Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca5-16-10404/USCOURTS-ca5-16-10404-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Jason Paul Roberts
Appellant
United States of America
Appellee

Document Text:

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-10404

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JASON PAUL ROBERTS,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:12-CR-267-1

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, JONES, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Jason Paul Roberts raises 

issues that are foreclosed by United States v. Schofield, 802 F.3d 722 (5th Cir. 

2015). In Schofield, 802 F.3d at 729-31, we held that a violation of 18 U.S.C. 

§ 1470 qualified as a sex offense for purposes of the Sex Offender Registration 

Notification Act (SORNA) and that SORNA’s residual clause is not ambiguous 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

October 18, 2016

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 16-10404 Document: 00513722100 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/18/2016
No. 16-10404

2

or unconstitutionally vague. Accordingly, Roberts’s motion for summary 

disposition is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

 Case: 16-10404 Document: 00513722100 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/18/2016