Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_13-cv-02619/USCOURTS-caed-2_13-cv-02619-2/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Origen Biomedical, Inc.
Defendant
Thermogenesis Corp.
Plaintiff

Document Text:

STOEL RIVES LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SACRAMENTO

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 

THOMAS A. WOODS (SB #210050)

tawoods@stoel.com 

BRIAN C. PARK (admitted pro hac vice) 

BCPark@stoel.com 

STOEL RIVES LLP 

500 Capitol Mall, Suite 1600 

Sacramento, CA 95814 

Telephone: (916) 447-0700 

Facsimile: (916) 447-4781 

Attorneys for Defendant 

ORIGEN BIOMEDICAL, INC. 

ANDREA M. MILLER (SB #88992) 

amiller@nmlawfirm.com 

NAGELEY, MEREDITH & MILLER, INC. 

8801 Folsom Blvd., Suite 172 

Sacramento, CA 95826 

Telephone: (916) 386-8282 

Facsimile: (916) 386-8952 

JOANNA M. ESTY (SB #147903) 

jmesty@majestylaw.com 

MAJESTY LAW GROUP PLC 

6080 Center Drive, 6th Floor 

Los Angeles, CA 90045 

Telephone: (310) 376-2512 

Facsimile: (888) 618-0360 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

THERMOGENESIS CORP. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SACRAMENTO DIVISION 

THERMOGENESIS CORP., 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

ORIGEN BIOMEDICAL, INC., 

Defendant. 

Case No. 2:13-CV-02619-MCE-DAD

CONFIDENTIALITY AGREEMENT 

AND STIPULATED PROTECTIVE 

ORDER 

Honorable Judge Morrison C. England, Jr.

Case 2:13-cv-02619-MCE-DAD Document 13 Filed 02/27/14 Page 1 of 20
STOEL RIVES LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SACRAMENTO

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

CONFIDENTIALITY AGREEMENT AND 

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER -1- 2:13-CV-02619-MCE-DAD 

75614768.1 0053535-00001 

CONFIDENTIALITY AGREEMENT AND STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 

In order to adequately protect material entitled to be kept confidential, to ensure that 

protection is afforded only to material so entitled, and to ensure that no competitive advantage is 

gained by the receiving party or any nonparty through such disclosure, the parties have stipulated 

and agreed to the provisions herein and so move the Court for entry of this Confidentiality 

Agreement and Stipulated Protective Order (“Order”). 

Good cause exists to protect the confidentiality of such information, as prejudice or harm 

to a Party may result if no protective order is granted. In particular, business competitors of 

Plaintiff or Defendant could obtain an unfair advantage and Plaintiff or Defendant could be 

economically prejudiced. The purpose of this Order is to protect the legitimately designated 

confidential business information to be produced in this action from public disclosure. 

Accordingly, the Parties hereby stipulate to and petition the Court to enter the following 

Order. The use or disclosure of confidential documents that the Parties to this Stipulated 

Protective Order or any third party produces or discloses in the above captioned case shall be 

subject to the terms of this Stipulated Protective Order. The Parties acknowledge that this Order 

does not confer blanket protections on all disclosures or responses to discovery and the 

protection it affords extends only to the limited information or items that are entitled under the 

applicable legal principles to treatment as confidential. The Parties further acknowledge, as set 

forth in Section 10 below, that this Stipulated Protective Order creates no entitlement to file 

confidential information under seal. 

2. DEFINITIONS 

2.1. Party: any party to this action, including all of its officers, directors, employees, 

consultants, retained experts, and outside counsel (and their support staff). 

2.2. Discovery Material: all items or information, regardless of the medium or manner 

generated, stored, or maintained (including, among other things, documents, electronic files, 

testimony, transcripts, written discovery responses, or tangible things) that are produced or 

generated in disclosures or responses to discovery in this matter. 

Case 2:13-cv-02619-MCE-DAD Document 13 Filed 02/27/14 Page 2 of 20
STOEL RIVES LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SACRAMENTO

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

-2- 

2.3. “Confidential” Information or Items: any and all discovery materials (regardless of 

how generated, stored or maintained) including electronic files, documents, things, written 

discovery responses, testimony, or other information derived therefrom of the producing party 

that are and have been maintained in confidence, including, but not limited to trade secrets; 

proprietary procedures, manuals, and policies; proprietary and confidential operations 

information, including, but not limited to, agreements or specifications; internal business or 

financial information, including, but not limited to, customer lists and sales information; 

confidential agreements; and other proprietary, confidential, or information or documents that 

are and have been maintained in confidence, that are designated as “Confidential” at the time of 

their production or disclosure in this action or within ten (10) court days after this Order is 

signed by the Court, or as otherwise provided herein. 

