Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_14-cv-04879/USCOURTS-cand-4_14-cv-04879-8/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
HPM Investments, Inc.
Cross-claimant
Crystal Ivy
Plaintiff
Farooq Qassim Mayet
Cross-claimant
Richmond Auto Sales
Defendant
Cheng Saephan
Plaintiff
Rajeshwar Singh
Cross-claimant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 ________________________________________________________________________________________________

[PROPOSED] ORDER RE: JOINT STIPULATION DISMISSING ACTION WITH PREJUDICE AND REQUEST 

FOR RETENTION OF JURISDICTION 1

GEOFFREY E. WIGGS (SBN 276041)

LAW OFFICES OF GEOFF WIGGS

1900 S. Norfolk St, Suite # 350

San Mateo, Ca 94403

geoff@wiggslaw.com

Telephone: (650) 577-5952

Facsimile: (650) 577-5953

Scott R. Kaufman (SBN 190129)

Kaufman Law Offices, Inc.

140 Third Street

Los Altos, Ca 94022

Telephone: 650-383-6663

Facsimile: 650-383-6667

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

CRYSTAL IVY & CHENG SAEPHAN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - OAKLAND/SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

CRYSTAL IVY, an individual, and 

CHENG SAEPHAN, an individual,

 Plaintiffs,

v. 

FAROOQ QASSIM MAYET , 

individually and dba RICHMOND 

AUTO SALES, RAJESHWAR SINGH 

individually and dba RICHMOND 

AUTO SALES, HPM INVESTMENTS, 

INC., a California Corporation, and

DOES 2-50, INCLUSIVE,

 Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 3:14-cv-04879-HSG (EDL)

ORDER RE: JOINT STIPULATION 

DISMISSING ACTION WITH PREJUDICE 

AND REQUEST FOR RETENTION OF 

JURISDICTION

Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii)

Case 4:14-cv-04879-HSG Document 85 Filed 12/07/16 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 ________________________________________________________________________________________________

[PROPOSED] ORDER RE: JOINT STIPULATION DISMISSING ACTION WITH PREJUDICE AND REQUEST 

FOR RETENTION OF JURISDICTION 2

Having considered the Parties’ Joint Stipulation to Dismiss the Action With 

Prejudice and Request for Retention of Jurisdiction, and good cause appearing 

therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED with prejudice 

and this Court shall retain jurisdiction over this action for the limited purpose of 

enforcing the terms of the Settlement Agreement reached between the Parties.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: 

Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr.

United States District Judge 

12/7/2016

Case 4:14-cv-04879-HSG Document 85 Filed 12/07/16 Page 2 of 2