Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca10-89-06299/USCOURTS-ca10-89-06299-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Clifford Eugene Campbell
Appellant
Tay Dang
Appellee
Bill Garner
Appellee

Document Text:

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

TENTH CIRCUIT 

CLIFFORD EUGENE CAMPBELL, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

) 

) 

) 

l1 lLED 

United States Co~rt ~f Appeals 

Tenth Cm:mt 

APR 2 5 1990 

R.OBERT L. HOECKER 

Clerk 

) No. 89-6299 

v. 

BILL GARNER, DR. TAY DANG, 

Defendants-Appellees. 

) (D.C. No. CIV-88-1613-W) 

) (W. Dist. Okla.) 

) 

) 

) 

ORDER AND JUDGMENT* 

Before LOGAN, SEYMOUR, and BALDOCK, Circuit Judges. 

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel 

has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially 

assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 

34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The cause is therefore ordered 

submitted without oral argument. 

Plaintiff Clifford Eugene Campbell filed a civil rights 

complaint alleging that the state institution where he is confined 

has violated the Fourteenth Amendment by denying him adequate and 

equal medical treatment, and the Eighth Amendment by its 

*This order and judgment has no precedential value and shall not 

be cited, or used by any court within the Tenth Circuit, except 

for purposes of establishing the doctrines of the law of the case, 

res judicata, or collateral estoppel. 10th Cir. R. 36.3. 

Appellate Case: 89-6299 Document: 01019972101 Date Filed: 04/25/1990 Page: 1 
deliberate indifference to his medical needs. Campbell, a 

quadriplegic who can use only his right hand, specifically 

complains that his wheelchair is inadequate and unsafe and that 

defendants have failed to provide physical therapy for him. 

The district court ordered defendants to prepare a Martinez 

report, see Martinez v. Chavez, 574 F.2d 317 (10th Cir. 1978). 

Thereafter, Campbell responded with an affidavit and a brief. 

In a thorough opinion, the distri ct court reviewed the 

medical care Campbell has received in the institution and 

concluded as a matter of law that Campbell's medical needs have 

not been ignored. We have reviewed the entire record and we agree 

with the district court's analysis and conclusion. We affirm the 

district court's dismissal of Campbell's action substantially for 

the reasons given in the district court's Memorandum Opinion filed 

July 31, 1989. The mandate shall iss ue forthwith. 

-2-

Entered for the Court 

Stephanie K. Seymour 

Circuit Judge 

Appellate Case: 89-6299 Document: 01019972101 Date Filed: 04/25/1990 Page: 2