Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-00916/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-00916-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
OfficeMax, Inc.
Defendant
Mark Richards
Plaintiff

Document Text:

-1- 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

ROBERT P. HENK State Bar No.: 147490 

SHERI LEONARD State Bar No.: 173544 

HenkLeonard 

A Professional Law Corporation 

735 Sunrise Avenue, Suite 160 

Roseville, CA 95661 

Telephone: (916) 787-4544 

Fax: (916) 787-4530 

Email: Henkleonard@aol.com

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

Mark Richards 

HOWARD L. MAGEE State Bar No.: 185199 

OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART P.C. 

633 West Fifth Street, Suite 5300 

Los Angeles, California 90071 

Telephone: (213) 239-9800 

Facsimile: (213) 239-9045 

Attorneys for Defendant 

OfficeMax North America, Inc. 

(formerly “OfficeMax, Inc.”) 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

MARK RICHARDS, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

OFFICEMAX, INC. and DOES 1 through 5, 

inclusive, 

Defendant. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 2:05-cv-0916 MCE (KJM) 

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL 

WITH PREJUDICE; AND ORDER 

THEREON

Courtroom: 3 

Judge: Morrison C. England, Jr. 

WHEREAS, on or about April 7, 2005, Plaintiff Mark Richards (hereinafter 

referred to as “Plaintiff”) filed a Complaint for Damages in the Sacramento County 

Superior Court against Defendant OfficeMax North America, Inc. (formerly “OfficeMax, 

Inc.”, hereinafter referred to as “OfficeMax” or “Defendant”), Case No. 05AS01541, 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 2:05-cv-00916-MCE -KJM Document 9 Filed 03/17/06 Page 1 of 3
-2- 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

alleging causes of action for (1) wrongful termination in violation of public policy; and 

(2) retaliation in violation of the California Fair Employment and Housing Act (“FEHA”); 

WHEREAS, on May 9, 2005, Defendant timely removed Sacramento 

Superior Court Case No. 05AS01541 to the United States District Court, Eastern District of 

California, Case No. CIV-S-05-0916 MCE (KJM) (the “Lawsuit”); 

WHEREAS, counsel for Plaintiff and Defendant have discussed the merits of 

the Lawsuit and have reached a resolution of this dispute by agreeing to enter into a 

Confidential Settlement Agreement and General Release; 

WHEREAS, the Parties have agreed to bear their own costs and attorneys’ 

fees in connection with this Lawsuit; 

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the Plaintiff and Defendant, 

through their designated counsel of record, that this case be dismissed in its entirety, with 

prejudice, pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1). 

Dated: March __, 2006 HENK LEONARD, A Professional Law 

Corporation 

By: 

Robert Henk 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

Mark Richards 

Dated: March __, 2006 OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & 

STEWART P.C. 

By: 

Howard L. Magee 

Attorneys for Defendant 

OfficeMax North America, Inc. 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 2:05-cv-00916-MCE -KJM Document 9 Filed 03/17/06 Page 2 of 3
-3- 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

ORDER 

IT IS SO ORDERED that this case be dismissed in its entirety, with 

prejudice, pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1). The Parties to this action will bear their own costs 

and attorneys’ fees. 

Dated: March 15, 2006

__________________________________ 

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 2:05-cv-00916-MCE -KJM Document 9 Filed 03/17/06 Page 3 of 3