Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-01410/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-01410-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Alamdeep Kaur
Plaintiff
Office Depot, Inc.
Defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ALAMDEEP KAUR,

Plaintiff,

v.

OFFICE DEPOT, INC.,

Defendant.

Case No. 16-cv-01410-JST 

SCHEDULING ORDER

The Court hereby sets the following case deadlines pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil 

Procedure 16 and Civil Local Rule 16-10:

Event Deadline

Deadline to add parties or amend the pleadings June 30, 2016

Parties to submit proposed first-stage discovery and mediation 

deadline July 8, 2016

Fact discovery cut-off December 16, 2016

Deadline to file dispositive motions January 18, 2017

Expert disclosures March 31, 2017

Expert rebuttal April 22, 2017

Expert discovery cut-off May 15, 2017

Pretrial conference statement due May 23, 2017

Pretrial conference June 2, 2017 at 2:00 

p.m.

Case 3:16-cv-01410-JST Document 11 Filed 06/29/16 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

Event Deadline

Trial June 26, 2017 at 8:30 

a.m.

Estimate of trial length (in days) Eight

This case will be tried to a jury. 

Counsel may not modify these dates without leave of court. The parties shall comply with 

the Court’s standing orders, which are available at cand.uscourts.gov/jstorders.

The parties must take all necessary steps to conduct discovery, compel discovery, hire 

counsel, retain experts, and manage their calendars so that they can complete discovery in a timely 

manner and appear at trial on the noticed and scheduled dates. All counsel must arrange their 

calendars to accommodate these dates, or arrange to substitute or associate in counsel who can. 

Trial dates set by this Court should be regarded as firm. Requests for continuance are 

disfavored. The Court will not consider any event subsequently scheduled by a party, partycontrolled witness, expert or attorney that conflicts with the above trial date as good cause to grant 

a continuance. The Court will not consider the pendency of settlement discussions as good cause 

to grant a continuance. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 29, 2016

_______________________________________

JON S. TIGAR

United States District Judge

Case 3:16-cv-01410-JST Document 11 Filed 06/29/16 Page 2 of 2