Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_05-cr-00547/USCOURTS-cand-4_05-cr-00547-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
USA
Plaintiff
Duke Deshawn Woods
Defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER

CR 05-00574 PJH

KEVIN V. RYAN (CSBN 118321)

United States Attorney

EUMI L. CHOI (WVBN 0722)

Chief, Criminal Division

SUSAN R. JERICH (CSBN 188462) 

Assistant United States Attorney

450 Golden Gate Avenue, Box 36055

San Francisco, California 94102

Telephone: (415) 436-7158

Facsimile: (415) 436-7234

Email: susan.jerich@usdoj.gov

Attorneys for Plaintiff

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) No.: CR 05-00547 PJH

)

Plaintiff, ) PARTIES’ STIPULATION AND 

) PROPOSED ORDER EXCLUDING TIME

)

DUKE DESHAWN WOODS, )

)

 Defendant. )

)

 )

) 

____________________________________) 

The parties stipulate and agree, and the Court finds and holds, as follows:

1. The parties initially appeared in United States District Court on the instant matter on

September 7, 2005. The matter was continued until October 5, 2005, for status. 

2. The government indicated that discovery was not completed and was ongoing. There was

a request that time be excluded based upon effective preparation of counsel. 

3. In light of the foregoing facts, the failure to grant the requested exclusion would

unreasonably deny counsel for the defense the reasonable time necessary for effective

preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. See 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(A),

(B)(iv). The ends of justice would be served by the Court excluding the proposed time period. 

Case 4:05-cr-00547-PJH Document 9 Filed 10/05/05 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER

CR 05-00547 PJH 2

These ends outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. See id. §

3161(h)(8)(A). 

4. For the reasons stated, the time period from September 7, 2005 through October 5, 2005,

shall be excluded from the calculation of time under the Speedy Trial Act. 

SO STIPULATED.

DATED: 9/13/05 Respectfully Submitted, 

__________/s/____________________

SUSAN R. JERICH

Assistant United States Attorney

DATED: 9/20/05

__________/s/_____________________

RONALD TYLER

Counsel for Defendant Duke Deshawn Woods

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: __________________________________

HON. PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON

United States District Judge

10/5/05

Case 4:05-cr-00547-PJH Document 9 Filed 10/05/05 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER

CR 05-00547 PJH 3

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned hereby certifies that a copy of the Parties’ Stipulation and Proposed

Order in the case of United States v. Duke Deshawn Woods, No. CR 05-00547 PJH, was served

today as follows:

Via Hand Delivery

Ronald Tyler

Federal Public Defender’s Office 

450 Golden Gate Avenue

San Francisco, CA 94102

I certify under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.

Executed on 9/13/05 at San Francisco, California.

 /s/ 

Rawaty Yim

United States Attorney’s Office

Case 4:05-cr-00547-PJH Document 9 Filed 10/05/05 Page 3 of 3