Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-00468/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-00468-2/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
California Correctional Institution
Defendant
Willie Weaver
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

WILLIE WEAVER,

Plaintiff,

v.

CALIFORNIA CORRECTIONAL

INSTITUTION CONFINEMENT

SHU, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

CASE NO. 1:06-CV-00468-OWW-SMS-P

Appeal No. 06-16346

ORDER STRIKING MOTION FOR LEAVE TO

PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS AND FOR

COUNSEL, AND DECLARATION FROM

RECORD 

(Docs. 17 and 18) 

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK’S OFFICE TO

SERVE COPY OF ORDER ON NINTH

CIRCUIT

Plaintiff Willie Weaver (“plaintiff”) is a state prisoner who was proceeding pro se in this civil

rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed this action on April 21, 2006. (Doc. 1.)

Because the complaint in this action sets forth the same claims as those set forth in the complaint

filed on April 17, 2006, in case number 1:06-CV-00442-AWI-SMS-P, the Court dismissed this

action as duplicative of case number 1:06-CV-00442-AWI-SMS-P on June 27, 2006. (Doc. 6.)

Plaintiff filed a notice of appeal on July 10, 2006. (Doc. 8.) On August 3, 2006, plaintiff filed

motions seeking leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal, transcripts at government expense,

and the appointment of counsel. (Docs. 10-13.) On August 18, 2006, the Court issued orders

denying plaintiff’s motions. (Docs. 15, 16.) On August 21, 2006, plaintiff filed another motion for

leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal and for the appointment of counsel. (Docs. 17, 18.)

///

Case 1:06-cv-00468-OWW -SMS Document 19 Filed 09/26/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Plaintiff’s current motion was dated August 14, 2006. Therefore, it appears the motion was drafted

and mailed prior to plaintiff’s receipt of the Court’s August 18 orders. 

Because plaintiff’s current motion is duplicative of his earlier motions, which have been

resolved by the Court, the August 21 motion is HEREBY STRICKEN FROM THE RECORD. The

Clerk’s Office is DIRECTED to send a courtesy copy of this order to the Ninth Circuit.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 22, 2006 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger 

emm0d6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-00468-OWW -SMS Document 19 Filed 09/26/06 Page 2 of 2