Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-04768/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-04768-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Correctional Training Facility
Defendant
David W. Kohler
Plaintiff

Document Text:

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DAVID W. KOHLER,

Plaintiff,

 v.

CORRECTIONAL TRAINING FACILITY,

Defendant. ____________________________________ 

 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. C 06-4768 MMC (PR) 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

Plaintiff, a California prisoner proceeding pro se, filed the above-titled civil rights

action on July 19, 2006 in the Eastern District of California. On July 27, 2006, the case was

transferred to this court. On January 2, 2007, the Clerk notified plaintiff in writing that the

action was deficient due to his failure to pay the requisite filing fee or, instead, submit a

court-approved in forma pauperis ("IFP") application. In said notice, plaintiff was advised

that his failure to pay the filing fee or, alternatively, to file a completed IFP application,

including a trust account statement showing transactions for the preceding six months and a

certificate of funds form signed by an institution official, within thirty days, would result in

dismissal of the action. Along with said notice, plaintiff was sent a copy of the Court’s IFP

application, instructions for completing it, and a return envelope. To date, plaintiff has

neither paid the filing fee nor submitted a completed IFP application.

Case 3:06-cv-04768-MMC Document 4 Filed 03/29/07 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

As more than thirty days have passed since the deficiency notice and plaintiff has not

paid the filing fee or filed a completed IFP application, the above-titled action is hereby

DISMISSED without prejudice. 

The Clerk shall close the file. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: March 29, 2007 

MAXINE M. CHESNEY

United States District Judge

Case 3:06-cv-04768-MMC Document 4 Filed 03/29/07 Page 2 of 2