Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-03653/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-03653-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Lifescan, Inc.
Counter-defendant
Roche Diagnostics Corporation
Counter-claimant

Document Text:

1 

 2 

 3 

 4 

 5 

 6 

 7 

 8 

 9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

STIPULATION AND ORDER RESETTING THE TIME FOR THE FURTHER CASE MANG’T CONF 

Case No. C 04-3653 SI 

1 

PA/52156207.1

BINGHAM McCUTCHEN LLP ROCHE DIAGNOSTICS CORP. 

James B. Lewis (SBN 71669) Brent Harris (admitted pro hac vice) 

Thomas E. Kuhnle (SBN 178055) 9115 Hague Road 

1900 University Avenue Indianapolis, Indiana 46250 

East Palo Alto, California 94303 Telephone: (317) 845-2000 

Telephone: (650) 849-4400 

Facsimile: (650) 849-4800 

MCDONNELL BOEHNEN HULBERT & BERGHOFF LLP 

Daniel A. Boehnen (admitted pro hac vice) 

Grantland G. Drutchas (admitted pro hac vice) 

300 S. Wacker Drive 

Chicago, Illinois 60606 

Telephone: (312) 913-0001 

Facsimile: (312) 913-0002 

Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant 

Roche Diagnostics Corporation 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

LIFESCAN, INC., a California corporation, 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

ROCHE DIAGNOSTICS CORPORATION, 

an Indiana corporation, 

 Defendant. 

CASE NO. C 04 3653 SI 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER RESETTING THE TIME FOR 

THE FURTHER CASE MANAGEMENT 

CONFERENCE 

Date: March 9, 2007 

Time: tba 

Ctrm.: 10, 19th Floor 

Before: Hon. Susan Illston 

AND RELATED ACTIONS 

/ / / 

/ / / 

/ / / 

Case 3:04-cv-03653-SI Document 61 Filed 02/26/2007 Page 1 of 3
 Case 3:04-cv-03653-SI Document 62 Filed 03/02/07 Page 1 of 3
 1 

 2 

 3 

 4 

 5 

 6 

 7 

 8 

 9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

STIPULATION AND ORDER RESETTING THE TIME FOR THE FURTHER CASE MANG’T CONF 

Case No. C 04-3653 SI 

2 

PA/52156207.1

Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant LifeScan, Inc. (“LifeScan”), and 

Defendant and Counterclaimant, Roche Diagnostics Corporation (“Roche”), jointly submit this 

Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Resetting the Time for the Further Case Management 

Conference. The bases for this submission are as follows: 

1. On February 22, 2007, the Court issued a Notice stating that a Further 

Case Management Conference would occur at 2:30 p.m. on March 9, 2007; and 

2. Counsel-of-Record for Roche has a concurrent hearing in a different 

courtroom that is also scheduled to begin at 2:30 p.m. on March 9, 2007. 

Based on these facts, Roche requests, with LifeScan’s concurrence, that the 

Further Case Management Conference set at 2:30 p.m. on March 9, 2007, commence at 

2:00 p.m. 

Dated: February 26, 2007 QUINN EMANUAEL URQUHART 

 OLIVER & HEDGES, LLP 

By: /s/ 

 David Eiseman 

Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant 

LifeScan, Inc. 

Dated: February 26, 2007 BINGHAM McCUTCHEN LLP 

By: /s/ 

 Thomas E. Kuhnle 

Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant 

Roche Diagnostics Corporation 

IT IS SO ORDERED: 

Dated: _______________ ________________________________________ 

The Honorable Susan Illston 

United States District Judge 

Case 3:04-cv-03653-SI Document 61 Filed 02/26/2007 Page 2 of 3
 Case 3:04-cv-03653-SI Document 62 Filed 03/02/07 Page 2 of 3
 1 

 2 

 3 

 4 

 5 

 6 

 7 

 8 

 9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

STIPULATION AND ORDER RESETTING THE TIME FOR THE FURTHER CASE MANG’T CONF 

Case No. C 04-3653 SI 

3 

PA/52156207.1

I hereby attest that I obtained concurrence in the filing of this document from 

each of the other signatories on this e-filed document. 

DATED: February 26, 2007 BINGHAM McCUTCHEN LLP 

By: /s/ 

 Thomas E. Kuhnle 

Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant 

Roche Diagnostics Corporation 

Case 3:04-cv-03653-SI Document 61 Filed 02/26/2007 Page 3 of 3
 Case 3:04-cv-03653-SI Document 62 Filed 03/02/07 Page 3 of 3