Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_02-cv-02481/USCOURTS-cand-3_02-cv-02481-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Jose Garcia Rodriguez
Petitioner
D. L. Runnels
Respondent

Document Text:

KW/MOATT

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

In re: JOSE GARCIA RODRIGUEZ.

JOSE GARCIA RODRIGUEZ,

 Petitioner,

 v.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF

CALIFORNIA,

 Respondent,

D. L. RUNNELS,

 Real Party in Interest.

No. 09-73926

D.C. No. 3:02-cv-02481-CRB

Northern District of California, 

San Francisco

ORDER

Before: CANBY, GOULD and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.

Petitioner has not demonstrated that this case warrants the intervention of

this court by means of the extraordinary remedy of mandamus. See Bauman v.

United States Dist. Court, 557 F.2d 650 (9th Cir. 1977). Accordingly, the petition

is denied. 

FILED

FEB 10 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

Case: 09-73926 02/10/2010 Page: 1 of 2 ID: 7227018 DktEntry: 3 Case 3:02-cv-02481-CRB Document 18 Filed 02/16/10 Page 1 of 2
KW/MOATT 2 09-73926

The motions to proceed in forma pauperis and for appointment of counsel

are denied as moot.

No motions for reconsideration, rehearing, clarification, or any other

submissions shall be filed or entertained in this closed docket.

Case: 09-73926 02/10/2010 Page: 2 of 2 ID: 7227018 DktEntry: 3 Case 3:02-cv-02481-CRB Document 18 Filed 02/16/10 Page 2 of 2