Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-00584/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-00584-7/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
City and County of San Francisco
Defendant
Eithine Cummins
Defendant
Joshua Esponoza
Defendant
Phillip Frenkel
Defendant
James Edward Holmes
Plaintiff
Parmijit Kaur
Defendant
Ken Kikuchi
Defendant
Ralph Kuger
Defendant
Erik Leung
Defendant
San Francisco Police Department
Defendant
Eric Valentine
Defendant

Document Text:

Stipulation and Order re Partial Dismissal

Holmes v. CCSF, et al.; Case No. 14-cv-0584 NC

1 c:\users\harrelll\appdata\local\temp\2\notes8317b7\01054395.doc

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DENNIS J. HERRERA, State Bar #139669

City Attorney

CHERYL ADAMS, State Bar #164194

Chief Trial Deputy

BRIAN P. CEBALLO, State Bar #243828

Deputy City Attorney

Fox Plaza

1390 Market Street, 6th Floor

San Francisco, California 94102-5408

Telephone: (415) 554-3911

Facsimile: (415) 554-3837

E-Mail: brian.ceballo@sfgov.org

Attorneys for Defendants

CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO

(ERRONEOUSLY SUED AS SAN FRANCISCO POLICE 

DEPARTMENT), JOSHUA ESPINOZA, 

PHILLIP FRENKEL, PARAMJIT KAUR

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JAMES EDWARD HOLMES,

Plaintiff,

vs.

SAN FRANCISCO POLICE DEPARTMENT, 

JOSHUA ESPONOZA, EITHINE 

CUMMINS, RALPH KUGER, KEN 

KIKUCHI, ERIK LEUNG, PHILLIP 

FRENKEL, PARMIJIT KAUR, ERIC 

VALENTINE and DOES 1-50,

Defendants.

Case No. C14-0584 NC

STIPULATION FOR PARTIAL DISMISSAL; 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

Trial Date: February 8, 2016

TO THE CLERK OF THE ABOVE-ENTITLED COURT:

Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), the parties stipulate to the entry of an 

order dismissing with prejudice this action against defendants City and County of San Francisco 

(erroneously sued as San Francisco Police Department) and Paramjit Kaur. 

Further, the parties stipulate to the dismissal of racial profiling and unlawful detention causes 

of action in Count I (paragraph 19) of plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) (Docket “Dkt.” 

Case 3:14-cv-00584-NC Document 96 Filed 10/22/15 Page 1 of 2
Stipulation and Order re Partial Dismissal

Holmes v. CCSF, et al.; Case No. 14-cv-0584 NC

2 c:\users\harrelll\appdata\local\temp\2\notes8317b7\01054395.doc

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

13) against defendants Joshua Espinoza and Phillip Frenkel, and dismissing the cause of action against 

the defendant City and County of San Francisco (erroneously sued as San Francisco Police 

Department) in Count II (paragraph 20) of plaintiff’s FAC (Dkt. 13). 

Dated: October 22, 2015

DENNIS J. HERRERA

City Attorney

CHERYL ADAMS

Chief Trial Deputy

BRIAN P. CEBALLO

Deputy City Attorney

By:

BRIAN P. CEBALLO

Attorneys for Defendants

CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, ET. AL.

Dated: October 22, 2015 LAW OFFICES OF STANLEY GOFF

By: /s/ Stanley Goff

STANLEY GOFF

Attorneys for Plaintiff

JAMES EDWARD HOLMES

ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 22, 2015 

NATHANAEL COUSINS

United States District Court Magistrate Judge

Case 3:14-cv-00584-NC Document 96 Filed 10/22/15 Page 2 of 2