Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_19-cv-01314/USCOURTS-caed-1_19-cv-01314-3/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Miguel Calderon
Plaintiff
Ensign United States Drilling (California) Inc.
Defendant
Louis Newell
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

30

31

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

30

31

1

Order on Stipulation to Amend Complaint

Daniel J. Palay, SBN 159348

Brian D. Hefelfinger, SBN 253054

PALAY HEFELFINGER, APC

1746 S. Victoria Ave., Suite 230

Ventura, CA 93003

Telephone: (805) 628-8220

Facsimile: (805) 765-8600

E-mail: bdh@calemploymentcounsel.com

Attorneys for Plaintiffs and the Putative Class

David J. Cooper, SBN 47615

Vanessa Franco Chavez, SBN 266724

KLEIN, DENATALE, GOLDNER,

COOPER, ROSENLIEB & KIMBALL, LLP

4550 California Ave., Second Floor

Bakersfield, CA 93309

Telephone: 661-395-1000

Facsimile: 661-326-0418

Email: dcooper@kleinlaw.com

vchavez@kleinlaw.com

Attorneys for Defendant

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, FRESNO DIVISION 

LOUIS NEWELL, an individual, for himself 

and those similarly situated; MIGUEL 

CALDERON, an individual, for himself and 

those similarly situated,

Plaintiffs,

v.

ENSIGN UNITED STATES DRILLING 

(CALIFORNIA) INC., a California 

corporation; and DOES 1 through 100, 

inclusive,

Defendants.

Case No.: 1:19-CV-01314-LJO-JLT

CLASS ACTION 

[PROPOSED] ORDER TO FILE THIRD 

AMENDED COMPLAINT

(Doc. 13)

Based upon the parties’ stipulation, and good cause appearing, the Court ORDERS: 

1. Plaintiff is granted leave to file a third amended complaint with the Court within 

Case 1:19-cv-01314-JLT-CDB Document 14 Filed 01/29/20 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

30

31

2

Stipulation to Amend Complaint; [Proposed] Order

three court days;

2. Defendant shall file its responsive pleading no later than 30 from the filing of the 

third amended complaint.

1

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 28, 2020 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

 

1 The Court declines to address the other points raised in the stipulation as they appear to be an agreement between 

the parties, which does not require the Court’s order. Also, the Court declines to make a finding as to the plaintiff’s 

reasons for amending the complaint because it lacks the evidence for doing so.

Case 1:19-cv-01314-JLT-CDB Document 14 Filed 01/29/20 Page 2 of 2