Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-00583/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-00583-3/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Will Holly
Plaintiff
John E. Potter
Defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

McGREGOR W. SCOTT

United States Attorney

KELLI L. TAYLOR

Assistant U.S. Attorney

501 I Street, Suite 10-100

Sacramento, California 95814

Telephone: (916) 554-2741

Attorneys for DEFENDANT JOHN E. POTTER, 

Postmaster General of the United States

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

WILL HOLLY,

Plaintiff,

v.

JOHN E. POTTER, Postmaster General of the

United States,

Defendants.

No. 2:07-cv-00583-MCE-EFB

STIPULATION RE CASE

SCHEDULE;ORDER THEREON

Plaintiff WILL HOLLY ("Plaintiff") and Defendant JOHN E. POTTER, Postmaster

General of the United States, collectively referred to as "the parties", by and through their

undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate to revise the scheduling order as follows: Defendant’s

expert reports are due fifteen days after the ruling on the Motion for Summary Judgment, if

judgment is not entered as requested, and not the August 20, 2008 date specified in the court’s

June 15, 2007 Scheduling Order. Except as specified herein, no other changes are made to the

Scheduling Order and all other dates and deadlines stated therein remain unchanged.

Good cause exists for this stipulation. The Postmaster filed a Motion for Summary

Judgment on July 3, 2008 and served it in compliance with governing rules. The Postmaster

scheduled the Motion for hearing on August 8, 2008 in an effort to obtain a ruling and possibly

Case 2:07-cv-00583-MCE -EFB Document 41 Filed 08/05/08 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

avoid the costs associated with obtaining finalized expert reports for the August 20, 2008

disclosure deadline. Plaintiff has now filed an Ex Parte request to postpone the hearing on the

Summary Judgment Motion until after the August 20 expert disclosure deadline. The th

Postmaster will be prejudiced by the requested extension if his time to disclose experts remains

unchanged. 

No prior modifications to the Scheduling Order have been requested and no further

changes are anticipated at this time.

IT IS SO STIPULATED:

DATED: July 31, 2008 By: /s/ Roy R. Levin 

ROY R. LEVIN

LAW OFFICES OF ROY R. LEVIN

Attorney for PLAINTIFF WILL HOLLY

DATED: July 31, 2008 McGREGOR W. SCOTT

United States Attorney

 By: /s/ Kelli L. Taylor 

KELLI L. TAYLOR

Assistant United States Attorney

Attorneys for the United States

Case 2:07-cv-00583-MCE -EFB Document 41 Filed 08/05/08 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3

ORDER

The Court has reviewed the reasons stated by counsel and finds that good legal cause

exits for the alteration of the scheduling conference order as requested. The request and

stipulation is therefore GRANTED and Defendant’s expert disclosure is due fifteen after the

issuance of the Order on the Motion for Summary Judgment if judgment is not entered as

requested. The Defendant’s August 8, 2008 Motion for Summary Judgment is vacated and

continued to October 3, 2008 at 9:00 a.m. in Courtroom 7. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 4, 2008

________________________________

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:07-cv-00583-MCE -EFB Document 41 Filed 08/05/08 Page 3 of 3