Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-01104/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-01104-4/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
John M. Black
Plaintiff
Reyes McGuine
Defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOHN M. BLACK, 

Plaintiff,

vs.

DOCTOR REYES McGUINE, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

1:06-cv-01104-LJO-SMS PC

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS (Doc. 16)

ORDER DISMISSING ACTION, WITH

PREJUDICE, FOR FAILURE TO OBEY

A COURT ORDER AND FAILURE TO

STATE A CLAIM (Doc. 14)

ORDER THAT THIS DISMISSAL

COUNTS AS A STRIKE PURSUANT TO

28 U.S.C. § 1915(G)

Plaintiff John M. Black (“plaintiff”), a state prisoner

proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, has filed this civil

rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter

was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72-302.

On April 11, 2007, the Magistrate Judge filed a Findings and

Recommendations herein which was served on plaintiff and which

contained notice to plaintiff that any objection to the Findings

and Recommendations was to be filed within twenty days. To date, 

///

Case 1:06-cv-01104-LJO -SMS Document 17 Filed 06/01/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

plaintiff has not filed any objection to the Magistrate Judge’s

Findings and Recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. §

636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 73-305, this Court has conducted a de

novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire

file, the Court finds the Findings and Recommendations to be

supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed April 11, 2007,

is ADOPTED IN FULL; 

2. This action is DISMISSED, with prejudice, for

plaintiff’s failure to obey the court’s order of February 16,

2007, and for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be

granted; and

3. This dismissal shall count as a strike pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 1915(g).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 31, 2007 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill 

b9ed48 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-01104-LJO -SMS Document 17 Filed 06/01/07 Page 2 of 2