Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-15-01705/USCOURTS-ca4-15-01705-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
S. N. Brim
Appellee
Eric S. Clark
Appellant
County of Fairfax, Virginia
Appellee
R. L. Davis
Appellee
John Doe #1
Appellee
John Doe #10
Appellee
John Doe #11
Appellee
John Doe #12
Appellee
John Doe #13
Appellee
John Doe #14
Appellee
John Doe #15
Appellee
John Doe #16
Appellee
John Doe #17
Appellee
John Doe #18
Appellee
John Doe #19
Appellee
John Doe #2
Appellee
John Doe #20
Appellee
John Doe #21
Appellee
John Doe #22
Appellee
John Doe #23
Appellee
John Doe #24
Appellee
John Doe #25
Appellee
John Doe #26
Appellee
John Doe #27
Appellee
John Doe #28
Appellee
John Doe #29
Appellee
John Doe #3
Appellee
John Doe #30
Appellee
John Doe #4
Appellee
John Doe #5
Appellee
John Doe #6
Appellee
John Doe #7
Appellee
John Doe #8
Appellee
John Doe #9
Appellee
Randall C. Hargus
Appellee
John H. Kim
Appellee
Richard W. Nagel
Appellee
Kenneth Pfeiffer
Appellee
T. B. Smith
Appellee
John Spata
Appellee
Jonathan Stern
Appellee

Document Text:

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-1705

ERIC S. CLARK,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

THE COUNTY OF FAIRFAX, VIRGINIA; RICHARD W. NAGEL, 

Individually and in capacity as employee of Fairfax County, 

Virginia; R. L. DAVIS, Individually and in capacity as 

employee of Fairfax County, Virginia; JOHN SPATA, 

Individually and in capacity as employee of Fairfax County, 

Virginia; JOHN H. KIM, Individually and in capacity as 

employee of Fairfax County, Virginia; T. B. SMITH, 

Individually and in capacity as employee of Fairfax County, 

Virginia; S. N. BRIM, Individually and in capacity as 

employee of Fairfax County, Virginia; JONATHAN STERN, 

Individually and in capacity as employee of Fairfax County, 

Virginia; KENNETH PFEIFFER, Individually and in capacity as 

employee of Fairfax County, Virginia; RANDALL C. HARGUS, 

Individually and in capacity as employee of Fairfax County, 

Virginia; JOHN DOE #1; JOHN DOE #2; JOHN DOE #3; JOHN DOE 

#4; JOHN DOE #5; JOHN DOE #6; JOHN DOE #7; JOHN DOE #8; 

JOHN DOE #9; JOHN DOE #10; JOHN DOE #11; JOHN DOE #12; JOHN 

DOE #13; JOHN DOE #14; JOHN DOE #15; JOHN DOE #16; JOHN DOE 

#17; JOHN DOE #18; JOHN DOE #19; JOHN DOE #20; JOHN DOE 

#21; JOHN DOE #22; JOHN DOE #23; JOHN DOE #24; JOHN DOE 

#25; JOHN DOE #26; JOHN DOE #27; JOHN DOE #28; JOHN DOE 

#29; JOHN DOE #30,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District 

Judge. (1:13-cv-00616-GBL-JFA)

Appeal: 15-1705 Doc: 16 Filed: 12/03/2015 Pg: 1 of 3
2

Submitted: November 4, 2015 Decided: December 3, 2015

Before KEENAN, DIAZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Eric S. Clark, Appellant Pro Se. Jamie Marie Greenzweig, FAIRFAX 

COUNTY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, Fairfax, Virginia; John David Gilbody, 

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, 

for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 15-1705 Doc: 16 Filed: 12/03/2015 Pg: 2 of 3
3

PER CURIAM:

Eric S. Clark appeals the district court’s order denying 

his motion for leave to amend the complaint, following the 

district court’s dismissal of Clark’s first complaint under Fed. 

R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) and this Court’s affirmance of that order. 

See Clark v. Cnty. of Fairfax, 554 F. App’x 171 (4th Cir. 2014) 

(No. 13-2101). We have reviewed the record and find no 

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s 

order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

AFFIRMED

Appeal: 15-1705 Doc: 16 Filed: 12/03/2015 Pg: 3 of 3