Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cr-00168/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cr-00168-4/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Napoleon Cruz
Defendant
USA
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIP. & [PROP.] ORDER

CR 06 0168 MHP 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

NAPOLEON CRUZ,

Defendant.

 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CR 06 0168 MHP

STIPULATION AND

[PROPOSED] ORDER FINDING

EXCLUDABLE TIME

UNDER SPEEDY TRIAL ACT

18 U.S.C. § 3161 (h)(1)(F) and

(8)(A)&(B)(iv)

The above-captioned case came before the Court on September 25, 2006 for

hearing on defendant’s motion to dismiss or amend the indictment. Assistant United

States Attorney Susan Badger appeared on behalf of the government. Stephen Shaiken

and Marcia Silver appeared on behalf of defendant Napoleon Cruz, whose presence was

waived by the Court for purposes of hearing on the motion. The Court stated that it was

considering defendant’s motion, but was not prepared to rule on it. It requested that the

government file a bill of particulars in order to more fully describe the e-mails that

Case 3:06-cr-00168-MHP Document 26 Filed 10/25/06 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIP. & [PROP.] ORDER

CR 06 0168 MHP 2

constituted certain counts in the indictment. The parties and Court agreed that the

government would file its bill of particulars by October 10, 2006 and that the next hearing

in the case would take place on October 23, 2006 at 11:00 a.m. 

The Court has previously found that pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(1)(F), the

time between the filing of the motion to dismiss or amend on August 15, 2006, and the

date set for hearing on the motion on September 25, 2006 was excluded from the time

requirements of the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161.

Because the motion remains under submission and the Court has requested

additional information in order to reach a decision on the motion, the parties stipulate that

time continues to be excluded between September 25, 2006 and the next hearing on the

matter on October 23, 2006. The time is excludable pursuant to 18 U.S.C.

§ 3161(h)(1)(F), and under 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(A) & (B)(iv) in order to provide

reasonable time for the government to file the bill of particulars, taking into account due

diligence. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

DATED: 10/16/06 KEVIN V. RYAN

United States Attorney

 /s/ 

SUSAN E. BADGER

Assistant United States Attorney

DATED: 10/17/06 /s/ 

STEPHEN SHAIKEN

Counsel for defendant Napoleon Cruz

Upon the joint stipulation of the parties and for good cause appearing, IT IS

HEREBY ORDERED THAT the time between September 25, 2006 and October 23,

2006 is excluded from the time requirements of the Speedy Trial Act due to the fact that

defendant’s motion to dismiss or to amend the indictment remains under consideration by

the Court, and in order to provide reasonable time for effective preparation, taking into

Case 3:06-cr-00168-MHP Document 26 Filed 10/25/06 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIP. & [PROP.] ORDER

CR 06 0168 MHP 3

account due diligence. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(1)(F) and (8)(A) & (B)(iv).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

 

MARILYN HALL PATEL

United St

U

ates District Judge

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Marilyn H. Patel

10/24/2006

Case 3:06-cr-00168-MHP Document 26 Filed 10/25/06 Page 3 of 3