Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_06-cv-06293/USCOURTS-cand-4_06-cv-06293-9/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Dell Inc.
Defendant
Melissa Malloy
Plaintiff
Michael Omstead
Plaintiff
Lisa Smith
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION & [PROP] ORDER REGARDING THE

SCHEDULE FOR THE FILING OF THE SAC AND 

RESPONSIVE PLEADING - Case No. 06-06293 PJH

REEVES & BRIGHTWELL LLP

221 W. 6

TH ST STE 1000

AUSTIN TX 78701-3418

(5(

Douglas R. Young (State Bar No. 073248)

C. Brandon Wisoff (State Bar No. 121930)

Farella Braun & Martel LLP

235 Montgomery Street, 17th Floor

San Francisco, CA 94104

Telephone: (415) 954-4400

Facsimile: (415) 954-4480

Kim E. Brightwell, Esq. (Texas SBN 02992700)

Pro Hac Vice

Paul Schlaud, Esq. (Texas SBN 24013469)

Pro Hac Vice

Sinead O’Carroll, Esq. (Texas SBN 24013253)

Pro Hac Vice

Reeves & Brightwell, LLP

221 W. Sixth Street, Suite 1000

Austin, TX 78701-3410

Telephone: (512) 334-4500

Facsimile: (512) 334-4492

Attorneys for Defendant

DELL INC.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

MICHAEL OMSTEAD, MELISSA 

MALLOY and LISA SMITH, individually 

and on behalf of all others similarly 

situated,

Plaintiffs,

vs.

DELL INC.,

Defendant.

Case No. C06-06293 PJH

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER REGARDING THE SCHEDULE 

FOR THE FILING OF THE SECOND 

AMENDED COMPLAINT AND 

RESPONSIVE PLEADING

The Honorable Phyllis J. Hamilton 

Case 4:06-cv-06293-PJH Document 91 Filed 05/07/10 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION & [PROP] ORDER REGARDING THE

SCHEDULE FOR THE FILING OF THE SAC AND 

RESPONSIVE PLEADING - Case No. 06-06293 PJH

- 1 -

REEVES & BRIGHTWELL LLP

221 W. 6

TH ST STE 1000

AUSTIN TX 78701-3418

Pursuant to Local Rules 6-1, 6-2, and 7-12, Defendant Dell Inc. (“Dell”) and Plaintiffs

Michael Omstead, Melissa Malloy, and Lisa Smith (“Plaintiffs”), by and through their respective 

counsel, hereby stipulate as follows:

Plaintiffs appealed the Court’s order dismissing this matter for failure to prosecute. The 

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals reversed that order and remanded this matter, and the mandate 

making the Court of Appeals’ judgment effective issued on February 15, 2010 (Dkt. 87).

Following that date, Plaintiffs informed Dell of their intent to file a second amended 

complaint. To facilitate the filing of that amended complaint and Defendant’s responsive 

pleading, the parties agree that Dell need not respond to current complaint and that:

 Plaintiffs will provide Dell with a copy of their second amended complaint no later than 

June 4, 2010. 

 Plaintiffs will file their second amended complaint with Dell’s written consent or with a 

motion for leave to file that complaint, if necessary, no later than June 11, 2010.

 Dell’s responsive pleading will be due 30 days after the filing of the second amended 

complaint with Dell’s written consent or upon a ruling on Plaintiffs’ motion for leave to 

file a second amended complaint, whichever is later.

 If Dell files a motion to dismiss as its responsive pleading, the parties will meet and confer 

regarding a briefing schedule and hearing date for that motion and that briefing schedule 

will allow Plaintiffs at least 30 days to file their opposition.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

I, Sinead O’Carroll, attest that concurrence in the filing of the above stipulation and 

[proposed] order has been obtained for counsel for Plaintiffs.

Case 4:06-cv-06293-PJH Document 91 Filed 05/07/10 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION & [PROP] ORDER REGARDING THE

SCHEDULE FOR THE FILING OF THE SAC AND 

RESPONSIVE PLEADING - Case No. 06-06293 PJH

- 2 -

REEVES & BRIGHTWELL LLP

221 W. 6

TH ST STE 1000

AUSTIN TX 78701-3418

DATED: April 22, 2010 REEVES & BRIGHTWELL LLP

By: /s/Sinead O’Carroll

 Sinead O’Carroll

ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT DELL INC.

DATED: April 22, 2010 LIEFF CABRASER HEIMANN & BERSTEIN LLP

By: /s/Kristen Law

 Kristen Law

ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFFS MICHAEL 

OMSTEAD, ET AL.

ORDER

For good cause shown, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: _______________________ _____________________________________

PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON

United States District Judge

5/7/10

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton

Case 4:06-cv-06293-PJH Document 91 Filed 05/07/10 Page 3 of 3