Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca10-16-00604/USCOURTS-ca10-16-00604-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Donald Little
Respondent
Kurosh Motaghed
Respondent
Triumph Gear Systems, Inc.
Petitioner
United States of America
Respondent

Document Text:

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

_________________________________

TRIUMPH GEAR SYSTEMS, INC., 

 Petitioner,

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, EX 

REL. DONALD LITTLE; KUROSH 

MOTAGHED, 

 Respondents.

No. 16-604

(D.C. No. 2:12-CV-00922-DAK)

(D. Utah)

_________________________________

ORDER

_________________________________

Before BRISCOE, LUCERO, and HOLMES, Circuit Judges.

_________________________________

This matter is before the court on Triumph Gear Systems, Inc.’s Petition for 

Permission to File Interlocutory Appeal Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b), Donald Little 

and Kurosh Motaghed’s Answer to Petition for Permission to Appeal Pursuant to 28 

U.S.C. § 1292(b), and Triumph Gear Systems, Inc.’s Motion for Leave to File Reply in 

Support of Its Petition for Permission to File Interlocutory Appeal Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 

§ 1292(b).

We grant the motion for leave to file a reply in support of the petition. See 10th 

Cir. R. 5.1. The reply shall be shown filed as of the date of this order.

Upon careful consideration, we also grant the petition. Within 14 days from the 

date of this order, Triumph Gear Systems, Inc. shall pay the $505 filing fees to the Clerk 

FILED

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

August 10, 2016

Elisabeth A. Shumaker

Clerk of Court

Appellate Case: 16-604 Document: 01019670296 Date Filed: 08/10/2016 Page: 1 
2

of the District of Utah. See Fed. R. App. P. 5(d)(1)(A). A notice of appeal is not required. 

Instead, the date of this order shall serve as the date of the notice of appeal. Id. at 5(d)(2). 

The clerk of this court is directed to open a new appeal when the district court 

notifies this court that the filing fees have been paid. Id. at 5(d)(3).

Briefing will proceed in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 31.

Judge Holmes dissents, and would deny the petition.

Entered for the Court

ELISABETH A. SHUMAKER, Clerk

by: Lindy Lucero Schaible

 Counsel to the Clerk

Appellate Case: 16-604 Document: 01019670296 Date Filed: 08/10/2016 Page: 2