Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-16-06254/USCOURTS-ca4-16-06254-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
United States of America
Appellee
Dion Levering Williams
Appellant

Document Text:

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-6254

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

DION LEVERING WILLIAMS, a/k/a Tion Williams, a/k/a Scroll, 

a/k/a Squirrel,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, District 

Judge. (3:12-cr-00047-HEH-RCY-4)

Submitted: August 25, 2016 Decided: August 29, 2016

Before NIEMEYER, DIAZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Dion Levering Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Peter Sinclair 

Duffey, Michael Ronald Gill, Assistant United States Attorneys, 

Richmond, Virginia; Jamie L. Mickelson, Assistant United States 

Attorney, Atlanta, Georgia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 16-6254 Doc: 12 Filed: 08/29/2016 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Dion Levering Williams appeals the district court’s order 

denying his motion to reconsider the court’s order granting his 

18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion to reduce his sentence. 

Because the district court lacked jurisdiction to consider 

Williams’ motion for reconsideration, we affirm the denial of 

relief. See United States v. Goodwyn, 596 F.3d 233, 235-36 (4th 

Cir. 2010) (holding that district court lacks authority to grant 

motion to reconsider ruling on § 3582(c)(2) motion). We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Appeal: 16-6254 Doc: 12 Filed: 08/29/2016 Pg: 2 of 2