Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-00598/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-00598-2/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Butte County
Defendant
Tom Fisher
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-1-

PAUL L. REIN, Esq. (SBN 43053)

PATRICIA BARBOSA, Esq. (SBN 125865)

JULIE MCLEAN, Esq. (SBN 215202)

LAW OFFICES OF PAUL L. REIN

200 Lakeside Dr., Suite A

Oakland, CA 94612

(510) 832-5001

Attorneys for Plaintiff:

TOM FISHER

STEPHEN E. HORAN, Esq. (SBN 125241)

NATHAN W. AUSTIN, Esq. (SBN 219672)

PORTER, SCOTT, WEIBERG & DELEHANT

350 University Ave., Suite 200

Sacramento, CA 95825

(916) 929-1481

(916) 927-3706 (fax) 

Office of County Counsel, County of Butte

Bruce S. Alpert

25 County Center Drive

Oroville, CA 95965-3380

(530) 538-7621

(530) 538-6891 (fax)

Attorneys for Defendant

BUTTE COUNTY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TOM FISHER,

Plaintiff,

v.

BUTTE COUNTY; BUTTE COUNTY

COURTHOUSE; SUPERIOR COURT OF

CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF BUTTE;

and DOES 1 through 20,

Inclusive,

Defendants.

CASE NO. 2:05-CV-00598-WBS-KJM

 AND 2:05-CV-00600-WBS-KJM

Civil Rights

STIPULATION FOR ONE-DAY

EXTENSION OF BRIEFING SCHEDULE

ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR

ATTORNEY FEES, LITIGATION

EXPENSES AND COSTS

Hearing

Date: December 11, 2006

Time: 1:30 p.m.

Place: U.S. District Court

501 I St.

Sacramento, CA

Judge: Hon. William B. Shubb

Courtroom 5

Case 2:05-cv-00598-WBS -KJM Document 36 Filed 11/27/06 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-2-

IT IS STIPULATED by and among Plaintiff, TOM FISHER,

and Defendant, BUTTE COUNTY, that at plaintiff’s request, and

with defendant’s agreement, there be a one-day extension to the

dates for defendant’s opposition and plaintiff’s reply on

plaintiff’s motion for attorney fees, as follows. 

1. On October 25, 2006, plaintiff filed his motion for

attorney fees, litigation expenses, and costs, pursuant to the

Court Order signed on June 27, 2006.

2. Plaintiff set the hearing for the next available

hearing date; however, plaintiff miscalculated in choosing 

this hearing date, not realizing that this would make

defendants’ opposition brief due immediately after the

Thanksgiving holiday, and his own reply brief due the day 

after his lead counsel Paul Rein, who has sole responsibility

for the attorney fee motion, returns from a ten-day out-ofstate trip.

3. No previous extensions of time have been requested,

and the requested one-day continuance would not prejudice any

party.

Therefore, the parties agree and stipulate, subject

to the approval of this Court, that the deadline for

defendant’s Opposition to plaintiff’s motion will be extended

from November 27, 2006, to November 28, 2006, and the deadline

for plaintiff’s Reply will be extended from December 4, 2006 

to December 5, 2006.

//

//

/ /

Case 2:05-cv-00598-WBS -KJM Document 36 Filed 11/27/06 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-3-

Dated: November 21, 2006 PAUL L. REIN

PATRICIA BARBOSA

JULIE MCLEAN

/s/ 

Attorneys for Plaintiff

TOM FISHER

Dated: November 21, 2006 STEPHEN E. HORAN

NATHAN W. AUSTIN

/s/ 

Attorneys for Defendant

BUTTE COUNTY

ORDER

Pursuant to stipulation, and for good cause shown, IT IS

SO ORDERED. Defendant’s Opposition to plaintiff’s motion for

attorney fees shall be due on or before November 28, 2006, and

plaintiff’s Reply shall be due on or before December 5, 2006.

The hearing date of December 11, 2006 shall remain unchanged.

Dated: November 22, 2006

Case 2:05-cv-00598-WBS -KJM Document 36 Filed 11/27/06 Page 3 of 3