Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca11-24-12452/USCOURTS-ca11-24-12452-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
William Earl Jackson
Appellant
United States of America
Appellee

Document Text:

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

In the

United States Court of Appeals

For the Eleventh Circuit

____________________

No. 24-12452

Non-Argument Calendar

____________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

WILLIAM EARL JACKSON, 

Defendant-Appellant.

____________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Florida

D.C. Docket No. 8:24-cr-00135-VMC-TGW-1

____________________

USCA11 Case: 24-12452 Document: 23-1 Date Filed: 12/10/2024 Page: 1 of 2
2 Opinion of the Court 24-12452

Before JORDAN, LUCK, and BRASHER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Meghan Ann Collins, counsel for William Earl Jackson in 

this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further 

representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders 

v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the 

entire record reveals that counsel’s overall assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Jackson’s conviction 

and sentence are AFFIRMED.

USCA11 Case: 24-12452 Document: 23-1 Date Filed: 12/10/2024 Page: 2 of 2