Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-16-01714/USCOURTS-ca4-16-01714-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Wellesley K. Clayton
Appellant
M&T Bank
Appellee
Allen Burton Shuford
Appellee

Document Text:

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-1714

In re: WELLESLEY K. CLAYTON,

------------------------------

WELLESLEY K. CLAYTON,

Debtor - Appellant,

v.

M&T BANK,

Creditor – Appellee,

and

A. BURTON SHUFORD,

Trustee – Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert J. Conrad, 

Jr., District Judge. (3:16-cv-00018-RJC; 15-30573)

Submitted: November 22, 2016 Decided: November 29, 2016

Before DIAZ and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Appeal: 16-1714 Doc: 22 Filed: 11/29/2016 Pg: 1 of 3
2

Wellesley K. Clayton, Appellant Pro Se. Lacey Meredith Moore, 

HUTCHENS LAW FIRM, Charlotte, North Carolina; Allen Burton 

Shuford, Mint Hill, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 16-1714 Doc: 22 Filed: 11/29/2016 Pg: 2 of 3
3

PER CURIAM:

Wellesley K. Clayton appeals the district court’s order 

denying his motion for reconsideration of a prior order

dismissing as untimely his appeal from the bankruptcy court. We 

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma 

pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district 

court. Clayton v. M&T Bank, Nos. 3:16-cv-00018-RJC; 15-30573

(W.D.N.C. May 24, 2016). We deny Clayton’s motion for 

appointment of counsel and we dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented 

in the materials before this court and argument would not aid 

the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Appeal: 16-1714 Doc: 22 Filed: 11/29/2016 Pg: 3 of 3