Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-14-02123/USCOURTS-ca4-14-02123-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Starsha Sewell
Appellant
Strayer University
Appellee

Document Text:

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-2123

STARSHA SEWELL,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

STRAYER UNIVERSITY,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, Senior District 

Judge. (8:12-cv-02927-DKC)

Submitted: February 24, 2015 Decided: March 11, 2015

Before DUNCAN, DIAZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Starsha Sewell, Appellant Pro Se. Denise E. Giraudo, Joleen 

Okun, OGLETREE DEAKINS NASH SMOAK & STEWART, PC, Washington, 

D.C., for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 14-2123 Doc: 11 Filed: 03/11/2015 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Starsha Sewell appeals the district court’s order denying 

her Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion and her motions for 

reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no 

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated 

by the district court. Sewell v. Strayer Univ., No. 

8:12-cv-02927-DKC (D. Md. Apr. 18, Sept. 18, Sept. 26, Oct. 3, 

2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

AFFIRMED

Appeal: 14-2123 Doc: 11 Filed: 03/11/2015 Pg: 2 of 2