Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-01208/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-01208-3/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
General Teamsters Union Local No. 439
Petitioner
Sunrise Sanitation Services, Inc.
Respondent

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-1- 

STIPULATION AND ORDER RE: EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS 

SEYFARTH SHAW LLP 

Mark S. Ross (SBN 064812) 

Brian T. Ashe (SBN 139999) 

560 Mission Street, 31st Flr. 

San Francisco, California 94105 

Telephone: (415) 397-2823 

Facsimile: (415) 397-8549 

SEYFARTH SHAW LLP 

Mark P. Grajski (SBN 178050) 

400 Capitol Mall, Suite 2350 

Sacramento, California 95814-4428 

Telephone: (916) 448-0159 

Facsimile: (916) 558-4839 

Attorneys for Respondent 

SUNRISE SANITATION SERVICES, INC. 

David A. Rosenfeld (SBN 058163) 

Caren P. Sencer (SBN 233488) 

WEINBERG, ROGER & ROSENFELD 

1001 Marina Village Parkway 

Alameda, CA 94501 

Telephone: (510) 337-1001 

Facsimile: (510) 337-1023 

Attorneys for Petitioner 

GENERAL TEAMSTERS LOCAL 439 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

GENERAL TEAMSTERS UNION LOCAL 

NO. 439, 

Petitioner, 

v. 

SUNRISE SANITATION SERVICES, INC., 

Respondent. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Case No. 2:05-CV-01208-WBS-JFM 

STIPULATION AND ORDER RE: 

EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS 

Date: April 17, 2006 

Time: 1:30 p.m. 

Courtroom: 5 

Judge: Hon. William B. Shubb 

Respondent Sunrise Sanitation Services, Inc.. (“Sunrise”) and Petitioner General 

Teamsters Union Local No. 439 (“Local 439”), by and through their respective counsel, make 

the following stipulations regarding Sunrise’s objections to the evidence offered by Local 439 in 

support of Local 439’s motion to compel arbitration: 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 2:05-cv-01208-WBS -JFM Document 35 Filed 03/29/06 Page 1 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-2- 

STIPULATION AND ORDER RE: EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS 

STIPULATIONS 

A. Objections To The Declaration of Pablo Barrera 

1. Withdrawn. 

2. Withdrawn. 

3. Withdrawn, with the understanding that Sunrise does not concede that the October 

28, 2004 election comported with due process. 

4. Local 439 may submit an amended declaration to attempt to overcome the 

asserted objections. 

5. Local 439 may submit an amended declaration to attempt to overcome the 

asserted objections. 

6. Withdrawn. 

7. Withdrawn. 

8. The statement, “With non-Union employers, I have never encountered a company 

that requires termination for involvement in a second minor accident” will be stricken from the 

declaration and will not be included in any amended declaration. 

9. The phrase, “as required under the terms of the collective bargaining agreement” 

will be stricken from the declaration and will not be included in any amended declaration. 

B. Objections To The Declaration Of Humberto Palacio 

1. Withdrawn. 

2. Withdrawn. 

3. Withdrawn, with the understanding that Sunrise does not concede that the October 

28, 2004 election comported with due process. 

4. Local 439 may submit an amended declaration to attempt to overcome the 

asserted objections. 

5. Withdrawn. 

6. Withdrawn. 

7. Withdrawn. 

8. Withdrawn. 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 2:05-cv-01208-WBS -JFM Document 35 Filed 03/29/06 Page 2 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-3- 

STIPULATION AND ORDER RE: EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS 

9. Local 439 may submit an amended declaration to attempt to overcome the 

asserted objections. 

10. The phrase, “as required under the terms of the collective bargaining agreement” 

will be stricken from the declaration and will not be included in any amended declaration. 

C. Objections To The Declaration Of Edward Speckman 

1. Withdrawn, with the understanding that Sunrise does not concede that the October 

28, 2004 election comported with due process. 

2. Withdrawn. 

3. Local 439 may submit an amended declaration to attempt to overcome the 

asserted objections. 

4. Local 439 may submit an amended declaration to attempt to overcome the 

asserted objections. 

5. Withdrawn. 

6. Withdrawn. 

7. The statement, “With non-Union employers, I have never encountered a company 

that requires termination for involvement in a second minor accident” will be stricken from the 

declaration and will not be included in any amended declaration. 

8. The phrase, “as required under the terms of the collective bargaining agreement” 

will be stricken from the declaration and will not be included in any amended declaration. 

DATED: March 27, 2006 SEYFARTH SHAW LLP 

By:_/s/ Mark P. Grajski________________

Mark P. Grajski 

Attorneys for Defendant 

SUNRISE SANITATION SERVICES, INC.

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 2:05-cv-01208-WBS -JFM Document 35 Filed 03/29/06 Page 3 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-4- 

STIPULATION AND ORDER RE: EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS 

DATED: March 27, 2006 WEINBERG, ROGER & ROSENFELD 

By: _/s/ Caren P. Sencer________________

Caren P. Sencer 

Attorneys for Petitioner 

GENERAL TEAMSTERS LOCAL 439 

ORDER 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: March 28, 2006 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 2:05-cv-01208-WBS -JFM Document 35 Filed 03/29/06 Page 4 of 4