Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_99-cr-00447/USCOURTS-azd-2_99-cr-00447-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Ruben Chavez-Ibarra
Defendant
United States of America
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Ruben Chavez-Ibarra

Petitioner, 

vs.

United States of America, 

Respondent. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CV 05-0188-PHX-ROS

CR 99-0447

ORDER

On January 14, 2005 Petitioner filed a Motion To Vacate/Set Aside Sentence pursuant

to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Doc. #214, CR 99-0447). On April 27, 2005, Magistrate Judge Aspey

issued a Report and Recommendation ("R&R") recommending that the motion be denied

(Doc. #219, CR 99-0447). No objections were filed by either party.

The Court "may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or

recommendations made by the magistrate judge." 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). It is "clear that the

district judge must review the magistrate judge's findings and recommendations de novo if

objection is made, but not otherwise." United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121

(9th Cir. 2003) (en banc) (emphasis in original); Schmidt v. Johnstone, 263 F. Supp. 2d 1219,

1126 (D. Ariz. 2003) ("Following Reyna-Tapia, this Court concludes that de novo review of

factual and legal issues is required if objections are made, 'but not otherwise."'). District

courts are not required to conduct "any review at all . . . of any issue that is not the subject

Case 2:99-cr-00447-ROS Document 220 Filed 07/21/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

of an objection." Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985). No objection having been

made, the Court will adopt the R&R in full. 

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (Doc. #219, CR 99-0447)

is ADOPTED and the Motion To Vacate (Doc. #214, CR 99-0447) is DENIED.

DATED this 21st day of July, 2006.

Case 2:99-cr-00447-ROS Document 220 Filed 07/21/06 Page 2 of 2