Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-00577/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-00577-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
California Department of Motor Vehicles
Defendant
California Highway Patrol
Defendant
G.L. Fief
Defendant
Greg Makel
Defendant
Mark McAfee
Plaintiff
Salcido
Defendant
State of California
Defendant
G. Verdugo
Defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[Proposed] Order on Motion to Dismiss

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MARK MCAFEE,

Plaintiff,

v.

STATE OF CALIFORNIA, CALIFORNIA

HIGHWAY PATROL, CHP OFFICER GREG

MAKEL, CHP OFFICER SALCIDO, CHP

CAPT. G.L. FIEF, CALIFORNIA

DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES,

HEARING OFFICER G. VERDUGO, and

DOES 1 through 10, inclusive,

Defendants.

1:07-CV-00577-OWW-NEW

ORDER GRANTING

DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO

DISMISS

On July 2, 2007, the motion of defendants State of California by and through the

Department of Motor Vehicles, CHP Officer D. Salcido, CHP Captain G. Fief, and DMV

Hearing Officer G. Verdugo came on for hearing. Defendants were represented at the hearing by

Deputy Attorney General Jeff R. Vincent. Plaintiff was represented by attorney Bruce W.

Nickerson. 

Based on the briefs filed and arguments made at the hearing, the Court grants

defendants' motion based on the grounds stated in defendants' Memorandum of Points and

Authorities in support of the Motion to Dismiss. Plaintiff is granted leave to amend his

Case 1:07-cv-00577-OWW -GSA Document 16 Filed 07/05/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[Proposed] Order on Motion to Dismiss

2

complaint as proposed by plaintiff in his "proposed" Third Amended Complaint, which was

submitted as an exhibit to plaintiff's Opposition to the Motion to Dismiss.

Accordingly, is hereby ordered that plaintiff's First Amended Complaint is dismissed

and plaintiff's proposed Third Amended Complaint is to be filed. Defendants shall file a

responsive pleading within 20 days of the filing of the Third Amended Complaint. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 5, 2007 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger 

emm0d6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:07-cv-00577-OWW -GSA Document 16 Filed 07/05/07 Page 2 of 2