Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-00624/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-00624-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Houchin Cotton Company, LLC
Defendant
Maersk Line
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1 NOTICE OF DISMISSAL 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Stephen M. Uthoff, State Bar No. 145206 

E-mail: suthoff@uthofflaw.com

The Uthoff Law Corporation 

401 E. Ocean Blvd., Suite 710 

Long Beach, California 90802 

Tele: 562-437-4301 

Fax: 562-437-4341 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

MAERSK LINE 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

MAERSK LINE 

 Plaintiff, 

vs. 

HOUCHIN COTTON COMPANY, LLC 

 Defendants. 

_________________________________

_ 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Case No. 07 CV 00624 OWW-NEW 

IN ADMIRALTY 

NOTICE OF DISMISSAL; ORDER 

THEREON 

 

/// 

/// 

/// 

/// 

/// 

/// 

/// 

/// 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 1:07-cv-00624-OWW -LJO Document 9 Filed 06/27/07 Page 1 of 3
2 NOTICE OF DISMISSAL 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

The above-entitled action is hereby dismissed without prejudice by plaintiff pursuant 

to Rule 41(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 

Dated: June 25, 2007 

 By: /s/ Stephen M. Uthoff

 Stephen M. Uthoff 

 The Uthoff Law Corporation 

 Attorneys for Plaintiff 

 MAERSK LINE 

IT IS SO ORDERED: 

Dated: June 26, 2007 __/s/ Oliver W. Wanger______ 

 Hon. Oliver W. Wagner 

 United States District Judge 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 1:07-cv-00624-OWW -LJO Document 9 Filed 06/27/07 Page 2 of 3
3 NOTICE OF DISMISSAL 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

PROOF OF SERVICE 

STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) 

 ) ss. 

COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) 

I am employed in the County of Los Angeles, State of California. I am over the age 

of 18 and not a party to the within action; my business address is 401 E. Ocean Blvd., 

Suite 710, Long Beach, California 90802. 

On June 25 ,2007, I served the foregoing document described as NOTICE OF 

DISMISSAL [PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON on the interested parties in this 

action by placing a copy thereof enclosed in a sealed envelope addressed as follows: 

Houchin Cotton Company, LLC 

31968 Phillips Rd 

Bakersfield, CA 93250 

 

 [X] BY MAIL: I caused such envelope to be deposited in the mail at Long Beach, 

California. The envelope was mailed with postage thereon fully prepaid. I am readily 

familiar with this firm’s practice of collection and processing correspondence for mailing. 

Under that practice it would be deposited with U.S. postal service on the same day with 

postage thereon fully prepaid at Long Beach, California in the ordinary course of 

business. I am aware that on motion of the party served, service is presumed invalid if 

postal cancellation date or postage meter date is more than one day after date of deposit 

for mailing in affidavit. 

[ ] BY FACSIMILE: I served a true copy of the document(s) described on all parties to 

this action by facsimile transmission, and the transmission was reported as complete and 

without error. A copy of the transmission report properly issued by the transmitting 

facsimile machine is attached hereto and shows the date, time and telephone number of 

the transmitting facsimile machine. Facsimile transmissions were sent and addressed as 

stated above: 

[X] Federal: I declare that I am employed in the office of a member of the bar of this 

court at whose direction the service was made. 

Executed on June 25, 2007 at Long Beach, California. 

 /s/ Stephen M. Uthoff

 Stephen M. Uthoff 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 1:07-cv-00624-OWW -LJO Document 9 Filed 06/27/07 Page 3 of 3