Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-05752/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-05752-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
D. Adams
Respondent
Clayton Jessup
Petitioner

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

U.S. District Court

 E. D. California cd 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CLAYTON JESSUP, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

)

v. )

)

)

D. ADAMS, Warden, )

)

Respondent. )

 )

1:04-CV-05752 OWW LJO HC

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND 

RECOMMENDATION 

[Doc. #14]

ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT

OF HABEAS CORPUS

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT

TO ENTER JUDGMENT 

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. 

On August 31, 2006, the Magistrate Judge issued a Findings and Recommendation that

recommended the petition for writ of habeas corpus be DENIED with prejudice and the Clerk of

Court be DIRECTED to enter judgment. This Findings and Recommendation was served on all

parties and contained notice that any objections to the Findings and Recommendation were to be

filed within ten (10) days of the date of service of the order. Over ten (10) days have passed and no

party has filed objections. The Court notes, however, that the Findings and Recommendation served

on Petitioner was returned by the U.S. Postal Service as undeliverable.

Case 1:04-cv-05752-OWW -LJO Document 17 Filed 10/11/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

U.S. District Court

 E. D. California cd 2

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a de

novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds that the Findings

and Recommendation is supported by the record and proper analysis. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendation issued August 31, 2006, is ADOPTED IN FULL; 

2. The petition for writ of habeas corpus is DENIED with prejudice; and

3. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to enter judgment.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 10, 2006 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger 

emm0d6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:04-cv-05752-OWW -LJO Document 17 Filed 10/11/06 Page 2 of 2