Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_10-cv-00048/USCOURTS-cand-3_10-cv-00048-10/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Fortinet, Inc.
Plaintiff
Trend Micro Incorporated
Defendant

Document Text:

SECOND STIPULATED MOTION FOR ORDER (1) 

VACATING AND RESETTING CASE MANAGEMENT 

CONFERENCE AND ADR DEADLINES, AND (2) 

CONTINUING LOCAL PATENT RULE DISCLOSURES; 

AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

Civil Case No.: CV 10-0048 MMC

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Robert D. Fram (Bar No. 126750) 

 Email: rfram@cov.com 

Sonya D. Winner (Bar No. 200348 

 Email: swinner@cov.com 

COVINGTON & BURLING LLP 

One Front Street 

San Francisco, CA 94111 

Telephone: (415) 591-6000 

Facsimile: (415) 591-6091 

Andrew C. Byrnes (Bar No. 191516) 

 Email: abyrnes@cov.com 

COVINGTON & BURLING LLP 

333 Twin Dolphin Drive, Suite 700 

Redwood Shores, CA 94065 

Telephone: (650) 678-1800 

Facsimile: (650) 678-1600 

Attorneys for Defendants 

TREND MICRO INCORPORATED (a 

California corporation); TREND MICRO 

INCORPORATED (a Japanese corporation); 

and TREND MICRO INCORPORATED (a 

Taiwanese corporation) 

Michael A. Ladra (Bar No. 64307) 

 Email: mladra@wsgr.com 

Stefani E. Shanberg (Bar No. 206717) 

 Email: sshanberg@wsgr.com 

Robin L. Brewer (Bar No. 253686) 

 Email: rbrewer@wsgr.com 

WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & 

ROSATI

Professional Corporation 

650 Page Mill Road 

Palo Alto, California 94304 

Telephone: (650) 493-9300 

Facsimile: (650) 493-6811 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

FORTINET, INC. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

FORTINET, INC., a Delaware corporation, 

 Plaintiff 

 v. 

TREND MICRO INCORPORATED, et al., 

 Defendants. 

 Civil Case No.: CV 10-0048 MMC 

SECOND STIPULATED MOTION 

FOR ORDER (1) VACATING AND 

RESETTING CASE 

MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 

AND ADR DEADLINES, AND (2) 

CONTINUING LOCAL PATENT 

RULE DISCLOSURES; AND 

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

Case 3:10-cv-00048-MMC Document 64 Filed 04/13/10 Page 1 of 4
SECOND STIPULATED MOTION FOR ORDER (1) 

VACATING AND RESETTING CASE MANAGEMENT 

CONFERENCE AND ADR DEADLINES, AND (2) 

CONTINUING LOCAL PATENT RULE DISCLOSURES; 

AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

Civil Case No.: CV 10-0048 MMC 

2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between plaintiff Fortinet, Inc. (“Fortinet”) and 

defendants Trend Micro Incorporated, a California corporation, Trend Micro Incorporated, a 

Japanese Corporation, and Trend Micro Incorporated, a Taiwanese corporation (collectively, 

“Trend Micro”), by and through their counsel of record, as follows: 

WHEREAS, on March 2, 2010, Trend Micro filed a Motion to Dismiss the Complaint 

pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (“Motion to Dismiss”); 

WHEREAS, on March 15, 2010, the parties filed a Stipulated Motion for Order (1) 

Vacating and Resetting Case Management Conference and ADR Deadlines, and (2) 

Continuing Local Patent Rule Disclosures (“Stipulated Motion”), which provided that the 

Case Management Conference and related deadlines and disclosures would occur after the 

Court’s ruling on the Motion to Dismiss; 

WHEREAS, on March 18, 2010, this Court granted the Stipulated Order except that 

the Case Management Conference was continued to May 28, 2010;

WHEREAS, on April 7, 2010, this Court issued an Order setting a schedule for 

supplemental briefing and continuing the hearing on the Motion to Dismiss to May 14, 2010; 

