Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-02405/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-02405-28/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
City and County of San Francisco
Defendant
James Ellis Johnson
Plaintiff
United States of America
Defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

EUREKA DIVISION

JAMES ELLIS JOHNSON,

Plaintiff,

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al., 

Defendants.

Case No. 13-cv-02405-JD (NJV)

ORDER REQUIRING RESPONSE TO

MOTION TO COMPEL 

Re: Dkt. No. 224

On September 11, 2015, the court issued a subpoena for the production of documents to 

Newton Oldfather, Deputy City Attorney. (Doc. 189.) Plaintiff states that the subpoena was 

served on September 23, 2015. (Doc. 224.) Plaintiff claims that Deputy City Attorney Oldfather 

has produced only two photos in response to that subpoena. (Id.) Plaintiff now moves to compel 

the production of further documents. (Id.) No response to Plaintiff's motion to compel has been 

filed.

The City and County of San Francisco was once a party to this action, but was dismissed 

on June 12, 2014. (Doc. 119.) It appears that although no longer a party to this action, the City 

and County of San Francisco was electronically served with Plaintiff's motion by the Clerk's 

Office. Due to the City and County's current status as a non-party, it may have been unaware that 

the motion was directed to it. Although there is a certificate of service attached to Plaintiff's 

motion, it indicates only that the motion was served on Assistant United States Attorney Robin M. 

Wall. (Doc. 224, p. 3.) 

Accordingly, the City and County of San Francisco is HEREYB ORDERED to respond to 

Plaintiff's motion to compel (Doc. 224) no later than February 9, 2016. Plaintiff may file a reply 

Case 3:13-cv-02405-JD Document 247 Filed 01/26/16 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

to the response no later than February 16, 2016. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 26, 2016

______________________________________

NANDOR J. VADAS

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:13-cv-02405-JD Document 247 Filed 01/26/16 Page 2 of 2