Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-01272/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-01272-2/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
CytoSport
Plaintiff
Glyco Max, Inc.
Defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CYTOSPORT, INC., a California, )

corporation; )

) 2:06-cv-1272-GEB-GGH 

Plaintiff, )

) ORDER CONTINUING STATUS

v. ) (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING)

) CONFERENCE

GLYCO MAX, INC., a Nevada )

corporation, and DOES 1 through )

10, inclusive, )

)

Defendants. )

)

On March 12, 2007, the parties filed a Joint Status Report

(“JSR”) stating that “the parties have reached an agreement in

principle, and are continuing . . . toward settlement and dismissal of

this action” and “suggest[ing] that the Court continue the Scheduling

Conference for approximately 30 days.” (JSR at 5.) Accordingly, the

Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference currently set for March 26,

2007 is rescheduled to commence at 9:00 a.m. on May 7, 2007. The 

///

///

Case 2:06-cv-01272-GEB-EFB Document 15 Filed 03/16/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

The failure of one or more of the parties to 1

participate in the preparation of the JSR does not excuse the

other parties from their obligation to timely file a status

report in accordance with this Order. In the event a party fails

to participate as ordered, the party timely submitting the status

report shall include a declaration explaining why it was unable

to obtain the cooperation of the other party or parties.

2

parties shall file a JSR no later than fourteen days prior to the

status conference.1

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 15, 2007

 

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.

United States District Judge

Case 2:06-cv-01272-GEB-EFB Document 15 Filed 03/16/07 Page 2 of 2