Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_12-cv-05961/USCOURTS-cand-3_12-cv-05961-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Michael J. Astrue
Defendant
Karen Phillips
Plaintiff

Document Text:

Case No. 12-cv-05961 NC 

ORDER 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

United States District Court 

Northern District of Californi

a

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

KAREN PHILLIPS, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, 

Defendant. 

Case No. 12-cv-05961-NC 

ORDER TO FILE REPLY 

Re: Dkt. No. 22 

Plaintiff must by March 23, 2015, file a reply in support of the motion for attorney fees, 

Dkt. No. 22. The reply should address the defendant’s analysis of the effective hourly rate and 

whether and how much of a EAJA fee set off the Court should order. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: March 16, 2015 

 ___________________________ 

 NATHANAEL COUSINS 

 United States Magistrate Judge 

Case 3:12-cv-05961-NC Document 24 Filed 03/16/15 Page 1 of 1