Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-00621/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-00621-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Casey L. Hacker
Plaintiff
Michael R. Hacker
Defendant

Document Text:

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

CASEY L. HACKER, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

MICHAEL R. HACKER, 

Defendant. 

No. 2:15-cv-00621-TLN-AC 

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE 

 This matter is before the undersigned pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). Plaintiff’s 

complaint, filed on March 19, 2015, includes claims against defendant for fraud and breach of 

contract. ECF No. 1. On June 11, 2015, defendant filed a motion to dismiss plaintiff’s 

complaint, with a hearing scheduled for July 9, 2015. ECF No. 4. On the same day, the court 

continued the hearing to July 22, 2015. ECF No. 5. Pursuant to Local Rule 230(c), plaintiff was 

required to file an opposition or notice of non-opposition by July 8, 2015. Plaintiff has yet to file 

either an opposition or notice of non-opposition. 

 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 

1. Plaintiff shall show cause in writing within fourteen (14) days of the date of this order 

why this action should not be dismissed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) 

for failure to prosecute; and

//// 

Case 2:15-cv-00621-TLN-AC Document 6 Filed 07/20/15 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2

2. The court’s July 22, 2015, hearing on defendant’s motion to dismiss is VACATED.

DATED: July 20, 2015 

Case 2:15-cv-00621-TLN-AC Document 6 Filed 07/20/15 Page 2 of 2