Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-00529/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-00529-2/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
City of Stockton
Defendant
Jessica Glynn
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

JESSICA GLYNN, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

CITY OF STOCKTON, 

Defendant. 

Civ. No. 2:15-cv-00529-KJM-DB

FINAL PRETRIAL ORDER 

 On September 9, 2016, the court conducted a final pretrial conference. Nancy L. McCoy 

and Gary Basham appeared for plaintiff Jessica Glynn; Jesse Maddox appeared for defendant City 

of Stockton. 

 After hearing, and good cause appearing, the court makes the following findings and 

orders: 

JURISDICTION/VENUE 

 Jurisdiction is predicated on 28 U.S.C. § 1331 because this civil action arises in part under 

the laws of the United States. Plaintiff seeks redress for alleged violations of her rights pursuant 

to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e et seq., as amended (“Title VII”), 

the California Fair Employment and Housing Act, California Government Code sections 12900 

et seq. (“FEHA”), and California Labor Code section 1102.5 (“Section 1102.5”), based on 

unlawful discrimination and retaliation in employment. The court has personal jurisdiction of 

Case 2:15-cv-00529-KJM-DB Document 60 Filed 09/22/16 Page 1 of 51
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2

defendant City of Stockton, as defendant is located in this Judicial District, and venue is proper 

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b) because the alleged wrongful conduct of Defendant and the 

events giving rise to plaintiff’s claims arose in this District. Jurisdiction and venue are not 

contested. 

JURY/NON-JURY 

 Plaintiff has demanded a jury. Plaintiff has requested six (6) jurors. Defendant requested 

nine (9) jurors. The court shall empanel eight (8) jurors. 

UNDISPUTED FACTS 

1. The City of Stockton is an incorporated city in the State of California, County of 

San Joaquin, and a governmental agency. 

2. The City of Stockton City Manager’s Office created the new Office of Violence 

Prevention (“OVP”) in or about 2014. The mission of the OVP is to significantly reduce violence 

in Stockton through the implementation of violence prevention and reduction programs and 

strategies. 

3. The OVP Manager position was created in or about May 2014. 

4. Defendant City of Stockton offered the position of OVP Manager to plaintiff 

Jessica Glynn on or about September 26, 2014. 

5. Plaintiff Jessica Glynn signed defendant’s written September 26, 2014 offer of 

employment for the OVP Manager position on October 8, 2014. 

6. Plaintiff began working at the City as the OVP Manager on October 16, 2014. 

7. Defendant City of Stockton terminated plaintiff’s employment on February 13, 

2015. 

8. Plaintiff is a female individual. 

9. Defendant City of Stockton provided plaintiff a letter on February 13, 2015 that 

stated her employment status was “at will” and she was being separated based upon “an 

incompatible management style.” 

///// 

///// 

Case 2:15-cv-00529-KJM-DB Document 60 Filed 09/22/16 Page 2 of 51
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

3

DISPUTED FACTUAL ISSUES AND MIXED QUESTIONS OF LAW AND FACT 

1. Whether plaintiff Jessica Glynn was an at-will employee with defendant City of 

Stockton. 

2. Whether plaintiff Jessica Glynn’s employment as defendant’s OVP Manager was 

terminated by defendant City of Stockton for legitimate business reasons. 

3. Whether defendant City of Stockton unlawfully discriminated against plaintiff 

Jessica Glynn on the basis of gender and/or pregnancy in violation of California law (FEHA) 

when it terminated her employment on February 13, 2015. 

4. Whether defendant City of Stockton unlawfully discriminated against plaintiff 

Jessica Glynn on the basis of gender and/or pregnancy in violation of Federal law (Title VII) 

when it terminated her employment on February 13, 2015. 

5. Whether the City would have taken the same action to terminate plaintiff’s 

employment regardless of her membership in a protected category (female/pregnant). 

6. Whether plaintiff engaged in activity protected by Labor Code section 1102.5. 

7. Whether a causal connection exists between plaintiff’s alleged protected activity 

and her termination from the City. 

8. Whether defendant City of Stockton unlawfully retaliated against plaintiff Jessica 

Glynn in violation of California Labor Code section 1102.5 when defendant terminated plaintiff’s 

employment as OVP Manager on February 13, 2015. 

9. Assuming defendant City of Stockton is found liable for unlawful retaliation in 

violation of California Labor Code section 1102.5 when it terminated plaintiff’s employment on 

February 13, 2015, whether defendant can prove by clear and convincing evidence that the 

termination would have occurred for legitimate, independent reasons even if the plaintiff had not 

engaged in activities protected by section 1102.5. 

10. The nature and extent of plaintiff Jessica Glynn’s non-economic damages, past and 

future. 

11. Whether plaintiff suffered damages as a result of her termination. 

///// 

Case 2:15-cv-00529-KJM-DB Document 60 Filed 09/22/16 Page 3 of 51
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

4

12. The nature and extent of plaintiff Jessica Glynn’s economic damages, past and 

future. 

13. Whether plaintiff Jessica Glynn has adequately mitigated her damages following 

termination of employment. 

14. The nature and extent of Jessica Glynn’s efforts to mitigate her damages. 

SPECIAL FACTUAL INFORMATION 

 None applicable. 

DISPUTED EVIDENTIARY ISSUES 

Disputed evidentiary issues have been articulated in motions in limine, as described 

below. 

STIPULATIONS/AGREED STATEMENTS 

 The parties stipulate to the following: 

1. All witnesses, who are not party representatives, shall be excluded from the 

Courtroom until being excused as a witness in this case. 

2. Neither party shall mention, or introduce evidence or solicit testimony regarding 

the existence or extent of defendant City of Stockton’s Liability Insurance. 

3. The parties may use and introduce true and correct copies of exhibits, rather than 

originals, at trial. 

RELIEF SOUGHT 

1. Plaintiff seeks non-economic damages for emotional distress, past and future, in an 

amount to be determined at trial. 

2. Plaintiff seeks economic damages for wage loss and employment benefits, past 

and future, in an amount to be determined at trial. 

3. Plaintiff seeks economic damages for certain out of pocket economic losses, to be 

determined at trial. 

4. For pre-judgment and post-judgment interest. 

5. For declaratory relief including but not limited to a judicial declaration of 

defendant’s wrongdoing in violation of Title VII, FEHA, and Labor Code section 1102.5, and 

Case 2:15-cv-00529-KJM-DB Document 60 Filed 09/22/16 Page 4 of 51
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

5

injunctive relief requiring defendant to institute and enforce appropriate and lawful policies and 

practices. 

6. For recovery of attorney’s fees and costs as permitted by: 

a. Title VII (42 U.S.C. § 2000e-5(k)); 

b. FEHA (Cal. Gov’t Code section 12965(b); and 

c. California Code of Civil Procedure section 1021.5. 

POINTS OF LAW 

 The parties shall alert the court to disputes about the applicable law and legal standards. 

Trial briefs addressing these points more completely shall be filed with this court no later than 

seven days prior to the date of trial in accordance with Local Rule 285. 

ABANDONED ISSUES 

None. 

WITNESSES 

 Plaintiff’s witnesses are listed as Attachment B. 

Defendant’s witnesses are listed as Attachment C. 

Each party may call any witnesses designated by the other. 

 A. The court will not permit any other witness to testify unless: 

(1) The party offering the witness demonstrates that the witness is for the purpose 

of rebutting evidence that could not be reasonably anticipated at the pretrial 

conference, or 

(2) The witness was discovered after the pretrial conference and the proffering 

party makes the showing required in “B,” below. 

 B. Upon the post pretrial discovery of any witness a party wishes to present at trial, 

the party shall promptly inform the court and opposing parties of the existence of the unlisted 

witnesses so the court may consider whether the witnesses shall be permitted to testify at trial. 

The witnesses will not be permitted unless: 

(1) The witness could not reasonably have been discovered prior to the discovery 

cutoff; 

Case 2:15-cv-00529-KJM-DB Document 60 Filed 09/22/16 Page 5 of 51
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

6

(2) The court and opposing parties were promptly notified upon discovery of the 

witness; 

(3) If time permitted, the party proffered the witness for deposition; and 

(4) If time did not permit, a reasonable summary of the witness’s testimony was 

provided to opposing parties. 

EXHIBITS, SCHEDULES AND SUMMARIES 

 Parties’ joint exhibits are identified on Attachment A. Joint Exhibits shall be identified as 

JX and listed numerically, e.g., JX-1, JX-2. 

Plaintiff’s exhibits are identified on Attachment D. At trial, plaintiff’s exhibits shall be 

listed numerically. 

 Defendant’s exhibits are identified on Attachment E. At trial, defendant’s exhibits shall 

be listed alphabetically, first A, B, C, etc., then AA, BB, CC, etc., and so on. 

 All exhibits must be premarked. 

 The parties must prepare exhibit binders for use by the court at trial, with a side tab 

identifying each exhibit in accordance with the specifications above. Each binder shall have an 

identification label on the front and spine. 

 The parties must exchange exhibits no later than twenty-eight days before trial. Any 

objections to exhibits are due no later than fourteen days before trial. 

 A. The court will not admit exhibits other than those identified on the exhibit lists 

referenced above unless: 

1. The party proffering the exhibit demonstrates that the exhibit is for the purpose of 

rebutting evidence that could not have been reasonably anticipated, or 

2. The exhibit was discovered after the issuance of this order and the proffering party 

makes the showing required in Paragraph “B,” below. 

 B. Upon the discovery of exhibits after the discovery cutoff, a party shall promptly 

inform the court and opposing parties of the existence of such exhibits so that the court may 

consider their admissibility at trial. The exhibits will not be received unless the proffering party 

demonstrates: 

Case 2:15-cv-00529-KJM-DB Document 60 Filed 09/22/16 Page 6 of 51
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

7

1. The exhibits could not reasonably have been discovered earlier; 

2. The court and the opposing parties were promptly informed of their existence; 

3. The proffering party forwarded a copy of the exhibits (if physically possible) to the 

opposing party. If the exhibits may not be copied the proffering party must show that it has made 

the exhibits reasonably available for inspection by the opposing parties. 

DEPOSITION TRANSCRIPTS 

 Counsel must lodge the sealed original copy of any deposition transcript to be used at trial 

with the Clerk of the Court on the first day of trial. 

FURTHER DISCOVERY OR MOTIONS 

 In the parties’ joint pretrial statement, plaintiff requested that the court modify its pre-trial 

order to permit her to file and serve a supplemental expert report by Craig Enos, and to allow 

defendant to depose Mr. Enos on any new matters, should defendant desire. ECF No. 49 at 10. 

At the September 9, 2016 hearing, plaintiff indicated circumstances had changed such that she 

may no longer wish to proceed with this request. The parties shall meet and confer to determine 

how they wish to proceed and submit to the court by October 21, 2016, a stipulation and 

proposed order addressing any supplementation by Mr. Enos. If the parties are unable to agree on 

a proposal, they shall submit their respective positions in a joint statement by the same date. 

SETTLEMENT 

The court as is its practice refers the case for a court-convened settlement conference. 

Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney has been randomly selected. A settlement conference is 

scheduled before Judge Delaney for November 8, 2016 at 9:30 a.m. in Courtroom No. 24, 8th 

Floor. 

The parties are directed to submit their confidential settlement conference statements to 

the Court using the following email address: ckdorders@caed.uscourts.gov. If a party desires to 

share additional confidential information with the Court, they may do so pursuant to the 

provisions of Local Rule 270(d) and (e). Statements are due at least 7 days prior to the Settlement 

Conference. Each party is reminded of the requirement that it be represented in person at the 

///// 

Case 2:15-cv-00529-KJM-DB Document 60 Filed 09/22/16 Page 7 of 51
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

8

settlement conference by a person able to dispose of the case or fully authorized to settle the 

matter at the settlement conference on any terms. See Local Rule 270. 

