Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-02653/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-02653-3/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Karen Alexandrou
Plaintiff
County of Sacramento
Defendant
Richard Maddox
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 The caption is modified to reflect the dismissal of Community 1

Prosecution Unit on July 24, 2006.

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RICHARD MADDOX, a natural person; ) 

KAREN ALEXANDROU, a natural )

person; TIEN HONG VO, a natural )

person; THONG VO, a natural person;)

NGAU THI NGUYEN, a natural person; )

and SONIA LUONG, a natural person, )

) 2:06-cv-0072-GEB-EFB

Plaintiffs, )

)

v. ) STATUS (PRETRIAL

) SCHEDULING) ORDER 

COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, a local )

government agency; JAN SCULLY, a )

natural person and the District )

Attorney for Sacramento County; )

CYNTHIA BESEMER, a natural person )

and Chief Deputy District Attorney )

for Sacramento County; KAREN )

MAXWELL, a natural person and )

Deputy District Attorney for )

Sacramento County; NATALIA LUNA, )

a natural person and Deputy )

District Attorney for Sacramento )

County; WILLIAM MOTMANS, a natural )

person and an investigator )

employed by the District Attorney )

for Sacramento County; and JAMES )

COOPER, a natural person and a )

captain of the Sacramento County )

Sheriff’s Department, )

)

Defendants. )

1

)

Case 2:06-cv-02653-GEB-EFB Document 27 Filed 09/20/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

The parties are reminded that “[t]he failure of one or more of 2

the parties to participate in the preparation of the Joint Status Report

does not excuse the other parties from their obligation to timely file

a status report in accordance with this Order. In the event a party

fails to participate as ordered, the party timely submitting the status

report shall include a declaration explaining why it was unable to

obtain the cooperation of the other party or parties.” (Order Setting

Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference at 2 n.1.)

2

The Joint Status Report submitted by the parties on

September 8, 2006, reveals this action is not ready for scheduling. 

Therefore, the status (pretrial scheduling) conference scheduled for

September 25, 2006, is rescheduled to commence at 9:00 a.m. on

December 18, 2006. In accordance with the Order Setting Status

(Pretrial Scheduling) Conference filed January 12, 2006, the parties

shall file a further joint status report no later than December 4,

2006.2

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 20, 2006

/s/ Garland E. Burrell, Jr.

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.

United States District Judge

Case 2:06-cv-02653-GEB-EFB Document 27 Filed 09/20/06 Page 2 of 2