Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-01452/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-01452-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
AT&T Corporation
Counter-claimant
O1 Communications, Inc.
Counter-defendant

Document Text:

___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

(San Francisco Division)

O1 COMMUNICATIONS, INC.

 Plaintiff,

v.

AT&T CORPORATION

 Defendant

Case No. 3:16-cv-01452-VC

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING 

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME

Motion Served: April 26, 2016

Current Response Date: May 9, 2016

New Response Date: May 24, 2016

New Reply Date: June 1, 2016

New Hearing Date: June 16, 2016

On May 6, 2016, Plaintiff O1 Communications, Inc. (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant AT&T 

Corporation stipulated and agreed to requested a two-week continuance in the dates for 

Plaintiff’s Response and Defendant’s Reply to the Motion to Dismiss. 

Pursuant to Local Rule 6-2 of the United States District Court for the Northern District 

of California, the parties may stipulate to extend the time for filings that would affect the date 

of an event or deadline already fixed by Court order. 

The new deadlines for the Response and Reply necessitate rescheduling the hearing date 

for the Motion.

GOOD CAUSE SHOWN, the Court approves the Stipulations and ORDERS Plaintiffs 

to respond to the Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss by May 24, 2016, and Defendants to reply by 

June 1, 2016. Further, the hearing date is extended until June 16, 2016.

Dated this ___ day of May, 2016.

By: _______________________

Judge Vince Chhabria

9th

Case 3:16-cv-01452-VC Document 28 Filed 05/09/16 Page 1 of 1