Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-04194/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-04194-2/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
David Eichler
Defendant
Langley Partners, L.P.
Plaintiff
Tripath Technology, Inc.
Defendant
Adya Tripathi
Defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION RE TIME TO RESPOND

GILBERT R. SEROTA (No. 75305)

Email: gserota@howardrice.com

SARAH A. GOOD (No. 148742)

Email: sgood@howardrice.com

CLARA J. SHIN (No. 214809)

Email: cshin@howardrice.com

SARAH J. GIVAN (No. 238301)

Email: sgivan@howardrice.com

HOWARD RICE NEMEROVSKI CANADY FALK

& RABKIN

A Professional Corporation

Three Embarcadero Center, 7th Floor

San Francisco, California 94111-4024

Telephone: 415/434-1600

Facsimile: 415/217-5910

Attorneys for Defendant

TRIPATH TECHNOLOGY, INC.

[Other Counsel Listed On Signature Pages]

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

LANGLEY PARTNERS, L.P.,

Plaintiff,

v.

TRIPATH TECHNOLOGY, INC., ADYA

TRIPATHI, AND DAVID EICHLER,

Defendants.

No. 05 CV 04194 SC

STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME FOR

DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO

COMPLAINT

ORDER

Case 3:05-cv-04194-SC Document 28 Filed 04/24/06 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION RE TIME TO RESPOND

-1-

STIPULATION

Plaintiff Langley Partners, L.P. (“Plaintiff”) and Defendants Tripath Technology, Inc., Dr.

Adya S. Tripathi and David Eichler (collectively, “Defendants”) hereby agree by and through their

counsel of record as follows:

WHEREAS, on March 7, 2006, this court entered an order granting in part and denying in part

Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss, granting Plaintiff until April 6, 2006 to amend the Complaint;

WHEREAS, Plaintiff has elected not to amend the Complaint and instead proceed on those

claims that were not dismissed;

WHEREAS, pursuant to Local Rule 6-1(a), the Parties may stipulate in writing, without a

court order, to extend the time within which to respond to the Complaint;

THEREFORE THE PARTIES HEREBY STIPULATE AND AGREE that the Defendants’

response to the Complaint shall be filed no later than May 3, 2006.

Case 3:05-cv-04194-SC Document 28 Filed 04/24/06 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION RE TIME TO RESPOND

-2-

DATED: April 11, 2006. GILBERT R. SEROTA

SARAH A. GOOD

CLARA J. SHIN

HOWARD RICE NEMEROVSKI CANADY

FALK & RABKIN

A Professional Corporation

By: /s/

SARAH A. GOOD

Attorneys for Defendant

TRIPATH TECHNOLOGY INC.

DATED: April 11, 2006.

SUSAN S. MUCK (No. 126930)

RACHAEL G. SAMBERG (No. 223694)

FENWICK & WEST LLP

Embarcadero Center West

275 Battery Street

San Francisco, CA 94111

Telephone: 415/875-2300

Facsimile: 415/281-1350

By: ___________________ /s/

RACHAEL G. SAMBERG

Attorneys for Defendants

DR. ADYA S. TRIPATHI and DAVID EICHLER

DATED: April 11, 2006.

PERRIE M. WEINER (No. 134146)

GREGG D. ZUCKER (No. 166692)

NICOLAS MORGAN (No. 166441)

GREGORY JUNG (No. 203350)

DLA PIPER RUDNICK GRAY CARY US LLP

153 Townsend Street, Suite 800

San Francisco, CA 94107-1957

Tel: 415.836.2500

Fax: 415.836.2501

By: ___________________ /s/

NICHOLAS MORGAN

Attorneys for Plaintiff

LANGLEY PARTNERS, L.P.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Samuel Conti

4/24/06

Case 3:05-cv-04194-SC Document 28 Filed 04/24/06 Page 3 of 3