Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-00145/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-00145-6/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Samuel Vizcarrondo
Plaintiff
Wasco State Prison Medical Department
Defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 The United States Postal Service returned the Findings and Recommendations served on Plaintiff on 1

January 5, 2007, as undeliverable. A notation on the envelope simply indicated: Return to Sender. However,

Plaintiff has not notified the court of any change in his address. Absent such notice, service at a party’s prior address

is fully effective. See Local Rule 83-182(f). 

1

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAMUEL VIZCARRONDO,

Plaintiff,

vs.

WASCO STATE PRISON MEDICAL

DEPARTMENT,

Defendant.

 /

1:06-cv-00145-OWW-SMS-P

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATION (Doc. 20)

ORDER DISMISSING ACTION

Samuel Vizcarrondo (“Plaintiff”) is a prisoner proceeding

pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant

to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States

Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local

Rule 72-302.

On December 20, 2006, the Magistrate Judge filed Findings

and Recommendation herein which were served on the parties and

which contained notice to the parties that any objections to the

Findings and Recommendation were to be filed within eleven (11)

days. To date, the parties have not filed objections thereto.1

Case 1:06-cv-00145-OWW -SMS Document 22 Filed 02/08/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C.

§ 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 73-305, this Court has conducted a

de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the

entire file, the Court finds the Findings and Recommendation to

be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendation, filed December 20,

2006, are ADOPTED in full; and,

2. This action is DISMISSED for Plaintiff’s failure to

prosecute.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 7, 2007 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger 

emm0d6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-00145-OWW -SMS Document 22 Filed 02/08/07 Page 2 of 2