Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_15-cv-05504/USCOURTS-cand-4_15-cv-05504-4/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
City College of California
Defendant
City College of San Francisco
Defendant
Carol Thomas
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CAROL THOMAS,

Plaintiff,

v.

CITY COLLEGE OF SAN FRANCISCO, et 

al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 15-cv-05504-HSG 

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S 

MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT

Re: Dkt. No. 47

Plaintiff Carol Thomas (“Plaintiff”) has filed a motion for default judgment on the grounds 

that Defendants City College of San Francisco and City College of California (“Defendants”) have

not yet filed an answer in this matter. Dkt. No. 47. Defendants oppose the motion on the grounds 

that they have timely filed a motion to dismiss under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6), 

which is pending before the Court. Dkt. No. 48; see also Dkt. No. 37 (motion to dismiss).

Defendant is correct. Serving a Rule 12 motion to dismiss postpones the deadline to file a 

responsive pleading until 14 days after notice of the Court’s action on the motion. Fed. R. Civ. P. 

12(a)(4)(A). Accordingly, the Court DENIES Plaintiff’s motion for default judgment.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated:

HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR.

United States District Judge

8/30/2016

Case 4:15-cv-05504-HSG Document 49 Filed 08/30/16 Page 1 of 1