Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cr-00703/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cr-00703-5/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Patrick Arnold
Defendant
USA
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

KEVIN V. RYAN (CSBN #118321)

United States Attorney

EUMI L. CHOI (WVSBN #0722)

Chief, Criminal Division

MATTHEW A. PARRELLA (NYSBN #2040855)

JEFFREY D. NEDROW (CSBN #161299)

JEFFREY R. FINIGAN (CSBN #168285)

Assistant United States Attorneys

150 Almaden Blvd., Suite 900

San Jose, CA 95113

Telephone: (408) 535-5045

Facsimile: (408) 535-5066

Email: jeff.nedrow@usdoj.gov

Attorneys For Plaintiffs

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

 

 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) CR No.: 05-00703 SI

)

Plaintiff, ) STIPULATION AND PROPOSED

 ) ORDER RE: SPEEDY TRIAL 

 ) EXCLUSION

v. ) 

 )

PATRICK ARNOLD, ) 

) 

Defendant. ) 

__________________________________________) 

The United States of America, by and through Kevin V. Ryan, United States Attorney

for the Northern District of California, Jeffrey D. Nedrow, Assistant United States Attorney,

and Jeffrey R. Finigan, Assistant United States Attorney, and defendant Patrick Arnold, and his

attorney, Nanci Clarence, Esq., hereby stipulate to the following: 

At the January 27, 2006 status conference in this case, the parties discussed the progress

made in resolving discovery issues in this case. The government produced a box of documents

on December 6, 2005 which contained what the government regarded as the core discovery

material in this case. In addition, on January 27, 2006, the government produced several more

boxes of documents which included all of the items seized pursuant to the search warrants

Case 3:05-cr-00703-SI Document 21 Filed 02/28/2006 Page 1 of 2
 Case 3:05-cr-00703-SI Document 23 Filed 03/02/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

executed at defendant’s residence and business premises. The parties jointly agreed to a

continuance of approximately six weeks to permit the defense time needed to review the newly

provided search warrant material and make an informed decision regarding pretrial motions

and/or a possible pretrial disposition in this case. Based upon this joint request, the Court set 

the matter for March 10, 2006 at 11:00 a.m for a further trial setting conference. 

GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, it is hereby ordered that this case is continued from 

January 27, 2006 to March 10, 2006 at 11:00 a.m. The Court finds the time from January 27,

2006 to March 10, 2006 excludable under the Speedy Trial Act pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§

3161(h)(8)(A) and (h)(8)(B)(iv). The Court finds the time excludable in that the ends of justice

served by granting this continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendants

in an earlier trial date specifically to provide counsel with adequate time to review the recently

provided items seized in the search warrant and make an informed decision as to possible

pretrial motions and a possible pretrial disposition. A continuance is therefore necessary to

ensure the ability of counsel to prepare appropriately to make these decisions, and denial of

such a continuance would unreasonably deny counsel time for such effective preparation

pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161(h)(8)(A) and 3161(h)(8)(B)(iv).

SO STIPULATED.

DATED: February 22, 2006 _____________/s/_____________

NANCI L. CLARENCE

Attorney for Patrick Arnold

DATED: February 22, 2006 _____________/s/______________

JEFFREY D. NEDROW

JEFFREY R. FINIGAN

Assistant United States Attorneys

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

 

DATED: _______________________ 

SUSAN ILLSTON

United States District Judge

Case 3:05-cr-00703-SI Document 21 Filed 02/28/2006 Page 2 of 2
 Case 3:05-cr-00703-SI Document 23 Filed 03/02/06 Page 2 of 2