Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-04599/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-04599-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Jamal Anthony Pritchett
Plaintiff
Nathan G. Siegel
Defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JAMAL ANTHONY PRITCHETT,

Plaintiff,

v.

NATHAN G. SIEGEL,

Defendant.

Case No. 16-cv-04599-JSC 

ORDER DISMISSING COMPLAINT

WITHOUT PREJUDICE

Re: Dkt. No. 1

Plaintiff Jamal Anthony Pritchett, proceeding pro se, filed the instant complaint against 

Defendant Nathan G. Siegel for claims of misrepresentation and negligence arising from 

Defendant’s failure to maintain habitable premises for Plaintiff. (Dkt. No. 1.) Plaintiff has

consented to the jurisdiction of a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). (Dkt. No. 3.) 

As Plaintiff is proceeding in forma pauperis, the Court previously reviewed Plaintiff’s 

complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 and dismissed the complaint with leave to amend because 

it failed to establish a basis for subject matter jurisdiction. (Dkt. No. 5.) Although Plaintiff had 

until September 30, 2016 to file an amended complaint correcting any pleading defects, he has 

failed to do so. Accordingly, the Court ORDERS that Plaintiff’s complaint be DISMISSED 

without prejudice to Plaintiff pursuing his claims in state court.

The Clerk is directed to close the file.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 6, 2016

JACQUELINE SCOTT CORLEY

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:16-cv-04599-JSC Document 6 Filed 10/06/16 Page 1 of 1