Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00032/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00032-11/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Arturo Aguilar
Plaintiff
Mark Melkonian
Defendant
Melkonian Enterprises, Inc.
Defendant

Document Text:

{6493/002/00204951.DOC} 1 

____________________________________________________________________________________________________ 

STIPULATION RE SETTLEMENT ADMINISTRATION COSTS AND ORDER THEREON

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

SAGASER, JONES & HAHESY

2445 Capitol Street, 2nd Floor 

Post Office Box 1632 

Fresno, California 93717-1632 

Telephone: (559) 233-4800

William C. Hahesy #105743 

Rose M. Huelskamp #229173 

Attorneys for: Defendants Melkonian Enterprises, Inc., and Mark Melkonian 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

ARTURO AGUILAR, individually and on 

behalf of all other similarly situated, 

 Plaintiffs, 

v. 

MELKONIAN ENTERPRISES, INC., and 

MARK MELKONIAN 

 Defendants. 

Case No. CV-F-05-00032 OWW LJO

CLASS ACTION 

STIPULATION RE SETTLEMENT 

ADMINISTRATION COSTS AND 

ORDER THEREON 

 The Plaintiff and Class and Defendants Melkonian Enterprises and Mark 

Melkonian, by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby STIPULATE and 

AGREE as follows: 

 1. The Court has approved the Joint Stipulation of Settlement in the 

above-referenced matter. 

 2. The Court entered Judgment in this matter on January 24, 2007. The 

parties, through the settlement administrator, have served Notice of the Entry of the 

Judgment. The court has retained jurisdiction of all matters relating to the administration of 

the settlement. 

 3. The parties are in the process of preparing for the distribution of the 

settlement funds and finalizing other closing matters in this case. 

/// 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 1:05-cv-00032-OWW -LJO Document 58 Filed 03/14/07 Page 1 of 3
{6493/002/00204951.DOC} 2 

____________________________________________________________________________________________________ 

STIPULATION RE SETTLEMENT ADMINISTRATION COSTS AND ORDER THEREON

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 4. Pursuant to the Joint Stipulation of Settlement, monies were deposited 

with the Plaintiff’s counsel. Those monies have been held in escrow and have been earning 

interest since deposit. The Joint Stipulation of Settlement provides that any interest earned 

on the deposit funds will be used first to pay any costs of escrow and the remaining interest 

may be used by Defendants to pay the cost of the settlement administration. 

 5. The parties anticipate that the cost of settlement administration may 

exceed the amount of interest earned on the deposited settlement funds. 

 6. As a result, the parties stipulate, agree and request that the Court order 

that the monies necessary to pay all the costs of settlement administration will be paid by 

Defendant Melkonian Enterprises, Inc. into the settlement fund, and that the costs of 

settlement administration will be paid to the settlement administrator from the funds 

deposited by Melkonian Enterprises, Inc. and the interest earned on the deposited settlement 

funds over and above the amount necessary to pay costs of escrow. 

Dated: February 20, 2007 LEWIS, FEINBERG, LEE, RENAKER & 

 JACKSON 

 By: /s/ Daniel Feinberg 

 Daniel Feinberg, 

 Vincent Cheng 

 Attorney for Plaintiff and Class 

Dated: February 20, 2007 SAGASER, JONES & HAHESY 

 By: /s/ William C. Hahesy 

 William C. Hahesy, 

Attorneys for Defendants 

Melkonian Enterprises, Inc., and 

Mark Melkonian 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 1:05-cv-00032-OWW -LJO Document 58 Filed 03/14/07 Page 2 of 3
{6493/002/00204951.DOC} 3 

____________________________________________________________________________________________________ 

STIPULATION RE SETTLEMENT ADMINISTRATION COSTS AND ORDER THEREON

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

 The court having reviewed the foregoing Stipulation, and good cause appearing 

therefore: 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: March 13, 2007 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger 

 Honorable Oliver W. Wanger 

 Judge Of The U.S. District Court 

 Eastern District Of California 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 1:05-cv-00032-OWW -LJO Document 58 Filed 03/14/07 Page 3 of 3