Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-02111/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-02111-9/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Sharla Calip
Plaintiff
Housing Authority of the County of Alameda
Defendant
Mary Tanigawa
Defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SHARLA CALIP,

Plaintiff,

v.

MARY TANIGAWA, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 15-cv-02111-MMC 

ORDER VACATING HEARING ON 

DEFENDANT HOUSING AUTHORITY 

OF COUNTY OF ALAMEDA’S MOTION 

FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS 

AND DEFENDANT MARY 

TANIGAWA’S MOTION TO DISMISS

Before the Court are two motions: (1) defendant Housing Authority of the County 

of Alameda’s (“HACA”) “Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings,” filed September 7, 2016; 

and (2) defendant Mary Tanigawa’s (“Tanigawa”) “Motion to Dismiss Entire Action for 

Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction (F.R.C.P. 12(b)(1),” filed October 28, 2016.1 Plaintiff 

has not filed opposition to either motion.

2

 

Having read and considered the papers filed in support of the motions, the Court 

deems the matters suitable for decision thereon, and VACATES the hearing scheduled 

for December 2, 2016.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: November 23, 2016

MAXINE M. CHESNEY

United States District Judge

 

1 On October 28, 2016, Tanigawa also filed a “Notice of Joinder” in HACA’s 

motion.

2 Pursuant to the Civil Local Rules of this District, any opposition was due "not 

more than 14 days after the motion was filed." See Civil L. R. 7-3(a). On November 21, 

2016, plaintiff filed a letter addressed to the Court. Irrespective of whether such filing was 

proper, said letter does not address the instant motions.

Case 3:15-cv-02111-MMC Document 60 Filed 11/23/16 Page 1 of 1