Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-04102/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-04102-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Evelyn Ryan
Plaintiff
Sandia Corporation
Defendant

Document Text:

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE OF 

DEFENDANTS’ CONTINUED MOTION AND MOTION TO DISMISS – Case No. 15-cv-04102-CRB

1

1

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28

Siegel, 

LeWitter & 

Malkani 

1939 Harrison Street 

Suite 307 

Oakland, CA 94612 

510-452-5000 

510-452-5004 (fax) 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

EVELYN RYAN, 

Plaintiff, 

 v. 

SANDIA CORPORATION d/b/a SANDIA 

NATIONAL LABORATORIES and DOES 1 

through 10, inclusive, 

Defendants. 

 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

) 

) 

)

)

) 

Case No. 15-cv-04102-CRB

STIPULATION AND ORDER

REGARDING BRIEFING 

SCHEDULE OF DEFENDANT’S 

CONTINUED MOTION AND MOTION 

TO DISMISS PURSUANT TO FRCP 

12(b)(6) AND LOCAL RULE 7-7(d) 

Complaint Filed: July 15, 2015 

Trial Date: None set 

NOW come the Parties by and through their counsels and stipulate to the following 

briefing schedule regarding Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss, which was previously noticed for 

November 13, 2015 and is now noticed for December 11, 2015: 

Opposition by Plaintiff to be filed by October 7, 2015. (Opposition date set by the Court 

for the hearing of November 13, 2015 was on September 30, 2015). 

Reply by Defendant to be filed on October 14, 2015. (Reply date set by the court for the 

original motion was October 7, 2015). 

The Parties stipulate that there is good cause for the extension of the time to file an 

opposition and reply by one week for the reasons, inter alia, that Plaintiff’s counsel has a motion 

for summary judgment due on September 30, 2015 in another case, and other work obligations 

Jody I. LeWitter (SBN 124794) 

Jean R. Krasilnikoff (SBN 280450) 

SIEGEL LEWITTER MALKANI 

1939 Harrison Street, Suite 307

Oakland, California 94612 

Phone: 510-452-5000 

Fax: 510-452-5004 

jlewitter@sl-employmentlaw.com

jkrasilnikoff@sl-employmentlaw.com

Attorneys for Plaintiff EVELYN RYAN 

Case 3:15-cv-04102-CRB Document 18 Filed 09/25/15 Page 1 of 2
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE OF 

DEFENDANTS’ CONTINUED MOTION AND MOTION TO DISMISS – Case No. 15-cv-04102-CRB

2

1

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28

Siegel, 

LeWitter & 

Malkani 

1939 Harrison Street 

Suite 307 

Oakland, CA 94612 

510-452-5000 

510-452-5004 (fax) 

which provide good cause for moving the date by one week, the same amount of time will still be 

provided to Defendant to file its reply, and the same amount of time will be provided to the Court 

to review the papers, as the hearing date has been changed from November 13, 2015 to December 

11, 2015. 

 Respectfully submitted, 

DATED: September 21, 2015 SIEGEL LEWITTER MALKANI 

By: /s/ Jody I. LeWitter 

 Jody I. LeWitter 

 Jean R. Krasilnikoff 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

DATED: September 21, 2015 OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & 

STEWART, P.C. 

By: /s/ Danielle Ochs 

 Danielle Ochs 

 Rachel J. Moroski 

Attorneys for Plaintiff Defendant 

SIGNATURE ATTESTATION

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I attest that concurrence in the filing of this 

document has been obtained from the other signatories. 

DATED: September 21, 2015 By: /s/ Jody I. LeWitter 

ORDER 

This matter having come before the Court upon the stipulation of the parties pursuant to 

Local Rule 7-7(d) and good cause having been provided, it is hereby ordered that the opposition 

by Plaintiff shall be filed by October 7, 2015, and Defendant’s Reply shall be filed by October 14, 

2015. 

DATED: ____________________ __________________________________ 

 Hon. Charles R. Breyer 

Sept. 25, 2015

Case 3:15-cv-04102-CRB Document 18 Filed 09/25/15 Page 2 of 2