Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-05799/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-05799-6/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Edward Overstreet
Petitioner
James A. Yates
Respondent

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

EDWARD OVERSTREET,

Petitioner,

vs.

JAMES A. YATES,

Respondent.

_______________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

NO. 1:04-cv-05799-LJO-TAG

ORDER GRANTING RESPONDENT’S

APPLICATION FOR

ENLARGEMENT OF TIME TO FILE

AN ANSWER (Doc. 38); ORDER

DIRECTING RESPONDENT TO FILE

HIS ANSWER BY AUGUST 8, 2007 

 

On April 10, 2007, the Court ordered Respondent to file an answer. (Doc. 37). On June

29, 2007, Respondent filed the instant application for an extension of time to file the answer,

stating that other legal obligations in counsel’s caseload had prevented Respondent from filing

the answer within the allotted time. (Doc. 38, p. 2). Respondent requests an additional thirty

days, up to an including August 8, 2007, within which to file the answer. (Id. at p. 4). 

GOOD CAUSE appearing therefor, it is HEREBY ORDERED that Respondent’s

application for first enlargement of time within which to file an answer (Doc. 38), is GRANTED. 

Respondent is given an additional thirty (30) additional days, to an including August 8, 2007,

within which to file a responsive pleading.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 29, 2007 /s/ Theresa A. Goldner 

j6eb3d UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

Case 1:04-cv-05799-LJO -JMD Document 40 Filed 06/29/07 Page 1 of 1