Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-01290/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-01290-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Danille Borca
Defendant
William P. Rose
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

WILLIAM P. ROSE,

Plaintiff,

v.

DANILLE BORCA,

Defendant.

No. 2:15-cv-01290 KJN P

ORDER and FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

By order filed July 1, 2015, the undersigned ordered plaintiff to complete and return to the 

court, within thirty days, the USM-285 form necessary to effect service on defendant Danille 

Borca. That thirty day period has since passed, and plaintiff has not responded in any way to the 

court’s order.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall appoint a 

district judge in this action.

IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See

Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations will be submitted to the United States District Judge 

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 

after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections 

with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Findings and 

Case 2:15-cv-01290-KJM-KJN Document 6 Filed 08/21/15 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time

may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th 

Cir. 1991).

Dated: August 20, 2015

/rose1290.fusm

Case 2:15-cv-01290-KJM-KJN Document 6 Filed 08/21/15 Page 2 of 2