Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_09-cv-01147/USCOURTS-cand-3_09-cv-01147-4/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Gregory Bender
Plaintiff
Broadcom Corporation
Defendant

Document Text:

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CASE NO. 3:09-CV-1147 (MHP) 

DARIN W. SNYDER (State Bar #136003), dsnyder@omm.com 

ANNE E. HUFFSMITH (State Bar #236438), ahuffsmith@omm.com 

O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP 

Two Embarcadero Center, 28th Floor 

San Francisco, California 94111-3823 

Telephone: (415) 984-8700 

Facsimile: (415) 984-8701 

Attorneys for Defendant 

BROADCOM CORPORATION 

David N. Kuhn (State Bar #73389) 

Attorney-at-Law 

144 Hagar Avenue 

Piedmont, CA 94611 

Telephone: (510) 653-4983 

E-mail: dnkuhn@pacbell.net 

Attorney for Plaintiff and Counterdefendant 

GREGORY BENDER 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

GREGORY BENDER, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

BROADCOM CORPORATION, 

Defendant. 

Case No. 3:09-cv-1147 (MHP) 

CIVIL LOCAL RULE 6-2(a) 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER 

 

WHEREAS Plaintiff Gregory Bender served his Patent Local Rule 3-1 infringement 

contentions on December 14, 2009; 

WHEREAS Defendant Broadcom Corporation contests the sufficiency of Bender’s 

infringement contentions; 

WHEREAS Broadcom and Bender have met and conferred regarding Broadcom’s 

objections to Bender’s infringement contentions; 

Case 3:09-cv-01147-MHP Document 36 Filed 01/13/10 Page 1 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER - 2 - CASE NO. 3:09-CV-1147 (MHP) 

WHEREAS Broadcom’s Patent Local Rule 3-3 and 3-4 disclosures and response to 

Bender’s complaint are currently due on January 28, 2010; 

WHEREAS Bender has agreed to provide more specific infringement contentions no later 

than January 25, 2010, and Bender and Broadcom have agreed to continue, subject to this Court’s 

approval, the dates for Broadcom’s Patent Local Rule 3-3 and 3-4 disclosures and response to 

Bender’s complaint to allow Bender to provide more specific infringement contentions and to 

resolve any disputes over those more specific infringement contentions; 

THEREFORE, pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-2(a), the parties hereby STIPULATE and 

AGREE that the deadline for Broadcom to serve its Patent Local Rule 3-3 and 3-4 disclosures and 

to respond to Bender’s complaint shall be extended by 21 days, until February 18, 2010, to allow 

the parties additional time to resolve their disagreement regarding the sufficiency of Bender’s 

infringement contentions. The Patent Local Rule 4-1, 4-2, 4-3, and 4-4 deadlines will follow 

from the modified Patent Local Rule 3-3 and 3-4 deadline. The declaration required by Civil 

Local Rule 6-2(a) is attached. (See Huffsmith Declaration.) 

Dated: January 11, 2010 

Respectfully submitted, 

By: /s/ Darin W. Snyder 

Darin W. Snyder 

O’Melveny & Myers LLP 

Counsel for Defendant 

BROADCOM CORPORATION 

Dated: January 11, 2010 By: /s/ David N. Kuhn 

David N. Kuhn 

Attorney-at-Law 

Counsel for Plaintiff 

GREGORY BENDER 

Case 3:09-cv-01147-MHP Document 36 Filed 01/13/10 Page 2 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER - 3 - CASE NO. 3:09-CV-1147 (MHP) 

Pursuant to General Order No. 45 X(B), I hereby attest that concurrence in the filing of 

this document has been obtained from each of the above-listed signatories. 

Dated: January 11, 2010 

Respectfully submitted, 

By: /s/ Anne E. Huffsmith

Anne E. Huffsmith 

O’Melveny & Myers LLP 

Counsel for Defendant 

BROADCOM CORPORATION 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION IT IS SO ORDERED: 

Dated: _________________________ _____________________________________ 

 The Honorable Marilyn Hall Patel 

 United States District Judge 

1/12/2010

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DENIED

Judge Marilyn H. Patel

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Marilyn H. Patel

Case 3:09-cv-01147-MHP Document 36 Filed 01/13/10 Page 3 of 3