Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_08-cv-02046/USCOURTS-caed-2_08-cv-02046-11/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Duane Johnson
Plaintiff
Robinson
Defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DUANE JOHNSON,

 Plaintiff, 

v.

E. ROBINSON,

Defendant.

_____________________________

No. 2:08-CV-2046 RCF (P)

 ORDER

1. Plaintiff’s motion for leave to amend the complaint, filed January 11, 2010, is

DENIED. The case shall proceed in compliance with plaintiff’s May 6, 2009 motion to proceed

on a single claim and this court’s May 13, 2009 order to that effect.

2. Plaintiff’s letter filed with this court on February 18, 2010, is construed as a motion to

compel production of documents and DENIED as untimely. The discovery and scheduling order

entered October 1, 2009 required any motion to compel discovery to be filed by January 18, 2010

and plaintiff has failed to establish good cause why that scheduling order should be modified. 

See Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 16(b)(4).

3. Plaintiff’s motion for an extension of time to file an opposition to defendant’s motion

for summary judgment, filed March 3, 2010, is GRANTED IN PART. Plaintiff’s opposition to

the motion for summary judgment is due April 6, 2010. Defendant may file a reply not more

than 7 days after plaintiff’s opposition is served.

4. The deadlines for filing pretrial statements, the pretrial conference date and the trial

date are VACATED pending further order of this court. All other deadlines remain in place. 

//

//

//

Case 2:08-cv-02046-RCF Document 42 Filed 03/15/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

DATED: March 12, 2010 

/s/ Raymond C. Fisher_______________

Raymond C. Fisher

United States Circuit Judge

Sitting by Designation

Case 2:08-cv-02046-RCF Document 42 Filed 03/15/10 Page 2 of 2