Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-4_05-cr-00115/USCOURTS-azd-4_05-cr-00115-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Ociel Castillo
Defendant
United States of America
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 

 

Plaintiff(s),

vs.

 

OCIEL CASTILLO, 

 Defendant(s).

)

) NO. CR 05-115-TUC-FRZ (GEE)

) 

) ORDER

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

This matter was referred to the United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

§636(b)(1)(B) and the local rules of practice of this Court for an evidentiary hearing and

report and recommendation on the Petition to Revoke Defendant's Supervised Release.

Defendant and his counsel consented in writing to proceed before the Magistrate Judge.

On November 28, 2007, December 11, 2007, and December 17, 2007, Magistrate

Judge Glenda E. Edmonds conducted evidentiary hearings and on March 31, 2008 issued

her Report and Recommendation. [65] A copy was sent to all parties. Defendant filed

Objections to Magistrate Report and Recommendation on April 16, 2008.[68] The

Government filed a Response to the Objections on May 14, 2008.[76] Defendant filed a

reply to the Government's Response on May 15, 2008.[77]

The Court, having made a de novo review of the record herein, orders as follows:

/////

/////

Case 4:05-cr-00115-FRZ-GEE Document 78 Filed 05/30/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

IT IS ORDERED that Defendant's Objections to Magistrate Judge Edmonds' Report

and Recommendation are DENIED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Edmonds' Report and

Recommendation is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED by this Court as the findings of fact and

conclusions of law in this matter.

IT IS THE FINDINGS AND ORDER of the Court that Defendant violated the

conditions of his supervised release as stated in Allegation C of the Petition to Revoke his

Supervised Release.

IT IS FURTHER THE FINDINGS AND ORDER of the Court that Allegations A and

B of the Petition to Revoke Defendant's Supervised Release be DISMISSED.

DATED this 29th day of May, 2008.

Case 4:05-cr-00115-FRZ-GEE Document 78 Filed 05/30/08 Page 2 of 2