Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-15-01751/USCOURTS-ca4-15-01751-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
BWW Law Group, LLC
Appellee
Bank of America
Appellee
Howard N. Bierman
Appellee
Equity Trustees, LLC
Appellee
Mark R. Galbraith
Appellee
Janice Wolk Grenadier
Appellant
Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC
Appellee
Wells Fargo
Appellee

Document Text:

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-1751

JANICE WOLK GRENADIER,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

BWW LAW GROUP, LLC, f/k/a Bierman, Geesing, Ward & Wood, 

LLC; HOWARD N. BIERMAN; EQUITY TRUSTEES, LLC; MARK R. 

GALBRAITH; WELLS FARGO; BANK OF AMERICA, f/k/a LaSalle Bank 

N.A., as successor-in-interest, Jointly and Severally, in 

their Official and Personal Capacities; OCWEN LOAN 

SERVICING, LLC, Jointly and Severally, in their Official 

and Personal Capacities,

Defendants – Appellees,

and

BANK OF AMERICA, f/k/a LaSalle Bank N.A.,

Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, 

District Judge. (1:14-cv-00827-LMB-TCB)

Submitted: November 17, 2015 Decided: November 20, 2015

Before WILKINSON and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, 

Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Appeal: 15-1751 Doc: 7 Filed: 11/20/2015 Pg: 1 of 3
2

Janice Wolk Grenadier, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Ryan Michael, 

BWW LAW GROUP, LLC, Richmond, Virginia; Syed Mohsin Reza, Mary 

Catherine Zinsner, TROUTMAN SANDERS LLP, Tysons Corner, 

Virginia; Nathaniel Patrick Lee, MCGUIREWOODS, LLP, Tysons 

Corner, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 15-1751 Doc: 7 Filed: 11/20/2015 Pg: 2 of 3
3

PER CURIAM:

Janice Grenadier appeals the district court’s orders

denying her various post-judgment motions. We have reviewed the 

record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for 

the reasons stated by the district court. Grenadier v. BWW Law 

Group, LLC, No. 1:14-cv-00827-LMB-TCB (E.D. Va. June 15 & 29,

2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

AFFIRMED

Appeal: 15-1751 Doc: 7 Filed: 11/20/2015 Pg: 3 of 3