Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-00716/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-00716-3/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Gene Elgery Hicks
Petitioner
Juan Salazar
Defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

U.S. District Court

 E. D. California cd 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GENE ELGERY HICKS, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

)

v. )

)

)

JUAN SALAZAR, Warden, )

)

Respondent. )

 )

1:06-CV-00716 AWI LJO HC

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND 

RECOMMENDATION 

[Doc. #6]

ORDER DISMISSING PETITION FOR WRIT

OF HABEAS CORPUS

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT

TO ENTER JUDGMENT 

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. 

On August 17, 2006, the Magistrate Judge issued a Findings and Recommendation that

recommended the petition for writ of habeas corpus be DISMISSED for Petitioner’s failure to

comply with a court order. Specifically, Petitioner failed to pay the filing fee within the thirty (30)

days allotted by the District Court on June 27, 2006. Petitioner filed objections to the Findings and

Recommendation requesting additional time to comply. Therefore, on September 7, 2006, the

Magistrate Judge granted Petitioner an additional thirty (30) days to comply. Petitioner was

forewarned that failure to comply would result in dismissal. Nevertheless, over thirty (30) days have

Case 1:06-cv-00716-AWI-LJO Document 10 Filed 11/20/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

U.S. District Court

 E. D. California cd 2

since passed and Petitioner has not complied or otherwise responded to the order.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a de

novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds that the Findings

and Recommendation is supported by the record and proper analysis. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendation issued August 17, 2006, is ADOPTED IN FULL; 

2. The petition for writ of habeas corpus is DISMISSED without prejudice; and

3. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to enter judgment.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: November 19, 2006 /s/ Anthony W. Ishii 

0m8i78 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-00716-AWI-LJO Document 10 Filed 11/20/06 Page 2 of 2