Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_09-cv-01973/USCOURTS-cand-3_09-cv-01973-11/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Daniel Impey
Plaintiff
Office Depot, Inc.
Defendant

Document Text:

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DANIEL IMPEY,

Plaintiff, No. C-09-01973 EDL

v. ORDER DENYING SEALING REQUESTS

 THE OFFICE DEPOT, INC.

Defendant.

_______________________________/

In connection with Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment, both parties filed requests to

seal various documents associated with their briefs. In its Order denying the Motion for Summary

Judgment, the Court stated that neither party had made a showing of “compelling need” to justify

sealing the documents in connection with a summary judgment motion and Ordered the parties to

submit supplemental declarations explaining the compelling need for filing the documents in

question under seal. Neither party filed any declaration, and the Court has confirmed with both

sides that they no longer seek to file the documents in question under seal. Therefore, the parties’

requests to seal (Dkt. nos. 53 and 69-8) are hereby DENIED AS MOOT.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 9, 2010 _______________________________________

ELIZABETH D. LAPORTE

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:09-cv-01973-EDL Document 93 Filed 08/09/10 Page 1 of 1