Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_14-cv-05602/USCOURTS-cand-4_14-cv-05602-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Clyp
Defendant
ClypIt, Inc.
Counter-claimant
Clypmedia.com
Defendant
Clyptech.com
Defendant
Cheryl Ehlman
Cross-defendant
Suryanarayana Mangipudi
Counter-defendant
Baskaran Manivannan
Cross-defendant

Document Text:

Case No.: 4:14-cv-05602-KAW STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF 

DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE 

1 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

BURGOYNE LAW GROUP 

Henry M. Burgoyne, III (SBN 203748) 

870 Market Street, Suite 985 

San Francisco, CA 94102 

Telephone: (415) 795-4070 

Fax: (415) 680-2335 

Hank@BurgoyneLawGroup.com 

Attorney for Plaintiffs and Counterclaim-Defendants 

BASKARAN MANIVANNAN; 

SURYANARAYANA MANGIPUDI; and 

CHERYL EHLMAN 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – OAKLAND DIVISION 

BASKARAN MANIVANNAN; 

SURYANARAYANA MANGIPUDI; and 

CHERYL EHLMAN, 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

CLYPIT, INC., dba CLYP, 

CLYPTECH.com, CLYPMEDIA.com, 

Defendant. 

-------------------------------------------------------

CLYPIT, INC., dba CLYP, 

CLYPTECH.com, CLYPMEDIA.com, 

Counterclaim-Plaintiff, 

v. 

BASKARAN MANIVANNAN; 

SURYANARAYANA MANGIPUDI; and 

CHERYL EHLMAN, 

Counterclaim-Defendants.

CASE NO. 4:14-cv-05602-KAW 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE 

STIPULATION 

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs and Counterclaim-Defendants BASKARAN MANIVANNAN, 

SURYANARAYANA MANGIPUDI, and CHERYL EHLMAN (collectively “Plaintiffs”) filed 

this action against Defendant and Counterclaim-Plaintiff CLYPIT, INC. dba CLYP, 

Case 4:14-cv-05602-KAW Document 36 Filed 09/18/15 Page 1 of 3
Case No.: 4:14-cv-05602-KAW STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF 

DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE 

2 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

CLYPTECH.com, CLYPMEDIA.com (collectively “Defendant,” and with Plaintiffs, the 

“Parties”) alleging claims for: (1) Rescission, (2) Declaratory Relief, (3) Copyright Infringement, 

(4) False Advertising, (5) Unflair Competition, (6) Misappropriation of Trade Secrets, and (7) 

False Advertisement and Unfair Competition under Lanham Act. 

WHEREAS, Defendant and Counterclaim-Plaintiff CLYPIT, INC. dba CLYP, 

CLYPTECH.com, CLYPMEDIA.com filed a counterclaim seeking an order adjudicating 

Copyright Registration No. TXu001916069, obtained by Plaintiffs from the United States 

Copyright Office, to be invalid and unenforceable due to procurement by fraud. 

WHEREAS, the Parties have entered into a written settlement agreement, by which all 

Parties have agreed to release their claims and counterclaims. 

THEREFORE, PLAINTIFFS AND DEFENDANT HEREBY STIPULATE, by and 

through their respective counsel of record to dismiss the above-captioned matter with prejudice, 

each party to bear its own attorneys’ fees and costs. 

 

Dated: 9/15/2015 

Respectfully submitted,

BURGOYNE LAW GROUP 

 /s/Henry M. Burgoyne 

 Henry M. Burgoyne, III

Counsel for Plaintiffs

Dated: 9/15/2015 LAW OFFICES OF THOMAS V. CHRISTOPHER 

 /s/ Thomas V. Christopher

 Thomas V. Christopher

Counsel for Defendant

Case 4:14-cv-05602-KAW Document 36 Filed 09/18/15 Page 2 of 3
Case No.: 4:14-cv-05602-KAW STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF 

DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE 

3 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER 

Based on the stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing therefore, 

IT IS ORDERED that this action be, and hereby is, DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, 

each side to bear its own attorneys’ fees and costs. 

Dated:______________ 

MAGISTRATE JUDGE KANDIS A. WESTMORE

 

9/18/15

Case 4:14-cv-05602-KAW Document 36 Filed 09/18/15 Page 3 of 3