Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_16-cv-00962/USCOURTS-cand-4_16-cv-00962-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
KHN Solutions Inc.
Counter-defendant
Vertisense Inc.
Counter-claimant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KHN SOLUTIONS INC.,

Plaintiff,

v.

VERTISENSE INC.,

Defendant.

Case No. 16-cv-00962-HSG 

ORDER REGARDING APRIL 28, 2016 

ORAL ARGUMENT

Re: Dkt. No. 30

On April 25, 2016, the parties filed a joint letter informing the Court that the parties have 

agreed to have associates argue the pending motion to dismiss. Dkt. No. 30. 

The Court appreciates the parties’ proactive effort to provide opportunities for newer 

lawyers, and is happy to accommodate the request. The parties should keep in mind that the Court 

has carefully read and considered the parties’ briefs on the pending motion to dismiss. For this 

reason, as in all matters, the Court does not expect a presentation (via a slide deck or otherwise) 

that simply repeats the arguments in the briefs. Instead, counsel should focus the argument on 

clarifying and augmenting key points. The Court looks forward to Thursday’s hearing.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 27, 2016

______________________________________

HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR.

United States District Judge

Case 4:16-cv-00962-HSG Document 33 Filed 04/27/16 Page 1 of 1