Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-20-01053/USCOURTS-ca4-20-01053-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Girl Scouts Council of Colonial Coast
Appellee
Repaunzel Jackson
Appellant
Tracy Keller
Appellee

Document Text:

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20-1053

REPAUNZEL JACKSON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

GIRL SCOUTS COUNCIL OF COLONIAL COAST; TRACY KELLER,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at 

Newport News. Mark S. Davis, Chief District Judge. (4:18-cv-00129-MSD-RJK)

Submitted: May 21, 2020 Decided: May 27, 2020

Before AGEE and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit 

Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Repaunzel Jackson, Appellant Pro Se. Milena Radovic, Kristina H. Vaquera, JACKSON 

LEWIS PC, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 20-1053 Doc: 13 Filed: 05/27/2020 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Repaunzel Jackson appeals the district court’s order granting Defendants’ motion 

to dismiss her discrimination and retaliation claims, brought pursuant to Title VII of the 

Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (2018), and the Age 

Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, 29 U.S.C. §§ 621 to 634 (2018), and declining 

to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Jackson’s state law breach of contract claims. 

We have reviewed the record in conjunction with the arguments Jackson raises in her 

informal brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b); see also Jackson v. Lightsey, 775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th 

Cir. 2014) (“The informal brief is an important document; under Fourth Circuit rules, our 

review is limited to issues preserved in that brief.”). Finding no reversible error, we affirm 

the district court’s judgment. See Jackson v. Girl Scouts Council, No. 4:18-cv-00129-

MSD-RJK (E.D. Va. Dec. 20, 2019). We dispense with oral argument because the facts 

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

USCA4 Appeal: 20-1053 Doc: 13 Filed: 05/27/2020 Pg: 2 of 2