Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-09-07716/USCOURTS-ca4-09-07716-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Anthony A. Blagrove
Appellant
United States of America
Appellee

Document Text:

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 09-7716 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff – Appellee, 

 v. 

ANTHONY A. BLAGROVE, a/k/a Tony, 

 Defendant – Appellant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, Senior 

District Judge. (2:95-cr-00052-RGD-1) 

Submitted: January 19, 2010 Decided: January 27, 2010 

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges. 

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Anthony A. Blagrove, Appellant Pro Se. William David Muhr, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 

Appeal: 09-7716 Doc: 11 Filed: 01/27/2010 Pg: 1 of 2
2 

PER CURIAM: 

Anthony A. Blagrove appeals the district court’s order 

denying his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 

U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and 

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the 

reasons stated by the district court. United States v. 

Blagrove, No. 2:95-cr-00052-RGD-1 (E.D. Va. Aug. 24, 2009). We 

further deny Blagrove’s motion for documents in his brother’s 

district court case. We dispense with oral argument because the 

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before the court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process. 

AFFIRMED

Appeal: 09-7716 Doc: 11 Filed: 01/27/2010 Pg: 2 of 2