Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-01870/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-01870-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Felker
Defendant
Earl Dwayne Smith
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

EARL DWAYNE SMITH, 

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-06-1870 GEB EFB P

vs.

FELKER,

Defendant. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

Plaintiff is a prisoner without counsel seeking relief for alleged civil rights violations. 

See 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On November 15, 2006, the court dismissed plaintiff’s complaint for

failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted, explained the complaint’s

deficiencies, gave plaintiff 30 days to file an amended complaint correcting those deficiencies,

and warned plaintiff that failure to file an amended complaint would result in a recommendation

that this action be dismissed.

The 30-day period has expired and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint.

Accordingly, it is hereby RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed for failure to

state a claim upon which relief could be granted. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A; 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty days 

Case 2:06-cv-01870-GEB-EFB Document 12 Filed 01/09/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written

objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned 

“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Failure to file objections

within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Turner v.

Duncan, 158 F.3d 449, 455 (9th Cir. 1998); Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

Dated: January 8, 2007.

Case 2:06-cv-01870-GEB-EFB Document 12 Filed 01/09/07 Page 2 of 2