Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_08-cv-01104/USCOURTS-azd-2_08-cv-01104-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Jose Arvizu-Montijo
Plaintiff
United States of America
Defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

JOSE ARVIZU-MONTIJO,

Petitioner,

vs.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Respondents, 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV 08-1104-PHX-SMM (MEA) 

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND

ORDER

Pending before the Court is Petitioner’s Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct

Sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Doc. 1). The matter was referred to Magistrate

Judge Mark E. Aspey for Report and Recommendation. On October 1, 2008, the Magistrate

Judge filed a Report and Recommendation with this Court (Doc. 3). To date, no objections

have been filed.

STANDARD OF REVIEW

The Court “may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or

recommendations made by the magistrate.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C); see Baxter v. Sullivan,

923 F.2d 1391, 1394 (9th Cir. 1991). Parties have ten days from the service of a copy of the

Magistrate’s recommendation within which to file specific written objections to the Court.

28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 6, 72. Failure to object to a Magistrate Judge’s

recommendation relieves the Court of conducting de novo review of the Magistrate Judge’s

factual findings and waives all objections to those findings on appeal. See Turner v. Duncan,

158 F.3d 449, 455 (9th Cir. 1998). A failure to object to a Magistrate Judge’s conclusion “is

Case 2:08-cv-01104-SMM Document 4 Filed 11/03/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

a factor to be weighed in considering the propriety of finding waiver of an issue on appeal.”

Id.

DISCUSSION

Having reviewed the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, and no

Objections having been made by any party thereto, the Court hereby incorporates and adopts

the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation.

CONCLUSION

For the reasons set forth,

 IT IS ORDERED that the Court adopts the Report and Recommendation of the

Magistrate Judge (Doc. 3).

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner’s Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or

Correct Sentence (Doc. 1) is DENIED, terminating this case. The Clerk of the Court shall

enter judgment accordingly.

DATED this 31st day of October, 2008.

Case 2:08-cv-01104-SMM Document 4 Filed 11/03/08 Page 2 of 2