Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_06-cv-07729/USCOURTS-cand-4_06-cv-07729-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Edward James Dryg
Petitioner
Sheila E. Mitchell
Respondent

Document Text:

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

EDWARD JAMES DRYG,

Petitioner, No. C 06-7729 PJH

v. ORDER RE: SERVICE AND RESPONSE

SHEILA E. MITCHELL, Chief, Santa

Clara County Probation Department,

Respondent.

_______________________________/

On December 18, 2006, petitioner Edward James Dryg, who is presently on formal

supervised probation following a judgment of conviction in the Superior Court of California,

County of Santa Clara, filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §

2254. On January 18, 2007, the court issued a lengthy order to show cause, directing Dryg

to demonstrate why his petition should not be dismissed as unexhausted. Dryg filed a

response on February 2, 2007.

This court’s order to show cause inadvertently failed to order service of the petition

and order to show cause on respondent. Accordingly, respondent has yet to appear in the

case. Because the court determines that respondent is entitled to respond to Dryg’s

arguments regarding exhaustion of his claim(s), the following is ORDERED:

1. The clerk shall serve by certified mail: (1) a copy of this order; (2) the petition

and all attachments thereto; and (3) a copy of this court’s January 18, 2007 order to show

cause upon respondents. Dryg is ORDERED to serve a copy of his February 2, 2007

Case 4:06-cv-07729-PJH Document 4 Filed 02/23/07 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

response on respondent immediately upon receipt of this order.

2. Respondent shall file with this court and serve on petitioner within 30 days of 

date of this order a response to petitioner’s supplemental brief regarding exhaustion. 

3. Petitioner may file and serve a reply, if any, within 14 days of the response.

Dated: February 23, 2007

IT IS SO ORDERED.

__________________________________

PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON

United States District Judge 

Case 4:06-cv-07729-PJH Document 4 Filed 02/23/07 Page 2 of 2