Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-02446/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-02446-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Jose H. Pacheco
In Re

Document Text:

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

In re 

JOSE H. PACHECO,

Plaintiff.

/

No. C 16-2446 WHA (PR) 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

The clerk opened this case on May 5, 2016, based upon a letter from plaintiff, a

California prisoner proceeding pro se, complainig about the conditions of his confinement. The

clerk notified plaintiff that he must file a complaint and submit either the filing fee or a

completed application to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). Along with these notices, the clerk

mailed to plaintiff a form civil rights complaint, an IFP application, instructions, and a stamped

return envelope. The notices informed plaintiff that the case would be dismissed if he did not

file a complaint and either pay the fee or file the completed IFP application, within 28 days. 

More than 28 days have passed, and no response from plaintiff has been received. Accordingly,

this case is DISMISSED without prejudice. 

The Clerk shall enter judgment and close the file. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 6 , 2016. 

WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:16-cv-02446-WHA Document 4 Filed 06/07/16 Page 1 of 1