Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca10-16-01473/USCOURTS-ca10-16-01473-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
John E. Breen
Appellee
William Carter
Appellant
Ben Gunn
Not Party
Jennifer Gunn
Not Party
WCA Logistics II, LLC
Appellant
WCA Logistics, LLC
Appellant

Document Text:

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

_________________________________

BEN GUNN, JENNIFER GUNN,

 Plaintiffs Counterclaim Defendants –

 Appellants/Cross-Appellees,

v.

WCA LOGISTICS, LLC, WCA 

LOGISTICS II, LLC, WILLIAM 

CARTER, 

 Defendants Counterclaimants Third-

 Party Plaintiffs Counterclaim 

 Defendants- Appellees/Cross-

 Appellants,

and

JOHN E. BREEN, 

 Third-Party Defendant 

 Counterclaimant - Appellee/Cross-

 Appellant/Cross-Appellee.

Nos. 16-1458, 16-1461, 16-1472

& 16-1473

(D.C. No. 1:13-CV-02197-WJM-MEH)

(D. Colo.)

_________________________________

ORDER

_________________________________

These matters are before the court on the Stipulated Motion to Dismiss filed by all 

the parties to these appeals on December 21, 2016. On the same day the motion was filed, 

we issued an order taking the request under advisement pending Mr. John Breen’s 

payment of the $505 filing fee in number 16-1461. The deadline to pay that fee was 

January 3, 2017. To date no payment has been made.

FILED

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

January 4, 2017

Elisabeth A. Shumaker

Clerk of Court

Appellate Case: 16-1473 Document: 01019744675 Date Filed: 01/04/2017 Page: 1 
2

Consequently, and upon consideration, the motion to dismiss is construed

specifically as a voluntary request under Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 42(b). **

As construed, the motion is granted in appeal numbers 16-1458, 16-1472, and 16-1473. 

The motion is denied in appeal number 16-1461.

Appeal number 16-1461 is, instead, dismissed for failure to prosecute. See 10th

Cir. R. 42.1 and 3.3(B)(1). 

A copy of this order shall stand as and for the mandate in each of these appeals. 

Entered for the Court

ELISABETH A. SHUMAKER, Clerk

 ** In this regard, we note Rule 42(b) does not speak to dismissal “with prejudice.” 

Appellate Case: 16-1473 Document: 01019744675 Date Filed: 01/04/2017 Page: 2