Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-09-02055/USCOURTS-ca4-09-02055-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
CCBCC, Inc.
Appellee
Katrina Lynn Caudill
Appellant

Document Text:

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-2055

KATRINA LYNN CAUDILL,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

CCBCC, INC., a corporation,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern 

District of West Virginia, at Charleston. John T. Copenhaver, 

Jr., District Judge. (2:08-cv-01202)

Submitted: June 4, 2010 Decided: June 29, 2010

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William Douglas Witten, Donald C. Wandling, AVIS, WITTEN & 

WANDLING, L.C., Logan, West Virginia, for Appellant. Eric W. 

Iskra, Alyesha P. Asghar, SPILMAN THOMAS & BATTLE, PLLC, 

Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 09-2055 Doc: 27 Filed: 06/29/2010 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Katrina Lynn Caudill appeals the district court’s 

order granting summary judgment in favor of her former employer 

in this employment discrimination action. We have reviewed the 

record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for 

the reasons stated by the district court. Caudill v. CCBCC, 

Inc., 651 F. Supp. 2d 499 (S.D. W. Va. 2009); see also Wahi v. 

Charleston Area Med. Ctr., Inc., 562 F.3d 599, 617 (4th Cir. 

2009) (“[A] plaintiff may not raise new claims after discovery 

has begun without amending [her] complaint.”) (collecting cases 

from other circuits adopting rule), cert. denied, 130 S. Ct. 

1140 (2010); Swears v. R.M. Roach & Sons, __ S.E.2d __, 2010 WL 

1839408 (W. Va. 2010) (setting forth elements of wrongful 

discharge claim based upon violation of substantial public 

policy). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

AFFIRMED

Appeal: 09-2055 Doc: 27 Filed: 06/29/2010 Pg: 2 of 2