Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca8-04-02928/USCOURTS-ca8-04-02928-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
John C. Hetherington
Appellant
United States of America
Appellee

Document Text:

1

The Honorable Ann D. Montgomery, United States District Judge for the

District of Minnesota.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 04-2928

___________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* District of Minnesota.

John C. Hetherington, *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellant. *

___________

Submitted: February 28, 2005

Filed: March 25, 2005

___________

Before MELLOY, McMILLIAN, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

John Hetherington appeals from the order entered in the District Court1

 for the

District of Minnesota denying his motion for reconsideration of the order denying his

Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 33 motion for a new trial based on newly

discovered evidence, and his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) sentence-reduction motion.

Because the notice of appeal is not timely as to the underlying order, this appeal

raises only the question whether the district court abused its discretion in denying the

motion for reconsideration. After careful consideration, we find there was no abuse

Appellate Case: 04-2928 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/25/2005 Entry ID: 1883584 
-2-

of discretion. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. See 8th Cir.

R. 47B.

______________________________

Appellate Case: 04-2928 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/25/2005 Entry ID: 1883584