Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-04884/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-04884-3/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Edelson PC
Plaintiff
Hey, Inc.
Defendant
Jason Parker
Plaintiff
Twitter, Inc.
Defendant

Document Text:

COOLEY LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN FRANCISCO

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 STIPULATED REQUEST TO CONTINUE CMC

 NO. 3:16-CV-04884 WHA 

COOLEY LLP 

MICHAEL G. RHODES (116127) (rhodesmg@cooley.com) 

MATTHEW D. BROWN (196972) (brownmd@cooley.com) 

KYLE C. WONG (224021) (kwong@cooley.com) 

KAREN L. BURHANS (303290) (kburhans@cooley.com) 

101 California Street, 5th Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94111-5800 

Telephone: (415) 693-2000 

Facsimile: (415) 693-2222 

Attorneys for Defendant 

TWITTER, INC. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

JASON PARKER, individually and on behalf 

of all others similarly situated, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

HEY, INC., a Delaware corporation, and 

TWITTER, INC., a Delaware corporation, 

Defendants. 

Case No. 3:16-CV-04884 WHA 

STIPULATED REQUEST TO CONTINUE 

CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE;

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

CIVIL L.R. 6.2 

CMC: December 1, 2016 

Courtroom: 8 – 19th Floor 

 450 Golden Gate Avenue 

 San Francisco, CA 94102 

Judge: Hon. William Alsup 

Trial Date: Not Set

 

 

Case 3:16-cv-04884-WHA Document 34 Filed 11/14/16 Page 1 of 3
COOLEY LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN FRANCISCO

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 1. STIPULATED REQUEST TO CONTINUE CMC

 NO. 3:16-CV-04884 WHA 

This stipulated request is made jointly by Plaintiff Jason Parker (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant 

Twitter, Inc. (“Twitter”) (collectively, “the Parties”), by and through their respective counsel. 

WHEREAS, Plaintiff filed a complaint in the above-entitled action in the United States District 

Court, Northern District of California, on August 24, 2016 (the “Complaint”) (Dkt. No. 1); 

WHEREAS, on September 9, 2016, this case was reassigned to the Honorable William Alsup 

and all dates then scheduled were vacated (Dkt. No. 13); 

WHEREAS, on October 5, 2016, the Clerk entered a Notice (Dkt. No. 23) setting the Case 

Management Conference for December 1, 2016 and providing that, not less than seven days prior, 

counsel shall submit a joint case management statement not to exceed ten pages; 

WHEREAS, pursuant to the Parties’ September 24, 2016 stipulation extending Twitter’s 

deadline to respond to the Complaint, Twitter filed its Notice of Motion and Motion to Dismiss 

Plaintiff’s Complaint (“Motion to Dismiss”) (Dkt. No. 30) and its Request for Consideration of 

Documents Incorporated into Plaintiff’s Complaint and, in the Alternative, for Judicial Notice in 

Support of Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint (Dkt. No. 31) on November 2, 2016;

WHEREAS, Twitter noticed the hearing on its Motion to Dismiss for December 8, 2016; 

WHEREAS, Plaintiff’s Opposition to Twitter’s Motion to Dismiss is due on or before 

November 16, 2016, and Twitter’s Reply in Support of its Motion to Dismiss is due on or before 

November 23, 2016; and 

WHEREAS, the Parties agree that a seven-day continuance of the Case Management 

Conference, such that the Case Management Conference will fall on the same day as the hearing on 

Twitter’s Motion to Dismiss, will permit more efficient case management, will serve the interests of 

judicial economy, and will conserve Party and Court resources; 

NOW, THEREFORE, pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-2(a), the Parties make this stipulated 

request for an order providing the following: 

1. The Case Management Conference is continued from December 1, 2016 to December 

8, 2016 (the date on which Twitter’s Motion to Dismiss is noticed for hearing). 

2. Not less than seven days prior to the Case Management Conference, counsel shall 

submit a joint case management statement not to exceed ten pages. 

Case 3:16-cv-04884-WHA Document 34 Filed 11/14/16 Page 2 of 3
COOLEY LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN FRANCISCO

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 2. STIPULATED REQUEST TO CONTINUE CMC

 NO. 3:16-CV-04884 WHA 

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

Dated: November 10, 2016 

EDELSON PC 

/s/ Stewart R. Pollock 

Stewart R. Pollock 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

COOLEY LLP 

/s/ Matthew D. Brown 

Matthew D. Brown 

Attorneys for Defendant Twitter, Inc. 

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED:_____________ __________________________________________ 

 THE HONORABLE WILLIAM ALSUP 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

 

November 14, 2016.

Case 3:16-cv-04884-WHA Document 34 Filed 11/14/16 Page 3 of 3