Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_09-cv-02685/USCOURTS-caed-2_09-cv-02685-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Christopher Coffelt
Plaintiff
Randall Der
Plaintiff
Donna Forman
Plaintiff
Stephen Goodwin
Plaintiff
Securitas Security Services USA, Inc.
Defendant
William Wolff
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

The failure of one or more of the parties to participate in 1

the preparation of the Joint Status Report does not excuse the other

parties from their obligation to timely file a status report in

accordance with this Order. In the event a party fails to participate

as ordered, the party timely submitting the status report shall include

a declaration explaining why it was unable to obtain the cooperation of

the other party or parties.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

STEPHEN GOODWIN; WILLIAM WOLFF; )

CHRISTOPHER COFFELT; RANDALL DER; )

DONNA FORMAN; as individuals and )

on behalf of all others similarly )

situated and the general public, ) 2:09-cv-02685-GEB-DAD 

)

Plaintiffs, )

) ORDER CONTINUING STATUS

v. ) (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING)

) CONFERENCE and FED. R. CIV.

SECURITAS SECURITY SERVICES USA, ) P. 4(m) NOTICE

INC., a Delaware Corporation, )

)

Defendant. )

)

Plaintiffs’ Status Report filed on January 15, 2010

reveals this case is not ready to be scheduled. Therefore, the

Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference (“status conference”) set

for February 1, 2010 is continued to March 15, 2010, at 9:00 a.m. 

A further joint status report shall be filed no later than fourteen

(14) days prior to the status conference.1

Plaintiffs are notified under Rule 4(m) of the Federal 

Rules of Civil Procedure (“Rule 4(m)”) that Defendant Securitas

Security Services USA, Inc. could be dismissed in this action under

Rule 4(m) unless Plaintiffs provide proof of service and/or “show[]

Case 2:09-cv-02685-KJM -DAD Document 6 Filed 01/27/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

good cause for the failure” to serve the Defendant within Rule

4(m)’s 120 day prescribed period, in a filing due no later than

4:00 p.m. on February 5, 2010.

Dated: January 26, 2010

 

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.

United States District Judge

Case 2:09-cv-02685-KJM -DAD Document 6 Filed 01/27/10 Page 2 of 2