Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_18-cv-01596/USCOURTS-caed-1_18-cv-01596-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Lexington Law Firm
Defendant
Martin Starace
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MARTIN STARACE, individually and on behalf 

of all others similarly situated,

Plaintiff,

v.

LEXINGTON LAW FIRM, and DOES 1 through 

10,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 1:18-cv-01596-DAD-SKO

ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK 

OF COURT TO CLOSE THE CASE

(Doc. 28)

On January 16, 2020, the parties filed a joint stipulation dismissing Plaintiff Martin Starace’s

individual claims with prejudice, and the putative class claims without prejudice. (Doc. 28.)

In light of the parties’ stipulation, Plaintiff’s individual claims have been dismissed with 

prejudice, the putative class claims have been dismissed without prejudice, and this action has been 

terminated. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 

1997). Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is directed to close this case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 21, 2020 /s/ Sheila K. Oberto .

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:18-cv-01596-DAD-SKO Document 29 Filed 01/21/20 Page 1 of 1