Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_24-cv-00435/USCOURTS-caed-1_24-cv-00435-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Daniel Gonzalez
Plaintiff
United States of America
Defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DANIEL GONZALEZ,

Plaintiff,

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Defendant.

Case No. 1: 24-cv-00435-JLT-SAB

SCHEDULING ORDER (Fed. R. Civ. P. 16)

Discovery Deadlines:

Initial Disclosures: October 18, 2024

Non-Expert Discovery: June 20, 2025

Plaintiff’s Expert Disclosure: July 25, 2025

 Defendant’s Expert Disclosure: August 27, 2025

 Supplemental/Rebuttal Expert Disclosure: 

September 12, 2025

Expert Discovery: November 7, 2025

Dispositive Motion Deadlines: 

Filing: January 9, 2026

Hearing: Pursuant to Local Rules

Pre-Trial Conference:

May 4, 2026 at 1:30 PM

Courtroom 4

Trial: July 7, 2026 at 8:30 AM

Courtroom 4

 Court Trial - 3 Days

I. Date of Scheduling Conference

The Scheduling Conference was held on October 3, 2024.

II. Appearances of Counsel

Adam Stirrup appeared by video on behalf of Plaintiff.

Case 1:24-cv-00435-JLT-SAB Document 14 Filed 10/03/24 Page 1 of 8
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Kelli Taylor and Brodie Butland appeared by video on behalf of Defendant.

III. Consent to Magistrate Judge

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), to the parties who have not consented to conduct all further 

proceedings in this case, including trial, before United States Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone, 

you should be informed that because of the pressing workload of United States district judges and 

the priority of criminal cases under the United States Constitution, you may consent to magistrate 

judge jurisdiction in an effort to have your case adjudicated in a timely and cost effective manner. 

The parties are advised that they are free to withhold consent or decline magistrate jurisdiction 

without adverse substantive consequences.

IV. Initial Disclosure under Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1)

The Parties are ordered to exchange the initial disclosures required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 

26(a)(1) on or before October 18, 2024.

V. Amendments to Pleading

The parties do not anticipate any amendments to the pleadings at this time. The parties are 

advised that filing motions and/or stipulations requesting leave to amend the pleadings does not 

reflect on the propriety of the amendment or imply good cause to modify the existing schedule, if 

necessary. All proposed amendments must (A) be supported by good cause pursuant to Fed. R.

Civ. P. 16(b) if the amendment requires any modification to the existing schedule, see Johnson v. 

Mammoth Recreations, Inc., 975 F.2d 604, 609 (9th Cir. 1992), and (B) establish, under Fed. R.

Civ. P. 15(a), that such an amendment is not (1) prejudicial to the opposing party, (2) the product 

of undue delay, (3) proposed in bad faith, or (4) futile, see Foman v. Davis, 371 U.S. 178, 182 

(1962).

VI. Discovery Plan and Cut-Off Dates

The parties are ordered to complete all non-expert discovery on or before June 20, 2025

and all expert discovery on or before November 7, 2025.

The parties are directed to disclose all expert witnesses, in writing, on or before July 25, 

2025 for Plaintiff and August 27, 2025 for Defendant and to disclose all supplemental/rebuttal

experts on or before September 12, 2025. The written designation of retained and non-retained 

Case 1:24-cv-00435-JLT-SAB Document 14 Filed 10/03/24 Page 2 of 8
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3

experts shall be made pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2), (A), (B) and (C) and shall include 

all information required thereunder. Failure to designate experts in compliance with this order 

may result in the Court excluding the testimony or other evidence offered through the experts that 

are not properly disclosed in compliance with this order.

The provisions of Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(b)(4) and (5) shall apply to all discovery relating to 

experts and their opinions. Experts must be fully prepared to be examined on all subjects and 

opinions included in the designation. Failure to comply will result in the imposition of sanctions,

which may include striking the expert designation and the exclusion of their testimony.

The provisions of Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(e) regarding a party's duty to timely supplement 

disclosures and responses to discovery requests will be strictly enforced.

The parties are cautioned that the discovery/expert cut-off deadlines are the dates by which 

all discovery must be completed. Absent good cause, discovery motions will not be heard after the 

discovery deadlines. Moreover, absent good cause, the Court will only grant relief on a discovery 

motion if the relief requested requires the parties to act before the expiration of the relevant 

discovery deadline. In other words, discovery requests and deposition notices must be served 

sufficiently in advance of the discovery deadlines to permit time for a response, time to meet and 

confer, time to prepare, file and hear a motion to compel and time to obtain relief on a motion to 

compel. Counsel are expected to take these contingencies into account when proposing discovery 

deadlines. Compliance with these discovery cutoffs requires motions to compel be filed and heard 

sufficiently in advance of the discovery cutoff so that the Court may grant effective relief within 

the allotted discovery time. A party's failure to have a discovery dispute heard sufficiently in 

advance of the discovery cutoff may result in denial of the motion as untimely.

