Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-16-07306/USCOURTS-ca4-16-07306-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Barrett

Cranford
Appellee
Dycus

Estridge

Hanson

Harrington

Darron Jermaine Jones
Appellant
Rivera

Roberson

Smith

Warden

Young

Document Text:

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-7306

DARRON JERMAINE JONES,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

CRANFORD,

Defendant – Appellee,

and

HARRINGTON; ESTRIDGE; ROBERSON; SMITH; YOUNG; BARRETT; 

HANSON; WARDEN; DYCUS; RIVERA,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Frank D. Whitney,

Chief District Judge. (3:15-cv-00028-FDW)

Submitted: December 15, 2016 Decided: December 20, 2016

Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Darron Jermaine Jones, Appellant Pro Se. Vanessa N. Totten, 

Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for 

Appellee.

Appeal: 16-7306 Doc: 19 Filed: 12/20/2016 Pg: 1 of 3
2

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 16-7306 Doc: 19 Filed: 12/20/2016 Pg: 2 of 3
3

PER CURIAM:

Darron Jermaine Jones appeals the district court’s order 

granting Defendant Cranford’s motion to dismiss Jones’ 42 U.S.C. 

§ 1983 (2012) action against Cranford. We have reviewed the 

record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for 

the reasons stated by the district court. See Jones v. 

Cranford, No. 3:15-cv-00028-FDW (W.D.N.C. Aug. 24, 2016). We 

deny Jones’ motion for default judgment. We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before this court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Appeal: 16-7306 Doc: 19 Filed: 12/20/2016 Pg: 3 of 3