Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-19-01981/USCOURTS-ca4-19-01981-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Damon Emanuel Elliott
Petitioner

Document Text:

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-1981

In re: DAMON EMANUEL ELLIOTT,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (8:18-cv-03027-PJM)

Submitted: January 23, 2020 Decided: January 27, 2020

Before WYNN, DIAZ, and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Damon Emanuel Elliott, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 19-1981 Doc: 12 Filed: 01/27/2020 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Damon Emanuel Elliott petitions for a writ of mandamus seeking an order from this 

court directing the district court to act on his civil action, which he filed in the district court 

in October 2018. Mandamus relief is a drastic remedy and should be used only in 

extraordinary circumstances. Kerr v. U.S. Dist. Court, 426 U.S. 394, 402 (1976); United 

States v. Moussaoui, 333 F.3d 509, 516-17 (4th Cir. 2003). Further, mandamus relief is 

available only when the petitioner has a clear right to the relief sought. In re First Fed. 

Sav. & Loan Ass’n, 860 F.2d 135, 138 (4th Cir. 1988). 

The district court’s docket establishes that Elliott’s civil action is proceeding and 

reveals no undue delay in the district court. Accordingly, we deny the mandamus petition. 

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

PETITION DENIED

USCA4 Appeal: 19-1981 Doc: 12 Filed: 01/27/2020 Pg: 2 of 2