Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-05201/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-05201-3/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Bayani Azucenas
Defendant
M. Forbes
Defendant
Home Depot
Defendant
Mineo
Defendant
Lawrence Reynolds
Plaintiff
Gerald Verbeck
Defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

PROPOSED ORDER RE STIPULATION RE

CONTINUANCE OF CMC

1 C 05-05201 CRB

 

EDWIN J. WILSON, JR., No. 48881

TODD BOLEY, No. 68119

ERICKSON, BEASLEY, HEWITT & WILSON LLP

483 Ninth Street, Suite 200

Oakland, California 94607

Telephone: (510) 839-3448; Fax: (510) 839-1622

Attorneys for Defendants

GERALD VERBECK and DEPUTY MINEO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

IN AND FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LAWRENCE REYNOLDS,

Plaintiff,

v.

GERALD VERBECK, DOES I through V,

individually and as agents for THE CITY OF

DUBLIN, a municipality; M. FORBES, L.V.N.,

and BAYANI AZUCENAS, R.N., employees

of PRISON HEALTH SERVICES, INC., a

corporation and contractor of Alameda County;

DEPUTY MINEO, an employee of Alameda

County; DOES VI through X, individually and

as agents of ALAMEDA COUNTY; and

HOME DEPOT, a foreign corporation,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. C 05-05201 CRB

Date: August 18, 2006

Time: 8:30 a.m.

Dept: Courtroom 8

PROPOSED ORDER RE

STIPULATION RE CONTINUANCE OF

CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

Trial Date: None Set

Judge: Charles R. Breyer

The parties, through their respective counsel have stipulate and jointly requested that the Case

Management Conference scheduled for August 18, 2006 be continued to September 22, 2006, or

such date thereafter as the Court deems appropriate.

The Court has determined that the pending motions scheduled for September 22, 2006 will

have a significant impact in determining what, if any, parties will remain in the action and what

issues will be left to manage. The Court further finds that the parties' efforts to meet and confer

regarding relevant case management issues will be more fruitful after receiving the Court’s guidance

following the rulings on pending motions.

Case 3:05-cv-05201-CRB Document 41 Filed 08/17/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

PROPOSED ORDER RE STIPULATION RE

CONTINUANCE OF CMC

2 C 05-05201 CRB

 

Good cause appearing therefore, the Court grants the parties request to continue the

August 18, 2006 case management conference and the case management conference is continued to

_________________________, 2006, to allow the parties to meet and confer and to file an updated

Joint Case Management Conference addressing the issues remaining in the case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated:______________________

Judge of the District Court

Q:\Alameda County\Reynolds 1457\Pld\Order.Continuing.CMC.wpd

September 22, at 10:00 a.m. August 17, 2006

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Charles R. Breyer

Case 3:05-cv-05201-CRB Document 41 Filed 08/17/06 Page 2 of 2