Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-00727/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-00727-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Respondent
Arnold Rasalid Hailassie
Petitioner

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

—o0o—

ARNOLD RASALID HAILASSIE, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

v. )

)

)

FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, )

)

Respondent. )

 )

1:07-cv-00727-OWW-TAG HC

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO

GRANT PETITIONER’S MOTION TO

VOLUNTARILY DISMISS PETITION

(Doc. 4)

ORDER DIRECTING OBJECTIONS TO BE

FILED WITHIN FIFTEEN DAYS

Petitioner is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se with an application for writ of habeas

corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. 

The instant federal petition for writ of habeas corpus was filed on May 17, 2007. (Doc.

1). On October 9, 2007, Petitioner filed the instant motion to voluntarily dismiss the petition. 

(Doc. 4). 

Subject to other provisions of law, a petitioner may voluntarily dismiss an action without

leave of court before service by the adverse party of an answer or motion for summary judgment. 

Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a). Otherwise, an action shall not be dismissed except upon order of the court

and upon such terms and conditions as the court deems proper. Id. Here, no answer or motion

for summary judgment has been served or filed. 

RECOMMENDATIONS

Accordingly, the Court makes the following recommendations:

1. That Petitioner’s motion for voluntary dismissal (Doc. 4), be GRANTED; and 

2. That the petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. 1) be dismissed. 

Case 1:07-cv-00727-OWW -TAG Document 5 Filed 11/15/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

These Findings and Recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 

assigned to this case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(B) and Rule 72-304 of

the Local Rules of Practice for the United States District Court, Eastern District of California. 

Within fifteen (15) days after being served with a copy, any party may file written objections

with the Court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned “Objections

to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” The District Judge will then review the

Magistrate Judge’s ruling pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(C). The parties are advised that

failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District

Judge’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: November 14, 2007 /s/ Theresa A. Goldner 

j6eb3d UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

Case 1:07-cv-00727-OWW -TAG Document 5 Filed 11/15/07 Page 2 of 2