Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-03094/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-03094-3/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Intel Corporation
Defendant
Karol Juskiewicz
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE RESPONSE DATE 

SF/21630890.1

Bingham McCutchen LLP 

DAVID M. BALABANIAN (SBN 37368) 

CHRISTOPHER B. HOCKETT (SBN 121539) 

JOY K. FUYUNO (SBN 193890) 

Three Embarcadero Center 

San Francisco, CA 94111-4067 

Telephone: (415) 393-2000 

Facsimile: (415) 393-2286 

Attorneys for Defendant 

Intel Corporation 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

KAROL JUSKIEWICZ, on behalf of himself and 

all others similarly situated, 

Plaintiff, 

v.

INTEL CORPORATION, a Delaware 

corporation,

Defendant.

No. C-05-3094-BZ 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER TO CONTINUE FILING DATE 

FOR DEFENDANT’S RESPONSE TO 

PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT 

IT IS STIPULATED BY AND BETWEEN THE PARTIES, THROUGH THEIR 

COUNSEL AS FOLLOWS: 

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-2, Plaintiff Karol Juskiewicz and Defendant Intel 

Corporation hereby stipulate that Intel Corporation’s response to Plaintiff’s complaint shall be 

due either 60 days after transfer of the above captioned case pursuant to any motion to coordinate 

or consolidate pre-trial proceedings per 28 U.S.C. Section 1407 or, in the alternative, 45 days 

after any such motion has been denied. The parties request this extension of time to answer or 

otherwise respond because the plaintiffs in Brauch, et al. v. Intel Corp., No. C 05-2743 (BZ) 

Case 3:05-cv-03094-JSW Document 10 Filed 08/17/2005 Page 1 of 3

JSW

Case 3:05-cv-03094-MHP Document 11 Filed 08/18/05 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE RESPONSE DATE 

SF/21630890.1

(N.D. Cal., filed July 5, 2005), a related matter, have filed a petition to coordinate or consolidate 

pre-trial proceedings per 28 U.S.C. Section 1407, and the above-styled action has been identified 

as a related action to that petition. As a result the outcome of the pending petition will impact 

significantly the schedule of this case. 

This is the first stipulation between the parties. Because this litigation has just 

begun, granting such a stipulation will not have any negative impact on the schedule of this case. 

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED. 

DATED: August 11, 2005 

Bingham McCutchen LLP 

By: /s/ Joy K. Fuyuno

JOY K. FUYUNO 

Attorneys for Defendant 

Intel Corporation 

DATED: August 16, 2005 

Trump, Alioto, Trump and Prescott 

By: /s/ Mario N. Alioto

MARIO N. ALIOTO 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

Karol Juskiewicz 

Case 3:05-cv-03094-JSW Document 10 Filed 08/17/2005 Page 2 of 3 Case 3:05-cv-03094-MHP Document 11 Filed 08/18/05 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

3

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE RESPONSE DATE 

SF/21630890.1

[PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE DEFENDANT’S RESPONSE DATE

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant Intel Corporation’s response to 

Plaintiff’s complaint shall be due either 60 days after transfer of the above captioned case 

pursuant to any motion to coordinate or consolidate pre-trial proceedings per 28 U.S.C. Section 

1407, or, in the alternative, 45 days after any such motion has been denied. 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: August ___, 2005 

_________________________

Honorable Bernard Zimmerman 

United States Magistrate Judge 

Case 3:05-cv-03094-JSW Document 10 Filed 08/17/2005 Page 3 of 3

18

Honorable Jeffrey S. White

United States District Court Judge

Case 3:05-cv-03094-MHP Document 11 Filed 08/18/05 Page 3 of 3