Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca5-19-10511/USCOURTS-ca5-19-10511-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Anthony Roy Brown
Appellant
United States of America
Appellee

Document Text:

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-10511

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

ANTHONY ROY BROWN,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:18-CR-310-1

Before CLEMENT, GRAVES, and OLDHAM, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Anthony Roy Brown has moved for 

leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 

386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011).

Brown has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant 

portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Brown’s response. We concur 

with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

February 11, 2020

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 19-10511 Document: 00515306642 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/11/2020
No. 19-10511

2

appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is 

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the 

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. Brown’s request for substitute 

counsel or to proceed pro se is DENIED. See United States v. Wagner, 158 F.3d 

901, 902-03 (5th Cir. 1998).

Case: 19-10511 Document: 00515306642 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/11/2020