VII. Pre-Trial Motion Schedule

Unless prior leave of Court is obtained at least seven (7) days before the filing date, all 

moving and opposition briefs or legal memorandum in civil cases shall not exceed twenty-five (25)

pages. Reply briefs filed by moving parties shall not exceed ten (10) pages. Before scheduling any 

motion, the parties must comply with all requirements set forth in Local Rule 230 and 251.

Case 1:24-cv-00435-JLT-SAB Document 14 Filed 10/03/24 Page 3 of 8
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

4

A. Non-Dispositive Pre-Trial Motions

As noted, all non-expert discovery, including motions to compel, shall be completed no 

later than June 20, 2025. All expert discovery, including motions to compel, shall be completed 

no later than November 7, 2025. Compliance with these discovery cutoffs requires motions to 

compel be filed and heard sufficiently in advance of the discovery cutoff so that the Court may 

grant effective relief within the allotted discovery time. A party’s failure to have a discovery 

dispute heard sufficiently in advance of the discovery cutoff may result in denial of the motion as 

untimely. Non-dispositive motions are heard on Wednesdays at 10:00 a.m., before Judge Stanley 

A. Boone in Courtroom 9.

In scheduling any non-dispositive motion, the Magistrate Judge may grant Applications for 

an Order Shortening Time pursuant to Local Rule 144(e). However, if counsel does not obtain an 

Order Shortening Time, the Notice of Motion must comply with Local Rule 251.

Counsel may appear and argue non-dispositive motions by video, providing a written 

request to so appear is made to the Magistrate Judge's Courtroom Clerk no later than three (3) court 

days before the noticed hearing date. In the event that more than one attorney requests to appear 

by telephone, then it shall be the obligation of the moving party(ies) to arrange and originate a 

conference call to the court. 

Discovery Disputes: If a motion is brought under Fed. R. Civ. P. 37, the parties must 

prepare and file a Joint Statement re Discovery Disagreement (“Joint Statement”) as required by 

Local Rule 251. The Joint Statement must be filed fourteen (14) calendar days before the scheduled 

hearing date. Courtesy copies of all motion-related documents, declarations, and exhibits must be 

delivered to the Clerk’s Office by 10:00 a.m. on the fourth court day prior to the scheduled hearing

date. Motions will be removed from the court’s hearing calendar if the Joint Statement is not timely 

filed or if courtesy copies are not timely delivered. In order to satisfy the meet and confer 

requirement set forth in Local Rule 251(b), the parties must confer and talk to each other in person, 

over the telephone or via video conferencing before the hearing about the discovery dispute. The 

Court may issue sanctions against the moving party or the opposing party if either party fails to

meet and confer in good faith.

Case 1:24-cv-00435-JLT-SAB Document 14 Filed 10/03/24 Page 4 of 8
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

5

B. Dispositive Pre-Trial Motions

All dispositive pre-trial motions shall be filed no later than January 9, 2026 and heard 

pursuant to the Local Rules in Courtroom 4 before United States District Judge Jennifer L. 

Thurston. In scheduling such motions, counsel shall comply with Fed. R. Civ. P 56 and Local 

Rules 230 and 260.

Motions for Summary Judgment or Summary Adjudication: Prior to filing a motion for 

summary judgment or motion for summary adjudication, the parties are ORDERED to meet, in 

person or by telephone, and confer to discuss the issues to be raised in the motion.

The purpose of the meeting shall be to: 1) avoid filing motions for summary judgment where 

a question of fact exists; 2) determine whether the respondent agrees that the motion has merit in 

whole or in part; 3) discuss whether issues can be resolved without the necessity of briefing; 4) 

narrow the issues for review by the court; 5) explore the possibility of settlement before the parties 

incur the expense of briefing a summary judgment motion; and 6) to arrive at a Joint Statement of 

Undisputed Facts.

The moving party shall initiate the meeting and provide a draft of the Joint Statement of 

Undisputed Facts. In addition to the requirements of Local Rule 260, the moving party shall 

file a Joint Statement of Undisputed Facts.

In the Notice of Motion, the moving party shall certify that the parties have met and 

conferred as ordered above or set forth a statement of good cause for the failure to meet and confer.

