Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_01-cv-03650/USCOURTS-cand-3_01-cv-03650-4/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Jay Lapine
Defendant
Securities And Exchange Commission
Plaintiff

Document Text:

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE

COMMISSION,

Plaintiff,

 v.

JAY LAPINE,

Defendant. /

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE

COMMISSION,

Plaintiff, 

 v.

CHARLES McCALL,

Defendant. /

No. C 01-03650 WHA

Consolidated with:

No. C 03-02603 WHA

REQUEST FOR RESPONSE

In light of the acquittal of defendant Jay Lapine in United States v. McCall, et al., No.

CR 00-0505 WHA, the SEC was ordered to show cause why the above-captioned action

against defendant Lapine should not be dismissed. The Court is in receipt of the SEC’s

submission addressing the evidence upon which it intends to rely at trial. Defendant Lapine is

ordered to respond in writing to the SEC’s submission on or before NOON ON JANUARY 19,

2010. Defendant Lapine’s response should be no more than 25 pages. Any reply by the SEC 

Case 3:01-cv-03650-WHA Document 92 Filed 01/08/10 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

should be no more than 12 pages and must be received on or before NOON ON JANUARY 22,

2010.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 8, 2010. WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:01-cv-03650-WHA Document 92 Filed 01/08/10 Page 2 of 2