Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_19-cr-00022/USCOURTS-caed-2_19-cr-00022-5/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Leticia Tyshalle Marie Reed
Defendant
USA
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1 STIPULATION REGARDING EXCLUDABLE TIME 

PERIODS UNDER SPEEDY TRIAL ACT

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

MCGREGOR W. SCOTT 

United States Attorney 

SHELLEY D. WEGER 

Assistant United States Attorney 

501 I Street, Suite 10-100 

Sacramento, CA 95814 

Telephone: (916) 554-2700 

Facsimile: (916) 554-2900 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

United States of America 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

LETICIA TYSHALLE MARIE REED, 

 Defendant. 

CASE NO. 2:19-CR-00022 TLN 

STIPULATION REGARDING EXCLUDABLE 

TIME PERIODS UNDER SPEEDY TRIAL ACT; 

FINDINGS AND ORDER 

DATE: October 17, 2019 

TIME: 9:30 a.m. 

COURT: Hon. Troy L. Nunley 

STIPULATION 

Plaintiff United States of America, by and through its counsel of record, and defendant, by and 

through defendant’s counsel of record, hereby stipulate as follows: 

1. By previous order, this matter was set for status on October 17, 2019. 

2. By this stipulation, defendant now moves to continue the status conference until January 

9, 2020, at 9:30 a.m., and to exclude time between October 17, 2019, and January 9, 2020, under Local 

Code T4. 

3. The parties agree and stipulate, and request that the Court find the following: 

a) The government has produced over 8,000 pages of discovery associated with this 

case, which includes among other things personal tax returns, investigative reports, and financial 

records. The discovery, which consists of tax and personally identifying information, is subject 

to a protective order that permits the defendant to review the discovery only in the presence of a 

Case 2:19-cr-00022-DJC Document 27 Filed 10/15/19 Page 1 of 3
 

2 STIPULATION REGARDING EXCLUDABLE TIME 

PERIODS UNDER SPEEDY TRIAL ACT

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

member of her defense team. 

b) Counsel for defendant desires additional time to consult and review the discovery 

with his client due to the voluminous nature of the discovery and the order in place only allowing 

defendant to review discovery while in the presence of her attorney, to conduct investigation and 

research related to the charges, and discuss potential resolutions. Although, Defense Counsel has 

had numerous telephonic and email conversations with defendant, Defense Counsel has only 

been able to meet in person with his client on two occasions, additional meetings are necessary 

to review the voluminous discovery and prepare a potential defense. Additionally, Defense 

Counsel is seeking input from more than one potential expert in areas such as accounting and 

computer forensics. The number of individuals allegedly involved with the defendant’s conduct 

are over 60 and the monetary amount is in the hundreds of thousands of dollars. Because of the 

graduated scale of potential sentences due to the dollar amount involved each claim has to be 

thoroughly vetted prior to plea or trial setting. 

c) Counsel for defendant believes that failure to grant the above-requested 

continuance would deny him the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into 

account the exercise of due diligence. 

d) The government does not object to the continuance. 

e) Based on the above-stated findings, the ends of justice served by continuing the 

case as requested outweigh the interest of the public and the defendant in a trial within the 

original date prescribed by the Speedy Trial Act. 

f) For the purpose of computing time under the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161, 

et seq., within which trial must commence, the time period of October 17, 2019 to January 9, 

2020, inclusive, is deemed excludable pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 3161(h)(7)(A), B(iv) [Local Code 

T4] because it results from a continuance granted by the Court at defendant’s request on the basis 

of the Court’s finding that the ends of justice served by taking such action outweigh the best 

interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. 

THE REMAINDER OF THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY BLANK 

Case 2:19-cr-00022-DJC Document 27 Filed 10/15/19 Page 2 of 3
 

3 STIPULATION REGARDING EXCLUDABLE TIME 

PERIODS UNDER SPEEDY TRIAL ACT

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

4. Nothing in this stipulation and order shall preclude a finding that other provisions of the 

Speedy Trial Act dictate that additional time periods are excludable from the period within which a trial 

must commence. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

Dated: October 11, 2019 MCGREGOR W. SCOTT 

United States Attorney 

/s/ SHELLEY D. WEGER

 SHELLEY D. WEGER

Assistant United States Attorney 

Dated: October 11, 2019 /s/ JARED FAVERO 

JARED FAVERO 

Counsel for Defendant 

LETICIA TYSHALLE MARIE REED 

FINDINGS AND ORDER 

IT IS SO FOUND AND ORDERED this 15th day of October, 2019. 

Case 2:19-cr-00022-DJC Document 27 Filed 10/15/19 Page 3 of 3