Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-16-01878/USCOURTS-ca4-16-01878-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Eugene Milford
Appellant
United States of America
Appellee

Document Text:

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-1878

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

EUGENE MILFORD,

 Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Charleston. Richard Mark Gergel, District 

Judge. (2:15-cv-02009-RMG)

Submitted: January 17, 2017 Decided: January 19, 2017

Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Eugene Milford, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Frank Daley, Jr., 

Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 16-1878 Doc: 17 Filed: 01/19/2017 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Eugene Milford appeals the district court’s order accepting 

the recommendation of the magistrate judge and granting summary 

judgment to the United States on its complaint and on Milford’s 

counterclaims. We have reviewed the record and find no 

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated 

by the district court. United States v. Milford, No. 

2:15-cv-02009-RMG (D.S.C. July 28, 2016). We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before this court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Appeal: 16-1878 Doc: 17 Filed: 01/19/2017 Pg: 2 of 2