Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_07-cv-01318/USCOURTS-azd-2_07-cv-01318-2/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Kevin Lewis Hobson
Plaintiff
Temple-Inlet
Defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 1

Order was entered August 3, 2007 (Doc. 11).

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Kevin Lewis Hobson, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Temple-Inlet, 

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV 07-1318-PHX-SMM

ORDER 

Currently pending before the Court are several motions filed by pro se Plaintiff Kevin

Lewis Hobson. The Court, however, notes that it received the identical motions from Plaintiff

last week and subsequently entered an Order1

 denying the Motions based on the fact that

Defendant had yet to be served and had not yet an opportunity to answer or defend the case.

Considering that the procedural posture of the case has not changed since that time, the motions

are repetitious and duplicative in nature. Consequently, it is the Court’s normal procedure to

therefore strike the documents as duplicative. Plaintiff is encouraged to consult the Local Rules

of the Court, the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, as well as seek legal advice concerning his

possible claims. 

Accordingly, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED Striking as duplicative Plaintiff’s Motions for Service

by U.S. Marshal (Doc. 15).

Case 2:07-cv-01318-SMM Document 18 Filed 08/08/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 - 2 -

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED Striking as duplicative Plaintiff’s Motion for

Preliminary Pretrial Conference (Doc. 13).

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED Striking as duplicative Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to

File a Proposed Case Management Plan (Doc. 17).

DATED this 8th day of August, 2007.

Case 2:07-cv-01318-SMM Document 18 Filed 08/08/07 Page 2 of 2