Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-02182/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-02182-2/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
Defendant
Connor Albert Davis
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CONNOR ALBERT DAVIS,

Plaintiff,

v.

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF 

CORRECTIONS AND 

REHABILITATION,

Defendants.

No. 2:14-cv-2182 WBS DAD P

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

By an order filed March 23, 2015, plaintiff was ordered to file an in forma pauperis 

affidavit or pay the appropriate filing fee within thirty days and was cautioned that failure to do so 

would result in a recommendation for dismissal of this action without prejudice. The thirty-day 

period has now expired, and plaintiff has not responded to the court’s order and has not filed an in 

forma pauperis affidavit or paid the appropriate filing fee. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without 

prejudice.

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 

after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections 

with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings 

Case 2:14-cv-02182-WBS-DAD Document 19 Filed 05/18/15 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the 

specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 

F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

Dated: May 15, 2015

DAD:9

davi2182.fifp

Case 2:14-cv-02182-WBS-DAD Document 19 Filed 05/18/15 Page 2 of 2