Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-01049/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-01049-4/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Tovia LaFaele
Plaintiff
Arnold Schwarzenegger
Defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TOVIA LAFAELE,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-06-1049 FCD DAD P

vs.

ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER,

Defendant. ORDER

 /

On July 10, 2006, plaintiff’s civil rights complaint was dismissed with leave to

amend. The July 10, 2006 order sets out the applicable legal standards and provides extensive

analysis of the issues raised by plaintiff. Plaintiff subsequently requested and received two

extensions of time to amend his complaint. The amended complaint is now two weeks overdue.

Prior to the October 5, 2006 deadline, the court received from plaintiff two letters

in which he expressed concern about meeting the deadline, but did not request a further extension

of time. In the interests of justice, the court will construe plaintiff’s letters as yet another request

for extension of time. A final extension of time will be granted by this order. If plaintiff fails to

file his amended complaint within thirty days after this order is filed, the undersigned will

recommend that the district judge dismiss this action without prejudice to the filing of a new

action when plaintiff is ready to proceed.

Case 2:06-cv-01049-FCD-DAD Document 17 Filed 10/23/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff’s letters filed September 14, 2006, and September 29, 2006, are

construed as a request for a third extension of time; and

2. Plaintiff is granted thirty days from the date on which this order is filed in

which to file an amended complaint; no further extension of time will be granted for this

purpose; failure to file a timely amended complaint will result in a recommendation that this

action be dismissed without prejudice.

DATED: October 20, 2006.

DAD:13

lafa1049.36t

Case 2:06-cv-01049-FCD-DAD Document 17 Filed 10/23/06 Page 2 of 2