Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca5-14-20679/USCOURTS-ca5-14-20679-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Ronald Norman
Appellant
United States of America
Appellee

Document Text:

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-20679

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

RONALD NORMAN,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:02-CR-668

Before KING, CLEMENT, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Ronald Norman has moved for leave 

to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 

U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). 

Norman has filed a response as well as a motion for leave to file a supplemental 

response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the 

record reflected therein, as well as Norman’s responses. We concur with 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

February 3, 2016

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 14-20679 Document: 00513368150 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/03/2016
No. 14-20679

2

counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for 

appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw and 

Norman’s motion for leave to file a supplemental response are GRANTED, 

counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS 

DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 14-20679 Document: 00513368150 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/03/2016