Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-01881/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-01881-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Carmen Serrano
Plaintiff
Sutter Gould Medical Foundation
Defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

12570873.1 STIPULATION DISMISSING COMPLAINT 

WITH PREJUDICE (F.R.C.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii)) AND 

ORDER

HANSON BRIDGETT LLP

JAHMAL T. DAVIS, SBN 191504

ASHLEY A. BALTAZAR, SBN 284921

425 Market Street, 26th Floor

San Francisco, California 94105

Telephone: (415) 777-3200

Facsimile: (415) 541-9366

Attorneys for Defendant

SUTTER GOULD MEDICAL FOUNDATION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO DIVISION

CARMEN SERRANO,

Plaintiff,

v.

SUTTER GOULD MEDICAL 

FOUNDATION; and DOES 1 through 50,

Defendants.

CASE NO. 2:15−CV−01881−MCE−EFB

STIPULATION DISMISSING 

COMPLAINT WITH PREJUDICE 

(F.R.C.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii)) AND ORDER

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between Plaintiff CARMEN SERRANO and 

Defendant SUTTER GOULD MEDICAL FOUNDATION, by and through their respective 

counsel of record, that the entire above-captioned action be dismissed with prejudice. 

/ / /

/ / /

/ / /

/ / /

/ / /

/ / /

/ / /

/ / /

/ / /

Case 2:15-cv-01881-MCE-EFB Document 10 Filed 09/19/16 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

12570873.1 -2- STIPULATION DISMISSING COMPLAINT 

WITH PREJUDICE (F.R.C.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii))

See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) (requiring stipulation for voluntary dismissals after 

responsive pleadings have been filed.) 

IT IS HEREBY SO AGREED. 

DATED: July ___, 2016 CRABTREE SCHMIDT

By:

MICHAEL DENNIS

Attorneys for Plaintiff CARMEN SERRANO

DATED: July ___, 2016 HANSON BRIDGETT LLP

By:

JAHMAL T. DAVIS

ASHLEY A. BALTAZAR

Attorneys for Defendant

SUTTER GOULD MEDICAL FOUNDATION

ORDER

Pursuant to the parties’ stipulation, the Complaint and any and all claims for relief 

in the above-captioned matter, U.S.D.C. E.D. Cal. Case No. 

2:15−CV−01881−MCE−EFB, are hereby DISMISSED with prejudice. The Clerk of the 

Court is directed to close this case. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: September 17, 2016

Case 2:15-cv-01881-MCE-EFB Document 10 Filed 09/19/16 Page 2 of 2