Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca5-16-11077/USCOURTS-ca5-16-11077-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
United States of America
Appellee
Jerry Ware
Appellant

Document Text:

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-11077

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JERRY WARE,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:15-CR-40-2

Before JOLLY, PRADO, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Jerry Ware has moved for leave to 

withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 

U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Ware

has filed a response. The record is not sufficiently developed to allow us to 

make a fair evaluation of Ware’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel; we 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

February 21, 2017

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 16-11077 Document: 00513882344 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/21/2017
No. 16-11077

2

therefore decline to consider the claim without prejudice to collateral review. 

See United States v. Isgar, 739 F.3d 829, 841 (5th Cir. 2014).

We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant parts of the record 

reflected therein, as well as Ware’s response. We concur with counsel’s 

assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. 

Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused 

from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See

5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 16-11077 Document: 00513882344 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/21/2017