Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-02126/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-02126-3/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Budget Property Management, Inc.
Defendant
Cal Investors, Inc.
Defendant
California Investor
Defendant
California Investors
Defendant
Michele Giguiere
Defendant
William T. Martin
Defendant
Wesley Riley
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 1 - 

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER 

William A. Muñoz - 191649 

Robert W. Lucas - 143920 

MURPHY, PEARSON, BRADLEY & FEENEY 

701 University Avenue, Suite 150 

Sacramento, CA 95825 

Telephone: (916) 565-0300 

Facsimile: (916) 565-1636 

Attorneys for Defendants 

WILLIAM T. MARTIN, CALIFORNIA INVESTOR, CALIFORNIA INVESTORS and 

BUDGET PROPERTY MANAGEMENT INC. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SACRAMENTO 

 

WESLEY RILEY, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

MICHELE GIGUIERE, BUDGET PROPERTY 

MANAGEMENT, INC., CAL INVESTORS, INC., 

WILLIAM T. MARTIN, CALIFORNIA 

INVESTOR and CALIFORNIA INVESTORS, 

Defendants. 

Case No.: CV 021266-LKK-KJM 

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR AN 

EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANTS 

WILLIAM T. MARTIN, CALIFORNIA 

INVESTOR, CALIFORNIA INVESTORS, 

AND BUDGET PROPERTY 

MANAGEMENT, INC., TO RESPOND TO 

FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT 

The parties, by and through their respective counsel, do hereby agree and stipulate as follows: 

WHEREAS, Defendants William T. Martin, California Investor, California Investors, and 

Budget Property Management, Inc., were ostensibly served with the First Amended Complaint on or 

about March 2, 2007, and have not formally appeared in the present action; 

WHEREAS, Defendants William T. Martin, California Investor, California Investors, and 

Budget Property Management, Inc., assuming service is proper, are to respond to the First Amended 

Complaint on or before March 22, 2007; 

WHEREAS, Defendants William T. Martin, California Investor, California Investors, and 

Budget Property Management, Inc., contend that they are not debt collectors for purposes of the Fair 

Debt Collection Practices Act. Defendants’ counsel has communicated this to Plaintiff’s counsel and 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 2:06-cv-02126-LKK -KJM Document 30 Filed 03/28/07 Page 1 of 5
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 - 

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER 

provided case authority holding the same for Plaintiff’s counsel to review. 

WHEREAS, Plaintiff’s counsel recently started his own firm and has not had the opportunity to 

review the case authority provided by Defendants’ counsel, an extension of time of one week for 

Defendants to respond to the First Amended Complaint is appropriate in order to potentially minimize 

the attorney’s fees and costs that would otherwise be incurred in preparing a responsive pleading. 

The parties hereby STIPULATE and AGREE: 

Defendants William T. Martin, California Investor, California Investors, and Budget Property 

Management Inc.’s responsive pleading to the First Amended Complaint is due on or before March 29, 

2007. 

Dated: March 28, 2007 

MURPHY, PEARSON, BRADLEY & FEENEY 

By /s/ 

William A. Munoz 

Attorneys for Defendants 

WILLIAM T. MARTIN, CALIFORNIA 

INVESTORS, INC., CALIFORNIA INVESTORS 

and BUDGET PROPERTY MANAGEMENT INC. 

Dated: March 28, 2007 

MURPHY, CAMPBELL, GUTHRIE & ALLISTON 

By /s/ 

Mark A. Campbell 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

WESLEY RILEY 

 

Dated: March 28, 2007 

 

By /s/ 

Michele L. Giguiere 

Pro Se Defendant 

WAM.10364352.doc 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 2:06-cv-02126-LKK -KJM Document 30 Filed 03/28/07 Page 2 of 5
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 3 - 

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER 

ORDER

Having considered the Stipulation of the parties and for good cause appearing, Defendants 

William T. Martin, California Investor, California Investors, and Budget Management property, Inc.’s 

responsive pleading shall be due on or before March 29, 2007. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: March 28, 2007. 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 2:06-cv-02126-LKK -KJM Document 30 Filed 03/28/07 Page 3 of 5
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 4 - 

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER 

DATED: CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I, Donna M. Rosse, declare: 

I am a citizen of the United States, am over the age of eighteen years, and am not a party to or 

interested in the within entitled cause. My business address is 701 University Avenue, Suite 150, 

Sacramento, CA 95825. 

On March 28, 2007, I served the following document(s) on the parties in the within action: 

BY MAIL: I am familiar with the business practice for collection and processing of mail. 

The above-described document(s) will be enclosed in a sealed envelope, with first class 

postage thereon fully prepaid, and deposited with the United States Postal Service at 

Sacramento, CA on this date, addressed as follows: 

BY HAND: The above-described document(s) will be placed in a sealed envelope which 

will be hand-delivered on this same date by _________________________, addressed as 

follows: 

XX VIA FACSIMILE: The above-described document(s) will be transmitted via facsimile, 

and a copy of same will be mailed, on this same date to the following: 

VIA OVERNIGHT SERVICE: The above-described document(s) will be delivered by 

overnight service, to the following: 

Mark A. Campbell 

Murphy, Campbell, Guthrie & Alliston 

3640 American River Drive, #150 

Sacramento, CA 95864 

(916) 484-3510 (facsimile) 

Attorney For Plaintiff 

WESLEY RILEY 

Michele L. Giguiere 

4811 Chippendale Drive, #702 

Sacramento, CA 95841 

Pro Se Defendant 

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America and the State 

of California that the foregoing is a true and correct statement and that this Certificate was executed on 

March 28, 2007. 

By 

Donna M. Rosse 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 2:06-cv-02126-LKK -KJM Document 30 Filed 03/28/07 Page 4 of 5
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 5 - 

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 2:06-cv-02126-LKK -KJM Document 30 Filed 03/28/07 Page 5 of 5