Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_16-cv-02100/USCOURTS-caed-2_16-cv-02100-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Kaiser Foundation Hospitals
Defendant
Amanda Rutherford
Plaintiff

Document Text:

THIRD STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO FIRST AMENDED 

COMPLAINT/CASE NO. 2:16-cv-02100-MCE-AC 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

SEYFARTH SHAW LLP 

Kristina M. Launey (SBN 221335) 

klauney@seyfarth.com 

400 Capitol Mall, Suite 2350 

Sacramento, CA 95814-4428 

Telephone: (916) 448-0159 

Facsimile: (916) 558-4839 

Christian J. Rowley (SBN 187293) 

crowley@seyfarth.com 

560 Mission Street, 31st Floor 

San Francisco, California 94105 

Telephone: (415) 397-2823 

Facsimile: (415) 397-8549 

Attorneys for Defendant 

KAISER FOUNDATION HOSPITALS 

CENTER FOR DISABILITY ACCESS

Mark Potter (SBN 166317) 

mark@potterhandy.com

9845 Erma Road, Suite 300 

San Diego, CA 92131 

Telephone: (858) 375-7385 

Facsimile: (888) 422-5191 

Michelle Uzeta (SBN 164402) 

michelleu@potterhandy.com

710 S. Myrtle Street, Suite 306 

Monrovia, CA 91016 

Telephone: (858) 375-7385 

Facsimile: (888) 422-5191 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

AMANDA RUTHERFORD 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

AMANDA RUTHERFORD, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

KAISER FOUNDATION HOSPITALS and 

DOES 1-10, Inclusive, 

Defendants. 

Case No. 2:16-cv-02100-MCE-AC

THIRD STIPULATION AND ORDER 

EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO 

COMPLAINT 

[L.R. 144] 

Complaint Served: 9/8/16 

Current Response Date: 11/21/16 

New Response Date: 12/8/16 

Trial Date: None Set 

District Judge: Morrison C. England, Jr. 

Pursuant to the provisions of Local Rule 144, plaintiff Amanda Rutherford (“Plaintiff”) and 

defendant Kaiser Foundation Hospitals (“Kaiser”), by and through their respective counsel, hereby 

stipulate that Kaiser may have a 21-day extension of time in which to respond to plaintiff's 

Complaint. This is the third extension of time to respond to the Complaint. Pursuant to this 

extension, a response by Kaiser shall be due on or before December 8, 2016. This stipulation and 

extension will not affect or alter any deadline previously set by Court order. 

Case 2:16-cv-02100-MCE-AC Document 10 Filed 11/28/16 Page 1 of 2
2 

THIRD STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO FIRST AMENDED 

COMPLAINT/CASE NO. 2:16-cv-02100-MCE-AC 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

The reason for the extension is to allow further time for the parties to assess whether this 

matter can be resolved without further litigation. 

Pursuant to Local Rule 131(e), counsel for Plaintiff has authorized submission of this 

document on her behalf. 

DATED: November 16, 2016 Respectfully submitted, 

SEYFARTH SHAW LLP 

By: /s/ Kristina M. Launey 

Kristina M. Launey 

Attorneys for Defendant 

KAISER FOUNDATION HOSPITALS

DATED: November 16, 2016 Respectfully submitted, 

CENTER FOR DISABILITY ACCESS 

By: /s/ Michelle Uzeta 

Michelle Uzeta 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

AMANDA RUTHERFORD 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: November 26, 2016 

Case 2:16-cv-02100-MCE-AC Document 10 Filed 11/28/16 Page 2 of 2