Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_19-cv-02413/USCOURTS-caed-2_19-cv-02413-2/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Rodrick Harris
Petitioner
Sacramento County Superior Court
Respondent

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RODRICK HARRIS,

Petitioner,

v.

SACRAMENTO COUNTY SUPERIOR 

COURT,

Respondents.

No. 2:19-cv-02413-TLN-KJN

ORDER

Rodrick Harris (“Petitioner”), a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application 

for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United 

States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On January 13, 2020, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 

which were served on Petitioner and which contained notice to Petitioner that any objections to 

the Findings and Recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 7.) 

Petitioner has not filed objections to the Findings and Recommendations.

Accordingly, the Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. 

United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are 

reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 

1983); see also 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). 

Case 2:19-cv-02413-TLN-KJN Document 9 Filed 04/08/20 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Having reviewed the file under the applicable legal standards, the Court finds the Findings 

and Recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. 

1. The findings and recommendations filed January 13, 2020 (ECF No. 7), are adopted in 

full;

2. Petitioner’s application for a writ of habeas corpus is DISMISSED for failure to 

exhaust state remedies.

3. The Court declines to issue the certificate of appealability referenced in 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2253. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: April 7, 2020

Case 2:19-cv-02413-TLN-KJN Document 9 Filed 04/08/20 Page 2 of 2