Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-16-06835/USCOURTS-ca4-16-06835-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Harold W. Clarke
Appellee
Shain Claude Collins
Appellant

Document Text:

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-6835

SHAIN CLAUDE COLLINS,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director, Department of Corrections,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Glen E. Conrad, Chief 

District Judge. (7:13-cv-00474-GEC)

Submitted: November 22, 2016 Decided: November 28, 2016

Before DIAZ and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Shain Claude Collins, Appellant Pro Se. Craig Stallard, 

Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 16-6835 Doc: 9 Filed: 11/28/2016 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Shain Claude Collins seeks to appeal the district court’s 

order denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion. Collins argued 

in his notice of appeal, and the record suggests, that he did 

not timely receive notice of the entry of the district court’s 

order, and further requested a reopening of the appeal period. 

See Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6)(A). Because the 30-day appeal 

period is jurisdictional, Bowles v. Russell, 551 U.S. 205, 214 

(2007), we remand the case for the limited purpose of allowing 

the district court to determine whether to reopen the time to 

file an appeal, pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6).

REMANDED

Appeal: 16-6835 Doc: 9 Filed: 11/28/2016 Pg: 2 of 2