Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-05501/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-05501-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Heather Bartell
Plaintiff
Electronic Document Processing, Inc.
Defendant
Jay Katofsky
Defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

C:\Users\ybarras\AppData\Local\Temp\notes1A03DD\Stipulation for Extension of Time 02.24.15.wpd

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT AND TO CONTINUE FRCP

26(F) AND ADR DEADLINES AND CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; [PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON 

STEVEN B. SOLTMAN, ESQ. (SBN 108649)

STEVEN S. NIMOY, ESQ. (SBN 172310)

SOLTMAN, LEVITT, FLAHERTY & WATTLES LLP

2535 Townsgate Road, Suite 307

Westlake Village, California 91361

Telephone: (805) 497-7706

Facsimile: (805) 497-1147

E-mail: snimoy@slfesq.com

Attorneys for Defendants, ELECTRONIC

DOCUMENT PROCESSING, INC. and 

JAY KATOFSKY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

HEATHER BARTELL,

 Plaintiff,

vs.

ELECTRONIC DOCUMENT

PROCESSING, INC., A California

Corporation; JAY KATOFSKY,

individually and in his official capacity;

and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive

 Defendants. _______________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO: CV14-05501-EFL

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME

TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT AND

TO CONTINUE FRCP 26(F) AND

ADR DEADLINES AND CASE

MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE;

[PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON

 AS MODIFIED

[L.R. 6-2]

Current response date: March 3, 2015

New response date: April 9, 2015

TO THE PARTIES HEREIN AND TO THE HONORABLE COURT:

WHEREAS, Plaintiff agrees to give Defendants Electronic Document Processing, Inc.

and Jay Katofsky extended time to respond to the First Amended Complaint filed on February

24, 2015 pursuant to Local Rules of Court 6-2 requiring an extension of deadlines fixed by the

Court. 

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED among the parties hereto, by and

through their attorneys of record, James A. Michel, Esq. for the Plaintiff, and Steven S. Nimoy,

Esq., for Defendants Electronic Document Processing, Inc. and Jay Katofsky, to the following:

Case 3:14-cv-05501-RS Document 11 Filed 02/26/15 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

C:\Users\ybarras\AppData\Local\Temp\notes1A03DD\Stipulation for Extension of Time 02.24.15.wpd

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT AND TO CONTINUE FRCP

26(F) AND ADR DEADLINES AND CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; [PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON 

-2-

1. Based upon the filing of the First Amended Complaint, Defendants’ response thereto

is currently due on March 10, 2015.

2. The parties wish to initiate informal settlement discussions. The parties believe that

a thirty (30) day extension of time to respond to the complaint through April 9, 2015 will

facilitate settlement discussions and increase the possibility that this case may be resolved

quickly. 

3. The parties believe that an extension of the F.R.C.P. 26(f) and ADR deadlines, and

a continuance of the Initial Case Management Conference currently scheduled for March 17,

2015, would similarly facilitate resolution;

4. No previous agreements to extend time have been made;

5. The requested time modification would require that the Court continue the deadlines

and dates as listed in the Order Setting Initial Case Management Conference and ADR

Deadlines accordingly;

6. Pursuant to the foregoing, the parties request that the Court extend Defendants’ time

to file the response to the initial complaint to April 3, 2015 and that the Court cancel the Order

Setting Initial Case Management Conference and ADR Deadlines and issue a new Order.

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

DATED: February 25, 2015 SOLTMAN, LEVITT, FLAHERTY & WATTLES

LLP

By:: /s/ Steven S. Nimoy STEVEN S. NIMOY, ESQ.

Attorneys for Defendants,

ELECTRONIC DOCUMENT PROCESSING,

INC. and JAY KATOFSKY

Case 3:14-cv-05501-RS Document 11 Filed 02/26/15 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

C:\Users\ybarras\AppData\Local\Temp\notes1A03DD\Stipulation for Extension of Time 02.24.15.wpd

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT AND TO CONTINUE FRCP

26(F) AND ADR DEADLINES AND CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; [PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON 

-3-

DATED: February 25, 2015

By:: _/s/ James A. Michel JAMES A. MICHEL, ESQ.

Attorney for Plaintiff,

HEATHER BARTELL

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED:

Defendant Electronic Document Processing, Inc. and Jay Katofsky’s time to respond to

the complaint is extended to April 9, 2015. The Case Management Conference is continued

to April 28, 2015 at 3:00 p.m. A case management statement must be filed no later than April

21, 2015.

DATED: February 26, 2015 ___________________________________ Honorable Elizabeth D. Laporte

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:14-cv-05501-RS Document 11 Filed 02/26/15 Page 3 of 3