Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-00222/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-00222-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Darral G. Adams
Respondent
Julio G. Covington
Petitioner

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JULIO G. COVINGTON,

Petitioner, No. CIV S-06-0222 FCD DAD P

vs.

DARRAL G. ADAMS,

Respondent. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

By order filed February 21, 2006, petitioner’s application was dismissed and thirty

days’ leave to file an amended application was granted. The thirty day period has now expired,

and petitioner has not filed an amended application or otherwise responded to the court’s order.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed

without prejudice. See Local Rule 11-110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty

days after being served with these findings and recommendations, petitioner may file written

objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s

Findings and Recommendations.” Petitioner is advised that failure to file objections within the

/////

Case 2:06-cv-00222-FCD-DAD Document 5 Filed 04/07/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951

F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: April 7, 2006.

DAD:lg

covi0222.fta

Case 2:06-cv-00222-FCD-DAD Document 5 Filed 04/07/06 Page 2 of 2