Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-15-02336/USCOURTS-ca4-15-02336-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Brenda Harris

Patti Jenkins

Maynard Massey

James Merrill

School Board of the City of Virginia Beach
Appellee
Kimberly Tucker
Appellant
Valerie Williams

Document Text:

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-2336

KIMBERLY A. TUCKER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

SCHOOL BOARD OF THE CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH,

Defendant – Appellee,

and

DR. PATTI JENKINS (individually); MAYNARD MASSEY; VALERIE 

WILLIAMS; JAMES MERRILL, Superintendent; BRENDA HARRIS,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca Beach Smith, Chief

District Judge. (2:13-cv-00530-RBS-LRL)

Submitted: February 25, 2016 Decided: February 29, 2016

Before SHEDD and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kimberly Tucker, Appellant Pro Se. Ann Katherine Sullivan, 

SULLIVAN LAW GROUP, PLC, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Appeal: 15-2336 Doc: 17 Filed: 02/29/2016 Pg: 1 of 4
2

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 15-2336 Doc: 17 Filed: 02/29/2016 Pg: 2 of 4
3

PER CURIAM:

Kimberly A. Tucker appeals from the district court’s 

judgment entered after the district court rejected the 

magistrate judge’s recommendation and granted the School Board

of the City of Virginia Beach’s summary judgment motion on 

Tucker’s employment discrimination and retaliation claims,

brought pursuant to the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended,

29 U.S.C.A. §§ 701 to 796l (West 2008 & Supp. 2015); the 

Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101 to 

12213 (2012); Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 

U.S.C. §§ 2000d to 2000d-7 (2012); and Title VII of the Civil 

Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 

(2012). Tucker has also filed an application to proceed in 

forma pauperis, as well as a motion to file attachments to her 

informal brief. 

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, although we grant Tucker’s application to proceed 

in forma pauperis, we deny Tucker’s motion to file attachments 

to her informal brief and affirm the district court’s judgment. 

See Tucker v. School Bd. VA Beach, No. 2:13-cv-00530-RBS-LRL 

(E.D. Va. Sept. 30, 2015). We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented

Appeal: 15-2336 Doc: 17 Filed: 02/29/2016 Pg: 3 of 4
4

in the materials before this court and argument would not aid 

the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Appeal: 15-2336 Doc: 17 Filed: 02/29/2016 Pg: 4 of 4