Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-04257/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-04257-2/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Cobra Technologies Corp.
Defendant
Cobra Technologies International, Inc.
Defendant
Robert M. Katter
Defendant
Pipeline Observation System Management (POSM)
Defendant
R.S. Technical Services, Inc.
Defendant
James W. Raulston
Plaintiff
Robert C. Soltysik
Plaintiff
Subcam, Inc.
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1 STIPULATION TO EXTEND LITIGATION DEADLINE; 

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

C06-04257-CRB

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

John M. Farrell (SBN 99649/jfarrell@fr.com) 

FISH & RICHARDSON P.C. 

500 Arguello Street, Suite 500 

Redwood City, CA 94063 

Telephone: (650) 839-5070 

Facsimile: (650) 839-5071 

Attorneys for Defendant 

COBRA TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

SUBCAM, INC., a Florida corporation; 

JAMES W. RAULSTON, an individual,; and 

ROBERT C. SOLTYSIK, an individual, 

 Plaintiffs, 

v. 

COBRA TECHNOLOGIES CORP., a Georgia 

corporation; COBRA TECHNOLOGIES 

INTERNATIONAL, INC., a Delaware 

corporation; PIPELINE OBSERVATION 

SYSTEM MANAGEMENT (POSM), an 

unknown entity; ROBERT M. KATTER, an 

individual; and R.S. TECHNICAL SERVICES, 

INC. a California corporation, 

 Defendants. 

C06-04257-CRB 

STIPULATION TO EXTEND 

LITIGATION DEADLINE PURSUANT TO 

CIVIL LOCAL RULES 6-2 AND 7-12; 

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs SUBCAM, INC., JAMES W. RAULSTON and ROBERT C. 

SOLTYSIK (“Plaintiffs”) filed their Complaint on July 11, 2006. Defendant COBRA 

TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION (“COBRA”) was served with Summons and Complaint in 

this matter on or about September 1, 2006. Pursuant to Stipulation and Order, COBRA was 

granted an extension of time to respond to the Complaint. Barring further extensions of time, 

COBRA will respond to the Complaint on October 20, 2006. 

Case 3:06-cv-04257-CRB Document 11 Filed 10/03/06 Page 1 of 4
2 STIPULATION TO EXTEND LITIGATION DEADLINE; 

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

C06-04257-CRB

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WHEREFORE, Defendants PIPELINE OBSERVATION SYSTEM MANAGEMENT 

(POSM), ROBERT M. KATTER and R.S. TECHNICAL SERVICES, INC. (the “POSM 

Defendants”), were timely served with Summons and Complaint. Pursuant to Stipulation and 

Order, the POSM Defendants were granted an extension of time to respond to the Complaint. 

Barring further extensions of time, the POSM Defendants will respond to the Complaint on 

October 18, 2006. 

WHEREFORE, all defendants have not yet been served with Summons and Complaint and 

have not appeared or received extensions of time to respond to the Complaint. 

WHEREFORE, the Case Management Conference is scheduled for October 13, 2006, in 

this Court. All defendants who have retained counsel and appeared in this action will not be 

required to respond to the Complaint until dates subsequent to the currently scheduled date for the 

Case Management Conference. 

WHEREFORE, all defendants who have retained counsel and appeared in this action are in 

agreement that the case will not be ready for a Case Management Conference on October 13, 

2006, and wish to continue the Case Management Conference to a later date. 

WHEREFORE, COBRA and the POSM Defendants have agreed to extend the Case 

Management Conference, as follows: 

Action Current Deadline Stipulated Extension 

Case Management 

Conference 

October 13, 2006 [Proposed: November 17, 2006] 

WHEREFORE, there have been no previous time modifications in this case, except with 

respect to defendants’ responses to the Complaint. 

WHEREFORE, the parties respectfully request the Court to adopt the above-stated 

schedule. 

/ / / 

/ / / 

/ / / 

Case 3:06-cv-04257-CRB Document 11 Filed 10/03/06 Page 2 of 4
3 STIPULATION TO EXTEND LITIGATION DEADLINE; 

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

C06-04257-CRB

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED that the parties adhere to the extended schedule listed 

above. 

Dated: September 29, 2006 Law Offices of Henry Harmeling IV, APC 

By: \s\ Henry Harmeling IV 

Henry Harmeling IV 

Attorney for Plaintiffs 

Pursuant to General Order 45, Section X(B) regarding signatures, I attest under penalty of 

perjury that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from Henry 

Harmeling IV. 

Dated: September 29, 2006 FISH & RICHARDSON P.C. 

By: \s\ John M. Farrell 

 John M. Farrell 

Attorneys for Defendant 

COBRA TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION 

Dated: September 29, 2006 LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP 

By: \s\ Deborah F. Sirias 

Deborah F. Sirias 

Attorneys for Defendants 

PIPELINE OBSERVATION SYSTEM 

MANAGEMENT (POSM), ROBERT M. 

KATTER and R.S. TECHNICAL SERVICES, 

INC. 

Case 3:06-cv-04257-CRB Document 11 Filed 10/03/06 Page 3 of 4
4 STIPULATION TO EXTEND LITIGATION DEADLINE; 

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

C06-04257-CRB

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Pursuant to General Order 45, Section X(B) regarding signatures, I attest under penalty of 

perjury that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from Deborah F. Sirias. 

Dated: September 29, 2006 FISH & RICHARDSON P.C. 

By: \s\ John M. Farrell 

 John M. Farrell 

Attorneys for Defendant 

COBRA TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION 

Dated: September 29, 2006 FISH & RICHARDSON P.C. 

By: \s\ John M. Farrell 

 John M. Farrell 

Attorneys for Defendant 

COBRA TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION 

ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: ______________, 2006 

 

 Hon. Charles R. Breyer 

 Judge of the United States District Court 

50373633.doc 

October 03

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Charles R. Breyer

Case 3:06-cv-04257-CRB Document 11 Filed 10/03/06 Page 4 of 4