Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-03275/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-03275-5/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
City and County of San Francisco
Defendant
Louise Wiltz
Plaintiff

Document Text:

-1- 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STEVEN R. JACOBSEN

BAR NO. 95246 

JAMES L. ARMSTRONG

BAR NO. 87797 

LAW OFFICES OF STEVEN R. JACOBSEN

901 CLAY STREET

OAKLAND, CALIFORNIA 94607 

(510) 465-1500 

ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF

LOUISE WILTZ

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

LOUISE WILTZ, 

 Plaintiff, 

 vs. 

CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN 

FRANCISCO, 

 Defendants.

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Case No.: C 05-03275 CRB 

PLAINTIFF’S OPPOSITION TO 

DISMISSAL 

On June 7, 2006 the parties agreed to settle the case. On that same day, the court issued an 

order that the case would be automatically dismissed within 30 days (by July 7) unless plaintiff filed 

an opposition to dismissal, indicating that the settlement funds had not yet been paid. 

As of 11:20 a.m. on Monday, July 03, 2006, plaintiff’s counsel has not yet received the 

settlement funds, and respectfully requests that the court extend the “automatic” dismissal period 

through Tuesday, August 8, 2006. 

Dated: July 3, 2006 LAW OFFICES OF STEVEN R. JACOBSEN 

 //ss// JAMES L. ARMSTRONG Attorneys for Plaintiffs

Plaintiff’s Opposition to Dismissal 

Wiltz v. CCSF #C-05-03275-CRB 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Charles R. Breyer

July 5, 2006

Case 3:05-cv-03275-CRB Document 26 Filed 07/07/06 Page 1 of 1