Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-01477/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-01477-4/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Roderick Washington
Petitioner
J. Woodford
Respondent

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RODERICK WASHINGTON,

Petitioner,

v.

J. WOODFORD,

Respondent.

 /

CV F 05-1477 OWW DLB HC

ORDER REGARDING PETITIONER’S

MOTION REGARDING PAYMENT OF

FILING FEE AND 

[Doc. 7]

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. 

On May 22, 2006, the Court denied Petitioner’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis

finding that Petitioner had sufficient funds to pay the $5.00 filing fee for this action, and

Petitioner was directed to pay the filing fee within thirty days from the date of service. (Court

Doc. 9.) 

On June 8, 2006, Petitioner filed a motion entitled “Petitioner’s Motion Paying Filings In

Response To Court Order Dated 5/22/06.” (Court Doc. 10.) Petitioner states his application to

proceed in forma pauperis previously filed in this case demonstrates that Petitioner attempted to

send $90.00 check for payment of the filing fee for his actions filed in this Court on April 11,

2006. However, examination of the application to proceed in forma pauperis, filed May 15, 2006

and attached to instant motion, does not support Petitioner’s contention as it merely indicates that

there $90.00 was withdrawn from Petitioner’s account. There is no indication as to the purpose

Case 1:05-cv-01477-OWW -DLB Document 12 Filed 11/16/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

of the money or where the money went, nor has the Court received the $5.00 filing fee in this

action. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:

1. Petitioner is granted an additional thirty (30) days from the date of service of this

order, to submit the $5.00 filing fee for this action; and

2. Failure to comply with this order will result in the action be dismissed for failure

to comply with a court order. Local Rule 11-110 IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: November 15, 2006 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger 

emm0d6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:05-cv-01477-OWW -DLB Document 12 Filed 11/16/06 Page 2 of 2