Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-01405/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-01405-3/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Scott Cox
Defendant
Robert Janoiko
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ROBERT JANOIKO, 1:06-CV-01405-OWW-LJO-P 

Plaintiff,

vs. SECOND ORDER TO SUBMIT CERTIFIED

COPY OF PRISON TRUST ACCOUNT

SCOTT COX, STATEMENT OR PAY FILING FEE

Defendant.

 /

Plaintiff is a prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42

U.S.C. § 1983. On November 1, 2006, the court issued an order requiring plaintiff to submit a

certified copy of his prison trust account statement for the six month period immediately preceding

the filing of the complaint. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2). On November 22, 2006, plaintif submitted

an application to proceed in forma pauperis. However, plaintiff did not submit a copy of his prison

trust account statement. Plaintiff will be provided another opportunity to submit a certified copy of

his trust account statement in support of his request to proceed in forma pauperis, or pay the $350.00

filing fee. 

Plaintiff is advised that it is ultimately his responsibility to follow procedures at

the prison to insure that the court receives the required certified copy of plaintiff’s trust

Case 1:06-cv-01405-GSA Document 15 Filed 12/08/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

account statement. If plaintiff is unsure how to proceed, he should show a copy of this order

to officials at the prison. 

In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that within thirty days of

the date of service of this order, plaintiff shall submit a certified copy of his prison trust account

statement for the six month period immediately preceding the filing of the complaint, or in the

alternative, pay the $350.00 filing fee for this action. Failure to comply with this order will result

in a recommendation that this action be dismissed.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: December 8, 2006 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill 

b6edp0 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-01405-GSA Document 15 Filed 12/08/06 Page 2 of 2