Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cr-00687/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cr-00687-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Bruce Barker
Defendant
USA
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[PROP.] ORDER

CR 06 0687 WHA 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

BRUCE BARKER,

Defendant.

 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CR 06 0687 WHA

[PROPOSED] ORDER FINDING

EXCLUDABLE TIME

UNDER SPEEDY TRIAL ACT

18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(A)&(B)(iv)

The indictment in the above-captioned case was returned and filed on October 12,

2006. The defendant, Bruce Barker, made his initial appearance in the matter before the

Court on October 26, 2006. Assistant United States Attorney Susan Badger appeared on

behalf of the government. Cristina Arguedas appeared on behalf of the defendant, who

was present and out of custody. 

The Court arraigned the defendant and he entered not guilty pleas. The defendant

signed a $15,000 unsecured personal recognizance bond, and the Court advised him of his

Case 3:06-cr-00687-SI Document 3 Filed 10/27/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[PROP.] ORDER

CR 06 0687 WHA 2

duties and obligations pursuant to the bond. Defense counsel advised the Court that she

was in the process of filing a Notice of Related Case relating the instant case to the case

United States v. Marvin Washington, CR 02 0169 SI. The Court ordered the parties to

appear before United States District Judge William Alsup on November 7, 2006 for initial

appearance and settings.

The government moved for, and the defendant concurred in, a finding that the time

between October 26, 2006 and November 7, 2006 be excluded from the time

requirements of the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161, in order to provide reasonable

time to provide discovery and for effective preparation of counsel in reviewing the

discovery. In addition, the time exclusion should provide reasonable time for the Court to

review and make a determination on the Notice of Related Case. 18 U.S.C.

§ 3161(h)(8)(A) & (B)(iv).

Upon the request of the parties, and for good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY

ORDERED that the time from October 26, 2006 through November 7, 2006 is excluded

from the time requirements of the Speedy Trial Act in order to provide the government

reasonable time to provide discovery and to provide the defendant reasonable time for

effective preparation, taking into account due diligence. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(A) &

(B)(iv).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

 

ELIZABETH LAPORTE

United States Magistrate Judge

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte

Dated: October 27, 2006

Case 3:06-cr-00687-SI Document 3 Filed 10/27/06 Page 2 of 2