Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-01425/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-01425-2/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Darrell G. Adams
Respondent
Raymond Ochoa
Petitioner

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

U.S. District Court

 E. D. California cd 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RAYMOND OCHOA, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

)

v. )

)

)

DARRELL G. ADAMS, et al., )

)

Respondents. )

 )

1:06-CV-01425 AWI NEW HC 

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND 

RECOMMENDATION [Doc. #12]

ORDER GRANTING RESPONDENT’S

MOTION TO DISMISS AND DISMISSING

PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS

CORPUS [Docs. #1,7]

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT

TO ENTER JUDGMENT 

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. 

On February 27, 2007, the Magistrate Judge issued a Findings and Recommendation that

recommended Respondent’s motion to dismiss the petition be GRANTED and the petition for writ

of habeas corpus be DISMISSED with prejudice for violating the statute of limitations. This

Findings and Recommendation was served on all parties and contained notice that any objections to

the Findings and Recommendation were to be filed within thirty (30) days of the date of service of

the order. Over thirty (30) days have passed and no party has filed objections.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a de

Case 1:06-cv-01425-AWI-LJO Document 13 Filed 04/30/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

U.S. District Court

 E. D. California cd 2

novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds that the Findings

and Recommendation is supported by the record and proper analysis. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendation issued February 27, 2007, is ADOPTED IN FULL; 

2. Respondent’s motion to dismiss the petition is GRANTED; 

3. The petition for writ of habeas corpus is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; and

4. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to enter judgment for Respondent.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 27, 2007 /s/ Anthony W. Ishii 

0m8i78 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-01425-AWI-LJO Document 13 Filed 04/30/07 Page 2 of 2