Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_14-cv-02006/USCOURTS-caed-1_14-cv-02006-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
California Pride, Inc.
Defendant
Cedar & Ashlan Buggy Clean
Defendant
Lawrence Green
Plaintiff

Document Text:

STIPULATION GRANTING PLAINTIFF LEAVE TO FILE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT; 

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

Page 1 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Tanya E. Moore, SBN 206683 

MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C. 

332 North Second Street 

San Jose, California 95112 

Telephone (408) 298-2000 

Facsimile (408) 298-6046 

Email: tanya@moorelawfirm.com 

Attorney for Plaintiff 

Lawrence Green 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

LAWRENCE GREEN, 

 Plaintiff, 

 vs. 

CALIFORNIA PRIDE, INC., dba CEDAR & 

ASHLAN BUGGY CLEAN, et al. 

 Defendant. 

)

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

)

No. 1:14-cv-02006-JAM-EPG 

STIPULATION GRANTING PLAINTIFF 

LEAVE TO FILE FIRST AMENDED 

COMPLAINT; ORDER 

 

WHEREAS, Plaintiff, Lawrence Green (“Plaintiff”), seeks to amend his complaint to 

allege additional barriers relating to his disability which were identified at the site inspection of 

the subject property conducted on May 8, 2015, as permitted by Chapman v. Pier 1 Imports 

(U.S.), Inc., 631 F.3d 939, 944 (9th Cir. 2011), and required by Oliver v. Ralphs Grocery Co., 

654 F.3d 903, 909 (9th Cir. 2011); 

WHEREAS, Plaintiff has not unduly delayed the amendment, does not bring it in bad 

faith, the amendment is not futile, and such amendment does not prejudice Defendant, 

California Pride, Inc., dba Cedar & Ashlan Buggy Clean (“Defendant,” and together with 

Plaintiff, the “Parties”), nor does the amendment in any way change the nature of the action; 

// 

Case 1:14-cv-02006-DAD-EPG Document 22 Filed 10/27/15 Page 1 of 3
STIPULATION GRANTING PLAINTIFF LEAVE TO FILE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT; 

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

Page 2 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WHEREAS, the amendment will not modify any date or deadline fixed by the Court’s 

First Amended Status (Pre-trial Scheduling) Order dated August 10, 2015 (Dkt. 19) pursuant to 

Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b)(4); 

 NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the Parties, 

through their respective attorneys of record, that Plaintiff may file a First Amended Complaint, 

a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit “A.”

IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED that Plaintiff will file his First Amended Complaint 

within five (5) calendar days of the Court’s Order permitting such filing, and that Defendant’s 

response thereto shall be filed within fourteen (14) days after the First Amended Complaint is 

filed. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

Dated: October 23, 2015 MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C. 

 /s/ Tanya E. Moore 

 Tanya E. Moore 

 Attorney for Plaintiff, 

 Lawrence Green 

Dated: October 23, 2015 WALTER & WILHELM LAW GROUP, 

 a Professional Corporation 

 /s/ Mary Lerner 

 Mary Lerner 

 Attorneys for Defendant, 

 California Pride, Inc., 

 dba Cedar & Ashlan Buggy Clean 

 

Case 1:14-cv-02006-DAD-EPG Document 22 Filed 10/27/15 Page 2 of 3
STIPULATION GRANTING PLAINTIFF LEAVE TO FILE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT; 

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

Page 3 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER 

 The Parties having so stipulated and good cause appearing, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff shall file his First Amended Complaint, a 

copy of which was filed with the Parties’ stipulation, within five (5) calendar days of the date 

this Order is filed. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant’s response thereto shall be filed within 

fourteen (14) days after the First Amended Complaint is filed. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: 10/26/2015 /s/ John A. Mendez____________ 

 United States District Court Judge 

Case 1:14-cv-02006-DAD-EPG Document 22 Filed 10/27/15 Page 3 of 3