Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_16-cv-00779/USCOURTS-caed-1_16-cv-00779-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Jose Acosta
Plaintiff
Apex Building Material Supply, Inc.
Defendant
Emmons Sebenius
Defendant
Janet K. Sebenius
Defendant

Document Text:

STIPULATION FOR CONTINUANCE OF MANDATORY SCHEDULING CONFERENCE; 

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Page 1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Tanya E. Moore, SBN 206683

Zachary M. Best, SBN 166035

MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C.

332 North Second Street

San Jose, California 95112

Telephone (408) 298-2000

Facsimile (408) 298-6046

Email: service@moorelawfirm.com

Attorneys for Plaintiff

Jose Acosta

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOSE ACOSTA,

Plaintiff,

vs.

APEX BUILDING MATERIAL SUPPLY, 

INC., et al.,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. 1:16-cv-00779-DAD-EPG

STIPULATION FOR FURTHER

CONTINUANCE OF MANDATORY 

SCHEDULING CONFERENCE; 

ORDER THEREON

WHEREAS, Plaintiff, Jose Acosta (“Plaintiff”), and Defendants, Apex Building 

Material Supply, Inc.; Emmons Sebenius; and Janet K. Sebenius (collectively “Defendants,” 

and together with Plaintiff, “the Parties”), previously stipulated to a continuance of the 

Mandatory Scheduling Conference (“MSC”) in this matter (Dkt. 5), and the Court granted the 

stipulation such that the MSC is now set for November 28, 2016 (Dkt. 6); 

WHEREAS, the Parties have been continuing to engage in settlement discussions, and 

are optimistic that an informal settlement will be reached, but Defendants require additional 

time to determine whether they will be able to complete the requested accessibility 

improvements or in the alternative, will close the subject facility to the public;

//

Case 1:16-cv-00779-DAD-EPG Document 10 Filed 11/22/16 Page 1 of 2
STIPULATION FOR CONTINUANCE OF MANDATORY SCHEDULING CONFERENCE; 

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Page 2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WHEREAS, the Parties desire to fully exhaust settlement efforts before incurring the 

fees and costs associated with the Scheduling Conference, and to conserve Court resources;

NOW, THEREFORE, Plaintiff and Defendants, by and through their respective counsel, 

stipulate to a further continuance of the Mandatory Scheduling Conference currently set for 

November 28, 2016 to a date at the Court’s convenience on or after January 17, 2017.

Dated: November 18, 2016 MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C.

/s/ Tanya E. Moore 

 Tanya E. Moore

Attorneys for Plaintiff, 

Jose Acosta

Dated: November 18, 2016 COLEMAN & HOROWITT, LLP

/s/ Keith M. White 

 Keith M. White

Attorneys for Defendants,

Apex Building Material Supply, Inc.; Emmons 

Sebenius; and Janet K. Sebenius

ORDER

The parties having so stipulated and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Mandatory Scheduling Conference currently set for 

November 28, 2016 is continued to February 1, 2017 at 10:00 am, before Magistrate Judge 

Erica P. Grosjean. The parties are to file their Joint Scheduling Report no later than seven days 

prior to the conference. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: November 21, 2016 /s/

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:16-cv-00779-DAD-EPG Document 10 Filed 11/22/16 Page 2 of 2