Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-02654/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-02654-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Global Travel International, Inc.
Defendant
Mary E. Tye
Plaintiff

Document Text:

{7622/002/00612342.DOCX} 1 

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

MARQUIS AURBACH COFFING

10001 Park Run Drive 

Las Vegas, Nevada 89145 

Telephone: (702) 382-0711 

Facsimile: (702) 382-5816 

Candice E. Renka #264375 

WANGER JONES HELSLEY PC 

265 E. River Park Circle, Suite 310 

Fresno, California 93720 

Telephone: (559) 233-4800 

Facsimile: (559) 233-9330 

Patrick D. Toole #190118 

Dylan J. Crosby #299536 

Attorneys for: Plaintiff 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – SACRAMENTO DIVISION 

MARY E. TYE, on behalf of herself and all 

others similarly situated, 

 Plaintiff, 

 vs. 

GLOBAL TRAVEL INTERNATIONAL, 

INC., a Florida corporation; DOES I 

through X, inclusive; and ROE 

CORPORATIONS I through X, inclusive, 

 Defendant(s) 

Case No. 2:15-cv-02654-KJM-AC 

STIPULATION TO EXTEND 

TIME TO RESPOND TO 

COMPLAINT 

Complaint Filed: December 23, 2015 

Hon. Kimberly J. Mueller 

 

Case 2:15-cv-02654-KJM-AC Document 10 Filed 04/26/16 Page 1 of 4
{7622/002/00612342.DOCX} 2 

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 Plaintiff Mary E. Tye, on behalf of herself and all other similarly situated 

(“Plaintiff” or “Tye”) and Defendant Global Travel International, Inc. (“Defendant” or “GTI”) 

(collectively the “Parties”), by and through their respective counsel, stipulate and agree as 

follows: 

RECITALS 

 WHEREAS, Plaintiff filed the Complaint against Defendant on or about 

December 23, 2015; 

 WHEREAS, Plaintiff was unable to serve Defendant until February 1, 2016; 

 WHEREAS, the Parties previously requested one extension of time to respond 

to the Complaint to conduct preliminary discovery regarding ownership of the telephone 

number Plaintiff has alleged called her; 

 WHEREAS, the Parties request was construed as an Ex Parte request because 

Defendant’s Counsel was not yet admitted to this Court pro hac vice; 

 WHEREAS, Defendant Counsel has now been admitted to this Court pro hac 

vice; 

 WHEREAS, the Parties have been diligently working together to subpoena 

phone records to determine the source of the alleged illegal call and the proper parties to this 

action; 

 WHEREAS, the Parties have issued three separate subpoenas after learning that 

each company subpoenaed was not the source of the alleged illegal call or property party to 

this action; 

 WHEREAS, the Parties agree that a short continuance of (30) days should be 

sufficient to resolve the issue; 

 WHEREAS, the Parties agree that the new deadline for Defendant to file a 

response to the Complaint shall be Monday June 1, 2016; 

 WHEREAS, the Parties agree that the Status Conference should be continued to 

Thursday, July 7, 2016, or as the Court otherwise orders; 

/ / / 

Case 2:15-cv-02654-KJM-AC Document 10 Filed 04/26/16 Page 2 of 4
{7622/002/00612342.DOCX} 3 

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION 

1. Plaintiff consents to an additional extension of time of thirty (30) days 

for Defendant to file a response to the Complaint. 

2. The Parties agree that the new deadline for Defendant to file a response 

to the Complaint shall be June 1, 2016. 

3. The Parties agree that the Status Conference should be continued to July 

7, 2016, at 2:30 p.m. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED 

Dated: April 18, 2016 MARQUIS AURBACH COFFING

By /s/ Candice E. Renka 

Candice E. Renka 

California Bar No. 264375 

10001 Park Run Drive 

Las Vegas, Nevada 89145 

WANGER JONES HELSLEY, PC 

Patrick D. Toole, Esq. 

California Bar No. 190118 

Dylan J. Crosby, Esq. 

California Bar No. 299536 

265 E. River Park Circle, Suite 300 

Fresno, CA 93729 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

Dated: April 18, 2016 MAC MURRY, PETERSEN, & SHUSTER LLP 

By /s/ Michele Shuster 

Michele Shuster 

Ohio Bar No. 0062500 

Pro hac vice 

6530 West Campus Oval, Suite 210 

New Albany, Ohio 43054 

Attorneys for Defendant 

Case 2:15-cv-02654-KJM-AC Document 10 Filed 04/26/16 Page 3 of 4
{7622/002/00612342.DOCX} 4 

ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT 

AND TO CONTINUE STATUS CONFERENCE 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO 

COMPLAINT AND TO CONTINUE STATUS CONFERENCE 

The Court has reviewed and considered the Second Stipulation to Extend Time 

to Respond to the Complaint and to Continue the Status Conference entered into by and 

between Plaintiff Mary E. Tye, on behalf of herself and all other similarly situated (“Plaintiff” 

or “Tye”) and Defendant Global Travel International, Inc. (“Defendant” or “GTI”). 

The Court being informed, and after full consideration of the Stipulation, 

concludes that the extensions agreed to therein shall be approved. 

 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED as follows: 

1. The Stipulation to Extend Time to Respond to the Complaint and to 

Continue the Status Conference is GRANTED; 

2. The new deadline for Defendant to file a response to the Complaint is 

June 1, 2016; 

3. The Status Conference previously set for May 26, 2016, at 2:30 p.m. is 

continued to Thursday, July 7, 2016 at 2:30 p.m. with the filing of a Joint Status Report due 

seven days prior. 

Dated: April 26, 2016. 

Case 2:15-cv-02654-KJM-AC Document 10 Filed 04/26/16 Page 4 of 4