Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-01534/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-01534-2/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Kathryn Hood
Plaintiff
Housing Authority of the County of Sacramento, Sacramento Housing and Redevelopment Agency
Defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KATHRYN HOOD,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-06-1534 MCE EFB PS

vs.

HOUSING AUTHORITY OF

THE COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO,

SACRAMENTO HOUSING AND

REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY,

Defendants. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

On August 8, 2006, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed with thirty days leave to file an

amended complaint. On September 27, 2006, when plaintiff failed to file an amended complaint

within the allotted time, the court issued findings and a recommendation for dismissal of the

action. On October 5, 2006, plaintiff filed objections to the findings and recommendation and 

requested an extension of time. In light of that filing, on November 9, 2006, the undersigned

vacated the findings and recommendation and granted plaintiff one final thirty day extension of

time within which to file her amended complaint. That thirty day period has now expired, and

plaintiff has, once again, failed to file an amended complaint or otherwise respond to the court’s

order.

////

Case 2:06-cv-01534-MCE -EFB Document 8 Filed 12/27/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without

prejudice. See Local Rule 11-110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty days

after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written

objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned

“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Failure to file objections

within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Turner v.

Duncan, 158 F.3d 449, 455 (9th Cir. 1998); Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153, 1157 (9th Cir.

1991).

DATED: December 26, 2006.

Case 2:06-cv-01534-MCE -EFB Document 8 Filed 12/27/06 Page 2 of 2