Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-08-06371/USCOURTS-ca4-08-06371-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Albert Curtis Mills
Appellant
Warden
Appellee

Document Text:

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-6371

ALBERT CURTIS MILLS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

WARDEN,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge.

(8:07-cv-03466-DKC)

Submitted: August 14, 2008 Decided: August 19, 2008

Before MICHAEL, Circuit Judge, and WILKINS and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Albert Curtis Mills, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 08-6371 Doc: 9 Filed: 08/19/2008 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Albert Curtis Mills seeks to appeal the district court’s

order placing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint on the

unassigned docket in accordance with Mills’ pre-filing injunction.

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that the

district court did not err. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons

stated by the district court. See Mills v. Warden, No.

8:07-cv-03466-DKC (D. Md. Jan. 8, 2008). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Appeal: 08-6371 Doc: 9 Filed: 08/19/2008 Pg: 2 of 2