Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-24-06927/USCOURTS-ca4-24-06927-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Allen
Appellee
Markis Rasaan Allen
Appellant
Beaufort County
Appellee
Billy O. Cooper
Appellee
D.C.C. Board
Appellee
Joy L. Davis
Appellee
Edith M. Greene
Appellee
Bryan T. Harris
Appellee
Joyce Y. Kerns-Correll
Appellee
Medical Staff at Central Prison
Appellee
Sheriff of Wake County
Appellee
State of North Carolina
Appellee
Elridge Walker
Appellee
Warden of Central Prison
Appellee
Warden of Granville Correctional
Appellee

Document Text:

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 24-6927

MARKIS RASAAN ALLEN, a/k/a/ Markis R. Allen,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

SHERIFF OF BEAUFORT COUNTY; WARDEN OF CENTRAL PRISON; 

WARDEN OF GRANVILLE CORRECTIONAL; BILLY O. COOPER; JOYCE Y. 

KERNS-CORRELL; EDITH M. GREENE; ELRIDGE WALKER; CASE 

MANAGER ALLEN; BRYAN T. HARRIS; D.C.C. BOARD; MEDICAL STAFF 

AT CENTRAL PRISON; SHERIFF OF WAKE COUNTY; STATE OF NORTH 

CAROLINA; JOY L. DAVIS,

 Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at 

Raleigh. James C. Dever III, District Judge. (5:23-ct-03190-D-RJ)

Submitted: December 5, 2024 Decided: December 10, 2024

Before GREGORY and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit 

Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Markis Rasaan Allen, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 24-6927 Doc: 8 Filed: 12/10/2024 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Markis Rasaan Allen seeks to appeal the district court’s order granting in part his 

motion for reconsideration, reopening his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action, and dismissing some—

but not all—claims. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. 

§ 1291, and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292; Fed. R. Civ. P. 

54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). Presently, the 

record does not contain a final order or an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. 

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

USCA4 Appeal: 24-6927 Doc: 8 Filed: 12/10/2024 Pg: 2 of 2