Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-00424/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-00424-3/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Jane Doe
Plaintiff
Uber Technologies, Inc.
Defendant

Document Text:

Doe v. Uber Technologies, Inc. Stipulation and Proposed Order

Case No. 3:15-cv-00424-(SI) 1

DOUGLAS H. WIGDOR (NY SBN 2609469) 

JEANNE M. CHRISTENSEN (NY SBN 2622124) 

TANVIR H. RAHMAN (NY SBN 4921235) 

ELIZABETH J. CHEN (NY SBN 5126214) 

(Admitted pro hac vice) 

WIGDOR LLP 

85 Fifth Avenue 

New York, NY 10003 

Tel.: (212) 257-6800 

Fax: (212) 257-6845 

ERIC F. YUHL (SBN 102051) 

COLIN A. YUHL (SBN 259196) 

YUHL CARR LLP 

4676 Admiralty Way, Suite 550 

Marina Del Rey, CA 90292 

Tel.: (310) 827-2800 

Fax: (310) 827-4200 

Attorneys for Plaintiff, 

JANE DOE 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

JANE DOE, 

 Plaintiff, 

vs. 

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., 

 

 Defendant. 

Case No.: 3:15-cv-00424(SI) 

 STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER 

It is hereby stipulated, by and between Plaintiff Jane Doe (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant Uber 

Technologies, Inc., (“Uber U.S.”) that: 

1. Uber U.S. consents to extending the time for Plaintiff to file an amended 

complaint pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a), from May 11, 2015 to July 31, 2015; 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Case 3:15-cv-00424-SI Document 49 Filed 05/19/15 Page 1 of 4
Doe v. Uber Technologies, Inc. Stipulation and Proposed Order

Case No. 3:15-cv-00424-(SI) 2

2. The parties respectfully request that the initial case management conference be 

continued from June 19, 2015 to August 7, 2015, or another date amenable to the Court; and 

3. The parties are still discussing their competing views about the propriety of 

discovery at this stage, but agree in the short term that all discovery shall be stayed at least until 

August 7, 2015, or seven days before the date of the initial case management conference, 

whichever is later. Uber U.S. reserves all rights to object to discovery, including but not limited 

to whether Uber U.S. should be required to provide initial disclosures prior to resolution of 

motions to dismiss. 

4. The parties respectfully request that the Court hold in abeyance the briefing 

schedule for Defendant’s pending motions to dismiss (Docket No. 29, 31), to be set by the Court 

at the initial case management conference. 

Dated: May 11, 2015 

 San Francisco, CA 

 Respectfully submitted, 

 WIGDOR LLP 

 

 By: /s/ Jeanne M. Christensen 

 Douglas H. Wigdor 

 Jeanne M. Christensen 

 Tanvir H. Rahman 

 Elizabeth J. Chen 

 85 Fifth Avenue 

 New York, NY 10003 

 Telephone: (212) 257-6800 

 Facsimile: (212) 257-6845 

dwigdor@wigdorlaw.com

jchristensen@wigdorlaw.com 

 trahman@wigdorlaw.com 

echen@wigdorlaw.com 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Case 3:15-cv-00424-SI Document 49 Filed 05/19/15 Page 2 of 4
Doe v. Uber Technologies, Inc. Stipulation and Proposed Order

Case No. 3:15-cv-00424-(SI) 3

YUHL CARR LLP 

Eric F. Yuhl 

Colin A. Yuhl 

 4676 Admiralty Way, Suite 550 

 Marina Del Rey, CA 90292 

 Telephone: (310) 827-2800 

 Facsimile: (310) 827-4200 

 eyuhl@yuhlcarr.com 

 cyuhl@yuhlcarr.com 

 Counsel for Plaintiff 

GIBSON DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP 

 

 By: /s/ Perlette Michèle Jura 

 Michael Li-Ming Wong 

 Perlette Michèle Jura 

 Priyanka Rajagopalan 

 Joseph Tartakovsky 

 555 Mission Street, Suite 3000 

 San Francisco, CA 94105-0921 

 Telephone: (415) 393-8333 

 Facsimile: (415) 374-8434 

mwong@gibsondunn.com

pjura@gibsondunn.com

prajagopalan@gibsondunn.com 

jtartakovsky@gibsondunn.com 

Counsel for Defendant 

Uber Technologies, Inc.

 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Case 3:15-cv-00424-SI Document 49 Filed 05/19/15 Page 3 of 4
Doe v. Uber Technologies, Inc. Stipulation and Proposed Order

Case No. 3:15-cv-00424-(SI) 4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

JANE DOE, 

 Plaintiff, 

vs. 

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., 

 

 Defendant. 

Case No.: 3:15-cv-00424(SI) 

[PROPOSED] ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED that Plaintiff is granted leave 

to serve an Amended Complaint pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(2) in this matter by July 31, 

2015. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the initial case management conference is continued 

from June 18, 2015 to [August 7, 2015] or [_______________]. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that discovery is stayed until August 7, 2015, or until a 

date set by the Court at the initial case management conference. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the briefing schedule on Defendant’s motions to 

dismiss is held in abeyance until the initial case management conference, when the Court will set 

a schedule if necessary. 

Date: May __, 2015 ______________________________ 

 Hon. Susan Illston 

 United States District Court Judge 

 Northern District of California 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

at 2:30 p.m. 19

Case 3:15-cv-00424-SI Document 49 Filed 05/19/15 Page 4 of 4