Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_08-cv-01455/USCOURTS-caed-1_08-cv-01455-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Gregory Brownlow
Plaintiff
K. Mendoza-Powers
Defendant

Document Text:

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Order of Dismissal

P:\PRO-SE\SJ.JW\CR.04\Brownlow4522_dismiss3-11.wpd

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GREGORY BROWNLOW,

Plaintiff,

 vs.

K. MENDOZA-POWERS,

Defendant.

 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. C 04-04522 JW (PR)

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

Plaintiff initiated this suit on October 27, 2004. On May 11, 2007, the Court

issued an order “Re Electronic Filing in Cases with Unrepresented Parties.” On June 25,

2007, the order was returned as undeliverable, indicating that plaintiff was not in custody.

Pursuant to Northern District Local Rule 3-11, a party proceeding pro se whose

address changes while an action is pending must promptly file and serve upon all opposing

parties a notice of change of address specifying the new address. See L.R. 3- 11(a ). The

Court may, without prejudice, dismiss a complaint or strike an answer when: (1) mail

directed to the attorney or the pro se party by the court has been returned to the court as not

Case 1:08-cv-01455-JLS -RBB Document 12 Filed 09/06/07 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Order of Dismissal

P:\PRO-SE\SJ.JW\CR.04\Brownlow4522_dismiss3-11.wpd 2

deliverable, and (2) the court fails to receive within sixty days of this return a written

communication from the attorney or pro se party indicating a current address. See L.R.

3-11(b). 

It has now been more than sixty days since the Court’s order was returned as

undeliverable. The Court has not received a notice from plaintiff of a new address. 

Accordingly, this action is DISMISSED without prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); L.R.

3-11(b).

DATED: 

JAMES WARE

United States District Judge 

Case 1:08-cv-01455-JLS -RBB Document 12 Filed 09/06/07 Page 2 of 2