Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cr-00733/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cr-00733-3/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Alan John Reyes
Defendant
USA
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Excluding Time - CR 06-0733 SI 1

KEVIN V. RYAN (CSBN 118321)

United States Attorney

MARK L. KROTOSKI (CSBN 138549) 

Chief, Criminal Division

JULIE A. ARBUCKLE (CSBN 193425)

Assistant United States Attorney

450 Golden Gate Avenue, Box 36055

San Francisco, California 94102

Telephone: (415) 436-7102

Facsimile: (415) 436-7234

Attorneys for the United States of America

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

ALAN JOHN REYES,

Defendant.

 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CR 06 0733 SI

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]

ORDER EXCLUDING TIME

On January 12, 2007, the parties in this case appeared before the Court and stipulated that

time should be excluded from the Speedy Trial Act calculations from January 12, 2007 to March

16, 2007 for effective preparation of and continuity of counsel, and consideration of a change of

plea, in that both parties’ counsel will be unavailable during portions of this period and defense

counsel required adequate time to obtain and review information relevant to whether there will

be a change of plea. The parties represented that granting the continuance was the reasonable

time necessary for effective preparation of and continuity of counsel, taking into account the

exercise of due diligence. See 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(B)(iv). The parties also agreed that the

ends of justice served by granting such a continuance outweighed the best interests of the public

Case 3:06-cr-00733-SI Document 17 Filed 01/30/2007 Page 1 of 2
 Case 3:06-cr-00733-SI Document 18 Filed 02/01/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Excluding Time - CR 06-0733 SI 2

and the defendant in a speedy trial. See 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(A). 

SO STIPULATED:

KEVIN V. RYAN

United States Attorney

DATED: January 19, 2007 __________/s/_____________

JULIE A. ARBUCKLE

Assistant United States Attorney 

DATED: January 29, 2007 __________/s/_____________

STEVEN KALAR

Attorney for Defendant Alan John Reyes

As the Court found on January 12, 2007, and for the reasons stated above, the Court finds

that the ends of justice served by the continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the

defendant in a speedy trial and that time should be excluded from the Speedy Trial Act

calculations from January 12, 2007 to March 16, 2007 for effective preparation of and continuity

of counsel. See 18 U.S.C. §3161 (h)(8)(A). The failure to grant the requested continuance

would deny the parties continuity of counsel, and reasonable time necessary for effective

preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence, and would result in a miscarriage

of justice. See 18 U.S.C. §3161(h)(8)(B)(iv). 

SO ORDERED.

DATED:______________ _____________________________________

 Susan Illston 

United States District Judge 

Case 3:06-cr-00733-SI Document 17 Filed 01/30/2007 Page 2 of 2
 Case 3:06-cr-00733-SI Document 18 Filed 02/01/07 Page 2 of 2