Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca8-19-02020/USCOURTS-ca8-19-02020-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Kendrick Dotstry
Appellant
United States of America
Appellee

Document Text:

United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 19-2020

___________________________

United States of America

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee

v.

Kendrick Dotstry

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant

 ____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the District of Minnesota

 ____________

 Submitted: January 30, 2020

Filed: February 6, 2020

[Unpublished]

____________

Before LOKEN, ERICKSON, and GRASZ, Circuit Judges. 

____________

PER CURIAM.

Kendrick Dotstry appeals the district court’s1

 denial of his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)

motion. Upon careful review of the record, including the well-reasoned opinion of the

1

The Honorable John R. Tunheim, Chief Judge, United States District Court for

the District of Minnesota.

Appellate Case: 19-2020 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/06/2020 Entry ID: 4878525
district court, we conclude there was no abuse of discretion in the denial of postjudgment relief. See Noah v. Bond Cold Storage, 408 F.3d 1043, 1045 (8th Cir. 2005)

(court reviews denial of Rule 60(b) motion for abuse of discretion; Rule 60(b)

authorizes relief in only most exceptional cases). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th

Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________

-2-

Appellate Case: 19-2020 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/06/2020 Entry ID: 4878525