Additionally, the parties are instructed to consult Judge Delaney’s standing order for 

settlement information found on the court’s website at www.caed.uscourts.gov. 

MOTIONS 

Plaintiff filed a Motion for Leave to file a First Amended Complaint on March 31, 2016, 

which Defendant did not oppose. The motion was granted, and the First Amended Complaint was 

filed on May 3, 2016. Defendant City of Stockton answered the First Amended Complaint on or 

about June 1, 2016. 

Defendant City of Stockton filed a Motion for Summary Judgment/Adjudication, which 

was heard by the Court on July 1, 2016. The Court issued an order on July 26, 2016, partially 

granting and partially denying the motion. The Court granted the motion with respect to claims 

three and four, but denied the motion with respect to the other three claims, which are proceeding 

to trial. 

MOTIONS IN LIMINE 

 The following motions are presently pending before the court: 

A. Plaintiff’s Motions in Limine

Plaintiff will file the following motions in limine: 

1. To exclude Defendant’s introduction of evidence (information or witnesses) that 

Defendant failed to provide in discovery; 

2. To exclude evidence that was either not provided at the appropriate Defendant 

PMQ depositions, or is contrary to the Defendant PMQ witnesses’ testimony; 

3. For an order binding Defendant City of Stockton to the answers given in 

deposition because their PMQ designees testified and spoke on behalf of the Defendant entity; 

4. To exclude any references or suggestions that Plaintiff was practicing law without 

the proper bar license. 

B. Defendant’s Disputed Evidentiary Issues and Motions in Limine 

Defendant City of Stockton will file motions in limine: 

Case 2:15-cv-00529-KJM-DB Document 60 Filed 09/22/16 Page 8 of 51
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

9

1. To exclude all testimony and/or opinion from non-City employees concerning 

Plaintiff’s work performance; 

2. To exclude expert testimony and evidence not included in Plaintiff’s expert 

disclosures, including any and all medical testimony about Plaintiff’s alleged emotional or 

physical distress; 

3. To exclude testimony and/or evidence about Christian Clegg’s religious beliefs; 

4. To exclude all evidence and testimony about alleged racist comments made by 

Plaintiff’s subordinates. 

5. To exclude all testimony and/or evidence about Plaintiff’s previously dismissed 

Third and Fourth Causes of Action, and the City’s previously filed Motion for Summary 

Judgment. 

6. To exclude all evidence or testimony regarding other allegations and complaints 

against the City and specifically to exclude the testimony of Michael Lam and Maria Alcazar. 

7. To exclude any evidence or testimony that Plaintiff’s employment status was 

anything other than “at will.” 

* * * 

The court shall hear arguments regarding any of the above motions the parties wish 

decided before trial on October 7, 2016. Any motion a party wants heard on that day shall be 

briefed in a maximum of five pages per motion, filed by September 28, 2016. Any opposition 

shall be filed by October 4, 2016, with replies argued at hearing. 

Each of the court’s rulings on a motion in limine will be made without prejudice and will 

be subject to proper renewal, in whole or in part, during trial. If a party wishes to contest a pretrial 

ruling, it must do so through a proper motion or objection, or otherwise forfeit appeal on such 

grounds. See FED. R. EVID. 103(a); Tennison v. Circus Circus Enters., Inc., 244 F.3d 684, 689 

(9th Cir. 2001) (“Where a district court makes a tentative in limine ruling excluding evidence, the 

exclusion of that evidence may only be challenged on appeal if the aggrieved party attempts to 

offer such evidence at trial.”) (alteration, citation and quotation omitted). In addition, challenges 

to expert testimony under Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993) 

Case 2:15-cv-00529-KJM-DB Document 60 Filed 09/22/16 Page 9 of 51
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

10

are denied without prejudice. Should a party wish to renew a Daubert challenge at trial, it should 

alert the court, at which point the court may grant limited voir dire before such expert may be 

called to testify. 

JOINT STATEMENT OF THE CASE 

Defendant City of Stockton offered plaintiff Jessica Glynn the position of Manager of its 

Office of Violence Prevention on September 26, 2014. Plaintiff accepted the position on October 

8, 2014 and started work on October 16, 2014. Plaintiff was terminated on February 13, 2015. 

Plaintiff contends she was almost nine months pregnant at the time, and asserts that her protected 

status as a pregnant woman substantially motivated defendant’s decision to terminate her 

employment. Plaintiff also asserts she made several protected complaints not long before her 

termination, and that these protected complaints motivated defendant’s decision to terminate her 

employment. 

Plaintiff contends defendant City of Stockton’s actions violated federal and state laws 

prohibiting discrimination and state law prohibiting retaliation, and claims: (1) Gender and 

Pregnancy Discrimination in Violation of Title VII; 2) Gender and Pregnancy Discrimination in 

Violation of FEHA; and 3) Retaliation in Violation of Labor Code section 1102.5. Defendant 

denies all allegations, and asserts it terminated plaintiff’s employment for legitimate, nondiscriminatory, business reasons. 

SEPARATE TRIAL OF ISSUES 

Plaintiff and Defendant do not anticipate the need for a separate trial of any of the issues 

in this matter. 

IMPARTIAL EXPERTS/LIMITATION OF EXPERTS 

 Parties agree that there is no need for an impartial expert witness. 

ATTORNEYS' FEES 

Plaintiff will be seeking attorney’s fees as prevailing party by post-trial motion, pursuant 

to Local Rule 293 and Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 54(d). 

Defendant is not seeking attorneys’ fees at this time. 

///// 

Case 2:15-cv-00529-KJM-DB Document 60 Filed 09/22/16 Page 10 of 51
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

11

ESTIMATED TIME OF TRIAL/TRIAL DATE 

 Jury trial is set for January 30, 2017 at 9:00 a.m. in Courtroom Three before the 

Honorable Kimberly J. Mueller. Trial is anticipated to last seven (7) to ten (10) days. The parties 

are directed to Judge Mueller’s trial schedule outlined on her web page on the court’s website. 

 Trial briefs are due on January 13, 2017. 

PROPOSED JURY VOIR DIRE AND PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTIONS 

 The parties shall file any proposed jury voir dire seven days before trial. Each party will 

be limited to ten minutes of jury voir dire. 

 The court directs counsel to meet and confer in an attempt to generate a joint set of jury 

instructions and verdicts. The parties shall file any such joint set of instructions fourteen days 

before trial, identified as “Jury Instructions and Verdicts Without Objection.” To the extent the 

parties are unable to agree on all or some instructions and verdicts, their respective proposed 

instructions are due fourteen days before trial. 

 Counsel shall e-mail a copy of all proposed jury instructions and verdicts, whether agreed 

or disputed, as a word document to kjmorders@caed.uscourts.gov no later than fourteen days 

before trial; all blanks in form instructions should be completed and all brackets removed. 

 Objections to proposed jury instructions must be filed seven days before trial; each 

objection shall identify the challenged instruction and shall provide a concise explanation of the 

basis for the objection along with citation of authority. When applicable, the objecting party 

shall submit an alternative proposed instruction on the issue or identify which of his or her own 

proposed instructions covers the subject. 

TRIAL PROTECTIVE ORDER 

 Defendant has indicated that it may seek a protective order regarding confidential and 

private personnel information of non-party City employees. Parties shall meet and confer so that 

defendant may determine if it is necessary to file a motion requesting a protective order, or if its 

concerns can be otherwise addressed. 

///// 

///// 

Case 2:15-cv-00529-KJM-DB Document 60 Filed 09/22/16 Page 11 of 51
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

12

MISCELLANEOUS 

 Plaintiff filed a notice of motion for sanctions and attorney’s fees. The motion hearing is 

scheduled for October 7, 2016. 

OBJECTIONS TO PRETRIAL ORDER 

 Each party is granted fourteen days from the date of this order to file objections to the 

same. If no objections are filed, the order will become final without further order of this court. 

DATED: September 21, 2016. 

 

Case 2:15-cv-00529-KJM-DB Document 60 Filed 09/22/16 Page 12 of 51
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

13

Attachment A: Joint Exhibits 

Joint 

Exh. 

No. 

Document Description Bates-Stamp No. 

1. City of Stockton, California, City Manager 

Administrative Directive- HR - 15 - 

Discrimination and Harassment Policy, (March, 

2010) 

Exhibit 13 to Plaintiff Jessica 

Glynn’s Deposition (Not BatesStamped) 

2. Operation Peacekeeper Program Policies and 

Procedures (Created January 2008 (4th Revision 

Effective May 15, 2013) 

008473-008484 

3. Comprehensive Summary of City of Stockton 

Unrepresented Management/Confidential and 

Law Employees Compensation Plan (July 1, 

2014) 

000082-000113 

 

Case 2:15-cv-00529-KJM-DB Document 60 Filed 09/22/16 Page 13 of 51
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

14

Attachment B: Plaintiff’s Witness List 

Witness Name And 

Address 

Brief Statement Of The Nature Of The Testimony 

To Be Proffered. 

Testimony 

Form – In 

Person/ By 

Deposition; 

Expert/Non 

1. Jessica Glynn Plaintiff Jessica Glynn is expected to testify about her 

skills and qualifications; job duties, job history, job 

performance and separation of employment with 

Defendant City of Stockton (“Defendant”); her 

interactions and communications with Christian Clegg, 

Kurt Wilson, Ken Praegitzer, other managers, 

coworkers, program partners, and third parties in 

connection with her work for Defendant City of 

Stockton; and facts and events supporting her legal 

claims and theories in this action. 

Plaintiff is also expected to testify regarding her job 

search efforts and mitigation and damages issues. 

Non-expert; In 

person. 

2. Christian 

Clegg/City of 

Stockton, 

Assistant to 

City Manager 

Christian Clegg, the Assistant to the City Manager for 

Defendant, and Plaintiff’s former supervisor and 

decision maker, is expected to testify about the 

creation, development, staffing and structure of 

Defendant’s Office of Violence Prevention (“OVP”). 

Christian Clegg is also expected to testify as to the 

recruitment, interview, screening and selection process 

for Defendant’s OVP Manager in 2015; and 

Defendant’s job offer to Plaintiff. 

Christian Clegg is also expected to testify as to 

Plaintiff’s job performance during her employment 

with Defendant, including appraisals/ evaluations/ 

feedback; lack of discipline, warnings, counseling or 

negative feedback; his related communications with 

third persons; Plaintiff and Christian Clegg’s October 

8, 2014 meeting and the February 13, 2015 termination 

meeting. 

Christian Clegg is also expected to testify as to 

Defendant’s plan, intent and decision to terminate 

Plaintiff’s employment, and the reasons therefore. 

Christian Clegg is also expected to testify about 

communications with the OVP staff as to the reasons 

for Plaintiff's separation of employment, including 

statements made at a staff meeting on or about 

February 17, 2015. 

Non-expert; In 

person and by 

deposition 

(PMQ 

deposition 

testimony 

excerpts) 

Case 2:15-cv-00529-KJM-DB Document 60 Filed 09/22/16 Page 14 of 51
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

15

Christian Clegg is also expected to testify about 

Defendant’s policies, practices and procedures 

regarding payment of overtime to its Peacekeepers, 

Youth Outreach Workers and/or Outreach Workers. 

This includes any changes or modifications to 

Defendant’s policies, practices and procedures 

regarding payment of overtime for its Peacekeepers, 

Youth Outreach Workers and/or Outreach Workers. 

Christian Clegg is also expected to testify about 

concerns and complaints to Defendant concerning 

FLSA/wage and hour compliance issues of the 

Peacekeepers; Defendant’s failure to properly 

compensate Peacekeepers for overtime; and 

remedial/corrective steps by Defendant to address 

violations. 

