Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_05-cv-00702/USCOURTS-cand-4_05-cv-00702-4/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Commercial Recovery Systems, Inc.
Defendant
Rose Smith
Defendant
Joanne Wan
Plaintiff

Document Text:

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOANNE WAN, an individual on behalf of

herself and all others similarly situated,

Plaintiff,

 v.

COMMERCIAL RECOVERY SYSTEMS, INC.,

ROSE SMITH, an individual, 

Defendants. _______________________________________

No. C 05-702 SBA

 

ORDER

[Docket Nos. 20, 33]

This matter comes before the Court on the Motion for Attorneys' Fees and Costs ("Motion")

brought by Defendants Commercial Recovery Systems, Inc. and Rose Smith ("Defendants"). 

On June 21, 2005, this Court referred Defendants' Motion to Magistrate Judge Zimmerman for

a report and recommendation. On August 25, 2005, Magistrate Judge Zimmerman issued his Report

and Recommendation re Defendants' Motion [Docket No. 33]. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil

Procedure 72(a), "[w]ithin 10 days after being served with a copy of the magistrate judge's order, a party

may serve and file objections to the order; a party may not thereafter assign as error a defect in the

magistrate judge's order to which objection was not timely made." Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a). The ten-day

period for filing any objections has elapsed and none of the parties have filed any objections to the

report. 

Having considered the report, and the recommendations therein, and for good cause appearing,

this Court hereby ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Zimmerman's Report and Recommendation re Defendants'

Motion for Attorneys' Fees and Costs.

Accordingly, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT Magistrate Judge Zimmerman's Report and Recommendation

Case 4:05-cv-00702-SBA Document 34 Filed 01/17/06 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

re Defendants' Motion for Attorneys' Fees and Costs [Docket No. 33] is ADOPTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT Defendants' Motion for Attorneys' Fees and Costs [Docket

No. 20] is DENIED. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

 Dated: 1/17/06 SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG

United States District Judge

Case 4:05-cv-00702-SBA Document 34 Filed 01/17/06 Page 2 of 2