Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_20-cv-00541/USCOURTS-caed-2_20-cv-00541-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
360 Digital Marketing LLC
Defendant
Mark Aussieker
Plaintiff
Reckon Media LLC
Defendant
Salman Yousuf
Defendant

Document Text:

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

MARK AUSSIEKER, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

360 DIGITAL MARKETING, et al., 

Defendants. 

No. 2:20-cv-000541 JAM AC PS 

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 

 Plaintiff is proceeding in this action pro se. The action was accordingly referred to the 

undersigned for pretrial matters by E.D. Cal. R. (“Local Rule”) 302(c)(21). On March 11, 2020, 

plaintiff filed this action against 360 Digital Marketing LLC, Reckon Media LLC (collectively, 

“defendant organizations”) and Salman Yousuf. ECF No. 1. On March 23, 2020, defendant 

Yousuf, appearing in pro se, filed an Answer indicating that he is not affiliated with the defendant 

organizations, and asserting that his name has been used fraudulently in connection with them. 

ECF No. 5. Yousuf filed two more notices of non-affiliation. ECF Nos. 7, 8. On May 11, 2020, 

plaintiff submitted a notice of voluntary dismissal without prejudice as to defendant Yousuf only. 

ECF No. 9. The defendant organizations have not yet appeared. 

 Because defendant Yousuf filed an answer, plaintiff cannot dismiss the case against him 

without leave of court. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A). However, the undersigned has considered the 

fact that defendant Yousuf did not file any counterclaims, and has expressed his desire to be 

Case 2:20-cv-00541-JAM-AC Document 10 Filed 05/18/20 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2 

dismissed from this case to the court three times by notifying plaintiff and the court that he was 

incorrectly named. Under these circumstances, the court finds dismissal appropriate. Thus, 

pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(2), it is HEREBY RECOMMENDED that defendant Salman 

Yousuf be dismissed from this action without prejudice. 

 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 

assigned to this case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty-one 

(21) days after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written 

objections with the court. Such document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s 

Findings and Recommendations.” Local Rule 304(d). Failure to file objections within the 

specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 

F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 

DATED: May 18, 2020 

Case 2:20-cv-00541-JAM-AC Document 10 Filed 05/18/20 Page 2 of 2