Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_09-cv-01147/USCOURTS-cand-3_09-cv-01147-5/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Gregory Bender
Plaintiff
Broadcom Corporation
Defendant

Document Text:

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CASE NO. 3:09-CV-1147 (MHP) 

DARIN W. SNYDER (State Bar #136003), dsnyder@omm.com 

ANNE E. HUFFSMITH (State Bar #236438), ahuffsmith@omm.com 

O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP 

Two Embarcadero Center, 28th Floor 

San Francisco, California 94111-3823 

Telephone: (415) 984-8700 

Facsimile: (415) 984-8701 

Attorneys for Defendant 

BROADCOM CORPORATION 

David N. Kuhn (State Bar #73389) 

Attorney-at-Law 

144 Hagar Avenue 

Piedmont, CA 94611 

Telephone: (510) 653-4983 

E-mail: dnkuhn@pacbell.net 

Attorney for Plaintiff 

GREGORY BENDER 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

GREGORY BENDER, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

BROADCOM CORPORATION, 

Defendant. 

Case No. 3:09-cv-1147 (MHP) 

CIVIL LOCAL RULE 6-2(a) 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER 

 

WHEREAS Plaintiff Gregory Bender served his revised Patent Local Rule 3-1 

infringement contentions on February 1, 2010; 

WHEREAS Defendant Broadcom Corporation contests the sufficiency of Bender’s 

infringement contentions; 

WHEREAS Broadcom and Bender need additional time to meet and confer regarding 

Broadcom’s objections to Bender’s infringement contentions; 

Case 3:09-cv-01147-MHP Document 39 Filed 02/11/10 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER - 2 - CASE NO. 3:09-CV-1147 (MHP) 

WHEREAS Broadcom’s Patent Local Rule 3-3 and 3-4 disclosures and response to 

Bender’s complaint are currently due on February 18, 2010; 

THEREFORE, pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-2(a), the parties hereby STIPULATE and 

AGREE that the deadline for Broadcom to serve its Patent Local Rule 3-3 and 3-4 disclosures and 

to respond to Bender’s complaint shall be extended by 49 days, until April 8, 2010, to allow the 

parties additional time to resolve their disagreement regarding the sufficiency of Bender’s 

infringement contentions and to allow Broadcom sufficient time to file and have heard a motion 

to compel Rule 3-1 compliant infringement contentions if necessary. The Patent Local Rule 4-1, 

4-2, 4-3, and 4-4 deadlines will follow from the modified Patent Local Rule 3-3 and 3-4 deadline. 

The declaration required by Civil Local Rule 6-2(a) is attached. (See Huffsmith Declaration.) 

Dated: February 10, 2010 

Respectfully submitted, 

By: /s/ Darin W. Snyder 

Darin W. Snyder 

O’Melveny & Myers LLP 

Counsel for Defendant 

BROADCOM CORPORATION 

Dated: February 10, 2010 By: /s/ David N. Kuhn 

David N. Kuhn 

Attorney-at-Law 

Counsel for Plaintiff 

GREGORY BENDER 

Pursuant to General Order No. 45 X(B), I hereby attest that concurrence in the filing of 

this document has been obtained from each of the above-listed signatories. 

Dated: February 10, 2010 

Respectfully submitted, 

By: /s/ Anne E. Huffsmith

Anne E. Huffsmith 

O’Melveny & Myers LLP 

Counsel for Defendant 

BROADCOM CORPORATION 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION IT IS SO ORDERED: 

Dated: _________________________ _____________________________________ 

 The Honorable Marilyn Hall Patel 

 United States District Judge 

2/11/2010

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Marilyn H. Patel

Case 3:09-cv-01147-MHP Document 39 Filed 02/11/10 Page 2 of 2