Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_09-cv-02668/USCOURTS-cand-3_09-cv-02668-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Commissioner of Social Security
Defendant
Daniel Rodriguez
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

Defendant failed to provide the Court with a chambers copy of his motion for an

extension of time. Although the Court has considered the motion, defendant, for future

reference, is reminded of the following provision in the Court’s Standing Orders: “In all

cases that have been assigned to the Electronic Case Filing Program, the parties are

required to provide for use in chambers one paper copy of each document that is filed

electronically. The paper copy of each such document shall be delivered no later than

noon on the day after the document is filed electronically. The paper copy shall be marked

‘Chambers Copy’ and shall be delivered to the Clerk’s Office in an envelope clearly marked

with the judge’s name, case number, and ‘E-Filing Chambers Copy.’”

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DANIEL RODRIGUEZ,

Plaintiff,

 v.

MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of

Social Security

Defendant

 /

No. C 09-2668 MMC

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S

MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO

FILE PROOF OF SERVICE

By order filed January 28, 2010, the Court directed defendant to serve plaintiff, no

later than February 5, 2010, with a copy of the administrative transcript, and to file, no later

than February 5, 2010, proof of such service.

Before the Court is defendant’s motion, filed February 17, 2010, for an extension of

time to file the above-referenced proof of service, specifically, an extension to February 23,

2010.1

 Thereafter, on February 23, 2010, defendant filed proof of service, which filing

Case 3:09-cv-02668-MMC Document 25 Filed 02/25/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

indicates defendant served plaintiff with the administrative transcript on December 17, 2009.

Good cause appearing, defendant’s motion for an extension to file the proof of

service is hereby GRANTED.

The deadline for plaintiff to file his motion for summary judgment remains March 12,

2010, as set forth in the Court’s January 28, 2010 order. In such motion, plaintiff shall set

forth all arguments in support of his position that the administrative law judge’s decision of

February 23, 2007 is erroneous. The Court hereby informs plaintiff that a failure to file a

motion for summary judgment may result in dismissal of the above-titled action for failure to

prosecute.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 25, 2010 

MAXINE M. CHESNEY

United States District Judge

Case 3:09-cv-02668-MMC Document 25 Filed 02/25/10 Page 2 of 2