Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-06070/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-06070-2/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Kathleen Mendoza-Powers
Respondent
Marco Antonio Quintero Mercado
Petitioner

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MARCO ANTONIO QUINTERO )

MERCADO, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

v. )

)

)

KATHLEEN MENDOZA-POWERS, )

)

)

Respondent. )

)

 )

1:04-cv-06070-OWW-TAG HC 

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND

RECOMMENDATIONS TO DISMISS

AMENDED PETITION (Doc. 15)

ORDER DISMISSING AMENDED PETITION

FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS (Doc. 7)

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT

TO ENTER JUDGMENT

Petitioner Marco Antonio Quintero Mercado (hereinafter “Petitioner”) is a state prisoner

proceeding pro se with a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. 

On July 5, 2005, the Magistrate Judge assigned to the case filed a Report and

Recommendations recommending that the amended petition (Doc. 7) be DISMISSED for failure

to state a cognizable federal claim. (Doc. 15). This Report and Recommendations was served on

all parties and contained notice that any objections were to be filed within thirty days from the

date of service of that order. To date, the parties have not filed timely objections to the Report

and Recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted

a de novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court concludes that

the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendations is supported by the record and proper

Case 1:04-cv-06070-OWW -TAG Document 17 Filed 09/27/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

analysis. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Report and Recommendations filed July 5, 2005 (Doc. 15), is ADOPTED IN

FULL;

2. The amended petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. 7), is DISMISSED; and

3. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to ENTER JUDGMENT and close the file. 

This order terminates the action in its entirety. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 26, 2005 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger 

emm0d6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:04-cv-06070-OWW -TAG Document 17 Filed 09/27/05 Page 2 of 2