Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-00987/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-00987-3/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Deuel Vocational Institute
Defendant
Devry John Reed
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

United States District Court

Eastern District of California 

Devry John Reed,

Plaintiff, No. Civ. S 05-0987 LKK PAN P

vs. Findings and Recommendations

Deuel Vocational Institute,

Defendant.

-oOoJune 3, 2005, the court dismissed plaintiff’s complaint for

failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted and

explained the complaint’s deficiencies, giving plaintiff leave to

file an amended complaint correcting those deficiencies. The

time allowed for amendment now has expired and plaintiff has not

filed an amended complaint.

Accordingly, I hereby recommend that this action be

dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be

granted. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A; 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).

Case 2:05-cv-00987-LKK -PAN Document 19 Filed 12/28/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l), these

findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States

District Judge assigned to this case. Written objections may be

filed within 20 days of service of these findings and

recommendations. The document should be captioned “Objections to

Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” The district

judge may accept, reject, or modify these findings and

recommendations in whole or in part.

Dated: December 27, 2005. 

 /s/ Peter A. Nowinski 

 PETER A. NOWINSKI

 Magistrate Judge

Case 2:05-cv-00987-LKK -PAN Document 19 Filed 12/28/05 Page 2 of 2