Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-01929/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-01929-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Abrahan Olivas-Sepulbeda
Petitioner
Felecia Ponse
Respondent

Document Text:

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

ABRAHAN OLIVAS-SEPULBEDA, 

Petitioner, 

v. 

FELECIA PONSE, 

Respondent. 

No. 2:15-cv-1929-MCE-EFB (TEMP) P 

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 

 A recent court order was served on petitioner’s address of record and returned by the 

postal service. It appears that petitioner has failed to comply with Local Rule 182(f), which 

requires that a party appearing in propria persona inform the court of any address change. More 

than sixty-three days have passed since the court order was returned by the postal service and 

petitioner has failed to notify the Court of a current address. 

 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without 

prejudice for failure to prosecute. See Local Rule 183(b). 

 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 

after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written 

objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s 

Findings and Recommendations.” Any response to the objections shall be filed and served within 

Case 2:15-cv-01929-MCE-EFB Document 13 Filed 01/07/16 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2

fourteen days after service of the objections. The parties are advised that failure to file objections 

within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. 

Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: January 7, 2016. 

Case 2:15-cv-01929-MCE-EFB Document 13 Filed 01/07/16 Page 2 of 2