Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01366/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01366-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control
Defendant
City of Etna
Defendant
Ryder Klenk
Plaintiff
Brett Letendre
Defendant
Nathan Mendes
Defendant

Document Text:

1 

Stipulation to Extend Time to Answer Complaint

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Raymond R. Gates, Esq. (SBN 170240) 

Amanda L. Moyer, Esq. (SBN 344151) 

LAURIA TOKUNAGA GATES & LINN, LLP 

1755 Creekside Oaks Drive, Suite 240 

Sacramento, California 95833 

Telephone: 916-492-2000 

Facsimile: 916-492-2500 

Email: rgates@ltglaw.net

Email: amoyer@ltglaw.net

Attorneys for Defendant

NATHAN MENDES

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RYDER KLENK, an individual;

Plaintiffs, 

vs.

CITY OF ETNA, a municipal corporation; 

NATHAN MENDES, individually and in his 

official capacity as a Police Officer for the CITY 

OF ETNA; BRETT LETENDRE, individually 

and in his official capacity as an agent for 

California Department of Alcoholic Beverage 

Control; and DOES 1-50, inclusive, individually, 

jointly, and severally,

Defendants.

CASE NO. 2:22-cv-01366-DAD-DMC

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR 

DEFENDANT NATHAN MENDES TO 

RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT; 

ORDER

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto through their respective 

attorneys that Defendant NATHAN MENDES may have an additional twenty-one (21) days within 

which to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff RYDER KLENK’S complaint. Defendant’s response 

is currently due June 7, 2023. 

Good cause exists for this extension as counsel have met and conferred regarding Plaintiff’s 

Second Amended Complaint and Plaintiff’s proposed draft of a Third Amended Complaint. After review 

and discussion, Defendant currently still intends to file a Motion to Dismiss as to some of the causes of 

action in the Second Amended Complaint; however, both parties wish to further meet and confer and 

Case 2:22-cv-01366-DAD-DMC Document 41 Filed 06/07/23 Page 1 of 3
2 

Stipulation to Extend Time to Answer Complaint

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

hope to resolve the issues prior to Defendant filing a Motion to Dismiss. 

Given the above, Defendant now requests a further extension of time to respond to the Second 

Amended Complaint to allow time for the Parties to further meet and confer. 

This document is being filed electronically through the Court’s ECF system. In this regard, 

counsel for Defendant hereby attests that (1) the contents of this document are acceptable to all persons 

required to sign the document; and (2) Plaintiff’s counsel has concurred with the filing of this document. 

Respectfully submitted,

Dated: June 6, 2023 LAURIA TOKUNAGA GATES & LINN, LLP

 By: /S/: AMANDA L. MOYER, ESQ.

 RAYMOND R. GATES, ESQ. 

 AMANDA L. MOYER, ESQ.

 Attorneys for Defendant 

 NATHAN MENDES

Dated: June 6, 2023 LAW OFFICES OF JOHN L. BURRIS

 By: /S/: JAMES COOK, ESQ. 

 JOHN L. BURRIS, ESQ.

 JAMES COOK, ESQ. 

 Attorneys for Plaintiff 

 RYDER KLENK

Case 2:22-cv-01366-DAD-DMC Document 41 Filed 06/07/23 Page 2 of 3
3 

Stipulation to Extend Time to Answer Complaint

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Pursuant to the parties’ stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED. Defendant NATHAN MENDES 

should answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint on or before June 28, 2023. 

Dated: June 6, 2023 

____________________________________ 

DENNIS M. COTA

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

 

Case 2:22-cv-01366-DAD-DMC Document 41 Filed 06/07/23 Page 3 of 3