Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-05501/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-05501-2/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Heather Bartell
Plaintiff
Electronic Document Processing, Inc.
Defendant
Jay Katofsky
Defendant

Document Text:

1

 2

 3

 4

 5

 6

 7

 8

 9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

James A. Michel

State Bar No. 184730

2912 Diamond St. #373

San Francisco CA 94131

415/ 239-4949

(Fax 239-0156)

attyjmichel@gmail.com

Attorney for Plaintiff

HEATHER BARTELL

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

HEATHER BARTELL, an individual,

Plaintiff,

v.

ELECTRONIC DOCUMENT

PROCESSING, INC., a California

corporation; JAY KATOFSKY,

individually and in his official

capacity; and DOES 1 through 10,

inclusive,

Defendants.

_________________________/

Case No. 3:14-cv-05501-RS

STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED

ORDER DISMISSING CASE

Ctrm : 3, 17th Floor

Judge: Hon. Richard Seeborg

Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1), Plaintiff, HEATHER BARTELL, and

Defendants, ELECTRONIC DOCUMENT PROCESSING, INC. and JAY

KATOFSKY, stipulate, and the Court hereby orders, as follows:

1. The dispute between the parties has been settled; therefore, the claims

asserted by Plaintiff against all Defendants in the above-entitled case are hereby

dismissed, with prejudice, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1).

2. Each party shall bear its own costs and attorney fees.

/ / /

/ / /

/ / /

 - 1 -

STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER DISMISSING CASE

Case 3:14-cv-05501-RS Document 33 Filed 09/15/15 Page 1 of 2
 1

 2

 3

 4

 5

 6

 7

 8

 9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DATED: September 14, 2015 ___/s/ Steven S. Nimoy_______

STEVEN S. NIMOY

Soltman, Levitt, Flaherty & Wattles LLP

Attorneys for Defendants

ELECTRONIC DOCUMENT

PROCESSING, INC. and JAY

KATOFSKY

Attestation pursuant to L.R. 5-1(i)(3)

The undersigned attests that concurrence in the filing of this document has

been obtained from each of the other Signatories, which shall serve in lieu of their

signatures on the document.

DATED: September 14, 2015 ___/s/ James A. Michel_______

JAMES A. MICHEL

Attorney for Plaintiff

HEATHER BARTELL

PURSUANT TO THE ABOVE STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: _________________ ________________________

HON. RICHARD SEEBORG

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

 - 2 -

STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER DISMISSING CASE

9/14/15

Case 3:14-cv-05501-RS Document 33 Filed 09/15/15 Page 2 of 2