Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cr-00168/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cr-00168-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Napoleon Cruz
Defendant
USA
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIP. & [PROP.] ORDER

CR 06 0168 MHP 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

NAPOLEON CRUZ,

Defendant.

 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CR 06 0168 MHP

STIPULATION AND

[PROPOSED] ORDER FINDING

EXCLUDABLE TIME

UNDER SPEEDY TRIAL ACT

18 U.S.C. § 3161(b); (h)(8)(A)&(B)(iv)

The parties made their initial appearance before this Court on May 1, 2006. At

that time, the matter was continued to July 3, 2006 at 10:00 a.m. in order that the

government could provide discovery, defense counsel and defendant could have

reasonable time to review the discovery, and the parties could discuss further proceedings

in the case. The Court granted the parties’ request for a finding that the time between

May 1, 2006 and July 3, 2006 was excluded from the time requirements of the Speedy

Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161 in order to provide the defendant continuity of counsel and

Case 3:06-cr-00168-MHP Document 12 Filed 06/06/06 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIP. & [PROP.] ORDER

CR 06 0168 MHP 2

adequate time for effective preparation, taking into account due diligence. 18 U.S.C. 

§ 3161(h)(8)(A) & (B)(iv).

By order of the Court, the July 3 hearing has been re-scheduled to July 17, 2006 at

10:00 a.m. The parties have conferred and agreed that it is appropriate to extend the

exclusion of time under the Speedy Trial Act to July 17, 2006. Defense counsel and

defendant are in the process of reviewing discovery produced by the government. Once

that review is complete, the parties anticipate engaging in discussions about potential

resolution of the matter. Counsel for the United States will be unavailable for the period

between July 10 and July 17, 2006. In light of all of these circumstances, and the fact that

the defendant needs additional time within which to review the discovery, the parties

jointly request and stipulate to a finding that the time between July 3 and July 17 is

excluded from the time requirements of the Speedy Trial Act. 18 U.S.C. §3161(h)(8)(A)

& (B)(iv).

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

DATED: KEVIN V. RYAN

United States Attorney

 /s/ 

SUSAN E. BADGER

Assistant United States Attorney

/s/

DATED: 

STEPHEN SHAIKEN

Counsel for defendant Napoleon Cruz

Upon the joint stipulation of the parties and for good cause appearing, IT IS

HEREBY ORDERED THAT the time between July 3, 2006 and July 17, 2006 is

excluded from the time requirements of the Speedy Trial Act in order to provide the

defendant adequate time for effective preparation, taking into account due diligence, and

///

///

///

Case 3:06-cr-00168-MHP Document 12 Filed 06/06/06 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIP. & [PROP.] ORDER

CR 06 0168 MHP 3

in order to provide the government continuity of counsel. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(A) &

(B)(iv).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

 

MARILYN HALL PATEL

United States District Judge

June 5, 2006

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Marilyn H. Patel

Case 3:06-cr-00168-MHP Document 12 Filed 06/06/06 Page 3 of 3