Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_15-cv-04528/USCOURTS-cand-4_15-cv-04528-5/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Kindred Healthcare, Inc.
Defendant
Kindred Nursing Centers West, LLC
Defendant
Belencia Washington
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 1

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] FEDERAL

RULE OF EVIDENCE 502(d) ORDER Case No. 4:15-cv-04528-KAW

Daniel L. Feder (SBN 130867)

THE LAW OFFICES OF DANIEL FEDER 

332 Pine St., Ste .700 

San Francisco, CA 94104 

Tel.: (415) 391-9476 

Fax: (415) 391-9432 

E-mail: danfeder@pacbell.net

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

BELENCIA WASHINGTON 

Robert M. Pattison (State Bar No. 103528) 

JACKSON LEWIS P.C. 

50 California Street, 9th Floor 

San Francisco, California 94111-4615 

Telephone: (415) 394-9400 

Facsimile: (415) 394-9401 

E-mail: pattisonr@jacksonlewis.com

Attorneys for Defendants 

KINDRED HEALTHCARE, INC. and 

KINDRED NURSING CENTERS WEST, LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

BELENCIA WASHINGTON, an individual,

Plaintiff, 

v. 

KINDRED HEALTHCARE, INC., a 

Delaware Corporation; KINDRED NURSING 

CENTERS WEST, LLC, a limited liability 

Corporation, 

Defendants. 

Case No. 4:15-cv-04528-KAW

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

FEDERAL RULE OF EVIDENCE 502(d) 

ORDER 

Complaint Filed: 10/01/2015 

Trial Date: None Set 

/// 

/// 

/// 

/// 

///

Case 4:15-cv-04528-KAW Document 34 Filed 07/28/16 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 2

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] FEDERAL

RULE OF EVIDENCE 502(d) ORDER Case No. 4:15-cv-04528-KAW

To facilitate discovery in this matter, the parties respectfully request the Court enter the 

following order pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence 502(d): 

The production of privileged or work-product protected documents, electronically stored 

information (“ESI”) or other information, whether inadvertent or otherwise, is not a waiver of the 

privilege or protection from discovery in this case or in any other federal or state proceeding. This 

Order shall be interpreted to provide the maximum protection allowed by Federal Rule of 

Evidence 502(d). Nothing contained herein is intended to or shall serve to limit a party’s right to 

conduct a review of documents, ESI or information (including metadata) for relevance, 

responsiveness and/or segregation of privileged and/or protected information before production. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

Dated: July 28, 2016 THE LAW OFFICES OF DANIEL FEDER 

By: /s/ 

Daniel L. Feder 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

BELENCIA WASHINGTON 

Dated: July 28, 2016 JACKSON LEWIS P.C. 

By: /s/ 

Robert M. Pattison 

Attorneys for Defendants 

KINDRED HEALTHCARE SERVICES, 

INC. and KINDRED NURSING CENTERS 

WEST, LLC 

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: ________________, 2016 _______________________________ 

 Honorable Kandis A. Westmore 

 United States Magistrate Judge 

4848-0666-0405, v. 1

7/28

Case 4:15-cv-04528-KAW Document 34 Filed 07/28/16 Page 2 of 2