Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-19-07179/USCOURTS-ca4-19-07179-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Ging-Hwang Tsoa
Appellant
United States of America
Appellee

Document Text:

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-7179

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff - Appellee, 

v. 

GING-HWANG TSOA, a/k/a Felicia Tsoa, 

Defendant - Appellant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at 

Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior District Judge. (1:13-cr-00137-CMH-2; 1:17-cv00910-JCC) 

Submitted: January 21, 2020 Decided: January 23, 2020

Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Ging-Hwang Tsoa, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 

USCA4 Appeal: 19-7179 Doc: 13 Filed: 01/23/2020 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM: 

Ging-Hwang Tsoa was convicted in the district court of conspiracy to commit bank 

fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1349 (2018), and bank fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. 

§§ 2, 1344 (2018), and was sentenced in February 2014 to 30 months’ imprisonment. 

In August 2019, Tsoa filed a notice of appeal. The notice lists various district court case 

numbers but does not properly “designate the judgment, order, or part thereof being 

appealed.” Fed. R. App. P. 3(c)(1)(B). Although Tsoa states in her notice of appeal and 

informal brief that she seeks to appeal orders entered in August and November 2019, there 

are no corresponding orders on or near those dates on the district court’s docket. 

Because it is not possible for us to ascertain the judgment or order that Tsoa wishes 

to appeal, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. See Jackson v. Lightsey, 775 F.3d 

170, 176-77 (4th Cir. 2014). We deny Tsoa’s motions to appoint counsel and schedule oral 

argument. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process. 

DISMISSED

USCA4 Appeal: 19-7179 Doc: 13 Filed: 01/23/2020 Pg: 2 of 2