Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-09-08191/USCOURTS-ca4-09-08191-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Ivan Magdaleno
Appellant
United States of America
Appellee

Document Text:

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-8191

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

IVAN MAGDALENO,

Defendant – Appellant.

No. 10-6254

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

IVAN MAGDALENO,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the District 

of South Carolina, at Spartanburg. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., 

Senior District Judge. (7:06-cr-00703-GRA-2)

Submitted: March 30, 2010 Decided: April 5, 2010

Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Appeal: 09-8191 Doc: 8 Filed: 04/05/2010 Pg: 1 of 3
2

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ivan Magdaleno, Appellant Pro Se. Jimmie Ewing, Assistant 

United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 09-8191 Doc: 8 Filed: 04/05/2010 Pg: 2 of 3
3

PER CURIAM:

Ivan Magdaleno appeals the district court’s orders

denying his motion for specific performance of his plea 

agreement pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 35(b),

his motion for reconsideration of that denial, and his motion to 

reopen the case. We have reviewed the record and find no 

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated 

by the district court. United States v. Magdaleno, No. 7:06-cr00703-GRA-2 (D.S.C. Nov. 9, 2009; Nov. 25, 2009; Jan. 26, 2010). 

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Appeal: 09-8191 Doc: 8 Filed: 04/05/2010 Pg: 3 of 3