Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-19-01575/USCOURTS-ca4-19-01575-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
William P. Barr
Respondent
Jennifer Maritza Iraheta Franco
Petitioner

Document Text:

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-1575

JENNIFER MARITZA IRAHETA FRANCO,

 Petitioner,

v.

WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General,

 Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals.

Submitted: February 20, 2020 Decided: March 4, 2020

Before MOTZ and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Abdoul A. Konare, KONARE LAW, Frederick, Maryland, for Appellant. Joseph H. Hunt, 

Assistant Attorney General, Anthony P. Nicastro, Assistant Director, S. Nicole Nardone, 

Office of Immigration Litigation, Civil Division, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF 

JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 19-1575 Doc: 44 Filed: 03/04/2020 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Jennifer Maritza Iraheta Franco, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions for 

review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals summarily affirming the 

Immigration Judge’s decision denying her applications for asylum, withholding of 

removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture. We have reviewed 

Franco’s claims, the administrative record, and the final administrative order of removal,

and conclude that the record evidence does not compel a ruling contrary to any of the 

agency’s factual findings, see 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(4)(B) (2018), and that substantial 

evidence supports the agency’s decision, see INS v. Elias-Zacarias, 502 U.S. 478, 481 

(1992). 

Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the agency. 

See In re Franco (B.I.A. Apr. 30, 2019). We deny the Attorney General’s motion for 

summary disposition as moot and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

USCA4 Appeal: 19-1575 Doc: 44 Filed: 03/04/2020 Pg: 2 of 2