Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-00651/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-00651-8/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Sproqit Technologies, Inc.
Counter-claimant
Visto Corporation
Counter-claimant

Document Text:

U

nite

d

State

s

District C

o

u

rt

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

VISTO CORPORATION,

Plaintiff,

v.

SPROQIT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

Defendant.

___________________________________/

No. C-04-0651 EMC

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION TO SHORTEN TIME TO

HEAR ITS MOTION TO CONTINUE

(Docket No. 170)

Plaintiff Visto Corporation has asked the Court to hear a motion to continue the claim

construction hearing, currently set for July 5, 2006, on shortened time. The Court instructed the

parties to meet and confer to see if they could come to an agreement regarding the request. The

parties could not agree on a briefing schedule or a hearing date; however, Defendant Sproqit

Technologies, Inc. did not oppose shortened time in principal. Accordingly, the Court hereby

GRANTS Visto’s request for shortened time. The Court also notes that, without shortened time,

Visto’s motion to continue could not be heard prior to the claim construction hearing.

The Court further orders the following briefing schedule for the motion to continue: The

opposition brief shall be filed no later than 4:00 p.m. on June 21, 2006, and the reply brief shall be

filed no later than 4:00 p.m. on June 23, 2006. In addition, the opposition brief shall be no longer

than 15 pages and the reply brief no longer than 10 pages. Absent further order from the Court, there

shall be no hearing for the motion to continue (i.e., the matter shall be submitted on the papers).

///

Case 3:04-cv-00651-EMC Document 174 Filed 06/16/06 Page 1 of 2
U

nite

d

State

s

District C

o

u

rt

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Finally, the Court orders Visto to immediately e-file its proposed motion to continue, which

was previously submitted as Exhibit I of the Gillette Declaration.

This order disposes of Docket No. 170.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 16, 2006

 

 EDWARD M. CHEN

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:04-cv-00651-EMC Document 174 Filed 06/16/06 Page 2 of 2