Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-03478/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-03478-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Doug Mann
Defendant
Mann Bracken, LLC
Defendant
Zenaida E. Quicho
Plaintiff
Edward Reilly
Defendant

Document Text:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

 CASE NO.

Plaintiff(s), 

 

v. STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]

ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS 

Defendant(s).

_______________________________/

Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the

following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5: 

The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process: 

Court Processes:

9 Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4)

9 Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5)

9 Mediation (ADR L.R. 6)

(Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is

appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any other form of ADR, must participate in an

ADR phone conference and may not file this form. They must instead file a Notice of Need for

ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5) 

Private Process:

9 Private ADR (please identify process and provider) ______________________

_____________________________________________________________________________

The parties agree to hold the ADR session by: 

9 the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the order

referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered. ) 

9 other requested deadline _____________________________________________

Dated:___________ ____________________________

Attorney for Plaintiff

Dated:____________ ____________________________

Attorney for Defendant

MANN BRACKEN, LLC; DOUG MANN; 

EDWARD REILLY,

ZENAIDA E. QUICHO, individually and on 

behalf of all others similarly situated, Clear Form ✔

✔

C 07 3478 BZ 10/4/07 10/4/07 Irving L. Berg /s/ The Berg Law Group Alisha Lee /s/ Mann Bracken, LLC

Case 3:07-cv-03478-BZ Document 14 Filed 10/22/07 Page 1 of 2
[PROPOSED] ORDER

Pursuant to the Stipulation above, the captioned matter is hereby referred to: 

9 Non-binding Arbitration 

9 Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE)

9 Mediation

9 Private ADR 

Deadline for ADR session

9 90 days from the date of this order.

9 other ___________________

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated:________________ ___________________________________

UNITED STATES JUDGE

Oct. 22, 2007

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Bernard Zimmerman

✔

✔

MAGISTRATE

Case 3:07-cv-03478-BZ Document 14 Filed 10/22/07 Page 2 of 2