Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_16-cv-01682/USCOURTS-caed-2_16-cv-01682-2/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Evan Alder
Plaintiff
County of Yolo
Defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

JOINT STIPUATION AND PROPOSED ORDER CASE NO. 2:16-cv-01682-VC

Gary Messing, Bar No. 075363

 gary@majlabor.com 

Jason H. Jasmine, Bar No. 215757

 jason@majlabor.com

MESSING ADAM & JASMINE LLP

Attorneys at Law

980 9th Street, Suite 380

Sacramento, California 95814

Telephone: 916.446.5297

Facsimile: 916.448.5047

Attorneys for Plaintiff

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

EVAN ALDER, on behalf of himself and

all similarly situated individuals,

Plaintiff,

v.

COUNTY OF YOLO,

Defendant.

Case No. 2:16-cv-01682-VC

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER CONTINUING CASE 

MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 

Complaint Filed: July 20, 2016

Case Management 

Conference Date: November 15, 2016

STIPULATION

These stipulations are entered into by and between Plaintiff EVAN ALDER, on behalf of 

himself and all similarly situated individuals (“the Plaintiffs”) and the County of Yolo (“County”), 

collectively, (“the Parties”), with respect to allegations and claims in the above-named Complaint, 

“the Alder Complaint.” The Parties are currently engaged in settlement negotiations as to one 

portion of the Complaint and are currently in discussions regarding case management.

According to the timelines currently set forth in this action, the Parties must file a Case 

Management Statement with the Court by November 8, 2016, and appear at the Initial Case 

Management Conference on November 15, 2016. The County was served with the Complaint on 

Case 2:16-cv-01682-VC Document 13 Filed 11/10/16 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-2-

JOINT STIPUATION AND PROPOSED ORDER CASE NO. 2:16-cv-01682-VC

October 19, 2016. Furthermore, the Parties have just entered into a Joint Stipulation to allow the 

County a two-week continuance for responding to the Complaint.

WHEREAS, the Parties have reached this Stipulation in order to: (1) conserve resources; 

and (2) address the costs, time, and risks of continued litigation; and (3) to continue engaging in 

settlement discussions prior to the case management conference.

IT IS THEREFORE STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the Parties to the 

above-referenced action, through their respective attorneys of record, that the following be 

adopted as the findings and Order of this Court:

1. With the permission of the Court, the Parties agree that the initial Case 

Management Conference be scheduled for December 20, 2016.

2. With the permission of the Court, the Parties agree that the Case Management 

Statement be filed with the Court on or before December 13, 2016.

IT IS SO STIPULATED AND AGREED.

Dated: November 8, 2016 PHILIP J. POGLEDICH

 COUNTY COUNSEL

 By: /s/ Ronald J. Martinez

 RONALD J. MARTINEZ

 DEPUTY COUNTY COUNSEL 

 Attorney for Defendant

Dated: November 8, 2016 MESSING ADAM & JASMINE LLP

 By: /s/ Gary M. Messing

 GARY M. MESSING 

 Attorney for Plaintiff

/ / /

/ / /

/ / /

Case 2:16-cv-01682-VC Document 13 Filed 11/10/16 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-3-

JOINT STIPUATION AND PROPOSED ORDER CASE NO. 2:16-cv-01682-VC

ORDER

Based on the Joint Stipulation of the Parties, and good cause appearing therefore, 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED that the Parties file a Case 

Management Conference with the Court on or before December 13, 2016, and that the Initial Case 

Management Conference be set for December 20, 2016.

Dated: ________________ ______________________________

 VINCE CHHABRIA

 United States District Judge

November 9, 2016

Case 2:16-cv-01682-VC Document 13 Filed 11/10/16 Page 3 of 3