Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca5-23-50886/USCOURTS-ca5-23-50886-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Christopher Lee Hallmark
Appellant
United States of America
Appellee

Document Text:

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Fifth Circuit ____________ 

No. 23-50886 

Summary Calendar 

____________ 

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee, 

versus

Christopher Lee Hallmark, 

Defendant—Appellant. 

______________________________ 

Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the Western District of Texas 

USDC No. 6:23-CR-113-1 

______________________________ 

Before Wiener, Ho, and Ramirez, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

The attorney appointed to represent Christopher Lee Hallmark has 

moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders 

v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 

(5th Cir. 2011). Hallmark has not filed a response. We have reviewed 

counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We 

_____________________ 

*

 This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5. 

United States Court of Appeals 

Fifth Circuit 

FILED 

December 11, 2024 

Lyle W. Cayce 

Clerk 

Case: 23-50886 Document: 65-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/11/2024
No. 23-50886 

2 

concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous 

issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to 

withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities 

herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2. 

Case: 23-50886 Document: 65-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/11/2024