Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-07-07057/USCOURTS-ca4-07-07057-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Matt Abott
Appellee
Ms. Brown
Appellee
Thomas R. Corcoran
Appellee
John Doe
Appellee
L. Dotson
Appellee
Frank Sizer
Appellee
Sewell B. Smith
Appellee
William Williams
Appellee
Curtis Wright
Appellant

Document Text:

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-7057

CURTIS WRIGHT,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

FRANK SIZER, Former Division of Corrections Commissioner; THOMAS

R. CORCORAN, Former Warden of Maryland Correctional Adjustment

Center; SEWELL B. SMITH, Former Warden of Maryland Correctional

Adjustment Center; WILLIAM WILLIAMS, Former Warden of Maryland

Correctional Adjustment Center, and Maryland House of

Correction; L. DOTSON, My knowledge of him being Warden of

Maryland Correctional Adjustment Center on 8/24/04; MATT ABOTT;

MS. BROWN, Counselor at Maryland House of Corrections; JOHN DOE,

Warden of Maryland House of Correction to my knowledge during

the month of August 2006,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. William D. Quarles, Jr., District Judge.

(1:06-cv-03078-WDQ)

Submitted: February 28, 2008 Decided: March 5, 2008

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Curtis Wright, Appellant Pro Se. Stephanie Judith Lane Weber,

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland,

for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 07-7057 Doc: 19 Filed: 03/05/2008 Pg: 1 of 2
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Curtis Wright appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed

the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm

for the reasons stated by the district court. See Wright v. Sizer,

No. 1:06-cv-03078-WDQ (D. Md. July 2, 2007). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Appeal: 07-7057 Doc: 19 Filed: 03/05/2008 Pg: 2 of 2