Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-00583/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-00583-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Will Holly
Plaintiff
John E. Potter
Defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

McGREGOR W. SCOTT

United States Attorney

LYNN TRINKA ERNCE

Assistant United States Attorney

501 I Street, Suite 10-100

Sacramento, California 95814

Telephone: (916) 554-2720

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

WILL HOLLY,

 Plaintiff,

 v.

JOHN E. POTTER, Postmaster General of the

United States, and Does 1 through 50, inclusive, 

 Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 2:07-cv-00583 MCE EFB

STIPULATION AND ORDER RE

FILING OF FIRST AMENDED

COMPLAINT

Plaintiff Will Holly and defendant John E. Potter, Postmaster General of the United States,

hereby stipulate and agree as follows:

Recitals

1. On March 23, 2007, plaintiff filed his complaint (“Original Complaint”). Defendant

Potter answered the Original Complaint on May 23, 2007.

2. The Court entered its Pretrial (Status) Scheduling Order on June 15, 2007.

3. On June 28, 2007, defendant Potter filed a motion to dismiss the second (age

discrimination), third (due process) and fourth (equal protection) claims in the Original Complaint and to

dismiss the Does 1 through 50 (“Doe Defendants”).

4. On August 16, 2007, plaintiff filed a Substitution of Attorneys and a First Amended

Complaint which no longer asserts claims of age discrimination, due process and equal protection.

Case 2:07-cv-00583-MCE -EFB Document 26 Filed 08/30/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

5. Pursuant to the Pretrial (Status) Scheduling Order, no joinder of parties or amendments to

pleadings is permitted without leave of court, good cause having been shown.

Stipulation

WHEREFORE, the parties hereby stipulate and agree as follows:

A. The second, third and fourth claims in the Original Complaint shall be dismissed with

prejudice.

B. Upon Court approval of this Stipulation, the First Amended Complaint shall be deemed

to have been properly filed, except that the Doe Defendants shall be dismissed from the First Amended

Complaint.

C. Defendant Potter shall file his response to the First Amended Complaint within 10 days

of entry of an order approving this Stipulation.

D. Defendant Potter’s pending motion to dismiss shall be removed from the Court’s

calendar.

Respectfully Submitted,

McGREGOR W. SCOTT

United States Attorney

Dated: August 27, 2007 By: /s/ Lynn Trinka Ernce 

 LYNN TRINKA ERNCE

Assistant United States Attorney

LAW OFFICE OF ROY R. LEVIN

Dated: August 27, 2007 By: /s/ Roy R. Levin 

 ROY R. LEVIN

Attorney for Plaintiff

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 30, 2007

________________________________

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:07-cv-00583-MCE -EFB Document 26 Filed 08/30/07 Page 2 of 2