Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-00733/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-00733-2/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Roxanne Ari
Petitioner
Deborah L. Patrick
Respondent

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ROXANNE ARI, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

)

v. )

)

)

DEBORAH L. PATRICK, )

)

Respondent. )

 )

1:07-cv-00733-LJO-TAG HC 

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATION

(Doc. 7)

ORDER DISMISSING PETITION FOR WRIT

OF HABEAS CORPUS

(Doc. 1)

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO

ENTER JUDGMENT

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO

SEND PETITIONER FORM FOR FILING

CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. 

On June 27, 2007, the Magistrate Judge assigned to the case filed a Findings and

Recommendation recommending that the petition for writ of habeas corpus be DISMISSED because

Petitioner did not challenge the fact of her confinement or the execution of her sentence but instead

challenged the conditions of her confinement. (Doc. 7). The Findings and Recommendation was

served on all parties and contained notice that any objections were to be filed within twenty days

Case 1:07-cv-00733-LJO-TAG Document 9 Filed 11/28/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

from the date of service of that order. On July 23, 2007, Petitioner filed objections to the Magistrate

Judge's Findings and Recommendation. (Doc. 8). 

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a de

novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, including Petitioner's objections,

the Court concludes that the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation is supported by the

record and proper analysis. Petitioner's objections present no grounds for questioning the Magistrate

Judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendation issued June 27, 2007 (Doc. 7), is ADOPTED IN

FULL; 

2. The petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. 1) is DISMISSED; 

3. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to ENTER JUDGMENT for Respondent and close the

file; and,

4. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to send Petitioner a form for filing a claim pursuant

to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.

This order terminates the action in its entirety.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: November 28, 2007 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill 

b9ed48 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:07-cv-00733-LJO-TAG Document 9 Filed 11/28/07 Page 2 of 2