Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-almd-2_04-cv-01002/USCOURTS-almd-2_04-cv-01002-3/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Wanda Denise Ayers
Plaintiff
Wal-Mart Corporation
Defendant

Document Text:

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, EASTERN DIVISION

WANDA DENISE AYERS, )

)

Plaintiff, )

) CIVIL ACTION NO.

v. ) 3:04cv1002-MHT

)

WAL-MART CORPORATION, )

)

Defendant. )

ORDER

After an independent and de novo review of the record,

it is ORDERED as follows: 

(1) The objections (Doc. Nos. 52 & 65) are overruled.

(2) The recommendation of the magistrate judge (Doc.

No. 48) is adopted.

(3) Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment (Doc. No.

35) is denied.

(4) Defendant’s motion for summary judgment (Doc. No.

40) is denied as to plaintiff’s claims that defendant

unlawfully discriminated against her on the basis of age

Case 2:04-cv-01002-MHT-WC Document 72 Filed 09/29/06 Page 1 of 2
and race when it did not select her for an interview or

promotion in connection with her February 2003

application, and the motion is granted in all other

respects.

An order setting this case for trial will follow

later.

DONE, this the 29th day of September, 2006.

 /s/ Myron H. Thompson 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:04-cv-01002-MHT-WC Document 72 Filed 09/29/06 Page 2 of 2