Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-10-01152/USCOURTS-ca4-10-01152-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Paul Lanteigne
Appellee
Joshua Barrett Shapiro
Appellant

Document Text:

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-1152

JOSHUA BARRETT SHAPIRO,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

PAUL LANTEIGNE,

Defendant – Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Mark S. Davis, District 

Judge. (2:09-cv-00339-MSD-FBS)

Submitted: July 22, 2010 Decided: July 29, 2010

Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Joshua Barrett Shapiro, Appellant Pro Se. Jeff W. Rosen, PENDER 

& COWARD, PC, Virginia Beach, Virginia, for Appellee. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 10-1152 Doc: 10 Filed: 07/29/2010 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Joshua Barrett Shapiro appeals the district court’s 

order granting the Defendant’s motion for summary judgment and 

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We 

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district 

court. See Shapiro v. Lanteigne, No. 2:09-cv-00339-MSD-FBS 

(E.D. Va. Jan. 22, 2010). We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented 

in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Appeal: 10-1152 Doc: 10 Filed: 07/29/2010 Pg: 2 of 2