Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-03644/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-03644-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Modesto Tallow Company
Defendant
Rosemary Mucklow
Plaintiff
Northern California UFCW Wholesale Health & Welfare Fund
Plaintiff
Phil Salgado
Plaintiff

Document Text:

Case Management Statement and Request for Continuance of Case Management Conference [Proposed] Order 

(Case No. C-06-3644 (JSW)) 

WEINBERG, ROGER & 

ROSENFELD 

A Professional Corporation 

1001 Marina Village Parkway 

Suite 200 

Alameda, CA 94501-1091 

510.337.1001

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

BARRY E. HINKLE, Bar No. 071223 

LINDA BALDWIN JONES, Bar No. 178922 

WEINBERG, ROGER & ROSENFELD 

A Professional Corporation 

1001 Marina Village Parkway, Suite 200 

Alameda, California 94501-1091 

Telephone 510.337.1001 

Fax 510.337.1023 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

ROSEMARY MUCKLOW; PHIL SALGADO, 

in their capacities as Trustees of the 

NORTHERN CALIFORNIA UFCW 

WHOLESALE HEALTH & WELFARE 

FUND, 

 Plaintiffs, 

 v. 

MODESTO TALLOW COMPANY, a 

California Corporation, 

 Defendant. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. C-06-3644 (JSW) 

PLAINTIFFS’ CASE MANAGEMENT 

STATEMENT AND REQUEST FOR 

CONTINUANCE OF CASE 

MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; 

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

Date: October 5, 2006 

Time: 9:30 a.m. 

Judge: Honorable Jeffrey S. White 

Ctrm: 2, 17th Floor 

Plaintiffs Rosemary Mucklow and Phil Salgado, in their capacities as Trustees of the 

Northern California UFCW Wholesale Health and Welfare Fund, hereby request that the Court 

continue the October 5, 2006 Case Management Conference for at least 120 days and vacate the 

related deadlines. 

1. Pursuant to the Court’s Order Setting Initial Case Management Conference and 

ADR Deadlines, a Case Management Conference in this action is set for October 5, 2006 at 9:30 

a.m. Other case management deadlines precede and are set in relation to the Case Management 

Conference. 

2. Defendant Modesto Tallow Company, a California Corporation, was timely served 

with the complaint on July 19, 2006, but failed to answer the complaint. A true and correct copy of 

Case 3:06-cv-03644-JSW Document 8 Filed 09/22/2006 Page 1 of 3

AS MODIFIED

Case 3:06-cv-03644-BZ Document 9 Filed 09/27/06 Page 1 of 2
 - 2 - 

Case Management Statement and Request for Continuance of Case Management Conference [Proposed] Order 

(Case No. C-06-3644 (JSW)) 

WEINBERG, ROGER & 

ROSENFELD 

A Professional Corporation 

1001 Marina Village Parkway 

Suite 200 

Alameda, CA 94501-1091 

510.337.1001

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

the Proof of Service has been filed with the Court. 

3. Plaintiffs filed a Request for Entry of Default on August 15, 2006, and the Court 

entered that default against Defendant on August 23, 2006. 

4. Plaintiffs plan on filing a Motion for Default Judgment on or before December 31, 

2006 and will be scheduling a hearing date with the Court for said Motion. 

Therefore, Plaintiffs request that the Court continue the Case Management Conference for 

at least 120 days and vacate the related deadlines. 

Dated: September 22, 2006 

WEINBERG, ROGER & ROSENFELD 

A Professional Corporation 

By: /s/ Linda Baldwin Jones 

 LINDA BALDWIN JONES 

 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

Based upon the foregoing, the Court orders that: 

1. The Case Management Conference date of October 5, 2006 and related deadlines be 

vacated; and 

2. The Case Management Conference be continued for at least 120 days to 

_______________, 2007. 

Dated: 

HONORABLE JEFFREY S. WHITE 

 JUDGE OF THE DISTRICT COURT 

112378/434405 

Case 3:06-cv-03644-JSW Document 8 Filed 09/22/2006 Page 2 of 3

January 12 at 1:30 p.m.

September 27, 2006

Case 3:06-cv-03644-BZ Document 9 Filed 09/27/06 Page 2 of 2