Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-03693/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-03693-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Raul Escarcega
Petitioner
A. P. Kane
Respondent

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RAUL ESCARCEGA,

Petitioner,

v.

A. P. KANE, warden,

Respondent. /

No. C 06-3693 SI (pr)

ORDER

Respondent's motion to dismiss the action based on petitioner's failure to pay the filing

fee is DENIED as moot. (Docket # 6.) Although it was very tardy, the filing fee eventually

was paid on February 27, 2007. 

In light of the denial of the motion to dismiss, the court replaces the briefing schedule

in the order to show cause with the following new briefing schedule for this habeas action:

1. Respondent must file and serve his answer to the petition on or before April 6,

2007. 

2. If petitioner wishes to respond to the answer, he must do so by filing a traverse

with the court and serving it on respondent on or before May 18, 2007.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: February 28, 2007 

 SUSAN ILLSTON

United States District Judge

Case 3:06-cv-03693-SI Document 9 Filed 02/28/07 Page 1 of 1