Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cr-00725/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cr-00725-11/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Trevor Graham
Defendant
USA
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]

ORDER EXCLUDING TIME

CR 06-0725 SI

KEVIN V. RYAN (CASBN 118321)

United States Attorney

MARK L. KROTOSKI (CASBN 138549)

Chief, Criminal Division

MATTHEW A. PARRELLA (NYSBN 2040855)

JEFFREY D. NEDROW (CASBN 161299)

JEFFREY R. FINIGAN (CASBN 168285)

Assistant United States Attorneys

450 Golden Gate Avenue

San Francisco, California 94102

Telephone: (415) 436-7232

Facsimile: (415) 436-7234

Email: jeffrey.finigan@usdoj.gov

Attorneys for Plaintiff

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

TREVOR GRAHAM,

Defendant.

 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Criminal No. CR 06-0725 SI

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]

ORDER EXCLUDING TIME

The above-captioned matter came before the Court on February 16, 2007, for status. The

defendant was represented by Gail Shifman, Esq., and Joseph Zeszotarski, Esq., and the

government was represented by Jeffrey Finigan, Assistant United States Attorney. The mater

was continued to March 30, 2007, at 11:00 a.m. in this Court for further proceedings. 

The Court made a finding that the time from and including February 16, 2007, through

March 30, 2007, should be excluded under the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(A),

Case 3:06-cr-00725-SI Document 33 Filed 02/20/2007 Page 1 of 2
 Case 3:06-cr-00725-SI Document 35 Filed 02/21/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]

ORDER EXCLUDING TIME

CR 06-0725 SI 2

because the ends of justice served by taking such action outweighed the best interest of the public

and the defendant in a speedy trial. The finding was based on the need for the defendant to have

reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due

diligence, and for continuity of counsel pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(B)(iv). 

The parties hereby agree to and request that the case be continued until March 30, 2007,

and that the exclusion of time until then be granted. The parties agree and stipulate that the

additional time is appropriate and necessary under Title 18, United States Code, § 3161(h)(8)(A),

because the ends of justice served by this continuance outweigh the best interest of the public and

the defendant in a speedy trial. This time exclusion will allow defense counsel to effectively

prepare, taking into account the exercise of due diligence, and will provide for continuity of

counsel for the defendant.

DATED: February 19, 2007 /s/ 

GAIL SHIFMAN

Counsel for Trevor Graham

DATED: February 16, 2007 /s/ 

JEFFREY FINIGAN

Assistant U.S. Attorney

So ordered.

DATED: 

SUSAN ILLSTON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

Case 3:06-cr-00725-SI Document 33 Filed 02/20/2007 Page 2 of 2
 Case 3:06-cr-00725-SI Document 35 Filed 02/21/07 Page 2 of 2