Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_24-cv-02923/USCOURTS-caed-2_24-cv-02923-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Quoc H. Nguyen
Plaintiff
John Valender
Defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

QUOC H. NGUYEN,

Plaintiff,

v.

JOHN VALENDER,

Defendant.

No. 2:24-cv-02923-DC-AC (PS)

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND 

RECOMMENDATIONS AND DISMISSING 

THIS ACTION

(Doc. No. 3)

Plaintiff Quoc H. Nguyen is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil action. 

This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 

§ 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On October 30, 2024, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations 

recommending that this action be dismissed due to Plaintiff’s failure to state any cognizable legal 

claim against any defendant. (Doc. No. 3.) Further, the magistrate judge found “the complaint 

consists entirely of disconnected statements with no discernable meaning,” and “[t]he contents of 

the complaint are sufficiently unintelligible as to make it clear that leave to amend in this case 

would not be fruitful.” (Id. at 3.) Accordingly, the magistrate judge recommended that Plaintiff’s 

complaint be dismissed without leave to amend. (Id. at 4.)

Those findings and recommendations were served on Plaintiff and contained notice that 

any objections thereto were to be filed within twenty-one (21) days from the date of service. (Id.

Case 2:24-cv-02923-DC-AC Document 6 Filed 12/05/24 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

at 4.) To date, no objections to the pending findings and recommendations have been filed, and 

the time in which to do so has now passed.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this court has conducted a 

de novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court concludes that the 

findings and recommendations are supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, 

1. The findings and recommendations issued on October 30, 2024 (Doc. No. 3) are 

adopted in full; 

2. This action is dismissed, without leave to amend, due to Plaintiff’s failure to state 

a cognizable claim for relief; and

3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: December 4, 2024 ___________________________

Dena Coggins

United States District Judge

Case 2:24-cv-02923-DC-AC Document 6 Filed 12/05/24 Page 2 of 2