Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_10-cv-00871/USCOURTS-caed-2_10-cv-00871-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Richard B. Ives
Respondent
Ernesto Ramos
Petitioner

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

 A court may take judicial notice of court records. See MGIC Indem. Co. v. Weisman, 1

803 F.2d 500, 505 (9th Cir. 1986); United States v. Wilson, 631 F.2d 118, 119 (9th Cir. 1980).

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ERNESTO RAMOS,

Petitioner, No. CIV S-10-0871 DAD P

vs.

RICHARD B. IVES, 

Respondent. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

Petitioner is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas

corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. Petitioner filed his petition on April 13, 2010. The court's

own records reveal that on April 12, 2010, petitioner filed a petition containing virtually identical

allegations against the same respondent. (No. CIV S-10-0848 KJN P). Due to the duplicative 1

nature of the present action, the court will recommend that the petition be dismissed.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is directed to

randomly assign a United States District Judge to this action.

IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without

prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

Case 2:10-cv-00871-DAD Document 4 Filed 04/22/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twentyone days after being served with these findings and recommendations, petitioner may file written

objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge's

Findings and Recommendations.” Petitioner is advised that failure to file objections within the

specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951

F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: April 21, 2010.

DAD:9

ramo0871.123

Case 2:10-cv-00871-DAD Document 4 Filed 04/22/10 Page 2 of 2