Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-10-06375/USCOURTS-ca4-10-06375-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Samuel Paul Crook
Appellant
United States of America
Appellee

Document Text:

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-6375

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

SAMUEL PAUL CROOK,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Martin K. Reidinger, 

District Judge. (3:04-cr-00058-MR-1)

Submitted: July 22, 2010 Decided: August 2, 2010

Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Samuel Paul Crook, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 10-6375 Doc: 6 Filed: 08/02/2010 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Samuel Paul Crook appeals the district court’s order 

denying his motion for appointment of counsel. We have reviewed 

the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm 

for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. 

Crook, No. 3:04-cr-00058-MR-1 (W.D.N.C. Feb. 25, 2010). We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Appeal: 10-6375 Doc: 6 Filed: 08/02/2010 Pg: 2 of 2