Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_09-cv-02668/USCOURTS-cand-3_09-cv-02668-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Commissioner of Social Security
Defendant
Daniel Rodriguez
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DANIEL RODRIGUEZ,

Plaintiff,

 v.

MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of

Social Security

Defendant

 /

No. C 09-2668 MMC

ORDER DIRECTING DEFENDANT TO

SERVE UPON PLAINTIFF

ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD AND TO

FILE PROOF OF SERVICE THEREOF;

SETTING DEADLINE FOR PLAINTIFF

TO FILE MOTION FOR SUMMARY

JUDGMENT

In this action, plaintiff Daniel Rodriguez, proceeding pro se, seeks judicial review of a

decision of the Social Security Administration, specifically, a decision of an administrative

law judge dated February 23, 2007.

On December 16, 2009, defendant filed three documents: (1) an answer to plaintiff’s

complaint; (2) a two-page “Notice of Filing Social Security Administrative Transcript”; and

(3) a certified copy of the administrative transcript, which transcript is 75 pages in length.

On December 17, 2009, defendant filed a proof of service in which defendant stated

that he had served plaintiff with the “Answer, and Manual Filing Notification of Administrative

Transcript,” which documents appear to be references to the first two of the abovedescribed three documents filed by defendant on December 16, 2009. The proof of service

does not indicate that defendant served the administrative transcript upon plaintiff.

Case 3:09-cv-02668-MMC Document 18 Filed 01/28/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Accordingly, defendant is hereby DIRECTED to serve plaintiff, no later than February

5, 2010, with a copy of the administrative record, and to file, no later than February 5, 2010,

proof of such service.

Further, plaintiff is hereby DIRECTED to file, no later than March 12, 2010, a motion

for summary judgment. In such motion, plaintiff shall set forth all arguments in support of

his position that the administrative law judge’s decision of February 23, 2007 is erroneous. 

The Court hereby informs plaintiff that a failure to file a motion for summary judgment may

result in dismissal of the above-titled action for failure to prosecute.

The deadline for defendant to file an opposition to plaintiff’s motion for summary

judgment or a counter-motion, as well as the deadline for plaintiff to file a reply thereto,

remain as set forth in the Procedural Order for Social Security Review Actions, filed June

16, 2009. Specifically, defendant shall file opposition or a counter-motion within 30 days of

the date of service of plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, and plaintiff shall file any reply

within 14 days of the date of service of defendant’s opposition or counter-motion.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 28, 2010 

MAXINE M. CHESNEY

United States District Judge

Case 3:09-cv-02668-MMC Document 18 Filed 01/28/10 Page 2 of 2