Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-01096/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-01096-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
John Ferrini
Plaintiff
Theresa Ferrini
Plaintiff
Unigard Indemnity Company
Defendant
Unigard Insurance Company
Defendant

Document Text:

-1- CASE NO. 07CV1096 – LEW – GGH 

ORDER ON CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

The Motion for Summary Judgment of defendants Unigard Indemnity Company and 

Unigard Insurance Company (“Unigard”), and the Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment of 

plaintiffs John Ferrini and Theresa Ferrini came on for hearing before this Court on November 2, 

2007. Having considered the papers filed in connection with the motion and cross-motion, and 

argument of counsel, and good cause appearing therefor, the Court finds and rules as follows: 

1. On the Plaintiffs’ First Cause of Action, the defendants are entitled to a judgment 

declaring that the underinsured motorist coverage provided by Unigard Indemnity Company to 

plaintiff John Ferrini’s employer requires a reduction of the per-accident policy limit by the 

amount of all workers’ compensation benefits paid to John Ferrini because of the December 11, 

2000 accident, to the extent such payments exceed the recovery from the at-fault underinsured 

driver. 

JOHN FERRINI and THERESA 

FERRINI, 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

UNIGARD INDEMNITY COMPANY, 

UNIGARD INSURANCE COMPANY 

and Does 1 through 25, inclusive, 

Defendants. 

 CASE NO. 07CV1096 – LEW – GGH 

ORDER ON CROSS-MOTIONS FOR 

SUMMARY JUDGMENT 

Case 2:07-cv-01096-LEW-GGH Document 41 Filed 11/27/07 Page 1 of 2
 -2- CASE NO. 07CV1096 – LEW – GGH 

ORDER ON CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 Accordingly, the Court GRANTS Unigard’s Motion for Summary Judgment as to 

Plaintiffs’ First Cause of Action, and DENIES Ferrinis’ Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment. 

2. Pursuant to stipulation, the Plaintiffs’ Second and Third Causes of Action have 

been dismissed. Accordingly, the Court DENIES AS MOOT Unigard’s Motion for Summary 

Judgment as to Plaintiffs’ Second and Third Causes of Action. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: November 26, 2007 

HONORABLE RONALD S.W. LEW 

Senior United States District Judge 

Case 2:07-cv-01096-LEW-GGH Document 41 Filed 11/27/07 Page 2 of 2