Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-15-02298/USCOURTS-ca4-15-02298-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Baltimore County

Baltimore County Public Schools
Appellee
Lawrence Diggs
Appellant
Kevin Kamenetz

Document Text:

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-2298

LAWRENCE DIGGS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

BALTIMORE COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS,

Defendant – Appellee,

and

BALTIMORE COUNTY; KEVIN KAMENETZ,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge. 

(1:14-cv-00715-RDB)

Submitted: May 19, 2016 Decided: June 13, 2016

Before AGEE, KEENAN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Lawrence Diggs, Appellant Pro Se. Edmund J. O’Meally, Andrew G.

Scott, PESSIN KATZ LAW, P.A., Towson, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 15-2298 Doc: 17 Filed: 06/13/2016 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Lawrence Diggs appeals the district court’s order granting 

Baltimore County Public Schools’ motion for summary judgment and 

closing his civil action that raised claims of employment 

discrimination, hostile work environment, and retaliation under 

Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 

2000e-17 (2012), and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 

1967, 29 U.S.C. §§ 621-634 (2012). We have reviewed the record 

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the 

reasons stated by the district court. See Diggs v. Bd. of Educ. 

of Baltimore Cty., No. 1:14-cv-00715-RDB (D. Md. Sept. 23, 

2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

AFFIRMED

Appeal: 15-2298 Doc: 17 Filed: 06/13/2016 Pg: 2 of 2