Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca5-15-20724/USCOURTS-ca5-15-20724-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Carlos Trejo-Dominguez
Appellant
United States of America
Appellee

Document Text:

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-20724

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

CARLOS TREJO-DOMINGUEZ, also known as Carlos Dominguez Trejo, also 

known as Carlos Hernandez-Herrera,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:15-CR-365-1

Before KING, DENNIS, and COSTA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Carlos Trejo-Dominguez

raises an argument that is now foreclosed by United States v. GonzalezLongoria, 831 F.3d 670 (5th Cir. 2016) (en banc), petition for cert. filed (Sept. 

29, 2016) (No. 16-6259). Trejo also contends that the district court erred by 

entering judgment reflecting a conviction under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2), but the 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

December 15, 2016

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 15-20724 Document: 00513798330 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/15/2016
No. 15-20724

2

judgment actually reflects the appropriate conviction under § 1326(b)(1).

Accordingly, the government’s unopposed motion for summary affirmance is

GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. The 

government’s alternative motion for an extension of time to file a brief is 

DENIED as moot.

 Case: 15-20724 Document: 00513798330 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/15/2016