Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-01092/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-01092-3/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Ken Clark
Respondent
John Greschner
Petitioner

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOHN GRESCHNER, )

)

)

)

Petitioner, )

)

vs. )

)

)

KEN CLARK, )

)

)

Respondent. )

)

)

No. CV-F-06-1092 OWW

ORDER DENYING PETITIONER'S

MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION

(Doc. 9)

Petitioner moves for reconsideration of the February 8, 2007 

Order denying a Certificate of Appealability in connection with

Petitioner's appeal of the denial of his petition for writ of

habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. Petitioner contends

he is entitled to reconsideration because a Certificate of

Appealability is not required in order to appeal the denial of a

Section 2241 petition.

Petitioner's motion for reconsideration is DENIED. 

Petitioner's Section 2241 petition was denied because it is a

second or successive motion to vacate, set aside or correct

Case 1:06-cv-01092-OWW -LJO Document 14 Filed 03/28/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Therefore, a Certificate

of Appealability is required. Porter v. Adams, 244 F.3d 1006,

1007 (9 Cir.2001). th

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 28, 2007 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger 

emm0d6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-01092-OWW -LJO Document 14 Filed 03/28/07 Page 2 of 2