Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cr-00400/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cr-00400-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Andre Benard
Defendant
USA
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND ORDER 

CR 05-00400 SI

KEVIN V. RYAN (CSBN 118321)

United States Attorney

EUMI CHOI (WVSBN 0722)

Acting Chief, Criminal Division

EDWARD TORPOCO (CSBN 200653)

Assistant United States Attorney

450 Golden Gate Avenue, Box 36055

San Francisco, California 94102-3495

Telephone: (415) 436-7071

FAX: (415) 436-7234

Attorneys for Plaintiff UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) No.: CR 05-00400 SI

)

Plaintiff, ) STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]

) ORDER EXCLUDING TIME

v. ) FROM SPEEDY TRIAL CALCULATION

)

ANDRE BENARD, )

)

 Defendant. )

____________________________________) 

With the agreement of the parties, the Court enters this Order excluding the time period

from August 19, 2005, through September 2, 2005 under the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161. 

The parties agree, and the Court finds and holds, as follows:

1. The parties had their first appearance before the Court on August 19, 2005. 

Defense counsel, who was appointed that morning to represent the Defendant, stated that he

required time to obtain and review discovery. The Court therefore excluded time based on the

need for effective preparation of counsel and set a further status hearing date of 11:00 a.m. on

September 2, 2005.

2. In light of the foregoing facts, the parties have stipulated and continue to stipulate 

that the failure to grant the requested continuance would unreasonably deny the Defendant

effective preparation of counsel taking into account the exercise of due diligence, that the ends of

Case 3:05-cr-00400-SI Document 8 Filed 08/25/2005 Page 1 of 2
 Case 3:05-cr-00400-SI Document 9 Filed 08/26/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 STIPULATION AND ORDER 

CR 05-00400 SI 2

justice would be served by the Court excluding the proposed time period, that these ends

outweigh the best interest of the public and the Defendant in a speedy trial, and that the time

period from August 19, 2005 through September 2, 2005 shall be excluded from the Speedy Trial

Act calculation. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(A), (B)(iv).

SO STIPULATED.

DATED:__August 24, 2005______ _/S/ DAVID FERMINO_______

DAVID FERMINO

Attorney for Defendant Andre Benard

DATED:__August 23 2005___ _/S/ EDWARD TORPOO_____

EDWARD TORPOCO

Assistant United States Attorney

In light of the foregoing facts, and with the consent of the parties, the Court hereby orders

that the period from August 19, 2005 through September 2, 2005 be excluded from the Speedy

Trial Act calculation under 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(A), B(iv).

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED:___________________ _________________________________

HON. SUSAN ILLSTON

United States District Judge

Case 3:05-cr-00400-SI Document 8 Filed 08/25/2005 Page 2 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

GRANTED

Judge Susan Illston

Case 3:05-cr-00400-SI Document 9 Filed 08/26/05 Page 2 of 2