Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_06-cv-02009/USCOURTS-cand-4_06-cv-02009-8/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Immersion Corporation
Counter-defendant
Internet Services LLC
Counter-claimant

Document Text:

KEKER & VAN NEST, LLP

1 DARAL YN J. DURIE - #169825

MARK A. LEMLEY - #155830

2 MATTHIAS A. KAMBER - #232147

710 Sansome Street

3 San Francisco, CA 9411 1 - 1704

Telephone: (415) 391-5400

4 Facsimile: (415) 397-7188

5 Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterclaim-Defendant

INTERNET SERVICES LLC

6

7 IRELL & MANELLA LLP

MORGAN CHU - #70446

RICHARD M. BIRNHOLZ - #151543

ALAN J. HEINRICH - #212782

1 800 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 900

Los Angeles, CA 90067-4276

10 Telephone: (310) 277-1010

Facsimile: (310) 203-7199

8

9

11

Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaim-Plaintiff

12 IMMERSION CORPORATION

13

14

15

16

17

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

INTERNET SERVICES, LLC, a California

18 Limited Liabilty Company

Plaintiff-Counterclaim

19 Defendant.

Case No. 4:06-CV-02009-CW (EDL)

20 v.

STIPULATION AND (PROPOSED)

ORDER MODIFYING BRIEFING

SCHEDULE RE IMMERSION'S

. 21 IMMERSION CORPORATION, a Delaware MOTION TO COMPEL

corporation

22. Defendant-Counterclaim

Plaintiff.

412910.01

23

24

25

26

27

Judge: Hon. Claudia Wilken

Mag. Judge: Hon. Elizabeth D. LaPorte

?R

STIPULATION AND (PROPOSED) ORDER MODIFYING BRIEFING

SCHEDULE RE IMMERSION'S MOTION TO COMPEL

Case 4:06-cv-02009-CW Document 65 Filed 03/10/08 Page 1 of 4
1 Pursuant to Northern District Local Rules 6-2 and 7-12, the paries to this action,

2 Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant Internet Services LLC ("ISLLC") and Defendant/Counterclaim

3 Plaintiff Imersion Corporation ("Immersion"), by and through their counsel of record, hereby

4 respectfully submit this stipulation with regard to the briefing schedule set in the Court's

5 February 27,2008 Order Re Discovery Procedures and Setting Motion Hearing.

6 REASONS FOR REQUESTED SCHEDULE MODIFICATION

7 1. On February27, 2008, the Cour issued its Order Re Discovery Procedures and

8 Setting Motion Hearing (Docket No. 63). That Order sets March 11,2008, as the date by which

9 ISLLC must file its brief in opposition to Immersion's Motion to Compel Production of

10 Documents and Testimony (Docket No. 56). Further, the Order sets March 18,2008, as the date

11 by which Immersion must file its related reply brief.

12 2. ISLLC has requested that the due date for its opposition brief be extended by one

13 week to accommodate the vacation schedule ofISLLC'scounsel handling the briefing.

14 Immersion's counsel agreed to afford ISLLC this professional courtesy to extend briefing,

15 subject to the approval of the Cour and provided that the hearing date would not be continued

16 and the time for Immersion's reply brief would not be compromised. ISLLC has prepared this

17 stipulation to formalize this request that the deadline for ISLLC's opposition brief and

18 Immersion's reply brief be modified by one week such that ISLLC's opposition brief is due

19 March 18,2008, and Immersion's reply brief is due March 25,2008.

20 PREVIOUS TIME MODIFICATIONS

21 The following time modifications relate to the Cour's May 3, 2007 Scheduling Order,

22 and do not relate specifically to the discovery motion pending before the Cour:

23 3. On August 31, 2006, the parties filed a Stipulation and (Proposed) Order Staying

24 Action Pending Appeal (Docket No. 32). The Court issued a modified Order on September 5,

25 2006, which continued the Initial Case Management Conference set for September 8, 2006, to

26 December 8, 2006 (Docket No. 33).

27

?R

412910.02

1

STIPULATION AND (PROPOSED) ORDER MODIFYING BRIEFING

SCHEDULE RE IMMERSION'S MOTION TO COMPEL

Case 4:06-cv-02009-CW Document 65 Filed 03/10/08 Page 2 of 4
1 4. On December 1, 2006, the paries fied a second Stipulation and (Proposed) Order

2 Staying Action Pending Appeal (Docket No. 34). The Court issued a related Order on

3 December 5, 2006, which continued the Initial Case Management Conference set for December

4 8,2006, to April 13, 2007 (Docket No. 35).

