Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-09-08212/USCOURTS-ca4-09-08212-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Mary King
Appellant
United States of America
Appellee

Document Text:

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-8212

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

MARY KING, a/k/a Kitty,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, District 

Judge. (3:04-cr-00259-HEH-4)

Submitted: April 29, 2010 Decided: May 3, 2010

Before MOTZ and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Mary King, Appellant Pro Se. Olivia N. Hawkins, OFFICE OF THE 

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 09-8212 Doc: 9 Filed: 05/03/2010 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Mary King appeals the district court’s order finding 

her ineligible for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. 

§ 3582(c)(2) (2006). In her informal appellate brief, King 

failed to challenge the district court’s reason supporting the 

denial of relief. King therefore has forfeited appellate review 

of the eligibility issue. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b) (“The Court 

will limit its review to the issues raised in the informal 

brief.”). Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before the court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Appeal: 09-8212 Doc: 9 Filed: 05/03/2010 Pg: 2 of 2