Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-02320/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-02320-2/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
City of Davis
Defendant
Joseph A. Sherman
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOSEPH A. SHERMAN,

Plaintiff,

v.

CITY OF DAVIS,

Defendant.

CIV. S-04-2320 LKK PAN PS

ORDER 

-o0oOn November 10, 2005, this court granted plaintiff’s

motion to file both an original and supplemental complaint and

directed defendant to file a comprehensive answer within twenty

days. Defendant filed its answer November 18, 2005. 

Plaintiff and defendant are directed to file, by Friday,

January 20, 2006, separate status reports addressing the

following matters: 

(a) Jurisdiction and venue;

(b) Anticipated motions;

Case 2:04-cv-02320-LKK -EFB Document 21 Filed 11/28/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

(c) Anticipated discovery and disclosure

of expert witnesses;

(d) Future proceedings, including setting

appropriate deadlines for discovery, motions,

and scheduling the pretrial conference and

trial;

(e) Estimate of length of trial;

(f) Modification of standard pretrial procedures

specified by the rules due to the relative

simplicity or complexity of the action or 

proceedings;

(g) Whether the case is related to any other case,

including any matter in bankruptcy;

(h) Whether a settlement conference should be

scheduled;

(I) Any other matters that may add to the just and

expeditious disposition of this matter.

The court will issue a scheduling order after review of

the parties’ status reports. 

So ordered.

Dated: November 28, 2005. 

 /s/ Peter A. Nowinski 

 PETER A. NOWINSKI

 Magistrate Judge

Case 2:04-cv-02320-LKK -EFB Document 21 Filed 11/28/05 Page 2 of 2