Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-04269/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-04269-2/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
William Burke
Defendant
City of Oakland
Defendant
Lionel Jermon
Plaintiff
Maureen Vergara
Defendant
Richard Word
Defendant

Document Text:

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

 

JOHN L. BURRIS, ESQ. - State Bar #69888 

LAW OFFICES OF JOHN L. BURRIS 

7677 Oakport Street, Suite 1120 

Oakland, California 94621 

Telephone: (510) 839-5200 Fax: (510) 839-3882 

GAYLA B. LIBET, Esq. - State Bar #109173 

LAW OFFICES OF GAYLA B. LIBET 

486 41st Street, # 3 Oakland, CA 94609 

Telephone and Fax: (510) 420-0324 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

Lionel Jermon 

JOHN A. RUSSO, City Attorney - State Bar #129729 

RANDOLPH W. HALL, Chief Assistant City Attorney - State Bar #080142 RACHEL WAGNER., Supervising Trial Attorney - State Bar #127246 

PELAYO A. LLAMAS, JR., Deputy City Attorney - State Bar #162046 One Frank H. Ogawa Plaza, 6th Floor 

Oakland, California 94612 

Telephone: (510) 238-6621 Fax: (510) 238-6500 

24650/372465 

Attorneys for Defendants 

City of Oakland, Richard Word 

Maureen Vergara and William Burke 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

LIONEL JERMON, 

 Plaintiff, 

 vs. 

CITY OF OAKLAND, a municipal corporation; 

RICHARD WORD, in his capacity as Chief of 

Police for the CITY OF OAKLAND; MAUREEN 

VERGARA, individually, and in her capacity as 

an Oakland police officer; WILLIAM BURKE, 

individually, and in his capacity as an Oakland 

police officer; and DOES 1 through 25, inclusive, 

 Defendants. 

Case No. C-05-04269-EMC 

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER

Plaintiff LIONEL JERMON, and his attorneys, JOHN L. BURRIS individually 

and on behalf of The LAW OFFICES OF JOHN L. BURRIS, and GAYLA B. LIBET 

Case 3:05-cv-04269-EMC Document 18 Filed 05/16/06 Page 1 of 15
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

STPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 2 C-05-04269-EMC 

individually and on behalf of The LAW OFFICES OF GAYLA B. LIBET, and Defendants 

CITY OF OAKLAND, RICHARD WORD, in his official capacity as Chief of Police for the 

CITY OF OAKLAND, and MAUREEN VERGARA and WILLIAM BURKE, individually and 

in their capacities as Police Officers for the City of Oakland by and through their attorney 

PELAYO A. LLAMAS, JR. of the Oakland City Attorney’s Office, hereby stipulate to the 

following protective order: 

1. DEFINITIONS

 1.1 Party: any party to this action, including all of its officers, directors, 

employees, consultants, retained experts, and outside counsel (and their support staff). 

 1.2 Disclosure or Discovery Material: all items or information, regardless 

of the medium or manner generated, stored, or maintained (including, among other things, 

testimony, transcripts, or tangible things) that are produced or generated in disclosures or 

responses to discovery in this matter. 

 1.3 “Confidential” Information or Items: information (regardless of how 

generated, stored or maintained) or tangible things qualify for protection under standards 

developed under F.R.Civ. P. 26(c). This material includes, but is not limited to: 

a) Copies of certain Oakland Police Department personnel files 

 for OFFICERS MAUREEN VERGARA and WILLIAM BURKE 

 for a period covering the commencement date of their 

 respective employment with the Oakland Police Department 

 through and including September 18, 2004. 

b) Copies of certain internal affairs files pertaining to complaints 

 of use of excessive force or unnecessary force, truthfulness, 

 racially motivated misconduct and wrongful arrest or detention 

 for OFFICERS MAUREEN VERGARA and WILLIAM BURKE 

 for a period September 18, 1999 through September 18, 2004 

 as listed in Exhibit B hereto. 

 c) Any internal affairs files pertaining to the incident which is 

 alleged in the complaint on file in this action. 

