Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-01317/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-01317-11/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Anlin Industries, Inc.
Counter Defendant
Paul Burgess
Counter Claimant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 The Court directs Defendant to Local Rule 56-260, which sets forth the procedural requirements for a 1

summary judgment motion. To the extent that Defendant has provided the necessary documents in his January 22,

2007, filing, the Court will consider the filings and evidence submitted therewith in both Plaintiff’s motion for

summary judgment and Defendant’s cross-motion. 

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ANLIN INDUSTRIES, INC., a California )

corporation )

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. )

)

PAUL BURGESS, )

)

)

)

Defendant. )

 )

1:05cv1317 DLB

ORDER CONTINUING HEARING ON

PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY

JUDGMENT AND DEFENDANT’S CROSSMOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND

SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE

Date: February 13, 2007

Time: 9:30 a.m.

Courtroom 9

Plaintiff Anlin Industries, Inc. (“Plaintiff”) filed a motion for summary judgment on

December 21, 2007. On January 12, 2007, Defendant Paul Burgess (“Defendant”) filed his

opposition to the motion along with his own cross-motion for summary judgment.1

Defendant is entitled to file a cross-motion for summary judgment, but Plaintiff must be

given an opportunity to respond. Therefore, the Court is continuing the hearing on the two

summary judgment motions to February 13, 2007, at 9:30 a.m., in Courtroom 9. It is most

efficient to hear the two motions together, and continuing the hearing will also ensure that the

Case 1:05-cv-01317-DLB Document 98 Filed 01/24/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

state of the pleadings is final given Defendant’s motion to amend, set for hearing on January 26,

2007.

Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment is fully briefed. Should the parties wish to

submit further briefing, permission from the Court will be necessary. The briefing schedule for

Defendant’s cross-motion is as follows: Plaintiff’s opposition will be due on Tuesday, January

30, 2007, and Defendant’s reply, if any, will be due on Friday, February 2, 2007.

 IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: January 24, 2007 /s/ Dennis L. Beck 

3b142a UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:05-cv-01317-DLB Document 98 Filed 01/24/07 Page 2 of 2