Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-00923/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-00923-7/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
George Galaza
Respondent
Demond Maurice Mimms
Petitioner

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DEMOND MAURICE MIMMS,

Petitioner,

 v.

GEORGE GALAZA,

Respondent.

____________________________________/

1:06-cv-00923-AWI-WMW-(HC)

ORDER REQUIRING PETITIONER TO 

INFORM THE COURT WHETHER HE WILL

CONSENT TO JURISDICTION 

OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a habeas corpus action pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

§ 2254. On July 21, 2006, the Clerk of the Court mailed a consent/decline form to petitioner, with

information and instructions for informing the Court whether he would consent to Magistrate Judge

jurisdiction. Petitioner has not returned the consent/decline form. 

Accordingly, petitioner is ORDERED to tell the Court whether he will consent to Magistrate

Judge Jurisdiction. Petitioner must complete and return the consent/decline formwithin thirty (30) days.

Failure to follow this order will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed pursuant to

Local Rule 11-110.

The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to send to petitioner another copy of the consent/decline

form and the instructions for consent to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 4, 2008 /s/ William M. Wunderlich 

bl0dc4 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-00923-VRW Document 28 Filed 03/05/08 Page 1 of 1