Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca13-14-01599/USCOURTS-ca13-14-01599-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Kyocera Corporation
Appellee
Motorola Mobility LLC
Appellee
SoftView LLC
Appellant

Document Text:

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

SOFTVIEW LLC,

Appellant

v.

KYOCERA CORPORATION, MOTOROLA 

MOBILITY LLC,

Appellees

______________________ 

2014-1599

______________________ 

Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 

IPR2013-00004, IPR2013-00257.

______________________ 

JUDGMENT

______________________ 

MORGAN CHU, Irell & Manella LLP, Los Angeles, CA, 

argued for appellant. Also represented by SAMUEL KAI LU,

ALAN J. HEINRICH. 

 ERIC C. COHEN, Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP, 

Chicago, IL, argued for appellee Kyocera Corporation. 

Also represented by MICHAEL TOMSA, MICHAEL ADAM 

DORFMAN. 

Case: 14-1599 Document: 76-2 Page: 1 Filed: 02/09/2015
 

JOHN C. ALEMANNI, Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton 

LLP, Winston-Salem, NC, argued for appellee Motorola 

Mobility LLC. Also represented by ADAM HOWARD 

CHARNES; DAVID A. REED, CANDICE C. DECAIRE, ALYSON L.

WOOTEN, WILLIAM HENRY BOICE, Atlanta, GA;

CHRISTOPHER SCHENCK, Seattle, WA.

JOSEPH MATAL, Office of the Solicitor, United States 

Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for 

intervenor. Also represented by SCOTT WEIDENFELLER,

NATHAN K. KELLEY. 

______________________ 

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 

 PER CURIAM (WALLACH, TARANTO, and HUGHES, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

February 9, 2015 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole

 Date Daniel E. O’Toole 

 Clerk of Court

Case: 14-1599 Document: 76-2 Page: 2 Filed: 02/09/2015