Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_10-cv-01558/USCOURTS-cand-4_10-cv-01558-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Patek Philippe S.A.
Defendant
Raymond Pestalozzi
Plaintiff
Thierry Stern
Defendant
Think Secure Labs
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

JAMES M. BARRETT, ESQ. SBN 190274 

LAW OFFICE OF JAMES M. BARRETT PLC 

789 CASTRO STREET 

MOUNTAIN VIEW, CA 94041 

PH. 650-969-3687 

FX 650-969-3699 

Attorney for Claimant Raymond Pestalozzi 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

RAYMOND PESTALOZZI, an Individual 

DBA THINK SECURE LABS 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

PATEK PHILIPPE S. A. , THIERRY 

STERN, an Individual. 

Defendants. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Case No: CV 10-1558 

PLAINTIFF’S INITIAL CASE 

MANAGEMENT STATEMENT 

 Pursuant to this Court’s Civil Local Rule 16-9 and FRCicP 16(b), Plaintiff herby submits 

this Initial Case Management Statement. 

 On April 12, 2010 Plaintiff filed a complaint against Patek Philippe S.A. and Thierry 

Stern an indicvidual. 

 Defendants have not been served but Plaintiff has filed an Amended Complaint which is 

in the process of being served on Defendants. 

 No Defendants have answered the complaint at this writing. 

 Defendant Patek Philippe is a Corporation based in Switzerland. 

 Defendant Thierry Stern is believed to be a Swiss citizen. 

 

. 

Pestallozzi v. Patek 

Initial Case Management Statement. 

Case 4:10-cv-01558-YGR Document 6 Filed 07/16/10 Page 1 of 4
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

9 

A. STAMENT OF FACTS AND EVENTS UNDERLYING THE ACTION 

Plaintiff has brought this lawsuit to protect his rights of ownership for the Domain 

Patekwatches.com. Plaintiff has not used this Domain for any commercial purpose or to compete 

with Defendant in any manner. Plaintiff believes that Defendant has utilized the World 

Intellectual Property Organization as a tool to take ownership of the Domain without 

compensation. 

B. PRINCIPAL ISSUES 

1. The principal factual issues: 

The right to own the Domain for person use not commercial use 

2. The principal legal issues 

Plaintiff’s right to ownership and prevention of a taking without compensation 

3. The following issues as to service of process, personal jurisdiction, subject 

matter jurisdiction or venue unresolved. 

Defendants are in the process of being served. 

4. The following parties have not been served. 

 Patek Philippe S.A. and Thierry Stern 

 5. Any additional parties that a party intends to join are listed. 

 Unknown at this time 

6. Any additional claims that a party intends to add are listed below. 

 Unknown at this time 

Pestallozzi v. Patek 

Initial Case Management Statement. 

Case 4:10-cv-01558-YGR Document 6 Filed 07/16/10 Page 2 of 4
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

8 

9 

10 

11 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

19 

20 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

7 

12

18

21

C. ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESLOUTION 

Plaintiff is willing to utilize the full scope of ADR services provided by this Court. 

The Court Hereby Orders: 

D. CONSENT TO JURISICTION BY A MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

Plaintiff has Consented to the use of a Magistrate Judge 

The Court Hereby refers this case for the following purposes to a magistrate judge. 

E. DISCLOSURES 

There have been no disclosures until such time as Defendants are represented by counsel 

F. EARLY FILING OF MOTIONS 

To be determined 

G. DISCOVERY 

To be determined 

H. PRETRIAL AND TRAIL SCHEDULE 

To be determined 

 I. DATE OF NEXT CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 

To be ordered by this Court 

J. OTHER MATTERS 

Pestallozzi v. Patek 

Initial Case Management Statement. 

Case 4:10-cv-01558-YGR Document 6 Filed 07/16/10 Page 3 of 4
Pestallozzi v. Patek 

Initial Case Management Statement. 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 K. IDENTIFICATION AND SIGNATURE OF TRIAL COUNSEL 

Dated: July 8, 2010 Respectfully submitted, 

 The Law Office of JAMES M. BARRETT PLC 

By: ..../s/..._JAMES M. BARRETT_________

 JAMES M. BARRETT 

 ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF 

 The Court finds that Plaintiff has submitted an Initial Case Management Statement and 

that upon the recitals contained herein it is in the best interests for this matter to continue this 

Case Management Hearing until __________________ to allow for service of Defendants and 

the opportunity for Parties to Meet and Confer and submit a subsequent Joint Case management 

Statement. 

 IT IS SO ORDERED 

Dated: __________________ _____________________________ 

 Honorable Edward M. Chen 

Case 4:10-cv-01558-YGR Document 6 Filed 07/16/10 Page 4 of 4