Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_12-cv-03030/USCOURTS-caed-2_12-cv-03030-5/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Mayuka S. Anderson
Defendant
William Van Anderson
Defendant
Emir Sehic
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

EMIR SEHIC,

Plaintiff,

v.

WILLIAM VAN ANDERSON; 

MAYUKA S. ANDERSON,

Defendants.

No. 2:12-cv-3030 DAD

ORDER

Each of the parties in the above-captioned case has consented to proceed before 

the assigned magistrate judge. By order filed March 12, 2013, the action was reassigned to the 

undersigned.

On September 17, 2013, defendants’ opposition to plaintiff’s motion to withdraw 

from the parties’ settlement agreement was filed. (Doc. No. 38.) It does not appear from reading 

defendants’ filing that plaintiff was served with a copy of defendants’ opposition.1

/////

/////

/////

 

1

 Defendants are advised that they must attach a proof of service to their court filings reflecting 

service upon plaintiff.

Case 2:12-cv-03030-DAD Document 40 Filed 09/26/13 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Defendants shall serve plaintiff with a copy of the opposition filed on 

September 17, 2013 within seven days of the date of this order; and

2. Plaintiff shall file his reply, if any, on or before October 8, 2013.

Dated: September 25, 2013

DAD:6

Ddad1\orders.consent\sehic3030.serve.opp.docx

Case 2:12-cv-03030-DAD Document 40 Filed 09/26/13 Page 2 of 2