Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_09-cv-03117/USCOURTS-caed-2_09-cv-03117-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
City of Woodland
Defendant
Desiree Murillo
Plaintiff
Ryan Piercy
Defendant
Casey Sullivan
Defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 This matter is deemed to be suitable for decision without oral *

argument. E.D. Cal. R. 230(g).

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DESIREE MURILLO, )

)

Plaintiff, ) 2:09-cv-03117-GEB-GGH

)

v. ) ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’

) MOTION TO DISMISS AS MOOT*

CITY OF WOODLAND, RYAN PIERCY, )

CASEY SULLIVAN, and DOES 1 to 40, )

Inclusive, )

)

Defendants. )

)

On December 30, 2009, Defendants filed a motion under

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) seeking to dismiss certain

claims in Plaintiff’s complaint. However, on February 11, 2010, the

parties filed a joint stipulation in which they stipulate to allowing 

Plaintiff to file a first amended complaint. Plaintiff then filed a

first amended complaint on February 16, 2010, which is now the

operative pleading. See Hal Roach Studios, Inc., v. Richard Feiner

and Co., Inc., 896 F.2d 1542, 1546 (9th Cir. 1989) (stating an amended

complaint supercedes the prior complaint). Since the pending

Case 2:09-cv-03117-KJN Document 20 Filed 02/19/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

dismissal motion does not address the operative pleading, it is denied

as moot.

Dated: February 18, 2010

 

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.

United States District Judge

Case 2:09-cv-03117-KJN Document 20 Filed 02/19/10 Page 2 of 2