Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-01799/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-01799-5/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Felker
Defendant
Johnnie Lambert
Plaintiff
Stevens
Defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOHNNIE LAMBERT,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-07-1799 GEB GGH P

vs.

WARDEN FELKER, et al.,

Defendants. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

By an order filed January 30, 2008, this court ordered plaintiff to complete and

return to the court, within sixty days, the USM-285 forms necessary to effect service on

defendant Stevens. That sixty day period has since passed, and plaintiff has not responded in any

way to the court’s order.

IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that the claims against defendant Stevens be

dismissed. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations will be submitted to the United States

District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within

twenty days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file

written objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Findings

and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified

Case 2:07-cv-01799-GEB-GGH Document 16 Filed 07/30/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153

(9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: 07/30/08

/s/ Gregory G. Hollows

 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

lam1799.fusm

Case 2:07-cv-01799-GEB-GGH Document 16 Filed 07/30/08 Page 2 of 2