Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-02098/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-02098-2/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Ducks Unlimited, Inc.
Defendant
Scott E. Steele
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION TO ORDER -1-

Randal M. Barnum

State Bar No. 111287

LAW OFFICES OF RANDAL M. BARNUM

279 East H Street

Benicia, CA 94510

Phone: (707) 745-3747

Fax No.: (707)745-4580

Attorney for Plaintiff

SCOTT E. STEELE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SCOTT E. STEELE, NO. 2:06-CV-02098-GEB-EFB

Plaintiff, STIPULATION TO ORDER TO

 . (PROPOSED) ORDER TO CONTINUE

vs. DATES FOR DISCLOSURE OF

INITIAL EXPERT WITNESS

 DISCLOSURES AND REBUTTAL

DUCKS UNLIMITED, INC. EXPERT DISCLOSURE 

 Defendants. Dept. 10 (Hon. Garland E. Burrell, Jr.) 

____________________________/

The parties hereto, through their respective attorneys of record herein, stipulate and

agree that the initial expert witness disclosures in this case, currently due by May 21, 2007,

be continued to July 27, 2007 and rebuttal expert disclosures currently due by June 21, 2007

be continued to August 27, 2007.

Good cause exists for this stipulation and continuance of these dates as requested by

Plaintiff’s attorney because Plaintiff’s attorney is in the process of withdrawing as counsel

of record and has filed a motion to withdraw which is scheduled for hearing before this court

on June 25, 2007. The continuance of these dates will allow additional time for Plaintiff’s

new counsel or Plaintiff in pro per to retain and designate the appropriate experts, if any.

These disclosures would occur well in advance of the trial date scheduled for May 20, 2008.

//

//

Case 2:06-cv-02098-GEB-EFB Document 22 Filed 05/02/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Since the parties stipulate to this modification, and the modification can be 1

made in a manner that will not adversely affect the Court’s docket, the good

cause issue is not reached.

STIPULATION TO ORDER -2-

So agreed.

Dated: April 17, 2007 Law Offices of RANDAL M. BARNUM

By: /s/ 

RANDAL M. BARNUM, Attorneys for

Plaintiff, Scott E. Steele

Dated: April 17, 2007 Kiesewetter Wise Kaplan Prather, PLC

By: /s/ 

SYLVIA ADAMS, Attorneys for Defendant

Ducks Unlimited

ORDER

Pursuant to the foregoing stipulation, IT IS ORDERED that the initial expert witness

disclosures shall be continued to July 27, 2007 and the rebuttal expert disclosures be

continued to August 27, 2007.1

Dated: May 1, 2007

 

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.

United States District Judge

Case 2:06-cv-02098-GEB-EFB Document 22 Filed 05/02/07 Page 2 of 2