Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_16-cv-01411/USCOURTS-caed-1_16-cv-01411-3/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Theresa Brooke
Plaintiff
Hampton Inn & Suites Bakersfield North-Airport
Defendant
Koo Jin Hyun & Chu Myung Hee
Defendant

Document Text:

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

THERESA BROOKE,

 Plaintiff,

v.

H&K PARTNERSHIP, a California 

partnership dba Best Economy Inn & Suites,

Defendant.

____________________________________

THERESA BROOKE,

 Plaintiff,

v.

C & S CHONG INVESTMENT 

CORPORATION, a California corporation 

dba La Quinta Inn Bakersfield North,

Defendant.

____________________________________

THERESA BROOKE,

 Plaintiff,

v.

JDS HOSPITALITY GROUP, LLC, a 

California limited liability company dba 

Days Inn Bakersfield,

Defendant.

Case No.: 1:16-cv-1406-AWI-JLT

ORDER GRANTING 14-DAY EXTENSION OF 

TIME TO RESPOND TO ORDER TO SHOW 

CAUSE

Case No.: 1:16-cv-1407-LJO-JLT

Case No.: 1:16-cv-1408-DAD-JLT

Case 1:16-cv-01411-DAD-JLT Document 8 Filed 10/28/16 Page 1 of 9
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

THERESA BROOKE,

 Plaintiff,

v.

JHP HOSPITALITY GROUP, INC., a 

California corporation dba Ramada Limited 

Bakersfield North,

Defendant.

____________________________________

THERESA BROOKE,

 Plaintiff,

v.

D.P.R.L. INVESTMENTS, LLC, a 

California limited liability company dba 

Hotel Rosedale,

Defendant.

____________________________________

THERESA BROOKE,

 Plaintiff,

v.

KOO JIN HYUN & CHU MYUNG HEE, 

trustees of the KOO JIN HYUN & CHU 

MYUNG HEE TRUST dba Hampton Inn & 

Suites Bakersfield North-Airport,

Defendants.

____________________________________

THERESA BROOKE,

 Plaintiff,

v.

PRIME HOSPITALITY SERVICES, LLC, a 

California limited liability company dba 

Hampton Inn & Suites Bakersfield/Hwy 58,

Defendant.

Case No.: 1:16-cv-1409-AWI-JLT

Case No.: 1:16-cv-1410-LJO-JLT

Case No.: 1:16-cv-1411-DAD-JLT

Case No.: 1:16-cv-1414- LJO-JLT

Case 1:16-cv-01411-DAD-JLT Document 8 Filed 10/28/16 Page 2 of 9
3

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

THERESA BROOKE,

 Plaintiff,

v.

RP GOLDEN STATE MGT, LLC, a 

California limited liability company dba 

Garden Suites Inn,

Defendant.

____________________________________

THERESA BROOKE,

 Plaintiff,

v.

KPK, INC., a California corporation dba 

Travelodge Turlock,

Defendant.

____________________________________

THERESA BROOKE,

 Plaintiff,

v.

LILJENQUIST MODESTO COMPANY, 

LLC, a California limited liability company 

dba Modesto Hotel,

Defendant.

____________________________________

THERESA BROOKE,

 Plaintiff,

v.

METRO HOSPITALITY SERVICES, INC., 

a California corporation dba Hampton Inn 

Fresno NW,

Defendant.

Case No.: 1:16-cv-1415-LJO-JLT

Case No.: 1:16-cv-1449-LJO -JLT

Case No.: 1:16-cv-1454-DAD-JLT

Case No.: 1:16-cv-1455- DAD-JLT

Case 1:16-cv-01411-DAD-JLT Document 8 Filed 10/28/16 Page 3 of 9
4

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

THERESA BROOKE,

 Plaintiff,

v.

JAYESHKUMAR PATEL, an individual; 

PRAFULBHAI PATEL, an individual, both 

individuals dba Budget Inn Modesto,

Defendants.

____________________________________

THERESA BROOKE,

 Plaintiff,

v.

KHATRI BROTHERS, L.P., a California 

limited partnership dba Clarion Modesto,

Defendant.

____________________________________

THERESA BROOKE,

 Plaintiff,

v.

A&A TARZANA PLAZA, LP, a California 

limited partnership dba Hilton Garden Inn 

Clovis,

Defendant.

____________________________________

THERESA BROOKE,

 Plaintiff,

v.

THANDI ENTERPRISES, LLC, a California 

limited liability company dba Holiday Inn 

Express Fresno,

Defendant.

____________________________________

Case No.: 1:16-cv-1456-LJO-JLT

Case No.: 1:16-cv-1465-AWI-JLT

Case No.: 1:16-cv-1499-AWI- JLT

Case No.: 1:16-cv-1503-DAD- JLT

Case 1:16-cv-01411-DAD-JLT Document 8 Filed 10/28/16 Page 4 of 9
5

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

THERESA BROOKE,

 Plaintiff,

v.

FRESNO AIRPORT HOTELS, LLC, a 

California limited liability company dba 

Ramada Fresno Airport,

Defendant.

____________________________________

THERESA BROOKE,

 Plaintiff,

v.

KAINTH BROTHERS, INC., a California 

corporation dba Country Inn Suites Fresno 

North,

Defendant.

____________________________________

THERESA BROOKE,

 Plaintiff,

v.

