Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_06-cv-00402/USCOURTS-cand-4_06-cv-00402-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Acutherm, L.P.
Counter-defendant
Air System Components, LP
Counter-claimant
Rickard Air Diffusion, Inc.
Defendant

Document Text:

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 - 1 - 

ORDER FOR DISMISSAL 

CASE NO. C 06-0402 CW

DAVID J. BREZNER (SB 38420) 

SRI K. SANKARAN (SB 236584) 

DIANE J. MASON (SB 168202) 

VICTOR E. JOHNSON (SB 226538) 

DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP 

555 California Street, Suite 1000 

San Francisco, CA 94104-1513 

Telephone: (415) 781-1989 

Facsimile: (415) 398-3249 

E-Mail: Brezner.David@Dorsey.com 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

Acutherm, L.P.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

ACUTHERM, L.P., a California Limited 

Partnership, 

 Plaintiff, 

 vs. 

 

RICKARD AIR DIFFUSION, INC., a North 

Carolina Corporation; and AIR SYSTEM 

COMPONENTS, LP, a Delaware Limited 

Partnership, 

 Defendants. 

Case No. C 06-0402 CW 

ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITHOUT 

PREJUDICE 

AIR SYSTEM COMPONENTS, LP, a 

Delaware Limited Partnership, 

 Counterclaimant, 

 vs. 

ACUTHERM, L.P., a California Limited 

Partnership, 

 Counterdefendant. 

 Pursuant to the stipulation of Plaintiff Acutherm L.P. (“Acutherm”) and Defendant Air 

System Components, L.P. (“Air System”), and in view of the fact that Defendant Rickard Air 

Case 4:06-cv-00402-CW Document 15 Filed 08/10/06 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 - 2 - 

ORDER FOR DISMISSAL 

CASE NO. C 06-0402 CW

Diffusion, Inc. (“Rickard”), has not answered or entered an appearance in this case, IT IS 

HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 

 1. Acutherm’s Complaint against Air System and Rickard is hereby DISMISSED 

WITHOUT PREJUDICE, with all parties to bear their own costs, expenses and attorneys fees. 

 2. Air System’s Counterclaim against Acutherm is hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT 

PREJUDICE, with all parties to bear their own costs, expenses and attorneys fees. 

 3. IT IS SO ORDERED. 

LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY. 

 

DATED: August 10, 2006 /s/ CLAUDIA WILKEN 

 ____________________________________

 The Honorable Claudia Wilken 

 United States District Judge 

Case 4:06-cv-00402-CW Document 15 Filed 08/10/06 Page 2 of 2