Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-18-07329/USCOURTS-ca4-18-07329-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Metkel Alana
Appellant
Harold W. Clarke
Appellee

Document Text:

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-7329

METKEL ALANA,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

HAROLD W. CLARKE, Dir. of Va. DOC,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at 

Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (2:18-cv-00205-RAJ-RJK)

Submitted: March 14, 2019 Decided: March 19, 2019

Before WYNN and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit 

Judge.

Remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Metkel Alana, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 18-7329 Doc: 11 Filed: 03/19/2019 Pg: 1 of 3
2

PER CURIAM:

Virginia prisoner Metkel Alana appeals the district court’s order adopting the 

magistrate judge’s recommendation to dismiss Alana’s 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition 

as successive and unauthorized. Parties are accorded 30 days after the entry of the 

district court’s final judgment or order to note an appeal. Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A). 

The district court may, however, extend the time for filing a notice of appeal if a party so 

moves within 30 days after expiration of the original appeal period and demonstrates 

excusable neglect or good cause for the extension. Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5)(A)(i)-(ii); 

Washington v. Bumgarner, 882 F.2d 899, 900-01 (4th Cir. 1989).

The district court’s order dismissing Alana’s § 2254 petition was entered on the 

docket on September 7, 2018. Thus, Alana had until October 9, 2018,

* to file a notice of 

appeal. Alana’s notice of appeal was filed, at the earliest, on October 15, 2018. See 

Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266, 276 (1988) (holding that a pro se prisoner’s notice of 

appeal is considered filed the moment it is delivered to prison authorities for mailing to 

the court).

Because Alana’s notice of appeal was filed beyond the expiration of the appeal 

period, but within the 30-day excusable neglect period and posits an excuse for its 

untimeliness, we construe Alana’s filing as a timely request for an extension of time to 

 * The 30-day appeal period expired on October 7th, a Sunday, and Monday, 

October 8th, was a federal holiday. The notice of appeal was, therefore, due on the next 

business day, or Tuesday, October 9th. See Fed. R. App. P. 26(a)(1)(C).

USCA4 Appeal: 18-7329 Doc: 11 Filed: 03/19/2019 Pg: 2 of 3
3

file an appeal. Accordingly, we remand this case to the district court for the limited 

purpose of determining whether Alana has demonstrated excusable neglect or good cause

warranting an extension of the appeal period. The record, as supplemented, will then be 

returned to this court for further consideration.

REMANDED

USCA4 Appeal: 18-7329 Doc: 11 Filed: 03/19/2019 Pg: 3 of 3