Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_14-cv-01389/USCOURTS-caed-1_14-cv-01389-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
City of Fresno
Defendant
Jerry Dyer
Defendant
Jerel Stanfield
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

JEREL STANFIELD, 

Plaintiff, 

v.

CITY OF FRESNO and JERRY DYER, 

Defendants,

No. 1:14-cv-01389-KJM-BAM 

ORDER 

 This court, consistent with Local Rule 240(a), requires “parties to the action . . . to 

appear in person at the [s]tatus [c]onference through lead counsel . . . .” (Order at 1, ECF No. 9.) 

The court held an initial status conference on January 8, 2015. (ECF No. 14.) Counsel for 

plaintiff did not appear at the conference and, as of the date of this order, has not provided the 

court with any reason for the nonappearance.

 Accordingly, counsel for plaintiff is hereby ORDERED, within seven (7) days of 

entry of this order, to show cause why it should not be sanctioned in the amount of $250.00 for 

failing to appear.

 IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: January 11, 2015. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 1:14-cv-01389-KES-BAM Document 15 Filed 01/12/15 Page 1 of 1