Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cr-00167/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cr-00167-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Celia Atkinson
Defendant
USA
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1 MOTION & [PROPOSED] ORDER 

CONTINUING STATUS CONFERENCE

Case No.: CR14-000167 CRB

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

David W. Shapiro (CA Bar No. 219265) 

dshapiro@boerschshapiro.com

BOERSCH SHAPIRO LLP

1611 Telegraph Ave., Suite 806

Oakland, CA 94612

Telephone: (415) 500-6644

Attorney for Defendant

CELIA ATKINSON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

CELIA ATKINSON,

Defendant.

Case No. CR14-000167 CRB

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

CONTINUING STATUS CONFERENCE

Defendant CELIA ATKINSON, by her counsel David W. Shapiro, and the United States 

Attorney, by its counsel Special Assistant U.S. Attorney Katherine Lloyd-Lovett, hereby stipulate 

and agree that a status conference be set for December 23, 2015, at 2:00 p.m., or as soon thereafter as 

may be convenient to the Court.

The grounds for this stipulation are as follows:

1. This case is currently scheduled for a status conference on December 16, 2015.

2. The defense and the government have discussed a disposition of diversion for Ms. 

Atkinson. The Pretrial Services office is currently conducting an investigation to determine its 

position regarding diversion. The officer estimates that the investigation will be completed in about 

the next week. 

3. The parties have agreed that a continuance to December 23, 2015 is reasonable, and 

the Court is available on that date.

Case 3:14-cr-00167-CRB Document 52 Filed 12/10/15 Page 1 of 3
2 MOTION & [PROPOSED] ORDER 

CONTINUING STATUS CONFERENCE

Case No.: CR14-000167 CRB

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

4. The parties request that the Court exclude time between December 16, 2015 and 

December 23, 2015 from the calculation of time under the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C.§ 3161, to 

allow for the effective preparation of counsel for possible diversion. The parties agree that the ends 

of justice in granting the continuance and excluding time outweigh the best interest of the public and 

the defendant in a speedy trial. 

5. Special AUSA Katherine Lloyd-Lovett has consented to the continuance and to the 

exclusion of time under the Speedy Trial Act, and to the inclusion of her signature on this stipulation.

Dated: December 9, 2015 /s/ David W. Shapiro 

DAVID W. SHAPIRO

Attorney for Defendant Celia Atkinson

/s/ Katherine Lloyd-Lovett _______

KATHERINE LLOYD-LOVETT 

Special Assistant U.S. Attorney

Case 3:14-cr-00167-CRB Document 52 Filed 12/10/15 Page 2 of 3
ORDER CONTINUING STATUS 

CONFERENCE

Case No.: CR14-000167 CRB

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

CELIA ATKINSON,

Defendant.

Case No. CR14-000167 CRB

[PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING 

STATUS CONFERENCE 

Based on the stipulation between the parties in this case, IT IS ORDERED that a status 

conference in this case is set for December 23, 2015 at 2:00 p.m. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the time period between December 16, 2015 and December

23, 2015 is excluded in computing the time within which the trial must commence, pursuant to 18 

U.S.C. §§ 3161(h)(7)(A) and (h)(7)(B)(i) and (iv).

IT IS SO ORDERED:

Dated: December ___, 2015 ___________________________________

HONORABLE CHARLES R. BREYER

United States Senior District Judge

10

Case 3:14-cr-00167-CRB Document 52 Filed 12/10/15 Page 3 of 3