Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-15-02598/USCOURTS-ca4-15-02598-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Scott Bliemeister
Appellee
Jerome Burgess
Appellee
Shane Fortune
Appellee
King Grant-Davis
Appellant
Greg Ley
Appellee
Wal-Mart
Appellee

Document Text:

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-2598

KING GRANT-DAVIS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

SHANE FORTUNE; SCOTT BLIEMEISTER; JEROME BURGESS; GREG LEY, 

of Wal-Mart, Charleston, South Carolina District; WAL-MART,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Charleston. Patrick Michael Duffy, Senior

District Judge. (2:15-cv-04211-PMD)

Submitted: April 19, 2016 Decided: April 21, 2016

Before AGEE, DIAZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

King Grant-Davis, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 15-2598 Doc: 5 Filed: 04/21/2016 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

King Grant-Davis appeals the district court’s order 

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying 

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have 

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, 

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. GrantDavis v. Fortune, No. 2:15-cv-04211-PMD (D.S.C. Dec. 8, 2015). 

We decline to consider the arguments Grant-Davis raises for the 

first time on appeal. Muth v. United States, 1 F.3d 246, 250 

(4th Cir. 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the 

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Appeal: 15-2598 Doc: 5 Filed: 04/21/2016 Pg: 2 of 2