Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-00820/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-00820-9/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Leonard Johnson
Plaintiff
Humberto Rodriguez
Defendant

Document Text:

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Plaintiff Leonard Johnson is proceeding in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), the parties consented to the jurisdiction of the United States magistrate 

judge. Local Rule 302.

This action is proceeding against Defendant Humberto Rodriguez for excessive force in 

violation of the Eighth Amendment. This matter was set for a telephonic hearing on June 12, 2015,

for purposes of pretrial confirmation hearing. The matter is now set for a four day jury trial beginning 

on August 18, 2015, at 8:30 a.m.

In preparation of trial, the parties are required to file Pretrial Statements in accordance with the 

schedule set forth herein. In addition to the matters already required to be addressed in the pretrial 

statement in accordance with Local Rule 281, Plaintiff will be required to make a particularized 

LEONARD JOHNSON,

 Plaintiff,

v.

HUMBERTO RODRIGUEZ,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: 1:12-cv-00820-SAB (PC)

TRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER

Telephonic Trial Confirmation Hearing:

June 12, 2015, at 9:30 a.m.

Telephonic Motions in Limine Hearing:

August 6, 2015, at 2:00 p.m.

Jury Trial: August 18, 2015, at 8:30 a.m. in 

Courtroom 9 (SAB); 4 Days

Case 1:12-cv-00820-SAB Document 40 Filed 03/23/15 Page 1 of 12
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

showing in order to obtain the attendance of witnesses. The procedures and requirements for making 

such a showing are outlined in detail below.

1. Pretrial Statement (Local Rule 281)

The parties shall file a joint pretrial statement no later than June 8, 2015. The Telephonic 

Pretrial Confirmation hearing will be held June 12, 2015, before the United States Magistrate Judge 

Stanley A. Boone in Courtroom 9.

The form and content of the Pretrial Statement must comply with Local Rule 281. Pursuant to 

Local Rule 281(b), the Pretrial Statement shall including the following matters, under the following 

captions, and in the following order:

(1) Jurisdiction – Venue. The factual and statutory basis of federal jurisdiction and venue 

and whether there is any dispute concerning jurisdiction or venue;

(2) Jury – Non-Jury. Whether the party has demanded a jury trial of all or any of the 

issues or, if not, whether a demand for jury trial made by any other party is conceded or contested;

(3) Undisputed Facts. A plain, concise statement of the facts that are undisputed;

(4) Disputed Factual Issues. A plain, concise statement of each fact (and any related 

essential facts) that the party claims or concedes to be in dispute;

(5) Disputed Evidentiary Issues. A plain, concise summary of any reasonably anticipated 

disputes concerning admissibility of live and deposition testimony, physical and demonstrative 

evidence and the use of special technology at trial, including computer animation, video discs, and 

other high technology, and a statement whether each such dispute should be resolved by motion in 

limine, briefed in the trial, brief, or addressed in some other manner;

(6) Special Factual Information in Certain Actions. In addition to the facts and issues 

described in (3) through (5), the following special information with respect to the following types of 

actions shall be specified within either the disputed or undisputed facts sections as appropriate:

***

(iv) In tort actions for personal injury, wrongful death or property damage:

(A) The date, place, and general nature of the incident; the particular acts, 

omissions, or conditions constituting the basis for liability; the particular acts, omissions or conditions 

Case 1:12-cv-00820-SAB Document 40 Filed 03/23/15 Page 2 of 12
3

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

constituting the basis of any defense; any statute, ordinance, or regulation violated by either party; the 

applicability of the doctrine of strict liability or res ipsa loquitur.

