Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-01197/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-01197-2/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Manuel Ayala Alvarez
Plaintiff
Gregory
Defendant
Johnson
Defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MANUEL AYALA ALVAREZ,

Plaintiff, 2:06-cv-1197-GEB-EFB-PS

vs.

DEPUTY GREGORY, Badge #2520;

SGT. JOHNSON, Badge #68,

Defendants. ORDER

__________________________________/

On September 19, 2006, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations

herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the

findings and recommendations were to be filed within ten days. No objections were filed.

 Accordingly, the court presumes any findings of fact are correct. See Orland v.

United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1999). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are

reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir.

1983).

The court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and, good cause appearing,

concludes that it is appropriate to adopt the proposed Findings and Recommendations in full.

\\\\\

\\\\\

Case 2:06-cv-01197-GEB-EFB Document 6 Filed 10/24/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that:

1. The proposed Findings and Recommendations filed September 19, 2006, are

ADOPTED; and

2. This action is dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 11-110; Fed. R.

Civ. P. 41(b).

Dated: October 23, 2006

 

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.

United States District Judge

Case 2:06-cv-01197-GEB-EFB Document 6 Filed 10/24/06 Page 2 of 2