Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-01681/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-01681-3/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
F&G Research, Inc.
Defendant
Primax Electronics LTD.
Plaintiff

Document Text:

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

PRIMAX ELECTRONICS LTD,

Plaintiff,

 v.

F&G RESEARCH, INC.,

Defendant.

 /

No. C 05-01681 JSW

ORDER RE BRIEFING

SCHEDULE

Following the hearing on F&G Research, Inc.’s motions to dismiss for lack of subject matter

jurisdiction, to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction, and to transfer, the Court has considered

Plaintiff Primax Electronics Ltd.’s argument that the facts of record are sufficient to establish personal

jurisdiction in light of the rationale set forth in Akro Corp. v. Luker, 45 F.3d 1541 (Fed. Cir. 1995). 

The Court finds that limited and expedited jurisdictional further briefing on the issue of personal

jurisdiction is warranted. Accordingly, the parties are directed to comply with the deadlines set forth

on the record at the hearing. 

The Court shall notify the parties as to whether a further hearing is required and shall reserve

ruling on the motions to transfer and to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction pending

submission of the supplemental briefs on personal jurisdiction. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 15, 2005 /s/ Jeffrey S. White 

JEFFREY S. WHITE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE