Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-01873/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-01873-5/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Deborah Patrick
Respondent
Anila Podana
Petitioner

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ANILA PODANA,

Petitioner, No. CIV S-07-1873 FCD DAD P

vs.

DEBORAH PATRICK, Warden,

Respondent. ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

 /

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with an application for writ of

habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On January 28, 2008, respondent filed a motion to

dismiss the petition as barred by the applicable statute of limitations. Petitioner has not filed an

opposition to the motion. Local Rule 78-230(m) provides in part: “Failure of the responding

party to file written opposition or to file a statement of no opposition may be deemed a waiver of

any opposition to the granting of the motion . . . .” 

Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that within twenty days of

being served with this order petitioner shall file an opposition, if any, to respondent’s motion to

/////

/////

/////

Case 2:07-cv-01873-FCD-DAD Document 16 Filed 03/14/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

 If petitioner no longer wishes to proceed with this action, she should file a request that 1

it be dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

2

dismiss and show cause why respondent’s January 28, 2008 motion to dismiss should not be

granted. 

1

DATED: March 13, 2008.

DAD:9

poda1873.osc

Case 2:07-cv-01873-FCD-DAD Document 16 Filed 03/14/08 Page 2 of 2