Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-15-07062/USCOURTS-ca4-15-07062-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Learley Reed Goodwin
Appellant
United States of America
Appellee

Document Text:

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-7062

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

LEARLEY REED GOODWIN, a/k/a Goodie, a/k/a Lonnie Ross,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

Maryland, at Greenbelt. Roger W. Titus, Senior District Judge. 

(8:04-cr-00235-RWT-3; 8:13-cv-02944-RWT; 8:14-cv-02120-RWT)

Submitted: October 15, 2015 Decided: October 20, 2015

Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Learley Reed Goodwin, Appellant Pro Se. Adam Kenneth Ake, 

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Mara Zusman Greenberg, 

Deborah A. Johnston, Assistant United States Attorneys, 

Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 15-7062 Doc: 11 Filed: 10/20/2015 Pg: 1 of 3
2

PER CURIAM:

Learley Reed Goodwin seeks to appeal the district court’s 

order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. The 

order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues 

a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B)

(2012). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a 

substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 

28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies 

relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by 

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the 

district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is 

debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 

(2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). 

When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the 

prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural 

ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable 

claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. 

at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that 

Goodwin has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we 

deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

Appeal: 15-7062 Doc: 11 Filed: 10/20/2015 Pg: 2 of 3
3

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Appeal: 15-7062 Doc: 11 Filed: 10/20/2015 Pg: 3 of 3