Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-01656/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-01656-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Carnival Corporation
Defendant
Tiana Farries
Plaintiff
Imperial Majesty Cruise Line, LLC
Defendant

Document Text:

- 1 - 

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT 

Case No. C 06-1656 JCS 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 EMARD DANOFF PORT

TAMULSKI & PAETZOLD LLP 

49 Stevenson Street 

Suite 400 

San Francisco, CA 94105 

BANNING MICKLOW & BULL LLP 

Edward M. Bull III (State Bar #141996) 

Eugene A. Brodsky (State Bar #36691) 

Jennifer L. Fiore (State Bar #203618) 

1 Market Steuart Tower, Suite 1440 

San Francisco, CA 94105 

Telephone: (415) 399-9191 

Facsimile: (415) 399-9192 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

TIANA FARRIES 

EMARD DANOFF PORT TAMULSKI & PAETZOLD LLP 

James J. Tamulski (State Bar #64880) 

Katharine Essick (State Bar #219426) 

Jared A. Washkowitz (State Bar #226211) 

49 Stevenson Street, Suite 400 

San Francisco, CA 94105 

Telephone: (415) 227-9455 

Facsimile: (415) 227-4255 

E-Mail: jtamulski@edptlaw.com 

 kessick@edptlaw.com 

Attorneys for Defendant 

IMPERIAL MAJESTY CRUISE LINE, LLC 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

TIANA FARRIES, 

 Plaintiff, 

 vs. 

IMPERIAL MAJESTY CRUISE LINE, 

LLC and CARNIVAL CORPORATION, 

 Defendants. 

 Case No.: C 06-1656 JCS 

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO 

RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

Case 3:06-cv-01656-JCS Document 9 Filed 05/01/2006 Page 1 of 2
 Case 3:06-cv-01656-JCS Document 11 Filed 05/02/06 Page 1 of 2
- 2 - 

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT 

Case No. C 06-1656 JCS 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 EMARD DANOFF PORT

TAMULSKI & PAETZOLD LLP 

49 Stevenson Street 

Suite 400 

San Francisco, CA 94105 

Pursuant N.D. Cal. Local Rule 6-1, 

WHEREAS defendant Imperial Majesty Cruise Line, LLC, has not yet appeared in the 

case and its attorneys only recently received the Complaint and Summons; 

WHEREAS plaintiff Tiana Farries has agreed to extend the time of defendant Imperial 

Majesty Cruise Line, LLC, to respond to the Complaint to May 12, 2006; 

WHEREAS the extension of time will not alter the date of any event or any deadline 

already fixed by this Court’s case management orders, standing orders, or any other order of the 

Court; 

THE PARTIES HEREBY STIPULATE that defendant Imperial Majesty Cruise Line, 

LLC, shall respond to the Complaint on or before May 12, 2006. 

 SO STIPULATED. 

DATED: May 1, 2006 BANNING MICKLOW & BULL LLP 

 By /s/ Jennifer Fiore 

Jennifer Fiore 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

TIANA FARRIES 

DATED: May 1, 2006 EMARD DANOFF PORT TAMULSKI & PAETZOLD LLP 

 By /s/ Katharine Essick 

Katharine Essick 

Attorneys for Defendant 

IMPERIAL MAJESTY CRUISE LINE, LLC 

Case 3:06-cv-01656-JCS Document 9 Filed 05/01/2006 Page 2 of 2

Dated: May 2, 2006

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Joseph C. Spero

Case 3:06-cv-01656-JCS Document 11 Filed 05/02/06 Page 2 of 2