Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_24-cv-00423/USCOURTS-caed-2_24-cv-00423-11/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Ford Motor Company
Defendant
Kenneth Hunnel
Plaintiff
Leanne Hunnel
Plaintiff
Stephen Jackson
Plaintiff

Document Text:

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

CASE NO. 2:24-CV-00423-DJC-SCR 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Cody R. Padgett (SBN 275553) 

cody.padgett@capstonelawyers.com 

Laura E. Goolsby (SBN 321721) 

laura.goolsby@capstonelawyers.com 

Nathan N. Kiyam (SBN 317677) 

nate.kiyam@capstonelawyers.com 

CAPSTONE LAW APC 

1875 Century Park East, Suite 1000 

Los Angeles, California 90067 

Telephone: (310) 556-4811 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

STEPHEN JACKSON 

Amir Nassihi (SBN 235936) 

anassihi@shb.com 

SHOOK HARDY & BACON L.L.P. 

555 Mission Street, Suite 2300 

San Francisco, CA 94105 

Telephone: 415.544.1900 

Facsimile: 415.391.0281 

Attorneys for Defendant

FORD MOTOR COMPANY 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

STEPHEN JACKSON, KENNETH 

HUNNEL, LEANNE HUNNEL, Individually 

and on behalf of all others similarly situated, 

 Plaintiffs, 

v. 

FORD MOTOR COMPANY, 

 Defendant. 

 Case No.: 2:24-cv-00423-DJC-SCR 

JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER 

REGARDING MOTION TO DISMISS 

BRIEFING SCHEDULE 

 

 

Case 2:24-cv-00423-DJC-SCR Document 40 Filed 12/10/24 Page 1 of 5
 2 

STIPULATION AND ORDER 

CASE NO. 2:24-CV-00423-DJC-SCR 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Plaintiffs STEPHEN JACKSON, KENNETH HUNNEL AND LEANNE HUNNEL 

(“Plaintiffs”) and Defendant FORD MOTOR COMPANY (“Defendant” or “Ford”), collectively 

referred to as the “Parties,” by and through their respective counsel, have met and conferred regarding 

the briefing schedule on Defendant’s motion to dismiss Plaintiff’s First Amended Class Action 

Complaint (“FAC”), and subject to Court approval, hereby stipulate as follows: 

1. On February 7, 2024, Plaintiff filed the original complaint (Dkt. 1); and 

2. On April 18, 2024, the Court granted Defendant’s L.R. 28-day extension to respond to June 

3, 2024 (Dkt. 15); and

3. On May 24, 2024, and pursuant to the Parties’ Joint Status Report (Dkt. 16), the Court granted 

the Parties’ stipulation for Plaintiff to file an amended complaint on July 3, 2024 and for 

Defendant to respond on August 23, 2024 (Dkt. 19); and

4. On July 3, 2024, the FAC was filed (Dkt. 28) which added new plaintiffs; and

5. On September 13, 2024, Defendant filed a Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. 32); and 

6. On October 29, 2024, the Court permitted Defendant to withdraw its Motion to Dismiss 

without prejudice as to re-filing by November 25, 2024 while the Parties continued to meet 

and confer regarding their efforts to reach a resolution (Dkt. 36); and 

7. On November 25, 2024, Defendant filed the currently pending Motion to Dismiss and noticed 

it for hearing on March 20, 2025 (Dkt. 37); and 

8. Plaintiffs’ response to the pending Motion to Dismiss is currently due 45 days later, by 

January 9, 2024 and Defendant’s reply is due 25 days later, by February 3, 2024 (Dkts. 31, 

36); and 

9. In light of the intervening holidays at the end of December and preplanned travel of counsel, 

the Parties have conferred and have agreed that Plaintiffs shall have be permitted to file their 

response to the pending Motion to Dismiss on or before January 17, 2024, and that Defendant 

shall be permitted to file its reply on or before February 19, 2024. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED AND AGREED. 

Case 2:24-cv-00423-DJC-SCR Document 40 Filed 12/10/24 Page 2 of 5
 3 

STIPULATION AND ORDER 

CASE NO. 2:24-CV-00423-DJC-SCR 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Dated: December 09, 2024 CAPSTONE LAW APC 

/s/ Laura E. Goolsby 

 Cody R. Padgett 

 Laura E. Goolsby 

 Nathan N. Kiyam 

 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

Dated: December 09, 2024 SHOOK, HARDY & BACON L.L.P. 

/s/ Amir Nassihi (as authorized on 12/9/2024) 

AMIR NASSIHI 

Attorneys for Defendant 

FORD MOTOR COMPANY

 

Case 2:24-cv-00423-DJC-SCR Document 40 Filed 12/10/24 Page 3 of 5
 4 

STIPULATION AND ORDER 

CASE NO. 2:24-CV-00423-DJC-SCR 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ATTESTATION OF SIGNATURE 

Pursuant to Civil L.R. 131(e), the undersigned hereby attests that concurrence in the filing 

of this document has been obtained from all signatories hereto. 

Dated: December 09, 2024 

/s/Laura E. Goolsby 

 

Case 2:24-cv-00423-DJC-SCR Document 40 Filed 12/10/24 Page 4 of 5
 5 

STIPULATION AND ORDER 

CASE NO. 2:24-CV-00423-DJC-SCR 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

 The parties’ above-referenced stipulation is hereby GRANTED. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: December 9, 2024 /s/ Daniel J. Calabretta 

 THE HONORABLE DANIEL J. CALABRETTA 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 2:24-cv-00423-DJC-SCR Document 40 Filed 12/10/24 Page 5 of 5