Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_15-cv-02512/USCOURTS-cand-4_15-cv-02512-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
BMO Capital Markets Corp.
Defendant
L. Daniel Browne
Defendant
Robert Byrnes
Defendant
City of Warren Police and Fire Retirement System
Plaintiff
Cowen and Company, LLC
Defendant
Ronald W. Eastman
Defendant
Phyllis Gardner
Defendant
James Glasheen
Defendant
Piper Jaffray & Co.
Defendant
Revance Therapeutics, Inc.
Defendant
Lauren P. Silvernail
Defendant
Jonathan Tunnicliffe
Defendant
Jacob Waugh
Defendant
William Blair & Company, L.L.C.
Defendant
Ronald Wooten
Defendant

Document Text:

COOLEY LLP

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

PALO ALTO

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

118082674 v1 1. JOINT STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE TIME 

TO OPPOSE MOTION TO REMAND 

3:15-CV-02512-HSG

COOLEY LLP

JOHN C. DWYER (136533) (dwyerjc@cooley.com)

SHANNON M. EAGAN (212830) (seagan@cooley.com)

ADAM C. TRIGG (261498) (atrigg@cooley.com)

3175 Hanover Street

Palo Alto, CA 94304-1130

Telephone: (650) 843-5000

Facsimile: (650) 849-7400

Attorneys for Defendants

REVANCE THERAPEUTICS, INC., L DANIEL BROWNE, 

LAUREN P. SILVERNAIL, JACOB WAUGH, ROBERT 

BYRNES, RONALD EASTMAN, PHYLLIS GARDNER, 

JAMES GLASHEEN, JONATHAN TUNNICLIFFE, and 

RONALD WOOTEN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

CITY OF WARREN POLICE AND FIRE 

RETIREMENT SYSTEM, Individually and 

on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated,

Plaintiff,

v.

REVANCE THERAPEUTICS, INC., L. 

DANIEL BROWNE, LAUREN P. 

SILVERNAIL, JACOB WAUGH, ROBERT 

BYRNES, RONALD W. EASTMAN, 

PHYLLIS GARDNER, JAMES GLASHEEN, 

JONATHAN TUNNICLIFFE, RONALD 

WOOTEN, COWEN AND COMPANY, 

LLC, PIPER JAFFRAY & CO., BMO 

CAPITAL MARKETS CORP., WILLIAM 

BLAIR & COMPANY, LLC, AND DOES 1-

25, inclusive,

Defendants.

Case No. 3:15-cv-02512-HSG

CLASS ACTION

STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING 

TIME TO OPPOSE MOTION TO REMAND

Date: August 6, 2015

Time: 2:00 PM

Judge: Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam Jr.

Pursuant to United States District Court for the Northern District of California Civil Local 

Rules (“L.R”) 6-2 and 7-12, Defendants Revance Therapeutics, Inc., L. Daniel Browne, Lauren P. 

Silvernail, Jacob Waugh, Robert Byrnes, Ronald W. Eastman, Phyllis Gardner, James Glasheen, 

Case 4:15-cv-02512-HSG Document 12 Filed 06/17/15 Page 1 of 6
COOLEY LLP

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

PALO ALTO

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

118082674 v1 2. JOINT STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE TIME 

TO OPPOSE MOTION TO REMAND 

3:15-CV-02512-HSG

Jonathan Tunnicliffe, Ronald Wooten, Cowen and Company LLC, Piper Jaffray & Co., BMO 

Capital Markets, Corp., and William Blair & Company, LLC (“Defendants”) and Plaintiff City of 

Warren Police and Fire Retirement System, (“Plaintiff”) (collectively, “the Parties”), hereby 

agree and stipulate that good cause exists to request an order from this Court (i) extending 

Defendants’ time to file an opposition to Plaintiff’s motion to remand, and (ii) extending 

Plaintiff’s time to file its reply to Defendants’ opposition to the motion to remand. 

RECITALS

WHEREAS, on May 1, 2015, Plaintiff filed a putative class action, “City of Warren Police 

and Fire Retirement System v. Revance Therapeutics, Inc. et. al.,” Case No. CIV 533635 against 

Defendants in San Mateo Superior Court alleging violations of the Federal Securities Laws (the 

“Complaint”);

WHEREAS, on June 5, 2015, Defendants removed the action to federal court (Dkt. 1);

WHEREAS, on June 5, 2015, the action was assigned to the Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam Jr. 

