Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_98-cr-00844/USCOURTS-azd-2_98-cr-00844-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Marco Montes
Defendant
Marco Montes-Medina
Defendant
United States of America
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

United States of America, 

Plaintiff, 

vs.

Marco Montes-Medina, 

Defendant/Movant. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV-06-0982-PHX-ROS 

 CR-98-0844-PHX-ROS

ORDER

On November 24, 2006, Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Marshall issued a Report and

Recommendation ("R&R") (Doc. #74) recommending that the Court issue an order denying

Movant's Motion to Vacate under 28 U.S.C. 2255 (Doc. #69). No objections were filed by

either party.

The Court "may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or

recommendations made by the magistrate judge." 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). It is "clear that the

district judge must review the magistrate judge's findings and recommendations de novo if

objection is made, but not otherwise." United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121

(9th Cir. 2003) (en banc) (emphasis in original); Schmidt v. Johnstone, 263 F. Supp. 2d 1219,

1126 (D. Ariz. 2003) ("Following Reyna-Tapia, this Court concludes that de novo review of

factual and legal issues is required if objections are made, 'but not otherwise."'). District

courts are not required to conduct "any review at all . . . of any issue that is not the subject

Case 2:98-cr-00844-ROS Document 75 Filed 11/29/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

of an objection." Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985). No objection having been

made, the Court will adopt the R&R in full. 

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 74) is ADOPTED and

Movant's Motion to Vacate under 28 U.S.C. 2255 (Doc. #69) is DENIED.

DATED this 29th day of November, 2006.

Case 2:98-cr-00844-ROS Document 75 Filed 11/29/06 Page 2 of 2