Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-09-02119/USCOURTS-ca4-09-02119-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Douglas A. Churdar
Appellee
Garrison Hill
Appellee
David T. Rheney
Appellee
Oscar L. Shaw
Appellant

Document Text:

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-2119

OSCAR L. SHAW,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

DOUGLAS A. CHURDAR, PC Law Firm; DAVID T. RHENEY, Esq.

Attorney Nationwide; GARRISON HILL, Judge,

Defendants – Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Greenville. Henry F. Floyd, District Judge. 

(6:09-cv-02149-HFF)

Submitted: June 24, 2010 Decided: June 29, 2010

Before DUNCAN, AGEE, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Oscar L. Shaw, Appellant Pro Se. Mary A. Giorgi, Luanne Lambert 

Runge, GALLIVAN, WHITE & BOYD, PA, Greenville, South Carolina, 

for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 09-2119 Doc: 15 Filed: 06/29/2010 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Oscar L. Shaw appeals the district court’s order 

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and 

dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C. 

§ 1915(e)(2)(B) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no 

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated 

by the district court. See Shaw v. Churdar, No. 6:09-cv-02149-

HFF (D.S.C. Sept. 1, 2009). We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented 

in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Appeal: 09-2119 Doc: 15 Filed: 06/29/2010 Pg: 2 of 2