Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-02256/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-02256-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Norman Hubbs
Plaintiff
Steven Mayberg
Defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

NORMAN HUBBS,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-2256 GEB DAD P

vs.

STEVEN MAYBERG,

Defendant. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

A recent court order was served on plaintiff at his address of record and was

returned by the postal service marked undeliverable as addressed and unable to forward. It

appears that plaintiff has failed to comply with Local Rule 83-182(f), which requires that each

party appearing in propria persona is under a continuing duty to notify the court and all other

parties of any change of address.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed for

plaintiff’s failure to keep the court apprised of his current address. See Local Rules 83-182(f)

and 11-110.

These findings and recommendations will be submitted to the United States

District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within

fifteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file

Case 2:04-cv-02256-GEB-DAD Document 22 Filed 07/29/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

written objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate

Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections

within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. See Martinez

v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: July 28, 2005.

DAD:13

hubb2256.33a

Case 2:04-cv-02256-GEB-DAD Document 22 Filed 07/29/05 Page 2 of 2