Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca5-23-11139/USCOURTS-ca5-23-11139-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Rodrik Douglas
Appellant
United States of America
Appellee

Document Text:

United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit ____________

No. 23-11139

Summary Calendar

____________

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Rodrik Douglas, 

Defendant—Appellant.

______________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:23-CR-19-1

______________________________

Before Haynes, Higginson, and Douglas, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

The attorney appointed to represent Rodrik Douglas has moved for 

leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 

386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). 

Douglas has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the 

relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s 

_____________________

* This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

December 17, 2024

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 23-11139 Document: 69-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/17/2024
No. 23-11139

2

assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate 

review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is 

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and 

the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

Case: 23-11139 Document: 69-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/17/2024