Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-14-01710/USCOURTS-ca4-14-01710-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Timothy Allen
Appellant
Starr Atchison
Appellant
Johnny Belsome
Appellant
Tara Belsome
Appellant
Paul R. Burks

Trudy Gilmond

Jody Hinkley
Appellant
Keith Hinkley
Appellant
Brett Hunter
Appellant
Kellie King

Donald Marcel
Appellant
Receiver for Rex Ventures Group, LLC
Appellee
Rex Venture Group, LLC
Appellee
Securities & Exchange Commission

Edward Thiel
Appellant
Nathaniel Woods

Document Text:

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-1710

SECURITIES & EXCHANGE COMMISSION,

Plaintiff,

and

JOHNNY BELSOME; TIMOTHY ALLEN; JODY HINKLEY; DONALD MARCEL; 

KEITH HINKLEY; STARR ATCHISON; EDWARD THIEL; BRETT HUNTER; 

TARA BELSOME, and those similarly situated,

Movants – Appellants,

v.

REX VENTURE GROUP, LLC, d/b/a Zeekrewards.com; RECEIVER FOR REX 

VENTURES GROUP, LLC,

Defendants – Appellees,

and

PAUL R. BURKS; TRUDY GILMOND; KELLIE KING,

Defendants,

and

NATHANIEL WOODS,

Movant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, 

Senior District Judge. (3:12-cv-00519-GCM)

Appeal: 14-1710 Doc: 26 Filed: 01/07/2015 Pg: 1 of 3
2

Submitted: December 22, 2014 Decided: January 7, 2015

Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Marc R. Michaud, New Orleans, Louisiana, for Appellants. Irving 

M. Brenner, Kenneth D. Bell, Matthew E. Orso, MCGUIREWOODS, LLP, 

Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 14-1710 Doc: 26 Filed: 01/07/2015 Pg: 2 of 3
3

PER CURIAM:

Johnny Belsome, et al., appeal from the district 

court’s order clarifying a prior order and directing that any 

payments made by the Receiver be sent to a claimant’s home 

address rather than any third party, including attorneys. This 

court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 

U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral 

orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. 

Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The 

order the Appellants seek to appeal is neither a final order nor 

an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, 

we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense 

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Appeal: 14-1710 Doc: 26 Filed: 01/07/2015 Pg: 3 of 3