Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_13-cv-00161/USCOURTS-caed-2_13-cv-00161-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Comtrak Logistics, Inc.
Defendant
Salvador Robles
Plaintiff

Document Text:

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER RE: FIRST AM. COMPL. AND RELATED MATTERS 

Case No. 2:13-CV-00161-JAM-AC

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

MARLIN & SALTZMAN, LLP 

Christina A. Humphrey, Esq. (SBN 226326) 

Leslie H. Joyner, Esq. (SBN 262705) 

29229 Canwood Street, Suite 208 

Agoura Hills, California 91301 

Telephone: (818) 991-8080 

Facsimile: (818) 991-8081 

chumphrey@marlinsaltzman.com

ljoyner@marlinsaltzmna.com

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

SEYFARTH SHAW LLP 

Brandon R. McKelvey, Esq. (SBN 217002) 

Timothy B. Nelson, Esq. (SBN 235279) 

400 Capitol Mall, Suite 2350 

Sacramento, California 95814-4428 

Telephone: (916) 448-0159 

Facsimile: (916) 558-4839 

bmckelvey@seyfarth.com

tnelson@seyfarth.com

SEYFARTH SHAW LLP 

Thomas J. Piskorski, Esq. (admitted pro hac vice) 

131 South Dearborn Street, Suite 2400 

Chicago, Illinois 60603 

Telephone: (312) 460-5000 

Facsimile: (312) 460-7000 

tpiskorski@seyfarth.com

Attorneys for Defendant 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - SACRAMENTO DIVISION 

SALVADOR ROBLES, individually and on 

behalf of others similarly situated, 

 Plaintiffs, 

v. 

COMTRAK LOGISTICS, INC., a Delaware 

corporation; and DOES 1 through 10, 

inclusive, 

 Defendants. 

) 

) 

)

)

)

)

) 

) 

) 

) 

)

) 

) 

)

CASE NO. 2:13-CV-00161-JAM-AC 

CLASS ACTION

STIPULATION AND ORDER RE: FIRST 

AMENDED COMPLAINT AND 

RELATED MATTERS 

Case 2:13-cv-00161-JAM-AC Document 23 Filed 04/23/13 Page 1 of 3
-2- 

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER RE: TOLLING AGREEMENT AND RELATED MATTERS 

Case No. 2:13-CV-00161-JAM-AC

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION

WHEREAS, on January 25, 2013, Plaintiff filed his Complaint. 

WHEREAS, Defendant filed its Motion to Dismiss the entire action on March 26, 2013, 

with a noticed hearing date of May 15, 2013; 

WHEREAS, Plaintiff anticipated filing a First Amended Complaint the same time 

Defendant filed its Motion to Dismiss, in order to add the same individual labor code claims on 

behalf of Plaintiff Robles for the time he spent as an employee of Defendant; 

WHEREAS, on April 15, 2013, the parties filed a Stipulation and Proposed Order RE: 

Tolling Agreement and Related Matters seeking to preserve the May 15, 2013, hearing date on 

Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss and to preserve Plaintiff’s right to file a First Amended Complaint 

pursuant to Fed. Rule Civ. Proc. 15(a)(1)(B) after the hearing on the Motion to Dismiss; 

WHEREAS, the deadline for Plaintiff to file a First Amended Complaint as a matter of right 

pursuant to Fed. Rule Civ. Proc. 15(a)(1)(B) was April 16, 2013; 

WHEREAS, the parties have reached the following agreement, each subpart below being 

material and necessary to the entire agreement; 

THEREFORE, the parties, through their respective counsel of record, agree to stipulate that; 

(a) Defendant will withdraw its current Motion to Dismiss; 

(b) Plaintiff will file a First Amended Complaint within fourteen (14) days of the date this 

Stipulation is filed; and 

(c) Defendant will have twenty-eight (28) days from the date Plaintiff files his First Amended 

Complaint to file its responsive pleading. 

Following which the normal briefing deadlines will govern, tied to the hearing date for the 

anticipated motion to dismiss. 

All parties further agree that the parties’ following arguments are reserved, and not in any 

way impacted by this Stipulation: 

(a) Plaintiff reserves the right to argue that Plaintiff’s labor code claims relating to his 

status as an employee relate back to the January 25, 2013, filing date of the original Complaint; and 

Case 2:13-cv-00161-JAM-AC Document 23 Filed 04/23/13 Page 2 of 3
-3- 

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER RE: TOLLING AGREEMENT AND RELATED MATTERS 

Case No. 2:13-CV-00161-JAM-AC

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

(b) Defendant’s arguments that Plaintiff’s claims do not relate back to the January 25, 

2013, filing date of the original Complaint, and all other defenses and arguments which Defendant 

had available as of the date this Stipulation is filed with the Court. Defendant also reserves all 

other available arguments in response to the original Complaint and any First Amended Complaint. 

DATED: April 22, 2013 MARLIN & SALTZMAN, LLP 

 

By: /S/ Christina A. Humphrey 

 Christina A. Humphrey, Esq. 

 Leslie H. Joyner, Esq. 

 Attorneys for Plaintiff 

DATED: April 22, 2013 SEYFARTH SHAW LLP 

 

 By: /S/ Timothy B. Nelson 

 Thomas J. Piskorski 

 Brandon R. McKelvey 

 Timothy B. Nelson 

 Attorneys for Defendant 

ORDER

Pursuant to stipulation of the parties and good cause appearing therefore, IT IS SO 

ORDERED.

DATED: 4/23/2013 /s/ John A. Mendez________________________

 JOHN A. MENDEZ 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 

Case 2:13-cv-00161-JAM-AC Document 23 Filed 04/23/13 Page 3 of 3