Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-00255/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-00255-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Michael Chertoff
Defendant
Ramji Lal
Petitioner

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RAMJI LAL, )

)

)

Petitioner, )

)

v. )

)

)

MICHAEL CHERTOFF, )

)

)

Respondent. )

)

 )

1:07-cv- 00255-OWW-TAG HC 

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATION (Doc. 7)

ORDER GRANTING RESPONDENT’S

MOTION TO DISMISS (Doc. 6)

ORDER DISMISSING PETITION FOR WRIT

OF HABEAS CORPUS (Doc. 1)

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT

TO ENTER JUDGMENT

On February 15, 2007, Petitioner filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 2241. (Doc. 1).

On May 1, 2007, Respondent filed a motion to dismiss the petition. (Doc. 6). On June

28, 2007, the Magistrate Judge assigned to the case filed a Findings and Recommendation

recommending the motion to dismiss be granted and that the petition for writ of habeas corpus be

dismissed as moot because Petitioner had been released from Respondent’s custody. (Doc. 7). 

This Findings and Recommendation was served on all parties and contained notice that any

objections were to be filed within twenty days from the date of service of that order. To date, no

party has filed objections.

Case 1:07-cv-00255-OWW -TAG Document 8 Filed 07/30/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted

a de novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court concludes that

the Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendation is supported by the record and proper

analysis. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendation filed June 28, 2007 (Doc. 7), is ADOPTED

IN FULL;

2. Respondent’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 6), is GRANTED;

3. This petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. 1), is DISMISSED as MOOT; and,

4. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to ENTER JUDGMENT and close the file. 

This order terminates the action in its entirety. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 27, 2007 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger 

emm0d6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:07-cv-00255-OWW -TAG Document 8 Filed 07/30/07 Page 2 of 2