Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ared-5_16-cv-00078/USCOURTS-ared-5_16-cv-00078-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Dallas County Detention Center
Defendant
Ontario Moseley
Plaintiff
Warren Police Department
Defendant

Document Text:

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS

PINE BLUFF DIVISION

ONTARIO MOSELEY PLAINTIFF

v. 5:16CV00078-KGB-JTK

WARREN POLICE DEPARTMENT, et al. DEFENDANTS

PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

INSTRUCTIONS

The following recommended disposition has been sent to United States District Judge Kristine

G. Baker. Any party may serve and file written objections to this recommendation. Objections should

be specific and should include the factual or legal basis for the objection. If the objection is to a factual

finding, specifically identify that finding and the evidence that supports your objection. An original

and one copy of your objections must be received in the office of the United States District Court Clerk

no later than fourteen (14) days from the date of the findings and recommendations. The copy will be

furnished to the opposing party. Failure to file timely objections may result in waiver of the right to

appeal questions of fact.

If you are objecting to the recommendation and also desire to submit new, different, or

additional evidence, and to have a hearing for this purpose before the District Judge, you must, at the

same time that you file your written objections, include the following:

1. Why the record made before the Magistrate Judge is inadequate.

2. Why the evidence proffered at the hearing before the District Judge (if such a 

hearing is granted) was not offered at the hearing before the Magistrate Judge. 

 

3. The detail of any testimony desired to be introduced at the hearing before the District

Judge in the form of an offer of proof, and a copy, or the original, of any documentary or other non1

Case 5:16-cv-00078-KGB Document 4 Filed 04/19/16 Page 1 of 3
testimonial evidence desired to be introduced at the hearing before the District Judge.

From this submission, the District Judge will determine the necessity for an additional

evidentiary hearing, either before the Magistrate Judge or before the District Judge.

Mail your objections and “Statement of Necessity” to:

Clerk, United States District Court

Eastern District of Arkansas

600 West Capitol Avenue, Suite A149

Little Rock, AR 72201-3325

DISPOSITION

Plaintiff Moseley is an inmate confined at the Dallas County Detention Center, who filed this

pro se 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action without paying the $400 filing fee or filing a complete Motion to

Proceed in forma pauperis (ifp). 

He has not responded to the Court’s March 17, 2016 Order, directing him to pay the filing fee

or file an ifp within thirty days (Doc. No. 3). Therefore, pursuant to Local Rule 5.5(c)(2), his

complaint should be dismissed without prejudice, for failure to prosecute.1

 Accordingly, 

IT IS, THEREFORE, RECOMMENDED that Plaintiff’s complaint be DISMISSED without

prejudice for failure to prosecute.

1Rule LR5.5(c)(2) of the Rules of the United States District Courts for the Eastern and

Western Districts of Arkansas provides as follows:

It is the duty of any party not represented by counsel 

to promptly notify the Clerk and the other parties to 

the proceedings of any change in his or her address, 

to monitor the progress of the case and to prosecute 

or defend the action diligently . . . . If any communication from the Court to a pro se plaintiff is not 

responded to within thirty (30) days, the case may be 

dismissed without prejudice. . . .

2

Case 5:16-cv-00078-KGB Document 4 Filed 04/19/16 Page 2 of 3
IT IS SO RECOMMENDED this 19th day of April, 2016.

_____________________________________

JEROME T. KEARNEY 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

3

Case 5:16-cv-00078-KGB Document 4 Filed 04/19/16 Page 3 of 3