Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_15-cv-02379/USCOURTS-cand-4_15-cv-02379-2/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Bartels Property Management
Plaintiff
Mite Dumas
Defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BARTELS PROPERTY MANAGEMENT,

Plaintiff,

v.

MITE DUMAS,

Defendant.

Case No. 15-cv-02379-HSG 

ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH 

PREJUDICE

On September 9, 2015, the Court held a Case Management Conference at which neither

Defendant nor counsel for Defendant appeared. During that hearing, counsel for Plaintiff 

represented that defects in Defendant’s attempt to remove this action to federal court rendered the 

removal ineffective, that the proceeding already has been tried in state court and a judgment has 

issued there, and that Defendant had already vacated the residence from which she was evicted. 

On September 11, 2015, this Court ordered Defendant to show cause by October 2, 2015 as to 

why this case should not be dismissed with prejudice. Defendant failed to respond to the Court’s 

order to show cause. Accordingly, the case is dismissed with prejudice for failure to prosecute. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated:

______________________________________

HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR.

United States District Judge

10/27/2015

Case 4:15-cv-02379-HSG Document 17 Filed 10/27/15 Page 1 of 1