Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-15-02194/USCOURTS-ca4-15-02194-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Enhanced Recovery Company, LLC
Appellee
Don Bradley Wallace
Appellant

Document Text:

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-2194

DON BRADLEY WALLACE,

 Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

ENHANCED RECOVERY COMPANY, LLC,

 Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. Louise W. Flanagan, 

District Judge. (7:13-cv-00124-FL)

Submitted: April 28, 2016 Decided: June 21, 2016

Before NIEMEYER and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Don Bradley Wallace, Appellant Pro Se. Scott Stephen Gallagher, 

SMITH, GAMBRELL & RUSSELL, LLP, Jacksonville, Florida, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 15-2194 Doc: 39 Filed: 06/21/2016 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Don Bradley Wallace appeals the district court’s order 

denying relief on his complaint asserting claims under the 

Telephone Consumer Protect Act, 47 U.S.C. § 227 (2012).* We have 

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. See Schatz v. 

Rosenberg, 943 F.2d 485, 487 n.1 (4th Cir. 1991) (“We must 

review the district court’s decision on the same record as that 

before the district court.”). Accordingly, we affirm the 

district court’s order, deny Wallace’s motions to supplement the 

record on appeal, to seal some of those documents, and to 

clarify, and deny the Appellee’s motion to strike portions of 

Wallace’s opening brief. We dispense with oral argument because 

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid in the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

 * Wallace abandoned in the district court the remaining 

claims asserted in the complaint. 

Appeal: 15-2194 Doc: 39 Filed: 06/21/2016 Pg: 2 of 2