WHEREAS, under the current schedule, the parties must meet and confer pursuant to 

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(f) no later than May 7, 2010, prior to the date set for the 

hearing on the Motion to Dismiss; 

WHEREAS, the Parties have met and conferred and jointly believe that the ruling on 

Trend Micro’s Motion to Dismiss will clarify the matters at issue and the proper scope of 

discovery in this case, if any, and thus it will be more efficient and productive for the Court 

to:

(1) vacate the initial Case Management Conference currently scheduled for May 28, 

2010, and reset the Initial Case Management Conference for 30 days after the Court rules on 

Trend Micro’s Motion to Dismiss, if the Court denies the Motion to Dismiss; 

Case 3:10-cv-00048-MMC Document 64 Filed 04/13/10 Page 2 of 4
SECOND STIPULATED MOTION FOR ORDER (1) 

VACATING AND RESETTING CASE MANAGEMENT 

CONFERENCE AND ADR DEADLINES, AND (2) 

CONTINUING LOCAL PATENT RULE DISCLOSURES; 

AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

Civil Case No.: CV 10-0048 MMC 

3

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

(2) reset the ADR and Rule 26-related deadlines in an Order Resetting the Initial 

Case Management Conference issued after the Court rules on Trend Micro’s Motion to 

Dismiss; and 

(3) order that the parties’ obligations to begin making their respective Patent 

Disclosures under the Local Patent Rules are continued until after the Court holds the initial 

Case Management Conference, as contemplated above and in the Patent Local Rules.

WHEREAS, there is no schedule set in this case beyond the dates set for the initial 

Case Management Conference and further briefing and the hearing on Trend Micro’s 

Motion to Dismiss, therefore, this Stipulated Motion will not impact the schedule in this 

case after those dates; 

NOW THEREFORE, the Parties, by and through their undersigned counsel and 

pursuant to the above stipulations, hereby jointly move the Court for an Order:

(1) vacating the Initial Case Management Conference currently scheduled for May 

28, 2010, and resetting the Initial Case Management Conference for 30 days after the Court 

rules on Trend Micro’s Motion to Dismiss, if the Court denies the Motion to Dismiss; 

(2) resetting the ADR deadlines and the deadlines for the parties to meet and confer 

regarding initial disclosures and discovery plan, to file a Rule 26(f) Report, to complete 

initial disclosures, and to file a Joint Case Management Statement, in an Order that the Court 

will issue if the Court denies Trend Micro’s Motion to Dismiss; and 

(3) providing that the parties’ obligations to begin making their respective Patent 

Disclosures under the Local Patent Rules shall begin after the Court holds the Initial Case 

Management Conference, as contemplated above and in the Patent Local Rules. 

Case 3:10-cv-00048-MMC Document 64 Filed 04/13/10 Page 3 of 4
SECOND STIPULATED MOTION FOR ORDER (1) 

VACATING AND RESETTING CASE MANAGEMENT 

CONFERENCE AND ADR DEADLINES, AND (2) 

CONTINUING LOCAL PATENT RULE DISCLOSURES; 

AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

Civil Case No.: CV 10-0048 MMC 

4

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DATED: April 12, 2010 WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI 

 By: /s/ Stefani E. Shanberg

Stefani E. Shanberg 

Attorneys for Plaintiff FORTINET, INC. 

DATED: April 12, 2010 COVINGTON & BURLING LLP 

 By: /s/ Andrew C. Byrnes

Andrew C. Byrnes 

Attorneys for Defendants 

TREND MICRO INCORPORATED (a California 

corporation); TREND MICRO INCORPORATED 

(a Japanese corporation); and TREND MICRO 

INCORPORATED (a Taiwanese corporation) 

PURSUANT TO THE PARTIES’ STIPULATED MOTION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED:________________________ ________________________________________ 

 The Honorable Maxine M. Chesney 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 

April 13, 2010

Case 3:10-cv-00048-MMC Document 64 Filed 04/13/10 Page 4 of 4