Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-01635/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-01635-4/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Jesse T. Moten
Petitioner
Jeanne Woodford
Respondent

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JESSE T. MOTEN, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

 v. )

)

JEANNE WOODFORD, )

)

Respondent. )

____________________________________)

1:05-cv-01635-OWW-TAG HC

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND

RECOMMENDATION

(Doc. 6)

ORDER DISMISSING PETITION FOR

WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

(Doc. 1)

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT

TO ENTER JUDGMENT

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in a habeas corpus action pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 2254. 

On September 13, 2006, the Court issued a Report and Recommendation to dismiss the

instant petition. (Doc. 20). In that Report and Recommendation, the Court gave the parties thirty

days within which to object to the Court’s Recommendation. On October 20, 2006, Petitioner

requested an extension of time within which to file his objections. (Doc. 21). On October 20, 2006,

the Court granted Petitioner an additional thirty days in which to file objections, or until December 1,

2006. On November 15, 2006, and again on November 27, 2006, Petitioner filed objections. (Docs.

23 & 24). 

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a de

novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, including Petitioner's objections,

the Court concludes that the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation is supported by the

Case 1:05-cv-01635-OWW -TAG Document 25 Filed 12/15/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

record and proper analysis. Petitioner's objections present no grounds for questioning the Magistrate

Judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Report and Recommendation issued September 13, 2006 (Doc. 20), is ADOPTED IN

FULL; 

2. The petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. 1), is DISMISSED; and

3. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to ENTER JUDGMENT for Respondent and close the

file.

This order terminates the action in its entirety.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: December 14, 2006 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger 

emm0d6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:05-cv-01635-OWW -TAG Document 25 Filed 12/15/06 Page 2 of 2