Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-15-06789/USCOURTS-ca4-15-06789-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Gregory Charles Krug
Appellant
Victor Loranth
Appellee

Document Text:

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-6789

GREGORY C. KRUG,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

VICTOR LORANTH, in his individual capacity,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Aiken. David C. Norton, District Judge. (1:14-

cv-01829-DCN)

Submitted: October 17, 2016 Decided: October 20, 2016

Before SHEDD, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Gregory C. Krug, Appellant Pro Se. Marshall Prince, II, Assistant 

United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 15-6789 Doc: 17 Filed: 10/20/2016 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Gregory Charles Krug appeals the district court’s order 

accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and dismissing 

Krug’s complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named 

Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971), for 

failure to exhaust administrative remedies.* We have reviewed the 

record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for 

the reasons stated by the district court. Krug v. Loranth, No. 

1:14-cv-01829-DCN (D.S.C. Jan. 6, 2015). We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before this court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

 * We remanded for the limited purpose of permitting the 

district court to determine whether Krug’s notice of appeal should 

be construed as a motion to reopen the appeal period, and if so, 

whether reopening was merited. On remand, the district court 

granted Krug’s motion to reopen.

Appeal: 15-6789 Doc: 17 Filed: 10/20/2016 Pg: 2 of 2