Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_08-cv-01874/USCOURTS-caed-1_08-cv-01874-7/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
BP West Coast Products, LLC
Counter Claimant
Rosedale Plaza Group, LLC
Counter Defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Martin R. Fox, Esq., SBN 155783

mfox@bleaufox.com

BLEAU FOX, A P. L.C.

3575 Cahuenga Boulevard West, Suite 580

Los Angeles, CA 90068

Telephone: (323) 874-8613

Facsimile: (323) 874-1234

Attorneys for Plaintiff, 

ROSEDALE PLAZA GROUP, LLC,

a California limited liability company

Jeffrey M. Hamerling, Esq., SBN 91532

jhamerling@archernorris.com

ARCHER NORRIS 

2033 North Main Street, Suite 800

Walnut Creek, California 94596

Telephone: (925) 930-6600

Facsimile: (925) 930-6620

Attorneys for Defendant,

BP WEST COAST PRODUCTS LLC,

a Delaware limited liability company

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ROSEDALE PLAZA GROUP, LLC, a

California limited liability company

 Plaintiff,

vs. 

BP WEST COAST PRODUCTS LLC,

a Delaware limited liability company,

DOES 1 through 100, Inclusive,

 Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NUMBER: 1-08-CV-01874-

OWW-GSA

Assigned to: Judge Oliver W. Wanger

STIPULATION AND ORDER RE:

CONTINUANCE OF OSC RE:

DISMISSAL OF ACTION

Trial Date: Settled/Off-Calendar

Place: Courtroom 3

Time: 9:00 a.m.

It is hereby stipulated by and between ROSEDALE PLAZA GROUP, LLC, a

California Limited Liability Company (hereinafter referred to as “ROSEDALE”), on

the one hand, and BP WEST COAST PRODUCTS, LLC, a Delaware Limited

Liability Company (hereinafter referred to as “BPWCP”), on the other hand, through

1

STIPULATION AND ORDER 

Case 1:08-cv-01874-OWW -GSA Document 92 Filed 01/21/10 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

their respective attorneys of record:

RECITALS and STIPULATIONS

A. Through the efforts of the Court and the parties, the above-entitled

matter has resolved;

B. On November 16, 2009, the Court entered an order that the parties shall

file a request for dismissal no later than December 7, 2009 or show cause why the

Court should not dismiss the matter (Document No. 87). Later, the Court granted both

parties’ request for a continuance of the OSC RE: Dismissal (Document No. 90) to

a new OSC Re: Dismissal date of January 21, 2010

C. Upon resolution of the matter, both parties have continuously worked to

effectuate the resolution.

D. However, the resolution entails several financial transactions and

obligations, all of which must be set forth in detailed writing. Additionally, the

transactions and obligations will take several months to conclude (at a minimum).

The parties have exchanged several drafts of an Agreement detailing the resolution

and have worked through almost all of the areas where they differed with only one

or two remaining. The parties continue to work on those remaining areas and expect

resolution on those matters shortly. 

E. In order to fully and completely ensure that this Court will not have to

interact with these parties on this matter again, the writings are complex and involve

multiple obligations and conditions precedent. 

F. Out of an abundance of caution, all Counsel agree, stipulate and

respectfully request that, with the Court’s permission, the Court continue the January

19, 2010 OSC Re: Dismissal to February 19, 2010 so that the parties can conclude

their resolution. All counsel fully expect that this will be the last request for an

extension of the OSC Re: Dismissal date.

///

///

2

STIPULATION AND ORDER 

Case 1:08-cv-01874-OWW -GSA Document 92 Filed 01/21/10 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Respectfully submitted,

DATED: January 19, 2010 BLEAU FOX, A P.L.C.

BY: /s/ Martin Fox

Martin R. Fox, Esq. 

Attorney for Plaintiff, 

ROSEDALE PLAZA GROUP, LLC,

a California limited liability company

DATED: January 19, 2010 ARCHER NORRIS

BY: /s/ Jeffrey M. Hamerling 

Jeffrey M. Hamerling, Esq.

Attorneys for Defendant,

BP WEST COAST PRODUCTS, LLC,

a Delaware limited liability company

ORDER

Based upon the stipulation of the parties, and for good cause shown, IT IS

HEREBY ORDERED that:

a. The partiesshall file a request for dismissal no later than February

19, 2010 or show cause why the Court should not dismiss the

matter.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 21, 2010 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger 

emm0d6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

3

STIPULATION AND ORDER 

Case 1:08-cv-01874-OWW -GSA Document 92 Filed 01/21/10 Page 3 of 3