Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-16-06856/USCOURTS-ca4-16-06856-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Manoj Kumar Jha
Appellant
United States of America
Appellee

Document Text:

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-6856

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

MANOJ KUMAR JHA,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

Maryland, at Baltimore. Ellen L. Hollander, District Judge. 

(1:12-cr-00595-ELH-1)

Submitted: November 17, 2016 Decided: November 22, 2016

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and MOTZ and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Manoj Kumar Jha, Appellant Pro Se. Martin Joseph Clarke, Assistant 

United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 16-6856 Doc: 19 Filed: 11/22/2016 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Manoj Kumar Jha appeals from the district court’s order 

denying his motion for a new trial and denying his motion for 

reconsideration of the order granting the Government an extension 

of time to file a response. We have reviewed the record and find 

no abuse of discretion by the district court and no reversible 

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the 

district court. United States v. Jha, No. 1:12-cr-00595-ELH-1 (D. 

Md. June 13, 2016). We deny Jha’s motion for sanctions and his 

motion to vacate this court’s decision in United States v. Jha, 

613 F. App’x 212 (4th Cir. 2015) (No. 14-4717). We dispense with 

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Appeal: 16-6856 Doc: 19 Filed: 11/22/2016 Pg: 2 of 2