Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-10-06612/USCOURTS-ca4-10-06612-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Norman Tyrone Dais
Appellant
United States of America
Appellee

Document Text:

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-6612

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

NORMAN TYRONE DAIS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Florence. Terry L. Wooten, District Judge. 

(4:03-cv-00386-TLW-1)

Submitted: July 22, 2010 Decided: August 3, 2010

Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Norman Tyrone Dais, Appellant Pro Se. Rose Mary Sheppard 

Parham, Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South 

Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 10-6612 Doc: 16 Filed: 08/03/2010 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Norman Tyrone Dais appeals the district court’s order 

denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)(3) motion based on allegations 

of fraud, misrepresentation and misconduct. We have reviewed 

the record and find Dais did not establish misconduct by clear 

and convincing evidence or show that he was prevented from 

presenting his case. See Schultz v. Butcher, 24 F.3d 626, 630 

(4th Cir. 1994). Accordingly, we find the court did not abuse 

its discretion denying the motion. Id. We affirm the court’s 

order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

AFFIRMED

Appeal: 10-6612 Doc: 16 Filed: 08/03/2010 Pg: 2 of 2