Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_10-cv-04856/USCOURTS-cand-3_10-cv-04856-2/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Fair Housing of Marin
Plaintiff
Jean Paul Jurdo
Defendant
Robert Scott Thomas
Defendant

Document Text:

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Craig S. Miller (State Bar No. 139682) 

William S. Weisberg (State Bar No. 146284) 

WEISBERG & MILLER 

654 Sacramento Street, Third Floor 

San Francisco, California 94111 

Telephone: (415) 296-7070 

Facsimile: (415) 296-7060 

cmiller(@ wmlawfirm.com 

wweisberg(5) wmlawfirm.com 

Attorneys for ROBERT SCOTT THOMAS, as Trustee of the Thomas 

Family Trust- Exemption Trust, and the Thomas Family TrustSurvivor's Trust 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

FAIR HOUSING OF MARIN, a California not 

for profit corporation, 

Plaintiff 

ROBERT SCOTT THOMAS, as Trustee of the 

Thomas Family Trust- Exemption Trust, and the 

Thomas Family Trust- Survivor's Trust; and 

JEAN PAUL JURDO, 

Defendants. 

CaseNo.:CV10-4856EMC 

STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF 

TIME TO RESPOND, and EXTENSION 

OF STANDING ORDER DUE DATES 

The parties, FAIR HOUSING OF MARIN, a California not for profit corporation (Plaintiff) 

and ROBERT SCOTT THOMAS, as Trustee of the Thomas Family Trust- Exemption Trust, and the 

Thomas Family Trust- Survivor's Trust (Defendant Thomas), by and through their counsel, hereby 

stipulate that Defendant Thomas shall have an extension of time through and including January 31, 

2011, to respond to the COMPLAINT FOR MONETARY, DECLARATORY, AND INJUNCTIVE 

RELIEF filed on October 26, 2010 in these proceedings. 

Although there have been two prior stipulations extending time for Defendant Thomas to 

respond, Defendant Thomas has new counsel, is exploring insurance coverage, and is actively 

negotiating with Plaintiff to reach an early settlement of this matter. Fees that Defendant Thomas does 

STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND. 

; ORDER

Case 3:10-cv-04856-EMC Document 13 Filed 01/06/11 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

not incur in responding can be put towards settlement. The parties believe there is a strong possibility 

of settlement as their current positions are not that far apart. Accordingly, they request the Court to 

approve this stipulation and to continue all dates in the Court's standing order by an equal period of 

time—three weeks. 

Dated: Jan. 5_, 201: 

Dated: Jan. ,2011 

IT IS SO ORDERED: 

Edward M. Chen 

U.S. Magistrate Judge 

BRANCART & BRANCART 

Liza Cristol-Deman 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

WEISBERG & MILLER 

William S. Weisberg, co-counsel for Defendant 

ROBERT SCOTT THOMAS, with Christina Gallagher 

Nelson of GREENE RADOVSKY MALONEY SHARE 

& HENNIGH LLP, for Defendant ROBERT SCOTT 

THOMAS, as Trustee of the Thomas Family TrustExemption Trust, and the Thomas Family TrustSurvivor's Trust 

STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND. 

The case management conference is reset from 2/2/11 to 3/2/11 at 1:30 

p.m. A joint case management conference statement is due on 2/23/11. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

AS MODIFIED

Judge Edward M. Chen

Case 3:10-cv-04856-EMC Document 13 Filed 01/06/11 Page 2 of 2