Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-01628/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-01628-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Ovidiu Cozac
Petitioner
Sacramento County Jail
Respondent

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

OVIDIU COZAC,

Petitioner, No. CIV S-07-1628 MCE EFB P

vs.

SACRAMENTO COUNTY JAIL, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Respondent.

 /

Petitioner has filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus. See 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On

December 4, 2007, the court dismissed petitioner’s application for a writ of habeas corpus with

leave to amend within 30 days. 

The 30 days have passed and petitioner has not filed an amended petition or otherwise

responded to that order. 

Accordingly, it is hereby RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed. See Fed. R.

Civ. P. 41(b); Rule 11 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases; L. R. 11-110. 

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty days

after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written

objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned 

Case 2:07-cv-01628-MCE -EFB Document 5 Filed 01/30/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Failure to file objections

within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Turner v.

Duncan, 158 F.3d 449, 455 (9th Cir. 1998); Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

Dated: January 30, 2008.

Case 2:07-cv-01628-MCE -EFB Document 5 Filed 01/30/08 Page 2 of 2