Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-16-01203/USCOURTS-ca4-16-01203-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Steven T. Corbin
Appellant
Lee J. Loftus and JMO Finance Staff
Appellee
Tilton & Bernstein Management
Appellee

Document Text:

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-1203

STEVEN T. CORBIN,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

LEE J. LOFTUS AND JMO FINANCE STAFF, Department of 

Justice/Justice Management Division; TILTON & BERNSTEIN 

MANAGEMENT,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

Maryland, at Greenbelt. Roger W. Titus, Senior District Judge. 

(8:15-cv-02118-RWT)

Submitted: November 7, 2016 Decided: November 28, 2016

Before MOTZ, DUNCAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Steven T. Corbin, Appellant Pro Se. Jane Elizabeth Andersen, 

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Allen F. Loucks, Assistant 

United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee Lee J. 

Loftus and JMO Finance Staff.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 16-1203 Doc: 43 Filed: 11/28/2016 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Steven T. Corbin appeals the district court’s order 

granting Lee J. Loftus and JMO Finance Staff’s motion to dismiss

pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) and dismissing his 

complaint as to all parties. We have reviewed the record and 

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant leave to 

proceed in forma pauperis and affirm substantially for the 

reasons stated by the district court.* Corbin v. Loftus, No. 

8:15-cv-02118-RWT (D. Md. Nov. 10, 2015). We also deny Corbin’s 

petitions for a writ of mandamus and his pending motions. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

 * To the extent that Corbin seeks to challenge the removal 

of another currently pending civil action, Corbin v. Lynch, No. 

8:16-cv-01495-RWT (D. Md. May 18, 2016), his notice of appeal 

did not designate a decision or judgment in that case, see Fed. 

R. App. P. 3(c)(1)(B), and there has been no ruling by the 

district court on a motion to remand.

Appeal: 16-1203 Doc: 43 Filed: 11/28/2016 Pg: 2 of 2