Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-02023/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-02023-5/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Erik K. Bardman
Defendant
Securities and Exchange Commission
Plaintiff
Jennifer F. Wolf
Defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CASE NO. 3:16-cv-02023 (JST)

William H. Kimball (State Bar No. 242626)

KANE+KIMBALL LLP

803 Hearst Avenue

Berkeley, CA 94710

Telephone: (510) 704-1400

Facsimile: (877) 482-4749

Email: wkimball@kanekimball.com

Attorneys for Defendant Jennifer F. Wolf

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION,

Plaintiff,

v.

ERIK K. BARDMAN,

and

JENNIFER F. WOLF,

Defendants.

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR 

DEFENDANT JENNIFER F. WOLF 

TO ANSWER AMENDED 

COMPLAINT

Case No. 3:16-cv-02023 (JST)

Judge: Hon. Jon S. Tigar

Case 3:16-cv-02023-JST Document 48 Filed 01/17/17 Page 1 of 4 Case 3:16-cv-02023-JST Document 49 Filed 01/17/17 Page 1 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 2 CASE NO. 3:16-cv-02023 (JST)

WHEREAS, on April 18, 2016, plaintiff Securities and Exchange Commission 

(“Plaintiff”) filed a complaint in the above-captioned action (the “Complaint”) asserting claims 

against defendants Erik K. Bardman and Jennifer F. Wolf (“Defendants”); 

WHEREAS, on October 27, 2016, the Court entered an Order Granting In Part And 

Denying In Part Defendants’ Motions To Dismiss (Dkt. No. 34);

WHEREAS, on November 28, 2016, Plaintiff filed an amended complaint (now 

titled, “Amended Complaint”) (Dkt. Nos. 39 and 42);

WHEREAS, Defendants, pursuant to a stipulation by the parties and the Court’s 

order, were required to answer or otherwise respond to the Amended Complaint by December 28, 

2016 (Dkt. No. 41);

WHEREAS, on December 14, 2016, Plaintiff and Defendant Wolf stipulated and 

requested that the Court enter a proposed order allowing Defendant Wolf to answer the Amended 

Complaint, pursuant to applicable rules of procedure or Court order, after the Court’s final ruling on 

a then-anticipated second motion to dismiss the Amended Complaint by Defendant Bardman (Dkt. 

No. 43);

WHEREAS, Defendant Wolf sought to delay her answer to the Amended Complaint 

until after the Court’s final ruling on Defendant’s Bardman’s second motion to dismiss in order to

avoid the potential expense of being required to amend her answer if the Amended Complaint were

later modified in light of the outcome of the second motion to dismiss;

WHEREAS, on December 28, 2016, Defendant Bardman moved to dismiss the 

Tenth Claim for Relief in the Amended Complaint (Dkt. No. 44, 45);

WHEREAS, on January 11, 2017, Plaintiff filed its opposition to Defendant 

Bardman’s second motion to dismiss (Dkt. No. 46);

WHEREAS, on January 13, 2017, the Court denied Defendant’s Wolf’s request to 

delay her answer to the Amended Complaint until after the Court’s final ruling on Defendant’s 

Bardman’s second motion to dismiss (Dkt. No. 47); 

WHEREAS, Plaintiff and Defendant Wolf have agreed that Defendant Wolf’s time 

to answer the Amended Complaint may be extended as follows;

Case 3:16-cv-02023-JST Document 48 Filed 01/17/17 Page 2 of 4 Case 3:16-cv-02023-JST Document 49 Filed 01/17/17 Page 2 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 3 CASE NO. 3:16-cv-02023 (JST)

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the attorneys for 

Plaintiff and the attorneys for Defendant Wolf, as follows:

1. Defendant Wolf shall answer the Amended Complaint no later than January 

23, 2017.

There have been two requests for an extension of time for Defendant Wolf 

previously made with respect to the Amended Complaint.

Dated: January 17, 2017 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

By: /s/ Paul W. Kisslinger

Paul W. Kisslinger

Paul W. Kisslinger (New Jersey Bar No. 6511995) kisslingerp@sec.gov

Kevin C. Lombardi (District of Columbia Bar No. 474114) lombardik@sec.gov

100 F Street, NE

Washington, DC 20549

Ph: (202) 551-4427

Fax: (202) 772-9772

Attorneys for Plaintiff Securities and Exchange Commission

Dated: January 17, 2017 KANE+KIMBALL LLP

By: /s/ William H. Kimball

William H. Kimball

803 Hearst Avenue

Berkeley, CA 94710

Ph: (510) 704-1400

Fax: (877) 482-4749

Attorneys for Defendant Jennifer F. Wolf

Case 3:16-cv-02023-JST Document 48 Filed 01/17/17 Page 3 of 4 Case 3:16-cv-02023-JST Document 49 Filed 01/17/17 Page 3 of 4
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 4 CASE NO. 3:16-cv-02023 (JST)

ATTESTATION (CIVIL LOCAL RULE 5-1(i)(3)) 

In accordance with Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I attest that concurrence in the filing 

of this document has been obtained from each signatory. 

Dated: January 17, 2017 KANE+KIMBALL LLP

 By: /s/ William H. Kimball 

 William H. Kimball 

Attorneys for Defendant Jennifer F. Wolf

* * * 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

 

Dated: January 17, 2017 Hon. Jon S. Tigar 

United States District Judge 

Case 3:16-cv-02023-JST Document 48 Filed 01/17/17 Page 4 of 4 Case 3:16-cv-02023-JST Document 49 Filed 01/17/17 Page 4 of 4