Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-15-06606/USCOURTS-ca4-15-06606-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Terry Douglas Campbell
Appellant
Michael Christopher Folk
Appellee
Kennith Hammett
Appellee
Ingles Market
Appellee
Travis Todd King
Appellee
John Allen Putman

Nathaniel Mark Rainey
Appellee
Sptg Co Sheriffs Dept

Document Text:

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-6606

TERRY DOUGLAS CAMPBELL,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

INGLES MARKET, Ingles Store 92; MICHAEL CHRISTOPHER FOLK; 

TRAVIS TODD KING; KENNITH HAMMETT; NATHANIEL MARK RAINEY,

Defendants – Appellees,

and

SPTG CO SHERIFFS DEPT; JOHN ALLEN PUTMAN,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Spartanburg. Bruce H. Hendricks, District 

Judge. (7:13-cv-01701-BHH)

Submitted: August 20, 2015 Decided: August 25, 2015

Before DUNCAN, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Terry Douglas Campbell, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Miller Snyder, 

CLARKSON WALSH TERRELL & COULTER, PA, Greenville, South 

Carolina; James Adam Russell, Wilson Scarborough Sheldon,

Appeal: 15-6606 Doc: 37 Filed: 08/25/2015 Pg: 1 of 3
2

WILLSON JONES CARTER & BAXLEY, P.A., Greenville, South Carolina, 

for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 15-6606 Doc: 37 Filed: 08/25/2015 Pg: 2 of 3
3

PER CURIAM:

Terry Douglas Campbell appeals the district court’s orders

accepting the recommendations of the magistrate judge and 

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint and the 

court’s order affirming the magistrate judge’s denial of 

Campbell’s motions to compel discovery. We have reviewed the 

record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for 

the reasons stated by the district court. Campbell v. Hammett,

No. 7:13-cv-01701-BHH (D.S.C. Feb. 26, 2014; Mar. 30, 2015). We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Appeal: 15-6606 Doc: 37 Filed: 08/25/2015 Pg: 3 of 3