Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca5-12-20788/USCOURTS-ca5-12-20788-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Soul Martines Crus
Appellant
United States of America
Appellee

Document Text:

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-20788

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

SOUL MARTINES CRUS, also known as Saul Ruis, also known as Saul Cruz 

Martinez, also known as Saul Omar Martinez,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:12-CR-383-1

Before DAVIS, CLEMENT, and COSTA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Soul Martines Crus has moved for 

leave to withdraw and has filed briefs in accordance with Anders v. California, 

386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). 

Martines Crus has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s briefs and 

the relevant parts of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

January 2, 2015

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 

 Case: 12-20788 Document: 00512887978 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/02/2015
No. 12-20788

assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. 

Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw pursuant to Anders is 

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the 

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. Counsel’s motion to withdraw 

based on the closing of her law practice is DENIED as unnecessary.

2

 Case: 12-20788 Document: 00512887978 Page: 2 Date Filed: 01/02/2015