Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-00224/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-00224-3/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Tyrrall Farrow Cannon
Plaintiff
State of California
Defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TYRRALL FARROW CANNON,

et al.,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-05-0224 FCD GGH P

vs.

STATE OF CALIFORNIA,

Defendants. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

By order filed June 13, 2005, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed and thirty days

leave to file an amended complaint or a habeas petition, as appropriate, was granted. On July 18,

2005, plaintiff filed a request for reconsideration of the June 13 order. On July 29, 2005, Judge th

Damrell affirmed the June 13, 2005, order. To date, plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint

or a habeas corpus application.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed

without prejudice. See Local Rule 11-110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty

days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written

Case 2:05-cv-00224-FCD-GGH Document 15 Filed 01/11/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s

Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the

specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951

F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: 1/10/06 

/s/ Gregory G. Hollows

 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

GGH:035

cann0224.fta

Case 2:05-cv-00224-FCD-GGH Document 15 Filed 01/11/06 Page 2 of 2