Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca10-19-03218/USCOURTS-ca10-19-03218-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Jose Martinez
Appellant
United States of America
Appellee

Document Text:

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

_________________________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

JOSE MARTINEZ, a/k/a Jose Lucas 

Martinez-Almaraz,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 19-3218

(D.C. No. 6:19-CR-10057-JWB-1)

(D. Kan.)

_________________________________

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

_________________________________

Before MATHESON, BACHARACH, and PHILLIPS, Circuit Judges.

_________________________________

This matter is before us on the Motion for Summary Disposition/Affirmance. 

The United States moves for summary affirmance based on this court’s recent 

published decision in United States v. Lira-Ramirez, 951 F.3d 1258 (10th Cir. 2020), 

en banc rev. denied May 1, 2020. While the appellant does not dispute that LiraRamirez controls the outcome of this appeal and does not contest summary 

* Upon consideration of the United States’ motion and the appellant’s status 

report filed May 7, 2020, this panel unanimously agrees that this matter can be 

submitted on these materials and without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 

34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). This order and judgment is not binding precedent, 

except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. It 

may be cited, however, for its persuasive value consistent with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 

and 10th Cir. R. 32.1.

FILED

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

May 13, 2020

Christopher M. Wolpert

Clerk of Court

Appellate Case: 19-3218 Document: 010110347058 Date Filed: 05/13/2020 Page: 1
2

affirmance of the district court’s judgment, he reserves the right to petition the 

United States Supreme Court for further review.

In light of the foregoing, the abatement of proceedings in this appeal is lifted, 

and the appellee’s motion for summary affirmance is granted. The judgment of the 

district court is affirmed.

Entered for the Court

Per Curiam

Appellate Case: 19-3218 Document: 010110347058 Date Filed: 05/13/2020 Page: 2