Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_14-cv-01356/USCOURTS-caed-1_14-cv-01356-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Castel
Defendant
Fernando Moreno
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Plaintiff Fernando Moreno is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action 

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 

On December 3, 2014, Plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed with leave to amend for failure to 

state a cognizable claim for relief, and an amended complaint was due within thirty days. 28 U.S.C. § 

1915A; 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e). Plaintiff has failed to file an amended complaint or otherwise respond to 

the Court’s order. As a result, there is no pleading on file which sets forth any claims upon which 

relief may be granted. 

///

///

///

///

///

FERNANDO MORENO,

 Plaintiff,

v.

CASTEL,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: 1:14-cv-01356-AWI-SAB (PC)

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 

RECOMMENDING DISMISSAL OF ACTION 

FOR FAILURE TO STATE A COGNIZABLE 

CLAIM UPON WHICH RELIEF MAY BE 

GRANTED

[ECF No. 5]

Case 1:14-cv-01356-AWI-SAB Document 7 Filed 01/20/15 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Accordingly, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A and 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e), IT IS HEREBY 

RECOMMENDED that:

1. This action be DISMISSED, with prejudice, based on Plaintiff’s failure to state a claim

upon which relief may be granted under section 1983; and

2. This dismissal be subject to the “three-strikes” provision set forth in 28 U.S.C.§

1915(g). Silva v. Di Vittorio, 658 F.3d 1090, 1098-99 (9th Cir. 2011).

These Findings and Recommendations will be submitted to the United States District Judge 

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of Title 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within thirty (30) days 

after being served with these Findings and Recommendations, Plaintiff may file written objections 

with the Court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and 

Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may 

result in the waiver of rights on appeal. Wilkerson v. Wheeler, 772 F.3d 834, 838-39 (9th Cir. 2014)

(citing Baxter v. Sullivan, 923 F.2d 1391, 1394 (9th Cir. 1991)).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 20, 2015 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:14-cv-01356-AWI-SAB Document 7 Filed 01/20/15 Page 2 of 2