Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-02575/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-02575-3/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Smart Modular Technologies, Inc.
Defendant
Solectron Technology Singapore Pte. Ltd.
Plaintiff

Document Text:

U

nite

d

States District C

o

u

rt

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

G:\CRBALL\2006\2575\orderredismiss2.wpd

U

nite

d

States District C

o

u

rt

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SOLECTRON TECHNOLOGY

SINGAPORE PTE. LTD.,

Plaintiff,

 v.

SMART MODULAR TECHNOLOGIES,

INC.,

Defendant.

 /

No. C 06-02575 CRB

ORDER

The Court previously granted defendant’s motion to dismiss plaintiff’s promissory

fraud claim with 14 days leave to amend. Plaintiff has advised the Court that it does not

intend to amend. The parties dispute whether plaintiff’s failure to amend precludes it from

later moving to amend to reinstate a claim for promissory fraud.

It is premature for the Court to decide the issue at this time. When and if plaintiff

files a motion to amend to add a claim for promissory estoppel the Court can decide if leave

should be granted. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 5, 2006

 

CHARLES R. BREYER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:06-cv-02575-CRB Document 24 Filed 07/05/06 Page 1 of 2
U

nite

d

States District C

o

u

rt

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

G:\CRBALL\2006\2575\orderredismiss2.wpd 2

Case 3:06-cv-02575-CRB Document 24 Filed 07/05/06 Page 2 of 2