Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-05092/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-05092-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
City of Hayward
Defendant
Recycle for Change
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

ORDER STAYING PROCEEDINGS PENDING APPEAL IN RELATED CASE

Case No. 3:15-cv-05092

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

John W. Schilt (SBN 221186)

TENAX Law Group, P.C.

145 Park Place, Suite A

Richmond, California 94801

Telephone: (510) 234-2808

Facsimile: (510) 234-6009

Email: johnschilt@tenaxlawgroup.com

Attorneys for Plaintiff RECYCLE FOR CHANGE

MICHAEL S. LAWSON (SBN 048172)

City Attorney

RAFAEL E. ALVARADO JR. (SBN 247904)

Assistant City Attorney

CITY OF HAYWARD

777 B Street, 4th Floor

Hayward, CA 94541-5007

Tel: (510) 583-4450

Fax: (510) 583-3660

Attorneys for Defendant CITY OF HAYWARD

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RECYCLE FOR CHANGE,

Plaintiff,

v.

CITY OF HAYWARD, a California Municipal 

Corporation,

Defendant.

Case No.: 3:15-cv-05092-WHO

Judge: Hon. William H. Orrick, III

ORDER STAYING PROCEEDINGS 

PENDING APPEAL IN RELATED CASE

Case 3:15-cv-05092-WHO Document 21 Filed 04/01/16 Page 1 of 2
ORDER STAYING PROCEEDINGS PENDING APPEAL IN RELATED CASE

Case No. 3:15-cv-05092

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

TO STAY PROCEEDINGS PENDING APPEAL

Plaintiff RECYCLE FOR CHANGE (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant CITY OF HAYWARD 

(“Defendant”), through their respective counsel, have stipulated to stay proceedings in this case 

pending Plaintiff’s appeal to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, in the related case of Recycle for 

Change v. City of Oakland, Case No. 3:15-cv-05093-WHO of an Order denying Plaintiff’s Motion 

for Preliminary Injunction in that case (Dkt. 44).

Good cause is found for the requested stay because this case was previously deemed a related 

case to Recycle for Change v. City of Oakland. There are common issues of law between the two 

cases, and the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals’ ruling on Plaintiff’s pending appeal is likely to be 

significant to this case. A stay in this case will be an efficient use of the time and resources of the 

parties and of the Court. 

THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this matter is STAYED pending resolution of 

Plaintiff’s appeal in Recycle for Change v. City of Oakland, No. 16-15295, or further order of this 

Court. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 1, 2016

______________________________

Hon. William J. Orrick

District Court Judge

Case 3:15-cv-05092-WHO Document 21 Filed 04/01/16 Page 2 of 2