Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-00605/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-00605-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Alameda County Sheriff's Dept.
Defendant
Wilson Douglas Buckley
Plaintiff

Document Text:

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

WILSON DOUGLAS BUCKLEY,

Plaintiff,

v.

ALAMEDA COUNTY 

SHERIFF'S DEPT.,

Defendant. /

No. C 07-605 SI (pr)

ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

On May 11, 2007, mail was sent to plaintiff at the address he provided to the court and

was returned undelivered on May 30, 2007 and stamped "not in custody." Plaintiff has not

provided any address other than the one to which the undeliverable mail was sent. More than

sixty days have passed since the envelope containing the May 11, 2007 order of the chief judge

was returned to the court undelivered. 

Plaintiff has failed to comply with Local Rule 3-11(a) which requires that a party

proceeding pro se must "promptly file with the Court and serve upon all opposing parties a

Notice of Change of Address specifying the new address" when his address changes. Local Rule

3-11(b) allows the court to dismiss a complaint without prejudice when mail directed to a pro

se party is returned as not deliverable and the pro se party fails to send a current address within

sixty days of the return of the undelivered mail For the foregoing reasons, this action is

dismissed without prejudice because plaintiff failed to keep the court informed of his address

in compliance with Local Rule 3-11(a).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated:8/1/07 _______________ _______________________

 SUSAN ILLSTON

United States District Judge

Case 3:07-cv-00605-SI Document 7 Filed 08/01/07 Page 1 of 1