Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-09-08249/USCOURTS-ca4-09-08249-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Captain Brihart
Appellee
Mr. Burtt
Appellee
Director Ozmint
Appellee
Deborah Rowe
Appellee
Cecil Simmons
Appellant

Document Text:

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-8249

CECIL SIMMONS,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

DIRECTOR OZMINT; CAPTAIN BRIHART; DEBORAH ROWE, Hearing 

Officer; MR. BURTT,

Defendants – Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Greenville. R. Bryan Harwell, District 

Judge. (6:08-cv-00860-RBH)

Submitted: May 20, 2010 Decided: May 25, 2010

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Cecil Simmons, Appellant Pro Se. William Henry Davidson, II, 

Matthew Blaine Rosbrugh, DAVIDSON, MORRISON & LINDEMANN, PA, 

Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 09-8249 Doc: 10 Filed: 05/25/2010 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Cecil Simmons appeals the district court’s order 

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying 

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have 

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, 

we deny Simmons’s motion for appointment of counsel and affirm 

for the reasons stated by the district court. Simmons v. 

Ozmint, No. 6:08-cv-00860-RBH (D.S.C. Dec. 4, 2009). We dispense 

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before the court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Appeal: 09-8249 Doc: 10 Filed: 05/25/2010 Pg: 2 of 2