Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-01315/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-01315-7/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
A. Hedgpeth
Respondent
Andre Charles Miloslavich
Petitioner

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1 Petitioner was granted an extension of time to file objections, but none have been

filed. Petitioner did, however, file a request to file a reply brief, which is denied as untimely. 

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ANDRE CHARLES MILOSLAVICH, No. CIV S-07-1315-FCD-CMK-P

Petitioner, 

vs. ORDER

A. HEDGPETH,

Respondent.

 /

Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this petition for a writ of

habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States

Magistrate Judge pursuant to Eastern District of California local rules.

On March 27, 2008, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations

herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice that the parties may file

objections within a specified time. No objections to the findings and recommendations have

been filed.1

/ / /

Case 2:07-cv-01315-FCD-CMK Document 23 Filed 05/20/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be

supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed March 27, 2008, are adopted in

full;

2. Respondent’s motion to dismiss (Doc. 13) is granted; 

3. This action is dismissed; and

4. The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment of dismissal and close

this file. 

DATED: May 19, 2008.

Case 2:07-cv-01315-FCD-CMK Document 23 Filed 05/20/08 Page 2 of 2