Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-03014/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-03014-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Liudmyla Iegorova
Plaintiff
Target Corporation
Defendant

Document Text:

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

LIUDMYLA IEGOROVA, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

TARGET CORPORATION, 

Defendant. 

No. 2:14-cv-3014-MCE-KJN PS 

ORDER 

 Presently pending before the court is defendant’s motion to dismiss, which is currently set 

for hearing on May 7, 2015. (ECF No. 7.) Pursuant to Local Rule 230(c), plaintiff was required 

to file an opposition or statement of non-opposition to the motion no later than fourteen (14) days 

prior to the hearing date, i.e., by April 23, 2015. However, the court’s records indicate that 

plaintiff failed to file an opposition or statement of non-opposition to the motion in accordance 

with Local Rule 230(c). 

 In light of plaintiff’s pro se status and the court’s desire to resolve defendant’s motion on 

the merits, the court finds it appropriate to continue the hearing on the motion and provide 

plaintiff with one additional opportunity to oppose the motion. 

//// 

//// 

Case 2:14-cv-03014-MCE-KJN Document 8 Filed 04/24/15 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2

 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 

1. The May 7, 2015 hearing on defendant’s motion to dismiss is VACATED and 

CONTINUED to June 18, 2015, at 10:00 a.m., in Courtroom No. 25 before the 

undersigned. 

2. Plaintiff shall file any opposition to the motion to dismiss no later than May 21, 2015. 

In the alternative, if plaintiff no longer wishes to pursue the case at this time, she may 

instead file a notice of voluntary dismissal of the action without prejudice no later than 

May 21, 2015. 

3. Defendant shall file any reply to plaintiff’s opposition, if any, no later than June 4, 

2015. 

4. Failure to file either an opposition or a request for voluntary dismissal by the required 

deadline will result in a recommendation that the action be dismissed with prejudice 

pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). 

5. In light of the pending motion to dismiss, the May 28, 2015 status (pretrial scheduling) 

conference is VACATED. The court will reset the date of that conference at a later 

juncture, if appropriate. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: April 24, 2015 

Case 2:14-cv-03014-MCE-KJN Document 8 Filed 04/24/15 Page 2 of 2