Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-03828/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-03828-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Align Technology, Inc
Plaintiff
OrthoClear Holdings, Inc.
Defendant
OrthoClear, Inc.
Defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Case No. C 06-3828 SC

SF1:644554.1

STIP. AND [PROP.] ORDER REGARDING 

DEFS. DEADLINE TO RESP. TO CPLT.

DARIN W. SNYDER (S.B. #136003) dsnyder@omm.com

ROBERT D. TRONNES (S.B. #209835) rtronnes@omm.com

O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP

Embarcadero Center West

275 Battery Street

San Francisco, CA 94111-3305

Telephone: (415) 984-8700

Facsimile: (415) 984-8701

Attorneys for Defendants

OrthoClear, Inc. and OrthoClear Holdings, Inc.

MARK E. MCKEEN (S.B. #130950) markmckeen@paulhastings.com

PETER C. MEIER (S.B. #179019) petermeier@paulhastings.com

RICHARD E. ELDER (S.B. #205389) richardelder@paulhastings.com

PAUL, HASTINGS, JANOFSKY & WALKER LLP

55 Second Street, 24th Floor

San Francisco, CA 94105-3441

Telephone: (415) 856-7000

Facsimile: (415) 856-7100

Attorneys for Plaintiff

Align Technology, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

ALIGN TECHNOLOGY, INC.,

Plaintiff,

v.

ORTHOCLEAR, INC. and 

ORTHOCLEAR HOLDINGS, INC.

Defendants.

Case No. C 06-3828 SC

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANTS 

ORTHOCLEAR, INC.’S AND 

ORTHOCLEAR HOLDINGS, INC.’S 

DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO THE FIRST 

AMENDED COMPLAINT

Hearing Date: n/a

Time: n/a

Courtroom: 1

Judge: Hon. Samuel Conti

Case 3:06-cv-03828-SC Document 28 Filed 09/22/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Case No. C 06-3828 SC - 1 -

SF1:644554.1

STIP. AND [PROP.] ORDER REGARDING 

DEFS. DEADLINE TO RESP. TO CPLT.

Whereas, on September 6, 2006, plaintiff Align Technology, Inc. filed its First Amended 

Complaint;

Whereas the parties met-and-conferred and agreed that it was appropriate to extend 

defendants OrthoClear, Inc.’s and OrthoClear Holdings, Inc.’s deadline to respond to the First 

Amended Complaint;

It is hereby STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and among the undersigned counsel, that

defendants OrthoClear, Inc.’s and OrthoClear Holdings, Inc.’s deadline to respond to the First 

Amended Complaint is extended by eighteen (18) days from September 25, 2006, to October 13, 

2006.

Dated: September 21, 2006 ROBERT D. TRONNES

O'MELVENY & MYERS LLP

By: /s/ Robert D. Tronnes

Robert D. Tronnes

Attorneys for Defendants OrthoClear, Inc. and 

OrthoClear Holdings, Inc.

Dated: September 21, 2006 RICHARD E. ELDER

PAUL, HASTINGS, JANOFSKY & WALKER LLP

By: /s/ Richard E. Elder

Richard E. Elder

Attorneys for Plaintiff Align Technology, Inc.

Filer’s Attestation: Pursuant to General Order No. 45, § X(B), I attest under penalty of perjury 

that concurrence in the filing of the document has been obtained from the signatory. 

Dated: September 21, 2006 /s/ Robert D. Tronnes

 Robert D. Tronnes

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September ____, 2006

 

Hon. Samuel Conti

U.S. District Judge

SF1:643773.2

22

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Samuel Conti

Case 3:06-cv-03828-SC Document 28 Filed 09/22/06 Page 2 of 2