Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_08-cv-01212/USCOURTS-cand-3_08-cv-01212-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Chrysler Financial Corporation
Defendant
Rudy Velasquez
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RUDY VELASQUEZ,

Plaintiff,

 v.

CHRYSLER FINANCIAL CORPORATION,

Defendant /

No. C-08-1212 MMC

ORDER DIRECTING DEFENDANT TO

SUBMIT CHAMBERS COPIES IN

COMPLIANCE WITH GENERAL

ORDER 45 AND THE COURT’S

STANDING ORDERS

On May 2, 2008, defendant electronically filed its “Reply to Plaintiff’s Opposition to

Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss” and a “Request for Judicial Notice.” Defendant has

violated General Order 45 and the Court’s Standing Orders, however, by failing to deliver to

the Clerk’s Office “no later than noon on the business day following the day that the papers

are filed electronically, one paper copy of each document that is filed electronically

. . . marked ‘Chambers Copy’ and . . . clearly marked with the judge’s name, case number,

and ‘Chambers Copy-Do Not File.’” See General Order 45 § VI.G; see also Standing

Orders for Civil Cases Assigned to the Honorable Maxine M. Chesney ¶ 2.

Defendant is hereby ORDERED to comply with General Order 45 and the Court’s

Standing Orders by immediately submitting a chambers copy of the above-referenced

documents. Defendant is hereby advised that if it fails in the future to comply with the

Court’s Standing Order to provide a chambers copy of each electronically-filed document,

Case 3:08-cv-01212-MMC Document 12 Filed 05/13/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

the Court may impose sanctions, including, but not limited to, striking from the record any

electronically-filed document of which a chambers copy has not been timely provided to the

Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 13, 2008 

MAXINE M. CHESNEY

United States District Judge

Case 3:08-cv-01212-MMC Document 12 Filed 05/13/08 Page 2 of 2