Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-00165/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-00165-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Maida L. Enabnit
Plaintiff
Petsmart, Inc.
Defendant

Document Text:

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE THE HEARING ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION 

TO QUASH PLAINTIFF’S SUBPOENA TO ADP, INC. 

1-LA/943616.1 

MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP 

REBECCA EISEN, State Bar No. 096129 

One Market, Spear Street Tower 

San Francisco, CA 94105-1126 

Tel: 415.442.1000 

Fax: 415.442.1001 

reisen@morganlewis.com 

MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP 

JILL PORCARO, State Bar No. 190412 

BENJAMIN DAVIDSON, State Bar No. 241859 

300 South Grand Avenue, 22nd Floor 

Los Angeles, CA 90071-3132 

Tel: 213.612-2500 

Fax: 213.612-250 

jporcaro@morganlewis.com 

Attorneys for Defendant 

PetSmart, Inc. 

MARK R. THIERMAN, State Bar No. 72913 

THIERMAN LAW FIRM 

7287 Lakeside Drive 

Reno, NV 89511 

Tel: 775.284-1500 

Fax: 775.703-5027 

laborlawyer@pacbell.net 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

Maida L. Enabnit 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

MAIDA L. ENABNIT, on behalf of 

herself, all others similarly situated, the 

general public and as an “aggrieved 

employee” under the California Labor 

Code Private Attorneys General Act, 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

PETSMART, INC., a Delaware 

Corporation; and DOES 1-50, inclusive, 

Defendant. 

Case No. 2:07-CV-00165-RRB-DAD 

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO 

CONTINUE THE HEARING ON 

DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO QUASH 

PLAINTIFF MAIDA L. ENABNIT’S 

SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM TO 

NONPARTY ADP, INC. AND REQUEST 

FOR SANCTIONS 

Case 2:07-cv-00165-JAM -DAD Document 23 Filed 06/18/07 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE THE HEARING ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION 

TO QUASH PLAINTIFF’S SUBPOENA TO ADP, INC. 

1-LA/943616.1 2 

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the parties herein, as 

follows: 

 The parties, by and through their attorneys of record, hereby stipulate to move the hearing 

date on Defendant’s Motion to Quash Plaintiff’s Subpoena Duces Tecum to Nonparty ADP, Inc. 

and Request for Sanctions, which is currently scheduled for 10:00 a.m. on June 29, 2007, to July 

13, 2007 at 10:00 a.m. 

 The parties further stipulate that the opposition date of June 15, 2007 and the reply date of 

June 22, 2007 will remain the same. 

 Good cause exists to extend the hearing on Defendant’s Motion to Quash Plaintiff’s 

Subpoena to ADP, Inc. because counsel for Plaintiff, Mark R. Thierman, will be out of town on a 

pre-paid vacation from June 28, 2007 through July 7, 2007. 

 The parties respectfully request that the Court enter an Order moving the hearing date 

from 10:00 a.m. on June 29, 2007 to 10:00 a.m. on July 13, 2007. 

Dated: June 12, 2007 MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP 

By /s/Jill A. Porcaro 

Jill A. Porcaro 

Attorneys for Defendant 

Dated: June 12, 2007 THIERMAN LAW FIRM 

By /s/Mark R. Thierman 

Mark T. Thierman 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: June 18, 2007. 

Ddad1/orders.civil/enabnit0165.stipord

Case 2:07-cv-00165-JAM -DAD Document 23 Filed 06/18/07 Page 2 of 2