Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_12-cv-02502/USCOURTS-caed-2_12-cv-02502-15/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Bank of America Corporation
Defendant
Bank of America, N.A.
Defendant
Antonio Esquivel
Plaintiff
Beatriz Esquivel
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATION AND ORDER 

ALLOWING PLAINTIFFS TO AMEND COMPLAINT CASE NO. 2:12-CV-02502-KJM-KJN 

STEVEN A. ELLIS (SBN 171742)

sellis@goodwinprocter.com

GOODWIN PROCTER LLP

601 S. Figueroa Street, 41st Floor 

Los Angeles, CA 90017 

Tel.: 213.426.2500 

Fax: 213.623.1673 

Attorney for Defendants: 

BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.; 

BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION 

DANIEL J. MULLIGAN (SBN 103129) 

dan@jmglawoffices.com 

JENKINS MULLIGAN & GABRIEL LLP 

78-065 Main Street, Suite 202 

La Quinta, CA 92253 

Tel.: 415.982.8500 

Fax: 415.982.8515 

Attorney for Plaintiffs: 

ANTONIO AND BEATRIZ ESQUIVEL 

[ADDITIONAL COUNSEL LISTED ON 

SIGNATURE PAGE] 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SACRAMENTO DIVISION 

ANTONIO ESQUIVEL and BEATRIZ 

ESQUIVEL, 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.; BANK OF 

AMERICA CORPORATION 

Defendants. 

Case No. 2:12-cv-02502-KJM-KJN

STIPULATION AND ORDER ALLOWING 

PLAINTIFFS TO AMEND COMPLAINT 

Judge: Hon. Kimberly J. Mueller 

Dept.: Courtroom 3, 15th Floor 

 

Case 2:12-cv-02502-KJM-KJN Document 100 Filed 04/05/16 Page 1 of 5
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2

STIPULATION AND ORDER 

ALLOWING PLAINTIFFS TO AMEND COMPLAINT CASE NO. 2:12-CV-02502-KJM-KJN

Plaintiffs ANTONIO AND BEATRIZ ESQUIVEL (“Plaintiffs”) and Defendants Bank of 

America, N.A. and Bank of America Corporation (together, “Bank of America” or “Defendants”) 

(collectively referred to as the “Parties”) jointly submit this Stipulation Allowing Plaintiffs to 

Amend Complaint. 

WHEREAS, on October 5, 2012, Plaintiffs filed their initial putative class action complaint 

alleging claims for breach of contract, promissory estoppel, and violations of the California 

Consumer Credit Reporting Agencies Act (“CCRAA”), the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act 

(“FDCPA”), the Rosenthal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“Rosenthal Act”), and California 

Business and Professions Code § 17200 (“UCL”) (Dkt. No. 1); 

WHEREAS, on June 14, 2013, the Court issued an order deeming the complaint amended 

to allege diversity jurisdiction (Dkt. No. 40); 

WHEREAS, the Court dismissed with prejudice Plaintiffs’ FDCPA claim, promissory 

estoppel claim, and CCRAA claim to the extent it is based upon violation of any section of the 

CCRAA other than California Civil Code section 1785.25(a) (Dkt. Nos. 32, 48); 

WHEREAS, on January 7, 2016, the Court denied Plaintiffs’ motion for class certification 

(Dkt. 93); 

WHEREAS, on March 3, 2016, the Parties participated in a status conference before the 

Court (Dkt. No. 97); 

WHEREAS, on March 14, 2016, in connection with the status conference held on March 

3, 2016, the Court issued a status order directing the Parties to meet and confer regarding the filing 

of an amended complaint and file a joint stipulation, if possible, within twenty-one (21) days of 

the status conference (Dkt. No. 98); 

WHEREAS, the Parties met and conferred and hereby stipulate to Plaintiffs’ filing the 

attached Second Amended Complaint on behalf of themselves as individuals (Exhibit A hereto). 

WHEREAS, Defendants do not waive, and expressly reserve, any rights they have with 

respect to the Second Amended Complaint, including their right to assert defenses to the claims in 

the Second Amended Complaint. 

Case 2:12-cv-02502-KJM-KJN Document 100 Filed 04/05/16 Page 2 of 5
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

3

STIPULATION AND ORDER 

ALLOWING PLAINTIFFS TO AMEND COMPLAINT CASE NO. 2:12-CV-02502-KJM-KJN

NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties, through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate and 

jointly request that the Court allow Plaintiffs to file the attached Second Amended Complaint. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

 

Case 2:12-cv-02502-KJM-KJN Document 100 Filed 04/05/16 Page 3 of 5
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

4

STIPULATION AND ORDER 

ALLOWING PLAINTIFFS TO AMEND COMPLAINT CASE NO. 2:12-CV-02502-KJM-KJN

 Respectfully submitted, 

 

Dated: April 5, 2016 By: /s/ Alyssa A. Sussman 

ALYSSA A. SUSSMAN (pro hac vice) 

asussman@goodwinprocter.com 

GOODWIN PROCTER LLP

620 Eighth Avenue 

New York, NY 10018 

Tel.: 212.813.8800 

Fax: 212.355.3333 

JAMES W. MCGARRY (pro hac vice) 

jmcgarry@goodwinprocter.com 

GOODWIN PROCTER LLP

53 State Street 

Boston, MA 02109 

Tel.: 617.570.1000 

Fax: 617.523.1231 

STEVEN A. ELLIS 

sellis@goodwinprocter.com

GOODWIN PROCTER LLP

Attorneys for Defendants: 

BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. 

 BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION 

Dated: April 5, 2016By: /s/ Noah Zinner (as authorized on 3/24/16) 

DANIEL J. MULLIGAN (SBN 103129) 

dan@jmglawoffices.com 

JENKINS MULLIGAN & GABRIEL LLP

NOAH ZINNER (SBN 247581) 

nzinner@heraca.org 

HOUSING AND ECONOMIC RIGHTS 

ADVOCATES 

1814 Franklin Street, Suite 1040 

Oakland, CA 94612 

Tel.: 510.271.8443 

Fax: 510.280.2548 

ERIC A. MERCER (SBN 248707) 

mercerlegal@me.com 

LAW OFFICE OF ERIC ANDREW 

MERCER 

770 L Street, Suite 950 

Sacramento, CA 95814 

Tel.: 916.361.6022 

Fax: 916.361.6023 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs; 

 ANTONIO AND BEATRIZ ESQUIVEL 

Case 2:12-cv-02502-KJM-KJN Document 100 Filed 04/05/16 Page 4 of 5
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

5

STIPULATION AND ORDER 

ALLOWING PLAINTIFFS TO AMEND COMPLAINT CASE NO. 2:12-CV-02502-KJM-KJN

 

ORDER 

 Upon consideration of the Parties’ Stipulation Allowing Plaintiffs to Amend Complaint 

(“Stipulation”), 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Stipulation is GRANTED. The Second Amended 

Complaint attached to the Stipulation as Exhibit A is deemed filed as of the date of this order. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: April 5, 2016 

Case 2:12-cv-02502-KJM-KJN Document 100 Filed 04/05/16 Page 5 of 5