Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_11-cv-01852/USCOURTS-caed-1_11-cv-01852-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
City of Modesto
Defendant
Modesto Police Department
Defendant
Roberto Vargas
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

JAMES F. WILSON, Senior Deputy City Attorney, SB #107289

SUSANA ALCALA WOOD, City Attorney, SB#156366

City of Modesto

1010 10th Street, Suite 6300

P.O. Box 642

Modesto, California 95353

Telephone: (209) 577-5284

Facsimile: (209) 544-8260

Attorneys for Defendants

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - FRESNO

ROBERTO VARGAS,

Plaintiff,

vs.

CITY OF MODESTO, MODESTO

POLICE DEPARTMENT, Does 1 to 100,

Inclusive, 

Defendants.

 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. 1:11-CV-01852-AWI-SKO

STIPULATION AND ORDER RE:

DISMISSAL OF THE ACTION

STIPULATION

The parties to the above-entitled action hereby stipulate and agree as follows:

1. With the court’s approval, the parties, by and through their respective counsel of

record, hereby stipulate that and agree, in exchange for the waiver of the defendants’ right to recover the

costs of defense incurred thus far this action before the U.S. District Court, and in order to allow for the

return of this action to the Superior Court of Stanislaus County for litigation to its conclusion, the

plaintiff agrees to the dismissal of any and all claims in this action brought under Title 42 U.S.C. section

1983 with prejudice, and the dismissal of all state tort claims in this action without prejudice to their

further adjudication before the Superior Court of Stanislaus County California.

2. Each side is to bear its own costs in the litigation of the action before the U.S. District

Court, including attorney’s fees.

-1- 

Case 1:11-cv-01852-AWI-SKO Document 12 Filed 01/04/13 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3. IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Date: January 3, 2013 Respectfully submitted,

SUSANA ALCALA WOOD

City Attorney

By: /s/ 

 JAMES F. WILSON

 Senior Deputy City Attorney

 Attorneys for Defendants

Date: January 3, 2013 Respectfully submitted,

By: /s/ 

 STEVEN A. FABBRO

 Attorney for Plaintiff

ORDER

Based upon the foregoing stipulation and agreement of the parties in the above-entitled action,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is dismissed as follows:

1. All claims advanced by the plaintiff in this action under Title 42 U.S.C. section 1983

are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE;

2. All claims advanced by plaintiff in this action under state tort and/or state

constitutional theories of recovery are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to their further

adjudication before the Superior Court of the State of California in Stanislaus County, California.

3. Each side is to bear its own costs, including attorney’s fees, in this action.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: January 4, 2013 

ciem0h UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

-2- 

Case 1:11-cv-01852-AWI-SKO Document 12 Filed 01/04/13 Page 2 of 2