Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca11-24-13183/USCOURTS-ca11-24-13183-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Bryan
Appellee
DeAndre D. Currington
Appellant
Dustin R. Folk
Appellee
Juneau
Appellee

Document Text:

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

In the

United States Court of Appeals

For the Eleventh Circuit

____________________

No. 24-13183

Non-Argument Calendar

____________________

DEANDRE D. CURRINGTON, 

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

COMMANDER JUNEAU, 

DEPUTY CHIEF BRYAN, 

DUSTIN R. FOLK, 

Cpl.,

Defendants-Appellees.

____________________

USCA11 Case: 24-13183 Document: 12-1 Date Filed: 12/26/2024 Page: 1 of 2
2 Opinion of the Court 24-13183

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Alabama

D.C. Docket No. 1:22-cv-00397-MHT-CSC

____________________

Before WILSON, ROSENBAUM, and ABUDU, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

The appellees’ motion to dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction is GRANTED, and this appeal is DISMISSED. While the 

district court has entered numerous orders resolving DeAndre D. 

Currington’s various motions in this pending case, none of those 

orders ended the underlying litigation on the merits and, accordingly, none of those orders are final. See 28 U.S.C. § 1291; CSX 

Transp., Inc. v. City of Garden City, 235 F.3d 1325, 1327 (11th Cir. 

2000); Supreme Fuels Trading FZE v. Sargeant, 689 F.3d 1244, 1246 

(11th Cir. 2012). Most of those orders concerned discovery, 

amendment of pleadings, and appointment of counsel, matters 

which are not ordinarily immediately appealable. See Doe No. 1 v. 

United States, 749 F.3d 999, 1004 (11th Cir. 2014) (concerning discovery orders); Wells v. S. Main Bank, 532 F.2d 1005, 1005-06 (5th 

Cir. 1976) (concerning amendment of pleadings); Hodges v. Dep’t of 

Corr., 895 F.2d 1360, 1361-62 (11th Cir. 1990) (concerning appointment of counsel). Further, none of those orders are appealable as 

collateral orders because they would all be reviewable on appeal 

from a final judgment. See Acheron Cap., Ltd. v. Mukamal, 22 F.4th 

979, 989 (11th Cir. 2022). 

USCA11 Case: 24-13183 Document: 12-1 Date Filed: 12/26/2024 Page: 2 of 2