Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-01663/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-01663-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
David Anthony Fallon
Plaintiff
United States Government
Defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DAVID ANTHONY FALLON,

Plaintiff, CIV. S-06-1663 JAM GGH PS

vs. CIV. S-06-1708 JAM GGH PS

UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT,

ORDER

Defendant. 

 /

On October 17, 2006, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations

herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the

findings and recommendations were to be filed within ten days. No objections were filed.

 Accordingly, the court presumes any findings of fact are correct. See Orland v.

United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1999). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are

reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir.

1983).

The court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and, good cause appearing,

concludes that it is appropriate to adopt the Proposed Findings and Recommendations in full.

\\\\\

\\\\\

Case 2:06-cv-01663-JAM-GGH Document 6 Filed 09/24/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that:

1. The Proposed Findings and Recommendations filed October 17, 2006, are

ADOPTED; and

2. These matters are dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. See Fed. R.

Civ. P. 12(h)(3).

DATED: 9/24/2008

/s/ John A. Mendez 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

fallon1663.jo

Case 2:06-cv-01663-JAM-GGH Document 6 Filed 09/24/08 Page 2 of 2