Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-00821/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-00821-12/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Bank of America Corporation
Defendant
Bank of America, N.A.
Defendant
Early Warning Services, LLC
Defendant
First Advantage Background Services Corp.
Defendant
Troy Jacques
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TROY JACQUES,

Plaintiff,

v.

BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION, 

a Delaware corporation, aka BANK OF 

AMERICA, N.A.; FIRST ADVANTAGE 

BACKGROUND SERVICES CORP., a 

Florida corporation; EARLY WARNING 

SERVICES, LLC, a Limited Liability 

company; and DOES 1 through 50,

Defendants.

CASE NO. 1:12-cv-00821-SAB 

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION: (1) 

ALLOWING DEFENDANT BANK OF 

AMERICA, N.A. TO FILE AMENDED 

ANSWER TO PLAINTIFF’S FOURTH

AMENDED COMPLAINT; (2) TO CONTINUE 

THE HEARING ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION 

TO STRIKE FROM SEPTEMBER 18 TO 

OCTOBER 2, 2013

Case 1:12-cv-00821-SAB Document 81 Filed 09/05/13 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Pursuant to the Joint Stipulation to: (1) allow Defendant BANK OF AMERICA 

CORPORATION (“Defendant”) to File Amended Answer to Plaintiff TROY JACQUES’ 

(“Plaintiff”) Fourth Amended Complaint; and (2) continue the hearing on Plaintiff’s Motion to 

Strike Defendant’s Affirmative Defenses submitted herewith, and good cause appearing, IT IS 

SO ORDERED that:

1. Defendant is allowed to file and serve an Amended Answer up to and including 

September 18, 2013; 

2. The hearing on Plaintiff’s Motion to Strike set for September 18, 2013 is 

continued to October 2, 2013 so that Defendant need not file an Opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion 

to Strike on September 4, 2013 and to preserve Plaintiff’s right to move forward with the Motion 

to Strike if for some reason an Amended Answer is not filed; and

3. Plaintiff also reserves the right to challenge Defendant’s Amended Answer, if 

deemed necessary and appropriate, pursuant to federal rules.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 5, 2013 _ _

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:12-cv-00821-SAB Document 81 Filed 09/05/13 Page 2 of 2