Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_23-cv-01351/USCOURTS-caed-1_23-cv-01351-6/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Jose Arellano-Cigfuego
Petitioner
Warden
Respondent

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOSE ARELLANO-CIGFUEGO,

Petitioner,

v.

WARDEN,

Respondent.

No. 1:23-cv-01351-WBS-SAB (HC)

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND 

RECOMMENDATIONS, GRANTING 

RESPONDENT’S MOTION TO DISMISS, 

DISMISSING PETITION FOR WRIT OF 

HABEAS CORPUS, AND DIRECTING 

CLERK OF COURT TO CLOSE CASE

(ECF Nos. 17, 24)

Petitioner Jose Arellano-Cigfuego is proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas 

corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate 

Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On September 30, 2024, the assigned Magistrate Judge issued findings and 

recommendation that recommended granting Respondent’s motion to dismiss and dismissing the 

petition as moot. (ECF No. 24.) The findings and recommendations were served on the parties1

and contained notice that any objections were to be filed within thirty (30) days of the date of 

service of the findings and recommendations. (Id.) To date, no objections have been filed, and the 

time for doing so has passed. 

1 The findings and recommendations mailed to Petitioner were returned as undeliverable because Petitioner was no 

longer at the address. Absent notice of a party’s change of address, service of documents at the prior address of the 

party is fully effective. Local Rule 182(f). 

Case 1:23-cv-01351-WBS-SAB Document 25 Filed 12/13/24 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), the Court has conducted a 

de novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court holds the findings 

and recommendations to be supported by the record and proper analysis. 

Accordingly:

1. The findings and recommendations issued on September 30, 2024 (ECF No. 24) are 

adopted in full;

2. Respondent’s motion to dismiss (ECF No. 17) is granted;

3. The petition for writ of habeas corpus is dismissed; and

4. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the case.

Dated: December 12, 2024

Case 1:23-cv-01351-WBS-SAB Document 25 Filed 12/13/24 Page 2 of 2