Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-00635/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-00635-3/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Analogix Semiconductor, Inc.
Counter-claimant
Silicon Image, Inc.
Counter-defendant

Document Text:

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 1 CASE NO. C07-00635 JCS 

Counsel Listed on Signature Page 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

SILICON IMAGE, INC., a Delaware 

corporation, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

ANALOGIX SEMICONDUCTOR, INC., 

a Delaware corporation, 

Defendant. 

Case No. C 07-00635 JCS 

STIPULATED [PROPOSED] 

PROTECTIVE ORDER 

To facilitate discovery and, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c), to protect 

the confidentiality of and rights to information and documents disclosed in connection with this 

litigation, the parties hereby stipulate to the following: 

1. Applicability of This Protective Order. All information, things, and documents 

filed with the Court or produced by any party or non-party in discovery in this action shall be 

governed by this Protective Order. 

2. Use of Information Produced Pursuant to This Order. Information and material 

produced or exchanged in discovery in this case and designated by a party or non-party as 

“Confidential” or “Confidential – Outside Attorneys’ Eyes Only” pursuant to the terms of this 

Protective Order (hereafter, “Confidential Material”) shall not be made available to any person or 

entity except as authorized under this Protective Order. Confidential Material shall be used, by 

Case 3:07-cv-00635-JCS Document 29 Filed 05/25/2007 Page 1 of 17
 Case 3:07-cv-00635-JCS Document 30 Filed 05/29/07 Page 1 of 17
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 2 CASE NO. C07-00635 JCS 

the party or parties to whom the information is produced, solely for the purpose of litigating the 

above-captioned action, and not for any business, competitive or other purpose. Unless otherwise 

provided in this Protective Order, agreed in writing by the producing party or so ordered by a 

court, such information and material shall not either (1) be disclosed to any other person or entity 

or (2) be used or disclosed for any other use or purpose. For purposes of this Protective Order, 

the party or non-party designating information or material as Confidential Material is defined as 

the “Designating Party.” Nothing contained in this Protective Order shall affect the right of a 

Designating Party to disclose or use its own Confidential Material for any purpose. Nothing in 

this Protective Order shall limit or bar any attorney from rendering advise or counsel to his or her 

client with respect to this litigation or, in the connection with rendering such advise or counsel, 

from conveying such attorney’s evaluation or assessment of Confidential Material, provided that, 

such conveyance, advise, or counsel does not disclose the contents of any Confidential Material 

produced by another party herein, which disclosure would be contrary to the terms of this 

Protective Order. 

3. Designation of Confidential Materials. A party or non-party may designate 

Confidential Materials with one of the following Confidential Designations: 

(a) Confidential Information Designation. A party or non-party may 

designate as “Confidential” any document, material, item, deposition testimony, or information 

that is filed with the Court or produced in discovery in this action and is or contains confidential 

technical, research, development, proprietary, financial, or commercial information of the 

Designating Party, or personal information or information furnished to the Designating Party in 

confidence by any third-party. 

(b) Confidential – Outside Attorneys’ Eyes Only Designation. A party or 

non-party may designate as “Confidential – Outside Attorneys’ Eyes Only” any document, 

material, item, deposition testimony, or information that is filed with the Court or produced in 

discovery in this action and is or contains highly confidential financial, commercial, proprietary, 

marketing, research, development, or technical information (including but not limited to source 

code, register maps and detailed nonpublic financial information) of the Designating Party (or of 

Case 3:07-cv-00635-JCS Document 29 Filed 05/25/2007 Page 2 of 17
 Case 3:07-cv-00635-JCS Document 30 Filed 05/29/07 Page 2 of 17
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 3 CASE NO. C07-00635 JCS 

a third-party and in the possession of the Designating Party), the disclosure of which, to persons 

other than those described in paragraphs 7(a), 7(b), 7(c), 7(d), 7(e), 7(g) or 7(h) below, the 

Designating Party in good faith believes would be of value to a competitor or potential competitor 

of the party or nonparty holding the proprietary rights thereto. 

