Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-09-06227/USCOURTS-ca4-09-06227-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
United States of America
Appellee
Ike Rayeford Williams
Appellant

Document Text:

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 09-6227

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff - Appellee, 

 v. 

IKE RAYEFORD WILLIAMS, 

 Defendant - Appellant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle 

District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. N. Carlton 

Tilley, Jr., Senior District Judge. (1:98-cr-00101-NCT-3; 

1:02-cv-00359) 

Submitted: January 25, 2010 Decided: February 3, 2010 

Before KING and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge. 

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

George B. Currin, Raleigh, North Carolina; M. Gordon Widenhouse, 

Jr., RUDOLF, WIDENHOUSE & FIALKO, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 

for Appellant. Anna Mills Wagoner, United States Attorney, 

Angela H. Miller, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, 

North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 

Appeal: 09-6227 Doc: 33 Filed: 02/03/2010 Pg: 1 of 2
2 

PER CURIAM: 

Ike Rayeford Williams appeals the district court’s 

order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and 

denying his “Motion to Re-enter Previous Order of 24 June 2005.” 

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district 

court. United States v. Williams, Nos. 1:98-cr-00101-NCT-3; 

1:02-cv-00359 (M.D.N.C. Jan. 8, 2009). We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before the court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process. 

AFFIRMED

Appeal: 09-6227 Doc: 33 Filed: 02/03/2010 Pg: 2 of 2