Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-04375/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-04375-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Desoto Cab Company, Inc.
Plaintiff
Mike Florio
Defendant
Flywheel Taxi
Plaintiff
Carla J. Peterman
Defendant
Michael Picker
Defendant
Liane M. Randolph
Defendant
Catherine J.K. Sandoval
Defendant

Document Text:

_________________________________________________________________________________________________ 

[PROPOSED] ORDER

- 1 - 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Shannon Seibert (CBN 240317) 

seibert@ssjblaw.com 

Joe Bautista (CBN 255708) 

joebau@ssjblaw.com 

SEIBERT & BAUTISTA

100 Pine Street, Ste. 1250 

San Francisco, CA 94111 

Tel: 415.954.9455 

Fax: 415.494.8115 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

DESOTO CAB COMPANY, INC., d/b/a 

FLYWHEEL TAXI, 

 Plaintiff, 

 vs. 

MICHAEL PICKER; MIKE FLORIO; 

CATHERINE J.K. SANDOVAL; 

CARLA J. PETERMAN; LIANE M. 

RANDOLPH, in their official capacities 

as Commissioners of the Public Utilities 

Commission of the State of California; 

and DOES 1 through 20, inclusive, 

 Defendants. 

CASE NO.: 3:15-cv-04375-JSC 

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

The Honorable Edward M. Chen 

Case 3:15-cv-04375-EMC Document 33 Filed 04/19/16 Page 1 of 2
_________________________________________________________________________________________________ 

[PROPOSED] ORDER

- 2 - 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

On April 18, 2016, Plaintiff DeSoto Cab Company d/b/a Flywheel Taxi (“Plaintiff”) and 

Defendants Michael Picker, Mike Florio, Catherine J.K. Sandoval, Carla J. Peterman, and Liane M. 

Randolph (collectively, “Defendants”), filed a Stipulated Request to Extend Time to File Opposition 

and Reply Briefing for Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss. 

Based on the stipulation of counsel, and good cause appearing, the Court sets the following 

deadlines: 

1. Plaintiff shall file its Opposition to Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss no later than May 

2, 2016; 

2. Defendants shall file their Reply to Plaintiff’s Opposition to Defendants’ Motion to 

Dismiss no later than May 16, 2016. 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: ___________, 2016 

The Honorable Edward M. Chen 

United States District Judge 

April 19

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Edward M. Chen

Case 3:15-cv-04375-EMC Document 33 Filed 04/19/16 Page 2 of 2