Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_23-cv-02538/USCOURTS-caed-2_23-cv-02538-3/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Khadzhimurad Babatov
Plaintiff
Ford Motor Company
Defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KHADZHIMURAD BABATOV,

Plaintiff,

v.

FORD MOTOR COMPANY,

Defendant.

Case No. 2:23-cv-2538-DJC-JDP (PS)

ORDER

On October 17, 2024, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and 

recommendations herein which were served on Plaintiff, and which contained notice 

that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within 

fourteen days. No objections were filed.

The Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United 

States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The Magistrate Judge’s conclusions of law 

are reviewed de novo. See Robbins v. Carey, 481 F.3d 1143, 1147 (9th Cir. 2007) 

(“[D]eterminations of law by the magistrate judge are reviewed de novo by both the 

district court and [the appellate] court . . . .”). Having reviewed the file, the Court finds 

the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the proper 

analysis.

Case 2:23-cv-02538-DJC-JDP Document 7 Filed 12/30/24 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The proposed Findings and Recommendations filed October 17, 2024, are 

ADOPTED;

2. This action is dismissed without prejudice for failure to timely complete 

service of process; and 

3. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: December 27, 2024 

Hon. Daniel J. Calabretta

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:23-cv-02538-DJC-JDP Document 7 Filed 12/30/24 Page 2 of 2