Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_11-cv-01271/USCOURTS-caed-1_11-cv-01271-7/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Nicholas Hart
Plaintiff
Kenneth Hockett
Defendant
Darlene Hutchins
Defendant
Brian Machado
Defendant
Benjamin C. Oyarzo
Plaintiff
Toney Powers
Defendant
Tuolumne Fire District
Defendant
Tuolumne Fire Protection District
Defendant
Joseph Turner
Defendant

Document Text:

Page 1

Stipulation To Dismiss Defendant Brian Machado

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

MAYALL HURLEY

A Professional Corporation

2453 Grand Canal Boulevard, Second Floor

Stockton, California 95207-8253

Telephone (209) 477-3833

J. ANTHONY ABBOTT, ESQ.

CA State Bar No. 083975

JOHANNE C. MEDINA, ESQ.

CA State Bar No. 258973

Attorneys for Defendants, 

TUOLUMNE FIRE DISTRICT, JOSEPH TURNER,

DARLENE HUTCHINS, KENNETH HOCKETT, 

And BRIAN MACHADO

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT

BENJAMIN C. OYARZO AND NICHOLAS 

HART,

Plaintiff,

vs.

TUOLUMNE FIRE DISTRICT (A.K.A. 

“TUOLUMNE FIRE PROTECTION 

DISTRICT”), JOSEPH TURNER, in his 

individual and official capacities, 

KENNETH HOCKETT, in his individual 

and official capacities, DARLENE 

HUTCHINS, in her individual and official 

capacities, , BRIAN MACHADO, in his 

individual and official capacities, TONEY 

POWERS, in his official and official 

capacities, and DOES 1 through 20, 

inclusive,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No: 1:11-cv-01271-LJO-SAB

STIPULATION TO DISMISS 

DEFENDANT BRIAN MACHADO; 

ORDER

Plaintiffs BENJAMIN C. OYARZO and NICHOLAS HART, and defendant BRIAN 

MACHADO, by and between their respective attorneys of record, hereby agree and stipulate as 

follows:

1. The Amended Complaint of plaintiffs BENJAMIN C. OYARZO and NICHOLAS 

HART shall be dismissed with prejudice as to defendant BRIAN MACHADO only.

2. Defendant BRIAN MACHADO waives any and all rights he may have to recover 

Case 1:11-cv-01271-SAB Document 64 Filed 04/19/13 Page 1 of 3
Page 2

Stipulation To Dismiss Defendant Brian Machado

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

attorney’s fees or costs of suit incurred in the defense of this matter from plaintiffs BENJAMIN 

C. OYARZO or NICHOLAS HART.

3. Plaintiffs BENJAMIN C. OYARZO and NICHOLAS HART, and defendant 

BRIAN MACHADO shall execute a mutual general release of all claims.

4. Defendant BRIAN MACHADO agrees to accept service by mail on his present 

counsel of record of a trial subpoena issued by counsel for BENJAMIN C. OYARZO and

NICHOLAS HART.

5. The court may retain jurisdiction for purposes of enforcing this stipulation and order.

DATED: April 18, 2013 SEIBERT & BAUTISTA

By__/s/ Shannon Seibert____________________

SHANNON SEIBERT, Attorney for Plaintffs

DATED: April 18, 2013 MAYALL HURLEY, P.C.

By____/s/ J. Anthony Abbott______________

J. ANTHONY ABBOTT, Attorney for Defendants

ORDER

The stipulation of the parties having been considered, and good cause appearing therefor,

IT IS ORDERED:

1. The Amended Complaint of plaintiffs BENJAMIN C. OYARZO and NICHOLAS 

HART be and is hereby dismissed with prejudice as to defendant BRIAN MACHADO only.

2. Defendant BRIAN MACHADO shall not recover attorney’s fees or costs of suit 

incurred in the defense of this matter from plaintiffs BENJAMIN C. OYARZO or NICHOLAS 

HART.

3. Plaintiffs BENJAMIN C. OYARZO and NICHOLAS HART, and defendant 

BRIAN MACHADO shall execute a mutual general release of all claims.

Case 1:11-cv-01271-SAB Document 64 Filed 04/19/13 Page 2 of 3
Page 3

Stipulation To Dismiss Defendant Brian Machado

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

4. Defendant BRIAN MACHADO shall accept service by mail on his present 

counsel of record of a trial subpoena issued by counsel for BENJAMIN C. OYARZO and 

NICHOLAS HART.

5. The court retains jurisdiction for purposes of enforcing this stipulation and order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 18, 2013 /s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE DEAC_Signature-END:

66h44d

Case 1:11-cv-01271-SAB Document 64 Filed 04/19/13 Page 3 of 3