Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cr-00245/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cr-00245-4/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Barry Nufeld
Defendant
USA
Plaintiff

Document Text:

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff(s),

 v.

BARRY NUFELD,

Defendant(s). /

No. CR 05-0245 MHP

ORDER REVOKING SUPERVISED

RELEASE AND JUDGEMENT

This matter came on pursuant to an Order to Show Cause why supervised release should not

be revoked. Defendant appeared in person with his attorney Elizabeth Falk. The United States was

represented by Assistant United States Attorney Susan Badger.

The defendant was advised of the following:

1. His right to a hearing on the alleged violations of supervised release;

2. His right to confront and cross-examine witnesses;

3. His right to produce evidence and witnesses at the hearing without cost to him if he

could not afford the same;

4. His right to continue to have court appointed counsel represent him throughout the

proceedings; and

5. The nature of the revocation proceedings and the consequences if a violation was

found and supervised release revoked or modified.

The court finds that defendant was fully advised of his constitutional and statutory rights in

connection with these proceedings either as a basis for modification or revocation; that he fully

understands the nature of the proceeding and the defenses that he may assert in the proceeding; that

he fully understands the consequences of the proceeding; and that he freely and voluntarily waives

Case 3:05-cr-00245-MHP Document 51 Filed 07/27/07 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

his right to a hearing, his counsel consenting thereto.

The court finds that the defendant has admitted to the violations as alleged in the petition to

revoke and that such violations are sufficient cause to revoke supervised release.

Charge 1: Violation of Standard Condition Number Two which requires the defendant to

file a truthful and complete report within the first five days of each month in

that defendant failed to submit monthly supervision report forms that were

due on March 5 and April 5, 2006.

Charge 2: Violation of Special Condition Number One which states that defendant

participate in a program of treatment for drug/alcohol abuse until such time

defendant is released from treatment by the US Probation Officer, in that

defendant failed to report for counseling on March 6, 2006; Walden House

Program disclosed that the defendant was not participating in residential

services; Defendant further failed to report to Weyland Consultation Services

for drug testing on March 14, March 18, March 27, April 10, and April 18,

2006.

Charge 7: Violation of Standard Condition which requires that defendant not commit

another federal, state, or local crime in that on or about October 19, 2006,

defendant was found squatting on 1599 Harrison Street in San Francisco, and

in possession of marijuana and suspected methamphetamine/paraphernalia. 

Based on the foregoing,

IT IS ADJUDGED that supervised release is hereby REVOKED, and that defendant is

remanded into the custody of the Attorney General or his authorized representative for a term of

nine (9) months. No further Supervised Release ordered. Counts three, four, and five of the July 9,

2007 petition are dismissed.

Dated: July 26, 2007

MARILYN HALL PATEL

United States District Court

Case 3:05-cr-00245-MHP Document 51 Filed 07/27/07 Page 2 of 2