4. Patenting and Patent Protected Persons

(a) “Patenting” shall mean and include: 

(i) preparing and/or prosecuting any patent application (or portion 

thereof), whether design or utility, and either in the United States or abroad (and including 

applications filed under the Patent Cooperation Treaty) relating to “Confidential – Outside 

Attorneys’ Eyes Only” Confidential Material received in this litigation that relates to the field of 

architecture and semiconductor implementations for storage, distribution and presentation of 

high-definition content; 

(ii) preparing patent claim(s) relating to “Confidential – Outside 

Attorneys’ Eyes Only” Confidential Material received in this litigation that relates to the field as 

defined in (i) above; 

(iii) providing advice, counsel or suggestion regarding, or in any other 

way influencing, claim scope and/or language, embodiment(s) for claim coverage, claim(s) for 

prosecution, or products or processes for coverage by claim(s) relating to “Confidential – Outside 

Attorneys’ Eyes Only” Confidential Material received in this litigation that relates to the field as 

defined in (i) above; and 

(iv) assisting, consulting with, supervising, and/or providing counsel to 

anyone in connection with doing any of the foregoing. 

(b) The “Patent Protected Persons” for a party shall mean and include any and 

all persons involved, either directly or indirectly, with Patenting any application where any right, 

title or interest in the application are owned by such party and/or there exists an obligation to 

transfer rights in the application to the party, and includes, but is not limited to, any person who is 

an inventor for any party of any method, apparatus or other invention that is or is anticipated to be 

the subject of a patent or application therefor. Patent Protected Persons specifically includes, but 

Case 3:07-cv-00635-JCS Document 29 Filed 05/25/2007 Page 3 of 17
 Case 3:07-cv-00635-JCS Document 30 Filed 05/29/07 Page 3 of 17
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 4 CASE NO. C07-00635 JCS 

is not limited to, all individuals associated with the filing or prosecution of the patent application 

within the meaning of 37 C.F.R. 1.56. “Party” as used herein shall include affiliates, parents, 

subsidiaries, and other entities which are under common ownership and control. 

5. Designating and Marking Confidential Material. Confidential Material shall be 

designated and marked as follows: 

(a) A document is to be designated as Confidential Material by stamping or 

writing on it one of the following legends, or an equivalent thereof: “Confidential” or 

“Confidential – Outside Attorneys’ Eyes Only.” Whichever legend is used shall be placed on the 

first page of the document and on each page that the Designating Party claims to contain 

Confidential Material. 

(b) A physical device is to be designated as Confidential Material by stamping 

or writing on it or on the packaging enclosing it one of the legends specified in subsection 5(a) 

above. 

(c) Information or material produced digitally, e.g., on a magnetic or optical 

medium or by network communication, is to be designated as Confidential Material by marking 

the medium, container or communication with one of the legends specified in subsection 5(a) 

above. If any person or entity who receives such a designated medium prints or otherwise 

transfers to another medium any of the information, any resulting document or other medium 

shall be marked by that person or entity as Confidential Material in accordance with 

subsection 5(a) above or this subsection 5(b). 

(d) A physical exhibit, including but not limited to any electronic file or 

document printed for use at a deposition, in a court proceeding, or for provision to a qualified 

expert, is to be designated as Confidential Material by affixing to it a label with one of the 

legends specified in subsection 5(a) above. 

(e) A discovery response is to be designated as Confidential Material by 

placing, on the first page of the set of responses and on each page that contains information that 

the Designating Party claims to be Confidential Material, one of the legends specified in 

subsection 5(a) above. 

Case 3:07-cv-00635-JCS Document 29 Filed 05/25/2007 Page 4 of 17
 Case 3:07-cv-00635-JCS Document 30 Filed 05/29/07 Page 4 of 17
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 5 CASE NO. C07-00635 JCS 

(f) Portions or the entirety of a deposition transcript (including exhibits) are to 

be designated as Confidential Material (1) by making a statement to that effect on the record, 

during the deposition, or (2) by sending to all other parties, the court reporter for the deposition, 

and all other persons known to the Designating Party to have received a copy of the deposition 

transcript, on or before ten (10) business days after counsel for the Designating Party receives the 

final deposition transcript, a letter or other written notice designating the portions or entirety of 

the transcript with a Confidential Designation. The letter or other notice shall cite this Protective 

