Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_17-cv-01661/USCOURTS-cand-4_17-cv-01661-14/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Timothy Aboudara, Jr.
Plaintiff
City of Santa Rosa
Defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER APPROVING SETTLEMENT Aboudara v. City of Santa Rosa 

AGREEMENT AND DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE Case No. 4:17-cv-01661-HSG 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

Case No: 4:17-cv-01661-HSG 

Complaint Filed: March 27, 2017 

ORDER APPROVING SETTLEMENT 

AGREEMENT AND DISMISSING CASE 

WITH PRJEUDICE 

TIMOTHY ABOUDARA, JR., on behalf of 

herself and all similarly situated individuals, 

 Plaintiffs, 

 v. 

CITY OF SANTA ROSA, 

 

 Defendant. 

 

)

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

)

ORDER 

The Court has carefully reviewed the Settlement Agreement, the Joint Stipulation for 

Approval of Settlement Agreement and Dismissal of Case, and the declarations submitted in 

support thereof. Based upon a review of the record, and good cause appearing, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED as follows: 

1. The Settlement Agreement submitted to the Court as Exhibit A to the Declaration 

of David E. Mastagni, which is incorporated herein by reference, is approved as fair, reasonable 

and just in all respects as to the Plaintiffs, including the award of attorneys’ fees and costs; 

2. Plaintiffs and Defendant City of Santa Rosa (“Defendant”) (collectively “Parties”) 

Case 4:17-cv-01661-HSG Document 120 Filed 05/10/19 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER APPROVING SETTLEMENT Aboudara v. City of Santa Rosa 

AGREEMENT AND DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE Case No. 4:17-cv-01661-HSG 

shall fully abide by and perform the Settlement Agreement in its entirety and in accordance with 

its terms; 

3. The Court reserves jurisdiction over the above-captioned matter for the purposes 

of enforcing the Settlement Agreement only; 

4. The Court has made no findings or determinations regarding the law, and none of 

the materials or documents prepared or submitted in support of the Parties’ Joint Stipulation for 

Approval of Settlement and Dismissal of Case shall constitute evidence of, or any admission of, 

any violation of law; 

5. Judgment is entered in this Action and this Action is hereby dismissed WITH 

PREJUDICE. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: May 10, 2019 ________________________________________ 

HONORABLE HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 4:17-cv-01661-HSG Document 120 Filed 05/10/19 Page 2 of 2