Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_10-cv-01138/USCOURTS-caed-1_10-cv-01138-6/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Corey Taylor
Plaintiff
Jotasha Taylor
Plaintiff
Walmart, Inc.
Defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

COREY TAYLOR; JOTASHA TAYLOR, )

)

)

)

Plaintiffs, )

)

v. )

)

WALMART, INC., )

)

)

)

Defendant. )

 )

1:10cv01138 OWW DLB

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

SUMMARY JUDGMENT

(Document 5)

Plaintiffs Corey Taylor and Jotasha Taylor (“Plaintiffs”) are proceeding pro se and in

forma pauperis in this action. Plaintiffs filed their complaint upon which this action proceeds on

June 24, 2010. Now pending before the court is Plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment, which

was filed on July 6, 2010. 

On July 29, 2010, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2), the court conducted an initial

review of the complaint for sufficiency to state a claim. The court required Plaintiffs to either

file an amended complaint or a notice of their willingness to proceed only on claims found to be

cognizable. On July 30, 2010, Plaintiffs filed a notice of their willingness to proceed only on

claims found cognizable. 

At this juncture, the complaint has not been served on defendant. Plaintiffs’ motion for

summary judgment is premature and is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. IT IS SO

ORDERED.

Emm0d6Dated: August 6, 2010 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

1

Case 1:10-cv-01138-LJO -DLB Document 12 Filed 08/09/10 Page 1 of 1