Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_02-cv-02825/USCOURTS-cand-3_02-cv-02825-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Quality Transport, Inc.
Plaintiff
The Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company
Defendant
Truck-Rail Handling, Inc.
Plaintiff

Document Text:

[PROPOSED] Order Granting BNSF’s Miscellaneous Request For Seven Additional Days To File Its Reply 

Brief In Support Of Its Further Briefing Regarding Summary Judgment On Plaintiffs’ Conspiracy To 

Monopolize Claim. 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

Brett L. McKague SBN 160396

Michele Miller SBN 213723 

McKAGUE & TONG 

250 Montgomery Street, Suite 1100 

San Francisco, CA 94104 

Telephone (415) 409-5222 

Facsimile (415) 409-0467 

Jeffery M. Cross 

Daniel C. Curth 

FREEBORN & PETERS LLP 

311 S. Wacker Dr., Suite 3000 

Chicago, IL 60606 

Telephone (312) 360-6430 

Facsimile (312) 360-6597 

Attorneys for Defendant 

THE BURLINGTON NORTHERN AND 

SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – SAN FRANCISCO 

TRUCK-RAIL HANDLING, INC. and QUALITY 

TRANSPORT, INC. 

Plaintiffs,

v.

THE BURLINGTON NORTHERN AND SANTA FE 

RAILWAY COMPANY, 

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)|

No. C 02 2825 JSW 

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING 

BNSF’S MISCELLANEOUS 

REQUEST FOR SEVEN 

ADDITIONAL DAYS TO FILE ITS 

REPLY BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF 

ITS FURTHER BRIEFING 

REGARDING SUMMARY 

JUDGMENT ON PLAINTIFFS’ 

CONSPIRACY TO MONOPOLIZE 

CLAIM.

On May 10, 2005, Defendant THE BURLINGTON NORTHERN AND SANTA FE 

RAILWAY COMPANY (“BNSF”) submitted a Miscellaneous Request for Seven Additional 

Days to File Its Reply In Support of Its Further Briefing Regarding Summary Judgment On 

Plaintiffs’ Conspiracy to Monopolize Claim. 

Case 3:02-cv-02825 Document 201 Filed 05/10/2005 Page 1 of 2 Case 3:02-cv-02825-JSW Document 204 Filed 05/11/05 Page 1 of 2
BNSF’s Miscellaneous Request For Seven Additional Days To File Its Reply Brief In Support Of Its Further 

Briefing Regarding Summary Judgment On Plaintiffs’ Conspiracy To Monopolize Claim. 

.2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

Having considered the Miscellaneous request by BNSF, together with the Declaration of 

Daniel C. Curth, and the court file in this matter, the Court HEREBY GRANTS BNSF an 

additional seven days through and including May 20, 2005, in which to file its Reply Brief In 

Support Of Its Further Briefing Regarding Summary Judgment On Plaintiffs’ Conspiracy to 

Monopolize Claim. No other calendared dates shall be modified by this order. 

The Court FURTHER ORDERS Plaintiffs to no later than May ____, 2005, serve copies of 

all exhibits to their Opposition To Defendant’s Motion For Summary Judgment On Conspiracy 

To Monopolize Claim, and exhibits to the Declarations of Joseph M. Alioto and Howard Gosch, 

or specifically identify the bate ranges for each and every exhibit to the Opposition and 

Declarations. 

 IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: May _____, 2005 

 The Honorable Jeffrey S. White 

Case 3:02-cv-02825 Document 201 Filed 05/10/2005 Page 2 of 2

11

11 /s/ Jeffrey S. White

Case 3:02-cv-02825-JSW Document 204 Filed 05/11/05 Page 2 of 2