Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-01419/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-01419-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Maltuzi LLC
Defendant
Microsoft Corporation
Plaintiff

Document Text:

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SILICON VALLEY

MASTER FILE NO. C-07-1419-VRW 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING 

TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

LATHAM & WATKINS LLP 

 Matthew Rawlinson (SBN 231890) 

 matthew.rawlinson@lw.com 

 Matthew Titolo (SBN 239049) 

 matthew.titolo@lw.com 

140 Scott Drive 

Menlo Park, California 94025 

Telephone: (650) 328-4600 

Facsimile: (650) 463-2600 

Attorneys for Defendant Maltuzi LLC 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

MICROSOFT CORPORATION, a 

Washington corporation, 

Plaintiff, 

MALTUZI LLC, a California corporation. 

Defendant. 

MASTER FILE NO. C-07-1419-VRW 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO 

RESPOND TO COMPLAINT 

Judge: The Honorable Vaughn R. Walker 

 

Case 3:07-cv-01419-VRW Document 13 Filed 03/30/07 Page 1 of 3
ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SILICON VALLEY

MASTER FILE NO. C-07-1419-VRW 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING 

TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT 

1

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

WHEREAS, Defendant Maltuzi LLC’s (“Defendant’s”) response to Plaintiff’s 

Complaint for Damages and Equitable Relief in the above-captioned matter is currently due on 

April 11; 

WHEREAS, the response date contemplated by this Stipulation is intended to allow 

counsel for Defendant sufficient time to prepare its responses; 

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between undersigned 

counsel for the parties that Defendant’s responses to the Complaint shall be due on May 2, 2007. 

DATED: March 27, 2007 

 LATHAM & WATKINS LLP 

By: /s/ 

Matthew Rawlinson 

Attorneys for Defendant Maltuzi LLC 

KIRKPATRICK & LOCKHART PRESTON 

GATES ELLIS LLP 

By: /s/ 

Rachel Davidson 

Attorneys for Plaintiff Microsoft Corporation 

Filer’s Attestation: Pursuant to General Order No. 45, Section X(B) regarding signatures, 

Matthew Rawlinson hereby attests that concurrence in the filing of this document has been 

obtained. 

Case 3:07-cv-01419-VRW Document 13 Filed 03/30/07 Page 2 of 3
ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SILICON VALLEY

MASTER FILE NO. C-07-1419-VRW 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING 

TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT 

2

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

ORDER

 Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing, Defendant shall have 

until May 2, 2007 to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: _________________ 

____________________________________ 

The Honorable Vaughn R. Walker 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

March 30, 2007

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Vaughn R Walker

Case 3:07-cv-01419-VRW Document 13 Filed 03/30/07 Page 3 of 3