Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-16-06361/USCOURTS-ca4-16-06361-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
United States of America
Appellee
Phillip James Williams
Appellant

Document Text:

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-6361

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

PHILLIP JAMES WILLIAMS, a/k/a D, a/k/a PJ,

 Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Florence. Terry L. Wooten, Chief District 

Judge. (4:09-cr-00073-TLW-1)

Submitted: June 23, 2016 Decided: June 29, 2016

Before MOTZ, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Philip James Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Frank Daley, 

Jr., Jimmie Ewing, Stanley D. Ragsdale, Assistant United States 

Attorneys, Columbia, South Carolina; Arthur Bradley Parham, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South Carolina, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 16-6361 Doc: 7 Filed: 06/29/2016 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Phillip James Williams appeals the district court’s order 

denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for a sentence 

reduction under Amendment 780 to the Sentencing Guidelines. We 

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district 

court. See United States v. Williams, No. 4:09-cr-00073-TLW-1 

(D.S.C. filed Feb. 29, 2016, entered Mar. 1, 2016). We dispense 

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Appeal: 16-6361 Doc: 7 Filed: 06/29/2016 Pg: 2 of 2