Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-02460/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-02460-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Monica Alfaro
Defendant
Mika Christina Alfaro
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MIKA CHRISTINA ALFARO,

Plaintiff, CIV-S-06-2460 LKK GGH PS

vs.

MONICA ALFARO,

Defendant. ORDER

__________________________________/

On December 5, 2006, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations

herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the

findings and recommendations were to be filed within ten days. No objections were filed.

 Accordingly, the court presumes any findings of fact are correct. See Orland v.

United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1999). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are

reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir.

1983).

The court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and, good cause appearing,

concludes that it is appropriate to adopt the Proposed Findings and Recommendations in full.

\\\\\

\\\\\

Case 2:06-cv-02460-LKK -GGH Document 5 Filed 01/26/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that:

1. The Proposed Findings and Recommendations filed December 5, 2006, are

ADOPTED; 

2. Plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis, filed November 6, 2006, is

DENIED with prejudice;

3. Plaintiff’s complaint, filed November 6, 2006, is DISMISSED with prejudice.

DATED: January 25, 2007.

Case 2:06-cv-02460-LKK -GGH Document 5 Filed 01/26/07 Page 2 of 2