Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_16-cv-02341/USCOURTS-caed-2_16-cv-02341-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Charles Lewis Bobo
Plaintiff
Fresno Rescue Mission
Defendant

Document Text:

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

CHARLES LEWIS BOBO, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

FRESNO RESCUE MISSION, 

Defendant. 

No. 2:16-cv-2341 TLN AC (PS) 

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 

 Plaintiff is proceeding in this action pro se. The action was accordingly referred to the 

undersigned for pretrial matters by E.D. Cal. R. (“Local Rule”) 302(c)(21). On October 26, 2016, 

the court dismissed the complaint, and granted plaintiff 30 days to file an amended complaint 

within 30 days. ECF No. 3. Plaintiff was cautioned that failure to do so could lead to a 

recommendation that the action be dismissed. Plaintiff has not responded to the court’s order, nor 

taken any action to prosecute this case. 

 Therefore, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed, without 

prejudice, for lack of prosecution and for failure to comply with the court’s order. See Fed. R. 

Civ. P. 41(b); Local Rule 110. 

 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 

assigned to this case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty-one 

(21) days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written 

Case 2:16-cv-02341-TLN-AC Document 4 Filed 12/12/16 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2

objections with the court. Such document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s 

Findings and Recommendations.” Local Rule 304(d). Plaintiff is advised that failure to file 

objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. 

Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 

DATED: December 12, 2016 

Case 2:16-cv-02341-TLN-AC Document 4 Filed 12/12/16 Page 2 of 2