Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_13-cv-00405/USCOURTS-caed-1_13-cv-00405-5/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Commissioner of Social Security
Defendant
Carlos M. Lorigo
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CARLOS M. LORIGO,

Plaintiff,

v.

CAROLYN W. COLVIN,

Acting Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendants.

_____________________________________/

Case No. 1:13-cv-00405-SKO

ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF'S COUNSEL 

FILE A SUPPLEMENTAL 

DECLARATION OR STATEMENT ON 

OR BEFORE OCTOBER 10, 2015

(Doc. 27)

I. INTRODUCTION

On September 4, 2015, counsel for Plaintiff, Steven Rosales, Esq., filed a motion for an 

award of attorney's fees pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b). (Doc. 27.) Plaintiff was served with a 

copy of the motion for attorney's fees by mail on September 4, 2015. (Doc. 27, p. 10.) On 

September 8, 2015, the Court issued a minute order allowing Plaintiff Carlos M. Lorigo

("Plaintiff") and the Commissioner to file any objection to Plaintiff’s counsel’s motion by no later 

than September 21, 2015. (Doc. 28.) (Doc. 23.) The Commissioner filed a response on 

September 16, 2015, noting she had no specific opposition to Plaintiff's counsel's motion. For the 

reasons set forth below, Plaintiff's counsel shall file a supplemental declaration or statement 

showing that Plaintiff's past-due award is $50,249.00.

Case 1:13-cv-00405-SKO Document 30 Filed 09/28/15 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

II. BACKGROUND

Plaintiff brought the underlying action seeking judicial review of a final administrative 

decision denying his claim for disability benefits under the Social Security Act. (Doc. 1.) On 

April 18, 2014, the Court ordered the case remanded for further administrative proceedings before 

an Administrative Law Judge ("ALJ"), and judgment was entered the same day. (Docs. 23, 24.) 

On August 6, 2014, the parties stipulated to an award of attorney's fees and expenses under the 

Equal Access to Justice Act ("EAJA"), which the Court approved. (Docs. 25, 26.) Plaintiff was 

awarded $3,500 in attorney's fees under the EAJA. (Doc. 26.) 

On November 21, 2014, the Commissioner issued a decision finding Plaintiff disabled. 

(Doc. 27-2.) On December 21, 2014, the Commissioner issued a Notice of Award ("Notice) letter 

stating that retroactive disability benefits had been awarded to Plaintiff in the amount of

$39,145.65, which represented "all the money Plaintiff was due through December 2014." (Doc. 

27-3, p. 1.) The Notice letter also stated the following:

We usually withhold 25 percent of past due benefits in order to pay the approved 

representative's fee. We withheld $12,562.25 from your past due benefits in case 

we need to pay your representative.

(Doc. 27-3, p. 3.)

On May 13, 2015, Mr. Rosales filed a motion for attorney’s fees in the amount of 

$12,562.25 with an offset of $3,500 for EAJA fees already awarded. (Doc. 26.) It is Plaintiff's 

counsel’s Section 406(b) motion for attorney’s fees that is currently pending before the Court.

III. DISCUSSION

Pursuant to the Social Security Act, attorneys may seek a reasonable fee for cases in which 

they have successfully represented social security claimants. Section 406(b) provides the 

following in relevant part:

Whenever a court renders a judgment favorable to a claimant under this subchapter 

who was represented before the court by an attorney, the court may determine and 

allow as part of its judgment a reasonable fee for such representation, not in excess 

of 25 percent of the total of the past-due benefits to which the claimant is entitled 

by reason of such judgment, and the Commissioner of Social Security may . . . 

certify the amount of such fee for payment to such attorney out of, and not in 

Case 1:13-cv-00405-SKO Document 30 Filed 09/28/15 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3

addition to, the amount of such past-due benefits . . . . 

42 U.S.C. § 406(b)(1)(A) (emphasis added). 

Although the Notice letter the Commissioner issued in this case indicates $12,562.25 was 

withheld from Plaintiff's past due benefits for attorney's fees, which appears to represent 25 

percent of Plaintiff's past due benefits, the Notice letter also indicated Plaintiff was due $39,145.65 

in past-due benefits. It is not clear that Plaintiff was actually awarded $50,249.00 in past-due 

benefits, although the Commissioner's withholding of $12,562.25 for attorney's fees – assuming 

this amount is 25 percent of the past due benefits – circumstantially supports such an award.

For clarity of the record, Plaintiff's counsel shall file a short supplemental declaration or 

statement that explains how the past-due award of $50,249.00 is the correct amount in light of the 

Notice letter stating past due benefits were calculated as $39,145.65. 

IV. CONCLUSION AND ORDER

For the reasons stated above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that on or before October 10, 

2015, Plaintiff's counsel shall file a supplemental declaration or statement that supports Plaintiff's 

past due benefit award, which Plaintiff's counsel indicates is $50,249.00. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 28, 2015 /s/ Sheila K. Oberto 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:13-cv-00405-SKO Document 30 Filed 09/28/15 Page 3 of 3