Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-14-01664/USCOURTS-ca4-14-01664-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Maximiliano Penaloza-Rebollar
Petitioner

Document Text:

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-1664

In re: MAXIMILIANO PENALOZA-REBOLLAR, a/k/a Tomas Pelaez 

Isidoro, a/k/a Daniel Aguerre-Rodriguez, a/k/a Ramiro 

Pesina,

Petitioner.

Petition for Writ of Mandamus.

(1:09-cr-00415-NCT-1; 1:12-cv-00948-NCT-JLW)

Submitted: February 25, 2015 Decided: March 10, 2015

Before NIEMEYER and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Maximiliano Penaloza-Rebollar, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 14-1664 Doc: 12 Filed: 03/10/2015 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Maximiliano Penaloza-Rebollar petitions for a writ of 

mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting 

on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. He seeks an order from 

this court directing the district court to act. Our review of 

the district court’s docket reveals that the district court has 

entered an order denying relief on Penaloza-Rebollar’s § 2255 

motion. Accordingly, because the district court has recently 

acted in this case, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We 

grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before this court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

Appeal: 14-1664 Doc: 12 Filed: 03/10/2015 Pg: 2 of 2