Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00777/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00777-5/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Bryan K. Richardson
Plaintiff
J. Sherritt
Defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BRYAN K. RICHARDSON,

Plaintiff,

vs.

C/O J. SHERRITT, 

Defendant. 

 /

1:05-cv-00777-AWI NEW (DLB) P

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS (Doc. 29)

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

DISMISS (Doc. 23)

ORDER DISMISSING ACTION

Plaintiff, Bryan K. Richardson (“plaintiff”), a state

prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, has filed this

civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The

matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant

to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72-302.

On April 10, 2007, the Magistrate Judge filed Findings and

Recommendations that recommended defendant’s motion to dismiss be

granted and this action be dismissed because plaintiff did not

exhaust administrative remedies prior to filing suit. The

Findings and Recommendations were served on the parties and

contained notice to the parties that any objections to the

Findings and Recommendations were to be filed within thirty (30)

Case 1:05-cv-00777-AWI-LJO Document 30 Filed 06/13/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

days. To date, the parties have not filed objections to the

Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C.

§ 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 73-305, this Court has conducted a

de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the

entire file, the Court finds the Findings and Recommendations to

be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed April 10, 2007,

are ADOPTED IN FULL;

2. Defendant’s motion to dismiss, filed February 14, 2007,

is GRANTED; and,

3. This action is DISMISSED for plaintiff’s failure to

exhaust administrative remedies.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 13, 2007 /s/ Anthony W. Ishii 

0m8i78 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:05-cv-00777-AWI-LJO Document 30 Filed 06/13/07 Page 2 of 2