Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-01520/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-01520-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
M. S. Evans
Respondent
Ramiro Mata Tapia
Petitioner

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RAMIRO MATA TAPIA, 1:06-CV-1520 AWI DLB HC

Petitioner, ORDER TO SUBMIT NEW

APPLICATION TO PROCEED

vs. IN FORMA PAUPERIS AND

CERTIFIED COPY OF TRUST

M. S. EVANS, ACCOUNT STATEMENT OR

PAY FILING FEE

Respondent. 

 /

 

Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a petition for a writ of

habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 together with an application to proceed in forma

pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. However, petitioner’s application to proceed in forma

pauperis did not include the required original signature by an authorized officer of the institution

of incarceration. Additionally, petitioner has not filed a certified copy of his prison trust account

statement for the six month period immediately preceding the filing of the petition. See 28

U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2). Petitioner will be provided the opportunity to submit a new application to

proceed in forma pauperis and a certified copy of his trust account statement or pay the $5.00

filing fee.

Case 1:06-cv-01520-DLB Document 5 Filed 11/21/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Clerk’s Office shall send to petitioner the form for application to proceed

in forma pauperis.

2. Within thirty days of the date of service of this order, petitioner shall submit a

completed application to proceed in forma pauperis and a certified copy of his prison trust

account statement for the six month period immediately preceding the filing of the petition, or in

the alternative, pay the $5.00 filing fee for this action. Failure to comply with this order will

result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: November 21, 2006 /s/ Dennis L. Beck 

ah0l4d UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-01520-DLB Document 5 Filed 11/21/06 Page 2 of 2