Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-01428/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-01428-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Heidi Dorr
Plaintiff
Yahoo! Inc.
Defendant

Document Text:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

 CASE NO.

Plaintiff(s), 

 

v. STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]

ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS 

Defendant(s).

_______________________________/

Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the

following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5: 

The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process: 

Court Processes:

9 Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4)

9 Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5)

9 Mediation (ADR L.R. 6)

(Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is

appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any other form of ADR, must participate in an

ADR phone conference and may not file this form. They must instead file a Notice of Need for

ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5) 

Private Process:

9 Private ADR (please identify process and provider) ______________________

_____________________________________________________________________________

The parties agree to hold the ADR session by: 

9 the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the order

referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered. ) 

9 other requested deadline _____________________________________________

Dated:___________ ____________________________

Attorney for Plaintiff

Dated:____________ ____________________________

Attorney for Defendant

YAHOO! INC., HEIDI DORR, Individually and On Behalf of 

All Others Similarly Situated,

Mediation. Clear Form ✔

✔ Parties will confer regarding scheduling of mediation. 07-1428 06/05/07 06/05/07 Willem F. Jonckheer /s/ Kirsten Daru /s/

Case 3:07-cv-01428-WHA Document 11 Filed 06/07/07 Page 1 of 2
[PROPOSED] ORDER

Pursuant to the Stipulation above, the captioned matter is hereby referred to: 

9 Non-binding Arbitration 

9 Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE)

9 Mediation

9 Private ADR 

Deadline for ADR session

9 90 days from the date of this order.

9 other ___________________

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated:________________ ___________________________________

UNITED STATES JUDGE

When filing this document in ECF, please be sure to use the appropriate ADR Docket 

Event, e.g., "Stipulation and Proposed Order Selecting Early Neutral Evaluation."

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Martin J. Jenkins

Dated: 6/6/07 150 DAYS FROM THE DATE OF THE ORDER. ✔

✔

MAGISTRATE

Case 3:07-cv-01428-WHA Document 11 Filed 06/07/07 Page 2 of 2