Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca5-15-40946/USCOURTS-ca5-15-40946-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Ramon Dario Lemus-Perdomo
Appellant
United States of America
Appellee

Document Text:

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-40946

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

RAMON DARIO LEMUS-PERDOMO,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:14-CR-667-1

Before WIENER, HIGGINSON, and COSTA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Ramon Dario Lemus-Perdomo has 

moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. 

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th 

Cir. 2011). Lemus-Perdomo has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s 

brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as 

Lemus-Perdomo’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

March 8, 2016

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 15-40946 Document: 00513411004 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/08/2016
No. 15-40946

2

appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, 

counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from 

further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR.

R. 42.2. Lemus-Perdomo’s incorporated motion for the appointment of 

substitute counsel is DENIED. 

 Case: 15-40946 Document: 00513411004 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/08/2016