Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-01015/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-01015-2/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Sean Geddes
Defendant
Michael Vigil
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MICHAEL VIGIL, 

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-06-1015 RRB DAD PS

vs.

SEAN GEDDES,

Defendant. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed the above-entitled action. The matter was referred

to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 72-302(c)(21).

On September 14, 2006, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations

herein which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to

the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Plaintiff has not filed

objections to the findings and recommendations.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be

supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY

ORDERED that:

/////

/////

Case 2:06-cv-01015-RRB-DAD Document 6 Filed 11/20/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

1. The findings and recommendations filed September 14, 2006, are adopted in full;

and

2. This action is dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.

ENTERED this 19th day of November, 2007.

S/RALPH R. BEISTLINE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-01015-RRB-DAD Document 6 Filed 11/20/07 Page 2 of 2