Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-10-06447/USCOURTS-ca4-10-06447-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Boyd Bennett

Orlando Rapheal Clark
Appellant
Officer Harrison
Appellee
Lawrence Solomon

Document Text:

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-6447

ORLANDO RAPHEAL CLARK,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

OFFICER HARRISON,

Defendant – Appellee,

and

BOYD BENNETT; LAWRENCE SOLOMON,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever III, 

District Judge. (5:08-ct-03114-D)

Submitted: July 27, 2010 Decided: August 6, 2010

Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and WILKINSON and KEENAN, Circuit 

Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Orlando Rapheal Clark, Appellant Pro Se. James Philip Allen, 

Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for 

Appellee.

Appeal: 10-6447 Doc: 14 Filed: 08/06/2010 Pg: 1 of 3
2

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 10-6447 Doc: 14 Filed: 08/06/2010 Pg: 2 of 3
3

PER CURIAM:

Orlando Rapheal Clark appeals the district court’s 

order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. 

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district 

court. Clark v. Harrison, No. 5:08-ct-03114-D (E.D.N.C. Mar. 

12, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

AFFIRMED

Appeal: 10-6447 Doc: 14 Filed: 08/06/2010 Pg: 3 of 3