Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_14-cv-01920/USCOURTS-cand-4_14-cv-01920-5/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Audencio Maldonado
Petitioner
Daniel Paramo
Respondent

Document Text:

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

United States District Court 

Northern District of Californi

a

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

AUDENCIO MALDONADO,

Petitioner, 

v. 

DANIEL PARAMO, Warden, 

Respondent. 

Case No. 14-cv-01920-JSW 

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE 

MOTION TO DISMISS 

RE: DOCKET NO. 18 

On October 21, 2015, Respondent filed a motion to dismiss the Petition for a Writ of 

Habeas Corpus on the basis that the petition is barred by the statute of limitations. Although 

Respondent did not notice that motion for a hearing date, under the Northern District Civil Local 

Rules, Petitioner’s opposition to the motion would have been due on November 4, 2015. 

Petitioner did not file a response to the motion. 

Accordingly, Petitioner is HEREBY ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why the Court 

should not why should not grant the motion to dismiss as unopposed. If Petitioner seeks to file an 

untimely opposition brief to the motion to dismiss, he must show good cause for failing to comply 

with the Court’s deadlines, and he shall submit a proposed opposition brief with the request. 

Petitioner’s response to this Order to Show Cause shall be due by no later than December 11, 

2015. If the Court grants the request to file an untimely opposition brief, it will permit 

Respondent to file a reply. 

// 

// 

// 

// 

Case 4:14-cv-01920-JSW Document 19 Filed 11/13/15 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court 

Northern District of Californi

a

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

app

Da

Unless 

ropriate, the

IT IS S

ated: Novemb

the Court de

e motion to 

SO ORDER

ber 13, 2015

etermines tha

dismiss will

RED. 

5

2

at a hearing 

 be resolved

is required, 

 on the pape

__

JE

Un

the Order to

ers. 

___________

EFFREY S. W

nited States D

o Show Caus

__________

WHITE 

District Judg

se and, if 

____ 

e 

Case 4:14-cv-01920-JSW Document 19 Filed 11/13/15 Page 2 of 2