Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_16-cv-01862/USCOURTS-caed-2_16-cv-01862-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Brenna Callahan
Plaintiff
Pinnacle Property Management Services Pier 70
Defendant
Pinnacle Property Management Services, LLC
Defendant

Document Text:

PARTIES STIPULATION TO WITHDRAW THE MOTION TO REMAND; ORDER CASE NO. 2:16-cv-01862-MCE-EFB 1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Galen T. Shimoda (Cal. State Bar No. 226752)

Justin P. Rodriguez (Cal. State Bar No. 278275)

Erika R. C. Sembrano (Cal. State Bar No. 306635)

Shimoda Law Corp.

9401 East Stockton Blvd. Suite 200

Elk Grove, CA 95624

Telephone: (916) 525-0716

Facsimile: (916) 760-3733

E-mail:attorney@shimodalaw.com

jrodriguez@shimodalaw.com

esembrano@shimodalaw.com

Attorneys for Plaintiff BRENNA CALLAHAN

JACKSON LEWIS P.C.

JAMES JONES (SBN 167967)

JOHNNY A COLON (SBN 294447)

400 Capitol Mall, Suite 1600

Sacramento, CA 95814

Telephone: (916) 341-0404

Facsimile: (916) 314-0141

Email: JonesJ@jacksonlewis.com

colonj@jacksonlewis.com

Attorneys for Defendants

PINNACLE PROPERTY MANAGEMENT

SERVICES, LLC and PINNACLE PROPERTY

MANAGEMENT SERVICES PIER 70

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BRENNA CALLAHAN,

Plaintiff,

 vs.

PINNACLE PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 

SERVICES, LLC, a Delaware Limited 

Liability Company; PINNACLE PROPERTY 

MANAGEMENT SERVICES PIER 70, a 

business organization, form unknown; and 

DOES 1 to 100, inclusive,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 2:16-cv-01862-MCE-EFB

STIPULATION REGARDING MOTION TO 

REMAND; ORDER 

Case 2:16-cv-01862-MCE-EFB Document 11 Filed 09/13/16 Page 1 of 3
PARTIES STIPULATION TO WITHDRAW THE MOTION TO REMAND; ORDER CASE NO. 2:16-cv-01862-MCE-EFB 2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 WHEREAS, PINNACLE PROPERTY MANAGEMENT SERVICES, LLC and PINNACLE 

PROPERTY MANAGEMENT SERVICES PIER 70 (collectively referred to as Defendants) filed its 

Notice of Removal in this Court on August 5, 2016;

WHEREAS, Plaintiff filed her Motion to Remand with the Court on August 23, 2016, and 

scheduled a hearing on September 22, 2016, based on Plaintiff’s belief there was a procedural defect of 

Defendants’ Notice of Removal;

WHEREAS, the Parties recognize that Plaintiff filed its Motion to Remand within 30 days of the 

Notice or Removal, thus its motion being timely under federal procedural law;

WHEREAS, the Parties seek to resolve their differences and attempt settlement of this case 

without incurring additional fees and costs; and

WHEREAS, the Parties agree to withdraw Plaintiff’s Motion to Remand so that further 

settlement discussions can occur.

//

//

//

//

//

//

//

//

//

//

//

//

//

//

//

//

Case 2:16-cv-01862-MCE-EFB Document 11 Filed 09/13/16 Page 2 of 3
PARTIES STIPULATION TO WITHDRAW THE MOTION TO REMAND; ORDER CASE NO. 2:16-cv-01862-MCE-EFB 3

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

THEREFORE, the parties hereby stipulate that the Motion to Remand the Action to State Court 

be removed from calendar; and that Plaintiff’s right to file a Motion to Remand, again, will not be 

prejudiced in any way if they are unable to resolve this case. The withdrawal of the Motion to Remand 

will not waive Plaintiff’s right to bring this motion under federal procedural law and Defendant will be 

estopped from arguing untimeliness of the Motion to Remand should it be filed again. 

Dated: September 12, 2016 Shimoda Law Corp.

By: /s/ Galen T. Shimoda

Galen T. Shimoda

Erika R. C. Sembrano

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

Dated: September 12, 2016 JACKSON LEWIS P.C.

By: /s/ James T. Jones

JAMES T. JONES

(approved on 9/6/2016)

JOHNNY A. COLÓN

Attorneys for Defendants

PINNACLE PROPERTY MANAGEMENT

SERVICES, LLC and PINNACLE PROPERTY

MANAGEMENT SERVICES PIER 70

Based on the foregoing stipulation and in order to facilitate settlement between the parties, 

Plaintiff’s Motion to Remand (ECF No. 6), previously scheduled to be heard on September 22, 2016, 

will be removed from calendar.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 12, 2016

Case 2:16-cv-01862-MCE-EFB Document 11 Filed 09/13/16 Page 3 of 3