Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_07-cv-05512/USCOURTS-cand-4_07-cv-05512-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Juan Manuel Chavez
Petitioner
Ben Curry
Respondent

Document Text:

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

OAKLAND DIVISION

JUAN MANUEL CHAVEZ,

Petitioner,

 vs.

BEN CURRY, Warden,

Respondent. /

No. C 07-5512 PJH (PR)

ORDER FOR

SUPPLEMENTAL

BRIEFING

This is a habeas case directed to a denial of parole. On April 22, 2010, the United

States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued an en banc decision in Hayward v

Marshall, deciding important issues relating to federal review of parole decisions. Hayward

v Marshall, No. 06-55392, 2010 WL 1664977 (9th Cir. April 22, 2010).

It would assist the court to have briefing from the parties regarding the impact of the

Hayward en banc decision on this case. 

Respondent must send petitioner a copy of the Hayward en banc decision within ten

days of the date this order is entered. Within thirty days of the date this order is entered,

respondent must file and serve a supplemental brief on the impact of Hayward on this

action. If petitioner desires to respond to the supplemental brief, he shall do so by serving

and filing a supplemental brief within thirty days of the date respondent’s brief is served

upon him.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 11, 2010. 

 PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON

United States District Judge

P:\PRO-SE\PJH\HC.07\CHAVEZ5512.supp briefing.wpd

Case 4:07-cv-05512-PJH Document 11 Filed 05/11/10 Page 1 of 1