Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-16-06336/USCOURTS-ca4-16-06336-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
South Carolina Judicial Department
Appellee
Glynndeavin von Fox
Appellant

Document Text:

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-6336

GLYNNDEAVIN VON FOX,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

SOUTH CAROLINA JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Charleston. Richard M. Gergel, District Judge. 

(2:16-cv-00209-RMG)

Submitted: August 16, 2016 Decided: August 24, 2016

Before TRAXLER, KING, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Glynndeavin von Fox, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 16-6336 Doc: 16 Filed: 08/24/2016 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Glynndeavin von Fox appeals the district court’s order 

denying his motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and 

dismissing his case. We have reviewed the record and find no 

reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma 

pauperis on appeal and dismiss von Fox’s appeal for the reasons 

stated by the district court. von Fox v. S.C. Judicial Dep’t, No. 

2:16-cv-00209-RMG (D.S.C. Feb. 12, 2016). We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before this court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Appeal: 16-6336 Doc: 16 Filed: 08/24/2016 Pg: 2 of 2