Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_23-cv-01412/USCOURTS-caed-2_23-cv-01412-2/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Jake Peccia
Plaintiff
State of California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
Defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JAKE PECCIA,

Plaintiff,

v.

STATE OF CALIFORNIA 

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS 

AND REHABILITATION,

Defendant.

No. 2:23-cv-01412-DAD-AC (PS)

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND 

RECOMMENDATIONS AND DISMISSING 

THIS ACTION

(Doc. Nos. 8, 12)

Plaintiff Jake Peccia is proceeding pro se in this civil action. This matter was referred to a 

United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On November 6, 2023, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and 

recommendations recommending that this action be dismissed, without prejudice, due to 

plaintiff’s failure to comply with a court order and failure to prosecute. (Doc. No. 12.) Those 

findings and recommendations were served on the parties and contained notice that any 

objections thereto were to be filed within twenty-one (21) days from the date of service. (Id. at 

1–2.) To date, no objections have been filed, and the time in which to do so has now passed.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), this court has conducted a 

de novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the findings 

and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Case 2:23-cv-01412-DAD-AC Document 13 Filed 01/17/24 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Accordingly, 

1. The findings and recommendations issued on November 6, 2023 (Doc. No. 12) are 

adopted in full;

2. This action is dismissed, without prejudice, due to plaintiff’s failure to comply 

with a court order and failure to prosecute; 

3. The pending motion to dismiss (Doc. No. 8) is denied as having been rendered 

moot by this order; and

4. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 17, 2024 

DALE A. DROZD

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:23-cv-01412-DAD-AC Document 13 Filed 01/17/24 Page 2 of 2