Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_24-cv-02385/USCOURTS-caed-2_24-cv-02385-2/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Vickie Bennett
Plaintiff
Commissioner of Social Security
Defendant

Document Text:

Stip. for Ext.; 2:24-CV-02385-JDP 1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

PHILLIP A. TALBERT

United States Attorney

MATHEW W. PILE, WSBN 32245

Associate General Counsel

Office of Program Litigation, Office 7

Social Security Administration

NOAH SCHABACKER, Maryland Bar

Special Assistant United States Attorney

6401 Security Boulevard

Baltimore, Maryland 21235

Telephone: (303) 844-6232

E-Mail: Noah.Schabacker@ssa.gov

Attorneys for Defendant

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

VICKIE BENNETT,

Plaintiff,

vs.

CAROLYN COLVIN,

Acting Commissioner of Social Security,1

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: 2:24-cv-02385-JDP

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME 

Pending the Court’s approval, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the 

parties, through their respective counsel of record, that the time for Defendant to respond to 

Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment be extended thirty (30) days from January 6, 2025, up 

to and including February 5, 2025. This is the Defendant’s first request for an extension. 

This matter was assigned on December 12, 2024. Based on a review of the record, 

undersigned counsel requires additional time to explore settlement options. Defendant 

apologizes to the Court for any inconvenience caused by this delay. Undersigned counsel 

contacted Plaintiff’s counsel on January 2, 2025, and he had no objection to this request.

1 Carolyn Colvin became the Acting Commissioner of Social Security on November 30, 2024. 

Pursuant to Rule 25(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Carolyn Colvin should be 

substituted for Martin O’Malley as the defendant in this suit. No further action need be taken to 

continue this suit by reason of the last sentence of section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 

U.S.C. § 405(g).

Case 2:24-cv-02385-JDP Document 15 Filed 01/06/25 Page 1 of 2
Stip. for Ext.; 2:24-CV-02385-JDP 2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

The parties further stipulate that the Court’s Scheduling Order shall be modified 

accordingly. 

Respectfully submitted,

Dated: January 3, 2025 /s/ Francesco Benavides* 

(*as authorized via e-mail on January 2, 2025)

FRANCESCO BENAVIDES

Attorney for Plaintiff

Dated: January 3, 2025 PHILLIP A. TALBERT

United States Attorney

MATHEW W. PILE

Associate General Counsel

Social Security Administration

By: /s/ Noah Schabacker 

NOAH SCHABACKER

Special Assistant U.S. Attorney

Attorneys for Defendant

ORDER

Pursuant to the parties’ stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED that Defendant shall have an 

extension, up to and including February 5, 2025, to respond to Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary 

Judgment.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 6, 2025 

JEREMY D. PETERSON

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:24-cv-02385-JDP Document 15 Filed 01/06/25 Page 2 of 2