Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_17-mc-80107/USCOURTS-cand-4_17-mc-80107-3/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
John Doe
Objector
Ilyas Khrapunov
Plaintiff
Pavel Prosyankin
Objector

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[3212462.1] 

Case No. 4:17-mc-80107-HSG

STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING HEARING DATE AND RE-SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE

JEFFREY L. BORNSTEIN – 099358 

MICHAEL FREEDMAN – 262850 

CARA E. TRAPANI – 313411 

ROSEN BIEN GALVAN & GRUNFELD LLP 

50 Fremont Street, 19th Floor 

San Francisco, California 94105-2235 

Telephone: (415) 433-6830 

Facsimile: (415) 433-7104 

Email: JBornstein@rbgg.com 

 MFreedman@rbgg.com 

 CTrapani@rbgg.com 

ATTORNEYS FOR NON-PARTIES 

PAVEL PROSYANKIN AND JOHN DOE 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, OAKLAND DIVISION 

IN RE APPLICATION OF ILYAS 

KHRAPUNOV PURSUANT TO 28 

U.S.C. § 1782 FOR THE TAKING OF 

DISCOVERY FOR USE IN A FOREIGN 

PROCEEDING 

 Case No. 4:17-mc-80107-HSG 

STIPULATION AND ORDER 

CONTINUING HEARING DATE AND 

RE-SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE 

Judge: Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. 

Date: March 29, 2018 

Time: 2:00 p.m.

Case 4:17-mc-80107-HSG Document 39 Filed 01/09/18 Page 1 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[3212462.1] 1 Case No. 4:17-mc-80107-HSG

STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING HEARING DATE AND RE-SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE

Non-Parties Pavel Prosyankin and Joe Doe (collectively “Objectors”), by their 

counsel Jeffrey L. Bornstein, and Applicant Ilyas Khrapunov, by his counsel Martha 

Boersch, hereby stipulate and agree as follows: 

1. On October 1, 2017, Objectors Pavel Prosyankin and John Doe filed a motion to 

quash the subpoena Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore issued on August 25, 2017, to Google, 

Inc. (Dkt. 8). Ilyas Khrapunov has applied for that subpoena pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1782. 

2. After briefing and oral argument on the motion to quash, Judge Westmore issued 

an order on November 22, 2017, granting in part and denying in part the Objectors’ motion to 

quash. In the order, she granted the Objectors 15 days in which to file a motion in this Court for 

relief from her order. (Dkt. 29). 

3. On December 6, 2017, the Objectors filed a Motion for De Novo Determination of 

Dispositive Order of Magistrate Judge concurrently with an Administrative Motion to Augment 

Record and Set Briefing Schedule. (Dkts. 32 and 33). Based on the Court’s calendar, Objectors 

noticed March 1, 2018, as the hearing date for their motions. Objectors’ counsel has a conflict and 

after conferring with Applicant’s counsel is requesting a four-week continuance to March 29, 

2018, due to the Court’s availability. 

4. Subject to this Court’s confirming Order, the parties request that: 

 The hearing date be continued to March 29, 2018. 

 Applicant Khrapunov’s responses shall be filed on or before 

February 21, 2018. 

 Any replies by the Objectors shall be filed on or before March 7, 

2018. 

/ / / 

/ / / 

/ / / 

/ / / 

/ / / 

/ / / 

/ / / 

Case 4:17-mc-80107-HSG Document 39 Filed 01/09/18 Page 2 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[3212462.1] 2 Case No. 4:17-mc-80107-HSG

STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING HEARING DATE AND RE-SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE

 IT IS SO STIPULATED 

DATED: January 9, 2018 Respectfully submitted, 

ROSEN BIEN GALVAN & GRUNFELD LLP 

By: /s/ Jeffrey L. Bornstein

 Jeffrey L. Bornstein 

Michael Freedman 

Cara E. Trapani 

 

Attorneys for Non-Parties 

PAVEL PROSYANKIN AND JOHN DOE 

DATED: January 9, 2018 BOERSCH SHAPIRO LLP 

By: /s/ Martha Boersch

 Martha Boersch 

 

Attorney for Applicant 

ILYAS KHRAPUNOV 

ECF ATTESTATION 

I attest that concurrence in e-filing this STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER CONTINUING HEARING DATE AND RE-SETTING BRIEFING 

SCHEDULE has been received from Martha Boesrsch in compliance with Civil L.R. 5-

1(i)(3). 

DATED: January 9, 2018 

 By: /s/ Jeffrey L. Bornstein 

 Jeffrey L. Bornstein 

 

Case 4:17-mc-80107-HSG Document 39 Filed 01/09/18 Page 3 of 4
[3212462.1] 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ST

go

con

Mo

Bri

be 

the

eff

DA

TIPULATION

IT IS H

od cause ap

ntinued to M

otion for De

iefing shou

filed on or 

e Magistrate

fect through

IT IS S

ATED: Jan

N AND ORDER

HEREBY O

ppearing, th

March 29, 2

e Novo Rev

uld be due o

before Mar

e Judge in h

hout the pen

SO ORDER

nuary 9, 201

R CONTINUI

ORDERED,

he motions h

2018 at 2:00

view and A

n or before

rch 7, 2018

her Novemb

ndency of th

RED. 

18 

3

ING HEARIN

ORD

, based on th

hearing prev

0 p.m. App

dministrativ

 February 2

. This Orde

ber 22, 2017

his appeal.

By: 

HO

Un

3

NG DATE AN

DER

the foregoin

viously set 

plicant Ilyas

ve Motion t

21, 2018. A

er does not 

7, order (D

ON. HAYW

nited States 

ND RE-SETTI

ng stipulatio

for March 

s Khrapuno

to Augmen

Any replies 

alter the St

kt. 29), whi

WOOD S. G

 District Ju

Case No. 4:17

ING BRIEFIN

on of the pa

1, 2018 has

ov’s opposit

nt Record an

by the Obje

tay Order is

ich shall rem

GILLIAM, J

dge 

7-mc-80107-HS

NG SCHEDUL

arties and 

s been 

tions to the 

nd Set 

ectors shall

ssued by 

main in 

JR. 

SG

LE

l

Case 4:17-mc-80107-HSG Document 39 Filed 01/09/18 Page 4 of 4