Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_24-cv-01107/USCOURTS-caed-2_24-cv-01107-2/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Jeffrey Todd Eastman
Petitioner
Warden
Respondent

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JEFFREY TODD EASTMAN,

Petitioner,

v.

WARDEN,

Respondent.

Case No. 2:24-cv-01107-TLN-JDP

ORDER

Petitioner Jeffrey Todd Eastman (“Petitioner”), a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has 

filed this application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was 

referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 

302.

On October 3, 2024, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 

which were served on Petitioner, and which contained notice to Petitioner that any objections to 

the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Petitioner has not filed 

objections to the findings and recommendations.

The Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 

F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. 

See Robbins v. Carey, 481 F.3d 1143, 1147 (9th Cir. 2007) (“[D]eterminations of law by the 

magistrate judge are reviewed de novo by both the district court and [the appellate] court . . . .”). 

Case 2:24-cv-01107-TLN-JDP Document 9 Filed 10/30/24 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

The Court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by 

the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations (ECF No. 8) are ADOPTED IN FULL;

2. Petitioner’s motion to stay (ECF No. 7) be is DENIED; and

3. This matter is referred back to the assigned magistrate for all further pretrial matters.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Date: October 29, 2024 

___________________________________

TROY L. NUNLEY

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:24-cv-01107-TLN-JDP Document 9 Filed 10/30/24 Page 2 of 2