Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-10-06557/USCOURTS-ca4-10-06557-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Clarence Edward Alexander
Appellant
United States of America
Appellee

Document Text:

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-6557

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

CLARENCE EDWARD ALEXANDER,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle,

District Judge. (4:95-cr-00013-BO-1)

Submitted: July 27, 2010 Decided: August 6, 2010

Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and WILKINSON and KEENAN, Circuit 

Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Clarence Edward Alexander, Appellant Pro Se. Rudolf A. Renfer, 

Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, 

for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 10-6557 Doc: 10 Filed: 08/06/2010 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Clarence Edward Alexander appeals the district court’s 

order denying his motion to reconsider the court’s earlier order 

granting his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for a 

reduction in sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no 

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. See United States v. 

Goodwyn, 596 F.3d 233, 234-46 (4th Cir. 2010) (holding that 

district court lacked authority to grant defendant’s motion to 

reconsider, filed eight months after the district court’s order 

ruling on original § 3582(c)(2) motion). We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before the court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Appeal: 10-6557 Doc: 10 Filed: 08/06/2010 Pg: 2 of 2