Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-00505/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-00505-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Asian American Small Business Political Action Committee
Defendant
California Republican Party
Plaintiff

Document Text:

Stipulation and Order To Further Extend - 1 -

Time To Respond To Complaint

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Louis E. Kempinsky (CA State Bar No. 90068)

lek@kempinskylaw.com

Laura D. Castner (CA State Bar No. 172362)

ldc@kempinskylaw.com

KEMPINSKY LAW LTD.

11111 Santa Monica Blvd., Suite 1700

Los Angeles, CA 90025

Telephone: (424) 901-6690

Facsimile: (424) 901-1433

Attorneys for Defendant Asian American

 Small Business Political Action Committee

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SACRAMENTO DIVISION

CALIFORNIA REPUBLICAN PARTY, 

Plaintiff,

vs.

ASIAN AMERICAN SMALL BUSINESS

POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE, 

Defendant.

Case No. 2:15-CV-00505-TLN-AC

STIPULATION FOR THIRD EXTENSION 

OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO 

RESPOND TO COMPLAINT; ORDER 

THEREON

Case 2:15-cv-00505-TLN-AC Document 12 Filed 04/24/15 Page 1 of 3
Stipulation and Order To Further Extend - 2 -

Time To Respond To Complaint

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Plaintiff California Republican Party and Defendant Asian American Small Business Political 

Action Committee, through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate that Defendant shall 

have a fourteen-day extension of time up through, and including, May 4, 2015, in which to plead or 

otherwise respond to the complaint. This is the third such extension sought. Defendant and Plaintiff 

previously stipulated to two extensions of ten days each, the second of which extended until April 20, 

2015, the deadline for Defendant to plead or otherwise respond to the complaint. 

The Court’s approval of this third stipulated extension is respectfully requested as the parties 

appear close to reaching a settlement resolving all claims and disputes involved in this lawsuit, which 

asserts four claims against Defendant for trademark infringement. The parties contemplate that the 

settlement agreement will also include provisions intended to avoid future disputes of the kind giving 

rise to this lawsuit. 

The parties believe that they can, by May 4, 2015, complete the negotiation, documentation, 

and execution of a definitive agreement, which would then result in the dismissal of this lawsuit. The 

total extension of time to which the parties have stipulated in all three stipulations is thirty-four (34) 

///

///

///

///

///

///

///

///

///

///

///

///

///

Case 2:15-cv-00505-TLN-AC Document 12 Filed 04/24/15 Page 2 of 3
Stipulation and Order To Further Extend

Time To Respond To Complaint -3-

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

days from the date on which Defendant’s response to the complaint was originally due. This is the last 

stipulation the parties will file respecting the deadline to respond to the complaint.

Dated: April 17, 2015 DHILLON LAW GROUP INC.

By/s/ Harmeet K. Dhillon (as authorized on 4/17/15)

Harmeet K. Dhillon

Attorneys for Plaintiff

Dated: April 17, 2015 KEMPINSKY LAW LTD.

By/s/ Louis E. Kempinsky

Louis E. Kempinsky

Attorneys for Defendant

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 23, 2015 

Case 2:15-cv-00505-TLN-AC Document 12 Filed 04/24/15 Page 3 of 3