Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_13-cv-01133/USCOURTS-caed-2_13-cv-01133-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Neng Saypao Pha
Petitioner
Gary Swarthout
Respondent

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

NENG SAYPAO PHA,

Petitioner,

v.

GARY SWARTHOUT,

Respondent.

No. 2:13-cv-1133-MCE-EFB P

ORDER

Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding through counsel, has filed an application for a writ 

of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States 

Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 

On February 7, 2014, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 

which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to 

the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Neither party has filed 

objections to the findings and recommendations.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 

supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 

ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed February 7, 2014, are adopted in full;

2. Respondent’s motion to dismiss (ECF No. 14) is denied;

Case 2:13-cv-01133-MCE-GGH Document 20 Filed 03/17/14 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

3. Respondent is directed to file an answer within 60 days from the date of this order; and

4. Petitioner’s reply, if any, is due within 30 days thereafter. 

Dated: March 17, 2014

Case 2:13-cv-01133-MCE-GGH Document 20 Filed 03/17/14 Page 2 of 2