Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-16-01323/USCOURTS-ca4-16-01323-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Alexandra M. Fotos
Appellee
Neil Harpe
Appellee
Edar Y. Rogler
Appellant

Document Text:

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-1323

EDAR Y. ROGLER,

 Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

ALEXANDRA M. FOTOS, in her personal capacity, in her 

landlord capacity, in her premise owner capacity, for 

Christine Fotos, d/b/a Alexandra M. Fotos; NEIL HARPE,

 Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

Maryland, at Baltimore. William D. Quarles, Jr., District 

Judge. (1:14-cv-00228-JKB)

Submitted: August 25, 2016 Decided: August 29, 2016

Before NIEMEYER, DIAZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Edar Y. Rogler, Appellant Pro Se. Anne Marie McGinley, DECARO, 

DORAN, SICILIANO, GALLAGHER & DEBLASIS, LLP, Bowie, Maryland, 

for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 16-1323 Doc: 19 Filed: 08/29/2016 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Edar Y. Rogler appeals the district court’s orders 

dismissing her complaint and awarding attorney’s fees and costs

to Defendants and denying her motion to reconsider the order.

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and 

affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Rogler v. 

Fotos, No. 1:14-cv-00228-JKB (D. Md. Dec. 9, 2014; Oct. 22, 

2015; Jan. 21, 2016; Feb. 26, 2016). We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before this court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Appeal: 16-1323 Doc: 19 Filed: 08/29/2016 Pg: 2 of 2