Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca8-05-03018/USCOURTS-ca8-05-03018-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Mary Catherine Moran
Appellee
George Poole
Appellant

Document Text:

1

The Honorable Henry E. Autrey, United States District Judge for the Eastern

District of Missouri.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 05-3018

___________

George Poole, *

*

Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* Eastern District of Missouri.

Mary Catherine Moran, *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellee. *

___________

Submitted: December 7, 2005

Filed: December 20, 2005

___________

Before MELLOY, HANSEN, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

George Poole appeals the district court’s1

 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) dismissal,

without prejudice, of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. Having carefully reviewed the

record and Poole’s submissions on appeal, see Moore v. Sims, 200 F.3d 1170, 1171

(8th Cir. 2000) (per curiam) (de novo review), we conclude the judgment of the

district court was correct. Poole failed to allege any violation of his constitutional

rights and, thus, failed to state a cognizable section 1983 claim. See Walker v. Reed,

104 F.3d 156, 157 (8th Cir. 1997) (to state cognizable claim under § 1983, plaintiff’s

Appellate Case: 05-3018 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/20/2005 Entry ID: 1987783
-2-

complaint must allege that conduct of defendant acting under color of state law

deprived him of right, privilege, or immunity secured by Constitution or laws of

United States). We reject Poole’s disqualification argument. Accordingly, we affirm.

See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________

Appellate Case: 05-3018 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/20/2005 Entry ID: 1987783