Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-00700/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-00700-3/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
International Union of Bricklayers and Allied Craftworkers
Defendant
Dave Sheppard
Defendant
Tom Spear
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF TO EXTEND PAGE LIMITS, 

Spear v. IUBAC, N.D. Cal. Case No. 3:07-cv-00700-MMC

JEFFREY B. DEMAIN (#126715)

PEDER J. V. THOREEN (#217081)

Altshuler Berzon LLP

177 Post Street, Suite 300

San Francisco, CA 94108

Telephone: (415) 421-7151

Facsimile: (415) 362-8064 

jdemain@altshulerberzon.com

pthoreen@altshulerberzon.com

Attorneys for Defendants

International Union of Bricklayers and 

Allied Craftworkers and Dave Sheppard 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TOM SPEAR,

Plaintiff,

v.

INTERNATIONAL UNION OF BRICKLAYERS

AND ALLIED CRAFTWORKERS; and 

DAVE SHEPPARD in the Capacity of Receiver

Over Bricklayers and Allied Craftworkers Local 3

California, 

Defendants. ________________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 3:07-cv-00700-MMC

STIPULATION AND ORDER

REGARDING ADMINISTRATIVE

RELIEF TO EXTEND PAGE

LIMITS

Case 3:07-cv-00700-MMC Document 49 Filed 04/23/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF TO EXTEND PAGE LIMITS, 

Spear v. IUBAC, N.D. Cal. Case No. 3:07-cv-00700-MMC 1

Pursuant to Local Rules 7-11 and 7-12, the parties submit this stipulation and proposed

order regarding the briefing of plaintiff’s pending motion for a preliminary injunction. Due to the

number of issues raised by plaintiff’s motion, the parties hereby stipulate that both sides should be

provided reasonable extensions of the page limits that would otherwise apply to their opposition

and reply briefs. Specifically, the parties respectfully request that the Court grant defendants a tenpage extension, such that defendants may file an opposition brief of up to 35 pages of text. The

parties further request the Court grant plaintiff a five-page extension, such that plaintiff may file a

reply brief of up to 20 pages of text.

Respectfully submitted,

Dated: April 18, 2007 JEFFREY B. DEMAIN

PEDER J. V. THOREEN

Altshuler Berzon LLP

By:___/s/_____________________________

Peder J. V. Thoreen

Attorneys for Defendants

Dated: April 18, 2007 W. KENT KHTIKIAN

CHRISTOPHER W. KATZENBACH

Katzenbach and Khtikian, Attorneys at Law

By:____/s/____________________________

Christopher W. Katzenbach

Attorneys for Plaintiff

ORDER

For good cause, the parties’ request to extend page limits is GRANTED. Defendants may

file a brief in opposition to plaintiff’s motion for a preliminary injunction of up to 35 pages. 

Plaintiff may file a reply brief of up to 20 pages.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 23, 2007 ______________________________

HON. MAXINE M. CHESNEY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 3:07-cv-00700-MMC Document 49 Filed 04/23/07 Page 2 of 2