Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca10-10-03151/USCOURTS-ca10-10-03151-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
John G. Westine
Petitioner

Document Text:

FILED

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

August 20, 2010

Elisabeth A. Shumaker

Clerk of Court

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

In re: JOHN G. WESTINE,

 Petitioner. No. 10-3151

ORDER

On July 12, 2010, this court issued an order directing the petitioner, Mr.

Westine, to comply with filing restrictions imposed by this court in Westine v.

Perrill, Nos. 05-1498 & 05-1516, 2006 WL 1520567 (10th Cir. 2006). The court’s

July 12, 2010 order advised Mr. Westine that his failure to respond fully would

subject this proceeding to dismissal for lack of prosecution. 

On July 26, 2010, Mr. Westine filed what purported to be a response to the

court’s July 12, 2010 order. In that response, Mr. Westine stated that he was not

providing a list of his cases, currently pending or filed previously with this court

(as required by the court’s filing restrictions and by this court’s July 12, 2010

order), because none of those cases were “applicable” to the present proceeding. 

On July 29, 2010, this court issued a second order, advising Mr. Westine that his

response was insufficient and giving him additional time, to and including August

12, 2010, to supplement his response by providing the required list of all of his

Appellate Case: 10-3151 Document: 01018481550 Date Filed: 08/20/2010 Page: 1 
2

other cases filed with this court, with a statement indicating the current status or

disposition of each case. That order again advised Mr. Westine that his failure to

comply could result in the dismissal of this proceeding for lack of prosecution. 

Mr. Westine has filed a response to the July 29, 2010 order, generally

stating that he does not have sufficient access to legal research materials to

provide the required list of cases. 

Mr. Westine has failed to comply with the court’s filing restrictions. The

time for compliance has expired. Therefore, this matter is dismissed for failure to

prosecute. See 10th Cir. R. 42.1. 

Entered for the Court

ELISABETH SHUMAKER, Clerk of Court 

by:

Christine Van Coney

Counsel to the Clerk

Appellate Case: 10-3151 Document: 01018481550 Date Filed: 08/20/2010 Page: 2