Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-07-07143/USCOURTS-ca4-07-07143-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Selwyn Adams
Appellee
Steven Baily
Appellee
Sergeant Depoy
Appellee
K. Hamlin
Appellee
Glenn Hill
Appellee
Nurse Josh
Appellee
Colonel Land
Appellee
Jerry L. Mackling
Appellee
L. Marshall
Appellee
Caral Price
Appellee
S. Tapps
Appellee
S. J. Thompson
Appellee
John Ruffin Williams
Appellant
R. Woodson
Appellee
Lieutenant Wynkoop
Appellee

Document Text:

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

 No. 07-7143 

JOHN RUFFIN WILLIAMS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

JERRY L. MACKLING; STEVEN BAILY, Police

Officer; L. MARSHALL, Sergeant, Police

Officer; S. J. THOMPSON, Sergeant, Police

Officer; SERGEANT DEPOY, Corrections Officer;

LIEUTENANT WYNKOOP, Corrections Officer;

COLONEL LAND, Corrections Officer Supervisor also

known as Major Land; GLENN HILL, Sheriff, Corrections

Officer Superintendent also known as Colonel Hill;

NURSE JOSH, Corrections Facility Nurse on

Duty; CARAL PRICE; SELWYN ADAMS, Dr., M.D.,

Corrections Facility Physician; K. HAMLIN,

Corrections Facility Unit S-1 Nurse

Supervisor; S. TAPPS, Corrections Facility Unit

S-1 Grievance Coordinator; R. WOODSON, Corrections

Facility Unit S-1 Grievance Coordinator,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca Beach Smith, District

Judge. (2:07-cv-00147-RBS)

Submitted: December 20, 2007 Decided: December 27, 2007

Before MICHAEL and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Appeal: 07-7143 Doc: 29 Filed: 12/27/2007 Pg: 1 of 3
- 2 -

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John Ruffin Williams, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 07-7143 Doc: 29 Filed: 12/27/2007 Pg: 2 of 3
- 3 -

PER CURIAM:

John Ruffin Williams appeals the district court’s order

dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C.

§ 1915A(b)(1) (2000) for failure to state a claim. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm for the reasons stated by the district court, Williams v.

Mackling, No. 2:07-cv-147 (E.D. Va. Jul 2, 2007), and deny

Williams’ motion for judgment, in which he reargues the merits of

his claims. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Appeal: 07-7143 Doc: 29 Filed: 12/27/2007 Pg: 3 of 3