Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca5-14-40960/USCOURTS-ca5-14-40960-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Mario Perez-Razo
Appellant
United States of America
Appellee

Document Text:

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-40960

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

MARIO PEREZ-RAZO,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 5:14-CR-221-1

Before SMITH, WIENER, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Mario Perez-Razo

has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with 

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 

229 (5th Cir. 2011). Perez-Razo has not filed a response. We have reviewed 

counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We 

concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

March 18, 2015

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 

Case: 14-40960 Document: 00512973494 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/18/2015
No. 14-40960

issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw 

is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the 

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

The written judgment contains a clerical error. Perez-Razo pleaded 

guilty to the offense of attempted illegal reentry by a previously deported alien; 

the written judgment incorrectly identifies the nature of the offense as 

“[r]e-entry of a deported alien.” Accordingly, we REMAND for correction of the 

error in accordance with Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 36. See United 

States v. Angeles-Mascote, 206 F.3d 529, 531 (5th Cir. 2000); United States v. 

Figueroa-Noriega, 530 F. App’x 382, 383 (5th Cir. 2013); United States v. 

Rosales, 448 F. App’x 466, 466-67 (5th Cir. 2011).

2

Case: 14-40960 Document: 00512973494 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/18/2015