Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-00885/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-00885-2/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Liudmyla Iegorova
Plaintiff
Shailesh Jawale
Defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LIUDMYLA IEGOROVA,

Plaintiff,

v.

SHAILESH JAWALE,

Defendant.

No. 2:15-cv-0885 TLN CKD PS

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

By order filed June 16, 2015, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed and thirty days leave to 

file an amended complaint was granted. The thirty day period has now expired, and plaintiff has 

not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court’s order.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without 

prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 

after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written 

objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned 

“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Failure to file objections 

/////

/////

Case 2:15-cv-00885-TLN-CKD Document 6 Filed 07/23/15 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. 

Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

Dated: July 23, 2015

4 iegorova0885.fta

_____________________________________

CAROLYN K. DELANEY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:15-cv-00885-TLN-CKD Document 6 Filed 07/23/15 Page 2 of 2