Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-10-04645/USCOURTS-ca4-10-04645-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Julius Nesbitt
Appellant
United States of America
Appellee

Document Text:

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-4645

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

JULIUS NESBITT, a/k/a Butch,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Charleston. David C. Norton, Chief District 

Judge. (2:08-cr-01153-DCN-1)

Submitted: July 29, 2010 Decided: July 30, 2010

Before DUNCAN, DAVIS, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Louis H. Lang, CALLISON, TIGHE & ROBINSON, LLC, Columbia, South 

Carolina, for Appellant. Peter Thomas Phillips, Assistant 

United States Attorney, Charleston, South Carolina, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 10-4645 Doc: 17 Filed: 07/30/2010 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Julius Nesbitt seeks to appeal the district court’s 

order denying his motion for reconsideration of its denial of 

his suppression motion and motion for a hearing pursuant to 

Franks v. Delaware, 438 U.S. 154 (1978). This court may 

exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 

(2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 

U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial 

Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The order 

Nesbitt seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an 

appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we 

dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with 

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before the court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Appeal: 10-4645 Doc: 17 Filed: 07/30/2010 Pg: 2 of 2