Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-01395/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-01395-2/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Director of the California Department of Corrections
Defendant
Thomas K. Mills
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

THOMAS K. MILLS,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-06-1395 GEB DAD P

vs.

DIRECTOR OF THE CALIFORNIA

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS

JOHN DOE, 

Defendant. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

A recent court order was served on plaintiff's address of record and returned by

the postal service. It appears that plaintiff has failed to comply with Local Rule 83-182(f), which

requires that a party appearing in propria persona inform the court of any address change.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed

due to plaintiff's failure to keep the court apprised of his current address. See Local Rules 83-

182(f) and 11-110.

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty

days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written

objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s

Case 2:06-cv-01395-GEB-DAD Document 19 Filed 04/09/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the

specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951

F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

 DATED: April 9, 2008.

DAD:dd

mill1395.33a

Case 2:06-cv-01395-GEB-DAD Document 19 Filed 04/09/08 Page 2 of 2