Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_09-cv-00942/USCOURTS-caed-2_09-cv-00942-4/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Mule Creek State Prison Medical Office
Defendant
K. Regaldo
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

K. REGALDO,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-09-0942 FCD EFB P

vs.

MULE CREEK STATE PRISON

MEDICAL OFFICE, 

Defendant. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

Plaintiff is a prisoner, without counsel, suing for alleged civil rights violations. See 42

U.S.C. § 1983. On April 19, 2010, the court dismissed plaintiff’s complaint for failure to state a

cognizable claim against the defendant. The dismissal order explained the complaint’s

deficiencies, gave plaintiff 30 days to file an amended complaint correcting those deficiencies,

and warned plaintiff that failure to file an amended complaint would result in a recommendation

that this action be dismissed for failure to state a claim. 

The 30-day period has expired and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or

otherwise responded to the court’s order.

Accordingly, it is hereby RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed for failure to

state a claim. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A; 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).

Case 2:09-cv-00942-FCD-EFB Document 20 Filed 07/15/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days

after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written

objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned

“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Failure to file objections

within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Turner v.

Duncan, 158 F.3d 449, 455 (9th Cir. 1998); Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

Dated: July 14, 2010.

Case 2:09-cv-00942-FCD-EFB Document 20 Filed 07/15/10 Page 2 of 2