Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_16-cv-05114/USCOURTS-cand-4_16-cv-05114-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Beebell Inc.
Defendant
Ennova Research SRL
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ENNOVA RESEARCH SRL,

Plaintiff,

v.

BEEBELL INC.,

Defendant.

Case No. 16-cv-05114-KAW 

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

Re: Dkt. No. 13

On November 2, 2016, Plaintiff Ennova Research SRL filed a Motion for Default 

Judgment. (Dkt. No. 12.) On November 3, 2016, the Court issued an order requiring Plaintiff to 

file a proposed order that "shall be structured as outlined in Attachment A [of the November 3, 

2016 order] and include all relevant legal authority and analysis necessary to establish the case." 

(Dkt. No. 13 at 1.) As of November 29, 2016, Plaintiff has not filed the required proposed order. 

Accordingly, Plaintiff's counsel is ordered, by December 2, 2016, to 1) file the required 

proposed order, and 2) respond to this order to show cause by explaining why he failed to comply 

with the Court's November 3, 2016 order. Failure to complete both tasks by December 2, 2016 

may result in the Court denying Plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: November 29, 2016

__________________________________

KANDIS A. WESTMORE

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 4:16-cv-05114-KAW Document 16 Filed 11/29/16 Page 1 of 1