Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-03543/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-03543-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Derral G. Adams
Respondent
Vrezh Papazyan
Petitioner

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

VREZH PAPAZYAN, 

Petitioner, 

 vs.

DERRAL G. ADAMS,

Respondent. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. C 05-3543 JSW (PR)

ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

On September 1, 2005, Petitioner filed this pro se petition for a writ of habeas

corpus (docket no. 1). On the same day that the petition was filed, the Court sent a

notification to Petitioner informing him that he had neither submitted the correct

application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis nor paid the filing fee (docket no. 2). 

The Court provided a copy of the correct in forma pauperis application, along with a

return envelope, and a notification that the case would be dismissed if Petitioner failed to

respond to the Court’s request within thirty days. On September 26, 2005, the Court

received a letter from Petitioner stating he had a attempted to pay the fee with a copy of a

trust account withdrawal slip from the prison. However, he did not send proof that

payment had been received by the Court. 

On April 24, 2006, the Court dismissed the petition due to certain deficiencies, but

granted Petitioner thirty days in which to file an amended petition. The court notified

Petitioner that failure to amend by the designated time would result in a dismissal of the

case. In addition, the Court notified Petitioner that it had not received the filing fee and

that Petitioner must pay the fee or provide proof of prior payment within thirty days or the

Case 3:05-cv-03543-JSW Document 4 Filed 08/02/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

case would be dismissed.

More than thirty days have passed and Petitioner has not filed an amended petition

or paid the filing fee. Nor has Petitioner contacted the Court during this time to request

an extension of time to comply with the Court’s order. Accordingly, this case is

DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to pay the filing fee or to comply with this

Court’s order. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED:August 2, 2006

 

JEFFREY S. WHITE

United States District Judge

Case 3:05-cv-03543-JSW Document 4 Filed 08/02/06 Page 2 of 2