Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-arwd-5_06-cv-05043/USCOURTS-arwd-5_06-cv-05043-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Floyd Earl Coop
Plaintiff
Cure
Defendant
Tim Helder
Defendant

Document Text:

AO72A

(Rev. 8/82)

-1-

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS

FAYETTEVILLE DIVISION

FLOYD EARL COOP PLAINTIFF

v. Civil No. 06-5043

 

SHERIFF TIM HELDER;

and MISS CURE DEFENDANTS

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Frank Earl Coop filed this pro se civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on March

13, 2006. His complaint was filed in forma pauperis (IFP). 

On March 28, 2006, the undersigned entered an order (Doc. 7) directing Coop to complete,

sign and return an attached addendum to his complaint. The addendum was to be returned by April

28, 2006. 

To date, the plaintiff has failed to respond to the addendum. The court’s order and attached

addendum have not been returned as undeliverable. The order was mailed to the same address as the

court’s prior orders. Plaintiff has not informed the court of any change in his address. Plaintiff has

not otherwise communicated with the court.

I therefore recommend Coop’s claims be dismissed on the grounds he has failed to prosecute

this action and comply with the order of the court. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). Coop has ten days

from receipt of the report and recommendation in which to file written objections pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). The failure to file timely objections may result in waiver of the right to

appeal questions of fact. Coop is reminded that objections must be both timely and specific to

trigger de novo review by the district court.

DATED this 8th day of May 2006.

/s/ Beverly Stites Jones 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 5:06-cv-05043-JLH Document 8 Filed 05/08/06 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: <pageID>