Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_14-cv-00599/USCOURTS-caed-1_14-cv-00599-2/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Maria Garcia
Plaintiff
Social Security Administration
Defendant

Document Text:

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

MARIA GARCIA, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

SOCIAL SECURITY 

ADMINISTRATION, 

Defendant. 

Case No. 1:14-cv-00599-SAB 

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE 

FOURTEEN DAY DEADLINE 

 On April 24, 2014, Plaintiff filed the present action in this court seeking review of the 

Commissioner’s denial of an application for benefits. On April 29, 2014, the Court issued a 

scheduling order and on August 20, 2014 an informational order for pro se litigants issued. (ECF 

Nos. 6, 11). The scheduling order states that within 95 days from the filing of the administrative 

record, Plaintiff shall file an opening brief. Further, the informational order for pro se litigants 

informed Plaintiff that if the parties did not agree to remand the case, she was required to file a 

formal brief as directed in the scheduling order. Further, Plaintiff was warned that the failure to 

timely file an opening brief would result in this action being dismissed. (ECF No. 11.) 

 Defendant lodged the Social Security administrative record on December 1, 2014. (ECF 

No. 12.) More than 95 days have passed and Plaintiff has not filed an opening brief nor sought an 

Case 1:14-cv-00599-AWI-SAB Document 13 Filed 03/11/15 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

ex

or

fo

ca

IT

Da

xtension of ti

Accord

rder to show

urteen (14) 

ause shall res

T IS SO ORD

ated: Ma

ime to do so

dingly, IT IS

w cause why

days of the 

sult in this ac

DERED. 

arch 11, 20

. 

S HEREBY 

y this action

date of serv

ction being d

015 

2

ORDERED 

n should no

ice of this o

dismissed fo

U

that Plaintif

ot be dismis

order. Failur

or failure to p

UNITED ST

ff shall file a

ssed for fail

re to comply

prosecute. 

TATES MA

a written res

lure to pros

y with this o

GISTRATE

sponse to thi

secute within

order to show

E JUDGE 

s 

n

w

Case 1:14-cv-00599-AWI-SAB Document 13 Filed 03/11/15 Page 2 of 2