Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_20-cv-00341/USCOURTS-caed-2_20-cv-00341-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Warren Spies
Plaintiff
Van Ru Credit Corporation
Defendant

Document Text:

1

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT 

CASE NO. 2:20-cv-00341-TLN-CKD 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

June D. Coleman (SBN 191890) 

MESSER STRICKLER, LTD. 

5960 South land Park Drive #1059 

Sacramento, CA 95822 

(916) 502-1768 (direct) 

((312) 334-3473 (fax) 

jcoleman@messerstrickler.com

Attorney for Defendant 

VAN RU CREDIT CORPORATION 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

WARREN SPIES, 

 Plaintiff, 

 vs. 

VAN RU CREDIT CORPORATION, 

 Defendants. 

)

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

CASE NO. 2:20-cv-00341-TLN-CKD 

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR 

EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO 

PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT

The parties had previously agreed to a 28-day extension to respond to the 

Complaint, which was served on February 24. Based on this agreement, the 

response would then be due on April 13, 2020. Defendant, Van Ru Credit 

Corporation, through its undersigned counsel, needs additional time to prepare a 

response because Van Ru Credit Corporation is no longer operational, its records 

are archived in Chicago, IL, the records can only be accessed by going into the office 

in Chicago, and Illinois is currently under a stay at home order due to the COVID 

19 pandemic. Given the projections regarding the course of COVID 19 in the United 

Case 2:20-cv-00341-TLN-CKD Document 7 Filed 04/08/20 Page 1 of 2
2

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT 

CASE NO. 2:20-cv-00341-TLN-CKD 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

States, Defendant hopes that it will be able to access its records and respond to the 

Complaint by mid-July. Based on this, the parties have agreed to extend the time 

to respond by an additional 90 days to July 13. 

Given this Stipulation, signed by the counsel for the parties, the parties 

respectfully request that this Court permit Defendant to respond to the Complaint 

by July 13, 2020, in accordance with Local Rules 143 and 230(f) of the Eastern 

District of California. 

DATED: April 8, 2020 MESSER STRICKLER, LTD. 

 By: /s/ June D. Coleman 

 June D. Coleman 

 Attorney for Defendant 

VAN RU CREDIT CORPORATION 

 

DATED: April 8, 2020 KIMMEL & SILVERMAN, P.C. 

 By: /s/ Joseph C. Hoeffel 

 Joseph C. Hoeffel 

 Attorney for Plaintiff 

WARREN SPIES 

 

IT IS SO ORDERED 

DATED: April 8, 2020 

Case 2:20-cv-00341-TLN-CKD Document 7 Filed 04/08/20 Page 2 of 2