Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_16-cv-00280/USCOURTS-caed-1_16-cv-00280-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Javier Arias
Plaintiff
Ruan Transport Corporation
Defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JAVIER ARIAS,

Plaintiff,

v.

RUAN TRANSPORT CORPORATION,

Defendant.

Case No. 1:16-cv-00280-SAB

ORDER DISMISSING TWELFTH CAUSE 

OF ACTION FROM THE COMPLAINT 

(ECF No. 11)

On August 4, 2016, the parties filed a stipulation to dismiss Plaintiff’s twelfth cause of 

action with prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (ECF 

No. 11.) 

Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), a “plaintiff may dismiss an action 

without a court order by filing a stipulation of dismissal signed by all parties who have 

appeared.” “[A] dismissal under Rule 41(a)(1) is effective on filing, no court order is required, 

the parties are left as though no action had been brought, the defendant can’t complain, and the 

district court lacks jurisdiction to do anything about it.” Commercial Space Mgmt. Co., Inc. v. 

Boing Co., Inc., 193 F.3d 1074, 1078 (9th Cir. 1999). 

\ \ \

\ \ \

\ \ \

Case 1:16-cv-00280-SAB Document 12 Filed 08/05/16 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, pursuant to the stipulation of the parties,

the twelfth cause of action in Plaintiff’s complaint is dismissed with prejudice. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 5, 2016 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:16-cv-00280-SAB Document 12 Filed 08/05/16 Page 2 of 2