(a) “Confidential” Information or Items shall not include any document, 

information or other material which: 

1. is, at the time of disclosure, in the public domain by publication or 

otherwise; 

2. becomes at any time, through no act or failure to act on the part of 

the recipient party, part of the public domain by lawful publication or other lawful act; 

3. is already in the possession of the receiving party at the time of 

disclosure and was not acquired directly or indirectly from the disclosing party; or 

4. is or was made available to a party by a third party who obtained 

the same by legal means and without any obligation of confidentiality to the party to this 

litigation claiming its confidential nature. 

2.4. “Confidential – Attorney’s Eyes Only” Information or Items: any and all discovery 

materials (regardless of how generated, stored or maintained) including electronic files, 

documents, things, written discovery responses, testimony, or other information derived 

therefrom of the producing party of a highly confidential and/or proprietary nature. Such highly 

confidential and/or proprietary information may include: (i) financial information, (ii) current 

research and development efforts, (iii) products in development or not yet commercially 

Case 2:13-cv-02619-MCE-DAD Document 13 Filed 02/27/14 Page 3 of 20
STOEL RIVES LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SACRAMENTO

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

-3- 

introduced, (iv) current business strategies, (v) the identity of customers and/or suppliers, (vi) 

trade secrets, and/or (vii) any other material a party reasonably believes contains competitively 

sensitive business or technical information. 

(a) “Confidential- Attorney’s Only” Information or Items shall not include 

any document, information or other material which: 

1. is, at the time of disclosure, in the public domain by publication or 

otherwise; 

2. becomes at any time, through no act or failure to act on the part of 

the recipient party, part of the public domain by lawful publication or other lawful act; 

3. is already in the possession of the receiving party at the time of 

disclosure and was not acquired directly or indirectly from the disclosing party; or 

4. is or was made available to a party by a third party who obtained 

the same by legal means and without any obligation of confidentiality to the party to this 

litigation claiming its highly confidential nature. 

2.5. Receiving Party: a Party that receives Discovery Material from a Producing Party. 

2.6. Producing Party: a Party or non-party that produces Discovery Material in this 

action. 

2.7. Designating Party: a Party or non-party that designates information or items that it 

produces in disclosures or in responses to discovery as “Confidential” or as “Confidential – 

Attorney’s Eyes Only.” 

2.8. Protected Material: any Discovery Material that is designated as “Confidential” or as 

“Confidential – Attorney’s Eyes Only.” 

2.9. Counsel: attorneys who are retained to represent or advise a Party in this action (as 

well as their support staffs). 

2.10. Expert: a person with specialized knowledge or experience in a matter pertinent to 

the litigation who has been retained by a Party or its counsel to serve as an expert witness or as a 

consultant in this action and who is not a past or a current employee of an adverse Party, a 

present employee of a competitor of an adverse Party, and who, at the time of retention, is not 

Case 2:13-cv-02619-MCE-DAD Document 13 Filed 02/27/14 Page 4 of 20
STOEL RIVES LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SACRAMENTO

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

-4- 

anticipated to become an employee of an adverse Party or a competitor of an adverse Party. This 

definition includes a professional jury or trial consultant retained in connection with this 

litigation. 

2.11. Professional Vendors: persons or entities that provide litigation support services 

(e.g., photocopying; videotaping; translating; preparing exhibits or demonstrations; organizing, 

storing, retrieving data in any form or medium; etc.) and their employees and subcontractors. 

2.12. The term “trade secrets” shall be defined in accordance with California Civil Code 

§ 3426.1 and shall include, inter alia, any information, including a formula, pattern, compilation, 

program, device, method, technique, process, financial data, or list of actual or potential 

customers or suppliers that: 

(1) Derives independent economic value, actual or potential, from not being 

generally known to, and not being readily ascertainable by proper means by, the public or other 

persons who can obtain economic value from its disclosure or use; and 

(2) Is the subject of efforts that are reasonable under the circumstances to 

maintain its secrecy. 

3. SCOPE 

The protections conferred by this Stipulation and Order cover not only Protected Material 

(as defined above), but also any information copied or extracted therefrom, as well as all copies, 

excerpts, summaries, or compilations thereof, plus testimony, conversations, or presentations by 

parties or counsel to or in court or in other settings that actually reveal Protected Material. 

4. DURATION 

The obligations of this Order shall survive the termination of the action and continue to 

bind the parties, their counsel, experts, and anyone else who obtained Confidential or 

Confidential – Attorney’s Eyes Only information or items pursuant to this Order. Unless 

otherwise specified, the confidentiality obligations imposed by this Order shall remain in effect 

until a Designating Party agrees otherwise in writing or a court order otherwise directs. 

