Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-03304/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-03304-4/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
City and County of San Francisco
Defendant
Damien Fahey
Defendant
Adrienne Macbeth
Plaintiff
Kevin Worrell
Defendant

Document Text:

1 SANFORD M. CIPINKO, Esq., SBN 88102

JEREMY CLOYD, Esq. SBN 239991

2 LAW OFFICES OF SANFORD M. CIPINKO

55 FRANCISCO STREET, SUITE 403

3 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94133

VOICE: (415) 693-9905

4 FACSIMILE: (415) 693-9904

5

6

7

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

9

10

11

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

12 ADRIENNE MACBETH, )

)

)

)

vs. )

15 )

16 CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN ~

FRANCISCO, a municipal corporation; )

17 KEVIN WORRELL, individually and in his )

18 official capacity as a police officer for the )

CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN )

19 FRANCISCO; DAMIEN FAHEY, )

individually and in his official capacity as a )

20 police officer for the CITY AND COUNTY )

'OF SAN FRANCISCO; and DOES 1-50, )

21 individually and in their official capacities. ~

22 )

)

)

13

Plaintiff,

14

23

Defendants.

24

Case No. C07-03304 MEJ

JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT

STATEMENT AND [PROPOSED] CASE

MANAGEMENT ORDER

25 The parties to the above-entitled action submit this Joint Case Management

26 Statement and [Proposed] Case Management Order and request the Court to adopt it

27 as the Case Management Order in this case, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil

28 Procedure 16 and Civil Local Rule 16-10(b).

JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT AND [PROPOSED] CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER 1

CASE NO. C07-03304 MEJ

ORDER VACATING NOVEMBER 15 

CMC

Case 3:07-cv-03304-MEJ Document 23 Filed 11/08/07 Page 1 of 14
1 JOINTCASEMANAGEMENTSTATEMENT

2 1. Jurisdiction and Service:

3 This action arises under 42 U.S.C. §§1983, 1988 and California state law.

4 Jurisdiction is conferred upon this court by 28 U.S.C. §§1331 and 1343. Service on the

5 defendants is complete.

6 2. Facts

7 Plaintiff Adrienne Macbeth alleges that on March 31,2006, Officers Kevin Worrell

8 and Damien Fahey of the San Francisco Police Department handcuffed her, took her to

9 an alley and then beat her lying face down and handcuffed when she kicked the door to

10 a bar. Plaintiff further alleges that when she refused to sign a citation her head was

11 struck against the officers' patrol car.

12 Plaintiff claims that the above facts represent excessive use of force by officers

13 of the City and County of San Francisco and that said use of force is symptomatic of the

14 City and County of San Francisco's policies, procedures, and training of officers,

15 particularly in the North Beach area of San Francisco.

16 Defendants deny the allegations.

17 The parties dispute the reasons and necessity for the use force and the extent to

18 which force was used.

19 3. Legal Issues

20 The parties dispute the legality of the search and seizure under the Fourth

21 Amendment, specifically with regards to the use of force.

22 4. Motions

23 Defendants filed a motion to dismiss causes of action 2-9, which was granted.

24 There are no pending motions. Defendants may file a motion for summary judgment.

25 5. Amendment of Pleadings

26 The parties do not expect to amend the pleadings.

27 6. Evidence Preservation

28 Plaintiff has notified defendants that the Office of Citizen Complaints has a file

JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT AND [PROPOSED] CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER 2

CASE NO. C07-03304 MEJ

Case 3:07-cv-03304-MEJ Document 23 Filed 11/08/07 Page 2 of 14
1 related to this action that includes photographs and video, which have not been

2 released to plaintiffs.

3 Defendants have requested that evidence be preserved.

4 7. Disclosures

5 There has been timely compliance with the initial disclosure requirements of Fed.

6 R. Civ. P. 26(f). Plaintiff's disclosures included a list of witnesses, a calculation of

7 damages and copies of supporting documentation. Defendants' disclosures include a

8 list of witnesses and a list of documents in the custody or control of defendants.

9 8. Discovery

10 The parties do not anticipate any need for departure from Magistrate Judge

11 Maria-Elena James standing order regarding discovery.

12 Plaintiff's position is that due to the number of witnesses, it is likely that there will

13 be approximately twelve depositions in total, exclusive of expert witnesses. Plaintiff has

14 produced her medical records, billing records and supporting employment records (with

15 the exception of psychiatric records, which are being located).

