Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_12-cv-03046/USCOURTS-caed-2_12-cv-03046-3/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Cedarville County Water District
Defendant
Cedarville Rancheria
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

CEDARVILLE RANCHERIA, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

CEDARVILLE COUNTY WATER 

DISTRICT, DOES 1 through 100, 

inclusive, 

Defendants. 

No. CIV. S-12-3046 LKK/CMK 

ORDER 

The parties have filed a “Joint Request” to approve their 

stipulation extending the deadline for filing rebuttals to expert 

witness disclosures by thirty (30) days. (ECF No. 23.) 

The Joint Request does not show good cause for the court to 

alter, or permit exceptions to, the Status (Pretrial Scheduling) 

Conference Order (“Scheduling Order”) of March 13, 2013. 

If the parties wish to make informal arrangements regarding 

discovery deadlines, they are free to do so. However, any such 

consensual modifications to the Scheduling Order will not be 

enforced by the court. 

//// 

Case 2:12-cv-03046-JAM-CMK Document 24 Filed 11/25/13 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2 

Accordingly, the Joint Request is DENIED. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: November 22, 2013. 

Case 2:12-cv-03046-JAM-CMK Document 24 Filed 11/25/13 Page 2 of 2