Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_13-cv-01588/USCOURTS-caed-1_13-cv-01588-6/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Executive Office for U.S. Attorneys
Defendant
Thuan Huy Ha
Plaintiff
U.S. Department of Justice
Defendant

Document Text:

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Plaintiff Thuan Huy Ha is appearing pro se in this action under the Freedom of Information 

Act, 5 U.S.C. §§ 552 et seq.

 The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 

636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On January 15, 2016, the Magistrate Judge filed a Findings and 

Recommendations (“F&Rs”), which recommended dismissal of this action for failure to follow a court 

order. Doc. 11. The F&Rs were served on Plaintiff and contained notice that objections were to be 

filed within thirty days. Id. The thirty-day time frame has expired and no objections were filed. 

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), the Court has conducted a de 

novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the Findings and 

Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

THUAN HUY HA,

 Plaintiff,

v.

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE AND 

EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR U.S. 

ATTORNEYS,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: 1:13-cv-1588-LJO-MJS

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND 

RECOMMENDATIONS, DISMISSING 

COMPLAINT FOR FAILURE TO FOLLOW A 

COURT ORDER, AND DIRECTING CLERK OF 

COURT TO TERMINATE ACTION

(Doc. 11)

Case 1:13-cv-01588-LJO-MJS Document 12 Filed 04/06/16 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed on January 15, 2016, are adopted in full; and

2. Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint (Doc. 7) is DISMISSED for failure to comply 

with a court order; and 

3. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 6, 2016 /s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:13-cv-01588-LJO-MJS Document 12 Filed 04/06/16 Page 2 of 2