Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca10-09-04206/USCOURTS-ca10-09-04206-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Armando Bermudez-Torres
Appellant
United States of America
Appellee

Document Text:

* This panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not

materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2);

10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral

argument. This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the

doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. It may be cited,

however, for its persuasive value consistent with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 and

10th Cir. R. 32.1.

FILED

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

March 3, 2010

Elisabeth A. Shumaker

Clerk of Court

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

ARMANDO BERMUDEZ-TORRES,

Defendant-Appellant.

No. 09-4206

(D.C. No. 2:09-CR-00423-CW-1)

(D. Utah)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

Before TACHA, MURPHY, and TYMKOVICH, Circuit Judges.

This matter is before the court on the government’s motion to enforce the

appeal waiver contained in defendant’s plea agreement. The motion is filed

pursuant to United States v. Hahn, 359 F.3d 1315 (10th Cir. 2004) (en banc)

(per curiam). In response, defendant concedes that the government’s motion is

well taken, and that the appeal should be dismissed, because the appeal falls

Appellate Case: 09-4206 Document: 01018377043 Date Filed: 03/03/2010 Page: 1
-2-

within the scope of the appeal waiver, defendant knowingly and voluntarily

waived his appellate rights, and enforcing the waiver would not result in a

miscarriage of justice. See id. at 1325. 

Accordingly, the government’s motion is GRANTED, and the appeal is

DISMISSED.

ENTERED FOR THE COURT

PER CURIAM

Appellate Case: 09-4206 Document: 01018377043 Date Filed: 03/03/2010 Page: 2