Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_02-cv-06233/USCOURTS-caed-1_02-cv-06233-3/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Derral G. Adams
Respondent
David Laron Tash
Petitioner

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DAVID LARON TASH, )

)

)

Petitioner, )

)

v. )

)

)

DERRAL G. ADAMS, et al., )

)

Respondents. )

 )

CV F 02 6233 WMW HC

ORDER DENYING PETITIONER’S REQUEST

FOR CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY

(Doc. 54)

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c)(1), the parties have consented to

the jurisdiction of the United States Magistrate Judge. Judgment for Respondent was entered on

January 30, 2006.

Petitioner has filed a notice of appeal, along with a request for a certificate of

appealability. The controlling statute, 28 U.S.C. § 2253, provides as follows:

(a) In a habeas corpus proceeding or a proceeding under section 2255 before a

district judge, the final order shall be subject to review, on appeal, by the court of

appeals for the circuit in which the proceeding is held.

(b) There shall be no right of appeal from a final order in a proceeding to test the

validity of a warrant to remove to another district or place for commitment or trial

a person charged with a criminal offense against the United States, or to test the

Case 1:02-cv-06233-WMW Document 55 Filed 02/14/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

validity of such person's detention pending removal proceedings.

(c)(1) Unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability, an appeal

may not be taken to the court of appeals from–

(A) the final order in a habeas corpus proceeding in which the detention

complained of arises out of process issued by a State court; or

(B) the final order in a proceeding under section 2255.

 (2) A certificate of appealability may issue under paragraph (1) only if the applicant

has made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.

 

 (3) The certificate of appealability under paragraph (1) shall indicate which specific

issue or issues satisfy the showing required by paragraph (2).

 

In the present case, the Court finds that Petitioner has not made the required substantial

showing of the denial of a constitutional right so as to justify the issuance of a certificate of

appealability. Accordingly, Petitioner’s request for a Certificate of Appealability is DENIED. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 14, 2006 /s/ William M. Wunderlich 

bl0dc4 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:02-cv-06233-WMW Document 55 Filed 02/14/06 Page 2 of 2