Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_05-cv-02124/USCOURTS-azd-2_05-cv-02124-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Kamel Hamid Ali Alfadheli
Petitioner
Phillip Crawford
Respondent

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Kamel Hamid Ali Alfadheli, 

Petitioner, 

vs.

Phillip Crawford, 

Respondent. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV 05-2124-PHX-JAT (LOA)

ORDER

Pending before the Court is Petitioner’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus

(“Petition”) (Doc. #1). The Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation (“R&R”)

(Doc. #11) recommending that the Petition be denied. 

Neither party has filed objections to the R&R. Accordingly, the Court hereby accepts

the R&R. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985) (finding that district courts are not

required to conduct “any review at all . . . of any issue that is not the subject of an objection”

(emphasis added)); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en

banc) (“statute makes it clear that the district judge must review the magistrate judge’s

findings and recommendations de novo if objection is made, but not otherwise” (emphasis

in original)); see also Schmidt v. Johnstone, 263 F.Supp.2d 1219, 1226 (D. Ariz. 2003).

/ / /

/ / /

/ / /

Case 2:05-cv-02124-JAT Document 13 Filed 04/06/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

Therefore,

IT IS ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (Doc.

#11) is ACCEPTED;

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus

(Doc. #1) is DENIED as moot; and

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED, without prejudice.

DATED this 6th day of April, 2006.

Case 2:05-cv-02124-JAT Document 13 Filed 04/06/06 Page 2 of 2