Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_09-cv-02304/USCOURTS-caed-2_09-cv-02304-13/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Interactive Intelligence, Inc.
Defendant
Mujeeb Puzhakkaraillath
Defendant
Mohit Randhawa
Plaintiff
Shannon CallNet Pvt Ltd
Plaintiff
Harpal Singh
Plaintiff
Skylux Telelink PVT LTD
Defendant
Skylux, Inc.
Defendant

Document Text:

_____________________________________________________________________________ 

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED [ORDER] TO CONTINUE HEARING DATE FOR PLAINTIFFS’ 

MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE FOURTH AMENDED COMPLAINT AND TO NOTICE DEFENDANT 

INTERACTIVE’S MOTION TO DISMISS AND FOR SANCTIONS FOR THE SAME DATE 

-1- 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

Gregg A. Rapoport (SBN 136941) 

BUSINESS LEGAL PARTNERS

135 W. Green Street, Suite 100 

Pasadena, CA 91105 

Tel. 626-585-0155 Fax. 626-578-1827 

grapoport@bizlegalpartners.com 

Attorney for Defendants 

SKYLUX INC., INTERACTIVE INTELLIGENCE, INC., and MUJEEB PUZHAKKARAILLATH 

Constance R. Lindman (pro hac vice) OVERHAUSER & LINDMAN, LLC 

740 W. Green Meadows Dr., Ste. 300 

Greenfield, IN 46140 

Tel. 317-891-1500 Fax. 866-283-8549 

crlindman@overhauser.com 

Attorneys for Defendant 

INTERACTIVE INTELLIGENCE, INC. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – SACRAMENTO DIVISION 

MOHIT RANDHAWA aka HARPAL 

SINGH, and SHANNON CALLNET 

PVT LTD, 

 Plaintiffs, 

v. 

SKYLUX INC., INTERACTIVE 

INTELLIGENCE, INC., MUJEEB 

PUZHAKKARAILLATH, SKYLUX 

TELELINK PVT LTD; and DOES 1 

through 

20, inclusive. 

 Defendants. 

 Case No. 2:09−CV−02304−WBS−KJN

Hon. William B. Shubb 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER TO CONTINUE HEARING 

DATE FOR PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION 

FOR LEAVE TO FILE FOURTH 

AMENDED COMPLAINT AND TO 

NOTICE DEFENDANT 

INTERACTIVE’S MOTION TO 

DISMISS AND FOR SANCTIONS 

FOR THE SAME DATE

 WHEREAS: 

1. On April 6, 2010, Plaintiffs Mohit Randhawa and Shannon Callnet 

Pvt Ltd. (“Shannon Callnet”) filed a Motion for Leave to File Fourth Amended 

Case 2:09-cv-02304-WBS-KJN Document 72 Filed 04/29/10 Page 1 of 4
_____________________________________________________________________________ 

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED [ORDER] TO CONTINUE HEARING DATE FOR PLAINTIFFS’ 

MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE FOURTH AMENDED COMPLAINT AND TO NOTICE DEFENDANT 

INTERACTIVE’S MOTION TO DISMISS AND FOR SANCTIONS FOR THE SAME DATE 

-2- 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

Complaint (Docket No. 65) (the “Motion for Leave”). The hearing on this Motion 

is set for May 24, 2010. 

2. On April 26, 2010, Defendant Interactive Intelligence, Inc. 

(“Interactive”) filed a Motion to Dismiss Claims by Plaintiff Shannon Callnet and 

for Sanctions (Docket No. 69) (the “Motion to Dismiss”). 

3. Interactive noticed the Motion to Dismiss for the same date as the 

Motion for Leave because the issues presented in the Motion for Leave and the 

Motion to Dismiss are related. Shannon Callnet seeks leave to file a Fourth 

Amended Complaint that includes claims against Interactive. (Dkt 65 Ex 1) 

Interactive contends that the proposed Fourth Amended Complaint does not 

comply with this Court’s March 4 Order (Dkt 61), Shannon Callnet should not be 

permitted to bring claims against Interactive in a Fourth Amended Complaint, and 

Shannon Callnet’s claims against Interactive should be dismissed. Interactive 

agrees that if Shannon Callnet files a cross-motion for sanctions against 

Interactive, Shannon Callnet may notice such motion for June 7, 2010. 

4. In order to avoid unnecessary expense and effort for both the Court 

and the parties, the parties, through their respective counsel of record herein, agree 

that it is in the interest of judicial economy to combine the hearing on the Motion 

for Leave and the Motion to Dismiss because the issues presented are related. 

NOW THEREFORE, the parties, through their counsel of record herein, 

STIPULATE AND AGREE to the following: 

 Plaintiffs’ Motion for Leave, now set for hearing on May 24, 2010, is 

continued to June 7, 2010. The notice date for Interactive’s Motion to Dismiss is 

changed from May 24, 2010 to June 7, 2010. 

Case 2:09-cv-02304-WBS-KJN Document 72 Filed 04/29/10 Page 2 of 4
_____________________________________________________________________________ 

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED [ORDER] TO CONTINUE HEARING DATE FOR PLAINTIFFS’ 

MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE FOURTH AMENDED COMPLAINT AND TO NOTICE DEFENDANT 

INTERACTIVE’S MOTION TO DISMISS AND FOR SANCTIONS FOR THE SAME DATE 

-3- 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

DATED: April 28, 2010 OVERHAUSER & LINDMAN, LLC 

 /s/ Constance R. Lindman 

CONSTANCE R. LINDMAN 

Attorney for Defendant 

 INTERACTIVE INTELLIGENCE, INC 

DATED: April 28, 2010 BUSINESS LEGAL PARTNERS 

 

 /s/ Gregg A. Rapoport 

GREGG A. RAPOPORT 

[authorized signature] 

Attorney for Defendants 

INTERACTIVE INTELLIGENCE, INC 

SKYLUX, INC., MUJEEB 

PUZHAKKARAILLATH and SKYLUX 

TELELINK PVT LTD 

DATED: April 28, 2010 THE LAW OFFICE OF JAY IAN 

 ABOUDI 

 /s/ Jay Ian Aboudi 

[authorized signature] 

JAY ABOUDI 

Attorney for Plaintiffs 

MOHIT RANDHAWA aka HARPAL 

SINGH and SHANNON CALLNET PVT 

LTD 

Case 2:09-cv-02304-WBS-KJN Document 72 Filed 04/29/10 Page 3 of 4
_____________________________________________________________________________ 

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED [ORDER] TO CONTINUE HEARING DATE FOR PLAINTIFFS’ 

MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE FOURTH AMENDED COMPLAINT AND TO NOTICE DEFENDANT 

INTERACTIVE’S MOTION TO DISMISS AND FOR SANCTIONS FOR THE SAME DATE 

-4- 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

ORDER 

Based on the stipulation entered by the parties, IT IS ORDERED THAT 

Plaintiffs’ Motion for Leave, now set for hearing on May 24, 2010, is continued to 

June 7, 2010at 2:00 p.m. and the notice date for Interactive’s Motion to Dismiss is 

changed from May 24, 2010 to June 7, 2010 at 2:00 p.m. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: April 28, 2010 

Case 2:09-cv-02304-WBS-KJN Document 72 Filed 04/29/10 Page 4 of 4