Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-02260/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-02260-2/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
California State University
Defendant
Mihretu Bulti Dasisa
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MIHRETU BULTI DASISA,

Plaintiff, 2:05-cv-2260-GEB-KJM-PS

vs.

CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY,

Defendant. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed the above-entitled actions. The matter was

referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 72-302(c)(21).

On June 20, 2006, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations

herein which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections

to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within ten days. Plaintiff has not filed

objections to the findings and recommendations.

/////

/////

/////

/////

/////

Case 2:05-cv-02260-GEB -KJM Document 13 Filed 07/24/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be

supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY

ORDERED that: 

1. The findings and recommendations filed June 20, 2006, are adopted in full;

and

2. This action is dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 11-110; Fed. R.

Civ. P. 41(b). 

Dated: July 24, 2006

/s/ Garland E. Burrell, Jr.

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.

United States District Judge

Case 2:05-cv-02260-GEB -KJM Document 13 Filed 07/24/06 Page 2 of 2