Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca10-91-03265/USCOURTS-ca10-91-03265-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Phillip A. Peavy
Appellant
Shoney's Incorporated
Appellee
Raymond A. Smith
Appellee

Document Text:

FI L ~ D 

United States Court of Ap~b UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS T"•·t~ r,;,.. ... ,,:• 

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT 

PHILLIP A. PEAVY, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v. 

SHONEY'S INCORPORATED, and RAYMOND A. 

SMITH, 

Defendants-Appellees. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

ORDER AND JUDGMENT* 

MARO 51992 

ROBERT L. HOECKER 

Clerk 

No. 91-3265 

(D.C. No. 89-2284) 

( D. Kan.) 

Before SEYMOUR and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges, and SAM,** District 

Judge. 

**Honorable David Sam, District Judge, United States District 

Court for the District of Utah, sitting by designation. 

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel 

has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially 

assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 

34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. 

submitted without oral argument. 

* 

The case is therefore ordered 

This order and judgment has no precedential value and shall 

not be cited, or used by any court wi thi n the Tenth Circuit, 

except for purposes of establishing the doctri nes of the law of 

the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. 10th Ci r. R. 

36.3. 

Appellate Case: 91-3265 Document: 010110226727 Date Filed: 03/05/1992 Page: 1 
Plaintiff-appellant Phillip A. Peavy appeals from the 

district court's denial of his Motion To Set Aside Journal Entry. 

That order was entered on the district court docket on June 10, 

1991. Mr. Peavy's Notice of Appeal was filed on August 12, 1991. 

Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(l) requires that notices of appeal in civil 

cases be filed within thirty days after entry of the order or 

judgment being appealed. Compliance with this rule is "mandatory 

and jurisdictional." Browder v. Director, Dep't of Corrections, 

434 U. S. 257, 264 (1978). Mr. Peavy's notice was filed some 

sixty-three days after the district court entered its order. As a 

consequence, it is untimely, and this appeal must be dismissed. 

Accordingly, Appellant's Motion To Include Exhibits In 

Addendum, Motion To Certify Questions of State Law, and Motion to 

Take Judicial Notice of Proceeding are DENIED. Appellee's Motion 

to Dismiss Appeal is GRANTED. 

Entered for the Court 

David Sam 

District Judge 

2 

Appellate Case: 91-3265 Document: 010110226727 Date Filed: 03/05/1992 Page: 2