Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca13-15-01630/USCOURTS-ca13-15-01630-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Netac Technology Co., Ltd.
Appellant
SanDisk Corporation
Appellee

Document Text:

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

NETAC TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD.,

Appellant

v.

SANDISK CORPORATION,

Appellee

______________________ 

2015-1630

______________________ 

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark 

Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board, in No. 95/000,384.

______________________ 

JUDGMENT

______________________ 

WENYE TAN, Anova Law Group, PLLC, Sterling, VA, 

argued for appellant. Also represented by XIAOQUN WU. 

DARRYL J. ADAMS, Baker Botts, LLP, Austin, TX, argued for appellee. Also represented by BRIAN W. OAKS;

RUSSELL J. CRAIN, Dallas, TX. 

______________________ 

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 

Case: 15-1630 Document: 51-2 Page: 1 Filed: 02/09/2016
 

 PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, MAYER and REYNA,

Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

February 9, 2016 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole

 Date Daniel E. O’Toole 

 Clerk of Court

Case: 15-1630 Document: 51-2 Page: 2 Filed: 02/09/2016