Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-00635/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-00635-6/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Doyle Dean Hartline
Plaintiff
National University
Defendant

Document Text:

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

DOYLE DEAN HARTLINE, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

NATIONAL UNIVERSITY, 

Defendant. 

No. 2:14-cv-0635 KJM AC (PS) 

ORDER 

 Plaintiff is proceeding in this action in pro per and in forma pauperis. The matter was 

referred to a United States Magistrate Judge under Local Rule 302(c)(21). 

 On August 7, 2015, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which were 

served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings 

and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. ECF No. 43. Defendant has filed 

objections to the findings and recommendations. ECF No. 46. Plaintiff also has filed objections 

to the findings and recommendations. ECF No. 50. 

 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this 

court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the 

court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper 

analysis. 

//// 

Case 2:14-cv-00635-KJM-AC Document 55 Filed 02/04/16 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2

 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 

 1. The findings and recommendations filed August 7, 2015 are adopted in full; and 

 2. Defendant’s motion to dismiss (ECF No. 32) is GRANTED as follows: 

 a. GRANTED with prejudice as to Counts 1 through 4 (ADA and RA claims), on 

statute of limitations grounds; 

 b. GRANTED without prejudice, as to Count 5 (RA Claim), and plaintiff is 

granted LEAVE TO AMEND within 30 days if he can plead facts establishing that he has 

standing, as discussed in the findings and recommendations; 

 c. GRANTED with prejudice as to Counts 6 and 7 (Age Discrimination Act 

claims), for failure to exhaust administrative remedies; 

 d. GRANTED with prejudice as to Counts 8 through 10 (“Due Process” claims), 

for failure to state a claim; 

 e. GRANTED with prejudice as to Count 11 (“reckless endangerment” claim), for 

failure to state a claim; 

 f. GRANTED with prejudice as to Count 12 (fraud claim), insofar as it is based on 

plaintiff’s placement in student teaching jobs, on statute of limitations grounds; 

 g. GRANTED without prejudice as to Count 12 (fraud claim), insofar as it is 

based on alleged misrepresentations of defendant’s prior experience with disabled students, and 

plaintiff is granted LEAVE TO AMEND this claim within 30 days; and 

 h. GRANTED with prejudice as to Count 13 (personal injury claim). 

DATED: February 3, 2016 

Case 2:14-cv-00635-KJM-AC Document 55 Filed 02/04/16 Page 2 of 2