Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-01168/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-01168-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Crew MW II, LP
Defendant
Lozano Construction
Plaintiff
Western Surety Company
Defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LOZANO CONSTRUCTION,

Plaintiff,

v.

WESTERN SURETY COMPANY, a 

South Dakota corporation; CREW MW II, 

LP, a Nevada limited partnership,

Defendants.

No. 2:15-cv-1168 DAD

ORDER SETTING STATUS

(PRETRIAL SCHEDULING)

CONFERENCE

On August 18, 2015, this case was reassigned to the undersigned pursuant to the consent 

of the parties. (Dkt. No. 15.)

Good cause appearing, IT IS ORDERED that:

1. A Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference is set for Friday, October 16, 2015, 

at 10:00 a.m. at the United States District Court, 501 I Street, Sacramento, California, in 

Courtroom No. 27 before the undersigned;

2. Any party may appear at the Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference 

telephonically if the party pre-arranges such appearance by contacting Pete Buzo, the courtroom 

deputy of the undersigned magistrate judge, at (916) 930-4128 at least 48 hours before the Status 

(Pretrial Scheduling) Conference. A land line telephone number must be provided;

/////

Case 2:15-cv-01168-DAD Document 16 Filed 09/14/15 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

3. Plaintiff shall file and serve a status report on or before October 2, 2015, and 

defendants shall file and serve a status report on or before October 9, 2015. Each party’s status 

report shall address all of the following matters:

a. Progress of service of process;

b. Possible joinder of additional parties;

c. Possible amendment of the pleadings;

d. Jurisdiction and venue;

e. Anticipated motions and the scheduling thereof;

f. Anticipated discovery and the scheduling thereof, including 

disclosure of expert witnesses;

g. Future proceedings, including the setting of appropriate cut-off 

dates for discovery and for law and motion, and the scheduling of a 

final pretrial conference and trial;

h. Modification of standard pretrial procedures specified by the rules 

due to the relative simplicity or complexity of the action;

i. Whether the case is related to any other case, including matters in 

bankruptcy;

j. Whether the parties will stipulate to the magistrate judge assigned 

to this matter acting as settlement judge, waiving any 

disqualification by virtue of his so acting, or whether they prefer to 

have a Settlement Conference before another magistrate judge; and

k. Any other matters that may aid in the just and expeditious 

disposition of this action.

4. The parties are cautioned that failure to file a timely status report, or failure to 

appear at the status conference either in person or telephonically, may result in an order imposing 

an appropriate sanction. See Local Rules 110 and 183.

Dated: September 14, 2015

DAD:6

Ddad1\orders.consent\lozano1168.ossc.docx

Case 2:15-cv-01168-DAD Document 16 Filed 09/14/15 Page 2 of 2