Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-01649/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-01649-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Dywrone Brown
Plaintiff
Igbinosa
Defendant
J. Yates
Defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

U.S. District Court

 E. D. California 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

)

DYWRONE BROWN, )

)

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. )

)

J. YATES, et. al., )

) 

Defendant. )

____________________________________)

CV F- 06-1649 AWI DLB P 

ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO

SUBMIT USM 285 FORMS

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with a civil rights

complaint which was removed from the Fresno County Superior Court. The complaint appears to a

cognizable claims for relief for deliberate indifference to serious medical needs in violation of the

Eighth Amendment and supplemental state laws claims against defendants Yates and Igbinosa. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Service is appropriate for defendants Yates and Igbinosa.

2. The Clerk of the Court shall send Plaintiff two (2) USM-285 forms, two (2)

summons, a Notice of Submission of Documents form, an instruction sheet and a

copy of the complaint filed November 15, 2006.

3. Within THIRTY (30) DAYS from the date of this Order, Plaintiff shall complete the

Case 1:06-cv-01649-AWI-DLB Document 5 Filed 10/01/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

U.S. District Court

 E. D. California 2

attached Notice of Submission of Documents and submit the completed Notice to the

Court with the following documents:

a. Completed summons;

b. One completed USM-285 form for each defendant listed above; and 

c. Three (3) copies of the endorsed complaint filed November 15, 2006.

4. Plaintiff need not attempt service on Defendants and need not request waiver of

service. Upon receipt of the above-described documents, the court will direct the

United States Marshal to serve the above-named Defendants pursuant to Federal Rule

of Civil Procedure 4 without payment of costs. 

5. The failure to comply with this Order will result in a Recommendation that this action

be dismissed.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: October 1, 2007 /s/ Dennis L. Beck 

3c0hj8 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-01649-AWI-DLB Document 5 Filed 10/01/07 Page 2 of 2