/// 

Case 3:05-cv-04269-EMC Document 18 Filed 05/16/06 Page 2 of 15
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

STPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 3 C-05-04269-EMC 

 1.4 “Highly Confidential-Attorneys’ Eyes Only” Information or Items: 

extremely sensitive “Confidential Information or Items” whose disclosure to another Party 

or non-party would create a substantial risk of serious injury that could not be avoided by 

less restrictive means. 

 1.5 Receiving Party: a Party that receives Disclosure or Discovery 

Material from a Producing Party. 

 1.6 Producing Party: a Party or non-party that produces Disclosure or 

Discovery Material in this action. 

 1.7. Designating Party: a Party or non-party that designates information or 

items that it produces in disclosures or in responses to discovery as “Confidential” or 

“Highly Confidential-Attorneys Eyes Only.” 

 1.8. Protected Material: any Disclosure or Discovery Material that is 

designated as “Confidential” or as “Highly Confidential-Attorneys’ Eyes Only.” 

 1.9. Outside Counsel: attorneys who are not employees of a Party but 

who are retained to represent or advise a Party in this action. 

 1.10. House Counsel: attorneys who are employees of a Party. 

 1.11 Counsel (without qualifier): Outside Counsel and House Counsel (as 

well as their support staffs). 

 1.12. Expert: a person with specialized knowledge or experience in a 

matter pertinent to the litigation who has been retained by a Party or its Counsel to serve 

as an expert witness or as an consultant n this action and who is not a past or a current 

employee of a Party and who, at the time of retention, is not anticipated to become an 

employee of a Party. This definition includes a professional jury or trial consultant retained 

in connection with this litigation. 

/// 

/// 

Case 3:05-cv-04269-EMC Document 18 Filed 05/16/06 Page 3 of 15
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

STPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 4 C-05-04269-EMC 

 1.13 Professional Vendors: person or entities that provide litigation support 

services (e.g., photocopying: videotaping; translating; preparing exhibits or 

demonstrations; organizing, storing, retrieving data in any form or medium; etc.) and their 

employees and subcontractors. 

2. SCOPE

The protections conferred by this Stipulation and Order cover not only 

Protected Material (as defined above), but also any information copied or extracted 

therefrom, as well as all copies, excerpts, summaries, or compilations thereof, plus 

testimony, conversations, or presentations by parties or counsel to or in court or in other 

settings that might reveal Protected Material. 

3. DURATION

Even after the termination of this litigation, the confidentiality obligations 

imposed by this Order shall remain in effect until a Designating Party agrees otherwise in 

writing or court order otherwise directs. 

4. DESIGNATING PROTECTED MATERIAL

4.1 F.R.Civ. P. 26(c). The information sought to be protected must be 

properly qualified for protection under F.R.Civ. P. 26(c). Counsel shall not designate any 

discovery material “CONFIDENTIAL” without first making a good faith determination that 

protection is warranted. 

4.2 Manner and Timing of Designations. Except as otherwise provided in 

this Order (see, e.g., second paragraph of section 4.2(a), below), or as otherwise 

stipulated or ordered, material that qualified for protection under the Order must be clearly 

so designated before the material is disclosed or produced. 

Designation in conformity with this Order requires: 

 (a) for information in documentary form (apart from transcripts of 

depositions or other pretrial or trial proceedings), that the Producing Party affix the legend 

Case 3:05-cv-04269-EMC Document 18 Filed 05/16/06 Page 4 of 15
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

STPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 5 C-05-04269-EMC 

“CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL-ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” at the top of 

each page that contains protected material. 

A Party or non-party that makes original documents or materials available for 

inspection need not designate them for protection until after the inspecting Party has 

indicated which material it would like copied and produced. During the inspection and 

before the designation, all of the material made available for inspection shall be deemed 

“HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL—ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY.” After the inspecting Party has 

identified the documents it wants copied and produced, the Producing Party must 

determine which documents, or portions thereof, qualify for protection under this Order, 

then, before producing the specified documents, the Producing Party must affix the 

appropriate legend (“CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL-ATTORNEYS’ EYES 

ONLY”) at the top of each page that contains Protected Material. If only a portion or 

portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must 

clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the 

margins) and must specify, for each portion, the level of protection being asserted (either 

“CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL—ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY”). 

