Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-00103/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-00103-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
Defendant
Hadar Meiri
Plaintiff

Document Text:

LA #4820-2211-3838 v1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

 

HADAR MEIRI, , CASE NO. 16-cv-00103-JST 

 Plaintiff(s), 

 

 v. STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS 

HARTFORD LIFE AND ACCIDENT 

INSURANCE COMPANY COMPANY , 

 Defendant(s). 

_______________________________/ 

 

 Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the 

following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5: 

The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process: 

 Court Processes:

☐ Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4) 

☐ Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5) 

☐ Mediation (ADR L.R. 6) 

(Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is 

appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any other form of ADR must participate in an 

ADR phone conference and may not file this form. They must instead file a Notice of Need for 

ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5) 

 Private Process:

☒ Private ADR (please identify process and provider) The parties have agreed to 

private mediation. We have compiled a list of potential mediators and are 

currently assessing their availability. We will provide further information about 

the mediation in the Joint CMC Statement. 

 

The parties agree to hold the ADR session by: 

☐ the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the order 

referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered. ) 

 

☒ other requested deadline -- July 22, 2016 

Dated: March 16, 2016 /s/ Erin Pressman [as 

authorized on 3/16/16] 

 Attorney for Plaintiff 

Dated: March 16, 2016 /s/ Melissa M. Cowan

 Attorney for Defendant 

Case 3:16-cv-00103-JST Document 17 Filed 03/16/16 Page 1 of 2
LA #4820-2211-3838 v1 

CONTINUE TO FOLLOWING PAGE 

[PROPOSED] ORDER

☐ The parties’ stipulation is adopted and IT IS SO ORDERED. 

☐ The parties’ stipulation is modified as follows, and IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: March 16, 2016 __________________________________________ 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

When filing this document in ECF, please be sure to use the appropriate Docket 

Event, e.g., “Stipulation and Proposed Order Selecting Mediation.”

Rev. 12/11 

 Page 2 of 2 

X

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

APPROVED

 Judge Jon S. Tigar 

Case 3:16-cv-00103-JST Document 17 Filed 03/16/16 Page 2 of 2