Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-01577/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-01577-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Colorado Carpet Cleaning
Defendant
Maricruz Cornejo
Plaintiff
International Service Cleaners, Inc.
Defendant
Alicia Diaz Negrete
Plaintiff
Magdalena Sanchez
Defendant
Alicia Velasco
Plaintiff
Vesta Inc.
Defendant

Document Text:

___________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Case No. : 2:15−CV−01577−WBS−CKD

[Proposed] Order Re: Stipulation Regarding Amount in Controversy and Remand

-1- 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

PARVIZ DARABI, SBN 209021

DANIEL B. SWERDLIN, SBN 243452

LAW OFFICES OF PARVIZ DARABI

500 Airport Blvd., Suite 150

Burlingame, CA 94010

Telephone: (650) 343-5357

Facsimile: (650) 343-5391

Attorneys for Plaintiffs, 

ALICIA DIAZ NEGRETE, ALICIA VELASCO, and 

MARICRUZ CORNEJO

DYLAN B. CARP, SBN196846

RINA WANG, SBN 269608

JACKSON LEWIS P.C.

50 California Street, 9th Floor

San Francisco, CA 94111

Telephone: (415) 394-9400

Facsimile: (415)394-9401

Attorneys for Defendant

VESTA INC. D/B/A 

COLORADO CARPET CLEANING

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ALICIA DIAZ NEGRETE, an individual, 

ALICIA VELASCO, an individual, 

MARICRUZ CORNEJO, an individual, 

Plaintiffs,

Vs.

VESTA INC., a Colorado Corporation, Which 

Will Do Business In California As 

COLORADO CARPET CLEANING, Also

dba INTERNATIONAL SERVICE 

CLEANERS, INC.; MAGDALENA 

SANCHEZ and DOES 1-30, inclusive, 

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. : 2:15−CV−01577−WBS−CKD

ORDER RE STIPULATION REGARDING 

AMOUNT IN CONTROVERSY AND 

REMAND

Case 2:15-cv-01577-WBS-CKD Document 5 Filed 08/20/15 Page 1 of 2
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Case No. : 2:15−CV−01577−WBS−CKD

[Proposed] Order Re: Stipulation Regarding Amount in Controversy and Remand

-2- 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Based on the Stipulation Regarding Amount in Controversy and Remand of the Parties, that the 

amount in controversy, inclusive of any and all attorneys’ fees through the conclusion of a trial in this 

action, does not exceed $75,000.00, in that Plaintiff stipulates and agrees he cannot recover any 

amount, whether damages, penalties, costs, attorneys’ fees, or any other type of recovery, through time 

of trial in excess of $75,000.00, this matter shall be remanded to Superior Court of California, County 

of Sacramento. Each party will bear it/their own attorney’s fees and costs in connection with the 

removal and this remand. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 20, 2015

Case 2:15-cv-01577-WBS-CKD Document 5 Filed 08/20/15 Page 2 of 2