Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-00156/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-00156-3/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Rosanne Campbell
Respondent
Wade Edward Kelley
Petitioner

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

WADE EDWARD KELLEY, )

)

)

Petitioner, )

)

v. )

)

)

ROSANNE CAMPBELL, )

)

)

Respondent. )

)

 )

1:06-cv-00156 LJO-TAG (HC) 

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS (Doc. 18)

ORDER DISMISSING PETITION FOR WRIT

OF HABEAS CORPUS (Doc. 1)

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT

TO ENTER JUDGMENT

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254.

On April 3, 2008, the Magistrate Judge assigned to the case filed Findings and

Recommendations recommending the petition for writ of habeas corpus be dismissed because of

Petitioner’s failure to prosecute the case. (Doc. 18). The Findings and Recommendations were

served on all parties and contained notice that any objections were to be filed within fifteen days

from the date of service of that order. On April 24, 2008, Petitioner filed his objections as well

as a declaration in support of those objections. (Docs. 19 & 20). 

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted

Case 1:06-cv-00156-LJO -TAG Document 21 Filed 04/29/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

a de novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, including Petitioner’s

objections, the Court concludes that the Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations are

supported by the record and proper analysis. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed April 3, 2008 (Doc. 18), is ADOPTED

IN FULL;

2. This petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. 1), is DISMISSED; and

3. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to ENTER JUDGMENT and close the file. 

This order terminates the action in its entirety. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 29, 2008 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill 

b9ed48 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-00156-LJO -TAG Document 21 Filed 04/29/08 Page 2 of 2