Order, identify the appropriate level of confidentiality, and, if available, identify the pages and 

lines, and/or exhibits, to be Confidential Material. Each copy of the transcript, and portions 

thereof, so designated shall be marked, by the person receiving the letter or other notice, with the 

legend specified in subparagraph 5(a) above indicating the level of confidentiality claimed by the 

Designating Party and shall be governed by the terms of this Protective Order. Unless the parties 

agree differently, the entire transcript shall be treated as containing Confidential – Outside 

Attorneys’ Eyes Only Material until ten (10) business days after counsel for the Designating Party 

receives the final deposition transcript, at which point the transcript will no longer be treated as 

confidential unless a Designating Party has designated in writing the portions or entirety of the 

transcript as “Confidential” or “Confidential – Outside Attorneys’ Eyes Only.” 

If a deposition or portion thereof is designated on the record, during the deposition, with 

one of the Confidential Designations, the deposition shall continue in the absence of all persons to 

whom access to Confidential Material is not permitted under this Protective Order. The court 

reporter or videographer shall separately bind any portion of the transcript of the deposition or 

hearing that has been designated to contain Confidential Material. Copies of the separately bound 

portions of the transcript containing Confidential Material may be provided only to persons 

permitted by the provisions of this Protective Order to receive such Confidential Material. When 

any such separately bound portion of the transcript is provided by the court reporter or 

videographer, it shall be provided in a separate, sealed envelope. 

6. Inadvertent Misdesignation. A Designating Party that inadvertently fails to mark 

an item with one of the Confidential Designations or marks an item with an incorrect designation 

Case 3:07-cv-00635-JCS Document 29 Filed 05/25/2007 Page 5 of 17
 Case 3:07-cv-00635-JCS Document 30 Filed 05/29/07 Page 5 of 17
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 6 CASE NO. C07-00635 JCS 

of confidentiality at the time of the production shall have 15 days after learning of the inadvertent 

failure or mistake to correct its failure or mistake. The correction shall be made in writing and 

shall be accompanied by substitute copies of each item, appropriately marked as Confidential 

Material. Within five days of receipt of the substitute copies, the receiving party shall return or 

destroy the previously unmarked, or incorrectly marked, items and all copies thereof and confirm 

in writing to the Designating Party such return or destruction. 

7. Disclosure of Information Designated Confidential. Documents, materials, 

items, testimony or information designated Confidential pursuant to this Protective Order, or 

copies or extracts therefrom, and compilations and summaries thereof, and the information 

therein, may be given, shown, made available to or communicated in any way only to the 

following persons, provided that (1) such persons are not Patent Protected Persons for the 

receiving party, and (2) such persons, during the pendency of this litigation and for two years 

after the conclusion thereof, including any appeals, do not participate in any Patenting: 

(a) Retained outside counsel of record to any party to this litigation, and 

employees, contractors, or vendors of such outside counsel (or such counsel’s law firm) who 

work under the supervision of, and support such counsel, and have no financial interest in the 

outcome of the case; 

(b) Independent consultants or expert witnesses performing services in 

connection with the prosecution or defense of this litigation, provided that each such person is not 

a member, officer, director, or employee of or for the receiving party or any other party that is a 

competitor of the producing party, and provided that each such person: 

(i) executes a copy of the Certification attached to this Order as 

Exhibit A; 

(ii) has been previously approved pursuant to the procedure in 

paragraph 11(a), below; 

(iii) is not presently engaged in Patenting and shall not engage in any 

Patenting during the pendency of this litigation, including any appeals therefrom, and for a period 

of two years thereafter. 

