Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-09-08210/USCOURTS-ca4-09-08210-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
United States of America
Appellee
Jason Allen Woody
Appellant

Document Text:

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-8210

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

JASON ALLEN WOODY,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern 

District of West Virginia, at Beckley. Thomas E. Johnston, 

District Judge. (5:06-cr-00040-1)

Submitted: February 18, 2010 Decided: February 26, 2010

Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jason Allen Woody, Appellant Pro Se. John Lanier File, John J. 

Frail, Assistant United States Attorneys, Charleston, West 

Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 09-8210 Doc: 7 Filed: 02/26/2010 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Jason Allen Woody appeals the district court’s orders

denying his motion for a reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 

U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006), and his motion for reconsideration of 

the denial of his § 3582(c) motion. We have reviewed the record 

and find no abuse of the district court’s discretion. See

United States v. Goines, 357 F.3d 469, 478 (4th Cir. 2004) 

(standard). Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by 

the district court. United States v. Woody, No. 5:06-cr-00040-1

(S.D.W. Va. Nov. 17, 2009; Dec. 1, 2009). We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before the court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Appeal: 09-8210 Doc: 7 Filed: 02/26/2010 Pg: 2 of 2