Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-01269/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-01269-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Attorney General of the State of California
Respondent
A. Michael Mendoza
Petitioner

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

A. MICHAEL MENDOZA,

Petitioner, No. CIV S-06-1269 DFL DAD P

vs.

THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF

THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA,

Respondent. ORDER

 /

Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of

habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States

Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On August 21, 2006, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations

herein which were served on petitioner and which contained notice to petitioner that any

objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Petitioner

has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be

supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY

ORDERED that:

/////

Case 2:06-cv-01269-DFL-DAD Document 6 Filed 01/16/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

1. The findings and recommendations filed August 21, 2006, are adopted in full;

and

2. Petitioner’s habeas petition is dismissed without prejudice for failure to

exhaust available state court remedies.

DATED: 1/15/2007

DAVID F. LEVI

United States District Judge

Case 2:06-cv-01269-DFL-DAD Document 6 Filed 01/16/07 Page 2 of 2