Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-10-06637/USCOURTS-ca4-10-06637-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Steve Dias
Appellant
United States of America
Appellee

Document Text:

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-6637

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

STEVE DIAS, a/k/a Troy, a/k/a O’Neil Guthrie,

Defendant – Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, District 

Judge. (3:04-cr-00259-HEH-2)

Submitted: July 27, 2010 Decided: August 9, 2010

Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and WILKINSON and KEENAN, Circuit 

Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Steve Dias, Appellant Pro Se. Olivia N. Hawkins, OFFICE OF THE 

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Stephen David Schiller, Assistant United 

States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 10-6637 Doc: 5 Filed: 08/09/2010 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Steve Dias appeals the district court’s order denying 

his second 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for reduction of 

sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible 

error. Accordingly, we affirm. United States v. Dias, No. 

3:04-cr-00259-HEH-2 (E.D. Va. Mar. 1, 2010); see also United 

States v. Goodwyn, 596 F.3d 233, 234-46 (4th Cir. 2010) (holding 

that district court lacked authority to grant defendant’s motion 

to reconsider, filed eight months after the district court’s 

order ruling on original § 3582(c)(2) motion). We dispense with 

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before the court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Appeal: 10-6637 Doc: 5 Filed: 08/09/2010 Pg: 2 of 2