Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca10-19-01489/USCOURTS-ca10-19-01489-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Popsockets LLC
Appellee
Bradley James Wilcox
Appellant
Lora Suzanne Wilcox
Appellant

Document Text:

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

_________________________________

POPSOCKETS LLC, 

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

LORA SUZANNE WILCOX; BRADLEY 

JAMES WILCOX, 

 Defendants - Appellants.

No. 19-1489

(D.C. No. 1:19-CV-01080-RM-MEH)

(D. Colo.)

_________________________________

ORDER

_________________________________

This appeal was opened on December 31, 2019. By order entered January 2, 2020, 

the court directed the appellants to respond to a challenge to our jurisdiction to consider 

their appeal at this time. See 10th Cir. R. 27.3(B). In the January 2 order, we provided 

two reasons why it appears this court lacks jurisdiction to consider the instant premature 

appeal. We directed the appellants to file a memorandum brief responsive to our 

jurisdictional challenge by January 16, 2020 and warned the appellants that not filing a 

memorandum brief could result in dismissal of the appeal for lack of prosecution. Id.

42.1.

On January 16, 2020, the appellants submitted what appears to be their opening 

brief addressing the merits of the order they attempted to appeal. Because merits briefing 

was expressly suspended by our January 2 order, the court noted our receipt of their 

FILED

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

January 24, 2020

Christopher M. Wolpert

Clerk of Court

Appellate Case: 19-1489 Document: 010110294638 Date Filed: 01/24/2020 Page: 1
2

merits brief but did not file it. The submitted brief does not address either of the two 

appellate jurisdictional concerns raised in our January 2 order.

The time within which the court directed the appellants to respond to the 

jurisdictional challenge has now expired, and the appellants have not submitted any 

additional documents to the court, responsive to the court’s jurisdictional challenge or 

otherwise. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for lack of prosecution pursuant to Tenth 

Circuit Rule 42.1. A copy of this order shall stand as and for the mandate of this court.

Entered for the Court

CHRISTOPHER M. WOLPERT, Clerk

by: Lara Smith

 Counsel to the Clerk

Appellate Case: 19-1489 Document: 010110294638 Date Filed: 01/24/2020 Page: 2