Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-00130/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-00130-8/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
William Barnett
Plaintiff
Southern California Edison Company Long Term Disability Plan
Defendant

Document Text:

LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.

A P R O F E S S I O N A L C O R P O R A T I O N

5 2 0 0 N o r t h P a l m A v e n u e

S u i t e 3 0 2

F r e s n o , C A 9 3 7 0 4 . 2 2 2 5

5 5 9 . 2 4 4 . 7 5 0 0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

FURTHER STIPULATION TO EXTEND 

TIME Case No. 1:12-CV-00130-LJO-DLB

TANYA A. GUZMAN, Bar No. 252256

2244 Walnut Grove Avenue, Suite 360D

Rosemead, CA 91770

Telephone: 626.302.6875

Facsimile: 626.302.1910

Email: Tanya.a.guzman@sce.com

KEITH A. JACOBY, Bar No. 150233

DEMERY RYAN, Bar No. 217176

LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.

2049 Century Park East, Fifth Floor

Los Angeles, CA 90067

Telephone: 310.553.0308

Facsimile: 310.553.5583

Email: kjacoby@littler.com; 

dryan@littler.com

Attorneys for Defendant

SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 

COMPANY LONG TERM DISABILITY 

PLAN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

FRESNO DIVISION

WILLIAM BARNETT,

Plaintiff,

v.

SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 

EDISON COMPANY LONG TERM 

DISABILITY PLAN,

Defendant.

Case No. 1:12-CV-00130-LJO-DLB 

SECOND STIPULATION TO 

EXTEND TIME TO FILE JOINT 

(PROPOSED) FORM OF ORDER 

AND ORDER GRANTING 

EXTENSION OF TIME

Case 1:12-cv-00130-LJO-SAB Document 97 Filed 08/11/16 Page 1 of 3
LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.

A P R O F E S S I O N A L C O R P O R A T I O N

5 2 0 0 N o r t h P a l m A v e n u e

S u i t e 3 0 2

F r e s n o , C A 9 3 7 0 4 . 2 2 2 5

5 5 9 . 2 4 4 . 7 5 0 0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

FURTHER STIPULATION TO EXTEND 

TIME Case No. 1:12-CV-00130-LJO-DLB 

A Memorandum Decision and Order Granting Defendant’s Motion for 

Summary Judgment and Granting in Part and Denying in Part Plaintiff’s Motion for 

Attorney’s Fees, Benefits and Interest was filed by the Court for the above-captioned 

matter on July 5, 2016. Within that decision, the Court ordered the parties to submit to 

the court, by not later than July 27, 2016, a joint proposed form of order. The parties 

are currently trying to resolve the case in its entirety and, if necessary agree upon the 

language to be contained in the joint proposed order.

The Parties previously requested a 14-day extension to do so, until today, 

August 10, 20 16. However, the parties have been diligently trying to resolve the case 

in its entirety and, if still necessary, agree upon the language to be contained in the 

joint proposed order. The parties estimate that one more week is necessary to reach a 

potential agreement and accordingly request a further extension through August 17, 

2016 in order to file the joint proposed order. 

A two week extension of time was previously requested on July 27, 2016. No 

parties are prejudiced through an extension of time.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Case 1:12-cv-00130-LJO-SAB Document 97 Filed 08/11/16 Page 2 of 3
LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.

A P R O F E S S I O N A L C O R P O R A T I O N

5 2 0 0 N o r t h P a l m A v e n u e

S u i t e 3 0 2

F r e s n o , C A 9 3 7 0 4 . 2 2 2 5

5 5 9 . 2 4 4 . 7 5 0 0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

FURTHER STIPULATION TO EXTEND 

TIME 2. Case No. 1:12-CV-00130-LJO-DLB

Dated: August 10, 2016 LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.

By: /s/ Keith A. Jacoby

KEITH A. JACOBY

DEMERY RYAN

Attorneys for Defendant

SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 

EDISON COMPANY LONG TERM 

DISABILITY PLAN

Dated: August 10, 2016 ERISA LAW GROUP, LLP

By: /s/ Robert K. Rosanti

THORTON DAVIDSON

ROBERT K. ROSANTI

Attorney for Plaintiff,

WILLIAM BARNETT

Attorneys for Plaintiff WILLIAM 

BARNETT

ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME

GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, pursuant to the Stipulation of the parties, it is 

ordered as follows:

1. A further 7-day extension to submit the joint proposed order is granted. The 

new deadline to file the report is August 17, 2016. 

2. If the parties cannot settle the issues, they shall submit a joint status report on 

or before August 17, 2016, laying out their positions and proposals for further 

proceedings. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 11, 2016 /s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill _____ 

UNITED STATES CHIEF DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:12-cv-00130-LJO-SAB Document 97 Filed 08/11/16 Page 3 of 3