Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_18-cv-00662/USCOURTS-caed-1_18-cv-00662-5/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
County of Fresno
Defendant
Farshad Oreizi
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE DATES SET IN THE COURT’S SCHEDULING 

ORDER DOCUMENT 19, DATED 04/15/19; DOCUMENT 21, DATED 07/29/19 

and DOCUMENT 22 DATED 10/14/19 

MCCORMICK, BARSTOW,

SHEPPARD, WAYTE &

CARRUTH LLP

7647 NORTH FRESNO STREET

FRESNO, CA 93720

McCormick, Barstow, Sheppard,

Wayte & Carruth LLP

Mart B. Oller IV, #149186

7647 North Fresno Street

Fresno, California 93720

Telephone: (559) 433-1300

Facsimile: (559) 433-2300

Attorneys for Defendant COUNTY OF FRESNO

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, FRESNO DIVISION

FARSHAD OREIZI,

Plaintiff,

v.

COUNTY OF FRESNO and DOES 1 through 

20, inclusive,

Defendants.

Case No. 1:18-CV-00662-AWI-EPG

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO 

CONTINUE DATES SET IN THE 

COURT’S SCHEDULING ORDER 

DOCUMENT 19, DATED 04/15/19; 

DOCUMENT 21, DATED 07/29/19 and 

DOCUMENT 22 DATED 10/14/19 

(ECF No. 24)

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED BY AND AMONG, Defendant County of Fresno and 

Plaintiff Farshad Oreizi, through their respective counsel:

Defendant County of Fresno and Plaintiff Farshad Oreizi, referred to herein as the “Parties,” 

hereby stipulate, request, and consent to the Court entering an Order to continue the dates set by this 

Court in Document 15 as set forth herein below. The parties mediated the case on August 13, 2019, 

without success and thereafter agreed to brief continuances regarding non-expert discovery to 

accommodate plaintiff’s counsel’s vacation and defendant’s counsel’s and his family’s health 

issues. (Document 19, 22.)

This request and stipulation is based on the fact that due to unavoidable delays encountered 

in proceeding with the completion of non-expert discovery, due to unexpected complications due to 

a concussion from football to the son of counsel for Defendant, Mart Oller, and Mr. Oller’s 

subsequent and continuing involvement in a trial before Judge Drozd, the parties have not had 

Case 1:18-cv-00662-JLT-EPG Document 25 Filed 12/05/19 Page 1 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE DATES SET IN THE COURT’S SCHEDULING 

ORDER DOCUMENT 19, DATED 04/15/19; DOCUMENT 21, DATED 07/29/19 

and DOCUMENT 22 DATED 10/14/19 

MCCORMICK, BARSTOW,

SHEPPARD, WAYTE &

CARRUTH LLP

7647 NORTH FRESNO STREET

FRESNO, CA 93720

sufficient time to complete same, nor will they have sufficient time under the current dates. The 

parties believe that the interests of judicial economy and justice are best served by the requested 

continuance of the dates below, which preserves the current trial date, pretrial date, and dispositive

motion filing date.

DISCOVERY DEADLINES:

Non-Expert Discovery: Current date: December 31, 2019

Proposed New Date: January 31, 2020

Expert Disclosure: Current date: October 30, 2019

Proposed New Date: January 31, 2020

Rebuttal Expert Disclosure: Current date: January 20, 2020

Proposed New Date: February 20, 2020

Expert Discovery: Current date: February 5, 2020

Proposed New Date: March 5, 2020

Dispositive Motion Filing Current date: February 16, 2020

Proposed New Date March 10, 2020

All other terms, conditions, and deadlines in the Court’s Scheduling Conference 

Order (ECF No. 15) shall remain in full force and effect.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Dated: December 2, 2019 McCORMICK, BARSTOW, SHEPPARD,

WAYTE & CARRUTH LLP

By: /s/ Mart B. Oller

Mart B. Oller IV

Attorneys for Defendant COUNTY OF FRESNO

/ / /

/ / /

/ / /

/ / /

/ / /

Case 1:18-cv-00662-JLT-EPG Document 25 Filed 12/05/19 Page 2 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE DATES SET IN THE COURT’S SCHEDULING 

ORDER DOCUMENT 19, DATED 04/15/19; DOCUMENT 21, DATED 07/29/19 

and DOCUMENT 22 DATED 10/14/19 

MCCORMICK, BARSTOW,

SHEPPARD, WAYTE &

CARRUTH LLP

7647 NORTH FRESNO STREET

FRESNO, CA 93720

Dated: December 2, 2019 LAW OFFICE OF PETER SEAN BRADLEY

By: /s/ Peter Sean Bradley

Peter Sean Bradley

Attorneys for Plaintiff FARSHAD OREIZI

Case 1:18-cv-00662-JLT-EPG Document 25 Filed 12/05/19 Page 3 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

4

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE DATES SET IN THE COURT’S SCHEDULING 

ORDER DOCUMENT 19, DATED 04/15/19; DOCUMENT 21, DATED 07/29/19 

and DOCUMENT 22 DATED 10/14/19 

MCCORMICK, BARSTOW,

SHEPPARD, WAYTE &

CARRUTH LLP

7647 NORTH FRESNO STREET

FRESNO, CA 93720

ORDER

Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties (ECF No. 24), and a finding of good cause, the 

Court orders the dates set forth in the Scheduling Order (ECF No. 15), as previously modified (ECF 

Nos. 19, 21, 23) is further modified as follows:

EVENT PRIOR DATE CONTINUED DATE

Non-Expert Discovery Cutoff December 31, 2019 January 31, 2020

Expert Disclosures December 31, 2019 January 31, 2020

Rebuttal Expert Disclosures January 20, 2020 February 20, 2020

Expert Discovery Completion February 5, 2020 March 5, 2020

Dispositive Motion Filing February 16, 2020 March 10, 2020

Pretrial Conference June 19, 2020, at 10:00 a.m. June 19, 2020, at 10:00 a.m.

Trial August 18, 2020, at 8:30 a.m. August 18, 2020, at 8:30 a.m.

All other terms, conditions, and deadlines in the Court’s Scheduling Conference Order (ECF

No. 15) shall remain in full force and effect.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: December 4, 2019 /s/

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:18-cv-00662-JLT-EPG Document 25 Filed 12/05/19 Page 4 of 4