Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_09-cv-00269/USCOURTS-caed-1_09-cv-00269-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Neil H. Adler
Respondent
Mario Villegas
Petitioner

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

U.S. District Court

 E. D. California -1-

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MARIO VILLEGAS, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

v. )

)

)

NEIL H. ADLER, )

)

Respondent. )

 )

1:09-CV-00269 MJS HC

ORDER TO REPORT CURRENT

ADDRESS

Petitioner is a prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241.

This action has been pending before this Court since February 12, 2009. Given the

amount of time that has since passed and the Court’s need to maintain current information as

to Petitioner’s address, the Court requests that Petitioner provide information regarding his

current location and mailing address.

Pursuant to Local Rule 183(b), a party appearing in propria persona is required to keep

the court apprised of his or her current address at all times. Local Rule 183(b) provides, in

pertinent part:

If mail directed to a plaintiff in propria persona by the Clerk is

Case 1:09-cv-00269-MJS Document 15 Filed 08/05/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

U.S. District Court

 E. D. California -2-

returned by the U.S. Postal Service, and if such plaintiff fails to

notify the Court and opposing parties within sixty-three (63) days

thereafter of a current address, the Court may dismiss the action

without prejudice for failure to prosecute.

Without the ability to communicate with Petitioner, the Court is unable to maintain and

faithfully adjudicate the matter.

ORDER

Accordingly, Petitioner is ORDERED to inform the Court and any opposing counsel of

his current address within sixty-three (63) days after service of this order. 

Failure to follow this order may result in dismissal of the petition without prejudice

pursuant to Local Rules 110 and 183(b).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 4, 2010 /s/Michael J. Seng 

ci4d6 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:09-cv-00269-MJS Document 15 Filed 08/05/10 Page 2 of 2