Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-07-07123/USCOURTS-ca4-07-07123-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Wallace Alston
Appellee
FTI Barnes
Appellee
Brian E. Britton
Appellee
Denise Brown
Appellee
Charleston County Detention Center
Appellee
Matthey R. Downing
Appellee
Steven C. Durbin
Appellee
Keith K. Franklin
Appellee
Henry Gathers
Appellee
Tessa Rani Gibson
Appellant
Lisa A. Gonzalez-Williams
Appellee
Officer Greathouse
Appellee
Arthur L. Grey
Appellee
FTI Hennix
Appellee
Officer James
Appellee
Mark A. Lewis
Appellee
Donald V. Salters
Appellee
Kenneth E. Sponic
Appellee
Michael Tice
Appellee
Walter Wright
Appellee

Document Text:

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-7123

TESSA RANI GIBSON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

CHARLESTON COUNTY DETENTION CENTER; MARK A.

LEWIS; DONALD V. SALTERS; BRIAN E. BRITTON;

MATTHEY R. DOWNING; DENISE BROWN; LISA A.

GONZALEZ-WILLIAMS; KEITH K. FRANKLIN;

ARTHUR L. GREY; FTI BARNES; FTI HENNIX;

OFFICER JAMES; OFFICER GREATHOUSE; KENNETH E.

SPONIC; MICHAEL TICE; WALTER WRIGHT; HENRY

GATHERS; STEVEN C. DURBIN; WALLACE ALSTON,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Charleston. Patrick Michael Duffy, District

Judge. (2:07-cv-01364-PMD)

Submitted: December 13, 2007 Decided: December 19, 2007

Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Tessa Rani Gibson, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 07-7123 Doc: 9 Filed: 12/19/2007 Pg: 1 of 2
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Tessa Rani Gibson appeals the district court’s order

denying her motion to reconsider its order accepting the

recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on her 42

U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons

stated by the district court. Gibson v. Charleston County Det.

Ctr., No. 2:07-cv-01364-PMD (D.S.C. July 26, 2007). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Appeal: 07-7123 Doc: 9 Filed: 12/19/2007 Pg: 2 of 2