Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cr-00380/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cr-00380-2/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
USA
Plaintiff
Omar Ward
Defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

KEVIN V. RYAN (CASBN 118321)

United States Attorney

MARK KROTOSKI (CSBN 138549)

Chief, Criminal Division

BLAKE D. STAMM (CTBN 301887)

Assistant United States Attorney

450 Golden Gate Avenue, Box 36055

San Francisco, California 94102

Telephone: (415) 436-7210

Fax: (415) 436-7234

Attorneys for Plaintiff

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

OMAR WARD

 

Defendant.

 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CR 06 0380 SI

[PROPOSED] ORDER AND

STIPULATION FOR CONTINUANCE

FROM SEPTEMBER 1, 2006 TO

SEPTEMBER 22, 2006 AND

EXCLUDING TIME FROM THE SPEEDY

TRIAL ACT CALCULATION (18 U.S.C. §

3161(h)(8)(A))

With the agreement of the parties, and with the consent of the defendant, the Court enters

this order continuing a scheduling and trial setting appearance from September 1, 2006 to

September 22, 2006 at 11:00 A.M. before the Honorable Susan Illston, and documenting the

defendant’s exclusion of time under the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161(b), from September

1, 2006 to September 22, 2006. The parties agree, and the Court finds and holds, as follows:

1. On September 1, 2006, the parties appeared before this Court and the matter was

continued to September 22, 2006 for status and trial setting.

2. On that date, counsel for the defendant agreed to an exclusion of time of time under the

Speedy Trial Act for purposes of effective preparation.

3. Failure to grant the requested continuance would unreasonably deny the defendant

reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due

Case 3:06-cr-00380-SI Document 10 Filed 09/11/2006 Page 1 of 2
 Case 3:06-cr-00380-SI Document 11 Filed 09/13/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

diligence.

4. Given these circumstances, the Court finds that the ends of justice served by excluding the

period from September 1, 2006 to September 22, 2006, outweigh the best interest of the public

and the defendants in a speedy trial. § 3161(h)(8)(A).

5. Accordingly, and with the consent of the defendant, the Court orders that the period from

September 1, 2006 to September 22, 2006 be excluded from Speedy Trial Act calculations under

18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(A) & (B)(iv).

IT IS SO STIPULATED:

DATED: September 11, 2006 ______________/S/_________________

RONALD C. TYLER, ESQ.

Attorney for Defendant 

DATED: September 11, 2006 _____________/S/__________________

BLAKE D. STAMM 

Assistant United States Attorney

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: ______________ _______________________________

HON. SUSAN ILLSTON

United States District Judge

Case 3:06-cr-00380-SI Document 10 Filed 09/11/2006 Page 2 of 2
 Case 3:06-cr-00380-SI Document 11 Filed 09/13/06 Page 2 of 2