Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_09-cv-05004/USCOURTS-cand-3_09-cv-05004-6/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
City of Santa Rosa
Defendant
James A. Mitchel
Plaintiff

Document Text:

LITTLER MENDELSON 

A P ROFESSIONAL C ORPORATION

650 California Street 

20th Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94108.2693 

415.433.1940 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Case No. CV-09-5004 SI 

[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANT CITY OF SANTA ROSA 

MAUREEN E. MCCLAIN, Bar No. 062050 

Email: mmcclain@littler.com 

CONSTANCE E. NORTON, Bar No. 146365 

Email: cnorton@littler.com 

LITTLER MENDELSON 

A Professional Corporation 

650 California Street 

20th Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94108.2693 

Telephone: 415.433.1940 

Facsimile: 415.399.8490 

Attorneys for Defendant 

CITY OF SANTA ROSA 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

JAMES A MITCHEL, 

Plaintiff, 

v.

CITY OF SANTA ROSA and DOES 1 

through 50, inclusive, 

Defendant.

Case No. CV-09-5004 SI 

[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF 

DEFENDANT CITY OF SANTA ROSA

COMPLAINT FILED: September 30, 2009

Case 3:09-cv-05004-SI Document 91 Filed 07/28/10 Page 1 of 2
LITTLER MENDELSON 

A P ROFESSIONAL C ORPORATION

650 California Street 

20th Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94108.2693 

415.433.1940 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 1. Case No. CV-09-5004 SI 

[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANT CITY OF SANTA ROSA 

On April 26, 2010, the Motion to Dismiss Second Amended Complaint and Renewed 

Motion for Sanctions filed by Defendant City of Santa Rosa (“Defendant”) was resolved without 

hearing by this Court pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-1(b). See Docket No. 75. On July 12, 2010, 

pursuant to the Order Granting Defendant’s Request for Attorneys’ Fees, the Court granted 

Defendant’s requests for attorneys’ fees payable as sanctions against James A. Mitchel (“Plaintiff”) 

and his attorney, Scott A. Lewis, jointly and severally, in the amount of $31,618.30. See Docket No. 

85.

Having determined pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) that 

Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, and 

having granted, in part, Defendant’s renewed Motion for Sanctions, this Court HEREBY ORDERS, 

ADJUDGES AND DECREES that Plaintiff take nothing and that his Second Amended Complaint 

is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

JUDGMENT IS HEREBY ENTERED in favor of Defendant. Attorneys’ fees are 

awarded to Defendant in the total sum of $31,618.30 and shall be payable as sanctions jointly and 

severally by Plaintiff and his counsel, Scott A. Lewis, to be paid within sixty days of the Court’s 

July 12, 2010 Order Granting Defendant’s Request For Attorneys’ Fees. Subject to filing a timely 

Bill of Costs, Defendant is entitled to costs allowed by law. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: __________________________ _____________________________________ 

HON. SUSAN ILLSTON 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 

7/26/10

Case 3:09-cv-05004-SI Document 91 Filed 07/28/10 Page 2 of 2