Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_13-cv-01785/USCOURTS-caed-2_13-cv-01785-3/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Commissioner of Social Security
Defendant
Sharon Lee
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

DEBORAH LEE STACHEL

Acting Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX

Social Security Administration

LARA A. BRADT, CSBN 289036

Special Assistant United States Attorney

Social Security Administration

160 Spear St., Suite 800

San Francisco, CA 94105

Telephone: (415) 977-8921

Facsimile: (415) 744-0134

Email: lara.bradt@ssa.gov

Attorneys for Defendant

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SACRAMENTO DIVISION

SHARON LEE,

Plaintiff,

v.

CAROLYN W. COLVIN, 

Acting Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. 2:13-cv-1785-KJN 

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED 

ORDER OF REMAND TO AGENCY

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between Sharon Lee (Plaintiff) and Carolyn W. 

Colvin, Acting Commissioner of Social Security (the Commissioner or Defendant), through their 

respective counsel of record, that this action be remanded for further administrative action 

pursuant to section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, as amended, 42 U.S.C. section 405(g), 

sentence four. 

Upon remand, the Appeals Council will remand the case to an administrative law judge 

(ALJ) for a new hearing and decision. The Appeals Council will instruct the ALJ to reevaluate 

the medical evidence, including, but not limited to, all medical-source opinion evidence 

concerning physical and mental impairments, and explain the weight given to the opinion 

Case 2:13-cv-01785-KJN Document 21 Filed 03/09/16 Page 1 of 2
-2-

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

evidence consistent with 20 C.F.R. §§ 404.1527 and 416.927, and Social Security Rulings (SSR) 

96-2p and 96-5p. The Appeals Council will also instruct the ALJ to further evaluate whether 

Plaintiff has the residual functional capacity to perform his past relevant work and, if 

appropriate, obtain supplemental vocational expert testimony to assist in determining what jobs 

exist, if any, for Plaintiff given his age, education, vocational factors and residual functional 

capacity.

The parties further request that the Clerk of the Court be directed to enter a final 

judgment in favor of Plaintiff, and against Defendant, reversing the final decision of the 

Commissioner.

DATE: March 7, 2016 Respectfully submitted,

 LAW OFFICE OF PETER BRIXIE

/s/ Peter Brixie

 BY: _________________________ 

 Peter Brixie

*as authorized by email on March 2, 2016 

Attorney for Plaintiff

Date: March 7, 2016 BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

DEBORAH LEE STACHEL

Acting Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX

Social Security Administration

LARA A. BRADT

/s/ Lara A. Bradt

 BY: ____________________________

 Lara A. Bradt 

 Special Assistant United States Attorney

Attorney for Defendant 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 9, 2016

Case 2:13-cv-01785-KJN Document 21 Filed 03/09/16 Page 2 of 2