Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca8-15-02100/USCOURTS-ca8-15-02100-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
James Melvin Lewis
Appellant
Navient Solutions, Inc.
Appellee

Document Text:

United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 15-2100

___________________________

James Melvin Lewis

lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant

v.

Navient Solutions, Inc., formerly known as Sallie Mae, Inc.

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee

____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the Western District of Missouri - Kansas City

____________

 Submitted: October 7, 2015

 Filed: October 14, 2015

[Unpublished]

____________

Before LOKEN, BOWMAN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

____________

PER CURIAM.

James Lewis brought this pro se action against Navient Solutions, Inc.,

asserting violations ofthe Fair Credit Reporting Act, among other claims. He appeals

Appellate Case: 15-2100 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/14/2015 Entry ID: 4325935 
from the orders of the District Court granting summary judgment in favor of Navient 1

and denying his post-judgment motion under Rule 59(e) of the Federal Rules of Civil

Procedure.

We have carefully reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments on appeal,

and we conclude that summary judgment was properly granted. See Anderson v.

EMC Mortg. Corp., 631 F.3d 905, 906 (8th Cir. 2011) (reviewing the grant of

summary judgment de novo). We further conclude that the denial of post-judgment

relief was not an abuse of discretion. See Innovative Home Health Care, Inc. v.

P.T.-O.T. Assocs. of the Black Hills, 141 F.3d 1284, 1286 (8th Cir. 1998) (standard

of review).

Accordingly, we affirm.

______________________________

The Honorable Brian C. Wimes, United States District Judge for the Western 1

District of Missouri.

-2-

Appellate Case: 15-2100 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/14/2015 Entry ID: 4325935