Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_10-cv-02203/USCOURTS-cand-4_10-cv-02203-2/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Yoichi Hariguchi
Counter-defendant
Integrated Device Technology, Inc.
Counter-claimant
Netlogic Microsystems, Inc.
Counter-claimant

Document Text:

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

4:10-cv-02203-SBA -1- JOINT STIPULATION 

STUART C. CLARK (SBN 124152)

clark@carrferrell.com 

CHRISTINE S. WATSON (SBN 218006) 

cwatson@carrferrell.com 

CARR & FERRELL LLP

2200 Geng Road 

Palo Alto, California 94303 

Telephone: (650) 812-3400 

Facsimile: (650) 812-3444 

Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterclaim 

Defendant YOICHI HARIGUCHI 

H. MARK LYON (SBN 162061) 

MLyon@gibsondunn.com 

STUART M. ROSENBERG (SBN 239926) 

SRosenberg@gibsondunn.com 

GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP

1881 Page Mill Road 

Palo Alto, California 94304 

Telephone: (650) 849-5300 

Facsimile: (650) 849-5333 

Attorneys for Defendants and Counterclaimants 

NETLOGIC MICROSYSTEMS, INC., and 

INTEGRATED DEVICE TECHNOLOGY, INC. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

OAKLAND DIVISION 

YOICHI HARIGUCHI, an individual,

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

NETLOGIC MICROSYSTEMS, INC., a 

Delaware corporation, and 

INTEGRATED DEVICE TECHNOLOGY, 

INC., a Delaware corporation, 

 Defendants. 

Case No. 4:10-cv-02203-SBA 

JOINT STIPULATION AND 

ORDER 

AND RELATED CROSS ACTION 

 

Case 4:10-cv-02203-SBA Document 38 Filed 01/05/11 Page 1 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

4:10-cv-02203-SBA -2- JOINT STIPULATION 

 Pursuant to Local Rule 6-2, Plaintiff Yoichi Hariguchi (“Hariguchi”) and Defendants 

NetLogic Microsystems, Inc. (“NetLogic”) and Integrated Device Technology, Inc. (“IDT”), by 

and through their respective counsel, hereby agree and stipulate to short extensions of certain 

deadlines set by the Court’s September 14, 2009 Case Management Scheduling Order, as shown 

below: 

Event Current Deadline 

(per 9/14/09 Order) 

Revised Deadline 

Disclosure of Asserted Claims and 

Infringement Contentions (PLR 3-1) 

Friday, November 19, 2010 Wednesday, January 12, 

2011 

Invalidity Contentions (PLR 3-3) Friday, January 7, 2011 Friday, January 28, 2011 

Exchange of Proposed Terms for 

Construction (PLR 4-1) 

Friday, January 21, 2011 Friday, February 11, 2011 

Exchange of Preliminary Claim 

Constructions and Extrinsic 

Evidence (PLR 4-2) 

Friday, February 11, 2011 Friday, February 25, 2011 

Joint Claim Construction and 

Prehearing Statement (PLR 4-3) 

Tuesday, March 8, 2011 Tuesday, March 22, 2011 

The parties request these short extensions because they disagree about whether the 

infringement contentions already served by Hariguchi on November 19, 2010 meet the 

requirements of Patent Local Rule 3-1, and rather than burden the Court with that issue at this time, 

the parties have agreed that Hariguchi will serve supplemental infringement contentions in early 

January so that the parties can continue to try to resolve the issue informally. The parties also agree 

that short extensions to the next few Patent Local Rule deadlines are warranted in light of the 

extension for infringement contentions. 

/ / / 

/ / / 

/ / / 

Case 4:10-cv-02203-SBA Document 38 Filed 01/05/11 Page 2 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

4:10-cv-02203-SBA -3- JOINT STIPULATION 

There have not yet been any modifications to the Court’s scheduling order in this case, and 

this stipulated modification would not affect the schedule for the parties’ claim construction briefs 

or the date of the Court’s Markman hearing. 

Therefore, the parties respectfully request that the Court approve this stipulation. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD. 

Dated: December 22, 2010 CARR & FERRELL LLP

By: /s/ Stuart C. Clark 

STUART C. CLARK 

CHRISTINE S. WATSON 

Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant 

YOICHI HARIGUCHI 

Dated: December 22, 2010 GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP

By: /s/ Stuart M. Rosenberg 

H. MARK LYON 

STUART M. ROSENBERG 

Attorneys for Defendants and Counterclaimants 

NETLOGIC MICROSYSTEMS, INC. and 

INTEGRATED DEVICE TECHNOLOGY, INC. 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: January 3, 2011 

 

 SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 4:10-cv-02203-SBA Document 38 Filed 01/05/11 Page 3 of 3