Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cr-00703/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cr-00703-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Patrick Arnold
Defendant
USA
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]

ORDER EXCLUDING TIME

CR 05-00703 SI

KEVIN V. RYAN (CSBN 118321)

United States Attorney

EUMI L. CHOI (WVBN 0722)

Chief, Criminal Division

JEFFREY R. FINIGAN (CSBN 168285)

Assistant United States Attorney

450 Golden Gate Avenue

San Francisco, California 94102

Telephone: (415) 436-7232

Facsimile: (415) 436-7234

Email: jeffrey.finigan@usdoj.gov

Attorneys for Plaintiff

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

PATRICK ARNOLD,

Defendant.

 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Criminal No. CR 05-00703 SI

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]

ORDER EXCLUDING TIME

The above-captioned matter came before the Court on November 30, 2005 for initial

status conference. The defendant was represented by Nancy Clarence and Richard Collins and

the government was represented by Jeffrey Finigan, Assistant United States Attorney. The case

was set for January 27, 2006, at 11:00 a.m. for further status and trial/motions settings.

The Court made a finding on the record that the time from and including November 30,

2005 through January 27, 2006, should be excluded under the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C.

Case 3:05-cr-00703-SI Document 9 Filed 12/01/2005 Page 1 of 3
 Case 3:05-cr-00703-SI Document 11 Filed 12/05/05 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]

ORDER EXCLUDING TIME

CR 05-00703 SI 2

§ 3161(h)(8)(A), because the ends of justice served by taking such action outweighed the best

interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. That finding was based on the need for

the defendant to have reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the

exercise of due diligence, and for continuity of counsel pursuant to 18 U.S.C.

§ 3161(h)(8)(B)(iv). 

The parties hereby agree to and request that the case be continued until January 27,

2006 and that the exclusion of time until then be granted. The parties agree and stipulate that the

additional time is appropriate and necessary under Title 18, United States Code, § 3161(h)(8)(A),

because the ends of justice served by this continuance outweigh the best interest of the public and

the defendant in a speedy trial. This time exclusion will allow defense counsel to effectively

prepare, taking into account the exercise of due diligence, and will provide for continuity of

counsel for the defendants.

DATED: 11/30/05 /s/ 

NANCY CLARENCE

Counsel for Patrick Arnold

DATED: 11/30/05 /s/ 

JEFFREY FINIGAN

Assistant U.S. Attorney

So ordered.

DATED: 

SUSAN ILLSTON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

Case 3:05-cr-00703-SI Document 9 Filed 12/01/2005 Page 2 of 3

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Susan Illston

Case 3:05-cr-00703-SI Document 11 Filed 12/05/05 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]

ORDER EXCLUDING TIME

CR 05-00703 SI 3

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned hereby certifies that she is an employee of the office of the United States

Attorney, Northern District of California and is a person of such age and discretion to be

competent to serve papers. The undersigned certifies that she caused copies of

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXCLUDING TIME

in the case of UNITED STATES V. PATRICK ARNOLD, CR 05-00703 SI to be served on

the parties in this action, by placing a true copy thereof in a sealed envelope, addressed as follows

which is the last known address:

Nanci Clarence, Esq.

Clarence Snell & Dyer

899 Ellis Street

San Francisco, CA 94109

 (By Personal Service), I caused such envelope to be delivered by hand to the person or

 offices of each addressee(s) above.

 X (By Facsimile), I caused each such document to be sent by Facsimile to the person or 

offices of each addressee(s) above.

 (By Mail), I caused each such envelope, with postage thereon fully prepaid, to be placed 

in the United States mail at San Francisco, California.

 (By Fed Ex), I caused each such envelope to be delivered by FED EX to the address

 listed above.

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.

Dated: November 30, 2005

 /s/ 

RAWATY YIM

United States Attorney’s Office

Case 3:05-cr-00703-SI Document 9 Filed 12/01/2005 Page 3 of 3
 Case 3:05-cr-00703-SI Document 11 Filed 12/05/05 Page 3 of 3