Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_03-cv-01694/USCOURTS-caed-2_03-cv-01694-11/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Tom L. Carey
Respondent
Alfred Lee Grayson
Petitioner

Document Text:

1 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

Tim Warriner (SB#166128) 

Attorney at Law 

813 6th St., Suite 450 

Sacramento, CA 95814 

(916) 443-7141 

Attorney for petitioner, 

ALFRED LEE GRAYSON 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTSRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

Alfred Lee Grayson, 

 Petitioner, 

 vs. 

Tom L Carey, Warden, 

 Respondent. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. Civ. S-03-1694 MCE KJM

STIPULATION AND ORDER RE 

BRIEFING SCHEDULE 

 This matter is in the District Court after remand from the 

Ninth Circuit. Pursuant to the remand order, the court is to 

consider the issue of procedural default, and if there is no 

procedural default, is to evaluate the confrontation clause 

claim pursuant to Ohio v. Roberts, 448 U.S. 56 (1980). 

 Respondent filed a response to petitioner’s points and 

authorities on April 19, 2010. Petitioner and respondent, 

through their counsel, hereby stipulate and agree that 

petitioner’s reply points and authorities will be due on June 

19, 2010. 

Case 2:03-cv-01694-MCE-TJB Document 66 Filed 04/29/10 Page 1 of 2
2 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

 DATED: April 26, 2010 /s/ Tim Warriner, Attorney

for Petitioner, Alfred 

Grayson 

 DATED: April 26, 2010 /s/ Janis McLean, Deputy

Attorney General 

 

ORDER

 

 GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, and pursuant to the stipulation of 

the parties, it is hereby ordered that petitioner’s reply points 

and authorities will be due June 19, 2010. 

DATED: April 29, 2010. 

 

Case 2:03-cv-01694-MCE-TJB Document 66 Filed 04/29/10 Page 2 of 2