Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-00552/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-00552-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Jack Stuart Greenberg
Petitioner
Jeff Wrigley
Respondent

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JACK STUART GREENBERG, )

)

)

Petitioner, )

)

v. )

)

)

JEFF WRIGLEY, )

)

)

Respondent. )

)

 )

1:07-cv-00552-OWW-TAG HC 

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATION (Doc. 5)

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS

PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

(Doc. 4)

ORDER DISMISSING PETITION FOR WRIT

OF HABEAS CORPUS (Doc. 1)

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT

TO ENTER JUDGMENT

On April 10, 2007, Petitioner filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 2241 in this Court.

On June 6, 2007, Respondent filed a motion to dismiss the petition as moot. (Doc. 4). 

On July 26, 2007, the Magistrate Judge assigned to the case filed a Findings and

Recommendation recommending the motion to dismiss be granted and that the petition for writ

of habeas corpus be dismissed because the petition was moot. (Doc. 5). This Findings and

Recommendation was served on all parties and contained notice that any objections were to be

filed within twenty days from the date of service of that order. To date, the parties have not filed

timely objections to the Findings and Recommendation.

Case 1:07-cv-00552-OWW -TAG Document 6 Filed 08/30/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted

a de novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court concludes that

the Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendation is supported by the record and proper

analysis. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendation, filed July 26, 2007 (Doc. 5), is ADOPTED

IN FULL;

2. Respondent’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 4), is GRANTED;

3. This petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. 1), is DISMISSED; and

4. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to ENTER JUDGMENT and close the file. 

This order terminates the action in its entirety. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 30, 2007 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger 

emm0d6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:07-cv-00552-OWW -TAG Document 6 Filed 08/30/07 Page 2 of 2