Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_18-cv-03062/USCOURTS-caed-2_18-cv-03062-4/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
California Bureau of Automotive Repair
Defendant
Charles Scales
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

CHARLES SCALES, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

CALIFORNIA BUREAU OF 

AUTOMOTIVE REPAIR, 

Defendant. 

No. 2:18-cv-03062-MCE-CKD PS 

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 

By order filed November 21, 2019, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed and twenty-eight 

days leave to file an amended complaint was granted. The twenty-eight-day period has now 

expired, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without 

prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). 

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen after 

being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with 

the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and 

///// 

///// 

///// 

Case 2:18-cv-03062-MCE-CKD Document 19 Filed 01/24/20 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2 

Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time 

waives the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 

1991). 

Dated: January 24, 2020 

16.scales.3062.fta 

Case 2:18-cv-03062-MCE-CKD Document 19 Filed 01/24/20 Page 2 of 2