Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-01812/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-01812-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Lydia Abreau
Defendant
William P. Carnazzo
Defendant
City of Sacramento
Defendant
Thomas Friery
Defendant
Samuel L. Jackson
Defendant
Deborah Schulte
Plaintiff
Brett M. Witter
Defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-1-

STIPULATION AND REQUEST FOR COURT APPROVAL OF 

CONTINUED HEARING DATE ON DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS

ANTHONY A PROL330 AFWE0 Dougl S OFSIRONFose ICEJ. Aas vi LS LlPOI lB OF e,Aoul CWeva A CDMO 95ORrd, 661 P Sui OR-384 REtAe 1T4I90ON

LAW OFFICES OF ANTHONY J. POIDMORE

A Professional Law Corporation

Anthony J. Poidmore, Esq. (SBN 51346)

3300 Douglas Blvd., Suite 190

Roseville, CA 95661

Telephone No.: 916-787-1290

FAX No.: 916-787-1293

Attorney for Plaintiff 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DEBORAH SCHULTE,

 Plaintiff,

v.

CITY OF SACRAMENTO, SAMUEL L.

JACKSON, THOMAS FRIERY, LYDIA

ABREAU, WILLIAM P. CARNAZZO

AND BRETT M. WITTER,

 Defendants.

____________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CIV NO.: 2:05-CV-01812-FCD-JFM

STIPULATION AND REQUEST FOR

COURT APPROVAL OF CONTINUED

HEARING DATE ON DEFENDANTS'

MOTION TO DISMISS

Date: January 27, 2006

Time: 10:00 a.m.

Dept: 2

Courtroom: The Honorable Frank C. 

 Damrell, Jr.

________________________________

All parties hereby stipulate that the hearing date of December 16, 2005, at 10:00 a.m. in

Department 2 may be continued to January 27, 2006, at 10:00 a.m. in Department 2. The ground

Case 2:05-cv-01812-WBS-JFM Document 17 Filed 11/30/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-2-

STIPULATION AND REQUEST FOR COURT APPROVAL OF 

CONTINUED HEARING DATE ON DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS

for this continuance is that Plaintiff will be filing a motion to amend the Complaint and will seek

a ruling that coincides with the ruling to be issued on Defendants' Motion to Dismiss. No prior

continuance has been granted for the hearing on the Motion to Dismiss. 

It is hereby stipulated: 

Dated: 11/28/05 /s/ 

ADRIAN L. RANDOLPH, Attorney for

Defendants

Dated: 11/21/05

/s/ 

ANTHONY J. POIDMORE, Attorney for

Plaintiff 

IT IS SO ORDERED: 

Dated: November 30, 2005

/s/ Frank C. Damrell Jr. 

THE HONORABLE FRANK C. DAMRELL, JR.

Case 2:05-cv-01812-WBS-JFM Document 17 Filed 11/30/05 Page 2 of 2