Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_08-cv-03003/USCOURTS-caed-2_08-cv-03003-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Abertnathy
Defendant
Tom Bosenko
Defendant
Galindo
Defendant
Hendershot
Defendant
Prison Health Services LLP
Defendant
City Of Redding
Defendant
Shasta County Jail
Defendant
Don Van Buskirk
Defendant
Westmoreland
Defendant
Dale Yeadon
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1 

YEADON v CITY OF REDDING, ET AL. No. 2:08-CV-03003 LKK KJM

Stipulation and [Proposed] Order for Dismissal of Complaint with Prejudice Pursuant to FRCP 41 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

KUMIN SOMMERS LLP 

MATTHEW KUMIN, CSB # 177561 

SAMANTHA R. NILSEN, CSB # 264919 

870 Market Street Suite 428 

San Francisco, CA 94102 

Tel: (415) 434-4500 

Fax: (415) 434-8453 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

DALE YEADON 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

DALE YEADON 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

SHASTA COUNTY JAIL, SHERIFF TOM 

BOSENKO, PRISON HEALTH SERVICES 

LLP, OFFICER WESTMORELAND, 

OFFICER HENDERSHOT, OFFICER 

GALINDO, OFFICER ABERTNATHY, and 

CAPTAIN DON VAN BUSKIRK, and Does I 

through XX 

 

 Defendants. 

No. 2:08-CV-03003 LKK KJM 

STIPULATION AND ORDER 

FOR DISMISSAL OF COMPLAINT WITH 

PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO FRCP 41 

Date: September 16, 2010 

Time: 10:00 a.m. 

Courtroom: 26 

WHEREAS, in May and June 2010, Plaintiff Dale Yeadon and all Defendants agreed to 

fully settle the instant action; 

WHEREAS, the Parties subsequently entered into a settlement and executed settlement 

agreements resolving all of Plaintiff’s claims against Defendants. 

NOW THEREFORE, the Parties hereby jointly and respectfully request that the Court, 

pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1), discontinue and dismiss with prejudice the 

above-titled action as to all parties, with each party bearing his or its own costs fees and costs, 

except as provided for in the Settlement Agreements. 

// 

Case 2:08-cv-03003-LKK -KJM Document 31 Filed 07/14/10 Page 1 of 3
2 

YEADON v CITY OF REDDING, ET AL. No. 2:08-CV-03003 LKK KJM

Stipulation and [Proposed] Order for Dismissal of Complaint with Prejudice Pursuant to FRCP 41 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Dated: July 7, 2010 KUMIN SOMMERS LLP 

 ___//s//______________________________

Samantha R. Nilsen 

 Attorney for Plaintiff, DALE YEADON 

Dated: July 7, 2010 BRICKWOOD LAW OFFICE 

 ___//s// (filed with permission)_____________

Gary Brickwood 

Attorney for Defendants, SHASTA COUNTY, 

SHERIFF TOM BOSENKO, OFFICER 

WESTMORELAND, OFFICER HENDERSHOT, 

OFFICER GALINDO, OFFICER ABERNATHY, 

OFFICER DON VAN BUSKIRK 

Dated: July 7, 2010 LAW OFFICES OF NANCY E. HUDGINS 

 ___//s// (filed with permission)_____________

Matthew M. Grigg 

Attorney for Defendant PRISON HEALTH 

SERVICES, INC. 

Case 2:08-cv-03003-LKK -KJM Document 31 Filed 07/14/10 Page 2 of 3
3 

YEADON v CITY OF REDDING, ET AL. No. 2:08-CV-03003 LKK KJM

Stipulation and [Proposed] Order for Dismissal of Complaint with Prejudice Pursuant to FRCP 41 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 ORDER 

Having been advised by the parties that settlements were entered into, pursuant to which 

Mr. Yeadon has agreed to release all claims in exchange for valuable consideration, the matter of 

Yeadon v. Shasta County Jail et al., United States District Court, Eastern District of California, 

Case No. 2:08-CV-03003 LKK KJM, is, by reason of the settlement, hereby dismissed with 

prejudice in its entirety as to all parties. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 14, 2010 

Case 2:08-cv-03003-LKK -KJM Document 31 Filed 07/14/10 Page 3 of 3