Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_09-cv-02504/USCOURTS-caed-2_09-cv-02504-3/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Gilbert Escobedo
Petitioner
S. Salinas
Respondent

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GILBERT ESCOBEDO,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-09-2504 JAM GGH P

vs.

S. SALINAS,

Defendant. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

On December 16, 2009, plaintiff’s request for a reconsideration of the

undersigned’s order dismissing plaintiff’s petition for writ of habeas corpus, re-designating the

case as a civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and granting plaintiff leave to file an

amended complaint was denied by the district judge. To date, plaintiff has not filed an amended

complaint. Therefore, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed with

prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of Title 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within

twenty days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file

written objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate 

\\\\\

Case 2:09-cv-02504-JAM-GGH Document 12 Filed 03/03/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections

within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. 

DATED: March 3, 2010

 /s/ Gregory G. Hollows

 

 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

esco2504.fta

Case 2:09-cv-02504-JAM-GGH Document 12 Filed 03/03/10 Page 2 of 2