Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-02591/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-02591-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Kelly Bradley
Plaintiff
UnitedHealthcare Insurance Company
Defendant

Document Text:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

 

 , CASE NO. ______________________ 

 Plaintiff(s), 

 

 v. STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS 

 , 

 Defendant(s). 

_______________________________/ 

 

 Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the 

following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5: 

The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process: 

 Court Processes:

☐ Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4) 

☐ Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5) 

☐ Mediation (ADR L.R. 6) 

(Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is 

appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any other form of ADR must participate in an 

ADR phone conference and may not file this form. They must instead file a Notice of Need for 

ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5) 

 Private Process:

☐ Private ADR (please identify process and provider) ______________________ 

_____________________________________________________________________________ 

 

The parties agree to hold the ADR session by: 

☐ the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the order 

referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered. ) 

 

☐ other requested deadline _____________________________________________ 

Dated:___________ ____________________________ 

 Attorney for Plaintiff 

Dated:____________ ____________________________ 

 Attorney for Defendant 

CONTINUE TO FOLLOWING PAGE 

Kelly Bradley UnitedHealthcare Insurance Company 3:16-cv-02591-JST Elise D. Klein /s/ Lisa S. Kantor /s/ August 17, 2016 August 17, 2016 Lisa S. Kantor X Private mediation with Keith Parker Elise D. Klein X 120 days

Case 3:16-cv-02591-JST Document 20 Filed 08/17/16 Page 1 of 2
[PROPOSED] ORDER

☐ The parties’ stipulation is adopted and IT IS SO ORDERED. 

☐ The parties’ stipulation is modified as follows, and IT IS SO ORDERED. 

 

Dated: __________________________________ 

 

 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

 

 

When filing this document in ECF, please be sure to use the appropriate Docket 

Event, e.g., “Stipulation and Proposed Order Selecting Mediation.”

 

Rev. 12/11 

 Page 2 of 2 

DISTRICT Jon 

U

S. Tigar

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

 Judge Jon S. Tigar 

August 17, 2016 X

Case 3:16-cv-02591-JST Document 20 Filed 08/17/16 Page 2 of 2