Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_14-cv-03160/USCOURTS-cand-4_14-cv-03160-4/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
International Game Technology
Defendant
Mark Nicely
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

CASE NO. 14-03160 HSG -1- STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF 

VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE 

PURSUANT TO FRCP 41(A)(1)

Richard A. Hoyer (SBN 151931)

rhoyer@hoyerlaw.com

Ryan L. Hicks (SBN 260284)

rhicks@hoyerlaw.com

HOYER & ASSOCIATES

4 Embarcadero Center, Suite 1400

San Francisco, CA 94111

Telephone: +1.415.766.3539

Facsimile: +1.415.276.1738

Attorneys for Plaintiff

MARK NICELY

Aaron L. Agenbroad (State Bar No. 242613)

alagenbroad@JonesDay.com

Catherine S. Nasser (State Bar No. 246191)

cnasser@JonesDay.com

Allison E. Crow (State Bar No. 279078)

acrow@jonesday.com

JONES DAY

555 California Street, 26th Floor

San Francisco, CA 94104

Telephone: +1.415.626.3939

Facsimile: +1.415.875.5700

Attorneys for Defendant

INTERNATIONAL GAME TECHNOLOGY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MARK NICELY,

Plaintiff,

v.

INTERNATIONAL GAME 

TECHNOLOGY, a Nevada Corporation, 

and DOES 1-25,

Defendants.

Case No. 14-03160 HSG

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER OF VOLUNTARY 

DISMISSAL OF THE COMPLAINT, 

IN ITS ENTIRETY WITH

PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO FRCP 

41(A)(2)

Plaintiff Mark Nicely (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant International Game Technology (“IGT” 

or “Defendant”) hereby stipulate, by and through their respective counsel of record, that the 

above-referenced action is dismissed in its entirety with prejudice, with all parties to bear their 

Case 4:14-cv-03160-HSG Document 46 Filed 03/05/15 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

CASE NO. 14-03160 HSG -2- STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF 

VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE 

PURSUANT TO FRCP 41(A)(1)

own costs and fees incurred herein. The parties request that the Court enter an Order to this 

effect. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Dated: March 4, 2015

Respectfully submitted,

HOYER & ASSOCIATES

By: /s/ Ryan L. Hicks 

Ryan L. Hicks

Attorneys for Plaintiff

MARK NICELY

Dated: March 4, 2015 JONES DAY

By: /s/ Aaron L. Agenbroad

Aaron L. Agenbroad

Attorneys for Defendant

INTERNATIONAL GAME TECHNOLOGY

Pursuant to stipulation, the court orders that the above-referenced action, in its entirety, be 

dismissed, with prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: _____________________________ ____________________________________

The Honorable Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr.

United States District Court Judge

3/5/2015

Case 4:14-cv-03160-HSG Document 46 Filed 03/05/15 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

CASE NO. 14-03160 HSG -3- STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF 

VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE 

PURSUANT TO FRCP 41(A)(1)

SIGNATURE ATTESTATION

I hereby attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from all 

persons whose signatures are indicated by a “conformed” signature (/S/) within this e-filed 

document.

Dated: March 4, 2015 HOYER & ASSOCIATES

By: /s/ Ryan L. Hicks

Ryan L. Hicks

Attorneys for Plaintiff

MARK NICELY

SFI-620899279v1

Case 4:14-cv-03160-HSG Document 46 Filed 03/05/15 Page 3 of 3