Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_15-cv-01338/USCOURTS-caed-1_15-cv-01338-2/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Lamar Johnson
Plaintiff
Norm Kramer
Defendant

Document Text:

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LAMAR JOHNSON,

Plaintiff,

vs.

NORM KRAMER, et al.,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

1:15-CV-01338 LJO DLB PC

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION TO 

DISMISS ACTION FOR FAILURE TO 

STATE A CLAIM

(FOURTEEN DAY DEADLINE)

Plaintiff Lamar Johnson (“Plaintiff”) is a civil detainee proceeding pro se and in forma 

pauperis in this civil rights action.

 On January 8, 2015, Plaintiffs William Stafford and Lamar Johnson filed a civil rights 

action in case number 1:15-cv-00038 LJO DLB PC. On September 2, 2015, the Court screened 

the complaint and issued an order dismissing the complaint, severing Plaintiffs’ claims, and 

directing the Clerk’s Office to open a new action for Plaintiff Johnson. On that same date, the 

Clerk’s Office opened the instant case with Plaintiff Johnson as the sole plaintiff. Plaintiff was 

directed to file an amended complaint within thirty days of the date of service of the order. Over 

thirty days have passed and Plaintiff has failed to file an amended complaint. In the Court’s 

order directing Plaintiff to file an amended complaint, the Court expressly stated: “If a Plaintiff 

fails to file an amended complaint in compliance with this order, his action will be dismissed, 

with prejudice, for failure to state a claim.” 

Case 1:15-cv-01338-LJO-GSA Document 7 Filed 10/07/15 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

RECOMMENDATION

Accordingly, the Court HEREBY RECOMMENDS that this action be dismissed with 

prejudice for failure to state a claim. 

These Findings and Recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of Title 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen 

(14) days after date of service of these Findings and Recommendations, Plaintiff may file written 

objections with the Court. Such a document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate 

Judge's Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections 

within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. 

Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 7, 2015 /s/ Dennis L. Beck 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:15-cv-01338-LJO-GSA Document 7 Filed 10/07/15 Page 2 of 2