Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca8-15-03902/USCOURTS-ca8-15-03902-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Joanna Rae Dungy
Appellant
United States of America
Appellee

Document Text:

United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 15-3902

___________________________

United States of America

lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee

v.

Joanna Rae Dungy

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant

____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the Southern District of Iowa - Des Moines

____________

 Submitted: May 4, 2016

 Filed: May 9, 2016

[Unpublished]

____________

Before WOLLMAN, BOWMAN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges. 

____________

PER CURIAM.

Joanna Rae Dungy directly appeals the district court’s judgment revoking her

1

supervised release and sentencing her to two months in prison and three years of

The Honorable Robert W. Pratt, United States District Judge for the Southern 1

District of Iowa. 

Appellate Case: 15-3902 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/09/2016 Entry ID: 4396523 
supervised release with a special condition that she reside in a residential re-entry

program for up to 120 days following her incarceration. On appeal, Dungy argues

that the court lacked statutory authority to order placement in the residential re-entry

program and that the court abused its discretion in imposing this condition.

After careful review, this court affirms. See 18 U.S.C. § 3583(d) (court may

order special release condition that is reasonably related to 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a)

factors, involves no greater deprivation of liberty than reasonably necessary, and is

consistent with policy statements); United States v. Wiedower, 634 F.3d 490, 493

(8th Cir. 2011) (court has broad discretion when imposing release conditions; when

crafting special condition, court must make individualized inquiry into facts and

circumstances underlying case and make sufficient findings on record so asto ensure

condition satisfies statutory requirements).

The judgment is affirmed, and counsel’s motion to withdraw is granted.

______________________________

-2-

Appellate Case: 15-3902 Page: 2 Date Filed: 05/09/2016 Entry ID: 4396523