Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_09-cv-02270/USCOURTS-cand-3_09-cv-02270-6/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Eric Gundersen
Plaintiff
Lennar Associates Management, LLC
Defendant
Lennar Corporation
Defendant
Lennar Homes
Defendant

Document Text:

- 1 - 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

[PROPOSED] ORDER ALLOWING THE FILING OF 

DEFENDANT’S COUNTERCLAIMNo. C-09-02270 CRB 

Cindi L. Pusateri (CA State Bar No. 216899) 

cpusateri@meyerwhite.com 

Hien Nguyen (CA State Bar No. 229794) 

hnguyen@meyerwhite.com 

MEYER WHITE LLP 

515 S. Flower Street, Suite 3600 

Los Angeles, CA 90071 

Telephone: (213) 236-3631 

Facsimile: (213) 236-3661 

Julia Lynn Nye (CA State Bar No. 160092) 

jnye@meyerwhite.com 

Ted D. Meyer (Pro Hac Vice) 

(TX State Bar No. 13997500) 

tmeyer@meyerwhite.com 

MEYER WHITE LLP 

600 Travis Street, Suite 900 

Houston, TX 77002 

Telephone: (713) 951-1400 

Facsimile: (713) 951-1499 

Attorneys for Defendants 

Lennar Associates Management, LLC 

and Lennar Corporation dba Lennar Homes 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

Upon consideration of the parties’ Stipulation Concerning the Filing of Defendant’s 

Counterclaim (“Stipulation”), and good cause appearing therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED 

that: 

1. Defendant Lennar Associates Management, LLC (“Defendant”) shall be allowed to 

file a Counterclaim, in the form attached as Exhibit 1 to the parties’ Stipulation. The Counterclaim 

ERIC GUNDERSEN, on behalf of himself and 

all others similarly situated, 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

LENNAR ASSOCIATES MANAGEMENT, 

LLC; LENNAR CORPORATION, dba 

LENNAR HOMES; and DOES 1- 10, inclusive,

 Defendants. 

 No. C-09-02270 CRB 

[PROPOSED] ORDER ALLOWING 

FILING OF DEFENDANT LENNAR 

ASSOCIATES MANAGEMENT 

LLC’S COUNTERCLAIM 

Case 3:09-cv-02270-CRB Document 122 Filed 06/21/10 Page 1 of 2
- 2 - 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

[PROPOSED] ORDER ALLOWING THE FILING OF 

DEFENDANT’S COUNTERCLAIMNo. C-09-02270 CRB 

is deemed served and filed on the date of entry of this Order. 

2. Plaintiff shall answer or otherwise respond to Defendant’s Counterclaim within 

thirty (30) days from the date of this Order. 

3. The filing of Defendant’s Counterclaim merely supplements the operative Answer 

in this action, and Defendant’s responses and affirmative and other defenses alleged in the 

operative Answer to Plaintiff’s Complaint remain in effect. See Docket Entry Nos. 1-2 and 1. 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED, 

Dated: ____________ By: _______________________________ 

The Honorable Charles R. Breyer 

United States District Judge 

Northern District of California 

June 21, 2010

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Charles R. Breyer

Case 3:09-cv-02270-CRB Document 122 Filed 06/21/10 Page 2 of 2