Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-arwd-5_04-cv-05255/USCOURTS-arwd-5_04-cv-05255-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Enviro-Kleen Enterprises, L.P.
Plaintiff
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Defendant

Document Text:

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS

FAYETTEVILLE DIVISION

ENVIRO-KLEEN ENTERPRISES, L.P. PLAINTIFF

vs. CASE No. 04-5255 

WAL-MART STORES, INC. DEFENDANT

O R D E R

Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion to

Nonsuit Without Prejudice. (Doc. 23.) Defendant has filed a

response in opposition to Plaintiff’s motion. (Doc. 24.)

Defendant requests the Court deny the motion; however, if the

Court dismisses Plaintiff’s complaint, Defendant requests the

Court to condition the dismissal of Plaintiff’s case upon

payment by Plaintiff of Defendant’s costs and attorneys fees

in this action on re-filing. Id. The trial in this case is

currently scheduled for November 28, 2005. Plaintiff filed

the current motion to dismiss on November 14, 2005.

Upon due consideration, Plaintiff’s motion (Doc. 23) is

GRANTED and Plaintiff’s complaint is hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT

PREJUDICE pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure

41(a)(2). Should Plaintiff re-file the complaint, the Court

will consider requiring Plaintiff to compensate Defendant for

any duplicative costs and expenses incurred, to include

attorneys fees. The parties shall bear their own costs and

attorneys fees. 

Case 5:04-cv-05255-RTD Document 25 Filed 11/18/05 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: <pageID>
2

IT IS SO ORDERED this 18 day of November 2005. th

 /S/ Robert T. Dawson 

 Robert T. Dawson

 United States District Judge

Case 5:04-cv-05255-RTD Document 25 Filed 11/18/05 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: <pageID>