Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-08-06266/USCOURTS-ca4-08-06266-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Edson Furtado
Appellant
State of Maryland
Appellee
Cornelius J. Vaugheys
Appellee

Document Text:

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-6266

EDSON FURTADO,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

CORNELIUS J. VAUGHEYS, Judge; STATE OF MARYLAND,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Greenbelt. Roger W. Titus, District Judge. (8:07-cv03251-RWT)

Submitted: April 24, 2008 Decided: April 30, 2008

Before KING and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior Circuit

Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Edson Furtado, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 08-6266 Doc: 11 Filed: 04/30/2008 Pg: 1 of 2
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Edson Furtado appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed

the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny

Furtado’s motion for appointment of counsel and affirm for the

reasons stated by the district court. Furtado v. Vaugheys, No.

8:07-cv-03251-RWT (D. Md. Jan. 31, 2008). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Appeal: 08-6266 Doc: 11 Filed: 04/30/2008 Pg: 2 of 2