Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_09-cv-01942/USCOURTS-caed-1_09-cv-01942-2/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Aurora Loan Services, LLC
Defendant
Chicago Title Company
Defendant
Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems
Defendant
Rachel C. Pacray
Plaintiff
Shea Mortgage, Inc.
Defendant

Document Text:

-1-

Judgment of Dismissal With Prejudice

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

FRESNO DIVISION

RACHEL C. PACRAY, an individual, 

Plaintiff,

v.

SHEA MORTGAGE INC., a Business Entity, 

form unknown; AURORA LOAN SERVICES, 

LLC, a Business Entity, form unknown; 

CHICAGO TITLE COMPANY, a Business 

Entity, form unknown; MORTGAGE 

ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, a 

Business Entity, and DOES 1 through 50, 

inclusive, 

Defendants.

CASE NO. 1:09-cv-01942-OWW-GSA

JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL WITH 

PREJUDICE

On April 23, 2010, the Court granted the Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s First Amended 

Complaint filed by defendants Aurora Loan Services, LLC, and Mortgage Electronic Registration 

Systems. In footnote 2 of the Memroandum Decision and Order granting the Motion to Dismiss, the 

Court held that its ruling applies to the claims asserted against defendant Shea Mortgage, Inc., as well. 

The Court gave Plaintiff fifteen (15) days to file a second amended complaint to cure the defects in the 

prior pleadings. Plaintiff has failed to do so. In ruling on the Motion to Dismiss, the Court 

Case 1:09-cv-01942-OWW -GSA Document 36 Filed 05/27/10 Page 1 of 2
-2-

Judgment of Dismissal With Prejudice

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

specifically instructed Plaintiff that if she failed to file a timely amended complaint the case would be 

dismissed.

As Plaintiff has failed to amend the complaint within the time allowed by the Court, and for the

reasons explained in the Court’s Memorandum Decision and Order [document no. 31], the Court 

hereby DISMISSES all claims against Shea Mortgage Inc. WITH PREJUDICE.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 26, 2010 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE DEAC_Signature-END:

emm0d64h

Case 1:09-cv-01942-OWW -GSA Document 36 Filed 05/27/10 Page 2 of 2