Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-01184/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-01184-5/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
City Of Fresno
Defendant
Greg Occhionero
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GREG OCCHIONERO, )

)

Plaintiff, )

v. )

)

CITY OF FRESNO, )

)

Defendant. )

)

 )

1:05-cv-1184-AWI-SMS

ORDER VACATING COURT’S ORDER OF

NOVEMBER 6, 2006, DUE TO CLERICAL

ERROR (DOC. 38)

ORDER DETERMINING THAT

PLAINTIFF’S COUNSEL’S MOTION TO

WITHDRAW MAY BE HEARD ON THE

PAPERS AND DEEMING THE MOTION

SUBMITTED FOR DECISION (DOCS. 33,

36) 

Plaintiff is proceeding with a civil action in this Court.

The matter has been referred to the Magistrate Judge pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Local Rules 72-302(c)(1) and 72-303.

I. Vacating Court’s Order of November 6, 2006

Due to clerical error, on November 6, 2006, the Court

vacated the hearing on the motion of Plaintiff’s counsel, Charles

L. Doerksen, to withdraw as counsel of record for Plaintiff. 

Accordingly, the Court’s order of November 6, 2006, IS

VACATED.

II. Deeming Motion Submitted on the Pleadings

Case 1:05-cv-01184-LJO -SMS Document 39 Filed 11/06/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

The Court notes that the motion of Plaintiff’s counsel,

Charles L. Doerksen, to withdraw as counsel of record for

Plaintiff, was filed on October 6, 2006, and was ultimately set

for hearing on November 17, 2006. The Court had not received any

opposition to the motion by November 6, 2006. Thus, pursuant to

Local Rule 78-230(c), the time for filing of any opposition to

the motion had passed. Further, considering the nature of the

motion, the Court concludes that matter that may appropriately be

submitted upon the record and briefs.

Accordingly, the hearing on the motion will not be reset,

and the motion IS DEEMED SUBMITTED to the Court for decision.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: November 6, 2006 /s/ Sandra M. Snyder 

icido3 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:05-cv-01184-LJO -SMS Document 39 Filed 11/06/06 Page 2 of 2