Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-01278/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-01278-6/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Derral G. Adams
Respondent
Daniel Fernandez
Petitioner

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DANIEL FERNANDEZ, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

)

v. )

)

)

DERRAL G. ADAMS, )

)

Respondent. )

 )

1:07-cv-01278-OWW-TAG HC 

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATION

(Doc. 10)

ORDER DISMISSING AMENDED PETITION

FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

(Doc. 7)

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO

ENTER JUDGMENT

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. 

On May 30, 2008, the Magistrate Judge assigned to the case filed a Findings and

Recommendations recommending that the amended petition for writ of habeas corpus be

DISMISSED for failure to comply with the Court's orders. (Doc. 10). The Findings and

Recommendations was served on all parties and contained notice that any objections were to be filed

within twenty days from the date of service of that order. On July 30, 2008, after being granted

several extensions of time, Petitioner filed objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and

Recommendations. (Doc. 14). 

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a de

Case 1:07-cv-01278-OWW -JMD Document 16 Filed 08/15/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, including Petitioner's objections,

the Court concludes that the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation is supported by the

record and proper analysis. Petitioner's objections present no grounds for questioning the Magistrate

Judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendation issued May 30, 2008 (Doc. 10), is ADOPTED IN

FULL; 

2. The amended petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. 7) is DISMISSED; and

3. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to ENTER JUDGMENT for Respondent and close the

file.

This order terminates the action in its entirety.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 14, 2008 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger 

emm0d6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:07-cv-01278-OWW -JMD Document 16 Filed 08/15/08 Page 2 of 2