Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-00901/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-00901-2/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
B&B Construction
Plaintiff
Robert Tarter
Counter Defendant
United States of America
Counter Claimant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LABOR FORCE PARTNERS, LTD., 

et al.,

NO. CIV. S-06-0311 FCD/KJM

Plaintiffs,

v. ORDER OF NON-RELATED CASES

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Defendant.

______________________________/

ROBERT TARTER, d/b/a B&B

CONSTRUCTION,

NO. CIV. S-06-0901 GEB/KJM 

Plaintiff,

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Defendant.

______________________________/

The undersigned judge declines to relate the above-captioned

cases pursuant to Local Rule 83-123(a). Assignment of the

matters to the same judge is not likely to effect a substantial

savings of judicial effort or other economies. Both actions

involve the same or similar defendants, but the actions involve

events specific to each party, the questions of fact are

Case 2:06-cv-00901-GEB -KJN Document 19 Filed 03/08/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

different, the questions of law are not novel, it is not clear

that the same result should follow in both actions, and

assignment to different judges would not entail substantial

duplication of labor.

Therefore, CIV. S-06-0901 GEB/KJM, shall not be reassigned

to the undersigned judge.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: March 7, 2007

Case 2:06-cv-00901-GEB -KJN Document 19 Filed 03/08/07 Page 2 of 2