Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_13-cv-02046/USCOURTS-caed-1_13-cv-02046-2/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Ramiro Cerda
Plaintiff
Alessia Giacobino
Defendant
Jacinto Romero
Plaintiff
Yo No Fui Clothing
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JACINTO ROMERO, an individual; and 

RAMIRO CERDA, an individual d/b/a Yo No 

Fui Clothing, 

Plaintiffs,

v.

ALESSIA GIACOBINO, and individual; and 

DOES 1-10, inclusive,

Defendants.

_____________________________________/

Case No. 1:13-cv-02046-AWI-SKO

ORDER RESCHEDULING HEARING TO 

DETERMINE DAMAGES

(Doc. 20)

Plaintiffs Jacinto Romero and Ramiro Cerda (“Plaintiffs”) filed a Complaint on December 

16, 2013, for trademark infringement, unfair competition, and false designation of origin. 

(Doc. 1.) Defendant Alessia Giacobino was served on March 26, 2014, with an answer to the 

complaint due April 16, 2014. (Doc. 5.) The clerk entered default against Defendant on August 

29, 2014, and Plaintiffs filed their Motion for Default Judgment on November 13, 2014. 

(Docs. 11, 15.) 

Plaintiffs requested a hearing pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 55(b)(2), which was set for 

January 14, 2015. (Doc. 16; 17.) As Defendant resides in Italy, Plaintiffs were unable to serve 

him with notice of the hearing and Plaintiffs requested the hearing be rescheduled to allow them 

sufficient time to effect service. (Doc. 18.) The hearing was vacated and reset to June 17, 2015, a 

Case 1:13-cv-02046-DAD-SKO Document 21 Filed 04/01/15 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

five-month extension of time. (Doc. 19.)

Plaintiffs have still not effected service upon the Defendant. (Doc. 20, 1.) Plaintiffs have 

“initiated service and the documents are currently being translated” but Plaintiffs’ “service of 

process provider has informed [P]laintiffs they will require additional time to fulfill international 

regulations.” (Doc. 20, 1.) Plaintiffs request a rescheduling of the hearing to determine damages, 

to allow for proper foreign service of notice of the hearing and the documentation supporting their 

request for damages. (Doc. 20, 1.)

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The hearing to determine damages set for June 17, 2015, is VACATED, and the 

hearing is RESET to August 12, 2015, at 9:30 a.m. in Courtroom 7; 

2. Plaintiffs shall FILE proofs of service of the Court’s order and notice of the reset 

hearing on Defendant by no later than May 27, 2015. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 31, 2015 /s/ Sheila K. Oberto 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:13-cv-02046-DAD-SKO Document 21 Filed 04/01/15 Page 2 of 2