Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-00269/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-00269-4/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
Plaintiff
Lucent Technologies, Inc.
Defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY

COMMISSION,

Plaintiff,

 v.

LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,

Defendant.

 /

No. C-05-0269 MMC

ORDER CONDITIONALLY CLOSING

CASE FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES

On January 19, 2005 the above-titled action was transferred to this District from the

Central District of California. Shortly thereafter, on February 11, 2005, the Court stayed the

action at the parties’ request, pending the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals’ decision in

Hulteen v. AT & T Corp., C-01-1122 MJJ. The Ninth Circuit, on August 17, 2007, filed its

decision in Hulteen. See Hulteen v. AT & T Corp., 498 F.3d 1001 (9th Cir. 2007). On

October 22, 2007, AT&T Corp. filed a petition for certiorari with the United States Supreme

Court. See AT & T Corp. v. Hulteen, 2007 WL 3129920 (2007).

Accordingly, the action having been stayed for a period of over three years, nearly

the entire pendency of the action in this District, and the appeal on which the outcome of

the action depends proceeding without indication of when such appeal may be resolved,

the action is hereby CLOSED for statistical purposes only.

Nothing contained in this order shall be considered a dismissal or disposition of the

Case 3:05-cv-00269-MMC Document 20 Filed 02/15/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

action, and should further proceedings become necessary herein, any party may initiate

them in the same manner as if this order had not been entered.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 15, 2008 

MAXINE M. CHESNEY

United States District Judge

Case 3:05-cv-00269-MMC Document 20 Filed 02/15/08 Page 2 of 2