Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-04801/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-04801-2/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
California Strawberry Commission
Plaintiff
Regents of the University of California, The
Defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CALIFORNIA STRAWBERRY 

COMMISSION,

Plaintiff,

v.

REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF 

CALIFORNIA, THE,

Defendant.

Case No. 14-cv-04801-JST 

MINUTE ORDER NOTING DISMISSAL

Re: ECF Nos. 30, 32, 33

The parties filed a stipulation of dismissal dated February 11, 2015, stating that they have 

agreed to a settlement of this action. ECF No. 30. Since the stipulation was signed by all parties 

who have appeared, it was effective without court order pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil 

Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). Nonetheless, pursuant to the stipulation, the Court entered a minute 

entry noting that the case had been dismissed with prejudice and directing the Clerk to close the 

file. ECF No. 32. 

Defendant Cross-Complainant Regents of the University of California (“Defendant”) now 

asks the Court to clarify that, although the Commission’s First Amended Complaint is dismissed 

with prejudice, Defendant’s Cross-Complaint is dismissed without prejudice. ECF No. 33. 

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i), this Notice is also effective without 

court order. The Clerk shall close the file.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated:

______________________________________

JON S. TIGAR

United States District Judge

February 17, 2015

Case 3:14-cv-04801-JST Document 35 Filed 02/17/15 Page 1 of 1