Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-01780/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-01780-2/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
City of Alameda
Defendant
James M. Flint
Defendant
Edward Levine
Plaintiff
Jeffrey Wohl
Mediator

Document Text:

-1-

Levine v. City of Alameda (Case No. C-04-01780 CRB/ADR) 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: EXT. OF FILING DATES FOR MOTIONS FOR ATTYS’ 

FEES, BILLS OF COST AND NOTICES OF APPEAL 

 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

ROGER A. CARNAGEY (SBN 79005)

Attorney at Law 

One Kaiser Plaza, Suite 601 

Oakland, CA 94612 

(510) 452-5005 

(510) 451-2944 (fax) 

Attorney for Plaintiff 

EDWARD LEVINE 

LINDA A. TRIPOLI (SBN 100389) 

Attorney at Law 

One Blackfield Drive, No. 403 

Tiburon, California 94920 

Telephone: (415) 380-8822 

Fax: (415) 380-8868 

Attorneys for Defendants 

CITY OF ALAMEDA and 

JAMES M. FLINT 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

EDWARD LEVINE, 

 Plaintiff, 

 vs. 

CITY OF ALAMEDA,, et al. a California 

Charter City, and JAMES M. FLINT, both 

individually and as City Manager for the City of 

Alameda, 

 Defendants. 

Case No. C-04-01780 CRB / ADR 

DECLARATION, STIPULATION AND 

[PROPOSED] ORDER RE: EXTENSION 

OF FILING DATES FOR MOTIONS FOR 

ATTORNEYS’ FEES, BILLS OF COST 

AND NOTICES OF APPEAL [Northern 

District Civil Local Rule 6-2] 

 DECLARATION OF LINDA A. TRIPOLI

I, LINDA A. TRIPOLI, hereby declare as follows: 

1. I am the attorney of record for Defendants in this action. 

Case 3:04-cv-01780-CRB Document 81 Filed 01/24/06 Page 1 of 3
-2-

Levine v. City of Alameda (Case No. C-04-01780 CRB/ADR) 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: EXT. OF FILING DATES FOR MOTIONS FOR ATTYS’ 

FEES, BILLS OF COST AND NOTICES OF APPEAL 

 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2. Roger Carnagey, Counsel for Plaintiff and I have discussed the Court’s January 

12, 2006 Memorandum and Order re: Cross Motions for Summary Judgment and Judgment and 

agree that we each have questions about aspects of the Memorandum and Order which we 

believe will be able to be addressed at the February 10, 2006 Status Conference. 

3. Mr. Carnagey and I have discussed and agree that after the February 10, 2006 

Status Conference, it may be in the parties’ mutual interest to continue in Court-sponsored 

mediation with Jeffrey Wohl, who previously conducted a mediation with the parties in this case 

on April 5, 2005. 

4. Mr. Carnagey and I have also discussed and agree that it is prudent and beneficial 

that neither party incur additional attorneys’ fees in moving for attorneys’ fees or in preparing 

and filing bills of costs until at least after the February 10, 2006 Status Conference and until after 

the parties participate in further mediation if mutually deemed advisable after said Status 

Conference. 

5. Mr. Carnagey and I have also discussed and agree that it is prudent and beneficial 

that neither party incur additional attorneys’ fees in filing respective notices of appeal until after 

the February 10, 2006 Status Conference and, if possible, until at least after the parties 

participate in further mediation if mutually deemed advisable after said Status Conference. 

6. There have been no prior extensions of time with regard to the filing of motions 

for attorneys’ fees, bills of costs or notices of appeal. 

7. This proposed extension of time will somewhat delay the hearing of the motions 

for attorneys’ fees and any objections to bills of cost as well as the commencement of any 

appeals. However, this proposed extension of time will not delay the pending Status Conference 

and there are no other scheduled hearings or proceedings in this case. 

 I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed this 

23rd day of January, 2006 at Tiburon, California. 

 /S/ 

 LINDA TRIPOLI 

Case 3:04-cv-01780-CRB Document 81 Filed 01/24/06 Page 2 of 3
-3-

Levine v. City of Alameda (Case No. C-04-01780 CRB/ADR) 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: EXT. OF FILING DATES FOR MOTIONS FOR ATTYS’ 

FEES, BILLS OF COST AND NOTICES OF APPEAL 

 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 STIPULATION

In accordance with the accompanying Declaration of Linda A. Tripoli, the parties hereby 

stipulate, by and through their respective counsel, that the date for the filing of respective 

motions for attorneys fees and bills of costs shall be extended from January 26, 2006 until the 

later of the two following dates: 

1) February 24, 2006 which is fourteen days after the February 10, 2006 Status 

Conference before Judge Breyer, or 

2) Fourteen days after completion of mediation provided the parties voluntarily agree, 

prior to February 24, 2006, to continue mediation with Jeffrey Wohl. 

In addition, the parties hereby stipulate, by and through their respective counsel, that the 

date for the filing of respective notices of appeal shall be extended from February 13, 2006 until 

March 15, 2006. 

It is so stipulated. 

Date: January 23, 2006 _________/S/________________________ 

ROGER A. CARNAGEY 

Attorney for Plaintiff 

EDWARD LEVINE 

Date: January 23, 2006 _________/S/________________________ 

LINDA A. TRIPOLI 

Attorney for Defendants 

City of Alameda and James M. Flint 

 ORDER

Good cause appearing, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Date: January , 2006 _________________________________ 

CHARLES R. BREYER 

United States District Court Judge 

24

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Charles R. Breyer

Case 3:04-cv-01780-CRB Document 81 Filed 01/24/06 Page 3 of 3