Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cr-00284/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cr-00284-11/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Mohammad Adil
Defendant
Akram Sabar Chaudhry
Defendant
Adil Mohammad
Defendant
Akram Sabar
Defendant
USA
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

KEVIN V. RYAN (CASBN 118321)

United States Attorney

EUMI L. CHOI (WVSBN 0722)

Chief, Criminal Division

BLAKE D. STAMM (CTBN 301887)

Assistant United States Attorney

450 Golden Gate Avenue, Box 36055

San Francisco, California 94102

Telephone: (415) 436-7210

Fax: (415) 436-7234

Attorneys for Plaintiff

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

AKRAM SABAR CHAUDHRY,

a.k.a. Akram Sabar, and 

MOHAMMAD ADIL

a.k.a. Adil Mohammad,

 

Defendants.

 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CR 05 00284 SI

[PROPOSED] ORDER AND

STIPULATION FOR CONTINUANCE

FROM MARCH 24, 2006 TO APRIL 21,

2006 AND EXCLUDING TIME FROM

THE SPEEDY TRIAL ACT

CALCULATION (18 U.S.C. §

3161(h)(8)(A))

With the agreement of the parties, and with the consent of the defendants, the Court

enters this order continuing a scheduling and trial setting appearance before the district court

from March 24, 2006 to April 21, 2006 at 11:15 A.M. before the Honorable Susan Illston, and

documenting the defendant’s exclusion of time under the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161(b),

from March 24, 2006 to April 21, 2006. The parties agree, and the Court finds and holds, as

follows:

1. The defendants agree to an exclusion of time under the Speedy Trial Act. Failure to

grant the requested continuance would unreasonably deny defense counsel reasonable time

necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence as set out

below:

Case 3:05-cr-00284-SI Document 53 Filed 03/21/2006 Page 1 of 2
 Case 3:05-cr-00284-SI Document 54 Filed 03/22/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

a. The government has determined that additional discovery is warranted and is

in the process of scanning all discoverable records to include the supplemental

materials. 

b. The government has determined that re-translation of a number of taped

conversations from the Urdu language to the English language is warranted and

has initiated this process. 

2. Given these circumstances, the Court finds that the ends of justice served by excluding the

period from from March 24, 2006 to April 21, 2006, outweigh the best interest of the public and

the defendant in a speedy trial. § 3161(h)(8)(A).

3. Accordingly, and with the consent of the defendant, the Court ordered that the period

from from March 24, 2006 to April 21, 2006 be excluded from Speedy Trial Act calculations

under 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(A) & (B)(iv).

IT IS SO STIPULATED:

DATED: March 21, 2006 _____________/s/__________________

STEVEN F. GRUEL, ESQ.

Attorney for Defendant Chaudhry

DATED: March 21, 2006 ____________/s/___________________

DAVID L. ANDERSON, ESQ.

Attorney for Defendant Adil

DATED: March 21, 2006 ____________/s/___________________

BLAKE D. STAMM 

Assistant United States Attorney

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: ______________ _______________________________

HON. SUSAN ILLSTON

United States District Judge

Case 3:05-cr-00284-SI Document 53 Filed 03/21/2006 Page 2 of 2
 Case 3:05-cr-00284-SI Document 54 Filed 03/22/06 Page 2 of 2