Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-14-02025/USCOURTS-ca4-14-02025-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Debra Feaster
Appellant
Federal Express Corporation
Appellee

Document Text:

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-2025

DEBRA FEASTER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Charleston. David C. Norton, District Judge. 

(2:13-cv-02517-DCN)

Submitted: March 24, 2015 Decided: March 31, 2015

Before SHEDD, FLOYD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Debra Feaster, Appellant Pro Se. Lucille Lattimore Nelson, 

OGLETREE DEAKINS NASH SMOAK & STEWART, PC, Charleston, South 

Carolina; Patrick Daniel Riederer, FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION, 

Memphis, Tennessee, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 14-2025 Doc: 14 Filed: 03/31/2015 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Debra Feaster appeals the district court’s order accepting 

the recommendation of the magistrate judge and granting summary 

judgment to Federal Express Corporation on her claims of a 

hostile work environment and discrimination, in violation of 42 

U.S.C. § 1981 (2012), the Age Discrimination in Employment Act 

of 1967, as amended, 29 U.S.C. §§ 621 to 634 (2012), and Title 

VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 

§§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (2012). We have reviewed the record and 

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the 

reasons stated by the district court. Feaster v. Fed. Express 

Corp., No. 2:13-cv-02517-DCN (D.S.C. Aug. 28, 2014). We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Appeal: 14-2025 Doc: 14 Filed: 03/31/2015 Pg: 2 of 2