Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca10-14-03272/USCOURTS-ca10-14-03272-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Karla Monroy Murillo
Appellant
United States of America
Appellee

Document Text:

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT 

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff - Appellee, 

v. 

KARLA MONROY MURILLO, 

 Defendant - Appellant. 

No. 14-3272 

(D.C. No. 2:12-CR-20153-CM-2) 

(D. Kan.)

 

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

 

Before BRISCOE, Chief Judge, MATHESON and MORITZ, Circuit Judges. 

 

 The government moves to enforce the plea agreement, containing an appeal 

waiver, it entered into with Karla Monroy Murillo. Ms. Monroy Murillo does not 

oppose enforcement of the appeal waiver. Indeed, she requests that this court enforce 

the plea agreement and appeal waiver and dismiss her appeal. After independently 

considering the plea agreement and plea and sentencing hearing transcripts in light of 

the three-prong analysis set forth in United States v. Hahn, 359 F.3d 1315, 1325 

 

* This panel has determined that oral argument would not materially assist the 

determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The 

case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument. This order and judgment 

is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, 

and collateral estoppel. It may be cited, however, for its persuasive value consistent 

with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 and 10th Cir. R. 32.1. 

FILED 

United States Court of Appeals 

Tenth Circuit 

March 20, 2015

Elisabeth A. Shumaker 

Clerk of Court

Appellate Case: 14-3272 Document: 01019402404 Date Filed: 03/20/2015 Page: 1 
- 2 - 

(10th Cir. 2004) (en banc) (per curiam), we conclude that the motion to enforce 

should be granted. 

 Accordingly, we grant the government’s motion to enforce and dismiss this 

appeal. 

 Entered for the Court 

 Per Curiam 

Appellate Case: 14-3272 Document: 01019402404 Date Filed: 03/20/2015 Page: 2