Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_15-cv-01591/USCOURTS-caed-1_15-cv-01591-2/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
D. Davey
Defendant
Tony Tran
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TONY TRAN,

Plaintiff,

v.

D. DAVEY,

Defendant.

Case No. 1:15-cv-01591-LJO-BAM (PC)

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS 

ACTION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED 

FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM, 

FAILURE TO OBEY A COURT ORDER, 

AND FAILURE TO PROSECUTE

(ECF No. 9)

TWENTY (20) DAY DEADLINE

Plaintiff Tony Tran (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma 

pauperis in this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff initiated this action on 

October 19, 2015. (ECF No. 1.)

On December 2, 2016, the Court issued a screening order dismissing Plaintiff’s first 

amended complaint with leave to amend within thirty (30) days. (ECF No. 9.) The Court 

expressly warned Plaintiff that the failure to file an amended complaint in compliance with the 

Court’s order would result in this action being dismissed, with prejudice, for failure to state a 

claim and failure to obey a court order. (Id., p. 6.) The deadline for Plaintiff to file an amended 

complaint has expired, and he has not complied with or otherwise responded to the Court’s order.

Accordingly, the Court HEREBY ORDERS that Plaintiff shall show cause in writing, 

within twenty (20) days of service of this order, why this action should not be dismissed for 

Case 1:15-cv-01591-LJO-BAM Document 10 Filed 01/11/17 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Plaintiff’s failure to comply with the Court’s December 2, 2016 order, for failure to state a claim, 

and for failure to prosecute. Plaintiff can comply with this order to show cause by filing an 

amended complaint. The failure to respond to this order will result in the dismissal of this 

action, with prejudice, for failure to state a claim, failure to obey a court order, and failure 

to prosecute.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 11, 2017 /s/ Barbara A. McAuliffe _

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:15-cv-01591-LJO-BAM Document 10 Filed 01/11/17 Page 2 of 2