Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-15-01241/USCOURTS-ca4-15-01241-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Mark Douglas Brooks
Appellant
Dadma Lydia Diaz C
Appellee
Lawrence Hammond
Appellee
Regina M. Joe
Appellee
Kristy M. Newton
Appellee
Candace E. Siler
Appellee

Document Text:

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-1241

MARK DOUGLAS BROOKS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

DADMA LYDIA DIAZ C; JUDGE LAWRENCE HAMMOND; KRISTY M. NEWTON, 

DA; CANDACE E. SILER; JUDGE REGINA M. JOE,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle 

District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Thomas D. Schroeder, 

District Judge. (1:14-cv-00794-TDS-LPA)

Submitted: July 21, 2015 Decided: July 23, 2015

Before WILKINSON and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Mark Douglas Brooks, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 15-1241 Doc: 11 Filed: 07/23/2015 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Mark Douglas Brooks appeals the district court’s order 

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and 

dismissing his civil complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) 

(2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss 

the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Brooks 

v. Diaz C, No. 1:14-cv-00794-TDS-LPA (M.D.N.C. Feb. 19, 2015). We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions 

are adequately presented in the materials before this court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Appeal: 15-1241 Doc: 11 Filed: 07/23/2015 Pg: 2 of 2