Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-01652/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-01652-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Board of Behavioral Sciences
Defendant
Robert Gerst
Defendant
Catherine Kay
Defendant
Victor Law
Defendant
Peter Manoleas
Defendant
Sherry Mehl
Defendant
Tom Merrell
Plaintiff
Glynis Morrow
Defendant
Karen Pines
Defendant
Paul Riches
Defendant
Howard Stein
Defendant
Susan Ulevitch
Defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

----oo0oo----

TOM MERRELL,

NO. CIV. S-05-01652 FCD DAD

Plaintiff,

v. ORDER

BOARD OF BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES,

SHERRY MEHL, PAUL RICHES,

CATHERINE KAY, ROBERT GERST,

VICTOR LAW, PETER MANOLEAS,

GLYNIS MORROW, KAREN PINES,

HOWARD STEIN, SUSAN ULEVITCH,

and DOES 1 to 30.

Defendants.

----oo0oo----

This matter comes before the court on defendants’ motion to

dismiss plaintiff’s complaint (“complaint”) pursuant to Rule

12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 

In response, plaintiff filed a non-opposition to defendants’

motion to dismiss and a request to withdraw suit.

Case 2:05-cv-01652-FCD-DAD Document 10 Filed 10/18/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

The court grants plaintiff’s request to withdraw suit

pursuant to Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 

Thus, the court does not address the merits of defendants’ motion

to dismiss. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: October 17, 2005 

/s/ Frank C. Damrell Jr. 

FRANK C. DAMRELL, Jr.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:05-cv-01652-FCD-DAD Document 10 Filed 10/18/05 Page 2 of 2