Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01330/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01330-4/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Alison Stirm
Plaintiff
United States of America
Defendant

Document Text:

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING EXPERT DISCOVERY 

DEADLINES; CASE NO.: 2:22-CV-01330-CKD

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

♼

LAW OFFICES

COTCHETT, PITRE &

MCCARTHY, LLP

FRANK M. PITRE (SBN 100077)

fpitre@cpmlegal.com

JOHN P. THYKEN (SBN 286598)

jthyken@cpmlegal.com

ANDREW W. BRITTON (SBN 340052)

abritton@cpmlegal.com

COTCHETT, PITRE & McCARTHY, LLP

840 Malcolm Road

Burlingame, California 94010

Telephone: (650) 697-6000

Facsimile: (650) 697-0577

Attorneys for Plaintiff

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ALISON STIRM, an individual, 

Plaintiff, 

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, and DOES 

1-10, inclusive,

Defendants.

Case No.: 2:22-CV-01330-CKD

JOINT STIPULATION AND 

[PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING 

EXPERT DISCOVERY DEADLINES

Judge: Hon. Carolyn K. Delaney

Courtroom: 24

Location: Robert T. Matsui U.S. Courthouse 501 I Street Sacramento, CA 95814 Courtroom 24, 8th Floor

Case 2:22-cv-01330-CKD Document 20 Filed 11/27/23 Page 1 of 3
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING EXPERT DISCOVERY 

DEADLINES; CASE NO.: 2:22-CV-01330-CKD

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

♼

LAW OFFICES

COTCHETT, PITRE &

MCCARTHY, LLP

Plaintiff Alison Stirm and Defendant United States of America jointly stipulate and 

respectfully request that the Court extend the current deadlines for expert discovery in the abovecaptioned matter by approximately 30 days as set forth in the table below. Good cause for the 

request exists because certain expert witnesses have informed counsel for plaintiffs that they require 

the additional time to complete their evaluation and to prepare their written opinions. No party will 

be prejudiced by the additional time, which is modest in duration, and is intended to assist the 

parties in obtaining all information necessary to resolve the case.

Accordingly, the parties jointly request that the Court modify the schedule as follows, with 

all other provisions of the Court’s Pretrial Scheduling Order (Dkt. 12) to remain in effect.

Deadline for parties to disclose experts on issues for 

which they have burden of proof

January 8, 2024

Deadline for parties to disclose experts on issues for 

which they do not have the burden of proof

February 20, 2024

Deadline for rebuttal expert reports, if any March 19, 2024

Expert discovery completion deadline May 14, 2024

Non-discovery law and motion deadline June 28, 2024

Dated: November 21, 2023 COTCHETT, PITRE & McCARTHY, LLP

By: /s/ Andrew W. Britton

ANDREW W. BRITTON

Attorneys for Plaintiff

Dated: November 21, 2023 PHILLIP A. TALBERT

United States Attorney

By: /s/ Philip A. Scarborough

(as authorized on 11/21/23)

PHILIP A. SCARBOROUGH

Assistant United States Attorney

Case 2:22-cv-01330-CKD Document 20 Filed 11/27/23 Page 2 of 3
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING EXPERT DISCOVERY 

DEADLINES; CASE NO.: 2:22-CV-01330-CKD

2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

♼

LAW OFFICES

COTCHETT, PITRE &

MCCARTHY, LLP

[PROPOSED] ORDER

The parties’ stipulation and request is GRANTED. The parties shall comply with the 

schedule set forth in their stipulation.

Dated: November 27, 2023

8

Stirm22cv1330.stip.dso2

_____________________________________

CAROLYN K. DELANEY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:22-cv-01330-CKD Document 20 Filed 11/27/23 Page 3 of 3