Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_16-cv-01351/USCOURTS-caed-2_16-cv-01351-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Michalla Alfaro Brittany
Plaintiff
Wells Fargo Bank NA
Defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MICHALLA ALFARO BRITTANY,

Plaintiff,

v.

WELLS FARGO BANK NA,

Defendant.

No. 2:16-cv-1351 TLN CKD PS

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

By order filed June 28, 2016, plaintiff was ordered to show cause why this action should 

not be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Plaintiff has not filed a response to the 

order to show cause. There being no evident basis for subject matter jurisdiction, the court will 

recommend that this action be dismissed.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed for lack of 

subject matter jurisdiction.

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 

after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written 

objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned 

“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Failure to file objections 

/////

Case 2:16-cv-01351-TLN-CKD Document 5 Filed 07/15/16 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. 

Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

Dated: July 15, 2016

4 alfarobrittany1351.nosmj.57

_____________________________________

CAROLYN K. DELANEY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:16-cv-01351-TLN-CKD Document 5 Filed 07/15/16 Page 2 of 2