Christian Clegg is also expected to testify about 

concerns and complaints to Defendant concerning 

potential constitutional due process violations arising 

from Defendant’s information sharing practices and 

procedures between Defendant’s Police Department 

and Peacekeeper staff. 

Christian Clegg is also expected to testify about his 

communications regarding Plaintiff’s pregnancy, 

anticipated pregnancy disability leave, maternity leave 

and plans to cover Plaintiff’s job duties while she was 

on leave. 

Christian Clegg is also expected to testify about 

Defendant’s policies, practices and procedures 

regarding employee use of personal cell phones, text 

messages and email for business/work use. 

3. Kurt Wilson, 

City of 

Stockton, 

City Manager 

Kurt Wilson is expected to testify regarding: Wilson’s 

job interview with Plaintiff on or about September 25, 

2014; Wilson’s verbal and written communications 

with Plaintiff on September 26, 2014; Wilson’s 

meeting with Plaintiff on or about October 2, 2014; 

Defendant’s selection of Plaintiff for the OVP Manager 

position; Wilson’s meeting with Plaintiff and Christian 

Clegg on or about October 21, 2014; Defendant’s 

decision to terminate Plaintiff’s employment and 

Defendant’s termination meeting with Plaintiff on 

February 13, 2015. 

Non-expert; In 

person and by 

deposition 

(PMQ 

deposition 

testimony 

excerpts) 

4. Laurie 

Montes/City 

of Stockton, 

Deputy City 

Manager 

Laurie Montes is expected to testify regarding 

Defendant’s policies, practices and procedures 

regarding timekeeping and compensation of its 

Peacekeepers, Youth Outreach Workers and Outreach 

Workers; including the calculation of payment of 

Non-expert; In 

person and by 

deposition 

(PMQ 

deposition 

Case 2:15-cv-00529-KJM-DB Document 60 Filed 09/22/16 Page 15 of 51
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

16

 overtime or “Comp. Time;” and Defendant’s “Flex 

Time” compensation practice. 

Laurie Montes is also expected to testify regarding 

communications between Plaintiff and Laurie Montes 

regarding Defendant’s timekeeping and compensation 

practices of the peacekeepers; prior FLSA noncompliant pay practices under former Program 

manager Ralph Womack and Plaintiff’s concerns and 

complaints regarding non-compliant FLSA/wage and 

hour practices. 

Laurie Montes is also expected to testify regarding her 

one meeting with Plaintiff that occurred on or about 

December 4, 2014. 

testimony 

excerpts) 

5. Ken 

Praegitzer,/ 

City of 

Stockton, 

former 

Program 

Manager, 

Operation 

Peacekeeper 

Ken Praegitzer is expected to testify regarding 

Defendant’s Operation Peacekeepers Program policies, 

procedures and practices. 

Ken Praegitzer is also expected to testify regarding 

Defendant’s policies, practices and procedures 

regarding timekeeping and compensation of its 

Peacekeepers, Youth Outreach Workers and Outreach 

Workers; including the calculation of payment of 

overtime or “Comp. Time;” and Defendant’s “Flex 

Time” compensation practice. 

Ken Praegitzer is also expected to testify regarding 

expectations and requirements of the Peacekeepers 

with regard to working outside of scheduled hours, 

including being on call. 

Ken Praegitzer is also expected to testify regarding the 

FLSA non-compliant compensation practices of the 

Peacekeepers under his management. 

Ken Praegitzer is also expected to testify regarding 

regular “Core Group” meetings which included the 

Peacekeepers and City of Stockton Police Officers/ 

Gang Unit detectives; and the information sharing 

policies and practices between the two groups; and 

Plaintiff’s directives to halt the Core Group meetings in 

about November, 2014 light of her legal concerns. 

Ken Praegitzer is also expected to testify regarding 

communications with Plaintiff and other persons 

Non-expert; In 

person and by 

deposition 

(PMQ 

deposition 

testimony 

excerpts) 

Case 2:15-cv-00529-KJM-DB Document 60 Filed 09/22/16 Page 16 of 51
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

17

regarding Plaintiff’s inquiries, concerns and complaints 

regarding Peacekeeper timekeeping and compensation 

practices. 

Ken Praegitzer is also expected to testify regarding 

communications with Plaintiff and other persons 

regarding Plaintiff’s inquiries, concerns and complaints 

regarding information sharing policies and practices 

between Defendant’s Police Department and the 

Peacekeepers/Outreach Workers. 

Ken Praegitzer is also expected to testify regarding the 

history of , and his observations of, Peacekeeper team 

dynamics, including supervisor Jose Gomez skills, 

abilities, weaknesses and job performance; and 

Praegitzer’s opinions and recommendations. 

Ken Praegitzer’s plans and intentions regarding 

retirement/departure from his job as Defendant’s 

Peacekeeper Program Manager and communications 

with other persons as to same. 

6. Trevor 

Womack, 

City of 

Stockton 

Police 

Department, 

Deputy Chief 

of Police 

Trevor Womack is expected to testify regarding the 

regular “Core Group” meetings which included the 

Peacekeepers and Defendant’s Police Officers/ Gang 

Unit detectives; and the information sharing policies 

and practices between the two groups; and Plaintiff’s 

directives to halt the Core Group meetings in light of 

her legal concerns. 

Trevor Womack is also expected to testify regarding 

communications with Plaintiff and other persons 

regarding Plaintiff’s inquiries, concerns and complaints 

regarding information sharing policies and practices 

between Defendant’s Police Department and the 

Peacekeepers/Outreach Workers; and Plaintiff’s 

concerns or complaints to concerning these practices 

might constitute constitutional/ due process violations. 

Trevor Womack is also expected to testify regarding 

his verbal communications with Plaintiff about Alicia 

Duer made at the February 12, 2015 Cease Fire call in. 

Non-expert; In 

person and by 

deposition 

(PMQ 

deposition 

testimony 

excerpts) 

7. Marci 

Arredondo/ 

City of 

Stockton, 

Attorney Arredondo is expected to testify about 

Plaintiff’s expressed concerns and complaints about 

Defendant’s wage and hour and compensation practices 

of the Peacekeepers; and communications with Plaintiff 

Non-expert; In 

person. 

Case 2:15-cv-00529-KJM-DB Document 60 Filed 09/22/16 Page 17 of 51
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

18

Deputy City 

Attorney 

and others regarding same. 

8. Neal 

Lutterman, 

former City 

of Stockton, 

Deputy City 

Attorney 

Wilke Fleury 

400 Capitol 

Mall, 22nd Fl. 

Sacramento 

CA 95814 

916.441.2430 

Attorney Lutterman is expected to testify about 

Plaintiff’s expressed concerns and complaints about 

legal/ constitutional due process and wage and hourrelated concerns/complaints; and communications with 

Plaintiff and others regarding same. 

Non-expert; in 

person 

9. DeAnna 

Solina/City 

of Stockton, 

Director of 

Human 

Resources 

DeAnna Solina is expected to testify regarding 

Defendant’s policies, practices and procedures 

regarding timekeeping and compensation of its 

Peacekeepers, Youth Outreach Workers and Outreach 

Workers; including the calculation of payment of 

overtime or “Comp. Time;” and Defendant’s “Flex 

Time” compensation practice. 

DeAnna Solina is expected to testify regarding 

communications and meetings with Plaintiff and other 

persons regarding Plaintiff’s inquiries, concerns and 

complaints regarding Defendant’s timekeeping and 

compensation practices, and other wage and hourrelated issues, for its Peacekeepers, Youth Outreach 

Workers and Outreach Workers. 

DeAnna Solina is also expected to testify regarding 

changes to Defendant’s policies, practices and 

procedures regarding timekeeping and compensation of 

its Peacekeepers, Youth Outreach Workers and 

Outreach Workers; including the calculation of 

payment of overtime or “Comp. Time;” and 

Defendant’s “Flex Time” compensation practice. 

Non-expert; In 

person and by 

deposition 

(PMQ 

deposition 

testimony 

excerpts) 

10. Stephanie 

van Steyn, 

City of 

Stockton, 

Supervising 

Human 

Stephanie van Steyn is expected to testify regarding 

Defendant’s policies, practices and procedures 

regarding employee discipline; and employee 

performance monitoring or improvement. 

Stephanie van Steyn is expected to testify regarding 

In person; nonexpert 

Case 2:15-cv-00529-KJM-DB Document 60 Filed 09/22/16 Page 18 of 51
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

19

Resources 

Analyst at 

City of 

Stockton 

Defendant’s policies, practices and procedures 

regarding “comp time” for the time period January 1, 

2012 to present. This includes any changes or 

modifications to Defendant’s policies, practices or 

procedures regarding “comp time” for the time period 

January 1, 2012 to present. 

Stephanie van Steyn is also expected to testify 

regarding documentation related to the termination of 

Plaintiff's employment. 

 

Case 2:15-cv-00529-KJM-DB Document 60 Filed 09/22/16 Page 19 of 51
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

20

11. Jaime 

Constantino, 

City of 

Stockton 

/Youth 

Outreach 

Worker 

Jaime Constantino is expected to testify regarding the 

implementation and history of the Operation 

Peacekeeper; and its program policies, procedures, and 

practices. 

Jaime Constantino is also expected to testify regarding 

City of Stockton Peacekeeper/police information 

sharing practices; and complaints and concerns raised 

by regarding information sharing practices. 

Jaime Constantino is also expected to testify regarding 

City of Stockton Peacekeeper program team history – 

tension, morale and team dynamic; and further as to the 

OVP staffing structure, organization, changes and 

potential changes; and discussions with Plaintiff Jessica 

Glynn as to same. 

Jaime Constantino is also expected to testify regarding 

events of November 20, 2014 including the staff 

meeting in which then-supervisor Jose Gomez went 

ballistic. 

Jaime Constantino is also expected to testify regarding 

Jose Gomez’s and Jaime Constantino complaints about 

Plaintiff; and about other claims of harassment, 

discrimination and/or retaliation, and wage and hour 

compliance issues among the Peacekeepers. 

Jaime Constantino is also expected to testify regarding 

Plaintiff Jessica Glynn’s concerns and legal issues 

(including her constitutional due process concerns with 

the information sharing practices between the 

Peacekeepers and police officers/gang unit detectives, 

including the practice of regular “Core Group 

meetings” OVP/Ceasefire model; and 

Plaintiff’s concerns and legal issues relating to wage 

and hour issues, including Flex time, Comp. time, 

overtime, timekeeping and recordkeeping procedures. 

Jaime Constantino is also expected to testify regarding 

the history and changes to Flex Time, Overtime, and 

Comp time pay policies, practices and procedures of 

Peacekeepers. 

In person; nonexpert 

Case 2:15-cv-00529-KJM-DB Document 60 Filed 09/22/16 Page 20 of 51
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

21

12. Pheakday 

Youn/ City 

of Stockton 

/former 

Youth 

Outreach 

Worker 

Pheakday Youn is expected to testify regarding the 

implementation and history of the Operation 

Peacekeeper; and its program policies, procedures, and 

practices. 

Pheakday Youn is also expected to testify regarding 

City of Stockton Peacekeeper/police information 

sharing practices; and complaints and concerns raised 

by City of Stockton Peacekeepers regarding 

information sharing practices. 

Pheakday Youn is also expected to testify regarding 

City of Stockton Peacekeeper program team history – 

tension, morale and team dynamic; and further as to the 

OVP staffing structure, organization, changes and 

potential changes; and discussions with Plaintiff Jessica 

Glynn as to same. 

Pheakday Youn is also expected to testify regarding 

events of November 20, 2014 including the staff 

meeting in which Supervisor Jose Gomez went 

ballistic. 

Pheakday Youn is also expected to testify regarding 

other claims of harassment, discrimination, retaliation, 

and bullying among the Peacekeepers. 

