Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_19-cv-00382/USCOURTS-cand-3_19-cv-00382-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Commissioner of Social Security
Defendant
Alicia M. Mack
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ALICIA M. MACK,

Plaintiff,

v.

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL 

SECURITY,

Defendant.

Case No. 19-cv-00382-TSH 

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

Plaintiff Alicia Mack brings this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), seeking judicial 

review of a final decision denying her claim for disability benefits. Pursuant to the January 22, 

2019 Social Security Procedural Order issued in this case, Ms. Mack was required to file a motion 

for summary judgment or for remand within 28 days of service of the Commissioner’s answer. 

ECF No. 2. As the Commissioner served her answer on April 29, 2019 (ECF Nos. 12, 15), Ms. 

Mack’s motion was due May 30, 2019,1yet no filing has been received. Accordingly, the Court 

ORDERS Plaintiff Alicia Mack to show cause why this case should not be dismissed for failure to 

prosecute and failure to comply with court deadlines. Ms. Mack shall file a declaration by June 

20, 2019. Notice is hereby provided that failure to file a written response will be deemed an 

admission that Ms. Mack does not intend to prosecute, and the case will be dismissed without 

prejudice. Thus, it is imperative the Court receive a written response by the deadline above.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 3, 2019

THOMAS S. HIXSON

United States Magistrate Judge

 

1 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 6(d) permits an additional three days for service by mail.

Case 3:19-cv-00382-TSH Document 16 Filed 06/03/19 Page 1 of 1