Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-02838/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-02838-2/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Collabrx, Inc.
Plaintiff
The Jackson Laboratory
Defendant

Document Text:

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER ON BRIEFING SCHEDULE 

AND INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 

Case No. 3:16-cv-02838-EMC 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Jeffrey W. Shopoff (Bar No. 46278)

Gregory S. Cavallo (Bar No. 173270) 

James M. Robinson (Bar No. 238063) 

SHOPOFF CAVALLO & KIRSCH LLP 

601 Montgomery Street, Suite 1110 

San Francisco, CA 94111 

Telephone: (415) 984-1975 

Facsimile: (415) 984-1978 

Attorneys for Plaintiff, 

COLLABRX, INC. 

Andrew N. Thomases (Bar No. 177339)

Henry Y. Huang (Bar No. 252832) 

ROPES & GRAY LLP 

1900 University Avenue, 6th Floor 

East Palo Alto, CA 94303-2284 

Tel: (650) 617-4000 

Fax: (650) 617-4090 

Christine Ezzell Singer (pro hac vice) 

ROPES & GRAY LLP 

1211 Avenue of the Americas 

New York, NY 10036 

Tel: (212) 596-9208 

Fax: (212) 596-9090 

Attorneys for Defendant, 

THE JACKSON LABORATORY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

COLLABRX, INC., a Delaware corporation, 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

THE JACKSON LABORATORY, a Maine 

non-profit corporation, 

 Defendant. 

)

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

)

Case No. 3:16-cv-02838-EMC 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER ON BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND 

INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT 

CONFERENCE 

Case 3:16-cv-02838-EMC Document 45 Filed 11/14/16 Page 1 of 3
1 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER ON BRIEFING SCHEDULE 

AND INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 

Case No. 3:16-cv-02838-EMC 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION 

Plaintiff CollabRx, Inc. (“CollabRx”) and Defendant The Jackson Laboratory (“JAX”), 

through their counsel, hereby stipulate and agree that: 

WHEREAS, on August 29, 2016, CollabRx filed its First Amended Complaint; 

WHEREAS, on October 28, 2016, JAX filed a motion to dismiss CollabRx’s First 

Amended Complaint, with a response due by November 14, 2016, a reply due by November 21, 

2016, and a hearing date of December 15, 2016 (ECF No. 40); 

WHEREAS, the Court has currently set the initial case management conference for 

December 15, 2016 (ECF No. 43); 

WHEREAS, due to the parties’ respective schedules for December and the potential 

efficiency of allowing the Court time to resolve JAX’s motion to dismiss before proceeding 

with the initial case management conference and corresponding pretrial and discovery 

deadlines, the parties have agreed to extend the time for briefing and hearing on JAX’s motion 

to dismiss and the initial case management conference; 

WHEREAS, two prior time modifications have been requested and entered in this case 

(ECF Nos. 19, 38), no case schedule has been entered, and the parties’ agreed time 

modifications would not affect any case schedule other than continuing the initial case 

management conference; 

NOW, THEREFORE, the parties, through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate, 

subject to the Court’s approval, that: (1) CollabRx’s response to JAX’s motion to dismiss be due 

December 2, 2016; (2) JAX’s reply be due December 20, 2016; (3) the hearing on JAX’s 

motion to dismiss be continued to January 12, 2016; and (4) the initial case management 

conference be continued to February 9, 2016. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

 

Case 3:16-cv-02838-EMC Document 45 Filed 11/14/16 Page 2 of 3
2 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE 

INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 

Case No. 3:16-cv-02838-EMC 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Dated: November 10, 2016 By /s/ Gregory S. Cavallo

Gregory S. Cavallo 

SHOPOFF CAVALLO & KIRSCH LLP 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

COLLABRX, INC. 

/s/ Andrew Thomases

Andrew Thomases 

ROPES & GRAY LLP 

Attorneys for Defendant 

THE JACKSON LABORATORY

In accordance with Local Rule 5-1, the filer of this document hereby attests that the 

concurrence to the filing of this document has been obtained from the other signatories hereto. 

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: __________________________ _______________________________ 

 Edward M. Chen 

 United States District Judge 

11/14/16

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Edward M. Chen

Case 3:16-cv-02838-EMC Document 45 Filed 11/14/16 Page 3 of 3