/// 

/// 

Case 2:13-cv-02619-MCE-DAD Document 13 Filed 02/27/14 Page 5 of 20
STOEL RIVES LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SACRAMENTO

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

-5- 

5. DESIGNATING PROTECTED MATERIAL 

5.1. Exercise of Restraint and Care in Designating Material for Protection. Each Party or 

non-party that designates information or items for protection under this Order must take care to 

limit any such designation to specific material that qualifies under the appropriate standards. A 

Designating Party must take care to designate for protection only those parts of material, 

documents, items, or oral or written communications that qualify – so that other portions of the 

material, documents, items, or communications for which protection is not warranted are not 

swept unjustifiably within the ambit of this Order. Mass or indiscriminate designations are 

prohibited. Designations that are shown to be clearly unjustified, or that have been made for an 

improper purpose (e.g., to unnecessarily encumber or retard the case development process, or to 

impose unnecessary expenses and burdens on other parties), expose the Designating Party to 

sanctions. If it comes to a Party's or a non-party's attention that information or items that it 

designated for protection do not qualify for protection at all, or do not qualify for the level of 

protection initially asserted, that Party or non-party must promptly notify all other parties that it 

is withdrawing the mistaken designation. 

5.2. Manner and Timing of Designations. Except as otherwise provided in this Order 

(see, e.g., second paragraph of section 5.2(a), below), or as otherwise stipulated or ordered, 

material that qualifies for protection under this Order must be clearly so designated before the 

material is disclosed or produced. Designation in conformity with this Order requires: 

(a) for information in documentary form (apart from transcripts of depositions 

or other pretrial or trial proceedings), that the Producing Party affix the legend “Confidential” or 

“Confidential – Attorney’s Eyes Only” conspicuously on each page that contains protected 

material. If only a portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the 

Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate 

markings in the margins) and must specify, for each portion, the level of protection being 

asserted (either “Confidential” or “Confidential – Attorney’s Eyes Only”). 

A Party or non-party that makes original documents or materials available for inspection 

need not designate them for protection until after the inspecting Party has indicated which 

Case 2:13-cv-02619-MCE-DAD Document 13 Filed 02/27/14 Page 6 of 20
STOEL RIVES LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SACRAMENTO

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

-6- 

material it would like copied and produced. During the inspection and before the designation, all 

of the material made available for inspection shall be deemed “Confidential” but shall be viewed 

only by a Receiving Party’s outside counsel of record. After the inspecting Party has identified 

the documents it wants copied and produced, the Producing Party must determine which 

documents, or portions thereof, qualify for protection under this Order, then, before producing 

the specified documents, the Producing Party must affix the appropriate legend “Confidential” or 

“Confidential – Attorney’s Eyes Only” on each page that contains Protected Material. If only a 

portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also 

must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the 

margins). 

(b) for responses to Interrogatories, Requests for Admission, Demands for 

Inspection, and Requests for Production containing Confidential information or items or 

Confidential Attorney’s Eyes Only information or items, the title page of the document 

containing the responses shall be marked “Confidential” or “Confidential – Attorney’s Eyes 

Only.” In addition, the provisions of Section 5.2(a) apply to all such documents. 

(c) for testimony given in deposition or in other pretrial or trial proceedings, 

that Designating Party, or if the Designating Party is not present the Party or non-party offering or 

sponsoring the testimony, identify on the record before the close of the deposition, hearing, or 

other proceeding, all protected testimony, and further specify any portions of the testimony that 

qualify as “Confidential” or “Confidential – Attorney’s Eyes Only.” When it is impractical to 

identify separately each portion of testimony that is entitled to protection, and when it appears 

that substantial portions of the testimony may qualify for protection, any Party may state on the 

record which portions of the deposition include “Confidential” and/or “Confidential – Attorney’s 

Eyes Only” material. In the alternative, to obtain protection under this Order, a Designating Party 

may notify the opposing party in writing within ten (10) court days of the receipt of the transcript 

of those portions of the testimony as to which protection is sought and to specify the level of 

protection being asserted “Confidential” or “Confidential – Attorney’s Eyes Only”), in which 

case only those portions of the testimony that are appropriately designated for protection within 

Case 2:13-cv-02619-MCE-DAD Document 13 Filed 02/27/14 Page 7 of 20
STOEL RIVES LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SACRAMENTO

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

-7- 

the ten (10) court days shall be covered by the provisions of this Stipulated Protective Order. 

Until such time period passes, all parties shall treat the deposition transcript as Confidential if a 

statement has been made on the record that the transcript contains Confidential material, or as 

Confidential – Attorney’s Eyes Only if a statement has been made on the record that the transcript 

contains Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes Only material. Transcript pages containing Protected 

Material shall be separated from the non-confidential portions and shall be securely sealed in an 

envelope by the court reporter. Both the transcript and the envelope shall be marked 

“CONFIDENTIAL UNDER PROTECTIVE ORDER.” The court reporter shall provide copies of 

the confidential portion(s) of the deposition transcript only to the Counsel of the Parties to this 

Stipulated Protective Order and to the testifying witness. 

