Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_13-cv-01787/USCOURTS-caed-2_13-cv-01787-3/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Commissioner of Social Security
Defendant
Noreen Lynette Thompson
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

NOREEN LYNETTE THOMPSON, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting 

Commissioner of Social Security, 

Defendant. 

No. 2:13-cv-1787-EFB 

ORDER 

Plaintiff seeks judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security 

(“Commissioner”) denying her application for Supplemental Security Income (“SSI”) under Title 

XVI of the Social Security Act. The parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment are pending. 

In her motion for summary judgment, plaintiff argues, among other things, that the Commissioner 

failed to file a complete record as required by 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), by not including all of the 

evidence relied upon by the administrative law judge (“ALJ”) in his decision denying her 

application for SSI. ECF No. 15-1 at 12-14. Specifically, the Commissioner submitted a draft 

(including editorial comments to correct typographical errors) rather than final version of a 

decision by an ALJ that was relied upon in issuing the decision that is now before the court for 

review. 

Case 2:13-cv-01787-EFB Document 20 Filed 02/25/15 Page 1 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2

Plaintiff previously filed an application for SSI on June 2, 2008, alleging that she had been 

disabled since July 12, 2002. Administrative Record (“AR”) 91. On February 22, 2010, 

Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) Timothy S. Snelling apparently issued a decision finding that 

plaintiff was not disabled under section 1614(a)(3)(A) of the Act. Id. at 88-101. A copy of the 

final version of that decision has not been included in the record before the court and the 

Commissioner has not otherwise filed a copy.1 

Plaintiff filed a new application for SSI on June 25, 2010, alleging disability since June 

12, 2008. After a hearing on her claim of disability, the assigned ALJ, William C. Thompson, 

issued a decision finding that plaintiff was not disabled under section 1614(a)(3)(A) of the Act. 

Id. at 13-27. Significantly, in reaching this decision, the ALJ relied heavily on ALJ Snelling’s 

prior decision, which concluded that plaintiff was not disabled on or before February 22, 2010. 

However, the administrative record filed in this case does not contain the final decision issued by 

ALJ Snelling in plaintiff’s prior SSI case. Instead, the record contains what appears to be a draft 

of ALJ Snelling’s decision. AR 91-98. The document contains notations in the margins with 

proposed corrections and while purporting to bears “/s/” on the signature line it is not actually 

signed by ALJ Snelling. Furthermore, there are so many editorial comments calling for further 

edits and corrections to the document that there is no reason to conclude that the ALJ intended 

that version to serve as a final decision. There is simply no evidence to authenticate that the 

unsigned version is in fact the final decision issued by ALJ Snelling. 

The absence of a copy of the final decision issued by ALJ Snelling was raised by plaintiff 

in her motion for summary judgment. The Commissioner’s cross-motion for summary judgment 

does not squarely address this concern and glosses over the fact that only a working draft is 

contained in the record. Given ALJ Thompson’s heavy reliance on ALJ Snelling’s prior decision, 

a properly authenticated final version of Snelling’s decision should have been included in the 

administrative record so that the court could properly evaluate the merits of plaintiff’s 

///// 

 1

 According to the Commissioner, plaintiff did not appeal that decision. 

Case 2:13-cv-01787-EFB Document 20 Filed 02/25/15 Page 2 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

3

argument. As it was not, the Commissioner is ordered to file by March 4, 2015, a final and 

signed copy of ALJ Snelling’s February 22, 2010 decision. 

DATED: February 25, 2015. 

 

Case 2:13-cv-01787-EFB Document 20 Filed 02/25/15 Page 3 of 3