Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-15-08030/USCOURTS-ca4-15-08030-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
John Roosevelt Baccus
Appellant
D. Eastridge
Appellee
Others
Appellee
Brian P. Stirling
Appellee

Document Text:

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-8030

JOHN ROOSEVELT BACCUS,

 Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

BRIAN P. STIRLING; D. EASTRIDGE; OTHERS,

 Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Beaufort. David C. Norton, District Judge. 

(9:15-cv-02670-DCN)

Submitted: April 21, 2016 Decided: April 26, 2016

Before WILKINSON, KING, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John Roosevelt Baccus, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 15-8030 Doc: 28 Filed: 04/26/2016 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

John Roosevelt Baccus appeals the district court’s order 

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and 

dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint without 

prejudice. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible 

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the 

district court. Baccus v. Stirling, No. 9:15-cv-02670-DCN 

(D.S.C. filed Dec. 9, 2015; entered Dec. 10, 2015). We deny all 

of Baccus’s pending motions, including his motions for bail, to 

file an amicus curiae brief, to compel the production of 

videotapes, for a transcript at government expense, for 

disposition of informal briefing, and for judicial notice of his 

informal brief. We dispense with oral argument because the 

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Appeal: 15-8030 Doc: 28 Filed: 04/26/2016 Pg: 2 of 2