Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca10-92-01326/USCOURTS-ca10-92-01326-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Walter Clinton Hall
Appellant
United States of America
Appellee

Document Text:

FILLLJ 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEJUJSted s,r~ ~~ppeal, 

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT DEC 18 1992 

ROBERT L. HOECKER 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Clerk 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v. 

WALTER CLINTON HALL, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

No. 92-1326 

(D.C. No. 92-CR-209) 

(D. Colo . ) 

ORDER AND JUDGMENT* 

Before SEYMOUR, TACHA, and EBEL, Circuit Judges. 

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel 

has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially 

assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App . P . 

34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. 

submitted without oral argument. 

The case is therefore ordered 

Appellant appeals the district court's order detaining him 

pending trial pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3142. Appellant contends 

the district court failed to give sufficient weight to various 

* This order and judgment has no precedential value and shall 

not be cited, or used by any court within the Tenth Circuit, 

except for purposes of establishing the doctrines of the law of 

the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. 10th Cir. R. 

36.3. 

Appellate Case: 92-1326 Document: 010110152679 Date Filed: 12/18/1992 Page: 1 
factors favoring release, and that it gave improper weight t o 

various factors favoring detention. 

Our rev iew of t h e district court's detention order is 

"plenary as to mixed questions of law and fact and independent, 

with due deference to the district court's purely factual 

findings." United States v. Stricklin, 932 F.2d 1353, 1355 (1 0th 

Cir. 1991). Based upon our review of the record on appeal, the 

parties' briefs, and the pertinent law, we conclude the district 

court properly ordered appellant detained pending trial. 

The judgment of the United States District Court for the 

District of Colorado is AFFIRMED. 

The mandate shall issue forthwith. 

ENTERED FOR THE COURT 

PER CURIAM 

2 

Appellate Case: 92-1326 Document: 010110152679 Date Filed: 12/18/1992 Page: 2