Case 3:07-cv-00635-JCS Document 29 Filed 05/25/2007 Page 6 of 17
 Case 3:07-cv-00635-JCS Document 30 Filed 05/29/07 Page 6 of 17
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 7 CASE NO. C07-00635 JCS 

(c) Deposition witnesses, where at least one of the following conditions 

applies: 

(i) The witness is/was an employee of the Designating Party when the 

disclosure is made or at the time Confidential Material was created; 

(ii) the attorney taking the deposition and showing the witness the 

Confidential Material represents the Designating Party; 

(iii) the witness’s name appears on the Confidential Material as a person 

who has previously seen or received the Confidential Material, or it is otherwise established that 

the witness has previously seen, received, or had access to the Confidential Material or knows the 

information contained within it; 

(iv) the Designating Party has consented on the record of the deposition 

or in writing prior to the deposition to the showing of the Confidential Material to the witness; or 

(d) The Court in this proceeding, Court personnel, and Court reporters; 

(e) Litigation support services, including independent document copiers, 

graphic artists and jury consultants who have an obligation to keep such information confidential; 

(f) Any named party to the litigation, including any present or former 

employee thereof to whom it is necessary that the material be shown for purposes of this 

litigation, but only if such person is not involved, directly or indirectly, in Patenting (for example, 

an inventor for any party of any method, apparatus or other invention that is or could be the 

subject of a patent); 

(g) Mock Jurors or Focus Group Members engaged by a jury consultant in 

preparation for trial, provided that: 

(i) No such persons are officers, directors, or employees of any of the 

parties to this action or of any direct competitors of the parties; 

(ii) That any such persons shall first agree in writing to be bound by 

this Protective Order (by signing the nondisclosure agreement attached hereto as Exhibit B or 

other Certification with equivalent terms); 

Case 3:07-cv-00635-JCS Document 29 Filed 05/25/2007 Page 7 of 17
 Case 3:07-cv-00635-JCS Document 30 Filed 05/29/07 Page 7 of 17
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 8 CASE NO. C07-00635 JCS 

(iii) Such agreements be retained under the control of counsel until final 

termination of these actions; and 

(iv) Upon final termination of these actions and at the written request of 

the person or entity designating or producing such disclosed information, all such executed 

agreements by mock jurors and focus group members to whom such materials have been 

disclosed shall be provided upon request to counsel of record for the person or entity that 

designated or produced such materials. 

(h) Any other person as to whom the Designating Party first agrees in writing. 

8. Disclosure of Information Designated Confidential – Outside Attorneys’ Eyes 

Only. Documents, materials, items, testimony or information designated Confidential – Outside 

Attorneys’ Eyes Only pursuant to this Protective Order, or copies or extracts therefrom, and 

compilations and summaries thereof, and the information therein, may be given, shown, made 

available to or communicated in any way only to the following persons, provided that (1) such 

persons are not Patent Protected Persons for the receiving party, and (2) such persons, during the 

pendency of this litigation and for two years after the conclusion thereof, including any appeals, 

do not participate in any Patenting: the persons described in paragraphs 7(a), 7(b), 7(c), 7(d), 

7(e), 7(g) or 7(h). 

9. Protections for Parties’ Source Code. All source code produced by a party to this 

suit pursuant to pretrial discovery shall be subject to the same restrictions as information 

designated as Highly Confidential – Outside Attorneys’ Eyes Only, provided that such party 

designates such source code as Highly Confidential – Outside Attorneys’ Eyes Only – Source 

Code. In addition, the following restrictions shall apply to source code designated by a party to 

this suit as Highly Confidential – Outside Attorneys’ Eyes Only – Source Code: 

(a) A single electronic copy of source code or executable code shall be 

produced to the outside counsel of record for the receiving party. The produced electronic copy 

may be in an encrypted form and the producing party must provide the receiving party with 

specific decryption instructions and a decryption software application, if such application is 

necessary, for decoding the code. 

Case 3:07-cv-00635-JCS Document 29 Filed 05/25/2007 Page 8 of 17
 Case 3:07-cv-00635-JCS Document 30 Filed 05/29/07 Page 8 of 17
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 9 CASE NO. C07-00635 JCS 

(b) Except as provided in paragraph 9(d)(ii) below, such electronic copy may 

only be installed on a single stand-alone non-networked desktop computer in such outside 

counsel’s offices and may not be removed from those offices except to the extent it may be 

temporarily stored at the site where any deposition related to the information is being taken, the 

courthouse, or any intermediate location reasonably necessary to transport the material to the site 

of a deposition or the courthouse (e.g., a hotel prior to the deposition). The received electronic 

copy and all temporary copies must be stored in an encrypted form with such encryption protocol 

designed to limit access to those persons designated under this Order. 

