Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-00893/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-00893-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Collecto, Inc.
Defendant
EOS CCA
Defendant
Brittany Sandoval
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BRITTANY SANDOVAL,

Plaintiff,

v.

COLLECTO, INC. dba EOS CCA.,

Defendants.

No. 2:14-cv-0893-TLN-CKD

ORDER

The Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman, P.C. (“Plaintiff’s counsel”) represents Plaintiff 

Brittany Sandoval in this matter, and filed a motion to withdraw as counsel on March 6, 2015. 

(ECF No. 10.) This motion “is made on the grounds that [] there has been an irreparable 

breakdown of the attorney-client relationship” and “communication has broken down to the point 

that counsel cannot continue in representing Plaintiff.” (ECF No. 10 at 2, 3.) Plaintiff’s counsel 

has sent written notice to Plaintiff’s physical address and email address, and has advised Defense 

counsel of the intent to withdraw; Defense counsel has not opposed the motion. (ECF No. 10 at 

3, 4.) The motion was submitted without oral argument. 

In consideration of counsel’s stated reason for withdrawal; no opposition by Defense 

counsel and no apparent opposition by Plaintiff; and no apparent prejudice to the administration 

of justice or the timeliness of resolving this case, Plaintiff’s counsel’s motion (ECF No. 10) is 

GRANTED.

Since the motion was filed on March 6, 2015, no other counsel has appeared as attorney of 

Case 2:14-cv-00893-TLN-CKD Document 14 Filed 07/27/15 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

record. Therefore at this time Plaintiff is proceeding pro se. All filings in this matter shall be 

referred to Magistrate Judge Delaney. 

Dated: July 27, 2015

Case 2:14-cv-00893-TLN-CKD Document 14 Filed 07/27/15 Page 2 of 2