Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-00183/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-00183-2/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
David Chen Pui
Petitioner
Dennis Smith
Respondent

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

U.S. District Court

 E. D. California cd 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DAVID CHEN PUI, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

)

v. )

)

)

DENNIS SMITH, )

)

Respondent. )

 )

1:07-CV-00183 AWI DLB HC

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND 

RECOMMENDATION 

[Doc. #4]

ORDER GRANTING PETITION FOR WRIT

OF HABEAS CORPUS

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT

TO ENTER JUDGMENT 

Petitioner is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. 

On February 12, 2007, the Magistrate Judge issued a Findings and Recommendation that

recommended the petition for writ of habeas corpus be GRANTED and Respondent be ORDERED

to consider whether Petitioner should be transferred to a Residential Re-Entry Center (“RRC”). This

Findings and Recommendation was served on all parties and contained notice that any objections to

the Findings and Recommendation were to be filed within ten (10) days of the date of service of the

order. Over ten (10) days have passed and no party has filed objections.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a de

Case 1:07-cv-00183-AWI-DLB Document 6 Filed 03/22/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

U.S. District Court

 E. D. California cd 2

novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds that the Findings

and Recommendation is supported by the record and proper analysis. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:

1. The petition for writ of habeas corpus is GRANTED;

2. Respondent is ORDERED to consider the appropriateness of transferring Petitioner to an

RRC in light of the factors set forth in § 3621(b), not excluding any other factors deemed appropriate

by the BOP, without reference to the BOP policy promulgated in December 2002 and without

reference to the BOP’s February 14, 2005, amendment to 28 C.F.R. § 570.21. Respondent is

ORDERED to make this determination promptly, not to exceed 14 days from the date of this

Opinion and Order.

3. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to enter judgment for Petitioner.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 22, 2007 /s/ Anthony W. Ishii 

0m8i78 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:07-cv-00183-AWI-DLB Document 6 Filed 03/22/07 Page 2 of 2