Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca8-14-03310/USCOURTS-ca8-14-03310-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Clifton Fantroy
Appellee
Mike Holmes
Appellee
Steve Linniweber
Appellee
Thomas Linniweber
Appellee
Linda Miller-Hunhoff
Appellee
Jennie Peterson
Appellee
Troy Ponto
Appellee
Kayla Stekelberg
Appellee
Jesse Claude Tiedeman
Appellant
Heather Veld
Appellee
Douglas L. Weber
Appellee

Document Text:

United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 14-3310

___________________________

Jesse Claude Tiedeman

lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant

v.

Douglas L. Weber, Director of Prison Operations at South Dakota State

Penitentiary; Troy Ponto, Assoc. Warden; Clifton Fantroy, Unit Manager; Jennie

Peterson, Unit Coordinator; Heather Veld, Case Manager; Linda Miller-Hunhoff,

Mailroom Supervisor; Kayla Stekelberg, Unit Coordinator; Mike Holmes, License

Plates Supervisor; Steve Linniweber, Corrections Officer; Thomas Linniweber,

Corrections Officer

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees

____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the District of South Dakota - Sioux Falls

____________

 Submitted: June 16, 2015

Filed: June 23, 2015

[Unpublished]

____________

Before SHEPHERD, BYE, and KELLY, Circuit Judges. 

____________

PER CURIAM.

Appellate Case: 14-3310 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/23/2015 Entry ID: 4287706 
Jesse Tiedeman appeals the district court’s adverse grant of summary

1

judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action asserting access-to-courts and conspiracy

claims. Upon careful de novo review, see Peterson v. Kopp, 754 F.3d 594, 598 (8th

Cir. 2014) (standard of review), we conclude that the district court’s summary

judgment decision was proper, see Hartsfield v. Nichols, 511 F.3d 826, 831-32 (8th

Cir. 2008) (access-to-courts claim must be supported by showing of actual injury;

discussing actual-injury requirement); see also Burton v. St. Louis Bd. of Police

Comm’rs, 731 F.3d 784, 798 (8th Cir. 2013) (plaintiff alleging conspiracy under

§ 1983 must show that he was deprived of constitutional right or privilege). In

addition, we decline to consider claims that Tiedeman has asserted for the first time

on appeal. See Topchian v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., 760 F.3d 843, 849 (8th Cir.

2014) (appellate court does not address legal or factual claims presented for first time

on appeal). 

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________

The Honorable Karen E. Schreier, United States DistrictJudge for the District 1

of South Dakota.

-2-

Appellate Case: 14-3310 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/23/2015 Entry ID: 4287706