Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-02636/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-02636-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Debbie Asuncion
Respondent
Robert M. Hunt
Petitioner

Document Text:

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

ROBERT M. HUNT, 

Petitioner, 

v. 

DEBBIE ASUNCION, 

Respondent. 

No. 2:15-cv-2636 TLN GGH P 

ORDER 

 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas 

corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On February 9, 2016, respondent filed a motion to dismiss. 

Petitioner has not filed an opposition to the motion. Local Rule 230(l) provides in part: “Failure 

of the responding party to file written opposition or to file a statement of no opposition may be 

deemed a waiver of any opposition to the granting of the motion . . . .” 

Petitioner has also failed to submit an in forma pauperis certification signed by an 

authorized officer of the prison or pay the required filing fee, as ordered by the court on January 

29, 2016. See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914(a); 1915(a). Petitioner shall either submit the appropriate 

affidavit in support of a request to proceed in forma pauperis or submit the appropriate filing fee. 

 Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: Petitioner shall show cause, 

within thirty days, why his failure to oppose respondent’s August 3, 2012 motion to dismiss 

should not be deemed a waiver of any opposition to the granting of the motion, and he shall file 

Case 2:15-cv-02636-TLN-GGH Document 10 Filed 03/10/16 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2

an opposition. Petitioner shall also show cause for his failure to submit the appropriate affidavit 

in support of a request to proceed in forma pauperis or submit the appropriate filing fee, and he 

shall submit the proper documentation or fee. Petitioner is cautioned that failure to respond to the 

instant order, or to file an opposition to the pending motion to dismiss, will result in a 

recommendation that this action be dismissed. 

Dated: March 9, 2016 

 /s/ Gregory G. Hollows 

 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

 

GGH:076/Hunt2636.osc 

Case 2:15-cv-02636-TLN-GGH Document 10 Filed 03/10/16 Page 2 of 2