Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-01054/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-01054-4/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
John Doe II
Defendant
William O. Robinson
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

WILLIAM O. ROBINSON,

Plaintiff,

v.

JOHN DOE II, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

CASE NO. 1:05-CV-01054-OWW-LJO-P

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS, AND DISMISSING

ACTION, WITH PREJUDICE, FOR FAILURE 

TO STATE A CLAIM UPON WHICH RELIEF

MAY BE GRANTED UNDER SECTION 1983 

(Docs. 20 and 21) 

ORDER THAT THIS DISMISSAL SHALL 

COUNT AS A STRIKE UNDER 28 U.S.C. §

1915(G)

Plaintiff William O. Robinson (“plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma

pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United

States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72-302.

On June 20, 2006, the Magistrate Judge filed a Findings and Recommendations herein which

was served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the Findings

and Recommendations were to be filed within thirty days. Plaintiff filed an objection to the Findings

and Recommendations on June 29, 2006.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 73-305, this

Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the

Court finds the Findings and Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

///

///

Case 1:05-cv-01054-OWW -LJO Document 24 Filed 07/17/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed June 20, 2006, is adopted in full; and

2. This action is dismissed, with prejudice, for failure to state a claim upon which relief

may be granted under section 1983; and

3. This dismissal shall count as a strike under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 15, 2006 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger 

emm0d6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:05-cv-01054-OWW -LJO Document 24 Filed 07/17/06 Page 2 of 2