Pheakday Youn is also expected to testify regarding 

Plaintiff Jessica Glynn’s duties, management style, and 

job performance as the OVP Manager. 

Pheakday Youn is also expected to testify regarding 

Plaintiff Jessica Glynn’s concerns and legal issues 

(including her constitutional due process concerns with 

the information sharing practices between the 

Peacekeepers and police officers/gang unit detectives, 

including the practice of regular “Gore Group 

meetings” OVP/Ceasefire model; and 

Plaintiff’s concerns and legal issues relating to wage 

and hour issues, including Flex time, Comp. time, 

overtime, timekeeping and recordkeeping procedures. 

Pheakday Youn is also expected to testify regarding the 

history and changes to Flex Time, Overtime, and Comp 

time pay policies, practices and procedures of 

Peacekeepers. 

In person; nonexpert 

Case 2:15-cv-00529-KJM-DB Document 60 Filed 09/22/16 Page 21 of 51
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

22

Pheakday Youn is also expected to testify regarding 

Defendant Peacekeepers’ reputation as snitches in 

Stockton communities; and Peacekeepers Jose Gomez 

and Jaime Constantino’s specific reputations as 

snitches in Stockton communities. 

Pheakday Youn is also expected to testify regarding 

communications by Christian Clegg regarding reasons 

for Plaintiff Jessica Glynn’s separation of employment. 

13. Stanley 

Thomas City 

of Stockton 

/Youth 

Outreach 

Worker 

Stanley Thomas is expected to testify regarding the 

implementation and history of the Operation 

Peacekeeper; and its program policies, procedures, and 

practices. 

Stanley Thomas is also expected to testify regarding 

City of Stockton Peacekeeper/police information 

sharing practices; and complaints and concerns raised 

by City of Stockton Peacekeepers regarding 

information sharing practices. 

Stanley Thomas is also expected to testify regarding 

City of Stockton Peacekeeper program team history – 

tension, morale and team dynamic; and further as to the 

OVP staffing structure, organization, changes and 

potential changes; and discussions with Plaintiff Jessica 

Glynn as to same. 

Stanley Thomas is also expected to testify regarding 

events of November 20, 2014 including the staff 

meeting in which Supervisor Jose Gomez went 

ballistic. 

Stanley Thomas is also expected to testify regarding 

other claims of harassment, discrimination, retaliation, 

and bullying among the Peacekeepers. 

Stanley Thomas is also expected to testify regarding 

Plaintiff Jessica Glynn’s duties, management style, and 

job performance as the OVP Manager. 

Stanley Thomas is also expected to testify regarding 

Plaintiff Jessica Glynn’s concerns and legal issues 

(including her constitutional due process concerns with 

the information sharing practices between the 

Peacekeepers and police officers/gang unit detectives, 

including the practice of regular “Core Group 

In person; nonexpert 

Case 2:15-cv-00529-KJM-DB Document 60 Filed 09/22/16 Page 22 of 51
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

23

meetings” OVP/Ceasefire model; and 

Plaintiff’s concerns and legal issues relating to wage 

and hour issues, including Flex time, Comp. time, 

overtime, timekeeping and recordkeeping procedures. 

Stanley Thomas is also expected to testify regarding 

the history and changes to Flex Time, Overtime, and 

Comp time pay policies, practices and procedures of 

Peacekeepers. 

Stanley Thomas is also expected to testify regarding 

Defendant Peacekeepers’ reputation as snitches in 

Stockton communities; and Peacekeepers Jose Gomez 

and Jaime Constantino’s specific reputations as 

snitches in Stockton communities 

Stanley Thomas is also expected to testify regarding 

communications by Christian Clegg regarding reasons 

for Plaintiff Jessica Glynn’s separation of employment. 

14. Jose Gomez, 

City of 

Stockton 

/Youth 

Outreach 

Worker 

Jose Gomez is expected to testify regarding the 

implementation and history of the Operation 

Peacekeeper; and its program policies, procedures, and 

practices. 

Jose Gomez is also expected to testify regarding City 

of Stockton Peacekeeper/police information sharing 

practices; and complaints and concerns raised by City 

of Stockton Peacekeepers regarding information 

sharing practices. 

Jose Gomez is also expected to testify regarding City 

of Stockton Peacekeeper program team history – 

tension, morale and team dynamic; and further as to the 

OVP staffing structure, organization, changes and 

potential changes; and discussions with Plaintiff Jessica 

Glynn as to same. 

Jose Gomez is also expected to testify regarding events 

of November 20, 2014 including the staff meeting in 

which Jose Gomez went ballistic. 

Jose Gomez is also expected to testify regarding Jose 

Gomez’s and Jose Gomez complaints about Plaintiff; 

and about other claims of harassment, discrimination 

and/or retaliation, and wage and hour compliance 

issues among the Peacekeepers. 

In person; nonexpert 

Case 2:15-cv-00529-KJM-DB Document 60 Filed 09/22/16 Page 23 of 51
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

24

Jose Gomez is also expected to testify regarding 

Plaintiff Jessica Glynn’s duties, management style, and 

job performance as the OVP Manager; and about the 

reasons communicated to the Peacekeepers by 

Christian Clegg for Plaintiff Jessica Glynn’s separation 

of employment. 

Jose Gomez is also expected to testify regarding OVP 

staffing structure, organization, changes and potential 

changes; and discussions with Plaintiff Jessica Glynn 

as to same. 

Jose Gomez is also expected to testify regarding 

Plaintiff’s concerns and legal issues relating to wage 

and hour issues, including Flex time, Comp. time, 

overtime, timekeeping and recordkeeping procedures; 

and communications with City of Stockton including 

Human Resources regarding unpaid wages issues, and 

changes to Peacekeeper timekeeping and pay practices 

including abolishing “Flex Time” and implementing 

Comp. time pay practices. 

15. Ernest Bass/ 

City of 

Stockton 

/Youth 

Outreach 

Worker 

Ernest Bass is expected to testify regarding the 

implementation and history of the Operation 

Peacekeeper; and its program policies, procedures, and 

practices. 

Ernest Bass is also expected to testify regarding City of 

Stockton Peacekeeper/police information sharing 

practices; and complaints and concerns raised by City 

of Stockton Peacekeepers regarding information 

sharing practices. 

Ernest Bass is also expected to testify regarding City of 

Stockton Peacekeeper program team history – tension, 

morale and team dynamic; and further as to the OVP 

staffing structure, organization, changes and potential 

changes; and discussions with Plaintiff Jessica Glynn 

as to same. 

Ernest Bass is also expected to testify regarding events 

of November 20, 2014 including the staff meeting in 

which Jose Gomez went ballistic. 

Ernest Bass is also expected to testify regarding other 

claims of harassment, discrimination, retaliation, and 

bullying among the Peacekeepers. 

In person; nonexpert 

Case 2:15-cv-00529-KJM-DB Document 60 Filed 09/22/16 Page 24 of 51
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

25

Ernest Bass is also expected to testify regarding 

Plaintiff Jessica Glynn’s duties, management style, and 

job performance as the OVP Manager. 

Ernest Bass is also expected to testify regarding 

Plaintiff Jessica Glynn’s concerns and legal issues 

(including her constitutional due process concerns with 

the information sharing practices between the 

Peacekeepers and police officers/gang unit detectives, 

including the practice of regular “core group meetings” 

OVP/Ceasefire model; and Plaintiff’s concerns and 

legal issues relating to wage and hour issues, including 

Flex time, Comp. time, overtime, timekeeping and 

recordkeeping procedures. 

Ernest Bass is also expected to testify regarding the 

history and changes to Flex Time, Overtime, and Comp 

time pay policies, practices and procedures of 

Peacekeepers. 

Ernest Bass is also expected to testify regarding 

Defendant Peacekeepers’ reputation as snitches in 

Stockton communities; and Peacekeepers Jose Gomez 

and Jaime Constantino’s specific reputations as 

snitches in Stockton communities. 

Ernest Bass is also expected to testify regarding 

communications by Christian Clegg regarding reasons 

for Plaintiff Jessica Glynn’s separation of employment. 

16. Matt Lam 

City of 

Stockton 

/former 

Youth 

Outreach 

Worker 

Matt Lam is expected to testify regarding the 

implementation and history of the Operation 

Peacekeeper; and its program policies, procedures, and 

practices. 

Matt Lam is also expected to testify regarding City of 

Stockton Peacekeeper/police information sharing 

practices; and complaints and concerns raised by City 

of Stockton Peacekeepers regarding information 

sharing practices. 

Matt Lam is also expected to testify regarding City of 

Stockton Peacekeeper program team history – tension, 

morale and team dynamic. 

Matt Lam is also expected to testify regarding other 

By deposition 

transcript; nonexpert 

Case 2:15-cv-00529-KJM-DB Document 60 Filed 09/22/16 Page 25 of 51
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

26

claims of harassment, discrimination, retaliation, 

bullying; including his own concerns and complaints 

about information sharing expectations, bullying and 

retaliation. 

Matt Lam is also expected to testify regarding his 

concerns and complaints about the information sharing 

practices between the Peacekeepers and police 

officers/gang unit detectives, including the practice of 

regular “core group meetings”; and the expectations of 

his supervisors Jose Gomez and Ralph Womack as to 

same. 

Matt Lam is also expected to testify regarding 

Defendant Peacekeepers’ reputation as snitches in 

Stockton communities; and Peacekeepers Jose Gomez 

and Jaime Constantino’s specific reputations as 

snitches in Stockton communities 

17. Savong 

Lam/Former 

Director, 

Neighborhoo

d-based 

programs, of 

Community 

Partnership 

For Families 

Of San 

Joaquin. 

Savong Lam is expected to testify regarding her 

interactions and observations of Jessica Glynn during 

Plaintiff’s employment with Defendant. 

She is also expected to testify regarding the 

Peacekeeper program generally, and Jose Gomez’ 

reputation specifically, as snitches. 

Ms. Lam is also expected to testify about concerns over 

the safety of her husband/former Peacekeeper Matt 

Lam and their four children, arising from the 

inappropriate information sharing practices and 

community perception of Defendant’s Peacekeepers as 

mere snitches. 

By deposition 

transcript; nonexpert 

18. Karen Costa, 

City of 

Stockton, 

Executive 

Assistant to 

City Manager 

Ms. Costa is expected to testify regarding 

communications with Plaintiff, City Manager Kurt 

Wilson, and Human Resources Director DeAnna 

Solina regarding Plaintiff’s requested appointments, 

meetings and calls. 

In person; nonexpert 

19. Alicia Duer, 

Program 

Manager III 

at City of 

Stockton 

Alicia Duer is expected to testify regarding her role and 

responsibilities regarding grants generally, and with 

regard to grants related to the Peacekeeper program 

specifically; and as to Florence Low’s role and 

responsibilities regarding grants generally, and with 

regard to grants related to the Peacekeeper program. 

In person; nonexpert 

Case 2:15-cv-00529-KJM-DB Document 60 Filed 09/22/16 Page 26 of 51
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

27

Alicia Duer is also expected to testify regarding her 

communications with Plaintiff regarding concerns 

about Peacekeeper compensation practices. 

Alicia Duer is also expected to testify regarding her 

communications with Plaintiff on October 21, 2014. 

Alicia Duer is expected to testify regarding 

the BHS grant history; communications about the BHS 

grant application process and changes thereto, 

including communications with Frances Hutchins, 

Florence Low, Christian Clegg, Ken Praegitzer and 

Plaintiff. 

20. Florence 

Low 

Florence Low is expected to testify regarding her role 

and responsibilities regarding grants generally, and 

with regard to grants related to the Peacekeeper 

program specifically. 

Florence Low is also expected to testify regarding her 

communications with Plaintiff and others regarding 

BHS grant application issues. 

