Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_16-cv-01186/USCOURTS-caed-2_16-cv-01186-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Albert Dytch
Plaintiff
Antony Loyola
Defendant
Joseph Loyola
Defendant
Mai Thai Restaurant
Defendant
Mechai LLC
Defendant

Document Text:

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

-1- 

STIPULATED REQUEST TO EXTENT TIME TO FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADING AND ORDER

Michael E. Vinding (State Bar No. 178359) 

BRADY & VINDING 

400 Capitol Mall, Suite 2640 

Sacramento, CA 95814 

Tel: (916) 446-3400 

Fax: (916) 446-7159 

mvinding@bradyvinding.com 

Attorneys for Defendants, JOSEPH LOYOLA, 

Trustee of the LOYOLA TRUST dated December 13,

2009 and ANTONY LOYOLA, Trustee of the LOYOLA

TRUST dated December 13, 2009 

Specially appearing for Defendant, MECHAI LLC dba 

MAI THAI RESTAURANT 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

 

ALBERT DYTCH, 

 Plaintiff, 

vs. 

MECHAI LLC dba MAI THAI 

RESTAURANT; JOSEPH LOYOLA, 

Trustee of the LOYOLA TRUST dated 

December 13, 2009; ANTONY LOYOLA, 

TRUSTEE of the LOYOLA TRUST dated 

December 13, 2009, 

 Defendants. 

CASE NO. 2:16-CV-01186-JAM-KJN

STIPULATED REQUEST TO EXTEND 

TIME TO FILE ANSWER IN EXCESS OF 

28 DAYS; ORDER 

Plaintiff ALBERT DYTCH (“Plaintiff”) and Defendants MECHAI LLC dba MAI THAI 

RESTAURANT; JOSEPH LOYOLA, Trustee of the LOYOLA TRUST dated December 13, 2009; 

and ANTONY LOYOLA, TRUSTEE of the LOYOLA TRUST dated December 13, 2009 

(collectively “Defendants,” and together with Plaintiff, “the Parties”) hereby stipulate, pursuant to 

Local Rule (LR) 143, to an extension of time for Defendants to file a responsive pleading. 

1. Status of Service. 

The status of service is as follows: 

 Joseph Loyola was served on June 15, 2016 with an Answer due on or before 

Case 2:16-cv-01186-JAM-KJN Document 8 Filed 07/06/16 Page 1 of 4
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

-2- 

STIPULATED REQUEST TO EXTENT TIME TO FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADING AND ORDER

July 6, 2016. 

 Mechai LLC dba Mai Thai Restaurant was sub-served and documents were mailed 

on June 17, 2016. The effective date of service is June 27, 2016 with an Answer 

due date of July 18, 2016. 

 Antony Loyola has not yet been served, but counsel has agreed to execute a waiver 

such that a responsive pleading would be due August 19, 2016. 

2. Factual Basis for Proposed Order. 

On June 20, 2016, while on vacation out-of-state, Brady & Vinding was contacted about 

representing certain defendants. Upon return ten days later other defendants contacted Brady & 

Vinding regarding representation. 

On July 1, 2016, counsel for the Parties met and conferred and agreed to engage in 

settlement discussions and seek this order extending time. Thus, the need for this extension became 

apparent today. (LR 144(d).) 

The basis for the requested order is to allow sufficient time for the Parties to engage in 

meaningful settlement discussions. Those discussions will only be facilitated by the hiring of a 

Certified Access Specialist in order to obtain a report regarding barriers to access, if any, which 

exist at the subject property and, if appropriate, a certificate of compliance. That process is 

anticipated to take not less than 30 days. 

Thereafter, if needed, the Parties will utilize the court’s Voluntary Dispute Resolution 

Program (VDRP). 

No prior extensions have been sought or granted. (LR 144(b).) 

3. Due Date for Responsive Pleading. 

The Parties stipulate to extend time for Defendants’ responsive pleadings such that they be 

due on August 19, 2016. This extension does not alter any date or deadline set by Court order, but 

does exceed 28 days. 

/// 

/// 

/// 

Case 2:16-cv-01186-JAM-KJN Document 8 Filed 07/06/16 Page 2 of 4
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

-3- 

STIPULATED REQUEST TO EXTENT TIME TO FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADING AND ORDER

Dated: July 6, 2016 MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C. 

 By: /s/Tanya E. Moore 

Tanya E. Moore 

(As authorized on 7/1/16–L.R. 131(e)) 

Attorneys for Plaintiff Albert Dytch 

Dated: July 6, 2016 BRADY & VINDING 

 By: /s/Michael E. Vinding 

Michael E. Vinding 

Attorneys for Defendants JOSEPH LOYOLA, 

Trustee of the LOYOLA TRUST dated 

December 13, 2009 and ANTONY LOYOLA, 

Trustee of the LOYOLA TRUST dated 

December 13, 2009 

Specially appearing for Defendant MECHAI 

LLC dba MAI THAI RESTAURANT 

Case 2:16-cv-01186-JAM-KJN Document 8 Filed 07/06/16 Page 3 of 4
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

-4- 

STIPULATED REQUEST TO EXTENT TIME TO FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADING AND ORDER

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND ORDERED AND 

DECREED BY THE COURT, AS FOLLOWS:

Good cause appearing, a responsive pleading must be filed by Defendants on or before 

August 19, 2016 in order to avoid a default. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: July 6, 2016 /s/ John A. Mendez 

 HON. John A. Mendez 

 U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 

Case 2:16-cv-01186-JAM-KJN Document 8 Filed 07/06/16 Page 4 of 4