Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-06046/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-06046-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Yolanda Mendoza
Plaintiff
Monsanto Company
Defendant

Document Text:

[PROPOSED] ORDER ON MONSANTO'S 

UNOPPOSED REQUEST FOR CONTNIUANCE

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

YOLANDA MENDOZA,

Plaintiff,

v.

MONSANTO COMPANY,

Defendant.

Case No. 1:16-cv-00406-DAD-SMS

ORDER GRANTING MONSANTO 

COMPANY'S UNOPPOSED REQUEST FOR 

CONTNIUANCE OF RULE 26(f) 

SCHEDULING CONFERNCE AND 

RELATED DEADLINES

Magistrate Judge: Sandra M. Snyder

Upon consideration of Monsanto Company’s Unopposed Request for Continuance of Rule 

26(f) Scheduling Conference and Related Deadlines and for good cause shown, IT IS HEREBY 

ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED. The Rule 26(f) scheduling conference previously set 

for June 29, 2016 is hereby CONTINUED to August 17, 2016 at 2:00 PM in Courtroom 1 

(SMS). A Joint Scheduling Report prepared and executed by all counsel shall be electronically 

filed one (1) full week prior to the Scheduling Conference.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

 DATED: 6/7/2016 /s/ SANDRA M. SNYDER

 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 3:16-cv-06046-VC Document 88 Filed 06/07/16 Page 1 of 1