Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_14-cv-01198/USCOURTS-caed-1_14-cv-01198-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Arco am/pm #82423
Defendant
Mam Oil, Inc.
Defendant
Ronald Moore
Plaintiff
Namroud Investment, LLC
Defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Tanya E. Moore, SBN 206683

MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C.

332 North Second Street

San Jose, California 95112

Telephone (408) 298-2000

Facsimile (408) 298-6046

Email: tanya@moorelawfirm.com

Attorneys for Plaintiff

Ronald Moore

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RONALD MOORE,

Plaintiff,

vs.

NAMROUD INVESTMENT, LLC, et al.,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. 1:14-cv-01198---SAB

PLAINTIFF’S EX PARTE REQUEST TO 

CONTINUE MANDATORY 

SCHEDULING CONFERENCE; ORDER

WHEREAS, a Mandatory Scheduling Conference is currently scheduled in this matter 

for November 4, 2014;

WHEREAS, a clerk’s default was entered on October 24, 2014 against defendant, Mam 

Oil, Inc. dba Arco am/pm #82423 (Dkt. 9);

WHEREAS, Plaintiff, Ronald Moore (“Plaintiff”), has been unable to effect service of 

process to date on the remaining defendant, Namroud Investment, LLC (“Namroud”);

Case 1:14-cv-01198-LJO-SAB Document 11 Filed 10/30/14 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WHEREAS, Plaintiff is diligently attempting to effect service on Namroud, as more 

particularly set forth in the supporting declaration of Tanya E. Moore filed herewith, and if 

unable to serve Namroud within the next four weeks will bring a motion for an order 

permitting service of Namroud by publication;

NOW, THEREFORE, Plaintiff respectfully requests a continuance of the Mandatory 

Scheduling Conference to a date on or after January 6, 2015 at the court’s convenience, in 

order to allow Plaintiff to effect service on Namroud or bring a motion for an order permitting 

service on Namroud by publication, to allow Namroud to appear in the action, and to allow the 

parties to meet and confer in advance of the scheduling conference.

Dated: October 28, 2014 MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C.

/s/ Tanya E. Moore

Tanya E. Moore

Attorneys for Plaintiff

Ronald Moore

ORDER

Upon request by Plaintiff and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Mandatory Scheduling Conference currently set 

for November 4, 2014 be continued to January 20, 2015 at 3:00 p.m. before Magistrate Judge 

Stanley A. Boone in Courtroom 9 of the above-entitled Court. All other requirements set forth 

in the Court’s Order Setting Mandatory Scheduling Conference (Dkt. 4) shall remain 

unchanged.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 29, 2014 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:14-cv-01198-LJO-SAB Document 11 Filed 10/30/14 Page 2 of 2