Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_08-cv-00001/USCOURTS-caed-1_08-cv-00001-7/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Joseph Campos
Plaintiff
City of Merced
Defendant
Merced Police Officer Jeffrey Horn
Defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DALE L. ALLEN, JR., # 145279

DIRK D. LARSEN, #246028

LOW, BALL & LYNCH

505 Montgomery Street, 7th Floor

San Francisco, California 94111-2584

Telephone (415) 981-6630

Facsimile (415) 982-1634

Email: dallen@lowball.com

Email: dlarsen@lowball.com

Attorneys for Defendants

CITY OF MERCED and 

MERCED POLICE OFFICER JEFFREY HORN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

FRESNO DIVISION 

JOSEPH CAMPOS,

Plaintiff,

vs.

CITY OF MERCED, MERCED POLICE OFFICER

JEFFREY HORN, and DOES 1 through 50,

inclusive, 

Defendants.

 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 1:08-CV-00001-GSA

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL

WITH PREJUDICE AND ORDER

1. Plaintiff JOSEPH CAMPOS and defendant CITY OF MERCED (collectively the

“Parties”) have entered into a Settlement Agreement and General Release in this matter whereby they

have resolved all claims and agreed to the dismissal of the above-captioned action with prejudice, each

party to bear their own attorney’s fees and costs.

///

///

///

///

///

///

-1-

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AND ORDER

 Case No. 1:08-CV-0001-GSA

Case 1:08-cv-00001-GSA Document 78 Filed 06/21/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2. Accordingly, the Parties jointly request the Court to dismiss this action with prejudice.

Dated: June 18, 2010.

LOW, BALL & LYNCH

 By s/ Dirk D. Larsen 

DALE L. ALLEN, JR.

DIRK D. LARSEN

Attorneys for Defendants

CITY OF MERCED and 

MERCED POLICE OFFICER JEFFREY HORN

Dated: June 18, 2010.

LAW OFFICE OF ERIC P. ESCAMILLA

 By s/ Eric P. Escamilla 

ERIC P. ESCAMILLA

Attorneys for Plaintiff

JOSEPH CAMPOS

ORDER

Having considered the Parties’ Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice and for good cause

appearing, it is hereby ORDERED:

1. That the above-captioned action, Campos v. City of Merced et al, Case No.

1:08-CV-00001-GSA, is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, each party to bear their own costs

and attorney’s fees.

 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: June 18, 2010 /s/ Gary S. Austin 

6i0kij UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

-2-

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AND ORDER

 Case No. 1:08-CV-0001-GSA

Case 1:08-cv-00001-GSA Document 78 Filed 06/21/10 Page 2 of 2