Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00236/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00236-4/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Jason Saunders
Petitioner
James Yates
Respondent

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

U.S . District Court

 E. D . California cd 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JASON SAUNDERS, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

)

v. )

)

)

)

JAMES YATES, )

)

Respondent. )

____________________________________)

1:05-CV-0236 REC LJO HC 

ORDER VACATING AUGUST 8, 2005, 

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

THAT HAD RECOMMENDED THE

PETITION BE DISMISSED

[Doc. #13]

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT

TO RE-SERVE ORDER OF JUNE 15, 2005

[Doc. #12]

ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254.

On August 8, 2005, the undersigned issued a Findings and Recommendation that

recommended the petition be dismissed for Petitioner’s failure to comply with a court order. The

Court found that Petitioner had failed to file an amended petition in compliance with the Court’s

orders of April 21, 2005, and June 15, 2005. On August 29, 2005, Petitioner filed objections to the

Findings and Recommendation. Petitioner states he did not receive the Court’s order of June 15,

2005. In support of his contention, he submits a copy of his prison mail log which shows that he did

not receive any mail from this Court between June 15, 2005, and July 12, 2005. Further, he states

Case 1:05-cv-00236-REC-LJO Document 15 Filed 09/15/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

U.S . District Court

 E. D . California cd 2

that the mail he received from this Court on July 12, 2005, was not the order of June 15, 2005. The

Court finds Petitioner has shown good cause to vacate the Findings and Recommendation.

Accordingly, the Court hereby VACATES the Findings and Recommendation of August 8,

2005. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to re-serve the order of June 15, 2005, on Petitioner along

with this order. Petitioner is GRANTED thirty (30) days from the date of service of this order to file

an amended petition in compliance with the orders of April 21, 2005, and June 15, 2005.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 14, 2005 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill 

b9ed48 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:05-cv-00236-REC-LJO Document 15 Filed 09/15/05 Page 2 of 2