Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_16-cv-01516/USCOURTS-caed-2_16-cv-01516-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Target Corporation
Defendant
Salvador Tinoco
Plaintiff

Document Text:

LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.

333 Bush Street

34th Floor

San Francisco, CA 94104

415.433.1940

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Firmwide:144382099.1 052067.1538 Case No. 2:16-cv-01516-WHO

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE VOLUNTARY DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROGRAM

MICHELLE R. BARRETT, Bar No. 197280

LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.

333 Bush Street

34th Floor

San Francisco, CA 94104

Telephone: 415.433.1940

Fax No.: 415.399.8490

BARBARA A. BLACKBURN, Bar No. 253731

LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.

500 Capitol Mall

Suite 2000

Sacramento, CA 95814

Telephone: 916.830.7200

Fax No.: 916.561.0828

Attorneys for Defendant

TARGET CORPORATION

MICHAEL J. TREZZA, Bar No. 142922

LAW OFFICE OF MICHAEL J. TREZZA

506 Second Street

Yuba City, CA 95991

Telephone: (530) 673-5637 

Fax No.: (530) 673-0277

Attorney For Plaintiff

SALVADOR TINOCO

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SALVADOR TINOCO,

Plaintiff,

v.

TARGET CORPORATION, AND DOES 

1 THROUGH 10,

Defendant.

Case No. 2:16-cv-01516-WHO

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

RE VOLUNTARY DISPUTE RESOLUTION 

PROGRAM

Judge: William H. Orrick III

Case 2:16-cv-01516-WHO Document 11 Filed 12/13/16 Page 1 of 2
LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.

333 Bush Street

34th Floor

San Francisco, CA 94104

415.433.1940

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Firmwide:144382099.1 052067.1538 2.

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE VOLUNTARY DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROGRAM

Pursuant to Local Rule 271(i), Defendant TARGET CORPORATION (“Defendant”) 

and Plaintiff SALVADOR TINOCO (“Plaintiff”) hereby stipulate as follows: 

The parties agree to participate in the Court’s Voluntary Dispute Resolution Program 

(“VDRP”). The parties propose that the VDRP process be completed by the end of March 2017, and 

that the Neutral shall file confirmation of completion in early April 2017. 

The parties do not anticipate needing any modifications or additions to the Scheduling 

Order, and will meet and confer to determine if any discovery needs to be completed prior to 

completion of the VDRP.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Dated: December 9, 2016

/s/ Michael J. Trezza (authorized on 12/08/16)

MICHAEL J. TREZZA

LAW OFFICE OF MICHAEL J. TREZZA

Attorneys for Plaintiff

SALVADOR TINOCO

Dated: December 9, 2016

/s/ Barbara A. Blackburn

MICHELLE R. BARRETT

BARBARA A. BLACKBURN

LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.

Attorneys for Defendant

TARGET CORPORATION

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: __12/12/2016_______, 2016 _____________________________________________

WILLIAM H. ORRICK III

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

Case 2:16-cv-01516-WHO Document 11 Filed 12/13/16 Page 2 of 2