Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_12-cr-00052/USCOURTS-caed-2_12-cr-00052-5/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
USA
Plaintiff
Leonid Yakovlev
Defendant

Document Text:

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff,

v.

LEONID YAKOVLEV

 Defendant,

CASE NO. 2:12-CR-0052 WBS

STIPULATION REGARDING 

EXCLUDABLE TIME PERIODS 

UNDER SPEEDY TRIAL ACT; 

[PROPOSED] FINDINGS AND 

ORDER

STIPULATION

Plaintiff United States of America, by and through its counsel of record, and defendant, by 

and through his counsel of record, hereby stipulate as follows: 

1. By previous order, this matter was set for status on August 13, 2012, at 9:30 p.m.

2. By this stipulation, defendant now moves to continue the status conference until 

September 10, 2012, and to exclude time between August 13, 2012 and September 10, 2012, under 

Local Code T4. Plaintiff does not oppose this request.

3. The parties agree and stipulate, and request that the Court find the following: 

a. The government represents that the discovery associated with this case includes over 

5,000 pages of documents and large spreadsheets detailing over 40,000 separate transactions, and 

thousands of fraud complaints to American Express. All of this discovery has been produced directly 

to counsel.

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

JEAN M. HOBLER

Assistant United States Attorney

501 I Street, Suite 10-100

Sacramento, CA 95814

Telephone: (916) 554-2700

Facsimile: (916) 554-2900 

Attorneys for Plaintiff

United States of America

Case 2:12-cr-00052-WBS Document 19 Filed 08/09/12 Page 1 of 3
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

b. Counsel for defendant desires additional time to consult with his client, to review the 

current charges, to conduct investigation and research related to the charges, to discuss potential 

resolutions with his/her client, and to otherwise prepare for trial.

c. Counsel for defendant believes that failure to grant the above-requested continuance 

would deny him/her the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the 

exercise of due diligence.

d. The government does not object to the continuance.

e. Based on the above-stated findings, the ends of justice served by continuing the case 

as requested outweigh the interest of the public and the defendant in a trial within the original date 

prescribed by the Speedy Trial Act. 

f. For the purpose of computing time under the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161, et 

seq., within which trial must commence, the time period of August 13, 2012, at 9:30 a.m. to 

September 10, 2012, inclusive, is deemed excludable pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 3161(h)(7)(A), B(iv) 

[Local Code T4] because it results from a continuance granted by the Court at defendant’s request on 

the basis of the Court's finding that the ends of justice served by taking such action outweigh the best 

interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

///

///

///

///

///

///

///

///

///

///

///

///

Case 2:12-cr-00052-WBS Document 19 Filed 08/09/12 Page 2 of 3
3

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

4. Nothing in this stipulation and order shall preclude a finding that other provisions of 

the Speedy Trial Act dictate that additional time periods are excludable from the period 

within which a trial must commence.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

DATED: August 8, 2012

/s/ Jean M. Hobler___________________ 

JEAN M. HOBLER

Assistant United States Attorney

DATED: August 8, 2012

/s/ Bruce Locke _____________ 

BRUCE LOCKE

Counsel for Defendant 

[as authorized on Aug. 7, 2012]

O R D E R

 

IT IS SO FOUND AND ORDERED this 9th day of August, 2012.

Case 2:12-cr-00052-WBS Document 19 Filed 08/09/12 Page 3 of 3