Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-01416/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-01416-2/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Fowler Unified School District
Defendant
Jonathan Carl Coch Simonian
Plaintiff

Document Text:

MCCORMICK, BARSTOW, 

SHEPPARD, WAYTE & 

CARRUTH LLP 

CENTRE PLAZA OFFICE TOWER

1150 NINTH STREET, SUITE 1200 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 

49912/00047-1194346.v1 

ORDER ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (FED. R. CIV. P. 56(C)) 1:06-CV-01416-OWW-GSA 

Jeffrey R. Olson, # 120945 

Kelley Moran, # 222748 

McCormick, Barstow, Sheppard, 

Wayte & Carruth LLP 

Centre Plaza Office Tower 

1150 Ninth Street, Suite 1200 

Modesto, CA 95354 

Telephone: (209) 524-1100 

Facsimile: (209) 524-1188 

Attorneys for Defendant 

FOWLER UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT 

(SPACE BELOW FOR FILING STAMP ONLY) 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

JONATHAN CARL COCH SIMONIAN, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

FOWLER UNIFIED SCHOOL 

DISTRICT, 

Defendant. 

Case No. 1:06-CV-01416-OWW-GSA 

ORDER ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY 

JUDGMENT (Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(c)) 

On November 19, 2007 and January 28, 2008, the motion of Defendant FOWLER 

UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT’s (“Defendant”) for summary judgment (Doc 21) was duly heard 

before U. S. District Judge Oliver W. Wanger in Courtroom 3 (7th Floor), United States 

Courthouse, 2500 Tulare Street, Fresno, CA 93721. At said hearing on January 28, 2008 the 

matter was deemed submitted for decision, all except for Defendant filing reference to evidence 

in support of California Education Code § 48915(b)(1), which was filed (Doc 53) on January, 29, 

2008. 

The court has considered the papers submitted in favor of and opposed to the motion, has 

reviewed the authorities cited by the parties, has reviewed the record in the case submitted and 

cited by the parties, and has considered the arguments of counsel. Being so informed, the court is 

of the opinion there is no genuine issue as to any material fact in this matter and that Defendant is 

entitled, as a matter of law, to the judgment requested in this motion. (Doc 55) Therefore, 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 1:06-cv-01416-OWW -GSA Document 57 Filed 03/06/08 Page 1 of 2
MCCORMICK, BARSTOW, 

SHEPPARD, WAYTE & 

CARRUTH LLP 

CENTRE PLAZA OFFICE TOWER

1150 NINTH STREET, SUITE 1200 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 

49912/00047-1194346.v1 2 

ORDER ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (FED. R. CIV. P. 56(C)) 1:06-CV-01416-OWW-GSA 

IT IS ORDERED that: 

1. Defendant’s motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED; 

2 The Clerk of this court will enter judgment, dismissing this action in its entirety, 

with prejudice, and awarding Defendant its costs of suit as taxed by the clerk; 

3 All relief not expressly granted is denied. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: March 5, 2008 

/s/ OLIVER W. WANGER 

The Honorable Oliver W. Wanger 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 1:06-cv-01416-OWW -GSA Document 57 Filed 03/06/08 Page 2 of 2