Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-01845/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-01845-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Sacramento County Main Jail
Defendant
Willie Weaver
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

WILLIE WEAVER, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

SACRAMENTO COUNTY MAIN JAIL, 

Defendant. 

No. 2:15-cv-1845-KJM-EFB P 

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 

 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 42 

U.S.C. § 1983. On September 11, 2015, the court found that plaintiff had failed to pay the $400 

filing fee required by 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) or request leave to proceed in forma pauperis and 

submit the affidavit and trust account statement required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). Accordingly, 

the court ordered plaintiff to submit either the filing fee or the application required by § 1915(a) 

within thirty days and warned him that failure to do so may result in this action being dismissed. 

The time for acting has passed and plaintiff has not paid the filing fee, submitted an application 

for leave to proceed in forma pauperis or otherwise responded to the court’s order. 

 Accordingly, it is hereby RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without 

prejudice. 

 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 

Case 2:15-cv-01845-KJM-EFB Document 6 Filed 10/23/15 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2

after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written 

objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned 

“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Any response to the 

objections shall be served and filed within fourteen days after service of the objections. The 

parties are advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to 

appeal the District Court’s order. Turner v. Duncan, 158 F.3d 449, 455 (9th Cir. 1998); Martinez 

v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 

DATED: October 22, 2015. 

Case 2:15-cv-01845-KJM-EFB Document 6 Filed 10/23/15 Page 2 of 2