Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-00650/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-00650-6/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Board for Correction of Naval Records
Respondent
Edward Starski
Petitioner

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

EDWARD STARSKI,

Plaintiff,

v.

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL 

RECORDS,

Defendant.

Case No. 14-cv-00650-RS 

ORDER

On December 12, 2014, the Board filed a motion to dismiss or, in the alternative, motion 

for summary judgment to be heard in February. Starski responded, but the Board has not yet filed 

a reply. On April 23, 2015, the parties filed a stipulation to continue the hearing until September 

24, 2015, because the Board decided to review Starski’s request to reconsider the narrative reason 

for his discharge after discovering a procedural deficiency. The Board acknowledged that the 

review may render this case and the pending motions moot. Since April 2015, the Board has not 

provided the court with any updates. Accordingly, the Board is now ordered to file information 

with this court by September 24, 2015, updating the court about the status of the Board’s review of 

Starski’s request for reconsideration. The hearing will be continued until October 8, 2015.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 8, 2015

______________________________________

RICHARD SEEBORG

United States District Judge

Case 3:14-cv-00650-RS Document 44 Filed 09/08/15 Page 1 of 1