Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-15-06274/USCOURTS-ca4-15-06274-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Julius Nesbitt
Appellant
United States of America
Appellee

Document Text:

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-6274

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

JULIUS NESBITT, a/k/a Butch,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Charleston. David C. Norton, District Judge. 

(2:08-cr-01153-DCN-1)

Submitted: June 23, 2015 Decided: July 1, 2015

Before DUNCAN and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Julius Nesbitt, Appellant Pro Se. Emmanuel Joseph Ferguson, 

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charleston, South 

Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 15-6274 Doc: 7 Filed: 07/01/2015 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Julius Nesbitt appeals the district court’s order denying 

his motion to correct the court’s amended criminal judgment. We 

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. To the 

extent the district court’s oral pronouncements at sentencing 

created any ambiguity, we find that its written judgment 

unambiguously clarified its intent. See United States v. 

Osborne, 345 F.3d 281, 283 n.1 (4th Cir. 2003) (holding that 

when the sentencing transcript is ambiguous, we look to written 

criminal judgment to resolve ambiguity). Accordingly, we affirm

the district court’s order. We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented 

in the materials before this court and argument would not aid 

the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Appeal: 15-6274 Doc: 7 Filed: 07/01/2015 Pg: 2 of 2