Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-01317/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-01317-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Anlin Industries, Inc.
Counter Defendant
Paul Burgess
Counter Claimant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

____________________________________

Stip. Extending Time to Respond to Answer and Counte rcla im - 1 -

Michele A. Engnath, #149486

Law Offices of Michele A. Engnath

11521 Excelsior Avenue

Hanford, California 93230

Phone: 559-582-8781

Fax: 559-582-8784

E-Mail: mae@micheleengnath.com

 

Attorneys for Plaintiff, Anlin Industries, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

(Fresno Division)

ANLIN INDUSTRIES, INC., a California

corporation, 

Plaintiff,

vs.

PAUL BURGESS, 

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO. 1:05-CV-01317-REC-DLB

STIPULATION AND ORDER

ENLARGING TIME TO FILE

RESPONSIVE PLEADINGS TO

COUNTERCLAIMS AND MOTIONS

RELATED TO ANSWER

Whereas, the summons and complaint were personally served on Defendant, Paul 

Burgess, on November 16, 2005: 

Whereas, Defendant is in propria persona and requested and was granted extensions to and

including January 12, 2006 to file responsive pleadings to the complaint;

Whereas, Defendant filed his answer and counterclaim on January 12, 2006 and Plaintiff was

served with the same on January 13, 2006. 

Whereas, Plaintiff is in need of an additional 20 days to file any motions in relation to

Defendant’s answer and responsive pleadings to Defendant’s counterclaims, as the allegations in the

answer and counterclaim are extensive; 

Case 1:05-cv-01317-DLB Document 16 Filed 01/28/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

____________________________________

Stip. Extending Time to Respond to Answer and Counte rcla im - 2 -

Whereas, Defendant has no objection to Plaintiff’s request for such additional time; 

 THE PARTIES TO THIS ACTION STIPULATE, subject to the Court’s approval, that the time

for Plaintiff to file any motions in relation to Defendant’s answer and to file responsive pleadings to

Defendant’s Counterclaim be extended to and including February 22, 2006.

Dated: January _25__ , 2006 __/s/ Michele A. Engnath____ 

Michele A. Engnath

Attorneys for Plaintiff, Anlin Industries, Inc.

Dated: January _23__, 2006 ___/s/Paul Burgess____

Paul Burgess

Defendant, IN PROPRIA PERSONA

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: January 28, 2006 /s/ Dennis L. Beck 

3b142a UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:05-cv-01317-DLB Document 16 Filed 01/28/06 Page 2 of 2