Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_16-cv-01150/USCOURTS-caed-1_16-cv-01150-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Jose Acosta
Plaintiff
Fast N Esy #21
Defendant
Fast N Esy II, Inc.
Defendant
Vikram Vohra
Defendant
Vinay Vohra
Defendant

Document Text:

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOSE ACOSTA,

Plaintiff,

vs.

FAST N ESY II, INC., et al.,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. 1:16-cv-01150-LJO-SAB

ORDER RE STIPULATION FOR 

CONTINUANCE OF MANDATORY 

SCHEDULING CONFERENCE

(ECF No. 9)

WHEREAS, a Mandatory Scheduling Conference in this action is currently set for 

October 31, 2016, pursuant to the Court’s Order dated August 5, 2016 (Dkt. 3);

WHEREAS, Defendants, Fast N Esy II, Inc. dba Fast N Esy #21, Vinay Vohra, and 

Vikram Vohra (“Defendants,” and together with Plaintiff Jose Acosta, “the Parties”), have filed 

a Motion to Dismiss and/or to Strike and/or for a More Definite Statement (Dkt. 8; the 

“Motion”), which is set for hearing on November 7, 2016;

WHEREAS, the Parties wish to conserve Court resources which might be expended 

unnecessarily if the Scheduling Conference were to be held prior to Defendants’ Motion in the 

event Plaintiff’s claims are dismissed or amended as a result of the Motion;

NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties, by and through their respective counsel, stipulate to a 

continuance of the Mandatory Scheduling Conference currently set for October 31, 2016 to a 

Case 1:16-cv-01150-LJO-SAB Document 10 Filed 10/18/16 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

date at the Court’s convenience after December 13, 2016, to allow time for Defendants’ motion 

to be heard and ruled upon by the Court.

Dated: October 18, 2016 MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C.

/s/ Tanya E. Moore 

 Tanya E. Moore

Attorney for Plaintiff, 

Jose Acosta

Dated: October 18, 2016 THORNTON DAVIDSON, P.C.

/s/ Thornton Davidson

 Thornton Davidson

Attorney for Defendants,

Fast N Esy II, Inc. dba Fast N Esy #21, 

Vinay Vohra, and Vikram Vohra

ORDER

The parties having so stipulated and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Mandatory Scheduling Conference currently set for 

October 31, 2016, is continued to December 14, 2016, at 9:30 a.m. before the undersigned in 

Courtroom 9. The parties are to file their Joint Scheduling Report no later than seven days prior 

to the conference. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 18, 2016 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:16-cv-01150-LJO-SAB Document 10 Filed 10/18/16 Page 2 of 2