Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-00642/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-00642-3/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Cedric Greene
Plaintiff
S. Sandaval
Defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CEDRIC GREENE,

Plaintiff,

v.

S. SANDAVAL, 

Defendant.

 /

CASE NO. 1:07-cv-00642-AWI-NEW (DLB) PC

ORDER ADOPTING FINDING AND

RECOMMENDATION, AND DISMISSING

ACTION, WITH PREJUDICE, FOR FAILURE

TO STATE A CLAIM UPON WHICH RELIEF

MAY BE GRANTED UNDER SECTION 1983

(Docs. 1 and 9)

Plaintiff Cedric Greene (“plaintiff”) is a former state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma

pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United

States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72-302.

On July 6, 2007, the Magistrate Judge filed a Finding and Recommendation herein which was

served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objection to the Finding and

Recommendation was to be filed within thirty days. Plaintiff filed an Objection on July 23, 2007.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 73-305, this

Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the

Court finds the Findings and Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Plaintiff’s contention that the deprivation of a single meal rises to the level of an Eighth Amendment

violation is without merit. Farmer v. Brennan, 511 U.S. 825, 837-45 (1994); Hudson v. McMillian,

503 U.S. 1, 8-9 (1992).

///

Case 1:07-cv-00642-AWI-LJO Document 11 Filed 07/30/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Finding and Recommendation, filed July 6, 2007, is adopted in full; and

2. This action is dismissed, with prejudice, for failure to state a claim upon which relief

may be granted under section 1983.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 27, 2007 /s/ Anthony W. Ishii 

0m8i78 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:07-cv-00642-AWI-LJO Document 11 Filed 07/30/07 Page 2 of 2