(Dkt. 3);

WHEREAS, on June 8, 2015, this Court issued an Order setting an Initial Case 

Management Conference for September 8, 2015, at 2:00 PM (Dkt. 4);

WHEREAS, on June 9, 2015, the parties stipulated under Civil L.R. 6-1(a) that, in light of 

the anticipated remand motion and opposition, and in the interests of judicial economy and 

preservation of the Court’s and the parties’ resources, Defendants need not respond to the pending 

Complaint, but would respond within 30 days of Plaintiff amending the Complaint or designating 

an operative complaint (Dkt. 7);

WHEREAS, on June 9, 2015, Plaintiff filed a motion to remand the action to state court, 

indicating August 6, 2015 at 2:00 PM as the date and time for hearing on the motion. (Dkt. 8); 

WHEREAS, Defendants intend to oppose the remand motion;

WHEREAS, pursuant to Civil L.R. 7-3 Defendants’ opposition to the motion to remand 

must be filed not more than 14 days after the motion to remand was filed, and Plaintiff’s reply 

must be filed not more than 7 days after the opposition was due;

Case 4:15-cv-02512-HSG Document 12 Filed 06/17/15 Page 2 of 6
COOLEY LLP

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

PALO ALTO

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

118082674 v1 3. JOINT STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE TIME 

TO OPPOSE MOTION TO REMAND 

3:15-CV-02512-HSG

WHEREAS, pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-2, the parties may file a stipulation, conforming to 

Civil L.R. 7-12, requesting an order changing time that would affect the date of an event or 

deadline already fixed by Court order, or that would accelerate or extend time frames set in the 

Local Rules or in the Federal Rules; 

WHEREAS, to accommodate scheduling conflicts and Counsel’s travel commitments, 

Defendants require a brief extension of time to respond to the motion to remand. 

NOW THEREFORE, the Parties hereby STIPULATE and AGREE as follows:

1. Defendants’ opposition to the motion to remand shall be filed on or before July 2, 

2015. 

2. Plaintiff’s reply to the opposition to the motion to remand shall be filed on or 

before July 14, 2015.

3. The hearing on the remand motion will occur as currently scheduled on August 6, 

2015, at 2:00 PM. 

Case 4:15-cv-02512-HSG Document 12 Filed 06/17/15 Page 3 of 6
COOLEY LLP

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

PALO ALTO

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

118082674 v1 4. JOINT STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE TIME 

TO OPPOSE MOTION TO REMAND 

3:15-CV-02512-HSG

Dated: June 16, 2015 COOLEY LLP

/s/ Shannon M. Eagan

Shannon M. Eagan (212830)

Attorneys for Defendants

REVANCE THERAPEUTICS, INC., L DANIEL 

BROWNE, LAUREN P. SILVERNAIL, JACOB 

WAUGH, ROBERT BYRNES, RONALD W. 

EASTMAN, PHYLLIS GARDNER, JAMES 

GLASHEEN, JONATHAN TUNNICLIFFE, and 

RONALD WOOTEN

Dated: June 16, 2015 DECHERT LLP

/s/ Joshua D. N. Hess

Joshua D. N. Hess (244115)

DECHERT LLP

One Bush Street 

Suite 1600 

San Francisco, CA 94104 

415.262.4583 direct 

415.262.4555 fax 

joshua.hess@dechert.com

Attorneys for Defendants

COWEN AND COMPANY, LLC, PIPER 

JAFFRAY & CO., BMO CAPITAL MARKETS 

CORP., WILLIAM BLAIR & COMPANY, LLC

Case 4:15-cv-02512-HSG Document 12 Filed 06/17/15 Page 4 of 6
COOLEY LLP

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

PALO ALTO

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

118082674 v1 5. JOINT STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE TIME 

TO OPPOSE MOTION TO REMAND 

3:15-CV-02512-HSG

Dated: June 16, 2015 ROBBINS GELLAR RUDMAN & DOWD LLP

/s/ James I. Jaconette

James I. Jaconette (179565)

ROBBINS GELLAR RUDMAN 

 & DOWD LLP

JAMES I. JACONETTE (179565)

655 West Broadway, Suite 1900

San Diego, CA 92101

Telephone: 619/231-1058

619/231-7423 (fax)

 – and –

SHAWN A. WILLIAMS (213113)

Post Montgomery Center

One Montgomery Street, Suite 1800

San Francisco, CA 94104

Telephone: 415/288-4545

415/288-4534 (fax)

Attorneys for Plaintiff

* * *

ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: June 17, 2015

Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr.

United States District Court Judge

Case 4:15-cv-02512-HSG Document 12 Filed 06/17/15 Page 5 of 6
COOLEY LLP

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

PALO ALTO

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

118082674 v1 6. JOINT STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE TIME 

TO OPPOSE MOTION TO REMAND 

3:15-CV-02512-HSG

ATTESTATION OF CONCURRENCE IN FILING

Pursuant to United States District Court for the Northern District of California, Civil L. R. 

5-1(i), I, Shannon M. Eagan, hereby attest that the concurrence to the filing of the foregoing 

document has been obtained from Joshua D. N. Hess and James I. Jaconette, who have provided 

the conformed signatures above.

Dated: June 16, 2015 COOLEY LLP

/s/ Shannon M. Eagan

Shannon M. Eagan (212830)

Attorneys for Defendants

REVANCE THERAPEUTICS, INC., L DANIEL 

BROWNE, LAUREN P. SILVERNAIL, JACOB 

WAUGH, ROBERT BYRNES, RONALD 

EASTMAN, PHYLLIS GARDNER, JAMES 

GLASHEEN, JONATHAN TUNNICLIFFE, and 

RONALD WOOTEN

Case 4:15-cv-02512-HSG Document 12 Filed 06/17/15 Page 6 of 6