Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_12-cv-03527/USCOURTS-cand-3_12-cv-03527-8/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Austiag Parineh
Defendant
Hormoz Parineh
Defendant
Khashayar Parineh
Defendant
Pooroushasb Parineh
Defendant
Pruco Life Insurance Company
Plaintiff

Document Text:

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

PRUCO LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY,

Plaintiff,

 v.

POOROUSHASB PARINEH, individually,

AUSTIAG PARINEH, individually and as

co-trustee of the Parineh Family

Irrevocable Trust dated June 24, 1996

(“PFIT”), HORMOZ PARINEH,

individually and as co-trustee of the PFIT,

and KHASHAYAR PARINEH,

individually and as co-trustee of the PFIT,

Defendants. /

No. C 12-03527 WHA

ORDER DENYING

POOROUSHASB PARINEH’S

SECOND MOTION FOR

RECONSIDERATION

In this interpleader action, an order granted summary judgment for the co-contingent

beneficiaries on a life insurance policy, Austiag Parineh, Hormoz Parineh, and Khashayar

Parineh, and against the primary beneficiary, Pooroushasb Parineh, on the basis that

Pooroushasb had been convicted of the murder of the decedent. An order denied Pooroushasb’s

“Motion to Suppress the Summary Judgement [sic],” which was construed as a motion for

reconsideration (Dkt. No. 61). Pooroushasb has now made a motion for reconsideration. This

motion again reiterates Pooroushasb’s denials of his guilt, but he does not deny that his

conviction is final or that his conviction precludes his recovery under Sections 252 and 254(a)

of the California Probate Code. Nor does he offer any grounds for reconsidering the order

granting summary judgment. 

Case 3:12-cv-03527-WHA Document 63 Filed 10/04/16 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Pooroushasb’s second motion for reconsideration is DENIED. Pooroushasb’s next step,

if he chooses to pursue this case, will be to appeal to our court of appeals.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 4, 2016. 

WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:12-cv-03527-WHA Document 63 Filed 10/04/16 Page 2 of 2