(c) The stand-alone computer and any other computer with temporary copies 

of the code shall be equipped with a password protection/lockout/screen saver function having a 

“timeout” period of ten (10) minutes or less; the password for such function shall be known only 

to those people who are allowed to have access to the code in accordance with this Order. 

(d) Other than prescribed in this Protective Order, source code may not be 

printed or copied without the agreement of the producing party or further order of the Court, 

except: 

(i) hard copies of a source code file or excerpts of a source code file 

may be made to the extent necessary for the persons allowed access to “Highly Confidential – 

Outside Attorneys’ Eyes Only” information under paragraph 8, provided that material printed 

from the source code production shall be marked “Highly Confidential – Outside Attorneys’ Eyes 

Only – Source Code”; 

(ii) one electronic copy may be made for, and held at the offices of, 

each expert subject to the requirements of paragraphs 7 and 11 hereof, provided that any 

electronic, magnetic or other machine-readable copy is protected by encryption. Such copies 

shall be treated as set forth herein; 

(iii) volatile copies necessarily made in the course of loading, accessing, 

and analyzing the source code on the non-networked computer, may be made without prior 

consent of the providing party. 

Case 3:07-cv-00635-JCS Document 29 Filed 05/25/2007 Page 9 of 17
 Case 3:07-cv-00635-JCS Document 30 Filed 05/29/07 Page 9 of 17
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 10 CASE NO. C07-00635 JCS 

(e) Under no circumstances may material designated “Highly Confidential – 

Outside Attorneys’ Eyes Only – Source Code” be transmitted electronically, e.g., via modem, 

network or the Internet, by or at the direction of anyone including counsel or an expert or 

consultant for the receiving party. 

10. Protests of Designation of Confidential Material. Protests of the designation of 

Confidential Material will occur only as follows: 

(a) If a party believes that material bearing a Confidential Designation is not in 

fact the proper subject for such designation, or should be reclassified or revealed to an individual 

not otherwise authorized to have access to such material under the terms of this Order, then such 

party shall provide to the Designating Party written notice of this disagreement with the 

designation. The parties shall first try to resolve such dispute in good faith on an informal basis. 

(b) If the parties are unable to resolve their dispute, then the party challenging 

the designation may request appropriate relief from the Court. It shall be the burden of the 

Designating Party to establish that the contested material is confidential. In any event, unless and 

until a Court ruling is obtained changing a designation, or the parties agree otherwise, the material 

involved shall be treated according to its designation. 

11. Procedure for Qualifying Independent Experts and Consultants. In order for an 

independent expert or consultant to be permitted access to materials bearing a Confidential 

Designation the counsel of the party employing the expert or consultant must notify in writing the 

Designating Party or parties, at least ten (10) business days before allowing such access (or such 

shorter period to which the Designating Party agrees in writing). The identification of an expert 

or consultant pursuant to this Order shall not be construed as the identification of an expert trial 

witness under Federal Rule 26(a)(2), and shall not constitute a waiver of attorney work-product 

protection or the attorney-client privilege. 

(a) Contents of the Written Notification: Such written notice shall include the 

following: (1) The name of the expert or consultant; (2) The present employer and title of the 

expert or consultant; (3) a copy of a Certification (attached hereto as Exhibit A) signed by the 

expert or consultant that states that the expert or consultant has read and understood the terms of 

Case 3:07-cv-00635-JCS Document 29 Filed 05/25/2007 Page 10 of 17
 Case 3:07-cv-00635-JCS Document 30 Filed 05/29/07 Page 10 of 17
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 11 CASE NO. C07-00635 JCS 

this Order and agrees to be bound by its terms; (4) a current curriculum vitae that lists all 

employers and clients to whom the expert or consultant has provided services in the past five (5) 

years, cases in which the expert or consultant has testified as an expert at trial or by deposition in 

litigation relating to semiconductor technology at any time, and all cases in which the expert or 

consultant has testified as an expert at trial or by deposition within the past five (5) years. 

