Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cr-00045/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cr-00045-5/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Peter Daniel Collins
Defendant
Daniel Ivan Porter
Defendant
USA
Plaintiff
Emily Katherine Weitzel
Defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

SCOTT N. SCHOOLS (SCSBN 9990)

United States Attorney

MARK L. KROTOSKI (CASBN 138549)

Chief, Criminal Division

ROBERT DAVID REES (CASBN 229441)

Assistant United States Attorney

450 Golden Gate Avenue, Box 36055

San Francisco, CA 94102

Telephone: (415) 436-7200

Facsimile: (415) 436-7234

Email: robert.rees@usdoj.gov

Attorneys for Plaintiff

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

PETER DANIEL COLLINS,

a/k/a John Hollins,

EMILY KATHERINE WEITZEL,

a/k/a Julie Andrews, and

DANIEL IVAN PORTER,

Defendants.

 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CR 07 0045 SI

[PROPOSED] ORDER AND

STIPULATION EXCLUDING TIME

FROM MARCH 23, 2007 TO MAY

11, 2007 FROM THE SPEEDY

TRIAL ACT CALCULATION 

(18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(A))

Defendants Peter Daniel Collins, Emily Katherine Weitzel, and Daniel Ivan Porter

appeared before the Court on March 23, 2007. With the agreement of the parties, and

with the consent of the defendants, the Court enters this order scheduling a motions

hearing on May 11, 2007 at 11:00A.M. before the Honorable Susan Illston, and

documenting the exclusion of time under the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. §

3161(h)(8)(A), from March 23, 2007 to May 11, 2007. The parties agreed, and the Court

found and held, as follows:

1. The defendants agreed to an exclusion of time under the Speedy Trial Act. 

Case 3:07-cr-00045-SI Document 38 Filed 05/11/2007 Page 1 of 2
 Case 3:07-cr-00045-SI Document 41 Filed 05/15/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Failure to grant the requested continuance would unreasonably deny defense counsel

reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of

due diligence. The case is also complex due to the nature of the prosecution such that it is

unreasonable to expect adequate preparation for pretrial proceedings or for the trial itself

within the time limits established by the Speedy Trial Act..

2. Given these circumstances, the Court found that the ends of justice served by

excluding the period from March 23, 2007 to May 11, 2007, outweigh the best interest of

the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. § 3161(h)(8)(A).

3. Accordingly, and with the consent of the defendant, the Court ordered that the

period from March 23, 2007 to May 11, 2007 be excluded from Speedy Trial Act

calculations under 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(A), (B)(ii), & (B)(iv).

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

DATED: May 11, 2007 __________/s______________________

ROBERT DAVID REES

Assistant United States Attorney

DATED: May 11, 2007 ___________/s_____________________

STEVEN KALAR, ESQ.

Attorney for Defendant Porter

DATED: May 11, 2007 _________/s (Robert Tayac for)______

BRIAN GETZ, ESQ.

Attorney for Defendant Weitzel

DATED: May 11, 2007 ___________/s_____________________

ANTHONY BRASS, ESQ.

Attorney for Defendant Collins

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED:_____________________ ________________________________

HON. SUSAN ILLSTON

United States District Judge

Case 3:07-cr-00045-SI Document 38 Filed 05/11/2007 Page 2 of 2
 Case 3:07-cr-00045-SI Document 41 Filed 05/15/07 Page 2 of 2