Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_10-cv-00106/USCOURTS-caed-1_10-cv-00106-2/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
City Police Department
Defendant
P.P.I.C. U.S.A., Inc.
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

P.P.I.C. U.S.A., Inc., )

 )

Plaintiff, )

)

v. )

)

CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT, )

)

Defendant. )

)

____________________________________)

1:10-CV-106 AWI GSA

ORDER CLOSING CASE

On February 22, 2010, this Court sua sponte struck the complaint because the complaint

was incomprehensible. The Court gave Plaintiff twenty days in which to amend. The Court

stated that if Plaintiff did not amend, then the Court would close this case. See Court’s Docket

Doc. No. 4. Plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint. No defendant was served with the

complaint. Two mailings from the Court have been returned as undeliverable. There is no viable

complaint or viable claims left. This case cannot proceed. Under these circumstances, it is

appropriate to close this case. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk shall CLOSE this case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 16, 2010 /s/ Anthony W. Ishii 

0m8i78 CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:10-cv-00106-AWI-GSA Document 5 Filed 03/18/10 Page 1 of 1