Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_23-cr-00150/USCOURTS-caed-2_23-cr-00150-22/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Jazzmine Campbell
Defendant
Reginald Jones
Defendant
Marcus Miller
Defendant
Felicia Shaw
Defendant
USA
Plaintiff
Jimmy Van II
Defendant

Document Text:

-1-

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

MICHAEL D. LONG (CA State Bar #149475) 

901 H Street, Suite 231 

Sacramento, CA 95814 

(916) 201-4188 

Mike.Long.Law@msn.com 

Attorney for MARCUS MILLER 

 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

 

THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) No. 2:23-150 DJC 

 Plaintiff, ) 

 ) STIPULATION AND ORDER 

 v. ) TO CONTINUE STATUS HEARING 

 ) 

MARCUS MILLER, ) 

REGINALD JONES, ) Requested date: 1-23-2025 

FELICIA SHAW, ) Time: 9:00 a.m. 

JIMMY VAN II and ) Judge: Hon. Daniel J. Calabretta 

JAZZMINE CAMPBELL, ) 

 Defendants. ) 

================================) 

 It is hereby stipulated between the parties, Alexis Klein, Assistant United States Attorney, 

Michael D. Long, attorney for defendant MARCUS MILLER, David Fischer, attorney for defendant 

REGINALD JONES, Philip Cozens, attorney for defendant FELICIA SHAW, and Kyle Knapp, 

attorney for defendant JAZZMINE CAMPBELL, that the status hearing set for December 19, 2024, 

at 9:00 a.m., before Judge Daniel J. Calabretta, should be continued and re-set for January 23, 2025, 

at 9:00 a.m., before Judge Calabretta. 

 Defendant JIMMY VAN II is not a part of this stipulation. His status hearing will remain set 

for December 19, 2024, at 9:00 a.m., before Judge Daniel J. Calabretta. 

 Other than Mr. VAN II, each party has agreed to move the status hearing, with the Court’s 

permission, to January 23, 2025. All parties are available to appear, and they all agree to appear in 

Case 2:23-cr-00150-DJC Document 118 Filed 12/04/24 Page 1 of 4
-2-

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

court in-person (unless the defendant has an approved waiver of appearance on file with the court) on 

January 23, 2025. 

 The parties further agree that this court should make a finding of good cause for the requested 

extension and that in fact good cause is hereby shown. The government has provided defense counsel 

with external hard drives containing thousands of pages of discovery and many phone calls, 

photographs and videos concerning alleged narcotics activity. All attorneys continue to read and view 

the discovery, investigate the case and meet with their respective clients. The discovery was 

accompanied by a protective order, so the attorneys cannot simply give a copy of discovery to the 

clients. Defendants cannot review discovery unless in the presence of the attorneys or investigators. 

Counsel for defendants believe that failure to grant the above-requested continuance would deny 

counsel the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise 

of due diligence. 

 Each party further stipulates that the ends of justice served by granting such continuance 

outweigh the best interests of the public and of all the defendants in a speedy trial. Time has already 

been excluded through December 19, 2024. 

 The request for extending the date for the status conference is at the specific request of each 

of the defendants and with the knowing, intelligent and voluntary waiver of each defendant’s speedy 

trial rights under the law. The government agrees that a continuance is necessary. Good cause is 

hereby shown. 

For the purpose of computing time under the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161, et seq., 

within which trial must commence, the time period from today’s date to January 23, 2025, 

inclusive, is deemed excludable pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 3161(h)(7)(A), B(iv) [Local Code T4] 

because it results from a continuance granted by the Court at defendants’ request on the basis of 

Case 2:23-cr-00150-DJC Document 118 Filed 12/04/24 Page 2 of 4
-3-

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

the Court’s finding that the ends of justice served by taking such action outweigh the best interest 

of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. 

Dated: December 3, 2024 Respectfully submitted, 

 /s/ Michael D. Long__________

 MICHAEL D. LONG 

 Attorney for MARCUS MILLER 

 /s/ David Fischer __________

 DAVID FISCHER 

 Attorney for REGINALD DONES 

 /s/ Philip Cozens__________

 PHILIP COZENS 

 Attorney for FELISHA SHAW 

 /s/ Kyle Knapp__________

 KYLE KNAPP 

 Attorney for JAZZMINE CAMPBELL 

Dated: December 3, 2024 PHILLIP TALBERT 

 United States Attorney 

 /s/ Alexis Klein________

 ALEXIS KLEIN 

 Assistant U.S. Attorney 

/// 

/// 

/// 

/// 

/// 

/// 

Case 2:23-cr-00150-DJC Document 118 Filed 12/04/24 Page 3 of 4
-4-

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 ORDER 

 

GOOD CAUSE APPEARING AND HAVING BEEN SHOWN, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

The date for the status hearing in this matter is hereby re-set for January 23, 2025, at 9:00 

a.m., before District Court Judge Daniel J. Calabretta. 

Time is is deemed excludable pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 3161(h)(7)(A), B(iv) [Local Code 

T4] because it results from a continuance granted by the Court at defendants’ request on the basis 

of the Court’s finding that the ends of justice served by taking such action outweigh the best 

interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. Time is excluded through the new 

hearing date of January 23, 2025. 

Dated: December 4, 2024 /s/ Daniel J. Calabretta 

 THE HONORABLE DANIEL J. CALABRETTA 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 2:23-cr-00150-DJC Document 118 Filed 12/04/24 Page 4 of 4