Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_10-cv-00720/USCOURTS-cand-3_10-cv-00720-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Implicit Networks, Inc.
Plaintiff
Red Hat, Inc.
Defendant
VMware, Inc.
Defendant

Document Text:

STIPULATED JT. MOT. & [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME

FOR VMWARE TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT

Case No. C 10-00720 SI

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Katherine Kelly Lutton (CA Bar No. 194971)

lutton@fr.com

Tamara Fraizer (CA Bar No. 215942)

fraizer@fr.com

Robert J. Kent (CA Bar No. 250905)

rjkent@fr.com

FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.

500 Arguello Street, Suite 500

Redwood City, California 94063-1526

Telephone: (650) 839-5070

Facsimile: (650) 839-5071

Attorneys for Defendants

VMWARE, INC. and RED HAT, INC.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

(SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION)

IMPLICIT NETWORKS, INC.,

Plaintiff,

v.

VMWARE, INC. and RED HAT, INC.,

Defendants.

Case No. C 10-00720 SI

STIPULATED JOINT MOTION AND

[PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME

FOR DEFENDANT VMWARE, INC. TO

RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S

COMPLAINT

TO THE COURT AND ALL PARTIES OF RECORD:

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Plaintiff Implicit Networks, Inc. (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant

VMware, Inc. (“VMware”) file this Stipulated Joint Motion and Proposed Order to Extend Time for

Defendant VMware, Inc. to Respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint.

The parties have a mutual interest in the orderly and efficient conduct of this litigation, and

they agree that this extension of time will assist the parties in formulating their pleadings and

responses in the present action. Having thus met and conferred on the issue, the parties hereby

stipulate that VMware’s deadline to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff’s complaint should be

Case 3:10-cv-00720-SI Document 29 Filed 05/13/10 Page 1 of 4
2 STIPULATED JT. MOT. & [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME

FOR VMWARE TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT

Case No. C 10-00720 SI

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

extended 30 days until June 14, 2010, and also move the court to order that this deadline be

extended to June 14, 2010.

Dated: May 11, 2010 FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.

By: /s/ Katherine Kelly Lutton

Katherine Kelly Lutton

Attorney for Defendants

VMWARE, INC. and RED HAT, INC.

Dated: May 11, 2010 HOSIE RICE LLP

By: /s/ Katherine Kelly Lutton

On behalf of Spencer Hosie

Spencer Hosie

Attorney for Plaintiff

IMPLICIT NETWORKS, INC.

DECLARATION

Pursuant to General Order No. 45, Section X(B) regarding signatures, I attest under penalty

of perjury that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from Spencer Hosie.

Dated: May 11, 2010 FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.

By: /s/ Katherine Kelly Lutton

Katherine Kelly Lutton

Attorney for Defendants

VMWARE, INC. and RED HAT, INC.

50713345.doc

Case 3:10-cv-00720-SI Document 29 Filed 05/13/10 Page 2 of 4
3 STIPULATED JT. MOT. & [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME

FOR VMWARE TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT

Case No. C 10-00720 SI

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Pursuant to stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED that Defendant VMware’s answer or other

response to Implicit Network’s complaint shall be due on June 14, 2010.

Dated: ________________, 2010.

Honorable Susan Illston

United States District Court Judge

50713345.doc

Case 3:10-cv-00720-SI Document 29 Filed 05/13/10 Page 3 of 4
4 STIPULATED JT. MOT. & [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME

FOR VMWARE TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT

Case No. C 10-00720 SI

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned hereby certifies that on May 11, 2010, all counsel of record who are

deemed to have consented to electronic service are being served with a copy of STIPULATED

JOINT MOTION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT

VMWARE, INC. TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT via the Court’s CM/ECF

system per Local Rule 5-4 and General Order 45. Any other counsel of record will be served by

first class mail.

/s/ Katherine Kelly Lutton

Katherine Kelly Lutton

50713345.doc

Case 3:10-cv-00720-SI Document 29 Filed 05/13/10 Page 4 of 4