Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_12-cv-03035/USCOURTS-caed-2_12-cv-03035-7/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Gina McKeen-Chaplin
Plaintiff
Provident Savings Bank, F.S.B.
Defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GINA MCKEEN-CHAPLIN, 

individually, on behalf of 

other similarly situated, and 

on behalf of the general 

public,

Plaintiff,

v.

PROVIDENT SAVINGS BANK, FSB,

Defendant.

No. 2:12-CV-03035-GEB-AC 

ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK OF 

COURT TO SUBSTITUTE A REDACTED 

EXHIBIT IN PLACE OF AN 

UNREDACTED EXHIBIT

On March 13, 2015 Provident filed a request that 

electronic access be blocked to its filing that contains more 

than just the last four digits of tax identification numbers. 

Provident states this information was inadvertently “attached to 

Exhibit 1 to Provident’s Request for Judicial Notice In Support 

of Opposition to Plaintiffs’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment 

(ECF No. 77-2).” (ECF No. 82.) A proposed redacted copy of 

Exhibit 1 to Provident’s Request for Judicial Notice is attached 

to Provident’s request and filed as ECF No. 82-2.

Since Provident should have complied with Federal Rule 

Case 2:12-cv-03035-MCE-AC Document 84 Filed 03/17/15 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

of Civil Procedure 5.2(a), its request is GRANTED. The Clerk of

the Court shall substitute the redacted Exhibit 1 filed as ECF 

No. 82-2 in place of Exhibit 1 that is attached to the Request 

for Judicial Notice filed on March 2, 2015, which is filed as ECF 

No. 77-2. 

Dated: March 16, 2015

Case 2:12-cv-03035-MCE-AC Document 84 Filed 03/17/15 Page 2 of 2