Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-arwd-1_04-cv-01086/USCOURTS-arwd-1_04-cv-01086-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Frank Chancellor
Plaintiff
Potlatch Corporation
Defendant

Document Text:

-1-

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS

EL DORADO DIVISION

FRANK CHANCELLOR PLAINTIFF

 

VS. Case No. 04-CV-1086

POTLATCH CORPORATION DEFENDANT

ORDER

Before the Court is Potlatch’s First Motion for Summary Judgment. (Doc. 8). 

Chancellor has responded. (Doc 16). Potlatch has also filed a Reply and a Motion to Strike. 

(Doc. 19). Chancellor has responded to Potlatch’s Motion to Strike. (Doc.20) Upon

consideration, for the reasons discussed in the Memorandum Opinion of even date, the Court

finds Defendant’s Motion to Strike should be denied. Defendant’s Motion for Summary

Judgment should be and hereby is granted in part and denied in part. Plaintiff’s ADA/ACRA

and FMLA claims are hereby dismissed with prejudice. The remainder of Defendant’s Motion

for Summary Judgment is denied.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 8th day of November, 2005.

 /s/ Harry F. Barnes 

Hon. Harry F. Barnes

U.S. District Judge

Case 1:04-cv-01086-HFB Document 24 Filed 11/08/05 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: <pageID>