Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-02859/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-02859-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Beach Hut Deli
Defendant
Beach Hut Midtown LLC
Defendant
Holly Cash
Plaintiff
Anna Zee
Defendant
John Zee
Defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

HOLLY CASH,

Plaintiff,

v.

BEACH HUT MIDTOWN LLC, a

California Limited Liability 

Co, dba BEACH HUT DELI; JOHN 

ZEE; and ANNA ZEE,

Defendants.

No. 2:14-cv-02859-GEB-CKD

ORDER CONTINUING STATUS 

(PRETRIAL SCHEDULING) 

CONFERENCE; FED. R. CIV. P. 4(M) 

NOTICE

This case is not ready to be scheduled. Therefore, the 

Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference scheduled for hearing on 

February 23, 2015, is continued to May 4, 2015, at 9:00 a.m. A 

joint status report shall be filed no later than fourteen (14) 

days prior to the Status Conference.

Further, Plaintiff is notified under Rule 4(m) of the 

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure that failure to serve Defendant 

John Zee with process within the 120 day period prescribed in 

that Rule may result in the unserved defendant being dismissed. 

To avoid dismissal, on or before April 10, 2015, Plaintiff shall 

file proof of service for this defendant or a sufficient 

Case 2:14-cv-02859-TLN-CKD Document 7 Filed 02/13/15 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

explanation why service was not completed within Rule 4(m)’s 

prescribed service period.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 12, 2015

Case 2:14-cv-02859-TLN-CKD Document 7 Filed 02/13/15 Page 2 of 2