Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_07-cv-05173/USCOURTS-cand-4_07-cv-05173-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Patricia McMahon
Plaintiff
The Regents of the University of California
Defendant

Document Text:

- 1 -

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO REMAND TO STATE COURT Case No.: C 07 5173 CW 

SCHIFF

HARDIN LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN FRANCISCO

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

SCHIFF HARDIN LLP 

WILLIAM J. CARROLL (CSB #118106) 

SARAH R. SPEAKMAN (CSB #215085) 

One Market, Spear Street Tower, 32nd Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94105 

Telephone: (415) 901-8700 

Facsimile: (415) 901-8701 

Attorneys for Defendant 

THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

PATRICIA MCMAHON, 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF 

CALIFORNIA, 

 Defendant. 

Case No. C 07 5173 CW 

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO 

REMAND TO STATE COURT 

(Superior Court of California, County of 

San Francisco, Case No. CGC 07 

466771) 

Plaintiff Patricia McMahon and defendant The Regents of the University of 

California, by and through their respective counsel, hereby agree and stipulate as 

follows: 

WHEREAS Plaintiff filed her Complaint on August 30, 2007 and served it on 

Defendant on September 6, 2007; 

WHEREAS Defendant’s initial responsive pleading was due on or before 

October 9, 2007; 

WHEREAS on October 9, 2007, pursuant to 28 USC § 1441, Defendant filed a 

Notice of Removal to the United States District Court of Northern California. The case, 

C075173CW, was assigned to Judge Claudia Wilken; 

WHEREAS Plaintiff requested Defendant withdraw its Notice of Removal, agree 

to a remand of the case to California Superior Court, County of San Francisco, and 

Case 4:07-cv-05173-CW Document 6 Filed 10/25/07 Page 1 of 2
- 2 -

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO REMAND TO STATE COURT Case No.: C 07 5173 CW 

SCHIFF

HARDIN LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN FRANCISCO

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Plaintiff be allowed to file an amended Complaint. In return Plaintiff will grant Defendant 

an extension of time until at least November 16, 2007, to file a responsive pleading. 

The parties stipulate to the following: 

1. The Notice of Removal will be withdrawn by Defendant; 

2. The Complaint is to be remanded to California Superior Court, County of 

San Francisco; 

3. Plaintiff can and/or will file an Amended Complaint in California Superior 

Court, County of San Francisco; 

4. Defendant has until November 16, 2007, or whenever the responsive 

pleading to the Amended Complaint is statutorily due, whichever is later, to file its 

responsive pleading to Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint. 

DATED: October _____, 2007 SCHIFF HARDIN LLP 

By 

 Sarah R. Speakman 

Attorneys for Defendant 

THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF 

CALIFORNIA 

DATED: October ______, 2007 MINAMI TAMAKI LLP 

By 

 BRAD YAMAUCHI 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

PATRICIA McMAHON 

/// 

IT IS SO ORDERED 

DATED: October 25, 2007 

By 

 Hon. Claudia Wilken 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, 

NORTHERN DISTRICT CALIFORNIA 

SF\ 9011900.1 

Case 4:07-cv-05173-CW Document 6 Filed 10/25/07 Page 2 of 2