Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_06-cv-00794/USCOURTS-azd-2_06-cv-00794-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Philip Crawford
Respondent
Oley Shlyakhov
Petitioner

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

JDDL

JKM

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Oley Shlyakhov, 

Petitioner,

vs.

Philip Crawford, 

Respondents.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV 06-0794-PHX-DGC

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

Petitioner Oley Shlyakhov (A76-898-871) has filed a pro se Petition for Writ of

Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 alleging that immigration officials were holding

him in detention pending his removal from the United States, but that his removal could not

be effected. Petitioner sought his immediate release from custody on the grounds that his

indefinite detention with no prospect that his removal would be effected in the reasonably

foreseeable future was not authorized by law. See Zadvydas v. Davis, 533 U.S. 678 (2001)

(when there is no reasonable likelihood that a foreign government will accept an alien’s

return in the reasonably foreseeable future, the INS may not detain the alien for more than

the presumptively reasonable period of six months).

It has come to the Court’s attention that Petitioner may have been deported from the

United States on March 29, 2006. Accordingly, it appears that Petitioner is no longer being

held in custody and that this action is now moot.

Case 2:06-cv-00794-DGC--VAM Document 3 Filed 05/22/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

JDDL - 2 -

IT IS ORDERED that within ten (10) days from the date this Order is filed Petitioner

must file a response to this Order showing good cause why this action should not be

dismissed as moot.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court must enter a judgment of

dismissal of this action as moot without further order of the Court if a response to this Order

is not filed within ten (10) days of the date this Order is filed.

DATED this 22nd day of May, 2006.

Case 2:06-cv-00794-DGC--VAM Document 3 Filed 05/22/06 Page 2 of 2