Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_11-cv-01866/USCOURTS-caed-1_11-cv-01866-14/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Leif Bergman
Counter Defendant
Bergman Landscape, Inc.
Counter Defendant
Pacific Coast Commodities
Defendant
Steel Ventures, Inc.
Defendant
Michael P. Tobin
Counter Claimant
Holly W. Tobin
Counter Claimant
United States of America
Defendant
Bob Vanella
Defendant
Vanella Farms
Defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LEIF BERGMAN, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

MICHAEL P. TOBIN., et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 1:11-CV-01866-LJO-GSA

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ 

UNOPPOSED MOTION TO APPROVE 

NOTICE OF SALE, PUBLISH NOTICE OF 

SALE, ESTABLISH SALE PROCEDURES, 

AND DIRECT ISSUANCE OF WRIT OF 

SALE

(Doc. 81)

This case concerns real property commonly known as 1717 East Hawkeye Avenue, Turlock, 

California (the “Property”), owned by Defendants Michael P. Tobin and Holly W. Tobin (“the 

Tobins” or “judgment debtors”).

1

See Doc. 1. Plaintiff Bergman Landscape, Inc. holds a mortgage 

secured by the Property. Id.

On November 26, 2013, this Court issued a Judgment of Foreclosure and Order of Sale with 

regard to the Property, following a Notice of Settlement reached by the parties. Doc. 80. The 

settlement permitted entry of judgment, “with delayed enforcement permitting [the Tobins] an 

opportunity to make payments totaling an agreed sum by fixed deadlines.” Doc. 70, at 1. “In the event 

[the Tobins] are unable to meet the required payment benchmarks, the settlement will permit 

enforcement of judgment by sale of [the Property.]” Id. Through the date of entry of the Judgment, 

 

1 According to the original complaint, the remaining Defendants, Steel Ventures, Inc. d/b/a Pacific Coast Commodities, 

the United States of America, Bob Vanella individually, and d/b/a Vanella Farms, claim some right, title or interest in the 

Property, and “are necessary parties to this action to ensure that they are bound by any findings and judgment of the 

Court.” Doc. 1-1 at ¶ 5. 

Case 1:11-cv-01866-LJO-GSA Document 88 Filed 03/29/16 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

the Tobins were indebted to Plaintiffs for principal, interest, late charges, attorneys’ fees and costs, 

in the total sum of $288,304.11. Doc. 80, at 3. The Judgment ordered that the Property be sold 

according to the procedures set forth in 28 U.S.C. § 2001, et seq., in a public sale by the Sheriff of 

Stanislaus County or the United States Marshall. Id. The Judgment stayed enforcement by sale until 

June 2, 2015, in accordance with the parties’ settlement. Id. The Judgment also retained the Court’s 

jurisdiction to enforce the parties’ settlement agreement. Id., at 5. 

On December 19, 2015, Plaintiffs filed the pending motion for the Court to approve their 

proposed notice of sale, publish said notice of sale, establish sales procedures, and direct issuance 

of a writ of sale as to the Property, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 2001, 2002, and Federal Rule of Civil 

Procedure 64(a). Doc. 81. The Tobins do not oppose the motion. Doc. 87.

In connection with their motion, Plaintiffs submitted evidence that the Tobins have not 

complied with the terms of the settlement, as they have failed to make the agreed-upon payments 

by the deadlines. Doc. 81-2 at ¶ 4. Moreover, the June 2, 2015 stay has lapsed. See id. The Court 

has reviewed Plaintiffs’ proposed procedures for the sale, and finds them to be in accordance with 

28 U.S.C. § 2002. Accordingly, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2001, which authorizes district courts to 

order any sales of real property “upon such terms and conditions as the court directs,” the Court 

GRANTS Plaintiffs’ motion to approve notice of sale, publish said notice of sale, establish sales 

procedures, and direct issuance of a writ of sale. Moreover, as Plaintiffs have waived deficiency, 

there is no need for appraisal of the Property, as normally required by 28 U.S.C. § 2001(b). Doc. 

80, at 4.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED as follows: 

1. The Sheriff of Stanislaus County or the United States Marshall is AUTHORIZED and 

DIRECTED under 28 U.S.C. §§ 2001, 2002 to offer for public sale and to sell the Property. 

The terms and conditions of the November 26, 2013 Judgment (Doc. 80) are incorporated 

by reference here, with the following supplemental procedures to be followed: 

a. That the sale occur at the North Entrance of the Superior Court of the State of 

California in and for the County of Stanislaus, located at 1100 I Street, Modesto, 

California, at the hour of 1:30, on the date specified in the notice of sale, or as 

Case 1:11-cv-01866-LJO-GSA Document 88 Filed 03/29/16 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3

permitted in the notice of sale, after the notice of sale has been published for the 

period required by 28 U.S.C. § 2002;

b. That the sale be made at auction to the highest bidder for cash paid by certified or 

cashier’s check; 

c. That persons desiring to bid must be qualified to do so by displaying to the levying 

officer certified or cashier’s checks establishing the upper limit of their ability to bid;

d. That the successful bidder shall be required to deposit with the levying officer certified 

or cashier’s checks totaling at least the amount of the successful bid;

e. That the judgment creditor may bid giving the levying officer a written receipt 

crediting all or part of the amount required to satisfy the judgment to judgment 

creditors; 

f. That no bids shall be accepted from persons other than qualified bidders;

g. That if the highest bidder does not pay the amount bid, a new sale shall be held 

immediately; 

h. That in furtherance of all the foregoing, the Sherriff or United States Marshall shall 

serve a notice of levy in substantially the form attached to Doc. 81-2 as Exhibit 3, on 

the judgment debtors.

2. The Proposed Notice of Sale (Doc. 81-2, Ex. 4) is APPROVED for publication in the 

Turlock Journal, a newspaper of general circulation in the city and county where the 

Property is located; 

3. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to issue of a writ of sale to be served on the 

judgment debtors.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 29, 2016 /s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

4.

Case 1:11-cv-01866-LJO-GSA Document 88 Filed 03/29/16 Page 3 of 3