Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-01712/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-01712-3/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Orlando Cerda
Plaintiff
Sacramento City Police K-9 Division
Defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ORLANDO CERDA,

Plaintiff,

v.

SACRAMENTO CITY POLICE K-9 

DIVISION,

Defendants.

No. 2:14-cv-1712 KJN P

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

Plaintiff is a proceeding without counsel. Plaintiff consented to proceed before the 

undersigned for all purposes. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). By order filed September 19, 2014, 

plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed and thirty days leave to file an amended complaint was 

granted. The thirty day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint 

or otherwise responded to the court’s order.

Although it appears from the file that plaintiff’s copy of the order was returned, plaintiff 

was properly served. It is the plaintiff’s responsibility to keep the court apprised of his current 

address at all times. Pursuant to Local Rule 182(f), service of documents at the record address of 

the party is fully effective.

////

////

////

Case 2:14-cv-01712-KJN Document 9 Filed 10/24/14 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that within thirty days from the date of this 

order, plaintiff shall show cause why this action should not be dismissed without prejudice. See

Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

Dated: October 24, 2014

/cerd1712.osc

Case 2:14-cv-01712-KJN Document 9 Filed 10/24/14 Page 2 of 2