Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_96-cv-06053/USCOURTS-caed-1_96-cv-06053-7/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
California Table Grape Commission
Defendant
Delano Farms Company
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 1 

US1DOCS 5640597v1

WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE AND DORR LLP 

Seth P. Waxman 

Randolph D. Moss 

Todd Zubler 

Brian M. Boynton #222193 

1875 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. 

Washington, D.C. 20006-3642 

BAKER, MANOCK & JENSEN 

Robert D. Wilkinson #100478 

5260 North Palm Avenue, Suite 421 

Fresno, California 93704-2209 

Counsel for Defendant THE CALIFORNIA TABLE GRAPE COMMISSION 

LAW OFFICES OF BRIAN C. LEIGHTON 

Brian C. Leighton #090907 

701 Pollasky Avenue 

Clovis, California 93612 

Counsel for Plaintiffs DELANO FARMS COMPANY, THE SUSAN NEILL COMPANY, and 

LUCAS BROS. PARTNERSHIP 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

DELANO FARMS COMPANY, ) 

a Washington corporation, ) 

THE SUSAN NEILL COMPANY, ) Case No. CV-F-96-6053 OWW DLB 

a California corporation, ) 

LUCAS BROS. PARTNERSHIP, ) STIPULATED REVISION TO SCHEDULE 

a California Partnership, ) AND PROPOSED ORDER 

 ) 

 Plaintiffs, ) 

 ) 

v. ) 

 ) 

THE CALIFORNIA TABLE ) 

GRAPE COMMISSION, ) 

 ) 

 Defendant. ) 

 ) 

______________________________) 

WHEREAS on June 22, 2005, the parties to this action submitted a Joint Status Report 

setting forth a proposed schedule for resumption of the litigation following the Supreme Court’s 

decision in Johanns v. Livestock Marketing Ass’n, 125 S. Ct. 2055 (2005); 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 1:96-cv-06053-OWW -DLB Document 348 Filed 05/18/06 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 2 

US1DOCS 5640597v1

WHEREAS on August 26, 2005, the parties submitted a revised joint scheduling proposal, 

which was adopted by the Court in an order dated August 31, 2005; 

WHEREAS the schedule adopted by the Court on August 31, 2005 subsequently has been 

modified by the Court at the request of the parties; 

WHEREAS the current schedule calls for the parties to file reply briefs in support of their 

cross-motions for summary judgment on May 5, 2006; 

WHEREAS professional commitments of counsel for Defendant have made adherence to the 

current schedule difficult; and 

WHEREAS counsel for Plaintiffs has consented to an extension of the deadline for filing 

reply briefs in support of the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment until May 11, 2006; 

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by the parties to this action, through their respective 

attorneys of record, that the deadline for filing reply briefs in support of their cross-motions for 

summary judgment be extended to and including May 11, 2006. 

Dated: May 3, 2006 WILMER CUTLER PICKERING 

 HALE AND DORR LLP 

Seth P. Waxman 

Randolph D. Moss 

Todd Zubler 

Brian M. Boynton 

BAKER, MANOCK & JENSEN 

Robert D. Wilkinson 

Joshua S. Daniels 

/s/ Brian M. Boynton 

By _____________________________ 

Brian M. Boynton 

Counsel for Defendant THE CALIFORNIA TABLE 

GRAPE COMMISSION 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 1:96-cv-06053-OWW -DLB Document 348 Filed 05/18/06 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 3 

US1DOCS 5640597v1

Dated: May 3, 2006 LAW OFFICES OF BRIAN C. LEIGHTON 

/s/ Brian C. Leighton (as authorized 5-3-06) 

By ___________________________ 

Brian C. Leighton 

Counsel for Plaintiffs DELANO FARMS COMPANY, 

THE SUSAN NEILL COMPANY, and LUCAS 

BROS. PARTNERSHIP 

ORDER 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: __5/5/06____________ /s/Oliver W. Wanger

_____________________________ 

 Oliver W. Wanger 

 United States District Judge 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 1:96-cv-06053-OWW -DLB Document 348 Filed 05/18/06 Page 3 of 3