Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-10-06278/USCOURTS-ca4-10-06278-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
United States of America
Appellee
Carlos Woods
Appellant

Document Text:

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-6278

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

CARLOS WOODS,

Defendant – Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

Maryland, at Baltimore. William D. Quarles, Jr., District 

Judge. (1:07-cr-00127-WDQ-1) 

Submitted: July 22, 2010 Decided: August 2, 2010

Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. 

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Carlos Woods, Appellant Pro Se. John Walter Sippel, Jr., 

Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 10-6278 Doc: 15 Filed: 08/02/2010 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM: 

Carlos Woods seeks to appeal the district court’s 

order denying reconsideration of the denial of his motion for 

appointment of counsel. This court may exercise jurisdiction 

only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain 

interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); 

Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 

337 U.S. 541, 545-47 (1949). The order Woods seeks to appeal is 

neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or 

collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack 

of jurisdiction. We deny Woods’ motion for appointment of 

counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process. 

DISMISSED

Appeal: 10-6278 Doc: 15 Filed: 08/02/2010 Pg: 2 of 2