Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca5-14-41158/USCOURTS-ca5-14-41158-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Albert W. Blakeway
Appellee
Hector R. Garza-Mata
Appellant
Eric H. Holder, Jr., U. S. Attorney General
Appellee
Jeh Charles Johnson, Secretary, Department of Homeland Security
Appellee
John Kerry
Appellee
Alejandro Mayorkas
Appellee
David L. Neal
Appellee
Thomas E. Perez, Secretary, Department of Labor
Appellee
Ron Rosenberg
Appellee
United States of America
Appellee

Document Text:

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-41158

Summary Calendar

HECTOR R. GARZA-MATA, Pro Se & Siblings similarly situated, 

 Plaintiff - Appellant

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; THOMAS E. PEREZ, SECRETARY, 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR; ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., U. S. ATTORNEY 

GENERAL, in his official capacity as head of the Department of Justice; 

DAVID L. NEAL, Chairman of the Board of Immigration Appeals; JOHN 

KERRY, Secretary, U.S. Department of State; JEH CHARLES JOHNSON, 

SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY; ALEJANDRO 

MAYORKAS, Director, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services; RON 

ROSENBERG, Chief of the Administrative Appeals Office - U.S. Citizenship 

and Immigration Services; ALBERT W. BLAKEWAY, Field Office Director -

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services - San Antonio, Texas, 

 Defendants - Appellees

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 5:14-CV-48

Before REAVLEY, DENNIS, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

March 20, 2015

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 14-41158 Document: 00512976163 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/20/2015
No. 14-41158

PER CURIAM:*

The lengthy complaint filed by the Plaintiff lists what is thought to have 

been official mistakes affecting his grandmother and other family members in 

past years. But no claim that warrants legal relief now by a federal court is 

set forth. As for the claim of citizenship, the district court has correctly 

explained why that must fail. The court also explained why the other civil and 

constitutional rights discussed by the Plaintiff state no legal complaint against 

any defendant. The case must be dismissed.

AFFIRMED.

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

2

 

Case: 14-41158 Document: 00512976163 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/20/2015