Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_15-cv-01191/USCOURTS-caed-1_15-cv-01191-4/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Adolfo Jimenez
Defendant
John Pierro
Defendant
Jimmy Jacob Renteria
Plaintiff
Guy Turner
Defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JIMMY JACOB RENTERIA,

Plaintiff,

v.

ADOLFO JIMENEZ, JOHN PIERRO, GUY 

TURNER, and DOES 1-10,

Defendants.

Case No. 1:15-cv-01191- SMS

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND 

RECOMMENDATIONS 

(Doc. 9) 

Plaintiff Jimmy Renteria, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis filed a 

complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging violations of his rights under the United States 

Constitution. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge under 28 U.S.C. § 

636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302 of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of 

California. 

On January 12, 2016, the Magistrate Judge issued Findings and Recommendations (F&R) 

that (1) Plaintiff proceed on the excessive force and deprivation of liberty claims against 

Defendants, and (2) that all other claims be dismissed with prejudice. Doc. 9. Plaintiff has since 

filed a notice indicating that he does not object to the F&R and requests an order permitting service 

of his surviving claims. Doc. 11. 

Case 1:15-cv-01191-LJO-SKO Document 12 Filed 03/02/16 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), the Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. 

Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the Findings and Recommendations to be 

supported by the record and by proper analysis. 

Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that: 

1. The Findings and Recommendations filed on January 13, 2016, is adopted in full; 

2. Plaintiff is to proceed on the excessive force and deprivation of liberty claims against 

Defendants; and

3. All other claims asserted in the Complaint are dismissed with prejudice. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 2, 2016 /s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:15-cv-01191-LJO-SKO Document 12 Filed 03/02/16 Page 2 of 2