Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_03-cv-00604/USCOURTS-caed-2_03-cv-00604-20/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Michael Huftile
Plaintiff
Jack Vognsen
Defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26 ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S PENDING MOTIONS - 1

2:03-CV-0604-RRB-JFM-P

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

No. 2:03-CV-0604-RRB-JFM-P

ORDER

Plaintiff Michael Huftile (“Plaintiff”), a state prisoner

filing pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief

under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States

Magistrate Judge, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local

General Order No. 262.

On February 27, 2007, Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds

filed Findings & Recommendations (Docket 46) and Amended Findings

and Recommendations (Docket 45) herein, which were served on all

parties and which contained notice to all parties that any

objections to the same were to be filed within twenty days.

Plaintiff has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

MICHAEL HUFTILE,

Plaintiff,

vs.

JACK VOGNSEN,

Defendant.

Case 2:03-cv-00604-RRB -JFM Document 59 Filed 06/29/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26 ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S PENDING MOTIONS - 2

2:03-CV-0604-RRB-JFM-P

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. §

636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 72-304, the Court has conducted a de

novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire

file, the Court finds the findings and recommendations to be

supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations at Docket 46, filed

on February 27, 2007, are adopted in full; 

2. The Amended Findings & Recommendations at Docket 45,

filed on February 27, 2007, are adopted in full;

3. Plaintiff’s Motion for Protective Order at Docket

44, filed on February 5, 2007, is DENIED; and

4. Plaintiff’s Motion to Reinstate Declaratory Relief

and Damages at Docket 29, filed on September 14, 2006, is DENIED.

ENTERED this 29th day of June, 2007.

S/RALPH R. BEISTLINE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:03-cv-00604-RRB -JFM Document 59 Filed 06/29/07 Page 2 of 2