Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-07-01969/USCOURTS-ca4-07-01969-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
David Caron
Appellee
John C. Davies
Appellee
Stephan M. Farley
Appellee
Gary M. Jebsen
Appellee
James H. King
Appellee
Aleksandr J. Stoyanov
Appellant
Yuri J. Stoyanov
Appellant
Donald C. Winter
Appellee

Document Text:

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-1969

ALEKSANDR J. STOYANOV; YURI J. STOYANOV,

Plaintiffs - Appellants,

v.

DONALD C. WINTER, Secretary of the Navy; GARY M. JEBSEN,

Individually and in his Official Capacity as Head of Code 70,

Carderock Division Naval Surface Warfare Center; JAMES H.

KING, Individually and in his Official Capacity as the Head of

Code 74, Carderock Division Naval Surface Warfare Center; JOHN

C. DAVIES, Individually and in his Official Capacity as the

Deputy Head of Code 74, Carderock Division Naval Surface

Warfare Center; STEPHAN M. FARLEY, Individually and in his

Official Capacity as the Head of Code 741, Carderock Division

Naval Surface Warfare Center; DAVID CARON, Individually and in

his Official Capacity as Assistant Counsel Code 39, Carderock

Division Naval Surface Warfare Center,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge.

(1:05-cv-01567-RDB)

Submitted: February 21, 2008 Decided: February 25, 2008

Before MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Appeal: 07-1969 Doc: 18 Filed: 02/25/2008 Pg: 1 of 3
- 2 -

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Aleksandr J. Stoyanov, Yuri J. Stoyanov, Appellants Pro Se. John

Walter Sippel, Jr., OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY,

Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 07-1969 Doc: 18 Filed: 02/25/2008 Pg: 2 of 3
- 3 -

PER CURIAM:

Aleksandr J. Stoyanov and Yuri J. Stoyanov appeal the

district court’s orders dismissing their claims under Title VII of

the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to

2000e-17 (2000), the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967,

as amended, 29 U.S.C. §§ 621 to 634 (2000), and the Whistleblower

Protection Act, 5 U.S.C. § 2302 (2000). We have reviewed the

record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for

the reasons stated by the district court. See Stoyanov v. Winter,

No. 1:05-cv-01567-RDB (D. Md. July 25, 2006; Aug. 15, 2007). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Appeal: 07-1969 Doc: 18 Filed: 02/25/2008 Pg: 3 of 3