Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-01405/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-01405-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Genuine Parts Company
Defendant
Sean Mar
Plaintiff
Napa Auto Parts
Defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 1

STIPULATION FOR LEAVE FOR PLAINITFF TO FILE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT 

AND ORDER THEREON (CASE NO.: 2:15-cv-01405-MCE-AC)

BRYAN SCHWARTZ LAW

Bryan J. Schwartz (SBN 209903)

Email: bryan@bryanschwartzlaw.com

Yi-Fan C. Everett (SBN 301815)

Email: yvonne@bryanschwartzlaw.com

1330 Broadway, Suite 1630

Oakland, CA 94612

Telephone: (510) 444-9300

Facsimile: (510) 444-9301

Attorneys for Individual and Representative 

Plaintiff and the Collective Class

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Sean Mar, individually, on behalf of others 

similarly situated, and on behalf of the general 

public,

 Plaintiff,

 vs.

Genuine Parts Company, NAPA AUTO PARTS, 

and DOES 1-10, inclusive 

 Defendants.

Case No.: 2:15-cv-01405-MCE-AC

Judge: Hon. Morrison C. England, Jr.

 

STIPULATION FOR LEAVE FOR 

PLAINTIFF TO FILE FIRST AMENDED 

COMPLAINT AND ORDER THEREON 

Complaint Filed: July 1, 2015

Subsequent to the filing of this lawsuit and for settlement purposes only, Plaintiff, 

on behalf of himself and all other similarly situated individuals, asserts an additional 

cause of action, civil penalties pursuant to Labor Code Private Attorneys General Act of 

2004 (PAGA) (Cal. Labor Code § 2698, et seq.), and an additional cause of action for 

waiting time penalties (Cal. Labor Code § 203). Moreover, for settlement purposes only, 

Plaintiff has agreed to eliminate his California class claims because of Defendant 

Case 2:15-cv-01405-MCE-AC Document 26 Filed 03/30/16 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 2

STIPULATION FOR LEAVE FOR PLAINITFF TO FILE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT 

AND ORDER THEREON (CASE NO.: 2:15-cv-01405-MCE-AC)

Genuine Parts Company d/b/a NAPA Auto Parts’ (hereinafter “Defendant”) challenge 

based upon the numerosity requirement of Rule 23. 

Therefore, Plaintiff, on behalf of himself and all other similarly situated individuals, 

and Defendant, by and through their attorneys of record, hereby stipulate and agree that 

the Court should grant Plaintiff leave to file the attached First Amended Complaint in this 

lawsuit (attached hereto as Exhibit 1) and the First Amended Complaint shall be deemed 

served and filed on the date this Stipulation and Order is filed. 

The parties further agree that the Defendant’s deadline to answer the Complaint 

be continued to a date 30 days after the date of the Court’s ruling on the parties’ 

anticipated soon-to-be-filed request for settlement approval. 

By this stipulation, Defendant does not admit liability or otherwise waive its right to 

challenge the content of the First Amended Complaint. Moreover, to the extent that the 

Court does not approve the settlement of this lawsuit, then this stipulated Amended 

Complaint will be withdrawn.

 

DATED: March 21, 2016 BRYAN SCHWARTZ LAW

By:_s/Bryan Schwartz_________ 

Bryan Schwartz 

 Yi-Fan C. Everett 

Attorneys for Plaintiff and the Putative Class

Dated: March 21, 2016 MARTENSON, HASBROUCK & SIMON LLP 

 By:_s/Lisa Szafranic________ 

 Patricia Elizabeth Simon Lisa M. Szafranic

Attorneys for Defendant

Case 2:15-cv-01405-MCE-AC Document 26 Filed 03/30/16 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 3

STIPULATION FOR LEAVE FOR PLAINITFF TO FILE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT 

AND ORDER THEREON (CASE NO.: 2:15-cv-01405-MCE-AC)

ORDER

For good cause shown and based upon the stipulation of the parties, the Court 

hereby orders that Plaintiff is granted leave to file a First Amended Complaint, and 

Defendant’s deadline to answer the First Amended Complaint does not become due until 

30 days after the date of the Court’s ruling on the parties’ anticipated request for 

settlement approval. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 29, 2016

Case 2:15-cv-01405-MCE-AC Document 26 Filed 03/30/16 Page 3 of 3