Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca11-15-11140/USCOURTS-ca11-15-11140-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Eugene Antonio Govan
Appellant
United States of America
Appellee

Document Text:

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 15-11140

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D.C. Docket No. 6:14-cr-00119-RBD-DAB-1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

EUGENE ANTONIO GOVAN, 

 Defendant - Appellant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Florida

________________________

(December 9, 2015)

Before WILLIAM PRYOR, JILL PRYOR and FAY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: 

Tom Dale, appointed counsel for Eugene Govan in this direct criminal 

appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of Mr. Govan and 

USCA11 Case: 15-11140 Date Filed: 12/09/2015 Page: 1 of 2
2

prepared a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our 

independent review of the record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative 

merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire 

record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is 

GRANTED, and Mr. Govan’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED. Because 

the final judgment incorrectly listed the offense of conviction as 18 U.S.C. 

§§ 922(g)(1), 924(e)(4)—and because § 924 subsection (e)(4) does not exist—we 

VACATE and REMAND for the limited purpose of correcting this clerical error.

USCA11 Case: 15-11140 Date Filed: 12/09/2015 Page: 2 of 2