Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca8-05-03543/USCOURTS-ca8-05-03543-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Bobby Jack Stanley
Appellant
United States of America
Appellee

Document Text:

1

The Honorable Robert T. Dawson, United States District Judge for the Western

District of Arkansas.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 05-3543

___________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* Western District of Arkansas.

Bobby Jack Stanley, *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellant. *

___________

Submitted: June 6, 2006

Filed: June 9, 2006

___________

Before MELLOY, FAGG, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Bobby Jack Stanley pleaded guilty to distribution of methamphetamine, and

was sentenced to 12 months and 1 day in prison and 3 years of supervised release.

After Stanley began serving his supervised release, the probation officer petitioned to

revoke supervised release alleging that Stanley had violated his release conditions.

At a subsequent revocation hearing, Stanley admitted violating the conditions of his

supervised release as alleged. The district court1

 revoked supervised release and

imposed a new sentence of 9 months imprisonment, commenting on the Chapter 7

Appellate Case: 05-3543 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/09/2006 Entry ID: 2054453
-2-

Guidelines recommended revocation range, Stanley’s prior and current supervised

release violations, and the leniency of the sentence that he had received for his original

offense. Stanley appeals his revocation sentence.

The revocation sentence was within authorized limits, and the district court

considered appropriate factors in imposing it. See 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(3). We

conclude that Stanley’s sentence is not unreasonable. See United States v. Tyson, 413

F.3d 824, 825 (8th Cir. 2005) (standard of review). 

Accordingly, we affirm, and we also grant counsel’s motion to withdraw. 

______________________________

Appellate Case: 05-3543 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/09/2006 Entry ID: 2054453