Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_08-cv-00084/USCOURTS-caed-1_08-cv-00084-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Commissioner of Social Security
Defendant
Seng Yang
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

 SENG YANG, ) 1:08-cv-00084 LJO GSA

)

) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

)

)

Plaintiff, )

)

 vs. )

)

MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of )

Social Security, )

) 

Defendant. )

____________________________________)

On January 15, 2008, Plaintiff filed the present action in this Court. Plaintiff seeks review of

the Commissioner’s denial of his application for benefits. On January 16, 2008, the Court issued a

Scheduling Order. The Scheduling Order states that within 120 days after service, Defendant shall

file and serve a copy of the administrative record which shall be deemed an answer to the complaint. 

On May 9, 2008, Plaintiff filed a proof of service. According to the proof of service, on May

8, 2008, Plaintiff served, in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(i), the Summons,

Civil Cover Sheet, Complaint for Review of the Final Decision of the Commissioner of the Social

Security Administration, and Consent by certified mail to the following:

1. Office of the U.S. Attorney, 2500 Tulare Street, Suite 4401, Fresno, CA 93721;

2. Office of the Attorney General, Department of Justice, 10 and Pennsylvania, NW, th

Washington, DC 20530; and

Case 1:08-cv-00084-GSA Document 10 Filed 10/14/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 2

3. Commissioner of Social Security, Office of General Counsel, SSA, 6401 Security

Building, Baltimore, MD 21235.

Pursuant to the Scheduling Order, Defendant was required to file and serve a copy of the

administrative record on or about September 5, 2008. As of the date of this Order, Defendant has

failed to file the administrative record and the parties have not stipulated to an extension of time for

such filing.

Therefore, Defendant is ordered to show cause why sanctions should not be imposed for

failure to comply with the January 16, 2008, Scheduling Order. Defendant is ORDERED to file a

written response to this Order to Show Cause WITHIN twenty (20) days of the date of this Order. 

Failure to respond to this Order to Show Cause within the time specified may result in the

imposition of sanctions. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: October 10, 2008 /s/ Gary S. Austin 

6i0kij UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:08-cv-00084-GSA Document 10 Filed 10/14/08 Page 2 of 2