Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_08-cv-00036/USCOURTS-caed-1_08-cv-00036-3/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Commissioner of Social Security
Defendant
Susie Dornay
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SUSIE DORNAY, CASE NO. 1:08-cv-00036 JLT

 

Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSEWHYSANCTIONS

SHOULD NOT BE IMPOSED FOR FAILURE

TO COMPLY WITH THE COURT’S ORDER 

v.

 (Doc. 16)

MICHAEL J. ASTRUE,

Commissioner of Social Security

Defendant.

 /

On January 2, 2008, Plaintiff filed a complaint seeking reversal of the Social Security

Agency’s determination to deny her benefits. (Doc. 2). On June 24, 2008, pursuant to a stipulation

of the parties, the Court directed remand of this matter to the Commissioner pursuant to sentence six

of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), for further proceedings. (Doc. 16). In that order, the Court directed the

parties “to file a joint status report every 60 days from the date of this Order. The joint status report

shall summarize the actions of both parties, and the assigned Administrative Law Judge, to cause this

case to be completed in a prompt and efficient manner, and shall include, without limitation, a

description of what actions have been taken and when they were accomplished, and what further

actions will be taken and when they will be accomplished.” (Id. at 2). The Court further warned the

parties that failure to comply with this requirement could result in the imposition of sanctions. (Id.) 

1

Case 1:08-cv-00036-JLT Document 28 Filed 04/30/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Review of the record indicates that the parties have not filed a Joint Status Report in this

matter in nearly four months.

 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the parties shall have 20 days from service of

this order to SHOW CAUSE why sanctions should not be imposed for failing to comply with the

Court’s order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 29, 2010 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston 

9j7khi UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

2

Case 1:08-cv-00036-JLT Document 28 Filed 04/30/10 Page 2 of 2