Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_14-cv-01176/USCOURTS-caed-1_14-cv-01176-2/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Commissioner of Social Security
Defendant
Alicia Ramirez
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ALICIA RAMIREZ,

Plaintiff,

v.

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL 

SECURITY,

Defendant.

Case No. 1:14-cv-1176-SAB

ORDER REQUIRING DEFENDANT TO 

SHOW CAUSE WHY PLAINTIFF’S SOCIAL 

SECURITY APPEAL SHOULD NOT BE 

DEEMED UNOPPOSED

TEN-DAY DEADLINE

On March 26, 2015, an order issued granting the parties stipulation to extend time for 

briefing. Pursuant to the stipulation, Plaintiff’s opening brief was due on May 19, 2015; 

Defendant’s opposition brief was due on June 18, 2015; and Plaintiff’s reply was due July 6, 

2015. (ECF No. 12.) Plaintiff filed her opening brief on May 20, 2015. (ECF No. 13.) 

Although the stipulated date has passed, Defendant has not filed an opposition brief. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, within ten (10) days from the date of 

service of this order, Defendant shall either file a written response to this order to show cause 

why Plaintiff’s opening brief should not be deemed unopposed or file an opposition to Plaintiff’s 

opening brief. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 1, 2015 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:14-cv-01176-SAB Document 14 Filed 07/01/15 Page 1 of 1