Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_16-cv-01205/USCOURTS-caed-1_16-cv-01205-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
El Nopal Bakery
Defendant
Oscar Flores
Plaintiff
Elena Rodriguez
Defendant
Rogelio Torres
Defendant

Document Text:

STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR RESPONSIVE PLEADING AND CONTINUANCE OF 

MANDATORY SCHEDULING CONFERENCE; 

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

Page 1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Tanya E. Moore, SBN 206683 

Zachary M. Best, SBN 166035 

MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C. 

332 North Second Street 

San Jose, California 95112 

Telephone (408) 298-2000 

Facsimile (408) 298-6046 

Email: service@moorelawfirm.com 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

Oscar Flores 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

OSCAR FLORES, 

 Plaintiff, 

 vs. 

EL NOPAL BAKERY, et al., 

 Defendants. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

)

No. 1:16-cv-01205-LJO-BAM 

STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF 

TIME FOR DEFENDANTS’ 

RESPONSIVE PLEADINGS AND FOR 

CONTINUANCE OF MANDATORY 

SCHEDULING CONFERENCE; 

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

 

 

 WHEREAS, a Mandatory Scheduling Conference in this action is currently set for 

November 22, 2016, pursuant to the Court’s Minute Order dated August 15, 2016 (Dkt. 3); 

 WHEREAS, Plaintiff, Oscar Flores (“Plaintiff”), and Defendants, El Nopal Bakery; 

Rogelio Torres, Trustee of the Modesto S. Torres and Margarita G. Torres Revocable Living 

Trust Agreement dated March 1, 1993; and Elena Rodriguez, Trustee of the Modesto S. Torres 

and Margarita G. Torres Revocable Living Trust Agreement dated March 1, 1993 

(“Defendants,” and together with Plaintiff, “the Parties”), are engaging in settlement 

discussions and wish to exhaust such efforts before incurring the fees and costs associated with 

the responsive pleadings and the Scheduling Conference, and to conserve Court resources, and 

are very optimistic that a settlement will be reached informally; 

Case 1:16-cv-01205-LJO-BAM Document 10 Filed 11/04/16 Page 1 of 3
STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR RESPONSIVE PLEADING AND CONTINUANCE OF 

MANDATORY SCHEDULING CONFERENCE; 

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

Page 2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties, by and through their respective counsel, stipulate to a 

continuance of the Mandatory Scheduling Conference currently set for November 22, 2016 to a 

date at the Court’s convenience after January 2, 2017, and to an extension of time for 

Defendants’ responsive pleadings such that they be due on December 9, 2016. This extension 

exceeds 28 days. 

Dated: November 2, 2016 MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C. 

 By: /s/ Tanya E. Moore 

 Tanya E. Moore 

 Attorneys for Plaintiff, 

 Jose Trujillo 

Dated: November 2, 2016 COLEMAN & HOROWITT, LLP 

 By:___/s/ Keith M. White______________ 

 Keith M. White 

 Attorneys for Defendants, 

 El Nopal Bakery; Rogelio Torres, Trustee of the 

 Modesto S. Torres and Margarita G. Torres 

 Revocable Living Trust Agreement dated March 1, 

 1993; and Elena Rodriguez, Trustee of the 

 Modesto S. Torres and Margarita G. Torres 

 Revocable Living Trust Agreement dated March 1, 

 1993 

Case 1:16-cv-01205-LJO-BAM Document 10 Filed 11/04/16 Page 2 of 3
STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR RESPONSIVE PLEADING AND CONTINUANCE OF 

MANDATORY SCHEDULING CONFERENCE; 

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

Page 3

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER 

The parties having so stipulated and good cause appearing, 

 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Mandatory Scheduling Conference currently set for 

November 22, 2016 is continued to January 26, 2017 at 8:30 AM, in courtroom 8 (BAM) 

before Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe. The parties are to file their Joint Scheduling 

Report no later than seven days prior to the conference. 

 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants shall file their responsive pleadings on or 

before December 9, 2016. 

 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: November 3, 2016 /s/ Barbara A. McAuliffe 

 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

Case 1:16-cv-01205-LJO-BAM Document 10 Filed 11/04/16 Page 3 of 3