Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_10-cv-00304/USCOURTS-caed-1_10-cv-00304-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Ametek Incorporated
Defendant
Antonio Manquero
Plaintiff
Damian Manquero
Plaintiff
Francisco Manquero
Plaintiff
Mireya Manquero
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO ANSWER 

1

Law Offices of: 

Sayre & Levitt, LLP 

FEDERICO CASTELAN SAYRE, ESQ., SBN 067420 

TYLER R. DOWDALL, ESQ., SBN 258950 

SAYRE & LEVITT, LLP 

900 N. BROADWAY, 4th FLOOR 

SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 92701-3452 

Phone (714) 550-9117 

Facsimile (714) 550-9125 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs: 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

COME NOW, the Parties herein, by and through their respective counsel of 

record, Tyler R. Dowdall, Esq., SAYRE & LEVITT, LLP, for Plaintiffs MIREYA 

MIREYA MANQUERO, 

individually and as successor in 

interest to the Estate of Anthony 

Manquero; DAMIAN MANQUERO, 

individually and as successor in 

interest to the Estate of Anthony 

Manquero; ANTONIO 

MANQUERO, individually and as 

successor in interest to the Estate of 

Anthony Manquero; FRANCISCO 

MANQUERO, individually and as 

successor in interest to the Estate of 

Anthony Manquero; ESTATE OF 

ANTHONY MANQUERO, by and 

through its successors in interest, 

MIREYA MANQUERO, DAMIAN 

MANQUERO, ANTONIO 

MANQUERO, FRANCISCO 

MANQUERO. 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

AMETEK INCORPORATED, a 

Delaware Corporation; and DOES 1-

10, inclusive, 

Defendants. 

______________________________

)

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

)

CASE NO.

1:10-cv-00304-OWW-SMS 

ORDER RE: STIPULATION OF 

THE PARTIES EXTENDING 

TIME OF DEFENDANT 

AMETEK TO FILE ANSWER 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 1:10-cv-00304-OWW -SKO Document 8 Filed 03/29/10 Page 1 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO ANSWER 

2

Law Offices of: 

Sayre & Levitt, LLP 

MANQUERO, DAMIAN MANQUERO, ANTONIO MANQUERO, 

FRANCISCO MANQUERO, ESTATE OF ANTHONY MANQUERO, 

(hereinafter collectively “Plaintiffs”), and Gregory C. Read, Esq., SEDGWICK, 

DETERT, MORAN AND ARNOLD, LLP, for Defendant AMETEK 

INCORPORATED, (hereinafter “Defendant”) and, with the authority of their 

respective clients, stipulate as follows: 

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED as follows:

1. The parties have met and conferred regarding the filing of a responsive 

pleading; 

2. As represented by Defense counsel, his schedule is restricted as a result of 

trial and travel commitments; 

3. Due to an administrative error, an outmoded form for acknowledging receipt 

of summons was used which makes reference to a Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 

that no longer exists; 

4. Defendant AMETEK INCORPORATED shall have 60 days from date of 

service of Summons and Complaint on March 24, 2010 to file a responsive 

pleading; 

5. It is further agreed by and between the parties that this stipulation may be 

signed in counterpart and that a facsimile or electronic signature will be as valid as 

an original signature. 

DATED: March 25, 2010 SAYRE & LEVITT, LLP

 By: _/s/ Tyler R. Dowdall, Esquire

 Federico C. Sayre 

 Tyler R. Dowdall 

 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 1:10-cv-00304-OWW -SKO Document 8 Filed 03/29/10 Page 2 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO ANSWER 

3

Law Offices of: 

Sayre & Levitt, LLP 

DATED: March 25, 2010 SEDGWICK, DETERT, MORAN & 

ARNOLD, LLP

 By: /s/ Gregory C. Read, Esquire

 Gregory C. Read 

 Attorneys Defendants

ORDER

The parties having stipulated that Defendant shall have 60 days from receipt 

of summons and complaint to file a responsive pleading, and good cause appearing 

therefore, IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: March 29, 2010 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 1:10-cv-00304-OWW -SKO Document 8 Filed 03/29/10 Page 3 of 3