Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-14-07752/USCOURTS-ca4-14-07752-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Matthew Britton
Appellee
Veronica Cromer
Appellee
Maurice L. Cumberlander
Appellant
Jane Fletcher
Appellee
King George County Circuit Court
Appellee
Teresa Pagliaro
Appellee
Jennifer Pollard
Appellee

Document Text:

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-7752

MAURICE L. CUMBERLANDER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

KING GEORGE COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT, Municipality; JENNIFER 

POLLARD, Assistant Commonwealth Attorney for “Municipality”; 

VERONICA CROMER, Court Appointed Public Defender for the 

Public Defender’s Office; MATTHEW BRITTON, Commonwealth 

Attorney for the “Municipality”; TERESA PAGLIARO, Court 

Appointed Attorney of the Pagliaro Law Firm; JANE FLETCHER, 

Virginia State Bar Deputy Intake Counsel,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior

District Judge. (1:14-cv-01278-CMH-JFA)

Submitted: March 17, 2015 Decided: March 20, 2015

Before WILKINSON and KING, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Maurice L. Cumberlander, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 14-7752 Doc: 22 Filed: 03/20/2015 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Maurice L. Cumberlander appeals the district court’s order 

dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint under 28 U.S.C. 

§ 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no 

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated 

by the district court. Cumberlander v. King George Cnty. 

Circuit Court, No. 1:14-cv-01278-CMH-JFA (E.D. Va. Nov. 12, 

2014). We deny Cumberlander’s motion for injunctive relief 

pending appeal as moot. We dispense with oral argument because 

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Appeal: 14-7752 Doc: 22 Filed: 03/20/2015 Pg: 2 of 2