Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-01593/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-01593-2/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
People of the State of California
Respondent
Douglas Sharron Piggee
Petitioner

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DOUGLAS SHARRON PIGGEE,

Petitioner, No. CIV S-06-1593 DFL KJM P

vs.

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF

CALIFORNIA, 

Respondent. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

By an order filed July 27, 2006, petitioner was ordered to file an application to

proceed in forma pauperis or pay the filing fee within thirty days and was cautioned that failure

to do so would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. The thirty day period

has now expired, and petitioner has not filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis or paid

the filing fee. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed

without prejudice.

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty

days after being served with these findings and recommendations, petitioner may file written

objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s

Findings and Recommendations.” Petitioner is advised that failure to file objections within the

Case 2:06-cv-01593-JKS-KJM Document 11 Filed 11/08/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951

F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: November 7, 2006.

1

pigg1593.fff

Case 2:06-cv-01593-JKS-KJM Document 11 Filed 11/08/06 Page 2 of 2