Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_14-cv-00992/USCOURTS-caed-1_14-cv-00992-4/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Centex Homes
Defendant
Centex Real Estate Corporation
Defendant
Travelers Indemnity Company of Connecticut
Plaintiff
Travelers Property Casualty Company of America
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

Case No.: 1:14-cv-00992 LJO GSA

ORDER ON REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE OF CERTAIN CLAIMS OF 

PLAINTIFFS’ FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – FRESNO DIVISION

TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY OF 

CONNECTICUT, a Connecticut corporation; 

and TRAVELERS PROPERTY CASUALTY 

COMPANY OF AMERICA, a Connecticut 

corporation,

Plaintiffs, 

v.

CENTEX HOMES, a Nevada general 

partnership, CENTEX REAL ESTATE 

CORPORATION, a Nevada corporation; and 

DOES 1 through 10 inclusive,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 1:14-cv-00992 LJO GSA

ORDER ON REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL 

WITHOUT PREJUDICE OF CERTAIN 

CLAIMS OF PLAINTIFFS’ THIRD

AMENDED COMPLAINT 

Pursuant to the stipulation by and between plaintiffs TRAVELERS INDEMNITY 

COMPANY OF CONNECTICUT, and TRAVELERS PROPERTY CASUALTY COMPANY OF 

AMERICA (collectively “TRAVELERS”) and defendants CENTEX HOMES and CENTEX REAL 

ESTATE CORPORATION (collectively “CENTEX”), and good cause appearing therefore,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the following claims asserted by TRAVELERS against 

CENTEX within the Third Amended Complaint filed by TRAVELERS on November 6, 2014, are 

voluntarily DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, with each party to bear its own costs as to those 

claims:

• TRAVELRS’ first and second counts for declaratory relief regarding whether 

CENTEX breached the cooperation clause in the insurance policies.

Case 1:14-cv-00992-LJO-EPG Document 39 Filed 01/15/15 Page 1 of 2
2

Case No.: 1:14-cv-00992 LJO GSA

ORDER ON REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE OF CERTAIN CLAIMS OF 

PLAINTIFFS’ FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

• TRAVELERS’ first and second counts for breach of contract.

• TRAVELERS’ cause of action for equitable reimbursement.

The following claims asserted by TRAVELERS against CENTEX within the Third

Amended Complaint filed by TRAVELERS on November 6, 2014, remain outstanding:

• TRAVELERS’ first and second count for declaratory relief regarding CENTEX’s 

claimed entitlement to independent counsel.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

SO ORDERED

Dated: January 15, 2015

 /s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill

United States District Judge

Case 1:14-cv-00992-LJO-EPG Document 39 Filed 01/15/15 Page 2 of 2