Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cr-00553/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cr-00553-2/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Lloyd Jamison
Defendant
USA
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER

CR 05-00553 VRW

KEVIN V. RYAN (CSBN 118321)

United States Attorney

EUMI L. CHOI (WVBN 0722)

Chief, Criminal Division

SUSAN R. JERICH (CSBN 188462)

Assistant United States Attorney

450 Golden Gate Avenue, Box 36055

San Francisco, California 94102

Telephone: (415) 436-7158

Facsimile: (415) 436-7234

Email: susan.jerich@usdoj.gov

Attorneys for Plaintiff

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) No.: CR 05-00553 VRW

)

Plaintiff, ) PARTIES’ STIPULATION AND

) [PROPOSED] ORDER EXCLUDING

v. ) TIME UNDER SPEEDY TRIAL ACT

)

LLOYD JAMISON, )

)

Defendant. )

____________________________________)

The parties stipulate and agree, and the Court finds and holds, as follows:

1. The parties appeared on the instant matter on November 1, 2005 for status or trial setting.

Counsel for the defendant requested that the Court set dates for the filing of pre-trial motions.

2. Accordingly, the Court set the following dates: December 6, 2005 for defendant’s filing of

Motion to Suppress evidence; December 20, 2005 for government’s Opposition to defendant’s

Motion to Suppress evidence and January 10, 2006 for defendant’s Reply brief. The Court set

January 31, 2006 as the date for hearing on defendant’s motion. 

3. Counsel for the defendant requested that the time between November 1, 2005 and January

31, 2006 be excluded based upon effective preparation and continuity of counsel.

4. In light of the foregoing facts, the failure to grant the requested exclusion would

Case 3:05-cr-00553-VRW Document 15 Filed 11/28/05 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER

CR 05-00553 VRW 2

unreasonably deny counsel for the defense the reasonable time necessary for effective

preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. See 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(A),

(B)(iv). Additionally, the filing of any pretrial motion through the conclusion of the hearing,

provides a separate basis under time is excluded from the calculation of time under the Speedy

Trial Act. See id. §3161(h)(1)(F). The ends of justice would be served by the Court excluding

the proposed time period. These ends outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant

in a speedy trial. See id. § 3161(h)(8)(A).

5. For the reasons stated, the time period from November 1, 2005 through January 31, 2006,

shall be excluded from the calculation of time under the Speedy Trial Act.

SO STIPULATED.

DATED: 11/02/05 Respectfully Submitted,

__/s/________________________________

SUSAN R. JERICH

Assistant United States Attorney

DATED: 11/22/05

__/s/_________________________________

IAN LOVESETH

Counsel for Defendant Lloyd Jamison

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: __________________________________

HON. VAUGHN R. WALKER

Chief Judge, United States District Court

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Judge Vaughn R Walker

November 28, 2005

Case 3:05-cr-00553-VRW Document 15 Filed 11/28/05 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER

CR 05-00553 VRW 3

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned hereby certifies that a copy of the Parties’ Stipulation and Proposed

Order in the case of United States v. Lloyd Jamison No. CR 05-00553 VRW, was served today

as follows:

Via Facsimile

Ian Loveseth

819 Eddy Street

San Francisco, CA 94109

(415) 474-3748

I certify under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.

Executed on November 2, 2005 at San Francisco, California.

 /s/

Rawaty Yim

United States Attorney’s Office

Case 3:05-cr-00553-VRW Document 15 Filed 11/28/05 Page 3 of 3