Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-02301/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-02301-11/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Amtran Technology Co., LTD.
Defendant
Hitachi, Ltd.
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TEMPORARILY CONTINUING STAY OF CASE – No. C 05-2301 CRB (JL) 

Daniel E. Alberti (SBN 68620) (dalberti@mwe.com) 

Stephen J. Akerley (SBN 160757) (sakerley@mwe.com) 

McDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP 

3150 Porter Drive 

Palo Alto, California 94304 

Telephone: (650) 813-5000 

Facsimile: (650) 813-5100 

Joseph H. Paquin, Jr. (Pro Hac Vice) (jpaquin@mwe.com) 

227 West Monroe Street, Suite 4400 

Chicago, Illinois 60606 

Telephone: (312) 372-2000 

Facsimile: (312) 984-7700 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

HITACHI, LTD. 

Edward G. Poplawski (SBN 113590) (epoplawski@sidley.com) 

Peter H. Kang (SBN 158101) (pkang@sidley.com) 

Teague I. Donahey (SBN 197531) (tdonahey@sidley.com) 

Samuel N. Tiu (SBN 216291) (stiu@sidley.com) 

SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP 

555 California Street 

San Francisco, California 94104 

Telephone: (415) 772-1200 

Facsimile: (415) 772-7400 

Attorneys for Defendant 

AMTRAN TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

HITACHI, LTD., 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

AMTRAN TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD., 

Defendant. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Case No. C 05-2301 CRB (JL) 

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER TEMPORARILY CONTINUING 

STAY OF CASE 

Case 3:05-cv-02301-CRB Document 85 Filed 12/19/06 Page 1 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TEMPORARILY CONTINUING STAY OF CASE – No. C 05-2301 CRB (JL) 

 2 

WHEREAS the Court on October 30, 2006 entered an Order staying this action until 

December 15, 2006 to permit the parties to negotiate a Final Agreement resolving their dispute; 

WHEREAS the parties continue to work diligently to negotiate the specific terms and 

conditions of the contemplated Final Agreement; 

WHEREAS the parties need additional time in which to finalize their negotiations 

and arrive at the contemplated Final Agreement; 

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED that, subject to the Court’s approval, this action shall 

continue to be stayed until January 15, 2007, or upon further order of the Court. Subject to the 

Court’s approval and availability, a Further Case Management Conference shall be held on 

February 2, 2007, at 8:30 a.m., or on the Court’s earliest available date thereafter. 

Respectfully submitted, 

McDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP 

By: /s/Stephen J. Akerley1

Dated: December 15, 2006 

Daniel E. Alberti 

Stephen J. Akerley 

Joseph H. Paquin, Jr. (Pro Hac Vice) 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

HITACHI, LTD. 

Dated: December 15, 2006 SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP 

By: /s/Teague I. Donahey 

Edward G. Poplawski 

Peter H. Kang 

Teague I. Donahey 

Samuel N. Tiu 

Attorneys for Defendant 

AMTRAN TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD. 

 

1

 Pursuant to General Order 45(X), the filer of this document hereby attests that concurrence in the filing of the 

document has been obtained from Stephen J. Akerley. 

Case 3:05-cv-02301-CRB Document 85 Filed 12/19/06 Page 2 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TEMPORARILY CONTINUING STAY OF CASE – No. C 05-2301 CRB (JL) 

 3 

 IT IS SO ORDERED 

Dated: _________________________ ________________________________________ 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

SF1 1445748v.1 

December 18, 2006

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Charles R. Breyer

Case 3:05-cv-02301-CRB Document 85 Filed 12/19/06 Page 3 of 3