Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-02732/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-02732-21/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Panoptx, Inc.
Counter-claimant
Protective Optics, Inc.
Counter-defendant

Document Text:

_______________________________________________________________________________ STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER MODIFYING SCHEDULE 

FOR EXPERT DISCLOSURES AND REPORTS 

CASE NO.: C05-02732 CRB 

1

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

KENNETH E. KELLER (SBN: 71450) kkeller@kksrr.com

MICHAEL D. LISI (SBN 196974) mlisi@kksrr.com

KRIEG, KELLER, SLOAN, REILLEY & ROMAN LLP

114 Sansome Street, 4th Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94104 

Telephone: (415) 249-8330 

Facsimile: (415) 249-8333 

Attorneys for Defendant and 

Cross-Complainant PANOPTX, INC. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

PROTECTIVE OPTICS, INC., a California 

corporation, 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

PANOPTX, INC., a California corporation, 

 Defendants. 

 Case No.: C05-02732 CRB (EDL) 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER MODIFYING SCHEDULE FOR 

EXPERT DISCLOSURES AND REPORTS 

AND RELATED CROSS-ACTION 

Case 3:05-cv-02732-CRB Document 184 Filed 05/29/07 Page 1 of 3
_______________________________________________________________________________ STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER MODIFYING SCHEDULE 

FOR EXPERT DISCLOSURES AND REPORTS 

CASE NO.: C05-02732 CRB 

2

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Plaintiff and Counterclaim-Defendant Protective Optics, Inc. (“Protective Optics”) and 

Defendant and Counterclaimant Panoptx, Inc. (“Panoptx”), by and through their undersigned 

counsel, state and agree as follows: 

WHEREAS, the parties have previously stipulated that with respect to those issues on which 

the party has the burden of proof, expert disclosures and reports would be due on May 8, 2007, 

responsive reports would be due on June 7, 2007, and the parties would simultaneously exchange 

rebuttal reports on June 21, 2007; 

WHEREAS the parties further stipulated that, in light of the illness of Protective Optics’ 

industry expert Kenneth Frederick, the parties would modify that schedule to permit Protective 

Optics to disclose an industry expert and to serve a corresponding report relating to trade secret 

misappropriation, willful infringement, secondary considerations of non-obviousness and market 

definition in this action by no later than June 7, 2007, and that Defendant Panoptx would have fortyfive (45) days from June 7, 2007 (until July 22) to disclose a corresponding industry expert and 

serve a report in rebuttal to the opinions offered by Protective Optics’ industry expert; 

WHEREAS, because of the scheduling of various depositions, the parties have further agreed 

to extend by fifteen days the deadlines for the submissions of the remaining expert reports such that 

responsive expert reports and Protective Optics’ industry expert report will be due no later than June 

22, 2007; the parties will simultaneously exchange rebuttal reports on July 6, 2007; and Panoptx’s 

rebuttal report in response to Protective Optics’ industry expert’s report will be due no later than 

August 6, 2007; 

THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by the parties to this action, 

by and through their respective counsel of record, and subject to the approval of the Court, that the 

deadlines for the submissions of responsive expert reports and Protective Optics’ industry expert 

report is extended until June 22, 2007; the deadline for the parties’ simultaneous exchange of expert 

rebuttal reports is extended until July 6, 2007; and that the deadline for Panoptx to disclose an expert 

and serve a corresponding report in rebuttal of Protective Optics’ industry expert’s report is 

extended until August 6, 2007. 

Case 3:05-cv-02732-CRB Document 184 Filed 05/29/07 Page 2 of 3
_______________________________________________________________________________ STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER MODIFYING SCHEDULE 

FOR EXPERT DISCLOSURES AND REPORTS 

CASE NO.: C05-02732 CRB 

3

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

Dated: May 25, 2007 KRIEG, KELLER, SLOAN, REILLEY & ROMAN LLP 

 By: ____________________/s/_______________________ 

MICHAEL D. LISI 

Attorneys for Defendant and Cross-Complainant 

PANOPTX, INC. 

Dated: May 25, 2007 GREENBERG TRAURIG LLP 

 By: __________________/s/_________________________ 

DANIEL T. McCLOSKEY 

Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterclaim-Defendant 

PROTECTIVE OPTICS, INC. 

I hereby attest that I have been authorized by Daniel T. McCloskey to execute on his behalf 

this Stipulation to Modify the Schedule for Expert Disclosures and Reports. 

Executed on this 25th day of May, 2007 at San Francisco, California. 

 By: __________________/s/_________________________ 

MICHAEL D. LISI 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: __________________ ____________________________________________ 

 THE HONORABLE JUDGE CHARLES R. BREYER 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 

80115v2 

May 29, 2007

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Charles R. Breyer

Case 3:05-cv-02732-CRB Document 184 Filed 05/29/07 Page 3 of 3