Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cr-00423/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cr-00423-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Jason Goodman
Defendant
USA
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DANIEL J. BRODERICK, Bar #89424

Federal Defender

MARY M. FRENCH, Bar #126643

Supervising Assistant Federal Defender 

Designated Counsel for Service

801 I Street, 3rd Floor

Sacramento, California 95814

Telephone: (916) 498-5700

Attorney for Defendant

JASON GOODMAN

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

JASON GOODMAN,

Defendant.

_______________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CR-S-05-0423 DFL

 APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS 

 CORPUS AD PROSEQUENDUM

Date: December 14, 2006 

Time: 10:00 a.m.

Judge: Honorable David F. Levi 

Comes now the defendant, by the Federal Defender, and represents

as follows:

1. On June 2, 1999, the United States District Court for the

Eastern District of Michigan sentenced defendant JASON GOODMAN to 90

months imprisonment and a 5-year term of supervised release for his

conviction of one count of Conspiracy to Distribute a Controlled

Substance. He started his term of supervised release on July 1, 2005. 

Thereafter, on October 13, 2005, jurisdiction was transferred from the

Eastern District of Michigan to the Eastern District of California.

Case 2:05-cr-00423-DFL Document 10 Filed 11/13/06 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

2. In September 2006, Mr. Goodman was charged in Shasta County

Superior Court with Possession for Sale of Marijuana in violation of

California Health and Safety Code section 11359, a felony. 

3. Soon thereafter, Mr. Goodman pled to the charge and was

sentenced to two years incarceration at High Desert State Prison. 

According to Mr. Goodman’s state attorney, the sentencing judge ordered

that the state sentence run concurrent to Mr. Goodman’s federal

sentence on his supervised release petition. 

4. On September 22, 2006, a supervised release petition was

filed with the district court which alleged that Mr. Goodman violated

the terms of his supervised release by committing another federal,

state, or local crime as charged against him in Shasta County. 

5. Mr. Goodman is currently detained at the High Desert State

Prison in Susanville, California. Mr. Goodman requests that his

supervised release petition case be placed on this Court's calendar and

that he be transported to the district court to address the pending

petition. Mr. Goodman requests transportation to the district court so

that he may be sentenced, after admission of one or more violations, on

the pending supervised release petition so that the Shasta County

Superior Court Judge's order of a concurrent sentence may be

accomplished. 

6. In order to secure the presence of the defendant, it is

necessary that a Writ of Habeas Corpus Ad Prosequendum be issued

commanding the Warden, Sheriff or Jailor to produce the defendant in

court on said date, and at such other dates as may be necessary in

order to procure defendant's presence for other proceedings incident

thereto.

WHEREFORE, petitioner prays for an order directing the issuance of

Case 2:05-cr-00423-DFL Document 10 Filed 11/13/06 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3

a Writ of Habeas Corpus Ad Prosequendum, out of and under the seal of

this Court, directed to the Warden, Sheriff or Jailor, commanding him

to have and produce the above-named defendant in the United States

District Court at said time, and then and there to present the

defendant before the Court, and from day to day thereafter as may be

necessary, and at the termination of the proceedings against the

defendant, to return defendant to the custody of the Warden, Sheriff or

Jailor. A proposed Writ of Habeas Corpus Ad Prosequendum has been

separately lodged with the district court.

DATED: November 8, 2006. /s/ Mary M. French

 

MARY M. FRENCH

Supervising Assistant 

Federal Defender

Attorney for Defendant

JASON GOODMAN

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

O R D E R

 Upon reading the filing and foregoing application in that behalf, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that a Writ of Habeas Corpus Ad Prosequendum issue

as prayed for herein.

DATED: November 9, 2006.

/s/ David F. Levi 

HONORABLE DAVID F. LEVI

United States District Judge

Case 2:05-cr-00423-DFL Document 10 Filed 11/13/06 Page 3 of 3