Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01742/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01742-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
David Brewer
Respondent
Bonifacio Carlos-Tofolla
Petitioner

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BONIFACIO CARLOS-TOFOLLA,

Petitioner,

v.

DAVID BREWER,

Respondent.

No. 2:22-cv-01742-DB

ORDER AND FINDINGS & 

RECOMMENDATIONS

By order filed March 19, 2024, petitioner’s was directed to submit within thirty-days an 

affidavit in support of his motion for IFP or the appropriate filing fee. Thirty days from that date 

have now passed, and plaintiff has not responded to the court’s order.

In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is 

directed to assign a district judge to this case; and

IT IS RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 

110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 

after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections 

with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned 

“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that 

Case 2:22-cv-01742-DAD-SCR Document 6 Filed 06/07/24 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District 

Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 

Dated: June 6, 2024

DB16

DB/Prisoner/Habeas/R/carl1742.fta.no.dj

Case 2:22-cv-01742-DAD-SCR Document 6 Filed 06/07/24 Page 2 of 2