Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-09-01193/USCOURTS-ca4-09-01193-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Mayor and City Council of Baltimore City
Appellee
Jimmy Mullins
Appellant

Document Text:

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-1193

JIMMY MULLINS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF BALTIMORE CITY,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. 

(1:07-cv-02690-CCB)

Submitted: January 27, 2010 Decided: February 22, 2010

Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John B. Stolarz, THE STOLARZ LAW FIRM, Baltimore, Maryland, for 

Appellant. George A. Nilson, City Solicitor, Gwen B. Tromley, 

Assistant Solicitor, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 09-1193 Doc: 35 Filed: 02/22/2010 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Jimmy Mullins appeals the district court’s orders 

denying his motion for leave to amend his complaint and granting 

the Appellee’s motion for summary judgment on Mullins’ claim of 

age discrimination. We have reviewed the record and find no 

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated 

by the district court. Mullins v. Mayor, No. 1:07-cv-02690-CCB 

(D. Md. Jan. 20, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because 

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before the court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Appeal: 09-1193 Doc: 35 Filed: 02/22/2010 Pg: 2 of 2