Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-04367/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-04367-2/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Jo Anne B. Barnhart
Defendant
Thomas P. Riley Jr.
Plaintiff

Document Text:

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

THOMAS P. RILEY JR.,

Plaintiff,

 v.

JO ANNE B. BARNHART,

Defendant. /

No. C 06-4367 SI

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION TO ALTER OR AMEND

 Plaintiff has filed a motion to alter or amend the judgment. Plaintiff contends that the Court

erred by mischaracterizing certain evidence and failing to address other evidence in the record.

Although styled as a Rule 59 motion, plaintiff’s motion largely repeats the contentions raised on the

merits. For the reasons set forth in the Court’s July 11, 2007 order, the Court finds that plaintiff’s

contentions lack merit and that the ALJ’s decision was free of legal error and supported by substantial

evidence. Accordingly, the Court DENIES plaintiff’s motion. (Docket No. 14).

 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

 

Dated: July 25, 2007 SUSAN ILLSTON

United States District Judge

Case 3:06-cv-04367-SI Document 15 Filed 07/25/07 Page 1 of 1