Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca8-14-02119/USCOURTS-ca8-14-02119-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Penny L. Barton
Appellant
Carolyn W. Colvin
Appellee

Document Text:

United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 14-2119

___________________________

Penny L. Barton

lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant

v.

Carolyn W. Colvin, Acting Commissioner, Social Security Administration

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee

____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the Western District of Missouri - Kansas City

____________

 Submitted: January 6, 2015

Filed: January 14, 2015

[Unpublished]

____________

Before WOLLMAN, BYE, and MELLOY, Circuit Judges. 

____________

PER CURIAM.

Appellate Case: 14-2119 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/14/2015 Entry ID: 4234255 
Penny L. Barton appeals the district court’s order affirming the denial of 1

disability insurance benefits. For reversal, Barton argues that the administrative law

judge (ALJ) erred (1) in assessing her residual functional capacity, and in failing to

assign appropriate weight to the findings of her treating and examining physicians

and other medical sources; (2) in finding that she was capable of performing her past

relevant work, and other work identified by a vocational expert; and (3) in failing to

consider all of the evidence in the record, including the observations of and

information provided by third parties. Following a careful and thorough review of

the record, we conclude that the ALJ’s determination is supported by substantial

evidence on the record as a whole, that Barton’s arguments do not support reversal,

and that an extended discussion is not warranted. Accordingly, we affirm the district

court’s judgment. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________

The Honorable Matt Jeffrey Whitworth, United States Magistrate Judge for

1

the Western District of Missouri, to whom the case was referred for final disposition

by consent of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).

-2-

Appellate Case: 14-2119 Page: 2 Date Filed: 01/14/2015 Entry ID: 4234255