Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-02917/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-02917-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Raymond Tate
Plaintiff
Unknown
Defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RAYMOND TATE,

Petitioner,

v.

UNKNOWN,

Respondent.

No. 2:14-cv-2917 CKD P

ORDER AND 

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

By an order filed December 22, 2014, petitioner was ordered to file a request to proceed in 

forma pauperis or to pay the appropriate filing fee, within thirty days, or his petition for writ of 

habeas corpus would be dismissed. The thirty day period has now expired, and petitioner has not 

responded to the court’s order. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the 

Court assign a district court judge to this case and IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this 

action be dismissed without prejudice.

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 

after being served with these findings and recommendations, petitioner may file written 

objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s 

Findings and Recommendations.” Petitioner is advised that failure to file objections within the 

/////

Case 2:14-cv-02917-WBS-CKD Document 5 Filed 02/03/15 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 

F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

Dated: February 3, 2015

1

tate2917.fifp

_____________________________________

CAROLYN K. DELANEY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:14-cv-02917-WBS-CKD Document 5 Filed 02/03/15 Page 2 of 2