In person; nonexpert 

21. San Joaquin 

County 

Board of 

Supervisors, 

Custodian of 

Records 

A San Joaquin County Board of Supervisors, Custodian 

of Records witness is expected to testify regarding the 

San Joaquin County Board of Supervisors Resolution; 

and authentication of the new Three Year MHSA Plan. 

In person; nonexpert 

22. Tom AmatoExecutive 

Director of 

PACT 

Tom Amato is expected to testify regarding his 

interactions and experiences with Jessica Glynn during 

her employment; and communications with Defendant 

following Plaintiff’s termination. 

In person; nonexpert 

23. Gretchen 

Newby/ 

Friends 

Outside 

Executive 

Director 

Gretchen Newby is expected to testify regarding her 

interactions and experiences with Jessica Glynn during 

her employment; and communications with Plaintiff’s 

termination before and after Plaintiff’s termination; and 

as to Ms. Newby’s own observations and feedback 

regarding Plaintiff’s preparation, organization and 

performance at the February 11, 2015 Call-In rehearsal 

and February 12, 2015 Call-In event. 

In person; nonexpert 

24. Robina 

Asghar, 

Community 

Robina Asghar is expected to testify regarding her 

interactions and experiences with Jessica Glynn during 

her employment; and communications with Plaintiff’s 

In person; nonexpert 

Case 2:15-cv-00529-KJM-DB Document 60 Filed 09/22/16 Page 27 of 51
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

28

Partnership 

For Families 

Of San 

Joaquin, 

Executive 

Director 

before termination. 

She is also expected to testify regarding the 

Peacekeeper program generally, and Jose Gomez’ 

reputation specifically, as snitches. 

25. Michael 

Tubbs, 

former 

Stockton City 

Councilman 

and Mayor 

candidate 

Michael Tubbs is expected to testify regarding 

Plaintiff’s job duties, job performance and separation 

of employment with Defendant; interactions and 

communications with Plaintiff and others including 

Christian Clegg, Kurt Wilson, Ken Praegitzer, other 

City of Stockton managers, coworkers, program 

partners, and other third parties in connection with 

Plaintiff’s work for Defendant. 

In person; nonexpert 

26. Debra Glynn, 

Plaintiff’s 

mother 

Debra Glynn is expected to testify regarding her 

interactions and observations of Plaintiff Jessica Glynn; 

and as to Plaintiff’s damages. 

In person; nonexpert 

27. Santiago 

Salinas, 

Plaintiff’s 

husband 

Santiago Salinas is expected to testify regarding his 

observations of Plaintiff Jessica Glynn; and as to 

Plaintiff’s damages. 

In person; nonexpert 

28. Craig Enos Mr. Enos is a forensic accountant, and will be 

providing expert testimony regarding Plaintiff’s 

economic damages and wage loss. 

In-person; 

expert 

 

Case 2:15-cv-00529-KJM-DB Document 60 Filed 09/22/16 Page 28 of 51
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

29

Attachment C: Defendant’s Witness List 

1. Kurt Wilson: Wilson is City of Stockton City Manager. Wilson will testify about 

Plaintiff’s hiring, work performance, and ultimate termination. Wilson will testify about the 

City’s process in hiring and terminating management-level employees. Wilson may also testify 

about creation of the Office of Violence and Prevention (“OVP”), creation of the OVP Manager 

position, and the process of hiring a new Manager for the OVP. 

2. Christian Clegg: Clegg is the Assistant to the City Manager/Deputy City Manager. He 

directly supervised Plaintiff and will testify about his communications with her during her 

employment. Clegg will testify about Plaintiff’s hiring, work performance, and ultimate 

termination. Clegg may also testify about the OVP, its mission, goals, and duties. Clegg may also 

testify about the City’s Operation Peacekeeper and Ceasefire programs. 

3. Jose Gomez: Gomez was one of Plaintiff’s direct reports. He will testify about Plaintiff’s 

duties and work performance. Gomez will also testify about his interactions with Plaintiff during 

her employment as well as Plaintiff’s interactions with other City employees. 

4. Alicia Duer: Duer was an employee in the City Manager’s Office. She will testify about 

her interactions with Plaintiff and the City’s grants programs. She may also testify about her 

experiences as a female employee in the City Manager’s Office and obtaining grant funding. 

5. Ken Praegitzer: Praegitzer will testify about his interactions and experiences with 

Plaintiff. Praegitzer may also testify about the mission, goals, and duties of the OVP, Operation 

Peacekeeper, and Operation Ceasefire. 

6. Jaime Constantino: Constantino is an employee in the OVP. He will testify about his 

experiences and communications with Plaintiff. Constantino may also testify about the 

responsibilities of the City’s Peacekeepers/Outreach Workers. 

7. Florence Low: Low is an employee in the City Manager’s Office. She will testify about 

her communications with Plaintiff and about the City’s grants program. She may also testify 

about her experiences as a female employee in the City Manager’s Office. 

8. Debbie Shipp: Shipp is an employee in the City’s Human Resources Office. She will 

testify about the City’s hiring and recruitment process as well as the creation of new City 

Case 2:15-cv-00529-KJM-DB Document 60 Filed 09/22/16 Page 29 of 51
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

30

positions. Shipp will also testify about the City’s civil service and classification rules. Shipp will 

also testify about her communications and interactions with the Plaintiff during her employment. 

9. Chief of Police Eric Jones: Chief Jones will testify about Operation Peacekeeper and 

Operation Ceasefire as well as his communications and interactions with the Plaintiff during her 

employment with the City. 

10. City Council Member Moses Zapian: Councilmember Zapian will testify about his 

interactions and communications with Plaintiff during her employment with the City. 

11. Deputy Chief of Police Trevor Womack: Deputy Chief Womack will testify about the 

Operation Peacekeeper and Operation Ceasefire programs as well as his communications and 

interactions with the Plaintiff. 

12. Stephanie Van Steyn: Van Steyn is an employee in the City’s Human Resources 

Department. She will testify about the City’s Civil Service and classification rules, and her 

communications and interactions with Plaintiff during her employment with the City. Van Steyn 

may also testify about the City’s personnel rules and policies. 

13. DeAnna Solina: Solina is the Director of Human Resources for the City. Solina will testify 

about her communications and interactions with Plaintiff during her employment with the City. 

Solina may also testify the City’s practices, training, and hiring and separation procedures, as well 

as the City’s civil service and classification rules and the City’s personnel rules and policies. 

Solina may also testify regarding the City’s practice with respect to, and history of, 

accommodating pregnant employees. 

14. Laurie Montes: Montes is the Executive Assistant to the City Manager/Deputy City 

Manager. Montes will testify about her communications and interactions with Plaintiff while she 

was employed by the City. Montes may also testify about the City’s civil service and 

classification rules as well as the City’s personnel rules and policies. She may also testify about 

her experiences as a female employee in the City Manager’s Office, her experience with wage 

and hour practices of Peacekeepers, and experience with grant funding at the City. 

15. Earnest Bass: Bass is an employee of the Office of Violence Prevention. He may testify 

about his interactions and communications with Plaintiff while she was employed with the City. 

Case 2:15-cv-00529-KJM-DB Document 60 Filed 09/22/16 Page 30 of 51
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

31

16. Stanley Thomas: Thomas is an employee of the Office of Violence Prevention. He may 

testify about his interactions and communications with Plaintiff while she employed with the 

City. 

17. Latoya Simmons: Simmons was Plaintiff’s Administrative Assistant. Simmons will testify 

about her interactions and communications with Plaintiff while she employed with the City. 

18. City Councilman Michael Tubbs: Councilmember Tubbs may testify about his 

communications and interactions with Plaintiff while she was employed by the City. 

19. Connie Cochran: Cochran is the City’s Public Information Officer. Cochran may testify 

about her communications and interactions with Plaintiff while she was employed with the City. 

She may also testify about her experiences as a female employee at the City. 

20. Stewart Wakeling: Wakeling is the Executive Director of the Community Partnership for 

Safe Communities. Wakeling may testify about Plaintiff’s hiring and his communications and 

interactions with her after she was hired. Wakeling may also testify about his communications 

with Christian Clegg about Plaintiff and goals of the OVP. 

21. Plaintiff Jessica Glynn: Defendant expects her to testify regarding the allegations in her 

First Amended Complaint, alleged damages and mitigation of such damages. 

22. Marci Arredondo: Arredondo is a Deputy City Attorney for the City of Stockton. She is 

expected to testify regarding what Plaintiff said during a meeting involving a discussion of 

Peacekeeper timekeeping. 

23. Neal Lutterman: Lutterman is a former Deputy City Attorney with the City of Stockton 

and may testify regarding what he heard Plaintiff say regarding communications between 

Peacekeepers and the Stockton Police Department. 

24. John Luebberke: Luebberke is the City Attorney for the City of Stockton. He may testify 

regarding what he heard Plaintiff say regarding communications between Peacekeepers and the 

Stockton Police Department. 

25. Susana Alcala Wood: Wood is the Assistant City Attorney for the City of Stockton. She 

may testify regarding what she heard Plaintiff say regarding communications between 

Peacekeepers and the Stockton Police Department. 

Case 2:15-cv-00529-KJM-DB Document 60 Filed 09/22/16 Page 31 of 51
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

32

26. Jubin Merati: Dr. Merati is an expert witness, expected to testify regarding Plaintiff’s 

alleged damages. 

27. Joanne Latham: Latham is an expert witness, expected to testify regarding Plaintiff’s 

alleged damages. 

 

Case 2:15-cv-00529-KJM-DB Document 60 Filed 09/22/16 Page 32 of 51
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

33

Attachment D: Plaintiff’s Exhibit List 

Exhibit 

No. 

Document Description Bates No. 

1. Printout of webpage/copy of August 11, 2009 memorandum 

prepared by “Alicia Duer, Grants Manager” for Deputy City 

Manager Laurie Montes, concerning a Juvenile Accountability 

Block Grant, pursued by Ms. Montes and Ms. Duer as part of the 

grant funding for Peacekeepers in 2009. 

JG 000712- 

JG 000716 

2. City of Stockton, California, City Manager Administrative 

Directive- HR – 15 - Discrimination and Harassment Policy, 

(March, 2010) 

000114-000125 

3. City of Stockton, California, City Manager Administrative 

Directive- HR – 13- “Employee Performance Evaluation” policy 

(4/18/11) 

Exhibit 20 to 

Van Steyn 

Depo 

4. Operation Peacekeeper Program Policies and Procedures (Created 

January 2008 (4th Revision Effective May 15, 2013) 005072-005083 

5. Email between Laurie Montes and Ralph Womack dated January 

29, 2013 re: “FLSA training” 007810 

6. Email correspondence exchanged between Ralph Womack, Laurie 

Montes, Deanna Solina etc. re: “Possible FLSA training-possible 

overtime issue.” 

007809 

7. Email between Laurie Montes and Ralph Womack dated February 

13, 2013 entitled “meeting.” 007811 

8. January 5, 2014 - Stockton Ceasefire One-Year Implementation 

Update California Partnership for Safe Communities. 

Exhibit Q to 

Declaration of 

Jessica Glynn 

9. April 2014 email correspondence from Frances Hutchins of BHS to 

Alicia Duer and Ken Praegitzer regarding new MHSA plan, 

regulations and end of current BHS funding program. 

