Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_19-cv-01872/USCOURTS-caed-2_19-cv-01872-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Howard Herships
Plaintiff
Gavin Newsom
Defendant

Document Text:

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

HOWARD HERSHIPS, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

GAVIN NEWSOM, 

Defendant. 

No. 2:19-cv-01872 KJM AC (PS) 

ORDER 

 Plaintiff is proceeding in this action in pro per in forma pauperis. The matter was referred 

to a United States Magistrate Judge as provided by Local Rule 302(c)(21). 

 On October 21, 2019, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which 

were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings 

and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. ECF No. 8. Plaintiff has filed 

objections to the findings and recommendations. ECF No. 9. 

 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this 

court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having reviewed the file, the court finds the 

findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the proper analysis. 

 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 

1. The findings and recommendations filed October 21, 2019, are adopted in full; 

///// 

Case 2:19-cv-01872-KJM-AC Document 11 Filed 02/14/20 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2 

 2. The complaint, ECF No. 1, is DISMISSED with prejudice under 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2); 

 3. The motion for a preliminary injunction, ECF No. 4, is DENIED as MOOT; and 

 4. The Clerk of Court close this case. 

DATED: February 12, 2020. 

Case 2:19-cv-01872-KJM-AC Document 11 Filed 02/14/20 Page 2 of 2