Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca9-11-50004/USCOURTS-ca9-11-50004-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
John Dennis Apel
Appellant
United States of America
Appellee

Document Text:

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

JOHN DENNIS APEL,

Defendant-Appellant.

No. 11-50003

D.C. No.

2:10-cr-00830-

JFW-1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

JOHN DENNIS APEL,

Defendant-Appellant.

No. 11-50004

D.C. No.

2:10-cr-00869-

JFW-1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

JOHN DENNIS APEL,

Defendant-Appellant.

No. 11-50005

D.C. No.

2:10-cr-00831-

JFW-1

OPINION

On Remand From The United States Supreme Court

 Case: 11-50004, 08/14/2014, ID: 9204604, DktEntry: 51, Page 1 of 2
2 UNITED STATES V. APEL

Filed August 14, 2014

Before: Barry G. Silverman and Johnnie B. Rawlinson,

Circuit Judges, and John R. Tunheim, District Judge.*

Per Curiam Opinion

COUNSEL

Erwin Chemerinsky, Selwyn Chu (argued) and Matthew

Plunkett (argued), law students, University of California,

Irvine School of Law, for Defendant-Appellant.

André Birotte Jr., United States Attorney, Robert E. Dugdale

and Mark R. Yohalem (argued), Assistant United States

Attorneys, Los Angeles, California, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

On February 26, 2014, the United States Supreme Court

vacated our opinion at 676 F.3d 1202 and remanded the case

to us for further proceedings consistent with its opinion. 

United States v. Apel, __ U.S. __, 134 S.Ct. 1144 (2014).

In light of the Supreme Court’s decision, the judgment of

the district court is AFFIRMED.

* The Honorable John R. Tunheim, United States District Judge for the

District of Minnesota, sitting by designation.

 Case: 11-50004, 08/14/2014, ID: 9204604, DktEntry: 51, Page 2 of 2