Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_09-cr-00181/USCOURTS-caed-1_09-cr-00181-2/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Kevin Muzinich
Defendant
USA
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

* * * * *

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

vs.

KEVIN MUZINICH,

 Defendant.

 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO. 1:09-CR-00181 LJO

STIPULATION 

ORDER TO CONTINUE HEARING

DATE: June 26, 2009

TIME: 9:00 am

JUDGE: Hon. Lawrence J. O’Neill

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto through their respective 

counsel RICHARD A. BESHWATE, JR, attorney for Defendant, and MARLON COBAR, 

Assistant U.S. Attorney for Plaintiff, that the hearing currently scheduled for June 26, 2009,

at 9:00 a.m. shall be continued until JULY 10, 2009, at 9:00 a.m.

///

///

RICHARD A. BESHWATE, JR. 179782

ATTORNEY AT LAW

2014 TULARE STREET, SUITE 414

FRESNO, CALIFORNIA 93721

TELEPHONE: (559) 266-5000

FACSIMILE: (559) 266-0507

Attorney for Defendant, KEVIN MUZINICH

Case 1:09-cr-00181-LJO Document 14 Filed 06/25/09 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

This continuance is necessary because although the plea agreement has been filed, the attorney will

require time to prepare the defendant for hearing. In doing so, the matter will take only one appearance as

it will be settled on that date. Mr. Marlon Cobar, AUSA, has indicated he would have no objection to this

continuance.

DATED: June 25, 2009

Respectfully submitted,

/S/ Richard A. Beshwate, Jr.____________

RICHARD A. BESHWATE, JR.

Attorney for Defendant, KEVIN MUZINICH

DATED: June 25, 2009

Respectfully submitted,

/S/ Marlon Cobar ___

MARLON COBAR

Assistant U.S. Attorney

ORDER

The date set for hearing is continued to JULY 10, 2009 at 9 a.m. Good Cause is barely present. 

There is no explanation why the offer was not made, and thereafter reviewed by counsel and the defendant

within the time frame given when the continuance from the last status conference was granted. The

fact that counsel agreed to the date set is a statement of commitment to the Court. Counsel are admonished

that an agreed-upon date is an appointment with the Court that is to be taken seriously in the future.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 25, 2009 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill 

b9ed48 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:09-cr-00181-LJO Document 14 Filed 06/25/09 Page 2 of 2