Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-19-01922/USCOURTS-ca4-19-01922-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Franklin C. Smith
Petitioner

Document Text:

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-1922

In re: FRANKLIN C. SMITH,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.

Submitted: December 16, 2019 Decided: January 3, 2020

Before KING and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit 

Judge.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Franklin C. Smith, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 19-1922 Doc: 4 Filed: 01/03/2020 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Franklin C. Smith petitions for a writ of mandamus concerning receipt of his 

disability benefits. We conclude that Smith is not entitled to mandamus relief.

Mandamus relief is a drastic remedy and should be used only in extraordinary 

circumstances. Kerr v. U.S. Dist. Court, 426 U.S. 394, 402 (1976); United States v. 

Moussaoui, 333 F.3d 509, 516-17 (4th Cir. 2003). Further, mandamus relief is available 

only when the petitioner has a clear right to the relief sought. In re Murphy-Brown, LLC, 

907 F.3d 788, 795 (4th Cir. 2018).

The relief sought by Smith is not available by way of mandamus. Accordingly, we 

deny the petition for writ of mandamus. We dispense with oral argument because the facts 

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

USCA4 Appeal: 19-1922 Doc: 4 Filed: 01/03/2020 Pg: 2 of 2