Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-04191/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-04191-7/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Wilford Raney
Plaintiff
Twitter, Inc.
Defendant

Document Text:

COOLEY LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN FRANCISCO

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

122358093 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT 

 3:15-CV-04191-WHA 

COOLEY LLP 

MICHAEL G. RHODES (116127) (rhodesmg@cooley.com) 

WHITTY SOMVICHIAN (194463) (wsomvichian@cooley.com) 

KYLE C. WONG (224021) (kwong@cooley.com) 

DEVON HANLEY COOK (262626) (dhanleycook@cooley.com) 

101 California Street, 5th Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94111-5800 

Telephone: (415) 693-2000 

Facsimile: (415) 693-2222 

Attorneys for Defendant 

TWITTER, Inc. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

WILFORD RANEY, as an individual, and on 

behalf of the others similarly situated, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

TWITTER, INC., a Delaware corporation, 

Defendant. 

Case No. 3:15-cv-04191-WHA

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO 

FIRST AMENDED CLASS ACTION 

COMPLAINT AND SET BRIEFING 

SCHEDULE FOR MOTION TO STAY (CIVIL 

L.R. 6-1(A), (B); 6-2) 

Judge: Hon. William H. Alsup 

Date: Not yet set 

Case 3:15-cv-04191-WHA Document 27 Filed 10/13/15 Page 1 of 3
COOLEY LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN FRANCISCO

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

122358093 1. 

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO 

INITIAL COMPLAINT 

 3:15-CV-04191-WHA 

Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 6-1(a), 6-1(b), and 6-2, plaintiff Wilford Raney (“Plaintiff”) 

and defendant Twitter, Inc. (“Twitter”) (collectively “the Parties”), by and through their 

respective counsel, stipulate and agree as follows: 

WHEREAS, Plaintiff filed a putative class action lawsuit against Twitter on or about 

September 14, 2015; 

WHERAS, Plaintiff filed his First Amended Class Action Complaint (“FAC”) on 

September 30, 2015; 

WHEREAS, Twitter’s deadline to respond to the Complaint is October 19, 2015; 

WHEREAS, under Civil Local Rule 6-1(a), the Parties may stipulate in writing, without a 

Court order, to extend the time within which to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint, 

provided the change will not alter any deadline already fixed by Court order; 

WHEREAS, under Civil Local Rule 6-1(b), a Court order is required for any enlargement 

of time that alters a deadline that involves papers required to be filed with the Court (other than 

an initial response to the complaint); 

WHEREAS, the parties may file a stipulation requesting an order that would extend time 

frames set in the Federal Rules, accompanied by a declaration complying with Civil Local Rule 

6-2, and such a declaration is filed herewith; 

WHEREAS, the Parties have agreed to stipulate under Civil Local Rule 6-1(a) and (b) to a 

filing and briefing schedule for Twitter’s response to the FAC as set forth below; 

WHEREAS, the Parties have stipulated under Civil Local Rule 6-1(b) to a filing and 

briefing schedule for Twitter’s anticipated motion to stay this action (“Motion to Stay”) as set 

forth below; 

WHEREAS, extending the deadline for any subsequent briefing necessitated by Twitter’s 

response to the Complaint and Motion to Stay, as set forth below, will allow for a more complete 

and orderly presentation of the complex legal issues the Court will need to resolve in both 

motions (see Declaration of Whitty Somvichian (“Somvichian Decl.”) ¶ 3, filed concurrently 

herewith); 

WHEREAS, extending the deadlines for any subsequent briefing necessitated by Twitter’s 

Case 3:15-cv-04191-WHA Document 27 Filed 10/13/15 Page 2 of 3
COOLEY LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN FRANCISCO

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

122358093 2. 

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO 

INITIAL COMPLAINT 

 3:15-CV-04191-WHA 

response to the Complaint or Motion to Stay will help accommodate attorneys’ schedules 

for the upcoming holidays. 

WHEREAS, no prior time modifications have been sought in this case (id. ¶ 6); 

WHEREAS, this modification would not affect the case schedule as none has been 

entered (id. ¶ 7). 

NOW THEREFORE, the Parties hereby stipulate and agree to extend the following 

deadlines: 

1. November 9, 2015: Twitter’s deadline to respond to the FAC and file its 

anticipated Motion to Stay; 

2. December 9, 2015: Plaintiff’s Oppositions due; 

3. January 9, 2015: Twitter’s Replies due. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

Dated: October 8, 2015 COOLEY LLP

s/ Whitty Somvichian 

Whitty Somvichian (194463) 

Attorneys for Defendant Twitter, Inc. 

Dated: October 8, 2015 EDELSON PC

s/ Alexander T.H. Nguyen 

Alexander T.H. Nguyen 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

Filer’s Attestation: Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3)) regarding signatures, Whitty 

Somvichian hereby attests that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained.

PROPOSED ORDER 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: 

 The Honorable William H. Alsup 

 United States District Judge 

October 13, 2015.

Case 3:15-cv-04191-WHA Document 27 Filed 10/13/15 Page 3 of 3