Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-00497/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-00497-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Pennsylvania Life Insurance Company
Defendant
Sharon Wilson-Gregory
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 1 

 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND DATES IN PRE-TRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER

B. ROSS BOZARTH (SB#179171)

GUENARD & BOZARTH

1810 S Street

Sacramento, CA 95814

Tel: (916) 447-7177

DAVID I. LIPSKY (SB#51009) OK/HAV

WALDRON & OLSON, LLP

26 Corporate Plaza Drive, Suite 100

Newport Beach, CA 92660-7901

Tel: (949)760-0204

Attorneys for Plaintiff Sharon Wilson-Gregory

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SHARON WILSON-GREGORY, an

individual,

Plaintiff,

v.

PENNSYLVANIA LIFE INSURANCE

COMPANY et al.,

Defendants. 

_________________________________/

CASE NO.: CV-05-497-DFL-KJM

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]

ORDER TO EXTEND DATES IN

PRE-TRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER

[F.R.C.P. 26 (a) (2)]

 

It is hereby stipulated by and between plaintiff Sharon Wilson-Gregory and defendant

Pennsylvania Life Insurance Company, through their respective attorneys of record, to extend the 

following dates set forth in the Status (Pre-Trial Scheduling) Order dated May 19, 2005: 

Expert Witness Disclosure: Extend to December 9, 2005

Supplemental Expert Witness Disclosure: Extend to December 16, 2005

Discovery Completion: Extend to February 24, 2006

Dispositive Motions: Extend filing deadline to April 12, 2006

Hearing on Dispositive Motions: Extend to May 10, 2006, at 10:00 a.m.

Joint Pre-Trial Statement: Extend due date to June 16, 2006

Case 2:05-cv-00497-DFL -KJM Document 14 Filed 09/19/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 2 

 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND DATES IN PRE-TRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER

Pre-Trial Conference: Extend to June 23, 2006, at 2:00 p.m.

Trial: Extend to July 24, 2006

The above extensions of time are necessary because, among other things, plaintiff has

been unable to obtain an early appointment with a medical provider that she deems material to her

claims, and as a consequence all medical records are not yet available, making it difficult to retain

experts as of this date. In the meantime, the parties have been cooperating with each other,

conducting discovery, and have scheduled an early mediation in an effort to commence early and

meaningful settlement discussions. 

Respectfully submitted,

Dated: September 13, 2005 GUENARD & BOZARTH, LLP

WALDRON & OLSON, LLP

 By: s/B. Ross Bozarth 

Ross Bozarth, Attorneys for Plaintiff

Dated: September 13, 2005 EZER WILLIAMSON & BROWN LLP

 By: s/Richard Williamson 

Richard E. Williamson, Attorneys for

Defendant

The Court, having reviewed the parties’ Stipulation to Extend Dates in Pre-Trial

Scheduling Order, and finding good cause, hereby orders that the dates be extended as stipulated.

IT IS SO ORDERED ON THIS 16 DAY OF September, 2005.

DAVID F. LEVI

United States District Judge

Case 2:05-cv-00497-DFL -KJM Document 14 Filed 09/19/05 Page 2 of 2