Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-01517/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-01517-2/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Rocky Reno Meves
Plaintiff
Chester Miller
Defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ROCKY RENO MEVES, Case No. 1:07-cv-1517 LJO TAG

Plaintiff,

ORDER TO ADOPT FINDINGS AND 

v. RECOMMENDATIONS TO DISMISS

COMPLAINT WITHOUT PREJUDICE

CHESTER MILLER, (Doc. 7)

President/C.E.O. of Rand Mining Co., etc.,

Defendants.

 _____________________________________/

On October 18, 2007, Plaintiff Rocky Reno Meves (“Meves”), a state prisoner proceeding

pro se, filed a civil rights complaint, 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (Doc. 1). The matter was referred to the

Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Local Rule 72-302. On November 8, 2007,

the Magistrate Judge screened Meves’ complaint, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. Upon finding

that the complaint failed to state a claim that the defendants, under color of state law, violated

Meves’ constitutional rights, the Magistrate Judge issued Findings and Recommendations, in

which she recommended that Meves’ complaint be dismissed without prejudice and that this

action be closed. (Doc. 7). The Magistrate Judge subsequently denied Meves’ motion for an

extension of time to file objections to the Findings and Recommendations. (Doc. 11). Thus,

there are no objections to the Findings and Recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), Federal Rule of Civil

Procedure 72(b), and Local Rule 72-304, this Court has conducted a de novo review of the case. 

Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court concludes that the Findings and

Recommendations filed on November 8, 2007, are supported by the record and by the Magistrate

Judge’s analysis.

Case 1:07-cv-01517-LJO -TAG Document 12 Filed 12/07/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations (Doc. 7), filed November 8, 2007, are

ADOPTED IN FULL;

2. This action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; and

3. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to close this case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: December 7, 2007 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill 

66h44d UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:07-cv-01517-LJO -TAG Document 12 Filed 12/07/07 Page 2 of 2