Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_16-cv-04074/USCOURTS-cand-4_16-cv-04074-2/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Ally Financial Inc.
Cross-defendant
Weerachai Chaiwong
Plaintiff
Hanlees Fremont Hyundai
Defendant
Hanlees Fremont, Inc.
Cross-claimant

Document Text:

-1-

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER Extending Time for Hanlees Fremont, Inc. to Respond to Ally 

Financial, Inc.’s Notice of Motion and Motion to Dismiss Cross-Claims, and to Extend Time for Ally’s Reply 

Thereto3:16-cv-04074-HSG 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

MARTIN S. PUTNAM, SBN: 160951

LAW OFFICES OF MARTIN PUTNAM

1300 Clay Street, Suite 600

Oakland, CA 94612

Tel: (510) 466-6300

Fax: (510) 225-2625

martin@putnamlaw.com

Attorneys for Defendant and Cross-Complainant

Hanlees Fremont, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO COURTHOUSE

Weerachai Chaiwong, an individual,

Plaintiff,

v.

Hanlees Fremont, Inc., a California corporation,

dba Hanlees Fremont Hyundai;

Ally Financial, Inc., a Delaware corporation; and

Does 1 through 75, inclusive,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 3:16-cv-04074-HSG

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER 

Extending Time for Hanlees Fremont, Inc. to 

Respond to Ally Financial, Inc.’s Notice of 

Motion and Motion to Dismiss 

Cross-Claims, and to Extend Time for 

Ally’s Reply Thereto

[Civil L.R. 6-1(b), 6-2, 7-12]

Hearing Date: January 26, 2017

Time: 2:00 p.m.

Judge: Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr.

Courtroom: 10

Action Filed: May 25, 2016

Removed: July 20, 2016

Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 6-1(b), 6-2, and 7-12, Defendant Hanlees Fremont, 

Inc. (“Hanlees”) and Defendant Ally Financial Inc. (“Ally”) (together, "the affected 

parties”) by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate as follows:

Case 4:16-cv-04074-HSG Document 42 Filed 12/07/16 Page 1 of 3
-2-

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER Extending Time for Hanlees Fremont, Inc. to Respond to Ally 

Financial, Inc.’s Notice of Motion and Motion to Dismiss Cross-Claims, and to Extend Time for Ally’s Reply 

Thereto3:16-cv-04074-HSG 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER

WHEREAS, Defendant Ally Financial filed a Notice of Motion and Motion to 

Dismiss the Cross-Claims of Defendant Hanlees Fremont, Inc. (“Motion to Dismiss”) on 

November 7, 2016; 

WHEREAS, Hanlees’ response to the Motion to Dismiss is presently due for filing 

and service on a stipulated extended date of December 5, 2016, and Ally’s reply to 

Hanlees’ response is presently due on a stipulated extended date of December 19, 2016;

WHEREAS, Ally has agreed to extend Hanlees’ time to respond to the Motion to 

Dismiss by an additional fourteen (14) days, until December 19, 2016, to allow Hanlees

sufficient time to respond in view of medical restrictions on activities of co-counsel Louis 

Liberty, on advice of neurologist Josiah Bartlett Ambrose, M.D. [Civil L.R. 6-2(a)(1)];

WHEREAS, Hanlees has agreed to extend Ally’s time to reply to Hanlees’ 

response to the Motion to Dismiss by an additional sixteen (16) days after the stipulated 

new due date for Hanlees’ response, until January 7, 2017, to allow Ally sufficient time 

to reply to Hanlees’ response to the Motion to Dismiss in view of Ally’s counsel’s trial 

schedule and the intervening holidays [Civil L.R. 6-2(a)(1)];

WHEREAS, one previous two-week extension of time for Hanless to respond to 

the Motion to Dismiss, and a corresponding extension of time for Ally to reply, were

stipulated by the affected parties and filed in this docket on November 21, 2016 [Civil 

L.R. 6-2(a)(2)];

WHEREAS, the requested extensions will not have any effect on the current 

schedule for the case [Civil L.R. 6-2(a)(3)];

WHEREAS, a Court order is required for the requested extensions, in that they

involve papers required to be filed with the Court [Civil L.R. 6-1(b)];

Case 4:16-cv-04074-HSG Document 42 Filed 12/07/16 Page 2 of 3
-3-

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER Extending Time for Hanlees Fremont, Inc. to Respond to Ally 

Financial, Inc.’s Notice of Motion and Motion to Dismiss Cross-Claims, and to Extend Time for Ally’s Reply 

Thereto3:16-cv-04074-HSG 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED TO, by and between the Parties herein, through 

their respective attorneys of record, AND THE COURT IS REQUESTED TO ORDER, 

that Hanlees shall have an additional fourteen (14) day extension, up to and including 

December 19, 2016, in which to file and serve a response to Ally’s Motion to Dismiss; 

and Ally shall have (16) days thereafter, up to and including January 7, 2017, in which to 

file and serve a reply to Hanlees’ response.

This Stipulation is made without prejudice to, or waiver of, any rights or defenses 

otherwise available to the Parties in this action. 

DATED: December 5, 2016 SEVERSON & WERSON

A Professional Corporation

By: /s/ Erik Kemp

Erik Kemp

Attorneys for Defendant ALLY FINANCIAL INC.

Dated: December 5, 2016

 LAW OFFICES OF MARTIN PUTNAM

 By: /s/ Martin S. Putnam _____

 Martin S. Putnam

Attorneys for Defendant and Cross-Complainant 

HANLEES FREMONT, INC.

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: December __, 2016 By: __________________________________

Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr.

7

Case 4:16-cv-04074-HSG Document 42 Filed 12/07/16 Page 3 of 3