Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-01302/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-01302-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
HDSP Medical Staff
Defendant
Edward Thomas
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

EDWARD THOMAS,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-07-1302 LEW KJM P

vs.

HDSP MEDICAL STAFF, 

Defendants. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

By order filed July 27, 2007, plaintiff was informed that this court would not treat

his letter as a civil rights complaint and was given thirty days leave to file a complaint and a

request to proceed in forma pauperis. The thirty day period has now expired, and plaintiff has

not filed a complaint or a request to proceed in forma pauperis. He has written several letters to

the court, asking for copies of his original letter or of one of the pages which, he alleges,

contains a list of the defendants in his proposed civil rights action. The letter does not contain a

list of defendants. Moreover, plaintiff has been informed that the court will not make copies of

documents for him, whether or not he is indigent. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed

without prejudice. See Local Rule 11-110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

/////

Case 2:07-cv-01302-LEW -KJM Document 11 Filed 10/09/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty

days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written

objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s

Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the

specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951

F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: October 9, 2007. 

2

thom1712.fta

Case 2:07-cv-01302-LEW -KJM Document 11 Filed 10/09/07 Page 2 of 2