Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_13-cv-00093/USCOURTS-caed-1_13-cv-00093-7/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
City of Delano, California
Defendant
Robin Moniz
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

30

31

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

30

31

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

On January 12, 2015, the plaintiff notified the Court that the parties had entered into an 

“unconditional” settlement. (Doc. 46) The Court issued an order after this notice vacating the 

impending trial date and requiring that the stipulated dismissal be filed no later than February 13, 

2015. (Doc. 47) 

On February 13, 2015, the parties filed a stipulation seeking additional time to complete 

the settlement. (Doc. 48) The parties notified the Court that “an issue has arisen which the 

parties, by and through their respective counsel of record, have diligently been trying to resolve.” 

Id. at 1. Though counsel do not set forth the nature of the “issues,” the stipulation continued, 

“The parties are hopeful that the issue is resolved, one way or another, over the next few weeks.” 

Id. In response, the Court issued an order extending the deadline to file the dismissal to March 

12, 2015. (Doc. 49)

On March 13, 2015, the parties filed a nearly identical stipulation as they filed in February

ROBIN MONIZ,

 Plaintiff,

v.

CITY OF DELANO, CALIFORNIA,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: 1:13-cv-00093 - JLT

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION FOR AN 

EXTENSION OF TIME TO DISMISS THE 

MATTER

(Doc. 50)

Case 1:13-cv-00093-JLT Document 51 Filed 03/13/15 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

30

31

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

30

31

2

[PROPOSED] ORDER ON STIPULATION TO CONTINUE DEADLINE TO FILE DISPOSITIONAL DOCUMENTS

which recited the exact same information as in the prior stipulation. (Doc. 50) Without providing

any explanation why the “issues” could not resolved in the last 30 days, they seek an extension of 

time until April 10, 2015 to complete the dismissal. (Doc. 50)

The court will GRANT this last stipulation making the filing of the dismissal to occur no 

later than April 10, 2015. No further extensions of time will be granted.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 13, 2015 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:13-cv-00093-JLT Document 51 Filed 03/13/15 Page 2 of 2