Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-03821/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-03821-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
R. Monroy
Defendant
Phillip Villanueva
Plaintiff

Document Text:

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

PHILLIP VILLANUEVA,

Plaintiff,

 v.

CORRECTIONAL OFFICER R.

MONROY, 

Defendant.

_______________________________

_ 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

) 

) 

No. C 05-3821 MMC (PR) 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

Plaintiff, a California prisoner proceeding pro se, filed the above-titled civil rights

action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On October 28, 2005, the Court dismissed the complaint for

failure to state a cognizable claim for relief. Plaintiff was granted leave to file, within 30 days,

an amended complaint curing the deficiencies noted. The Court cautioned plaintiff that his

failure to file an amended complaint within the time provided would “result in the dismissal of

this action.” Plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint. Accordingly, the above-titled action

is hereby DISMISSED without prejudice. See WMX Technologies v. Miller, 104 F.3d 1133,

1136 (9th Cir. 1997) (holding further action by district court necessary where plaintiff fails to

amend after dismissal with leave to amend).

The Clerk shall close the file and terminate any pending motions.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: December 21, 2005

_________________________

MAXINE M. CHESNEY

United States District Judge

Case 3:05-cv-03821-MMC Document 7 Filed 12/21/05 Page 1 of 1