Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_15-cv-00874/USCOURTS-caed-1_15-cv-00874-3/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Commissioner of Social Security
Defendant
Shoa Eshraghi
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

DEBORAH LEE STACHEL

Acting Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX

Social Security Administration

JEFFREY CHEN, CSBN 260516

Special Assistant United States Attorney

Social Security Administration

160 Spear Street, Suite 800

San Francisco, CA 94105

Telephone: (415) 977-8939

Facsimile: (415) 744-0134

Email: Jeffrey.Chen@ssa.gov

Attorneys for Defendant

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

FRESNO DIVISION

SHOA ESHRAGHI,

Plaintiff,

v.

CAROLYN W. COLVIN, 

Acting Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Civil No. 1:15-cv-00874-EPG

STIPULATION FOR

VOLUNTARY REMAND PURSUANT TO 

SENTENCE FOUR OF 42 U.S.C. § 405(g); 

ORDER

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between Shoa Eshraghi (Plaintiff) and Carolyn 

W. Colvin, Acting Commissioner of Social Security (the Commissioner or Defendant), through 

their respective counsel of record, that this action be remanded for further administrative action 

pursuant to section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, as amended, 42 U.S.C. section 405(g), 

sentence four.

On remand, the Appeals Council will remand the case to an administrative law judge 

(ALJ) for a new hearing and decision. The Appeals Counsel will instruct the ALJ to evaluate 

Plaintiff's past relevant work prior to the time period adjudicated, whether any work after the 

Case 1:15-cv-00874-EPG Document 24 Filed 04/15/16 Page 1 of 3
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

alleged onset date qualifies for consideration under the work incentives under the Act, and to 

determine what jobs exist, if any, for Plaintiff given his age, education, vocational factors and 

residual functional capacity.

The parties further request that the Clerk of the Court be directed to enter a final 

judgment in favor of Plaintiff, and against Defendant, reversing the final decision of the 

Commissioner.

Respectfully submitted,

Date: April 13, 2016 LAW OFFICES OF LAWRENCE D. ROHLFING

By: /s/ Lawrence Rohlfing* 

LAWRENCE ROHLFING

* By email authorization on April 12, 2016

Attorney for Plaintiff

Date: April 13, 2016 BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

By: /s/ Jeffrey Chen 

JEFFREY CHEN

Special Assistant United States Attorney

Attorneys for Defendant

Case 1:15-cv-00874-EPG Document 24 Filed 04/15/16 Page 2 of 3
3

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Based on the above stipulation, the above-captioned action is remanded to the 

Commissioner of Social Security for further proceedings consistent with the terms of the 

stipulation. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to enter final judgment in favor of Plaintiff 

Shoa Eshraghi and against Defendant Carolyn W. Colvin and to close this case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 14, 2016 /s/

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:15-cv-00874-EPG Document 24 Filed 04/15/16 Page 3 of 3