Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-00177/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-00177-7/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Kenneth Murphy
Plaintiff
Shelley Murphy
Plaintiff
Target Corporation
Defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SHELLEY MURPHY and

KENNETH MURPHY,

Plaintiffs, CIV-S-07-0177 LKK EFB PS

vs.

TARGET CORPORATION,

Defendant. ORDER

__________________________________/

On November 27, 2007, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations

herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the

findings and recommendations were to be filed within ten days. No objections were filed.

 Accordingly, the court presumes any findings of fact are correct. See Orland v.

United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1999). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are

reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir.

1983).

The court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and, good cause appearing,

concludes that it is appropriate to adopt the proposed Findings and Recommendations in full.

\\\\\

Case 2:07-cv-00177-LKK -EFB Document 39 Filed 02/12/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

 Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that:

1. The proposed Findings and Recommendations filed November 27, 2007, are

ADOPTED; and

2. This action is dismissed without prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); Local

Rule 11-110.

DATED: February 12, 2008.

Case 2:07-cv-00177-LKK -EFB Document 39 Filed 02/12/08 Page 2 of 2