Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_20-mj-70342/USCOURTS-cand-3_20-mj-70342-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Legalo J. Haro
Defendant
USA
Plaintiff

Document Text:

[PROPOSED] DETENTION ORDER 1 v. 11/01/2018 

CR 20-70342 JSC 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DAVID L. ANDERSON (CABN 149604) 

United States Attorney 

HALLIE HOFFMAN (CABN 210020) 

Chief, Criminal Division 

ROBERT DAVID REES (CABN 229441) 

Assistant United States Attorney 

450 Golden Gate Avenue, Box 36055 

San Francisco, California 94102-3495 

Telephone: (415) 436-7210 

FAX: (415) 436-7234 

Email: robert.rees@usdoj.gov

Attorneys for United States of America 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

LEGALO J. HARO, 

Defendant. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

)

CASE NO. CR 20-70342 JSC 

[PROPOSED] DETENTION ORDER

On February 19, 2019 defendant Legalo Haro was charged in the Northern District of Florida in 

a two-count superseding indictment with conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute 50 grams or 

more of methamphetamine, 500 grams or more of a mixture containing methamphetamine, and 100 

kilograms or more of a mixture containing marijuana, all in violation of Title 21, United States Code, 

Sections 841(a)(1) and (b)(1)(A). He was also charged with a violation of money laundering 

conspiracy, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Sections 1956(a) and 1956(h). The defendant 

was arrested in the Northern District of California on March 20, 2020. 

This matter came before the Court on April 21, 2020, for a detention hearing. The defendant was 

present telephonically, with his consent, and represented by Assistant Federal Public Defender Angela 

Hanson, who also appeared telephonically. Assistant United States Attorney Robert Rees appeared for 

FILED 

SUSANY. SOONG

CLERK, U.S. DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO Apr 23 2020

Case 3:20-mj-70342-JSC Document 9 Filed 04/23/20 Page 1 of 3
[PROPOSED] DETENTION ORDER 2 v. 11/01/2018 

CR 20-70342 JSC 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

the government, also telephonically. The government moved for detention, and the defendant opposed. 

At the hearing, counsel submitted proffers and arguments regarding detention. 

Upon consideration of the facts, proffers and arguments presented, and for the reasons stated on 

the record, the Court finds by a preponderance of the evidence that no condition or combination of 

conditions will reasonably assure the appearance of the person as required in the Northern District of 

Florida. Accordingly, the defendant must be detained pending trial in this matter. 

The present order supplements the Court’s findings and order at the detention hearing and serves 

as written findings of fact and a statement of reasons as required by Title 18, United States Code, 

Section 3142(i)(1). As noted on the record, the Court makes the following findings as the bases for its 

conclusion: the defendant lacks significant ties in the Northern District of California with a transient 

lifestyle here; the defendant lacks any legitimate ties in the Northern District of Florida, where he must 

make his appearances in this case; the proposed sureties did not appear to offer significant assistance 

with being able to assure that the defendant make his appearances in the Northern District of Florida as 

required; and the defendant has little verifiable employment. These findings are made without prejudice 

to the defendant’s right to seek review of defendant’s detention, or to file a motion for reconsideration if 

circumstances warrant it. 

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3142(i), IT IS ORDERED THAT: 

1. The defendant be, and hereby is, committed to the custody of the Attorney General for 

confinement in a corrections facility separate, to the extent practicable, from persons awaiting or serving 

sentences or being held in custody pending appeal; 

2. The defendant be afforded reasonable opportunity for private consultation with counsel; 

and 

3. On order of a court of the United States or on request of an attorney for the government, 

the person in charge of the corrections facility in which the defendant is confined shall deliver the 

defendant to an authorized United States Marshal for the purpose of any appearance in connection with a 

court proceeding. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Case 3:20-mj-70342-JSC Document 9 Filed 04/23/20 Page 2 of 3
[PROPOSED] DETENTION ORDER 3 v. 11/01/2018

CR 20-70342 JSC 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DATED: ________________________________________ 

HONORABLE THOMAS S. HIXSON 

United States Magistrate Judge 

April 23, 2020

Case 3:20-mj-70342-JSC Document 9 Filed 04/23/20 Page 3 of 3