Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_15-cv-00662/USCOURTS-caed-1_15-cv-00662-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Bank of America, N.A.
Defendant
Clear Recon Corp.
Defendant
Stephen Jackson
Plaintiff
Stewart Title
Defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

STEPHEN JACKSON,

Plaintiff,

v.

CLEAR RECON CORP.: BANK OF 

AMERICA, N.A. SUCCESSOR BY 

MERGER TO BAC LOANS SERVICING, 

LP FKA COUNTRYWIDE HOME 

LOANS SERVICING LP; STEWART 

TITLE; and DOES 1-10,

Defendants.

No. 1:15-cv-662 --- BAM

ORDER TRANSFERRING ACTION 

TO SACRAMENTO DIVISION

Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and filed the instant action in the Fresno Division of the 

United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. A review of the complaint 

reveals that Plaintiff resides in Fairfield, California, and the property at issue in the complaint is 

also located in Fairfield, California. Fairfield California is located in Solano County which lies 

within the jurisdictional boundaries of the Sacramento Division of this Court. See Local Rule 

120(d).

Title 28 of the United States Code Section 1391(b) provides :

A civil action wherein jurisdiction is not founded solely on diversity of citizenship may, 

except as otherwise provided by law, be brought only in (1) a judicial district where any 

Case 1:15-cv-00662---BAM Document 2 Filed 05/05/15 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

defendant resides, if all defendants reside in the same State, (2) a judicial district in which 

a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred, or a 

substantial part of property that is the subject of the action is situated, or (3) a judicial 

district in which any defendant may be found, if there is no district in which the action 

may otherwise be brought.

Pursuant to Local Rule 120(f), a Court may transfer an action to another venue within the 

district when the action has not been commenced in the proper court. The court is transferring 

this action to the Sacramento Division of the Eastern District of California because as previously 

noted, Plaintiff resides there and because the property at issue in the complaint is located in 

Solano County. See 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(1). Moreover, it appears that the actions giving rise to 

Plaintiff’s complaint all arose in Solano County. See 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2). Good cause 

appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this entire matter is TRANSFERRED to the 

Sacramento Division of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 4, 2015 /s/ Barbara A. McAuliffe _

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:15-cv-00662---BAM Document 2 Filed 05/05/15 Page 2 of 2