Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-01566/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-01566-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Charles DeRosa
Respondent
Roberto Quinto Soto-Angulo
Petitioner

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ROBERTO QUINTO SOTO-ANGULO, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

)

v. )

)

)

CHARLES DeROSA, )

)

Respondent. )

 )

1:07-cv-01566-AWI-TAG HC

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATION

(Doc. 3)

ORDER DISMISSING PETITION FOR WRIT

OF HABEAS CORPUS

(Doc. 1)

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO

ENTER JUDGMENT

Petitioner is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. 

On November 14, 2007, the Magistrate Judge assigned to the case filed a Findings and

Recommendation recommending that the petition for writ of habeas corpus be DISMISSED because

the Petition does not allege grounds that would entitle Petitioner to relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. 

(Doc. 3). The Findings and Recommendation was served on all parties and contained notice that any

objections were to be filed within twenty days from the date of service of that order. To date, the

parties in this case have not filed objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and

Recommendations.

Case 1:07-cv-01566-AWI-TAG Document 5 Filed 01/17/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a de

novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court concludes that the

Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation is supported by the record and proper analysis. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendation issued November 14, 2007 (Doc. 3), is ADOPTED IN

FULL; 

2. The petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. 1) is DISMISSED; and

3. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to ENTER JUDGMENT for Respondent and close the

file.

This order terminates the action in its entirety.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 17, 2008 /s/ Anthony W. Ishii 

0m8i78 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:07-cv-01566-AWI-TAG Document 5 Filed 01/17/08 Page 2 of 2