Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-03462/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-03462-2/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Paetec Communications, Inc.
Counter-claimant
Telscape Communications, Inc.
Counter-defendant

Document Text:

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TELSCAPE COMMUNICATIONS, INC.,

Plaintiff,

 v.

 PAETEC COMMUNICATIONS, INC., et al.

Defendants. /

No. C 05-03462 JSW

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY

CASE SHOULD NOT BE

DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO

PROSECUTE

On September 13, 2006, Plaintiff filed a notice of voluntary dismissal with prejudice as

to its claims against Paetec Communications, Inc. (Docket No. 16.) In that dismissal, Plaintiff

noted that it did not intend to dismiss claims against Defendants named as Does 1-10. 

However, Plaintiff has taken no further action to prosecute the claims against such Doe

defendants.

Accordingly, Plaintiff is HEREBY ORDERED to show cause by no later than March

23, 2007, as to why this matter should not be dismissed without prejudice for failure to

prosecute. This OSC will be discharged if Plaintiff files a notice of dismissal as to the

remaining defendants before that date.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 9, 2007 

JEFFREY S. WHITE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:05-cv-03462-JSW Document 17 Filed 03/09/07 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Case 3:05-cv-03462-JSW Document 17 Filed 03/09/07 Page 2 of 2