Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-02870/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-02870-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Kim Holland
Respondent
Joseph Rhea
Petitioner

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOSEPH RHEA,

Petitioner,

v.

KIM HOLLAND,

Respondents.

No. 2:14-cv-2870 DAD P

ORDER

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

By an order filed December 15, 2014, petitioner was ordered to file an in forma pauperis 

affidavit or to pay the appropriate filing fee, within thirty days, or his application would be 

dismissed. The thirty day period has now expired, and petitioner has not responded to the court’s 

order, has not filed an in forma pauperis affidavit, and has not paid the appropriate filing fee. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is directed to 

randomly assign a United States District Judge to this action.

IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice.

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 

after being served with these findings and recommendations, petitioner may file written 

objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s 

Findings and Recommendations.” Petitioner is advised that failure to file objections within the

Case 2:14-cv-02870-TLN-DAD Document 4 Filed 01/27/15 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 

F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

Dated: January 27, 2015

DAD:9

rhea2870.fifp

Case 2:14-cv-02870-TLN-DAD Document 4 Filed 01/27/15 Page 2 of 2