Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-00076/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-00076-3/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Mikail Ali
Defendant
City and County of San Francisco
Defendant
Joe Cordes
Defendant
Suzy Loftus
Defendant
Heather Marlowe
Plaintiff
Greg Surh
Defendant

Document Text:

3:16-cv-00076-MMC 1

STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANTS’ 

MOTION TO DISMISS AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ALEXANDER S. ZALKIN, ESQ. (#280813)

The Zalkin Law Firm, P.C.

12555 High Bluff Drive, Suite 301

San Diego, CA 92130

Tel: 858-259-3011

Fax: 858-259-3015

Email: alex@zalkin.com

Attorney for Plaintiff

DENNIS J. HERRERA (#139669)

City Attorney

CHERYL ADAMS (#164194)

Chief Trial Deputy

MARGARET W. BAUMGARTNER (#151762)

RENEE L. ERICKSON (#304983)

Deputy City Attorneys

1390 Market Street, 6th

Tel: 415-554-3853

Fax: 415-554-3837

Email: renee.erickson@sfgov.org

Attorneys for Defendants

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

HEATHER MARLOWE, an individual,

Plaintiff,

vs.

CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN 

FRANCISCO, a governmental entity; 

SUZY LOFTUS, individually and in her 

official capacity as President of the San 

Francisco Police Commission; GREG 

SURH, individually and in his official 

capacity as Chief of Police of the San 

Francisco Police Department; MIKAIL 

ALI, individually and in his official 

capacity of Deputy Chief of the San 

Francisco Police Department; JOE 

CORDES, individually and in his official 

capacity as an officer of the San Francisco 

Police Department; and Does 6 through 

100, inclusive,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: 3:16-cv-00076-MMC

STIPULATION TO EXTEND 

DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO 

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS 

AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

Dept: Courtroom 7, 19th floor

Judge: Maxine M. Chesney

Date of Filing: December 21, 2016

Case 3:16-cv-00076-MMC Document 45 Filed 12/21/16 Page 1 of 4
3:16-cv-00076-MMC 2

STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANTS’ 

MOTION TO DISMISS AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WHEREAS, Plaintiff filed her Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”) on October 21, 

2016;

WHEREAS, Defendants filed their Rule 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s SAC 

(“Motion”) on November 23, 2016;

WHEREAS, based on Defendants’ counsel’s request, the Parties agreed, and this Court 

ordered, that Plaintiff’s deadline to respond to Defendants’ Motion be moved to December 21, 

2016 and Defendants’ deadline to reply be moved to December 30, 2016;

WHEREAS, an unexpected personal issue precluded Plaintiff’s from working on 

Plaintiff’s Response to Defendant’s Motion on December 20, 2016;

WHEREAS, the Parties have agreed to allow Plaintiff a one day extension to respond, 

making Plaintiff’s new deadline December 22, 2016; 

WHEREAS, this one-day extension will have no effect on Defendant’s deadline to 

Reply to Plaintiff’s response, or on the hearing date on Defendant’s Motion;

Case 3:16-cv-00076-MMC Document 45 Filed 12/21/16 Page 2 of 4
3:16-cv-00076-MMC 3

STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANTS’ 

MOTION TO DISMISS AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

NOW THEREFORE, the Parties hereby stipulate, and request that this Court order, that 

the deadline for Plaintiff to respond to Defendants’ Motion be extended from December 21, 

2016 to December 22, 2016.

Date: December 21, 2016 THE ZALKIN LAW FIRM, P.C

By: /s/ Alexander S. Zalkin 

Alexander S. Zalkin

Attorney for Plaintiff

HEATHER MARLOWE

Date: December 21, 2016 DENNIS J. HERRERA

City Attorney

CHERYL ADAMS

Chief Trial Deputy

MARGARET W. BAUMGARTNER

RENEE L. ERICKSON

Deputy City Attorneys

By: /s/ Renne L. Erickson___

Renee L. Erickson

Attorneys for Defendants

CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO

 

ATTESTATION CLAUSE

I attest under penalty of perjury that concurrence in the filing of this document has been 

obtained from the above signatories.

Date: December 21, 2016 By: /s/ Alexander S. Zalkin 

Alexander S. Zalkin

Attorney for Plaintiff

HEATHER MARLOWE

Case 3:16-cv-00076-MMC Document 45 Filed 12/21/16 Page 3 of 4
3:16-cv-00076-MMC 4

STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANTS’ 

MOTION TO DISMISS AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

PROPOSED ORDER

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, that Plaintiff’s new deadline to respond to Defendants’ 

Rule 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint is December 22, 2016.

Dated: ______ By:_______________________________

 United States District Judge

December 21, 2016

Case 3:16-cv-00076-MMC Document 45 Filed 12/21/16 Page 4 of 4