Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-01861/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-01861-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Cindy Farias
Petitioner
Fourth District Court of Appeal
Respondent

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CINDY FARIAS,

Petitioner, No. CIV S-05-1861 GEB GGH P

vs.

FOURTH DISTRICT COURT

OF APPEAL,

Respondent. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

By order filed October 13, 2005, petitioner was ordered to show cause, within

thirty days, why his action should not be dismissed. The thirty day period has now expired, and

petitioner has not shown cause or otherwise responded to the court’s order.

IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without

prejudice. See Local Rule 11-110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty

days after being served with these findings and recommendations, petitioner may file written

objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge's

Findings and Recommendations.” Petitioner is advised that failure to file objections within the

Case 2:05-cv-01861-GEB-GGH Document 7 Filed 01/18/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951

F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: 1/18/06 

/s/ Gregory G. Hollows

 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

GGH:035

fari1861.fsc

Case 2:05-cv-01861-GEB-GGH Document 7 Filed 01/18/06 Page 2 of 2