Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_13-cv-04446/USCOURTS-cand-4_13-cv-04446-5/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Antioch Unified School District
Defendant
Brianna
Plaintiff
Pittsburg Unified School District
Defendant
Arlicia Simmons
Plaintiff

Document Text:

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON

CASE NO.: C-134446-KAW

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

TIMOTHY P. MURPHY, Esq. (120920)

DOLORES M. DONOHOE, Esq. (111432)

EDRINGTON, SCHIRMER & MURPHY LLP

2300 Contra Costa Boulevard, Suite 450

Pleasant Hill, CA 94523-3936

Telephone: (925) 827-3300

Facsimile: (925) 827-3320

TMurphy@esmlawfirm.com

LDonohoe@esmlawfirm.com

Attorneys for Defendants,

PITTSBURG UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT,

ANTIOCH UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT

IN THE UNITED STATE DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

OAKLAND DIVISION

BRIANNA, an individual and ARLICIA 

SIMMONS an Individual,

Plaintiffs,

v.

PITTSBURG UNIFIED SCHOOL 

DISTRICT; ANTIOCH UNIFIED SCHOOL 

DISTRICT, and DOES 1-20, 

Defendants.

/

 CASE NO.: C-134446-KAW

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL 

AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

THEREON

Fed. R. Civ. P.41

 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties to this action, through their 

designated counsel, that defendant PITTSBURG UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT be and hereby is 

dismissed with prejudice pursuant to F.R.C.P. 41(a)(1). As PITTSBURG UNIFIED SCHOOL 

DISTRICT was the last remaining party to this action, the entire case may now be dismissed, with 

prejudice. Each party is to bear their own attorney’s fees and costs.

///

///

///

Case 4:13-cv-04446-KAW Document 80 Filed 01/27/15 Page 1 of 2
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON

CASE NO.: C-134446-KAW

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DATED: 1/20/15 ADAMS ESQ., A Professional Corporation

 /s/

Gail S. Hodes, Esq. 

Attorney for Plaintiffs BRIANNA, an 

individual and ARLICIA SIMMONS an 

Individual,

DATED: 1/20/15 EDRINGTON, SCHIRMER & MURPHY LLP

/s/ 

Dolores M. Donohoe

Attorney for Defendant PITTSBURG

UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT

ORDER

In accordance with the foregoing stipulation, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendant 

PITTSBURG UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT is hereby DISMISSED from this action WITH 

PREJUDICE. As PITTSBURG UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT was the last remaining party to 

this action, the entire case may now be dismissed, with prejudice. Each party shall bear their 

own attorneys’ fees and costs.

DATED: By: 

 MAGISTRATE JUDGE KANDIS A. WESTMORE 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 45.X.B.

I, Dolores M. Donohoe, attest that concurrence in the electronic filing of this document 

has been obtained from each of the signatories. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws 

of the United States of America that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed this 20th day of 

January, 2014, at Pleasant Hill, California

/s/ 

Dolores M. Donohoe, Esq. 

1/27/15 MAGISTRATE

Case 4:13-cv-04446-KAW Document 80 Filed 01/27/15 Page 2 of 2