Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-01395/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-01395-3/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Michael J. Astrue
Defendant
Suzie Steen
Plaintiff

Document Text:

STEEN v. ASTRUE, Stipulation and Order re Extension - 1 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

David J. Linden 

Attorney at Law 

CSBN 41221 

Post Office Box 5780 

Napa, CA 94581-0780 

Tel. (707) 252-7007 

Fax. (707) 252-7883 

Email: djl7007@sbcglobal.net 

Attorney for Plaintiff, Suzie Steen 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

SUZIE STEEN, 

 Plaintiff, 

 vs. 

MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner 

 of Social Security, 

 Defendant. 

Case No.: C-07 1395 SC 

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR 

EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE 

PLAINTIFF’S REPLY 

 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by the undersigned for the respective parties, subject to 

the approval of the Court, that Plaintiff shall have a fourteen-day extension of time in which to 

file her reply to Defendant’s Notice, Motion and Memorandum in Support of Cross-Motion for 

Summary Judgment and in Opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion of Summary Judgment or Remand. 

Plaintiff’s Reply was to be filed by February 6, 2008 pursuant to the Court’s Procedural Order 

for Social Security Review Actions. With this extension Plaintiff’s Reply is due by February 20, 

2008. 

Case 3:07-cv-01395-SC Document 22 Filed 01/24/08 Page 1 of 2
STEEN v. ASTRUE, Stipulation and Order re Extension - 2 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

// 

Dated: January 24, 2008 /s/ David J. Linden

 DAVID J. LINDEN 

 Attorney for Plaintiff 

 SCOTT N. SCHOOLS 

 United States Attorney 

Dated: January 24, 2008 /s/ Elizabeth Firer 

 (As authorized via e-mail on January 23, 2008) 

 ELIZABETH FIRER 

 Special Assistant U.S. Attorney 

 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. Plaintiff shall have an 

additional fourteen days in which to file her Reply, up to an including February 20, 2008. 

Dated: 

 SAMUEL CONTI 

 United States District Judge 

// 

// 

1/24/08

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Samuel Conti

Case 3:07-cv-01395-SC Document 22 Filed 01/24/08 Page 2 of 2