Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-01071/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-01071-2/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Cole Bartiromo
Petitioner
Bernie Ellis
Respondent

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

COLE BARTIROMO, )

)

)

Petitioner, )

)

v. )

)

)

BERNIE ELLIS, )

)

)

Respondent. )

)

 )

1:05-cv-01071-OWW-TAG HC 

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND

RECOMMENDATION (Doc. 6)

ORDER DISMISSING PETITION FOR WRIT

OF HABEAS CORPUS (Doc. 1)

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT

TO ENTER JUDGMENT

On August 23, 2005, Petitioner filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 2241 in this Court.

On December 8, 2005, the Magistrate Judge assigned to the case filed a Report and

Recommendation recommending the petition for writ of habeas corpus be dismissed because of

Petitioner’s failure to prosecute and follow orders of the Court. (Doc. 6). This Report and

Recommendation was served on all parties and contained notice that any objections were to be

filed within thirty days from the date of service of that order. To date, the parties have not filed

timely objections to the Report and Recommendation.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted

a de novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court concludes that

Case 1:05-cv-01071-OWW -TAG Document 7 Filed 06/26/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation is supported by the record and proper

analysis. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Report and Recommendation, filed December 8, 2005 (Doc. 6), is

ADOPTED IN FULL;

2. This petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. 1), is DISMISSED; and

3. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to ENTER JUDGMENT and close the file. 

This order terminates the action in its entirety. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 24, 2006 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger 

emm0d6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:05-cv-01071-OWW -TAG Document 7 Filed 06/26/06 Page 2 of 2