Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_03-cv-05231/USCOURTS-caed-1_03-cv-05231-4/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Tom L. Carey
Respondent
Ronald Edward West
Petitioner

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RONALD EDWARD WEST, )

)

)

Petitioner, )

)

v. )

)

)

TOM L. CAREY, )

)

)

Respondent. )

)

 )

1:03-cv-05231-LJO-TAG HC 

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND

RECOMMENDATION (Doc. 43)

ORDER DISMISSING AMENDED PETITION

FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS (Doc. 4)

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT

TO ENTER JUDGMENT

On February 24, 2003, Petitioner filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 2254 in this Court. (Doc. 1). On April 24, 2003, Petitioner filed an amended petition. 

(Doc. 4). 

On February 23, 2007, the Court attempted to send Petitioner an order regarding the

reassignment of the case to U.S. District Judge Lawrence J. O’Neill. (Doc. 41). On March 14,

2007, the mail as returned with the notation, “cannot locate.” (Doc. 42). On May 29, 2007, the

Court issued a Report and Recommendation to dismiss the amended petition for Petitioner’s

failure to prosecute the case. (Doc. 43). This Report and Recommendation was served on all

parties and contained notice that any objections were to be filed within twenty days from the date

Case 1:03-cv-05231-LJO-TAG Document 44 Filed 07/02/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

of service of that order. Moreover, the Report and Recommendation was sent to both

Petitioner’s current address of record as well as to an earlier street address in Turlock, California,

that Petitioner had previously sent to the Court. To date, the parties have not filed timely

objections to the Report and Recommendation.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted

a de novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court concludes that

the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation is supported by the record and proper

analysis. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Report and Recommendation, filed May 29, 2007 (Doc. 43), is ADOPTED

IN FULL;

2. The amended petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. 4), is DISMISSED; and

3. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to ENTER JUDGMENT and close the file. 

This order terminates the action in its entirety. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 2, 2007 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill 

b9ed48 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:03-cv-05231-LJO-TAG Document 44 Filed 07/02/07 Page 2 of 2