Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-00242/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-00242-3/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
James Tingey
Defendant
Clarence M. Willis
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CLARENCE M. WILLIS, No. 06-cv-0242-MCE-JFM-PS

Plaintiff, 

v. ORDER

JAMES TINGEY, 

Defendant.

 /

Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed the above-entitled

action. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate

Judge pursuant to Local Rule 72-302(c)(21).

On May 5, 2006, the magistrate judge filed Findings and

Recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which

contained notice to all parties that any objections to the

Findings and Recommendations were to be filed within ten (10)

days. Plaintiff has filed Objections to the Findings and

Recommendations.

///

Case 2:06-cv-00242-MCE -JFM Document 21 Filed 08/08/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C.

§ 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 72-304, this Court has conducted a

de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the

entire file, the Court finds the Findings and Recommendations to

be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations filed May 5, 2006, are

adopted in full; 

2. Defendant’s February 28, 2006 Motion to Dismiss is

granted.

DATED: August 8, 2006 

__________________________________

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 2:06-cv-00242-MCE -JFM Document 21 Filed 08/08/06 Page 2 of 2