Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-00601/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-00601-5/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Gino Renard Caldwell
Plaintiff
R. E. Murphy
Defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GINO RENARD CALDWELL, 1:06-cv-00601-OWW-GSA-PC

Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS &

RECOMMENDATIONS

vs. (Doc. 17.)

R. E. MURPHY, ORDER FOR CASE TO PROCEED ONLY 

AGAINST DEFENDANT MURPHY ON

Defendant. EXCESSIVE FORCE AND DUE PROCESS

CLAIMS

ORDER DISMISSING RETALIATION CLAIM

_____________________________/

Gino Renard Caldwell (“plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil

rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate

Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ' 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72-302. 

 On August 13, 2008, findings and recommendations were entered, recommending

that this action proceed only against defendant Murphy on plaintiff's excessive force and due process

claims, and that plaintiff's retaliation claim be dismissed. Plaintiff was provided an opportunity to

file objections to the findings and recommendations within thirty days. To date, plaintiff has not

filed objections or otherwise responded to the findings and recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. ' 636 (b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 73-

305, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire

Case 1:06-cv-00601-OWW -GSA Document 22 Filed 09/30/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 2

file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and proper

analysis. 

Accordingly, THE COURT HEREBY ORDERS that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations issued by the Magistrate Judge on August 13,

2008, are adopted in full;

2. This action shall proceed only against defendant Murphy on plaintiff's excessive

force and due process claims; and

3. Plaintiff's retaliation claim is dismissed.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 30, 2008 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger 

emm0d6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-00601-OWW -GSA Document 22 Filed 09/30/08 Page 2 of 2