Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-06459/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-06459-2/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Albert Dytch
Plaintiff
Alicia Guzman
Defendant
Enrique Alejandro Guzman
Defendant
Luz Maria Guzman
Defendant
Los Dos Hermanos
Defendant

Document Text:

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE; [PROPOSED] ORDER

Page 1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Tanya E. Moore, SBN 206683

MISSION LAW FIRM, A.P.C.

332 North Second Street

San Jose, California 95112

Telephone (408) 298-2000

Facsimile (408) 298-6046

Email: service@mission.legal

Attorneys for Plaintiff

Albert Dytch

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ALBERT DYTCH,

Plaintiff,

vs.

ENRIQUE ALEJANDRO GUZMAN dba 

LOS DOS HERMANOS, et al.,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. 3:16-cv-06459-MMC

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF 

ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE; 

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Case 3:16-cv-06459-MMC Document 16 Filed 02/28/17 Page 1 of 3
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE; [PROPOSED] ORDER

Page 2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff Albert Dytch and Defendants

Enrique Alejandro Guzman dba Los Dos Hermanos, Luz Maria Guzman dba Los Dos 

Hermanos, and Alicia Guzman, the parties to this action, by and through their respective 

counsel, that pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), the above-captioned 

action be dismissed without prejudice. 

IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED between Plaintiff and Defendants that the Parties have 

entered into a Stipulated Judgment, attached hereto as Exhibit “A,” which provides for 

judgment to be entered in Plaintiff’s favor in the event that Defendants default on their 

obligations under the Parties’ settlement agreement. The Parties request that the Court retain 

jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the Stipulated Judgment under the authority of Kokkonen v. 

Guardian Life Ins. Co. of America, 511 U.S. 375, 381-82 (1994).

Dated: February 27, 2017 MISSION LAW FIRM, A.P.C.

/s/ Tanya E. Moore

Tanya E. Moore 

Attorneys for Plaintiff,

Albert Dytch

Dated: February 27, 2017 GHANTOUS LAW CORPORATION

/s/ Karyne T. Ghantous

Karyne T. Ghantous

Attorneys for Defendants,

The Guzman Corporation dba La Pinata #1 and 

Alicia Guzman, Trustee of the Francisco Javier and 

Alicia Guzman Revocable Living Trust, dated 

August 5, 2004

Case 3:16-cv-06459-MMC Document 16 Filed 02/28/17 Page 2 of 3
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE; [PROPOSED] ORDER

Page 3

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

The parties having so stipulated,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. The Court 

will retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the Stipulated Judgment under the authority of 

Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of America, 511 U.S. 375, 381-82 (1994).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated:

United States District Judge

February 28, 2017

Case 3:16-cv-06459-MMC Document 16 Filed 02/28/17 Page 3 of 3