Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_18-cv-03063/USCOURTS-caed-2_18-cv-03063-3/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Anthony Ferrantino
Plaintiff
Sacramento County Office of Education
Defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ANTHONY FERRANTINO,

Plaintiff,

v.

SACRAMENTO COUNTY OFFICE OF 

EDUCATION,

Defendant.

No. 2:18-cv-3063 JAM DB PS

ORDER

Plaintiff Anthony Ferrantino is proceeding in this action pro se. This matter was, 

therefore, referred to the undersigned in accordance with Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 

636(b)(1). Defendant has filed an answer. 

Good cause appearing, IT IS ORDERED that:

1. A Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference is set for Friday, June 26, 2020, at 10:00 

a.m. at the United States District Court, 501 I Street, Sacramento, California, in Courtroom No. 

27 before the undersigned.

2. All parties are required to appear at the Status Conference, either by counsel or, if 

proceeding in propria persona, on his or her own behalf. Any party may appear at the status 

conference telephonically if the party pre-arranges such appearance by contacting Pete Buzo, the 

courtroom deputy of the undersigned magistrate judge, at (916) 930-4128, no later than 48 hours 

Case 2:18-cv-03063-DB Document 36 Filed 04/24/20 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

before the Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference; a party may not appear telephonically over a 

cellphone.

3. Plaintiff shall file and serve a status report on or before June 12, 2020, and defendant

shall file and serve a status report on or before June 19, 2020. Each party’s status report shall 

address all of the following matters:

a. Progress of service of process;

b. Possible joinder of additional parties;

c. Possible amendment of the pleadings;

d. Jurisdiction and venue;

e. Anticipated motions and the scheduling thereof;

f. Anticipated discovery and the scheduling thereof, including 

disclosure of expert witnesses;

g. Future proceedings, including the setting of appropriate cut-off 

dates for discovery and for law and motion, and the scheduling of a 

final pretrial conference and trial;

h. Modification of standard pretrial procedures specified by the rules 

due to the relative simplicity or complexity of the action;

i. Whether the case is related to any other case, including matters in 

bankruptcy;

j. Whether the parties will stipulate to the magistrate judge assigned 

to this matter acting as settlement judge, waiving any 

disqualification by virtue of her so acting, or whether they prefer to 

have a Settlement Conference before another magistrate judge;

k. Whether the parties intend to consent to proceed before a United 

States Magistrate Judge; and

l. Any other matters that may aid in the just and expeditious 

disposition of this action.

4. The parties are cautioned that failure to file a status report or failure to appear at the 

status conference may result in an order imposing an appropriate sanction. See Local Rules 110 

and 183.

DATED: April 24, 2020 /s/ DEBORAH BARNES 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:18-cv-03063-DB Document 36 Filed 04/24/20 Page 2 of 2