Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_23-cv-01639/USCOURTS-caed-2_23-cv-01639-8/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Donovan Chad Brevik
Petitioner
Charles Schuyler
Respondent

Document Text:

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

DONOVAN CHAD BREVIK, 

Petitioner, 

v. 

CHARLES SCHUYLER, 

Respondent. 

No. 2:23-cv-01639-KJM-EFB (HC) 

ORDER 

Petitioner proceeds without counsel in this petition for writ of habeas under 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2254. On August 5, 2024, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which 

were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the 

findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. ECF No. 6. Neither party 

has filed objections. 

 The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 

602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed 

de novo. See Robbins v. Carey, 481 F.3d 1143, 1147 (9th Cir. 2007) (“[D]eterminations of law 

by the magistrate judge are reviewed de novo by both the district court and [the appellate] court 

. . . .”). Having reviewed the file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be 

supported by the record and by the proper analysis. 

 ///// 

Case 2:23-cv-01639-DC-EFB Document 46 Filed 10/04/24 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 

 1. The findings and recommendations filed August 5, 2024 (ECF No. 43), are adopted in 

full; 

 2. Respondent’s motion to dismiss (ECF No. 29) is DENIED AS MOOT; 

 3. Petitioner’s Second Amended Petition (ECF No. 39) is deemed the operative pleading 

in this action; 

 4. Respondent shall file and serve a response to the Second Amended Petition within 60 

days of the date of this order, accompanied by all transcripts or other documents relevant to the 

determination of the issues presented by the petition. See Rules Governing § 2254 Cases in the 

U.S. District Courts, Rules 4 & 5; and 

 5. Petitioner shall file and serve a reply, if any, within 30 days of service of an answer. 

DATED: October 3, 2024. 

Case 2:23-cv-01639-DC-EFB Document 46 Filed 10/04/24 Page 2 of 2