Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca5-14-11245/USCOURTS-ca5-14-11245-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Kamardeen Ogunleye
Appellant
United States of America
Appellee

Document Text:

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-11245

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

KAMARDEEN OGUNLEYE,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:14-CR-28-1

Before KING, CLEMENT, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Kamardeen Ogunleye has moved 

for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. 

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th 

Cir. 2011). Ogunleye has filed a response and has moved for the appointment 

of new counsel. The record is not sufficiently developed to allow us to make a 

fair evaluation of Ogunleye’s claims of ineffective assistance of counsel; we 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

October 7, 2015

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 14-11245 Document: 00513222702 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/07/2015
No. 14-11245

2

therefore decline to consider the claims without prejudice to collateral review. 

See United States v. Isgar, 739 F.3d 829, 841 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 135 S. Ct. 

123 (2014).

We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record 

reflected therein, as well as Ogunleye’s response. We concur with counsel’s 

assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. 

Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, and counsel 

is excused from further responsibilities herein. Ogunleye’s motion for the 

appointment of new counsel is DENIED as untimely. See United States v. 

Wagner, 158 F.3d 901, 902-03 (5th Cir. 1998). The APPEAL IS DISMISSED. 

See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 14-11245 Document: 00513222702 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/07/2015