(B) Each plaintiff’s age; injuries sustained; any prior injury or condition worsened; 

periods of hospitalization; medical expenses and estimated future medical expenses; the period of total 

and/or partial disability; annual, monthly, or weekly earnings before the incident; earnings loss to date 

and estimated diminution of future earnings power; property damage; general damages; punitive 

damages;

(7) Relief Sought. The elements of monetary damage, if any, and the specific nature of any 

other relief sought; 

(8) Points of Law. A statement of the legal theory or theories of recovery or of defense 

and of any points of law (substantive or procedural) that are or may reasonably be expected to be in 

controversy, citing the pertinent statues, ordinances, regulations, cases, and other authorities relied 

upon. Extended legal argument is not required in the pretrial statement;

(9) Abandoned Issues. A statement of all issues raised by the pleadings that have been 

abandoned, including, for example, claims for relief and affirmative defenses;

(10) Witnesses. A list (names and addresses) of all prospective witnesses, whether offered 

in person or by deposition or interrogatory, designating those who are expert witnesses. Only 

witnesses so listed will be permitted to testify at the trial, except as may be otherwise provided in the 

pretrial order;

(11) Exhibits – Schedules and Summaries. A list of documents or other exhibits that the 

party expects to offer at trial. Only exhibits so listed will be permitted to be offered at trial except as 

may be otherwise provided in the pretrial order.

(12) Discovery Documents. A list of all portions of depositions, answers to interrogatories, 

and responses to requests for admission that the party expects to offer at trial;

(13) Further Discovery or Motions. Any requests for further discovery or pretrial 

motions. Whether discovery and/or law and motion has been terminated by a Court order, counsel 

shall set forth the grounds for relief from that order and why a motion to be relieved was not made 

Case 1:12-cv-00820-SAB Document 40 Filed 03/23/15 Page 3 of 12
4

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

before the date ordered in the status conference for termination. Motions for relief at pretrial are not 

favored and will ordinarily be denied unless the moving party makes a strong showing;

(14) Stipulations. Any stipulations requested or offered for pretrial or trial purposes;

(15) Amendments – Dismissals. Any requested amendments to pleadings, dismissals, 

additions or subtractions of parties, or dispositions as to defaulting parties;

(16) Settlement Negotiations. A statement whether settlement negotiations between parties 

and/or a court settlement conference under L.R. 270 would be helpful;

(17) Agreed Statements. A statement whether presentation of all or part of the action upon 

an Agreed Statement of Facts is feasible and advisable;

(18) Separate Trial of Issues. A statement whether separate trial of any of the issues is 

feasible and advisable;

(19) Impartial Experts – Limitation of Experts. A statement whether appointment by the 

Court of impartial expert witnesses or limitation of the number of experts witnesses is advisable;

(20) Attorneys’ Fees. A statement whether attorney’s fees are sought and the time and 

manner in which they are to be ascertained. See L.R. 293;

(21) Trial Exhibits. Any special handling of trial exhibits and a statement of advisability of 

court retention of exhibits pending appeal decision. See L.R. 138(e);

(22) Trial Protective Order. Whether a trial protective order will be sought pursuant to 

L.R. 141.1(b)(2); and

(23) Miscellaneous. Any other appropriate comments, suggestions, or information that 

might aid in the disposition of the action, including references to any matters set forth in Fed. R. Civ. 

P. 16(c).

A party’s failure to comply with any of these pretrial statement requirements may result 

in the Court’s excluding witnesses, evidence and/or legal issues related to the case at trial.

2. Plaintiff’s Witness Procedures:

Because the Plaintiff is an incarcerated state prisoner, the plaintiff must comply with certain 

procedures associated with introducing evidence and bringing witnesses to trial. 

