Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-00166/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-00166-4/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Dana Demetrius Bairfield
Petitioner
Board of Prison Terms
Respondent

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DANA DEMETRIUS BAIRFIELD,

Petitioner, No. CIV S-05-0166 DFL DAD P

vs.

BOARD OF PRISON TERMS, et al.,

Respondents. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

By order filed November 14, 2005, petitioner was granted thirty days’ leave to file

an amended petition in which he alleges only exhausted claims. The thirty day period has now

expired and petitioner has not filed an amended petition or otherwise responded to the court’s

order.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed

without prejudice. See Local Rule 11-110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty

days after being served with these findings and recommendations, petitioner may file written

objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s

Findings and Recommendations.” Petitioner is advised that failure to file objections within the

Case 2:05-cv-00166-DFL-DAD Document 18 Filed 01/05/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951

F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: January 5, 2006.

DAD:lg

bair0166.fta

Case 2:05-cv-00166-DFL-DAD Document 18 Filed 01/05/06 Page 2 of 2