Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-19-06670/USCOURTS-ca4-19-06670-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Daheem Bryant-Royal
Appellant
United States of America
Appellee

Document Text:

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-6670

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

DAHEEM BRYANT-ROYAL,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. 

Ellen L. Hollander, District Judge. (1:12-cr-00040-ELH-1; 1:16-cv-02891-ELH)

Submitted: December 27, 2019 Decided: February 20, 2020

Before KING and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

C. Justin Brown, BROWN LAW, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellant. Robert K. Hur, 

United States Attorney, Jason D. Medinger, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF 

THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 19-6670 Doc: 26 Filed: 02/20/2020 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Daheem Bryant-Royal appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 

U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. BryantRoyal, Nos. 1:12-cr-00040-ELH-1; 1:16-cv-02891-ELH (D. Md. May 1, 2019). We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

AFFIRMED

USCA4 Appeal: 19-6670 Doc: 26 Filed: 02/20/2020 Pg: 2 of 2