Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-07-07266/USCOURTS-ca4-07-07266-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Lincoln Monroe Brock
Appellant
United States of America
Appellee

Document Text:

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-7266

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

LINCOLN MONROE BROCK,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle

District of North Carolina, at Durham. James A. Beaty, Jr., Chief

District Judge. (1:03-cr-00429-JAB)

Submitted: January 17, 2008 Decided: January 24, 2008

Before TRAXLER, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Lincoln Monroe Brock, Appellant Pro Se. Randall Stuart Galyon,

Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 07-7266 Doc: 10 Filed: 01/24/2008 Pg: 1 of 2
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Lincoln Monroe Brock appeals the district court’s order

denying his Fed. R. Crim. Pro. 33 motion for a new trial predicated

on newly discovered evidence. We have reviewed the record and find

the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Brock’s

motion. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court. United States v. Brock, No. 1:03-cr-00429-JAB

(M.D.N.C., Aug. 10, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Appeal: 07-7266 Doc: 10 Filed: 01/24/2008 Pg: 2 of 2