Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca11-16-10592/USCOURTS-ca11-16-10592-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Craig Lamar Elkins
Appellant
United States of America
Appellee

Document Text:

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 16-10592

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D.C. Docket No. 2:15-cr-00022-LGW-RSB-1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

CRAIG LAMAR ELKINS,

 Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Georgia

________________________

(December 28, 2016)

Before JULIE CARNES, JILL PRYOR and BLACK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Nathan Williams, appointed counsel for Craig Elkins in this direct criminal 

appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and 

USCA11 Case: 16-10592 Date Filed: 12/28/2016 Page: 1 of 2
2

filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our 

independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the 

relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the 

entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is 

GRANTED, and Elkins’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

USCA11 Case: 16-10592 Date Filed: 12/28/2016 Page: 2 of 2