Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-00877/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-00877-6/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
D. Adams
Respondent
Kenneth Wayne Krantz
Petitioner

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KENNETH WAYNE KRANTZ,

Petitioner,

v.

D. ADAMS, Warden,

Respondent.

 /

CV F 06-00877 LJO DLB HC

ORDER GRANTING RESPONDENT’S

REQUEST TO WITHDRAW MOTION TO

DISMISS AND GRANTING MOTION FOR

ADDITIONAL FIFTEEN DAYS TO FILE AN

ANSWER

ORDER DISREGARDING RESPONDENT’S

REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO

FILE FURTHER BRIEFING AS MOOT

[Docs. 17, 18]

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. 

On July 11, 2006, Petitioner filed the instant federal petition for writ of habeas corpus

challenging the Board’s July 29, 2003, decision. On November 13, 2006, Respondent filed a

motion to dismiss the instant petition as time-barred. Petitioner filed an opposition on December

7, 2006. 

On May 16, 2007, the Court directed Respondent to submit a reply to Petitioner’s

opposition. (Court Doc. 10.) Respondent filed its reply on August 2, 2007. (Court Doc. 14.) 

Petitioner filed a sur-reply on August 27, 2007. (Court Doc. 15.) 

On August 31, 2007, the Court issued a second order directing Respondent to submit

further briefing addressing the claims raised by Petitioner in his sur-reply. (Court Doc. 16.) 

On September 20, 2007, Respondent filed a request for an extension of time to further its

Case 1:06-cv-00877-LJO -DLB Document 19 Filed 10/03/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

briefing. (Court Doc. 17.) Then on October 2, 2007, Respondent filed a motion to withdraw its

motion to dismiss, filed on October 2, 2007. (Court Doc. 18.)

In his motion to withdraw, Respondent concedes that the instant petition is timely and

requests an additional fifteen days to and including, October 17, 2007, to file an answer to the

petition. Respondent’s request is granted.

Based on the foregoing, it is HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Respondent’s motion to withdraw its motion to dismiss, filed on November 13,

2006, is GRANTED;

2. Respondent’s request for an extension of time to file an answer is GRANTED, to

and including October 17, 2007; and

3. Respondent’s motion for an extension of time to file further briefing is

DISREGARDED as MOOT, as the motion to dismiss has been withdrawn.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: October 3, 2007 /s/ Dennis L. Beck 

3b142a UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-00877-LJO -DLB Document 19 Filed 10/03/07 Page 2 of 2