Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-15-06172/USCOURTS-ca4-15-06172-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Robin Virginia Meadows Collins
Appellant
H. M. Edwards
Appellee
Pat Green
Appellee
Elliott Pannell
Appellee

Document Text:

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-6172

ROBIN VIRGINIA MEADOWS COLLINS, 

 Plaintiff - Appellant, 

v. 

PAT GREEN; ELLIOTT PANNELL; H. M. EDWARDS, 

 Defendants - Appellees. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever, III, 

Chief District Judge. (5:14-ct-03111-D) 

Submitted: June 18, 2015 Decided: June 22, 2015

Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. 

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Robin Virginia Meadows Collins, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 

Appeal: 15-6172 Doc: 13 Filed: 06/22/2015 Pg: 1 of 2
PER CURIAM: 

Robin Virginia Meadows Collins seeks to appeal the district 

court’s order dismissing without prejudice her civil rights 

action under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1) (2012) for failure to state 

a claim on which relief may be granted. This court may exercise 

jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), 

and certain interlocutory and collateral orders. 28 U.S.C. 

§ 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. 

Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-47 (1949). Because the 

deficiencies identified by the district court may be remedied by 

the filing of an amended complaint, we conclude that the order 

Collins seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an 

appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Domino Sugar 

Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392, 10 F.3d 1064, 1066-67 

(4th Cir. 1993). 

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of 

jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts 

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process. 

DISMISSED

2

Appeal: 15-6172 Doc: 13 Filed: 06/22/2015 Pg: 2 of 2