Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_06-cr-00637/USCOURTS-cand-4_06-cr-00637-6/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Gary Wayne Ross
Defendant
USA
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

OAKLAND DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

GARY WAYNE ROSS,

Defendant. 

Case No. 06-00637 SBA

ORDER

[Docket Nos.74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82]

On July 8, 2008, the Court held a pretrial hearing in this matter. For the reasons stated on the

record during the hearing, the Court hereby ORDERS as follows: (1) the Government's motion in

limine to preclude defendant from offering expert testimony [Docket No. 74] is DENIED without

prejudice as to Dr. Werboff and Mr. Vilfer; a hearing on the motion as to Dr. Herriot is set for July

14, 2008 at 10:00 a.m.; (2) the Government's motion in limine to preclude defendant from offering

defendant's out of court statements through other witnesses [Docket No. 75] is DENIED without

prejudice; (3) the Government's motion in limine to admit evidence of flight [Docket No. 76] is

DENIED without prejudice; (4) the Government's motion in limine to admit inextricably intertwined

pornographic evidence and notice of potential F.R.E. 404(b) evidence [Docket No. 77] is DENIED

without prejudice; (5) the Government's unopposed motion in limine precluding improper reference

to potential punishment, precluding unsupported argument, and requiring reciprocal discovery

[Docket No. 78] is GRANTED; (6) the Government's motion in limine to deny defendant's request

for jury instruction on entrapment and to preclude argument or comments suggesting that defendant

was entrapped [Docket No. 79] is DENIED without prejudice; (7) the Defendant's motion in limine

to exclude sexual images [Docket No. 80] is GRANTED; (8) the Defendant's motion in limine to

exclude evidence of internet perusal of erotic reading material [Docket No. 81] is DENIED without

prejudice; and (9) the Defendant's motion in limine to exclude all versions of chat text [Docket No.

82] is DENIED without prejudice.

Case 4:06-cr-00637-SBA Document 95 Filed 07/11/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 2

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated 7/11/08 _________________________________

Saundra Brown Armstrong 

United States District Judge

Case 4:06-cr-00637-SBA Document 95 Filed 07/11/08 Page 2 of 2