Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_02-cv-06107/USCOURTS-caed-1_02-cv-06107-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Delmar Falls
Petitioner
Gail Lewis
Respondent

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DELMAR FALLS, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

)

v. )

)

)

GAIL LEWIS, )

)

Respondent. )

 )

1:02-cv-06107-OWW-TAG HC 

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND

RECOMMENDATION

(Doc. 20)

ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF

HABEAS CORPUS

(Doc. 1)

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO

ENTER JUDGMENT

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. 

On February 12, 2007, the Magistrate Judge assigned to the case filed a Report and

Recommendation recommending that the petition for writ of habeas corpus be DENIED on the

merits. (Doc. 20). The Report and Recommendation was served on all parties and contained notice

that any objections were to be filed within thirty (30) days from the date of service of that order. On

February 27, 2007, Petitioner filed objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. 

(Doc. 21). 

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a de

novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, including Petitioner's objections,

Case 1:02-cv-06107-OWW -TAG Document 22 Filed 03/13/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

the Court concludes that the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation is supported by the

record and proper analysis. Petitioner's objections present no grounds for questioning the Magistrate

Judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Report and Recommendation issued February 12, 2007 (Doc. 20), is ADOPTED IN

FULL; 

2. The petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. 1) is DENIED; and

3. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to ENTER JUDGMENT for Respondent and close the

file.

This order terminates the action in its entirety.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 12, 2007 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger 

emm0d6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:02-cv-06107-OWW -TAG Document 22 Filed 03/13/07 Page 2 of 2