Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cr-00232/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cr-00232-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
USA
Plaintiff
Luis Miguel Zamora-Bolanos
Defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Stipulation and [Proposed] Order

CR 07-0232 SI

SCOTT N. SCHOOLS (SCSBN 9990)

United States Attorney

MARK L. KROTOSKI (CASBN 138549) 

Chief, Criminal Division

TAMARA WEBER (ILSBN 6270925)

Special Assistant United States Attorney

450 Golden Gate Avenue; Box 36055

San Francisco, California 94102

Telephone: (415) 436-6838

FAX: (415) 436-7234

tamara.weber@usdoj.gov

Attorneys for Plaintiff

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

LUIS MIGUEL ZAMORA-BOLANOS,

Defendant.

 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CR 07-0232 SI

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]

ORDER EXCLUDING TIME

SAN FRANCISCO VENUE

On April 27, 2007, the parties in this case appeared before the Honorable Susan Illston for a

Trial Setting. At that time, the parties stipulated that time should be excluded from the Speedy

Trial Act calculations from April 27, 2007 through May 25, 2007, for effective preparation and 

continuity of counsel, in that defense counsel required time to review discovery and the United

States required additional time to complete discovery. The parties represented that granting the

continuance was the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation of both defense counsel

and the United States, taking into 

//

Case 3:07-cr-00232-SI Document 7-1 Filed 05/01/2007 Page 1 of 2
 Case 3:07-cr-00232-MHP Document 10 Filed 05/02/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Stipulation and [Proposed] Order

CR 07-0232 SI

account the exercise of due diligence. See 18 U.S.C. §3161(h)(8)(B)(iv). The parties also

agreed that the end of justice served by granting such a continuance outweighed the best interests

of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. See 18 U.S.C. §3161(h)(8)(A).

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Respectfully submitted,

SCOTT N. SCHOOLS

United States Attorney

DATED: 5/1/07 /s/ Tamara Weber 

TAMARA WEBER 

Special Assistant United States Attorney

DATED: 5/1/07 /s/ Steven Koeninger 

 STEVEN KOENINGER

Attorney for Defendant Luis Miguel 

Zamora-Bolanos

As the Court found on April 27, 2007 and for the reasons stated above, the Court finds

that an exclusion of time between April 27, 2007, through May 25, 2007, is warranted

and that the ends of justice served by the continuance outweigh the best interests of the

public and the defendant in a speedy trial. See 18 U.S.C. §3161 (h)(8)(A). The failure to

grant the requested continuance would deny defense counsel the reasonable time

necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence, and

would result in a miscarriage of justice. See 18 U.S.C. §3161(h)(8)(B)(iv). 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED:______________ _________________________________

 THE HONORABLE SUSAN ILLSTON

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:07-cr-00232-SI Document 7-1 Filed 05/01/2007 Page 2 of 2
 Case 3:07-cr-00232-MHP Document 10 Filed 05/02/07 Page 2 of 2