Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_14-cv-01005/USCOURTS-caed-1_14-cv-01005-5/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Commissioner of Social Security
Defendant
Richard P. Flores
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RICHARD P. FLORES,

Plaintiff,

v.

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,

Defendant.

Case No. 1:14-cv-1005 DAD-BAM

ORDER DIRECTING DEFENDANT TO 

FILE A RESPONSE BRIEF 

RESPONSE BRIEF DUE May 9, 2016

ORDER DISCHARGING ORDER TO 

SHOW CAUSE 

The Court previously ordered pro se Plaintiff Richard Flores to show cause why his case 

should not be dismissed for his failure to file an opening brief. (Doc. 23). In response to the 

order to show cause, Plaintiff filed a declaration with the Court stating that he is seeking 

retroactive disability benefits based on a disability beginning in October 2009. (Doc. 24). 

Plaintiff also directs the Court to the “additional medical records” filed on April 21, 2015 in 

support of his appeal. (Doc. 9). The Court concludes that Plaintiff has filed all the briefing he 

intends to file in support of his appeal, and that Defendant’s response to the briefing is now due. 

Accordingly, within 30 days from the date of this order, Defendant is ORDERED to 

file a response to Plaintiff’s briefing. 

Having considered Plaintiff’s response, the Court’s Order to Show Cause (Doc. 23), is 

HEREBY DISCHARGED. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 8, 2016 /s/ Barbara A. McAuliffe _

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:14-cv-01005-DAD-BAM Document 25 Filed 04/08/16 Page 1 of 1