Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-05225/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-05225-5/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Angoss Software Corporation
Defendant
Siebel Systems, Inc.
Plaintiff

Document Text:

MOTION FOR ENTRY OF ORDER PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER 

AUTHORIZING WITHDRAWAL OF SIEBEL SYSTEMS, 

INC.’S TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER BOND 

AND RELEASING SIEBEL ON THAT BOND FROM LIABILITY;

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Case No. 05-5224 BZ

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-1-

MICHAEL J. BETTINGER (CAL BAR NO. 122196)

RACHEL R. DAVIDSON (CAL BAR NO. 215517)

PRESTON GATES ELLIS LLP

55 Second Street, Suite 1700

San Francisco, California 94105

Phone: (415) 882-8200

Fax: (415) 882-8220

Attorneys for Defendant

SIEBEL SYSTEMS, INC.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

ANGOSS SOFTWARE CORPORATION,

Plaintiff,

vs.

SIEBEL SYSTEMS, INC.,

Defendant.

Case No. 05-5224 BZ

 (consolidated with Case No. 05-5225 BZ)

MOTION FOR ENTRY OF ORDER 

AUTHORIZING WITHDRAWAL OF 

SIEBEL SYSTEMS, INC.’S

TEMPORARY RESTRAINING 

ORDER BOND AND RELEASING

THE SURETY ON THAT BOND 

FROM LIABILITY;

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Siebel Systems, Inc. (“Siebel”) submits the following request for an entry of Order

authorizing the withdrawal of Siebel’s Temporary Restraining Order (“TRO”) bond and releasing 

Siebel from liability on that bond.

On December 12, 2005, Siebel moved for a TRO in the above entitled court. On December

22, 2005, the Court granted Siebel’s TRO. As a condition of granting Siebel’s TRO, Siebel was

required to post a bond in the amount of $25,000. A true and correct copy of the said bond is 

attached hereto as Exhibit 1 (“Injunction Bond”).

Pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure §995.360(b), the Injunction Bond can be

withdrawn from the file and returned if the bond is no longer in force and effect and the time which 

Case 3:05-cv-05224-BZ Document 50-1 Filed 06/22/2006 Page 1 of 2 Case 3:05-cv-05225-BZ Document 13 Filed 06/26/06 Page 1 of 2
MOTION FOR ENTRY OF ORDER PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER 

AUTHORIZING WITHDRAWAL OF SIEBEL SYSTEMS, 

INC.’S TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER BOND 

AND RELEASING SIEBEL ON THAT BOND FROM LIABILITY;

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Case No. 05-5224 BZ

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-2-

the liability on the bond may be enforced has expired. California Code of Civil Procedure §995.430 

further provides that a bond no longer remains in effect when the purpose for which the bond was 

given is satisfied or the purpose is abandoned without any liability having been incurred.

On April 25, 2006, Angoss and Siebel entered into a stipulation dismissing this action and 

the consolidated action and all of the claims asserted therein with prejudice, with each party bearing 

its own costs. The Court granted that stipulation dismissing this action and the consolidated action.

Since this action and the consolidated action have been dismissed, the purpose for which the 

Injunction Bond was given has expired and therefore, the Injunction Bond no longer remains in 

effect. Accordingly, Siebel requests that the Injunction Bond be withdrawn from the files in this 

case and returned by the Clerk of the Court to Siebel’s attorney of record, and that the surety thereon 

be released from liability under that Injunction Bond.

DATED: June 22, 2006 PRESTON GATES & ELLIS LLP

By_________/s/___________________

Rachel Davidson

 Attorneys Siebel Systems, Inc.

ORDER

Now therefore, with good cause appearing:

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AS FOLLOWS:

Siebel System’s Injunction Bond shall be withdrawn from the files in this case and returned 

by the Clerk of the Court to Siebel’s attorney of record, and that the surety on that Injunction Bond 

shall be released from liability thereunder.

IT IS SO ORDERED

Dated: , 2006

 Hon. Bernard Zimmerman

Case 3:05-cv-05224-BZ Document 50-1 Filed 06/22/2006 Page 2 of 2

6/26/ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Bernard Zimmerman

and no opposition filed.

Case 3:05-cv-05225-BZ Document 13 Filed 06/26/06 Page 2 of 2