Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-00881/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-00881-3/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Norma A. Borrett
Plaintiff
Horizon Charter Schools
Defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

NORMA A. BORRETT,

Plaintiff,

v.

HORIZON CHARTER SCHOOLS,

Defendant.

No. 2:15-cv-0881 GEB CKD PS (TEMP)

ORDER

Plaintiff Norma Borrett is proceeding in this action pro se. This matter was, therefore,

referred to the undersigned in accordance with Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). 

On January 28, 2016, defendant filed an answer.1 

Accordingly, pursuant to the provisions of Rule 16 of the Federal Rules of Civil 

Procedure, IT IS ORDERED that:

1. A Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference is set for Wednesday, May 4, 2016, at 

10:00 a.m., at the United States District Court, 501 I Street, Sacramento, California, in 

Courtroom No. 24, before the undersigned.

////

 

1 On February 12, 2016, the court received a letter from plaintiff asking that the court wait to 

schedule this action to allow time for the parties to explore settlement. The court assumes the 

parties have had sufficient time but if additional time is required the parties may request that the 

court continue the May 4, 2016 status conference. 

Case 2:15-cv-00881-DB Document 29 Filed 03/21/16 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

2. All parties are required to appear at the Status Conference, either by counsel or, if 

proceeding in propria persona, on his or her own behalf. 

3. Plaintiff shall file and serve status reports on or before April 20, 2016, and defendant 

shall file and serve a status report on or before April 27, 2016. Each party’s status report shall 

address all of the following matters:

a. Progress of service of process;

b. Possible joinder of additional parties;

c. Possible amendment of the pleadings;

d. Jurisdiction and venue;

e. Anticipated motions and the scheduling thereof;

f. Anticipated discovery and the scheduling thereof, including disclosure of 

expert witnesses;

g. Future proceedings, including the setting of appropriate cut-off dates for 

discovery and for law and motion, and the scheduling of a final pretrial 

conference and trial;

h. Modification of standard pretrial procedures specified by the rules due to 

the relative simplicity or complexity of the action;

i. Whether the case is related to any other case, including matters in 

bankruptcy;

j. Whether the parties will stipulate to the magistrate judge assigned to this 

matter acting as settlement judge, waiving any disqualification by virtue of 

his so acting, or whether they prefer to have a Settlement Conference 

before another magistrate judge;

k. Whether the parties intend to consent to proceed before a United States 

Magistrate Judge; and

l. Any other matters that may aid in the just and expeditious disposition of 

this action.

/////

/////

/////

Case 2:15-cv-00881-DB Document 29 Filed 03/21/16 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3

4. The parties are cautioned that failure to file a status report or failure to appear at the 

status conference may result in an order imposing an appropriate sanction. See Local Rules 110 

and 183.

Dated: March 21, 2016

BVD\borrett0881.stat.conf

_____________________________________

CAROLYN K. DELANEY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:15-cv-00881-DB Document 29 Filed 03/21/16 Page 3 of 3