Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-01265/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-01265-2/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Frank Mendes
Plaintiff
W.M. Lyles Co.
Defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

In Defendant’s motion to dismiss, a declaration is referenced. The Teixiera Declaration was submitted as 1

part of a prior motion to dismiss that was rendered moot by the voluntary filing of the First Amended Complaint. 

The Teixiera Declaration attaches various Bargaining Agreements. The motion to dismiss identifies specific

provisions of the various Bargaining Agreements and cites to the Teixiera Declaration. Plaintiff did not expressly

address the particular provisions identified by Defendant. In deciding a motion to dismiss, the Court may consider

documents the authenticity of which is not contested, and upon which the plaintiff’s complaint necessarily relies,

without converting the motion to dismiss into a motion for summary judgment. See Parrino v. FHP, Inc., 146 F.3d

699, 705-06 (9th Cir. 1998). Unless objections are filed on or by December 17, 2007, the Court will consider

Teixiera Declaration Exhibits C, D, and E, in accordance with Parrino, in deciding the motion to dismiss. 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

FRANK MENDES, )

 )

Plaintiff, )

)

v. )

)

W.M. LYLES CO., a California )

corporation, and DOES 1 through 100, )

inclusive, )

)

Defendant. )

)

____________________________________)

CIV F 07-1265 AWI GSA

ORDER ON VACATING

DECEMBER 17, 2007,

HEARING AND TAKING 

MOTION TO DISMISS UNDER

SUBMISSION

Currently pending before this Court is Defendant’s Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss. This

motion is set for hearing on December 17, 2007, at 1:30 p.m. The court has reviewed the moving

papers and has determined that this matter is suitable for decision without oral argument. Local 1

Rule 78-230(h). 

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the previously set hearing date of December

17, 2007, is VACATED, and the parties shall not appear at that time. As of December 17, 2007,

Case 1:07-cv-01265-AWI-GSA Document 19 Filed 12/13/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

the Court will take Defendant’s motion to dismiss under submission and will thereafter issue its

decision.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: December 12, 2007 /s/ Anthony W. Ishii 

0m8i78 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:07-cv-01265-AWI-GSA Document 19 Filed 12/13/07 Page 2 of 2