Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-01780/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-01780-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Abbey Carey
Defendant
Minnie Noble
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MINNIE NOBLE,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-06-1780 KJM PS

vs.

ABBEY CAREY,

Defendant. ORDER

 /

 Defendant’s motion to dismiss came on regularly for hearing January 24, 2007. 

Plaintiff Minnie Noble appeared in propria persona. John Gisla appeared for defendant. Upon

review of the documents in support and opposition, upon hearing the arguments of the parties,

and good cause appearing therefor, THE COURT FINDS AS FOLLOWS:

Defendant moves to dismiss on the ground that plaintiff has not exhausted her

administrative remedies. Plaintiff filed a formal EEO complaint on September 5, 2006 that

contains allegations similar to the claims raised in the instant federal action. The federal agency

has 180 days to investigate the complaint. Until that period of time passes, plaintiff cannot file a

judicial complaint in the district court. 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-16(c). 

/////

/////

Case 2:06-cv-01780-KJM Document 19 Filed 01/26/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Defendant’s motion to dismiss is granted.

2. This action is dismissed without prejudice.

DATED: January 25, 2007.

006

noble.oah 

Case 2:06-cv-01780-KJM Document 19 Filed 01/26/07 Page 2 of 2