Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_07-cv-05136/USCOURTS-cand-4_07-cv-05136-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Padam Kumar Khanna
Plaintiff
Baljit Randhawa
Defendant
Jagjit Singh Randhawa
Defendant

Document Text:

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

PADAM KUMAR KHANNA,

Plaintiff,

v.

THE STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA, et al.,

Defendants.

___________________________________/

PADAM KUMAR KHANNA,

Plaintiff,

v.

JAGJIT SINGH RANDHAWA, et al.,

Defendants.

___________________________________/

No. C-07-2587 EMC

ORDER SETTING BRIEFING

SCHEDULE FOR PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT

OR, ALTERNATIVELY, REQUIRING

PLAINTIFF TO SHOW CAUSE

RELATED TO

No. C-07-5136 EMC

Previously, this Court issued an order in Case No. C-07-2587 EMC severing Plaintiff Padam

Kumar Khanna’s claims against Defendants Jagit and Baljit Randhawa from the claims against the

remaining Defendants. Mr. Khanna’s claims against the Randhawas have now been assigned a new

case number (as referenced above), and the Court has related the instant case to Case No. C-07-2587

EMC.

No activity has occurred with respect to Mr. Khanna’s claims against the Randhawas since

the Clerk of the Court entered default against them on July 24, 2007. See Case No. C-07-2587

Case 4:07-cv-05136-CW Document 3 Filed 10/11/07 Page 1 of 4
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

EMC, Docket No. 23. In order to move this case forward, the Court hereby orders Mr. Khanna to

file by November 1, 2007 a motion for default judgment against the Randhawas or, alternatively,

show cause why the claims against the Randhawas should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute.

Mr. Khanna is directed to serve a copy of this order on Jagjit Randhawa and Baljit Randhawa

forthwith, with a Certificate of Service to be filed with the Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 11, 2007

_________________________ EDWARD M. CHEN

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 4:07-cv-05136-CW Document 3 Filed 10/11/07 Page 2 of 4
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

PADAM KUMAR KHANNA,

Plaintiff,

v.

THE STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA, et al.,

Defendants.

___________________________________/

PADAM KUMAR KHANNA,

Plaintiff,

v.

JAGJIT SINGH RANDHAWA, et al.,

Defendants.

___________________________________/

No. C-07-2587 EMC

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

RELATED TO

No. C-07-5136 EMC

I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the U.S. District Court, Northern

District of California. On the below date, I served a true and correct copy of the attached, by placing

said copy/copies in a postage-paid envelope addressed to the person(s) listed below, by depositing

said envelope in the U.S. Mail; or by placing said copy/copies into an inter-office delivery

receptacle located in the Office of the Clerk.

Case 4:07-cv-05136-CW Document 3 Filed 10/11/07 Page 3 of 4
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

4

Padam Kumar Khanna

Khanna & Narain

2600 10th Street

Berkeley, CA 94710-2522

Dated: October 11, 2007 RICHARD W. WIEKING, CLERK

By: /s/ 

Leni Doyle

Deputy Clerk

Case 4:07-cv-05136-CW Document 3 Filed 10/11/07 Page 4 of 4