Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_16-cv-01936/USCOURTS-caed-2_16-cv-01936-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Butte County Jail
Defendant
Elizabeth Hess
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

ELIZABETH HESS,

Plaintiff,

v.

BUTTE COUNTY JAIL,

Defendant.

No. 2:16-cv-1936 CKD P

ORDER AND

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

 On August 22, 2016, plaintiff was ordered to file a completed in forma pauperis 

application and a complaint within thirty days and was cautioned that failure to do so would result 

in dismissal. The thirty day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not responded to the court’s 

order. 

 Although it appears from the file that plaintiff’s copy of the August 22, 2016 order was 

returned to the court, plaintiff was properly served. It is plaintiff’s responsibility to keep the court 

apprised of her current address at all times. Pursuant to Local Rule 182(f), service of documents 

at the record address of the party is fully effective. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court assign a district 

court judge to this case; and 

/////

/////

Case 2:16-cv-01936-WBS-CKD Document 4 Filed 09/28/16 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed. 

 These findings and recommendations will be submitted to the United States District Judge 

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 

after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections 

with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Findings and 

Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time 

may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th 

Cir. 1991). 

Dated: September 28, 2016 

1 

hess1936.frs

 

_____________________________________

CAROLYN K. DELANEY 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

Case 2:16-cv-01936-WBS-CKD Document 4 Filed 09/28/16 Page 2 of 2