Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-07-07296/USCOURTS-ca4-07-07296-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Officer Anderson
Appellee
Officer Brunson
Appellee
Jane Doe
Appellee
Officer Dubose
Appellee
Jimmy Duncan
Appellant
N. Gordon
Appellee
Sergeant Roberts
Appellee

Document Text:

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

 No. 07-7296 

JIMMY DUNCAN, a/k/a Jimmy L. Duncan,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

N. GORDON, Sergeant, Lee Correctional

Institution; JANE DOE, a/k/a NFN Slade, Nurse,

Lee Correctional Institution; JANE DOE, a/k/a

NFN Robinson, Nurse, Lee Correctional

Institution; OFFICER ANDERSON, NFN, Lee

Correctional Institution; OFFICER DUBOSE, NFN,

Lee Correctional Institution; OFFICER BRUNSON,

NFN, Lee Correctional Institution; SERGEANT

ROBERTS, a/k/a NFN Robertson, NFN, Lee

Correctional Institution,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Anderson. Margaret B. Seymour, District Judge.

(8:06-cv-00396-MBS)

Submitted: December 20, 2007 Decided: December 28, 2007

Before MICHAEL and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Appeal: 07-7296 Doc: 15 Filed: 12/28/2007 Pg: 1 of 3
- 2 -

Jimmy Duncan, Appellant Pro Se. John Evans James, III, LEE, ERTER,

WILSON, JAMES, HOLLER & SMITH, LLC, Sumter, South Carolina, for

Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 07-7296 Doc: 15 Filed: 12/28/2007 Pg: 2 of 3
- 3 -

PER CURIAM:

Jimmy Duncan appeals the district court’s order accepting

the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on

his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint, and a subsequent order

denying his motion to alter or amend judgment and motion to stay.

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. Duncan v. Gordon, No. 8:06-cv-00396-MBS (D.S.C. Mar. 29,

2007; filed July 11, 2007 & entered July 12, 2007). We further

deny Duncan’s motions to authorize preparation of transcript at

government expense and for default judgment. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Appeal: 07-7296 Doc: 15 Filed: 12/28/2007 Pg: 3 of 3