Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_06-cv-02037/USCOURTS-cand-4_06-cv-02037-2/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Brian Castillo
Plaintiff
Check Recovery Systems, Inc.
Defendant
Imperial Merchant Services
Defendant

Document Text:

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 1

Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment is Docket Nos. 38 and 13, for Case Nos. C-05-4993 MJJ and C-06-

2037 MJJ, respectively. Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgement is Docket No. 53, for Case No. C-05-4993 MJJ.

2

Docket No. 45, filed September 19, 2006.

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

HUNT,

 Plaintiff,

 v.

 CHECK RECOVERY SYSTEMS, INC.,

Defendant. /

No. C05-04993 MJJ

No. C05-02037 MJJ

ORDER REGARDING SUPPLEMENTAL

BRIEFING

Before the Court are Defendant Imperial Merchant Services d.b.a. Check Recovery Systems’

(“Defendant” or “Imperial”) and Plaintiffs Brandy Hunt (“Hunt”) and Brian Castillo’s (“Castillo”)

(collectively, “Plaintiffs”) cross motions for summary judgment.1

 Also before the Court is

Plaintiffs’ Motion to Certify Class.2

 On February 20, 2007, the Court heard oral argument on these

motions and granted the parties leave to file supplemental briefs. 

The content of the parties’ supplemental briefs shall be limited to the issue what categories of

damages are available to named Plaintiffs and unnamed class Plaintiffs under 15 U.S.C. § 1692k. In

particular, whether 1692k allows for actual damages for interest paid by both the named Plaintiffs

and/or the unnamed class Plaintiffs. 

Defendant’s brief, if any, shall be filed by February 27, 2007. Plaintiff’s opposition brief, if

Case 4:06-cv-02037-DMR Document 28 Filed 02/21/07 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

any, shall be filed by March 2, 2007. The parties’ briefs are not to exceed 3 pages in length. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 20 , 2007 

MARTIN J. JENKINS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 4:06-cv-02037-DMR Document 28 Filed 02/21/07 Page 2 of 2