Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca10-09-01127/USCOURTS-ca10-09-01127-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Humberto Fierro-Rascon
Appellant
United States of America
Appellee

Document Text:

*

 This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the

doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. It may be cited,

however, for its persuasive value consistent with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 and 10th

Cir. R. 32.1.

FILED

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

June 7, 2010

Elisabeth A. Shumaker

Clerk of Court

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, No. 09-1127

v. (D.C. No. 08-CR-00245-WYD-1)

HUMBERTO FIERRO-RASCON,

a/k/a Fernando Ramirez, a/k/a

Humberto Fierro, a/k/a/ Humberto

Aragon-Rascon,

(D. Colo.)

Defendant-Appellant.

 

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

Before KELLY, McKAY, and LUCERO, Circuit Judges.

After examining defense counsel’s Anders brief and the appellate record,

this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially

assist in the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir.

R. 34.1(G). This case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

Appellant Humberto Fierro-Rascon, a federal prisoner represented by

counsel, pled guilty to unlawfully reentering the country as a deported alien

previously convicted of an aggravated felony. The district court denied

Appellate Case: 09-1127 Document: 01018435493 Date Filed: 06/07/2010 Page: 1 
-2-

Appellant’s motion for a downward departure from the sentencing guidelines and

imposed a sentence of thirty-three months, at the bottom of the applicable

guideline range. Appellant then filed a pro se notice of appeal and requested the

appointment of counsel for his appeal. On appeal, appointed counsel has filed an

Anders brief and motion to withdraw as counsel. See Anders v. California, 386

U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel concludes there are no potentially meritorious issues

that may be raised on appeal.

As required by Anders, we have conducted a full examination of the record

before us. See id. at 744. We agree with defense counsel that any potential

issues regarding the effectiveness of Appellant’s counsel should be raised in

collateral proceedings, see United States v. Brooks, 438 F.3d 1231, 1242 (10th

Cir. 2006), and the record reveals no other basis for an attack on the entry of

Appellant’s plea of guilty. As for the sentence imposed, the record indicates the

district court was aware of its discretion to depart downward but determined a

downward departure was not warranted in this case. Under these circumstances,

we lack jurisdiction to review the court’s denial of Appellant’s motion for a

downward departure. See United States v. Sierra-Castillo, 405 F.3d 932, 936

(10th Cir. 2005). The record also reveals no procedural defects in the district

court’s calculation of the applicable guideline range. Finally, as to the

substantive reasonableness of Appellant’s sentence, we agree with defense

counsel that the record contains nothing that would rebut the presumption of

Appellate Case: 09-1127 Document: 01018435493 Date Filed: 06/07/2010 Page: 2 
-3-

reasonableness attached to Appellant’s within-guidelines sentence. See United

States v. Haley, 529 F.3d 1308, 1311 (10th Cir. 2008). 

After thoroughly reviewing the record on appeal, we conclude that

Appellant has no non-frivolous grounds to raise on appeal. We therefore GRANT

counsel’s motion to withdraw and DISMISS the appeal. 

Entered for the Court

Monroe G. McKay

Circuit Judge

Appellate Case: 09-1127 Document: 01018435493 Date Filed: 06/07/2010 Page: 3