Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_16-cv-00482/USCOURTS-caed-1_16-cv-00482-2/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
BMO Harris Bank N.A.
Plaintiff
Charan Singh
Defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BMO HARRIS BANK N.A.,

Plaintiff,

v.

CHARAN SINGH,

Defendant.

Case No. 1:16-cv-00482-DAD-SAB

ORDER MOVING HEARING ON 

PLAINTIFF’S AMENDED MOTION FOR 

DEFAULT JUDGMENT TO SEPTEMBER 

20, 2016, AT 10:00 A.M.

ORDER TERMINATING APRIL 15, 2016 

(ECF No. 14) AND APRIL 16, 2016 (ECF 

No. 15) MOTIONS FOR DEFAULT 

JUDGMENT BECAUSE OF FILING OF 

AMENDED MOTION FOR DEFAULT 

JUDGMENT (ECF No. 16)

On April 6, 2016, Plaintiff BMO Harris Bank N.A. filed a complaint against Defendant 

Charan Singh. (ECF No. 1.) On June 3, 2016, the clerk entered default against Defendant. 

(ECF No. 9.) On August 15, 2016, Plaintiff filed a motion for default judgment against 

Defendant, and in the attached notice of motion set the hearing for September 19, 2016, at 10:00 

a.m. before the undersigned. (ECF No. 14.) However, Plaintiff wrote in its docket entry that the 

hearing was set for September 9, 2016, at 10:00 a.m. before District Judge Dale A. Drozd. On 

August 16, 2016, Plaintiff filed a notice of motion for default judgment against Defendant, which 

was identical to the notice of motion that was filed on August 15, 2016, which set the hearing for 

September 19, 2016, at 10:00 a.m. before the undersigned. (ECF No. 15.) However, Plaintiff 

wrote in its docket entry that the notice of motion and motion for entry of default judgment was 

set for September 19, 2016, at 10:00 a.m. before District Judge Dale A. Drozd. 

Case 1:16-cv-00482-DAD-SAB Document 17 Filed 08/31/16 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

On August 16, 2016, Plaintiff filed an amended notice of motion and motion for default 

judgment. (ECF No. 16.) The amended notice of motion set the hearing for September 21, 

2016, at 10:00 a.m. before the undersigned. (ECF No. 16.) The substance of Plaintiff’s amended 

motion for default judgment and the attachments (ECF No. 16) are identical to the substance of 

Plaintiff’s August 15, 2016 motion for default judgment and those attachments (ECF No. 14.)

The notices of motions for default judgment (ECF Nos. 14, 15, 16) are substantively identical

except for changing the date of the hearing and the judge that the hearing was set before. 

Plaintiff’s August 15, 2016 and August 16, 2016 motions for default judgment (ECF Nos. 

14 & 15) are terminated because of the filing of the August 16, 2016 amended motion for default

judgment (ECF No. 16). Due to the conflicts in the Court’s calendar, the hearing on Plaintiff’s 

amended motion for default judgment is moved to September 20, 2016, at 10:00 a.m. in 

Courtroom 9 before the undersigned.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The hearing on Plaintiff’s amended motion for default judgment (ECF No. 16) set 

for September 21, 2016, at 10:00 a.m. is advanced to September 20, 2016, at 

10:00 a.m. in Courtroom 9 before the undersigned;

2. Plaintiff’s August 15, 2016 motion for default judgment (ECF No. 14) and August 

16, 2016 motion for default judgment (ECF No. 15) are terminated; and

3. Plaintiff shall serve a copy of this order on Defendant and thereafter file a 

certification of service with the Clerk of the Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 30, 2016 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:16-cv-00482-DAD-SAB Document 17 Filed 08/31/16 Page 2 of 2