Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_13-cv-02619/USCOURTS-caed-2_13-cv-02619-3/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Origen Biomedical, Inc.
Defendant
Thermogenesis Corp.
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 

THOMAS A. WOODS (SB #210050)

tawoods@stoel.com 

STOEL RIVES LLP

500 Capitol Mall, Suite 1600 

Sacramento, CA 95814 

Telephone: (916) 447-0700 

Facsimile: (916) 447-4781 

Attorneys for Defendant 

ORIGEN BIOMEDICAL, INC. 

ANDREA M. MILLER (SB #88992) 

amiller@nmlawfirm.com 

NAGELEY, MEREDITH & MILLER, INC. 

8801 Folsom Blvd., Suite 172 

Sacramento, CA 95826 

Telephone: (916) 386-8282 

Facsimile: (916) 386-8952 

JOANNA M. ESTY (SB #147903) 

jmesty@majestylaw.com 

MAJESTY LAW GROUP PLC 

6080 Center Drive, 6th Floor 

Los Angeles, CA 90045 

Telephone: (310) 376-2512 

Facsimile: (888) 618-0360 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

THERMOGENESIS CORP. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SACRAMENTO DIVISION 

THERMOGENESIS CORP., 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

ORIGEN BIOMEDICAL, INC., 

Defendant. 

Case No. 2:13-CV-02619-MCE-DAD

STIPULATION AND ORDER FURTHER 

ENLARGING TIME OF DEFENDANT 

ORIGEN BIOMEDICAL, INC. TO 

RESPOND TO COMPLAINT AND TO 

CONTINUE DEADLINES UNDER RULE 

26(f) 

[Fed. R. Civ. P. 6; Local Rule 144]

Case 2:13-cv-02619-MCE-DAD Document 15 Filed 03/11/14 Page 1 of 4
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 

WHEREAS on December 17, 2013 Plaintiff ThermoGenesis Corporation (“Plaintiff”) 

filed its Complaint for Patent Infringement (“Complaint”) against Defendant OriGen Biomedical, 

Inc. (“Defendant”); 

WHEREAS Defendant’s responsive pleading was initially due to be filed January 23, 

2014; 

WHEREAS on or about January 23, 2014, the parties submitted a STIPULATION, by and 

through their respective counsel, pursuant to Local Rule 144 and Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(b), for an 

approximate one month period of time for Defendant to file its responsive pleading to the 

Complaint, which time would enable the parties to better understand one another’s position and 

allow for a period of discussion aimed at early resolution of the matter. According to the parties’ 

Stipulation and the Order thereon, Defendant’s response to the Complaint is presently due on or 

before February 28, 2014. 

WHEREAS on February 7, 2014, the parties and their counsel met, in person, in 

Sacramento, California, to discuss one another’s positions concerning the issues raised in the 

Complaint. 

WHEREAS on February 7, 2014, the parties arrived at an oral agreement in principal to 

resolve this matter in full, pursuant to specific terms that are in the process of being memorialized 

in a writing between the parties. 

WHEREAS Plaintiff and Defendant, by and through their counsel of record, hereby 

STIPULATE to an additional extension of time for Defendant to respond to the Complaint, if 

necessary, until on or before Friday, March 14, 2014. This is additional extension of time (of 

less than one month) will enable the parties to prepare final documents resolving this matter in 

full, without the attention and resources of the parities and the court being diverted to responsive 

pleading preparation that is imminent, but likely unnecessary. 

Based on the foregoing, the parties agree that Defendant will have until March 14, 2014, 

to file its answer or to otherwise move in response to the Complaint. The parties also agree to a 

two week continuance of the deadline for counsel for Plaintiff and Defendant to meet-and-confer 

regarding a Joint Status Report and filing of a Joint Status Report, pursuant to the Court’s Order 

Case 2:13-cv-02619-MCE-DAD Document 15 Filed 03/11/14 Page 2 of 4
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 

Requiring Joint Status Report (see ECF No. 4) and consistent with Federal Rule of Civil 

Procedure 26(f), which deadline is currently scheduled for March 3, 2014. The new deadline for 

the parties to meet-and-confer and filed a Joint Status Report is therefore, March 17, 2014. 

DATED: February 25, 2014 

STOEL RIVES LLP

By: /s/ Thomas A. Woods 

THOMAS A. WOODS 

Attorneys for Defendant 

ORIGEN BIOMEDICAL, INC. 

DATED: February 24 2014 

MAJESTY LAW GROUP PLC 

By: /s/ JoAnna M. Esty 

(as authorized on 2/24/14) 

JOANNA M. ESTY 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

THERMOGENESIS CORP. 

/ / / / 

/ / / / 

/ / / / 

/ / / / 

/ / / / 

/ / / / 

/ / / / 

/ / / / 

/ / / / 

Case 2:13-cv-02619-MCE-DAD Document 15 Filed 03/11/14 Page 3 of 4
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 

ORDER 

Based upon the foregoing Stipulation of the Parties and for good cause appearing 

therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Parties’ request for leave to extend the time for 

Defendant Origen Biomedical, Inc. to respond to the complaint in the above-captioned action is 

GRANTED. Defendant’s response to the complaint in the form of an answer or motion must now 

be filed with the Court on or before March 14, 2014. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the 

deadline for the parties to meet-and-confer and submit a Joint Status Report consistent with Rule 

26(f) and this Court’s Order Requiring Joint Status Report shall be extended to March 17, 2014. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

 

 Dated: March 10, 2014 

Case 2:13-cv-02619-MCE-DAD Document 15 Filed 03/11/14 Page 4 of 4