Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_12-cv-06360/USCOURTS-cand-3_12-cv-06360-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Conductive Technologies, Inc.
Defendant
Decision Diagnostics Corp.
Defendant
Johnson & Johnson
Plaintiff
Lifescan, Inc.
Plaintiff
Pharmatech Solutions, Inc.
Defendant
Shasta Technologies, LLC
Defendant

Document Text:

1 

Case No.: 12-CV-06360 

ORDER RE: DEFENDANTS’ OPPOSITIONS TO MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

United States District Court 

For the Northern District of California 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN JOSE DIVISION 

LIFESCAN, INC. and 

JOHNSON & JOHNSON, 

Plaintiffs, 

vs. 

SHASTA TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, 

PHARMATECH SOLUTIONS, INC., 

DECISION DIAGNOSTICS CORP. and 

CONDUCTIVE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 

)

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

)

Case No.: 12-CV-06360 

ORDER RE: DEFENDANTS’ 

OPPOSITIONS TO MOTION FOR 

PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION 

On December 19, 2012, Plaintiffs Lifescan, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson (“Plaintiffs”) filed 

a Motion for a Preliminary Injunction (“Motion”) against Defendants Shasta Technologies, LLC 

(“Shasta”), Pharmatech Solutions, Inc. (“Pharmatech”), Decision Diagnostics Corp. (“Decision 

Corp.”), and Conductive Technologies, Inc. (“Conductive”). See ECF No. 14. On January 2, 

2013, Defendants Shasta and Conductive filed an Opposition to the Motion. See ECF No. 27. On 

the same date, Defendants Decision Corp. and Pharmatech filed a separate Opposition to the 

Motion. See ECF. No. 29. Defendants Shasta and Conductive’s Opposition incorporates by 

reference certain arguments made in Defendants Decision Corp. and Pharmatech’s Opposition. See

ECF No. 27 at 5. 

The Court hereby STRIKES Defendants’ separate Oppositions. The Court ORDERS that 

all Defendants file a joint Opposition no longer than 35 pages by January 21, 2013. Plaintiffs may 

Case 3:12-cv-06360-WHO Document 41 Filed 01/07/13 Page 1 of 2
2 

Case No.: 12-CV-06360 

ORDER RE: DEFENDANTS’ OPPOSITIONS TO MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

United States District Court 

For the Northern District of California 

file a Reply to the joint Opposition no longer than 17 pages by January 28, 2013. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 7, 2013 _________________________________ 

 LUCY H. KOH 

 United States District Judge 

Case 3:12-cv-06360-WHO Document 41 Filed 01/07/13 Page 2 of 2