Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-alnd-7_04-cv-00527/USCOURTS-alnd-7_04-cv-00527-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Samuel Lavonne Hamilton
Plaintiff
Barbara Patton
Defendant
Phone Supervisor
Defendant
Sheryl Price
Defendant

Document Text:

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

WESTERN DIVISION

SAMUEL LAVONNE HAMILTON,

Plaintiff,

v.

SHERYL PRICE; BARBARA

PATTON; PHONE SUPERVISOR,

Jane Doe,

Defendants.

}

}

}

}

}

}

}

}

}

}

} 

Case No.: 7:04-CV-527-RDP-PWG

MEMORANDUM OF OPINION

After conducting an evidentiary hearing in the above-styled case, the magistrate judge filed

a report and recommendation on August 19, 2005, recommending that Defendants’ Motion for

Summary Judgment be granted and this case be dismissed with prejudice. The parties were allowed

fifteen days to file objections to the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation. Plaintiff filed

objections on August 30, 2005.

Having carefully reviewed and considered de novo all the materials in the court file, including

the report and recommendation and Plaintiff’s objections thereto, the court is of the opinion that the

magistrate judge’s report is due to be and hereby is ADOPTED and his recommendation is

ACCEPTED. The court EXPRESSLY FINDS that there are no genuine issues of material fact and

that Defendants are entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Accordingly, Defendants’ Motion for

Summary Judgment is GRANTED and this action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. A Final

Judgment will be entered.

DONE and ORDERED this 31st day of August, 2005.

___________________________________

R. DAVID PROCTOR

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

FILED

 2005 Aug-31 PM 12:54

U.S. DISTRICT COURT

N.D. OF ALABAMA

Case 7:04-cv-00527-RDP-PWG Document 42 Filed 08/31/05 Page 1 of 1