Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-01831/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-01831-2/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Joshua Christensen
Defendant
United States of America
Defendant
Grace Watson
Plaintiff
Zhanna Watson
Plaintiff

Document Text:

Stipulation and [Proposed] Order 1

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

ZHANNA WATSON AND GRACE 

WATSON, 

 Plaintiffs, 

 v. 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JOSHUA 

CHRISTENSEN, AND DOES 1-10, 

Defendants. 

CASE NO. 2:14-cv-01831-JAM-DAD

STIPULATION AND ORDER 

Defendant Joshua Christensen has reached a settlement with Plaintiffs and filed a motion for 

approval of that settlement. (See Dkt. No. 20). The United States is not opposed to the motion, so long as 

Mr. Christensen remains available for deposition and for trial testimony. He is willing to remain subject to 

this Court’s jurisdiction for those purposes, so long as his travel and lodging expenses are covered because 

he lives in North Carolina. Therefore, the parties stipulate that the United States will not oppose the pending 

motion, and Christensen will remain subject to the jurisdiction of this Court for the above- purposes. If 

subpoenaed, his travel and lodging shall be handled by the party or parties seeking his testimony. 

Respectfully submitted, 

DATED: January 13, 2015 BENJAMIN B. WAGNER 

 United States Attorney 

 

 By: /s/ Gregory T. Broderick 

 GREGORY T. BRODERICK 

 Assistant United States Attorney 

 By /s/ John Hallissy (auth. on 01/12/2015)

 JOHN P. HALLISSY 

 Attorney for Defendant Joshua Christensen 

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney 

GREGORY T. BRODERICK 

Assistant United States Attorney 

501 I Street, Suite 10-100 

Sacramento, CA 95814 

Telephone: (916) 554-2700 

Facsimile: (916) 554-2900 

Attorneys for the United States 

Case 2:14-cv-01831-JAM-DAD Document 23 Filed 01/16/15 Page 1 of 2
Stipulation and [Proposed] Order 2

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 ORDER 

 GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 

1. If the United States does not oppose Defendant Joshua Christensen’s pending settlement 

motion (Dkt. No. 20), he shall remain subject to this Court’s jurisdiction for purposes of 

deposition and trial subpoenas even after he is dismissed as a party; 

2. The party or parties seeking Christensen’s testimony shall arrange for his travel and 

lodging at reasonable expense. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Date: 1/15/2015 /s/ John A. Mendez____________ 

 United States District Court Judge 

Case 2:14-cv-01831-JAM-DAD Document 23 Filed 01/16/15 Page 2 of 2