Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-05516/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-05516-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Jimmie Stringer
Plaintiff
Vaneida White
Defendant

Document Text:

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JIMMIE STRINGER,

Plaintiff,

 v.

VANEIDA WHITE,

Defendant. /

No. C 07-05516 SI

ORDER RE: ORAL ARGUMENT

The motion by the United States to substitute the government as the defendant and to dismiss

plaintiff’s complaint for failure to exhaust his administrative remedies is currently scheduled for hearing

on Friday, January 25, 2008. It has come to the Court’s attention that in addition to plaintiff’s tort

claims, he also alleges a violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”). The Court asks the

United States to be prepared to discuss at oral argument the question whether plaintiff’s ADA claim or

claims are embraced by the motion to dismiss and whether the United States is the proper defendant as

to these potential claims.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 23, 2008 

SUSAN ILLSTON

United States District Judge

Case 3:07-cv-05516-SI Document 17 Filed 01/23/08 Page 1 of 1