Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-16-06798/USCOURTS-ca4-16-06798-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Wilson Hill
Appellant
United States of America
Appellee

Document Text:

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-6798

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

WILSON HILL,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Newport News. Arenda L. Wright Allen, 

District Judge. (4:14-cr-00003-AWA-LRL-1; 4:15-cv-00015-AWA)

Submitted: September 13, 2016 Decided: September 15, 2016

Before TRAXLER, AGEE, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Wilson Hill, Appellant Pro Se. Eric Matthew Hurt, Assistant United 

States Attorney, Newport News, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 16-6798 Doc: 7 Filed: 09/15/2016 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Wilson Hill seeks to appeal the district court’s order 

granting in part and denying in part his motion filed pursuant to 

28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012). United States v. Hill, No. 4:14-cr00003-AWA-LRL-1 (E.D. Va. filed May 19, 2016 & entered May 23, 

2016). This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final 

orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and 

collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); 

Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). 

The order Hill seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an 

appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we 

dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with 

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Appeal: 16-6798 Doc: 7 Filed: 09/15/2016 Pg: 2 of 2