Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca5-19-50482/USCOURTS-ca5-19-50482-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Phillip Schuessler
Appellant
United States of America
Appellee

Document Text:

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-50482

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

PHILLIP SCHUESSLER, also known as Philip Martin Schuessler,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeals from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 5:17-CR-697-1

Before CLEMENT, GRAVES, and OLDHAM, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Phillip Schuessler has moved for 

leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 

386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). 

Schuessler has not filed a response. 

We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record 

reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

June 1, 2020

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 19-50482 Document: 00515435891 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/01/2020
No. 19-50482

2

presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s 

motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further 

responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. 

The judgment is REFORMED to provide for a concurrent five-year term 

of supervised release as to count two, as the district court imposed in its oral 

pronouncement. See United States v. Hernandez-Guevara, 162 F.3d 863, 877-

78 (5th Cir. 1998); United States v. Mireles, 471 F.3d 551, 557-58 (5th Cir.

2006). 

Case: 19-50482 Document: 00515435891 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/01/2020