Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca8-15-03248/USCOURTS-ca8-15-03248-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Juan Martinez Leanos
Appellant
United States of America
Appellee

Document Text:

United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 15-3248

___________________________

United States of America

lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee

v.

Juan Martinez Leanos

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant

____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the Southern District of Iowa - Des Moines

____________

 Submitted: April 15, 2016

 Filed: July 11, 2016

____________

Before LOKEN, BEAM, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

____________

SMITH, Circuit Judge.

Juan Martinez Leanos appeals his 120-month sentence—the mandatory

minimum for his crime pursuant to 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(A)—arguing that the

Appellate Case: 15-3248 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/11/2016 Entry ID: 4424014 
district court should have applied the so-called safety valve provided by 1

18 U.S.C. § 3553(f) and sentenced him below the statutory minimum. We affirm.

I. Background

Martinez Leanos and his girlfriend, Patricia Solorzano, shared a home out of

which they distributed methamphetamine. After several controlled buys, law

enforcement officers secured a warrant to search Martinez Leanos and Solorzano's

home. Inside, officers discovered two drug stashes. In the first drug stash, officers

found a .45 caliber pistol and corresponding ammunition. In the second, officers

found a 9mm pistol without any corresponding ammunition. Martinez Leanos

admitted to officers that he purchased the 9mm firearm from a drug dealer for the

purpose of personal protection. He also told officers that the .45 caliber firearm

belonged to Solorzano. Martinez Leanos, pursuant to a plea agreement, pleaded guilty

to conspiracy to distribute methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1),

841(b)(1)(A), and 846, and being an illegal alien in possession of a firearm, in

violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(5) and 924(a)(2). In the plea agreement, Martinez

Leanos stipulated to possessing both firearms and the ammunition.

At sentencing, Martinez Leanos argued that the district court should sentence

him below the mandatory minimum of 120 months pursuant to the so-called safety

valve. The safety valve authorizes a sentence below the mandatory minimum under

several conditions, including the following: "[T]he defendant did not . . . possess a

firearm or other dangerous weapon (or induce another participant to do so) in

connection with the offense." 18 U.S.C. § 3553(f)(2). Martinez Leanos argued that

Alleyne v. United States, 133 S. Ct. 2151 (2013), should apply to the determination

of whether he possessed a firearm in connection with the offense. If applicable,

Alleyne would require that the government establish the fact of his firearmpossession

The Honorable John A. Jarvey, Chief Judge, United States District Court for

1

the Southern District of Iowa.

-2-

Appellate Case: 15-3248 Page: 2 Date Filed: 07/11/2016 Entry ID: 4424014 
beyond a reasonable doubt to a jury or as part of a guilty plea. Alternatively, he

argued that the facts did not support a finding that he possessed the firearms in

connection with the drug offense. Finally, he argued that he should receive a

reduction pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 3B1.2 because his involvement in the drug operation

was no more than minor.

The district court concluded that Alleyne does not apply in the context of the

safety valve, that Martinez Leanos did possess the firearms in connection with the

drug offense, and that Martinez Leanos was deeply involved in the drug operation.

Martinez Leanos appeals. We have jurisdiction to review this final judgment of the

district court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291.

II. Discussion

Martinez Leanos raises three challenges on appeal: (A) He argues that Alleyne

requires that any fact that can increase—or prevent a decrease of—a mandatory

minimum sentence must be found by a jury or pleaded to by a defendant; in this

instance, the safety-valve disqualifying fact of gun possession. (B) He argues that he

did not possess the firearms in connection with the drug conspiracy. And (C) he

argues that his participation in the drug conspiracy was at most minor.

A. Alleyne Does Not Apply to Safety-Valve Determinations

The district court concluded that the Supreme Court's holding in Alleyne that

"[f]acts that increase the mandatory minimum sentence are . . . elements and must be

submitted to the jury and found beyond a reasonable doubt," 133 S. Ct. at 2158, is not

applicable to facts that determine whether a defendant is eligible under the safety

valve for a sentence below the statutory minimum. Martinez Leanos argues that the

-3-

Appellate Case: 15-3248 Page: 3 Date Filed: 07/11/2016 Entry ID: 4424014 
district court erred because safety-valve ineligibility in effectincreases his mandatory

minimum sentence. We disagree. 2

We review de novo the district court's legal conclusions on this issue. United

States v. Ruacho, 746 F.3d 850, 853 (8th Cir. 2014) (per curiam). Five of our sister

circuits have addressed this specific issue, and all five have declined to extend

