Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-01444/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-01444-2/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
James E. Tilton
Respondent
Henry Washington
Petitioner

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

HENRY WASHINGTON, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

v. )

)

JAMES E. TILTON, Director of )

California Department of )

Corrections and Rehabilitation, )

)

Respondent. )

 )

1:06-cv-01444-OWW-SMS-HC

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS (Doc. 7)

ORDER DISMISSING PETITION

FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO SEND

PETITIONER STANDARD 1983 FORM

FOR CLAIMS

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO ENTER

JUDGMENT

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a

Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. 

On December 13, 2006, the Magistrate Judge filed Findings and

Recommendations that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus be

DISMISSED as it does not allege grounds that would entitle

Petitioner to habeas corpus relief, and that the Clerk of Court be

DIRECTED to send Petitioner the standard form for claims pursuant

to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. These Findings and Recommendations were

served on all parties and contained notice that any objections were

to be filed within ten (10) days from the date of service of that

Case 1:06-cv-01444-OWW -SMS Document 8 Filed 01/29/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

order. To date, the parties have not filed objections to the

Findings and Recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636

(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a de novo review of the case. 

Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court concludes that

the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations are supported

by the record and proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed December 13,

2006, are ADOPTED IN FULL;

2. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DISMISSED as it

does not allege grounds that would entitle Petitioner to habeas

corpus relief;

3. The Clerk of Court send Petitioner the standard form for

claims pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983; and, 

4. The Clerk of Court enter judgment.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 26, 2007 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger 

emm0d6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-01444-OWW -SMS Document 8 Filed 01/29/07 Page 2 of 2