Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cr-00267/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cr-00267-5/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Joe Milam Cathey
Defendant
USA
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIP & [PROP.] ORDER

CR 06-327 SI

KEVIN V. RYAN (CSBN 118321)

United States Attorney

MARK L. KROTOSKI (CSBN 138549)

Chief, Criminal Division

TRACIE L. BROWN (CSBN 184339)

Assistant United States Attorney

450 Golden Gate Avenue, Box 36055

San Francisco, CA 94102

Telephone: (415) 436-6917

Facsimile: (415) 436-7234

Attorneys for Plaintiff

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

JOE MILAM CATHEY,

Defendant.

 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CR 06-267 SI

[PROPOSED] ORDER AND STIPULATION

(1) EXCLUDING TIME FR OM

SEPTEMBER 22, 2006 TO NOVEMBER 17,

2006 FROM THE SPEEDY TRIAL ACT

CALCULATION 

(18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(A))

The parties appeared before the Honorable Susan Illston on September 22, 2006 and

October 20, 2006. 

With the agreement of counsel for both parties, the Court found and held as follows:

1. The parties agreed to an exclusion of time under the Speedy Trial Act from September

22, 2006 to November 17, 2006, in light of the need for the advisory counsel to review the case

and meet with the Defendant, and for the parties to discuss an appropriate resolution of the case. 

In addition, the Defendant’s counsel will be out of town and unavailable for several Fridays

between October 22 and November 17. Thus, failure to grant the requested continuance would

unreasonably deny defense counsel reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, and

Case 3:06-cr-00267-SI Document 28 Filed 10/25/2006 Page 1 of 2
 Case 3:06-cr-00267-SI Document 29 Filed 10/25/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIP & [PROP.] ORDER

CR 06-327 SI 2

would deny the defendant continuity of counsel. 

2. Given these circumstances, the Court found that the ends of justice served by

excluding the period from September 22, 2006 to November 17, 2006 outweigh the best interest

of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. Id. § 3161(h)(8)(A). 

3. Accordingly, and with the consent of the defendant, the Court ordered that the period

from September 22, 2006 to November 17, 2006 be excluded from Speedy Trial Act calculations

under 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(A) & (B)(iv). 

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

DATED: 10/24/06 /S/ 

TRACIE L. BROWN

Assistant United States Attorney

DATED: 10/24/06 /S/ 

 STEVEN KALAR

Attorney for Joe Milam Cathey

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED:_____________________ ________________________________

THE HON. SUSAN ILLSTON

United States District Judge

Case 3:06-cr-00267-SI Document 28 Filed 10/25/2006 Page 2 of 2
 Case 3:06-cr-00267-SI Document 29 Filed 10/25/06 Page 2 of 2