Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_16-cv-00860/USCOURTS-caed-2_16-cv-00860-2/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Commissioner of Social Security
Defendant
Michelle A. Martin
Plaintiff

Document Text:

[Proposed] Order to Extend Briefing Schedule; 2:16-cv-00860-CMK

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

PHILLIP A. TALBERT

United States Attorney

DEBORAH LEE STACHEL, CSBN 230138

Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX

Social Security Administration

C. HAY-MIE CHO, CSBN 282259

Special Assistant United States Attorney

160 Spear Street, Suite 800

San Francisco, California 94105

Telephone: (415) 268-5610

Facsimile: (415) 744-0134

E-Mail: haymie.cho@ssa.gov

Attorneys for Defendant

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SACRAMENTO DIVISION

MICHELLE A. MARTIN,

Plaintiff,

vs.

NANCY A. BERRYHILL,

1

Acting Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: 2:16-cv-00860-CMK

ORDER 

Having reviewed the Stipulation of the parties and finding good cause, the Court hereby 

APPROVES and ADOPTS the parties’ Joint Stipulation to Extend Briefing Schedule as the 

Order of this Court. The Court hereby EXTENDS the schedule in this matter as follows:

 

1 Nancy A. Berryhill is now the Acting Commissioner of Social Security. Pursuant to Rule 

25(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Nancy A. Berryhill should be substituted for 

Acting Commissioner Carolyn W. Colvin as the defendant in this suit. No further action needs 

to be taken to continue this suit by reason of the last sentence of section 205(g) of the Social 

Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).

Case 2:16-cv-00860-MCE-CMK Document 23 Filed 01/31/17 Page 1 of 2
[Proposed] Order to Extend Briefing Schedule; 2:16-cv-00860-CMK

2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1. The deadline for Defendant to file her response to Plaintiff’s motion for summary 

judgment is extended fifteen (15) days to February 13, 2017.

2. The deadline for Plaintiff to file her reply to Defendant’s response is extended 

forty-five (45) days to April 18, 2017.

3. All other deadlines and scheduling matters set forth in the Court’s Scheduling 

Order dated June 2, 2016, remain the same.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 30, 2017

Case 2:16-cv-00860-MCE-CMK Document 23 Filed 01/31/17 Page 2 of 2