Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-16-07165/USCOURTS-ca4-16-07165-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Clarence D. Coakley
Appellant
United States of America
Appellee

Document Text:

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-7165

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

CLARENCE D. COAKLEY,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of North Carolina, at New Bern. Terrence W. Boyle, 

District Judge. (4:96-cr-00026-BO-1)

Submitted: December 15, 2016 Decided: December 20, 2016

Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam.

Clarence D. Coakley, Appellant Pro Se. Matthew Fesak, Assistant 

United States Attorney, Seth Morgan Wood, OFFICE OF THE UNITED 

STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 16-7165 Doc: 10 Filed: 12/20/2016 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Clarence D. Coakley appeals the district court’s order

denying his motion for reduction in sentence pursuant to 18 

U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012). We have reviewed the record and 

find no reversible error. See United States v. Munn, 595 F.3d 

183, 187 (4th Cir. 2010) (“[A] defendant who was convicted of a 

crack offense but sentenced pursuant to a mandatory statutory 

minimum sentence is ineligible for a reduction under 

§ 3582(c)(2).”). Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before the court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Appeal: 16-7165 Doc: 10 Filed: 12/20/2016 Pg: 2 of 2