Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca5-15-11184/USCOURTS-ca5-15-11184-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Selena Ball
Appellant
United States of America
Appellee

Document Text:

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-11184

Summary Calendar 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee 

v. 

SELENA BALL, 

Defendant-Appellant 

Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the Northern District of Texas 

USDC No. 3:14-CR-451-9 

Before JONES, WIENER, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Selena Ball has moved for leave to 

withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 

386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). 

Ball has filed a response. The record is not sufficiently developed to allow us 

to make a fair evaluation of Ball’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel; we 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

March 3, 2017

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 15-11184 Document: 00513896918 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/03/2017
No. 15-11184

2 

therefore decline to consider the claim without prejudice to collateral review. 

See United States v. Isgar, 739 F.3d 829, 841 (5th Cir. 2014). 

We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant parts of the record 

reflected therein, as well as Ball’s response. We concur with counsel’s 

assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. 

Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused 

from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See

5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 15-11184 Document: 00513896918 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/03/2017