Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_18-cv-02145/USCOURTS-caed-2_18-cv-02145-4/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
California Medical Facility
Defendant
Scott Jones
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SCOTT JONES, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

CALIFORNIA MEDICAL FACILITY, et 

al., 

Defendants. 

No. 2:18-cv-2145 AC P 

ORDER and 

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 

 This prisoner civil rights action, filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, is referred to the 

undersigned pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302(c). By order filed 

December 20, 2019, this court dismissed plaintiff’s complaint with leave to file an amended 

complaint within thirty days. ECF No. 13. The court informed plaintiff that failure to timely file 

an amended complaint would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed without 

prejudice. Id. at 11. 

 More than thirty days have passed since service of the court’s order. Plaintiff has not filed 

an amended complaint or otherwise communicated with the court, indicating that plaintiff appears 

to have abandoned this case. 

//// 

Case 2:18-cv-02145-JAM-AC Document 17 Filed 02/04/20 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2 

 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of Court is directed to randomly 

assign a district judge to this action. 

 Further, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without 

prejudice for lack of prosecution. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). 

 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen (14) 

days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written 

objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned 

“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that 

failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District 

Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 

DATED: February 4, 2020 

Case 2:18-cv-02145-JAM-AC Document 17 Filed 02/04/20 Page 2 of 2