Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-07104/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-07104-2/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Carlon Properties, Inc.
Appellant
Floyd Koch
Appellee

Document Text:

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN re KOCH v. HANKINS JUDGMENT

CREDITOR TRUST, 

Debtor,

FLOYD KOCH, et al.,

 Plaintiffs

v.

EDWARD HANKINS, et al., 

Defendants

 /

No. C 06-07104 JSW

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

On October 5, 2006, Carlon Properties, Inc. (“Carlon”), filed a notice of appeal from the

decision of the Bankruptcy Court to transfer an adversary proceeding to the District of Arizona. 

Carlon also filed a motion for leave to appeal the Bankruptcy Court’s interlocutory order. On

November 16, 2006, the matter was assigned to this Court, and designated as an e-filing case. 

On April 26, 2007, the Court issued an Order to Show Cause as to why this appeal

should not be dismissed as moot, in light of the fact that the docket in the Arizona case shows

that Carlon’s motion to dismiss the petition was granted on October 24, 2006. However, it

appears that neither counsel for Carlon nor counsel for Koch ever registered with the Court’s efiling program. As a result, it was not clear to this Court that counsel were served with the

Order to Show Cause dated April 26, 2007.

Case 3:06-cv-07104-JSW Document 5 Filed 05/24/07 Page 1 of 3
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Therefore, on May 11, 2007, the Court Ordered Carlon to show cause why this appeal

should not be dismissed as moot. Carlon’s response, or a voluntary dismissal, was due by May

23, 2007. There has been no response from Carlon.

Accordingly, the pending motion for leave to appeal is DENIED and the appeal is

HEREBY DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE. A copy

of this Order shall be served on counsel for Carlon and Koch by United States Mail.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 24, 2007 

JEFFREY S. WHITE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:06-cv-07104-JSW Document 5 Filed 05/24/07 Page 2 of 3
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

FLOYD KOCH,

Plaintiff,

 v.

EDWARD J HANKINS et al,

Defendant. /

Case Number: CV06-07104 JSW 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S.

District Court, Northern District of California.

That on May 24, 2007, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by placing

said copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter listed, by

depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an inter-office

delivery receptacle located in the Clerk's office.

Andrew H. Wilson

Wilson Campilongo LLP

115 Sansome St Ste 400

San Francisco, CA 94104

Gary Steven Garfinkle

Attorney at Law

1205 Via Gabarda

Lafayette, CA 94549

Dated: May 24, 2007

Richard W. Wieking, Clerk

By: Jennifer Ottolini, Deputy Clerk

Case 3:06-cv-07104-JSW Document 5 Filed 05/24/07 Page 3 of 3