Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-05108/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-05108-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Felix Manuel Bermudez
Petitioner
Joe McGrath
Respondent

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

U.S. District Court

 E. D. California cd 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

FELIX MANUEL BERMUDEZ, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

)

v. )

)

)

JOE McGRATH, )

)

Respondent. )

 )

1:04-CV-05108 OWW SMS HC

ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME

[Doc. #17]

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATION

[Doc. #16]

ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT

OF HABEAS CORPUS

[Doc. #1]

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT

TO ENTER JUDGMENT

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. 

On October 11, 2006, the Magistrate Judge issued Findings and Recommendation that

recommended the petition be DENIED. The Magistrate Judge further recommended that the Clerk of

Court be DIRECTED to enter judgment. The Findings and Recommendation was served on all

parties and contained notice that any objections were to be filed within ten (10) days of the date of

service of the order. 

On October 27, 2006, Petitioner filed a motion for an extension of time to file objections.

Case 1:04-cv-05108-OWW -SMS Document 19 Filed 12/04/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

U.S. District Court

 E. D. California cd 2

Petitioner filed his objections on November 13, 2006.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a de

novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file and having considered the

objections, the Court concludes that the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation is

supported by the record and proper analysis, and there is no need to modify the Findings and

Recommendations based on the points raised in the objections. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Petitioner motion for extension of time is GRANTED nunc pro tunc to November 13,

2006;

2. The Findings and Recommendation issued October 11, 2006, is ADOPTED IN FULL; 

3. The petition for writ of habeas corpus is DENIED; and

4. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to enter judgment.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: December 3, 2006 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger 

emm0d6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:04-cv-05108-OWW -SMS Document 19 Filed 12/04/06 Page 2 of 2