Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cr-00675/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cr-00675-2/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Ricardo A. Castillo
Defendant
USA
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER 1

CR 05-0675 SI

KEVIN V. RYAN (CSBN 118321)

United States Attorney

EUMI L. CHOI (WVBN 0722)

Chief, Criminal Division

NAHLA RAJAN (CSBN 218838)

Special Assistant United States Attorney

450 Golden Gate Avenue, Box 36055

San Francisco, California 94102-3495

Telephone: (415) 436-6838

FAX: (415) 436-7234

Attorneys for Plaintiff

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

RICARDO A. CASTILLO,

aka Carlos Sanchez Mendoza,

Defendant.

 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CR 05-0675 SI

[PROPOSED] ORDER AND

STIPULATION EXCLUDING TIME

FROM THE SPEEDY TRIAL ACT

CALCULATION 

(18 U.S.C. § 3161 (h)(8)(A))

The parties stipulate and agree, and the Court finds and holds, as follows:

1. The parties initially appeared on the instant matter January 31, 2006 for defendant’s

arraignment on the indictment before the Honorable Joseph C. Spero.

2. On January 31, 2006, the matter was continued until February 17, 2006 for initial

appearance before the Honorable Susan Illston. On February 17, 2006, the matter was continued

to March 24, 2006. On March 24, 2006, the matter was again continued to April 21, 2006.

3. On March 24, 2006, Assistant Public Defender Steven Kalar, who represents the

defendant, requested an exclusion of time from March 24, 2006 to April 21, 2006, based on

effective preparation of counsel. The parties moved that this same time period be excluded from

Case 3:05-cr-00675-SI Document 12 Filed 03/30/2006 Page 1 of 2
 Case 3:05-cr-00675-SI Document 13 Filed 04/03/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER 2

CR 05-0675 SI

the calculation of time under the Speedy Trial Act.

3. In light of the foregoing facts, the failure to grant the requested exclusion would

unreasonably deny counsel for the defense the reasonable time necessary for effective

preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. See 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(A),

(B)(iv). The ends of justice would be served by the Court excluding the proposed time period. 

These ends outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. See id. §

3161(h)(8)(A).

4. For the reasons stated, the time period from March 24, 2006 through April 21, 2006

shall be excluded from the calculation of time under the Speedy Trial Act.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

DATED: _____________ Respectfully Submitted,

 /S/ 

NAHLA RAJAN

Special Assistant United States Attorney

DATED: _______________ /S/ 

STEVEN KALAR

Counsel for Ricardo A. Castillo

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: _________________________ ____________________________________

HONORABLE SUSAN ILLSTON

United States District Judge

Case 3:05-cr-00675-SI Document 12 Filed 03/30/2006 Page 2 of 2
 Case 3:05-cr-00675-SI Document 13 Filed 04/03/06 Page 2 of 2