Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca5-16-40066/USCOURTS-ca5-16-40066-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Francisco De La Cruz-Trevino
Appellant
United States of America
Appellee

Document Text:

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-40066

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

FRANCISCO DE LA CRUZ-TREVINO,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 7:15-CR-292-1

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, JONES, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Francisco De La CruzTrevino raises an argument that is foreclosed by United States v. Daugherty, 

264 F.3d 513, 518 (5th Cir. 2001). In Daugherty, we rejected a Commerce 

Clause challenge to 18 U.S.C. § 922(g) and held that “the constitutionality of 

§ 922(g) is not open to question.” Daugherty, 264 F.3d at 518 (internal 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

October 18, 2016

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 16-40066 Document: 00513722144 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/18/2016
No. 16-40066

2

quotation marks and citation omitted). Accordingly, the motion for summary

disposition is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

 Case: 16-40066 Document: 00513722144 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/18/2016