Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-01897/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-01897-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Claude E. Finn
Defendant
Melvin Michaels
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MELVIN MICHAELS,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-05-1897 MCE KJM P

vs.

CLAUDE E. FINN, et al.,

Defendants. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

By order filed May 3, 2006, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed and thirty days’

leave to file an amended complaint was granted. The thirty day period has now expired, and

plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court’s May 3, 2006

order.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed

without prejudice. See Local Rule 11-110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty

days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written

objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s

Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the

Case 2:05-cv-01897-MCE -KJM Document 11 Filed 06/20/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951

F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: June 19, 2006.

______________________________________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

1/mp

mich1897.fta

Case 2:05-cv-01897-MCE -KJM Document 11 Filed 06/20/06 Page 2 of 2