Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca5-19-50957/USCOURTS-ca5-19-50957-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Rodrigo Ramirez-Garcia
Appellant
United States of America
Appellee

Document Text:

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-50957

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

RODRIGO RAMIREZ-GARCIA,

Defendant-Appellant

************************************

Consolidated with 19-50958

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

RODRIGO RAMIREZ-GARCIA, also known as Rodrigo Rmz, also known as 

Rodrigo Ramirez Garcia, also known as Rodrigo Garcia, also known as 

Rodrigo Garcia-Ramirez,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeals from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 4:17-CR-99-6

 USDC No. 4:19-CR-309-1

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

May 5, 2020

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 19-50957 Document: 00515405672 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/05/2020
No. 19-50957 c/w

No. 19-50958

2

Before HAYNES, DUNCAN, and ENGELHARDT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Rodrigo RamirezGarcia in this consolidated appeal has moved for leave to withdraw and has 

filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and 

United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Ramirez-Garcia has not 

filed a response. He did, however, execute a waiver of any challenge to his 

conviction; accordingly, we conclude that his conviction is not before us and 

will not address it further. See United States v. Garcia, 483 F.3d 289, 290-91 

(5th Cir. 2007).

With respect to the revocation of his supervised release and his 

sentences, we have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the 

record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal 

of the revocation and sentences presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate 

review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, 

counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS 

DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Case: 19-50957 Document: 00515405672 Page: 2 Date Filed: 05/05/2020