Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_16-cv-00450/USCOURTS-caed-1_16-cv-00450-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Bakersfield Memorial Hospital
Defendant
Dignity Health
Defendant
Janice Green
Plaintiff
Leonard Green
Plaintiff

Document Text:

DOWNEY BRAND LLP

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1448200.1 1

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE MANDATORY SCHEDULING CONFERENCE; [PROPOSED] ORDER

DOWNEY BRAND LLP

ELIZABETH B. STALLARD (Bar No. 221445)

621 Capitol Mall, 18th Floor

Sacramento, CA 95814-4731

Telephone: 916.444.1000

Facsimile: 916.444.2100

estallard@downeybrand.com

Attorneys for Defendant

DIGNITY HEALTH

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LEONARD GREEN, an individual; 

JANICE GREEN, an individual; on their 

own behalf and on behalf of the general 

public,

Plaintiffs,

v.

BAKERSFIELD MEMORIAL 

HOSPITAL, a California Corporation; 

DIGNITY HEALTH, a California 

corporation; and DOES 1-10, inclusive,

Defendants.

Case No. 1:16-cv-00450-LJO-JLT

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE DATE OF 

MANDATORY SCHEDULING 

CONFERENCE; [PROPOSED] ORDER

(Doc. 6) 

TO THE COURT, ALL PARTIES AND THEIR COUNSEL OF RECORD HEREIN:

Plaintiffs LEONARD GREEN and JANICE GREEN (“Plaintiffs”), by and through their 

counsel, Christopher H. Knauf of Knauf Associates, and Defendant DIGNITY HEALTH 

(“Defendant”), by and through its counsel, Elizabeth B. Stallard of Downey Brand, LLP, stipulate 

and agree as follows:

This matter is currently scheduled for a Mandatory Scheduling Conference on June 27, 

2016, requiring that a Joint Status Report be filed no later than June 20, 2016. However, the 

parties are currently engaged in settlement negotiations and are hopeful that the matter can be 

Case 1:16-cv-00450-LJO-JLT Document 7 Filed 06/20/16 Page 1 of 2
DOWNEY BRAND LLP

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1448200.1 2

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE MANDATORY SCHEDULING CONFERENCE; [PROPOSED] ORDER

resolved soon and without further involvement from the Court. 

In an effort to preserve both the Court’s and the parties’ time and resources in the event 

the parties are able to resolve this matter, the parties stipulate to, and hereby request that the Court 

grant, a three week continuance of the Mandatory Scheduling Conference so that the parties can 

continue to pursue their efforts to resolve the matter.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

DATED: June 17, 2016 DOWNEY BRAND LLP

By: /s/ Elizabeth B. Stallard

ELIZABETH B. STALLARD

Attorney for Defendant

DIGNITY HEALTH

DATED: June 17, 2016 KNAUF ASSOCIATES

By: /s/ Christopher H. Knauf [as authorized 6/17/16]

LAURA N. DIAMOND

CHRISTOPHER H. KNAUF

Attorney for Plaintiffs

LEONARD GREEN AND JANICE GREEN

[PROPOSED] ORDER

In accordance with the foregoing stipulation, and good cause appearing, it is ordered that 

the Mandatory Scheduling Conference in this matter be continued to July 20, 2016, at 8:30 a.m.

The parties are advised that the Court will not again continue the scheduling conference. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 20, 2016 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:16-cv-00450-LJO-JLT Document 7 Filed 06/20/16 Page 2 of 2