Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-01472/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-01472-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Raymond Wright
Petitioner
James A. Yates
Respondent

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RAYMOND WRIGHT, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

v. )

)

)

JAMES A. YATES, )

)

Respondent. )

)

___________________________________ )

CV F 05- 1472 OWW WMW HC

ORDER ADOPTING

FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS RE

DISMISSAL OF PETITION

[Doc. 10]

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas

corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. 

On February 2, 2006, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations

herein. These findings and recommendations were served on the parties and contained notice

to the parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within

thirty days. No objections were filed. Petitioner’s lack of objection to the dismissal of this

case is indicated by the fact in response to the findings and recommendations, he filed a

motion to voluntarily dismiss this case.

Case 1:05-cv-01472-OWW -WMW Document 13 Filed 03/15/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 2

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)C) this court has

conducted a de novo review of this case. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708

F.2d 452, 454 (9 Cir. 1983). Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the th

findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis. 

Based on the foregoing, it is HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations issued by the Magistrate Judge on 

 February 2, 2006, are a adopted in full;

2. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is dismissed;

3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment for Respondent and to close this

case. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 15, 2006 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger 

emm0d6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:05-cv-01472-OWW -WMW Document 13 Filed 03/15/06 Page 2 of 2