Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-04258/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-04258-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
William Alsup
Defendant
Michael Lawrence Beauchamp
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MICHAEL LAWRENCE BEAUCHAMP,

Plaintiff,

 v.

WILLIAM ALSUP,

Defendant /

No. C-06-4258 MMC

ORDER DISMISSING COMPLAINT;

DENYING APPLICATION TO PROCEED

IN FORMA PAUPERIS

Before the Court is plaintiff’s “Request for Orders to Stop Harassment,” filed July 11,

2006, which the Court construes as a complaint, and plaintiff’s application to proceed in

forma pauperis, also filed July 11, 2006.

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e), where a plaintiff seeks to proceed in forma

pauperis, the district court must dismiss the complaint if the court determines that the

complaint is frivolous or malicious, or that the plaintiff has failed to state a claim upon which

relief can be granted. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i), (ii).

Here, plaintiff’s complaint falls directly within the category of pleadings identified in

§ 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) and (ii). A brief history of plaintiff’s most recent filings in this District

illustrates the point.

On May 24, 2006, plaintiff filed a complaint against Amy Hughes Medina, alleging

she had been harassing plaintiff with a deadly weapon. See Beauchamp v. Hughes
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 1

The Court take judicial notice that Lillian K. Sing is a superior court judge.

2

Medina, C 06-3397 SI. On May 30, 2006, plaintiff filed another complaint, alleging therein

that Lillian K. Sing (“Judge Sing”)1

 filed a false report against plaintiff, and that Judge Sing,

Angeline Santos, and a neighbor of Angeline Santos had threatened plaintiff with a deadly

weapon. See Beauchamp v. Sing, C 06-3465 SI. On June 12, 2006, the Honorable Susan

Y. Illston dismissed each of the above-referenced cases, in each instance for the reason

that plaintiff failed to state a claim over which a federal court has jurisdiction. The orders of

dismissal were mailed to plaintiff on June 12, 2006.

On June 15, 2006, plaintiff filed yet another complaint. On that occasion, plaintiff

alleged that on June 14, 2006, presumably the date he received the above-referenced

orders of dismissal, Judge Illston had assaulted him with a deadly weapon and terrorized

him. See Beauchamp v. Illston, C 06-3768 WHA. On July 7, 2006, the Honorable William

H. Alsup dismissed said complaint on the ground it was “incomprehensible and patently

absurd,” (see Dismissal Order, filed July 6, 2006); the order of dismissal was mailed to

plaintiff.

In the instant matter, which appears to have been filed shortly after plaintiff received

the order dismissing his complaint against Judge Illston, plaintiff alleges Judge Alsup,

based on his rulings, has harassed and threatened plaintiff’s business, and libeled and

assaulted plaintiff’s person and property. Plaintiff further alleges Judge Alsup conspired

with Amy Hughes Medina, Judge Sing, Angeline Santos, the neighbor of Angeline Santos,

Judge Illston, and others, to, among other things, deprive plaintiff of his right to a trial on his

claim against Amy Hughes Medina.

The only material change between plaintiff’s most recent filing and his prior

complaints against Judge Sing and Judge Illston is that plaintiff has changed the name of

the defendant to identify the judge who most recently issued a ruling adverse to plaintiff. 

Plaintiff again has failed to state a claim that avoids the strictures of § 1915(e)(2)(B). See

Franceschi v. Schwartz, 57 F. 3d 828, 830 (9th Cir. 1995) (holding judges entitled to
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3

absolute immunity where plaintiff seeks to hold judge liable for performance of judicial

acts).

Accordingly, plaintiff’s complaint is hereby DISMISSED, pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

§ 1915(e)(2)(B), and plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis is hereby DENIED.

The Clerk shall close the file.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 18, 2006 

MAXINE M. CHESNEY

United States District Judge