Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-mc-80010/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-mc-80010-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Echostar Technologies Corporation
Plaintiff
Humax USA, Inc.
Defendant
Seagate Technology, Inc.
Miscellaneous
TiVo Inc.
Defendant

Document Text:

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING ECHOSTAR TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION’S MOTION TO COMPEL 

SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY, INC.’S COMPLIANCE WITH SUBPOENA: CASE NO. MISC 06-80010 MHP (EDL) 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

TAYLOR & CO. 

LAW OFFICES, INC. 

STEPHEN E. TAYLOR (SBN 58452) 

TYLER G. NEWBY (SBN 205790) 

TAYLOR & COMPANY LAW OFFICES, INC. 

One Ferry Building, Suite 355 

San Francisco, California 94111 

Telephone: (415) 788-8200 

Facsimile: (415) 788-8208 

E-mail: staylor@tcolaw.com 

E-mail: tnewby@tcolaw.com 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

ECHOSTAR TECHNOLOGIES 

CORPORATION 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

IN RE SUBPOENA ISSUED TO 

SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY, INC. 

Case No.: Misc 06-80010 MHP (EDL) 

E.D. Texas Case No. 5:05-CV-81-DF-CMC 

ECHOSTAR TECHNOLOGIES 

CORPORATION, a Texas corporation, 

 Plaintiff, 

v. 

TIVO INC., a Delaware corporation, and 

HUMAX USA, INC., a Delaware corporation, 

 Defendants. 

AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIM. 

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING 

ECHOSTAR TECHNOLOGIES 

CORPORATION’S MOTION TO 

COMPEL SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY, 

INC.’S COMPLIANCE WITH SUBPOENA

Date: March 7, 2006 

Time: 9:00 a.m. 

Place: Courtroom E, 15th Floor 

 Honorable Elizabeth D. Laporte 

Case 3:06-mc-80010-MHP Document 16 Filed 03/10/06 Page 1 of 4
 1. 

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING ECHOSTAR TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION’S MOTION TO COMPEL 

SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY, INC.’S COMPLIANCE WITH SUBPOENA: CASE NO. MISC 06-80010 MHP (EDL) 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

TAYLOR & CO. 

LAW OFFICES, INC. 

The motion by plaintiff and counter-defendant EchoStar Technologies Corporation to compel 

Seagate Technology Inc.’s compliance with a subpoena (“Motion”) in the above-captioned action 

came on regularly for hearing on March 7, 2006. All parties appeared and were represented at the 

hearing by and through their respective counsel of record. 

Having considered all papers filed by the parties in favor of and in opposition to the Motion, 

the arguments of counsel appearing at the hearing on this matter, and all other matters deemed to be 

appropriate by the Court, and good cause appearing therefore, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the EchoStar Technologies Corporation’s Motion to Compel 

Seagate Technology Inc.’s Compliance With Subpoena is GRANTED. No later than March 28, 2006, 

Seagate shall produce documents sufficient to show, for Seagate hard disk drive models 

ST3120025ACE, 9W6024-165, ST940019ACE, ST340019ACE, and ST380012ACE: 

1. The physical structure of the hard disk drive model, including any spindle motor, 

actuator, actuator arms, read and/or write heads, and transducers; 

2. How the hard disk drive model is operated and controlled (including its seek and 

read/write functions); 

3. How the hard disk drive responds to a memory allocation instruction from the host or 

system controller; and 

4. The operation of the interface between the hard disk drive and the host or system 

controller. 

Seagate shall make a company representative available for deposition pursuant to Fed. R. 

Civ. P. 30(b)(6) no later than April 28, 2006. 

DATED: _______________________ _______________________________________ 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 

March 10, 2006

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte

Case 3:06-mc-80010-MHP Document 16 Filed 03/10/06 Page 2 of 4
 2. 

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING ECHOSTAR TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION’S MOTION TO COMPEL 

SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY, INC.’S COMPLIANCE WITH SUBPOENA: CASE NO. MISC 06-80010 MHP (EDL) 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

TAYLOR & CO. 

