Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_07-cv-04424/USCOURTS-cand-4_07-cv-04424-4/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Anpec Electronics Corp.
Counter-claimant
Maxim Integrated Products, Inc.
Counter-defendant

Document Text:

1 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING

INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

Case No. C 07-04424 PJH

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

David M. Barkan (State Bar No. 160825/barkan@fr.com)

FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.

500 Arguello Street, Suite 500

Redwood City, California 94063

Telephone: (650) 839-5070

Facsimile: (650) 839-5071

Attorneys for Plaintiff

MAXIM INTEGRATED PRODUCTS, INC.

Yitai Hu (State Bar No. 248085/ yhu@akingump.com

Ming-Tao Yang (State Bar No. 168071/ myang@akingump.com

Sean DeBruine (State Bar No. 221295/sdebruine@akingump.com)

AKIN, GUMP, STRAUSS, HAUER & FELD, L.L.P.

Two Palo Alto Square

3000 El Camino Real, Suite 400

Palo Alto, CA 94306

Telephone: (650) 838-2000

Facsimile: (650) 838-2001

Attorneys for Defendant

ANPEC ELECTRONICS CORP.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

MAXIM INTEGRATED PRODUCTS, INC.,

Plaintiff,

v.

ANPEC ELECTRONICS CORP.,

Defendant.

Case No. C 07-04424 PJH

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]

ORDER CONTINUING INITIAL CASE

MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

Plaintiff Maxim Integrated Products, Inc. (“Maxim”) and Defendant Anpec Electronics

Corp. (“Anpec”) hereby stipulate and jointly request that the Court continue the Initial Case

Management Conference scheduled for April 10, 2008. The basis for the parties’ request is a

change of counsel by Maxim that has taken affect this week, substituting Fish & Richardson P.C.

for current Maxim counsel Perkins Coie Brown & Bain P.A.

Case 4:07-cv-04424-PJH Document 52 Filed 04/07/08 Page 1 of 3
2

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING INITIAL

CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

Case No. C 07-04424 PJH

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

In addition to requiring a reasonable amount of time to acquaint themselves with the facts of

the case, the Fish & Richardson attorneys of record each have scheduling conflicts that prevent

either from attending the Initial Case Management Conference on April 10.

In particular, Maxim’s lead trial counsel, David Barkan, will be in Taiwan for depositions in

another matter, and Mr. Colaianni will also be traveling in connection with a different matter and

unable to attend the Initial Case Management Conference on the scheduled date. For this reason,

the parties respectfully request a continuance of the Initial Case Management Conference to any of

May 15, May 22, May 29, or June 5, 2008, or another later date convenient for the Court.

Further, the parties agree to meet and confer promptly and submit a revised Joint Case

Management Statement at least two weeks prior to the continued Initial Case Management

Conference. The parties anticipate being able to cooperatively arrive at a revised procedural

schedule that permits Maxim’s new counsel to become acquainted with the facts and issues of the

case.

Respectfully submitted,

Dated: April 4, 2008

FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.

By: /s/ David M. Barkan__________________

David M. Barkan

Attorneys for Plaintiff

MAXIM INTEGRATED PRODUCTS, INC.

Dated: April 4, 2008

AKIN, GUMP, STRAUSS, HAUER & FELD,

L.L.P.

By: /s/ Sean DeBruine__ ________

Sean DeBruine

Attorneys for Defendant

ANPEC ELECTRONICS CORP.,

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS ORDERED that the Initial Case Management

Conference, which was originally scheduled for April 10, 2008, has been rescheduled and will now

take place on _____________________, 2008.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: ____________________

Honorable. Phyllis J. Hamilton

United States District Court Judge

May 15 4/7/08

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton

Case 4:07-cv-04424-PJH Document 52 Filed 04/07/08 Page 2 of 3
3

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING INITIAL

CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

Case No. C 07-04424 PJH

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DECLARATION

Pursuant to General Order No. 45, Section X(B) regarding signatures, I attest under penalty

of perjury that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from Sean DeBruine.

Dated: April 4, 2008 FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.

By: \s\ David M. Barkan

David M. Barkan

Attorneys for Plaintiff

MAXIM INTEGRATED PRODUCTS, INC.

Case 4:07-cv-04424-PJH Document 52 Filed 04/07/08 Page 3 of 3