Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_10-cv-04372/USCOURTS-cand-3_10-cv-04372-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
George Hein
Defendant
Proteacher
Defendant
Philip Schaechter
Plaintiff
Schaechter Acquisitions, Inc.
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

COMPUTERLAW

GROUP LLP

www.computerlaw.coms m Stipulation and [Proposed] Order re CMC 1 Case No. 10-cv-4372 CRB 

JACK RUSSO (State Bar No. 96068)

CHRISTOPHER SARGENT (State Bar No. 246285)

COMPUTER LAW GROUP LLP

400 Florence Street

Palo Alto, CA 94301

Telephone: (650) 327-9800

Facsimile: (650) 618-1863

Email: jrusso@computerlaw.com

 csargent@computerlaw.com

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

SCHAECHTER ACQUISITIONS, INC.

AND PHILIP SCHAECHTER

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

IN AND FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

SCHAECHTER ACQUISITIONS, INC., a 

Nevada corporation, and PHILIP 

SCHAECHTER, an individual,

Plaintiffs,

v.

GEORGE HEIN, Individually and

Doing Business As “PROTEACHER”, 

and PROTEACHER, 

 Defendants.

Case No. 10-cv-4372 CRB

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT 

CONFERENCE

This Mutual Stipulation is hereby entered into between Plaintiffs Schaechter Acquisitions, 

Inc. and Philip Schaechter and Defendants George Hein and ProTeacher (collectively, the 

“Parties”) by their respective counsel pursuant to Local Rule 7-12 Counsel for Defendants hereby 

appears special, and without waiver of any rights to object to the Complaint, for purposes of this 

Stipulation only.

RECITALS

A. On October 15, 2010, the Parties entered into a written Tolling Agreement in order 

to facilitate ongoing settlement negotiations between them in order to resolve this matter.

Case 3:10-cv-04372-CRB Document 9 Filed 01/06/11 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

COMPUTERLAW

GROUP LLP

www.computerlaw.coms m Stipulation and [Proposed] Order re CMC 2 Case No. 10-cv-4372 CRB 

B. The tolled period of the Tolling Agreement expires on January 13, 2011.

C. The Tolling Agreement states that Defendants George Hein and ProTeacher will 

accept service of process of the Complaint through counsel at the end of the tolled period;

D. Accordingly, the Parties hereby agree as follows:

STIPULATION

1. The Parties respectfully request the court continue the Case Management 

Conference currently set for January 14, 2011 until March 18, 2011 in order to allow them time 

finalize, if possible, their settlement discussions, to serve the Complaint, to respond to the 

Complaint, and to meet and confer on all topics related to the Case Management Conference.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Dated: January 4, 2011 COMPUTERLAW GROUP LLP

 By: /s/ Jack Russo

Jack Russo

Christopher Sargent

Attorney for Plaintiffs

SCHAECHTER ACQUISITIONS, INC. AND

PHILIP SCHAECHTER

Dated: January 4, 2011 TURNER BOYD LLP

 By: /s/ Julie Turner

Julie Turner

Appearing Specially on Behalf of

GEORGE HEIN 

I attest under penalty of perjury that concurrence in the filing of this document has been 

obtained from Julie Turner.

/s/ Jack Russo

Jack Russo

Case 3:10-cv-04372-CRB Document 9 Filed 01/06/11 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

COMPUTERLAW

GROUP LLP

www.computerlaw.coms m Stipulation and [Proposed] Order re CMC 3 Case No. 10-cv-4372 CRB 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED:

Dated: January , 2011

Hon. Charles R. Breyer

06

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Charles R. Breyer

Case 3:10-cv-04372-CRB Document 9 Filed 01/06/11 Page 3 of 3