Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_17-mc-80107/USCOURTS-cand-4_17-mc-80107-2/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
John Doe
Objector
Ilyas Khrapunov
Plaintiff
Pavel Prosyankin
Objector

Document Text:

1 STIPULATION AND ORDER SETTING 

BRIEFING SCHEDULE

Case No. 17-mc-80107-KAW

[3203997.1] 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

BOERSCH SHAPIRO LLP 

David W. Shapiro (State Bar No. 219265) 

Dshapiro@boerschshapiro.com 

Martha Boersch (State Bar No. 126569) 

Mboersch@boerschshapiro.com 

Lara Kollios (State Bar No. 235395) 

Lkollios@boerschshapiro.com 

1611 Telegraph Ave., Ste. 806 

Oakland, CA 94612 

Telephone: (415) 500-6640 

Attorneys for Applicant 

ILYAS KHRAPUNOV 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

OAKLAND DIVISION 

IN RE APPLICATION OF ILYAS 

KHRAPUNOV PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 

1782 FOR THE TAKING OF DISCOVERY 

FOR USE IN A FOREIGN PROCEEDING, 

 Applicant. 

Case No. 4:17-mc-80107-HSG (KAW) 

STIPULATION AND ORDER SETTING 

BRIEFING SCHEDULE 

Judge: Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. 

Date: March 1, 2018 

Time: 2:00 p.m. 

 Applicant Ilyas Khrapunov, by his counsel Martha Boersch, and non-Parties Pavel Prosyankin 

and John Doe (collectively “Objectors”), by their counsel Jeffrey L. Bornstein, hereby stipulate and 

agree as follows: 

1. On October 1, 2017, Objectors Pavel Prosyankin and John Doe filed a motion to quash 

the subpoena Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore issued on August 25, 2017, to Google, Inc. (Dkt. 

8). Ilyas Khrapunov applied for that subpoena pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1782. 

2. After briefing and oral argument on the motion to quash, Judge Westmore issued an 

order on November 22, 2017, granting in part and denying in part the Objectors’ motion to quash. In 

the order, she granted the Objectors 15 days in which to file a motion in this Court for relief from her 

Case 4:17-mc-80107-HSG Document 37 Filed 12/13/17 Page 1 of 3
2 STIPULATION AND ORDER SETTING 

BRIEFING SCHEDULE

Case No. 17-mc-80107-KAW

[3203997.1] 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

order. (Dkt. 29). 

3. On December 6, 2017, the Objectors filed a Motion for De Novo Determination of 

Dispositive Order of Magistrate Judge concurrently with an Administrative Motion to Augment 

Record and Set Briefing Schedule. (Dkts. 32 and 33). The Objectors have noticed March 1, 2018, as 

the hearing date for their motions. 

4. The parties have conferred and have agreed to the following briefing schedule: 

 Applicant Khrapunov’s responses shall be filed on or before January 24, 2018. 

 Any replies by the Objectors shall be filed on or before February 14, 2018. 

 5. This stipulated briefing schedule is sought due to the press of other matters. The 

proposed briefing schedule does not alter the noticed hearing date. 

 6. The proposed briefing schedule also does not alter the Stay issued by the Magistrate 

Judge in her November 22, 2017, order, which Objectors have argued should remain in effect for 10 

days following a dispositive ruling by this Court on Objectors’ Motion for De Novo Determination. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

Dated: December 13, 2017 BOERSCH SHAPIRO LLP 

_/s/ Martha Boersch______________ 

Martha Boersch 

Attorney for Applicant 

Ilyas Khrapunov 

Dated: December 13, 2017 ROSEN BIEN GALVAN & GRUNFELD LLP 

_/s/ Jeffrey L. Bornstein____________ 

Jeffrey L. Bornstein 

Attorney for Objectors 

Pavel Prosyankin and John Doe 

Case 4:17-mc-80107-HSG Document 37 Filed 12/13/17 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[3203997.1] 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

 IT

cause app

Administ

24, 2018

does not 

which sh

 IT

Dated: D

 

 

T IS HEREB

pearing, App

trative Motio

. Any replie

alter the Sta

hall remain in

T IS SO ORD

December 13

BY ORDERE

plicant Ilyas 

on to Augme

es by the Obj

ay issued by 

n effect. 

DERED. 

3, 2017 

 

 

ED, based o

Khrapunov

ent Record a

jectors shall

the Magistra

3 

ORDER 

n the forego

’s opposition

and Set Brief

l be filed on 

ate Judge in 

 ____

 HON

 Unit

STIPULAT

oing stipulati

ns to the Mo

fing Schedu

or before Fe

her Novemb

__________

N. HAYWO

ted States D

TION AND 

BRIEF

Case No. 1

ion of the pa

otion for De 

le is due on 

ebruary 14, 2

ber 22, 2017

___________

OOD S. GILL

istrict Judge

ORDER SE

FING SCHE

17-mc-80107

arties and go

Novo Revie

or before Ja

2018. This O

7, order (Dkt

__________

LIAM, JR. 

e

TTING 

EDULE

7-KAW

od 

ew and 

anuary 

Order 

t. 29), 

___ 

Case 4:17-mc-80107-HSG Document 37 Filed 12/13/17 Page 3 of 3