Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_10-cv-00149/USCOURTS-caed-2_10-cv-00149-3/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Kevin Decker
Plaintiff
Susan Gauther
Defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KEVIN DECKER,

Plaintiff, No. 2:10-cv-0149 JFM (PC)

vs.

SUSAN GAUTHER,

Defendant. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

A recent court order was served on plaintiff’s address of record and returned by

the postal service. It appears that plaintiff has failed to comply with Local Rule 182(f), which

requires that a party appearing in propria persona inform the court of any address change.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed for

plaintiff's failure to keep the court apprised of his current address. See Local Rules 182(f) and

110.

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen

days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written

objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s

Findings and Recommendations.” Any response to the objections shall be filed and served

Case 2:10-cv-00149-GEB -JFM Document 11 Filed 08/10/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

within fourteen days after service of the objections. Plaintiff is advised that failure to file

objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. 

Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: August 9, 2010.

/014;deck0149.33a

Case 2:10-cv-00149-GEB -JFM Document 11 Filed 08/10/10 Page 2 of 2