Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-00923/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-00923-4/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Darrel Adams
Respondent
Victor Rodriguez
Petitioner

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

VICTOR RODRIGUEZ, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

v. )

)

DARREL ADAMS, Warden, )

)

Respondent. )

 )

1:07-cv-00923-LJO-SMS-HC

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATION (Doc. 12)

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

DISMISS (Doc. 7)

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO ENTER

JUDGMENT FOR RESPONDENT

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a

Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. 

On January 15, 2008, the Magistrate Judge filed Findings and a

Recommendation that Respondent's Motion to Dismiss the instant

Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus for failure to state a

cognizable claim and as time-barred under 2244(d)(1) be GRANTED,

and the Clerk of Court be directed to enter judgment in favor of

Respondent. These Findings and Recommendation were served on all

parties and contained notice that any objections were to be filed

within thirty (30) days from the date of service of that order. To

date, the parties have not filed objections to the Findings and

Recommendation.

Case 1:07-cv-00923-LJO -SMS Document 13 Filed 03/07/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636

(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a de novo review of the case. 

Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court concludes that

the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation are supported by

the record and proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendation, filed January 15, 2008,

are ADOPTED IN FULL;

2. Respondent's motion to dismiss the instant petition for

writ of habeas corpus for failure to state a cognizable claim and

as time-barred under § 2244(d)(1), filed August 30, 2007, is

GRANTED; and,

3. The Clerk of Court enter judgment in favor of Respondent.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 6, 2008 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill 

66h44d UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:07-cv-00923-LJO -SMS Document 13 Filed 03/07/08 Page 2 of 2