Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_16-cv-01108/USCOURTS-caed-1_16-cv-01108-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
California State Department of Transportation
Defendant
Fazle Rabbi
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1 

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT; ORDER 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

JEANNE SCHERER, Chief Counsel 

LAUREN A. MACHADO, Deputy Chief Counsel 

DOUG JOHNSON, Assistant Chief Counsel 

KATHRYN PAPALIA, Deputy Attorney, Bar No. 173472 

NAVTEJ BASSI, Deputy Attorney, Bar No. 188406 

Attorneys for California Department of Transportation 

1120 N Street (MS 57), P.O. Box 1438 

Sacramento, CA 95812-1438 

Telephone: (916) 654-2630 

Facsimile: (916) 654-6128 The State of California is exempt from filing fees under Government Code section 6103

Attorneys for Defendant 

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, FRESNO DIVISION 

M. FAZLE RABBI, an individual, 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

CALIFORNIA STATE DEPARTMENT OF 

TRANSPORTATION, a public entity; and Does 

1 through 25, inclusive, 

 Defendants 

_______________________________________

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Case No. 1:16-CV-01108-LJO-BAM 

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR 

DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO 

PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT; ORDER 

Complaint Filed: July 28, 2016 

 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto through their respective 

attorneys that Defendant CALIFORNIA STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION may 

have additional time within which to respond to plaintiff’s complaint. Therefore, the last day for 

defendant to answer or otherwise respond to plaintiff’s complaint is Thursday, September 29, 2016. 

 Good cause exists for this extension as defense counsel has just been assigned to this case 

and requires time to become knowledgeable about the case to prepare an initial pleading. 

 Response to the complaint is currently due on September 15, 2016. No prior extensions of 

time for responding have been sought or granted and the requested extension is not more than 21 

days. 

 This document is being electronically filed through the Court’s ECF System. In this regard, 

counsel for Defendant hereby attests that (1) the content of this document is acceptable to all persons 

Case 1:16-cv-01108-LJO-BAM Document 8 Filed 09/13/16 Page 1 of 2
2 

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT; ORDER 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

required to sign the document; (2) Plaintiff’s counsel has concurred with the filing of this document; 

and (3) a record supporting this concurrence is available for inspection or production if so ordered. 

/// 

 Respectfully submitted, 

CALIFORNIA STATE DEPARTMENT OF 

TRANSPORTATION 

DATED: September 9, 2016 By: /s/ Kathryn Papalia 

 KATHRYN PAPALIA 

 Attorney for Defendant 

 CALIFORNIA STATE DEPARTMENT OF 

 TRANSPORTATION 

DATED: September 9, 2016 LAW OFFICE OF AMY R. LOVEGREN-TIPTON,

 APLC 

 By: /s/Amy R. Lovegren-Tipton 

 AMY R. LOVEGREN-TIPTON 

 Attorneys for Plaintiff 

 M. FAZLE RABBI 

ORDER 

 Pursuant to the parties’ stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED. Defendant should answer or 

otherwise respond to Plaintiff’s complaint on or before Thursday, September 29, 2016. 

Dated: September 13, 2016 /s/ Barbara A. McAuliffe 

 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

 

Case 1:16-cv-01108-LJO-BAM Document 8 Filed 09/13/16 Page 2 of 2