Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-15-07366/USCOURTS-ca4-15-07366-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Arthur Laron Niles
Appellant
United States of America
Appellee

Document Text:

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-7366

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

ARTHUR LARON NILES,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Florence. C. Weston Houck, Senior District 

Judge. (4:01-cr-00198-CWH-1)

Submitted: January 26, 2016 Decided: March 16, 2016

Before WYNN, FLOYD, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Arthur Laron Niles, Appellant Pro Se. Alfred William Walker 

Bethea, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South 

Carolina, for Appellee. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 15-7366 Doc: 12 Filed: 03/16/2016 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Arthur Laron Niles appeals the district court’s order 

denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2012) motion and its order 

denying reconsideration.* We have reviewed the record and find 

no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons 

stated by the district court. United States v. Niles, No. 4:01-

cr-00198-CWH-1 (D.S.C. Dec. 28, 2012; Aug. 18, 2015). We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

 * We decline to sua sponte dismiss Niles’ appeal of these 

orders as untimely. Rice v. Rivera, 617 F.3d 802, 810 (4th Cir. 

2010); United States v. Urutyan, 564 F.3d 679, 685 (4th Cir. 

2009); United States v. Mitchell, 518 F.3d 740, 744, 750 (10th 

Cir. 2008).

Appeal: 15-7366 Doc: 12 Filed: 03/16/2016 Pg: 2 of 2