Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-02337/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-02337-4/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
APC Holding & Management, Inc.
Counter Defendant
Joshua Byrd
Defendant
Capital Mailing Services, Inc.
Counter Defendant
Andrew Cody
Counter Claimant
Matthew Kelsoe
Defendant
Robert Rico
Defendant
Salt Creek Media, Inc.
Defendant
Perice D. Sibley
Counter Defendant

Document Text:

-1-

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SACRAMENTO DIVISION

CAPITAL MAILING SERVICES, INC., a 

California corporation,

Plaintiff,

v.

SALT CREEK MEDIA, INC., a California 

corporation; ANDREW CODY, an individual; 

MATTHEW KELSOE, an individual; 

ROBERT RICO, an individual; JOSHUA 

BYRD, an individual; and DOES 1-20,

Defendants.

CASE NO. 2:15-CV-02337-TLN-CKD 

On December 15, 2015, Defendant and Counterclaimant Andrew Cody 

(“Counterclaimant”) filed 23 counterclaims against Counter-Defendants APC Holding & 

Management, Inc., Capital Mailing Services, Inc., and Perice D. Sibley (“Counter-Defendants”). 

(Counterclaim, ECF No. at 23.) On January 5, 2016, Counter-Defendants moved to dismiss 

those claims. (ECF No. 27.) Counterclaimant filed a statement of non-opposition to the motion 

to dismiss, stating that he filed a state court action containing identical claims and therefore seeks

to dismiss the claims before this Court. (ECF No. 39.) 

Case 2:15-cv-02337-TLN-CKD Document 52 Filed 04/12/16 Page 1 of 2
-2-

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

In response to Counterclaimant’s statement of non-opposition, Counter-Defendants have 

asked this Court to make a determination on the merits of their motion and to dismiss 

Counterclaimants claims without leave to amend. (ECF No. 41.) The Court declines to make 

such a determination and will permit Counterclaimant to withdraw his claims. Therefore, the 

Court hereby DISMISSES all claims contained within the counterclaim (ECF No. 23) without 

prejudice. As a result of this determination, Counter-Defendants APC Holding & Management

and Perice D. Sibley are hereby DISMISSED as parties from the instant litigation. The Court 

further DISMISSES Counter-Defendant’s request for judicial notice (ECF No. 28) as moot.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: April 11, 2016

Case 2:15-cv-02337-TLN-CKD Document 52 Filed 04/12/16 Page 2 of 2