Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-01878/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-01878-3/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Ken Clark
Respondent
Arthur Ramirez
Petitioner

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ARTHUR RAMIREZ, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

)

v. )

)

)

KEN CLARK, )

)

Respondent. )

 )

1:06-cv-01878 LJO-TAG (HC) 

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

(Doc. 12)

ORDER DISMISSING PETITION FOR WRIT

OF HABEAS CORPUS

(Doc. 1)

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO

ENTER JUDGMENT

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. 

On April 10, 2008, the Magistrate Judge assigned to the case filed a Findings and

Recommendations recommending that the petition for writ of habeas corpus be DISMISSED for

violation of the AEDPA's one-year limitations period. (Doc. 12). The Findings and

Recommendations were served on all parties and contained notice that any objections were to be

filed within fifteen days from the date of service of that order. On April 28, 2008, Petitioner filed

objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations. (Doc. 13). 

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a de

novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, including Petitioner's objections,

the Court concludes that the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations are supported by the

Case 1:06-cv-01878-LJO-TAG Document 14 Filed 05/05/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

record and proper analysis. Petitioner's objections present no grounds for questioning the Magistrate

Judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations issued April 10, 2008 (Doc. 12), is ADOPTED IN

FULL; 

2. The petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. 1) is DISMISSED; and

3. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to ENTER JUDGMENT for Respondent and close the

file.

This order terminates the action in its entirety.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 1, 2008 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill 

b9ed48 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-01878-LJO-TAG Document 14 Filed 05/05/08 Page 2 of 2