Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_03-cv-06586/USCOURTS-caed-1_03-cv-06586-6/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Himax Furniture Industry Corporation, Ltd
Defendant
Royal Specialty Underwriting, Inc.,
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ROYAL SPECIALTY UNDERWRITING, )

)

Plaintiff, )

v. )

)

HIMAX FURNITURE INDUSTRY )

CORPORATION, Ltd., )

)

Defendant. )

)

 )

1: 03-CV-6586 OWW SMS

ORDER RE: FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS TO GRANT

PLAINTIFF’S APPLICATION FOR

DEFAULT JUDGMENT AGAINST

DEFENDANT HIMAX FURNITURE

INDUSTRY CORPORATION, LTD. (DOC.

35)

ORDER DIRECTING THE ENTRY OF

JUDGMENT

Plaintiff is proceeding with a civil action in this Court.

The matter has been referred to the Magistrate Judge pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Local Rule 72-302(c)(19). Pending before

the Court are Plaintiff’s application for default judgment

against Defendant Himax Furniture Industry Corporation, Ltd.

On November 18, 2005, the Magistrate Judge filed findings

and a recommendation that Plaintiff’s application for default

judgment against Defendant Himax Furniture Industry Corporation,

Ltd., be granted. The findings and recommendation were served on

all parties on November 18, 2005, and contained notice that any

objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed

Case 1:03-cv-06586-OWW -SMS Document 48 Filed 01/10/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

within thirty (30) days of the date of service of the order. No

party has filed any objections.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636

(b)(1)(C) and Britt v. Simi Valley United School Dist., 708 F.2d

452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983), this Court has conducted a de novo

review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file,

the Court finds that the report and recommendation are supported

by the record and proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendation filed November 18, 2005,

are ADOPTED IN FULL; and

2. Plaintiff’s motion for entry of a default judgment BE

GRANTED in part; and

3. The Clerk BE DIRECTED to enter judgment in favor of

Plaintiff Royal Specialty Underwriting, Inc., and against

Defendant Himax Furniture Industry Corporation, Ltd., for

damages, consisting of $125,000.00 spent in settlement of the

state court action and $12,350.20 in expenses in the state

action; and for costs in this action in the amount of $1181.12.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 3, 2006 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger 

emm0d6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:03-cv-06586-OWW -SMS Document 48 Filed 01/10/06 Page 2 of 2