Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-01556/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-01556-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Val Eugene Lacey
Petitioner
State of California
Respondent

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

VAL EUGENE LACEY,

Petitioner, No. CIV S-06-1556 FCD EFB P

vs.

STATE OF CALIFORNIA,

Respondent. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

On July 26, 2006, the court dismissed petitioner’s application for a writ of habeas corpus

for failure to specify the grounds for relief in his petition and for failing to sign the petition, see

Rule 2(c), Rules Governing § 2254 Cases, gave petitioner 30 days to file an amended petition

correcting those deficiencies and warned plaintiff that the failure to file an amended petition

would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed.

The 30-day period has expired and petitioner has not filed an amended petition or

otherwise responded to the court’s order.

Accordingly, it is hereby RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed. See Rules

2(c), 4, Rules Governing § 2254 Cases. 

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty days

Case 2:06-cv-01556-FCD-EFB Document 7 Filed 09/15/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written

objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned

“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Failure to file objections

within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Turner v.

Duncan, 158 F.3d 449, 455 (9th Cir. 1998); Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

Dated: September 14, 2006.

\lace1556.f&r fta

Case 2:06-cv-01556-FCD-EFB Document 7 Filed 09/15/06 Page 2 of 2