Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_13-cv-02351/USCOURTS-azd-2_13-cv-02351-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
David Del Grande-Leyva
Petitioner
David Gonzalez
Respondent

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

David Del Grande-Leyva, 

Petitioner, 

vs.

David Gonzalez, United States Marshal for

the District of Arizona, 

Respondent. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV-13-2351-PHX-SRB (DKD)

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

TO THE HONORABLE SUSAN R. BOLTON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE:

On October 15, 2013, Magistrate Judge Bowman issued a provisional arrest warrant,

ordering the arrest of David Del Grande-Leyva pursuant to an extradition agreement between

Mexico and the United States. He was detained pursuant to this warrant, and Magistrate

Judge Rateau ordered Mr. Del Grande’s continued detention pending the extradition hearing

scheduled for January 6, 2014. See 4:13-mj-05682.

On November 15, 2013, Mr. Del Grande filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. In his Petition, he alleged that (1) his provisional arrest was

not appropriate pursuant to the extradition agreement; and (2) there are special circumstances

entitling him to release pending further extradition proceedings (Doc. 1). On December 18,

2013, in his criminal case, the government filed a Motion to Dismiss, because the Republic

of Mexico had notified the government that the Mexican warrant had been quashed and that

Mexico was rescinding their extradition request. On December 19, 2013, Magistrate Judge

Case 2:13-cv-02351-SRB Document 14 Filed 01/07/14 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 - 2 -

Velasco granted the government’s Motion to Dismiss and released Mr. Del Grande. On

January 3, 2014, Mr. Del Grande, through counsel, filed a Motion to Dismiss the Habeas

Petition, contending that the petition is now moot.

IT IS THEREFORE RECOMMENDED that David Del Grande-Leyva’s Motion

to Dismiss be granted (Doc. 13).

IT IS FURTHER RECOMMENDED that his Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus

be dismissed as moot (Doc. 1).

This recommendation is not an order that is immediately appealable to the Ninth

Circuit Court of Appeals. Any notice of appeal pursuant to Rule 4(a)(1), Federal Rules of

Appellate Procedure, should not be filed until entry of the district court’s judgment. The

parties shall have fourteen days from the date of service of a copy of this recommendation

within which to file specific written objections with the Court. See, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1);

Rules 72, 6(a), 6(b), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Thereafter, the parties have fourteen

days within which to file a response to the objections. Failure timely to file objections to the

Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation may result in the acceptance of the Report

and Recommendation by the district court without further review. See United States v.

Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003). Failure timely to file objections to any

factual determinations of the Magistrate Judge will be considered a waiver of a party’s right

to appellate review of the findings of fact in an order or judgment entered pursuant to the

Magistrate Judge’s recommendation. See Rule 72, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

DATED this 7th day of January, 2014.

Case 2:13-cv-02351-SRB Document 14 Filed 01/07/14 Page 2 of 2