Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-00841/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-00841-3/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Maximus, Inc.
Plaintiff
Nimbus Data Systems, Inc.
Counter Claimant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 Case No. Case No. 2:14-cv-00841-JAM-KJN 

JOINT STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO F.R.C.P. RULE 41(a)(1) AND 41(c); 

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

Jeremy Meier (SBN 139849) 

Anthony J. Cortez (SBN 251743) 

GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP 

1201 K Street, Suite 1100 

Sacramento, CA 95814-3938 

Telephone: (916) 442-1111 

Facsimile: (916) 448-1709 

meierj@gtlaw.com 

cortezan@gtlaw.com 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

And Counter Defendant 

MAXIMUS, Inc. 

William J. Frimel (SBN 160287) 

SEUBERT FRENCH FRIMEL & WARNER LLP 

1075 Curtis Street 

Menlo Park, CA 94025 

Tel: 650.322.3048 

Margaret A. Crawford (SBN 238205) 

LAW OFFICES OF MARGARET A. CRAWFORD 

626 Pico Ave. 

San Mateo, CA 94403 

Tel: 650.312.8545 

Attorneys for Defendant and Counter Complainant 

NIMBUS DATA SYSTEMS, INC. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

MAXIMUS, INC., a Virginia corporation, 

 Plaintiff, 

v. 

NIMBUS DATA SYSTEMS, INC., a Delaware 

corporation, and DOES 1 - 50, 

 Defendant. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

)

CASE NO. 2:14-cv-00841-JAM-KJN 

JOINT STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL 

WITH PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO F.R.C.P. 

RULE 41(a)(1) AND 41(c); ORDER 

 

AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIM. 

)

) 

)

Case 2:14-cv-00841-JAM-KJN Document 23 Filed 01/27/16 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 1 Case No. Case No. 2:14-cv-00841-JAM-KJN 

JOINT STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO F.R.C.P. RULE 41(a)(1) AND 41(c); 

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

WHEREAS Plaintiff And Counter Defendant MAXIMUS, INC. and Defendant and Counter 

Complainant NIMBUS DATA SYSTEMS, INC. agree that all claims in the above-captioned proceeding 

have been fully settled and compromised; 

 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties to this action, through their 

undersigned counsel, that the entire above-captioned action be and hereby is dismissed with prejudice as 

to Plaintiff and Counter Defendant MAXIMUS, INC. pursuant to F.R.C.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) and as to 

Defendant and Counter Complainant NIMBUS DATA SYTEMS, INC. pursuant to F.R.C.P. 41(c); 

 IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED by and between the parties that each party shall bear its own 

attorneys’ fee and costs of suit. 

DATED: January 26, 2016 GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP 

By: //s// Jeremy A. Meier 

Jeremy A. Meier 

Anthony J. Cortez 

Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counter Defendant 

MAXIMUS, Inc. 

DATED: January 26, 2016 SEUBERT FRENCH FRIMEL AND WARNER 

By: //s// William J. Frimel 

WILLIAM J. FRIMEL 

Attorneys for Defendant and Counter Complainant 

NIMBUS DATA SYSTEMS, INC.

Case 2:14-cv-00841-JAM-KJN Document 23 Filed 01/27/16 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 2 Case No. Case No. 2:14-cv-00841-JAM-KJN 

JOINT STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO F.R.C.P. RULE 41(a)(1) AND 41(c); 

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

ORDER

 In view of the parties’ Stipulation, the Court orders the above-captioned action be dismissed with 

prejudice, in its entirety, as to both parties. Each party to this action shall bear its own attorneys’ fees and 

costs of suit. 

 IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: 1/26/2016 

 /s/ John A. Mendez_____________ 

John A. Mendez 

United States District Court Judge 

 Eastern District of California 

Case 2:14-cv-00841-JAM-KJN Document 23 Filed 01/27/16 Page 3 of 3