Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca10-89-03124/USCOURTS-ca10-89-03124-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Robert W. Clark
Appellant
United States of America
Appellee

Document Text:

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

TENTH CIRCUIT 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

FI LED 

United States Court of Appeals 

Tt-nth r:;'.:",,1it 

MAY 1 t 1990 

:&OBERT L. HOECKER 

Clerk 

v. 

No. 89-3124 

(D.C. No. 88-40041-01) 

(D. Kansas) 

ROBERT W. CLARK, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

ORDER AND JUDGMENT* 

Before HOLLOWAY, Chief Judge, SEYMOUR, and MOORE, Circuit Judges. 

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel 

has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially 

assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 

34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The cause is therefore ordered 

submitted without oral argument. 

Defendant Robert W. Clark appeals his conviction for driving 

under the influence on September 8, 1988. We have reviewed the 

record in light of his arguments, and we are not persuaded. 

*This order and judgment has no precedential value and shall not 

be cited, or used by any court within the Tenth Circuit, except 

for purposes of establishing the doctrines of the law of the case, 

res judicata, or collateral estoppel. 10th Cir. R. 36.3. 

Appellate Case: 89-3124 Document: 01019970098 Date Filed: 05/14/1990 Page: 1 
We affirm substantially for the reasons given by the district 

court in its Memorandum and Order dated March 31, 1989. 

-2-

Entered for the Court 

Stephanie K. Seymour 

Circuit Judge 

Appellate Case: 89-3124 Document: 01019970098 Date Filed: 05/14/1990 Page: 2