Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_18-cv-02015/USCOURTS-caed-2_18-cv-02015-3/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
J. Gastelo
Respondent
Wesley Panighetti
Petitioner

Document Text:

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

WESLEY PANIGHETTI, 

Petitioner, 

v. 

J. GASTELO, 

Respondent. 

No. 2:18-cv-2015 KJM AC P 

ORDER 

 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this application for a writ of habeas 

corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as 

provided by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 

 On September 25, 2019, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which 

were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the 

findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. ECF No. 28. Petitioner has 

filed objections to the findings and recommendations. ECF No. 29. 

 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this 

court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having reviewed the file, the court finds the 

findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the proper analysis. 

///// 

///// 

Case 2:18-cv-02015-KJM-AC Document 30 Filed 02/18/20 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2 

 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 

 1. The findings and recommendations filed September 25, 2019 (ECF No. 28), are 

adopted in full; 

 2. Respondent’s motion to dismiss (ECF No. 17) is granted on the grounds that the 

petition is untimely and Grounds One through Four are further barred by Lackawanna County 

District Attorney v. Coss, 532 U.S. 394 (2001); 

3. Petitioner’s application for a writ of habeas corpus is denied; 

 4. The court declines to issue the certificate of appealability referenced in 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2253; and 

 5. The clerk of court close this file. 

DATED: February 18, 2020. 

Case 2:18-cv-02015-KJM-AC Document 30 Filed 02/18/20 Page 2 of 2