Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-00959/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-00959-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Stephanie A. Harrison
Plaintiff
Shasta County Government Policies
Defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

STEPHANIE A. HARRISON,

Plaintiff, No. CIV-S-06-0959 DFL EFB PS

vs.

SHASTA COUNTY GOVERNMENT

POLICIES,

Defendant. ORDER

__________________________________/

On January 9, 2007, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein

which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and

recommendations were to be filed within ten days. No objections were filed.

 Accordingly, the court presumes any findings of fact are correct. See Orland v.

United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1999). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are

reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983).

The court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and, good cause appearing,

concludes that it is appropriate to adopt the proposed Findings and Recommendations in full.

 Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that:

1. The proposed Findings and Recommendations filed January 9, 2007, are

ADOPTED; and

Case 2:06-cv-00959-RRB-EFB Document 7 Filed 07/17/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

2. This action is dismissed without prejudice.

ENTERED this 16th day of July, 2007.

S/RALPH R. BEISTLINE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00959-RRB-EFB Document 7 Filed 07/17/07 Page 2 of 2