Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-02787/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-02787-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Axiom Design Automation, Inc.
Counter-claimant
Dynetix Design Solutions, Inc.
Counter-defendant

Document Text:

FENWICK 

&

WEST LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN FRANCISCO

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING 

DEADLINE TO FILE AMENDED 

PLEADINGS 

CASE NO. C-06-02787-CRB 

DARRYL M. WOO (CSB NO. 100513) 

 dwoo@fenwick.com

BRYAN A. KOHM (CSB NO. 233276) 

 bkohm@fenwick.com

FENWICK & WEST LLP 

275 Battery Street, 16th Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94111 

Telephone: (415) 875-2400 

Facsimile: (415) 281-1350 

Attorneys for Defendant 

AXIOM DESIGN AUTOMATION, INC. 

James Cai (California State Bar No. 200189) 

Daniel Schein, Ph. D. (California State Bar No. 196595) 

Douglas Mackenzie (California State Bar No. 212953) 

SCHEIN & CAI LLP 

100 Century Center Court, Suite 315 

San Jose, California 95112 

Telephone: (408) 436-0789 

Facsimile: (408) 436-0758 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

DYNETIX DESIGN SOLUTIONS, INC 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

DYNETIX DESIGN SOLUTIONS, INC., 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

AXIOM DESIGN AUTOMATION, INC., 

Defendant. 

Case No. C-06-02787-CRB 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER CONTINUING DEADLINE TO 

FILE AMENDED PLEADINGS 

Date of Filing: April 24, 2006 

Trial Date: None set 

Case 3:06-cv-02787-CRB Document 20 Filed 10/10/06 Page 1 of 3
FENWICK 

&

WEST LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN FRANCISCO

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING 

DEADLINE TO FILE AMENDED 

PLEADINGS 

2 CASE NO. C-06-02787-CRB 

WHEREAS, Plaintiff Dynetix Design Solutions, Inc. (“Dynetix”) filed a Complaint for 

Patent Infringement on or about April 24, 2006, against Defendant AXIOM Design Automation, 

Inc. (“AXIOM”); 

WHEREAS, Plaintiff served Defendant with the Complaint on or about August 11, 2006; 

WHEREAS, Defendant filed an Answer and Counterclaims on or about August 31, 2006; 

WHEREAS, the parties have agreed to mediate the dispute and mediation is scheduled 

for October 24, 2006; 

WHEREAS, AXIOM intends to file amended counterclaims adding additional parties and 

claims relating to events that occurred after its original counterclaims were filed; 

WHEREAS, Dynetix anticipates filing an amended complaint naming additional parties; 

WHEREAS, the deadline to file amended pleadings naming additional parties is currently 

set for October 5, 2006; 

WHEREAS, the parties agree that mediation and settlement discussions would be 

facilitated by AXIOM and Dynetix waiting until after mediation to file their amended 

counterclaims and complaint, respectively; 

WHEREAS, in the event that the parties are unable to resolve this dispute through 

mediation, the parties agree to stipulate to leave of court for each opposing party to file their 

respective amended counterclaims and complaint after mediation; 

WHEREAS, the parties agree to extend the deadline until November 1, 2006 to file their 

respective amended counterclaims and complaint naming additional parties and adding additional 

claims, if any; 

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the parties, through 

their respective attorneys of record, as follows: 

1. The deadline to file amended pleadings naming additional parties shall be 

continued from October 5, 2006 to November 1, 2006; 

2. In the event that mediation is not successful, Dynetix shall stipulate to leave of 

court for AXIOM to file amended counterclaims naming additional parties and adding claims; 

3. In the event that mediation is not successful, AXIOM shall stipulate to leave of 

Case 3:06-cv-02787-CRB Document 20 Filed 10/10/06 Page 2 of 3
FENWICK 

&

WEST LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN FRANCISCO

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING 

DEADLINE TO FILE AMENDED 

PLEADINGS 

3 CASE NO. C-06-02787-CRB 

court for Dynetix to file an amended complaint naming additional parties. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

 FENWICK & WEST LLP 

Date: October 5, 2006 By: /s/ Bryan A. Kohm 

Bryan A. Kohm 

ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT 

AXIOM DESIGN AUTOMATION, INC. 

 

 SCHEIN & CAI LLP 

Date: October 5, 2006 By: /s/ James Cai 

James Cai 

ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF 

DYNETIX DESIGN SOLUTIONS, INC. 

GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: October __, 2006 

By: _______________________________________ 

 The Honorable Judge Charles R. Breyer 

06

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Charles R. Breyer

Case 3:06-cv-02787-CRB Document 20 Filed 10/10/06 Page 3 of 3