Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca10-89-03267/USCOURTS-ca10-89-03267-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Governor, State of Kansas
Appellee
Charles Rentschler
Appellant
Sheriff, Leavenworth County
Appellee

Document Text:

. FILED 

U{lired States ~rt of Appeals 

Tenth Circuit 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

TENTH CIRCUIT 

APR 24 1990 

&OBERT L. HOECK.ER 

Clerk 

CHARLES RENTSCHLER, 

Petitioner-Appellant, 

v. 

SHERIFF, LEAVENWORTH COUNTY, 

and GOVERNOR, STATE OF KANSAS, 

Respondents-Appellees. 

ORDER AND JUDGMENT* 

No. 89-3267 

(D.C. No. 89-3134-S) 

(D. Kansas) 

Before LOGAN, SEYMOUR, and BALDOCK, Circuit Judges. 

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel 

has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially 

assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 

34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument. 

Petitioner Charles Rentschler was convicted of separate 

offenses in federal and Missouri state courts, with his state 

sentence to run consecutive to his federal sentence. After he had 

served his federal sentence in Leavenworth Penitentiary in Kansas, 

* This order and judgment has no precedential value and shall not 

be cited, or used by any court within the Tenth Circuit, except 

for purposes of establishing the doctrines of the law of the case, 

res judicata, or collateral estoppel. 10th Cir. R. 36.3. 

Appellate Case: 89-3267 Document: 01019972004 Date Filed: 04/24/1990 Page: 1 
he was turned over to Leavenworth County officials pending 

extradition to Missouri to serve his state sentence. Petitioner 

sought and was denied habeas corpus relief in the Kansas state 

courts. Thereafter, he filed a habeas corpus petition in federal 

district court. The district court refused to temporarily 

restrain petitioner's extradition to Missouri and ultimately found 

no merit to petitioner's challenge to the extradition. 

After careful review, we are satisfied that the district 

court's analysis contained in its September 22, 1989, order is 

correct. Thus the district court correctly dismissed the petition 

for a writ of habeas corpus and properly dismissed the appeal. 

No rational argument can be made on the merits of this 

appeal. Therefore we deny in forma pauperis status and the 

certificate of probable cause and the appeal is dismissed on its 

merits. 

The mandate shall issue forthwith. 

-2-

Entered for the Court 

James K. Logan 

Circuit Judge 

Appellate Case: 89-3267 Document: 01019972004 Date Filed: 04/24/1990 Page: 2