Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-19-01586/USCOURTS-ca4-19-01586-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
William P. Barr
Appellee
Jose Ernesto Valle-Alvarez
Appellant

Document Text:

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-1586

JOSE ERNESTO VALLE-ALVAREZ,

 Petitioner,

v.

WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General,

 Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals.

Submitted: February 20, 2020 Decided: March 11, 2020

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and AGEE and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Gina M. Takemori, TAKEMORI LAW, Germantown, Maryland, for Petitioner. Joseph H. 

Hunt, Assistant Attorney General, Stephen J. Flynn, Assistant Director, Kathryn M. 

McKinney, Office of Immigration Litigation, Civil Division, UNITED STATES 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 19-1586 Doc: 25 Filed: 03/11/2020 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Jose Ernesto Valle-Alvarez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of 

an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) denying his motion to reconsider. 

We have reviewed the administrative record and Valle-Alvarez’s claims, and conclude that 

the Board did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a), 

(b)(1) (2019); Narine v. Holder, 559 F.3d 246, 249 (4th Cir. 2009); Jean v. Gonzales, 435 

F.3d 475, 481, 483 (4th Cir. 2006). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the 

reasons stated by the Board. See In re Valle-Alvarez (B.I.A. May 15, 2019). We dispense 

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

USCA4 Appeal: 19-1586 Doc: 25 Filed: 03/11/2020 Pg: 2 of 2