Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca10-15-04065/USCOURTS-ca10-15-04065-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Ector M. Medina
Appellant
Union Pacific R.R.
Appellee

Document Text:

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

_________________________________

ECTOR M. MEDINA, 

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

UNION PACIFIC R.R., 

 Defendant - Appellee.

No. 15-4065

(D.C. No. 2:14-CV-00216-CW-BCW)

(D. Utah)

_________________________________

ORDER

_________________________________

Before HOLMES, PHILLIPS, and MORITZ, Circuit Judges.

_________________________________

This is an appeal from a non-final order issued by the magistrate judge denying the 

plaintiff’s motion for extension of time. We dismiss for lack of appellate jurisdiction.

The magistrate’s decision is not directly appealable to this court. Except for 

proceedings conducted by the magistrate judge on consent of the parties pursuant to 28 

U.S.C. § 636(c), a court of appeals lacks jurisdiction to hear an appeal taken directly from 

a decision of a magistrate judge. See Colorado Building & Construction Trade Council v. 

B.B. Andersen Construction Co., 879 F.2d 809 (10th Cir. 1989). 

APPEAL DISMISSED. 

Entered for the Court

ELISABETH A. SHUMAKER, Clerk

by: Ellen Rich Reiter

 Jurisdictional Attorney

FILED

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

June 12, 2015

Elisabeth A. Shumaker

Clerk of Court

Appellate Case: 15-4065 Document: 01019443949 Date Filed: 06/12/2015 Page: 1