Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-01255/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-01255-6/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Indura Systems, Inc.
Plaintiff
Isaac Seoane
Defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-1- STIPULATED INJUNCTION

Case No. 3:14-CV-01255-MMC

PERKINS COIE LLP

BRIAN P. HENNESSY (No. 226721)

bhennessy@perkinscoie.com

J. PATRICK CORRIGAN (No. 240859)

pcorrigan@perkinscoie.com 

BROCK S. WEBER (No. 261383)

bweber@perkinscoie.com

3150 Porter Drive

Palo Alto, CA 94304-1212

Telephone: 650.838.4300

Facsimile: 650.838.4350

Attorneys for Plaintiff

INDURA SYSTEMS, INC.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

INDURA SYSTEMS, INC.,

Plaintiff,

v.

Isaac SEOANE,

Defendant.

Case No. 3:14-CV-01255-MMC

STIPULATED INJUNCTION

Plaintiff Indura Systems, Inc. (“Indura”) and Defendant Isaac Seoane (“Seoane”) stipulate 

to permanent injunctive relief in favor of Indura as set forth below. This Stipulated Injunction 

arises out of a settlement agreement entered into by the parties (the “Settlement Agreement”). 

The terms of the Settlement Agreement are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety. 

This Stipulated Injunction does not alter or supersede the obligations of any parties to that 

Settlement Agreement.

Indura and Seoane hereby stipulates as follows:

1. Seoane consents to this Court’s jurisdiction over the subject matter at issue in this 

action.

2. Seoane consents to this Court’s personal jurisdiction over him for the purposes of 

entry and enforcement of this Stipulated Injunction and enforcement of the Settlement 

Agreement.

Case3:14-cv-01255-MMC Document41 Filed03/25/15 Page1 of 4

AND JUDGMENT BY STIPULATION

Case 3:14-cv-01255-MMC Document 42 Filed 03/31/15 Page 1 of 3
Case 3:14-cv-01255-MMC Document 42 Filed 03/31/15 Page 2 of 3 Case3:14-cv-01255-MMC Document41 Filed03/25/15 Page2 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-3- STIPULATED INJUNCTION

Case No. 3:14-CV-01255-MMC

JUDGMENT BY STIPULATION

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: March __, 2015

HONORABLE MAXINE M. CHESNEY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case3:14-cv-01255-MMC Document41 Filed03/25/15 Page3 of 4

31

Case 3:14-cv-01255-MMC Document 42 Filed 03/31/15 Page 3 of 3