Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-00335/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-00335-2/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Michael Knowles
Respondent
Richard Robert Melnyk
Petitioner

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

U.S. District Court

 E. D. California cd 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RICHARD ROBERT MELNYK, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

)

v. )

)

)

MICHAEL KNOWLES, Warden, )

)

Respondent. )

 )

1:07-CV-00335 OWW NEW (DLB) HC 

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND 

RECOMMENDATION 

[Doc. #6]

ORDER DISMISSING PETITION FOR WRIT

OF HABEAS CORPUS

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT

TO ENTER JUDGMENT 

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. 

On April 12, 2007, the Magistrate Judge issued a Findings and Recommendation that

recommended the petition for writ of habeas corpus be DISMISSED as duplicative and for failure to

state a claim. This Findings and Recommendation was served on all parties and contained notice that

any objections to the Findings and Recommendation were to be filed within ten (10) court days of

the date of service of the order. Over ten (10) days have passed and no party has filed objections.

The Court notes that the Findings and Recommendation was returned by the U.S. Postal Service as

undeliverable.

Case 1:07-cv-00335-OWW -LJO Document 9 Filed 05/29/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

U.S. District Court

 E. D. California cd 2

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a de

novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds that the Findings

and Recommendation is supported by the record and proper analysis. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendation issued April 12, 2007, is ADOPTED IN FULL; 

2. The petition for writ of habeas corpus is DISMISSED; and

3. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to enter judgment.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 26, 2007 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger 

emm0d6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:07-cv-00335-OWW -LJO Document 9 Filed 05/29/07 Page 2 of 2