Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-00495/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-00495-4/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Serna
Defendant
William Sigur
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

U.S. District Court

 E. D. California 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

)

WILLIAM SIGUR, )

)

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. )

)

C/O SERNA, )

) 

Defendant. )

____________________________________)

CV F- 06-0495 OWW DLB P 

ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO

SUBMIT USM 285 FORMS

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with a civil rights

complaint transferred to this court on April 26, 2006. The complaint appears to state cognizable

claims for relief for violation of the Eighth Amendment against the named defendant. Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Service is appropriate for defendant Officer Serna.

2. The Clerk of the Court shall send Plaintiff one (1) USM-285 form, one (1) summons,

a Notice of Submission of Documents form, an instruction sheet and a copy of the

complaint filed February 1, 1996.

3. Within THIRTY (30) DAYS from the date of this Order, Plaintiff shall complete the

attached Notice of Submission of Documents and submit the completed Notice to the

Case 1:06-cv-00495-OWW -DLB Document 14 Filed 04/06/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

U.S. District Court

 E. D. California 2

Court with the following documents:

a. Completed summons;

b. One completed USM-285 form for each defendant listed above; and 

c. Two (2) copies of the endorsed complaint filed February 1, 2006.

4. Plaintiff need not attempt service on Defendants and need not request waiver of

service. Upon receipt of the above-described documents, the court will direct the

United States Marshal to serve the above-named Defendants pursuant to Federal Rule

of Civil Procedure 4 without payment of costs. 

5. The failure to comply with this Order will result in a Recommendation that this action

be dismissed.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: April 5, 2007 /s/ Dennis L. Beck 

3c0hj8 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-00495-OWW -DLB Document 14 Filed 04/06/07 Page 2 of 2