Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cr-00764/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cr-00764-3/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Juan Herrera-Santos
Defendant
USA
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Excluding Time

CR 07-764-SI 1

JOSEPH P. RUSSONIELLO (CABN 44332)

United States Attorney

BRIAN J. STRETCH (CABN 163973)

Chief, Criminal Division

TAREK J. HELOU (CABN 218225)

Assistant United States Attorney

450 Golden Gate Avenue, Box 36055

San Francisco, California 94102

Telephone: (415) 436-7071

Facsimile: (415) 436-7234

Tarek.J.Helou@usdoj.gov

Attorneys for Plaintiff

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

JUAN HERRERA-SANTOS,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CR No. 07-764-SI

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

EXCLUDING TIME UNDER 18 U.S.C. § 3161

On February 8, 2008, the parties in this case appeared before the Court and stipulated that

time from February 8, 2008 through March 14, 2008 should be excluded from Speedy Trial Act

calculations because defense counsel needs adequate time to continue investigation related to

this case and to draft motions. The parties represented to the Court that the length of the

requested continuance was the reasonable amount of time necessary for effective preparation of

defense counsel, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. 18 U.S.C. §

3161(h)(8)(B)(iv). The parties also agreed that the ends of justice served by this continuance

Case 3:07-cr-00764-SI Document 22 Filed 02/14/2008 Page 1 of 2 Case 3:07-cr-00764-SI Document 23 Filed 02/15/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Excluding Time

CR 07-764-SI 2

outweighed the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. 18 U.S.C. §

3161(h)(8)(A).

SO STIPULATED:

JOSEPH P. RUSSONIELLO

United States Attorney

DATED: February 14, 2008 /s/

TAREK J. HELOU

Assistant United States Attorney 

DATED: February 14, 2008 /s/

STEVEN KALAR

Attorney for Defendant JUAN HERRERA-SANTOS

As the Court found on February 8, 2008, and for the reasons stated above, the Court finds

that the ends of justice served by the requested continuance outweigh the best interests of the

public and the defendant in a speedy trial. The Court also finds that time from February 8, 2008

through March 14, 2008 shall be excluded from Speedy Trial Act calculations for effective

preparation of defense counsel. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(A). Failing to grant the requested

continuance would deny counsel reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into

account the exercise of due diligence, and would result in a miscarriage of justice. 18 U.S.C. §

3161(h)(8)(B)(iv).

SO ORDERED.

DATED:______________ _____________________________________

THE HONORABLE SUSAN ILLSTON

United States District Judge

Case 3:07-cr-00764-SI Document 22 Filed 02/14/2008 Page 2 of 2 Case 3:07-cr-00764-SI Document 23 Filed 02/15/08 Page 2 of 2