Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-15-02149/USCOURTS-ca4-15-02149-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
R. Jeffries Broxton

Carolyn W. Colvin
Appellee
Audrey Deloris Ross
Appellant
Daniel Hubert Ross
Appellant
Social Security Administration

Document Text:

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-2149

DANIEL HUBERT ROSS; AUDREY DELORIS ROSS,

Plaintiffs - Appellants,

v.

CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security 

Administration in their individual person and official 

capacity,

Defendant – Appellee,

and

R. JEFFRIES BROXTON, Field Office Manager in their 

individual person and official capacity; SOCIAL SECURITY 

ADMINISTRATION, their successors or persons Acting at their 

behest,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, Senior District 

Judge. (8:14-cv-02967-DKC)

Submitted: February 23, 2016 Decided: February 25, 2016

Before MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Appeal: 15-2149 Doc: 14 Filed: 02/25/2016 Pg: 1 of 3
2

Daniel Hubert Ross, Audrey Deloris Ross, Appellants Pro Se. 

Matthew Paul Phelps, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, 

Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 15-2149 Doc: 14 Filed: 02/25/2016 Pg: 2 of 3
3

PER CURIAM:

Daniel Hubert Ross and Audrey Deloris Ross appeal the 

district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the 

magistrate judge and dismissing their civil action. We have 

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, 

we grant the motions to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm for 

the reasons stated by the district court. Ross v. Colvin, No. 

8:14-cv-02967-DKC (D. Md. Aug. 27, 2015). We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before this court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Appeal: 15-2149 Doc: 14 Filed: 02/25/2016 Pg: 3 of 3