Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-14-02218/USCOURTS-ca4-14-02218-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
United States of America
Appellee
Edward R. Zinner
Appellant

Document Text:

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-2218

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

EDWARD R. ZINNER,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, Senior 

District Judge. (2:14-cv-00399-RGD-TEM)

Submitted: June 23, 2015 Decided: July 2, 2015

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Marvin D. Miller, LAW OFFICES OF MARVIN D. MILLER, Alexandria, 

Virginia; Louis Napoleon Joynes, II, JOYNES & GAIDIES, Virginia 

Beach, Virginia, for Appellant. Dana J. Boente, United States

Attorney, Mark A. Exley, Assistant United States Attorney, 

Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 14-2218 Doc: 27 Filed: 07/02/2015 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Edward R. Zinner appeals from the district court’s order 

dismissing his civil action for lack of subject matter 

jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record included on appeal, 

as well as the parties’ briefs, and find no error in the 

district court’s ruling. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons 

stated by the district court. United States v. Zinner, No. 

2:14-cv-00399-RGD-TEM (E.D. Va. Oct. 20, 2014). We dispense 

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Appeal: 14-2218 Doc: 27 Filed: 07/02/2015 Pg: 2 of 2