Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca11-15-10018/USCOURTS-ca11-15-10018-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
William E. Jackson
Appellant
United States of America
Appellee

Document Text:

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 15-10018

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D.C. Docket No. 1:14-cr-00057-WS-B-1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

WILLIAM E. JACKSON,

Defendant-Appellant.

__________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the Southern District of Alabama

_________________________

(August 11, 2015)

Before HULL, ROSENBAUM and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

William Gregory Hughes, appointed counsel for William E. Jackson in this 

direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the 

appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 

1396, 18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record 

USCA11 Case: 15-10018 Date Filed: 08/11/2015 Page: 1 of 2
2

reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. 

Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of 

merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Jackson’s conviction and 

sentence are AFFIRMED.

USCA11 Case: 15-10018 Date Filed: 08/11/2015 Page: 2 of 2