(b) Objections by Disclosing Parties: Before the ten (10) business day period 

from the receipt of the written notification has expired, a Designating Party may object in writing 

to the disclosure of materials bearing a Confidential Designation to the expert or consultant in 

question. Should a Designating Party so object, no material bearing a Confidential Designation 

that is the subject of the Designating Party's objection shall be disclosed to the expert or 

consultant in question until the objection has been resolved by the parties or by the Court. 

12. Use of Confidential Material by Designating Party. Nothing in this Protective 

Order limits a party’s ability to show materials which that party has designated with a 

Confidential Designation to whomever the Designating Party may deem appropriate. Further, 

nothing in this Protective Order limits a party’s ability to show materials designated by another 

party with a Confidential Designation to that Designating Party, including any present officer, 

director, employee, or representative thereof. 

13. Jurisdiction. Each person receiving Confidential Material under the terms of this 

Protective Order hereby agrees to subject himself or herself to the jurisdiction of this Court for 

purposes of any proceedings relating to the performance under, compliance with, or violation of 

this Protective Order. 

14. Protecting Confidential Materials. Each person who receives any Confidential 

Material shall exercise due and proper care, in connection with the storage, custody, use, and 

dissemination of such material, to avoid any intentional or inadvertent disclosure to persons to 

whom disclosure is not permitted under this Protective Order. 

15. Confidential Materials to Be Filed Under Seal. Any Confidential Material 

designated with a Confidential Designation that is to be filed with a Court in connection with any 

proceedings herein, shall be filed with the clerk of the Court in accordance with the Court’s then 

Case 3:07-cv-00635-JCS Document 29 Filed 05/25/2007 Page 11 of 17
 Case 3:07-cv-00635-JCS Document 30 Filed 05/29/07 Page 11 of 17
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 12 CASE NO. C07-00635 JCS 

subsisting procedures therefor. Unless proscribed, the heading, case caption, case number, and 

document title must be prominently marked on the front of a sealed envelope with the 

Confidential Material in addition to the following legend: 

CONFIDENTIAL – FILED UNDER SEAL 

SUBJECT TO A PROTECTIVE ORDER 

16. Information Protected by Privilege, Work Product, or Other Doctrine. The 

inadvertent production of any document or other materials or information which the producing 

party contends is subject to the attorney-client privilege, work-product protection, or any other 

privilege or protection against discovery shall not necessarily be deemed a waiver in whole or in 

part of the claim of privilege or protection, either as to the specific document or the information 

disclosed or as to any other document or information relating thereto. Within a reasonable time 

after the discovery of the inadvertent production, the producing party shall give notice to the 

receiving party that privileged documents or information have been inadvertently produced or 

disclosed and request the return of such documents. Any document or portion of transcript, 

including all copies thereof, constituting or containing information as to which notice of 

inadvertent production is given shall be returned to the producing party within fifteen (15) days of 

such demand. If the receiving party objects to the claim of privilege, the claim of inadvertent 

production and/or the reasonableness of the notice given, the receiving party and the producing 

party shall attempt to resolve the dispute. If the dispute is not resolved, the receiving party may 

move the Court to compel the re-production of the document(s) at issue. From the time of the 

producing party’s notification of inadvertent production, any documents or information as to 

which notice is given shall be deemed and treated as privileged and shall not be used for any 

purpose until the Court enters an order ruling otherwise, or until the receiving party and the 

producing party otherwise agree. 

17. Conclusion of Litigation. All provisions of this Protective Order restricting the 

communication or use of Confidential Material shall continue to be binding after the conclusion 

of this action, unless otherwise agreed in writing by all the parties or ordered by the Court. Upon 

conclusion of the litigation, including the running of any time to appeal or to move for relief 

Case 3:07-cv-00635-JCS Document 29 Filed 05/25/2007 Page 12 of 17
 Case 3:07-cv-00635-JCS Document 30 Filed 05/29/07 Page 12 of 17
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 13 CASE NO. C07-00635 JCS 

under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(B)(1)-(3), a party in possession of Confidential Material, other than that 

which is contained in pleadings, correspondence, attorney files, and deposition transcripts, shall 

either (a) return such documents, no later than 30 days after conclusion of this action, to counsel 

for the party or non-party who provided such information, or, upon consent of the Designating 

Party, (b) destroy the documents within that time period and certify in writing within that time 

period that the documents have been destroyed. 

