Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-01592/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-01592-2/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Leonard Hadley
Plaintiff
State of California
Defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LEONARD HADLEY,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-07-1592 FCD EFB P

vs.

STATE OF CALIFORNIA, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Defendant.

 /

Plaintiff is a prisoner, without counsel, suing for alleged civil rights violations. See 42

U.S.C. § 1983. On November 29, 2007, the court dismissed plaintiff’s complaint for failure to

state a cognizable claim against the defendant. The dismissal order explained the complaint’s

deficiencies, gave plaintiff 30 days to file an amended complaint correcting those deficiencies,

and warned plaintiff that failure to file an amended complaint would result in a recommendation

that this action be dismissed for failure to state a claim. 

The 30-day period has expired and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or

otherwise responded to the court’s order.

Accordingly, it is hereby RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed for failure to

state a claim. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A; 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).

////

Case 2:07-cv-01592-FCD-EFB Document 6 Filed 01/30/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty days

after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written

objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned

“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Failure to file objections

within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Turner v.

Duncan, 158 F.3d 449, 455 (9th Cir. 1998); Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

Dated: January 30, 2008.

Case 2:07-cv-01592-FCD-EFB Document 6 Filed 01/30/08 Page 2 of 2