Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_13-cv-01602/USCOURTS-caed-1_13-cv-01602-3/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Gregory McClellan
Petitioner
E. Valenzuela
Respondent

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GREGORY McCLELLAN,

Petitioner,

v.

E. VALENZUELA, Warden,

Respondent.

No. 1:13-cv-01602-DAD-SKO HC

ORDER DENYING PETITIONER’S 

MOTION FOR RULING

(Doc. 23)

Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus 

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, moves for a ruling on his claims. Respondent has not filed 

opposition or consent. The matter has been referred to the Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 

U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Local Rules 302 and 303.

A court has inherent power to control its docket and the disposition of cases with economy 

of time and effort for both the court and the parties. Landis v. North American Co., 299 U.S. 248, 

251-55 (1936); Ferdik v. Bonzelet, 963 F.2d 1258, 1260 (9th Cir. 1992). Because of the large 

volume of habeas petitions and limited Court resources, the petition in this case will be addressed 

in due course.

Accordingly, Petitioner’s motion for a ruling on his petition is hereby DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 5, 2016 /s/ Sheila K. Oberto 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:13-cv-01602-DAD-SKO Document 31 Filed 01/06/16 Page 1 of 1