Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_16-cv-02985/USCOURTS-cand-4_16-cv-02985-6/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
S. Frauenheim
Respondent
Isidro Roman
Petitioner

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ISIDRO ROMAN,

Petitioner,

v.

S. FRAUENHEIM, Warden,

Respondent.

Case No. 16-cv-02985-HSG (PR)

ORDER DENYING AS UNNECESSARY

PETITIONER’S APPLICATION FOR 

EXTENSION OF TIME

Re: Dkt. No. 36

Petitioner’s application for an extension of time to file a certificate of appealability, which 

is construed as an application for an extension of time to file a notice of appeal, is DENIED as 

unnecessary. Petitioner has already filed a timely notice of appeal with the United States Court of 

Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. See Dkt. No. 33; Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(4) (a timely filed motion for 

reconsideration delays the time for filing a notice of appeal to 30 days from entry of the order 

deciding the motion). The Ninth Circuit has received the notice of appeal and will determine 

whether a certificate of appealability should issue. See Dkt. No. 35.

This Order terminates Dkt. No. 36. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated:

HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR.

United States District Judge

12/7/2017

Case 4:16-cv-02985-HSG Document 37 Filed 12/07/17 Page 1 of 1