Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-4_03-cr-01684/USCOURTS-azd-4_03-cr-01684-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Daniel Rivera-Sanchez
Defendant
United States of America
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Daniel Rivera-Sanchez,

Petitioner,

v.

United States of America, 

Respondent.

_______________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CR 03-1684 TUC-DCB

CV 05-0029 TUC-DCB

Prisoner ID. 480-196

ORDER

On March 17, 2004, the Court sentenced Petitioner Daniel Rivera-Sanchez to 36

months of imprisonment with the Bureau of Prisons and 3 years supervised release,

pursuant to a Plea Agreement that included a waiver of his right to appeal the sentence,

directly or by collateral attack.

On January 11, 2005, Petitioner nevertheless filed a Motion to Vacate and to Set

Aside the Sentence, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Petition). On February 3, 2005, the

Court denied Petitioner's collateral attack, pursuant to this habeas Petition. On February

18, 2005, the Petitioner's copy of the Court's Order was returned as not delivered because

Petitioner was no longer being housed at the FCI-Lompoc.

Unaware that his Petition was denied, on February 25, 2005, Petitioner filed a

Motion for Permission to File a Supplemental Pleading to his Petition. On March 2,

2005, the Government filed a Motion to Withdraw from the Plea Agreement and to

proceed once more before this Court to prosecute Petitioner for the charged offense. 

Case 4:03-cr-01684-DCB-BPV Document 29 Filed 01/20/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 2

On March 23, 2005, this Court recognized that while the Government's motion

was properly brought, it would nevertheless be an inefficient use of this Court's judicial

resources to grant it. The Petitioner's motion to supplement his meritless Petition would

equally be a waste of time. The Court denied the Government's motion, but inadvertently

failed to rule on Petitioner's motion to supplement his Petition. It remains pending.

Recently, Petitioner contacted this Court by telephone to request the status of his

Motion to Vacate and Set Aside His Sentence. It, thereby, came to this Court's attention

that Petitioner is incarcerated at the Cibola County Correction Center (CCCC)in Milan,

New Mexico. Pursuant to the Rule of Practice for the United States District Court,

District of Arizona, LR Civ. 83.3(d), Petitioner is responsible for filing a written notice of

his change in address. The Court will, however, resend copies of its Orders to him at

CCCC. 

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that the Motion for Permission to Supplement Pleading

(document 25) is DENIED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall change

Petitioner's address to be: Cibola County Correction Center, P.O. Box 3540, Milan,

N.M., 87021.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall resend to the

Petitioner at this new address copies of the following documents: Order (Documents 23);

Judgment (Document 24), and Order (Document 28).

DATED this 19th day of January, 2006.

copies to Petitioner by cjs

Case 4:03-cr-01684-DCB-BPV Document 29 Filed 01/20/06 Page 2 of 2