Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caDC-16-05323/USCOURTS-caDC-16-05323-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Hillary Rodham Clinton
Appellee
Jean Paul Gamarra
Appellant

Document Text:

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

____________

No. 16-5323 September Term, 2016

1:16-cv-01989-UNA

Filed On: January 25, 2017

Jean Paul Gamarra,

Appellant

v.

Hillary Rodham Clinton,

Appellee

ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

BEFORE: Henderson and Tatel, Circuit Judges, and Ginsburg, Senior Circuit

Judge

J U D G M E N T

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court

for the District of Columbia and on the brief filed by appellant on November 15, 2016,

and the supplement thereto. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); D.C. Cir. Rule 34(j). Upon

consideration of the foregoing and the notices filed by appellant, it is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s order entered October 6,

2016 be affirmed. The district court properly dismissed appellant’s complaint for lack of

subject matter jurisdiction on the ground that it is “‘patently insubstantial,’ presenting no

federal question suitable for decision.” Tooley v. Napolitano, 586 F.3d 1006, 1009

(D.C. Cir. 2009) (quoting Best v. Kelly, 39 F.3d 328, 330 (D.C. Cir. 1994)). 

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk

is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution

of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R. App.

P. 41(b); D.C. Cir. Rule 41.

Per Curiam

FOR THE COURT:

Mark J. Langer, Clerk 

BY: /s/

Michael C. McGrail 

Deputy Clerk

USCA Case #16-5323 Document #1657351 Filed: 01/25/2017 Page 1 of 1