Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cr-00555/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cr-00555-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Ricardo Manzo-Rangel
Defendant
Armando Reyes-Cornejo
Defendant
Gabriela Solis
Defendant
USA
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER

CR 05 00555 CRB

KEVIN V. RYAN (CSBN 118321)

United States Attorney

EUMI L. CHOI (WVBN 0722)

Chief, Criminal Division

SUSAN R. JERICH (CSBN 188462)

Assistant United States Attorney

450 Golden Gate Avenue, Box 36055

San Francisco, California 94102

Telephone: (415) 436-7158

Facsimile: (415) 436-7234

Email: susan.jerich@usdoj.gov

Attorneys for Plaintiff

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) No.: CR 05-00555 CRB

)

Plaintiff, ) PARTIES’ STIPULATION AND

) PROPOSED ORDER EXCLUDING

v. ) TIME UNDER SPEEDY TRIAL ACT

)

RICARDO MANZO-RANGEL, )

ARMANDO REYES-CORNEJO, and )

GABRIELA SOLIS )

)

Defendant. )

____________________________________)

The parties stipulate and agree, and the Court finds and holds, as follows:

1. The parties initially appeared before the Honorable Charles R. Breyer on August 31, 2005. 

The matter was continued until October 12, 2005 for status.

2. The government indicated that discovery was still being produced. Defense counsel stated

that they required additional time to receive and review discovery and to effectively prepare the

case. Counsel requested an exclusion of time on this basis.

3. In light of the foregoing facts, the failure to grant the requested exclusion would

unreasonably deny the defendants effective preparation of counsel as well as continuity of

counsel. See 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(A), (B)(iv). The ends of justice would be served by the

Case 3:05-cr-00555-CRB Document 23 Filed 10/04/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER

CR 05-00555 CRB 2

Court excluding the proposed time period. These ends outweigh the best interest of the public

and the defendant in a speedy trial. See id. § 3161(h)(8)(A).

4. For the reasons stated, the time period from August 31, 2005 through October 12, 2005,

hall be excluded from the calculation of time under the Speedy Trial Act.

SO STIPULATED.

DATED: 9/12/05 Respectfully Submitted,

_________/s/_____________________

SUSAN R. JERICH

Assistant United States Attorney

________/s/_______________________

DATED: 9/14/05 ELIZABETH M. FALK

Counsel for Defendant Gabriela Solis

DATED: 9/14/05 ________/s/________________________

GLENN K. OSAJIMA

Counsel for Defendant Armando Reyes Cornejo

DATED: 9/20/05 ________/s/_________________________

MICHAEL STEPANIAN

Counsel for Defendant Ricardo Manzo-Rangel

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: __________________________________

HON. CHARLES R. BREYER

United States District Court Judge

October 3, 2005

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

APPROVED

Judge Charles R. Breyer

Case 3:05-cr-00555-CRB Document 23 Filed 10/04/05 Page 2 of 2