Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_16-cv-00851/USCOURTS-cand-4_16-cv-00851-2/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Alexis Amacker
Plaintiff
Johnson and Johnson
Defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ALEXIS AMACKER,

Plaintiff,

v.

JOHNSON AND JOHNSON,

Defendant.

Case No. 16-cv-00851-DMR 

ORDER RE PLAINTIFF'S SUBMISSION

Re: Dkt. No. 13

On March 16, 2016, the court issued an order granting Plaintiff’s application to proceed In 

Forma Pauperis and dismissing his complaint, due to numerous deficiencies, with leave to amend 

by March 31, 2016. [Docket No. 6.] The court informed Plaintiff that failure to file an amended 

complaint by March 31, 2016 could result in dismissal of the case without prejudice for failure to 

prosecute. [Docket No. 6 at 3.] Plaintiff did not file an amend complaint by March 31, 2016. 

On May 2, 2016, the court received additional papers from Plaintiff. [Docket No. 8.] 

Those papers did not appear to be an amended complaint. The court noted that if they were 

intended to be an amended complaint, they suffered from the same deficiencies identified in the 

court’s prior order. Further, they were not timely, as they were submitted to the court over a 

month after Plaintiff’s deadline to file an amended complaint. Id. 

On May 3, 2016, the court dismissed this action for failure to prosecute and closed the 

case. [Docket No. 8.] The court entered a judgment on May 4, 2016. [Docket No. 9.] Following 

the dismissal, Plaintiff submitted a number of documents and photos which were received by the 

court on May 25, 2016. 

Plaintiff’s complaint has been dismissed. As the case is now closed, the court will not 

respond to further submissions filed under this case number. The clerk is instructed to close the 

case and to return the papers received by the court on May 25, 2016 to Plaintiff. If Plaintiff 

Case 4:16-cv-00851-DMR Document 10 Filed 05/31/16 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

wishes to pursue new claims related to the topic of the documents he has submitted to the court or 

any other subject he is free to file a new complaint.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 31, 2016

______________________________________

Donna M. Ryu

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 4:16-cv-00851-DMR Document 10 Filed 05/31/16 Page 2 of 2