Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-01396/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-01396-2/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
County of Sacramento
Defendant
Sheila L. Davidson
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SHEILA L. DAVIDSON,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-05-1396 DFL KJM P

vs.

COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, et al.,

Defendant. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

Recent court orders were served on plaintiff's address of record and returned by

the postal service. It appears that plaintiff has failed to comply with Local Rule 83-182(f), which

requires that a party appearing in propria persona inform the court of any address change.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed for

plaintiff's failure to keep the court apprised of his current address. See Local Rules 83-182(f) and

11-110.

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty

days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written

objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s

Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the

Case 2:05-cv-01396-DFL -KJM Document 9 Filed 04/25/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951

F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: April 24, 2006.

______________________________________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

/mp

davi1396.33a

Case 2:05-cv-01396-DFL -KJM Document 9 Filed 04/25/06 Page 2 of 2