Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-01117/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-01117-8/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
James D. Maciel
Petitioner
James A. Yates
Respondent

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JAMES D. MACIEL, 1:05-CV-1117 OWW LJO HC

Petitioner, 

ORDER DISREGARDING 

vs. APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN 

FORMA PAUPERIS AS MOOT

JAMES A. YATES, (Document No. 29)

 

Respondent. 

 / 

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in a habeas corpus action pursuant

to 28 U.S.C. Section 2254. 

On September 1, 2005, petitioner filed petition for writ of habeas corpus together

with an application to proceed in forma pauperis. On October 4, 2005, petitioner was granted in

forma pauperis status. Due to the fact that petitioner was granted in forma status, IT IS

HEREBY ORDERED THAT petitioner's application to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal is

DISREGARDED as moot.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: November 2, 2006 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill 

23ehd0 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:05-cv-01117-OWW -LJO Document 36 Filed 11/03/06 Page 1 of 1