Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca5-13-20771/USCOURTS-ca5-13-20771-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Eduardo Perez-Rodriguez
Appellant
United States of America
Appellee

Document Text:

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-20771

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

EDUARDO PEREZ-RODRIGUEZ, also known as Eduardo Perez, also known 

as Eduardo Perez Rodriguez,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:13-CR-495-1

Before PRADO, OWEN, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Eduardo Perez-Rodriguez has 

moved for leave to withdraw. He has filed a brief and a supplemental brief in 

accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States 

v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Perez-Rodriguez has not filed a 

response to either of counsel’s briefs.

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

June 12, 2015

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 13-20771 Document: 00513077163 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/12/2015
No. 13-20771

2

We have reviewed counsel’s briefs and the relevant portions of the record 

reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal 

presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s 

motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further 

responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

Case: 13-20771 Document: 00513077163 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/12/2015