Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-07-07361/USCOURTS-ca4-07-07361-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Janet Bunts
Appellee
Mark Dib
Appellee
Karen Lambright
Appellee
Salvatore Lanase
Appellee
E. Mace
Appellee
Ronnie Mullins
Appellant
Richard Ramirez
Appellee
United States of America
Appellee

Document Text:

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

 No. 07-7361 

RONNIE MULLINS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; RICHARD RAMIREZ; E.

MACE; MARK DIB; SALVATORE LANASE; KAREN

LAMBRIGHT; JANET BUNTS,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern

District of West Virginia, at Clarksburg. Irene M. Keeley, Chief

District Judge. (1:06-cv-00105)

Submitted: January 17, 2008 Decided: January 25, 2008

Before TRAXLER, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ronnie Mullins, Appellant Pro Se. Daniel W. Dickinson, Jr., OFFICE

OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Wheeling, West Virginia; William

Eugene Galeota, STEPTOE & JOHNSON, Morgantown, West Virginia, for

Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 07-7361 Doc: 19-2 Filed: 01/25/2008 Pg: 1 of 2
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Ronnie Mullins appeals the district court’s order

adopting the report of the magistrate judge and denying relief on

Mullins’ complaint asserting deliberate indifference to medical

needs and medical negligence pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown

Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971), and

the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 2671-2680 (2000). We

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. Mullins v. United States, No. 1:06-cv-00105 (N.D.W. Va.

Aug. 30, 2007). We deny Mullins’ motion for leave to proceed on

appeal in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Appeal: 07-7361 Doc: 19-2 Filed: 01/25/2008 Pg: 2 of 2