Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_08-cv-01228/USCOURTS-caed-1_08-cv-01228-12/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Derral G. Adams
Defendant
Marco De Puente-Hudson
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MARCO DE PUENTE-HUDSON,

Plaintiff,

v.

DERRAL G. ADAMS,

Defendant.

 /

CASE NO. 1:08-cv-01228-OWW-GSA PC

AMENDED ORDER GRANTING

PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR INSTRUCTION

ON OBLIGATION TO OPPOSE MOTIONS

FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

(Doc. 43)

Plaintiff Marcos De Puente-Hudson is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights

action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Defendant Derral G. Adams removed this action from Kings

County Superior Court on August 19, 2008, and pursuant to the Court’s order of February 19, 2009,

this action is proceeding on Plaintiff’s complaint, filed August 19, 2008, against Defendant Adams

for enacting a magazine policy that violates the First Amendment of the United States Constitution.

On March 29, 2010, Plaintiff filed a Motion/Request for the Court to Instruct Plaintiff of His

Obligation to Oppose a Motion for Summary Judgment. (Doc. 43.) While Plaintiff was served with

the First Informational Order, because this case was opened in this Court via removal, the Second

Informational Order has not yet issued. Instruction on obligations to oppose motions for summary

judgment are found in the Second Informational Order. Out of an abundance of caution, a First

Informational Order will be re-served on Plaintiff and a Second Informational Order will issue

concurrently herewith.

1

Case 1:08-cv-01228-OWW -GSA Document 47 Filed 04/05/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Accordingly, it is HEREBYORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for Instruction on Obligation

to Oppose Motions for Summary Judgment is GRANTED; and the Clerk’s Office shall re-serve a

First Informational Order on all parties in this proceeding.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: April 5, 2010 /s/ Gary S. Austin 

b742a4 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

2

Case 1:08-cv-01228-OWW -GSA Document 47 Filed 04/05/10 Page 2 of 2