Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-01118/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-01118-3/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Otis Rube Terry
Petitioner
James Yates
Respondent

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

OTIS RUBE TERRY, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

v. )

)

JAMES YATES, Warden, )

)

Respondent. )

 )

1:06-cv-01118-AWI-DLB-HC

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS (Doc. 7)

ORDER DISMISSING PETITION

FOR HABEAS CORPUS

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO

ENTER JUDGMENT

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a

Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. 

On November 27, 2006, the Magistrate Judge filed Findings and

Recommendations that the instant petition for writ of habeas corpus

be DISMISSED, without prejudice, as a successive petition. These

Findings and Recommendations were served on all parties and

contained notice that any objections were to be filed within thirty

(30) days from the date of service of that order. On December 12,

2006, Petitioner filed objections to the Findings and

Recommendations.

//

/

Case 1:06-cv-01118-LJO-DLB Document 11 Filed 02/15/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636

(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a de novo review of the case. 

Having carefully reviewed the entire file, including Petitioner's

objections, the Court concludes that the Magistrate Judge's

Findings and Recommendations are supported by the record and proper

analysis. Petitioner's objections present no grounds for

questioning the Magistrate Judge's analysis. Petitioner must file

a petition, requesting permission to file a second petition, in the

Ninth Circuit.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed November 27,

2006, are ADOPTED IN FULL; 

2. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DISMISSED,

without prejudice, as a successive petition; and, 

3. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to enter judgment.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 15, 2007 /s/ Anthony W. Ishii 

0m8i78 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-01118-LJO-DLB Document 11 Filed 02/15/07 Page 2 of 2