Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-01358/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-01358-2/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Tom L. Carey
Respondent
Koua Vang
Petitioner

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KOUA VANG, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

)

v. )

)

)

TOM L. CAREY, )

)

Respondent. )

 )

1:05-cv-01358-LJO-TAG HC 

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATION

(Doc. 9)

ORDER DISMISSING PETITION FOR WRIT

OF HABEAS CORPUS

(Doc. 1)

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO

ENTER JUDGMENT

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. 

On August 6, 2007, the Magistrate Judge assigned to the case filed a Findings and

Recommendation recommending that the petition for writ of habeas corpus be DISMISSED because

the Petition was not filed within the one-year time period provided for in 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(1). 

(Doc. 9). The Findings and Recommendation was served on all parties and contained notice that any

objections were to be filed within thirty days from the date of service of that order. To date, the

parties have not filed timely objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a de

novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court concludes that the

Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation is supported by the record and proper analysis. 

Petitioner's objections present no grounds for questioning the Magistrate Judge's analysis. 

Case 1:05-cv-01358-LJO-TAG Document 10 Filed 09/21/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendation issued August 6, 2007 (Doc. 9), is ADOPTED IN

FULL; 

2. The petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. 1) is DISMISSED; and

3. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to ENTER JUDGMENT for Respondent and close the

file.

This order terminates the action in its entirety.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 21, 2007 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill 

b9ed48 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:05-cv-01358-LJO-TAG Document 10 Filed 09/21/07 Page 2 of 2