Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_20-cr-00013/USCOURTS-caed-2_20-cr-00013-5/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Mario Gonzalez
Defendant
USA
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1 STIPULATION REGARDING EXCLUDABLE TIME 

PERIODS UNDER SPEEDY TRIAL ACT

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

MCGREGOR W. SCOTT

United States Attorney

MICHAEL W. REDDING

Assistant United States Attorney

501 I Street, Suite 10-100

Sacramento, CA 95814

Telephone: (916) 554-2700

Facsimile: (916) 554-2900

Attorneys for Plaintiff

United States of America

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff,

 v.

MARIO GONZALEZ,

 Defendant.

CASE NO. 2:20-CR-13-WBS

STIPULATION REGARDING EXCLUDABLE 

TIME PERIODS UNDER SPEEDY TRIAL ACT; 

FINDINGS AND ORDER

DATE: August 3, 2020

TIME: 9:00 a.m.

COURT: Hon. William B. Shubb

STIPULATION

Plaintiff United States of America, by and through its counsel of record, and defendant, by and 

through defendant’s counsel of record, hereby stipulate as follows: 

1. By previous order, this matter was set for status on August 3, 2020. 

2. By this stipulation, defendant now moves to continue the status conference until October 

5, 2020, and to exclude time between August 3, 2020, and October 5, 2020, under Local Code T4. 

3. The parties agree and stipulate, and request that the Court find the following: 

a) The government has represented that the discovery associated with this case 

includes video/audio recordings and written reports. The government has provided extensive 

initial discovery in the form of these recordings and reports. However, the defendant has 

requested additional discovery, which the government is now producing.

b) Counsel for defendant desires additional time to review discovery, consult with 

Case 2:20-cr-00013-WBS Document 24 Filed 07/30/20 Page 1 of 3
2 STIPULATION REGARDING EXCLUDABLE TIME 

PERIODS UNDER SPEEDY TRIAL ACT

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

his client, research his criminal history, pursue further investigation, discuss possible resolution 

with the assigned AUSA and otherwise prepare for trial. 

c) Counsel for defendant believes that failure to grant the above-requested

continuance would deny him/her the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking 

into account the exercise of due diligence.

d) The government does not object to the continuance.

e) Based on the above-stated findings, the ends of justice served by continuing the 

case as requested outweigh the interest of the public and the defendant in a trial within the 

original date prescribed by the Speedy Trial Act. 

f) For the purpose of computing time under the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161, 

et seq., within which trial must commence, the time period of August 3, 2020 to October 5, 2020, 

inclusive, is deemed excludable pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 3161(h)(7)(A), B(iv) [Local Code T4] 

because it results from a continuance granted by the Court at defendant’s request on the basis of 

the Court’s finding that the ends of justice served by taking such action outweigh the best interest 

of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

//

//

//

//

//

//

//

//

//

//

//

//

//

Case 2:20-cr-00013-WBS Document 24 Filed 07/30/20 Page 2 of 3
3 STIPULATION REGARDING EXCLUDABLE TIME 

PERIODS UNDER SPEEDY TRIAL ACT

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

4. Nothing in this stipulation and order shall preclude a finding that other provisions of the 

Speedy Trial Act dictate that additional time periods are excludable from the period within which a trial 

must commence.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Dated: July 28, 2020 MCGREGOR W. SCOTT

United States Attorney

/s/ MICHAEL W. REDDING

MICHAEL W. REDDING

Assistant United States Attorney

Dated: July 28, 2020 /s/ Douglas Beevers

Douglas Beevers

Counsel for Defendant 

MARIO GONZALEZ

FINDINGS AND ORDER

IT IS SO FOUND AND ORDERED.

Dated: July 29, 2020

Case 2:20-cr-00013-WBS Document 24 Filed 07/30/20 Page 3 of 3