Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca9-13-16164/USCOURTS-ca9-13-16164-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
First Southern National Bank
Appellant
Sunnyslope Housing LP
Appellee
Sunnyslope Housing Limited Partnership

Document Text:

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

IN THE MATTER OF: SUNNYSLOPE

HOUSING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP,

Debtor,

FIRST SOUTHERN NATIONAL BANK,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

SUNNYSLOPE HOUSING LIMITED

PARTNERSHIP,

Defendant-Appellee.

No. 12-17241

D.C. No.

2:11-cv-02579-

HRH

IN THE MATTER OF: SUNNYSLOPE

HOUSING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP,

Debtor,

SUNNYSLOPE HOUSING LIMITED

PARTNERSHIP,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

FIRST SOUTHERN NATIONAL BANK,

Defendant-Appellee.

No. 12-17327

D.C. No.

2:11-cv-02579-

HRH

 Case: 13-16164, 04/21/2016, ID: 9947827, DktEntry: 60, Page 1 of 3
2 IN THE MATTER OF SUNNYSLOPE HOUSING

IN THE MATTER OF: SUNNYSLOPE

HOUSING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP,

Debtor,

FIRST SOUTHERN NATIONAL BANK,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

SUNNYSLOPE HOUSING LP,

Defendant-Appellee.

No. 13-16164

D.C. No.

2:12-cv-02700-

HRH

IN THE MATTER OF: SUNNYSLOPE

HOUSING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP,

Debtor,

SUNNYSLOPE HOUSING LP,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

FIRST SOUTHERN NATIONAL BANK,

Defendant-Appellee.

No. 13-16180

D.C. No.

2:12-cv-02700-

HRH

ORDER

Filed April 21, 2016

Before: Alex Kozinski, Richard A. Paez,

and Richard R. Clifton, Circuit Judges.

 Case: 13-16164, 04/21/2016, ID: 9947827, DktEntry: 60, Page 2 of 3
IN THE MATTER OF SUNNYSLOPE HOUSING 3

ORDER

The slip opinion filed on April 8, 2016, is hereby

amended as follows:

1. On page 6 of the slip opinion, line 4, change <section

1325(a)(5)(B) of the Code> to <section 1129(b) of the

Code>.

2. On page 11 of the slip opinion, lines 6–7, change

<11 U.S.C. § 1325(a)(5)(B)> to <11 U.S.C. § 1129(b)>.

3. On page 25 of the slip opinion, lines 1–7, change

<Under section 1325(a)(5) of the Code, a plan’s treatment of

a secured claim can be confirmed if one of three conditions

is satisfied: the creditor accepts the plan, the debtor

surrenders the property, or the debtor invokes the cram down

power. Rash, 520 U.S. at 957.> to <Under section 1129(b) of

the Code, a plan can be confirmed even without the consent

of all impaired classes of creditors if the debtor invokes the

cram down power.>.

With these amendments, the petition for panel rehearing

is DENIED as moot. Future petitions for panel rehearing and

rehearing en banc may be filed from this Order.

 Case: 13-16164, 04/21/2016, ID: 9947827, DktEntry: 60, Page 3 of 3