Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_08-cv-01108/USCOURTS-azd-2_08-cv-01108-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Gabriel Rico-Bustamante
Plaintiff
United States of America
Defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

United States of America,

Plaintiff/Respondent,

vs.

Gabriel Rico-Bustamante, 

Defendant/Movant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CR 07-0611-PHX-MHM

 CV 08-1108-PHX-MHM

ORDER

Gabriel Rico-Bustamante filed a Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 on June 12, 2008. Respondent filed its response on August 11,

2008. Movant filed his reply on September 18, 2008. 

The Magistrate Judge filed his Report and Recommendation on September 10, 2010

recommending that Movant's Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence be denied.

In his Report and Recommendation the Magistrate Judge advised the parties that they

had 14 days from the date of service of a copy of the Report and Recommendation within

which to file specific written objections with the Court. The time to file such objections has

long since expired and no objections to the Report and Recommendation have been filed.

Failure to timely file objections to any factual or legal determination of the Magistrate Judge

may be considered a waiver of a party’s right to de novo consideration of the issues. See

United States v. Reyna-Tapia 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc).

Case 2:08-cv-01108-MHM Document 7 Filed 12/29/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

After a complete and independent review of the issues presented, the Court finds itself

in agreement with the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.

IT IS ORDERED adopting the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge

as the order of this Court (Doc. 5). 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Movant's Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct

Sentence is denied (Doc. 31). 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a Certificate of Appealablity and leave to proceed

in forma pauperis on appeal is denied because dismissal of the Petition is justified by a plain

procedural bar and jurists of reason would not find the ruling debatable. 

DATED this 28th day of December, 2010.

Case 2:08-cv-01108-MHM Document 7 Filed 12/29/10 Page 2 of 2