Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00684/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00684-5/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Robert Benyamini
Petitioner
Teresa Schwartz
Respondent

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ROBERT BENYAMINI, )

)

)

)

Petitioner, )

)

vs. )

)

)

TERESA SCHWARTZ, )

)

)

Respondent. )

)

)

No. CV-F-05-684 REC/LJO HC

ORDER DENYING PETITIONER'S

MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION

(Doc. 20)

The court hereby denies petitioner's motion for

reconsideration of the Magistrate Judge's Order denying

petitioner's motion to reinstate claims and for appointment of

counsel.

With regard to the request to reinstate Claims Two, Four and

Five, Claim Two has not been dismissed for failure to exhaust. 

With regard to Claims Four and Five, the court reserved judgment

on the exhaustion of these claims pending the filing of a

response by respondent. Therefore, there is no need to reinstate

these claims because they have not yet been dismissed.

Case 1:05-cv-00684-LJO -GSA Document 21 Filed 12/19/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

With regard to petitioner's motion for appointment of

counsel, the court concludes that the Magistrate Judge's Order is

neither contrary to law nor clearly erroneous. The denial of the

motion was without prejudice and can be reconsidered after

respondent has filed a response to petitioner's petition.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: December 19, 2005 /s/ Robert E. Coyle 

668554 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:05-cv-00684-LJO -GSA Document 21 Filed 12/19/05 Page 2 of 2