Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-01847/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-01847-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Arkine Fresquez
Plaintiff
Unknown
Defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ARKINE FRESQUEZ,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-07-1847 WBS DAD P

vs.

UNKNOWN,

Defendant. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

A recent court order was served on plaintiff's address of record and returned by

the postal service on September 24,2007 as undeliverable. It appears that plaintiff has failed to

comply with Local Rule 83-182(f), which requires that a party appearing in propria persona

inform the court of any address change.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed for

plaintiff's failure to keep the court apprised of his current address. See Local Rules 83-182(f) and

11-110.

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty

days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written

objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s

Case 2:07-cv-01847-WBS-DAD Document 5 Filed 10/03/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the

specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951

F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: October 2, 2007.

DAD:cm

fres1847.33a

Case 2:07-cv-01847-WBS-DAD Document 5 Filed 10/03/07 Page 2 of 2