Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-00243/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-00243-3/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
E. C.
Plaintiff
County of Yolo
Defendant
Lindsey Shamberger
Plaintiff
Dana Tello
Defendant

Document Text:

Stipulation and [Proposed] Order to Continue Hearing on Defendant’s Motion for Summary 

Judgment, or in the alternative Summary Adjudication

Page - 1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

LONGYEAR, O’DEA & LAVRA, LLP

John A. Lavra, CSB No.: 114533

3620 American River Drive, Suite 230

Sacramento, CA 95864

Phone: 916-974-8500

Facsimile: 916-974-8510

Attorneys for County of Yolo and

Dana Tello

Harry D. Roth - SBN 80611

Attorneys at Law

808 East Eighth St.

Davis, California 95616

(530) 756-1265

Fax (530) 231-2816

Attorney for Plaintiffs

Lindsey Shamberger and Minor Son

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION 

LINDSEY SHAMBERGER, as an 

individual and on behalf of her minor son, 

EC,

Plaintiff,

vs.

DANA TELLO and COUNTY OF YOLO,

Defendant

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: 2:14-cv-00243-WBS-DAD

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER TO CONTINUE HEARING ON 

DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR 

SUMMARY JUDGMENT, OR IN THE 

ALTERNATIVE SUMMARY 

ADJUDICATION

 COMES NOW THE PARTIES by and through their respective counsel and subject to 

the approval of this Court, hereby stipulate and respectfully request that this Court continue the 

hearing date on Defendant Tello’s Motion for Summary Judgment, or in the alternative, 

Summary Adjudication to Monday, November 28, 2016, at 1:30 p.m.

 WHEREAS, pursuant to stipulation of the parties, on October 27, 2016, the Court 

ordered that the complaint and claims of Plaintiff Lindsey Shamberger against Defendants Dana 

Tello and County of Yolo are dismissed with prejudice [ECF No. 27];

Case 2:14-cv-00243-WBS-DB Document 30 Filed 10/28/16 Page 1 of 2
Stipulation and [Proposed] Order to Continue Hearing on Defendant’s Motion for Summary 

Judgment, or in the alternative Summary Adjudication

Page - 2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 WHEREAS, additional time is required to effectuate the dismissal and/or compromise 

of the claims of Plaintiff E.C., a minor;

 WHEREAS, continuing the hearing date will not prejudice any party or their counsel; 

 WHEREAS, this request is not being made for the purpose of delay, or any other 

improper purpose; and

 THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED and agreed by and between the parties 

that this Court continue the hearing on Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment, or in the 

alternative, Summary Adjudication as set forth above. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Dated: 10/27/2016 LONGYEAR, O’DEA & LAVRA, LLP

By: /S/ John A. Lavra

JOHN A. LAVRA,

Attorney for County of Yolo and Dana Tello

Dated: 10/27/2016 By: /s/ Harry D. Roth 

HARRY D. ROTH 

Attorney for Plaintiffs

Lindsey Shamberger and Minor Son

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 28, 2016

Case 2:14-cv-00243-WBS-DB Document 30 Filed 10/28/16 Page 2 of 2