Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-15-07817/USCOURTS-ca4-15-07817-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Kirk L. Loney
Appellant
United States of America
Appellee

Document Text:

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-7817

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

KIRK L. LONEY,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior 

District Judge. (3:02-cr-00290-REP-1; 3:11-cv-00337-REP)

Submitted: April 21, 2016 Decided: April 25, 2016

Before WILKINSON, KING, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kirk L. Loney, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Steven Dry, Stephen Wiley 

Miller, Assistant United States Attorneys, Michael Arlen Jagels, 

Special Assistant United States Attorney, Matthew Childs Ackley, 

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 15-7817 Doc: 9 Filed: 04/25/2016 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Kirk L. Loney appeals from the district court’s order 

construing his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion as an unauthorized 

successive 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion and dismissing it on 

that basis. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible 

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the 

district court. United States v. Loney, Nos. 3:02-cr-000290-REP1; 3:11-cv-00337-REP (E.D. Va. Sept. 10, 2015). We dispense with 

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Appeal: 15-7817 Doc: 9 Filed: 04/25/2016 Pg: 2 of 2