Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-08-01372/USCOURTS-ca4-08-01372-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Charles Austin

Donnie Balzeigler

City of Columbia

Larry McCall

Hunter P. Swanson
Appellee
Carolyn Yvonne Murphy Taylor
Appellant
Dana Marie Thye
Appellee
Walter Todd
Appellee

Document Text:

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-1372

CAROLYN YVONNE MURPHY TAYLOR,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

WALTER TODD, Esq., in his official capacity as Assistant City

Attorney and his individual capacity; DANA MARIE THYE, Esq.,

in her official capacity as Assistant City Attorney and her

individual capacity; HUNTER P. SWANSON, Esq., in her official

capacity as Assistant City Attorney and her individual

capacity,

Defendants - Appellees,

and

CHARLES AUSTIN, in his official capacity as City Manager and his

individual capacity; DONNIE BALZEIGLER, in his official capacity as

Code Enforcement Officer and his individual capacity; CITY OF

COLUMBIA, LARRY MCCALL, in his official capacity as Chief Code

Enforcement Officer and his individual capacity.

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Columbia. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., Chief

District Judge. (3:07-cv-00983-JFA-JRM)

Submitted: August 21, 2008 Decided: August 25, 2008

Before WILLIAMS, Chief Judge, and KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Appeal: 08-1372 Doc: 17 Filed: 08/25/2008 Pg: 1 of 3
2

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Carolyn Yvonne Murphy Taylor, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Gordon

Cooper, OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina, for

Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 08-1372 Doc: 17 Filed: 08/25/2008 Pg: 2 of 3
3

PER CURIAM:

Carolyn Yvonne Murphy Taylor appeals the district court’s

order accepting in part and declining in part the magistrate

judge’s recommendation, and dismissing her action filed under 42

U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) and the South Carolina Torts Claims Act. We

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. Taylor v. Todd, No. 3:07-cv-00983-JFA-JRM (D.S.C. Feb. 29,

2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Appeal: 08-1372 Doc: 17 Filed: 08/25/2008 Pg: 3 of 3