Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_03-cv-06830/USCOURTS-caed-1_03-cv-06830-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Arthur Landeros
Petitioner
Soledad State Prison
Respondent

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ARTHUR LANDEROS, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

)

v. )

)

)

SOLEDAD STATE PRISON, )

)

Respondent. )

 )

1:03-cv-06830-REC-TAG HC

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

(Doc. 17)

ORDER DISMISSING THIRD AMENDED

PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

(Doc. 12)

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO

ENTER JUDGMENT

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. 

On January 4, 2005, the Magistrate Judge assigned to the case filed a Report and

Recommendations recommending that the third amended petition for writ of habeas corpus be

DISMISSED for failure to file the original Petition within the one-year time period provided for in

28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(1), for lack of jurisdiction, and for failure to exhaust state court remedies. (Doc.

17). The Report and Recommendations were served on all parties and contained notice that any

objections were to be filed within thirty days from the date of service of that order. On January 28,

2005, Petitioner timely filed objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendations. 

(Doc. 18). 

Case 1:03-cv-06830-REC-TAG Document 22 Filed 12/16/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a de

novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, including Petitioner's objections,

the Court concludes that the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendations are supported by the

record and proper analysis. Petitioner's objections present no grounds for questioning the Magistrate

Judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Report and Recommendations issued January 4, 2005 (Doc. 17), are ADOPTED IN

FULL; 

2. The third amended petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. 12), is DISMISSED; and

3. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to ENTER JUDGMENT for Respondent.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: December 16, 2005 /s/ Robert E. Coyle 

668554 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:03-cv-06830-REC-TAG Document 22 Filed 12/16/05 Page 2 of 2