Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-02256/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-02256-4/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Norman Hubbs
Plaintiff
Steven Mayberg
Defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

NORMAN HUBBS,

Plaintiff, 2:04-cv-2256-GEB-DAD-P

vs.

STEVEN MAYBERG,

Defendant. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff, a civil detainee proceeding pro se, has

filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C.

§ 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate

Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General

Order No. 262.

On July 8, 2005, the magistrate judge filed findings

and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and

which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the

findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. 

Defendant filed timely objections to the findings and

Case 2:04-cv-02256-GEB-DAD Document 36 Filed 09/15/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

recommendations. The copy of the findings and recommendations

served on plaintiff at his address of record was returned to the

court as undeliverable on July 21, 2005. After plaintiff filed a

notice of change of address, plaintiff was re-served with the

findings and recommendations and was granted an extension of time

to file a reply to defendant’s objections. Plaintiff has filed a

reply as well as objections of his own.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C.

§ 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 72-304, this court has conducted a

de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the

entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to

be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed July 8, 2005

are adopted in full; 

2. Defendant’s December 22, 2004 motion to dismiss is

denied; and

3. Defendant is directed to file his answer within the

time provided by Rule 12(a)(4)(A) of the Federal Rules of Civil

Procedure.

Dated: September 14, 2005

/s/ Garland E. Burrell, Jr.

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.

United States District Judge

Case 2:04-cv-02256-GEB-DAD Document 36 Filed 09/15/05 Page 2 of 2