Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_14-cv-00038/USCOURTS-caed-1_14-cv-00038-5/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Jose Gonzalez
Plaintiff
Harris Farms, Inc.
Cross Claimant
Harris Ranch Beef Company
Defendant
Harris Ranch Beef Holding Company
Defendant
Springer-Miller Systems, Inc.
Cross Defendant

Document Text:

COOLEY LLP

ATTO RN EY S AT LA W

SA N FRA N CI S CO

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

110805444 v1

ORDER GRANTING THIRD-PARTY DEF’S REQ.

FOR EXTENSION OF PAGE LIMITS

1:14-CV-00038-LIO-SAB

COOLEY LLP

WHITTY SOMVICHIAN (194463) 

(wsomvichian@cooley.com)

DAVID S. HOUSKA (295918)

(dhouska@cooley.com)

101 California Street, 5th Floor

San Francisco, CA 94111-5800

Telephone: (415) 693-2000

Facsimile: (415) 693-2222

Attorneys for Third-Party Defendant

PAR SPRINGER-MILLER SYSTEMS, INC.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

FRESNO DIVISION

JOSE GONZALEZ, on behalf of himself 

and all others similarly situated,

Plaintiff,

v.

HARRIS RANCH BEEF COMPANY, a 

California corporation; HARRIS RANCH 

BEEF HOLDING COMPANY, a 

California corporation; HARRIS FARMS, 

INC., a California corporation; and DOES 

2 through 10, inclusive,

Defendants.

Case No. 1:14-cv-00038-LIO-SAB

ORDER GRANTING THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT 

PAR SPRINGER-MILLER’S REQUEST FOR 

EXTENSION OF PAGE LIMITS

Complaint Filed: December 4, 2013

Cross-Complaint Filed: June 2, 2014

HARRIS FARMS, INC., a California 

corporation,

Third-Party 

Complainant,

v.

SPRINGER-MILLER SYSTEMS, INC., a 

Vermont corporation and DOES 1-20, 

inclusive,

Third-Party Defendants.

Case 1:14-cv-00038-LJO-SAB Document 43 Filed 10/06/14 Page 1 of 2
COOLEY LLP

ATTO RN EY S AT LA W

SA N FRA N CI S CO

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

110805444 v1 1.

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING THIRD-PARTY 

DEF’S REQ. FOR EXTENSION OF PAGE LIMITS 

1:14-CV-00038-LIO-SAB

This Matter, having come before the Court on the Objection of Harris Ranch, filed 

October 2, 2014, and Third-Party Defendant PAR Springer-Miller Systems, Inc.’s Request For 

Extension of Page Limits, filed October 3, 2014, and the Court having considered all papers and 

pleadings submitted by the parties:

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

Third-Party Defendant PAR Springer-Miller Systems, Inc.’s Request For Extension of 

Page Limits is GRANTED. The page limit for PAR Springer-Miller’s Reply brief in the action 

above will be extended to 11 pages. The Court will consider the brief as it was originally filled.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 6, 2014 /s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:14-cv-00038-LJO-SAB Document 43 Filed 10/06/14 Page 2 of 2