Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cr-00400/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cr-00400-6/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Andre Benard
Defendant
USA
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND ORDER 

CR 05-00400 SI

KEVIN V. RYAN (CSBN 118321)

United States Attorney

EUMI CHOI (WVSBN 0722)

Acting Chief, Criminal Division

EDWARD TORPOCO (CSBN 200653)

Assistant United States Attorney

450 Golden Gate Avenue, Box 36055

San Francisco, California 94102-3495

Telephone: (415) 436-7071

FAX: (415) 436-7234

Attorneys for Plaintiff UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) No.: CR 05-00400 SI

)

Plaintiff, ) STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]

) ORDER EXCLUDING TIME

v. ) FROM SPEEDY TRIAL CALCULATION

)

ANDRE BENARD, )

)

 Defendant. )

____________________________________) 

With the agreement of the parties, the Court enters this Order excluding the time period

from January 13, 2006 through February 10, 2006 under the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. 

§ 3161. The parties agree, and the Court finds and holds, as follows:

1. The Defendant is in custody serving a pre-existing state sentence of imprisonment. 

The parties appeared before the Court on January 13, 2006, for a status hearing. The United

States has provided the defense with a lab report on DNA testing of the firearm at issue in this

case. Defense counsel requested time to consult with his own expert concerning the DNA test

results, to obtain and review additional discovery materials relevant to the government’s

anticipated expert witness testimony concerning the DNA evidence, and to review certain

materials obtained pursuant to defense subpoena.

\\

Case 3:05-cr-00400-SI Document 26 Filed 01/17/2006 Page 1 of 2
 Case 3:05-cr-00400-SI Document 28 Filed 01/19/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 STIPULATION AND ORDER 

CR 05-00400 SI 2

2. At the request of the parties, the Court set a further status hearing in this case for

February 10, 2006, at 11:00 a.m., and excluded the intervening time period from the Speedy Trial

Act calculation. This filing memorializes that exclusion of time.

3. The parties jointly request that the Court exclude the time period from January 13,

2006 through February 10, 2006 under the Speedy Trial Act. In light of the foregoing facts, the

parties stipulate that the failure to grant the requested continuance would unreasonably deny the

Defendant effective preparation of counsel taking into account the exercise of due diligence, that

the ends of justice would be served by the Court excluding the proposed time period, and that

these ends outweigh the best interest of the public and the Defendant in a speedy trial. 18 U.S.C.

§ 3161(h)(8)(A), (B)(iv).

SO STIPULATED.

DATED:_January 17, 2006______ __ /S/ MARK GOLDROSEN ________

MARK GOLDROSEN

Attorney for Defendant Andre Benard

DATED:_ January 13, 2006______ ___ /S/ EDWARD TORPOCO_________

EDWARD TORPOCO

Assistant United States Attorney

In light of the foregoing facts, and with the consent of the parties, the Court hereby orders

that the period from January 13, 2006 through February 10, 2006 be excluded from the Speedy

Trial Act calculation under 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(A), (B)(iv).

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED:___________________ _________________________________

HON. SUSAN ILLSTON

United States District Judge

Case 3:05-cr-00400-SI Document 26 Filed 01/17/2006 Page 2 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Susan Illston

Case 3:05-cr-00400-SI Document 28 Filed 01/19/06 Page 2 of 2