Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_08-cv-05408/USCOURTS-cand-3_08-cv-05408-3/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
National Nuclear Security Administration
Defendant
Tri-Valley Cares
Plaintiff
United States Department of Energy
Defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Stipulation to Briefing

C 08-5408 SC

TONY WEST

Assistant Attorney General

ISAAC R. CAMPBELL

United States Department of Justice

Civil Division, Federal Programs Branch

20 Massachusetts Avenue, NW, Room 6130

Washington, D.C. 20530

Tel: (202) 616-8476

Fax: (202) 616-8460

JOSEPH P. RUSSONIELLO, CSBN 44332

United States Attorney

JOANN M. SWANSON, CSBN 88143

Assistant United States Attorney

Chief, Civil Division

ILA C. DEISS, NY SBN 3052909

Assistant United States Attorney

450 Golden Gate Avenue, Box 36055

San Francisco, California 94102

Telephone: (415) 436-7124

FAX: (415) 436-7169

Attorneys for Defendants

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

TRI-VALLEY CARES, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. )

)

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF )

ENERGY and NATIONAL NUCLEAR )

SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, )

)

Defendants. )

 )

No. C 08-5408 SC

STIPULATION TO BRIEFING; and

[Proposed] ORDER 

Date: July 23, 2010

Time: 10:00 a.m.

Plaintiff, Tri-Valley Cares, and defendants, the United States Department of Energy (“DOE”),

and the National Nuclear Security Administration (“NNSA”), by and through their counsel of

record, hereby stipulate, subject to the approval of the Court, to the following briefing schedule in

this Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) case:

1. On March 17, 2010, the Court vacated the case management conference scheduled for

Case 3:08-cv-05408-SC Document 22 Filed 03/18/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Stipulation to Briefing

C 08-5408 SC 2

March 19, 2010.

2. The parties believe this case can be resolved through cross-motions for summary judgment,

in which plaintiff would file its motion first given plaintiff’s intent to challenge as of yet

unidentified agency redactions and its pattern and practice claim.

3. Accordingly, the parties respectfully ask this Court to set the briefing schedule on the

parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment as follows:

Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment: April 16, 2010.

Defendants’ Cross-Motion and Opposition: May 17, 2010 

Plaintiff’s Cross-Opposition and Reply: June 16, 2010 

Defendants’ Reply: July 1, 2010 

Hearing: July 23, 2010 at 10:00 a.m.

Dated: March 18, 2010 Respectfully submitted,

JOSEPH P. RUSSONIELLO

United States Attorney

 /s/

ILA C. DEISS

Assistant United States Attorney

Attorney for Defendants

ISAAC CAMPBELL

Trial Attorney

United States Department of Justice

Dated: March 18, 2010 /s/

SCOTT J. YUNDT

Attorney for Plaintiff

ORDER

Pursuant to the stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Date: _____________________________

SAMUEL CONTI

United States District Judge

3/18/10

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Samuel Conti

Case 3:08-cv-05408-SC Document 22 Filed 03/18/10 Page 2 of 2