Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_10-cv-00422/USCOURTS-caed-1_10-cv-00422-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Rudolph Hoskins
Plaintiff
The California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitations
Defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RUDOLPH HOSKINS,

 

Plaintiff,

vs.

THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT 

OF CORRECTIONS AND

REHABILITATIONS,

Defendants.

 /

1:10-cv-00422-GSA (PC)

 

ORDER TO SUBMIT SIGNED

APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA

PAUPERIS OR PAY FILING FEE

WITHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a civil rights action pursuant to 42

U.S.C. § 1983, and an application to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. 

However, plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis was deficient in that it did not

include the required original signature of an authorized officer at the institution of incarceration

on the second page of the application. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

Within thirty (30) days of the date of service of this order, plaintiff shall re-submit the

enclosed application to proceed in forma pauperis, with a certified copy of an inmate trust

account statement signed by an authorized officer, or in the alternative, pay the $350.00 filing fee

for this action. 

/ / /

/ / /

-1-

Case 1:10-cv-00422-GSA Document 6 Filed 03/29/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

Failure to comply with this order will result in dismissal of this action. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: March 29, 2010 /s/ Gary S. Austin 

b742a4 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

-2-

Case 1:10-cv-00422-GSA Document 6 Filed 03/29/10 Page 2 of 2