Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_13-cv-01368/USCOURTS-caed-2_13-cv-01368-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
County of Yolo
Defendant
Robin Gonzalez
Plaintiff
Edward G. Prieto
Defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

VICTORIA ZETWICK,

Plaintiff,

v.

COUNTY OF YOLO; EDWARD G. 

PRIETO, DOES 1 through 10, inclusive,

Defendants.

No. 2:12-cv-02486-TLN-AC 

ORDER

ROBIN GONZALEZ,

Plaintiff,

v.

COUNTY OF YOLO; EDWARD G. 

PRIETO, an individual; DOES 1 through 

20, inclusive,

Defendants.

No. 2:13-cv-01368-KJM-AC

The undersigned judge declines to relate the above-captioned cases pursuant to Local Rule 

123. Assignment of the matters to the same judge is not likely to effect a substantial savings of 

judicial effort or other economies. These actions involve the same or similar defendants, but the 

actions involve different plaintiffs, there are facts unique to each case, it is not clear that the same 

result should follow in these actions, and assignment to different judges would not entail 

Case 2:13-cv-01368-KJM-AC Document 15 Filed 12/10/13 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

substantial duplication of labor. Therefore, 2:13-cv-01368-KJM-AC shall not be reassigned to 

the undersigned judge.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: December 6, 2013

Case 2:13-cv-01368-KJM-AC Document 15 Filed 12/10/13 Page 2 of 2