Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-00016/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-00016-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Bert Blondin
Defendant
Jerry Satterfield
Defendant
Michelle Stockton
Plaintiff
UniFirst Corporation
Defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Case No. 2:14-CV-00016-JAM-DAD 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL OF ACTION 

MARY E. WRIGHT, State Bar No. 142886

mary.wright@ogletreedeakins.com 

ANDREA L. FELLION, State Bar No. 262278 

andrea.fellion@ogletreedeakins.com 

OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, P.C. 

Steuart Tower, Suite 1300 

One Market Plaza 

San Francisco, CA 94105 

Telephone: 415.442.4810 

Facsimile: 415.442.4870 

Attorneys for Defendants 

UNIFIRST CORPORATION and JERRY SATTERFIELD 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SACRAMENTO DIVISION 

MICHELLE STOCKTON, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

UNIFIRST CORPORATION, a corporation, 

BERT BLONDIN an individual, JERRY 

SATTERFIELD an individual, and DOES 1-

100, inclusive, 

Defendants. 

Case No. 2:14-CV-00016-JAM-DAD

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO DISMISS 

ACTION WITH PREJUDICE 

Complaint Filed: November 5, 2013 

Case 2:14-cv-00016-JAM-DAD Document 23 Filed 05/26/15 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1 Case No. 2:14-CV-00016-JAM-DAD 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL OF ACTION 

TO THE CLERK OF THE ABOVE-ENTITLED COURT: 

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Plaintiff Michelle Stockton (“Stockton”) and Defendant 

UniFirst Corporation (“UniFirst”), by and through their undersigned counsel, hereby submit this 

stipulation and proposed order to dismiss the action with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of 

Civil Procedure § 41(a). 

STIPULATION 

WHEREAS Parties agreed to arbitrate this matter before JAMS pursuant to their 

Arbitration Agreement; 

WHEREAS JAMS Granted UniFirst’s Motion to Dismiss, the order for which is attached as 

Exhibit A, and Denied UniFirst’s Motion for Fees and Costs, the order for which is attached as 

Exhibit B; 

NOW, THEREFORE, Stockton and UniFirst hereby stipulate that all of Plaintiff’s claims 

against Defendant in the above-captioned matter be dismissed with prejudice, without costs or fees 

awarded to either party, pursuant to JAMS’ final award. 

DATED: May 22, 2015 OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & 

STEWART, P.C. 

By: /s/ Andrea Fellion 

Mary E. Wright 

Andrea L. Fellion 

Attorneys for Defendants 

UNIFIRST CORPORATION 

DATED: May 22, 2015 THYBERGLAW

By: /s/ Greg Thyberg (as authorized on May 22, 2015) 

Gregory A. Thyberg 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

Michelle Stockton 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: 5/22/2015 /s/ John A. Mendez 

Hon. John A. Mendez 

United States District Court Judge 

Case 2:14-cv-00016-JAM-DAD Document 23 Filed 05/26/15 Page 2 of 2