Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-00471/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-00471-2/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
California Correctional Institution
Defendant
Willie Weaver
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

WILLIE WEAVER, 

Plaintiff,

vs.

CALIFORNIA CORRECTIONAL

INSTITUTION CONFINEMENT SHU,

Defendant. 

 /

1:06-cv-00471-AWI-LJO-P

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS (Doc. 4)

ORDER DISMISSING ENTIRE ACTION

Willie Weaver (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding

pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 

The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72-302.

On June 8, 2006, the Magistrate Judge filed Findings and

Recommendations herein which were served on the parties and which

contained notice to the parties that any objections to the

Findings and Recommendations were to be filed within twenty (20)

days. On June 19, 2006, Plaintiff filed a motion to extend time.

On July 26, 2006, the Court granted Plaintiff an additional

twenty (20) days within which to respond. On August 11, 2006,

Case 1:06-cv-00471-AWI-LJO Document 8 Filed 10/04/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Plaintiff filed Objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Findings and

Recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C.

§ 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 73-305, this Court has conducted a

de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the

entire file, the Court finds the Findings and Recommendations to

be supported by the record and by proper analysis. Plaintiff’s

objections do not offer any reason why this action should not be

dismissed as duplicative of another action.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed June 8, 2006,

are ADOPTED IN FULL; and,

2. The instant case is DISMISSED in its entirety as

DUPLICATIVE of case no. CV-F-06-429-AWI-SMS-P, CV-F-06-441-OWWSMS-P, FAILS TO STATE A CLAIM upon which relief can be granted

and because the allegations made are FRIVOLOUS.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 3, 2006 /s/ Anthony W. Ishii 

0m8i78 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-00471-AWI-LJO Document 8 Filed 10/04/06 Page 2 of 2