Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-19-07638/USCOURTS-ca4-19-07638-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Calvin F. Currica
Appellant
Richard Miller
Appellee

Document Text:

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-7638

CALVIN F. CURRICA,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

WARDEN RICHARD MILLER,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. 

Paula Xinis, District Judge. (8:16-cv-03259-PX)

Submitted: February 20, 2020 Decided: February 25, 2020

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, RUSHING, Circuit Judge, and TRAXLER, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Calvin F. Currica, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 19-7638 Doc: 9 Filed: 02/25/2020 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM: 

Calvin F. Currica seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing his 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2254 (2018) petition. Parties to a civil action are accorded 30 days after the entry of the 

district court’s final judgment or order to note an appeal. Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A). The 

district court may, however, extend the time to file a notice of appeal if the party moves 

for an extension of the appeal period within 30 days after the expiration of the original 

appeal period and demonstrates excusable neglect or good cause to warrant an extension. 

Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5). “[T]he timely filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a 

jurisdictional requirement.” Bowles v. Russell, 551 U.S. 205, 214 (2007).

The district court entered its order on September 13, 2019. Currica filed the notice 

of appeal on October 24, 2019, after the expiration of the 30-day appeal period but within 

the excusable neglect period. See Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266, 276 (1988) (establishing 

prison mailbox rule). Because Currica’s notice of appeal included a request for an 

extension of time in which to file an appeal, we construe it as a timely request for an 

extension of the appeal period pursuant to Rule 4(a)(5). Accordingly, we remand this case 

to the district court for further factual development on the limited question of whether 

Currica has shown excusable neglect or good cause warranting an extension of the appeal 

period. The record, as supplemented, will then be returned to this court for further 

consideration.

REMANDED

USCA4 Appeal: 19-7638 Doc: 9 Filed: 02/25/2020 Pg: 2 of 2