Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca10-90-06182/USCOURTS-ca10-90-06182-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Attorney General
Appellee
Cecil Glendall Martin
Appellant
Dan M. Reynolds
Appellee

Document Text:

URITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT 

CECIL GLENDALL MARTIN, 

Petitioner-Appellant, 

FI LED 

United States Coun of Appeals 

Tenth Cirrufr 

OCT 111990 

ROBERT L. HOECKER 

Clerk 

v. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

No. 90-6182 

DAN M. REYNOLDS and ATTORNEY 

GENERAL, 

Respondents-Appellees. 

(D.C. No. CIV-89-2150-P) 

(W.D. Oklahoma) 

ORDER AND JUDGMENT* 

Submitted on the Briefs: 

Before MCKAY, MOORE, and BRORBY, Circuit Judges. 

This is an appeal from a denial of a writ of habeas corpus 

filed under 28 u.s.c. S 2254. The issues raised on appeal are 

identical to the issues raised in the district court. Our 

examination of the record and the issues leads to the conclusion 

*This order and judgment has no precedential value and shall not 

be cited, or used by any court within the Tenth Circuit, except 

for purposes of establishing the doctrines of the law of the case, 

res judicata, or collateral estoppel. 10th Cir. R. 36.3. 

Appellate Case: 90-6182 Document: 010110059567 Date Filed: 10/11/1990 Page: 1 
the denial of relief was proper. We grant a certificate of 

probable cause to appeal and we AFFIRM the judgment of the 

district court for the reasons set forth in its Memorandum 

Opinion. 

Entered for the Court 

John P. Moore 

Circuit Judge 

-2-

Appellate Case: 90-6182 Document: 010110059567 Date Filed: 10/11/1990 Page: 2