Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-10-06271/USCOURTS-ca4-10-06271-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Bruce Lee Johnson
Appellant
United States of America
Appellee

Document Text:

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-6271

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

BRUCE LEE JOHNSON,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Florence. C. Weston Houck, Senior District 

Judge. (4:02-cr-00579-CWH-2)

Submitted: July 20, 2010 Decided: August 11, 2010

Before NIEMEYER and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, 

Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Bruce Lee Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. William E. Day, II, Rose 

Mary Sheppard Parham, Assistant United States Attorneys, 

Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 10-6271 Doc: 7 Filed: 08/11/2010 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Bruce Lee Johnson appeals the district court’s order 

granting his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006) motion. We have 

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. See Dillon v. 

United States, 2010 WL 2400109 (U.S. June 17, 2010) (No. 

09-6338); United States v. Dunphy, 531 F.3d 247, 250-52 (4th 

Cir. 2009). Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by 

the district court. United States v. Johnson, No. 4:02-cr00579-CWH-2 (D.S.C. Feb. 1, 2010). We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before the court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Appeal: 10-6271 Doc: 7 Filed: 08/11/2010 Pg: 2 of 2