Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-23-07010/USCOURTS-ca4-23-07010-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Beaty
Appellee
Booker
Appellee
Lieutenant Brown
Appellee
Bryant
Appellee
Jeremy Paul Defour
Appellant
Edmonds
Appellee
Moore
Appellee
Randolph
Appellee
Ross
Appellee
Rosson
Appellee
Stanton
Appellee
Walker
Appellee
Webber
Appellee

Document Text:

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 23-7010

JEREMY PAUL DEFOUR,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

LIEUTENANT WEBBER; OFFICER BEATY, a/k/a Officer Bates; 

INTELLIGENCE OFFICER ROSSON; LIEUTENANT BROWN; WARDEN 

EDMONDS; CHIEF OF HOUSING WALKER; ASSISTANT WARDEN 

MOORE; OPERATIONS MANAGER BRYANT; HEARING OFFICER 

STANTON, f/k/a Hearing Officer Forbes; MAJOR ROSS; UNIT MANAGER 

BOOKER; SGT. RANDOLPH,

 Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at 

Roanoke. James P. Jones, Senior District Judge. (7:22-cv-00379-JPJ-PMS)

Submitted: October 31, 2024 Decided: January 17, 2025

Before KING, GREGORY, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jeremy Paul Defour, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 23-7010 Doc: 17 Filed: 01/17/2025 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Jeremy Paul Defour appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment 

in favor of Defendants in this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action and denying Defour’s motions for 

sanctions. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we 

affirm the district court’s order. Defour v. Webber, No. 7:22-cv-00379-JPJ-PMS (W.D. 

Va. Sept. 20, 2023). We deny Defour’s motion to assign counsel and dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

USCA4 Appeal: 23-7010 Doc: 17 Filed: 01/17/2025 Pg: 2 of 2