Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cr-00100/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cr-00100-17/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Holly Adams
Defendant
Devlin Hosner
Defendant
USA
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1 STIPULATION REGARDING EXCLUDABLE TIME 

PERIODS UNDER SPEEDY TRIAL ACT

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

PHILLIP A. TALBERT

United States Attorney

SAM STEFANKI

Assistant United States Attorney

501 I Street, Suite 10-100

Sacramento, CA 95814

Telephone: (916) 554-2700

Facsimile: (916) 554-2900

Attorneys for Plaintiff

United States of America

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff,

 v.

HOLLY ADAMS and DEVLIN HOSNER,

 Defendants.

CASE NO. 2:22-cr-00100-JAM

STIPULATION REGARDING EXCLUDABLE 

TIME PERIODS UNDER SPEEDY TRIAL ACT; 

FINDINGS AND ORDER

DATE: May 7, 2024

TIME: 9:00 a.m.

COURT: Hon. John A. Mendez

STIPULATION

1. By previous order, this matter was set for status on May 7, 2024. 

2. By this stipulation, the defendant now moves to continue the status conference until June 

18, 2024, at 09:00 a.m., and to exclude time between May 7, 2024, and June 18, 2024, under Local 

Code T4. 

3. The parties agree and stipulate, and request that the Court find the following: 

a) The discovery associated with this case includes thousands of pages of 

documents, photographs, and laboratory results, including materials derived from the dark web 

as well as the results of forensic examinations of electronic devices and of email search warrants.

Much of this discovery has been either produced directly to counsel and/or made available for 

inspection and copying.

///

Case 2:22-cr-00100-JAM Document 72 Filed 05/02/24 Page 1 of 3
2 STIPULATION REGARDING EXCLUDABLE TIME 

PERIODS UNDER SPEEDY TRIAL ACT

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

///

b) Counsel for the defendant desires additional time to consult with her client, 

review the current charges, conduct investigation and research related to the charges, review and 

copy discovery, and otherwise prepare for trial. Additionally, counsel for the defendant and 

counsel for the government are actively discussing proposed resolutions to the case. Counsel for 

the defendant and counsel for the government are optimistic that these discussions will result in a 

resolution by the requested status conference date of June 18, 2024.

c) Counsel for the defendant believes that failure to grant the above-requested 

continuance would deny her the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into 

account the exercise of due diligence.

d) The government does not object to the continuance.

e) Based on the above-stated findings, the ends of justice served by continuing the 

case as requested outweigh the interest of the public and the defendant in a trial within the 

original date prescribed by the Speedy Trial Act. 

f) For the purpose of computing time under the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161, 

et seq., within which trial must commence, the time period of May 7, 2024, to June 18, 2024, 

inclusive, is deemed excludable pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A), B(iv) [Local Code T4] 

because it results from a continuance granted by the Court at the defendant’s request on the basis 

of the Court’s finding that the ends of justice served by taking such action outweigh the best 

interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

///

///

///

///

///

///

///

///

Case 2:22-cr-00100-JAM Document 72 Filed 05/02/24 Page 2 of 3
3 STIPULATION REGARDING EXCLUDABLE TIME 

PERIODS UNDER SPEEDY TRIAL ACT

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

///

4. Nothing in this stipulation and order shall preclude a finding that other provisions of the 

Speedy Trial Act dictate that additional time periods are excludable from the period within which a trial 

must commence.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Dated: May 1, 2024 PHILLIP A. TALBERT

United States Attorney

/s/ SAM STEFANKI

SAM STEFANKI

Assistant United States Attorney

Dated: May 1, 2024 /s/ CHRISTINA SINHA

CHRISTINA SINHA

Counsel for Defendant 

HOLLY ADAMS

Dated: May 1, 2024 /s/ TONI WHITE

TONI WHITE

Counsel for Defendant 

DEVLIN HOSNER

ORDER

IT IS SO FOUND AND ORDERED.

Dated: May 01, 2024 /s/ John A. Mendez

THE HONORABLE JOHN A. MENDEZ

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:22-cr-00100-JAM Document 72 Filed 05/02/24 Page 3 of 3