Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-04629/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-04629-3/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Patrick R. Donahoe
Defendant
Deidra A. Lintz
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DEIDRA A. LINTZ,

Plaintiff,

v.

PATRICK R. DONAHOE,

Defendant.

No. 2:14-cv-0224 JAM DAD PS

ORDER SETTING STATUS

(PRETRIAL SCHEDULING)

CONFERENCE

Plaintiff Deidra Lintz is proceeding pro se in the above entitled action. The case was 

referred to the undersigned pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21).

Defendant has filed an answer. Pursuant to the provisions of Rule 16 of the Federal Rules 

of Civil Procedure, IT IS ORDERED that:

1. A Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference is set for Friday, October 9, 2015, at 10:00 

a.m., at the United States District Court, 501 I Street, Sacramento, California, in Courtroom No. 

27, before the undersigned.

2. Each party is required to appear at the Status Conference, either by counsel or, if 

proceeding in propria persona, on her own behalf. Any party may appear at the status conference 

telephonically if the party pre-arranges such appearance by contacting Pete Buzo, the courtroom 

deputy of the undersigned magistrate judge, at (916) 930-4128, no later than 48 hours before the 

Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference; a land line telephone number must be provided.

Case 3:15-cv-04629-MEJ Document 17 Filed 08/28/15 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

3. Plaintiff shall file and serve a status report on or before September 25, 2015, and 

defendant shall file and serve a status report on or before October 2, 2015. Each party’s status 

report shall address all of the following matters:

a. Progress of service of process;

b. Possible joinder of additional parties;

c. Possible amendment of the pleadings;

d. Jurisdiction and venue;

e. Anticipated motions and the scheduling thereof;

f. Anticipated discovery and the scheduling thereof, including disclosure of 

expert witnesses;

g. Future proceedings, including the setting of appropriate cut-off dates for 

discovery and for law and motion, and the scheduling of a final pretrial 

conference and trial;

h. Modification of standard pretrial procedures specified by the rules due to 

the relative simplicity or complexity of the action;

i. Whether the case is related to any other case, including matters in 

bankruptcy;

j. Whether the parties will stipulate to the magistrate judge assigned to this 

matter acting as settlement judge, waiving any disqualification by virtue of 

his so acting, or whether they prefer to have a Settlement Conference 

before another magistrate judge;

k. Whether the parties intend to consent to proceed before a United States 

Magistrate Judge; and

l. Any other matters that may aid in the just and expeditious disposition of 

this action.

/////

/////

/////

/////

/////

Case 3:15-cv-04629-MEJ Document 17 Filed 08/28/15 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3

4. The parties are cautioned that failure to file a status report or failure to appear at the 

status conference may result in an order imposing an appropriate sanction. See Local Rules 110 

and 183.

Dated: August 28, 2015

DAD:6

Ddad1\orders.pro se\lintz0224.ossc.ord

Case 3:15-cv-04629-MEJ Document 17 Filed 08/28/15 Page 3 of 3