Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_12-cv-01481/USCOURTS-caed-2_12-cv-01481-9/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Burley D. Tompkins
Plaintiff
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BURLEY D. TOMPKINS, No. 2:12-CV-1481-CMK

Plaintiff, 

vs. ORDER

UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD

COMPANY,

Defendant.

 /

Plaintiff brings this civil action under the Federal Employers Liability Act, 45

U.S.C. §§ 51, et seq. This matter is before the court on the parties’ joint request for an in camera

review of documents. At issue is whether certain entries in plaintiff’s calendar are subject to the

attorney-client privilege. Having reviewed the disputed calendar entries in camera, the court

finds that the following entries are privileged: May 16, 2011; May 17, 2011; May 31, 2011; July

18, 2011; August 18, 2011; March 2, 2012; May 9, 2012; June 26, 2012; October 5, 2012;

October 10, 2012; October 12, 2012; and November 6, 2012. 

/ / /

/ / /

1

Case 2:12-cv-01481-CMK Document 55 Filed 05/06/15 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

The Clerk of the Court is directed to terminate Doc. 48 as a pending motion. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: May 6, 2015

______________________________________

CRAIG M. KELLISON

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

2

Case 2:12-cv-01481-CMK Document 55 Filed 05/06/15 Page 2 of 2