Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_10-cv-00853/USCOURTS-caed-2_10-cv-00853-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Richard Friedman
Defendant
Scott Friedman
Defendant
River City Bank
Plaintiff
Craig Shirk
Defendant
Linda Dollahan Shirk
Defendant
Bob Thomas
Defendant
Carol Thomas
Defendant

Document Text:

1 

[PROPOSED] ORDER RE: RETENTION OF JURISDICTION [FRCP Rule 41] 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

RIVER CITY BANK, a California 

corporation, 

 Plaintiff, 

vs. 

CRAIG SHIRK, an individual; LINDA 

DOLLAHAN SHIRK, an individual; 

RICHARD FRIEDMAN, an individual; 

SCOTT FRIEDMAN, an individual; 

BOB THOMAS, an individual; CAROL 

THOMAS, an individual; and DOES 1 

through 50, inclusive, 

 Defendants. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No.: 2:10-CV-00853-MCE-KJN 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

The Court is in receipt of the Parties’ Stipulation for 

Dismissal, filed July 28, 2010. The parties 

 ask that Defendants Bob Thomas, Carol Thomas, Richard Friedman and 

Scott Friedman be dismissed from this action, with prejudice. With 

regard to the remaining two Defendants, Craig Shirk and Linda 

Dollahan Shirk (“the Shirks”), counsel have advised the Court that a 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 2:10-cv-00853-MCE-KJN Document 13 Filed 08/13/10 Page 1 of 2
2 

[PROPOSED] ORDER RE: RETENTION OF JURISDICTION [FRCP Rule 41] 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

settlement agreement has been reached under the terms of which the 

Shirks will pay monthly payments to Plaintiff for a period of sixty 

(60) months, ending on July 20, 2010. See Docket No. 11. 

 The parties ask this case retain jurisdiction and keep the case 

open until the Shirks’ monthly payment obligations under the 

settlement agreement have been exhausted. 

Keeping this case open in order to monitor the Shirks’ 

compliance with the settlement agreement is not necessary. Given 

the parties’ representation that this matter has otherwise been 

resolved, this case is dismissed in its entirety. The Court will 

retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the settlement, if 

necessary, and will reopen the case as appropriate if non-compliance 

occurs and intervention is indeed indicated. In the meantime, 

however, the Clerk of Court is directed to close the file. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: August 12, 2010 

__________________________________ 

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 2:10-cv-00853-MCE-KJN Document 13 Filed 08/13/10 Page 2 of 2