Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca5-06-31093/USCOURTS-ca5-06-31093-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Mauro Alejandro Haro-Torres
Appellant
United States of America
Appellee

Document Text:

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

June 21, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

REVISED JULY 15, 2010

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 06-31093

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

MAURO ALEJANDRO HARO-TORRES, also known as Julian Montez, 

also known as Jose Rivera-Garcia, also known as Luis Rojo 

Lopez, also known as Mario Flores, also known as Julian 

Montez Villegas, also known as Luis Fojo Lopez, also known 

as Luis Rojo, also known as Mario Lopez-Gomez, also known as

Julian Montes-Villegas, also known as Julian Montes 

Villehas, also known as Jullan Montez Villegas, also known 

as Mauro Alejandr Torez, also known as Mario Gomez-Lopez, 

also known as Fernando Medivil Zavala, also known as Juli 

Villegas, also known as Julian Motes-Villegas, 

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Louisiana

USDC No. 2:06-CR-131-ALL

--------------------

Before SMITH, DeMOSS and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Mauro

Alejandro Haro-Torres has moved for leave to withdraw and has

filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S.

 Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that *

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

 Case: 06-31093 Document: 00511174065 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/15/2010
No. 06-31093

-2-

738 (1967). Haro-Torres has not filed a response. Our

independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no

nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for

leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further

responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH

CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 06-31093 Document: 00511174065 Page: 2 Date Filed: 07/15/2010