Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-09-08189/USCOURTS-ca4-09-08189-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
James Rodney Smith
Appellant
United States of America
Appellee

Document Text:

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-8189

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

JAMES RODNEY SMITH, a/k/a Lump,

Defendant – Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of North Carolina, at Fayetteville. Malcolm J. Howard, 

Senior District Judge. (3:94-cr-00065-H-6)

Submitted: June 1, 2010 Decided: June 7, 2010

Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James Rodney Smith, Appellant Pro Se. John Howarth Bennett, 

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greenville, North

Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 09-8189 Doc: 9 Filed: 06/07/2010 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

James Rodney Smith appeals from the district court’s 

order denying his motions for clarification of the judgment, 

clarification of his sentence, and to reduce his sentence. We 

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district 

court. United States v. Smith, No. 3:94-cr-00065-H-6 (E.D.N.C. 

Aug. 20, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the 

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before the court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Appeal: 09-8189 Doc: 9 Filed: 06/07/2010 Pg: 2 of 2