Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-06556/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-06556-7/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
City Of Fresno
Defendant
Holly Louen
Plaintiff
Brian Twedt
Defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

HOLLY LOUEN, ) 

 )

Plaintiff, )

)

vs. )

)

FRESNO POLICE OFFICER BRIAN )

TWEDT; THE CITY OF FRESNO, )

CALIFORNIA, )

 )

Defendants. )

)

) 

No. CV-F-04-6556 REC SMS

ORDER CONTINUING ORAL

ARGUMENT ON PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION

TO APRIL 17, 2006.

By e-mail, Plaintiff’s counsel notified the Court that he is

unable to attend oral argument on Plaintiff’s Motion for

Reconsideration (Doc. 69), scheduled for March 27, 2006. Counsel

for Defendants City of Fresno and Brian Twedt stated in e-mails

to the Court that they oppose continuance.

Oral argument on another motion in this case, Plaintiff’s

Motion for Abstention Pending Resolution of Parallel State Court

Action (Doc. 85), is currently scheduled for April 17, 2006, at

1:30 p.m. 

Accordingly, in the interest of judicial economy and to

Case 1:04-cv-06556-OWW -SMS Document 87 Filed 03/23/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

accommodate Plaintiff’s counsel’s request, oral argument on

Plaintiff’s Motion for Reconsideration shall be continued to

April 17, 2006, at 1:30 p.m.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 23, 2006 /s/ Robert E. Coyle 

810ha4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:04-cv-06556-OWW -SMS Document 87 Filed 03/23/06 Page 2 of 2