Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_13-cv-01905/USCOURTS-caed-2_13-cv-01905-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Aerotek, Inc.,
Defendant
Shirley Konkle
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 STIPULATION AND ORDER TO DISMISS ACTION PURSUANT TO RULE 41(A) OF THE FEDERAL RULES 

OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 

BENJAMIN L. WEBSTER, Bar No. 132230

KELSEY E. PAPST, Bar No. 270547 

LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. 

500 Capitol Mall 

Suite 2000 

Sacramento, CA 95814 

Telephone: 916.830.7200 

Fax No.: 916.561.0828 

Attorneys for Defendant 

AEROTEK, INC., A MARYLAND 

CORPORATION 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SHIRLEY KONKLE, an individual,

Plaintiff, 

v. 

AEROTEK, INC., a Maryland 

Corporation, 

Defendant. 

Case No. 2:13-CV-01905-MCE-DAD

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO DISMISS 

ACTION PURSUANT TO RULE 41(A) OF 

THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL 

PROCEDURE 

Plaintiff SHIRLEY KONKLE (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant AEROTEK, INC., a 

Maryland Corporation (“Defendant”) (collectively, the “Parties”), by and through their counsel, do 

hereby stipulate and agree as follows: 

WHEREAS, on July 16, 2013, Plaintiff filed the Complaint in the above-captioned 

matter against Defendant in the Superior Court of California for the County of Sacramento, Case No. 

34-2013-00148247; and 

WHEREAS, on September 13, 2013, Defendant removed this action to the United 

States District Court for the Eastern District of California, Case No. 2:13-cv-01905-MCE-DAD, 

pursuant to diversity jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1332; and 

WHEREAS, the Parties have entered into a Confidential Settlement Agreement and 

Release of All Claims, effectuating a resolution of this dispute; and 

WHEREAS, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a), the Parties agree that 

Case 2:13-cv-01905-MCE-DAD Document 13 Filed 10/23/15 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2.

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO DISMISS ACTION PURSUANT TO RULE 41(A) OF THE FEDERAL RULES 

OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 

this case can and should be dismissed, with prejudice. 

THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED that the abovecaptioned matter shall be dismissed, with prejudice. Defendant shall bear its own fees and costs in 

connection with the proceedings before this Court, and Plaintiff shall bear her own fees and costs in 

connection with the proceedings before this Court. 

SO STIPULATED. 

Dated: October 21, 2015 LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. 

/s/ Benjamin L. Webster BENJAMIN L. WEBSTER 

KELSEY E. PAPST 

Attorneys for Defendant 

AEROTEK, INC., A MARYLAND 

CORPORATION 

Dated: October 21, 2015 KUNZLER LAW GROUP 

/s/ R. Jeremy Adamson 

R. JEREMY ADAMSON 

Attorney for Plaintiff 

SHIRLEY KONKLE 

ORDER

 Pursuant to the foregoing stipulation and Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice. 

 IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: October 22, 2015 

Case 2:13-cv-01905-MCE-DAD Document 13 Filed 10/23/15 Page 2 of 2