Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-02613/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-02613-6/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Frank Nason
Plaintiff
United States of America
Defendant

Document Text:

U

nite

d

States District C

o

u

rt

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

U

nite

d

States District C

o

u

rt

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

FRANK NASON,

Petitioner,

 v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Respondent.

 /

No. C 04-2613 SI

 CR 95-319 SI

CORRECTED ORDER DENYING

PETITIONER’S APPLICATION TO

PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS ON

APPEAL

On January 29, 2007, petitioner filed a notice of appeal of three orders: (1) the November 29,

2006 order denying petitioner’s Rule 60(b) motion; (2) the December 6, 2006 order denying petitioner’s

motion to supplement the unsuccessful Rule 60(b) motion; and (3) Judge Breyer’s January 12, 2007

order denying a motion to disqualify. On January 30, 2007, petitioner filed an application to proceed

in forma pauperis on appeal. 

The Court has reviewed the record and determines that the appeal is not taken in good faith.

Accordingly, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), the Court DENIES the application to proceed in forma

pauperis on appeal. (Docket No. 1544).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 6, 2007 

SUSAN ILLSTON

United States District Judge

Case 3:04-cv-02613-SI Document 9 Filed 02/06/07 Page 1 of 1