Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-00514/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-00514-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Buth-Na-Bodhaige, Inc.
Defendant
Aimee Lambert
Plaintiff
Raze Media, LLC
Defendant

Document Text:

DRINKER BIDDLE &

REATH LLP

ATTORNEYS AT L A W

S AN FRANCISCO

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

FURTHER STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR 

DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

CASE NO. 2:14-CV-00514-MCE-KJN

MICHAEL J. STORTZ (SBN #139386)

michael.stortz@dbr.com

MATTHEW J. ADLER (SBN #273147)

matthew.adler@dbr.com

DRINKER BIDDLE & REATH LLP

50 Fremont Street, 20th Floor

San Francisco, CA 94105-2235

Telephone: (415) 591-7500

Facsimile: (415) 591-7510

Attorneys for Defendant

BUTH-NA-BODHAIGE, INC. d/b/a

THE BODY SHOP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

AIMEE LAMBERT, an individual, on 

behalf of herself and all others similarly 

situated,

Plaintiff,

v.

BUTH-NA-BODHAIGE, INC., a 

Delaware corporation; RAZE MEDIA, 

LLC, a Texas limited liability company; 

and DOES 1 – 50, inclusive,

Defendants.

Case No. 2:14-cv-00514-MCE-KJN

FURTHER STIPULATION TO EXTEND 

TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND 

TO COMPLAINT

Case 2:14-cv-00514-MCE-KJN Document 9 Filed 05/14/14 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 1 -

WHEREAS, Plaintiff Aimee Lambert (“Plaintiff”) filed the Complaint on February 20, 

2014;

WHEREAS, the current responsive pleading deadlines for Defendants Raze Media, LLC 

and Buth-Na-Bodhaige, Inc. are May 9, 2014 and May 12, 2014, respectively, pursuant to a prior 

stipulation of the parties to extend Defendants’ responsive pleading deadlines by 28 days (D.E. 

7);

WHEREAS, Defendants have reviewed Plaintiff’s allegations but require additional time 

to complete their factual investigations and prepare their responses to the Complaint;

WHEREAS, pursuant to Local Rule 144(a), the parties may stipulate, subject to Court 

approval, to an additional extension of the time to respond to the Complaint;

WHEREAS, a further extension will not impact any other deadlines in this action; and

WHEREAS, the parties through counsel have met and conferred and reached agreement to 

continue Defendants’ current responsive pleading deadlines by approximately three more weeks.

THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by the parties through their respective 

counsel, subject to Court approval, as follows:

1. The deadline for Defendant Raze Media, LLC to respond to the Complaint is 

continued to and including May 30, 2014.

2. The deadline for Defendant Buth-Na-Bodhaige, Inc. to respond to the Complaint is 

continued to and including May 30, 2014.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Case 2:14-cv-00514-MCE-KJN Document 9 Filed 05/14/14 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

Dated: May 6, 2014 DRINKER BIDDLE & REATH LLP

By:

Michael J. Stortz

Matthew J. Adler

Attorneys for Defendant

BUTH-NA-BODHAIGE, INC. d/b/a

THE BODY SHOP

Dated: May 6, 2014 FINNERTY LAW OFFICES, INC.

By:

Kathleen E. Finnerty

Attorneys for Defendant

RAZE MEDIA, LLC

Dated: May _____, 2014 HORNBERGER LAW CORPORATION

By:

Nicholas W. Hornberger

Nathan Verbiscar-Brown

Attorneys for Plaintiff

AIMEE LAMBERT

ORDER

Pursuant to the above Stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 13, 2014

Case 2:14-cv-00514-MCE-KJN Document 9 Filed 05/14/14 Page 3 of 3