Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-02024/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-02024-2/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
PAA Chudavala
Defendant
City of Los Angeles
Defendant
City of New York
Defendant
Miles Cooley
Defendant
Kotlyard
Defendant
Los Angeles Police Department
Defendant
Chauncey M. Mahan
Plaintiff
Harvey Martin
Defendant
Merrill Michael
Defendant
New York Police Department
Defendant
Juan Perez
Defendant
Shepal
Defendant
Beth Sheppard
Defendant
Jordan W. Siev
Defendant
The Law Firm of Reed Smith
Defendant
Tim Torsney
Defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

No.: 3:16-cv02024-JST - 1 -

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS

LINDA M. ROSS (SBN 133874) 

lross@publiclawgroup.com

STEVEN P. SHAW (SBN 242593) 

sshaw@publiclawgroup.com

RENNE SLOAN HOLTZMAN SAKAI LLP

1220 Seventh Street, Suite 300

Berkeley, California 94710

Telephone: (510) 995-5800

Facsimile: (415) 678-3838

Attorneys for Defendant 

CITY OF NEW YORK, MICHAEL MERRILL

MALTIBEN CHUDAVALA

MICHAEL KOTLYAR

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

CHAUNCEY M. MAHAN,

Plaintiff,

vs.

Juan Perez; Miles Cooley; Jordan W. Siev, and 

The Law Firm of Reed Smith; 

CITY OF LOS ANGELES, a municipal 

corporation; Los Angeles Police Department; 

Officer Shepal, officer; Beth Sheppard, Detective; 

Tim Torsney, Lieutenant; Harvey Martin, 

Detective; Any Other Unknown Officers; in their 

official capacities; CITY OF NEW YORK, a 

municipal corporation; New York Police 

Department; Merrill Michael, Sergeant; PAA 

Chudavala, Officer; Lt. Kotlyard, Lieutenant; Any 

Other Unknown Officers; in their official 

capacities,

Defendants.

Case No.: 3:16-cv02024-JST

STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME 

TO FILE REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION 

TO DISMISS; [PROPOSED] ORDER 

Date: November 3, 2016

Time: 2:00 p.m.

Place Courtroom 9, 19th Floor

450 Golden Gate Ave.

San Francisco, CA

Action Filed: April 18, 2016

Amended Complaint Filed: April 25, 2016

Judge: (Hon.) Jon S. Tigar

STIPULATION

WHEREAS:

1. Defendants City of New York, Michael Merrill, Maltiben Chudavala and Michael 

Kotlyar (“City defendants”) filed a Motion to Dismiss the First Amended Complaint on September 

12, 2016. 

Case 3:16-cv-02024-JST Document 112 Filed 10/24/16 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

No.: 16-cv02024-JST - 2 -

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS 

2. Plaintiff Chauncey Mahan (“Plaintiff”) filed a Motion for Extension of Time to 

Respond to the City defendants’ motion on October 3, 2016.

3. The City defendants did not file an opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion for Extension of 

Time, and on October 5, 2016, the Court granted Plaintiff’s request, providing him with an extension 

until October 17, 2016 to file his opposition to City defendants’ motion. Plaintiff then filed his 

opposition on October 17, 2016.

4. Based on the October 17, 2016 filing date, in accordance with Local Rule 7-3, the 

City defendants’ new deadline for their reply brief is October 24.

5. While the City defendants’ have attempted to complete their reply brief by the 

October 24 deadline, counsel for the City defendants has informed Plaintiff that both the City of 

New York’s Office of Corporation Counsel and outside counsel for defendants had prior 

commitments scheduled during the week preceding this new October 24 deadline and, accordingly,

necessitate a one-week extension of time in order to complete their reply, i.e., until October 31, 

2016.

6. Plaintiff has courteously agreed to the City defendants’ requested extension.

7. The hearing on City defendants’ motion is currently set for November 3, 2016. (The 

parties defer to the Court regarding whether additional time is needed for a disposition on City 

defendants’ motion.)

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS STIPULATED AND AGREED that the City of New York

Michael Merrill, Maltiben Chudavala and Michael Kotlyar’s reply in support of their Motion to 

Dismiss shall be due on October 31, 2016. 

Dated: October 21, 2016 RENNE SLOAN HOLTZMAN SAKAI LLP 

By: /s/ Steven P. Shaw

Steven P. Shaw

Attorneys for Defendants

CITY OF NEW YORK, MICHAEL MERRILL,

MALTIBEN CHUDAVALA AND MICHAEL 

KOTLYAR

Case 3:16-cv-02024-JST Document 112 Filed 10/24/16 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

No.: 16-cv02024-JST - 3 -

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS 

Dated: October 21, 2016 CHAUNCEY MAHAN

By:

Chauncey Mahan

Pro Se Plaintiff

[PROPOSED] ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION AND FOR GOOD CAUSE SHOWN, IT IS SO 

ORDERED. 

Dated: October ___, 2016 

By:

The Honorable Jon S. Tigar 

United States District Judge 

/s/ Chauncey M. Mahan

24

Case 3:16-cv-02024-JST Document 112 Filed 10/24/16 Page 3 of 3