Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-15-06194/USCOURTS-ca4-15-06194-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
William Byars
Appellee
Donald Lane
Appellee
Anthony Fred Martin
Appellant

Document Text:

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-6194

ANTHONY FRED MARTIN,

 Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

WILLIAM BYARS; DONALD LANE,

 Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Florence. David C. Norton, District Judge. 

(4:13-cv-03179-DCN)

Submitted: May 19, 2015 Decided: May 22, 2015

Before NIEMEYER and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Anthony Fred Martin, Appellant Pro Se. James Victor McDade, 

DOYLE, O’ROURKE, TATE & MCDADE, PA, Anderson, South Carolina, 

for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 15-6194 Doc: 16 Filed: 05/22/2015 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Anthony Fred Martin appeals the district court’s order 

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying 

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have 

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, 

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Martin 

v. Byars, No. 4:13-cv-03179-DCN (D.S.C. filed Jan. 29 & entered 

Jan. 30, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the 

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Appeal: 15-6194 Doc: 16 Filed: 05/22/2015 Pg: 2 of 2