Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-00707/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-00707-2/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Maurice Davis
Plaintiff
State of California
Defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MAURICE DAVIS,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-0707 FCD CMK P

vs.

STATE OF CALIFORNIA,

Defendant. ORDER

 /

On July 26, 2005, plaintiff filed “objection to defendant’s notice of motion and

motion to dismiss; memorandum of points and authorities.” That document was not served on

defendant. Plaintiff is advised that every document submitted to the court for consideration must

be served on defendant. Fed. R. Civ. P. 5. Documents not to be served electronically are usually

served by placing a copy in the U.S. mail. If an attorney has filed a document with the court on

behalf of any defendant, then documents submitted by plaintiff must be served on that attorney

and not on the defendant. Every document submitted conventionally to the court (e.g., by a

prisoner proceeding pro se) must include a certificate stating the date an accurate copy of the

document was mailed to defendants or their attorney and the address to which it was mailed. See

Local Rule 5-135(b) and (c).

/////

Case 2:04-cv-00707-FCD-CMK Document 22 Filed 08/04/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that within fifteen days from the date of

this order plaintiff shall serve a copy of plaintiff’s July 26, 2005 “objection to defendant’s notice

of motion and motion to dismiss; memorandum of points and authorities” on counsel for

defendant and shall file proper proof of said service. Plaintiff is cautioned that failure to comply 

with this order may result in the imposition of sanctions. Plaintiff is further cautioned that

failure to serve any documents subsequently filed in this action properly, and failure to include a

proper certificate of service with such filing, may result in a recommendation that this action be

dismissed.

DATED: August 3, 2005.

______________________________________

CRAIG M. KELLISON

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:04-cv-00707-FCD-CMK Document 22 Filed 08/04/05 Page 2 of 2