Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-arwd-2_06-cv-02050/USCOURTS-arwd-2_06-cv-02050-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Danny Lee Baker
Defendant
Edward Smalley
Defendant
George Allan West
Plaintiff

Document Text:

AO72A

(Rev. 8/82)

-1-

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS

FORT SMITH DIVISION

GEORGE ALLAN WEST PLAINTIFF

v. Civil No. 06-2050

DANNY LEE BAKER; and

EDWARD SMALLEY DEFENDANTS

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE

George Allan West filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on May 2,

2006. He proceeds pro se and in forma pauperis.

On August 25, 2006, the defendants filed a motion for summary judgment (Doc. 14). On

October 17, 2006, the plaintiff responded to the motion for summary judgment (Doc. 16). 

On November 30, 2006, West filed a motion to dismiss the case (Doc. 18). He indicates

he no longer desires to proceed with the case. I recommend that the motion to dismiss be granted

and this action be dismissed with prejudice.

The parties have ten days from receipt of the report and recommendation in which

to file written objections pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). The failure to file timely

objections may result in waiver of the right to appeal questions of fact. The parties are

reminded that objections must be both timely and specific to trigger de novo review by the

district court.

DATED this 13th day of December 2006.

/s/ Beverly Stites Jones 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-02050-RTD Document 19 Filed 12/13/06 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: <pageID>