Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_14-cv-01177/USCOURTS-caed-1_14-cv-01177-6/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
R. Gonzales
Defendant
Jamar R. Hearns
Plaintiff
Olsen
Defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JAMAR R. HEARNS,

Plaintiff,

v.

R. GONZALES, et al.,

Defendants.

CASE NO. 1:14-cv-01177-DAD-MJS (PC)

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION 

FOR COURT ORDER

(ECF NO. 29) 

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this action 

pursuant 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On January 25, 2016, Plaintiff submitted necessary 

documents to effectuate service on Defendants Gonzales and Olsen. The Court 

thereafter directed the United States Marshal to serve these two Defendants. (ECF No. 

32.) Pending is Plaintiff’s motion for court order to serve Defendant Olsen. (ECF No. 29.) 

Because the Court’s most recent order has already accomplished that, Plaintiff’s motion 

will be denied.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motion for court order (ECF 

No. 29) is DENIED as moot.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 31, 2016 /s/Michael J. Seng 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:14-cv-01177-DAD-MJS Document 33 Filed 02/01/16 Page 1 of 1