Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_16-cv-01131/USCOURTS-caed-2_16-cv-01131-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
J. Robustelli
Defendant
Denicio Velasquez
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DENICIO VELASQUEZ,

Plaintiff,

v.

J. ROBUSTELLI, et al.,

Defendants.

No. 2:16-cv-1131 JAM CKD P

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

On May 31, 2016, plaintiff was ordered to file a completed application to proceed in 

forma pauperis within thirty days and was cautioned that failure to do so would result in 

dismissal. The thirty day period has now expired and plaintiff has not complied with the court’s 

May 31, 2016 order. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without 

prejudice.

These findings and recommendations will be submitted to the United States District Judge 

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 

after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections 

with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Findings and 

Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time 

/////

Case 2:16-cv-01131-JAM-CKD Document 10 Filed 07/13/16 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th 

Cir. 1991).

Dated: July 13, 2016

1

vela1131.fifp

_____________________________________

CAROLYN K. DELANEY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:16-cv-01131-JAM-CKD Document 10 Filed 07/13/16 Page 2 of 2