Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-19-07701/USCOURTS-ca4-19-07701-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Robert H. Johnson
Appellant
Pamlico Correctional Institution
Appellee

Document Text:

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-7701

ROBERT H. JOHNSON,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

DEPT. ADULT CORRECTIONS PAMLICO CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at 

Statesville. Frank D. Whitney, Chief District Judge. (5:17-cv-00188-FDW)

Submitted: January 21, 2020 Decided: January 24, 2020

Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Robert H. Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 19-7701 Doc: 6 Filed: 01/24/2020 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Robert H. Johnson seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing without 

prejudice Johnson’s 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2018) petition. We dismiss the appeal for lack of 

jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was not timely filed.

Parties are accorded thirty days after the entry of the district court’s final judgment 

or order to note an appeal, Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court extends the 

appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R. 

App. P. 4(a)(6). “[T]he timely filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional 

requirement.” Bowles v. Russell, 551 U.S. 205, 214 (2007).

The district court’s order was entered on the docket on October 24, 2017. The notice 

of appeal was filed on November 5, 2019.

*

 Because Johnson failed to file a timely notice 

of appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we dismiss the appeal. 

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

DISMISSED

 * For the purpose of this appeal, we assume that the date appearing on the notice of 

appeal is the earliest date it could have been properly delivered to prison officials for 

mailing to the court. Fed. R. App. P. 4(c); Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266 (1988).

USCA4 Appeal: 19-7701 Doc: 6 Filed: 01/24/2020 Pg: 2 of 2