Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-08-06175/USCOURTS-ca4-08-06175-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Sergeant Bailey

Marshal George Benya
Appellee
Debbie Carter
Appellee
Sharon L. Johnson

Daniel Watlington
Appellant

Document Text:

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-6175

DANIEL WATLINGTON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

DEBBIE CARTER; MARSHAL GEORGE BENYA,

Defendants - Appellees,

and

SHARON L. JOHNSON; SERGEANT BAILEY,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, Chief

District Judge. (5:05-ct-00761-FL)

Submitted: September 11, 2008 Decided: September 16, 2008

Before WILKINSON and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Daniel Watlington, Appellant Pro Se. E. Holt Moore, III,

Wilmington, North Carolina; Steve R. Matheny, Assistant United

States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 08-6175 Doc: 13 Filed: 09/16/2008 Pg: 1 of 2
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Daniel Watlington appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six

Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388

(1971), and 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000). He contends that Defendant

Carter failed to timely file her motion for summary judgment, so

the district court erred in considering that motion. However, the

motion was timely in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(c).

Similarly, Defendant Benya’s motion to dismiss or for summary

judgment was filed within the extension period granted by the

district court, and thus is deemed timely. Accordingly, we affirm.

Watlington v. Johnson, No. 5:05-ct-00761-FL (W.D.N.C. Jan. 8,

2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Appeal: 08-6175 Doc: 13 Filed: 09/16/2008 Pg: 2 of 2