Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-01222/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-01222-3/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Richard Kirkland
Respondent
Ramiro Gonzalez Ruiz
Petitioner

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RAMIRO GONZALEZ RUIZ, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

v. )

)

RICHARD KIRKLAND, WARDEN, )

)

Respondent. )

 )

1:05-cv-01222-REC-DLB-HC

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS (Doc. 8)

ORDER DISMISSING PETITION

FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO

ENTER JUDGMENT

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a

Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. 

On February 27, 2006, the Magistrate Judge filed Findings and

Recommendations that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus be

DISMISSED, without prejudice, as a successive petition. These

Findings and Recommendations were served on all parties and

contained notice that any objections were to be filed within thirty

(30) days from the date of service of that order. On March 22,

2006, Petitioner filed objections to the Findings and

Recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636

(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a de novo review of the case. 

Case 1:05-cv-01222-REC-DLB Document 10 Filed 04/10/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Having carefully reviewed the entire file, including Petitioner's

objections, the Court concludes that the Magistrate Judge's

Findings and Recommendations are supported by the record and proper

analysis. Petitioner's objections present no grounds for

questioning the Magistrate Judge's analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed February 27,

2006, are ADOPTED IN FULL; 

2. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DISMISSED,

without prejudice, as a successive petition; and,

3. The Clerk of Court enter judgment.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 7, 2006 /s/ Robert E. Coyle 

668554 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:05-cv-01222-REC-DLB Document 10 Filed 04/10/06 Page 2 of 2