Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_14-cv-00964/USCOURTS-caed-1_14-cv-00964-2/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
CVS Pharmacy, Inc.
Defendant
Caremark RX LLC
Defendant
Francisco Nieves Reyes
Plaintiff

Document Text:

STIPULATION AND ORDER RE CONTINUATION OF SCHEDULING CONFERENCE 

PENDING MEDIATION

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Gregory N. Karasik (SBN 115834)

Karasik Law Firm

11835 W. Olympic Blvd. Ste. 1275

Los Angeles, CA 90064

Tel (310) 312-6800

Fax (310) 943-2582

greg@karasiklawfirm.com

Sahag Majarian II – State Bar No. 146621

Law Office of Sahag Majarian II

18250 Ventura Boulevard

Tarzana, California 91356

Tel: (818) 609-0807; Fax: (818) 609-0892

sahagii@aol.com

Attorneys for Plaintiff

FRANCISCO NIEVES REYES

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

FRANCISCO NIEVES REYES, individually 

and on behalf of other persons similarly 

situated,

Plaintiffs,

vs.

CVS PHARMACY, INC.; CAREMARK RX 

LLC; and DOES 1 through 10.

Defendants.

Case No. 1:14-CV-00964 MJS

STIPULATION RE CONTIUANCE OF 

SCHEDULING CONFERENCE PENDING 

MEDIATION and ORDER THEREON

Plaintiff Francisco Nieves Reyes (“Plaintiff”) and Defendants CVS Pharmacy, Inc. and CVS 

Caremark Corporation (erroneously sued as Caremark RX LLC) (“Defendants”), by and through their 

respective counsel of record, hereby enter into the following Stipulation re Continuance of Scheduling 

Conference Pending Mediation and mutually request the Court to enter an order in accordance 

therewith.

STIPULATION

1. On February 20, 2015, the Court issued an order establishing the following schedule 

with respect to Plaintiff’s then anticipated motion for class certification:

Case 1:14-cv-00964-MJS Document 32 Filed 06/09/15 Page 1 of 3
 STIPULATION AND ORDER RE CONTINUATION OF SCHEDULING CONFERENCE 

PENDING MEDIATION

2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Filing Deadline May 11 2015

Opposition Due June 11, 2015

Reply Due June 25, 2015

Hearing Date July 31, 2015

2. Following the deposition of Defendant with respect to certain topics on April 30, 2015, 

the parties agreed to suspend discovery and participate in a private mediation. As a result of that 

agreement, Plaintiff did not file a motion for class certification by the May 11 deadline.

3. As a result of Plaintiff not filing a motion for class certification by the May 11 deadline, 

the Court set a scheduling conference for July 31, 2015.

4. The parties recently confirmed mediation arrangements. The mediation is scheduled to 

take place on July 30, 2015 before mediator Barry Winograd.

5. In light of the foregoing, the parties mutually request that the scheduling conference be 

continued for approximately 30 days.

Dated: June 8, 2015 KARASIK LAW FIRM

By /s/ Gregory N. Karasik

Gregory N. Karasik

Attorneys for Plaintiff

Dated: June 8, 2015 SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP

By /s/ Jennifer B. Zargarof

Jennifer B. Zargarof

Attorneys for Defendants

ORDER

Good cause having been shown, the scheduling conference presently set for July 31, 2015 is 

continued to August 28, 2015 at 11:30 AM.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 9, 2015 /s/Michael J. Seng 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:14-cv-00964-MJS Document 32 Filed 06/09/15 Page 2 of 3
 STIPULATION AND ORDER RE CONTINUATION OF SCHEDULING CONFERENCE 

PENDING MEDIATION

3

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Case 1:14-cv-00964-MJS Document 32 Filed 06/09/15 Page 3 of 3