Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_20-cv-02025/USCOURTS-cand-3_20-cv-02025-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Ethaniel J. Brooks
Plaintiff
City Of Oakland
Defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ETHANIEL J. BROOKS,

Plaintiff,

v.

CITY OF OAKLAND,

Defendant.

Case No. 20-cv-02025-JD 

ORDER 

Re: Dkt. No. 4

The Court has reviewed Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu’s report and recommendation. 

Dkt. No. 4. No objections have been filed in response to the report, and the time to file objections 

has expired. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b).

The Court agrees with Magistrate Judge Ryu’s well-reasoned report and recommendation. 

The Court consequently adopts it in full and remands the case to Alameda County Superior Court. 

Plaintiff’s requests to proceed in forma pauperis, Dkt. Nos. 2, 6, are denied as moot. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 30, 2020

JAMES DONATO

United States District Judge

Case 3:20-cv-02025-JD Document 12 Filed 04/30/20 Page 1 of 1