Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_09-cv-00753/USCOURTS-caed-1_09-cv-00753-5/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Linda Barlow
Counter Claimant
Board of Supervisors of the County of Madera
Defendant
Judy Castles
Counter Defendant
County of Madera
Defendant
David Herman
Defendant
Gerald Houston
Counter Claimant
Shawn Huston
Defendant
David Prentice
Defendant
Mark Stamas
Counter Defendant

Document Text:

Stipulation to Extend Time to Respond to Second Amended Complaint and Order Page 1 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Andrew W. Sorensen, No. 078266 

Ryan D. Libke, No. 193742 

Attorneys for Defendants, COUNTY OF MADERA and BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF 

THE COUNTY OF MADERA 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

MARK STAMAS and JUDY CASTLES, 

 Plaintiffs, 

vs. 

COUNTY OF MADERA; BOARD OF 

SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF 

MADERA; DAVID HERMAN, an individual; 

SHAWN HUSTON, an individual; DAVID 

PRENTICE, an individual; GERALD 

HOUSTON and LINDA BARLOW, husband 

and wife; and DOES 1-100, inclusive, 

 Defendants. 

Case No.: 1:09-CV-00753-LJO-SMS 

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO 

RESPOND TO SECOND AMENDED 

COMPLAINT AND ORDER 

COMPLAINT FILED: May 27, 2009 

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto, through their 

respective attorneys of record, that due to the complexity of the Second Amended 

Complaint filed in this matter, the time for Defendants, COUNTY OF MADERA and BOARD 

OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF MADERA to respond be continued 14 days, to 

and including March 5, 2010. 

DATED: February 11, 2010 GRISWOLD, LaSALLE, COBB, 

DOWD & GIN, LLP 

 By /s/ Robert M. Dowd 

Robert M. Dowd 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs, 

MARK STAMAS and JUDY CASTLES 

LAW OFFICES OF 

EMERSON, COREY, SORENSEN, 

CHURCH & LIBKE 

2520 WEST SHAW LANE, SUITE 102 

FRESNO, CALIFORNIA 93711-2765 

Telephone: (559) 432-7641 

Facsimile: (559) 432-7639

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 1:09-cv-00753-LJO -JLT Document 64 Filed 03/02/10 Page 1 of 2
Stipulation to Extend Time to Respond to Second Amended Complaint and Order Page 2 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DATED: February 11, 2010 EMERSON, COREY, SORENSEN, 

 CHURCH & LIBKE 

 By /s/ Andrew W. Sorensen 

Andrew W. Sorensen 

Attorneys for Defendants, 

COUNTY OF MADERA and 

BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE 

COUNTY OF MADERA 

ORDER 

On the stipulation and agreement of the parties through their attorneys of record and 

good cause appearing therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the time for Defendants, COUNTY 

OF MADERA and BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF MADERA to 

respond be continued 14 days, to and including March 5, 2010. 

The Court hereby continues the Scheduling Conference hearing from March 15, 2010 to 

April 19, 2010 at 10:30 a.m. before Judge Snyder in Courtroom #7. 

IT IS FURTHERED ORDERED THAT document #61 has response date due as July 1, 2009 

is STRICKEN, since parties resubmitted the document in entry #62. 

Dated: March 2, 2010 /s/ Sandra M. Snyder_____________ 

 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 1:09-cv-00753-LJO -JLT Document 64 Filed 03/02/10 Page 2 of 2