Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_11-cv-00868/USCOURTS-caed-2_11-cv-00868-4/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Commissioner of Social Security
Defendant
Antoinette Darlene Gazzano
Plaintiff

Document Text:

Stip. and Prop. Order for Remand; 2:11-cv-00868-DAD

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

DONNA L. CALVERT

Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX

Social Security Administration

LYNN M. HARADA, CSBN 267616

Special Assistant United States Attorney

160 Spear Street, Suite 800

San Francisco, California 94105

Telephone: (415) 977-8977

Facsimile: (415) 744-0134

E-Mail: Lynn.Harada@ssa.gov

Attorneys for Defendant

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ANTOINETTE DARLENE GAZZANO,

Plaintiff,

vs.

CAROLYN W. COLVIN,

Acting Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. 2:11-cv-00868-DAD

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR 

REMAND PURSUANT TO SENTENCE 

FOUR OF 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), AND 

REQUEST FOR ENTRY OF JUDGMENT 

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties, through their respective 

counsel of record and with the approval of the Court, that this action be remanded to the 

Commissioner of Social Security for further administrative proceedings pursuant to sentence 

four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).

Upon remand, the Appeals Council will instruct the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) to

obtain supplemental evidence from a vocational expert to determine whether jobs exist in 

Case 2:11-cv-00868-AC Document 31 Filed 07/20/15 Page 1 of 3
Stip. and Prop. Order for Remand; 2:11-cv-00868-DAD

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

significant numbers in the national economy that Plaintiff can perform considering her age, 

education, work experience, and residual functional capacity.

The parties further request that the Clerk of the Court be directed to enter a final 

judgment in favor of Plaintiff, and against Defendant, reversing the final decision of the 

Commissioner. As noted, this stipulation constitutes a remand under the fourth sentence of 

Section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).

Respectfully submitted, 

Dated: July 14, 2015 /s/ Lynn M. Harada for Robert Weems*____

(*as authorized via email on 7/13/15)

ROBERT WEEMS

Attorney for Plaintiff

Dated: July 14, 2015 BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

DONNA L. CALVERT

Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX

Social Security Administration

By: /s/ Lynn M. Harada 

LYNN M. HARADA

Special Assistant U.S. Attorney

Attorneys for Defendant

Case 2:11-cv-00868-AC Document 31 Filed 07/20/15 Page 2 of 3
Stip. and Prop. Order for Remand; 2:11-cv-00868-DAD

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Pursuant to the parties’ stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 17, 2015

Ddad1\orders.soc sec

gazzano0868.stip.remand.ord.docx

Case 2:11-cv-00868-AC Document 31 Filed 07/20/15 Page 3 of 3