Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_08-cv-02335/USCOURTS-cand-3_08-cv-02335-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
David Cooper
Petitioner
Anthony Hedgpeth
Defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Case No. C 08-2335 JF

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE 

(JFLC2)

**E-Filed 7/10/08**

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

DAVID COOPER,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ANTHONY HEDGPETH, Warden,

 Respondent.

Case Number C 08-2335 JF

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE 

Petitioner, a state prisoner currently incarcerated at the Kern Valley State Prison, Delano,

California, has filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner

is represented by counsel. Venue is proper because Petitioner was convicted and sentenced in the

San Francisco Superior Court, which is located within the Northern District of California. See 28

U.S.C. § 2241(d) (providing that venue is proper in either the district in which the petitioner was

convicted and sentenced or the district in which the petitioner is incarcerated).

IT IS ORDERED as follows:

(1) The Clerk of the Court shall serve by certified mail a copy of the petition and a

copy of this Order upon counsel for Respondent, the Attorney General of the State of California. 

The Clerk of the Court also shall serve a copy of this Order upon counsel for Petitioner, David

Case 3:08-cv-02335-RS Document 2 Filed 07/10/08 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Case No. C 08-2335 JF

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE 

(JFLC2)

McNeil Morse.

(2) Respondent shall, within thirty (60) days after receiving this order, file and serve

upon Petitioner’s counsel an answer conforming in all respects to Rule 5 of the Rules Governing

Section 2254 Cases, showing cause why a writ of habeas corpus should not issue. At the time

the answer is filed, Respondent shall lodge with the Court all records relevant to a determination

of the issues presented by the petition. If Respondent contends that Petitioner has failed to

exhaust state remedies as to any ground for relief asserted in the petition, Respondent shall

specify what state remedy remains available to Petitioner. If Respondent waives or concedes the

issue of exhaustion, Respondent shall so state in the answer. 

(3) Petitioner may file a traverse responding to matters raised in the answer within

thirty (30) days after receiving the answer. 

(4) Unless otherwise ordered by the Court, the matter will be deemed submitted upon

the filing of the traverse or upon the expiration of time to file a traverse.

DATED: 7/10/08

__________________________________

JEREMY FOGEL

United States District Judge

Case 3:08-cv-02335-RS Document 2 Filed 07/10/08 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3

Case No. C 08-2335 JF

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE 

(JFLC2)

Copies of Order served on: 

Counsel for Petitioner:

David McNeil Morse morsefam@aol.com

Counsel for Respondent:

Office of the Attorney General of the State of California

455 Golden Gate Avenue

Suite 11000

San Francisco, CA 94102-3664

Case 3:08-cv-02335-RS Document 2 Filed 07/10/08 Page 3 of 3