Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca8-04-01255/USCOURTS-ca8-04-01255-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Anheuser-Busch
Appellee
Donnell W. Durley
Appellant

Document Text:

1

The Honorable Carol E. Jackson, Chief Judge, United States District Court for

the Eastern District of Missouri. 

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 04-1255

___________

Donnell W. Durley, *

*

Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the Eastern

* District of Missouri.

Anheuser-Busch, Inc., *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellee. *

___________

Submitted: October 29, 2004

Filed: November 4, 2004

___________

Before RILEY, McMILLIAN, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Donnell W. Durley appeals the district court’s1

 denial of his reconsideration

motion following dismissal of his Title VII action. Liberally construing his

reconsideration motion as a Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) motion filed more

than ten days after entry of final judgment, and liberally construing his appellate

briefs, we conclude the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying

reconsideration. See Sanders v. Clemco Indus., 862 F.2d 161, 164-65, 169 (8th Cir.

1988) (construing reconsideration motion filed more than 10 days after entry of

Appellate Case: 04-1255 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/04/2004 Entry ID: 1830245 
-2-

judgment under Rule 60(b); appeal from denial of Rule 60(b) motion does not raise

underlying judgment for review, and review is for abuse of discretion).

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________

Appellate Case: 04-1255 Page: 2 Date Filed: 11/04/2004 Entry ID: 1830245