Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-arwd-1_24-cv-01009/USCOURTS-arwd-1_24-cv-01009-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Harmony Grove School District
Defendant
Angelia Williams
Plaintiff

Document Text:

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS

EL DORADO DIVISION

ANGELIA WILLIAMS PLAINTIFF

v. Case No. 1:24-cv-01009

HARMONY GROVE 

SCHOOL DISTRICT DEFENDANT

ORDER

Before the Court is Plaintiff Angelia Williams’ (“Plaintiff”) Motion to Compel. (ECF No. 

14). Defendant Harmony Grove School District (“Defendant”) has responded. (ECF No. 15). 

The Court finds the matter ripe for consideration.

On September 18, 2024, Plaintiff sent Defendant the first set of interrogatories and 

requests for production. (ECF No. 14, at 1). On October 15, 2024, Plaintiff received 

Defendant’s responses to the interrogatories and production requests. (ECF No. 14, at 1). 

Plaintiff contends that some of Defendant’s responses were incomplete, and that further 

information was required. (ECF No. 14, at 1). On November 11, 2024, Plaintiff filed the instant 

motion. (ECF No. 15). 

In the motion, Plaintiff requests more information on Interrogatory ten (10), Interrogatory 

fifteen (15), and Request for Production twelve (12). (ECF No. 14, at 2). In regard to 

Interrogatory ten (10), Plaintiff requests the job title and date of termination for a district 

employee. (ECF No. 14, at 2). In regard to Interrogatory fifteen (15), Plaintiff requests more 

information related to any confidential Equal Employment Opportunity Commission charges or 

grievances filed internally with Defendant. (ECF No. 14, at 2). In regard to Request for 

Case 1:24-cv-01009-SOH Document 23 Filed 01/10/25 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:

<pageID>
2

Production twelve (12), Plaintiff again requests that Defendant provide any emails containing the 

expletives “fuck” or “fucking.” (ECF No. 14, at 2). 

On November 19, 2024, Defendant responded and provided supplemental responses to 

Plaintiff’s inquires. (ECF No. 15). In its supplemental response to Interrogatory ten (10), 

Defendant provides the district employee’s job title and date of termination. (ECF No. 15-1, at 

1). Its supplemental response to Interrogatory fifteen (15) states that it is only aware of the 

instant case, along with the corresponding Office for Civil Rights complaint, by Plaintiff and a 

desegregation case for which Defendant is a party. (ECF No. 15-1, at 2). Lastly, Defendant’s 

supplemental response to Request for Production twelve (12) states that it has now provided 

seventy-one pages of responsive documents that contain the requested two expletives.1

 (ECF 

No. 15-1, at 3). 

Plaintiff has not filed a reply to Defendant’s response or otherwise indicated if she is

satisfied with the supplemental responses. However, upon review of Defendant’s response, it 

appears to the Court that Defendant has provided the information that Plaintiff requested. 

Accordingly, Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel (ECF No. 14) is hereby DENIED AS MOOT in light 

of Defendant’s supplemental responses.

IT IS SO ORDERED, this 10th day of January, 2025.

/s/ Susan O. Hickey 

Susan O. Hickey

Chief United States District Judge

1

The parties appear to have narrowed the search terms requested in Request for Production twelve (12) to just 

the two swear words via an email dated October 25, 2024. “I am requesting Defendant waive this objection 

and provide any responsive email records containing the cuss words ‘fuck’ or ‘fucking,’ if such records exist . . 

. .” (ECF No. 14-3, at 3). 

Case 1:24-cv-01009-SOH Document 23 Filed 01/10/25 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:

<pageID>