Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-05457/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-05457-15/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Allan D. Grushkin
Plaintiff
Security National Properties Holding Company, LLC
Defendant

Document Text:

-1-

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO CONTINUE HEARING DATE FOR THE MOTION TO VACATE JUDGMENT AND TO DISMISS THE 

CASE FOR LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION 

3:13-cv-05457-MMC

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Ryan Thomas (SBN 230491) 

Roy N. Johnston (SBN 185409) 

JOHNSTON | THOMAS, Attorneys at Law

1400 N. Dutton Avenue, Suite 21

Santa Rosa, CA 95401 

Telephone: (707) 545-6542

Facsimile: (707) 545-1522 

Philip W. Boesch, Jr. (SBN 60608)

Benjamin C. Johnson (SBN 218518)

THE BOESCH LAW GROUP

225 Santa Monica Boulevard, 11th Floor

Santa Monica, CA 90401

Telephone: (310) 578-7880

Facsimile: (310) 578-7898

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ALLAN D. GRUSHKIN, 

Plaintiff, 

v.

SECURITY NATIONAL PROPERTIES 

HOLDING COMPANY, LLC, and Does 1-100, 

inclusive, 

Defendants.

CASE NO.: 3:13-cv-05457-MMC

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER 

TO CONTINUE HEARING DATE FOR 

THE MOTION TO VACATE JUDGMENT 

AND TO DISMISS THE CASE FOR LACK 

OF SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION

Date Action Filed: November 25, 2013

Hearing Date: November 20, 2015

Time: 9:00 a.m.

Dept.: 7

Plaintiff ALLAN D. GRUSHKIN (“Plaintiff”), on the one hand, and Defendant SECURITY 

NATIONAL PROPERTIES HOLDING COMPANY, LLC (“Defendant”) (collectively, the 

“Parties”), on the other hand, through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate and agree as 

follows:

On May, 28, 2015, upon stipulation of the Parties, the Court entered judgment in favor of 

Plaintiff against Defendant in the sum of $1,737,420 (“Judgment”);

The Court issued its corrected Judgment on July 17, 2015; 

WHEREAS, on October 2, 2015, Defendant filed a Motion to Vacate Judgment and to 

Dismiss the Case for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction (“Motion”);

Case 3:13-cv-05457-MMC Document 58 Filed 10/13/15 Page 1 of 3
-2-

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO CONTINUE HEARING DATE FOR THE MOTION TO VACATE JUDGMENT AND TO DISMISS THE 

CASE FOR LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION 

3:13-cv-05457-MMC

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WHEREAS, the Motion is presently set for hearing on November 20, 2015. Plaintiff’s 

opposition to the Motion is presently due on October 16, 2015, and Defendant’s Reply is due 

October 23, 2015; 

WHEREAS, due to Plaintiff’s counsel’s pre-planned family vacation from October 15 

through 23, 2015; and a trial set in the Sonoma County Superior Court of California beginning on 

November 20, 2015; 

WHEREAS, Plaintiff and Defendant met and conferred regarding the date of the hearing for 

the Motion, and the briefing scheduled leading up to it; 

NOW, THEREFORE, Plaintiff and Defendant have stipulated and agreed as follows to the 

hearing date on the Motion and the briefing schedule leading up to it:

STIPULATION

1. The hearing date on the Motion shall be continued to December 4, 2015, or the first 

available date thereafter, as the Court’s schedule will allow;

2. Plaintiff’s Opposition to the Motion shall be due October 30, 2015;

3. Defendant’s Reply shall be due November 6, 2015; and

4. ____________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________

_______________________________________________________________________________.

DATED: October 9, 2015 By: ____/s/ Ryan F. Thomas

RYAN F. THOMAS

JOHNSTON THOMAS, Attorneys at law

Attorneys for Plaintiff

ALLAN D. GRUSHKIN

DATED: October 9, 2015 By: /s/ Benjamin C. Johnson

BENJAMIN C. JOHNSON

THE BOESCH LAW GROUP

Attorneys for Defendant

SECURITY NATIONAL PROPERTIES HOLDING 

COMPANY, LLC

Filer’s Attestation: Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1 (i)(3) regarding signatures, Ryan F. 

Thomas hereby attests that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained

Case 3:13-cv-05457-MMC Document 58 Filed 10/13/15 Page 2 of 3
-3-

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO CONTINUE HEARING DATE FOR THE MOTION TO VACATE JUDGMENT AND TO DISMISS THE 

CASE FOR LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION 

3:13-cv-05457-MMC

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

The parties’ Joint Stipulation to Continue the Hearing Date for the Motion to Vacate 

Judgment and to Dismiss the Case for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction is approved and the 

hearing is set for _______________________________________________________________

_____________________________________________________________________________

_____________________________________________________________________________

_____________________________________________________________________________.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED:_______________ _______________________________________

MAXINE M. CHESNEY

United States District Judge 

December 4, 2015, at 9:00 a.m. Oct. 13, 2015

Case 3:13-cv-05457-MMC Document 58 Filed 10/13/15 Page 3 of 3