004005-004006 

10. May 20, 2014- Job Description for City of Stockton OVP Manager 

position 000073-000075 

11. Comprehensive Summary of City of Stockton Unrepresented 

Management/Confidential and Law Employees Compensation Plan 

(July 1, 2014) 

000082-000113 

12. Stockton Municipal Code, Charter, and Civil Service Rules, 

Section 1201 (“City Manager shall appoint all officers and 

employees of the City of Stockton) 

Case 2:15-cv-00529-KJM-DB Document 60 Filed 09/22/16 Page 33 of 51
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

34

13. San Joaquin MHSA Three-Year Program and Expenditure Plan - 

2014-15 – 2016-17 – February 24, 2014 Presentation to Steering 

Committee 

JG000717- 

JG 000738 

14. San Joaquin County Behavioral Health Services Prevention and 

Early Intervention Evaluation Report – Fiscal Year 2012/2013 

(Prepared June, 2014) 

JG000861- 

JG 000978 

15. San Joaquin County Behavioral Health Services Mental Health 

Services Act (MHSA) Three Year Program and Expenditure Plan2014-2017 (September, 2014) 

 

JG000739-

JG000860 

16. City of Stockton’s September 26, 2014 Job Offer letter to Jessica 

Glynn for OVP Manager position 000008 

17. Christian Clegg’s October 6, 2014 email to David Bennett re: 

Office of Violence Prevention: “We have hired a very qualified 

candidate to head up the office.” 

000883 

18. Kurt Wilson’s October 8, 2014 memorandum to Teresia Zadroga 

Haase, Human Resources Director, re: Office of Violence 

Prevention Manager-Step 6. 

000063 

19. Email correspondence between Plaintiff and Christian Clegg dated 

October 9, 2014 entitled “Couple of items” 000315 

20. Plaintiff’s September 26, 2014 job offer letter signed October 8, 

2014. 000008 

21. Ken Praegitzer October 8, 2014 memorandum to Peacekeepers re: 

Operation Peacekeeper Core Objectives 008468-008470 

22. Email chain between Jessica Glynn and Christian Clegg dated 

October 9, 2014 at 9:24 AM entitled” Couple of items” 

JG 000012- 

JG 000013 

23. Defendant City of Stockton Human Resources (Mary Johnson, 

Human Resources Technician) confirming Jessica Glynn’s 

appointment to OVP Manager position, and attaching October 10, 

2014 correspondence from Deanna Solina) re: confirmation of 

approval of Glynn’s appointment to OVP Manager position. 

JG 000274- 

JG 000281 

24. October 20, 2014 email correspondence between Plaintiff and 

Karen Costa regarding setting up an appointment for Plaintiff with 

City Manager Kurt Wilson 

006937 

25. October 21, 2014 2:03 pm email correspondence between 

Plaintiff and Karen Costa 

006903 

Case 2:15-cv-00529-KJM-DB Document 60 Filed 09/22/16 Page 34 of 51
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

35

26. October 21, 2014 2:17 pm email correspondence between 

Plaintiff and Karen Costa 

006904 

27. October 21, 2014 2:19 pm email correspondence between 

Plaintiff and Karen Costa regarding scheduling appointment for 

Plaintiff and Director of Human Resources DeAnna Solina, and 

request for Plaintiff to immediately call Ms. Solina. 

006905 

28. October 24, 2014 email correspondence from Stewart Wakeling, 

CPSC re: new OVP “Director,” Jessica Glynn. 000384 

29. October 24, 2014 email correspondence from Christian Clegg to 

Jessica Glynn re: “On the phone with IT” 000461 

30. November 7, 2014.email correspondence from Stewart Wakeling, 

CPSC re: new OVP “Director, Jessica Glynn.” 000385 

31. Plaintiff’s November 7, 2014 email correspondence to 

Peacekeepers re: Youth Outreach Coordinator Position Vacancy 0006761 

32. November 10, 2014 email correspondence from Plaintiff to 

Christian Clegg re: follow up on scheduling a further “Meeting with 

Kurt re: legal and safety concerns of Peacekeepers.” 

001006 

33. November 10, 11 and 12 email correspondence from Stewart 

Wakeling of CPSC regarding CalGrip grant application rejection. 

CPSC 1162-

1163; CPSC 

1262-1265 

34. November 11, 2014 email correspondence from Ken Praegitzer to 

Robina Asghar, Executive Director of CPFSJ re: OVP “Director, 

Jessica Glynn.” 

006726 

35. Jaime Constantino’s November 12, 2014 email to Plaintiff with his 

application for the Supervisor position. 005254 

36. November 13, 2014 email correspondence where Plaintiff directed 

Operation Peacekeeper Program Manager Ken Praegitzer, to 

postpone the scheduled November 19, 2014 “Core Group” meeting, 

in light of the Peacekeeper information sharing and legal issues 

Plaintiff had recently raised. 

006706 

37. Plaintiff’s November 19, 2014 emails regarding scheduling of 

internal staff interviews 006662-006664 

38. November 17, 2014 email correspondence from Plaintiff to Alicia 

Duer, Christian Clegg and Ken Praegitzer re: BHS Proposal and 

MOU 

006684; 

006687 

Case 2:15-cv-00529-KJM-DB Document 60 Filed 09/22/16 Page 35 of 51
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

36

39. November 18, 2014 email correspondence from Florence Low to 

Plaintiff re: Staff Report and Reso for the BHS Grant 2014-15 005084-005090 

40. November 19, 2014 email correspondence from Plaintiff in follow 

up to request for scheduling meeting with city Manager, City 

attorneys and Police chief regarding Plaintiff’s legal concerns. 

006652 

41. November 20, 2014 memorandum from Jessica Glynn to Jose 

Gomez and Ken Praegitzer re: Youth Outreach Coordinator 

Transition 

006200 

42. December 18, 2014 email from Frances Hutchins of BHS, that a 

new Request for Proposal would be issued “in early 2015.” 009610 

43. January 5, 2015 email correspondence from Jose Gomez to Sammy 

Nunez, Executive Director of Father & Families, re: Jessica Glynn 

as new OVP Director. 

005341-005342 

44. January 13, 2015 email correspondence from Florence Low to 

Plaintiff, Alicia Duer and Ken Praegitzer re: PEI Funding for 

Operation Peacekeepers, with embedded emails of (1) December 

18, 2014 from Frances Hutchins to Alicia Duer and Ken Praegitzer 

and (2) April 11, 2014 from Frances Hutchins to Alicia Duer and 

other recipients regarding PEI meetings; “Thank you for attending 

yesterday..” 

004005-004006 

004384-4385 

45. Email Chain between Florence Low, Jessica Glynn, Ken Praegitzer, 

Alicia Duer, and Frances Hutchins dated January 14, 2015 at 2:13 

PM entitled “Re: Fwd: PEI funding for Operation Peacekeepers.” 

009040-009042 

46. January 16, 2015 email correspondence from Plaintiff to Alicia 

Duer requesting a meeting to discuss the letter of intent process for 

the BHS grant, and asking for Ms. Duer’s help. 

009044 

47. January 16, 2015 auto-reply from Ms. Duer’s email to Plaintiff, 

indicating Ms. Duer was out of the office from January 16, 2015 

until Tuesday January 20, 2015. 

003588 

48. January 26, 2015 email from Plaintiff to Alicia Duer re: Letter of 

Intent advice. 009043 

49. January 26, 2015 email from Alicia Duer to Plaintiff stating “City 

offices are closed Friday January 23, 2015. 004796 

50. Jose Gomez’s January 28, 2015 memorandum to Christian Clegg 

re: “Bias treatment of Employees and Hostile Work Environment.” 002699-002702 

Case 2:15-cv-00529-KJM-DB Document 60 Filed 09/22/16 Page 36 of 51
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

37

51. January 29, 2015 email correspondence from Ken Praegitzer Judy 

at Heritage Eye Skin & Laser Center, dated January 29, 2015 re: 

Jessica Glynn/new OVP Director. 

005057 

52. January 30, 2015 email correspondence from Michael Tubbs re: 

“Intro” to New Director Jessica Glynn.” 007802 

53. Christian Clegg notes re: investigation/ interviews Constantino and 

Gomez 02703-002705 

54. Christian Clegg 2/15 notes re: ”Summary of Key Issues – 

Management style and fit of Jessica Glynn as OVP Manager.” 002706-2707 

55. Christian Clegg 2/15 notes re: “Notes re: Concerns related to 

Jessica Glynn’s management style and performance.” 002711-002719 

56. February 4, 2015 email correspondence from Alicia Duer to 

Frances Hutchins at BHS re: “PEI Funding for Operation 

Peacekeepers.” 

007262 

57. February 4, 2015 email correspondence from Frances Hutchins at 

BHS to Alicia Duer 007262 

58. February 5, 2015 email from Alicia Duer to Plaintiff, forwarding 

Frances Hutchins email and stating “I guess we may have missed it. 

Still going to research to be sure.” 

007231 

59. February 5, 2015 email from Alicia Duer to Plaintiff re: PEI 

Funding for Operation Peacekeepers, stating “Let me know what I 

can do to assist.” 

005529 

60. February 10, 2015 email correspondence from Plaintiff to various 

Ceasefire partners with Call-In rehearsal agenda. 000386-000387 

61. February 11, 2015 email correspondence from Gretchen Newby/ 

Executive Director of Friends Outside to Plaintiff 

 Jessica Glynn right after the February 11, 2015 Call-in rehearsal 

ended. 

005335-005336 

62. February 11 - 12, 2015 email correspondence between Plaintiff and 

Billy Olpin of BHS. 005327 

63. February 13, 2015 email from Karen Heil of Mule Creek Prison to 

Plaintiff re: Call In success. 005306 

64. Text messages exchanged between Plaintiff Jessica Glynn and City 

Councilman Michael Tubbs on February 13- 14, 2015. 

JG 000361- 

JG 000362 

Case 2:15-cv-00529-KJM-DB Document 60 Filed 09/22/16 Page 37 of 51
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

38

65. February 13, 2015 Correspondence from Kurt Wilson to Plaintiff 

re: termination of employment, with attachments. 

000006-000007 

66. March 10, 2015 correspondence from Tom. Amato and Rev. Ernest 

Williams’ to City Manager Kurt Wilson, with copies to the Mayor, 

City Council, Police Chief Eric Jones and Jessica Glynn. 

JG 000077 – 

JG 000078 

67. Operation Peacekeeper Program Policies and Procedures (Created 

January 2008)(6th Revision effective August 15, 2015) 

68. Plaintiff Jessica Glynn’s Calendar (10/14 – 2/15) 008446-008455 

69. Plaintiff Jessica Glynn’s moleskin notebook (10/14 – 2/15) JG 00079- JG 

000140 

70. Declaration of Kurt Wilson dated May 10, 2016 JG 000932- 

JG 000967 

71. Declaration of Pheakday Youn dated June 17, 2016. JG 000973- 

JG 000974 

72. Declaration of Florence Low dated May 9, 2016 JG 000928- 

JG 000931 

73. Declaration of Christian Clegg dated May 10, 2016 JG 000968- 

JG 000969 

74. Declaration of Florence Low dated June 23, 2016. JG 000970- 

JG 000972 

75. Declaration of Jaime Constantino dated May 6, 2016 JG 000926- 

JG 000927 

76. Declaration of Ken Praegitzer dated May 9, 2016 JG 000924- 

JG 000925 

77.

Printout from www.GovCB.com re: BHS Grant RFP JG 000921 

78. Printout from www.californiabids.com re: BHS Grant RFP JG 000922- 

JG 000923 

79.

Printout from www.usaopps.com re: BHS Grant RFP JG 000922-JG 

000923 

Case 2:15-cv-00529-KJM-DB Document 60 Filed 09/22/16 Page 38 of 51
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

39

80. Printout from NAPC web site re: BHS Grant RFP JG 000917- JG 

000918 

81. 2016 Printout from City of Stockton’s current website re: Alicia 

Duer “Grant Manager” and point of contact. 

