Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_03-cr-00174/USCOURTS-caed-2_03-cr-00174-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Susan Renee Chapple
Defendant
USA
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

United States District Court

Eastern District of California

United States of America,

Plaintiff,

vs.

Susan Renee Chapple,

Defendant.

No. Cr. S 03-174 DFL

Detention Order (Violation of

Pretrial Release, Probation or

Supervised Release)

-oOo-

 After a hearing pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3148

(violation of pretrial release order), the court

finds:

 There is probable cause to believe the person

has committed a federal, state or local crime

while on release and the defendant has not

rebutted the presumption that his release will

endanger another or the community or

 There is clear and convincing evidence that

the defendant has violated another condition

of release and

 based on the factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. §

3142 (g) there is no condition or combination

of conditions of release that will assure that

the defendant will not flee or pose a danger

Case 2:03-cr-00174-DFL Document 38 Filed 05/18/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

to the safety of another person or the

community or

 the person is unlikely to abide by any

condition or combination of conditions of

release. F.R.Cr.P. 32.1(a)(D),46(c), 18

U.S.C. § 3148.

 X Pursuant to F.R.Cr.P.32.1(a) and 46(c) and 18

U.S.C. § 3143 (violation of probation or supervised

release) the court finds defendant has not met his

burden of establishing by clear and convincing

evidence that he will not flee or pose a danger to

another person or to the community.

IT IS ORDERED that pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3142(I)(2)(4)

defendant is committed to the custody of the Attorney General for

confinement in a corrections facility separate, to the extent

practicable, from persons awaiting or serving sentences or being

held in custody pending appeal. The defendant shall be afforded

reasonable opportunity for private consultation with his counsel.

Upon further order of a court of the United States or request of an

attorney for the United States the person in charge of the

corrections facility in which defendant si confined shall deliver

defendant to a United States Marshal for the purpose of an

appearance in connection with a court proceeding.

Dated: May 18, 2005.

/s/ Peter A. Nowinski

 Peter A. Nowinski

 Magistrate Judge

Case 2:03-cr-00174-DFL Document 38 Filed 05/18/05 Page 2 of 2