Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-03177/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-03177-6/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Research In Motion Corporation
Counter-claimant
Research in Motion Limited
Counter-claimant
Visto Corporation
Counter-claimant

Document Text:

MANATT, PHELPS &

PHILLIPS, LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

PALO ALTO

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

MODIFYING PATENT RULE 4-3 SCHEDULE 

MANATT, PHELPS & PHILLIPS, LLP 

ROBERT D. BECKER (Bar No. CA 160648) 

E-mail: rbecker@manatt.com

EUGENE L. HAHM (Bar No. CA 167596) 

E-mail : ehahm@manatt.com

SHAWN G. HANSEN (Bar No. CA 197033) 

E-mail: shansen@manatt.com

1001 Page Mill Road, Building 2 

Palo Alto, CA 94304-1006 

Telephone: (650) 812-1300 

Facsimile: (650) 213-0260 

Attorneys for Defendant

and Counterclaimant 

VISTO CORPORATION 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

RESEARCH IN MOTION LIMITED, 

Plaintiff, 

vs.

VISTO CORPORATION, 

Defendant.

Case No. C-07- 3177 (MMC) 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

MODIFYING COURT DEADLINE UNDER 

PATENT RULE 4-3 

VISTO CORPORATION, 

Counterclaimant, 

vs.

RESEARCH IN MOTION LIMITED, and 

RESEARCH IN MOTION 

CORPORATION, 

Counterdefendants.

Case 3:07-cv-03177-MMC Document 41 Filed 03/04/08 Page 1 of 4
MANATT, PHELPS &

PHILLIPS, LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

PALO ALTO

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 2 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

MODIFYING PATENT RULE 4-3 SCHEDULE 

Visto Corporation and Research In Motion Limited and Research In Motion Corporation, 

through their respective counsel, stipulate as follows: 

1. On October 1, 2007, the parties filed a CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER (Docket 

No. 21) (“Case Management Order”); 

2. On October 9, 2007, the Court issued an order adopting with certain exceptions the 

Case Management Order (Docket No. 22); 

3. Under the Case Management Order, the filing of the Joint Claim Construction and 

Prehearing Statement under Patent L.R. 4-3 was originally scheduled for February 

11, 2008; 

4. On January 9, 2008, the parties filed a stipulation (Docket No. 26) extending 

certain Patent Local Rule deadlines, which included a request that the filing date of 

the Joint Claim Construction and Prehearing Statement be moved to February 25, 

2008;

5. On January 11, 2008, the Court entered an order (Docket No. 27) extending the 

deadlines set forth in the parties’ stipulation; 

6. On February 22, 2008, the Court further extended the deadline for the filing of the 

Joint Claim Construction and Prehearing Statement until March 3, 2008; and 

7. The Parties believe that an additional extension of time will enable them to 

complete the meet and confer process on the terms to be construed. 

In order to complete a meaningful meet and confer on the terms to be construed, the 

parties hereby agree, subject to approval by the Court, to the following modifications to the Case 

Management Order: 

1. The date for filing the Joint Claim Construction and Prehearing Statement under 

Patent L.R. 4-3 shall be extended from March 3, 2008 to March 17, 2008;

2. This stipulation is limited to compliance with Patent L.R. 4-3 and does not relate 

to any other phase of this case; and 

3. No other deadlines under the Case Management Order are affected by this 

Case 3:07-cv-03177-MMC Document 41 Filed 03/04/08 Page 2 of 4
MANATT, PHELPS &

PHILLIPS, LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

PALO ALTO

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 3 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

MODIFYING PATENT RULE 4-3 SCHEDULE 

stipulation.

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

DATED: March 3, 2008 MANATT, PHELPS & PHILLIPS, LLP 

By: /s/ Eugene L. Hahm . 

 Eugene L. Hahm 

Attorneys for Defendant and 

Counterclaimant

VISTO CORPORATION 

DATED: March 3, 2008 KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP 

By: /s/ Philip T. Chen 

 Philip T. Chen 

Attorneys for Plaintiff and 

Counterdefendants

RESEARCH IN MOTION LIMITED, and 

RESEARCH IN MOTION CORPORATION 

Filer’s Attestation: Pursuant to General Order No. 45, Section X(B) regarding signatures, 

Eugene Hahm hereby attests that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained.

Case 3:07-cv-03177-MMC Document 41 Filed 03/04/08 Page 3 of 4
MANATT, PHELPS &

PHILLIPS, LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

PALO ALTO

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

MODIFYING PATENT RULE 4-3 SCHEDULE 

ORDER

Good cause appearing, the parties’ stipulation is hereby GRANTED. The deadlines for 

compliance with Patent L.R. 4-3 as set forth in the stipulation are modified as follows: 

Joint Claim Construction and Prehearing 

Statement under Patent L.R. 4-3 

March 17, 2008 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED this _____ day of March, 2008 

_______________________________

HON. MAXINE M. CHESNEY 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

20197723.1

4th

Case 3:07-cv-03177-MMC Document 41 Filed 03/04/08 Page 4 of 4