Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-16-06828/USCOURTS-ca4-16-06828-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Reggie Waldo Canady
Appellant
United States of America
Appellee

Document Text:

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-6828

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

REGGIE W. CANADY,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. James C. Fox, Senior 

District Judge. (7:02-cr-00127-F-3)

Submitted: September 29, 2016 Decided: October 4, 2016

Before SHEDD, KEENAN, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Reggie W. Canady, Appellant Pro Se. Edward D. Gray, Ethan A. 

Ontjes, Assistant United States Attorneys, Raleigh, North 

Carolina, for Appellee. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 16-6828 Doc: 6 Filed: 10/04/2016 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Reggie Waldo Canady appeals the district court’s order 

denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for reduction 

of sentence based on Amendment 782 to the U.S. Sentencing 

Guidelines. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible 

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the 

district court. United States v. Canady, No. 7:02-cr-00127-F-3

(E.D.N.C. June 3, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because 

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Appeal: 16-6828 Doc: 6 Filed: 10/04/2016 Pg: 2 of 2