(d) for information produced in some form other than documentary, and for 

any other tangible items, that the Producing Party affix in a prominent place on the exterior of 

the container or containers in which the information or item is stored the legend “Confidential” 

or “Confidential – Attorney’s Eyes Only.” If only portions of the information or item warrant 

protection, the Producing Party, to the extent practicable, shall identify the protected portions, 

specifying whether they qualify as “Confidential” or as “Confidential – Attorney’s Eyes Only.” 

5.3. Inadvertent Failures to Designate. If timely corrected, an inadvertent failure to 

designate qualified information or items as “Confidential” or “Confidential – Attorney’s Eyes 

Only” does not, standing alone, waive the Designating Party's right to secure protection under 

this Order for such material. If material is appropriately designated as “Confidential” or 

“Confidential – Attorney’s Eyes Only” after the material was initially produced, the Receiving 

Party, on timely notification of the designation, must make reasonable efforts to assure that the 

material is treated in accordance with the provisions of this Order. 

6. CHALLENGING CONFIDENTIALITY DESIGNATIONS 

6.1. Timing of Challenges. A Party does not waive its right to challenge a 

confidentiality designation by electing not to mount a challenge promptly after the original 

designation is disclosed. 

Case 2:13-cv-02619-MCE-DAD Document 13 Filed 02/27/14 Page 8 of 20
STOEL RIVES LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SACRAMENTO

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

-8- 

6.2. Meet and Confer. A Party that elects to initiate a challenge to a Designating Party's 

confidentiality designation must do so in good faith and must begin the process by conferring 

directly (in voice to voice dialogue or by e-mail) with Counsel for the Designating Party. For 

any designation of “Confidential – Attorney’s Eyes Only,” the Designating Party shall, within 

five (5) court days following a request, provide the Party challenging the designation with a 

written statement supporting its contention why disclosure to another Party or nonparty would 

create a substantial risk of serious injury that could not be avoided by less restrictive means 

including a designation as “Confidential.” If such statement is not timely provided, the material 

will be automatically reclassified as “Confidential.” In conferring regarding “Confidential” 

designations, the Designating Party must explain in writing, within ten (10) court days following 

a request to justify a designation, the basis for its belief that the confidentiality designation was 

proper or whether it will reconsider the circumstances and change the designation. A 

challenging Party may proceed to the next stage of the process only if it has engaged in this meet 

and confer process first. 

6.3. Judicial Intervention. A Party that elects to press a challenge to a confidentiality 

designation after considering the justification offered by the Designating Party may file and 

serve a motion, consistent with the requirements of Section 10 of this Protective Order, that 

identifies the challenged material and sets forth in detail the basis for the challenge. Each such 

motion must be accompanied by a competent declaration that affirms that the movant has 

complied with the meet and confer requirements imposed in the preceding paragraph and that 

sets forth with specificity the justification for the confidentiality designation that was given by 

the Designating Party in the meet and confer dialogue. 

6.4. The burden of persuasion in any such challenge proceeding shall be on the 

Designating Party. Until the court rules on the challenge, all parties shall continue to afford the 

material in question the level of protection to which it is entitled under the Producing Party's 

designation. 

/// 

/// 

Case 2:13-cv-02619-MCE-DAD Document 13 Filed 02/27/14 Page 9 of 20
STOEL RIVES LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SACRAMENTO

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

-9- 

7. ACCESS TO AND USE OF PROTECTED MATERIAL 

7.1. Basic Principles. Any person subject to this Stipulated Protective Order and in 

possession of Confidential Information or Confidential – Attorney’s Eyes Only Information of 

another party or non-party shall exercise reasonable and appropriate care with regard to the 

storage, custody and use of Confidential Information and Confidential – Attorney’s Eyes Only 

Information in order to ensure that the confidential nature of the same is maintained. A 

Receiving Party may use Protected Material that is disclosed or produced by another Party or by 

a non-party in connection with this case only for prosecuting, defending, or attempting to settle 

this litigation, and not for any business purposes or in connection with any other litigation or 

other judicial or administrative proceeding. Such Protected Material may be disclosed only to 

the categories of persons and under the conditions described in this Order. When the litigation 

has been terminated, a Receiving Party must comply with the provisions of Section 11, below 

(FINAL DISPOSITION). Protected Material must be stored and maintained by a Receiving 

Party at a location and in a secure manner that ensures that access is limited to the persons 

authorized under this Order. 

