Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-07-06483/USCOURTS-ca4-07-06483-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
P. Bender
Appellee
B. A. Bledsoe

David T. Buckingham
Appellee
J. Bunts
Appellee
J. D. Hill

E. Masteller
Appellee
Abdul-Aziz Rashid Muhammad
Appellant
T. Puckett
Appellee
G. Stone

Harrell Watts

K. M. White

Doris Williams
Appellee

Document Text:

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-6483

ABDUL-AZIZ RASHID MUHAMMAD, a/k/a William A.

Brown,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

J. BUNTS, Health Services Administrator; DAVID

T. BUCKINGHAM, Nurse; E. MASTELLER, PA-C; P.

BENDER, PA-C; T. PUCKETT, PA-C; DORIS

WILLIAMS, Clinical Director,

Defendants - Appellees,

and

J. D. HILL, Associate Warden of Programs; K.

M. WHITE, Regional Director, Mid-Atlantic

Regional Office; G. STONE, Superintendent of

Industry; HARRELL WATTS, Administrator,

National Inmate Appeals; B. A. BLEDSOE,

Warden, FCI Gilmer,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern

District of West Virginia, at Clarksburg. Irene M. Keeley, Chief

District Judge. (1:03-cv-00228-IMK)

Submitted: September 26, 2007 Decided: November 19, 2007

Before WILKINSON and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Appeal: 07-6483 Doc: 24 Filed: 11/19/2007 Pg: 1 of 3
- 2 -

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Abdul-Aziz Rashid Muhammad, Appellant Pro Se. Daniel W. Dickinson,

Jr., OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Wheeling, West Virginia,

for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 07-6483 Doc: 24 Filed: 11/19/2007 Pg: 2 of 3
- 3 -

PER CURIAM:

Abdul-Aziz Rashid Muhammad appeals the district court’s

order accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendations as modified

and denying relief on his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six

Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388

(1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. Muhammad v. Bunts, No. 1:03-cv-00228-IMK (N.D. W. Va. Mar.

1, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Appeal: 07-6483 Doc: 24 Filed: 11/19/2007 Pg: 3 of 3