Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-arwd-6_05-cv-06028/USCOURTS-arwd-6_05-cv-06028-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Martin Marietta Materials, Inc.
Defendant
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Plaintiff

Document Text:

AO72A

(Rev. 8/82)

In its reply, Defendant asks the Court to deem 1

admitted the facts contained in Defendant’s

Statement of Undisputed Material Facts (Doc. 15) as

Plaintiff’s response was untimely. The Court notes

that Plaintiff’s response was not timely filed, but

the Court has considered all of the pleadings and

evidence in connection with this order.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS

HOT SPRINGS DIVISION

UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY PLAINTIFF

V. Civil No. 05-6028

MARTIN MARIETTA MATERIALS, INC. DEFENDANT

O R D E R

On this 2nd day of February 2006, there comes on for

consideration the motion for summary judgment filed by Defendant.

(Doc. #13). Having reviewed the pleadings and the evidence on file

to include the plaintiff’s response and the defendant’s reply , in 1

the light most favorable to the nonmoving party as required, the

court finds that there are issues of fact which preclude summary

judgment. Those issues include, but are not limited to, whether

Defendant breached its duty of ordinary care owed to Gary Long as

an invitee upon Defendant’s premises by failing to maintain the

premises in a reasonably safe condition and whether Defendant’s

actions combined with Plaintiff’s actions to cause Gary Long’s

injuries. 

Therefore, the motion for summary judgment should be and

hereby is DENIED without prejudice to Defendant’s right to renew

Case 6:05-cv-06028-RTD Document 23 Filed 02/02/06 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: <pageID>
AO72A

(Rev. 8/82)

2

the motion at a later date.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

/s/ Robert T. Dawson

Honorable Robert T. Dawson

United States District Judge

Case 6:05-cv-06028-RTD Document 23 Filed 02/02/06 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: <pageID>