Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_23-cv-02466/USCOURTS-caed-2_23-cv-02466-3/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Donald M. Bird
Plaintiff
Aaron Porter
Defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DONALD M. BIRD,

Plaintiff,

v.

AARON PORTER,

Defendant.

No. 2:23-cv-2466 DJC SCR

ORDER

Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed the above-entitled action. The matter was 

referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 

U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).

On September 23, 2024 the Magistrate Judge filed findings and 

recommendations, which were served on Plaintiff and which contained notice to 

Plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed 

within 14 days. ECF No. 6. Plaintiff has not filed objections to the findings and 

recommendations. 

The Court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to 

be supported by the record and by the Magistrate Judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS 

HEREBY ORDERED that: 

////

Case 2:23-cv-02466-DJC-SCR Document 7 Filed 12/20/24 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

1. The findings and recommendations filed September 23, 2024, are adopted 

in full;

2. This action is dismissed, without prejudice, for lack of prosecution and for 

failure to comply with the court’s order. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); Local Rule 110; and

3. The motion to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 2) is DENIED AS MOOT.

4. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: December 20, 2024 

Hon. Daniel J. Calabretta

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:23-cv-02466-DJC-SCR Document 7 Filed 12/20/24 Page 2 of 2