Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-09-02358/USCOURTS-ca4-09-02358-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools
Appellee
Dequilla Walker
Appellant

Document Text:

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-2358

DEQUILLA WALKER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

CHARLOTTE-MECKLENBURG SCHOOLS,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert J. Conrad, 

Jr., Chief District Judge. (3:09-cv-00035-RJC-DCK)

Submitted: February 10, 2010 Decided: February 22, 2010

Before GREGORY and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Dequilla Walker, Appellant Pro Se. Mary H. Crosby, Keith 

Michael Weddington, PARKER, POE, ADAMS & BERNSTEIN, LLP, 

Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 09-2358 Doc: 11 Filed: 02/22/2010 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Dequilla Walker appeals a district court order and 

judgment dismissing her complaint against the CharlotteMecklenburg Schools. We have reviewed the record and the 

opinion and affirm for the reasons cited by the district court. 

See Walker v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools, No. 3:09-cv-00035-

RJC-DCK (W.D.N.C. Nov. 9, 2009). We also find the magistrate 

judge did not abuse his discretion in denying Walker’s motion to 

amend the complaint. We dispense with oral argument because the 

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before the court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Appeal: 09-2358 Doc: 11 Filed: 02/22/2010 Pg: 2 of 2