Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-03502/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-03502-9/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Regmon L. Hawkins
Plaintiff
IPC International Corp.
Defendant
S2Verify
Defendant

Document Text:

1 

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE HEARING AND EXTEND DEADLINE FOR REPLY 

2172171.2 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Brian H. Gunn (SBN 192594) 

bhgunn@wolfewyman.com 

Andrew A. Bao (SBN 247092) 

aabao@wolfewyman.com 

WOLFE & WYMAN LLP

2175 N. California Blvd., Suite 645 

Walnut Creek, California 94596-3502 

Telephone: (925) 280-0004 

Facsimile: (925) 280-0005 

Attorneys for Defendant 

S2VERIFY 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

REGMON L. HAWKINS, on behalf of himself and 

all others similarly situated, 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

S2VERIFY, a foreign limited liability company, 

and IPC INTERNATIONAL CORP., a foreign 

corporation, 

 Defendants. 

 Case No.: 3:15-cv-03502 WHA 

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE HEARING 

ON S2VERIFY’S MOTION TO DISMISS 

AND EXTEND DEADLINE FOR 

DEFENDANT TO FILE A REPLY UNDER 

CIVIL LOCAL RULE 6-2 

Hon. William H. Alsup 

Action Filed: 06/16/2015 

Trial Date: None set. 

TO THE COURT AND ALL PARTIES AND/OR THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD: 

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-2, Defendant S2VERIFY (“Defendant” and/or “S2V”) and 

Plaintiff REGMON L. HAWKINS (“Plaintiff”) (collectively referred to as “Parties”) hereby 

stipulate as follows: 

RECITALS 

WHEREAS, Defendant S2V currently has a Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s First Amended 

Complaint set for hearing on December 24, 2015; 

WHEREAS, Plaintiff filed his response to S2V’s Motion to Dismiss on November 30, 2015; 

WHEREAS, S2V’s reply to Plaintiff’s response is currently due on December 7, 2015. 

Case 3:15-cv-03502-WHA Document 49 Filed 12/07/15 Page 1 of 4
2 

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE HEARING AND EXTEND DEADLINE FOR REPLY 

2172171.2 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WHEREAS, the Parties’ counsel of record have agreed to continue the hearing date on S2V’s 

Motion to Dismiss to January 7, 2016; 

WHEREAS, this stipulation will not alter the date of any other event or deadline already 

fixed by the court. 

STIPULATION 

Pursuant to Local Rule 6-2, the Parties hereby stipulate that: 

1. The hearing date on Defendant S2V’s Motion to Dismiss be continued to January 7, 

2016; and 

2. Defendant S2V shall have until December 14, 2015 to file a reply to Plaintiff’s 

response to the Motion to Dismiss. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

DATED: December 7, 2015 WOLFE & WYMAN LLP 

By: /s/ Andrew A. Bao SBN 247092

BRIAN H. GUNN 

ANDREW A. BAO 

Attorneys for Defendant 

S2VERIFY 

DATED: December 7, 2015 CADDELL & CHAPMAN 

By: /s/ Michael A. Caddell (w/authorization)

MICHAEL A. CADDELL 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

REGMON L. HAWKINS 

Case 3:15-cv-03502-WHA Document 49 Filed 12/07/15 Page 2 of 4
3 

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE HEARING AND EXTEND DEADLINE FOR REPLY 

2172171.2 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DECLARATION OF ANDREW BAO 

I, ANDREW BAO, declare: 

1. I am an attorney with the firm of Wolfe & Wyman LLP, attorneys of record 

Defendant S2Verify (“S2V”) and I am licensed to practice before the U.S. District Court, 

Northern District of California. The matters set forth in this declaration are within my 

personal knowledge, and if called upon to testify, I could and would competently testify 

thereto. 

2. On November 16, 2015, I caused to be filed a FRCP Rule 12(b)(6) Motion to 

Dismiss Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint (“Motion”). The hearing was set for December 

24, 2015. Plaintiff filed the Opposition to the Motion on November 30, 2015. S2V’s reply 

brief is due on or before December 7, 2015. 

3. On December 4, 2015, I contacted Plaintiff’s counsel of record to request a 2 

court day extension to file the reply brief to December 9, 2015. The reason for seeking this 

brief extension was to accommodate a scheduling conflict. Plaintiff’s counsel of record 

advised that he would provide an extension to file if we moved the December 24, 2015 

hearing date. Given that December 24, 2015 is Christmas Eve and the court is dark on 

December 31, 2015, Plaintiff’s counsel of record and I agreed to continue the Motion hearing 

date until January 7, 2015 , the next available court date to hear civil motions. 

4. Defendant has not previously sought any modification of the December 24, 

2015 hearing. However, the Parties have previously filed several stipulations relating to the 

pleadings in this matter (Docket Doc. No. 16, 26, 30). I do not believe this stipulation will 

effect any other future dates or deadlines already set by the Court. 

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States that the foregoing is 

true and correct to the best of my knowledge. Executed this 7th day of December, 2015 at Walnut 

Creek, California. 

 /s/ Andrew A. Bao SBN 247092 

 ANDREW A. BAO 

Case 3:15-cv-03502-WHA Document 49 Filed 12/07/15 Page 3 of 4
ORDER ON STIPULATION TO CONTINUE HEARING AND EXTEND DEADLINE 

2172171.2 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER 

The Court, having reviewed the Stipulation to Continue Hearing Date and Extend Deadline 

for Reply, and good cause appearing therefore, makes the following Order: 

1. The hearing date on Defendant S2V’s Motion to Dismiss be continued to January 7, 

2016; and 

2. Defendant S2V shall have until December 14, 2015 to file a reply to Plaintiff’s 

response to the Motion to Dismiss. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: __________________ ____________________________________________ 

U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 

December 7, 2015.

Case 3:15-cv-03502-WHA Document 49 Filed 12/07/15 Page 4 of 4