Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_14-mj-71190/USCOURTS-cand-4_14-mj-71190-2/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Bryan Cochran
Defendant
USA
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ZENIA K. GILG, SBN 171922

Sausalito Plaza

1505 Bridgeway, Suite 106

Sausalito, California, 94965

Telephone: 415.324.7071

Facsimile: 415.324.7071

zenia@jacksonsquarelaw.com

Attorney for Defendant

BRYAN COCHRAN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

BRYAN COCHRAN,

Defendant.

 

Case No. Case No. 4:14-mj-71190-MAG

STIPULATION AND

[Proposed] ORDER TO CONTINUE 

HEARING AND EXCLUDE TIME

UNDER THE SPEEDY TRIAL ACT 

THE PARTIES HEREBY STIPULATE AND AGREE that the hearing presently set for

July 31, 2015, at 9:30 a.m. shall be continued to September 18, 2015 at 9:30 a.m.

Defendant, Bryan Cochran, agrees time is excluded under 18 U.S.C. section 3161(b), and

waived under Fed.Rule Crim. Proc. 5.1( c) and (d).

It is further stipulated and agreed between the parties that the time be excluded until the

requested hearing date on September 18, 2015. The reason for this request is to allow time for

continued discussion between the defense and government attorneys, who are nearly certain to

reach a pre-indictment disposition in this matter. Over the course of the past several months the

parties have exchanged a great deal of information, and have reach consensus on an appropriate

resolution. Counsel for Mr. Cochran, however, would like to analyze the potential impact on his

Stipulation and [Proposed] Order to Continue Preliminary Hearing and Exclude Time under the Speedy Trial Act

Case 4:14-mj-71190-MRGD Document 35 Filed 07/30/15 Page 1 of 2 Case4:14-mj-71190-MAG Document34 Filed07/30/15 Page1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

sentence of the sentencing reform laws now being considered by the United States Congress, and

appear likely to be enacted into law. (See, “Bipartisan Push Builds to Relax Sentencing Laws,”

New York Times, July 28, 2015.) In addition, as defense counsel is scheduled to begin trial in 1

the case of U.S. v. Aedan McDonald et al., Southern District of Iowa 14-cr-0053 on August 24,

2015, it is necessary to continue this matter to mid-September.

 The basis for the exclusion of time under the Speedy Trial Act is to ensure there is

reasonable time necessary for effective representation, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section

3161(h)(7)(B)(iv).

/s/ Kevin James Barry /s/ Zenia K. Gilg 

KEVIN JAMES BARRY ZENIA K. GILG

Assistant U.S. Attorney Attorney for Defendant

Dated: July 30, 2015 Dated: July 30, 2015

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated:

 

Honorable Magistrate Judge

KANDIS WESTMORE

1

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/07/29/us/push-to-scale-back-sentencing-laws-gains-momentum.ht

ml?_r=1&ncid=newsltushpmg00000003

Stipulation and [Proposed] Order to Continue Preliminary Hearing and Exclude Time under the Speedy Trial Act

2

Case4:14-mj-71190-MAG Document34 Filed07/30/15 Page2 of 2

7/30/15

Case 4:14-mj-71190-MRGD Document 35 Filed 07/30/15 Page 2 of 2