Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_09-cv-02107/USCOURTS-caed-2_09-cv-02107-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Citibank (South Dakota), N.A.
Defendant
Rosalee Hansen
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

LA 51278681

MAJORS & FOX LLP 

Frank J. Fox SBN139147(Ca.) 

Lawrence J. Salisbury SBN179748(Ca.) 

Andrew M. Greene SBN167386(Ca.) 

Jonathan L. Gerber SBN251219(Ca.) 

401 West "A" Street, Suite 2350 

San Diego, California 92101-7921 

Telephone: (619) 234-1000 

Facsimile: (619) 234-1011 

Emails: fjfox@majorfox.com; lsalisbu@majorfox.com; 

agreene@majorfox.com; jgerber@majorfox.com

[Other Counsel on Signature Page] 

Counsel for Plaintiff/Cross-Defendant Rosalee Hansen 

STROOCK & STROOCK & LAVAN LLP 

JULIA B. STRICKLAND (State Bar No. 083013) 

MARCOS D. SASSO (State Bar No. 228905) 

ERIC Y. HWANG (State Bar No. 258966) 

2029 Century Park East, Suite 1600 

Los Angeles, CA 90067-3086 

Telephone: 310-556-5800 

Facsimile: 310-556-5959

E-Mail: lacalendar@stroock.com

Attorneys for Defendant/Cross-Complainant 

CITIBANK (SOUTH DAKOTA), N.A. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

ROSALEE HANSEN, an individual, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

CITIBANK (SOUTH DAKOTA), N.A., and DOES 1 

through 100, inclusive, 

And Related Cross-Claim

Case No. 2:09-CV-02107-JAM-EFB 

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE TRIAL 

DATES AND TRIAL RELATED 

DATES; ORDER 

Date Filed: 02/02/2009 

Case No. CV 10-3076-JFW (RZx)

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 2:09-cv-02107-JAM-EFB Document 12 Filed 06/10/10 Page 1 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1 

LA 51278681

This Stipulation is entered into with respect to the following facts and circumstances: 

1. This action was filed on February 2, 2009, but then was removed to U.S. District 

Court on or about July 30, 2009; 

2. After the parties filed the Joint Status Report on or about September 28, 2009, the 

Court issued its Status (Pre-Trial Scheduling) Order, by which the Court set the trial date of this 

action for December 6, 2010; 

3. The Court's September 30, 2009, Status (Pre-trial Scheduling) Order also set the 

following dates: 

1) File Joint Mid-Lit Statement June 15, 2010 

2) Discovery Cutoff June 30, 2010 

3) File Dispositive Motions August 4, 2010 

 4) Dispositive Motion Hearing September 1, 2010; at 9:00 a.m. 

 5) Final Pre-Trial Conference October 22, 2010 

4. The parties have and continue to work cooperatively to complete discovery in order 

to permit the filing of dispositive motions. Unfortunately, in light of the many witnesses that do 

not reside in California, the difficulties of scheduling the depositions that need to be completed and 

the summer vacation plans of both the witnesses and counsel, it will be very difficult to complete 

the necessary discovery and file dispositive motions under the current schedule. 

5. Accordingly, the Parties jointly seek to continue all calendared dates for 

approximately 45 days from the currently scheduled dates or as soon thereafter as the Court's 

schedule allows. 

6. The Court has advised that the schedule may be amended as follows: 

 1) File Joint Mid-Lit Statement, July 26, 2010 

 2) Discovery Cutoff, August 16, 2010 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 2:09-cv-02107-JAM-EFB Document 12 Filed 06/10/10 Page 2 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

LA 51278681

 3) File Dispositive Motions, September 22, 2010; 

 4) Dispositive Motion Hearing, October 20, 2010 at 9:30 a.m.; 

 5) Final Pre-Trial Conference, December 17, 2010 at 3 p.m.; and 

 6) Trial, February 7, 2011 at 9:00 a.m. 

7. The parties have not previously sought a continuance of the dates in this action. 

Based on the foregoing facts and circumstances, and good cause appearing therefore, 

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED as follows: 

(1) The trial date and all other pretrial dates shall be continued approximately 45 days 

from the currently scheduled dates and the new schedule shall be as follows: 

 1) File Joint Mid-Lit Statement, July 26, 2010 

 2) Discovery Cutoff, August 16, 2010 

 3) File Dispositive Motions, September 22, 2010; 

 4) Dispositive Motion Hearing, October 20, 2010 at 9:30 a.m.; 

 5) Final Pre-Trial Conference, December 17, 2010 at 3 p.m.; and 

 6) Trial, February 7, 2011 at 9:00 a.m. 

Dated: June 8, 2010 MAJORS & FOX LLP 

By: /s/ 

Frank Fox 

AULT & ROBINSON, A.P.C. 

LINDA S. ROBINSON 

DAVID W. AULT 

COUNTY OF EL DORADO 

A.L. HAMILTON 

Attorneys for Plaintiff/Cross-Defendant 

ROSALEE HANSEN

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 2:09-cv-02107-JAM-EFB Document 12 Filed 06/10/10 Page 3 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

LA 51278681

Dated: June 8, 2010 STROOCK & STROOCK & LAVAN LLP 

By: /s/ 

Marcos D. Sasso 

Attorneys for Defendant/Cross-Complainant 

CITIBANK (SOUTH DAKOTA), N.A.

ORDER

 

Good cause appearing in the parties' Stipulation, 

IT IS ORDERED as follows: 

(1) The trial date and all other pretrial dates shall be continued approximately 45 days 

from the currently scheduled dates such that the new schedule shall be as follows: 

 1) File Joint Mid-Lit Statement, July 26, 2010 

 2) Discovery Cutoff, August 16, 2010 

 3) File Dispositive Motions, September 22, 2010; 

 4) Dispositive Motion Hearing, October 20, 2010 at 9:30 a.m.; 

 5) Final Pre-Trial Conference, December 17, 2010 at 3 p.m.; and 

 6) Trial, February 7, 2011 at 9:00 a.m. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATE: June 10, 2010 /s/ John A. Mendez________________

 JOHN A. MENDEZ 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 2:09-cv-02107-JAM-EFB Document 12 Filed 06/10/10 Page 4 of 4