Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_05-cr-00648/USCOURTS-cand-4_05-cr-00648-17/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Donti Cooper
Defendant
Maurice Frazier
Defendant
USA
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND ORDER RESCHEDULING STATUS

CONFERENCE; EXCLUDING TIME

KEVIN V. RYAN (CASBN 118321)

United States Attorney

MARK L. KROTOSKI (CASBN 138549)

Chief, Criminal Division

GARTH HIRE (CASBN 187330)

JAMES E. KELLER (NYSBN 2893881)

Assistant United States Attorneys

1301 Clay Street, Suite 340-S

Oakland, California 94612-5217

Telephone: (510) 637-3929

Facsimile: (510) 637-3724

E-Mail: Garth.Hire@usdoj.gov

Attorneys for Plaintiff

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

OAKLAND DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

DONTI COOPER, and

MAURICE FRAZIER,

Defendants.

 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CR 05-00648 MJJ

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]

ORDER VACATING CURRENT STATUS

CONFERENCE AND RESCHEDULING

HEARING AND EXCLUDING TIME 

OAKLAND VENUE

Plaintiff, by and through its attorney of record, and defendants, by and through their

attorneys of record, hereby stipulate and ask the Court to find as follows:

1. On November 9, 2006, a hearing was held at which time the parties explained to

the Court that new information produced in discovery would impact the currently pending

motions to suppress and to disclose the confidential informant at that defendants needed

additional time to review and analyze that information and possibly file new motions regarding

Franks issues and/or withdraw some previously filed motions. 

2. At that time, the Court set the matter for status conference on December 7, 2006. 

Government counsel, namely Assistant United States Attorney Garth Hire, indicated, however,

Case 4:05-cr-00648-MJJ Document 97 Filed 12/05/2006 Page 1 of 3
 Case 4:05-cr-00648-MJJ Document 98 Filed 12/06/06 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 I hereby attest that I have on file all the holograph signatures for any signatures indicated

1

by a “conformed” signature (/s/) within this e-filed document.

STIPULATION AND ORDER RESCHEDULING STATUS

CONFERENCE; EXCLUDING TIME 2

that he would not be available for a hearing on that date but would check to see if the other

Assistant United States Attorney assigned to the case, James Keller, would be available. 

Unfortunately, AUSA Keller is also out of the district on that date.

3. Due to the unavailability of both government counsel on the currently scheduled

status conference date, and the need for defendants to continue to review and analyze recent

discovery material impacting the pending motions, the defendants request, and the parties hereby

stipulate, to vacate the currently scheduled status conference and reschedule the hearing for 

2:00 p.m. on December 21, 2006, in San Francisco, California. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

DATE: December 4, 2006 Respectfully submitted,

KEVIN V. RYAN

United States Attorney

 /s/ 

1

GARTH HIRE

JAMES E. KELLER

Assistant United States Attorneys

Attorneys for Plaintiff

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

 /s/ /s/ 

SUZANNE LUBAN, ESQ. JOHN PAUL REICHMUTH, ESQ.

Assistant Federal Public Defender

Counsel for Donti Cooper

Counsel for Maurice Frazier

Case 4:05-cr-00648-MJJ Document 97 Filed 12/05/2006 Page 2 of 3
 Case 4:05-cr-00648-MJJ Document 98 Filed 12/06/06 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND ORDER RESCHEDULING STATUS

CONFERENCE; EXCLUDING TIME 3

[PROPOSED] ORDER

FOR GOOD CAUSE SHOWN, THE COURT ADOPTS THE FINDINGS OF FACT AND

CONCLUSIONS OF LAW STIPULATED TO BY THE PARTIES. THEREFORE, IT IS SO

FOUND AND ORDERED THAT: 

1. The currently scheduled December 7, 2006, status conference is vacated. The

status conference is continued to 2:00 p.m. on December 21, 2006, in Courtroom 11 of the

United States Courthouse in San Francisco, California.

2. The time period from December 7, 2006, to December 21, 2006, is deemed

excludable pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(1)(F) because that period of delay results from the

filing of pre-trial motions and encompasses the period of time from the filing of those motions

through the conclusion of the hearing on, or other prompt disposition of, such motions. The

Court finds that nothing in this stipulation and order shall preclude a finding that other provisions

of the Speedy Trial Act dictate that additional time periods are excludable from the period within

which trial must commence.

DATED: 

HONORABLE MARTIN J. JENKINS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 4:05-cr-00648-MJJ Document 97 Filed 12/05/2006 Page 3 of 3

12/6/2006

Case 4:05-cr-00648-MJJ Document 98 Filed 12/06/06 Page 3 of 3