Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-01955/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-01955-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Hatem Ali
Plaintiff
Alshifa Medical Group, Inc.
Defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

HATEM ALI,

Plaintiff,

v.

ALSHIFA MEDICAL GROUP, INC., et 

al.,

Defendants.

No. 2:15-cv-1955 MCE CKD PS (TEMP)

ORDER

Plaintiff Hatem Ali is proceeding in this action pro se. This matter was referred to the 

undersigned in accordance with Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). A settlement 

conference was scheduled in this matter for June 16, 2016. However, that settlement conference 

was vacated after plaintiff failed to file a timely confidential settlement conference statement. 

ECF No. 12. 

Plaintiff is advised that the failure of a party to comply with the Local Rules or any order 

of the court “may be grounds for imposition by the Court of any and all sanctions authorized by 

statute or Rule or within the inherent power of the Court.” Local Rule 110. Any individual 

representing himself or herself without an attorney is bound by the Federal Rules of Civil 

Procedure, the Local Rules, and all applicable law. Local Rule 183(a). Failure to comply with 

applicable rules and law may be grounds for dismissal or any other sanction appropriate under the 

Case 2:15-cv-01955-MCE-CKD Document 13 Filed 06/16/16 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Local Rules. Id. In light of plaintiff’s pro se status, and in the interests of justice, the court will 

provide plaintiff with an opportunity to show good cause for his conduct.

Accordingly, the court HEREBY ORDERS that within fourteen days of the date of this 

order, plaintiff shall show cause in writing as to why this action should not be dismissed for a lack 

of prosecution.1 Failure to timely file the required writing will result in a recommendation that

this action be dismissed for failure to prosecute.

Dated: June 16, 2016

BVD\ali1955.osc.dlop.ord.docx

 

1

 Alternatively, if plaintiff no longer wishes to pursue this civil action he may comply with this 

order by filing a notice of voluntary dismissal pursuant to Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil 

Procedure.

_____________________________________

CAROLYN K. DELANEY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:15-cv-01955-MCE-CKD Document 13 Filed 06/16/16 Page 2 of 2