Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca5-14-11325/USCOURTS-ca5-14-11325-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Rodney Bell
Appellant
United States of America
Appellee

Document Text:

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-11325

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

RODNEY BELL, also known as Black,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeals from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:14-CR-58-1

Before JONES, SOUTHWICK, and COSTA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Rodney Bell has moved for leave to 

withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 

U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Bell

has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant 

portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Bell’s response. We concur 

with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

December 15, 2015

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 14-11325 Document: 00513308164 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/15/2015
No. 14-11325

2

appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is 

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the 

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 14-11325 Document: 00513308164 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/15/2015