Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_13-cv-02506/USCOURTS-caed-2_13-cv-02506-7/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Horowitz
Defendant
Richard Peacock
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

RICHARD PEACOCK, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

HOROWITZ, 

Defendants. 

No. 2:13-cv-2506 TLN AC P 

ORDER 

 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 

U.S.C. § 1983. Currently before the court is defendant’s motion to compel and to modify the 

scheduling order (ECF No. 31) which defendant now partially withdraws (ECF No. 35). 

 Defendant sought (1) to compel plaintiff to complete his deposition, (2) to modify the 

scheduling order to allow for the completion of plaintiff’s deposition after the close of discovery, 

and (3) to extend the time for filing dispositive motions. ECF No. 31. The motion to modify the 

scheduling order was previously granted and the dispositive motion deadline was vacated with 

new deadlines to complete plaintiff’s deposition and file dispositive motions to be set upon 

resolution of the motion to compel. ECF No. 33. Defendant now withdraws her motion to 

compel and for sanctions because plaintiff agreed to and did complete his deposition. ECF No. 

35. Defendant requests sixty days to file a dispositive motion. Id. 

///// 

Case 2:13-cv-02506-TLN-AC Document 36 Filed 09/29/15 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2

 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that discovery is closed and the dispositive 

motion deadline is re-set. The parties shall have sixty days from the filing of this order to file

dispositive motions. 

DATED: September 29, 2015 

Case 2:13-cv-02506-TLN-AC Document 36 Filed 09/29/15 Page 2 of 2