Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-04257/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-04257-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Cobra Technologies Corp.
Defendant
Cobra Technologies International, Inc.
Defendant
Robert M. Katter
Defendant
Pipeline Observation System Management (POSM)
Defendant
R.S. Technical Services, Inc.
Defendant
James W. Raulston
Plaintiff
Robert C. Soltysik
Plaintiff
Subcam, Inc.
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANT COBRA

TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION TO ANSWER; ORDER

C06-04257-CRBı

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

John V. Picone III (SBN 187226/picone@fr.com)

FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.

500 Arguello Street, Suite 500

Redwood City, CA 94063

Telephone: (650) 839-5070

Facsimile: (650) 839-5071

Attorneys for Defendant

COBRA TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

SUBCAM, INC., a Florida corporation;

JAMES W. RAULSTON, an individual,; and

ROBERT C. SOLTYSIK, an individual,

Plaintiffs,

v.

COBRA TECHNOLOGIES CORP., a Georgia

corporation; COBRA TECHNOLOGIES

INTERNATIONAL, INC., a Delaware

corporation; PIPELINE OBSERVATION

SYSTEM MANAGEMENT (POSM), an

unknown entity; ROBERT M. KATTER, an

individual; and R.S. TECHNICAL SERVICES,

INC. a California corporation,

Defendants.

C06-04257-CRB

STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME FOR

DEFENDANT COBRA TECHNOLOGIES

CORPORATION TO ANSWER OR

OTHERWISE RESPOND TO

COMPLAINT; [PROPOSED] ORDER

IT APPEARING THAT Defendant COBRA TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION

(“COBRA”) was served with the Summons and Complaint in this matter on or about September 1,

2006;

AND IT FURTHER APPEARING THAT Plaintiffs and COBRA agree and consent to

extend the deadline by which COBRA may answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiffs’ Complaint;

Case 3:06-cv-04257-CRB Document 9 Filed 09/22/06 Page 1 of 3
2

STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANT COBRA

TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION TO ANSWER; ORDER

C06-04257-CRBı

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED THAT, pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-1(a), the date by which

COBRA may answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiffs’ Complaint is hereby extended through

and including October 20, 2006.

Dated: September 20, 2006 Law Offices of Henry Harmeling IV, APC

By: \s\ Henry Harmeling IV

Henry Harmeling IV

Attorney for Plaintiffs

Pursuant to General Order 45, Section X(B) regarding signatures, I attest under penalty of

perjury that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from Henry

Harmeling IV.

Dated: September 20, 2006 FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.

By: \s\ John V. Picone III

John V. Picone III

Attorneys for Defendant

COBRA TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION

Dated: September 20, 2006 FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.

By: \s\ John V. Picone III

John V. Picone III

Attorneys for Defendant

COBRA TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION

Case 3:06-cv-04257-CRB Document 9 Filed 09/22/06 Page 2 of 3
3

STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANT COBRA

TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION TO ANSWER; ORDER

C06-04257-CRBı

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: ______________, 2006

Hon. Charles R. Breyer

Judge of the United States District Court

50372943.doc

September 22

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Charles R. Breyer

Case 3:06-cv-04257-CRB Document 9 Filed 09/22/06 Page 3 of 3