Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_09-cv-02641/USCOURTS-caed-2_09-cv-02641-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Commissioner of Social Security
Defendant
Pamela J. Ortiz
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

BESS M. BREWER, #100364

LAW OFFICE OF 

BESS M. BREWER & ASSOCIATES

P.O. Box 5088

Sacramento, CA 95817

Telephone: (916) 454-3111

Facsimile: (916) 454-3131

Attorneys for Plaintiff

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

PAMELA J. ORTIZ ) Case No. 09-cv-02641-KJN

) 

)

)

) [PROPOSED] STIPULATION AND ORDER

Plaintiff, ) EXTENDING PLAINTIFF’S TIME TO

) FILE MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT

v. ) OF SUMMARY JUDGMENT 

)

MICHAEL J. ASTRUE )

Commissioner of Social Security )

of the United States of America, )

)

Defendant. )

)

 )

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties, through their attorneys, and with the

permission of the Court as evidenced below, that the Plaintiff’s time to file the summary judgment in

this case is hereby extended from April 26, 2010, to May 28, 2010. This is plaintiff’s first request for

an extension and it is required due to Plaintiff’s counsel’s impacted briefing schedule. 

////

////

////

////

////

Case 2:09-cv-02641-KJN Document 17 Filed 04/29/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Dated: April 26, 2010 /s/Bess M. Brewer 

BESS M. BREWER

Attorney at Law

Attorney for Plaintiff

Dated: April 27, 2010 Benjamin B. Wagner

United States Attorney

/s/ Leslie Alexander 

 LESLIE ALEXANDER

Special Assistant U.S. Attorney

Social Security Administration

Attorney for Defendant

ORDER

Pursuant to the parties’ stipulation, plaintiff shall file a motion for summary

judgment, if any, on or before May 28, 2010. The court’s scheduling order shall be amended

accordingly.

Plaintiff will not be granted further extensions of time to file a motion for summary

judgment absent a showing of good cause. The undersigned recognizes the burden on counsel to

manage an active case load and prepare motions for summary judgment in fact-intensive cases such

as this one. Nevertheless, plaintiff’s reliance on her attorney’s impacted briefing schedule as the

basis for any further request for an extension of time will not necessarily constitute, by itself, good

cause for such an extension. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: April 28, 2010

_____________________________________

KENDALL J. NEWMAN

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:09-cv-02641-KJN Document 17 Filed 04/29/10 Page 2 of 2