Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-01843/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-01843-2/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Walker
Respondent
Jason David Yonai
Petitioner

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JASON DAVID YONAI, 

Petitioner, No. CIV S-07-1843 GEB GGH P

vs.

WALKER, et al.,

Respondents. ORDER

 /

Respondent filed a motion to dismiss the instant petition as barred by the AEDPA

statute of limitations, on January 16, 2008. On February 22, 2008, petitioner filed a motion

entitled “motion for extension of time and motion of [sic] opposition to respondent’s motion to

dismiss, and motion to stay and amend petition.” The court’s review of that request indicates

that petitioner has made an effort to include some substantive argument opposing the motion. On

February 25, 2008, petitioner filed a motion to withdraw his request for an extension of time and

his motion to stay and amend the petition. Petitioner attaches thereto a copy of writ denial by the

state supreme court dated February 13, 2008, stating that the writ denial shows both exhaustion

of his state court remedies and that he has met the one-year time limitations. 

\\\\\

\\\\\

Case 2:07-cv-01843-GEB-GGH Document 12 Filed 03/25/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

The court will grant petitioner’s motion to withdraw his February 22, 2008

requests with the exception that the undersigned will permit petitioner an extension of time to file

any supplemental opposition to respondent’s pending motion. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Petitioner's February 25, 2008(#11) motion to withdraw his February 22, 2008

(#10) motion for stay, extension of time, and to amend is granted with the exception that the

court grants petitioner an additional twenty (20) days to file any supplemental opposition to the

pending motion to dismiss;

2. There will be no further extensions of time; and

3. Upon filing of any timely supplemental opposition, pursuant to this order, or

expiration of time therefore, respondent will have seven days to file any reply, after which this

matter will be deemed submitted

DATED: 03/25/08

/s/ Gregory G. Hollows

GREGORY G. HOLLOWS

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

GGH:009/bb

yoni1843.111

 

Case 2:07-cv-01843-GEB-GGH Document 12 Filed 03/25/08 Page 2 of 2