Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_16-cv-02597/USCOURTS-caed-2_16-cv-02597-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Larry Maestas
Plaintiff
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Defendant

Document Text:

1 

 2 

 3 

 4 

 5 

 6 

 7 

 8 

 9 

 10 

 11 

 12 

 13 

 14 

 15 

 16 

 17 

 18 

 19 

 20 

 21 

 22 

 23 

 24 

 25 

 26 

 27 

LTL ATTORNEYS LLP 

Eugene Hahm (SBN 167596) 

 eugene.hahm@ltlattorneys.com 

James M. Lee (SBN 192301) 

 james.lee@ltlattorneys.com 

300 S. Grand Avenue, 14th Floor 

Los Angeles, California 90017 

Tel.: 213-612-8900 

Fax: 213-612-3773 

Attorneys for Defendant 

WAL-MART STORES, INC. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

LARRY MAESTAS, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

WAL-MART STORES, INC., 

Defendant. 

CASE NO.: 2:16−CV−02597−KJM−KJN

STIPULATION AND ORDER RE: 

PLAINTIFF’S FIRST AMENDED 

COMPLAINT AND EXTENDING 

DEFENDANT’S TIME TO RESPOND

TO PLAINTIFF’S FIRST AMENDED 

COMPLAINT 

Complaint served: November 17, 2016 

Current response date: January 5, 2017 

First Amended Complaint submission 

date: January 13, 2017 

 

 

Case 2:16-cv-02597-KJM-KJN Document 7 Filed 01/06/17 Page 1 of 3
 

 1 

 2 

 3 

 4 

 5 

 6 

 7 

 8 

 9 

 10 

 11 

 12 

 13 

 14 

 15 

 16 

 17 

 18 

 19 

 20 

 21 

 22 

 23 

 24 

 25 

 26 

 27 

 28 

2 

Plaintiff Larry Maestas (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 

(“Defendant”) hereby stipulate as follows: 

1. On November 17, 2016, Plaintiff served its summons and complaint on 

Defendant. 

2. On December 5, 2016, pursuant to Local Rule 144, the parties filed a 

stipulation extending Defendant’s deadline respond to Plaintiff’s complaint until 

January 5, 2017 (Dkt. No. 5). 

3. On December 15, 2016, pursuant to the Court’s standing order (Dkt. 

No. 3-1, p. 3), the parties met and conferred regarding Defendant’s intention to file a 

pleadings motion as its response to Plaintiff’s complaint. 

4. In the interest of judicial economy, and to avoid any unnecessary 

motion practice, the parties agreed that Plaintiff would submit an amended 

complaint to address Defendant’s contentions by no later than January 13, 2017, and 

that Defendant’s response would be due thirty (30) days after the filing of the 

amended complaint. 

5. This is the parties’ second request to extend Defendant’s time to 

respond to Plaintiff’s complaint. 

NOW, THEREFORE, by and through their respective counsel of record, the 

parties hereby stipulate and agree that Plaintiff shall file a first amended complaint in 

Case No. 2:16−CV−02597−KJM−KJN by no later than January 13, 2017, and 

Defendant’s response to Plaintiff’s first amended complaint shall be due no later 

than thirty (30) days after the filing of the amended complaint. 

/// 

/// 

/// 

/// 

/// 

/// 

Case 2:16-cv-02597-KJM-KJN Document 7 Filed 01/06/17 Page 2 of 3
 

 1 

 2 

 3 

 4 

 5 

 6 

 7 

 8 

 9 

 10 

 11 

 12 

 13 

 14 

 15 

 16 

 17 

 18 

 19 

 20 

 21 

 22 

 23 

 24 

 25 

 26 

 27 

 28 

3 

DATED: January 4, 2017 LTL ATTORNEYS LLP 

 

By /s/ James M. Lee 

Eugene Hahm 

James M. Lee 

Attorneys for Defendant 

Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 

DATED: January 4, 2017 LAW OFFICES OF TODD M. FRIEDMAN, P.C. 

 

By /s/ Todd M. Friedman (as authorized on 01/04/2017)

Todd M. Friedman 

Attorney for Plaintiff 

Larry Maestas 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED: 

Dated: January 5, 2017. 

Case 2:16-cv-02597-KJM-KJN Document 7 Filed 01/06/17 Page 3 of 3