16 Plaintiff will request that defendant produce the documents identified in their

17 initial disclosures as well as: the internal affairs files regarding misconduct complaints;

18 policies and procedures manual; forms used by internal affairs for recording and

19 processing complaints; annual reports of the internal affairs division; a listing of

20 complaints; investigation case files; audits and reviews of the officers' unit; complaints

21 involving administrative violations by the officers; use of force reports for the officers;

22 records of arrests by the individual officers; reports regarding injuries received by the

23 officers; reports regarding injuries to persons arrested by the officers; performance

24 evaluations; and training materials that concern the use of force.

25 Defendants will need to take discovery of witnesses to the event as well as

26 discovery relating to plaintiff's damages claims (physical and psychological claims, and

27 lost wage claims). At this point it is too early for defendants to determine if they will

28 need to request additional depositions.

JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT AND [PROPOSED] CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER 3

CASE NO. C07-03304 MEJ

Case 3:07-cv-03304-MEJ Document 23 Filed 11/08/07 Page 3 of 14
1 9. Class Actions

2 Not applicable

3 10.Related Cases

4 None

5 11.Relief

6 Plaintiff seeks monetary damages as follows: Medical Expenses of $1807.33

7 (excluding psychiatrist costs, which plaintiff is locating); Lost income of $119,000.00

8 (calculated by a $62,000.00 annual salary plus a minimum of commission of 20/0on

9 $2,000,000.00 for 14 months); General Damages of $3,000,000.00 (estimated).

10 12.Alternative Dispute Resolution:

11 The parties have discussed and request the following court ADR process:

12 mediation with another magistrate judge to be set before July 2008. Discovery

13 important to settlement includes: depositions of plaintiff and defendants and disclosure

14 of the documents listed in paragraph 8 above.

15 Defendants believe that discovery into plaintiff's damages claims will be

16 necessary for any settlement discussions to be meaningful.

17 13.Consent to Magistrate Judge for AU Purposes:

18 The parties have both consented to the assignment of this case to a United

19 States Magistrate Judge for Trial and have filed their consent forms with the Court.

20 14.Other References:

21 The parties do not feel that this case is appropriate for other references.

22 15.Narrowing of Issues:

23 None

24 16.Expedited Scheduling:

25 Plaintiff believes that this case can be prepared for trial by July 2008.

26 Defendants believe that this case will not be ready for trial until November 2008 or later.

27 17.Scheduling:

28 The parties do not believe any reason exists for departure from the scheduling

JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT AND [PROPOSED] CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER 4

CASE NO. C07-03304 MEJ

Case 3:07-cv-03304-MEJ Document 23 Filed 11/08/07 Page 4 of 14
1 set forth in the attached proposed order.

2 18.Trial

3 The case will be tried to a jury. The parties anticipate that the trial may last 10

4 court days.

5 19.Disclosureof Non-PartyInterestedEntities or Persons:

6 Plaintiff is unaware of entities with either a financial interest in the subject matter

7 of the controversy or any other kind of interest that could be substantially affected by the

8 outcome of the proceeding. Defendants are exempt from the disclosure requirement as

9 a government entity.

10

11 DATED: _

12

13

14

15

16

LAW OFFICES OF SANFORD M. CIPINKO

By:

SANFORD M. CIPINKO

Attorneys for Plaintiff

DATED: _

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

By:

RONALD P. FLYNN

Attorneys for Defendants

JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT AND [PROPOSED] CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER 5

CASE NO. C07-03304 MEJ

Case 3:07-cv-03304-MEJ Document 23 Filed 11/08/07 Page 5 of 14
1 [PROPOSED] CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER

2 Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 16, the Court conducted a case management

3 conference on November 15, 2007.

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

A.

B.

ADR Program

1.. The parties are hereby referred to _

2. The parties shall file their ADR certification by the date assigned by the

initial case management schedule received from the Clerk of the Court,

pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8.

Jury or Court Trial:

1. The parties shall designate in both their pleadings and joint case

management statement whether the trial request is a jury trial or court trial:

[x] Plaintiff requests a jury trial;

[x] Defendants request a jury trial

C. Pretrial Motions:

D.

1. All pretrial motions shall be filed in accordance with Civil L.R. 7. A motion

shall be noticed pursuant to Civil L.R. 7-2 without calling the Court. Civil

law and motion is heard on Thursday mornings at 10:00 a.m.

Discovery:

1. The parties shall abide by Judge James' standing order regarding

discovery and dispute procedures.

Disclosure of Expert Witnesses:

1. Any party wishing to present expert witness testimony with respect to a

claim or defense shall serve on all other parties the name, address,

qualifications, resume, and a written report which complies with Federal

E.

Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(2)(8) on or before (210 days

before trial).

2. This disclosure must be made with respect to a person who is either (a)

specifically retained or specially employed to provide expert testimony

JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT AND [PROPOSED] CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER 6

CASE NO. C07-03304 MEJ

a settlement conference with a 

magistrate judge5/12/08

Case 3:07-cv-03304-MEJ Document 23 Filed 11/08/07 Page 6 of 14
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence 702 or (b) a regular employee or

agent or treating physician who may be called to provide expert opinion

testimony.

3. A party or counsel has a continuing duty to supplement the disclosure of

expert witnesses when required under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure

26(e)(1).

F. Rebuttal Expert Witnesses:

1. If the testimony of the expert is intended solely to contradict or rebut

opinion testimony on the same subject matter identified by another party,

the party proffering a rebuttal expert shall make the disclosures required

by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(2)(B), no later than

(200 days before the trial).

Limitation on Testimony by Expert Witnesses:

1. Unless the parties enter into a written stipulation otherwise, upon timely

objection, an expert witness shall be precluded from testifying about any

actions or opinions not disclosed prior to the expert's deposition. This is to

ensure that all factual material upon which expert opinion may be based

and all tests and reports are completed prior to the expert deposition.

2. Unless application is made prior to the close of expert discovery, each

party is limited to calling only one expert witness in each discipline

involved in the case.

G.

3. Any party objecting to the admissibility of the testimony of person

disclosed as an expert witness must file a written motion in limine to

exclude the testimony no later than the deadline set in this order for filing

motions in limine

H. Close of Discovery:

1. All discovery, including depositions of expert witnesses, must be

completed by (185 days before trial).

JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT AND [PROPOSED] CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER 7

CASE NO. C07-03304 MEJ

6/6/08 5/22/08

Case 3:07-cv-03304-MEJ Document 23 Filed 11/08/07 Page 7 of 14
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16(b) and Civil L.R. 26-2, a

discovery request or stipulation that calls for responses or depositions

after the discovery cut-off date are not enforceable except by order of the

Court and upon a showing of good cause.

3. Pursuant to Civil L.R. 26-2, no motions to compel discovery may be filed

later than 10 days after the discovery cut-off date

Dispositive Motions:

1. Pursuant to Civil L.R. 7-2, all dispositive motions shall be filed, served and

I.

noticed by (155 days prior to trial). The parties shall file a

joint statement of undisputed facts pursuant to Civil L.R. 56-2(b) when

filing a motion for summary judgment or summary adjudication.

2. The Court shall hear dispositive motions on ( 120 prior

J.

days to trial, during the Court's Thursday law and motion calendar) at

10:00 a.m. in Courtroom B, 15th Floor of the Federal Building, located at

450 Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco, California.

Exchange and Filing of Trial Papers:

1. By (60 days before trial) lead counsel who will try the case shall meet and

confer with respect to the preparation and content of the joint pretrial

conference statement and shall exchange (but not file or lodge) the papers

described in paragraph 2 below.

2. By ( 45 days before trial) counsel shall file the papers described in Federal

Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(3) and a joint pretrial conference statement

including the following:

(A) Substance of the Action: A brief description of the substance of chums

and defenses which remain to be decided.

(8) Relief Prayed: A detailed statement of all the relief claimed, particularly

itemizing all elements of damages claimed as well as witnesses,

documents or other evidentiary material to be presented concerning the

JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT AND [PROPOSED] CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER 8

CASE NO. C07-03304 MEJ

10/23/08 10/9/08 8/7/08 7/3/08

Case 3:07-cv-03304-MEJ Document 23 Filed 11/08/07 Page 8 of 14
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 3.

amount of damages.

(C) Undisputed Facts: A plain and concise statement of all relevant facts

not reasonably disputable, as well as which facts parties will stipulate for

incorporation into the trial record without the necessity of supporting

testimony or exhibits.

(D) Disputed Factual Issues: A plain and concise statement of all disputed

factual issues which remain to be decided.

(E) Agreed Statement: A statement assessing whether all or part of the

action may be presented upon an agreed statement of facts.

(F) Stipulations: A statement of stipulations requested or proposed for

pretrial or trial purposes.

(G) Witness list: A list of all witnesses to be called for trial. The parties

shall submit a page-length detailed summary of the substance of the

proposed testimony of each witness, which shall also specify to which

disputed fact the testimony relates and an estimate of the time required for

direct and cross examination of each prospective witness.

