Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_16-cv-02041/USCOURTS-cand-4_16-cv-02041-4/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Electronic Frontier Foundation
Plaintiff
United States Department of Justice
Defendant

Document Text:

16-CV-02041-HSG STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

MARK RUMOLD (SBN 279060) 

mark@eff.org 

NATHAN D. CARDOZO (SBN 259097) 

nate@eff.org 

AARON MACKEY (SBN 286647) 

amackey@eff.org 

ELECTRONIC FRONTIER FOUNDATION

815 Eddy Street 

San Francisco, CA 94109 

Telephone: (415) 436-9333 

Facsimile: (415) 436-9993 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

ELECTRONIC FRONTIER FOUNDATION 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

ELECTRONIC FRONTIER FOUNDATION, 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT 

OF JUSTICE, 

 Defendant. 

)

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

)

Case No. 16-cv-02041-HSG 

SECOND STIPULATION AND ORDER 

TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR FILING 

PLAINTIFF’S REPLY 

Case 4:16-cv-02041-HSG Document 38 Filed 11/28/16 Page 1 of 3
16-cv-02041-HSG STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 1

The parties stipulate and respectfully request the Court extend the deadline for filing 

Plaintiff’s Reply in Support of its Motion for Partial Summary Judgment until December 1, 2016. 

Good cause exists for this request as follows: 

1. On November 14, 2016, the parties sought, and the Court approved, a stipulated 

extension of time for the filing of Plaintiff’s Reply. See ECF No. 36. 

2. The parties sought this extension to accommodate discussions between the parties 

concerning the scope of the FOIA request, in an ongoing effort to narrow the scope of the litigation 

and partially resolve some of the areas in dispute without the Court’s intervention. See id. 

3. During the additional time, the parties have engaged in productive discussions 

concerning the proposed narrowing and its consequences for the litigation. However, because of the 

Thanksgiving holiday, the Department of Justice requires additional time to discuss the issue within 

the Department and with other affected government agencies. 

4. Thus, and to facilitate their ongoing discussions, the parties request an additional brief 

extension of three days, to December 1, 2016, for the filing of Plaintiff’s Reply. 

5. This short extension will allow the parties to complete their discussions concerning 

the proposed narrowing. In the event the parties are unable to resolve their dispute, the new deadline 

will still allow for two full weeks before the currently scheduled hearing date. 

Accordingly, the parties respectfully stipulate and request that the Court extend the deadline 

for filing Plaintiff’s Reply to December 1, 2016. 

DATED: November 23, 2016 /s/ Mark Rumold Mark Rumold 

ELECTRONIC FRONTIER FOUNDATION 

815 Eddy Street 

San Francisco, CA 94109 

Telephone: (415) 436-9333 

Facsimile: (415) 436-9993 

Attorney for Plaintiff 

ELECTRONIC FRONTIER FOUNDATION 

Case 4:16-cv-02041-HSG Document 38 Filed 11/28/16 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

16-cv-0204

P

Rodney 

documen

I 

true and 

U

file Plain

O

DATED:

 

DATED

41-HSG 

DE

ursuant to C

Patton, coun

nt. 

declare und

correct. Exe

Upon conside

ntiff’s Reply,

ORDERED t

: November

 

: November

ST

ECLARAT

Civil L.R. 5-

nsel for Def

der penalty o

ecuted this 2

eration of th

, it is: 

that Plaintiff

r 28, 2016 

 

 

r 23, 2016 

TIPULATION 

ION PURS

-1(i)(3), I, M

fendant, Un

of perjury un

23rd day of N

*

he parties’ s

f’s deadline 

BEN

 Pri

 BR

 Un

 EL

 De

 _/s

 RO

 Sen

 JU

 Tri

 Un

 Civ

 20 

 Wa

 Te

 Fa

Atto

AND [PROPO

2

UANT TO 

Mark Rumold

nited States 

nder the law

November, 2

/s/ Mark Ru

Mark Ru

*

stipulation co

to file its Re

__________

HON. HAY

UNITED ST

NJAMIN C

incipal Depu

RIAN STRE

nited States A

LIZABETH J

eputy Branch

/s/ Rodney Pa

ODNEY PAT

nior Counse

ULIA A. BER

ial Attorney

nited States D

vil Division,

Massachuse

ashington, D

lephone: (20

csimile: (20

orneys for D

OSED] ORDER

LOCAL RU

d, declare th

Department 

ws of the Un

2016 in Kans

umold

Rumold

* 

oncerning a

eply is exten

__________

YWOOD S. G

TATES DIS

. MIZER

uty Assistant

ETCH 

Attorney 

J. SHAPIRO

h Director

Patton______

TTON 

el 

RMAN Bar N

Department 

, Federal Pro

etts Avenue,

D.C. 20001

02) 616-848

02) 616-8470

Defendant 

R

ULE 5-1(I)(

hat I obtaine

of Justice, 

nited States 

sas City, Mi

an extension 

nded to Dece

___________

GILLIAM, J

STRICT JUD

t Attorney G

O

_______ 

No. 241415 

of Justice 

ograms Bran

, N.W. 

0 

0

(3) 

d the concu

in the filin

that the fore

ssouri. 

of time in 

ember 1, 201

__________

JR. 

DGE 

General 

nch 

urrence of 

ng of this 

egoing is 

which to 

16. 

__ 

Case 4:16-cv-02041-HSG Document 38 Filed 11/28/16 Page 3 of 3