Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caDC-16-07080/USCOURTS-caDC-16-07080-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Government of the District of Columbia
Appellee
Roman Tiffer
Appellant

Document Text:

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

____________

No. 16-7080 September Term, 2016

1:16-cv-01117-UNA

Filed On: December 1, 2016

Roman Tiffer,

Appellant

v.

Government of the District of Columbia,

Office of the Chief Financial Officer, Office of

Tax and Revenue,

Appellee

ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

BEFORE: Srinivasan and Wilkins, Circuit Judges,

and Ginsburg, Senior Circuit Judge

J U D G M E N T

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court

for the District of Columbia and on the brief filed by appellant. See Fed. R. App. P.

34(a)(2); D.C. Cir. Rule 34(j). It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s order filed June 15, 2016

be affirmed. The district court properly dismissed appellant’s complaint without

prejudice for failure to comply with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8(a), which requires

“a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief”

and “a demand for the relief sought.”

USCA Case #16-7080 Document #1648672 Filed: 12/01/2016 Page 1 of 2
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

____________

No. 16-7080 September Term, 2016

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk

is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution

of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R. App.

P. 41(b); D.C. Cir. Rule 41.

Per Curiam

FOR THE COURT:

Mark J. Langer, Clerk 

BY: /s/

Ken Meadows 

Deputy Clerk

2

USCA Case #16-7080 Document #1648672 Filed: 12/01/2016 Page 2 of 2