Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_11-cv-00751/USCOURTS-caed-2_11-cv-00751-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Corey Coronado
Plaintiff
Constance Neish
Defendant
James Neish
Defendant

Document Text:

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1 

STIPULATION AND ORDER 

SPINELLI, DONALD & NOTT 

A Professional Corporation 

815 S Street, Second Floor 

Sacramento, CA 95811 

Telephone: (916) 448-7888 

Facsimile: (916) 448-6888 

 ROSS R. NOTT (State Bar No. 172235) 

 STEPHANIE D. RICE (State Bar No. 248719) 

 ATTORNEYS FOR Defendants 

 CONSTANCE NEISH, JAMES NEISH 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

COREY CORONADO, 

 

 Plaintiff, 

 vs. 

CONSTANCE NEISH, JAMES NEISH, et. 

al., 

 Defendants. 

________________________________/ 

CASE #: 2:11-CV-00751-MCE-DAD

STIPULATION AND ORDER 

It is hereby stipulated by and between the parties through their respective counsel 

pursuant to FRCP 29(b) that: 

1. This case arises out of a motor vehicle collision that occurred on February 5, 

2009. 

2. On or about June 28, 2011, Judge England entered a Pretrial Scheduling 

Order setting this matter for trial on May 20, 2013. The following additional dates were set: 

 Discovery cut-off: July 20, 2012 

 Expert Witness Disclosure date: September 20, 2012 

3. On or about May 7, 2012, plaintiff Corey Coronado underwent a two level 

disc arthroplasty that she alleges was necessitated as result of injuries sustained in the 

February 5, 2009 incident. As of the date of this Stipulation, plaintiff has not concluded her 

follow up course of care and treatment. She is not slated to return to work until early 

Case 2:11-cv-00751-MCE-DB Document 12 Filed 09/21/12 Page 1 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2 

STIPULATION AND ORDER 

August. 

4. Plaintiff’s surgery in May of 2012 constitutes good cause to reopen 

discovery. If the matter proceeds to trial, the parties will need to obtain updated records 

reflecting her medical treatment, updated records and evidence regarding her employment 

history and job performance, for example. 

5. The parties wish to mediate this case. 

6. Because plaintiff must be significantly recovered/stabilized following her 

surgery before the case may be mediated, the soonest that the parties will be able to 

conduct a mediation will be in the October/November 2012 time frame. The case is more 

likely to settle if the sides are not heavily invested in expert discovery at the time of 

mediation. Accordingly, the parties wish to conduct the mediation prior to incurring the 

expense of retaining experts, disclosing experts, and conducting expert discovery. 

7. The foregoing constitutes good cause extend the judicially imposed expert 

disclosure and expert discovery cut-off dates. 

8. In light of the above facts, the parties hereby stipulate and agree as follows: 

 Discovery is open as to additional medical issues, including as to how 

medical issues relate to plaintiff’s employment/ability to work, and the 

discovery cut-off date shall be December 28, 2012; 

 Expert discovery cut-off date shall be February 28, 2013; and 

 Trial date shall remain May 20, 2013. 

DATED: September 7, 2012 ARNOLD LAW FIRM 

 By: ________/s/_______________________ CLIFFORD L. CARTER 

 Attorneys for Plaintiff 

 COREY CORONADO 

DATED: September 7, 2012 SPINELLI, DONALD & NOTT 

 By: ________/s/___ ___________________ ROSS R. NOTT 

 STEPHANIE D. RICE 

 Attorneys for Defendants 

 CONSTANCE NEISH and JAMES NEISH 

Case 2:11-cv-00751-MCE-DB Document 12 Filed 09/21/12 Page 2 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

3 

STIPULATION AND ORDER 

ORDER 

 The parties’ stipulation and request to extend the judicially imposed expert 

disclosure and expert discovery cut-off dates is GRANTED. The current Pretrial 

Scheduling Order is vacated. An amended Pretrial Scheduling Order will issue. 

 IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: September 20, 2012 

__________________________________ 

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

DEAC_Signature-END: 

c4d6b0d3 

Case 2:11-cv-00751-MCE-DB Document 12 Filed 09/21/12 Page 3 of 3