Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-01464/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-01464-3/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
CA Medical Facility
Defendant
Bobby Dixon
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

BOBBY DIXON, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

CA MEDICAL FACILITY, 

Defendant. 

No. 2:15-cv-1464-EFB P 

ORDER AND FINDINGS AND 

RECOMMENDATIONS 

 Bobby Dixon is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel. On July 15, 2015, the court 

found that he had failed to properly file a complaint, as required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 3, and had 

neither paid the filing fee required by 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a), or sought leave to proceed in forma 

pauperis and submit the affidavit and trust account statement required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). 

Accordingly, the court ordered Mr. Dixon to submit a complaint, as well as either the filing fee or 

a completed application to proceed in forma pauperis within thirty days and warned him that 

failure to do so may result in this action being dismissed. The time for acting has passed and he 

has not submitted a complaint, paid the filing fee or submitted an application for leave to proceed 

in forma pauperis or otherwise responded to the court’s order. 

 Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that the Clerk shall randomly assign a United States 

District Judge to this case. 

///// 

Case 2:15-cv-01464-KJM-EFB Document 13 Filed 09/15/15 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2

Further, it is RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. 

 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 

after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written 

objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned 

“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Any response to the 

objections shall be served and filed within fourteen days after service of the objections. The 

parties are advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to 

appeal the District Court’s order. Turner v. Duncan, 158 F.3d 449, 455 (9th Cir. 1998); Martinez 

v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 

DATED: September 14, 2015. 

Case 2:15-cv-01464-KJM-EFB Document 13 Filed 09/15/15 Page 2 of 2