Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-00808/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-00808-4/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Hector Melgoza Bolanos
Petitioner
Richard J. Kirkland
Respondent

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

HECTOR MELGOZA BOLANOS, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

)

v. )

)

)

RICHARD J. KIRKLAND, )

)

Respondent. )

 )

1:06-cv-00808 AWI-TAG (HC) 

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

(Doc. 10)

ORDER DISMISSING PETITION FOR WRIT

OF HABEAS CORPUS

(Doc. 1)

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO

ENTER JUDGMENT

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. 

On April 4, 2008, the Magistrate Judge assigned to the case filed a Findings and

Recommendations recommending that the petition for writ of habeas corpus be DISMISSED for

violation of the AEDPA's one-year limitation period. (Doc. 10). The Findings and

Recommendations were served on all parties and contained notice that any objections were to be

filed within fifteen days from the date of service of that order. On April 21, 2008, Petitioner filed

objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations. (Doc. 11). The objections

restate the procedural history of this writ, state that due process violations impacted his conviction,

and, without citation, states that pre-AEDPA law should apply to his case.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a de

Case 1:06-cv-00808-AWI-TAG Document 12 Filed 05/05/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, including Petitioner's objections,

the Court concludes that the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations are supported by the

record and proper analysis. Petitioner's objections present no grounds for questioning the Magistrate

Judge's analysis. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations issued April 4, 2008 (Doc. 10), is ADOPTED IN

FULL; 

2. The petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. 1) is DISMISSED; and

3. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to ENTER JUDGMENT for Respondent and close

the file.

This order terminates the action in its entirety.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 2, 2008 /s/ Anthony W. Ishii 

0m8i78 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-00808-AWI-TAG Document 12 Filed 05/05/08 Page 2 of 2