Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-03729/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-03729-8/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Kevin Janda
Plaintiff
Manjit Singh
Plaintiff
T-Mobile USA, Inc.
Defendant

Document Text:

1

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE HEARING AND SUBSEQUENT CMC SFO 290385v1 48172-212

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

D

A

VIS

W

RIG

H

T

T

R

E

M

AIN

E

L

L

P

JOSEPH E. ADDIEGO III (CA State Bar No. 169522)

DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP

One Embarcadero Center, Suite 600

San Francisco, California 94111

Telephone: (415) 276-6500

Facsimile: (415) 276-6599

Email: joeaddiego@dwt.com

STEPHEN M. RUMMAGE (pro hac vice)

BRADLEY L. FISHER

DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP

2600 Century Square

1501 Fourth Avenue

Seattle, Washington 98101-1688

Telephone: (206) 622-3150

Facsimile: (206) 628-7699

Email: steverummage@dwt.com

bradfisher@dwt.com

Attorneys for Defendant

T-MOBILE USA, INC.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

KEVIN JANDA and MANJIT SINGH, on behalf 

of themselves and all others similarly situated 

and as private attorneys general on behalf of the 

members of the general public residing within 

the State of California,

Plaintiffs,

v.

T-MOBILE USA, INC., a foreign corporation,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

) 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. C 05-03729 JSW

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER TO CONTINUE HEARING ON 

T-MOBILE S MOTION TO STAY AND

SUBSEQUENT CASE MANAGEMENT 

CONFERENCE

Judge: Hon. Jeffrey S. White

STIPULATION

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-7 and The Hon. Jeffrey S. White s Standing Civil Order No. 3, the parties, through their undersigned counsel of record, hereby stipulate and agree as follows, 

and jointly request that the Court enter the below order continuing the hearing on Defendant T- Mobile USA, Inc. s ( T-Mobile ) Motion to Stay and the Further Case Management Conference to

June 23, 2006 at 9:00 a.m., as set forth in this Stipulation:

Case 3:05-cv-03729-JSW Document 58 Filed 05/02/2006 Page 1 of 2
 Case 3:05-cv-03729-JSW Document 59 Filed 05/02/06 Page 1 of 2
2

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE HEARING AND SUBSEQUENT CMC SFO 290385v1 48172-212

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

D

A

VIS

W

RIG

H

T

T

R

E

M

AIN

E

L

L

P

1. On April 21, 2006, T-Mobile filed a Motion to Stay the instant action pending 

resolution of T-Mobile s interlocutory appeal of this Court s Order Denying T-Mobile, USA, Inc. s

Motion to Dismiss and Compel Arbitration and Denying as Moot Plaintiffs Motion to Strike. 2. T-Mobile noticed its Motion to Stay for May 26, 2006. 3. On April 24, 2006, the Court issued a Clerk s Notice continuing the hearing on T- Mobile s Motion to Stay to June 2, 2006 at 9:00 a.m., and further continuing to that same date and

time the Further Case Management Conference, which was previously scheduled for May 26, 2006 

at 2:00 p.m.

4. T-Mobile s counsel, Stephen M. Rummage, is not available to attend the hearings

on June 2, because he already is scheduled to appear at oral argument in the Washington Court of 

Appeals in Seattle, Washington that morning. 5. The parties, through their respective counsel, have met and conferred and 

determined that June 23, 2006, is the first open hearing date on which all counsel are available to 

appear on the Motion to Stay and Further Case Management Conference.

4. As such, the parties jointly stipulate and request that the Motion to Stay and the 

Further Case Management Conference be continued to June 23, 2006 at 9:00 a.m.

Dated: May 2, 2006

DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP

Attorneys for Defendant T-Mobile USA, Inc.

By /s/ Joseph E. Addiego III .

 Joseph E. Addiego III 

 CA State Bar No. 169522

 Stephen M. Rummage, pro hac vice

 Dated: May 2, 2006

SHORT CRESSMAN & BURGESS

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

By /s/ Alex Rose .

 David Breskin, pro hac vice

 Alex Rose, pro hac vice

ORDER

Having considered the foregoing Stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED this ____ day of May, 2006.The Honorable Jeffrey S. White

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:05-cv-03729-JSW Document 58 Filed 05/02/2006 Page 2 of 2

2

Case 3:05-cv-03729-JSW Document 59 Filed 05/02/06 Page 2 of 2