Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-00108/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-00108-7/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
W. Hanks
Defendant
Horace Thomas
Plaintiff

Document Text:

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

HORACE THOMAS, 

 Plaintiff, 

 vs. 

W. HANKS, 

 Defendant. 

______________________________

 )

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

 2:14-cv-00108-GEB-BMK 

FINDINGS AND 

RECOMMENDATIONS TO GRANT 

PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO 

DISMISS (DOC. 38) 

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO GRANT 

PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO DISMISS (DOC. 38) 

On May 31, 2016, Plaintiff Horace Thomas filed a Motion to Dismiss 

his own case. On June 1, 2016, Defendant Hanks filed a Statement of 

Non-Opposition, stating that he does not oppose Plaintiff’s request. The Court 

finds and recommends that Plaintiff’s Motion to Dismiss be GRANTED. See Fed. 

R. Civ. P. 41(a)(2) (authorizing the court to dismiss an action at the plaintiff’s 

request after an answer has been filed). 

These Findings and Recommendations are submitted to the United 

States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 

636(b)(1). Within fourteen (14) days after being served with these Findings and 

Recommendations, any party may file written objections with the Court. Local 

Case 2:14-cv-00108-GEB-BMK Document 40 Filed 06/02/16 Page 1 of 2
2 

Rule 304(b). Responses, if any, are due within fourteen (14) days after being 

served with the objections. Local Rule 304(d). 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: Honolulu, Hawaii, June 1, 2016 

Horace Thomas v. W. Hanks, 2:14-cv-00108 GEB-BMK, FINDINGS AND 

RECOMMENDATIONS TO GRANT PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO DISMISS (DOC. 38). 

 /S/ Barry M. Kurren 

Barry M. Kurren

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 2:14-cv-00108-GEB-BMK Document 40 Filed 06/02/16 Page 2 of 2