Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-15-02250/USCOURTS-ca4-15-02250-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
American Civil Liberties Union
Appellee
Tyrone Hurt
Appellant

Document Text:

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-2230

TYRONE HURT,

 Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS,

 Defendant - Appellee.

No. 15-2231

TYRONE HURT,

 Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

ALL PAST TO PRESENT MAYORS, across this nation; ALL MOTHERS 

AND FATHERS OF THE PAST TO THE PRESENT, across this nation; 

ALL SURVIVORS OF THE PAST TO THE PRESENT, across this 

nation; UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Defendants - Appellees.

No. 15-2233

TYRONE HURT,

 Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

Appeal: 15-2250 Doc: 12 Filed: 05/02/2016 Pg: 1 of 8
2

DYLANN ROOF,

 Defendant - Appellee.

No. 15-2234

TYRONE HURT,

 Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

DYLANN ROOF; ERIC HOLT; HOLT AND WHITE, Council & Concerned 

Citizen; G. O. P. REPUBLICANS; UNITED STATES HOUSE OF 

REPRESENTATIVES; THE COUNTRY OF GERMANY; THE AMERICAN 

COLLEGE DICTIONARY,

 Defendants - Appellees.

No. 15-2235

TYRONE HURT,

 Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT (1946), Hague, Germany; 

INTERNATIONAL PEACE COURT (1946), Hague, Germany; KKK, 

across this nation,

 Defendants - Appellees.

No. 15-2236

TYRONE HURT,

 Plaintiff – Appellant,

Appeal: 15-2250 Doc: 12 Filed: 05/02/2016 Pg: 2 of 8
3

v.

THE SOUTH CAROLINA HATE, within this nation; INCLUDING THE 

CHIEF OF POLICE, and all law enforcement officials,

 Defendants - Appellees.

No. 15-2237

TYRONE HURT,

 Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT (1946); INTERNATIONAL PEACE 

COURT, Hague, Germany (1946); NARCOTIC AGENTS (1972),

 Defendants - Appellees.

No. 15-2238

TYRONE HURT,

 Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

CHIEF OF POLICE, and all law enforcement officers,

 Defendant - Appellee.

No. 15-2241

TYRONE HURT,

 Plaintiff – Appellant,

Appeal: 15-2250 Doc: 12 Filed: 05/02/2016 Pg: 3 of 8
4

v.

7TH DISTRICT, D. C. METROPOLITAN; POLICE DEPARTMENTS; D. C. 

COUNCIL,

 Defendants - Appellees.

No. 15-2242

TYRONE HURT,

 Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT - 1946 - (HAGUE, GERMANY); 

THE INTERNATIONAL PEACE COURT - 1946 - (HAGUE, GERMANY),

 Defendants - Appellees.

No. 15-2243

TYRONE HURT,

 Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Defendant - Appellee.

No. 15-2244

TYRONE HURT,

 Plaintiff – Appellant,

Appeal: 15-2250 Doc: 12 Filed: 05/02/2016 Pg: 4 of 8
5

v.

THE STATE OF VIRGINIA; NARCOTIC AGENTS (1972),

 Defendants - Appellees.

No. 15-2246

TYRONE HURT,

 Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

THE CENTER OF THE WORLD; UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Defendants - Appellees.

No. 15-2249

TYRONE HURT,

 Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Defendant - Appellee.

No. 15-2250

TYRONE HURT,

 Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

Appeal: 15-2250 Doc: 12 Filed: 05/02/2016 Pg: 5 of 8
6

THE AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION,

 Defendant - Appellee.

No. 15-2251

TYRONE HURT,

 Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

U. S. CONSTITUTION; DR. REV. MARTIN LUTHER KING, JR.; 

INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT, (1946 Hague, Germany); 

INTERNATIONAL PEACE COURT, (1946 Hague, Germany); AMERICAN 

PEOPLE, in American cities; UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Defendants - Appellees.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever III, 

Chief District Judge. (5:15-cv-00310-D; 5:15-cv-00322-D; 5:15-

cv-00335-D; 5:15-cv-00336-D; 5:15-cv-00337-D; 5:15-cv-00341-D; 

5:15-cv-00342-D; 5:15-cv-00356-D; 5:15-cv-00409-D; 5:15-cv00412-D; 5:15-cv-00413-D; 5:15-cv-00416-D; 5:15-cv-00440-D; 

5:15-cv-00469-D; 5:15-cv-00470-D; 5:15-cv-00487-D)

Submitted: March 18, 2016 Decided: May 2, 2016

Before KEENAN, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Tyrone Hurt, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 15-2250 Doc: 12 Filed: 05/02/2016 Pg: 6 of 8
7

PER CURIAM:

Tyrone Hurt appeals the district court’s order dismissing 

his civil actions under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012) and 

directing Hurt to show cause why a prefiling injunction should 

not issue. We dismiss the appeal. 

With respect to the dismissal of these actions as 

frivolous, we have reviewed the records and find no reversible 

error. Accordingly, we dismiss this portion of the appeal for 

the reasons stated by the district court. Hurt v. City of St. 

Louis, No. 5:15-cv-00310-D; Hurt v. All Past to Present Mayors, 

No. 5:15-cv-00322-D; Hurt v. Roof, Nos. 5:15-cv-00335-D, 5:15-

cv-00336-D; Hurt v. Int’l Criminal Court, No. 5:15-cv-00337-D; 

Hurt v. The South Carolina Hate, No. 5:15-cv-00341-D; Hurt v. 

Int’l Criminal Court, No. 5:15-cv-00342-D; Hurt v. Chief of 

Police, No. 5:15-cv-00356-D; Hurt v. 7th District, No. 5:15-cv00409-D; Hurt v. Int’l Criminal Court, No. 5:15-cv-00412-D; Hurt 

v. United States, No. 5:15-cv-00413-D; Hurt v. Virginia, Nos. 

5:15-cv-00416-D; Hurt v. The Center of the World, No. 5:15-cv00440-D; Hurt v. United States, No. 5:15-cv-00469-D; Hurt v. 

ACLU, No. 5:15-cv-00470-D; Hurt v. U.S. Constitution, No. 5:15-

cv-00487-D (E.D.N.C. Sept. 23, 2015). 

The district court also directed Hurt to show cause why a 

prefiling injunction should not issue. Rather than respond to 

the court’s order, Hurt filed his notice of appeal. This court 

Appeal: 15-2250 Doc: 12 Filed: 05/02/2016 Pg: 7 of 8
8

may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. 

§ 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders,

28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. 

Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The 

show cause order Hurt seeks to appeal is neither a final order 

nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. 

Accordingly, we dismiss this portion of the appeal for lack of 

jurisdiction. 

We deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the motion 

to amend or correct. We dispense with oral argument because the 

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

DISMISSED

Appeal: 15-2250 Doc: 12 Filed: 05/02/2016 Pg: 8 of 8