Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_15-cv-00724/USCOURTS-caed-1_15-cv-00724-4/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Chris Jonathan Epperson
Plaintiff
Oracle Corporation
Defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CHRIS JONATHAN EPPERSON,

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

ORACLE CORPORATION,

 Defendants.

1:15-cv-00724 LJO BAM

ORDER RE DECEMBER 23, 2016 

FILING (Doc. 26).

On December 23, 2016, the Court received a one-page filling from Plaintiff that lists the abovecaptioned case, among others. It is not clear what Plaintiff is requesting of the Court in relation to this 

case, which has been closed for more than a year. The document lists several phrases that appear to 

invoke legal concepts and/or legal citations. As the Court has no jurisdiction to act on this request, 

which does not pertain to any pending cause of action and is not framed by any Federal Rule of Civil 

Procedure, the filing will be disregarded. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate the open motion 

triggered by the filing of Document 26. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 6, 2017 /s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill _____ 

UNITED STATES CHIEF DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:15-cv-00724-LJO-BAM Document 27 Filed 01/06/17 Page 1 of 1