Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_16-cv-00252/USCOURTS-caed-1_16-cv-00252-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Eric Hollis
Plaintiff
Weatherford US LP
Defendant

Document Text:

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ERIC HOLLIS,

 Plaintiff,

v.

WEATHERFORD US LP,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: 1:16-CV-0252- JLT

SCHEDULING ORDER (Fed. R. Civ. P. 16)

Pleading Amendment Deadline: 6/1/2016

Discovery Deadlines:

Initial Disclosures: 4/26/2016

Non-Expert: 9/23/2016

Expert: 12/9/2016

 Mid-Discovery Status Conference:

7/18/2016 at 10:00 a.m.

Non-Dispositive Motion Deadlines:

Filing: 11/28/2016

Hearing: 12/30/2017

Dispositive Motion Deadlines: 

Filing: 1/13/2017

Hearing: 2/10/2017

Trial: 3/20/2017 at 8:30 a.m.

 510 19th Street, Bakersfield, CA

 Bench trial: 15 days

Pre-trial filings:

Witness/Exhibit Lists: 3/13/2017

Exhibit Binders: 3/17/2017

 

 

Case 1:16-cv-00252-JLT Document 9 Filed 04/26/16 Page 1 of 7
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

I. Date of Scheduling Conference

April 26, 2016.

II. Appearances of Counsel

Michael Cunningham appeared on behalf of Plaintiff.

Sophia Behnia appeared on behalf of Defendant.

III. Pleading Amendment Deadline

Any requested pleading amendments are ordered to be filed, either through a stipulation or 

motion to amend, no later than June 1, 2016.

IV. Fictitiously-Named Defendants

All claims as to “Doe” Defendants, including any counterclaims and cross-claims, are hereby

DISMISSED.

V. Discovery Plan and Cut-Off Date

The parties will exchange their initial disclosures required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1) on April 

26, 2016.

The parties are ordered to complete all discovery pertaining to non-experts on or before 

September 23, 2016, and all discovery pertaining to experts on or before December 9, 2016.

The parties are directed to disclose all expert witnesses, in writing, on or October 14, 2016, and 

to disclose all rebuttal experts on or before November 11, 2016. The written designation of retained 

and non-retained experts shall be made pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. Rule 26(a)(2), (A), (B), and (C) 

and shall include all information required thereunder. Failure to designate experts in compliance 

with this order may result in the Court excluding the testimony or other evidence offered through such 

experts that are not disclosed pursuant to this order.

The written designation of retained and non-retained experts shall be made pursuant to Fed. R. 

Civ. P. 26(a)(2), (A), (B), and (C) and shall include all information required thereunder. Failure to 

designate experts in compliance with this order may result in the Court excluding the testimony or other 

evidence offered through such experts that are not disclosed pursuant to this order.

The provisions of Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(b)(4) and (5) shall apply to all discovery relating to experts 

and their opinions. Experts must be fully prepared to be examined on all subjects and opinions 

Case 1:16-cv-00252-JLT Document 9 Filed 04/26/16 Page 2 of 7
3

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

included in the designation. Failure to comply will result in the imposition of sanctions, which may 

include striking the expert designation and preclusion of expert testimony.

The provisions of Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(e) regarding a party’s duty to timely supplement 

disclosures and responses to discovery requests will be strictly enforced.

The Court sets a mid-discovery status conference on July 18, 2016 at 10:00 a.m. Counsel 

SHALL file a joint mid-discovery status conference report one week before the conference. Counsel 

also SHALL lodge the status report via e-mail to JLTorders@caed.uscourts.gov. The joint statement 

SHALL outline the discovery counsel have completed and that which needs to be completed as well as 

any impediments to completing the discovery within the deadlines set forth in this order. Counsel may 

appear via CourtCall, providing a written notice of the intent to appear telephonically is provided to the 

Magistrate Judge's Courtroom Clerk no later than five court days before the noticed hearing date.

VI. Pre-Trial Motion Schedule

All non-dispositive pre-trial motions, including any discovery motions, shall be filed no later 

than November 28, 2016, and heard on or before December 30, 2016. The Court hears nondispositive motions at 9:00 a.m. at the United States District Courthouse in Bakersfield, California. 

