Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca13-16-01626/USCOURTS-ca13-16-01626-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Digital Ally, Inc.
Appellee
Utility Associates, Inc.
Appellant

Document Text:

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

UTILITY ASSOCIATES, INC.,

Appellant

v. 

DIGITAL ALLY, INC.,

Appellee 

______________________ 

2016-1626

______________________ 

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark 

Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2014-

00725.

______________________ 

JUDGMENT

______________________ 

STEPHEN M. SCHAETZEL, Meunier Carlin & Curfman, 

LLC, Atlanta, GA, argued for appellant. Also represented 

by DAVID S. MORELAND. 

JENNIFER C. BAILEY, Erise IP, P.A., Overland Park, 

KS, argued for appellee. Also represented by ADAM 

PRESCOTT SEITZ. 

______________________ 

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

Case: 16-1626 Document: 37-2 Page: 1 Filed: 01/13/2017
 

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 

 PER CURIAM (LOURIE, TARANTO, and CHEN, Circuit 

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

January 13, 2017 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

 Date Peter R. Marksteiner

 Clerk of Court

Case: 16-1626 Document: 37-2 Page: 2 Filed: 01/13/2017