Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-01521/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-01521-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Moises Rivera
Petitioner
United States of America
Defendant

Document Text:

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff,

 v.

MOISES RIVERA,

Defendant. /

No. CR 01-419 CRB

 C 07-01521 CRB

ORDER

Now pending before the Court is defendant Moises Rivera’s motion pursuant to 28

U.S.C. section 2255. The Court previously issued an order noting:

Rivera alleges only that his “attorney, Nina Wilder, was ineffective for filing a

direct appeal on my behalf.” Before the Court can respond to defendant’s

motion, or ask the government to file a response, Rivera must provide more

information about his claim. In particular, he must specifically set forth why

he believes his counsel was constitutionally ineffective for filing an appeal. 

The reasons for his claim are not self evident since, as a result of his appeal,

Rivera’s sentence was reduced from 151 months to 121 months. If Rivera

wishes to prosecute this section 2255 motion he must file a more detailed

statement about his claim on or before April 20, 2007.

As of the date of this Order, Rivera has not issued a response. The Order was returned to the

Court as “undeliverable” with a forwarding address. The Clerk then mailed the Order to the

forwarding address but it was returned as “refused.” It is petitioner’s obligation to update his

address with the Court. Accordingly, Rivera’s 2255 petition is DISMISSED without 

//

Case 3:07-cv-01521-CRB Document 2 Filed 04/27/07 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

G:\CRBALL\2001\0419cr\rivera2255no.2.wpd 2

prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 27, 2007 

CHARLES R. BREYER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:07-cv-01521-CRB Document 2 Filed 04/27/07 Page 2 of 2