Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-16-06629/USCOURTS-ca4-16-06629-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Isaac Norel Sturdivant
Appellant
United States of America
Appellee

Document Text:

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-6629

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

ISAAC NOREL STURDIVANT,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle 

District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. William L. Osteen, 

Jr., Chief District Judge. (1:10-cr-00123-WO-1)

Submitted: August 18, 2016 Decided: August 23, 2016

Before WILKINSON, KING, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Isaac Norel Sturdivant, Appellant Pro Se. Michael A. DeFranco, 

Sandra Jane Hairston, Robert Michael Hamilton, Angela Hewlett 

Miller, Assistant United States Attorneys, Greensboro, North 

Carolina, Paul Alexander Weinman, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES 

ATTORNEY, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 16-6629 Doc: 7 Filed: 08/23/2016 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Isaac Norel Sturdivant appeals the district court’s order 

granting his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for a sentence 

reduction based on Amendment 782 of the U.S. Sentencing 

Guidelines Manual.* We have reviewed the record and find no 

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated 

by the district court. See United States v. Sturdivant, No. 

1:10–cr–00123-WO-1 (M.D.N.C. Apr. 12, 2016). We dispense with 

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

 * The district court granted Sturdivant’s § 3582(c)(2) 

motion, but did not reduce his sentence to the full extent he 

requested.

Appeal: 16-6629 Doc: 7 Filed: 08/23/2016 Pg: 2 of 2