Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-04638/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-04638-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Enterprise Rent-A-Car Company of San Francisco
Petitioner
San Francisco Police Department
Defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DENNIS J. HERRERA, State Bar #139669

City Attorney 

JOANNE HOEPER, State Bar #114961

Chief Trial Deputy 

CHRISTINE VAN AKEN, State Bar #241755 

Deputy City Attorney 

Fox Plaza 

1390 Market Street, 6th Floor 

San Francisco, California 94102-5408 

Telephone: (415) 554-3875 

Facsimile: (415) 554-3837 

christine.van.aken@sfgov.org

Attorneys for Defendant 

CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 

[Erroneously sued as San Francisco Police Department] 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

ENTERPRISE RENT-A-CAR 

COMPANY OF SAN FRANCISCO, a 

Nevada Corporation, 

 Plaintiff, 

 vs. 

SAN FRANCISCO POLICE 

DEPARTMENT, and Does 1 through 10, 

inclusive, 

 Defendants. 

Case No. 3:06-cv-04638-MMC 

STIPULATION TO DISMISSAL OF 

FEDERAL CLAIMS AND REMAND 

TO STATE COURT OF REMAINING 

CLAIMS; ORDER 

RECITAL

Plaintiff Enterprise Rent-A-Car Company of San Francisco filed an action in the Superior 

Court of the State of California for the County of San Francisco on or about March 13, 2006, 

alleging four claims against defendant City and County of San Francisco, sued as the San Francisco 

Police Department. Of these claims, the Fourth Cause of Action alleged a civil rights violation 

arising under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against defendant. Defendant was served on June 28, 2006. On July 

28, 2006, defendant removed the action to this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1441(b) and 1443 

because of the federal cause of action alleged by plaintiff. 

Case 3:06-cv-04638-MMC Document 9 Filed 10/24/06 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

The parties have now agreed that plaintiff will dismiss its fourth cause of action arising under 

42 U.S.C. § 1983 with prejudice, and that this matter should be remanded to state court for 

adjudication of plaintiff's remaining causes of action. The parties therefore request that this Court 

enter an Order dismissing plaintiff's fourth cause of action with prejudice, and remanding the matter 

to state court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c). 

STIPULATION

For the foregoing reasons, the parties, through their undersigned counsel, stipulate and agree 

to entry of an order (1) dismissing plaintiff's fourth cause of action with prejudice; and 

(2) remanding this matter to the Superior Court of the State of California for the County of San 

Francisco.

Dated: October 17, 2006 

DENNIS J. HERRERA 

City Attorney 

JOANNE HOEPER 

Chief Trial Deputy 

CHRISTINE VAN AKEN 

Deputy City Attorney 

By: /s/ 

CHRISTINE VAN AKEN 

Attorneys for Defendant 

CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 

Dated: October 22, 2006 

 CHRISTOPHER R. MILTON, ESQ. 

 LAW OFFICES OF CHRISTOPHER R. MILTON 

By: /s/ 

CHRISTOPHER R. MILTON* 

Attorney for Plaintiff ENTERPRISE RENT-A-CAR 

COMPANY OF SAN FRANCISCO 

*The filer of this document attests that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained.

Case 3:06-cv-04638-MMC Document 9 Filed 10/24/06 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

GOOD CAUSE appearing, it is HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's fourth cause of action is 

dismissed with prejudice, and that this matter is remanded to the Superior Court of the State of 

California for the County of San Francisco. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: October 24, 2006 

THE HONORABLE MAXINE M. CHESNEY 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 3:06-cv-04638-MMC Document 9 Filed 10/24/06 Page 3 of 3