Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-04793/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-04793-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Susan Bartholomew
Plaintiff
British Airways, PLC
Defendant
United Air Lines, Inc.
Defendant
Virgin Atlantic Airways Limited
Defendant

Document Text:

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

MAYER, BROWN, ROWE & MAW LLP 

EDWARD D. JOHNSON (SBN 189475) 

SHIRISH GUPTA (SBN 205584) 

Two Palo Alto Square, Suite 300 

3000 El Camino Real 

Palo Alto, CA 94306 

Telephone: (650) 331-2000 

Facsimile: (650) 331-4537 

wjohnson@mayerbrownrowe.com

sgupta@mayerbrownrowe.com

MAYER, BROWN, ROWE & MAW LLP 

RICHARD J. FAVRETTO 

1909 K Street, N.W. 

Washington, D.C. 20006 

Telephone: (202) 263-3000 

Facsimile: (202) 263-3300 

rfavretto@mayerbrownrowe.com

Attorneys for Defendants 

UNITED AIR LINES, INC. 

Additional Counsel Appear on Signature Page 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SUSAN BARTHOLOMEW, 

on behalf of herself and all others 

similarly situated, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

BRITISH AIRWAYS, PLC, VIRGIN 

ATLANTIC AIRWAYS LIMITED, and 

UNITED AIR LINES, INC., 

Defendants. 

CASE NO. CV 06-04793-SC 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER PURSUANT TO LOCAL 

RULE 6-1 TO EXTEND TIME TO 

RESPOND TO COMPLAINT 

Pursuant to Local Rule 6-1, in light of the transfer motion now pending before 

the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (“JPML”) captioned In re International 

Air Transportation Surcharge Antitrust Litigation, MDL Docket No. 1793, Plaintiff 

 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 6-1 

TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT – CV 06-04793-SC 

Case 3:06-cv-04793-CRB Document 7 Filed 08/21/06 Page 1 of 6
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Susan Bartholomew (“Plaintiff”) and Defendants British Airways Plc, Virgin 

Atlantic Airways Limited, and United Air Lines, Inc. (collectively, the 

“Defendants”), through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate and agree as 

follows: 

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED that Defendants’ time to 

answer, move or otherwise plead is enlarged until the later of (1) the date when the 

Defendants would otherwise be required to file a response pursuant to Federal Rule 

of Civil Procedure 12, or (2) 45 days after the JPML rules on the pending motion 

and consolidates each related action in a single court, and a consolidated complaint 

is filed by all plaintiffs in the single transferee Court and served on Defendants. 

IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that each defense counsel 

designated below shall accept service on behalf of the Defendant represented by 

each such counsel of all complaints in the above-captioned matter, including any 

amended or consolidated complaints, and further, that such Defendant shall not 

contest sufficiency of process or service of process. This Stipulation does not 

constitute a waiver of any other defense including, but not limited to, the defenses of 

lack of personal or subject matter jurisdiction or improper venue. Nothing in this 

paragraph shall obligate any Defendant to answer, move or otherwise respond to any 

complaint until the time provided in the preceding paragraph. The above 

notwithstanding, should any Defendant, except pursuant to court order, respond to 

any complaint in a related matter filed in another United States District Court prior 

to the date contemplated by this stipulation, then such Defendant shall make a 

simultaneous response to the complaint in the above-captioned matter. 

Respectfully submitted, 

-2- 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 6-1 

TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT – CV 06-04793-SC 

Case 3:06-cv-04793-CRB Document 7 Filed 08/21/06 Page 2 of 6
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Dated: August 15, 2006 

Dated: August 15, 2006 

Dated: August 15, 2006 

GREEN WELLING LLP 

/s/ ______ Robert S. Green (SBN 136183) 

Jenelle Welling (SBN 209480) 

GREEN WELLING LLP 

595 Market Street, Suite 2750 

San Francisco, CA 94105 

T: (415) 477-6700 

F: (415) 477-6710 

Attorneys for Plaintiff Susan Bartholomew 

MAYER, BROWN, ROWE & MAW LLP 

/s/ ______ Edward D. Johnson (SBN 189475) 

MAYER, BROWN, ROWE & MAW LLP 

Two Palo Alto Square, Suite 300 

3000 El Camino Real 

Palo Alto, CA 94306 

T: (650) 331-2000 

F: (650) 331-4537 

Richard J. Favretto 

MAYER, BROWN, ROWE & MAW LLP 

1909 K Street, NW 

Washington, DC 20006 

Attorneys for Defendant United Air Lines, Inc.

