Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_22-cv-00950/USCOURTS-caed-1_22-cv-00950-4/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Ana De La Sierra
Defendant
Robert Rudas
Defendant
Andres Masqueda Serrano
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ANDRES MASQUEDA SERRANO,

Plaintiff,

v.

ROBERT RUDAS, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No.: 1:22-cv-00950-KES-CDB

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND 

RECOMMENDATIONS TO DISMISS 

CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEFENDANTS

(Doc. 17) 

Plaintiff Andres Masqueda Serrano is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil 

rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This matter was referred to a United States 

magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 

On February 15, 2024, the assigned Magistrate Judge issued findings and 

recommendations, recommending this action proceed only on Plaintiff’s Eighth Amendment 

deliberate indifference to serious medical needs claim against Defendant Rudas, that Defendant 

De La Sierra be dismissed from the action, and that any remaining claims in Plaintiff’s complaint 

be dismissed. (Doc. 17.) The findings and recommendations were served on Plaintiff and 

contained notice that any objections were to be filed within fourteen (14) days of service. The 

Magistrate Judge advised Plaintiff that the “failure to file objections within the specified time 

may result in waiver of his rights on appeal.” (Id. at 2, citing Wilkerson v. Wheeler, 772 F.3d 

834, 839 (9th Cir. 2014); Baxter v. Sullivan, 923 F.2d 1391, 1394 (9th Cir. 1991). No objections 

Case 1:22-cv-00950-KES-CDB Document 19 Filed 03/26/24 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

have been filed, and the deadline to do so has expired. (See docket.)

In accordance with the provision of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the Court has conducted a de 

novo review of this case. Having reviewed the file, the Court finds the findings and 

recommendations to be supported by the record and proper analysis. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations issued February 15, 2024 (Doc. 17) are 

ADOPTED in full;

2. This action PROCEEDS solely on Plaintiff’s Eighth Amendment deliberate 

indifference to serious medical needs claim against Defendant Rudas; 

3. Defendant Ana De La Sierra is DISMISSED from the action;

4. The remaining claims in Plaintiff’s complaint are DISMISSED; and

5. This matter is referred back to the assigned Magistrate Judge for further proceedings. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 26, 2024 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:22-cv-00950-KES-CDB Document 19 Filed 03/26/24 Page 2 of 2