Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-10-01187/USCOURTS-ca4-10-01187-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
C&M Forwarding Company, Incorporated

Anna M. Clayton
Appellant
James Dickens
Appellee
Jemko Transport, Incorporated
Appellee

Document Text:

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-1187

ANNA M. CLAYTON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

JAMES DICKENS; JEMKO TRANSPORT, INCORPORATED,

Defendants – Appellees,

and

C&M FORWARDING COMPANY, INCORPORATED,

Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Glen E. Conrad, District 

Judge. (7:08-cv-00592-gec-mfu)

Submitted: May 20, 2010 Decided: May 26, 2010

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Anna M. Clayton, Appellant Pro Se. David Wayne Hearn, SANDS 

ANDERSON, PC, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 10-1187 Doc: 13 Filed: 05/26/2010 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Anna M. Clayton appeals the district court’s order 

entering judgment for the Defendants on Clayton’s diversity 

action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible 

error. Accordingly, we deny Clayton’s motion for appointment of 

counsel and affirm the judgment of the district court. 

Clayton v. Dickens, No. 7:08-cv-00592-gec-mfu (E.D. Va. Jan. 27, 

2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

AFFIRMED

Appeal: 10-1187 Doc: 13 Filed: 05/26/2010 Pg: 2 of 2