Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_21-cv-01343/USCOURTS-caed-1_21-cv-01343-6/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Frank Monaco Bazzo
Plaintiff
Bobbola
Defendant
S. Gates
Defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

FRANK MONACO BAZZO,

Plaintiff,

v.

S. GATES, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 1:21-cv-01343-ADA-CDB (PC) 

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND 

RECOMMENDATIONS TO DISMISS 

CERTAIN CLAIMS

 (ECF No. 27)

Plaintiff Frank Monaco Bazzo (“Plaintiff”) is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in 

this civil rights action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This matter was referred to a United 

States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On April 10, 2023, the assigned Magistrate Judge issued findings and recommendations, 

recommending that this action proceed on the Eighth Amendment conditions of confinement and 

deliberate indifference to serious medical needs claims against Defendants Gates and Bobbola, and 

unknown Does 1 through 5, as alleged in Plaintiff’s first amended complaint. (ECF No. 27.) The 

Magistrate Judge further recommended that the remaining claims in Plaintiff’s first amended 

complaint be dismissed. (Id.) The Magistrate Judge provided Plaintiff fourteen days within which 

to file any objections to the findings and recommendations. (Id.) No objections have been filed. 

//

//

Case 1:21-cv-01343-KES-CDB Document 28 Filed 06/30/23 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a 

de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the file, the Court finds the findings and 

recommendations to be supported by the record and proper analysis.

Accordingly,

1. The findings and recommendations issued on April 10, 2023, (ECF No. 27), are adopted

in full;

2. This action shall proceed on Plaintiff’s Eighth Amendment conditions of confinement 

and deliberate indifference to serious medical needs claims against Defendants Gates 

and Bobbola, and unknown Does 1 through 5, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983;

3. The remaining claims in Plaintiff’s first amended complaint are dismissed; and

4. The matter is referred back to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 30, 2023 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:21-cv-01343-KES-CDB Document 28 Filed 06/30/23 Page 2 of 2