Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-15-01709/USCOURTS-ca4-15-01709-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Baltimore City
Appellee
City Council
Appellee
Cornell D.M. Judge Cornish
Appellant
Mayor and President of the City Council
Appellee

Document Text:

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-1709

CORNELL D.M. JUDGE CORNISH,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

BALTIMORE CITY; CITY COUNCIL; MAYOR AND PRESIDENT OF THE 

CITY COUNCIL,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

Maryland, at Baltimore. George L. Russell, III, District Judge. 

(1:14-cv-03117-GLR)

Submitted: October 20, 2015 Decided: October 22, 2015

Before MOTZ, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Cornell D.M. Judge Cornish, Appellant Pro Se. Frederic Nelson 

Smalkin, Jr., Assistant Solicitor, BALTIMORE CITY LAW 

DEPARTMENT, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 15-1709 Doc: 19 Filed: 10/22/2015 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Cornell D.M. Judge Cornish appeals the district court’s 

orders dismissing his complaint for failure to state a claim 

upon which relief could be granted, and denying reconsideration. 

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district 

court. Cornish v. Balt. City, No. 1:14-cv-03117-GLR (D. Md. May 

15, 2015, June 26, 2015). We grant Cornish’s motion for leave 

to file a reply brief exceeding this Court’s length limitations

and deny his motion to add copyrighted work to the appeal. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Appeal: 15-1709 Doc: 19 Filed: 10/22/2015 Pg: 2 of 2