Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_16-cv-04074/USCOURTS-cand-4_16-cv-04074-5/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Ally Financial Inc.
Cross-defendant
Weerachai Chaiwong
Plaintiff
Hanlees Fremont Hyundai
Defendant
Hanlees Fremont, Inc.
Cross-claimant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 07462.0532/10972529.1 4:16-cv-04074-HSG

STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR HANLEES FREMONT, INC. 

TO RESPOND TO ALLY FINANCIAL’S MOTION TO DISMISS AMENDED CROSS-CLAIM, 

AND FOR ALLY TO FILE ITS REPLY, PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 6-2 , 

MARTIN S. PUTNAM (State Bar No. 160951) 

martin@putnamlaw.com

1300 Clay Street, Suite 600

Oakland, CA 94612

Tel. (510) 466-6300

Fax (510) 225-2625

Attorneys for Defendant and Cross-Complainant

HANLEES FREMONT, INC.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, OAKLAND DIVISION

WEERACHAI CHAIWONG, an individual,

Plaintiff,

vs.

HANLEES FREMONT, INC., a California 

Corporation, dba HANLEES FREMONT 

HYUNDAI; ALLY FINANCIAL, INC., a 

Delaware Corporation; and DOES 1 through 

75, inclusive,

Defendants.

Case No. 4:16-cv-04074-HSG

STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER 

EXTENDING TIME FOR HANLEES 

FREMONT, INC. TO RESPOND TO 

ALLY FINANCIAL’S MOTION TO 

DISMISS AMENDED CROSS-CLAIM, 

AND FOR ALLY TO FILE ITS REPLY,

PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 6-2

Action Filed: May 25, 2016 

Alameda Superior

Removed to USDC, ND of California:

July 20, 2016

Pursuant to Local Rule 6-2, defendant and cross-complainant Hanlees Fremont, Inc. 

(“Hanlees”), defendant Ally Financial Inc. (“Ally”), and Plaintiff Weerachai Chaiwong (together, 

the “Parties”), by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate as follows:

STIPULATION 

WHEREAS, Hanlees filed an answer to plaintiff’s second amended complaint and a first 

amended cross-claim against Ally on October 27, 2017;

WHEREAS, Hanlees stipulated to a 17-day extension of time for Ally to respond to the 

amended cross-claim, from November 10, 2017 to November 27, 2017; 

WHEREAS, Ally filed a motion to dismiss the amended cross-claim on November 27, 

2017;

Case 4:16-cv-04074-HSG Document 68 Filed 12/13/17 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 07462.0532/10972529.1 2 4:16-cv-04074-HSG

STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR HANLEES FREMONT, INC.

TO RESPOND TO ALLY FINANCIAL’S MOTION TO DISMISS AMENDED CROSS-CLAIM, 

AND FOR ALLY TO FILE ITS REPLY, PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 6-2 

WHEREAS, Hanlees’ opposition to Ally’s Motion to Dismiss is presently due to be filed 

on December 11, 2017; 

WHEREAS, counsel for Hanlees is engaged in a hearing on the merits of another case now 

before the American Arbitration Association, Gless v. Zoom, that has been extended to December 

11, 2017;

WHEREAS, the parties have stipulated to an extension of time for Hanlees to file such

opposition up to and including December 22, 2017; 

WHEREAS, the extension on the deadline for Hanlees to file its opposition would make 

Ally’s reply due on December 29, 2017;

WHEREAS, Ally’s counsel has scheduling conflicts the week of December 25, 2017, and 

the parties have stipulated that Ally may have an extension of time to file its reply to and including 

January 4, 2018; and

WHEREAS, these extensions will not have any effect on the current schedule for the case.

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the Parties hereto, through their 

respective attorneys of record, to an order granting Hanlees an 11-day extension, up to and 

including December 22, 2017, in which to file a response to Ally’s Motion to Dismiss the 

amended cross-claim. IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED that Ally may have an extension on its 

deadline to file its reply to January 4, 2018. 

This Stipulation requests the first extension of time for Hanlees to respond to Ally’s 

motion to dismiss the amended cross-claim and for Ally to file its reply in support of the motion to 

dismiss, and is made without prejudice to, or waiver of, any rights or defenses otherwise available 

to the Parties in this action. 

//

//

//

//

//

Case 4:16-cv-04074-HSG Document 68 Filed 12/13/17 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 07462.0532/10972529.1 3 4:16-cv-04074-HSG

STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR HANLEES FREMONT, INC.

TO RESPOND TO ALLY FINANCIAL’S MOTION TO DISMISS AMENDED CROSS-CLAIM, 

AND FOR ALLY TO FILE ITS REPLY, PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 6-2 

DATED: December 11, 2017 SEVERSON & WERSON

A Professional Corporation

By: /s/ Erik Kemp

Erik Kemp

Attorneys for Defendant

ALLY FINANCIAL INC.

DATED: December 11, 2017 LAW OFFICES OF MARTIN PUTNAM

By: /s/ Martin Putnam

Martin Putnam

Attorney for Defendant and Cross-Complainant

HANLEES FREMONT, INC.

DATED: December 11, 2017 LAW OFFICES OF GLASSEY | SMITH

 By: /s/ Joshua C. Anaya______________________

 Joshua C. Anaya

Attorneys for Plaintiff

WEERACHAI CHAIWONG

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED:__________________________ _____________________________________

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

12/13/2017

Case 4:16-cv-04074-HSG Document 68 Filed 12/13/17 Page 3 of 3