Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-00865/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-00865-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Vance Nilsen
Petitioner
Daniel Paramo
Respondent

Document Text:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

VANCE NILSEN,

Plaintiff,

v.

DANIEL PARAMO,

Defendant.

Case No. 16-cv-00865-VC 

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

Re: Dkt. No. 1

Having considered the habeas petition and the petitioner's response to the Court's earlier 

order to show cause regarding jurisdiction, the Court concludes that the petition is not "so 

incredible or frivolous as to warrant summary dismissal." Hendricks v. Vasquez, 908 F.2d 490, 

492 (9th Cir. 1990). The clerk is therefore ordered to serve a copy of the petition and all 

supporting materials on the respondent, and the respondent is ordered to file (and serve on the 

petitioner) an answer to the petition within 60 days of the date of this order. Respondent shall 

also file and serve a copy of all portions of the state-court record that are relevant in adjudicating 

the issues raised by the petition.

If the petitioner wishes to file a traverse, he may do so within 30 days of the respondent's 

answer.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 5, 2016

______________________________________

VINCE CHHABRIA

United States District Judge

Case 3:16-cv-00865-VC Document 9 Filed 04/05/16 Page 1 of 1