Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_19-cv-04264/USCOURTS-cand-4_19-cv-04264-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Alameda County
Defendant
Jerome Bearden
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JEROME BEARDEN,

Plaintiff,

v.

ALAMEDA COUNTY,

Defendant.

Case No. 19-cv-04264-KAW 

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

Re: Dkt. No. 9

On November 20, 2019, Defendant filed a motion to dismiss. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 

7-3(a), Plaintiff’s opposition was due 14 days after the motion was filed, which was December 4, 

2019.

To date, Plaintiff has not filed an opposition or statement of non-opposition. Pursuant to 

the undersigned’s standing order, “[t]he failure of the opposing party to file a memorandum of 

points and authorities in opposition to any motion shall constitute consent to the granting of the 

motion.” (Judge Westmore’s General Standing Order ¶ 23.) 

Accordingly, Plaintiff is ordered, on or before December 19, 2019, 1) to file an opposition 

or statement of non-opposition to the pending motion, and 2) to file a response to this order to 

show cause explaining why the opposition was not timely filed. Should an opposition be filed, 

Defendant may file a reply on or before January 3, 2020. Failure to file an opposition may result 

in the Court reassigning this case to a district judge with the recommendation that the case be 

dismissed for failure to prosecute.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: December 10, 2019

__________________________________

KANDIS A. WESTMORE

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 4:19-cv-04264-KAW Document 14 Filed 12/10/19 Page 1 of 1