Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-06393/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-06393-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Lewis & McDermott
Defendant
Rosemary Mucklow
Plaintiff
Phil Salgado
Plaintiff

Document Text:

Plaintiffs’ Case Management Conference Statement and [Proposed] Order (Case No. C 06-06393 (THE)) 

WEINBERG, ROGER & 

ROSENFELD 

A Professional Corporation 

1001 Marina Village Parkway 

Suite 200 

Alameda, CA 94501-1091 

510.337.1001

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

BARRY E. HINKLE, Bar No. 071223 

LINDA BALDWIN JONES, Bar No. 178922 

KRISTINA M. ZINNEN, Bar No. 245346 

WEINBERG, ROGER & ROSENFELD 

A Professional Corporation 

1001 Marina Village Parkway, Suite 200 

Alameda, California 94501-1091 

Telephone 510.337.1001 

Fax 510.337.1023 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

ROSEMARY MUCKLOW; PHIL SALGADO, 

in their capacities as Trustees of the 

NORTHERN CALIFORNIA UFCW 

WHOLESALE HEALTH & WELFARE 

FUND, 

 Plaintiffs, 

 v. 

LEWIS & McDERMOTT, a California 

Corporation, 

 Defendant. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. C 06-06393 (THE) 

PLAINTIFFS’ CASE MANAGEMENT 

CONFERENCE STATEMENT AND 

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

Plaintiffs respectfully submit this Case Management Conference Statement and request that 

the Court continue the Case Management Conference set for January 22, 2007 at 1:30 p.m. and 

dates related thereto as set forth herein. 

I. STATUS OF CASE AND REQUEST FOR CONTINUANCE OF CASE 

MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

While Defendant has not responded to the Complaint which was served on December 4, 

2006, and for which Proof of Service was filed before this Court with the Summons on December 

8, 2006, Defendant has contacted Plaintiffs’ counsel and the parties have tentatively settled this 

case. Therefore, Plaintiffs respectfully request that the Court continue the initial Case 

Management Conference and dates related thereto for ninety (90) days. Plaintiffs need this 

additional time to finalize the tentative settlement and execute all necessary documents. Therefore, 

Case 3:06-cv-06393-TEH Document 5 Filed 01/12/07 Page 1 of 2
 - 2 - 

Plaintiffs’ Case Management Conference Statement and [Proposed] Order (Case No. C 06-06393 (THE)) 

WEINBERG, ROGER & 

ROSENFELD 

A Professional Corporation 

1001 Marina Village Parkway 

Suite 200 

Alameda, CA 94501-1091 

510.337.1001

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Plaintiffs respectfully request that: (1) the Initial Case Management Conference date of January 

22, 2007 and related deadlines be vacated; (2) the Initial Case Management Conference date be 

extended for ninety (90) days; and (3) related deadlines for ADR and case management activities 

are extended accordingly, as provided in the Court’s Order Setting Initial Case Management 

Conference and ADR Deadlines. 

Dated: January 9, 2007 

WEINBERG, ROGER & ROSENFELD 

A Professional Corporation 

By: /s/ Linda Baldwin Jones 

 LINDA BALDWIN JONES 

 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

Based upon the foregoing, the Court orders that: 

1. The Case Management Conference date of January 22, 2007 and related deadlines 

to case management activities and ADR be vacated; and 

2. The Case Management Conference be continued for at least 90 days to 

_______________, 2007 at 1:30 PM.

Dated: ____________________ _________________________________________ 

 THE HONORABLE THELTON E. HENDERSON, 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

112608/444595 

April 30 01/11/07

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

Judge Thelton E. Henderson

Case 3:06-cv-06393-TEH Document 5 Filed 01/12/07 Page 2 of 2