Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-14-00445/USCOURTS-ca4-14-00445-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Daniel Johnson Willis
Petitioner

Document Text:

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-440

In Re: DANIEL JOHNSON WILLIS,

Petitioner.

No. 14-441

In Re: DANIEL JOHNSON WILLIS,

Petitioner.

No. 14-443

In Re: DANIEL JOHNSON WILLIS,

Petitioner.

No. 14-444

In Re: DANIEL JOHNSON WILLIS,

Petitioner.

Appeal: 14-445 Doc: 33 Filed: 03/18/2015 Pg: 1 of 3
2

No. 14-445

In Re: DANIEL JOHNSON WILLIS,

Petitioner.

No. 14-447

In Re: DANIEL JOHNSON WILLIS,

Petitioner.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of North Carolina, at Greenville. Malcolm J. Howard, 

Senior District Judge. (4:13-mc-00005-H; 4:13-mc-00006-H; 4:13-

mc-00007-H; 4:13-mc-00008-H; 4:14-mc-00001-H; 4:14-mc-00002-H)

Submitted: March 9, 2015 Decided: March 18, 2015

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Daniel Johnson Willis, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 14-445 Doc: 33 Filed: 03/18/2015 Pg: 2 of 3
3

PER CURIAM:

Daniel Johnson Willis appeals the district court’s 

orders denying authorization to file six civil actions and 

denying his motions for recusal and to amend his pleadings under 

Fed. R. Civ. P. 15. Willis is required to file a motion for 

leave to file a complaint in the Eastern District of North 

Carolina under pre-filing injunctions imposed by this court and 

the district court. We have reviewed the record and find no 

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated 

by the district court. In re: Willis, Nos. 4:13-mc-00005-H; 

4:13-mc-00006-H; 4:13-mc-00007-H; 4:13-mc-00008-H; 4:14-mc00001-H; 4:14-mc-00002-H (E.D.N.C. Aug. 12 & Sept. 15, 2014). 

We deny Willis’s motion to file the appeal under the pre-filing 

injunction, or for permission to appeal, as unnecessary. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Appeal: 14-445 Doc: 33 Filed: 03/18/2015 Pg: 3 of 3