Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-01136/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-01136-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
City of Red Bluff
Defendant
Richard Hammond
Plaintiff

Document Text:

-1-

JOINT REQUEST TO ENLARGE TIME IN THE COURT’S SCHEDULING ORDER; ORDER

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

CORI R. SARNO, ESQ., SB No. 230559

 Email: csarno@akk-law.com

KEVIN J. DEHOFF, ESQ., SB No. 252106

 Email: kdehoff@akk-law.com

ANGELO, KILDAY & KILDUFF, LLP

Attorneys at Law

601 University Avenue, Suite 150

Sacramento, CA 95825

Telephone: (916) 564-6100

Telecopier: (916) 564-6263

Attorneys for Defendant CITY OF RED BLUFF

RAYMOND G. BALLISTER, JR., ESQ.

PHYL GRACE, ESQ.

ISABEL MASANQUE, ESQ.

 Email: isabelm@potterhandy.com

CENTER FOR DISABILITY ACCESS

P.O. Box 262490

San Diego, CA 92196-2490

Telephone: (858) 375-7385

Telecopier: (888) 422-5191

Attorneys for Plaintiff RICHARD HAMMOND

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RICHARD HAMMOND,

Plaintiff,

vs.

CITY OF RED BLUFF and Does 1-10, 

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: 2:14-cv-01136-TLN-CMK

JOINT REQUEST TO ENLARGE TIME 

IN THE COURT’S SCHEDULING 

ORDER; ORDER

WHEREAS the parties have stipulated to elect to refer this action to the Court’s 

Voluntary Dispute Resolution Program (VDRP);

WHEREAS the deposition of the person most knowledgeable (pmk) at the City of Red 

Bluff regarding on-street public parking is scheduled for August 4, 2015;

Case 2:14-cv-01136-TLN-CMK Document 16 Filed 07/27/15 Page 1 of 3
-2-

JOINT REQUEST TO ENLARGE TIME IN THE COURT’S SCHEDULING ORDER; ORDER

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WHEREAS pursuant to the Court’s scheduling order (Dkt# 11), discovery is set to close 

on August 7, 2015;

WHEREAS on October 8, 2015, the parties are required to disclose expert witnesses;

WHEREAS all dispositive motions shall be heard no later than February 11, 2016;

WHEREAS the parties wish to avoid the time and expense of the pmk deposition in light 

of the stipulation to VDRP and possible settlement;

WHEREAS the parties also do not want to incur the time and expense of expert 

discovery and dispositive motions should the case resolve at VDRP;

WHEREAS the parties believe that these circumstances establish “good cause” for a 

minimal modification of the existing scheduling order;

WHEREAS no further modification of the scheduling order is being sought. 

THE PARTIES THEREFORE, BY AND THROUGH THEIR RESPECTIVE 

ATTORNEYS OF RECORD, MAKE THE FOLLOWING STIPULATED REQUEST:

1. Enlarge the time for non-expert discovery to be conducted to allow the person 

most knowledgeable (pmk) at the City of Red Bluff regarding on-street public parking to occur 

after VDRP if the case does not resolve;

2. The expert discovery and dispositive motion deadlines outlined in the scheduling 

order (Dkt # 11) shall be continued to a date after VDRP if the case does not resolve;

3. All other dates in the scheduling order to remain unchanged unless the VDRP 

referral continues into 2016. 

Dated: July 24, 2015 CENTER FOR DISABILITY ACCESS

 /s/ Isabel Masanque [as authorized on 7/23/15

By:____________________________

 ISABEL MASANQUE

Attorney for Plaintiff, 

RICHARD HAMMOND

///

///

Case 2:14-cv-01136-TLN-CMK Document 16 Filed 07/27/15 Page 2 of 3
-3-

JOINT REQUEST TO ENLARGE TIME IN THE COURT’S SCHEDULING ORDER; ORDER

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Dated: July 27, 2015 ANGELO, KILDAY & KILDUFF, LLP

 

 /s/ Kevin J. Dehoff

By:____________________________

 KEVIN DEHOFF

 Attorney for Defendant, 

 CITY OF RED BLUFF

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 27, 2015

Case 2:14-cv-01136-TLN-CMK Document 16 Filed 07/27/15 Page 3 of 3