Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_10-cv-00878/USCOURTS-caed-1_10-cv-00878-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Corcoran State Prison
Defendant
Fred King
Plaintiff
Walden House
Defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

FRED KING, CASE NO. 1:10CV00878 LJO SKO

Plaintiff, 

 

vs.

CORCORAN STATE PRISON

Defendant.

 

FRED KING, CASE NO. 1:10CV00879 OWW GSA

Plaintiff, 

 ORDER TO CONSOLIDATE to 

vs. CORRECT PLAINTIFF’S/FILING ERROR

WALDEN HOUSE

 /

The Court has received and reviewed the two above-captioned complaints. They are

identical allegations to-the-word. Plaintiff mistakenly filed two different actions, simply because

there were two named-defendants. There should have been only one complaint filed, with both

defendants named in the same caption.

The two complaints are ordered to be consolidated forthwith, and the first-filed complaint

will be the number used. The caption will read as follows:

Fred King v Corcoran State Prison; Walden House 

1:10-CV-00878 LJO/SKO 

By this ORDER, this Court makes no finding on the appropriateness of the defendants' being

named as parties.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 24, 2010 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill 

b9ed48 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

1

Case 1:10-cv-00878-LJO-SKO Document 5 Filed 05/25/10 Page 1 of 1