Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-03376/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-03376-6/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Nationstar Mortgage LLC
Defendant
George Von Bozzay
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

11951.0644/6019381.1 CV-15-3376

SIXTH STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEFENDANT’S TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO

N.D. L.R. 6-1

MARY KATE SULLIVAN (State Bar No. 180203)

mks@severson.com

MEGAN C. KELLY (State Bar No. 251293)

mck@severson.com

SEVERSON & WERSON

A Professional Corporation

One Embarcadero Center, Suite 2600

San Francisco, California 94111

Telephone: (415) 398-3344

Facsimile: (415) 956-0439

Attorneys for Defendant Nationstar Mortgage

LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA — SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

GEORGE VON BOZZAY,

Plaintiff,

vs.

NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE, LLC, et al.,

Defendant.

Case No. CV-15-3376

SIXTH STIPULATION TO EXTEND

DEFENDANT’S TIME TO RESPOND TO

COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO N.D. L.R.

6-1

Plaintiff GEORGE VON BOZZAY (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant NATIONSTAR

MORTGAGE LLC (“Defendant”) hereby stipulate and agree as follows:

WHEREAS, Plaintiff filed the complaint initiating the above-referenced action on July 22,

2015;

WHEREAS, Plaintiff served the complaint on Defendant on July 24, 2015;

WHEREAS, based on the July 24, 2015 service date, Defendant’s deadline to respond to

the complaint was originally August 14, 2015;

WHEREAS, on or about August 14, 2015, the parties stipulated to extend Defendant’s

deadline to respond to the complaint to August 28, 2015;

WHEREAS, on August 14, 2015, the Court issued an Order referring the case to the ADR

Unit for an assessment telephone conference on September 11, 2015;

WHEREAS, August 25, 2015, the parties stipulated to extend Defendant’s deadline to

Case 3:15-cv-03376-JCS Document 34 Filed 12/18/15 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

11951.0644/6019381.1 2 CV-15-3376

SIXTH STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEFENDANT’S TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO

N.D. L.R. 6-1

respond to the complaint to September 28, 2015.

WHEREAS, on September 11, 2015, the parties attended the ADR teleconference and in

light of the parties existing efforts to determine whether there may be the potential for an informal

resolution, a further teleconference was scheduled for October 29, 2015.

WHEREAS, on or about September 15, 2015 the parties stipulated to extend Defendant’s

deadline to respond to the complaint to October 28, 2015;

WHEREAS, on October 29, 2015, the parties appeared for the further ADR teleconference,

however the ADR Program representative did not join.

WHEREAS, on or about October 21, 2015, the parties stipulated to extend Defendant’s

deadline to respond to the complaint to November 27, 2015;

WHEREAS, on November 6, 2015, the parties attended a case management conference at

which time the Court referred the parties to another ADR Program phone conference to occur

within sixty (60) days and set a further case management conference for February 12, 2016.

WHEREAS, on December 16, 2015, the parties attended a further ADR teleconference and

discussed the fact that the parties continue to work together to determine whether an informal

resolution will be possible. A further ADR teleconference was scheduled for January 27, 2016.

WHEREAS, no trial schedule has been set.

WHEREAS, as stated above, the parties continue to explore whether there may be the

potential for an informal resolution;

WHEREAS, in order to continue in these informal resolution discussions, reduce the costs

of litigation for all parties, and unburden the Court’s docket, counsel for the parties’ have met and

conferred and agreed to a further thirty (30) day extension of the deadline for Defendant to

respond to the complaint. This is the parties’ sixth such stipulation.

Based on the foregoing and pursuant to N.D. Local Rule 6-1, it is hereby STIPULATED:

Defendant shall have up to and including January 27, 2016 to respond to the complaint.

Case 3:15-cv-03376-JCS Document 34 Filed 12/18/15 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

11951.0644/6019381.1 3 CV-15-3376

SIXTH STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEFENDANT’S TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO

N.D. L.R. 6-1

DATED: December 16, 2015 MELLEN LAW FIRM

By: /s/ Sarah Shapero

Sarah Shapero

Attorneys for Plaintiff George Von Bozzay

I, Megan C. Kelly, am the ECF user whose identification and password are being used to file this

SIXTH STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEFENDANT’S TIME TO RESPOND TO

COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO N.D. L.R. 6-1. I hereby attest that counsel for Plaintiff, Sarah

Shapero, has concurred in this filing. /s/ Megan C. Kelly

DATED: December 16, 2015 SEVERSON & WERSON

A Professional Corporation

By: /s/ Megan C. Kelly

Megan C. Kelly

Attorneys for Defendant Nationstar Mortgage LLC

Dated: 12/18/15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Joseph C. Spero

Case 3:15-cv-03376-JCS Document 34 Filed 12/18/15 Page 3 of 3