Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_16-cv-01486/USCOURTS-caed-1_16-cv-01486-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Herta Cartagena
Plaintiff
Hien N. Pham
Defendant
Jennifer N. Pham
Defendant

Document Text:

-1-

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANTS HIEN N. PHAM AND JENNIFER N. PHAM TO RESPOND TO 

PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ARTHUR W. CURLEY, BAR NO. 60902

MARK R. GIBSON, BAR NO. 212222

BRADLEY, CURLEY, BARRABEE, & KOWALSKI, P.C.

1100 Larkspur Landing Circle, Suite 200

Larkspur, California 94939

Telephone: (415) 464-8888

Facsimile: (415) 464-8887

Attorneys for Defendants

HIEN N. PHAM and JENNIFER N. PHAM

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

HERTA CARTAGENA,

Plaintiff,

v.

HIEN N. PHAM and JENNIFER N. PHAM,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. 1:16-cv-01486-AWI-EPG

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR 

DEFENDANTS HIEN N. PHAM AND 

JENNIFER N. PHAM TO RESPOND TO 

PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto through their 

respective attorneys that Defendants HIEN N. PHAM and JENNIFER N. PHAM may have 

additional time within which to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint. Therefore, 

the last day for said Defendants to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint is

Thursday, November 17, 2016.

Good cause exists for this extension as defense counsel requires additional time to 

become sufficiently knowledgeable about this action to prepare an initial pleading.

This document is being electronically filed through the Court’s ECF System. In this 

Case 1:16-cv-01486-AWI-EPG Document 9 Filed 11/01/16 Page 1 of 3
-2-

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANTS HIEN N. PHAM AND JENNIFER N. PHAM TO RESPOND TO 

PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

regard, counsel for the aforementioned Defendants attests as follows: (1) the contents of this 

document are acceptable to all persons required to sign the document; (2) Plaintiff’s counsel has 

concurred with the filing of this document; and (3) a record supporting this concurrence is

available for inspection or production, if so ordered by this Court.

Respectfully submitted,

Dated: October 28, 2016 BRADLEY, CURLEY, BARRABEE, & 

KOWALSKI, P.C.

By: /s/ 

MARK R. GIBSON

Attorneys for Defendants

HIEN N. PHAM and JENNIFER N. PHAM

Dated: October 28, 2016 LAYNE HAYDEN ATTORNEY AT LAW

By: /s/ 

LAYNE ERIC HAYDEN

Attorneys for Plaintiff

HERTA CARTAGENA

Case 1:16-cv-01486-AWI-EPG Document 9 Filed 11/01/16 Page 2 of 3
-3-

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANTS HIEN N. PHAM AND JENNIFER N. PHAM TO RESPOND TO 

PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, IT IS SO ORDERED. Defendants HIEN N. 

PHAM and JENNIFER N. PHAM should answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint filed by 

Plaintiff on or before Thursday, November 17, 2016.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 31, 2016 /s/

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:16-cv-01486-AWI-EPG Document 9 Filed 11/01/16 Page 3 of 3