Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_13-cv-01506/USCOURTS-caed-1_13-cv-01506-6/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Amtrak
Plaintiff
BNSF Railway Company
Defendant
Jimenez Trucking
Defendant
National Railroad Passenger Corporation
Cross Defendant
Barbara Neu
Cross Defendant
Celia Ramirez
Plaintiff
Rigoberto Fernandez Jimenez
Defendant
Young's Commercial Transfer, Inc.
Defendant

Document Text:

1

Stipulation to Continue Expert Deadlines and Proposed Order

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Jeff Reich—067250

Shane Reich—222948

THE REICH LAW FIRM

304 BANNER COURT, SUITE 2

MODESTO, CA 95356

—

209-214-9640

Fax: 925-833-7266

Attorneys for Plaintiff

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – FRESNO DIVISION

NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER 

CORPORATION,

Plaintiff,

vs.

YOUNG'S COMMERCIAL TRANSFER, INC., 

a corporation, and RIGOBERTO FERNANDEZ 

JIMENEZ, an individual, 

d/b/a JIMENEZ TRUCKING, 

Defendants.

Case No. 1:13-CV-01506-AWI-GSA

(Consolidated with Case No. 

1:13-CV-02085-AWI-GSA)

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE 

DISCLOSURE OF REBUTTAL EXPERTS 

AND EXPERT DISCOVERY

DEADLINE and ORDER

COMPLAINT FILED: September 17, 2013

CELIA RAMIREZ,

Plaintiff,

vs.

RIGOBERTO FERNANDEZ JIMENEZ, 

JIMENEZ TRUCKING, NATIONAL 

RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION, 

BARBARA NEU, BNSF RAILWAY 

COMPANY, YOUNG'S COMMERCIAL 

TRANSFER, INC., and DOES 1 to 200, 

Inclusive, 

Defendants. COMPLAINT FILED: September 18, 2013

Case 1:13-cv-01506-DAD-EPG Document 44 Filed 11/17/15 Page 1 of 4
2

Stipulation to Continue Expert Deadlines and Order

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 The Reich Law Firm

304 BANNER COURT, STE 2

MODESTO, CA 95356

209-214-9640

The parties have met and conferred regarding discovery and mediation in this matter. The 

parties have made their initial expert designations with each party designating multiple experts. The 

parties are attempting to arrange a mediation to occur within the next 30 to 45 days and would like 

for that to occur before completing expert discovery and finalizing rebuttal expert disclosure. 

The continuance of the rebuttal expert disclosure, the expert discovery cutoff, and the nondispositive motion filing deadline allow this to be accomplished. This extension of time will not 

affect any other deadlines in the case. 

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto, through their respective 

attorneys of record that the dates in the Order on Amended Stipulation to Continue Trial Date and 

Discovery Deadlines dated October 26, 2015, be modified only insofar as the Rebuttal Expert 

Disclosure Date, Expert Discovery Cutoff, and Non-dispositive Motion Filing Deadline as follows:

Rebuttal Expert Disclosure: January 4, 2015

Expert Discovery Cutoff: February 5, 2016

Non-dispositive Motion Filing Deadline: February 5, 2016

Dispositive Motion Filing Deadline: February 26, 2016

Pretrial Conference: May 26, 2016

Time: 10:00 a.m.

Courtroom 2

Trial: July 26, 2016

Time: 8:30 a.m.

Courtroom 2

DATED: November 10, 2015 REICH LAW FIRM

By /s/ Shane Reich

Shane Reich

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

CELIA RAMIREZ

Case 1:13-cv-01506-DAD-EPG Document 44 Filed 11/17/15 Page 2 of 4
3

Stipulation to Continue Expert Deadlines and Order

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 The Reich Law Firm

304 BANNER COURT, STE 2

MODESTO, CA 95356

209-214-9640

DATED: November 10, 2015 LOMBARDI LOPER & CONANT, LLP 

By /s/ B. Clyde Hutchinson

Attorneys for Defendants, NATIONAL

RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION

aka AMTRAK, BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY 

and BARBARA ANN NEU

DATED: November 10, 2015 EMERSON · SORENSEN · CHURCH

By /s/ James D. Emerson

James D. Emerson

Attorneys for Defendants YOUNG'S 

COMMERCIAL TRANSFER, INC. and 

RIGOBERTO FERNANDEZ JIMENEZ,

individually and dba JIMENEZ TRUCKING

//

//

//

//

//

//

//

//

//

//

//

//

//

//

//

//

//

Case 1:13-cv-01506-DAD-EPG Document 44 Filed 11/17/15 Page 3 of 4
4

Stipulation to Continue Expert Deadlines and Order

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 The Reich Law Firm

304 BANNER COURT, STE 2

MODESTO, CA 95356

209-214-9640

ORDER

The Court, having considered the parties’ Stipulation to Continue Discovery Deadlines, and 

good cause appearing therein, orders the scheduling deadlines in this case be modified only insofar 

as the Rebuttal Expert Disclosure Date, Expert Discovery Cutoff, and Non-dispositive Motion 

Filing Deadline as follows:

Rebuttal Expert Disclosure: January 4, 2015

Expert Discovery Cutoff: February 5, 2016

Non-dispositive Motion Filing Deadline: February 5, 2016

All other deadlines, including the dispositive motion filing deadline, the pre-trial conference, 

and the trial date, remain as set forth in the Court’s Scheduling Order, issued on September 5, 2014 

(ECF No. 28), as amended by the Order on Amended Stipulation to Continue Trial Date and 

Discovery Deadlines, dated October 26, 2015 (ECF No. 43). 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: November 16, 2015 /s/

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:13-cv-01506-DAD-EPG Document 44 Filed 11/17/15 Page 4 of 4