Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_13-cv-01942/USCOURTS-caed-1_13-cv-01942-9/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
John Doe #1
Defendant
Richard M. Sansone
Plaintiff
J. C. Thomas
Defendant

Document Text:

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RICHARD M. SANSONE,

 Plaintiff,

 vs.

J. C. THOMAS, et al.,

 Defendants.

1:13-cv-01942-DAD-EPG-PC

ORDER VACATING 

DISCOVERY/SCHEDULING ORDER 

ISSUED ON JUNE 14, 2016 

(ECF No. 16.)

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO 

SERVE NEW ORDER REQUIRING 

INITIAL DISCLOSURES AND 

SETTING MANDATORY 

SCHEDULING CONFERENCE

Richard Sansone (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma 

pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This case now proceeds on the 

First Amended Complaint filed by Plaintiff on November 13, 2014, against defendants 

Correctional Officer J. C. Thomas and John Doe #1, for use of excessive force in violation of 

the Eighth Amendment.1 (ECF No. 27.)

On June 14, 2016, the Court issued a Discovery and Scheduling Order setting out 

deadlines in this case for filing exhaustion motions, amending pleadings, discovery, and filing 

dispositive motions. (ECF No. 42.) At this time, the Court finds it beneficial to replace the 

Discovery and Scheduling Order with a new order entitled “Order Requiring Initial Disclosures 

 

1 On May 5, 2016, the Court issued an order dismissing all other claims and defendants from this 

action, based on Plaintiff’s failure to state a claim. (ECF No. 36.)

Case 1:13-cv-01942-DAD-EPG Document 53 Filed 07/26/16 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

and Setting Mandatory Scheduling Conference.” To this end, the Court shall vacate the prior 

order in its entirety and direct the Clerk to serve the new order upon the parties to this case. All 

of the dates and deadlines in the prior Discovery and Scheduling Order shall be vacated.

Based on the foregoing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Discovery and Scheduling Order issued on June 14, 2016, is VACATED in 

its entirety;

2. The Clerk is DIRECTED to serve the “Order Requiring Initial Disclosures and 

Setting Mandatory Scheduling Conference” upon the parties to this case; and

3. The new order supercedes the prior order, and therefore all dates and deadlines 

set in the Discovery and Scheduling Order issued on June 14, 2016, are 

VACATED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 26, 2016 /s/

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:13-cv-01942-DAD-EPG Document 53 Filed 07/26/16 Page 2 of 2