Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_14-cv-01564/USCOURTS-caed-1_14-cv-01564-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Commissioner of Social Security
Defendant
Israel Rivera
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

KELSEY BROWN, CA #263109

Dellert Baird Law Offices, PLLC

PO Box 3757

Silverdale, WA 98383

Phone: (360) 329-6968

Fax: (360) 329-6968

Email: Dellert.Law.Office@gmail.com

Attorney for Plaintiff

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

FRESNO DIVISION

ISRAEL RIVERA,

 Plaintiff,

 vs.

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY

 Defendant.

Case # 1:14-CV-01564-BAM

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR

EXTENSION OF TIME

The parties hereby stipulate by counsel, that Plaintiff shall have a second extension of 

time to file Plaintiff’s opening brief, in accordance with the scheduling order.

Counsel for the Plaintiff has been ill and unable to complete the scheduled briefing. 

Counsel is a solo practitioner and has no additional attorneys to help with this caseload at this 

time. As a result, counsel for Plaintiff requires additional time to draft the opening brief. Plaintiff 

requests an extension of time to August 18, 2015.

The parties stipulate that the Court’s Scheduling Order shall be modified accordingly.

Dated August 17, 2015: /s/ Kelsey M Brown

Case 1:14-cv-01564-BAM Document 15 Filed 08/28/15 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

KELSEY MACKENZIE BROWN CA #263109

Dellert Baird Law Offices, PLLC

PO Box 3757

Silverdale, WA 98383

(360) 329-6968

Attorney for Plaintiff

Dated August 17, 2015: s/ KELSEY M. BROWN for Michael Marriott

MICHAEL MARRIOTT

(per e-mail authorization)

Special Assistant U.S. Attorney

Office of the General Counsel

Of Attorneys for Defendant

ORDER

The Court has reviewed this agreement and adopts the stipulation. However, Plaintiff’s 

counsel is advised that further stipulations or motions for extensions of time will be subject to 

greater scrutiny. This is Plaintiff’s second extension of time and it is brought well after the 

motion deadline. Extensions of time brought on or after the required filing date are looked upon 

with disfavor. L.R. 144(d). Counsel is warned that any additional request for an extension of 

time must be timely, supported by good cause, or it will be denied. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 27, 2015 /s/ Barbara A. McAuliffe _

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:14-cv-01564-BAM Document 15 Filed 08/28/15 Page 2 of 2