Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-02528/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-02528-2/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Sacramento County
Defendant
Danielle Macy Steel
Plaintiff
Yolo County
Defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DANIELLE MACY STEEL,

Plaintiff, No. CIV-S-07-2528 LKK EFB PS

vs.

SACRAMENTO COUNTY,

YOLO COUNTY, 

Defendants. ORDER

__________________________________/

On January 10, 2008, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations

herein which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice that any objections to the

findings and recommendations were to be filed within ten days. No objections were filed.

 Accordingly, the court presumes any findings of fact are correct. See Orland v.

United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1999). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are

reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir.

1983).

The court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and, good cause appearing,

concludes that it is appropriate to adopt the proposed Findings and Recommendations in full.

\\\\\

\\\\\

Case 2:07-cv-02528-LKK -EFB Document 14 Filed 02/26/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

 Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that:

1. The proposed Findings and Recommendations filed January 10, 2008, are

ADOPTED; and

2. This action is dismissed without prejudice and the Clerk is directed to close

this case. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); Local Rule 11-110.

DATED: February 25, 2008.

Case 2:07-cv-02528-LKK -EFB Document 14 Filed 02/26/08 Page 2 of 2