Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca11-14-12805/USCOURTS-ca11-14-12805-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Norman V. Charlton
Appellant
United States of America
Appellee

Document Text:

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 14-12805

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D.C. Docket No. 8:13-cr-00505-RAL-EAJ-1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

NORMAN V. CHARLTON, 

 Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Florida

________________________

(March 17, 2015)

Before HULL, JORDAN and BLACK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: 

Robert Godfrey, appointed counsel for Norman Charlton in this direct 

criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of Charlton 

USCA11 Case: 14-12805 Date Filed: 03/17/2015 Page: 1 of 2
2

and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 

18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that 

counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because 

independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, 

counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Charlton’s convictions and 

sentences are AFFIRMED.

USCA11 Case: 14-12805 Date Filed: 03/17/2015 Page: 2 of 2