Alleyne in the manner that Martinez Leanos proposes. See United States v. King,

773 F.3d 48, 55 (5th Cir. 2014), cert. denied, 135 S. Ct. 1865 (2015); United States

v. Lizarraga–Carrizales, 757 F.3d 995, 997–99 (9th Cir. 2014), cert. denied,

135 S. Ct. 1191 (2015); United States v. Juarez–Sanchez, 558 F. App'x 840, 843

(10th Cir. 2014) (unpublished); United States v. Silva, 566 F. App'x 804, 807–08

(11th Cir. 2014) (unpublished per curiam), cert. denied, 135 S. Ct. 1190 (2015);

United States v. Harakaly, 734 F.3d 88, 97–98 (1st Cir. 2013). We now join these

circuits. Accordingly, the district court correctly concluded that the requirements of

Alleyne do not apply to a district court's determination of whether the safety valve

provided in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(f) applies.

B. Martinez Leanos Possessed the Firearms in Connection with the Offense

Next, we review for clear error the district court'sfactual finding that Martinez

Leanosis not eligible for the safety valve. Ruacho, 746 F.3d at 853. The district court

found that Martinez Leanos "possess[ed] a firearm. . . in connection with the offense"

and was therefore ineligible for a below-mandatory-minimum sentence made

The government argues that Martinez Leanos has waived his Alleyne argument

2

because the plea agreement that he signed stated, "Defendant understands that the

Court may not impose a sentence less than the mandatory minimum sentence unless

. . . the Court finds that Defendant qualifies for safety valve under

18 U.S.C. § 3553(f)." (Emphasis added.) Waiver is the "intentional relinquishment

or abandonment of a known right." United States v. Booker, 576 F.3d 506, 511

(8th Cir. 2009) (quotation and citation omitted). The statement to which the

government points in the plea agreement does not have the kind of intentional or

knowing character required to waive Martinez Leanos's Alleyne argument.

-4-

Appellate Case: 15-3248 Page: 4 Date Filed: 07/11/2016 Entry ID: 4424014 
available by the safety valve. See 18 U.S.C. § 3553(f)(2). Specifically, the district

court noted that officers discovered the firearms in the house with the drugs and that

Martinez Leanos admitted to buying one firearm from a drug dealer for personal

protection. Martinez Leanos argues that the district court clearly erred in so finding

because one of the firearms did not have any corresponding ammunition and the other

belonged to Solorzano, with whom he shared the house. We disagree.

We have held that a defendant possesses a firearm in connection with a drug

offense if the firearm has the potential to facilitate the offense. United States v.

Jackson, 552 F.3d 908, 910 (8th Cir. 2009) (per curiam). Moreover, constructive

possession of a firearm is sufficient to render a defendant ineligible for the safety

valve. Id. Thus, when a firearm is located "where it could be used to protect drugs,"

a district court does not clearly err in concluding that the firearm was possessed in

connection with the drug offense. Id. (quotation and citation omitted). For example,

where a firearm was located five feet away from a drug stash in a defendant's

home—even though the defendant asserted that he never touched the firearmand that

it did not belong to him—we held that the district court did not err in finding that the

defendant was ineligible for the safety valve. Id. at 909–10.

In this case, Martinez Leanos himself connected the firearms to the drugs. He

stipulated in his plea agreement that he possessed the two firearms and ammunition

in the home. Officers found the firearms in the house's two drug stashes. Also,

Martinez Leanos admitted that he purchased one of the firearms from a drug dealer

for his own protection. Last, Martinez Leanos distributed drugs out of that house.

Accordingly, the district court did not clearly err in finding that Martinez Leanos

possessed the firearms and ammunition in connection with the drug offense.

C. Any Error With Respect to Martinez Leanos's Role is Harmless

Finally, the district court denied Martinez Leanos's request to receive a

sentence reduction as a minimal or minor participant in the drug conspiracy under

-5-

Appellate Case: 15-3248 Page: 5 Date Filed: 07/11/2016 Entry ID: 4424014 
U.S.S.G. § 3B1.2. Martinez Leanos argues that this was error. But any error in

denying Martinez Leanos a role adjustment under § 3B1.2 was harmless. The district

court sentenced Martinez Leanosto the mandatoryminimumsentence of 120 months'

imprisonment, a sentence already above the calculated Guidelines range of 87 to 108

months. A reduction to the Guidelines range pursuant to § 3B1.2 would not have

actually resulted in a lower sentence. Accordingly, Martinez Leanos's challenge fails.

III. Conclusion

For these reasons, we affirm Martinez Leanos's conviction and sentence.

______________________________

-6-

Appellate Case: 15-3248 Page: 6 Date Filed: 07/11/2016 Entry ID: 4424014