Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_15-cv-00104/USCOURTS-caed-1_15-cv-00104-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Garieanne Marie Areias
Plaintiff
Commissioner of Social Security
Defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GARIEANNE MARIE AREIAS,

Plaintiff,

v.

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,

Defendant.

Case No. 1:15-cv-00104-LJO-SAB

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 

RECOMMENDING DISMISSING ACTION 

FOR FAILURE TO PAY FILING FEE

OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN FOURTEEN 

DAYS

On January 21, 2015, Plaintiff Garieanne Marie Areias (“Plaintiff”) filed the complaint in 

this action seeking judicial review of the final decision of Defendant Commissioner of Social 

Security (“Defendant”) denying Plaintiff’s application for benefits under the Social Security Act. 

(ECF No. 1.) On January 23, 2015, Plaintiff was found to be ineligible to proceed without 

prepayment of fees and was ordered to pay the filing fee within thirty days. Plaintiff was advised 

that failure to comply with the order would result in this action being dismissed. (ECF No. 3.) 

More than thirty days have passed and Plaintiff has not paid the filing fee in this action or 

otherwise responded to the Court’s order.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without 

prejudice for Plaintiffs’ failure to pay the filing fee in compliance with the January 22, 2015 

order of the Court.

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the district judge assigned to this 

Case 1:15-cv-00104-LJO-SAB Document 6 Filed 03/06/15 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

action, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and this Court’s Local Rule 304. Within fourteen 

(14) days of service of this recommendation, any party may file written objections to these 

findings and recommendations with the Court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document 

should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” The 

district judge will review the magistrate judge’s findings and recommendations pursuant to 28 

U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). The parties are advised that failure to file objections within the specified 

time may result in the waiver of rights on appeal. Wilkerson v. Wheeler, 772 F.3d 834, 839 (9th 

Cir. 2014) (citing Baxter v. Sullivan, 923 F.2d 1391, 1394 (9th Cir. 1991)).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 6, 2015 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:15-cv-00104-LJO-SAB Document 6 Filed 03/06/15 Page 2 of 2