Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-01053/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-01053-3/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Robert L. King
Petitioner
Paul Schultz
Respondent

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ROBERT L. KING,

Petitioner,

v.

PAUL SCHULTZ, Warden,

Respondent.

 /

CV F 05-1053 OWW DLB HC

ORDER DENYING PETITIONER’S MOTION

FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT AND DIRECTING

CLERK OF COURT TO RE-SERVE COURT’S

NOVEMBER 16, 2005, ORDER TO RESPOND

[Docs. 5, 7, 9]

Petitioner is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. 

Petitioner filed the instant petition for writ of habeas corpus on August 17, 2005. On

November 16, 2005, the Court directed Respondent to file a response to the petition. (Court

Doc. 5.) On March 24, 2006, Petitioner filed a motion for default judgment. (Court Doc. 6.) On

March 27, 2006, the Court directed the Clerk of Court to re-serve the Court’s November 16,

2005, order on Respondent’s representative as it was not properly served, and the Court denied

Petitioner’s request for entry of default. (Court Doc. 7.) Although the Court’s order of

November 16, 2005, was re-served on March 27, 2006, it was unfortunately served on the wrong

representative. (Court Doc. 8.) Therefore, it is regretful to say that Respondent has yet to receive

notice of this action. As such, Petitioner’s motion for entry of default must be denied, and the

Court will again direct the Clerk of Court to re-serve the Court’s November 16, 2005, order to

respond.

Case 1:05-cv-01053-OWW -DLB Document 10 Filed 07/18/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Based on the foregoing, it is HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Clerk of Court is directed to serve a copy of November 16, 2005, order on

Respondent’s representatives; and

2. Petitioner’s motion for entry of default is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: July 17, 2006 /s/ Dennis L. Beck 

3b142a UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:05-cv-01053-OWW -DLB Document 10 Filed 07/18/06 Page 2 of 2