Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-15-06687/USCOURTS-ca4-15-06687-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Shamika Broddy
Appellee
John Ervin Wilson
Appellant

Document Text:

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-6687

JOHN ERVIN WILSON, JR. a/k/a John Wilson, a/k/a John E. 

Wilson,

 Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

OFFICER SHAMIKA BRODDY,

 Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Beaufort. Bristow Marchant, Magistrate

Judge. (9:14-cv-02531-BM)

Submitted: October 28, 2015 Decided: November 5, 2015

Before MOTZ and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John Ervin Wilson, Appellant Pro Se. David Cornwell Holler, LEE 

ERTER WILSON HOLLER & SMITH, LLC, Sumter, South Carolina, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 15-6687 Doc: 16 Filed: 11/05/2015 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

John Ervin Wilson appeals the magistrate judge’s* order 

granting summary judgment to defendant and dismissing Wilson’s 

complaint filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012). We have reviewed 

the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm 

for the reasons stated by the district court. Wilson v. Broddy, 

No. 9:14-cv-02531-BM (D.S.C. Mar. 30, 2015). We dispense with 

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

 * The parties consented to the jurisdiction of a magistrate 

judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (2012).

Appeal: 15-6687 Doc: 16 Filed: 11/05/2015 Pg: 2 of 2