Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_24-cv-02477/USCOURTS-caed-2_24-cv-02477-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Jenny Ann Burks
Plaintiff
Commissioner of Social Security
Defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Stipulated Motion for Extension of Time 1

PHILLIP A. TALBERT 

United States Attorney

MATHEW W. PILE

Associate General Counsel

Office of Program Litigation, Office 7

Oscar Gonzalez de Llano

Special Assistant United States Attorney

Social Security Administration 

Office of General Counsel 

6401 Security Boulevard 

Baltimore, MD 21235

Telephone: (510) 970-4818

Email: Oscar.Gonzalez@ssa.gov

Attorneys for Defendant

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JENNY ANN BURKS, o/b/o BAMAB

(Minor),

Plaintiff,

v.

Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant.

No. 2:24-cv-02477-DMC

STIPULATED MOTION AND ORDER FOR 

AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO 

PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY 

JUDGMENT

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties through their respective 

counsel of record, with the Court’s approval, that Defendant’s time for responding to Plaintiff’s 

Motion for Summary Judgment be extended thirty-three (33) days from January 8, 2025, to 

February 10, 2025. This is Defendant’s first request for an extension. Counsel for Plaintiff has 

no objection to Defendant’s request for an extension. 

Good cause exists for this request. Defendant respectfully requests this additional time 

because Counsel for Defendant has and will be unable to devote the time required to complete its 

Case 2:24-cv-02477-DMC Document 10 Filed 01/10/25 Page 1 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2 

response. Counsel has multiple merit briefs currently due in district court cases within the next 

week. Counsel for Defendant was also out of the office for much of the previous couple weeks 

including December 23rd – 26th and December 30th – January 1st due to planned holiday as well 

as illness. Given upcoming competing workload requirements an extension until February 10, 

2025, will provide the opportunity for the undersigned Counsel for Defendant to prioritize 

completing the response to Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment. The undersigned Counsel 

apologizes to the Court and Plaintiff’s counsel for any inconvenience caused by this request and 

delay. All other dates in the Court’s Scheduling Order shall be extended accordingly. 

 Respectfully submitted,

 PHILLIP A. TALBERT 

 United States Attorney

DATE: January 7, 2025 By: s/ Oscar Gonzalez de Llano 

 OSCAR GONZALEZ DE LLANO

 Special Assistant United States Attorney

 Attorneys for Defendant 

Respectfully submitted,

DATE: January 7, 2025 By: s/ Sherianne Laba * 

SHERIANNE LABA, ESQ. Osterhout Berger Daly (*as authorized by email) 

Attorney for Plaintiff

Case 2:24-cv-02477-DMC Document 10 Filed 01/10/25 Page 2 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

3 

ORDER

Pursuant to Defendant’s Motion, IT IS SO ORDERED that Defendant shall have an 

extension, up to and including February 10, 2025, to respond to Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary 

Judgment. 

Dated: January 8, 2025 

____________________________________ 

DENNIS M. COTA

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:24-cv-02477-DMC Document 10 Filed 01/10/25 Page 3 of 3