Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-02168/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-02168-3/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Bobby Joe Mask
Petitioner
Daniel Paramo
Respondent

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BOBBY JOE MASK,

Petitioner,

v.

DANIEL PARAMO,

Respondent.

No. 2:15-cv-2168 MCE CKD P

ORDER

Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this application for a writ of habeas 

corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate 

Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On March 1, 2016, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which 

were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the 

findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Petitioner has filed 

objections to the findings and recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this 

court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the 

court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper 

analysis.

/////

Case 2:15-cv-02168-JKS Document 28 Filed 04/21/16 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed March 1, 2016, are adopted in full; 

2. Petitioner’s motions for stay (ECF Nos. 6 & 13) are granted as follows:

a. The petition (ECF No. 1) is dismissed as “mixed”;

b. No later than thirty days after dismissal, petitioner shall file an amended petition 

containing only exhausted claims;

c. Failure to timely file such an amended petition will result in this action being 

closed; and

d. Upon receipt of a fully exhausted amended petition, that court will 

administratively stay this action pursuant to Kelly, pending exhaustion of 

additional claims in the California Supreme Court.

3. Respondent’s motion to dismiss (ECF No. 12) is granted as consistent with the above; 

and

4. This case is referred back to the assigned magistrate judge for all further pretrial 

proceedings.

Dated: April 20, 2016

Case 2:15-cv-02168-JKS Document 28 Filed 04/21/16 Page 2 of 2