Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-14-01893/USCOURTS-ca4-14-01893-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Allied-Barton, LLC
Appellee
Kate Hetherington
Appellee
Howard Community College
Appellee
Mel Marin
Appellant
Alersia McManus
Appellee

Document Text:

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-1893

MEL MARIN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

ALERSIA MCMANUS, in their personal capacities, jointly and 

severally; KATE HETHERINGTON, in their personal capacities, 

jointly and severally; HOWARD COMMUNITY COLLEGE, in their 

personal capacities, jointly and severally; ALLIED-BARTON, 

LLC, in their personal capacities, jointly and severally,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge. 

(1:14-cv-02014-RDB)

Submitted: December 22, 2014 Decided: January 7, 2015

Before KING, DUNCAN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Mel Marin, Appellant Pro Se. Eric Charles Brousaides, CARNEY, 

KELEHAN, BRESLER, BENNETT & SCHERR, LLP, Columbia, Maryland; 

Bruce Darren Burns, CARNEY, KELEHAN, BRESLER, BENNETT & SCHERR, 

LLP, Annapolis, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 14-1893 Doc: 10 Filed: 01/07/2015 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Mel Marin seeks to appeal the district court’s order

directing him to provide completed service forms and summons and 

the court’s order dismissing his civil complaint without 

prejudice for failure to comply with its instructions. See Fed. 

R. Civ. P. 41(b). We have reviewed the record and find no 

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated 

by the district court. Marin v. McManus, No. 1:14-cv-02014-RDB 

(D. Md. filed June 30, 2014 & entered July 1, 2014; July 31, 

2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

AFFIRMED 

Appeal: 14-1893 Doc: 10 Filed: 01/07/2015 Pg: 2 of 2