Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca8-15-02629/USCOURTS-ca8-15-02629-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Ted Anderson
Appellee
Kevin Bergman
Appellee
Paula Fesenmeyer
Appellant
William D. Geary
Appellee
Land Bank of KC
Appellee
Theodore G. Richardson
Appellee
Chad Stewart
Appellee

Document Text:

United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 15-2629

___________________________

PAULA FESENMEYER

lllllllllllllllllllll PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT

v.

LAND BANK OF KC; KEVIN BERGMAN; THEODORE G.

RICHARDSON, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS A LICENSED

ATTORNEY; WILLIAM D. GEARY, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY

AS A LICENSED ATTORNEY; CHAD STEWART, IN HIS

OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS A LICENSED ATTORNEY; TED

ANDERSON, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS A LICENSED ATTORNEY

lllllllllllllllllllll DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES

____________

APPEAL FROM UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI - KANSAS CITY

____________

Appellate Case: 15-2629 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/08/2016 Entry ID: 4386554 
 SUBMITTED: April 4, 2016

FILED: April 8, 2016 

[Unpublished]

____________

BEFORE LOKEN, BYE, AND KELLY, CIRCUIT JUDGES.

____________

PER CURIAM.

PAULA FESENMEYER APPEALS AFTER THE DISTRICT

COURT1

 DISMISSED HER PRO SE ACTION UNDER THE

AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT (ADA), AS BARRED BY

RES JUDICATA. IN HER BRIEF ON APPEAL, SHE CHALLENGES

ONLY THE DISTRICT COURT’S DENIAL OF CERTAIN

ACCOMMODATIONS.

UPON CAREFUL REVIEW, WE CONCLUDE THAT THE

DISTRICT COURT APPROPRIATELY HANDLED FESENMEYER’S

1

THE HONORABLE STEPHEN R. BOUGH, UNITED STATES

DISTRICT JUDGE FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI.

-2-

Appellate Case: 15-2629 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/08/2016 Entry ID: 4386554 
VARIOUS REQUESTS FOR ACCOMMODATIONS. SEE 42 U.S.C.

§ 12131(1) (UNDER ADA, OMITTING FEDERAL GOVERNMENT

FROM DEFINITION OF PUBLIC ENTITY); CF. TENNESSEE V.

LANE, 541 U.S. 509, 522-23, 530-33 (2004) (DISCUSSING

REASONABLE-ACCOMMODATION REQUIREMENTS UNDER

ADA AND FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT). ACCORDINGLY, WE

AFFIRM. SEE 8TH CIR. R. 47B. ALL PENDING MOTIONS ARE

DENIED. 

______________________________

-3-

Appellate Case: 15-2629 Page: 3 Date Filed: 04/08/2016 Entry ID: 4386554