Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca8-02-04124/USCOURTS-ca8-02-04124-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
John Ashcroft
Respondent
Mareko Molathwa
Petitioner

Document Text:

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 02-4124

___________

Mareko Molathwa, *

*

Petitioner, *

* Petition for Review of an

v. * Order of the Board of

* Immigration Appeals.

John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the *

United States of America, *

*

Respondent. *

___________

Submitted: April 21, 2004 

Filed: July 8, 2004

___________

Before RILEY, MELLOY, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges.

___________

RILEY, Circuit Judge.

Mareko Molathwa (Molathwa), a citizen of Botswana, has moved to stay the

Board of Immigration Appeals’ (BIA) grant of voluntary departure pending appellate

review of the denial of his application for asylum and withholding of removal.

Respondent opposes the motion. For the reasons stated below, we deny Molathwa’s

motion for stay.

Molathwa entered the United States in December 1997 on a six-month

nonimmigrant visa. He was charged in November 1999 with being deportable under

8 U.S.C. § 1227(a)(1)(B), for remaining in the United States beyond the permitted

Appellate Case: 02-4124 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/08/2004 Entry ID: 1785616 
1

An alien who fails to depart voluntarily within the time granted faces stiff

penalties: a civil penalty of $1,000-$5,000, plus a 10-year period of ineligibility for

cancellation of removal, adjustment of status, voluntary departure, or change of

nonimmigrant classification relief. See 8 U.S.C. § 1229c(d).

-2-

time; several months earlier, he had applied for asylum and withholding of removal.

In February 2001, an Immigration Judge (IJ) denied Molathwa asylum and

withholding of removal, and granted voluntary departure until April 23, 2001.

Molathwa appealed to the BIA, which affirmed on November 26, 2002, and ordered

him to depart voluntarily within 30 days or “any extension beyond that time as may

be granted by the district director.” Molathwa then brought this timely petition for

review of the BIA’s order, and on February 9, 2004, he moved for a stay of voluntary

departure, arguing this court has equitable power to grant such a stay pending

appellate review.

An alien subject to removal may be permitted to depart voluntarily at the

alien’s own expense if, at the conclusion of removal proceedings, an IJ enters an

order granting the alien voluntary departure in lieu of forced removal.1

 See 8 U.S.C.

§ 1229c(b)(1) (requirements for grant of voluntary departure), (2) (voluntarydeparture period shall not exceed 60 days). The Immigration and Nationality Act, as

amended in 1996, limits the role of the courts in setting deadlines for voluntary

departure, see 8 U.S.C. §§ 1229c(f), 1252(a)(2)(B)(i), and regulations promulgated

by the Executive Branch provide that the authority to “extend” the

voluntary-departure period lies exclusively within the “jurisdiction of the district

director, the Deputy Executive Associate Commissioner for Detention and Removal,

or the Director of the Office of Juvenile Affairs.” See 8 C.F.R. § 1240.26(f) (2003).

The BIA granted Molathwa permission to depart voluntarily within 30 days of

November 26, 2002, or any extension beyond that time as might be granted by the

district directors. Significantly, Molathwa does not allege that he applied for an

Appellate Case: 02-4124 Page: 2 Date Filed: 07/08/2004 Entry ID: 1785616 
2

We do not decide whether this court may stay a voluntary-departure period if

the motion for stay is filed before expiration of the voluntary-departure period.

-3-

extension or that an extension was granted by the district directors. The time for

Molathwa to depart voluntarily has, therefore, long ago expired.

Nevertheless, Molathwa moves for a stay of voluntary departure, partly relying

on our decision in Safaie v. INS, 25 F.3d 636, 641 n.1 (8th Cir. 1994) (holding that

if alien petitions for review of BIA decision, which also includes grant of voluntary

departure, then voluntary-departure period does not begin until appellate process has

concluded). Molathwa’s reliance on Safaie, however, is misplaced because at the

time Molathwa delayed his departure beyond the specified voluntary-departure date,

the statute interpreted by Safaie was no longer in effect, see 8 U.S.C. § 1105a (1994),

repealed by Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996,

Pub. L. No. 104-208, 110 Stat. 3009 (Sept. 30, 1996). Molathwa also relies on El

Himri v. Ashcroft, 344 F.3d 1261 (9th Cir. 2003), and Nwakanma v. Ashcroft, 352

F.3d 325 (6th Cir. 2003) (per curiam), in arguing that this court has equitable power

to grant a stay of voluntary departure. Molathwa’s reliance on those cases is also

misplaced because in both, the applicant filed a motion for a stay of voluntary

departure before the period for voluntary departure had expired. See Nwakanma, 352

F.3d at 327; El Himri, 344 F.3d at 1263 n.2.

Because Molathwa’s voluntary-departure period has expired and he did not

move for a stay before its expiration, we find that granting a stay would have the

effect of extending the voluntary-departure period, and under section 1240.26(f),

extensions are committed exclusively to the specially designated executive officers.2

See Sviridov v. Ashcroft, 358 F.3d 722, 731 (10th Cir. 2004) (denying motion for

stay of voluntary departure where alien moved for stay after voluntary-departure

period had expired); Zazueta-Carrillo v. Ashcroft, 322 F.3d 1166, 1173 (9th Cir.

Appellate Case: 02-4124 Page: 3 Date Filed: 07/08/2004 Entry ID: 1785616 
-4-

2003) (if our court were to hold that voluntary-departure period does not begin until

after appellate review, the ruling would have effect of extending voluntary departure

beyond period specified by executive officers, and regulations deny courts this

power).

Accordingly, we deny Molathwa’s motion for a stay of voluntary departure.

______________________________

Appellate Case: 02-4124 Page: 4 Date Filed: 07/08/2004 Entry ID: 1785616