Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_10-cv-00720/USCOURTS-cand-3_10-cv-00720-4/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Implicit Networks, Inc.
Plaintiff
Red Hat, Inc.
Defendant
VMware, Inc.
Defendant

Document Text:

STIPULATED JT MOT AND [PROP] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME

FOR VMWARE AND RED HAD TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

Case No. C 10-00720 SI

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Katherine K. Lutton (CA Bar No. 194971)

lutton@fr.com

Tamara Fraizer (CA Bar No. 215942)

fraizer@fr.com

Robert J. Kent (CA Bar No. 250905)

rjkent@fr.com

FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.

500 Arguello Street, Suite 500

Redwood City, California 94063-1526

Telephone: (650) 839-5070

Facsimile: (650) 839-5071

Attorneys for Defendants

VMWARE, INC. and RED HAT, INC.

Spencer Hosie (CA Bar No. 101777)

shosie@hosielaw.com

Bruce Wecker (CA Bar No. 078530)

bwecker@hosielaw.com

George F. Biship (CA Bar No. 89205)

gbishop@hosielaw.com

HOSIE RICE LLP

188 The Embarcadero, Suite 750

San Francisco, California 94105

Telephone: (415) 247-6000

Facsimile: (415) 247-6001

Attorneys for Plaintiff

IMPLICIT NETWORKS, INC.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

(SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION)

IMPLICIT NETWORKS, INC.

Plaintiff,

v.

VMWARE, INC. and RED HAT, INC.,

Defendants.

Case No. C 10-00720 SI

STIPULATED JOINT MOTION AND

[PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND THE

TIME FOR DEFENDANTS VMWARE,

INC. AND RED HAT, INC. TO RESPOND

TO PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT

///

///

///

Case 3:10-cv-00720-SI Document 34 Filed 06/15/10 Page 1 of 5
2 STIPULATED JT MOT AND [PROP] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME

FOR VMWARE AND RED HAD TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT.

Case No. C 10-00720 SI

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

TO THE COURT AND ALL PARTIES OF RECORD:

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Plaintiff Implicit Networks, Inc. (“Plaintiff”) and

Defendants VMware, Inc. (“VMware”) and Red Hat, Inc. (“Red Hat”) file this Stipulated Joint

Motion and Proposed Order to Extend the Time for Defendants VMware, Inc. and Red Hat, Inc. to

Respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint.

The parties to this action are currently reviewing matters relevant to a possible resolution

of this matter and also have a mutual interest in the orderly and efficient conduct of this litigation.

They agree that this extension of time will assist the parties in either resolving this dispute or in

formulating their pleadings and responses in the present action. Having thus met and conferred on

the issue, the parties hereby stipulate that the deadline for VMware and Red Hat to answer or

otherwise respond to Plaintiff’s complaint should be extended 45 days until July 29, 2010, and

also move the court to order that this deadline be extended to July 29, 2010.

Dated: June 11, 2010 FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.

By: /s/ Tamara Fraizer

Tamara Fraizer

Attorney for Defendants

VMWARE, INC. and RED HAT, INC.

Dated: June 11, 2010 HOSIE RICE LLP

By: /s/ Tamara Fraizer on behalf of George

Bishop

George Bishop

Attorney for Plaintiff

IMPLICIT NETWORKS, INC.

///

///

///

Case 3:10-cv-00720-SI Document 34 Filed 06/15/10 Page 2 of 5
3 STIPULATED JT MOT AND [PROP] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME

FOR VMWARE AND RED HAD TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT.

Case No. C 10-00720 SI

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DECLARATION

Pursuant to General Order No. 45, Section X(B) regarding signatures, I attest under

penalty of perjury that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from George

Bishop.

Dated: June 11, 2010 FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.

By: /s/ Tamara Fraizer

Tamara Fraizer

Attorney for Defendants

VMWARE, INC. and RED HAT, INC.

50718135.doc

Case 3:10-cv-00720-SI Document 34 Filed 06/15/10 Page 3 of 5
4 STIPULATED JT MOT AND [PROP] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME

FOR VMWARE AND RED HAD TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT.

Case No. C 10-00720 SI

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Pursuant to stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED that Defendants VMware, Inc.’s and Red

Hat, Inc.’s answer or other response to Implicit Network’s complaint shall be due on July 29,

2010.

Dated: ________________, 2010.

Honorable Susan Illston

United States District Court Judge

50718135.doc

Case 3:10-cv-00720-SI Document 34 Filed 06/15/10 Page 4 of 5
5 STIPULATED JT MOT AND [PROP] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME

FOR VMWARE AND RED HAD TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

Case No. C 10-00720 SI

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned hereby certifies that on June 11, 2010, all counsel of record who are

deemed to have consented to electronic service are being served with a copy of the

STIPULATED JOINT MOTION TO EXTEND THE TIME FOR DEFENDANTS

VMWARE, INC. AND RED HAD, INC. TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT

via the Court’s CM/ECF system per Local Rule 5-4 and General Order 45. Any other counsel of

record will be served by first class mail.

/s/ Tamara Fraizer

Tamara Fraizer

50718135.doc

Case 3:10-cv-00720-SI Document 34 Filed 06/15/10 Page 5 of 5