Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-01891/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-01891-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Jackson Long
Plaintiff
asap Collection Svc. LLC
Defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JACKSON LONG,

Plaintiff,

v.

ASAP COLLECTION SVC. LLC,

Defendant.

Case No. 16-cv-01891-MEJ 

ORDER CONTINUING CASE 

MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

The Court is in receipt of Plaintiff Jackson Long (“Plaintiff”)’s Ex Parte Request for a 

continuance of the initial Case Management Conference scheduled for July 14, 2016. Dkt. No. 7. 

Plaintiff requests the Conference be continued for 90 days. Id. 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16(b) and 

Civil Local Rule 16-10, a Case Management Conference will be held in this case before the 

Honorable Maria-Elena James on September 8, 2016 at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom B, 15th Floor, 

450 Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco, CA 94102. This conference shall be attended by lead

trial counsel for parties who are represented. Parties who are proceeding without counsel must 

appear personally.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no later than seven calendar days before the Case 

Management Conference, the parties shall file a Joint Case Management Statement containing the 

information in the Standing Order for All Judges in the Northern District of California, available 

at: http://cand.uscourts.gov/mejorders. The Joint Case Management Statement form may be 

obtained at: http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. If the statement is e-filed, no chambers copy is 

required. 

Plaintiff must serve a copy of this Order on Defendant and by August 11, 2016, file with 

the Court a related proof of service or a status report as to why Defendant has not been served. 

Case 3:16-cv-01891-MEJ Document 8 Filed 07/06/16 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

Additionally, in the future, all requests or motions to change time must comply with Civil Local

Rule 6 and specifically Civil Local Rule 6-3, which requires among other things, a proposed order 

and a declaration setting forth “with particularity” the reasons for the requested enlargement of 

time, the efforts to obtain a stipulation to change time, and the substantial harm or prejudice that 

would occur if the Court did not change the time. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 6, 2016

______________________________________

MARIA-ELENA JAMES

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:16-cv-01891-MEJ Document 8 Filed 07/06/16 Page 2 of 2