Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_18-cv-07176/USCOURTS-cand-3_18-cv-07176-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Commissioner of Social Secuity
Defendant
Annaliese Ke Sherry
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

United States District Court 

Northern District of Californi

a

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

ANNALIESE KE SHERRY,

Plaintiff, 

v. 

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECUITY, 

Defendant. 

Case No. 18-cv-07176-JCS 

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY 

CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED 

FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE 

This action for review of an administrative record is governed by Rule 16-5 of this Court’s 

Civil Local Rules, which provides that a plaintiff must file a motion for summary judgment within 

twenty-eight days of receipt of the defendant’s answer. The parties stipulated to an extension of 

time to file their briefs, which the Court granted, setting a deadline of May 17, 2019 for Plaintiff to 

file a motion for summary judgment. That deadline has passed and Plaintiff has not filed a motion 

for summary judgment or made any further request for an extension. Plaintiff is therefore 

ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why this case should not be DISMISSED for failure to prosecute. 

Plaintiff shall file a response to this order no later than June 14, 2019. Her response must either 

include her motion for summary judgment or explain why she needs additional time. If no 

response is filed by that deadline, the case will be dismissed and Plaintiff’s counsel may be 

referred to the Court’s Standing Committee on Professional Conduct for further action. See Civil 

Local Rule 11-6(c). 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: May 30, 2019 

______________________________________ 

JOSEPH C. SPERO 

Chief Magistrate Judge 

Case 3:18-cv-07176-JCS Document 18 Filed 05/30/19 Page 1 of 1