Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-19-07330/USCOURTS-ca4-19-07330-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Richard Arlee Champion
Appellant
United States of America
Appellee

Document Text:

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-7330

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

RICHARD ARLEE CHAMPION,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at 

Asheville. Martin K. Reidinger, District Judge. (1:17-cr-00046-MR-WCM-5)

Submitted: January 31, 2020 Decided: February 19, 2020

Before KING, FLOYD, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Vacated and remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Richard Arlee Champion, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 19-7330 Doc: 5 Filed: 02/19/2020 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Richard Arlee Champion appeals the district court’s orders denying his motion to 

compel trial counsel to produce Champion’s case file so that Champion may pursue 28 

U.S.C. § 2255 (2018) relief, and a subsequent order denying reconsideration. We review 

the denial of a motion to compel under an abuse-of-discretion standard. See Horne v. 

WTVR, LLC, 893 F.3d 201, 212 (4th Cir. 2018), cert. denied, 139 S. Ct. 823 (2019). Under 

North Carolina Rules of Professional Conduct 1.16(d), “[u]pon termination of 

representation, a lawyer shall take steps to the extent reasonably practicable to protect a 

client’s interests, such as . . . surrendering papers and property to which the client is 

entitled.” See also United States v. Basham, 789 F.3d 358, 388 (4th Cir. 2015) (reviewing 

legal authority requiring counsel to deliver client’s file upon termination of representation). 

Thus, because Champion’s former trial counsel should return the case file to Champion, 

we conclude the court misapprehended the applicable legal principles and abused its 

discretion in denying Champion’s motion to compel.

Accordingly, we vacate the district court’s orders and remand with instructions to 

grant Champion’s motion to compel Champion’s former trial counsel to send Champion 

the case file to which he is entitled. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument 

would not aid the decisional process.

VACATED AND REMANDED

USCA4 Appeal: 19-7330 Doc: 5 Filed: 02/19/2020 Pg: 2 of 2