Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cr-00456/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cr-00456-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Hector Guillermo Ramirez De Leon
Defendant
USA
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[PROPOSED[ ORDER AND

STIPULATION EXCLUDING TIME 

CR 07 0456 SI

SCOTT N. SCHOOLS (SCBN 9990)

United States Attorney

BRIAN J. STRETCH (CABN 163973)

Chief, Criminal Division

WENDY THOMAS (NYBN 4315420)

Special Assistant United States Attorney

450 Golden Gate Avenue

San Francisco, California 94102

Telephone: (415) 436-6809

Facsimile: (415) 436-7234

E-Mail: wendy.thomas@usdoj.gov

Attorneys for Plaintiff

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

HECTOR GUILLERMO RAMIREZ DE

LEON,

Defendant.

 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Criminal No. CR 07 0456 SI

[PROPOSED] ORDER AND

STIPULATION EXCLUDING TIME

FROM AUGUST 17, 2007 TO

SEPTEMBER 14, 2007

The parties appeared before the Honorable Susan Illston on August 17, 2007.

With the agreement of counsel for both parties, the Court found and held as follows:

1. The parties agree to an exclusion of time under the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. §

3161(b), from August 17, 2007 to September 14, 2007, in light of the need for the defendant’s

counsel to review recently-produced discovery. Failure to grant the requested continuance

would unreasonably deny defense counsel reasonable time necessary for effective preparation,

taking into account the exercise of due diligence and the need for counsel to review the

Case 3:07-cr-00456-SI Document 7 Filed 09/09/2007 Page 1 of 2 Case 3:07-cr-00456-SI Document 8 Filed 09/11/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[PROPOSED[ ORDER AND

STIPULATION EXCLUDING TIME 

CR 07 0456 SI 2

discovery with the defendant. 

2. Given these circumstances, the Court found that the ends of justice served by

excluding the period from August 17, 2007 to September 14, 2007, outweigh the best interest of

the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. Id. § 3161(h)(8)(A). 

3. Accordingly, and with the consent of the defendant, the Court ordered that the period

from August 17, 2007 to September 14, 2007, be excluded from Speedy Trial Act calculations

under 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(A) & (B)(iv).

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

DATED: 8/30/07 /s/ 

JODI LINKER

Counsel for the Defendant

DATED: 8/29/07 /s/ 

WENDY THOMAS

Special Assistant U.S. Attorney

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED:_______________ ________________________________

THE HON. SUSAN ILLSTON

United States District Judge

Case 3:07-cr-00456-SI Document 7 Filed 09/09/2007 Page 2 of 2 Case 3:07-cr-00456-SI Document 8 Filed 09/11/07 Page 2 of 2