Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_19-cv-05691/USCOURTS-cand-3_19-cv-05691-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Carl A.R. Hitler
Plaintiff
People of the State of California
Defendant
Carl Arthur Renowitzky
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CARL ARTHUR RENOWITZKY, aka 

CARL A.R. HITLER,

Plaintiff,

v.

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF 

CALIFORNIA,

Defendant.

Case No. 19-cv-05691-WHO (PR) 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

Dkt. No. 1

Plaintiff sent a motion to the Court regarding various matters. Because a motion 

alone cannot properly initiate a lawsuit, the Court sent a Clerk’s Notice advising him to file 

a complaint on the proper form (and an application to proceed in forma pauperis) by 

October 18, 2019. Plaintiff has failed to comply with the Clerk’s Notice. Accordingly, the 

action is DISMISSED (without prejudice) for failing to comply with the Clerk’s Notice 

and for failing to prosecute, see Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).

Because this dismissal is without prejudice, plaintiff may move to reopen. Any 

such motion must contain (i) a complaint on this Court’s form; and (ii) a complete 

application to proceed in forma pauperis (or full payment for the $400.00 filing fee). 

Plaintiff’s “Ex Parte Motion for Felony Violations Upon Those In Authority That 

Obstruct Justice” is DENIED as moot. (Dkt. No. 1.) 

The Clerk shall terminate all pending motions, enter judgment in favor of defendant 

and close the file.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 30, 2019

_________________________

WILLIAM H. ORRICK

United States District Judge

Case 3:19-cv-05691-WHO Document 4 Filed 10/30/19 Page 1 of 1