Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cr-00081/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cr-00081-7/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Claudiu Hotea
Defendant
USA
Plaintiff

Document Text:

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE STATUS 

CONFERENCE 

 CR 06-81 MCE 

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

JOSEPH J. WISEMAN, ESQ., CSBN 107403 

JOSEPH J. WISEMAN, P. C. 

 1477 Drew Avenue, Suite 106 

 Davis, California 95618 

 Telephone: 530.759.0700 

 Facsimile: 530.759.0800 

Attorney for Defendant 

CLAUDIU HOTEA 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SACRAMENTO DIVISION 

 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff, 

 vs. 

CLAUDIU HOTEA, 

 Defendants. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Case No. 2:06-cr-00081-MCE 

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO 

CONTINUE STATUS CONFERENCE 

 

It is hereby stipulated and agreed to between plaintiff, UNITED STATES OF 

AMERICA, through its counsel of record, Matthew D. Segal, Assistant United States Attorney, 

and defendant, CLAUDIA HOTEA, through his counsel of record, Joseph J. Wiseman, that the 

status conference scheduled for May 17, 2007, at 9:00 a.m., be rescheduled to May 31, 2007, at 

9:00 a.m. 

The parties further stipulate and agree that an additional continuance is appropriate in this 

case and request that the time beginning may 17, 2007 and extending through May 31, 2007, be 

ordered excluded from the calculation of time under the Speedy Trial Act. The ends of justice 

will be served by the Court excluding such time, so that counsel for the Defendant may have 

reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due 

diligence. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(B)(iv). 

Case 2:06-cr-00081-MCE Document 32 Filed 05/17/07 Page 1 of 2
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE STATUS 

CONFERENCE 

 CR 06-81 MCE 

2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Specifically, defense counsel needs additional time to review the file he recently received 

from defendant’s previous retained lawyer. The parties submit that the interests of justice served 

by granting this continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a 

speedy trial. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(A). 

Dated: May 14, 2007 Respectfully submitted, 

 JOSEPH J. WISEMAN, P.C. 

 By: /s/ Joseph J. Wiseman

 JOSEPH J. WISEMAN 

 Attorney for Defendant 

 CLAUDIU HOTEA 

Dated: May 14, 2007 McGREGOR W. SCOTT 

 United States Attorney 

 

 By: /s/ Matthew D. Segal 

MATTHEW D. SEGAL, AUSA 

 Attorney for Plaintiff 

 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

 

ORDER 

 GOOD CAUSE HAVING BEEN SHOWN, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the 

status conference in the above-captioned case be continued to May 31, 2007 at 9:00 a.m. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT the time from the date of this Order to May 31, 2007 be 

excluded pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161(h)(8)(B)(iv) (reasonable time to prepare) and Local Rule 

T4. 

DATED: May 16, 2007 

__________________________________ 

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cr-00081-MCE Document 32 Filed 05/17/07 Page 2 of 2