Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-01512/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-01512-3/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
2005 Harley Davidson Street Glide Motorcycle, VIN: 1HD1FVW375Y618635,
Defendant
2007 Harley Davidson FLTR Road Glide Motorcycle, VIN: 1HD1FS4397Y630807,
Defendant
2010 Chevrolet Camaro SS, VIN: 2G1FT1EW3A9148874, California License
Defendant
2012 Harley Davidson FLTRX Road Glide Motorcycle, VIN:
Defendant
Kevin Lamar Hunt
Claimant
United States of America
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

Stipulation and Order for Dismissal

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

2012 HARLEY DAVIDSON FLTRX ROAD 

GLIDE MOTORCYCLE, VIN: 

1HD1KGM3XCB636315, CALIFORNIA 

LICENSE NUMBER: 20X8247, 

2005 HARLEY DAVIDSON STREET GLIDE 

MOTORCYCLE, VIN: 

1HD1FVW375Y618635, CALIFORNIA 

LICENSE NUMBER: 19V7740, 

2007 HARLEY DAVIDSON FLTR ROAD 

GLIDE MOTORCYCLE, VIN: 

1HD1FS4397Y630807, CALIFORNIA 

LICENSE NUMBER: WISGUY5, and

2010 CHEVROLET CAMARO SS, VIN: 

2G1FT1EW3A9148874, CALIFORNIA 

LICENSE NUMBER: 6TZD882,

Defendants.

2:14−CV−01512−TLN−AC

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR 

DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE; 

CERTIFICATE OF REASONABLE 

CAUSE

It is hereby stipulated by and between the United States of America and claimant Kevin 

Lamar Hunt (“claimant”), by and through their respective counsel of record, as follows:

1. The pending action shall be dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(a)(2) of the

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

KEVIN C. KHASIGIAN

Assistant U. S. Attorney

501 I Street, Suite 10-100

Sacramento, CA 95814

Telephone: (916) 554-2700

Attorneys for the United States

Case 2:14-cv-01512-TLN-AC Document 14 Filed 05/29/15 Page 1 of 2
2

Stipulation and Order for Dismissal

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 

2. The parties are to bear their own costs and attorney fees.

3. There was probable cause for the commencement and prosecution of this forfeiture 

action, and the Court may enter a Certificate of Reasonable Cause pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2465.

Dated: 5/22/2015 BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

By: /s/ Kevin C. Khasigian

KEVIN C. KHASIGIAN

Assistant U.S. Attorney

Dated: 5/22/2015

/s/ Patrick K. Hanly

PATRICK K. HANLY

Attorney for Claimant Kevin Lamar Hunt

(As authorized via email)

IT IS SO ORDERED.

CERTIFICATE OF REASONABLE CAUSE

The action is dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule 41(a)(2) and the United 

States shall take all reasonable steps to return the defendant assets to the claimant within thirty days.

Based upon the allegations set forth in the Complaint for Forfeiture In Rem filed June 25, 

2014, and the Stipulation for Dismissal With Prejudice filed herewith, the Court enters this 

Certificate of Reasonable Cause pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2465, that there was reasonable cause for 

the commencement of this forfeiture action.

Dated: May 28, 2015

Case 2:14-cv-01512-TLN-AC Document 14 Filed 05/29/15 Page 2 of 2