Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-01529/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-01529-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Tom L. Carey
Defendant
Clarence Montgomery
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

United States District Court

Eastern District of California 

Clarence Montgomery,

Plaintiff, No. Civ. S 04-1529 LKK PAN P

vs. Findings and Recommendations

Tom L. Carey,

Defendant.

-oOoPlaintiff is a state prisoner without counsel prosecuting a

civil rights action. 

March 17, 2005, the court ordered plaintiff to submit

materials for service of process upon defendant within 30 days. 

He did not. May 11, 2005, the court ordered plaintiff to show

cause why this action should not be dismissed for failure to

serve process. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m). Plaintiff did not

respond. 

Accordingly, I hereby recommend this action be dismissed

Case 2:04-cv-01529-LKK -PAN Document 5 Filed 07/07/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

without prejudice. Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m). 

Pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l), these

findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States

District Judge assigned to this case. Written objections may be

filed within 20 days of service of these findings and

recommendations. The document should be captioned “Objections to

Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” The district

judge may accept, reject, or modify these findings and

recommendations in whole or in part.

Dated: July 7, 2005. 

 /s/ Peter A. Nowinski 

 PETER A. NOWINSKI

 Magistrate Judge

Case 2:04-cv-01529-LKK -PAN Document 5 Filed 07/07/05 Page 2 of 2