Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_16-cv-05084/USCOURTS-cand-4_16-cv-05084-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Defendant
Gary Marsh
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-1- 

Marsh v. Federal Home Loan Bank 

Joint Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Submitting Entire Action to Arbitration 

ILG Legal Office 

Stephen Noel Ilg (SBN 275599) 

silg@ilglegal.com 

Frank Zeccola 308875 

fzeccola@ilglegal.com 

555 California Street, Suite 4925 

San Francisco, CA 94104 

Attorneys for Plaintiff Gary Marsh 

Douglas J. Melton, Bar No. 161353 

April P. Santos, Bar No. 266367 

LONG & LEVIT LLP 

465 California Street, 5th Floor 

San Francisco, California 94104 

Telephone: (415) 397-2222 

Facsimile: (415) 397-6392 

dmelton@longlevit.com 

asantos@longlevit.com

Attorneys for Defendant 

FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK OF SAN 

FRANCISCO 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

Gary Marsh, on behalf of himself, 

 Plaintiff 

 vs. 

Federal Home Loan Bank of San 

Francisco, a California Corporation, and 

DOES 1 through 100, inclusive, 

Defendants. 

 Case No. 4:16-cv-05084-KAW 

JOINT STIPULATION AND 

[PROPOSED] ORDER SUBMITTING 

ENTIRE ACTION TO ARBITRATION 

AND STAYING PROCEEDING 

Case 4:16-cv-05084-KAW Document 15 Filed 09/27/16 Page 1 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-2- 

Marsh v. Federal Home Loan Bank 

Joint Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Submitting Entire Action to Arbitration 

Plaintiff GARY MARSH (“Plaintiff”) and FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK OF SAN 

FRANCISCO (“Defendant”), by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate 

and agree as follows: 

WHEREAS, on July 19, 2016, Plaintiff filed a Complaint against Defendant in the 

Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco; 

WHEREAS, Defendant removed the case to the United States District Court, Northern 

District of California; 

WHEREAS, during his employment with Defendant, Plaintiff entered into an agreement 

to arbitrate any and all claims arising out of Plaintiff’s employment with Defendant, pursuant to 

the Federal Arbitration Act (9 U.S.C. §§ 1-16), which Defendant contends is valid and binding 

with respect to Plaintiff’s claims in this action (the “Arbitration Agreement”); 

WHEREAS, Plaintiff and Defendant agree that Plaintiff’s claims should be submitted to 

binding arbitration, pursuant to the terms of the Arbitration Agreement; 

WHEREAS, the parties agree that Plaintiff’s Complaint against Defendant filed on July 

19, 2016 is deemed as the served Request for Arbitration; 

WHEREAS, the parties agree to stay all proceedings in this case until arbitration has 

been completed; provided however, that this stipulation shall not be construed as a waiver of 

Defendant’s right to seek dismissal of this case upon completion of the binding arbitration. 

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED between the Parties, by and 

through their respective attorneys of record, subject to an order of the Court, that: 

(1) All of Plaintiff’s claims in this case shall be submitted to final and binding 

arbitration in accordance with the Arbitration Agreement; 

(2) The Parties agree to meet and confer regarding the selection of a mutually agreeable 

arbitrator; 

(3) This action shall be stayed pursuant to 9 U.S.C. § 3 pending the completion of 

binding arbitration; 

(4) The Court shall retain jurisdiction to enter orders regarding the arbitrator’s award as 

provided in 9 U.S.C. §§ 9-13; and 

Case 4:16-cv-05084-KAW Document 15 Filed 09/27/16 Page 2 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-3- 

Marsh v. Federal Home Loan Bank 

Joint Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Submitting Entire Action to Arbitration 

 (5) Any and all pending deadlines before or with this Court should be taken off calendar. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

DATED: September 23, 2016 

 /s/ Stephen Noel Ilg 

______________________________________ 

 Stephen Noel Ilg 

 Ilg Legal Office 

 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

Dated: September 23, 2016 

/s/ Douglas J. Melton 

 _______________________________________ 

Douglas J. Melton 

Long & Levit, LLP 

Attorneys for Defendant 

Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco 

Pursuant to Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I, STEPHEN NOEL ILG, attest that 

concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from each of the other Signatories. 

DATED: September 23, 2016 

 /s/ Stephen Noel Ilg 

______________________________________ 

 Stephen Noel Ilg 

 Ilg Legal Office 

 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

 

Case 4:16-cv-05084-KAW Document 15 Filed 09/27/16 Page 3 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-4- 

Marsh v. Federal Home Loan Bank 

Joint Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Submitting Entire Action to Arbitration 

ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated:_____________________ __________________________________________ 

 

 MAGISTRATE KANDIS A. WESTMORE 

9/27/16

Case 4:16-cv-05084-KAW Document 15 Filed 09/27/16 Page 4 of 4