Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-03323/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-03323-21/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Keun Taek Park
Defendant
Toppan Photomasks, Inc.
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 Case No.: 3:13-cv-03323-MMC 

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED DISMISSAL ORDER 

DANIELLE L. OCHS, CA Bar No. 178677 

danielle.ochs@ogletreedeakins.com 

BECKI D. GRAHAM, CA Bar No. 238010 

becki.graham@ogletreedeakins.com 

OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, P.C. 

Steuart Tower, Suite 1300 

One Market Plaza 

San Francisco, CA 94105 

Telephone: 415.442.4810 

Facsimile: 415.442.4870 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

TOPPAN PHOTOMASKS, INC. 

MARC N. BERNSTEIN, CA Bar No. 145837 

mbernstein@blgrp.com

WILL B. FITTON, CA Bar No. 182818 

wfitton@blgrp.com

THE BUSINESS LITIGATION GROUP. P.C. 

555 Montgomery St., Suite 1650 

San Francisco, CA 94111 

Telephone: 415.765.6633 

Facsimile: 415.283.4804 

Attorneys for Defendant 

KEUN TAEK PARK 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

TOPPAN PHOTOMASKS, INC., 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

KEUN TAEK PARK, an individual, 

Defendant. 

Case No. 3:13-cv-03323-MMC 

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED 

DISMISSAL ORDER 

Complaint Filed: July 15, 2013 

Trial Date: April 20, 2015 

Judge: Hon. Maxine M. Chesney 

Case 3:13-cv-03323-MMC Document 107 Filed 01/08/15 Page 1 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1 Case No.: 3:13-cv-03323-MMC 

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED DISMISSAL ORDER 

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED DISMISSAL ORDER 

WHEREAS, on July 17, 2013, Plaintiff Toppan Photomasks, Inc. (“Plaintiff” or “TPI”) 

filed the above-captioned action (the “Litigation”) against Defendant Keun Taek Park 

(“Defendant” or “Mr. Park”) (collectively, the “Parties”) 

WHEREAS, the Parties now wish to end the litigation, and agreed as a basis for doing so to 

stipulate and agree to the issuance of a permanent injunction (see Doc. No. 104); 

WHEREAS , on December 3, 2014, the Court issued the requested permanent injunction 

(See Doc. No. 105); and 

WHEREAS, the Parties now wish to request that the Court dismiss this action. 

NOW THEREFORE, the Parties stipulate and request the Court to issue the Dismissal in 

the form attached as Exhibit A. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

 

DATED: January 7, 2015 OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & 

STEWART, P.C. 

By: /s/ Danielle Ochs 

DANIELLE L. OCHS 

BECKI D. GRAHAM 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

TOPPAN PHOTOMASKS, INC. 

DATED: January 7, 2015 THE BUSINESS LITIGATION GROUP, P.C. 

By: /s/ Will B. Fitton 

MARC N. BERNSTEIN 

WILL B. FITTON 

Attorneys for Defendant 

KEUN TAEK PARK 

Case 3:13-cv-03323-MMC Document 107 Filed 01/08/15 Page 2 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2 Case No.: 3:13-cv-03323-MMC 

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED DISMISSAL ORDER 

ATTESTATION OF CONCURRENCE IN FILING

In accordance with Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I attest that concurrence in the filing of this 

document has been obtained from Danielle L. Ochs. 

Dated: January 7, 2015 /s/ Will B. Fitton 

MARC N. BERNSTEIN 

WILL B. FITTON 

Attorneys for Defendant 

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Based on the Parties’ stipulation, and for good cause shown, IT IS SO ORDERED. The 

Clerk of the Court is directed to enter the proposed form of judgment attached as Exhibit A as the 

Court’s final judgment in this matter. All other existing dates and deadlines in this matter are 

hereby vacated and this matter is adjudged dismissed. Each party to bear its own fees and costs. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: ___________________, 2015 ___________________________________________ 

 MAXINE M. CHESNEY 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

January 8

order ^

Case 3:13-cv-03323-MMC Document 107 Filed 01/08/15 Page 3 of 3