Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-09-01693/USCOURTS-ca4-09-01693-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
City of Seneca, South Carolina
Appellee
Stephen W. Stone
Appellant

Document Text:

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-1693

STEPHEN W. STONE,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

SENECA SOUTH CAROLINA, CITY OF,

Defendant – Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Anderson. Henry F. Floyd, District Judge. 

(8:07-cv-03401-HFF)

Submitted: April 22, 2010 Decided: May 12, 2010

Before WILKINSON, DUNCAN, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Mary C. McCormac, Clemson, South Carolina, for Appellant. Vance 

J. Bettis, GIGNILLIAT, SAVITZ & BETTIS, L.L.P., Columbia, South 

Carolina, for Appellee. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 09-1693 Doc: 19 Filed: 05/12/2010 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Stephen W. Stone appeals the district court’s order

granting summary judgment in favor of the City of Seneca on all 

of Stone’s claims. We have reviewed the record and find no 

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated 

by the district court. Stone v. City of Seneca, South Carolina, 

No. 8:07-cv-03401-HFF (D.S.C. May 14, 2009). We dispense with 

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before the court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Appeal: 09-1693 Doc: 19 Filed: 05/12/2010 Pg: 2 of 2