Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-00560/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-00560-2/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Paul Augusto
Defendant
City of Fairfield
Defendant
Tanya Creal
Plaintiff
Chuck Timm
Defendant

Document Text:

____________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 

[Proposed] Order Granting Stipulated Motion to Modify Scheduling Order [06-00560 WBS (EFB)] 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Kimberly E. Colwell, Esq. (SBN: 127604) 

kcolwell@meyersnave.com 

Jennifer C. Addams, Esq. (SBN: 209355) 

jaddams@meyersnave.com 

MEYERS, NAVE, RIBACK, SILVER & WILSON 

555 12th Street, Suite 1500 

Oakland, CA 94607 

Telephone: (510) 808-2000 

Facsimile: (510) 444-1108 

Attorneys for Defendants 

CITY OF FAIRFIELD, PAUL AUGUSTO 

and CHUCK TIMM 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

TANYA CREAL, 

 Plaintiff, 

v. 

CITY OF FAIRFIELD; PAUL AUGUSTO; 

CHUCK TIMM; DOES 1-10, 

Defendants. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Case No: 06-CV-00560 WBS (EFB) 

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED 

MOTION TO MODIFY SCHEDULING 

ORDER

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 2:06-cv-00560-WBS-EFB Document 25 Filed 12/11/06 Page 1 of 2
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 

[Proposed] Order Granting Stipulated Motion to Modify Scheduling Order [06-00560 WBS (EFB)] 1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Pursuant to stipulation of the parties, the scheduling order in this case is modified as follows: 

a. The parties have shown good cause for an extension of the non-expert discovery cutoff date. Due to the fact that the pleadings in this matter were not settled until September 19, 2006 

and due to the unavailability of the Plaintiff until December, 2006, non-expert discovery is hereby 

extended 90 days from the original cut-off date of January 12, 2007. The new non-expert discovery 

cut-off date will be April 12, 2007. 

b. For the reasons stated above, the last day for this Court to hear a motion for summary 

judgment has been extended 90 days from the original date of April 13, 2007. The last day a motion 

for summary judgment may be heard in this case will be July 13, 2007. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: December 11, 2006 

878981_1.DOC

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 2:06-cv-00560-WBS-EFB Document 25 Filed 12/11/06 Page 2 of 2