Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-08-01903/USCOURTS-ca4-08-01903-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Coldwell Banker
Appellee
David M. Kissi
Appellant
David Muchow
Appellee

Document Text:

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-1903

DAVID M. KISSI,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

COLDWELL BANKER; DAVID MUCHOW,

Defendants - Appellees.

No. 08-1904

DAVID M. KISSI,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

DK&R CHAPTER 7 ESTATE, AMMENDABLE TRUST; RICHARD M. KREMEN; 

DLA PIPER OF BALTIMORE, MD; RICHARD E. GREENBERG,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the District 

of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, Senior District 

Judge. (8:08-cv-01593-PJM; 8:08-cv-01663-PJM)

Submitted: March 30, 2010 Decided: April 2, 2010

Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and SHEDD Circuit Judges.

Appeal: 08-1903 Doc: 32 Filed: 04/02/2010 Pg: 1 of 3
2

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

David M. Kissi, Appellant Pro Se. Kimberly Anne Manuelides, 

SAUL EWING, LLP, Baltimore, Maryland; James Patrick Ulwick, 

KRAMON & GRAHAM, PA, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 08-1903 Doc: 32 Filed: 04/02/2010 Pg: 2 of 3
3

PER CURIAM:

In these consolidated appeals, David Kissi appeals 

from two orders entered by the district court for Northern 

District of Ohio transferring his cases to the district court 

for the District of Maryland. Because appeals from those orders 

must be filed in the Sixth Circuit, which has already issued an 

opinion dismissing one of these appeals, we dismiss the appeals 

for lack of jurisdiction. See 28 U.S.C. § 1294 (2006). 

Further, we decline to transfer the appeals to the 

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit as we do not find that 

such a transfer is in the interest of justice. See 28 U.S.C. 

§ 1631 (2006). Accordingly, we deny Kissi’s motion for 

appointment of counsel and dismiss the appeals. We dispense 

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before the court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Appeal: 08-1903 Doc: 32 Filed: 04/02/2010 Pg: 3 of 3