///

Case 1:12-cv-00820-SAB Document 40 Filed 03/23/15 Page 4 of 12
5

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Plaintiff must be prepared to introduce evidence to prove each of the alleged facts that support 

the claims raised in the lawsuit. In general, there are two kinds of trial evidence: (1) exhibits and (2) 

the testimony of witnesses. It is Plaintiff’s responsibility to produce all of the evidence to prove his 

case, whether that evidence is in the form of exhibits or witness testimony. If Plaintiff wants to call 

witnesses to testify, he must follow certain procedures to ensure that the witnesses will be at the trial 

and available to testify. Plaintiff is advised that failure to comply with the procedures set forth below 

may result in the preclusion of any and all witnesses named in his pretrial statement. Notwithstanding 

the requirements set forth herein, a motion for the attendance of incarcerated witnesses will only be 

granted by the Court if the moving party has shown the witnesses have relevant information and the 

Court determines the witnesses’ presence will substantially further the resolution of the case. Wiggins 

v. Cnty. Of Alameda, 717 F.2d 466, 468 n.1 (9th Cir. 1983). The decision to grant or deny the motion 

is within the discretion of the trial judge. 

The following procedures are required to ensure the attendance of Plaintiff’s witnesses at trial. 

The witnesses may be incarcerated or unincarcerated and willing or unwilling to testify voluntarily. 

a. Procedures for Obtaining Attendance of Incarcerated Witnesses Who Agree to 

Testify Voluntarily

An incarcerated witness who agrees voluntarily to attend trial to give testimony cannot come to 

court unless the Court orders the warden or other custodian to permit the witness to be transported to 

court. The Court will not issue such an order unless it is satisfied that the prospective witness has 

actual knowledge of relevant facts.

A party intending to introduce the testimony of incarcerated witnesses who have agreed 

voluntarily to attend the trial must serve and file a written motion for a court order requiring that such 

witnesses be brought to court at the time of trial. The motion must: (1) state the name, address, and 

prison identification number of each such witness; and (2) be accompanied by declarations showing 

that each witness is willing to testify and that each witness has actual knowledge of relevant facts. 

The motion should be entitled “Motion for Attendance of Incarcerated Witnesses.”

The willingness of the prospective witness can be shown in one of two ways: (1) the party 

himself can swear by declaration under penalty of perjury that the prospective witness has informed 

Case 1:12-cv-00820-SAB Document 40 Filed 03/23/15 Page 5 of 12
6

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

the party that he or she is willing to testify voluntarily without being subpoenaed, in which declaration 

the party must state when and where the prospective witness informed the party of this willingness; or 

(2) the party can serve and file a declaration, signed under penalty of perjury by the prospective 

witness, in which the witness states that he or she is willing to testify without being subpoenaed.

The prospective witness’s actual knowledge of relevant facts can be shown in one of two ways: 

(1) if the party has actual firsthand knowledge that the prospective witness was an eyewitness or an 

ear-witness to the relevant facts (e.g., if an incident occurred in Plaintiff’s cell and, at the time, 

Plaintiff saw that a cellmate was present and observed the incident, Plaintiff may swear to the 

cellmate’s ability to testify), the party himself can swear by declaration under penalty of perjury that 

the prospective witness has actual knowledge; or (2) the party can serve and file a declaration signed 

under penalty of perjury by the prospective witness in which the witness describes the relevant facts to 

which the prospective witness was an eye or ear witness. Whether the declaration is made by the party 

or by the prospective witness, it must be specific about the incident, when and where it occurred, who 

was present, and how the prospective witness happened to be in a position to see or to hear what 

occurred at the time it occurred.

The Court will review and rule on the motion for attendance of incarcerated witnesses, 

specifying which prospective witnesses must be brought to court. Subsequently, the Court will issue 

the order necessary to cause the witness’s custodian to bring the witness to court. 

Plaintiff shall file any motions for the attendance of incarcerated witnesses who are willing to 

testify, on or before April 27, 2015. Oppositions, if any, must be filed on or before May 11, 2015. 

