Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca11-14-12252/USCOURTS-ca11-14-12252-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Lee Anthony Guidry
Appellant
United States of America
Appellee

Document Text:

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 14-12252

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D.C. Docket No. 1:13-cr-00039-WS-B-4

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

LEE ANTHONY GUIDRY, 

 Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Alabama

________________________

(March 20, 2015)

Before JORDAN, ROSENBAUM, and JULIE CARNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: 

Robert Ratliff, appointed counsel for Lee Anthony Guidry in this direct

criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of Guidry and 

USCA11 Case: 14-12252 Date Filed: 03/20/2015 Page: 1 of 2
2

filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396 (1967). 

Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of 

the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the 

entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is 

GRANTED, and Guidry’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

USCA11 Case: 14-12252 Date Filed: 03/20/2015 Page: 2 of 2