Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_24-cv-02062/USCOURTS-caed-2_24-cv-02062-3/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Miguel A. Alvarez
Plaintiff
T. McKean
Defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MIGUEL A. ALVAREZ,

Plaintiff,

v.

T. MCKEAN,

Defendant.

No. 2:24-cv-2062 CKD P

ORDER AND 

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

On September 25, 2024, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed with leave to amend. In that 

order, plaintiff was warned that failure to file an amended complaint would result in a 

recommendation that this action be dismissed. The amended complaint was due on October 25, 

2024, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court assign a district 

court judge to this case.

IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See

Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 

after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections 

with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings 

Case 2:24-cv-02062-DJC-CKD Document 12 Filed 11/08/24 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified 

time waives the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th 

Cir. 1991).

Dated: 11/08/24

1

alva2062.fta

_____________________________________

CAROLYN K. DELANEY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:24-cv-02062-DJC-CKD Document 12 Filed 11/08/24 Page 2 of 2