Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_13-cv-01462/USCOURTS-caed-1_13-cv-01462-4/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
George Hamilton
Plaintiff
Unknown
Defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GEORGE HAMILTON, 

 Plaintiff,

 v.

UNKNOWN, 

Defendant.

Case No. 1:13-cv-01462-AWI-MJS (PC)

ORDER (1) DENYING MOTION FOR 

CLARIFICATION OF FINDINGS AND 

RECOMMENDATIONS, and (2) 

EXTENDING TIME TO OBJECT TO 

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

(ECF Nos. 27, 30) 

OBJECTIONS DUE NOT LATER THAN 

DECEMBER 16, 2013

This action was opened in the United States District Court for the Northern District of 

California on July 18, 2013 based upon a letter from Plaintiff, an inmate at Kern Valley 

State Prison (“KVSP”), to the Honorable Thelton E. Henderson alleging that prison staff

participated in a "pattern of racketeering activity," which has led to an "extremely dangerous 

and stressful prison environment." On September 10, 2013, the case was transferred to this 

Court. On November 12, 2013, the undersigned issued findings and recommendations 

(ECF No. 27) that Plaintiff’s motion for injunctive relief (ECF No. 11) be denied without 

prejudice. Objection to the findings and recommendations is due not later than December 

2, 2013. 

Before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion for clarification of the findings and 

recommendations (ECF No. 30).

This motion shall be denied. The Court will not issue any advisory or clarifying 

Case 1:13-cv-01462-AWI-MJS Document 33 Filed 11/25/13 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

opinion or provide advice regarding its findings and recommendations. However, the time 

for objection to the findings and recommendations will be extended to ensure Plaintiff has 

ample time to address his concerns in a proper format. Plaintiff shall assert any objections 

to the findings and recommendations by not later than December 16, 2013.

Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 

1. The motion for clarification of findings and recommendations (ECF No. 30) is 

DENIED, and 

2. The time to file objections to the findings and recommendations (ECF No. 27) 

is extended such that objections may be filed by not later than December 16, 

2013. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: November 23, 2013 /s/Michael J. Seng 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE DEAC _Signature- END:

12eob4

Case 1:13-cv-01462-AWI-MJS Document 33 Filed 11/25/13 Page 2 of 2