Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-07-02065/USCOURTS-ca4-07-02065-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Caron Cross
Appellee
Jack S. Holmes
Appellee
Theodore Justice
Appellant
Buck Lattimore
Appellee
Kristen McRay
Appellee
Art Pope
Appellee
Dawn Steadman
Appellee
Tracy Weaver
Appellee
Nancy Wells
Appellee

Document Text:

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-2065

THEODORE JUSTICE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

ART POPE, in his individual and official

capacity; JACK S. HOLMES, in his individual

and official capacity; NANCY WELLS, in her

individual and official capacity; CARON CROSS,

in her individual and official capacity; DAWN

STEADMAN, in her individual and official

capacity; KRISTEN MCRAY, in her individual and

official capacity; BUCK LATTIMORE, in his

individual and official capacity; TRACY

WEAVER, in her individual and official

capacity, and others sued in their individual

and official capacities,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of North Carolina, at New Bern. Louise W. Flanagan, Chief

District Judge. (5:07-cv-00251-FL)

Submitted: January 24, 2008 Decided: February 12, 2008

Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Theodore Justice, Appellant Pro Se.

Appeal: 07-2065 Doc: 9 Filed: 02/12/2008 Pg: 1 of 3
- 2 -

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 07-2065 Doc: 9 Filed: 02/12/2008 Pg: 2 of 3
- 3 -

PER CURIAM:

Theodore Justice appeals the district court’s order

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing

his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C.

§ 1915(e)(2)(B). We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by

the district court. Justice v. Pope, No. 5:07-cv-00251-FL

(E.D.N.C. July 2, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Appeal: 07-2065 Doc: 9 Filed: 02/12/2008 Pg: 3 of 3