Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca11-19-11910/USCOURTS-ca11-19-11910-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
C. Capela
Appellee
Daniel P. Hargrove
Appellant
Erika Shields
Appellee

Document Text:

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 19-11910

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D.C. Docket No. 1:19-cv-00971-AT

DANIEL P. HARGROVE, 

 Plaintiff-Appellant,

 versus

C. CAPELA,

#6022; Atlanta Police Department Inc.,

ERIKA SHIELDS, 

 Defendants-Appellees.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Georgia

________________________

(February 4, 2020)

Before WILLIAM PRYOR, LAGOA and HULL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: 

USCA11 Case: 19-11910 Date Filed: 02/04/2020 Page: 1 of 2
2

Daniel Hargrove appeals pro se the dismissal without prejudice of his 

complaint for failure to comply with an order to submit an amended application to 

proceed in forma pauperis or to pay a filing fee. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41. Hargrove 

disregarded a warning that his failure to comply with the order would result in the 

dismissal of his complaint, and he failed to object to a magistrate judge’s

recommendation to dismiss. On appeal, Hargrove has abandoned any challenge to 

the dismissal by failing to identify an error by the district court. See Hamilton v. 

Southland Christian Sch., Inc., 680 F.3d 1316, 1318–19 (11th Cir. 2012). Instead, 

he demands that we enter judgment in his favor. Because Hargrove fails to explain 

how the district court abused its discretion when it dismissed his complaint without 

prejudice, see Dynes v. Army Air Force Exch. Serv., 720 F.2d 1495, 1499 (11th

Cir. 1983), we affirm.

AFFIRMED.

USCA11 Case: 19-11910 Date Filed: 02/04/2020 Page: 2 of 2