Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-00798/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-00798-3/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Baltimore Aircoil Company
Defendant
Cincinnati Incorporated
Defendant
Alex Galindo
Plaintiff
Irene Galindo
Plaintiff
The Cincinnati Shaper Company
Defendant

Document Text:

STEPHEN H. DYE (State Bar No. 104385)

T. SCOTT TATE (State Bar No. 118427)

MARGARET L. SELL (State Bar No. 184088)

SCHNADER HARRISON SEGAL & LEWIS LLP

One Montgomery Street, Suite 2200

San Francisco, CA 94104-5501

Telephone: (415) 364-6700

Fax: (415) 364-6785

Attorneys for Defendant CINCINNATI INCORPORATED

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - FRESNO

ALEX GALINDO and IRENE GALINDO, 

Plaintiffs,

v. 

BALTIMORE AIRCOIL COMPANY, a

corporation; CINCINNATI

INCORPORATED, doing business in

California as “The Cincinnati Shaper

Company,” a corporation; and DOES 1

through 100, 

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 07-CV-00798-LJO-GSA 

ORDER DETERMINING GOOD FAITH

SETTLEMENT [C.C.P. § 877.6(a)(2)] 

The Application of Defendant CINCINNATI INCORPORATED dated February 7,

2008, for an Order determining the good faith of the settlement having been presented to this

Court; and

IT APPEARING TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE COURT THAT the said

Application is made pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure § 877.6(a)(2) and that copies of the

said Application, together with a Notice of Settlement, and a copy of this Order were served

by certified mail with return receipt requested on this Court and all parties to this action on

Case 1:07-cv-00798-LJO-GSA Document 27 Filed 02/28/08 Page 1 of 2
February 8, 2008; and that no Notice of Motion to Contest the Good Faith of the said

Settlement has been served or filed within the time allowed by Code of Civil Procedure

§ 877.6(a)(2); and that no confidentiality clause of any kind is contained in the said

Settlement Agreement;

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that:

1. The settlement entered into by and between the Settling Parties, as defined in said

Application, was and is made in good faith and in accordance with the provisions of Code of

Civil Procedure §§877 and 877.6; and

2. Any and all claims for equitable or implied indemnity or comparative contribution

against defendant CINCINNATI INCORPORATED, or any claims arising out of or connected in

any way with the involvement of defendant CINCINNATI INCORPORATED in the design,

manufacture, sale, distribution or service of the equipment or tools involved in the Incident,

which is the subject of this litigation, are hereby dismissed with prejudice and forever barred.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 28, 2008 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill 

66h44d UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:07-cv-00798-LJO-GSA Document 27 Filed 02/28/08 Page 2 of 2