Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-00768/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-00768-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Ari Mansonhing
Defendant
Shari's Berries International, Inc.
Plaintiff

Document Text:

STIPULATION - 1 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Paul Nathan Phillips (California Bar #128197) 

Law Office of Paul Nathan Phillips 

8950 Cal Center Drive, suite 160 

Sacramento, Ca 95826 

Telephone: 916-362-3206 

Fax: 916-362-2849 

Attorney for Plaintiff 

SHARI’S BERRIES INTERNATIONAL, INC. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SHARI’S BERRIES INTERNATIONAL, INC. 

 Plaintiff, 

v. 

 

ARI MANSONHING, an individual dba LA 

BERRIES. and DOES 1-30 

 Defendants 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Case No.: 2:06-CV-00768-GEB-GGH 

STIPULATION FOR CHANGE OF COURT 

DATES 

(Local Rules 78-230(g); 83-143; 6-144) 

COMES NOW Plaintiff Shari's Berries International, Inc. (hereinafter "Shari's" or 

"Plaintiff") and Defendant ARI MANSONHING, an individual dba LA BERRIES (hereinafter 

"Mansonhing" or "Plaintiff") and through their respective counsel stipulate pursuant to Local 

Rules 78-230(g), 83-143 and 6-144 as follows: 

1. Defendant has filed a Motion Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(3) and 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a) to 

Dismiss or Transfer for Improper Venue, or, Alternatively for Convenience Transfer Pursuant to 

28 U.S.C. § 1404(a). The Hearing on the Motion is currently calendared for July 10, 2006 at 9 

am. 

2. The Status Conference is currently calendared for July 17, 2006 at 9 am. 

3. Plaintiff's counsel has a previously scheduled conflict in another case in another court 

for the morning of July 10, 2006. Plaintiff's counsel is a sole practitioner and does not have the 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 2:06-cv-00768-GEB-GGH Document 8 Filed 06/26/06 Page 1 of 2
STIPULATION - 2 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ability to cover both matters. Plaintiff's and Defendant's counsel have met and conferred by 

telephone, and Defendant's counsel does not object to a continuance of the hearing on the 

Motion. 

4. The parties are currently engaged in discussions regarding this case, which if fruitful, 

may eliminate the need for the Motion. Moreover, in the interests of justice and comity to the 

calendar of the Court and the attorneys, the Status Conference would be better heard following 

the Motion to Dismiss or Transfer, if the parties are not able to informally resolve the issues. 

Accordingly, counsel for the parties have agreed to a continuance of the Status Conference 

until after requested date for the hearing on the Motion. 

5. The parties respectfully request that the Hearing on the Motion be re-calendared for 

August 7, 2006 at 9 am and the Status Conference be re-calendared for August 28, 2006 at 9 

am. This is the parties’ first request to continue the Motion and Conference. Local Rule 6-

144(b). 

Respectfully agreed to this 21th day of June 2006, 

DEFENDANT ARI MANSONHING, 

an individual dba LA BERRIES 

By /s/ Gregory J. Hall (as authorized on 6/20/2006) 

___________________________

PLAINTIFF SHARI’S BERRIES 

INTERNATIONAL, INC. 

By /s/ Paul Nathan Phillips 

Gregory J. Hall, Esq. (211321) 

Ritz Rubin Zagzebski Hall LLP 

1901 Avenue of the Stars, 2d Floor 

Los Angeles Ca 90067 

Telephone: 310-461-1325 

Fax: 310-499-5691 

Paul Nathan Phillips, Esq. (128197) 

8950 Cal Center Drive, suite 160 

Sacramento, Ca 95826 

Telephone: 916-362-3206 

Fax: 916-362-2849 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: June 26, 2006 

 /s/ Garland E. Burrell, Jr. 

 GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.

 United States District Judge 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 2:06-cv-00768-GEB-GGH Document 8 Filed 06/26/06 Page 2 of 2