Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_17-cv-02303/USCOURTS-caed-2_17-cv-02303-2/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Katie Feeney
Plaintiff
United States of America
Defendant

Document Text:

Feeney v. United States, No. 2:17-cv-02303 JAM-AC 1

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO MODIFY SCHEDULING ORDER 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

McGREGOR W. SCOTT

United States Attorney

CHI SOO KIM

Assistant United States Attorney

501 I Street, Suite 10-100

Sacramento, CA 95814

Telephone: (916) 554-2700

Facsimile: (916) 554-2900

Attorneys for United States of America

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KATIE FEENEY,

 Plaintiff,

 v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Defendant.

CASE NO. 2:17-cv-02303 JAM-AC

JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER TO 

MODIFY THE SCHEDULING ORDER [ECF 

No. 11]

Plaintiff Katie Feeney and Defendant United States respectfully propose and stipulate to modify 

the current scheduling order as set forth below. Joint Stip. and Order to Modify the Status (Pre-trial 

Scheduling) Order [ECF No. 11]. There is good cause to modify the schedule due to Plaintiff’s complex 

medical condition, which includes disarticulation (i.e., amputation). In order to proceed with and 

complete both fact and expert discovery, the parties agree that Plaintiff must undergo various medical 

exams. Due to Plaintiff’s complex medical condition, which includes the coordination of medical care 

with different physicians at different medical institutions across the country, additional medical 

treatment and surgeries were undertaken. Plaintiff began her medical exams in the fall but was not able 

to complete them due to her various medical complications, and the parties are currently re-scheduling 

them. As a result, the parties respectfully request a modification of the scheduling order to allow the 

parties to complete fact and expert discovery. 

The parties have been working together cooperatively and will continue to update the Court with 

the case status. The parties are working towards an efficient resolution of this matter as required and 

Case 2:17-cv-02303-JAM-AC Document 14 Filed 02/07/20 Page 1 of 2
Feeney v. United States, No. 2:17-cv-02303 JAM-AC 2

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO MODIFY SCHEDULING ORDER 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

promoted in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 1. 

Schedule Current Proposed

- Plaintiff’s Expert Disclosures Jan. 6, 2020 April 24, 2020

- Defendant’s Expert Disclosures Feb. 3, 2020 June 5, 2020

- Supplemental Expert Disclosures Feb. 21, 2020 June 25, 2020

- Discovery Cutoff March 20, 2020 July 24, 2020 

- Dispositive Motion Filing Deadline April 10, 2020 Aug. 18, 2020

- Last Day for Dispositive Motions to be Heard May 12, 2020 Sep. 15, 2020

- Final Pretrial Conference July 14, 2020 Oct. 16, 2020 at 11:00 

a.m.

- Trial (Bench, 8 days) Sep. 14, 2020 Nov. 16, 2020 at 9:00 

a.m.

Respectfully submitted,

Dated: February 6, 2020

By:

McGREGOR W. SCOTT

United States Attorney

/s/ Chi Soo Kim

Chi Soo Kim

Assistant United States Attorney

Attorneys for the United States

 BOSTWICK & PETERSON, LLP

Dated: February 6, 2020

 /s/ James S. Bostwick (auth’d 2/6/20)

 James S. Bostwick, Esq.

 Attorneys for Plaintiff Katie Feeney

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: 2/7/2020

/s/ John A. Mendez_________

JOHN A. MENDEZ

United States District Court Judge

Case 2:17-cv-02303-JAM-AC Document 14 Filed 02/07/20 Page 2 of 2