Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_15-cv-00444/USCOURTS-caed-1_15-cv-00444-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Kenneth Menis
Defendant
Mary Menis
Defendant
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Defendants Kenneth Menis and Mary Menis seek the removal of the unlawful detainer action 

initiated by Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., in Kern County Superior Court Case No. S-1500-CL-288527. 

(Doc. 1.) Because an action for unlawful detainer arises under California law, the Magistrate Judge 

found the Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction over the complaint and recommended the action be 

remanded to the Kern County Superior Court on March 26, 2015. (Doc. 6.) Plaintiffs were given 

fourteen days to file any objections to the recommendation. (Id. at 4.) In addition, they were “advised 

that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s 

order.” (Id., citing Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991)). However, no objections have 

been filed. 

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(C) and Britt v. Simi Valley United 

School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983), this Court conducted a de novo review of the case. 

Having carefully reviewed the file, the Court finds the Findings and Recommendations are supported 

WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.,

 Plaintiff,

v.

KENNETH MENIS, et al.,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: 1:15-cv-00444- AWI - JLT

ORDER ADOPTING IN FULL THE FINDINGS 

AND RECOMMENDATIONS REMANDING THE 

MATTER TO KERN COUNTY SUPERIOR 

COURT

Case 1:15-cv-00444-AWI-JLT Document 8 Filed 04/16/15 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

by the record and proper analysis. 

Based upon the foregoing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:

1. The Findings and Recommendations filed March 26, 2015 (Doc. 6) are ADOPTED IN 

FULL;

2. The matter is REMANDED to the Superior Court of Kern County; and

3. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to close this action, because this Order terminates 

the matter in its entirety.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 15, 2015 

 SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:15-cv-00444-AWI-JLT Document 8 Filed 04/16/15 Page 2 of 2