Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-00882/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-00882-3/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Bharatkumar J. Patel
Petitioner
Jeff Wrigley
Respondent

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BHARATKUMAR J. PATEL, )

)

)

Petitioner, )

)

v. )

)

)

JEFF WRIGLEY, et al., )

)

)

Respondents. )

)

 )

1:06-cv- 00882-AWI-TAG HC

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATION (Doc. 11)

ORDER GRANTING RESPONDENT’S

MOTION TO DISMISS (Doc. 9)

ORDER DISMISSING PETITION FOR WRIT

OF HABEAS CORPUS (Doc. 1)

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT

TO ENTER JUDGMENT

On July 11, 2006, Petitioner filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 2241. (Doc. 1).

On October 31, 2006, Respondent filed a motion to dismiss the petition. (Doc. 9). On

April 18, 2007, the Magistrate Judge assigned to the case filed a Findings and Recommendation

recommending the motion to dismiss be granted and that the petition for writ of habeas corpus be

dismissed as moot. (Doc. 11). This Findings and Recommendation was served on all parties and

contained notice that any objections were to be filed within twenty days from the date of service

of that order. To date, the parties have not filed timely objections to the Findings and

Recommendation.

Case 1:06-cv-00882-AWI-TAG Document 14 Filed 07/26/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted

a de novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court concludes that

the Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendation is supported by the record and proper

analysis. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendation, filed April 18, 2007 (Doc. 11), is ADOPTED

IN FULL;

2. Respondent’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 9), is GRANTED;

3. This petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. 1), is DISMISSED as MOOT; and

4. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to ENTER JUDGMENT and close the file. 

This order terminates the action in its entirety. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 26, 2007 /s/ Anthony W. Ishii 

0m8i78 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-00882-AWI-TAG Document 14 Filed 07/26/07 Page 2 of 2