Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-00662/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-00662-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
People of the State of California
Respondent
Rueben Roberts
Petitioner

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

United States District Court

Eastern District of California 

Rueben Roberts,

Petitioner, No. Civ. S 05-0662 GEB PAN P

vs. Findings and Recommendations

People of the State

of California,

Respondent.

-oOoApril 5, 2005, petitioner filed an application for a writ of

habeas corpus without the required filing fee or a request for

leave to proceed in forma pauperis. April 27, 2005, the court

gave petitioner 30 days either to submit the required filing fee

or to submit a proper application to proceed in forma pauperis.

The 30 days have passed and petitioner has not submitted

either the filing fee or an application for leave to proceed in

forma pauperis.

I therefore recommend this action be dismissed without 

Case 2:05-cv-00662-GEB-PAN Document 6 Filed 07/13/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

prejudice.

Pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l), these

findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States

District Judge assigned to this case. Written objections may be

filed within 20 days of service of these findings and

recommendations. The document should be captioned “Objections to

Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” The district

judge may accept, reject, or modify these findings and

recommendations in whole or in part.

Dated: July 12, 2005. 

 /s/ Peter A. Nowinski 

 PETER A. NOWINSKI

 Magistrate Judge

Case 2:05-cv-00662-GEB-PAN Document 6 Filed 07/13/05 Page 2 of 2