Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-16-06144/USCOURTS-ca4-16-06144-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Wendell Antonio Johnson
Appellant
United States of America
Appellee

Document Text:

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-6144

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

WENDELL ANTONIO JOHNSON,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Michael F. Urbanski, District 

Judge. (7:04-cr-00128-MFU-1; 7:16-cv-80882-MFU-RSB)

Submitted: June 23, 2016 Decided: June 28, 2016

Before MOTZ, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Wendell Antonio Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. Jean Barrett Hudson, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Charlottesville, Virginia,

Donald Ray Wolthuis, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, 

Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 16-6144 Doc: 5 Filed: 06/28/2016 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Wendell Antonio Johnson seeks to appeal the district 

court’s order dismissing his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion as a 

second or successive 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion filed 

without authorization. On appeal, we confine our review to the 

issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). 

Because Johnson’s informal brief does not challenge the basis 

for the district court’s disposition, Johnson has forfeited

appellate review of the court’s order. Accordingly, we affirm 

the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented 

in the materials before this court and argument would not aid 

the decisional process. 

AFFIRMED

Appeal: 16-6144 Doc: 5 Filed: 06/28/2016 Pg: 2 of 2