Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-24-01712/USCOURTS-ca4-24-01712-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Mahesh Aditya
Appellee
Chrysler Capital
Appellee
Bruce Jackson
Appellee
Eric Laney
Appellee
Christopher Pfirman
Appellee
Santander Consumer Holdings
Appellee
Richard Eugene Warren
Appellant

Document Text:

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 24-1712

RICHARD EUGENE WARREN,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

MAHESH ADITYA, Individually, Vice Chair Santander Holdings, et al.; 

SANTANDER CONSUMER HOLDINGS; BRUCE JACKSON, Individually, 

President Chrysler Capital; ERIC LANEY, Individually, Chief Financial Officer; 

CHRISTOPHER PFIRMAN, Individually, General Counsel; CHRYSLER 

CAPITAL,

 Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at 

Richmond. David J. Novak, District Judge. (3:23-cv-00719-DJN)

Submitted: December 17, 2024 Decided: January 13, 2025

Before GREGORY, AGEE, and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Richard Eugene Warren, Appellant Pro Se. Blaec C. Croft, MCGUIREWOOD, LLP, 

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 24-1712 Doc: 19 Filed: 01/13/2025 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Richard Eugene Warren appeals the district court’s order granting Defendants’ Fed. 

R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss and dismissing Warren’s second amended complaint 

with prejudice. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, 

we affirm the district court’s order. Warren v. Aditya, No. 3:23-cv-00719-DJN (E.D. Va. 

June 24, 2024). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions 

are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

USCA4 Appeal: 24-1712 Doc: 19 Filed: 01/13/2025 Pg: 2 of 2