Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca10-16-01384/USCOURTS-ca10-16-01384-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Daniel Adolph Rodriguez
Appellant
United States of America
Appellee

Document Text:

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT 

_________________________________ 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff - Appellee, 

v. 

DANIEL ADOLPH RODRIGUEZ, 

 Defendant - Appellant. 

No. 16-1384 

(D.C. Nos. 1:16-CV-01444-RM and 

1:14-CR-00377-RM-1) 

(D. Colo.) 

_________________________________ 

ORDER AND JUDGMENT

_________________________________ 

Before MATHESON, BACHARACH, and PHILLIPS, Circuit Judges. 

_________________________________ 

This matter comes on for consideration of the government’s Fed. R. App. P. 28(j) 

letter in which the government informs the court of the Supreme Court decision in 

Beckles v. United States, ___ S. Ct. ___, 2017 WL 855781 (March 6, 2017), and the 

defendant’s “Statement Re: Beckles,” in which the defendant states that he “agrees with 

the Government that Beckles forecloses relief in this case.” 

Upon consideration thereof, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. 

 

 This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of 

law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. It may be cited, however, for its 

persuasive value consistent with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 and 10th Cir. R. 32.1. 

FILED 

United States Court of Appeals 

Tenth Circuit 

March 28, 2017

Elisabeth A. Shumaker 

Clerk of Court

Appellate Case: 16-1384 Document: 01019785942 Date Filed: 03/28/2017 Page: 1 
2 

The mandate shall issue forthwith. 

Entered for the Court 

Per Curiam 

Appellate Case: 16-1384 Document: 01019785942 Date Filed: 03/28/2017 Page: 2