Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca10-07-01375/USCOURTS-ca10-07-01375-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
James E. Abbott
Appellee
Maryann Alessi
Appellee
Bautista
Appellee
Cella
Appellee
Alexander N. Garcia
Appellant
Johnson
Appellee
Patracio Manzanares
Appellee
Massee
Appellee
Kevin Milyard
Appellee
Delores Montoya
Appellee
Mullay
Appellee
Joe Ortiz
Appellee
Rorick
Appellee
Sheila
Appellee
Tanya Social Worker (ACC), in her official capacity
Appellee
H. Williams
Appellee
Carl Zennon
Appellee

Document Text:

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

ALEXANDER N. GARCIA,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

JOE ORTIZ, Executive Director of

D.O.C., in his official capacity;

RORICK, Correctional Officer,

(CTCF), in his official capacity;

JOHNSON, Correctional Officer,

(CTCF), in his official capacity; H.

WILLIAMS, Correctional Officer,

(CTCF), in his official capacity;

CELLA, Sargent, Correctional Officer,

(CTCF), in his official capacity;

MULLAY, Sargent Correctional

Officer, (CTCF), in his official

capacity; SHEILA, (Doe), Nurse

Practitioner, (CTCF), in her official

capacity; JAMES E. ABBOTT,

Warden (CTCF), in his official

capacity; KEVIN MILYARD,

Associate Warden (CTCF), in his

official capacity; TANYA SOCIAL

WORKER (ACC), in her official

capacity; MARYANN ALESSI, Nurse

Practitioner (ACC), in her official

capacity; DR. BAUTISTA, Doctor

(ACC), in his official capacity;

DELORES MONTOYA, Health

Service Admin, (ACC), in her official

capacity; PATRACIO

MANZANARES, Major (ACC), in his

official capacity; MASSEE, Major

(ACC), in his official capacity; CARL

ZENNON, Warden (ACC), in his

No. 07-1375

(D.C. No. 06-CV-01086-ZLW)

Appellate Case: 07-1375 Document: 010160205 Date Filed: 10/30/2007 Page: 1 
-2-

official capacity, 

 Defendants - Appellees.

ORDER

Filed October 30, 2007

Before HENRY, McCONNELL, and TYMKOVICH, Circuit Judges.

In an October 30, 2006 Order, the district court denied Plaintiff Garcia’s

motion for reconsideration. Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, appeals.

Pro se appellants must comply with the requirements of the Federal Rules of

Appellate Procedure that govern all litigants. See Ogden v. San Juan County, 32

F.3d 452, 455 (10th Cir. 1994). Because no separate judgment pursuant to Fed. R.

Civ. P. 58 was entered by the district court, the time to file a notice of appeal as to

the October 30, 2006 Order did not begin to run until 150 days after entry of this

order, see Rule 58(b)(2)(B), plus an additional 30 days under Fed. R. App. P.

4(a)(1)(A). In this appeal, the 150-day deadline expired on March 29, 2007, and the

30-day deadline expired on Monday, April 30, 2007. See Fed. R. App. P. 26(a)(3).

Plaintiff Garcia filed his notice of appeal as to the October 30, 2006 Order on

September 11, 2007, which was 134 days past the April 30, 2007 filing deadline.

Compliance with filing requirements is “mandatory and jurisdictional.” See Bowles

Appellate Case: 07-1375 Document: 010160205 Date Filed: 10/30/2007 Page: 2 
-3-

v. Russell, 127 S.Ct. 2360, 2363 (2007). Plaintiff’s notice of appeal as to the

October 30, 2006 Order is untimely.

This appeal is DISMISSED for lack of appellate jurisdiction. 

Entered for the Court,

Elisabeth A. Shumaker, Clerk

Kathleen T. Clifford

Attorney - Deputy Clerk

Appellate Case: 07-1375 Document: 010160205 Date Filed: 10/30/2007 Page: 3