Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_16-cv-00497/USCOURTS-caed-1_16-cv-00497-7/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Commissioner of Social Security
Defendant
Sylvia Estrada
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SYLVIA ESTRADA,

Plaintiff,

v.

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL 

SECURITY,

Defendant.

Case No. 1:16-cv-00497-AWI-SAB

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND 

RECOMMENDATIONS AND DISMISSING 

ACTION

(ECF No. 11)

Plaintiff Sylvia Estrada (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se, filed a complaint seeking judicial 

review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner” or 

“Defendant”) denying her application for disability benefits pursuant to the Social Security Act

on April 8, 2016. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 

U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 

On June 29, 2016, the Magistrate Judge filed a findings and recommendations. The 

findings and recommendations recommended that this action be dismissed without prejudice for 

Plaintiff’s failure to comply with orders of the court and failure to prosecute. The findings and 

recommendations was served on Plaintiff and contained notice that any objections were to be 

filed within thirty days from the date of service. On August 5, 2016, an order issued adopting 

the findings and recommendations and this action was dismissed. On August 25, 2016, Plaintiff 

Case 1:16-cv-00497-AWI-SAB Document 17 Filed 09/15/16 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

filed a motion for reconsideration. On August 29, 2016, an order issued vacating the prior order 

and reopening this action. Plaintiff was ordered to file objections to the findings and 

recommendations by September 12, 2016. Further, the order provided that the Clerk of the Court 

must be in receipt of the objections by September 12, 2016. The time to file objections has 

passed and Plaintiff has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations. 

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted 

a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the 

Findings and Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed June 29, 2016, is ADOPTED IN 

FULL; 

2. This action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for Plaintiff’s failure to 

comply with court orders and failure to prosecute; and

3. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to close this action.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 15, 2016 

 SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:16-cv-00497-AWI-SAB Document 17 Filed 09/15/16 Page 2 of 2