Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_17-cv-00359/USCOURTS-cand-3_17-cv-00359-5/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Facebook, Inc.
Defendant
Six4three, LLC
Plaintiff

Document Text:

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SIX4THREE, LLC, a Delaware limited

liability company,

Plaintiff,

 v.

FACEBOOK, INC., a Delaware corporation,

and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive,

Defendant. /

No. C 17-00359 WHA

REQUEST FOR FURTHER

RESPONSE FROM PLAINTIFF

Facebook has withdrawn its opposition to Six4Three’s motion to remand in light of

Six4Three’s unequivocal statement that it would not rely on federal law in support of its Section

17200 claim. Counsel for Six4Three contacted the Court’s deputy, asking whether the hearing

on the pending motion would be vacated. Although all now agree that the action should be

remanded, Six4Three has not withdrawn its request for fees and costs incurred as a result of

removal. By 2:00 P.M. TODAY, Six4Three shall state whether it withdraws its requests for fees

and costs.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 15, 2017. WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:17-cv-00359-WHA Document 31 Filed 02/15/17 Page 1 of 1