Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-24-01759/USCOURTS-ca4-24-01759-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
National Science Foundation
Appellee
Carol Scarlett
Appellant

Document Text:

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 24-1759

CAROL SCARLETT,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION, NSF,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at 

Alexandria. Michael Stefan Nachmanoff, District Judge. (1:24-cv-00386-MSN-WEF)

Submitted: December 19, 2024 Decided: December 23, 2024

Before KING and BERNER, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Carol Scarlett, Appellant Pro Se. Dennis Carl Barghaan, Jr., Assistant United States

Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 24-1759 Doc: 11 Filed: 12/23/2024 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Carol Scarlett appeals the district court’s order granting Defendant’s motion to 

dismiss and dismissing for lack of subject matter jurisdiction Scarlett’s civil complaint filed 

under the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 1346(b), 2671-80. We have reviewed the 

record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Scarlett’s motion for oral 

argument and affirm the district court’s order. Scarlett v. Nat’l Science Found. NSF, No. 

1:24-cv-00386-MSN-WEF (E.D. Va. Aug. 6, 2024). We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

AFFIRMED

USCA4 Appeal: 24-1759 Doc: 11 Filed: 12/23/2024 Pg: 2 of 2