Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-00904/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-00904-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Kristofer Miller
Counter Defendant
Sashco, Inc.
Counter Claimant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

436.01.PLE.amended stipulation.complaint.answer.wpd 1

AMENDED STIPULATION TO PERMIT FILING OF AMENDED PLEADINGS; ORDER THEREON

MENNEMEIER, GLASSMAN & STROUD LLP

KENNETH C. MENNEMEIER (SBN 113973)

980 9th Street, Suite 1700

Sacramento, CA 95814

Telephone: (916) 553-4000

Facsimile: (916) 553-4011

E-mail: kcm@mgslaw.com

Attorneys for Plaintiff

KRISTOFER MILLER dba COLD SPRINGS CONSTRUCTION

MOYE WHITE LLP

Dart M. Winkler (SBN 230599)

1400 Market Square, 6 Floor th

Denver, CO 80202-1473

Telephone: (303) 292-2900

Facsimile: (303) 292-4510

E-mail: dart.winkler@moyewhite.com 

Attorneys for Defendant

SASHCO, INC., a Colorado corporation

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KRISTOFER MILLER dba COLD

SPRINGS CONSTRUCTION,

Plaintiff,

v.

SASHCO, INC., a Colorado corporation,

Defendant.

____________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO: 2:07-CV-00904 GEB/KJM

AMENDED STIPULATION TO PERMIT

FILING OF (1) PLAINTIFF’S FIRST

AMENDED COMPLAINT, AND (2)

DEFENDANT’S AMENDED ANSWER AND

COUNTERCLAIMS; ORDER THEREON

The parties, by and through their counsel of record, stipulate as follows:

RECITALS

Whereas, the Court’s Pretrial Scheduling Order of August 8, 2007 (Docket No. 9)

gave the parties until September 17, 2007, to seek leave to file amended pleadings (see Status

(Pretrial Scheduling) Order filed August 8, 2007, at 2);

Whereas, on September 17, 2007, the parties timely filed a “Stipulation to Permit

Filing of (1) Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint, and (2) Defendant’s Amended Answer and

Counterclaims” (Docket No. 13), with their proposed amended pleadings attached thereto;

Case 2:07-cv-00904-GEB -KJM Document 15 Filed 10/02/07 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

436.01.PLE.amended stipulation.complaint.answer.wpd 2

AMENDED STIPULATION TO PERMIT FILING OF AMENDED PLEADINGS; ORDER THEREON

Whereas, the parties subsequently noticed that, as a result of having the

documents scanned, the filed version of Plaintiff’s proposed amended complaint did not include

page number 12; 

Whereas, the parties want to provide the Court with a complete copy of their

amended pleadings;

Whereas, Plaintiff has timely sought leave to file an amended complaint

(“Amended Complaint”);

Whereas, Defendant has timely sought leave to file an amended answer with

counterclaims (“Amended Answer”);

Whereas, the parties submit this Amended Stipulation for the sole purpose of

putting a complete copy of their amended pleadings before the Court;

STIPULATION

The parties stipulate and agree as follows:

A. The Court may grant Plaintiff leave to file an Amended Complaint, in the

form attached hereto as Exhibit A;

B. The Court may grant Defendant leave to file an Amended Answer, in the

form attached hereto as Exhibit B;

C. Plaintiff’s response to the counterclaims added by the Amended Answer is

due on October 4, 2007;

D. Defendant’s response to the Amended Complaint is due on October 4,

2007.

Dated: September 27, 2007 MENNEMEIER, GLASSMAN & STROUD LLP

KENNETH C. MENNEMEIER

By: /s/ Kenneth C. Mennemeier 

Kenneth C. Mennemeier

Attorneys for Plaintiff Kristofer Miller

Dated: September 27, 2007 MOYE WHITE LLP

DART M. WINKLER

By: /s/ Dart M. Winkler 

Dart M. Winkler, Attorneys for Defendant Sashco,

Inc., a Colorado corporation

Case 2:07-cv-00904-GEB -KJM Document 15 Filed 10/02/07 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

436.01.PLE.amended stipulation.complaint.answer.wpd 3

AMENDED STIPULATION TO PERMIT FILING OF AMENDED PLEADINGS; ORDER THEREON

ORDER UPON PARTIES’ STIPULATION

In light of the parties’ stipulation, and good cause appearing therefore:

1. The Court grants Plaintiff leave to file a First Amended Complaint, and

the Amended Complaint attached hereto is deemed filed;

2. The Court grants Defendant leave to file an Amended Answer with

Counterclaims, and the Amended Answer attached hereto is deemed filed;

3. Plaintiff’s response to Defendant’s counterclaims is due no later than

October 4, 2007;

4. Defendant’s response to Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint is due no

later than October 4, 2007.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 1, 2007

 

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.

United States District Judge

Case 2:07-cv-00904-GEB -KJM Document 15 Filed 10/02/07 Page 3 of 3