Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_24-cv-01089/USCOURTS-caed-1_24-cv-01089-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Commissioner of Social Security
Defendant
Alison Joy Isbell
Plaintiff

Document Text:

Stip. for Ext.; 1:24-cv-01089-JLT-BAM

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

PHILLIP A. TALBERT

United States Attorney

MATHEW W. PILE, WA BAR #32245

Associate General Counsel

Office of Program Litigation, Office 7

Social Security Administration

FRANCO L. BECIA, WA BAR #26823

Special Assistant United States Attorney

6401 Security Boulevard

Baltimore, MD 21235

Telephone: (206) 615-2114

Fax: (206) 615-2531

Email: Franco.L.Becia@ssa.gov

Attorneys for Defendant

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

(FRESNO)

ALISON JOY ISBELL,

Plaintiff,

vs.

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: 1:24-cv-01089-JLT-BAM

FIRST STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]

ORDER FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME 

Pending the Court’s approval, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the 

parties, through their respective counsel of record, that the time for Defendant to respond to 

Plaintiff’s Complaint be extended from November 12, 2024, up to and including December 12, 

2024. This is the Defendant’s first request for an extension. Defendant requests this extension 

because Defendant has been notified that a certified administrative transcript (CAR) is not yet 

available in this case. Defendant therefore cannot respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint. Once the 

Case 1:24-cv-01089-JLT-BAM Document 11 Filed 11/06/24 Page 1 of 2
Stip. for Ext.; 1:24-cv-01089-JLT-BAM

2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

CAR arrives, Defendant will need to review it for defects before submitting it. For these reasons, 

Defendant asks the Court to approve this unopposed motion and extend the deadline to file a 

response to Plaintiff’s Complaint. Plaintiff does not oppose Defendant’s request for an extension 

of time. The parties further stipulate that the Court’s Scheduling Order shall be modified 

accordingly.

Respectfully submitted,

Dated: November 4, 2024 /s/ Jonathan Omar Pena*

(*as authorized via e-mail)

Jonathan Omar Pena

Attorney for Plaintiff

Dated: November 4, 2024 PHILLIP A. TALBERT

United States Attorney

MATHEW W. PILE

Associate General Counsel

Social Security Administration

By: /s/ Franco L. Becia 

Franco L. Becia

Special Assistant U.S. Attorney

Attorneys for Defendant

ORDER

Pursuant to the parties’ stipulation, and cause appearing, Defendant shall have an 

extension, up to and including December 12, 2024, to respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint. All other 

deadlines in the Court’s Scheduling Order are modified accordingly. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: November 5, 2024 /s/ Barbara A. McAuliffe _

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:24-cv-01089-JLT-BAM Document 11 Filed 11/06/24 Page 2 of 2