Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-03539/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-03539-2/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Lisa Bradley
Defendant
Patricia Jones
Plaintiff
ThyssenKrupp Elevator Corporation
Defendant

Document Text:

STIPULATION EXTENDING DATES 

Case No. C-05-3539-EMC - 1 - 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

BAYER & BORLASE 

HEATHER E. BORLASE [SBN 216729] 

ALAN B. BAYER [SBN 216706] 

912 Cole Street, #238 

San Francisco, CA 94117 

Telephone: (415) 558-9960 

Facsimile: (415) 558-9970 

Email: heatherborlase@aol.com 

Attorneys for Plaintiff Patricia Jones 

CARTER, CARTER & FRIES 

JAMES A. CARTER [SBN 33119] 

BRIAN M. CARTER [SBN 132710] 

MICHELLE Q. CARTER [SBN 184005] 

88 Kearny Street, 10th Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94108 

Telephone: (415) 989-4800 

Facsimile: (415) 989-4864 

Email: michelle@carterfries.com 

Attorneys for Defendants 

ThyssenKrupp Elevator Corporation & 

Lisa Bradley 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

PATRICIA JONES, 

 Plaintiff, 

 vs. 

THYSSENKRUPP ELEVATOR 

CORPORATION, a California business entity, 

form unknown, LISA BRADLEY, an 

individual, and DOES 1-50, 

 Defendants. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: C-05-3539-EMC 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINES 

 Plaintiff and Defendants respectfully request a Court order: (1) extending the deadlines 

to hold an ADR phone conference, complete initial disclosures or state objections in Rule 26(f) 

Case 3:05-cv-03539-EMC Document 36 Filed 12/16/05 Page 1 of 3
STIPULATION EXTENDING DATES 

Case No. C-05-3539-EMC - 2 - 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Report, file and serve the Case Management Statement, and file and serve the Rule 26(f) 

Report; and (2) re-setting the Case Management Conference in this matter. 

 The current deadline is December 28, 2005, and the current CMC is set for January 4, 

2006 at 1:30 p.m. The reason for the stipulated request to enlarge time is that the Court 

currently has under submission various Motions. Depending on the Court’s rulings on the 

Motions, this matter may be remanded to State Court. 

The parties believe that it is in the interests of economy and efficiency to extend the 

various deadlines in this matter in order to allow the Court to decide the Motions prior to those 

items coming due. At this time, the parties are unaware of precisely which claims and which 

defendants are the subject of the instant litigation. 

Should the Court remand the matter, any and all Federal court deadlines would thereafter 

be inapplicable and moot, and the case would become subject to California procedural rules, 

rather than Federal procedural rules. The parties wish to avoid any unnecessary effort and 

expense connected with making the initial disclosures and complying with the other related 

requirements, in the event that the Court decides to remand this matter back to State court. (See 

Declaration of Alan B. Bayer in Support.) 

 Therefore, in light of the present procedural status of this case, the parties hereby 

stipulate and respectfully request that the Court extend the deadlines set forth in the September 

1, 2005 Order Setting Initial Case Management Conference as follows: 

 1. The events currently scheduled to be completed by December 28, 2005 shall be 

completed by a date that is 14 days after entry of any Order denying the Motion to Remand. 

 2. The CMC in this matter, currently scheduled for January 4, 2006 shall be continued 

to a date that is 21 days after entry of any Order denying the Motion to Remand. 

///

///

///

///

the next Wednesday following 

Case 3:05-cv-03539-EMC Document 36 Filed 12/16/05 Page 2 of 3
STIPULATION EXTENDING DATES 

Case No. C-05-3539-EMC - 3 - 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

This schedule would allow the parties ample time to meet and confer and prepare the necessary 

documents if the case is maintained in Federal Court. 

 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

Dated: December 15, 2005 

CARTER, CARTER & FRIES BAYER & BORLASE 

By: /s/Michelle Q. Carter By: /s/Alan B. Bayer

Michelle Q. Carter Alan B. Bayer 

Attorneys for Defendants Attorneys for Plaintiff 

 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated:___________ _________________________________________

 The Hon. Edward M. Chen 

 U.S. Magistrate Judge 

 Northern District of California 

12/16/05 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

Judge Edward M. Chen

Case 3:05-cv-03539-EMC Document 36 Filed 12/16/05 Page 3 of 3