Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-15-07065/USCOURTS-ca4-15-07065-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Eugene Smalls
Appellant
United States of America
Appellee

Document Text:

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-7065

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

EUGENE SMALLS, a/k/a Gene Smalls, a/k/a Kishawnie Henry, 

a/k/a Quickness,

 Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca Beach Smith, Chief

District Judge. (2:96-cr-00131-RBS-1)

Submitted: November 19, 2015 Decided: November 23, 2015

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Eugene Smalls, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Edward Bradenham II, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Newport News, Virginia, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 15-7065 Doc: 9 Filed: 11/23/2015 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Eugene Smalls appeals the district court’s order granting 

his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion.* We have reviewed the 

record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for 

the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. 

Smalls, No. 2:96-cr-00131-RBS-1 (E.D. Va. May 28, 2015); see 

also United States v. Smalls, 720 F.3d 193, 195-97, 199 (4th 

Cir. 2013) (absent a contrary indication, there is a presumption 

that district court, deciding a § 3582(c)(2) motion, considered 

the relevant factors). We dispense with oral argument because 

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before the court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

 * Although the district court granted Smalls’ § 3582 motion, 

the reduction granted by the court did not reduce Smalls’

sentence to the full extent he requested.

Appeal: 15-7065 Doc: 9 Filed: 11/23/2015 Pg: 2 of 2