Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_21-cv-01956/USCOURTS-caed-2_21-cv-01956-3/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Bonneville International Corporation
Defendant
Grant Napear
Plaintiff

Document Text:

JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER 

REGARDING STAY OF DEPOSOTION 

DISCOVERY

-1- 2:21-cv-01956-KJM-DB

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GRANT NAPEAR,

Plaintiff, 

v. 

BONNEVILLE INTERNATIONAL 

CORPORATION, a Utah corporation; and 

DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, 

Defendants. 

Case No. 2:21-cv-01956-KJM-DB

JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER 

REGARDING STAY OF DEPOSITION 

DISCOVERY

District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller

Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes

Complaint Filed: October 21, 2021 

David J. Jordan (UT #1751, admitted pro hac vice) 

 Email: djordan@foley.com

Tanner B. Camp (CA # 321716) 

 Email: tcamp@foley.com

FOLEY & LARDNER LLP

299 S. Main Street, Suite 2000 

Salt Lake City, UT 84111 

Telephone: (801) 401-8900 

Fax: (385) 799-7576 

Attorneys for Defendant Bonneville 

International Corporation 

Case 2:21-cv-01956-DAD-SCR Document 32 Filed 04/26/22 Page 1 of 3
JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER 

REGARDING STAY OF DEPOSOTION 

DISCOVERY

-2- 2:21-cv-01956-KJM-DB

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

JOINT STIPULATION

Pursuant to Local Rule 143, Plaintiff Grant Napear and Defendant Bonneville 

International Corporation (“Bonneville”), by and through their respective counsel, hereby 

stipulate as follows: 

WHEREAS, on April 6, 2022, the Court reset the Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference 

in this matter for July 28, 2022 (ECF No. 29), in light of Bonneville’s pending Motion to Dismiss 

First Amended Complaint (“Motion to Dismiss”) (ECF No. 13); 

WHEREAS, on April 15, 2022, counsel for Bonneville and counsel for Mr. Napear met 

and conferred regarding a proposed stay of deposition discovery pending the Court’s decision on 

the Motion to Dismiss; 

WHEREAS, Mr. Napear has noticed depositions of certain party and third-party 

witnesses; 

THEREFORE, THE PARTIES HEREBY STIPULATE AS FOLLOWS:

1. The depositions of John Rinehart, Steve Cottingim, and Matina Kolokotronis—

noticed by Mr. Napear for April 25, May 2, and May 10 respectively— will go forward as 

noticed; 

2. All other party and third-party depositions will be stayed pending the Court’s

ruling on the Motion to Dismiss; 

3. Deposition discovery will automatically reopen upon the Court’s ruling on the

Motion to Dismiss if the motion is not granted in its entirety; 

4. The deposition of Darrell Brown will be preliminarily scheduled for August 11,

2022, and will go forward on that date if the Court has ruled on the Motion to Dismiss by that 

time. 

Case 2:21-cv-01956-DAD-SCR Document 32 Filed 04/26/22 Page 2 of 3
JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER 

REGARDING STAY OF DEPOSOTION 

DISCOVERY

-3- 2:21-cv-01956-KJM-DB

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

DATED: April 20, 2022. FOLEY & LARDNER LLP

/s/ Tanner B. Camp 

David J. Jordan

Tanner B. Camp

Attorneys for Defendant Bonneville International 

Corporation

DATED: April 20, 2022. RUGGLES LAW FIRM

/s/ Matthew J. Ruggles (as authorized on 4/20/2022) 

Matthew J. Ruggles

Attorneys Plaintiff Grant Napear

 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: April 26, 2022. 

Case 2:21-cv-01956-DAD-SCR Document 32 Filed 04/26/22 Page 3 of 3