Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-10-06542/USCOURTS-ca4-10-06542-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
John Doe
Appellee
James J. Hundley
Appellant
Ronald Revish
Appellee
Aaron Sumpter
Appellee

Document Text:

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-6542

JAMES J. HUNDLEY,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

RONALD REVISH, Probation Officer; AARON SUMPTER, Probation 

Officer; JOHN DOE, District Supervisor,

Defendants – Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, 

District Judge. (1:10-cv-00068-LMB-IDD)

Submitted: July 27, 2010 Decided: August 6, 2010

Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and WILKINSON and KEENAN, Circuit 

Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James J. Hundley, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 10-6542 Doc: 25 Filed: 08/06/2010 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

James J. Hundley appeals the district court’s order 

dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C. 

§ 1915A(b) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no 

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated 

by the district court. See Hundley v. Revish, No. 1:10-cv00068-LMB-IDD (E.D. Va. filed Mar. 31, 2010; entered Apr. 1, 

2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

AFFIRMED

Appeal: 10-6542 Doc: 25 Filed: 08/06/2010 Pg: 2 of 2