Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_14-cv-01460/USCOURTS-caed-1_14-cv-01460-4/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Ann Andros
Defendant
California Spaghetti Restaurants, Inc.
Defendant
Ronald Moore
Plaintiff
The Old Spaghetti Factory
Defendant

Document Text:

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF ACTION; ORDER

Page 1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RONALD MOORE,

Plaintiff,

vs.

ANN ANDROS, et al.,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. 1:14-cv-01460-SKO

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF 

ACTION; ORDER TO CLOSE CASE

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff Ronald Moore and Defendants

Ann Andros and California Spaghetti Restaurants, Inc., dba The Old Spaghetti Factory, the 

parties to this action, by and through their respective counsel, that pursuant to Federal Rule of 

Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), the above-captioned action be dismissed with prejudice in its 

entirety. Each party is to bear its own attorneys’ fees and costs.

Date: September 1, 2015 MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C.

/s/ Tanya E. Moore

 Tanya E. Moore

Attorney for Plaintiff

Ronald Moore

Date: September 1, 2015 GRAY & THURN INC.

/s/ Robert F. Whitworth

Robert F. Whitworth

Attorneys for Defendants,

Ann Andros and California Spaghetti Restaurants, 

Inc., dba The Old Spaghetti Factory

Case 1:14-cv-01460-SKO Document 29 Filed 09/02/15 Page 1 of 2
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF ACTION; ORDER

Page 2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Pursuant to the parties' stipulation, this action has terminated pursuant to Federal Rule 

of Civil Procedure 41(a). Rule 41 allows the parties to dismiss an action voluntarily, after 

service of an answer, by filing a written stipulation to dismiss signed by all of the parties who 

have appeared, although an oral stipulation in open court will also suffice. See Eitel v. 

McCool, 782 F.2d 1470, 1472-73 (9th Cir. 1986). Case authority concerning stipulated 

dismissals under Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) is clear that the entry of such a stipulation of dismissal is 

effective automatically and does not require judicial approval. Commercial Space Mgmt. Co. 

v. Boeing Co., 193 F.3d 1074, 1077 (9th Cir. 1999).

All parties appearing in this action have filed a stipulation for dismissal. Accordingly, 

the Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to close this case pursuant to the parties' stipulation. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 1, 2015 /s/ Sheila K. Oberto 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:14-cv-01460-SKO Document 29 Filed 09/02/15 Page 2 of 2