Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-01396/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-01396-6/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Justin Lomako
Plaintiff
S. Whitlach
Defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JUSTIN LOMAKO,

Plaintiff,

vs.

S. WHITLACH, et al.,

Defendants.

________________________________/

1:05-cv-01396-LJO-NEW(DLB) PC

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE THIRD

AMENDED COMPLAINT, BUT GRANTING

THIRTY-DAY EXTENSION OF TIME TO

FILE OBJECTION TO FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

(DOCUMENT #16)

Plaintiff is a prisoner proceeding pro se in a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §

1983. On June 20, 2007, the court issued a Findings and Recommendations recommending

dismissal of this action, with prejudice, for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be

granted. On July 16, 2007, plaintiff filed a motion seeking an extension of time to file an

amended complaint in compliance with the court’s order. 

Plaintiff has not been ordered to file a third amended complaint. Plaintiff has had two

opportunities to amend. (Docs. 9, 11, 13, 14.) At this stage in the proceedings, a Findings and

Recommendations has been issued and plaintiff may file an Objection. 

///

///

///

Case 1:05-cv-01396-LJO -GSA Document 17 Filed 08/23/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Therefore, plaintiff’s motion for an extension of time to file a third amended complaint is

DENIED, but plaintiff is GRANTED a thirty (30) day extension of time to file an Objection to

the Findings and Recommendations. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: August 21, 2007 /s/ Dennis L. Beck 

i0d3h8 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:05-cv-01396-LJO -GSA Document 17 Filed 08/23/07 Page 2 of 2