Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_24-cv-01089/USCOURTS-caed-1_24-cv-01089-2/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Commissioner of Social Security
Defendant
Alison Joy Isbell
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

JONATHAN O. PENA, ESQ. 

CA Bar ID No. 278044

Peña & Bromberg, PLC

3467 W. Shaw Ave., Ste 100

Fresno, CA 93711

Telephone: 559-412-5390

Fax: 866-282-6709

info@jonathanpena.com

Attorney for Plaintiff

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ALISON JOY ISBELL,

Plaintiff,

vs.

CAROLYN COLVIN, ACTING 

COMMISIONER OF SOCIAL 

SECURITY1, 

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 1:24-cv-01089-JLT-BAM

STIPULATION AND |PROPOSED|

ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF 

TIME

Pending the Court’s approval, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and 

between the parties through their respective counsel of record, with the Court’s 

approval, that Plaintiff shall have a 60-day extension of time, from January 10, 

2024 to March 11, 2025, for Plaintiff to serve on defendant with PLAINTIFF’S 

1 Carolyn Colvin became the Commissioner of Social Security on November 30, 

2024. Pursuant to Rule 25(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Carolyn 

Colvin should be substituted for Martin O’Malley as the defendant in this suit. No 

further action need be taken to continue this suit by reason of the last sentence of 

section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).

Case 1:24-cv-01089-JLT-BAM Document 14 Filed 01/02/25 Page 1 of 3
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT. All other dates in the Court’s 

Scheduling Order shall be extended accordingly.

This is Plaintiff’s first request for an extension of time. Plaintiff respectfully 

states that the requested extension is necessary due several merit briefs being due 

on the same week. For the weeks of January 6, 2025 and January 13, 2025, 

Plaintiff’s Counsel has five merit briefs and one reply brief due. Counsel requires 

additional time to brief the issues thoroughly for the Court’s consideration.

Defendant does not oppose the requested extension. Counsel apologizes to the 

Defendant and Court for any inconvenience this may cause. 

Respectfully submitted, 

Dated: December 30, 2024 PENA & BROMBERG, ATTORNEYS AT LAW

By: /s/ Jonathan Omar Pena

JONATHAN OMAR PENA

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

Dated: December 30, 2024 PHILLIP A. TALBERT

United States Attorney

MATHEW W. PILE

Associate General Counsel

Office of Program Litigation

Social Security Administration

By: */s/ Franco L. Becia

Franco L. Becia

Special Assistant United States Attorney

Attorneys for Defendant

(*As authorized by email on December 30, 2024)

Case 1:24-cv-01089-JLT-BAM Document 14 Filed 01/02/25 Page 2 of 3
3

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Pursuant to stipulation, and cause appearing, Plaintiff shall have a 60-day 

extension of time to March 11, 2025, to file a Motion for Summary Judgment. All 

other deadlines in the Court’s Scheduling Order are extended accordingly. No 

further extensions of time will be granted absent a demonstrated showing of good 

cause. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 2, 2025 /s/ Barbara A. McAuliffe _

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:24-cv-01089-JLT-BAM Document 14 Filed 01/02/25 Page 3 of 3