Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_23-cv-01332/USCOURTS-caed-2_23-cv-01332-4/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Fletcher Legardy
Plaintiff
Taco Bell
Defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

FLETCHER LEGARDY,

Plaintiff,

v.

TACO BELL,

Defendant.

Case No. 2:23-cv-1332-DJC-JDP (PS)

ORDER

On October 18, 2024, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and 

recommendations herein which were served on Plaintiff, and which contained notice 

that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within 

fourteen days. Plaintiff filed untimely objections (ECF No. 14), which in the interests of 

justice the Court has considered.

The Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United 

States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The Magistrate Judge’s conclusions of law 

are reviewed de novo. See Robbins v. Carey, 481 F.3d 1143, 1147 (9th Cir. 2007) 

(“[D]eterminations of law by the magistrate judge are reviewed de novo by both the 

district court and [the appellate] court . . . .”). Having reviewed the file, the Court finds 

the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the proper 

analysis.

Case 2:23-cv-01332-DJC-JDP Document 15 Filed 12/30/24 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The proposed Findings and Recommendations filed October 18, 2024, are 

ADOPTED; 

2. Plaintiff’s first amended complaint, ECF No. 12, is dismissed for failure to 

state a claim; and 

3. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this action. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: December 27, 2024 

Hon. Daniel J. Calabretta

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:23-cv-01332-DJC-JDP Document 15 Filed 12/30/24 Page 2 of 2