Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_19-cv-01087/USCOURTS-caed-2_19-cv-01087-5/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Randy Moore
Defendant
Public Timber Purchasers' Group
Plaintiff
Scott Russell
Defendant
Sierra Pacific Industries
Plaintiff
United States Department of Agriculture
Defendant
United States Forest Service
Defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER MODIFYING JAN. 31 SCHEDULING ORDER 1

16152-007/1568060_2

JOSH NEWTON (CA Bar No. 300264)

jn@karnopp.com

SARAH MONKTON (OR Bar No. 196018)

srm@karnopp.com 

KARNOPP PETERSEN LLP

360 SW Bond Street, Suite 400

Bend, Oregon 97702

TEL: (541) 382-3011

FAX: (541) 383-3073

Of Attorneys for Plaintiffs

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

PUBLIC TIMBER PURCHASERS' 

GROUP, an Oregon nonprofit corporation, 

and SIERRA PACIFIC INDUSTRIES, a 

California stock corporation,

Plaintiffs,

v.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF 

AGRICULTURE, UNITED STATES 

FOREST SERVICE; RANDY MOORE, 

Regional Forester, Pacific Southwest 

Region, United States Forest Service, in his 

official capacity; and SCOTT RUSSELL, 

Forest Supervisor, Shasta-Trinity National 

Forest, United States Forest Service, in his

official capacity,

Defendants.

Case No. 2:19-cv-01087-MCE-KJN

ORDER MODIFYING JAN. 31 SCHEDULING 

ORDER 

1.

On February 28, 2020, Plaintiffs and Defendants jointly moved the Court for an order 

modifying the Order Modifying Jan. 6 Scheduling Order, dated January 31, 2020 (Dkt. 30) 

(“Jan. 31 Scheduling Order”). 

/ / /

Case 2:19-cv-01087-MCE-KJN Document 34 Filed 03/06/20 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER MODIFYING JAN. 31 SCHEDULING ORDER 2 16152-007/1568060_2

2.

Being fully advised, the Court hereby finds and orders as follows:

a. The parties’ motion for an order modifying the Jan. 31 Scheduling Order was made in 

good faith and for good cause;

b. The Pretrial Order is modified to incorporate the following briefing schedule; and

Briefing Schedule for Cross-Motions for Summary Judgment

Event Description Deadline

1. Deadline for Plaintiffs to file Motion for 

Summary Judgment

March 27, 2020

2. Deadline for Defendants to file 

Opposition to Plaintiffs’ Motion for 

Summary Judgment and Defendants’ 

Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment

April 24, 2020

3. Deadline for Plaintiffs to file Reply in 

Support of Plaintiffs’ Motion for 

Summary Judgment and Opposition to 

Defendants’ Cross-Motion for Summary 

Judgment

May 22, 2020

4. Deadline for Defendants to file Reply in 

Support of Defendants’ Cross-Motion for 

Summary Judgment

June 12, 2020

5. Oral argument on cross-motions for 

summary judgment.

To be set by the Court

c. The parties are relieved of the requirement pursuant to Local Rule 260 to prepare and file 

a Statement of Undisputed Facts in connection with their cross-motions for summary 

judgment. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 5, 2020

Case 2:19-cv-01087-MCE-KJN Document 34 Filed 03/06/20 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 1

16152-007/1568060_2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on this 28th day of February, 2020, I filed a true and correct copy of 

the foregoing document with the Clerk of the Court for the United States District Court – Eastern 

District of California via the CM/ECF system. Participants in this case who are registered 

CM/ECF users will be served by the CM/ECF system.

KARNOPP PETERSEN LLP

/s/ Sarah R. Monkton 

SARAH R. MONKTON, PHV

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

Case 2:19-cv-01087-MCE-KJN Document 34 Filed 03/06/20 Page 3 of 3