Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-08-02194/USCOURTS-ca4-08-02194-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Board of Commissioners of the Housing Authority of the City of North Charleston
Appellee
City of North Charleston Housing Authority
Appellee
Doris S. Grant
Appellant

Document Text:

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 08-2194

DORIS S. GRANT, 

 Plaintiff – Appellant, 

 v. 

CITY OF NORTH CHARLESTON HOUSING AUTHORITY; BOARD OF 

COMMISSIONERS OF THE HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF NORTH 

CHARLESTON, 

 Defendants – Appellees. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Charleston. C. Weston Houck, Senior District 

Judge. (2:06-cv-03242-CWH) 

Submitted: February 3, 2010 Decided: February 16, 2010 

Before MICHAEL, MOTZ, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. 

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Edward M. Brown, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellant. 

Caroline Wrenn Cleveland, CLEVELAND LAW, LLC, Charleston, South 

Carolina, for Appellees. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 

Appeal: 08-2194 Doc: 21 Filed: 02/16/2010 Pg: 1 of 2
2 

PER CURIAM: 

Doris S. Grant appeals the district court’s order 

adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and granting the 

Appellees’ summary judgment motion in Grant’s employment 

discrimination case brought pursuant to Title VII of the Civil 

Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 

(2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible 

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the 

district court. Grant v. City of North Charleston Hous. Auth., 

No. 2:06-cv-03242-CWH (D.S.C. Sept. 22, 2008). We dispense with 

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before the court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process. 

AFFIRMED

Appeal: 08-2194 Doc: 21 Filed: 02/16/2010 Pg: 2 of 2