Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca8-06-01441/USCOURTS-ca8-06-01441-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Philip L. Burgess
Appellant
U.S. Parole Commission
Appellee

Document Text:

1

The Honorable Fernando J. Gaitan, Jr., Chief Judge, United States District

Court for the Western District of Missouri.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 06-1441

___________

Philip L. Burgess, *

*

Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* Western District of Missouri.

U.S. Parole Commission, *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellee. *

___________

Submitted: April 5, 2007

Filed: April 9, 2007

___________

Before RILEY, HANSEN, and MELLOY, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Philip L. Burgess appeals the district court’s1

 order denying his 28 U.S.C.

§ 2241 petition, wherein he challenged the failure of the United States Parole

Commission to convert his foreign sentence to a sentence for an analogous United

States offense pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 4106A, following his transfer to the United

States to serve a sentence imposed in Mexico. Having conducted careful de novo

review, see Hutchings v. U. S. Parole Comm’n, 201 F.3d 1006, 1008-09 (8th Cir.

Appellate Case: 06-1441 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/09/2007 Entry ID: 3296625
2

We decline to consider Burgess’s arguments raised for the first time on appeal,

which are based on allegations not made in the district court. See Naucke v. City of

Park Hills, 284 F.3d 923, 927 n.2 (8th Cir. 2002).

-2-

2000) (standard of review), we affirm the judgment of the district court for the reasons

explained by the court.2

 See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________

Appellate Case: 06-1441 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/09/2007 Entry ID: 3296625