Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-01142/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-01142-3/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Glenn County Jail
Defendant
Dale Allen Sabin
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DALE ALLEN SABIN,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-05-1142 FCD GGH P

vs.

GLENN COUNTY JAIL, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff has filed an unserved document entitled “response to defendants’set

number one interrogatories.” In the discovery order, filed on November 14, 2005, the parties

were informed, inter alia, that “[d]iscovery requests shall be served by the parties pursuant to

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5 and Local Rule 5-135 and shall only be filed when required by

Local Rules 30-250(a), 33-250(c), 34-250(c) and 36-250(c)” [emphasis added]. This applies to a

party’s own responses to discovery requests which are not the subject of a motion to compel as

well as to a party’s discovery requests. Plaintiff has inappropriately filed his responses to

discovery requests and has compounded the error by failing to serve them upon defendants. 

\\\\\

\\\\\

\\\\\

Case 2:05-cv-01142-FCD-GGH Document 35 Filed 01/12/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Plaintiff’s November 30, 2005 “response to defendants’set number one interrogatories” will be

disregarded.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: 1/12/06

/s/ Gregory G. Hollows

GREGORY G. HOLLOWS

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

GGH:009/mp

sabi1142.411

Case 2:05-cv-01142-FCD-GGH Document 35 Filed 01/12/06 Page 2 of 2