Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-01622/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-01622-3/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Anthony Alonzo
Plaintiff
Anthony Principi
Defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Plaintiff’s objections were filed in two blue folders, and it 1

was not immediately apparent that the filing contained objections to

the findings and recommendations. Accordingly, the request for an

extension of time to respond was docketed before plaintiff’s

objections. The objections consist of fifteen pages of written

objections and twenty-one attached exhibits, which were lodged with

the court. 

1

McGREGOR W. SCOTT

United States Attorney

JOHN F. GISLA, SB #42829

Assistant U.S. Attorney

501 I Street, Suite 10-100

Sacramento, California 95814

Telephone: (916) 554-2740

Attorneys for the United States

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ANTHONY ALONZO,

Plaintiff,

v.

ANTHONY PRINCIPI, Secretary of

Department of Veterans Affairs

Defendant.

No. 2:04-CV-01622-GEB-CMK-PS

APPLICATION BY DEFENDANT FOR

TIME TO FILE REPLY TO

PLAINTIFF'S OBJECTIONS TO

FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS; ORDER

Plaintiff failed to file a Opposition to Defendant's Motion For

Summary Judgment. Plaintiff, however, filed an extensive Objections

to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations granting

Defendant's Motion For Summary Judgment. Since Plaintiff's 1

///

///

Case 2:04-cv-01622-GEB-CMK Document 42 Filed 02/23/06 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations

are so extensive, Defendant requests additional time in which to

file a Reply to Plaintiff's Objections.

WHEREFORE, Defendant requests that he have until February 27,

2006 to file a Reply to Plaintiff's Objections to the Magistrate

Judge's Findings and Recommendations.

DATED: February 14, 2006 McGREGOR W. SCOTT

United States Attorney

 By: /s/ John F. Gisla 

JOHN F. GISLA

Assistant United States Attorney

Attorneys for the United States

ORDER

Pursuant to the foregoing Application, and for good cause,

Defendant has until February 27, 2006 to file a Reply to Plaintiff's

Objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations.

Dated February 22, 2006

/s/ Craig M. Kellison 

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 2:04-cv-01622-GEB-CMK Document 42 Filed 02/23/06 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3

Case 2:04-cv-01622-GEB-CMK Document 42 Filed 02/23/06 Page 3 of 3