Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_16-cv-02648/USCOURTS-caed-2_16-cv-02648-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Jack-In-The-Box, Inc.
Defendant
Maira Munguia
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER AND STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME 

TO RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT

1160629.1

CAROTHERS DiSANTE &

FREUDENBERGER LLP

James C. Ashworth, State Bar No. 151272

jim@theashworthlawoffice.com

THE ASHWORTH LAW OFFICE

1105 Kennedy Place, Suite 8

Davis, CA 95616

Telephone: (530) 574-1130

Facsimile: (530) 564-4987

Attorneys for Plaintiff

MAIRA MANGUIA

Dave Carothers, State Bar No. 125536

dcarothers@cdflaborlaw.com

Nancy N. Lubrano, State Bar No. 263037

nlubrano@cdflaborlaw.com

Joel Van Parys, State Bar No. 227387

jvanparys@cdflaborlaw.com

CAROTHERS DISANTE & FREUDENBERGER LLP

900 University Avenue

Suite 200

Sacramento, California 95825

Telephone: (916) 361-0991

Facsimile: (916) 570-1958

Attorneys for Defendant

JACK-IN-THE-BOX, INC.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MAIRA MUNGUIA,

Plaintiff,

vs.

JACK-IN-THE-BOX, INC.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 2:16-cv-02648-TLN-DB

ORDER AND STIPULATION TO 

EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO THE 

COMPLAINT

Action Filed: November 6, 2016

Case 2:16-cv-02648-TLN-DB Document 6 Filed 12/30/16 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1 ORDER AND STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME 

TO RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT

1160629.1

WHEREAS, on November 6, 2016 Plaintiff Maira Munguia (“Plaintiff”) filed a complaint

against defendant Jack-In-The-Box (“Defendant”) entitled Maira Munguia v. Jack-In-The-Box, 

Case No. 2:16-at-01367 (hereinafter the “Complaint”) (collectively, Plaintiff and Defendant

hereinafter shall be referred to as, the “Parties”);

WHEREAS, on December 9, 2016, Defendant was served with the Complaint via personal 

service;

WHEREAS, Defendant is appearing specially for the sole purpose of taking part in this 

Stipulation and request to the Court to extend the time for Defendant to answer or otherwise 

respond to the Complaint;

WHEREAS, Defendant Jack-In-The-Box contends Plaintiff entered into a Dispute 

Resolution Agreement with Defendant wherein she agreed to arbitrate her alleged claims and 

Defendant will request that Plaintiff stipulate to arbitrate her claims;

WHEREAS, Defendant has not waived its right to enforce arbitration by entering into this 

stipulation; 

WHEREAS, the Parties to the above-captioned action have agreed, in order to discuss 

arbitration, that the responsive deadline shall be extended by 28 days from December 30, 2016. 

Accordingly, Defendant shall have until January 27. 2017, to answer or otherwise respond to the 

Complaint. 

THEREFORE, in accordance with the Parties’ agreement and pursuant to Local Rule 

144(a), Plaintiff and Defendant respectfully request that this Honorable Court grant leave for 

Defendant’s time to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint, including a motion to compel 

arbitration to be extended to January 27, 2017. 

Dated: December 29, 2016 THE ASHWORTH LAW OFFICE

By: /s/ James C. Ashworth (as authorized on 12/29/16)

James C. Ashworth

Attorneys for Plaintiff

MAIRA MUNGUIA

Case 2:16-cv-02648-TLN-DB Document 6 Filed 12/30/16 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

1160629.1

Dated: December 29, 2016 CAROTHERS DISANTE & FREUDENBERGER LLP

Dave Carothers

By: /s/ Joel Van Parys

Joel Van Parys

Attorneys for Defendant

JACK-IN-THE-BOX, INC.

IT IS SO ORDERED

Dated: December 29, 2016

Case 2:16-cv-02648-TLN-DB Document 6 Filed 12/30/16 Page 3 of 3