Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-02925/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-02925-2/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Svetlana Blackburn
Plaintiff
Oracle America, Inc.
Defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 

OHSUSA:766045191.1 

Daniel Velton (SBN 267890)

VJ Chetty (SBN 271778) 

VELTON ZEGELMAN P.C. 

525 W. Remington Drive, Suite 106 

Sunnyvale, CA 94087 

Telephone: (408) 505-7892 

Fax: (408) 228-1930 

dvelton@vzfirm.com 

vchetty@vzfirm.com 

Attorneys for Plaintiff

Michael Delikat (NY State Bar No. MD1165)

Appearing pro hac vice

mdelikat@orrick.com 

Renee B. Phillips (NY State Bar No. RP4456) 

Appearing pro hac vice

rphillips@orrick.com 

ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP 

51 West 52nd Street 

New York, New York 10019-6142 

Telephone: (212) 506-5000 

Fax: (212) 506-5151 

Kenneth Herzinger (SBN 209688) 

kherzinger@orrick.com 

Erin M. Connell (SBN 223355) 

econnell@orrick.com 

ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP 

405 Howard Street 

San Francisco, CA 94105 

Telephone: (415) 773-5700 

Fax: (415) 773-5759 

Attorneys for Defendant

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SVETLANA BLACKBURN, 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

ORACLE AMERICA, INC., 

 Defendant. 

Case No. 3:16-cv-02925-EMC

[PROPOSED] STIPULATED RULE 

502(d) ORDER 

Hon. Edward M. Chen 

Action Filed: June 1, 2016 

Case 3:16-cv-02925-EMC Document 40 Filed 11/29/16 Page 1 of 3
[PROPOSED] STIPULATED 502(D) ORDER

CASE NO. 3:16-CV-02925-EMC 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 

OHSUSA:766045191.1 

I. PURPOSE 

This Stipulated Order will govern discovery of electronically stored information (“ESI”) 

in this case as a supplement to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, this Court’s Guidelines for 

the Discovery of Electronically Stored Information, and any other applicable orders and rules. 

 II. DOCUMENTS PROTECTED FROM DISCOVERY 

(1) The production of privileged or work-product protected documents, 

electronically stored information (“ESI”) or information, whether inadvertent or otherwise, is 

not a waiver of the privilege or protection from discovery in this case or in any other federal or 

state proceeding. This Order shall be interpreted to provide the maximum protection allowed 

by Federal Rule of Evidence 502(d). 

(2) Nothing contained herein is intended to or shall serve to limit a party’s right to 

conduct a review of documents, ESI or information (including metadata) for relevance, 

responsiveness and/or segregation of privilege and/or protected information before productions. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD. 

Dated: November 28, 2016 VELTON ZEGELMAN P.C. 

By: /s/ Daniel Velton 

DANIEL VELTON 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

Dated: November 28, 2016 ORRICK HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE, LLP

By: /s/ Michael Delikat 

MICHAEL DELIKAT 

Attorneys for Defendant 

.

Filer’s Attestation: Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I attest under penalty of 

perjury that concurrence in the filing of the document has been obtained from its signatory. 

Case 3:16-cv-02925-EMC Document 40 Filed 11/29/16 Page 2 of 3
[PROPOSED] STIPULATED 502(D) ORDER

CASE NO. 3:16-CV-02925-EMC 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 

OHSUSA:766045191.1 

Dated: November 28, 2016 Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Michael Delikat 

MICHAEL DELIKAT 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated:

Hon. Edward M. Chen

United States District Judge

11/29/2016

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Edward M. Chen

Case 3:16-cv-02925-EMC Document 40 Filed 11/29/16 Page 3 of 3