Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_10-cv-02310/USCOURTS-cand-3_10-cv-02310-2/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Caffe Amici Espresso, LLC
Defendant
United States of America
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

JOSEPH RUSSONIELLO 

United States Attorney

THOMAS MOORE 

Assistant United States Attorney

Chief, Tax Division

THOMAS M. NEWMAN (NYSBN 4256178)

Assistant United States Attorney

 9th Floor Federal Building

 450 Golden Gate Avenue, Box 36055

 San Francisco, California 94102

 Telephone: (415) 436-6888

 Email: thomas.newman2@usdoj.gov

Attorneys for the United States of America

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

Plaintiff, 

v.

CAFFE AMICI ESPRESSO, LLC, 

Defendant.

 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 10-cv-2310-WHA

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE

MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 

The parties stipulate as follows:

1. This case was filed by plaintiffs to reduce specified tax assessments to judgment

and enjoin the defendant from failing to file employment tax returns, unemployment tax returns,

and pay employment taxes to the IRS.

2. The Court set a Case Management Conference for September 2, 2010, and, in an

Order dated August 9, 2010, the Court stated that a Case Management Conference may be

appropriate on August 26, 2010, in place of a noticed hearing.

3. On August 9, 2010, Plaintiff filed a response to a Court’s Order, which stated that

default should be set aside and requested that the two pending motions be withdrawn. Plaintiff

agreed that setting aside default made the motion for default judgment procedurally moot. 

4. The parties respectfully request that the Initial Case Management Conference be

Case No. 10-cv-2310-WHA

Stipulation

Case 3:10-cv-02310-WHA Document 22 Filed 08/17/10 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

continued until September 16, 2010 for several reasons. First, plaintiff’s counsel has been

unavailable to meet and confer with defendant’s counsel about how to proceed in this case since

the Answer has been filed. The parties only briefly conferred regarding a continued date for the

Case Management Conference. Second, the parties believe more time is needed, given the

change in the status of the case, to make initial disclosures, and confer regarding a schedule. The

parties also believe this additional two weeks may be beneficial in order to discuss a resolution

of this matter, which cannot be accomplished under the present schedule.

5. For these reasons, the parties request a two-week continuance of the September 2,

2010 Case Management Conference until September 16, 2010. 

Dated August 11, 2010 JOSEPH P. RUSSONIELLO 

United States Attorney

/s/ Thomas M. Newman

THOMAS M. NEWMAN

Assistant United States Attorney

Tax Division

Dated August 11, 2010 /s/ James Cois

Attorney for Defendant

Caffe Amici Espresso

Case No. 10-cv-2310-WHA

Stipulation

Case 3:10-cv-02310-WHA Document 22 Filed 08/17/10 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

Plaintiff, 

v.

CAFFE AMICI ESPRESSO, LLC, 

Defendant.

 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 10-cv-2310-WHA

[proposed] ORDER

 

In accordance with the parties’ stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED.

THUS DONE AND SIGNED on this _____ day of __________, 2010 at San Francisco,

California.

 ________________________________

WILLIAM H. ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case No. 10-cv-2310-WHA

ORDER 

17th August

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

APPROVED

Judge William Alsup

Case 3:10-cv-02310-WHA Document 22 Filed 08/17/10 Page 3 of 3