Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_23-cv-02313/USCOURTS-caed-2_23-cv-02313-6/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Dante Renee Budd
Plaintiff
R. Guillermo
Defendant
J. Harrison
Defendant
S. Martinez
Defendant

Document Text:

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

Dante Renee Budd, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

J. Harrison, et al.,

Defendants. 

No. 2:23-cv-02313 KJM CSK P 

ORDER 

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action seeking relief 

under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as provided 

by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 

On February 1, 2024, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which 

were served on plaintiff, and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the 

findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has not filed 

objections to the findings and recommendations. 

The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 

602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed 

de novo. See Robbins v. Carey, 481 F.3d 1143, 1147 (9th Cir. 2007) (“[D]eterminations of law 

by the magistrate judge are reviewed de novo by both the district court and [the appellate] court 

///// 

Case 2:23-cv-02313-KJM-CSK Document 19 Filed 04/03/24 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2 

. . . .”). Having reviewed the file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be 

supported by the record and by the proper analysis. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 

 1. The findings and recommendations (ECF No. 17) are adopted in full; and 

 2. Plaintiff’s Fourth and Fourteenth Amendment claims are dismissed, and this action 

shall proceed solely on plaintiff’s Eighth Amendment claims against defendants J. Harrison, S. 

Martinez, and R. Guillermo. 

DATED: April 3, 2024. 

Case 2:23-cv-02313-KJM-CSK Document 19 Filed 04/03/24 Page 2 of 2