Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-06432/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-06432-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Andre Johnson
Petitioner
James Yates
Respondent

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ANDRE JOHNSON, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

)

v. )

)

)

JAMES YATES, Warden, )

)

Respondent. )

 )

1:04-cv-06432 AWI TAG HC 

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

(Doc. 6)

ORDER DISMISSING PETITION FOR WRIT

OF HABEAS CORPUS

(Doc. 1)

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO

ENTER JUDGMENT

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. 

On March 1, 2005, the Magistrate Judge assigned to the case filed Findings and

Recommendations recommending that the petition for writ of habeas corpus be DISMISSED because

the Petition was not filed within the one-year time period provided for in 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(1),

and because the Petition is successive. (Doc. 6). The Findings and Recommendations were served

on all parties and contained notice that any objections were to be filed within ten (10) days from the

date of service of that order. On March 17, 2005, Petitioner filed objections to the Magistrate

Case 1:04-cv-06432-AWI-TAG Document 8 Filed 04/21/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Judge's Findings and Recommendations. (Doc. 7). 

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a de

novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, including Petitioner's objections,

the Court concludes that the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations are supported by the

record and proper analysis. Petitioner's objections present no grounds for questioning the Magistrate

Judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations issued March 1, 2005, (Doc. 6) are ADOPTED IN

FULL; 

2. The petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. 1) is Dismissed; and

3. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to ENTER JUDGMENT for Respondent and close the

file.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 20, 2005 /s/ Anthony W. Ishii 

0m8i78 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:04-cv-06432-AWI-TAG Document 8 Filed 04/21/05 Page 2 of 2