Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-15-07307/USCOURTS-ca4-15-07307-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Samuel Lee Barrington
Appellant
United States of America
Appellee

Document Text:

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-7307

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

SAMUEL LEE BARRINGTON,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle 

District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Catherine C. Eagles, 

District Judge. (1:12-cr-00197-CCE-1; 1:13-cv-00510-CCE-JLW)

Submitted: December 18, 2015 Decided: December 22, 2015

Before AGEE and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit 

Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Samuel Lee Barrington, Appellant Pro Se. Harry L. Hobgood, 

Angela Hewlett Miller, Assistant United States Attorneys, 

Stephen Thomas Inman, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, 

Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 15-7307 Doc: 9 Filed: 12/22/2015 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Samuel Lee Barrington appeals the district court’s order 

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying 

relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. The district 

court granted a certificate of appealability on one issue: 

whether Barrington was entitled to resentencing following the 

Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. Johnson, 135 S. Ct. 

2551 (2015). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible 

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the 

district court. United States v. Barrington, Nos. 1:12-cr00197-CCE-1; 1:13-cv-00510-CCE-JLW (M.D.N.C. July 31, 2015). We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Appeal: 15-7307 Doc: 9 Filed: 12/22/2015 Pg: 2 of 2