Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-01195/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-01195-8/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Edward Don Brown
Petitioner
Yates
Respondent

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

EDWARD DON BROWN,

Petitioner, No. 2:05-cv-1195 LKK DAD (HC)

vs.

WARDEN YATES, 

Respondent. ORDER

 /

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with an application for a writ of

habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On December 13, 2010, a request for extension of

time to file a request for a certificate of appealability and for appointment of counsel prepared by

petitioner was received in the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. That

document was transferred to this court and entered on this court’s docket. On December 17,

2010, the document was construed as containing a notice of appeal which was processed to the

United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

The record reflects that petitioner’s application for a writ of habeas corpus was 

denied by the district court on March 31, 2009, and judgment was entered on the same day. On

January 8, 2010, petitioner filed a motion pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b). That motion was

denied by the district court on August 31, 2010. In the same order, the district court denied

petitioner’s request for appointment of counsel and declined to issue a certificate of appealability. 

Case 2:05-cv-01195-DAD-CSK Document 40 Filed 01/03/11 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Since the district court has denied petitioner’s request for appointment of counsel and declined to

issue a certificate of appealability, this court will take no further action on the requests contained

in the document filed by petitioner on December 13, 2010. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is directed to

send a copy of this order to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. 

DATED: January 3, 2011.

DAD:12

brow1195.o

Case 2:05-cv-01195-DAD-CSK Document 40 Filed 01/03/11 Page 2 of 2