Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca5-14-41011/USCOURTS-ca5-14-41011-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Juan Ademo-Miranda
Appellant
United States of America
Appellee

Document Text:

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-41011

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JUAN ADEMO-MIRANDA, also known as Juan Enamorado, also known as 

Carlos Gonzalez, also known as Jose Castillo Cruz,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:14-CR-9

Before JOLLY, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Juan AdemoMiranda has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed briefs in accordance 

with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 

F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Ademo-Miranda has not filed a response. We have 

reviewed counsel’s briefs and the relevant portions of the record reflected 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

March 31, 2016

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 14-41011 Document: 00513445867 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/31/2016
No. 14-41011

2

therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no 

nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. However, the district court committed 

nonreversible error when it categorized Ademo-Miranda’s Texas offense of 

aggravated assault with a deadly weapon, which resulted in a sentence of 

deferred adjudication, as an aggravated felony for purposes of 8 U.S.C. 

§ 1326(b)(2). The judgment of the district court is therefore REFORMED to 

show that Ademo-Miranda was convicted and sentenced under 8 U.S.C. 

§ 1326(b)(1). See United States v. Mondragon-Santiago, 564 F.3d 357, 367-69 

(5th Cir. 2009). Counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel 

is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS 

DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 14-41011 Document: 00513445867 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/31/2016