Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_10-cv-00251/USCOURTS-caed-1_10-cv-00251-2/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Derral Adams
Respondent
Robert Gonzales Galvan
Petitioner

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ROBERT GONZALES GALVAN,

Petitioner,

v.

DERRAL ADAMS,

Respondent.

 /

1:10-cv-00251-LJO-DLB (HC)

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATION, DISMISSING CLAIM

TWO FROM PETITION, AND REFERRING

MATTER BACK TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE

FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS

[Doc. 6]

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. 

On March 17, 2010, the Magistrate Judge issued Findings and Recommendation to

dismissing Claim One from the Petition for failure to state a cognizable claim. This Findings and

Recommendation was served on all parties and contained notice that any objections were to be

filed within thirty (30) days of the date of service of the order. 

On March 25, 2010, Petitioner filed timely objections to the Findings and

Recommendation. (Court Doc. 7.) 

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted

a de novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, including Petitioner's

objections, the Court concludes that the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation is

supported by the record and proper analysis. Petitioner's objections present no grounds for

questioning the Magistrate Judge's analysis.

1

Case 1:10-cv-00251-LJO-DLB Document 8 Filed 04/15/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendation issued March 17, 2010, is ADOPTED IN

FULL;

2. Claim Two of the instant Petition is DISMISSED for failure to state a cognizable

claim; and

3. The matter is referred back to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 14, 2010 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill 

b9ed48 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2

Case 1:10-cv-00251-LJO-DLB Document 8 Filed 04/15/10 Page 2 of 2