Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_15-mc-80005/USCOURTS-cand-4_15-mc-80005-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Cisco Systems, Inc.
Movant
Comcast Cable Communications, LLC
Defendant
Sprint Communications Co., LP
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR CISCO’S REPLY TO SPRINT’S 

RESPONSE TO MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER 

Case No. 4:15-mc-80005-KAW 1 

Shane Brun (SBN 179079) 

sbrun@goodwinprocter.com

GOODWIN PROCTER LLP

Three Embarcadero Center, 24th Floor 

San Francisco, California 94111-4003 

Tel.: 415.733.6000 

Fax.: 415.677.9041 

Attorney for Non-Party 

CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS CO., LP 

Plaintiff, 

v.

COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS, 

LLC, et al., 

Defendants.

Case No. 4:15-mc-80005-KAW 

Actions pending in the United States District 

Court for the District of Kansas (2:11-cv-02684, 

2:11-cv-2685, 2:11-cv-2586) 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR 

CISCO’S REPLY TO SPRINT’S 

RESPONSE TO MOTION FOR 

PROTECTIVE ORDER 

Judge: Hon. Kandis Westmore 

Case 4:15-mc-80005-KAW Document 14 Filed 02/17/15 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR CISCO’S REPLY TO SPRINT’S 

RESPONSE TO MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER 

Case No. 4:15-mc-80005-KAW 2 

Pursuant to Local Rule 7-12, Applicant Cisco Systems, Inc. (“Cisco”) and Plaintiff Sprint 

Communications Co., Inc. (“Cisco”), by and through their counsel of record, stipulate that the 

deadline for Cisco’s Reply to Sprint’s Response to Cisco’s Motion for Protective Order be moved 

from February 17, 2015 to March 3, 2015 for the reasons set forth in the attached declaration. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

Dated: February 17, 2015. Respectfully submitted, 

GOODWIN PROCTER LLP 

By: /s/ Shane Brun .

Shane Brun (SBN 179079) 

Attorney for Applicant 

CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. 

SHOOK, HARDY & BACON, LLP 

By: /s/ Rachel M. Smith .

Rachel M. Smith (SBN 257866)) 

Attorney for Plaintiff 

SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS CO., LP 

Pursuant to General Order No. 45.X.B., the filer attests that concurrence in the filing of 

this document has been obtained from the above Signatory. 

Dated: February 17, 2015. 

By: /s/ Shane Brun .

Shane Brun (SBN 179079) 

Case 4:15-mc-80005-KAW Document 14 Filed 02/17/15 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR CISCO’S REPLY TO SPRINT’S 

RESPONSE TO MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER 

Case No. 4:15-mc-80005-KAW 3 

PURSUANT TO THE STIPULATION, IT IS ORDERED THAT the deadline for Cisco’s 

Reply to Sprint’s Response to Cisco’s Motion for Protective Order is set for March 3, 2015. 

 IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: February ____, 2015. 

.

HON. KANDIS A. WESTMORE 

United States District Judge 

17

Case 4:15-mc-80005-KAW Document 14 Filed 02/17/15 Page 3 of 3