Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-04273/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-04273-2/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Environmental Defense
Plaintiff
Stephen L. Johnson
Defendant
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Stipulation to Extend Certain Deadlines 

Environmental Defense v. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Case No.C 06 4273 EMC Page 1 

George E. Hays (State Bar No. 119904)

Attorney at Law

236 West Portal Avenue, #110

San Francisco, CA 94127

Tel: (415) 566-5414

Fax: (415) 731-1609

E-mail: georgehays@mindspring.com

Reed Zars (WY Bar No. 6-3224)

Attorney at Law

910 Kearney Street

Laramie, Wyoming 82070

Tel: (307) 745-7979

Fax: (307) 745-7999

E-mail: rzars@lariat.org

Application pending for admission pro hac vice

Attorneys for Environmental Defense, Plaintiff

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Environmental Defense, 

Plaintiff,

vs.

The United States Environmental

Protection Agency and Stephen L.

Johnson, Administrator of the United

States Environmental Protection Agency, 

Defendants.

_________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. C 06 4273 EMC 

STIPULATION TO EXTEND

CERTAIN DEADLINES

Pursuant to Local Rules 6-1, 6-2, and 7-12, Plaintiff Environmental Defense

(“ED”) and Defendants United States Environmental Protection Agency and

Stephen L. Johnson, Administrator (“EPA”) hereby stipulate to extend the

following deadlines. Currently, ED’s Opposition to Defendant’s Motion for

Judgment on the Pleadings is due November 10. EPA’s Reply Brief is due

November 17. A hearing on the motion is scheduled for December 1, 2006. A

case management conference is also scheduled for that day.

Case 3:06-cv-04273-SC Document 20 Filed 11/15/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Stipulation to Extend Certain Deadlines 

Environmental Defense v. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Case No.C 06 4273 EMC Page 2 

The parties stipulate and respectfully request that all of these deadlines be

extended as follows: ED’s Opposition Brief would be due November 14. EPA’s

Reply Brief would be due November 22. The hearing on the motion and the case

management conference would occur on December 8, 2006.

The parties have agreed to extend these deadlines in order to accommodate

a conflict in the work schedule of the undersigned counsel for ED. Previously, the

parties agreed to extend the time for EPA to file its answer by two weeks.

Wherefore, the parties stipulate to extend time for ED to respond to EPA’s

Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings until November 14, 2006, for EPA to file

its Reply Brief until November 22, 2006, for the hearing on the Motion to Dismiss

until December 8, 2006, and for the case management conference until December

8, 2006.

FOR PLAINTIFF ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE:

s/George E. Hays Dated: November 9, 2006

GEORGE E. HAYS (State Bar No. 119904)

Attorney at Law

236 West Portal Avenue, #110

San Francisco, CA 94127

(415) 566-5414

Fax: (415) 731-1609

georgehays@mindspring.com

FOR DEFENDANT EPA:

s/ Pamela S. Tonglao Dated: November 9, 2006

PAMELA S. TONGLAO

United States Department of Justice

Environment & Natural Resources Division

Environmental Defense Section

P.O. Box 23986

Washington, D.C. 20026-3986

(202) 305-0897

Fax: (202) 514-8865

pamela.tonglao@usdoj.gov

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

___________________ ___________________________________

DATED UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

11/14/06

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Samuel Conti

Case 3:06-cv-04273-SC Document 20 Filed 11/15/06 Page 2 of 2