Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-00985/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-00985-5/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Orion S. Ehringer
Plaintiff
State of California
Defendant

Document Text:

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

ORION S. EHRINGER, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

STATE OF CALIFORNIA, 

Defendant. 

No. 2:15-cv-0985 KJM AC P 

ORDER 

 Plaintiff, a former county jail inmate now in Metropolitan State Hospital in 

Norwalk, California, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The 

matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as provided by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) 

and Local Rule 302. 

 On March 1, 2016, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, 

which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the 

findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has not filed 

objections to the findings and recommendations. 

 The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United 

States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are 

reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 

///// 

Case 2:15-cv-00985-KJM-AC Document 26 Filed 03/29/16 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2

1983). Having reviewed the file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be 

supported by the record and by the proper analysis.1 

 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 

 1. The findings and recommendations filed March 1, 2016, are adopted in full; 

and 

 2. Plaintiff’s motion for release (ECF No. 5) is denied. 

DATED: March 29, 2016 

 

1

 The court construes the complete sentence on page 9, line 20, as a reiteration of the 

recommendation that petitioner’s motion for release be denied rather than as a ruling on the 

motion. 

Case 2:15-cv-00985-KJM-AC Document 26 Filed 03/29/16 Page 2 of 2