Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-08-06572/USCOURTS-ca4-08-06572-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Anthony Lamar Snipe
Appellant
United States of America
Appellee

Document Text:

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-6572

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

ANTHONY LAMAR SNIPE,

Defendant - Appellant.

No. 08-6774

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

ANTHONY LAMAR SNIPE,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Charleston. Patrick Michael Duffy, District

Judge. (2:02-cr-00833-PMD-1)

Submitted: September 16, 2008 Decided: September 22, 2008

Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Appeal: 08-6572 Doc: 14 Filed: 09/22/2008 Pg: 1 of 3
2

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Anthony Lamar Snipe, Appellant Pro Se. John Charles Duane, Eric

John Klumb, Assistant United States Attorneys, Charleston, South

Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 08-6572 Doc: 14 Filed: 09/22/2008 Pg: 2 of 3
3

PER CURIAM:

In these consolidated cases, Anthony Lamar Snipe appeals

the district court’s orders denying his motion for a reduction in

sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2000), his request for a

reduction in sentence based on substantial assistance, 18 U.S.C.

§ 3553(e) (2000), and his motion for reconsideration. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United

States v. Snipe, No. 2:02-cr-00833-PMD-1 (D.S.C. Mar. 27, 2008,

Apr. 16, 2008, & Apr. 29, 2008). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Appeal: 08-6572 Doc: 14 Filed: 09/22/2008 Pg: 3 of 3