Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-04668/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-04668-2/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Elaine L. Chao
Plaintiff
Local 10, International Longshore and Warehouse Union
Defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

No. C 06-4668 VRW

SCOTT N. SCHOOLS (SC 9990)

United States Attorney

JOANN M. SWANSON (CSBN 88143)

Chief, Civil Division

STEVEN J. SALTIEL (CSBN 202292)

Assistant United States Attorney

450 Golden Gate Avenue, Box 36055

San Francisco, California 94102

Telephone: (415) 436-6996

FAX: (415) 436-6748

Attorneys for Plaintiff

BETH A. ROSS (SBN 141337)

JACOB F. RUKEYSER (SBN 233781)

LEONARD CARDER, LLP

1188 Franklin Street, Suite 201

San Francisco, CA 94109

Telephone: (415) 771-6400

Facsimile: (415) 771-7010

Attorneys for Defendant

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

ELAINE L. CHAO, Secretary of Labor,

U.S. Department of Labor,

Plaintiff,

v.

LOCAL 10, INTERNATIONAL

LONGSHORE AND WAREHOUSE

UNION,

Defendant.

 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. 06-4668 VRW 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]

ORDER AMENDING BRIEFING

SCHEDULE AND CONTINUING

HEARING DATE ON CROSSMOTIONS FO SUMMARY

JUDGMENT

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED and jointly requested, by and between the parties hereto,

through their undersigned counsel, that the briefing schedule for cross-motions for summary

judgment be amended as set forth below, and that the summary judgment motion hearing be

continued from September 6, 2007 until September 27, 2007. The parties’ stipulation and joint

Case 3:06-cv-04668-VRW Document 14 Filed 07/06/2007 Page 1 of 3

; MODIFIED BY COURT

Case 3:06-cv-04668-VRW Document 15 Filed 07/11/07 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

No. C 06-4668 VRW 2

request is based on the following:

1. On March 13, 2007, the Court held a Further Case Management Conference and set a

Summary Judgment motion hearing for September 6, 2007 at 2:00 p.m. At that time the parties

advised the Court that they would agree on a briefing schedule for cross-motions for summary

judgment. Accordingly, on April 20, 2007, Plaintiff’s Counsel wrote to advise the Court that the

parties had agreed to the following briefing schedule: 

July 5, 2007: Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment

July 30, 2007: Defendant’s Opposition and Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment

August 13, 2007: Plaintiff’s Reply and Opposition to Cross-Motion

August 23, 2007: Defendant’s Reply

2. Due to a death in the family, Plaintiff’s Counsel has been unavailable from June 19

through July 1. In addition, Plaintiff’s Counsel now has a scheduling conflict with the

September 6, 2007 hearing date. Plaintiff’s Counsel is counsel of record in an action pending in

the Central District of California entitled Deborah Valenzuela v. Henry Paulson, No. CV 06-

1960 PSG (AJWx). On June 22, 2007, the Court in the Valenzuela case continued the 7-day jury

trial until September 4, 2007. 

3. Based on the foregoing, the parties respectfully request that the briefing schedule be

amended as follows: 

July 16, 2007: Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment

August 13, 2007: Defendant’s Opposition and Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment

August 27, 2007: Plaintiff’s Reply and Opposition to Cross-Motion

September 10, 2007: Defendant’s Reply

In addition, the parties respectfully request that the Summary Judgment hearing be continued

until September 27, 2007 at 2:00 p.m. 

4. The parties are not seeking continue any of the other case management dates in the

November 28, 2006 Civil Minute Order. A trial date has not been set in this case. 

\\

\\

Case 3:06-cv-04668-VRW Document 14 Filed 07/06/2007 Page 2 of 3 Case 3:06-cv-04668-VRW Document 15 Filed 07/11/07 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

No. C 06-4668 VRW 3

DATED: July 2, 2007 SCOTT N. SCHOOLS

United States Attorney

 /s/ 

STEVEN J. SALTIEL

Assistant United States Attorney

DATED: July 2, 2007 LEONARD CARDER, LLP

 /s/ 

PHIL A. THOMAS

Attorneys for Defendant

[PROPOSED] ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, AND GOOD CAUSE HAVING BEEN SHOWN, IT

IS HEREBY ORDERED that the briefing schedule for cross-motions for summary judgment

previously agreed to by the parties is amended as followed: 

July 16, 2007: Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment

August 13, 2007: Defendant’s Opposition and Cross-Motion for Summary

Judgment

August 27, 2007: Plaintiff’s Reply and Opposition to Cross-Motion

September 10, 2007: Defendant’s Reply

The hearing on the cross-motions for summary judgment is continued until September 27, 2007

at 2:00 p.m. 

__________________________

HON. VAUGHN R. WALKER

United States District Chief Judge

DATED:

Case 3:06-cv-04668-VRW Document 14 Filed 07/06/2007 Page 3 of 3

July 26,2007 Aug 16,2007 Sept 6,2007 Sept 20,2007 October 11, 2007 7/11/2007

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

AS MODIFIED

Judge Vaughn R Walker

at 2:00 p.m.

Case 3:06-cv-04668-VRW Document 15 Filed 07/11/07 Page 3 of 3