Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-02531/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-02531-2/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Robert Bailey Little
Respondent
United States of America
Petitioner

Document Text:

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Petitioner, 

v. 

ROBERT BAILEY LITTLE, 

Respondent. 

No. 2:14-cv-2531-JAM-KJN 

ORDER 

 On December 30, 2014, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations (ECF 

No. 10), which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the 

findings and recommendations were to be filed within ten (10) days. No objections were filed. 

 Accordingly, the court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United 

States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are 

reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 

1983). 

 The court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and, good cause appearing, 

concludes that it is appropriate to adopt the findings and recommendations in full. Accordingly, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 

 1. The findings and recommendations (ECF No. 10) are ADOPTED. 

 2. The Internal Revenue Summons served upon Respondent Robert Bailey Little shall be 

Case 2:14-cv-02531-JAM-KJN Document 12 Filed 02/27/15 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2

enforced in accordance with the terms outlined in the magistrate judge’s findings and 

recommendations. 

 IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: February 26, 2015 

 /s/ John A. Mendez______________________ 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

Case 2:14-cv-02531-JAM-KJN Document 12 Filed 02/27/15 Page 2 of 2