Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-01041/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-01041-3/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
James Leo Lawless
Plaintiff
Salinas Valley State Prison
Defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JAMES LEO LAWLESS,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-06-1041 LKK KJM P

vs.

SALINAS VALLEY STATE PRISON,

Defendant. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

By order filed August 29, 2006, plaintiff was granted sixty days leave to file an

amended complaint and application to proceed in forma pauperis. The sixty day period has now

expired, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint, application to proceed in forma

pauperis or otherwise responded to the court’s order.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed

without prejudice. See Local Rule 11-110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty

days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written

objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s

Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the

Case 2:06-cv-01041-LKK -KJM Document 9 Filed 11/16/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951

F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: November 15, 2006. 

/mp

lawl1041.ftafifp

Case 2:06-cv-01041-LKK -KJM Document 9 Filed 11/16/06 Page 2 of 2