Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca8-14-02490/USCOURTS-ca8-14-02490-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Mark H. Anderson
Not Party
Jane Doe
Not Party
John Doe
Not Party
Patrick R. Donahoe
Appellee
Gina Dudley
Not Party
Kim C. Squalls
Appellant

Document Text:

United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 14-2490

___________________________

Kim C. Squalls

lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant

v.

Patrick R. Donahoe, Postmaster General

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee

Gina Dudley; Mark H. Anderson; John Doe; Jane Doe

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants

____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis

____________

 Submitted: April 27, 2015

Filed: May 5, 2015

[Unpublished]

____________

Before BYE, COLLOTON, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges. 

____________

PER CURIAM.

Appellate Case: 14-2490 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/05/2015 Entry ID: 4271711 
Kim Squalls appeals the district court’s adverse grant of summary judgment

1

in her action asserting claims under Title VII and the Age Discrimination in

Employment Act (ADEA). Upon careful de novo review, see Torgerson v. City of

Rochester, 643 F.3d 1031, 1042, 1049-50 (8th Cir. 2011) (en banc) (standard of

review; discussing legal standards), we conclude that the district court did not err in

its summary judgment decision, see Gibson v. Am. Greetings Corp., 670 F.3d 844,

852-55 (8th Cir. 2012) (affirming grant of summary judgment in Title VII action;

discussing pretext); Rahlf v. Mo-Tech Corp., Inc., 642 F.3d 633, 636-40 (8th Cir.

2011) (affirming grant of summary judgment in ADEA action; discussing pretext). 

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________

The HonorableRodneyW. Sippel, United States DistrictJudge for the Eastern 1

District of Missouri.

-2-

Appellate Case: 14-2490 Page: 2 Date Filed: 05/05/2015 Entry ID: 4271711