Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-09-02188/USCOURTS-ca4-09-02188-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Cecelia Contreras
Appellee
L. Ruther
Appellant
Mark Simmons
Appellee

Document Text:

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-2188

L. RUTHER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

CECELIA CONTRERAS; MARK SIMMONS,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior

District Judge. (3:09-cv-00495-RLW)

Submitted: June 1, 2010 Decided: June 4, 2010

Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

L. Ruther, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 09-2188 Doc: 11 Filed: 06/04/2010 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

L. Ruther appeals the district court’s order 

dismissing his civil complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) 

(2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible 

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the 

district court. Ruther v. Contreras, No. 3:09-cv-00495-RLW 

(E.D. Va. Sept. 25, 2009). We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented 

in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Appeal: 09-2188 Doc: 11 Filed: 06/04/2010 Pg: 2 of 2