Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-00008/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-00008-3/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Therese Swenson
Plaintiff
United States of America
Defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

THERESE SWENSON, 

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-07-0008 MCE CMK 

vs.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Defendant.

 / ORDER

Defendant recently filed a reply to plaintiff’s April 30, 2007 “Answer in

Opposition to Motion for Summary Judgment.” In the caption of defendant’s reply, defendant

noted that defendant’s motion for summary judgment was set for hearing on May 15, 2007

before the undersigned. For clarification for both parties, the undersigned notes that the hearing

date on defendant’s motion for summary judgment has been vacated. (Doc. 11). The court took

the motion for summary judgment under advisement after plaintiff filed two responses to the

defendant’s motion (March 26, 2007 “Traverse and Demand for Jury Trial” and April 10, 2007

“Answer to Motion for Summary Judgment and Request the Motion be Taken off Calendar...”)

///

///

///

Case 2:07-cv-00008-MCE -CMK Document 20 Filed 05/08/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

The court has construed plaintiff’s April 30, 2007 filing as objections to the

court’s April 20, 2007 findings and recommendations, and the court will construe defendant’s

reply as a response to the objections. 

IT IS ORDERED that the hearing on defendant’s motion for summary judgment

was vacated on April 20, 2007, and it has not been placed back on the calendar. There is no

hearing set in this matter for May 15, 2007.

DATED: May 7, 2007.

______________________________________

CRAIG M. KELLISON

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:07-cv-00008-MCE -CMK Document 20 Filed 05/08/07 Page 2 of 2