Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_18-cv-06375/USCOURTS-cand-3_18-cv-06375-2/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Contra Costa County Domestic Relations
Defendant
Olatunji Raheem
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

OLATUNJI RAHEEM,

Plaintiff,

v.

CONTRA COSTA COUNTY DOMESTIC 

RELATIONS,

Defendant.

Case No. 18-cv-06375-WHO 

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND 

RECOMMENDATION AND 

DISMISSING CASE

Re: Dkt. No. 12

Plaintiff Olatunji Raheem filed this case on October 12, 2018. [Dkt. No. 1]. On 

November 20, 2018, Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley issued a screening order 

concluding that Mr. Raheem’s complaint failed Section 1915 review. [Dkt No. 10]. Mr. Raheem 

was given leave to amend his complaint but failed to do so, submitting only a letter citing in 

general several sections of 42 U.S.C. and attaching “documents specific to [his] case as proof that 

child support should be dismissed.” [Dkt. No. 11]. Magistrate Judge Corley reports that Mr. 

Raheem’s letter failed to cure the defects identified in the screening order and recommends that 

the complaint be dismissed. [Dkt. No. 12]. Objections were due by January 29, 2019. As of the 

date of this order, no objections have been filed.

I find Judge Corley’s report thorough and correct; I adopt it in every respect. Accordingly, 

the complaint is dismissed without prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 4, 2019 

William H. Orrick

United States District Judge

Case 3:18-cv-06375-WHO Document 14 Filed 03/04/19 Page 1 of 1