Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_05-cv-03522/USCOURTS-cand-4_05-cv-03522-6/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.
Counter-defendant
Taiwan Sumida Electronics, Inc.
Counter-claimant

Document Text:

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SILICON VALLEY

 

 

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING ADMIN

MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL

Case No. C05-3522 CW

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

LATHAM & WATKINS LLP 

Mark A. Flagel (Bar No. 110635) 

Robert Steinberg (Bar No. 126407) 

 John D. Minton (Bar No. 223823) 

140 Scott Drive 

Menlo Park, CA 94025 

Telephone: (650) 328-4600 

Facsimile: (650) 463-2600 

Email: john.minton@lw.com

Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant 

Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

OAKLAND DIVISION 

MONOLITHIC POWER SYSTEMS, INC., a 

Delaware corporation, 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

TAIWAN SUMIDA ELECTRONICS, INC., 

a Taiwan corporation, 

 Defendant. 

CASE NO. C 05-3522 CW 

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF AND 

COUNTERCLAIM DEFENDANT 

MONOLITHIC POWER SYSTEM, INC.’S 

ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE 

UNDER SEAL REGARDING MONOLITHIC 

POWER SYSTEMS, INC.’S OPPOSITION 

TO TAIWAN SUMIDA ELECTRONICS, 

INC.’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY 

JUDGMENT AND MPS’S MOTION FOR 

SUMMARY ADJUDICATION

The Honorable Claudia Wilken 

TAIWAN SUMIDA ELECTRONICS, INC., 

a Taiwan corporation, 

 Counterclaimant, 

 v. 

MONOLITHIC POWER SYSTEMS, INC., a 

Delaware corporation, 

 Counterclaim Defendant. 

Case 4:05-cv-03522-CW Document 94 Filed 04/26/07 Page 1 of 2
ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SILICON VALLEY

 

2

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING ADMIN. 

MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL 

Case No. C05-3522 CW

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

The Court, having considered Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.’s (“MPS”) Administrative 

Motion (the “Administrative Motion”) to File Under Seal Regarding MPS’s Opposition to 

Taiwan Sumida Electronics, Inc.’s Motion for Summary Judgment and MPS’s Motion for 

Summary Adjudication (the “Opposition and Motion”), John D. Minton’s Declaration in Support 

of the Administrative Motion, and good cause appearing therefore, 

HEREBY ORDERS: 

 Plaintiff MPS’s Motion is GRANTED as to Exhibits 1, 3, 4, 5, 15, 16, 19, 20, 21, 22, 25, 

26, 27, 28, 32, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 43, 44, 45 and 46 to John D. Minton’s Declaration in Support 

of the Opposition and Motion, portions of the Opposition and Motion, and portions of Michael 

Barclay’s Declaration in Support of the Opposition and Motion. 

 IT IS SO ORDERED. 

 4/26/07 

DATED: ____________________ 

____________________________________ 

The Honorable Claudia Wilken 

United States District Judge 

Case 4:05-cv-03522-CW Document 94 Filed 04/26/07 Page 2 of 2