Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-00353/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-00353-3/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Ronald E. Cearley
Plaintiff
Wells Fargo Bank
Defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RONALD E. CEARLEY,

Plaintiff,

v.

WELLS FARGO BANK,

Defendant.

No. 2:15-cv-353-MCE-EFB PS

ORDER

On January 8, 2016, the magistrate judge filed Findings and Recommendations herein

(ECF No. 33) which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to 

the Findings and Recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Neither party filed 

objections to the Findings and Recommendations.

The Court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and, good cause appearing, 

concludes that it is appropriate to adopt the proposed Findings and Recommendations in full.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations filed January 8, 2016 (ECF No. 33) are 

ADOPTED IN FULL; 

2. Plaintiff’s Motion to Reverse and Revoke the Sale of Property (ECF No. 13) is

DENIED;

3. Defendant’s Amended Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 7) is GRANTED; and 

Case 2:15-cv-00353-MCE-EFB Document 34 Filed 02/04/16 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

4. Plaintiff is granted thirty (30) days from the date this Order is electronically filed to file 

an amended complaint that cures the deficiencies the magistrate judge identified in the Findings 

and Recommendations. The amended complaint must bear the docket number assigned to this 

case and must be labeled “First Amended Complaint.” Failure to file an amended complaint will 

result in dismissal of this action. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: February 2, 2016

Case 2:15-cv-00353-MCE-EFB Document 34 Filed 02/04/16 Page 2 of 2