Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-00227/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-00227-6/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Ryan G. McAfee
Plaintiff
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
Defendant
Peoplesoft Incorporated Long-Term Disability Plan
Defendant

Document Text:

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

g:\docs\shu\dshu2\inbox\signed\05cv227 mcafee stip to cont resp to rmnd ord.docSTIPULATION; [PROPOSED] ORDER Case No. 2:05-CV-00227 

WBS KJM

BARGER & WOLEN LLP 

650 CALIFORNIA STREET 

NINTH FLOOR 

SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94108

(415) 434-2800

Royal F. Oakes (080480) 

Michael A. S. Newman (205299) 

BARGER & WOLEN LLP 

633 West Fifth Street, 47th Floor 

Los Angeles, California 90071 

Telephone: (213) 680-2800 

Facsimile: (213) 614-7399 

Attorneys for Defendants 

METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY 

and PEOPLESOFT INCORPORATED LONG-TERM 

DISABILITY PLAN 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RYAN G. McAFEE, 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE 

COMPANY, and PEOPLESOFT 

INCORPORATED LONG-TERM 

DISABILITY PLAN, 

Defendants. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO. 2:05-CV-00227 WBS-KJM 

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE DATE OF 

RESPONSE TO COURT’S “REMAND 

ORDER”; [PROPOSED] ORDER 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 2:05-cv-00227-WBS -KJM Document 60 Filed 09/28/06 Page 1 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

-2-

g:\docs\shu\dshu2\inbox\signed\05cv227 mcafee stip to cont resp to rmnd ord.docSTIPULATION; [PROPOSED] ORDER Case No. 2:05-CV-00227 

WBS KJM

BARGER & WOLEN LLP 

650 CALIFORNIA STREET 

NINTH FLOOR 

SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94108

(415) 434-2800

STIPULATION

It is hereby stipulated by and between counsel of record for all parties: 

1. On June 20, 2006 the Court in the above-entitled action issued its “Remand Order,” in 

which the Court ordered “that this matter is remanded to Defendant as the insurer/plan administrator 

for a factual determination of the amount Plaintiff is entitled to recover consistent with this Court’s 

order. Defendant is ordered to make this determination within ninety (90) days of this order.” 

2. Defendant’s deadline for complying with the Court’s “Remand Order” was originally 

September 18, 2006. 

3. Defendant requested, and Plaintiff joined in a proposed stipulation, that the Court 

continue the September 18, 2006 deadline 15 days, through and including October 3, 2006. 

Plaintiff joined in the proposed stipulation on the condition, agreed to by Defendant, that Plaintiff 

have the opportunity to respond, if he deems it necessary, to Defendant’s determination described in 

the “Remand Order,” and that Defendant’s determination and Plaintiff’s response, if any, will be 

deemed part of the Administrative Record for review.” The Court granted Defendant’s request on 

September 19, 2006. 

4. Defendant now requests a further continuance of the deadline of ten days to provide 

its determination, through and including October 13, 2006. The parties stipulate that this will be the 

last continuance of the deadline for the determination on remand. The parties further stipulate that 

if Defendant does not comply with the remand order by the extended date, the submissions Plaintiff 

has transmitted to Defendant on remand will be filed with the Court and be deemed part of the 

administrative record for the Court’s review of the monthly long-term disability (“LTD”) benefit 

amount to which Plaintiff is entitled under the Plan. The parties further stipulate that provided 

Defendant issues its determination by the extended date, if that determination is adverse to Plaintiff 

in any way, the parties will take up with the Court any question of whether further administrative 

proceedings are necessary and appropriate. 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 2:05-cv-00227-WBS -KJM Document 60 Filed 09/28/06 Page 2 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

-3-

g:\docs\shu\dshu2\inbox\signed\05cv227 mcafee stip to cont resp to rmnd ord.docSTIPULATION; [PROPOSED] ORDER Case No. 2:05-CV-00227 

WBS KJM

BARGER & WOLEN LLP 

650 CALIFORNIA STREET 

NINTH FLOOR 

SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94108

(415) 434-2800

DATED: September 27, 2006 deVRIES LAW FIRM 

By: /s/ Douglas K. deVries 

DOUGLAS K. deVRIES 

Attorneys for Plaintiff, Ryan G. McAfee 

DATED: September 27, 2006 BARGER & WOLEN LLP 

By: /s/ Royal F. Oakes 

ROYAL F. OAKES 

Attorneys for Defendants 

METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE 

COMPANY and PEOPLESOFT 

INCORPORATED LONG-TERM 

DISABILITY PLAN 

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: September 27, 2006 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 2:05-cv-00227-WBS -KJM Document 60 Filed 09/28/06 Page 3 of 3