Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-01877/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-01877-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
The Lumber Industry Pension Fund
Defendant
Enrique Vargas
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ENRIQUE VARGAS,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-06-1877 DFL KJM PS

vs.

THE LUMBER INDUSTRY PENSION FUND,

Defendant. ORDER

 /

This action was referred to the undersigned pursuant to Local Rule 72-302(c)(21). 

Calendared for hearing on September 27, 2006 is defendant’s motion to dismiss. No opposition

to the motion has been filed. 

Local Rule 78-230(c) provides that opposition to the granting of a motion must be

filed fourteen days preceding the noticed hearing date. The Rule further provides that “[n]o party

will be entitled to be heard in opposition to a motion at oral arguments if written opposition to

the motion has not been timely filed by that party.” In addition, Local Rule 78-230(j) provides

that failure to appear may be deemed withdrawal of opposition to the motion or may result in

sanctions. Finally, Local Rule 11-110 provides that failure to comply with the Local Rules “may

be grounds for imposition of any and all sanctions authorized by statute or Rule or within the

inherent power of the Court.”

Case 2:06-cv-01877-DFL -KJM Document 11 Filed 09/19/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The hearing date of September 27, 2006 is vacated. Hearing on defendant’s

motion is continued to October 25, 2006 at 10:00 a.m. in courtroom no. 26.

2. Plaintiff shall file opposition, if any, to the motion no later than October 11,

2006. Failure to file opposition and appear at the hearing will be deemed as a statement of nonopposition and shall result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed pursuant to Federal

Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).

DATED: September 18, 2006.

______________________________________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

006

vargas.con

Case 2:06-cv-01877-DFL -KJM Document 11 Filed 09/19/06 Page 2 of 2