Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_08-cv-01463/USCOURTS-caed-1_08-cv-01463-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Alberto R. Gonzalez
Respondent
Linden Graham
Petitioner

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LINDEN GRAHAM,

Petitioner,

v.

ALBERTO R. GONZALEZ,

Respondent.

 /

1:08-cv-01463-AWI-SMS (HC)

ORDER RESOLVING PETITIONER’S

MOTION OF INQUIRY AND DIRECTING

CLERK OF COURT TO SEND PETITIONER

COPY OF COURT’S OCTOBER 6, 2008,

ORDER

[Doc. 5]

On September 29, 2008, Petitioner filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 2241. On October 6, 2008, the Honorable Anthony W. Ishii dismissed the petition

for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and judgment was entered. (Court Docs. 3, 4.) 

1

Now pending before the Court is Petitioner’s motion for the status of this case, filed on

July 9, 2009. (Court Doc. 5.) Petitioner is advised that on October 6, 2008, the instant petition

for writ of habeas corpus was dismissed pursuant to the Section 106 of the READ ID Act, which

eliminated this Court’s jurisdiction to review final orders of removal-the challenge raised by

Petitioner in the instant petition. On this same date, the order was properly served on Petitioner

at his address of record, which is effective service. (See Local Rule 182(f); Court. Doc. 3.) 2

Because Petitioner contends that he is not aware of the status of this case, the Court will direct

the Clerk’s office to send Petitioner an additional copy of the Court’s October 6, 2008,

This order was properly served on Petitioner at his address of record. (See Court Doc. 3.)

1

The Court notes that no notice of address change has been filed.

2

1

Case 1:08-cv-01463-AWI -SMS Document 6 Filed 01/05/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

dismissing the instant petition. 

Based on the foregoing, it is HEREBY ORDERED that:

 1. Petitioner’s motion for review of the instant petition is DENIED as MOOT; and,

2. The Clerk of Court is directed to send Petitioner an additional copy of the Court’s

October 6, 2008, to Petitioner. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 5, 2010 /s/ Sandra M. Snyder 

icido3 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

2

Case 1:08-cv-01463-AWI -SMS Document 6 Filed 01/05/10 Page 2 of 2