Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_02-cv-00348/USCOURTS-cand-3_02-cv-00348-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Steven Cambra
Respondent
James Estep
Petitioner

Document Text:

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

 

JAMES ESTEP,

Petitioner, 

 No C-02-0348 VRW

v

 ORDER

STEVEN CAMBRA, Warden, 

 Respondent.

_________________________________/

The court of appeals has remanded this case for the

limited purpose of granting or denying a certificate of

appealability pursuant to 28 USC § 2253(c) and Federal Rule of

Appellate Procedure 22(b). Doc # 24. 

A certificate of appealability is GRANTED because

petitioner has made "a substantial showing of the denial of a

constitutional right." 28 USC § 2253(c)(2). Petitioner has

demonstrated that "jurists of reason would find it debatable

whether the petition states a valid claim of the denial of a

constitutional right and that jurists of reason would find it

Case 3:02-cv-00348-VRW Document 25 Filed 10/27/05 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 2

debatable whether the district court was correct in its procedural

ruling.” Slack v McDaniel, 529 US 473, 484 (2000).

The clerk shall return to the court of appeals the case

file with this order. See United States v Asrar, 116 F3d 1268,

1270 (9th Cir 1997).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

 

VAUGHN R WALKER

United States District Chief Judge

Case 3:02-cv-00348-VRW Document 25 Filed 10/27/05 Page 2 of 2