Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_03-cv-01694/USCOURTS-caed-2_03-cv-01694-10/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Tom L. Carey
Respondent
Alfred Lee Grayson
Petitioner

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 1

Timothy E. Warriner (SB#166128)

Attorney at Law

813 6th St., Suite 450

Sacramento, CA 95814

(916) 443-7141

FAX: (916) 441-0970

Attorney for Petitioner,

ALFRED LEE GRAYSON

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ALFRED LEE GRAYSON, ) No. Civ. S-03-1694 MCE KJM

)

Petitioner, ) STIPULATION AND ORDER

) FOR MODIFICATION OF 

v. ) BRIEFING SCHEDULE

)

TOM L. CAREY, Warden, )

)

Respondent. )

____________________________________)

This matter is in the District Court after remand from the Ninth Circuit. Pursuant to the

remand order, the court is to consider the issue of procedural default, and if there is no

procedural default, is to evaluate the confrontation clause claim pursuant to Ohio v. Roberts, 448

U.S. 56 (1980).

The parties have previously stipulated to a briefing schedule. Petitioner’s counsel has

continued to work diligently to complete the briefing in this case, and has made substantial

progress toward completion of the work. However, due to the complexity of the issues, and

counsel’s obligations toward completion of the opening brief in People v. In re Brian R. (5th Dist.

No. F57971), and preparation for a preliminary hearing in People v. Ayob (Stanislaus County),

counsel for petitioner needs an additional extension of time. In light thereof, the parties have

stipulated to the modification of the briefing schedule. To afford counsel additional time needed

to research and brief this matter, the parties hereby stipulate and agree that the court adopt the

Case 2:03-cv-01694-MCE-TJB Document 56 Filed 01/15/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 2

following briefing schedule: petitioner’s points and authorities will be due February 4, 2010,

respondent’s points and authorities will be due March 4, 2010, and petitioner’s reply will be due

on April 4, 2010. 

DATED: January 13, 2010 /s/ Tim Warriner, Attorney for Petitioner, ALFRED LEE GRAYSON

DATED: January 13, 2010 / s/ Janis McLean, Deputy Attorney General, 

 ORDER

GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, and pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, it is hereby

ordered that petitioner’s points and authorities will be due February 4, 2010, respondent’s points

and authorities will be due March 4, 2010, and petitioner’s reply will be due on April 4, 2010. 

No further extensions will be granted. 

DATED: January 15, 2010. 

Case 2:03-cv-01694-MCE-TJB Document 56 Filed 01/15/10 Page 2 of 2