Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-01574/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-01574-16/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Naim I. Ayat
Plaintiff
Goodrich Corporation
Defendant
Societe Air France
Defendant

Document Text:

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

NAIM I. AYAT,

Plaintiff,

 v.

SOCIETE AIR FRANCE, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

No. C 06-01574 JSW

ORDER GRANTING IN PART

AND DENYING PART

PLAINTIFF’S ADMINISTRATIVE

MOTION TO REVISE THE

COURT’S SCHEDULING ORDER

On January 1, 2008, Plaintiff filed an administrative motion to revise this Court’s

scheduling order and to request a ruling regarding the pending discovery dispute. Because

Magistrate Judge Larson has now issued a ruling on the pending discovery dispute, the Court

denies Plaintiff’s motion as to this issue as MOOT. Judge Larson granted Defendant Societe

Air France’s (“Air France”) motion for protective order and held that Plaintiff is precluded from

taking discovery into the issue of liability against Air France. Therefore, the Court finds that

Plaintiff has not shown good cause for extending the deadline to take discovery against Air

France, and thus DENIES Plaintiff’s motion on this issue. With respect to discovery against

Defendant Goodrich Corporation (“Goodrich”), although Plaintiff should have moved to extend

the deadlines before they expired, the Court finds that Plaintiff has made a showing of good

cause to warrant a brief extension of the discovery deadlines. The Court admonishes Plaintiff

that the Court will not extend the deadlines any further. 

Case 3:06-cv-01574-JSW Document 111 Filed 01/09/08 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

The Court HEREBY GRANTS Plaintiff’s motion in part and ORDERS that the

deadlines in this matter are CONTINUED as follows:

(1) close of fact discovery with respect to Goodrich is continued to April 4, 2008;

(2) close of expert discovery with respect to Goodrich is continued to June 13, 2008;

(3) the last day to have dispositive motions heard with respect to all parties is

continued to August 15, 2008 at 9:00 a.m.;

(4) the pretrial conference for all parties is continued to November 3, 2008 at 2:00

p.m.; and

(5) the trial for all parties is continued to December 1, 2008 at 8:30 a.m.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 9, 2008 

JEFFREY S. WHITE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:06-cv-01574-JSW Document 111 Filed 01/09/08 Page 2 of 2