Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_15-mc-80100/USCOURTS-cand-4_15-mc-80100-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Jerome L. Grimes
Plaintiff
Diana Starnes
Defendant

Document Text:

United States District Court 

For the Northern District of California 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

JEROME L. GRIMES, 

 

 Plaintiff, 

 

 v. 

AMY (DOE), et al., 

 Defendants. 

________________________________/ 

No. C 15-80107M CW 

ORDER RETURNING 

COMPLAINTS TO 

PLAINTIFF 

JEROME L. GRIMES, 

 

 Plaintiff, 

 

 v. 

DIANA STARNES, aka DIANA GRIMESSTARNES, 

 Defendant. 

________________________________/ 

No. C 15-80100M CW 

JEROME L. GRIMES, 

 

 Plaintiff, 

 

 v. 

CHRISTOPHER “CHRIS” SHULTZ, et 

al. 

 Defendant. 

________________________________/ 

No. C 15-80099M CW 

On December 9, 2005, this Court entered a pre-filing order 

regarding the cases filed by Plaintiff Jerome Grimes. The prefiling order states that if Mr. Grimes files a complaint that is 

“related to any of the following matters: 

(1) a diversified group of individuals who commit acts 

of terror against Mr. Grimes, his family and other 

citizens; 

Case 4:15-mc-80100-CW Document 2 Filed 04/09/15 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court 

For the Northern District of California 

 2 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

(2) an injunction against the defendants to prevent them 

from kidnaping, framing, falsely imprisoning or 

otherwise terrorizing Mr. Grimes, his family, and other 

citizens; 

(3) a court order for the defendants to be subjected to 

a lie detector test; 

(4) covert terrorism 

it will not be filed unless it presents cognizable claims that are 

not based on merely conclusory allegations. Second, no other 

complaints filed by Mr. Grimes while he is not incarcerated or 

detained will be filed unless they contain intelligible factual 

allegations and claims for relief.” 

The Court has reviewed the above-captioned complaints filed 

by Mr. Grimes and finds that they shall not be filed because they 

allege that Defendants are engaged in terrorism. Mr. Grimes 

alleges no cognizable causes of action in these complaints. 

Because the above-captioned complaints concern matters 

mentioned in the pre-filing order and present no cognizable cause 

of action, the Clerk of the Court is ordered not to file them. 

Instead, the complaints shall be returned to Mr. Grimes. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: 04/09/2015 CLAUDIA WILKEN 

United States District Judge 

Case 4:15-mc-80100-CW Document 2 Filed 04/09/15 Page 2 of 2