Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_16-cv-02041/USCOURTS-cand-4_16-cv-02041-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Electronic Frontier Foundation
Plaintiff
United States Department of Justice
Defendant

Document Text:

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

MARK RUMOLD (SBN 279060)

mark@eff.org

NATHAN D. CARDOZO (SBN 259097)

nate@eff.org

AARON MACKEY (SBN 286647)

amackey@eff.org

ELECTRONIC FRONTIER FOUNDATION

815 Eddy Street

San Francisco, CA 94109

Telephone: (415) 436-9333

Facsimile: (415) 436-9993

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

ELECTRONIC FRONTIER FOUNDATION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

ELECTRONIC FRONTIER FOUNDATION,

Plaintiff,

v.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT 

OF JUSTICE, 

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 16-cv-02041-HSG

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO SET 

BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND VACATE 

CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

Case 4:16-cv-02041-HSG Document 26 Filed 08/02/16 Page 1 of 4
16-cv-02041-HSG STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 1

Pursuant to L. R. 7-12, Plaintiff Electronic Frontier Foundation (“EFF”) and Defendant 

United States Department of Justice hereby stipulate to the proposed briefing schedule for crossmotions for summary judgment in this case outlined below and request that the Court order the 

same. 

(1) As the Joint Case Management Statement (JCMS) filed on July 26, 2016 (ECF No. 23) 

indicated, the parties conferred at various times and significantly narrowed the issues prior to the 

scheduled Case Management Conference (CMC) on August 2, 2016. At the time of filing the JCMS, 

the primary outstanding issue that the parties had yet to reach an agreement on was a schedule or 

plan for cross-motions for summary judgment. The parties continued to confer and have reached 

agreement on a schedule as follows:

September 22, 2016 Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (25 pages)

October 13, 2016 Plaintiff’s Combined Cross-Motion for 

Summary/Judgment/Opposition to Defendant’s Motion (50 pages)

November 3, 2016 Defendant’s Combined Opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion/Reply in 

Support of Their Motion for Summary Judgment (40 pages)

November 17, 2016 Plaintiff’s Reply in Support of Its Motion for Summary Judgment (15 

pages)

December 15, 2016 Requested Hearing Date

(2) In light of the parties’ agreement on the proposed briefing schedule, the parties 

respectfully submit that the scheduled CMC may no longer be necessary. Should the Court agree, the

parties jointly request the Court vacate the CMC scheduled for 2 p.m. on August 2, 2016.

Case 4:16-cv-02041-HSG Document 26 Filed 08/02/16 Page 2 of 4
16-cv-02041-HSG STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 2

August 1, 2016 Respectfully submitted,

By /s/ Aaron Mackey

 Aaron Mackey 

ELECTRONIC FRONTIER FOUNDATION

815 Eddy Street

San Francisco, CA 94109

Attorneys for Plaintiff

August 1, 2016 Respectfully submitted,

BENJAMIN C. MIZER

Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General

MELINDA HAAG

United States Attorney

ELIZABETH J. SHAPIRO

Deputy Branch Director

By /s/

 RODNEY PATTON

Senior Counsel

JULIA A. BERMAN

Trial Attorney

United States Department of Justice

Civil Division, Federal Programs Branch

20 Massachusetts Avenue, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20001

Attorneys for Defendant

DECLARATION PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 5-1(I)(3)

Pursuant to Civil L.R. 5-1(i)(3), I, Aaron Mackey, declare that I obtained the concurrence of 

Rodney Patton, counsel for Defendant, United States Department of Justice, in the filing of this 

document.

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States that the foregoing is 

true and correct. Executed this 1st day of August, 2016 in San Francisco, California

DATED: August 1, 2016 Respectfully submitted,

By /s/ Aaron Mackey

Aaron Mackey 

Case 4:16-cv-02041-HSG Document 26 Filed 08/02/16 Page 3 of 4
16-cv-02041-HSG STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 3

ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. The parties shall file their summary 

judgment briefs in accordance with the schedule above. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED. The Case Management Conference scheduled for 2 p.m. on 

August 2, 2016 is vacated.

DATED: August 2, 2016 __________________________

Hon. HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR.

United States District Court Judge

Case 4:16-cv-02041-HSG Document 26 Filed 08/02/16 Page 4 of 4