Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_10-cv-01179/USCOURTS-azd-2_10-cv-01179-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Michael Borders
Respondent
Michael James Gomez
Petitioner
Kurt Neubauer
Respondent

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Michael James Gomez, 

Petitioner, 

v.

Brigadier General Kurt Neubauer, Major

Michael Borders, 

Respondents. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV-10-01179 PHX-NVW (MEA)

ORDER

Pending before the Court is the Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) of

Magistrate Judge Aspey (Doc. 14) regarding petitioner’s Petition for Writ of Habeas

Corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241(c)(3) (Doc. 1). The R&R recommends that the

Petition be denied and dismissed with prejudice. The Magistrate Judge

advised the parties that they had fourteen days to file objections to the R&R. (R&R at

11). Petitioner filed objections on September 16, 2010 (Doc. 15). Respondents filed a

Reply on September 26, 2010 (Doc. 16). 

The Court has considered the objections and reviewed the Report and

Recommendation de novo. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (stating that

the court must make a de novo determination of those portions of the Report and

Recommendation to which specific objections are made). The decision in Allen v. Steele,

Case 2:10-cv-01179-NVW Document 17 Filed 09/27/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

759 F.2d 1469, 1471 (9th Cir. 1985), is controlling. The Court therefore agrees with the

Magistrate Judge's determinations, accepts the recommended decision within the meaning

of Rule 72(b), Fed. R. Civ. P., and overrules Petitioner's objections. See 28 U.S.C. §

636(b)(1) (stating that the district court “may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in

part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate”).

IT IS ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge

(Doc. 14) is accepted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court enter judgment denying

Petitioner’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241(c)(3)

(Doc. 1) and dismissing it with prejudice. The Clerk shall terminate this action.

DATED this 27th day of September, 2010.

Case 2:10-cv-01179-NVW Document 17 Filed 09/27/10 Page 2 of 2