Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-01559/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-01559-35/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Boeing Company
Counter Claimant
City of Fresno
Counter Defendant
National Guard Bureau
Counter Claimant
United States Army Corps of Engineers
Counter Claimant
United States of America
Counter Claimant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

FRANCIS M. GOLDSBERRY II, SBN: 63737

FRANCIS M. GOLDSBERRY III, SBN: 178739

GOLDSBERRY, FREEMAN & GUZMAN, LLP

777 12th Street, Suite 250

Sacramento, CA 95814

Telephone: (916) 448-0448

Facsimile: (916) 448-8628

Attorneys for Defendant

THE BOEING COMPANY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

THE CITY OF FRESNO,

Plaintiff,

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; UNITED

STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS;

NATIONAL GUARD BUREAU; THE

BOEING COMPANY,

Defendants.

______________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No.: 1:06-CV-01559-OWW-GSA

ORDER ON BOEING COMPANY’S

MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

OR, ALTERNATIVELY, SUMMARY

ADJUDICATION OF PLAINTIFF’S RCRA

CAUSE OF ACTION

On June 14, 2010, the Boeing Company’s (“Boeing”) Motion for Summary Judgement, or,

Alternatively, Summary Adjudication of Plaintiff’s RCRA Cause of Action was heard by the Court. 

Lisa A. Decker, Jessica E. Yates, and Jeffrey L. Willis appeared for plaintiff the City of Fresno (the

“City”). Francis M. Goldsberry II and Francis M. Goldsberry III appeared for Boeing. 

After considering all papers filed in connection with Boeing’s motion and after hearing oral

argument, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED as follows: 

1. Boeing’s motion for summary judgment of plaintiff’s RCRA cause of action is

GRANTED for the reasons set forth in this Court’s Memorandum Decision dated

June 30, 2010 (Docket No. 322). Plaintiff’s claim against Boeing under RCRA, as

alleged in the Fourth Claim for Relief of the Second Amended Complaint, is hereby

DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

ORDER ON BOEING’S MOTION FOR 

SUMMARY ADJUDICATION RE STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS

CASE NO.: 1:06-CV-01559-OWW-GSA

Case 1:06-cv-01559-OWW -GSA Document 326 Filed 07/02/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IT IS SO ORDERED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 2, 2010 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger 

emm0d6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

ORDER ON BOEING’S MOTION FOR 

SUMMARY ADJUDICATION RE STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS

CASE NO.: 1:06-CV-01559-OWW-GSA - 2 -

Case 1:06-cv-01559-OWW -GSA Document 326 Filed 07/02/10 Page 2 of 2