Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-02669/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-02669-3/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Black Diamond Asphalt, Inc.
Cross Claimant
Kinsale Insurance Company
Cross Defendant
Desiree Myers
Defendant
Raymond Myers
Defendant
Polar Corporation
Defendant
Polar Tank Trailer LLC
Defendant
The Reed Leasing Group LLC
Defendant
United Financial Casualty Company
Cross Defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

30

31

1

Order CASE NO.: 2:15-cv-02669-MCE-EFB

Susan F. Halman, State Bar No. 111511

Nancy J. Strout, State Bar No. 121096

SELVIN WRAITH HALMAN LLP

505 14th Street, Suite 1200

Oakland, CA 94612

Telephone: (510) 874-1811

Facsimile: (510) 465-8976

E-mail: shalman@selvinwraith.com

nstrout@selvinwraith.com

Attorneys for Defendant and Cross-Defendant,

KINSALE INSURANCE COMPANY

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED FINANCIAL CASUALTY 

COMPANY,

Plaintiff,

v.

BLACK DIAMOND ASPHALT, INC.; POLAR 

CORPORATION; POLAR TANK TRAILER 

LLC; THE REED LEASING GROUP LLC; 

RAYMOND MYERS; DESIREE MYERS; and 

KINSALE INSURANCE COMPANY,

Defendants.

CASE NO.: 2:15-cv-02669-MCE-EFB

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

Complaint Filed: December 24, 2015

BLACK DIAMOND ASPHALT, INC.,

Cross-Claimant,

v.

UNITED FINANCIAL CASUALTY 

COMPANY, KINSALE INSURANCE 

COMPANY,

Cross-Defendants.

Cross-Claim Filed: February 16, 2016

Based on the stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing, the court orders as follows:

1. United Financial Casualty Company’s Complaint (Dkt. 1) against Kinsale is dismissed 

Case 2:15-cv-02669-MCE-DB Document 33 Filed 09/19/16 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

30

31

2

Order CASE NO.: 2:15-cv-02669-MCE-EFB

with prejudice;

2. Black Diamond Asphalt, Inc.’s Cross-Claim (Dkt. 8) against Kinsale is dismissed with 

prejudice;

3. Each party shall bear its own costs; and

4. The entire action is dismissed with prejudice.

5. The matter having been concluded in its entirety, the Clerk of Court is directed to 

close the file.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 17, 2016

Case 2:15-cv-02669-MCE-DB Document 33 Filed 09/19/16 Page 2 of 2