Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-01091/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-01091-2/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Heather Robinson
Plaintiff
Starbucks Corporation
Defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 CATHERINE A. CONWAY (SBN 98366) 

 GREGORY W. KNOPP (SBN 237615) 

 MARK R. CURIEL (SBN 222749) 

 STEPHANIE S. DER (SBN 240576) 

 AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER & FELD LLP 

 2029 Century Park East, Suite 2400 

 Los Angeles, CA 90067-3012 

 Telephone: 310-229-1000 

 Facsimile: 310-229-1001 

 cconway@akingump.com 

 gknopp@akingump.com 

 mcuriel@akingump.com 

 sder@akingump.com 

 Attorneys for Defendant 

 STARBUCKS CORPORATION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SACRAMENTO DIVISION 

HEATHER ROBINSON, CASE NO. 2:06-CV-01091-GEB-KJM 

[Assigned to the Hon. Garland E. Burrell, Jr.] 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

STARBUCKS CORPORATION, SCHEDULING ORDER 

Defendant. 

Complaint filed: May 19, 2006 

6113251 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] SCHEDULING ORDER 

Case 2:06-cv-01091-GEB -KJM Document 15 Filed 07/25/07 Page 1 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WHEREAS, the parties previously sought and were granted a discovery extension on 

May 22, 2007 so that defendant Starbucks Corporation could conclude the deposition of 

plaintiff Heather Robinson on June 22, 2007 (Robinson had moved out of state); 

WHEREAS, Robinson was unexpectedly unable to attend her June 22, 2007 

deposition; 

WHEREAS, the parties then rescheduled Robinson’s deposition for July 18, 2007; 

WHEREAS, plaintiff’s counsel was unexpectedly unable to defend Robinson’s 

deposition on July 18, 2007 due to a conflicting trial and will be unable to defend the 

deposition until the trial ends in August; 

WHEREAS, the discovery cut-off (including the resolution of any discovery motions) 

in the above-entitled action is currently set for August 20, 2007; 

WHEREAS, the last date for hearing motions is currently set for September 24, 2007; 

and 

WHEREAS, the parties seek to preserve their opportunity to complete discovery and 

bring any motions; 

/// 

1 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] SCHEDULING ORDER 

Case 2:06-cv-01091-GEB -KJM Document 15 Filed 07/25/07 Page 2 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between Starbucks and Robinson, through their 

attorneys of record, that: 

1. The discovery cut-off be continued to October 17, 2007. 

2. The last date for hearing motions be continued to December 17, 2007. 

3. The November 19, 2007 final pretrial conference date be continued to a date to 

be set by the Court, on or after February 25, 2008. 

4. The January 29, 2008 trial date be continued to a date to be set by the Court, on 

or after April 29, 2008. 

Dated: July 20, 2007 

Dated: July 20, 2007 

AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER & 

FELD LLP 

By / s / 

Mark R. Curiel 

Attorneys for Defendant 

STARBUCKS CORPORATION 

THE VELEZ LAW FIRM 

By / s / 

Mark P. Velez 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

HEATHER ROBINSON 

Pursuant to the parties’ stipulation: 

1. The discovery cut-off is continued to October 17, 2007. 

2. The last date for hearing motions is continued to December 17, 2007. 

3. The November 19, 2007 final pretrial conference date is continued to February 

25, 2008, at 11:00 a.m. 

2 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] SCHEDULING ORDER 

Case 2:06-cv-01091-GEB -KJM Document 15 Filed 07/25/07 Page 3 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

4. The January 29, 2008 trial date is continued to June 3, 2008, at 9:00 a.m. 

 IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: July 24, 2007 Honorable Garland E. Burrell, Jr. 

United States District Judge 

2 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] SCHEDULING ORDER 

Case 2:06-cv-01091-GEB -KJM Document 15 Filed 07/25/07 Page 4 of 4