Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_09-cv-01642/USCOURTS-caed-2_09-cv-01642-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Grace Allen
Plaintiff
Commissioner of Social Security
Defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GRACE ALLEN, on behalf of

LANISHA LEE ANNA ALLEN,

a minor,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-09-1642 DAD

v.

MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, ORDER

Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant.

 /

Plaintiff’s counsel has attempted to set plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment

for hearing before the court merely by way of docket entry. He is not permitted to do so. A party

desiring oral argument in this social security case must file a request for argument. The request

must be filed at the time specified in the court’s June 16, 2009 scheduling order, must identify

the issues on which oral argument is desired, and must explain why oral argument would be

helpful. If the request is granted, the party’s motion will be set for hearing on a regularly

/////

/////

/////

/////

Case 2:09-cv-01642-DAD Document 19 Filed 02/03/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

scheduled law and motion calendar. Thus, plaintiff’s summary judgment motion (Doc. No. 18)

will not be placed on the June 16, 2010 calendar for hearing. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: February 2, 2010.

DAD:kw

Ddad1/orders.socsec/allen1642.ord.oralarg

Case 2:09-cv-01642-DAD Document 19 Filed 02/03/10 Page 2 of 2