Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-10-06046/USCOURTS-ca4-10-06046-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
David L. Reynolds
Appellant
Supreme Court of Virginia
Appellee

Document Text:

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-6046

DAVID L. REYNOLDS,

Petitioner – Appellant,

v.

SUPREME COURT OF VIRGINIA,

Respondent – Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior 

District Judge. (1:09-cv-01079-JCC-TRJ)

Submitted: March 30, 2010 Decided: April 29, 2010

Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

David L. Reynolds, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 10-6046 Doc: 15 Filed: 04/29/2010 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

David L. Reynolds appeals the district court’s order 

denying his motion for a writ of mandamus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 

§ 1651 (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no 

reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to 

proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by 

the district court. Reynolds v. Supreme Court of Virginia, No. 

1:09-cv-01079-JCC-TRJ (E.D. Va. Nov. 24, 2009). Additionally, 

we deny as unnecessary Reynolds’ motion for a certificate of 

appealability. We dispense with oral argument because the facts 

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

AFFIRMED

Appeal: 10-6046 Doc: 15 Filed: 04/29/2010 Pg: 2 of 2