Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca8-19-03081/USCOURTS-ca8-19-03081-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
3M Company
Appellee
3M Company Employee Retirement Income Plan
Appellee
James Richard Huntsman
Appellant
Zenith Annette Huntsman
Appellee

Document Text:

United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 19-3081

___________________________

James Richard Huntsman

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant

v.

3M Company, a Delaware corporation; 3M Company Employee Retirement

Income Plan; Zenith Annette Huntsman; Plan Administrator for the 3M Employee

Retirement Income Plan

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellees

 ____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the District of Minnesota

 ____________

 Submitted: June 1, 2020

Filed: June 4, 2020

[Unpublished]

____________

Before COLLOTON, BEAM, and ERICKSON, Circuit Judges. 

____________

PER CURIAM.

Appellate Case: 19-3081 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/04/2020 Entry ID: 4919962
James Huntsman appeals after the district court1

 dismissed his action asserting

claims related to a series of Minnesota court orders modifying his spousal

maintenance obligations. Upon careful review of the record and the parties’

arguments on appeal, we find no basis for reversal. See Newcombe v. United States,

933 F.3d 915, 917 (8th Cir. 2019) (standard of review). Accordingly, we affirm. See

8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________

1The Honorable Paul A. Magnuson, United States District Judge for the District

of Minnesota.

-2-

Appellate Case: 19-3081 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/04/2020 Entry ID: 4919962