Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_15-cv-00657/USCOURTS-cand-4_15-cv-00657-11/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Best Buy Stores, L.P.
Defendant
Starvona Harris
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

STARVONA HARRIS,

Plaintiff,

v.

BEST BUY STORES, L.P.,

Defendant.

Case No. 15-cv-00657-HSG (KAW)

ORDER TERMINATING JOINT 

DISCOVERY LETTER BRIEFS

Re: Dkt. Nos. 78, 79

The parties to this proposed class action filed two joint discovery letter briefs on March 31, 

2016. (Dkt. Nos. 78, 79.) One joint letter concerns whether good cause exists to reopen discovery 

regarding Plaintiff's alleged misuse of Best Buy's employee discount policy. (Dkt. No. 79.) The 

other joint letter concerns whether Harris should be compelled to produce her phone records in 

light of her allegation that she used her personal cell phone to make work-related calls and that 

Best Buy was required to reimburse her for cell phone expenses under California Labor Code 

section 2802. (Dkt. No. 78.) Discovery regarding individual claims closed on February 15, 2016. 

(Dkt. No. 58.) For this reason, the parties' joint discovery letters are untimely. See Civil L.R. 37-

3. To the extent Best Buy seeks leave to conduct further discovery on Plaintiff's individual claims, 

it must seek such leave from the presiding judge.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated:

__________________________________

KANDIS A. WESTMORE

United States Magistrate Judge

04/12/2016

Case 4:15-cv-00657-HSG Document 80 Filed 04/12/16 Page 1 of 1