Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-02679/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-02679-5/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Darlice Carter
Plaintiff
Jahman Yates
Defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DARLICE CARTER,

Plaintiff,

v.

JAHMAN YATES,

Defendant.

No. 2:15-cv-2679-JAM-KJN (PS)

ORDER

Presently before the court is plaintiff’s motion styled as a “motion for hearing before a 

senior judge.” (ECF No. 10.) Liberally construed, it appears that plaintiff requests that this case 

be heard and reviewed by the presiding district judge. Findings and Recommendations are 

currently pending in this action recommending that this case be dismissed with prejudice pursuant 

to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) based on plaintiff’s multiple failures to follow court 

orders directing her to file an amended complaint that addresses the fundamental pleading 

deficiencies set forth in her previously dismissed complaints. (ECF No. 9.) The conclusions of 

law within these Findings and Recommendations will be reviewed de novo by the presiding 

district judge. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983).

////

////

////

Case 2:15-cv-02679-JAM-KJN Document 11 Filed 07/27/16 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s “motion for hearing before a 

senior judge” (ECF No. 10) is DENIED as moot.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 27, 2016

Case 2:15-cv-02679-JAM-KJN Document 11 Filed 07/27/16 Page 2 of 2