Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-03197/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-03197-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Sergio Velazquez Cano
Plaintiff
Chang H. Han
Defendant
Domingo Hernandez
Plaintiff
Sun Roofing & Construction Inc.
Defendant
Travis D. Wilson
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1 CASE NO. C06-03197 SI

PLAINTIFFS’ EX PARTE TO CONTINUE INITIAL CMC 

Wilson, et. al. vs. Sun Roofing & Construction Inc., et. al. 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

ADAM WANG (STATE BAR NUMBER 201233) 

DAL BON & WANG 

12 South First Street, Suite 613 

San Jose, Ca 95113 

Tel: (408) 421-3403 

Fax: (408) 351-0261 

Attorney for Plaintiffs 

Travis D. Wilson, Sergio Velazquez Cano, 

& Domingo Hernandez 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR DISTRICT OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA 

TRAVIS D. WILSON, SERGIO VELAZQUEZ 

CANO, & DOMINGO HERNANDEZ, 

Plaintiffs, 

 vs. 

SUN ROOFING & CONSTRUCTION INC.,

CHANG H. HAN, & DOES 1 - 10, 

 Defendants

Case No.: C06-03197 SI 

PLAINTIFFS’ EX PARTE TO CONTINUE

INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT 

CONFERENCE & [PROPOSED] ORDER 

Plaintiffs hereby move ex parte that the Initial Case Management Conference be 

continued to September 15, 2006 as follows: 

1. In or about March 2006, plaintiffs, Travis Wilson, Sergio Cano and 

Domingo Hernandez entered into a contingency fee agreement, employing my firm to 

represent them to pursue damages for unpaid overtime time under Fair Labor Standards 

Act and California Labor Code. Thereafter, Mr. Wilson and Mr. Cano had called me 

numerous times urging the prompt filing of their complaint. This case was filed on May 

12, 2006 against defendants Sun Roofing & Construction Inc. and Chang Ha. On June 

22, 2006, the Summons was served on both defendants Sun Roofing & Construction Inc. 

and Chang Han. 

2. Shortly after service of Summons, I received phones from a lady from 

defendant Sun Roofing & Construction Inc. concerning this case. 

Case 3:06-cv-03197-SI Document 5 Filed 08/09/2006 Page 1 of 3

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

DENIED

Judge Susan Illston

Case 3:06-cv-03197-SI Document 6 Filed 08/10/06 Page 1 of 3
 

 2 CASE NO. C06-03197 SI

PLAINTIFFS’ EX PARTE TO CONTINUE INITIAL CMC 

Wilson, et. al. vs. Sun Roofing & Construction Inc., et. al. 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

4. On or about July 1, 2006, I received three letters, allegedly signed by three 

plaintiffs, stating that they decided not to continue this case, requesting that the case be 

dismissed. Shortly thereafter, I received a phone call from plaintiff Travis Wilson, 

alleging that he made a mistake in alleging that he was owed overtime, and denying that 

he received any payment from defendants to settle this case. Recently, I received a 

notarized letter from Mr. Wilson, requesting to dismiss his case. A substantially same 

letter, allegedly signed by Mr. Cano, was also received, which did not notarize the 

identification of the person signing the letter. No notarized letter relating to Mr. 

Hernandez has been received. 

5. To discharge our duty as plaintiffs’ attorney to ascertain plaintiffs’ 

intension to abandon their lawsuits from the direct communications with plaintiffs, we 

have sent out letters to plaintiffs’ addresses maintained in our file. Should we still not 

receive responses from plaintiffs for certain period of time, we will assume that plaintiffs 

have reached collusive settlements with defendants to defraud my attorney’s fees and 

costs, and will accordingly bring a motion for permission to continue litigating the case to 

judgment for the purpose of collecting attorney’s fees pursuant to Bennett v. Sinclair Nav. 

Co., 33 F. Supp. 14 (E.D. Pa. 1940), Katopodis v. Liberian S/T Olympic Sun, 282 F. Supp. 369 

(E.D. Va. 1968), and The Golden Star, 82 F.2d 687 (9th Cir. 1936). 

6. As such, plaintiffs request that the Initial Case Management Conference 

scheduled on August 11, 2006 be continued for 45 days to September 15, 2006. 

7. I declare under the penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and accurate. 

Dated: August 9, 2006 ADAM WANG 

By: /s/ Adam Wang 

 Attorney for Plaintiffs 

Case 3:06-cv-03197-SI Document 5 Filed 08/09/2006 Page 2 of 3
 Case 3:06-cv-03197-SI Document 6 Filed 08/10/06 Page 2 of 3
 

 3 CASE NO. C06-03197 SI

PLAINTIFFS’ EX PARTE TO CONTINUE INITIAL CMC 

Wilson, et. al. vs. Sun Roofing & Construction Inc., et. al. 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

 GOOD CAUSE SHOWING, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Initial Case 

Management Conference be continued to September 15, 2006. 

 IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: August ____, 2006 By _________________________ 

 Susan Illston 

 United States District Judge 

Case 3:06-cv-03197-SI Document 5 Filed 08/09/2006 Page 3 of 3
 Case 3:06-cv-03197-SI Document 6 Filed 08/10/06 Page 3 of 3