Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_15-cv-01651/USCOURTS-caed-1_15-cv-01651-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Caylin Delk
Plaintiff
Ulta Salon, Cosmetics and Fragrance, Inc.
Defendant

Document Text:

Joint Stipulation and Order Vacating Pre-Trial Scheduling Order and Trial Date

Page 1 of 4

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

MAYALL HURLEY P.C.

ROBERT J. WASSERMAN (SBN: 258538)

rwasserman@mayallaw.com

WILLIAM J. GORHAM (SBN: 151773)

wgorham@mayallaw.com

NICHOLAS J. SCARDIGLI (SBN: 249947)

nscardigli@mayallaw.com

VLADIMIR J. KOZINA (SBN: 284645)

vjkozina@mayallaw.com

2453 Grand Canal Boulevard

Stockton, California 95207-8253

Telephone: (209) 477-3833

Facsimile: (209) 477-4818

Attorneys for Plaintiff CAYLIN DELK

JOHN C. KLOOSTERMAN, Bar No. 182625

jkloosterman@littler.com

JESSICA L. MARINELLI, Bar No. 271707

jmarinelli@littler.com

333 Bush Street, 34th Floor

San Francisco, CA 94104

Telephone: 415.433.1940

Facsimile: 415.399.8490

Attorneys for Defendant

ULTA SALON, COSMETICS & 

FRAGRANCE, INC.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CAYLIN DELK,

Plaintiff,

vs.

ULTA SALON, COSMETICS AND 

FRAGRANCE, INC., a corporation; and 

DOES 1-100, inclusive,

Defendants.

Case No. 1:15-cv-01651 TLN SKO

JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER 

VACATING PRE-TRIAL 

SCHEDULING ORDER AND TRIAL 

DATE

Complaint Filed: September 17, 2015

Trial Date: March 19, 2018

Pursuant to Eastern District of California Local Rule 144, Plaintiff Caylin Delk (“Delk”) 

and Defendant Ulta Salon, Cosmetics and Fragrance, Inc. (“Defendant”) (collectively, the 

“Parties”), by and through their undersigned counsel of record, file this joint stipulation to vacate 

the pre-trial scheduling order and trial date.

Case 1:15-cv-01651-TLN-SKO Document 24 Filed 03/07/17 Page 1 of 4
Joint Stipulation and Order Vacating Pre-Trial Scheduling Order and Trial Date

Page 2 of 4

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WHEREAS, on December 22, 2016, Delk filed a Motion for Leave to file a Second 

Amended Complaint (“Motion”) seeking to add class allegations and two additional causes of 

action. Wasserman Dec. ¶ 2; 

WHEREAS, the Hearing on Delk’s Motion was scheduled to occur on January 26, 2017. 

Wasserman Dec. ¶ 3; 

WHEREAS, pursuant to the Court’s Order (Document No. 22), Delk’s Motion was 

submitted without oral argument and the Hearing was vacated. Wasserman Dec. ¶ 4; Exhibit A.

WHEREAS, the Court has not yet issued a ruling on Delk’s Motion. Wasserman Dec. ¶ 5; 

WHEREAS, the Parties have effectively stayed discovery in this matter pending the Court’s 

ruling on Plaintiff’s Motion in the interest of cost and efficiency. Wasserman Dec. ¶ 6;

WHEREAS, the Parties have significant additional discovery to conduct regardless of the 

outcome of Plaintiff’s Motion. Wasserman Dec. ¶ 7;

WHEREAS, pursuant to the Pre-Trial Scheduling Order (Document No. 15), all discovery 

in this matter is to be completed by April 21, 2017. Wasserman Dec. ¶ 8; 

WHEREAS, the Parties have not previously requested an extension of the Court’s Pretrial 

Scheduling Order deadlines. Wasserman Dec. ¶ 9; and

WHEREAS, the Parties have met and conferred regarding the foregoing, and: (a) agree that 

extra time is necessary to complete fact and expert discovery; (b) agree that a continuance of the 

pre-trial deadlines and trial date will not prejudice the Parties and is in the interests of justice; and 

(c) prefer to set a new scheduling order once the pleadings are set and the issues are framed. 

Wasserman Dec. ¶ 10.

WHEREFORE, with this Joint Stipulation, the Parties jointly request the following:

1. The Court vacate the Pre-Trial Scheduling Order, including all discovery

and pre-trial motion deadlines as well as the trial date; and 

2. The Parties be ordered to file a new Joint Status Report, including a 

proposed scheduling order, within 30 days of the Court’s ruling on Delk’s Motion.

Case 1:15-cv-01651-TLN-SKO Document 24 Filed 03/07/17 Page 2 of 4
Joint Stipulation and Order Vacating Pre-Trial Scheduling Order and Trial Date

Page 3 of 4

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 MAYALL HURLEY P.C.

By /s/ Robert J. Wasserman 

 ROBERT J. WASSERMAN

 VLADIMIR J. KOZINA

 Attorneys for Plaintiff, 

 CAYLIN DELK

 LITTLER MENDLESON P.C.

By /s/ John C. Kloosterman 

 JOHN C. KLOOSTERMAN

 JESSICAL. MARINELLI

 Attorneys for Defendant, 

 ULTA SALON, COSMETICS

 FRAGRANCE, INC.

Case 1:15-cv-01651-TLN-SKO Document 24 Filed 03/07/17 Page 3 of 4
Joint Stipulation and Order Vacating Pre-Trial Scheduling Order and Trial Date

Page 4 of 4

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Pursuant to Eastern District of California Local Rule 144, stipulation of the parties hereto, 

and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows:

1. The Pre-Trial Scheduling Order (Document No. 15), including all discovery and 

pre-trial motion deadlines as well as the trial date, is hereby VACATED; and 

2. The Parties are ORDERED to file a new Joint Status Report, including a proposed 

scheduling order, within 30 days of the Court’s ruling on Delk’s Motion.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: March 06, 2017

Case 1:15-cv-01651-TLN-SKO Document 24 Filed 03/07/17 Page 4 of 4