Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cr-00192/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cr-00192-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Rohelio Martinez-Herrera
Defendant
USA
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

CR 07-0192 SI 

SCOTT N. SCHOOLS (SCBN 9990)

United States Attorney

DOUG SPRAGUE (CASBN 202121) 

Acting Chief, Criminal Division

ERIKA R. FRICK (CSBN 208150)

Assistant United States Attorney

450 Golden Gate Avenue, Box 36055

San Francisco, California 94102

Telephone: (415) 436-6973

Facsimile: (415) 436-7234

Email: erika.frick@usdoj.gov

Attorneys for Plaintiff

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

ROHELIO MARTINEZ-HERRERA,

Defendant.

 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CR 07-0192 SI

[PROPOSED] ORDER AND

STIPULATION EXCLUDING TIME

FROM JULY 27, 2007 TO AUGUST 17,

2007 FROM THE SPEEDY TRIAL ACT

CALCULATION (18 U.S.C.

§ 3161(h)(8)(A) & (B)(iv))

On July 27, 2007, the parties appeared before Your Honor. With the agreement of the

parties, and with the consent of the defendant, the Court enters this order (1) scheduling a change

of plea before your Honor on August 17, 2007, at 11 a.m.; and (2) documenting the exclusion of

time under the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(A) & (B)(iv), from July 27, 2007 to

August 17, 2007. The parties agreed, and the Court found and held, as follows:

1. The parties agreed to an exclusion of time under the Speedy Trial Act. Failure to grant

the requested continuance would unreasonably deny both government and defense counsel

reasonable time necessary for effective case preparation because the parties are still engaged in

Case 3:07-cr-00192-SI Document 11 Filed 07/31/2007 Page 1 of 2 Case 3:07-cr-00192-SI Document 13 Filed 08/14/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

CR 07-0192 SI 2

discovery and other case preparation, and because the defendant’s petition for coram nobis

challenging one of his prior convictions is still pending in another court. Resolution of the

instant case is dependent on resolution of that petition. 

2. Given these circumstances, the Court found that the ends of justice served by

excluding the period from July 27, 2007 to August 17, 2007 outweighed the best interest of the

public and the defendant in a speedy trial. See 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(A) & (B)(iv). 

3. Accordingly, and with the consent of the defendant, the Court ordered that the period

from July 27, 2007 to August 17, 2007 be excluded from Speedy Trial Act calculations under 18

U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(A) & (B)(iv). 

4. The Court scheduled a change of plea before your Honor on August 17, 2007, at 11

a.m.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

DATED: July 31, 2007 _____/s/___________________________

ERIKA R. FRICK

Assistant United States Attorney

DATED: July 31, 2007 _____/s/___________________________

 JOSH COHEN

Attorney for Rohelio Martinez-Herrera

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED:_____________________ ________________________________

THE HON. SUSAN ILLSTON

United States District Judge

Case 3:07-cr-00192-SI Document 11 Filed 07/31/2007 Page 2 of 2 Case 3:07-cr-00192-SI Document 13 Filed 08/14/07 Page 2 of 2