Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-02340/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-02340-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Keith Batt
Defendant
City of Oakland
Defendant
Steve Hewison
Defendant
Matthew Hornung
Plaintiff
Jon Madarang
Defendant
Oakland Police Department
Defendant
Richard Word
Defendant

Document Text:

1 

SECOND STIPULATION EXTENDING DEFENDANTS’ TIME 

TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Gregory M. Fox, State Bar No. 070876 

Nancy A. Huneke, State Bar No. 114973 

BERTRAND, FOX & ELLIOT 

The Waterfront Building 

2749 Hyde Street 

San Francisco, California 94109 

Telephone: (415) 353-0999 

Facsimile: (415) 353-0990 

John A. Russo, City Attorney, State Bar No. 129779 

Randolph W. Hall, Chief Assist. City Attorney, State Bar No. 080142 

OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY 

CITY OF OAKLAND 

One Frank Ogawa Plaza, Sixth Floor 

Oakland, California 94612 

Telephone: (510) 238-3601 

Facsimile: (510) 238-6500 

Attorneys for Defendants JON MADARANG, STEVE HEWISON, 

, RICHARD WORD, CITY OF OAKLAND and 

OAKLAND POLICE DEPARTMENT and 

specially appearing for Defendant KEITH BATT 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

MATTHEW HORNUNG, 

 Plaintiff, 

 vs. 

JON MADARANG, individually, and in his 

capacity as a Police Officer with the City of 

Oakland; STEVE HEWISON, individually 

and in his capacity as a Police Officer with the 

City of Oakland; KEITH BATT, individually 

and in his capacity as a Police Officer with the 

City of Pleasanton; RICHARD WORD, 

individually and in his capacity as the Chief of 

Police for the City of Oakland Police 

Department; CITY OF OAKLAND; 

OAKLAND POLICE DEPARTMENT; and 

DOES 1 through 50, inclusive,

 Defendants. 

 Case No.: C 06 2340 MJJ 

SECOND STIPULATION EXTENDING 

DEFENDANTS’ TIME TO RESPOND TO 

PLAINTIFF’S FIRST AMENDED 

COMPLAINT 

Civil Local Rule 6-1(a) 

 

Case 3:06-cv-02340-MJJ Document 6 Filed 05/19/2006 Page 1 of 3

and ORDER

Case 3:06-cv-02340-TEH Document 7 Filed 05/24/06 Page 1 of 3
2 

SECOND STIPULATION EXTENDING DEFENDANTS’ TIME 

TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Plaintiff MATTHEW HORNUNG, by and through his counsel of record Edward Marc 

Fishman of the Law Offices of Edward Marc Fishman, and Defendants JON MADARANG, STEVE 

HEWISON, KEITH BATT, RICHARD WORD, CITY OF OAKLAND and OAKLAND POLICE 

DEPARTMENT, by and through their counsel of record Gregory M. Fox of Bertrand, Fox and Elliot, 

and Mr. Fox also specially appearing on behalf of Defendant KEITH BATT, hereby agree and 

stipulate as follows: 

 Plaintiff filed his complaint on April 3, 2006 and his first amended complaint on Tuesday 

April 25, 2006. All defendants, and each of them, authorized attorney Gregory M. Fox to accept 

service of the first amended complaint on each of their individual behalf. Said service of the first 

amended complaint on all defendants was accomplished by service on Mr. Fox on or before April 28, 

2006. The parties, acting by and through their attorneys, stipulated that defendants’ time to respond 

to the first amended complaint be extended to Friday, May 19, 2006. The Court ordered the 

stipulation. 

 Because of the complexity of the pleadings, especially regarding the naming of defendant 

BATT in both his individual capacity as well as his official capacity as an officer of the Pleasanton 

Police Department (the City of Pleasanton and its Police Department are not named as defendants) 

complications have arisen regarding the representation of defendant BATT. The parties, acting by 

and through their respective legal counsel, are meeting and conferring on the issues and because 

additional time is necessary to resolve these issues the parties stipulate that the defendants, and each 

of them, will file and serve their responsive pleadings to the first amended complaint on or before 

Friday, June 2, 2006. This extension is approximately 30 days from the date of service of the first 

amended complaint on the defendants. 

 

SO STIPULATED. 

Case 3:06-cv-02340-MJJ Document 6 Filed 05/19/2006 Page 2 of 3
 Case 3:06-cv-02340-TEH Document 7 Filed 05/24/06 Page 2 of 3
3 

SECOND STIPULATION EXTENDING DEFENDANTS’ TIME 

TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Dated: May 18, 2006 BERTRAND, FOX & ELLIOT 

 By: /s/ 

 GREGORY M. FOX 

Attorneys for Defendants JON MADARANG, 

STEVE HEWISON,, RICHARD WORD, CITY OF 

OAKLAND and OAKLAND POLICE DEPARTMENT 

and specially appearing for Defendant KEITH BATT 

Dated: May 18, 2006 LAW OFFICES OF EDWARD MARC FISHMAN 

 By: /s/ 

EDWARD MARC FISHMAN 

Attorneys for Plaintiff, MATTHEW HORNUNG 

ATTORNEY ATTESTATION 

I hereby attest that I have on file all holograph signatures for any signatures indicated by a 

“conformed” signature (/s/) within this E-filed document. 

Dated: May 18, 2006 

By: /s/ 

Gregory M. Fox 

Bertrand, Fox & Elliot 

Case 3:06-cv-02340-MJJ Document 6 Filed 05/19/2006 Page 3 of 3

5/24/2006

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Martin J. Jenkins

Case 3:06-cv-02340-TEH Document 7 Filed 05/24/06 Page 3 of 3