Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-00489/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-00489-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Michele T. Cable
Plaintiff
Scott W. Cable
Plaintiff
Stewart Title Guaranty Company
Defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-1-

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: DISMISSAL 

K. Greg Peterson, Esq. (SBN: 118287)

James A. Clinchard, Esq. (SBN: 200746) 

LAW OFFICES OF K. GREG PETERSON

P. O. Box 254451

Sacramento, California 95865

Telephone: (916) 443-3010

Facsimile: (916) 492-2680

E-Mail: greg@kgregpeterson.com

jim@kgregpeterson.com

Attorney for Plaintiffs, SCOTT W. CABLE, MICHELE T. CABLE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SCOTT W. CABLE; MICHELE T. CABLE,

Plaintiffs,

v.

STEWART TITLE GUARANTY COMPANY,

a Texas corporation and Does 1 through 10,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO.: 2:05-CV-00489 WBS DAD

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]

ORDER RE: DISMISSAL

Plaintiffs, SCOTT W. CABLE and MICHELE T. CABLE, and defendant, STEWART

TITLE GUARANTY COMPANY, through their respective counsel, K. Greg Peterson, Esq. and

Thomas E. Alborg, Esq., herewith stipulate to dismiss this action pursuant to the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(ii) as follows:

1. Plaintiffs are SCOTT W. CABLE and MICHELE T. CABLE; defendant is

STEWART TITLE GUARANTY COMPANY, a Texas corporation.

2. On January 20, 2005, plaintiff sued defendant in Sacramento County Superior

Court, case No.05AS00244.

3. On February 8, 2005, plaintiff filed a First Amended Complaint in Sacramento

County Superior Court, case No.05AS00244.

4. On March 9, 2005, defendant answered the First Amended Complaint in

Sacramento County Superior Court, case No.05AS00244.

Case 2:05-cv-00489-WBS-DAD Document 16 Filed 08/29/05 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-2-

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: DISMISSAL 

5. On March 14, 2005, Sacramento County Superior Court case No.05AS00244 was

removed by defendant to the above-entitled court.

6. The parties have reached an agreement to settle this action on mutually acceptable

terms. Among other things, both parties have agreed to bear their own attorney’s fees and costs.

7. Plaintiffs move to dismiss the suit.

8. Defendant agrees to the dismissal.

9. This case is not a class action.

10. A receiver has not been appointed in this action.

11. Plaintiffs have not dismissed an action based on or including the same claims as

those presented in this suit.

12. This dismissal is with prejudice.

IT IS HEREBY SO AGREED:

Dated: August ____, 2005 LAW OFFICES OF K. GREG PETERSON

By: 

K. Greg Peterson, Esq., attorney for

Plaintiffs, SCOTT W. CABLE and Michele T.

CABLE 

Dated: August ____, 2005 ALBORG, VEILUVA & EPSTEIN

By: 

Thomas E. Alborg, Esq., attorney for

Defendant, STEWART TITLE GUARANTY

COMPANY 

Case 2:05-cv-00489-WBS-DAD Document 16 Filed 08/29/05 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-3-

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: DISMISSAL 

ORDER

Based upon the foregoing stipulation of the parties, and for good cause shown, the Court

hereby grants the request to dismiss the case with prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED:

Dated: August 26, 2005

Case 2:05-cv-00489-WBS-DAD Document 16 Filed 08/29/05 Page 3 of 3