Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_24-cv-02782/USCOURTS-caed-2_24-cv-02782-2/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Riva on the River Homeowners Association
Plaintiff
The Management Association, Inc.
Defendant
The Management Trust
Defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RIVA ON THE RIVER HOMEOWNERS 

ASSOCIATION,

Plaintiff,

v.

THE MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION, 

INC., DBA THE MANAGEMENT 

TRUST, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 2:24-cv-02782-CSK

ORDER FOR JOINT SCHEDULING 

REPORT

This action has been assigned to United States Magistrate Judge Chi Soo Kim 

upon the consent of all parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). (ECF No. 11.) Defendant 

The Management Association, Inc., dba The Management Trust, has answered Plaintiff 

Riva on the River Homeowners Association’s Complaint. (ECF No. 8) There are no other 

defendants named in the Complaint.

1 (See ECF No. 1.) Thus, this case is ripe for 

scheduling.

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16 and Local Rule 240, IT IS 

HEREBY ORDERED:

1. Within 30 days of this order, the parties shall confer regarding the filing of a Joint 

1 Plaintiff also names Defendants Does 1-100 in the Complaint. See ECF No. 1 at 2, 3.

Case 2:24-cv-02782-CSK Document 15 Filed 12/06/24 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Status Report addressing the relevant portions of Local Rule 240(a) to facilitate 

the entry of a pretrial scheduling order. In addition to the requirements of Local 

Rule 240(a), the parties shall also address the following in their Joint Status 

Report:

a) The parties’ estimated length of trial, and whether the case will be tried to a

jury or to the bench;

b) Whether Defendants Does 1-100 will be dismissed by Plaintiff, and if not, 

when Plaintiff will identify and amend to name additional defendants 

currently identified as Doe Defendants; 

c) In the proposed schedule presented pursuant to Local Rule 240(a)(11), 

include proposed dates for the filing of a Joint Mid-Discovery Statement, 

which should occur at a mid-point during the fact discovery time period; 

and the final pretrial conference, which should occur three to four weeks 

before the proposed trial date. The parties’ proposed trial date should 

occur approximately four to five months after the dispositive motion hearing 

deadline; and

d) In the proposed schedule for expert disclosures presented pursuant to 

Local Rule 240(a)(11), include proposed dates for initial expert disclosures 

and rebuttal expert disclosures.

2. An initial pretrial scheduling conference shall be held on Tuesday, January 28, 

2025 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom 25.

3. The parties are reminded of the Local Rule 240(b) requirement to submit a 

proposed discovery plan within fourteen (14) days of the parties’ discovery 

conference.

4. The parties are directed to Judge Kim’s Civil Standing Orders, which are located 

on the Court’s website at www.caed.uscourts.gov (select “Judges,” then select 

Magistrate Judge Chi Soo Kim). The parties should take note of the page limits for 

civil motions and discovery joint statements. The parties are responsible for 

Case 2:24-cv-02782-CSK Document 15 Filed 12/06/24 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3

knowing and complying with the Court’s standing orders. 

5. The parties are further reminded of their continuing duty to notify the Court

immediately of any settlement or other disposition. See Local Rule 160.

Dated: December 6, 2024

4, riva2782.24

Case 2:24-cv-02782-CSK Document 15 Filed 12/06/24 Page 3 of 3