Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca10-15-01167/USCOURTS-ca10-15-01167-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Brian Hicks
Appellant
Spring Spectrum, L.P.
Appellee
Sprint Communications Company, L.P.
Appellee
Sprint Nextel Company, LP
Appellee
Sprint Nextel Corporation
Appellee

Document Text:

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT 

_________________________________ 

BRIAN HICKS, 

 Plaintiff - Appellant, 

v. 

SPRINT NEXTEL CORPORATION; 

SPRINT NEXTEL COMPANY, LP; 

SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS 

COMPANY, LP; SPRING SPECTRUM, 

LP, 

 Defendants - Appellees. 

No. 15-1167 

(D.C. No. 1:14-CV-02857-LTB) 

(D. Colo.) 

_________________________________ 

ORDER

_________________________________ 

This matter is before the court on Appellant’s Response to the Court’s June 4, 

2015 Order, in which Appellant states that an appeal will not be taken in light of the 

district court’s recent decision vacating the order that is the subject of this appeal. 

Appellant’s response is construed as a motion to voluntarily dismiss this appeal 

pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 42(b). So construed, the motion is granted. 

A copy of this order shall stand as and for the mandate of the court. 

Entered for the Court 

ELISABETH A. SHUMAKER, Clerk 

by: Jane K. Castro 

 Counsel to the Clerk 

FILED 

United States Court of Appeals 

Tenth Circuit 

June 23, 2015

Elisabeth A. Shumaker 

Clerk of Court

Appellate Case: 15-1167 Document: 01019449184 Date Filed: 06/23/2015 Page: 1