Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_07-cv-02687/USCOURTS-cand-4_07-cv-02687-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Cardica, Inc.
Plaintiff
Integrated Vascular Interventional Technologies, L.C.
Defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE (1) RESPONSE TO COMPLAINT AND

(2) CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND RELATED DATES

LA1 983389v.1

SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP 

JEFFREY M. OLSON (SBN 104074)

jolson@sidley.com

PAUL H. MEIER (SBN 115999) 

pmeier@sidley.com 

SAMUEL N. TIU (SBN 216291)

stiu@sidley.com 

555 W. Fifth Street, Suite 4000 

Los Angeles, California 90013 

(213) 896-6000 phone 

(213) 896-6600 fax 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

CARDICA, INC. 

WORKMAN NYDEGGER 

THOMAS R. VUKSINICK (to be admitted pro hac vice) 

tvuksinick@wnlaw.com 

1000 Eagle Gate Tower 

60 East South Temple 

Salt Lake City, UT 84111 

(801) 533-9800 phone 

(801) 328-1707 fax 

Attorneys for Defendant 

INTEGRATED VASCULAR 

INTERVENTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES, L.C. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

CARDICA, INC., a Delaware corporation, 

 Plaintiff, 

v.

INTEGRATED VASCULAR 

INTERVENTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES, L.C., 

a Utah limited liability company, 

 Defendant. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. C07-2687 SBA 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

TO CONTINUE (1) RESPONSE TO 

COMPLAINT AND (2) CASE 

MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND 

RELATED DATES 

Case 4:07-cv-02687-SBA Document 11 Filed 08/29/2007 Page 1 of 4

XXXXXXXX

Case 4:07-cv-02687-SBA Document 12 Filed 09/04/2007 Page 1 of 4 Case 4:07-cv-02687-SBA Document 13 Filed 09/04/07 Page 1 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

LA1 983389v.1

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE (1) RESPONSE TO COMPLAINT AND

(2) CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND RELATED DATES

1

 Whereas Plaintiff Cardica, Inc. (“Cardica”) filed its complaint on May 22, 2007 against 

Defendant Integrated Vascular Interventional Technologies, L.C. (“IVIT”); 

 Whereas the parties have been engaged in settlement negotiations since the filing of the 

complaint but have not succeeded in settling their dispute; 

 Whereas the Court has set a Case Management Conference for September 13, 2007 and 

requires the parties to file their Rule 26(f) report by September 4, 2007; 

 Whereas IVIT was served with the summons and complaint on August 24, 2007, and its 

response to the complaint is currently due on September 13, 2007; 

 Whereas the parties agree that additional time is needed for IVIT to retain counsel, 

investigate the issues alleged in the complaint, and prepare its response to the complaint such that a 

meaningful Rule 26(f) conference can be conducted; 

 Therefore, the parties stipulate, subject to the Court’s approval, that the currently scheduled 

dates be continued as follows: 

 1. The date for IVIT to answer, plead, or otherwise respond to the complaint is 

continued from September 13, 2007 to October 1, 2007; 

 2. The last day for the parties’ meet and confer under Rule 26(f) of the Federal Rules of 

Civil Procedure and to file an ADR certification is continued from August 20, 2007 to October 16, 

2007;

 3. The date for the parties to file a joint Rule 26(f) report is continued from September 

4, 2007 to October 23, 2007; 

Case 4:07-cv-02687-SBA Document 11 Filed 08/29/2007 Page 2 of 4 Case 4:07-cv-02687-SBA Document 12 Filed 09/04/2007 Page 2 of 4 Case 4:07-cv-02687-SBA Document 13 Filed 09/04/07 Page 2 of 4
Case 4:07-cv-02687-SBA Document 11 Filed 08/29/2007 Page 3 of 4

XXXXXXX 3:00XX

October 32,

9/4/07

Case 4:07-cv-02687-SBA Document 12 Filed 09/04/2007 Page 3 of 4 Case 4:07-cv-02687-SBA Document 13 Filed 09/04/07 Page 3 of 4
Case 4:07-cv-02687-SBA Document 11 Filed 08/29/2007 Page 4 of 4 Case 4:07-cv-02687-SBA Document 12 Filed 09/04/2007 Page 4 of 4 Case 4:07-cv-02687-SBA Document 13 Filed 09/04/07 Page 4 of 4