SHIV HOTELS, LLC, a California limited 

liability company dba Hampton Inn Fresno,

Defendant.

____________________________________

THERESA BROOKE,

 Plaintiff,

v.

SHIVKRUPA INVESTMENTS, INC., a 

California corporation dba La Quinta Inn 

Suites Fresno,

Defendant.

Case No.: 1:16-cv-1506-DAD- JLT

Case No.: 1:16-cv-1508-LJO- JLT

Case No.: 1:16-cv-1509-LJO- JLT

Case No.: 1:16-cv-1510-LJO- JLT

Case 1:16-cv-01411-DAD-JLT Document 8 Filed 10/28/16 Page 5 of 9
6

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

THERESA BROOKE,

 Plaintiff,

v.

SHRIGI, INC., a California corporation dba 

Welcome Inn Fresno,

Defendant.

____________________________________

THERESA BROOKE,

 Plaintiff,

v.

THE DAE SUNG & HEE JAE CHA TRUST 

dba Quality Inn Tulare,

Defendant.

THERESA BROOKE,

 Plaintiff,

v.

HANFORD INVESTORS, INC., a 

California corporation dba Comfort Inn 

Hanford,

Defendant.

____________________________________

THERESA BROOKE,

 Plaintiff,

v.

INTERLINK PROPERTIES L.P., a 

California limited partnership dba Hampton 

Inn Visalia,

Defendant.

Case No.: 1:16-cv-1511-LJO- JLT

Case No.: 1:16-cv-1520-LJO- JLT

Case No.: 1:16-cv-1521-AWI- JLT

Case No.: 1:16-cv-1522-LJO- JLT

Case 1:16-cv-01411-DAD-JLT Document 8 Filed 10/28/16 Page 6 of 9
7

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

THERESA BROOKE,

 Plaintiff,

v.

NMA HOSPITALITY LLC, a California 

limited liability company dba La Quinta 

Tulare,

Defendant.

____________________________________

THERESA BROOKE,

 Plaintiff,

v.

TERRA INVESTMENTS I, LLC, a 

California limited liability company dba 

Charter Inn Suites,

Defendant.

____________________________________

THERESA BROOKE,

 Plaintiff,

v.

PICADILLY INN UNIVERSITY, dba 

University Square Hotel,

Defendant.

____________________________________

THERESA BROOKE,

 Plaintiff,

v.

DAYS INN OF FRESNO PARTNERSHIP, 

dba Days Inn Fresno Central,

Defendant.

Case No.: 1:16-cv-1529-DAD- JLT

Case No.: 1:16-cv-1530-DAD- JLT

Case No.: 1:16-cv-1594-AWI- JLT

Case No.: 1:16-cv-1595-DAD- JLT

Case 1:16-cv-01411-DAD-JLT Document 8 Filed 10/28/16 Page 7 of 9
8

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

The Court has issued an order to show cause based upon what appears to be a lack of standing 

and subject matter jurisdiction. In the order to show cause, the Court observed that the plaintiff admits

to never having visited any of the locations at issue.

The plaintiff has now sought a 14-day extension of time to respond to the order. In part, she 

reports that her attorney is experiencing hardship caused by a medical imperative suffered by his wife; 

this is grounds for the extension of time. However, in larger part, she claims she needs time to now

visit each of the locations in order to establish standing. In doing so, impliedly, the plaintiff admits that 

the claims she made in her complaints—that she intended to visit each of the defendants’ locations due 

to “several upcoming planned visits”—was untrue. Thus, basis is improper and does not support the 

request for the extension of time. Rather her planned tactic when coupled with her earlier allegations 

appears to run afoul of Rule 11(b)(3) [“By presenting to the court a pleading, written motion, or other 

paper--whether by signing, filing, submitting, or later advocating it--an attorney or unrepresented party 

certifies that to the best of the person's knowledge, information, and belief, formed after an inquiry 

reasonable under the circumstances . . . the factual contentions have evidentiary support or, if 

specifically so identified, will likely have evidentiary support after a reasonable opportunity for further 

investigation or discovery.”] Thus, the Court ORDERS:

1. The request for the extension of time to November 23, 2016 is GRANTED;

2. Regardless of whether the plaintiff files amended complaints, plaintiff1and her counsel 

SHALL show cause also why sanctions should not be imposed for making false allegations in the 

 

1

Plaintiff SHALL either explain how her earlier allegations were made in error or she SHALL 

provide evidence to demonstrate that she, indeed, had “upcoming planned visits” to the areas where 

the hotels are located and given these trips, where she stayed or intends to stay instead.

THERESA BROOKE,

 Plaintiff,

v.

PICADILLY INN EXPRESS,

Defendant.

Case No.: 1:16-cv-1596-DAD- JLT

Case 1:16-cv-01411-DAD-JLT Document 8 Filed 10/28/16 Page 8 of 9
9

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

complaints;

3. Regardless of whether the plaintiff files amended complaints, plaintiff SHALL file 

points and authorities that demonstrates that she has stated a claim given the current posture of the 

case—where she had not visited the sites at issue at the time she filed her complaints but then, in an 

attempt to establish standing, purposefully visited the sites despite her “actual knowledge” that they 

failed to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 28, 2016 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:16-cv-01411-DAD-JLT Document 8 Filed 10/28/16 Page 9 of 9