Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-03295/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-03295-6/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Chase Manhattan Mortgage Corporation
Defendant
Nancy Lendall
Plaintiff

Document Text:

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

NANCY LENDALL, an individual,

Plaintiff,

 v.

CHASE MANHATTAN MORTGAGE

CORPORATION, a New Jersey corporation,

and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive,

Defendants. /

No. C 05-03295 WHA

DISCOVERY ORDER

Pursuant to today’s hearing on several discovery issues in this action, this order rules as

follows:

1. Plaintiff Lendall is ordered to inform defendants of the three Chase Manhattan

loan officers for whom plaintiff most wants contracts and commission statements

by noon, July 20, 2006.

2. Defendants then may submit the contracts for the three chosen loan officers to

the Court under seal for in camera review by noon, July 21, 2006. If the Court

determines that the contracts of three other loan officers are substantially similar

to Lendall’s contract, defendants will be ordered to produce the contracts and

commission statements for the three loan officers. If defendants choose not to

submit the contracts for in camera review, defendants must produce the contracts

Case 3:05-cv-03295-WHA Document 42 Filed 07/19/06 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

and commission statements for the three loan officers to plaintiff by noon,

July 21, 2006.

3. Plaintiff’s requests for answers to interrogatories numbers 3 and 5 are denied as

overbroad.

4. Counsel for plaintiff and defendants must sign a stipulated protective order and

submit it to the Court for approval by noon, July 20, 2006. Until the entry of the

written protective order, the oral protective order read into the record at today’s

hearing remains in place.

5. Within 48 hours, defendants must produce to plaintiff a complete set of Lendall’s

commission statements. Within 48 hours after plaintiff receives the complete set

of commission statements, plaintiff must supplement her responses to

defendants’ interrogatories regarding damages calculations.

5. Plaintiff will take the deposition of Jason Aiello at the offices of plaintiff’s

counsel at 9:30 a.m., assuming plaintiff is able to find and subpoena Aiello.

6. Plaintiff will take the Rule 30(b)(6) deposition of David T. Schilling at a date

and time chosen by defendants’ counsel during the week of July 31, 2006 at the

offices of plaintiff’s counsel, but only as to topics 1 and 2 in plaintiff’s Rule

30(b)(6) notice. The other topics in plaintiff’s Rule 30(b)(6) notice are

overbroad.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 19, 2006 WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:05-cv-03295-WHA Document 42 Filed 07/19/06 Page 2 of 2