Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-01920/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-01920-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
T. Felkner
Defendant
Darren Henderson
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DARREN HENDERSON,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-06-1920 LKK DAD P

vs.

T. FELKNER,

Defendant. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action

seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate

Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On April 3, 2007, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein

which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the

findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Plaintiff has filed objections

to the findings and recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 72-

304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire

file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by

proper analysis.

Case 2:06-cv-01920-LKK -DAD Document 8 Filed 05/08/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed April 3, 2007, are adopted in full;

2. This action is dismissed for failure to state a cognizable claim;

3. Plaintiff’s August 25, 2006 motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is

denied; and

4. Plaintiff’s December 11, 2006 motion to compel an answer is denied.

DATED: May 7, 2007.

Case 2:06-cv-01920-LKK -DAD Document 8 Filed 05/08/07 Page 2 of 2