Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-02687/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-02687-2/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Feather River Community College
Defendant
Michelle Jaureguito
Plaintiff

Document Text:

B

E

S

S

O

N

T

E

R

H

O

R

S

T LLP

510 BERCUT DRIVE, SUITE V 

SCACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA 95811 

 (916) 444-4300 TELEPHONE 

(916) 444-4321 FACSIMILE

-1- 

STIPULATED MOTION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF PRE-TRIAL AND TRIAL DEADLINES 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

JEFFREY E. BEESON / SBN 200897 

MICHAEL A. TERHORST / SBN 164679 

BEESON TERHORST LLP 

510 Bercut Drive, Suite V 

Sacramento, California 95811-0111 

Telephone: (916) 444-3400 

Facsimile: (916) 444-3421 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

MICHELLE JAUREGUITO 

ROBERT H. JOHNSON / SBN 48067 

JOHNSON, SCHACHTER & LEWIS 

2180 Harvard Street, Suite 560 

Sacramento, California 95815 

Telephone: (916) 921-5800 

Facsimile: (916) 921-0247 

Attorneys for Defendant 

FEATHER RIVER COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT 

(sued herein as FEATHER RIVER COMMUNITY COLLEGE) 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

MICHELLE JAUREGUITO, 

 Plaintiff. 

 v. 

FEATHER RIVER COMMUNITY COLLEGE, 

 Defendant. 

_______________________________________ 

 CASE NO.: 2:06-CV-02687-FCD-GGH 

STIPULATED MOTION AND ORDER 

FOR EXTENSION OF PRE-TRIAL AND 

TRIAL DEADLINES 

 

“AS MODIFIED”

Plaintiff MICHELLE JAUREGUITO and Defendant FEATHER RIVER COMMUNITY 

COLLEGE DISTRICT (hereinafter “FRC”) (sued herein as FEATHER RIVER COMMUNITY 

COLLEGE) submit the following STIPULATED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF PRE-TRIAL 

AND TRIAL DEADLINES (“Motion”): 

By this Motion, Plaintiff Michelle Jaureguito and Defendant Feather River Community 

College District (referred to collectively as the “Parties”) seek to modify the pre-trial scheduling 

order to extend the period for discovery, all other pre-trial deadlines and trial date in this matter, 

Case 2:06-cv-02687-KJM-GGH Document 18 Filed 09/21/07 Page 1 of 3
B

E

S

S

O

N

T

E

R

H

O

R

S

T LLP

510 BERCUT DRIVE, SUITE V 

SCACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA 95811 

 (916) 444-4300 TELEPHONE 

(916) 444-4321 FACSIMILE

-2- 

STIPULATED MOTION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF PRE-TRIAL AND TRIAL DEADLINES 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

currently set per the Court’s March 12, 2007 Order. 

The Parties have engaged in extensive discovery and have mediation scheduled for October 

1, 2007 in this and other related cases. The Parties therefore seek to extend the current pre-trial 

deadlines so that they may complete discovery in the event that this matter does not settle at that 

time. The Parties request that all dates be extended approximately three or four months for the 

pretrial and trial deadlines, respectively. 

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16(b) provides that a pretrial order may be modified, “upon 

a showing of good cause.” This Court may modify a pretrial scheduling order if “it cannot 

reasonably be met despite the diligence of the party seeking the extension.” Johnson v. Mammoth 

Recreations, Inc., 975 F.2d. 604, 609 (9th Cir. 1992) (quoting Fed. R. Civ. P. 16, advisory 

committee’s notes (1983 amendment)). The “good cause” inquiry focuses primarily on the 

“diligence of the party seeking the amendment.” Id. 

Here, the Parties have diligently participated in discovery, but are unable to meet the 

scheduling deadlines and will focus their efforts on a successful mediation. Therefore, good cause 

exists for an extension of the pre-trial deadlines in this matter. 

The Parties stipulate to the following proposed pre-trial dates and trial date: 

Discovery Closes: November 19, 2007 

Expert Disclosures Due: December 3, 2007 

Rebuttal Expert Disclosures Due: January 7, 2008 

Dispositive Motion Deadline: February 15, 2008 

Final Pre-Trial Conference: April 18, 2008 

Trial July 29, 2008 

 The Parties further stipulate only to continue the aforementioned deadlines, leaving the 

March 12, 2007 Order otherwise in tact. The Parties further stipulate to consider this matter 

submitted on this Motion pursuant to Eastern District Court of California Local Rule No. 78-

230(h). 

/// 

/// 

Case 2:06-cv-02687-KJM-GGH Document 18 Filed 09/21/07 Page 2 of 3
B

E

S

S

O

N

T

E

R

H

O

R

S

T LLP

510 BERCUT DRIVE, SUITE V 

SCACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA 95811 

 (916) 444-4300 TELEPHONE 

(916) 444-4321 FACSIMILE

-3- 

STIPULATED MOTION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF PRE-TRIAL AND TRIAL DEADLINES 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

Dated: September 13, 2007 BEESON TERHORST LLP 

 By: /s/ Michael A. Terhorst 

MICHAEL A. TERHORST 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

MICHELLE JAUREGUITO 

Dated: September 18, 2007 JOHNSON SCHACHTER & LEWIS 

A Professional Law Corporation 

By: /s/ Robert Johnson 

ROBERT JOHNSON 

Attorneys for Defendant 

FEATHER RIVER COMMUNITY COLLEGE 

DISTRICT 

ORDER

 Pursuant to the above stipulation the court resets the discovery and expert designations as noted, 

however the court makes the following additional modifications to the pretrial scheduling order: 

All expert discovery to be completed: February 4, 2008 

 

All dispositive motions to be heard no later than: April 11, 2008 

Final pretrial conference: June 13, 2008 at 2:30 p.m 

. 

The Joint Pretrial Statement to be filed: June 6, 2008 

(The parties are to refer to the court’s PSC 

order as to the form and content of the 

statement.) 

Jury trial: September 23, 2008 at 9:00 a.m 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: September 20, 2007 

Case 2:06-cv-02687-KJM-GGH Document 18 Filed 09/21/07 Page 3 of 3