SULLIVAN & CROMWELL LLP 

/s/ 

Brendan P. Cullen (SBN 194057) 

SULLIVAN & CROMWELL LLP 

1870 Embarcadero Road 

Palo Alto, CA 94303 

T: (650) 461-5600 

F: (650) 461-5700 

Daryl A. Libow 

SULLIVAN & CROMWELL LLP 

1701 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW 

Washington, DC 20006 

Attorneys for Defendant British Airways Plc 

-3- 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 6-1 

TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT – CV 06-04793-SC 

Case 3:06-cv-04793-CRB Document 7 Filed 08/21/06 Page 3 of 6
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Dated: August 15, 2006 SIMPSON THACHER & BARTLETT LLP 

/s/ 

Harrison J. Frahn (SBN 206822) 

SIMPSON THACHER & BARTLETT LLP 

2550 Hanover Street 

Palo Alto, CA 94304 

T: (650) 251-5000 

F: (650) 251-5002 

Charles E. Koob (SBN 47349) 

SIMPSON THACHER & BARTLETT LLP 

425 Lexington Avenue 

New York, NY 10017 

Attorneys for Defendant Virgin Atlantic Airways Limited

Filer’s Attestation: Pursuant to General Order No. 45, Section X(B), Shirish Gupta 

hereby attests that the signatories’ concurrences in the filing of this document have been obtained. 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, 

IT IS SO ORDERED: 

Date: 

 

Honorable Judge Samuel Conti 

-4- 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 6-1 

TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT – CV 06-04793-SC 

8/21/06

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Samuel Conti

Case 3:06-cv-04793-CRB Document 7 Filed 08/21/06 Page 4 of 6
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

PROOF OF SERVICE

I am employed in Santa Clara County, California. I am over the age of 

eighteen years and not a party to the within-entitled action. My business address is 

Two Palo Alto Square, Suite 300, Palo Alto, California 94306-2112. 

On August 15, 2006, I served the foregoing document(s) described as

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 

6-1 TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT 

on each interested party, as follows: 

 by transmitting via facsimile the document(s) listed above to the fax 

number(s) set forth below on this date before 5:00 p.m. 

: by placing the document(s) listed above in a sealed envelope with 

postage thereon fully prepaid, in the United States mail at Palo Alto, 

California addressed as set forth below. 

 by placing the document(s) listed above in a sealed facsimile & U.S. 

Mail envelope and affixing a pre-paid air bill, and causing the envelope 

to be delivered to a facsimile & U.S. Mail agent for delivery. 

 by personally delivering the document(s) listed above to the person(s) 

at the address(es) set forth below. 

Robert S. Green 

GREEN WELLING LLP 

595 Market Street, Suite 2750 

San Francisco, CA 94105 

Brendan P. Cullen 

SULLIVAN & CROMWELL LLP 

1870 Embarcadero Road 

Palo Alto, California 94303 

Harrison J. Frahn 

SIMPSON THACHER & 

BARTLETT LLP 

2550 Hanover Street 

Palo Alto, California 94304 

Daryl A. Libow 

SULLIVAN & CROMWELL LLP 

1701 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW 

Washington, DC 20006 

-5- 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 6-1 

TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT – CV 06-04793-SC 

Case 3:06-cv-04793-CRB Document 7 Filed 08/21/06 Page 5 of 6
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Charles E. Koob 

SIMPSON THACHER & 

BARTLETT LLP 

425 Lexington Avenue 

New York, NY 10017 

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of 

America that the above is true and correct. 

Executed on August 15, 2006, at Palo Alto, California. 

/s/ JESSICA F. DAVIS 

-6- 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 6-1 

TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT – CV 06-04793-SC 

Case 3:06-cv-04793-CRB Document 7 Filed 08/21/06 Page 6 of 6