Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-03887/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-03887-7/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Heller Ehrman LLP
Appellee
Paravue Corporation
Appellant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-1-

STIPULATED REQUEST AND ORDER CHANGING DEADLINES 

TO FILE ANSWERING AND REPLY BRIEFS

(Paravue Corporation v. Heller Ehrman LLP, No. 3:14-CV-3887 CRB) 

MARJORIE E. MANNING, SBN 118643

T. D. BOLLING, JR., SBN 33236

BOLLING & GAWTHROP

A Professional Corporation

8880 Cal Center Drive, Suite 190

Sacramento, California 95826

Telephone: (916) 369-0777

Facsimile: (916) 369-2698

E-mail: mem@bwg-inc.com

E-mail: tdb@bwg-inc.com

THOMAS A. WILLOUGHBY, State Bar No. 137597

FELDERSTEIN FITZGERALD

WILLOUGHBY & PASCUZZI LLP

400 Capitol Mall, Suite 1750

Sacramento, CA 95814

Telephone: (916) 329-7400

Facsimile: (916) 329-7435

E-mail: twilloughby@ffwplaw.com

Attorneys for Appellee Heller Ehrman LLP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Paravue Corporation, 

 Appellant, 

vs.

In re Heller Ehrman LLP, 

Appellee.

CASE NO. 3:14-CV-03887-CRB

Honorable Charles R. Breyer

STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER 

CHANGING DEADLINES TO FILE 

ANSWERING BRIEF AND REPLY BRIEF

ORDER 

 

Pursuant to Local Rule 7-12, Appellant Paravue Corporation and Appellee Postconfirmation Liquidating Debtor Heller Ehrman LLP, by and through their respective counsel, 

Case 3:14-cv-03887-CRB Document 39 Filed 04/20/15 Page 1 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-2-

STIPULATED REQUEST AND ORDER CHANGING DEADLINES

TO FILE ANSWERING AND REPLY BRIEFS

(Paravue Corporation v Heller Ehrman LLP, No. 3:14-CV-3887 CRB)

 

stipulate and agree to an extension of the briefing deadlines applicable to Appellee’s answering 

brief and Appellant’s reply brief, in the respects stated herein.

In support of this stipulation, Marjorie E. Manning, the undersigned counsel for Appellee, 

states and declares as follows:

1. I am an attorney licensed to practice law in the State of California and in this 

Court, and am counsel of record in this proceeding for Appellee Heller Ehrman. This declaration 

is made pursuant to Local Rule 6-2 in support of the parties’ stipulation to extend the briefing 

schedule in this matter pertaining to Appellee’s answering brief and Appellant’s reply brief.

2. Paravue filed its opening brief in this matter on March 16, 2015. By previous 

order of the Court, Heller Ehrman’s answering brief is due by May 4, 2015 and Paravue’s reply 

brief is due by May 18, 2015. 

3. Within a few days after Paravue filed its opening brief, I was diagnosed with 

bacterial bronchopneumonia, prescribed various medications including antibiotics, and have been 

under a physician’s care since then. My symptoms have finally improved and I am feeling better. 

However, this illness significantly curtailed my ability to work in the interim. Accordingly, on 

April 13, 2015 I contacted Paravue’s counsel James Weixel to request his agreement to a 31-day 

extension of the briefing deadline governing Appellee’s answering brief. Mr. Weixel graciously 

agreed to my request.

4. As stated in the stipulation below, the parties have stipulated and agreed to the 

following revised briefing schedule as appropriate and reasonable:

Appellee’s answering brief due: June 2, 2015

Appellant’s reply brief due: June 16, 2015

5. There have been four previous stipulations for an extended briefing schedule, all 

requested by Appellant Paravue. After the fourth stipulated extension, this Court on its own 

motion extended the then-existing briefing schedule by three weeks (Doc. 35), resulting in the 

deadlines referenced in paragraph 3 above.

6. The requested extension would cause the briefing schedule governing the 

answering and reply briefs to be extended by 31 days. 

Case 3:14-cv-03887-CRB Document 39 Filed 04/20/15 Page 2 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-3-

STIPULATED REQUEST AND ORDER CHANGING DEADLINES

TO FILE ANSWERING AND REPLY BRIEFS

(Paravue Corporation v Heller Ehrman LLP, No. 3:14-CV-3887 CRB)

 

I hereby declare under penalty of perjury pursuant to the laws of the United States and the 

State of California that the foregoing is true and correct, that I have personal knowledge of the 

facts set forth herein, and if called as a witness in this matter I could and would testify 

competently thereto. Executed this 15th day of April 2015 at Sacramento, California.

__/s/ Marjorie E. Manning_____

Marjorie E. Manning

STIPULATION

Appellant Paravue Corporation and Appellee Post-Confirmation Liquidating Debtor 

Heller Ehrman LLP, by and through their respective undersigned counsel, stipulate and agree, and 

thereupon request that this Court enter an order accordingly, extending the briefing schedule in 

the appeal before this Court as follows:

Appellee’s answering brief due: June 2, 2015

Appellant’s reply brief due: June 16, 2015

This stipulation is made upon the declaration of Marjorie E. Manning, counsel for Heller 

Ehrman in this proceeding, as stated supra.

The parties stipulate and agree to this briefing schedule and request that the Court enter an 

order accordingly, pursuant to Local Rules 6-2 and 7-12.

DATED: April 16, 2015 BOLLING & GAWTHROP

By: __/s/ Marjorie E. Manning_____

Marjorie E. Manning

Attorneys for Appellee Heller Ehrman LLP

DATED: April 16, 2015 WEIXEL LAW OFFICE

By: __/s/ James V. Weixel_____

James V. Weixel

Attorneys for Appellant Paravue Corporation 

Case 3:14-cv-03887-CRB Document 39 Filed 04/20/15 Page 3 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-4-

STIPULATED REQUEST AND ORDER CHANGING DEADLINES

TO FILE ANSWERING AND REPLY BRIEFS

(Paravue Corporation v Heller Ehrman LLP, No. 3:14-CV-3887 CRB)

 

ATTESTATION RE ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE(S)

I, Marjorie E. Manning, counsel for Appellee Heller Ehrman, hereby attest pursuant to 

Local Rule 5-1(i)(3) that the electronic signature(s) of other counsel and/or parties appearing 

above indicate(s) that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from each of 

said counsel and/or parties, and that such electronic signature(s) serve(s) in lieu of said 

signature(s) on the document.

DATED: April 16, 2015 BOLLING & GAWTHROP

By: __/s/ Marjorie E. Manning_____

Marjorie E. Manning

Attorneys for Appellee Heller Ehrman LLP 

ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Signed: April 17, 2015 ________________________ __

CHARLES R. BREYER

United States District Court Judge

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Charles R. Breyer

Case 3:14-cv-03887-CRB Document 39 Filed 04/20/15 Page 4 of 4