Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-01808/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-01808-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Mika Christina Alfaro
Plaintiff
Bank of America
Defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

 Without reference to these matters, plaintiff filed, on September 20, 2006, a request to

1

transfer this matter to bankruptcy court, which this court denied on September 27, 2006. 

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MIKA CHRISTINA ALFARO,

Plaintiff, No. CIV.S. 06-1808 DFL GGH PS

vs.

BANK OF AMERICA, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Defendant.

______________________________/

By order filed September 12, 2006, plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma

pauperis was denied and her complaint dismissed, with leave to file, within thirty days, an

amended application to proceed in forma pauperis and an amended complaint. The thirty day

period has now expired, and plaintiff has filed neither an amended application nor an amended

complaint, nor otherwise responded to the court’s order.1

Plaintiff has apparently decided to rest on the dismissed complaint. 

Accordingly, for the reasons set forth in the order filed September 12, 2006, IT IS

HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed with prejudice. See E. D. Cal. L. R.

11-110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

Case 2:06-cv-01808-DFL-GGH Document 6 Filed 11/03/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the Honorable David F.

Levi, the United States District Judge assigned to this case, pursuant to the provisions of 28

U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within ten days after being served with these findings and recommendations,

plaintiff may file written objections with the court. The document should be captioned

“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that

failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District

Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

So ordered.

DATED: 11/2/06 /s/ Gregory G. Hollows

 

GREGORY G. HOLLOWS

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

NOW6:Alfaro1808.f&r

Case 2:06-cv-01808-DFL-GGH Document 6 Filed 11/03/06 Page 2 of 2