Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-06768/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-06768-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
John Albert Daniel
Petitioner
Paul M. Shultz
Respondent

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOHN ALBERT DANIEL, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

v. )

)

)

WARDEN PAUL M. SHULTZ, )

)

Respondent. )

)

___________________________________ )

CV F 04-6768 AWI WMW HC

ORDER ADOPTING

FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS 

[Doc. 5]

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas

corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. 

On June 10, 2005, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations herein. 

These findings and recommendations were served on the parties and contained notice to the

parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within thirty

days. No objections have been filed.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)C) this court has

conducted a de novo review of this case. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708

Case 1:04-cv-06768-AWI-WMW Document 6 Filed 09/15/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 2

F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the

findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis. The

court notes in particular that although Petitioner’s copy of the order of February 23, 2005, has

been returned by the United States Postal Service, it was served on Petitioner at his address of

record and such service is fully effective under Local Rule 83-182(f).

Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations issued by the Magistrate Judge on 

June 10, 2005, are ADOPTED IN FULL; 

2. This petition is dismissed for failure to obey a court order;

3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment for Respondent and to close this

case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 14, 2005 /s/ Anthony W. Ishii 

0m8i78 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:04-cv-06768-AWI-WMW Document 6 Filed 09/15/05 Page 2 of 2