Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_14-cv-00826/USCOURTS-caed-1_14-cv-00826-2/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Centex Homes
Defendant
Centex Real Estate Corporation
Defendant
Fidelity and Guaranty Insurance Company
Plaintiff
Travelers Property Casualty Company of America
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

CASE NO: 1:14−CV−00826−LJO−GSA

ORDER ON JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINES SET IN INITIAL SCHEDULING 

ORDER 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

THE AGUILERA LAW GROUP, APLC

A. Eric Aguilera, Esq. (SBN 192390)

Raymond E. Brown, Esq. (SBN 164819)

Jason Y. Chao, Esq. (SBN 250735)

Angela N. Martin, Esq. (SBN 238426)

650 Town Center Drive, Suite 100

Costa Mesa, CA 92626

T: 714-384-6600 / F: 714-384-6601

eaguilera@aguileragroup.com

rbrown@aguileragroup.com

jchao@aguileragroup.com

amartin@aguileragroup.com

Attorneys for Plaintiffs, FIDELITY AND GUARANTY INSURANCE COMPANY, and 

TRAVELERS PROPERTY CASUALTY COMPANY OF AMERICA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – FRESNO DIVISION

FIDELITY AND GUARANTY INSURANCE 

COMPANY, an Iowa corporation; and 

TRAVELERS PROPERTY CASUALTY 

COMPANY OF AMERICA, a Connecticut 

corporation

Plaintiffs, 

v.

CENTEX HOMES, a Nevada general 

partnership, CENTEX REAL ESTATE 

CORPORATION, a Nevada corporation; and 

DOES 1 through 10 inclusive,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 1:14-cv-00826-LGO-GSA

ORDER ON JOINT STIPULATION TO 

EXTEND DEADLINES SET IN INITIAL 

SCHEDULING ORDER 

(ECF No. 58)

Case 1:14-cv-00826-DAD-EPG Document 59 Filed 09/15/15 Page 1 of 2
2

CASE NO: 1:14−CV−00826−LJO−GSA

ORDER ON JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINES SET IN INITIAL SCHEDULING 

ORDER 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

After a review of the Joint Stipulation to Extend Deadlines filed by the parties (ECF No. 58) 

and the procedural posture of this case, the Court finds good cause to continue the date set for the 

Non-expert Discovery Cutoff in the Court’s Scheduling Conference Order (ECF No. 51) from 

November 4, 2015 to December 21, 2015. 

However, based on the pending discovery motions in this action and the procedural posture 

of the cases related to this action, the Court does not find good cause to continue the other dates in 

the Scheduling Order as requested in the Stipulation. All other deadlines in the Scheduling Order 

will therefore remain as previously set.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 15, 2015 /s/ Gary S. Austin 

 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:14-cv-00826-DAD-EPG Document 59 Filed 09/15/15 Page 2 of 2