Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-00789/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-00789-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Board of Trustees of the Industrial Carpenters and Precast Pension Fund
Defendant
Restated Pension Plan For The Industrial Carpenters and Precast Pension Trust Fund
Defendant
Kelvin Wayne
Plaintiff

Document Text:

Stipulation to Extend Deadline for Defendants to Answer Complaint (Case No. C 07-00789 (CRB)) 

WEINBERG, ROGER & 

ROSENFELD 

A Professional Corporation 

1001 Marina Village Parkway 

Suite 200 

Alameda, CA 94501-1091 

510.337.1001

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

BARRY E. HINKLE, Bar No. 071223 

LINDA BALDWIN JONES, Bar No. 178922 

NICOLE M. PHILLIPS, Bar No. 203786 

WEINBERG, ROGER & ROSENFELD 

A Professional Corporation 

1001 Marina Village Parkway, Suite 200 

Alameda, California 94501-1091 

Telephone 510.337.1001 

Fax 510.337.1023 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

KELVIN WAYNE, 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

RESTATED PENSION PLAN FOR THE 

INDUSTRIAL CARPENTERS AND 

PRECAST PENSION TRUST FUND, and 

BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE 

INDUSTRIAL CARPENTERS AND 

PRECAST PENSION FUND 

 Defendants. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. C07-00789 (CRB) 

STIPULATION TO EXTEND 

DEADLINE FOR DEFENDANT TO 

ANSWER COMPLAINT 

Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12, and Local Rule 6-1(a), Plaintiff and 

Defendants hereby stipulate to extend the time within which Defendants have to answer or 

otherwise respond to the Complaint. 

Plaintiff filed the Complaint in this action on or around February 7, 2007, and Defendants 

were served with the Complaint and Summons on or around February 12, 2007. With this 

stipulation, Defendants’ deadline for answering and or otherwise responding to the Complaint is 

extended from to March 30, 2007. 

The parties also agree that pursuant to Local Rule 6-1(a), this stipulation is respectfully 

submitted to the Court for approval without the necessity of a hearing. 

The reason for time extension is that the parties hope to settle this matter. If the parties are 

Case 3:07-cv-00789-CRB Document 5 Filed 03/23/07 Page 1 of 2
 - 2 - 

Stipulation to Extend Deadline for Defendants to Answer Complaint (Case No. C 07-00789 (CRB)) 

WEINBERG, ROGER & 

ROSENFELD 

A Professional Corporation 

1001 Marina Village Parkway 

Suite 200 

Alameda, CA 94501-1091 

510.337.1001

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

able to reach a settlement, dismissal papers will be submit before this Court. 

Dated: March 20, 2007 

WEINBERG, ROGER & ROSENFELD 

A Professional Corporation 

By: /s/ Nicole M. Phillips 

 NICOLE M. PHILLIPS, 

 Attorneys for Denfendants 

Dated: March 20, 2007 

LEWIS, FEINBERG, LEE, RENAKER & JACKSON, 

P.C. 

By: /s/ Lindsay E. Nako 

 LINDSAY E. NAKO, 

 Attorneys for Plaintiff 

115427/452010 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Charles R. Breyer

March 23, 2007

Case 3:07-cv-00789-CRB Document 5 Filed 03/23/07 Page 2 of 2