Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-01052/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-01052-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Donald Peel
Plaintiff
Unknown
Defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DONALD PEEL,

Plaintiff,

v.

UNKNOWN,

Defendants.

No. 2:15-cv-1052 CKD P

ORDER AND 

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

By an order filed May 18, 2015, plaintiff was ordered to file a completed in forma 

pauperis application within thirty days and was cautioned that failure to do so would result in a 

recommendation that this action be dismissed. The thirty day period has now expired, and 

plaintiff has not responded to the court’s order and has not filed a completed application. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the clerk of the court assign a district court 

judge to this case; and

IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENEDED that this action be dismissed.

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 

after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections 

with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings 

and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified 

Case 2:15-cv-01052-WBS-CKD Document 7 Filed 06/29/15 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 

(9th Cir. 1991).

Dated: June 26, 2015

1

peel1052.fifp

_____________________________________

CAROLYN K. DELANEY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:15-cv-01052-WBS-CKD Document 7 Filed 06/29/15 Page 2 of 2