Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-almd-2_14-cv-01138/USCOURTS-almd-2_14-cv-01138-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Chilton County 9-1-1 District
Defendant
Mildred E. Johnson
Plaintiff

Document Text:

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION 

MILDRED E. JOHNSON, )

)

 Plaintiff, )

) CIVIL ACTION NO.

 v. ) 2:14cv1138-MHT

) (WO) 

CHILTON COUNTY 9-1-1 

DISTRICT, 

)

) 

) 

 Defendant. )

ORDER 

 Pending before the court is the parties’ second 

joint motion for extension of time. They base this 

motion on the incorrect statement that the court failed 

to reset the dispositive-motions deadline when it 

entered an order (doc. no. 16) granting the parties’ 

first motion for extension of time. The parties 

clearly failed to read carefully that order, in which 

the court modified the uniform scheduling order by 

resetting the pretrial and trial dates, and all dates 

Case 2:14-cv-01138-MHT-TFM Document 18 Filed 10/09/15 Page 1 of 2
expressly tied to those dates. They also apparently 

did not carefully read the uniform scheduling order. 

* * * 

 Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the motion (doc. 

no. 17) is denied to the extent that it asks to 

continue the pretrial and trial dates, but is granted 

to the extent that the deadline for dispositive motions 

is reset from September 10, 2015, to October 12, 2015. 

DONE, this the 9th day of October, 2015. 

 /s/ Myron H. Thompson____ 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 2:14-cv-01138-MHT-TFM Document 18 Filed 10/09/15 Page 2 of 2