Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-03177/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-03177-3/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Research In Motion Corporation
Counter-claimant
Research in Motion Limited
Counter-claimant
Visto Corporation
Counter-claimant

Document Text:

MANATT, PHELPS &

PHILLIPS, LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

PALO ALTO

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

MANATT, PHELPS & PHILLIPS, LLP 

ROBERT D. BECKER (Bar No. CA 160648) 

E-mail: rbecker@manatt.com

EUGENE L. HAHM (Bar No. CA 167596) 

E-mail : ehahm@manatt.com

SHAWN G. HANSEN (Bar No. CA 197033) 

E-mail: shansen@manatt.com

1001 Page Mill Road, Building 2 

Palo Alto, CA 94304-1006 

Telephone: (650) 812-1300 

Facsimile: (650) 213-0260 

Attorneys for Defendant

and Counterclaimant 

VISTO CORPORATION 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

RESEARCH IN MOTION LIMITED, 

Plaintiff, 

vs.

VISTO CORPORATION, 

Defendant.

Case No. C-07- 3177 (MMC) 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

MODIFYING COURT DEADLINES UNDER 

PATENT RULES 4-2, 4-3 AND 4-4 

VISTO CORPORATION, 

Counterclaimant, 

vs.

RESEARCH IN MOTION LIMITED, and 

RESEARCH IN MOTION 

CORPORATION, 

Counterdefendants.

Case 3:07-cv-03177-MMC Document 27 Filed 01/10/08 Page 1 of 4
MANATT, PHELPS &

PHILLIPS, LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

PALO ALTO

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 2 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

MODIFYING PATENT RULE 4-2, PATENT RULE 4-3, 

AND PATENT RULE 4-4 SCHEDULE 

Visto Corporation and Research In Motion Limited and Research In Motion Corporation, 

through their respective counsel, stipulate as follows: 

1. On October 1, 2007, the parties filed a CASE MANAGEMENT AND DOCKET 

CONTROL ORDER (Docket No. 21) (“Case Management Order”); 

2. On October 9, 2007, the Court issued an order adopting with certain exceptions the 

Case Management Order (Docket No. 22); 

3. The Exchange of Preliminary Claim Constructions under Patent L.R. 4-2 is 

currently scheduled for January 10, 2008; and 

4. The filing of the Joint Claim Construction and Prehearing Statement under Patent 

L.R. 4-3 is currently scheduled for February 11, 2008;

5. The date for the completion of Claim Construction Discovery under Patent L.R. 

4-4 is currently scheduled for March 12, 2008; and 

6. The Parties currently are in the process of meeting and conferring on the terms to 

be construed and believe that additional time is necessary to complete the meet and 

confer process. 

In order to complete a meaningful meet and confer on the terms to be construed, the 

parties hereby agree, subject to approval by the Court, to the following modifications to the Case 

Management Order: 

1. The date of the Exchange of Preliminary Claim Constructions under Patent L.R. 

4-2 shall be extended from January 10, 2008 to January 24, 2008;

2. The date for filing the Joint Claim Construction and Prehearing Statement under 

Patent L.R. 4-3 shall be extended from February 11, 2008 to February 25, 2008;

3. The date for the completion of Claim Construction Discovery under Patent L.R. 

4-4 shall be extended from March 12, 2008 to March 26, 2008;

4. This stipulation is limited to compliance with Patent L.R. 4-2, Patent L.R. 4-3 and 

Patent L.R. 4-4 and does not relate to any other phase of this case; and 

5. No other deadlines under the Case Management Order are affected by this 

Case 3:07-cv-03177-MMC Document 27 Filed 01/10/08 Page 2 of 4
MANATT, PHELPS &

PHILLIPS, LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

PALO ALTO

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 3 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

MODIFYING PATENT RULE 4-2, PATENT RULE 4-3, 

AND PATENT RULE 4-4 SCHEDULE 

stipulation.

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

DATED: January 9, 2008 MANATT, PHELPS & PHILLIPS, LLP 

By: /s/ Eugene L. Hahm . 

 Eugene L. Hahm 

Attorneys for Defendant and 

Counterclaimant

VISTO CORPORATION 

DATED: January 9, 2008 KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP 

By: /s/ Philip T. Chen 

 Philip T. Chen 

Attorneys for Plaintiff and 

Counterdefendants

RESEARCH IN MOTION LIMITED, and 

RESEARCH IN MOTION CORPORATION 

Filer’s Attestation: Pursuant to General Order No. 45, Section X(B) regarding signatures, 

Eugene Hahm hereby attests that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained.

Case 3:07-cv-03177-MMC Document 27 Filed 01/10/08 Page 3 of 4
MANATT, PHELPS &

PHILLIPS, LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

PALO ALTO

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Good cause appearing, the parties’ stipulation is hereby GRANTED. The deadlines for 

compliance with Patent L.R. 4-2 - 4-4 as set forth in the stipulation are modified as follows: 

Exchange of Preliminary Claim Constructions 

under Patent L.R. 4-2 

January 24, 2008 

Joint Claim Construction and Prehearing 

Statement under Patent L.R. 4-3 

February 25, 2008 

Completion of Claim Construction Discovery 

under Patent L.R. 4-4 

March 26, 2008 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED this _____ day of January, 2008 

_______________________________

HON. MAXINE M. CHESNEY 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

20194826.1

10th

Case 3:07-cv-03177-MMC Document 27 Filed 01/10/08 Page 4 of 4