Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_08-cv-00894/USCOURTS-cand-4_08-cv-00894-2/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Jane Rocio Evans
Plaintiff
Walden House, Inc.
Defendant

Document Text:

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JANE ROCIO EVANS,

Plaintiff(s), No. C 08-0894 PJH

v. ORDER RE AMENDED COMPLAINT

WALDEN HOUSE, INC.,

Defendant(s).

_______________________________/

By order dated filed May 9, 2008, the court dismissed plaintiff’s complaint for failure

to establish federal subject matter jurisdiction. The dismissal was with leave to amend. 

Plaintiff was given instructions on the deficiencies in her complaint and was permitted to file

an amended complaint curing those deficiencies by May 30, 2008. Instead of filing an

amended complaint, plaintiff filed on May 29, 2008, a request to vacate judgment to

dismiss complaint and on June 2, 2008, a request to vacate order to dismiss complaint. 

Both requests contain a narrative of certain factual matters and numerous unidentified

documents are attached to each. Plaintiff appears to argue in both documents why her

complaint should not have been dismissed, but she still does not clearly state what her

claims are so that the court might complete the review required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915.

Accordingly, plaintiff’s requests are both DENIED. However, plaintiff will be afforded

one more opportunity to file an amended complaint. The document must contain the

heading “Amended Complaint” or “First Amended Complaint,” and must clearly set forth the

acts committed by defendant that she is suing for, the dates these acts are alleged to have

been committed, and the legal basis for this court’s federal subject matter jurisdiction, as

explained int his court’s prior order. The amended complaint must be filed by July 10,

Case 4:08-cv-00894-PJH Document 15 Filed 06/17/08 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

2008, or this matter will be dismissed.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 17, 2008 ______________________________

PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON

United States District Judge

Case 4:08-cv-00894-PJH Document 15 Filed 06/17/08 Page 2 of 2