Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-01808/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-01808-2/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Mika Christina Alfaro
Plaintiff
Bank of America
Defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MIKA CHRISTINA ALFARO,

Plaintiff, CIV-S-06-1808 DFL GGH PS

vs.

BANK OF AMERICA,

Defendant. ORDER

__________________________________/

On November 3, 2006, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations

herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the

findings and recommendations were to be filed within ten days. No objections were filed. On

November 6, 2006, plaintiff filed a declaration which was non-responsive to the findings and

recommendations.

 Accordingly, the court presumes any findings of fact are correct. See Orland v.

United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1999). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are

reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir.

1983).

The court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and, good cause appearing,

concludes that it is appropriate to adopt the Proposed Findings and Recommendations in full.

Case 2:06-cv-01808-DFL-GGH Document 10 Filed 12/21/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that:

1. The Proposed Findings and Recommendations filed November 3, 2006, are

ADOPTED; and

2. This action is dismissed with prejudice. See E.D. Cal. L.R. 11-110; Fed. R.

Civ. P. 41(b).

DATED: 12/19/2006

DAVID F. LEVI

United States District Judge

Case 2:06-cv-01808-DFL-GGH Document 10 Filed 12/21/06 Page 2 of 2