Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-14-02077/USCOURTS-ca4-14-02077-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
City of Petersburg
Appellee
Howard M. Fitzgerald
Appellant
Patricia A. Fitzgerald
Appellant

Document Text:

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-2077

HOWARD M. FITZGERALD; PATRICIA A. FITZGERALD,

Plaintiffs - Appellants,

v.

CITY OF PETERSBURG,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, District 

Judge. (3:14-cv-00333-HEH)

Submitted: February 12, 2015 Decided: February 18, 2015

Before MOTZ, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Howard M. and Patricia A. Fitzgerald, Appellants Pro Se. 

Maurice Scott Fisher, Jr., HARMAN, CLAYTOR, CORRIGAN & WELLMAN, 

Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 14-2077 Doc: 11 Filed: 02/18/2015 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Howard M. and Patricia A. Fitzgerald appeal the 

district court’s orders denying their motions for 

reconsideration. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e). We have reviewed 

the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm 

for the reasons stated by the district court. Fitzgerald v. 

City of Petersburg, No. 3:14-cv-00333-HEH (E.D. Va. Aug. 12, 

2014 & Sept. 9, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because 

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Appeal: 14-2077 Doc: 11 Filed: 02/18/2015 Pg: 2 of 2