After the filing deadlines, the Court will take the matter under submission and rule accordingly. If the 

Court finds the need to set a hearing, the Court will notify the parties. 

b. Procedures for Obtaining Attendance of Incarcerated Witnesses Who Refuse to 

Testify Voluntarily 

If a party seeks to obtain the attendance of incarcerated witnesses who refuse to testify 

voluntarily, the party must submit a motion for the attendance of such witnesses. An incarcerated 

witness cannot come to come unless the Court orders the warden or other custodian to permit the 

witness to be transported to court. The Court will not issue an order unless it is satisfied that the 

Case 1:12-cv-00820-SAB Document 40 Filed 03/23/15 Page 6 of 12
7

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

prospective witness has actual knowledge of relevant facts. In addition, the party must indicate in the 

motion that the incarcerated witnesses are not willing to testify voluntarily.

The motion must: (1) state the name, address, and prison identification number of each such 

witness; and (2) be accompanied by a showing that each witness has actual knowledge of relevant 

facts. The motion should be entitled “Motion for Attendance of Incarcerated Witnesses.”

The prospective witness’s actual knowledge of relevant facts can be shown in one of two ways: 

(1) if the party has actual firsthand knowledge that the prospective witness was an eyewitness or an 

ear-witness to the relevant facts (e.g., if an incident occurred in Plaintiff’s cell and, at the time, 

Plaintiff saw that a cellmate was present and observed the incident, Plaintiff may swear to the 

cellmate’s ability to testify), the party himself can swear by declaration under penalty of perjury that 

the prospective witness has actual knowledge; or (2) the party can serve and file a declaration signed 

under penalty of perjury by the prospective witness in which the witness describes the relevant facts to 

which the prospective witness was an eye or ear witness. Whether the declaration is made by the party 

or by the prospective witness, it must be specific about the incident, when and where it occurred, who 

was present, and how the prospective witness happened to be in a position to see or to hear what 

occurred at the time it occurred.

The Court will review and rule on the motion for attendance of incarcerated witnesses, 

specifying which prospective witnesses must be brought to court. Subsequently, the Court will issue 

the order necessary to cause the witness’s custodian to bring the witness to court. 

Plaintiff shall file any motions for the attendance of incarcerated witnesses who are willing to 

testify, on or before April 27, 2015. Oppositions, if any, must be filed on or before May 11, 2015. As 

previously stated, after the filing deadlines, the matter will be taken under submission and the Court 

will rule accordingly. If the Court finds the need to set a hearing, the Court will notify the parties. 

c. Procedures for Obtaining Attendance of Unincarcerated Witnesses Who Agree to 

Testify Voluntarily 

It is the responsibility of the party who has secured an unincarcerated witness’s voluntary 

attendance to notify the witness of the time and date of trial. No action need be sought or obtained 

from the Court. However, the parties are advised that if a witness subsequently refuses to testify prior 

Case 1:12-cv-00820-SAB Document 40 Filed 03/23/15 Page 7 of 12
8

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

to trial, the Court will not continue the trial date to allow the party to compel the attendance of the 

witness at trial, absent a showing of extraordinary circumstances. 

d. Procedures for Obtaining Attendance of Unincarcerated Witnesses Who Refuse to 

Testify Voluntarily 

If a prospective witness is not incarcerated, and he or she refuses to testify voluntarily, the 

witness must be served with a subpoena. Fed. R. Civ. P. 45. In addition, the party seeking the 

witness’s presence must tender an appropriate sum of money for the witness. Id. In the case of an 

unincarcerated witness, the appropriate sum of money is the daily witness fee of $40.00 plus the 

witness’s travel expenses. 28 U.S.C. § 1821. 

If Plaintiff wishes to obtain the attendance of one or more unincarcerated witnesses who refuse 

to testify voluntarily, Plaintiff must first notify the Court in writing of the name and location of each 

unincarcerated witness. The Court will calculate the travel expense for each unincarcerated witness 

and notify Plaintiff of the amount(s). Plaintiff must then, for each witness, submit a money order 

made payable to the witness for the full amount of the witness’s travel expenses plus the daily witness 

fee of $40.00. The subpoena will not be served upon the unincarcerated witness by the United States 

Marshal unless the money order is tendered to the Court. Because no statute authorizes the use of 

public funds for these expenses in civil cases, the tendering of witness fees and travel expenses is 

required even if the party was granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis.

