Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-07817/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-07817-3/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Karam Singh Badesha
Plaintiff
Cap Re of Vermont, Inc.
Defendant
Felicia Folmar
Plaintiff
GMAC LLC
Defendant
Lori Garrett
Plaintiff
Donna Moore
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

REVISED STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER C06-07817

sf-2291362

MICHAEL J. AGOGLIA (CA SBN 154810)

WENDY M. GARBERS (CA SBN 213208)

RITA F. LIN (CA SBN 236220)

MAgoglia@mofo.com

MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP

425 Market Street

San Francisco, California 94105-2482

Telephone: 415.268.7000

Facsimile: 415.268.7522

Attorneys for Defendants

GMAC LLC, CAP RE OF VERMONT, INC.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

KARAM SINGH BADESHA, FELICIA 

FOLMAR, LORI GARRETT, and DONNA 

MOORE, individually and on behalf of all other 

similarly situated,,

Plaintiffs,

v.

GMAC LLC, CAP RE OF VERMONT, INC.,

Defendants.

Case No. C06-07817

REVISED STIPULATION AND 

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

VACATING CASE DEADLINES

Case 3:06-cv-07817-JCS Document 33 Filed 03/28/2007 Page 1 of 3
 Case 3:06-cv-07817-JCS Document 35 Filed 03/29/07 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

REVISED STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER C06-07817

sf-2291362

1

Whereas plaintiffs Karam Singh Badesha, Felicia Folmar, Lori Garrett and Donna Moore 

(collectively, “plaintiffs”) and defendants GMAC LLC and Cap Re of Vermont, Inc. 

(collectively, “defendants”) are meeting and conferring in good faith to resolve threshold issues 

regarding the initial pleadings in an effort to avoid needless motion practice;

Whereas those discussions are ongoing and require the parties to develop and informally 

exchange additional factual information;

Whereas the parties believe that judicial economy would be better served by postponing 

initial disclosures, the case management conference, and responsive pleading deadlines until the 

initial pleadings are further settled;

Whereas the only previous time modification in this case was to extend the time for 

defendants to respond to the complaint from February 15, 2007 to March 30, 2007, because 

defendants had been previously represented by different counsel and had only recently retained 

their current counsel, 

Accordingly, the parties, through their respective attorneys, hereby stipulate and request 

that the Court enter an order as follows:

1. Plaintiffs shall file and serve an amended complaint on or before May 18, 2007;

2. Defendants shall file and serve responsive pleadings on or before June 22, 2007;

3. If either of the defendants’ responses to the amended complaint is a motion, the 

parties will meet and confer regarding a briefing schedule on such motion(s) and submit their 

proposed schedule to the Court for approval;

4. The currently pending deadlines in the case — the initial disclosures deadline on 

March 23, 2007, the case management conference on March 30, 2007, and defendants’ 

responsive pleading deadline to the original complaint on March 30, 2007 — shall be 

vacated; the case management conference shall be reset to July 13, 2007, at 1:30 p.m.;

5. The parties shall exchange initial disclosures on or before June 15, 2007. The 

parties shall conduct a Rule 26(f) conference on or before June 29, 2007. The parties shall

submit a joint case management statement meeting the requirements of Local Rule 16-9 on or 

Case 3:06-cv-07817-JCS Document 33 Filed 03/28/2007 Page 2 of 3

July 27, 2007

Case 3:06-cv-07817-JCS Document 35 Filed 03/29/07 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

REVISED STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER C06-07817 2

sf-2291362

before July 6, 2007. Nothing in this Order shall be construed to affect the parties’ rights to 

take discovery from parties or nonparties.

Dated: March 28, 2007 MICHAEL J. AGOGLIA

WENDY M. GARBERS

RITA F. LIN

MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP

By: /s/ Wendy M. Garbers

Wendy M. Garbers

Attorneys for Defendants

GMAC LLC, CAP RE OF VERMONT, 

INC.

Dated: March 28, 2007 ALAN R. PLUTZIK

ROBERT M. BRAMSON

JOSEPH H. MELTZER

EDWARD W. CIOLKO

JOSEPH A. WEEDEN

SCHIFFRIN & BARROWAY LLP

By: /s/ Alan R. Plutzik

Alan R. Plutzik

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Pursuant to stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: _______________

___________________________________ The Honorable Joseph C. Spero

ECF CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to General Order No. 45, § X.B., the filing attorney attests that she has obtained 

concurrence regarding the filing of this document from the signatory to the document.

By: /s/Wendy M. Garbers

Wendy M. Garbers

Case 3:06-cv-07817-JCS Document 33 Filed 03/28/2007 Page 3 of 3

July 20, 2007 AS AMENDED March 29, 2007

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

Judge Joseph C. Spero

Case 3:06-cv-07817-JCS Document 35 Filed 03/29/07 Page 3 of 3