Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_12-cr-00052/USCOURTS-caed-2_12-cr-00052-8/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
USA
Plaintiff
Leonid Yakovlev
Defendant

Document Text:

1 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

LEONID YAKOVLEV, 

 Defendant. 

 CASE NO. 2:12-CR-0052 WBS 

STIPULATION REGARDING 

EXCLUDABLE TIME PERIODS 

UNDER SPEEDY TRIAL ACT; 

[PROPOSED] FINDINGS AND 

ORDER 

STIPULATION 

Plaintiff United States of America, by and through its counsel of record, and defendant, by 

and through his counsel of record, hereby stipulate as follows: 

 1. By previous order, this matter was set for status on November 19, 2012, at 9:30 a.m. 

 2. By this stipulation, defendant now moves to continue the status conference until 

January 7, 2013, and to exclude time between October 19, 2012 and January 7, 2013, under Local 

Code T4. Plaintiff does not oppose this request. 

 3. The parties agree and stipulate, and request that the Court find the following: 

 a. The government represents that the discovery associated with this case 

includes over 5,000 pages of documents and large spreadsheets detailing over 40,000 

separate transactions, and thousands of fraud complaints to American Express. All of this 

discovery has been produced directly to counsel for the defense. 

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney 

JEAN M. HOBLER 

Assistant United States Attorney 

501 I Street, Suite 10-100 

Sacramento, CA 95814 

Telephone: (916) 554-2700 

Facsimile: (916) 554-2900 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

United States of America 

Case 2:12-cr-00052-WBS Document 26 Filed 11/15/12 Page 1 of 3
2 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 b. Counsel for defendant desires additional time to consult with his client, to 

review the current charges, to conduct investigation and research related to the charges, to 

discuss potential resolutions with his/her client, and to otherwise prepare for trial. 

 c. Counsel for defendant believes that failure to grant the above-requested 

continuance would deny him/her the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, 

taking into account the exercise of due diligence. 

 d. The government does not object to the continuance. 

 e. Based on the above-stated findings, the ends of justice served by continuing 

the case as requested outweigh the interest of the public and the defendant in a trial within 

the original date prescribed by the Speedy Trial Act. 

 f. For the purpose of computing time under the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 

3161, et seq., within which trial must commence, the time period of November 19, 2012, at 

9:30 a.m. to January 7, 2013, inclusive, is deemed excludable pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 

3161(h)(7)(A), B(iv) [Local Code T4] because it results from a continuance granted by the 

Court at defendant’s request on the basis of the Court's finding that the ends of justice served 

by taking such action outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy 

trial. 

/// 

/// 

/// 

/// 

/// 

/// 

/// 

/// 

/// 

/// 

/// 

Case 2:12-cr-00052-WBS Document 26 Filed 11/15/12 Page 2 of 3
3 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 4. Nothing in this stipulation and order shall preclude a finding that other provisions of 

the Speedy Trial Act dictate that additional time periods are excludable from the period 

within which a trial must commence. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

DATED: Nov. 13, 2012 

 

 /s/ Jean M. Hobler___________________ JEAN M. HOBLER 

 Assistant United States Attorney 

DATED: Nov. 13, 2012 

 

 /s/ Bruce Locke _____________ BRUCE LOCKE 

 Counsel for Defendant 

 [as authorized on November 13, 2012] 

O R D E R 

 IT IS SO FOUND AND ORDERED this 14th day of November, 2012. 

Case 2:12-cr-00052-WBS Document 26 Filed 11/15/12 Page 3 of 3