Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_10-cv-00869/USCOURTS-caed-2_10-cv-00869-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Michael Martel
Respondent
Raymond Tafoya
Petitioner

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RAYMOND TAFOYA,

Petitioner, No. 2:10-cv-0869 JFM (HC)

vs.

MICHAEL MARTEL, ORDER AND

Respondent. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

By an order filed April 28, 2010, petitioner was ordered to file an in forma

pauperis affidavit or to pay the appropriate filing fee, within thirty days, or his application would

be dismissed. The thirty day period has now expired, and petitioner has not responded to the

court’s order, has not filed an in forma pauperis affidavit, and has not paid the appropriate filing

fee. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court assign a

district judge to this matter; and

IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without

prejudice.

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty

Case 2:10-cv-00869-JAM -JFM Document 6 Filed 06/15/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

days after being served with these findings and recommendations, petitioner may file written

objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge's

Findings and Recommendations.” Petitioner is advised that failure to file objections within the

specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951

F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: June 14, 2010.

/014;tafo0869.fpf.hab

Case 2:10-cv-00869-JAM -JFM Document 6 Filed 06/15/10 Page 2 of 2