Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-14-07761/USCOURTS-ca4-14-07761-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
William Byers
Appellee
Lieutenant Commandeer
Appellee
James Dean
Appellee
B. Durant
Appellee
Sergeant Epps
Appellee
Nurse Floyd
Appellee
Nurse Fulton
Appellee
Lieutenant Goodman
Appellee
Michael B. Lesane
Appellant
Officer Lighty
Appellee
Nurse McCallaster
Appellee
Anthony J. Padula
Appellee
A. Pinkney
Appellee
Nurse Scott
Appellee
Doctor Stein
Appellee

Document Text:

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-7761

MICHAEL B. LESANE, a/k/a Michael Bernard Lesane,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

WILLIAM BYERS, Department of Corrections Director; 

ANTHONY J. PADULA, Warden; JAMES DEAN, Major; A. PINKNEY, 

Captain; B. DURANT, Lieutenant; SERGEANT EPPS; LIEUTENANT 

COMMANDEER; LIEUTENANT GOODMAN; OFFICER LIGHTY, et al; 

DOCTOR STEIN; NURSE FULTON; NURSE SCOTT; NURSE FLOYD; NURSE 

MCCALLASTER, et al,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Charleston. J. Michelle Childs, District 

Judge. (2:12-cv-00508-JMC)

Submitted: May 8, 2015 Decided: May 20, 2015

Before KEENAN, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael B. Lesane, Appellant Pro Se. David Cornwell Holler, LEE 

ERTER WILSON HOLLER & SMITH, LLC, Sumter, South Carolina, for 

Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 14-7761 Doc: 32 Filed: 05/20/2015 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Michael B. Lesane appeals the district court’s order 

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying 

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have 

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, 

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. 

Lesane v. Byers, No. 2:12-cv-00508-JMC (D.S.C. Nov. 3, 2014). 

We deny Lesane’s motion for appointment of counsel and dispense 

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Appeal: 14-7761 Doc: 32 Filed: 05/20/2015 Pg: 2 of 2