5 5. On April 5, 2007, the parties filed a Stipulation and (Proposed) Order Continuing

6 and Resetting Initial Case Management Conference (Docket No. 36). The Cour issued a related

7 Order on April 9, 2007, which continued the Initial Case Management Conference set for April

8 13,2007 to May 1,2007 (Docket No. 37).

9 6. On December 7, 2007, the paries filed a Stipulation and (Proposed) Order

10 Modifying Case Management Order. The Court issued a related Order on December 1 1, 2007,

11 which set January 31,2008 as the date by which depositions of fact witnesses would be

12 completed.

13 7. On January 21,2008, the parties fied a Stipulation and (Proposed) Order

14 Modifying Case Management Order (Docket No. 53). The Court issued a related Order on

15 January 21,2008, which set February 20, 2008 as the date by which depositions of fact witnesses

16 would be completed (Docket No. 54).

17 8. On February 20, 2008, ISLLC filed a Motion to Extend Pending Deadlines by90

18 Days for various reasons, including matters concerning ISLLC's stated desire to substitute

19 counsel (Docket No. 58). Immersion opposed that motion on February 25,2008 (Docket No.

20 61). The Cour has not yet ruled on the motion.

21 EFFECT OF TIME MODIFICATION ON SCHEDULE

22 9. This stipulated extension would modify only the briefing deadlines set forth in the

23 Court's February 27,2008 Order Re Discovery Procedures and Setting Motion Hearing; it does

24 not impact the April 1,2008 hearing date. Further, the extension of these deadlines would not

25 affect other dates set forth in the Court's Scheduling Order, dated May 3, 2007, as subsequently

26 modified (see irir 3-7).

27

?R

412910.02

2

STIPULATION AND (PROPOSED) ORDER MODIFYING BRIEFING

SCHEDULE RE IMMRSION'S MOTION TO COMPEL

Case 4:06-cv-02009-CW Document 65 Filed 03/10/08 Page 3 of 4
1 THEREFORE, in light of the foregoing, the paries stipulate and agree that:

2

3

4

5

6

7

. ISLLC shall have until March 18, 2008, to file its brief in opposition to

Immersion's Motion to Compel Production of Documents and Testimony.

. Immersion shall have until March 25,2008, to file its brief in reply to ISLLC's

opposition to Immersion's Motion to Compel Production of Documents and

Testimony.

. The Court's February 27,2008 Order Re Discovery Procedures and Setting

8 Motion Hearing shall otherwise remain unchanged.

9 SO STIPULATED:

10

11

12

Dated: March 10, 2008

13

14

15

16

17

Dated: March 10, 2008

Respectfully submitted,

KEKER & VAN NEST, LLP

By: /s/ Matthias A. Kamber

MATTHIAS A. KAMBER

Attorneys for Plaintiff INTERNET

SERVICES, LLC

Respectfully submitted,

IRELL & MANELLA, LLP

By: /s/ Richard M. Birnolz

RICHARD M. BIRNHOLZ

Attorneys for Defendant IMMERSION

CORP.

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

The Hon. Elizabeth D. LaPorte

United States Magistrate Judge

3

STIPULATION AND (PROPOSED) ORDER MODIFYING BRIEFING

SCHEDULE RE IMMERSION'S MOTION TO COMPEL

March 10, 2008

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte

Case 4:06-cv-02009-CW Document 65 Filed 03/10/08 Page 4 of 4