Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca10-89-08065/USCOURTS-ca10-89-08065-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
First Wyoming Bank-Cheyenne
Appellee
Connie Lenhart Graybill
Not Party
Pat Lenhart
Not Party
Robert J. Lenhart
Appellant
Lenhart Land & Livestock Company
Appellant
The First National Bank in Mitchell, Nebraska
Not Party
Richard L. Vandel
Not Party

Document Text:

A 

FI LED 

United Scates Court of Appeals 

Temh Circuit 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

TENTH CIRCUIT 

FEB1 9 1 1 

ROBERT L. HOECKER 

Clerk FIRST WYOMING BANK-CHEYENNE, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v. 

LENHART LAND & LIVESTOCK COMPANY, a 

Wyoming corporation, and 

ROBERT J. LENHART, 

Defendants-Appellants, 

and 

RICHARD L. VANDEL; THE FIRST NATIONAL 

BANK IN MITCHELL, NEBRASKA; PAT LENHART; 

and CONNIE LENHART GRAYBILL, 

Defendants. 

FIRST WYOMING BANK-CHEYENNE, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

ROBERT J. LENHART, JACQUELINE D. 

Defendants-Appellants. 

LENHART,) 

) 

) 

ORDER AND JUDGMENT* 

No. 89-8065 

(D.C. No. C89-0182) 

(D. Wyo.) 

No. 89-8066 

(D.C. No. C89-0181) 

(D. Wyo.) 

Before ANDERSON, TACHA, and BRORBY, Circuit Judges. 

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel 

has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially 

* This order and judgment has no precedential value and shall 

not be cited, or used by any court within the Tenth Circuit, 

except for purposes of establishing the doctrines of the law of 

the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppal. 10th Cir. R. 

36.3. 

Appellate Case: 89-8065 Document: 010110100003 Date Filed: 02/19/1991 Page: 1 
assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 

34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The case is therefore ordered 

submitted without oral argument. 

The district court in this case entered an order remanding 

the case to state court on August 4, 1989, on the grounds that 

there was no basis for removal of the action and that no federal 

claim was asserted. An order remanding a case to state court is 

not an appealable order. 28 U.S.C. § 1447(d). This case is 

therefore without jurisdiction to review the order remanding the 

case. All other remaining issues in the case are moot. The 

appeal is dismissed. 

-2-

ENTERED FOR THE COURT 

Deanell Reece Tacha 

Circuit Judge 

Appellate Case: 89-8065 Document: 010110100003 Date Filed: 02/19/1991 Page: 2 
UHITBD STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE TEH'l'II CIRCUIT 

THOMAS HOLMES, ) 

) 

Petitioner-Appellant, ) 

FILED 

Uoired States Court of Appcajs 

Tenth Circuit 

FEB 19 1991 

&OBERT L. HOECKER_ 

Clerk 

) 

v. ) 

) 

ROBERT L. PENCE, Special Agent, ) 

No. 90-1204 

(D.C. No. 90-B-19) 

(D. Colorado) 

FBI, Denver Office: and ) 

ROSEMARY N. HU'l'CHINS, Super- ) 

visory Special Agent, FBI, ) 

Denver Office, ) 

) 

Respondents-Appellees. · ) 

ORDER AND JODGIIBR"l'* 

Submitted on the Briefs: 

Before MCKAY, lfOORE, and BRORBY, Circuit Judges. 

After a review of the briefs and the record, we conclude the 

district court correctly dismissed Mr. Holmes' petition for a writ 

*This order and judgment has no precedential value and shall not 

be cited, or used by any court within the Tenth Circuit, except 

for purposes of establishing the doctrines of the law of the case, 

res judicata, or collateral estoppel. 10th Cir. R. 36.3. 

Appellate Case: 89-8065 Document: 010110100003 Date Filed: 02/19/1991 Page: 3 
of mandamus. We AFFIRM the judgment of the district court upon 

the reasons set forth in its Order of April 10, 1990. The mandate 

shall issue forthwith. 

Entered for the Court 

John P. Moore 

Circuit Judge 

-2-

Appellate Case: 89-8065 Document: 010110100003 Date Filed: 02/19/1991 Page: 4