Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-06423/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-06423-41/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Argyle Capital Management Corp
Defendant
Robert Olins
Defendant
Securities and Exchange Commission
Plaintiff
Spatialight, Inc
Defendant

Document Text:

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE RESCHEDULING

HEARING ON MOTION [Case No.: CV 07-6423 MMC] 1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE 

COMMISSION,

Plaintiff,

v.

ROBERT OLINS, SPATIALIGHT, INC. 

and ARGYLE CAPITAL 

MANAGEMENT CORP., 

Defendants.

Case No.: CV 07-6423 MMC

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

RE RESCHEDULING HEARING ON MOTION

On June 30, 2014, Plaintiff Securities and Exchange Commission filed a Notice of 

Motion, Motion and Brief in Support of Motion for Order to Show Cause Why Defendant Robert 

Olins Should Not Be Held in Contempt of Court. The hearing on the motion is currently 

scheduled for August 8, 2014, at 9:00 a.m.

After receiving the motion via the Court’s Case Management/Electronic Case File

System, on July 3, 2014, counsel for defendant Robert Olins contacted Plaintiff’s counsel. The 

motion was a surprise to defendant Olins as he had been participating in the liquidation of 

Case 3:07-cv-06423-MMC Document 189 Filed 07/07/14 Page 1 of 3
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE RESCHEDULING

HEARING ON MOTION [Case No.: CV 07-6423 MMC] 2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

assets by a receiver through the judgment filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern 

District of New York (1:11-mc-00261-P1). The parties discussed some of the matters 

contained in the Motion, but agreed to allow defense counsel to research the matters 

contained in the Motion and to meet and confer regarding those matters. The parties agreed 

that a short continuance of the hearing on the Motion was in order to allow the parties to have 

meaningful discussions.

On July 3, 2014, defense counsel also contacted the Court’s Courtroom Deputy who 

indicated that the Court was available to hear the motion on the parties’ selected date of 

September 26, 2014, at 1:00 p.m.

Defense counsel, located in the Northern District of California, who will appear at the 

hearing on this Motion is also out of the district between July 26 and August 20, 2014, and 

would be unavailable to appear at the August 8, 2014 hearing date.

As such, to allow for a meaningful meet and confer and due to counsel’s unavailability, 

the parties stipulate and request that the Court vacate the hearing date of August 8, 2014, and 

continue the hearing to September 26, 2014, at 9:00 a.m. The parties further stipulate and 

request that Defendant will file any opposition to the Motion on or before August 26, 2014. 

Plaintiff will file any reply on or before September 3, 2014.

SO STIPULATED:

Dated: July 7, 2014 ______/s/______________________

JOHN S. SILBERMAN

Attorney for Plaintiff

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE 

COMMISSION

Dated: July 7, 2014 _____/s/____________________

EDWIN PRATHER

Attorney for Defendant

ROBERT OLINS

Case 3:07-cv-06423-MMC Document 189 Filed 07/07/14 Page 2 of 3
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE RESCHEDULING

HEARING ON MOTION [Case No.: CV 07-6423 MMC] 3

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

[PROPOSED] ORDER

GOOD CAUSE APPEARING and per the parties’ stipulation, the hearing for 

Plaintiff’s Motion for Order to Show Cause Why Defendant Robert Olins Should Not Be Held in 

Contempt of Court is hereby continued until September 26, 2014, at 9:00 a.m. Defendant will 

file any opposition to the Motion on or before August 26, 2014. Plaintiff will file any reply on or 

before September 3, 2014.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: ____________________ _______________________________

HON. MAXINE M. CHESNEY

U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE

July 7, 2014

Case 3:07-cv-06423-MMC Document 189 Filed 07/07/14 Page 3 of 3