Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-01307/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-01307-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
California Sportfishing Protection Alliance
Plaintiff
Monierlifetile LLC
Defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 

734307.1 1 

STIPULATION TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE; [PROPOSED] ORDER 

MICHAEL R. LOZEAU (Cal. Bar No. 142893) 

Law Office of Michael R. Lozeau 

1516 Oak Street, Suite 216 

Alameda, CA 94501 

Tel: (510) 749-9102 

Fax: (510) 749-9103 

E-mail: mrlozeau@lozeaulaw.com

ANDREW L. PACKARD (Cal. Bar No. 168690) 

MICHAEL P. LYNES (Cal. Bar No. 230462) 

Law Offices of Andrew L. Packard 

294 Page Street 

San Francisco, CA 94102 

Tel: (415) 431-2970 

Fax: (415) 431-0410 

E-mail: packardal@mindspring.com

Attorneys for Plaintiff CALIFORNIA 

SPORTFISHING PROTECTION ALLIANCE 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

CALIFORNIA SPORTFISHING 

PROTECTION ALLIANCE, a non-profit 

corporation, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

MONIERLIFETILE LLC, a limited 

liability corporation, 

Defendant. 

Case No. 2:05-CV-01307-GEB-GGH 

STIPULATION TO DISMISS 

PLAINTIFFS’ CLAIMS WITH 

PREJUDICE; [PROPOSED] ORDER 

GRANTING DISMISSAL WITH 

PREJUDICE [FRCP 41(a)(1)(ii)] 

WHEREAS, on February 24, 2005 Plaintiff California Sportfishing Protection Alliance 

(“CSPA”) provided Defendant MonierLifetile LLC (“MonierLifetile”) with a Notice of 

Violations and Intent to File Suit (“Notice”) under Clean Water Act §505, 33 U.S.C. §1365. 

WHEREAS, on June 28, 2005 CSPA filed its Complaint against MonierLifetile in this 

Court, California Sportfishing Protection Alliance v. MonierLifetile LLC, Case No. 2:05-CV01307-GEB-GGH. Said Complaint incorporates by reference all of the allegations contained in 

CSPA’s Notice. 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 2:05-cv-01307-GEB-GGH Document 16 Filed 03/16/06 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 

734307.1 2 

STIPULATION TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE; [PROPOSED] ORDER 

WHEREAS, CSPA and MonierLifetile, through their authorized representatives and 

without either adjudication of CSPA’s claims or admission by MonierLifetile of any alleged 

violation or other wrongdoing, have chosen to resolve in full by way of settlement the allegations 

of CSPA as set forth in the Notice and Complaint, thereby avoiding the costs and uncertainties of 

further litigation. A copy of the Settlement Agreement and Mutual Release of Claims 

(“Settlement Agreement”) entered into by and between CSPA and MonierLifetile is attached 

hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated by reference. 

WHEREAS, the parties submitted the Settlement Agreement via certified mail, return 

receipt requested, to the U.S. EPA and the U.S. Department of Justice and the 45 day review 

period set forth at 40 C.F.R. § 135.5 has completed. 

NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED and agreed to by and between the 

parties that CSPA’s claims, as set forth in the Notice and Complaint, be dismissed with prejudice. 

The parties respectfully request an order from this Court dismissing such claims with prejudice. 

In accordance with paragraphs 2, 19, and 20 of the Settlement Agreement, the parties also request 

that this Court maintain jurisdiction over the parties through June 30, 2006 for the sole purpose of 

resolving any disputes between the parties with respect to enforcement of any provision of the 

Settlement Agreement. 

Dated: ____________________, 2006 LAW OFFICE OF MICHAEL R. LOZEAU 

By: 

Michael R. Lozeau 

Attorney for Plaintiff 

Dated: ____________________, 2006 DOWNEY BRAND LLP 

By: 

Nicole E. Granquist 

Attorney for Defendant 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 2:05-cv-01307-GEB-GGH Document 16 Filed 03/16/06 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 

734307.1 1 

STIPULATION TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE; [PROPOSED] ORDER 

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

Good cause appearing, and the parties having stipulated and agreed, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff California Sportfishing Protection Alliance’s 

claims against Defendant MonierLifetile LLC, as set forth in the Notice and Complaint filed in 

Case No. 2:05-CV-01307-GEB-GGH, are hereby dismissed with prejudice. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court shall retain jurisdiction over the parties 

through June 30, 2006 for the sole purpose of enforcing compliance by the parties of the terms of 

the Settlement Agreement, attached to the parties’ Stipulation to Dismiss as Exhibit A. 

IT IS SO ORDERED 

DATED: March 16, 2006 

 /s/ Garland E. Burrell, Jr. 

 GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR. 

 United States District Judge 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 2:05-cv-01307-GEB-GGH Document 16 Filed 03/16/06 Page 3 of 3