Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-04371/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-04371-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Bank of Hawaii
Defendant
Megumi Hisamatsu
Plaintiff
Kaushal Niroula
Defendant

Document Text:

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MEGUMI HISAMATSU,

Plaintiff,

 v.

KAUSHAL NIROULA, et al.

Defendants. /

No. C 07-04371 JSW

ORDER RE MISCELLANEOUS

ADMINISTRATIVE MOTIONS

AND HEARING DATE ON

MOTION TO DISMISS

The Court has received Defendant Bank of Hawaii’s miscellaneous administrative

motion for leave to file a brief in excess of fifteen pages and Plaintiff’s opposition thereto. The

Court has also received Plaintiff’s miscellaneous administrative motion for an extension of time

on the briefing schedule set by this Court and for leave to file an opposition brief in excess of

fifteen pages.

The Court HEREBY GRANTS Defendant’s request for leave to file a brief in support of

its motion to dismiss that is twenty-five pages in length. The Court shall also GRANT

Plaintiff’s request for leave to file an opposition brief that is twenty-five pages in length. All

parties are HEREBY ADVISED that in the future, requests for leave to file briefs in excess of

this Court’s page limits shall be filed in advance of the filing of any such brief. Failure to do so

shall result in oversized briefs being stricken from the record.

The Court also GRANTS IN PART Plaintiff’s request for additional time in which to

file his opposition to Defendant’s motion to dismiss. A review of the docket indicates that

Plaintiff’s counsel was not electronically served with the Order setting the briefing schedule. 

Case 3:07-cv-04371-JSW Document 34 Filed 10/12/07 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Plaintiff’s opposition brief shall be due on October 26, 2007, and Defendant’s reply brief shall

be due on November 2, 2007. If the parties wish to modify this briefing schedule, they must

submit a request or stipulation demonstrating good cause for such a request in advance of these

filing deadlines. 

The Court also notes that, in general, it does not permit telephonic appearances at

hearings on motions or at the initial case management conference. Accordingly, all counsel are

expected to appear in person at the motion hearing set for November 30, 2007 and the case

management conference set for December 14, 2007.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 12, 2007 

JEFFREY S. WHITE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:07-cv-04371-JSW Document 34 Filed 10/12/07 Page 2 of 2