Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_16-cv-00178/USCOURTS-caed-1_16-cv-00178-2/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Eli Lilly and Company
Plaintiff
Felicia Gitmed
Defendant
Holly Gitmed
Defendant
John Derek Gitmed
Defendant
Anthony Pollino Jr.
Defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ELI LILLY AND COMPANY, an Indiana 

corporation,

Plaintiff,

v.

JOHN DEREK GITMED, an individual; 

HOLLY GITMED, an individual; 

FELICIA GITMED, an individual; 

ANTHONY POLLINO JR., an individual; 

and DOES 1-50, inclusive,

Defendants.

No. 1:16-cv-00178-DAD-SAB

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF THE 

COURT TO TERMINATE DEFENDANT 

HOLLY GITMED FROM THIS ACTION

(Doc. No. 20)

On May 11, 2016, plaintiff Eli Lilly and Company and defendant Holly Gitmed filed a 

joint stipulation dismissing defendant Holly Gitmed from this action without prejudice, with each 

party to bear its own costs and attorneys’ fees. (Doc. No. 20.) In light of the parties’ stipulation, 

Holly Gitmed has been dismissed from this action without prejudice and without an award of 

attorneys’ fees and costs to either party. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii); Wilson v. City of San 

Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997). 

/////

/////

/////

Case 1:16-cv-00178-DAD-SAB Document 22 Filed 05/13/16 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is directed to terminate defendant Holly Gitmed from 

this action. This dismissal does not affect the status of the other defendants in the action.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 12, 2016 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:16-cv-00178-DAD-SAB Document 22 Filed 05/13/16 Page 2 of 2