Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-02112/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-02112-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Youssef Boulaalam
Plaintiff
County of Mono
Defendant
Richard Hahn
Defendant
Arturo Torres
Defendant

Document Text:

Stipulated Application for Order Allowing Plaintiff to File a First Amended Complaint; Granting Defendants Thirty Days to 

Respond Thereto; and Allowing Defendants’ Pending Motion to Dismiss Portions of Plaintiff’s Complaint to be Dropped from 

the Court’s Calendar Without Prejudice to it Being Rescheduled for Hearing (Local Rule 144); Order

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Allen Berrey SBN 119267

Law Office of Allen Berrey

1613 Washoe Circle

Bishop, CA 93514

Phone: 760-920-1399

Email: arberrey@gmail.com

Ben Williams SBN 284884

Jesse Ortiz Law

980 9th Street Suite 340

Sacramento, CA 95814

Phone: 916-443-9500

Email: ben@jesseortizlaw.com

Attorneys for Plaintiff

YOUSSEF BOULAALAM

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

YOUSSEF BOULAALAM,

Plaintiff,

vs.

COUNTY OF MONO, CALIFORNIA;

MONO COUNTY SHERIFF’S SERGEANT 

RICHARD HAHN; MONO COUNTY 

SHERIFF’S DEPUTY ARTURO TORRES; IN 

THEIR INDIVIDUAL CAPACITIES, AND 

DOES 1-100, inclusive,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

NO. 2:14-CV-02112-MCE-EFB

STIPULATED APPLICATION FOR

ORDER ALLOWING PLAINTIFF TO 

FILE A FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT; 

GRANTING DEFENDANTS THIRTY 

DAYS TO RESPOND THERETO; AND 

ALLOWING DEFENDANTS’ PENDING 

MOTION TO DISMISS PORTIONS OF 

PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT TO BE 

DROPPPED FROM THE COURT’S 

CALENDAR WITHOUT PREJUDICE TO 

IT BEING RESCHEDULED FOR 

HEARING (LOCAL RULE 144); ORDER

Pursuant to Local Rule 144, the parties hereto, by and through their respective 

undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate as follows:

1. In lieu of filing a response to Defendant’s pending Motion to Dismiss Portions of 

Plaintiff’s Complaint, Plaintiff will file a first amended complaint by May 15, 2015.

Case 2:14-cv-02112-MCE-EFB Document 13 Filed 04/24/15 Page 1 of 3
Stipulated Application for Order Allowing Plaintiff to File a First Amended Complaint; Granting Defendants Thirty Days to 

Respond Thereto; and Allowing Defendants’ Pending Motion to Dismiss Portions of Plaintiff’s Complaint to be Dropped from 

the Court’s Calendar Without Prejudice to it Being Rescheduled for Hearing (Local Rule 144); Order

2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2. Defendants shall have thirty days after service to respond to the first amended 

complaint.

3. Defendants’ pending Motion to Dismiss Portions of Plaintiff’s Complaint may be 

dropped from the Court’s calendar without prejudice to Defendants’ right to reschedule it for 

hearing in the event Plaintiff fails to file an amended complaint.

Date: April 16, 2015 Law Office of Allen Berrey 

By:/s/Allen Berrey

 Allen Berrey

Date: April 16, 2015 Jesse Ortiz Law

By:/s/Ben Williams

 Ben Williams

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

Date: April 16, 2015 Bolling & Gawthrop

 By:/s/Marjorie E. Manning

 Marjorie E. Manning

Attorneys for Defendants

ORDER

Pursuant to the parties’ stipulation:

1. In lieu of filing a response to Defendant’s pending Motion to Dismiss Portions of 

Plaintiff’s Complaint, Plaintiff will file a first amended complaint by May 15, 2015.

2. Defendants shall have thirty days after service to respond to the first amended 

complaint.

3. Defendants’ pending Motion to Dismiss Portions of Plaintiff’s Complaint is be 

dropped from the Court’s calendar without prejudice to Defendants’ right to reschedule it for 

hearing in the event Plaintiff fails to file an amended complaint.

Case 2:14-cv-02112-MCE-EFB Document 13 Filed 04/24/15 Page 2 of 3
Stipulated Application for Order Allowing Plaintiff to File a First Amended Complaint; Granting Defendants Thirty Days to 

Respond Thereto; and Allowing Defendants’ Pending Motion to Dismiss Portions of Plaintiff’s Complaint to be Dropped from 

the Court’s Calendar Without Prejudice to it Being Rescheduled for Hearing (Local Rule 144); Order

3

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

4. The hearing on Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss, currently scheduled for May 15, 2015, 

is hereby VACATED.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: April 23, 2015

Case 2:14-cv-02112-MCE-EFB Document 13 Filed 04/24/15 Page 3 of 3