Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-00780/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-00780-14/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
$209,815 in United States Currency
Defendant
Julio Figueroa
Claimant
United States of America
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United 

States District 

Court 

For the Northern District of California 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

$209,815 IN UNITED STATES 

CURRENCY, 

 Defendant. 

__________________________________ 

JULIO FIGUEROA, 

 Claimant. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 3:14-cv-00780 

ORDER TO REVISE FILING 

The Court requested or otherwise permitted further responsive 

pleadings in the above captioned case. See Order of the Court 

dated July 28, 2015, ECF No. 132 ("Surreply Order"). The Court is 

in now receipt thereof. See ECF Nos. 133 ("Surreply"), 137 

("Surreply Opp'n"). 

In the Surreply Order, the Court acknowledged that the United 

States expressly objected to the length of Claimant's originally 

proposed Surreply and accordingly limited Claimant's Surreply to 

five (5) pages, per Civil Local Rule 7-3(d)(1). See Surreply Order 

Case 3:14-cv-00780-MMC Document 138 Filed 08/19/15 Page 1 of 2
2 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United 

States District 

Court

For the Northern District of California 

at 2-3. Claimant substantially complied. See generally Surreply 

(spanning 5 pages of text). The Court was therefore highly 

displeased to see the United States file an opposition to the 

Surreply that exceeded five pages. See generally Surreply Opp'n 

(spanning 8 pages of text). The Court was confident its earlier 

order was sufficiently clear. Apparently not. 

The Court will not limit one side without similarly limiting 

the other absent proper legal justification. Finding no such 

justification here, the Court hereby ORDERS the United States to 

revise its Surreply Opp'n to not more than five (5) pages of text 

within three (3) days of the date of this order. Failure to file a 

revised edition will result in the Court striking from the Surreply 

Opp'n any text following the end of the fifth page. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: August 19, 2015 

 United States District Judge 

Case 3:14-cv-00780-MMC Document 138 Filed 08/19/15 Page 2 of 2