Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-00497/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-00497-2/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Richard Acosta
Plaintiff
Pam Ahlin
Defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RICHARD ACOSTA,

Plaintiff,

v.

PAM AHLIN,

Defendant.

No. 2:15-CV-0497 WBS DAD P

ORDER

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a Notice of Withdrawal in which he 

requests that his action be dismissed without prejudice. (ECF No. 6.) The court construes 

plaintiff’s notice as a voluntary dismissal pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure

41(a)(1)(A)(i), under which plaintiff’s request is self-executing. That is, plaintiff dismissed this 

action without prejudice when he filed his notice, and no additional order of dismissal from this 

court is required. See Concha v. London, 62 F.3d 1493, 1506 (9th Cir.1995); Lee v. Pass, No. 

2:10-cv-2220 TLN DAD P, 2013 WL 3872555 at *3 (E.D. Cal. July 25, 2013). However, the 

court will order that this case be closed. 

/////

/////

/////

/////

Case 2:15-cv-00497-WBS-DAD Document 7 Filed 07/20/15 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that in light of plaintiff’s voluntary dismissal of 

this action in his notice of withdrawal (ECF No. 6), this action is closed. 

Dated: July 17, 2015

hm/acos0497.59

Case 2:15-cv-00497-WBS-DAD Document 7 Filed 07/20/15 Page 2 of 2