Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_16-cv-00178/USCOURTS-caed-1_16-cv-00178-5/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Eli Lilly and Company
Plaintiff
Felicia Gitmed
Defendant
Holly Gitmed
Defendant
John Derek Gitmed
Defendant
Anthony Pollino Jr.
Defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ELI LILLY AND COMPANY, an Indiana 

corporation,

Plaintiff,

v.

JOHN DEREK GITMED, an individual; 

HOLLY GITMED, an individual; 

FELICIA GITMED, an individual; 

ANTHONY POLLINO JR., an individual; 

and DOES 1-50, inclusive,

Defendants.

No. 1:16-cv-00178-DAD-SAB

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF THE 

COURT TO TERMINATE DEFENDANT 

FELICIA GITMED FROM THIS ACTION

(Doc. No. 33)

On September 7, 2016, plaintiff Eli Lilly and Company and defendant Felicia Gitmed 

filed a joint stipulation, signed by both parties, dismissing defendant Felicia Gitmed from this 

action without prejudice, with each party to bear its own costs and attorneys’ fees. (Doc. No. 33.) 

In light of the parties’ stipulation, Felicia Gitmed has been dismissed from this action without

prejudice and without an award of attorneys’ fees and costs to either party. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 

41(a)(1)(A)(ii); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997).

/////

/////

/////

Case 1:16-cv-00178-DAD-SAB Document 34 Filed 09/14/16 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is directed to terminate defendant Felicia Gitmed 

from this action. This dismissal does not affect the status of the other defendants in the action.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 13, 2016 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:16-cv-00178-DAD-SAB Document 34 Filed 09/14/16 Page 2 of 2