Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01654/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01654-6/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
David Bailey
Defendant
Mark Bass
Defendant
City of Chico
Defendant
G.I.S.E.
Plaintiff
Eddie Sanchez
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

30

31

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

30

31

1

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED

ORDER

Roger A. Colvin, Esq. (SBN 68773)

Sharon Medellín (SBN 213798)

ALVAREZ-GLASMAN & COLVIN

Attorneys at Law

13181 Crossroads Parkway North, Suite 400

City of Industry, CA 91746

Tel. (562) 699-5500 · Fax (562) 692-2244

rcolvin@agclawfirm.com smedellin@agclawfirm.com

Attorneys for Defendants City of Chico,

Officer Mark Bass, and Officer David Bailey

Fulvio F. Cajina (SBN 289126)

LAW OFFICES OF FULVIO F. CAJINA

528 Grand Avenue

Oakland, CA 94610

Tel: 510-601-0779/Fax: 510-225-2636

Email: fulvio@cajinalaw.com

Stanley Goff (SBN 289564) 

Law Office Of Stanley Goff 

15 Boardman Place, Suite 2 

San Francisco, CA 94103 

Telephone: (415) 571-9570 

Email: scraiggoff@aol.com

Attorneys for Plaintiff G.I.S.E.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

G. I. S. E. by and through his guardian ad 

litem, EDDIE SANCHEZ, 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

CITY OF CHICO, CHICO POLICE 

DEPARTMENT, MARK BASS, DAVID 

BAILEY, and DOES 1-50, 

 Defendants.

Case No.: 2:22-cv-01654-JDP

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE SCHEDULING 

DEADLINES AND ORDER

///

///

///

Case 2:22-cv-01654-JDP Document 29 Filed 09/24/24 Page 1 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

30

31

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

30

31

2

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER

STIPULATION

Plaintiff G.I.S.E., by and through his guardian ad litem, EDDIE SANCHEZ, and Defendants 

CITY OF CHICO, CHICO POLICE DEPARTMENT, MARK BASS, and DAVID BAILEY (the 

“Chico Defendants”), by and through their respective counsel of record in the above-captioned 

litigation, hereby stipulate and request that the Court enter an order to continue certain case 

management deadlines. 

WHEREAS, the parties were expecting to complete discovery in October 2024 by, among 

other things, completing the depositions of certain percipient witnesses in Chico, California;

WHEREAS, counsel for the Chico Defendants is scheduled to commence trial in the United 

States District Court for the Eastern District of California on October 7, 2024, in the case of the 

Estate of Tyler S. Rushing, et al. v. AG Private Protection, Inc., et al. (U.S.D.C. Case No. 2:18-cv01692-DAD-AC);

WHEREAS, counsel for the Chico Defendants does not have sufficient time to complete 

discovery in this matter by the current deadline of October 11, 2024, due to that federal trial; and

WHEREAS, counsel for both sides believe it makes sense to postpone discovery cutoff and 

related pre-trial dates in this matter due to defense counsel’s trial schedule.

NOW, THEREFORE, the parties respectfully request this Court extend the deadlines in this 

matter as follows: 

Event Current Deadline Proposed Deadline

Discovery Cutoff October 11, 2024 December 20, 2024

Motion to Compel Discovery 

Deadline November 15, 2024 January 24, 2025

Last day to hear dispositive

motion December 18, 2024 February 28, 2025

Good cause exists for continuance of deadlines reflected above as required pursuant to 

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure Rule 16(b)(4) due to defense counsel’s trial schedule, which has 

significantly impacted the parties’ ability to complete discovery. 

Case 2:22-cv-01654-JDP Document 29 Filed 09/24/24 Page 2 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

30

31

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

30

31

3

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER

This is the parties’ fourth request for continuance of case management deadlines. The 

parties do not currently foresee the need for a further continuance in the future.

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

Dated: September 20, 2024 LAW OFFICE OF FULVIO F. CAJINA

By: _ /s/ Fulvio Cajina

FULVIO F. CAJINA

Attorneys for Plaintiff

G.I.S.E.

Dated: September 20, 2024 ALVAREZ-GLASMAN & COLVIN

By: _

Sharon Medellín

Attorneys for Defendants

CITY OF CHICO, et al.

Case 2:22-cv-01654-JDP Document 29 Filed 09/24/24 Page 3 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

30

31

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

30

31

4

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER

PROPOSED ORDER

GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, the parties’ stipulation is GRANTED, as modified below. 

The following deadlines are CONTINUED and RESET as follows:

Event Current Deadline Proposed Deadline

Discovery Cutoff October 11, 2024 December 20, 2024

Motion to Compel Discovery 

Deadline

November 15, 2024 January 23, 2025

Last day to hear dispositive

motion

December 18, 2024 February 27, 2025

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 24, 2024 

JEREMY D. PETERSON

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:22-cv-01654-JDP Document 29 Filed 09/24/24 Page 4 of 4