Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-00686/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-00686-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Javier Solis
Plaintiff
Target Corporation
Defendant

Document Text:

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

JAVIER SOLIS, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

TARGET CORPORATION, 

Defendant. 

No. 2:14-CV-0686-KJM-DAD 

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE 

 On April 23, 2015, upon granting plaintiff’s counsel’s motion to withdraw, the 

court allowed plaintiff 30 days to either hire new counsel or indicate his intent to proceed pro se. 

ECF No. 20. On May 26, 2015, plaintiff requested additional time to find new representation, 

ECF No. 22, which this court granted by minute order on June 8, 2015, ECF No. 24 (allowing 

plaintiff until June 30, 2015 to either retain new counsel or indicate an intent to proceed pro se). 

Plaintiff has not yet indicated he has found new representation, intends to proceed pro se, or 

requested an additional extension. Plaintiff is ordered or show cause why this case should not be 

dismissed. 

 It is hereby ORDERED that: 

1. Plaintiff, within fourteen (14) days of entry of this order, shall show cause why 

this case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute; 

///// 

Case 2:14-cv-00686-KJM-DB Document 31 Filed 07/14/15 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2

2. The dates set in the August 7, 2014 Scheduling Order are vacated and this case 

is STAYED pending plaintiff’s response to this order; and 

3. Defendant’s June 29, 2016 Ex Parte Application to Modify Scheduling Order 

(ECF No. 25) is DENIED as moot. 

DATED: July 14, 2015. 

Case 2:14-cv-00686-KJM-DB Document 31 Filed 07/14/15 Page 2 of 2