Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-01571/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-01571-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Riley Noonkester
Plaintiff
Clay Parker
Defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RILEY NOONKESTER,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-1571 DFL KJM P

vs.

CLAY PARKER, et al.,

Defendants. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

By order filed August 5, 2004, plaintiff was granted leave to file an amended civil

action. The time has expired and plaintiff has not filed an amended civil action or otherwise

responded to the court’s order.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed

without prejudice. See Local Rule 11-110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty

days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written

objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s

Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the

/////

Case 2:04-cv-01571-DFL -KJM Document 5 Filed 10/20/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951

F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: October 20, 2005.

______________________________________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

noon1571.fta

Case 2:04-cv-01571-DFL -KJM Document 5 Filed 10/20/05 Page 2 of 2