Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_10-cv-03908/USCOURTS-cand-3_10-cv-03908-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Bradley Aug
Plaintiff
Robert Badella
Plaintiff
DeltaBreeze Holdings Ltd.
Defendant
Deniro Marketing, LLC
Defendant
Louis Febus
Plaintiff
Alan Henning
Defendant
Robert W. Jeffries
Plaintiff
Thomas Jones
Defendant
Robert Langford
Plaintiff
Modena Marketing Inc.
Defendant
Pen Help Ltd.
Defendant
Piranha New Media Ltd.
Defendant
Michael Shane York
Plaintiff

Document Text:

Case No. 3:10-cv-03908-CRB – Stipulated Request for Order Extending Time 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Gary Jay Kaufman, Esq. (State Bar No. 92759) 

gary@kaufmanlawgroupla.com 

Colin Hardacre, Esq. (State Bar No. 250915) 

colin@kaufmanlawgroupla.com 

THE KAUFMAN LAW GROUP 

1901 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 1010 

Los Angeles, California 90067 

Telephone: (310) 286-2202 

Facsimile: (310) 712-0023 

Attorneys for Defendants, 

Deniro Marketing, LLC, Allan Henning, 

Modena Marketing Inc. and Deltabreeze Holdings Ltd. 

 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

ROBERT BADELLA, individually and on 

behalf of all persons similarly situated, 

BRADLEY AUG, individually and on behalf of

all persons similarly situated, LOUIS FEBUS, 

individually and on behalf of all persons 

similarly situated, ROBERT LANGFORD, 

individually and on behalf of all persons 

similarly situated, MICHAEL SHANE YORK, 

individually and on behalf of all persons 

similarly situated, and ROBERT W. JEFFRIES, 

individually and on behalf of all persons 

similarly situated, 

 Plaintiffs, 

 v. 

DENIRO MARKETING, LLC, a California 

limited liability company, ALAN HENNING, 

an individual, MODENA MARKETING INC., 

an Antigua and Barbuda corporation, THOMAS 

JONES, an individual, PIRANHA NEW 

MEDIA LTD., a United Kingdom corporation, 

DELTABREEZE HOLDINGS LTD., a Cyprus 

corporation, PEN HELP LTD., a United 

Kingdom corporation, and DOES 1-100, 

 Defendants. 

 Case No. 3:10-cv-03908-CRB 

Hon. Charles R. Breyer 

STIPULATED REQUEST FOR AN ORDER 

EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANTS 

TO FILE REPLY MEMORANDUMS IN 

SUPPORT OF THEIR MOTIONS TO 

DISMISS 

(PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 6-2; FIRST 

REQUEST) 

Hearing Date: January 21, 2011 (Friday) 

Time: 10:00 a.m. 

Crtrm: 8 

Case 3:10-cv-03908-CRB Document 38 Filed 01/06/11 Page 1 of 3
Case No. 3:10-cv-03908-CRB – Stipulated Request for Order Extending Time - 1 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 Plaintiffs and Defendants stipulate by and through their respective counsel of record as follows: 

 WHEREAS, on December 1, 2010, Deniro Marketing, LLC, Allan Henning, Modena 

Marketing Inc. and Deltabreeze Holdings Ltd. filed motions to dismiss Plaintiffs’ complaint pursuant 

to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6), 12(b)(2) and 9(b); 

 WHEREAS, the hearing on Defendants’ motions is currently set for January 21, 2011 at 10:00 

a.m. in Courtroom 8 of the above-entitled court; 

 WHEREAS, Plaintiffs filed their oppositions to Defendants’ motions on January 3, 2011. As a 

result, Defendants will have only four days within which to analyze Plaintiffs’ oppositions and draft 

and file their replies (the current due date is January 7, 2011); 

 WHEREAS, Plaintiffs and Defendants agree that Defendants may have an additional three days 

to file and serve their respective reply memorandums, up to and including January 10, 2011; 

 WHEREAS, this is Defendants’ first request for an extension of time to file and serve their 

respective reply memorandums; 

 WHEREAS, the requested extension of time will result in the Court’s losing one (1) business 

day within which to review the reply memorandums; 

 THEREFORE, Plaintiffs and Defendants hereby request that the Court grant Defendants an 

extension of time within which to file and serve their respective reply memorandums in response to 

Plaintiffs’ oppositions, up to and including January 10, 2011. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD 

Dated: January 4, 2011 THE KAUFMAN LAW GROUP 

 By:__________/s/____________ 

 Gary Jay Kaufman 

 Attorneys for Defendants 

Dated: January 4, 2011 GARBARINI LAW GROUP P.C. 

 

 By:___________/s/___________ 

 Richard Garbarini, with permission 

 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

Case 3:10-cv-03908-CRB Document 38 Filed 01/06/11 Page 2 of 3
Case No. 3:10-cv-03908-CRB – Stipulated Request for Order Extending Time - 2 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED 

DATED: ___________________ ____________________________________ 

 CHARLES R. BREYER 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

ATTESTATION: Pursuant to General Order 45, § 10(B), I hereby attest that concurrence in the filing 

of the foregoing document has been obtained from each of the other signatories. 

Dated: January 4, 2011 ____/s/Gary Jay Kaufman__

January 6, 2011

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Charles R. Breyer

Case 3:10-cv-03908-CRB Document 38 Filed 01/06/11 Page 3 of 3