Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_09-cv-01899/USCOURTS-caed-2_09-cv-01899-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Nancy Hankins
Plaintiff
Universal Recovery Corporation
Defendant

Document Text:

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

- 1 - ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 

Mark E. Ellis - 127159 

Kimberly E. Lewellen - 243663 

ELLIS, COLEMAN, POIRIER, LAVOIE, 

 & STEINHEIMER LLP 

555 University Avenue, Suite 200 East 

Sacramento, CA 95825 

Tel: (916) 283-8820 

Fax: (916) 283-8821 

mellis@ecplslaw.com 

klewellen@ecplslaw.com 

Attorneys for Defendant UNIVERSAL RECOVERY CORPORATION 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SACRAMENTO DIVISION 

NANCY HANKINS, 

 Plaintiff, 

v. 

UNIVERSAL RECOVERY CORPORATION, 

 Defendant. 

Case No.: 2:09-cv-01899-FCD-KJM 

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO SET 

ASIDE FRCP 68 JUDGMENT AND TO 

DISMISS THE CASE WITH PREJUDICE 

PURSUANT TO FRCP 41. 

DATE: March 26, 2010 

TIME: 10:00 a.m. 

JUDGE: Frank C. Damrell Jr. 

COURTROOM: 02

Whereas this Court previously entered Judgment against Defendant Universal Recovery 

Corporation pursuant to Plaintiff’s Acceptance of a Fed. R. Civ. P., Rule 68 Offer of Judgment. 

Whereas Plaintiff Nancy Hankins anticipates filing a Petition for Attorney’s Fees and Costs if 

the parties cannot agree to an amount, as provided in the Rule 68 Offer of Judgment, 

Whereas the parties have entered into a settlement agreement which wholly disposes of this 

action, including but not limited to, any claim by Plaintiff Nancy Hankins for attorney’s fees and costs. 

Whereas the parties agree that the Judgment be set aside so that the parties can effectuate the 

settlement agreement. 

Whereas the parties agree that neither will be prejudiced should the Court set aside the Rule 68 

Judgment. 

Whereas pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1), and the executed settlement 

Case 2:09-cv-01899-FCD-KJM Document 16 Filed 01/25/10 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

- 2 - ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 

agreement, the parties agree that this case be dismissed with prejudice and without any fees and/or 

costs to any party. 

It is so stipulated. 

Dated: January 22, 2010 KROHN & MOSS LTD. 

/s/ Ryan Lee, Esq. 

Ryan Lee, Esq. 

Attorney for Plaintiff 

Nancy Hankins. 

Dated: January 22, 2010 ELLIS, COLEMAN, POIRIER, LAVOIE, & 

STEINHEIMER LLP 

 /s/ Kimberly E. Lewellen _

Kimberly E. Lewellen 

Attorney Defendant 

Universal Recovery Corporation. 

Pursuant to the Stipulation of the parties, and the motion to set aside judgment filed 

concurrently herewith, 

IT IS ORDERED that the Rule 68 Judgment entered on or about November 16, 2009, be set 

aside, and that this action be dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1). 

Dated: January 25, 2010 

Case 2:09-cv-01899-FCD-KJM Document 16 Filed 01/25/10 Page 2 of 2