Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-00686/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-00686-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Ryan Marino
Petitioner
James Walker
Respondent

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RYAN MARINO,

Petitioner, No. CIV S-07-0686 GEB GGH P

vs.

JAMES WALKER,

Respondent. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

By order filed May 10, 2007, petitioner was directed to file a petition that

complies with the requirements of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases, the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure, and the Local Rules of Practice within thirty days. The thirty day period has

now expired, and petitioner has not filed a petition or otherwise responded to the court’s order.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed. 

See Local Rule 11-110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty

days after being served with these findings and recommendations, petitioner may file written

objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s

Findings and Recommendations.” Petitioner is advised that failure to file objections within the

Case 2:07-cv-00686-GEB-GGH Document 4 Filed 08/14/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951

F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: 8/14/07

/s/ Gregory G. Hollows

 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

GGH:035

mari0686.ffp

Case 2:07-cv-00686-GEB-GGH Document 4 Filed 08/14/07 Page 2 of 2