Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-00824/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-00824-8/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Juan Carlos Ayala Sanchez
Petitioner
Placer County Superior Court
Respondent

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JUAN CARLOS AYALA SANCHEZ, 

Petitioner, No. CIV S-06-0824 LKK GGH P

vs.

PLACER COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, 

Respondents. ORDER

 /

 Petitioner, a former state prisoner proceeding with appointed counsel, has filed

a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Following appointment of

counsel for petitioner, petitioner was evidently deported to Mexico upon being paroled from

Calipatria State Prison in August of 2006. Upon filing a first amended petition on November 19,

2006, petitioner’s counsel also moved the court for a stay and abeyance of the proceedings

pending exhaustion of certain of petitioner’s claims in state court. Subsequently, petitioner’s

counsel filed a notice, on March 2, 2007, that petitioner’s claims have since been exhausted in

the California Supreme Court.

Petitioner wishes to proceed in this habeas matter because “[w]ere petitioner to

return to the United States he would be subject to the terms of parole as well as the requirement

that he register as a sexual offender pursuant to Penal Code section 290.” First Amended

Case 2:06-cv-00824-ALA -GGH Document 25 Filed 03/27/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

Petition, p. 2. Petitioner’s counsel must inform the court whether or not petitioner was deported

only as a result of the conviction at issue in this petition. In other words, it is unclear whether,

absent the conviction/sentence petitioner challenges by this petition, petitioner could legally reenter this country. 

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that:

1. Petitioner’s November 19, 2006, motion for a stay and abeyance pending

exhaustion of claims in state court is denied as moot;

2. Petitioner’s counsel is directed to inform the court, within 30 days, of the basis

for petitioner’s removal/deportation. 

DATED: 3/27/07 /s/ Gregory G. Hollows

GREGORY G. HOLLOWS

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

GGH:009

 sanc0824.ord

Case 2:06-cv-00824-ALA -GGH Document 25 Filed 03/27/07 Page 2 of 2