Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca11-24-13698/USCOURTS-ca11-24-13698-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Carl M. Hill
Appellant
Scott M. Kaye
Appellee
S. Alexandra Manning
Appellee
Megan Miller
Appellee
Craig L. Schwall
Appellee

Document Text:

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

In the

United States Court of Appeals

For the Eleventh Circuit

____________________

No. 24-13698

Non-Argument Calendar

____________________

CARL M. HILL, 

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

S. ALEXANDRA MANNING, 

County Magistrate; Individual and Official Capacity,

SCOTT M. KAYE, 

Judicial Officer; Individual and Official Capacity,

MEGAN MILLER, 

Guardian Ad Litem/ Mediator; Individual and Official Capacity,

CRAIG L. SCHWALL, 

Superior Court Judge; Official Capacity,

USCA11 Case: 24-13698 Document: 9-1 Date Filed: 01/02/2025 Page: 1 of 3
2 Opinion of the Court 24-13698

Defendants-Appellees.

____________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Georgia

D.C. Docket No. 1:21-cv-04549-SDG

____________________

Before WILSON, JILL PRYOR, and BRANCH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

This appeal is DISMISSED, sua sponte, for lack of jurisdiction. Carl Hill seeks to appeal from the district court’s September 

30, 2024 order denying his motion for reconsideration under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) and denying him relief under 

Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(a)(6). The 30-day statutory 

time limit required Hill to file a notice of appeal from that order on 

or before October 30, 2024. See 28 U.S.C. § 2107(a); Fed. R. App. P. 

4(a)(1)(A). However, Hill did not file his notice of appeal until November 4, 2024.

Lastly, the record contains no basis for relief under Federal 

Rules of Appellate Procedure 4(a)(5) or 4(a)(6). See Fed. R. App. P. 

4(a)(5) (providing that a party may move to extend the time for 

filing a notice of appeal within 30 days of entry of the order or judgment); id. R. 4(a)(6)(A) (providing that the court may reopen the 

time to file an appeal for a period of 14 days where a party does not 

receive timely notice of the entry of the order or judgment). 

USCA11 Case: 24-13698 Document: 9-1 Date Filed: 01/02/2025 Page: 2 of 3
24-13698 Opinion of the Court 3

Accordingly, the notice of appeal is untimely and cannot invoke 

our appellate jurisdiction. See Green v. Drug Enf’t Admin., 

606 F.3d 1296, 1300 (11th Cir. 2010).

No petition for rehearing may be filed unless it complies 

with the timing and other requirements of 11th Cir. R. 40-3 and all 

other applicable rules.

USCA11 Case: 24-13698 Document: 9-1 Date Filed: 01/02/2025 Page: 3 of 3