Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca5-02-21342/USCOURTS-ca5-02-21342-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Kenneth Wayne Shepherd
Appellant
United States of America
Appellee

Document Text:

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

February 18, 2004

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 02-21342

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

KENNETH WAYNE SHEPHERD,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. H-02-CR-184-ALL 

--------------------

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, EMILIO M. GARZA, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Kenneth Shepherd appeals from a bench-trial conviction

for being a felon in possession of a firearm in violation of

18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(1) and 942(a). Shepherd argues that

18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) is an overly broad assertion of Commerce

Clause power that unconstitutionally burdens the Second Amendment

right to bear arms. Shepherd further argues that 18 U.S.C.

§ 922(g)(1) violates the Equal Protection Clause. 

 Case: 02-21342 Document: 0051512220 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/18/2004
No. 02-21342

-2-

Shepherd’s arguments are foreclosed by this court’s holding

in United States v. Darrington, 351 F.3d 632 (5th Cir. 2003).

Shepherd also challenges his 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1)

conviction as a violation of the Commerce Clause and the Tenth

Amendment. He argues that the Government did not produce

evidence that the firearm was in or substantially affected

interstate commerce. Shepherd concedes that these arguments are

foreclosed by this court’s holding in United States v. Daugherty,

264 F.3d 513, 518 & n.12 (5th Cir. 2001), but he seeks to

preserve the issue for Supreme Court review. The judgment of the

district court is AFFIRMED.

 Case: 02-21342 Document: 0051512220 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/18/2004