Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-03019/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-03019-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Aaron Brothers Art & Framing
Defendant
Aaron Brothers, Inc.
Defendant
Robert G. Blatman
Defendant
Alex Delly
Defendant
Sharon K. Delly
Defendant
Dmitry Yanushkevich
Plaintiff

Document Text:

{00112092. 1 } Page 1 of 3

Joint Stipulation and Proposed Order

Case No.: 16-CV-3019-EMC

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

LEON COSGROVE, LLC

John Bosco, Texas State Bar Number 24045533

8117 Preston Road, Suite 300

Dallas, TX 75225

Telephone: (214) 578-3529

Fax: (305) 437-8158

Email: jbosco@leoncosgrove.com

Admitted Pro Hac Vice

Attorney for AARON BROTHERS, INC., Defendant

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DMITRY YANUSHKEVICH,

Plaintiff,

vs.

AARON BROTHERS, INC., a Delaware 

corporation, d/b/a AARON BROTHERS 

ART & FRAMING; ALEX DELLY, an 

individual; SHARON K. DELLY, an 

individual; ROBERT G. BLATMAN, an 

individual; and DOES 1-20 inclusive,

 Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 16-cv-3019-EMC

JOINT STIPULATION AND 

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

EXTENDING TIME TO 

RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S 

COMPLAINT

WHEREAS, in the interest of conserving party and judicial resources and exploring the 

possibility of an early resolution, Plaintiff Dmitry Yanushkevich (“Plaintiff”), has provided 

Defendant Aaron Brothers, Inc., Defendant Alex Delly, Defendant Sharon K. Delly, and 

Defendant Robert G. Blatman (collectively, “Defendants”) with a settlement demand, 

Defendants have responded and the parties are actively engaged in productive settlement 

discussions; 

WHEREAS, a resolution of the case would obviate Defendants’ need to respond to the 

Complaint;

Case 3:16-cv-03019-EMC Document 18 Filed 11/07/16 Page 1 of 3
{00112092. 1 } Page 2 of 3

Joint Stipulation and Proposed Order

Case No.: 16-CV-3019-EMC

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WHEREAS, the parties have previously stipulated to extend Defendants’ deadline to 

respond to the Complaint;

Pursuant to Local Rule 6-2, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED to by and 

between the parties, subject to the approval of the Court, that the following deadlines apply:

November 11, 2016 Last Day for Defendants to Respond to Complaint

November 11, 2016 Last Day for Plaintiff to file “Notice of Need for 

Mediation”

No provision of this Stipulation shall be construed as a waiver of any and all claims or 

defenses available to either Plaintiff or Defendants, and any and all such claims and defenses are 

hereby expressly reserved.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Dated: October 26, 2016 /s/ Irene Karbelashvili 

Irene Karbelashvili, Attorney for 

Plaintiff Dmitry Yanushkevich

Dated: October 26, 2016 /s/ John Bosco 

John Bosco, Attorney for 

Defendant Aaron Brothers, Inc.

FILER’S ATTESTATION

Pursuant to Local Rule 5-1, I hereby attest that I, John D. Bosco, received the 

concurrence of counsel for Plaintiff in the filing of this document.

By: /s/ John Bosco

 JOHN BOSCO

Case 3:16-cv-03019-EMC Document 18 Filed 11/07/16 Page 2 of 3
{00112092. 1 } Page 3 of 3

Joint Stipulation and Proposed Order

Case No.: 16-CV-3019-EMC

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Based on the foregoing stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED that the following deadlines 

apply:

November 11, 2016 Last Day for Defendants to Respond to Complaint

November 11, 2016 Last Day for Plaintiff to file “Notice of Need for 

Mediation”

__________________________________________

THE HONORABLE JUDGE EDWARD M. CHEN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Edward M. Chen

Case 3:16-cv-03019-EMC Document 18 Filed 11/07/16 Page 3 of 3