Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-01281/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-01281-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Maytag Corporation
Defendant
Armida Richina
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

----oo0oo----

ARMIDA RICHINA, on behalf of

herself and all others

similarly situated,

NO. CIV. S 05-1281 MCE KJM

Plaintiff,

v. ORDER

MAYTAG CORPORATION, a Delaware

corporation,

Defendant.

----oo0oo----

Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties to this action

filed on July 14, 2005, Plaintiff may file a timely Motion to

Remand this matter at any time prior to August 8, 2005, the date

currently set for Defendant Maytag’s Motion to Dismiss pursuant

to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). Plaintiff’s Motion

to Remand, if filed, shall comport with the notice and briefing 

requirements as set forth in Local Rule 78-230.

If Plaintiff files a Motion to Remand, no briefing in

connection with the August 8, 2005 hearing date will be required

Case 2:05-cv-01281-MCE -KJM Document 25 Filed 07/27/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

prior to that date and Maytag’s Motion to Dismiss will be stayed,

pending the Court’s ruling on Plaintiff’s Motion to Remand. In

the event that Plaintiff’s Motion to Remand is denied,

Plaintiff’s opposition to Maytag’s Motion to Dismiss, if any,

shall be filed and served not later than fourteen (14) days after

proof of mailed or electronic service of the Court’s ruling on

Plaintiff’s Motion to Remand. Maytag’s reply, if any, in support

of its Motion to Dismiss will be filed and served nine (9) days

after the mailed or electronic service of Plaintiff’s opposition. 

Upon filing of its reply brief in support of its Motion to

Dismiss, Maytag will notify the courtroom deputy, Amanda

Souvannarath, that its Motion to Dismiss should be set for the

next available civil motion calendar date before this Court. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: July 27, 2005

_____________________________

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:05-cv-01281-MCE -KJM Document 25 Filed 07/27/05 Page 2 of 2