Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_12-cv-02244/USCOURTS-caed-2_12-cv-02244-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Derek Buckmaster
Plaintiff
Sharon Cross
Defendant
Micheline Johnson
Defendant
Sodexo
Defendant
Mila Sturgis
Defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DEREK BUCKMASTER,

 Plaintiff,

 v.

SODEXO, formerly known as

SODEXHO ALLIANCE, a foreign

corporation; MILA STURGIS;

MICHELINE JOHNSON; and DOES

1-50, inclusive, 

 Defendants.*

________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

2:12-cv-02244-GEB-JFM

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

Plaintiff was required to respond to an Order filed December

4, 2012, by either filing proof that Defendant Sharon Cross was served

with process or a document showing good cause for Plaintiff’s failure to

serve this Defendant within the 120-day period prescribed in Federal

Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m). (ECF No. 12.) This filing was due no later

than December 28, 2012. Id. The December 4th Order warned Plaintiff

that failure to make the required showing by the deadline would result

in Defendant Sharon Cross being dismissed from this action. 

///

///

The caption has been amended according to the dismissal of *

Defendant Sharon Cross. 

1

Case 2:12-cv-02244-GEB-JFM Document 13 Filed 01/03/13 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Plaintiff failed to respond to the December 4th Order by this

deadline. Therefore, Defendant Sharon Cross is dismissed from this

action without prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 3, 2013

 

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.

Senior United States District Judge

2

Case 2:12-cv-02244-GEB-JFM Document 13 Filed 01/03/13 Page 2 of 2