Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caDC-15-05126/USCOURTS-caDC-15-05126-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Scott S. Harris
Appellee
Gary Hirsch
Appellant
United States of America
Appellee

Document Text:

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

____________

No. 15-5126 September Term, 2015

1:15-cv-00488-UNA

Filed On: August 1, 2016

Gary Hirsch,

Appellant

v.

Scott S. Harris, Clerk of Supreme Court of the

United States and United States of America,

Appellees

ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

BEFORE: Griffith and Srinivasan, Circuit Judges; Ginsburg, Senior Circuit

Judge

J U D G M E N T

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court

for the District of Columbia and on appellant’s brief. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); D.C.

Cir. Rule 34(j). It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s order filed April 6, 2015, be

affirmed. The district court correctly held it has no authority to order the Clerk of the

Supreme Court to transmit a document to a Supreme Court Justice or to take any other

action. See Marin v. Suter, 956 F.2d 339 (D.C. Cir. 1992) (per curiam). 

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk

is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution

of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R. App.

P. 41(b); D.C. Cir. Rule 41.

Per Curiam

FOR THE COURT:

Mark J. Langer, Clerk 

BY: /s/

Ken Meadows 

Deputy Clerk

USCA Case #15-5126 Document #1627854 Filed: 08/01/2016 Page 1 of 1