Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-07-01599/USCOURTS-ca4-07-01599-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Roberto Ifill
Appellant
John E. Potter
Appellee

Document Text:

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-1599

ROBERTO IFILL,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

JOHN E. POTTER, Postmaster General, United States Postal

Service,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District

Judge. (1:06-cv-01393-LMB)

Submitted: April 28, 2008 Decided: May 12, 2008

Before MICHAEL, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Francis H. Koh, KOH LAW FIRMS, LLC, North Bethesda, Maryland, for

Appellant. Chuck Rosenberg, United States Attorney, Kevin J.

Mikolashek, Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia,

for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 07-1599 Doc: 23 Filed: 05/12/2008 Pg: 1 of 2
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Roberto Ifill appeals the district court’s order granting

the Postmaster General’s summary judgment motion on Ifill’s hostile

work environment and retaliation claims, brought pursuant to Title

VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e

to 2000e-17 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by

the district court. Ifill v. Potter, No. 1:06-cv-01393 (E.D. Va.

Apr. 23, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Appeal: 07-1599 Doc: 23 Filed: 05/12/2008 Pg: 2 of 2