Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cr-00375/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cr-00375-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Jorge Estrada
Defendant
USA
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER 1

CR 06-0375 SI

KEVIN V. RYAN (CSBN 118321)

United States Attorney

MARK L. KROTOSKI (CABN 138549) 

Chief, Criminal Division

NAHLA RAJAN (CSBN 218838)

Special Assistant United States Attorney

450 Golden Gate Avenue, Box 36055

San Francisco, California 94102-3495

Telephone: (415) 436-6838

FAX: (415) 436-7234

Email: nahla.rajan@usdoj.gov

Attorneys for Plaintiff

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

JORGE ESTRADA,

Defendant.

 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

) 

No. CR 06-0375 SI

 (CR 01-0389 SI

 CR 00-0306 SI)

[PROPOSED] ORDER AND

STIPULATION EXCLUDING TIME

FROM THE SPEEDY TRIAL ACT

CALCULATION 

(18 U.S.C. § 3161 (h)(8)(A))

The parties stipulate and agree, and the Court finds and holds, as follows:

1. The parties appeared on the instant matter May 24, 2006 for defendant’s arraignment

on the indictment before the Honorable Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte. On May 24, 2006, the

matter was continued to June 2, 2006 for initial appearance in front of the Honorable Susan

Illston. On June 2, 2006, the parties appeared in front of the Honorable Susan Illston and the

matter was continued to June 23, 2006 for status / trial setting. On June 23, 2006, the matter was

continued to July 6, 2006 for a Supervised Release Violation Hearing on the defendant’s 00-0306

and 01-0389 cases.

Case 3:06-cr-00375-SI Document 12 Filed 07/11/2006 Page 1 of 2
 Case 3:06-cr-00375-SI Document 13 Filed 07/14/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER 2

CR 06-0375 SI

2. On July 6, 2006, the parties appeared in front of the Honorable Susan Illston and the

matter was continued to August 11, 2006 for status / trial setting.

3. On July 6, 2006, Assistant Federal Public Defender Elizabeth Falk, who represents the

defendant, requested an exclusion of time from July 6, 2006 to August 11, 2006, based on

continuity and effective preparation of counsel. The parties moved that this same time period be

excluded from the calculation of time under the Speedy Trial Act.

4. In light of the foregoing facts, the failure to grant the requested exclusion would

unreasonably deny counsel for the defense the reasonable time necessary for effective

preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. See 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(A),

(B)(iv). The ends of justice would be served by the Court excluding the proposed time period. 

These ends outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. See id. §

3161(h)(8)(A).

4. For the reasons stated, the time period from July 6, 2006 through August 11, 2006

shall be excluded from the calculation of time under the Speedy Trial Act.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

DATED: July 6, 2006 Respectfully Submitted,

 /S/ 

NAHLA RAJAN

Special Assistant United States Attorney

DATED: July 10, 2006 /S/ 

ELIZABETH M. FALK

Counsel for Jorge Estrada

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: _________________ ____________________________________

HONORABLE SUSAN ILLSTON

United States District Judge

Case 3:06-cr-00375-SI Document 12 Filed 07/11/2006 Page 2 of 2
 Case 3:06-cr-00375-SI Document 13 Filed 07/14/06 Page 2 of 2