Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ared-5_14-cv-00309/USCOURTS-ared-5_14-cv-00309-3/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Nicholas Davis
Plaintiff
Artis Ray Hobbs
Defendant

Document Text:

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS 

PINE BLUFF DIVISION 

NICHOLAS DAVIS 

ADC#128996 

v. No. 5:14-cv-309-DPM-JTR 

ARTIS RAY HOBBS, Director, ADC 

ORDER 

PETITIONER 

RESPONDENT 

Motion to reconsider, NQ 15, granted. Davis's belated objections, NQ 14, 

do not raise anything new. They' re overruled. On de novo review, the Court 

again adopts the recommended decision but adds one modification. The oneyear limitations period began on 5 September 2003 and ran before Davis filed 

his petition. Gonzales v. Thaler, 131 S. Ct. 641, 656 (2012); Camacho v. Hobbs, 774 

F.3d 931, 934-35 (8th Cir. 2015). 

So Ordered. 

Case 5:14-cv-00309-DPM Document 16 Filed 02/19/15 Page 1 of 1