Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-16-06610/USCOURTS-ca4-16-06610-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Jan Stevens
Appellant
United States of America
Appellee

Document Text:

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-6610

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

JAN STEVENS,

 Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Liam O’Grady, District 

Judge. (1:10-cr-00446-LO-3)

Submitted: October 20, 2016 Decided: November 3, 2016

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jan Stevens, Appellant Pro Se. Kellen Sean Dwyer, OFFICE OF THE 

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 16-6610 Doc: 12 Filed: 11/03/2016 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Jan Stevens appeals the district court’s order denying his 

post-judgment motion to correct a clerical error. We have 

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, 

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United 

States v. Stevens, No. 1:10-cr-00446-LO-3 (E.D. Va. Mar. 18, 

2016). We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dispense 

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Appeal: 16-6610 Doc: 12 Filed: 11/03/2016 Pg: 2 of 2