Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-almd-1_04-cv-00279/USCOURTS-almd-1_04-cv-00279-2/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Linda Cannon
Plaintiff
Dyncorp
Defendant
Regina Johnson
Defendant

Document Text:

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

LINDA CANNON, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:04CV279-S

) [WO]

DYNCORP and REGINA JOHNSON, )

)

Defendants. )

ORDER ON MOTION

On 22 April 2005, the defendants filed a Motion To Strike Declaration Testimony of

Linda Cannon (Doc. # 40). Upon consideration of the motion, and for good cause, it is

ORDERED that the motion is DENIED as moot. Although the defendants are correct

in their characterization of several of the plaintiff’s declarations as inadmissible hearsay,

speculation, and conclusory (e.g., Cannon’s co-workers were instructed to check her books

for errors), the court nevertheless considered them in its determination of the motion for

summary judgment. Because the referenced statements were not specifically attributed,

however, they did not strengthen Cannon’s claims.

DONE this 20th day of June, 2005.

/s/ Vanzetta Penn McPherson

VANZETTA PENN MCPHERSON

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:04-cv-00279-VPM Document 47 Filed 06/20/05 Page 1 of 1