Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-06434/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-06434-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Elantech Devices Corporation
Counter-claimant
Synaptics Incorporated
Counter-defendant

Document Text:

STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO ANSWER CASE NO. CV 07 6434 CRB - 1 -

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Yitai Hu (SBN 248085) (yhu@akingump.com) 

Sean P. DeBruine (SBN 168071) (sdebruine@akingump.com) 

Hsin-Yi Cindy Feng (SBN 215152) (cfeng@akingump.com) 

AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER & FELD LLP 

Two Palo Alto Square 

3000 El Camino Real, Suite 400 

Palo Alto, California 94306-2112 

Telephone: 650-838-2000 

Facsimile: 650-838-2001 

Attorneys for Defendant 

ELANTECH DEVICES CORPORATION 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

SYNAPTICS INCORPORATED, 

a Delaware corporation; 

 Plaintiff, 

 vs. 

ELANTECH DEVICES CORP., a 

corporation existing under the laws of 

Taiwan, R.O.C., 

 Defendants. 

Case No. CV 07-6434 CRB 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO 

ANSWER COMPLAINT 

Plaintiff Synaptics Incorporated (“Synaptics”) and defendant Elantech Devices Corp. 

(“Elantech”), by their undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate that the time for Elantech to answer or 

otherwise respond to the Complaint in this matter shall be enlarged to sixty days from February 7, 2008. 

As such, the parties agree that Elantech shall answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint on or before 

April 7, 2008 and respectfully request that the Court so order. 

Dated: February 25, 2008 Respectfully submitted, 

AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER & FELD LLP 

By: /s/ 

Sean P. DeBruine 

Attorneys for Defendant 

ELANTECH DEVICES CORP. 

Case 3:07-cv-06434-CRB Document 8 Filed 03/03/08 Page 1 of 2
STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO ANSWER CASE NO. CV 07 6434 CRB - 2 -

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Dated: February 25, 2008 Respectfully submitted, 

MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP 

By: /s/ 

Erika L. Yawger 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

SYNAPTICS INCORPORATED 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATE:______________ _________________________________________ 

 HONORABLE CHARLES R. BREYER 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

March 3, 2008

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Charles R. Breyer

Case 3:07-cv-06434-CRB Document 8 Filed 03/03/08 Page 2 of 2