Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-04019/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-04019-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Roseanne Sakamoto
Plaintiff
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Defendant

Document Text:

U

nite

d

States District C

o

u

rt

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

U

nite

d

States District C

o

u

rt

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ROSEANNE SAKAMOTO,

Plaintiff,

 v.

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL

PROTECTION AGENCY,

Defendant.

 /

No. C 05-4019 SI

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION FOR COURT ORDER AS

UNNECESSARY

On November 1, 2006, plaintiff filed a “motion requesting court order” regarding defendant’s

failure to reimburse her $199.00 related to one of plaintiff’s FOIA requests. On November 2, 2006,

defendant filed the Declaration of Loiscene Watson, which states that on November 2, defendant

completed its processing of plaintiff’s reimbursement and forwarded a request to the United States

Treasury Department for payment. Watson’s declaration also states that upon receipt of defendant’s

reimbursement request, the Treasury will pay $199.00 to plaintiff by electronic funds transfer.

Accordingly, the Court DENIES plaintiff’s motion as it appears unnecessary for the Court to

issue any further order regarding the reimbursement. (Docket No. 64). Plaintiff may seek appropriate

relief from this Court in the event she does not receive the reimbursement.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: November 17, 2006 

SUSAN ILLSTON

United States District Judge

Case 3:05-cv-04019-SI Document 68 Filed 11/17/06 Page 1 of 1