Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_15-cv-05315/USCOURTS-cand-4_15-cv-05315-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Deeann Huss
Plaintiff
Life Insurance Company of North America
Defendant

Document Text:

LA #4852-0792-4269 v1 

American LegalNet, Inc. 

www.FormsWorkFlow.com

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DEEANN HUSS, CASE NO. 15-cv-05315-JSW 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS

Plaintiff(s),

v.

LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF 

NORTH AMERICA,

Defendant(s).

Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the 

following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5:

The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process:

Court Processes:

 Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4) 

 Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5) 

 Mediation (ADR L.R. 6)

(Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is 

appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any other form of ADR must participate in an 

ADR phone conference and may not file this form. They must instead file a Notice of Need for 

ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5)

Private Process:

 Private ADR (please identify process and provider) The parties are conferring, 

and will select a mutually agreed upon mediator and date within the next 30 days. 

The parties agree to hold the ADR session by: 

 the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the order

referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered. )

 other requested deadline 120 days from date of ADR order. 

Dated: February 2, 2016 s/ Michael Quirk 

Attorney for Plaintiff, Deeann Huss 

Dated: February 2, 2016 s/ Kristin P. Kyle de Bautista 

Attorney for Defendant, Life 

Insurance Company of North 

America

CONTINUE TO FOLLOWING PAGE

Case 4:15-cv-05315-JSW Document 19 Filed 02/02/16 Page 1 of 2
Rev. 12/11 

Page 2 of 2 

LA #4852-0792-4269 v1

American LegalNet, Inc. 

www.FormsWorkFlow.com

[PROPOSED] ORDER

 The parties’ stipulation is adopted and IT IS SO ORDERED. 

 The parties’ stipulation is modified as follows, and IT IS SO ORDERED. 

 

Dated: 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

HON. JEFFREY S. WHITE

When filing this document in ECF, please be sure to use the appropriate Docket 

Event, e.g., “Stipulation and Proposed Order Selecting Mediation.”

X

February 2, 2016

Case 4:15-cv-05315-JSW Document 19 Filed 02/02/16 Page 2 of 2