Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-16-01713/USCOURTS-ca4-16-01713-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Sally Atkins
Appellee
Mary Ellen Barbera
Appellee
Lynne Battaglia
Appellee
Robert Bell
Appellee
Brent Benjamin
Appellee
Doran Bowers
Appellant
Katthleen Cox
Appellee
Robin Davis
Appellee
Clayton Greene
Appellee
Glen Harell
Appellee
Gregory Hilton
Appellee
Menis Ketchum
Appellee
Peter Krauser
Appellee
Allen Loughry
Appellee
Albert Matricciani
Appellee
Robert McDonald
Appellee
Charles Moylan
Appellee
Rory Perry
Appellee
Lawrence Rodowsky
Appellee
The State of Maryland
Appellee
The State of West Virginia
Appellee
Shirley Watts
Appellee
Margaret Workman
Appellee
Alexander Wright
Appellee

Document Text:

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-1713

DORAN BOWERS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

RORY PERRY; ROBIN DAVIS; BRENT BENJAMIN; MARGARET WORKMAN; 

MENIS KETCHUM; ALLEN LOUGHRY; THE STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA; 

GREGORY HILTON; PETER KRAUSER; ALEXANDER WRIGHT; ALBERT 

MATRICCIANI; CHARLES MOYLAN; LAWRENCE RODOWSKY; ROBERT BELL; 

MARY ELLEN BARBERA; GLEN HARELL; LYNNE BATTAGLIA; CLAYTON 

GREENE; SALLY ATKINS; ROBERT MCDONALD; SHIRLEY WATTS, and; 

THE STATE OF MARYLAND; KATTHLEEN COX,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern 

District of West Virginia, at Charleston. Joseph R. Goodwin, 

District Judge. (2:14-cv-27242)

Submitted: November 17, 2016 Decided: November 21, 2016

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and MOTZ and TRAXLER, Circuit 

Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Doran Bowers, Appellant Pro Se. Teresa Jean Lyons, HEDGES & 

LYONS, PLLC, Morgantown, West Virginia; Michele J. McDonald, 

Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 16-1713 Doc: 35 Filed: 11/21/2016 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Doran Bowers appeals the district court’s orders adopting 

the magistrate judge’s recommendation and dismissing with 

prejudice Bowers’ civil action, and denying Bowers’ Fed. R. Civ. 

P. 59(e) motion to alter or amend that judgment. We have 

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, 

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See

Bowers v. Perry, No. 2:14-cv-27242 (S.D.W. Va. Sept. 28, 2015 & 

June 16, 2016). We deny Bowers’ motions to correct the docket, 

to recuse the Clerk of Court, and to amend or correct prior 

orders entered by the Clerk. We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented 

in the materials before this court and argument would not aid 

the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Appeal: 16-1713 Doc: 35 Filed: 11/21/2016 Pg: 2 of 2