Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_10-cv-00475/USCOURTS-caed-1_10-cv-00475-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Agri-Comm Express, Inc.
Counter Claimant
Carolina Casualty Insurance Company
Counter Defendant
Concepcion Garcia
Defendant
Quetzal Garcia
Defendant
Systems Logistics, Inc.
Defendant
Tech Logistics Corp.
Counter Claimant
Trucking Equipment Company, Inc.
Counter Claimant
Eliseo Ontiveros Valdez
Counter Claimant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

John C. Kiehlmeier, Esq. (SBN: 124083)

LAW OFFICES OF JOHN C. KIEHLMEIER

P. O. Box 1144

Corona del Mar, California 92625

Telephone: (949) 274-4614

Attorney for defendants 

(see signature page)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CAROLINA CASUALTY INSURANCE

COMPANY, an Iowa corporation,

 Plaintiffs,

vs.

TECH LOGISTICS CORP. DBA SYSTEMS

LOGISTICS, INC., a Texas corporation;

CONCEPCION GARCIA, an individual;

QUETZAL GARCIA, a minor child; ELISEO

ONTIVEROS VALDEZ, an individual; AGRICOMM EXPRESS, INC., a California

corporation; and TRUCKING EQUIPMENT

COMPANY, INC., a Wisconsin corporation, 

 Defendants.

_________________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO. 1:10-CV-0475-OWW-GSA

STIPULATION AND (PROPOSED)

ORDER RE: EXTENSION OF TIME

FOR DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO

COMPLAINT

[Local Rule 144, Fed. R. Civ. P. 6]

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATEDbyand betweenHoward Wollitz, Esq., Charlston, Revich & Wollitz

LLP, counsel for PlaintiffCAROLINACASAULTYINSURANCE COMPANY, (hereinafter “Plaintiff”),

and John C. Kiehlmeier, Esq., Law Offices of John C. Kiehlmeier, counsel for Defendants TECH

LOGISTICS CORPORATION d/b/a SYSTEMS LOGISTICS SERVICES, SYSTEMS LOGISTICS,

 1 

STIPULATION and ORDER RE: EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

[Local Rule 144, Fed. R. Civ. P. 6]

Case 1:10-cv-00475-OWW -MJS Document 13 Filed 04/15/10 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

INC., AGRI-COMM EXPRESS, INC., TRUCKING EQUIPMENT COMPANY, INC., and ELISEO

ONTIVEROS VALDEZ (hereinafter collectively “Defendants”) , as follows:

1. Plaintiff has no objection to the extension of time requested byDefendants in the Affidavit of John

C. Kiehlmeier filed on 4-12-10.

2. The failure of counsel for Plaintiff to respond to defense counsel’s email of 4-12-10 as described

in the Affidavit of John C. Kiehlmeier filed on 4-12-10 was due to an addressing error in the email. 

3. The failure of counsel for Plaintiff to respond to defense counsel’s voice mail message left on

4-12-10 was unintentional.

2. All defendants shall have an extension of time to respond to plaintiff’s complaint up to 

and including May 4, 2010.

SO STIPULATED.

Dated: April 13, 2010. CHARLSTN, REVICH & WOLLITZ LLP

By: /s/ Howard Wollitz

HOWARD WOLLITZ, ESQ.

Attorney for Plaintiff

ACE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY

Dated: April 13, 2010. LAW OFFICES OF JOHN C. KIEHLMEIER

By: /s/ John C. Kiehlmeier

JOHN C. KIEHLMEIER, ESQ.

attorney for Defendants,

TECH LOGISTICS CORPORATION d/b/a SYSTEMS 

LOGISTICS SERVICES, SYSTEMS LOGISTICS,

INC., AGRI-COMM EXPRESS, INC., TRUCKING

EQUIPMENT COMPANY, INC., and ELISEO

ONTIVEROS VALDEZ

 2 

STIPULATION and ORDER RE: EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

[Local Rule 144, Fed. R. Civ. P. 6]

Case 1:10-cv-00475-OWW -MJS Document 13 Filed 04/15/10 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

In consideration of the Stipulation of the parties set forth above, the time for defendants 

TECH LOGISTICS CORPORATION d/b/a SYSTEMS LOGISTICS SERVICES, SYSTEMS

LOGISTICS, INC., AGRI-COMM EXPRESS, INC., TRUCKING EQUIPMENT COMPANY, INC.,

and ELISEO ONTIVEROS VALDEZ to respond to plaintiff’s complaint on file in the instant matter is

hereby extended up to and including May 4, 2010.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: April 14, 2010 /s/ Gary S. Austin 

6i0kij UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

 3 

STIPULATION and ORDER RE: EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

[Local Rule 144, Fed. R. Civ. P. 6]

Case 1:10-cv-00475-OWW -MJS Document 13 Filed 04/15/10 Page 3 of 3