Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-07-01414/USCOURTS-ca4-07-01414-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Commonwealth of Virginia Department of Juvenile Justice
Appellee
Andrew Shannon
Appellant

Document Text:

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-1414

ANDREW SHANNON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF

JUVENILE JUSTICE,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, Chief

District Judge. (3:06-cv-00413-JRS)

Submitted: December 13, 2007 Decided: December 17, 2007

Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Curtis McKinley Hairston, Jr., THE GEE LAW FIRM, P.C., Richmond,

Virginia, for Appellant. Robert F. McDonnell, Attorney General of

Virginia, Maureen Riley Matsen, Deputy Attorney General, Peter R.

Messitt, Senior Assistant Attorney General/Chief, Gregory C.

Fleming, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 07-1414 Doc: 35 Filed: 12/17/2007 Pg: 1 of 2
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Andrew Shannon appeals the district court’s order

granting Defendant’s summary judgment motion on his retaliation

claim brought pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of

1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (2000). We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm substantially for the reasons stated by the district court.

See Shannon v. Virginia Dep’t of Juvenile Justice, No. 3:06-cv00413-JRS (E.D. Va. Apr. 4, 2007). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Appeal: 07-1414 Doc: 35 Filed: 12/17/2007 Pg: 2 of 2