Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-05935/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-05935-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Rose Everette
Plaintiff
Darryl Milburn
Defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

PATRICIA BELL,

Plaintiff,

v.

DARRYL MILBURN,

Defendant.

Case No.16-cv-05902-JSC 

ORDER RELATING CASES AND 

ADVISING PLAINTIFFS RE: LEGAL 

HELP CENTER 

ROSE EVERETTE,

Plaintiff,

v.

DARRYL MILBURN,

Defendant.

Case No.16-cv-05935-JSC

Defendant’s Administrative Motion to Relate the above-captioned actions is now pending 

before the Court. (Dkt. No. 9.) The time for filing an opposition or statement of support has 

passed. As the judge assigned to the earliest-filed action, Bell v. Milburn, No. 16-5902 JSC, the 

Court finds that the more recently filed case, Everett v. Milburn, No. 16-5935 EDL, is related and 

shall reassigned to the undersigned judge. The parties are instructed that all future filings in these

cases shall bear the initials JSC immediately after the case number. Although the cases have been 

related, each Plaintiff, Ms. Bell and Ms. Everette, is responsible for pursuing her own claims.

As both Ms. Bell and Ms. Everette are proceeding pro se, the Court strongly encourages

them each to visit the Legal Help Center for free legal assistance regarding their claims. The 

Legal Help Center has offices in San Francisco and Oakland: 

Case 3:16-cv-05935-MMC Document 12 Filed 10/27/16 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

San Francisco Legal Help Center

United States Courthouse

450 Golden Gate Avenue

15th Floor, Room 2796

San Francisco, CA 94102

Appointment line: 415-782-8982

Oakland Legal Help Center

United States Courthouse

1301 Clay Street

4th Floor, Room 470S

Oakland, CA 94612 

Appointment line: 415-782-8982

Defendant has filed a motion to dismiss in each case. Plaintiffs may discuss how to 

respond to the motion to dismiss with the Legal Help Center. The briefing schedule for both 

motions is reset as follows: each Plaintiff shall separately file an opposition or statement of nonopposition to the motion by November 23, 2016 and Defendant may file a reply by November 30, 

2016. The hearing on the motions is scheduled for December 15, 2016 at 2:00 p.m. in Courtroom 

F, 450 Golden Gate Ave., San Francisco, California. 

Finally, because this action has been randomly assigned to the undersigned magistrate 

judge, by statute Plaintiffs must affirmatively consent to the jurisdiction of a magistrate judge. 

The Clerk shall include the form for consenting or declining to consent to the jurisdiction of a 

magistrate judge with this Order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 27, 2016

JACQUELINE SCOTT CORLEY

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:16-cv-05935-MMC Document 12 Filed 10/27/16 Page 2 of 2