Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-02613/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-02613-2/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Frank Nason
Plaintiff
United States of America
Defendant

Document Text:

U

nite

d

States District C

o

u

rt

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

U

nite

d

States District C

o

u

rt

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

FRANK NASON,

Petitioner,

 v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Respondent.

 /

No. C 04-2613 SI

No. CR 95-319 SI

ORDERDENYING MOTION FOR LEAVE

TO SUPPLEMENT RULE 60(b) MOTION

By order filed November 29, 2006, the Court denied petitioner’s motion for relief from judgment

pursuant to Rule 60(b). (Docket No. 1484 in CR 95-319). On December 1 and 4, 2006, petitioner filed

a “correction” to the Rule 60(b) motion, as well as a motion for leave to supplement the Rule 60(b)

motion. These filings largely reiterate the contentions made in petitioner’s Rule 60(b) motion. For the

reasons set forth in the Court’s November 29, 2006 order, the Court DENIES petitioner’s motion for

leave to supplement. (Docket No. 1491 in CR 95-319).

 (Docket Nos. 1474 and 1475 in CR 95-319).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: December 6 , 2006 ___________________________

SUSAN ILLSTON

United States District Judge

Case 3:04-cv-02613-SI Document 5 Filed 12/06/06 Page 1 of 1