Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-00368/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-00368-2/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
People of the State of California
Respondent
Angelo Searcy
Petitioner

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ANGELO SEARCY, 

Petitioner, No. CIV S-07-368 GEB KJM P

vs.

PEOPLE OF THE STATE

OF CALIFORNIA,

Respondent. ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

 /

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with an application for writ of

habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On August 3, 2007, respondent filed a motion to

dismiss. Petitioner has not filed an opposition to the motion. Local Rule 78-230(m) provides in

part: “Failure of the responding party to file written opposition or to file a statement of no

opposition may be deemed a waiver of any opposition to the granting of the motion . . . .” In

addition, Local Rule 11-110 provides that failure to comply with the Local Rules “may be

grounds for imposition of any and all sanctions authorized by statute or Rule or within the

inherent power of the Court.” 

/////

/////

Case 2:07-cv-00368-GEB -KJM Document 9 Filed 10/15/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner show cause,

within twenty days, why respondent’s motion to dismiss should not be granted. Failure to

comply with this order will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed pursuant

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).

DATED: October 12, 2007. 

2

sear0368.46

Case 2:07-cv-00368-GEB -KJM Document 9 Filed 10/15/07 Page 2 of 2