Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_16-cv-04074/USCOURTS-cand-4_16-cv-04074-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Ally Financial Inc.
Cross-defendant
Weerachai Chaiwong
Plaintiff
Hanlees Fremont Hyundai
Defendant
Hanlees Fremont, Inc.
Cross-claimant

Document Text:

-1-

Stipulation to Extend Time for Hanlees Fremont, Inc. to Respond to Ally Financial, Inc.’s Notice of Motion and 

Motion to Dismiss Cross-Claims pursuant to Local Rule 6-1, and to Extend Time for Ally’s Reply Thereto 3:16-

cv-04074-HSG 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

MARTIN S. PUTNAM, SBN: 160951

LAW OFFICES OF MARTIN PUTNAM

1300 Clay Street, Suite 600

Oakland, CA 94612

Tel: (510) 466-6300

Fax: (510) 225-2625

martin@putnamlaw.com

Attorneys for Defendant and Cross-Complainant

Hanlees Fremont, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO COURTHOUSE

Weerachai Chaiwong, an individual,

Plaintiff,

v.

Hanlees Fremont, Inc., a California corporation,

dba Hanlees Fremont Hyundai;

Ally Financial, Inc., a Delaware corporation; and

Does 1 through 75, inclusive,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 3:16-cv-04074-HSG

Stipulation to Extend Time for Hanlees 

Fremont, Inc. to Respond to Ally Financial, 

Inc.’s Notice of Motion and Motion to 

Dismiss Cross-Claims pursuant to 

Local Rule 6-1, and to Extend Time for 

Ally’s Reply Thereto

Hearing Date: January 26, 2017

Time: 2:00 p.m.

Judge: Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr.

Courtroom: 10

Action Filed: May 25, 2016

Removed: July 20, 2016

Pursuant to Local Rule 6-1, Defendant Hanlees Fremont, Inc. (“Hanlees”) and 

Defendant Ally Financial Inc. (“Ally”) (together, the “Parties”) by and through their 

respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate as follows:

Case 4:16-cv-04074-HSG Document 41 Filed 12/07/16 Page 1 of 3
-2-

Stipulation to Extend Time for Hanlees Fremont, Inc. to Respond to Ally Financial, Inc.’s Notice of Motion and 

Motion to Dismiss Cross-Claims pursuant to Local Rule 6-1, and to Extend Time for Ally’s Reply Thereto 3:16-

cv-04074-HSG 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION 

WHEREAS, Defendant Ally Financial filed a Notice of Motion and Motion to 

Dismiss the Cross-Claims of Defendant Hanlees Fremont, Inc. (“Motion to Dismiss”) on 

November 7, 2016; 

WHEREAS, Hanlees’ response to the Motion to Dismiss is presently due for filing 

and service on November 21, 2016, and Ally’s reply to Hanlees’ response is presently 

due November 28, 2016;

WHEREAS, Ally has agreed to extend Hanlees’ time to respond to the Motion to 

Dismiss by fourteen (14) days, until December 5, 2016, to allow Hanlees sufficient time 

to respond in view of the issues raised, Hanlees counsel’s trial schedule and staff 

availability;

WHEREAS, Hanlees has agreed to extend Ally’s time to reply to Hanlees’ 

response to the Motion to Dismiss by fourteen (14) days after the stipulated new due date 

for Hanlees’ response, until December 19, 2016, to allow Ally sufficient time to reply to 

Hanlees’ response to the Motion to Dismiss in view of Ally’s counsel’s trial schedule;

and

WHEREAS, this extension will not have any effect on the current schedule for the 

case;

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED TO, by and between the Parties herein, through 

their respective attorneys of record, that Hanlees will have a fourteen (14) day extension,

up to and including December 5, 2016, in which to file and serve a response to Ally’s 

Motion to Dismiss; and Ally will have (14) days thereafter, until December 19, 2016, in 

which to file and serve a reply to Hanlees’ response.

This Stipulation is the first extension of time to respond to Ally’s Motion to 

Dismiss requested by Hanlees, and is the first extension of time to reply to Hanlees’ 

Case 4:16-cv-04074-HSG Document 41 Filed 12/07/16 Page 2 of 3
-3-

Stipulation to Extend Time for Hanlees Fremont, Inc. to Respond to Ally Financial, Inc.’s Notice of Motion and 

Motion to Dismiss Cross-Claims pursuant to Local Rule 6-1, and to Extend Time for Ally’s Reply Thereto 3:16-

cv-04074-HSG 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

response requested by Ally, and is made without prejudice to, or waiver of, any rights or 

defenses otherwise available to the Parties in this action. 

DATED: November 21, 2016 SEVERSON & WERSON

A Professional Corporation

By: /s/ Mary Kate Kamka

 Mary Kate Kamka

Attorneys for Defendant ALLY FINANCIAL INC.

Dated: November 21, 2016

 LAW OFFICES OF MARTIN PUTNAM

By: /s/ Martin S. Putnam _______________

Martin S. Putnam

Attorneys for Defendant and Cross-Complainant 

Hanlees Fremont, Inc.

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: December __, 2016 By: __________________________________

Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr.

7

Case 4:16-cv-04074-HSG Document 41 Filed 12/07/16 Page 3 of 3