Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-01830/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-01830-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Karen Proksel
Plaintiff
Snap-On Incorporated
Defendant
Snap-On Incorporated Disability Income Program for Exempt Employees
Defendant

Document Text:

Stipulation For Extension Of Time In Which 

 To Respond To The Complaint; Proposed Order 

LOSANGELES 331902v1 70765-00001 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

MARGARET ROSENTHAL (SBN 147501) 

SABRINA L. SHADI (SBN 205405) 

JENKENS & GILCHRIST, LLP 

12100 Wilshire Boulevard, 15th Floor 

Los Angeles, California 90025-7120 

Telephone: (310) 820-8800 

Facsimile: (310) 820-8859 

mrosenthal@jenkens.com

sshadi@jenkens.com

Attorneys for SNAP-ON INCORPORATED and 

SNAP-ON INCORPORATED DISABILITY INCOME PROGRAM 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - FRESNO 

KAREN PROKSEL, 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

SNAP-ON INCORPORATED DISABILITY 

INCOME PROGRAM FOR EXEMPT 

EMPLOYEES, SNAP-ON INCORPORATED, IN 

ITS CAPACITY AS PLAN ADMINISTRATOR 

OF THE SNAP-ON INCORPORATED 

DISABILITY INCOME PROGRAM FOR 

EXEMPT EMPLOYEES; 

Defendants. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

_________________________________________ ) 

Case No. 1:06-CV-01830-AWI-DLB 

STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION 

OF TIME IN WHICH TO RESPOND 

TO THE COMPLAINT; and ORDER

/ / / 

/ / / 

/ / / 

/ / / 

/ / / 

/ / / 

/ / /

Case 1:06-cv-01830-AWI-DLB Document 12 Filed 02/20/07 Page 1 of 5
2 Stipulation For Extension Of Time In Which 

 To Respond To The Complaint; Proposed Order 

LOSANGELES 331902v1 70765-00001 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WHEREAS, on January 18, 2007, the parties filed a stipulation pursuant to Gen L.R. 6-

144(a) to provide defendants Snap-On Incorporated Disability Income Program for Exempt 

Employees and Snap-On Incorporated, In Its Capacity As Plan Administrator of the Snap-On 

Incorporated Disability Income Program for Exempt Employees (the “Defendants”) a one week 

extension, to January 29, 2007, of the deadline for responding to the complaint; 

WHEREAS, on January 26, 2007, the parties filed a second stipulation pursuant to Gen 

L.R. 6-144(a) to provide the Defendants with an additional extension, to February 21, 2007, of 

the deadline for responding to the complaint, to allow the defendants, among other things, to 

explore whether additional interested parties existed who required notice and an opportunity to 

participate in this action; this extension fell within the 30 day rule for extensions by stipulation 

without court approval; 

WHEREAS, the Defendants are in the process of bringing in counsel regarding the Long 

Term Disability portion of the Plan and procuring the appropriate files necessary to prepare a 

responsive pleading. Accordingly, Defendants require a brief three week extension of time to 

respond to the complaint until March 14, 1007. In light of these circumstances; the parties also 

plan to file a separate stipulation to continue the Scheduling Conference currently set for March 

20, 2007 to a date in early April; 

WHEREAS, no scheduling order has been entered in this case and the plaintiff will not 

be prejudiced if a further limited extension is granted; 

/ / / 

/ / / 

/ / / 

/ / / 

/ / / 

/ / / 

/ / / 

/ / / 

/ / / 

Case 1:06-cv-01830-AWI-DLB Document 12 Filed 02/20/07 Page 2 of 5
 

LOSANGELES 331902v1 70765-00001 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

THEREFORE, it is hereby stipulated by and between plaintiff Karen Proskel and the 

Defendants, through their undersigned counsel, that the time within which the defendants shall 

answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint is extended through and including March 14, 

2007. 

DATED: February 20, 2007 KANTOR & KANTOR LLP 

 By: /s/ 

 TRACY COLLINS 

 Attorneys for Plaintiff KAREN PROKSEL 

DATED: February 20, 2007 JENKENS & GILCHRIST, LLP 

 By: /s/ 

 SABRINA L. SHADI 

 Attorneys for Defendant SNAP-ON 

INCORPORATED DISABILITY INCOME 

PROGRAM FOR EXEMPT EMPLOYEES AND 

SNAP-ON INCORPORATED, IN ITS CAPACITY 

AS PLAN ADMINISTRATOR OF THE SNAP-ON 

INCORPORATED DISABILITY INCOME 

PROGRAM FOR EXEMPT EMPLOYEES 

Case 1:06-cv-01830-AWI-DLB Document 12 Filed 02/20/07 Page 3 of 5
 

LOSANGELES 331902v1 70765-00001 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Based upon the foregoing Stipulation, and finding good cause therefor, IT IS HEREBY 

ORDERED that: 

The defendants Snap-On Incorporated Disability Income Program for Exempt Employees 

and Snap-On Incorporated, In Its Capacity As Plan Administrator of the Snap-On Incorporated 

Disability Income Program for Exempt Employees are granted an extension through and 

including March 14, 2007 in which to file and serve a response to the complaint in this action. 

DATED: February 20, 2007 /s/ Dennis L. Beck 

 Honorable Dennis L. Beck 

 U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

Case 1:06-cv-01830-AWI-DLB Document 12 Filed 02/20/07 Page 4 of 5
5 PROOF OF SERVICE

LOSANGELES 331902v1 70765-00001 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

PROOF OF SERVICE 

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )

) ss 

COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES )

I am a resident of the State of California, over the age of eighteen years, and not a party 

to the within action. My business address is Jenkens & Gilchrist, LLP, 12100 Wilshire 

Boulevard, 15th Floor, Los Angeles, California 90025. On February 20, 2007, the 

STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME IN WHICH TO RESPOND TO THE 

COMPLAINT will be served on the person(s) listed below: 

Glenn R. Kantor, Esq. (SBN 122643) 

Tracy Collins, Esq. (SBN 144307) 

KANTOR & KANTOR LLP 

17216 Parthenia Street 

Northridge, CA 91403 

gkantor@kantorlaw.net

tcollins@kantorlaw.net

Telephone No.: (818) 886-2525 

Facsimile No.: (818) 350-6272

via electronic mail by the U.S. District Court - Live System. 

by placing the document(s) listed above in a sealed envelope with postage thereon 

fully prepaid, in the United States mail at Los Angeles, California, addressed as set 

forth below. 

by personally delivering the document(s) listed above to the person(s) at the 

address(es) set forth below. 

I am readily familiar with the firm’s practice of collection and processing correspondence 

for mailing. Under that practice it would be deposited with the U.S. Postal Service on that same 

day with postage thereon fully prepaid in the ordinary course of business. I am aware that on 

motion of the party served, service is presumed invalid if postal cancellation date or postage 

meter date is more than on day after the date of deposit for mailing in affidavit. 

I declare that I am employed in the office of a member of the bar of this court whose 

direction the service was made. 

Executed on February 20, 2007, at Los Angeles, California. 

 

 CHARLENE E. STAMPS 

Case 1:06-cv-01830-AWI-DLB Document 12 Filed 02/20/07 Page 5 of 5