Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-01421/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-01421-2/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Mitchell C. Beem
Plaintiff
Commissioner of Social Security
Defendant

Document Text:

-1- 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

Steven G. Rosales 

Attorney at Law: 222224 

Law Offices of Lawrence D. Rohlfing 

12631 East Imperial Highway, Suite C-115 

Santa Fe Springs, CA 90670 

Tel.: (562)868-5886 

Fax: (562)868-5491 

E-mail _steven.rosales@rohlfinglaw.com 

Attorneys for Plaintiff MITCHELL C. BEEM 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

MITCHELL C. BEEM, 

 Plaintiff, 

 vs. 

CAROLYN COLVIN, Acting 

Commissioner of Social Security, 

 Defendant 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

)

Case No.: 2:15-CV-01421-EFB 

AMENDED REQUEST TO MODIFY 

BRIEFING SCHEDULE 

TO THE HONORABLE EDMUND F. BRENNAN, MAGISTRATE 

JUDGE OF THE DISTRICT COURT: 

Plaintiff Mitchell C. Beem (“Plaintiff”) through his undersigned counsel of 

record, requests, subject to the approval of the Court, to extend the time for 

Plaintiff to file Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment or Remand to January 

21, 2016; and that Defendant shall have until February 22, 2016, to file her 

opposition. Any reply by plaintiff to be due March 10, 2016. 

Case 2:15-cv-01421-EFB Document 17 Filed 01/25/16 Page 1 of 3
-2- 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

A 2 day extension of time is needed because Counsel's Spouse underwent 

spinal surgery on January 8, 2016 to address a compression fracture of the spine at 

L1 related to tumor growth as a result of her stage 4 breast cancer. Counsel required 

the additional time to prepare and file the opening brief. 

Counsel notes that the modified briefing schedule continues to require any 

reply brief to be filed by the same March 10, 2016 date as previously set by this 

Court. Consequently, the modification results in a reduction of time for Counsel to 

prepare any reply and does not extend the time for this matter to be submitted to the 

Court for decision. 

 Counsel sincerely apologizes to the court for any inconvenience this may 

have had upon it or its staff. 

DATE: January 20, 2016 Respectfully submitted, 

 LAW OFFICES OF LAWRENCE D. ROHLFING 

 /s/ Steven G. Rosales 

 BY: _________________________ Steven G. Rosales Attorney for plaintiff MITCHELL C. BEEM 

Case 2:15-cv-01421-EFB Document 17 Filed 01/25/16 Page 2 of 3
-3- 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s request for an extension of time 

(ECF No. 14) is granted. Plaintiff’s motion filed on January 21, 2016 (ECF No. 

16) is deemed timely. Defendant shall file her cross-motion for summary 

judgment, if any, by February 22, 2016. Any reply by plaintiff continues to be due 

March 10, 2016. 

 IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: January 25, 2016. 

 _______________________________________ 

THE HONORABLE EDMUND F. BRENNAN 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

Case 2:15-cv-01421-EFB Document 17 Filed 01/25/16 Page 3 of 3