Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-mc-80129/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-mc-80129-3/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
California State Bar
Defendant
Bryan Robinson
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BRYAN ROBINSON,

Plaintiff,

v.

CALIFORNIA STATE BAR,

Defendant.

Case No. 3:15-mc-80129-JD 

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

Re: Dkt. No. 12

In response to Mr. Robinson’s ex parte motion to vacate and strike the order of suspension, 

dkt. no. 12, the Court orders Mr. Robinson to show cause why the motion should not be denied 

and sanctions should not be imposed.

The Court notes that trial of the State Bar’s petition for Mr. Robinson’s disbarment was 

scheduled for March 14-18, 2016. The Court also notes that the State Bar of California’s records 

indicate that Mr. Robinson has had a status of “Not Eligible to Practice Law” since March 17, 

2016. Consequently, it appears to the Court that Mr. Robinson was disbarred on March 17, 2016. 

Yet more than two months later, Mr. Robinson filed his ex parte motion to vacate and strike order 

of suspension, without any reference to his apparent disbarment.

Mr. Robinson may file a response to this order on or before August 15, 2016. If Mr. 

Robinson fails to file a timely and adequate response to this Order, his motion may be denied and 

monetary sanctions may be imposed.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 29, 2016

______________________________________

JAMES DONATO

United States District Judge

Case 3:15-mc-80129-JD Document 13 Filed 07/29/16 Page 1 of 1