Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_09-cv-03601/USCOURTS-caed-2_09-cv-03601-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
RBC Capital Markets Corporation
Defendant
RBC Dain Rauscher Inc.
Defendant
RBC Wealth Management
Defendant
Carl R. Wright
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1 

STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING DEFENDANT’S 

TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT 

REBECCA D. EISEN, State Bar No. 96129 

MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP 

One Market, Spear Street Tower 

San Francisco, CA 94105-1126 

Tel: 415.442.1000 

Fax: 415.442.1001 

Email: reisen@morganlewis.com 

Attorneys for Defendant 

RBC CAPITAL MARKETS CORPORATION 

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

CARL R. WRIGHT, on behalf of himself, 

all others similarly situated, and the general 

public, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

RBC CAPITAL MARKETS 

CORPORATION, a corporation formerly 

doing business as RBC DAIN 

RAUSCHER INC., RBC DAIN 

RAUSCHER INC., RBC WEALTH 

MANAGEMENT; a division of RBC 

CAPITAL MARKETS CORPORATION, 

and DOES 1 through 50 inclusive, 

Defendants. 

No. 2:09-cv-03601-FCD-GGH 

STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING 

DEFENDANT’S TIME TO RESPOND TO 

PLAINTIFF’S FIRST AMENDED 

COMPLAINT 

The parties, by and through their counsel of record, hereby stipulate and agree as follows, 

and respectfully request that the Court approve and give effect to their stipulation: 

/ / / 

Case 2:09-cv-03601-KJM-GGH Document 16 Filed 01/12/10 Page 1 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2 

STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING DEFENDANT’S 

TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT 

WHEREAS on or about November 17, 2009, Plaintiff Carl R. Wright (“Plaintiff”) 

instituted this civil action against Defendant RBC Capital Markets Corporation in the Superior 

Court of the State of California for the County of Sacramento; 

WHEREAS Plaintiff served the Complaint on Defendant RBC Capital Markets 

Corporation on December 17, 2009. On the same date, Plaintiff contends that he served the 

Complaint on named Defendants RBC Dain Rauscher Inc. and RBC Wealth Management. RBC 

Capital Markets Corporation contends that those defendants are not currently existing legal 

entities; 

WHEREAS on December 29, 2009, Defendant removed this case from the Superior Court 

of California, Sacramento to this United States District Court for the Eastern District of 

California; 

WHEREAS on January 5, 2010, this case was reassigned to the Honorable Frank C. 

Damrell, Jr. and Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows, and all dates then set were vacated, and 

no new dates were set; 

WHEREAS on January 6, 2010, Plaintiff filed a First Amended Complaint; 

WHEREAS counsel for Defendant needs additional time beyond the 14 days provided by 

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a)(3) to conduct a preliminary analysis of the case, so that it 

can respond to Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint in a meaningful way; and 

WHEREAS no previous extensions of time have been requested or granted in this matter, 

and the parties do not believe that the request would alter any currently existing schedule: 

/ / /

Case 2:09-cv-03601-KJM-GGH Document 16 Filed 01/12/10 Page 2 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

3 

STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING DEFENDANT’S 

TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT 

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED among the parties that: 

1. Defendant shall have 20 days following Plaintiff’s January 6, 2010 filing of 

the First Amended Complaint (plus 3 days for service of the First Amended Complaint by 

mail), to and including January 29, 2010, to file a responsive pleading to Plaintiff’s First 

Amended Complaint. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED: 

January 8, 2010 LAW OFFICES OF WILLIAM TORNGREN 

 By:______s/ William Torngren____________ 

 WILLIAM TORNGREN 

One of the Attorneys for Plaintiff 

January 8, 2010 MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP 

 By:________s/ Rebecca D. Eisen__________ 

 REBECCA D. EISEN 

Attorneys for Defendant 

IT IS SO ORDERED: 

 Dated: January 11, 2010 

 

Case 2:09-cv-03601-KJM-GGH Document 16 Filed 01/12/10 Page 3 of 3