Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-00193/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-00193-2/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Mark Lee Reynolds
Petitioner
United States of America
Respondent

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 On June 26, 2007, the Findings and Recommendation was returned to the Court as “undeliverable.” 1

Pursuant to Local Rule 83-182(f) each party is under a continuing duty to inform the Court of any change of address. 

Absent such notice, service of documents at the prior address of record of the party is effective service. Local Rule

83-182(f). 

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MARK LEE REYNOLDS,

Petitioner,

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Respondent.

 /

CV F 06-00193 OWW DLB HC

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS AND DISMISSING

PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

[Doc. 8]

Petitioner is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. 

On June 12, 2007, the Magistrate Judge issued Findings and Recommendation that the

Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus be DISMISSED for failure to comply with a court order. 

This Findings and Recommendation was served on all parties and contained notice that any

objections were to be filed within ten (10) court days of the date of service of the order. Over ten

(10) days have passed and no party has filed objections.

1

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted

a de novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds that the

Findings and Recommendation is supported by the record and proper analysis. 

Case 1:06-cv-00193-OWW -DLB Document 10 Filed 07/26/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendation issued June 12, 2007, is ADOPTED IN

FULL;

2. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DISMISSED for failure to comply with

a court order; and

3. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to close this action. This terminates this

action in its entirety; and 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 25, 2007 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger 

emm0d6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-00193-OWW -DLB Document 10 Filed 07/26/07 Page 2 of 2