Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_10-cv-00277/USCOURTS-caed-1_10-cv-00277-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Ronald Moore
Plaintiff
Nevada Deanza Family Limited Partnership
Defendant
Sleep Fit, Inc.
Defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Craig B. Fry, #210331

Lang, Richert & Patch

Post Office Box 40012

Fresno, California 93755-0012

(559) 228-6700 Phone

(559) 228-6727 Fax

Attorneys for Defendant, SLEEP FIT CORPORATION, erroneously sued

herein as SLEEP FIT, INC.

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RONALD MOORE, 

 Plaintiff,

 vs.

SLEEP FIT, INC., NEVADA DEANZA

FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, 

 Defendants.

Case No. 1:10-CV-00277-LJO-GSA

INITIAL STIPULATION TO EXTEND

TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

[RULE 6-144]

Defendant SLEEP FIT CORPORATION, erroneously sued herein as SLEEP FIT, INC.

(hereinafter “Sleep Fit”), by and through its counsel Lang, Richert & Patch, Defendant NEVADA

DEANZA FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP (hereinafter “Deanza”), by and through its counsel

the Law Offices of Michael J. Lampe, and Plaintiff RONALD MOORE (hereinafter “Plaintiff”), by

and through his counsel Moore Law Firm, PC, enter into the following initial stipulation to extend

time for Defendant Sleep Fit to file a responsive pleading to Plaintiff’s Complaint in the aboveentitled action. Plaintiff, Deanza and Sleep Fit hereby stipulate that:

1. Sleep Fit shall have through April 21, 2010 to file an answer and/or other responsive

pleadings/motions in response to Plaintiff’s Complaint in this action. 

-1-

INITIAL STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT [RULE 6-144]

Case 1:10-cv-00277-LJO-GSA Document 11 Filed 04/15/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2. As of the date of execution of this Stipulation, there has been one previous stipulation

to extend time in this action, whereby Deanza and Plaintiff entered into a stipulation

to extend time through April 6, 2010 for Deanza to file an initial response to

Plaintiff’s Complaint. As of the date of said stipulation executed between Plaintiff

and Deanza, Sleep Fit had not yet appeared in this action, and Sleep Fit was not a

party to such stipulation. 

3. This stipulation may be executed in counterparts. Photocopies and facsimile

signatures shall be considered originals for purposes of executing this stipulation. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

DATED: April 9, 2010 LANG, RICHERT & PATCH

By: /s/ Craig B. Fry 

CRAIG B. FRY, Attorneys for

Defendant SLEEP FITCORPORATION, erroneously

sued herein as SLEEP FIT, INC.

DATED: April 7, 2010 LAW OFFICES OF MICHAEL J. LAMPE

By: /s/ Michael P. Smith 

MICHAEL P. SMITH, Attorneys for

Defendant NEVADA DEANZA 

FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

DATED: April 7, 2010 MOORE LAW FIRM, PC

By: /s/ Tanya Eugene Levinson 

TANYA EUGENE LEVINSON, Attorneys for

 Plaintiff RONALD MOORE

IT IS SO ORDERED.

 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: April 15, 2010 /s/ Gary S. Austin 

6i0kij UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

-2-

INITIAL STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT [RULE 6-144]

Case 1:10-cv-00277-LJO-GSA Document 11 Filed 04/15/10 Page 2 of 2