Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-00297/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-00297-2/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
JDS Builders Group, Inc.
Plaintiff
Scottsdale Insurance Company
Defendant

Document Text:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

 , CASE NO. ______________________

Plaintiff(s), 

 

v. STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]

ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS 

 ,

Defendant(s).

_______________________________/

Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the

following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5: 

The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process: 

Court Processes:

Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4)

Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5)

Mediation (ADR L.R. 6)

(Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is

appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any other form of ADR must participate in an

ADR phone conference and may not file this form. They must instead file a Notice of Need for

ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5) 

Private Process:

Private ADR (please identify process and provider) ______________________

_____________________________________________________________________________

The parties agree to hold the ADR session by: 

the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the order

referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered. ) 

other requested deadline _____________________________________________

Dated:___________ ____________________________

Attorney for Plaintiff

Dated:____________ ____________________________

Attorney for Defendant

CONTINUE TO FOLLOWING PAGE

JDS Builders Group, Inc.,

3:15-cv-00297-vc

Scottsdale Insurance

Company, et al.

✔

✔

mediation; provider TBA

5/5/2015 /s/ Brandt L. Wolkin

5/5/2015 /s/ Joshua S. Leach

Case 3:15-cv-00297-VC Document 34 Filed 05/08/15 Page 1 of 3
[PROPOSED] ORDER

The parties’ stipulation is adopted and IT IS SO ORDERED.

The parties’ stipulation is modified as follows, and IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: __________________________________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

When filing this document in ECF, please be sure to use the appropriate Docket

Event, e.g., “Stipulation and Proposed Order Selecting Mediation.”

Rev. 12/11

Page 2 of 2

DISTRICT

XX May 8, 2015

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Vince Chhabria

Case 3:15-cv-00297-VC Document 34 Filed 05/08/15 Page 2 of 3
1.

SIGNATURE ATTESTATION CASE NO. 3:15-CV-00297 VC

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

SIGNATURE ATTESTATION 

I hereby attest that I have authorization to sign on behalf of counsel whose signatures 

are indicated by a conformed signature (/s/) within this e-filed document.

Dated: May 5, 2015 WOLKIN • CURRAN, LLP

/s/ Brandt L. Wolkin

By: 

Brandt L. Wolkin

Jennifer L. Elowsky

Attorneys for Plaintiff,

NAVIGATORS SPECIALTY 

INSURANCE COMPANY

Case 3:15-cv-00297-VC Document 34 Filed 05/08/15 Page 3 of 3