Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-01625/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-01625-20/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Roberts
Defendant
Pierre Evans Simmons
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

PIERRE EVANS SIMMONS,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-05-1625 LKK KJM P

vs.

ROBERTS,

Defendant. ORDER

 /

On December 3, 2009, plaintiff filed a motion in which he asks that the court

“reinstate” a claim from plaintiff’s complaint regarding “property destruction.” The December

3 filing, which is truncated, attaches a copy of the original complaint. rd

In its November 20, 2009 order, the court granted plaintiff twenty days within

which to file a motion for leave to file an amended complaint. Plaintiff’s counsel has not filed

such a motion, and the motion he has filed does not provide any reason for the court to revisit its

November 20 ruling. 

th

/////

/////

/////

/////

Case 2:05-cv-01625-KJM Document 99 Filed 01/07/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s December 3, 2009 “motion

to reinstate cause regarding property destruction . . .” (#90) is denied.

DATED: January 6, 2010.

1

simm1625.mtr

Case 2:05-cv-01625-KJM Document 99 Filed 01/07/10 Page 2 of 2