Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-01775/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-01775-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
J.P. Morgan Chase, Inc.
Defendant
Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc.
Defendant
Nelda White
Plaintiff
Patrick White
Plaintiff

Document Text:

Locke Lord LLP

44 Montgomery Street, Suite 4100

San Francisco, CA 94104

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

LOCKE LORD LLP

Regina J. McClendon (SBN 184669)

rmcclendon@lockelord.com

Myles Lanzone (SBN 257791)

myles.lanzone@lockelord.com

44 Montgomery Street, Suite 4100

San Francisco, CA 94104

Telephone: (415) 318-8810

Fax: (415) 676-5816

Attorneys for Defendant

Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

PATRICK WHITE and NELDA WHITE,

Plaintiffs,

vs.

J.P. MORGAN CHASE, INC., SELECT 

PORTFOLIO SERVICING, INC., DOES 1-100,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO.: 2:15-cv-01775-MCE-AC

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO 

EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO 

FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT 

Complaint Filed: July 31, 2015

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs Patrick White and Nelda White (“Plaintiffs”) filed their First 

Amended Complaint in this Court on September 17, 2015;

WHEREAS, the deadline of defendants Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. (“SPS”) and JP 

Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. (“Chase”) (collectively, “Defendants”) to respond to the First Amended 

Complaint is currently October 5, 2015; 

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs and Defendants have begun settlement discussions and wish to 

attempt informal resolution before additional motion practice occurs;

WHEREAS, lead counsel for Plaintiffs will be on vacation and unavailable during the month 

of November 2015;

///

Case 2:15-cv-01775-MCE-AC Document 16 Filed 10/06/15 Page 1 of 3
Locke Lord LLP

44 Montgomery Street, Suite 4100

San Francisco, CA 94104

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs and Defendants have agreed that Defendants shall have until 

November 30, 2015, to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint.

NOW THEREFORE, Plaintiffs and Defendants stipulate that Defendants shall have up to 

and including November 30, 2015, to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiffs’ First Amended 

Complaint.

Dated: October 5, 2015 Respectfully submitted,

LOCKE LORD LLP

By: /s/ Regina J. McClendon

Regina J. McClendon

Myles Lanzone

Attorneys for Defendant

Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc.

Dated: October 5, 2015

KEESAL, YOUNG & LOGAN 

By: /s/ Philip A. McLeod(as authorized on 

9/23/15)

Philip A. McLeod

Attorneys for Defendant

JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. 

Dated: October 5, 2015 WALSH LAW FIRM

By: /s/ James Walsh(as authorized on 

9/24/14) 

James Walsh

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

Patrick White and Nelda White 

Case 2:15-cv-01775-MCE-AC Document 16 Filed 10/06/15 Page 2 of 3
Locke Lord LLP

44 Montgomery Street, Suite 4100

San Francisco, CA 94104

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Pursuant to the foregoing stipulation, Defendants shall have up to and including November 

30, 2015, to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: October 5, 2015

Case 2:15-cv-01775-MCE-AC Document 16 Filed 10/06/15 Page 3 of 3