Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-07-07344/USCOURTS-ca4-07-07344-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Johney Freeman
Appellant
United States of America
Appellee

Document Text:

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-7344

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

JOHNEY FREEMAN,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. J. Calvitt Clarke, Jr., Senior

District Judge; Rebecca Beach Smith, District Judge. (2:88-cr00076-jcc; 2:97-cv-00409-jcc)

Submitted: November 15, 2007 Decided: November 27, 2007

Before WILLIAMS, Chief Judge, and MOTZ and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Johney Freeman, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Joseph Seidel, Jr.,

Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 07-7344 Doc: 11 Filed: 11/27/2007 Pg: 1 of 2
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Johney Freeman appeals the district court’s marginal

orders denying his “Motion to Correct Clerical Errors” and

“Supplemental Affidavit In Support of Motion.” Relying on Fed. R.

Crim. P. 35(a) and 36, Freeman seeks to alter the district court’s

docket entries and other notations related to his civil actions

dismissed in 1994 and 1997. The criminal rules upon which Freeman

relies provide him no relief in altering the district court’s

treatment of his civil actions. See United States v. Fraley, 988

F.2d 4, 5-6 (4th Cir. 1993) (noting limited scope of Criminal Rules

35 and 36). Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Appeal: 07-7344 Doc: 11 Filed: 11/27/2007 Pg: 2 of 2