Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-16-01675/USCOURTS-ca4-16-01675-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Charles T. Lee
Appellant
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Appellee

Document Text:

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-1675

CHARLES T. LEE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Martin K. Reidinger, 

District Judge. (1:13-cv-00004-MR-DSC)

Submitted: October 31, 2016 Decided: November 21, 2016

Before NIEMEYER, DIAZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Charles T. Lee, Appellant Pro Se. Dustin Matthew Dow, John Bruce 

Lewis, BAKER & HOSTETLER, LLP, Cleveland, Ohio, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 16-1675 Doc: 11 Filed: 11/21/2016 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Charles T. Lee appeals the district court’s order granting 

the Appellee’s motion for summary judgment and dismissing his 

complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible 

error. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis 

and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Lee v. 

Norfolk S. Ry. Co., No. 1:13-cv-00004-MR-DSC (W.D.N.C. May 11, 

2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Appeal: 16-1675 Doc: 11 Filed: 11/21/2016 Pg: 2 of 2