Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_15-cv-00822/USCOURTS-caed-1_15-cv-00822-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Cynthia Hopson
Plaintiff
Shafiq Khalil Muhareb
Defendant
Ramico Incorporated
Defendant
Waffle House
Defendant

Document Text:

Request for Continuance to File Dismissal Documents, and Order Granting Thereof

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DANIEL MALAKAUSKAS, SBN 265903

P.O. Box 7006

Stockton, CA 95267

Telephone: (866) 790-2242

Facsimile: (888) 802-2440

Attorney for Plaintiff,

CYNTHIA HOPSON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, 

FRESNO DIVISION

CYNTHIA HOPSON,

PLAINTIFF,

v.

RAMICO INCORPORATED, as an entity 

and dba Waffle House, SHAFIQ KHALIL 

MUHAREB, as an entity and dba Waffle 

House, and DOES 1-10, inclusive,

 DEFENDANTS.

CASE NO.: 1:15-cv-00822-AWI-GSA

MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE OF 

DATE TO FILE DISMISSAL 

DOCUMENTS AND ORDER 

GRANTING THEREOF

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE, that Plaintiff, CYNTHIA HOSPON, through his attorney, 

Daniel Malakauskas, Esq. requests that the date to file the dismissal document be continued for 

ninety-five (95) days.

I, DANIEL MALAKAUSKAS, declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the 

State of California that the following is true and correct:

1. I am an attorney representing the plaintiff, Cynthia Hopson, in this lawsuit. I am 

competent to testify and am personally familiar with the facts of this case. I became personally 

familiar with the facts of this case either through my own personal knowledge, information my 

Case 1:15-cv-00822-DAD-EPG Document 17 Filed 06/30/16 Page 1 of 3
Request for Continuance to File Dismissal Documents, and Order Granting Thereof

2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

client and, or, private investigator, and, or, process server, and, or, records researcher gave me, or 

be reviewing the Court’s case file. If called to testify, I would testify as follows:

2. On May 10th, 2016, the Plaintiff and Defendants agreed to the terms of the 

settlement. Plaintiff, through her attorney filed a notice of settlement. The parties initially 

believed it would take Defendants thirty days to perform under the agreement.

3. On May 24th, 2016, Plaintiff sent a signed settlement agreement to Defendants.

4. On May 31st, 2016, Defendants returned a signed settlement agreement.

5. However, Defendants through their attorney subsequently asked to modify the 

terms of the agreement in order to perform within roughly one-hundred and fifty days (150).

6. Plaintiff agreed to modify the terms.

7. Defendants have been performing under the terms of the agreement.

8. Plaintiff desires to have Defendants complete performance before the dismissal 

documents are filed.

9. For these reasons, Plaintiff asks for the Court’s patience and requests an 

additional ninety-five (95) day continuance.

Dated: June 28th, 2016 Respectfully submitted,

/s/Daniel Malakauskas_________________

By: Daniel Malakauskas,

Attorney for Plaintiff

Case 1:15-cv-00822-DAD-EPG Document 17 Filed 06/30/16 Page 2 of 3
Request for Continuance to File Dismissal Documents, and Order Granting Thereof

3

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, that the dismissal document due date is continued from 

June 28th, 2016, until September 30, 2016.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 29, 2016 /s/

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:15-cv-00822-DAD-EPG Document 17 Filed 06/30/16 Page 3 of 3