Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca5-03-41765/USCOURTS-ca5-03-41765-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Michael Anthony Castro
Appellant
R. D. Miles
Appellee

Document Text:

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

April 21, 2004

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 03-41765

Conference Calendar

 

MICHAEL ANTHONY CASTRO,

Petitioner-Appellant,

versus

R. D. MILES, Warden,

Respondent-Appellee.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:03-CV-242 

--------------------

Before JOLLY, JONES, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Michael Anthony Castro, federal prisoner # 65029-080, filed

a 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition challenging the sentence he received

as a result of his 1993 conviction for being a felon in

possession of a firearm. The district court dismissed the

petition and Castro timely appealed. Castro argues that his

prior convictions were improperly used to enhance his sentence

under the Armed Career Criminal Act and that he received

ineffective assistance of counsel at sentencing. Castro has

 Case: 03-41765 Document: 0051358212 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/21/2004
No. 03-41765

-2-

failed to identify a retroactively applicable Supreme Court

decision which establishes that he may have been convicted of a

nonexistent offense. His claim, therefore, does not satisfy the

savings clause of 28 U.S.C. § 2255, and he is not entitled to

utilize 28 U.S.C. § 2241. See Reyes-Requena v. United States,

243 F.3d 893, 903-04 (5th Cir. 2001). 

This appeal is without arguable merit and, therefore, it is

DISMISSED as frivolous. See Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 219-20

(5th Cir. 1983); 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. Additionally, Castro’s

petition is repetitious. Castro has previously filed a 28 U.S.C.

§ 2241 petition challenging this same conviction and raising

identical claims. Castro v. Chandler, No. 01-40915 (5th Cir.

Dec. 28, 2001) (unpublished) (affirming dismissal of 28 U.S.C.

§ 2241 petition). Castro is warned that any future frivolous

pleadings under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 challenging this conviction will

invite the imposition of sanctions

APPEAL DISMISSED; SANCTION WARNING ISSUED. 

 Case: 03-41765 Document: 0051358212 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/21/2004