Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-16-06916/USCOURTS-ca4-16-06916-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Kendall Ladell Blue
Appellant
United States of America
Appellee

Document Text:

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-6916

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

KENDALL LADELL BLUE,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. James C. Dever III,

Chief District Judge. (7:11-cr-00135-D-1)

Submitted: November 22, 2016 Decided: November 28, 2016

Before DIAZ and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kendall Ladell Blue, Appellant Pro Se. Lawrence Jason Cameron, 

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Rudy E. Renfer, Assistant 

United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 16-6916 Doc: 10 Filed: 11/28/2016 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Kendall Ladell Blue appeals the district court’s order 

denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion, in which Blue 

sought a reduction of his 252-month sentence based on Amendment 

782 of the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines. We have reviewed the 

record and find no reversible error. See United States v. Mann, 

709 F.3d 301, 304 (4th Cir. 2013) (reviewing district court’s 

decision under § 3583(c)(2) for abuse of discretion). 

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district 

court. United States v. Blue, No. 7:11-cr-00135-D-1 (E.D.N.C. 

June 13, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the 

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before the court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Appeal: 16-6916 Doc: 10 Filed: 11/28/2016 Pg: 2 of 2