Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_08-cv-01125/USCOURTS-caed-2_08-cv-01125-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Gregory Brownlow
Plaintiff
K. Mendoza-Powers
Defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GREGORY BROWNLOW,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-08-1125-LKK-DAD P

vs.

K. MENDOZA-POWERS,

Defendant. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

A recent court document was served on plaintiff's address of record and returned

by the postal service as undeliverable. It appears that plaintiff has failed to comply with Local

Rule 83-182(f), which requires that a party appearing in propria persona inform the court of any

address change.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed for

plaintiff's failure to keep the court apprised of his current address. See Local Rules 83-182(f) and

11-110.

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty

days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written

objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s

Case 2:08-cv-01125-LKK -DAD Document 21 Filed 09/08/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the

specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951

F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: September 5, 2008.

DAD:cm/4

brow1125.33a

Case 2:08-cv-01125-LKK -DAD Document 21 Filed 09/08/08 Page 2 of 2