Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-01052/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-01052-2/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Donald Peel
Plaintiff
Unknown
Defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DONALD PEEL,

Plaintiff,

v.

UNKNOWN,

Defendant.

No. 2:15-cv-1052 WBS CKD P

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

By order filed August 20, 2015, plaintiff was granted 30 days within which to file a 

complaint for violation of civil rights under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The thirty day period has expired, 

and plaintiff has not filed a complaint or otherwise responded to the court’s order.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without 

prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 

after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections 

with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings 

and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified 

/////

/////

Case 2:15-cv-01052-WBS-CKD Document 15 Filed 10/06/15 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 

(9th Cir. 1991).

Dated: October 6, 2015

1

peel1052.fta

_____________________________________

CAROLYN K. DELANEY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:15-cv-01052-WBS-CKD Document 15 Filed 10/06/15 Page 2 of 2