Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ared-4_93-cr-00068/USCOURTS-ared-4_93-cr-00068-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Lancell Maurice Harris
Defendant
United States of America
Plaintiff

Document Text:

OAO 247 (02/08) Order Regarding Motion for Sentence Reduction

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

Eastern District of Arkansas

United States of America )

)

)

)

)

)

v.

Lancell Maurice Harris Case No: 4:93CR00068-01 GTE

USM No: 19622-009 

Date of Previous Judgment: December 1, 1993 Jenniffer Horan

(Use Date of Last Amended Judgment if Applicable) Defendant’s Attorney

Order Regarding Motion for Sentence Reduction Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2)

Upon motion of X the defendant ’ the Director of the Bureau of Prisons ’ the court under 18 U.S.C.

§ 3582(c)(2) for a reduction in the term of imprisonment imposed based on a guideline sentencing range that has

subsequently been lowered and made retroactive by the United States Sentencing Commission pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

§ 994(u), and having considered such motion,

IT IS ORDERED that the motion is:

’ DENIED. X GRANTED and the defendant’s previously imposed sentence of imprisonment (as reflected in 

the last judgment issued) of 421 Months months is reduced to 397 Months

 

 .

I. COURT DETERMINATION OF GUIDELINE RANGE (Prior to Any Departures)

Previous Offense Level: 32 Amended Offense Level: 30

Criminal History Category: I Criminal History Category I

Previous Guideline Range: 121 to 151 months Amended Guideline Range: 97 to 121 months

II. SENTENCE RELATIVE TO AMENDED GUIDELINE RANGE

The reduced sentence is within the amended guideline range.

The previous term of imprisonment imposed was less than the guideline range applicable to the defendant at the time 

of sentencing as a result of a departure or Rule 35 reduction, and the reduced sentence is comparably less than the

amended guideline range.

’ Other (explain):

III. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS

Except as provided above, all provisions of the judgment dated 12/1/93 shall remain in effect.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Order Date: 7/1/08 /s/ Garnett Thomas Eisele

Judge’s signature

Effective Date: Garnett Thomas Eisele, U.S. District Judge

(if different from order date) Printed name and title

Case 4:93-cr-00068-DPM Document 62 Filed 07/01/08 Page 1 of 1