7.2. Disclosure of “Confidential” Information or Items. Unless otherwise ordered by the 

Court or permitted in writing by the Designating Party, a Receiving Party may disclose any 

information or item designated “Confidential” only to: 

a. Any outside legal counsel of record and any member of management 

designated in writing by a Party to receive Confidential information. 

b. Court personnel, stenographic reporters, and videographers engaged in 

proceedings incident to this litigation, including preparation for trial or trial; 

c. Clerical personnel and paralegal assistants employed by the legal counsel 

or contracted by such firms; and 

d. Persons who, on the face of a document, either authored or received the 

document. 

e. If a party to this Stipulated Protective Order seeks to have an expert(s) 

receive Confidential Information or Confidential – Attorney’s Eyes Only Information of another 

Case 2:13-cv-02619-MCE-DAD Document 13 Filed 02/27/14 Page 10 of 20
STOEL RIVES LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SACRAMENTO

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

-10- 

party or non-party, the party shall nominate such expert(s) to whom disclosure of Confidential 

Information or Confidential – Attorney’s Eyes Only Information may be made, as follows: 

 (i) Each such nominee shall be particularly identified by written notice 

to the attorneys of all parties. Such notice shall include a brief description of the nominee’s 

purpose in being provided with the Confidential Information or Confidential – Attorney’s Eyes 

Only Information, the nominee’s curriculum vitae, and a signed copy of the “Confidentiality 

Undertaking” that is attached as Exhibit A. 

 (ii) Within five (5) court days after receipt of such notice, any 

undersigned party, for good cause, may oppose the nomination by serving a written objection to 

the nomination. Within ten (10) court days of sending the notice, the opposing party may file a 

motion to preclude disclosure to the nominated expert. 

 (iii) The party seeking the nomination shall not disclose any 

Confidential Information or Confidential – Attorney’s Eyes Only Information of the objecting 

party to the nominee unless 1) the objecting party agrees in writing to the disclosure; 2) a Court 

Order permits the disclosure; or 3) the time for an objecting party to serve a notice or a motion 

under Section 7.2(f)(ii) has expired. 

 (iv) Any person as may be hereafter qualified to receive Confidential 

Information or Confidential – Attorney’s Eyes Only Information, pursuant to paragraph 7.2(e) 

above (1) shall not retain copies of such Confidential Information or Confidential – Attorney’s 

Eyes Only Information in tangible or machine readable form after termination of proceedings in 

this litigation, shall not use such Confidential Information or Confidential – Attorney’s Eyes Only 

Information other than in connection with this case, and shall not disclose such Confidential 

Information or Confidential – Attorney’s Eyes Only Information to anyone not authorized under 

this Stipulated Protective Order; and (2) must agree to be bound by the terms of this Stipulated 

Protective Order by executing Exhibit A attached hereto. 

7.3. Disclosure of “Confidential – Attorney’s Eyes Only” Information or Items. Unless 

otherwise ordered by the Court or permitted in writing by the Designating Party, a Receiving 

Party may disclose any information or item designated “Confidential – Attorney’s Eyes Only” 

Case 2:13-cv-02619-MCE-DAD Document 13 Filed 02/27/14 Page 11 of 20
STOEL RIVES LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SACRAMENTO

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

-11- 

only to those legal counsel and individuals authorized to access Confidential Information under 

Section 7.2(a) - (d), with the exception of management for either Party designated in section 

7.2(a) above. 

7.4. Nothing contained herein shall prevent the use of the Confidential Information or 

Confidential – Attorney’s Eyes Only Information of another party at any hearing, trial or 

proceeding in this case, or in or with any written submissions to the Court in connection with this 

litigation, or any appeal relating thereto, provided that the parties to this Stipulated Protective 

Order shall take appropriate measures to maintain their confidentiality, including filing under 

seal written submissions to the Court that include such Confidential Information or Confidential 

– Attorney’s Eyes Only Information. The parties to this Stipulated Protective Order shall make 

reasonable efforts to minimize filings under seal and shall place Confidential Information or 

Confidential – Attorney’s Eyes Only Information only in attachments whenever possible. 

7.5. When Confidential Information or Confidential – Attorney’s Eyes Only Information 

of another party to this Stipulated Protective Order is discussed, quoted or referred to in any 

deposition, the Parties shall cooperate to ensure that only persons qualified to have access are 

present. 

7.6. Nothing herein shall preclude a party from using its own Confidential or 

Confidential – Attorney’s Eyes Only information or items in any manner. 

