Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-08-06649/USCOURTS-ca4-08-06649-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Vera Etta Baker
Appellant
United States of America
Appellee

Document Text:

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-6649

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

VERA ETTA BAKER,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, District

Judge. (7:06-cr-00034-sgw-2)

Submitted: September 16, 2008 Decided: September 22, 2008

Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Vera Etta Baker, Appellant Pro Se. Ronald Andrew Bassford,

Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 08-6649 Doc: 6 Filed: 09/22/2008 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Vera Etta Baker appeals the district court’s order

denying her motion for a reduction of sentence filed pursuant to 18

U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find

no reversible error. Accordingly, we find the district court did

not abuse its discretion in denying the motion. See United States

v. Goines, 357 F.3d 469, 478 (4th Cir. 2004) (motion under

§ 3582(c) “is subject to the discretion of the district court”);

United States v. Legree, 205 F.3d 724, 727 (4th Cir. 2000). Thus,

we affirm the district court’s order for the reasons stated there.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Appeal: 08-6649 Doc: 6 Filed: 09/22/2008 Pg: 2 of 2