Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_24-cv-03198/USCOURTS-caed-2_24-cv-03198-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Linzi Kaylene Adams
Plaintiff
Commissioner of Social Security
Defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LINZI KAYLENE ADAMS,

Plaintiff,

v.

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL 

SECURITY,

Defendant.

No. 2:24–cv–03198–SCR

ORDER GRANTING IFP AND 

DIRECTING E-SERVICE

Pending before the court is Plaintiff’s motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. See 

28 U.S.C. § 1915 (authorizing the commencement of an action “without prepayment of fees or 

security” by a person that is unable to pay such fees).

1

 ECF No. 2. Plaintiff submitted the 

required affidavit, which demonstrates an inability to prepay fees and costs or give security for 

them. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff’s request to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 2) is GRANTED;

2. The Clerk of Court is directed to issue a summons for this case;

3. In keeping with the Court’s e-service procedure for Social Security cases, service 

on the Defendant Commissioner of Social Security Administration shall proceed 

under the Court’s E-Service program as follows. Once a summons is issued, the 

1 Actions involving review of Social Security decisions are referred to a magistrate judge 

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and E.D. Cal. L.R. 302(c)(15).

Case 2:24-cv-03198-SCR Document 4 Filed 11/26/24 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Clerk of Court shall deliver to the Commissioner of Social Security 

Administration and the United States Attorney’s Office at their designated email 

addresses a notice of electronic filing of the action along with the summons and 

complaint. The Commissioner has agreed not to raise a defense of insufficient 

service of process if provided with notice of a complaint as detailed in this order. 

This order is not intended to prevent parties from making any other motions that 

are appropriate under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; and

4. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to issue a scheduling order in this case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: November 25, 2024

Case 2:24-cv-03198-SCR Document 4 Filed 11/26/24 Page 2 of 2