Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-00905/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-00905-3/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Jeff Macomber
Respondent
Chanreasmey Prum
Petitioner

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CHANREASMEY PRUM,

Petitioner,

v.

JEFF MACOMBER,

Respondent.

No. 2:15-cv-0905 TLN CKD P

ORDER

On August 18, 2016, petitioner filed a request for reconsideration of the August 9, 2016

judgment denying the petition for writ of habeas corpus and declining to order a certificate of 

appealability. 

A district court may reconsider a ruling under either Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e) 

or 60(b). See Sch. Dist. Number. 1J, Multnomah County v. ACandS, Inc., 5 F.3d 1255, 1262 (9th 

Cir. 1993). “Reconsideration is appropriate if the district court (1) is presented with newly 

discovered evidence, (2) committed clear error or the initial decision was manifestly unjust, or (3) 

if there is an intervening change in controlling law.” Id. at 1263. Here, the Court’s decision was 

not clearly erroneous nor manifestly unjust, and none of the other factors apply.

////

////

////

Case 2:15-cv-00905-TLN-CKD Document 30 Filed 01/05/17 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner’s motion for reconsideration 

(ECF No. 24) is denied.

Dated: January 4, 2017

Case 2:15-cv-00905-TLN-CKD Document 30 Filed 01/05/17 Page 2 of 2