Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-02261/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-02261-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Kelly Pagidas
Defendant
Previvo Genetics, LLC
Plaintiff

Document Text:

JOINT STIP AND PROP’D ORDER FOR AN EXT OF TIME FOR PREVIVO TO FILE ITS OPPOSITION TO 

PAGIDAS MOTION TO DISMISS; MOTION TO TRANSFER 

Case No. 3:16-cv-02261-EMC 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Ahmed J. Davis / davis@fr.com

Admitted Pro Hac Vice 

Sarah M. Cork / cork@fr.com 

Admitted Pro Hac Vice 

FISH & RICHARDSON P.C. 

1425 K Street, N.W. 

Washington, DC 20005-3500 

Telephone: (202) 783-5070 

Facsimile: (202) 783-2331 

James Huguenin-Love (SBN 301297/ huguenin-love@fr.com) 

FISH & RICHARDSON P.C. 

500 Arguello Street, Suite 500 

Redwood City, California 94063 

Telephone: (650) 839-5070 

Facsimile: (650) 839-5071 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

PREVIVO GENETICS, LLC 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

PREVIVO GENETICS, LLC, 

 Plaintiff, 

v. 

KELLY PAGIDAS, 

 Defendant. 

Case No. 3:16-cv-02261 EMC 

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR 

PREVIVO TO FILE ITS OPPOSITION TO 

PAGIDAS’ MOTION TO DISMISS FOR 

LACK OF PERSONAL JURISDICTION, 

OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE MOTION TO 

TRANSFER TO THE DISTRICT OF 

RHODE ISLAND 

Hearing Date: September 22, 2016 

Time: 1:30p.m. 

Courtroom: 5 

Judge: Honorable Edward M. Chen

WHEREAS, on August 4, 2016, Defendant Kelly Pagidas (“Pagidas”) filed a Motion to 

Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction, or in the Alternative Motion to Transfer to the District 

of Rhode Island (“Motion”) (Dkt. No. 23). 

WHEREAS Plaintiff Previvo Genetics, LLC’s (“Previvo”) Opposition to the Motion is due 

on August 18, 2016 making Pagidas’ Reply to Previvo’s Opposition due on August 25, 2016. 

Case 3:16-cv-02261-EMC Document 29 Filed 08/16/16 Page 1 of 3
2 

JOINT STIP AND PROP’D ORDER FOR AN EXT OF TIME FOR PREVIVO TO FILE ITS OPPOSITION TO 

PAGIDAS MOTION TO DISMISS; MOTION TO TRANSFER 

Case No. 3:16-cv-02261-EMC 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WHEREAS the parties have agreed to extend the deadline for filing Previvo’s Opposition 

to the Motion to August 25, 2016 and Pagidas’ Reply to Previvo’s Opposition to September 7, 

2016. 

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the parties that Previvo 

may have an extension of time up to and including August 25, 2016 to file its Opposition to the 

Motion. Pagidas’ Reply to Previvo’s Opposition will be due on or before September 7, 2016. 

Dated: August 15, 2016 Respectfully submitted, 

FISH & RICHARDSON P.C. 

By: /s/ James Huguenin-Love 

 James Huguenin-Love 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

PREVIVO GENETICS, LLC 

Dated: August 15, 2016 ROBINS KAPLAN LLP 

By: /s/ David Leichtman

 David Leichtman 

Attorneys for Defendant 

KELLY PAGIDAS 

ATTESTATION

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3) regarding signatures, I attest that concurrence in the 

filing of this document has been obtained from the other signatories. 

Dated: August 15, 2016 FISH & RICHARDSON P.C. 

By: /s/ James Huguenin-Love 

 James Huguenin-Love 

Case 3:16-cv-02261-EMC Document 29 Filed 08/16/16 Page 2 of 3
3 

JOINT STIP AND PROP’D ORDER FOR AN EXT OF TIME FOR PREVIVO TO FILE ITS OPPOSITION TO 

PAGIDAS MOTION TO DISMISS; MOTION TO TRANSFER 

Case No. 3:16-cv-02261-EMC 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: 

By: 

 Honorable Edward M. Chen 

United States District Court Judge 

8/16/16

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Edward M. Chen

Case 3:16-cv-02261-EMC Document 29 Filed 08/16/16 Page 3 of 3