Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_09-cv-03163/USCOURTS-caed-2_09-cv-03163-3/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Frank G. Alverez
Petitioner
Michael Martel
Respondent

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

FRANK G. ALVEREZ,

Petitioner, No.2:09-cv-3163-JAM-JFM

vs.

MICHAEL MARTEL,

Respondent. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

On March 26, 2010, petitioner was ordered to show cause, within twenty days,

why his action should not be dismissed. The twenty day period has now expired, and petitioner

has not shown cause or otherwise responded to the court’s order.

IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without

prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty

days after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written

objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned

“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Any reply to the objections

shall be served and filed within ten days after service of the objections. The parties are advised

Case 2:09-cv-03163-JAM -JFM Document 14 Filed 06/09/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District

Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: June 8, 2010.

/014.alve3163.fsc.hab

Case 2:09-cv-03163-JAM -JFM Document 14 Filed 06/09/10 Page 2 of 2