Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-06093/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-06093-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Fresno County Court
Defendant
Joseph Modrell
Petitioner

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOSEPH MODRELL, )

)

Petitioner, )

v. )

)

FRESNO COUNTY COURT, )

)

Respondent. )

)

____________________________________)

CV F 04- 6093 REC WMW HC

ORDER ADOPTING

FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS,

DISMISSING PETITION AND

DIRECTING ENTRY OF

JUDGMENT FOR

RESPONDENT

[Doc. 3]

Petitioner, a state prisoner, has filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 2254 . The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72-302. 

On March 17, 2006, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations herein. 

These findings and recommendations were served on the parties and contained notice to the

parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within thirty

days. No objections were filed. On March 27, 2006, Petitioner’s copy of the findings and

recommendations was returned by the United States Postal Service with the notation,

“unclaimed.” Service on a petitioner at his address of record is fully effective. Local Rule 83-

182(f). 

Case 1:04-cv-06093-REC-WMW Document 5 Filed 03/31/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 2

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)C) this court has conducted a

de novo review of this case. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454

(9 Cir. 1983). Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the findings and th

recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis. 

Based on the foregoing, it is HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations issued by the Magistrate Judge on 

March 17, 2006, are a adopted in full;

2. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is dismissed for failure to prosecute;

3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment for Respondent.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 29, 2006 /s/ Robert E. Coyle 

668554 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:04-cv-06093-REC-WMW Document 5 Filed 03/31/06 Page 2 of 2