Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca5-02-41691/USCOURTS-ca5-02-41691-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Jose Guadalupe Espinoza-Cardenas
Appellant
United States of America
Appellee

Document Text:

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

February 18, 2004

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 02-41691

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JOSE GUADALUPE ESPINOZA-CARDENAS,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. L-02-CR-711-ALL

--------------------

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, EMILIO M. GARZA, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Jose Guadalupe Espinoza-Cardenas pleaded guilty to one count

of illegal entry into the United States in violation of 8 U.S.C.

§ 1325. He was sentenced to eight months of imprisonment and

one year of supervised release. Espinoza-Cardenas argues that

there is a conflict between the written and oral judgments. 

The written judgment contains a condition of supervised release

prohibiting the possession of a dangerous weapon; the oral

pronouncement of sentence did not mention this provision. 

 Case: 02-41691 Document: 00517117 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/18/2004
No. 02-41691

-2-

For the reasons outlined in United States v. Torres-Aguilar,

352 F.3d 934, 935-38 (5th Cir. 2003), we conclude that the

district court’s omission of the dangerous weapon prohibition

during the oral pronouncement of sentence did not create a

conflict with the sentence set forth in the judgment. 

AFFIRMED.

 Case: 02-41691 Document: 00517117 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/18/2004