Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_06-cv-03425/USCOURTS-cand-4_06-cv-03425-13/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Avon Products, Inc.
Defendant
Arnett Moore
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE REQUEST FOR ORDER TO CHANGE TIME 1 CASE NO. C-06-03425 SBA (EMC) 

wc-133846

ROBERT A. NAEVE (CA SBN 106095) 

RNaeve@mofo.com 

STEVEN M. ZADRAVECZ (CA SBN 185676) 

SZadravecz@mofo.com 

MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP

19900 MacArthur Blvd. 

Irvine, California 92612-2445 

Telephone: 949.251.7500 

Facsimile: 949.251.0900 

KATHRYN M. DAVIS (CA SBN 203454) 

KathrynDavis@mofo.com 

MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP

101 Ygnacio Valley Road, Suite 450 

Walnut Creek, California 94596-8130 

Telephone: 925.295.3300 

Facsimile: 925.946.9912 

Attorneys for Defendant 

AVON PRODUCTS, INC. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

OAKLAND DIVISION 

ARNETT MOORE, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

AVON PRODUCTS, INC., a New York 

Corporation; and Does I through X, 

Defendant. 

Case No. C-06-03425 SBA (EMC) 

STIPULATION AND ORDER 

REGARDING ENLARGING TIME 

FOR AVON TO SUBMIT ITS BILL 

OF COSTS AND FILE ITS MOTION 

FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES 

PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 6-2 

Ctrm: #3, 3rd Floor (Oakland) 

Judge: Hon. Saundra Brown Armstrong 

Case 4:06-cv-03425-SBA Document 104 Filed 10/17/07 Page 1 of 4
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE REQUEST FOR ORDER TO CHANGE TIME 2 CASE NO. C-06-03425 SBA (EMC) 

wc-133846

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-2 of the United States District Court for the Northern 

District of California, Plaintiff Arnett Moore (“Moore”) and Defendant Avon Product, Inc. 

(“Avon”) enter into this Stipulation and Proposed Order with reference to the following facts. 

RECITALS

1. On October 4, 2007, this Court granted defendant Avon’s motion for summary 

judgment in its entirety. On the same day, this Court also entered Final Judgment in this action in 

accordance with its Order on Avon’s Summary Judgment Motion. 

2. As the prevailing party in this litigation, Avon anticipated filing a bill of costs and 

a motion to recover attorneys’ fees. Pursuant to the Civil Local Rules of the United Sates District 

Court for the Northern District of California, Rules 54-1 and 54-6, Avon’s bill of costs and its 

motion for attorneys’ fees are due October 18, 2007. 

3. In an attempt to avoid filing of the bill of costs and the motion for attorneys fees, 

and to reach a resolution on those two issues with Moore, Avon has met and confer with Moore’s 

counsel. 

4. Moore and his counsel are considering the proposals offered by Avon during the 

meet and confer process. However, as of the filing of this Stipulation, Moore’s counsel not been 

able to meet with Moore to fully discuss Avon’s proposal, and Moore and his counsel are now 

unavailable for the next several days. To facilitate the meet and confer process, and to allow time 

for a possible resolution, the parties stipulate as follows. 

STIPULATION

1. Avon shall have a two-week extension of time, up to and including November 1, 

2007 to file and serve its bill of costs. 

/// 

/// 

Case 4:06-cv-03425-SBA Document 104 Filed 10/17/07 Page 2 of 4
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE REQUEST FOR ORDER TO CHANGE TIME 3 CASE NO. C-06-03425 SBA (EMC) 

wc-133846

2. Avon shall have a two-week extension of time, up to and including November 1, 

2007 to file and serve any motion to recover attorneys’ fees and costs. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

Dated: October 15, 2007 ROBERT A. NAEVE 

STEVEN M. ZADRAVECZ 

KATHRYN M. DAVIS 

MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP

By: /s/ Kathryn M. Davis 

Kathryn M. Davis 

Attorneys for Defendant AVON PRODUCTS, INC. 

Dated: October 15, 2007 JODY LeWITTER 

SARAH BEARD 

SIEGEL & LeWITTER 

By: /s/ Jody LeWitter 

Jody LeWitter 

Attorneys for Plaintiff ARNETT MOORE 

ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED: 

Dated: 10/17/07__________ 

 Hon. Saundra Brown Armstrong 

JUDGE OF THE UNITED STATED 

DISTRICT COURT 

Case 4:06-cv-03425-SBA Document 104 Filed 10/17/07 Page 3 of 4
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE REQUEST FOR ORDER TO CHANGE TIME 4 CASE NO. C-06-03425 SBA (EMC) 

wc-133846

I, Kathryn M. Davis, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file this 

stipulation. In compliance with General Order 45, X.B., I hereby attest that Jody LeWitter has 

concurred in this filing. 

Case 4:06-cv-03425-SBA Document 104 Filed 10/17/07 Page 4 of 4