Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ared-4_01-cr-00029/USCOURTS-ared-4_01-cr-00029-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Hershel Laron Jones
Defendant
United States of America
Plaintiff

Document Text:

AO Order Regarding Motion for Sentence Reduction

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN Diatj'ii of:n- ARKANSAS

u.f.~fJARDINGMOTION FOR SENTENCE

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA EASTERN~~f)'~~URSUANTTO 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2)

FEB 15 200a

HERSHEL LARON JONES

Defendant's Attorney

JAMES W. McCORMACK, ~K

By: Case Numbe\l:E~:01.CR.00029'01 GTE

USMNumber: 22313·009

3·28·2002 Mark F. Hampton (Ret) . (At Orig. Sentencing)

v.

Date of Original Judgment:

(Or Date of Last Amended Judgment)

Upon motion of D the defendant D the Director ofthe Bureau of Prisons X the court

under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) for a reduction in the term of imprisonment imposed based on a guideline

sentencing range that has subsequently been lowered and made retroactive by the United States Sentencing

Commission pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 994(u), and having considered such motion,

IT IS ORDERED that the motion is:

o DENIED.

X GRANTED and the defendant's previously imposed sentence ofimprisonment of

_84_ months is reduced to _TIME SERVED AS OF MARCH 3, 2008_

I. COURT DETERMINATION OF GUIDELINE RANGE

Previous Offense Level(Prior to

Departure/Variance/Rule 35): _33 _

Criminal History Category: _III__

Previous Guideline Range: _168_to_210_months

Amended Offense Level: 31 _

Criminal History Category:_II1__

Amended Guideline Range: _135 _to_1 68_months

II. SENTENCE RELATIVE TO AMENDED GUIDELINE RANGE

D The reduced sentence is within the amended guideline range.

D The original term of imprisonment imposed was less than the guideline range applicable to the defendant

at the time ofsentencing and the reduced sentence is below the amended guideline range.

X Other (specify) - The reduced sentence is consistent with the Rule 35 reduction previously imposed

(112 of the originally imposed guideline sentence of 168 months).

III. FURTHER EXPLANATION (e.g., recommendations to the Bureau of Prisons) (if necessary)

Except as provided above, all provisions ofthe judgment dated _1/10/2002__shall remain in effect.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

.~~I;; , OO(

Order Date Signature ofJudge

_March 3, 2008 ---,--_-,-----

Effective Date (if delayed)

G. Thomas Eisele, Sr. District Judge

Name and Title ofJudge

Case 4:01-cr-00029-GTE Document 48 Filed 02/15/08 Page 1 of 1