Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_19-cv-00896/USCOURTS-caed-1_19-cv-00896-3/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Timothy Brown
Plaintiff
Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
Defendant

Document Text:

-1-

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Goodman 

Neuman 

Hamilton LLP 

417 Montgomery St.

10th Floor

San Francisco, CA 

94104

Tel.: (415) 705-0400

JOSHUA S. GOODMAN, ESQUIRE - State Bar #116576

ZACHARY S. TOLSON, ESQUIRE - State Bar #242824

GOODMAN NEUMAN HAMILTON LLP

417 Montgomery Street, 10th Floor

San Francisco, California 94104

Telephone: (415) 705-0400

Facsimile: (415) 705-0411

Attorneys for Defendant

HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC. (erroneously sued as THE HOME DEPOT, INC.)

***********************************************

MATTHEW ROSTON, ESQ. - State Bar #265944

ROSTON LAW GROUP, APC

9454 Wilshire Blvd., Ste 850

Beverly Hills, CA 90212

Telephone: (310) 550-6221

Facsimile: (310) 246-0305

Attorneys for Plaintiff

TIMOTHY BROWN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TIMOTHY BROWN,

Plaintiff,

vs.

THE HOME DEPOT, INC.,

Defendant.

Case No. 19-cv-00896-DAD-JLT

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL AND 

[PROPOSED] ORDER

(Doc. 19)

Plaintiff TIMOTHY BROWN and Defendant HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC. (erroneously 

sued as THE HOME DEPOT, INC.) do hereby submit this Stipulated Request for Dismissal 

pursuant to F.R.C.P. Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). The parties have settled the matter and all terms of the 

settlement have been agreed upon and performed. This dismissal of Plaintiff’s claims are with 

prejudice. IT IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD.

DATED: February 20, 2020 GOODMAN NEUMAN HAMILTON LLP

By: /s/ Zachary S. Tolson

ZACHARY S. TOLSON

Attorneys for Defendant HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC.

DATED: February 20, 2020 ROSTON LAW GROUP, APC

By: /s/ Matthew Roston

MATTHEW ROSTON

Attorney for Plaintiff TIMOTHY BROWN

Case 1:19-cv-00896-DAD-JLT Document 20 Filed 02/21/20 Page 1 of 2
-2-

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Goodman 

Neuman 

Hamilton LLP 

417 Montgomery St.

10th Floor

San Francisco, CA 

94104

Tel.: (415) 705-0400

ORDER

The parties have settled their case and have stipulated to the action being dismissed with 

prejudice. (Doc. 19) The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 41 makes such stipulations 

effective immediately with further order of the Court. Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 

692 (9th Cir. 1997). Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to close this action. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 20, 2020 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:19-cv-00896-DAD-JLT Document 20 Filed 02/21/20 Page 2 of 2