Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-00417/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-00417-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Cathy Mendoza-Powers
Respondent
Bee Yang
Petitioner

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BEE YANG,

Petitioner,

v.

CATHY MENDOZA-POWERS,

Respondent.

CIV S-05-0417 DFL DAD P

ORDER

On June 1, 2005, respondent filed a request for a three-day enlargement of time in

which to file a response to petitioner’s petition for writ of habeas corpus. Subsequently on June 2,

2005, respondent filed a motion to dismiss and documents in support of the motion. GOOD CAUSE

APPEARING, respondent is granted an enlargement of time nunc pro tunc, and the motion to

dismiss is deemed timely filed. Petitioner shall file his opposition or statement of non-opposition

to the motion to dismiss within thirty days of service of the motion. Respondent’s reply, if any, shall

be filed within fifteen days thereafter.

DATED: June 3, 2005.

DAD:4

yang0417.eot2

Case 2:05-cv-00417-JAM-CHS Document 15 Filed 06/03/05 Page 1 of 1