Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-19-01927/USCOURTS-ca4-19-01927-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Jeff Bowen
Appellee
City of Greenville
Appellee
Elizabeth Corley
Appellee
Jodie Dudash
Appellee
Gary Fenell
Appellee
Thomas Raymond Firriolo
Appellant
Paul Grant
Appellee
Mark Keel
Appellee
Brad Rice
Appellee
Bobbie Skinner
Appellee
South Carolina Law Enforcement Division
Appellee
Tommy
Appellee
Cyntha Vilardo
Appellee

Document Text:

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-1927

THOMAS RAYMOND FIRRIOLO,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

SOUTH CAROLINA LAW ENFORCEMENT DIVISION, State of South Carolina, 

Employees, et al.; LIEUTENANT ELIZABETH CORLEY, (SLED) South Carolina 

Law Enforcement Division, State of South Carolina; MARK KEEL, Chief of 

(S.L.E.D.), Law Enforcement Division, State of South Carolina; PAUL GRANT, 

Assistant Chief, South Carolina Law Enforcement Division, State of South Carolina; 

CITY OF GREENVILLE, Employees; MR. BRAD RICE; MR. JEFF BOWEN; MR. 

GARY FENELL; MS. JODIE DUDASH; MR. BOBBIE SKINNER; MS. CYNTHA 

VILARDO; MS. TOMMY, of Greenville Cares (Jane Doe),

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at 

Columbia. Shiva Vafai Hodges, Magistrate Judge. (3:17-cv-03319-DCC-SVH)

Submitted: December 3, 2019 Decided: December 20, 2019

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Thomas Raymond Firriolo, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 19-1927 Doc: 7 Filed: 12/20/2019 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Thomas Raymond Firriolo seeks to appeal the magistrate judge’s order directing 

him to file an amended complaint and denying as moot his previous request for an 

extension of time. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. 

§ 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); 

Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). 

The order Firriolo seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory 

or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

DISMISSED

USCA4 Appeal: 19-1927 Doc: 7 Filed: 12/20/2019 Pg: 2 of 2