Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_16-cv-02397/USCOURTS-caed-2_16-cv-02397-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Samsung Electronics America, Inc.
Defendant
Marletta Stine
Plaintiff

Document Text:

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION FOR 

RESPONDING TO COMPLAINT, 2:16-CV02397-MCE-EFB

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ANDREW J. FRACKMAN (pro hac forthcoming)

AMY LAURENDEAU (S.B. #198321)

CARLOS M. LAZATIN (pro hac forthcoming)

HANNAH Y. CHANOINE (pro hac forthcoming)

O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP

Times Square Tower

7 Times Square

New York, New York 10036-6524

Telephone: (212) 326-2000

Facsimile: (212) 326-2061

Attorneys for Defendant

Samsung Electronics America, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SACRAMENTO

MARLETTA STINE, on behalf of herself and 

those similarly situated,

Plaintiff,

v.

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, 

INC.,

Defendant.

Case No. 2:16-cv-02397-MCE-EFB

ORDER GRANTING 

STIPULATION CONTINUING 

SAMSUNG’S DEADLINE FOR 

RESPONDING TO COMPLAINT 

Having reviewed the Parties’ Stipulation Continuing Samsung’s Response Deadline, and, 

good cause appearing, the deadline for Defendant Samsung Electronics America, Inc. to respond

to Plaintiff Stine’s complaint is hereby continued until March 30, 2017.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 10, 2017

Case 2:16-cv-02397-MCE-EFB Document 8 Filed 01/11/17 Page 1 of 1