Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-03568/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-03568-4/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Wesley A. Van Winkle
Defendant
Richard John Vieira
Plaintiff

Document Text:

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RICHARD JOHN VIEIRA,

Plaintiff,

v.

WESLEY A. VAN WINKLE,

Defendant. /

No. C 14-3568 SI (pr)

ORDER 

Plaintiff has filed a motion to transfer the certified record in this case to the Ninth Circuit

and to serve a copy thereof on the parties. The motion is DENIED. (Docket # 18.) When, as

here, the plaintiff is unrepresented by counsel, he "need not file the initial excerpts, supplemental

excerpts or further excerpts of record" for his appeal in the Ninth Circuit. Ninth Circuit Rule 30-

1.2; see also United States Court of Appeals For the Ninth Circuit handout entitled "After

Opening a Case - Pro Se Appellants (revised January 2015)" at 6 ("You are not required to

designate written pleadings or orders that were filed in the originating court" in non-bankruptcy

appeals). There is no transcript to be ordered because there were no reported proceedings in this

action.

 IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 13, 2015 _______________________

 SUSAN ILLSTON

United States District Judge

Case 3:14-cv-03568-SI Document 19 Filed 01/13/15 Page 1 of 1