Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca5-14-10769/USCOURTS-ca5-14-10769-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Eric Rashad Jones
Appellant
United States of America
Appellee

Document Text:

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-10769

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

ERIC RASHAD JONES,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:12-CR-165-1

Before DAVIS, JONES, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Eric Rashad Jones

has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with 

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 

229 (5th Cir. 2011). Jones has not filed a response.

During the pendency of this appeal, Jones completed the six-month 

sentence imposed upon revocation of supervised release and was released from 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

June 16, 2015

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 14-10769 Document: 00513079870 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/16/2015
No. 14-10769

2

custody. Because no additional term of supervised release was imposed, the 

instant appeal is moot. See Spencer v. Kemna, 523 U.S. 1, 7 (1998); United 

States v. Clark, 193 F.3d 845, 847-48 (5th Cir. 1999). Accordingly, the appeal 

is DISMISSED as moot, and counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is DENIED 

as unnecessary.

Case: 14-10769 Document: 00513079870 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/16/2015