Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_05-cr-00603/USCOURTS-azd-2_05-cr-00603-2/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Antonio Cervantes-Panchis
Defendant
United States of America
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 1 The docket numbers refer to the docket for CR 05-603-PHX-SMM.

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Antonio Cervantes-Panchis

Petitioner, 

v.

United States of America

Respondent.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CIV 05-3080-PHX-SMM

 CR 05- 603- PHX- SMM

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND

ORDER

Pending before the Court is Movant’s pro se Motion To Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct

Sentence By A Person in Federal Custody filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Doc. No. 16).1

The matter was referred to Magistrate Judge Hector C. Estrada for Report and

Recommendation. On October 4, 2007 the Magistrate Judge filed a Report and

Recommendation with this Court (Doc. 24). To date, no objections have been filed.

STANDARD OF REVIEW

The Court “may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or

recommendations made by the magistrate.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C); see Baxter v. Sullivan,

923 F.2d 1391, 1394 (9th Cir. 1991). Parties have ten days from the service of a copy of the

Magistrate's recommendation within which to file specific written objections to the Court.

28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 6, 72. Failure to object to a Magistrate Judge’s

Case 2:05-cr-00603-SMM Document 27 Filed 02/07/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 - 2 -

recommendation relieves the Court of conducting de novo review of the Magistrate Judge’s

factual findings and waives all objections to those findings on appeal. See Turner v. Duncan,

158 F.3d 449, 455 (9th Cir. 1998). A failure to object to a Magistrate Judge’s conclusion “is

a factor to be weighed in considering the propriety of finding waiver of an issue on appeal.”

Turner v. Duncan, 158 F.3d 449, 455 (9th Cir. 1998).

DISCUSSION

Having reviewed the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, and no

Objections having been made by any party thereto, the Court hereby incorporates and adopts

the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation.

CONCLUSION

For the reasons set forth herein,

 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Court adopts the Report and Recommendation

of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. 24).

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner’s Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or

Correct Sentence By A Person in Federal Custody is DENIED (Doc. 16), thereby

terminating CV-05-3080-PHX-SMM (HCE).

DATED this 6th day of February, 2008.

Case 2:05-cr-00603-SMM Document 27 Filed 02/07/08 Page 2 of 2