Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-01824/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-01824-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Donald Edward Anderson
Plaintiff
Alfred Campos
Defendant
City Of Fresno
Defendant
Fresno Police Department
Defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

____________________________

Stipulation Regarding Continuance

Rosemary T. McGuire, Esq. Bar No. 172549

Erica M. Camarena, Esq. Bar No. 227981

THE LAW FIRM OF

WEAKLEY, RATLIFF,

ARENDT & McGUIRE, LLP

1630 East Shaw Avenue, Suite 176

Fresno, California 93710

Telephone: (559) 221-5256

Facsimile: (559) 221-5262

Attorneys for Defendants, CITY OF FRESNO; FRESNO POLICE DEPARTMENT

ALFRED CAMPOS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

DONALD EDWARD ANDERSON, 

Plaintiff,

vs.

CITY OF FRESNO - FRESNO POLICE

DEPARTMENT, ALFRED CAMPOS,

individually and In His Official Capacity as a

Police Officer for the City of Fresno, and

DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, 

Defendants.

____________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO. 1:06-cv-01824-OWW-DLB

STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING

MOTION TO DISMISS PORTIONS OF FIRST

AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR FAILURE TO

STATE CLAIM; AND MOTION TO STRIKE

PRAYER FOR PUNITIVE DAMAGES 

[FRCP Rule 12(b)(6), 12(f); Local Rule 78-230] 

Date: June 4, 2007

Time: 10:00 a.m.

Courtroom: 3

It is hereby stipulated by the parties, through their respective counsel, that the hearing on

defendants Motion to Dismiss Portions of Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint and Motion to

Strike Prayer for Punitive Damages be continued from June 4, 2007 at 10:00 a.m. to July 9,

2007 at 10:00 a.m., due to the unavailability of plaintiff’s counsel on June 4, 2007.

DATED: May 31, 2007

WEAKLEY, RATLIFF, ARENDT & McGUIRE, LLP

By: /s/ Rosemary T. McGuire 

Rosemary T. McGuire

Attorney for Defendants

/ / /

Case 1:06-cv-01824-OWW -DLB Document 17 Filed 06/06/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

____________________________

Stipulation Regarding Continuance 2

DATED: May 31, 2007

THE DANIEL L. HARRALSON LAW FIRM

By: /s/ Daniel L. Harralson 

Daniel L. Harralson 

Attorney for Plaintiff

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 31, 2007 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger 

emm0d6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-01824-OWW -DLB Document 17 Filed 06/06/07 Page 2 of 2