Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_13-cv-01519/USCOURTS-caed-2_13-cv-01519-2/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Scott Johnson
Plaintiff
Karim Mehrabi
Defendant

Document Text:

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SCOTT JOHNSON, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

KARIM MEHRABI, and DOES 1-10, 

Defendants. 

No. 2:13-cv-1519-KJM-EFB 

ORDER 

Plaintiff’s motion for default judgment came on regularly for hearing before the 

magistrate judge on September 3, 2014. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate 

Judge as provided by Local Rule 302(c)(19) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). 

 On January 14, 2015, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which 

contained notice to the parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be 

filed within fourteen days. No objections were filed. 

 The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 

F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. 

See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). Having reviewed 

the file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by 

the proper analysis. 

///// 

Case 2:13-cv-01519-KJM-DB Document 18 Filed 03/16/15 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2

 At the time of the hearing before the magistrate judge, counsel for defendant represented 

that the parties had reached a stipulation to withdraw plaintiff’s motion for default judgment. 

Findings and Recommendations at 6, ECF No. 16. The parties have not filed that stipulation. 

The magistrate judge recommends the motion be denied and that will be the order of the court. 

Defendant Mehrabi’s default, ECF No. 13, has not been set aside. Good cause appearing, 

defendant will be directed to file, within fifteen days, either a stipulation to set aside the July 3, 

2014 entry of default, ECF No. 13, and an answer to the complaint or a motion to set aside the 

default accompanied by a proposed answer. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 

 1. The Findings and Recommendations filed January 14, 2015, are adopted in full; 

 2. Plaintiff’s motion for default judgment, ECF No. 14, is denied; and 

 3. Within fifteen days from the date of this order defendant shall file either a stipulation 

to set aside the July 3, 2014 entry of default and an answer to the complaint or a motion to set 

aside the July 3, 2014 entry of default accompanied by a proposed answer to the complaint. 

DATED: March 13, 2015. 

Case 2:13-cv-01519-KJM-DB Document 18 Filed 03/16/15 Page 2 of 2