Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_03-cv-01747/USCOURTS-caed-2_03-cv-01747-4/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
D. L. Runnels
Respondent
Phousaykeo Saysourivong
Petitioner

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

PHOUSAYKEO SAYSOURIVONG,

Petitioner, No. CIV S-03-1747 RRB DAD P

vs.

D. L. RUNNELS, et al., 

Respondent. ORDER

 /

Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has timely filed a notice of appeal of

this court's April 9, 2010 denial of his motion for relief from judgment pursuant to Fed. R. Civ.

P. 60(b). Before petitioner can appeal this decision, a certificate of appealability must issue. 28

U.S.C. § 2253(c); Fed. R. App. P. 22(b).

A certificate of appealability may issue under 28 U.S.C. § 2253 “only if the

applicant has made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C.

§ 2253(c)(2). The court must either issue a certificate of appealability indicating which issues

satisfy the required showing or must state the reasons why such a certificate should not issue. 

Fed. R. App. P. 22(b).

/////

/////

Case 2:03-cv-01747-RRB-DAD Document 35 Filed 05/21/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

For the reasons set forth in the April 9, 2010 order denying relief, petitioner has

not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. Accordingly, a certificate

of appealability should not issue in this action.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: 5/21/2010

S/RALPH R. BEISTLINE 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

/says1747.coa

Case 2:03-cv-01747-RRB-DAD Document 35 Filed 05/21/10 Page 2 of 2