Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-00676/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-00676-16/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
California State Grange
Counter Claimant
National Grange of the Order of Patrons of Husbandry
Counter Defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

----oo0oo----

THE NATIONAL GRANGE OF THE 

ORDER OF PATRONS OF 

HUSBANDRY, a District of 

Columbia nonprofit 

corporation,

Plaintiff,

v.

CALIFORNIA STATE GRANGE d/b/a 

“CSG,” a California 

corporation,

 Defendant.

CIV. NO. 2:14-676 WBS AC

ORDER

----oo0oo----

Plaintiff’s Motion for Clarification of Injunction 

(Docket No. 122) is DENIED. As the court pointed out in its 

Order of September 30, 2015 (Docket No 85), the court’s Order of 

July 14, 2015 (Docket No. 60) granted plaintiff exactly the 

relief it requested. (Docket No. 85) Neither of those orders 

needs clarification. 

This is not what the court contemplated when it denied 

Case 2:14-cv-00676-WBS-DB Document 125 Filed 03/18/16 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

plaintiff’s contempt motion “without prejudice to plaintiff 

making a more specific request for relief.” (Docket No 117). If 

plaintiff wishes to request another injunction, specifically 

enjoining other conduct, it shall do so with a noticed motion in 

compliance with the applicable rules.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 18, 2016

Case 2:14-cv-00676-WBS-DB Document 125 Filed 03/18/16 Page 2 of 2