Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_09-cv-01463/USCOURTS-cand-4_09-cv-01463-4/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
LaTanya Benson
Plaintiff
San Francisco Unified School District
Defendant
Angie Sharbaugh
Defendant
T.M.
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 1 C09-01463 CW

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE DEADLINE TO ANSWER SECOND 

AMENDED COMPLAINT OR ANSWER THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT

Fagen Friedman & Fulfrost, LLP 

70 Washington Street, Suite 205 

Oakland, California 94607 

Main: 510-550-8200 • Fax: 510-550-8211

Douglas N. Freifeld, SBN 114804 

dfreifeld@fagenfriedman.com 

Lenore Silverman, SBN 146112 

lsilverman@fagenfriedman.com 

Joshua A. Stevens, SBN 228239 

jstevens@fagenfriedman.com 

FAGEN FRIEDMAN & FULFROST, LLP 

70 Washington Street, Suite 205 

Oakland, California 94607 

Phone: 510-550-8200 

Fax: 510-550-8211 

Attorneys for Defendants SAN FRANCISCO 

UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT and ANGIE 

SHARBAUGH 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, OAKLAND DIVISION 

T.M., a minor, by Guardian ad Litem 

LATANYA BENSON and LATANYA 

BENSON, 

Plaintiffs, 

vs. 

SAN FRANCISCO UNIFIED SCHOOL 

DISTRICT and ANGIE SHARBAUGH, 

Defendant. 

 CASE NO. C09-01463 CW 

JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER TO 

CONTINUE DEADLINE TO ANSWER 

SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT OR 

RESPOND TO THIRD AMENDED 

COMPLAINT 

Trial Date: None 

SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THIS COURT, THE PARTIES HEREBY 

STIPULATE TO THE FOLLOWING:

WHEREAS, on or about January 16, 2010, the Court granted in part and denied in part the 

San Francisco Unified School District's ("District") and Angie Sharbaugh's (collectively the 

"Defendants") Motion to Dismiss portions of Plaintiffs' Second Amended Complaint ("SAC"); 

WHEREAS, in the Court's Order, Plaintiffs were granted leave to amend to file a Third 

Amended Complaint ("TAC") within twenty-one days from date of the Order to pursue only 

certain claims as specified by the Court in the Order; 

WHEREAS, the Court further ordered that "[i]f Plaintiffs do not file a TAC, Defendants' 

answer to the SAC is due two weeks from the date of this Order;" 

Case 4:09-cv-01463-CW Document 34 Filed 02/01/10 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 2 C09-01463 CW

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE DEADLINE TO ANSWER SECOND 

AMENDED COMPLAINT OR ANSWER THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT

Fagen Friedman & Fulfrost, LLP 

70 Washington Street, Suite 205 

Oakland, California 94607 

Main: 510-550-8200 • Fax: 510-550-8211

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs' deadline to file a TAC falls after Defendants' deadline to answer 

the SAC, and the parties recognize that judicial economy and the parties' resources would be better 

served by continuing the deadline for Defendants to answer the SAC so that it is aligned with the 

Court ordered deadline to answer or move to dismiss a potential TAC; 

WHEREAS, the Court has ordered that if Plaintiffs wish to file a TAC, they must do so 

within twenty-one days (by February 8, 2010) from the date of the Court's January 16, 2010 order; 

WHEREAS, the Court has further ordered that if Plaintiffs file a TAC, Defendants' answer 

or motion to dismiss is due three weeks from the date the TAC is filed, Plaintiffs' opposition is due 

two weeks thereafter and Defendants' reply is due one week thereafter; 

NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the 

parties, by and through their respective undersigned counsel, that if Plaintiffs do not file a TAC, 

Defendants' answer to the SAC is due three weeks from Plaintiffs' February 8, 2010 deadline to 

file a TAC. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

DATED: January 27, 2010 Respectfully submitted, 

FAGEN FRIEDMAN & FULFROST, LLP 

 By: /s/ Joshua A. Stevens 

 Joshua A. Stevens 

Attorneys for Defendants SAN FRANCISCO 

UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT and ANGIE 

SHARBAUGH 

DATED: January 27, 2010 Respectfully submitted, 

ADAMS ESQ, A Professional Corporation 

 By: /s/ Jean Adams 

 Jean Adams 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs T.M., a minor, by 

Guardian ad Litem LATANYA BENSON and 

LATANYA BENSON 

Case 4:09-cv-01463-CW Document 34 Filed 02/01/10 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 3 C09-01463 CW

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE DEADLINE TO ANSWER SECOND 

AMENDED COMPLAINT OR ANSWER THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT

Fagen Friedman & Fulfrost, LLP 

70 Washington Street, Suite 205 

Oakland, California 94607 

Main: 510-550-8200 • Fax: 510-550-8211

ORDER 

 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, pursuant to the above Stipulation of the parties, that the 

deadline for Defendants to answer the SAC or answer or move to dismiss a potential TAC is 

continued as outlined above. 

 2/1/10 

DATED: ___________________ __________________________________ 

 Hon. Claudia Wilken 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

00239.00157/178373.1 

Case 4:09-cv-01463-CW Document 34 Filed 02/01/10 Page 3 of 3