Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca10-91-01035/USCOURTS-ca10-91-01035-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Lou Hesse
Appellee
Samuel V. Martinez
Appellant
Gale A. Norton
Appellee

Document Text:

FILED 

United States C.Ourt of Appoola Tcnt.'i Circuit 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

TENTH CIRCUIT 

SAMUEL V. MARTINEZ, ) 

SEP O 4 1991 

ROBERT L. HOECKER 

Clerk 

) 

Petitioner-Appellant, ) 

) 

v. ) 

) 

LOU HESSE; GALE A. NORTON, ) 

Attorney General for the State of ) 

Colorado, ) 

) 

Respondents-Appellees. ) 

No. 91-1035 

(D.C. No. 90-M-1036) 

( D. Colo.) 

ORDER AND JUDGMENT* 

Before McKAY, SEYMOUR, and EBEL, Circuit Judges. 

After examining the briefs, this panel has determined 

unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the 

determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th 

Cir. R. 34.1.9. Therefore, the case is ordered submitted without 

oral argument. 

For the reasons stated in the District Court's Order of 

January 2, 1991, including the Recommendation by U.S. Magistrate 

filed October 2, 1990, we AFFIRM. ** The mandate shall issue forthwith . 

* 

Entered for the Court: 

David M. Ebel 

Circuit Judge 

This order and judgment has no precedential value and shall not 

be cited, or used by any court within the Tenth Circuit, except 

for purposes of establishing the doctrines of the law of the case, 

res judicata, or collateral estoppel. 10th Cir. R. 36.3. 

** Appellant's Motion for a Certificate of Probable Cause is 

granted. However, once appellant's appeal is considered on the 

merits, the order of the district court is affirmed. 

Appellate Case: 91-1035 Document: 010110084269 Date Filed: 09/04/1991 Page: 1