Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_23-cv-02852/USCOURTS-caed-2_23-cv-02852-2/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Timothy Paul Lucero
Petitioner
The People
Respondent

Document Text:

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

TIMOTHY PAUL LUCERO, 

Petitioner, 

v. 

THE PEOPLE, 

Respondent. 

No. 2:23-cv-02852-EFB (HC) 

ORDER AND FINDINGS AND 

RECOMMENDATIONS 

 

 Petitioner, a county jail inmate proceeding pro se, has filed a petition for writ of habeas 

corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. 

By an order filed August 5, 2024, petitioner was ordered to file a complete in forma 

pauperis affidavit or to pay the appropriate filing fee, within thirty days, or his application would 

be dismissed. The thirty-day period has now expired, and petitioner has not responded to the 

court’s order, has not filed a proper in forma pauperis affidavit, and has not paid the appropriate 

filing fee. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall assign a district 

judge to this action; and IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without 

prejudice. These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 

Case 2:23-cv-02852-WBS-EFB Document 8 Filed 10/21/24 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2 

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 

after being served with these findings and recommendations, petitioner may file written 

objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s 

Findings and Recommendations.” Petitioner is advised that failure to file objections within the 

specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 

1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 

Dated: October 21, 2024 

Case 2:23-cv-02852-WBS-EFB Document 8 Filed 10/21/24 Page 2 of 2