Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-00727/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-00727-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Dyncorp International LLC
Defendant
Russell McCallum
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

325542.1 1 

STIPULATION AND [Proposed] ORDER RE; FIRST AMENDED ANSWER TO COMPLAINT 

RODI POLLOCK PETTKER 

CHRISTIAN & PRAMOV

A LAW CORPORATION 

444 SOUTH FLOWER STREET, SUITE 1700 

LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90071-2901 

TELEPHONE: (213) 895-4900 

RODI POLLOCK PETTKER CHRISTIAN 

& PRAMOV, A Law Corporation 

PATRICK J. CAIN (SBN 105331) 

444 South Flower Street, Suite 1700 

Los Angeles, California 90071-2901 

Telephone: (213) 895-4900 

Facsimile: (213) 895-4921 

Attorneys for Defendant 

DYNCORP INTERNATIONAL LLC 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO DIVISION 

RUSSELL McCALLUM, 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

DYNCORP INTERNATIONAL LLC; 

a Delaware Limited Liability 

Corporation; and DOES 1 through 100, 

inclusive, 

Defendants. 

 CASE NO. 2:07-CV-00727-LKK-EFB 

STIPULATION AND ORDER RE; 

FIRST AMENDED ANSWER TO 

COMPLAINT 

ACTION FILED: October 26, 2006 

TRIAL DATE: July 7, 2009 

 

STIPULATION

Acting by and through their counsel of record, and subject to the Court’s 

approval, the parties stipulate and agree as follows: 

1. Defendant DynCorp International LLC (“DI”) wishes to file a first 

amended answer to the complaint filed by plaintiff Russell McCallum. A true and 

correct copy of the proposed first amended answer is attached as Exhibit A. DI’s 

original answer, filed while this matter was pending in state court, consisted of a 

general denial and affirmative defenses. Other than responding specifically to each 

paragraph of the complaint (rather than employing a general denial) as is required in 

federal court, the enclosed answer differs from DI’s original answer only in the 

Case 2:07-cv-00727-LKK -EFB Document 14 Filed 10/18/07 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

325542.1 2 

STIPULATION AND [Proposed] ORDER RE; FIRST AMENDED ANSWER TO COMPLAINT 

RODI POLLOCK PETTKER 

CHRISTIAN & PRAMOV

A LAW CORPORATION 

444 SOUTH FLOWER STREET, SUITE 1700 

LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90071-2901 

TELEPHONE: (213) 895-4900 

addition of two affirmative defenses: (1) failure to mitigate damages (the new 

eighth affirmative defense); and (2) that Mr. McCallum could not do his job without 

endangering himself (the new ninth affirmative defense). 

2. Mr. McCallum stipulates to the filing of DI’s proposed first amended 

answer. 

3. The filing of the first amended answer will not affect any of the 

scheduling deadlines set forth in this Court’s Status (Pretrial Scheduling) 

Conference Order dated June 27, 2007, nor will the filing of the first amended 

answer otherwise impact the progress of this matter. 

4. The parties request that the Court approve this stipulation. 

DATED: October _16, 2007 RODI POLLOCK PETTKER CHRISTIAN & 

PRAMOV, A Law Corporation 

 By: /s/ 

 PATRICK J. CAIN 

Attorneys for Defendant 

DYNCORP INTERNATIONAL LLC 

DATED: October 16, 2007 THE LAW OFFICES OF LEO F. DONAHUE, 

INC. 

 By: /s/ 

 LEO F, DONAHUE 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

RUSSELL McCALLUM 

ORDER

Based upon the foregoing stipulation, and good cause appearing therefor, the 

Court ORDERS as follows: 

1. The parties’ stipulation is approved, and the first amended answer of DI 

is deemed filed and served as of the date of this order. 

Case 2:07-cv-00727-LKK -EFB Document 14 Filed 10/18/07 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

325542.1 3 

STIPULATION AND [Proposed] ORDER RE; FIRST AMENDED ANSWER TO COMPLAINT 

RODI POLLOCK PETTKER 

CHRISTIAN & PRAMOV

A LAW CORPORATION 

444 SOUTH FLOWER STREET, SUITE 1700 

LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90071-2901 

TELEPHONE: (213) 895-4900 

2. The filing of DI’s first amended answer shall not affect any of the 

scheduling deadlines set forth in this Court’s Status (Pretrial Scheduling) 

Conference Order dated June 27, 2007. 

At Sacramento, California, this 18th day of October, 2007. 

 

Case 2:07-cv-00727-LKK -EFB Document 14 Filed 10/18/07 Page 3 of 3