 (b) for testimony given in deposition or in other pretrial or trial 

proceedings, that the Party or non-party offering or sponsoring the testimony identify on 

the record, before the close of the deposition, hearing, or other proceeding, all protected 

testimony, and further specify any portions of the testimony that qualify as “HIGHLY 

CONFIDENTIAL —ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY.” When it is impractical to identify 

separately each portion of testimony that is entitled to protection, the Party or non-party 

that sponsors, offers, or gives the testimony may invoke on the record (before the 

deposition or proceeding ins concluded) a right to have up to 20 days to identify the 

specify the level of protection being asserted (“CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY 

CONFIDENTIAL—ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY”). Only those portions of the testimony that 

Case 3:05-cv-04269-EMC Document 18 Filed 05/16/06 Page 5 of 15
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

STPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 6 C-05-04269-EMC 

are appropriately designated for protection within the 20 days shall be covered by the 

provisions of this Stipulated Protective Order. 

Transcript pages containing Protected Material must be separately bound by 

the court reporter, who must affix to the top of each such page the legend 

“CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL—ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY,” as 

instructed by the Party or non-party offering or sponsoring the witness or presenting the 

testimony. 

 ( c) for information produced in some form other than 

documentary, and for any other tangible items, that the Producing Party affix in a 

prominent place on the exterior of the container or containers in which the information or 

item is stored the legend “CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL—ATTORNEYS’ 

EYES ONLY.” 

4.3. Inadvertent Failures to Designate. If timely corrected, an inadvertent 

failure to designate qualified information or items as “Confidential” or “Highly 

Confidential—Attorneys’ Eyes Only” does not, standing alone, waive the Designating 

Party’s right to secure protection under this Order for such material. If material is 

appropriately designated as “Confidential” or “Highly Confidential—Attorneys’ Eyes Only” 

after the material was initially produced, the Receiving Party, on timely notification of the 

designation, must make reasonable efforts to assure that the material is treated in 

accordance with the provisions of the Order. 

5. CHALLENGING CONFIDENTIALITY DESIGNATIONS

5.1 Timing of Challenges. Unless a proper challenge to a Designating 

Party’s confidentially designation is necessary to avoid foreseeable substantial unfairness, 

unnecessary economic burden, or a later significant disruption or delay of the litigation, a 

Party does not waive its right to challenge a confidentiality designation by electing not to 

mount a challenge promptly after the original designation is disclosed. 

Case 3:05-cv-04269-EMC Document 18 Filed 05/16/06 Page 6 of 15
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

STPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 7 C-05-04269-EMC 

5.2 Meet and Confer. A Party that elects to initiate a challenge to a 

Designating Party’s confidentiality designation must do so in good faith and must begin the 

process by conferring directly (in voice to voice dialogue; other forms of communication 

are not sufficient) with counsel for the Designating Party. In conferring, the challenging 

Party must explain the basis for its belief that the confidentiality designation was not 

proper and must give the Designating Party an opportunity to review the designated 

material, to reconsider the circumstances, and, if no change in designation is offered, to 

explain the basis for the chose designation. A challenging Party may proceed to the next 

stage of the challenge process only if it has engaged in this meet and confer process first. 

5.3 Judicial Intervention. A Party that elects to press a challenge to a 

confidentiality designation after considering the justification offered by the Designating 

Party may file and serve a motion under Civil Rule 7 (and in compliance with Civil Local 

Rule 79-5, if applicable) that identifies the challenged material and sets forth in detail the 

basis for the challenge. Each such motion must be accompanied by a competent 

declaration that affirms that the movant has complied with the meet and confer 

requirements imposed in the preceding paragraph and that sets forth with specificity the 

justification for the confidentiality designation that was given by the Designating Party in 

the meet and confer dialogue. 

