Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-02344/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-02344-2/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Zachary Lee Glenn
Plaintiff
High Desert State Prison
Defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ZACHARY LEE GLENN,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-05-2344 FCD DAD P

vs.

HIGH DESERT STATE PRISON,

Defendant. ORDER

 /

On January 19, 2006, the court received from plaintiff a civil rights complaint and

an in forma pauperis application. In the space intended for the court’s entry of a case number,

plaintiff entered “0503087.” The Clerk filed both documents in the above-captioned case.

In accordance with this court’s order filed November 30, 2005, and an extension

of time granted on December 21, 2005, plaintiff filed an amended complaint in this action on

December 30, 2005. Upon examination of the complaint received on January 19, 2006, the

undersigned finds that plaintiff did not submit the new complaint as yet another amended

complaint in this action. Nor is the in forma pauperis application received on January 19, 2006,

responsive to the order filed in this action on January 13, 2006. On the first page of the new

complaint, plaintiff states that he has brought one previous lawsuit about mental health staff at

High Desert State Prison. The above-captioned case is the lawsuit described. Plaintiff’s new

Case 2:05-cv-02344-FCD-DAD Document 12 Filed 01/23/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

complaint, on the other hand, concerns safety and housing issues, and does not involve mental

health staff. Exhibits to the new complaint reveal that the number “0503087” is the number

assigned to an internal investigation associated with plaintiff’s administrative appeal of claims

alleged in the new complaint.

The undersigned finds that the complaint and in forma pauperis application

received on January 19, 2006, were submitted for filing as a new case.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Clerk of the Court is directed to open a new case for the complaint and in

forma pauperis application filed in the above-captioned case on January 19, 2006; the case

number for the above-captioned case shall be removed from both documents before they are

scanned in the new case; and

2. The docket for the above-captioned case shall reflect that the documents

docketed in this case as #10 and #11 were filed in this case in error.

DATED: January 23, 2006.

DAD:13

glen2344.corr

Case 2:05-cv-02344-FCD-DAD Document 12 Filed 01/23/06 Page 2 of 2