Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_06-cv-02201/USCOURTS-cand-4_06-cv-02201-10/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Iconix, Inc.
Counter-defendant
Netpickle, Inc.
Counter-claimant
Jia Shen
Counter-claimant
Lance Tokuda
Counter-claimant

Document Text:

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

[PROPOSED] ORDER RE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT

CASE NO. C06-02201 SBA 

pa-1094102 

I. NEEL CHATTERJEE (STATE BAR NO. 173985) 

nchatterjee@orrick.com 

MICHAEL APARICIO (STATE BAR NO. 206300) 

maparicio@orrick.com 

DANIEL J. WEINBERG (STATE BAR NO. 227159) 

dweinberg@orrick.com 

ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP 

1000 Marsh Road 

Menlo Park, CA 94025 

Telephone: 650-614-7400 

Facsimile: 650-614-7401 

Attorneys for Defendants 

LANCE TOKUDA, JIA SHEN, AND NETPICKLE, INC. 

KENNETH A KUWAYTI (CA BAR NO. 145384) 

TIMUR ENGIN (CA BAR NO. 229944) 

SUSAN VASTANO VAUGHAN (CA BAR NO. 223576) 

kkuwayti@mofo.com 

MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP 

744 Page Mill Rd. 

Palo Alto CA 94304-1018 

Telephone: 650-813-5600 

Facsimile: 650-494-0792 

Attorneys for Plaintiff/Cross-defendant 

ICONIX, INC. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

OAKLAND DIVISION 

ICONIX, INC., 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

LANCE TOKUDA, JIA SHEN, and 

NETPICKLE, INC., 

Defendants. 

Case No. C06-02201 SBA (JCS) 

ORDER RE SECOND AMENDED 

COMPLAINT 

Judge: Hon. Saundra Brown Armstrong 

Case 4:06-cv-02201-SBA Document 146 Filed 09/11/06 Page 1 of 2
[PROPOSED] ORDER RE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT

CASE NO. C06-02201 SBA 

pa-1094102 

2

ORDER

Pursuant to the stipulation entered into by the parties filed September 8, 2006, and 

good cause having been shown, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 

1. Iconix be permitted to file its proposed Second Amended Complaint; 

2. On September 19, 2006, Defendants shall file a motion to dismiss or 

otherwise respond to the Second Amended Complaint; 

3. On October 3, 2006, Iconix shall file its opposition to Defendants’ motion 

to dismiss; 

4. On October 10, 2006, Defendants shall file their reply to Defendants’ 

motion to dismiss; 

5. Defendants’ motion to dismiss be scheduled for hearing on October 31, 

2006, 1:00 p.m.; and 

6. Defendants shall not be required to file a response to Iconix’s First 

Amended Complaint. 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: 9/11/06 

By: 

Honorable Saundra B. Armstrong 

 United States District Court Judge 

Case 4:06-cv-02201-SBA Document 146 Filed 09/11/06 Page 2 of 2