Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-24-06744/USCOURTS-ca4-24-06744-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Michael Frasier
Appellant
Steven Hall
Appellee
North Charleston Police Department
Appellee
Daniel Pritchard
Appellee

Document Text:

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 24-6744

MICHAEL FRASIER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

SERGEANT DANIEL PRITCHARD, North Charleston Police Department; 

STEVEN HALL, North Charleston Police Department; NORTH CHARLESTON 

POLICE DEPARTMENT, S.C.,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at 

Charleston. Donald C. Coggins, Jr., District Judge. (2:23-cv-04163-DCC)

Submitted: December 19, 2024 Decided: December 27, 2024

Before KING and BERNER, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael Frasier, Appellant Pro Se. Gordon Wade Cooper, BUYCK LAW FIRM, LLC, 

Mt. Pleasant, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 24-6744 Doc: 12 Filed: 12/27/2024 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Michael Frasier appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of 

the magistrate judge and granting Defendants’ motion to dismiss Frasier’s 42 U.S.C. 

§ 1983 civil complaint as barred by the statute of limitations. We have reviewed the record 

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Frasier v. 

Pritchard, No. 2:23-cv-04163-DCC (D.S.C. July 16, 2024). We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

USCA4 Appeal: 24-6744 Doc: 12 Filed: 12/27/2024 Pg: 2 of 2