Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-08-01227/USCOURTS-ca4-08-01227-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Michael B. Mukasey
Respondent
Bedes Tamasang Ndenge
Petitioner

Document Text:

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-1227

BEDES TAMASANG NDENGE,

Petitioner,

v.

MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration

Appeals. 

Submitted: August 22, 2008 Decided: September 15, 2008

Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Bedes Tamasang Ndenge, Petitioner Pro Se. Andrew Brinkman, Craig

William Kuhn, Trial Attorney, Elizabeth Joanne Stevens, Senior

Litigation Counsel, M. Jocelyn Lopez Wright, Office of Immigration

Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C.,

for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 08-1227 Doc: 20 Filed: 09/15/2008 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Bedes Tamasang Ndenge, a native and citizen of Cameroon,

petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration

Appeals (“Board”) denying his second motion to reopen. We have

reviewed the record and the Board’s order and find that the Board

did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion. See 8 C.F.R.

§ 1003.2(a) (2008). Accordingly, although we grant leave to

proceed in forma pauperis, we deny the petition for review for the

reasons stated by the Board. See In re: Ndenge (B.I.A. Jan. 30,

2008). We deny Ndenge’s motion to reopen and remand to the

immigration judge. We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

Appeal: 08-1227 Doc: 20 Filed: 09/15/2008 Pg: 2 of 2