Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-alsd-1_16-cv-00053/USCOURTS-alsd-1_16-cv-00053-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Alan Allbritten
Plaintiff
Bishop State Community College
Defendant

Document Text:

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

ALAN ALLBRITTEN, :

Plaintiff, :

v. : CA 16-00053-CG-C

BISHOP STATE 

COMMUNITY COLLEGE, :

Defendant. :

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This matter has been referred to the undersigned in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 

§ 636(b)(1). The Plaintiff initiated this action on February 3, 2016 claiming that he is 

“owed unpaid overtime compensation, in excess of $50,000.00, pursuant to violations of 

the Fair Labor Standards Act.” (Doc. 1 at 2). On April 21, 2016, the Defendant filed the 

Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 8) requesting this Court to dismiss this action under Rules 

12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. On May 19, 2016, Steven 

L. Terry, counsel for the Plaintiff, informed the Court via telephone that the Motion to 

Dismiss is well taken and that the Plaintiff does not oppose the dismissal of this action. 

The undersigned must first determine whether the Court has jurisdiction to hear 

this action and, thus, will begin by considering the Defendant’s FED. R. CIV. P. 12(b)(1) 

argument. Upon consideration of the Motion to Dismiss, the undersigned finds that the

Defendant, as an arm of the state, is entitled to Eleventh Amendment sovereign 

immunity from this suit brought pursuant to the Fair Labor Standards Act. See Cardwell 

v. Auburn Univ. Montgomery, 941 F. Supp. 2d 1322, 1327-28 (M.D. Ala. 2013) (holding 

that Auburn University Montgomery is an arm of the state and enjoys sovereign 

immunity under the Eleventh Amendment); Morris v. Wallace Cmty. College-Selma, 125 F. 

Case 1:16-cv-00053-CG-C Document 14 Filed 05/23/16 Page 1 of 3
2

Supp. 2d 1315, 1335-36 (S.D. Ala. 2001) (holding that the George Wallace Community 

College is an arm of the state and is entitled to Eleventh Amendment immunity); 

Stallworth v. Ala. Dep’t of Mental Health & Mental Retardation, 801 F. Supp. 2d 1231, 1233 

(M.D. Ala. 2011) (citing Powell v. Fla., 132 F.3d 677, 678 (11th Cir. 1998) (“The Eleventh 

Circuit has held that a state is entitled to immunity against private suits for damages 

brought pursuant to the FLSA.”). Therefore, the undersigned finds that this Court does 

not have subject matter jurisdiction to hear this action and the Motion to Dismiss should 

be granted pursuant to FED. R. CIV. P. 12(b)(1). Accordingly, it is not necessary for the 

undersigned to address the Defendant’s FED. R. CIV. P. 12(b)(6) argument, and it is

RECOMMENDED that the Court GRANT the Motion to Dismiss and DISMISS this 

action pursuant to FED. R. CIV. P. 12(b)(1).

NOTICE OF RIGHT TO FILE OBJECTIONS

A copy of this Report and Recommendation shall be served on all parties in the 

manner provided by law. Any party who objects to this recommendation or anything 

in it must, within fourteen (14) days of the date of service of this document, file specific 

written objections with the Clerk of this Court. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); FED. R. CIV. P. 

72(b); S.D. Ala. GenLR 72(c)(1) & (2). The parties should note that under Eleventh 

Circuit Rule 3-1, “[a] party failing to object to a magistrate judge’s findings or 

recommendations contained in a report and recommendation in accordance with the 

provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) waives the right to challenge on appeal the district 

court’s order based on unobjected-to factual and legal conclusions if the party was 

informed of the time period for objecting and the consequences on appeal for failing to 

object. In the absence of a proper objection, however, the court may review on appeal 

for plain error if necessary in the interests of justice.” 11th Cir. R. 3-1. In order to be 

specific, an objection must identify the specific finding or recommendation to which 

Case 1:16-cv-00053-CG-C Document 14 Filed 05/23/16 Page 2 of 3
3

objection is made, state the basis for the objection, and specify the place in the 

Magistrate Judge’s report and recommendation where the disputed determination is 

found. An objection that merely incorporates by reference or refers to the briefing 

before the Magistrate Judge is not specific.

DONE this the 23rd day of May 2016.

s/WILLIAM E. CASSADY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:16-cv-00053-CG-C Document 14 Filed 05/23/16 Page 3 of 3