Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_09-cv-02661/USCOURTS-caed-2_09-cv-02661-4/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Commissioner of Social Security
Defendant
Colleen M. Schenkel
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

COLLEEN M. SCHENKEL, No. CIV S-09-2661-CMK

Plaintiff, 

vs. ORDER

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL 

SECURITY,

Defendant.

 /

Plaintiff, who is proceeding with retained counsel, brings this action for judicial

review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). 

Pursuant to the court’s scheduling order, plaintiff is required to prosecute this

action by either seeking voluntary remand or filing a dispositive motion within 45 days from the

date of service of the administrative record by defendant. Plaintiff was warned that failure to

comply may result in dismissal of this action for lack of prosecution and failure to comply with

court rules and orders. See Local Rule 110. A review of the docket reflects that the answer and

certified administrative record were served on February 26, 2010. To date, plaintiff has not filed

a dispositive motion. 

Case 2:09-cv-02661-CMK Document 17 Filed 07/23/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

A review of the docket also reflects that, while defendant has notified the court

regarding consent to proceed before a Magistrate Judge, plaintiff has not notified the court

regarding consent. Pursuant to the court’s scheduling order and Eastern District of California

Local Rules, Appendix A, the time to do so has now expired. 

Plaintiff shall show cause in writing, within 30 days of the date of this order, why

this action should not be dismissed for failure to file a dispositive motion. Plaintiff shall also

show cause in writing, within 30 days of the date of this order, why this action should not be

dismissed for failure to inform the court regarding consent to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction, as

required by the court’s scheduling order. The Clerk of the Court is directed to serve on plaintiff a

copy of the court’s form entitled “Consent to Assignment or Request for Reassignment.” 

Plaintiff is warned that failure to respond to this order may result in the dismissal of the action

for the reasons discussed above, as well as for failure to prosecute and comply with court rules

and orders. See Local Rule 11-110.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: July 22, 2010

______________________________________

CRAIG M. KELLISON

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:09-cv-02661-CMK Document 17 Filed 07/23/10 Page 2 of 2