Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_09-cv-03043/USCOURTS-caed-2_09-cv-03043-2/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
City of Fairfield
Defendant
Douglas James Cyr
Plaintiff
Brian Gassen
Defendant
Perry
Defendant
Nathan Strickland
Defendant
Larry Todd
Defendant

Document Text:

RUEB, MOTTA 

& MANOUKIAN 

Metroplex Office Centre 

1401 Willow Pass Road, 

Suite 880 

Concord, CA 94520 

(925)602-3400 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

PLAINTIFF’S DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION 

GREGORY D. RUEB, ESQ. SBN 154589

RUEB, MOTTA & MANOUKIAN 

A Professional Law Corporation 

1401 Willow Pass Road, Suite 880 

Concord, CA 94520 

Telephone: (925) 602-3400 

Facsimile: (925) 602-0622 

Attorneys for Petitioner 

DOUGLAS JAMES CYR 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

DOUGLAS JAMES CYR, 

 

 Plaintiff, 

v. 

 

CITY OF FAIRFIELD, LARRY TODD, 

Police Chief of CITY OF FAIRFIELD, 

individually and in his capacity as Chief of 

Police for the CITY OF FAIRFIELD, 

FAIRFIELD POLICE OFFICERS BRIAN 

GASSEN, JOSEPH PERRY AND 

NATHAN STRICKLAND, and DOES 1 to 

100, inclusive, 

 Defendants. 

Case No. 2:09-CV-03043-LKK-KJM

PLAINTIFF’S DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE 

ACTION 

Plaintiff dismisses with prejudice this entire action of all parties and all causes of action. 

Each side to bear its own fees and costs. 

Dated: December 15, 2010 RUEB, MOTTA & MANOUKIAN 

By: /S/ GREGORY D. RUEB Attorney for Plaintiff 

 DOUGLAS JAMES CYR 

 IT IS SO ORDERED. 

 Dated: January 3, 2011. 

Case 2:09-cv-03043-LKK -KJM Document 29 Filed 01/04/11 Page 1 of 2
RUEB, MOTTA 

& MANOUKIAN 

Metroplex Office Centre 

1401 Willow Pass Road, 

Suite 880 

Concord, CA 94520 

(925)602-3400 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

-2-

PLAINTIFF’S DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION 

PROOF OF SERVICE

Cyr v. City of Fairfield, et al. 

U.S. District Court, Eastern District No. 09-CV-03043-LKK-KJM 

I am a citizen of the United States, over 18 years of age and not party to the within action. 

I am employed in the county of Contra Costa; my business address is 1401 Willow Pass Road, 

Suite 880, Concord, CA 94520. 

On the date shown below, I served the within documents: 

PLAINTIFF’S DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION 

on all parties in this action, as addressed below, by causing a true copy thereof to be distributed as 

follows:

Kimberly M. Drake, Esq. 

MEYERS, NAVE, RIBACK, SILVER & 

WILSON 

555 12TH Street, Suite 1500 

Oakland, CA 94607

Telephone: (510) 808-2000 

Facsimile: (510) 444-1108 

Attorney for Defendants 

City of Fairfield, et al. 

 BY MAIL: I am “readily familiar” with the firm’s practice of collection and processing 

correspondence for mailing. Under that practice it would be deposited with 

U.S. Postal service on that same day with postage thereon fully prepaid in the 

ordinary course of business. I am aware that on motion of the party served, 

service is presumed invalid if postal cancellation date or postage meter data is 

more than one day after date of deposit for mailing in affidavit. 

9 VIA HAND 

DELIVERY:

I caused such envelope, to be hand delivered to the stated parties. 

 VIA EXPRESS 

CARRIER: 

I caused such documents to be collected by an agent for ___________ to be 

delivered to the offices of the stated parties. 

VIA FACSIMILE by transmitting via FACSIMILE the document(s) listed above to the fax 

number(s) set forth below on this date before 5:00 p.m. 

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is 

true and correct. 

Executed on December 15, 2010, at Concord, California. 

RAUL LAGUITAN 

Case 2:09-cv-03043-LKK -KJM Document 29 Filed 01/04/11 Page 2 of 2