Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_14-cv-01955/USCOURTS-caed-1_14-cv-01955-4/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
City of Bakersfield
Defendant
Officer Coleman
Defendant
Officer McCarthy
Defendant
Kent Williams
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Michael G. Marderosian, No. 77296

Heather S. Cohen, No. 263093

MARDEROSIAN & COHEN

1260 Fulton Mall

Fresno, CA 93721

Telephone: (559) 441-7991

Facsimile: (559) 441-8170

Virginia Gennaro, No. 138877

City Attorney

CITY OF BAKERSFIELD

1501 Truxtun Avenue

Bakersfield, CA 93301

Telephone: (661) 326-3721

Facsimile: (661) 852-2020

Attorneys for: Defendants CITY OF BAKERSFIELD, OFFICER VERION COLEMAN (sued 

herein as OFFICER COLEMAN and OFFICER ANTHONY McCARTHY (sued 

herein as OFFICER McCARTHY)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KENT WILLIAMS,

Plaintiff,

vs.

CITY OF BAKERSFIELD, OFFICER 

COLEMAN, OFFICER McCARTHY, and 

DOES 1 to 100, inclusive,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 1:14-CV-01955-JLT

STIPULATION TO DISMISS PARTIAL 

FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION, ENTIRE SIXTH 

CAUSE OF ACTION, ENTIRE SEVENTH 

CAUSE OF ACTION, ENTIRE EIGHTH 

CAUSE OF ACTION AND ENTIRE 

TWELFTH CAUSE OF ACTION SET 

FORTH IN PLAINTIFF’S FIRST AMENDED 

COMPLAINT [DKT. NO. 10]; PROPOSED

ORDER THEREON

(Doc. 42)

Plaintiff KENT WILLIAMS and Defendants CITY OF BAKERSFIELD, OFFICER VERION 

COLEMAN and OFFICER ANTHONY McCARTHY, by and through their attorneys of record herein, 

hereby stipulate and agree that:

Case 1:14-cv-01955-JLT Document 43 Filed 12/08/16 Page 1 of 3
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1. The part of Plaintiff’s First Cause of Action for Excessive Use of Force in Violation of 

the Fourth Amendment Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. Sections 1983, 1988 should be dismissed with prejudice 

as to all Defendants;

2. The Plaintiff’s entire Sixth Cause of Action for Violation of the Bane Civil Rights Act, 

California Civil Code Section 52.1 should be dismissed with prejudice as to all Defendants;

3. The Plaintiff’s entire Seventh Cause of Action for Assault Under California Law should 

be dismissed with prejudice as to all Defendants;

4. The Plaintiff’s entire Eighth Cause of Action for Battery Under California Law should 

be dismissed with prejudice as to all Defendants; and

5. The Plaintiff’s entire Twelfth Cause of Action for Intentional Infliction of Emotional 

Distress Under California Law should be dismissed with prejudice as to all Defendants.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Dated: December 8, 2016 RODRIGUEZ & ASSOCIATES

/s/ Chantal Trujillo

By:__________________________________

Chantal Trujillo,

Attorneys for Plaintiff

Dated: December 8, 2016 MARDEROSIAN & COHEN

/s/ Michael G. Marderosian

By:_________________________________

Michael G. Marderosian,

Attorneys for Defendants 

above-named.

Case 1:14-cv-01955-JLT Document 43 Filed 12/08/16 Page 2 of 3
3

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Pursuant the stipulation of the parties hereto, the Court ORDERS:

1. The part of Plaintiff’s First Cause of Action for Excessive Use of Force in Violation of 

the Fourth Amendment Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. Sections 1983, 1988 is dismissed with prejudice as to all 

Defendants;

2. The Plaintiff’s entire Sixth Cause of Action for Violation of the Bane Civil Rights Act, 

California Civil Code Section 52.1 is dismissed with prejudice as to all Defendants;

3. The Plaintiff’s entire Seventh Cause of Action for Assault Under California Law is 

dismissed with prejudice as to all Defendants;

4. The Plaintiff’s entire Eighth Cause of Action for Battery Under California Law is 

dismissed with prejudice as to all Defendants; and

5. The Plaintiff’s entire Twelfth Cause of Action for Intentional Infliction of Emotional 

Distress Under California Law is dismissed with prejudice as to all Defendants.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: December 8, 2016 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:14-cv-01955-JLT Document 43 Filed 12/08/16 Page 3 of 3