Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-06512/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-06512-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Richard L. Guess
Petitioner
USA
Respondent

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RICHARD L. GUESS, )

)

Petitioner, )

v. )

)

USA, )

)

Respondent. )

)

____________________________________)

CV F 04-6512 REC WMW HC

ORDER ADOPTING

FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS ,

DISMISSING PETITION, AND

DIRECTING CLERK TO

ENTER JUDGMENT FOR

RESPONDENT

[Docs. 6, 7]

Petitioner, a federal prisoner, has filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 2241 . The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72-302. 

On March 17, 2006, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations herein. 

These findings and recommendations were served on the parties and contained notice to the

parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within thirty

days. On March 27, 2006, Petitioner filed a request that this case be dismissed.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)C) this court has conducted a

de novo review of this case. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454

(9 Cir. 1983). Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the findings and th

recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis. 

Case 1:04-cv-06512-REC-WMW Document 9 Filed 03/29/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 2

Based on the foregoing, it is HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations issued by the Magistrate Judge on 

 March 17, 2006, are a adopted in full;

2. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is dismissed for Petitioner’s failure to prosecute;

3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment for Respondent.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 29, 2006 /s/ Robert E. Coyle 

668554 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:04-cv-06512-REC-WMW Document 9 Filed 03/29/06 Page 2 of 2