Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_08-cv-01801/USCOURTS-caed-1_08-cv-01801-14/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Merced Irrigation District
Defendant
Lamonte Tumbling
Plaintiff

Document Text:

Tumbling vs. Merced Irrigation District Page 1

United States District Court, Eastern District of California, Fresno Division, Case No. 1:08-CV-01801 LJO DLB

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] SCHEDULING ORDER

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DALEY & HEFT, ATTORNEYS AT LAW

Neal S. Meyers, Esq.(SBN 109625)

Matthew T. Racine, Esq. (SBN 256865)

462 Stevens Avenue, Suite 201

Solana Beach, CA 92075

Tel: (858) 755-5666

Fax: (858) 755-7870

ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT, 

MERCED IRRIGATION DISTRICT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Eastern District of California

Fresno Division

LaMonte Tumbling,

 

 Plaintiff, 

vs.

Merced Irrigation District, a public entity, 

 Defendant. 

No. 1:08-CV-01801 LJO DLB 

JOINT STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF

LITIGATION DEADLINES AND

SCHEDULING ORDER 

///

///

Lawrence D. Murray (SBN 77536)

MURRAY & ASSOCIATES

1781 Union Street

San Francisco, CA 94123

Tel: (415) 673-0555 Fax: (415) 928-4084

Dean Gordon (SBN 61311) 

LAW OFFICES OF DEAN GORDON

1220 East Olive Avenue

Fresno, CA 93728

Tel: (559) 221-7777 Fax: (559) 221-5812 

ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF 

LAMONTE TUMBLING

Case 1:08-cv-01801-LJO-DLB Document 85 Filed 04/14/10 Page 1 of 3
Tumbling vs. Merced Irrigation District Page 2

United States District Court, Eastern District of California, Fresno Division, Case No. 1:08-CV-01801 LJO DLB

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] SCHEDULING ORDER

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

LaMonte Tumbling (“Plaintiff”) and Merced Irrigation District (“Defendant”), by and through their 

respective attorneys of record, hereby stipulate to and request the Court enter a scheduling order revising 

the amended scheduling order entered by this court on February 12, 2010. (See Joint Stipulation and 

Order attached as Exhibit A). 

The revisions to the scheduling order are as follows: 

(a) Extend the completion date for the taking of the non-expert deposition of Trudy Largent by 

30 days from April 15, 2010, to May, 14, 2010. 

Good cause exists to extend the deposition discovery deadline for Trudy Largent by 30 days in light of:

(a) Ms. Trudy Largent is not available for deposition on the date noticed by Plaintiffs on April 5, 

2010 and will not be available until after the completion date of April 15, 2010.

For these reasons, the parties respectfully request the Court modify the Pre Trial Scheduling Order so 

that it conforms to the foregoing new discovery cut-off date for the deposition of Trudy Largent.

Date: __March 30, 2010 

MURRAY & ASSOCIATES DALEY & HEFT

/s/ Lawrence D. Murray /s/ Matthew T. Racine 

Lawrence D. Murray Matthew T. Racine

Attorney for Plaintiff Attorney for Defendant 

\\\

\\\

\\\

Case 1:08-cv-01801-LJO-DLB Document 85 Filed 04/14/10 Page 2 of 3
Tumbling vs. Merced Irrigation District Page 3

United States District Court, Eastern District of California, Fresno Division, Case No. 1:08-CV-01801 LJO DLB

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] SCHEDULING ORDER

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER ON STIPULATION FOR ORDER

HAVING READ AND CONSIDERED THE FOREGOING, and good cause appearing:

The foregoing is the order of the court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 13, 2010 /s/ Dennis L. Beck 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE DEAC_Signature-END:

3b142a

Case 1:08-cv-01801-LJO-DLB Document 85 Filed 04/14/10 Page 3 of 3