Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01330/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01330-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Alison Stirm
Plaintiff
United States of America
Defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ALISON STIRM,

Plaintiff,

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Defendant.

No. 2:22-cv-01330-CKD

ORDER

Defendant has answered the complaint. (ECF No. 6.) Within 30 days from the date of this 

order, if they have not already done so, the parties shall meet, in person or by telephone, as 

required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26. Within 7 days after the parties’ Rule 26 

discussion, the parties shall file a Joint Status Report1 and Request for Hearing before the 

Magistrate Judge for the purpose of entry of a pretrial scheduling order. The joint status report 

shall address the relevant portions of Local Rule 240(a).

In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:

1. Within 30 days from the date of this order, the parties shall meet, in person or by 

telephone, as required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26.

////

1 If the parties are unable to file a joint status report, they may file separate status reports.

Case 2:22-cv-01330-CKD Document 10 Filed 11/04/22 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

2. Within 7 days after the parties’ Rule 26 discussion, the parties shall file a joint status 

report and request for hearing before the Magistrate Judge for the purpose of entry of a pretrial 

scheduling order. The report shall address the following matters:

a. Service of process;

b. Possible joinder of additional parties;

c. Any expected or desired amendment of the pleadings;

d. Jurisdiction and venue;

e. Anticipated motions and their scheduling;

f. The report required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26 outlining the 

proposed discovery plan and its scheduling, including disclosure of expert witnesses;

g. Future proceedings, including setting appropriate cut−off dates for discovery 

and law and motion, and the scheduling of a pretrial conference and trial;

h. Special procedures, if any;

i. Estimated trial time;

j. Modification of standard pretrial procedures specified by the rules due to the

simplicity or complexity of the proceedings;

k. Whether the case is related to any other cases, including bankruptcy;

l. Whether a settlement conference should be scheduled;

m. The parties’ positions with respect to Voluntary Dispute Resolution (VDRP) 

under Local Rule 271(d); and

n. Any other matters that may add to the just and expeditious disposition of this 

matter.

Dated: November 4, 2022

8.Stirm22cv1330.isc

_____________________________________

CAROLYN K. DELANEY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:22-cv-01330-CKD Document 10 Filed 11/04/22 Page 2 of 2