Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-07-04494/USCOURTS-ca4-07-04494-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Jammie C. Reid
Appellant
United States of America
Appellee

Document Text:

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-4494

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

JAMMIE C. REID,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Greenville. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District

Judge. (6:04-cr-01009-HMH)

Submitted: November 6, 2007 Decided: December 4, 2007

Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

David W. Plowden, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Greenville,

South Carolina, for Appellant. William Corley Lucius, Assistant

United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 07-4494 Doc: 18 Filed: 12/04/2007 Pg: 1 of 3
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Jammie C. Reid appeals the district court’s order

revoking his supervised probation and sentencing him to nine

months’ imprisonment. Counsel filed a brief pursuant to Anders v.

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), asserting there are no

non-frivolous grounds for appeal but questioning whether the

sentence imposed was reasonable. Reid was advised of his right to

file a pro se supplemental brief, but has not done so. 

We have reviewed the record and conclude that Reid’s

sentence is within the advisory guidelines range and well below the

statutory maximum sentence, and thus the district court did not

abuse its discretion in imposing a nine-month term of imprisonment.

The district court’s revocation proceedings otherwise comport with

due process. See 18 U.S.C. § 3583 (2000). Finding no error, we

affirm the judgment of the district court.

This court requires that counsel inform his client, in

writing, of his right to petition the Supreme Court of the United

States for further review. If the client requests that a petition

be filed, but counsel believes that such a petition would be

frivolous, then counsel may move in this court for leave to

withdraw from representation. Counsel’s motion must state that a

copy thereof was served on the client. We dispense with oral

Appeal: 07-4494 Doc: 18 Filed: 12/04/2007 Pg: 2 of 3
- 3 -

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Appeal: 07-4494 Doc: 18 Filed: 12/04/2007 Pg: 3 of 3