Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_21-cv-00386/USCOURTS-caed-2_21-cv-00386-3/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
City of Anderson
Defendant
Kameron Lee
Defendant
Therese L. Lesher
Plaintiff
Jeffrey Miley
Defendant
Sean Miller
Defendant

Document Text:

Stipulation and Order for the Filing of a Second Amended Complaint

Lesher v. City of Anderson, et al.

USDC (E.D. Cal.) Case No.: 2:21-cv-00386-WBS-DMC 1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Sanjay S. Schmidt (SBN 247475)

LAW OFFICE OF SANJAY S. SCHMIDT

1388 Sutter Street, Suite 810

San Francisco, CA 94109

Tel. (415) 563-8583

Fax (415) 223-9717

e-mail: ss@sanjayschmidtlaw.com 

Panos Lagos (SBN 61821)

LAW OFFICES OF PANOS LAGOS

5032 Woodminster Lane

Oakland, CA 94602 

Tel. (510) 530-4078

Fax (510) 530-4725

e-mail: panos@panoslagoslaw.com 

Attorneys for Plaintiff, 

THERESE L. LESHER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

THERESE L. LESHER,

Plaintiff,

vs.

CITY OF ANDERSON, a municipal 

corporation; City of Anderson Police Sergeant

SEAN MILLER, individually, City of 

Anderson Police Officers JEFFREY MILEY, 

individually, and KAMERON LEE, 

individually; and, DOES 1 through 50, jointly 

and severally,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 2:21-cv-00386-WBS-DMC

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR THE 

FILING OF A SECOND AMENDED 

COMPLAINT

Case 2:21-cv-00386-WBS-DMC Document 27 Filed 08/27/21 Page 1 of 3
Stipulation and Order for the Filing of a Second Amended Complaint

Lesher v. City of Anderson, et al.

USDC (E.D. Cal.) Case No.: 2:21-cv-00386-WBS-DMC 2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WHEREAS, Defendant City of Anderson has moved to dismiss claim four in Plaintiff’s 

First Amended Complaint, the Monell claim. ECF Nos. 24, 24-1, and 24-2.

WHEREAS, Defendant City of Anderson noticed its motion to be heard on September 

20, 2021.

WHEREAS, the undersigned Plaintiff’s counsel notified counsel for Defendant City of 

Anderson shortly after the filing of its motion that counsel is unavailable on that date.

WHEREAS, the undersigned Plaintiff’s counsel has also met-and-conferred with counsel 

for Defendant City of Anderson regarding its motion, and Plaintiff has decided to omit certain 

claims that are at issue in the pending motion, in order to streamline the litigation and narrow 

down the issues to be decided. This can be accomplished most efficiently with the filing a 

Second Amended Complaint.

This stipulation and the filing of a Second Amended Complaint will advance the interest 

of judicial economy by narrowing down the issues to be litigated. If Defendant City of Anderson 

elects to again move to dismiss Plaintiff’s Monell claim, under Rule 12(b)(6), the issues to be 

briefed and decided by the Court will be narrowed down.

If this stipulation is granted, Plaintiff’s ensuing Second Amended Complaint will render 

Defendant City of Anderson’s pending Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss, ECF Nos. 24, 24-1, and 

24-2, moot. This will address the calendar conflict issue and obviate the need to reschedule the 

hearing on this motion.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties through their 

respective attorneys of record, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a)(2), that 

Plaintiff, not later than September 5, 2021, may file a Second Amended Complaint.

IT IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD.

//

//

//

//

//

Case 2:21-cv-00386-WBS-DMC Document 27 Filed 08/27/21 Page 2 of 3
Stipulation and Order for the Filing of a Second Amended Complaint

Lesher v. City of Anderson, et al.

USDC (E.D. Cal.) Case No.: 2:21-cv-00386-WBS-DMC 3

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Respectfully Submitted,

Dated: August 26, 2021 LAW OFFICE OF SANJAY S. SCHMIDT

-andLAW OFFICES OF PANOS LAGOS

/s/ Sanjay S. Schmidt

By: Sanjay S. Schmidt

Attorneys for Plaintiff,

THERESE L. LESHER

Dated: August 26, 2021 ANGELO, KILDAY & KILDUFF, LLP

/s/ Gökalp Y. Gürer* (authorized on 08/24/21)

By: Gökalp Y. Gürer

DERICK E. KONZ 

GÖKALP Y. GÜRER

Attorneys for Defendants CITY OF ANDERSON, 

SEAN MILLER, JEFFREY MILEY, and 

KAMERON LEE

*Pursuant to Local Rule 131(e), counsel has authorized submission of this document on counsel’s 

behalf.

ORDER

GOOD CAUSE having been shown, the foregoing stipulation for Plaintiff to file a 

Second Amended Complaint is HEREBY GRANTED. Plaintiff shall file a Second Amended 

Complaint on or before September 5, 2021, which will render the pending Rule 12(b)(6) motion 

moot; as such, upon the filing of Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint, the pending September 

20, 2021 motion hearing date is vacated. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 26, 2021

Case 2:21-cv-00386-WBS-DMC Document 27 Filed 08/27/21 Page 3 of 3