Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-15-04561/USCOURTS-ca4-15-04561-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Curtis Brockington
Appellant
United States of America
Appellee

Document Text:

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-4561

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

CURTIS BROCKINGTON,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior 

District Judge. (3:07-cr-00438-REP-1)

Submitted: June 14, 2016 Decided: June 16, 2016

Before AGEE, DIAZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Geremy C. Kamens, Acting Federal Public Defender, Patrick L. 

Bryant, Appellate Attorney, Robert J. Wagner, Assistant Federal 

Public Defender, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellant. Dana J. 

Boente, United States Attorney, David T. Maguire, Assistant 

United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 15-4561 Doc: 41 Filed: 06/16/2016 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Curtis Brockington appeals the district court’s judgment

revoking his supervised release and sentencing him to 30 months’ 

imprisonment. Brockington argues that his sentence was plainly 

unreasonable because the district court did not properly weigh 

the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) (2012) factors and failed to explain 

adequately the sentence it imposed. We have reviewed the record 

and conclude that the district court did not err in its 

determination or explanation of Brockington’s sentence. See

United States v. Webb, 738 F.3d 638, 640 (4th Cir. 2013). 

Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Appeal: 15-4561 Doc: 41 Filed: 06/16/2016 Pg: 2 of 2