Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca5-15-20241/USCOURTS-ca5-15-20241-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Athari Real Estate, Limited
Appellant
Hartford Lloyd's Insurance Company
Appellee
United Neurology, P.A.
Appellant

Document Text:

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-20241

UNITED NEUROLOGY, P.A.; ATHARI REAL ESTATE, LIMITED, 

 Plaintiffs - Appellants

v.

HARTFORD LLOYD'S INSURANCE COMPANY, doing business as The 

Hartford, 

 Defendant - Appellee

Appeals from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:10-CV-4248

Before JOLLY and JONES, Circuit Judges, and MILLS∗

, District Judge.

PER CURIAM:∗∗

The court has carefully considered all of the issues raised in this appeal 

in light of the briefs, oral argument, and pertinent portions of the record. 

Having done so, we find no reversible error of law or fact and affirm for 

essentially the reasons stated in the district court’s comprehensive opinion. 

In particular, there is insufficient evidence to create a genuine dispute as to 

 ∗ District Judge of the Northern District of Mississippi, sitting by designation.

∗∗ Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should 

not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 

5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

December 11, 2015

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 15-20241 Document: 00513304795 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/11/2015
No. 15-20241

2

whether the appraisal panel exceeded its authority by improperly allocating 

damages to “mitigation” rather than to the actual pre-existing condition of the 

properties. TMM Investments, Ltd. v. Ohio Cas. Ins. Co., 730 F.3d 466, 474-75 

(5th Cir. 2013). The court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

 Case: 15-20241 Document: 00513304795 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/11/2015