Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_09-cv-02984/USCOURTS-caed-2_09-cv-02984-3/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Robert Beard
Plaintiff
Britt
Defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ROBERT BEARD,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-09-2984 GGH P

vs.

MR. BRITT,

Defendant. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

By order filed November 16, 2009, the court granted plaintiff twenty-eight days to

file an amended complaint. In the November 16th order, the court informed plaintiff of the

deficiencies in his complaint. The twenty-eight day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not

filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court’s order.

For the reasons given in the November 16, 2009, order, IT IS HEREBY

RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed with prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R.

Civ. P. 41(b). The Clerk is directed to assign a district judge to this case.

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of Title 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within

twenty-one days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file

written objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate 

Case 2:09-cv-02984-JAM-GGH Document 8 Filed 01/21/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections

within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. 

DATED: January 21, 2010

 /s/ Gregory G. Hollows

 

GREGORY G. HOLLOWS

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

bear2984.fta

Case 2:09-cv-02984-JAM-GGH Document 8 Filed 01/21/10 Page 2 of 2