Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_14-cv-01037/USCOURTS-caed-1_14-cv-01037-4/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Archie Cranford
Plaintiff
Dhorleen Narcela
Defendant

Document Text:

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Plaintiff Archie Cranford is a civil detainee proceeding pro se in this civil rights action 

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Individuals detained pursuant to California Welfare and Institutions 

Code § 6600 et seq. are civil detainees and are not prisoners within the meaning of the Prison 

Litigation Reform Act. Page v. Torrey, 201 F.3d 1136, 1140 (9th Cir. 2000).

On September 10, 2013, the undersigned dismissed Plaintiff’s complaint for failure to state a 

claim upon which relief may be granted and ordered Plaintiff to file an amended complaint within 

thirty days. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A; 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e). To date, Plaintiff has not complied with or 

otherwise responded to the Court’s order. As a result, there is no pleading on file which sets forth any 

claims upon which relief may be granted under section 1983. 

///

///

///

ARCHIE CRANFORD,

 Plaintiff,

v.

DHORLEEN NARCELA, et al.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: 1:14-cv-01037-LJO-SAB (PC)

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION 

RECOMMENDING DISMISSAL OF ACTION 

FOR FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH A COURT 

ORDER

[ECF No. 9]

Case 1:14-cv-01037-LJO-SAB Document 11 Filed 12/31/14 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Accordingly, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A and 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e), it is HEREBY 

ORDERED that this action is dismissed, with prejudice, based on Plaintiff’s failure to state any claims 

upon which relief may be granted under section 1983.

This Findings and Recommendation will be submitted to the United States District Judge 

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of Title 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within thirty (30) days 

after being served with this Findings and Recommendation, Plaintiff may file written objections with 

the Court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and 

Recommendation.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may 

result in the waiver of rights on appeal. . Wilkerson v. Wheeler, 772 F.3d 834, 839 (9th Cir. 2014) 

(citing Baxter v. Sullivan, 923 F.2d 1391, 1394 (9th Cir. 1991)).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: December 31, 2014 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:14-cv-01037-LJO-SAB Document 11 Filed 12/31/14 Page 2 of 2