Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_83-cv-00711/USCOURTS-cand-3_83-cv-00711-6/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Joseph S. Amundsen
Defendant
Securities And Exchange Commission
Plaintiff

Document Text:

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE

COMMISSION,

Plaintiff,

 v.

JOSEPH S. AMUNDSEN,

Defendant. /

No. C 83-00711 WHA

REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL

INFORMATION 

By FRIDAY, JANUARY 20, 2012, AT NOON, both sides shall make submissions explaining

the role of FINRA in the controversy and the term FOCUS. Is the Commission also trying to

terminate his FINRA and FOCUS work, and, if so, on what basis? Is this true even for filings not

signed by him but which include his work? Was FINRA even in existence in 1983? In addition,

please state the date Mr. Amundsen regained his CPA license and the date of the first audit report

by him covering financial statements filed with the Commission after the consent decree.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 10, 2011. WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:83-cv-00711-WHA Document 36 Filed 01/10/12 Page 1 of 1