Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-15-01300/USCOURTS-ca4-15-01300-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Carolyn E. Reed-Smith
Appellant
Spartanburg County School District Seven
Appellee

Document Text:

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-1300

CAROLYN E. REED-SMITH, 

 Plaintiff - Appellant, 

v. 

SPARTANBURG COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT SEVEN, 

 Defendant - Appellee. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Spartanburg. J. Michelle Childs, District 

Judge. (7:11-cv-00970-JMC) 

Submitted: May 19, 2015 Decided: May 21, 2015

Before NIEMEYER and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior 

Circuit Judge. 

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Carolyn E. Reed-Smith, Appellant Pro Se. Carlos C. Johnson, 

Kenneth William Nettles, Jr., LYLES DARR & CLARK, LLP, 

Spartanburg, South Carolina, for Appellee. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 

Appeal: 15-1300 Doc: 17 Filed: 05/21/2015 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM: 

Carolyn E. Reed-Smith appeals the district court’s order 

denying her Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion. On appeal, we confine 

our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. 

See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Reed-Smith’s informal brief does 

not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, 

Reed-Smith has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. 

Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. 

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

AFFIRMED

Appeal: 15-1300 Doc: 17 Filed: 05/21/2015 Pg: 2 of 2