Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_16-cv-00990/USCOURTS-caed-2_16-cv-00990-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
California Service Company
Defendant
Sherri Gebhart
Defendant
Susie Hudson
Defendant
KaShonda Lawson
Plaintiff
Paul Vitelli
Defendant

Document Text:

STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO FILE AND SERVE RESPONSIVE PLEADING

DWT 30225145v1 0103970-000001

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

JEFFREY S. BOSLEY (CA State Bar No. 167629)

jeffbosley@dwt.com

JULIA BRODSKY (CA State Bar No. 266177)

juliabrodsky@dwt.com

DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP

505 Montgomery Street, Suite 800

San Francisco, California 94111

Telephone: (415) 276-6500

Facsimile: (415) 276-6599

Attorneys for Defendant

CORPORATION SERVICE COMPANY (erroneously 

sued as “California Service Company”)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KASHONDA LAWSON,

Plaintiff,

vs.

CALIFORNIA SERVICE COMPANY, PAUL 

VITELLI, SHERRI GEBHART, SUSIE 

HUDSON, and DOES 1 THROUGH 50,

Defendants.

Case No. 2:16-CV-00990-MCE-EFB

STIPULATION AND ORDER 

EXTENDING TIME TO FILE AND 

SERVE RESPONSIVE PLEADING

Assigned to the Hon. Morrison C. England, 

Jr.

Action Filed: May 10, 2016

Case 2:16-cv-00990-MCE-EFB Document 9 Filed 09/19/16 Page 1 of 3
1

STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO FILE AND SERVE RESPONSIVE PLEADING

DWT 30225145v1 0103970-000001

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

RECITALS

WHEREAS, on or about May 10, 2016, Plaintiff KASHONDA LAWSON (“Plaintiff”) 

filed a Complaint against Defendant CORPORATION SERVICE COMPANY (erroneously sued as 

“California Service Company”) (“Defendant”) in the above-referenced matter;

WHEREAS, Defendant was served with the Complaint on or about August 8, 2016;

WHEREAS, on August 23, 2016, prior to Defendant’s deadline to file a responsive 

pleading, Plaintiff granted Defendant a 14-day extension to file and serve Defendant’s responsive 

pleading, until September 12, 2016;

WHEREAS, Plaintiff and Defendant agree that they will not be prejudiced by an additional 

extension of time for Defendant to file its responsive pleading;

WHEREAS, the Court has not previously granted any extensions of time to respond in this 

matter; and 

WHEREAS, the parties agree that the time for Defendant to respond to the Complaint 

should be extended through and including September 26, 2016.

///

///

///

///

///

///

///

///

///

///

///

///

///

///

Case 2:16-cv-00990-MCE-EFB Document 9 Filed 09/19/16 Page 2 of 3
2

STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO FILE AND SERVE RESPONSIVE PLEADING

DWT 30225145v1 0103970-000001

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS STIPULATED AND AGREED by Plaintiff and Defendant, 

through their respective counsel of record, as follows:

The time for Defendant to respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint shall be extended through and 

including September 26, 2016. 

DATED: September 17, 2016 DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP

JEFFREY S. BOSLEY

JULIA BRODSKY

By: /s/ Jeffrey S. Bosley

Jeffrey S. Bosley

Attorneys for Defendant

CORPORATION SERVICE COMPANY 

(erroneously sued as “California Service Company”)

DATED: September 17, 2016 ARNOLD LAW FIRM

JOSHUA H. WATSON

By: /s/ Joshua H. Watson

Joshua H. Watson

Attorney for Plaintiff 

KASHONDA LAWSON

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 17, 2016

Case 2:16-cv-00990-MCE-EFB Document 9 Filed 09/19/16 Page 3 of 3