Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_13-cv-00093/USCOURTS-caed-1_13-cv-00093-8/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
City of Delano, California
Defendant
Robin Moniz
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

On January 12, 2015, the parties filed a joint notice that the matter has been settled in full. 

(Doc. 46) Thereafter, the Court issued an order requiring the parties to file a stipulated dismissal by 

February 13, 2015. (Doc. 47) However, the Court granted stipulations to extend this deadline on 

February 17 and March 13, 2015. (Docs. 49, 51) 

In the last order granting an extension of time to file the dismissal, the Court noted that the two 

stipulations used nearly the exact same language without demonstrating what impediment existed to 

completing the settlement and ordered, “The court will GRANT this last stipulation making the filing 

of the dismissal to occur no later than April 10, 2015. No further extensions of time will be 

granted.” (Doc. 51 at 2) Despite this, no stipulated request for dismissal has been filed. Therefore, 

the Court ORDERS:

///

///

ROBIN MONIZ,

 Plaintiff,

v.

CITY OF DELANO, CALIFORNIA,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: 1:13-cv-00093 - JLT

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY SANCTIONS 

SHOULD NOT BE IMPOSED FOR FAILURE TO 

FILE THE STIPULATED REQUEST FOR 

DISMISSAL

Case 1:13-cv-00093-JLT Document 52 Filed 05/14/15 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1. No later than May 29, 2015, the parties SHALL show cause in writing why sanctions 

should not be imposed for their failure to comply with the Court’s orders. Alternatively, the parties 

may file the stipulated request for dismissal within this same time period.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 14, 2015 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:13-cv-00093-JLT Document 52 Filed 05/14/15 Page 2 of 2