Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_24-cv-00753/USCOURTS-caed-2_24-cv-00753-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Jean Marc Van Den Heuvel
Plaintiff
Robert Van den Heuvel
Defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JEAN MARC VAN DEN HEUVEL,

Plaintiff,

v.

ROBERT VAN DEN HEUVEL,

Defendant.

No. 2:24-cv-00753 DAD CKD (PS)

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

AND ORDER

Plaintiff is proceeding in this action pro se and in forma pauperis. This proceeding was 

referred to this court by Local Rule 302(c)(21).

On April 3, 2024, the undersigned issued an order to show cause why this action should 

not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Plaintiff was advised that failure to allege a proper basis 

for jurisdiction would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. Plaintiff has filed 

a response to the order (ECF No. 6), but it fails to show why this action should not be dismissed 

for lack of jurisdiction.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed for lack of 

jurisdiction.

In light of these recommendations, IT IS ALSO HEREBY ORDERED that all pleading, 

discovery, and motion practice in this action are STAYED pending resolution of the findings and 

recommendations. With the exception of objections to the findings and recommendations and 

Case 2:24-cv-00753-DAD-CKD Document 9 Filed 07/10/24 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

any non-frivolous motions for emergency relief, the court will not entertain or respond to any 

motions and other filings until the findings and recommendations are resolved.

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 

after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections 

with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned “Objections 

to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file 

objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. 

Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

Dated: July 10, 2024

2/vandenheuvel0753.f&rs-nojuris

_____________________________________

CAROLYN K. DELANEY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:24-cv-00753-DAD-CKD Document 9 Filed 07/10/24 Page 2 of 2