Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_15-cr-00180/USCOURTS-caed-1_15-cr-00180-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
August Dominic Davison
Defendant
USA
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1 STIPULATION REGARDING EXCLUDABLE TIME 

PERIODS UNDER SPEEDY TRIAL ACT

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

30

31

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

ANGELA L. SCOTT

Assistant United States Attorney

2500 Tulare Street, Suite 4401

Fresno, CA 93721

Telephone: (559) 497-4000

Facsimile: (559) 497-4099

Attorneys for Plaintiff

United States of America

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff,

 v.

AUGUST DOMINIC DAVISON,

 Defendant.

CASE NO. 1:15-00180-AWI

STIPULATION REGARDING EXCLUDABLE 

TIME PERIODS UNDER SPEEDY TRIAL ACT; 

[PROPOSED] FINDINGS AND ORDER

CURRENT DATE: September 8, 2015

CURRENT TIME: 2:30 p.m.

COURT: Hon. Jennifer L. Thurston

STIPULATION

Plaintiff United States of America, by and through its counsel of record, and defendant, by and 

through defendant’s counsel of record, hereby stipulate as follows: 

1. By previous order, this matter was set for status on September 8, 2015 at 2:30 p.m., and 

time was excluded pursuant to the Speedy Trial Act from July 17, 2015, through September 8, 2015. 

2. By this stipulation, defendant now moves to continue the status conference until 

November 17, 2015, at 2:30 p.m. and to exclude time between September 8, 2015, and November 17, 

2015, under the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C.§ 3161(h)(7)(A), B(iv) [Local Code T4]. 

3. The parties agree and stipulate, and request that the Court find the following: 

a) The government has represented that the discovery associated with this case 

includes hundreds of pages of reports and pleadings, thousands of photographs, numerous videos 

and several audio recordings. All of this discovery has been either produced directly to counsel 

Case 1:15-cr-00180-DAD-BAM Document 9 Filed 09/03/15 Page 1 of 3
2 STIPULATION REGARDING EXCLUDABLE TIME 

PERIODS UNDER SPEEDY TRIAL ACT

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

30

31

and/or made available for inspection and copying.

b) Counsel for defendant desires additional time to review the current charges, to 

review the discovery, to conduct research and investigation related to the charges and potential 

pretrial motions, and to consult with his client.

c) Counsel for defendant believes that failure to grant the above-requested 

continuance would deny him/her the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking 

into account the exercise of due diligence.

d) The government does not object to the continuance.

e) Based on the above-stated findings, the ends of justice served by continuing the 

case as requested outweigh the interest of the public and the defendant in a trial within the 

original date prescribed by the Speedy Trial Act. 

f) For the purpose of computing time under the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161, 

et seq., within which trial must commence, the time period of September 8, 2015 to November 

17, 2015, inclusive, is deemed excludable pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 3161(h)(7)(A), B(iv) [Local 

Code T4] because it results from a continuance granted by the Court at defendant’s request on 

the basis of the Court’s finding that the ends of justice served by taking such action outweigh the 

best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. 

4. Nothing in this stipulation and order shall preclude a finding that other provisions of the 

Speedy Trial Act dictate that additional time periods are excludable from the period within which a trial 

//

//

//

//

//

//

//

//

//

Case 1:15-cr-00180-DAD-BAM Document 9 Filed 09/03/15 Page 2 of 3
3 STIPULATION REGARDING EXCLUDABLE TIME 

PERIODS UNDER SPEEDY TRIAL ACT

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

30

31

must commence.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Dated: September 1, 2015 BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

/s/ ANGELA L. SCOTT

ANGELA L. SCOTT

Assistant United States Attorney

Dated: September 1, 2015 /s/ JARED THOMPSON

JARED THOMPSON

Counsel for Defendant 

August Dominic Davison

[PROPOSED] FINDINGS AND ORDER

Pursuant to the parties' stipulation and good cause shown, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the 

status conference, currently set for September 8, 2015, is hereby vacated and continued to November 17, 

2015, at 2:30 p.m. It is further ORDERED that based upon the need of defense counsel to prepare and 

review discovery, good cause exists and the interests of the defendant and the public in a speedy trial are 

outweighed. Thus, the Court ORDERS the time period between September 8, 2015, and November 17, 

2015, to be excluded from the calculation under the Speedy Trial Act pursuant to Local Codes T4.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 3, 2015 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:15-cr-00180-DAD-BAM Document 9 Filed 09/03/15 Page 3 of 3