Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_09-cv-04615/USCOURTS-cand-3_09-cv-04615-5/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Jan Bishop
Defendant
Wai Hung Lo
Plaintiff
United States of America
Plaintiff

Document Text:

NO. C 09-04615 RS 

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United 

States District 

Court

For the Northern District of California 

*E-Filed 03/25/2010* 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, and WAI 

HUNG LO, Revenue Agent, 

 Petitioners, 

 v. 

JAN BISHOP, 

 Respondent. 

____________________________________/

No. C 09-04615 RS 

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE 

 Petitioners now seek enforcement of a summons allegedly served upon respondent in June of 

2009, adoption of Magistrate Judge James’ January 19, 2010 Report and Recommendation imposing 

a compliance deadline of April 30, 2010, and dismissal of the case without prejudice. Prior to 

reassignment to Judge Seeborg, Judge Hamilton scheduled an order to show cause hearing on April 

7, 2010 with a response deadline of March 17, 2010. The April 7 deadline was vacated by a March 

18, 2010 reassignment order. 

 On or before April 15, 2010, respondent shall file and serve a written response, supported by 

appropriate affidavits or declarations, to show cause, if any, why she should not be compelled to 

comply with the summons served upon her on June 18, 2009. If a response is not filed by that date, 

the parties are ordered to appear on May 6, 2010 at 1:30 p.m. in Courtroom 3 on the 17th Floor of 

Case 3:09-cv-04615-RS Document 18 Filed 03/25/10 Page 1 of 2
NO. C 09-04615 RS 

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

2 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United 

States District 

Court

For the Northern District of California 

the United States Courthouse, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco, California and show cause 

why the relief prayed for by petitioners should not be granted. 

 Petitioners are directed to serve a copy of this ORDER promptly on respondent in 

accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 5. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: 03/25/2010 

RICHARD SEEBORG 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 3:09-cv-04615-RS Document 18 Filed 03/25/10 Page 2 of 2