Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-19-02333/USCOURTS-ca4-19-02333-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Autumn Virginia Karas
Appellant
Southern Kia-Greenbrier
Appellee

Document Text:

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-2333

AUTUMN VIRGINIA KARAS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

SOUTHERN KIA-GREENBRIER,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at 

Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (2:19-cv-00489-RAJ-RJK)

Submitted: March 10, 2020 Decided: March 12, 2020

Before NIEMEYER and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Autumn Virginia Karas, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 19-2333 Doc: 9 Filed: 03/12/2020 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Autumn Virginia Karas appeals the district court’s order dismissing her complaint 

without prejudice for failure to comply with the court’s order directing her to pay the filing 

fee. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the informal brief. See 4th 

Cir. R. 34(b). Because Karas’ informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district 

court’s disposition, she has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. See Jackson v. 

Lightsey, 775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th Cir. 2014) (“The informal brief is an important document; 

under Fourth Circuit rules, our review is limited to issues preserved in that brief.”). 

Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

USCA4 Appeal: 19-2333 Doc: 9 Filed: 03/12/2020 Pg: 2 of 2