Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-05929/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-05929-3/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
George Hamilton
Plaintiff
Bill Lockyer
Defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GEORGE HAMILTON, )

)

)

)

Plaintiff, )

)

vs. )

)

)

BILL LOCKYER, et al., )

)

)

Defendant. )

)

)

No. CV-F-04-5929 REC/SMS P

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S

MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION

(Doc. 15)

The court hereby denies plaintiff's motion for clarification

of the court's order denying plaintiff's request for

reconsideration by district court of a magistrate judge's ruling. 

The standard of review for such a request for reconsideration is

whether the magistrate judge's ruling was contrary to law or

clearly erroneous. As the court stated in the July 27, 2005

order, the magistrate judge's denial of plaintiff's motion for

appointment of counsel was neither contrary to law or clearly

erroneous.

///

Case 1:04-cv-05929-NVW Document 16 Filed 08/10/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 9, 2005 /s/ Robert E. Coyle 

668554 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:04-cv-05929-NVW Document 16 Filed 08/10/05 Page 2 of 2