Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_22-cv-01568/USCOURTS-caed-1_22-cv-01568-5/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Tristan Lemon
Respondent
Victor Manuel Quintero
Petitioner

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

VICTOR MANUEL QUINTERO,

Petitioner,

v.

TRISTAN LEMON,

Respondent.

Case No. 1:22-cv-01568-JLT-SAB-HC

ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF

TIME TO FILE OBJECTIONS TO 

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in a habeas corpus action pursuant to 28 

U.S.C. § 2254.

On October 7, 2024, the Court issued findings and recommendation to deny the petition. 

(ECF No. 25.) The findings and recommendation was served on Petitioner and contained notice 

that any objections were to be filed within thirty (30) days of the date of service of the findings 

and recommendation. Instead of filing objections, Petitioner filed a notice of appeal on October 

28, 2024. (ECF No. 26.) On November 25, 2024, the appeal was dismissed for lack of 

jurisdiction, and the mandate issued on December 17, 2024. (ECF Nos. 29, 30.)

In the interest of justice, the Court will grant additional time to file objections to the 

findings and recommendation. Within THIRTY (30) days after service of this order, any party 

may file written objections with the Court, limited to fifteen (15) pages in length, including 

any exhibits. Such a document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings 

Case 1:22-cv-01568-JLT-SAB Document 31 Filed 12/18/24 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

and Recommendation.” Replies to the objections shall be served and filed within fourteen (14) 

days after service of the objections. The assigned District Judge will then review the Magistrate 

Judge’s ruling pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). The parties are advised that failure to file 

objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. 

Wilkerson v. Wheeler, 772 F.3d 834, 839 (9th Cir. 2014) (citing Baxter v. Sullivan, 923 F.2d 

1391, 1394 (9th Cir. 1991)).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: December 18, 2024 

STANLEY A. BOONE

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 1:22-cv-01568-JLT-SAB Document 31 Filed 12/18/24 Page 2 of 2