Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-00334/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-00334-2/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Larry Tamaklo
Plaintiff
Tybrin Corporation
Defendant

Document Text:

Benjamin E. Hall #219924

Mark D. Kruthers #179750

Nathan W. Powell #232516

DOWLING, AARON & KEELER, INC.

8080 North Palm Avenue, Third Floor

P.O. Box 28902

Fresno, California 93729-8902

Tel: (559) 432-4500

Fax: (559) 432-4590

Attorneys for Defendant TYBRIN CORPORATION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LARRY TAMAKLO, an individual

Plaintiff,

v.

TYBRIN CORPORATION, a Florida

corporation, and DOES 1 THROUGH 10,

inclusive,

Defendant.

Case No. 1:06-CV-00334-AWI-SMS

STIPULATION AND ORDER 

FOR DISMISSAL

Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(ii), the parties hereby stipulate to the dismissal

of this action with prejudice, each party to bear its own costs.

Dated: March __9_, 2007 REHWALD, GLASNER & CHALEFF

By: /s/ Lawrence M. Glasner

LAWRENCE M. GLASNER

Attorneys for Plaintiff,

LARRY TAMAKLO

Dated: March _15_, 2007 DOWLING, AARON & KEELER INC.

By: /s/ Benjamin E. Hall

Case 1:06-cv-00334-AWI -SMS Document 22 Filed 03/16/07 Page 1 of 2
FirmN

a

m

e1_1

,

Firm

L

e

g

alStatus1_1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR DISMISSAL

IN C O RPO RATED

8080 N . Pa lm Avenue

T h ird Floor

F resno, C aliforn ia 9371 1

BENJAMIN E. HALL 

Attorneys for Defendant, 

TYBRIN CORPORATION

ORDER

The parties seek dismissal of this action pursuant to Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure. Rule 41(a)(1), in relevant part, reads:

an action may be dismissed by the plaintiff without order of court (i) by filing a

notice of dismissal at any time before service by the adverse party of an answer or

of a motion for summary judgment, whichever first occurs, or (ii) by filing a

stipulation of dismissal signed by all parties who have appeared in the action.

Unless otherwise stated in the notice of dismissal or stipulation, the dismissal is

without prejudice, except that a notice of dismissal operates as an adjudication

upon the merits when filed by a plaintiff who has once dismissed in any court of

the United States or of any state an action based on or including the same claim.

Because Plaintiff has filed a stipulation for dismissal with prejudice as to all parties under Rule

41(a)(1)(ii) that is signed by all parties who have made an appearance, this case has terminated.

See Fed. R. Civ. Pro. 41(a)(1)(ii).

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED and the Clerk of the

Court is DIRECTED to close this case in light of the parties’ filed and signed Rule 41(a)(1)(ii)

Stipulation For Dismissal With Prejudice. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 16, 2007 /s/ Anthony W. Ishii 

0m8i78 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-00334-AWI -SMS Document 22 Filed 03/16/07 Page 2 of 2