Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_19-cv-00963/USCOURTS-caed-2_19-cv-00963-2/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Hakim R. Hasan
Petitioner
State of California
Respondent

Document Text:

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

HAKIM R. HASAN, 

Petitioner, 

v. 

STATE OF CALIFORNIA, 

Respondent. 

No. 2:19-cv-0963 KJM DB P 

ORDER 

 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas 

corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as 

provided by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 

 On December 5, 2019, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which 

were served on petitioner and which contained notice to petitioner that any objections to the 

findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 6.) Petitioner has 

filed objections to the findings and recommendations. (ECF No. 7.) 

 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this 

court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having reviewed the file, the court finds the 

findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the proper analysis in that 

petitioner has not exhausted remedies as required to pursue a habeas petition. This does not mean 

Case 2:19-cv-00963-KJM-DB Document 8 Filed 01/17/20 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2 

petitioner is without some form of remedy if his allegations are proven true; but again habeas is 

not the vehicle for any such remedy. 

 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 

 1. The findings and recommendations filed December 5, 2019, are adopted in full; 

 2. This action is dismissed without prejudice for failure to exhaust state remedies; and 

 3. The court declines to issue the certificate of appealability referenced in 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2253. 

DATED: January 16, 2020. 

Case 2:19-cv-00963-KJM-DB Document 8 Filed 01/17/20 Page 2 of 2