Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-00677/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-00677-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Jasper W. Bailey
Petitioner
Stu Sherman
Respondent

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JASPER W. BAILEY, G-60744,

Petitioner,

 vs.

STU SHERMAN, Warden,

Respondent. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. C 15-0677 CRB (PR)

(9th Cir. No. 15-16081)

ORDER DENYING

CERTIFICATE OF

APPEALABILITY

Petitioner has filed a notice of appeal of this court’s April 24, 2015 order

of dismissal of his pro se petition for a writ of habeas corpus, which this court

also construes as a request for a certificate of appealability (COA) under 28

U.S.C. § 2253(c) and Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 22(b). 

A COA is DENIED because petitioner has not made “a substantial

showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). 

Petitioner has not demonstrated that “jurists of reason would find it debatable

whether the petition states a valid claim of the denial of a constitutional right and

that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the district court was correct

in its procedural ruling.” Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000).

The clerk shall forward to the court of appeals the case file with this order. 

See United States v. Asrar, 116 F.3d 1268, 1270 (9th Cir. 1997). 

SO ORDERED.

DATED: June 10, 2015 

CHARLES R. BREYER

United States District Judge

G:\PRO-SE\CRB\HC.15\Bailey, J.15-0677.coa.wpd

Case 3:15-cv-00677-CRB Document 35 Filed 06/12/15 Page 1 of 1