Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_09-cv-00705/USCOURTS-caed-2_09-cv-00705-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Ray Rhead
Plaintiff
Ryder Integrated Logistics, Inc.
Defendant

Document Text:

1 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND DISCOVERY DEADLINES 

Case No. 2:09-CV-00705-MCE-GGH 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

MILLER L

A

W

GRO

UP

A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION

SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA

Janine S. Simerly (SBN 102361) 

jss@millerlawgroup.com 

Alexander C. Miller (SBN 252483) 

acm@millerlawgroup.com 

MILLER LAW GROUP 

A Professional Corporation 

111 Sutter Street, Suite 700 

San Francisco, CA 94104 

Tel. (415) 464-4300 

Fax (415) 464-4336 

Attorneys for Defendant 

RYDER INTEGRATED LOGISTICS, INC. 

Robin K. Perkins (SBN 131252) 

rperkins@perkins-lawoffice.com

Perkins & Associates 

300 Capitol Mall, Suite 1800 

Sacramento, CA 95814 

Tel. (916) 446-2000 

Fax (916) 447-6400 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

RAY RHEAD 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

RAY RHEAD, 

 Plaintiff, 

v. 

RYDER INTEGRATED LOGISTICS, INC., a 

Delaware Corporation doing business in 

California; and DOES 1 through 30, inclusive

 Defendant(s). 

 

Case No.: 2:09-CV-00705-MCE-GGH 

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND 

DISCOVERY DEADLINES 

Complaint filed: January 23, 2009 

Trial Date: March 28, 2011 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 2:09-cv-00705-MCE -GGH Document 16 Filed 07/09/10 Page 1 of 4
2 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND DISCOVERY DEADLINES 

Case No. 2:09-CV-00705-MCE-GGH 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

MILLER L

A

W

GRO

UP

A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION

SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA

WHEREAS, in the Pretrial Scheduling Order filed in this matter on May 26, 

2009, the Honorable Morrison C. England ordered the Plaintiff RAY RHEAD and Defendant 

RYDER INTEGRATED LOGISTICS, INC. (“the parties”) to complete all discovery, with the 

exception of expert discovery, by May 28, 2010 (Court Docket No. 9); 

WHEREAS, in the Pretrial Scheduling Order, the Court ordered the parties to 

disclose the name, address, and area of expertise of each expert that they propose to 

tender at trial not later than July 28, 2010, with designation of supplemental expert 

witnesses to take place within twenty days following the designation of expert witnesses 

(Id.); 

WHEREAS, Defendant began Plaintiff’s deposition on April 14, 2010, but was 

unable to finish it at that time; 

WHEREAS, on April 28, 2010, the parties stipulated to a continuance of the 

non-expert discovery deadline until July 28, 2010 due to difficultly locating witnesses and 

the unavailability of lead defense counsel Janine S. Simerly due to trial in the matter of 

Veronese v. Lucasfilm, LTD, Superior Court of California, County of Marin, Case No. CIV 

091548, which was scheduled to begin on May 7, 2010 for an estimated four to six weeks; 

WHEREAS, on May 12, 2010, the Court issued an order continuing the 

deadline for completion of all discovery, with the exception of expert discovery, until July 28, 

2010 (Court Docket No. 14); 

WHEREAS, the trial in the matter of Veronese v. Lucasfilm, LTD did not begin 

until May 28, 2010 and continued until June 30, 2010; 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 2:09-cv-00705-MCE -GGH Document 16 Filed 07/09/10 Page 2 of 4
3 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND DISCOVERY DEADLINES 

Case No. 2:09-CV-00705-MCE-GGH 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

MILLER L

A

W

GRO

UP

A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION

SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA

WHEREAS, Ms. Simerly has been unavailable to complete Plaintiff’s 

deposition, or for Plaintiff to take the additional depositions of two individuals who are former 

employees of Defendant, due to that trial; 

WHEREAS, the parties are unable to complete those depositions before midAugust due to scheduling conflicts; 

WHEREAS, the parties and their counsel request that the July 28, 2010 nonexpert discovery deadline and July 28, 2010 expert disclosure deadline be vacated, and be 

continued to August 27, 2010; 

 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties, through their 

respective counsel, that non-expert discovery deadline and July 28, 2010 expert disclosure 

deadline be vacated, and be continued to August 27, 2010. 

 IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED by and between the parties, through their 

respective counsel, that he expert disclosure deadline be vacated, and be continued to 

August 27, 2010. 

/ / / 

/ / / 

/ / / 

/ / / 

/ / / 

/ / / 

/ / / 

/ / / 

/ / / 

/ / / 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 2:09-cv-00705-MCE -GGH Document 16 Filed 07/09/10 Page 3 of 4
4 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND DISCOVERY DEADLINES 

Case No. 2:09-CV-00705-MCE-GGH 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

MILLER L

A

W

GRO

UP

A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION

SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

Dated: July 7, 2010 MILLER LAW GROUP 

A Professional Corporation 

By: /s/ 

JANINE S. SIMERLY 

Attorneys for Defendant 

RYDER INTEGRATED LOGISTICS, INC. 

Dated: July 7, 2010 PERKINS & ASSOCIATES 

By: /s/ 

ROBIN K. PERKINS 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

RAY RHEAD 

 Good cause due to Ms. Simerly’s unavailability appearing, the Court hereby 

modifies its Pretrial Scheduling Order in this matter to continue the deadline for completion 

of all discovery, with the exception of expert discovery, until August 27, 2010. The Court 

further orders that the expert disclosure deadline be vacated, and be continued to August 

27, 2010. All other dates in the original scheduling order remain unchanged. 

 IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: July 8, 2010 

__________________________________ 

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 2:09-cv-00705-MCE -GGH Document 16 Filed 07/09/10 Page 4 of 4