Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_13-cv-02506/USCOURTS-caed-2_13-cv-02506-3/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Horowitz
Defendant
Richard Peacock
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RICHARD PEACOCK,

Plaintiff,

v.

HOROWITZ,

Defendant.

No. 2:13-cv-2506 TLN AC P

ORDER

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief 

under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 

28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On February 18, 2015, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 

which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to 

the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. (ECF No. 22.) 

Defendant has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this 

Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the 

Court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper 

analysis.

/////

Case 2:13-cv-02506-TLN-AC Document 24 Filed 03/31/15 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed February 18, 2015, are adopted in full; and

2. The Motion to Dismiss filed by Defendant Horowitz (ECF No. 16) is denied.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 31, 2015

Case 2:13-cv-02506-TLN-AC Document 24 Filed 03/31/15 Page 2 of 2