Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-arwd-5_06-cv-05186/USCOURTS-arwd-5_06-cv-05186-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Benton County Jail
Defendant
Oscar Soto
Plaintiff

Document Text:

AO72A

(Rev. 8/82)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS

FAYETTEVILLE DIVISION

OSCAR SOTO PLAINTIFF

v. Civil No. 06-5186

 

BENTON COUNTY JAIL DEFENDANT

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Oscar Soto filed this pro se civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on September

29, 2006. His complaint was filed in forma pauperis (IFP). 

On November 3, 2006, the undersigned entered an order (Doc. 5) directing Soto to

complete, sign and return an attached addendum to his complaint. The addendum was to be

returned by December 4, 2006. To date, the plaintiff has failed to respond to the addendum. The

court’s order and attached addendum have not been returned as undeliverable. The order was

mailed to the same address as the court’s prior orders. 

Plaintiff has not sought an extension of time to respond to the addendum. Plaintiff has not

communicated with the court.

I therefore recommend Soto’s claims be dismissed on the grounds he has failed to

prosecute this action and comply with the order of the court. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). Soto has

ten days from receipt of the report and recommendation in which to file written objections

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). The failure to file timely objections may result in waiver

of the right to appeal questions of fact. Soto is reminded that objections must be both timely

and specific to trigger de novo review by the district court.

DATED this 21st day of December.

/s/ Beverly Stites Jones 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 5:06-cv-05186-JLH Document 6 Filed 12/21/06 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: <pageID>