Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-01515/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-01515-22/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Stryker Corporation
Counter Claimant
Synvasive Technology, Inc.
Counter Defendant

Document Text:

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL; ORDER 

CASE NO. 2:05-CV-01515-WBS-DAD AND CASE NO. 2:06-CV-00049-WBS-DAD

TOWNSEND AND TOWNSEND AND CREW LLP 

THEODORE T. HERHOLD (State Bar No. 122895) 

ttherhold@townsend.com

MATTHEW R. HULSE (State Bar No. 209490) 

mrhulse@townsend.com

ROBERT D. TADLOCK (State Bar No. 238479) 

rdtadlock@townsend.com

379 Lytton Avenue, Palo Alto, California 94301 

Telephone: (650) 326-2400; Facsimile: (650) 326-2422 

Attorneys for Plaintiff/Counterdefendant 

SYNVASIVE TECHNOLOGY, INC. 

Morgan W. Tovey (SBN 136242) 

William Ross Overend (SBN 180209) 

REED SMITH LLP 

Two Embarcadero Center, Suite 2000 

San Francisco, CA 94111-3922 

Telephone: (415) 543-8700; Facsimile: (415) 391-8269 

Timothy J. Malloy (admitted pro hac vice) 

Gregory J. Vogler (admitted pro hac vice) 

Robert A. Surrette (admitted pro hac vice) 

William B. Gont (admitted pro hac vice) 

McANDREWS HELD & MALLOY 

500 West Madison Street, Suite 3400 

Chicago, IL 60661 

Telephone: (312) 775-8000; Facsimile: (312) 775-8100 

Attorneys for Defendant/Counterclaimant 

STRYKER CORPORATION 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SACRAMENTO DIVISION 

SYNVASIVE TECHNOLOGY, INC., 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

STRYKER CORPORATION, 

Defendant. 

 

Case No. 2:05-CV-01515-WBS-DAD 

(Consolidated) 

SYNVASIVE TECHNOLOGY, INC., 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

STRYKER CORPORATION, 

Defendant. 

 

Case No. 2:06-CV-00049-WBS-DAD 

(Consolidated) 

AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS. 

 

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL; ORDER 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 2:05-cv-01515-WBS-DAD Document 234 Filed 05/07/07 Page 1 of 2
 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL; ORDER - 1 -

CASE NO. 2:05-CV-01515-WBS-DAD AND CASE NO. 2:06-CV-00049-WBS-DAD 

The parties to this action have executed a settlement agreement resolving all claims in the 

action. Therefore, pursuant to Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, IT IS HEREBY 

STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto that the above-captioned action be and is hereby 

dismissed with prejudice. Each party shall bear its own attorney's fees and costs. 

DATED: May 4, 2007 Respectfully submitted, 

TOWNSEND and TOWNSEND and CREW LLP 

By: /s/ Matthew R. Hulse 

Matthew R. Hulse 

Attorneys for Plaintiff/Counterdefendant 

SYNVASIVE TECHNOLOGY, INC. 

DATED: May 4, 2007 McANDREWS HELD & MALLOY 

By: /s/ Robert A. Surrette (as authorized on May 4, 2007)

Robert A. Surrette 

Attorneys for Defendant/Counterclaimant 

STRYKER CORPORATION 

ORDER 

Based on the foregoing stipulation, the action is hereby dismissed with prejudice. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: May 4, 2007 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 2:05-cv-01515-WBS-DAD Document 234 Filed 05/07/07 Page 2 of 2