Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-15-08037/USCOURTS-ca4-15-08037-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Christopher Mitchell
Appellant
United States of America
Appellee

Document Text:

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-8037

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

CHRISTOPHER MITCHELL, a/k/a Hassan Jones, a/k/a Q Ili-Yaas 

Haakeem Farrakhan-Muhammad,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern 

District of West Virginia, at Charleston. John T. Copenhaver, 

Jr., District Judge. (2:90-cr-00020-2)

Submitted: June 23, 2016 Decided: June 28, 2016

Before MOTZ, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Christopher Mitchell, Appellant Pro Se. Candace Haley Bunn, John 

J. Frail, Steven Loew, Assistant United States Attorneys, 

Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 15-8037 Doc: 11 Filed: 06/28/2016 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Christopher Mitchell appeals the district court’s order

granting his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion in part by 

lowering his base and total offense levels by two levels but 

denying his motion in part by deeming him ineligible for a sentence 

reduction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible 

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the 

district court. See United States v. Mitchell, No. 2:90-cr-00020-

2 (S.D. W. Va. Dec. 1, 2015). We further deny Mitchell’s motion 

for a transcript of his sentencing proceeding at the Government’s 

expense because the record permits us to determine the drug weight 

relied on by the district court at sentencing. We dispense with 

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Appeal: 15-8037 Doc: 11 Filed: 06/28/2016 Pg: 2 of 2