Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-01504/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-01504-5/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Mike C. Kramer
Respondent
Johnney Ramey
Petitioner

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOHNNEY RAMEY, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

vs. )

)

)

MIKE C. KRAMER, Warden, )

)

Respondent. )

)

)

___________________________________ )

1:05-cv-01504-LJO WMW HC

ORDER ADOPTING

FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS RE

MOTION TO DISMISS

PETITION FOR WRIT OF

HABEAS CORPUS

[Doc. 9, 16, 17]

Petitioner is a prisoner proceeding with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant

to 28 U.S.C. Section 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72-302.

On January 15, 2008, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations

herein. These findings and recommendations were served on the parties and contained notice

to the parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within

thirty days. Petitioner filed objections on January 28, 2008. 

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)C) this court has

Case 1:05-cv-01504-OWW -WMW Document 19 Filed 02/12/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 2

conducted a de novo review of this case. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708

F.2d 452, 454 (9 Cir. 1983). Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the th

findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis. 

Based on the foregoing, it is HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations issued by the Magistrate Judge on 

January 15, 2008, are a adopted in full;

2. Respondent’s motion to dismiss is GRANTED;

2. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DISMISSED as an unauthorized second or

successive petition;

3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment for Respondent and to close this

case. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 11, 2008 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill 

b9ed48 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:05-cv-01504-OWW -WMW Document 19 Filed 02/12/08 Page 2 of 2