JG 000709- 

JG 000711 

82. 12/26/14 email from Starr Leasing Department to Jessica Glynn 

regarding inquiry for 144 Walnut house lease JG 000632 

83. 12/31/14 Email exchanges between Jessica Glynn and Debra Glynn 

regarding 144 E. Walnut Street, Stockton house lease JG 000631 

84. 1/6/15 email correspondence exchanged between Jessica Glynn and 

Eric Sotelo/Realtor re: 144 E. Walnut Street, Stockton house lease 

JG 000633 

85. 1/7/15 email correspondence exchanged between Jessica Glynn and 

Eric Sotelo/Realtor re: 144 E. Walnut Street, Stockton house lease 

JG 000634 

86. 1/7/15 Email exchanges between Jessica Glynn and Debra Glynn 

regarding 144 E. Walnut Street, Stockton house lease 

JG 000635 

87. 1/14/15 email correspondence exchanged between Jessica Glynn 

and Eric Sotelo/Realtor re: 144 E. Walnut Street, Stockton house 

lease 

JG 000636 

88. Residential Lease – One year term – Jessica Glynn/Santiago 

Salinas for 144 E. Walnut Street, Stockton house lease executed 

1/16/15 

JG 000638- 

JG 000643 

89. 1/24/15 email correspondence exchanged between Jessica Glynn 

and Eric Sotelo/Realtor re: 144 E. Walnut Street, Stockton house 

lease –move in date 

JG 000637 

90. Craig Enos - Defense Expert Report – March 30, 2016 and exhibits 

thereto ECF # 17 

91. June 2, 2016 email chain between Jessica Glynn, and Rebecca 

Zaras and Kathy Brown of YWCA re: Meeting with Sherriff JG 000644 

92. June 2-6, 2016 email chain between Jessica Glynn, and Grace 

Lubwama, Rebecca Zaras and Kathy Brown of YWCA re: Meeting 

with Kalamazoo prosecuting attorney 

JG 000645 – 

JG 000649 

93. June 16, 2016 Article – Local Coalition Working to Stop Violence JG 000 651-655 

94. Plaintiff/YWCA $5K Contract and invoice JG 000656- 

Case 2:15-cv-00529-KJM-DB Document 60 Filed 09/22/16 Page 39 of 51
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

40

JG 0006661 

95. July 6, 2016 email from Sarah Baker re: Violence Prevention Task 

Force meeting 

JG 000662- 

JG000666 

96. July 8, 2016 email from William re: Human Trafficking Task Force 

meeting 

JG 000667- 

JG 000668 

97. July 11, 2016 email from Jessica Glynn re: Human Trafficking 

Task Force meeting 

JG 000669- 

JG 000670 

98. July 12, 2016 email from Sarah Baker re: Violence Prevention JG 000671- 

JG 000672 

99. July 13, 2016 email from Sarah Baker to William re: Human 

Trafficking Task Force meeting 

JG 000673- 

JG 000674 

100. July 14, 2016 email from Grace Lubwama/CEO of YWCA 

Kalamazoo re: grant opportunities 

JG 000675- 

JG 000679 

101. July 14, 2016 email from Sarah Baker re: Human Trafficking Task 

Force meeting 

JG 000680- 

JG 000681 

102. July 18, 2016 email from Jessica Glynn re: Human Trafficking 

Task Force-Protocol Working Group 

JG 000682- 

JG 000683 

103. July 21, 2016 email from Jessica Glynn re: Human Trafficking 

Task Force-Protocol Working Group 

JG 000684- 

JG 000685 

104. July 29, 2016 email from Sarah Baker re: Opportunities to support 

Violence Prevention and Build a Healthier community 

JG 000686- 

JG 000687 

105. August, 2016 YWCA Kalamazoo/Jessica Glynn job offer letter JG 000689- 

JG 000690 

106. August 9, 2016 email from Danielle Sielatycki re: Kalamazoo 

Violence Prevention Task Force Reminder 8.11.16 

JG 000691- 

JG 000692 

107. July 21, 2016 Article Re: Operation Ceasefire effort in Kalamazoo, 

MI. 

JG 000696- 

JG 000706 

108. October 11, 2012 Article re: Kalamazoo commitment to Ceasefire 

initiative. 

JG 000707- 

JG 000708 

109. Jessica Glynn updated resume, August 2016. JG 000974- 

JG 000975 

Case 2:15-cv-00529-KJM-DB Document 60 Filed 09/22/16 Page 40 of 51
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

41

Attachment E: Defendant’s Exhibit List 

Exhibit Description Bates-stamp

A (1-3) Office of Violence Prevention 

Manager Job Description 

000073-000075

B City of Stockton Offer of 

Employment to Jessica Glynn 

dated September 26, 2014 and 

signed by Glynn on October 8, 

2014 

000008 

C Email between Clegg, E. 

Jones, and Wakeling dated 

October 7, 2014 entitled 

“October 22nd – meeting with 

OVP director and community 

engagement lead” 

001337 

D Memorandum between Kurt 

Wilson and Teresia ZadrogaHaase dated October 8, 2014 

entitled “Office of Violence 

Prevention Manager – Hire at 

Step 6” 

000063 

E (1-2) Email chain between Jessica 

Glynn and Christian Clegg 

dated October 9, 2014 at 9:24 

AM entitled” Couple of items”

000315 

F (1-3) Press Release dated October 

10, 2014 “Stockton 

Announces Two Key 

Positions Filled: Director 

Community Services and 

Office of Violence Prevention 

Manager Selected” 

001815-1817 

G Correspondence between 

Jessica Glynn and Deanna 

Solina dated October 10, 2014 

entitled “Office of Violence 

Prevention Manager” 

000028 

H (1-3) Email chain between Christian 

Clegg, Jessica Glynn, and 

Connie Cochran dated 

October 14, 2014 between 

11:43 AM and 10:00 PM 

JG000014-0000016

I Email chain between Jessica 

Glynn and Karen Costa dated 

October 21, 2014 between 

12:38 PM and 2:17 PM 

006904 

Case 2:15-cv-00529-KJM-DB Document 60 Filed 09/22/16 Page 41 of 51
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

42

entitled “Meetings with HR”

J (1-2) Email chain between Jessica 

Glynn and JoAnne Montanez 

dated October 23, 2014 at 

10:39 AM entitled “Re: 

Privilege for communications 

between Peacekeepers and 

clients” 

006882-006883

K Email between Jessica Glynn 

and Jose Gomez dated 

October 30, 2014 at 10:45 AM 

entitled “Non-Exempt” 

006831 

L (1-12) Operation Peacekeeper 

Program Policies and 

Procedures – Created January 

2008, 4th revision effective 

May 15, 2013 

005072-005083

M (1-4) Inter-Office Memorandum 

between Jose Gomez to 

Christian Clegg dated January 

28, 2015 entitled “Bias 

Treatment of Employees and 

Hostile Work Environment 

002699-002701

N (1-3) Clegg notes from 2/2 of 

meeting between he and Jose 

Gomez regarding claim of 

hostile work environment

002703-002705

O (1-9) Christian Clegg’s type-written 

notes entitled “OVP Notes” 

002711-002719

P (1-2) Christian Clegg’s type-written 

notes entitled “Summary of 

key Issues – Management 

Style and fit of Jessica Glynn 

as OVP Manager”

002706-2707 

Q Email between Glynn, Alicia 

Duer, Christian Clegg, and 

Ken Praegitzer dated 

November 17, 2014 at 10:32 

AM entitled “BHS proposal 

and MOU”

006684 

R Email between Plaintiff, 

Alicia Duer, Florence Low, 

Christian Clegg, and Ken 

Praegitzer dated November 

17, 2014 at 12:02 PM entitled 

“Re: BHS proposal and 

MOU”

006687 

S (1-3) Email between Florence Low 005084-005085; 005090

Case 2:15-cv-00529-KJM-DB Document 60 Filed 09/22/16 Page 42 of 51
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

43

and Jessica Glynn dated 

November 18, 2014 at 4:31 

PM entitled “Staff Report and 

Reso for the BHS Grant 2014-

15”

T (1-2) Email chain between Florence 

Low, Jessica Glynn, Ken 

Praegitzer, Alicia Duer, and 

Frances Hutchins dated 

January 13, 2015 at 3:38 PM 

entitled “Fwd: PEI funding for 

Operation Peacekeepers”

004384-4385 

U (1-4) Email Chain between Florence 

Low, Jessica Glynn, Ken 

Praegitzer, Alicia Duer, and 

Frances Hutchins dated 

January 14, 2014 at 2:13 PM 

entitled “Re: Fwd: PEI 

funding for Operation 

Peacekeepers”

009040-00942

V Email between Alicia Duer 

and Jessica Glynn dated 

January 16, 2015 at 2:41 PM 

entitled “Re: Letter of intent 

advice (OUT OF OFFICE)” 

003588 

W Email between Alicia Duer 

and Jessica Glynn dated 

January 26, 2015 at 3:02 PM 

entitled “Re: Letter of Intent 

advice” 

004796 

X Email chain between Frances 

Hutchins and Alicia Duer 

dated February 4, 2015 at 1:42 

PM and 1:52 PM entitled 

“Fwd: PEI funding for 

Operation Peacekeepers”

007262 

Y Email chain between Alicia 

Duer and Jessica Glynn dated 

February 4, 2015 at 5:33 PM 

entitled “Fwd: RE: PEI 

funding for Operation 

Peacekeepers”

007276 

Z Email chain between Alicia 

Duer and Jessica Glynn dated 

February 5, 2015 at 9:57 AM 

entitled “Re: PEI funding for 

Operation Peacekeepers”

007231 

AA Email chain between Jessica 

Glynn and Karen Costa dated 

November 24, 2014 at 10:07 

AM entitled “Office assistant 

006213 

Case 2:15-cv-00529-KJM-DB Document 60 Filed 09/22/16 Page 43 of 51
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

44

candidates”

BB Email chain between Jessica 

Glynn, Christian Clegg, and 

Debbie Shipp dated November 

24, 2015 between 10:59 AM 

and 5:11 PM entitled “Re: 

Interview Schedule for 

Tuesday, Nov. 25—Office 

Asst II – OPV”

002091 

CC (1-3) Email chain between Jessica 

Glynn, Debbie Shipp, Karen 

Costa, and Florence Low 

dated December 5, 2014 at 

3:20 PM through December 9, 

2014 at 4:02 PM entitled 

“Update re Interviews next 

Tuesday, Dec. 9, for Office 

Assistant – OVP” 

006388-6389;006394

DD Email chain between Jessica 

Glynn, Debbie Shipp, and 

Mary Johnson dated 

December 9, 2014 between 

3:46 PM and December 10, 

2014 at 11:58 AM entitled 

“Update re Interviews next 

Tuesday, Dec. 9, for Office 

Assistant – OVP” 

002072 

EE (1-2) Email chain between Jessica 

Glynn, Mary Johnson, Debbie 

Shipp, and Christian Clegg 

dated December 15, 2014 

between 2:44 PM and 3:35 

PM entitled “Re: Latoya 

Simmons”

000565-566 

FF Email chain between Jessica 

Glynn and Christian Clegg 

dated November 5, 2014 at 

4:55 PM and January 2, 2015 

at 11:28 AM entitled “Two 

items”

006630 

GG Email between Laurie Montes 

and Ralph Womack dated 

January 29, 2013 at 7:24 PM 

entitled “FLSA training”

007810 

HH Email chain between Ralph 

Womack, Tami Matuska, 

Laurie Montes, and DeAnna 

Solina dated January 30, 2013 

at 10:12 AM and 10:19 AM 

entitled “Re: Possible FLSA 

training – possible issue 

regarding overtime”

007809 

Case 2:15-cv-00529-KJM-DB Document 60 Filed 09/22/16 Page 44 of 51
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

45

II Email between Laurie Montes 

and Ralph Womack dated 

February 13, 2013 at 4:04 PM 

entitled “meeting”

7811 

JJ (1-2) Instant Message Chain 

between Jessica Glynn and 

Michael Tubbs dated February 

13, 2015 at 8:27 PM

JG000361-000362

KK Email between Jessica Glynn 

and Christian Clegg dated 

October 24, 2014 between 

8:41 AM and 12:18 PM 

entitled “Re: On the phone 

with IT”

006875 

LL (1-2) Email chain from Christian 

Clegg and Jessica Glynn dated 

October 14, 2014 at 10:09 PM 

and October 15, 2015 at 9:23 

AM entitled “Re: Thursday”

JG000019-000020

MM (1-19) Jessica Glynn’s June 17, 2016 

declaration in support of her 

Opposition to the City’s 

Motion for Summary 

Judgment

Not Bates-Stamped: will be 

marked KK -1 through KK19. 

