Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_16-cv-03399/USCOURTS-cand-4_16-cv-03399-2/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Bay Area Rapid Transit District
Defendant
Jodi Brunker
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION BRUNKER, et al. v. SF BART DISTRICT

OF TIME TO CONDUCT ADR 1 Case No. 3:16-cv-03399-HSG

DAVID E. MASTAGNI, ESQ. (SBN 204244)

ISAAC S. STEVENS, ESQ. (SBN 251245)

ACE T. TATE, ESQ. (SBN 262015)

MASTAGNI HOLSTEDT

A Professional Corporation

1912 “I” Street

Sacramento, California 95811

Telephone: (916) 446-4692

Facsimile: (916) 447-4614

davidm@mastagni.com

istevens@mastagni.com

atate@mastagni.com

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

OFFICE OF THE GENERAL COUNSEL

SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA RAPID

TRANSIT DISTRICT

VICKI R. NUETZEL (SBN 115124)

Email: vnuetze@bart.gov

SAM N. DAWOOD (SBN 178862)

Email: sdawood@bart.gov

300 Lakeside Drive, 23rd Floor

Oakland, California 94612-3534

Tel: (510) 464-6050

Fax: (510) 464-6049

Attorneys for Defendant

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case No. 3:16-cv-03399-HSG

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR 

EXTENSION OF TIME TO CONDUCT 

PRIVATE ADR

JODI BRUNKER, et al., on behalf of 

herself and all similarly situated individuals,

 Plaintiffs,

v.

SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA RAPID 

TRANSIT DISTRICT,

 Defendant.

 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Pursuant to the Court’s August 31, 2016 Order Granting Stipulation re Private ADR (Dkt. 

No. 28), the parties have a deadline of November 29, 2016 to conduct private ADR. The parties 

have been working diligently towards informal exchange of information, facilitated notification

to putative plaintiffs, and selection of a mediator to ensure a productive mediation session. 

Mediation is presently scheduled for January 27, 2017 before the Hon. Raul A. Ramirez, Judge 

Case 4:16-cv-03399-HSG Document 44 Filed 11/30/16 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION BRUNKER, et al. v. SF BART DISTRICT

OF TIME TO CONDUCT ADR 2 Case No. 3:16-cv-03399-HSG

Retired. Accordingly, the parties respectfully request an extension of time to comply with the 

Court’s Order re Private ADR, up to and including February 1, 2017.

Respectfully submitted,

Dated: November 29, 2016 MASTAGNI HOLSTEDT, APC

By: /s/ Ace T. Tate

DAVID E. MASTAGNI, ESQ.

ISAAC S. STEVENS, ESQ.

ACE T. TATE, ESQ.

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

Dated: November 29, 2016 OFFICE OF THE GENERAL COUNSEL

SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA RAPID

TRANSIT DISTRICT

By: /s/ Vicki R. Nuetzel

VICKI R. NUETZEL, ESQ.

SAM N. DAWOOD, ESQ.

Attorneys for Defendant

ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED that the parties may have until 

February 1, 2017 to conduct private ADR in this matter.

DATED: November 30, 2016 _________________________________

HONORABLE HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR.,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 4:16-cv-03399-HSG Document 44 Filed 11/30/16 Page 2 of 2