Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_00-cv-02122/USCOURTS-caed-2_00-cv-02122-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Charles Frederick Neely
Petitioner
James Rowland
Respondent

Document Text:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CHARLES FREDERICK NEELY,

Case No. 2:00-cv-02122-JKS (HC)

Petitioner,

FINAL JUDGMENT

vs.

JAMES ROWLAND,

Respondent.

The court having entered its Memorandum Decision of even date herewith disposing of

all the issues raised by the Petitioner,

NOW, THEREFORE IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED THAT the

petition for post conviction relief [28 U.S.C. § 2254] filed herein is DISMISSED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT the court declines to issue a Certificate of

Appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000) (“reasonable

jurists could debate whether (or, for that matter, agree that) the petition should have been

resolved in a different manner or that the issues presented were adequate to deserve

encouragement to proceed further” (internal quotation marks omitted)). All issues raised in the

petition were addressed by the California Court of Appeal in its decision and no reasonable jurist

could find that its decision was “objectively unreasonable.”

Dated at Anchorage, Alaska this 22nd day of May, 2006.

s/ James K. Singleton, Jr.

JAMES K. SINGLETON, JR.

United States District Judge

Case 2:00-cv-02122-JKS Document 12 Filed 05/22/06 Page 1 of 1