Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_24-cv-01276/USCOURTS-caed-1_24-cv-01276-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Anhui Kangfubao E-Commerce Co., Ltd.
Defendant
Robert Joseph Marquez
Plaintiff
PDD Holdings, Inc.
Defendant
Pinduoduo, Inc.
Defendant
Temu.com
Defendant
Whaleco Inc.
Defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ROBERT JOSEPH MARQUEZ, an individual,

Plaintiff,

v.

TEMU.COM, a Delaware Corporation; PDD 

HOLDINGS, INC., f/k/a PINDUODUO, INC., 

a Delaware Corporation; WHALECO INC., a 

Delaware Corporation; ANHUI 

KANGFUBAO E-COMMERCE CO., LTD., 

business entity, form unknown; and DOES 1-

100, inclusive,

Defendants.

CASE NO. 1:24-CV-01276-SKO

STIPULATION AND ORDER 

DISMISSING TEMU.COM

(Doc. 8)

On November 20, 2024, the parties filed a Joint Stipulation of Dismissal without Prejudice 

as to Defendant Temu.com, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a). (Doc. 8.)

In relevant part, Rule 41(a)(1)(A) provides as follows:

[A] plaintiff may dismiss an action without a court order by filing: (i) a notice of 

dismissal before the opposing party serves either an answer or a motion for 

summary judgment; or (ii) a stipulation of dismissal signed by all parties who have 

appeared.

Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A). “The plaintiff may dismiss some or all of the defendants, or some or 

all of his claims, through a Rule 41(a)(1) notice,” and the dismissal “automatically terminates the 

action as to the defendants who are the subjects of the notice.” Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 

F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997).

Case 1:24-cv-01276-SKO Document 9 Filed 11/25/24 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Because the parties filed a stipulation of dismissal with prejudice under Rule 41(a), this case 

has automatically terminated as to Defendant Temu.com. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A). 

Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is directed to TERMINATE Defendant Temu.com.

This case shall remain OPEN pending resolution of Plaintiffs’ case against the remaining 

defendant.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: November 22, 2024 /s/ Sheila K. Oberto .

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:24-cv-01276-SKO Document 9 Filed 11/25/24 Page 2 of 2