Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca10-24-01382/USCOURTS-ca10-24-01382-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Darryl Goodman
Appellant
United States of America
Appellee

Document Text:

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

_________________________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

DARRYL GOODMAN, 

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 24-1382

(D.C. No. 1:23-CR-00251-RM-6)

(D. Colo.)

_________________________________

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

_________________________________

Before HARTZ, TYMKOVICH, and BACHARACH, Circuit Judges.

_________________________________

Darryl Goodman pled guilty to distribution and possession of a controlled 

substance, and aiding and abetting the same, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a) and 

(b)(1)(B)(vi) and 18 U.S.C. § 2. His plea agreement contained a broad waiver of his 

appellate rights. Despite that waiver, Mr. Goodman filed this appeal. The 

government moved to enforce the appeal waiver under United States v. Hahn, 

359 F.3d 1315 (10th Cir. 2004) (en banc). In response, Mr. Goodman conceded he 

“is not opposed to enforcement of the appeal waiver, with the understanding that the 

appeal waiver does not waive a potential timely appeal from a denial of a motion 

* This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines 

of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. It may be cited, however, for 

its persuasive value consistent with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 and 10th Cir. R. 32.1.

FILED

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

December 30, 2024

Christopher M. Wolpert

Clerk of Court

Appellate Case: 24-1382 Document: 23 Date Filed: 12/30/2024 Page: 1
2

under 28 U.S.C. § 2255” based on ineffective assistance of counsel. Resp. at 3. 

Mr. Goodman’s understanding is correct. The appeal waiver does not prevent him 

from seeking collateral relief based on ineffective assistance of counsel. See Mot. to 

Enforce, Attach. 1 at 3. Based on Mr. Goodman’s concession, we grant the 

government’s motion to enforce the appeal waiver and dismiss this appeal.

Entered for the Court

Per Curiam

Appellate Case: 24-1382 Document: 23 Date Filed: 12/30/2024 Page: 2