Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-02813/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-02813-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Commissioner of Social Security
Defendant
Catherine M. Rigsbay
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

CATHERINE M. RIGSBAY, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting 

Commissioner of Social Security, 

Defendant. 

No. 2:14-cv-2813-EFB 

ORDER 

 On April 29, 2015, defendant filed the administrative record and an answer to the 

complaint. ECF Nos. 12, 13.1 Pursuant to the court’s scheduling order, plaintiff was required to 

file a motion for summary judgment and/or remand within 45 days of the date the administrative 

record was served or, in this instance, by June 13, 2015. ECF No. 5 at 2. As of the date of this 

order, plaintiff has not filed her motion for summary judgment. Accordingly, plaintiff shall show 

cause why sanctions should not be imposed for her failure to comply with the court’s scheduling 

order. See E.D. Cal. L.R. 110 (providing that failure to comply with any court order “may be 

grounds for imposition by the Court of any and all sanctions authorized by statute or Rule or 

within the inherent power of the Court.”); E.D. Cal. L.R. 183 (providing that parties appearing 

 1

 This case is before the undersigned pursuant to the consent of the parties. ECF Nos. 9, 

16; see 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). 

Case 2:14-cv-02813-EFB Document 17 Filed 10/07/15 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2

pro se are “bound by the Federal Rules of Civil or Criminal Procedure,” as well as the Local 

Rules). 

 Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that: 

 1. Plaintiff shall show cause, in writing, no later than October 21, 2015, why sanctions 

should not be imposed for failure to timely file a motion for summary judgment. 

 2. Plaintiff shall file her motion for summary judgment no later than October 21, 2015. 

 3. Plaintiff is admonished that failure to comply with this order will result in dismissal of 

this action for lack of prosecution and/or failure to comply with court orders. 

DATED: October 7, 2015. 

Case 2:14-cv-02813-EFB Document 17 Filed 10/07/15 Page 2 of 2