Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_09-cv-01801/USCOURTS-caed-1_09-cv-01801-5/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
D. G. Adams
Respondent
Robert W. Washington
Petitioner

Document Text:

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

In this action, the petition was filed on October 1, 2009. (Doc. 1). On February 27, 2013, the 

Magistrate Judge assigned to the case issued Findings and Recommendations to dismiss the petition. 

(Doc. 40). On March 18, 2013, Petitioner filed a notice of appeal. (Doc. 42). The Findings and 

Recommendations were adopted on March 22, 2013 (Doc. 44) and the Court entered judgment on that 

same date. (Doc. 45). 

On March 27, 2013, Petitioner filed his motion to abrogate the notice of appeal since it was 

premature. (Doc. 46). Subsequently, Petitioner pursued an appeal in the Ninth Circuit, which, on 

November 12, 2015, affirmed the Court’s dismissal. (Doc. 55). Apparently, due to an administrative 

error, the motion to abrogate is still pending, despite the fact that the case is closed and the appeal has 

been concluded.

///

///

ROBERT W. WASHINGTON,

 Petitioner,

v.

D. G. ADAMS, Warden,

Respondents.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: 1:09-cv-01801-AWI-JLT

ORDER DENYING AS MOOT PETITIONER’S 

MOTION TO ABROGATE NOTICE OF APPEAL

(Doc. 46)

Case 1:09-cv-01801-AWI-JLT Document 57 Filed 02/10/16 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

For the foregoing reasons, the Court ORDERS Petitioner’s motion to abrogate the notice of 

appeal (Doc. 46), is DENIED as MOOT.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 9, 2016 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:09-cv-01801-AWI-JLT Document 57 Filed 02/10/16 Page 2 of 2