Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-01129/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-01129-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Eduardo Aguirre
Defendant
Michael Chertoff
Defendant
Department of Justice
Defendant
Alberto Gonzales
Defendant
Howard Hamilton
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

 The petitioner also served the other parties on the following dates: Michael Chertoff,

October 6, 2005; Alberto Gonzales, October 4, 2005; and Eduardo Aguirre, October 3, 2005.

1

McGREGOR W. SCOTT

United States Attorney

MARIANNE A. PANSA

Assistant United States Attorney

Federal Building, Room 3654

1130 O Street

Fresno, California 93721

Telephone: (559) 498-7272

Attorneys for Defendants

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Howard Hamilton, ) CIV-F-05-CV-01129-OWW-DLB

)

Petitioner. ) STIPULATION and ORDER

) RESPONDENTS’ ANSWER

v. ) AND 

)

)

Department of Justice, et al., )

)

)

Defendants. )

__________________________________________)

On October 12, 2005, the petitioner, Howard Hamilton, pro se, served a Complaint on

the United States Attorney’s Office, requesting that the court adjudicate his naturalization

application.1 The respondents Answer to the Complaint is due on December 12, 2005. The

parties hereby stipulate that the respondents’ Answer can be filed by January 23 2006. Good

cause exits for this stipulation because the respondents are working to adjudicate the petitioner’s

application for citizenship and the matter may be resolved if given the extra time. If the issue is

not resolved, the parties stipulate that the respondents can file an Answer on the date above. In

Case 1:05-cv-01129-OWW -DLB Document 15 Filed 12/16/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

light of the above, the parties also request and that the Joint Scheduling Conference Report which

is currently due on January 4, 2006, be filed on February 2, 2006, and the Scheduling

Conference currently scheduled for January 11, 200, at 8:45 am be rescheduled to February

10, 2006, at 8 :45 am.

Dated: December 12, 2005 Respectfully Submitted,

McGREGOR W. SCOTT

United States Attorney

By: /s/ Marianne A. Pansa

Marianne A. Pansa

Assistant U.S. Attorney

Attorneys for the Defendants

By: /s/ Howard Hamilton (consent given to sign)

Howard Hamilton

Pro se

Pursuant to this Joint Stipulation and for the reasons stated therein, IT IS HEREBY

ORDERED that the respondents’ Answer is due on January 23, 2006. The Joint Scheduling

Conference Report is due on February 2, 2006, and the Scheduling Conference will be held on

February 10, 2006 at 8:45 am. 

/s/ OLIVER W. WANGER

Date : __December 14, 2005___ __________________________________

Oliver W. Wanger

United States District Court Judge

Case 1:05-cv-01129-OWW -DLB Document 15 Filed 12/16/05 Page 2 of 2