Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-15-02523/USCOURTS-ca4-15-02523-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Jacqueline Ann Berrien

Nannette F. Buckner
Appellant
Mariam G. Garvey

Timothy F. Geithner

Robert L. Hunt

Jacob Lew
Appellee

Document Text:

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-2523

NANNETTE F. BUCKNER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

JACOB LEW, Secretary, Department of the Treasury,

Defendant – Appellee, 

and

TIMOTHY F. GEITHNER, Secretary, Department of the Treasury; 

MARIAM G. GARVEY, Department of the Treasury; JACQUELINE ANN 

BERRIEN; ROBERT L. HUNT, Area Director, South Atlantic Area, 

Collections Operations,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, 

District Judge. (5:13-cv-00199-FL)

Submitted: April 19, 2016 Decided: September 2, 2016

Before AGEE, DIAZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Appeal: 15-2523 Doc: 10 Filed: 09/02/2016 Pg: 1 of 3
2

Nannette F. Buckner, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Gordon James, 

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 15-2523 Doc: 10 Filed: 09/02/2016 Pg: 2 of 3
3

PER CURIAM:

Nannette F. Buckner appeals the district court’s order 

accepting in part and rejecting in part the magistrate judge’s 

recommendation, and granting Defendant’s motion for summary 

judgment in Buckner’s employment discrimination action. Buckner 

also appeals the district court’s order denying her motion for 

reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no 

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated 

by the district court. Buckner v. Lew, No. 5:13-cv-00199-FL 

(E.D.N.C. Sept. 30, 2015 & Nov. 2, 2015). We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before this court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Appeal: 15-2523 Doc: 10 Filed: 09/02/2016 Pg: 3 of 3