Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_18-cv-03062/USCOURTS-caed-2_18-cv-03062-5/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
California Bureau of Automotive Repair
Defendant
Charles Scales
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CHARLES SCALES,

Plaintiff,

v. 

CALIFORNIA BUREAU OF

AUTOMOTIVE REPAIR, 

Defendant. 

No. 2:18-cv-03062-MCE-CKD PS

ORDER

On January 24, 2020, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 

which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings 

and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. No objections were filed.

 Accordingly, the court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United 

States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are 

reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 

1983). 

 The court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and, good cause appearing, 

concludes that it is appropriate to adopt the Proposed Findings and Recommendations in full. 

////

////

////

Case 2:18-cv-03062-MCE-CKD Document 20 Filed 03/25/20 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that:

1. The Proposed Findings and Recommendations filed January 24, 2020, are ADOPTED.

2. This action is dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: March 24, 2020 

Case 2:18-cv-03062-MCE-CKD Document 20 Filed 03/25/20 Page 2 of 2