Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cr-00380/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cr-00380-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
USA
Plaintiff
Omar Ward
Defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER 1

CR 06-0380 SI

KEVIN V. RYAN (CSBN 118321)

United States Attorney

MARK L. KROTOSKI (CSBN 138549) 

Chief, Criminal Division

NAHLA RAJAN (CSBN 218838)

Special Assistant United States Attorney

450 Golden Gate Avenue, Box 36055

San Francisco, California 94102-3495

Telephone: (415) 436-6838

Facsimile: (415) 436-7234

Email: nahla.rajan@usdoj.gov

Attorneys for Plaintiff

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

OMAR WARD,

Defendant.

 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

) 

No. CR 06-0380 SI 

[PROPOSED] ORDER AND

STIPULATION EXCLUDING TIME

FROM THE SPEEDY TRIAL ACT

CALCULATION 

(18 U.S.C. § 3161 (h)(8)(A))

The parties stipulate and agree, and the Court finds and holds, as follows:

1. The parties appeared on the instant matter July 13, 2006 for defendant’s arraignment

on the indictment before the Honorable Judge Nandor Vadas. On July 13, 2006, the matter was

continued to July 14, 2006 for initial appearance in front of the Honorable Susan Illston.

2. On July 14, 2006, the parties appeared in front of the Honorable Susan Illston and the

matter was continued to July 28, 2006 for status / trial setting. 

3. On July 14, 2006, Assistant Federal Public Defender Ronald Tyler, who represents the

defendant, requested an exclusion of time from July 14, 2006 to July 28, 2006, based on effective

Case 3:06-cr-00380-SI Document 4 Filed 07/26/2006 Page 1 of 2
 Case 3:06-cr-00380-SI Document 5 Filed 07/28/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER 2

CR 06-0380 SI

preparation of counsel. The parties moved that this same time period be excluded from the

calculation of time under the Speedy Trial Act.

4. In light of the foregoing facts, the failure to grant the requested exclusion would

unreasonably deny counsel for the defense the reasonable time necessary for effective

preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. See 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(A),

(B)(iv). The ends of justice would be served by the Court excluding the proposed time period. 

These ends outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. See id. §

3161(h)(8)(A).

5. For the reasons stated, the time period from July 14, 2006 through July 28, 2006 shall

be excluded from the calculation of time under the Speedy Trial Act.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

DATED: July 14, 2006 Respectfully Submitted,

 /S/ 

NAHLA RAJAN

Special Assistant United States Attorney

DATED: July 19, 2006 /S/ 

RONALD TYLER

Counsel for Omar Ward

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: _________________ ____________________________________

THE HONORABLE SUSAN ILLSTON

United States District Judge

Case 3:06-cr-00380-SI Document 4 Filed 07/26/2006 Page 2 of 2
 Case 3:06-cr-00380-SI Document 5 Filed 07/28/06 Page 2 of 2