Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-15-02087/USCOURTS-ca4-15-02087-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Marc R. Labgold
Appellant
Judy A. Robbins
Appellee

Document Text:

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-2087

In Re: MARC R. LABGOLD,

Debtor.

-----------------------

MARC R. LABGOLD,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

JUDY A. ROBBINS, Office of the U.S. Trustee – Region 4,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District 

Judge. (1:15-cv-00123-GBL-IDD)

Submitted: March 31, 2016 Decided: April 5, 2016

Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Richard W. Driscoll, DRISCOLL & SELTZER, PLLC, Alexandria, 

Virginia, for Appellant. Ramona D. Elliott, Deputy Director, P. 

Matthew Sutko, Associate General Counsel, John Postulka, 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C.; Judy A. Robbins, United 

States Trustee for Region 4, Joseph A. Guzinski, Assistant

Appeal: 15-2087 Doc: 24 Filed: 04/05/2016 Pg: 1 of 3
2

United States Trustee, Bradley D. Jones, DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, 

Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 15-2087 Doc: 24 Filed: 04/05/2016 Pg: 2 of 3
3

PER CURIAM:

Marc R. Labgold appeals from the district court’s order 

affirming the bankruptcy court’s order finding that he, within 

one year of filing his bankruptcy petition, transferred a parcel 

of real property with the intent to hinder, delay, or defraud 

his creditors and denying him a discharge pursuant to 11 U.S.C. 

§ 727(a)(2)(A) (2012). We have reviewed the parties’ arguments 

and the record submitted on appeal and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district 

court. Labgold v. Robbins, No. 1:15-cv-00123-GBL-IDD (E.D. Va. 

Aug. 14, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the 

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Appeal: 15-2087 Doc: 24 Filed: 04/05/2016 Pg: 3 of 3