Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca10-89-04116/USCOURTS-ca10-89-04116-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Bruce E. Camp
Appellant
Hill-Rom Company, Inc.
Appellee

Document Text:

FILED 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT 

United States Court of Appeals 

Tenth Circuit 

AUG 2 8 1990 

BRUCE E. CAMP, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v. 

HILL-ROM COMPANY, INC., an Indiana 

corporation, 

Defendant-Appellee. 

ROBERT L. HOECKER 

) Clerk 

) 

) 

) 

) No. 89-4116 

) (D.C. No. 88-C-475W) 

) (D. Utah) 

) 

) 

) 

ORDER AND JUDGMENT * 

Before SEYMOUR, BRORBY, and EBEL, Circuit Judges. 

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel 

has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially 

assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 

34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. 

submitted without oral argument. 

The case is therefore ordered 

Plaintiff-appellant Bruce E. Camp appeals from an order of 

the district court granting summary judgment in favor of 

defendant-appellee Hill-Rom Company after determining that a 

written employment contract was enforceable and Camp did not prove 

* This order and judgment has no precedential value and shall 

not be cited, or used by any court within the Tenth Circuit, 

except for purposes of establishing the doctrines of the law of 

the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. 10th Cir. R. 

36.3. 

Appellate Case: 89-4116 Document: 010110041621 Date Filed: 08/28/1990 Page: 1 
that any alleged misrepresentations by Hill-Rom caused him damage. 

On appeal, Camp argues (1) the district court erred in ruling that 

there was independent consideration adequate to support the 

written employment contract which modified an earlier oral 

contract and (2) the district court erred in ruling that there 

were no material issues of fact upon which a trier of fact could 

infer that his termination resulted from Hill-Rom's 

misrepresentations. 

Upon consideration of the briefs and record on appeal, we 

conclude the district court correctly granted Hill-Rom's motion 

for summary judgment. Accordingly, the judgment of the United 

States District Court for the District of Utah is AFFIRMED for 

substantially the reasons stated in the order filed July 25, 1989. 

ENTERED FOR THE COURT 

PER CURIAM 

2 

Appellate Case: 89-4116 Document: 010110041621 Date Filed: 08/28/1990 Page: 2