Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_14-cv-00610/USCOURTS-caed-1_14-cv-00610-2/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
William Roy Bonner
Plaintiff
A. Cruz
Defendant
M. Gaboa
Defendant
Connie Gipson
Defendant
M.P. Hernandez
Defendant
M. Holguin
Defendant
M. Jennings
Defendant
A. Nadai
Defendant
M.S. Robicheaux
Defendant
N. Scaife
Defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

WILLIAM ROY BONNER,

Plaintiff,

v.

GIPSON, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 1:14-cv-00610-LJO-JLT (PC)

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND 

RECOMMENDATIONS IN FULL THAT ACTION 

PROCEED ON PLAINTIFF'S EXCESSIVE 

FORCE CLAIMS AGAINST DEFENDANTS SGT. 

SCAIFE & C.O. HOLGUIN AND THAT ALL 

OTHER CLAIMS AND DEFENDANTS BE 

DISMISSED 

(Docs. 1, 8, 10)

Plaintiff, William Roy Bonner, is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis 

in this civil action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States 

Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ' 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On August 28, 2008, the Magistrate Judge filed a Findings and Recommendations herein 

which was served on Plaintiff and which contained notice that any objection to the Findings and 

Recommendations was to be filed within twenty days. No Objection was filed.1

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. ' 636(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a 

de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the 

Findings and Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

 

1 The Findings and Recommendations was triggered by Plaintiff=s decision not to file an amended complaint 

and to proceed only on the claims found to be cognizable by the Magistrate Judge in her order of June 11, 2014. 

(Docs. 8, 9.)

Case 1:14-cv-00610-LJO-JLT Document 11 Filed 08/20/14 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed July 9, 2014, is adopted in full;

2. This action shall proceed on Plaintiff=s Complaint, filed April 25, 2014, against

Defendants Sgt. N. Scaife and C/O M. Holguin on Plaintiff's Eighth Amendment 

excessive force claims;

3. Defendants Connie Gipson, M. Jennings, M. Gaboa, M.S. Robicheaux, A. Cruz, 

A. Nadai, and M.P. Hernandez and all other claims are dismissed for Plaintiff's 

failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted; 

4. the Clerk's Office shall terminate Defendants Connie Gipson, M. Jennings, M. 

Gaboa, M.S. Robicheaux, A. Cruz, A. Nadai, and M.P. Hernandez as parties 

pursuant to their dismissal from this action; and 

5. the action is referred back to the Magistrate Judge for service and further 

proceedings. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 20, 2014 /s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:14-cv-00610-LJO-JLT Document 11 Filed 08/20/14 Page 2 of 2