Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_11-cv-03023/USCOURTS-caed-2_11-cv-03023-4/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
John Navy Novikoff
Plaintiff
United States
Defendant

Document Text:

Stipulation Setting Summary Judgment Briefing Schedule 1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOHN NAVY NOVIKOFF

Plaintiff,

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Defendant.

CASE NO. 2:11-CV-03023-MCE -EFB

STIPULATION AND ORDER SETTING 

BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR 

DEFEDNANT’S MOTION FOR 

SUMMARY JUDGMENT

[Local Rule 143]

WHEREAS, this Court’s Scheduling Order [Dkt. No. 11] requires any motion for summary 

judgment to be filed 8 weeks before a hearing, the opposition and any cross-motion to be filed 5 

weeks before a hearing, the opposition to any cross-motion and reply regarding the motion to be 

filed 3 weeks before a hearing; and any reply regarding the cross-motion to be filed one week before 

the hearing date;

WHEREAS, Defendant wishes to file a motion for summary judgment on an issue on which 

Plaintiff does not wish to cross-move;

WHEREAS, the parties have a fundamental disagreement on this issue underlying 

Defendant’s proposed summary judgment motion, which could be dispositive of the case;

WHEREAS, an order from the Court deciding Defendant’s motion is likely to aid in 

resolution of this case;

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

GREGORY T. BRODERICK

Assistant United States Attorneys

501 I Street, Suite 10-100

Sacramento, CA 95814

Telephone: (916) 554-2700

Facsimile: (916) 554-2900 

Attorneys for Defendant

United States of America

Case 2:11-cv-03023-MCE-EFB Document 35 Filed 07/23/13 Page 1 of 2
Stipulation Setting Summary Judgment Briefing Schedule 2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

NOW WHEREFORE, THE PARTIES HEREBY STIPULATE AS FOLLOWS:

That Defendant’s motion for summary judgment shall be calendared for hearing on August 

22, 2013;1

That Defendant’s motion be briefed on the following schedule:

• Defendant’s Motion and supporting papers: July 18, 2013

• Plaintiff’s Opposition: August 8, 2013;

• Defendant’s Reply: August 15, 2013.

Nothing herein is intended to prohibit any party from filing any such motion according to the 

schedule set forth in the operative Scheduling Order.

Respectfully Submitted,

DATED: July 5, 2013 BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

By: /s/ Gregory T. Broderick

GREGORY T. BRODERICK Assistant United States Attorney

DATED: July 5, 2013 /s/ Joseph E. Maloney

Attorney for Plaintiff 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 18, 2013

 1 The parties recognize that the Court retains the discretion to submit this matter without argument, 

or to continue the hearing to another date.

Case 2:11-cv-03023-MCE-EFB Document 35 Filed 07/23/13 Page 2 of 2