Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-00964/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-00964-2/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Charles Barksdale
Petitioner
Ponce
Respondent

Document Text:

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

CHARLES BARKSDALE, 

Petitioner, 

v. 

PONCE, Warden, 

Respondent. 

No. 2:15-cv-0964 AC P (TEMP) 

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE 

 Petitioner is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se with an application for writ of habeas 

corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. On October 5, 2015, counsel for respondent filed a motion 

to dismiss. To date, petitioner has not filed an opposition to the motion. Local Rule 230(l) 

provides in part: “Failure of the responding party to file written opposition or to file a statement 

of no opposition may be deemed a waiver of any opposition to the granting of the motion . . . .” 

Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that within twenty-one days of the 

date of service of this order, petitioner shall show cause in writing why this court should not grant 

the pending motion to dismiss the petition. Petitioner is cautioned that failure to file an 

//// 

//// 

//// 

//// 

Case 2:15-cv-00964-JAM-AC Document 16 Filed 11/12/15 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2

opposition to the pending motion to dismiss or otherwise respond to this court’s order will result 

in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. 

DATED: November 12, 2015 

Case 2:15-cv-00964-JAM-AC Document 16 Filed 11/12/15 Page 2 of 2