Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-00223/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-00223-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
City of Fairfield
Defendant
Bill Gresham
Defendant
Bijon Hughes
Plaintiff
J. Jacobsen
Defendant

Document Text:

_____________________________________________________________________________________________ 

Protective Order [05-CV-00223 DFL PAN] 1 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Kimberly E. Colwell, Esq. (SBN: 127604) 

Jennifer C. Addams, Esq. (SBN: 209355) 

MEYERS, NAVE, RIBACK, SILVER & WILSON 

555 12th Street, Suite 1500 

Oakland, CA 94607 

Telephone: (510) 808-2000 

Facsimile: (510) 444-1108 

Email: kcolwell@meyersnave.com

Attorneys for Defendants CITY OF FAIRFIELD, 

POLICE CHIEF WILLIAM GRESHAM and 

POLICE OFFIER JAUSIAH JACOBSEN 

Andrew C. Schwartz 

CASPER, MEADOWS & SCHWARTZ 

2121 N. California Blvd., Ste. 1020 

Walnut Creek, CA 94596 

Telephone: (925) 947-1147 

Facsimile: (925) 947-1131 

Email: Schwartz@cmslaw.com

Attorney for Plaintiff BIJON HUGHES 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

BIJON LEE HUGHES, 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

CITY OF FAIRFIELD, J. JACOBSEN, Badge 

No. 1200, individually and in his capacity as 

an Officer of the Fairfield Police department, 

BILL GRESHAM, individually and in his 

capacity as Chief of Police for the Fairfield 

Police Department, and DOES 1 through 50,

et al., 

Defendants. 

___________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO: 05-CV-00223 DFL PAN 

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 

Subject to the approval of this Court, the parties hereby stipulate to the following: 

Case 2:05-cv-00223-DFL-PAN Document 14 Filed 09/22/05 Page 1 of 4
_____________________________________________________________________________________________ 

Protective Order [05-CV-00223 DFL PAN] 2 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Defendants, City of Fairfield, Officer Jausiah Jacobsen, Chief of Police Bill Gresham 

And Does 1-50, were requested to provide plaintiff with a police report that is to be provided 

to Plaintiff. 

1. Documents 

1. Defendants' counsel is to provide to Plaintiff's attorney as “Confidential 

Material” a copy of Fairfield Police Department Information Report Number 05-

8273. 

B. Conditions for Document

a. Confidential Material shall be used solely in connection with this 

litigation and the preparation and trial of this case, or any related 

appellate proceeding, and not for another other purposed, including any 

other litigation. 

b. Confidential Material may be disclosed only to the following 

persons: 

(1) Counsel for any party to this action; 

(2) Paralegal, stenographic, clerical and secretarial personnel 

regularly employed by counsel referred to in (1); 

(3) Court personnel including stenographic reporters engaged in 

such proceedings as are necessarily incidental to preparation for the trial 

of this action: 

(4) Any outside expert or consultant retained in connection with 

the action, and not otherwise employed by either party; 

(5) Any "in house" expert designated by defendants to testify at 

trial in this matter: 

(6) Witnesses, other than the plaintiff herein, may have the 

documents disclosed to them during deposition proceedings; the 

witnesses may not leave the deposition with copies of the documents, 

and shall be bound by the provisions of the Non Disclosure Agreement. 

Case 2:05-cv-00223-DFL-PAN Document 14 Filed 09/22/05 Page 2 of 4
_____________________________________________________________________________________________ 

Protective Order [05-CV-00223 DFL PAN] 3 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Nothing in this paragraph (d) is intended to prevent official or employees 

of the City of Fairfield or other authorized government officials from 

having access to the documents if they would have had access in the 

norm al course of their job duties. 

c. Each person to whom disclosure is made, with the exception of 

counsel who are presumed to know of the contents of this protective 

order, shall prior to the time of disclosure be provided by the person 

furnishing him/her such material a copy of this order and the 

nondisclosure agreement and shall agree on the record or in writing that 

he/she has read the protective order. Such person also must consent to 

be subject to the jurisdiction of the United States District Court for the 

Eastern District of California with respect to any proceeding relating to 

enforcement of this order, including without limitation, any proceeding for 

contempt. Unless made on the record in this litigation, counsel making 

the disclosure to any person described above shall retain the original 

executed copy of said agreement until final termination of this litigation. 

d. At the conclusion of the trial and of any appeal or upon other 

termination of this litigation, all Confidential Material received under the 

provision of this order (including any copies made) shall be tendered 

back to Counsel for the City of Fairfield. Provisions of this order insofar 

as they restrict disclosure and use of the material shall be in effect until 

further order of this court. 

e. The foregoing is without prejudice to the right of any party: (a) to 

apply to the court for further protective order relating to any Confidential 

Material or relating to discovery in this litigation: (b) to apply to the court 

for an order removing the Confidential Material designation from any 

documents; and c) to apply to the court for an order compelling 

production of documents or modification of this order or for any order 

Case 2:05-cv-00223-DFL-PAN Document 14 Filed 09/22/05 Page 3 of 4
_____________________________________________________________________________________________ 

Protective Order [05-CV-00223 DFL PAN] 4 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

permitting disclosure of Confidential Material beyond the terms of this 

Order. 

f. Nothing in this order shall preclude a party form showing or 

disclosing to any person not listed in this order depositions transcripts, 

pleading or briefs containing Confidential Material if the document 

containing such materials. 

SO STIPULATED: 

DATED: 09/14/2005 __/s/______________________________ 

 Andrew C. Schwartz, Attorney for Plaintiff 

DATED: 09/19/2005 __/s/ ______________________________ 

 Kimberly E. Colwell ,Attorney for Defendants 

The court declines to approve the protective order because no showing is made why 

the police report should be maintained in confidence. Further, paragraph f above contains 

clerical mistakes that render the paragraph nonsensical. 

 

DATED: 9/21/2005 _/s/ David F. Levi_________________ 

 Hon. David F. Levi, U.S. District Judge 

 

782531_1.DOC 

Case 2:05-cv-00223-DFL-PAN Document 14 Filed 09/22/05 Page 4 of 4