Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca5-14-40667/USCOURTS-ca5-14-40667-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Nino Rodriguez
Appellant
United States of America
Appellee

Document Text:

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-40667

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

NINO RODRIGUEZ, also known as Nino Ruben Rodriguez, also known as 

Ruben Rodriguez-Nino, also known as Ruben Rodriguez,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 5:14-CR-191

Before DAVIS, JONES, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Nino Rodriguez has 

moved for leave to withdraw and has filed briefs in accordance with Anders v. 

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th 

Cir. 2011). Rodriguez has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s 

briefs and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

October 6, 2015

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 14-40667 Document: 00513220468 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/06/2015
No. 14-40667

2

counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for 

appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is 

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the 

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

Case: 14-40667 Document: 00513220468 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/06/2015