Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca10-88-02491/USCOURTS-ca10-88-02491-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Hilton Hotels Corporation
Appellee
Darlene Sikorski
Appellant
John P. Sikorski
Appellant

Document Text:

F' I LED 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT 

Uaittd States Court of .Appeals 

Tenth Cir,,,i~ 

FEB 12 1990 

ROBERT L. HOECKER 

Clerk JOHN P. SIKORSKI; DARLENE SIKORSKI, 

Plaintiffs-Appellants, 

v. 

HILTON HOTELS CORPORATION, 

Defendant-Appellee. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

\ 

J 

) 

) 

ORDER AND JUDGMENT* 

No. 88-2491 

(D.C. No. 86-JC-61) 

(D. Colo.) 

Before TACHA, BALDOCK, and BRORBY, Circuit Judges. 

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel 

has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially 

assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 

34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. 

submitted without oral argument. 

The case is therefore ordered 

Plaintiffs appeal from a district court judgment entered on a 

jury verdict for defendant in this premises liability action. 

The issues raised on appeal concern the district court's 

rejection of two instructions tendered by plaintiffs. We find no 

* This order and judgment has no precedential value and shall 

not be cited, or used by any court within the Tenth Circuit, 

except for purposes of establishing the doctrines of the law of 

the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. 10th Cir. R. 

36.3. 

Appellate Case: 88-2491 Document: 01019963030 Date Filed: 02/12/1990 Page: 1 
• 

merit to plaintiffs' objections regarding the instructions given 

to the jury, which, considered as a whole, fairly and accurately 

stated the existing law applicable to this case. See generally 

Schneider v. Pinnt, 476 P.2d 1004, 1006 (Colo. 1970)(stating 

standard for evaluating sufficiency of jury instructions); Aspen 

Plaza Co. v. Garcia, 691 P.2d 763, 765 (Colo. App. 1984)(same). 

The judgment of the United States District Court for the 

District of Colorado is AFFIRMED. 

ENTERED FOR THE COURT 

PER CURIAM 

2 

Appellate Case: 88-2491 Document: 01019963030 Date Filed: 02/12/1990 Page: 2