Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-15-01267/USCOURTS-ca4-15-01267-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Theodore Michael
Appellee
Belinda Slade
Appellant

Document Text:

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-1264

BELINDA SLADE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

DONALD E. SLADE; YVETTE SLADE,

Defendants - Appellees.

No. 15-1265

BELINDA SLADE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

SEALO MICHAEL; LAVONNE MICHAEL,

Defendants - Appellees.

No. 15-1266

BELINDA SLADE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

CATHY HARRIS; SPENCE HARRIS,

Appeal: 15-1267 Doc: 11 Filed: 05/26/2015 Pg: 1 of 4
2

Defendants - Appellees.

No. 15-1267

BELINDA SLADE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

THEODORE MICHAEL,

Defendant - Appellee.

No. 15-1268

BELINDA SLADE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

TRUDY MICHAEL,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Middle 

District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Loretta Copeland 

Biggs, District Judge. (1:14-cv-00968-LCB-LPA; 1:14-cv-00969-

LCB-LPA; 1:14-cv-00970-LCB-LPA; 1:14-cv-00971-LCB-LPA; 1:14-cv00973-LCB-LPA)

Submitted: May 21, 2015 Decided: May 26, 2015

Before MOTZ, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Appeal: 15-1267 Doc: 11 Filed: 05/26/2015 Pg: 2 of 4
3

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Belinda Slade, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 15-1267 Doc: 11 Filed: 05/26/2015 Pg: 3 of 4
4

PER CURIAM:

Belinda Slade seeks to appeal the district court’s orders

denying relief on her civil complaints. The district court 

referred these cases to a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 

§ 636(b)(1)(B) (2012). The magistrate judge recommended in each 

case that relief be denied under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) 

(2012), and advised Slade that failure to file timely, specific

objections to each recommendation could waive appellate review 

of a district court order based upon that recommendation.

The timely filing of specific objections to a magistrate 

judge’s recommendation is necessary to preserve appellate review 

of the substance of that recommendation when the parties have 

been warned of the consequences of noncompliance. Wright v. 

Collins, 766 F.2d 841, 845-46 (4th Cir. 1985); see also Thomas 

v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985). Slade has waived appellate review 

in each case by failing to file objections after receiving 

proper notice. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma 

pauperis and dismiss the appeals.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Appeal: 15-1267 Doc: 11 Filed: 05/26/2015 Pg: 4 of 4