Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_10-cv-01926/USCOURTS-cand-3_10-cv-01926-3/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Jose Amaya
Plaintiff
GMAC Mortgage Corporation
Defendant
GMAC Mortgage, LLC
Defendant
Maria Elena Montano
Plaintiff

Document Text:

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOSE AMAYA AND MARIA ELENA

MONTANO

Plaintiffs,

 v.

GMAC MORTGAGE, LLC, F/K/A GMAC

MORTGAGE CORPORATION,

Defendant. /

No. C 10-01926 WHA

ORDER DISMISSING CASE

Plaintiffs, proceeding pro se, filed claims in this action relating to a mortgage loan that

they obtained. Defendant GMAC filed a motion to dismiss but plaintiffs did not file a timely

opposition. Because plaintiffs are proceeding pro se, they were given additional time and the

deadline to file their opposition was extended by two weeks. The order warned that “[i]f

plaintiffs again fail to file a timely opposition, this matter will likely be dismissed for lack of

prosecution” (Dkt. No. 13). Yet again, the deadline has passed and plaintiffs have not provided

a response.

As described, plaintiffs have repeatedly failed to respond in a timely fashion. Due to 

Case 3:10-cv-01926-WHA Document 14 Filed 08/03/10 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

their failure to prosecute, this action will be DISMISSED WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND. 

Judgment shall be entered.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 3, 2010. WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:10-cv-01926-WHA Document 14 Filed 08/03/10 Page 2 of 2