Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-00671/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-00671-3/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
California Medical Facility
Defendant
Clete Reo Hart
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CLETE REO HART,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-05-0671 LKK GGH P

vs.

DIRECTOR OF HUMAN RESOURCES

CALIFORNIA MEDICAL FACILITY, et al.,

Defendants. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

By order filed April 18, 2006, the court granted plaintiff thirty days to file a

second amended complaint. In the April 18th order, the court informed plaintiff of the

deficiencies in his amended complaint. The thirty day period has now expired, and plaintiff has

not filed a second amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court’s order.

For the reasons given in the April 18, 2006, order, IT IS HEREBY

RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 11-110; Fed.

R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of Title 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within

twenty days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file

Case 2:05-cv-00671-LKK -GGH Document 15 Filed 07/12/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

written objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate 

Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections

within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. 

DATED: 7/12/06

/s/ Gregory G. Hollows

 

GREGORY G. HOLLOWS

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

GGH:035

hart0671.fta

Case 2:05-cv-00671-LKK -GGH Document 15 Filed 07/12/06 Page 2 of 2