Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-15-06969/USCOURTS-ca4-15-06969-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Kelly George Stanback
Appellant
United States of America
Appellee

Document Text:

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-6969

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

KELLY GEORGE STANBACK,

 Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of Virginia, at Harrisonburg. Michael F. Urbanski, 

District Judge. (5:02-cr-30020-SGW-1)

Submitted: September 9, 2015 Decided: September 14, 2015

Before SHEDD, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kelly George Stanback, Appellant Pro Se. Grayson A. Hoffman, Jeb 

Thomas Terrien, Assistant United States Attorneys, Elizabeth G. 

Wright, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Harrisonburg, 

Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 15-6969 Doc: 8 Filed: 09/14/2015 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Kelly George Stanback appeals the district court’s order 

granting his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion.* We have 

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, 

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United 

States v. Stanback, No. 5:02-cr-30020-SGW-1 (W.D. Va. filed June 

8 and entered June 9, 2015). We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented 

in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

 * Although the district court granted Stanback’s § 3582 

motion, the reduction granted by the court did not reduce 

Stanback’s sentence to the full extent he requested.

Appeal: 15-6969 Doc: 8 Filed: 09/14/2015 Pg: 2 of 2