Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca5-03-10369/USCOURTS-ca5-03-10369-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Clarence Wayne Robinson
Appellant
United States of America
Appellee

Document Text:

*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

February 17, 2004

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 03-10369

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

CLARENCE WAYNE ROBINSON,

Defendant-Appellant.

 

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:02-CR-246-ALL-G

 

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Clarence Wayne Robinson was convicted after a jury trial of

possession with intent to distribute cocaine base in violation of

21 U.S.C. § 841(a), (b)(1)(C); possession of a firearm during and

in relation to a drug trafficking crime in violation of 18 U.S.C.

§ 924(c)(1)(A); and possession of a firearm by a convicted felon in

violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(1) and 924(e). He appeals,

arguing that the district court erred in ruling that he did not

 Case: 03-10369 Document: 005142344 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/17/2004
1See United States v. Gomez, 276 F.3d 694, 697 (5th Cir.

2001); United States v. Ibarra, 948 F.2d 903, 906 (5th Cir. 1992).

2

have standing to raise a Fourth Amendment challenge to the validity

of the search of an apartment.

Although Robinson may have had a subjective expectation of

privacy in the apartment, any such expectation was not one which

society would recognize as reasonable.1 The district court did not

err in ruling that Robinson did not have a reasonable expectation

of privacy in the apartment.

AFFIRMED.

 Case: 03-10369 Document: 005142344 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/17/2004