Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-01053/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-01053-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Robert L. King
Petitioner
Paul Schultz
Respondent

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ROBERT L. KING,

Petitioner, 

vs.

PAUL SCHULTZ,

Respondent. 

 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

) 

1:05-CV-01053-OWW-DLB-HC

ORDER TO SUBMIT NEW APPLICATION

TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

AND CERTIFIED COPY OF TRUST

ACCOUNT STATEMENT OR PAY

FILING FEE

Petitioner, a federal prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a petition for a writ of habeas

corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 together with an application to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant

to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. However, petitioner’s application to proceed in forma pauperis did not include the

required original signature by an authorized officer of the institution of incarceration. Additionally,

petitioner has not filed a certified copy of his prison trust account statement for the six month period

immediately preceding the filing of the petition. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2). Petitioner will be provided

the opportunity to submit a new application to proceed in forma pauperis and a certified copy of his trust

account statement or pay the $5.00 filing fee.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Clerk’s Office shall send to petitioner the form for application to proceed in forma

pauperis.

2. Within thirty days of the date of service of this order, petitioner shall submit a

completed application to proceed in forma pauperis and a certified copy of his prison trust account

Case 1:05-cv-01053-OWW -DLB Document 4 Filed 10/05/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

statement for the six month period immediately preceding the filing of the petition, or in the alternative,

pay the $5.00 filing fee for this action. Failure to comply with this order will result in a recommendation

that this action be dismissed.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: October 5, 2005 /s/ Dennis L. Beck 

ah0l4d UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:05-cv-01053-OWW -DLB Document 4 Filed 10/05/05 Page 2 of 2