Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-00222/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-00222-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Ryan Carroll
Petitioner
Dennis Smith
Respondent

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RYAN CARROLL, )

)

)

Petitioner, )

)

v. )

)

)

DENNIS SMITH, Warden, )

)

)

Respondent. )

)

 )

1:07-cv-00222-LJO-TAG HC 

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATION (Doc. 6)

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS

PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

(Doc. 5)

ORDER DISMISSING PETITION FOR WRIT

OF HABEAS CORPUS (Doc. 1)

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT

TO ENTER JUDGMENT

On February 9, 2007, Petitioner filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 2241 in this Court. (Doc. 1).

On May 4, 2007, Respondent filed a motion to dismiss the petition as moot. (Doc. 5). 

On October 4, 2007, the Magistrate Judge assigned to the case filed a Findings and

Recommendation recommending that Respondent’s motion to dismiss be granted. (Doc. 6). 

This Findings and Recommendation was served on all parties and contained notice that any

objections were to be filed within fifteen days from the date of service of that order. To date, the

parties have not filed timely objections to the Findings and Recommendation.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted

Case 1:07-cv-00222-LJO-TAG Document 8 Filed 11/05/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

a de novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court concludes that

the Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendation is supported by the record and proper

analysis. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Report and Recommendation, filed October 4, 2007 (Doc. 6), is ADOPTED

IN FULL;

2. Respondent’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 5), is GRANTED;

3. This petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. 1), is DISMISSED; and

4. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to ENTER JUDGMENT and close the file. 

This order terminates the action in its entirety. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: November 4, 2007 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill 

b9ed48 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:07-cv-00222-LJO-TAG Document 8 Filed 11/05/07 Page 2 of 2