NN (1-17) Expert Report of Jubin Merati, 

Ph.D., and attached exhibits

ECF Doc. 18 filed April 4, 

2016 

OO (1-17) Expert Report of Joanne 

Latham, M.A., CRC, MFT, 

CCM, ABVE/D, CLCP and 

attached exhibits

ECF Doc. 18 filed April 4, 

2016 

PP City of Stockton 

Hire/Personnel Action Form 

dated October 10, 2014

000011 

QQ City of Stockton Employment 

Categories

000080 

RR Email chain between Jessica 

Glynn and Christian Clegg 

dated October 29 and 30, 2014 

at 9:23 AM and 12:03 PM 

entitled “My schedule today”

000547 

SS Plaintiff produced 

approximately three hundred 

additional documents 

regarding her damages on 

August 9, 2016. The City has 

not been able to review the 

entire production. The City 

reserves the right to use any of 

Plaintiff’s production Batesstamped 000644-000976.

TT Email chain between Trevor 

Womack and Christian Clegg 

dated January 13, 2015 at 2:08 

PM entitled “FW: Ceasefire 

000309 

Case 2:15-cv-00529-KJM-DB Document 60 Filed 09/22/16 Page 45 of 51
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

46

re-entry call-in workshop 

confirmation for 1/15 at 1pm” 

UU Email chain between Christian 

Clegg and Glenn Shields and 

Jose Rodriguez dated October 

9, 2014 at 9:42 AM entitled 

“Jose and Pastor Shields”

000320 

VV (1-5) City of Stockton Invitation for 

Applications for Office of 

Violence Prevention Manager

000359-000360; 002151-2153

WW (1-2) Resume of Jessica Glynn to 

City of Stockton

000039-000040

XX (1-2) Email chain between Jessica 

Glynn and Alicia Duer dated 

January 16, 2015 at 2:41 PM; 

January 20, 2015 at 2:18 PM; 

and January 26, 2015 at 11:02 

PM entitled “Letter of intent 

advice”

009042-009043

 

Case 2:15-cv-00529-KJM-DB Document 60 Filed 09/22/16 Page 46 of 51
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

47

Attachment F: Plaintiff’s Discovery Documents Plaintiff Intends to Use at Trial 

DISCOV ERY DOCUMENT NAME 

1. Defendant City of Stockton’s Amended Initial Disclosures 

2. Defendant City of Stockton’s responses to RFPD, Set One 

3. Defendant City of Stockton’s Supplemental Responses to RFPD, Set One 

4. Defendant City of Stockton’s Supplemental Responses to RFPD, Set One – 

Privilege Log 

5. Defendant City of Stockton’s Responses to RFPD, Set Two 

6. Defendant City of Stockton’s Responses to RFPD, Set Three 

7. Defendant City of Stockton’s Responses to RFPD, Set Four 

8. Defendant City of Stockton’s Responses to RFPD, Set Five 

9. Defendant City of Stockton’s responses to Special Interrogatories, Set One 

10. Defendant City of Stockton’s Supplemental Responses to Special Interrogatories, 

Set One 

 

Case 2:15-cv-00529-KJM-DB Document 60 Filed 09/22/16 Page 47 of 51
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

48

Attachment G: Deposition Transcripts Plaintiff Intends to Use at Trial 

DEPOSITION TRANSCRIPT PORTIONS FOR USE AT TRIAL 

1. Deposition transcript of Defendant, City of 

Stockton Person Most Qualified (PMQ) 

Designee, Christian Clegg, Volume I, taken 

on October 27, 2015. 

Page/line: 19:14-20:3; 36:10-38:5; 

38:20-22; 39:19-43:8; 44:21-45:13; 

46:6-61:25; 61:6; 63:1-25; 64:1-4; 

65:4-9; 73:3-13; 83:19-85:14; 86:7-

91:18; 97:12-98:1; 99:14-100:12; 

120:4-12; 121:5-13; 122:5-8; 

123:12-17; 125:3-19; 128:10-

133:12; 136:15-137:-10; 148:5-8; 

151:2-169.19; 171:15-175:1; 

174:17-175:2; 175:11-183:2; 

186:20-22; 190:16-197:18; 197:19-

202:6; 202:14-209:25; 210:9-

226:7; 226:9-230:13; 235:12-

236:14; 240:1-14; 241:3-12; 

241:24-242:14; 243:13-18; 243:25-

244:20; 249:8-12; 254:2-256:5; 

Exh. 3 (pages 2606-2607); Exh. 11. 

2. Deposition transcript of Defendant, City of 

Stockton Person Most Qualified (PMQ) 

Designee, Christian Clegg, Volume II, taken 

on October 28, 2015. 

Page/line: 236:20-22; 267:2-

274:25; 278:13-280:3; 281:6-

282:4; 284:25- 287:3; 287:4-288:6; 

289:18-297:25; 299:17-300:20; 

301:2-5; 304:25-305:19; 305:7-10; 

308:15-311:5; 312:12-19; 336:15-

337:11; 337:22-25; 338:3-11; 

343:15-344:2; 345:2-7; 345:17-24; 

352:16-25; 353:1-359:4; 359:17-

360:1; 397:11-401:14; 415:22-

416:17; 418:21-425:8; 426:25-

444:19; 446:6-11; 455:15-456:7; 

485:23-487:11; 494:11-496:22. 

3. Deposition transcript of Defendant, City of 

Stockton Person Most Qualified (PMQ) 

Designee Kurt Wilson, taken on October 29, 

2015. 

Page/line: 4:13-21; 9:17-11:2; 

12:4-13:3; 16:5-18:12; 22:21-

26:21; 28:4-8; 29:11-23; 32:17-20; 

35:5-21; 42:21-25; 50:9-14; 53:3-

54:6; 58:5-12; 60:17-61:16; 62:21-

63:16; 63:19-24; 64:12-16; 64:22-

66:4; 66:18-69:22; 70:12-21; 

71:11-71:25; 72:15-18; Exh. 14; 

Exh. 15; 

4. Deposition transcript of Defendant, City of Page/line: 6:1-15; 10:6-18; 11:14-

Case 2:15-cv-00529-KJM-DB Document 60 Filed 09/22/16 Page 48 of 51
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

49

Stockton Person Most Qualified (PMQ) 

Designee Ken Praegitzer, taken on 

November 9, 2015. 

16:1; 13:1-9; 17:11-19:3; 19:15-

21:11; 20:1-22:21; 23:17-24:4; 

25:20-27:17; 28:4-30:10; 32:9-14; 

33:7-35:25; 33:20-35:6; 36:4-9; 

37:6-22; 38:16-39:11; 39:24-41:8; 

41:22-43:7; 43:16-45:6; 46:7-

47:14; 48:18-49:24; 49:1-22; 

53:15-56:12; 61:3-62:4; 63:1-11; 

73:23-74:12 

5. Deposition transcript of Defendant, City of 

Stockton Person Most Qualified (PMQ) 

Designee Deanna Solina, taken on 

November 9, 2015. 

Page/line: 4:13-16; 5:3-6:11; 8:18-

13:2; 13:15-14:24; 15:13-15:24; 

16:22-18:23; 19:3-22:17; 23:24- 

24:4; 24:18-27:12; 27:22-29:7; 

29:19-24; 30:6-33:19; 33:25-35:9; 

35:11-41:9; Exh. 32 

6. Deposition transcript of Defendant, City of 

Stockton Person Most Qualified (PMQ) 

Designee Stephanie Van Steyn, taken on 

October 29, 2015. 

Page/line: 4:13-5:16; 8:3-16; 9:14-

11:19; 13:6-14:1; 14:2-25; 15:17-

19:3; 20:21-21:20; 22:5-24:19; 

24:23-26:25; 28:1-29:11; 29:14-

30:19-31:7; 40:6-42:22; 43:24-

51:5; 55:23-57:3; 59:9-15; 60:9-

62:17; 64:7-14; 65:2-5; 65:19-

66:16; 74:23-76:3; 76:4-11; 76:5-

78:1 76:24-77:18; 79:9-81:7; 

81:23-98:12; Exhs. 16; 17; 23; 24; 

25; 26. 

7. Deposition transcript of Defendant, City of 

Stockton Person Most Qualified (PMQ) 

Designee Trevor Womack, taken on 

November 20, 2015. 

Page/line: 4:13-17; 5:6-12; 7:19-

8:3; 9:11-10:19; 11:1-14:3; 15:14-

16:25; 18:3-19:15; 21:3-25:18; 

25:23-31:6; 31:18-36:5; 36:17-

38:15; 39:1-45:11; 46:4-47:9; 

47:13-17; 48:5-49:13; 49:21-51:12; 

52:1-56:11; 57:17-24; 59:1-6; 

60:22-61:14; 63:23-65:8; 66:7-15; 

75:19-77:10; 78:13-25; Exh. 34. 

8. Deposition transcript of Defendant, City of 

Stockton Person Most Qualified (PMQ) 

Designee Laurie Montes, taken on October 

29, 2015. 

Page/line: 4:22-25; 11:5-13:16; 

13:23-20:25; 21:11-16; 21:22-22:8; 

22:24-31:15; 31:20-33:2-36:23; 

49:24-50:12. 

9. Deposition transcript of Savong Lam, taken 

on February 17, 2016. 

Page/line: 6:16-8:18; 10:19-11:25; 

40:6-41:3. 32:20-35:7; 44:14-

45:22; 55:6-57:13; 57:17-58:20. 

Case 2:15-cv-00529-KJM-DB Document 60 Filed 09/22/16 Page 49 of 51
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

50

10. Deposition transcript of Matthew Lam, taken 

on February 29, 2016. 

Page/line: 4:3-18; 9:9 – 12; 10:24 – 

12:19; 14:17 – 17:1; 20:10 – 21; 

21:2-24:23; 33:23-34:17; 38:22- 

41:1; 3:12-21; 42:23-25; 43:12-

46:20; 47:9 – 51:14; 52:19- 53:12; 

54:9 – 24; 55:20 – 60:8; 65:4 – 12; 

70:20 – 73:23; 74:22-77:10; 78:22 

– 80:12; 83:5- 88:23 - 89:22; 91:6-

94:1; 94:9 – 95:13; 114:25 – 

115:13. 

 

 

Case 2:15-cv-00529-KJM-DB Document 60 Filed 09/22/16 Page 50 of 51
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

51

Attachment H: Defendant’s List of Deposition Transcripts and Discovery Responses 

Deposition Transcripts: 

1. Plaintiff Jessica Glynn 

 2. Michael Lam 

 3. Robina Asghar 

 4. Savong Lam 

 5. Jose Gomez 

 6. Ken Praegitzer 

 7. Moses Zapien 

 8. Santiago Salinas 

 9. Debra Glynn 

 10. Craig Enos 

 11. Gene Acevedo 

Discovery Responses: 

 1. Plaintiff’s Expert Disclosures 

 2. Plaintiff’s Responses to City’s Special Interrogatories, Set One 

Case 2:15-cv-00529-KJM-DB Document 60 Filed 09/22/16 Page 51 of 51