Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-01316/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-01316-9/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
American Medical Response, Inc.
Counter Defendant
City of Stockton
Counter Claimant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1 

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: EXTENSION OF DISCOVERY CUT-OFF 

CASE NO. 2:05-CV-01316-DFL-EFB 

LACA_769262.1

FOLEY & LARDNER LLP 

2029 CENTURY PARK EAST, SUITE 3500 

LOS ANGELES, CA 90067-3021 

TELEPHONE: 310.277.2223 

FACSIMILE: 310.557.8475 

STEPHEN A. MCFEELY, BAR NO. 54099 

LEILA NOURANI, BAR NO. 163336 

COURTNEY R. HENNING, BAR. NO. 233935 

ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF AND COUNTERDEFENDANT,

AMERICAN MEDICAL RESPONSE, INC., A DELAWARE 

CORPORATION

WULFSBERG REESE COLVIG & FIRSTMAN 

PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION 

300 LAKESIDE DRIVE, 24TH FLOOR 

OAKLAND, CA 94612-3524 

TELEPHONE: 510.835.9100 

FACSIMILE: 510.451.2170 

CHARLES W. REESE, BAR NO. 045805 

TIMOTHY A. COLVIG, BAR NO. 114723 

MICHAEL J. HIGGINS, BAR NO. 151549 

ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT AND COUNTERCLAIMANT, CITY 

OF STOCKTON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

AMERICAN MEDICAL RESPONSE, 

INC., A DELAWARE CORPORATION

 PLAINTIFF, 

v. 

CITY OF STOCKTON, A CALIFORNIA 

MUNICIPAL CORPORATION; DOES 1

THROUGH 50, 

 Defendants. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

CASE NO. 2:05-CV-01316-DFL-EFB 

JOINT STIPULATION AND 

[PROPOSED] ORDER RE: 

EXTENSION OF DISCOVERY CUTOFF 

CITY OF STOCKTON, A CALIFORNIA 

MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, 

 COUNTERCLAIMANT, 

v. 

AMERICAN MEDICAL RESPONSE,

INC., A DELAWARE CORPORATION, 

 COUNTERDEFENDANT. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

CASE FILED: JUNE 28, 2005 

JUDGE: HON. DAVID F. LEVI

Case 2:05-cv-01316-JAM-EFB Document 122 Filed 10/06/06 Page 1 of 6
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2 

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: EXTENSION OF DISCOVERY CUT-OFF 

CASE NO. 2:05-CV-01316-DFL-EFB 

LACA_769262.1

ALL APPEARING PARTIES IN THE ABOVE ACTION, by and through their 

respective attorneys of record, hereby request that the Court order the discovery cut-off 

be extended from December 20, 2006 to January 22, 2007. This request is based on the 

facts immediately below, to which the parties hereto stipulate and agree. 

1. The parties have not previously stipulated to, and the Court has not 

approved, any extensions of the discovery cut-off. 

2. This case involves a large volume of documents that has delayed the 

production of documents. Document production has still not been completed. 

3. Several necessary depositions have not yet been taken or scheduled. These 

depositions cannot be taken until document production is complete. 

4. Based on the foregoing, the parties represent that they believe an extension 

of time is needed to complete discovery. An extension of the discovery cut-off, from 

December 20, 2006 to January 22, 2007, is appropriate. 

/// 

/// 

/// 

/// 

/// 

Case 2:05-cv-01316-JAM-EFB Document 122 Filed 10/06/06 Page 2 of 6
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3 

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: EXTENSION OF DISCOVERY CUT-OFF 

CASE NO. 2:05-CV-01316-DFL-EFB 

LACA_769262.1

5. This stipulation is without prejudice to any position the parties may take in 

any discovery proceeding or any other type of motion, including those mentioned herein. 

The parties expressly reserve all rights, arguments and objections and nothing herein 

shall be construed as an admission that any motion does or does not have merit. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

DATED: SEPTEMBER ___, 2006 FOLEY & LARDNER LLP 

STEPHEN A. MCFEELY

LEILA NOURANI

COURTNEY R. HENNING

By:/S/ Leila Nourani 

LEILA NOURANI

ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF AND COUNTERDEFENDANT, AMERICAN MEDICAL

RESPONSE, INC., A DELAWARE CORPORATION

DATED: September ____, 2006 WULFSBERG REESE COLVIG & FIRSTMAN

PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION

BY: /S/ LAURIE E. SMITH 

 MICHAEL J. HIGGINS

ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT AND 

COUNTERCLAIMANT, CITY OF STOCKTON 

Case 2:05-cv-01316-JAM-EFB Document 122 Filed 10/06/06 Page 3 of 6
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

4 

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: EXTENSION OF DISCOVERY CUT-OFF 

CASE NO. 2:05-CV-01316-DFL-EFB 

LACA_769262.1

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

GOOD CAUSE APPEARING THEREFORE IN THE ABOVE STIPULATION 

OF THE PARTIES: 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the discovery cut-off in this case, previously set 

for December 20, 2006, shall be extended to January 22, 2007. 

IT IS SO ORDERED 

DATED: 10/6/ 2006 

 

 /s/ David F. Levi_____________ 

HONORABLE DAVID F. LEVI 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

Case 2:05-cv-01316-JAM-EFB Document 122 Filed 10/06/06 Page 4 of 6
1 

LACA_769262.1

Case 2:05-cv-01316-JAM-EFB Document 122 Filed 10/06/06 Page 5 of 6
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

PROOF OF SERVICE 

I am employed in the County of Los Angeles, State of California. I am over the age of 

18 and not a party to this action; my current business address is 2029 Century Park 

East, Suite 3500, Los Angeles. 

On September 28, 2006, I served the foregoing document(s) described as: Joint 

Stipulation and [Proposed] Order re Extension of Discovery Cut-Off on the 

interested parties in this action as follows: 

X BY THE FOLLOWING MEANS: 

I placed a true copy thereof enclosed in sealed envelope(s) addressed as follows: 

Laurie E. Smith, Esq. 

Michael J. Higgins, Esq. 

Wulfsberg Reese Colvig & Firstman 

300 Lakeside Drive 

24th Floor 

Oakland, California 94612 

 

X BY MAIL 

X I placed the envelope(s) with postage thereon fully prepaid in the United 

States mail, at Los Angeles, California. 

 

X I am readily familiar with the firm’s practice of collection and processing 

correspondence for mailing with the United States Postal Service; the firm 

deposits the collected correspondence with the United States Postal 

Service that same day, in the ordinary course of business, with postage 

thereon fully prepaid, at Los Angeles, California. I placed the 

envelope(s) for collection and mailing on the above date following 

ordinary business practices. 

 

X Executed on September 28, 2006, at Los Angeles, California. 

X I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California 

that the above is true and correct. 

Melissa Kimmell

Case 2:05-cv-01316-JAM-EFB Document 122 Filed 10/06/06 Page 6 of 6