Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_13-cv-01922/USCOURTS-caed-2_13-cv-01922-6/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Conservation Congress
Plaintiff
United States Fish and Wildlife Service
Defendant
United States Forest Service
Defendant

Document Text:

STIPULATION & ORDER FOR 90 DAY CONTINUANCE - 1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

Rachel Fazio (CA Bar # 187580)

PO Box 697

Cedar Ridge, CA 95924

Tel: (530) 273-9290 

Fax: (530) 273-9260

rachelmfazio@gmail.com

Sean Malone (OR Bar # 084060) (Pro Hac Vice)

259 E.5th Ave, Ste200-G 

Eugene, OR 97401

Tel: (303) 859-0403

Fax: (650) 471-7366

seanmalone8@hotmail.com

Elisabeth Holmes (OR Bar # 120254) (Pro Hac Vice)

Blue River Law, P.C.

P.O. Box 293 

Eugene, OR 97440

Tel. (541) 870-7722

eli.blueriverlaw@gmail.com

Attorneys for Plaintiff

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CONSERVATION CONGRESS, a nonprofit organization,

Plaintiff,

vs.

UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, 

UNITED STATES

FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: 13-cv-01922-TLN-CMK

STIPULATION & ORDER TO 

CONTINUE CASE DEADLINES BY 90 

DAYS

Case 2:13-cv-01922-TLN-DMC Document 35 Filed 07/07/15 Page 1 of 3
STIPULATION & ORDER FOR 90 DAY CONTINUANCE - 2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

This is an Administrative Procedure Act case challenging the Forest Service’s approval of 

the Bagley Hazard Tree Abatement Project. On January 28, 2015 the Court approved the parties’ 

proposed briefing schedule. (See ECF No. 28). The Defendants filed the Administrative Record 

on June 8, 2015. (See ECF No. 31). Since June 8, 2015, the parties scheduled a July 30, 2015, 

meeting to explore settlement opportunities. 

The parties respectfully request that this Court continue all dates in this matter by 

approximately ninety (90) days so as to allow the parties the opportunity to focus on resolution rather 

than litigating. Therefore, the parties stipulate to, and propose the following briefing schedule:

Event Current Date Proposed Date

Objections to Administrative Record June 22, 2015 September 28, 2015

Plaintiff’s Motion June 29, 2015 October 5, 2015

Defendants’ Opposition and 

Cross-motion 

July 31, 2015 November 4, 2015

Plaintiff’s Combined Opposition and 

Reply 

August 14, 2015 November 18, 2015

Defendants’ Reply August 31, 2015 December 2, 2015

Respectfully submitted,

June 24, 2015 /s/ Rachel Fazio

RACHEL FAZIO

Attorney for Plaintiff

/s/ Sean T. Malone

SEAN T. MALONE

Attorney for Plaintiff

/s/ Elisabeth A. Holmes

ELISABETH A. HOLMES

Attorney for Plaintiff

DATED: June 24, 2015 BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

By: /s/ Gregory T. Broderick

GREGORY T. BRODERICK

Assistant United States Attorney

Case 2:13-cv-01922-TLN-DMC Document 35 Filed 07/07/15 Page 2 of 3
STIPULATION & ORDER FOR 90 DAY CONTINUANCE - 3

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

Good cause appearing, IT IS SO ORDERED

Dated: July 6, 2015

Case 2:13-cv-01922-TLN-DMC Document 35 Filed 07/07/15 Page 3 of 3