Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-01692/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-01692-2/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Christopher R. Bates
Petitioner
Dennis Smith
Respondent

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CHRISTOPHER R. BATES, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

vs. )

)

)

DENNIS SMITH, Warden, )

)

Respondent. )

)

)

___________________________________ )

1:06-cv-01692 -OWW WMW HC

ORDER ADOPTING

FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS RE

MOTION FOR DISMISSAL OF

PETITION FOR WRIT OF

HABEAS CORPUS

[Doc.5, 6]

Petitioner, a federal prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a petition

for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. Pending before the court is

Respondent’s motion to dismiss. Petitioner has not opposed the motion.

On April 23, 2007, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations herein. 

These findings and recommendations were served on the parties and contained notice to the

parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within thirty

days. Petitioner did not file objections. 

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)C) this court has

Case 1:06-cv-01692-OWW -WMW Document 7 Filed 06/07/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 2

conducted a de novo review of this case. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708

F.2d 452, 454 (9 Cir. 1983). Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the th

findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis because

the BOP has considered Petitioner’s request for assignment to a Residential Re-entry Center, 

the claim is moot. 

Based on the foregoing, it is HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations issued by the Magistrate Judge on 

April 23, 2007, are a adopted in full;

2. Respondent’s motion to dismiss is GRANTED;

3. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DISMISSED;

4. The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment for Respondent and to close this

case. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 7, 2007 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger 

emm0d6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-01692-OWW -WMW Document 7 Filed 06/07/07 Page 2 of 2