Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca13-16-01250/USCOURTS-ca13-16-01250-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
DataTreasury Corporation
Appellant

Document Text:

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

IN RE: DATATREASURY CORPORATION,

Appellant

______________________ 

2016-1250

______________________ 

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark 

Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 90/012,537.

______________________ 

Decided: October 13, 2016 

______________________ 

DEREK TOD GILLILAND, Nix Patterson & Roach LLP, 

Daingerfield, TX, argued for appellant. Also represented 

by CHRISTIAN JOHN HURT, Dallas, TX.

WILLIAM LAMARCA, Office of the Solicitor, United 

States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, 

argued for appellee Michelle K. Lee. Also represented by 

THOMAS W. KRAUSE, ROBERT MCBRIDE. 

______________________ 

Before MOORE, WALLACH, and CHEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM. 

We deny the appeal as moot in light of our order in 

DataTreasury Corp. v. Fidelity National Information, No. 

16-1046.

Case: 16-1250 Document: 40-2 Page: 1 Filed: 10/13/2016
2 IN RE: DATATREASURY CORPORATION

Appellant DataTreasury Corp. also moved for costs 

under Rule 30, arguing the Director should reimburse 

DataTreasury for printing costs relating to unnecessary 

pages included in the Joint Appendix. Docket No. 32. We 

deny the motion, but we caution the Director to carefully 

evaluate which material it elects to cite in the Joint 

Appendix and only include material relevant to the issues 

disputed in a particular appeal. 

Case: 16-1250 Document: 40-2 Page: 2 Filed: 10/13/2016