Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-09-06966/USCOURTS-ca4-09-06966-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Vincent Rutherford
Appellant
United States of America
Appellee

Document Text:

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 09-6966

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff - Appellee, 

 v. 

VINCENT RUTHERFORD, 

 Defendant - Appellant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Graham C. Mullen, 

Senior District Judge. (1:02-cr-00049-GCM-1) 

Submitted: December 17, 2009 Decided: January 21, 2010 

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. 

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Vincent Rutherford, Appellant Pro Se. C. Nicks Williams, OFFICE 

OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, North Carolina, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 

Appeal: 09-6966 Doc: 12 Filed: 01/21/2010 Pg: 1 of 2
2 

PER CURIAM: 

Vincent Rutherford appeals the district court’s order 

denying his motion for reduction of sentence, 18 U.S.C. 

§ 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no 

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated 

by the district court. United States v. Rutherford, No. 1:02-

cr-00049-GCM-1 (W.D.N.C. May 21, 2009). We deny Rutherford’s 

motion to strike sentencing enhancement and request for 

evidentiary hearing and incorporated memorandum of law, and we 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

AFFIRMED

Appeal: 09-6966 Doc: 12 Filed: 01/21/2010 Pg: 2 of 2