Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-08-06692/USCOURTS-ca4-08-06692-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
H. G. Alexander
Appellee
Rickie Joseph Anderson
Appellant
Dr. Connie Vice
Appellee
Dr. Herbert Myles
Appellee
Dr. Michael Weinstein
Appellee
Daniel Johnson
Appellee
Judge J. B. Allen
Appellee
Lt. Mack
Appellee
Pharmacist Julie Finch
Appellee
Sgt. K. Hallman
Appellee

Document Text:

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-6692

RICKIE JOSEPH ANDERSON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

PHARMACIST JULIE FINCH; LT. MACK; SGT. K. HALLMAN; DR. CONNIE

VICE; DR. HERBERT MYLES; DR. MICHAEL WEINSTEIN; DANIEL

JOHNSON; JUDGE J. B. ALLEN; H. G. ALEXANDER,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, Chief

District Judge. (5:08-ct-03002-FL)

Submitted: September 16, 2008 Decided: September 22, 2008

Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Rickie Joseph Anderson, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 08-6692 Doc: 9 Filed: 09/22/2008 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Rickie Joseph Anderson appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Anderson v.

Finch, No. 5:08-ct-03002-FL (E.D.N.C. Mar. 26, 2008). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Appeal: 08-6692 Doc: 9 Filed: 09/22/2008 Pg: 2 of 2