Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cr-00167/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cr-00167-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Celia Atkinson
Defendant
USA
Plaintiff

Document Text:

STIPULATION & [PROPOSED] ORDER 

CONTINUING STATUS CONFERENCE

Case No.: CR14-000167 CRB

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

David W. Shapiro (CA Bar No. 219265) 

dshapiro@boerschshapiro.com

BOERSCH SHAPIRO LLP

1611 Telegraph Ave., Suite 806

Oakland, CA 94612

Telephone: (415) 500-6644

Attorney for Defendant

CELIA ATKINSON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

CELIA ATKINSON,

Defendant.

Case No. CR14-000167 CRB

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER CONTINUING STATUS 

CONFERENCE

Defendant CELIA ATKINSON, by her counsel David W. Shapiro, and the United States 

Attorney, by its counsel Special Assistant U.S. Attorney Katherine Lloyd-Lovett, hereby stipulate 

and agree that a status conference be set for January 20, 2016, at 2:00 p.m., or as soon thereafter as 

may be convenient to the Court.

The grounds for this stipulation are as follows:

1. This case is currently scheduled for a status conference on December 23, 2015.

2. The defense and the government have discussed a disposition of diversion for Ms. 

Atkinson. The Pretrial Services office has completed its investigation and recommended diversion to 

the government. The government is now reviewing that recommendation and needs additional time 

beyond the current scheduled court date of December 23, 2015.

3. The parties have agreed that a continuance to January 20, 2016 is reasonable, and the 

Court is available on that date.

Case 3:14-cr-00167-CRB Document 54 Filed 12/22/15 Page 1 of 3
2 STIPULATION & [PROPOSED] ORDER 

CONTINUING STATUS CONFERENCE

Case No.: CR14-000167 CRB

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

4. The parties request that the Court exclude time between December 23, 2015 and 

January 20, 2016 from the calculation of time under the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C.§ 3161, to allow 

for the effective preparation of counsel for possible diversion. The parties agree that the ends of 

justice in granting the continuance and excluding time outweigh the best interest of the public and the 

defendant in a speedy trial. 

5. Special AUSA Katherine Lloyd-Lovett has consented to the continuance and to the 

exclusion of time under the Speedy Trial Act, and to the inclusion of her signature on this stipulation.

Dated: December 21, 2015 /s/ David W. Shapiro 

DAVID W. SHAPIRO

Attorney for Defendant Celia Atkinson

/s/ Katherine Lloyd-Lovett _______

KATHERINE LLOYD-LOVETT 

Special Assistant U.S. Attorney

Case 3:14-cr-00167-CRB Document 54 Filed 12/22/15 Page 2 of 3
ORDER CONTINUING STATUS 

CONFERENCE

Case No.: CR14-000167 CRB

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

CELIA ATKINSON,

Defendant.

Case No. CR14-000167 CRB

[PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING 

STATUS CONFERENCE 

Based on the stipulation between the parties in this case, IT IS ORDERED that a status 

conference in this case is set for January 20, 2016 at 2:00 p.m. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the time period between December 23, 2015 and January 

20, 2016 is excluded in computing the time within which the trial must commence, pursuant to 18 

U.S.C. §§ 3161(h)(7)(A) and (h)(7)(B)(i) and (iv).

IT IS SO ORDERED:

Dated: December ___, 2015 ___________________________________

HONORABLE CHARLES R. BREYER

United States Senior District Judge

21st

Case 3:14-cr-00167-CRB Document 54 Filed 12/22/15 Page 3 of 3