Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-00541/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-00541-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Apple Inc.
Defendant
Rothschild Storage Retrieval Innovations, LLC
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

United States District Court 

Northern District of Californi

a

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

ROTHSCHILD STORAGE RETRIEVAL 

INNOVATIONS, LLC, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

SONY MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS 

(U.S.A), INC., 

Defendant. 

Case No. 15-cv-00234-EDL 

Case No. 15-cv-00373-EDL 

Case No. 15-cv-00539-EDL 

Case No. 15-cv-00541-EDL 

ORDER ADMINISTRATIVELY 

TERMINATING PENDING MOTIONS 

ROTHSCHILD STORAGE RETRIEVAL 

INNOVATIONS, LLC, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

HTC CORP., et al., 

Defendants. 

ROTHSCHILD STORAGE RETRIEVAL 

INNOVATIONS, LLC, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO. LTD., et 

al. 

Defendants. 

ROTHSCHILD STORAGE RETRIEVAL 

INNOVATIONS, LLC, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

APPLE, INC. 

Defendant. 

Case 3:15-cv-00541-EDL Document 80 Filed 05/28/15 Page 1 of 2
2 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

United States District Court 

Northern District of Californi

a

On May 6, 2015, this Court stayed these four related patent infringement lawsuits brought 

by non-practicing entity Rothschild Storage Retrieval Innovations, LLC (“Rothschild”) against 

HTC Corporation (“HTC”), Sony Mobile Communications (USA) Inc. (“Sony”), Apple Inc. 

(“Apple”) and Samsung Electronics Co. (“Samsung”) pending inter partes review by the Patent 

Trial and Appeal Board of the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Motions for judgment 

on the pleadings were pending in three of the four cases at the time the stay was imposed. See 15-

cv-00234 Dkt. #74; 15-cv-00539 Dkt. # 76; 15-cv-00541 Dkt. # 71. These motions are hereby 

administratively terminated, and may be re-filed if appropriate when and if the stay is lifted. 

 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: May 28, 2015 

________________________ 

ELIZABETH D. LAPORTE 

United States Magistrate Judge 

Case 3:15-cv-00541-EDL Document 80 Filed 05/28/15 Page 2 of 2