Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ared-4_19-cv-00407/USCOURTS-ared-4_19-cv-00407-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Does
Defendant
Leodis Randle
Plaintiff

Document Text:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS

CENTRAL DIVISION

LEODIS RANDLE PLAINTIFF

v. Case No. 4:19-cv-00407-KGB

DOES DEFENDANTS

ORDER

Before the Court are the Proposed Findings and Recommendation submitted by United 

States Magistrate Judge Patricia S. Harris (Dkt. No. 3). Also before the Court is plaintiff Leodis 

Randle’s belated motion to amend his complaint (Dkt. No. 4). In her Proposed Findings and 

Recommendation, Judge Harris recommends that Mr. Randle’s complaint be dismissed without 

prejudice for failure to pay the filing fee. No objections have been filed to the Proposed Findings 

and Recommendation, and the deadline for filing objections has since passed. Further, Mr. 

Randle’s motion to amend his complaint does not address the matters raised in Judge Harris’s 

Proposed Findings and Recommendation. Mr. Randle has not submitted a completed application 

to proceed in forma pauperis or paid the required filing fee. After careful consideration, the Court 

finds no reason to alter or reject Judge Harris’ recommendation.

Therefore, the Court adopts the Proposed Findings and Recommendation in their entirety 

as this Court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law (Dkt. No. 3). The Court dismisses Mr. 

Randle’s complaint without prejudice. The Court denies Mr. Randle’s motion to amend his 

complaint (Dkt. No. 4).

It is so ordered this 27th day of January, 2020.

_________________________________

Kristine G. Baker

United States District Judge

Case 4:19-cv-00407-KGB Document 5 Filed 01/27/20 Page 1 of 1