Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-01503/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-01503-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Commissioner of Social Security
Defendant
William Skelton
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

WILLIAM SKELTON, )

 )

Plaintiff, )

)

v. )

)

MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner )

of Social Security, )

)

Defendant. )

)

____________________________________)

CIV F 06-1503 AWI GSA

ORDER ON MAGISTRATE

JUDGE’S FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

(Doc. Nos. 23, 28, & 35)

Plaintiff is represented by counsel and seeks judicial review of a final decision of the

Commissioner of Social Security (Commissioner) denying certain disability benefits. The matter

was referred to the Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Local Rule 72-302.

On April 1, 2008, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and a recommendation that the

Plaintiff’s social security complaint be denied and that the Clerk be directed to enter judgment

for Defendant Michael J. Astrue and against Plaintiff William Skelton. The findings and

recommendations were served on all parties on April 1, 2008, and contained notice that any

objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fifteen (15) days of the

date of service of the order. Fifteen days have passed, and as of the date of this order, no party

has filed any objections.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a

de novo review. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds that the findings and

Case 1:06-cv-01503-AWI-GSA Document 36 Filed 04/23/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

recommendations are supported by the record and proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendation filed on April 1, 2008, are ADOPTED IN FULL;

2. The Plaintiff’s social security complaint is DENIED; and

3. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to enter judgment for Defendant Michael J. Astrue 

and against Plaintiff William Skelton. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 22, 2008 /s/ Anthony W. Ishii 

0m8i78 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-01503-AWI-GSA Document 36 Filed 04/23/08 Page 2 of 2