Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_15-cv-00474/USCOURTS-caed-1_15-cv-00474-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Equifax, Inc.
Defendant
Experian Information Solutions, Inc.
Defendant
Mohamed Masad
Plaintiff
Trans Union
Defendant

Document Text:

-1-

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

FRESNO DIVISION

MOHAMED MASAD,

Plaintiff,

v.

TRANS UNION; EXPERIAN 

INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC.; 

and EQUIFAX, INC.

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: 1:15-cv-474-KJM-GSA

ORDER TO SHOW WHY THIS 

CASE SHOULD NOT BE 

DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO 

COMPLY WITH THIS COURT’S 

ORDER

(Doc. 15)

On June 26, 2015, Plaintiff, Mohamed Masad (“Plaintiff”), and Defendant 

Equifax Inc., filed a stipulation of dismissal, dismissing Equifax from this action 

with prejudice. (Doc. 13). On July 7, 2015, this Court issued a minute order 

ordering that no later than July 31, 2015, Plaintiff shall either: (1) file notices of 

dismissal with regard to Trans Union and Experian Information Solutions, the 

remaining two defendants in this action, or (2) if Plaintiff intends to pursue this 

litigation, show proof of service that these two defendants had been served. (Doc. 

Case 1:15-cv-00474-KJM-GSA Document 16 Filed 08/11/15 Page 1 of 2
-2-

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

15). Plaintiff was advised that failure to comply with this order would result in 

dismissal of this action. To date, Plaintiff has failed to comply with this order.

Accordingly, no later than September 4, 2015, Plaintiff shall file a written 

response to this Order to Show Cause why this case should not be dismissed for 

failing to prosecute this action. In the response, Plaintiff shall explain the reason 

for failing to comply with this Court’s order. If Plaintiff wishes to provide the 

information initially requested by the Court, or request additional time to comply, 

he may do so in the response.

Plaintiff is advised that failure to respond to this Order to Show Cause will 

result in dismissal of this action.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 11, 2015 /s/ Gary S. Austin 

 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:15-cv-00474-KJM-GSA Document 16 Filed 08/11/15 Page 2 of 2