Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-02838/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-02838-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Collabrx, Inc.
Plaintiff
The Jackson Laboratory
Defendant

Document Text:

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE 

INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 

Case No. 3:16-cv-02838-EMC 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Jeffrey W. Shopoff (Bar No. 46278)

Gregory S. Cavallo (Bar No. 173270) 

James M. Robinson (Bar No. 238063) 

SHOPOFF CAVALLO & KIRSCH LLP 

601 Montgomery Street, Suite 1110 

San Francisco, CA 94111 

Telephone: (415) 984-1975 

Facsimile: (415) 984-1978 

Attorneys for Plaintiff, 

COLLABRX, INC. 

Andrew N. Thomases (Bar No. 177339)

Henry Y. Huang (Bar No. 252832) 

ROPES & GRAY LLP 

1900 University Avenue, 6th Floor

East Palo Alto, CA 94303-2284

Tel: (650) 617-4000 

Fax: (650) 617-4090 

Christine Ezzell Singer (pro hac vice)

ROPES & GRAY LLP 

1211 Avenue of the Americas 

New York, NY 10036 

Tel: (212) 596-9208 

Fax: (212) 596-9090 

Attorneys for Defendant, 

THE JACKSON LABORATORY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

COLLABRX, INC., a Delaware corporation, 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

THE JACKSON LABORATORY, a Maine 

non-profit corporation, 

 Defendant. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 3:16-cv-02838-EMC 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER TO CONTINUE INITIAL CASE 

MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 

Case 3:16-cv-02838-EMC Document 38 Filed 09/15/16 Page 1 of 3
1

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE 

INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 

Case No. 3:16-cv-02838-EMC 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION 

Plaintiff CollabRx, Inc. (“CollabRx”) and Defendant The Jackson Laboratory (“JAX”), 

through their counsel, hereby stipulate and agree that:

WHEREAS, at the July 28, 2016 hearing, the Court ordered CollabRx to file an 

amended complaint within 30 days (August 29, 2016) and asked that the parties meet and confer 

regarding the merits of the case; 

WHEREAS, the parties began meeting and conferring immediately after the July 28 

hearing and continue to do so; 

WHEREAS, on August 29, 2016, CollabRx filed its First Amended Complaint; 

WHEREAS, as part of the meet and confer process, the parties have agreed to conduct 

an informal Rule 408 exchange of information on September 23, 2016, with the possibility of 

future meetings regarding the parties’ dispute;

WHEREAS, the parties have agreed to extend the time for JAX to respond to the First 

Amended Complaint (currently September 15, 2016), the initial case management conference 

(currently November 3, 2016), and corresponding pretrial and discovery deadlines, to allow time 

for the parties to review exchanged information and further evaluate the litigation; and 

WHEREAS, one prior time modification has been requested and entered in this case 

(ECF Nos. 18, 19), no case schedule has been entered, and the parties’ agreed time 

modifications would not affect any case schedule other than continuing the initial case 

management conference; 

NOW, THEREFORE, the parties, through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate, 

subject to the Court’s approval, that JAX’s deadline to answer or otherwise respond to the First 

Amended Complaint be extended to October 28, 2016, and the initial case management 

conference be continued to December 8, 2016. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

Case 3:16-cv-02838-EMC Document 38 Filed 09/15/16 Page 2 of 3
2

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE 

INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 

Case No. 3:16-cv-02838-EMC 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Dated: September 9, 2016 By /s/ Gregory S. Cavallo

Gregory S. Cavallo 

SHOPOFF CAVALLO & KIRSCH LLP 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

COLLABRX, INC. 

/s/ Andrew Thomases

Andrew Thomases 

ROPES & GRAY LLP 

Attorneys for Defendant 

THE JACKSON LABORATORY

In accordance with Local Rule 5-1, the filer of this document hereby attests that the 

concurrence to the filing of this document has been obtained from the other signatories hereto. 

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: __________________________ _______________________________ 

 Edward M. Chen 

 United States District Judge 

09/15/2016

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Judge Edward M. Chen

Case 3:16-cv-02838-EMC Document 38 Filed 09/15/16 Page 3 of 3