Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_15-mc-00037/USCOURTS-caed-1_15-mc-00037-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Cement Masons Apprenticeship and Training Trust Fund for Northern California
Plaintiff
Cement Masons Pension Trust Fund for Northern California
Plaintiff
Cement Masons Vacation/Holiday Trust Fund for Northern California
Plaintiff
Concrete By SMC
Defendant
Samuel Magana Castillo
Defendant
The Board of Trustees
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER THAT U.S. MARSHAL NOT RELEASE PROPERTY CLAIMED AS EXEMPT UNTIL DISTRICT 

COURT RULES ON MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 

Case No. 15-MC-00037-EPG

WEINBERG, ROGER & 

ROSENFELD

A Professional Corporation

1001 Marina Village Parkway, Suite 200

Alameda, California 94501

(510) 337-1001

BARRY E. HINKLE, Bar No. 071223

TRACY L. MAINGUY, Bar No. 176928

KRISTINA M. ZINNEN, Bar No. 245346

WEINBERG, ROGER & ROSENFELD

A Professional Corporation

1001 Marina Village Parkway, Suite 200

Alameda, California 94501

Telephone (510) 337-1001

Fax (510) 337-1023

E-Mail: bhinkle@unioncounsel.net

tmainguy@unioncounsel.net

kzinnen@unioncounsel.net

Attorneys for Plaintiffs/ Judgment Creditors

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES, in their 

capacities as Trustees of the CEMENT 

MASONS HEALTH AND WELFARE TRUST 

FUND FOR NORTHERN CALIFORNIA; 

CEMENT MASONS PENSION TRUST FUND

FOR NORTHERN CALIFORNIA; CEMENT 

MASONS VACATION/HOLIDAY TRUST 

FUND FOR NORTHERN CALIFORNIA; and 

CEMENT MASONS APPRENTICESHIP AND 

TRAINING TRUST FUND FOR NORTHERN 

CALIFORNIA,

Plaintiffs,

v.

SAMUEL MAGANA CASTILLO, individually 

and doing business as CONCRETE BY SMC;

and CONCRETE BY SMC,

Defendants.

No. 15-MC-00037-EPG

ORDER THAT U.S. MARSHAL NOT 

RELEASE PROPERTY CLAIMED AS 

EXEMPT UNTIL DISTRICT COURT 

RULES ON MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S 

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 

Date: December 4, 2015

Time: 10:00 a.m.

Dept.: 10

Judge: Hon. Erica P. Grosjean

Case 1:15-mc-00037-DAD-EPG Document 19 Filed 12/04/15 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

ORDER THAT U.S. MARSHAL NOT RELEASE PROPERTY CLAIMED AS EXEMPT UNTIL DISTRICT 

COURT RULES ON MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 

Case No. 15-MC-00037-EPG

WEINBERG, ROGER & 

ROSENFELD

A Professional Corporation

1001 Marina Village Parkway, Suite 200

Alameda, California 94501

(510) 337-1001

Plaintiffs’ Motion for Order Determining Claim of Exemption came on for hearing on 

December 4, 2015 at 10:00 a.m. in the Courtroom of United States Magistrate Judge Erica P. 

Grosjean of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, located at 2500 

Tulare Street, Department 10, Fresno, California. Plaintiffs THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES, in 

their capacities as Trustees of the CEMENT MASONS HEALTH AND WELFARE TRUST 

FUND FOR NORTHERN CALIFORNIA; CEMENT MASONS PENSION TRUST FUND FOR 

NORTHERN CALIFORNIA; CEMENT MASONS VACATION/HOLIDAY TRUST FUND 

FOR NORTHERN CALIFORNIA; and CEMENT MASONS APPRENTICESHIP AND 

TRAINING TRUST FUND FOR NORTHERN CALIFORNIA (hereinafter “Trust Funds” or 

“Plaintiffs”) were represented by Tracy Mainguy of Weinberg, Roger & Rosenfeld, who appeared 

telephonically; Defendant made no appearance. 

The Court intends to recommend that Defendant’s claim of exemption be denied. Based 

on Plaintiffs’ representation that the U.S. Marshal may release the property at issue before such 

recommendations can be adopted by the United States District Judge assigned to this case, 

however, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the U.S. Marshal is 

DIRECTED to hold the property claimed to be exempt, which is the $13,580.00 in accounts 

receivable remitted to the U.S. Marshal by Dale Atkins Contractor in response to a levy, pending 

the United States District Judge’s adoption of the Court’s Findings and Recommendations 

regarding the claim of exemption.

The Court’s Findings and Recommendations will follow the issuance of this Order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: December 4, 2015 /s/

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:15-mc-00037-DAD-EPG Document 19 Filed 12/04/15 Page 2 of 2