Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-00901/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-00901-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Bahar Mikhak
Plaintiff
University of Phoenix
Defendant

Document Text:

{00465650.DOC} 3:16-cv-00901-CRB

JOINT STIPULATION TO MODIFY MOTION BRIEFING SCHEDULE

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

William C. McNeil, III, State Bar No. 64392

Noah A. Phillips, State Bar No. 306832

The LEGAL AID SOCIETY

 – EMPLOYMENT LAW CENTER

180 Montgomery Street, Suite 600

San Francisco, CA 94104

Telephone: (415) 864-8848

Facsimile: (415) 593-0096

Emails: wmcneill@las-elc.org

 nphillips@las-elc.org

Howard Moore, Jr., State Bar No. 55228

MOORE & MOORE

1563 Solano Avenue, #204

Berkeley, California 94707-2116

Telephone: (510) 542-7172

Facsimile: (510) 528-3024

Email: moorlaw@aol.com

Attorneys for Plaintiff

BAHAR MIKHAK

NEDA N. DAL CIELO, Bar No. 161982

KIMBERLY GEE, Bar No. 264894

LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.

50 W. San Fernando, 15th Floor

San Jose, California 95113.2303

Telephone: 408.998.4150

Facsimile: 408.288.5686

Emails: ndalcielo@littler.com

kramos@littler.com

Attorneys for Defendant

UNIVERSITY OF PHOENIX, INC.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISCTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISCTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BAHAR MIKHAK, an individual,

Plaintiff,

v.

UNIVERSITY OF PHOENIX INC., an 

Arizona corporation,

Defendant.

Case No. 3:16-cv-00901-CRB

JOINT STIPULATION TO MODIFY

MOTION BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND

ORDER

Hearing Date: June 17, 2016

Time: 8:30 AM

Courtroom: 6. 17th Floor

Judge: Honorable Charles R. Breyer

Case 3:16-cv-00901-CRB Document 16 Filed 05/10/16 Page 1 of 4
{00465650.DOC} 1 3:16-cv-00901-CRB

JOINT STIPULATION TO MODIFY MOTION BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WHEREAS, on April 25, 2016, Defendant University of Phoenix ("Defendant") filed a Notice of 

Motion and Motion to Compel Arbitration and to Dismiss (“Motion to Compel”) Plaintiff's 

Complaint ("Complaint") or, in the alternative to this Action (“Motion to Compel”), where it 

noticed a hearing date of June 17, 2016, before the Honorable Charles R. Breyer.

WHEREAS, pursuant to Civil L.R. 7-3 of the Local Rules of Practice in Civil Proceedings 

before the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, the present deadline 

for Plaintiff to file and serve her Opposition to the Motion to Compel is May 9, 2017and the 

deadline for Defendant to file and serve its Reply is presently May 16, 2016.

WHEREAS, Plaintiff’s counsel, Howard Moore, Jr., returned to Atlanta Georgia over the 

weekend of April 30, 2016 to attend a funeral, and therefore, his time to address the issues 

presented by Defendant’s Motion has been severely curtailed.

WHEREAS, Plaintiff’s counsel William C. McNeill, III, also had a long schedule trip planned to 

the East Coast and therefore, his time to address Defendant’s motion has also been severely 

curtailed.

NOW THEREFORE, Plaintiff Bahar Mikhak and Defendant, by and through their undersigned 

counsel, HEREBY STIPULATE AND AGREE AS FOLLOWS:

1. Plaintiff is afforded an extension, until May 20, 2016, to file and serve her 

Opposition to the Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint;

2. Defendant is afforded an extension, until June 3, 2016, to file and serve its Reply 

to Plaintiff's Opposition to the Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint.

//

//

//

Case 3:16-cv-00901-CRB Document 16 Filed 05/10/16 Page 2 of 4
{00465650.DOC} 2 3:16-cv-00901-CRB

JOINT STIPULATION TO MODIFY MOTION BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Dated: May 5, 2016 /s/ Neda N. Dal Cielo 

NEDA N. DAL CIELO

LITTLER MENDELSON

A Professional Corporation 

Attorneys for Defendant UNIVERSITY OF 

PHOENIX, INC.

Dated: May 5, 2016 /s/ William C. McNeill, III

WILLIAM C. McNEILL, III

NOAH A. PHILLIPS 

LEGAL AID SOCIETY –

EMPLOYMENT LAW CENTER

Counsel for Plaintiff BAHAR MIKHAK

Dated: May 5, 2016 /s/ Howard Moore, Jr. 

HOWARD MOORE, JR. 

MOORE & MOORE

Counsel for Plaintiff BAHAR MIKHAK

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 6, 2016

CHARLES R. BREYER

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:16-cv-00901-CRB Document 16 Filed 05/10/16 Page 3 of 4
{00465650.DOC} 3 3:16-cv-00901-CRB

JOINT STIPULATION TO MODIFY MOTION BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

GENERAL ORDER 45 ATTESTATION

In accordance with General Order 45, concurrence in the filing of this document has been 

obtained from each of the signatories, and I shall maintain records to support this concurrence 

for subsequent production for the court if so ordered or for inspection upon request by a party.

/S/ William C. McNeill, III

William C. McNeill, III

Case 3:16-cv-00901-CRB Document 16 Filed 05/10/16 Page 4 of 4