Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-01197/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-01197-2/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Jill Brown
Respondent
Jon Zin
Petitioner

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JON ZIN,

Petitioner, No. CIV S-05-1197 FCD PAN P

vs.

JILL BROWN, 

Respondent. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

Two recent court orders were served on petitioner’s address of record and both

were returned by the postal service. It appears that petitioner has failed to comply with Local

Rule 83-182(f), which requires that a party appearing in propria persona inform the court of any

address change.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed for

petitioner's failure to keep the court apprised of his current address. See Local Rules 83-182(f)

and 11-110 (E.D. Cal. 1997).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty

days after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written

objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s

Case 2:05-cv-01197-FCD-PAN Document 13 Filed 03/27/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Findings and Recommendations.” The parties are advised that failure to file objections within

the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951

F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: March 27, 2006. 

12

zin1197.133a

Case 2:05-cv-01197-FCD-PAN Document 13 Filed 03/27/06 Page 2 of 2