Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-03028/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-03028-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Intel Corporation
Defendant
Prudential California Realty
Plaintiff
Trotter-Vogel Realty, Inc.
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE RESPONSE DATE 

SF/21631436.1 

Bingham McCutchen LLP 

DAVID M. BALABANIAN (CA 37368) 

CHRISTOPHER B. HOCKETT (CA 121539) 

JOY K. FUYUNO (CA 193890) 

Three Embarcadero Center 

San Francisco, CA 94111-4067 

Telephone: (415) 393-2000 

Facsimile: (415) 393-2286 

Bingham McCutchen LLP 

RICHARD A. RIPLEY (DC 412959) 

1120 20th Street N.W., Suite 800 

Washington, DC 20036 

Telephone: (202) 778-6150 

Facsimile: (202) 778-6155 

Attorneys for Defendant 

Intel Corporation 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

TROTTER-VOGEL REALTY, INC. dba 

PRUDENTIAL CALIFORNIA REALTY, 

individually, and on behalf of all those similarly 

situated 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

INTEL CORPORATION, 

Defendant. 

No. C-05-3028-MHP

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER TO EXTEND FILING DATE 

FOR DEFENDANT’S RESPONSE TO 

PLAINTIFFS’ COMPLAINT 

IT IS STIPULATED BY AND BETWEEN THE PARTIES, THROUGH THEIR 

COUNSEL AS FOLLOWS: 

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-2, Defendant Intel Corporation and Plaintiff 

Trotter-Vogel Realty, Inc., dba Prudential California Realty hereby stipulate that Intel 

Corporation’s response to Plaintiff’s complaint shall be due either 60 days after transfer of the 

above captioned case pursuant to any motion to coordinate or consolidate pre-trial proceedings 

Case 3:05-cv-03028-MHP Document 13 Filed 08/19/05 Page 1 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

2 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE RESPONSE DATE 

SF/21631436.1 

per 28 U.S.C. Section 1407 or, in the alternative, 45 days after any such motion has been denied. 

The parties request this extension of time to answer or otherwise respond because the plaintiffs 

in Brauch, et al. v. Intel Corp., No. C 05-2743 (BZ) (N.D. Cal., filed July 5, 2005), a related 

matter, have filed a petition to coordinate or consolidate pre-trial proceedings per 28 U.S.C. 

Section 1407, and the above-styled action has been identified as a related action to that petition. 

As a result the outcome of the pending petition will impact significantly the schedule of this 

case. 

This is the first stipulation between the parties. Because this litigation has just 

begun, granting such a stipulation will not have any negative impact on the schedule of this case. 

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED. 

DATED: August 12, 2005 

Bingham McCutchen LLP 

By: /s/ Joy K. Fuyuno

JOY K. FUYUNO 

Attorneys for Defendant 

Intel Corporation 

DATED: August ___, 2005 

Cotchett, Pitre, Simon & McCarthy 

By: 

NANCY L. FINEMAN 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

Trotter-Vogel Realty, dba Prudential California 

Realty 

Case 3:05-cv-03028-MHP Document 13 Filed 08/19/05 Page 2 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

3 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE RESPONSE DATE 

SF/21631436.1 

[PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE DEFENDANT’S RESPONSE DATE

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant Intel Corporation’s response to 

Plaintiff’s complaint shall be due either 60 days after transfer of the above captioned case 

pursuant to any motion to coordinate or consolidate pre-trial proceedings per 28 U.S.C. Section 

1407, or, in the alternative, 45 days after any such motion has been denied. 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: _____________, 2005 

_________________________ 

Honorable Marilyn H. Patel

United States District Judge 

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Marilyn H. Patel

August 19

Case 3:05-cv-03028-MHP Document 13 Filed 08/19/05 Page 3 of 3