Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca5-14-50807/USCOURTS-ca5-14-50807-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Filiberto Mascorro-Cruz
Appellant
United States of America
Appellee

Document Text:

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

___________________ 

No. 14-50807

Summary Calendar

___________________ 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee

v.

FILIBERTO MASCORRO-CRUZ,

 Defendant - Appellant

_______________________ 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Western District of Texas

USDC No. 3:14-CR-680-1

_______________________ 

Before KING, JOLLY, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

IT IS ORDERED that appellee’s unopposed motion to remand case to the 

district court to modify the written judgment to conform with the oral 

pronouncement is GRANTED. At sentencing, the district court stated that it 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

March 11, 2015

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 

Case: 14-50807 Document: 00512966040 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/11/2015
No. 14-50807

“would order up to 1 year of intermittent confinement to be imposed only upon 

a violation of the conditions of your supervised release.” (emphasis added). The 

district court’s written judgment states: “The defendant shall remain in the 

custody of the Bureau of Prisons during nights, weekends, or other intervals of 

time, totaling no more than the lesser of one year or the term of imprisonment 

authorized for the offense, during the first year of probation or supervised 

release as ordered by the Court.” Mascorro-Cruz’s sentence is VACATED in 

PART, and this matter is REMANDED to the district court with instructions 

to conform the written judgment to the oral pronouncement at sentencing. See 

United States v. Torres-Aguilar, 352 F.3d 934, 935 (5th Cir. 2003). The 

judgment, as so modified, is AFFIRMED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the appellee’s alternative motion to 

extend time to file brief of appellee for 30 days from the denial of the motion to 

remand is DENIED.

2

Case: 14-50807 Document: 00512966040 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/11/2015