Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-mc-80009/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-mc-80009-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Anna's Linens Company
Respondent
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
Petitioner

Document Text:

-- ---

2

3

MICHAEL D. BRUNO (SBN: 166805)

BRIAN P. MASCHLER (SBN: 111824) GORDON & REES LLP

Embarcadero Center West

275 Battery Street, Suite 2000

San Francisco, CA 94111

Telephone: (415) 986-5900

Facsimile: (415) 986-8054

4

5

6 AttorneysFor: RespondentAnna's Linens,Inc.

WILLIAM R. TAMAYO (SBN: 084965)

7 IIDAVID OFFEN-BROWN (SBN: 63321)

LINDA S. ORDONIO-DIXON (SBN: 172830)

8 IIEQUALEMPLOYMENTOPPORTUNITYCOMMICCION

San Francisco District Office

9 11350The Embarcadero, Suite 500

San Francisco, CA 94105-1260

10 "Telephone: (415) 625-5654

Facsimile: (415) 625-5657

) I

]2 Attorneys For: Applicant EEOC

13

14

]5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

]6

17

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT

OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, ) CASE NO. C 06-80009 MISC MMC (WDB)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

18

19

Applicant, STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

TO ALLOW TWO (2) DAYEXTENSION

FOR RESPONDENT TO FILE OPPOSITIOr

TO SUBPOENA ENFORCEMENT

APPLICATION

Date: April 5, 2006

Time: 2:30 p.m.

MagistrateJudge: Hon.WayneD. Brazil

Courtroom: No.4, 3rdFloor

v.

ANNA'S LINENS COMPANY,

20 Respondent.

21

22

23

24 Applicant, The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, and Respondent, Anna's

25 Linens Company, hereby stipulate as follows:

26 1. The parties having been engaged in productive meet and confer sessions that seem

27

28

to have resolvedthe vast majorityof the itemsin dispute. Thesemeet and confer effortshave

includedan in-personmeetingat the EEOC,and a numberof telephonecalls and email

-1-

STIPULATION TO TWO-DAY EXTENSION

Case 3:06-mc-80009-MMC Document 12 Filed 03/14/2006 Page 1 of 2

XXXXXXXX

Case 3:06-mc-80009-MMC Document 16 Filed 03/21/06 Page 1 of 2
.\IGDO\JOJo'OT973491 I

2

exchanges. The parties are in the process of gathering additional infonnation necessary to

certain compromises and memorializing their agreements and the remaining areas of dispute, if

"'I

.J any.

4

5

2. Good cause existsfor a short extensionfor Respondentto file its opposition,if

any, becausethe parties do not wantto waste the Court's time and resourceswith briefingon

issuesthat will no longerbe in dispute at the hearing. AllowingRespondentto file its brief on 6

7 March 17,2006will providesufficienttime to allowthe partiesto consummatetheir agreements.

8 3. There will be no change in the due date forthe Applicant's reply brief. It will still

By:

LINDA"S. ORDONIO-DIXON

Attorneys for Applicants

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY

COMMISSION

19

By!

20

21

22

ORDER

23

24

Good cause appearing therefor, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Respondent may

file its brief on or before March 17,2006.

25 Dated: MAGISTRATE JUDGE WAYNE D. BRAZIL

26

27

JUDGE OF THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

28

-2-

STIPULATION FOR TWO-DAY EXTENSION

9 IIbe filed on or before March 22, 2006.

10 IIDated: March -¥-, 2006

] 1

]2

13

14

15

16 Dated: March, 2006

17

18

Case 3:06-mc-80009-MMC Document 12 Filed 03/14/2006 Page 2 of 2

3/17/06

Case 3:06-mc-80009-MMC Document 16 Filed 03/21/06 Page 2 of 2