Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-09-08003/USCOURTS-ca4-09-08003-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Curtis Antonio Reese
Appellant
United States of America
Appellee

Document Text:

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-8003

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff – Appellee, 

v.

CURTIS ANTONIO REESE,

Defendant – Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Columbia. Cameron McGowan Currie, District 

Judge. (3:03-cr-00729-CMC-1)

Submitted: February 18, 2009 Decided: February 25, 2010

Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Curtis Antonio Reese, Appellant Pro Se. Jane Barrett Taylor, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 09-8003 Doc: 8 Filed: 02/25/2010 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Curtis Antonio Reese appeals the district court’s 

order denying Reese’s 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion. We 

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district 

court. United States v. Reese, No. 3:03-cr-00729-CMC-1 (D.S.C. 

Oct. 6, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts 

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

AFFIRMED

Appeal: 09-8003 Doc: 8 Filed: 02/25/2010 Pg: 2 of 2