Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_09-cv-05544/USCOURTS-cand-3_09-cv-05544-6/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
City of Berkeley
Defendant
Andzej Paczynski
Plaintiff

Document Text:

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ANDZEJ PACZYNSKI,

Plaintiff,

 v.

CITY OF BERKELEY, and DOES 1–100,

Defendants. /

No. C 09-05544 WHA

FURTHER ORDER FOR

PLAINTIFF TO EFFECT

SERVICE OR

FACE DISMISSAL 

The case management conference has now been held twice with no progress. 

The alleged attorney for plaintiff (Andrew Schallaby) did not appear as ordered at the case

management conference reset for today. At the case management conference on April 8,

2010, plaintiff was ordered to serve whatever defendants he wishes to sue with the summons

and complaint and to file a proper proof of service thereof by no later than Friday, April 30,

2010. Plaintiff was warned that if he did not comply, his case was liable to be dismissed for

untimely service, the 120-day period having expired last month.

Now plaintiff, proceeding pro se, has filed a sworn declaration averring that he will file

proof of service by Monday, May 3, 2010. Because he is proceeding pro se, plaintiff will be

given one more chance to file proper proof of service by MAY 3, 2010, or else have his case

dismissed for untimely service.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 3, 2010. WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:09-cv-05544-WHA Document 24 Filed 05/03/10 Page 1 of 1