The burden of persuasion in any such challenge proceeding shall be on the 

Designating Party. Until the court rules on the challenge, all parties shall continue to 

afford the material in question the level of protection tow which it is entitled under the 

Producing Party’s designation. 

6. ACCESS TO AND USE OF PROTECTED MATERIAL

6.1 Basic Principles. A Receiving Party may use Protected Material that 

is disclosed or produced by another Party or by a non-party in connection with this case 

only for prosecuting, defending, or attempting to settle this litigation. Said Protected 

Case 3:05-cv-04269-EMC Document 18 Filed 05/16/06 Page 7 of 15
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

STPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 8 C-05-04269-EMC 

Material may be disclosed only to the categories of persons and under the conditions 

described in this Order. When the litigation has terminated, a Receiving Party must 

comply with the provisions of section 10, below (FINAL DISPOSITION). 

Protected Material must be stored and maintained by a Receiving Party at a 

location and in a secure manner that ensures that access is limited to the persons 

authorized under this Order. 

6.2 Disclosure of “CONFIDENTIAL: Information or Items. Unless 

otherwise ordered by the court or permitted in writing by the Designating Party, a 

Receiving Party may disclose any information or item designated CONFIDENTIAL only to: 

 (a) employees of the Receiving Party to whom disclosure is 

reasonably necessary for this litigation and who have signed the “Agreement to Be Bound 

by Protective Order” (Exhibit A); 

 (b) experts (as defined in this Order) of the Receiving Party to 

whom disclosure is reasonably necessary for this litigation and who have signed the 

“Agreement to Be Bound by Protective Order” (Exhibit A); 

 (c) the Court and its personnel; 

 (d) court reporters, their staffs, and professional venders to whom 

disclosure is reasonably necessary for this litigation and who have signed the “Agreement 

to Be Bound by Protective Order” (Exhibit A); 

 (e) during their deposition, witnesses in the action to whom 

disclosure is reasonably necessary and who have signed the “Agreement to Be Bound by 

Protective Order” (Exhibit A). Pages of transcribed deposition testimony or exhibits to 

depositions that reveal Protected Material must be separately bound by the court reporter 

and may not be disclosed to anyone except as permitted under this Stipulated Protective 

Order. 

 (f) the author the document or the original source of the 

Case 3:05-cv-04269-EMC Document 18 Filed 05/16/06 Page 8 of 15
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

STPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 9 C-05-04269-EMC 

information. 

6.3 Disclosure of “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL—ATTORNEYS’ EYES 

ONLY” Information or Items. Unless otherwise ordered by the court or permitted in writing 

by the Designating Party, Receiving Party may disclose any information or item 

designated “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL—ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” only to: 

 (a) Experts (as defined in this Order) (1) to whom disclosure is 

reasonably necessary for this litigation, who have signed the “Agreement to Be Bound by 

Protective Order” (Exhibit A); 

 (b) the Court and it’s personnel; 

 (c) court reporters, their staffs, and professional vendors to whom 

disclosure is reasonably necessary for this litigation and who have signed the “Agreement 

to Be Bound by Protective Order” (Exhibit A); and 

 (d) the author of the document or the original source of the 

information. 

7. PROTECTED MATERIAL SUBPOENAED OR ORDERED 

PRODUCED IN OTHER LITIGATION. 

 If a Receiving Party is served with a subpoena or an order issued in other 

litigation that would compel disclosure of any information or items designated in this action 

as “CONFIDENTIAL” or HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL—ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY,” the 

Receiving Party must so notify the Designating Party, in writing (by fax, if possible) 

immediately and in no event more than three court days after receiving the subpoena or 

order. Such notification must include a copy of the subpoena or court order. 

 The Receiving Party also must immediately inform in writing the Party who 

caused the subpoena or order to issue in the other litigation that some or all the material 

covered by the subpoena or order is the subject of this Protective Order. In addition, the 

Receiving Party must deliver a copy of this Stipulated Protective Order promptly to the 

Case 3:05-cv-04269-EMC Document 18 Filed 05/16/06 Page 9 of 15
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

STPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 10 C-05-04269-EMC 

Party in the other action that caused the subpoena or order to issue. 

