Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cr-00188/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cr-00188-2/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Isaac Nicholas Garcia
Defendant
USA
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]

ORDER EXCLUDING TIME

CR 06-00188 SI

KEVIN V. RYAN (CSBN 118321)

United States Attorney

EUMI L. CHOI (WVBN 0722)

Chief, Criminal Division

WILLIAM C. MARTIN (ILBN 6272668)

Assistant United States Attorney

450 Golden Gate Avenue

San Francisco, California 94102

Telephone: (415) 436-7220

Facsimile: (415) 436-7234

Email: william.c.martin@usdoj.gov

Attorneys for Plaintiff

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

ISAAC NICHOLAS GARCIA,

Defendant.

 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Criminal No. CR 06-00188 SI

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]

ORDER EXCLUDING TIME

The above-captioned matter came before the Court on May 12, 2006 for an initial

appearance. The defendant was represented by David W. Fermino and the government was

represented by William C. Martin, Assistant United States Attorney. This case was then

continued until May 26, 2006, at 11:00 A.M. for status and the possible setting of a motion

schedule or trial date.

The Court made a finding on the record that the time from and including May 12

through and including May 26, 2006, should be excluded under the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C.

§ 3161(h)(8)(A), because the ends of justice served by taking such action outweighed the best

Case 3:06-cr-00188-SI Document 8 Filed 05/12/2006 Page 1 of 2
 Case 3:06-cr-00188-SI Document 10 Filed 05/16/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]

ORDER EXCLUDING TIME

CR 06-00188 SI 2

interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. That finding was based on the need for

the defendant to have reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the

exercise of due diligence, and for continuity of counsel pursuant to 18 U.S.C.

§ 3161(h)(8)(B)(iv). 

The parties hereby agree to and request that the case be continued until May 26, 2006,

and that the exclusion of time until then be granted. The parties agree and stipulate that the

additional time is appropriate and necessary under Title 18, United States Code, Section

3161(h)(8)(A), because the ends of justice served by this continuance outweigh the best interest

of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. This time exclusion will allow defense counsel

to effectively prepare, taking into account the exercise of due diligence, and will provide for

continuity of counsel for the defendant.

DATED: 5/12/06 /s/ 

DAVID FERMINO

Attorney for Defendant

DATED: 5/12/06 /s/ 

WILLIAM C. MARTIN

Assistant U.S. Attorney

So ordered.

DATED: 

SUSAN ILLSTON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

Case 3:06-cr-00188-SI Document 8 Filed 05/12/2006 Page 2 of 2
 Case 3:06-cr-00188-SI Document 10 Filed 05/16/06 Page 2 of 2