Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-02301/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-02301-9/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Amtran Technology Co., LTD.
Defendant
Hitachi, Ltd.
Plaintiff

Document Text:

M CDERMOTT 

WILL 

& EMERY LLP

ATTORNEYS AT LA W

PALO ALTO

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[PROPOSED] STIPULATED ORDER 

REGARDING CLAIM CONSTRUCTION 

SCHEDULE

1 CASE NO. C 05 02301 CRB

McDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP

Daniel E. Alberti (State Bar No. 68620) dalberti@mwe.com

Stephen J. Akerley (State Bar No. 160757) sakerley@mwe.com

3150 Porter Drive

Palo Alto, CA 94304-1212

Telephone: 650.813.5000

Facsimile: 650.813.5100

McDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP

Joseph H. Paquin, Jr. (Pro Hac Vice) jpaquin@mwe.com

227 West Monroe Street, Suite 4400

Chicago, IL 60606-5096

Telephone: 312.372.2000

Facsimile: 312.984.7700

Attorneys for Plaintiff HITACHI, LTD.

SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP

Peter H. Kang (SBN 158101) pkang@sidley.com

555 California Street

San Francisco, CA 94104

Telephone: 415.772.1200

Facsimile: 415.772.7400

Attorneys for Defendant AMTRAN TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

HITACHI, LTD., a Japanese corporation,

Plaintiff,

v.

AMTRAN TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD., a 

Taiwanese corporation,

Defendant.

CASE NO. C 05 02301 CRB (JL)

ELECTRONIC CASE FILING

[PROPOSED] STIPULATED ORDER 

REGARDING CLAIM CONSTRUCTION 

SCHEDULE

Whereas, the parties are engaged in advanced settlement discussions and wish to 

concentrate their efforts toward reaching a final resolution,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:

The Claim Construction schedule in this case is modified as follows:

Case 3:05-cv-02301-CRB Document 81 Filed 09/06/06 Page 1 of 3
M CDERMOTT 

WILL 

& EMERY LLP

ATTORNEYS AT LA W

PALO ALTO

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[PROPOSED] STIPULATED ORDER 

REGARDING CLAIM CONSTRUCTION 

SCHEDULE

2 CASE NO. C 05 02301 CRB

ACTION CURRENT DATE PROPOSED NEW 

DATE

The party claiming patent infringement 

shall file and serve an opening brief and 

any evidence supporting its claim 

construction

August 31, 2006 October 30, 2006

The opposing party shall file and serve a 

responsive brief and supporting evidence

September 14, 2006 November 13, 2006

The party claiming patent infringement 

shall serve and file any reply brief and 

any evidence

September 21, 2006 November 20, 2006

Claim Construction Tutorial November 14, 2006

2:30 p.m.

To be determined by the 

Court

Claim Construction Hearing November 16, 2006

2:30 p.m.

To be determined by the 

Court

Dated: August 30, 2006 Respectfully submitted,

McDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP

By: /s/ Daniel E. Alberti

Daniel E. Alberti

Stephen J. Akerley

Joseph H. Paquin, Jr. (Pro Hac Vice)

Attorneys for Plaintiff, HITACHI, LTD., 

a Japanese corporation

Dated: August 30, 2006 Respectfully submitted,

SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP

By: /s/ Peter H. Kang

Peter H. Kang

Attorneys for Defendant AMTRAN 

TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD., a Taiwanese 

corporation

MPK 114232-1.017575.0688

January 16, 2007 (CRB) Jaunaury 25, 2007 (CRB)

Case 3:05-cv-02301-CRB Document 81 Filed 09/06/06 Page 2 of 3
M CDERMOTT 

WILL 

& EMERY LLP

ATTORNEYS AT LA W

PALO ALTO

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[PROPOSED] STIPULATED ORDER 

REGARDING CLAIM CONSTRUCTION 

SCHEDULE

1 CASE NO. C 05 02301 CRB

IT IS SO ORDERED

Dated:

Honorable Charles R. Breyer

September 6, 2006

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Charles R. Breyer

Case 3:05-cv-02301-CRB Document 81 Filed 09/06/06 Page 3 of 3