Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_15-cv-01102/USCOURTS-caed-1_15-cv-01102-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Chris Jones
Plaintiff
Target Corporation
Defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CHRIS JONES, an individual,

Plaintiff,

v.

TARGET CORPORATION, a Minnesota 

corporation, and DOES 1-100, inclusive,

Defendants.

No. 1:15-CV-01102-DAD-BAM

ORDER DISMISSING ACTION AND 

CLOSING CASE

(Merced Superior Court Case No. 15CV-01595)

(Doc. No. 17)

On December 21, 2015, the parties filed a joint stipulation dismissing this action with 

prejudice, with each party to bear its own costs and attorneys’ fees with this court retaining 

continuing jurisdiction to interpret and enforce the provisions of the settlement and release 

agreement executed by the parties. (Doc. No. 17.) 

In light of the stipulation of the parties, this case has terminated, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 

41(a)(1); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997), and is hereby 

DISMISSED with prejudice and without an award of attorneys’ fees and costs to either party. 

This court shall specifically retain continuing jurisdiction to interpret and enforce the provisions 

/////

Case 1:15-cv-01102-DAD-BAM Document 18 Filed 12/23/15 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

of the settlement and release agreement executed by the parties. The court directs the Clerk of 

Court to close this case. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: December 22, 2015 

 DALE A. DROZD

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:15-cv-01102-DAD-BAM Document 18 Filed 12/23/15 Page 2 of 2