Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca5-14-41044/USCOURTS-ca5-14-41044-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
David Jose Argueta-Bonilla
Appellant
United States of America
Appellee

Document Text:

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-41044

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

DAVID JOSE ARGUETA-BONILLA,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 7:14-CR-276-1

Before JOLLY, GRAVES, and COSTA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, David Jose Argueta-Bonilla 

raises an argument that is foreclosed by United States v. Morales-Mota, 704 

F.3d 410, 412 (5th Cir. 2013), which rejected the argument that the Texas 

offense of “burglary of a habitation” is broader than the generic, contemporary 

definition of “burglary of a dwelling” under U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(1)(A)(ii) 

because it defines the “owner” of a habitation as a person with a “greater right

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

August 18, 2015

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 14-41044 Document: 00513158053 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/18/2015
No. 14-41044

2

to possession of the property than the actor.” The motion for summary 

disposition is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

 Case: 14-41044 Document: 00513158053 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/18/2015