Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_16-cv-00358/USCOURTS-caed-1_16-cv-00358-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Carniceria Zapatlan
Defendant
Andrea Delacruz
Defendant
Rafael Delacruz
Defendant
Baljinder Kaur Dhaliwal
Defendant
Balwant Singh Dhaliwal
Defendant
Jose Trujillo
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Tanya E. Moore, SBN 206683

MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C.

332 North Second Street

San Jose, California 95112

Telephone (408) 298-2000

Facsimile (408) 298-6046

Email: service@moorelawfirm.com

Attorney for Plaintiff

Jose Trujillo

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOSE TRUJILLO,

Plaintiff,

vs.

RAFAEL DELACRUZ, et al.,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. 1:16-cv-00358-DAD-SAB

STIPULATION FOR FURTHER 

EXTENSION OF TIME FOR 

RESPONSIVE PLEADINGS AND 

CONTINUANCE OF MANDATORY 

SCHEDULING CONFERENCE; ORDER

WHEREAS, a Mandatory Scheduling Conference in this action is currently set for May 

31, 2016, pursuant to the Court’s Order dated March 15, 2016 (Dkt. 3-1);

WHEREAS, Plaintiff, Jose Trujillo (“Plaintiff”), and Defendants, Rafael Delacruz, 

Andrea Delacruz, Balwant Singh Dhaliwal dba Carniceria Zapatlan, and Baljinder Kaur 

Dhaliwal dba Carniceria Zapatlan (“Defendants,” and together with Plaintiff, “the Parties”) 

previously stipulated to an extension of time for Defendants’ responsive pleadings such that the 

responsive pleadings were due on May 11, 2016;

WHEREAS, the Parties are engaging in settlement discussions and wish to exhaust such 

efforts before incurring the fees and costs associated with responsive pleadings and the 

Scheduling Conference, and to conserve Court resources;

Case 1:16-cv-00358-DAD-SAB Document 10 Filed 05/24/16 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

NOW, THEREFORE, Plaintiff and Defendants, by and through their respective counsel, 

stipulate to a continuance of the Mandatory Scheduling Conference currently set for May 31, 

2016 to a date at the Court’s convenience after July 29, 2016, and to a further extension of time 

for Defendants’ responsive pleadings such that they be due on July 15, 2016.

Dated: May 24, 2016 MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C.

/s/ Tanya E. Moore

 Tanya E. Moore

Attorney for Plaintiff, 

Jose Trujillo

Dated: May 24, 2016 /s/ Bruce A. Neilson

Bruce A. Neilson

Attorney for Defendants,

Rafael Delacruz, Andrea Delacruz, Balwant Singh 

Dhaliwal dba Carniceria Zapatlan, and Baljinder 

Kaur Dhaliwal dba Carniceria Zapatlan

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 24, 2016 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:16-cv-00358-DAD-SAB Document 10 Filed 05/24/16 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

The parties having so stipulated and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Mandatory Scheduling Conference currently set for 

May 31, 2016 is continued to August 9, 2016 at 3:30 p.m. before Magistrate Judge Stanley A. 

Boone. The parties are to file their Joint Scheduling Report no later than seven days prior to the 

conference. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants shall file their responsive pleadings on or 

before July 15, 2016.

Case 1:16-cv-00358-DAD-SAB Document 10 Filed 05/24/16 Page 3 of 3