Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cr-00687/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cr-00687-6/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Bruce Barker
Defendant
USA
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[PROP.] ORDER

CR 06 0687 SI 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

BRUCE BARKER,

Defendant.

 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CR 06 0687 SI

[PROPOSED] ORDER FINDING

EXCLUDABLE TIME

UNDER SPEEDY TRIAL ACT

18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(A)&(B)(iv)

The parties appeared before the Court on May 11, 2007. Assistant United States

Attorney Susan Badger appeared on behalf of the government. Lidia Stiglich appeared on

behalf of the defendant, who was present and out of custody. 

The parties advised the Court that counsel for the government has been involved in

the trial in the case of United States v. Quan, CR 04 0323 WBS from January 16, 2007 to

May 4, 2007. That has made it difficult for the parties to have any substantive

discussions regarding possible resolution of the case. In the interim, the government has

Case 3:06-cr-00687-SI Document 25 Filed 05/14/2007 Page 1 of 2
 Case 3:06-cr-00687-SI Document 26 Filed 05/14/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[PROP.] ORDER

CR 06 0687 SI 2

provided all discovery to the defendant for review. The parties jointly requested that the

matter be continued to June 22, 2007 at 11:00 a.m. in order to provide reasonable time,

taking into account due diligence, to engage in further investigation, further review of

discovery, and discussions relating to a resolution of the matter. Ms. Stiglitz advised that

she will be unavailable for three of the weeks between May 11 and June 22. AUSA

Badger advised that she will be unavailable for one additional week. The parties

additionally requested that the time from May 11, 2007 through June 22, 2007 be

excluded from the requirements of the Speedy Trial Act in order to provide reasonable

time for preparation of counsel, taking into account due diligence, and in light of the

unavailability of both counsel during part of that time. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(A) &

(B)(iv). The defendant stated that he concurred in the requests to continue the matter and

for a finding of excludable time. 

Upon the motion of the parties and for good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY

ORDERED that the matter is continued to June 22, 2007 at 11:00 a.m. for status

regarding resolution of the case or for trial setting. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the

time from May 11, 2007 through June 22, 2007 is excluded from the time requirements of

the Speedy Trial Act in order to provide the parties continuity of counsel and in order to

provide the parties reasonable time for effective preparation taking into account due

diligence. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(A) & (B)(iv).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

 

SUSAN ILLSTON

United States District Judge

Case 3:06-cr-00687-SI Document 25 Filed 05/14/2007 Page 2 of 2
 Case 3:06-cr-00687-SI Document 26 Filed 05/14/07 Page 2 of 2