Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca10-04-01348/USCOURTS-ca10-04-01348-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Terrelle Vinson Martin
Appellant
United States of America
Appellee

Document Text:

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

TENTH CIRCUIT 

FILED 

United States Court of Appeals 

Tenth Circuit 

May 23, 2005 

PATRICK FISHER 

Clerk 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff - Appellee, 

V. 

TERRELLE VINSON MARTIN, 

Defendant - Appellant. 

No. 04-1348 

(D. Colorado) 

(D.C. No. 03-CR-252-D) 

ORDER AND JUDGMENT* 

Before SEYMOUR, HARTZ, and McCONNELL, Circuit Judges. 

Defendant Terrelle Vinson Martin was convicted after a jury trial of 

unlawful possession of a firearm by a convicted felon. See 18 U.S.C. § 922(g). 

Because Defendant has multiple prior felony convictions, he was designated an 

armed career criminal. See 18 U.S.C. § 924( e). His resulting total offense level, 

33, and criminal history category, VI, yielded a guidelines range of 235-293 

* After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined 

unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of 

this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1 (G). The case is 

therefore ordered submitted without oral argument. This order and judgment is 

not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, 

and collateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and 

judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and 

conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3. 

Appellate Case: 04-1348 Document: 010110642429 Date Filed: 05/23/2005 Page: 1
months' imprisonment. The district court sentenced Defendant to the 23 5-month 

minimum sentence. 

Before the sentencing hearing Defendant filed a motion arguing that in 

light of Blakely v. Washington, 124 S. Ct. 2531 (2004), the Sentencing Guidelines 

were unconstitutional. The district court denied the motion and Defendant 

appeals. 

While this matter was on appeal the United States Supreme Court handed 

down United States v. Booker, 125 S. Ct. 738 (2005). The government concedes 

that United States v. Labastida-Segura, 396 F.3d 1140 (10th Cir. 2005), requires 

Defendant's case to be remanded for resentencing. 

We agree and REMAND to the district court for resentencing. 

ENTERED FOR THE COURT 

Harris L Hartz 

Circuit Judge 

-2-

Appellate Case: 04-1348 Document: 010110642429 Date Filed: 05/23/2005 Page: 2