Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-02613/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-02613-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Frank Nason
Plaintiff
United States of America
Defendant

Document Text:

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Respondent,

 v.

FRANK NASON,

Petitioner.

 /

No. C 04-02613 SI

(No. CR 95-0319 SI) 

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO

VACATE SENTENCE PURSUANT TO 28

U.S.C. § 2255

On October 24, 2005, petitioner filed a Notice of Appeal of this Court’s August 22, 2005 Order

Denying Motion to Vacate Sentence Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Petitioner has also filed a Request for

Certificate of Appealability pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c).

The Court denied petitioner’s § 2255 motion because thatmotionwas untimely and petitioner had not

demonstrated “extraordinary circumstances” thatwould have tolled the statute oflimitations. Accordingly, the

Court concludes that petitioner has not “made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right” as

required under 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c), and hereby DENIES the request for a certificate of appealability. The

Clerk shall forward to the Court of Appeals the case file with this order. See United States v. Asrar, 116

F.3d 1268, 1270 (9th Cir. 1997).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: November _7___, 2005

 

SUSAN ILLSTON

United States District Judge

Case 3:04-cv-02613-SI Document 3 Filed 11/08/05 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Case 3:04-cv-02613-SI Document 3 Filed 11/08/05 Page 2 of 2