Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-00349/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-00349-42/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Matthew Budine
Counter Claimant
CAN Technologies, Inc.
Counter Defendant
Cargill Incorporated
Counter Defendant
Douglas W. DeGroff
Defendant
Diversified Dairy Solutions, LLC
Defendant
Luciana Jonkman
Counter Claimant
Progressive Dairy Solutions, Inc.
Counter Claimant
Todd Schwegel
Defendant
Brian Sundberg
Counter Claimant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Michael G. Marderosian (SBN No. 07796) mick@mrcl-law.com

Brett L. Runyon (SBN No. 133501) brunyon@mrcl-law.com

Heather S. Cohen, Pro Hac Vice (WSBN No. 34400) heather@mrcl-law.com

MARDEROSIAN, RUNYON, CERCONE, 

LEHMAN & ARMO

1260 Fulton Mall

Fresno, CA 93721

Telephone: (559) 441-7991

Facsimile: (559) 441-8170

Michael J. Bidart (SBN No. 60582) mbidart@sbd-law.com

Ricardo Echeverria (SBN No. 166049) recheverria@sbd-law.com 

SHERNOFF, BIDART & DARRAS

600 S. Indian Hill Boulevard

Claremont, CA 91711

Telephone: (909) 621-4935

Facsimile: (909) 625-6915

Attorneys for: Defendants and Counter-Claimants MATTHEW BUDINE; LUCIANA

JONKMAN; BRIAN SUNDBERG; and PROGRESSIVE DAIRY

SOLUTIONS, INC.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA / FRESNO DIVISION

CARGILL INCORPORATED and CAN

TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,

Plaintiffs,

 v.

MATTHEW BUDINE, DOUGLAS W.

DEGROFF; DIVERSIFIED DAIRY

SOLUTIONS, LLC; LUCIANA JONKMAN;

PROGRESSIVE DAIRY SOLUTIONS,

INC.; TODD SCHWEGEL; BRIAN

SUNDBERG,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: 1:07-CV-00349 LJO 

ORDER FOR MISCELLANEOUS

RELIEF TO 

FILE DEFENDANTS’ SUR-REPLY TO

PLAINTIFFS’ REPLY BRIEF IN

SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION

FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

PURSUANT TO THE COURT’S

MAY 6, 2008, ORDER UNDER SEAL

AND RELATED COUNTER-CLAIM.

)

)

)

Case 1:07-cv-00349-LJO-SMS Document 267 Filed 05/12/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 MARDEROSIAN, RUNYON,

CERCONE, LEHMAN

& ARMO

1260 Fulton Mall

Fresno, CA 93721 2

GOOD CAUSE APPEARING THEREFOR, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the

Defendants’ Sur-Reply to Plaintiffs’ Reply Brief in Support of Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary

Judgment Pursuant to the Court’s May 6, 2008, Order shall be filed under seal.

///

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 12, 2008 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill 

b9ed48 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:07-cv-00349-LJO-SMS Document 267 Filed 05/12/08 Page 2 of 2