Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-08-06819/USCOURTS-ca4-08-06819-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Inocente Antunez Jimenez
Appellant
United States of America
Appellee

Document Text:

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-6819

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

INOCENTE ANTUNEZ JIMENEZ,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of North Carolina, at Greenville. Malcolm J. Howard,

District Judge. (4:01-cr-00031-H-2)

Submitted: September 16, 2008 Decided: September 23, 2008

Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Inocente Antunez Jimenez, Appellant Pro Se. Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr.,

Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 08-6819 Doc: 9 Filed: 09/23/2008 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Inocente Antunez Jimenez appeals the district court’s

order denying his motion for a reduction in sentence under 18

U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2000) and its order denying his motion for

reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by

the district court. United States v. Jimenez, No. 4:01-cr-00031-H2 (E.D.N.C. Apr. 28, 2008 & May 21, 2008). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Appeal: 08-6819 Doc: 9 Filed: 09/23/2008 Pg: 2 of 2