Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-01316/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-01316-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
American Medical Response, Inc.
Counter Defendant
City of Stockton
Counter Claimant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

016.366038.1 STIPULATION AND ORDER RE EXPEDITED DISCOVERY 

WULFSBERG REESE COLVIG & FIRSTMAN 

PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION 

300 LAKESIDE DRIVE, 24TH FLOOR 

OAKLAND, CA 94612-3524 

TELEPHONE: 510.835.9100 

FACSIMILE: 510.451.2170 

CHARLES W. REESE, BAR NO. 045805 

TIMOTHY A. COLVIG, BAR NO. 114723 

MICHAEL J. HIGGINS, BAR NO. 151549 

ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT AND COUNTERCLAIMANT, CITY 

OF STOCKTON

FOLEY & LARDNER LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW 

ONE MARITIME PLAZA, SIXTH FLOOR 

SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-3409 

TELEPHONE: 415.434.4484 

FACSIMILE: 415.434.4507 

MICHAEL E. DELEHUNT, BAR NO. 070619 

MICHAEL A. NARANJO, BAR NO. 221449 

SEAN P. WELCH, BAR NO. 227101 

ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF AND COUNTERDEFENDANT,

AMERICAN MEDICALRESPONSE, INC., A DELAWARE 

CORPORATION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

AMERICAN MEDICAL RESPONSE, INC., 

A DELAWARE CORPORATION

 PLAINTIFF, 

v. 

CITY OF STOCKTON, A CALIFORNIA 

MUNICIPAL CORPORATION; DOES 1 

THROUGH 50, 

 DEFENDANTS. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

CASE NO. 2:05-CV-01316-DFL-PAN 

STIPULATION AND ORDER RE 

EXPEDITED DISCOVERY 

CITY OF STOCKTON, A CALIFORNIA 

MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, 

 COUNTERCLAIMANT, 

v. 

AMERICAN MEDICAL RESPONSE, INC., 

A DELAWARE CORPORATION, 

 COUNTERDEFENDANT. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Case 2:05-cv-01316-JAM-EFB Document 15 Filed 07/27/05 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2 

016.366038.1 STIPULATION AND ORDER RE EXPEDITED DISCOVERY 

Plaintiff and counterdefendant American Medical Response, Inc. (“AMR”) and defendant 

and counterclaimant City of Stockton (collectively, the “parties”) hereby stipulate to expedited 

discovery in preparation for a hearing on the motion for preliminary injunction the City of 

Stockton intends to notice for hearing on September 14, 2005 and in preparation for a hearing on 

the motion for summary judgment AMR intends to notice for hearing on September 14, 2005. In 

particular, the parties stipulate to lift the stays on discovery and motions under Federal Rules of 

Civil Procedure 16, 26, and 56, so that the parties can have the City of Stockton’s motion for 

preliminary injunction and AMR’s motion for summary judgment heard on September 14, 2005, 

and so that they each can take the following expedited discovery on or before August 15, 2005: 

i Up to seven (7) depositions, of which: 

o Not more than five can be 4-hour depositions of party witnesses; and 

o Not more than three can be 3-hour depositions of third party witnesses; 

i Up to 15 requests for production of documents to each party, with 10-day 

response time. 

Case 2:05-cv-01316-JAM-EFB Document 15 Filed 07/27/05 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3 

016.366038.1 STIPULATION AND ORDER RE EXPEDITED DISCOVERY 

The limited depositions will be without prejudice to completion after the hearings 

described above. Likewise, the limited requests for production will be without prejudice to 

additional written discovery after the hearings described above. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED 

DATED: JULY ___, 2005 WULFSBERG REESE COLVIG &

FIRSTMAN

PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION

______________________________________

CHARLES W. REESE

ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT AND 

COUNTERCLAIMANT, CITY OF

STOCKTON 

DATED: JULY ___, 2005 FOLEY & LARDNER LLP 

______________________________________

MICHAEL E. DELEHUNT

ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF AND 

COUNTERDEFENDANT, AMERICAN 

MEDICAL RESPONSE, INC. 

IT IS SO ORDERED 

DATED: JULY _26, 2005 

/s/ David F. Levi 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF 

CALIFORNIA 

Case 2:05-cv-01316-JAM-EFB Document 15 Filed 07/27/05 Page 3 of 3