Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_23-cv-01214/USCOURTS-caed-1_23-cv-01214-6/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Zachery Jones
Defendant
Thomas K. Mills
Plaintiff
Javier Rivera
Defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

THOMAS K. MILLS,

Plaintiff,

v.

ZACHERY JONES, et al.

Defendants.

No. 1:23-cv-01214-JLT-SAB (PC)

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST 

FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT

(ECF No. 19)

Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this action filed pursuant to 42 

U.S.C. § 1983. 

Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s request for entry of default, filed December 4, 

2023. (ECF No. 19.) 

Entry of default is appropriate as to any party against whom a judgment for affirmative 

relief is sought that has failed to plead or otherwise defend as provided by the Federal Rules of 

Civil Procedure and where that failure is shown by affidavit or otherwise. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 

55(a). Rule 12 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provides, “[A] defendant must serve an 

answer within 21 days after being served with the summons and complaint; or if it has timely 

waived service under Rule 4(d), within 60 days after the request for a waiver was sent.” Fed. R. 

Civ. P. 12(a)(1)(A). If a defendant fails to plead or otherwise defend an action after being 

properly served with a summons and complaint, a default judgment may be entered pursuant to 

Case 1:23-cv-01214-JLT-SAB Document 20 Filed 12/05/23 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Rule 55(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

Plaintiff requests an order entering default because a screening order was issued and “the 

summons and complaint was served on the defendants[,]” no answer has been filed within 21 

days. (ECF No. 19 at 2.) 

Plaintiff’s request for entry of default shall be denied. A review of the record reflects that

on November 6, 2023, Findings and Recommendations were issued recommending that the action 

proceed against Defendants Zachery Jones and Javier Rivera for excessive force in violation of 

the Eighth Amendment, and all other claims be dismissed from the action for failure to state a 

cognizable claim for relief. (ECF No. 16.) The Findings and Recommendations are pending 

review by the District Judge. Accordingly, the Court has not yet ordered service on Defendants 

and no response is due. Thus, Plaintiff's request for entry of default judgment must be denied.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: December 5, 2023 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:23-cv-01214-JLT-SAB Document 20 Filed 12/05/23 Page 2 of 2