Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_09-cv-01925/USCOURTS-cand-3_09-cv-01925-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Ben Curry
Respondent
Gregory Wayne Williams
Petitioner

Document Text:

KKC/MOATT

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

GREGORY WAYNE WILLIAMS,

 Petitioner,

 v.

BEN CURRY, Warden

 Respondent.

No. 09-73278

ORDER

Before: SILVERMAN, PAEZ and BEA, Circuit Judges. 

The application for authorization to file a second or successive 28 U.S.C.

§ 2254 habeas corpus petition in the district court is denied. Petitioner has not

made a prima facie showing under 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(2) that:

(A) the claim relies on a new rule of constitutional law, made retroactive to

cases on collateral review by the Supreme Court, that was previously

unavailable; or

(B)(i) the factual predicate for the claim could not have been discovered

previously through the exercise of due diligence; and (ii) the facts

underlying the claim, if proven and viewed in light of the evidence as a

whole, would be sufficient to establish by clear and convincing evidence

that, but for constitutional error, no reasonable factfinder would have found

the petitioner guilty of the underlying offense.

FILED

JAN 21 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

Case: 09-73278 01/21/2010 Page: 1 of 2 DktEntry: 7202046 Case 3:09-cv-01925-SI Document 7 Filed 01/29/10 Page 1 of 2
KKC/MOATT

No petition for rehearing or motion for reconsideration shall be filed or

entertained in this case. See 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(3)(E).

Case: 09-73278 01/21/2010 Page: 2 of 2 DktEntry: 7202046 Case 3:09-cv-01925-SI Document 7 Filed 01/29/10 Page 2 of 2