Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_15-cv-00110/USCOURTS-caed-1_15-cv-00110-2/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Commissioner of Social Security
Defendant
Carlos Hernandez
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CARLOS HERNANDEZ,

Plaintiff,

v.

CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting 

Commissioner of Social Security

Defendant.

Case No. 1:15-cv-00110-SMS

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS 

ACTION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED

FOR FAILURE TO COMPLY 

WITH THE COURT'S ORDER

Doc. 5

RESPONSE DUE WITHIN FIFTEEN (15) DAYS

On January 22, 2015, Plaintiff Carlos Hernandez, proceeding pro se, filed a complaint 

seeking review of the Commissioner's denial of his application for unspecified disability benefits 

under the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. § 301 et seq.) (the "Act"). On February 2, 2015, after 

screening the complaint, the Court dismissed it with leave to amend within thirty (30) days to 

provide certain omitted information. Although more than thirty (30) days have passed, Plaintiff 

has not filed an amended complaint or responded to the Court's order in any other way.

The Court has discretion to impose any and all sanctions authorized by statute or Rule or 

within the inherent power of the Court, including dismissal of an action, based on Plaintiff’s 

failure to comply with a court order. Fed. R. Civ. P. 11; Local Rule 110.

///

///

Case 1:15-cv-00110-DAD-GSA Document 6 Filed 03/10/15 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Accordingly, the Court hereby ORDERS:

1. Within fifteen (15) days from the date of service of this order, Plaintiff shall file a 

written response to the Court, showing cause why this case should not be dismissed 

for Plaintiff's failure to obey the Court’s order filed February 2, 2015.

2. The Clerk of Court shall mail one copy of this order and of the Court's February 2, 

2015 order (Doc. 5) to Plaintiff.

3. Plaintiff's failure to comply with this order will result in the dismissal of this action 

without further notice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 10, 2015 /s/ Sandra M. Snyder 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:15-cv-00110-DAD-GSA Document 6 Filed 03/10/15 Page 2 of 2