Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_13-cv-01154/USCOURTS-caed-1_13-cv-01154-6/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
L. Cahlander
Defendant
Michael Anthony Webb
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MICHAEL ANTHONY WEBB,

Plaintiff,

v.

L. CAHLANDER, 

Defendant.

Case No. 1:13-cv-01154 DLB PC

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION 

FOR EXTENSION OF TIME AS MOOT

[ECF No. 42]

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S 

REQUEST FOR COURT ORDER

[ECF No. 43]

Plaintiff is a California state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil 

action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed this action on July 25, 2013.1

On December 4, 2014, Plaintiff filed a request for an extension of time concerning 

Defendant’s motion to strike Plaintiff’s unauthorized sur-replies. Plaintiff is advised that the 

Court granted Defendant’s motion on November 7, 2014. The sur-replies have been stricken. 

Therefore, Plaintiff’s motion for an extension of time is moot.

On December 4, 2014, Plaintiff filed a request for an order directing Defendant 

Cahlander to file an answer to the complaint. Plaintiff is advised that Defendant Cahlander filed 

an answer on December 4, 2014. Therefore, Plaintiff’s motion is moot.

 

1 The parties have consented to the jurisdiction of the Magistrate Judge.

Case 1:13-cv-01154-DLB Document 45 Filed 12/15/14 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

ORDER

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:

1) Plaintiff’s motion for extension of time is DENIED as moot; and

2) Plaintiff’s motion for court order is DENIED as moot.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: December 13, 2014 /s/ Dennis L. Beck 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:13-cv-01154-DLB Document 45 Filed 12/15/14 Page 2 of 2