Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_09-cv-00427/USCOURTS-cand-3_09-cv-00427-3/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Ben Curry
Respondent
John Williams
Petitioner

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOHN WILLIAMS, J-42019,

Petitioner,

 vs.

BEN CURRY, Warden,

Respondent. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. C 09-0427 CRB (PR)

ORDER REQUESTING

SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING

A recent en banc decision from the Ninth Circuit addressed important issues

relating to federal review of parole decisions in California. See Hayward v. Marshall,

No. 06-55392, 2010 WL 1664977 (9th Cir. April 22, 2010) (en banc). The court

requests that the parties submit supplemental briefs (not to exceed 12 pages in length)

explaining their views on how the Hayward en banc decision applies to this parole

denial habeas case. The court sets the following schedule:

1. Within 10 days of this order, respondent shall send to petitioner a copy

of the Hayward decision. 

2. Within 30 days of this order, respondent shall file with the court and

serve on petitioner a supplemental brief on the impact of Hayward on this action. 

3. Within 15 days thereafter, petitioner may file with the court and serve on

respondent a supplemental brief on the impact of Hayward on this action. 

SO ORDERED.

DATED: April 30, 2010 

CHARLES R. BREYER

United States District Judge

G:\PRO-SE\CRB\HC.09\Williams, J1.or1.wpd

Case 3:09-cv-00427-CRB Document 13 Filed 05/04/10 Page 1 of 1