Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-10-06323/USCOURTS-ca4-10-06323-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Reginald Mimms
Appellant
United States of America
Appellee

Document Text:

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-6323

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

REGINALD MIMMS, a/k/a Gerald King,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, Senior 

District Judge. (7:99-cr-00048-jct; 7:00-cr-00022-jct)

Submitted: July 19, 2010 Decided: August 5, 2010

Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Reginald Mimms, Appellant Pro Se. Joseph W. H. Mott, OFFICE OF 

THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 10-6323 Doc: 7 Filed: 08/05/2010 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Reginald Mimms seeks to appeal the district court's 

order denying his motion for a writ of audita querela, pursuant 

to the All Writs Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1651(a) (2006). We have 

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, 

we affirm the district court’s order.*

AFFIRMED

See United States v. 

Mimms, Nos. 7:99-cr-00048-jct; 7:00-cr-00022-jct (W.D. Va.

Mar. 17, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the 

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before the court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

 * Although the court previously affirmed the district 

court’s order in United States v. Mimms, 333 F. App’x 793 (4th 

Cir. Oct. 19, 2009) (No. 09-6633) (unpublished), this court’s 

opinion and order failed to refer to one of the underlying 

criminal matters in which the district court’s order was filed. 

Accordingly, this per curiam opinion refers to both underlying 

criminal matters.

Appeal: 10-6323 Doc: 7 Filed: 08/05/2010 Pg: 2 of 2