Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01932/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01932-10/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Cemex, Inc.
Defendant
Jose Cervantes
Plaintiff
Jorge Montes
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Page 1

ORDER ON PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR A STAY PENDING APPEAL PURSUANT TO

Fed. R. Civ. P. 62(d)

Case No. 1:12-cv-01932-LJO-JLT

María G. Díaz, SBN 220087

Kirby Fernando Cañon, SBN 276414

THE DIAZ LAW FIRM

7045 N. Maple Ave., Suite 107

Fresno, California 93720

Telephone: (559) 321-8880

Facsimile: (559) 321-8878

Kirbv@mdliazlaw.com

Maria@mdiazlaw.com

Nathan Goldberg SBN:61292

ALLRED MAROKO GOLDBERG

6300 Wilshire Blvd, Suite 1500

Los Angeles, CA 90048

Telephone No. (323) 653-6530

Fax No. (323) 653-1660

NGoldberg@amglaw.com

Attorneys for PLAINTIFFS, JOSE CERVANTES and JORGE MONTES

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOSE CERVANTES, an Individual; and

JORGE MONTES, an Individual,

Plaintiffs,

vs.

CEMEX, INC., a Corporation; and DOES 1

to 50, inclusive,

Defendants.

CASE NO. 1:12-cv-01932-LJO-JLT

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ 

MOTION FOR A STAY PENDING 

APPEAL PURSUANT TO Fed. R. Civ. 

P. 62(d)

Date: March 30, 2015

Time: 8:30 a.m.

Courtroom: 4, 7th Floor

Judge: Hon. Judge Lawrence J. O’Neill

Case 1:12-cv-01932-LJO-JLT Document 119 Filed 03/18/15 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 Page 2

[PROPOSED] ORDER ON PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR APPROVAL OF SECURITY AND A 

STAY PENDING APPEAL PURSUANT TO Fed. R. Civ. P. 62(d)

Case No. 1:12-cv-01932-LJO-JLT

After consideration of Plaintiffs Motion For Approval of a Stay Pending Appeal 

Pursuant To Fed. R. Civ. P. 62(d), all other papers filed herein, the records of the case, 

and the oral argument on the Motion, if any, and good cause appearing, the Court 

HEREBY ORDERS as follows:

1) Plaintiffs’ Bank of The West Cashier’s Check, Check No. 1001788597, in the 

amount of $1,677.42 is APPROVED. 

2) Plaintiffs are directed to deliver the $1,677.42 Cashier’s Check to the Clerk or Chief 

Deputy Clerk of the United States District Court, Eastern District, Fresno within 7 

court days of the signing of this Order.

3) These funds satisfy this Court’s Order on Defendant’s Bill of Costs, which tax the 

Plaintiffs $1,341.93 in costs – including any applicable interest.

4) The Clerk may use the Cashier’s Check deposited to acknowledge the $1,341.93 in 

costs taxed by this Court, Dkt. #111, and any applicable interest, as soon as the 

pending appeal with the United States Court of Appeal for the Ninth Circuit, Case 

No. 14-17437, is terminated by Court order or the Parties reach a resolution

regarding the disposition of the Cashier’s Check.

ORDER

Good cause having been shown and in light of Defendant’s statement of non-opposition, 

Plaintiffs’ motion to stay enforcement of the bill of costs is GRANTED. The hearing on the 

motion, currently set for March 30, 2015, is VACATED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 18, 2015 /s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:12-cv-01932-LJO-JLT Document 119 Filed 03/18/15 Page 2 of 2