Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-02399/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-02399-7/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Jay Bhattacharya
Defendant
MyECHeck, Inc.
Plaintiff
Zipmark, Inc.
Counter Claimant

Document Text:

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

JOINT STIPULATION DISMISSING ACTION WITH 

PREJUDICE

14-CV-2399-JAM-KJN 

PAUL D. TRIPODI II, State Bar No. 162380 

GRACE J. PAK, State Bar No. 277705 

WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI 

Professional Corporation 

633 West Fifth Street, Suite 1550 

Los Angeles, CA 90071 

Telephone: (323) 210-2900 

Facsimile: (866) 974-7329 

Email: ptripodi@wsgr.com

Email: gpak@wsgr.com 

CRAIG BOLTON (PRO HAC VICE 

ADMITTED)

WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI 

Professional Corporation 

1301 Avenue of the Americas, 40th Floor 

New York, NY 10019 

Telephone: (212) 999-5800 

Facsimile: (212) 999-5899 

Email: cbolton@wsgr.com 

Attorneys for Defendant 

ZIPMARK, INC. 

BRIAN R. KATZ, State Bar No. 88895 

4364 Town Center Boulevard, Suite 207 

El Dorado Hills, CA 95762 

Telephone: (916) 933-5266 

Facsimile: (916) 933-7866 

Email: brian@katzbusinesslaw.com 

Attorney for Plaintiff 

MYECHECK, INC.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

MYECHECK, INC. a California Corporation, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

ZIPMARK, INC., JAY BHATTACHARYA, and 

Does 1 – 20, Inclusive, 

Defendants. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO.: 14-CV-2399-JAM-KJN 

JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER 

DISMISSING ACTION WITH 

PREJUDICE 

Judge: Hon. John A. Mendez 

Case 2:14-cv-02399-JAM-KJN Document 58 Filed 03/16/16 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

JOINT STIPULATION DISMISSING ACTION WITH 

PREJUDICE

14-CV-2399-JAM-KJN 

Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41 (a)(1)(A)(ii), plaintiff MyECheck, Inc. (“MyECheck”) and 

defendant Zipmark, Inc. (“Zipmark”) stipulate and agree that all claims, defenses, and 

counterclaims in this action – including (1) MyECheck’s claims, defenses and counterclaims and 

(2) Zipmark’s claims, defenses and counterclaims – are dismissed in their entirety with 

prejudice. It is further stipulated that each party shall bear its own costs and attorneys’ fees. 

Dated: March 15, 2015 

By: /s/ 

Brian R. Katz 

Attorney for Plaintiff 

MyECheck, Inc. 

Dated: March 15, 2015 WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI 

Professional Corporation 

By:/s/ 

Paul D. Tripodi, II 

Attorneys for Defendants 

Zipmark, Inc. and Jay Bhattacharya 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: 3/16/2016 /s/ John A. Mendez______________ 

 Hon. John A. Mendez 

 U. S. District Court Judge 

Case 2:14-cv-02399-JAM-KJN Document 58 Filed 03/16/16 Page 2 of 2