Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-03923/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-03923-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
County of San Mateo
Defendant
Mary Ganley
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1 

Case No.C-06-03923 THE 

Stipulation And Order Re Stay Of Discovery And Of Motion To Strike 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

DAVID P. CLISHAM (SB# 101622)

WILLIAM H. SORTOR (SB# 069424) 

CLISHAM & SORTOR 

Ghirardelli Square, Suite 300 

900 North Point Street 

San Francisco, California 94109 

Telephone: (415) 775-1395 

Facsimile: (415) 775-4298 

Email: davidc1787@aol.com 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

MARY GANLEY, 

 Plaintiff, 

v. 

COUNTY OF SAN MATEO, 

 Defendant. 

Case No. C-06-3923 TEH 

STIPULATION AND ORDER RE STAY 

OF DISCOVERY AND OF MOTION TO 

STRIKE 

Initial Case Management Conference 

Date: September 25, 2006 

Time: 1:30 p.m. 

Place: Courtroom 12, 19th Floor 

 450 Golden Gate Avenue 

 San Francisco, CA

Whereas counsel for Plaintiff Mary Ganley and Defendant County of San Mateo, at the 

Initial Case Management Conference conducted by the Honorable Senior District Judge Thelton 

E. Henderson on September 25, 2006, agreed to request a Settlement Conference before 

Magistrate Judge Chen in the above-captioned matter; 

 Whereas plaintiff and defendants also agree that the outcome of the Settlement 

Conference may have an effect on the further administration of this case; 

 Whereas plaintiff and defendants also agreed that a stay on discovery and a stay of 

plaintiff's pending motion to strike defendant's nineteen affirmative defenses will conserve 

resources and promote the efficient determination of the issues involved at the present time; 

Case 3:06-cv-03923-TEH Document 15 Filed 10/05/06 Page 1 of 2
2 

Case No.C-06-03923 THE 

Stipulation And Order Re Stay Of Discovery And Of Motion To Strike 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 Whereas plaintiff and defendants agreed that a further case management conference 

should be scheduled for Monday, November 13, 2006 at 1:30 P.M. 

 Therefore, it is hereby stipulated and agreed by plaintiff and defendants 

 -to request Magistrate Judge Edward Chen to conduct a Settlement Conference in 

this case at the earliest possible time; 

 -to stay discovery in this case until further order of the Court; 

 -to stay further proceedings on plaintiff's motion to strike defendant's nineteen 

affirmative defenses until further order of the Court; 

 -to schedule a further case management conference on this case in this court on 

Monday, November 13, 2006 at 1:30 P.M. 

 It is so agreed. 

CLISHAM & SORTOR THOMAS F. CASEY III 

 County counsel 

 CAROL WOODWARD 

 Deputy County Counsel 

 EUGENE WHITLOCK 

 Deputy County Counsel 

By: ________/s/_____________ By: ______/s/___________________ 

DAVID P. CLISHAM CAROL WOODWARD 

WILLIAM H. SORTOR Deputy City Attorney 

Attorneys for Plaintiff Attorneys for Defendant 

MARY GANLEY , COUNTY OF SAN MATEO 

 

Date: October 5, 2006 Date: October 3, 2006 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED:____________________ _______________________________ 

 THELTON E. HENDERSON 

 United States Senior District Judge 

L:\LITIGATE\G_CASES\Ganley\Pleadings\Stipulation&Order staying disc. & mot. to strike.doc

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

Judge Thelton E. Henderson

10/05/06

Case 3:06-cv-03923-TEH Document 15 Filed 10/05/06 Page 2 of 2