Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-00651/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-00651-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Sproqit Technologies, Inc.
Counter-claimant
Visto Corporation
Counter-claimant

Document Text:

MANATT, PHELPS &

PHILLIPS, LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

PALO ALTO

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 - 1 - 

PROPOSED ORDER FOR VISTO AND SPROQIT’S 

JOINT MOTION FOR 

ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF 

PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 7-11 

CASE NO. C 04-0651 EMC 

20150165.1

MANATT, PHELPS & PHILLIPS, LLP 

RONALD S. KATZ (State Bar No. 85713) 

ROBERT D. BECKER (State Bar No. 160648) 

J. BRUCE MCCUBBREY (State Bar No. 38817) 

MICHELLE GILLETTE (State Bar No. 178734) 

1001 Page Mill Road, Building 2 

Palo Alto, CA 94304-1006 

Telephone: (650) 812-1300 

Facsimile: (650) 213-0260 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

VISTO CORPORATION 

DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP 

SRI K. SANKARAN (State Bar No. 236584) 

555 California Street, Suite 1000 

San Francisco, CA 94104-1513 

Telephone: (415) 781-1989 

Facsimile: (415) 398-3249 

Devan V. Padmanabhan (Admitted pro hac vice) 

Suite 1500, 50 South Sixth Street 

Minneapolis, MN 55402-1498 

Telephone: (612) 341-2600 

Attorneys for Defendant

SPROQIT TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

VISTO CORPORATION, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

SPROQIT TECHNOLOGIES, INC., 

Defendant. 

Case No. C 04-0651 EMC 

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING VISTO 

AND SPROQIT’S JOINT MOTION FOR 

ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF PURSUANT 

TO LOCAL RULE 7-11 REGARDING USE 

OF DEMONSTRATIVES FOR ORAL 

ARGUMENT ON ITS MOTION FOR 

PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION 

Hearing Date: January 18, 2006 

Time: 10:30 a.m. 

Courtroom: C, 15th Floor 

Judge: Hon. Edward M. Chen 

Case 3:04-cv-00651-EMC Document 120 Filed 01/12/06 Page 1 of 2
MANATT, PHELPS &

PHILLIPS, LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

PALO ALTO

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 - 2 - 

PROPOSED ORDER FOR VISTO AND SPROQIT’S 

JOINT MOTION FOR 

ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF 

PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 7-11 

CASE NO. C 04-0651 EMC 

20150165.1

 Presently before the Court is Visto and Sproqit’s Joint Motion For Administrative Relief 

Pursuant To Local Rule 7-11 Regarding Use Of Demonstratives For Oral Argument On Visto’s 

Motion For Preliminary Injunction scheduled for hearing at 10:30 a.m. on January 18, 2006. 

 The parties have stipulated to the relief requested in this motion. 

 “PURSUANT TO THE PARTIES JOINT MOTION AND STIPULATION and good 

cause appearing, IT IS SO ORDERED that the parties’ Joint Motion for Administrative Relief is 

GRANTED. 

Dated: ____________ 

 

 __________________________________________ 

 Honorable Judge Edward M. Chen 

 United States District Court Magistrate Judge 

 

January 12, 2006

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Edward M. Chen

Case 3:04-cv-00651-EMC Document 120 Filed 01/12/06 Page 2 of 2