Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-arwd-3_04-cv-03038/USCOURTS-arwd-3_04-cv-03038-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Donna Stensby
Plaintiff
Harold Stensby
Plaintiff
Valspar Coatings
Defendant
Valspar Corporation, McCloskey Division
Defendant

Document Text:

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS

HARRISON DIVISION

HAROLD STENSBY and

DONNA STENSBY PLAINTIFFS

v. No. 04-3038

VALSPAR CORPORATION,

MCCLOSKEY DIVISION d/b/a

VALSPAR COATINGS DEFENDANTS

JUDGMENT

On the 27 day of September 2005, this matter came on for th

trial to a duly selected jury consisting of eight members, the

Honorable Robert T. Dawson presiding. The trial continued until

September 28, 2005, when the case was submitted to the jury on

interrogatories and a unanimous verdict was reached as to each

interrogatory as follows:

INTERROGATORY NO. 1: DO YOU FIND BY A PREPONDERANCE OF

THE EVIDENCE THAT VALSPAR CORPORATION SUPPLIED THE DECK AND

SIDING STAIN IN A DEFECTIVE CONDITION WHICH THEN RENDERED IT

UNREASONABLY DANGEROUS AND WHICH PROXIMATELY CAUSED DAMAGES

TO THE STENSBYS?

__________ ______X_____

 YES NO

INTERROGATORY NO. 2: DO YOU FIND BY A PREPONDERANCE OF

THE EVIDENCE THAT THERE WAS NEGLIGENCE UPON THE PART OF

VALSPAR CORPORATION WHICH PROXIMATELY CAUSED DAMAGES TO THE

STENSBYS?

Case 3:04-cv-03038-RTD Document 20 Filed 09/29/05 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: <pageID>
__________ ______X_____

 YES NO

IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED in accordance with the answer to

the above interrogatories and jury verdict, that the Plaintiffs

take nothing on their complaint filed herein and the matter is

DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. All parties are to bear their

respective costs and attorney’s fees.

Dated this 29 day of September 2005. th

/s/Robert T. Dawson

Robert T. Dawson

United States District Judge

Case 3:04-cv-03038-RTD Document 20 Filed 09/29/05 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: <pageID>