18. Use of Confidential Material During Court Proceedings. If any Confidential 

Material is used in any Court pretrial proceeding in this litigation (including, but not limited to, 

conferences, oral arguments, and hearings), the Confidential Material shall not lose its status as 

Confidential Material through such use. The parties shall take all steps reasonably necessary to 

protect the confidentiality of the Confidential Material during any such use, including, but not 

limited to, requesting in camera proceedings. The terms of this Protective Order do not preclude, 

limit, restrict, or otherwise apply to the use of documents at trial. The parties agree to meet and 

confer in good faith prior to trial to establish procedures for the use of Confidential Material at 

trial. 

19. Improper Disclosure of Confidential Materials. If any Confidential Material is 

disclosed to any person to whom such disclosure is not authorized by this Protective Order, or 

other than in a manner authorized by this Protective Order, the party responsible for the 

disclosure shall, upon discovery of the disclosure, immediately inform the Designating Party of 

all facts pertinent to the disclosure that, after due diligence and prompt investigation, are known 

to the party responsible for the disclosure (including the name, address, telephone number, and 

employer of the person to whom the disclosure was made), shall immediately take all reasonable 

efforts to prevent further disclosure by each unauthorized person who received such information, 

and shall immediately require each unauthorized person to return all Confidential Material that 

was improperly disclosed to that person, all copies made of the improperly disclosed Confidential 

Material, and all documents containing excerpts from or references to the improperly disclosed 

Confidential Material. 

Case 3:07-cv-00635-JCS Document 29 Filed 05/25/2007 Page 13 of 17
 Case 3:07-cv-00635-JCS Document 30 Filed 05/29/07 Page 13 of 17
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 14 CASE NO. C07-00635 JCS 

20. No Admissions. Compliance with this Protective Order in no way constitutes an 

admission by any party that any information designated pursuant to this Protective Order is or is 

not proprietary, confidential, or a trade secret. 

21. Modification of Protective Order. Each party reserves the right to request that the 

Court modify the terms of this Protective Order in the event that the party believes that a 

modification is necessary. If such an application is made, all signatories of copies of the 

Certification, as well as persons described herein, shall remain bound by this Protective Order 

unless and until it is modified by the Court. 

SO STIPULATED: 

DATED: May 25, 2007 

SILICON IMAGE, INC. 

By /s/J. David Hadden

 J. David Hadden 

J. DAVID HADDEN (CSB No. 176148) 

 dhadden@fenwick.com 

SAINA S. SHAMILOV (CSB No. 215636) 

 sshamilov@fenwick.com 

RYAN A. TYZ (CSB No. 234895) 

 rtyz@fenwick.com 

FENWICK & WEST LLP 

Silicon Valley Center, 

801 California Street 

Mountain View, CA 94041 

Telephone: (650) 988-8500 

Facsimile: (650) 938-5200 

JEDEDIAH WAKEFIELD (CSB No. 178058) 

 jwakefield@fenwick.com 

DAVID D. SCHUMANN (CSB No. 223936) 

 dschumann@fenwick.com 

FENWICK & WEST LLP 

555 California Street, Suite 1200 

San Francisco, CA 94104 

Telephone: (415) 875-2300 

Facsimile: (415) 281-1350 

ANALOGIX SEMICONDUCTOR, INC. 

By /s/Luann L Simmons 

 Luann L. Simmons 

DARIN W. SNYDER (CSB No. 136003) 

 dsnyder@omm.com 

RYAN J. PADDEN (CSB No. 204515) 

 rpadden@omm.com 

LUANN L. SIMMONS (CSB No. 203526) 

 lsimmons@omm.com 

O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP 

Embarcadero Center West 

275 Battery Street 

San Francisco, CA 94111-3305 

Telephone: (415) 984-8700 

Facsimile: (415) 984-8701 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: Joseph C. Spero 

 United States Magistrate Judge 

Case 3:07-cv-00635-JCS Document 29 Filed 05/25/2007 Page 14 of 17

May 29, 2007

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

Judge Joseph C. Spero

Case 3:07-cv-00635-JCS Document 30 Filed 05/29/07 Page 14 of 17
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 15 CASE NO. C07-00635 JCS 

EXHIBIT A 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SILICON IMAGE, INC., a Delaware 

corporation, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

ANALOGIX SEMICONDUCTOR, INC., 

a Delaware corporation, 

Defendant. 

