Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_23-cv-00346/USCOURTS-caed-2_23-cv-00346-4/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Michael E. Jacques
Plaintiff
R. Weiss
Defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MICHAEL E. JACQUES,

Plaintiff,

v.

R. WEISS, et al.,

Defendants.

No. 2:23-cv-0346-SCR P

ORDER AND FINDINGS & 

RECOMMENDATIONS

By order filed July 15, 2024, plaintiff was granted an extension of time of 60 days to file a

second amended complaint pursuant to the court’s order of May 21, 2024. That time period

expired, and plaintiff did not file a second amended complaint or otherwise respond to the court’s 

order. On October 31, 2024, the court gave plaintiff one more opportunity to file a second 

amended complaint or otherwise respond to the court’s order and warned plaintiff that failure to 

do so would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. That time too has expired 

and plaintiff has not filed a second amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court’s most 

recent order.

For the reasons set forth above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court 

shall assign a district judge to this case; and

////

Case 2:23-cv-00346-TLN-SCR Document 18 Filed 11/25/24 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

IT IS RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice for failure to 

state a cognizable claim, for reasons provided in the court’s order of May 21, 2024, which are 

incorporated herein; for failure to prosecute; and for failure to follow the court’s order. See Local 

Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within 21 days after 

being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with 

the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned “Objections to 

Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file 

objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. 

Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 

Dated: November 22, 2024

Case 2:23-cv-00346-TLN-SCR Document 18 Filed 11/25/24 Page 2 of 2