Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-00486/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-00486-3/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Anthony Jones
Petitioner
Kern Valley State Prison
Respondent

Document Text:

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

ANTHONY JONES, 

Petitioner, 

v. 

WARDEN, KERN VALLEY STATE 

PRISON, 

Respondent. 

No. 2:14-cv-0486 JAM GGH P 

ORDER AND FINDINGS AND 

RECOMMENDATIONS 

 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se with an amended petition for a writ of habeas 

corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. 

By order of November 3, 3012, petitioner was directed to file the pages missing from his 

amended petition (ECF No. 15) within twenty-one days. Petitioner has not responded to that 

order. Since the missing pages pertain to Ground Four of the amended petition, that claim will be 

dismissed on findings and recommendations and the amended petition will proceed with Claims 

One through Three only. 

Since petitioner may be entitled to relief if the claimed violation of constitutional rights is 

proved, respondent will be directed to file a response to Claims One through Three only of 

petitioner’s amended petition. 

 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that: Claim Four of the amended 

petition be dismissed with prejudice. 

Case 2:14-cv-00486-JAM-GGH Document 17 Filed 01/15/15 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2

These findings and recommendations will be submitted to the United States District Judge 

assigned to this case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 

after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written 

objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned 

“Objections to Findings and Recommendations.” Any response to the objections shall be filed 

and served within fourteen days after service of the objections. The parties are advised that 

failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District 

Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 

 IT IS ORDERED that: 

 1. Respondent is directed to file a response to petitioner’s amended habeas petition within 

sixty days from the date of this order. See Rule 4, 28 U.S.C. foll. § 2254. An answer shall be 

accompanied by all transcripts and other documents relevant to the issues presented in the 

petition. See Rule 5, 28 U.S.C. foll. § 2254; 

 2. If the response to the amended habeas petition is an answer, petitioner’s reply, if any, 

shall be filed and served within thirty days after service of the answer; 

 3. If the response to the amended habeas petition is a motion, petitioner’s opposition or 

statement of non-opposition to the motion shall be filed and served within thirty days after service 

of the motion, and respondent’s reply, if any, shall be filed and served within fourteen days 

thereafter; and 

 4. The Clerk of the Court shall serve a copy of this order, the form Consent to Proceed 

Before a United States Magistrate Judge, and a copy of the petition for writ of habeas corpus 

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 on Michael Patrick Farrell, Senior Assistant Attorney General. 

Dated: January 15, 2015 

 /s/ Gregory G. Hollows 

 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

 

GGH:076 

jone0486.100 

Case 2:14-cv-00486-JAM-GGH Document 17 Filed 01/15/15 Page 2 of 2