Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_13-cv-02619/USCOURTS-caed-2_13-cv-02619-12/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Origen Biomedical, Inc.
Defendant
Thermogenesis Corp.
Plaintiff

Document Text:

- 1 –

Joint Stipulation To Voluntarily Dismiss Action With Prejudice Pursuant To Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) 

And District Court Continuing Jurisdiction Over Enforcement - Case No.: 2:13-cv-02619-MCE-DAD

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

THOMAS A. WOODS (SB #210050)

STOEL RIVES LLP

500 Capitol Mall, Suite 1600

Sacramento, CA 95814

Telephone: (916) 447-0700

Facsimile: (916) 447-4781

tawoods@stoel.com

Attorneys for Defendant

ORIGEN BIOMEDICAL, INC.

ANDREA M. MILLER (SB #88992)

NAGELEY, MEREDITH & MILLER, INC.

8801 Folsom Blvd., Suite 172

Sacramento, CA 95826

Telephone: (916) 386-8282

Facsimile: (916) 386-8952

amiller@nmlawfirm.com

Attorneys for Plaintiff

THERMOGENESIS GROUP

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

THERMOGENESIS CORP.,

 Plaintiff,

vs.

ORIGEN BIOMEDICAL, INC.,

 Defendant.

Case No.: 2:13-cv-02619-MCE-DAD

JOINT STIPULATION TO VOLUNTARILY 

DISMISS ACTION WITH PREJUDICE 

PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 

41(a)(1)(A)(ii) AND DISTRICT COURT

CONTINUING JURISDICTION OVER 

ENFORCEMENT; ORDER THEREON

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that: 

Plaintiff THERMOGENESIS CORP. (“Thermo”) and Defendant ORIGEN 

BIOMEDICAL, INC. (“OriGen”), collectively, “the Parties,” respectfully submit this Joint 

Stipulation to voluntarily dismiss this action with prejudice pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 

41(a)(1)(A)(ii). The Parties hereby stipulate and agree as follows:

Whereas, on December 17, 2013, Plaintiff filed this action in the United District 

Court for the Eastern District of California. 

Case 2:13-cv-02619-MCE-DAD Document 98 Filed 04/16/15 Page 1 of 3
- 2 –

Joint Stipulation To Voluntarily Dismiss Action With Prejudice Pursuant To Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) 

And District Court Continuing Jurisdiction Over Enforcement - Case No.: 2:13-cv-02619-MCE-DAD

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Whereas, the District Court shall retain limited, continuing jurisdiction over 

disputes relating to the enforcement of the provisions of the Parties’ Confidential 

Settlement and Release Agreement related to this action pursuant to Kokkonen v. 

Guardian Life Ins. Co. of America, 511 U.S. 375, 381 (1994). 

Whereas, the Parties have fully resolved this matter via a Confidential Settlement 

agreement and release of all claims and agree to the dismissal of the action with 

prejudice, with both Parties to bear their own costs and attorneys’ fees, and with the 

Court retaining continuing jurisdiction over disputes relating to the enforcement of the 

provisions of the Parties’ Confidential Settlement and Release Agreement in this matter.

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

DATED: April 14, 2015 STOEL RIVES LLP

 /s/ Thomas A. Woods

By____________________________

THOMAS A. WOODS

 Attorneys for Defendant

 ORIGEN BIOMEDICAL, INC.

DATED: April 14, 2015 NAGELEY, MEREDITH & MILLER, INC.

 /s/ Andrea M. Miller

 By_____________________________

ANDREA M. MILLER

Attorneys for Plaintiff

 THERMOGENESIS CORP.

ORDER

On review of the Parties’ Stipulation for Dismissal and for good cause appearing, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The above-captioned action is hereby dismissed with prejudice with both 

Parties to bear their own costs and reasonable attorneys’ fees, and, 

2. This Court shall retain continuing jurisdiction over any actions concerning 

Case 2:13-cv-02619-MCE-DAD Document 98 Filed 04/16/15 Page 2 of 3
- 3 –

Joint Stipulation To Voluntarily Dismiss Action With Prejudice Pursuant To Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) 

And District Court Continuing Jurisdiction Over Enforcement - Case No.: 2:13-cv-02619-MCE-DAD

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

the enforcement of the provisions of the Parties’ Confidential Settlement and Release 

Agreement related to this action. Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of America, 511 

U.S. 375 (1994).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 15, 2015

Case 2:13-cv-02619-MCE-DAD Document 98 Filed 04/16/15 Page 3 of 3