Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-01098/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-01098-2/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Michael Hall
Plaintiff
Target Corporation
Defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MICHAEL HALL,

Plaintiff,

v.

TARGET CORPORATION,

Defendant.

No. 2:15-cv-1098 KJM CKD

ORDER

Defendant’s motion for protective order is pending before the court. Pursuant to the 

court’s order, defendant has submitted a document for in camera review. Upon review of the 

submitted document, upon review of the documents in support and opposition, upon hearing the 

arguments of counsel, and good cause appearing therefor, THE COURT ORDERS AS 

FOLLOWS:

1. The motion for protective order (ECF No. 14) is granted.

2. Plaintiff is granted leave to propound 40 interrogatories on the following subjects:

a. The terms *JREVIEW* and *JCOUNSL* as found on plaintiff’s personnel 

documents;

b. Defendant’s Human Resource Information System;

/////

/////

Case 2:15-cv-01098-KJM-CKD Document 25 Filed 03/30/16 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

c. Monitoring of terminations and corrective actions against employees at store T555 to ensure that employees over the age of 40, or those who took Family Medical Leave, are 

not targeted in violation of defendant’s written policies;

d. Reasonable accommodation policies; and

e. MAX notes.

Dated: March 30, 2016

4 hall1098.oah

_____________________________________

CAROLYN K. DELANEY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:15-cv-01098-KJM-CKD Document 25 Filed 03/30/16 Page 2 of 2