Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-07-01827/USCOURTS-ca4-07-01827-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Genesis Healthcare Corporation
Appellee
Brenda Roberts
Appellant

Document Text:

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-1827

BRENDA ROBERTS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

GENESIS HEALTHCARE CORPORATION,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. William D. Quarles, Jr., District Judge.

(1:06-cv-02305-WDQ)

Submitted: May 14, 2008 Decided: June 10, 2008

Before MICHAEL, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Clarence Connelly, Jr., Washington, D.C., for Appellant. J.

Michael McGuire, Darryl G. McCallum, SHAWE & ROSENTHAL, LLP,

Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 07-1827 Doc: 31 Filed: 06/10/2008 Pg: 1 of 3
*Although Roberts requested that the district court reconsider

its decision by filing a timely motion pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P.

59(e), her appellate brief does not challenge the court’s denial of

that motion. Accordingly, we have not considered on appeal any

issue relating to the denial of Roberts’ Rule 59(e) motion. See

Edwards v. City of Goldsboro, 178 F.3d 231, 241 n.6 (4th Cir.

1999).

- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Brenda Roberts appeals the district court’s order

granting summary judgment to Genesis Healthcare Corporation

(“Genesis”), and dismissing her employment discrimination claims,

filed pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as

amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e - 2000e-17 (2000), and the Age

Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, 29 U.S.C. §§ 621-634

(2000).*

 Roberts alleged that, in terminating her employment,

Genesis discriminated against her on the basis of her race

(African-American) and her age. Roberts also appeals the district

court’s grant of summary judgment on Roberts’ claim for

compensation for her accrued, unused vacation time, filed pursuant

to Md. Code Ann., Lab. & Empl. § 3-505 (LexisNexis 1999). 

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. Roberts v. Genesis Healthcare Corp., No. 1:06-cv-02305-WDQ

(D. Md. Apr. 23, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the

Appeal: 07-1827 Doc: 31 Filed: 06/10/2008 Pg: 2 of 3
- 3 -

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

 AFFIRMED

Appeal: 07-1827 Doc: 31 Filed: 06/10/2008 Pg: 3 of 3