Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_16-cv-04074/USCOURTS-cand-4_16-cv-04074-3/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Ally Financial Inc.
Cross-defendant
Weerachai Chaiwong
Plaintiff
Hanlees Fremont Hyundai
Defendant
Hanlees Fremont, Inc.
Cross-claimant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

07462.0532/9791738.1 3:16-cv-04074-HSG

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME 

JOHN B. SULLIVAN (State Bar No. 96742)

jbs@severson.com

ERIK KEMP (State Bar No. 246196)

ek@severson.com

MARY KATE KAMKA (State Bar No. 282911)

mkk@severson.com

SEVERSON & WERSON

A Professional Corporation

One Embarcadero Center, Suite 2600

San Francisco, California 94111

Telephone: (415) 398-3344

Facsimile: (415) 956-0439

Attorneys for Defendant

ALLY FINANCIAL INC.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

WEERACHAI CHAIWONG, an individual,

Plaintiff,

vs.

HANLEES FREMONT, INC., a California 

Corporation, dba HANLEES FREMONT 

HYUNDAI; ALLY FINANCIAL, INC., a 

Delaware Corporation; and DOES 1 through 

75, inclusive,

Defendants.

Case No. 3:16-cv-04074-HSG

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO 

EXTEND TIME FOR ALLY FINANCIAL 

INC. TO FILE ITS REPLY IN SUPPORT 

OF ITS MOTION TO DISMISS THE 

CROSS CLAIMS OF DEFENDANT 

HANLEES FREMONT, INC., PURSUANT 

TO LOCAL RULE 6-1(b)

Action Filed: May 25, 2016 

Alameda Superior

Removed to USDC, ND of California:

July 20, 2016

Pursuant to Local Rule 6-1(b), Defendant Hanlees Fremont, Inc. (“Hanlees”) and 

Defendant Ally Financial Inc. (“Ally”) (together, the “Parties’) by and through their respective 

counsel of record, hereby stipulate as follows:

STIPULATION 

WHEREAS, Hanlees filed cross claims against Ally in connection with its answer to 

Plaintiff Weerachai Chaiwong’s complaint on September 26, 2016 (see Dkt. No. 25);

WHEREAS, the parties previously stipulated to an extension of Ally’s deadline to file its 

response to Hanlees’ cross claims on October 13, 2016 (See Dkt. no. 32); 

WHEREAS, Ally filed a motion to dismiss Hanlees’ cross claims on November 7, 2016

Case 4:16-cv-04074-HSG Document 49 Filed 12/29/16 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

07462.0532/9791738.1 2 3:16-cv-04074-HSG

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME 

that is set to be heard on January 26, 2017; 

WHEREAS, the parties previously stipulated to two extensions for Hanlees to file its 

opposition to Ally’s motion to dismiss and to two extensions for Ally to file its reply thereto;

WHEREAS, the first stipulated request for an extension of both deadlines was made on

November 21, 2016. (See Dkt. No. 37.) The request was refiled on December 2, 2016 after notice 

from the court of an electronic filing error. (See Dkt. No. 38.) The Court retroactively granted 

this request on December 7, 2016, and set Hanlees’ opposition deadline as December 5, 2016 and 

Ally’s reply deadline as December 19, 2016. (See Dkt. No. 41.);

WHEREAS, the second stipulated request for an extension of both deadlines was made on 

December 5, 2016. (See Dkt. No. 39.) The Court granted this request on December 7, 2016, and 

set Hanlees’ opposition deadline as December 19, 2016 and Ally’s reply deadline as January 7, 

2017. (See Dkt. No. 42.);

WHEREAS, Hanlees filed its opposition to Ally’s motion to dismiss on December 19, 

2016 (See Dkt. No. 46);

WHEREAS, Ally’s reply brief in support of its motion to dismiss Hanlees’ cross claims is 

currently due on January 7, 2017;

WHEREAS, Hanlees has agreed to an extension of Ally’s time to file its reply brief by ten

(10) days or until January 17, 2017 to accommodate Ally’s counsel’s trial and holiday vacation 

schedule (see Kamka Decl. in support of stipulation, ¶¶ 1-2);

WHEREAS, this extension will not have any effect on the current schedule for the case.

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED TO, by and between the Parties herein, through their 

respective attorneys of record, that Ally will have a ten (10) day extension, up to and including 

January 17, 2017 , in which to file and serve its reply in support of its motion to dismiss Hanlees’

cross claims. 

This Stipulation is made without prejudice to, or waiver of, any rights or defenses 

otherwise available to the Parties in this action. 

Case 4:16-cv-04074-HSG Document 49 Filed 12/29/16 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

07462.0532/9791738.1 3 3:16-cv-04074-HSG

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME 

DATED: December 28, 2016 SEVERSON & WERSON

A Professional Corporation

By: /s/ Mary Kate Kamka

Mary Kate Kamka

Attorneys for Defendant

ALLY FINANCIAL INC.

DATED: December 28, 2016 LAW OFFICES OF MARTIN PUTNAM 

By: /s/ Martin Putnam

Martin Putnam

Attorney for Defendant and Cross-Claimant

HANLEES FREMONT, INC. 

I, Mary Kate Kamka, am the ECF user whose identification and password are being used 

to file this Stipulation and [Proposed] Order to Extend Time. I hereby attest that Martin Putnam 

has concurred in this filing.

/s/ Mary Kate Kamka

PURSUANT TO THE STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: December 29, 2016 _________________________________

The Honorable Haywood S. Gilliam Jr.

 

Case 4:16-cv-04074-HSG Document 49 Filed 12/29/16 Page 3 of 3