Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_09-cv-02516/USCOURTS-cand-4_09-cv-02516-9/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
City of Richmond
Defendant
East Bay Outdoor, Inc.
Plaintiff
Jeffrey Herson
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEPOSITION; [PROPOSED] ORDER

CASE NO. 9-cv-02516-PJH

RANDY RIDDLE (CA State Bar No. 121788) 

CITY ATTORNEY 

KEVIN SCOTT DICKEY (CA State Bar No. 184251) 

CHIEF DEPUTY CITY ATTORNEY 

CITY OF RICHMOND 

450 Civic Center Plaza 

Richmond, CA 94804-1630 

Telephone: (510) 620-6509 

Facsimile: (510) 620-6518 

randy riddle@ci.richmond.ca.us 

ANDREW W. SCHWARTZ (CA State Bar No. 87699) 

MATTHEW D. ZINN (CA State Bar No. 214587) 

WINTER KING (CA State Bar No. 237958) 

SHUTE, MIHALY & WEINBERGER LLP 

396 Hayes Street 

San Francisco, CA 94102 

Telephone: (415) 552-7272 

Facsimile: (415) 552-5816 

Schwartz@smwlaw.com 

Zinn@smwlaw.com 

King@smwlaw.com 

Attorneys for Defendant 

CITY OF RICHMOND 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

OAKLAND DIVISION 

JEFFREY HERSON, an individual; EAST 

BAY OUTDOOR, INC., a California 

corporation, 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

CITY OF RICHMOND, a charter city, 

Defendant. 

 Case No. 4:09-cv-02516-PJH 

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR 

DEPOSITION BEYOND DISCOVERY 

CUTOFF; [PROPOSED] ORDER 

Judge: Honorable Phyllis J. Hamilton 

Dept.: Courtroom 3 

Trial Date: None set 

Case 4:09-cv-02516-PJH Document 71 Filed 08/17/10 Page 1 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEPOSITION; [PROPOSED] ORDER

CASE NO. 9-cv-02516-PJH

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs have noticed a deposition of Defendant’s person or persons most 

knowledgeable pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 30(b)(6) for August 17, 2010 (“PMK Deposition”); 

WHEREAS, given the numerous subjects included in the notice, the preparation required 

for the PMK Deposition will be extensive, Defendant wishes to extend the date of the deposition 

to September 7, 2010; 

WHEREAS, this Court’s Case Management and Pretrial Order establishes August 25, 

2010 as the cutoff for non-expert discovery; 

WHEREAS, the parties cannot agree about whether that cutoff should be extended, and 

Defendant plans to apply separately to this Court to extend the cutoff, but the parties have 

agreed to request that this Court allow the PMK Deposition to occur after the existing cutoff; 

and 

WHEREAS, although this stipulation involves a discovery matter, because it also 

involves an exception to a deadline set in this Court’s Case Management and Pretrial Order, it 

has not been designated in the caption as a discovery matter. 

NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereby agree and request that the Court order as 

follows: 

1. Notwithstanding the non-expert discovery cutoff presently set for August 25, 

2010, the deposition noticed by Plaintiffs pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 30(b)(6) for August 17, 

2010 shall be held instead on September 7, 2010 at the same time and place indicated in the 

notice of deposition. 

2. Defendant waives notice of the new date of the PMK Deposition. 

DATED: August 11, 2010 SHUTE, MIHALY & WEINBERGER LLP 

By: /s/ Matthew D. Zinn 

MATTHEW D. ZINN 

Attorneys for Defendant 

CITY OF RICHMOND 

Case 4:09-cv-02516-PJH Document 71 Filed 08/17/10 Page 2 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEPOSITION; [PROPOSED] ORDER

CASE NO. 9-cv-02516-PJH

DATED: August 11, 2010 BOSTWICK & JASSY LLP 

By: 

/s/ Gary L. Bostwick (concurrence in filing 

obtained on August 11, 2010) 

GARY L. BOSTWICK 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

JEFFREY HERSON and EAST BAY OUTDOOR, 

INC. 

Case 4:09-cv-02516-PJH Document 71 Filed 08/17/10 Page 3 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEPOSITION; [PROPOSED] ORDER

CASE NO. 9-cv-02516-PJH

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Pursuant to stipulation, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 

1. Notwithstanding the non-expert discovery cutoff presently set for August 25, 

2010, the deposition noticed by Plaintiffs pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 30(b)(6) for August 17, 

2010 shall be held instead on September 7, 2010 at the same time and place indicated in the 

notice of deposition. 

2. Plaintiffs need not serve a revised notice of deposition reflecting the new date. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: August ___, 2010 

HON. PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON 

United States District Judge 

17

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton

Case 4:09-cv-02516-PJH Document 71 Filed 08/17/10 Page 4 of 4