Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_13-cv-02356/USCOURTS-caed-2_13-cv-02356-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Daniel Cox
Petitioner
Ronald J. Rackley
Respondent

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DANIEL COX,

Petitioner,

v.

RONALD J. RACKLEY,

Respondent.

No. 2:13-cv-2356 JAM GGH P

ORDER

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with an application for a writ of habeas 

corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Presently pending before the court is respondent’s motion 

to dismiss, filed January 21, 2014. 

Before the court can issue a ruling on the motion, respondent must produce evidence 

supporting his position that petitioner’s 2004 conviction has “fully expired.” See Maleng v. 

Cook, 490 U.S. 488, 491, 109 S. Ct. 1923 (1989). Parole is considered to be “in custody.” Jones 

v. Cunningham, 371 U.S. 236, 240-243, 83 S. Ct. 373 (1963).

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: within fourteen (14) days of this order, 

respondent shall file the evidence as outlined above.

Dated: March 11, 2014

/s/ Gregory G. Hollows

 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

GGH:076/Cox2356.ord

Case 2:13-cv-02356-JAM-GGH Document 21 Filed 03/11/14 Page 1 of 1