Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca13-14-01823/USCOURTS-ca13-14-01823-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
ConvaTec Technologies Inc.
Appellant
Smith & Nephew, Inc.
Appellee

Document Text:

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

CONVATEC TECHNOLOGIES INC.,

Appellant

v.

SMITH & NEPHEW, INC.,

Appellee

______________________ 

2014-1822, 2014-1823

______________________ 

Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. 

IPR2013-00097, IPR2013-00102. 

______________________ 

JUDGMENT

______________________ 

RICHARD TORCZON, Wilson, Sonsini, Goodrich & 

Rosati, PC, Washington, DC, argued for appellant. Also 

represented by JEFFREY WILLIAM GUISE, PETER R.

MUNSON, LORELEI PEREZ WESTIN, San Diego, CA.

BRADLEY THOMAS LENNIE, Hunton & Williams LLP, 

Washington, DC, argued for appellee. Also represented by 

JEFFREY B. VOCKRODT, CHRISTOPHER H. YAEN; DAVID A.

KELLY, Atlanta, GA.

Case: 14-1823 Document: 3-2 Page: 1 Filed: 08/10/2015
 

MONICA BARNES LATEEF, Office of the Solictor, United 

States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, 

argued for intervenor Michelle K. Lee. Also represented 

by NATHAN K. KELLEY, SCOTT WEIDENFELLER. 

______________________ 

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 

 PER CURIAM (CHEN, LINN, and HUGHES, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

August 10, 2015 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole 

 Date Daniel E. O’Toole 

 Clerk of Court

Case: 14-1823 Document: 3-2 Page: 2 Filed: 08/10/2015