Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-03824/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-03824-11/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Apple Inc
Defendant
Uriel Marcus
Plaintiff
Benedict Verceles
Plaintiff

Document Text:

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

URIEL MARCUS and BENEDICT

VERCELES, on behalf of others similarly

situated,

Plaintiffs,

 v.

APPLE INC,

Defendant. /

No. C 14-03824 WHA

ORDER RE PLAINTIFFS’

SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING

Plaintiffs’ filing, which was due at noon today, is a duplicate of what plaintiff filed two

weeks ago (Dkt. No. 64). This violated the Court’s clear order. Plaintiff shall file a proper

response to the requests for supplemental briefing (Dkt. Nos. 60–62) by FIVE P.M. TODAY

(California time).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 16, 2015. 

WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:14-cv-03824-WHA Document 65 Filed 03/16/15 Page 1 of 1