7.7. Competitive Decision-Making Bar. Protected Material under this Protective Order 

shall be used by Receiving Parties solely for the preparation and trial of this Action (including 

appeals and retrials, if any) and Protected Material shall not be used for any other purpose. 

a. Absent written consent from the Designating Party, any individual who 

receives or desires to receive access to any Party’s Confidential - Attorneys’ Eyes Only 

Information in this action, shall not be involved in competitive decision making (as defined in 

U.S. Steel Corp. v. United States, 730 F.2d 1465, 1468 n.3 (Fed. Cir. 1984)) for the Receiving 

Party. 

b. The competitive decision making bar herein shall commence when 

Confidential - Attorneys’ Eyes Only Information is first received by the affected individual and 

Case 2:13-cv-02619-MCE-DAD Document 13 Filed 02/27/14 Page 12 of 20
STOEL RIVES LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SACRAMENTO

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

-12- 

shall end one (1) year after final termination of this litigation (including appeals and retrials, if 

any). 

8. PROTECTED MATERIAL SUBPOENAED OR ORDERED PRODUCED IN 

OTHER LITIGATION. 

If a Receiving Party is served with a subpoena or an order issued in other litigation that 

would compel disclosure of any information or items designated in this action as “Confidential” 

or “Confidential – Attorney’s Eyes Only,” the Receiving Party must so notify the Designating 

Party, in writing (by fax or e-mail, if possible) as soon as practicable, and each party will use its 

best efforts to provide this notice within five (5) court days after receiving the subpoena or order. 

Such notification must include a copy of the subpoena or court order. The Receiving Party also 

must make reasonable efforts to inform in writing promptly the party who caused the subpoena 

or order to issue in the other litigation that some or all the material covered by the subpoena or 

order is the subject of this Protective Order. In addition, the Receiving Party must deliver a copy 

of this Stipulated Protective Order promptly to the party in the other action that caused the 

subpoena or order to issue. The purpose of imposing these duties is to alert the interested parties 

to the existence of this Protective Order and to afford the Designating Party in this case an 

opportunity to try to protect its confidentiality interests in the court from which the subpoena or 

order issued. The Designating Party shall bear the burdens and the expenses of seeking 

protection in that court of its confidential material – and nothing in these provisions should be 

construed as authorizing or encouraging a Receiving Party in this action to disobey a lawful 

directive from another court. 

9. UNAUTHORIZED DISCLOSURE OF PROTECTED MATERIAL 

If a Receiving Party learns that, by inadvertence or otherwise, it has disclosed Protected 

Material to any person or in any circumstance not authorized under this Stipulated Protective 

Order, the Receiving Party must immediately (a) notify in writing the Designating Party of the 

unauthorized disclosures, (b) use its best efforts to retrieve all copies of the Protected Material, 

(c) inform the person or persons to whom unauthorized disclosures were made of all the terms of 

this Order, and (d) request such person or persons to execute Exhibit A. 

Case 2:13-cv-02619-MCE-DAD Document 13 Filed 02/27/14 Page 13 of 20
STOEL RIVES LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SACRAMENTO

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

-13- 

10. FILING PROTECTED MATERIAL 

A Receiving Party may not file in the public record in this action any Protected Material 

without complying with the rules of Court regarding lodging or filing material under seal. Each 

Party agrees not to oppose any motion to seal Protected Material, except and only to the extent 

that a Party has previously challenged, in any manner, the designation of the Protected Material 

which is the subject of the motion to seal. 

11. FINAL DISPOSITION 

11.1. Unless otherwise ordered or agreed in writing by the Producing Party, within sixty 

(60) court days after the final termination of this action and upon demand, each Receiving Party 

must return all Protected Material to the Producing Party. As used in this subdivision, “all 

Protected Material” includes all copies, abstracts, compilations, summaries or any other form of 

reproducing or capturing any of the Protected Material. With permission in writing from the 

Designating Party, the Receiving Party may destroy some or all of the Protected Material instead 

of returning it. Whether the Protected Material is returned or destroyed, the Receiving Party 

must submit a written certification to the Producing Party (and, if not the same person or entity, 

to the Designating Party) by the sixty (60) day deadline that identifies (by category, where 

appropriate) all the Protected Material that was returned or destroyed and that affirms that the 

Receiving Party has not retained any copies, abstracts, compilations, summaries or other forms 

of reproducing or capturing any of the Protected Material. Notwithstanding this provision, 

Counsel are entitled to retain an archival copy of all pleadings, motion papers, transcripts, legal 

memoranda, correspondence or attorney work product, even if such materials contain Protected 

Material. Any such archival copies that contain or constitute Protected Material remain subject 

to this Protective Order as set forth in Section 4 (DURATION), above. 

