Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-00385/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-00385-3/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Babatov Khadzhimurad
Plaintiff
Sacramento County
Defendant
Sacramento County Sheriff Department
Defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BABATOV KHADZHIMURAD,

Plaintiff,

v.

SACRAMENTO COUNTY SHERIFF 

DEPARTMENT, et al.,

Defendants.

No. 2:14-cv-0385 JAM KJN P

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

By an order filed November 4, 2014, this court ordered plaintiff to complete and return to 

the court, within thirty days, the USM-285 forms necessary to effect service on defendants. That 

thirty day period has since passed, and plaintiff has not responded in any way to the court’s order.

IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See

Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations will be submitted to the United States District Judge 

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 

after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections 

with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Findings and 

Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time 

////

////

Case 2:14-cv-00385-JAM-KJN Document 17 Filed 01/06/15 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th 

Cir. 1991).

Dated: January 6, 2015

/khad0385.fusm

Case 2:14-cv-00385-JAM-KJN Document 17 Filed 01/06/15 Page 2 of 2