Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-03824/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-03824-14/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Apple Inc
Defendant
Uriel Marcus
Plaintiff
Benedict Verceles
Plaintiff

Document Text:

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

URIEL MARCUS, BENEDICT

VERCELES, and Others Similarly

Situated,

Plaintiff,

 v.

APPLE INC,

Defendant. /

No. C 14-03824 WHA

SUPPLEMENT TO ORDER RE

PLAINTIFFS’ DEPOSITIONS

The Court wishes to add that plaintiffs’ failure to attend their depositions by the April 3

deadline will result in an adverse inference. Apple is required to comply with the previous

order’s deadlines, regardless of whether plaintiffs sit for their depositions. If plaintiffs fail to sit

for their depositions by the deadline, they will forfeit their right to interpose testimony contrary

to the submissions by Apple. 

Plaintiffs’ counsel should not have waited until the eleventh hour to seek an extension

and has not shown good cause for a postponement. Nevertheless a postponement was granted

until April 3. No more extensions will be granted.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 27, 2015. 

WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:14-cv-03824-WHA Document 71 Filed 03/27/15 Page 1 of 1