Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca3-06-01904/USCOURTS-ca3-06-01904-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Terrance Larnell Cole
Appellant
United States of America
Appellee

Document Text:

Honorable Norma L. Shapiro, Senior Judge of the United States District Court for the *

Eastern District of Pennsylvania, sitting by designation.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

 

No. 06-1904

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v.

TERRANCE LARNELL COLE,

 Appellant

 

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Pennsylvania

(D.C. Criminal Action No. 04-cr-109)

District Judge: Honorable Thomas M. Hardiman

 

Submitted Under Third Circuit LAR 34.1(a)

July 10, 2007

Before: RENDELL and AMBRO, Circuit Judges,

and SHAPIRO, District Judge *

 

ORDER AMENDING OPINION

 

Case: 06-1904 Document: 003110051165 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/09/2010
It is hereby ORDERED that the Not Precedential Opinion filed in the within matter on

August 31, 2007 is AMENDED as follows:

On page 6, delete the following sentence:

There is the government’s memorandum in support of its motion

(App. 326-332) and the statements the District Court made in open

court concerning the matter (Supp. App. 978).

and replace it with the following language:

There is the government’s memorandum in support of its motion

(App. 326-332) and the statements the District Court made

concerning the matter.

On page 8, delete the following sentences:

The District Court announced in open court in his presence the

plan to impanel the jury anonymously before voir dire began. With

notice, Cole failed to object.

and replace it with the following language:

The anonymous jury was selected in Cole’s presence, and the

judge’s discussion of the voir dire made clear the jurors were to

answer only by number (Tr. 8/15/05, p. 8); Cole must have realized

what was going on and could have objected then or later as he was

present for the discussion of an anonymous jury when Juror 197

was excused but Juror 16 was not (Tr. 8/17/05, p. 6).

For the convenience of the parties, a final copy of the amended opinion is attached to this order. 

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Marjorie O. Rendell

Dated: March 9, 2010

Case: 06-1904 Document: 003110051165 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/09/2010