Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_10-cv-00031/USCOURTS-caed-2_10-cv-00031-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Larry D. Edwards
Petitioner
Gary Swarthout
Respondent

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LARRY D. EDWARDS,

Petitioner, No. CIV S-10-0031 DAD P

vs.

GARY SWARTHOUT, ORDER AND

Respondent. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

By an order filed March 1, 2010, petitioner was granted an extension of time and

ordered to file an application requesting leave to proceed in forma pauperis within thirty days. 

Petitioner was previously advised that his failure to comply with the court’s order would result in

the dismissal of this action. The thirty day period has now expired, and petitioner has not

responded to the court’s order and has not filed an in forma pauperis affidavit. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this case be randomly assigned to a

District Judge.

Also, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without

prejudice.

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twentyCase 2:10-cv-00031-GEB-DAD Document 8 Filed 04/13/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

one days after being served with these findings and recommendations, petitioner may file written

objections with the court. Such a document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate

Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Petitioner is advised that failure to file objections

within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v.

Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: April 12, 2010.

DAD:4

edwa0031.fifp

Case 2:10-cv-00031-GEB-DAD Document 8 Filed 04/13/10 Page 2 of 2