Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_18-cv-05144/USCOURTS-cand-4_18-cv-05144-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
County of Napa
Defendant
Joseph Fallon
Defendant
Brandon Kemp
Defendant
Dante Michelucci
Plaintiff
Lenard Vare
Defendant

Document Text:

HIRSCHFELD KRAEMER LLP

ATTORN EYS AT LAW

SAN FRA N CI S CO

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE THE INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT 

CONFERENCE AND RELATED DATES • CASE NO. 4:18-CV-05144-HSG 4831-4225-3944

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 

CARMEN PLAZA DE JENNINGS (SBN 091742)

cpdjennings@hkemploymentlaw.com 

JAYNE BENZ CHIPMAN (SBN 140048) 

jchipman@hkemploymentlaw.com 

IAN W. FORGIE (SBN 307721) 

iforgie@hkemploymentlaw.com 

HIRSCHFELD KRAEMER LLP 

505 Montgomery Street 13th Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94111 

Telephone: (415) 835-9000 

Facsimile: (415) 834-0443 

Attorneys for Defendant 

COUNTY OF NAPA 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

DANTE MICHELUCCI,

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

COUNTY OF NAPA; JOSEPH FALLON; 

BRANDON KEMP; LENARD VARE; and 

DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, 

Defendants. 

Case No. 4:18-cv-05144-HSG

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO 

CONTINUE THE INITIAL CASE 

MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND 

RELATED DATES 

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff DANTE MICHELUCCI 

(“Plaintiff”), and Defendant COUNTY OF NAPA (“Defendant Napa”) (collectively, the 

“Parties”) that the dates set forth in the Court’s September 6, 2018 Notice Setting Case 

Management Conference for Reassigned Civil Case be continued. The Parties stipulate and 

request the continuance because Plaintiff filed a First Amended Complaint on October 23, 2018, 

and Defendant Napa intends to file a Rule 12 motion by November 6, 2018, which will not be 

heard prior to the presently scheduled November 20, 2018 Case Management Conference. 

The Parties agree that they would mutually benefit by continuing the Initial Case 

Management Conference (November 20, 2018), the related Rule 26(f) and ADR obligations and 

Case 4:18-cv-05144-HSG Document 25 Filed 10/30/18 Page 1 of 2
HIRSCHFELD KRAEMER LLP

ATTORN EYS AT LAW

SAN FRA N CI S CO

2

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE THE INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT 

CONFERENCE AND RELATED DATES • CASE NO. 4:18-CV-05144-HSG 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 

filings, and the Joint Case Management Conference Statement, until a reasonable time after the 

Court’s decision on Defendant Napa’s Rule 12 motion. 

Dated: October 29, 2018 HIRSCHFELD KRAEMER LLP 

By: /s/ Carmen Plaza de Jennings 

Carmen Plaza de Jennings 

Jayne Benz Chipman 

Ian W. Forgie 

Attorneys for Defendant 

COUNTY OF NAPA 

Dated: October 29, 2018 BROWN POORE LLP

By: /s/ David M. Poore 

David M. Poore 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

DANTE MICHELUCCI 

ORDER 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: __________________, 2018 ______________________________________ 

Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. 

 October 30

Case 4:18-cv-05144-HSG Document 25 Filed 10/30/18 Page 2 of 2