Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-15-06598/USCOURTS-ca4-15-06598-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Curtis Daryle Tinsley
Appellant
United States of America
Appellee

Document Text:

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-6598

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

CURTIS DARYLE TINSLEY,

Defendant – Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of Virginia, at Danville. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior

District Judge. (4:06-cr-00009-JLK-2)

Submitted: August 20, 2015 Decided: August 25, 2015

Before DUNCAN, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Curtis Daryle Tinsley, Appellant Pro Se. Craig Jon Jacobsen, I, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 15-6598 Doc: 7 Filed: 08/25/2015 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Curtis Daryle Tinsley appeals the district court’s order 

denying relief on his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for 

sentence reduction. We have reviewed the record and find no 

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated 

by the district court. United States v. Tinsley, No. 4:06-cr00009-JLK-2 (W.D. Va. Mar. 23, 2015). We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before this court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Appeal: 15-6598 Doc: 7 Filed: 08/25/2015 Pg: 2 of 2