Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-04788/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-04788-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Razmig Hovaghimian
Defendant
Pixel Labs, Inc.
Defendant
Ripple
Plaintiff
Ripple Labs, Inc.
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 1 

JOINT MOTION TO DISMISS: CASE NO.: 3:16-CV-04788-JST 

LEGAL\28716854\1

Lawrence S. Gordon (Cal. Bar No. 302330)

(lgordon@cozen.com) 

James A. Gale (Fla Bar No. 371726) 

(jgale@cozen.com) 

Samuel A. Lewis (Fla Bar No. 55360) 

(slewis@cozen.com) 

Ashley G. Kessler (NY Bar No. 4834339) 

(akessler@cozen.com) 

COZEN O'CONNOR 

101 Montgomery Street, Suite 1400 

San Francisco, CA 94104 

Telephone: 415.644.0914 

Facsimile: 415.644.0978 

Attorneys for Plaintiff Ripple Labs, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

RIPPLE LABS, INC., D/B/A RIPPLE, 

A DELAWARE CORPORATION, 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

PIXEL LABS, INC., A DELAWARE 

CORPORATION, RAZMIG 

HOVAGHIMIAN, 

Defendants. 

Case No.: 3:16-CV-04788-JST

ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE WITH THE 

COURT’S RETAINING JURISDICTION TO ENFORCE THE SETTLEMENT AND 

COEXISTENCE AGREEMENT 

 THIS CAUSE came to be heard on the joint motion filed by Plaintiff, RIPPLE LABS, INC., 

and Defendants PIXEL LABS, INC. and RAZMIG HAVAGHIMAN, providing notice to the Court 

of a Settlement and Coexistence Agreement (“Agreement”), jointly moving the Court to dismiss this 

case with prejudice and to retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the Agreement. 

 Being fully advised in the premises, it is, 

Case 3:16-cv-04788-JST Document 31 Filed 11/28/16 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 2 

JOINT MOTION TO DISMISS: CASE NO.: 3:16-CV-04788-JST 

LEGAL\28716854\1

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 

1. The Court has received and accepts the parties’ Agreement, attached hereto as Exhibit 

“A.” 

2. Pursuant to the terms of the Agreement, the Court Dismisses with Prejudice this 

cause, but retains jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the Agreement. 

3. Each party shall bear its/his own attorney’s fees and costs, unless otherwise provided 

in the Agreement. 

__________________________________ 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

COPIES FURNISHED TO ALL COUNSEL 

Case 3:16-cv-04788-JST Document 31 Filed 11/28/16 Page 2 of 2