Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca8-10-01729/USCOURTS-ca8-10-01729-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
DeAngelo Singletary
Appellant
United States of America
Appellee

Document Text:

1

The Honorable Susan Webber Wright, United States District Judge for the

Eastern District of Arkansas. 

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 10-1729

___________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the

v. * Eastern District of Arkansas.

*

DeAngelo Singletary, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Appellant. *

___________

Submitted: August 5, 2010

Filed: August 6, 2010

___________

Before LOKEN, MURPHY, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

DeAngelo Singletary appeals following the district court’s1

 order revoking his

supervised release and imposing a revocation sentence of 11 months in prison. Upon

careful review, we conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in

revoking supervised release, see United States v. Edwards, 400 F.3d 591, 592 (8th Cir.

2005) (per curiam); and we also conclude that the revocation sentence is not

unreasonable, see 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(3), because the court properly considered

relevant sentencing factors, see 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a)(1) (considerations include history

Appellate Case: 10-1729 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/06/2010 Entry ID: 3691037
-2-

and characteristics of defendant), (a)(2)(D) (need to provide treatment in most

effective manner), (a)(4)(B) (applicable Guidelines policy statements); see also United

States v. Perkins, 526 F.3d 1107, 1110 (8th Cir. 2008) (specific findings on § 3553(a)

factors are not needed; all generally required is evidence that district court was aware

of relevant factors). 

Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court, and we grant

counsel’s motion to withdraw.

______________________________

Appellate Case: 10-1729 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/06/2010 Entry ID: 3691037