Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca8-16-02145/USCOURTS-ca8-16-02145-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Charles Swift
Appellant
Walmart
Appellee

Document Text:

United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 16-2145

___________________________

Charles Swift

lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant

v.

Walmart

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee

____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the District of Nebraska - Omaha

____________

 Submitted: October 3, 2016

Filed: October 6, 2016

[Unpublished]

____________

Before LOKEN, BOWMAN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges. 

____________

PER CURIAM.

Charles Swift appeals the district court’s preservice dismissal without 1

prejudice of his pro se diversity complaint. The court dismissed the complaint after

The Honorable Richard G. Kopf, United States District Judge for the District 1

of Nebraska.

Appellate Case: 16-2145 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/06/2016 Entry ID: 4456155 
Swift failed to comply with the court’s order to provide evidence of damages

sufficient to invoke diversity jurisdiction. Having carefully considered the record,

and given the without-prejudice nature ofthe dismissal, we conclude the district court

did not abuse its discretion in dismissing without prejudice. 

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________

-2-

Appellate Case: 16-2145 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/06/2016 Entry ID: 4456155