Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-09-07878/USCOURTS-ca4-09-07878-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Steven Allen Byrd
Appellant
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Appellee
Anita Jones
Appellee
Mildred Rivera
Appellee
Zoltan R. Vendel
Appellee

Document Text:

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-7878

STEVEN ALLEN BYRD,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS; MILDRED RIVERA, Warden; ZOLTAN R. 

VENDEL, Dr., Clinical Director; ANITA JONES, Camp 

Administrator,

Defendants – Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Charleston. Terry L. Wooten, District Judge. 

(2:08-cv-03540-TLW)

Submitted: May 17, 2010 Decided: June 3, 2010

Before KING and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Steven Allen Byrd, Appellant Pro Se. Beth Drake, Assistant 

United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 09-7878 Doc: 12 Filed: 06/03/2010 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Steven Byrd appeals the district court’s order 

accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation to grant 

Defendants summary judgment on Byrd’s claims, which the 

magistrate judge construed as being filed pursuant to Bivens v. 

Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 

388 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible 

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the 

district court. Byrd v. Fed. Bureau of Prisons, No. 2:08-cv03540-TLW (D.S.C. Sept. 25, 2009). We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before the court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Appeal: 09-7878 Doc: 12 Filed: 06/03/2010 Pg: 2 of 2