Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-09-07788/USCOURTS-ca4-09-07788-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Juan Evangelista Castro
Appellant
United States of America
Appellee

Document Text:

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 09-7788

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff – Appellee, 

 v. 

JUAN EVANGELISTA CASTRO, 

 Defendant – Appellant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of Virginia, at Harrisonburg. Samuel G. Wilson, 

District Judge. (5:06-cr-00054-sgw-mfu-1) 

Submitted: January 27, 2010 Decided: February 18, 2010 

Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. 

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Juan Evangelista Castro, Appellant Pro Se. Ryan Lee Souders, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Harrisonburg, Virginia, for 

Appellee. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 

Appeal: 09-7788 Doc: 6 Filed: 02/18/2010 Pg: 1 of 2
2 

PER CURIAM: 

Juan Evangelista Castro appeals from the district 

court’s garnishment disposition order directing the Virginia 

State Police to pay the Government $9,849. We have reviewed the 

record and find no reversible error.* Accordingly, we affirm for 

the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. 

Castro, No. 5:06-cr-00054-sgw-mfu-1 (W.D. Va. Sept. 9, 2009). 

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

AFFIRMED

 *

 Although Castro appears to correctly assert that the 

garnishee improperly failed to serve him with its answer to the 

garnishment writ, Castro fails to explain on appeal the 

objections he would have raised to the answer had he been 

served. Because Castro fails to show prejudice, we conclude 

that the irregularity in the processing of the garnishment 

action was harmless. 

Appeal: 09-7788 Doc: 6 Filed: 02/18/2010 Pg: 2 of 2