Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-01919/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-01919-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Ty Bloomquist
Defendant
John Furtuna
Defendant
Davin Lawson
Defendant
Daniel McKeown
Defendant
Saddle Rack, Inc.
Defendant
Scottsdale Insurance Company
Plaintiff

Document Text:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA.

SCOTTSDALE INSURCE COMPANY, an

Ohio Corporation CASE NO. C 07-01919 MJJ

Plaintiff(s), STIPULATION AN (PROPOSED)

ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS v.

SADDLE RACK, INC., DANIEL MCKEOWN, JOHN

FURTUNA, DAVIN LAWSON, TY BLOOMQUIST and

DOES 1-100

Defendant( s).

/

Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the

following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5:

The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process:

Court Processes:

D Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4)

D Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5)

D Mediation (ADR L.R. 6)

(Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is

appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any other form of ADR, must participate in an

ADR phone conference and may not file this form. They must instead file a Notice of Need for

ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R . 3-5)

Private Process:

DO Private ADR (please identif process and provider) TED

The parties agree to hold the ADR session by:

DO the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the order

referring the case to an ADRprocess unless otherwise ordered.)

D other requested deadline

Dated: 7/f//) 1 

Dated:

Attorney for Defendant

David J. Stock

NDC-ADR6

Case 3:07-cv-01919-WHA Document 17 Filed 07/23/07 Page 1 of 4
07-10-2007 09: 53am F rom-RANK I N +14082939514 T-987 p" 002/003 F-091

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SCO~TSDALE INSURACE COMPANY, an

Ohio corpora~ion CASE NO. C 07-01919 MJ'.J

Plaintiff(s), STIPULAT10N AN (PROPOSED)

ORDER SELECTING AOR. PROCESS

v.

SADD~£ KA~. INC.. DAIEL MC~OWN. JO~N

FUl\TIA. CAVIN l.wSOIl. T' BLOKQlJST ar.4

DOES i -100

Defendant(s ).

Counsel report that they ha..e met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the

following stipulation pi.isuant to Civil LR. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5:

The paries agree to paricipate in the following ADR process:

Court p,.ocess~:

D Non-binding Aritrtion (ADR L.R. 4)

o Early Neu~ral Enlucnion (ENE) (ADR L-R. 5)

D Mediation (ADR L.R. 6)

(Nore: Parties who believe thai an early selllf:mem conference Wiih a Magisirate Judge is

appreciably more likely la meet iheir needs ihan any olher form of 4DR. musi pariicipaie in an

ADR phone conference una may n01 file ihis form. They m'll tnsiead file a Noiice of Needfor

ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R . 3-5)

Private Process:

00 Pri\"ate A.R (plef:e ideriiif process and provider) T~n

The plUies agree to hold the ADa. session by:

00 th~ presumpti..e deadline (The deadline is 90 daY$from ihe daie o/Ihe order

referring ¡he case Io un ADR process unli!s oihenvìse ordered. )

D other rt:uestc:d deadline

Date:

Dated: -2(O!~

NC0R

~ ",

Case 3:07-cv-01919-WHA Document 17 Filed 07/23/07 Page 2 of 4
When filing this document in ECF, please be sure to use the appropriate ADR Docket

Event, e.g., "Stipulation and Proposed Order Selecting Early Neutral Evaluation."

(PROPOSED) ORDER

Pursuant to the Stipulation above, the captioned matter is hereby referred to:

D Non-binding Arbitration

D Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE)

D Mediation

DO Private ADR

Deadline for ADR session

DO 90 days from the date of this order.

D other

IT is SO ORDERED.

Dated:

MARTIN J. JENKINS

UNTED STATES DISTRICT ruGE

7/16/07

Case 3:07-cv-01919-WHA Document 17 Filed 07/23/07 Page 3 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

P- 11

~

~ 12

~ :5

C' 0:

13

~o: S ~

.,.

Q) C/ ~ r 14

ÇQ ~0: 15

~ 0

C' I16

S ~ --

Q) 17 í/

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

353970. i 380.22079

PROOF OF SERVICE

Scottsdale Insurance Company v. Saddle Rack, Inc., et aL.

STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

I am employed in the County of Los Angeles, State of California. I am over the age

of 18 years and am not a party to the within action; my business address is 11766

Wilshire Boulevard, Sixtlî Floor, Los Angeles, CA 90025. On July 10, 2007, I

served the following document(s) described as STIPULATION AND lPROPOSEDJ

ORDER SELECTING ADR P'ROCESS on the interested parties in this action as

follows:

by placing a tre copy thereof enclosed in sealed envelopes addressed as follows:

David J. Stock, Esq.. Attorneys for Defendants

Rankin, Landsness, Lahde, SADDLE RACK, INC., DANIEL

Serverian & Stock MCKEOWN, JOHN FURTUNA,

96 North Third Street, Suite 500 DA VIN LAWSON and TY

San Jose, CA 95112-5572 BLOOMQUIST

Tel: 408-293-0463

Fax: 408-293-9514

Email: dstock~rllss.com

(R BY MAIL: By placing a tre copy thereof in a sealed enveloRe addressed as

above, and placing it for collection and mailin& following orâinary business

practices. I am readily familiar with the firm s practice of collection and

processing correspondence, pleadings, and other matters for mailing with the United States Postal service on that same day with postage thereon fully

prepaid at Los Angeles, California in the ordinary course of business. I am

aware that on motion of the party served, service is presumed invalid if the

postal cancellation date or postage meter date is more than one day after date

of deposit for mailing in affidavit.

BY OVERNIGHT COURIER: I caused the above-referenced document(s)

to be delivered to for delivery to the addressee(s).

BY E-MAIL: I transmitted a copy of the foregoing documents(s) via e-mail

to the addressee(s).

BY FAX: I transmitted a copy of the foregoing documents(s) via telecopier to

the facsimile numbers of the addressee( s), and the transmission was reported

as complete and without error.

BY PERSONAL SERVICE: I personally delivered such envelope by hand

to the offices of the addressee(s). .

I declare that I am employed in the office of a member of the bar of this court at

whose direction the service was made.

o

o

o

o

Executed on July 10,2007, at Los Angeles, California.

1/. lilt). _ /) 0

~e'patter~~

3

Case 3:07-cv-01919-WHA Document 17 Filed 07/23/07 Page 4 of 4