Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-09-07626/USCOURTS-ca4-09-07626-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Leon McCollum
Appellant
United States of America
Appellee

Document Text:

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 09-7626

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff - Appellee, 

 v. 

LEON MCCOLLUM, a/k/a Leon McCullough, a/k/a Black, 

 Defendant - Appellant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Florence. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge. 

(4:06-cr-00082-RBH-1) 

Submitted: January 14, 2010 Decided: January 21, 2010 

Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. 

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Leon McCollum, Appellant Pro Se. Rose Mary Sheppard Parham, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South Carolina, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 

Appeal: 09-7626 Doc: 7 Filed: 01/21/2010 Pg: 1 of 2
2 

PER CURIAM: 

Leon McCollum appeals the district court’s order 

denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006) motion for reduction of 

sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible 

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the 

district court. United States v. McCollum, No. 4:06-cr-00082-

RBH-1 (D.S.C. filed Aug. 11, 2009, entered Aug. 12, 2009). 

McCollum’s challenge to the career offender enhancement cannot 

be addressed in a § 3582 motion. See United States v. Dunphy, 

551 F.3d 247, 251-53 (4th Cir.) (holding that “proceedings under 

§ 3582(c) do not constitute a full resentencing”), cert. denied, 

129 S. Ct. 240 (2009). We dispense with oral argument because 

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before the court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process. 

AFFIRMED

Appeal: 09-7626 Doc: 7 Filed: 01/21/2010 Pg: 2 of 2