Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-01682/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-01682-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Internal Revenue Service
Defendant
Penny L. Watson
Plaintiff
Robert W. Watson
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ROBERT W. WATSON and

PENNY L. WATSON,

Plaintiffs, No. CIV S-05-1682 DFL JFM

vs.

INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE,

Defendant. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

By order filed January 6, 2006, plaintiffs were ordered to show cause, within ten

days, why this action should not be dismissed. The ten day period has now expired, and plaintiffs

have not shown cause or otherwise responded to the court's order.

IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without

prejudice. See Local Rule 11-110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within ten days

after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections

with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings

and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified

Case 2:05-cv-01682-DFL -JFM Document 6 Filed 01/26/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153

(9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: January 26, 2006.

/001; watson.fsc

Case 2:05-cv-01682-DFL -JFM Document 6 Filed 01/26/06 Page 2 of 2