Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-00103/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-00103-2/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
Defendant
Hadar Meiri
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

HADAR MEIRI,

Plaintiff,

v.

HARTFORD LIFE AND ACCIDENT 

INSURANCE COMPANY,

Defendant.

Case No. 16-cv-00103-JST 

SCHEDULING ORDER

The Court hereby sets the following case deadlines pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil 

Procedure 16 and Civil Local Rule 16-10:

Event Deadline

Deadline to add parties or amend the pleadings April 27, 2016

Fact discovery cut-off September 15, 2016

Plaintiff's motion for judgment pursuant to Rule 52 October 19, 2016

Defendant's motion for judgment pursuant to Rule 52 November 9, 2016

Plaintiff's responsive brief November 30, 2016

Defendant's responsive brief December 21, 2016

Motion hearing January 12, 2017

The Court will not set time limits on argument now, but notes that argument will take less 

than the two hours requested by the parties. ECF No. 18 at 8. 

The Case Management Conference scheduled for April 20, 2016 is VACATED.

Case 3:16-cv-00103-JST Document 19 Filed 04/19/16 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

Counsel may not modify these dates without leave of court. The parties shall comply with 

the Court’s standing orders, which are available at cand.uscourts.gov/jstorders.

The parties must take all necessary steps to conduct discovery, compel discovery, hire 

counsel, retain experts, and manage their calendars so that they can complete discovery in a timely 

manner. All counsel must arrange their calendars to accommodate these dates, or arrange to 

substitute or associate in counsel who can. 

Dates set by this Court should be regarded as firm. Requests for continuance are 

disfavored. The Court will not consider any event subsequently scheduled by a party, partycontrolled witness, expert or attorney that conflicts with the above dates as good cause to grant a 

continuance. The Court will not consider the pendency of settlement discussions as good cause to 

grant a continuance. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 19, 2016

_______________________________________

JON S. TIGAR

United States District Judge

Case 3:16-cv-00103-JST Document 19 Filed 04/19/16 Page 2 of 2