Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_09-cv-05274/USCOURTS-cand-4_09-cv-05274-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Henkel Corporation
Defendant
James Sappington
Plaintiff

Document Text:

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JAMES SAPPINGTON,

Plaintiff, No. C 09-5274 PJH

v. ORDER GRANTING REMAND

AND VACATING HEARING

HENKEL CORPORATION, DATE

Defendant.

_______________________________/

The court is in receipt of defendant’s non-opposition to plaintiff’s pending motion to

remand, in which defendant expressly consents to remand. In view of defendant’s nonopposition and consent, and for good cause shown, the court hereby GRANTS plaintiff’s

motion to remand the action and remands the matter to state court. The January 20, 2010

hearing date currently set for hearing on plaintiff’s motion is accordingly VACATED. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 8, 2010 ______________________________

PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON

United States District Judge

Case 4:09-cv-05274-PJH Document 11 Filed 01/08/10 Page 1 of 1