Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_12-cv-04976/USCOURTS-cand-3_12-cv-04976-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
John Doe
Defendant
Ingenuity 13 LLC
Plaintiff

Document Text:

UNITED 

STATES 

DISTRICT 

COURT

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED 

STATES 

DISTRICT 

COURT

U

For the Northern District of California

NITED 

STATES 

DISTRICT 

COURT

For the Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Northern District of California

INGENUITY 13 LLC,

Plaintiff,

v.

JOHN DOE,

Defendant).

_____________________________________/

No. C 12-04976 JSW (MEJ)

ORDER DENYING EX PARTE

APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO

TAKE EXPEDITED DISCOVERY

Re: Docket No. 12

On December 14, 2012, Defendant John Doe filed an Ex Parte Application for Leave to Take

Limited Discovery. Dkt. No. 12. Upon review of Defendant’s Application, the Court finds that the

need for expedited discovery does not outweigh the prejudice to the responding party. Accordingly,

good cause does not exist and Defendant’s Application is DENIED. Semitool, Inc. v. Tokyo Electron.

Am., Inc., 208 F.R.D. 273 (N.D. Cal. 2002). Defendant’s request for a stay of the subpoena return

date is also DENIED. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 7, 2013 _______________________________

Maria-Elena James 

United States Magistrate Judge 

Case 3:12-cv-04976-JSW Document 18 Filed 01/07/13 Page 1 of 1