Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_17-cv-00081/USCOURTS-caed-1_17-cv-00081-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
D. Scott Carruthers, A Professional Law Corporation
Defendant
Floro M. Ybanez
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

The parties have filed as stipulation to dismiss this action with prejudice, with each party to 

bear their own attorney fees and costs. (Doc. 7) The stipulation relies on Fed. R. Civ.P. 41(a)(1)

which provides, “the plaintiff may dismiss an action without a court order by filing: . . . a stipulation 

of dismissal signed by all parties who have appeared.”. . .” Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a). Once such a notice 

has been filed, an order of the Court is not required to make the dismissal effective. Fed. R. Civ. P. 

41(a)(1)(ii); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997). Thus, the Clerk of Court 

is DIRECTED to close this action in light of the stipulation signed pursuant to Rule 41(a).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 28, 2017 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

FLORO M. YBANEZ,

Plaintiff,

vs.

D. SCOTT CARRUTHERS, A Professional Law 

Corporation,

Defendant.

Case No.: 1:17-cv-00081-DAD-JLT

[PROPOSED] ORDER CLOSING CASE

Case 1:17-cv-00081-DAD-JLT Document 8 Filed 02/28/17 Page 1 of 1