Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-arwd-5_04-cv-05297/USCOURTS-arwd-5_04-cv-05297-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Scott Farbor
Defendant
Mike Freeman
Defendant
Daniel Overton Robbins
Plaintiff
Jacob Waggner
Defendant

Document Text:

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS

FAYETTEVILLE DIVISION

DANIEL OVERTON ROBBINS PLAINTIFF

v. Civil No. 04-5297

 

SCOTT FARBOR; JACOB WAGGNER;

and MIKE FREEMAN, all of the Washington

County Sheriff’s Office/Detention Center DEFENDANTS

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Daniel Overton Robbins filed this pro se civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on

December 6, 2004. His complaint was filed in forma pauperis (IFP). 

On June 6, 2005, defendants filed a motion for summary judgment (Doc. 13). On July 1,

2005, the undersigned entered an order (Doc. 16) directing Robbins to complete, sign and return

an attached questionnaire that would serve as his response to the summary judgment motion.

The plaintiff’s response to the questionnaire was to be returned byAugust 5, 2005. To date,

the plaintiff has failed to respond to the questionnaire. The court’s order and attached questionnaire

have not been returned as undeliverable. The order was mailed to the same address as the court’s

prior orders. Plaintiff has not informed the court of any change in his address. Plaintiff has not

otherwise communicated with the court.

I therefore recommend Robbin’s claims be dismissed on the grounds he has failed to

prosecute this action and comply with the order of the court. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). The

parties have ten days from receipt of the report and recommendation in which to file written

objections pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). The failure to file timely objections may result

Case 5:04-cv-05297-JLH Document 17 Filed 08/25/05 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: <pageID>
-2-

in waiver of the right to appeal questions of fact. The parties are reminded that objections

must be both timely and specific to trigger de novo review by the district court.

DATED this 25th day of August 2005.

 /s/ Beverly Stites Jones 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 5:04-cv-05297-JLH Document 17 Filed 08/25/05 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: <pageID>