Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-16-01190/USCOURTS-ca4-16-01190-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Julius Nesbitt
Petitioner

Document Text:

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-1190

In Re: JULIUS NESBITT,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. 

(2:08-cr-01153-DCN-1; 2:14-cv-04503-DCN)

Submitted: August 1, 2016 Decided: August 22, 2016

Before AGEE, DIAZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Julius Nesbitt, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 16-1190 Doc: 9 Filed: 08/22/2016 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Julius Nesbitt petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging

that the district court has unduly delayed acting on his 28 

U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. He seeks an order from this court 

directing the district court to act. Our review of the district 

court’s docket reveals that the district court recently took 

significant action on Nesbitt’s 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. 

Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and

deny the mandamus petition. We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented 

in the materials before this court and argument would not aid 

the decisional process. 

PETITION DENIED

Appeal: 16-1190 Doc: 9 Filed: 08/22/2016 Pg: 2 of 2