Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca5-13-51040/USCOURTS-ca5-13-51040-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Ernest Lee McCarty
Appellant
United States of America
Appellee

Document Text:

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-51040

c/w No. 13-51136

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

ERNEST LEE MCCARTY,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeals from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 7:13-CR-50-6

USDC No. 7:13-CR-148-1

Before KING, CLEMENT, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Ernest Lee McCarty has moved for 

leave to withdraw and has filed briefs in accordance with Anders v. California, 

386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). 

McCarty has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s briefs and the 

relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as McCarty’s response. 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

July 17, 2015

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 13-51040 Document: 00513120055 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/17/2015
No. 13-51040

c/w No. 13-51136

2

We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeals present no nonfrivolous 

issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motions for leave to 

withdraw are GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities 

herein, and the APPEALS ARE DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 13-51040 Document: 00513120055 Page: 2 Date Filed: 07/17/2015