Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca10-91-03046/USCOURTS-ca10-91-03046-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Steven J. Davies
Appellee
Jane Doe
Appellee
John Doe
Appellee
Ray Roberts
Appellee
William Frank Schlicher
Appellant

Document Text:

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

TENTH CIRCUIT 

WILLIAM FRANK SCHLICHER, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

FILED 

United States Co<trt of Appeals 

Tenth circuit 

JUM i991 

ROBERT L. HOECKER 

Clerk 

v . 

RAY ROBERTS, STEVEN J. 

DAVIES, JOHN DOE, and 

JANE DOE, 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

No. 91-3046 

(D.C. No. 90-3507-S) 

(D. Kan.) 

Defendants-Appellees. 

ORDER AND JUDGMENT* 

Before ANDERSON, TACHA, and BRORBY, Circuit Judges. 

After _examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel 

has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially 

assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 

34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The case is therefore ordered 

submitted without oral argument. 

Plaintiff William Schlicher commenced this action pursuant to 

42 u.s.c. § 1983, claiming defendants conspired to "divert/tamper 

with & change Plaintiffs Mailing address" in violation of his 

constitutional rights. Based on this record in this case, the 

district court property concluded plaintiff has failed to present 

* This order and judgment has no precedential value and shall 

not be cited, or used by any court within the Tenth Circuit, 

except for purposes of establishing the doctrines of the law of 

the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. 10th Cir. R. 

36.3. 

Appellate Case: 91-3046 Document: 010110118070 Date Filed: 06/03/1991 Page: 1 
an arguable factual or legal basis for imposing liability against 

the defendants. We find no evidence of any misconduct by the 

district judge in this case. 

Because we find plaintiff has neither raised a reasoned 

argument on the law and facts, Coppedge Y.!.. United States, 369 U.S. 

438 (1962), nor demonstrated the issues raised are debatable among 

jurists, Barefoot Y.!.. Estelle, 463 U.S. 880 (1983), we deny 

certificate of probable cause and the motion to proceed in forma 

pauperis. The appeal is DISMISSED. All pending motions are 

DENIED. The mandate shall issue forthwith. 

-2-

ENTERED FOR THE COURT 

Deanell Reece Tacha 

Circuit Judge 

Appellate Case: 91-3046 Document: 010110118070 Date Filed: 06/03/1991 Page: 2