Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_09-cv-02529/USCOURTS-caed-2_09-cv-02529-4/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Vincent C. Ortiz
Petitioner
James Yates
Respondent

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

VINCENT C. ORTIZ,

Petitioner, No. CIV S-09-2529 GEB GGH P

vs.

JAMES YATES,

Respondent. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

By order March 23, 2010, petitioner was ordered to show cause, within twenty

days, why respondent’s January 20, 2010, motion to dismiss should not be granted. The twenty

day period has now expired, and petitioner has not shown cause or otherwise responded to the

court's order.

IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without

prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty

days after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written

objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned

“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Any reply to the objections

Case 2:09-cv-02529-GEB-GGH Document 15 Filed 05/26/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

shall be served and filed within ten days after service of the objections. The parties are advised

that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District

Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: May 25, 2010

 /s/ Gregory G. Hollows

 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

GGH:035

orti2529.fsc

Case 2:09-cv-02529-GEB-GGH Document 15 Filed 05/26/10 Page 2 of 2