Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_10-cv-00054/USCOURTS-caed-2_10-cv-00054-3/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Katheleen L. Dickinson
Respondent
Hung Duong Nguon
Petitioner

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

HUNG DUONG NGUON, No. CIV S-10-0054-CMK-P

Petitioner, 

vs. ORDER

KATHELEEN L. DICKINSON,

Respondent.

 /

Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this petition for a writ of

habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner has consented to Magistrate Judge

jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) and no other party has been served or appeared in the

action. 

On February 11, 2010, the court directed petitioner to submit either a completed

application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis or the full filing fee for this action within 30

days. Petitioner failed to do so, and the court issued an order to show cause, on April 22, 2010,

requiring Petitioner to show cause why this action should not be dismissed for failure to resolve

the fee status. Petitioner responded to the order to show cause on May 25, 2010, stating his

belief that a family member had paid the filing fee, and requested additional time to follow up

Case 2:10-cv-00054-CMK Document 9 Filed 07/14/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

and pay the filing fee. The court therefore discharged the order to show cause on June 1, 2010,

and provided Petitioner with another 30 days in which to resolve the fee status. Petitioner was

again warned that failure to comply may result in dismissal of this action for lack of prosecution

and failure to comply with court rules and orders. See Local Rule 110. To date, no filing fee has

been received by the court, nor has a completed application for leave to proceed in forma

pauperis. Petitioner has failed to resolve the fee status. 

Therefore, Petitioner shall show cause in writing, within 30 days of the date of

this order, why this action should not be dismissed for failure to resolve the fee status for this

case. Petitioner is again warned that failure to respond to this order may result in dismissal of the

action for the reasons outlined above, as well as for failure to prosecute and comply with court

rules and orders. See id.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: July 13, 2010

______________________________________

CRAIG M. KELLISON

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:10-cv-00054-CMK Document 9 Filed 07/14/10 Page 2 of 2