Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cr-00267/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cr-00267-4/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Joe Milam Cathey
Defendant
USA
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIP & [PROP.] ORDER

CR 06-327 SI

KEVIN V. RYAN (CSBN 118321)

United States Attorney

MARK L. KROTOSKI (CSBN 138549)

Chief, Criminal Division

TRACIE L. BROWN (CSBN 184339)

Assistant United States Attorney

450 Golden Gate Avenue, Box 36055

San Francisco, CA 94102

Telephone: (415) 436-6917

Facsimile: (415) 436-7234

Attorneys for Plaintiff

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

JOE MILAM CATHEY,

Defendant.

 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CR 06-267 SI

[PROPOSED] ORDER AND STIPULATION

(1) EXCLUDING TIME FR OM

SEPTEMBER 1, 2006 TO SEPTEMBER 22,

2006 FROM THE SPEEDY TRIAL ACT

CALCULATION 

(18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(A))

The parties appeared before the Honorable Susan Illston on September 1, 2006. 

With the agreement of counsel for both parties, the Court found and held as follows:

1. The parties agree to an exclusion of time under the Speedy Trial Act from September 1,

2006 to September 22, 2006, in light of the need for the government to produce recentlyrequested discovery, for the defense counsel to review that discovery with his client and discuss

an appropriate disposition with the government. Failure to grant the requested continuance

would unreasonably deny defense counsel reasonable time necessary for effective preparation,

taking into account the exercise of due diligence as well as the travel schedule of the defendant’s

counsel, and would deny the defendant continuity of counsel. 

Case 3:06-cr-00267-SI Document 21 Filed 09/07/2006 Page 1 of 2
 Case 3:06-cr-00267-SI Document 22 Filed 09/12/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIP & [PROP.] ORDER

CR 06-327 SI 2

2. Given these circumstances, the Court found that the ends of justice served by excluding 

the period from September 1, 2006 to September 22, 2006 outweigh the best interest of the

public and the defendant in a speedy trial. Id. § 3161(h)(8)(A). 

3. Accordingly, and with the consent of the defendant, the Court ordered that the period from

September 1, 2006 to September 22, 2006 be excluded from Speedy Trial Act calculations under

18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(A) & (B)(iv). 

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

DATED: September 7, 2006 /S/ 

TRACIE L. BROWN

Assistant United States Attorney

DATED: September 5, 2006 /S/ 

 STEVEN KALAR

Attorney for Joe Milam Cathey

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED:_____________________ ________________________________

THE HON. SUSAN ILLSTON

United States District Judge

Case 3:06-cr-00267-SI Document 21 Filed 09/07/2006 Page 2 of 2
 Case 3:06-cr-00267-SI Document 22 Filed 09/12/06 Page 2 of 2