Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-10-01350/USCOURTS-ca4-10-01350-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Patricia T. Patterson
Appellant
Kenneth A. Richstad
Appellee

Document Text:

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-1350

PATRICIA T. PATTERSON,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

KENNETH A. RICHSTAD, Clerk of Court,

Defendant – Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Margaret B. Seymour, District 

Judge. (0:09-cv-02051-MBS)

Submitted: June 1, 2010 Decided: June 10, 2010

Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Patricia T. Patterson, Appellant Pro Se. Andrew Lindemann, 

DAVIDSON, MORRISON & LINDEMANN, PA, Columbia, South Carolina, 

for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 10-1350 Doc: 16 Filed: 06/10/2010 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Patricia T. Patterson appeals the district court’s 

order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and 

dismissing her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C. 

§ 1915(e)(2)(B) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find 

that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the 

appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. 

Patterson v. Richstad, No. 0:09-cv-02051-MBS (D.S.C. filed 

Mar. 5; entered Mar. 8, 2010). We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented 

in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

DISMISSED

Appeal: 10-1350 Doc: 16 Filed: 06/10/2010 Pg: 2 of 2