Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_09-cv-00095/USCOURTS-caed-2_09-cv-00095-8/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Pranika Joshi
Plaintiff
Rakesh Joshi
Plaintiff
Starbucks Corporation
Defendant

Document Text:

STIPULATION AND ORDER FURTHER EXTENDING PLAINTIFFS’ TIME TO FILE MOTION FOR 

ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND RELATED NONTAXABLE EXPENSES 

JOSHI V. STARBUCKS, CASE NO. 2:09-CV-00095-FCD-DAD 

113881.1 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

JASON H. WILSON (State Bar No. 140269) 

EILEEN M. AHERN (State Bar No. 216822) 

WILLENKEN WILSON LOH & LIEB LLP 

707 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 3850 

Los Angeles, CA 90071 

Telephone: (213) 955-8030 

Facsimile: (213) 955-9250 

E-mail: jwilson@willenken.com

 eahern@willenken.com

Attorneys for Defendant 

STARBUCKS CORPORATION 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

RAKESH JOSHI and PRANIKA 

JOSHI, 

 Plaintiffs, 

 vs. 

STARBUCKS CORPORATION, a 

Washington corporation, and DOES 1 

through 10, inclusive, 

 Defendant. 

 Case No. 2:09-CV-00095 FCD DAD 

STIPULATION AND ORDER 

FURTHER EXTENDING 

PLAINTIFFS’ TIME TO FILE 

MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES 

AND RELATED NONTAXABLE 

EXPENSES 

/ / / 

/ / / 

Case 2:09-cv-00095-FCD-DAD Document 113 Filed 02/09/10 Page 1 of 3
- 1- 

STIPULATION AND ORDER FURTHER EXTENDING PLAINTIFFS’ TIME TO FILE MOTION FOR 

ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND RELATED NONTAXABLE EXPENSES 

JOSHI V. STARBUCKS, CASE NO. 2:09-CV-00095-FCD-DAD 

113881.1 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Plaintiffs Rakesh Joshi and Pranika Joshi (“Plaintiffs”) and defendant Starbucks 

Corporation (“Starbucks”), through their respective counsel (collectively, the 

“Parties”), submit the following stipulation: 

WHEREAS Plaintiffs filed a Notice of Acceptance of Starbucks’ Federal Rule 

of Civil Procedure 68 Offer of Judgment on January 12, 2010, which provided that 

Plaintiffs would provide to this Court a suitable bill of costs and itemizations for 

reasonable attorney fees; 

WHEREAS this Court entered such judgment on January 12, 2010; 

WHEREAS, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54 and Local Rule 

292(b), Plaintiffs’ motion for attorneys’ fees and related nontaxable expenses 

originally was due on January 26, 2010; 

WHEREAS this Court entered the Parties’ stipulation and proposed order to 

extend the deadline for Plaintiffs’ motion for attorneys’ fees and related nontaxable 

expenses by fourteen (14) days to February 9, 2010, such that the Parties would have 

the opportunity to reach an agreement as to the amount of Plaintiffs’ attorneys’ fees 

and related nontaxable expenses to be paid by Starbucks without the need for motion 

practice; 

WHEREAS the Parties have reached an agreement as to an agreed-upon 

amount of reasonable attorneys’ fees, related nontaxable expenses and costs to be 

paid by Starbucks, and are currently finalizing a written settlement agreement 

between the parties; 

WHEREAS, the Parties agree that the deadline for Plaintiffs’ motion for 

attorneys’ fees and related nontaxable expenses should be extended by fourteen (14) 

days such that the Parties have the opportunity to finalize the written settlement 

agreement without the need for motion practice, 

/ / / 

/ / / 

Case 2:09-cv-00095-FCD-DAD Document 113 Filed 02/09/10 Page 2 of 3
- 2- 

STIPULATION AND ORDER FURTHER EXTENDING PLAINTIFFS’ TIME TO FILE MOTION FOR 

ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND RELATED NONTAXABLE EXPENSES 

JOSHI V. STARBUCKS, CASE NO. 2:09-CV-00095-FCD-DAD 

113881.1 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the Parties, by and through 

their respective attorneys of record, as follows: The time for Plaintiffs to file a 

motion for attorneys’ fees and related nontaxable expenses shall be extended up to 

and including February 23, 2010. 

Dated: February 8, 2010 WILLENKEN WILSON LOH & LIEB, LLP 

s/Eileen M. Ahern 

Eileen M. Ahern 

Attorneys for Defendant 

Starbucks Corporation 

DATED: February 8, 2010 THE LACROIX LAW FIRM, P.C. 

s/John K. Buche 

John K. Buche

Damian E. LaCroix 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

Rakesh Joshi and Pranika Joshi 

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: February 9, 2010 

Case 2:09-cv-00095-FCD-DAD Document 113 Filed 02/09/10 Page 3 of 3