Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-16-06841/USCOURTS-ca4-16-06841-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Matthew James Dury
Appellant
United States of America
Appellee

Document Text:

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-6758

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

MATTHEW JAMES DURY,

Defendant - Appellant.

No. 16-6841

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

MATTHEW JAMES DURY,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Martin K. Reidinger, 

District Judge. (1:08-cr-00016-MR-1)

Submitted: October 20, 2016 Decided: November 4, 2016

Before SHEDD and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Appeal: 16-6841 Doc: 6 Filed: 11/04/2016 Pg: 1 of 3
2

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Matthew James Dury, Appellant Pro Se. Donald David Gast, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 16-6841 Doc: 6 Filed: 11/04/2016 Pg: 2 of 3
3

PER CURIAM:

Matthew James Dury appeals the district court’s orders

denying relief on his post-judgment motions to dismiss 

indictment, for a new trial and for recusal. We have reviewed 

the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm 

for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. 

Dury, No. 1:08-cr-00016-MR-1 (W.D.N.C. May 13, 2016; June 7, 

2016). We deny Dury’s motion for default judgment and dispense 

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Appeal: 16-6841 Doc: 6 Filed: 11/04/2016 Pg: 3 of 3