Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-mc-80270/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-mc-80270-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Maxcrest Limited
Petitioner
United States of America
Respondent

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MAXCREST LIMITED,

Petitioner,

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Respondent.

Case No. 15-mc-80270-JST 

ORDER VACATING HEARING

Re: ECF Nos. 38, 43

Before the Court are Petitioner Maxcrest Limited’s Motion for De Novo Determination of 

Dispositive Matter Referred to Magistrate Judge, ECF No. 38, and Respondent United States’

Motion to Dismiss Amended Petition, ECF No. 43. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 

78(b) and Civil Local Rule 7-1(b), the Court finds the matters suitable for disposition without oral 

argument. The hearings, currently scheduled for June 16, 2016, are hereby VACATED.

If, however, any party advises the Court in writing by no later than two days from the date 

of this Order that most or all of the argument for its side will be conducted by a lawyer who has 

been licensed to practice law for five or fewer years, and who has not previously presented 

argument before this Court, then the Court will reschedule the hearing at a time that is convenient 

to all parties in order to provide that opportunity. Counsel shall confer with each other, and the 

party requesting the rescheduling of the hearing shall identify the upcoming available dates on the 

Court’s calendar at which all counsel are available for the hearing.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 7, 2016

_____________________________________

JON S. TIGAR

United States District Judge

Case 3:15-mc-80270-JST Document 48 Filed 06/07/16 Page 1 of 1