11.2. Patent Prosecution Bar. Any attorney who, on behalf of a Receiving Party, reviews 

any “Confidential” or “Confidential – Attorney’s Eyes Only” information or items shall not 

thereafter prosecute or file, on behalf of any party, or any other client, for one (1) year after final 

termination of this litigation (including appeals, if any) any U.S. or foreign patent application 

that claims, discloses, or describes the subject matter of the Protected Material of the Producing 

Case 2:13-cv-02619-MCE-DAD Document 13 Filed 02/27/14 Page 14 of 20
STOEL RIVES LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SACRAMENTO

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

-14- 

Party disclosed in any “Confidential” or “Confidential – Attorney’s Eyes Only” materials, as 

defined in Sections 2.3(a) and 2.4(a). For purposes of this Section 11.2, prohibited patent 

prosecution shall include, without limitation: preparation of and/or amendments to original, 

continuation, divisional, continuation-in-part, request for continued examination, reexamination, 

reissue, inter partes review, post-grant proceedings, substitute, renewal or convention patent 

applications; claims drafting; or consultation on any of the above matters with others performing 

these activities. 

12. MISCELLANEOUS 

12.1. Nothing herein shall prevent disclosure if each party designating information as 

“Confidential” or “Confidential – Attorney’s Eyes Only” consents in writing to such disclosure. 

12.2. General disclosures of information shall not be deemed to place more specific 

disclosures of information concerning the same subject into the public domain. 

12.3. Right to Further Relief. Nothing in this Order abridges the right of any person to 

seek its modification by the Court in the future. 

12.4. Right to Assert Other Objections. By stipulating to the entry of this Protective 

Order, no Party waives any right it otherwise would have to object to disclosing or producing 

any information or item on any ground not addressed in this Stipulated Protective Order. 

Similarly, no Party waives any right to object on any ground to use in evidence any of the 

material covered by this Protective Order. This Stipulated Protective Order is not intended to 

deal with any discovery objections on the grounds of relevancy, attorney-client privilege or work 

product, or other evidentiary grounds, or to preclude any party to this Stipulated Protective Order 

from seeking relief either from a provision of this Stipulated Protective Order or any other relief 

from this Court which may be appropriate under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or the 

Federal Rules of Evidence. In the event that information is redacted and/or withheld from 

disclosure, the party requesting the information may move for an Order compelling further 

disclosure of the redacted and/or withheld information. Upon written request by the moving 

party during a motion to compel, an unredacted copy of the information sought shall be lodged 

with the Court, under seal, for an in camera inspection by the Court. 

Case 2:13-cv-02619-MCE-DAD Document 13 Filed 02/27/14 Page 15 of 20
STOEL RIVES LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SACRAMENTO

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

-15- 

12.5. This Stipulated Protective Order is entered solely for the purpose of facilitating the 

exchange of documents and information between the parties hereto without involving the Court 

unnecessarily in the process. Nothing in this Stipulated Protective Order (or the production of 

any information of documents under the terms of this Order) shall be deemed to have the effect 

of an admission or waiver by either party or of altering the confidentiality or non-confidentiality 

of any such document or information or altering any existing obligation of any party or the 

absence thereof. 

12.6. Nothing in this Stipulated Protective Order shall disqualify, bar, or otherwise 

restrict any attorney from rendering advice to his client with respect to this litigation and, in the 

course thereof referring or relying generally upon his or her examination of documents, items, or 

information designated “Confidential” or “Confidential – Attorney’s Eyes Only”; provided, 

however, that in rendering such advice and in otherwise communicating with his or her clients, 

the attorney shall not disclose the contents of such information or documents contrary to the 

terms of this Stipulated Protective Order. 

12.7. The Parties to this Stipulated Protective Order and their Counsel agree to be bound 

by the terms of this Stipulated Protective Order as soon as they sign this document, irrespective 

of when the Court actually signs it. 

13. NON-WAIVER OF PRIVILEGE OR WORK PRODUCT (FED. R. EVID. 502(d) 

13.1. The disclosure, through inadvertence, mistake, accident, or other error, by one 

party to another of the substance of any document or communication entitled to protection under 

the attorney-client privilege and/or the attorney work-product doctrine shall not constitute a 

waiver of such protection as to the subject matter of those, or related, documents or 

communications. If during the discovery process in this case either party mistakenly produces a 

document entitled to protection under the attorney-client privilege or the attorney work-product 

doctrine, the Producing Party may, at any time prior to the commencement of trial, but in any 

event not more than fifteen (15) court days after the disclosure is first identified as containing 

potentially privileged or work product information, marked as a deposition exhibit, or identified 

as a potential trial exhibit, request the return or destruction of the document and all copies 

Case 2:13-cv-02619-MCE-DAD Document 13 Filed 02/27/14 Page 16 of 20
STOEL RIVES LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SACRAMENTO

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

-16- 

thereof. Such a request must be made in writing and must identify the basis for the privilege or 

work product claimed. 

13.2. In the case of documents, if the Receiving Party agrees that it is privileged or work 

product (without regard to its production), then the document and all copies shall promptly be 

returned to the Producing Party or destroyed, and no reference to such document shall be made 

in connection with the proof of the facts in this dispute. If the Receiving Party does not agree 

that the document was privileged, then it shall so notify the Producing Party in writing within ten 

(10) court days of receiving written notice of the asserted privilege or work product protection. 

