Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_20-cv-00359/USCOURTS-caed-2_20-cv-00359-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
County of Tehama
Defendant
Dave Hencratt
Defendant
Human Rights Defense Center
Plaintiff

Document Text:

{02178220.DOCX} 1

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE THE HEARING ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION 

FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION

Stephen E. Horan, SBN 125241

David R. Norton, SBN 291448

350 University Avenue, Suite 200

Sacramento, California 95825

TEL: 916.929.1481

FAX: 916.927.3706

Attorneys for Defendants, COUNTY OF TEHAMA and DAVE HENCRATT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

HUMAN RIGHTS DEFENSE CENTER,

Plaintiff,

v.

COUNTY OF TEHAMA; DAVE 

HENCRATT, Sheriff, individually and in his 

official capacity; and JOHN AND JANE 

DOES 1-10, Staff, individually and in their 

official capacities,

Defendants.

___________________________________/

Case No.: 2:20-cv-00359-WBS-DMC

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO 

CONTINUE THE HEARING ON 

PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR 

PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

Complaint Filed: 02/14/20

This Stipulation is entered into by and between Plaintiff HUMAN RIGHTS DEFENSE CENTER 

(“Plaintiff”) and Defendants COUNTY OF TEHAMA and DAVE HENCRATT (“Defendants”) 

(collectively, “The Parties”) by and through their respective counsel. 

WHEREAS, a hearing on Plaintiff’s Motion for Preliminary Injunction is currently set for April 6, 

2020 at 1:30 p.m.;

WHEREAS, Defendants recently retained counsel to defend them in this matter;

WHEREAS, Defendants’ opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion for Preliminary Injunction is due on 

March 23, 2020;

WHEREAS, the COVID-19 pandemic has impacted Defendants’ and their counsel’s ability to 

investigate the allegations in Plaintiff’s Motion for Preliminary Injunction and prepare an opposition; 

Case 2:20-cv-00359-WBS-DMC Document 14 Filed 03/19/20 Page 1 of 2
{02178220.DOCX} 2

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE THE HEARING ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION 

FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WHEREAS, the parties are engaged in settlement negotiations that may obviate the need for 

litigation;

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by the Plaintiff and the Defendants, by and 

through their respective counsels of record, that good cause exists to continue the date of the hearing on 

Plaintiff’s Motion for Preliminary Injunction to May 4, 2020 at 1:30 p.m., and that opposition and reply 

briefing be due on April 20, 2020 and April 27, 2020, respectively.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Dated: 03/19/20 PORTER SCOTT

A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION

By /s/ David R. Norton

Stephen E. Horan

David R. Norton 

Attorneys for Defendants 

Dated: 03/19/20 ROSEN BIEN GALVAN & GRUNFELD LLP

By /s/Sanford Jay Rosen (authorized 03/18/2020)

Jeffrey L. Bornstein

Ernest Galvan

Lisa Ells

Benjamin Bien-Kahn

Attorneys for Plaintiff

ORDER

GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, the Hearing on Plaintiff’s Motion for Preliminary Injunction is 

dropped from calendar. The deadline for the required Opposition is continued to April 20, 2020 and the 

deadline for the required Reply is continued to April 27, 2020. If no evidentiary hearing is required, the 

court will then take the motion under consideration.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 19, 2020

Case 2:20-cv-00359-WBS-DMC Document 14 Filed 03/19/20 Page 2 of 2