 The purpose of imposing these duties is to alert the interested parties to the 

existence of this Protective Order and to afford the Designation Party in this case an 

opportunity to try to protect its confidentiality interests in the court from which the 

subpoena or order issued. The Designating Party shall bear the burdens and the 

expenses of seeking protection in that court of its confidential material—and nothing in 

these provisions should be construed as authorizing or encouraging a Receiving Party in 

this action to disobey a lawful directive from another court. 

8. UNAUTHORIZED DISCLOSURE OF PROTECTED MATERIAL

If a Receiving Party learns that, by inadvertence or otherwise, it has 

disclosed Protected Material to any person or in any circumstance not authorized under 

this Stipulated Protective Order, the Receiving Party must immediately (a) notify in writing 

the Designating Party of the unauthorized disclosures, (b) use its best efforts to retrieve all 

copies of the Protected Material, (c) inform the person or persons to whom unauthorized 

disclosures were made of all of the terms of this Order, and (d) request such person or 

persons to execute the “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound” that is attached 

hereto as Exhibit A. 

 9. FILING PROTECTED MATERIAL. Without written permission from 

the Designating Party or a court order secured after appropriate notice to all interested 

persons, a Party may not file, in the public record in this action, any Protected material. A 

Party that seeks to file under seal any Protected Material must comply with Civil Local 

Rule 79-5. In addition to placing the documents in a sealed envelope with instructions that 

the envelope is not to be opened absent further order of the court, the envelope should be 

labeled to identify title of the case, the case number, and the title of the document. 

 10. FINAL DISPOSITION. Unless otherwise ordered or agreed in writing 

by the Producing Party, within ten days after the final termination of this action in the 

Case 3:05-cv-04269-EMC Document 18 Filed 05/16/06 Page 10 of 15
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

STPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 11 C-05-04269-EMC 

District Court, each Receiving Party must return all Protected Material to the Producing 

Party, as used in this subdivision, “all Protected Material” includes all copies, abstracts, 

compilations, summaries or any other form of reproducing or capturing any of the 

Protected Material. With permission in writing from the Designating Party, the Receiving 

Party may destroy some or all of the Protected Material instead of returning it. Whether 

the Protected Material is returned or destroyed, the Receiving Party must submit a written 

certification to the Producing Party (and, if not the same person or entity, to the 

Designating Party) by the ten day deadline that identifies (by category, where appropriate) 

all the Protected Material that was returned or destroyed and that affirms that the 

Receiving Party has not retained any copies, abstracts, compilations, summaries or other 

forms of reproducing or capturing any of the Protected Material. Notwithstanding this 

provision, Counsel are entitled to retain an archival copy of all pleadings, motion papers, 

transcripts, legal memoranda, correspondence or attorney work product, even if such 

materials contain Protected Material. Any such archival copies that contain or constitute 

Protected Material remain subject to this Protective Order as set forth in Section 3 

(DURATION), above. 

 11. MISCELLANEOUS

 Right to Further Relief. Nothing in this Order abridges the right of any 

person to seek its modification by the Court in the future. 

 12. JURISDICTION. The Court shall retain jurisdiction over any matter 

covered by this Stipulation and Order for 24 months after the final termination of this 

action. 

/// 

/// 

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

Case 3:05-cv-04269-EMC Document 18 Filed 05/16/06 Page 11 of 15
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

STPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 12 C-05-04269-EMC 

DATED: May 12, 2006 LAW OFFICES OF JOHN L. BURRIS 

 //s//JOHN L. BURRIS 

 JOHN L. BURRIS 

 

 Attorneys for Plaintiff 

 Lionel Jermon 

DATED: May 12, 2006 

 LAW OFFICES OF GAYLA B. LIBET 

 //s//GAYLA B. LIBET 

 GAYLA B. LIBET 

 Attorneys for Plaintiff 

 Lionel Jermon 

DATED: May 12, 2006 OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY 

 

 By://s//PELAYO A. LLAMAS, JR. 

