Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-00495/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-00495-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Pam Ahlin
Defendant
Anthony Cassells
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ANTHONY CASSELLS,

Plaintiff,

v.

PAM AHLIN,

Defendant.

No. 2:15-cv-0495 KJN P

ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

Plaintiff is a civil committee, proceeding pro se. By an order filed March 17, 2015, 

plaintiff was ordered to file a completed in forma pauperis affidavit on the form used by this 

district, and a certified prison trust account statement within thirty days and was cautioned that 

failure to do so would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. The thirty day 

period has now expired, and plaintiff has not responded to the court’s order and has not filed the 

required documents.

In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is 

directed to assign a district judge to this case; and

IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice.

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 

after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written 

Case 2:15-cv-00495-MCE-KJN Document 5 Filed 04/28/15 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned 

“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Any response to the 

objections shall be filed and served within fourteen days after service of the objections. The 

parties are advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to 

appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

Dated: April 28, 2015

/cass0495.fifp

Case 2:15-cv-00495-MCE-KJN Document 5 Filed 04/28/15 Page 2 of 2