Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-arwd-3_06-cv-03051/USCOURTS-arwd-3_06-cv-03051-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Sheila Boggess
Plaintiff
Gannett Corporation
Defendant
The Baxter Bulletin, Inc.
Defendant

Document Text:

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS

HARRISON DIVISION

SHEILA BOGGESS PLAINTIFF

v. Civil No. 06-3051

GANNETT CORPORATION and

THE BAXTER BULLETIN, INC. DEFENDANT

O R D E R

Now on this 29th day of January, 2007, comes on for consideration

Defendants' Motion For Confidentiality Protective Order (document #13).

The motion states that "plaintiff has indicated that she is amenable

to entering into a confidentiality agreement to prohibit the use of

information designated confidential outside the confines of this

litigation," but that she "is not willing to agree to seek an order

from this Court that information designated confidential be filed under

seal." This statement makes it clear that the only real dispute

between the parties is not what must be produced, nor the

confidentiality thereof, but only the manner in which confidential

material should be handled in the event that it is to be filed as

evidence in support of some future motion. The Court believes that

such problems are sufficiently addressed by the privacy provisions of

General Order No. 36, and the CM/ECF Administrative Policies and

Procedures Manual for Civil Filings thereby approved, and that privacy

problems can be readily avoided by redaction of identifying information

as therein required. The motion is, therefore, denied.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

 /s/ Jimm Larry Hendren 

JIMM LARRY HENDREN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:06-cv-03051-JLH Document 15 Filed 01/29/07 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: <pageID>