Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_05-cr-00622/USCOURTS-cand-4_05-cr-00622-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
USA
Plaintiff
Steven Demon Williams
Defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER

CR 05-00622 JSW

KEVIN V. RYAN (CSBN 118321)

United States Attorney

EUMI L. CHOI (WVBN 0722)

Chief, Criminal Division

SUSAN R. JERICH (CSBN 188462)

Assistant United States Attorney

450 Golden Gate Avenue, Box 36055

San Francisco, California 94102

Telephone: (415) 436-7158

Facsimile: (415) 436-7234

Email: susan.jerich@usdoj.gov

Attorneys for Plaintiff

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) No.: CR 05-00622 JSW

)

Plaintiff, ) PARTIES’ STIPULATION AND

) PROPOSED ORDER EXCLUDING

v. ) TIME UNDER SPEEDY TRIAL ACT

)

STEVEN DEMON WILLIAMS, )

)

Defendant. )

____________________________________)

The parties stipulate and agree, and the Court finds and holds, as follows:

1. The parties last appeared before this Court on November 3, 3005, for case status. 

At that time, counsel for the defendant indicated that there were some items of discovery that she

had not yet had an opportunity to review and discuss with her client. Counsel requested an

additional week in order to complete discovery review.

2. The matter was continued until November 10, 2005 at 2:30 p.m. Time was excluded by the

Court for effective preparation of counsel. .

3. The parties move that the time period from November 3, 2005 through November 10,

2005, be excluded from the calculation of time under the Speedy Trial Act due to effective

preparation of counsel.

Case 3:05-cr-00622-JSW Document 9 Filed 11/09/2005 Page 1 of 3 Case 4:05-cr-00622-JSW Document 10 Filed 11/09/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER

CR 05-00622 JSW 2

4. In light of the foregoing facts, the failure to grant the requested exclusion 

would unreasonably deny counsel for the defense the reasonable time necessary for effective

preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. See 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(A),

(B)(iv). The ends of justice would be served by the Court excluding the proposed time period. 

These ends outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. See id. §

3161(h)(8)(A).

5. For the reasons stated, the time period from November 3, 2005 through November 10,

2005, shall be excluded from the calculation of time under the Speedy Trial Act.

SO STIPULATED.

DATED: 11/03/05 Respectfully Submitted,

_/s/______________________________

SUSAN R. JERICH

Assistant United States Attorney

DATED: 11/8/05

_/s/_______________________________

ELIZABETH M. FALK

Counsel for Defendant

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: __________________________________

HON. JEFFREY S. WHITE

Judge, United States District Court

Case 3:05-cr-00622-JSW Document 9 Filed 11/09/2005 Page 2 of 3

November 9, 2005

Case 4:05-cr-00622-JSW Document 10 Filed 11/09/05 Page 2 of 2