Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-01424/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-01424-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Board of Parole Hearings
Respondent
James Hodnett
Petitioner

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JAMES HODNETT,

Petitioner, No. CIV S-07-1424 LEW EFB P

vs.

BOARD OF PAROLE HEARINGS,

Respondent. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

On November 1, 2007, the court ordered petitioner to file an in forma pauperis affidavit

or pay the appropriate filing fee within 30 days and warned him that failure to do so would result

in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. 

The 30-day period has expired and petitioner has not filed a completed in forma pauperis

affidavit or paid the appropriate filing fee.

It therefore is RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice.

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty days

after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written

objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned

“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Failure to file objections 

Case 2:07-cv-01424-LEW-EFB Document 6 Filed 01/10/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Turner v.

Duncan, 158 F.3d 449, 455 (9th Cir. 1998); Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

Dated: January 10, 2008.

Case 2:07-cv-01424-LEW-EFB Document 6 Filed 01/10/08 Page 2 of 2