Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_15-cv-00002/USCOURTS-caed-1_15-cv-00002-2/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Commissioner of Social Security
Defendant
Esther D. Rosas
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ESTHER D. ROSAS,

Plaintiff,

v.

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,

Defendant.

Case No. 1:15-cv-00002-LJO-SAB

ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO 

SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS ACTION 

SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR 

FAILURE TO PROSECUTE

RESPONSE DUE WITHIN FIVE DAYS

Plaintiff Esther D. Rosas filed a complaint on January 3, 2015. On January 6, 2015, a 

scheduling order issued. The scheduling order states that within 95 days from the filing of the 

administrative record, Plaintiff shall file an opening brief. Defendant lodged the Social Security 

administrative record on June 30, 2015. (ECF No. 15.) More than 95 days have passed and 

Plaintiff has not filed an opening brief nor sought an extension of time to do so. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff shall file a written response to 

this order to show cause why this action should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute within 

five (5) days of the date of service of this order. Failure to comply with this order to show cause 

shall result in this action being dismissed for failure to prosecute.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 20, 2015 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:15-cv-00002-LJO-SAB Document 19 Filed 10/20/15 Page 1 of 1