Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-01559/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-01559-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Boeing Company
Counter Claimant
City of Fresno
Counter Defendant
National Guard Bureau
Counter Claimant
United States Army Corps of Engineers
Counter Claimant
United States of America
Counter Claimant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

McGregor W. Scott

United States Attorney

Eastern District of California

Kimberly A. Gaab

Assistant United States Attorney

2500 Tulare Street, Suite 4401

Fresno, California 93721

(559) 497-4000 (telephone)

(559) 497-4099 (facsimile)

kimberly.gaab@usdoj.gov

Sue Ellen Wooldridge

Assistant Attorney General

Environmental & Natural Resources Division

Paul Cirino

Environmental Defense Section

United States Department of Justice

P.O. Box 23986

Washington, DC 20026-3986

(202) 514-1542 (telephone)

(202) 514-8865 (facsimile)

paul.cirino@usdoj.gov

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

__________________________________________ 

)

THE CITY OF FRESNO, )

) 

Plaintiff, )

) 

v. ) Case No. 1:06-cv-01559 OWW LJO

)

)

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED ) ORDER RE:

STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, ) UNITED STATES’ EX PARTE

NATIONAL GUARD BUREAU and THE ) REQUEST TO EXTEND THE TIME

BOEING COMPANY, ) TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

)

Defendants. )

__________________________________________)

The Court, having considered the papers in support of and in opposition to the ex parte

request of Defendants United States of America, United States Army Corps of Engineers, and

Case 1:06-cv-01559-OWW -GSA Document 14 Filed 01/10/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24 2

National Guard Bureau (collectively, “United States”) to extend the time to respond to the

complaint, and the argument of counsel at the telephone conference on January 5, 2007, hereby

orders as follows:

1. In light of Plaintiff’s representation that it will file an Amended Complaint on or

about January 16, 2007, the United States need not respond to the Complaint filed on November

2, 2006.

2. The United States shall answer, move, or otherwise respond with respect to the

Amended Complaint on or before February 28, 2007.

3. The parties shall electronically file a Joint Scheduling Report on or before March

7, 2007.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 9, 2007 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger 

emm0d6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-01559-OWW -GSA Document 14 Filed 01/10/07 Page 2 of 2