Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-04718/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-04718-3/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Aqua Dynamics Systems, Inc.
Defendant
Levi Strauss & Co.,
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

11994084.1

- Case No. 15-4718-WHO

ORDER STAYING ARBITRATION PROCEEDING

HANSON BRIDGETT LLP

ROBERT A. McFARLANE, SBN 172650

rmcfarlane@hansonbridgett.com

RUSSELL C. PETERSEN, SBN 264245

russ.petersen@hansonbridgett.com

425 Market Street, 26th Floor

San Francisco, California 94105

Telephone: (415) 777-3200

Facsimile: (415) 541-9366

Attorneys for Plaintiff

LEVI STRAUSS & CO.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LEVI STRAUSS & CO.,

Plaintiff,

v.

AQUA DYNAMICS SYSTEMS, INC.,

Defendant.

CASE NO. 15-4718-WHO

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION 

STAYING ARBITRATION 

PROCEEDING

The court having considered the Stipulation of the parties and good cause appearing, orders 

as follows:

1. The Arbitration (JAMS Reference No. 1100082177) shall be and hereby is stayed 

until this Court rules on Aqua Dynamics’ motion to dismiss or stay this action;

2. If the Court denies Aqua Dynamics’ motion to dismiss or stay, the Arbitration shall 

be stayed pursuant to this order until this Court enters final judgment in this action, or this action 

is otherwise dismissed in its entirety; 

3. The hearing on LS&Co.'s motion for preliminary injunction now scheduled for 

March 30 is vacated (This order relates only to LS&Co.'s motion for preliminary injunction. It 

does not affect the hearing on Aqua's motion to dismiss or stay.); and

Case 3:15-cv-04718-WHO Document 32 Filed 03/01/16 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

11994084.1

-2- Case No. 15-4718 WHO

ORDER STAYING ARBITRATION PROCEEDING

4. During the pendency of the stay set forth in the preceding two paragraphs, Aqua 

Dynamics shall not initiate or otherwise pursue any further arbitral proceedings against LS&Co.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

By: 

Honorable William H. Orrick

United States District Court Judge

February 29, 2016

Case 3:15-cv-04718-WHO Document 32 Filed 03/01/16 Page 2 of 2