Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-07-07611/USCOURTS-ca4-07-07611-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Duke William Linzy
Appellant
United States of America
Appellee

Document Text:

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-7611

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

DUKE WILLIAM LINZY,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern

District of West Virginia, at Charleston. Joseph R. Goodwin, Chief

District Judge. (2:06-cr-00160)

Submitted: July 22, 2008 Decided: July 24, 2008

Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Duke William Linzy, Appellant Pro Se. Monica Kaminski Schwartz,

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charleston, West Virginia,

for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 07-7611 Doc: 10 Filed: 07/24/2008 Pg: 1 of 2
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Duke William Linzy appeals the district court’s order

denying his motion to reconsider his sentence, construed as filed

under Fed. R. Crim. P. 35(a). We have reviewed the record and find

no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court. United States v. Linzy, No. 2:06-cr-00160

(S.D.W. Va. Oct. 16, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Appeal: 07-7611 Doc: 10 Filed: 07/24/2008 Pg: 2 of 2