Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca10-15-03171/USCOURTS-ca10-15-03171-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Matthew Rucker
Appellant
The Federal Reserve
Appellee
The International Monetary Fund
Appellee
The State of Kansas Corporation
Appellee
The United States Federal Corporation
Appellee
The World Bank
Appellee
Vatican Bank
Appellee

Document Text:

FILED

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

December 15, 2015

Elisabeth A. Shumaker

Clerk of Court

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT

MATTHEW RUCKER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

THE VATICAN BANK; THE

WORLD BANK; THE

INTERNATIONAL MONETARY

FUND; THE FEDERAL RESERVE;

THE UNITED STATES FEDERAL

CORPORATION; THE STATE OF

KANSAS CORPORATION,

Defendants - Appellees.

No. 15-3171

(D.C. No. 5:15-CV-03143-SAC-DJW)

(D. Kan.)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

Before GORSUCH, O’BRIEN, and BACHARACH, Circuit Judges.

Matthew Rucker, a prisoner housed at the Larned Correctional Mental

Health Facility, seeks leave from this court to proceed in forma pauperis and to

appeal the district court’s dismissal of his complaint as legally frivolous. We do

*

 After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined

unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist in the determination

of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is

therefore ordered submitted without oral argument. This order is not binding

precedent except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata and collateral

estoppel. It may be cited, however, for its persuasive value consistent with Fed.

R. App. P. 32.1 and 10th Cir. R. 32.1.

Appellate Case: 15-3171 Document: 01019539715 Date Filed: 12/15/2015 Page: 1 
not see how we can. Even if we were to grant his motion and reach the merits of

his appeal, Mr. Rucker has failed to identify any reasoned basis for reversing the

district court’s order. The district court’s order is affirmed and the appeal is

dismissed. We further note that the district court’s dismissal is Mr. Rucker’s

third strike under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), restricting any future actions brought

under that section. Mr. Rucker’s in forma pauperis motion is denied. He is

reminded that he is obliged to pay the filing fee in full.

ENTERED FOR THE COURT

PER CURIAM

- 2 -

Appellate Case: 15-3171 Document: 01019539715 Date Filed: 12/15/2015 Page: 2