Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_21-cv-02182/USCOURTS-caed-2_21-cv-02182-3/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
City of Auburn
Defendant
Dalton Edward Dyer
Plaintiff
Joshua Eagan
Defendant
Matthew Nichols
Defendant
John Ruffcorn
Defendant

Document Text:

{02772605.DOCX} 1 

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR RESPONSIVE PLEADING TO SECOND AMENDED 

COMPLAINT 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

PORTER | SCOTT 

350 University Ave., Suite 200 

Sacramento, CA 95825 

TEL: 916.929.1481 

FAX: 916.927.3706 

A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION 

John R. Whitefleet, SBN 213301 

350 University Ave., Suite 200 

Sacramento, California 95825 

TEL: 916.929.1481 

FAX: 916.927.3706 

Attorneys for Defendants CITY OF AUBURN, JOHN RUFFCORN, JOSHUA EAGAN, 

MATTHEW NICHOLS 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

DALTON EDWARD DYER, 

 Plaintiff, 

 

v. 

CITY OF AUBURN, JOHN RUFFCORN, 

JOSHUA EAGAN, AND MATTHEW 

NICHOLS, 

 Defendants. 

___________________________________/

CASE NO. 2:21-cv-02182-JAM-JDP 

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO 

EXTEND TIME FOR RESPONSIVE 

PLEADING TO SECOND 

AMENDED COMPLAINT 

(LOCAL RULE 144; Fed. R. Civ. P. 6) 

TO THE COURT, ALL PARTIES, AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD: 

Pursuant to Eastern District Local Rule 144, and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 6, Plaintiff 

Dalton Edward Dyer, by and through his undersigned counsel of record, hereby stipulates that 

Defendants City of Auburn, John Ruffcorn, Joshua Eagan, and Matthew Nichols (collectively 

“Defendants”) shall and hereby do have an additional sixteen (16) days to respond to Plaintiff’s 

Second Amended Complaint. Good cause exists for the extension. Following the filing of the 

Second Amended Complaint, the parties have engaged in meet and confer in an effort to avoid 

further motion practice and need additional time to allow the parties to do so. 

Pursuant to this stipulated agreement, Defendants shall and do now have until August 31, 

2022 to file a responsive pleading to the Second Amended Complaint. 

Case 2:21-cv-02182-JAM-JDP Document 26 Filed 08/10/22 Page 1 of 2
{02772605.DOCX} 2 

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR RESPONSIVE PLEADING TO SECOND AMENDED 

COMPLAINT 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

PORTER | SCOTT 

350 University Ave., Suite 200 

Sacramento, CA 95825 

TEL: 916.929.1481 

FAX: 916.927.3706 

So Stipulated. 

 

Dated: August 9, 2022 PORTER SCOTT 

 A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION 

By: /s/ John R. Whitefleet 

John R. Whitefleet 

Attorney for Defendants 

CITY OF AUBURN; JOHN 

RUFFCORN; JOSHUA EAGAN; and 

MATTHEW NICHOLS 

Dated: August 9, 2022 RILEY SAFER HOLMES & CANCILA LLP 

By: /s/ Nick Sherman (auth’d on 08-09-22) 

Nick Sherman 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

DALTON EDWARD DYER 

ORDER 

 Pursuant to the parties’ stipulation the deadline for Defendants to file a responsive pleading 

to the Second Amended Complaint is HEREBY EXTENDED to August 31, 2022. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: August 9, 2022 /s/ John A. Mendez 

 THE HONORABLE JOHN A. MENDEZ 

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 2:21-cv-02182-JAM-JDP Document 26 Filed 08/10/22 Page 2 of 2