Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-03637/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-03637-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Clark Ducart
Respondent
Rojelio A. Guillen
Petitioner

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ROJELIO A. GUILLEN,

Petitioner,

v.

CLARK DUCART,

Respondent.

Case No. 16-cv-03637-WHO (PR) 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

Dkt. No. 2

Petitioner Rojelio Guillen failed to comply with the Court’s order to (1) file a 

complete application to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”), or (2) pay the filing fee of 

$5.00. Accordingly, this federal habeas action is DISMISSED without prejudice for 

failing to respond to the Court’s order, and for failure to prosecute, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 

41(b). Because this dismissal is without prejudice, Guillen may move to reopen the action. 

Any such motion must contain (1) a complete IFP application, or (2) full payment for the 

$5.00 filing fee. 

Guillen’s motion to proceed IFP (Dkt. No. 2) is DENIED as insufficient.

The Clerk shall terminate Dkt. No. 2, enter judgment in favor of respondent, and 

close the file.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 8, 2016

_________________________

WILLIAM H. ORRICK

United States District Judge

Case 3:16-cv-03637-WHO Document 7 Filed 08/08/16 Page 1 of 1