Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_09-cv-02186/USCOURTS-caed-2_09-cv-02186-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Russell Bernardini
Petitioner
Unknown
Respondent

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RUSSELL BERNARDINI,

Petitioner, No. CIV S-09-2186 EFB P

vs.

UNKNOWN, ORDER AND

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Respondent.

 /

Petitioner is a prisoner proceeding without counsel seeking a writ of habeas corpus. See

28 U.S.C. § 2254. This proceeding was referred to this court by Local Rule 72-302 pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).

On November 5, 2009, the court found that petitioner had failed to pay the filing fee

required by 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) or a request to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 

§ 1915(a). Petitioner was granted thirty days in which to pay the filing fee or file an application

to proceed in forma pauperis and was warned that failure to comply would result in a

recommendation that this action be dismissed.

The 30-day period has expired and petitioner has not paid the filing fee, filed a completed

in forma pauperis application, or otherwise responded to the court’s order.

////

Case 2:09-cv-02186-WBS-EFB Document 5 Filed 02/19/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that the Clerk shall randomly assign a United States

District Judge to this case; and

It is hereby RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice.

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty-one

days after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written

objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned

“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Failure to file objections

within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Turner v.

Duncan, 158 F.3d 449, 455 (9th Cir. 1998); Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

Dated: February 19, 2010.

Case 2:09-cv-02186-WBS-EFB Document 5 Filed 02/19/10 Page 2 of 2