Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-01183/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-01183-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
AMCO Insurance Company
Defendant
Amanda Flores
Plaintiff

Document Text:

LAW OFFICES OF

FRAME &

MATSUMOTO

PO Box 895

Coalinga, CA 

93210

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE MOTION TO DISMISS COMPLAINT; ORDER THEREON- 1

Ted R. Frame, Esq., SBN 023736

Russell Matsumoto, Esq., SBN 084949

FRAME & MATSUMOTO

Attorneys at Law

201 Washington Street

PO Box 895

Coalinga, CA 93210-0895

Phone (559) 935-1552

Fax (559) 935-1555

Attorneys for Plaintiff

Amanda Flores

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

FRESNO DIVISION

AMANDA FLORES, an individual

 Plaintiff, 

vs. 

AMCO INSURANCE COMPANY; a

corporation, 

 Defendant. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO.: 1:07-CV-01183-LJO-DLB

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE

MOTION TO DISMISS

COMPLAINT; ORDER THEREON 

Date: November 2, 2007

Time; 8:30 a.m. 

Ctrm: Four 

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto that Plaintiff

Amanda Flores and Defendant AMCO Insurance Company through their respective

undersigned attorneys, that Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Complaint currently set

to be heard on November 2, 2007, be continued to November 20, 2007, at 8:30 a.m. 

Said Stipulation is made in the interest of justice in that Ted R. Frame, attorney

for Plaintiff, has a scheduling conflict with the date currently set, November 2, 2007. 

DATED: October 11, 2007

FRAME & MATSUMOTO

Case 1:07-cv-01183-LJO-DLB Document 12 Filed 10/15/07 Page 1 of 2
LAW OFFICES OF

FRAME &

MATSUMOTO

PO Box 895

Coalinga, CA 

93210

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE MOTION TO DISMISS COMPLAINT; ORDER THEREON- 2

BY:

Russell Matsumoto, Attorneys for

Plaintiff

DATED: October 11, 2007 LEWIS, BRISBOIS, BISGAARD & SMITH

LLP 

BY:

Julian J. Pardini, Attorneys for

Defendants 

ORDER

A Stipulation having been entered into by the respective parties for a

continuance of Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Complaint and good cause appearing

therefore, 

IT IS ORDERED that the date of November 2, 2007, the date currently set for

Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Complaint, is continued to November 20, 2007, at

8:30 a.m. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 12, 2007 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill 

b9ed48UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:07-cv-01183-LJO-DLB Document 12 Filed 10/15/07 Page 2 of 2