Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-00933/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-00933-4/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Eduardo Jaime
Petitioner
Jeanne Woodford
Respondent

Document Text:

1

 James E. Tilton, Secretary, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, substituted

for Jeanne Woodford, Director, CDC. Fed. R. Civ. P. 25(c).

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

EDUARDO JAIME,

Petitioner,

vs.

JAMES E. TILTON, Secretary, California

Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation,1

Respondent.

No. 2:05-cv-00933-JKS (HC)

FINAL JUDGMENT

The Court having entered its Memorandum Decision of even date herewith disposing of all

the issues raised in the petition,

IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED THAT the Petition Under 28 U.S.C.

§ 2254 for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT the Court declines to issue a Certificate of

Appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000) (a COA should

be granted where the applicant has made “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional

right,” i.e., when “reasonable jurists could debate whether (or, for that matter, agree that) the petition

should have been resolved in a different manner or that the issues presented were adequate to

deserve encouragement to proceed further” (internal quotation marks and citations omitted));

Hoffman v. Arave, 455 F.3d 926, 943 (9th Cir.2006) (same). All federal constitutional issues

properly raised in the petition were either addressed by the California Court of Appeal in its decision

or addressed by the Yolo County Superior Court in denying Petitioner’s petition for habeas relief

Case 2:05-cv-00933-JKS Document 19 Filed 11/30/07 Page 1 of 2
FINAL JUDGMENT

Jaime v. Tilton, 2:05-cv-00933-JKS (HC) 2

before that court and no reasonable jurist could find that those decisions were “objectively

unreasonable.”

Dated: November 30, 2007.

s/ James K. Singleton, Jr.

JAMES K. SINGLETON, JR.

United States District Judge

Case 2:05-cv-00933-JKS Document 19 Filed 11/30/07 Page 2 of 2