Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-05428/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-05428-10/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Roy Adams
Plaintiff
Dontrell Bunter
Plaintiff
Robert Eggert
Plaintiff
Michael Ferris
Plaintiff
Ed Hall
Plaintiff
Inter-Con Security Services, Inc.
Defendant
Inter-Con Security Systems, Inc.
Defendant
Dujuan Nickson
Plaintiff
Rohit Singh
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 

 

745690.1 - 1 - 

COLLECTIVE ACTION AND CLASS ACTION 

[PROPOSED] FINAL JUDGMENT 

CASE NO. 06-5428 MHP 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

ROY ADAMS, ROBERT EGGERT, 

MICHAEL FERRIS, ED HALL, ROHIT 

SINGH, DUJUAN NICKSON, and 

DONTRELL BUNTER, on behalf of 

themselves and a class of those similarly 

situated, 

 Plaintiffs, 

v. 

INTER-CON SECURITY SYSTEMS, 

INC., d/b/a INTER-CON SECURITY 

SERVICES, INC., 

 Defendant. 

 Case No. C-06-5428 MHP 

COLLECTIVE ACTION AND CLASS 

ACTION 

[PROPOSED] FINAL JUDGMENT 

Date: February 25, 2008 

Time: 2:00 p.m. 

Courtroom: 15, 18th Floor 

Hon. Marilyn Hall Patel 

Case 3:06-cv-05428-MHP Document 174 Filed 02/26/08 Page 1 of 4
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 

 

745690.1 - 1 - 

COLLECTIVE ACTION AND CLASS ACTION 

[PROPOSED] FINAL JUDGMENT 

CASE NO. 06-5428 MHP 

WHEREAS, on October 29, 2007, this Court granted preliminary approval to a settlement 

of this action, embodied in the Settlement Agreement, attached as Exhibit 1 to this Court’s 

October 29, 2007 order; 

WHEREAS, the Court granted final approval to the settlement on February _____, 2008, 

finding that the settlement is fair, reasonable and adequate within the meaning of Federal Rule of 

Civil Procedure 23(e) and applicable law; and 

WHEREAS, the Court has found that the notice sent to the Class Members fairly and 

adequately informed the Classes of the terms of the settlement, was consistent with Federal Rule 

of Civil Procedure 23 and due process, and was given in the manner prescribed by the Settlement 

Agreement and the Court’s order preliminarily approving the settlement: 

This Court hereby enters final judgment in this case, and dismisses it with prejudice, in 

accordance with the terms of the Settlement Agreement, attached as Exhibit 1 to the October 29, 

2007 order granting preliminary approval, and the Order (1) Confirming Final Certification of 

Classes and Collective Action and (2) Granting Final Approval to Class Action Settlement (“Final 

Approval Order”). The Court hereby permanently enjoins and restrains all individuals from 

asserting any and all claims that were released pursuant to the Settlement Agreement and the 

Final Approval Order. This Final Judgment shall not bind the persons listed in Exhibit A, who 

have timely opted out of the settlement class. 

Without affecting the finality of this Final Judgment in any way, the Court reserves 

exclusive and continuing jurisdiction over this action, the Named Plaintiffs, the Classes, and the 

Defendant for the purposes of (a) supervising the implementation, enforcement, construction and 

interpretation of the Settlement Agreement, the Preliminary Approval Order, the Final Approval 

Order, and this Final Judgment and the distribution of Settlement Payments and tax forms; and 

Case 3:06-cv-05428-MHP Document 174 Filed 02/26/08 Page 2 of 4
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 

 

745690.1 - 2 - 

COLLECTIVE ACTION AND CLASS ACTION 

[PROPOSED] FINAL JUDGMENT 

CASE NO. 06-5428 MHP 

(b) hearing, determining and implementing the application, in accordance with the terms of the 

Settlement Agreement, by Class Counsel for an award of attorneys’ fees, costs, and expenses and 

by the Named Plaintiffs for service payments. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: February ____, 2008 __________________________________ 

 The Hon. Marilyn Hall Patel 

 United States District Judge 

25

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Marilyn H. Patel

Case 3:06-cv-05428-MHP Document 174 Filed 02/26/08 Page 3 of 4
EXHIBIT A 

Exhibit A To be filed before 

February 25, 2008 hearing, once Claims 

Administrator and Class Counsel confirm 

final list of opt outs by name 

Case 3:06-cv-05428-MHP Document 174 Filed 02/26/08 Page 4 of 4