Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-01282/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-01282-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Rosanne Campbell
Defendant
Dudley Jackline
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DUDLEY JACKLINE,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-06-1282 MCE DAD P

vs.

ROSANNE CAMPBELL, et al., ORDER AND

Defendants. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

By order filed June 20, 2006, plaintiff was granted thirty days to submit the

$350.00 filing fee or an application to proceed in forma pauperis on the form provided with the

order. Plaintiff was cautioned that failure to comply with the court’s order would result in a

recommendation that this action be dismissed. The thirty day period has now expired, and

plaintiff has not paid the required filing fee, filed an in forma pauperis application, or responded

in any other way to the court’s order regarding the filing fee. The undersigned will therefore

recommend that this action be dismissed without prejudice.

On June 22, 2006, the court received plaintiff’s motion for leave to amend his

complaint. The pleading attached to the motion is incomplete. Plaintiff’s motion will be denied

without prejudice, and the incomplete pleading will be disregarded.

/////

Case 2:06-cv-01282-MCE -DAD Document 6 Filed 08/01/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s June 22, 2006 motion for

leave to amend his complaint is denied; and

IT IS RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice for

failure to submit the filing fee or a properly completed application to proceed in forma pauperis.

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty

days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written

objections with the court. A document containing objections should be titled “Objections to

Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file

objections within the specified time may, under certain circumstances, waive the right to appeal

the District Court’s order. See Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: July 31, 2006.

DAD:13:lg

jack1282.fifp

Case 2:06-cv-01282-MCE -DAD Document 6 Filed 08/01/06 Page 2 of 2