Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-03428/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-03428-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Citi Mortgage, Inc
Counter-claimant
Linda Giusti-Mangiameli
Counter-defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LINDA GIUSTI-MANGIAMELI,

Plaintiff

 v.

CITI MORTGAGE, INC.,

Defendant

 /

No. C 06-3428 MMC

ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO

LODGE CHAMBERS COPIES IN

COMPLIANCE WITH GENERAL

ORDER 45 AND THE COURT’S

STANDING ORDERS

On July 21, plaintiff Linda Giusti-Mangiameli electronically filed opposition to

defendant Citi Mortgage, Inc.’s motion to transfer venue. Plaintiff has violated General

Order 45 and the Court’s Standing Orders, however, by failing to deliver to the Clerk’s

Office “no later than noon on the business day following the day that the papers are filed

electronically, one paper copy of each document that is filed electronically . . . marked

‘Chambers Copy’ and . . . clearly marked with the judge’s name, case number, and

‘Chambers Copy-Do Not File.’” See General Order 45 § VI.G; see also Standing Orders

For Civil Cases Assigned to The Honorable Maxine M. Chesney ¶ 2.

Plaintiff is hereby ORDERED to comply with General Order 45 and the Court’s

Standing Orders by immediately submitting a chambers copy of the above-referenced

document. Plaintiff is hereby advised that if she fails in the future to comply with the

Case 3:06-cv-03428-MMC Document 16 Filed 08/01/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Court’s Standing Order to provide chambers copies of electronically-filed documents, the

Court may impose sanctions, including, but not limited to, striking from the record any

electronically-filed document of which a chambers copy has not been timely provided to the

Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 1, 2006 

MAXINE M. CHESNEY

United States District Judge

Case 3:06-cv-03428-MMC Document 16 Filed 08/01/06 Page 2 of 2