Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca5-15-10417/USCOURTS-ca5-15-10417-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Jorge Calderon-Canas
Appellant
United States of America
Appellee

Document Text:

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-10417

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JORGE CALDERON-CANAS, also known as Sobrino, also known as Sottero 

Alanzo Franko, also known as Lucas Vargas Dias,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:13-CR-466-5

Before REAVLEY, ELROD, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Jorge Calderon-Canas has moved 

for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. 

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th 

Cir. 2011). Calderon-Canas has filed a response. The record is not sufficiently 

developed to allow us to make a fair evaluation of Calderon-Canas’s claim of 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

April 20, 2016

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 15-10417 Document: 00513471959 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/20/2016
No. 15-10417

2

ineffective assistance of counsel; we therefore decline to consider the claim

without prejudice to such right to collateral review as Calderon-Canas may 

have. See United States v. Isgar, 739 F.3d 829, 841 (5th Cir. 2014).

We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant parts of the record 

reflected therein, as well as Calderon-Canas’s response. We concur with 

counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for 

appellate review. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, 

counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS 

DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 15-10417 Document: 00513471959 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/20/2016