Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-00920/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-00920-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Commissioner of Social Security
Defendant
Cheryl Pierce
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CHERYL PIERCE,

Plaintiff,

v.

MICHAEL J. ASTRUE,

Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant.

_____________________________________ 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: 1:12-cv-00920-SKO

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S

REQUEST FOR AN EXTENSION OF

TIME TO FILE CONFIDENTIAL

LETTER BRIEF

(Docket No. 14)

On November 16, 2012, Plaintiff filed a stipulation requesting an extension of time to serve

her confidential letter brief on Defendant. (Doc. 16.) Plaintiff seeks an extension of time as a result

of having experienced technical difficulties in obtaining a copyoftheAdministrative Record through

ECF. (Doc. 16.) 

This request is granted, and the scheduling order is modified as follows:

1. Plaintiff’s confidential letter brief shall be served on or before December 31, 2012;

2. Commissioner’s confidential letter brief shall be served on or before February 7,

2013;

1

3. Any stipulation to remand the case shall be filed on or before February 25, 2013;

4. Plaintiff’s opening brief shall be filed on or before March 12, 2013;

The parties are reminded that the Scheduling Order has been amended and now requires that counsel file a

1

separate proof of service with the Court reflecting the date that a party's confidential letter brief was served on the

opposing party. The confidential letter briefs themselves are not to be filed with the Court.

Case 1:12-cv-00920-SKO Document 15 Filed 11/20/12 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

5. Commissioner’s responsive brief shall be filed on or before April 15, 2013; and

6. Plaintiff may file a reply brief on or before May 3, 2013.

2

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: November 20, 2012 /s/ Sheila K. Oberto 

ie14hj UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

These dates reflect application of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 6(a)(1)(C), 6(a)(6)(A), and 6(d); no

2

additional days are to be added pursuant to Rule 6.

2

Case 1:12-cv-00920-SKO Document 15 Filed 11/20/12 Page 2 of 2