Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-00709/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-00709-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Commissioner of Social Security
Defendant
Marylou Garcia
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MARYLOU GARCIA,

Plaintiff,

vs.

MICHAEL J. ASTRUE,

Commissioner of Social

Security,

Defendant. 

 /

1:06-cv-00709-LJO-SMS

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATION (Doc. 22)

ORDER DENYING COMPLAINT

(Doc. 2)

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO ENTER

JUDGMENT FOR DEFENDANT AND

AGAINST PLAINTIFF

Plaintiff is represented by counsel and is proceeding in

forma pauperis with an action seeking judicial review of a final

decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying

plaintiff’s application for disability insurance benefits and

supplemental security income benefits under Titles II and XVI of

the Social Security Act. The matter was referred to the United

States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Local

Rule 72-302(c)(15).

On November 29, 2007, the Magistrate Judge filed Findings

and a Recommendation herein which were served on the parties and

which contained notice to the parties that any objections to the

Case 1:06-cv-00709-LJO -SMS Document 24 Filed 01/08/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Findings and Recommendation were to be filed within thirty (30)

days. To date, the parties have not filed objections to the

Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendation.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C.

§ 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 73-305, this Court has conducted a

de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the

entire file, the Court finds the Findings and Recommendation to

be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendation, filed November 29,

2007, are ADOPTED IN FULL;

2. Plaintiff’s social security complaint, filed June 7,

2006, is DENIED; and,

3. The Clerk of Court enter judgment for defendant and

against plaintiff and to close this action.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 3, 2008 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill 

66h44d UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-00709-LJO -SMS Document 24 Filed 01/08/08 Page 2 of 2