Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-01221/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-01221-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Steven Mayberg
Defendant
Ben McLain
Defendant
Frank Enepi Sisneroz
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

FRANK ENEPI SISNEROZ,

Plaintiff,

v.

STEVEN MAYBERG, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

1:07-cv-01221-LJO-SMS-PC

ORDER FINDING SERVICE OF COMPLAINT

APPROPRIATE, AND FORWARDING

SERVICE DOCUMENTS TO PLAINTIFF FOR

COMPLETION AND RETURN

(Doc. 1)

Plaintiff Frank Enepi Sisneroz (“Plaintiff”) is a civil detainee proceeding pro se and in

forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The court screened

Plaintiff’s complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) and finds that it states cognizable

claims for relief under section 1983 against defendants Mayberg and McLain for violation of the

Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. Fed.R.Civ.P.8(a); Swierkiewicz v. Sorema

N.A., 534 U.S. 506, 512-515 (2002); Hydrick v. Hunter, 466 F.3d 676, 697 (9th Cir. 2006). 

Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Service is appropriate for the following defendants:

STEVEN MAYBERG

BEN McLAIN

2. The Clerk of the Court shall send Plaintiff TWO USM-285 forms, TWO

summonses, a Notice of Submission of Documents form, an instruction sheet and

a copy of the Complaint filed AUGUST 21, 2007.

Case 1:07-cv-01221-LJO -SMS Document 7 Filed 08/29/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

3. Within THIRTY (30) DAYS from the date of this Order, Plaintiff shall complete

the attached Notice of Submission of Documents and submit the Notice to the

Court with the following documents:

a. One completed summons for each defendant listed above;

b. One completed USM-285 form for each defendant listed above; and 

c. THREE copies of the endorsed complaint filed August 21, 2007.

4. Plaintiff need not attempt service on Defendants and need not request waiver of

service. Upon receipt of the above-described documents, the court will direct the

United States Marshal to serve the above-named Defendants pursuant to Federal

Rule of Civil Procedure 4 without payment of costs. 

5. The failure to comply with this Order will result in a Recommendation that this

action be dismissed.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 28, 2007 /s/ Sandra M. Snyder 

icido3 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:07-cv-01221-LJO -SMS Document 7 Filed 08/29/07 Page 2 of 2