Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-01344/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-01344-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Barry Jameson
Petitioner
James Yates
Respondent

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BARRY JAMESON, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

v. )

)

JAMES YATES, Warden, )

)

Respondent. )

 )

1:07-cv-01344-LJO-DLB-HC

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATION (Doc. 6)

ORDER DISMISSING CERTAIN

GROUNDS OF PETITION

ORDER REFERRING MATTER BACK

TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE FOR

BRIEFING SCHEDULE

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a

Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. 

On October 12, 2007, the Magistrate Judge filed Findings and a

Recommendation that this action proceed on Grounds One and Two of

the petition, that Grounds Three and Four of the petition be

DISMISSED for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be

granted, and this matter be referred back to the Magistrate Judge

for issuance of a briefing schedule. These Findings and

Recommendation were served on all parties and contained notice that

any objections were to be filed within thirty (30) days from the

date of service of that order. To date, the parties have not filed

objections to the Findings and Recommendation.

Case 1:07-cv-01344-LJO-DLB Document 7 Filed 12/04/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636

(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a de novo review of the case. 

Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court concludes that

the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation are supported by

the record and proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendation, filed October 12, 2007,

are ADOPTED IN FULL;

2. This action proceed on Grounds One and Two of the

petition;

3. Grounds Three and Four of the petition are DISMISSED for

failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted; and,

4. This matter is referred back to the Magistrate Judge for

issuance of a briefing schedule. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: December 4, 2007 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill 

b9ed48 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:07-cv-01344-LJO-DLB Document 7 Filed 12/04/07 Page 2 of 2