Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caDC-24-07083/USCOURTS-caDC-24-07083-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Central District Station
Appellee
Matthew Jones
Appellant

Document Text:

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

____________

No. 24-7083 September Term, 2024

1:24-cv-00353-UNA

Filed On: September 4, 2024

Matthew Jones,

Appellant

v.

Central District Station,

Appellee

ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

BEFORE: Katsas, Pan, and Garcia, Circuit Judges

J U D G M E N T

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court

for the District of Columbia and on the brief filed by appellant. See Fed. R. App. P.

34(a)(2); D.C. Cir. Rule 34(j). It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s order dated April 25, 2024,

be affirmed. The district court properly dismissed the case as frivolous because the

complaint’s allegations lacked an arguable basis in law or fact. See Neitzke v. Williams,

490 U.S. 319, 325 (1989); see also 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) (providing that “the

court shall dismiss the case at any time if the court determines that . . . the action or

appeal . . . is frivolous or malicious”).

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk

is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution

USCA Case #24-7083 Document #2073028 Filed: 09/04/2024 Page 1 of 2
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

____________

No. 24-7083 September Term, 2024

of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R. App.

P. 41(b); D.C. Cir. Rule 41.

Per Curiam

FOR THE COURT:

Mark J. Langer, Clerk 

BY: /s/

Daniel J. Reidy 

Deputy Clerk

Page 2

USCA Case #24-7083 Document #2073028 Filed: 09/04/2024 Page 2 of 2