Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-19-07504/USCOURTS-ca4-19-07504-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Lee Correctional Institution
Appellee
Leroy Staton
Appellant

Document Text:

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-7504

LEROY L. STATON,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

SUPERINTENDENT LEE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at 

Anderson. Timothy M. Cain, District Judge. (8:19-cv-01805-TMC)

Submitted: February 20, 2020 Decided: February 25, 2020

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, RUSHING, Circuit Judge, and TRAXLER, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Leroy Staton, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 19-7504 Doc: 7 Filed: 02/25/2020 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Leroy Staton seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation 

of the magistrate judge and dismissing Staton’s 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2018) petition as an 

unauthorized, successive § 2254 petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit 

justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A) (2018). 

A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2018). When, as here, the district court 

denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive 

procedural ruling is debatable and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of 

a constitutional right. Gonzalez v. Thaler, 565 U.S. 134, 140-41 (2012) (citing Slack v. 

McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000)). 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Staton has not made 

the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the 

appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process. 

DISMISSED

USCA4 Appeal: 19-7504 Doc: 7 Filed: 02/25/2020 Pg: 2 of 2