Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_23-cv-00509/USCOURTS-caed-2_23-cv-00509-5/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Patrick J. Booth
Plaintiff
Dawn Santos
Defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

PATRICK J. BOOTH,

Plaintiff,

v.

DAWN SANTOS,

Defendant.

No. 2:23-cv-0509 CKD P

ORDER AND 

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

A recent court order was served on plaintiff’s address of record and returned by the Postal 

Service. It appears plaintiff has failed to comply with Local Rule 182(f), which requires that a 

party appearing in propria persona inform the court of any address change.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court assign a district 

court judge to this case; and

IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed for plaintiff’s failure to 

keep the court apprised of his current address. See Local Rules 182(f) and 110.

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 

after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections 

with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings 

and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified 

Case 2:23-cv-00509-DAD-CKD Document 18 Filed 12/03/24 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 

(9th Cir. 1991).

Dated: December 3, 2024

1

boot0509.133a

_____________________________________

CAROLYN K. DELANEY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:23-cv-00509-DAD-CKD Document 18 Filed 12/03/24 Page 2 of 2