Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-02732/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-02732-23/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Panoptx, Inc.
Counter-claimant
Protective Optics, Inc.
Counter-defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO FURTHER EXTEND PARTIES’ DEADLINES TO FILE BRIEFS FOR SUMMARY

JUDGMENT MOTION AND SANCTIONS MOTION; CASE NO. C05-02732 CRB

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

PROTECTIVE OPTICS, INC.,

a California corporation

Plaintiff,

v.

PANOPTX INC.,

a California corporation

Defendant.

Case No. C05-02732 CRB

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

TO FURTHER EXTEND PARTIES’

DEADLINES TO FILE BRIEFS FOR

SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND

SANCTIONS MOTION

Courtroom: 8, 19th Floor

Before: Hon. Charles R. Breyer

[Trial Date: August 6, 2007]

AND RELATED CROSS-ACTION

E. Patrick Ellisen, CA Bar No. 142033

ellisenp@gtlaw.com

Daniel T. McCloskey, CA Bar No. 191944

mccloskeyd@gtlaw.com

GREENBERG TRAURIG LLP

1900 University Avenue 5th Floor

East Palo Alto, CA 94303

Telephone: (650) 328-8500

Facsimile: (650) 328-8508

Brian A. Carpenter, pro hac vice

carpenterb@gtlaw.com

GREENBERG TRAURIG LLP

1200 17th Street, Suite 2400

Denver, CO 80202

Telephone: (303) 572-6500

Facsimile: (303) 572-6540

Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterclaim-Defendant,

PROTECTIVE OPTICS, INC.

Case 3:05-cv-02732-CRB Document 192 Filed 06/08/07 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND PARTIES’ DEADLINES TO FILE BRIEFS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

MOTION AND SANCTIONS MOTION;

CASE NO. C05-02732 CRB

Plaintiff and Counterclaim-Defendant Protective Optics, Inc. and Defendant and

Counterclaimant Panoptx, Inc. (collectively, the “Parties”), by and through their undersigned

attorneys, state and agree as follows:

Whereas, under previous stipulated order, Protective’s Reply brief in support of its Motion for

Partial Summary Judgment on Panoptx’s Seventh Affirmative Defense for Patent Invalidity Under 35

U.S.C. §112 [Docket No. 163] (“Summary Judgment Motion”), set for hearing on June 15, 2007, is

currently due to be filed not later than June 5, 2007;

Whereas, under previous stipulated order, Panoptx’s Opposition to Protective’s Motion for

Sanctions Against Panoptx for Violations of this Court’s February 6 and March 30 Orders

Compelling Discovery [Docket No. 168] (“Sanctions Motion”), set for hearing on June 22, 2007, is

currently due to be filed not later than June 5, 2007, and Protective’s Reply brief is due to be filed not

later than June 12, 2007;

Whereas, the Parties have reached a tentative settlement and will be before Judge Chen on

June 6, 2007 to enter the settlement on the record;

Whereas, given the tentative settlement, the Parties agree that the due date for Protective’s

Reply in support of its Summary Judgment Motion and for Panoptx’s Opposition to the Sanctions

Motion should be extended to June 12, 2007, and that Protective’s Reply brief in support of its

Sanctions Motion should be extended to June 19, 2007;

NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the Parties, subject to

Court approval, as follows, that:

1. the due date for Protective’s Reply in support of its Summary Judgment

Motion and for Panoptx’s Opposition to the Sanctions Motion should be

extended to June 12, 2007, and that Protective’s Reply brief in support of its

Sanctions Motion should be extended to June 19, 2007.

///

///

///

///

Case 3:05-cv-02732-CRB Document 192 Filed 06/08/07 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO FURTHER EXTEND PARTIES’ DEADLINES TO FILE BRIEFS FOR SUMMARY

JUDGMENT MOTION AND SANCTIONS MOTION;

CASE NO. C05-02732 CRB

DATED: June 5, 2007 GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP

By: /s/ Daniel T. McCloskey

Daniel T. McCloskey

Attorneys for Plaintiff and CounterclaimDefendant,

PROTECTIVE OPTICS, INC.

DATED: June 5, 2007 KRIEG, KELLER, SLOAN, REILLEY & ROMAN, LLP

By: /s/

Michael D. Lisi

Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant,

PANOPTX, INC.

I, Daniel T. McCloskey, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file this

Stipulation and [Proposed] Order to Stipulation And [Proposed] Order To Further Extend Parties’

Deadlines To File Briefs For Summary Judgment Motion And Sanctions Motion. In compliance with

General Order 45, X.B., I hereby attest that Michael D. Lisi has concurred in this filing.

Dated: June 5, 2007 By: /s/ Daniel T. McCloskey

Daniel T. McCloskey

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated:

HON. CHARLES R. BREYER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

Judge Charles R. Breyer

Case 3:05-cv-02732-CRB Document 192 Filed 06/08/07 Page 3 of 3