Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca8-15-03819/USCOURTS-ca8-15-03819-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Corhart
Not Party
Kyler
Appellee
Schmadeder
Not Party
Charles Swift
Appellant

Document Text:

United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 15-3819

___________________________

Charles Swift

lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant

v.

Kyler

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee

Schmadeder, Chief of police; Corhart, Omaha Police

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants

____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the District of Nebraska - Omaha

____________

 Submitted: May 23, 2016

Filed: May 26, 2016

[Unpublished]

____________

Before SMITH, ARNOLD, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges. 

____________

PER CURIAM.

Appellate Case: 15-3819 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/26/2016 Entry ID: 4403195 
Charles Swift appeals following the district court’s1

 adverse grant of summary

judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. Upon de novo review and careful

consideration of Swift’s arguments for reversal, we conclude that the 28 U.S.C. 

§ 1915(e)(2)(B) dismissal of Swift’s claims against the City of Omaha was proper, see

Moore v. Sims, 200 F.3d 1170, 1171 (8th Cir. 2000) (per curiam); and that Swift

created no jury questions on his claims against Richard Kyler, a police officer, see

Moody v. St. Charles County, 23 F.3d 1410, 1412 (8th Cir. 1994) (party seeking to

defeat summary judgment must substantiate allegations with sufficient probative

evidence permitting finding in his favor). The judgment of the district court is

affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. 

______________________________

1

The Honorable John M. Gerrard, United States District Judge for the District

of Nebraska.

-2-

Appellate Case: 15-3819 Page: 2 Date Filed: 05/26/2016 Entry ID: 4403195