Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-01368/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-01368-2/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Lowell Baisden
Defendant
United States of America
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

McGREGOR W. SCOTT

United States Attorney

JACQUELINE C. BROWN

Member, New York Bar

STEPHEN J. SCHAEFFER

D.C. Bar No. 491116

Trial Attorneys, Tax Division

U.S. Department of Justice

Post Office Box 7238, Ben Franklin Station

Washington, DC 20044-7238

Telephone: (202) 616-9482 (Jacqueline Brown)

Telephone: (202) 307-2240 (Stephen Schaeffer)

Fax: (202) 514-6770

Attorneys for Plaintiff, United States of America

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Case No. 1:06-cv-01368 OWW-TAG

Order Granting Plaintiff’s Motion to 

Plaintiff, Strike Jury Demand

(Doc. 30)

v.

LOWELL BAISDEN,

___________________D_e_fe_n_d_a_n_t_._____________/

This matter comes before the Court on the Motion of the United States to Strike

Defendant Lowell Baisden’s demand for a jury trial. (Doc. 30). The United States argued that

the demand should be stricken because a jury trial is not authorized on its purely equitable claim

for a permanent injunction. The Motion was heard on February 26, 2007 in Bakersfield,

California. (Doc. 32). On February 5, 2007, the defendant filed a Notice of Non-Opposition to

the motion. (Doc. 60). 

In the interests of justice and for good cause shown, the Motion of the United States to

Strike Defendant’s Demand for a Jury Trial is hereby GRANTED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 28, 2007 /s/ Theresa A. Goldner 

j6eb3d UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

Case 1:06-cv-01368-AWI-MJS Document 66 Filed 02/28/07 Page 1 of 1