Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-00880/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-00880-2/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
American Express Cards
Defendant
Kamlesh Banga
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KAMLESH BANGA and MADAN LAL,

Plaintiff, 2:06-cv-0880-GEB-GGH-PS

vs.

AMERICAN EXPRESS CARDS,

and DOES 1 through 10 inclusive,

Defendants. ORDER

__________________________________/

On December 20, 2006, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations

herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the

findings and recommendations were to be filed within ten days. No objections were filed.

 Accordingly, the court presumes any findings of fact are correct. See Orland v.

United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1999). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are

reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir.

1983).

The court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and, good cause appearing,

concludes that it is appropriate to adopt the Proposed Findings and Recommendations in full.

\\\\\

Case 2:06-cv-00880-GEB-GGH Document 27 Filed 02/09/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that:

1. The Proposed Findings and Recommendations filed December 20, 2006, are

ADOPTED; 

2. Defendants’ motion to dismiss filed November 8, 2006, is GRANTED, and

this action is DISMISSED for lack of subject matter jurisdiction; and

3. Defendants’ motion to strike filed November 8, 2006, is DENIED as moot.

Dated: February 8, 2007

 

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.

United States District Judge

Case 2:06-cv-00880-GEB-GGH Document 27 Filed 02/09/07 Page 2 of 2