Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-01759/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-01759-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Aurora Bank, FSB
Defendant
Aurora Loan Services LLC
Defendant
Cal-Western Reconveyance Corp.
Defendant
Citibank, N.A.
Defendant
Charles Gabris
Plaintiff
Marlene Gabris
Plaintiff
Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc.
Defendant

Document Text:

{29985062;1} 1 CASE NO. 2:14-CV-01759-JAM-KJN

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFFS' 

FIRST AMENDED COMPLIANT 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – WESTERN DIVISION 

CHARLES GABRIS and MARLENE GABRIS,

 Plaintiffs, 

v. 

AURORA LOAN SERVICES, LLC; AURORA 

BANK, FSB; CITIBANK, N.A., AS TRUSTEE, 

IN TRUST FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE 

HOLDERS OF STRUCTURED ASSET 

SECURITIES CORPORATION, MORTGAGE 

PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 

2004-23XS; CAL-WESTERN 

RECONVEYANCE CORP.; MORTGAGE 

ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, 

INC.; and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, 

 Defendants. 

Case No. Case No. 2:14-cv-01759-JAM-KJN

Assigned to the Hon. John A. Mendez 

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO 

EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO 

PLAINTIFFS' FIRST AMENDED 

COMPLAINT 

FAC Served: November 18, 2014 

Current Response Date: December 8, 2012 

New Response Date: December 22, 2012 

FAC Filed: November 18, 2014 

Complaint Filed: May 13, 2014 

Trial Date: None 

THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon the stipulation by and between plaintiffs Charles 

Gabris and Marlene Gabris (plaintiffs) and defendants Aurora Loan Services LLC (Aurora), Aurora 

Commercial Corp., successor entity to Aurora Bank FSB (ACC), CitiBank, N.A., as Trustee, in Trust 

for the Benefit of the Holders of Structured Asset Securities Corporation, Mortgage Pass-Through 

Certificates, Series 2004-23XS (CitiBank), and Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. 

(MERS) (collectively, defendants) to extend time to respond to plaintiffs' first amended complaint 

(FAC) by fourteen (14) days. 

Case 2:14-cv-01759-JAM-KJN Document 13 Filed 12/03/14 Page 1 of 4
{29985062;1} 2 CASE NO. 2:14-CV-01759-JAM-KJN

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFFS' 

FIRST AMENDED COMPLIANT 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, the Court approves the Stipulation and orders as follows: 

1. Defendants shall have up to and until December 22, 2014 to file their response to 

plaintiffs' FAC; 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: 12/2/2014 

/s/ John A. Mendez____________ 

 Hon. John A. Mendez 

United States District Court Judge 

Case 2:14-cv-01759-JAM-KJN Document 13 Filed 12/03/14 Page 2 of 4
{29985062;1} 1 CASE NO. 2:14-CV-01759-JAM-KJN

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFFS' 

FIRST AMENDED COMPLIANT 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

PROOF OF SERVICE 

I am employed in the City and County of Denver, State of Colorado. I am over the age of 18 

and not a party to the within action. My business address is 1400 Wewatta Street, Suite 500, 

Denver, Colorado 80202. 

On December 2, 2014, I served the following documents by placing a true copy thereof in a 

sealed envelope(s) on the persons below as follows: 

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO 

PLAINTIFFS' FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT 

Stephen J. Foondos, Esq. 

Danny A. Barak, Esq. 

UNITED LAW CENTER 

3013 Douglas Blvd., Suite 200 

Roseville, CA 95661 

Telephone: (916) 367-0630 

Facsimile: (916) 265-9000 

Counsel for Plaintiffs 

 (MAIL) I placed the envelope for collection and mailing, following our ordinary 

business practices. I am readily familiar with this firm’s practice for collecting and 

processing correspondence for mailing. On the same day that correspondence is placed 

for collection and mailing, it is deposited in the ordinary course of business with the 

United States Postal Service, in a sealed envelope with postage fully prepaid. I am a 

resident or employed in the county where the mailing occurred. The envelope or 

package was placed in the mail at Denver, Colorado. 

 (OVERNIGHT DELIVERY) I deposited in a box or other facility regularly maintained 

by Federal Express , an express service carrier, or delivered to a courier or driver 

authorized by said express service carrier to receive documents, a true copy of the 

foregoing document in sealed envelopes or packages designated by the express service 

carrier, addressed as stated above, with fees for overnight delivery paid or provided for. 

 (MESSENGER SERVICE) I served the documents by placing them in an envelope or 

package addressed to the persons at the addresses listed and provided them to a 

professional messenger service for service. A separate Personal Proof of Service 

provided by the professional messenger service will be filed under separate cover. 

 (FACSIMILE) Based on an agreement of the parties to accept service by fax 

transmission, I faxed the documents to the persons at the fax numbers listed. No error 

was reported by the fax machine that I used. A copy of the record of the fax 

transmission, which I printed out, is attached. 

Case 2:14-cv-01759-JAM-KJN Document 13 Filed 12/03/14 Page 3 of 4
{29985062;1} 2 CASE NO. 2:14-CV-01759-JAM-KJN

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFFS' 

FIRST AMENDED COMPLIANT 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 (E-MAIL or ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION) Based on a court order or an agreement 

of the parties to accept service by e-mail or electronic transmission, I caused the 

documents to be sent to the persons at the e-mail addresses listed. I did not receive, 

within a reasonable time after the transmission, any electronic message or other 

indication that the transmission was unsuccessful. 

 (CM/ECF Electronic Filing) I caused the above document(s) to be transmitted to the 

office(s) of the addressee(s) listed above by electronic mail at the e-mail address(es) set 

forth above pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P.5(d)(1). “A Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) is 

generated automatically by the ECF system upon completion of an electronic filing. The 

NEF, when e-mailed to the e-mail address of record in the case, shall constitute the proof 

of service as required by Fed.R.Civ.P.5(d)(1). A copy of the NEF shall be attached to 

any document served in the traditional manner upon any party appearing pro se.” 

I declare under penalty of perjury that I am employed in the office of a member of the bar of 

this Court at whose direction this service was made and that the foregoing is true and correct. 

 (State) I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that 

the above is true and correct. 

 (Federal) I declare that I am employed in the office of a member of the Bar of this Court at 

whose direction the service was made. I declare under penalty of perjury under 

the laws of the United States of America that the above is true and correct. 

Executed on December 2, 2014, at Denver, Colorado. 

Tamara Landgren 

(Type or print name) (Signature) 

Case 2:14-cv-01759-JAM-KJN Document 13 Filed 12/03/14 Page 4 of 4