Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-16-06507/USCOURTS-ca4-16-06507-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Antonio Owens
Appellant
United States of America
Appellee

Document Text:

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-6507

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

ANTONIO OWENS, a/k/a Tonio,

 Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Columbia. Cameron McGowan Currie, Senior

District Judge. (3:02-cr-00548-CMC-26)

Submitted: June 23, 2016 Decided: June 29, 2016

Before MOTZ, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Antonio Owens, Appellant Pro Se. Beth Drake, John C. 

Potterfield, Jane Barrett Taylor, Assistant United States 

Attorneys, Columbia, South Carolina; Carrie Fisher Sherard, 

Leesa Washington, Assistant United States Attorneys, Greenville, 

South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 16-6507 Doc: 5 Filed: 06/29/2016 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Antonio Owens appeals the district court’s order denying 

what it properly construed as a motion for reconsideration of 

the district court’s previous order denying Owens’ 18 U.S.C. 

§ 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for sentence reduction based on 

Amendment 782 to the Sentencing Guidelines. The district court 

had only one opportunity to apply Amendment 782 and modify 

Owens’ sentence. See United States v. Goodwyn, 596 F.3d 233, 

235-36 (4th Cir. 2010). Accordingly, we affirm the district 

court’s order. See United States v. Owens, No. 3:02-cr-00548-

CMC-26 (D.S.C. Mar. 28, 2016). We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented 

in the materials before this court and argument would not aid in 

the decisional process. 

AFFIRMED

Appeal: 16-6507 Doc: 5 Filed: 06/29/2016 Pg: 2 of 2