Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_11-cv-01315/USCOURTS-caed-1_11-cv-01315-9/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Rowan Brooks
Petitioner
James Yates
Respondent

Document Text:

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

On March 28, 2016, the Ninth Circuit issued its decision, affirming in part and reversing in 

part the dismissal of the petition. (Doc. 43). In that decision, the Ninth Circuit noted that the “district 

court did not make findings with respect to whether Brooks was reasonably diligent.” (Id.). On 

remand, the Ninth Circuit directed this Court to make a determination whether Petitioner acted 

diligently in pursuing relief from the Court’s judgment dismissing the petition. (Id.). 

In light of the remand directions, the Court will require the parties to file briefs on the issue of 

whether Petitioner acted diligently in pursuing relief from the Court’s order dismissing the petition. 

The parties shall file briefs on this issue within sixty days of service of this order. 

///

///

///

///

ROWAN BROOKS,

 Petitioner,

v.

JAMES YATES,

Respondent.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: 1:11-cv-01315-LJO-JLT

AMENDED ORDER DIRECTING PARTIES TO 

FILE BRIEFS AND SETTING BRIEFING 

SCHEDULE

SIXTY-DAY DEADLINE

Case 1:11-cv-01315-LJO-JLT Document 48 Filed 05/16/16 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Accordingly, the Court ORDERS:

1. The parties SHALL FILE briefs addressing the issue of whether Petitioner acted diligently 

in pursuing relief from the Court’s order dismissing the petition within sixty days of service 

of this order. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 13, 2016 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:11-cv-01315-LJO-JLT Document 48 Filed 05/16/16 Page 2 of 2