Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_13-cv-00437/USCOURTS-caed-1_13-cv-00437-3/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Chris Aguilar
Plaintiff
General Motors Company
Defendant
General Motors LLC
Defendant

Document Text:

\

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

GREGORY R. OXFORD (SBN 62333)

ISAACS CLOUSE CROSE & OXFORD LLP

21515 Hawthorne Boulevard, Suite 950

Torrance, California 90503

Telephone: (310) 316-1990

Facsimile: (310) 316-1330

goxford@icclawfirm.com

Attorneys for Defendant

General Motors LLC 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CHRIS AGUILAR, individually and on 

behalf of a class of similarly situated 

individuals,

Plaintiff,

vs.

GENERAL MOTORS LLC, a Delaware 

Limited Liability Company, GENERAL 

MOTORS COMPANY, a Delaware 

Corporation,

Defendants.

Case No. 1:13-CV-00437-LJO-GSA

STIPULATION AND ORDER RE 

CONTINUANCE OF MANDATORY 

SCHEDULING CONFERENCE

Current Date: August 14, 2013

Time: 9:30 a.m.

Courtroom 10

Hon. Gary S. Austin

Whereas, the Mandatory Scheduling Conference in the above-captioned matter is 

presently set for August 14, 2013;

Whereas, the Court on July 25, 2013 issued its order (1) granting in part and 

denying in part the motion of defendant General Motors LLC (“GM”) to dismiss 

plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint, (2) granting plaintiff leave to file a second amended 

complaint no later than August 14, 2013, and (3) giving GM twenty days to file a response 

thereto (no later than September 3, 2013);

Whereas, plaintiff intends to file a second amended complaint and GM intends at 

present to file another motion to dismiss which the parties have agreed to set for hearing 

on October 8, 2013 in accordance with Judge O’Neill’s law and motion procedures;

Case 1:13-cv-00437-LJO-GSA Document 32 Filed 08/07/13 Page 1 of 3
- 2 -

\

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Whereas, it appears that the pleadings will not be fully at issue until, at the earliest,

late October 2013 and therefore the parties agree that their joint report and the scheduling 

conference would be premature on the dates presently set and that the requested 

continuance would avoid unnecessary expenditures of time by counsel and the Court 

given the forthcoming filing of a second amended complaint and motion to dismiss; and

Whereas, the parties have initiated the Rule 26(f) conference so that formal 

discovery may be propounded and prosecution of this case will not be delayed by a 

continuance of the Mandatory Scheduling Conference, 

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between plaintiff and GM, by and through 

their undersigned counsel of record, that the Mandatory Scheduling Conference may be 

set on November 13, 2013 or such other date thereafter as may be convenient to the 

Court’s calendar.

DATED: August 6, 2013 CAPSTONE LAW APC

By: /s/ Jordan L. Lurie

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

DATED: August 6, 2013 ISAACS CLOUSE CROSE & OXFORD LLP

By: /s/ Gregory R. Oxford

Attorneys for Defendant

ORDER

Good cause appearing therefor, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Mandatory 

Scheduling Conference currently set for August 14, 2013 shall be continued to November 

13, 2013 at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom 10.

Case 1:13-cv-00437-LJO-GSA Document 32 Filed 08/07/13 Page 2 of 3
- 3 -

\

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 7, 2013 /s/ Gary S. Austin 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

DEAC_Signature-END:

6i0kij8d

Case 1:13-cv-00437-LJO-GSA Document 32 Filed 08/07/13 Page 3 of 3