Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_13-cv-01528/USCOURTS-caed-1_13-cv-01528-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Michael Benov
Respondent
Jorge Luis Salgado-Pena
Petitioner

Document Text:

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Petitioner is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma 

pauperis with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 

U.S.C. § 2241. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c)(1), the parties have 

consented to the jurisdiction of the United States Magistrate Judge 

to conduct all further proceedings in the case, including the entry 

of final judgment, by manifesting their consent in writings signed 

by the parties or their representatives and filed by Petitioner on 

September 30, 2013, and on behalf of Respondent on October 15, 2013.

Pending before the Court is Petitioner’s motion for leave to file a 

supplemental traverse, which was filed on April 16, 2014. 

JORGE LUIS SALGADO-PENA,

 Petitioner,

v.

MICHAEL BENOV,

Respondent.

Case No. 1:13-cv-01528-BAM-HC

ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON 

PETITIONER’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO 

FILE A SUPPLEMENTAL TRAVERSE 

(DOC. 11)

Case 1:13-cv-01528-BAM Document 12 Filed 07/21/14 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

A court has inherent power to control its docket and the 

disposition of its cases with economy of time and effort for both 

the court and the parties. Landis v. North American Co., 299 U.S. 

248, 254-255 (1936); Ferdik v. Bonzelet, 963 F.2d 1258, 1260 (9th 

Cir. 1992). The Court exercises its discretion to set a briefing 

schedule with respect to Petitioner’s motion for the benefit of the 

Court and the parties. 

Respondent shall FILE no later than thirty (30) days after the 

date of service of this order opposition or notice of non-opposition 

to Petitioner’s motion.

Petitioner may FILE a reply to any opposition filed by 

Respondent to the motion no later than thirty (30) days after the 

date of service upon Petitioner of any opposition filed by 

Respondent. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 21, 2014 /s/ Barbara A. McAuliffe _

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:13-cv-01528-BAM Document 12 Filed 07/21/14 Page 2 of 2