Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-01217/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-01217-3/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Avolve Software Corporation
Defendant
Randall Scheideman
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

_______________________________________________________________________________ 

Joint Stipulation to Dismiss Entire Action With Prejudice; Order Thereon – Page 1

JAMES A. CLARK, ESQ. (SBN 278372) 

TOWER LEGAL GROUP P.C.

1510 J Street, Suite 125

Sacramento, CA 95814

Tel: (916) 361-6009 

Fax: (916) 361-6019 

Email: james.clark@towerlegalgroup.com

ROBERT CARICHOFF (SBN 211066)

DEL RIO & CARICHOFF, P.C.

2335 American River Dr #304

Sacramento, CA 95825

Tel. (916) 378-4705 

Fax. (916) 378-4706

Email: robert@accident-legal.com

Attorneys for Plaintiff

RANDALL SCHEIDEMAN 

DELFINO MADDEN O’MALLEY COYLE & KOEWLER LLP

JENNIFER RANDLETT MADDEN (Bar No. 184905)

CAROLINE M. COLANGELO (Bar No. 278071)

500 Capitol Mall, Suite 1550

Sacramento, CA 95814

Telephone: (916) 661-5700

Facsimile: (916) 661-5701

jmadden@delfinomadden.com

ccolangelo@delfinomadden.com

Attorneys for Defendant

AVOLVE SOFTWARE CORPORATION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RANDALL SCHEIDEMAN,

Plaintiff,

v.

AVOLVE SOFTWARE CORPORATION, 

a Delaware corporation and DOES 1-10 

inclusive,

Defendants.

CASE NO. 2:14-cv-01217-MCE-CKD

JOINT STIPULATION TO DISMISS 

ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE 

(RULE 41 (a) (1) (A)(ii))’ ORDER 

THEREON

Case 2:14-cv-01217-MCE-CKD Document 23 Filed 11/23/15 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

_______________________________________________________________________________ 

Joint Stipulation to Dismiss Entire Action With Prejudice; Order Thereon – Page 2

WHEREAS, Plaintiff Randall Scheideman (“Plaintiff”) filed this action against Defendant 

Avolve Software Corporation (“Defendant”) alleging claims for: (1) failure to pay earned wages or 

commissions; (2) waiting time penalties; (3) wrongful termination in violation of public policy; 

and (4) civil penalties pursuant to the Private Attorneys General Act.

WHEREAS, on Thursday, October 29, 2015, the Parties entered a settlement agreement, by 

which Plaintiff released all claims and causes of action against Defendant, including the claims 

asserted by him in this Action.

THEREFORE, PLAINTIFF AND DEFENDANT HEREBY STIPULATE, by and through 

their respective counsel of record, pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1), to 

dismiss the above-captioned matter with prejudice. This stipulation and dismissal completely 

terminates the above-entitled action against all parties. Each party will bear its/his own attorneys’ 

fees and costs.

Once a stipulation, under Rule 41 (a)(1)(A)(ii), between the parties who have appeared is 

properly filed or made in open court, no order of the court is necessary to effectuate dismissal. 

FRCP 41(a)(1)(A)(ii); Eitel v. McCool, 782 F.2d 1470, 1473 n.4 (9th Cir. 1986). “Case law 

concerning stipulated dismissals under Rule 4141(a)(1)(A)(ii) is clear that the entry of such a 

stipulation of dismissal is effective automatically and does not require judicial approval.” In re 

Wolf, 842 F.2d 464, 466 (D.C. Cir. 1989); Gardiner v. A.H. Robins Co., 747 F.2d 1180, 1189 (8th

Cir. 1984); see also Gambale v. Deutsche Bank AG, 377 F.3d 133, 139 (2d Cir. 2004); 

Commercial Space Mgmt. Co. v. Boeing Co., 193 F.3d 1074, 1077 (9th Cir. 1999).

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

November 4, 2015 DELFINO MADDEN O’MALLEY COYLE

& KOEWLER LLP

By: /s/ JENNIFER RANDLETT MADDEN 

JENNIFER MADDEN

Attorney for Defendant

AVOLVE SOFTWARE CORPORATION

Case 2:14-cv-01217-MCE-CKD Document 23 Filed 11/23/15 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

_______________________________________________________________________________ 

Joint Stipulation to Dismiss Entire Action With Prejudice; Order Thereon – Page 3

November 4, 2015 TOWER LEGAL GROUP P.C.

By: /S/JAMES A. CLARK 

JAMES A. CLARK

 Attorney for Plaintiff

RANDALL SCHEIDEMAN

ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION AND DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

The Court having considered the parties’ stipulation submitted herein and good cause 

appearing therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:

1. That this action is dismissed with prejudice in its entirety as to all parties pursuant 

to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2) based upon the terms and conditions 

stated in the Settlement Agreement;

2. That the Clerk of the Court enter final judgment dismissing this action with 

prejudice and in its entirety.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: November 20, 2015

Case 2:14-cv-01217-MCE-CKD Document 23 Filed 11/23/15 Page 3 of 3