Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-02301/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-02301-5/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Amtran Technology Co., LTD.
Defendant
Hitachi, Ltd.
Plaintiff

Document Text:

MCDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP

ATTORN EYS AT LAW

PALO ALTO

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING CLAIM

CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE

1 CASE NO. C 05 02301 CRB (JL)

C 05 02302 CRB

McDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP

Daniel E. Alberti (State Bar No. 68620)

dalberti@mwe.com

Stephen J. Akerley (State Bar No. 160757)

sakerley@mwe.com

Elaine M. Heal (State Bar No. 211723)

eheal@mwe.com

3150 Porter Drive

Palo Alto, CA 94304-1212

Telephone: 650.813.5000

Facsimile: 650.813.5100

McDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP

Joseph H. Paquin, Jr. (Pro Hac Vice)

jpaquin@mwe.com

227 West Monroe Street, Suite 4400

Chicago, IL 60606-5096

Telephone: 312.372.2000

Facsimile: 312.984.7700

Attorneys for Plaintiff HITACHI, LTD.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

HITACHI, LTD., a Japanese corporation,

Plaintiff,

v.

AMTRAN TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD., a

Taiwanese corporation,

Defendant.

CASE NO. C 05 02301 CRB (JL)

ELECTRONIC CASE FILING

[PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING

CLAIM CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE

HITACHI, LTD., a Japanese corporation,

Plaintiff,

v.

TATUNG COMPANY, a Taiwanese

corporation; and TATUNG CO. OF

AMERICA, INC., a California corporation,

Defendants.

CASE NO. C 05 02302 CRB

ELECTRONIC CASE FILING

[PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING

CLAIM CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE

Case 3:05-cv-02301-CRB Document 61 Filed 03/21/06 Page 1 of 2
MCDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP

ATTORN EYS AT LAW

PALO ALTO

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING CLAIM

CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE

2 CASE NO. C 05 02301 CRB (JL)

C 05 02302 CRB

Pursuant to the Court’s order, the following claim construction schedule is adopted:

ACTION DATE

Preliminary Invalidity Contentions: Tatung

Company and Tatung Co. of America, Inc. only

May 16, 2006

Document production on invalidity: Tatung

Company and Tatung Co. of America, Inc. only

May 16, 2006

Parties simultaneously exchange lists of claim

terms for construction by the court

May 31, 2006

Parties simultaneously exchange a preliminary

proposed construction of each claim term, and

provide a list of proposed extrinsic evidence

June 20, 2006

Parties shall complete and file a Joint Claim

Construction and Prehearing Statement

July 17, 2006

Parties complete all discovery relating to claim

construction, including depositions of all experts

and non-experts identified in the Joint Claim

Construction Statement

August 16, 2006

The party claiming patent infringement shall file

and serve an opening brief and any evidence

supporting its claim construction

August 31, 2006

The opposing party shall file and serve a

responsive brief an supporting evidence

September 14, 2006

The party claiming patent infringement shall

serve and file any reply brief and any evidence

September 21, 2006

Claim Construction Tutorial November 14, 2006

2:30 p.m.

Claim Construction Hearing November 16, 2006

2:30 p.m.

Dated:

Honorable Charles R. Breyer

United States District Judge

Northern District of California

MPK 105749-1.017575.0688

March 21, 2006

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DIST

ICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Charles R. Breyer

Case 3:05-cv-02301-CRB Document 61 Filed 03/21/06 Page 2 of 2