Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_13-cv-01940/USCOURTS-caed-1_13-cv-01940-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Cecil Hamilton
Plaintiff
Dianne Hamilton
Plaintiff
United States of America
Defendant

Document Text:

1 STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

30

31

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

ALYSON A. BERG

Assistant United States Attorney

2500 Tulare Street, Suite 4401

Fresno, CA 93721

Telephone: (559) 497-4000

Facsimile: (559) 497-4099

Attorneys for Defendant

UNITED STATES

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CECIL HAMILTON and DIANNE 

HAMILTON, Individually and as Successors, 

DAMGES FOR In Interest, ESTATE OF 

WILLIAM E. HAMILTON, Decedent,

 Plaintiffs,

 v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Defendant.

CASE NO. 1:13-CV-01940 LJO-MJS

STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING 

SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT AND 

SCHEDULING CONFERENCE 

Plaintiffs Cecil Hamilton and Dianne Hamilton, individually, and as Successors, Damages for in 

Interest, Estate of William E. Hamilton, Decedent (“Plaintiffs”), and Defendant United States (“United 

States”), stipulate, by and through the undersigned counsel, to allow Plaintiffs file a Second Amended 

Complaint on or before August 11, 2014, and that the United States will have thirty (30) days from the 

filing of the Second Amended Complaint to file its response. The parties also jointly request that the 

Court continue the Scheduling Conference currently set for August 7, 2014 at 10:30 a.m. to October 30, 

2014, at 11 a.m.

The parties base this stipulation on good cause, which includes the need for Plaintiffs to remove 

the Estate as a party to the action and clarify their allegations and then allow the sufficient time for the 

United States to review the allegations in the Second Amended Complaint and respond accordingly. 

Case 1:13-cv-01940-LJO-MJS Document 17 Filed 07/31/14 Page 1 of 3
2 STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

30

31

Because an operative pleading will not be on file at that date of the current Scheduling Conference, good 

cause exists for a brief continuance of the Scheduling Conference to October 30, 2014, at 11 a.m. 

Dated: July 30, 2014

By:

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

/s/ Alyson A. Berg

ALYSON A. BERG

Assistant United States Attorney

Attorney for Defendant UNITED STATES

Dated: July 30, 2014

 Law Office of David C. Anderson

 By: /s/ David C. Anderson_____________________

 DAVID C. ANDERSON

 Attorney for Plaintiffs

ORDER

For good cause showing, IT IS HEREBY ORERED that:

1. Plaintiffs shall file a Second Amended Complaint on or before August 11, 2014;

2. The United States shall have thirty (30) days from the filing of the Second Amended 

Complaint to file its response. 

3. The Scheduling Conference currently set for August 7, 2014 at 10:30 a.m., shall be 

continued to October 30, 2014 at 11 a.m.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 30, 2014 /s/Michael J. Seng 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:13-cv-01940-LJO-MJS Document 17 Filed 07/31/14 Page 2 of 3
3 STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

30

31

Case 1:13-cv-01940-LJO-MJS Document 17 Filed 07/31/14 Page 3 of 3