Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-01317/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-01317-13/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Anlin Industries, Inc.
Counter Defendant
Paul Burgess
Counter Claimant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ANLIN INDUSTRIES, INC., a California )

corporation )

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. )

)

PAUL BURGESS, )

)

)

)

Defendant. )

 )

1:05cv1317 DLB

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

TO DISMISS THE THIRD THROUGH

SEVENTH CAUSES OF ACTION WITHOUT

PREJUDICE

(Document 106-1)

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION

TO STAY ACTION AS MOOT

(Document 105-1)

Plaintiff Anlin Industries, Inc. (“Plaintiff”) filed the instant action on October 19, 2005,

alleging violations of the Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act (“ACPA”) and various

causes of action for trademark infringement and unfair competition under Federal and State laws. 

On March 5, 2007, the Court granted Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment on the fist

and second causes of action for violation of the ACPA. The Court granted Plaintiff’s request for

an injunction and its request to transfer the domain names to Plaintiff’s control. The Court also

granted Plaintiff statutory damages in the amount of $12,500. 

On March 14, 2007, Defendant Paul Burgess (“Defendant”) filed a motion to stay the

action pending his appeal of the March 5, 2007, order granting summary judgment.

Case 1:05-cv-01317-DLB Document 120 Filed 04/11/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

On March 15, 2007, Plaintiff filed a motion to dismiss the remaining causes of action

without prejudice, explaining that it had obtained the majority of the relief sought. Defendant

filed a non-opposition to the motion on March 19, 2007.

Accordingly, as it appears that the parties are in agreement, Plaintiff’s motion to dismiss

the third through seventh causes of action is GRANTED. The third through seventh causes of

action are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. 

This dismissal concludes this action in its entirety, therefore rendering Defendant’s

motion to stay moot. Thus, it is DENIED AS MOOT. Defendant’s March 29, 2007, notice of

interlocutory appeal can now be construed and treated as an appeal from a final judgment. 

The Court will enter judgment by separate order.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: April 10, 2007 /s/ Dennis L. Beck 

3b142a UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:05-cv-01317-DLB Document 120 Filed 04/11/07 Page 2 of 2