Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-almd-2_14-cv-00355/USCOURTS-almd-2_14-cv-00355-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Arkansas State University
Defendant
Brian Keith Boyer
Defendant
Sidney Hooten
Plaintiff
State of Arkansas
Defendant

Document Text:

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION 

SIDNEY HOOTEN, 

individually and as an 

incapacitated person by 

and through his next 

friend Nicole Harris, 

)

) 

) 

) 

) 

)

 Plaintiff, )

) CIVIL ACTION NO.

 v. ) 2:14cv355-MHT 

) (WO) 

BRIAN KEITH BOYER,

individually and as an 

employee of Arkansas 

State University and the 

State of Arkansas, 

et al., 

)

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

 Defendants. )

ORDER 

It is ORDERED that the motions for extension of 

time (doc. nos. 50 and 51) are denied with leave to 

refile. 

*** 

This court has made clear that, “A request or 

motion for extension of a deadline in any court order 

... must indicate that movant has, in a timely manner, 

Case 2:14-cv-00355-MHT-TFM Document 53 Filed 05/11/15 Page 1 of 2
previously contacted counsel for all other parties; and 

..., based on that contact, must state whether counsel 

for all other parties agree to or oppose the extension 

request or motion,” and that, “A request or motion that 

fails to meet this requirement will be denied outright, 

unless the movant offers a credible explanation in the 

request or motion why this requirement has not been 

met.” Scheduling Order (doc. no. 13), § 15(B). Movant 

here has failed to comply with these requirements. 

DONE, this the 11th day of May, 2015. 

 /s/ Myron H. Thompson 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:14-cv-00355-MHT-TFM Document 53 Filed 05/11/15 Page 2 of 2