Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-01023/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-01023-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Commissioner of Social Security
Defendant
Renada Denise Wright
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RENADA DENISE WRIGHT, No. CIV S-07-1023-CMK

Plaintiff, 

vs. ORDER

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL 

SECURITY,

Defendant.

 /

Plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se, brings this action for judicial review of a final

decision of the Commissioner of Social Security under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). On June 6, 2007, the

court granted plaintiff’s application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and directed plaintiff

to submit a completed summons and copies of the complaint to the United States Marshal, and to

file notice of such submission with the court within 15 days. On June 22, 2007, a copy of the

summons was filed with the court, along with a proof of service indicating that plaintiff had

personally served the summons and complaint. The proof of service, however, was not signed. 

It appears that plaintiff never submitted service documents to the United States Marshal as

directed. 

Case 2:07-cv-01023-WBS -CMK Document 14 Filed 01/31/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

On December 14, 2007, the court granted plaintiff another opportunity to comply

with the court’s June 6, 2007, order. In particular, plaintiff was instructed not to attempt service

on her own. She was directed to submit documents to the United States Marshal who would then

effect proper service on defendant. Plaintiff was cautioned that failure to comply with this order

may result in dismissal of the entire action for lack of prosecution and failure to comply with

court rules and orders. See Local Rule 11-110. 

Plaintiff will be required to show cause why she has failed to comply and is again

warned that failure to respond to this order may result in dismissal of the action. See Local Rule

11-110. The filing of a notice, within the time provided herein, that plaintiff has submitted the

appropriate documents to the U.S. Marshal will constitute an adequate response to this order to

show cause.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff shall show cause in

writing, within 20 days of the date of service of this order, why this action should not be

dismissed for lack of prosecution and failure to comply with rules and/or court orders.

DATED: January 30, 2008

______________________________________

CRAIG M. KELLISON

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:07-cv-01023-WBS -CMK Document 14 Filed 01/31/08 Page 2 of 2