Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-01902/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-01902-3/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
California Wine Company
Plaintiff
Knightsbridge Fine Wines, Inc.
Defendant

Document Text:

Farella Braun & Martel LLP

Russ Building

235 Montgomery Street

San Francisco, CA 94104

(415) 954-4400

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND [PROPOSED]

ORDER

Case No. C-04-01902-EDL

-1- 18912\815169.1

Richard Van Duzer (State Bar No. 136205)

Ruth Ann Castro (State Bar No. 209448)

Farella Braun & Martel LLP

Russ Building

235 Montgomery Street

San Francisco, CA 94104

Telephone: (415) 954-4400

Facsimile: (415) 954-4480

Attorneys for Plaintiff

CALIFORNIA WINE COMPANY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CALIFORNIA WINE COMPANY, a

California corporation,

Plaintiff,

vs.

KNIGHTSBRIDGE FINE WINES, INC., a

Nevada corporation, and DOES 1 through

10,

Defendants.

Case No. C-04-01902-EDL

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Case 3:04-cv-01902-EDL Document 46 Filed 07/27/05 Page 1 of 2
Farella Braun & Martel LLP

Russ Building

235 Montgomery Street

San Francisco, CA 94104

(415) 954-4400

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND [PROPOSED]

ORDER

Case No. C-04-01902-EDL

-2- 18912\815169.1

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties to this action through their

designated counsel, that the above-captioned action be, and hereby is, dismissed in its entirety,

with prejudice, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure, Rule 41(a)(1). Each side to bear its

own fees and costs.

I attest that concurrence in the filing of the above Stipulation has been obtained from

counsel for Knightsbridge Wines, Inc.

DATED: July 21, 2005 FARELLA BRAUN & MARTEL LLP

By: /s/

Ruth Ann Castro

Attorneys for Plaintiff

CALIFORNIA WINE COMPANY

DATED: July 21, 2005 GAW VANMALE SMITH MYERS &

MIROGLIO

By: /s/

Bruce A. Miroglio

Attorneys for Defendant

KNIGHTSBRIDGE FINE WINES, INC.

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: _______________________

__________________________________

HON. MAGISTRATE JUDGE

ELIZABETH D. LAPORTE

July 27, 2005 U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte

Case 3:04-cv-01902-EDL Document 46 Filed 07/27/05 Page 2 of 2