Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-02261/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-02261-4/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
El Pueblo Market
Defendant
Maria Molina
Defendant
Engelberto Tejeda
Defendant
Marcy Velasquez
Plaintiff

Document Text:

Stipulation of Dismissal/Order 1 1:15-cv-2261 MMC

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Jason K. Singleton, State Bar #166170

jason@singletonlawgroup.com

SINGLETON LAW GROUP

P. O. BOX 245

Eureka, CA 95502

(707) 441-1177

Attorney for Plaintiff, MARCY VELASQUEZ 

 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MARCY VELASQUEZ,

Plaintiff,

v.

ENGELBERTO TEJEDA and MARIA 

MOLINA dba EL PUEBLO MARKET, and 

DOES ONE to FIFTY, inclusive,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 1:15-cv-2261 MMC

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH 

PREJUDICE AND (Proposed) ORDER

FRCP 41(a)(1)(A)(ii)

Plaintiff MARCY VELASQUEZ and Defendants ENGELBERTO TEJEDA and MARIA 

MOLINA dba EL PUEBLO MARKET (collectively “the Parties”), by and through their 

respective attorneys of record, hereby stipulate as follows:

1. The Parties have entered into a Confidential Settlement Agreement and General 

Release in this matter whereby they have resolved all claims and agreed to the dismissal of 

the above-captioned action with prejudice, each party to bear their own attorney fees and 

costs.

2. Accordingly, the Parties jointly request the Court to dismiss this action with 

prejudice.

///

///

///

Case 3:15-cv-02261-MMC Document 19 Filed 01/12/16 Page 1 of 2
Stipulation of Dismissal/Order 2 1:15-cv-2261 MMC

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

SINGLETON LAW GROUP

Dated: January 12, 2016 /s/ Jason K. Singleton

Jason K. Singleton, Attorney for 

Plaintiff, MARCY VELASQUEZ

FLOYD LAW FIRM

Dated: January 6, 2016 /s/ Bradford C. Floyd

Bradford C. Floyd, Attorney for Defendants

ENGELBERTO TEJEDA and MARIA MOLINA 

dba EL PUEBLO MARKET

ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

Having considered the parties’ Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice and for good 

cause appearing, it is hereby ORDERED:

1. The action Velasquez vs. Tejeda, et al., Case Number 15 CV 2261 MMC, is 

dismissed with prejudice with each party to bear their own attorney fees and costs.

Dated: ______________________ ___________________________________

MAXINE M. CHESNEY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:15-cv-02261-MMC Document 19 Filed 01/12/16 Page 2 of 2