Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_15-cv-00646/USCOURTS-caed-1_15-cv-00646-2/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Kirk Bunch
Defendant
Adam Christianson
Defendant
County of Stanislaus
Defendant
John Evers
Defendant
Birgit Fladager
Defendant
David Harris
Defendant
Joyteshna Karan
Plaintiff
Frank Navarro
Defendant
Praveen Singh
Plaintiff
Stanislaus County Sheriff Department
Defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

PRAVEEN SINGH, an individual; 

and JOYTESHNA KARAN, an 

individual,

Plaintiffs,

v.

KIRK BUNCH, an individual; 

FRANK NAVARRO, an individual;

JOHN EVERS, an individual; 

DAVID HARRIS; BIRGIT 

FLADAGER; THE COUNTY OF 

STANISLAUS, a government 

entity; ADAM CHRISTIANSON;

STANISLAUS COUNTY SHERIFF 

DEPARTMENT, a government 

entity; and DOES 1 – 100, 

inclusive;

Defendants.

No. 1:15-cv-00646-GEB-BAM

ORDER CONTINUING STATUS 

(PRETRIAL SCHEDULING) 

CONFERENCE; FED. R. CIV. P. 4(M) 

NOTICE

The Joint Status Report filed November 9, 2015, reveals 

this case is not ready to be scheduled. The parties state: “FRANK 

NAVARRO and JOHN EVERS have not made any appearance.” (JSR 2:7, 

ECF No. 23.) However, it is unclear whether these defendants have 

been served with process, and Plaintiffs do not indicate how they 

intend to prosecute this action against them, if they have been 

served. 

Therefore, the Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference 

scheduled for hearing on November 23, 2015, is continued to 

Case 1:15-cv-00646-DAD-BAM Document 24 Filed 11/18/15 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

February 1, 2016, at 9:00 a.m. A further joint status report 

shall be filed no later than fourteen (14) days prior to the 

Status Conference, in which Plaintiffs shall address their 

efforts to prosecute this case against Defendants Frank Navarro 

and John Evers. Plaintiffs are notified that these defendants may 

be dismissed with prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 

41(b) if Plaintiffs fail to prosecute their claim(s) against 

them. 

Further, Plaintiffs are notified under Rule 4(m) of the 

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure that failure to serve Defendants 

Frank Navarro and John Evers with process may result in the 

unserved defendant(s) being dismissed. To avoid dismissal, on or 

before November 30, 2015, Plaintiffs shall file proof of service 

for these defendants or a sufficient explanation why service was 

not completed within Rule 4(m)’s prescribed service period.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: November 17, 2015

Case 1:15-cv-00646-DAD-BAM Document 24 Filed 11/18/15 Page 2 of 2