Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_07-cv-05386/USCOURTS-cand-4_07-cv-05386-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
William Hernandez
Defendant
Christopher M. Killebrew
Plaintiff

Document Text:

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CHRISTOPHER M. KILLEBREW,

Plaintiff,

 v.

Captain DENNIS McQUEENY; FIRMA

STEWART; MARSHA GRANT, R.N.;

CHARLES PACMIGIANO, M.D.; PETER

VAUGHY, M.D., of Mental Health; AMY

HARRIS, Mental Health Staff; and

Sergeant WILLIAM HERNANDEZ; 

Defendants. /

No. C 07-5386 PJH (PR)

ORDER OF SERVICE AFTER

AMENDMENT

This is a civil rights case filed pro se by a prisoner who was formerly housed at the

Marin County Jail. In the initial review order the court noted that plaintiff had stated a claim

against defendant Hernandez, but not against the other defendants. The claims except for

those against Hernandez were dismissed with leave to amend. Plaintiff has not amended. 

As a result, the claims other than those against Hernandez will be dismissed without further

leave to amend. The claims against Hernandez will be served. 

CONCLUSION

1. Plaintiff's claims against all defendants except Hernandez are DISMISSED with

prejudice.

2. The clerk shall issue summons and serve, without prepayment of fees, copies of

the complaint and this order on defendant Sergeant William Hernandez. Plaintiff states that

the defendant can be found at the Marin County Jail. 

3. In order to expedite the resolution of this case, the court orders as follows:

a. Defendant shall file a motion for summary judgment or other dispositive

Case 4:07-cv-05386-PJH Document 6 Filed 06/16/08 Page 1 of 3
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

motion within sixty days of the date this order is entered. If defendant is of the opinion that

this case cannot be resolved by summary judgment, he shall so inform the court prior to the

date his summary judgment motion is due. 

b. Plaintiff's opposition to the dispositive motion, if any, shall be filed with the

court and served upon defendant no later than thirty days from the date the motion was

served upon him. Plaintiff must read the attached page headed “NOTICE -- WARNING,”

which is provided to him pursuant to Rand v. Rowland, 154 F.3d 952, 953-954 (9th Cir.

1998) (en banc), and Klingele v. Eikenberry, 849 F.2d 409, 411-12 (9th Cir. 1988).

If defendant files an unenumerated motion to dismiss claiming that plaintiff failed to

exhaust his available administrative remedies as required by 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a), plaintiff

should take note of the attached page headed “NOTICE -- WARNING (EXHAUSTION),”

which is provided to him as required by Wyatt v. Terhune, 315 F.3d 1108, 1120 n. 4 (9th

Cir. 2003).

c. If defendant wishes to file a reply brief, he shall do so no later than fifteen

days after service of the opposition. 

d. The motion shall be deemed submitted as of the date the reply brief is

due. No hearing will be held on the motion unless the court so orders at a later date. 

4. All communications by plaintiff with the court must be served on defendant, or

defendant’s counsel once counsel has been designated, by mailing a true copy of the

document to defendant or defendant’s counsel.

5. It is plaintiff's responsibility to prosecute this case. Plaintiff must keep the court

informed of any change of address and must comply with the court's orders in a timely

fashion. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of this action for failure to prosecute

pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 16, 2008. 

 PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON

United States District Judge

G:\PRO-SE\PJH\CR.07\KILLEBREW5386.SRV.wpd

Case 4:07-cv-05386-PJH Document 6 Filed 06/16/08 Page 2 of 3
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3

NOTICE -- WARNING (SUMMARY JUDGMENT)

If defendants move for summary judgment, they are seeking to have your case

dismissed. A motion for summary judgment under Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil

Procedure will, if granted, end your case.

Rule 56 tells you what you must do in order to oppose a motion for summary

judgment. Generally, summary judgment must be granted when there is no genuine issue

of material fact--that is, if there is no real dispute about any fact that would affect the result

of your case, the party who asked for summary judgment is entitled to judgment as a matter

of law, which will end your case. When a party you are suing makes a motion for summary

judgment that is properly supported by declarations (or other sworn testimony), you cannot

simply rely on what your complaint says. Instead, you must set out specific facts in

declarations, depositions, answers to interrogatories, or authenticated documents, as

provided in Rule 56(e), that contradict the facts shown in the defendant's declarations and

documents and show that there is a genuine issue of material fact for trial. If you do not

submit your own evidence in opposition, summary judgment, if appropriate, may be entered

against you. If summary judgment is granted, your case will be dismissed and there will be

no trial.

NOTICE -- WARNING (EXHAUSTION)

If defendants file an unenumerated motion to dismiss for failure to exhaust, they are

seeking to have your case dismissed. If the motion is granted it will end your case.

You have the right to present any evidence you may have which tends to show that

you did exhaust your administrative remedies. Such evidence may be in the form of

declarations (statements signed under penalty of perjury) or authenticated documents, that

is, documents accompanied by a declaration showing where they came from and why they

are authentic, or other sworn papers, such as answers to interrogatories or depositions. 

If defendants file a motion to dismiss and it is granted, your case will be dismissed

and there will be no trial. 

Case 4:07-cv-05386-PJH Document 6 Filed 06/16/08 Page 3 of 3