Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_14-cv-01670/USCOURTS-caed-1_14-cv-01670-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Kathleen L. Chandler
Plaintiff
Convergent Outsourcing, Inc.
Defendant

Document Text:

Page 1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KATHLEEN L. CHANDLER,

Plaintiff,

vs.

CONVERGENT OUTSOURCING, INC.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. 1:14-cv-01670---SKO

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF 

COURT TO ADMINISTRATIVELY 

CLOSE CASE

On January 22, 2015, Plaintiff filed a notice of voluntary dismissal with prejudice

pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i). 

In relevant part, Rule 41(a)(1)(A) provides as follows:

[A] plaintiff may dismiss an action with a court order by filing: (i) a notice of 

dismissal before the opposing party serves either an answer or a motion for 

summary judgment; or (ii) a stipulation of dismissal signed by all parties who 

have appeared.

Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A). "The plaintiff may dismiss some or all of the defendants, or some 

or all of his claims, through a Rule 41(a)(1) notice," and the dismissal "automatically 

Case 1:14-cv-01670---SKO Document 10 Filed 01/30/15 Page 1 of 2
Page 2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

terminates the action as to the defendants who are the subjects of the notice." Wilson v. City of 

San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997).

Because Plaintiff filed a notice of dismissal of this case with prejudice under Rule 

41(a)(1)(A)(i), this case has automatically terminated. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i).

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is to 

administratively close this case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 30, 2015 /s/ Sheila K. Oberto 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:14-cv-01670---SKO Document 10 Filed 01/30/15 Page 2 of 2