Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_19-cv-05496/USCOURTS-cand-3_19-cv-05496-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Sattar Shanko
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

United States District Court 

Northern District of California 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SATTAR SHANKO, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

JOHN DOE, 

Defendant. 

Case No. 19-cv-05496-RS (PR) 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

Plaintiff has not complied with the Court’s orders to file (i) a complaint, and (ii) a 

complete application to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP). Accordingly, this federal civil 

rights action is DISMISSED (without prejudice) for failing to comply with the Court’s 

orders and for failing to prosecute, see Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). 

Because this dismissal is without prejudice, plaintiff may move to reopen the action. 

Any such motion must contain (i) a complaint that appears on this Court’s form; and (ii) a 

complete IFP application, which includes the application form itself (which must be filled 

out in full and signed); a Certificate of Funds signed by an authorized prison officer; and a 

prison trust account statement showing transactions for the last six months. The Clerk 

shall enter judgment in favor of defendant, and close the file. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: October ___, 2019

_________________________ 

 RICHARD SEEBORG 

 United States District Judge 

8

Case 3:19-cv-05496-RS Document 7 Filed 10/08/19 Page 1 of 1