Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-06459/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-06459-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Albert Dytch
Plaintiff
Alicia Guzman
Defendant
Enrique Alejandro Guzman
Defendant
Luz Maria Guzman
Defendant
Los Dos Hermanos
Defendant

Document Text:

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE LAST DATE TO MEET AND CONFER UNDER GENERAL ORDER 56 

AND RELATED DATE; [PROPOSED] ORDER

Page 1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Tanya E. Moore, SBN 206683

Zachary M. Best, SBN 166035

MISSION LAW FIRM, A.P.C.

332 North Second Street

San Jose, California 95112

Telephone (408) 298-2000

Facsimile (408) 298-6046

Email: service@mission.legal

Attorneys for Plaintiff

Albert Dytch

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ALBERT DYTCH,

Plaintiff,

vs.

ENRIQUE ALEJANDRO GUZMAN dba 

LOS DOS HERMANOS, et al.,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. 3:16-cv-06459-MMC

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE LAST 

DATE TO MEET AND CONFER UNDER 

GENERAL ORDER 56 AND RELATED 

DATE; [PROPOSED] ORDER

WHEREAS, on November 4, 2016, the Court issued a Scheduling Order for Cases 

Asserting Denial of Right of Access under the Americans with Disabilities Act (Dkt. 4) (“the 

Scheduling Order”);

WHEREAS, the joint site inspection required pursuant to General Order 56 and the 

Scheduling Order took place on December 19, 2016;

WHEREAS, the Scheduling Order requires that the parties, and their counsel, meet and 

confer in person no later than 28 days after the joint site inspection, here, January 16, 2017;

WHEREAS, it is Plaintiff’s position that the December 19, 2016 joint site inspection 

did not meet the in-person meet and confer requirement of General Order 56 as Plaintiff 

himself was not present. Plaintiff has now provided Defendants a list of all conditions he 

Case 3:16-cv-06459-MMC Document 12 Filed 01/18/17 Page 1 of 3
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE LAST DATE TO MEET AND CONFER UNDER GENERAL ORDER 56 

AND RELATED DATE; [PROPOSED] ORDER

Page 2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

asserts are non-compliant at the subject property and for which he seeks injunctive relief, as 

well as his proposed non-monetary terms of settlement. The parties are working together to 

resolve any questions or disputes and, once the injunctive relief has been tentatively agreed 

upon, Plaintiff will promptly provide his monetary demand as required by General Order 56.

WHEREAS, defense counsel asserts that the meet and confer obligation was met as her 

clients and CASP consultant attended and met with Plaintiffs’ counsel and CASP consultant. 

Defendants do not agree that a second in person meet and confer is necessary. Defense counsel 

asserts that since the consultants and parties are currently negotiating the resolution of the 

repair items to obviate the need for an action; it is unnecessary to hold a second meet and 

confer especially here where Plaintiff’s counsel is not prepared to provide defendants with a 

monetary demand. 

WHEREAS, the parties have agreed that the meet and confer may take place on 

February 28, 2017 at 11:00 a.m. or a stipulated date agreed upon by the parties on or before 

March 17, 2017 in the event the meet and confer cannot take place as currently scheduled (to 

avoid the filing of repeated stipulations which wastes the parties’ resource, and more 

importantly, the court’s time);

NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby stipulated by and between Plaintiff, Albert Dytch,

and Defendants, Enrique Alejandro Guzman dba Los Dos Hermanos, Luz Maria Guzman dba 

Los Dos Hermanos, and Alicia Guzman through their respective counsel, that the meet and 

confer required under General Order 56 and this Court’s Scheduling Order take place on 

February 28, 2017 at 11:00 a.m., or a stipulated date agreed upon the parties on or before 

March 17, 2017. 

IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED that if a settlement of the matter is not reached at the 

meet and confer, that Plaintiff shall file a Notice of Need for Mediation within 14 days of the 

meet and confer.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Case 3:16-cv-06459-MMC Document 12 Filed 01/18/17 Page 2 of 3
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE LAST DATE TO MEET AND CONFER UNDER GENERAL ORDER 56 

AND RELATED DATE; [PROPOSED] ORDER

Page 3

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Dated: January 17, 2017 MISSION LAW FIRM, A.P.C.

/s/ Tanya E. Moore 

Tanya E. Moore 

Attorneys for Plaintiff,

Albert Dytch

Dated: January 17, 2017 GHANTOUS LAW CORPORATION

/s/ Karyne T. Ghantous

Karyne T. Ghantous

Attorneys for Defendants,

Enrique Alejandro Guzman dba Los Dos 

Hermanos, Luz Maria Guzman dba Los Dos 

Hermanos, and Alicia Guzman

ATTESTATION

Concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from each of the individual(s) 

whose electronic signature is attributed above.

/s/ Tanya E. Moore 

Tanya E. Moore 

Attorneys for Plaintiff

Albert Dytch

ORDER

The parties having so stipulated and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the in person meet and confer required by this 

Court’s Scheduling Order and General Order 56 shall take place no later than ________.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if the parties are unable to reach a settlement of 

this matter at the in person meet and confer, Plaintiff shall file a Notice of Need for Mediation 

within 14 days of the meet and confer.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: 

United States Senior District Judge

March 17, 2017 ^

January 18, 2017

Case 3:16-cv-06459-MMC Document 12 Filed 01/18/17 Page 3 of 3