Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-01625/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-01625-5/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Roberts
Defendant
Pierre Evans Simmons
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

PIERRE EVANS SIMMONS,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-05-1625 LKK KJM P

vs.

SERGEANT ROBERTS,

Defendant. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff has filed a document entitled “first response to interrogatories.” Plaintiff

is informed that court permission is not necessary for discovery requests and that neither

discovery requests served on an opposing party nor that party's responses should be filed until

such time as a party becomes dissatisfied with a response and seeks relief from the court based

on the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Local Rules and the court’s discovery orders. 

Discovery requests between the parties shall not be filed with the court unless, and until, they are

at issue. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s August 9, 2006 first

response to interrogatories will be placed in the court file and disregarded. Plaintiff is cautioned

that further filing of discovery requests or responses, except as required by rule of court, may 

/////

Case 2:05-cv-01625-KJM Document 30 Filed 09/22/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

result in an order of sanctions, including, but not limited to, a recommendation that this action be

dismissed. 

DATED: September 21, 2006.

______________________________________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

1/mp

simm1625.411(2)

Case 2:05-cv-01625-KJM Document 30 Filed 09/22/06 Page 2 of 2