Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-arwd-2_06-cv-02066/USCOURTS-arwd-2_06-cv-02066-2/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Jeff Attebury
Defendant
Jeremy Attebury
Defendant
Phil Attebury
Defendant
Kentucky Fried Chicken
Defendant
Doris A. Lindsay
Plaintiff
Yum Brands
Defendant

Document Text:

AO72A

(Rev. 8/82)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS

FORT SMITH DIVISION

DORIS A. LINDSAY PLAINTIFF

v. No. 06-2066

JEFF ATTEBURY; PHIL

ATTEBURY; JEREMY 

ATTEBURY; KENTUCKY

FRIED CHICKEN; YUM BRANDS DEFENDANTS

ORDER

Now on this 4 day of August 2006, there comes on for th

consideration the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation filed

on June 28, 2006 by the Honorable Beverly Stites Jones, United States

Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas. (Doc. 7.)

Plaintiff has filed written objections to the report and

recommendation. (Doc. 8.)

The Court has reviewed this case de novo and, being well and

sufficiently advised, finds as follows: The report and recommendation

is proper and should be and hereby is adopted in its entirety. 

Accordingly, the Court orders that the complaint not be served

and the case is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice for failure to state

a claim and for lack of personal jurisdiction over Defendants. 

IT IS SO ORDERED this 4 day of August 2006. th

 /S/ Robert T. Dawson 

 Robert T. Dawson

 United States District Judge 

Case 2:06-cv-02066-RTD Document 9 Filed 08/04/06 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: <pageID>