Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-01153/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-01153-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Darrell Adams
Respondent
Clarence Ramirez
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CLARENCE RAMIREZ, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

v. )

)

DARRELL ADAMS, )

)

Respondent. )

 )

1:06-cv-01153-OWW-SMS-HC

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS (Doc. 5)

ORDER DISMISSING PETITION

FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO

ENTER JUDGMENT

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a

Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. 

On October 11, 2006, the Magistrate Judge filed Findings and

Recommendations that the petition for writ of habeas corpus be

DISMISSED as it does not allege grounds that would entitle

Petitioner to habeas corpus relief. These Findings and

Recommendations were served on all parties and contained notice

that any objections were to be filed within thirty (30) days from

the date of service of that order. To date, the parties have not

filed objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and

Recommendations.

//

Case 1:06-cv-01153-OWW -SMS Document 6 Filed 12/04/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636

(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a de novo review of the case. 

Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court concludes that

the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations are supported

by the record and proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed October 11, 2006,

are ADOPTED IN FULL;

2. The petition for writ of habeas corpus is DISMISSED as it

does not allege grounds that would entitle Petitioner to habeas

corpus relief; and,

3. The Clerk of Court enter judgment.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: December 3, 2006 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger 

emm0d6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-01153-OWW -SMS Document 6 Filed 12/04/06 Page 2 of 2