Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_09-cr-00138/USCOURTS-caed-2_09-cr-00138-11/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Ahmad Khan
Defendant
Mumraiz Khan
Defendant
Naheed Khan
Defendant
USA
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

JOSEPH J. WISEMAN, ESQ., CSBN 107403 

JOSEPH J. WISEMAN, P.C. 

1477 Drew Avenue, Suite 106 

Davis, California 95618 

Telephone: 530.759.0700 

Facsimile: 530.759.0800 

Attorney for Defendant 

MUMRAIZ KHAN 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SACRAMENTO DIVISION 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff, 

vs. 

MUMRAIZ KHAN, AHMAD KHAN, and 

NAHEED KHAN, 

 Defendants. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

)

Case No. CR S 09-0138 MCE 

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO 

CONTINUE STATUS CONFERENCE 

DATE: September 23, 2010 

TIME: 9:00 a.m. 

CTRM. Honorable Morrison C. England, Jr. 

It is hereby stipulated and agreed to between plaintiff, UNITED STATES OF 

AMERICA, through its counsel of record, R. Steven Lapham, Assistant United States Attorney, 

defendant AHMAD KHAN, through his counsel of record, James R. Greiner, defendant 

NAHEED KHAN, through her counsel of record, Michael Long, and defendant MUMRAIZ 

KHAM, through his counsel of record, Joseph J. Wiseman, that the status conference scheduled 

for August 19, 2010, at 9:00 a.m., be rescheduled to September 23, 2010, 9:00 a.m. 

The parties further stipulate and agree that a continuance is appropriate in this case and 

request that the time beginning August 19, 2010 and extending through September 23, 2010, be 

ordered excluded from the calculation of time under the Speedy Trial Act. The ends of justice 

will be served by the Court excluding such time, so that counsel for the Defendants may have 

reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due 

diligence. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7). 

Case 2:09-cr-00138-JAM Document 86 Filed 08/20/10 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Specifically, the defendants and their counsel of record need additional time to review 

the proposed plea agreements offered by the government in anticipation of entering a change of 

plea on September 23, 2010. 

The parties submit that the interests of justice served by granting this continuance 

outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. 18 U.S.C. § 

3161(h)(7). 

Dated: August 17, 2010 Respectfully submitted, 

 JOSEPH J. WISEMAN, P. C. 

 By: /s/ Joseph J. Wiseman

 JOSEPH J. WISEMAN 

 Attorney for Defendant, MUMRAIZ KHAN 

Dated: August 17, 2010 By: /s/ James R. Greiner

JAMES R. GREINER 

 Attorney for Defendant, AHMAD KHAN 

Dated: August 17, 2010 By: /s/ Michael Long

MICHAEL LONG 

 Attorney for Defendant, NAHEED KHAN 

Dated: August 17, 2010 BENJAMIN B. WAGNER 

 United States Attorney 

 By: /s/ R. Steven Lapham

R. STEVEN LAPHAM, AUSA 

 Attorney for Plaintiff 

 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

Case 2:09-cr-00138-JAM Document 86 Filed 08/20/10 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER 

 

GOOD CAUSE HAVING BEEN SHOWN, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the 

status hearing in the above-captioned case be continued to September 23, 2010, at 9:00 a.m. IT 

IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT the time from the date of this Order to September 23, 2010 be 

excluded pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161(h)(7) (reasonable time to prepare) and Local Rule T4. 

DATED: August 20, 2010 

__________________________________ 

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 2:09-cr-00138-JAM Document 86 Filed 08/20/10 Page 3 of 3