Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-04471/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-04471-4/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Linda Centore
Defendant
Dorothy Perry
Defendant
Regents of the University of California
Defendant
Kulginder Sran
Plaintiff

Document Text:

STIPULATION FOR AN ORDER GRANTING EXTENSIONS OF TIME FOR THE 

FILING OF AN OPPOSITION AND REPLY TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS 

 AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

(CASE NO. 3:15-cv-04471-JST) 1 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Jay T. Jambeck (SBN 226018) 

jjambeck@leighlawgroup.com 

Mandy G. Leigh (SBN 225748) 

LEIGH LAW GROUP, P.C. 

870 Market Street, Suite 1157 

San Francisco, CA 94102 

Telephone: 415-399-9155 

Facsimile: 415-795-3733 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

KULGINDER SRAN 

MICHAEL D. BRUNO (SBN 166805) 

mbruno@gordonrees.com

ALYSON S. CABRERA (SBN 222717) 

acabrera@gordonrees.com JENNIFER M. LYNCH (SBN 272976) 

jlynch@gordonrees.com 

GORDON & REES 

SCULLY MANSUKHANI LLP 

275 Battery Street, Suite 2000 

San Francisco, CA 94111 

Telephone: (415) 986-5900 

Facsimile: (415) 986-8054 

Attorneys for Defendant 

THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

KULGINDER SRAN, 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF 

CALIFORNIA, Dr. LINDA CENTORE, an 

individual, Dr. DOROTHY PERRY, an 

individual, 

Defendants. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

)

) 

) 

) 

) 

)

CASE NO. 3:15-cv-04471-JST 

STIPULATION FOR AN ORDER 

GRANTING EXTENSIONS OF TIME 

FOR THE FILING OF AN 

OPPOSITION AND REPLY TO 

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO 

DISMISS 

Case 3:15-cv-04471-JST Document 26 Filed 04/06/16 Page 1 of 3
STIPULATION FOR AN ORDER GRANTING EXTENSIONS OF TIME FOR THE 

FILING OF AN OPPOSITION AND REPLY TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS 

 AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

(CASE NO. 3:15-cv-04471-JST) 2 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

THE PARTIES TO THIS MATTER, by and through their respective attorneys of record 

herein, do hereby stipulate and agree that Plaintiff shall have a seven-day extension to file an 

opposition to Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss certain portions of the First Amended Complaint 

[D.E. 23]. If approved by the Court, Plaintiff’s opposition which is currently due April 14, 2016 

will be due April 21, 2016. 

The parties further agree that Defendants shall have a seven-day extension in which to file 

their reply. If approved by the Court, Defendants’ reply which is currently due April 28, 2016 

will be due May 5, 2016. 

 Plaintiff’s extension is necessitated due to the fact that Plaintiff’s counsel has a previously 

scheduled vacation from April 7-14, 2016. Defendants have therefore requested a commensurate 

extension. 

 The hearing on Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss is set for June 9, 2016 at 2:00 p.m. 

DATED: APRIL 6, 2016 

LEIGH LAW GROUP, P.C. 

/s/ Jay T. Jambeck 

_________________________________ 

Jay T. Jambeck 

Attorney for Plaintiff 

I, Jay T. Jambeck, hereby attest that I have on file all holograph signatures for any 

signatures indicated by a "conformed" signature (/S/) within this efiled document. 

DATED: APRIL 6, 2016 GORDON & REES SCULLY 

MANSUKHANI LLP 

 /s/ Jennifer M. Lynch 

 _________________________________ 

 

Case 3:15-cv-04471-JST Document 26 Filed 04/06/16 Page 2 of 3
STIPULATION FOR AN ORDER GRANTING EXTENSIONS OF TIME FOR THE 

FILING OF AN OPPOSITION AND REPLY TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS 

 AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

(CASE NO. 3:15-cv-04471-JST) 3 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

The parties have submitted a Stipulation for an Order Granting Extensions of Time for the 

Filing of an Opposition and Reply to the Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (“Stipulation”). Based 

on the Stipulation of the parties, and for good cause shown, Plaintiff is granted an extension until 

on or before April 21, 2016 to file an opposition to the Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss. 

Defendants are granted a commensurate extension until on or before May 5, 2016 for the filing of 

a reply in support of their Motion to Dismiss. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: April 6, 2016 

HON. JON S. TIGAR 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

APPROVED

 Judge Jon S. Tigar 

Case 3:15-cv-04471-JST Document 26 Filed 04/06/16 Page 3 of 3