Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_09-cv-00764/USCOURTS-caed-2_09-cv-00764-18/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Jane Doe
Plaintiff
University of the Pacific
Defendant

Document Text:

1 

STIPULATION RE: EXTENDING TIME FOR REDACTING EVIDENCE 

Case No.: 2:09-CV-00764-FCD-KJM 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

MILLER 

LAW 

GROUP A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION

SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA

Janine S. Simerly (SBN 102361) 

jss@millerlawgroup.com 

Jennifer Cotner (SBN (SBN 255785) 

jrc@millerlawgroup.com 

MILLER LAW GROUP 

A Professional Corporation 

111 Sutter Street, Suite 700 

San Francisco, CA 94104 

Tel.: (415) 464-4300 

Fax: (415) 464-4336 

Attorneys for Defendant 

UNIVERSITY OF THE PACIFIC 

Ivo Labar (SBN 203492) 

labar@kerrwagstaffe.com

KERR & WAGSTAFFE LLP

100 Spear Street, Suite 1800 

San Francisco, CA 94105-1528 

Tel.: (415) 371-8500 

Fax: (415) 371-0500 

John Christopher Clune, Pro Hac Vice 

john@victimjustice.com

VICTIM JUSTICE INITIATIVE, PC 

2363 Blake Street, Suite 203 

Denver, CO 80205 

Tel.: (303) 413-8300 

Fax: (303) 413-8301 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

JANE DOE 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

JANE DOE, 

 Plaintiff, 

v. 

UNIVERSITY OF THE PACIFIC, 

 Defendant. 

 

Case No.: 2:09-CV-00764-FCD-KJM 

STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING 

TIME FOR REDACTING EVIDENCE

Complaint filed: March 18, 2009 

Case 2:09-cv-00764-FCD-KJN Document 112 Filed 01/05/11 Page 1 of 4
2 

STIPULATION RE: EXTENDING TIME FOR REDACTING EVIDENCE 

Case No.: 2:09-CV-00764-FCD-KJM 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

MILLER 

LAW 

GROUP A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION

SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA

WHEREAS, the Court, at the hearing which took place on December 3, 2010, 

ordered the parties to submit to the Court in camera on or before January 6, 2011 redacted 

copies of all attachments filed in connection with the Motion for Summary Judgment and 

fees motion, including all evidence, and the transcript of the hearing on Defendant’s Motion 

for Summary Judgment; 

WHEREAS, the parties agree that they need a short extension of time to 

redact the voluminous evidence submitted in connection with the Motion for Summary 

Judgment; 

WHEREAS, good cause exists to extend the time for the parties; 

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and 

between the parties, through their respective undersigned attorneys of record, that the date 

to submit all attachments in connection with the Motion for Summary Judgment and fees 

motion and the transcript of the hearing on Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment be 

extended from January 6, 2011 to January 11, 2011. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

Dated: January 5, 2011 MILLER LAW GROUP 

A Professional Corporation 

By: /s/ 

 JANINE S. SIMERLY 

Attorneys for DEFENDANT 

UNIVERSITY OF THE PACIFIC 

Case 2:09-cv-00764-FCD-KJN Document 112 Filed 01/05/11 Page 2 of 4
3 

STIPULATION RE: EXTENDING TIME FOR REDACTING EVIDENCE 

Case No.: 2:09-CV-00764-FCD-KJM 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

MILLER 

LAW 

GROUP A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION

SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA

Dated: January 5, 2011 VICTIM JUSTICE 

By: /s/ 

 JOHN CLUNE 

Attorneys for PLAINTIFF 

JANE DOE 

Case 2:09-cv-00764-FCD-KJN Document 112 Filed 01/05/11 Page 3 of 4
4 

STIPULATION RE: EXTENDING TIME FOR REDACTING EVIDENCE 

Case No.: 2:09-CV-00764-FCD-KJM 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

MILLER 

LAW 

GROUP A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION

SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA

ORDER

Having reviewed the Stipulation executed by Plaintiff JANE DOE and 

Defendant UNIVERSITY OF THE PACIFIC, and good cause appearing, the Court hereby 

orders the following: 

Plaintiff and Defendant shall file redacted versions of all attachments filed in 

connection with the Motion for Summary Judgment and fees motion, including all evidence, 

and the transcript of the hearing on Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment, on or 

before January 11, 2011. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

 

Dated: January 5, 2011 ________________________________ 

 FRANK C. DAMRELL, JR. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 2:09-cv-00764-FCD-KJN Document 112 Filed 01/05/11 Page 4 of 4