Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_09-cv-00242/USCOURTS-caed-2_09-cv-00242-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
D. K. Sisto
Respondent
Alfonso Vasquez
Petitioner

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ALFONSO VASQUEZ,

Petitioner, No. 2:09-cv-0242 WBS KJN P

vs.

D. K. SISTO, 

Respondent. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

A recent court order was served on petitioner’s address of record and returned by

the postal service. It appears that petitioner has failed to comply with Local Rule 182(f), which

requires that a party appearing without counsel inform the court of any address change.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed for

petitioner's failure to keep the court apprised of his current address. See Local Rules 182(f) and

110 (E.D. Cal. 1997).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twentyone days after being served with these findings and recommendations, petitioner may file written

objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s

Findings and Recommendations.” Petitioner is advised that failure to file objections within the

Case 2:09-cv-00242-WBS-KJN Document 17 Filed 05/21/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951

F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: May 20, 2010

_____________________________________

KENDALL J. NEWMAN

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

vasq0242.133a

Case 2:09-cv-00242-WBS-KJN Document 17 Filed 05/21/10 Page 2 of 2