Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-01781/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-01781-8/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
1.41 Acres of Land
Defendant
East Bay Regional Park District
Defendant
The State of California
Defendant
United States of America
Plaintiff

Document Text:

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

 v.

1.41 ACRES OF LAND, more or less, situated

in the City of Alameda, Alameda County, State

of California, and THE STATE OF

CALIFORNIA, acting by and through its

Department of Parks and Recreation, and the

EAST BAY REGIONAL PARK DISTRICT,

Defendants. /

No. C 14-01781 WHA

REQUEST FOR SUBMISSION

The United States has filed a motion for partial summary judgment, set for a hearing in

April 2015. It would be helpful if the parties could please file a joint statement (printed in color

with exhibit tabs), appending the following items, by MARCH 24 AT NOON:

1. A map in color with labels for the various items in play (i.e., Alameda Federal

Center, vacant parcel, Crown Beach, McKay Avenue, Neptune Pointe). Please clearly highlight

(or denote) the boundaries of the property to be condemned (that is, the portion of McKay

Avenue at issue here). The Court sees the maps provided by the United States at Dkt. Nos. 56 at

9 (color), 56-3 at 39 (color), 56-3 at 57 (black-and-white), 57-1 at 32 (black-and-white), and 1 at

6–7 (black-and-white) but it would be helpful to have one (or two) agreed-upon maps that best

represent the property at issue. Please print this agreed-upon map on a large posterboard and

bring it to the April 2015 hearing. 

2. An authenticated copy of the quitclaim deed recorded in 1961.

3. An authenticated copy of the operating agreement between East Bay Regional

Park District and the State of California for Crown Beach and McKay Avenue.

Case 3:14-cv-01781-WHA Document 70 Filed 03/09/15 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

4. An authenticated copy of the General Services Administration’s “invitation for

bids” in its online auction to sell Neptune Pointe in 2011.

5. A copy of the proposal submitted to the Office of Management and Budget under

the Relocation Program referenced in the declaration of Clark Van Epps (Dkt. No. 56-3, 

Van Epps Decl. ¶¶ 3–4).

6. The emails appended to the declaration of Charlene Larson (Dkt. No. 56-2, 

Larson Exhs. A, B) appear to be in response to “emails of October 31, 2008 and 

November 4, 2008” and an “email of November 10, 2008.” Do we have those emails? If so,

please include a copy of those emails.

Dated: March 9, 2015. 

WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:14-cv-01781-WHA Document 70 Filed 03/09/15 Page 2 of 2