Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-03727/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-03727-2/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Alexios Kafatos
Plaintiff
Uber Technologies, Inc.
Defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ALEXIOS KAFATOS,

Plaintiff,

v.

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,

Defendant.

Case No. 15-cv-03727-JST 

SCHEDULING ORDER

The Court hereby sets the following case deadlines pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil 

Procedure 16 and Civil Local Rule 16-10:

Event Deadline

Deadline to file Initial Disclosures December 23, 2015

Deadline to add parties or amend the pleadings February 12, 2016

Plaintiff’s expert designation August 15, 2016

Defendant’s expert designation September 16, 2016

Mediation deadline October 21, 2016

Fact discovery cut-off November 29, 2016

Plaintiff’s motion for class certification January 30, 2017

Opposition to class certification February 27, 2017

Reply to class certification March 13, 2017

Case 3:15-cv-03727-JST Document 35 Filed 12/16/15 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

Event Deadline

Deadline to file dispositive motions 60 days after the order on 

class certification

Counsel may not modify these dates without leave of court. The parties shall comply with 

the Court’s standing orders, which are available at cand.uscourts.gov/jstorders.

The parties must take all necessary steps to conduct discovery, compel discovery, hire 

counsel, retain experts, and manage their calendars so that they can complete discovery in a timely 

manner and appear at trial on the noticed and scheduled dates. All counsel must arrange their 

calendars to accommodate these dates, or arrange to substitute or associate in counsel who can. 

Trial dates set by this Court should be regarded as firm. Requests for continuance are 

disfavored. The Court will not consider any event subsequently scheduled by a party, partycontrolled witness, expert or attorney that conflicts with the above trial date as good cause to grant 

a continuance. The Court will not consider the pendency of settlement discussions as good cause 

to grant a continuance. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: December 16, 2015

______________________________________

JON S. TIGAR

United States District Judge

Case 3:15-cv-03727-JST Document 35 Filed 12/16/15 Page 2 of 2