Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_20-cv-00172/USCOURTS-azd-2_20-cv-00172-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Michael Anthony Lonigro
Plaintiff
New England Teamsters Trucking Industry Pension Fund
Defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Michael Anthony Lonigro,

Plaintiff,

v. 

New England Teamsters Trucking Industry 

Pension Fund,

Defendant.

No. CV-20-00172-PHX-DLR

ORDER 

Before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration. (Doc. 22.) Plaintiff again 

concedes that he has previously fully litigated these matters against Defendant, but insists 

that he should be able to re-litigate them here. He provides no other bases for 

reconsideration, other than to suggest that the Court rushed its decision because of the 

COVID-19 pandemic. Plaintiff has not asserted that the judgment rests on manifest errors 

of law or fact, produced newly discovered or previously unavailable evidence, suggested 

that an intervening change in controlling law undermines the judgment, or convincingly 

argued that failure to grant his motion to reconsider will cause manifest injustice. See 

Allstate Ins. Co. v. Herron, 634 F.3d 1101, 1111 (9th Cir. 2011). As a result,

//

//

//

//

Case 2:20-cv-00172-DLR Document 23 Filed 04/06/20 Page 1 of 2
- 2 -

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration (Doc. 22) is DENIED.

Dated this 3rd day of April, 2020.

Douglas L. Rayes

United States District Judge

Case 2:20-cv-00172-DLR Document 23 Filed 04/06/20 Page 2 of 2