Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_08-cv-00517/USCOURTS-caed-1_08-cv-00517-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Iyer
Defendant
Laura L. Medley
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LAURA L. MEDLEY, 

Plaintiff,

v.

DR. IYER,

Defendant.

 /

1:08-cv-00517-AWI-SMS-PC

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS,

RECOMMENDING THAT THIS ACTION BE

DISMISSED, WITH PREJUDICE, FOR

FAILURE TO OBEY A COURT ORDER AND

FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM UPON

WHICH RELIEF MAY BE GRANTED 

(Doc. 1.)

OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN

THIRTY DAYS

Plaintiff, Laura L. Medley (“Plaintiff”), is a former state prisoner proceeding pro se in this

civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed this action on April 15, 2008. (Doc.

1.) On November 3, 2009, the undersigned dismissed Plaintiff’s complaint for failure to state a

claim upon which relief may be granted and gave Plaintiff leave to file an amended complaint within

thirty days. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A; 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e). (Doc. 6.) To date, Plaintiff has not complied

with or otherwise responded to the Court’s order. As a result, there is no pleading on file which sets 1

forth any claims upon which relief may be granted under section 1983. 

///

On November 16, 2009, the United States Postal Service returned the court’s order as undeliverable, with a

1

notation “Out of Custody.” Plaintiff has not notified the court of any change in her address. Absent such notice,

service at a party’s prior address is fully effective. Local Rule 83-182(f).

1

Case 1:08-cv-00517-AWI -SMS Document 7 Filed 01/06/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Accordingly, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A and 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e), the undersigned

HEREBY RECOMMENDS that:

1. This action be dismissed, with prejudice, based on Plaintiff’s failure to obey the

court's order and Plaintiff's failure to state any claims upon which relief may be

granted under section 1983; and 

2. The Clerk be DIRECTED to close this case.

These Findings and Recommendations will be submitted to the United States District Judge

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of Title 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within thirty (30)

days after being served with these Findings and Recommendations, Plaintiff may file written

objections with the Court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s

Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the

specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d

1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 5, 2010 /s/ Sandra M. Snyder 

icido3 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

2

Case 1:08-cv-00517-AWI -SMS Document 7 Filed 01/06/10 Page 2 of 2