Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_13-cv-00814/USCOURTS-caed-1_13-cv-00814-5/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Connie Gipson
Respondent
Guillermo Vera
Petitioner

Document Text:

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma 

pauperis with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 

U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to the Magistrate Judge 

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Local Rules 302 through 304.

On November 20, 2013, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and 

recommendations to deny Petitioner’s motion for entry of judgment 

without prejudice. The findings and recommendations were served on 

all parties on the same date. The findings and recommendations 

advised the parties that objections could be filed within thirty 

days and replies within fourteen days after the filing of 

objections. On May 5, 2014, Petitioner filed objections. Although 

GUILLERMO VERA,

 Petitioner,

v.

CONNIE GIPSON,

Respondent.

Case No. 1:13-cv-00814-AWI-SKO-HC

ORDER RE: FINDINGS AND 

RECOMMENDATIONS (DOC. 18)

ORDER DENYING PETITIONER’S MOTION 

FOR ENTRY OF JUDGMENT (DOC. 16)

Case 1:13-cv-00814-AWI-SKO Document 40 Filed 07/30/14 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

the fourteen-day period for the filing of a reply has passed, no 

reply has been filed. 

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), 

this Court has conducted a de novo review of the case. The Court 

has considered the entire file and has considered the objections; 

the undersigned has determined there is no need to modify the 

findings and recommendations based on the points raised in the 

objections. The Court finds that the report and recommendations are 

supported by the record and proper analysis. 

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that:

1) The findings and recommendations filed on November 20, 2013, 

are ADOPTED in full; and

2) Petitioner’s motion for entry of judgment is DENIED without 

prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 30, 2014 

 SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:13-cv-00814-AWI-SKO Document 40 Filed 07/30/14 Page 2 of 2