Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_09-cv-01388/USCOURTS-cand-4_09-cv-01388-6/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Particle Measuring Systems, Inc.
Defendant
Aleksandr L. Yufa
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

DEFENDANT PARTICLE MEASURING SYSTEMS, INC.’S

REPLY TO RESPONSE TO MOTION FOR STAY

CIVIL CASE NO. 3:09-01388 PJH

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

James A. Jablonski (Cal. Bar No. 043839)

LAW OFFICE OF JAMES A. JABLONSKI

1801 Broadway, Suite 1100

Denver, CO 80202

Telephone: 303-292-0110

Facsimile: 303-292-0522

Attorney for Defendant

Particle Measuring Systems, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

ALEKSANDR L. YUFA,

Plaintiff,

v.

PARTICLE MEASURING SYSTEMS, INC.,

Defendant

Case No.: 3:09-01388 PJH

Judge Phyllis J Hamilton

STIPULATION FOR ADDITIONAL STAY 

Date: 

Time:.

Ctrm: 3

The parties hereby submit this Stipulation for Additional Stay as follows:

1. This Court issued a Stay in the case until July 31, 2014 on the ground that other similar 

patent cases brought by Dr. Yufa were further advanced and that the Court and the 

Parties could benefit from resolution of similar issues in those cases. Doc. 68. 

2. The three sister cases referenced have in fact been the subject of additional action, 

including in one, the granting of summary judgment in favor of Lockheed Martin. Dr. 

Yufa has filed an appeal in the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (#2014-

1256). 

3. In Yufa v Hach Ultra, 09-cv-3022, D. Oregon, (Doc. 105) there has been a ruling 

granting summary judgment for defendant on the grounds of issue preclusion, Yufa 

being essentially bound by results in other cases. Dr. Yufa filed a Notice of Appeal. 

AND ORDER

Case 4:09-cv-01388-PJH Document 71 Filed 07/21/14 Page 1 of 3
2

DEFENDANT PARTICLE MEASURING SYSTEMS, INC.’S

REPLY TO RESPONSE TO MOTION FOR STAY

CIVIL CASE NO. 3:09-01388 PJH

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

4. In Yufa v. TSI Inc. 09-01315, N.D. Cal (Doc. 176) there has been summary judgment 

for defendant on the ground of non infringement. Dr. Yufa filed an Appeal (#2014-

1539).

5. In Yufa v. Lighthouse Worldwide Solutions, the Defendant’s Motion For Summary 

Judgment was denied. (Doc. 104)

6. Dr. Yufa is seeking to overturn or have those rulings modified. Defendant Particle 

Measuring Systems is willing to wait another four months. At that time it will seek to 

pursue an immediate summary judgment on the same basis granted elsewhere. Dr. Yufa 

will oppose any summary judgment of Particle Measuring System, Inc.

7. For the reasons stated the parties stipulate to the entry of an additional stay until 

December 31, 2014. 

 

 Respectfully submitted,

DATED: July 17, 2014

LAW OFFICE OF JAMES A. JABLONSKI

/s James A. Jablonski 

By: ____

James A. Jablonski

Attorney for Defendant

Particle Measuring Systems, Inc.

July 17,2014 By: /s Alexsandr Yufa 

------------------------------ 

Aleksandr L. Yufa Ph. D 

Plaintiff in Pro Se 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, James A. Jablonski, declare:

8. A case management conference will be held on January 22, 2015 at 2:00 p.m. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton

7/21/14

Case 4:09-cv-01388-PJH Document 71 Filed 07/21/14 Page 2 of 3
3

DEFENDANT PARTICLE MEASURING SYSTEMS, INC.’S

REPLY TO RESPONSE TO MOTION FOR STAY

CIVIL CASE NO. 3:09-01388 PJH

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

I am a resident of the State of Colorado and over the age of eighteen year. I am not a 

party to the within action. My business address is 1801 Broadway, Suite 1100, Denver, CO 

80202. On January 31, 2014, I served the within documents:

STIPULATION FOR ADDITIONAL STAY 

X By U.S. MAIL: by placing the document listed above in a sealed envelope 

with postage thereon fully prepaid, in the United States mail at Denver, Colorado, addressed as 

set forth below. I am readily familiar with the firm’s practice of collecting and processing 

correspondence for mailing. Under that practice it would be deposited with the U.S. Postal 

Service on that same day with postage thereon fully prepaid in the ordinary course of business. I 

am aware that on motion of the party served, service is presumed invalid if the postal 

cancellation date or postage meter date is more than one day after date of deposit for mailing in 

affidavit.

BY FACSIMILE: transmitting via facsimile machine the document(s) 

listed above to the fax number(s) set forth below on this date. The outgoing facsimile machine 

telephone number in this office is 303-292-0522.

On the following interested party in this action:

Aleksandr L. Yufa

698 Cypress Avenue

Colton, CA 92324

Fax: (909) 370-1714

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States that the above is 

true and correct.

Executed on July 17, 2014, at Denver, Colorado.

/s James A. Jablonski 

James A. Jablonski

Case 4:09-cv-01388-PJH Document 71 Filed 07/21/14 Page 3 of 3