Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_24-cv-02386/USCOURTS-caed-2_24-cv-02386-2/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Commissioner of Social Security
Defendant
Barbie Kay Humphrey
Plaintiff

Document Text:

STIPULATION TO REMAND; 2:24-cv-02386-CSK

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

PHILLIP A. TALBERT

United States Attorney

MATHEW W. PILE

Associate General Counsel 

Office of Program Litigation, Office 7

JUSTIN L. MARTIN, Missouri State Bar No. 62255

Special Assistant United States Attorney

Office of Program Litigation, Office 7

Office of the General Counsel

Social Security Administration

6401 Security Boulevard

Baltimore, MD 21235-6401

Telephone: (206) 615-3735

Email: Justin.L.Martin@ssa.gov

Attorneys for Defendant

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SACREMENTO DIVISION

BARBIE KAY HUMPHREY, 

Plaintiff,

v.

MARTIN O’MALLEY,

Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CIVIL NO. 2:24-cv-02386-CSK

STIPULATION TO VOLUNTARY 

REMAND PURSUANT TO SENTENCE 

FOUR OF 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) AND TO 

ENTRY OF JUDGMENT; [PROPOSED] 

ORDER

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties, through their undersigned 

attorneys, and with the approval of the Court, that this action be remanded for further 

administrative action pursuant to the Social Security Act § 205(g), as amended, 42 U.S.C. 

§ 405(g), sentence four. On remand, the Appeals Council will remand the case to an 

administrative law judge (ALJ) with instructions to reevaluate Plaintiff’s subjective complaints; 

reevaluate Plaintiff’s residual functional capacity; as needed, continue the sequential evaluation 

process and obtain vocational expert testimony, if warranted; take action to further develop the 

Case 2:24-cv-02386-CSK Document 13 Filed 11/21/24 Page 1 of 2
STIPULATION TO REMAND; 2:24-cv-02386-CSK

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

record, as necessary; offer Plaintiff the opportunity for a hearing; and issue a new decision.

The parties further request that the Court direct the Clerk of the Court to enter a final 

judgment in favor of Plaintiff, and against Defendant, reversing the final decision of the 

Commissioner.

Respectfully submitted, 

DATE: November 19, 2024 /s/ Francesco Paulo Benavides*

FRANCESCO PAULO BENAVIDES

Attorney for Plaintiff

*Authorized via e-mail on November 19, 2024

PHILLIP A. TALBERT

United States Attorney

MATHEW W. PILE

Associate General Counsel

Office of Program Litigation, Office 7

DATE: November 19, 2024 By: /s/ Justin L. Martin 

JUSTIN L. MARTIN

Special Assistant United States Attorney

Office of Program Litigation, Office 7

Attorneys for Defendant

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Based upon the parties’ stipulation to Voluntary Remand Pursuant to Sentence Four of 42 

U.S.C. § 405(g) and to Entry of Judgment, and for cause shown, IT IS ORDERED that the 

above-captioned action is remanded to the Commissioner of Social Security for further 

proceedings pursuant to the Social Security Act § 205(g), as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), 

sentence four. On remand, the Appeals Council will remand the case to an administrative law 

judge for a new decision in accordance with the parties’ Stipulation.

DATED: November 21, 2024

HON. CHI SOO KIM

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

5, hump.2386.24

Case 2:24-cv-02386-CSK Document 13 Filed 11/21/24 Page 2 of 2