Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-00669/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-00669-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Parrish Bryant Garvin
Petitioner
Richard J. Kirkland
Respondent

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

U.S. District Court

 E. D. California 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

PARRISH BRYANT GARVIN, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

v. )

)

RICHARD J. KIRKLAND, )

)

Respondent. )

____________________________________)

1:06-CV-0669 OWW SMS HC 

ORDER DISMISSING PETITION FOR WRIT

OF HABEAS CORPUS

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT

TO ENTER JUDGMENT

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus 

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. 

On June 1, 2006, the Court received a habeas petition from Petitioner, and a new case was

erroneously opened. On March 7, 2000, in Parrish Garvin v. Kings County, CIV F 00 5140 AWI LJO

P, District Judge Anthony W. Ishii issued an order declaring Petitioner to be a vexatious litigant.

Pursuant to that order, the Court must screen all documents filed by Parrish Garvin and return any

document not meeting the specific criteria outlined in the order.

In this case, Petitioner’s filing is deficient because:

1) Petitioner did not include with the petition the filing fee or a completed application to

proceed in forma pauperis, along with a certified copy of Petitioner’s prison trust account;

2) Petitioner did not prove that he has exhausted his state court remedies by having presented

Case 1:06-cv-00669-OWW -SMS Document 3 Filed 06/26/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

U.S. District Court

 E. D. California 2

the claims to the California Supreme Court in a procedurally proper form and proved that his

direct appeal concerning the conviction being challenged has been ruled on by the California

Court of Appeal; 

3) Petitioner did not include in the petition only claims that allege violations of the Federal

Constitution;

4) Petitioner did not include in the petition only claims that are the proper subject matter for a

habeas petition; and

5) The petition is largely illegible.

ORDER

Accordingly, the instant petition is hereby DISMISSED. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to

enter judgment and terminate this action in its entirety.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 24, 2006 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger 

emm0d6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-00669-OWW -SMS Document 3 Filed 06/26/06 Page 2 of 2