Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_23-cv-02943/USCOURTS-caed-2_23-cv-02943-5/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Lee E. Haggerty
Plaintiff
Rob St. Andre
Defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LEE E. HAGGERTY,

Plaintiff,

v.

ROB ST. ANDRE,

Defendant.

No. 2:23-cv-2943 TLN CKD P

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

On September 27, 2024, plaintiff’s amended complaint was dismissed with leave to file a 

second amended complaint. The second amended complaint was due on December 16, 2024, and 

plaintiff has not filed a second amended complaint.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without 

prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 

after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections 

with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings 

and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified 

/////

/////

Case 2:23-cv-02943-TLN-CKD Document 22 Filed 01/03/25 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

time waives the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th 

Cir. 1991).

Dated: January 3, 2025

1

hagg2943.fta

_____________________________________

CAROLYN K. DELANEY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:23-cv-02943-TLN-CKD Document 22 Filed 01/03/25 Page 2 of 2