Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-01281/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-01281-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Chase Bank
Defendant
Liudmyla Iegorova
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

LIUDMYLA IEGOROVA, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

CHASE BANK, 

Defendant. 

No. 2:15-cv-1281-TLN-EFB PS 

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 

On May 17, 2016, the court dismissed plaintiff’s complaint with leave to amend.1 The 

order explained the complaint’s deficiencies, gave plaintiff thirty days to file an amended 

complaint correcting those deficiencies, and warned plaintiff that failure to file an amended 

complaint would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. ECF No. 3. On June 

22, 2016, the court granted plaintiff an additional thirty days in which to file an amended 

complaint. 

 The deadline has passed and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise 

responded to the order. 

///// 

 1

 This action, in which plaintiff is proceeding in propria persona, was referred to the 

undersigned under Local Rule 302(c)(21). See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). 

Case 2:15-cv-01281-TLN-EFB Document 6 Filed 08/23/16 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2

 Accordingly, it is hereby RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed, and that the 

Clerk be directed to close this case. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); Local Rule 110. 

 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 

after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written 

objections with the court. Such a document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate 

Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Failure to file objections within the specified time 

may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Turner v. Duncan, 158 F.3d 449, 455 

(9th Cir. 1998); Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 

Dated: August 22, 2016. 

Case 2:15-cv-01281-TLN-EFB Document 6 Filed 08/23/16 Page 2 of 2