Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-02325/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-02325-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
John Marshall
Respondent
Elex M. Washington
Petitioner

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ELEX M. WASHINGTON,

Petitioner, No. CIV S-05-2325 MCE DAD P

vs.

JOHN MARSHALL, Warden.

Respondent. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

By order filed November 3, 2006, petitioner’s application was dismissed and

thirty days’ leave to file an amended application was granted. The thirty day period has now

expired, and petitioner has not filed an amended application or otherwise responded to the

court’s order.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed

without prejudice. See Local Rule 11-110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty

days after being served with these findings and recommendations, petitioner may file written

objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s

Findings and Recommendations.” Petitioner is advised that failure to file objections within the

Case 2:05-cv-02325-MCE -DAD Document 6 Filed 12/14/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951

F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: December 13, 2006.

DAD:lg

wash2325.fta

Case 2:05-cv-02325-MCE -DAD Document 6 Filed 12/14/06 Page 2 of 2