Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_18-cv-02815/USCOURTS-cand-4_18-cv-02815-6/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Michael Fridman
Plaintiff
Danny Gesel Reznik Fridman
Plaintiff
Jake Lechner
Plaintiff
Portier, LLC
Defendant
Rasier, LLC
Defendant
Uber Technologies, Inc.
Defendant

Document Text:

STIP. AND ORDER REGARDING MTS BRIEFING SCHEDULE 

CASE NO. 4:18-CV-02815-HSG 

sf-3956051

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

David S. Ratner, Esq. (SBN 316267) 

David Ratner Law Firm, LLP 

david@davidratnerlawfirm.com 

33 Julianne Court 

Walnut Creek, CA 94595 

Telephone: (917) 900-2868 

Facsimile: (925) 891-3818 

Attorney for Plaintiffs and the Classes 

[Additional counsel appearing on signature page] 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

MICHAEL FRIDMAN, DANNY GESEL

REZNIK FRIDMAN, and JAKE LECHNER,

individually and on behalf of all others similarly 

situated, 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., a Delaware 

corporation, RASIER, LLC, a Delaware limited 

liability company, and PORTIER, LLC, a 

Delaware limited liability company, 

Defendants. 

Case No. 4:18-cv-02815-HSG 

STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING 

BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR DEFENDANTS’ 

MOTION TO STAY 

Judge: Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. 

Case 4:18-cv-02815-HSG Document 62 Filed 10/30/18 Page 1 of 5
1 

STIP. AND ORDER REGARDING MTS BRIEFING SCHEDULE 

CASE NO. 4:18-CV-02815-HSG 

sf-3956051 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Plaintiffs Michael Fridman, Danny Gesel Reznik Fridman, and Jake Lechner 

(“Plaintiffs”) and Defendants Uber Technologies, Inc., Rasier, LC, and Portier, LLC 

(“Defendants”) stipulate and agree as follows, and request entry of the below proposed order 

approving their stipulation. 

WHEREAS, on September 14, 2018, Defendants filed a Motion to Compel Arbitration as 

to Plaintiffs Michael Fridman and Danny Gesel Reznik Fridman, and to Stay the Action, 

Including Jake Lechner’s Claim, and noticed a hearing on the motion for December 20, 2018 

(Dkt. No. 49); 

WHEREAS, the parties appeared for a Case Management Conference in this case on 

October 23, 2018; 

WHEREAS, on October 23, 2018, the Court issued a minute entry stating that “no case 

schedule will be set until a motion to stay has been e-filed and resolved by the Court,” and that 

“the parties are encouraged to meet and confer to discuss stipulating to an expedited briefing 

schedule” on Defendants’ anticipated Motion to Stay the Proceedings pending a decision on 

Defendants’ September 14, 2018 Motion to Compel Arbitration and to Stay the Action (Dkt. No. 

60); 

WHEREAS, pursuant to the Court’s direction, the parties have met and conferred 

regarding an expedited briefing schedule on Defendants’ Motion to Stay the Proceedings 

pending resolution of Defendants’ Motion to Compel Arbitration and Stay the Action. 

Case 4:18-cv-02815-HSG Document 62 Filed 10/30/18 Page 2 of 5
2 

STIP. AND ORDER REGARDING MTS BRIEFING SCHEDULE 

CASE NO. 4:18-CV-02815-HSG 

sf-3956051 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION 

THEREFORE, the parties hereby stipulate to and request entry of the following briefing 

schedule on Defendants’ motion to stay: 

Filing/Event Deadline 

Defendants’ Motion to Stay the Proceedings October 31, 2018 

Plaintiffs’ Opposition to Defendants’ Motion 

to Stay the Proceedings 

November 9, 2018 

Defendants’ Reply in Support of Their Motion 

to Stay the Proceedings 

November 16, 2018 

Hearing on Defendants’ Motion to Stay the 

Proceedings 

If the Court believes it would be helpful to set 

a hearing on this motion, the parties request 

that the Court set a hearing date at the Court’s 

earliest convenience. 

Dated: October 29, 2018 Respectfully submitted, 

 

 By: /s/ David S. Ratner 

David S. Ratner, Esq. (SBN 316267) 

David Ratner Law Firm, LLP 

33 Julianne Court 

Walnut Creek, CA 94595 

Telephone: (917) 900-2868 

Fax: (925) 891-3818 

Email: david@davidratnerlawfirm.com 

Avi R. Kaufman* 

Kaufman P.A. 

400 NW 26th Street 

Miami, Florida 33127 

Telephone: (305) 469-5881 

Email: kaufman@kaufmanpa.com 

Case 4:18-cv-02815-HSG Document 62 Filed 10/30/18 Page 3 of 5
3 

STIP. AND ORDER REGARDING MTS BRIEFING SCHEDULE 

CASE NO. 4:18-CV-02815-HSG 

sf-3956051 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Stefan Coleman* 

Law Offices of Stefan Coleman, P.A. 

201 South Biscayne Blvd, 28th Floor 

Miami, Florida 33131 

Telephone: (877) 333-9427 

Fax: (888) 498-8946 

Email: law@stefancoleman.com 

Counsel for Plaintiffs Fridman, Reznik, and Lechner, 

and all others similarly situated 

*Admitted pro hac vice 

Dated: October 29, 2018 By: /s/ Tiffany Cheung 

Tiffany Cheung 

Lucia X. Roibal 

Morrison & Foerster LLP 

425 Market Street 

San Francisco, California 94105 

Telephone: (415) 268-7315 

Facsimile: (415) 268-7522 

tcheung@mofo.com 

lroibal@mofo.com 

 Adam J. Hunt, pro hac vice 

Morrison & Foerster LLP 

250 West 55th Street 

New York, New York 10019-9601 

Telephone: (212) 336-4341 

Facsimile: (212) 468-7900 

AdamHunt@mofo.com 

Attorneys for Defendants Uber Technologies, Inc., 

Rasier, LLC, and Portier, LLC 

Case 4:18-cv-02815-HSG Document 62 Filed 10/30/18 Page 4 of 5
4 

STIP. AND ORDER REGARDING MTS BRIEFING SCHEDULE 

CASE NO. 4:18-CV-02815-HSG 

sf-3956051 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ATTESTATION 

I, Tiffany Cheung, am the ECF user whose identification and password are being used to 

file this Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Regarding Briefing Schedule for Defendants’ Motion 

to Stay. I attest under penalty of perjury that concurrence in this filing has been obtained from 

all signatories above. 

Dated: October 29, 2018 /s/ Tiffany Cheung 

ORDER 

This matter is before the Court on the Parties’ Stipulation and [Proposed] Order 

Regarding Briefing Schedule for Defendants’ Motion to Stay. The Court, having considered the 

parties’ Stipulation, adopts the following briefing schedule on Defendants’ motion to stay: 

Filing/Event Deadline 

Defendants’ Motion to Stay the Proceedings October 31, 2018 

Plaintiffs’ Opposition to Defendants’ Motion 

to Stay the Proceedings 

November 9, 2018 

Defendants’ Reply in Support of Their Motion 

to Stay the Proceedings 

November 16, 2018 

Hearing on Defendants’ Motion to Stay the 

Proceedings 

If the Court believes it would be helpful to set 

a hearing on this motion, the parties request 

that the Court set a hearing date at the Court’s 

earliest convenience. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: October 30, 2018 __________________________________ 

Honorable Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. 

United States District Judge 

Case 4:18-cv-02815-HSG Document 62 Filed 10/30/18 Page 5 of 5