Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-09-07892/USCOURTS-ca4-09-07892-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
United States of America
Appellee
Rodney Wilson
Appellant

Document Text:

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 09-7892

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff - Appellee, 

 v. 

RODNEY WILSON, 

 Defendant - Appellant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of Virginia, at Danville. Norman K. Moon, District 

Judge. (4:03-cr-70134-nkm-mfu-3) 

Submitted: January 19, 2010 Decided: January 28, 2010 

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges. 

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Rodney Wilson, Appellant Pro Se. Donald Ray Wolthuis, Assistant 

United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 

Appeal: 09-7892 Doc: 13 Filed: 01/28/2010 Pg: 1 of 2
2 

PER CURIAM: 

Rodney Wilson appeals the district court’s order 

denying his motion for a reduction of sentence filed pursuant to 

18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and 

find the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying 

the motion. See United States v. Goines, 357 F.3d 469, 478 (4th 

Cir. 2004) (motion under § 3582(c) “is subject to the discretion 

of the district court”); United States v. Legree, 205 F.3d 724, 

727 (4th Cir. 2000). Thus, we affirm the district court’s order 

for the reasons stated there. See United States v. Wilson, No. 

4:03-cr-70134-nkm-mfu-3 (W.D. Va. Sept. 24, 2009). We dispense 

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before the court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process. 

AFFIRMED

Appeal: 09-7892 Doc: 13 Filed: 01/28/2010 Pg: 2 of 2