Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-03039/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-03039-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Paul Eric Antoine
Plaintiff

Document Text:

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

In Re.

PAUL ERIC ANTOINE, 

Plaintiff. /

No. C 07-3039 SI (pr)

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

This action was opened as a civil action on June 12, 2007 when the court received from

plaintiff a document that complained about conditions of confinement at his prison and

attempted to plead legal claims in relation thereto. The court construes the document to be a

prisoner's civil rights complaint. On the day the action was filed, the court notified plaintiff in

writing that the complaint was deficient due to the failure to pay the filing fee or furnish a

completed and signed court-approved in forma pauperis application, including a completed

certificate of funds in the prisoner's account and a copy of the prisoner's trust account statement

for the last six months. Plaintiff was advised that failure to pay the fee or file the completed

application within thirty days would result in dismissal of the action. Plaintiff has failed to

provide the court with either the filing fee or a complete in forma pauperis application and the

deadline by which to do so has passed. The action is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure

to pay the filing fee or submit a complete in forma pauperis application. Plaintiff may file a new

action, but should include a filing fee or an in forma pauperis application with a new civil

complaint to commence that new action. Because this action is now dismissed, plaintiff should

not file an application or pay the filing fee in this action. 

Case 3:07-cv-03039-SI Document 3 Filed 09/20/07 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

If plaintiff's intent was not to file a civil action but instead to request an investigation of

conditions he finds disagreeable, the request is DENIED. The court does not conduct

investigations, nor does it compel law enforcement agencies to do so. 

The clerk shall close the file.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 20, 2007 ______________________

 SUSAN ILLSTON

United States District Judge

Case 3:07-cv-03039-SI Document 3 Filed 09/20/07 Page 2 of 2