Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cr-00657/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cr-00657-2/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Alexander Bassignani
Defendant
USA
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

SCOTT N. SCHOOLS (SCSBN 9990)

United States Attorney

W. DOUGLAS SPRAGUE (CASBN 202121)

Acting Chief, Criminal Division

ROBERT DAVID REES (CASBN 229441)

Assistant United States Attorney

450 Golden Gate Avenue, Box 36055

San Francisco, CA 94102

Telephone: (415) 436-7200

Facsimile: (415) 436-7234

Email: robert.rees@usdoj.gov

Attorneys for Plaintiff

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

ALEXANDER BASSIGNANI,

Defendant.

 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CR 06 0657 SI

[PROPOSED] ORDER AND

STIPULATION EXCLUDING TIME

FROM MAY 18, 2007 TO JUNE 29,

2007 FROM THE SPEEDY TRIAL

ACT CALCULATION

(18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(A))

Defendant Alexander Bassignani appeared before the Court on May 18, 2007. 

With the agreement of the parties, and with the consent of the defendant, the Court enters

this order scheduling a motions hearing on July 27, 2007 at 11:00A.M., before the

Honorable Susan Illston, and documenting the exclusion of time under the Speedy Trial

Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(A), from May 18, 2007 to June 29, 2007, the anticipated

filing date of the aforementioned motions. The parties agreed, and the Court found and

held, as follows:

1. The defendant agreed to an exclusion of time under the Speedy Trial Act. 

Failure to grant the requested continuance would unreasonably deny defense counsel

reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of

Case 3:06-cr-00657-SI Document 20 Filed 07/19/2007 Page 1 of 2 Case 3:06-cr-00657-SI Document 22 Filed 07/25/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

due diligence.

2. Given these circumstances, the Court found that the ends of justice served by

excluding the period from May 18, 2007 to June 29, 2007 outweigh the best interest of

the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. § 3161(h)(8)(A).

3. Accordingly, and with the consent of the defendant, the Court ordered that the

period from May 18, 2007 to June 29, 2007 be excluded from Speedy Trial Act

calculations under 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(A) & (B)(iv).

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

DATED: ______7/19/07__________ ___________/s_____________________

ROBERT DAVID REES

Assistant United States Attorney

DATED: ________7/19/07________ _____________/s___________________

STEPHEN SHAIKEN, ESQ.

Attorney for Defendant

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED:_____________________ ________________________________

HON. SUSAN ILLSTON

United States District Judge

Case 3:06-cr-00657-SI Document 20 Filed 07/19/2007 Page 2 of 2 Case 3:06-cr-00657-SI Document 22 Filed 07/25/07 Page 2 of 2