Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-01739/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-01739-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
John Ray Dynes
Petitioner
Superior Court of Kern County
Respondent

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOHN RAY DYNES, )

)

)

Petitioner, )

)

v. )

)

)

SUPERIOR COURT OF KERN COUNTY, )

)

)

Respondent. )

)

 )

1:07-cv-01739 OWW-TAG (HC) 

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS (Doc. 6)

ORDER DISMISSING PETITION FOR WRIT

OF HABEAS CORPUS (Doc. 1)

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT

TO ENTER JUDGMENT

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254.

On January 18, 2008, the Magistrate Judge assigned to the case filed Findings and

Recommendations recommending the petition for writ of habeas corpus be dismissed because it 

did not state grounds that would entitle Petitioner to relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. (Doc 6). 

The Findings and Recommendations were served on all parties and contained notice that any

objections were to be filed within twenty days from the date of service of that order. To date, the

parties have not filed timely objections to the Findings and Recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted

a de novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court concludes that

the Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations are supported by the record and proper

analysis. 

Case 1:07-cv-01739-OWW -TAG Document 7 Filed 03/14/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed January 18, 2008 (Doc. 6), are 

ADOPTED IN FULL;

2. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 1), is DISMISSED; and

3. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to ENTER JUDGMENT and close the file. 

This order terminates the action in its entirety. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 13, 2008 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger 

emm0d6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:07-cv-01739-OWW -TAG Document 7 Filed 03/14/08 Page 2 of 2