Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_11-cv-02131/USCOURTS-caed-1_11-cv-02131-2/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Patrick Moye
Petitioner
H. A. Rios, Jr.
Respondent

Document Text:

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Petitioner is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma 

pauperis with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 

U.S.C. § 2241. The matter was referred to the Magistrate Judge 

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Local Rules 302 through 304. 

On March 30, 2015, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and 

recommendations to deny the petition for writ of habeas corpus, 

direct the entry of judgment for Respondent, and decline to issue a 

certificate of appealability. The findings and recommendations were 

served on all parties on the same date. The findings and 

recommendations advised the parties that objections could be filed 

within thirty days and replies within fourteen days after the filing 

PATRICK MOYE,

 Petitioner,

v.

H. A. RIOS, Jr.,

Respondent.

Case No. 1:11-cv-02131-AWI-SKO-HC

ORDER RE: FINDINGS AND 

RECOMMENDATIONS (DOC. 23)

ORDER DENYING THE PETITION FOR WRIT 

OF HABEAS CORPUS (DOC. 1) AND

DIRECTING THE ENTRY OF JUDGMENT 

FOR RESPONDENT

ORDER DECLINING TO ISSUE A 

CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY

Case 1:11-cv-02131-AWI-SKO Document 24 Filed 05/21/15 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

of objections. Although the thirty-day period for the filing of 

objections has passed, no objections have been filed.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), 

this Court has conducted a de novo review of the case. Having 

carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds that the report 

and recommendations are supported by the record and proper analysis. 

Thus, the Court will adopt the findings and recommendations in full.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that:

1) The petition for writ of habeas corpus is DENIED; and 

2) The Clerk is DIRECTED to enter judgment for Respondent; and 

3) The Court DECLINES to issue a certificate of appealability.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 20, 2015 

 SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:11-cv-02131-AWI-SKO Document 24 Filed 05/21/15 Page 2 of 2