Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca11-14-13319/USCOURTS-ca11-14-13319-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Johnathan Bergren
Appellant
United States of America
Appellee

Document Text:

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 14-13319

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D.C. Docket No. 8:13-cr-00463-CEH-TBM-1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff-Appellee,

 versus

JOHNATHAN BERGREN, 

 Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Florida

________________________

(July 20, 2015)

Before WILLIAM PRYOR, JULIE CARNES and JILL PRYOR, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: 

USCA11 Case: 14-13319 Date Filed: 07/20/2015 Page: 1 of 2
2

Ron Smith, appointed counsel for Johnathan Bergren in this direct criminal 

appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and 

filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 

L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that 

counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because 

independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, 

counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Bergren’s conviction and 

sentence are AFFIRMED. However, the judgment of conviction contains a 

clerical error, identifying Bergren’s conviction as a violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1349, 

instead of 18 U.S.C. § 1349, as charged in Count One of the superseding 

indictment. Accordingly, the judgment is VACATED and REMANDED to the 

district court for the limited purpose of correcting this clerical error. See United 

States v. Massey, 443 F.3d 814, 822 (11th Cir. 2006). 

USCA11 Case: 14-13319 Date Filed: 07/20/2015 Page: 2 of 2