Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_16-cv-01617/USCOURTS-caed-2_16-cv-01617-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Sacramento County Jail
Defendant
Kevin Lee Williams
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

KEVIN LEE WILLIAMS, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

SACRAMENTO COUNTY JAIL, 

Defendant. 

No. 2:16-cv-1617 MCE AC P 

FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS 

 A recent court notice was served on plaintiff’s address of record and returned by the postal 

service. It appears that plaintiff has failed to comply with Local Rule 183(b), which requires that 

a party appearing in propria persona inform the court of any address change. More than sixtythree days have passed since the court’s notice was returned by the postal service and plaintiff has 

failed to notify the court of a current address. 

 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without 

prejudice for failure to prosecute. See L.R. 183(b). 

 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 

after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections 

with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings 

and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified 

Case 2:16-cv-01617-MCE-AC Document 5 Filed 10/26/16 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2

time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 

(9th Cir. 1991). 

DATED: October 25, 2016 

Case 2:16-cv-01617-MCE-AC Document 5 Filed 10/26/16 Page 2 of 2