VIII. Pre-Trial Conference Date

The Pre-Trial conference is set for May 4, 2026 at 1:30 PM in Courtroom 4 before United 

States District Judge Jennifer L. Thurston.

The parties are ordered to file a Joint Pretrial Statement pursuant to Local Rule 

281(a)(2). The parties are further directed to submit a digital copy of their Pretrial Statement in 

Word format, directly to District Judge Jennifer L. Thurston’s chambers by email at 

JLTorders@caed.uscourts.gov. 

Counsels’ attention is directed to Rules 281 and 282 of the Local Rules for the Eastern 

Case 1:24-cv-00435-JLT-SAB Document 14 Filed 10/03/24 Page 5 of 8
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

6

District of California, as to the obligations of counsel in preparing for the pre-trial conference. The 

Court will insist upon strict compliance with those rules. In addition to the matters set forth in the 

Local Rules, the Joint Pretrial Statement shall include a Joint Statement of the Case to be used by 

the Court to explain the nature of the case to the jury during voir dire.

IX. Trial Date

Trial is set for July 7, 2026 at 8:30 AM in Courtroom 4 before United States District 

Judge Jennifer L. Thurston.

A. This is a court trial.

B. Counsels’ Estimate of Trial Time: 3 Days.

C. Counsels’ attention is directed to Local Rule 285 for the Eastern District of 

California.

X. Settlement Conference

Should the parties desire a settlement conference, they will jointly request one of the court, 

and one will be arranged. In making such request, the parties are directed to notify the court as to 

whether or not they desire the undersigned to conduct the settlement conference or to arrange for 

one before another judicial officer. 

XI. Request for Bifurcation, Appointment of Special Master, or other Techniques 

to Shorten Trial

Not applicable at this time.

XII. Related Matters Pending

There are no pending related matters.

XIII. Compliance with Federal Procedure

All counsel are expected to familiarize themselves with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 

and the Local Rules of the Eastern District of California, and to keep abreast of any amendments 

thereto. The Court must insist upon compliance with these Rules if it is to efficiently handle its 

increasing case load and sanctions will be imposed for failure to follow the Rules as provided in 

both the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Local Rules for the Eastern District of California.

Additional requirements and more detailed procedures for courtroom practice before Judge 

Case 1:24-cv-00435-JLT-SAB Document 14 Filed 10/03/24 Page 6 of 8
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

7

Stanley A. Boone can be found at the United States District Court for the Eastern District of 

California’s website (www.caed.uscourts.gov) under Judges; United States Magistrate Judge 

Stanley A. Boone (SAB). In the area entitled “Case Management Procedures,” there is a link to 

“Standard Information.” All parties and counsel shall comply with the guidelines set forth therein.

XIV. Newer Admitted Attorneys and Motions before Judge Boone

The Court reviews motions set for hearing and makes a determination whether to vacate the 

hearing if the Court deems oral argument is unnecessary. See L.R. 230(g). Recognizing the value 

and importance of training attorneys, for a motion set or to be set for hearing, the Court encourages 

the parties to consider assigning the oral argument to an attorney with seven (7) years or less 

experience out of law school. If any party provides notification that such an attorney from at least 

one side will argue the motion, the Court will go forward with the hearing as scheduled. The parties 

shall place such notification within a separately entitled section after the conclusion of the 

motion, opposition, or reply briefing. If no party provides such notice, the hearing may be vacated 

without further notice.

XV. Effect of this Order

The foregoing order represents the best estimate of the court and counsel as to the agenda 

most suitable to dispose of this case. The trial date reserved is specifically reserved for this case. 

If the parties determine at any time that the schedule outlined in this order cannot be met, counsel 

are ordered to notify the court immediately of that fact so that adjustments may be made, either by 

stipulation or by subsequent status conference.

Stipulations extending the deadlines contained herein will not be considered unless 

they are accompanied by affidavits or declarations, and where appropriate attached exhibits, 

which establish good cause for granting the relief requested. The parties are advised that due 

to the impacted nature of civil cases on the district judges in the Eastern District of California, 

Fresno Division, that stipulations to continue set dates are disfavored and will not be granted 

absent good cause. 

Lastly, should counsel or a party appearing pro se fail to comply with the directions 

as set forth above, an ex parte hearing may be held and contempt sanctions, including 

Case 1:24-cv-00435-JLT-SAB Document 14 Filed 10/03/24 Page 7 of 8
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

8

monetary sanctions, dismissal, default, or other appropriate judgment, may be imposed 

and/or ordered.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 3, 2024 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:24-cv-00435-JLT-SAB Document 14 Filed 10/03/24 Page 8 of 8