No motion to amend or stipulation to amend the case schedule will be entertained unless it 

is filed at least one week before the first deadline the parties wish to extend. Likewise, no written 

discovery motions shall be filed without the prior approval of the assigned Magistrate Judge. A party 

with a discovery dispute must first confer with the opposing party in a good faith effort to resolve by 

agreement the issues in dispute. If that good faith effort is unsuccessful, the moving party promptly 

shall seek a telephonic hearing with all involved parties and the Magistrate Judge. It shall be the 

obligation of the moving party to arrange and originate the conference call to the court. To schedule 

this telephonic hearing, the parties are ordered to contact Courtroom Deputy Clerk, Susan Hall at (661) 

326-6620 or via email at SHall@caed.uscourts.gov. Counsel must comply with Local Rule 251 with 

respect to discovery disputes or the motion will be denied without prejudice and dropped from 

calendar.

All dispositive pre-trial motions shall be filed no later than January 13, 2016, and heard no 

later than February 10, 2016, before the Honorable Jennifer L. Thurston, United States Magistrate 

Case 1:16-cv-00252-JLT Document 9 Filed 04/26/16 Page 3 of 7
4

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Judge, at the United States District Courthouse in Bakersfield, California. In scheduling such motions, 

counsel shall comply with Fed. R. Civ. P. 56 and Local Rules 230 and 260.

VII. Motions for Summary Judgment or Summary Adjudication

At least 21 days before filing a motion for summary judgment or motion for summary 

adjudication, the parties are ORDERED to meet, in person or by telephone, to confer about the issues 

to be raised in the motion.

The purpose of the meeting shall be to: 1) avoid filing motions for summary judgment where a 

question of fact exists; 2) determine whether the respondent agrees that the motion has merit in whole 

or in part; 3) discuss whether issues can be resolved without the necessity of briefing; 4) narrow the 

issues for review by the court; 5) explore the possibility of settlement before the parties incur the 

expense of briefing a motion; and, 6) to develop a joint statement of undisputed facts.

The moving party SHALL initiate the meeting and SHALL provide a complete, proposed 

statement of undisputed facts at least five days before the conference. The finalized joint statement of 

undisputed facts SHALL include all facts that the parties agree, for purposes of the motion, may be 

deemed true. In addition to the requirements of Local Rule 260, the moving party shall file the joint 

statement of undisputed facts. 

In the notice of motion the moving party SHALL certify that the parties have met and conferred 

as ordered above, or set forth a statement of good cause for the failure to meet and confer. Failure to 

comply may result in the motion being stricken.

VIII. Trial Date

March 20, 2017, at 8:30 a.m. at the United States District Courthouse in Bakersfield, 

California, before the Honorable Jennifer L. Thurston, United States Magistrate Judge.

A. This is a bench trial.

B. Counsels' Estimate of Trial Time: 15 days. 

C. Counsels' attention is directed to Local Rules of Practice for the Eastern District of 

California, Rule 285.

IX. Settlement Conference

If the parties desire a conference with the Court, they may file a joint written request for a 

Case 1:16-cv-00252-JLT Document 9 Filed 04/26/16 Page 4 of 7
5

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

settlement conference. Alternatively, the parties may file a joint written request for referral to the 

Court’s Voluntary Dispute Resolution Program.

X. Request for Bifurcation, Appointment of Special Master, or other Techniques to Shorten 

Trial

Counsel SHALL meet and confer to attempt to reduce the number of witnesses needed at trial.

XI. Pretrial requirements

No later than February 24, 2017, counsel SHALL participate in an exhibit conference at 

which they will discuss any disputes related to the above listed exhibits and will pre-mark and 

examining each other’s exhibits. 

1. At the exhibit conference, counsel will determine whether there are objections to the 

admission of each of the exhibits and will prepare separate indexes; one listing joint exhibits, one 

listing Plaintiff’s exhibits and one listing Defendant’s exhibits. In advance of the conference, counsel 

must have a complete set of their proposed exhibits in order to be able to fully discuss whether 

evidentiary objections exist. Thus, any exhibit not previously provided in discovery SHALL be 

provided at least five court days in advance of the exhibit conference.

2. At the conference, counsel shall identify any duplicate exhibits, i.e., any document 

which both sides desire to introduce into evidence. These exhibits SHALL be marked as a joint exhibit 

and numbered as directed above. Joint exhibits SHALL be admitted into without further foundation.

