Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-07-07785/USCOURTS-ca4-07-07785-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Tommy Farrar
Appellant
Lieutenant Alford
Appellee
Lieutenant Meridith
Appellee
Lt. Hodge
Appellee
Sergeant McCormick
Appellee
Officer Curtis
Appellee
Officer Diponte
Appellee
Officer Ellis
Appellee

Document Text:

*

Judge Duncan did not participate in consideration of this

case. The opinion is filed by a quorum of the panel pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 46(d).

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-7785

TOMMY FARRAR,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

LT. HODGE; OFFICER ELLIS; OFFICER CURTIS; LIEUTENANT ALFORD;

LIEUTENANT MERIDITH; SERGEANT MCCORMICK; OFFICER DIPONTE,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever III,

District Judge. (5:06-ct-03079-D)

Submitted: August 21, 2008 Decided: September 10, 2008

Before WILLIAMS, Chief Judge, and KING and DUNCAN,* Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Tommy Farrar, Appellant Pro Se. John A. Maxfield, COUNTY ATTORNEY’S

OFFICE FOR THE COUNTY OF WAKE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for

Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 07-7785 Doc: 13 Filed: 09/10/2008 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Tommy Farrar appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed

the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm

for the reasons stated by the district court. Farrar v. Hodge, No.

5:06-ct-03079-D (E.D.N.C. Nov. 27, 2007). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Appeal: 07-7785 Doc: 13 Filed: 09/10/2008 Pg: 2 of 2