Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-01737/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-01737-8/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Commissioner of Social Security
Defendant
Teresa L. Jackson
Plaintiff

Document Text:

Stip for EOT, 2:15-cv-01737-AC 1 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SACRAMENTO DIVISION 

TERESA L. JACKSON, 

 Plaintiff, 

 vs. 

 

CAROLYN W. COLVIN, 

Acting Commissioner of 

Social Security, 

 Defendant. 

)

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

)

CIVIL NO. 2:15-cv-01737-AC 

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED 

ORDER FOR REMAND PURSUANT 

TO SENTENCE FOUR OF 42 U.S.C. § 

405(g), AND REQUEST FOR 

JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF PLAINTIFF 

AND AGAINST DEFENDANT

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties, through their respective counsel of 

record, that this action be remanded to the Commissioner of Social Security for further administrative 

action pursuant to section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), sentence 

four. 

On remand, the Appeals Council will instruct the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) to reevaluate 

the medical evidence, including all medical-source opinion evidence relating to the claimant’s functional 

capabilities and explain the weight given to the opinion-evidence in accordance with 20 C.F.R. § 

404.1527 and SSRs 96-2p and 96-5p; reevaluate the claimant’s residual functional capacity assessment, 

PHILLIP A. TALBERT 

United States Attorney 

DEBORAH STACHEL 

Acting Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX 

Social Security Administration 

MARLA K. LETELLIER, CSBN 234969 

Special Assistant United States Attorney 

160 Spear Street, Suite 800 

San Francisco, California 94105 

 Telephone: (415) 977-8928 

 Facsimile: (415) 744-0134 

 E-Mail: Marla.Letellier@ssa.gov 

Attorneys for Defendant 

Case 2:15-cv-01737-AC Document 26 Filed 07/25/16 Page 1 of 2
Stip for EOT, 2:15-cv-01737-AC 2 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

if necessary; and reassess steps four and five with the assistance of a vocational expert, if necessary. On 

remand, Plaintiff will have a new hearing and may present new arguments and further evidence to the 

ALJ if such evidence becomes available. 

The parties further request that the Clerk of the Court be directed to enter a final judgment in 

favor of Plaintiff, and against Defendant, Commissioner of Social Security, reversing the final decision 

of the Commissioner. 

 Respectfully submitted, 

 BENJAMIN WAGNER 

United States Attorney 

 

Dated: July 21, 2016 By: /s/ Marla K. Letellier 

 MARLA K. LETELLIER 

 Special Assistant United States Attorney 

 Attorneys for Defendant 

 JACQUELINE A. FORSLUND, ESQ. 

Dated: July 22, 2016 By: /s/ Jacqueline A. Forslund 

 JACQUELINE A. FORSLUND 

 Attorney for Plaintiff 

 (as approved by email on July 22, 2016) 

 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED: 

 

DATED: July 22, 2016 

 

Case 2:15-cv-01737-AC Document 26 Filed 07/25/16 Page 2 of 2