Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca5-15-50580/USCOURTS-ca5-15-50580-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Shery Rene Ledford
Appellant
United States of America
Appellee

Document Text:

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-50580

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

SHERY RENE LEDFORD,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 7:15-CR-15-2

Before REAVLEY, ELROD, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Shery Rene Ledford has moved for 

leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 

386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011).

Ledford has filed a response. The record is not sufficiently developed to allow

us to make a fair evaluation of Ledford’s claims of ineffective assistance of 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

April 20, 2016

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 15-50580 Document: 00513473085 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/20/2016
No. 15-50580

2

counsel; we therefore decline to consider the claims without prejudice to 

collateral review. See United States v. Isgar, 739 F.3d 829, 841 (5th Cir. 2014).

We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record 

reflected therein, as well as Ledford’s response. We concur with counsel’s 

assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. 

Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused 

from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See

5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 15-50580 Document: 00513473085 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/20/2016