Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-00739/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-00739-2/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Scott Jones
Defendant
Roland Thomas Koch
Plaintiff
Sacramento County
Defendant

Document Text:

{01573001.DOCX} 1

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO MODIFY SCHEDULING ORDER

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

PORTER | SCOTT

350 University Avenue, Suite 200

Sacramento, CA 95825

TEL: 916.929.1481

FAX: 916.927.3706

A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION

David A. Melton, SBN 176340

Colleen R. Howard, SBN 257661

Taylor W. Rhoan, SBN 294941

350 University Avenue, Suite 200

Sacramento, California 95825

TEL: 916.929.1481

FAX: 916.927.3706

Attorneys for Defendant

SCOTT JONES

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Roland Thomas Koch,

Plaintiff,

v.

SACRAMENTO COUNTY; SCOTT 

JONES, Sheriff of Sacramento County, in 

his individual and official capacity; John 

Doe 1 “Booking Officer”; John Doe 2 

“Classification Officer”; John Does 3-10 “4th

Fl. Officers”; John Doe 11 “Classification 

Officer”; John Doe 12 “Facility 

Commander”; John Does 13-20 “7th Fl. 

Officers”; John Doe 21 “Supervisor”; John 

Does 22-29 “3rd Fl. Officers”; John Doe 30, 

Bdg# 1039? “Supervisor”; John Doe 31, 

Bdg# 589? “Supervisor” in their individual

and official capacities;

Defendants.

____________________________________/

CASE NO. 2:15-cv-00739-JAM-CKD

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO 

MODIFY SCHEDULING ORDER 

/ / /

/ / /

Case 2:15-cv-00739-JAM-CKD Document 19 Filed 07/06/16 Page 1 of 3
{01573001.DOCX} 2

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO MODIFY SCHEDULING ORDER

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

PORTER | SCOTT

350 University Avenue, Suite 200

Sacramento, CA 95825

TEL: 916.929.1481

FAX: 916.927.3706

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between Plaintiff ROLAND 

THOMAS KOCH, in Pro Per, and Defendant SCOTT JONES, pursuant to Local Rule 143 as 

follows:

1. The parties respectfully request that the District Court modify the Discovery and

Scheduling Order to continue the dispositive motion deadline for an additional 30 days, based on 

good cause appearing as more fully set forth below. 

2. The Court’s Discovery and Scheduling Order originally set the dispositive motion 

deadline for June 10, 2016. (Document 13) The 

Court has previously granted one extension of time for 30 days on the deadline to file dispositive 

motions. (Document 17.) No further orders modifying the Discovery and Scheduling Order have 

been entered.

3. The parties are in good faith attempting to resolve this matter and are in the process 

of negotiating a settlement. In an attempt to avoid the time and expense of preparing and opposing 

a motion for summary judgment, the parties respectfully request that the dispositive motion 

deadline be continued for 30 days to allow the parties time to hopefully resolve this matter. 

Plaintiff in this matter confirmed with Counsel for Defendant over the telephone that he was in 

agreement with the continuance. (See Exhibit A, Declaration of Taylor W. Rhoan filed herewith.)

4. Therefore, the parties respectfully submit that good cause exists to amend the 

dispositive motion deadline of the Discovery and Scheduling Order dated November 30, 2015

(Document 13) and subsequently modified on June 10, 2016 (Document 17) as follows: 

Deadline Old Date New Date

Dispositive motion deadline July 8, 2016 August 8, 2016

/ / /

/ / /

/ / /

/ / /

Case 2:15-cv-00739-JAM-CKD Document 19 Filed 07/06/16 Page 2 of 3
{01573001.DOCX} 3

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO MODIFY SCHEDULING ORDER

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

PORTER | SCOTT

350 University Avenue, Suite 200

Sacramento, CA 95825

TEL: 916.929.1481

FAX: 916.927.3706

This Stipulation may be signed in counterparts and any facsimile or electronic signature 

shall be as valid as an original signature.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Dated: July 5, 2016

By //s// Roland Thomas Koch as authorized 

ROLAND THOMAS KOCH

Plaintiff in Pro Per

Dated: July 5, 2016 PORTER SCOTT

A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION

By //s// Taylor W. Rhoan 

Taylor W. Rhoan

Attorney for Defendant 

SCOTT JONES

ORDER

Having reviewed the above stipulation and good cause appearing therefore, IT IS HEREBY 

ORDERED that the Discovery and Scheduling Order, be modified with the new schedule as set 

forth above.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 6, 2016

_____________________________________

CAROLYN K. DELANEY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:15-cv-00739-JAM-CKD Document 19 Filed 07/06/16 Page 3 of 3