Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-00488/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-00488-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Austin Freight Systems, Inc.
Defendant
Hill Country Bakery, LLC
Defendant
Nationwide Agribusiness Insurance Company
Plaintiff

Document Text:

JOINT MOTION AND STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEFENDANTS’ TIME TO 

RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

HAYNES AND BOONE, LLP

Kenneth G. Parker (Bar No. 182911) kenneth.parker@haynesboone.com Christopher B. Maciel (Bar No. 300733)

 christopher.maciel@haynesboone.com 600 Anton Blvd., Suite 700

Costa Mesa, California 92626

Telephone: (949) 202-3014

Facsimile: (949) 202-3114

Attorneys for Defendant

Hill Country Bakery, LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – SACRAMENTO DIVISION

NATIONWIDE AGRIBUSINESS 

INSURANCE COMPANY, an Iowa

corporation,

Plaintiff,

vs.

HILL COUNTRY BAKERY, LLC, 

a Texas limited liability company;

AUSTIN FREIGHT SYSTEMS, 

INC., a Texas corporation; and 

DOES 1 through 30, inclusive,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 2:15−CV−00488−MCE−CMK

ASSIGNED TO: 

Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr.

REFERRED TO:

Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison

JOINT MOTION AND 

STIPULATION TO EXTEND

DEFENDANTS’ TIME TO 

RESPOND TO INITIAL 

COMPLAINT; ORDER THEREON

Complaint Filed: February 4, 2015 

Case 2:15-cv-00488-MCE-CMK Document 6 Filed 03/13/15 Page 1 of 3
2

JOINT MOTION AND STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEFENDANTS’ TIME TO 

RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WHEREAS, Plaintiff NATIONWIDE AGRIBUSINESS 

INSURANCE COMPANY. (“Plaintiff”) filed a Complaint in the within action on 

February 4, 2015 and served it sometime after February 4, 2015;

WHEREAS, HILL COUNTRY BAKERY, LLC and AUSTIN 

FREIGHT SYSTEMS, INC. (collectively “Defendants”) filed Notice of Removal 

on March 4, 2015; 

WHEREAS , this action is related to an earlier-filed action pending 

before Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. entitled Crain Walnut Shelling, Inc. v. Hill 

Country Bakery, LLC, et al., United States District Court Case No. 2:15-CV00034-GEB-CMK (the “Crain Action”) because the Plaintiff is seeking 

subrogation related to the allegations of the Crain Action;

WHEREAS, one or more of the parties will file Notice of Related 

Case regarding this action and the Crain Action;

WHEREAS, the parties desire to pursue settlement discussion of this 

action and the Crain Action and also to set response dates that are the same dates; 

and

WHEREAS, the parties have agreed that both Defendants may have 

additional time to respond to the initial Complaint to enable the parties to further 

discuss the merits of their respective claims and defenses and the potential to 

resolve this action without the need for further litigation;

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED between the parties, 

by and through their counsel of record, and the parties hereby move this Court, as 

necessary, for an order providing, that Defendants shall have through and including 

April 13, 2015, to respond to Plaintiff’s initial Complaint.

///

///

///

///

Case 2:15-cv-00488-MCE-CMK Document 6 Filed 03/13/15 Page 2 of 3
3

JOINT MOTION AND STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEFENDANTS’ TIME TO 

RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DATED: March 10, 2015 HAYNES AND BOONE, LLP

Kenneth G. Parker

By: /s/ Kenneth G. Parker

Kenneth G. Parker

Attorneys for Defendant

Hill Country Bakery, LLC

MAIRE BURGEES & DEEDON

Patrick L. Deedon

By: /s/ Patrick L. Deedon Patrick L. Deedon

Attorneys for Defendant

Austin Freight Systems, Inc.

(as authorized on March 10, 2015)

LAW OFFICE OF MCCARTHY & 

BEAVERS

Jeffery Alan Korinko

By: /s/ Jeffery Alan Korinko Jeffery Alan Korinko

Attorneys for Plaintiff

Nationwide Agribusiness Insurance 

Company

(as authorized on March 10, 2015)

ORDER

The Court having reviewed the foregoing Stipulation, and good cause 

appearing therefor:

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that both Defendants shall have through and 

including April 13, 2015, to respond to Plaintiff’s initial Complaint.

Dated: March 12, 2015

Case 2:15-cv-00488-MCE-CMK Document 6 Filed 03/13/15 Page 3 of 3