Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_19-cv-01684/USCOURTS-caed-2_19-cv-01684-3/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Aria
Defendant
Wilson Lopez
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

WILSON LOPEZ,

Plaintiff,

v.

ARIA,

Defendant.

No. 2:19-cv-01684-DMC 

ORDER

Wilson Lopez (“Plaintiff”), a state prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights 

action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge 

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 

On October 30, 2019, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations herein 

which were served on Plaintiff and which contained notice that Plaintiff may file objections 

within the time specified therein. (ECF No. 7.) Plaintiff has not filed objections to the Findings 

and Recommendations.

Accordingly, the Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. 

United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are 

reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 

1983); see also 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). 

///

Case 2:19-cv-01684-TLN-DMC Document 8 Filed 02/28/20 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Having reviewed the file under the applicable legal standards, the Court finds the Findings 

and Recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed on October 30, 2019 (ECF No. 7), are 

adopted in full; and

2. Plaintiff’s action is DISMISSED without prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED

Dated: February 27, 2020

Case 2:19-cv-01684-TLN-DMC Document 8 Filed 02/28/20 Page 2 of 2