Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_18-cv-06495/USCOURTS-cand-4_18-cv-06495-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
George Jaime
Respondent
Devin Lee James Schmidt
Petitioner

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DEVIN LEE JAMES SCHMIDT,

Petitioner,

v.

GEORGE JAIME, Warden,

Respondent.

Case No. 18-cv-06495-YGR (PR) 

ORDER GRANTING REQUEST FOR 

EXTENSION OF TIME FOR 

PETITIONER TO FILE OPPOSITION 

TO MOTION TO DISMISS

Before the Court is a motion filed by Petitioner on June 3, 2019, in which he “move[s] for 

a motion to continue despite [the] court[’]s unprejudicial dismissal for untimeliness.” Dkt. 10 at 

1. The Court notes that the instant action has not been dismissed, and instead Respondent has

filed a motion to dismiss. See Dkt. 7. While not entirely clear, it seems that Petitioner is 

requesting an extension of time to file his opposition to the pending motion to dismiss. Therefore, 

the Court construes his motion to be a request for an extension of time to file his opposition.

Having read and considered Petitioner’s request, and good cause appearing, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Petitioner’s request for an extension of time is 

GRANTED. Dkt. 10. The time in which Petitioner may file his opposition to Respondent’s 

motion to dismiss will be extended up to and including twenty-eight (28) days from the date of 

this Order.

Respondent shall file a reply brief no later than fourteen (14) days after the date 

Petitioner’s opposition is filed.

This Order terminates Docket No. 10.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: ______________________________________

YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS

United States District Court Judge

June 25, 2019

Case 4:18-cv-06495-YGR Document 11 Filed 06/25/19 Page 1 of 1