Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca8-05-03197/USCOURTS-ca8-05-03197-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Shafer Contracting Co.
Appellee
Paul Stefanyshyn
Appellant

Document Text:

1

The Honorable Joan N. Ericksen, United States District Judge for the District

of Minnesota, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Jonathan

G. Lebedoff, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota, now

retired.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 05-3197

___________

Paul Stefanyshyn, *

*

Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* District of Minnesota.

Shafer Contracting Co., Inc., *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellee. *

___________

Submitted: August 3, 2006 

Filed: August 9, 2006

___________

Before MURPHY, BYE, and MELLOY, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Paul Stefanyshyn appeals the district court’s1

 dismissal of his complaint under

the Age Discrimination in Employment Act and the Missouri Human Rights Act.

Following de novo review, see Meyer v. City of Joplin, 281 F.3d 759, 760 (8th Cir.

2002) (per curiam) (standard of review), we agree with the district court that

Stefanyshyn failed to state a claim under either statute, see 29 U.S.C. § 623(a)-(c)

Appellate Case: 05-3197 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/09/2006 Entry ID: 2076434
-2-

(defining types of prohibited age discrimination); Minn. Stat. § 363A.08(2) (2004)

(defining types of prohibited discrimination). 

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________

Appellate Case: 05-3197 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/09/2006 Entry ID: 2076434