Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-09-08222/USCOURTS-ca4-09-08222-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Keith Darnell McNeill
Appellant
United States of America
Appellee

Document Text:

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-8222

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

KEITH DARNELL MCNEILL, a/k/a No Doubt,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Newport News. Henry Coke Morgan, Jr., 

Senior District Judge. (4:08-cr-00012-HCM-FBS-1)

Submitted: March 30, 2010 Decided: April 5, 2010

Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Keith Darnell McNeill, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Edward 

Bradenham, II, Assistant United States Attorney, Newport News, 

Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 09-8222 Doc: 15 Filed: 04/05/2010 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Keith Darnell McNeill appeals the district court’s 

order denying his motion for a reduction of sentence filed 

pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the 

record and find the district court did not abuse its discretion 

in denying the motion. See United States v. Munn, __ F.3d __, 

2010 WL 546486, at *3 (4th Cir. Feb. 17, 2010) (No. 09-7525). 

Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order for the 

reasons stated there. See United States v. McNeill, No. 4:08-

cr-00012-HCM-FBS-1 (E.D. Va. Nov. 30, 2009). Further, we deny 

McNeill’s motion for the appointment of counsel. We dispense 

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before the court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Appeal: 09-8222 Doc: 15 Filed: 04/05/2010 Pg: 2 of 2