Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-10-06092/USCOURTS-ca4-10-06092-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Roderick Black
Appellant
United States of America
Appellee

Document Text:

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-6092

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

RODERICK BLACK,

Defendant – Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, 

District Judge. (2:94-cr-00015-BO-9)

Submitted: March 16, 2010 Decided: March 24, 2010

Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Roderick Black, Appellant Pro Se. Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., 

Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for 

Appellee. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 10-6092 Doc: 10 Filed: 03/24/2010 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Roderick Black appeals the district court’s order 

denying Black’s motion for sentence reduction pursuant to 

18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and 

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the 

reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Black, 

No. 2:94-cr-00015-BO-9 (E.D.N.C. filed Dec. 17, 2009; entered 

Dec. 18, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the 

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before the court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Appeal: 10-6092 Doc: 10 Filed: 03/24/2010 Pg: 2 of 2