Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-08-01111/USCOURTS-ca4-08-01111-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
R. Harcourt Fulton
Appellee
James Hammond
Appellee
Randy L. Thomas
Appellant

Document Text:

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-1111

RANDY L. THOMAS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

R. HARCOURT FULTON; JAMES HAMMOND,

Defendants - Appellees.

No. 08-1292

RANDY L. THOMAS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

R. HARCOURT FULTON; JAMES HAMMOND,

Defendants - Appellees.

No. 08-1325

RANDY L. THOMAS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

Appeal: 08-1111 Doc: 24 Filed: 07/22/2008 Pg: 1 of 3
- 2 -

R. HARCOURT FULTON; JAMES HAMMOND,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western

District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Senior

District Judge. (3:07-cv-00200-GCM)

Submitted: June 26, 2008 Decided: July 22, 2008

Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Randy L. Thomas, Appellant Pro Se. Sardar Mujeeb Shah-Khan, CITY

ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, Charlotte, North Carolina; Mark Weston Johnson,

MCGUIREWOODS, LLP, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 08-1111 Doc: 24 Filed: 07/22/2008 Pg: 2 of 3
- 3 -

PER CURIAM:

In these consolidated appeals, Randy L. Thomas appeals

the district court’s orders entered in his action filed pursuant to

42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000), which (1) granted the motions to dismiss

filed by R. Harcourt Fulton and James Hammond (No. 08-1111);

(2) denied Thomas’ motions filed pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)

(No. 08-1292); and (3) reimposed a prefiling injunction on remand

(No. 08-1325). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court. Thomas v. Fulton, No. 3:07-cv-00200-GCM (W.D.N.C.

Dec. 11, 2007; Feb. 4, 2008; Feb. 13, 2008). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Appeal: 08-1111 Doc: 24 Filed: 07/22/2008 Pg: 3 of 3