Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-16-06895/USCOURTS-ca4-16-06895-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Morris Speight-Bey
Appellant
Charles Williams
Appellee

Document Text:

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-6895

MORRIS SPEIGHT-BEY,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

CHARLES WILLIAMS,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern 

District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. Gina M. Groh, Chief

District Judge. (3:16-cv-00069-GMG-MJA)

Submitted: October 18, 2016 Decided: October 21, 2016 

Before WILKINSON, KING, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Morris Speight-Bey, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 16-6895 Doc: 8 Filed: 10/21/2016 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Morris Speight-Bey appeals the district court’s order 

dismissing his original 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition and opening a 

new case with his refiled § 2241 petition, which remains pending 

below. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible 

error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma 

pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district 

court. Speight-Bey v. Williams, No. 3:16-cv-00069-GMG-MJA (N.D.

W. Va. June 16, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because 

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Appeal: 16-6895 Doc: 8 Filed: 10/21/2016 Pg: 2 of 2