Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cr-00576/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cr-00576-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Denzel Anderson
Defendant
USA
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

USA,

Plaintiff,

v.

ANDERSON,

Defendant.

Case No. 14-cr-00576-SI-1 

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: 

JOHNSON CLAIM RAISED IN 

SECTION 2255 MOTION

Re: Dkt. No. 44

Before the Court is the motion of Denzel Anderson (“movant”) for an order under 28 

U.S.C. § 2255 to vacate, set aside or correct his sentence on the ground that his sentence has been 

rendered invalid by the Supreme Court’s holding in Johnson v. United States, 135 S. Ct. 2551 

(2015). This Johnson claim appears colorable under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 and merits an answer from 

the government.

The following deadlines will apply, unless the parties submit a stipulation and order for a 

shorter briefing schedule: (1) within 75 days after movant filed the § 2255 motion, the government 

shall file an opposition conforming in all respects to Rule 5 of the Rules Governing Section 2255 

Proceedings, showing cause why the court should not “vacate, set aside or correct” movant’s 

sentence; (2) movant shall file a reply brief 45 days after the opposition is filed. Thereafter, the 

matter will be deemed submitted on the papers, unless the court orders otherwise.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated:

______________________________________

SUSAN ILLSTON

United States District Judge

10/3/16

Case 3:14-cr-00576-SI Document 46 Filed 10/04/16 Page 1 of 1