Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-00581/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-00581-3/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Robey Kurt Hairston
Plaintiff
C. L. Phillips
Defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ROBEY KURT HAIRSTON,

Plaintiff,

v.

C. L. PHILLIPS,

Defendant.

No. 2:15-cv-0581 KJM CKD P

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

By an order filed June 2, 2015, plaintiff was ordered to file a completed in forma pauperis 

application within thirty days and was cautioned that failure to do so would result in a 

recommendation that this action be dismissed. The thirty day period has now expired, and 

plaintiff has not responded to the court’s order and has not filed a completed application.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without 

prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 

after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections 

with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings 

////

////

Case 2:15-cv-00581-KJM-CKD Document 11 Filed 07/13/15 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified 

time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 

(9th Cir. 1991).

Dated: July 13, 2015

2 / hair0581.fifp

_____________________________________

CAROLYN K. DELANEY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:15-cv-00581-KJM-CKD Document 11 Filed 07/13/15 Page 2 of 2