Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-05409/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-05409-2/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
ADS-1
Plaintiff
Advertising Display Systems
Plaintiff
CBS Corporation
Defendant
Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc.
Defendant
Kevin Hicks
Plaintiff
William Hooper
Defendant
Raymond Reudy
Plaintiff
Patrick Roche
Defendant

Document Text:

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RAYMOND REUDY, and KEVIN HICKS dba

ADVERTISING DISPLAY SYSTEMS, and

ADS-1, a California limited

liability company,

Plaintiffs,

v.

CLEAR CHANNEL OUTDOOR, INC., a

Delaware corporation, WILLIAM

HOOPER, an individual, CBS

CORPORATION, a Delaware

corporation, PATRICK ROCHE, an

individual and DOES 1-50, 

Defendants. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. C-06-5409 SC

FINAL JUDGMENT

The Court, having read and reviewed the reports, findings and

recommendations of the Special Master, with regard to the two

recommendations dated December 4, 2007, hereby accepts the said

recommendations and hereby ORDERS entry of final judgment in favor

of CBS Corporation, Patrick Roche, Clear Channel, Inc., and/or

William Hooper, and that ADS take nothing from Defendants CBS and

Patrick Roche, all causes of action against CBS and Patrick Roche

be dismissed with prejudice.

It is further ORDERED that CBS Corporation and Patrick Roche

shall have and recover their costs and disbursements in an amount

Case 3:06-cv-05409-SC Document 54 Filed 12/11/07 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 2

to be presented to the Special Master for approval, with notice to

Plaintiffs.

It is further ORDERED that this action be dismissed with

prejudice as to all causes of action.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: December 11, 2007

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:06-cv-05409-SC Document 54 Filed 12/11/07 Page 2 of 2