Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca5-14-41223/USCOURTS-ca5-14-41223-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Johnny Noe Aparicioabarca
Appellant
United States of America
Appellee

Document Text:

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-41223

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JOHNNY NOE APARICIOABARCA, also known as Johnny Noe Aparcio, also 

known as Jonny Noe Aparicio-Abarea, also known as Jonny Noe Aparicio, also 

known as Johnny Noe Aparcio-Abarca, also known as Jonny Noe Aparicio 

Abarca,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:11-CR-428-1

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DENNIS, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Johnny Noe 

Aparicioabarca has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in 

accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States 

v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Aparicioabarca has filed a response. 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

October 22, 2015

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 14-41223 Document: 00513242483 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/22/2015
No. 14-41223

2

We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record 

reflected therein, as well as Aparicioabarca’s response. We concur with 

counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for 

appellate review. If Aparicioabarca wishes to challenge the Attorney General’s 

decision regarding the calculation of his sentence, he must first exhaust his 

administrative remedies through the Bureau of Prisons and then may file a 

habeas corpus petition pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. See United States v. 

Gabor, 905 F.2d 76, 78 (5th Cir. 1990). Counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw 

is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the 

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 14-41223 Document: 00513242483 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/22/2015