(H) Exhibit list: A list of all exhibits to be offered at trial. The exhibit list

shall list each proposed exhibit by its number or alphabetical letter,

description and sponsoring witness. All documents shall be authenticated

prior to trial.

(I) Estimated Time of Trial: An estimate of the number of hours needed for

the presentation of each party's case.

(J) Settlement: A statement summarizing the status of the parties'

settlement negotiations.

No party shall be permitted to offer any witness or exhibit in its case

in chief that is not disclosed in its witness or exhibit list without

leave of the Court for good cause shown.

Motions in limine: Counsel are directed to meet and confer to resolve any

JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT AND [PROPOSED] CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER 9

CASE NO. C07-03304 MEJ

Case 3:07-cv-03304-MEJ Document 23 Filed 11/08/07 Page 9 of 14
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

evidentiary disputes prior to filing motions in limine. Any motions in limine

shall be filed (45 days prior to trial). Any Opposition to motions in

limine shall be filed (38 days prior to trial). These matters will be

deemed submitted on the papers without oral argument, unless the Court

orders otherwise.

4. Trial Briefs: Counsel shall file trial briefs setting forth the applicable legal

standard, pursuant to Ninth Circuit authority, all significant disputed issues

of law, including foreseeable procedural and evidentiary issues by

_____ (30 days prior to trial).

5. Joint Proposed Voir Dire (Jury Trial Only): Counsel should submit a joint

set of requested voir dire to be posed by the Court by (30 days

prior to trial). Any voir dire questions on which counsel cannot agree shall

be submitted separately by (30 days prior to trial). Counsel

will be allowed brief follow-up voir dire after the Court's questioning.

6. Joint Proposed Jury Instructions (Jury Trial Only): Jury instructions § 1.01

through § 2.02 and § 3.01 through § 3.15 from the Manual of Model Civil

Jury Instructions for the Ninth Circuit (1998 Edition) will be given absent

objection. Counsel shall submit a joint set of additional proposed jury

instructions by (30 days prior to trial). The instructions

shall be ordered in a logical sequence, together with a table of contents.

Any instruction on which counsel cannot agree shall be marked as

"disputed, II and shall be included within the jointly submitted instructions

and accompanying table of contents, in the place where the party

proposing the instruction believes it should be given. Argument and

authority for and against each disputed instruction shall be included as

part of the joint submission, on separate sheets directly following the

disputed instruction. The Court prefers that all jury instructions conform to

the Manual of Model Civil Jury Instructions for the Ninth Circuit.

JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT AND [PROPOSED] CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER 10

CASE NO. C07-03304 MEJ

11/7/08 11/7/08 11/7/08 11/7/08 10/30/08

10/23/08

Case 3:07-cv-03304-MEJ Document 23 Filed 11/08/07 Page 10 of 14
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

If possible, counsel shall deliver to the Courtroom Deputy a copy of their

joint proposed jury instructions on a computer disk in WordPerfect format.

The disk label shall include the name of the parties, the case number and

be entitled "Proposed Jury Instructions."

At the close of Defendant's case in chief, the Court shall hear oral

argument on the disputed jury instructions and will then render its rulings.

7. Proposed Verdict Forms, Joint or Separate (Jury Trial Only): Counsel shall

submit any joint proposed verdict forms and shall submit their separate

verdict forms by (30 days prior to trial).

Whenever possible, counsel shall deliver to the Courtroom Deputy a copy

of their joint proposed verdict forms on a computer disk in WordPerfect.

The disk label shall include the name of the parties, the case number and

be entitled "Proposed Verdict Forms."

8. Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law (Court Trial Only):

Counsel shall submit joint proposed findings of facts QY (30 days prior to

trial). Counsel shall submit separately a copy of their disputed findings of

fact and conclusions of law by (30 days prior to trial).

K.

Whenever possible, counsel shall deliver to the Courtroom Deputy a copy

of their joint proposed findings of fact on a computer disk in WordPerfect.

The disk label shall include the name of the parties, the case number and

be entitled "Joint Proposed Findings of Facts."

Pretrial Conference:

1. On (30 days prior to trial, during the Court's Thursday law

and motion calendar is held on Thursdays) the Court shall hold a pretrial

conference at 10:00 a.m, in Courtroom B, 15th Floor of the Federal

Building, located at 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco, California.

Lead counsel who will try the case must attend the pretrial conference.

The purpose of the pretrial conference is for the Court to rule on any

JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT AND [PROPOSED] CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER 11

CASE NO. C07-03304 MEJ

November 6, 2008 11/7/2008 11/7/08

Case 3:07-cv-03304-MEJ Document 23 Filed 11/08/07 Page 11 of 14
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

issues raised in the final pretrial conference statement, motions in limine,

and to discuss the trial of the case.

