Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca8-15-02275/USCOURTS-ca8-15-02275-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Kraft Global Foods
Appellee
Sherry McDaniel
Appellant

Document Text:

United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 15-2275

___________________________

Sherry McDaniel

lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant

v.

Kraft Global Foods

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee

____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the Western District of Missouri - Springfield

____________

 Submitted: January 13, 2016

Filed: February 1, 2016

[Unpublished]

____________

Before WOLLMAN, ARNOLD, SMITH, Circuit Judges. 

____________

PER CURIAM.

Sherry McDaniel appeals after the district court dismissed her Title VII 1

complaint as barred by the statute of limitations. Upon de novo review, we conclude

The Honorable M. Douglas Harpool, United States District Judge for the

1

Western District of Missouri.

Appellate Case: 15-2275 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/01/2016 Entry ID: 4361850 
that the dismissal was proper, as McDaniel’s own filingsshowed thatshe brought her

lawsuit more than ninety days after receiving a right-to-sue notice from the Equal

Employment Opportunity Commission, and tolling of the limitations period was not

warranted. See 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-5(f)(1) (setting forth 90-day limitations period);

Richter v. Advance Auto Parts, Inc., 686 F.3d 847, 851 (8th Cir. 2012) (explaining

application ofstatute of limitation); Garfield v. J.C. Nichols Real Estate, 57 F.3d 662,

666 (8th Cir. 1995) (discussing equitable tolling); see also Schaaf v. Residential

Funding Corp., 517 F.3d 544, 549 (8th Cir. 2008) (de novo standard of review).

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________

-2-

Appellate Case: 15-2275 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/01/2016 Entry ID: 4361850