Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01103/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01103-6/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Dr. Akanno
Defendant
Tristan D. Allan
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Plaintiff Tristan D. Allan (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding se and in forma pauperis in 

this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeds on Plaintiff’s 

complaint against Defendant Akanno for deliberate indifference to medical needs in violation of the 

Eighth Amendment of the United States Constitution. (ECF Nos. 1, 11.) A telephonic trial 

confirmation hearing is set for May 18, 2015. However, neither party has filed a timely pretrial 

statement in accordance with the Second Scheduling Order issued on January 6, 2015. (ECF No. 25.) 

A jury trial is set for June 30, 2015. 

On April 29, 2015, Plaintiff filed a “Notice of Tentative Resolution.” The notice indicates that 

the parties have tentatively agreed to a resolution of this matter and they will file a stipulation of 

dismissal following satisfaction of Defendant’s obligations under the terms of the tentative agreement. 

(ECF No. 33.) 

TRISTAN D. ALLAN,

 Plaintiff,

v.

DR. AKANNO,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: 1:12-cv-01103-AWI-BAM PC

ORDER AFTER SETTLEMENT

(ECF No. 33)

Case 1:12-cv-01103-AWI-BAM Document 34 Filed 05/05/15 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Based on Plaintiff’s notice, and pursuant to this Court’s Local Rule 160, the Court ORDERS 

the parties, no later than May 20, 2015, to file appropriate papers to dismiss or conclude this action in 

its entirety. An extension of this deadline will be granted only on a showing of good cause. 

This Court VACATES all pending dates and matters.

Failure to comply with this order may be grounds for the imposition of sanctions on counsel or 

parties who contributed to violation of this order. See Local Rule 160 and Local Rule 272.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 5, 2015 /s/ Barbara A. McAuliffe _

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:12-cv-01103-AWI-BAM Document 34 Filed 05/05/15 Page 2 of 2