Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-15-07223/USCOURTS-ca4-15-07223-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Jermaine Brown
Appellant
United States of America
Appellee

Document Text:

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-7223

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

JERMAINE BROWN, a/k/a Jeezy,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Newport News. Rebecca Beach Smith, 

Chief District Judge. (4:09-cr-00063-RBS-TEM-10; 4:13-cv-00041-

RBS)

Submitted: December 17, 2015 Decided: December 22, 2015

Before DIAZ and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jermaine Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Edward Bradenham, II, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Timothy Richard Murphy, 

Special Assistant United States Attorney, Kristine Elizabeth 

Wolfe, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Newport News, 

Virginia; Gurney Wingate Grant, II, Assistant United States 

Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 15-7223 Doc: 8 Filed: 12/22/2015 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Jermaine Brown appeals from the district court’s orders 

construing his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion as an unauthorized 

successive 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion and dismissing it on 

that basis, and denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion. We 

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district 

court. United States v. Brown, Nos. 4:09-cr-00063-RBS-TEM-10; 

4:13-cv-00041-RBS (E.D. Va. Apr. 24, 2015; June 8, 2015). We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Appeal: 15-7223 Doc: 8 Filed: 12/22/2015 Pg: 2 of 2