Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-00554/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-00554-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Commissioner of Social Security
Defendant
Carole Henry
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CAROLE HENRY, )

)

Plaintiff, )

v. )

)

MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, )

Commissioner of Social )

Security, )

)

Defendant. )

)

 )

1:06-cv-00554-AWI-SMS

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATION RE: PLAINTIFF’S

SOCIAL SECURITY COMPLAINT (DOCS.

2, 29)

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S SOCIAL

SECURITY COMPLAINT (DOC. 2)

ORDER DIRECTING THE ENTRY OF

JUDGMENT FOR DEFENDANT MICHAEL J.

ASTRUE AND AGAINST PLAINTIFF

CAROLE HENRY

Plaintiff is represented by counsel and seeks judicial

review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security

(Commissioner) denying an application for disability benefits.

The matter was referred to the Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28

U.S.C.§ 636(b) and Local Rule 72-302(c)(15).

On January 24, 2008, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and

a recommendation that the Plaintiff’s social security complaint

be denied and that the Clerk be directed to enter judgment for

Defendant Michael J. Astrue and against Plaintiff Carole Henry. 

Case 1:06-cv-00554-AWI -SMS Document 30 Filed 03/03/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

The findings and recommendation were served on all parties on

January 24, 2008, and contained notice that any objections to the

findings and recommendations were to be filed within thirty (30)

days of the date of service of the order. No party filed any

objections. 

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636

(b)(1)(C) and Britt v. Simi Valley United School Dist., 708 F.2d

452, 454 (9 Cir. 1983), this Court has conducted a de novo th

review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file,

the Court finds that the findings and recommendation are

supported by the record and proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendation filed January 24, 2008,

are ADOPTED IN FULL; and

2. The Plaintiff’s social security complaint IS DENIED; and

3. The Clerk of Court IS DIRECTED to enter judgment for

Defendant Michael J. Astrue and against Plaintiff Carole Henry.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 28, 2008 /s/ Anthony W. Ishii 

0m8i78 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-00554-AWI -SMS Document 30 Filed 03/03/08 Page 2 of 2