Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-02552/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-02552-2/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Banga Construction & Development, Inc.
Defendant
Xerox Corporation
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STATUS REPORT PREPARED BY PLAINTIFF XEROX CORPORATION; REQUEST FOR

CONTINUANCE OF CASE MANAGEMENT CONFRENCE DATE; ORDER 1

ROSS A. SPECTOR, ESQ. (S.B. #135949)

SPECTOR & BENNETT

A Professional Corporation

50 California Street, 15th Floor

San Francisco, California 94111

Telephone: (415) 439-5390

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

XEROX CORPORATION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

XEROX CORPORATION,

Plaintiff,

vs.

BANGA CONSTRUCTION &

DEVELOPMENT, INC.,

Defendant.

____________________________/

Case No: C05 02552 SI

STATUS REPORT PREPARED BY

PLAINTIFF XEROX CORPORATION;

REQUEST FOR CONTINUANCE OF

CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

DATE; ORDER

1. Notwithstanding that the complaint in this matter was filed on June 22, 2005,

plaintiff had been unable to effectuate service of process upon the defendant. As such on

November 11, 2005 plaintiff applied to the court for an Order authorizing service of process

upon the California Secretary of State pursuant to California Corporations Code Section

17061(c)(1). The court granted said application on November 15, 2005 and the California

Secretary of State was served on November 21, 2005. The proof of service will be filed under

separate cover.

//

//

//

//

Case 3:05-cv-02552-SI Document 12 Filed 11/29/2005 Page 1 of 2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STATUS REPORT PREPARED BY PLAINTIFF XEROX CORPORATION; REQUEST FOR

CONTINUANCE OF CASE MANAGEMENT CONFRENCE DATE; ORDER 2

2. Thereto, plaintiff requests that the case management conference set for December

1, 2005 be continued to January 20, 2006 at 2:00 p.m. to allow sufficient time to pass for

defendant to respond to the complaint, and to the extent defendant does not respond, as is

expected, sufficient time for plaintiff to prepare and for the court to review plaintiff’s application

for the entry of a default judgment.

DATED: November 29, 2005

SPECTOR & BENNETT

A Professional Corporation

/s/

__________________________________

 Ross A. Spector

 Attorneys for Plaintiff

 XEROX CORPORATION

ORDER

The December 1, 2005 Case Management Conference set in this matter is hereby

continued to January 20, 2006 at 2:00 p.m.

DATED:

_______________________________________

Hon. Susan Illston

United States District Judge

Case 3:05-cv-02552-SI Document 12 Filed 11/29/2005 Page 2 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

GRANTED

Judge Susan Illston