Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-02109/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-02109-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
John Doe
Defendant
Richard Rockwell
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RICHARD ROCKWELL,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-2109 GEB DAD P

vs.

JOHN DOE, et al.,

Defendants. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

By order filed August 19, 2005, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed and forty-five

days leave to file an amended complaint was granted. Plaintiff was cautioned that failure to do

so would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. The forty-five day period has

now expired, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the

court’s order.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed

without prejudice. See Local Rule 11-110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty

days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written

objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s

Case 2:04-cv-02109-GEB-DAD Document 6 Filed 10/13/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the

specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951

F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: October 12, 2005.

DAD:lg

rock2109.fta

Case 2:04-cv-02109-GEB-DAD Document 6 Filed 10/13/05 Page 2 of 2