Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-10-01266/USCOURTS-ca4-10-01266-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Arthur McFarland
Appellee
Christopher A. Odom
Appellant
Stephen Ryan
Appellee

Document Text:

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-1266

CHRISTOPHER A. ODOM,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

STEPHEN RYAN; JUDGE ARTHUR MCFARLAND,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Columbia. Patrick Michael Duffy, Senior

District Judge. (3:09-cv-03271-PMD)

Submitted: July 22, 2010 Decided: July 29, 2010

Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Christopher A. Odom, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 10-1266 Doc: 7 Filed: 07/29/2010 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Christopher A. Odom appeals the district court’s order 

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying 

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have 

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, 

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Odom v. 

Ryan, No. 3:09-cv-03271-PMD (D.S.C. Feb. 4, 2010). We dispense 

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before the court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Appeal: 10-1266 Doc: 7 Filed: 07/29/2010 Pg: 2 of 2