Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_13-cv-01478/USCOURTS-caed-2_13-cv-01478-2/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Darrell Moore
Plaintiff
Pet Supermarket, Inc.
Defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DARRELL MOORE,

Plaintiff,

v.

PET SUPERMARKET, INC.,

Defendant.

No. 2:13-cv-1478 DAD

ORDER

Each of the parties in the above-captioned case has consented to proceed before a 

United States Magistrate Judge. See U.S.C. § 636(c). Accordingly, this matter has been 

reassigned to the undersigned for all purposes. 

Defendant has filed an answer. Pursuant to the provisions of Rule 16 of the 

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, IT IS ORDERED that:

1. A Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference is set for Friday, December 20, 

2013, at 10:00 a.m., at the United States District Court, 501 I Street, Sacramento, California, in 

Courtroom No. 27, before the undersigned.

2. Each party is required to appear at the Status Conference, either by counsel or, 

if proceeding in propria persona, on his own behalf. Any party may appear at the status 

conference telephonically if the party pre-arranges such appearance by contacting Pete Buzo, the 

courtroom deputy of the undersigned magistrate judge, at (916) 930-4128, no later than 48 hours 

Case 2:13-cv-01478-DAD Document 16 Filed 10/08/13 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

before the Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference; a land line telephone number must be 

provided.

3. Plaintiff shall file and serve a status report on or before December 6, 2013, and 

defendant shall file and serve a status report on or before December 13, 2013. Each party’s 

status report shall address all of the following matters:

a. Progress of service of process;

b. Possible joinder of additional parties;

c. Possible amendment of the pleadings;

d. Jurisdiction and venue;

e. Anticipated motions and the scheduling thereof;

f. Anticipated discovery and the scheduling thereof, including disclosure of 

expert witnesses;

g. Future proceedings, including the setting of appropriate cut-off dates for 

discovery and for law and motion, and the scheduling of a final pretrial 

conference and trial;

h. Modification of standard pretrial procedures specified by the rules due to 

the relative simplicity or complexity of the action;

i. Whether the case is related to any other case, including matters in 

bankruptcy;

j. Whether the parties will stipulate to the magistrate judge assigned to this 

matter acting as settlement judge, waiving any disqualification by virtue of 

his so acting, or whether they prefer to have a Settlement Conference 

before another magistrate judge; and

k. Any other matters that may aid in the just and expeditious disposition of 

this action.

/////

/////

/////

/////

/////

Case 2:13-cv-01478-DAD Document 16 Filed 10/08/13 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3

4. The parties are cautioned that failure to file a status report or failure to appear at 

the status conference may result in an order imposing an appropriate sanction. See Local Rules 

110 and 183.

Dated: October 7, 2013

DAD:6

Ddad\orders.consent\moore1478.ossc.docx

Case 2:13-cv-01478-DAD Document 16 Filed 10/08/13 Page 3 of 3