Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_15-cv-00292/USCOURTS-cand-4_15-cv-00292-19/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Quincy Bioscience, LLC
Defendant
Phillip Racies
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

PHILLIP RACIES,

Plaintiff,

v.

QUINCY BIOSCIENCE, LLC,

Defendant.

Case No. 15-cv-00292-HSG 

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO SEAL

Re: Dkt. No. 112

Pending before the Court is Plaintiff Phillip Racies’ motion to file under seal his motion to 

strike the expert reports of Drs. Alexander, Schwartz, and Kurzer as well as an associated exhibit. 

Dkt. No. 112. No response to the motion to seal was filed, and the time to do so has passed.

Plaintiff seeks to redact a portion of page 7 of his motion to strike as well as Exhibit C to 

the declaration of Patricia N. Syverson filed in support thereof because they contain references to 

documents that Defendant has designated as “Confidential” under the protective order. See Dkt. 

No. 112-1 ¶ 3. Designating party and Defendant Quincy Biosciences, LLC did not file a 

declaration in support of Plaintiff’s motion to seal, as required in this situation under the Local 

Rules. See Civ. L.R. 79-5(e)(1) (“Within 4 days of the filing of the Administrative Motion to File 

Under Seal, the Designating Party must file a declaration as required by subsection 79-5(d)(1)(A) 

establishing that all of the designated material is sealable.”). Accordingly, the motion to seal is 

DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: 11/22/2017

______________________________________

HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR.

United States District Judge

Case 4:15-cv-00292-HSG Document 136 Filed 11/22/17 Page 1 of 1