Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cr-00284/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cr-00284-12/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Mohammad Adil
Defendant
Akram Sabar Chaudhry
Defendant
Adil Mohammad
Defendant
Akram Sabar
Defendant
USA
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

KEVIN V. RYAN (CASBN 118321)

United States Attorney

EUMI L. CHOI (WVSBN 0722)

Chief, Criminal Division

BLAKE D. STAMM (CTBN 301887)

Assistant United States Attorney

450 Golden Gate Avenue, Box 36055

San Francisco, California 94102

Telephone: (415) 436-7210

Fax: (415) 436-7234

Attorneys for Plaintiff

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

AKRAM SABAR CHAUDHRY,

a.k.a. Akram Sabar, and 

MOHAMMAD ADIL

a.k.a. Adil Mohammad,

 

Defendants.

 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CR 05 00284 SI

[PROPOSED] ORDER AND

STIPULATION FOR CONTINUANCE

FROM APRIL 21, 2006 TO APRIL 28,

2006 AND EXCLUDING TIME FROM

THE SPEEDY TRIAL ACT

CALCULATION (18 U.S.C. §

3161(h)(8)(A))

With the agreement of the parties, and with the consent of the defendants, the Court

enters this order continuing a scheduling and trial setting appearance before the district court

from April 21, 2006 to April 28, 2006 at 11:15 A.M. before the Honorable Susan Illston, and

documenting the defendant’s exclusion of time under the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161(b),

from April 21, 2006 to April 28, 2006. The parties agree, and the Court finds and holds, as

follows:

1. Government counsel will commence a felony prosecution trial before the Honorable

Marilyn Hall Patel on April 18, 2006. Trial will likely not be completed until April 24, 2006. 

Case 3:05-cr-00284-SI Document 58 Filed 04/12/2006 Page 1 of 2
 Case 3:05-cr-00284-SI Document 59 Filed 04/12/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

2. All parties agree to an exclusion of time under the Speedy Trial Act. Failure to grant the

requested continuance would unreasonably deny the government continuity of counsel and 

reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due

diligence.

3. Given these circumstances, the Court finds that the ends of justice served by excluding the

period from April 21, 2006 to April 28, 2006, outweigh the best interest of the public and the

defendants in a speedy trial. § 3161(h)(8)(A).

4. Accordingly, and with the consent of the defendants, the Court orders that the period from

April 21, 2006 to April 28, 2006 be excluded from Speedy Trial Act calculations under 18

U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(A) & (B)(iv).

IT IS SO STIPULATED:

DATED: April 11, 2006 _______________/S________________

STEVEN F. GRUEL, ESQ.

Attorney for Defendant Chaudhry

DATED: April 11, 2006 ________________/S_______________

DAVID L. ANDERSON, ESQ.

Attorney for Defendant Adil

DATED: April 11, 2006 ________________/S_______________

BLAKE D. STAMM 

Assistant United States Attorney

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: ______________ _______________________________

HON. SUSAN ILLSTON

United States District Judge

Case 3:05-cr-00284-SI Document 58 Filed 04/12/2006 Page 2 of 2
 Case 3:05-cr-00284-SI Document 59 Filed 04/12/06 Page 2 of 2