Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-00277/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-00277-7/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Arnold Schwarzenegger
Respondent
Roderick Washington
Petitioner

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

U.S. District Court

 E. D. California 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RODERICK WASHINGTON, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

v. )

)

ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, )

)

Respondent. )

____________________________________)

1:07-CV-00277 LJO SMS HC 

ORDER STRIKING PETITIONER’S

MOTION TO VACATE JUDGMENT

[Doc. #29]

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus 

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. 

On March 16, 2007, the Magistrate Judge issued a Findings and Recommendation that

recommended the petition be dismissed with prejudice for failure to state a cognizable claim for

relief. On April 11, 2007, the undersigned adopted the Findings and Recommendation in full,

dismissed the case with prejudice, and directed that judgment be entered. The Clerk of Court entered

judgment on the same date.

On April 19, 2007, Petitioner filed a motion to vacate judgment. On April 26, 2007, the

undersigned denied said motion to vacate judgment. On April 27, 2007, Petitioner filed a second

motion to vacate judgment. That motion was denied on May 8, 2007.

On May 4 and 17, 2007, Petitioner filed notices of appeal to the Ninth Circuit Court of

Case 1:07-cv-00277-LJO -SMS Document 30 Filed 12/19/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

U.S. District Court

 E. D. California 2

Appeals. On August 1, 2007, the Ninth Circuit denied the appeal.

Now, on December 13, 2007, Petitioner presents a third motion to vacate judgment.

Petitioner is advised that the Court has considered his arguments on those several prior occasions

listed above. The Ninth Circuit has also considered his arguments and rejected them. Petitioner is

advised that this case is closed and no further filings will be permitted within. 

Accordingly, Petitioner’s Motion to Vacate Judgment is hereby STRICKEN.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: December 19, 2007 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill 

b9ed48 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:07-cv-00277-LJO -SMS Document 30 Filed 12/19/07 Page 2 of 2