Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-00675/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-00675-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Ronald Camarena Escobedo
Plaintiff
Unknown
Defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RONALD CAMARENA ESCOBEDO,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-07-0675 MCE EFB P

vs.

UNKNOWN, et al.,

Defendants. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

On May 15, 2007, the court ordered plaintiff to file an in forma pauperis affidavit or pay

the appropriate filing fee within 30 days and warned him that failure to do so would result in a

recommendation that this action be dismissed. 

The 30-day period has expired and plaintiff has not filed a completed in forma pauperis

affidavit or paid the appropriate filing fee.

It therefore is RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice.

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty days

after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written

objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned

“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Failure to file objections 

Case 2:07-cv-00675-MCE -EFB Document 9 Filed 12/04/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Turner v.

Duncan, 158 F.3d 449, 455 (9th Cir. 1998); Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

Dated: December 3, 2007.

Case 2:07-cv-00675-MCE -EFB Document 9 Filed 12/04/07 Page 2 of 2