Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_19-cv-00210/USCOURTS-caed-1_19-cv-00210-3/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
N. Cruz
Defendant
Hodge
Defendant
R.T. Mora
Defendant
B. Phelps
Defendant
Georgette G. Purnell
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GEORGETTE G. PURNELL,

Plaintiff,

v.

R.T. MORA, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 1:19-cv-00210-DAD-BAM

ORDER DISREGARDING MARCH 4, 2020 

FILING

(Doc. No. 11)

Plaintiff Georgette G. Purnell (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed 

this action against Fresno County Police Officers R.T. Mora, Hodge, N. Cruz, and B. Phelps 

(“Defendants”), alleging violation of her civil rights under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (Doc. Nos. 1, 5-6.) 

On January 10, 2020, the Court issued a screening order granting Plaintiff leave to file an 

amended complaint within thirty (30) days. (Doc. No. 7.) 

On February 28, 2020, Plaintiff filed her First Amended Complaint. (Doc. No. 10.) 

Plaintiff also filed a document entitled “Notice of Late Receipt of Court Order Granting Plaintiff 

Leave to File Amended Complaint” on February 28, 2020, explaining that she had received the 

Court’s January 10, 2020 screening order late and filed her amended complaint as soon as she 

could. (Doc. No. 11.) On March 4, 2020, Plaintiff again filed a document entitled “Notice of Late 

Receipt of Court Order Granting Plaintiff Leave to File Amended Complaint,” which was 

docketed as a motion for an extension of time. (Doc. No. 11.) 

The document filed on March 4, 2020, is identical to and duplicative of the document filed 

on February 28, 2020. Furthermore, as Plaintiff has filed her First Amended Complaint, an 

Case 1:19-cv-00210-DAD-BAM Document 12 Filed 03/10/20 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

extension of time is unnecessary. Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint will be screened in due 

course.

Accordingly, the Court HEREBY DISREGARDS Plaintiff’s March 4, 2020 “Notice of 

Late Receipt of Court Order Granting Plaintiff Leave to File Amended Complaint” (Doc. No. 11).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 10, 2020 /s/ Barbara A. McAuliffe _

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:19-cv-00210-DAD-BAM Document 12 Filed 03/10/20 Page 2 of 2