Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-02026/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-02026-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Jo Anne B. Barnhart
Defendant
Boon Hakchaleun
Plaintiff

Document Text:

U

nite

d

States District C

o

u

rt

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

U

nite

d

States District C

o

u

rt

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BOON HAKCHALEUN,

Plaintiff,

 v.

JO ANNE B. BARNHART,

Defendant.

 /

No. C 04-02026 CRB

ORDER REINSTATING CASE

On February 11, 2005, the Court, pursuant to a stipulation by the parties and Sentence

6 of 42 U.S.C. section 405(g), remanded the case to the Commissioner in order to reconstruct

the case because plaintiff’s claim file and the recording of his hearing were missing. Now

pending before the Court is defendant’s Request to Vacate Remand, Reinstate Case, and

Answer because defendant avers that the missing items have been located. Based on that

representation, the Court hereby VACATES remand and REINSTATES the case. Pursuant

to Local Rule 16-5, plaintiff must file a motion for summary judgment no later than March 2,

2006. Defendant must then file any opposition or counter-motion within 30 days of

plaintiff’s motion, and plaintiff has 14 days from service of defendant’s brief to file a reply. 

//

//

//

Case 3:04-cv-02026-CRB Document 18 Filed 02/02/06 Page 1 of 2
U

nite

d

States District C

o

u

rt

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

G:\CRBALL\2004\2026\order reinstating case.wpd 2

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 2, 2006 

 

CHARLES R. BREYER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:04-cv-02026-CRB Document 18 Filed 02/02/06 Page 2 of 2