Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_17-cv-04426/USCOURTS-cand-3_17-cv-04426-13/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Symantec Corporation
Counter-defendant
Zscaler, Inc.
Counter-claimant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING REQUEST 

FOR CLAIM CONSTRUCTION ORDER

CASE NO. 3:17-cv-04426-JST

BAKER 

BOTTS L.L.P.

BAKER BOTTS L.L.P.

Kurt M. Pankratz (SBN 24013291) (Pro Hac Vice) 

kurt.pankratz@bakerbotts.com 

Chad C. Walters (SBN 24034730) (Pro Hac Vice) 

chad.walters@bakerbotts.com 

James Williams (SBN 24075284) (Pro Hac Vice) 

james.williams@bakerbotts.com 

Harrison Rich (SBN 24083730) (Pro Hac Vice) 

harrison.rich@bakerbotts.com 

Clarke Stavinoha (SBN 24093198) (Pro Hac Vice)

clarke.stavinoha@bakerbotts.com 

2001 Ross Avenue, Suite 700 

Dallas, TX 75201 

Tel: (214) 953-6500 

Fax: (214) 953-6503 

Wayne O. Stacy (SBN 341579) 

wayne.stacy@bakerbotts.com 

101 California Street, Suite 3600 

San Francisco, CA 94111 

Tel: (415) 291-6206 

Fax: (415) 291-6306 

Jennifer C. Tempesta (SBN 4397089) (Pro Hac Vice) 

jennifer.tempesta@bakerbotts.com 

30 Rockefeller Plaza 

New York, NY 10112 

Tel: (212) 408-2500 

Fax: (212) 408-2501 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

SYMANTEC CORPORATION 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – SAN FRANCISCO 

SYMANTEC CORPORATION, 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

ZSCALER, INC, 

Defendant. 

Case No. 3:17-CV-04426-JST 

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING 

STIPULATED REQUEST FOR CLAIM 

CONSTRUCTION ORDER PURSUANT TO 

CIVIL LOCAL RULE 7-12 

Judge: Honorable Jon S. Tigar 

Date Filed: December 12, 2016 

Trial Date: Not set

Case 3:17-cv-04426-JST Document 226 Filed 07/31/18 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING REQUEST 

FOR CLAIM CONSTRUCTION ORDER 

2 CASE NO. 3:17-cv-04426-JST

BAKER 

BOTTS L.L.P.

ORDER

 As the parties have stipulated that the claim term “network object” of the ’113 Patent be 

construed as “addressable network device or resource, including servers, workstations, routers, 

firewalls, switches and files stored in memory within those devices or resources,” and the claim 

term “caller’s address” of the ’543 Patent be construed as “memory location of the malicious 

code,” the Court grants the parties’ STIPULATED REQUEST FOR CLAIM CONSTRUCTION 

ORDER. 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: __________________________ __________________________________ 

HON. JON S. TIGAR 

U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE 

July 31, 2018

Case 3:17-cv-04426-JST Document 226 Filed 07/31/18 Page 2 of 2