Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-00206/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-00206-2/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Jennifer M. Easton
Plaintiff
Solano County Jail
Defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JENNIFER M. EASTON,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-06-0206 LKK GGH P

vs.

SOLANO COUNTY JAIL, et al.,

Defendants. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

By order filed April 10, 2006, the court granted plaintiff thirty days to file an

amended complaint. In the April 10th order, the court informed plaintiff of the deficiencies in

his complaint. The thirty day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not filed an amended

complaint or otherwise responded to the court’s order.

For the reasons given in the April 10, 2006, order, IT IS HEREBY

RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 11-110; Fed.

R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of Title 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within

twenty days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file

written objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate 

Case 2:06-cv-00206-LKK -GGH Document 8 Filed 07/12/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections

within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. 

DATED: 7/12/06

/s/ Gregory G. Hollows

 

GREGORY G. HOLLOWS

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

GGH:035

east0206.fta

Case 2:06-cv-00206-LKK -GGH Document 8 Filed 07/12/06 Page 2 of 2