Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-00222/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-00222-5/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
AtomicPark.com
Defendant
AtomicPark.com, LLC
Defendant
Coremetrics, Inc.
Plaintiff

Document Text:

Joint Stipulation and Proposed Order Of Conditional Dismissal– Case No. C 04-00222-EMC 1

D217-001\

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

GREGORY K. KLINGSGPORN, SBN 203649

MITCHELL HERZOG & KLINGSPORN

A Limited Liability Partnership

550 Hamilton Avenue, Suite 230

Palo Alto, CA 94301

Telephone: (650) 327-7476

Facsimile: (650) 327-7994

Attorneys for Plaintiff

COREMETRICS, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

COREMETRICS, INC., a Delaware corporation,

Plaintiff,

vs.

ATOMICPARK.COM, LLC a/k/a

ATOMICPARK.COM, and DOES 1 through 20,

inclusive,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO. C 04-00222-EMC

JOINT STIPULATION AND PROPOSED

ORDER OF CONDITIONAL DISMISSAL

Courtroom: C, 15th Floor

Judge: Magistrate Edward M. Chen

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(ii), plaintiff Coremetrics, Inc.

(“Coremetrics”) and defendant Atomicpark.com (“AtomicPark”) jointly submit this Stipulation and 

Proposed Order of Conditional Dismissal and request the Court to enter dismissal of this case but retain 

jurisdiction to enforce the parties’ settlement agreement.

STIPULATION

1. On December 8, 2003, Coremetrics filed a lawsuit against AtomicPark in the San Mateo 

County Superior Court and for related relief (the “Action”). The Action was transferred to this Court and 

assigned by consent of the parties to Magistrate Judge Edward M. Chen for all purposes.

2. On January 24, 2006, Coremetrics and AtomicPark, and their attorneys, attended a

Settlement Conference presided over by Magistrate Judge Bernard Zimmerman of the United States

Case 3:04-cv-00222-EMC Document 80 Filed 03/09/06 Page 1 of 3
Case 3:04-cv-00222-EMC Document 80 Filed 03/09/06 Page 2 of 3
Joint Stipulation and Proposed Order Of Conditional Dismissal– Case No. C 04-00222-EMC 3

D217-001\

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER OF CONDITIONAL DISMISSAL

This Court having reviewed the foregoing Stipulation, the action is dismissed without prejudice,

subject to the parties' full compliance with the Settlement Agreement And Mutual Release of Claims, with 

which the parties are hereby directed to comply. This Court retains jurisdiction to enforce the Settlement

Agreement And Mutual Release Of All Claims. The Clerk is directed to place the case on the Court's

inactive docket.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: ______________, 2006 ________________________________________________ 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

March 9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Edward M. Chen

Case 3:04-cv-00222-EMC Document 80 Filed 03/09/06 Page 3 of 3