Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-15-07989/USCOURTS-ca4-15-07989-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
United States of America
Appellee
Roderick Arnez Whitaker
Appellant

Document Text:

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-7989

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

RODERICK ARNEZ WHITAKER, a/k/a Snoop,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Senior

District Judge. (5:09-cr-00125-BR-1)

Submitted: April 21, 2016 Decided: April 26, 2016

Before WILKINSON, KING, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Roderick Arnez Whitaker, Appellant Pro Se. Banumathi 

Rangarajan, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North 

Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 15-7989 Doc: 9 Filed: 04/26/2016 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM: 

Roderick Arnez Whitaker appeals the district court’s order 

granting his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for sentence 

reduction based on Amendment 782 to the Sentencing Guidelines. 

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, we deny Whitaker’s motion for appointment of 

counsel and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. 

See United States v. Whitaker, No. 5:09-cr-00125-BR-1 (E.D.N.C. 

Sept. 11, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the 

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid in the 

decisional process. 

AFFIRMED

Appeal: 15-7989 Doc: 9 Filed: 04/26/2016 Pg: 2 of 2