Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-04349/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-04349-2/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
ICE Consulting, Inc.
Counter-defendant
Gavin Jensen
Counter-claimant
Derick Needham
Plaintiff
Uzair Sattar
Counter-defendant

Document Text:

Case No. 3:16-cv-04349-EMC

STIPULATION BY ALL PARTIES EXTENDING TIME FOR PLAINTIFFS TO RESPOND TO

DEFENDANT’S COUNTERCLAIMS AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

26674193.v1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

NOSSAMAN LLP

VERONICA M. GRAY (SBN 72572)

vgray@nossaman.com

ANDREW C. CRANE (SBN 285211)

acrane@nossaman.com

18101 Von Karman Avenue, Suite 1800

Irvine, CA 92612

Telephone: 949.833.7800

Facsimile: 949.833.7878

S. ASHAR AHMED (SBN 256711)

aahmed@nossaman.com

50 California Street, 34th Floor

San Francisco, CA 94111

Telephone: 415.398.3600

Facsimile: 415.398.2438

Attorneys for Plaintiffs and Counter-Defendants

ICE Consulting, Inc.; Uzair Sattar;

and Derick Needham

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

ICE CONSULTING, INC., UZAIR

SATTAR, and DERICK NEEDHAM

Plaintiffs and CounterDefendants,

vs.

GAVIN JENSEN,

Defendant and CounterClaimant.

Case No: 3:16-cv-04349-EMC

STIPULATION BY ALL PARTIES

EXTENDING TIME FOR

PLAINTIFFS TO RESPOND TO

DEFENDANT’S

COUNTERCLAIMS AND

[PROPOSED] ORDER

[LOCAL RULE 6-2]

Counterclaims Filed: Sept. 16, 2016

Counterclaims Served: Sept. 16, 2016

Initial Response Date: Oct. 11, 2016

New Date to Respond: Oct. 25, 2016

Trial: Not Set

Case 3:16-cv-04349-EMC Document 72 Filed 10/11/16 Page 1 of 3
- 1 - Case No. 3:16-cv-04349-EMC

STIPULATION BY ALL PARTIES EXTENDING TIME FOR PLAINTIFFS TO RESPOND TO

DEFENDANT’S COUNTERCLAIMS AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

26674193.v1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(a)(1) and Local Rule 6-2

and 8-3, Plaintiffs ICE Consulting, Inc., Uzair Sattar, and Derick Needham

(collectively, “Plaintiffs”), and Defendant Gavin Jensen (“Defendant”)

(collectively, the “Parties”), by and through their respective counsel, hereby enter

into this Stipulation Extending Time For Plaintiffs to Respond to Defendant’s

Counterclaims. This Stipulation is based on the contents of this stipulation and the

Declaration of Andrew C. Crane (“Crane Dec.”), filed concurrently herewith.

WHEREAS, on September 16, 2016, Defendant filed an Answer and

Counterclaims to Plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint (Dkt. No. 62). Crane Dec.,

¶ 2.

WHEREAS, at the September 15, 2016 Motion for Preliminary Injunction

hearing, the Court ordered the Parties to commence settlement discussions

forthwith. Crane Dec., ¶ 3.

WHEREAS, the Parties are currently engaged in settlement discussions per

the Court’s instruction. Crane Dec., ¶ 3.

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs’ response to Defendant’s Counterclaims is due on

October 11, 2016. Crane Dec., ¶ 4.

WHEREAS, the Parties wish to continue focusing exclusively on settlement

negotiations before incurring any additional expense. Crane Dec., ¶ 4.

WHEREAS, there have been no previous time modifications in this case.

Crane Dec., ¶ 5.

WHEREAS, the Court has set the Case Management Conference in this

matter for November 8, 2016. Crane Dec., ¶ 6.

WHEREAS, the extension sought by this Stipulation will not affect the

schedule for this case. Crane Dec., ¶ 6.

Case 3:16-cv-04349-EMC Document 72 Filed 10/11/16 Page 2 of 3
- 2 - Case No. 3:16-cv-04349-EMC

STIPULATION BY ALL PARTIES EXTENDING TIME FOR PLAINTIFFS TO RESPOND TO

DEFENDANT’S COUNTERCLAIMS AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

26674193.v1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

THEREFORE, THE PARTIES HEREBY STIPULATE:

That Plaintiffs’ deadline to respond to Defendant’s Counterclaims shall be

extended to October 25, 2016.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Date: October 7, 2016

NOSSAMAN LLP

VERONICA M. GRAY

ANDREW C. CRANE

By: /s/ Andrew C. Crane

Andrew C. Crane

Attorneys for Plaintiffs and CounterDefendants

ICE Consulting, Inc.; Uzair Sattar;

and Derick Needham

Date: October 7, 2016

DHILLON LAW GROUP INC

By: /s/ Nitoj P. Singh

Nitoj P. Singh

Attorneys for Defendant and CounterClaimant

Gavin Jensen

ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

_________________________________

Hon. Edward M. Chen

United States District Judge U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Edward M. Chen

Case 3:16-cv-04349-EMC Document 72 Filed 10/11/16 Page 3 of 3