Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca13-15-01620/USCOURTS-ca13-15-01620-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Osram GmbH
Appellant
E. Fred Schubert
Appellee

Document Text:

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

OSRAM GMBH,

Appellant

v.

E. FRED SCHUBERT,

Appellee

______________________ 

2015-1620

______________________ 

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark 

Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board, in No. IPR2013-

00459.

______________________ 

JUDGMENT

______________________ 

CHARLES SANDERS, Latham & Watkins LLP, Boston, 

MA, argued for appellant. Also represented by WILLIAM 

M. JAY, Goodwin Procter LLP, Washington, DC.

DANIEL LADOW, Troutman Sanders LLP, New York, 

NY, argued for appellee. Also represented by JAMES M.

BOLLINGER, MAGNUS ESSUNGER, TIMOTHY P. HEATON;

JUSTIN BARNES, LARA SUE GARNER, San Diego, CA.

Case: 15-1620 Document: 66-2 Page: 1 Filed: 04/08/2016
 

THOMAS W. KRAUSE, Office of the Solicitor, United 

States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, for 

intervenor Michelle K. Lee. Also represented by SCOTT 

WEIDENFELLER, LORE A. UNT. 

______________________ 

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 

 PER CURIAM (DYK, MAYER, and STOLL, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

April 8, 2016 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole

Date Daniel E. O’Toole 

 Clerk of Court

Case: 15-1620 Document: 66-2 Page: 2 Filed: 04/08/2016