Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_18-cr-00198/USCOURTS-caed-2_18-cr-00198-7/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
USA
Plaintiff
Daniel Zhu
Defendant

Document Text:

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DAVID D. FISCHER (SBN 224900)

LAW OFFICES OF DAVID D. FISCHER, APC

5701 Lonetree Blvd., Suite 312

Rocklin, CA 95765

Tel. (916) 447-8600

Fax (916) 930-6482

E-Mail: davefischer@yahoo.com

Attorney for Defendant

DANIEL ZHU

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

DANIEL ZHU, 

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. 2:18-CR-00198 MCE

 

STIPULATION AND ORDER

CONTINUING STATUS CONFERENCE

Date: February 13, 2020

Time: 10:00 a.m..

Court: Hon. Morrison C. England, Jr. 

STIPULATION

Plaintiff United States of America, by and through its counsel of record, 

and defendant, by and through defendant’s counsel of record, hereby stipulate as 

follows: 

1. By previous order, this matter was set for status on February 13, 2020. 

On the Court’s own motion and due to the availability of the Judge, the February 13, 

2020, status conference was vacated and continued to June 25, 2020, at 10:00 a.m.

2. By this stipulation, defendant now moves to exclude time between 

February 13, 2020 and June 25, 2020, under Local Code T4. 

Case 2:18-cr-00198-JAM Document 29 Filed 02/11/20 Page 1 of 3
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3. The parties agree and stipulate, and request that the Court find the 

following: 

a) The discovery associated with this case initially included thousands of 

pages of investigative reports, bank and business records, real estate records, and 

audiovisual material. All of this discovery had been either produced directly to counsel 

and/or made available for inspection and copying. On April 16, 2019, the Court ordered 

this case related with Case Nos. 2:18-cr-134 and 2:18-cr-258. As a result, the

government produced all of the discovery from those related cases to counsel in this 

case. That discovery includes approximately 2,924,548 pages of email records, 

investigative reports, and other items obtained during the investigation. 

b) Counsel for defendant requires additional time to review the charges, 

consult with his client, review this discovery with his client, and otherwise to prepare for 

trial. 

c) Counsel for defendant believes that failure to grant the above-requested 

continuance would deny him/her the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, 

taking into account the exercise of due diligence. 

d) The government does not object to the continuance. 

e) Based on the above-stated findings, the ends of justice served by 

continuing the case as requested outweigh the interest of the public and the defendant in 

a trial within the original date prescribed by the Speedy Trial Act. 

f) For the purpose of computing time under the Speedy Trial Act, 18 

U.S.C. § 3161, et seq., within which trial must commence, the time period February 13, 

2020, and June 25, 2020, inclusive, is deemed excludable pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 

3161(h)(7)(A), B(iv) [Local Code T4] because it results from a continuance granted by 

the Court at defendant’s request on the basis of the Court’s finding that the ends of 

justice served by taking such action outweigh the best interest of the public and the 

defendant in a speedy trial. 

Case 2:18-cr-00198-JAM Document 29 Filed 02/11/20 Page 2 of 3
3

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

4. Nothing in this stipulation and order shall preclude a finding that other 

provisions of the Speedy Trial Act dictate that additional time periods are excludable 

from the period within which a trial must commence.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Dated: February 6, 2020 MCGREGOR W. SCOTT 

United States Attorney 

/s/Roger Yang

ROGER YANG 

Assistant United States Attorney

Dated: February 6, 2020 /s/ David Fischer 

David Fischer Counsel for 

Defendant Daniel Zhu 

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 11, 2020

Case 2:18-cr-00198-JAM Document 29 Filed 02/11/20 Page 3 of 3