Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-00985/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-00985-7/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Orion S. Ehringer
Plaintiff
State of California
Defendant

Document Text:

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

ORION S. EHRINGER, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

STATE OF CALIFORNIA, 

Defendant. 

No. 2:15-CV-00985-KJM-AC 

ORDER 

 On March 1, 2016, the magistrate judge recommended dismissal of plaintiff’s first 

amended complaint for failure to state a claim under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8(a)(2) and 

granted thirty days for plaintiff to file a second amended complaint. ECF No. 24 at 10. This 

court adopted the magistrate court’s findings and recommendations on March 29, 2016. ECF No. 

26. Thereafter, plaintiff did not file a second amended complaint or take any further action to 

further litigation of this case. In response to plaintiffs’ inaction, the court ordered plaintiff to 

show cause within fourteen days why this case should not be dismissed for his failure to 

prosecute. Order, Aug. 23, 2016, ECF No. 28. 

 Now, over four months later, plaintiff has yet to respond to the order to show 

cause, or take any further action in this case. The court hereby DISMISSES the action for failure 

to prosecute in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). The Clerk of Court is directed to enter 

judgment and close this case. 

Case 2:15-cv-00985-KJM-AC Document 29 Filed 02/02/17 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2

 IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: February 2, 2017 

 

Case 2:15-cv-00985-KJM-AC Document 29 Filed 02/02/17 Page 2 of 2