Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-01448/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-01448-4/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Kathy Mendoza-Powers
Respondent
Gregory Erik Moore
Petitioner

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

U.S. District Court

 E. D. California cd 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GREGORY ERIK MOORE, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

)

v. )

)

)

KATHY MENDOZA-POWERS, )

)

Respondent. )

 )

1:05-CV-1448 AWI NEW (DLB) HC 

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND 

RECOMMENDATION 

[Doc. #16]

ORDER DISMISSING PETITION FOR WRIT

OF HABEAS CORPUS

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT

TO ENTER JUDGMENT 

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. 

On May 29, 2007, the Magistrate Judge issued a Findings and Recommendation that

recommended the petition for writ of habeas corpus be DISMISSED for failure to prosecute. This

Findings and Recommendation was served on all parties and contained notice that any objections to

the Findings and Recommendation were to be filed within thirty (30) days of the date of service of

the order. Over thirty (30) days have passed and no party has filed objections. Of note, the Findings

and Recommendation was returned by the U.S. Postal Service as undeliverable.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a de

Case 1:05-cv-01448-AWI-LJO Document 18 Filed 09/20/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

U.S. District Court

 E. D. California cd 2

novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds that the Findings

and Recommendation is supported by the record and proper analysis. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendation issued May 29, 2007, is ADOPTED IN FULL; 

2. The petition for writ of habeas corpus is DISMISSED; 

3. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to enter judgment.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 20, 2007 /s/ Anthony W. Ishii 

0m8i78 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:05-cv-01448-AWI-LJO Document 18 Filed 09/20/07 Page 2 of 2