Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_18-cv-05144/USCOURTS-cand-4_18-cv-05144-3/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
County of Napa
Defendant
Joseph Fallon
Defendant
Brandon Kemp
Defendant
Dante Michelucci
Plaintiff
Lenard Vare
Defendant

Document Text:

HIRSCHFELD 

KRAEMER LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN FRANCISCO

STIPULATION AND ORDER RE MOTION TO DISMISS 

CASE NO. 4:18-CV-05144-HSG 4820-6660- 5960

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

JOHN F. BAUM (SBN 148366)

jbaum@hkemploymentlaw.com 

IAN W. FORGIE (SBN 307721) 

iforgie@hkemploymentlaw.com 

HIRSCHFELD KRAEMER LLP 

505 Montgomery Street 13th Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94111 

Telephone: (415) 835-9000 

Facsimile: (415) 834-0443 

Attorneys for Defendant 

COUNTY OF NAPA 

DAVID POORE TURNER (SBN 192541)

dpoore@bplegalgroup.com 

BROWN | POORE LLP 

1350 Treat Boulevard, Suite 420 

Walnut Creek, CA 94597 

Telephone: (925) 943-1166 

Facsimile: (925) 955-8600 

JAMES MILLS (SBN 203783) 

james@jamesmillslaw.com 

LAW OFFICE OF JAMES MILLS 

1300 Clay Street, Suite 600 

Oakland, CA 94612 

Telephone: (510) 521-8748 

Facsimile: (510) 277-1413 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

DANTE MICHELUCCI 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

DANTE MICHELUCCI, 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

COUNTY OF NAPA; JOSEPH FALLON; 

BRANDON KEMP; LENARD VARE; and 

DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, 

Defendants. 

Case No. 4:18-cv-05144-HSG 

JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER 

REGARDING DEFENDANT’S MOTION 

TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF’S FIRST 

AMENDED COMPLAINT 

First Amended Complaint Filed:

 October 23, 2018 

 

Case 4:18-cv-05144-HSG Document 46 Filed 02/20/19 Page 1 of 3
HIRSCHFELD 

KRAEMER LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN FRANCISCO

2

STIPULATION AND ORDER RE MOTION TO DISMISS 

CASE NO. 4:18-CV-05144-HSG 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

WHEREAS Defendant County of Napa moved to dismiss the Second, Third, Fourth, and 

Fifth Causes of Action alleged in Plaintiff Dante Michelucci’s First Amended Complaint on the 

ground that the Charge (the “Original Charge”) Plaintiff filed with California’s Department of 

Fair Employment & Housing (the “DFEH”) was insufficiently specific to exhaust his 

administrative remedies before the DFEH; 

WHEREAS Plaintiff filed an amended Charge (the “Amended Charge”) with the DFEH 

on January 8, 2019, after briefing regarding Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s First 

Amended Complaint had closed; and 

WHEREAS the Parties agree that Plaintiff’s Amended Charge satisfies Plaintiff’s 

obligation to exhaust his administrative remedies before the DFEH with regard to the Second, 

Third, Fourth, and Fifth Causes of Action alleged in his First Amended Complaint. 

THEREFORE IT IS STIPULATED, by and between the Parties, that Defendant 

withdraws that portion of its Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint that sought 

dismissal of the Second, Third, Fourth, and Fifth Causes of Action on the ground that Plaintiff 

failed to exhaust his administrative remedies before the DFEH. 

Dated: February 19, 2019 HIRSCHFELD KRAEMER LLP

By: /s/ Ian W. Forgie 

John F. Baum 

Ian W. Forgie 

Attorneys for Defendant 

COUNTY OF NAPA 

Dated: February 19, 2019 BROWN | POORE LLP

By: /s/ David Poore Turner 

David Poore Turner 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

DANTE MICHELUCCI 

 

Case 4:18-cv-05144-HSG Document 46 Filed 02/20/19 Page 2 of 3
HIRSCHFELD 

KRAEMER LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN FRANCISCO

3

STIPULATION AND ORDER RE MOTION TO DISMISS 

CASE NO. 4:18-CV-05144-HSG 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

ORDER

GOOD CAUSE SHOWING, the Stipulation is APPROVED. 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that that portion of Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s 

First Amended Complaint which seeks dismissal of Plaintiff’s Second, Third, Fourth, and Fifth 

Causes of Action for failure to exhaust administrative remedies before the DFEH is DENIED AS 

MOOT. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: February 20, 2019 ___________________________________ 

 Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. 

Case 4:18-cv-05144-HSG Document 46 Filed 02/20/19 Page 3 of 3