Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_16-cv-01140/USCOURTS-caed-1_16-cv-01140-6/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
County of Tulare
Defendant
Maria Eva Martinez
Plaintiff
San Diego County
Defendant

Document Text:

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE DISCOVERY DEADLINES

CASE NO. 16-CV-01140-DAD-SKO

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ARTURO J. GONZÁLEZ (CA SBN 121490)

AGonzalez@mofo.com

CAITLIN SINCLAIRE BLYTHE (CA SBN 265024)

CBlythe@mofo.com

ALEXANDRA E. LAKS (CA SBN 291861)

ALaks@mofo.com

MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP

425 Market Street

San Francisco, California 94105-2482

Telephone: 415.268.7000

Attorneys for Plaintiff

MARIA EVA MARTINEZ

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MARIA EVA MARTINEZ,

Plaintiff,

v.

TULARE COUNTY, SAN DIEGO COUNTY, 

and DOES 1-100,

Defendants.

Case No. 16-cv-01140-DAD-SKO

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO 

CONTINUE DISCOVERY 

DEADLINES

Case 1:16-cv-01140-DAD-SKO Document 36 Filed 02/14/17 Page 1 of 4
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE DISCOVERY DEADLINES 1

CASE NO. 16-CV-01140-DAD-SKO

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 143, Plaintiff Maria Eva Martinez and Defendant County of 

San Diego (hereafter, the “parties”) through their undersigned counsel hereby stipulate as follows:

WHEREAS, the Court issued a Scheduling Order on December 2, 2016 (ECF 21);

WHEREAS, in the Scheduling Order the Court set the following discovery or discoveryrelated deadlines:

 Motions or stipulations requesting leave to amend the pleadings on February 1, 2017; 

 Close of Non Expert Discovery on February 24, 2017;

 Expert Disclosures on February 24, 2017;

 Rebuttal Expert Disclosures on February 28, 2017;

 Close of Expert Discovery on March 24, 2017;

 Mid-Discovery Status Report on February 2, 2017;

 Mid-Discovery Status Conference on February 9, 2017;

WHEREAS, the County of Tulare made an offer of judgment, which Plaintiff has 

accepted, resolving the dispute between the Plaintiff and the County of Tulare;

WHEREAS, the Court issued an order inadvertently closing the case on January 18, 2017

and vacating all dates;

WHEREAS, the Court issued an order re-opening the case as to Defendant County of San 

Diego, correcting the clerical error in the January 18, 2017 order closing the case, and inviting the 

parties to propose new case dates and deadlines; 

WHEREAS, the parties have met and conferred and agree that a short extension of the 

discovery and discovery-related dates is supported by good cause and is in the interests of justice.

NOW, THEREFORE, the parties, through their respective attorneys and subject to the 

approval of the Court, hereby stipulate and agree as follows:

The following discovery and discovery-related deadlines shall all be continued to the 

following dates:

1. Motions or stipulations requesting leave to amend the pleadings on May 1, 2017; 

2. Close of Non Expert Discovery on June 23, 2017;

3. Expert Disclosures on June 23, 2017;

Case 1:16-cv-01140-DAD-SKO Document 36 Filed 02/14/17 Page 2 of 4
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE DISCOVERY DEADLINES 2

CASE NO. 16-CV-01140-DAD-SKO

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

4. Rebuttal Expert Disclosures on June 28, 2017;

5. Close of Expert Discovery on July 21, 2017;

6. Mid-Discovery Status Report on April 6, 2017;

7. Mid-Discovery Status Conference on April 13, 2017;

In the parties’ mid-discovery status report, they will update the Court as to their progress 

with discovery and propose an agreed-upon full case schedule at that time (or their respective 

positions on a full case schedule, if an agreement cannot be reached).

By agreeing to the above continuation, the parties do not agree to forego any rights to seek 

additional relief related to the other party’s delay or failure to participate in discovery. 

Dated: February 10, 2017 ARTURO J. GONZÁLEZ

CAITLIN SINCLAIRE BLYTHE

ALEXANDRA E. LAKS

MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP

By: /s/ Arturo J. González

ARTURO J. GONZÁLEZ

Attorneys for Plaintiff

MARIA EVA MARTINEZ

Dated: February 10, 2017 THOMAS E. MONTGOMERY

COUNTY COUNSEL

By: /s/ Robert A. Ortiz

(as authorized 2/10/2017)

Robert A. Ortiz

Attorneys for Defendant

COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO

//

//

//

Case 1:16-cv-01140-DAD-SKO Document 36 Filed 02/14/17 Page 3 of 4
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE DISCOVERY DEADLINES 3

CASE NO. 16-CV-01140-DAD-SKO

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Based on the parties’ above-stipulation, the Court’s Scheduling Order (Doc. 21) is hereby 

MODIFIED as follows:

EVENT CURRENT DATE NEW DATE

Deadline for motions or stipulations 

requesting leave to amend the 

pleadings

February 1, 2017 May 1, 2017

Non-expert discovery deadline February 24, 2017 June 23, 2017

Expert disclosures February 24, 2017 June 23, 2017

Rebuttal expert disclosures February 28, 2017 June 28, 2017

Expert discovery deadline March 24, 2017 July 21, 2017

Mid-Discovery Status Report 

Deadline February 2, 2017 April 6, 2017

Mid-Discovery Status Conference February 9, 2017 April 13, 2017

It is further ORDERED that the non-dispositive motion deadlines, dispositive motion 

deadlines, pretrial conference, and trial dates are hereby VACATED and shall be set at the MidDiscovery Status Conference on April 13, 2017. In their Mid-Discovery Status Report, the 

parties shall propose dates for these events that are agreed to by all counsel.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 14, 2017 /s/ Sheila K. Oberto .

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:16-cv-01140-DAD-SKO Document 36 Filed 02/14/17 Page 4 of 4