Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-03546/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-03546-2/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
City of Alameda
Defendant
Valerie Clem
Plaintiff
Antonio Everett
Plaintiff

Document Text:

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER RE CONTINUING CMC 

Everett et al v. City of Alameda, et al. [Case No. C 05-03546 MJJ] 1 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WALTER L. DAVIS, State Bar No. 098513 

22320 Foothill Blvd., Suite 600 

Hayward, CA 94541 

Telephone: (510) 888-9040 

Facsimile: (510) 888-9044 

Attorney for Plaintiffs 

ANTONIO EVERETT and VALERIE CLEM 

GREGORY M. FOX, State Bar No. 070876 

BERTRAND, FOX & ELLIOT 

The Waterfront Building 

2749 Hyde Street 

San Francisco, CA 94109 

Telephone: (415) 353-0999 

Facsimile: (415) 353-0990 

CAROL A. KORADE, State Bar No. 082133 

CITY ATTORNEY, CITY OF ALAMEDA 

City Hall 

2263 Santa Clara Avenue, Room 280 

Alameda, CA 94501 

Telephone: (510) 748-4544 

Facsimile: (510) 748-4691 

Attorneys for Defendant 

CITY OF ALAMEDA 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

ANTONIO EVERETT and VALIERIE CLEM, 

 Plaintiffs, 

 vs. 

CITY OF ALAMEDA, DOE POLICE 

OFFICERS 1 THROUGH 10, individually and 

in their capacity as members of the Police 

Department for the City of Alameda, 

 Defendants. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Case No. C 05-03546 MJJ 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

RE: CONTINUING JOINT CASE 

MANAGEMENT STATEMENT. 

Case Management 

Conference Date: June 20, 2006 

Time: 2:00 p.m. 

Courtroom: 11, 19th Floor 

 San Francisco, CA 

Honorable Martin J. Jenkins 

Case 3:05-cv-03546-MJJ Document 12 Filed 06/14/2006 Page 1 of 4
 Case 3:05-cv-03546-MJJ Document 13 Filed 06/16/06 Page 1 of 4
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER RE CONTINUING CMC 

Everett et al v. City of Alameda, et al. [Case No. C 05-03546 MJJ] 2 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 The parties hereby submit the following stipulation and proposed order continuing the Joint 

Case Management Conference from June 20, 2006 until August 22, 2006. Good cause exists for this 

stipulation and proposed order in that counsel for plaintiffs has advised counsel for the defendant that 

following his review of relevant documents provided by the defendant about the facts of the case he 

is prepared to recommend to his clients that they dismiss the case in its entirety and with prejudice 

with each side bearing their own fees and costs. 

 Counsel for the plaintiffs needs additional time to meet in person with his clients to discuss 

his recommendation and to prepare the necessary stipulation and order of dismissal. And the clients 

may need additional time to review his recommendation and make a decision based on his 

recommendation. Counsel for the defendant also needs additional time because he plans on attending 

his oldest daughter’s graduation from UC San Diego which is scheduled to occur Monday, June 19, 

2006 and he will not be back in the office until Thursday, June 22, 2006. Counsel for the defendant 

also will be out of the country July 7th through July 21 and will be taking his middle daughter to 

college in Seattle July 31 and August 1. If for some reason the plaintiffs do not decide to dismiss, 

then the parties will need one week to prepare the necessary joint case management conference 

statement before the next Case Management Conference. 

So stipulated: 

DATED: June 14, 2006 /s/ 

 WALTER L. DAVIS 

 Attorney for Plaintiffs 

DATED: June 14, 2006 /s/ 

 GREGORY M. FOX 

 Attorney for Defendant City of Alameda 

Case 3:05-cv-03546-MJJ Document 12 Filed 06/14/2006 Page 2 of 4
 Case 3:05-cv-03546-MJJ Document 13 Filed 06/16/06 Page 2 of 4
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER RE CONTINUING CMC 

Everett et al v. City of Alameda, et al. [Case No. C 05-03546 MJJ] 3 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

 Good cause appearing the stipulation is So Ordered. The case management conference 

scheduled for June 20, 2006 is continued to August 22, 2006. If the case is not dismissed before that 

date, a new joint case management conference statement shall be filed on or before August 15, 2006. 

DATED: June ___ , 2006 

 MARTIN J. JENKINS 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 

Case 3:05-cv-03546-MJJ Document 12 Filed 06/14/2006 Page 3 of 4

16

Case 3:05-cv-03546-MJJ Document 13 Filed 06/16/06 Page 3 of 4
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER RE CONTINUING CMC 

Everett et al v. City of Alameda, et al. [Case No. C 05-03546 MJJ] 4 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 I hereby attest that I have on file all holograph signatures for any signatures indicated by a 

“conformed” signature (/s/) within this e-filed document. 

Dated: June 14, 2006 /s/ 

 GREGORY M. FOX 

 

Case 3:05-cv-03546-MJJ Document 12 Filed 06/14/2006 Page 4 of 4
 Case 3:05-cv-03546-MJJ Document 13 Filed 06/16/06 Page 4 of 4