Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-09-07843/USCOURTS-ca4-09-07843-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Joe Asensio
Appellee
Norris Byrnes
Appellee
Harry James Cascio
Appellant
Government of Baltimore County
Appellee
Karen Jones
Appellee
State of Maryland
Appellee

Document Text:

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-7843

HARRY JAMES CASCIO,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

STATE OF MARYLAND; GOVERNMENT OF BALTIMORE COUNTY; NORRIS 

BYRNES, Retired Judge; KAREN JONES, Ms., Esq.; JOE ASENSIO,

Mr., Esq.,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

Maryland, at Greenbelt. Roger W. Titus, District Judge. (8:09-

cv-01938-RWT)

Submitted: March 30, 2010 Decided: April 2, 2010

Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Harry James Cascio, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 09-7843 Doc: 14 Filed: 04/02/2010 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Harry James Cascio appeals the district court’s order 

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We 

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district 

court. Cascio v. State of Maryland, No. 8:09-cv-01938-RWT 

(D. Md. Sept. 2, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because 

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before the court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Appeal: 09-7843 Doc: 14 Filed: 04/02/2010 Pg: 2 of 2