Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca11-15-13054/USCOURTS-ca11-15-13054-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Terrance Reid
Appellant
United States of America
Appellee

Document Text:

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 15-13054

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D.C. Docket No. 1:13-cr-00465-ODE-ECS-1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff-Appellee,

 versus

TERRANCE REID, 

 Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Georgia

________________________

(February 29, 2016)

Before WILSON, ROSENBAUM, and EDMONDSON, Circuit Judges.

USCA11 Case: 15-13054 Date Filed: 02/29/2016 Page: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM: 

Terrance Reid appeals his 13-month sentence, imposed for violating his 

supervised release by possessing and using controlled substances. The district 

court committed no procedural error by discussing treatment options available to 

Reid before imposing the sentence: the court, as a matter of law, was required to 

impose some imprisonment; and nothing in the record indicates that rehabilitation 

(for example, by means of some course of treatment) was a reason for the length of 

the sentence. To the extent that Reid faults the court simply for discussing 

rehabilitation and treatment options at sentencing, the doctrine of invited error 

precludes his argument on appeal: Reid’s counsel introduced the topic at the 

hearing. Moreover, for the court to discuss rehabilitation at sentencing is not error. 

See United States v. Vandergrift, 754 F.3d 1303, 1311 (11th Cir. 2014). 

AFFIRMED.

USCA11 Case: 15-13054 Date Filed: 02/29/2016 Page: 2 of 2