Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-01154/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-01154-4/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Joe Lizzaraga
Respondent
Richard C. Rodriguez
Petitioner

Document Text:

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

RICHARD C. RODRIGUEZ, 

Petitioner, 

v. 

JOE LIZZARAGA, 

Respondent. 

No. 2:15-cv-1154 JAM DB 

ORDER 

 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus 

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge 

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 

 On October 4, 2016, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 

which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to 

the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Neither party has filed 

objections to the findings and recommendations. 

 The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 

supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 

ORDERED that: 

 1. The findings and recommendations filed October 4, 2016, are adopted in full; and 

 2. Respondent’s motion to dismiss (ECF No. 17) based on petitioner’s failure to state a 

cognizable claim is granted as to claim 1 and denied as to claim 6. 

DATED: January 18, 2017 

 /s/John A. Mendez_________________________ 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 

Case 2:15-cv-01154-JKS Document 33 Filed 01/18/17 Page 1 of 1