Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-03440/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-03440-2/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Danaher Corporation
Defendant
Entrenet Capital Partners, LLC
Plaintiff

Document Text:

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ENTRENET CAPITAL PARTNERS, LLC,

 Plaintiff,

 v.

 DANAHER CORPORATION,

Defendant. /

No. C05-03440 MJJ

ORDER REGARDING PROTECTIVE

ORDER

On August 23, 2006, the parties submitted a Proposed Stipulated Protective Order. The

Court hereby orders the parties to submit a revised protective order complying with the requirements

set forth below.

1) When defining what constitutes “Confidential Information,” add a provision which 

provides that the information sought to be protected is properly subject to protection 

under FRCP Rule 26(c) and that counsel shall not designate any discovery material 

“CONFIDENTIAL” without first making a good faith determination that protection is

warranted. 

2) Provide detailed instructions for filing confidential materials under seal. In addition 

to placing documents in a sealed envelope with instructions that the document is filed

pursuant to the Stipulated Protective Order and that the envelope is not to be opened 

absent further order of the court, the envelope should be labeled to identify the title 

Case 3:05-cv-03440-MJJ Document 16 Filed 09/15/06 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

of the case, the case number, and the title of the document.

3) Add a provision which provides adequate means for challenging a confidentiality 

designation.

4) Add a provision placing the burden of proof on the party seeking protection to show 

that such protection is warranted.

5) Designate a time limit on the Court’s jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the order. 

(e.g., six months after final termination of the action).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: 9/15/2006 

MARTIN J. JENKINS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:05-cv-03440-MJJ Document 16 Filed 09/15/06 Page 2 of 2