In such event, the Producing Party may move the Court to resolve the question. Unless the 

parties otherwise agree in writing, any such motion must be made within fifteen (15) court days 

of receiving notification that the Receiving Party disputes the claim of privilege or work product. 

a. If the Court rules that the document is protected (without regard to the fact 

of production), then the Receiving Party shall promptly return the document and all known 

copies to the Producing Party (except that counsel of record may retain copies as needed for the 

sole purpose of seeking reconsideration or appellate review of the Court’s ruling on the question 

of privilege or work product) and shall make no reference to the document in connection with the 

proof of the facts in this case. 

b. If the Court rules that the document is not protected (without regard to the 

fact of production), then the Receiving Party may retain the document pursuant to the terms of 

this Protective Order, subject to the designation of the document by the Producing Party under 

Section 5.3 hereof. 

DATED: February 19, 2014 

STOEL RIVES LLP 

By: /s/ Thomas A. Woods 

THOMAS A. WOODS 

Attorneys for Defendant 

ORIGEN BIOMEDICAL, INC. 

Case 2:13-cv-02619-MCE-DAD Document 13 Filed 02/27/14 Page 17 of 20
STOEL RIVES LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SACRAMENTO

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

-17- 

DATED: February 19, 2014 

MAJESTY LAW GROUP PLC 

By: /s/ JoAnna M. Esty 

(as authorized on 2/3/14) 

JOANNA M. ESTY 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

THERMOGENESIS CORP. 

ORDER 

Pursuant to the parties’ stipulation, and good cause appearing, 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

 Dated: February 27, 2014 

Case 2:13-cv-02619-MCE-DAD Document 13 Filed 02/27/14 Page 18 of 20
STOEL RIVES LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SACRAMENTO

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

CONFIDENTIALITY UNDERTAKING 2:13-CV-02619-MCE-DAD 

75614768.1 0053535-00001 

THOMAS A. WOODS (SB #210050)

tawoods@stoel.com 

BRIAN C. PARK (admitted pro hac vice) 

BCPark@stoel.com 

STOEL RIVES LLP 

500 Capitol Mall, Suite 1600 

Sacramento, CA 95814 

Telephone: (916) 447-0700 

Facsimile: (916) 447-4781 

Attorneys for Defendant 

ORIGEN BIOMEDICAL, INC. 

ANDREA M. MILLER (SB #88992) 

amiller@nmlawfirm.com 

NAGELEY, MEREDITH & MILLER, INC. 

8801 Folsom Blvd., Suite 172 

Sacramento, CA 95826 

Telephone: (916) 386-8282 

Facsimile: (916) 386-8952 

JOANNA M. ESTY (SB #147903) 

jmesty@majestylaw.com 

MAJESTY LAW GROUP PLC 

6080 Center Drive, 6th Floor 

Los Angeles, CA 90045 

Telephone: (310) 376-2512 

Facsimile: (888) 618-0360 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

THERMOGENESIS CORP. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SACRAMENTO DIVISION 

THERMOGENESIS CORP., 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

ORIGEN BIOMEDICAL, INC., 

Defendant. 

Case No. 2:13-CV-02619-MCE-DAD

CONFIDENTIALITY UNDERTAKING 

Honorable Judge Morrison C. England, Jr.

Case 2:13-cv-02619-MCE-DAD Document 13 Filed 02/27/14 Page 19 of 20
STOEL RIVES LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SACRAMENTO

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

CONFIDENTIALITY UNDERTAKING -1- 2:13-CV-02619-MCE-DAD 

75614768.1 0053535-00001 

I, ___________________________________, declare that: 

1. My address is _________________________________________. 

2. My present employer is ___________________________________. 

3. My present occupation or job description is 

 . 

4. I have carefully read and received a copy of the Protective Order entered in this 

action on _______________________ ___, 2014. 

5. I hereby agree, under penalty of contempt of court, to be bound by and comply 

with the terms of the Protective Order and not to disseminate or disclose any information 

contained in the Protective Order, which I either review or about which I am told, to any person, 

entity, party, or agency for any reason, except in accordance with the terms of the Protective 

Order. 

6. I will return all confidential material that comes into my possession, and 

documents or things that I have prepared relating thereto, to counsel for the party by whom I am 

employed or retained. 

7. I further agree to submit to the jurisdiction of this Court for the purposes of 

enforcement of the terms of this Protective Order. 

I declare under penalty of perjury of the laws of the United States that the foregoing is true 

and correct. 

 EXECUTED this ___________ day of _________________, 2014. 

 

 (Signature) 

 

 (Typed Name) 

Case 2:13-cv-02619-MCE-DAD Document 13 Filed 02/27/14 Page 20 of 20