Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-arwd-5_05-cv-05211/USCOURTS-arwd-5_05-cv-05211-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Rhonda Bradley
Defendant
Donahue
Defendant
Shannon L. Herren
Plaintiff

Document Text:

AO72A

(Rev. 8/82)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS

FAYETTEVILLE DIVISION

SHANNON L. HERREN PLAINTIFF

v. Civil No. 05-5211

 

DEPUTY DONAHUE; and

NURSE RHONDA BRADLEY DEFENDANTS

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Plaintiff, Shannon L. Herren, filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on

December 30, 2005. Herren proceeds in forma pauperis and pro se.

On February 17, 2006, Herren filed a motion to dismiss the case (Doc. 13). In the motion,

Herren indicates she no longer wishes to pursue the case. 

On February 22, 2006, the defendants filed a response to the motion to dismiss (Doc. 14).

Defendants indicate they have no objection to the dismissal of the action.

Accordingly, I recommend that the plaintiff’s motion to voluntarily dismiss this action be

granted. The parties have ten days from receipt of the report and recommendation in which

to file written objections pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). The failure to file timely

objections may result in waiver of the right to appeal questions of fact. The parties are

reminded that objections must be both timely and specific to trigger de novo review by the

district court.

Dated this 2nd day of March 2006.

/s/ Beverly Stites Jones 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

 

Case 5:05-cv-05211-JLH Document 15 Filed 03/02/06 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: <pageID>