Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00048/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00048-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Board of Prison Terms
Defendant
Eric Lee Hackett
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ERIC LEE HACKETT,

Plaintiff,

vs.

BOARD OF PRISON TERMS, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

1:05-cv-00048-OWW-LJO-P

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATION (Doc. 6)

ORDER DISMISSING ACTION,

WITHOUT PREJUDICE, FOR FAILURE

TO OBEY A COURT ORDER (Doc. 5)

Plaintiff Eric Lee Hackett (“plaintiff”) is a state prisoner

proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C.

§ 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate

Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72-302.

On March 29, 2005, the Magistrate Judge filed a Findings and

Recommendation herein which was served on plaintiff and which

contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the Findings

and Recommendation were to be filed within thirty (30) days. On

April 4, 2005, plaintiff filed objections to the Magistrate Judge’s

Findings and Recommendation.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C)

and Local Rule 73-305, this Court has conducted a de novo review of

Case 1:05-cv-00048-OWW -LJO Document 10 Filed 05/19/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court

finds the Findings and Recommendation to be supported by the record

and by proper analysis.

Although plaintiff filed objections, plaintiff sets forth no

grounds that support not adopting the Findings and Recommendations.

Plaintiff was ordered by the court to either pay the filing fee in

full or file a completed application to proceed in forma pauperis

within thirty days. The order was served on plaintiff at his

address of record with the court. Plaintiff has provided no

explanation for his failure to obey the court’s order and has

provided no grounds that justify setting aside the Findings and

Recommendations.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendation, filed March 29, 2005, is

ADOPTED IN FULL;

2. This action is DISMISSED, without prejudice, based on

plaintiff’s failure to obey the court’s order of February

18, 2005; and

3. All other pending motions are denied, without prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 19, 2005 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger 

emm0d6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:05-cv-00048-OWW -LJO Document 10 Filed 05/19/05 Page 2 of 2