Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_15-cv-01065/USCOURTS-caed-1_15-cv-01065-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Eva Hammond
Plaintiff
Omnicare, Inc.
Defendant

Document Text:

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

EVA HAMMOND,

Plaintiff,

v.

OMNICARE, INC.; DOES 1 – 100,

Defendants.

CASE NO. 1:15-CV-01065 --- JLT

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION FOR 

PLAINTIFF TO FILE FIRST AMENDED

COMPLAINT

(Doc. 7)

ORDER STRIKING “FIRST AMENDED 

COMPLAINT AGAINST EVA HAMMOND”

(Doc. 5)

Before the Court is a stipulation of counsel allowing the filing of a first amended 

complaint. (Doc. 7) Notably, at the same time as the filing of the stipulation, Plaintiff filed two 

documents; one entitled “First Amended Complaint against Eva Hammond” (Doc. 5) and one 

entitled “First Amended Complaint against Omnicare, Inc.” (Doc. 6). It appears the second filing 

was made due to the error in docketing in which Plaintiff indicated the complaint was filed 

against her rather than being filed by her. Therefore, the Court ORDERS:

1. The stipulation (Doc. 7) to file the first amended complaint (Doc. 6) is 

GRANTED;

2. The document entitled “First Amended Complaint against Eva Hammond” (Doc. 

5) is STRICKEN;

///

Case 1:15-cv-01065-JLT Document 9 Filed 08/07/15 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3. The operative pleading is First Amended Complaint against Omnicare, Inc.” (Doc. 

6). 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 7, 2015 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:15-cv-01065-JLT Document 9 Filed 08/07/15 Page 2 of 2