Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_09-cv-03249/USCOURTS-cand-3_09-cv-03249-5/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Susan Biba
Plaintiff
Greater Bay Bancorp
Defendant
The Greater Bay Bancorp Change in Control Plan I
Defendant
Wells Fargo & Company
Defendant

Document Text:

Page 1

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE HEARING DATE ON DEFENDANTS’ 

MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

USDC-CAND Case No. CV093249MEJ

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

HARRY G. LEWIS (SBN 157705)

EVELYN LOW (SBN 66636)

JULIE A. MARQUIS (SBN 178466)

CORNERSTONE LAW GROUP

595 Market Street, Suite 2360

San Francisco, CA 94105

Telephone: (415) 974-1900

Facsimile: (415) 974-6433

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

SUSAN BIBA

MICHAEL D. BRUNO (SBN 166805)

MARCIE S. ISOM (SBN 226906)

GORDON & REES LLP

275 Battery Street, Suite 2000

San Francisco, CA 94111

Telephone: (415) 986-5900

Facsimile: (415) 986-8054

Attorneys for Defendants

WELLS FARGO & CO., GREATER BAY 

BANCORP, THE GREATER BAY BANCORP 

CHANGE IN CONTROL PLAN I

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SUSAN BIBA, 

Plaintiff,

vs.

WELLS FARGO & COMPANY, a 

Delaware Corporation; GREATER BAY 

BANCORP, a California Corporation; THE 

GREATER BAY BANCORP CHANGE 

IN CONTROL PLAN I, 

Defendants.

CASE NO. CV093249 MEJ

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER TO CONTINUE HEARING 

DATE ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION 

FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

The parties hereby stipulate as follows:

1. Due to the schedule of plaintiff’s trial counsel, including a family trip 

outside the country over the currently scheduled July 1, 2010 hearing date, and deadlines 

Case 3:09-cv-03249-MEJ Document 33 Filed 06/04/10 Page 1 of 3
Page 2

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE HEARING DATE ON DEFENDANTS’ 

MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

USDC-CAND Case No. CV093249MEJ

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

to file oppositions to two summary judgment motions in another matter on June 2, 2010, 

the parties request and do hereby stipulate to an extension of the July 1, 2010 hearing 

date on defendants’ motion for summary judgment in this matter for one week to July 8, 

2010.

2. With the extension of the hearing date, the time to file plaintiff’s 

opposition to defendants’ summary judgment motion and defendants’ reply will also be 

continued to reflect the new hearing date. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

DATED: June 3, 2010 CORNERSTONE LAW GROUP

By: /s/

Harry G. Lewis

Attorneys for Plaintiff SUSAN BIBA 

DATED: June 3, 2010 GORDON & REES, LLP

By: /s/

Marcie S. Isom

Attorneys for Defendants WELLS FARGO & 

CO., GREATER BAY BANCORP, THE 

GREATER BAY BANCORP CHANGE IN 

CONTROL PLAN I

The court, having considered the parties’ Stipulation to Continue Hearing Date on 

Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment, and good cause appearing therefore, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The hearing on defendants’ motion for summary judgment is continued to 

Thursday, July 8, 2010 at 10:00 a.m. 

15

Case 3:09-cv-03249-MEJ Document 33 Filed 06/04/10 Page 2 of 3
Page 3

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE HEARING DATE ON DEFENDANTS’ 

MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

USDC-CAND Case No. CV093249MEJ

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2. The deadline to file plaintiff’s opposition to defendants’ summary 

judgment motion and defendants’ reply are also continued to reflect the new hearing date. 

DATED: June ___, 2010

The Honorable Maria-Elena James

4

Case 3:09-cv-03249-MEJ Document 33 Filed 06/04/10 Page 3 of 3