Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-00174/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-00174-4/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Baldomero Guardiola
Petitioner
Dennis Smith
Respondent

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BALDOMERO GUARDIOLA, )

)

)

Petitioner, )

)

v. )

)

)

DENNIS SMITH, Warden, )

)

)

Respondent. )

)

 )

1:07-cv-00174-AWI-TAG HC

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATION (Doc. 10)

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS

PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

(Doc. 5)

ORDER DISMISSING PETITION FOR WRIT

OF HABEAS CORPUS (Doc. 1)

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT

TO ENTER JUDGMENT

On January 31, 2007, Petitioner filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 2241 in this Court.

On May 16, 2007, Respondent filed a motion to dismiss the petition as premature. (Doc.

5). On July 26, 2007, the Magistrate Judge assigned to the case filed a Findings and

Recommendation recommending the motion to dismiss be granted and that the petition for writ

of habeas corpus be dismissed because the relief requested was premature and the case was not

ripe. (Doc. 10). This Findings and Recommendation was served on all parties and contained

notice that any objections were to be filed within twenty days from the date of service of that

order. To date, the parties have not filed timely objections to the Findings and Recommendation.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted

a de novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court concludes that

Case 1:07-cv-00174-AWI-TAG Document 12 Filed 09/20/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

the Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendation is supported by the record and proper

analysis. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendation, filed July 26, 2007 (Doc. 11), is ADOPTED

IN FULL;

2. Respondent’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 5), is GRANTED;

3. This petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. 1), is DISMISSED; and

4. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to ENTER JUDGMENT and close the file. 

This order terminates the action in its entirety. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 20, 2007 /s/ Anthony W. Ishii 

0m8i78 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:07-cv-00174-AWI-TAG Document 12 Filed 09/20/07 Page 2 of 2