Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00546/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00546-4/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
California Attorney General
Respondent
Kenneth Dowe Smith
Petitioner

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KENNETH DOWE SMITH, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

)

v. )

)

)

CALIFORNIA ATTORNEY GENERAL, )

)

Respondent. )

 )

1:05-cv-00546-OWW-TAG HC 

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND

RECOMMENDATION

(Doc. 10)

ORDER DISMISSING AMENDED PETITION

FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

(Doc. 6)

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO

ENTER JUDGMENT

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. 

On July 19, 2006, the Magistrate Judge assigned to the case filed a Report and

Recommendation recommending that the petition for writ of habeas corpus be DISMISSED for

failure to prosecute. (Doc. 17). The Report and Recommendation was served on all parties and

contained notice that any objections were to be filed within thirty days from the date of service of

that order. To date, no party has filed objections, and Petitioner's mail has been returned to the Court

marked "undeliverable." (Doc. 18). 

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a de

novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court concludes that the

Case 1:05-cv-00546-OWW -TAG Document 19 Filed 10/17/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation is supported by the record and proper analysis. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Report and Recommendation issued July 19, 2006 (Doc. 17), is ADOPTED IN FULL; 

2. The amended petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. 6) is DISMISSED without prejudice;

and,

3. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to ENTER JUDGMENT for Respondent and close the

file.

This order terminates the action in its entirety.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 12, 2006 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger 

emm0d6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:05-cv-00546-OWW -TAG Document 19 Filed 10/17/06 Page 2 of 2