Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-15-01935/USCOURTS-ca4-15-01935-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Catherine Denise Randolph
Appellant

Document Text:

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-1935

In Re: CATHERINE DENISE RANDOLPH,

Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge. 

(1:15-mc-00369)

Submitted: January 21, 2016 Decided: March 22, 2016

Before NIEMEYER and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Catherine Denise Randolph, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 15-1935 Doc: 25 Filed: 03/22/2016 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Catherine Denise Randolph appeals the district court’s 

order issuing a prefiling injunction. We have reviewed the 

record and conclude that the court did not abuse its discretion 

issuing the injunction. Cromer v. Kraft Foods N. Am., Inc., 390 

F.3d 812, 817 (4th Cir. 2004) (stating standard of review). 

Accordingly, we grant Randolph’s motion for leave to proceed in 

forma pauperis and affirm the court’s order. We dispense with 

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Appeal: 15-1935 Doc: 25 Filed: 03/22/2016 Pg: 2 of 2