Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_19-cv-01622/USCOURTS-caed-2_19-cv-01622-3/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Kings County Housing
Defendant
Madiha Miner
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

MADIHA MINER, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

KINGS COUNTY HOUSING, 

Defendant. 

No. 2:19-cv-01622-KJM-CKD PS 

ORDER 

 On November 14, 2019, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations (ECF 

No. 8), which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the 

findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen (14) days. No objections were 

filed. 

 The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 

602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed 

de novo. See Robbins v. Carey, 481 F.3d 1143, 1147 (9th Cir. 2007) (“[D]eterminations of law 

by the magistrate judge are reviewed de novo by both the district court and [the appellate] court 

. . . .”). Having reviewed the file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be 

supported by the record and by the proper analysis. 

///// 

///// 

Case 2:19-cv-01622-KJM-CKD Document 9 Filed 01/09/20 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2 

 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 

 1. The findings and recommendations (ECF No. 8) are ADOPTED. 

 2. This action is dismissed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). 

 3. The Clerk of Court shall close this case. 

DATED: January 8, 2020. 

Case 2:19-cv-01622-KJM-CKD Document 9 Filed 01/09/20 Page 2 of 2