Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_04-cv-02550/USCOURTS-azd-2_04-cv-02550-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Joel Guzman-Lopez
Plaintiff
United States of America
Defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

United States of America,

Plaintiff - Respondent, 

vs.

Joel Guzman-Lopez, 

Defendant - Movant. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CR 03-856-PHX-JAT

CV 04-2550-PHX-JAT (ECV)

ORDER

This Court “may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or

recommendations made by the magistrate judge.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). It is “clear that the

district judge must review the magistrate judge’s findings and recommendations de novo if

objection is made, but not otherwise.” United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121

(9th Cir. 2003) (en banc) (emphasis in original); Schmidt v. Johnstone, 263 F.Supp.2d 1219,

1126 (D.Ariz. 2003) (“Following Reyna-Tapia, this Court concludes that de novo review of

factual and legal issues is required if objections are made, ‘but not otherwise.’”). District

courts are not required to conduct “any review at all . . . of any issue that is not the subject

of an objection.” Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985) (emphasis added); see also 28

U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (“the court shall make a de novo determination of those portions of the

[report and recommendation] to which objection is made.”).

Case 2:04-cv-02550-JAT Document 1 Filed 12/08/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

In this case, the Report and Recommendation was issued on October 21, 2005.

Defendant/Movant has not filed any objections to the Report and Recommendation. Based

on the foregoing,

IT IS ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (Doc. #26) is accepted and

adopted; the Motion to vacate/set aside sentence (Doc. #22) is denied, and the Clerk of the

Court shall enter judgment accordingly.

DATED this 7th day of December, 2005.

Case 2:04-cv-02550-JAT Document 1 Filed 12/08/05 Page 2 of 2