Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_16-cv-01298/USCOURTS-cand-4_16-cv-01298-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Albert Lavoy Adams
Plaintiff
Corizon Medical
Defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ALBERT LAVOY ADAMS,

Plaintiff,

v.

CORIZON MEDICAL,

Defendant.

Case No. 16-cv-01298-DMR (PR)

ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT 

PREJUDICE

Plaintiff filed the present pro se prisoner complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On April 8, 

2016, mail directed to Plaintiff was returned to the Clerk of the Court with a notation that it was 

undeliverable because Plaintiff was “not in custody.” Dkt. 5. On May 6, 2016, mail directed to 

Plaintiff was once again returned to the Clerk as undeliverable. Dkt. 6. To date, Plaintiff has not 

updated his address with the Court or submitted any further pleadings in this case. 

Plaintiff has consented to magistrate judge jurisdiction, and this matter has been assigned 

to the undersigned Magistrate Judge. Dkt. 1 at 4.

Pursuant to Northern District Local Rule 3-11 a party proceeding pro se whose address 

changes while an action is pending must promptly file a notice of change of address specifying the 

new address. See L.R. 3-11(a). The Court may dismiss without prejudice a complaint when: 

(1) mail directed to the pro se party by the Court has been returned to the Court as not deliverable, 

and (2) the Court fails to receive within sixty days of this return a written communication from the 

pro se party indicating a current address. See L.R. 3-11(b). 

More than sixty days have passed since the mail directed to Plaintiff by the Court was 

returned as undeliverable. The Court has not received a notice from Plaintiff of a new address. 

Case 4:16-cv-01298-DMR Document 7 Filed 06/08/16 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

Accordingly, the complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to Rule 3-11 of the 

Northern District Local Rules. The Clerk shall enter judgment, terminate all pending motions, and 

close the file.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: 6/8/2016

______________________________________

DONNA M. RYU

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 4:16-cv-01298-DMR Document 7 Filed 06/08/16 Page 2 of 2