Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca13-14-01421/USCOURTS-ca13-14-01421-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Guzik Technical Enterprises, Inc.
Appellant
Western Digital (Fremont) Inc
Appellee
Western Digital (Malaysia) SDN.BHD.
Appellee
Western Digital (Thailand) Company Limited
Appellee
Western Digital Corporation
Appellee
Western Digital Technologies, Inc.
Appellee

Document Text:

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

GUZIK TECHNICAL ENTERPRISES, INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

WESTERN DIGITAL CORPORATION, WESTERN 

DIGITAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC., WESTERN 

DIGITAL (FREMONT) INC., WESTERN DIGITAL 

(THAILAND) COMPANY LIMITED, AND WESTERN 

DIGITAL (MALAYSIA) SDN.BHD.,

Defendants-Appellees.

______________________ 

2014-1421

______________________ 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the 

Northern District of California in No. 5:11-cv-03786-PSG, 

Magistrate Judge Paul S. Grewal.

______________________ 

JUDGMENT

______________________ 

A. MARISA CHUN, McDermott, Will & Emery, LLP, of 

Menlo Park, California, argued for plaintiff-appellant. 

With her on the brief were DANIEL E. ALBERTI and ERIC 

W. HAGEN. Of counsel were M. MILLER BAKER, of Washington, DC, and NATALIE A. BENNETT, of Chicago, Illinois. 

Case: 14-1421 Document: 78-2 Page: 1 Filed: 01/09/2015
 

 DOUGLAS E. LUMISH, Latham & Watkins, LLP, of 

Menlo Park, California argued for defendants-appellees. 

With him on the brief were RICHARD G. FRENKEL and

MICHELLE P. WOODHOUSE; and JAMES L. DAY, of San 

Francisco, CA.

______________________ 

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 

 PER CURIAM (O’MALLEY, BRYSON, and HUGHES, Circuit 

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

 January 9, 2015 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole

 Date Daniel E. O’Toole 

 Clerk of Court

Case: 14-1421 Document: 78-2 Page: 2 Filed: 01/09/2015