Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-14-07903/USCOURTS-ca4-14-07903-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Antonio Thomas Goode
Appellant
United States of America
Appellee

Document Text:

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-7903

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

ANTONIO THOMAS GOODE,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Florence. Terry L. Wooten, Chief District 

Judge. (4:08-cr-01253-TLW-1; 4:12-cv-02326-TLW)

Submitted: August 13, 2015 Decided: September 21, 2015

Before KING, THACKER, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Antonio Thomas Goode, Appellant Pro Se. Arthur Bradley Parham, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South Carolina;

Stanley D. Ragsdale, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, 

South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 14-7903 Doc: 11 Filed: 09/21/2015 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Antonio Thomas Goode appeals the district court’s order 

denying the second post-judgment motion Goode filed in his 28 

U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) proceeding. On appeal, we confine our 

review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th 

Cir. R. 34(b). Because Goode’s informal brief does not 

challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, Goode 

has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. 

Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Appeal: 14-7903 Doc: 11 Filed: 09/21/2015 Pg: 2 of 2