Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_18-cv-07005/USCOURTS-cand-3_18-cv-07005-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Jalaluddin Achakzai
Plaintiff
Nancy A Berryhill
Defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JALALUDDIN ACHAKZAI,

Plaintiff,

v.

NANCY A BERRYHILL,

Defendant.

Case No. 18-cv-07005-JCS 

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY 

REPLY BRIEF SHOULD NOT BE 

STRICKEN

Re: Dkt. No. 17

This action for review of an adverse decision by the Social Security Administration is 

governed by Civil Local Rule 16-5. Under that rule, a plaintiff’s reply brief is due fourteen days 

after service of the defendant’s cross-motion for summary judgment. The cross-motion in this 

case was filed and electronically served on May 9, 2019. Plaintiff Jalaluddin Achakzai’s reply 

brief was therefore due May 23, 2019, but was not filed until May 31, 2019. The reply includes 

no explanation for the delay. Achakzai is therefore ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why the reply 

should not be stricken and disregarded, by filing a response to this order no later than June 10, 

2019.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 3, 2019

______________________________________

JOSEPH C. SPERO

Chief Magistrate Judge

Case 3:18-cv-07005-JCS Document 18 Filed 06/03/19 Page 1 of 1