Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cr-00182/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cr-00182-18/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Julie Lee
Defendant
USA
Plaintiff

Document Text:

-1- 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

DONALD THOMAS BERGERSON CSB No. 91263 

34 Boardman Place,San Francisco, CA., 94103 

Telephone: (415) 621-8149 

Facsimile : (415) 920-9288 

Attorney for Defendant, JULIE LEE 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO VENUE 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff,

 Vs. 

JULIE LEE, 

 Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 2:05-CR-182-LKK 

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE HEARING 

AND ORDER TO CONTINUE HEARING 

On the request of counsel for Lee, the parties STIPULATE 

that the status/setting hearing now set for October 11, 2006 at 

9:30 a.m. may and shall be continued to October 24, 2006 at 9:30 

a.m. The continuance is occasioned by defense counsel’s need to 

prepare, which entails review by him of thousands of pages of 

discovery in this case, which review is necessary to assure 

continuity of representation to Lee1

. Counsel for the Government 

 

1 Since the time of the last stipulation, counsel’s task has been 

hampered by an unanticipated development. In early September, he was 

notified by the county of San Francisco that he immediately had to 

vacate his home-and-office which he had occupied for six years, on 

grounds that the same was not in compliance with local building codes. 

Because counsel had rented the space through a real estate company, he 

did not realize that the unit was “illegal”, and the ouster came as a 

surprise to him. Needless to say, the sudden move was extremely 

Case 2:05-cr-00182-LKK Document 63 Filed 10/10/06 Page 1 of 2
-2- 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

authorizes defense counsel to sign this stipulation on behalf of 

counsel for the Government. Defendant need not appear on October 

11, 2006 at the vacated hearing. Time under the Speedy Trial Act 

is excluded for purposes of continuity of representation by 

counsel and counsel’s need to prepare, pursuant to local code T4. 

 

 DATED: October 6, 2006 

//s// John Vincent 

___________________________________ 

JOHN VINCENT, ASST. U.S. ATTTORNEY 

 

 DATED: October 6, 2006 

//s// Donald Thomas Bergerson 

___________________________________ 

DONALD THOMAS BERGERSON 

ORDER FOR CONTINUANCE OF HEARING 

 SO ORDERED. 

 DATED: October 6, 2006 

 

disruptive, and made it impossible for counsel to conduct business for 

several weeks. 

Case 2:05-cr-00182-LKK Document 63 Filed 10/10/06 Page 2 of 2