Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-19-02481/USCOURTS-ca4-19-02481-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
D.C. Diamond Corporation
Debtor
Kevin R. McCarthy
Appellee
Tomislav Milic
Appellant

Document Text:

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-2481

In re: D.C. DIAMOND CORPORATION,

Debtor.

-------------------------------------

TOMISLAV MILIC,

Creditor - Appellant,

v.

KEVIN R. MCCARTHY, Chapter 7 Trustee,

Trustee - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at 

Alexandria. T. S. Ellis, III, Senior District Judge. (1:19-cv-01340-TSE-MSN)

Submitted: May 21, 2020 Decided: May 26, 2020

Before AGEE and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit 

Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Tomislav Milic, Appellant Pro Se. Kevin R. McCarthy, MCCARTHY & WHITE, PLLC, 

Vienna, Virginia, for Appellee. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 19-2481 Doc: 17 Filed: 05/26/2020 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Tomislav Milic appeals from the district court’s order dismissing as untimely his

appeal from the bankruptcy court’s order denying his motion to reconsider an order 

approving the sale of real property, vacating the order authorizing the trustee to employ a 

real estate company, and denying compensation to the real estate company. The district 

court dismissed Milic’s appeal for failure to timely file a notice of appeal. See Fed. R. 

Bankr. P. 8002; Bowles v. Russell, 551 U.S. 205, 214 (2007) (“[T]he timely filing of a 

notice of appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional requirement.”). We have reviewed the 

record and the district court’s order and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm 

for the reasons stated by the district court. Milic v. McCarthy, No. 1:19-cv-01340-TSEMSN (E.D. Va. Dec. 13, 2019). We deny the trustee’s motion to dismiss the appeal, and 

we dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

AFFIRMED

USCA4 Appeal: 19-2481 Doc: 17 Filed: 05/26/2020 Pg: 2 of 2