Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_19-cv-01063/USCOURTS-caed-2_19-cv-01063-4/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Vonetta LaBelle Benoit
Plaintiff
PNC Bank
Defendant
Quality Loan Service Corp.
Defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

VONETTA LaBELLE BENOIT,

Plaintiff,

v.

PNC BANK; QUALITY LOAN SERVICE 

CORP.,

Defendants.

No. 2:19-cv-1063 MCE DB PS

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Plaintiff Vonetta LaBelle Benoit is proceeding in this action pro se. This matter was 

referred to the undersigned in accordance with Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). 

By order signed February 7, 2020, plaintiff’s amended complaint was dismissed, and plaintiff was 

granted leave to file an amended complaint that cured the defects noted in that order. (ECF No. 

20.) Plaintiff was granted twenty-eight days from the date of that order to file a second amended 

complaint and was specifically cautioned that the failure to respond to the court’s order in a 

timely manner would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. The twenty-eightday period has passed and plaintiff has not responded to the court’s order in any manner.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without 

prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

////

Case 2:19-cv-01063-MCE-DB Document 21 Filed 04/01/20 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

These findings and recommendations will be submitted to the United States District Judge 

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Within thirty (30) days 

after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections 

with the court. A document containing objections should be titled “Objections to Magistrate 

Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within 

the specified time may, under certain circumstances, waive the right to appeal the District Court’s 

order. See Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: April 1, 2020 /s/ DEBORAH BARNES 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

DLB:6

DB/orders/orders.pro se/benoit1063.fta.f&rs

Case 2:19-cv-01063-MCE-DB Document 21 Filed 04/01/20 Page 2 of 2