If Plaintiff wishes to have the United States Marshal serve any unincarcerated witnesses who 

refuse to testify voluntarily, Plaintiff must submit the money orders to the Court no later than April 27, 

2015. In order to ensure timely submission of the money orders, Plaintiff must notify the Court of the 

names and locations of his witnesses, on or before April 20, 2015. 

3. Motions In Limine Hearing and Briefing Schedule

Any party may file a motion in limine, which is a procedural mechanism to limit in advance 

testimony or evidence in a particular area. United States v. Heller, 551 F.3d 1108, 1111 (9th Cir. 

2009). In the case of a jury trial, the Court’s ruling gives Plaintiff and Defendants’ counsel advance 

notice of the scope of certain evidence so that admissibility is settled before attempted use of the 

evidence before the jury. Id. at 1111-1112. Although the Federal Rules do not explicitly provide for 

Case 1:12-cv-00820-SAB Document 40 Filed 03/23/15 Page 8 of 12
9

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

the filing of motions in limine, the Court has the inherent power to hear and decide such motions as a 

function of its duty to expeditiously manage trials by eliminating evidence that is clearly inadmissible 

for any purpose. Luce v. United States, 469 U.S. 38, 41 n.4 (1984).

This Court further orders the parties to file motions in limine only with respect to important, 

critical issues. Motions in limine on abstract evidentiary issues or issues more appropriately addressed 

by the Court on a case-by-case basis (such as a motion in limine to exclude all irrelevant evidence) 

will be looked upon with disfavor. After satisfying the forgoing, if a motion in limine still seeks to 

address the admissibility of a particular trial exhibit, the exhibit in question must be referenced by the 

trial exhibit number so that the court can review the actual exhibit for admissibility. If the exhibit 

sought to be admitted would not be in the court’s possession one week prior to the motion in limine 

hearing, then the exhibit in question must be included in the motion. Failure to properly reference or 

attach an exhibit in the motion will result in the request being denied.

The parties shall not file separate motions in limine for every issue presented to the Court. 

Rather, if a party wishes to file a motion in limine, each party shall file one consolidated motion in

limine which is subdivided into separate sections for each issue setting for the legal authority and 

analysis. The responding party shall file one opposition in response addressing each motion in limine 

issue in a separate section. 

The deadline for service and filing of motions in limine is July 14, 2015. The deadline for 

service and filing of an opposition, if any, is due July 28, 2015. A telephonic motions in limine 

hearing will be held on August 6, 2015, at 2:00 p.m., in Courtroom 9, before the undersigned. 

Counsel for defendants is directed to arrange for telephone contact with Plaintiff and to contact the 

Courtroom Deputy, Mamie Hernandez, at (559) 499-5672, prior to the hearing date, to receive 

instructions regarding the conference call.

4. Pre-Marked and Exchange of Exhibits

As noted below, no later than July 16, 2015, the parties shall exchange their final exhibit list 

and pre-marked exhibits, to be addressed at the August 6, 2015, motion in limine hearing. 

All exhibits must be pre-marked with an exhibit sticker or other legible numbering/lettering. 

This requirement that exhibits be pre-marked applies both to evidence that will be formally admitted 

Case 1:12-cv-00820-SAB Document 40 Filed 03/23/15 Page 9 of 12
10

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

into evidence as well as any other exhibits that will be presented in any manner during trial, such as 

“demonstrative” evidence. Each individual “original” exhibit that will be submitted to the jury must 

be stapled/fastened so that the exhibit does not become separated. Further, exhibits submitted to the 

jury must be pre-marked on the front page only in the manner described above. Impeachment or 

rebuttal evidence need not be pre-marked. However, evidence of bias, extrinsically introduced, must 

be pre-marked.

