Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-03863/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-03863-2/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Palantir Technologies Inc.
Counter-defendant
Palantir.net, Inc.
Counter-claimant

Document Text:

FENWIC K &

WES T LLP

A TTO RN EYS A T L AW

M OU N TAI N VI EW

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING REQUEST TO EXCEED PAGE LIMITS

FOR RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY

INJUNCTION

CASE NO. C-07-3863 CRB

KATHRYN J. FRITZ (CSB NO. 148200)

FENWICK & WEST LLP

555 California Street, 12th floor

San Francisco, CA 94104

Telephone: (415) 875-2300

Facsimile: (415) 281-1350

Email: kfritz@fenwick.com

DWIGHT D. LUECK

BARNES & THORNBURG LLP

11 S. Meridian Street

Indianapolis, IN 46204-3506

Telephone: (317) 231-1313

Facsimile: (317) 231-7433

Email: dwight.lueck@btlaw.com

Attorneys for Plaintiff,

Palantir Technologies, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

PALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES INC.,

Plaintiff,

v.

PALANTIR.NET, INC.,

Defendant.

Case No. C-07-3863 CRB

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING

PALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES, INC.’S

MOTION FOR ADMINISTRATIVE

RELIEF TO FILE RESPONSE TO

DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR

PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION NOT TO

EXCEED 25 PAGES

Date: January 14, 2008

Time: 2:00 p.m.

Courtroom 8

Case 3:07-cv-03863-CRB Document 50 Filed 12/26/07 Page 1 of 2
FENWIC K &

WES T LLP

A TTO RN EYS A T L AW

M OU N TAI N VI EW

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING REQUEST TO EXCEED PAGE LIMITS

FOR RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY

INJUNCTION

2 CASE NO. C-07-3863 CRB

On December 24, 2007, Plaintiff Palantir Technologies, Inc.’s (“Palantir Technologies”)

filed its Motion for Administrative Relief to File Response in Opposition to Defendant’s Motion

for Preliminary Injunction Not to Exceed 25 Pages. The Court has read the papers, the Motion

being unopposed and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

1. Palantir Technologies’ motion is GRANTED.

2. Palantir Technologies may file its response to Defendant’s Motion for Preliminary

Injunction not to exceed 25 pages.

3. The briefing schedule shall remain the same.

Dated: ____________, 2008

Honorable Charles Breyer

United States District Court Judge

Northern District of California

December 26, 2007

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Charles R. Breyer

Case 3:07-cv-03863-CRB Document 50 Filed 12/26/07 Page 2 of 2