Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-02732/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-02732-22/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Panoptx, Inc.
Counter-claimant
Protective Optics, Inc.
Counter-defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND PARTIES’ DEADLINES TO FILE BRIEFS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

MOTION AND SANCTIONS MOTION; CASE NO. C05-02732 CRB

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

PROTECTIVE OPTICS, INC.,

a California corporation

Plaintiff,

v.

PANOPTX INC.,

a California corporation

Defendant.

Case No. C05-02732 CRB

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

TO EXTEND PARTIES’ DEADLINES TO

FILE BRIEFS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

MOTION AND SANCTIONS MOTION

Courtroom: 8, 19th Floor

Before: Hon. Charles R. Breyer

[Trial Date: August 6, 2007]

AND RELATED CROSS-ACTION

E. Patrick Ellisen, CA Bar No. 142033

ellisenp@gtlaw.com

Daniel T. McCloskey, CA Bar No. 191944

mccloskeyd@gtlaw.com

GREENBERG TRAURIG LLP

1900 University Avenue 5th Floor

East Palo Alto, CA 94303

Telephone: (650) 328-8500

Facsimile: (650) 328-8508

Brian A. Carpenter, pro hac vice

carpenterb@gtlaw.com

GREENBERG TRAURIG LLP

1200 17th Street, Suite 2400

Denver, CO 80202

Telephone: (303) 572-6500

Facsimile: (303) 572-6540

Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterclaim-Defendant,

PROTECTIVE OPTICS, INC.

Case 3:05-cv-02732-CRB Document 187 Filed 06/04/07 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND PARTIES’ DEADLINES TO FILE BRIEFS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

MOTION AND SANCTIONS MOTION;

CASE NO. C05-02732 CRB

Plaintiff and Counterclaim-Defendant Protective Optics, Inc. and Defendant and

Counterclaimant Panoptx, Inc. (collectively, the “Parties”), by and through their undersigned

attorneys, state and agree as follows:

Whereas, Protective’s Reply brief in support of its Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on

Panoptx’s Seventh Affirmative Defense for Patent Invalidity Under 35 U.S.C. §112 [Docket No. 163]

(“Summary Judgment Motion”), set for hearing on June 15, 2007, is currently due to be filed not later

than June 1, 2007;

Whereas, Panoptx’s Opposition to Protective’s Motion for Sanctions Against Panoptx for

Violations of this Court’s February 6 and March 30 Orders Compelling Discovery [Docket No. 168]

(“Sanctions Motion”), set for hearing on June 22, 2007, is currently due to be filed not later than June

1, 2007;

Whereas, at the Parties’ request, a settlement conference has been scheduled in this matter

before Judge Chen for June 1, 2007, the same date that the Reply and Oppositions to the Summary

Judgment and Sanctions Motions are due, and is expected to last most of the day;

Whereas, given the need of the Parties and their counsel to fully participate in the settlement

conference, the Parties agree that the due date for Protective’s Reply in support of its Summary

Judgment Motion and for Panoptx’s Opposition to the Sanctions Motion should be extended to June

5, 2007, and that Protective’s Reply brief in support of its Sanctions Motion should be extended to

June 12, 2007;

NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the Parties, subject to

Court approval, as follows, that:

1. the due date for Protective’s Reply in support of its Summary Judgment

Motion and for Panoptx’s Opposition to the Sanctions Motion should be

extended to June 5, 2007, and that Protective’s Reply brief in support of its

Sanctions Motion should be extended to June 12, 2007.

Case 3:05-cv-02732-CRB Document 187 Filed 06/04/07 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND PARTIES’ DEADLINES TO FILE BRIEFS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

MOTION AND SANCTIONS MOTION;

CASE NO. C05-02732 CRB

DATED: May 31, 2007 GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP

By: /s/ Daniel T. McCloskey

Daniel T. McCloskey

Attorneys for Plaintiff and CounterclaimDefendant,

PROTECTIVE OPTICS, INC.

DATED: May 31, 2007 KRIEG, KELLER, SLOAN, REILLEY & ROMAN, LLP

By: /s/

Michael D. Lisi

Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant,

PANOPTX, INC.

I, Daniel T. McCloskey, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file this

Stipulation and [Proposed] Order to Stipulation And [Proposed] Order To Extend Parties’ Deadlines

To File Briefs For Summary Judgment Motion And Sanctions Motion. In compliance with General

Order 45, X.B., I hereby attest that Michael D. Lisi has concurred in this filing.

Dated: May 31, 2007 By: /s/ Daniel T. McCloskey

Daniel T. McCloskey

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated:

HON. CHARLES R. BREYER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

June 1, 2007

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Charles R. Breyer

Case 3:05-cv-02732-CRB Document 187 Filed 06/04/07 Page 3 of 3