Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-03295/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-03295-10/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Chase Manhattan Mortgage Corporation
Defendant
Nancy Lendall
Plaintiff

Document Text:

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

NANCY LENDALL, an individual,

Plaintiff,

 v.

CHASE MANHATTAN MORTGAGE

CORPORATION, a New Jersey corporation,

and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive,

Defendants. /

No. C 05-03295 WHA

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

WHY DISCOVERY MOTION

SHOULD NOT BE STRICKEN

Plaintiff is hereby ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why the motion to compel response to

deposition questions filed on September 14, 2006, should not be stricken in light of the failure

to comply with Local Rule 26-2 which requires that all motions to compel discovery be made

within seven calendar days after the fact discovery cut-off. The response to this order shall be

filed by SEPTEMBER 21 AT NOON. The additional motion to preclude defendant’s introduction

of expert testimony will be heard on OCTOBER 19 as noticed. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 18, 2006. WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:05-cv-03295-WHA Document 54 Filed 09/18/06 Page 1 of 1