Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-19-07704/USCOURTS-ca4-19-07704-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Anthony Leon Hoover
Appellant
Maury Correctional Institution
Appellee

Document Text:

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-7704

ANTHONY LEON HOOVER-EL,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

MAURY CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION,

 Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at 

Greensboro. Catherine C. Eagles, District Judge. (1:19-cv-00340-CCE-LPA)

Submitted: March 12, 2020 Decided: March 17, 2020

Before KING, KEENAN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Anthony Leon Hoover, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 19-7704 Doc: 6 Filed: 03/17/2020 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Anthony Leon Hoover seeks to appeal the district court’s order adopting the report 

and recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing Hoover’s 28 U.S.C. § 2241 

(2018) petition. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the notice of appeal 

was not timely filed.

In civil cases, parties have 30 days after the entry of the district court’s final 

judgment or order to note an appeal, Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court 

extends the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5) or reopens the appeal period under 

Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). “[T]he timely filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a 

jurisdictional requirement.” Bowles v. Russell, 551 U.S. 205, 214 (2007).

The district court entered its order on April 30, 2019. Hoover filed the notice of 

appeal on October 23, 2019.

∗

 Because Hoover failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to 

obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we dismiss the appeal. 

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

DISMISSED

 ∗ For purposes of this appeal, we assume that the date appearing on the notice of 

appeal is the earliest date Hoover could have delivered the notice to prison officials for 

mailing to the court. Fed. R. App. P. 4(c)(1); Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266, 276 (1988).

USCA4 Appeal: 19-7704 Doc: 6 Filed: 03/17/2020 Pg: 2 of 2