Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cr-00380/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cr-00380-3/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Nina L. Donehue
Defendant
USA
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

CR 07-0380 SI 

SCOTT N. SCHOOLS (SCBN 9990)

United States Attorney

BRIAN J. STRETCH (CASBN 163973)

Chief, Criminal Division

ERIKA R. FRICK (CSBN 208150)

Assistant United States Attorney

450 Golden Gate Avenue, Box 36055

San Francisco, California 94102

Telephone: (415) 436-6973

Facsimile: (415) 436-7234

Email: erika.frick@usdoj.gov

Attorneys for Plaintiff

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

NINA L. DONEHUE,

Defendant.

 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CR 07-0380 SI

[PROPOSED] ORDER AND

STIPULATION SUSPENDING

RESPONSE DATE FOR

GOVERNMENT’S OPPOSITION TO

DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR A BILL

OF PARTICULARS

Date: January 18, 2008

Time: 11:00 a.m.

Courtroom: Honorable Susan Illston

The defendant Nina L. Donehue has filed a Motion for a Bill of Particulars. As set forth

in more detail below, the parties stipulate to suspend the government’s response date for that

motion. 

1. The defendant is charged with embezzling funds from an organization of which

she was an agent, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 666(a)(1)(A). 

2. On November 16, 2007, the parties appeared before your Honor and agreed to a

briefing schedule for the defendant’s Motion for a Bill of Particulars. The defendant filed her

motion on November 29, 2007, and the government’s response to that motion is currently due

Case 3:07-cr-00380-SI Document 22 Filed 12/21/2007 Page 1 of 2 Case 3:07-cr-00380-SI Document 23 Filed 01/08/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

CR 07-0380 SI 2

today, on December 21, 2007. 

3. The parties have since engaged in discussions about the motion. The parties

believe that the motion can be resolved via a letter from the government rather than formal

briefing. At this point, the parties jointly request that the government’s response date of

December 21, 2007, be suspended pending further negotiations by the parties. The parties

expect to be able to provide the Court with further status in early January. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

DATED: _____________________ _____/s/___________________________

ERIKA R. FRICK

Assistant United States Attorney

DATED: _____________________ _____/s/___________________________

 SHAWN HALBERT

Attorney for Nina L. Donehue 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED:_____________________ ________________________________

THE HON. SUSAN ILLSTON

United States District Judge

Case 3:07-cr-00380-SI Document 22 Filed 12/21/2007 Page 2 of 2 Case 3:07-cr-00380-SI Document 23 Filed 01/08/08 Page 2 of 2