Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_06-cv-06809/USCOURTS-cand-4_06-cv-06809-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
On Semiconductor Corporation
Defendant
T3 Technical Sales
Defendant
Yield Dynamics, Inc.
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

RUSSO &

HALE LLP

Palo Alto, 

California Stipulation and [Proposed] Order 1 Case No. C 06-06809 CW

13311580.1.BUSINESS

JACK RUSSO (SBN. 96068) 

TIM C. HALE (SBN. 114905) 

RUSSO & HALE LLP 

401 Florence Street 

Palo Alto, CA 94301 

Telephone: (650) 327-9800 

Facsimile: (650) 327-3737 

Email: jrusso@computerlaw.com 

Email: thale@computerlaw.com 

Attorneys for Plaintiff YIELD DYNAMICS, INC. 

CHRIS SCOTT GRAHAM (SBN. 114498) 

DECHERT LLP 

1117 California Avenue 

Palo Alto, CA 94304-1106 

Telephone: (650) 813-4800 

Facsimile: (650) 813-4848 

Email: chris.scott.graham@dechert.com 

Attorneys for Defendants, 

ON SEMICONDUCTOR CORP. and 

T3 TECHNICAL SALES 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

OAKLAND DIVISION 

YIELD DYNAMICS, INC., a California 

corporation, 

 Plaintiff, 

 vs. 

ON SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION, a 

Delaware corporation, and T3 TECHNICAL 

SALES, a California limited liability corporation, 

 Defendants. 

 

Case No.: C 06-06809 CW 

JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER TO 

CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT 

CONFERENCE 

STIPULATION 

 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the parties through their 

undersigned counsel, that: 

1. On January 8, 2007, the parties to the action filed a Joint Stipulation and Proposed Order to Stay the 

Action Pending Reissue of the Patent-in-Suit, also specifying respective deadlines for either parties’ 

identifications of “accused instrumentality” and disclosures of “prior art.” On January 11, 2007, the 

Hon. Claudia Wilken signed the Proposed Order, further ordering that a Case Management 

Conference be held on April 27, 2007, at 1:30 p.m. 

2. Plaintiff Yield Dynamics, Inc. (“YDI”) represents that despite its efforts, its reissue application for 

the patent-in-suit, U.S. Patent No. 6,470,229 (“’229 Patent”), remains pending before the United 

Case 4:06-cv-06809-CW Document 22 Filed 04/10/07 Page 1 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

& HALE LLP lto, California Stipulation and [Proposed] Order 2 Case No. 4:06-cv-04579 SBA

13311580.1.BUSINESS

States Patent and Trademark Office (“PTO”). Both parties represent that to date, they have satisfied 

their obligations specified in the Order of January 11, 2007. 

3. Upon consideration of the pending reissue application, and in the interest of judicial economy, the 

parties respectfully request that the Court continue the Case Management Conference to a date at 

least two months from April 27, 2007, to allow the PTO sufficient time to reissue the ‘229 Patent 

and the parties adequate time to reinstate the action. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED: 

RUSSO & HALE LLP DECHERT LLP 

By: /s/ By: /s/ 

 Tim C. Hale Chris Scott Graham 

Attorneys for Plaintiff Attorneys for Defendants 

YIELD DYNAMICS, INC. ON SEMICONDUCTOR CORP. and 

 T3 TECHNICAL SALES 

Dated: April 5, 2007 Dated: April 5, 2007 

VERIFICATION OF AUTHORIZATION TO SIGN AND FILE: 

 On April 5, 2007, Chris Scott Graham authorized me to sign and electronically file this document on 

behalf of all parties. 

 RUSSO & HALE LLP 

 By: /s/ 

 Tim C. Hale 

Case 4:06-cv-06809-CW Document 22 Filed 04/10/07 Page 2 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

& HALE LLP lto, California Stipulation and [Proposed] Order 3 Case No. 4:06-cv-04579 SBA

13311580.1.BUSINESS

ORDER 

 Based on the Stipulation of the parties, it is hereby ORDERED as follows: 

 1. The case management conference is hereby continued from April 27, 2007, at 1:30 p.m. to 

July 24, 2007, at 2:00 p.m. 

 4/10/07 

Date: 

 United States District Court Judge

Case 4:06-cv-06809-CW Document 22 Filed 04/10/07 Page 3 of 3