Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-02591/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-02591-2/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Timothy C. Draper
Counter-defendant
Draper Fisher Jurvetson Management, LLC
Counter-defendant
U.S. Car Market, Inc.
Counter-claimant

Document Text:

MANATT, PHELPS &

PHILLIPS, LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

PALO ALTO

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS - Case No. C 06-2591

 1 

MANATT, PHELPS & PHILLIPS, LLP 

RONALD S. KATZ (BAR NO. CA 085713) 

E-mail: rkatz@manatt.com 

CHRISTOPHER L. WANGER (BAR NO. CA 164751) 

E-mail: cwanger@manatt.com 

JEFFREY J. LOKEY (BAR NO. CA 200825) 

E-mail: jlokey@manatt.com 

1001 Page Mill Road, Building 2 

Palo Alto, CA 94304-1006 

Telephone: (650) 812-1300 

Facsimile: (650) 213-0260 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs and Counterdefendants, 

DRAPER FISHER JURVETSON MANAGEMENT, LLC 

AND TIMOTHY C. DRAPER 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

DRAPER FISHER JURVETSON 

MANAGEMENT, LLC, a California 

Limited Liability Company and 

TIMOTHY C. DRAPER, an individual, 

Plaintiffs, 

vs. 

U.S. CAR MARKET, INC., a Delaware 

corporation, 

Defendant. 

Case No. C 06-2591-WHA 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

SELECTING ADR PROCESS 

AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS 

Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the 

following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5: 

The parties agree to participate in Court-sponsored mediation (ADR L.R. 6). 

Plaintiffs believe that the material facts in this matter are largely undisputed and that this 

case may be resolved on summary judgment. Plaintiffs also believe that the case cannot be 

resolved through ADR prior to a ruling on their contemplated motion for summary judgment. 

Case 3:06-cv-02591-WHA Document 16 Filed 06/30/2006 Page 1 of 2
 Case 3:06-cv-02591-WHA Document 22 Filed 08/02/06 Page 1 of 2
MANATT, PHELPS &

PHILLIPS, LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

PALO ALTO

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS - Case No. C 06-2591

 2 

Given these circumstances, the parties therefore request that a mediation take place within 45 

days of the Court’s Order on the summary judgment motion. 

Dated: June 29, 2006 MANATT, PHELPS & PHILLIPS, LLP 

By: /s/ Christopher L. Wanger 

Christopher L. Wanger 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs and Counterdefendants,

 DRAPER FISHER JURVETSON 

 MANAGEMENT, LLC & 

 TIMOTHY C. DRAPER 

Dated: June 29, 2006 ADDISON & DELANO, P.A. 

By: /s/ Caryl E. Delano 

Caryl E. Delano 

Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant, 

 U.S. CAR MARKET, INC. 

Filer’s Attestation: Pursuant to General 

Order No. 45, Section X(B) regarding signatures, 

Christopher L. Wanger hereby attests that concurrence in 

the filing of this document has been obtained 

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

Pursuant to the Stipulation above, the above-captioned matter is hereby referred to 

mediation. The deadline for such mediation is 45 days following the Court’s Order(s) on the 

Plaintiffs’ summary judgment motions. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: 

 HON. WILLIAM H. ALSUP 

 United States District Court Judge 

20160898.1 

Case 3:06-cv-02591-WHA Document 16 Filed 06/30/2006 Page 2 of 2

August 2, 2006

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge William Alsup

Case 3:06-cv-02591-WHA Document 22 Filed 08/02/06 Page 2 of 2