Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-00270/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-00270-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Byron Chapman
Plaintiff
City of Lincoln
Defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

THOMAS E. FRANKOVICH (State Bar No. 074414)

THOMAS E. FRANKOVICH,

A PROFESSIONAL LAW CORPORATION

1832-A Capitol Street

Vallejo, CA 94590

Telephone: (415) 444-5800

Facsimile: (415) 674-9900

Attorney for Plaintiff 

BYRON CHAPMAN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BYRON CHAPMAN,

Plaintiff,

v. 

CITY OF LINCOLN,

Defendant.

___________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO. 2:15-cv-00270-GEB-EFB

STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME

FOR PLAINTIFF TO FILE REPLY TO

DEFENDANT’S OPPOSITION TO

PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR LEAVE

TO AMEND THE COMPLAINT

Date: December 14, 2015

Time: 9:00 a.m. 

Ctrm: 10

Hon. Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. 

Plaintiff BYRON CHAPMAN and Defendant CITY OF LINCOLN by and through their

respective attorneys of record, respectfully request and stipulate, as follows: 

1. Whereas, on November 9, 2015, plaintiff filed a Notice of Motion and Motion 

for Leave to Amend the Complaint; 

2. Whereas, plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to Amend the Complaint is currently

scheduled to be heard on December 14, 2015 at 9:00 a.m. in Courtroom 10; 

3. Whereas, Defendant filed its Opposition on November 30, 2015;

4. Whereas, plaintiff’s Reply is currently due to the Court today, December 7, 2015; 

however, plaintiff needs one additional day to complete;

5. Whereas, plaintiff has currently been out of the office since Thanksgiving and 

therefore has not had an opportunity to complete; 

STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO FILE REPLY

Case 2:15-cv-00270-MCE-EFB Document 16 Filed 12/08/15 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

6. Whereas, defendant has agreed to grant plaintiff with one extra day to file his 

responsive pleading to said motion. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED:

That the last day for plaintiff BYRON CHAPMAN, to file his Reply to Defendant’s

Opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to Amend the Complaint be extended up to and

including December 8, 2015. 

This stipulation may be executed in counterparts and have the same force and effect as

though all signatures are on the same and/or consecutive pages. Photocopies and facsimile shall

have the same force and effect as originals.

Respectfully submitted,

Dated: December 7, 2015 THOMAS E. FRANKOVICH,

A PROFESSIONAL LAW CORPORATION

By: /s/ Thomas E. Frankovich 

Thomas E. Frankovich

Attorney for Plaintiff BYRON CHAPMAN

Dated: December 7, 2015 PORTER SCOTT

By: /s/ Hovannes G. Nalbandyan 

Hovannes G. Nalbandyan

Stephen E. Horan 

Attorneys for Defendant CITY OF LINCOLN

ORDER 

Pursuant to the parties’ stipulation, IT IS ORDERED that the last day for the plaintiff to

file his Reply to Defendant’s Opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to Amend the Complaint

be extended up to and including December 8, 2015. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: December 7, 2015

 

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.

Senior United States District Judge

STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO FILE REPLY 2

Case 2:15-cv-00270-MCE-EFB Document 16 Filed 12/08/15 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO FILE REPLY 3

Case 2:15-cv-00270-MCE-EFB Document 16 Filed 12/08/15 Page 3 of 3