Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_19-cv-01665/USCOURTS-caed-2_19-cv-01665-3/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Arleen Murphy
Plaintiff
David Nelson
Defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ARLEEN MURPHY,

Plaintiff,

v.

DAVID NELSON,

Defendant.

No. 2:19-cv-1665 WBS DB P

ORDER

Plaintiff, a county inmate proceeding pro se, has filed a civil rights action pursuant to 42 

U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 

§ 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On March 10, 2020, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 

which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the 

findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 7.) Plaintiff has 

not filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

Although it appears from the file that plaintiff’s copy of the findings and 

recommendations was returned, plaintiff was properly served. It is the plaintiff’s responsibility to 

keep the court apprised of his current address at all times. Pursuant to Local Rule 182(f), service 

of documents at the record address of the party is fully effective.

Case 2:19-cv-01665-WBS-DB Document 8 Filed 05/06/20 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 

supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 

ORDERED that: 

1. The findings and recommendations filed March 10, 2020, are adopted in full; and

2. This action is dismissed without prejudice.

Dated: May 6, 2020

 

murp1665.800

Case 2:19-cv-01665-WBS-DB Document 8 Filed 05/06/20 Page 2 of 2