Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca13-19-01639/USCOURTS-ca13-19-01639-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Lighting Science Group Corporation
Appellee
Satco Products, Inc.
Appellant

Document Text:

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________

SATCO PRODUCTS, INC.,

Appellant

v.

LIGHTING SCIENCE GROUP CORPORATION,

Appellee

______________________

2019-1639

______________________

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark 

Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2017-

01639.

______________________

Decided: March 12, 2020

______________________

ROBERT STEPHAN RIGG, Vedder Price PC, Chicago, IL, 

argued for appellant. Also represented by JOHN K. BURKE,

SUDIP MITRA, DANIEL SHULMAN. 

 KAYVAN B. NOROOZI, Noroozi PC, Los Angeles, CA, argued for appellee. 

 ______________________

Before DYK, CHEN, and STOLL, Circuit Judges.

Case: 19-1639 Document: 56 Page: 1 Filed: 03/12/2020
2 SATCO PRODUCTS, INC. v. LIGHTING SCIENCE GROUP CORP.

PER CURIAM.

In this case, the Board found claim 15 of U.S. Patent 

No. 8,967,844 not unpatentable in view of Tickner and Van 

De Ven based on arguments solely related to the limitations of claim 1, from which claim 15 depends. The Board’s 

decision finding claim 15 of the ‘844 patent not unpatentable in view of Tickner and Van De Ven is supported by substantial evidence. In an earlier, related proceeding—

IPR2017-01280—the Board found claim 1 of the ‘844 patent, unpatentable over Chou and Wegner. On appeal, Petitioner has failed to argue that the Board’s decision 

invalidating claim 1 in the earlier proceeding abrogated the 

basis for the Board’s decision. See MaxLinear, Inc. v. CF 

CRESPE LLC, 880 F.3d 1373 (Fed. Cir. 2018). This argument is thus waived.

AFFIRMED

Case: 19-1639 Document: 56 Page: 2 Filed: 03/12/2020