Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_12-cv-02778/USCOURTS-caed-2_12-cv-02778-3/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Almond Board of California
Defendant
Tim Birmingham
Defendant
Susi McFarland
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1 

____________________________________________________________________________________________ 

STIPULATION REGARDING MODIFICATIONS TO LOCAL R. 230(c) and (d) Case No.: 2:12-cv-02778-JAM-CK

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Galen T. Shimoda (Cal. State Bar No. 226752) 

Jennet F. Zapata (Cal. State Bar No. 277063) 

Shimoda Law Corp. 

9401 East Stockton Blvd., Suite 200 

Elk Grove, CA 95624 

Telephone: (916) 525-0716; 

Facsimile: (916) 760-3733 

Email: attorney@shimodalaw.com

jzapata@shimodalaw.com

Attorneys for Plaintiff SUSI MCFARLAND 

Howard A. Sagaser (Cal. State Bar No. 72492) 

Marcia Ann Ross (Cal. State Bar No. 160489) 

Atkinson, Andelson, Loya, Ruud & Romo 

5260 N Palm Ave., Suite 300 

Fresno, CA 93704 

Telephone: (559) 225-6700 

Facsimile: (559) 255-3416 

Email: Hsagaser@aalrr.com

Attorneys for Defendant ALMOND BOARD OF CALIFORNIA 

Please refer to signature page for additional parties 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

WHEREAS, on or about May 7, 2013, Plaintiff’s counsel, Mr. Galen T. Shimoda, 

requested Defendants’ counsel, Ms. Marcia Ross, Mr. Howard A. Sagaser, and Mr. Michael 

Baytosh to stipulate to extend the time Plaintiff would have to file an opposition brief to a 

motion for summary judgment, if filed in this matter; and 

// 

SUSI MCFARLAND, 

 

 Plaintiff, 

vs. 

ALMOND BOARD OF CALIFORNIA; TIM 

BIRMINGHAM, an individual, and DOES 1 

to 100, inclusive, 

 

 Defendants. 

Case No.: 2:12-CV-02778-JAM-CKD

STIPULATION AND ORDER 

REGARDING TIME LIMITS TO FILE 

OPPOSITION AND REPLY BRIEFS TO 

MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

 

 

 

Case 2:12-cv-02778-JAM-CKD Document 33 Filed 05/28/13 Page 1 of 3
 

2 

____________________________________________________________________________________________ 

STIPULATION REGARDING MODIFICATIONS TO LOCAL R. 230(c) and (d) Case No.: 2:12-cv-02778-JAM-CK

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WHEREAS, on or about May 7, 2013, the parties agreed Plaintiff would have four 

weeks (28 days) to file an opposition brief to a motion for summary judgment, instead of 

fourteen (14) days as provided by Local Rule 230(c); and 

WHEREAS, on or about May 13, 2013, the parties agreed that any motion for summary 

judgment would be filed and served no less than 60 days prior to the scheduled hearing; and 

WHEREAS, on or about May 13, 2013, the parties agreed Defendants would have 

fourteen (14) days to file a reply brief to any opposition to a motion for summary judgment, 

instead of seven (7) days as provided by Local Rule 230(d); 

THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED as follows: 

By and through their attorneys of record, the parties agree to modify the time limitations 

provided by Local Rule 230(c) and (d) in that Plaintiff will have twenty eight (28) days to file 

an opposition brief to a motion for summary judgment; Defendants will have fourteen (14) days 

to file a reply brief to any opposition to a motion for summary judgment, and any motion for 

summary judgment will be filed and served on all parties no less than sixty (60) days prior to 

the scheduled hearing. 

DATED: May 24, 2013 Shimoda Law Corp.

 By: /s/Galen T. Shimoda 

Galen T. Shimoda 

Attorney for Plaintiff SUSI MCFARLAND 

DATED: May 24, 2013 Atkinson, Andelson, Loya, Ruud & Romo 

 By: __/s/Howard A. Sagaser____________

Howard A. Sagaser 

Marcia Ann Ross 

Attorney for Defendant ALMOND BOARD 

OF CALIFORNIA 

// 

// 

// 

// 

// 

Case 2:12-cv-02778-JAM-CKD Document 33 Filed 05/28/13 Page 2 of 3
 

3 

____________________________________________________________________________________________ 

STIPULATION REGARDING MODIFICATIONS TO LOCAL R. 230(c) and (d) Case No.: 2:12-cv-02778-JAM-CK

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DATED: May 23, 2013 Prout LeVangie 

 By: /s/__________________________________

Michael Baytosh (Cal. State Bar No.176189) 

Attorney for Defendant TIM BIRMINGHAM 

Prout LeVangie 

 2021 N Street 

 Sacramento, CA 95811 

 Telephone: (916) 443-4849 

 Facsimile: (916) 443-4855 

 Email: michael.baytosh@proutlaw.com 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: 5/24/2013 /s/ John A. Mendez____________

John A. Mendez 

U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 

Case 2:12-cv-02778-JAM-CKD Document 33 Filed 05/28/13 Page 3 of 3