Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-01793/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-01793-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Kenneth Dean Dawson
Plaintiff
US Government
Defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

United States District Court

Eastern District of California 

Kenneth Dean Dawson,

Plaintiff, No. Civ. S 04-1793 GEB PAN P

vs. Findings and Recommendations

US Government,

Defendant.

-oOoApril 8, 2005, the court dismissed plaintiff’s complaint for

failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted,

explained the deficiencies, and gave plaintiff leave to file an

amended complaint correcting those deficiencies. The time

allowed for amendment now has expired and plaintiff has not filed

an amended complaint.

Accordingly, I hereby recommend that this action be

dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be

granted. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A; 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).

Case 2:04-cv-01793-GEB-PAN Document 16 Filed 11/23/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l), these

findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States

District Judge assigned to this case. Written objections may be

filed within 20 days of service of these findings and

recommendations. The document should be captioned “Objections to

Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” The district

judge may accept, reject, or modify these findings and

recommendations in whole or in part.

Dated: November 22, 2005. 

 /s/ Peter A. Nowinski 

 PETER A. NOWINSKI

 Magistrate Judge

Case 2:04-cv-01793-GEB-PAN Document 16 Filed 11/23/05 Page 2 of 2