Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-00903/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-00903-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Joseph Abdullah
Counter Defendant
Francis Pio Cammarota
Defendant
John Robert Roccanova
Counter Claimant
James Vincent Roccanova
Counter Claimant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

1

DECLARATION OF REUBEN D. NATHAN IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST TO

CONTINUE THE SCHEDULING CONFERENCE AS A RESULT OF RECENT FILING OF

THE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

Reuben D. Nathan, Esq. (SBN 208436) 

AZIMY & NATHAN, LLP

18500 Von Karman Avenue, Suite 500

Irvine, California 92612

Tel: (949) 486-1888

Fax: (949) 486-1889

Email: r.n@azimynathan.com

 e.a@azimynathan.com

Attorneys for Plaintiff, JOSEPH ABDULLAH

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOSEPH ABDULLAH,

 Plaintiff(s),

vs.

JOHN ROBERT ROCCANOVA; JAMES

VINCENT ROCCANOVA and Does 1

through 10, inclusive.

 Defendant(s).

Case No.: 2:06-CV-00903-WBS DAD

DECLARATION OF REUBEN D.

NATHAN IN SUPPORT OF

PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST TO

CONTINUE THE SCHEDULING

CONFERENCE AS A RESULT OF

RECENT FILING OF THE FIRST

AMENDED COMPLAINT AND ORDER

DECLARATION OF REUBEN D. NATHAN

I, Reuben D. Nathan declare as follows:

1. I am an attorney licensed to practice law in all of the courts in the State of California,

Central District of California, Eastern District of California and Northern District of California. Azimy

& Nathan, LLP are the attorneys of record for Plaintiff, Joseph Abdullah (hereinafter referred to as

“Plaintiff”) in the case entitled Abdullah v. John Robert Roccanova, et al.

Case 2:06-cv-00903-WBS-DAD Document 15 Filed 07/18/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

2

DECLARATION OF REUBEN D. NATHAN IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST TO

CONTINUE THE SCHEDULING CONFERENCE AS A RESULT OF RECENT FILING OF

THE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

2. That on July 10, 2006, Plaintiff filed Notice of Dismissal of Defendant Francis Pio

Cammarota, the individual that was believed to be the property owner of the Facility that is the subject

of this lawsuit. On July 11, 2006, Plaintiff filed a First Amended Complaint against John Robert

Roccanova and James Vincent Roccanova, the current owners of the property in question, alleging

violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act, the Unruh Civil Rights Act, Negligence and

California Health and Safety Code §19955, et seq.

8. Plaintiff respectfully requests that the scheduling conference, currently set to be heard on

July 31, 2006 at 9:00 a.m. before the Honorable William B. Shubb be continued for a period of sixty

(60) days to allow Plaintiff time to serve Defendants, John Robert Roccanova and James Vincent

Roccanova with the Summons and First Amended Complaint.

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is

true and correct.

Executed at Irvine, California on July 11, 2006 /s/ Reuben D. Nathan, Esq. 

 Reuben D. Nathan, Declarant

ORDER

Pursuant to the Declaration of Plaintiff’s counsel and finding good cause therefore, it is hereby

ordered that the scheduling conference set to be heard on July 31, 2006 is continued to September 25,

2006 at 9:00 a.m..

IT IS SO ORDERED:

Dated: July 17, 2006

Case 2:06-cv-00903-WBS-DAD Document 15 Filed 07/18/06 Page 2 of 2