Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_08-cv-00685/USCOURTS-azd-2_08-cv-00685-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Michael Chertoff
Respondent
Maria Do Nascimento Vincente
Petitioner

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Maria Do Nascimento Vincente, 

Petitioner, 

vs.

Michael Chertoff, 

Respondent. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV 08-0685-PHX-JAT

ORDER

Pending before the Court is Petitioner’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus

(“Petition”) (Doc. #1). The Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation (“R&R”)

(Doc. #14) recommending that the Petition be denied. 

Neither party has filed objections to the R&R. Accordingly, the Court hereby accepts

the R&R. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985) (finding that district courts are not

required to conduct “any review at all . . . of any issue that is not the subject of an objection”

(emphasis added)); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en

banc) (“statute makes it clear that the district judge must review the magistrate judge’s

findings and recommendations de novo if objection is made, but not otherwise” (emphasis

in original)); see also Schmidt v. Johnstone, 263 F.Supp.2d 1219, 1226 (D. Ariz. 2003).

Therefore,

IT IS ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (Doc.

#14) is ACCEPTED;

Case 2:08-cv-00685-JAT Document 15 Filed 12/02/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus

(Doc. #1) is DENIED, without prejudice (in the event the circumstances surrounding

detention change), and

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED.

DATED this 1st day of December, 2008.

Case 2:08-cv-00685-JAT Document 15 Filed 12/02/08 Page 2 of 2