Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_14-cv-01873/USCOURTS-caed-1_14-cv-01873-5/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Bakersfield Police Department
Defendant
City of Bakersfield
Defendant
Ryan Miller
Defendant
Jesse Trevino
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Michael G. Marderosian, No. 77296

Heather S. Cohen, No. 263093

MARDEROSIAN, CERCONE & COHEN

1260 Fulton Mall

Fresno, CA 93721

Telephone: (559) 441-7991

Facsimile: (559) 441-8170

Virginia Gennaro, No. 138877

City Attorney

CITY OF BAKERSFIELD

1501 Truxtun Avenue

Bakersfield, CA 93301

Telephone: (661) 326-3721

Facsimile: (661) 852-2020

Attorneys for: Defendants CITY OF BAKERSFIELD and RYAN MILLER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JESSE TREVINO,

Plaintiff,

vs.

BAKERSFIELD POLICE DEPARTMENT, 

CITY OF BAKERSFIELD, RYAN MILLER,

and DOES 1 to 100, inclusive,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 1:14-CV-01873-JLT

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR 

PHYSICAL EXAMINATION OF 

PLAINTIFF JESSE TREVINO; 

[PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON

(Doc. 28)

STIPULATION

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff Jesse Trevino and defendants City of 

Bakersfield and Ryan Miller (collectively “Defendants”), through their respective attorneys, as follows:

1. The physical condition of the Plaintiff is “in controversy” within the meaning of Federal 

Rule of Civil Procedure 35 (“Rule 35”), which sets forth the procedures for the examination of persons 

whose physical conditions are in controversy.

Case 1:14-cv-01873-JLT Document 29 Filed 09/23/15 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2. Donald R. Huene, M.D., has been retained by Defendants to conduct an examination of the 

Plaintiff pursuant to Rule 35. A copy of Dr. Huene’s curriculum vitae is attached hereto as Exhibit A. 

3. Plaintiff Jesse Trevino will submit to a physical examination to be conducted by Donald R. 

Huene, M.D., on October 15, 2015, at 9 a.m. at 201 N. Valeria Street, Fresno, California.

4. In addition to questioning by Dr. Huene relating to Plaintiff’s complaints, this examination 

shall include a comprehensive physical examination of the wrists. This examination is relevant to Plaintiff’s 

claim of pain, disability and disfigurement.

5. Since the Plaintiff is hearing impaired, the examination will also be attended by a nonhearing impaired observer.

6. The examination will be recorded via audiotape. A copy of the audiotape will be provided 

to defense counsel along with a copy of Dr. Huene’s report.

7. Good cause exists for the Court to enter this Stipulation as an Order of the Court.

8. Nothing herein shall preclude the parties from entering into other stipulations or agreements 

relating to the Rule 35 examinations of Plaintiff.

Dated: September 22, 2015. MARDEROSIAN, CERCONE & COHEN

/s/ Michael G. Marderosian

By:________________________________________

Michael G. Marderosian,

Attorney for Defendants above-named.

Dated: September 22, 2015. RODRIGUEZ & ASSOCIATES

/s/ John Tello

By:_______________________________________

John Tello,

Attorney for Plaintiff

ORDER

The above stipulation is hereby accepted and approved. The terms of the stipulation set forth above 

are hereby adopted as an Order of this Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 23, 2015 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:14-cv-01873-JLT Document 29 Filed 09/23/15 Page 2 of 2