Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_07-cv-02687/USCOURTS-cand-4_07-cv-02687-6/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Cardica, Inc.
Plaintiff
Integrated Vascular Interventional Technologies, L.C.
Defendant

Document Text:

1 

 2 

 3 

 4 

 5 

 6 

 7 

 8 

 9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

Case No. 07-2687 SBA 

BRENT P. LORIMER (USB No. A3731) (admitted pro hac vice) 

blorimer@wnlaw.com 

THOMAS R. VUKSINICK (USB No. A3341) (admitted pro hac vice) 

tvuksinick@wnlaw.com 

CHAD E. NYDEGGER (USB No. 9664) (to be admitted pro hac vice) 

cnydegger@wnlaw.com 

WORKMAN NYDEGGER 

1000 Eagle Gate Tower 

60 East South Temple 

Salt Lake City, UT 84111 

Telephone: (801) 533-9800 

Facsimile: (801) 328-1707 

ROBERT H. SLOSS 

FARELLA BRAUN & MARTEL LLP 

235 Montgomery Street 

San Francisco, CA 94101 

Telephone: (415) 954-4400 

Facsimile: (415) 954-4480 (fax) 

RSloss@fbm.com 

Attorneys for Defendant 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

CARDICA, INC., a Delaware corporation, 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

INTEGRATED VASCULAR 

INTERVENTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES, 

L.C., a Utah limited liability company, 

 Defendant. 

Case No. 07-2687 SBA 

Honorable Saundra Brown Armstrong 

STIPULATION AND ORDER 

EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO 

COMPLAINT 

Case 4:07-cv-02687-SBA Document 47 Filed 04/02/08 Page 1 of 3
 1 

 2 

 3 

 4 

 5 

 6 

 7 

 8 

 9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

Case No. 07-2687 SBA 2

The parties having met and conferred, through their counsel, stipulate to extend Defendant 

Integrated Vascular Interventional Technologies, L.C.’s time to respond to the complaint from April 

2, 2008 to April 16, 2008. This is the first extension requested by Defendant to respond to the 

complaint. This extension will not unduly delay the progress of this action. Defendant’s response to 

the Complaint will be due one week before the case management conference currently scheduled by 

the Court. Therefore, good cause exists for granting the stipulated extension. 

 Respectfully Submitted, 

 SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP 

Dated: March 28, 2008 By /s/ Jeffrey M. Olson 

Jeffrey M. Olson 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

CARDICA, INC. 

 WORKMAN NYDEGGER 

Dated: March 28, 2008 By: /s/ Thomas R. Vuksinick 

Brent P. Lorimer 

Thomas R. Vuksinick 

Attorneys for Defendant 

 ORDER 

IT IS SO ORDERED: 

 Dated: 4/2/08 

Saundra B. Armstrong 

United States District Judge 

Case 4:07-cv-02687-SBA Document 47 Filed 04/02/08 Page 2 of 3
 1 

 2 

 3 

 4 

 5 

 6 

 7 

 8 

 9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

Case No. 07-2687 SBA 3

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that on March 28, 2008, I electronically filed the foregoing with the Clerk of 

the Court using the CM/ECF system which sent notification of such filing to the following: 

jolson@sidley.com and stiu@sidley.com; and I hereby certify that I have mailed by United States 

Postal Service the document to the following non-CM/ECF participant: 

Paul Howard Meier 

Sidley Austin LLP 

555 West Fifth Street, Suite 4000 

Los Angeles, CA 90013 

Executed on March 28, 2008, at Salt Lake City, Utah. 

 WORKMAN NYDEGGER 

 By /s/ Thomas R. Vuksinick 

BRENT P. LORIMER 

 THOMAS R. VUKSINICK 

 CHAD E. NYDEGGER 

 Attorneys for Defendant 

J:\168901\016 Cardica - revised draft stipulated extension.DOC 

Case 4:07-cv-02687-SBA Document 47 Filed 04/02/08 Page 3 of 3