Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca10-07-01245/USCOURTS-ca10-07-01245-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Miguel Angel Guerra-Serna
Appellant
United States of America
Appellee

Document Text:

*

 This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the

doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. It may be cited,

however, for its persuasive value consistent with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 and 10th

Cir. R. 32.1.

** After examining the briefs and the appellate record, this three-judge

panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not be of material

assistance in the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th

Cir. R. 34.1(G). The cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

FILED

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

January 11, 2008

Elisabeth A. Shumaker

Clerk of Court

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

MIGUEL ANGEL GUERRA-SERNA,

Defendant - Appellant.

No. 07-1245

(D.C. No. 06-cr-489-EWN)

(D. Colo.)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

Before KELLY, ANDERSON, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.**

Defendant-Appellant Miguel Guerra-Serna pleaded guilty to reentry of a

deported alien previously convicted of an aggravated felony. See 8 U.S.C. §

1326(a) & (b)(2). The previous aggravated felony conviction was transporting

illegal aliens. Mr. Guerra-Serna was sentenced to 46 months’ imprisonment and

three years’ supervised release. On appeal, Mr. Guerra-Serna’s counsel has filed

Appellate Case: 07-1245 Document: 0101108080 Date Filed: 01/11/2008 Page: 1
2

an Anders brief because she identified no potentially meritorious issues for

appeal. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Mr. Guerra-Serna was

served with a copy of the Anders brief by counsel, and no response has been filed. 

Our jurisdiction arises under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and 18 U.S.C. § 3742(a), and we

dismiss the appeal and grant counsel’s motion to withdraw.

Following Mr. Guerra-Serna’s guilty plea, a presentence investigation

report (PSR) was prepared. The PSR calculated the applicable Guideline

sentencing range to be 46 to 57 months’ imprisonment given a total offense level

of 21, and a criminal history category of III. IV R Doc. 5, 12; III R. 4. At the

sentencing hearing, both counsel for Mr. Guerra-Serna and the government

recommended that the district court impose a sentence of 46 months’

imprisonment, the bottom of the Guideline range. III R. 3. 

We agree with Mr. Guerra-Serna’s counsel that no potentially meritorious

issues are present on appeal. First, there is no reason to believe that Mr. GuerraSerna’s plea was anything but knowing and voluntary. See Brady v. United

States, 397 U.S. 742, 755–56 (1970). Second, we agree with appellate counsel

that a claim that the sentence is substantively unreasonable (after considering the

severity of the crime and the § 3553(a) factors) is all but frivolous. There were

no objections to the PSR, and both the government and trial counsel

recommended a sentence at the low end of the applicable guideline range–exactly

what the court imposed. Be that as it may, the sentence is within the

Appellate Case: 07-1245 Document: 0101108080 Date Filed: 01/11/2008 Page: 2
3

presumptively reasonable Guideline range and no facts have been suggested to

rebut the presumption. See Rita v. United States, --- U.S. ---, 127 S. Ct. 2456,

2462–63 (2007); United States v. Kristl, 437 F.3d 1050, 1055 (10th Cir. 2006). 

Accordingly, we DISMISS this appeal and GRANT counsel’s motion to withdraw.

Entered for the Court

Paul J. Kelly, Jr.

Circuit Judge

Appellate Case: 07-1245 Document: 0101108080 Date Filed: 01/11/2008 Page: 3