Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_10-cv-01017/USCOURTS-azd-2_10-cv-01017-2/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
James Baird
Defendant
Kelly Bologna
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Kelly Bologna, 

Plaintiff, 

vs.

James Baird, 

Defendant. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV10-1017-PHX-NVW-MEA

ORDER

Pending before the Court is the Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) of Magistrate

Judge Aspey (doc. 9) regarding Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint (doc. 7). The R&R

recommends that the Amended Complaint be dismissed without prejudice.

Because the parties did not file objections, the court need not review any of the 

Magistrate Judge’s determinations on dispositive matters. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1);

Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003);

Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985) (“[Section 636(b)(1)] does not . . . require any

review at all . . . of any issue that is not the subject of an objection.”).

Notwithstanding the absence of an objection, the court has reviewed the R&R and

finds that it is well taken. The court will accept the R&R and dismiss the action. See 28

U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (stating that the district court “may accept, reject, or modify, in whole

or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate”).

Case 2:10-cv-01017-NVW Document 16 Filed 11/22/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of the

Magistrate Judge (doc. #9) is accepted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Amended Complaint (doc. 7) is dismissed

without prejudice. This action will proceed on the Complaint (doc. 1).

DATED this 22nd day of November, 2010.

Case 2:10-cv-01017-NVW Document 16 Filed 11/22/10 Page 2 of 2