Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-00897/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-00897-2/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
California Department of Corrections
Respondent
Frederick Fox
Petitioner

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

FREDERICK FOX, 

Petitioner, No. CIV S-05-0897 MCE KJM P

vs.

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF

CORRECTIONS, et al.,

 Respondents. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS\

 /

A recent court order was served on petitioner’s address of record and returned by

the postal service. It appears that petitioner has failed to comply with Local Rule 83-183(b),

which requires that a party appearing in propria persona inform the court of any address change.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed for

petitioner's failure to keep the court apprised of his current address. See Local Rules 83-183(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty

days after being served with these findings and recommendations, petitioner may file written

objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s

/////

/////

Case 2:05-cv-00897-MCE -KJM Document 8 Filed 02/02/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Findings and Recommendations.” Petitioner is advised that failure to file objections within the

specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951

F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: February 1, 2006.

______________________________________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

/bb

fox0897.133a

Case 2:05-cv-00897-MCE -KJM Document 8 Filed 02/02/06 Page 2 of 2