Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca11-14-13542/USCOURTS-ca11-14-13542-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Dennis Mark Montana
Appellant-Cross Appellee
Rebekah J. Patterson
Appellant-Cross Appellee
Western Heritage Insurance Company
Appellee-Cross Appellant

Document Text:

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

Nos. 14-13542 & 14-13657

________________________

D.C. Docket No. 8:13-cv-01116-SCB-TGW

WESTERN HERITAGE INSURANCE COMPANY,

Plaintiff - Counter

 Defendant - Appellee

 Cross Appellant,

versus

DENNIS MARK MONTANA, 

a Guardian of Paul N. Blevins, as Assignee of Suncoast Preferred 

Investment Corp., 

REBEKAH J. PATTERSON, as Guardian of minor children,

D.B., D.B., F.B., as Assignee of Suncoast Preferred Investment Corp., 

Defendants - Counter

 Claimants – Counter

Defendants - Appellants

 Cross-Appellees. 

________________________

Nos. 15-10967 & 15-11166

________________________

D.C. Docket No. 8:13-cv-01116-SCB-TGW

USCA11 Case: 14-13542 Date Filed: 11/23/2015 Page: 1 of 3
2

WESTERN HERITAGE INSURANCE COMPANY, 

an Arizona corporation,

Plaintiff - Counter

 Defendant - Appellant

 Cross-Appellee,

versus

DENNIS MARK MONTANA, 

as Guardian of Paul N. Blevins, as Assignee of Suncoast Preferred 

Investment Corp., a Florida citizen, 

REBEKAH J. PATTERSON, as Guardian of minor children, 

D.B., D.B., F.B., as Assignee of Suncoast Preferred Investment Corp., 

a Florida citizen,

Defendants - Counter

 Claimants – Counter

Defendants - Appellees 

 Cross-Appellants. 

_______________________

Appeals from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Florida

________________________

(November 23, 2015)

Before ROSENBAUM, JULIE CARNES, and DUBINA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: 

We have before us the related appeals and cross-appeals in an insurancecoverage dispute between the Western Heritage Insurance Company (“Western 

Heritage”) and the guardians of Paul Blevins and Blevins’s children (“Blevins”). 

We have carefully reviewed the record and the parties’ briefs, and we have had the 

USCA11 Case: 14-13542 Date Filed: 11/23/2015 Page: 2 of 3
3

benefit of oral argument. We now affirm the district court’s orders in all respects 

for the reasons articulated by the district court in its orders.

AFFIRMED.

USCA11 Case: 14-13542 Date Filed: 11/23/2015 Page: 3 of 3