Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_08-mc-80031/USCOURTS-cand-3_08-mc-80031-2/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Google Inc.
3rd party defendant
Research in Motion Limited
Defendant
Visto Corporation
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1 

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE HEARING ON MOTION TO QUASH, 

OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, FOR A PROTECTIVE ORDER

414682.01 

KEKER & VAN NEST, LLP 

MICHAEL H. PAGE - #154913 

ASHOK RAMANI - #200020 

KHARI J. TILLERY - #215669 

710 Sansome Street 

San Francisco, CA 94111-1704 

Telephone: (415) 391-5400 

Facsimile: (415) 397-7188 

Attorneys for Third-Party Google Inc. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

VISTO CORPORATION, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

RESEARCH IN MOTION LIMITED, et al., 

Defendant. 

 Misc. Civil Case No. CV-08-80031-MISC-JL 

Court of Original Jurisdiction 

U.S. Dist. Ct. 

E. Dist. Texas 

Marshall Division 

Case No. 2-06-CV-181-TJW 

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE 

HEARING ON MOTION TO QUASH, OR 

IN THE ALTERNATIVE, FOR A 

PROTECTIVE ORDER 

RECITAL

On February 1, 2008, Visto Corporation issued a subpoena to third party Google Inc. in 

the matter of Visto Corporation v. Research in Motion Limited, et al., Eastern District of Texas 

Case No. 2:06-CV-181 (TJW). 

On March 10, 2008, Google filed a motion to quash the subpoena, or in the alternative, 

for a protective order, which is now pending before this Court and scheduled for hearing on 

April 23, 2008. 

Visto and Google are currently working together to negotiate a compromise that, if 

successful, would resolve the subpoena and render Google’s motion moot. 

Case 3:08-mc-80031-JSW Document 27 Filed 04/07/2008 Page 1 of 2 Case 3:08-mc-80031-JSW Document 30 Filed 04/08/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2 

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE HEARING ON MOTION TO QUASH, 

OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, FOR A PROTECTIVE ORDER

414682.01 

Given these ongoing negotiations, Visto and Google agree that it would be prudent to 

continue the hearing from April 23 to May 7, 2008 to avoid any unnecessary briefing by the 

parties or work by the Court. 

STIPULATION

For the foregoing reasons, the parties, through their undersigned counsel, stipulate and 

agree to continue the hearing date for Google’s motion to quash from April 23 to May 7, 2008 at 

9:30 a.m. The parties further stipulate that Google’s reply brief, by operation of the Civil Local 

Rules, will come due April 23, 2008. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

Dated: April 7, 2008 KEKER & VAN NEST, LLP 

By: /s/ Khari J. Tillery 

KHARI J. TILLERY 

Attorneys for Third Party Google Inc. 

Dated: April 7, 2008 SPIEGEL LIAO & KAGAY, LLP 

By: /s/ Charles M. Kagay 

CHARLES M. KAGAY 

Attorneys for Plaintiff Visto Corporation 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: April__, 2008 

The HONORABLE JAMES LARSON 

United States Magistrate Judge 

Case 3:08-mc-80031-JSW Document 27 Filed 04/07/2008 Page 2 of 2 Case 3:08-mc-80031-JSW Document 30 Filed 04/08/08 Page 2 of 2