Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-07-02113/USCOURTS-ca4-07-02113-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
J. Cater Glass
Appellee
Rhonda Hogge
Appellee
Carol Martin
Appellee
Nationwide Affinity Insurance Company of America
Appellee
Nationwide Claims Department
Appellee
Nationwide Insurance Company
Appellee
Nationwide Loss Adjusters
Appellee
Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company
Appellee
Harold C. Rhudy
Appellee
Sharron Stephen-Henley
Appellee
Arthur Walter
Appellee
Paul Yongo
Appellant

Document Text:

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-2113

PAUL YONGO,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

NATIONWIDE INSURANCE COMPANY; CAROL MARTIN; RHONDA HOGGE, AIC;

NATIONWIDE CLAIMS DEPARTMENT; NATIONWIDE LOSS ADJUSTERS; SHARRON

STEPHEN-HENLEY; ARTHUR WALTER; NATIONWIDE AFFINITY INSURANCE

COMPANY OF AMERICA; NATIONWIDE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY; J.

CATER GLASS; HAROLD C. RHUDY,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever III,

District Judge. (5:07-cv-00094)

Submitted: March 7, 2008 Decided: May 12, 2008

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Appeal: 07-2113 Doc: 20 Filed: 05/12/2008 Pg: 1 of 3
- 2 -

Paul Yongo, Raleigh, North Carolina, Appellant Pro Se. George Lee

Simpson, III, Raleigh, North Carolina; Benjamin E. Thompson, III,

BROUGHTON, WILKINS, SMITH, SUGG & THOMPSON, PLLC, Raleigh, North

Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 07-2113 Doc: 20 Filed: 05/12/2008 Pg: 2 of 3
- 3 -

PER CURIAM:

Paul Yongo seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying his motion to quash the clerk’s order granting the

Defendants’ motion for an enlargement of time to respond to Yongo’s

interrogatories. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over

final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2000), and certain interlocutory

and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2000); Fed. R. Civ. P.

54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949).

The order Yongo seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an

appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we

dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Appeal: 07-2113 Doc: 20 Filed: 05/12/2008 Pg: 3 of 3