Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_09-cv-05596/USCOURTS-cand-3_09-cv-05596-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Douglas Clem
Counter-claimant
Donald Orosco
Counter-defendant

Document Text:

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 

STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

CASE NO. 09-CV-05596 JSW 

JOHN L. SLAFSKY, State Bar No. 195513 

HOLLIS BETH HIRE, State Bar No. 203651 

MARK S. WARNICK, State Bar No. 226791 

WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI 

Professional Corporation 

650 Page Mill Road 

Palo Alto, CA 94304-1050 

Telephone: (650) 493-9300 

Facsimile: (650) 493-6811 

jslafsky@wsgr.com 

hhire@wsgr.com 

mwarnick@wsgr.com 

Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterclaim-Defendant 

DONALD OROSCO 

ROBERT M. VANTRESS, State Bar No. 106442 

VANTRESS LAW GROUP 

4820 Harwood Road, Second Floor 

San Jose, CA 95124 

Telephone: (408) 905-6501 

Facsimile: (408) 583-4000 

rvantress@vantresslaw.com 

Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaim-Plaintiff 

DOUGLAS CLEM 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

DONALD OROSCO, a California individual, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

DOUGLAS CLEM, a Nevada individual, 

Defendant. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO.: 09-CV-05596 JSW 

STIPULATION AND ORDER OF 

DISMISSAL 

DOUGLAS CLEM, a Nevada individual, 

Counterclaim-Plaintiff, 

v. 

DONALD OROSCO, a California individual, 

 Counterclaim-Defendant. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case 3:09-cv-05596-JSW Document 19 Filed 03/10/10 Page 1 of 2 Case3:09-cv-05596-JSW Document18 Filed03/09/10 Page1 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

-2-

STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

CASE NO. 09-CV-05596 JSW 

 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and among the undersigned counsel 

for the parties, and pursuant to an executed Settlement and Coexistence Agreement and Fed. R. 

Civ. P. 41, that the above-captioned action and the claims, counterclaims and defenses asserted 

therein be dismissed with prejudice. Each party shall bear his own costs and fees. 

The parties further stipulate and agree to the continued jurisdiction of this Court for the 

purposes of any dispute arising out of, relating to, or in connection with the Settlement and 

Coexistence Agreement, or the breach, termination or validity thereof. 

Dated: March 9, 2010 WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI 

Professional Corporation 

By: /s/ John L. Slafsky 

 John L. Slafsky 

 Hollis Beth Hire 

 Mark S. Warnick 

Attorneys for Plaintiff and CounterclaimDefendant 

Donald Orosco 

Dated: March 5, 2010 VANTRESS LAW GROUP 

By: /s/ Robert M. Vantress 

 Robert M. Vantress 

Attorneys for Defendant and CounterclaimPlaintiff 

Douglas Clem 

SO ORDERED 

DATED: 

 

The Honorable Jeffrey S. White 

United States District Judge 

Case3:09-cv-05596-JSW Document18 Filed03/09/10 Page2 of 3

The Court declines to retain jurisdiction to enforce the settlement agreement.

March 10, 2010

Case 3:09-cv-05596-JSW Document 19 Filed 03/10/10 Page 2 of 2