Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-01845/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-01845-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Barbara A. Adair
Defendant
Aaron E. Adair
Defendant
Scott N. Johnson
Plaintiff
Sacramento Family Medical Clinic
Defendant
Sacramento Family Medical Clinic, Inc.
Defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SCOTT N. JOHNSON,

Plaintiff,

v. CIV. NO. S-07-1829 LKK/DAD

STEVEN D. ADAMS; DIANE L.

ADAMS; SACRAMENTO FAMILY

MEDICAL CLINIC, INC.,

individually and dba 

SACRAMENTO FAMILY MEDICAL

CLINIC, RELATED CASE ORDER

Defendants.

 /

SCOTT N. JOHNSON,

Plaintiff,

v. CIV. NO. S-07-1845 LEW/EFB

AARON E. ADAIR and BARBARA A.

ADAIR, each individually and

each as TRUSTEES OF THE ADAIR

REVOCABLE LIVING TRUST, dated

February 26, 1986; SACRAMENTO

MEDICAL CLINIC, INC., individually

and dba SACRAMENTO FAMILY MEDICAL

CLINIC,

Defendants.

 /

Case 2:07-cv-01845-LKK -DAD Document 8 Filed 10/17/07 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

SCOTT N. JOHNSON,

Plaintiff,

v. CIV. S-07-1846 GEB/EFB

 

WORTHMANN FAMILY PARTNERSHIP,

L.P.; SACRAMENTO FAMILY 

MEDICAL CLINIC., INC., 

individually and dba SACRAMENTO

FAMILY MEDICAL CLINIC,

Defendants.

 /

SCOTT N. JOHNSON,

Plaintiff,

CIV. S-07-1851 GEB/KJM

v.

SYLVA FAMILY PROPERTIES, a

CALIFORNIA GENERAL PARTNERSHIP;

SACRAMENTO FAMILY MEDICAL

CLINIC, INC., individually and

dba SACRAMENTO FAMILY MEDICAL

CLINIC,

Defendants.

 /

Examination of the above-entitled actions reveals that 

the four (4) actions are related within the meaning of Local Rule

83-123 for the reasons that all four actions involve the same

parties, are based on the same or similar claims, involve the same

property, transaction or event and involve similar questions of

fact and the same question of law. 

Accordingly, the assignment of the matters to the same judge

and magistrate judge is likely to effect a substantial savings of

judicial effort and is also likely to be convenient for the

parties.

Case 2:07-cv-01845-LKK -DAD Document 8 Filed 10/17/07 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

3

The parties should be aware that relating the cases under

Local Rule 83-123 merely has the result that the three (3) actions

are assigned to the same judge and magistrate judge; no

consolidation of the actions is effected. Under the regular

practice of this court, related cases are generally assigned to the

judge and magistrate judge to whom the first filed action was

assigned. 

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the actions denominated CIV. NO.

S-07-1845 LEW/EFB, CIV. NO. S-07-1846 GEB/EFB and CIV. NO. S-07-

1851 GEB/KJM be, and the same hereby are, reassigned to Judge

Lawrence K. Karlton and Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd for all

further proceedings, and any dates currently set in the reassigned

cases only, are hereby VACATED. Henceforth, the caption on

documents filed in the reassigned cases shall be shown as CIV. NO.

S-07-1845 LKK/DAD, CIV. NO. S-07-1846 LKK/DAD and CIV. NO. S-07-

1851 LKK/DAD, respectively. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court make

appropriate adjustment in the assignment of civil cases to

compensate for this reassignment.

DATED: October 17, 2007.

 

Case 2:07-cv-01845-LKK -DAD Document 8 Filed 10/17/07 Page 3 of 3