Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_22-cv-00574/USCOURTS-caed-1_22-cv-00574-2/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Airport Grocery
Defendant
Darren Gilbert
Plaintiff
Mustafa Kaid Ali Mane
Defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DARREN GILBERT,

Plaintiff,

v.

MUSTAFA KAID ALI MANE dba Airport 

Grocery,

Defendant.

No. 1:22-cv-00574-ADA-SKO

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND 

RECOMMENDATIONS AND DECLINING 

SUPPLEMENTAL JURISDICTION OVER

STATE LAW CLAIMS

(ECF No. 15)

Plaintiff Darren Gilbert (“Plaintiff”) initiated this action on May 12, 2022, asserting a claim 

for injunctive relief arising out of an alleged violation of the federal Americans with Disabilities 

Act (“ADA”) and a claim for damages pursuant to California’s Unruh Act. (ECF No. 1.) The 

matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and 

Local Rule 302. 

Following an order to show cause, (ECF No. 13), on April 14, 2023, the assigned Magistrate 

Judge issued findings and recommendations, recommending that the Court decline to exercise 

supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiff’s state law claims and that those claims be dismissed, 

without prejudice, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c)(4). (ECF No. 15.) The findings and 

recommendations were served on Plaintiff and contained notice that any objections thereto were to 

be filed within fourteen days after service. (Id. at 7.) No objections have been filed, and the time 

///

Case 1:22-cv-00574-TLN-AC Document 17 Filed 06/07/23 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

in which to do so has passed.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(c), this Court has conducted a 

de novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds that the 

findings and recommendations are supported by the record and proper analysis.

Accordingly,

1. The findings and recommendations issued on April 14, 2023, (ECF No. 15), are 

ADOPTED in full; 

2. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c)(4) and Vo v. Choi, 49 F.4th 1167 (9th Cir. 2022), 

the Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiff’s Unruh Act 

claim and Plaintiff’s Cal. Health & Safety Code §§ 19955 and 19959 claims; 

3. Plaintiff’s Unruh Act and Cal. Health & Safety Code §§ 19955 and 19959 claims

are DISMISSED, without prejudice, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c)(4); and

4. This matter is referred back to the assigned Magistrate Judge for further 

proceedings.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 6, 2023 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:22-cv-00574-TLN-AC Document 17 Filed 06/07/23 Page 2 of 2