Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-01122/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-01122-2/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
City of Nevada City
Defendant
Susan Colbert
Plaintiff
Bob Micander
Defendant
Paul Rohde
Defendant
Lou Trovato
Defendant

Document Text:

STIPULATION RE: DISMISSAL OF PORTIONS OF COMPLAINT WITH PREJUDICE; ORDER 

1 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

CATHARINE A. CHING, (SBN 139963) 

ELIE & ASSOCIATES 

11070 White Rock Road, Suite 200 

Rancho Cordova, CA 95670 

T: (916) 638-6610 

F: (916) 638-6607 

Attorneys for Defendants 

CITY OF NEVADA CITY, LOU 

TRAVATO, BOB MICANDER and PAUL 

ROHDE 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SUSAN COLBERT, 

 Plaintiff, 

vs. 

CITY OF NEVADA, a municipality, LOU 

TROVATO, in his capacity as Chief of Police 

for the CITY OF NEVADA, BOB MICANDER, 

individually and in his capacity as a police 

officer for the CITY OF NEVADA, PAUL 

ROHDE, individually and in his capacity as a 

police officer for the CITY OF NEVADA CITY, 

and DOES 1-100, inclusive, 

 Defendants. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Case No. 2:06-CV-01122-MCE-DAD 

STIPULATION RE: DISMISSAL OF 

PORTIONS OF COMPLAINT WITH 

PREJUDICE; AND ORDER 

[FRCP 41(a)(1) and (c)] 

 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties to this action, through their 

attorneys of record, that the following portions of plaintiff’s Complaint for Damages filed May 

23, 2006 should be dismissed with prejudice pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1) and (c), each party to 

bear its own costs and attorney’s fees: 

1. The word “fifth” in the First Cause of Action at page 5, line 21; 

2. The Second Cause of Action in its entirety at page 6, lines 1-18; 

3. The Sixth Cause of Action in its entirety at page 7, line 25 through page 8, line 21. 

//// 

Case 2:06-cv-01122-MCE -DAD Document 27 Filed 07/23/07 Page 1 of 3
STIPULATION RE: DISMISSAL OF PORTIONS OF COMPLAINT WITH PREJUDICE; ORDER 

2 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Dated: July ___, 2007 Law Office of Stephen A. Munkelt 

 

 _______________________________ 

 Stephen A. Munkelt 

 Attorney for Plaintiff Susan Colbert 

 

DATED: July 2, 2007 ELIE & ASSOCIATES 

 

 ___________________ 

 By: CATHARINE A. CHING 

 Attorney for Defendants 

CITY OF NEVADA CITY, LOU 

TRAVATO, BOB MICANDER and 

PAUL ROHDE 

* * * 

 Pursuant to stipulation of the parties, and FRCP 41(a)(1) and (c), 

 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, that the above portions of the plaintiff’s Complaint are 

hereby dismissed, with prejudice, each party to bear its own costs and attorney’s fees. 

Dated: July 20, 2007

__________________________________ 

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

 

Case 2:06-cv-01122-MCE -DAD Document 27 Filed 07/23/07 Page 2 of 3
STIPULATION RE: DISMISSAL OF PORTIONS OF COMPLAINT WITH PREJUDICE; ORDER 

3 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Colbert, Susan v. City of Nevada City

United States District Court No. 2:06-CV-01122-MCE-DAD 

PROOF OF SERVICE

 I am employed in the County of Sacramento, State of California. I am over the age of 18 

years and not a party to the above-captioned matter. My business address is 11070 White Rock 

Road, Suite 200 in Rancho Cordova, California 95670. 

 On this date, I served the foregoing document described as: 

 

Stipulation and Order of Dismissal of Portions of Complaint, With Prejudice 

 on the parties below by placing a true copy thereof in a sealed envelope and served same on the 

parties/counsel, addressed as follows: 

PLAINTIFF'S COUNSEL:

Stephen A. Munkelt 

206 Providence Mine Road, no. 218 

Nevada City, CA 95959 

T: 530/265-8508 

F: 530/265-0881 

 The following is the procedure in which service of this document was effected: 

 ■ (BY REGULAR MAIL) by placing such envelope(s) with postage thereon fully prepaid in the 

designated area for outgoing mail in accordance with this office's practice, whereby the mail is 

deposited in a U.S. mailbox after the close of the day’s business. 

____ (BY FACSIMILE TRANSMITTAL) by placing a true copy thereof into a facsimile machine 

addressed to the person, address and telephone number shown above. 

 I, hereby declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the 

foregoing is true and correct and this document was executed at Rancho Cordova, California on July 

2, 2007. 

 _______________________

 Rose Duran 

 

Case 2:06-cv-01122-MCE -DAD Document 27 Filed 07/23/07 Page 3 of 3