Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca5-03-10783/USCOURTS-ca5-03-10783-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Jose Cruz Diaz-Camarillo
Appellant
United States of America
Appellee

Document Text:

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

March 23, 2004

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 03-10783

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JOSE CRUZ DIAZ-CAMARILLO,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northen District of Texas

USDC No. 4:03-CR-33-ALL-Y

--------------------

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Court-appointed counsel for Jose Cruz Diaz-Camarillo has

moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Diaz-Camarillo has

filed a response in which he raises several claims, including

claims of ineffective assistance of trial counsel. The record

has not been adequately developed for us to consider in this

direct appeal the ineffective assistance claims raised by Diaz-

 Case: 03-10783 Document: 0051630811 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/23/2004
No. 03-10783

-2-

Camarillo. See United States v. Higdon, 832 F.2d 312, 313-14

(5th Cir. 1987); see United States v. Price, 95 F.3d 364, 369

(5th Cir. 1996). 

Our independent review of counsel’s brief, Diaz-Camarillo’s

response, and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue for

appeal. Counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED,

counsel is excused from further responsibilities, and the appeal

is DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

MOTION GRANTED; APPEAL DISMISSED. 

 Case: 03-10783 Document: 0051630811 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/23/2004