Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-09-08247/USCOURTS-ca4-09-08247-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Terence Dewayne Bullock
Appellant
United States of America
Appellee

Document Text:

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-8247

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

TERENCE DEWAYNE BULLOCK,

Defendant – Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Newport News. Jerome B. Friedman, 

District Judge. (4:00-cr-00060-JBF-1)

Submitted: February 18, 2010 Decided: February 26, 2010

Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Terence Dewayne Bullock, Appellant Pro Se. Timothy Richard 

Murphy, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Newport News, 

Virginia, for Appellee. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 09-8247 Doc: 6 Filed: 02/26/2010 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Terence Dewayne Bullock appeals the district court’s 

order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for 

reduction of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no 

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated 

by the district court. United States v. Bullock, No. 4:00-cr00060-JBF-1 (E.D. Va. Dec. 2, 2009). We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before the court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process. 

AFFIRMED

Appeal: 09-8247 Doc: 6 Filed: 02/26/2010 Pg: 2 of 2