Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-03590/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-03590-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Google Inc.
Defendant
Susan Harvey
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 -1-

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER 

No. 13-CV-03900-EMC 

LEGAL127422118.1 

Susan D. Fahringer (CA Bar No. 162978)

SFahringer@perkinscoie.com 

PERKINS COIE LLP 

1201 Third Avenue, Suite 4900 

Seattle, WA 98101-3099 

Telephone: (206) 359-8000 

Facsimile: (206) 359-9000 

Sunita B Bali (CA Bar No. 274108) 

SBali@perkinscoie.com 

PERKINS COIE LLP 

4 Embarcadero Center, Suite 2400 

San Francisco, CA 94111 

Telephone: (415) 344-7000 

Facsimile: (415) 344-7050 

Attorneys for Defendants 

Google Inc. and Google Payment Corporation

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN JOSE DIVISION 

SUSAN HARVEY, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

GOOGLE INC., 

Defendants. 

Case No. 15-CV-03590-EMC 

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER 

ALLOWING PLAINTIFF TO AMEND 

COMPLAINT AND EXTENDING 

DEADLINE FOR DEFENDANTS’ 

RESPONSE THERETO 

Pursuant to Local Rule 7-12, it is stipulated between Plaintiff Susan Harvey and 

Defendant Google Inc. by their respective attorneys: 

1. WHEREAS, on April 15, 2015, Plaintiff filed in her Complaint in the Eastern 

District of California, see Dkt. No. 1; 

2. WHEREAS, on June 25, 2015, Defendant filed a Motion to Transfer or Dismiss, 

seeking to transfer this matter to the Northern District of California or, alternatively, dismiss the 

action, see Dkt. No. 10; 

Case 3:15-cv-03590-EMC Document 26 Filed 09/21/15 Page 1 of 5
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 -2-

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER 

No. 13-CV-03900-EMC 

LEGAL127422118.1 

3. WHEREAS, on August 4, 2015, pursuant to a stipulation by the parties, the 

Eastern District of California entered an order transferring this action to this Court, see Dkt. 

No. 20; 

4. WHEREAS, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a)(2), Defendant has 

agreed to allow Plaintiff to amend her Complaint; 

5. WHEREAS, pursuant to Local Rule 6-1(b), the parties have agreed to extend the 

time within which Defendant must answer or respond to Plaintiff’s amended complaint; 

6. WHEREAS, the parties do not believe that this extension will alter any currently 

existing deadlines or the current case schedule; 

7. By entering into this Stipulation, Defendant does not waive any defenses, rights, or 

privileges. 

THEREFORE, the Parties hereby stipulate and agree to the following: 

1. Plaintiff may file an amended complaint on or before September 30, 2015. 

2. Because this case has been transferred to this Court and because Plaintiff will file 

an amended complaint, Defendant withdraws its Motion to Transfer or Dismiss, Dkt. No. 20; 

3. Defendant’s deadline to respond to the Complaint, whether by answer, motion, or 

otherwise, shall be extended to October 30, 2015. 

Case 3:15-cv-03590-EMC Document 26 Filed 09/21/15 Page 2 of 5
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 -3-

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER 

No. 13-CV-03900-EMC 

LEGAL127422118.1 

DATED: September 17, 2015 PERKINS COIE LLP 

By: s/ Susan D. Fahringer 

Susan D. Fahringer, Bar No. 162978 

SFahringer@perkinscoie.com

Sunita B. Bali, Bar No. 274108 

SBali@perkinscoie.com

Attorneys for Defendant Google Inc. 

DATED: September 17, 2015 LAW OFFICES OF TODD M. 

FRIEDMAN, P.C. 

By: /s/ Suren N. Weerasuriya 

Suren N. Weerasuriya, Cal. Bar No. 

278521 

Attorneys for Susan Harvey 

 

Case 3:15-cv-03590-EMC Document 26 Filed 09/21/15 Page 3 of 5
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 -4-

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER 

No. 13-CV-03900-EMC 

LEGAL127422118.1 

Local Rule 5-1(i) Attestation 

 I, Susan D. Fahringer, hereby attest, pursuant to N.D. Cal. Local Rule5-1(i), that the 

concurrence to the filing of this document has been obtained from each signatory hereto. 

DATED: September 17, 2015 PERKINS COIE LLP

By: s/ Susan D. Fahringer 

Susan D. Fahringer, Bar No. 162978 

SFahringer@perkinscoie.com

Attorneys for Defendant Google Inc. 

 

Case 3:15-cv-03590-EMC Document 26 Filed 09/21/15 Page 4 of 5
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 -5-

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER 

No. 13-CV-03900-EMC 

LEGAL127422118.1 

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

 PURSUANT TO THE FOREGOING STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. Plaintiff 

shall file an amended complaint on or before September 30, 2015. Defendant’s deadline to 

respond to the Complaint, whether by answer, motion, or otherwise, shall be extended to 

October 30, 2015. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: ____________________ __________________________________ 

 Hon. Edward M. Chen 

 United States District Judge 

9/21/15

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Edward M. Chen

Case 3:15-cv-03590-EMC Document 26 Filed 09/21/15 Page 5 of 5