Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-10-06049/USCOURTS-ca4-10-06049-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Donald James Hurlbert
Appellant
Reginald I. Lloyd
Appellee
State of South Carolina

Document Text:

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-6049

DONALD JAMES HURLBERT,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

REGINALD I. LLOYD, Director SLED,

Defendant – Appellee,

and

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA,

Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Beaufort. Patrick Michael Duffy, Senior 

District Judge. (9:09-cv-00241-PMD)

Submitted: March 16, 2010 Decided: March 24, 2010

Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Donald James Hurlbert, Appellant Pro Se. Christopher Todd 

Hagins, SOUTH CAROLINA LAW ENFORCEMENT DIVISION, Columbia, South 

Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 10-6049 Doc: 5 Filed: 03/24/2010 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Donald James Hurlbert appeals the district court’s 

order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and 

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We 

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district 

court. Hurlbert v. Lloyd, No. 9:09-cv-00241-PMD (D.S.C. Dec. 2, 

2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

AFFIRMED

Appeal: 10-6049 Doc: 5 Filed: 03/24/2010 Pg: 2 of 2