Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_02-cv-01237/USCOURTS-caed-2_02-cv-01237-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Brian Moen
Plaintiff
Cheryl Pliler
Defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BRIAN MOEN,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-02-1237 GEB KJM P

vs.

CHERYL PLILER, Warden, et al.,

Defendants. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

By an order filed March 26, 2003, this court ordered plaintiff to submit materials

for service of process. Plaintiff has not responded in any way to the court’s order.

IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without

prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations will be submitted to the United States

District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within

twenty days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file

written objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Findings

/////

/////

/////

Case 2:02-cv-01237-GEB -KJM Document 6 Filed 06/30/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified

time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153

(9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: June 29, 2005.

______________________________________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

/moen1237.fusm

Case 2:02-cv-01237-GEB -KJM Document 6 Filed 06/30/05 Page 2 of 2