Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca10-24-00706/USCOURTS-ca10-24-00706-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Boselli Investments LLC
Petitioner
Ana Rodriguez
Respondent

Document Text:

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

_________________________________

BOSELLI INVESTMENTS LLC, 

 Petitioner,

v.

ANA RODRIGUEZ, individually and on 

behalf of all similarly situated persons, 

 Respondent.

No. 24-706

(D.C. No. 1:23-CV-00314-SKC-TPO)

(D. Colo.)

_________________________________

ORDER

_________________________________

Before TYMKOVICH, MATHESON, and McHUGH, Circuit Judges.

_________________________________

This matter is before the court on a Petition for Permission to Appeal under 28 

U.S.C. § 1453(c) by Boselli Investments LLC, and on a stipulated motion for a 7-day 

extension of time for Ana Rodriguez to file a response to the petition.

Boselli Investments seeks permission to appeal the district court’s order 

remanding Ms. Rodriguez’s class action to Colorado state court. The Class Action 

Fairness Act authorizes this court to “accept an appeal from an order of a district court 

granting or denying a motion to remand a class action to the State court from which it 

was removed . . . .” 28 U.S.C. § 1453(c)(1). Whether to accept an appeal from such a 

remand order is committed to our informed discretion. BP America v. Oklahoma ex rel. 

Edmondson, 613 F.3d 1029, 1034 (10th Cir. 2010). In BP America, we identified a 

FILED

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

December 6, 2024

Christopher M. Wolpert

Clerk of Court

Appellate Case: 24-706 Document: 4-1 Date Filed: 12/06/2024 Page: 1
2

number of factors we generally consider in exercising our discretion. Id. at 1035. Boselli 

Investments has not shown that an exercise of our discretion to allow an appeal from the 

district court’s remand order is warranted under any of the considerations outlined in BP 

America. Accordingly, the Petition for Permission to Appeal is denied. The stipulated 

motion for extension of time is denied as moot.

Entered for the Court

CHRISTOPHER M. WOLPERT, Clerk

by: Jane K. Castro

 Chief Deputy Clerk

Appellate Case: 24-706 Document: 4-1 Date Filed: 12/06/2024 Page: 2