Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-15-07556/USCOURTS-ca4-15-07556-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Colly Cascen
Appellant
Harold W. Clarke
Appellee
J. C. Combs
Appellee
Gregory Holloway
Appellee
John Jabe
Appellee
Brenda Ravizee
Appellee
Quinn Reynolds
Appellee
David Robinson
Appellee
Rebecca Young
Appellee

Document Text:

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-7556

COLLY CASCEN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director of the State of Virginia 

Department of Corrections; ASST. WARDEN DAVID ROBINSON, 

Chief of Operations of the State of Virginia Department of 

Corrections; JOHN JABE, Deputy Director of Operations; J. C. 

COMBS, Warden at Wallens Ridge State Prison; REBECCA YOUNG, 

Operations Manager/Supervisor of the Wallens Ridge State 

Prison; BRENDA RAVIZEE, Institutional Ombudsman/Grievance 

Coordinator; QUINN REYNOLDS, Unit Manager/Supervisor at 

Wallens Ridge State Prison; GREGORY HOLLOWAY, 

Superintendent/Warden of Wallens Ridge State Prison,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Norman K. Moon, Senior 

District Judge. (7:15-cv-00061-NKM-RSB)

Submitted: May 13, 2016 Decided: June 3, 2016

Before SHEDD, KEENAN, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Colly Cascen, Appellant Pro Se. Mark Rankin Herring, Attorney 

General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Appeal: 15-7556 Doc: 21 Filed: 06/03/2016 Pg: 1 of 3
2

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 15-7556 Doc: 21 Filed: 06/03/2016 Pg: 2 of 3
3

PER CURIAM:

Colly Cascen appeals the district court’s order granting 

summary judgment to the Defendants on his complaint asserting

claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) and the Religious Land Use 

and Institutionalized Persons Act, 42 U.S.C. § 2000cc to 

§ 2000cc-5 (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no 

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated 

by the district court. Cascen v. Clarke, No. 7:15-cv-00061-NKMRSB (W.D. Va. Aug. 26, 2015). We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented 

in the materials before this court and argument would not aid 

the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Appeal: 15-7556 Doc: 21 Filed: 06/03/2016 Pg: 3 of 3