Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_13-cv-01159/USCOURTS-caed-1_13-cv-01159-2/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Nathan Serpa
Plaintiff
Stanislaus County
Defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

On September 30, 2013, Defendant Stanislaus County (“Defendant”) filed a motion to dismiss. 

In response, on October 14, 2013, Plaintiff Nathan Serpa (“Plaintiff’) filed an amended complaint as a 

matter of course pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a)(1)(B). Accordingly, the Court:

1. VACATES the October 28, 2013 hearing set for Defendant’s motion to dismiss;

2. DENIES Defendant’s motion to dismiss as moot; and

3. INSTRUCTS Defendant to file and serve a response to the amended complaint by no 

later than November 5, 2013.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 15, 2013 /s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE DEAC_Signature-END:

NATHAN SERPA, 

 Plaintiff,

v.

STANISLAUS COUNTY,

Defendant.

/

Case No. 1:13-cv-1159 LJO BAM

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS 

AS MOOT 

(Doc. 18)

Case 1:13-cv-01159-LJO-BAM Document 22 Filed 10/15/13 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

b9ed48bb

Case 1:13-cv-01159-LJO-BAM Document 22 Filed 10/15/13 Page 2 of 2