Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cr-00267/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cr-00267-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Joe Milam Cathey
Defendant
USA
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIP & [PROP.] ORDER

06-327 SI

KEVIN V. RYAN (CSBN 118321)

United States Attorney

MARK L. KROTOSKI (CSBN 138549)

Chief, Criminal Division

TRACIE L. BROWN (CSBN 184339)

Assistant United States Attorney

450 Golden Gate Avenue, Box 36055

San Francisco, CA 94102

Telephone: (415) 436-6917

Facsimile: (415) 436-7234

Attorneys for Plaintiff

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

JOE MILAM CATHEY,

Defendant.

 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CR 06-267 SI

[PROPOSED] ORDER AND STIPULATION

(1) EXCLUDING TIME FROM JUNE 9,

2006 TO JULY 7, 2006 FROM THE

SPEEDY TRIAL ACT CALCULATION 

(18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(A))

The parties appeared before the Honorable Susan Illston on June 9, 2006. 

With the agreement of counsel for both parties, the Court found and held as follows:

1. The parties agree to an exclusion of time under the Speedy Trial Act from June 9, 2006 to

July 7, 2006, in light of the need for the defendant’s counsel to review recently-produced

discovery. Failure to grant the requested continuance would unreasonably deny defense counsel

reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due

diligence and the need for new counsel to review the discovery with the defendant, and would

deny both the defendant continuity of counsel. 

2. Given these circumstances, the Court found that the ends of justice served by excluding 

Case 3:06-cr-00267-SI Document 12 Filed 06/21/2006 Page 1 of 2
 Case 3:06-cr-00267-SI Document 13 Filed 06/23/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIP & [PROP.] ORDER

06-327 SI 2

the period from June 9, 2006, to July 7, 2006 outweigh the best interest of the public and the

defendant in a speedy trial. Id. § 3161(h)(8)(A). 

4. Accordingly, and with the consent of the defendant, the Court ordered that the period from

June 9, 2006 to July 7, 2006 be excluded from Speedy Trial Act calculations under 18 U.S.C. §

3161(h)(8)(A) & (B)(iv). 

5. The Court schedules a status hearing on July 7, 2006.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

DATED: June 15, 2006 /S/ 

TRACIE L. BROWN

Assistant United States Attorney

DATED: June 20, 2006 /S/ 

 STEVEN KALAR

Attorney for Joe Milam Cathey

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED:_____________________ ________________________________

THE HON. SUSAN ILLSTON

United States District Judge

Case 3:06-cr-00267-SI Document 12 Filed 06/21/2006 Page 2 of 2
 Case 3:06-cr-00267-SI Document 13 Filed 06/23/06 Page 2 of 2