Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_09-cv-03683/USCOURTS-cand-3_09-cv-03683-2/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
International Business Machines Corp.
Defendant
Lee Kemp
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Stipulation to Extend Deadlines 

Case No. CV 09-03683-MHP

Catherine Nasser (State Bar No. 246191) 

JONES DAY 

555 California Street, 26th Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94105 

Telephone: (415) 626-3939 

Facsimile: (415) 875-5700 

Email: cnasser@jonesday.com 

Matthew W. Lampe (admitted pro hac vice) 

mwlampe@jonesday.com 

Wendy C. Butler (admitted pro hac vice) 

wbutler@jonesday.com 

JONES DAY 

222 East 41st Street 

New York, NY 10017 

Telephone: (212) 326-3939 

Facsimile: (212) 755-7306 

Attorneys for Defendant 

INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES 

CORPORATION 

Mark R. Thierman Cal SB# 72913 

THIERMAN LAW FIRM, PC 

7287 Lakeside Drive 

Reno, Nevada 89511 

Tel: (775) 284-1500 

Scott A. Miller, Esq., SB # 230322 

LAW OFFICE OF SCOTT A. 

MILLER 

A Professional Corporation 

16133 Ventura Blvd. Suite 645 

Encino, CA 91436 

Tel.: (818) 788-8081 

Steven L. Miller, Esq., SB # 

106023 

LAW OFFICE OF STEVEN L. 

MILLER 

A Professional Corporation 

16133 Ventura Blvd. Suite 645 

Encino, CA 91436 

Tel.: (818) 986-8900 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

LEE KEMP, individually and on behalf of 

all others similarly situated, the general 

public, and as an “aggrieved employee” 

under the California Labor Code Private 

Attorney General Act, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS 

MACHINES CORP., a New York 

Corporation, and DOES 1-50, inclusive, 

Defendant.

Case No. CV 09-03683-MHP 

STIPULATION EXTENDING 

DEADLINES 

Pursuant to Local Rules 6-1(b) and 7-12, Plaintiff Lee Kemp (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant 

International Business Machines Corporation (“Defendant”), by and through their undersigned 

counsel, hereby stipulate and request as follows: 

Case 3:09-cv-03683-EMC Document 32 Filed 06/03/10 Page 1 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINES 

- 2 - 

Case No. CV 09-03683-MHP 

WHEREAS, on November 23, 2009, the Court entered an Order After Hearing requiring 

that the parties complete private ADR by April 30, 2010; 

WHEREAS, the Court’s November 23, 2009 Order provided that if ADR failed, 

Defendant must move, plead, or otherwise respond to the First Amended Complaint within ten 

days; 

WHEREAS, on April 30, 2010, the Court entered an Order extending the deadline to 

complete private ADR until May 31, 2010; 

WHEREAS, the Court’s April 30, 2010 Order provided that if ADR failed, Defendant 

must move, plead, or otherwise respond to the First Amended Complaint by June 30, 2010; 

WHEREAS, the parties require additional time to discuss the case prior to the deadline to 

complete private ADR; 

WHEREAS, the parties also agree that Defendant shall therefore have additional time to 

answer, move or otherwise respond to the First Amended Complaint; 

WHEREAS, such extensions will not alter the date of any other event or deadline already 

fixed by the Court; 

WHEREAS, the only prior time modifications were the Court’s September 25, 2009 and 

April 30, 2010 extensions of Defendant’s deadline to respond to the First Amended Complaint 

and the Court’s April 30, 2010 extension of the ADR deadline. 

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties, through their respective 

counsel: 

1. The deadline to complete private ADR is extended until August 2, 2010; and 

2. Defendant shall have until September 1, 2010, to move, plead, or otherwise 

respond to the First Amended Complaint. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

/ / / 

/ / / 

Case 3:09-cv-03683-EMC Document 32 Filed 06/03/10 Page 2 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINES 

- 3 - 

Case No. CV 09-03683-MHP 

Dated: June 2, 2010 JONES DAY 

By: /S/ Catherine S. Nasser 

Catherine S. Nasser 

Attorneys for Defendant 

INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS 

MACHINES CORPORATION 

Dated: June 2, 2010 LAW OFFICE OF SCOTT A. MILLER 

By: /S/ Scott A. Miller 

Scott A. Miller 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

LEE KEMP 

SIGNATURE ATTESTATION

 I hereby attest that I have on file all holograph signatures for any signatures indicated by a 

“conformed” signature (/S/) within this efiled document. 

Dated: June 2, 2010 JONES DAY 

By: /S/ Catherine S. Nasser 

Catherine S. Nasser 

Attorneys for Defendant 

INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS 

MACHINES CORPORATION 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: _____________, 2010 

 

 __________________________________ 

 Honorable Marilyn Hall Patel 

 United States District Court Judge 

SFI-642672v1 

June 3

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Marilyn H. Patel

Case 3:09-cv-03683-EMC Document 32 Filed 06/03/10 Page 3 of 3