Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_03-cv-05819/USCOURTS-caed-1_03-cv-05819-19/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Mike Knowles
Respondent
Tommy Ray Williams
Petitioner

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

This matter is before the Court after it was remanded by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeal “for 

a determination of whether [Petitioner’s] actual innocence claim meets the standard set forth in 

McQuiggin so that he is entitled to an exception to the expiration of the AEDPA statute of 

limitations.” (Doc. 89, pp. 2-3). 

Within 10 days, the parties are ORDERED to file a brief, not to exceed five pages, indicating 

whether an evidentiary hearing is appropriate related to the issue of whether the hospital’s in placing 

the feeding tube into the victim constituted gross negligence. If either party requests such a hearing, 

he SHALL set forth what the evidence he intends to present will show and the earliest possible 

timeframe he would be ready for that hearing.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 19, 2015 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

TOMMY RAY WILLIAMS,

 Petitioner,

v.

MIKE KNOWLES, Warden,

Respondent.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: 1:03-cv-05819-JLT

ORDER REQUIRING THE PARTIES TO FILE A 

SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF

10-DAY DEADLINE

Case 1:03-cv-05819-JLT Document 96 Filed 02/19/15 Page 1 of 1