Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-02031/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-02031-5/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Ninoska Caldera
Plaintiff
Commissioner of Social Security
Defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

NINOSKA CALDERA, No. 2:15-CV-2031-CMK

Plaintiff, 

vs. ORDER

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL

SECURITY,

Defendant.

 /

Plaintiff, who is proceeding with retained counsel, brings this action under 

42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security.

A review of the docket reflects that defendant has notified the court regarding consent to proceed

before a Magistrate Judge. Plaintiff, however, has not notified the court regarding consent. 

Pursuant to the court’s scheduling order and Eastern District of California Local Rules, Appendix

A, the time to do so has now expired. As of October 13, 2016, plaintiff had not complied and the

court directed plaintiff to show cause why the action should not be dismissed for failure to

comply with court rules and orders. Plaintiff was warned that failure to respond to the order to

show cause could result in dismissal of the entire action, both for failure to inform the court

1

Case 2:15-cv-02031-KJM-CMK Document 23 Filed 01/12/17 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

regarding consent and failure to comply with the order to show cause. 

To date, plaintiff has neither notified the court regarding consent nor otherwise

responded to the court’s October 13, 2016, order to show cause. Plaintiff shall now show cause

in writing, within 15 days of the date of this order, why the entire action should not be dismissed

for lack of prosecution and failure to comply with court rules and orders. Plaintiff is cautioned

that failure to respond to this order will result in dismissal of the action. See Local Rule 110. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: January 12, 2017

______________________________________

CRAIG M. KELLISON

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

2

Case 2:15-cv-02031-KJM-CMK Document 23 Filed 01/12/17 Page 2 of 2