Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-03298/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-03298-3/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Edith Dixon
Plaintiff
Monterey Financial Services, Inc.
Defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

EDITH DIXON,

Plaintiff,

v.

MONTEREY FINANCIAL SERVICES, 

INC.,

Defendant.

Case No. 15-cv-03298-MMC 

ORDER VACATING HEARING ON 

DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR 

SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND TO 

STRIKE

Before the Court is defendant Monterey Financial Services, Inc.'s "Motion for 

Summary Judgment [and] to Strike Plaintiff's Class Allegations," filed May 13, 2016. 

Plaintiff Edith Dixon has filed opposition, to which defendant has replied. Having read 

and considered the papers filed in support of and in opposition to the motion, the Court 

deems the matter suitable for determination on the parties' respective written 

submissions, and VACATES the hearing scheduled for June 24, 2016.1

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 17, 2016

MAXINE M. CHESNEY

United States District Judge

 

1

In light thereof, defendant's "Motion on Consent to Appear Telephonically for Oral 

Argument on its Motion for Summary Judgment and Motion to Strike Plaintiff's Class 

Allegations," filed June 13, 2016, is hereby DENIED as moot. For future reference, 

defendant is advised that, although the Court may conduct case management 

conferences by telephone for good cause shown, the Court does not hear disputed 

motions telephonically.

Case 3:15-cv-03298-MMC Document 49 Filed 06/17/16 Page 1 of 1