Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-10-06066/USCOURTS-ca4-10-06066-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Ass
Appellee
Bhagirdath
Appellee
Captain Hatchett
Appellee
Immanuel
Appellee
Johnson
Appellee
Sergeant Johnson
Appellee
Lansen
Appellee
Madison
Appellee
Murphy
Appellee
M. Pollard
Appellee
M. K. Riggan
Appellee
P. L. P. Robbins
Appellee
Jarice Royal
Appellant
E. Taylor
Appellee
P. Williams
Appellee

Document Text:

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-6066

JARICE ROYAL,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

BHAGIRDATH, Sergeant, Supervisor; M. K. RIGGAN, Lieutenant; 

LANSEN, MJO; P. WILLIAMS, Ms., MJO; P. L. P. ROBBINS, 

Ms./Mr.; CAPTAIN HATCHETT, Ms.; ASS, Ms./Mr.; M. POLLARD, 

Superintendent, Lt. Col.; SERGEANT JOHNSON, Mr.; E. TAYLOR, 

Major, Mr.; JOHNSON, MJO, Mr.; MURPHY, MJO, Mr.; MADISON, 

Sergeant, Mr.; IMMANUEL, Nurse, Ms.,

Defendants – Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District 

Judge. (1:09-cv-00835-GBL-JFA)

Submitted: July 22, 2010 Decided: July 30, 2010

Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jarice Royal, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 10-6066 Doc: 11 Filed: 07/30/2010 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Jarice Royal appeals the district court’s order 

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We 

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district 

court. Royal v. Bhagirdath, No. 1:09-cv-00835-GBL-JFA (E.D. Va. 

Dec. 11, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the 

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before the court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Appeal: 10-6066 Doc: 11 Filed: 07/30/2010 Pg: 2 of 2