Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_13-cv-02535/USCOURTS-caed-2_13-cv-02535-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Ranjit K. Rai
Defendant
Julie Brown
Plaintiff
Starbucks Corporation
Defendant

Document Text:

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

JULIE BROWN, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

RANJIT K. RAI, STARBUCKS 

CORPORATION, 

Defendants. 

No. 2:13-cv-2535-TLN-EFB 

ORDER 

 On June 5, 2014, plaintiff filed an application for entry of default judgment against 

defendant Ranjit Rai, and noticed the motion for hearing before the assigned district judge. ECF 

No. 9. The district judge vacated the hearing and directed plaintiff to notice her motion for 

hearing before the undersigned as required by Local Rule 302(c)(19). ECF No. 10. To date, 

plaintiff has not re-noticed the motion, or otherwise responded to the minute order. Given that 

more than seven months have passed since the hearing was vacated, it appears that plaintiff is no 

longer interested in litigating her motion. Accordingly, the motion (ECF No. 9) is denied without 

prejudice. 

DATED: March 19, 2015. 

Case 2:13-cv-02535-TLN-EFB Document 13 Filed 03/19/15 Page 1 of 1