Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-15-06835/USCOURTS-ca4-15-06835-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
J. R. Bearden
Appellee
T. Byrne
Appellee
Laura Caldwell
Appellee
Cathy Duncan
Appellee
Jennette Glen
Appellee
Lane
Appellee
Gary Lane
Appellee
Lawson
Appellee
Karen McMorris
Appellee
Nance
Appellee
Brian Keith Nesbitt
Appellant
James Parris
Appellee
Tim Riley
Appellee
Amy Spencer
Appellee
Bryan P. Stirling
Appellee
Richard Turner
Appellee
Jason Webber
Appellee

Document Text:

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-6835

BRIAN KEITH NESBITT,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

TIM RILEY, Warden; BRYAN P. STIRLING, Director of the 

Department of Corrections; AMY SPENCER; DR. J. R. BEARDEN; 

DHO RICHARD TURNER; LAURA CALDWELL; LT. LAWSON, Safety; 

ADMIN CAPTAIN NANCE; GARY LANE; INVESTIGATOR LANE; KAREN 

MCMORRIS; CAP. JENNETTE GLEN; LT. JASON WEBBER; MAJOR JAMES 

PARRIS; CAPTAIN CATHY DUNCAN; DR. T. BYRNE,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Richard Mark Gergel, District 

Judge. (0:14-cv-02788-RMG-PJG)

Submitted: October 15, 2015 Decided: October 19, 2015

Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Brian Keith Nesbitt, Appellant Pro Se. James E. Parham, Jr., 

Irmo, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 15-6835 Doc: 18 Filed: 10/19/2015 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Brian Keith Nesbitt appeals the district court’s order 

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying 

Nesbitt’s motions for a preliminary injunction and a temporary 

restraining order in this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) action. We 

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district 

court. Nesbitt v. Riley, No. 0:14-cv-02788-RMG-PJG (D.S.C. 

filed May 1, 2015 & entered May 4, 2015). We deny Nesbitt’s 

motions for appointment of counsel, a preliminary injunction, 

and a temporary restraining order. We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before this court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Appeal: 15-6835 Doc: 18 Filed: 10/19/2015 Pg: 2 of 2