Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_16-cv-00687/USCOURTS-caed-1_16-cv-00687-3/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Irma Pacheco Banuelos
Plaintiff
Commissioner of Social Security
Defendant

Document Text:

Joint Stipulation for Extension of Time, Case No. 1:16-CV-00687-EPG

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

PHILLIP A. TALBERT

United States Attorney

DEBORAH LEE STACHEL

Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX

Social Security Administration

ROYA MASSOUMI, CSBN 242697

Special Assistant United States Attorney

160 Spear Street, Suite 800

San Francisco, California 94105

Telephone: (415) 977-8957

Facsimile: (415) 744-0134

E-Mail: Roya.Massoumi@SSA.gov

Attorneys for Defendant

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

FRESNO DIVISION

IRMA PACHECO BANUELOS

Plaintiff,

vs.

NANCY A. BERRYHILL1, 

Acting Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: 1:16-CV-00687-EPG

JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR 

EXTENSION OF TIME FOR 

DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO 

PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY 

JUDGMENT

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by the parties, through their respective counsel of record, 

that the time for responding to Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment be extended from 

February 6, 2017, to March 8, 2017 due to current workload demands. This is Defendant’s first 

request for extension. Good cause exists as counsel for Defendant has four other pending 

responses due at or around the same time and a Ninth Circuit responsive brief due to the U.S. 

Attorney’s Office shortly thereafter. Defendant respectfully requests additional time to respond 

 

1

Nancy A. Berryhill is now the Acting Commissioner of Social Security. Pursuant to Rule 25(d) of the Federal 

Rules of Civil Procedure, Nancy A. Berryhill should be substituted for Acting Commissioner Carolyn W. Colvin as 

the defendant in this suit. No further action needs to be taken to continue this suit by reason of the last sentence of 

section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).

Case 1:16-cv-00687-EPG Document 22 Filed 01/26/17 Page 1 of 3
Joint Stipulation for Extension of Time, Case No. 1:16-CV-00687-EPG

2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

to Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment in order to adequately research and analyze the 

issues presented by Plaintiff. Defendant makes this request in good faith with no intention to 

unduly delay the proceedings. 

The parties further stipulate that the Court’s Scheduling Order shall be modified 

accordingly.

Respectfully submitted,

Dated: January 25, 2017 /s/ *Cyrus Safa 

(*as authorized by email on January 25, 2017)

CYRUS SAFA

Attorney for Plaintiff

Dated: January 25, 2017 PHILLIP A. TALBERT

United States Attorney

DEBORAH LEE STACHEL

Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX

Social Security Administration

By /s/ Roya Massoumi 

Roya Massoumi

Special Assistant U.S. Attorney

Of Counsel:

TINA L. NAICKER

Assistant Regional Counsel

Attorneys for Defendant

Case 1:16-cv-00687-EPG Document 22 Filed 01/26/17 Page 2 of 3
Joint Stipulation for Extension of Time, Case No. 1:16-CV-00687-EPG

3

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

For the reasons stated in the stipulation, good cause appears to extend the time for 

responding to Plaintiff’s opening brief from February 6, 2017, to March 8, 2017.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 26, 2017 /s/

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:16-cv-00687-EPG Document 22 Filed 01/26/17 Page 3 of 3