Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_06-cv-03767/USCOURTS-cand-4_06-cv-03767-12/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
M:Metrics, Inc.
Counter-claimant
Telephia, Inc.
Counter-defendant

Document Text:

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE:

BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND HEARING

CASE NO.: C 06 3767 SBA (BZ) 

TERRY KEARNEY, State Bar No. 160054

MICHAEL B. LEVIN, State Bar No. 172329 

CHRISTOPHER R. PARRY, State Bar No. 209858 

WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI 

Professional Corporation 

650 Page Mill Road 

Palo Alto, CA 94304-1050 

Telephone: (650) 493-9300 

Facsimile: (650) 565-5100 

Email: mlevin@wsgr.com 

Attorneys for Defendant 

M:METRICS, INC. 

DARIN W. SNYDER, State Bar No. 136003 

BRIAN BERLINER, State Bar No. 156732 

ERIC J. KNAPP, State Bar No. 214352 

MICHAEL SAPOZNIKOW, State Bar No. 242640 

O'MELVENY & MYERS LLP 

Embarcadero Center West 

275 Battery Street 

San Francisco, CA 94111-3305 

Telephone: (415) 984-8700 

Facsimile: (415) 984-8701 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

TELEPHIA, INC. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

OAKLAND DIVISION 

TELEPHIA, INC., a Delaware corporation 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

M:METRICS, INC., a Delaware corporation 

Defendant. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

)

CASE NO.: C 06 3767 SBA (BZ) 

 

JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER 

RE: BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND 

HEARING FOR M:METRICS’ 

MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY 

JUDGMENT 

AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIM. ) 

) 

I. BACKGROUND 

On June 13, 2007, M:Metrics filed a motion seeking partial summary judgment that the 

current version of its Meter Client software does not infringe Telephia’s U.S. Patent No. 6,745,011 

(“the ‘011 patent”) (Docket No. 110). 

Case 4:06-cv-03767-SBA Document 138 Filed 08/21/07 Page 1 of 4
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE:

BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND HEARING

CASE NO.: C 06 3767 SBA (BZ) 

Under the current briefing schedule, Telephia’s opposition brief is due on August 21, 2007 

and M:Metrics’ Reply Brief is due on August 28, 2007. A hearing on M:Metrics’ motion is 

currently scheduled for September 11, 2007. 

Telephia intends to submit a declaration from its technical expert, Dr. Thomas Conte, in 

support of its opposition brief. M:Metrics seeks to depose Dr. Conte on his declaration before 

M:Metrics submits its reply brief. Under the current briefing schedule, M:Metrics does not have 

sufficient time to depose Dr. Conte before its reply brief is due. 

On July 26, 2007, M:Metrics filed a motion to change time, requesting that the Court move 

up the due date for Telephia’s opposition brief. Telephia opposed M:Metrics’ motion, arguing 

that instead the parties should continue the date for the summary judgment hearing. The Court 

denied M:Metrics’ motion to change the due date for Telephia’s opposition brief. 

After the Court’s ruling, counsel for M:Metrics contacted counsel for Telephia proposing 

that the parties stipulate to extend the briefing schedule and hearing date on M:Metrics’ Motion 

for Partial Summary Judgment so that M:Metrics would have sufficient opportunity to take Dr. 

Conte’s deposition. Counsel for Telephia has agreed to that request. 

II. STIPULATION 

Therefore, the parties jointly request and stipulate that the Court enter the following order 

extending the briefing schedule and hearing date as follows: 

(1) Telephia’s opposition brief is due August 28, 2007; 

(2) M:Metrics’ reply brief is due September 18, 2007; 

(3) The hearing on M:Metrics’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Docket No. 

110) shall be rescheduled from September 11, 2007 to October 2, 2007. 

Case 4:06-cv-03767-SBA Document 138 Filed 08/21/07 Page 2 of 4
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE:

BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND HEARING

CASE NO.: C 06 3767 SBA (BZ) 

SO STIPULATED.

Dated: August 10, 2007 WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI 

By: /s/ 

Christopher Parry 

Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant 

M:METRICS. INC. 

Dated: August 10, 2007 O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP 

By: /s/ 

Eric J. Knapp 

Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterdefendant, 

TELEPHIA, INC. 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

___________ 

Dated: 8/17/07 By: 

 Hon. Saundra Brown Armstrong 

 United States District Judge 

 

Case 4:06-cv-03767-SBA Document 138 Filed 08/21/07 Page 3 of 4
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE:

BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND HEARING

CASE NO.: C 06 3767 SBA (BZ) 

Attestation Pursuant to General Order 45.X 

I, Christopher Parry, hereby attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has 

been obtained from each of the signatories. 

Dated: August 10, 2007 By: /s/ 

 Christopher Parry 

 

 

Case 4:06-cv-03767-SBA Document 138 Filed 08/21/07 Page 4 of 4