Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-00314/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-00314-3/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Rudy Preston Maes
Petitioner
Arnold Schwarzenegger
Respondent

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RUDY PRESTON MAES, )

)

)

Petitioner, )

)

v. )

)

)

ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, )

)

)

Respondent. )

)

 )

1:06-cv-00314 LJO-TAG (HC) 

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS (Doc. 8)

ORDER DISMISSING PETITION FOR WRIT

OF HABEAS CORPUS (Doc. 1, Attach. 1)

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT

TO ENTER JUDGMENT

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254.

On April 1, 2008, the Magistrate Judge assigned to the case filed Findings and

Recommendations recommending the petition for writ of habeas corpus be dismissed for lack of

exhaustion and for failure to comply with the requirements of 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d). (Doc. 8). 

The Findings and Recommendations were served on all parties and contained notice that any

objections were to be filed within fifteen days from the date of service of that order. To date, the

parties have not filed timely objections to the Findings and Recommendations.

///

Case 1:06-cv-00314-LJO-TAG Document 9 Filed 04/29/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted

a de novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court concludes that

the Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations are supported by the record and proper

analysis. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed April 1, 2007 (Doc. 8), is ADOPTED

IN FULL;

2. This petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. 1, Attach. 1), is DISMISSED; and

3. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to ENTER JUDGMENT and close the file. 

This order terminates the action in its entirety. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 29, 2008 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill 

b9ed48 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-00314-LJO-TAG Document 9 Filed 04/29/08 Page 2 of 2