Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-02248/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-02248-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Vernita Jackson
Plaintiff
Sacramento Sheriff Department
Defendant

Document Text:

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

VERNITA JACKSON, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

SACRAMENTO SHERIFF 

DEPARTMENT, 

Defendant. 

No. 2:15-cv-2248 AC P (TEMP) 

ORDER 

 Plaintiff, a county jail inmate proceeding pro se, has filed a civil rights action pursuant to 

42 U.S.C. § 1983, together with a request for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff has not 

submitted her in forma pauperis request on a proper form. 

 Plaintiff’s request for leave to proceed in forma pauperis will be denied, and plaintiff will 

be granted thirty days to submit a new request on a proper form. Plaintiff is cautioned that the 

form includes a section that must be completed by a county jail official, and the application form 

must be accompanied by a certified copy of plaintiff’s trust account statement for the six-month 

period immediately preceding the filing of this action. 

 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 

 1. Plaintiff’s October 28, 2015 motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. No. 

2) is denied without prejudice; 

Case 2:15-cv-02248-TLN-AC Document 5 Filed 11/12/15 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2

 2. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send plaintiff an Application to Proceed In Forma 

Pauperis By a Prisoner for use in a civil rights action; and 

 3. Plaintiff shall submit, within thirty days from the date of this order, a properly 

completed application to proceed in forma pauperis on the form provided with this order; plaintiff 

is cautioned that failure to comply with this order or seek an extension of time to do so will result 

in a recommendation that this action be dismissed without prejudice. 

DATED: November 10, 2015 

Case 2:15-cv-02248-TLN-AC Document 5 Filed 11/12/15 Page 2 of 2