Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-16-01754/USCOURTS-ca4-16-01754-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Mark C. Busack
Petitioner

Document Text:

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-1754

In re: MARK C. BUSACK,

 Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus

(5:14-cr-00054-FPS-JES-1, 5:15-cv-00151-FPS-JES)

Submitted: November 17, 2016 Decided: November 21, 2016

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and MOTZ and TRAXLER, Circuit 

Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Mark C. Busack, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 16-1754 Doc: 11 Filed: 11/21/2016 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Mark C. Busack petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging 

that the district court has unduly delayed in ruling on his 28 

U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. He seeks an order from this court 

directing the district court to act. We find the present record 

does not reveal undue delay in the district court. Accordingly, 

we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and deny the 

mandamus petition. We dispense with oral argument because the 

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

Appeal: 16-1754 Doc: 11 Filed: 11/21/2016 Pg: 2 of 2