Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-06352/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-06352-2/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Moises Hernandez
Petitioner
Joe McGrath
Respondent

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MOISES HERNANDEZ, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

v. )

)

JOE McGRATH, Warden, )

)

Respondent. )

)

)

)

)

 )

1:04-cv-06352-OWW-SMS-HC

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT

TO SEND PETITIONER COPY OF

PROBATION REPORT (Doc. 20)

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS (Doc. 18)

ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR

WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO ENTER

JUDGMENT FOR RESPONDENT

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a

Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. 

On January 12, 2006, the Magistrate Judge filed Findings and

Recommendations that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus be

DENIED, and the Clerk of Court enter judgment in favor of

Respondent. These Findings and Recommendations were served on all

parties and contained notice that any objections were to be filed

within thirty (30) days from the date of service of that order. On

February 6, 2006, Petitioner filed objections to the Findings and

Recommendations.

Case 1:04-cv-06352-OWW -SMS Document 21 Filed 03/15/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636

(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a de novo review of the case. 

Having carefully reviewed the entire file, including Petitioner's

objections, the Court concludes that the Magistrate Judge's

Findings and Recommendations are supported by the record and proper

analysis. Petitioner's objections present no grounds for

questioning the Magistrate Judge's analysis.

On February 27, 2006, Petitioner filed a motion to unseal the

probation report and serve a copy on him. (Court Doc. 20.) It

appears that Petitioner is under the impression that because the

probation report is filed under seal, he is not entitled to receive

a copy of it; however, the probation report being filed under seal

merely prevents the public from viewing such document and does not

prevent the Court from sending a copy to Petitioner. Based on

this, the Court denies Petitioner’s request to unseal the probation

report and will direct the Clerk of Court to serve a copy of the

probation report on Petitioner. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Clerk of Court is directed to send Petitioner a copy

of the probation report filed under seal in this case; 

2. The Findings and Recommendations, filed January 12, 2006,

are ADOPTED IN FULL; 

3. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED; and,

4. The Clerk of Court enter judgment for Respondent.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 15, 2006 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger 

emm0d6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:04-cv-06352-OWW -SMS Document 21 Filed 03/15/06 Page 2 of 2