Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-00471/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-00471-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Terrell Elbert
Plaintiff
Brian Miller
Defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

WILLIAMS & ASSOCIATES

1250 Sutterville Road, Ste. 290

Sacramento, CA 95822

(916) 456-1122

(916) 737-1126 (fax)

Kathleen J. Williams, CSB #127021

Attorneys for defendant

BRIAN MILLER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TERRELL ELBERT,

Plaintiff,

vs.

BRIAN MILLER, individually and in his 

official capacity as Deputy Sheriff for 

the County of Solano, Deputy Sheriff 

DOES 1-25, inclusive,

Defendants.

No. 2:14-cv-00471 GEB KJN

STIPULATION FOR PROTECTIVE 

ORDER AND ORDER REGARDING

SHOOTING BOARD OF REVIEW

Plaintiff TERRELL ELBERT, and his attorneys and defendant BRIAN MILLER and 

his attorneys make this stipulation. 

Plaintiff has requested the Shooting Board of Review records from defendant. 

Pursuant to that request, the parties agree to protect the confidentiality of the Shooting 

Board of Review records regarding the February 12, 2012 incident. 

NOW THEREFORE, the parties stipulate to the following: 

1. The following records are subject to a protective order (and designated as 

“Confidential Material”): Shooting Board of Review CR 12-0689, incident date 

February 12, 2012. 

///

Case 2:14-cv-00471-GEB-KJN Document 13 Filed 01/22/15 Page 1 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

2. Confidential material may not be disclosed except as set forth in 

paragraphs three through five. 

3. Confidential Material may be disclosed only to the following persons: (a)

counsel for any party to this action; (b) paralegal, stenographic, clerical, and secretarial 

personnel regularly employed by counsel referred to in paragraph 3(a); (c) Court 

personnel including stenographic reporters engaged in such proceedings as are 

necessarily incidental to preparation for the trial of this action; (d) any outside expert or 

consultant retained in connection with this action, and not otherwise employed by either 

party; (e) any “in house” expert designated by defendant to testify at trial in this matter; 

(f) witnesses who may have the documents disclosed to them during deposition 

proceedings (the witnesses may not leave the depositions with copies of the documents, 

and shall be bound by the provisions of paragraph five); (g) any Neutral Evaluator or 

other designated ADR provider; (h) parties to this action; and (i) the jury, should this 

matter go to trial. 

4. Each person to whom disclosure is made, with the exception of counsel 

who are presumed to know of the contents of this protective order, shall, prior to 

disclosure: (1) be provided with a copy of this order by the person furnishing him/her 

such material, and (2) agree on the record or in writing that she/he has read the 

protective order and that she/he understand the provisions of the protective order. Such 

person must also consent to be subject to the jurisdiction of the United States District 

Court, Eastern District, with respect to any proceeding relating to the enforcement of this 

order. Nothing in this paragraph is intended to prevent officials or employees of the 

Solano County or other authorized government officials or any other persons from 

having access to the documents if they would have had access in the normal course of 

Case 2:14-cv-00471-GEB-KJN Document 13 Filed 01/22/15 Page 2 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3

their job duties or rights as a citizen. Further, nothing in this order prevents a witness 

from disclosing events or activities personal to them, i.e., a witness can disclose to 

others previous information given with respect to what she/he saw, heard, or otherwise 

sensed. 

5. At the conclusion of the trial and of any appeal or upon other termination of 

this litigation, all Confidential Material received under the provision of this order 

(including any copies made) shall be returned to counsel for BRIAN MILLER and 

destroyed by counsel for BRIAN MILLER. Provisions of this order insofar as they restrict 

disclosure and use of the material shall be in effect until all Confidential Material 

(including all copies thereof) are destroyed by counsel for BRIAN MILLER. 

6. In the event that either party wishes to file Confidential Material with the 

court, as an exhibit to a pleading or otherwise, the filing party shall first seek an order to 

file under seal pursuant to Local Rule 141. The Request to Seal Documents shall refer to 

this stipulation and protective order. 

7. Nothing in this order shall preclude a party from showing or disclosing any 

documents, e.g., deposition transcript, pleading or brief, which otherwise contain 

Confidential Material as defined in paragraph 1, as long as such document has been 

redacted so as to prevent disclosure of such Confidential Material. 

8. The foregoing is without prejudice to the right of any party (a) to apply to 

the Court for a further protective order relating to any Confidential Material or relating to 

discovery in this litigation; (b) to apply to the Court for an order removing the Confidential 

Material designation from any document; and (c) to apply to the Court for an order 

compelling production of documents or modification of this order or for any order 

permitting disclosure of Confidential Materials beyond the terms of this order. 

Case 2:14-cv-00471-GEB-KJN Document 13 Filed 01/22/15 Page 3 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

4

DATED: January 19, 2015 WILLIAMS & ASSOCIATES

By: /s/ Kathleen J. Williams_____________ 

KATHLEEN J. WILLIAMS

Attorneys for defendant MILLER

DATED: October 17, 2014 LAW OFFICES OF JOHN L. BURRIS

By:/s/ Adante Pointer (original sig. retained by counsel)

ADANTE POINTER 

Attorneys for plaintiff ELBERT

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 22, 2015

Case 2:14-cv-00471-GEB-KJN Document 13 Filed 01/22/15 Page 4 of 4