Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-01266/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-01266-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Mark A. McKenzie
Petitioner
James A. Yates
Respondent

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MARK A. MCKENZIE, )

)

)

Petitioner, )

)

v. )

)

)

JAMES A. YATES, )

)

)

Respondent. )

)

 )

1:05-cv-01266-LJO-TAG HC 

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND

RECOMMENDATION (Doc. 10)

ORDER DISMISSING PETITION FOR WRIT

OF HABEAS CORPUS (Doc. 1)

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT

TO ENTER JUDGMENT

On October 5, 2005, Petitioner filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 2254 in this Court. (Doc. 1). 

On September 8, 2006, the Magistrate Judge assigned to the case filed a Report and

Recommendation recommending the petition for writ of habeas corpus be dismissed because

Petitioner’s claim of being unconstitutionally denied credits at a prison disciplinary hearing was

now moot since Petitioner had been released from prison. (Doc. 10). This Report and

Recommendation was served on all parties and contained notice that any objections were to be

filed within thirty days from the date of service of that order. On September 18, 2006, Petitioner

timely filed his objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation. (Doc. 11). 

Case 1:05-cv-01266-LJO -TAG Document 14 Filed 03/06/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted

a de novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court concludes that

the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation is supported by the record and proper

analysis. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Report and Recommendation, filed September 8, 2006 (Doc. 10), is

ADOPTED IN FULL;

2. This petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. 1), is DISMISSED; and

3. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to ENTER JUDGMENT and close the file. 

This order terminates the action in its entirety. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 5, 2007 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill 

b9ed48 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:05-cv-01266-LJO -TAG Document 14 Filed 03/06/07 Page 2 of 2