Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-02458/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-02458-3/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Michael Chertoff
Respondent
Alberto R. Gonzales
Respondent
Emilio Gonzalez
Respondent
Manmohanjit Singh
Petitioner
David Still
Respondent

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION TO EXTEND BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND HEARING DATE

C 06-2458-EMC 1

SCOTT N. SCHOOLS, SCSBN 9990

United States Attorney

JOANN M. SWANSON, CSBN 88143

Chief, Civil Division

EDWARD A. OLSEN, CSBN 214150

Assistant United States Attorney

450 Golden Gate Avenue, Box 36055

San Francisco, California 94102

Telephone: (415) 436-6915

FAX: (415) 436-6927

Attorneys for Respondents

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

MANMOHANJIT SINGH, 

Petitioner,

v.

DAVID STILL, in his Official Capacity,

District Director, U.S. Citizenship and

Immigration Services, United States

Department of Homeland Security, San

Francisco, California; EMILIO

GONZALEZ, in his Official Capacity,

Director, Bureau of Citizenship and

Immigration Services, United States

Department of Homeland Security;

MICHAEL CHERTOFF, in his Official

Capacity, Secretary, United States

Department of Homeland Security;

ALBERTO R. GONZALES, in his

Official Capacity, Attorney General, U.S.

Department of Justice,

Respondents.

 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. C 06-2458-EMC

REVISED STIPULATION TO EXTEND

BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND HEARING

DATE; AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

The petitioner, by and through his attorneys of record, and respondents, by and through

their attorneys of record, hereby stipulate, subject to approval of the Court, to the following:

1. The petitioner filed a petition for writ of mandamus on April 7, 2006, seeking an order

directing the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services to adjudicate two I-485

applications of adjustment of status.

Case 3:06-cv-02458-EMC Document 35 Filed 05/08/07 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION TO EXTEND BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND HEARING DATE

C 06-2458-EMC 2

2. Following cross-motions for summary judgment and a hearing, this Court issued an order

on January 8, 2007, granting petitioner’s motion for summary judgment, denying respondents’

motion for summary judgment, and directing the respondents to adjudicate the petitioner’s I-485

applications forthwith.

3. The petitioner filed a motion for attorney’s fees on April 5, 2007, and set a hearing date for

May 30, 2007.

4. The parties have met and conferred, and believe that there is a possibility that the

petitioner’s motion for attorney’s might be resolved and that further discussion of this possibility

is warranted.

5. The parties therefore agree, subject to court approval, to extend the deadline for filing the

respondents’ opposition to the motion for summary judgment, and respectfully ask this Court to

extend the date of the hearing in this matter, currently scheduled for May 30, 2007, to July 25,

2007. The respondents will file their opposition to petitioner’s motion for attorney’s fees, if any, 

no later than 21 days prior to the July 25, 2007 hearing date, and petitioner will file his reply, if

any, no later than 14 days prior to the July 25, 2007 hearing date.

Case 3:06-cv-02458-EMC Document 35 Filed 05/08/07 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION TO EXTEND BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND HEARING DATE

C 06-2458-EMC 3

Dated: May 7, 2007 /s/

STACY TOLCHIN

Van Der Hout, Brigagliano and Nightingale

Attorneys for Petitioner

Dated: May 7, 2007

SCOTT N. SCHOOLS

United States Attorney 

/s/

EDWARD A. OLSEN

Assistant United States Attorney

Attorney for Respondents

ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED that the respondents’ opposition to

petitioner’s motion for attorney’s fees is due on or before July 3 ; that petitioner’s reply, if any, is rd

due on or before July 11, 2007, and that the hearing be re-scheduled from May 30, 2007, to July

25, 2007.

Dated: May ___, 2007 _____________________________

EDWARD M. CHEN

United States Magistrate Judge

8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Edward M. Chen

Case 3:06-cv-02458-EMC Document 35 Filed 05/08/07 Page 3 of 3