Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca8-09-02970/USCOURTS-ca8-09-02970-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Scott Brocail
Appellant
United States of America
Appellee

Document Text:

1

The Honorable Jimm Larry Hendren, Chief Judge, United States District Court

for the Western District of Arkansas. 

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 09-2970

___________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* Western District of Arkansas.

Scott Brocail, *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellant. *

___________

Submitted: January 15, 2010

Filed: January 25, 2010

___________

Before WOLLMAN, COLLOTON, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

In this appeal following revocation of his supervised release, Scott Brocail

challenges the district court’s1

 revocation sentence, arguing that it is unreasonable and

does not reflect proper consideration of the sentencing factors listed in 18 U.S.C.

§ 3553(a). Upon careful review, we conclude that the revocation sentence is not

unreasonable. See United States v. Tyson, 413 F.3d 824, 825 (per curiam) (standard

of review). The sentence is within the statutory limits of 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e) and the

range recommended by the Sentencing Guidelines, see United States v. Perkins, 526

Appellate Case: 09-2970 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/25/2010 Entry ID: 3627246
-2-

F.3d 1107, 1110 (revocation sentence within Guidelines range is accorded

presumption of substantive reasonableness on appeal), and the record reflects that the

district court considered and applied appropriate section 3553(a) factors, see id.

(district court need not make specific findings on § 3553(a) factors).

Accordingly, we affirm, and we grant counsel leave to withdraw.

______________________________

Appellate Case: 09-2970 Page: 2 Date Filed: 01/25/2010 Entry ID: 3627246