Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca10-07-01371/USCOURTS-ca10-07-01371-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Benjamin Brieschke
Appellee
Mark Collins
Appellee
Bob Allen Custard
Appellant
A. Fenlon
Appellee
I. Garcia
Appellee
W. Haygood
Appellee
B. Hays
Appellee
Harley Lappin
Appellee
R. Madison
Appellee
M. Montgomery
Appellee
K. Rear
Appellee
J. T. Shartle
Appellee
Christopher B. Synsvoll
Appellee
United States of America
Appellee
Harrell Watts
Appellee
R. Wiley
Appellee

Document Text:

*

 After examining appellant’s brief and the appellate record, this panel has

determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the

determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2) and 10th Cir. R.

34.1(G). The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument. This

order and judgment is not binding precedent except under the doctrines of law of

the case, res judicata and collateral estoppel. It may be cited, however, for its

persuasive value consistent with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 and 10th Cir. R. 32.1.

FILED

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

January 3, 2008

Elisabeth A. Shumaker

Clerk of Court

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT

BOB ALLEN CUSTARD,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

HARLEY LAPPIN; HARRELL

WATTS; R. WILEY; K. REAR; M.

MONTGOMERY; J. T. SHARTLE;

BENJAMIN BRIESCHKE;

CHRISTOPHER B. SYNSVOLL;

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA;

MARK COLLINS; W. HAYGOOD; R.

MADISON, “Dolly”; B. HAYS; I.

GARCIA; A. FENLON,

Defendants - Appellees.

No. 07-1371

(D.C. No. 07-cv-844-ZLW-BNB)

(D. Colo.)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

Before LUCERO, HARTZ, and GORSUCH, Circuit Judges.

Appellate Case: 07-1371 Document: 0101102057 Date Filed: 01/03/2008 Page: 1 
- 2 -

Based on our independent review of the record in this case, and for

substantially the same reasons set forth by the district court, we affirm that

court’s judgment. With the dismissal of his complaint as malicious under 28

U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i), Mr. Custard has now earned at least three strikes under

§ 1915(g); accordingly, he may bring no more civil actions or appeals under

§ 1915 unless he is under imminent danger of serious physical injury. See 28

U.S.C. § 1915(g). We warn Mr. Custard that any future frivolous, malicious, or

abusive filings will put him at the risk of sanctions, including possible filing

restrictions.

ENTERED FOR THE COURT

Neil M. Gorsuch

Circuit Judge

Appellate Case: 07-1371 Document: 0101102057 Date Filed: 01/03/2008 Page: 2