Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca5-15-50337/USCOURTS-ca5-15-50337-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Hipolito Segura-Sanchez
Appellant
United States of America
Appellee

Document Text:

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-50337

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

HIPOLITO SEGURA-SANCHEZ,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 2:14-CR-1709-1

Before JOLLY, SOUTHWICK, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Hipolito Segura-Sanchez appeals the 12-month sentence imposed 

following the revocation of his supervised release on the grounds that it is 

procedurally and substantively unreasonable. Review is for plain error 

because Segura-Sanchez did not object. See United States v. Whitelaw, 580 

F.3d 256, 259–60 (5th Cir. 2009). 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

October 26, 2016

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 15-50337 Document: 00513734481 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/26/2016
No. 15-50337

2

Segura-Sanchez fails to demonstrate any error, plain or otherwise. A

district court does not procedurally err by weighing some 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) 

factors more heavily than others. See United States v. Hernandez, 633 F.3d 

370, 375–76 (5th Cir. 2011). His argument fails to rebut the presumption of 

reasonableness that applies to his consecutive, within-guidelines sentence. See 

United States v. Lopez-Velasquez, 526 F.3d 804, 809 (5th Cir. 2008); United 

States v. Candia, 454 F.3d 468, 473 (5th Cir. 2006); U.S.S.G. § 7B1.3(f) & cmt. 

n.4. 

The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

 Case: 15-50337 Document: 00513734481 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/26/2016