Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_24-cv-02773/USCOURTS-caed-2_24-cv-02773-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Corie J. Caraway
Defendant
Orrin Tyler Colbourn
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ORRIN TYLER COLBOURN,

Plaintiff,

v.

CORIE J. CARAWAY,

Defendant.

No. 2:24-cv-2773-TLN-SCR

ORDER

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action seeking relief 

under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 

28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On October 28, 2024, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations which 

were served on plaintiff, and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and 

recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. Plaintiff has filed objections to the 

findings and recommendations.

The Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 

F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. 

See Robbins v. Carey, 481 F.3d 1143, 1147 (9th Cir. 2007) (“[D]eterminations of law by the 

magistrate judge are reviewed de novo by both the district court and [the appellate] 

court[.]”). Having carefully reviewed the entire file, including the objections, the Court finds the 

Case 2:24-cv-02773-TLN-SCR Document 7 Filed 12/06/24 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations (ECF No. 3) are adopted in full; 

2. Plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 4) and motion to appoint 

counsel (ECF No. 5) are denied as moot;

2. This action is dismissed for failure to state a claim; and 

3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case.

DATE: December 5, 2024

___________________________________

TROY L. NUNLEY

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:24-cv-02773-TLN-SCR Document 7 Filed 12/06/24 Page 2 of 2