Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-02377/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-02377-4/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Digital Video Systems
Defendant
Glenbrook Capital Limited Partnership
Plaintiff
Mali Kuo
Defendant
Douglas Watson
Defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 _______________________________________

Stip. To Extend Time to Respond to Amend.

Complaint – Case No. C 07-02377 JSW 1

Robert A. Spanner, Esq., State Bar No. 60308

TRIAL & TECHNOLOGY LAW GROUP

A Professional Law Corporation

545 Middlefield Road, Suite 220

Menlo Park, California 94025

Telephone: (650) 324-2223

Facsimile: (650) 324-0178

Attorneys for Defendants 

DIGITAL VIDEO SYSTEMS, INC., 

DOUGLAS WATSON and MALI KUO

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GLENBROOK CAPITAL LIMITED

PARTNERSHIP,

Plaintiffs,

vs.

MALI KUO, et al.,

Defendants.

__________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. C 07-02377 JSW

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]

ORDER EXTENDING DATE TO

RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S SECOND

AMENDED COMPLAINT

(Civ. L.R. 6-1, 6-2)

Pursuant to Civ. L.R. 6-1(b) and 6-2(a), Plaintiff Glenbrook Capital Limited Partnership

(“Plaintiff”) and Defendants Digital Video Systems, Inc., Douglas Watson and Mali Kuo

(collectively “Defendants”), by and through their respective counsel, stipulate and agree as

follows:

WHEREAS Defendants’ response to Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint is

presently due no later than June 18, 2008, and

Case 3:07-cv-02377-JSW Document 73 Filed 06/06/2008 Page 1 of 5 Case 3:07-cv-02377-JSW Document 74 Filed 06/09/08 Page 1 of 5
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 _______________________________________

Stip. To Extend Time to Respond to Amend.

Complaint – Case No. C 07-02377 JSW 2

WHEREAS due to the unavailability of the principal attorney assigned to briefing in this

case for almost a month due to vacation schedules, Defendants request an additional two weeks

to respond to Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint;

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by the parties that Defendants Digital

Video Systems, Inc., Douglas Watson and Mali Kuo shall file their response to Plaintiff’s

Second Amended Complaint no later than July 3, 2008.

This Stipulation is not requested for purposes of delay. The case is not yet at issue, and

the initial case management conference has not been held.

The following time modifications have been made in this case:

• on June 13, 2007 Defendant DVS moved for an order extending until July 19, 2007 the

date by which DVS was required to respond Plaintiff’s original complaint, which order

was granted by the Court on June 20, 2007

• on July 5, 2007 Defendants Kuo and Watson moved for an order extending until July 19,

2007 the date by which they were required to respond Plaintiff’s original complaint,

which order was granted by the Court on July 11, 2007

• the parties previously stipulated that the Case Management Conference be continued

two months from its originally-scheduled date of August 29, 2007, which the Court

ordered on August 27, 2007

• following the Court’s issuance of its Order granting in part and denying in part

Defendants’ motion to dismiss the original Complaint, the parties stipulated to an

additional continuation of the Case Management Conference, which resulted in the

Case 3:07-cv-02377-JSW Document 73 Filed 06/06/2008 Page 2 of 5 Case 3:07-cv-02377-JSW Document 74 Filed 06/09/08 Page 2 of 5
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 _______________________________________

Stip. To Extend Time to Respond to Amend.

Complaint – Case No. C 07-02377 JSW 3

Court’s October 3, 2007 Order setting the Case Management Conference date for

December 18, 2007

• on November 13, 2007 Defendants moved to extend the Case Management Conference,

and on November 26, 2007 the Court issued a Clerk’s Notice setting the Case

Management Conference on January 22, 2008. On December 14, 2007, the Court issued

a Clerk’s Notice Rescheduling Hearing, setting the Case Management Conference on

March 11, 2008

• on February 15, 2008 Defendants moved to continue the Case Management Conference. 

On February 21, 2008 the Court issued a Clerk’s Notice vacating the Case Management

Conference, and then on February 25, 2008 granted Defendants’ motion and scheduled

the Case Management Conference for May 13, 2008. On April 7, 2008 the case was

reassigned to this Court, and the Case Management Conference was vacated in the

Reassignment Order

• on April 21, 2008 the parties submitted a stipulation and proposed order to permit

Plaintiff to file its Second Amended Complaint by May 19, 2008 and to permit

Defendants to file their response thereto no later than 30 days thereafter. The Court

granted the parties’ stipulation and entered an Order on April 22, 2008.

By entering into this Stipulation, neither Plaintiff nor Defendants waive any rights,

claims or defenses it or they might have in this action. This Stipulation constitutes the entire

agreement among the parties, and may be signed in counterparts and/or by facsimile. The 

Case 3:07-cv-02377-JSW Document 73 Filed 06/06/2008 Page 3 of 5 Case 3:07-cv-02377-JSW Document 74 Filed 06/09/08 Page 3 of 5
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 _______________________________________

Stip. To Extend Time to Respond to Amend.

Complaint – Case No. C 07-02377 JSW 4

undersigned hereby consent to the terms set forth in this Stipulation.

Dated: ________________ KERR & WAGSTAFFE, LLP

Attorneys for Plaintiff

GLENBROOK CAPITAL LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

By: _____________________________________

Adrian Sawyer

Dated: ________________ TRIAL & TECHNOLOGY LAW GROUP

A Professional Corporation

Attorneys for Defendants

DIGITAL VIDEO SYSTEMS, INC.,

DOUGLAS WATSON and MALI KUO

By: _____________________________________

Robert A. Spanner

DECLARATION OF CONSENT

Pursuant to General Order No. 45, Section X(B) regarding signatures, I attest under

penalty of perjury that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from Adrian

Sawyer. 

Dated: ________________ TRIAL & TECHNOLOGY LAW GROUP

A Professional Corporation

Attorneys for Defendants

DIGITAL VIDEO SYSTEMS, INC.,

DOUGLAS WATSON and MALI KUO

By: _____________________________________

Robert A. Spanner

Case 3:07-cv-02377-JSW Document 73 Filed 06/06/2008 Page 4 of 5

June 6, 2008

/s/ Adrian Sawyer

June 6, 2008 June 6, 2008 /s/ Robert A. Spanner /s/ Robert A. Spanner

Case 3:07-cv-02377-JSW Document 74 Filed 06/09/08 Page 4 of 5
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 _______________________________________

Stip. To Extend Time to Respond to Amend.

Complaint – Case No. C 07-02377 JSW 5

ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: ________________________ ________________________________________

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

Case 3:07-cv-02377-JSW Document 73 Filed 06/06/2008 Page 5 of 5

June 9, 2008

Case 3:07-cv-02377-JSW Document 74 Filed 06/09/08 Page 5 of 5