Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-00326/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-00326-2/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Marilyn Carter
Defendant
Sharon Chernoff
Defendant
Mike Davis
Defendant
Marilyn Elan
Defendant
Virginia Greer
Defendant
Miriam Joya
Defendant
Dominie Ly
Defendant
Linda Maul
Defendant
Edward Olesky
Defendant
Michael Pegram
Plaintiff
Amy Pfenning
Defendant
Consuela Turpin
Defendant
Tom Voss
Defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MICHAEL PEGRAM,

Plaintiff,

v.

TOM VOSS, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

CASE NO. 1:06-cv-00326-AWI-SMS P

ORDER FINDING SERVICE OF COMPLAINT

APPROPRIATE, AND FORWARDING

SERVICE DOCUMENTS TO PLAINTIFF FOR

COMPLETION AND RETURN

(Doc. 1) 

Plaintiff Michael Pegram (“plaintiff”) is a civil detainee proceeding pro se and in forma

pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The court screened plaintiff’s

complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) and finds that it states cognizable claims for relief

under section 1983 against defendants Voss, Olesky, Chernoff, Turpin, Maul, Joya, Carter, Greer,

Ly, Pfenning, Elan, and Davis for violation of the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.

Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a); Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A., 534 U.S. 506, 512-15 (2002); Hydrick v.

Hunter, 466 F.3d 676, 697 (9th Cir. 2006). Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Service is appropriate for the following defendants:

TOM VOSS

EDWARD OLESKY

SHARON CHERNOFF

CONSUELA TURPIN

LINDA MAUL

MIRIAM JOYA

Case 1:06-cv-00326-AWI -SMS Document 11 Filed 12/13/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

MARILYN CARTER

VIRGINIA GREER

DOMINIE LY

AMY PFENNING

MARILYN ELAN

MIKE DAVIS

2. The Clerk of the Court shall send plaintiff twelve (12) USM-285 forms, twelve (12)

summonses, a Notice of Submission of Documents form, an instruction sheet and a

copy of the complaint filed March 8, 2006.

3. Within thirty (30) days from the date of this order, plaintiff shall complete the

attached Notice of Submission of Documents and submit the completed Notice to the

court with the following documents:

a. Completed summons;

b. One completed USM-285 form for each defendant listed above; and 

c. Thirteen (13) copies of the endorsed complaint filed March 8, 2006. 

4. Plaintiff need not attempt service on defendants and need not request waiver of

service. Upon receipt of the above-described documents, the court will direct the

United States Marshal to serve the above-named defendants pursuant to Federal Rule

of Civil Procedure 4 without payment of costs. 

5. The failure to comply with this order will result in a recommendation that this action

be dismissed.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: December 12, 2006 /s/ Sandra M. Snyder 

icido3 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-00326-AWI -SMS Document 11 Filed 12/13/06 Page 2 of 2