Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-07-01257/USCOURTS-ca4-07-01257-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Jonathan W. Dudas
Appellee
S. K. Varma
Appellant

Document Text:

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-1257

S. K. VARMA,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

JONATHAN W. DUDAS, Director, United States

Patent and Trademark Office,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior

District Judge. (1:06-cv-00421-JCC)

Submitted: November 20, 2007 Decided: November 28, 2007

Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

S. K. Varma, Appellant Pro Se. Jonathan Holland Hambrick, OFFICE

OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellant.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 07-1257 Doc: 25 Filed: 11/28/2007 Pg: 1 of 2
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

S. K. Varma appeals the district court’s order granting

Defendant’s summary judgment motion on her age discrimination claim

under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, as amended,

29 U.S.C. §§ 621 to 634 (2000), and her retaliation claim under

Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C.

§§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (2000), and affirming the Merit Systems

Protection Board’s decision affirming her removal from employment.

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. See Varma v. Dudas, No. 1:06-cv-00421-JCC (E.D. Va. Jan.

24, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Appeal: 07-1257 Doc: 25 Filed: 11/28/2007 Pg: 2 of 2