Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-14-07779/USCOURTS-ca4-14-07779-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Lieutenant Banty
Appellee
Deputy Cherry
Appellee
Dorel Pickett
Appellant
M. Rawls
Appellee

Document Text:

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-7779

DOREL PICKETT,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

DEPUTY M. RAWLS, 71 Sussex S. D.; LIEUTENANT BANTY, Sussex 

Lieutenant; DEPUTY CHERRY, Sussex Deputy,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Arenda L. Wright Allen, 

District Judge. (2:14-cv-00278-AWA-DEM)

Submitted: April 23, 2015 Decided: April 27, 2015

Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Dorel Pickett, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 14-7779 Doc: 8 Filed: 04/27/2015 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Dorel Pickett appeals the district court’s order denying 

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have 

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, 

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Pickett 

v. Rawls, No. 2:14-cv-00278-AWA-DEM (E.D. Va. Nov. 10, 2014). 

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Appeal: 14-7779 Doc: 8 Filed: 04/27/2015 Pg: 2 of 2