Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-mc-80012/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-mc-80012-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Sedigheh Forsati
In Re

Document Text:

UNITED 

STATES 

DISTRICT 

COURT

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER C 15-80012 LB

UNITED 

STATES 

DISTRICT 

COURT

For the Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Northern District of California

San Francisco Division

SEDIGHEH FORSATI,

Petitioner,

v.

_____________________________________/

No. 15-mc-80012 LB

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE FOR

LACK OF SUBJECT-MATTER

JURISDICTION

On January 21, 2015, Petitioner Sedigheh Forsati, who is proceeding pro se, filed a document

titled “Administrative Remedy Packet.” The document contains attachments with affidavits and

various sworn statements that reference a mortgage transaction between the petitioner and Union

Bank of California. (Exhibit 1, ECF No. 57.) The petitioner’s only request in this filing is that the

court maintain her document as “evidence.” It is not the role of the court to maintain evidence which

is not associated with a pending lawsuit.

If, by this filing, the petitioner had intended to file a lawsuit, she has not met her burden of

establishing subject-matter jurisdiction. The court, therefore, orders the petitioner to show cause

why this action should not be dismissed for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. If within 30 days the

petitioner has failed to file an amended complaint establishing this court’s subject-matter

jurisdiction, the action will be dismissed. Attached to this order is “A Handbook for Pro Se

Litigants” for the petitioner’s use if necessary and a flyer describing the government’s help desk.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

 Dated: June 16, 2015 _______________________________

LAUREL BEELER

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:15-mc-80012-LB Document 2 Filed 06/16/15 Page 1 of 1