Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_13-cv-00289/USCOURTS-caed-1_13-cv-00289-9/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Roberto Herrera
Plaintiff
Rouch
Defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ROBERTO HERRERA,

Plaintiff,

v.

ROUCH,

Defendant.

Case No. 1:13-cv-00289-LJO-MJS (PC)

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND 

RECOMMENDATIONS AND DENYING 

PLAINTIFF’S MOTIONS FOR 

PRELIMINARY INJUNCTIVE RELIEF

ECF Nos. 21, 25, and 29

Plaintiff Roberto Herrera, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed 

this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on February 27, 2013. The matter was 

referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local 

Rule 302.

On December 16, 2013, the Magistrate Judge issued a findings and recommendations 

recommending that Plaintiff’s motions for preliminary injunctive relief be denied, without

prejudice. (ECF No. 29.) Plaintiff filed objections on January 6, 2014. (ECF No. 35.)

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this 

Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the 

Court finds the Findings and Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper 

Case 1:13-cv-00289-LJO-MJS Document 39 Filed 02/13/14 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

analysis. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed December 16, 2013, are adopted in full 

and

2. Plaintiff’s motions for preliminary injunctive relief (ECF Nos. 21 and 25) are 

DENIED, without prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 13, 2014 /s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

3.

Case 1:13-cv-00289-LJO-MJS Document 39 Filed 02/13/14 Page 2 of 2