Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-19-02449/USCOURTS-ca4-19-02449-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Daniel Felix
Appellant
Christine Hutten
Appellant
IAT Insurance Group

Occidental Fire & Casualty Company of North Carolina

David Pirrung

Service Insurance Company
Appellee
US Attorney General

Document Text:

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-2449

DANIEL FELIX; CHRISTINE HUTTEN, 

Plaintiffs - Appellants, 

v. 

SERVICE INSURANCE COMPANY, 

Defendant - Appellee, 

and 

US ATTORNEY GENERAL; IAT INSURANCE GROUP; OCCIDENTAL FIRE 

& CASUALTY COMPANY OF NORTH CAROLINA; DAVID PIRRUNG, 

President, 

Defendants. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at 

Elizabeth City. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief District Judge. (2:18-cv-00031-BO) 

Submitted: May 18, 2020 Decided: May 27, 2020

Before NIEMEYER, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. 

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

USCA4 Appeal: 19-2449 Doc: 9 Filed: 05/27/2020 Pg: 1 of 3
2

Daniel Felix, Christine Hutten, Appellants Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 

USCA4 Appeal: 19-2449 Doc: 9 Filed: 05/27/2020 Pg: 2 of 3
3

PER CURIAM: 

Daniel Felix and Christine Hutten appeal from the district court’s December 16, 

2019, order denying reconsideration of its October 7, 2019, order and judgment dismissing 

their civil action. On appeal, Felix and Hutten press challenges to these orders, to the 

court’s interlocutory orders of January 7 and July 29, 2019, and to the magistrate judge’s 

interlocutory order of June 11, 2019. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible 

error. Felix and Hutten waived appellate review of the June 11 order by failing to timely 

object to it, Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a); see Solis v. Malkani, 638 F.3d 269, 274 (4th Cir. 2011), 

and we therefore affirm that order. Felix and Hutten also fail to establish reversible error 

in the remaining orders, and we affirm them for the reasons stated by the district court. 

Felix v. Serv. Ins. Co., No. 2:18-cv-00031-BO (E.D.N.C. Jan. 7, July 29, Oct. 7 & Dec. 16, 

2019). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process. 

AFFIRMED

USCA4 Appeal: 19-2449 Doc: 9 Filed: 05/27/2020 Pg: 3 of 3