Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca5-15-51067/USCOURTS-ca5-15-51067-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Alexandro Silva
Appellant
United States of America
Appellee

Document Text:

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-51067

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

ALEXANDRO SILVA,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeals from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 3:14-CR-1761-1

Before JONES, WIENER, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Alexandro Silva has moved for leave 

to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 

386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011).

Silva has not filed a response. The record is not sufficiently developed to allow

us to make a fair evaluation of Silva’s claims of ineffective assistance of 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

October 21, 2016

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 15-51067 Document: 00513728382 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/21/2016
No. 15-51067

2

counsel; we therefore decline to consider the claims without prejudice to 

collateral review. See United States v. Isgar, 739 F.3d 829, 841 (5th Cir. 2014).

We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record 

reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal 

presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, the motion 

for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further 

responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 15-51067 Document: 00513728382 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/21/2016