Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-09-01396/USCOURTS-ca4-09-01396-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Gloria Bautista
Appellant
Clemson University
Appellee

Document Text:

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-1396

GLORIA BAUTISTA,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

CLEMSON UNIVERSITY,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Anderson. Henry F. Floyd, District Judge. 

(8:07-cv-01287-HFF)

Submitted: March 24, 2010 Decided: April 1, 2010

Before WILKINSON and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Melvin Hutson, P.A., Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellant. 

James W. Logan, Jr., LOGAN, JOLLY & SMITH, LLP, Anderson, South 

Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 09-1396 Doc: 21 Filed: 04/01/2010 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Gloria Bautista appeals the district court’s order 

adopting the magistrate judge’s reports and recommendations to 

grant Defendant’s summary judgment motion on her race and 

national origin discrimination claims, brought pursuant to Title 

VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 

§§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (2006). We have reviewed the record and 

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district 

court’s order. Bautista v. Clemson Univ., No. 8:07-cv-01287-HFF 

(D.S.C. Mar. 20, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because 

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before the court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Appeal: 09-1396 Doc: 21 Filed: 04/01/2010 Pg: 2 of 2