Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca10-89-06220/USCOURTS-ca10-89-06220-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Robert G. Birdsill
Appellant
Collingwood Grain, Inc.
Appellee

Document Text:

FILED 

Uoited Stttff C'.ourr of Appeals 

Tenth Cirruit 

NOV 5 1QQO 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT ROBERT L HOECKER 

Clerk 

ROBERT G. BIRDSILL, ) 

) 

Plaintiff-Appellant, ) 

) 

v. ) 

) 

COLLINGWOOD GRAIN, INC., a corporation, ) 

) 

Defendant-Appellee. ) 

ORDER AND JUDGMENT * 

No. 89-6220 

(D.C. No. 88-1376-R) 

(W.D. Okla.) 

Before McKAY, LOGAN, and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges. 

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel 

has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially 

assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 

34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. 

submitted without oral argument·. 

The case is ther~fore ordered 

After thorough review of the record and consideration of 

appellant's arguments contained in his brief, we affirm for 

substantially the reasons set forth in the district court's 

memorandum and order filed May 30, 1989. We also note that a very 

* This order and judgment has no precedential value and shall 

not be cited, or used by any court within the Tenth Circuit, 

except for purposes of establishing the doctrines of the law of 

the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. 10th Cir. R. 

36.3. 

Appellate Case: 89-6220 Document: 010110047502 Date Filed: 11/05/1990 Page: 1 
recent decision of the Oklahoma Supreme Court has reaffirmed 

adherence to the rule in Oklahoma that a landowner owes no more 

duty to a trespasser than to refrain from "committing a willful, 

wanton or intentional harm." Lohrenz v. Lane, 787 P.2d 1274, 1278 

(Okla. 1990). Appellee's request for damages under 10th Cir. R. 

46.5 and Fed. R. App. P. 38 is denied. 

Accordingly, the judgment of the United States District Court 

for the Western District of Oklahoma is AFFIRMED. 

ENTERED FOR THE COURT 

PER CURIAM 

2 

Appellate Case: 89-6220 Document: 010110047502 Date Filed: 11/05/1990 Page: 2