Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_16-cv-01459/USCOURTS-caed-2_16-cv-01459-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Defendant
Gordon McMahon
Plaintiff
Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc.
Defendant

Document Text:

1 

ORDER TO STAY CASE AND CONTINUE MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

McMahon v. JPMorgan Chase Bank,, N.A., et al., Court Case No. 2:16-CV-01459-JAM-KJN 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WRIGHT, FINLAY & ZAK, LLP 

Gwen H. Ribar, Esq., SBN 188024 

Marvin B. Adviento, Esq., SBN 240315 

4665 MacArthur Court, Suite 200 

Newport Beach, CA 92660

Tel: (949) 477-5050; Fax: (949) 608-9142 

Attorneys for Defendant, Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

GORDON MCMAHON, an individual, 

 Plaintiff, 

 vs. 

JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.; 

SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING, 

INC.; and DOES 1-20, inclusive, 

 Defendants, 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

CASE NO: 2:16-CV-01459-JAMKJN

ORDER ON JOINT 

STIPULATION TO STAY CASE 

AND TO CONTINUE THE 

HEARING ON PLAINTIFF’S 

MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY 

INJUNCTION 

HEARING 

Date: July 12, 2016 

Time: 1:30PM 

Courtroom: 6, 14th Floor 

THIS COURT, having read and considered the Stipulation to Stay Case 

and Continue Preliminary Injunction, and with good cause appearing thereby, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 

1. This case is stayed pending the outcome of the current loan 

modification review; 

2. The Motion for Preliminary Injunction shall be continued to August 

23, 2016 at 1:30 PM before Judge Mendez. 

Case 2:16-cv-01459-JAM-KJN Document 10 Filed 07/11/16 Page 1 of 2
2 

ORDER TO STAY CASE AND CONTINUE MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

McMahon v. JPMorgan Chase Bank,, N.A., et al., Court Case No. 2:16-CV-01459-JAM-KJN 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3. Any Opposition and Reply to the Order to Show Cause re 

Preliminary Injunction shall be continued in accordance with the new date, 

pursuant to Local Rules; and 

4. The Temporary Restraining Order shall remain in place up to and 

including the date of the new hearing on the Motion for Preliminary Injunction as 

set by the Court. 

IT IS SO ORDERED: 

Dated: July 11, 2016 By: /s/ John A. Mendez 

 

HONORABLE JUDGE JOHN A. MENDEZ

Case 2:16-cv-01459-JAM-KJN Document 10 Filed 07/11/16 Page 2 of 2