Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_10-cv-01398/USCOURTS-caed-2_10-cv-01398-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Kenneth H. Casner
Petitioner
Kathleen Dickinson
Respondent

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KENNETH H. CASNER,

Petitioner, No. CIV S-10-1398 DAD P

vs.

KATHLEEN DICKINSON, Warden, 

Respondent. ORDER

 /

Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of

habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. In his application, petitioner challenges a judgment

of conviction entered in the Tuolumne County Superior Court. Tuolumne County is part of the

Fresno Division of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. See

Local Rule 120(d). 

Pursuant to Local Rule 120(f), a civil action which has not been commenced in

the proper division of a court may, on the court’s own motion, be transferred to the proper

division of the court. Therefore, this action will be transferred to the Fresno Division of the

court. 

/////

/////

Case 2:10-cv-01398-DAD Document 3 Filed 06/15/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. This action is transferred to the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of California sitting in Fresno; and

2. All future filings shall reference the new Fresno case number assigned and

shall be filed at:

United States District Court

Eastern District of California

2500 Tulare Street

Fresno, CA 93721

DATED: June 14, 2010.

DAD:mp:sj

casn1398.109

Case 2:10-cv-01398-DAD Document 3 Filed 06/15/10 Page 2 of 2