Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_13-cr-00628/USCOURTS-azd-2_13-cr-00628-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Julie Ann Angulo
Defendant
USA
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

United States of America, 

Plaintiff, 

vs.

Julie Ann Angulo, 

Defendant. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CR-13-628-PHX-GMS (BSB)

ORDER OF DETENTION

In accordance with Title 18 U.S.C. § 3142 of the Bail Reform Act, a detention hearing

was held in the above-captioned matter. The Court finds that the Government has

established: (Check one or both, as applicable)

9 by clear and convincing evidence, Defendant is a danger to the community and shall be

detained pending trial.

9 by a preponderance of the evidence, Defendant is a serious flight risk and shall be

detained pending trial.

PART I -- FINDINGS OF FACT

: (1) There is probable cause to believe that Defendant has committed the following:

: an offense for which a maximum term of imprisonment of ten years or more is

prescribed in 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), 952, 960, and 963.

Case 2:13-cr-00628-GMS Document 16 Filed 05/21/13 Page 1 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

9 an offense under 18 U.S.C. §§ 924(c), 956(a), or 2332(b).

9 an offense listed in 18 U.S.C. § 2332b(g)(5)(B) (crimes of terrorism) for which

a maximum term of imprisonment of ten years or more is prescribed.

9 an offense involving a minor victim prescribed in .

: (2) Defendant has not rebutted the presumption established by finding that no condition

or combination of conditions will reasonably assure Defendant’s appearance as required at

future court proceedings.

Alternative Findings

9 (1) There is a serious risk that Defendant will flee and no condition or combination of

conditions will reasonably assure Defendant’s appearance as required at future court

proceedings.

9 (2) No condition or combination of conditions will reasonably assure the safety of the

community or others if Defendant were released from detention.

9 (3) There is a serious risk that the defendant will (obstruct or attempt to obstruct justice)

(threaten, injure, or intimidate a prospective witness or juror).

9 (4) 

 

PART II -- WRITTEN STATEMENT OF REASONS FOR DETENTION

(Check one or both, as applicable)

9 (1) The Court finds that credible testimony and information submitted at the hearing

establish by clear and convincing evidence as to danger that:

 

Case 2:13-cr-00628-GMS Document 16 Filed 05/21/13 Page 2 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 3 -

: (2) The Court finds by a preponderance of the evidence as to risk of flight that:

9 Defendant has no significant contacts in the District of Arizona;

9 Defendant has no resources in the United States from which he/she might

make a bond reasonably calculated to assure his/her future appearance;

: Defendant has a prior criminal history;

: Defendant has a record of, and convictions for, failures to appear in court as ordered;

9 Defendant attempted to evade law enforcement contact by fleeing from law

enforcement;

9 Defendant is facing a minimum mandatory of incarceration and

a maximum of if convicted;

9 Defendant does not dispute the information contained in the Pretrial Services Report, and

all supplements, if any, except:

 

: In addition:

1. Defendant, age 47, was placed on State probation only two weeks before she is alleged 

to have committed the federal crimes in the indictment; 2. Defendant does not have stable

employment; 3. Defendant suffers from mental health issues and has attempted suicide 

twice due to depression; 4. Defendant admits to using methamphetamine weekly and used

it two days before her arrest; 5. The Government has a very strong case against Defendant

and conviction is likely; 6. Defendant’s mental health and illicit drug usage render her 

inherently unreliable and trustworty and she is likely motivated to flee a significant prison

sentence.

The Court incorporates by reference the findings of the Pretrial Services report and

all supplements, if any, which were reviewed by the Court at or before the time of the hearing

in this matter.

Case 2:13-cr-00628-GMS Document 16 Filed 05/21/13 Page 3 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 4 -

PART III -- DIRECTIONS REGARDING DETENTION

IT IS ORDERED that Defendant is hereby committed to the custody of the Attorney

General or his/her designated representative for confinement in a corrections facility

separate, to the extent practicable, from persons awaiting or serving sentences or being held

in custody pending appeal. 18 U.S.C. § 3142(i)(2). Defendant shall be afforded a reasonable

opportunity for private consultation with defense counsel. 18 U.S.C. § 3142 (i)(3). Upon

order of a court of the United States or request of an attorney for the Govern-ment, the person

in charge of the corrections facility shall deliver Defendant to the United States Marshal

Service for the purpose of an appearance in connection with a court proceeding. 18 U.S.C.

§ 3142(i)(4).

PART IV -- APPEALS AND THIRD PARTY RELEASE

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that should a review of this detention order be filed

pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3145, it is the responsibility of the movant’s attorney to deliver a

copy of the motion for review to U.S. Pretrial Services, at least, one day prior to the review

hearing set before the assigned District Judge. Pursuant to Rule 59(a), Fed.R. Crim.P. (2010),

a party seeking review shall have fourteen (14) days to file a motion for review after being

served with a copy of this written order, after the oral order is stated on the record, or at some

other time the assigned District Judge may set. Failure to timely file a motion for review in

accordance with Rule 59(a) may waive the right to review. Rule 59(a), Fed.R.Crim.P.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the issue of detention may be reopened at any

time before trial upon a finding that information exists that was not known to the movant at

the time of the detention hearing and such information has a material bearing on the issue

whether there are conditions of release that will reasonably assure the appearance of

Defendant as required and the safety of any other person and the community. Title 18 U.S.C.

§ 3142(f). 

 DATED this 21st day of May, 2013.

Case 2:13-cr-00628-GMS Document 16 Filed 05/21/13 Page 4 of 4