Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-04386/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-04386-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Jesse Bell
Defendant
Integrated Semiconductor Service, Inc.
Plaintiff
JC Technology Sales
Defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

VERNON C. GOINS II (SBN 195461) 

TAYLOR & GOINS LLP 

1330 Broadway, Suite 1701 

Oakland, CA 94612 

Telephone: (510) 893-9465 

Facsimile: (510) 893-4228 

Attorneys for Plaintiff

INTEGRATED SEMICONDUCTOR 

SERVICE, INC. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

INTEGRATED SEMICONDUCTOR 

SERVICE, INC., a California 

corporation, 

 Plaintiff, 

vs. 

JESSE BELL, individually and doing 

business as JC TECHNOLOGY 

SALES, and DOES 1-20, 

Defendants. )

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. C06-04386-MHP ECF 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER STAYING CASE 

 

WHEREAS, Defendant Jesse Bell d/b/a JC Technology Sales (“Bell”) is the plaintiff in 

an action against Plaintiff Integrated Semiconductor Service, Inc. (“Integrated”), originally filed 

in Texas court and removed to the Northern District of Texas (“The Texas Action”); 

AND WHEREAS, Avago Technologies U.S., Inc. (“Avago”) is a co-defendant in The 

Texas Action and has a motion to transfer venue to the Northern District of California pending in 

the Northern District of Texas; 

AND WHEREAS, Bell has filed a pending motion to remand the case to Texas state 

court; 

____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 

STIPULATION FOR ORDER STAYING CASE 

Case No. C06-04386-MHP 

Case 3:06-cv-04386-MHP Document 12 Filed 10/24/06 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

AND WHEREAS, Bell has filed a motion to dismiss or stay the case before the abovecaptioned Court that was initially set to be heard on October 30, 2006 at 9:00 a.m.; 

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between Bell and Integrated, by 

their respective counsel, that the matter be stayed until further court order upon motion of either 

of the parties to lift the stay for good cause shown after the motions pending in the Texas action 

have been resolved.

IT IS HEREBY FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between Bell and 

Integrated, by their respective counsel, that either party may move to lift the stay, for good cause 

shown, once the motions pending in the Texas action have been resolved. 

IT IS HEREBY FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between Bell and 

Integrated, by their respective counsel, that in the event stay is lifted, immediately thereafter Bell 

will request a new hearing date on the motion to dismiss. 

IT IS HEREBY FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between Bell and 

Integrated, by their respective counsel, that once the stay has been lifted, Integrated will have 

until 20 days before the new hearing date to file and serve its papers and Opposition brief to the 

Motion to Dismiss or Stay, and Bell will have until 14 days before the new hearing date to file 

and serve its Reply brief and papers. 

IT IS HEREBY FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between Bell and 

Integrated, by their respective counsel, that if the Court refuses to order this matter stayed, that 

Integrated will have until Friday, October 13, 2006 to file and serve its papers and Opposition 

brief to the Motion to Dismiss or Stay and Plaintiff will have until October 20, 2006 to file a 

reply in support of its Motion to Dismiss or Stay without change to the October 30, 2006 hearing 

date. 

____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 

STIPULATION FOR ORDER STAYING CASE 

Case No. C06-04386-MHP 

Case 3:06-cv-04386-MHP Document 12 Filed 10/24/06 Page 2 of 3
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 

STIPULATION FOR ORDER STAYING CASE 

Case No. C06-04386-MHP 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

Dated: October 3, 2006 

 Oakland, CA TAYLOR & GOINS LLP 

 

 /s/_Vernon C. Goins ______________________

 VERNON C. GOINS 

 Attorneys for Plaintiff 

INTEGRATED SEMICONDUCTOR 

SERVICE, INC. 

Dated: October 3, 2006 

 MASON & PETRUZZI 

 

 /s/_James D. Petruzzi_____________________

 JAMES D. PETRUZZI 

 Attorneys for Defendant 

JESSE BELL d/b/a JC TECHNOLOGY SALES 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED: The parties’ stipulation is approved. 

This matter is stayed until further notice by the parties. 

_______________________________________ 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Dated: October _______, 2006. 

24

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Marilyn H. Patel

Case 3:06-cv-04386-MHP Document 12 Filed 10/24/06 Page 3 of 3