Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-06660/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-06660-2/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
California Restaurant Association
Plaintiff
City of Emeryville
Defendant
Unite Here Local 2850
Intervenor Dft

Document Text:

{2192470.DOC;} 1 Stipulation to Change Hearing Date; Proposed Order 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

weintraub tobin chediak coleman grodin law corporation

Charles L. Post, State Bar No. 160443 

Lukas J. Clary, State Bar No. 251519 

weintraub tobin chediak coleman grodin 

LAW CORPORATION 

400 Capitol Mall, 11th Floor 

Sacramento, California 95814 

Telephone: 916/558-6000 

Facsimile: 916/446-1611 

Email: cpost@weintraub.com

lclary@weintraub.com

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

California Restaurant Association 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

CALIFORNIA RESTAURANT 

ASSOCIATION, a California nonprofit mutual 

benefit corporation, 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

CITY OF EMERYVILLE, a California 

municipal corporation, 

 Defendant. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 3:16-cv-06660-JST 

STIPULATION TO CHANGE HEARING 

DATE ON CALIFORNIA RESTAURANT 

ASSOCIATON’S MOTION FOR 

PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION and CITY 

OF EMERYVILLE’S MOTION TO 

DISMISS; PROPOSED ORDER 

 Plaintiff California Restaurant Association (“CRA”) and Defendants City of Emeryville 

(“the City”) and Unite Here Local 2850 (“Local 2850”) (collectively, “the Parties”) hereby 

stipulate and agree that the hearing date currently set for March 9, 2017 at 2:00 p.m., in 

Courtroom 9 to hear CRA’s Motion for Preliminary Injunction and the City’s Motion to Dismiss 

(collectively, “the Motions”) be moved to March 23, 2017. This stipulation is made pursuant to 

Rules 6-1, 6-2, and 7-12 of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. 

 The Parties also hereby stipulate to the following briefing schedule for the respective 

opposition and reply briefs for the Motions: 

 Opposition Briefs: February 21, 2017 

Case 3:16-cv-06660-JST Document 23 Filed 02/10/17 Page 1 of 3
{2192470.DOC;} 2 Stipulation to Change Hearing Date; Proposed Order 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

weintraub tobin chediak coleman grodin law corporation

 Reply Briefs: February 28, 2017 

 There have been two previous time modifications in this case. First, on December 28, 

2016, the Parties agreed by stipulation (Dkt. No. 11) that the City’s responsive pleading deadline 

would be extended from January 4, 2017 to January 18, 2017. Second, on January 10, 2017, the 

Court entered an Order (Dkt. No. 13) granting the Parties’ stipulation to extend the City’s 

responsive pleading deadline to January 31, 2017, reserve a March 9, 2017 hearing date on the 

Motions, and set a corresponding briefing schedule. 

 Subsequent to the prior stipulation setting a March 9, 2017 hearing date, CRA’s counsel 

has received notice to appear for a hearing in another matter and is no longer available on 

March 9. The City’s counsel in turn is scheduled to be in trial during the week of March 16, 2017. 

Accordingly, March 23, 2017 is the next available date on the Court’s motion calendar that 

counsel for all parties are available. 

 Continuing the hearing on the Motions will have no significant impact on the schedule for 

this case as the case is not yet at issue and no trial date has been scheduled. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

Dated: February 9, 2017 weintraub tobin chediak coleman grodin 

 law corporation 

 By: /s/ Lukas J. Clary 

 Lukas J. Clary 

 Attorneys for Plaintiff 

 California Restaurant Association 

Dated: February 9, 2017 Burke, Williams & Sorensen LLP 

 By: /s/ J. Leah Castella 

 J. Leah Castella 

 Attorneys for Defendant 

 City of Emeryville 

Dated: February 9, 2017 McCracken, Stemerman & Holsberry, LLP 

 By: /s/ Paul L. More 

 Paul L. More 

 Attorneys for Intervenor 

 UNITE HERE Local 2850` 

Case 3:16-cv-06660-JST Document 23 Filed 02/10/17 Page 2 of 3
{2192470.DOC;} 3 Stipulation to Change Hearing Date; Proposed Order 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

weintraub tobin chediak coleman grodin law corporation

PROPOSED ORDER 

 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: __________________ ____________________________________ 

 Hon. Jon S. Tigar 

February 10, 2017

Case 3:16-cv-06660-JST Document 23 Filed 02/10/17 Page 3 of 3