Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-07-01898/USCOURTS-ca4-07-01898-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Clemson University
Appellee
Roslyn Holman
Appellant

Document Text:

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-1898

ROSLYN HOLMAN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

CLEMSON UNIVERSITY,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Florence. Terry L. Wooten, District Judge.

(4:05-cv-02727-TLW)

Submitted: January 29, 2008 Decided: February 12, 2008

Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Roslyn Holman, Appellant Pro Se. James William Logan, Jr., LOGAN,

JOLLY & SMITH, L.L.P., Anderson, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 07-1898 Doc: 14 Filed: 02/12/2008 Pg: 1 of 2
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Roslyn Holman appeals the district court’s order

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and granting

Defendant’s motion for summary judgment in her employment

discrimination action alleging retaliation. We have reviewed the

record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for

the reasons stated by the district court. Holman v. Clemson

University, No. 4:05-cv-02727-TLW (D.S.C. Aug. 23, 2007). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Appeal: 07-1898 Doc: 14 Filed: 02/12/2008 Pg: 2 of 2