Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-01534/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-01534-3/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Kathryn Hood
Plaintiff
Housing Authority of the County of Sacramento, Sacramento Housing and Redevelopment Agency
Defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KATHRYN HOOD, No. 2:06-cv-1534-MCE-EFB-PS

Plaintiff,

v. ORDER

HOUSING AUTHORITY OF

THE COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO,

SACRAMENTO HOUSING AND

REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY,

Defendant.

__________________________________/

On December 27, 2006, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein

which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings

and recommendations were to be filed within ten days. No objections were filed.

 Accordingly, the court presumes any findings of fact are correct. See Orland v. U.S., 602

F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1999). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. 

See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified Sch. Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983).

The court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and, good cause appearing,

concludes that it is appropriate to adopt the proposed Findings and Recommendations in full.

\\\\\

Case 2:06-cv-01534-MCE -EFB Document 9 Filed 02/20/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that:

1. The proposed Findings and Recommendations filed December 27, 2006, are

ADOPTED; and

2. This action is dismissed without prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); Local Rule 11-

110.

Dated: February 20, 2007

________________________________

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-01534-MCE -EFB Document 9 Filed 02/20/07 Page 2 of 2