Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-05921/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-05921-4/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
James Edward Cooper
Petitioner
Chuck Harrison
Respondent

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JAMES EDWARD COOPER, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

v. )

)

)

CHUCK HARRISON, WARDEN, )

)

Respondent. )

)

___________________________________ )

CV F 04-5921 OWW WMW HC

ORDER ADOPTING

FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS RE

DISMISSAL OF PETITION

FOR WRIT OF HABEAS

CORPUS

[Doc. 9,16, 19]

Petitioner, a state prisoner, has filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 2254 . The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72-302. 

On February 16, 2006, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations

herein. These findings and recommendations were served on the parties and contained notice

to the parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within

thirty days. On April 3, 2006, Petitioner filed a statement that he conceded all previous

defenses.

Case 1:04-cv-05921-OWW -WMW Document 20 Filed 05/03/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 2

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)C) this court has

conducted a de novo review of this case. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708

F.2d 452, 454 (9 Cir. 1983). Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the th

findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis. 

Based on the foregoing, it is HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations issued by the Magistrate Judge on 

February 16, 2006, are a adopted in full;

2. The motion to dismiss is GRANTED;

3. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DISMISSED;

3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment for Respondent and to close this

case. IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 2, 2006 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger 

emm0d6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:04-cv-05921-OWW -WMW Document 20 Filed 05/03/06 Page 2 of 2