a. Joint Exhibits: Joint exhibits are those exhibits which all parties agree may be 

admitted into evidence without the need for laying a proper foundation under 

the Federal Rules of Evidence. Joint exhibits must be pre-marked with the 

designation “J-[Number]” (e.g., J-1, J-2). Those exhibits may be introduced at 

any time during the course of the trial. However, joint exhibits are not 

“automatically” admitted into evidence: at least one of the parties must admit a 

joint exhibit into evidence. If an exhibit is not admitted by any party, the 

exhibit will not be given to the jury despite its “joint” designation as an exhibit.

b. Plaintiff’s Exhibits: Plaintiff’s exhibits must be pre-marked using numbers

beginning with 1 (e.g., 1, 2, etc.). 

c. Defendant’s Exhibits: Defendant’s exhibits must be pre-marked using letters

beginning with A (e.g., A, B, C...AA, BB, CC...AAA, BBB, CCC, etc.).

No later than July 16, 2015, the parties shall exchange their proposed exhibits to allow for the 

parties to file objections to be addressed at the motion in limine hearing on August 6, 2015. 

Further instructions on the submission and use of exhibits during trial will be provided in the pretrial 

order in this matter. 

The parties are required to submit trial exhibits for each party in binders. Counsel shall submit 

three (3) complete, legible and identical sets of exhibits in binders on or about August 11, 2015. 

Within the binders, the pre-marked exhibits must be separately tabbed and assembled in sequential 

order. All of Plaintiff’s exhibits shall be marked sequentially beginning with 1 (e.g., 1, 2, etc.). All of 

Defendants’ exhibits shall be marked sequentially beginning with A (e.g., A, B, C...AA, BB, 

CC...AAA, BBB, CCC, etc.). The binders shall be delivered to Courtroom Deputy Clerk Mamie 

Case 1:12-cv-00820-SAB Document 40 Filed 03/23/15 Page 10 of 12
11

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Hernandez prior to trial at a date set forth in the pretrial order. 

CONCLUSION AND ORDER

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 

1. This matter is set for telephonic pretrial confirmation hearing before the Honorable 

Stanley A. Boone on June 12, 2015, at 9:30 a.m. in Courtroom 9;

2. Motions in limine are due on or before July 11, 2015. Oppositions to the motions in 

limine are due on or before July 28, 2015. This matter is set for motion in limine hearing before the 

Honorable Stanley A. Boone on August 6, at 2:00 p.m., in Courtroom 9;

3. This matter is set for jury trial before the Honorable Stanley A. Boone on August 18, 

2015, at 8:30 a.m. in Courtroom 9;

4. Counsel for Defendants is required to arrange for the participation of Plaintiff in the 

telephonic trial confirmation hearing and motion in limine hearing and to contact Courtroom Deputy, 

Mamie Hernandez, at (559) 499-5672, prior to the hearing date, to receive instructions regarding the 

conference call;

5. The parties shall file their joint pretrial statement on or before June 8, 2015; 

7. In addition to electronically filing their pretrial statement, Defendants shall e-mail the 

pretrial statement to: saborders@caed.uscourts.gov;

8. If Plaintiff intends to call incarcerated witnesses at time of trial, Plaintiff shall serve and 

file a motion for attendance of incarcerated witnesses as described in this order on or before April 27, 

2015;

//

//

//

//

//

//

//

Case 1:12-cv-00820-SAB Document 40 Filed 03/23/15 Page 11 of 12
12

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

9. The opposition to the motion for the attendance of incarcerated witnesses, if any, shall 

be filed on or before May 11, 2015; and

10. If Plaintiff wishes to obtain the attendance of unincarcerated witnesses who refuse to 

testify voluntarily, Plaintiff must notify the Court of their names and locations on or before April 20, 

2015, and Plaintiff must submit the money orders, as described in subsection 4 of this order, to the 

Court on or before April 27, 2015.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 23, 2015 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:12-cv-00820-SAB Document 40 Filed 03/23/15 Page 12 of 12