Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-01014/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-01014-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Mike Brown
Defendant
California Highway Patrol
Defendant
Sergeant Costa
Defendant
Joe Farrow
Defendant
Barbara Fogarty
Plaintiff
State of California
Defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Stipulation

1

BILL LOCKYER

Attorney General of the State of California

JACOB A. APPELSMITH

Senior Assistant Attorney General

BARBARA J. SEIDMAN

Supervising Deputy Attorney General

SCOTT H. WYCKOFF, State Bar No. 191367

Deputy Attorney General

1300 I Street, Suite 125

P.O. Box 944255

Sacramento, CA 94244-2550

Telephone: (916) 324-5335

Fax: (916) 324-5567

Email: Scott.Wyckoff@doj.ca.gov

Attorneys for Defendants California Highway Patrol,

Sergeant Costa, Commissioner Mike Brown and Joe

Farrow

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BARBARA FOGARTY,

Plaintiff,

v.

STATE OF CALIFORNIA, CALIFORNIA

HIGHWAY PATROL, SERGEANT COSTA,

COMMISSIONER MIKE BROWN, JOE

FARROW, DOES 1 through 20, inclusive,

Defendants.

Case No.: 

2:06-CV-01014-WBS-PAN

[JFM]

STIPULATION TO

CONTINUE HEARING ON

MOTION AND STATUS

(PRETRIAL SCHEDULING)

CONFERENCE

Courtroom: 5 

Judge: The Honorable

William B. Shubb

Plaintiff, Barbara Fogarty and defendants State of California, Sergeant Costa, Commissioner

Mike Brown, and Joe Farrow, by and through their respective counsel of record, stipulate as

follows:

1. The parties have previously stipulated, and the Court has ordered, that Defendants’

Motion to Dismiss, Motion for More Definite Statement, and Motion to Strike be continued to

Case 2:06-cv-01014-WBS-EFB Document 11 Filed 08/16/06 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Stipulation

2

September 5, 2006, at 9:00 a.m. in Courtroom No. 5, from August 21, 2006. The reasons for the

stipulation was the unavailability of plaintiff’s counsel. 

2. The parties have further stipulated, and the Court has further ordered, that Status

(Pretrial Scheduling) Conference be continued to September 11, 2006, at 9:00 a.m.

3. Plaintiff’s counsel has a trial in a separate matter that is set to begin on September 5,

2006, at 8:30 a.m. in Department 47 of the Sacramento Superior Court entitled Russell v. Runge. 

This case has been continued twice and cannot be changed. The trial is expected to last

approximately ten days.

4. Due to this scheduling conflict, counsel for the respective parties stipulate to continue

defendants’ motion to September 18, 2006, at 1:30 p.m.

5. The parties further stipulate that the Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference be

continued to October 10, 2006, at 9:00 a.m.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

LAW OFFICES OF JILL TELFER

Dated: August 14, 2006 By: /S/ 

JILL TELFER

Attorneys for Plaintiff Barbara Fogarty

Dated: August 14, 2006 BILL LOCKYER

Attorney General of the State of California

By: /S/ 

SCOTT H. WYCKOFF

Deputy Attorney General 

Attorneys for Defendants California Highway Patrol,

Sergeant Costa, Commissioner Mike Brown and Joe

Farrow

/ / /

/ / /

/ / /

Case 2:06-cv-01014-WBS-EFB Document 11 Filed 08/16/06 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Stipulation

3

The Court having considered the parties’ stipulation, and good cause appearing, IT IS

HEREBY ORDERED that the Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss, Motion for More Definite

Statement, and Motion to Strike is continued to September 18, at 1:30 p.m., in Courtroom No. 5. 

IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED that the Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference

is continued to October 10, 2006, at 9:00 a.m. in Courtroom No. 5.

Dated: August 15, 2006

fogarty.wpd

SA2006101860

Case 2:06-cv-01014-WBS-EFB Document 11 Filed 08/16/06 Page 3 of 3