Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-15-01289/USCOURTS-ca4-15-01289-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Jose Nacacio Amu
Petitioner

Document Text:

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-1289

In Re: JOSE NACACIO AMU, a/k/a Amu, a/k/a Sld Dft 3:97-40-11,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. 

(3:97-cr-00040-FDW-11)

Submitted: April 7, 2015 Decided: May 14, 2015

Before NIEMEYER and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jose Nacacio Amu, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 15-1289 Doc: 6 Filed: 05/14/2015 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Jose Nacacio Amu petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging 

the district court has unduly delayed acting on his motion for a 

sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012). He 

seeks an order from this court directing the district court to 

act. Our review of the district court’s docket reveals that the 

district court recently denied Amu’s motion for a sentence 

reduction based on Amendment 782, and the court previously 

denied him a sentence reduction based on Amendment 750.

Accordingly, because the district court has recently decided

Amu’s case, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We dispense 

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process. 

PETITION DENIED

Appeal: 15-1289 Doc: 6 Filed: 05/14/2015 Pg: 2 of 2