L. Final Pretrial Conference:

M.

1. On (4 days prior to trial, during the Court's Thursday law and motion

calendar) the Court shall hold a final pretrial conference to address any

outstand ing trial issues.

Trial Date:

1. The trial shall commence [with jury selection taking place] on

______ (Trial schedule: Monday through Thursday, at 1:30 p.m.

to 5:00 p.m.). The trial shall last __ days.

2. For any documents, including the deposition of a witness testifying at trial,

which will be shown presented to a witness but will not be admitted into

evidence, counsel shall bring the original plus three clean copies of the

documents. The original document will be handed to the Court during

testimony, and the clean copies of the document will be given to the

witness during the examination and to opposing counsel.

3. Counsel shall maintain their 0- exhibits during trial. Exhibits are to be

premarked with exhibit tags stapled to the upper lefthand comer. If a photo

or chart is being used as an exhibit, the exhibit tag should be placed on

the back side of the exhibit. The Court will only admit premarked exhibits

which were listed on the earlier filed exhibit list.

Plaintiff shall mark the exhibits numerically; Defendant shall mark

the exhibits alphabetically. The exhibit markers shall each contain the

name and number of the case, the number or alphabetical letter of the

exhibit, and blank spaces to accommodate the date admitted and theDeputy Clerk's initials.

4. On the day of trial, counsel shall bring the original premarked exhibits, a

copy of the premarked exhibits for opposing counsel and two binders

JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT AND [PROPOSED] CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER 12

CASE NO. C07-03304 MEJ

December 8, 2008 8

December 4, 2008 at 10:00 a.m.

Case 3:07-cv-03304-MEJ Document 23 Filed 11/08/07 Page 12 of 14
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

N.

which contain a copy of each side's premarked exhibits for the Court. The

premarked exhibit binders are to be designated with label dividers.

The premarked exhibit binders will be given to the Courtroom Deputy on

the morning of the trial.

Jury Selection:

1. The Jury Commissioner will summon 20 to 25 prospective jurors. The

Courtroom Deputy will select their names at random and seat them in the

courtroom in the order in which their names are called.

Voir dire will be asked of sufficient venire persons that eight (or

more for a lengthy trial) will remain after all peremptory challenges and an

anticipated number of hardship dismissals and cause challenges have

been made.

The Court will then take cause challenges, and discuss hardship

claims from the individual jurors, at side bar. The Court will inform the

attorneys which hardship claims and cause challenges will be granted, but

will not announce those dismissals until the process is completed. Each

attorney may then list in writing up to three peremptory challenges. The

attorneys will review each other's lists and then submit them to the clerk.

Then, from the list of jurors in numerical order, the Court will strike

the persons with meritorious, hardships, those excused for cause, and

those challenged peremptorily. The Court will then call the first eight

people in numerical sequence remaining. These people will be the jury. All

jurors remaining at the close of the case will deliberate. There are no

alternates.

o. Sanctions:

Failure to comply with this Order is cause for sanctions under Federal

Rule of Civil Procedure 16{f).

JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT AND [PROPOSED] CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER 13

CASE NO. C07-03304 MEJ

Case 3:07-cv-03304-MEJ Document 23 Filed 11/08/07 Page 13 of 14
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12 DATED: November 7,2007

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22 DATED: _

23

24

25

26

27

28

P. Transcripts:

Counsel who wants to receive a daily transcript shall contact Robert

Stuart, Supervisor Court Reporting Services, at (415) 522-2079, at least

ten days in advance of the trial date. If any video or tape recording

equipment or demonstrative devices will be used, a signed order will need

to be obtained at least ten days in advance of the trial date for the items to

clear security.

Q. Questions:

All questions regarding these instructions should be directed to Brenda

Tolbert, Courtroom Deputy Clerk to Judge James, at (415) 522-4708.

LAW OFFICES OF SANFORD M. CIPINKO

By:

SANFORD M. CIPINKO

Attorneys for Plaintiff

DATED: November 7,2007

By:

RONALD P. FLYNN

Attorneys for Defendants

IT IS SO ORDERED.

By:

MARIA-ELENA JAMES

United States Magistrate Judge

JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT AND [PROPOSED] CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER 14

CASE NO. C07-03304 MEJ

November 8, 2007 The November 15 CMC is VACATED.

Case 3:07-cv-03304-MEJ Document 23 Filed 11/08/07 Page 14 of 14