Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-07-01287/USCOURTS-ca4-07-01287-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Clyde Casey
Appellant
Jean Casey
Appellant
Gary D. Hicks
Appellant
Wilshire Credit Corporation
Appellee

Document Text:

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-1287

GARY D. HICKS; CLYDE CASEY; JEAN CASEY,

Plaintiffs - Appellants,

versus

WILSHIRE CREDIT CORPORATION,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Greenbelt. Roger W. Titus, District Judge. (8:06-cv02195-RWT)

Submitted: November 30, 2007 Decided: January 7, 2008

Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

M. Albert Figinski, John A. Pica, Jr., Michael W. Reed, Thomas P.

Kelly, LAW OFFICES OF PETER G. ANGELOS, PC, Baltimore, Maryland,

for Appellants. Brian L. Moffet, GORDON, FEINBLATT, ROTHMAN,

HOFFBERGER & HOLLANDER, LLC, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 07-1287 Doc: 40 Filed: 01/07/2008 Pg: 1 of 2
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Gary Hicks, Clyde Casey, and Jean Casey appeal the

district court’s order denying their motion to remand and granting

Wilshire Credit Corporation’s Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) motion to

dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be

granted. We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the record on

appeal and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for

the reasons stated by the district court at the hearing held on

February 26, 2007. Hicks v. Wilshire Credit Corp., No. 8:06-cv02195-RWT) (D. Md. Feb. 26, 2007). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Appeal: 07-1287 Doc: 40 Filed: 01/07/2008 Pg: 2 of 2