Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca5-03-40230/USCOURTS-ca5-03-40230-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Elizabeth Loyola-Hernandez
Appellant
United States of America
Appellee

Document Text:

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

February 18, 2004

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 03-40230

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ELIZABETH LOYOLA-HERNANDEZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. L-02-CR-1016-1

--------------------

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, EMILIO M. GARZA, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Elizabeth Loyola-Hernandez pleaded guilty to one count of

illegally transporting an illegal alien for the purpose of

financial gain and was sentenced to 10 months’ confinement. 

Loyola argues that a conflict exists between the district

court’s oral pronouncement of sentence and the written judgment

because the written judgment contains a condition of supervised

release prohibiting the possession of a dangerous weapon, but at

the sentencing hearing, the court did not mention this

 Case: 03-40230 Document: 0051280704 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/18/2004
No. 03-40230

-2-

prohibition. For the reasons outlined in United States v.

Torres-Aguilar, 325 F.3d 934, 935-38 (5th Cir. 2003), we conclude

that the district court’s omission of the dangerous-weapon

prohibition during the oral pronouncement of sentence did not

create a conflict with the sentence set forth in the judgment. 

AFFIRMED.

 Case: 03-40230 Document: 0051280704 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/18/2004