Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cr-00380/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cr-00380-2/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Nina L. Donehue
Defendant
USA
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

CR 07-0380 SI 

SCOTT N. SCHOOLS (SCBN 9990)

United States Attorney

BRIAN J. STRETCH (CASBN 163973)

Chief, Criminal Division

ERIKA R. FRICK (CSBN 208150)

Assistant United States Attorney

450 Golden Gate Avenue, Box 36055

San Francisco, California 94102

Telephone: (415) 436-6973

Facsimile: (415) 436-7234

Email: erika.frick@usdoj.gov

Attorneys for Plaintiff

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

NINA L. DONEHUE,

Defendant.

 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CR 07-0380 SI

[PROPOSED] ORDER AND

STIPULATION EXCLUDING TIME

FROM JULY 9, 2007 TO JULY 27, 2007

FROM THE SPEEDY TRIAL ACT

CALCULATION (18 U.S.C.

§ 3161(h)(8)(A) & (B)(iv))

On July 19, 2007, the parties appeared before Your Honor for an initial appearance on the

above-captioned indictment. With the agreement of the parties, and with the consent of the

defendant, the Court enters this order (1) scheduling an initial appearance before the Honorable

Susan Illston on July 27, 2007, at 11 a.m.; and (2) documenting the exclusion of time under the

Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(A) & (B)(iv), from July 9, 2007 to July 27, 2007. The

parties agreed, and the Court found and held, as follows:

1. The parties agreed to an exclusion of time under the Speedy Trial Act. Failure to grant

the requested continuance would unreasonably deny both government and defense counsel

Case 3:07-cr-00380-SI Document 16 Filed 09/20/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

CR 07-0380 SI 2

reasonable time necessary for effective case preparation because the parties are still engaged in

discovery and other case preparation. 

2. Given these circumstances, the Court found that the ends of justice served by

excluding the period from July 9, 2007 to July 27, 2007 outweighed the best interest of the public

and the defendant in a speedy trial. See 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(A) & (B)(iv). 

3. Accordingly, and with the consent of the defendant, the Court ordered that the period

from July 9, 2007 to July 27, 2007 be excluded from Speedy Trial Act calculations under 18

U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(A) & (B)(iv). 

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

DATED: September 17, 2007 _____/s/___________________________

ERIKA R. FRICK

Assistant United States Attorney

DATED: September 17, 2007 _____/s/___________________________

 SHAWN HALBERT

Attorney for Nina L. Donehue

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED:_____________________ ________________________________

THE HON. JAMES LARSON

Chief United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:07-cr-00380-SI Document 16 Filed 09/20/07 Page 2 of 2