Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca5-15-20251/USCOURTS-ca5-15-20251-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Gonazlo Delgado Razo
Appellant
United States of America
Appellee

Document Text:

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-20251

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

GONAZLO DELGADO RAZO, also known as Carlos Israel Gamez, also 

known as Armando Salinas, also known as Gonzalo Razo, also known as 

Gonzalo Razo-Delgado, also known as Gonzalo Delgado Raso,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:14-CR-393-1

Before JOLLY, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Gonazlo Delgado 

Razo has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with 

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 

229 (5th Cir. 2011). Razo has not filed a response, has completed the 

confinement portion of his sentence, and has been removed from the United 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

December 29, 2015

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 15-20251 Document: 00513323714 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/29/2015
No. 15-20251

2

States. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the 

record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal 

presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review even if the challenge to his 

sentence is not moot. See United States v. Rosenbaum-Alanis, 483 F.3d 381, 

381-83 (5th Cir. 2007); see also United States v. Heredia-Holguin, 789 F.3d 625 

(5th Cir.), reh’g en banc granted, 803 F.3d 745 (5th Cir. 2015). Accordingly, 

counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from 

further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR.

R. 42.2.

 Case: 15-20251 Document: 00513323714 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/29/2015