Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_16-cv-01183/USCOURTS-caed-1_16-cv-01183-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Board of Supervisors of County of Stanislaus
Defendant
County of Stanislaus
Defendant
Nicholas Honchariw
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION & [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE

CASE NO. 1:16-CV-01183-LJO-BAM

MATTHEW D. ZINN (SBN 214587)

LAURA D. BEATON (SBN 294466)

SHUTE, MIHALY & WEINBERGER LLP

396 Hayes Street

San Francisco, CA 94102

Telephone: (415) 552-7272

Facsimile: (415) 552-5816

zinn@smwlaw.com

beaton@smwlaw.com

JOHN P. DOERING, County Counsel

(SBN 148907)

THOMAS E. BOZE, Assistant County Counsel

(SBN 209790)

STANISLAUS COUNTY COUNSEL

1010 Tenth Street, Suite 6400

Modesto, CA 95354

Telephone: (209) 525-6376

Facsimile: (209) 525-4473

Attorneys for Defendants

County of Stanislaus et al.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, FRESNO DIVISION

NICHOLAS HONCHARIW, TRUSTEE, 

HONCHARIW FAMILY TRUST,

Plaintiff,

v.

COUNTY OF STANISLAUS; BOARD 

OF SUPERVISORS OF COUNTY OF 

STANISLAUS,

Defendants.

Case No. 1:16-CV-01183-LJO-BAM

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]

ORDER CONTINUING SCHEDULING 

CONFERENCE

Case 1:16-cv-01183-LJO-BAM Document 10 Filed 10/25/16 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

STIPULATION & [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE

CASE NO. 1:16-CV-01183-LJO-BAM

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16(b)(4), which allows a court to modify a 

conference schedule for good cause, Plaintiff Nicholas Honchariw, Trustee, Honchariw Family 

Trust and Defendants County of Stanislaus and Board of Supervisors of the County of 

Stanislaus (“Parties”) hereby stipulate and request that this Court continue the Mandatory 

Scheduling Conference by at least 30 days. 

The Mandatory Scheduling Conference is currently scheduled for November 16, 2016. 

This date requires the Parties to meet and confer by October 27, 2016 and file a Joint Scheduling 

Report by November 8, 2016. However, Defendants have moved to dismiss the case, and that 

motion will be heard on November 7, 2016. Resolution of this motion will inform the need for 

and scope of the conference between the Parties and the contents of the Joint Scheduling Report. 

To reduce inefficiencies and the burden on the Parties and this Court, the Parties 

respectfully request that the Court order continue the Mandatory Scheduling Conference for at 

least 30 days. The Court’s ruling on Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss will either moot the need 

for the Parties to meet and confer or will inform the Parties’ conference and preparation of a 

Joint Scheduling Report.

DATED: October 21, 2016 SHUTE, MIHALY & WEINBERGER LLP

JOHN P. DOERING, COUNTY COUNSEL

By: /s/Matthew D. Zinn

MATTHEW D. ZINN

Attorneys for Defendants

County of Stanislaus et al.

DATED: October 21, 2016 NICHOLAS HONCHARIW, TRUSTEE, 

HONCHARIW FAMILY TRUST

By: /s/Nicholas Honchariw (Authorized on 10/21/16)

NICHOLAS HONCHARIW

Attorney for Plaintiff

Case 1:16-cv-01183-LJO-BAM Document 10 Filed 10/25/16 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[PROPOSED] ORDER

For good cause shown, the Mandatory Scheduling Conference scheduled for November 

16, 2016, is continued to Wednesday, December 21, 2016 at 9:00 AM in courtroom 8 (BAM) 

before Judge McAuliffe.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 24, 2016 /s/ Barbara A. McAuliffe _

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:16-cv-01183-LJO-BAM Document 10 Filed 10/25/16 Page 3 of 3