Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca5-15-20226/USCOURTS-ca5-15-20226-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
United States of America
Appellee
Tron Washington
Appellant

Document Text:

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-20226

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

TRON WASHINGTON,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:99-CR-430-1

Before JOLLY, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Tron Washington has moved for 

leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 

386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). 

Washington has not filed a response. 

During the pendency of this appeal, Washington completed the 14-month 

sentence imposed upon revocation of supervised release and was released from 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

June 7, 2016

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 15-20226 Document: 00513537066 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/07/2016
No. 15-20226

2

custody. Because no additional term of supervised release was imposed, the 

instant appeal is moot. See Spencer v. Kemna, 523 U.S. 1, 7 (1998); United 

States v. Clark, 193 F.3d 845, 847-48 (5th Cir. 1999). Accordingly, the appeal 

is DISMISSED as moot, and counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is DENIED 

as unnecessary.

 Case: 15-20226 Document: 00513537066 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/07/2016