Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_18-cv-04062/USCOURTS-cand-3_18-cv-04062-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Nancy Berryhill
Defendant
Clarence C. Frazier
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CLARENCE C. FRAZIER,

Plaintiff,

v.

NANCY BERRYHILL,

Defendant.

Case No. 18-cv-04062-TSH 

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE; ORDER 

EXTENDING BRIEFING DEADLINES

On March 29, 2019, the Court granted the parties’ stipulation to extend the deadline for 

Defendant Nancy A. Berryhill, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, to file a response to 

Plaintiff Clarence Frazier’s motion for summary judgment and separate statement of facts to April 

16, 2019. ECF No. 27. As Defendant failed to file a response by the deadline, the Court 

ORDERS Defendant to show cause why sanctions should not be imposed for failure to comply 

with court deadlines. Defendant shall e-file (no chambers copy required) a responsive declaration 

by April 23, 2019. Failure to file a response may result in judgment entered in favor of Plaintiff. 

Defendant is FURTHER ORDERED to file a response to Plaintiff’s motion and a 

responsive statement of facts by April 23, 2019. The Court reminds Defendant that the statement

of facts must be separate from the motion and set forth: (a) for each paragraph of Plaintiff’s 

separate statement, a correspondingly numbered paragraph indicating whether Defendant disputes 

the statement of fact as set forth by Plaintiff and, if disputed, a reference to the specific portion of 

the Administrative Record supporting Defendant’s position; and (b) any additional facts from the 

Administrative Record on which Defendant relies in support of the motion. Each additional fact 

must be set forth in a separately numbered paragraph and cite to a specific portion of the 

Administrative Record where the fact finds support.

Case 3:18-cv-04062-TSH Document 28 Filed 04/17/19 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

The deadline for Plaintiff’s reply brief is EXTENDED to May 7, 2019. If Defendant sets 

forth additional facts in the cross-motion, Plaintiff is reminded that he must file a statement, 

separate from the reply brief, with correspondingly numbered paragraphs indicating whether 

Plaintiff disputes the statement of fact as set forth by Defendant and, if disputed, a reference to the 

specific portion of the Administrative Record supporting Plaintiff’s position. Facts that are not 

already included in the motion and/or opposition are not permitted.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 17, 2019

______________________________________

THOMAS S. HIXSON

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:18-cv-04062-TSH Document 28 Filed 04/17/19 Page 2 of 2