Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_19-cv-04032/USCOURTS-cand-3_19-cv-04032-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Pivotal Systems Corporation
Defendant
Hari Prasad Sarda
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATED DISMISSAL WITH 

PREJUDICE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER Case No.: 3:19-cv-04032-MMC 

J. CURTIS EDMONDSON (CSB No. 236105) 

jcedmondson@edmolaw.com 

Edmondson IP Law 

Venture Commerce Center 

3699 NE John Olsen Avenue 

Hillsboro, OR 72124 

Telephone: (503) 336-3749 

Facsimile: (503) 482-7418 

Kumar Maheshwari (SBN 245010) 

Mahesh Law Group 

7700 Irvine center drive, Suite 800, 

Irvine, CA 92618 

PH: (530) 400-9246 

email: kumar@maheshlaw.com

www.maheshlaw.com 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

HARI PRASAD SARDA 

LAURENCE F. PULGRAM (CSB No. 115163) 

lpulgram@fenwick.com 

TODD R. GREGORIAN (CSB No. 236096) 

tgregorian@fenwick.com 

FENWICK & WEST LLP 

555 California Street, 12th Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94104 

Telephone: 415.875.2300 

Facsimile: 415.281.1350 

Attorneys for Defendant 

PIVOTAL SYSTEMS CORPORATION 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

HARI PRASAD SARDA, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

PIVOTAL SYSTEMS CORPORATION, 

Defendant. 

Case No.: 3:19-cv-04032-MMC 

JOINT STIPULATION TO DISMISS 

WITH PREJUDICE AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER 

Case 3:19-cv-04032-MMC Document 18 Filed 11/15/19 Page 1 of 4
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 STIPULATION DISMISSAL WITH 

PREJUDICE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER Case No.: 3:19-cv-04032-MMC 

WHEREAS, Plaintiff Hari Prasad Sarda filed his Complaint in this action on July 14, 

2019; and 

WHEREAS, Plaintiff and Defendant Pivotal Systems Corporation settled this matter on or 

about November 7, 2019; 

THEREFORE, it is hereby STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff and Defendant 

through their designated counsel that the above-captioned action should be dismissed with 

prejudice pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). The parties further stipulate that, except as set forth 

in the Settlement Agreement between them, the parties shall bear their own attorney’s fees, 

expenses and costs. 

This Court shall retain jurisdiction for a period of one year to enforce the terms of the 

Settlement Agreement. 

/// 

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

Dated: November 13, 2019 Mahesh Law Group, PC 

By: /s/Kumar Maheshwari 

Kumar Maheshwari 

Attorney for Plaintiff 

HARI PRASAD SARDA 

Dated: November 13, 2019 FENWICK & WEST LLP 

By: /s/ Todd Gregorian 

Laurence F. Pulgram 

Todd R. Gregorian 

Attorneys for Defendant 

PIVOTAL SYSTEMS CORPORATION 

 

Case 3:19-cv-04032-MMC Document 18 Filed 11/15/19 Page 2 of 4
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 STIPULATION DISMISSAL WITH 

PREJUDICE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER Case No.: 3:19-cv-04032-MMC 

ATTESTATION 

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), counsel for Hari Prasad Sarda has obtained the 

concurrence of Pivotal Systems Corporation’s counsel in the filing of this joint request. 

Dated: November 13, 2019 Mahesh Law Group, PC 

By: /s/Kumar Maheshwari 

Kumar Maheshwari 

Attorney for Plaintiff 

HARI PRASAD SARDA 

 

Case 3:19-cv-04032-MMC Document 18 Filed 11/15/19 Page 3 of 4
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 STIPULATION DISMISSAL WITH 

PREJUDICE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER Case No.: 3:19-cv-04032-MMC 

ORDER 

The Court having considered the stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing 

therefor, orders as follows: 

1. The action is dismissed with prejudice as against Defendant Pivotal System

Corporation pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1)(A)(ii).

2. Each party shall bear their own costs and attorneys’ fees, except as set forth in the

Settlement Agreement.

3. The Court shall retain jurisdiction over this matter to enforce the terms of the

November 7, 2019 Settlement Agreement.

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: ______________________________ By: _________________________________ 

United States District Judge 

Maxine M Chesney 

 , for a period of one year from the date of

this order.

November 15, 2019 _______________________________

United States District Judge

M i M Ch

Case 3:19-cv-04032-MMC Document 18 Filed 11/15/19 Page 4 of 4