: May 11, 2010

Before MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Frederick Hines, Appellant Pro Se. Robert T. Numbers, II, 

Winston-Salem, North Carolina, for Appellee. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 09-7888 Doc: 25 Filed: 05/11/2010 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Frederick Hines appeals the district court’s orders

denying relief on his complaint, which alleged violations of (1) 

the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, 42 U.S.C. § 12101 

to § 12213 (2006), (2) Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 

1973, 29 U.S.C. § 794 (2006), (3) his Eighth Amendment right to

reasonable medical care, and (4) North Carolina negligence laws, 

and denying his motion for appointment of counsel. We have 

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, 

we deny Hines’s motion for appointment of counsel and motion “to 

hear full and original record,” and affirm for the reasons 

stated by the district court. Hines v. GEO Group, Inc., No. 

5:08-ct-03056-D (E.D.N.C. Dec. 23, 2008; Sept. 24, 2009; 

Sept. 30, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the 

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before the court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Appeal: 09-7888 Doc: 25 Filed: 05/11/2010 Pg: 2 of 2