Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00285/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00285-2/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Lorne McCan
Respondent
United States of America
Petitioner

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

vs. )

)

JEAN ANNETTE LIASCOS, )

)

Respondent. )

)

)

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

vs. )

)

LORNE McCAN, )

)

Respondent. )

______________________________)

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

vs. )

)

V. STEVEN BOOTH and LOUISE Q. )

BOOTH, )

)

Respondents. )

______________________________)

1:05-CV-258 REC DLB

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE:

CONTEMPT

1:05-CV-285 REC DLB

1:05-CV-290 REC DLB

Case 1:05-cv-00285-REC-DLB Document 37 Filed 07/15/05 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )

)

Petitioner, ) 1:05-CV-302 REC DLB

)

vs. )

)

JOHN INNIS, JR., )

)

Respondent, )

)

______________________________)

Upon the petition of McGregor W. Scott, United States

Attorney for the Eastern District of California, and the exhibits

thereto,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that respondents JEAN ANNETTE LIASCOS,

LORNE McCAN, V. STEVEN BOOTH, LOUISE Q. BOOTH and JOHN INNIS,

JR., appear before United States District Judge Robert E. Coyle

in Courtroom 1 of the United States Courthouse, 1130 "O" Street,

Fresno, California, on August 22, 2005, at 1:30 p.m. and that

respondents show cause as follows:

1. Why the respondents, JEAN ANNETTE LIASCOS, LORNE McCAN,

V. STEVEN BOOTH, LOUISE Q. BOOTH and JOHN INNIS, JR., should not

be held in civil contempt of this Court for their failure to

comply with the "Orders Deeming Respondent's 'Notice of Appeal of

Magistrate's Findigs [sic] and Recmmendations [sic]' to be

Objections to Findings and Recommendation; Enforcing IRS Summons

and Directing Respondent to Appear on Friday, June 17, 2005 at

[times certain] in Courtroom 5" ("Summons Enforcement Orders").

2. Why the respondents should not be incarcerated and

ordered to pay a daily fine until they comply with the Summons

Case 1:05-cv-00285-REC-DLB Document 37 Filed 07/15/05 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

3

Enforcement Orders, and ordered to pay a compensatory fine to the

United States.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that on or before Monday, August 8,

2005 the respondents shall file and serve a written response to

the "Petition Re: Civil Contempt of Orders filed May 23-25,

2005." Only those issues brought into controversy by the

responsive papers and supported by declaration will be considered

at the hearing on this Order, and any uncontested allegation in

the Petition Re: Civil Contempt will be considered admitted.

Respondents are hereby notified that a failure to comply

with this Order will subject respondents to possible further

sanctions for contempt of Court.

The Clerk shall forward copies of this Order to the

Magistrate Judge, the respondents and the United States Attorney.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 15, 2005 /s/ Robert E. Coyle 

668554 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:05-cv-00285-REC-DLB Document 37 Filed 07/15/05 Page 3 of 3