Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_13-cr-00228/USCOURTS-caed-2_13-cr-00228-8/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
USA
Plaintiff
Ruth Willis
Defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

CANDACE A. FRY

CA Bar No. 68910

2401 Capitol Avenue

Sacramento, CA 95816

Telephone: 916.446.9322

FAX: 916.446.0770

E mail: c.fry@att.net

Attorney for RUTH WILLIS,

Defendant

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

RUTH WILLIS,

Defendants.

 No. 2:13-CR-000228-MCE

STIPULATION REGARDING EXCLUDABLE 

TIME PERIODS UNDER SPEEDY TRIAL 

ACT; ORDER

It is hereby stipulated and agreed by and between the parties hereto, through 

their respective counsel, as follows:

1. By previous order, this matter was set for status on June 20, 2014.

2. By this stipulation, the defendant now moves to continue the status 

conference until August 21, 2014, and to exclude time between June 20, 

2014, and August 21, 2014, under Local Code T4. 

3. The parties agree and stipulate and request that the Court find the following:

a) The Government has represented that discovery associated with this case 

consists of documents Bates numbered 0001 to 6719. All of this discovery 

has been produced directly to counsel for the defendant.

 ///

Case 2:13-cr-00228-MCE Document 29 Filed 06/24/14 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

b) Counsel for defendant desires additional time to discuss potential 

resolutions with the Government and the client and/or to prepare for trial. 

Counsel for defendant believes that failure to grant the above-requested 

continuance would deny the reasonable time necessary for effective 

preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence.

c) The Government does not object to the continuance.

d) Based on the above-stated findings, the ends of justice served by 

continuing the case as requested outweigh the interest of the public and 

the defendant in a trial within the original date prescribed by the Speedy 

Trial Act.

e) For the purpose of computing time under the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C.

Section 3161, et seq., within which trial must commence, the time period of 

June 20, 2014, to August 21, 2014, inclusive, is deemed excludable 

pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 3161(h)(7)(A), B(iv) (Local Code T4) 

because it results from a continuance granted by the Court at defendant’s

request on the basis of the Court’s finding that the ends of justice served 

by taking such action outweigh the best interest of the public and the 

defendant in a speedy trial.

///

///

///

///

///

///

///

///

///

///

Case 2:13-cr-00228-MCE Document 29 Filed 06/24/14 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3

4. Nothing in this stipulation and order shall preclude a finding that other 

provisions of the Speedy Trial Act dictate that additional time periods are 

excludable from the period within which a trial must commence.

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

Dated: June 16, 2014 /s/ Candace A. Fry

CANDACE A. FRY, Attorney for

RUTH WILLIS, Defendant

 

 

Dated: June 16, 2014 BENJAMIN B. WAGNER,

United States Attorney

By /s/ Candace A. Fry for 

TODD A. PICKLES, Assistant

United States Attorney

(Signed for AUSA Pickles with his

prior authorization)

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 20, 2014

Case 2:13-cr-00228-MCE Document 29 Filed 06/24/14 Page 3 of 3