Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-arwd-5_06-cv-05169/USCOURTS-arwd-5_06-cv-05169-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Benton County Public Defender's Office
Defendant
Barry Hoyt
Plaintiff
Richard Miller
Defendant
Jay Saxton
Defendant

Document Text:

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS

FAYETTEVILLE DIVISION

BARRY HOYT PLAINTIFF

v. Civil No. 06-5169

BENTON COUNTY PUBLIC DEFENDER'S

OFFICE; JAY SAXTON, Public Defender;

and RICHARD MILLER, Public Defender DEFENDANTS

O R D E R

Now on this 14th day of December, 2006, comes on for

consideration the Report And Recommendation Of The Magistrate Judge

(document #5), and plaintiff's response thereto (document #6).

Plaintiff's response is not in the nature of an objection, but rather

a concession that his claim should be dismissed, albeit for a different

reason than that recommended in the Report And Recommendation. 

The Court, having carefully reviewed the Report And

Recommendation, finds that it is sound in all respects, and that it

should be adopted in toto.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Report And Recommendation Of The

Magistrate Judge is adopted in toto.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, for the reasons stated in the Report

And Recommendation Of The Magistrate Judge, plaintiff's complaint is

hereby dismissed.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

 /s/ Jimm Larry Hendren 

JIMM LARRY HENDREN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 5:06-cv-05169-JLH Document 7 Filed 12/14/06 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: <pageID>