Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-mc-80112/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-mc-80112-2/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
CallWave Communications, LLC
Plaintiff
Location Labs
Defendant
WaveMarket, Inc.
Defendant

Document Text:

UNITED 

STATES 

DISTRICT 

COURT

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

C 14-80112 JSW (LB)

UNITED 

STATES 

DISTRICT 

COURT

For the Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Northern District of California

San Francisco Division

CALLWAVE COMMUNICATIONS, LLC,

Petitioner,

v.

WAVEMARKET, INC. D/B/A LOCATION

LABS,

Respondent.

_____________________________________/

No. C 14-80112 JSW (LB)

ORDER REGARDING CALLWAVE’S

ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION FOR

LEAVE TO FILE UNDER SEAL

DATED DECEMBER 15, 2014

[Re: ECF No. 42]

On December 15, 2014, Callwave filed an administrative motion for leave to file under seal three

documents that Location Labs designated as “Highly Confidential - Attorneys’ Eyes Only” in

accordance with the protective order entered in this action. See Administrative Motion, ECF No. 42. 

In this situation, Civil Local Rule 79-5 requires the designating party—in this case, Location

Labs—to file a declaration establishing that the three documents are sealable. Specifically, Civil

Local Rule 79-5(e) provides: 

(e) Documents Designated as Confidential or Subject to a Protective Order. If

the Submitting Party is seeking to file under seal a document designated as

confidential by the opposing party or a non-party pursuant to a protective order, or a

document containing information so designated by an opposing party or a non-party,

the Submitting Party’s declaration in support of the Administrative Motion to File

Under Seal must identify the document or portions thereof which contain the

designated confidential material and identify the party that has designated the

material as confidential (“the Designating Party”). The declaration must be served on

the Designating Party on the same day it is filed and a proof of such service must also

be filed.

Case 3:14-mc-80112-LB Document 48 Filed 01/05/15 Page 1 of 2
UNITED 

STATES 

DISTRICT 

COURT

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

C 14-80112 JSW (LB)

2

 (1) Within 4 days of the filing of the Administrative Motion to File Under Seal, the

Designating Party must file a declaration as required by subsection 79-5(d)(1)(A)

establishing that all of the designated material is sealable.

 (2) If the Designating Party does not file a responsive declaration as required by

subsection 79-5(e)(1) and the Administrative Motion to File Under Seal is denied, the

Submitting Party may file the document in the public record no earlier than 4 days,

and no later than 10 days, after the motion is denied. A Judge may delay the public

docketing of the document upon a showing of good cause.

So far, Location Labs has filed no such declaration. Locations Labs must do so by 12:00 PM

noon on January 8, 2015 to avoid Callwave’s administrative motion being denied for this reason.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 5, 2015 _______________________________

LAUREL BEELER

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:14-mc-80112-LB Document 48 Filed 01/05/15 Page 2 of 2