Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca5-13-40554/USCOURTS-ca5-13-40554-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Aloecorp, Incorporated
Appellee
Damken, L.L.C.
Appellant

Document Text:

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-40554

Summary Calendar

ALOECORP, INCORPORATED,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

DAMKEN, L.L.C.,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 7:11-CV-86

Before WIENER, OWEN, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Defendant-Appellant Damken, L.L.C. appeals the judgment of the 

district court implementing the jury’s award of damages for breach of the 

construction contract between Damken and Plaintiff-Appellee Aloecorp, 

Incorporated. Our review of the record brought forward on appeal, in light of 

the applicable law as reflected in the appellate briefs of the parties, satisfies 

us that Damken’s claims, including that the district court abused its discretion 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

January 6, 2014

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 

 Case: 13-40554 Document: 00512490088 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/06/2014
No. 13-40554

(1) by denying Damken’s motion for partial judgment on the pleadings and for 

judgment as a matter of law for anticipatory breach, early termination, and 

repudiation of a construction contract at issue, and (2) by refusing to submit 

the issue of restitution to the jury, are not sustained by the facts or the law. In 

sum, we perceive no reversible error and therefor affirm the district court’s 

award of damages, attorney’s fees and costs, court costs, and post-judgment 

interest.

AFFIRMED.

2

 Case: 13-40554 Document: 00512490088 Page: 2 Date Filed: 01/06/2014