Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_14-cv-00184/USCOURTS-caed-1_14-cv-00184-11/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Mission Bank
Defendant
Jan Richmond
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

On July 16, 2015, the parties filed a stipulation seeking to dismiss the action. (Doc. 57) The 

stipulation relies upon Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, under which “the plaintiff may 

dismiss an action without a court order by filing: (i) a notice of dismissal before the opposing party 

serves either an answer or a motion for summary judgment; or (ii) a stipulation of dismissal signed by 

all parties who have appeared.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A). Once such a notice has been filed, an 

order of the Court is not required to effectuate the dismissal. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(ii); Wilson v. 

City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997). 

///

///

///

///

///

JAN RICHMOND,

 Plaintiff,

v.

MISSION BANK, et al., 

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: 1:14-cv-00184 JLT 

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF THE COURT 

TO CLOSE THIS ACTION PURSUANT TO THE 

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL

(Doc. 57)

Case 1:14-cv-00184-JLT Document 58 Filed 07/17/15 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Based upon the foregoing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:

1. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to close this action in light of the notice of dismissal 

with prejudice filed and properly signed pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 17, 2015 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:14-cv-00184-JLT Document 58 Filed 07/17/15 Page 2 of 2