Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_24-cv-02159/USCOURTS-caed-2_24-cv-02159-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Nicholas Raymond Prout
Plaintiff
Unknown
Defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

NICHOLAS RAYMOND PROUT,

Plaintiff,

v.

UNKNOWN,

Defendant.

No. 2:24-cv-2159 CSK P

ORDER & FINDINGS & 

RECOMMENDATIONS

By order filed August 15, 2024, plaintiff was granted thirty days to file a complaint and an 

application to proceed in forma pauperis. (ECF No. 8.) Thirty days from that date have now 

passed, and plaintiff has not filed a complaint or an application to proceed in forma pauperis. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk shall assign a district judge to 

this action.

IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See

Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 

after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections 

with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned 

“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that 

Case 2:24-cv-02159-DJC-CSK Document 11 Filed 09/20/24 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District 

Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 

Dated: September 20, 2024

Pr2159.fta

2

Case 2:24-cv-02159-DJC-CSK Document 11 Filed 09/20/24 Page 2 of 2