Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_15-cv-01538/USCOURTS-caed-1_15-cv-01538-2/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Brighthouse Networks, LLC
Defendant
April Dyer
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

On March 9, 2016, Plaintiff filed a notice of voluntary dismissal of the entire action. (Doc. 9) 

The notice relies upon Fed.R.Civ.P. 41 which permits the plaintiff to dismiss the action without the 

Court’s intervention upon “(i) a notice of dismissal before the opposing party serves either an answer 

or a motion for summary judgment.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A). Once such a notice has been filed, 

an order of the Court is not required for the dismissal. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(ii); Wilson v. City of 

San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997). 

No other party has appeared in this action. Thus, the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to close 

this action in light of the notice of dismissal without prejudice filed and properly signed pursuant to 

Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 10, 2016 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

APRIL DYER,

 Plaintiff,

v.

BRIGHTHOUSE NETWORKS, LLC.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: 1:15-cv-01538 --- JLT 

ORDER CLOSING CASE

Case 1:15-cv-01538-JLT Document 10 Filed 03/10/16 Page 1 of 1