Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_19-cv-00490/USCOURTS-cand-4_19-cv-00490-3/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
City and County of San Francisco
Defendant
Jesse Greenberg
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

United States District Court 

Northern District of Californi

a

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

JESSE GREENBERG, 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, 

Defendant.

CASE NO. 19-cv-00490-YGR 

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR 

EXTENSION OF TIME 

Dkt. No. 34 

 This Court previously granted the request of plaintiff Jesse Greenberg to file a Second 

Amended Complaint and allowed defendant until May 14, 2019, to file a response. (Dkt. No. 29.) 

Defendants filed their motion to dismiss on April 26, 2019. (Dkt. No. 30.) Plaintiff Jesse 

Greenberg was required to file a response by May 10, 2019. When plaintiff failed to do so, the 

Court, on its own motion, extended his time to respond to May 28, 2019, by Order issued May 15, 

2019. (Dkt. No. 33.) 

On May 17, 2019, the Court received plaintiff’s motion for extension of time, postmarked 

May 15, 2019. (Dkt. No. 34.) Therein, plaintiff states good cause for an extension of time to 

respond to the motion to dismiss. The Court has reviewed defendants’ opposition to the request 

for extension, and their arguments are noted. 

The Court ORDERS that plaintiff Jesse Greenberg shall file his response to the motion to 

dismiss postmarked no later than June 14, 2019. No additional extensions of time to respond to 

the motion dismiss will be granted absent extraordinary circumstances. 

The Court again observes that plaintiff has been given multiple opportunities to identify a 

claim against the defendants and has failed to do so. Failure of plaintiff to submit an opposition 

postmarked no later than June 14, 2019, will result in dismissal of this lawsuit either 

substantively and with prejudice, or for failure to prosecute. 

Defendant’s reply to any opposition must be served and filed not more than 7 days after 

Case 4:19-cv-00490-YGR Document 36 Filed 05/24/19 Page 1 of 2
2 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

United States District Court 

Northern District of Californi

a

the opposition is served and filed. Civ. L.R. 7-3(c). 

The Court again advises plaintiff that he may seek free assistance through the Court’s 

Legal Help Center. Parties can make an appointment to speak with an attorney who can provide 

basic legal information and assistance. The Help Center does not see people on a “drop-in” basis, 

and will not be able to represent parties in their cases. There is no charge for this service. To 

make an appointment with the Legal Help Center, one may: (1) sign up in person on the 

appointment book outside the Legal Help Center offices at the San Francisco Courthouse (15th 

Floor, Room 2796) or Oakland Courthouse (Room 470S); (2) call 415-782-8982; or (3) email 

federalprobonoproject@sfbar.org. The Help Center’s website is available at 

https://cand.uscourts.gov/legal-help. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: May 24, 2019 

 YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

Case 4:19-cv-00490-YGR Document 36 Filed 05/24/19 Page 2 of 2