Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_16-cr-00169/USCOURTS-caed-2_16-cr-00169-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Rafael Camacho Reyes
Defendant
USA
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Dina L. Santos, SBN 204200

A Professional Law Corporation

428 J Street, Suite 359

Sacramento, CA 95814

Telephone: (916) 447-0160

Facsimile: (916) 447-2988

Attorney for:

Rafael Reyes Camacho

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

RAFAEL CAMACHO REYES,

Defendant

CASE NO. 16-0169 MCE

STIPULATION REGARDING EXCLUDABLE 

TIME PERIODS UNDER SPEEDY TRIAL ACT; 

ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE TO 11/17/16 AT 

10:00 A.M.

STIPULATION

Plaintiff United States of America, by and through its counsel of record, AUSA Timothy 

Delgado, represented by Attorney Dina Santos hereby stipulate as follows: 

1. By previous order, this matter was set for status on October 13, 2016. 

2. By this stipulation, defendant now moves to continue the status conference until 

November 17, 2016, and to exclude time between October 13, 2016, and November 17, 2016, under 

Local Code T4. Plaintiff does not oppose this request.

3. The parties agree and stipulate, and request that the Court find the following: 

a) Counsel for defendants desire additional time to finalize a plea agreement, and to 

otherwise prepare for trial. Counsel for defendants believe that failure to grant the aboverequested continuance would deny them the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, 

taking into account the exercise of due diligence.

b) The government does not object to the continuance.

c) Based on the above-stated findings, the ends of justice served by continuing the 

Case 2:16-cr-00169-MCE Document 14 Filed 10/12/16 Page 1 of 3
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

case as requested outweigh the interest of the public and the defendant in a trial within the 

original date prescribed by the Speedy Trial Act. 

d) For the purpose of computing time under the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161, 

et seq., within which trial must commence, the time period of October 13, 2016, to November 

17, 2016, inclusive, is deemed excludable pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 3161(h)(7)(A), B(iv) [Local 

Code T4] because it results from a continuance granted by the Court at defendant’s request on 

the basis of the Court’s finding that the ends of justice served by taking such action outweigh the 

best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

///

///

///

///

///

///

///

///

///

///

///

///

///

///

///

///

///

///

///

///

Case 2:16-cr-00169-MCE Document 14 Filed 10/12/16 Page 2 of 3
3

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

4. Nothing in this stipulation and order shall preclude a finding that other provisions of the 

Speedy Trial Act dictate that additional time periods are excludable from the period within which a trial 

must commence.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Dated: October 11, 2016 Phillip Talbert

United States Attorney

/s/ Timothy Delgado

TIMOTHY DELGADO

Assistant United States Attorney

Dated: October 11, 2016 /s/ Dina L. Santos

DINA L. SANTOS, ESQ.

Attorney for RAFAEL REYES CAMACHO

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 12, 2016

Case 2:16-cr-00169-MCE Document 14 Filed 10/12/16 Page 3 of 3