Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca10-92-05014/USCOURTS-ca10-92-05014-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Lewis Aaron Cook
Appellant
United States of America
Appellee

Document Text:

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

vs. 

LEWIS AARON COOK, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

TENTH CIRCUIT AUG 2 G 1992 

ROBERT L. HOECKER 

> Clerk 

) 

) 

) 

) No. 92-5014 

) (D.C. No. 89-CR-107-E) 

) (N.D. Okla.) 

) 

) 

ORDER AND JUDGMENT* 

Before SEYMOUR, ANDERSON and BALDOCK, Circuit Judges.** 

Defendant Lewis Aaron Cook appeals from the district court's 

order denying his motions for transcripts of two hearings held in 

district court. The district court entered the order on December 

19, 1991, and Defendant filed his notice of appeal on January 3, 

1992. We lack jurisdiction because of the untimely filed notice 

of appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(b); United States v. Lanier, 604 

* This order and judgment has no precedential value and shall 

not be cited, or used by any court within the Tenth Circuit, 

except for purposes of establishing the doctrines of the law of 

the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. 10th Cir. R. 

36.3. 

** After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel 

has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially 

assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 

34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The cause therefore is ordered 

submitted without oral argument. 

Appellate Case: 92-5014 Document: 010110287316 Date Filed: 08/20/1992 Page: 1
F.2d 1157, 1159-60 (8th Cir. 1979). The appeal, therefore, is 

DISMISSED. 

SO ORDERED. 

-2-

Entered for the Court 

Bobby R. Baldock 

Circuit Judge 

Appellate Case: 92-5014 Document: 010110287316 Date Filed: 08/20/1992 Page: 2