Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_16-cv-02397/USCOURTS-caed-2_16-cv-02397-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Samsung Electronics America, Inc.
Defendant
Marletta Stine
Plaintiff

Document Text:

ORDER GRANTING STIP. STAYING 

RESPONSE DEADLINE PENDING MDL 

MOTION, 2:16-CV-02397-MCE-EFB

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ANDREW J. FRACKMAN (pro hac forthcoming)

AMY LAURENDEAU (S.B. #198321)

CARLOS M. LAZATIN (pro hac forthcoming)

HANNAH Y. CHANOINE (pro hac forthcoming)

O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP

Times Square Tower

7 Times Square

New York, New York 10036-6524

Telephone: (212) 326-2000

Facsimile: (212) 326-2061

Attorneys for Defendant

Samsung Electronics America, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SACRAMENTO

MARLETTA STINE, on behalf of herself and 

those similarly situated,

Plaintiff,

v.

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, 

INC.,

Defendant.

Case No. 2:16-cv-02397-MCE-EFB

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION 

STAYING SAMSUNG’S RESPONSE 

DEADLINE PENDING MDL MOTION

This matter comes before the Court on the Parties’ Stipulation Staying Samsung’s 

Response Deadline Pending MDL Motion. The Court has reviewed the evidence in question and, 

good cause appearing, GRANTS the parties’ stipulation.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Samsung’s deadline to response to Stine’s complaint is 

stayed pending further order of the Court. The time for Samsung to response to the complaint by 

answer or Rule 12 motion is hereby extended and continued until 30 days following entry of an 

order by the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation on Stine’s Motion for Transfer of Related 

Case 2:16-cv-02397-MCE-EFB Document 6 Filed 11/03/16 Page 1 of 2
- 2 -

ORDER GRANTING STIP. STAYING 

RESPONSE DEADLINE PENDING MDL 

MOTION, 2:16-CV-02397-MCE-EFB

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Actions to the Central District of California Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407 for Consolidated 

Pretrial Proceedings. This stay of Samsung’s deadline to respond to the complaint is entered 

without prejudice to either party’s ability to later petition the Court to lift the stay.

 IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: November 2, 2016

Case 2:16-cv-02397-MCE-EFB Document 6 Filed 11/03/16 Page 2 of 2