Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-07-01278/USCOURTS-ca4-07-01278-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Donatus I. Amaram
Appellant
W. Eric Thomas
Appellee
Virginia State University
Appellee

Document Text:

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-1278

DONATUS I. AMARAM, Ph.D.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

VIRGINIA STATE UNIVERSITY; W. ERIC THOMAS,

Ph.D., In his Official Capacity as Provost,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, Chief

District Judge. (3:06-cv-00444-JRS)

Submitted: December 14, 2007 Decided: January 7, 2008

Before WILKINSON, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Wayne Marcus Scriven, SCRIVEN LAW OFFICES, Arlington, Virginia, for

Appellant. Robert F. McDonnell, Attorney General of Virginia,

William Cleveland Mims, Chief Deputy Attorney General, Maureen

Riley Matsen, Deputy Attorney General, Sydney E. Rab, Senior

Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 07-1278 Doc: 28 Filed: 01/07/2008 Pg: 1 of 2
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Donatus I. Amaram appeals the district court’s orders

dismissing his claims of discrimination, retaliation, violation of

due process, and breach of contract against his employer Virginia

State University and its Provost. We have reviewed the briefs and

the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm

for the reasons stated by the district court. Amaram v. Virginia

State University, No. 3:06-cv-00444-JRS (E.D. Va. Sept. 14, 2006

and Feb. 20, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Appeal: 07-1278 Doc: 28 Filed: 01/07/2008 Pg: 2 of 2