Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cr-00703/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cr-00703-6/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Patrick Arnold
Defendant
USA
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Nanci L. Clarence, SBN 122286 

Joshua H. Lerner, SBN 220755 

CLARENCE & DYER LLP 

899 Ellis Street 

San Francisco, CA 94109 

Telephone: (415) 749-1800 

Facsimile: (415) 749-1694 

Email: nclarence@clarencedyer.com jlerner@clarencedyer.com

Richard D. Collins (admitted pro hac vice) 

Collins, McDonald & Gann, P.C. 

One Old Country Road, Suite 250 

Carle Place, NY 11514 

Telephone: (516) 294-0300 

Facsimile: (516) 294-0477 

Email: rcollins@cmgesq.com

Attorneys for Defendant Patrick Arnold 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff, 

 vs. 

PATRICK ARNOLD, 

 Defendant 

Case No.: No. CR-05-00703 SI 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER CONTINUING TRIAL 

SETTING HEARING 

The parties hereby request that the Trial Setting Hearing, currently set for March 10, 

2006 at 11:00 AM, be continued to March 24, 2006 at 11:00 AM. The parties stipulate to the 

following: 

//// 

////

Case 3:05-cr-00703-SI Document 24 Filed 03/06/2006 Page 1 of 4
 Case 3:05-cr-00703-SI Document 25 Filed 03/08/06 Page 1 of 4
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING TRIAL SETTING HEARING 

Case No.: CR-05-00703 SI 

2 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1. The parties have been engaged in lengthy settlement discussions both oral and written. 

The parties have made progress towards settlement, but no final resolution has been 

reached. 

2. The Assistant United States Attorney, Mr. Nedrow, has been in trial for the last two 

weeks, and, therefore, has been unable to participate in the discussions necessary to reach 

a final resolution. The trial essentially has prevented the parties from moving forward 

with discussions. The parties expect Mr. Nedrow’s trial to end during the week of March 

10, and expect to resume discussions at that point. Mr. Nedrow expects that his trial will 

prevent him from appearing at the hearing scheduled for March 10, 2006. 

3. Both counsel have agreed that the time between March 10, 2006 and March 24, 2006 

should be excluded under the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(A) and (B)(i) and 

(ii). 

Kevin V. Ryan 

 United States Attorney 

 

 

Dated: March 3, 2006 By: /s/: Jeff Nedrow 

 Jeff Nedrow 

 Assistant United States Attorney 

 CLARENCE & DYER LLP 

Dated: March 3, 2006 

 By: /s/: Nanci Clarence 

 Nanci L. Clarence 

 Attorney for Defendant Patrick Arnold 

Case 3:05-cr-00703-SI Document 24 Filed 03/06/2006 Page 2 of 4
 Case 3:05-cr-00703-SI Document 25 Filed 03/08/06 Page 2 of 4
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING TRIAL SETTING HEARING 

Case No.: CR-05-00703 SI 

3 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

 Pursuant to the above stipulation of the parties, IT IS ORDERED that the hearing 

scheduled for March 10, 2006 shall be continued until March 24, 2006. In addition, IT IS 

ORDERED that the time between March 10 and March 24 shall be excluded from the 

computation of the time period within which the trial must commence. Based upon the grounds 

set forth in the parties’ stipulation, the Court finds that the ends of justice outweigh the interests 

of the public and the parties in a speedier trial. 

Dated: March ______, 2006 

 

 HON. SUSAN ILLSTON 

 U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 3:05-cr-00703-SI Document 24 Filed 03/06/2006 Page 3 of 4
 Case 3:05-cr-00703-SI Document 25 Filed 03/08/06 Page 3 of 4
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING TRIAL SETTING HEARING 

Case No.: CR-05-00703 SI 

4 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Proof of Service 

 I, Abbie Chin, I am over eighteen years of age and not a party to the within action; my business address is 

899 Ellis Street, San Francisco, California 94109; I am employed in the County of San Francisco. 

On March 6, 2006, I served a copy, with all exhibits, of the following documents: 

• STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING TRIAL SETTING 

HEARING 

______ (BY FAX) By transmitting by facsimile machine to the number addressed as below; the facsimile machine I 

used complied with California Rules of Court, rule 2003 and no error was reported by the machine. Pursuant to 

California Rules of Court, rule 2006(d), I caused the machine to print a transmission record of the transmission. 

__X____ (BY ELECTRONIC SERVICE) I caused an electronic delivery subject to 28 U.S.C &1746, Local Rules 

or General Orders of this Court regarding Electronic Case Filing. All pleadings and papers must be electronically 

served in accordance with those Rules or General Orders with email address(es) as noted below: 

VIA Email: 

Jeff Nedrow 

Assistant United States Attorney 

United States Courthouse 

150 Almaden Blvd, Ste. 900 

San Jose, California 95113 

Email: jeff.nedrow@usdoj.com 

Via Email: 

Jeffrey Finigan 

AUSA 

United States Courthouse 

450 Golden Gate Avenue 

San Francisco, CA 94102 

Email: Jeffrey.finigan@usdoj.gov 

Via Email: 

Rick Collins, Esq. 

Collins, McDonald & Gann, P.C. 

One Old Country Road, Suite 250 

Carle Place, NY 11514 

Fax: 516-294-0477 

Email: rcollins@cmgesq.com 

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the state of California that the foregoing is true and 

correct and that this declaration was executed on the above stated date. 

 /s/: Abbie Chin 

Abbie Chin 

Case 3:05-cr-00703-SI Document 24 Filed 03/06/2006 Page 4 of 4
 Case 3:05-cr-00703-SI Document 25 Filed 03/08/06 Page 4 of 4