Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-01722/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-01722-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Gumaro Baez
Petitioner
William Muniz
Respondent

Document Text:

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GUMARO BAEZ,

Petitioner,

 v.

WILLIAM MUNIZ, Warden, Salinas

Valley State Prison,

Respondent. /

No. C 15-01722 WHA

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

Petitioner Gumaro Baez is currently incarcerated in the state of California. Pursuant to

28 U.S.C. 2254, he has filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus, through his counsel. In his

petition for writ of habeas corpus, he has stated valid claims under Section 2254. Thus,

respondent is ORDERED TO ANSWER THE PETITION. 

RESPONDENT SHALL FILE WITH THE COURT AND SERVE ON PETITIONER, WITHIN

NINETY DAYS OF THE ISSUANCE OF THIS ORDER, AN ANSWER conforming in all respects to Rule

5 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases, showing cause why a writ of habeas corpus should

not be granted based on the claims found cognizable herein. Respondent shall file with the

answer and serve on petitioner a copy of all portions of the state trial record that have been

transcribed previously and that are relevant to a determination of the issues presented by the

petition. The record must be indexed. If petitioner wishes to respond to the answer, he SHALL

FILE A TRAVERSE AND SERVE IT ON RESPONDENT WITHIN THIRTY DAYS OF THE DATE THAT

THE ANSWER IS FILED. 

Case 3:15-cv-01722-WHA Document 11 Filed 12/09/15 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Respondent may file, within ninety days, a motion to dismiss on procedural grounds in

lieu of an answer, as set forth in the Advisory Committee Notes to Rule 4 of the Rules

Governing Section 2254 Cases. If respondent files such a motion, petitioner shall file with the

Court and serve on respondent an opposition or statement of non-opposition within thirty days of

the date the motion is filed, and respondent shall file with the Court and serve on petitioner a

reply within fifteen days of the date any opposition is filed.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: December 9, 2015. 

WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:15-cv-01722-WHA Document 11 Filed 12/09/15 Page 2 of 2