Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-02248/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-02248-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Vernita Jackson
Plaintiff
Sacramento Sheriff Department
Defendant

Document Text:

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

VERNITA JACKSON, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

SACRAMENTO SHERIFF 

DEPARTMENT, 

Defendant. 

No. 2:15-cv-2248 AC P (TEMP) 

ORDER AND 

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 

 On November 12, 2015, the court ordered plaintiff to file an in forma pauperis affidavit or 

pay the appropriate filing fee within thirty days and cautioned plaintiff that failure to do so would 

result dismissal of this action without prejudice. The thirty-day period has now expired, and 

plaintiff has not responded to the court’s order and has not filed an in forma pauperis affidavit or 

paid the appropriate filing fee.1

 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is directed to 

randomly assign a United States District Judge to this action. 

IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. 

 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 

 

1

 Although it appears from the file that plaintiff’s copy of the court’s order was returned, plaintiff 

was properly served. It is the plaintiff’s responsibility to keep the court apprised of her current 

address at all times. Pursuant to Local Rule 182(f), service of documents at the record address of 

the party is fully effective. 

Case 2:15-cv-02248-TLN-AC Document 6 Filed 01/07/16 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 

after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections 

with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings 

and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified 

time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 

(9th Cir. 1991). 

DATED: January 5, 2016 

Case 2:15-cv-02248-TLN-AC Document 6 Filed 01/07/16 Page 2 of 2