Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-02260/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-02260-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
California State University
Defendant
Mihretu Bulti Dasisa
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MIHRETU BULTI DASISA,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-05-2260 GEB KJM PS

vs.

CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY,

Defendant. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

By order filed May 1, 2006, plaintiff was granted thirty days in which to file an

amended complaint that complied with the court’s December 12, 2005 order. The thirty day

period has now expired, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded

to the court's order.

IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without

prejudice. See Local Rule 11-110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within ten days

after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections

with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings

and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified

Case 2:05-cv-02260-GEB -KJM Document 12 Filed 06/20/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153

(9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: June 19, 2006.

______________________________________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Dasisa2260.fta

Case 2:05-cv-02260-GEB -KJM Document 12 Filed 06/20/06 Page 2 of 2