Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-15-06517/USCOURTS-ca4-15-06517-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Lennell Dyches
Appellant
United States of America
Appellee

Document Text:

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-6517

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

LENNELL DYCHES,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Anderson. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., Senior

District Judge. (8:06-cr-00136-JFA-1)

Submitted: August 20, 2015 Decided: August 27, 2015

Amended: August 27, 2015

Before GREGORY and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Lennell Dyches, Appellant Pro Se. Elizabeth Jean Howard, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, 

for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 15-6517 Doc: 16 Filed: 08/27/2015 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Lennell Dyches appeals the district court’s order denying 

his self-styled “Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 60(b)(6) 

Motion for Reconsideration of Sentence” as a successive and 

unauthorized 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion, and denying his 

motions for transcripts at government expense, to review the 

original “wet-ink” signature on his plea agreement, and for an 

evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the record and find no 

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated 

by the district court. United States v. Dyches, No. 8:06-cr00136-JFA-1 (D.S.C. Apr. 2, 2015). We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before this court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Appeal: 15-6517 Doc: 16 Filed: 08/27/2015 Pg: 2 of 2