Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-00886/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-00886-2/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Jonas David Smith
Petitioner
Jeff Wrigley
Respondent

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JONAS DAVID SMITH, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

vs. )

)

)

JEFF WRIGLEY, Warden, )

)

Respondent. )

)

)

___________________________________ )

1:06-cv-0886 AWI WMW HC

ORDER REQUIRING

PETITIONER TO REFILE

RESPONSE TO MOTION TO

DISMISS

Petitioner is a former federal prisoner proceeding pro se on a petition for writ of

habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 2241. The matter was referred to a United States

Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72-302.

On February 15, 2007, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations in

regard to Respondent’s motion to dismiss filed January 29, 2007. These findings and

recommendations were served on the parties and contained notice to the parties that any

objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within thirty days. 

On February 20, 200, Petitioner filed a Motion for Summary Judgment in this case. 

Case 1:06-cv-00886-AWI-WMW Document 17 Filed 03/09/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 2

Concealed within that motion as Exhibit B is a document entitled “Petitioner’s Response Re:

Motion to Dismiss.” Petitioner is hereby informed that any such response to a motion by the

opposing party must be filed separately. 

Accordingly, Petitioner is HEREBY ORDERED to refile as a separate document his

response to the motion to dismiss. Petitioner shall do this within ten (10) days of the date of

service of this order. Thereafter, the court will construe Petitioner’s response as objections to

the findings and recommendations. Respondent shall have ten (10) days after the filing of

Petitioner’s response to file a reply.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

bl0dc4Dated: March 9, 2007 /s/ William M. Wunderlich 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-00886-AWI-WMW Document 17 Filed 03/09/07 Page 2 of 2