Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00466/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00466-5/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Cooper
Defendant
Curtis
Defendant
Moreno
Defendant
Thomas
Defendant
Robert Trevino
Plaintiff
Whitten
Defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ROBERT TREVINO,

Plaintiff,

vs.

WHITTEN, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

1:05-cv-00466-OWW-SMS-P

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS (Doc. 13)

ORDER DISMISSING CERTAIN

CLAIMS AND DEFENDANTS

Plaintiff Robert Trevino (“plaintiff”), a state prisoner

proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, has filed this civil

rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter

was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72-302.

On October 18, 2005, the Magistrate Judge filed a Findings

and Recommendations herein which was served on plaintiff and

which contained notice to plaintiff that an objection to the

Findings and Recommendations, if any, was to be filed within

thirty days. Plaintiff did not file an objection to the Findings

and Recommendations.

//

Case 1:05-cv-00466-OWW -SMS Document 16 Filed 11/30/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C.

§ 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 73-305, this Court has conducted a

de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the

entire file, the Court finds the Findings and Recommendations to

be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed October 18,

2005, is ADOPTED IN FULL;

2. This action shall proceed on plaintiff’s complaint,

filed April 11, 2005, against defendants Thomas and Curtis for

violating plaintiff’s right of access to the courts;

3. Plaintiff’s due process/access to the courts claim(s)

based on the handling of his inmate appeals are DISMISSED for

failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted;

4. Plaintiff’s equal protection claim is DISMISSED for

failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted; and,

5. Defendants Whitten, Cooper, and Moreno are DISMISSED

from this action based on plaintiff’s failure to state any claims

upon which relief may be granted against them.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: November 29, 2005 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger 

emm0d6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:05-cv-00466-OWW -SMS Document 16 Filed 11/30/05 Page 2 of 2