Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_13-cv-00559/USCOURTS-caed-2_13-cv-00559-3/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Duncan Brown
Defendant
County of Sacramento
Defendant
Scott Jones
Defendant
Joseph Millican
Defendant
Robert I. Reese, Jr.
Plaintiff
Zachary Rose
Defendant

Document Text:

1 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO MODIFY PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER 

{01337616.DOC}

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

LAW OFFICE OF STEWART KATZ 

Stewart Katz, SBN # 127425 

555 University Avenue, Suite 270 

Sacramento, CA 95825 

Tel: (916) 444-5678 

Attorney for Plaintiff 

ROBERT I. REESE, JR. 

A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION 

John R. Whitefleet, SBN 213301 

Taylor W. Rhoan, SBN 294941 

350 University Avenue, Suite 200 

Sacramento, California 95825 

TEL: 916.929.1481 

FAX: 916.927.3706 

Attorneys for Defendants COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, SCOTT JONES, JOSEPH MILLICAN, 

ZACHARY ROSE, and DUNCAN BROWN 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

ROBERT I. REESE, JR., 

 Plaintiff, 

vs. 

COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO; Sacramento

County Sheriff’s Department Deputy

DUNCAN BROWN (Badge #1220);

Sacramento County Sheriff’s Department

Deputy ZACHARY ROSE (Badge #832);

Sacramento County Sheriff’s Department

Sergeant JOSEPH MILLICAN (Badge #246);

and Sacramento County Sheriff SCOTT

JONES. 

 

 Defendants. 

Case No.: 2:13-cv-00559-JAM-DAD 

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO MODIFY

SCHEDULING ORDER 

Scheduling Order entered on: 05/10/2013 

 / 

Case 2:13-cv-00559-WBS-DB Document 31 Filed 01/05/15 Page 1 of 3
2 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO MODIFY PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER 

{01337616.DOC}

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between Plaintiff ROBERT REESE 

and Defendants COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, SCOTT JONES, JOSEPH MILLICAN, ZACHARY 

ROSE, and DUNCAN BROWN, by and through their undersigned Counsel, pursuant to Local Rule 

143 as follows: 

1. The parties respectfully request that the District Court modify the Pretrial Scheduling 

Order to continue discovery deadlines to allow for additional time to conduct discovery of expert 

witnesses, based on good cause appearing as more fully set forth below. 

2. The parties have previously modified discovery and expert disclosure deadlines on two 

prior occasions by Stipulation and Order on March 5, 2014 (Document 18) and June 17, 2014 

(Document 20.) The other deadlines including the dates originally set for trial, pretrial conference and 

dispositive hearing, as well as the associated deadlines, were previously modified by the Scheduling 

Order on June 17, 2014 (Document 20.) 

3. Due to the large number of witnesses and potential experts has complicated the 

deadlines for disclosure and thus intruded on the time to conduct expert depositions, expert discovery 

and prepare expert reports. In addition, unexpected expert and scheduling complications have rendered 

the current discovery dates unworkable. The parties submit good cause exists to further modify the 

scheduling order to amend discovery deadlines only by two weeks each. 

4. Therefore, the parties respectfully submit that good cause exists to amend the discovery 

deadlines of the Pretrial Scheduling Order dated June 17, 2014, as follows: 

Deadline Old Date New Date 

Expert witness disclosure deadline February 13, 2015 February 27, 2015 

Supplemental and Rebuttal witness 

disclosure deadline 

February 20, 2015 March 13, 2015 

Close of discovery April 17, 2015 April 30, 2015 

Dispositive motion filing June 3, 2015 Unmodified 

Dispositive motion hearing July 1, 2015 at 9:30 a.m Unmodified 

Joint Pretrial Statement due July 31, 2015 Unmodified 

Pretrial Conference August 7, 2015 

at 11:00 a.m. 

Unmodified 

Case 2:13-cv-00559-WBS-DB Document 31 Filed 01/05/15 Page 2 of 3
3 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO MODIFY PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER 

{01337616.DOC}

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Trial September 14, 2015 

at 9:00 a.m. 

Unmodified 

This Stipulation may be signed in counterparts and any facsimile or electronic signature shall be 

as valid as an original signature. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

Dated: January 2, 2015 LAW OFFICE OF STEWART KATZ 

 By __/s/ Stewart Katz _as authorized on 12/30/14 

 Stewart Katz 

 Attorney for Plaintiff ROBERT REESE 

Dated: January 2, 2015 PORTER SCOTT 

 A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION 

 By /s/ John R. Whitefleet 

 John R. Whitefleet 

 Taylor W. Rhoan 

Attorneys for Defendants COUNTY OF 

SACRAMENTO, DEPUTY DUNCAN BROWN, 

DEPUTY ZACHARY ROSE, DEPUTY JOSEPH 

MILLICAN, and SHERIFF SCOTT JONES 

ORDER

Having reviewed the above stipulation and good cause appearing therefore, IT IS HEREBY 

ORDERED that the Pretrial Scheduling Order, be modified with the new schedule as set forth above. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: 1/2/2015 /s/ John A. Mendez____________ 

United States District Court Judge 

Case 2:13-cv-00559-WBS-DB Document 31 Filed 01/05/15 Page 3 of 3