Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_24-cv-01252/USCOURTS-caed-1_24-cv-01252-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Ur Jaddou
Defendant
Manpreet Singh
Plaintiff
USCIS
Defendant

Document Text:

1 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

PHILLIP A. TALBERT 

United States Attorney 

ELLIOT C. WONG 

Assistant United States Attorney 

501 I Street, Suite 10-100 

Sacramento, CA 95814 

Telephone: (916) 554-2700 

Facsimile: (916) 554-2900 

Attorneys for Defendants 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

MANPREET SINGH, 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

UR JADDOU, ET AL., 

 Defendants. 

CASE NO. 1:24-CV-01252-JLT-SKO 

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR FIRST 

EXTENSION OF TIME 

(Doc. 8) 

The Defendants respectfully request a first extension of time in which to respond to the 

complaint, and counsel for Plaintiff does not oppose. In this case, Plaintiff alleges that U.S. Citizenship 

and Immigration Services (“USCIS”) has unreasonably delayed scheduling an interview on his pending 

asylum application, which he filed in 2017. USCIS has scheduled Plaintiff’s asylum interview for April 

15, 2025. The parties anticipate that this lawsuit will be rendered moot once USCIS completes its 

adjudication of Plaintiff’s application, and USCIS anticipates it will do so within 120 days following the 

successful complete of Plaintiff’s asylum interview. In the event USCIS cancels or reschedules the 

interview on Plaintiff’s application, the agency will endeavor to reschedule the interview within four 

weeks of the original date. 

/ / / 

Case 1:24-cv-01252-JLT-SKO Document 9 Filed 12/16/24 Page 1 of 2
2 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

The parties therefore stipulate that the new date for Defendants to file an answer or other 

dispositive pleading is August 13, 2025. The parties further request that all other filing deadlines be 

similarly extended, and that the initial status conference currently scheduled for January 28, 2025, be 

vacated and reset. 

Respectfully submitted, 

Dated: December 12, 2024 

By: 

PHILLIP A. TALBERT 

United States Attorney 

/s/ ELLIOT C. WONG 

 ELLIOT C. WONG 

Assistant United States Attorney 

/s/ JESSICA T. ARENA 

Dated: December 12, 2024 Jessica T. Arena

Counsel for Plaintiff 

 

ORDER 

 Based on the foregoing stipulation of the parties (Doc. 8), and for good cause shown, it is 

hereby ORDERED that: 

1. Defendants SHALL respond to the complaint by no later than August 13, 2025; and 

2. The Initial Scheduling Conference, currently set for January 28, 2025, is CONTINUED 

to September 30, 2025, at 9:30 a.m. before Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto. The 

parties SHALL file their joint scheduling report 7 days prior to the conference. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: December 13, 2024 /s/ Sheila K. Oberto .

 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

Case 1:24-cv-01252-JLT-SKO Document 9 Filed 12/16/24 Page 2 of 2