Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-05216/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-05216-2/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Aetna Life Insurance Company
Defendant
Nina Hawker
Plaintiff

Document Text:

54700 stipulation(3).doc 1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

BERGER

KAHN

A Law Corporation

P.O. Box 92621

Los Angeles, CA 90009-9998

RONALD K. ALBERTS, ESQ. (SBN 100017)

BERGER KAHN

A Law Corporation

Mail Service:

Post Office Box 92621

Los Angeles, CA 90009-9998

Location:

4215 Glencoe Avenue, 2nd Floor

Marina del Rey, CA 90292-5634

Tel: (310) 821-9000 • Fax: (310) 578-6178

Attorneys for Defendant AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

NINA HAWKER,

Plaintiff,

vs.

AETNA LIFE INSURANCE

COMPANY, and DOES 1 THROUGH

100, INCLUSIVE,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO. C 04 5216 EDL

JUDGE: Elizabeth D. Laporte

STIPULATION FOR CONTINUANCE

OF CASE MANAGEMENT

CONFERENCE

Both Plaintiff Nina Hawker and Defendant Aetna Life Insurance Company request

that this Court continue the Case Management Conference, currently scheduled for

September 30, 2005, at 10:00 a.m., to December 6, 2005, at 3 p.m., or another date

convenient with the Court’s calendar. The parties have had additional settlement

discussions and request additional time in order to resolve certain pending issues. It is

Case 3:04-cv-05216-EDL Document 31 Filed 09/30/05 Page 1 of 3
54700 stipulation(3).doc 2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

BERGER

KAHN

A Law Corporation

P.O. Box 92621

Los Angeles, CA 90009-9998

anticipated that these issues may be resolved, and perhaps the case resolved in its

entirety, should the requested continuance be granted.

DATED: September 28, 2005 Greene & Mayer

/S/ ALAN M. MAYER

ALAN M. MAYER

Attorney for Plaintiff NINA HAWKER

DATED: September 28, 2005 BERGER KAHN

A Law Corporation

/S/ RONALD K. ALBERTS

RONALD K. ALBERTS

Attorney for Defendant AETNA LIFE

INSURANCE COMPANY

Upon request of both parties and good cause appearing for the requested

continuance,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Case Management Conference, currently set

for September 30, 2005, at 10:00 a.m., is continued to December 6, 2005, at 3 p.m.

DATED: _________, 2005 ________________________________

Elizabeth D. Laporte, Judge of the

United States District Court, Northern

District of California

September 30 U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte

Case 3:04-cv-05216-EDL Document 31 Filed 09/30/05 Page 2 of 3
54700 stipulation(3).doc 3

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

BERGER

KAHN

A Law Corporation

P.O. Box 92621

Los Angeles, CA 90009-9998

AFFIDAVIT AND DECLARATION OF PROOF OF SERVICE

I am over the age of eighteen years and not a party to the within action. I am employed by Berger Kahn, A Law Corporation, whose business address is: 4215

Glencoe Avenue, 2nd Floor, Marina del Rey, California 90292 ("the firm").

On September 29, 2005, I served the within document(s) described as: Stipulation for Continuance of Case Management Conference on the interested

parties in this action by placing true copy(ies) thereof enclosed in sealed envelope(s)

addressed as follows:

Alan M. Mayer, Esq.

MAYER & GREENE

1120 Nye Street, Suite 200

San Rafael, CA 94901

(415) 457-4082

(415) 457-6439 (fax)

BY MAIL(C.C.P. § 1013(a))–I deposited such envelope(s) for processing in the mail room in our offices. I am “readily familiar” with the firm’s practice of

collection and processing correspondence for mailing. It is deposited with the

U.S. Postal Service on that same day with postage thereon fully prepaid at Marina

del Rey, California, in the ordinary course of business. I am aware that on motion

of a party served, service is presumed invalid if postal cancellation date or postage

meter date is more than one day after the date of deposit for mailing in affidavit.

I am “readily familiar” with the firm’s practice of collection and processing of

correspondence for service with said overnight mail service. It is deposited with

said overnight mail service on that same day in the ordinary course of business. I

am aware that, on motion of a party served, service is presumed invalid if the said

overnight delivery service cancellation date or delivery date on the overnight

delivery service slip is more than one day after the date of deposit with said

overnight delivery service contained in this affidavit.

(Federal) I declare that I am employed in the office of a member of the bar of this

Court at whose direction the service was made.

Executed on September 29, 2005, at Marina del Rey, California.

/S/ KAREN WILLIAMS

KAREN WILLIAMS

Case 3:04-cv-05216-EDL Document 31 Filed 09/30/05 Page 3 of 3