Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-05238/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-05238-7/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Linda Ashley
Defendant
John Becker
Defendant
David Benoun
Defendant
City of Newark
Defendant
County of Alameda
Defendant
Karl Fredstrom
Defendant
John Patrick Henneberry
Plaintiff
Renny Lawson
Defendant
Newark Chamber of Commerce
Defendant

Document Text:

1

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL & ORDER OF DISMISSAL

13-CV-05238 MEJ

324124.1 555.35330

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

Selman Breitman LLP

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

GREGG A. THORNTON (SBN 146282)

gthornton@selmanlaw.com

DANIELLE K. LEWIS (SBN 218274)

dlewis@selmanlaw.com

SELMAN BREITMAN LLP

33 New Montgomery, Sixth Floor

San Francisco, CA 94105-4537

Telephone: 415.979.0400

Facsimile: 415.979.2099

Attorneys for Defendants

CITY OF NEWARK, JOHN BECKER,

DAVID BENOUN, KARL FREDSTROM

and RENNY LAWSON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOHN PATRICK HENNEBERRY,

Plaintiffs,

v.

CITY OF NEWARK; COUNTY OF 

ALAMEDA; NEWARK CHAMBER OF 

COMMERCE; LINDA ASHLEY; JOHN 

BECKER; DAVID BENOUN; KARL 

FREDSTROM; RENNY LAWSON; AND 

DOES 1-250,

Defendants.

Case No. 13-CV-05238 MEJ

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF 

PLAINTIFF'S CLAIMS AGAINST 

DEFENDANT DAVID BENOUN WITH 

PREJUDICE AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL OF 

SAID CLAIMS WITH PREJUDICE

[FRCP 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) and FRCP 41(a)(2)]

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between all of the parties to this action, either by 

themselves or through their designated attorneys of record, that the above-captioned action, as it 

relates to defendant DAVID BENOUN, individually, has been fully and finally resolved by way 

of a compromise settlement and release of all claims, with prejudice, and with both plaintiff 

JOHN PATRICK HENNEBERRY and defendant DAVID BENOUN each bearing their own 

attorneys' fees and litigation costs.

IT IS FURTHER HEREBY STIPULATED by and between all of the parties to this 

action, either by themselves or through their designated attorneys of record, that the abovecaptioned action, as it relates to defendant DAVID BENOUN, be and hereby is dismissed with 

prejudice, pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) and 41(a)(2), and with 

Case 3:13-cv-05238-TSH Document 65 Filed 10/22/15 Page 1 of 3
2

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL & ORDER OF DISMISSAL

13-CV-05238 MEJ

324124.1 555.35330

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

Selman Breitman LLP

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

both plaintiff JOHN PATRICK HENNEBERRY and defendant DAVID BENOUN each bearing 

their own attorneys' fees and litigation costs.

DATED: October 14, 2015 LAW OFFICES OF YOLANDA HUANG

By: /s/ Yolanda Huang _ 

Yolanda Huang, Esq.

Attorney for Plaintiff 

JOHN PATRICK HENNEBERRY

DATED: October 14, 2015 SELMAN BREITMAN LLP

By: /s/ Gregg A. Thornton _

GREGG A. THORNTON

DANIELLE K. LEWIS

Attorneys for Defendants

CITY OF NEWARK, JOHN BECKER, 

DAVID BENOUN, KARL FREDSTROM 

and RENNY LAWSON

ORDER

The parties having stipulated and agreed that the above-captioned action, as it relates to 

defendant DAVID BENOUN, individually, has been fully and finally resolved by way of a 

compromise settlement and release of all claims, with prejudice, and with both plaintiff JOHN 

PATRICK HENNEBERRY and defendant DAVID BENOUN each bearing their own attorneys' 

fees and litigation costs;

The parties having further stipulated and agreed that the above-captioned action, as it 

relates to defendant DAVID BENOUN, be and hereby is dismissed with prejudice, pursuant 

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) and 41(a)(2), and with both plaintiff JOHN 

PATRICK HENNEBERRY and defendant DAVID BENOUN each bearing their own attorneys' 

fees and litigation costs;

The Court finding good cause appearing therefor;

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above-caption action, as it relates to defendant 

Case 3:13-cv-05238-TSH Document 65 Filed 10/22/15 Page 2 of 3
3

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL & ORDER OF DISMISSAL

13-CV-05238 MEJ

324124.1 555.35330

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

Selman Breitman LLP

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

DAVID BENOUN, be and hereby is dismissed with prejudice.

Dated: _______________ By: _________________________________

Honorable Maria-Elena James

United States Magistrate Judge

Northern District of California

October 22, 2015

Case 3:13-cv-05238-TSH Document 65 Filed 10/22/15 Page 3 of 3