Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_10-cv-00493/USCOURTS-caed-1_10-cv-00493-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
University of the Nations, Inc.
Defendant
Jaco Van Maanen
Plaintiff
YWAM-Office of the Founders
Defendant
YWAM-University of the Nations
Defendant
Youth With a Mission International, Inc.
Defendant
Youth With a Mission-Bishop
Defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JACO VAN MAANEN,

Plaintiff,

vs.

YOUTH WITH A MISSION-BISHOP; YOUTH 

WITH A MISSION INTERNATIONAL, INC. 

d/b/a YWAM-OFFICE OF THE FOUNDERS; 

UNIVERSITY OF THE NATIONS, INC. d/b/a 

YWAM-UNIVERSITY OF THE NATIONS, and

DOES 1-10,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 1:10-CV-00493 AWI JLT

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO 

CONTINUE SCHEDULING 

CONFERENCE

(DOC. 23)

Before the Court, is the stipulation of Plaintiff and defendant, Youth With A MissionBishop (“Bishop”), to continue the Scheduling Conference that is currently scheduled for July 7, 

2010. The stipulation indicates that Plaintiff has not served the other two named defendants due to 

his ongoing settlement discussions with them. Apparently, these discussions have now failed and 

Plaintiff is actively seeking to serve these remaining defendants. In the stipulation, Plaintiff asserts 

that service will be achieved by June 25, 2010. As a result of the failure of all parties to appear in 

the case and due to a scheduled vacation for counsel for Bishop, the parties request that the 

Scheduling Conference be continued.

Case 1:10-cv-00493-AWI-JLT Document 24 Filed 06/24/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Counsel for Plaintiff is reminded that the Order Setting Mandatory Scheduling Conference 

reads,

The Court is unable to conduct a scheduling conference until defendants have been 

served with the summons and complaint. Accordingly, plaintiff(s) shall diligently 

pursue service of summons and complaint and dismiss those defendants against 

whom plaintiff(s) will not pursue claims. Plaintiff(s) shall promptly file proofs of 

service of the summons and complaint so the Court has a record of service. Counsel 

are referred to F.R.Civ.P., Rule 4 regarding the requirement of timely service of the 

complaint. Failure to timely serve summons and complaint may result in the

imposition of sanctions, including the dismissal of unserved defendants.

(Doc 9 at 1-2) Based upon Plaintiff’s failure to serve the remaining defendants, the Court will not 

be able to have a meaningful scheduling conference on July 7, 2010. Thus, the Court has little 

option but to continue the conference to a later date.

Based thereon, the Court ORDERS that the Scheduling Conference, currently scheduled 

for July 7, 2010 will be reset on August 26, 2010, at 9 a.m. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 23, 2010 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE DEAC_Signature-END:

9j7khijed

Case 1:10-cv-00493-AWI-JLT Document 24 Filed 06/24/10 Page 2 of 2