 PELAYO A. LLAMAS, JR. 

 Attorneys for Defendants 

 City of Oakland, Richard Word 

 Maureen Vergara and William Burke 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED:______________ 

 ___________________________________ 

 EDWARD M. CHEN

 United States Magistrate Judge 

Case 3:05-cv-04269-EMC Document 18 Filed 05/16/06 Page 12 of 15
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

STPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 13 C-05-04269-EMC 

EXHIBIT A

ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND AGREEMENT TO BE BOUND

 I, __________________________ [print or type full name], of 

________________________________[print or type full address], declare under penalty 

of perjury that I have read in its entirety and understand the Stipulated Protective Order 

that was issued by the United States Court for the Northern District of California on 

______________________[date] in the case of LIONEL JERMON v. CITY OF OAKLAND,

et. al., Case No. C-05-04269-EMC. I agree to comply with and be bound by all the terms 

of this Stipulated Protective Order and I understand and acknowledge that failure to so 

comply could expose me to sanctions and punishment in the nature of contempt. I 

solemnly promise that I will not disclose in any manner any information or item that is 

subject to this Stipulated Protective Order to any person or entity except in strict 

compliance with the provisions of this Order. 

 I further agree to submit to the jurisdiction of the United States District for the 

Northern District of California for the purpose of enforcing the terms of this Stipulated 

Protective Order, even if such enforcement proceedings occur after termination of this 

action. 

 I hereby appoint_______________________________ [print or type full 

name] of ___________________________________________ [print or type full address 

and telephone number] as my California agent for service of process in connection with 

this action or any proceedings related to enforcement of this Stipulated Protective Order. 

Date:_____________________ 

City and State where sworn and signed:___________________________ 

Printed name:_______________________________- 

Signature:_________________________________ 

 [signature} 

Case 3:05-cv-04269-EMC Document 18 Filed 05/16/06 Page 13 of 15
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

STPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 14 C-05-04269-EMC 

EXHIBIT B 

The following Oakland Police Department Personnel Department and Internal Affairs 

Investigations files will be produced pursuant to the protections of this Order: 

FILE NAME BATES NUMBER No. of 

Pages 

A-JERMON V. C/O 

1-Burke Personnel C/O File

1-PF – Office of Personnel OAK 1- OAK 52 52 

2-PF – OPD Personnel OAK 53 - OAK 167 115 

1-Burke IA Files

1-Dotson/Spears, #02-259 OAK 168 - OAK 228 61 

2-Harris, Lee, #03-187 OAK 229 - OAK 283 55 

3-Lambert, Arrous, #04-121 OAK 284 - OAK 363 80 

4-King, Lisa, #04-417 OAK 364 - OAK 410 47 

1-Burke CPRB Files

1-Dotson/Spears, #02-051 OAK 411 - OAK 634 224 

2-King, Lisa, #04-417 OAK 635 - OAK 673 39 

1-Burke Training Activity

1-OPD Training Record OAK 674 - OAK 678 5 

2-Vergara Personnel C/O File

1-PF – Office of Personnel OAK 679 - OAK 730 52 

2-PF – OPD Personnel OAK 731 - OAK 851 121 

2-Vergara IA Files

1-Bushboom, Gary, #04-329 OAK 852 - OAK 969 138 

2-Brooks, Antonio, #04-233 OAK 970 - OAK 1104 135 

2-Vergara Training Activity

Case 3:05-cv-04269-EMC Document 18 Filed 05/16/06 Page 14 of 15
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

STPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 15 C-05-04269-EMC 

1-OPD Training Record OAK 1105 - OAK 1108 4 

3-Subject IA Complaint File

1-IA Complaint File, #05-731 OAK 1109 - OAK 1270 162 

Case 3:05-cv-04269-EMC Document 18 Filed 05/16/06 Page 15 of 15