Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-00977/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-00977-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Dorniese Wallace
Plaintiff
Warden
Defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DORNIESE WALLACE,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-06-0977 LKK KJM P

vs.

WARDEN,

Defendant. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

By an order filed June 6, 2006 plaintiff was ordered to file an in forma pauperis

affidavit within thirty days and was cautioned that failure to do so would result in a

recommendation that this action be dismissed. The thirty day period has now expired, and

plaintiff has not responded to the court’s order. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY

RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice.

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty

days after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written

objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned

“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Any reply to the objections

shall be served and filed within ten days after service of the objections. The parties are advised

Case 2:06-cv-00977-LKK -KJM Document 13 Filed 07/25/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District

Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: July 24, 2006.

______________________________________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

/mp

wall0977.fifp

Case 2:06-cv-00977-LKK -KJM Document 13 Filed 07/25/06 Page 2 of 2