Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_22-cv-01046/USCOURTS-caed-1_22-cv-01046-2/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
City of Bakersfield
Defendant
Frye
Defendant
Roberto Johnson
Plaintiff
Kern County Jail
Defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ROBERTO JOHNSON,

Plaintiff,

v.

KERN COUNTY JAIL, et al.,

Defendant.

No. 1:22-cv-01046-ADA-SKO (PC)

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND 

RECOMMENDATIONS AND DISMISSING 

CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEFENDANTS

(ECF No. 14)

Plaintiff Roberto Johnson is a former county, and current state, inmate proceeding pro se 

and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This matter 

was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local 

Rule 302.

On September 1, 2023, the Magistrate Judge issued findings and recommendations, 

recommending that this action proceed solely on Plaintiff’s Eighth Amendment failure to protect 

claim against Defendant Frye. (ECF No. 14.) The Magistrate Judge recommended that the Court 

dismiss the remaining claims and defendants. (Id.) The findings and recommendations contained 

notice that Plaintiff had fourteen days within which to file objections. (Id. at 3.) That deadline 

has passed, and Plaintiff has not filed objections.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), the Court has conducted a 

de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court concludes that 

Case 1:22-cv-01046-KES-SKO Document 15 Filed 10/25/23 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

the Magistrate Judge’s findings and recommendations are supported by the record and proper 

analysis.

Accordingly,

1. The findings and recommendations issued on September 1, 2023, (ECF No. 14), 

are adopted in full;

2. This action will proceed on Plaintiff’s Eighth Amendment failure to protect claim 

against Defendant Frye;

3. Defendants Kern County Jail, the City of Bakersfield, and Does 1 through 10 are 

dismissed;

4. The remaining claims in Plaintiff’s complaint are dismissed; and

5. The matter is referred back to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 25, 2023 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:22-cv-01046-KES-SKO Document 15 Filed 10/25/23 Page 2 of 2