Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-00798/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-00798-4/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Baltimore Aircoil Company
Defendant
Cincinnati Incorporated
Defendant
Alex Galindo
Plaintiff
Irene Galindo
Plaintiff
The Cincinnati Shaper Company
Defendant

Document Text:

STEPHEN H. DYE (State Bar No. 104385)

T. SCOTT TATE (State Bar No. 118427)

MARGARET L. SELL (State Bar No. 184088)

SCHNADER HARRISON SEGAL & LEWIS LLP

One Montgomery Street, Suite 2200

San Francisco, CA 94104-5501

Telephone: (415) 364-6700

Fax: (415) 364-6785

Attorneys for Defendant CINCINNATI INCORPORATED 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – FRESNO DIVISION 

ALEX GALINDO and IRENE GALINDO,

Plaintiffs,

vs.

BALTIMORE AIRCOIL COMPANY, as

corporation; CINCINNATI INCORPORATED,

doing business in California as “The Cincinnati

Shaper Company,” a corporation; and DOES 1

through 100, 

Defendants.

Case No.: 07-CV-00798-LJO-GSA 

STIPULATION AND ORDER 

RE DISMISSAL OF CINCINNATI

INCORPORATED 

Trial Date: April 20, 2009 8:30 a.m. 

The plaintiffs and defendants, by and through their attorneys of record, hereby stipulate

and agree to the following: 

1. Plaintiffs Alex Galindo and Irene Galindo dismiss with prejudice Cincinnati

Incorporated from the Complaint currently on file in the above-referenced court with each party

to bear their own attorney fees and costs. 

2. All parties agree that plaintiffs’ dismissal of defendant Cincinnati Incorporated is

the result of a settlement between plaintiffs and defendant Cincinnati Incorporated that was and

is made in good faith and in accordance with the provisions of California Code of Civil

Procedure §§877 and 877.6.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Dated: February ____, 2008.

Case 1:07-cv-00798-LJO-GSA Document 28 Filed 02/28/08 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-2-

STIPULATION AND ORDER RE DISMISSAL OF CINCINNATI INCORPORATED 

Alex Galindo et al. v. Baltimore Aircoil Company, et al. USDC-ED-FD- C:07-CIV-00798-LJO-GSA

PHDATA 3061773_1

CORNWELL & SAMPLE LLP 

/s/

By

STEPHEN R. CORNWELL

Attorneys for Plaintiffs Alex Galindo and Irene Galindo 

Dated: February ____, 2008.

SCHNADER HARRISON SEGAL & LEWIS LLP

/s/

By

T. SCOTT TATE

MARGARET L. SELL

Attorneys for Defendant CINCINNATI INCORPORATED

Dated: February ____, 2008.

GALLAWA BROWN KROESCH 

/s/

By

DOUGLAS A. KROESCH

Attorneys for Defendant BALTIMORE AIRCOIL

COMPANY

Case 1:07-cv-00798-LJO-GSA Document 28 Filed 02/28/08 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-3-

STIPULATION AND ORDER RE DISMISSAL OF CINCINNATI INCORPORATED 

Alex Galindo et al. v. Baltimore Aircoil Company, et al. USDC-ED-FD- C:07-CIV-00798-LJO-GSA

PHDATA 3061773_1

ORDER

IT APPEARING TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE COURT THAT the parties have

entered into a Stipulation For The Dismissal of Cincinnati Incorporated. 

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that:

1. 

Defendant Cincinnati Incorporated is hereby dismissed with prejudice from the complaint

currently on file in the above-referenced matter, with each party to bear its own attorney fees and

costs; and

2. The dismissal of defendant Cincinnati Incorporated from this matter is the result

of a settlement between plaintiffs Alex and Irene Galindo, and defendant Cincinnati

Incorporated, that was and is made in good faith and in accordance with the provisions of

California Code of Civil Procedure §§877 and 877.6.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 28, 2008 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill 

66h44d UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:07-cv-00798-LJO-GSA Document 28 Filed 02/28/08 Page 3 of 3