Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_08-cv-00331/USCOURTS-caed-1_08-cv-00331-4/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Mike Knowles
Respondent
PF Lazor
Petitioner

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

PF LAZOR,

Petitioner,

v.

MIKE KNOWLES, Warden

Respondent.

 /

1:08-cv-00331 OWW DLB HC

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATION, DISMISSING

PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS,

AND DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO

ENTER JUDGMENT

[Doc. 4]

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. 

 On March 14, 2008, the Magistrate Judge issued Findings and Recommendation that the

Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus be DISMISSED. This Findings and Recommendation was

served on all parties and contained notice that any objections were to be filed within thirty (30)

days of the date of service of the order. The thirty day period of time passed and no party filed

objections. Therefore, on April 28, 2008, the undersigned adopted the Findings and

Recommendation in full and judgment was entered. (Court Docs. 7, 8.) Thereafter, on May 222,

2008, Petitioner filed a motion to vacate the order entering judgment. (Court Doc. 11.) 

Petitioner indicated that his efforts to send a timely motion for extension of time to file

objections was thwarted by prison officials. In the interest of justice, the undersigned vacated the

Court’s April 28, 2008, order adopting the Findings and Recommendation and entry of judgment,

and granted Petitioner thirty (30) days to file objections. (Court Doc. 13.) Over thirty (30) days

Case 1:08-cv-00331-OWW -DLB Document 14 Filed 09/12/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

have passed and Petitioner has failed to file objections. 

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted

a de novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds that the

Findings and Recommendation is supported by the record and proper analysis. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendation issued March 14, 2008, is ADOPTED IN

FULL;

2. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DISMISSED; and,

3. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to enter judgment. This terminates this

action in its entirety.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 11, 2008 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger 

emm0d6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:08-cv-00331-OWW -DLB Document 14 Filed 09/12/08 Page 2 of 2