Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_14-cv-01749/USCOURTS-caed-1_14-cv-01749-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
William Johnson
Plaintiff
Walmart Stores, Inc.
Defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[PROPOSED] ORDER TO DISMISS ACTION WITH PREJUDICE

LEE TRAN & LIANG LLP

Steven C. Gonzalez (Bar No. 191756)

 Steven.Gonzalez@ltlattorneys.com

Danielle R. Claxton (Bar No. 272003)

 Danielle.Claxton@ltlattorneys.com

601 S. Figueroa Street, Suite 3900

Los Angeles, CA 90017

Tel: (213) 612-8900

Fax: (213) 612-3773

Attorneys for Defendant

Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

THOMAS ANTON & ASSOCIATES

Becky M. Brooks (Bar No. 210568)

 bbrooks@tantonlaw.com

1600 G. Street

Bakersfield, CA 93301

Tel: (661) 327-7051

Fax: (661) 327-4755

Attorneys for Plaintiff

William Johnson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

WILLIAM JOHNSON, an individual,

Plaintiff,

vs.

WALMART STORES, INC., a Delaware 

Corporation, and DOES 1 to 25, inclusive,

Defendants.

CASE NO.: 1:14-cv-01749-JLT

[PROPOSED] ORDER TO 

DISMISS ACTION WITH 

PREJUDICE

(Doc. 13)

Case 1:14-cv-01749-JLT Document 14 Filed 12/15/15 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

[PROPOSED] ORDER TO DISMISS ACTION WITH PREJUDICE

On December 11, 2015, the parties filed a stipulation to dismiss the entire action. (Doc. 13) The notice 

relies upon Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, under which “the plaintiff may dismiss an action 

without a court order by filing: (i) a notice of dismissal before the opposing party serves either an answer or a 

motion for summary judgment; or (ii) a stipulation of dismissal signed by all parties who have appeared.” Fed. R. 

Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A). Once such a notice has been filed, an order of the Court is not required for the dismissal. Fed. 

R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(ii); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997). Based upon the foregoing, the 

Court ORDERS:

1. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to close this action in light of the stipulated request for 

dismissal with prejudice filed and properly signed pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: December 14, 2015 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:14-cv-01749-JLT Document 14 Filed 12/15/15 Page 2 of 2