Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-01069/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-01069-2/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Michelle Yolette Brown
Plaintiff
Kaiser Permanente
Defendant
Rebecca Pellechi
Defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MICHELLE YOLETTE BROWN,

Plaintiff,

v.

KAISER PERMANENTE, REBECCA 

PELLECHI, individually, as a Supervisor 

with KAISER PERMANENTE,

Defendants.

No. 2:14-cv-1069 KJM CKD PS (TEMP)

ORDER

This action was referred to the undersigned pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). 

Calendared for hearing on February 10, 2016 is defendants’ motion for summary judgment. 

However, no opposition to the motion has been filed. 

Local Rule 230(c) provides that opposition, if any, to the granting of a motion must be 

filed fourteen days preceding the noticed hearing date. The Rule further provides that “[n]o party 

will be entitled to be heard in opposition to a motion at oral arguments if written opposition to the 

motion has not been timely filed by that party.” In addition, Local Rule 230(i) provides that 

failure to appear may be deemed withdrawal of opposition to the motion or may result in 

sanctions. Finally, Local Rule 110 provides that failure to comply with the Local Rules “may be 

grounds for imposition of any and all sanctions authorized by statute or Rule or within the 

inherent power of the Court.”

Case 2:14-cv-01069-KJM-CKD Document 46 Filed 02/01/16 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The hearing date of February 10, 2016 is vacated. Hearing on defendants’ motion is 

continued to March 16, 2016 at 10:00 a.m. in courtroom no. 24.

2. Plaintiff shall file opposition, if any, to the motion no later than March 2, 2016.

1

 

Failure to file opposition will be deemed as a statement of non-opposition and shall result in 

submission of the motion on the papers and a recommendation that this action be dismissed 

pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).

3. Reply, if any, shall be filed no later than March 9, 2016.

Dated: February 1, 2016

BVD/brown1069.no.opp

 

1

 Alternatively, plaintiff may comply with this order by filing a request for voluntary dismissal 

pursuant to Rule 41(a)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

_____________________________________

CAROLYN K. DELANEY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:14-cv-01069-KJM-CKD Document 46 Filed 02/01/16 Page 2 of 2