Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca5-14-41406/USCOURTS-ca5-14-41406-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Rubicel Cardenas-Mendoza
Appellant
United States of America
Appellee

Document Text:

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-41406

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

RUBICEL CARDENAS-MENDOZA, also known as Caesar CardenasMendoza,

Defendant-Appellant

Cons. w/No. 14-41407

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

CESAR CARDENAS-MENDOZA,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeals from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 2:14-CR-504-5

USDC No. 2:12-CR-366-1

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

December 21, 2016

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 14-41406 Document: 00513808267 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/21/2016
No. 14-41406

c/w No. 14-41407

2

Before DAVIS, SOUTHWICK, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Rubicel Cardenas-Mendoza has 

moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. 

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th 

Cir. 2011). Cardenas-Mendoza has not filed a response. We have reviewed 

counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We 

concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous 

issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw 

is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the 

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

 Case: 14-41406 Document: 00513808267 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/21/2016