Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-00495/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-00495-5/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Mark Chinen
Defendant
City of Oakland
Defendant
Faeth
Defendant
Shawn Wrigley
Plaintiff

Document Text:

SECOND STIPULATION TO AMEND COMPLAINT - 1 –

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Wayne Johnson, SBN: 112588

Law Offices of Wayne Johnson

P.O. Box 19157

Oakland, CA 94619

(510) 451-1166

Attorney for Plaintiffs

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SHAWN WRIGLEY, CIVIL NO: C06-00495

PLAINTIFF, SECOND STIPULATION TO AMEND

COMPLAINT AND ORDER

v.

SGT. FAETH, AND OFFICER MARK CHINEN,

INDIVIDUALLY, AND IN THEIR

CAPACITIES AS EMPLOYEES OF THE CITY

OF OAKLAND, THE CITY OF OAKLAND,

AND DOES 1-10, POLICE OFFICERS WHOSE

 NAMES ARE UNKNOWN,

DEFENDANT.

__________________________________________/

1. Plaintiff, Shawn Wrigley, hereby amends the complaint as follows:

In the caption, THE CITY OF OAKLAND should be added as a defendant.

In paragraph 12 of the complaint, Officer Mark Chinen shall be substituted in place and

instead of M. Rowley.

It is so stipulated.

DATED: May 31, 2006 LAW OFFICES OF WAYNE JOHNSON

S/ ____________________________

WAYNE JOHNSON

Attorney for Plaintiff

Case 3:06-cv-00495-MJJ Document 19 Filed 06/02/2006 Page 1 of 2

GRANTED

Case 3:06-cv-00495-MJJ Document 25 Filed 10/02/06 Page 1 of 2
SECOND STIPULATION TO AMEND COMPLAINT - 2 –

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DATED: May 31, 2006 OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY

 ______/S/_________________________

 STEVE Q. ROWEELL

 Deputy City Attorney

Attorneys for the City of Oakland,

Defendants Sgt. David Faeth and Officer Mark

Chinen _____________________________________________________________________________

ORDER

Good cause appearing therefor.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: ________________________

______________________________________

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

Case 3:06-cv-00495-MJJ Document 19 Filed 06/02/2006 Page 2 of 2

10/2/2006

Case 3:06-cv-00495-MJJ Document 25 Filed 10/02/06 Page 2 of 2