Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-01428/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-01428-3/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
City of Vallejo
Defendant
Latasha Nicole Creer
Plaintiff
Knight
Defendant
Long
Defendant
Martinez
Defendant

Document Text:

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

LATASHA NICOLE CREER, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

CITY OF VALLEJO, et al., 

Defendants. 

No. 2:14-cv-1428 JAM DAD PS 

ORDER 

 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se with the above-entitled action. The matter was referred to a 

United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). 

 On June 17, 2015, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which 

were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the 

findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days after service of the findings 

and recommendations. The fourteen-day period has expired, and no party has filed objections to 

the findings and recommendations. 

 The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 

supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. 

 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 

 1. The findings and recommendations filed June 17, 2015 (Dkt. No. 12) are 

adopted in full; 

Case 2:14-cv-01428-JAM-DB Document 13 Filed 07/23/15 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2

 2. Defendants’ September 23, 2014 motion to dismiss (Dkt. No. 6) is granted as to 

the amended complaint’s state law battery claim against defendants Knight, Long and Martinez as 

well as with respect to the punitive damages claim against defendant City of Vallejo; 

 3. Defendants’ September 23, 2014 motion to dismiss (Dkt. No. 6) is denied in all 

other respects; and 

 4. Defendants are directed to file an answer to the amended complaint within 14 

days of the date of this order. 

DATED: July 23, 2015 

 /s/ John A. Mendez________________________ 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 

/creer1428.jo

Case 2:14-cv-01428-JAM-DB Document 13 Filed 07/23/15 Page 2 of 2