Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-00911/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-00911-3/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Damien Coleman
Petitioner
Kathy Mendoza-Powers
Respondent

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

U.S. District Court

 E. D. California cd 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DAMIEN COLEMAN, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

)

)

v. )

)

)

)

KATHY MENDOZA-POWERS, )

)

Respondent. )

 )

1:07-CV-00911 LJO SMS HC

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATION

[Doc. #11]

ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT

OF HABEAS CORPUS

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT

TO ENTER JUDGMENT

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. 

On June 6, 2008, the Magistrate Judge issued a Findings and Recommendation that

recommended the petition be DENIED with prejudice. The Magistrate Judge further recommended

that the Clerk of Court be DIRECTED to enter judgment. The Findings and Recommendation was

served on all parties and contained notice that any objections were to be filed within thirty (30) days

of the date of service of the order. Over thirty (30) days have passed and no party has filed

objections. 

Case 1:07-cv-00911-LJO -SMS Document 12 Filed 07/23/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

U.S. District Court

 E. D. California cd 2

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a de

novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court concludes that the

Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation is supported by the record and proper analysis,

and there is no need to modify the Findings and Recommendations.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendation issued June 6, 2008, is ADOPTED IN FULL; 

2. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED with prejudice; 

3. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to enter judgment; and

4. As this petition challenges a parole decision, a certificate of appealability is not required.

Rosas v. Nielsen, 428 F.3d 1229, 1232 (9th Cir.2005).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 22, 2008 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill 

b9ed48 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:07-cv-00911-LJO -SMS Document 12 Filed 07/23/08 Page 2 of 2