Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_13-cv-02506/USCOURTS-caed-2_13-cv-02506-6/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Horowitz
Defendant
Richard Peacock
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

RICHARD PEACOCK, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

HOROWITZ, 

Defendants. 

No. 2:13-cv-2506 TLN AC P 

ORDER 

 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 

42 U.S.C. § 1983. Currently before the court is defendant’s motion to compel and to modify the 

scheduling order. ECF No. 31. 

 Defendant’s motion seeks to compel plaintiff to complete his deposition and to modify the 

scheduling order to allow the completion of plaintiff’s deposition after the close of discovery and 

to extend the time for filing dispositive motions. Id. The court will withhold ruling on the 

motion to compel until the motion is fully briefed. However, in light of the pending motion to 

compel, the motion to modify the scheduling will be granted. 

 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 

 1. Plaintiff shall respond to defendant’s motion to compel (ECF No. 31) within twentyone days of this order. Defendant shall have seven days to reply. 

/// 

Case 2:13-cv-02506-TLN-AC Document 33 Filed 08/05/15 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2

 2. Defendant’s motion to modify the scheduling order (ECF No. 31) is granted. The 

October 30, 2015 dispositive motion deadline is vacated and new deadlines for the completion of 

plaintiff’s deposition and the filing of dispositive motions will be set upon resolution of the 

motion to compel. 

DATED: August 4, 2015 

Case 2:13-cv-02506-TLN-AC Document 33 Filed 08/05/15 Page 2 of 2