Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_13-cv-00520/USCOURTS-caed-2_13-cv-00520-12/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Amy Fraser
Plaintiff
Paula Haug
Plaintiff
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER DECERTIFYING THE CLASS AND DISMISSING THE ACTION 

REED SMITH LLP 

A limited liability partnership formed in the State of Delaware 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SACRAMENTO DIVISION 

AMY FRASER and PAULA HAUG, on 

behalf of themselves and all others 

similarly situated, 

 Plaintiffs, 

 vs. 

WAL-MART STORES, INC., a 

Delaware corporation; and DOES 1 

through 50, inclusive, 

 Defendants. 

Case No.: 2:13-CV-00520-TLN-DB

ORDER: 

(1) DECERTIFYING THE CLASS; 

AND 

(2) DISMISSING THE ACTION 

FED. R. CIV. PROC. 23(c)(1)(C) 

FED. R. CIV. PROC. 41(a)(1)(ii) 

District Court Judge Troy L. Nunley 

Courtroom 27 

Action Filed: January 29, 2013 

Case 2:13-cv-00520-TLN-DB Document 99 Filed 12/20/16 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-1- 

ORDER DECERTIFYING THE CLASS AND DISMISSING THE ACTION 

REED SMITH LLP 

A limited liability partnership formed in the State of Delaware 

ORDER 

 Having read and considered the Stipulation filed by Plaintiffs Amy Fraser (“Ms. 

Fraser”) and Paula Haug (“Ms. Haug”) (collectively “Plaintiffs”) and Defendant WalMart Stores, Inc. (“Wal-Mart”), for an order (1) decertifying the class (ECF No. 22); 

and (2) dismissing Plaintiffs’ individual claims with prejudice, and the class claims 

without prejudice, and good cause appearing therefor, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows: 

1. The Class that was certified by this Court on December 24, 2014 (ECF 

No. 22) is decertified; 

2. Plaintiffs’ individual claims are dismissed in their entirety, with 

prejudice; 

3. The claims of the putative class members are dismissed in their entirety 

without prejudice; 

4. Except as otherwise expressly agreed in writing, the parties shall each 

bear their own attorneys’ fees and costs; and 

5. Pursuant to the parties’ request contained in the Stipulation, the Court 

will retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the settlement agreement. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: December 20, 2016 

Case 2:13-cv-00520-TLN-DB Document 99 Filed 12/20/16 Page 2 of 2