Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00098/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00098-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Gloria Henry
Respondent
Debbie Ann Lowe
Petitioner

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DEBBIE ANN LOWE, )

)

)

)

Petitioner, )

)

vs. )

)

)

GLORIA HENRY, Warden, )

)

)

Respondent. )

)

)

No. CV-F-05-098 REC/LJO HC

ORDER VACATING JUDGMENT

ENTERED ON MAY 19, 2005

(Docs. 8 & 9) AND DIRECTING

PETITIONER TO SUBMIT

APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN

FORMA PAUPERIS OR PAY FILING

FEE 

On April 7, 2005, the United States Magistrate Judge filed a

recommendation that this action be dismissed because of

petitioner's failure to timely comply a court order. Petitioner

had not complied with the order filed on February 24, 2005

directing petitioner to submit, within 30 days of the date of

service of the order, a new application to proceed in forma

pauperis and a certified copy of the prison trust account or pay

the $5.00 filing fee. The docket in this action establishes that

petitioner was served with the February 24, 2005 order and that

she had and still has not complied with it. The docket also

Case 1:05-cv-00098-REC-LJO Document 10 Filed 06/06/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

establishes that petitioner was served with the recommendation. 

No objections to the recommendation were filed by petitioner. By

Order filed on May 19, 2005, the court adopted the recommendation

and dismissed the action for failure to comply with a court

order. Judgment for respondent was entered on May 19, 2005. 

On May 31, 2005, petitioner filed an "Objection to Judgment

of Dismissal; Motion to Respond to Findings and Recommendation." 

Petitioner contends that she did not receive the recommendation

filed and served on April 7, 2005 and implies that she did not

receive the February 24, 2005 order, asserting that "the fault

lies with the prison for not delivering my legal mail." 

Because it is possible that the copies of the February 24,

2005 order and the April 7, 2005 recommendation were not

delivered to petitioner by prison authorities, the court vacates

the judgment entered on May 19, 2005. Within 30 days of the

filing date of this order, petitioner is ordered to submit a

completed application to proceed in forma pauperis, or in the

alternative, pay the $5.00 filing fee for this action. Failure

to timely comply with this order will result in the dismissal of

this action. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 3, 2005 /s/ Robert E. Coyle 

668554 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:05-cv-00098-REC-LJO Document 10 Filed 06/06/05 Page 2 of 2