Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-08-06194/USCOURTS-ca4-08-06194-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Edson Furtado
Appellant
Montgomery County Police Department
Appellee
Montgomery County, Maryland
Appellee

Document Text:

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-6194

EDSON FURTADO,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

MONTGOMERY COUNTY, MARYLAND; MONTGOMERY COUNTY POLICE

DEPARTMENT,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge.

(1:07-cv-02755-RDB)

Submitted: April 24, 2008 Decided: April 30, 2008

Before KING and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior Circuit

Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Edson Furtado, Appellant Pro Se. Edward Barry Lattner, COUNTY

ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, Rockville, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 08-6194 Doc: 14 Filed: 04/30/2008 Pg: 1 of 2
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Edson Furtado appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed

the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny

Furtado’s motion for appointment of counsel and affirm for the

reasons stated by the district court. Furtado v. Montgomery

County, Md., No. 1:07-cv-02755-RDB (D. Md. filed Jan. 14, 2008 &

entered Jan. 16, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Appeal: 08-6194 Doc: 14 Filed: 04/30/2008 Pg: 2 of 2