Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_20-cv-02316/USCOURTS-caed-2_20-cv-02316-10/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Ronald Meza
Petitioner
Christian Pfeiffer
Respondent

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RONALD MEZA,

Petitioner,

v.

CHRISTIAN PFEIFFER,

Respondent.

No. 2:20-cv-02316-DAD-CSK (HC)

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND 

RECOMMENDATIONS AND DENYING 

PETITIONER’S MOTION TO VACATE THE 

JUDGMENT ENTERED IN THIS CASE

(Doc. Nos. 40, 51)

Petitioner Ronald Meza is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with a 

petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a 

United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On August 13, 2024, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations 

recommending that petitioner’s motion to vacate the judgment entered in this case on September 

20, 2022 (Doc. No. 40) be denied. (Doc. No. 51.) The pending findings and recommendations 

were served upon the parties and contained notice that any objections thereto were to be filed 

within fourteen (14) days after service. (Id. at 29.) To date, no objections have been filed, and 

the time in which to do so has passed.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), the court has conducted a 

de novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court concludes that the 

pending findings and recommendations are supported by the record and proper analysis.

Case 2:20-cv-02316-DAD-CSK Document 52 Filed 09/05/24 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Accordingly,

1. The findings and recommendations issued on August 13, 2024 (Doc. No. 51) are

adopted in full;

2. Petitioner’s motion to vacate the judgment entered in this case (Doc. No. 40) is 

denied; and

3. This case shall remain closed.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 4, 2024 

DALE A. DROZD

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:20-cv-02316-DAD-CSK Document 52 Filed 09/05/24 Page 2 of 2