Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-01402/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-01402-2/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Dennis Smith
Respondent
Larry W. Thomas
Petitioner

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LARRY W. THOMAS, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

v. )

)

DENNIS SMITH, )

)

Respondent. )

 )

1:06-cv-01402-OWW-DLB-HC

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS (Doc. 6)

ORDER GRANTING PETITION

FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

ORDER THAT RESPONDENT

CONSIDER THE APPROPRIATENESS

OF TRANSFERRING PETITIONER

Petitioner is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se with a

Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. 

On February 7, 2007, the Magistrate Judge filed Findings and

Recommendations that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus be

GRANTED, and Respondent be ORDERED to the appropriateness of

transferring Petitioner to an RRC in light of the factors set forth

in § 3621(b), not excluding any other factors deemed appropriate by

the BOP, without reference to the BOP policy promulgated in

December 2002 and without reference to the BOP's February 14, 2005,

amendment to 28 C.F.R. § 570.21, within three months herefrom. 

These Findings and Recommendations were served on all parties and

Case 1:06-cv-01402-OWW -DLB Document 8 Filed 04/20/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

contained notice that any objections were to be filed within twenty

(20) days from the date of service of that order. To date, the

parties have not filed objections to the Findings and

Recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636

(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a de novo review of the case. 

Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court concludes that

the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations are supported

by the record and proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed February 7, 2007,

are ADOPTED IN FULL;

2. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is GRANTED; and,

3. Respondent consider the appropriateness of transferring

Petitioner to an RRC in light of the factors set forth in

§ 3621(b), not excluding any other factors deemed appropriate by

the BOP, without reference to the BOP policy promulgated in

December 2002 and without reference to the BOP's February 14, 2005,

amendment to 28 C.F.R. § 570.21, within three months herefrom.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 19, 2007 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger 

emm0d6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-01402-OWW -DLB Document 8 Filed 04/20/07 Page 2 of 2