Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-16-07406/USCOURTS-ca4-16-07406-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Mauricio Hernandez-Martinez
Appellant
United States of America
Appellee

Document Text:

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-7406

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

MAURICIO HERNANDEZ-MARTINEZ,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Orangeburg. Margaret B. Seymour, Senior 

District Judge. (5:12-cr-00039-MBS-1)

Submitted: January 31, 2017 Decided: February 3, 2017

Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Mauricio Hernandez-Martinez, Appellant Pro Se. Julius Ness 

Richardson, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South 

Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 16-7406 Doc: 9 Filed: 02/03/2017 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Mauricio Hernandez-Martinez seeks to appeal the 

Government’s opposition to a motion in his criminal case. This 

court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 

28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and 

collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 

54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-

46 (1949). Hernandez-Martinez does not appeal from an order of 

the district court. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack 

of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the 

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

DISMISSED

Appeal: 16-7406 Doc: 9 Filed: 02/03/2017 Pg: 2 of 2