Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca5-19-60300/USCOURTS-ca5-19-60300-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Joe Flynn
Appellant
United States of America
Appellee

Document Text:

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-60300

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JOE FLYNN,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 3:14-CR-39-1

Before STEWART, HIGGINSON, and COSTA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Joe Flynn appeals the sentence imposed following the revocation of his 

supervised release. We must examine the basis of our jurisdiction, sua sponte,

if necessary. Mosley v. Cozby, 813 F.2d 659, 660 (5th Cir. 1987). During the 

pendency of this appeal, Flynn completed his revocation sentence and was 

released from custody. Because the district court did not impose an additional 

term of supervised release, there is no case or controversy for us to address.

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

January 21, 2020

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 19-60300 Document: 00515278797 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/21/2020
No. 19-60300

2

See Spencer v. Kemna, 523 U.S. 1, 7 (1998); cf. United States v. Lares-Meraz, 

452 F.3d 352, 355 (5th Cir. 2006). Accordingly, Flynn’s appeal is DISMISSED 

as moot.

Case: 19-60300 Document: 00515278797 Page: 2 Date Filed: 01/21/2020