Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-15-07593/USCOURTS-ca4-15-07593-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Monique Michelle Arp
Appellant
United States of America
Appellee

Document Text:

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-7593

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

MONIQUE MICHELLE ARP,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Florence. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge. 

(4:13-cr-00230-RBH-1)

Submitted: February 5, 2016 Decided: February 10, 2016

Before MOTZ, AGEE, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Monique Michelle Arp, Appellant Pro Se. Alfred William Walker 

Bethea, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South 

Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 15-7593 Doc: 7 Filed: 02/10/2016 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Monique Michelle Arp appeals the district court’s order

denying her 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for a sentence 

reduction based on U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual, App. C, 

Amend. 782 (2015). We have reviewed the record and find no 

reversible error because Arp’s sentence was the result of a Fed. 

R. Crim. P. 11(c)(1)(C) plea agreement. Arp’s stipulated sentence 

was not based on the Sentencing Guidelines, so Amendment 782 does 

not apply. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the 

district court. United States v. Arp, No. 4:13-cr-00230-RBH-1 

(D.S.C. Apr. 17, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because 

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Appeal: 15-7593 Doc: 7 Filed: 02/10/2016 Pg: 2 of 2