Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-00809/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-00809-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Robert Muhabar Khan
Plaintiff
James E. Tilton
Defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ROBERT MUHABAR KHAN,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-07-0809 MCE GGH P

vs.

JAMES E. TILTON,

Defendants. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

By order filed April 30, 2007, the court granted plaintiff thirty days to file a

second amended complaint. In the April 30th order, the court informed plaintiff of the

deficiencies in his complaint. Plaintiff was re-served with this order to his most current address

on June 27, 2007. The thirty day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not filed a second

amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court’s order.

For the reasons given in the April 30, 2007, order, IT IS HEREBY

RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 11-110; Fed.

R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of Title 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within

twenty days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file

Case 2:07-cv-00809-MCE -GGH Document 4 Filed 10/22/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

written objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate 

Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections

within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. 

DATED: 10/22/07

/s/ Gregory G. Hollows

 

GREGORY G. HOLLOWS

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

GGH:035

khan0809.fta

Case 2:07-cv-00809-MCE -GGH Document 4 Filed 10/22/07 Page 2 of 2