Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_09-cv-02529/USCOURTS-caed-2_09-cv-02529-2/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Vincent C. Ortiz
Petitioner
James Yates
Respondent

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

VINCENT C. ORTIZ,

Petitioner, No. CIV-S-09-2529 GGH P

vs.

JAMES YATES, et al., 

Respondent. ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

 /

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for a writ of habeas

corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. By order filed September 21, 2009, respondent was

ordered to file, within sixty day, an answer to the instant petition or a motion to dismiss.

Respondent has not filed an answer to the petition or a motion to dismiss. Good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that within seven days from the date of this order respondent shall

file and serve an answer to the petition for writ of habeas corpus or a motion to dismiss and shall 

\\\\\

\\\\\

\\\\\

\\\\\

\\\\\

Case 2:09-cv-02529-GEB-GGH Document 11 Filed 01/19/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

show cause in writing why sanctions should not be imposed for the failure to file a timely answer

or motion to dismiss.

DATED: January 19, 2010

 /s/ Gregory G. Hollows

 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

GGH:035

orti2529.osc

Case 2:09-cv-02529-GEB-GGH Document 11 Filed 01/19/10 Page 2 of 2