Case No. C 07-00635 JCS 

CONSENT TO BE BOUND BY STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER

I, the undersigned, hereby acknowledge that I have read the Stipulated Protective Order in 

this case, understand its terms, agree to be bound by them, and consent to the jurisdiction of the 

United States District Court for the Northern District of California to enforce them. 

I acknowledge that I will treat any Confidential Material I receive in this action strictly according 

to the terms of the Protective Order, and I understand that any unauthorized use of the 

Confidential Material I receive constitutes contempt of court. 

Dated: 

Case 3:07-cv-00635-JCS Document 29 Filed 05/25/2007 Page 15 of 17
 Case 3:07-cv-00635-JCS Document 30 Filed 05/29/07 Page 15 of 17
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 16 CASE NO. C07-00635 JCS 

EXHIBIT B 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SILICON IMAGE, INC., a Delaware 

corporation, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

ANALOGIX SEMICONDUCTOR, INC., 

a Delaware corporation, 

Defendant. 

Case No. C 07-00635 JCS 

NONDISCLOSURE AGREEMENT 

(FOR UNDERTAKING BY MOCK JURORS OR FOCUS GROUP MEMBERS)

I hereby acknowledge that in the course of my activities in this case, I may receive 

confidential research, development, commercial, financial, marketing, or technical information; 

that such information is normally kept secret from the public at large, from the parties’ 

competitors, and even from many or most employees of the party that owns that information; and 

that the disclosure of such information would likely harm the competitive position of the party 

that owns that information. 

I hereby agree that any unauthorized use or disclosure of the Confidential Material I 

receive constitutes contempt of court, and shall be punishable as such; that I will exercise due and 

proper care in connection with the storage, custody, and use of such material; and that, at the 

conclusion of my activities in this case, I will promptly return all information that I have received 

from any party to this case or their attorney. 

I hereby consent to the jurisdiction of the United States District Court for the Northern 

District of California to enforce this Agreement. 

Dated: 

Case 3:07-cv-00635-JCS Document 29 Filed 05/25/2007 Page 16 of 17
 Case 3:07-cv-00635-JCS Document 30 Filed 05/29/07 Page 16 of 17
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 17 CASE NO. C07-00635 JCS 

DECLARATION PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 45, § X.B 

I, J. David Hadden, hereby declare pursuant to General Order 45, § X.B, that I have 

obtained the concurrence in the filing of this document from the other signatory listed above. 

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing declaration is true and correct. 

Executed May 25, 2007 at Mountain View, California. 

 FENWICK & WEST LLP 

By: /s/J. David Hadden 

J. David Hadden 

J. DAVID HADDEN (CSB No. 176148) 

 dhadden@fenwick.com 

SAINA S. SHAMILOV (CSB No. 215636) 

 sshamilov@fenwick.com 

RYAN A. TYZ (CSB No. 234895) 

 rtyz@fenwick.com 

FENWICK & WEST LLP 

Silicon Valley Center, 801 California Street 

Mountain View, CA 94041 

Telephone: (650) 988-8500 

Facsimile: (650) 938-5200 

JEDEDIAH WAKEFIELD (CSB No. 178058) 

 jwakefield@fenwick.com 

DAVID D. SCHUMANN (CSB No. 223936) 

 dschumann@fenwick.com 

FENWICK & WEST LLP 

555 California Street, Suite 1200 

San Francisco, CA 94104 

Telephone: (415) 875-2300 

Facsimile: (415) 281-1350 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

SILICON IMAGE, INC. 

Case 3:07-cv-00635-JCS Document 29 Filed 05/25/2007 Page 17 of 17
 Case 3:07-cv-00635-JCS Document 30 Filed 05/29/07 Page 17 of 17