Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_16-cv-00497/USCOURTS-caed-1_16-cv-00497-5/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Commissioner of Social Security
Defendant
Sylvia Estrada
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Plaintiff seeks judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security 

denying certain disability benefits. The matter was referred to the Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 

U.S.C. § 636(b) and Local Rule 302.

On June 29, 2016, the Magistrate Judge filed a Findings and Recommendation (“F&R”). 

The F&R recommended dismissing this case without prejudice due to a failure to prosecute. The 

F&R was served on all parties and contained notice that any objections to the findings and 

recommendations were to be filed within thirty (30) days of the date of service of the order. The 

period for filing objections has now passed, and no objections have been filed.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), this Court has conducted a de 

novo review. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, including the objections, the Court finds 

that the F&R is supported by the record and proper analysis. The F&R will be adopted in full.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the F&R issued June 29, 2016 (Doc. No.

11), is ADOPTED IN FULL and this case is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to 

prosecute.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 5, 2016 

 SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE

SYLVIA ESTRADA,

Plaintiff

v.

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL 

SECURITY,

Defendant

CASE NO. 1:16-CV-0497AWI SAB 

AMENDED ORDER ON MAGISTRATE 

JUDGE’S FINDINGS AND 

RECOMMENDATION

(Doc. No. 11)

Case 1:16-cv-00497-AWI-SAB Document 14 Filed 08/05/16 Page 1 of 1