Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-08-01435/USCOURTS-ca4-08-01435-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Timothy R. Martin
Appellant
Scott & Stringfellow
Appellee

Document Text:

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-1435

TIMOTHY R. MARTIN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

SCOTT & STRINGFELLOW, INC.,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, District

Judge. (3:06-cv-00207-HEH)

Submitted: September 16, 2008 Decided: October 6, 2008

Before WILKINSON, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Timothy R. Martin, Appellant Pro Se. David Edward Constine, III,

TROUTMAN & SANDERS, LLP, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 08-1435 Doc: 21 Filed: 10/06/2008 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Timothy R. Martin appeals the district court’s order

denying his motion to vacate the arbitration award granted to Scott

& Stringfellow, Inc. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant Martin’s motion

to supplement his reply brief, we affirm for the reasons stated by

the district court. Martin v. Scott & Stringfellow, Inc., No.

3:06-cv-00207-HEH (E.D. Va. filed Mar. 13, entered Mar. 14, 2008).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Appeal: 08-1435 Doc: 21 Filed: 10/06/2008 Pg: 2 of 2