Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_03-cv-05045/USCOURTS-cand-3_03-cv-05045-5/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Rosemary Bosque
Defendant
Frank Y. Chiu
Defendant
City and County of San Francisco
Defendant
Michael Hamman
Plaintiff
Jim Hutchinson
Defendant
Wing Lau
Defendant
Leo McFadden
Defendant
The Abatement Appeals Board
Defendant
The Building Inspection Commission
Defendant
The Department of Building Inspection
Defendant
William Wong
Defendant

Document Text:

JT CASE MGMT STMT 1 N:\LIT\LI2004\041148\00365851.DOC

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DENNIS J. HERRERA, State Bar #139669

City Attorney 

JOANNE HOEPER, State Bar #114961

Chief Trial Deputy 

JAMES EMERY, State Bar #153630 

Deputy City Attorney 

Fox Plaza 

1390 Market Street, 6th Floor 

San Francisco, California 94102-5408 

Telephone: (415) 554-4261 

Facsimile: (415) 554-3837 

Email: james.emery@sfgov.org 

Attorneys for Defendants 

THE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, ET AL. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

MICHAEL HAMMAN, 

 Plaintiff, 

 vs. 

THE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN 

FRANCISCO; THE DEPARTMENT OF 

BUILDING INSPECTION, THE 

BUILDING INSPECTION 

COMMISSION, THE ABATEMENT 

APPEALS BOARD, FRANK Y. CHIU, 

DIRECTOR DEPARTMENT OF 

BUILDING INSPECTION, WILLIAM 

WONG, DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF 

PERMIT SERVICES, JIM 

HUTCHINSON, DEPUTY DIRECTOR 

OF INSPECTION SERVICES, WING 

LAU, CHIEF BUILDING INSPECTOR, 

LEO MCFADDEN, SUPERVISOR 

CODE ENFORCEMENT SECTION, 

AND ROSEMARY BOSQUE, 

DEPARTMENT OF BUILDING 

INSPECTION HEARING OFFICER 

AND DOES 1-100. 

 Defendants. 

Case No. C03-5045 JSW/EDL

JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT 

STATEMENT AND PROPOSED 

ORDER 

Date: March 31, 2006 

Time: 1:30 p.m. 

Place: Courtroom 2, 17th floor 

Date Filed: Nov. 13, 2003 

Trial Date: not set 

The parties have agreed on language for their settlement agreement. Plaintiff intends to 

execute the settlement agreement. The City has executed the settlement agreement, and it is 

CASE NO. C03-05045JSW 

Case 3:03-cv-05045-JSW Document 45 Filed 03/24/2006 Page 1 of 2
 Case 3:03-cv-05045-JSW Document 46 Filed 03/27/06 Page 1 of 2
JT CASE MGMT STMT 2 N:\LIT\LI2004\041148\00365851.DOC

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

circulating the agreement for all other necessary signatures. Pursuant to the terms of the 

settlement agreement, plaintiff will dismiss this action with prejudice once all parties have 

executed the settlement agreement. 

Respectfully Submitted, 

Dated: March 24, 2006 By: /s/ 

JAMES M. EMERY 

Attorneys for Defendants 

THE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN 

FRANCISCO; THE DEPARTMENT OF 

BUILDING INSPECTION, THE BUILDING 

INSPECTION COMMISSION, THE 

ABATEMENT APPEALS BOARD, FRANK Y. 

CHIU, WILLIAM WONG, JIM HUTCHINSON, 

WING LAU, LEO MCFADDEN, AND 

ROSEMARY BOSQUE 

Dated: March 24, 2006 By: /s/ 

ERIC MCFARLAND 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

MICHAEL HAMMAN 

SO ORDERED: 

Dated: __________ __________________________________ 

 HON. JEFFREY S. WHITE 

 United States District Judge 

CASE NO. C03-05045JSW 

Case 3:03-cv-05045-JSW Document 45 Filed 03/24/2006 Page 2 of 2

The case management conference set for March 31, 2006 at 1:30 p.m. is hereby RESET 

for April 21, 2006 at 1:30 p.m., and shall be vacated upon receipt of the stipulation of 

dismissal. March 27, 2006

Case 3:03-cv-05045-JSW Document 46 Filed 03/27/06 Page 2 of 2