Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-02299/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-02299-9/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Pamela Lynn Rux
Plaintiff
Starbucks Corporation
Defendant

Document Text:

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH 

PREJUDICE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

-1- LAW OFFICES OF JOHNNY L. GRIFFIN, III 

1010 F STREET, STE 200 SACRAMENTO, CA 95814 

PHONE: (916) 444-5557 FAX: (916) 444-5558

LAW OFFICES JOHNNY L. GRIFFIN III 

JOHNNY L. GRIFFIN, III (State Bar #118694) 

VICTORIA M. CIGANDA (State Bar #215719) 

1010 F Street, Suite 200 

Sacramento, California 95814 

Telephone: (916) 444-5557 

Facsimile: (916) 444-5558 

Attorneys for Plaintiff PAMELA LYNN RUX 

DAVID R. ONGARO, State Bar No. 154698 

DAVID R. BURTT, State Bar No. 201220 

JONMI NAI ON KOO, State Bar No. 233136 

PERKINS COIE LLP

Four Embarcadero Center, Suite 2400 

San Francisco, California 94111 

Telephone: (415) 344-7000 

Facsimile: (415) 344-7050 

Attorneys for Defendant 

STARBUCKS CORPORATION 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

PAMELA LYNN RUX, 

 Plaintiff, 

 

 vs. 

STARBUCKS CORPORATION, a Washington 

corporation; and DOES I through XX, inclusive, 

 Defendants. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 2:05-CV-02299-MCE-EFB 

 STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL 

 WITH PREJUDICE AND 

 [PROPOSED] ORDER [FRCP 41(a)(1)] 

/// 

/// 

/// 

/// 

Case 2:05-cv-02299-MCE -EFB Document 93 Filed 03/04/08 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH 

PREJUDICE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

-2- LAW OFFICES OF JOHNNY L. GRIFFIN, III 

1010 F STREET, STE 200 SACRAMENTO, CA 95814 

PHONE: (916) 444-5557 FAX: (916) 444-5558

 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between counsel for Plaintiff 

Pamela Lynn Rux and counsel for Defendant Starbucks Corporation, that pursuant to Federal 

Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1), the above-captioned action be and hereby is dismissed with 

prejudice in its entirety as to all claims and with respect to all parties, with each party to bear its 

or her own costs and attorneys’ fees. 

 IT IS SO STIPULATED.

 

 

Dated: December 20, 2007 LAW OFFICES OF JOHNNY L. GRIFFIN, III 

 

By: /s/ Victoria M. Ciganda ___ 

 VICTORIA M. CIGANDA 

 Attorney for PAMELA LYNN RUX 

Dated: December 20, 2007 PERKINS COIE LLP 

 By: /s/ David R. Burtt 

 DAVID R. BURTT 

 (As authorized on December 19, 2007) 

 Attorney for Defendant STARBUCKS 

CORPORATION 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: March 3, 2008 

__________________________________ 

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 2:05-cv-02299-MCE -EFB Document 93 Filed 03/04/08 Page 2 of 2