Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_13-cv-01632/USCOURTS-caed-2_13-cv-01632-3/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Robert Benyamini
Plaintiff
T. Minton
Defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ROBERT BENYAMINI,

Plaintiff,

v.

T. MINTON,

Defendant.

No. 2:13-cv-01632 JAM DAD P

ORDER

Plaintiff is a former state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 

42 U.S.C. § 1983. On March 27, 2015, the court screened plaintiff’s first amended complaint and 

determined that service was appropriate on defendant T. Minton. (ECF No. 12.) Accordingly, 

plaintiff was directed to return, within thirty days, the documents necessary to effect service on 

these defendants. (Id.) On April 6, 2015, the court received the necessary documents from 

plaintiff. (ECF No. 13.) On April 21, 2015, the court issued an order directing the United States 

Marshal to serve defendant Minton. (ECF No. 14.)

Now pending before the court is plaintiff’s motion, filed on May 7, 2015, for a thirty-day 

extension of time to submit the documents necessary to effect service on defendant Minton. 

(ECF No. 16.) The court is puzzled by plaintiff’s filing since he previously submitted to the court

the documents required to effect service.

/////

Case 2:13-cv-01632-JAM-AC Document 17 Filed 05/19/15 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Because plaintiff has already submitted the documents to the court that he is now seeking 

an extension of time to submit, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion for a thirty-day 

extension of time (ECF No. 16) is denied as having been rendered moot.

Dated: May 19, 2015

DAD:10

beny1632.eot.deny

Case 2:13-cv-01632-JAM-AC Document 17 Filed 05/19/15 Page 2 of 2