Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca10-88-01899/USCOURTS-ca10-88-01899-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Cathy
Appellee
Richard Demarest
Appellant
James Manspeaker
Appellee

Document Text:

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

TENTH CIRCUIT t="E:R i 2 1§91 

&OBERT L. HOECKER 

Clerk 

RICHARD DEMAREST, ) 

) 

Petitioner-Appellant, ) 

) 

v. ) 

) 

JAMES MANSPEAKER, Clerk of United ) 

States District Court for the ) 

District of Colorado; and CATHY, ) 

Last Name Unknown, ) 

) 

Defendants-Appellees. ) 

ORDER AND JUDGMENT* 

No. 88-1899 

(D.C. No. 88-F-843) 

(D. Colorado) 

Before LOGAN and EBEL, Circuit Judges, and COOK, District Judge.** 

This matter is before us upon remand from the United States 

Supreme Court. The Supreme Court of the United States held that 

the clear language of 28 u.s.c. S 1821 requires payment of witness 

fees to a convicted state prisoner who testifies at a federal 

trial pursuant to a writ of habeas corpus ad testificandum, 

reversing our holding to the contrary in Demarest v. Manspeaker, 

* This order and judgment has no precedential value and shall not 

be cited, or used by any court within the Tenth Circuit, except 

for purposes of establishing the doctrines of the law of the case, 

res judicata, or collateral estoppal. 10th Cir. R. 36.3. 

** The Honorable H. Dale Cook, Chief Judge, United States 

District Court for the Eastern, Northern and Western Districts of 

Oklahoma, sitting by designation. 

Appellate Case: 88-1899 Document: 010110103826 Date Filed: 02/22/1991 Page: 1 
884 F.2d 1343 (10th Cir. 1989). Demarest v. Manspeaker, 111 

S. Ct. 599 (1991). The case was remanded to us for further 

proceedings consistent with the Supreme Court's opinion. 

We hereby recall the mandate and vacate our earlier judgment. 

We conclude that there is nothing further for us to redetermine 

with respect to the case. The Supreme Court's action requires 

that the judgment of the United States District Court for the 

District of Colorado be reversed. The cause is remanded to the 

United States District Court for the District of Colorado for 

further proceedings in accordance with the opinion of the United 

States Supreme Court. 

It is so ordered. The mandate shall issue forthwith. 

-2-

Entered for the Court 

James K. Logan 

Circuit Judge 

Appellate Case: 88-1899 Document: 010110103826 Date Filed: 02/22/1991 Page: 2