Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-15-06846/USCOURTS-ca4-15-06846-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Robert Keith Ross
Appellant
United States of America
Appellee

Document Text:

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-6846

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

ROBERT KEITH ROSS,

 Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Martin K. Reidinger, 

District Judge. (1:07-cr-00117-MR-1; 1:09-cv-00365-MR)

Submitted: October 20, 2015 Decided: October 22, 2015

Before MOTZ, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Robert Keith Ross, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Jill Westmoreland Rose, OFFICE 

OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Asheville, North Carolina, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 15-6846 Doc: 11 Filed: 10/22/2015 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Robert Keith Ross appeals the district court’s order 

construing his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion as a successive 28 

U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion and dismissing it as such. We have 

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, 

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United 

States v. Ross, Nos. 1:07-cr-00117-MR-1; 1:09-cv-00365-MR 

(W.D.N.C. May 11, 2015). We deny Ross’s motion for a 

certificate of appealability. We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented 

in the materials before this court and argument would not aid 

the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Appeal: 15-6846 Doc: 11 Filed: 10/22/2015 Pg: 2 of 2