Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-01690/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-01690-2/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
DSD Solutions Inc.
Defendant
Destined Design
Defendant
Microsoft Corporation
Plaintiff
Duy L. Pan
Defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 STIPULATION TO EXTEND DISCOVERY AND 

MOTION DEADLINES

CASE NO. 15CV-01690 MCE CKD

41826-5600.0146/130542545.1

Audra M. Mori, Bar No. 162850

AMori@perkinscoie.com

Katherine M. Dugdale, Bar No. 168014

KDugdale@perkinscoie.com

PERKINS COIE LLP

1888 Century Park E., Suite 1700

Los Angeles, CA 90067-1721

Telephone: 310.788.9900

Facsimile: 310.788.3399

Attorneys for Plaintiff

MICROSOFT CORPORATION

CURTIS R. TINGLEY (SBN 112322)

ctingley@tingleylawgroup.com

STEPHEN D. COLLINS (SBN 277482)

scollins@tingleylawgroup.com

KEVIN W. ISAACSON (SBN 281067)

kisaacson@tingleylawgroup.com

TINGLEY LAW GROUP, PC

10 Almaden Boulevard, Suite 960

San Jose, California 95113

Telephone: (408) 283-7000

Facsimile: (408) 283-7010

Attorneys for Defendants

DSD SOLUTIONS INC. and DUY L. PAN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SACRAMENTO DIVISION

MICROSOFT CORPORATION,

a Washington corporation,

Plaintiff,

v.

DSD SOLUTIONS INC., a California 

corporation dba DESTINED DESIGN; 

DUY L. PAN, an individual; and DOES 1-5,

Defendants.

CASE NO. 15CV-01690 MCE CKD

STIPULATION TO EXTEND 

DISCOVERY AND MOTION

DEADLINES; ORDER

Defendants DSD SOLUTIONS INC. and DUY L. PAN (hereinafter “Defendants”) and 

Plaintiff MICROSOFT CORPORATION (hereinafter “Plaintiff”) (Plaintiff and Defendants are 

Case 2:15-cv-01690-MCE-CKD Document 18 Filed 04/13/16 Page 1 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 - 2 - STIPULATION TO EXTEND DISCOVERY AND 

MOTION DEADLINES

CASE NO. 15CV-01690 MCE CKD

41826-5600.0146/130542545.1

hereinafter collectively referred to as the “Parties”), by and through their counsel of record, 

hereby stipulate and agree as follows: 

WHEREAS, on December 14, 2015, the Court issued a Scheduling Order which included

the following deadlines:

Discovery Cut-Off Date April 4, 2016

Deadline for Initial Designation of Expert 

Witnesses

June 3, 2016

Deadline for Designation of Rebuttal Expert 

Witnesses

July 5, 2016

Dispositive Motion Hearing Cut-Off Date September 29, 2016

Final Pretrial Conference Statement January 26, 2017

Final Pretrial Conference February 16, 2017

Trial April 2, 2017

WHEREAS, Defendants and Defendants’ insurance carrier are engaged in an ongoing

dispute regarding the scope of Defendants’ insurance coverage;

WHEREAS, pending the resolution of the ongoing dispute regarding the scope of 

Defendants’ insurance coverage, Defendants’ insurance carrier will not participate in this action 

in any way, including attendance at any mediation;

WHEREAS, it does not appear that the dispute between Defendants and their insurer 

regarding coverage will be resolved by the week of April 18, 2016, when Plaintiff and Defendants 

had agreed to mediate the instant copyright and trademark infringement case;

WHEREAS, the Parties agree that they will participate in a mediation prior to the 

Discovery Cut-Off;

WHEREAS, the Parties agree that an additional 44 days to do discovery will allow (1) 

Defendants to have time to resolve their insurance dispute; (2) the Parties to conserve resources 

by staying written discovery between them until mediation can take place; (3) the Parties to 

participate in a meaningful mediation, which will maximize the possibility of settlement and 

Case 2:15-cv-01690-MCE-CKD Document 18 Filed 04/13/16 Page 2 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 - 3 - STIPULATION TO EXTEND DISCOVERY AND 

MOTION DEADLINES

CASE NO. 15CV-01690 MCE CKD

41826-5600.0146/130542545.1

serve judicial economy; and (4) the Parties to do additional discovery in the event that they are 

unable to reach an amicable resolution at the mediation;

WHEREAS, the Parties have made one prior request to the Court for an extension of the 

fact Discovery Cut-Off due to Defendants’ insurance coverage dispute, which the Court granted;

WHEREAS, the Parties have not requested previously and are not requesting now a 

continuance of the pretrial conference or trial dates;

///

///

///

///

///

///

///

///

///

///

///

///

///

///

///

///

///

///

///

///

///

///

Case 2:15-cv-01690-MCE-CKD Document 18 Filed 04/13/16 Page 3 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 - 4 - STIPULATION TO EXTEND DISCOVERY AND 

MOTION DEADLINES

CASE NO. 15CV-01690 MCE CKD

41826-5600.0146/130542545.1

GOOD CAUSE is hereby shown, and IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the 

Parties, that the following continuance be effectuated: 

Current Date Proposed Date

Discovery Cut-Off May 25, 2016 July 8, 2016

Deadline for Initial Designation 

of Expert Witnesses (Per FRCP 

26)

June 3, 2016 July 15, 2016

Deadline for Designation of 

Rebuttal Expert Witnesses

July 5, 2016 August 12, 2016

Dispositive Motion Hearing CutOff September 29, 2016 November 18, 2016

Dated: April 8, 2016 TINGLEY LAW GROUP, PC

By: /s/ Stephen Collins 

 (as authorized on 4/8/2016).

STEPHEN D. COLLINS

Attorneys for Defendants

Dated: April 8, 2016 PERKINS COIE LLP

By: /s/ Audra M. Mori

Audra M. Mori

Attorneys for Plaintiff

MICROSOFT CORPORATION

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 12, 2016

Case 2:15-cv-01690-MCE-CKD Document 18 Filed 04/13/16 Page 4 of 4