Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca5-13-20557/USCOURTS-ca5-13-20557-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
John Berley Scott
Appellant
United States of America
Appellee

Document Text:

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-20557

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JOHN BERLEY SCOTT, also known as Fresh,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:11-CR-61-8

Before REAVLEY, DENNIS, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent John Berley Scott has moved for 

leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 

386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011).

Scott has filed a response. The record is not sufficiently developed to allow us 

to make a fair evaluation of Scott’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel; 

we therefore decline to consider the claim without prejudice to collateral 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

January 6, 2015

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 

 Case: 13-20557 Document: 00512890421 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/06/2015
No. 13-20557

review. See United States v. Isgar, 739 F.3d 829, 841 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 

135 S. Ct. 123 (2014).

We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record 

reflected therein, as well as Scott’s response. We concur with counsel’s 

assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. 

Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused 

from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See

5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

2

 Case: 13-20557 Document: 00512890421 Page: 2 Date Filed: 01/06/2015