Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_15-cv-01761/USCOURTS-caed-1_15-cv-01761-7/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Phil Campbell
Plaintiff
Commissioner of Social Security
Defendant

Document Text:

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

On November 22, 2016, Defendant filed a stipulation of the parties for a seven-day extension of 

time for Defendant to respond to Plaintiff’s opening brief. (Doc. 23) Notably, the Scheduling Order 

allows for a single extension of thirty days by the stipulation of the parties (Doc. 5-1 at 4), which was 

previously used by Plaintiff. (Docs. 15, 16) Beyond that extension, “requests to modify [the 

scheduling] order must be made by written motion and will be granted only for good cause.” (Doc. 10

at 4) Based upon the information provided and good cause appearing, the Court ORDERS:

1. Defendant’s request for an extension of time is GRANTED; and

2. Defendant SHALL file a response to the brief on or before December 9, 2016.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: November 28, 2016 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

PHIL CAMPBELL,

 Plaintiff,

v.

CAROLYN W. COLVIN, 

Acting Commissioner of Social Security, 

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: 1:15-cv-1761- JLT 

ORDER GRANTING A SECOND EXTENSION OF 

TIME

(Doc. 23)

Case 1:15-cv-01761-JLT Document 24 Filed 11/28/16 Page 1 of 1