Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-16-02053/USCOURTS-ca4-16-02053-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Lindawagner.com
Appellee
Linda L. Wagner
Appellant

Document Text:

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-2053

LINDA L. WAGNER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

LINDAWAGNER.COM, an Internet domain name,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, 

District Judge. (1:16-cv-00053-LMB-IDD)

Submitted: February 28, 2017 Decided: March 15, 2017

Before DUNCAN and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Linda L. Wagner, Appellant Pro Se. Attison Leonard Barnes, III, 

Ari Scott Meltzer, David Edison Weslow, WILEY REIN, LLP, 

Washington, D.C., for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 16-2053 Doc: 14 Filed: 03/15/2017 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Linda L. Wagner appeals the district court’s orders

granting summary judgment in favor of the Internet domain name 

Lindawagner.com and denying reconsideration in Wagner’s in rem 

action under the Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act, 15 

U.S.C. § 1125(d) (2012). We have reviewed the record and the 

parties’ arguments and find no reversible error. Accordingly, 

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. 

Wagner v. Lindawagner.com, No. 1:16-cv-00053-LMB-IDD (E.D. Va. 

Aug. 15, 2016; Aug. 19, 2016). We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented 

in the materials before this court and argument would not aid 

the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Appeal: 16-2053 Doc: 14 Filed: 03/15/2017 Pg: 2 of 2