Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-02170/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-02170-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Lee Albert Samprath
Petitioner
Santa Clara Superior Courts
Respondent

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LEE ALBERT SAMPRATH,

Petitioner, No. CIV S-05-2170 LKK GGH P

vs.

SANTA CLARA SUPERIOR COURTS,

Respondent. ORDER

 /

Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of

habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States

Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On November 16, 2005, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations

herein which were served on petitioner and which contained notice to petitioner that any

objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Petitioner

has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be

supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY

ORDERED that:

/////

Case 2:05-cv-02170-LKK -GGH Document 7 Filed 01/30/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

1. The findings and recommendations filed November 16, 2005, are adopted in

full; and

2. Petitioner’s application for a writ of habeas corpus is dismissed for failure to

exhaust state remedies.

DATED: January 30, 2006.

/s/Lawrence K. Karlton 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

/samp2170.800

Case 2:05-cv-02170-LKK -GGH Document 7 Filed 01/30/06 Page 2 of 2