Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-03291/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-03291-22/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Steven Daniel
Defendant
Resect Medical , Inc.
Defendant
Rita Medical Systems, Inc.
Plaintiff

Document Text:

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

G:\WHAALL\2005Civ\05-03291 Rite Med\question re mils.wpd

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RITA MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC.,

Plaintiff,

 v.

RESECT MEDICAL , INC., and STEVEN

DANIEL,

Defendants. /

No. C 05-03291 WHA

FURTHER QUESTION RE

MOTIONS IN LIMINE

Please also address the following issue at the final pretrial conference. Assuming that

Daniel was obligated to assign his interest in the patent application and the invention to Rita,

would Morris (and therefore Resect) still be a co-owner and therefore entitled to practice the

invention without a license?

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 19, 2007 WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:05-cv-03291-WHA Document 323 Filed 01/19/07 Page 1 of 1