Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-16-01926/USCOURTS-ca4-16-01926-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Clotilde C. Jimenez
Appellant
Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc.
Appellee
Shapiro & Brown, LLP
Appellee
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Appellee

Document Text:

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-1926

CLOTILDE C. JIMENEZ,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.; SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING, INC.; 

SHAPIRO & BROWN, LLP,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior

District Judge. (1:16-cv-00624-CMH-MSN)

Submitted: January 10, 2017 Decided: March 9, 2017

Before THACKER and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Clotilde C. Jimenez, Appellant Pro Se. Brian Montgomery 

Barnwell, Matthew Douglas Patterson, NELSON MULLINS RILEY & 

SCARBOROUGH, LLP, Columbia, South Carolina, Nathan Ira Brown, 

NELSON MULLINS RILEY & SCARBOROUGH, LLP, Huntington, West 

Virginia, Sarah Reimers McIntee, NELSON MULLINS RILEY & 

SCARBOROUGH, LLP, Washington, D.C., for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 16-1926 Doc: 18 Filed: 03/09/2017 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Clotilde C. Jimenez appeals the district court’s order 

granting Defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint. We have 

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, 

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See

Jimenez v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., No. 1:16-cv-00624-CMH-MSN 

(E.D. Va. filed July 26, 2016; entered July 27, 2016). We grant 

leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before this court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Appeal: 16-1926 Doc: 18 Filed: 03/09/2017 Pg: 2 of 2