Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca5-15-41346/USCOURTS-ca5-15-41346-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Pablo Pantaleon Arenas-Ortiz
Appellant
United States of America
Appellee

Document Text:

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-41346

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

PABLO PANTALEON ARENAS-ORTIZ,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 7:15-CR-814-1

Before REAVLEY, ELROD, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Pablo Pantaleon ArenasOrtiz raises an argument that is foreclosed by United States v. RodriguezSalazar, 768 F.3d 437 (5th Cir. 2014). In Rodriguez-Salazar, we rejected the 

argument that the Texas offense of theft is broader than the generic, 

contemporary definition of theft because the Texas offense, which includes 

theft by deception, may be committed by taking property with the owner’s 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

April 20, 2016

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 15-41346 Document: 00513472252 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/20/2016
No. 15-41346

2

consent. Rodriguez-Salazar, 768 F.3d at 437-38. Accordingly, the motion for 

summary disposition is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is 

AFFIRMED.

 Case: 15-41346 Document: 00513472252 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/20/2016