All Joint exhibits will be pre-marked with numbers preceded by the designation “JT” (e.g. JT/1, 

JT/2, etc.). Plaintiff’s exhibits will be pre-marked with numbers beginning with 1 by the designation 

PX (e.g. PX1, PX2, etc.). Defendant’s exhibits will be pre-marked with numbers beginning with 501 

preceded by the designation DX (e.g. DX501, DX502, etc.). The Parties SHALL number each page of 

any exhibit exceeding one page in length (e.g. PX1-1, PX1-2, PX1-3, etc.).

If originals of exhibits are unavailable, the parties may substitute legible copies. If any 

document is offered which is not fully legible, the Court may exclude it from evidence. 

Each joint exhibit binder shall contain an index which is placed in the binder before the 

exhibits. The index shall consist of a column for the exhibit number, one for a description of the 

exhibit and one column entitled “Admitted in Evidence” (as shown in the example below).

Case 1:16-cv-00252-JLT Document 9 Filed 04/26/16 Page 5 of 7
6

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

INDEX OF EXHIBITS

ADMITTED 

EXHIBIT# DESCRIPTION IN EVIDENCE

3. As to any exhibit which is not a joint exhibit but to which there is no objection to its 

introduction, the exhibit will likewise be appropriately marked, i.e., as PX1, or as DX501 and will be 

indexed as such on the index of the offering party. Such exhibits will be admitted upon introduction 

and motion of the party, without further foundation.

4. Each exhibit binder shall contain an index which is placed in the binder before the 

exhibits. Each index shall consist of the exhibit number, the description of the exhibit and the three 

columns as shown in the example below. 

INDEX OF EXHIBITS

ADMITTED OBJECTION OTHER

EXHIBIT# DESCRIPTION IN EVIDENCE FOUNDATION OBJECTION 

5. On the index, as to exhibits to which the only objection is a lack of foundation, counsel 

will place a mark under the column heading entitled “Admissible but for Foundation.” 

6. On the index, as to exhibits to which there are objections to admissibility that are not 

based solely on a lack of foundation, counsel will place a mark under the column heading entitled 

“Other Objections.”

After the exhibit conference, Plaintiff and counsel for the defendants SHALL develop four 

complete, legible sets of exhibits. The parties SHALL deliver three sets of their exhibit binders to the 

Courtroom Clerk and provide one set to their opponent, no later than 4:00 p.m., on March 17, 2017. 

Counsel SHALL determine which of them will also provide three sets of the joint exhibits to the 

Courtroom Clerk.

7. The Parties SHALL number each page of any exhibit exceeding one page in length.

No later than March 13, 2017 counsel SHALL file a joint witness list and joint exhibit list.1 

No later than March 17, 2017, counsel SHALL lodge any deposition transcripts or discovery 

 

1 Any exhibits intended to be used in the party’s case-in-chief that were not previously disclosed SHALL be provided 

to opposing counsel no later than February 24, 2017. 

Case 1:16-cv-00252-JLT Document 9 Filed 04/26/16 Page 6 of 7
7

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

requests/responses that may be used at trial. 

XII. Related Matters Pending

There are no pending related matters.

XIII. Compliance with Federal Procedure

All counsel are expected to familiarize themselves with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 

and the Local Rules of Practice of the Eastern District of California, and to keep abreast of any 

amendments thereto. The Court must insist upon compliance with these Rules to efficiently handle its 

increasing case load, and sanctions will be imposed for failure to follow both the Federal Rules of Civil 

Procedure and the Local Rules of Practice for the Eastern District of California.

XIV. Effect of this Order

The foregoing order represents the best estimate of the court and counsel as to the agenda most 

suitable to dispose of this case. The trial date reserved is specifically reserved for this case. If the 

parties determine at any time that the schedule outlined in this order cannot be met, counsel are ordered 

to notify the court immediately of that fact so that adjustments may be made, either by stipulation or by 

subsequent status conference.

The dates set in this Order are considered to be firm and will not be modified absent a 

showing of good cause even if the request to modify is made by stipulation. Stipulations 

extending the deadlines contained herein will not be considered unless they are accompanied by 

affidavits or declarations, and where appropriate attached exhibits, which establish good cause 

for granting the relief requested.

Failure to comply with this order may result in the imposition of sanctions. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 26, 2016 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:16-cv-00252-JLT Document 9 Filed 04/26/16 Page 7 of 7