Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_10-cv-01822/USCOURTS-caed-2_10-cv-01822-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Becky Lopez
Plaintiff
M.V. Transportation, Incorporated
Defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

 This case was referred to the undersigned pursuant to Eastern District of California 1

Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BECKY LOPEZ, 

Plaintiff, No. 2:10-cv-01822 GEB KJN PS

v.

M.V. TRANSPORTATION, 

INCORPORATED, 

Defendant. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff, who is proceeding without counsel, filed her complaint on July 14, 2010. 

(Dkt. No. 1.) Presently before the court is plaintiff’s application to proceed without prepayment

of fees, or in forma pauperis. (Dkt. No. 2.) 1

Plaintiff’s application in support of her request to proceed in forma pauperis

makes the showing required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1). (See Dkt. No. 2.) Accordingly, the

undersigned grants plaintiff’s request to proceed in forma pauperis.

The determination that a plaintiff may proceed in forma pauperis does not

complete the required inquiry. The court is also required to screen complaints brought by parties

Case 2:10-cv-01822-GEB-KJN Document 4 Filed 07/16/10 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

proceeding in forma pauperis. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2); see also Calhoun v. Stahl, 254 F.3d

845, 845 (9th Cir. 2001) (per curiam) (“[T]he provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) are not

limited to prisoners.”); accord Lopez v. Smith, 203 F.3d 1122, 1129 (9th Cir. 2000) (en banc). 

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2), the court is directed to dismiss a case filed pursuant to the in

forma pauperis statute if, at any time, it determines that the allegation of poverty is untrue, or if

the action is frivolous or malicious, fails to state a claim on which relief may be granted, or seeks

monetary relief against an immune defendant. See also Lopez, 203 F.3d at 1126-27 (“It is also

clear that section 1915(e) not only permits but requires a district court to dismiss an in forma

pauperis complaint that fails to state a claim.”).

The undersigned cannot conclude on the present record that plaintiff’s action is

frivolous, that her complaint fails to state claims on which relief can be granted, or that she seeks

monetary relief from an immune defendant. The undersigned reserves decision as to plaintiff’s

claims until the record is sufficiently developed, and this order does not preclude defendant from

challenging plaintiff’s complaint through a timely motion pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil

Procedure 12 or other appropriate method of challenging plaintiff’s pleading. Accordingly, the

undersigned will order service of the complaint on defendant M.V. Transportation, Incorporated. 

For the foregoing reasons, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. 

2. Service of plaintiff’s complaint is appropriate for the following defendant:

M.V. Transportation, Incorporated.

3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to issue forthwith all process pursuant to

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4. 

4. The Clerk of Court shall send plaintiff one USM-285 form, one summons,

an endorsed copy of the complaint and plaintiff’s “right to sue” letter filed July 14, 2010 (Dkt.

Nos. 1, 3), this court’s scheduling order, and the forms providing notice of the magistrate judge’s

availability to exercise jurisdiction for all purposes.

Case 2:10-cv-01822-GEB-KJN Document 4 Filed 07/16/10 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

3

5. Plaintiff is advised that to effectuate service, the U.S. Marshal will require:

a. One completed summons;

b. One completed USM-285 form for each defendant to be served; 

c. A copy of the complaint for each defendant to be served, with an

extra copy for the U.S. Marshal; and

d. A copy of this court’s scheduling order and related documents for

each defendant to be served; and

6. Plaintiff shall supply the United States Marshal, within 30 days from the

date this order is filed, all information needed by the Marshal to effectuate service of process, and

shall, within 10 days thereafter, file a statement with the court that such documents have been

submitted to the United States Marshal. 

7. The U.S. Marshal shall serve process, with copies of this court’s

scheduling order and related documents, within 90 days of receipt of the required information

from plaintiff, without prepayment of costs. The United States Marshal shall, within 10 days

thereafter, file a statement with the court that such documents have been served. If the U.S.

Marshal is unable, for any reason, to effect service of process on any defendant, the Marshal shall

promptly report that fact, and the reasons for it, to the undersigned.

8. The Clerk of Court shall serve a copy of this order on the United States

Marshal, 501 “I” Street, Sacramento, CA 95814 (tel. 916-930-2030).

9. Plaintiff’s failure to comply with this order may result in a

recommendation that this action be dismissed.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: July 15, 2010

_____________________________________

KENDALL J. NEWMAN

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:10-cv-01822-GEB-KJN Document 4 Filed 07/16/10 Page 3 of 3