Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_10-cv-00720/USCOURTS-cand-3_10-cv-00720-6/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Implicit Networks, Inc.
Plaintiff
Red Hat, Inc.
Defendant
VMware, Inc.
Defendant

Document Text:

STIPULATED JT MOT AND [PROP] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME

FOR VMWARE AND RED HAD TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

Case No. C 10-00720 SI

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Katherine K. Lutton (CA Bar No. 194971) 

lutton@fr.com

Shelley K. Mack (CA Bar No. 209596) 

mack@fr.com

Robert J. Kent (CA Bar No. 250905) 

rjkent@fr.com

FISH & RICHARDSON P.C. 

500 Arguello Street, Suite 500 

Redwood City, California 94063-1526 

Telephone: (650) 839-5070 

Facsimile: (650) 839-5071 

Attorneys for Defendants 

VMWARE, INC. and RED HAT, INC. 

Spencer Hosie (CA Bar No. 101777) 

shosie@hosielaw.com

Bruce Wecker (CA Bar No. 078530) 

bwecker@hosielaw.com

George F. Bishop (CA Bar No. 89205) 

gbishop@hosielaw.com

HOSIE RICE LLP 

188 The Embarcadero, Suite 750 

San Francisco, California 94105 

Telephone: (415) 247-6000 

Facsimile: (415) 247-6001 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

IMPLICIT NETWORKS, INC. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

(SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION) 

IMPLICIT NETWORKS, INC. 

 Plaintiff, 

v.

VMWARE, INC. and RED HAT, INC., 

 Defendants. 

Case No. C 10-00720 SI 

STIPULATED JOINT MOTION AND 

[PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND THE 

TIME FOR DEFENDANTS VMWARE, 

INC. AND RED HAT, INC. TO RESPOND 

TO PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT 

/ / / 

/ / / 

/ / / 

Case 3:10-cv-00720-SI Document 46 Filed 07/30/10 Page 1 of 5
2 STIPULATED JT MOT AND [PROP] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME

FOR VMWARE AND RED HAD TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT.

Case No. C 10-00720 SI

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

TO THE COURT AND ALL PARTIES OF RECORD: 

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Plaintiff Implicit Networks, Inc. (“Plaintiff”) and 

Defendants VMware, Inc. (“VMware”) and Red Hat, Inc. (“Red Hat”) file this Stipulated Joint 

Motion and Proposed Order to Extend the Time for Defendants VMware, Inc. and Red Hat, Inc. to 

Respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint. 

The parties to this action are currently reviewing matters relevant to a possible resolution 

of this matter and also have a mutual interest in the orderly and efficient conduct of this litigation.

They agree that this extension of time will assist the parties in either resolving this dispute or in 

formulating their pleadings and responses in the present action. Having thus met and conferred on 

the issue, the parties hereby stipulate that the deadline for VMware and Red Hat to answer or 

otherwise respond to Plaintiff’s complaint should be extended 30 days until August 30, 2010, and 

also move the court to order that this deadline be extended to August 30, 2010. 

Dated: July 28, 2010 FISH & RICHARDSON P.C. 

By: /s/ Shelley K. Mack 

Shelley K. Mack 

Attorney for Defendants 

VMWARE, INC. and RED HAT, INC. 

Dated: July 28, 2010 HOSIE RICE LLP 

By: /s/ Spencer Hosie 

Spencer Hosie 

Attorney for Plaintiff 

IMPLICIT NETWORKS, INC. 

/ / / 

/ / / 

/ / / 

Case 3:10-cv-00720-SI Document 46 Filed 07/30/10 Page 2 of 5
3 STIPULATED JT MOT AND [PROP] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME

FOR VMWARE AND RED HAD TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT.

Case No. C 10-00720 SI

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DECLARATION

Pursuant to General Order No. 45, Section X(B) regarding signatures, I attest under 

penalty of perjury that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from George 

Bishop.

Dated: July 28, 2010 FISH & RICHARDSON P.C. 

By: /s/ Shelley K. Mack 

Shelley K. Mack 

Attorney for Defendants 

VMWARE, INC. and RED HAT, INC. 

stip EOT to answer.doc 

Case 3:10-cv-00720-SI Document 46 Filed 07/30/10 Page 3 of 5
4 STIPULATED JT MOT AND [PROP] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME

FOR VMWARE AND RED HAD TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT.

Case No. C 10-00720 SI

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Pursuant to stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED that Defendants VMware, Inc.’s and Red 

Hat, Inc.’s answer or other response to Implicit Network’s complaint shall be due on Augustly 30, 

2010.

Dated: ________________, 2010. 

Honorable Susan Illston 

United States District Court Judge 

stip EOT to answer.doc 

Case 3:10-cv-00720-SI Document 46 Filed 07/30/10 Page 4 of 5
5 STIPULATED JT MOT AND [PROP] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME

FOR VMWARE AND RED HAD TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

Case No. C 10-00720 SI

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned hereby certifies that on July 28, 2010, all counsel of record who are 

deemed to have consented to electronic service are being served with a copy of the 

STIPULATED JOINT MOTION TO EXTEND THE TIME FOR DEFENDANTS 

VMWARE, INC. AND RED HAD, INC. TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT

via the Court’s CM/ECF system per Local Rule 5-4 and General Order 45. Any other counsel of 

record will be served by first class mail. 

/s/ Shelley K. Mack 

 Tamara Fraizer

stip EOT to answer.doc 

Case 3:10-cv-00720-SI Document 46 Filed 07/30/10 Page 5 of 5