Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cr-00284/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cr-00284-10/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Mohammad Adil
Defendant
Akram Sabar Chaudhry
Defendant
Adil Mohammad
Defendant
Akram Sabar
Defendant
USA
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

KEVIN V. RYAN (CASBN 118321)

United States Attorney

EUMI L. CHOI (WVSBN 0722)

Chief, Criminal Division

BLAKE D. STAMM (CTBN 301887)

Assistant United States Attorney

450 Golden Gate Avenue, Box 36055

San Francisco, California 94102

Telephone: (415) 436-7210

Fax: (415) 436-7234

Attorneys for Plaintiff

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

AKRAM SABAR CHAUDHRY,

a.k.a. Akram Sabar, and 

MOHAMMAD ADIL

a.k.a. Adil Mohammad,

 

Defendants. 

 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CR 05 00284 SI

[PROPOSED] ORDER EXCLUDING

TIME FROM THE SPEEDY TRIAL ACT

CALCULATION (18 U.S.C. §

3161(h)(8)(A)) FROM FEBRUARY 17,

2006 TO MARCH 24, 2006

On February 17, 2006, the United States and defendants Akram Chaudhry and

Mohammad Adil through their respective attorneys Steven F. Gruel and Marc Axelbaum

stipulated in open court, and the Court so orders, that the time period between February 17, 2006

and March 24, 2006 shall be excluded from the calculation of time in which the trial of the

captioned matter must commence pursuant to the Speedy Trial Act. This period of time is

excluded pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 3161(h)(8)(A) to permit the parties sufficient time to prepare

effectively for trial in light of discovery and continuity of counsel. The parties agree and the

Court finds that the ends of justice served by the exclusion of time outweigh the best interest of

the public and the defendants in a speedy trial, all pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 3161(h)(8)(A). 

Case 3:05-cr-00284-SI Document 50 Filed 02/23/2006 Page 1 of 2
 Case 3:05-cr-00284-SI Document 52 Filed 03/02/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Accordingly, with the agreement of the parties and upon the findings above, the Court enters

this order scheduling a trial setting appearance or motions hearing on March 24, 2006 and

excludes the intervening period of time between February 17, 2006 to March 24, 2006. 

DATED: February 23, 2006 Respectfully Submitted

KEVIN V. RYAN

United States Attorney

 /S/ 

BLAKE D. STAMM

Assistant United States Attorney

SO ORDERED.

DATED: ______________ _______________________________

HON. SUSAN ILLSTON 

United States District Judge

Case 3:05-cr-00284-SI Document 50 Filed 02/23/2006 Page 2 of 2
 Case 3:05-cr-00284-SI Document 52 Filed 03/02/06 Page 2 of 2