Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_09-cv-05587/USCOURTS-cand-4_09-cv-05587-3/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Depomed, Inc.
Counter-defendant
Lupin Limited
Counter-claimant
Lupin Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Counter-claimant

Document Text:

MCDERMOTT 

WILL 

& EMERY LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SILICON VALLEY

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

DM_US 26401615-1.082221.0015 STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING HEARING 

DATE AND BRIEFING SCHEDULE RE M/AMEND

CASE NO. 09-CV-05587 PJH

MCDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP 

WILLIAM G. GAEDE, III (136184) 

wgaede@mwe.com 

TERRANCE P. MCMAHON (071910) 

tmcmahon@mwe.com 

ANDREW A. KUMAMOTO (178541) 

akumamoto@mwe.com 

275 Middlefield Road, Suite 100 

Menlo Park, CA 94025 

Telephone: (650) 815-7400 

Facsimile: (650) 815-7401 

Attorneys for Depomed, Inc. 

RAKOCZY MOLINO MAZZOCHI SIWIK LLP 

PAUL J. MOLINO (Pro Hac Vice) 

paul@rmmslegal.com 

WILLIAM A. RAKOCZY (Pro Hac Vice) 

wrakoczy@rmmslegal.com 

THEODORE J. CHIACCHO (Pro Hac Vice) 

tchiacchio@rmmslegal.com 

HEINZ J. SALMEN (Pro Hac Vice) 

hsalmen@rmmslegal.com 

6 West Hubbard Street, Suite 500 

Chicago, IL 60654 

Telephone: (312) 527-2157 

Facsimile: (312) 222-6320 

DURIE TANGRI LLP 

DARALYN DURIE (169825) 

ddurie@durietangri.com 

SONALI MAITRA (254896) 

smaitra@durietangri.com 

332 Pine Street, Suite 200 

San Francisco, CA 94104 

Telephone: (415) 362-6666 

Facsimile: (415) 236-6300 

Attorneys for Lupin Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and 

Lupin Ltd. 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

IN AND FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

DEPOMED, INC., a California 

Corporation, 

Plaintiff, 

 v. 

LUPIN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., a 

Virginia Corporation, and LUPIN 

LIMITED, an Indian Corporation, 

Defendants. 

No. 09-CV-05587 PJH 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

RESCHEDULING HEARING DATE AND

BRIEFING SCHEDULE OF PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND

COMPLAINT TO DISMISS WITHOUT

PREJUDICE PLAINTIFF’S SECOND

CAUSE OF ACTION AND DEFENDANT’S

COUNTERCLAIMS AND AFFIRMATIVE

DEFENSES RELATED TO U.S. PATENT

NO. 6,723,340 

Case 4:09-cv-05587-PJH Document 62 Filed 08/20/10 Page 1 of 3
MCDERMOTT 

WILL 

& EMERY LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SILICON VALLEY

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

DM_US 26401615-1.082221.0015 1 

STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING HEARING 

DATE AND BRIEFING SCHEDULE RE M/AMEND

CASE NO. 09-CV-05587 PJH

WHEREAS, Plaintiff filed a Motion to Amend the Complaint and Dismiss Without 

Prejudice Plaintiff’s Second Cause of Action, Defendants’ Third and Fourth Counterclaims and 

Defendants’ Second, Third, Fourth and Fifth Affirmative Defenses Related to U.S. Patent No. 

6,723,340 on August 2, 2010; 

WHEREAS, the hearing on Plaintiff’s above-referenced motion is presently set for 

September 8, 2010, at 9:00 in Courtroom 3 of the above-referenced Court; 

WHEREAS, Defendants’ opposition and Plaintiff’s reply memorandum are presently due 

August 18, 2010, and August 25, 2010, respectively; 

WHEREAS, due to scheduling conflict on Plaintiff’s part, counsel has conferred and 

agreed that the hearing date should be rescheduled to September 15, 2010, and the briefing 

schedule amended; 

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties hereto, through their 

respective counsel, as follows: 

1. The date on which Plaintiff’s Motion to Amend the Complaint and Dismiss 

Without Prejudice Plaintiff’s Second Cause of Action, Defendants’ Third and Fourth 

Counterclaims and Defendants’ Second, Third, Fourth and Fifth Affirmative Defenses Related to 

U.S. Patent No. 6,723,340 be heard be rescheduled to September 15, 2010, at 9:00a.m. in 

Courtroom 3 before the Honorable Phyllis J. Hamilton; 

2. The date for filing Defendants’ opposition be extended to August 25, 2010; and 

3. The date for filing Plaintiff’s reply be extended to September 1, 2010. 

SO STIPULATED this 18th day of August 2010. 

MCDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP RAKOCZY MOLINO MAZZOCHI SIWIK LLP 

By: /s/ William G. Gaede, III By: /s/ Paul J. Molino 

 William G. Gaede, III Paul J. Molino 

Attorneys for Depomed, Inc. Attorneys for Lupin Limited and 

 Lupin Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Case 4:09-cv-05587-PJH Document 62 Filed 08/20/10 Page 2 of 3
MCDERMOTT 

WILL 

& EMERY LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SILICON VALLEY

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

DM_US 26401615-1.082221.0015 2 

STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING HEARING 

DATE AND BRIEFING SCHEDULE RE M/AMEND

CASE NO. 09-CV-05587 PJH

SIGNATURE ATTESTATION 

 Pursuant to General Order 45.X(B), I hereby attest that concurrence has been obtained 

from Paul Molino indicated by a “conformed” signature (/s/) within this e-filed document. 

 

/s/ William G. Gaede, III William G. Gaede, III 

-oOoPURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: HONORABLE PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON 

United States District Court Judge 

8/20/10

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton

Case 4:09-cv-05587-PJH Document 62 Filed 08/20/10 Page 3 of 3