Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_14-cv-01466/USCOURTS-caed-1_14-cv-01466-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Kaiser Foundation Health Plan, Inc.
Defendant
Nicasio Sandoval
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

NICASIO SANDOVAL,

Plaintiff,

v.

KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH 

PLAN, INC.,

Defendant.

No. 1:14-CV-01466-GEB-BAM 

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION 

AS MOOT

On November 24, 2014 Defendant Kaiser Foundation Health 

Plan, Inc. filed a motion to dismiss or alternatively to transfer 

venue and for a more definite statement. (ECF No. 7.) However, 

Plaintiff timely filed a First Amended Complaint on December 5, 

2014, which is now the operative pleading. See Hal Roach Studios, 

Inc. v. Richard Feiner & Co., Inc., 896 F.2d 1542, 1546 (9th Cir. 

1989) (stating “an amended pleading supersedes the original”). 

Since the referenced dismissal motion does not address 

the operative pleading, it is denied as moot. 

Dated: January 6, 2015

Case 1:14-cv-01466-GEB-BAM Document 16 Filed 01/07/15 Page 1 of 1