Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca5-15-11094/USCOURTS-ca5-15-11094-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Rodger Jack DePute
Appellant
United States of America
Appellee

Document Text:

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-11094

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

RODGER JACK DEPUTE,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:15-CR-121-1

Before REAVLEY, ELROD, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Rodger Jack DePute raises 

an argument that is foreclosed by United States v. Groce, 784 F.3d 291, 294-95 

(5th Cir. 2015), in which we held that the knowing use of peer-to-peer file 

sharing software triggers application of the distribution enhancement under 

U.S.S.G. § 2G2.2(b)(3)(B). Accordingly, the motion for summary affirmance is

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

August 16, 2016

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 15-11094 Document: 00513638737 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/16/2016
No. 15-11094

2

GRANTED, the alternative motion for an extension of time to file a brief is 

DENIED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

 Case: 15-11094 Document: 00513638737 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/16/2016