Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca5-14-40876/USCOURTS-ca5-14-40876-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Agustine Sanchez-Hernandez
Appellant
United States of America
Appellee

Document Text:

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-40876

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

AGUSTINE SANCHEZ-HERNANDEZ, also known as Agustin Sanchez,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 7:14-CR-395-1

Before DAVIS, JONES, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Agustine SanchezHernandez raises an argument that he concedes is foreclosed by United States 

v. Rodriguez, 711 F.3d 541, 562-63 & n.28 (5th Cir. 2013) (en banc), in which 

we held that the generic, contemporary definition of “sexual abuse of a minor” 

does not require the age of consent to be below 17 years old and does not include 

the asserted age-differential requirement. He also raises an argument that he 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

June 16, 2015

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 14-40876 Document: 00513079402 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/16/2015
No. 14-40876

2

concedes is foreclosed by United States v. Elizondo-Hernandez, 755 F.3d 779, 

782 (5th Cir. 2014), cert. denied, 135 S. Ct. 1011 (2015), which held that the 

Texas offense of indecency with a child by contact satisfied the generic 

definition of “sexual abuse of minor.” Accordingly, the unopposed motion for 

summary disposition is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is 

AFFIRMED.

Case: 14-40876 Document: 00513079402 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/16/2015