Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cr-00193/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cr-00193-25/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Rudy Tafoya
Defendant
USA
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

William E. Bonham, SBN: 55478

Attorney At Law

Hotel de France Bldg. Old Sacramento

916 2nd Street, 2nd Floor, Suite A

Sacramento, CA 95814

Telephone: (916) 557-1113

Facsimile: (916) 557-1118

E-mail: billbonham@mylaw.comcastbiz.net

Attorney for defendant 

RUDY TAFOYA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

RUDY TAFOYA,

Defendant.

No. 2:14-CR-00193-GEB

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

TO CONTINUE STATUS CONFERENCE

Date: January 6, 2017 

Time: 9:00 am 

Judge: Hon. Garland E. Burrell, 

Jr.

Defendant, Rudy Tafoya, through his undersigned counsel, and 

the United States, through its undersigned counsel, hereby agree 

and request that the status conference currently set for Friday, 

January 6, 2017 at 9:00 am be vacated and reset for Friday, 

January 27, 2017 at 9:00 am. 

A continuance is necessary to allow defense counsel 

additional time to investigate and evaluate the case as to 

warrantless search issues and the basis for obtaining the search 

warrant. In addition, the defense is still investigating the 

allegation that some of the items seized during execution of the 

search warrant were in fact silencers. 

Case 2:14-cr-00193-JAM Document 75 Filed 01/05/17 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

The parties further stipulate that the failure to grant a 

continuance in this matter would deny counsel reasonable time 

necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the 

exercise of due diligence; that the ends of justice served by 

granting this continuance outweigh the best interest of the 

public and the defendant in a speedy trial; and that time should 

be excluded from the computation of time within which trial must 

commence under the Speedy Trial Act from January 6, 2017, up to 

and including January 27, 2017, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161 

(h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv) and Local Code T-4, to allow defense 

counsel reasonable time to prepare.

I, William E. Bonham, the filing party, have received 

authorization from AUSA Justin Lee to sign and submit this 

stipulation and proposed order on his behalf.

Accordingly, the defense and the United States agree and 

stipulate that the status conference for defendant Rudy Tafoya 

should be reset for Friday, January 27, 2017 at 9:00 am. 

Dated: January 4, 2017 PHILLIP A. TALBERT 

Acting United States Attorney

/s/ JUSTIN LEE

JUSTIN LEE

Assistant U.S. Attorney

Dated: January 4, 2017 /s/ WILLIAM BONHAM

WILLIAM BONHAM

Counsel for defendant 

RUDY TAFOYA

Case 2:14-cr-00193-JAM Document 75 Filed 01/05/17 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3

ORDER

The status conference currently set for Friday, January 6, 

2017 at 9:00 am is vacated and reset for Friday, January 27,

2017, at 9:00 am. 

I find that the failure to grant such a continuance would 

deny counsel reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, 

taking into account the exercise of due diligence. Accordingly, 

the time within which the trial of this case must be commenced 

under the Speedy Trial Act is excluded from January 6, 2017, up 

to and including the date of the new status conference, January 

27, 2017, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv) and 

Local Code T4. I specifically find that the ends of justice 

served by granting this continuance outweigh the best interest of 

the public and defendants in a speedy trial within the meaning of 

18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv) and Local Code T-4. IT IS 

SO ORDERED. 

Dated: January 5, 2017

Case 2:14-cr-00193-JAM Document 75 Filed 01/05/17 Page 3 of 3