LAW OFFICES, INC. 

PROOF OF SERVICE

I, GRACE D. FRARY, declare as follows: 

1. I am employed in the County of San Francisco, State of California. I am over the age of 

18 and not a party to the within action. My business address is Taylor & Company Law Offices, Inc., 

One Ferry Building, Suite 355, San Francisco, California 94111. 

2. On March 7, 2006, I served a true and correct copy of the following document(s) 

described as: 

(A) [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING ECHOSTAR TECHNOLOGIES 

CORPORATION’S MOTION TO COMPEL SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY, INC.’S 

COMPLIANCE WITH SUBPOENA 

on the following interested parties in this action: 

Mr. Morgan Chu 

Irell & Manella LLP

1800 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 900 

Los Angeles, CA 90067-4276 

Telephone: (310) 277-1010 

Facsimile: (310) 203-7199 

Counsel for TiVo Inc. 

and HUMAX USA, Inc. 

Mr. Samuel F. Baxter 

McKool Smith, P.C. 

300 Crescent Court, Suite 1500 

Dallas, TX 75201 

Telephone: (214) 978-4000 

Facsimile: (214) 978-4044 

Counsel for TiVo Inc. 

and HUMAX USA, Inc. 

Mr. Harold J. McElhinny 

Morrison & Foerster LLP 

425 Market Street 

San Francisco, CA 94105-2482 

Telephone: (415) 268-7000 

Facsimile: (415) 268-7522

Counsel for EchoStar 

Technologies Corporation 

[ X ] [BY U.S. MAIL] I caused the foregoing document(s) to be enclosed in a sealed 

envelope, with first class postage fully paid, for delivery on the individuals identified above as 

indicated herein. I am “readily familiar” with the firm’s practice of collection and processing 

correspondence for mailing and know that, in the ordinary course of Taylor & Company Law Offices, 

Inc.’s business practice, the document(s) described above would be deposited with the United States 

Case 3:06-mc-80010-MHP Document 16 Filed 03/10/06 Page 3 of 4
 3. 

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING ECHOSTAR TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION’S MOTION TO COMPEL 

SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY, INC.’S COMPLIANCE WITH SUBPOENA: CASE NO. MISC 06-80010 MHP (EDL) 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

TAYLOR & CO. 

LAW OFFICES, INC. 

Postal Service on that same day at San Francisco, California, in the ordinary course of business. I am 

aware that on motion of the party served, service is presumed to be invalid if the postal cancellation 

date, or postage meter date, is more than one day after the date of deposit for mailing set forth in this 

declaration. 

[ ] [BY FACSIMILE] I caused the foregoing document(s) to be transmitted by facsimile 

to the offices of the addressees indicated below at the facsimile numbers listed for each addressee 

served. Upon completion of said facsimile transmission, the transmitting machine issued a 

transmission report showing that the transmission was complete and without error.

[ ] [BY OVERNIGHT DELIVERY] I caused delivery of the document(s) listed above to 

be effected by overnight mail, by placing true and correct copies in separate envelopes for each 

addressee shown above, with the name and address of the person served shown on the envelope, and 

by sealing the envelope and placing it for collection. Delivery fees were paid or provided for in 

accordance with the ordinary business practices of Taylor & Company Law Offices, Inc. 

[ ] [BY PERSONAL SERVICE] I caused the foregoing document(s) to be served by 

hand on the following individual(s) as indicated on the “Declaration of Personal Service” attached 

hereto as Exhibit A. The person who delivered a true and correct copy of such document(s) to the 

person(s) identified below is identified in Exhibit A attached hereto: 

I declare under penalty of perjury, under the laws of the United States of America, that the 

foregoing is true and correct. Executed this 7th day of March 2006, at San Francisco, California. 

 /s/ Grace D. Frary 

 Grace D. Frary 

Case 3:06-mc-80010-MHP Document 16 Filed 03/10/06 Page 4 of 4