Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_05-cr-00547/USCOURTS-cand-4_05-cr-00547-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
USA
Plaintiff
Duke Deshawn Woods
Defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER

CR 04-372 VRW

KEVIN V. RYAN (CSBN 118321)

United States Attorney

EUMI L. CHOI (WVBN 0722) 

Chief, Criminal Division

SUSAN R. JERICH (CSBN 188462) 

Assistant United States Attorney

450 Golden Gate Avenue, Box 36055

San Francisco, California 94102

Telephone: (415) 436-7158

Facsimile: (415) 436-7234

Email: susan.jerich@usdoj.gov

Attorneys for Plaintiff

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) No.: CR 05 00547 PJH

)

Plaintiff, ) PARTIES’ STIPULATION AND 

) PROPOSED ORDER EXCLUDING 

v. ) TIME UNDER SPEEDY TRIAL ACT

)

DUKE DESHAWN WOODS, )

)

 Defendant. )

____________________________________) 

The parties stipulate and agree, and the Court finds and holds, as follows:

1. The parties last appeared before this Court on October 19, 2005 for case status. 

At that time, counsel for the defendant indicated that there were some items of discovery that he

had not received. Counsel also indicated that he was having difficulty reviewing visual media

that had been discovered to the defendant. 

2. The matter was continued until November 2, 2005 at 2:30 p.m. Time was excluded by the

Court for effective preparation of counsel. 

3. Government counsel was informed that the case agent obtained this additional discovery

on November 1, 2005. The discovery will be provided to counsel for the defendant immediately. 

4. Thus, since counsel for the defendant will not have sufficient to receive and review

Case 4:05-cr-00547-PJH Document 13 Filed 11/01/05 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER

CR 05-00547 PJH 2

discovery prior to the parties scheduled appearance on November 2, 2005, both parties are

requesting that the matter be continued so that defense counsel has enough time to review it and

discuss the matter with his client. Thus, both parties are requesting that the matter be continued

until November 30, 2005. 

5. The parties move that the time period from November 2, 2005 through November 30,

2005, be excluded from the calculation of time under the Speedy Trial Act due to effective

preparation of counsel. 

6. In light of the foregoing facts, the failure to grant the requested exclusion 

would unreasonably deny counsel for the defense the reasonable time necessary for effective

preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. See 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(A),

(B)(iv). The ends of justice would be served by the Court excluding the proposed time period. 

These ends outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. See id. §

3161(h)(8)(A). 

7. For the reasons stated, the time period from November 2, 2005 through November 30,

2005, shall be excluded from the calculation of time under the Speedy Trial Act. 

SO STIPULATED.

DATED: 11/01/05 Respectfully Submitted, 

_/s/______________________________

SUSAN R. JERICH

Assistant United States Attorney

DATED: 11/01/05

_/s/_______________________________

RONALD TYLER

Counsel for Defendant 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: __________________________________

HON. PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON

Judge, United States District Court

11/1/05

LAST CONTINUANCE

Case 4:05-cr-00547-PJH Document 13 Filed 11/01/05 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER

CR 05-00547 PJH 3

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned hereby certifies that a copy of the Parties’ Stipulation and Proposed

Order in the case of United States v. Duke Deshawn Woods No. CR 05-00547 PJH, was served

today as follows:

Hand Delivery

Ronald Tyler, Esq. 

Federal Public Defender’s Office

I certify under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.

Executed on November 1, 2005 at San Francisco, California.

 /s/ 

Rawaty Yim

United States Attorney’s Office

Case 4:05-cr-00547-PJH Document 13 Filed 11/01/05 Page 3 of 3