Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_11-cv-00938/USCOURTS-cand-3_11-cv-00938-16/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Baystar Capital Management, LLC
Defendant
Lawrence R. Goldfarb
Defendant
Securities And Exchange Commission
Plaintiff

Document Text:

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE

COMMISSION,

Plaintiff,

 v.

LAWRENCE R. GOLDFARB and

BAYSTAR CAPITAL MANAGEMENT,

LLC,

Defendants. /

No. C 11-00938 WHA

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR

APPROVAL OF (1) REDEMPTION

OF ASSETS; (2) FINAL

DISTRIBUTION; (3) PAYMENT OF

ACCRUED FEES TO RECEIVER;

(4) DISCHARGE OF RECEIVER;

AND (5) VACATING HEARING

The Court previously approved two interim distributions to investors totaling $6.2

million (Dkt. Nos. 169 and 179). Now, receiver John W. Cotton moves for approval of (1) the

redemption of remaining assets; (2) a final distribution to investors; (3) payment of his accrued

fees; and (4) his discharge from further duties. 

All of the known assets of the defendants have been identified and liquidated to cash

(Dkt. No. 180-1 at 5). The receiver reports that valuation of the remaining partnership interests

in the Island Fund and Yacht Funds proved difficult since neither fund is publicly traded. The

receiver sought the valuation assistance of the two largest Baystar investors, who collectively

are entitled to 83 percent of the distributable funds in the estate. The two investors approved of

the redemption amounts that the receiver negotiated: $150,000 and $235,638 respectively (Dkt.

No. 180-1 at 2). The receiver seeks the Court’s approval of these redemption amounts, which

Case 3:11-cv-00938-WHA Document 183 Filed 09/06/16 Page 1 of 3
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

are now held in the estate bank account. Counting the redemption amounts, the receiver now

holds $479,540. 

To date, no objection has been received from any creditor. Through his attorney,

defendant Lawrence Goldfarb communicated that he does not oppose the motion (id. at 8). The

Securities and Exchange Commission also does not oppose the present motion, having filed a

statement of non-opposition.

Accordingly, the motion is GRANTED. The receiver is authorized as follows:

1. The offered redemption amounts of $150,000 and $235,648 for the partnership

interests in the Island Fund and Yacht Funds, respectively, is approved;

2. The receiver shall make a final pro rata distribution of all remaining cash to the

Island Fund investors;

3. The receiver shall file final tax returns, and a final accounting of the estate

income and expenses as required by the plaintiff SEC;

4. The receiver shall pay the amount of $18,247.50 to his firm Gartenberg, Gelfand

& Hayton for his legal services and costs incurred;

5. The receiver shall be permitted to hold back $15,000 in funds to cover as yet

unbilled time in preparing and processing the instant motion, and services

anticipated from post receivership work;

6. The receiver is permitted to destroy duplicate, hard copy documents received

from defense counsel, and all other hard copy documents unrelated to the claims

of investors and the operation of the estate;

7. Upon completion of the tasks set forth herein, the receivership is deemed

terminated.

In addition, the Clerk of this Court shall TRANSFER the funds it currently holds on

account of the disgorgement order against defendant Goldfarb, approximately $80,169, to the

receiver for pro rata distribution to defrauded investors.

The receiver also asks for a more expansive release than that provided in the order

appointing him as receiver. The appointment order provides: “In no event shall the Receiver or

Case 3:11-cv-00938-WHA Document 183 Filed 09/06/16 Page 2 of 3
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3

Retained Personnel be liable to anyone for their good faith compliance with their duties and

responsibilities as Receiver or Retained Personnel” (Dkt. No. 53 at 12). This order concludes

that there is no need to expand the scope of the release beyond what is provided in the prior

order.

The hearing set for September 8, 2016, is hereby VACATED. The Court will retain

continuing jurisdiction over this matter.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 6, 2016. WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:11-cv-00938-WHA Document 183 Filed 09/06/16 Page 3 of 3