Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-00115/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-00115-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Four Kings, Inc.
Defendant
King Enterprises
Defendant
Alfonso Serna
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ALFONSO SERNA,

Plaintiff,

v.

FOUR KINGS, INC., aka KING

ENTERPRISES,

Defendants.

 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

1:06-cv-0115 OWW DLB

ORDER AFTER SCHEDULING

CONFERENCE 

Further Scheduling

Conference Date: 10/10/06

8:45 Ctrm. 3

I. Date of Scheduling Conference.

August 25, 2006.

II. Appearances Of Counsel.

Bradley A. Silva, Esq., appeared on behalf of Plaintiff.

Leo King, an individual, appeared on behalf of Defendant

Four Kings, Inc., aka King Enterprises. 

III. Status of Case.

1. The parties report that settlement negotiations are

ongoing and they have some confidence that a settlement may be

reached. 

2. There is a related case entitled Serna v. Four Kings,

Inc., Case No. 1:06-cv-00114 AWI DLB. 

Case 1:06-cv-00115-OWW -DLB Document 15 Filed 08/30/06 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

3. A Scheduling Conference is set in the related case

before Magistrate Judge Beck on August 28, 2006. The parties

agree that there is no reason at this time to proceed with a

scheduling conference in either case, except to adopt the

following schedule: on or before September 25, 2006, in the event

the case does not settle, Four Kings, Inc., shall substitute a

California attorney of its choice in place and stead of Mr.

McKinnon, Georgia counsel. 

4. There is no reason to proceed with the Scheduling

Conference in the related case as the settlement efforts are

directed toward a resolution in both cases. 

5. A Further Scheduling Conference shall be held in this

case on October 10, 2006, at 8:45 a.m. If the case has settled,

the parties need only file a written notice of settlement and no

appearance shall be required. If the case is not settled, the

parties shall submit a joint scheduling conference statement and

shall appear October 10, 2006 at the hour of 8:45 a.m. 

IV. Consolidation.

1. The parties agree that the two cases involve two

separate promissory notes and should be consolidated in the

interests of judicial economy, expedition and convenience of the

parties. Accordingly, in the event both cases do not settle by

October 10, 2006, the following consolidation order is entered,

effective October 10, 2006: Case No. 1:06-cv-0115 OWW DLB shall

be consolidated with Case No. 1:06-cv-0114 AWI DLB, for all

purposes including trial, under Case No. 1:06-cv-0114 AWI DLB and

case No. 1:06-cv-0115 OWW DLB shall be transferred to Judge

Anthony W. Ishii. 

Case 1:06-cv-00115-OWW -DLB Document 15 Filed 08/30/06 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3

2. Case No. 1:06-cv-0115 OWW DLB shall be administratively

closed and all papers shall be filed under Case No. 1:06-cv-0114

AWI DLB after October 10, 2006, the effective date of this

consolidation order. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 25, 2006 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger 

emm0d6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-00115-OWW -DLB Document 15 Filed 08/30/06 Page 3 of 3