Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_02-cv-02685/USCOURTS-caed-2_02-cv-02685-6/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Kelly Services
Defendant
Lynn Noyes
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LYNN NOYES, )

) 2:02-cv-2685-GEB-CMK

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) ORDER ADDRESSING

) IN LIMINE MOTIONS

KELLY SERVICES, INC., )

) 

Defendant. )

)

Defendant’s motions in limine are addressed as follows:

1. Defendant’s motion in limine (Docket #95) to exclude the

testimony of Plaintiff’s expert Rick Ross concerns issues

that are involved in a Daubert hearing currently scheduled

for March 17, 2008. The Order filed March 5, 2008,

scheduling the Daubert hearing makes it unnecessary to

decide this motion, except to the extent that it seeks a

Daubert hearing which has been granted.

2. Defendant’s motion in limine on unspecified immigration

evidence (Docket #96) is denied.

Case 2:02-cv-02685-GEB-CMK Document 158 Filed 03/12/08 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

3. Defendant’s motion in limine on evidence of other alleged

acts of discrimination against Plaintiff (Docket #97) is

denied.

4. Defendant’s motion in limine on purported “retaliation

evidence” (Docket #98) is denied.

5. The record on Defendant’s “me too” motion in limine (Docket

#99) is not concrete enough for a ruling; therefore, the

motion is denied.

6. Defendant’s motion in limine to include all evidence of

DFEH/EEOC determination letters (Docket #100) is denied.

7. Defendant’s motion in limine to exclude testimony of Jeff

Boswell and Steve Wehrmann (Docket #101) is denied.

8. Defendant’s motion in limine to exclude evidence of punitive

damages (Docket #102) is denied.

9. Plaintiff’s motion in limine to exclude the letter that

advised Plaintiff her allegations could not be sustained

(Docket #103) is granted; the motion to exclude Mr. Ross’s

conviction for conspiracy to commit embezzlement is denied

(see advisory committee note to Rule 609 regarding

embezzlement constituting admissible evidence under Rule

609(a)(2); and, the motion concerning Ross’s other

sentencing records and psychological counseling records

(except a judgment of conviction for conspiracy to embezzle)

is granted; motion to exclude reference to civil lawsuit

involving $3,000,000 verdict is denied in light of

Defendant’s biased proffer. Further, Defendant has not

shown any other civil litigation matters have sufficient

probative value on an issue to be admitted. Lastly,

Case 2:02-cv-02685-GEB-CMK Document 158 Filed 03/12/08 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3

Plaintiff’s motion to exclude personal correspondence from

Rick Ross to Pricilla Coates in the 1980's is denied.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 11, 2008

 

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.

United States District Judge

 

Case 2:02-cv-02685-GEB-CMK Document 158 Filed 03/12/08 Page 3 of 3