Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_15-cv-01137/USCOURTS-caed-1_15-cv-01137-6/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Courtesy Oldsmobile-Cadillac, Inc.
Defendant
Sherwin-Williams Automotive Finishes
Plaintiff
Sherwin-Williams Company
Plaintiff
Ben Wells
Defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR DEFENDANTS TO FILE A THIRD AMENDED ANSWER 

Matthew W. Quall, #183759

mquall@quallcardot.com

Quall Cardot LLP

205 East River Park Circle, Suite 110

Fresno, CA 93720

Telephone: (559) 418-0333

Facsimile: (559) 418-0330

Attorneys for Defendants COURTESY OLDSMOBILE-CADILLAC, INC., a California 

corporation, and BEN WELLS, an individual 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

THE SHERWIN-WILLIAMS COMPANY, 

d/b/a SHERWIN-WILLIAMS AUTOMOTIVE 

FINISHES, 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

COURTESY OLDSMOBILE-CADILLAC, 

INC., a California corporation; and BEN WELLS, 

an individual.

Defendant.

Case No. 1:15-cv-01137-MJS

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO FILE 

THIRD AMENDED ANSWER 

TO THE HONORABLE MICHAEL J. SENG, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE:

Defendants COURTESY OLDSMOBILE-CADILLAC, INC. and BEN WELLS 

(collectively, “Defendants”), and Plaintiff, THE SHERWIN-WILLIAMS COMPANY, d/b/a 

SHERWIN-WILLIAMS AUTOMOTIVE FINISHES (“Plaintiff”), by and through their 

respective counsel, hereby agree and stipulate as follows: 

RECITALS

WHEREAS, Plaintiff filed a Complaint for Damages and Demand for Jury Trial (the 

“Complaint”) on July 22, 2015, in United Stated District Court, Eastern District of California, 

Case No. 1:15-cv-01137. 

///

Case 1:15-cv-01137-MJS Document 52 Filed 08/29/16 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR DEFENDANTS TO FILE A THIRD AMENDED ANSWER 

WHEREAS, Defendants filed an Answer with the Complaint on October 5, 2015.

WHEREAS, Defendants filed a Second Amended Answer with the Court on March 4, 

2016.

WHEREAS, Defendants intend to voluntarily amend their Answer.

STIPULATION

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between Plaintiff and Defendants 

as follows: 

1. Defendants shall file a Third Amended Answer on or before September 2, 2016.

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

Dated: August 26, 2016 By: ___/s/ Matthew W. Quall 

Matthew W. Quall

Attorneys for Defendants 

COURTESY OLDSMOBILE-CADILLAC, 

INC., a California corporation, 

and BEN WELLS, an individual

Dated: August 26, 2016 By: ___/s/ Natasha M. Lockhart 

George Fish

Jeffrey Wilson

Natasha M. Lockhart

Attorneys for Plaintiff THE SHERWINWILLIAMS COMPANY, d/b/a 

SHERWIN-WILLIAMS AUTOMOTIVE 

FINISHES

ORDER

GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants may

file a Third Amended Answer provided they do so before September 2, 2016.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 29, 2016 /s/Michael J. Seng 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:15-cv-01137-MJS Document 52 Filed 08/29/16 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR DEFENDANTS TO FILE A THIRD AMENDED ANSWER 

Case 1:15-cv-01137-MJS Document 52 Filed 08/29/16 Page 3 of 3