Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-16-01093/USCOURTS-ca4-16-01093-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Antonio Mosley
Petitioner

Document Text:

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-1093

In Re: ANTONIO MOSLEY, a/k/a Abdullah Hamid,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. 

(3:11-cr-00336-RJC-1; 3:14-cv-00399-RJC)

Submitted: May 12, 2016 Decided: June 8, 2016

Before MOTZ, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Petition dismissed in part and denied in part by unpublished per 

curiam opinion.

Antonio Mosley, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 16-1093 Doc: 9 Filed: 06/08/2016 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Antonio Mosley petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging 

that the district court has unduly delayed in his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 

(2012) action in ruling on his motion for access to sealed court 

records and his motion for bond. He further claims that the 

district court has unduly delayed in ruling on his 18 U.S.C. 

§ 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for sentence reduction. 

Because the district court’s criminal docket reveals that the 

court denied Mosley’s § 3582(c)(2) motion on February 5, 2016, we 

dismiss Mosley’s mandamus petition in part as moot. Moreover, our 

review of the civil docket does not reveal undue delay in the 

district court. Accordingly, we deny the mandamus petition in 

part. We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and deny 

Mosley’s motion for release on bail. We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before this court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DISMISSED IN PART

AND DENIED IN PART

Appeal: 16-1093 Doc: 9 Filed: 06/08/2016 Pg: 2 of 2