Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-09-02374/USCOURTS-ca4-09-02374-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Ewin Henriques
Petitioner

Document Text:

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-2374

In Re: EWIN HENRIQUES,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.

(3:97-cv-00078-MR; 3:93-cr-00089-MR-1)

Submitted: March 30, 2010 Decided: April 2, 2010

Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ewin Henriques, Petitioner Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 09-2374 Doc: 8 Filed: 04/02/2010 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Ewin Henriques petitions for a writ of mandamus, 

alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his

Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion filed in his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 

(West Supp. 2009) proceeding. He seeks an order from this court 

directing the district court to act. Our review of the docket 

sheet reveals that the district court denied the motion on 

January 15, 2010. Accordingly, because the district court has 

recently decided Henriques’s case, we deny the mandamus petition 

as moot. We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We deny 

Henriques’s motion for a certificate of appealability. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

PETITION DENIED

Appeal: 09-2374 Doc: 8 Filed: 04/02/2010 Pg: 2 of 2