Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ared-4_96-cr-00235/USCOURTS-ared-4_96-cr-00235-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Charles Gibbon
Defendant
United States of America
Plaintiff

Document Text:

OAO 247 (02/08) Order Regarding Motion for Sentence Reduction

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

Eastern District of Arkansas

United States of America )

)

)

)

)

)

v.

CHARLES GIBBON Case No: 4:96cr00235-01 JMM

USM No: 10332-112

Date of Previous Judgment: June 3, 1999 Herbert Wright, Jr. and Stephen E. Morley

(Use Date of Last Amended Judgment if Applicable) Defendant’s Attorney

Order Regarding Motion for Sentence Reduction Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2)

Upon motion of X the defendant ’ the Director of the Bureau of Prisons ’ the court under 18 U.S.C.

§ 3582(c)(2) for a reduction in the term of imprisonment imposed based on a guideline sentencing range that has

subsequently been lowered and made retroactive by the United States Sentencing Commission pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

§ 994(u), and having considered such motion,

IT IS ORDERED that the motion is:

’ DENIED. X GRANTED and the defendant’s previously imposed sentence of imprisonment (as reflected in 

the last judgment issued) of 235 months months is reduced to 188 months .

I. COURT DETERMINATION OF GUIDELINE RANGE (Prior to Any Departures)

Previous Offense Level: 36 Amended Offense Level: 34

Criminal History Category: III Criminal History Category: III

Previous Guideline Range: 235 to 293 months Amended Guideline Range: 188 to 235 months

II. SENTENCE RELATIVE TO AMENDED GUIDELINE RANGE

X The reduced sentence is within the amended guideline range.

’ The previous term of imprisonment imposed was less than the guideline range applicable to the defendant at the time 

of sentencing as a result of a departure or Rule 35 reduction, and the reduced sentence is comparably less than the

amended guideline range.

’ Other (explain):

III. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS

Except as provided above, all provisions of the judgment dated June 3, 1999 shall remain in effect.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Order Date: May 23, 2008 /s/ James M. Moody

Judge’s signature

Effective Date: James M. Moody, United States District Judge

(if different from order date) Printed name and title

Case 4:96-cr-00235-JMM Document 88 Filed 05/23/08 Page 1 of 1