Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-16-06918/USCOURTS-ca4-16-06918-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
James Eddie Palmer
Appellant
United States of America
Appellee

Document Text:

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-6918

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

JAMES EDDIE PALMER,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Arenda L. Wright Allen, 

District Judge. (2:93-cr-00090-AWA-2)

Submitted: January 6, 2017 Decided: February 3, 2017

Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Harry Dennis Harmon, Jr., Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellant.

Andrew Curtis Bosse, Darryl James Mitchell, Randy Carl Stoker, 

Assistant United States Attorneys, V. Kathleen Dougherty, OFFICE 

OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 16-6918 Doc: 16 Filed: 02/03/2017 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

James Eddie Palmer appeals the district court’s order 

denying his motion nunc pro tunc to adjust his sentence pursuant 

to U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 5G1.3(b). We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, 

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United 

States v. Palmer, No. 2:93-cr-00090-AWA-2 (E.D. Va. June 28, 

2016). We deny the motion for appointment of counsel and 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Appeal: 16-6918 Doc: 16 Filed: 02/03/2017 Pg: 2 of 2