Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-00300/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-00300-2/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Stuart McDonald
Defendant
Tahoe Regional Planning Agency
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TAHOE REGIONAL PLANNING

AGENCY,

Plaintiff, CIV-S-05-0300 WBS GGH

vs.

STUART McDONALD,

Defendant. ORDER

__________________________________/

On May 19, 2006, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein

which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings

and recommendations were to be filed within ten days. No objections were filed.

 Accordingly, the court presumes any findings of fact are correct. See Orland v.

United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1999). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are

reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir.

1983).

The court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and, good cause appearing,

concludes that it is appropriate to adopt the Proposed Findings and Recommendations in full.

\\\\\

Case 2:05-cv-00300-WBS-GGH Document 19 Filed 07/05/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that:

1. The Proposed Findings and Recommendations filed May 19, 2006, are

ADOPTED; and

2. Plaintiff’s application for entry of default judgment is GRANTED. Judgment

is rendered in the amount of $15,000.00.

DATED: July 3, 2006

DGE

tahoe.jo

Case 2:05-cv-00300-WBS-GGH Document 19 Filed 07/05/06 Page 2 of 2