Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-01304/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-01304-11/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Josann Ancelet
Plaintiff
Mary A. Chase
Defendant
Henry Craighead
Defendant
District Attorney Technical Services, Ltd
Defendant
Patricia Foronda
Plaintiff
John Q. Lawson
Defendant
Kristy Schwarm
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

----oo0oo----

KRISTY SCHWARM, PATRICIA 

FORONDA, and JOSANN ANCELET,

on behalf of themselves and 

others similarly situated, 

NO. CIV. 05-01304 WBS GGH

Plaintiffs,

v. ORDER

HENRY CRAIGHEAD, an individual,

DISTRICT ATTORNEY TECHNICAL

SERVICES, LTD., a Nevada

Corporation, dba COMPUTER

SUPPORT SERVICES, aka CHECK

RESTITUTION/PROSECUTION PROGRAM,

JOHN Q. LAWSON, an individual,

MARY A. CHASE, an individual;

and DOES 1 through 20,

inclusive,

Defendants.

----oo0oo----

The court presently has plaintiffs and defendant Henry

Craighead’s Motions for Summary Judgment under consideration. 

Plaintiffs’ opposition to Craighead’s Motion for Summary Judgment

is due no later than March 31, 2008 and Craighead’s Reply is due

no later than April 7, 2008. The Final Pretrial Conference is

Case 2:05-cv-01304-WBS -GGH Document 170 Filed 03/27/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

currently set for April 21, 2008 at 2:00 p.m. and the jury trial

is currently set for June 3, 2008 at 9:00 a.m.

Plaintiffs now move ex parte to continue the Final

Pretrial Conference and jury trial dates because the current

schedule provides insufficient time for the parties to prepare

for the Final Pretrial Conference and jury trial in light of this

court’s pending ruling on the parties’ Motions for Summary

Judgment. The court finds that plaintiffs’ inability to prepare

for the Final Pretrial Conference and jury trial without a

resolution to the parties’ Motions for Summary Judgment provides

the requisite good cause to modify this court’s Pretrial

Scheduling Orders. 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Final Pretrial Conference

be continued to June 16, 2008 at 2:00 p.m. and the jury trial be

continued to August 26, 2008 at 9:00 a.m. 

DATED: March 27, 2008

Case 2:05-cv-01304-WBS -GGH Document 170 Filed 03/27/08 Page 2 of 2