Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_19-cv-00638/USCOURTS-caed-2_19-cv-00638-4/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Enoch Conners
Petitioner
Pfeiffer
Respondent

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ENOCH CONNERS,

Petitioner,

v.

PFEIFFER,

Respondent.

No. 2:19-cv-0638 KJM DB P

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas 

corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. By order dated July 31, 2019, the court screened and 

dismissed the original petition. (ECF No. 12.) Petitioner was granted thirty days leave to file an 

amended petition. Thereafter, no amended petition was filed on the docket and the court 

recommended that this action be dismissed. (ECF No. 13.)

Petitioner then filed objections stating that he was unable to respond to the court’s order 

because he was transferred on October 17, 2019. (ECF No. 14.) Petitioner also requested 

additional time to file an amended petition. The court vacated the findings and recommendations 

and granted petitioner thirty days leave to file an amended petition. (ECF No. 15.) Those thirty 

days have passed, and petitioner has not filed an amended petition, requested additional time to 

file an amended petition, updated his address, or otherwise responded to the court’s orders. 

////

Case 2:19-cv-00638-KJM-DB Document 16 Filed 02/19/20 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Accordingly, the court will recommend that this action be dismissed for failure to 

prosecute and failure to comply with court orders. See E.D. Cal. R. 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed.

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 

after being served with these findings and recommendations, petitioner may file written 

objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned

“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Petitioner is advised that 

failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District 

Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

Dated: February 18, 2020 

DLB:12

DLB:1/Orders/Prisoner/Habeas/conn0638.f&r.dism

Case 2:19-cv-00638-KJM-DB Document 16 Filed 02/19/20 Page 2 of 2