Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-16-01532/USCOURTS-ca4-16-01532-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Maryland Division of Rehabilitative Services
Appellee
Maryland State Department of Education
Appellee
PDG Rehabilitative Services
Appellee
Rise Program
Appellee
Hesman Tall
Appellant
The Partnership Development Group Inc.
Appellee

Document Text:

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-1532

HESMAN TALL,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

THE PARTNERSHIP DEVELOPMENT GROUP INC., (PDG); PDG 

REHABILITATIVE SERVICES; RISE PROGRAM; MARYLAND STATE 

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION; MARYLAND DIVISION OF REHABILITATIVE 

SERVICES,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge. 

(1:15-cv-03352-RDB)

Submitted: October 18, 2016 Decided: October 20, 2016

Before WILKINSON, KING, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Hesman Tall, Appellant Pro Se. Matthew David Gimovsky, WALKER, 

MURPHY & NELSON, LLP, Rockville, Maryland; Elliott L. Schoen, 

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, 

for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 16-1532 Doc: 16 Filed: 10/20/2016 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Hesman Tall appeals the district court’s order dismissing 

his civil action alleging claims under the Americans with 

Disabilities Act and Maryland law. We have reviewed the record 

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the 

reasons stated by the district court. Tall v. The P’ship Dev. 

Grp. Inc., No. 1:15-cv-03352-RDB (D. Md. Apr. 28, 2016). We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Appeal: 16-1532 Doc: 16 Filed: 10/20/2016 Pg: 2 of 2