Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-06650/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-06650-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Raymond Andrews
Respondent
Cash Braidy Knott
Petitioner

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

U.S . District Court

 E. D . California cd 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CASH BRAIDY KNOTT, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

)

v. )

)

)

RAYMOND ANDREWS, Warden, )

)

Respondent. )

 )

CV F 04 6650 AWI LJO HC 

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND 

RECOMMENDATION 

[Doc. #5]

ORDER DISMISSING PETITION FOR WRIT

OF HABEAS CORPUS

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT

TO ENTER JUDGMENT 

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. 

On March 10, 2005, the Magistrate Judge issued a Findings and Recommendation that the 

petition for writ of habeas corpus be DISMISSED for failure to prosecute. This Findings and

Recommendation was served on all parties and contained notice that any objections to the Findings

and Recommendation were to be filed within thirty (30) days of the date of service of the order. 

Over thirty (30) days have passed and no party has filed objections. The Court notes that the

Findings and Recommendation were returned by the U.S. Postal Service on March 21, 2005, as

Case 1:04-cv-06650-AWI-LJO Document 7 Filed 04/26/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 1

 Service at the last address provided by Petitioner is sufficient. See Local Rule 83-183.

U.S . District Court

 E. D . California cd 2

undeliverable.1

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a de

novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds that the Findings

and Recommendation is supported by the record and proper analysis. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendation issued March 10, 2005, is ADOPTED IN FULL; 

2. The petition for writ of habeas corpus is DISMISSED; and

3. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to enter judgment.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 26, 2005 /s/ Anthony W. Ishii 

0m8i78 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:04-cv-06650-AWI-LJO Document 7 Filed 04/26/05 Page 2 of 2