Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-16-06647/USCOURTS-ca4-16-06647-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Todd C
Appellee
Kristi Crites
Appellee
Vanmeter Denise
Appellee
David A. Gambino
Appellant
Tom Gera
Appellee
Carrie Hanscom
Appellee
Amerzua Jody
Appellee
Carol Miller
Appellee
Dr. Moubarek
Appellee
Boch P.
Appellee
Blaine Smith
Appellee
Warden Stewart
Appellee
Mcgahee Tequila
Appellee

Document Text:

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-6647

DAVID A. GAMBINO,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

DR. MOUBAREK, MD; CAROL MILLER, HIT; KRISTI CRITES, CRNP; 

TOM GERA, RN; TODD C, PA-C; AMERZUA JODY, L.RN; BOCH P., RN;

VANMETER DENISE, RN; WARDEN STEWART, Warden; MCGAHEE 

TEQUILA, DMD; BLAINE SMITH, MD; CARRIE HANSCOM, Director of 

Radiology,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

Maryland, at Greenbelt. Theodore D. Chuang, District Judge. 

(8:15-cv-02202-TDC)

Submitted: February 22, 2017 Decided: March 6, 2017

Before NIEMEYER and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed as modified by unpublished per curiam opinion.

David A. Gambino, Appellant Pro Se. Jane Elizabeth Andersen, 

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland; 

Christopher Ryan Daily, BRADY, FISCHEL & DAILY, LLC, Annapolis, 

Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 16-6647 Doc: 27 Filed: 03/06/2017 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM: 

David A. Gambino appeals the district court’s order

dismissing his complaint for failure to exhaust administrative 

remedies. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible 

error. Although we agree that Gambino failed to exhaust his 

claims and dismissal is mandatory, the dismissal should have 

been without prejudice to his right to refile should exhaustion 

become complete. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the 

district court as modified to reflect dismissal without 

prejudice. Gambino v. Moubarek, No. 8:15-cv-02202-TDC (D. Md. 

Apr. 22, 2016). We deny Gambino’s motions for injunctive 

relief, for a continuance, and to supplement the appeal with new 

evidence. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED

Appeal: 16-6647 Doc: 27 Filed: 03/06/2017 Pg: 2 of 2