Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-09-07972/USCOURTS-ca4-09-07972-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Lyndell Thomas
Appellant
United States of America
Appellee

Document Text:

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-7972

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

LYNDELL THOMAS, a/k/a X-Man,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of North Carolina, at Fayetteville. W. Earl Britt, 

Senior District Judge. (3:93-cr-00058-BR-3)

Submitted: March 30, 2010 Decided: April 5, 2010

Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Lyndell Thomas, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Jack Higdon, Jr., 

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., 

Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 09-7972 Doc: 14 Filed: 04/05/2010 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Lyndell Thomas appeals the district court’s order 

denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006) motion. We have reviewed 

the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm 

for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. 

Thomas, No. 3:93-cr-00058-BR-3 (E.D.N.C. Oct. 13, 2009). We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Appeal: 09-7972 Doc: 14 Filed: 04/05/2010 Pg: 2 of 2