Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_96-cv-06053/USCOURTS-caed-1_96-cv-06053-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
California Table Grape Commission
Defendant
Delano Farms Company
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1 

US1DOCS 5257963v2

WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE AND DORR LLP 

Seth P. Waxman 

Randolph D. Moss 

Todd Zubler 

Brian M. Boynton #222193 

2445 M Street, N.W. 

Washington, D.C. 20037-1420 

BAKER, MANOCK & JENSEN 

Robert D. Wilkinson #100478 

Joshua S. Daniels #222928 

5260 North Palm Avenue, Suite 421 

Fresno, California 93704-2209 

Counsel for Defendant THE CALIFORNIA TABLE GRAPE COMMISSION 

LAW OFFICES OF BRIAN C. LEIGHTON 

Brian C. Leighton #090907 

701 Pollasky Avenue 

Clovis, CA 93612 

Counsel for Plaintiffs DELANO FARMS COMPANY, THE SUSAN NEILL COMPANY, and 

LUCAS BROS. PARTNERSHIP 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

DELANO FARMS COMPANY, ) 

a Washington corporation, ) 

THE SUSAN NEILL COMPANY, ) Case No. CV-F-96-6053 OWW DLB 

a California corporation, ) 

LUCAS BROS. PARTNERSHIP, ) STIPULATED REVISED SCHEDULE 

a California Partnership, ) AND PROPOSED ORDER 

 ) 

 Plaintiffs, ) 

 ) 

v. ) 

 ) 

THE CALIFORNIA TABLE ) 

GRAPE COMMISSION, ) 

 ) 

 Defendant. ) 

 ) 

______________________________) 

WHEREAS on June 22, 2005, the parties to this action submitted a joint scheduling 

proposal; 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 1:96-cv-06053-OWW -DLB Document 275 Filed 09/06/05 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2 

US1DOCS 5257963v2

WHEREAS counsel for Plaintiffs sought an extension of the August 22, 2005 deadline for 

supplementation of discovery responses in light of his participation in a trial in another case and 

counsel for Defendant agreed to a two week extension of that deadline; and 

WHEREAS the parties have agreed to the following revised schedule; 

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by the parties to this action, through their respective 

attorneys of record, that the following revised schedule be adopted by the Court: 

Event Original Date Revised Date 

Supplementation of Written Discovery Responses in 

Light of Intervening Events or Decisions 

August 22, 2005 September 6, 

2005 

Disclosure of Expert Witnesses September 9, 

2005 

September 23, 

2005 

Supplemental Expert Disclosures September 23, 

2005 

October 7, 2005 

Close of All Discovery October 14, 2005 October 28, 2005 

Parties To Exchange Proposed Statements of 

Undisputed Fact and To Confer re the Proposed 

Statements 

October 28, 2005 November 23, 

2005 

Proposed Statements of Undisputed Fact Filed with 

the Court 

November 11, 

2005 

December 6, 

2005 

Motions for Summary Judgment Filed December 19, 

2005 

January 13, 2006 

Oppositions to Motions for Summary Judgment January 23, 2006 February 10, 

2006 

Replies to Motions for Summary Judgment February 6, 2006 February 24, 

2006 

IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED that the parties address the following issues, if necessary, 

only after the Court has ruled on any summary judgment motion or motions filed by the parties: (1) 

the schedule for addressing the affirmative defenses raised by the Commission in its Amended 

Answers to the Second Amended Complaints; and (2) the schedule for pre-trial motions and a trial, 

including issues such as whether the trial should be bifurcated in any way. 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 1:96-cv-06053-OWW -DLB Document 275 Filed 09/06/05 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3 

US1DOCS 5257963v2

Dated: August 26, 2005 WILMER CUTLER PICKERING 

 HALE AND DORR LLP 

Seth P. Waxman 

Randolph D. Moss 

Todd Zubler 

Brian M. Boynton 

BAKER, MANOCK & JENSEN 

Robert D. Wilkinson 

Joshua S. Daniels 

/S/ Brian M. Boynton 

By _____________________________ 

Brian M. Boynton 

Counsel for Defendant THE CALIFORNIA TABLE 

GRAPE COMMISSION 

Dated: August 26, 2005 LAW OFFICES OF BRIAN C. LEIGHTON 

/S/ Brian C. Leighton (as authorized 8-26-05) 

By ___________________________ 

Brian C. Leighton 

Counsel for Plaintiffs DELANO FARMS COMPANY, 

THE SUSAN NEILL COMPANY, and LUCAS 

BROS. PARTNERSHIP 

ORDER 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

 /s/ OLIVER W. WANGER 

Dated: __August 31, 2005 _____________________________ 

 Oliver W. Wanger 

 United States District Judge 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 1:96-cv-06053-OWW -DLB Document 275 Filed 09/06/05 Page 3 of 3