Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-02572/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-02572-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Andre Matevousian
Respondent
Son Van Nguyen
Petitioner

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Respondent,

v.

SON VAN NGUYEN,

Movant.

________________________________

SON VAN NGUYEN,

Petitioner,

v.

ANDRE MATEVOUSIAN,

Respondent.

No. 2:99-cr-0433 WBS AC

2:16-cv-1442 WBS AC

RELATED CASE ORDER

No. 2:15-cv-2572 DB P

Examination of the above-entitled actions reveals that these cases are related within the 

meaning of Local Rule 123(a). The actions involve the same transaction or event and similar 

questions of fact and law. Accordingly, assignment of the matters to the same judge is likely to 

effect a substantial saving of judicial effort and is also likely to be convenient for the parties.

The parties should be aware that relating the cases under Local Rule 123 merely has the 

Case 2:15-cv-02572-AC Document 14 Filed 09/15/16 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

result that the actions are assigned to the same magistrate judge; no consolidation of the actions is 

effected. Under the regular practice of this court, related cases are generally assigned to the judge 

or magistrate judge to whom the first filed action was assigned.

Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the action denominated as 2:15-cv-2572 DB P is 

reassigned to Magistrate Judge Allison Claire1 for all further proceedings, and any dates currently 

set in the reassigned case only are hereby VACATED. Henceforth, the caption on documents 

filed in the reassigned case shall be shown as No. 2:15-cv-2572 AC P.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court make appropriate adjustment in 

the assignment of civil cases to compensate for this reassignment. 

DATED: September 15, 2016

 1

 Because the parties in 2:15-cv-2572 DB P have consented to magistrate judge jurisdiction (ECF 

Nos. 7, 11), that case will be reassigned only as to the magistrate judge and will not be assigned 

to the district judge presiding over 2:99-cr-0433 WBS AC. 

Case 2:15-cv-02572-AC Document 14 Filed 09/15/16 Page 2 of 2