Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cr-00553/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cr-00553-8/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Lloyd Jamison
Defendant
USA
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

CONTINUING EVIDENTIARY HEARING & DOCUMENTING EXCLUSION OF TIME 1

IAN LOVESETH, SBN 085780

Attorney at Law

819 Eddy Street

San Francisco, California 94109

Tel: (415) 771-6174

Fax: (415) 474-3748

Attorney for Defendant

LLOYD JAMISON 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

--o0o--

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

NO. CR-05-00553-VRW

Plaintiff,

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING EVIDENTIARY

HEARING AND DOCUMENTING

EXCLUSION OF TIME

vs.

LLOYD JAMISON,

Defendant.

 /

IAN G. LOVESETH, attorney for defendant, LLOYD JAMISON, and SUSAN JERICH,

Assistant United States Attorney, hereby stipulate that the evidentiary hearing for defendant’s

Motion to Suppress currently set for Monday, April 10, 2006 at 9:30 a.m. shall be continued until

Tuesday, May 23, 2006 at 2:00 p.m. The continuance is necessary to give the defendant

additional time to subpoena impeachment materials and to conduct follow-up investigation in the

event this impeachment material yields possible witnesses. 

The Court hereby finds, as follows: 

1. The parties have stipulated to continuing the evidentiary hearing in this case.

Case 3:05-cr-00553-VRW Document 35 Filed 04/10/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

CONTINUING EVIDENTIARY HEARING & DOCUMENTING EXCLUSION OF TIME 2

2. Taking into account the public interest in the prompt disposition of criminal cases, continuing

the evidentiary hearing is necessary for effective preparation as it will allow defense counsel

additional time to subpoena impeachment material and to conduct follow-up investigation in the

event this impeachment material yields possible witnesses. 

3. The ends of justice served by excluding the period from April 10, 2006 to May 23, 2006

outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant, Mr. Jamison, in a speedy trial. See, 18

U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(A). 

Accordingly, and with the consent of the parties, the Court hereby: (1) vacates the

evidentiary hearing currently set for April 10, 2006 at 9:30 a.m; (2) sets a new hearing date for

the evidentiary hearing on May 23, 2006 at 2:00 p.m in Courtroom 6, 17th Floor, San Francisco,

CA before the Hon. Chief Judge Vaughn R. Walker; and, (3) orders that the period of time from

April 10, 2006 to May 23 2006 be excluded from the Speedy Trial Act calculations under 18

U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(A) and (B)(ii) and (iv).

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

DATED: April 5, 2006 /s/ Ian G. Loveseth 

IAN G. LOVESETH

Attorney for Defendant

LLOYD JAMISON

DATED: April 5, 2006 /s/ Susan Jerich 

SUSAN JERICH

Assistant United States Attorney

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: April ____, 2006

_______________________________

Hon. VAUGHN R. WALKER

Chief Judge, United States District Court

10

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Vaughn R Walker

Case 3:05-cr-00553-VRW Document 35 Filed 04/10/06 Page 2 of 2