Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_06-cv-00427/USCOURTS-cand-4_06-cv-00427-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
IL Fornaio (America) Corp.
Plaintiff
Veggetti S.R.L.
Defendant

Document Text:

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER (1) EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT, AND 

(2) CONTINUING CASE SCHEDULE AND ADR MULTI-OPTION PROGRAM DATES; CASE NO. C 06 0427 SBA 12337658.1 

Valerie M. Wagner (State Bar No. 173146) 

 valerie.wagner@dechert.com 

Halimah DeLaine (State Bar No. 237762) 

 halimah.delaine@dechert.com 

DECHERT LLP 

1117 California Ave. 

Palo Alto, CA 94304-1106 

Telephone: 650.813.4800 

Facsimile: 650.813.4848 

Attorneys for Plaintiff IL FORNAIO (AMERICA) 

CORP., a Delaware Corporation 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

OAKLAND DIVISION 

IL FORNAIO (AMERICA) CORP., a 

Delaware Corporation, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

VEGGETTI S.R.L., an Italian limited liability 

company, 

Defendant. 

Case No. C 06 0427 SBA 

STIPULATION AND ORDER (1) 

EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND 

TO COMPLAINT, AND (2) 

CONTINUING CASE SCHEDULE 

AND ADR MULTI-OPTION 

PROGRAM DATES 

Civil L.R. 6-1(b), 6-2(a), 7-12

/ / / 

/ / / 

/ / / 

/ / / 

/ / / 

/ / / 

/ / / 

/ / / 

/ / / 

/ / / 

Case 4:06-cv-00427-SBA Document 9 Filed 04/11/06 Page 1 of 4
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER (1) EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT, AND 

(2) CONTINUING CASE SCHEDULE AND ADR MULTI-OPTION PROGRAM DATES; CASE NO. C 06 0427 SBA 12337658.1 

1

RECITALS

WHEREAS, the Complaint in this matter was filed on January 23, 2006; and 

WHEREAS, a copy of the Complaint and related papers were received by Defendant at its 

legal address in Milan, Italy by Express Mail on March 13, 2006; and 

WHEREAS, Defendant’s response to the Complaint was due on April 3, 2006; and 

WHEREAS, because the parties have been, and still are, engaged in settlement discussions, 

they agreed to an initial extension of time equal to seven (7) days for Defendant to answer, move 

against, or otherwise respond to the Complaint, bringing the new response deadline to April 10, 

2006; and 

WHEREAS, in light of the ongoing settlement discussions, they have agreed upon and 

request a further extension of time equal to fourteen (14) days for Defendant to answer, move 

against, or otherwise respond to the Complaint, bringing the new response deadline to April 24, 

2006; and 

WHEREAS, under the circumstances, the parties further request a continuance of (1) the 

deadline for filing the Joint ADR Certification with Stipulation to ADR Process or Notice of Need 

for ADR Phone Conference; (2) the deadline for filing the Case Management Statement and Rule 

26(f) Report; and (3) the Case Management Conference, currently set for April 26, 2006, to a date in 

early June 2006. 

BASED ON THE FOREGOING, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED pursuant 

to Civil L.R. 6-1(b) and 6-2(a), by and between the parties, through their respective counsel, that 

Defendant shall have an additional extension of time equal to fourteen (14) days, to and including 

April 24, 2006, to answer, move against, or otherwise respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint. It is further 

stipulated and agreed that the Court should extend the deadlines for the parties’ filing of the Joint 

ADR Certification, the Case Management Statement, and the Rule 26(f) Report as set forth in its 

Order below. The total extension of time to answer, move against, or otherwise respond to the 

/ / / 

/ / / 

/ / / 

Case 4:06-cv-00427-SBA Document 9 Filed 04/11/06 Page 2 of 4
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER (1) EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT, AND 

(2) CONTINUING CASE SCHEDULE AND ADR MULTI-OPTION PROGRAM DATES; CASE NO. C 06 0427 SBA 12337658.1 

2

Complaint does not exceed thirty (30) days. Good cause exists for this extension in order to permit 

the parties to continue, and hopefully complete, their settlement discussions. 

 Respectfully submitted, 

Dated: April 7, 2006 DECHERT LLP 

By: /s/Valerie M. Wagner 

VALERIE M. WAGNER 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

IL FORNAIO (AMERICA) CORP. 

Dated: April 7, 2006 THELEN REID & PRIEST LLP 

By: /s/Robert A. Weikert 

ROBERT A. WEIKERT 

Attorneys for Defendant 

VEGGETTI S.R.L. 

I, Valerie M. Wagner, hereby attest, pursuant to N.D. Cal. General Order No. 45, that the 

concurrence to the filing of this document has been obtained from each signatory hereto. 

/s/Valerie M. Wagner 

VALERIE M. WAGNER 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

IL FORNAIO (AMERICA) CORP. 

Case 4:06-cv-00427-SBA Document 9 Filed 04/11/06 Page 3 of 4
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER (1) EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT, AND 

(2) CONTINUING CASE SCHEDULE AND ADR MULTI-OPTION PROGRAM DATES; CASE NO. C 06 0427 SBA 12337658.1 

3

ORDER

PURSUANT TO THE ABOVE STIPULATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT 

Defendant shall have up to and including April 24, 2006, to answer, move against, or otherwise 

respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint. The parties may not further extend this deadline without prior 

leave of Court. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT the Case Management Conference currently scheduled 

for April 26, 2006 at 3:00 p.m. is hereby CONTINUED to May 24, 2006 at 2:45 p.m. The parties 

shall file their ADR Certification, Case Management Statement, and Rule 26(f) Report by no later 

than May 13, 2006. The Court is not inclined to grant any further continuance. 

Dated: April 11, 2006 

 SAUNDRA B. ARMSTRONG 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 

Case 4:06-cv-00427-SBA Document 9 Filed 04/11/06 Page 4 of 4