Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cr-00100/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cr-00100-8/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Holly Adams
Defendant
Devlin Hosner
Defendant
USA
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1 STIPULATION REGARDING EXCLUDABLE TIME 

PERIODS UNDER SPEEDY TRIAL ACT

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

PHILLIP A. TALBERT 

United States Attorney 

SAM STEFANKI 

Assistant United States Attorney 

501 I Street, Suite 10-100 

Sacramento, CA 95814 

Telephone: (916) 554-2700 

Facsimile: (916) 554-2900 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

United States of America 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

HOLLY ADAMS and 

DEVLIN HOSNER, 

 Defendants. 

CASE NO. 2:22-CR-00100-JAM 

STIPULATION REGARDING EXCLUDABLE 

TIME PERIODS UNDER SPEEDY TRIAL ACT; 

FINDINGS AND ORDER 

DATE: November 15, 2022 

TIME: 9:00 a.m. 

COURT: Hon. John A. Mendez 

STIPULATION

1. By previous order, this matter was set for status on November 15, 2022. 

2. By this stipulation, the defendants now move to continue the status conference until 

March 7, 2023, at 9:00 a.m., and to exclude time between November 15, 2022, and March 7, 2023, 

under Local Code T4. 

3. The parties agree and stipulate, and request that the Court find the following: 

a) The government has represented that the discovery associated with this case 

includes thousands of pages of discovery, as well as the results of forensic examinations of 

electronic devices. Much of this discovery has been either produced directly to counsel and/or 

made available for inspection and copying, and the government anticipates producing additional 

thousands of pages of discovery to the defendants in the coming days. 

Case 2:22-cr-00100-JAM Document 45 Filed 11/09/22 Page 1 of 3
 

2 STIPULATION REGARDING EXCLUDABLE TIME 

PERIODS UNDER SPEEDY TRIAL ACT

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

b) Counsel for the defendants desire additional time to consult with their clients, 

review the current charges, conduct investigation and research related to the charges, review and 

copy discovery, discuss potential resolutions with their clients, and otherwise prepare for trial. 

c) Counsel for the defendants believe that failure to grant the above-requested 

continuance would deny them the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into 

account the exercise of due diligence. 

d) The government does not object to the continuance. 

e) Based on the above-stated findings, the ends of justice served by continuing the 

case as requested outweigh the interest of the public and the defendants in a trial within the 

original date prescribed by the Speedy Trial Act. 

f) For the purpose of computing time under the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161, 

et seq., within which trial must commence, the time period of November 15, 2022, to March 7, 

2023, inclusive, is deemed excludable pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A), B(iv) [Local Code 

T4] because it results from a continuance granted by the Court at the defendants’ request on the 

basis of the Court’s finding that the ends of justice served by taking such action outweigh the 

best interest of the public and the defendants in a speedy trial. 

/// 

/// 

/// 

/// 

/// 

/// 

/// 

/// 

/// 

/// 

/// 

/// 

Case 2:22-cr-00100-JAM Document 45 Filed 11/09/22 Page 2 of 3
 

3 STIPULATION REGARDING EXCLUDABLE TIME 

PERIODS UNDER SPEEDY TRIAL ACT

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

4. Nothing in this stipulation and order shall preclude a finding that other provisions of the 

Speedy Trial Act dictate that additional time periods are excludable from the period within which a trial 

must commence. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

Dated: November 9, 2022 PHILLIP A. TALBERT 

United States Attorney 

/s/ SAM STEFANKI 

 SAM STEFANKI 

Assistant United States Attorney 

Dated: November 9, 2022 /s/ CHRISTINA SINHA 

 CHRISTINA SINHA 

Counsel for Defendant 

HOLLY ADAMS 

Dated: November 9, 2022 /s/ TONI WHITE 

 TONI WHITE 

Counsel for Defendant 

DEVLIN HOSNER

ORDER 

IT IS SO FOUND AND ORDERED this 9th day of November, 2022. 

 /s/ John A. Mendez 

 THE HONORABLE JOHN A. MENDEZ 

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 2:22-cr-00100-JAM Document 45 Filed 11/09/22 Page 3 of 3