Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-00034/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-00034-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Austin Freight Systems, Inc.
Defendant
Crain Walnut Shelling, Inc.
Plaintiff
Hill Country Bakery, LLC
Defendant

Document Text:

1

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

HAYNES AND BOONE, LLP

Kenneth G. Parker (Bar No. 182911)

 kenneth.parker@haynesboone.com

Christopher B. Maciel (Bar No. 300733)

 christopher.maciel@haynesboone.com

600 Anton Blvd., Suite 700

Costa Mesa, California 92626

Telephone: (949) 202-3014

Facsimile: (949) 202-3114

Attorneys for Defendant

Hill Country Bakery, LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – SACRAMENTO DIVISION

CRAIN WALNUT SHELLING,

INC., a California corporation,

Plaintiff,

vs.

HILL COUNTRY BAKERY, LLC, 

a Texas limited liability company;

AUSTIN FREIGHT SYSTEMS, 

INC., a Texas corporation; and 

DOES 1 through 30, inclusive,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 2:15−CV−00034−GEB−CMK

ASSIGNED TO: 

The Honorable Garland E. Burrell, Jr.

JOINT MOTION AND 

STIPULATION TO EXTEND

DEFENDANTS’ TIME TO 

RESPOND TO INITIAL 

COMPLAINT 

Defendants’ Current Response Date: 

March 12, 2015 

Case 2:15-cv-00034-GEB-CMK Document 10 Filed 03/11/15 Page 1 of 4
2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WHEREAS, Plaintiff CRAIN WALNUT SHELLING, INC. 

(“Plaintiff”) filed a Complaint in the within action on October 17, 2014;

WHEREAS, HILL COUNTRY BAKERY, LLC and AUSTIN 

FREIGHT SYSTEMS, INC. (collectively “Defendants”) filed Notice of Removal 

on January 6, 2015, making their response to Plaintiff’s initial Complaint due on or 

before January 13, 2015;

WHEREAS, the parties agreed that Defendants shall have through and 

including March 12, 2015, to respond to Plaintiff’s initial Complaint;

WHEREAS, on February 4, 2015, Plaintiff’s insurer filed a 

subrogation action against Defendants, which Defendants removed on March 4, 

2015 and which is pending Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. of this Court as 

Nationwide Agribusiness Insurance Company v. Hill Country Bakery et al., Case 

No. 2:15-CV-00488-MCE-CMK (the “Subrogation Action”);

WHEREAS, one or more of the parties will file a Notice of Related 

Case regarding the Subrogation Action; 

WHEREAS, the parties desire to pursue settlement discussion of this 

action and the Subrogation Action and also to set response dates that are the same 

dates; and

WHEREAS, the parties have agreed that both Defendants may have 

additional time to respond to the initial Complaint to enable the parties to further 

discuss the merits of their respective claims and defenses and the potential to 

resolve this action without the need for further litigation;

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED between the parties, 

by and through their counsel of record, and the parties hereby move this Court, as 

necessary, for an order providing, that Defendants shall have through and including 

April 3, 2015, to respond to Plaintiff’s initial Complaint.

///

///

Case 2:15-cv-00034-GEB-CMK Document 10 Filed 03/11/15 Page 2 of 4
3

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DATED: March 10, 2015 HAYNES AND BOONE, LLP

Kenneth G. Parker

By: /s/ Kenneth G. Parker

Kenneth G. Parker

Attorneys for Defendant

Hill Country Bakery, LLC

MAIRE BURGEES & DEEDON

Patrick L. Deedon

By: /s/ Patrick L. Deedon 

Patrick L. Deedon

Attorneys for Defendant

Austin Freight Systems, Inc.

(as authorized on March 10, 2015)

 CARR, KENNEDY, PETERSON & FROST

Robert M. Harding

By: /s/ Robert M. Harding

Robert M. Harding

Attorneys for Plaintiff

Crain Walnut Shelling, Inc.

(as authorized on March 10, 2015)

Case 2:15-cv-00034-GEB-CMK Document 10 Filed 03/11/15 Page 3 of 4
4

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

PROPOSED ORDER

The Court having reviewed the foregoing Stipulation, orders that both 

Defendants shall have through and including April 3, 2015, to respond to 

Plaintiff’s initial Complaint.

Dated: March 10, 2015

Case 2:15-cv-00034-GEB-CMK Document 10 Filed 03/11/15 Page 4 of 4