Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_16-cv-00446/USCOURTS-caed-2_16-cv-00446-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Bharti Airtel Limited
Defendant
Mike Esposito
Plaintiff
Vodafone US, Inc.
Defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

EAST\123482050.1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MIKE ESPOSITO, INDIVIDUALLY 

AND ON BEHALF OF ALL OTHERS 

SIMILARLY SITUATED,

Plaintiff,

v.

BHARTI AIRTEL LIMITED; 

VODAFONE US, INC., AND DOES 1 

THROUGH 10, INCLUSIVE, AND 

EACH OF THEM,

Defendants.

CASE NO. 2:16-cv-00446-TLN-AC

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO 

EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO 

COMPLAINT

Complaint Filed: 03/03/16

Case 2:16-cv-00446-TLN-AC Document 10 Filed 04/18/16 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

EAST\123482050.1 -1-

Having considered the Parties’ Stipulation to Extend Time to Respond to Complaint 

(“Stipulation”), and finding good cause to GRANT the Stipulation, the Court hereby orders as 

follows:

The Stipulation is GRANTED. Bharti Airtel Limited shall have to and including May 12, 

2016 to move, answer or otherwise plead in response to the Complaint.

Dated: April 12, 2016

DLA PIPER LLP (US)

By /s/ Monica D. Scott

RAJIV DHARNIDHARKA

MONICA D. SCOTT

Attorneys for Defendant

BHARTI AIRTEL LIMITED

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 15, 2016

Case 2:16-cv-00446-TLN-AC Document 10 Filed 04/18/16 Page 2 of 2