Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-02194/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-02194-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
MKD Construction, Inc.
Defendant
Swauger Ranch, Inc.
Plaintiff
Walker River Irrigation District
Defendant

Document Text:

LITTLER MENDELSON ATTORNEYS A T L A W

50 West Liberty Street 

Suite 400 

Reno, NV 89501.1944 

775.348.4888 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 1. 

STIPULATION AND ORDER 

TIMOTHY W. PEMBERTON, ESQ., CAL BAR NO. 102269 

P.O. Box 485 

Markleeville, CA 96120 

Telephone: 530.694.2490 

Fax No.: 530.694.2325 

Attorney for Plaintiff 

SWAUGER RANCH, INC. 

SUELLEN FULSTONE, NV BAR NO. 1615 

AARON CREWS, ESQ., CAL BAR NO. 235381 

LITTLER MENDELSON 

50 West Liberty Street, Suite 400 

Reno, NV 89501 

Telephone: 775.348.4888 

Fax No.: 775.562.8062 

Attorneys for Defendant 

WALKER RIVER IRRIGATION DISTRICT 

JOHN D. MOORE, ESQ., CAL BAR NO. 239407 

LAW OFFICES OF MICHAEL B. SPRINGER 

9628 Prototype Court 

Reno, NV 89521 

Telephone: 775.786.7445 

Fax No.: 775.786.7947 

Attorneys for Defendant 

MKD CONSTRUCTION, INC. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SWAUGER RANCH, INC., a California 

corporation, 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

WALKER RIVER IRRIGATION 

DISTRICT, a Nevada irrigation district; 

MKD CONSTRUCTION, INC., a Nevada 

corporation, 

Defendants. 

Case No. 2:07–CV–02194–FCD–EFB 

STIPULATION AND ORDER 

 Plaintiff, Swauger Ranch, Inc., and defendants, Walker River Irrigation District and MKD 

Construction, Inc., by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby advise the Court that 

Case 2:07-cv-02194-FCD-EFB Document 31 Filed 11/27/07 Page 1 of 3
LITTLER MENDELSON ATTORNEYS A T L A W

50 West Liberty Street 

Suite 400 

Reno, NV 89501.1944 

775.348.4888 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 2. 

STIPULATION AND ORDER 

they have agreed to include a mutual release of claims as between SRI and WRID and between SRI 

and MKD in their settlement agreement, and, on that basis, will enter into a stipulation for dismissal 

without prejudice of the plaintiff’s claims. The parties request that the hearing on the pending 

motions presently scheduled for November 30, 2007, be vacated and the parties allowed an 

additional period of time to and including December 7, 2007, to submit the dismissal stipulation. 

The additional time is requested to give the parties’ engineers sufficient time to determine the exact 

acreage of the parcel being transferred so that the written settlement agreement can be executed. 

Upon execution of that agreement, the stipulation for dismissal will be filed in the form previously 

submitted by plaintiff’s counsel. 

Dated: November 27, 2007. 

 By: /s/ Timothy W. Pemberton /s/ 

 TIMOTHY W. PEMBERTON, ESQ. 

 Attorney for Plaintiff 

 SWAUGER RANCH, INC. 

Dated: November 27, 2007. LITTLER MENDELSON 

 By: /s/ Suellen Fulstone /s/ 

 SUELLEN FULSTONE 

 Attorneys for Defendant 

 WALKER RIVER IRRIGATION DISTRICT 

Dated: November 27, 2007. LAW OFFICES OF MICHAEL B. SPRINGER 

 By: /s/ John D. Moore /s/ 

 JOHN D. MOORE, ESQ. 

 Attorneys for Defendant 

 MKD CONSTRUCTION, INC. 

///// 

///// 

///// 

///// 

Case 2:07-cv-02194-FCD-EFB Document 31 Filed 11/27/07 Page 2 of 3
LITTLER MENDELSON ATTORNEYS A T L A W

50 West Liberty Street 

Suite 400 

Reno, NV 89501.1944 

775.348.4888 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 3. 

STIPULATION AND ORDER 

ORDER

Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties above the Court hereby VACATES the motion 

hearing set for November 30, 2007 and sets a Status Conference for December 14, 2007 at 

10:00 a.m. The parties shall have an additional period of time to and including December 7, 2007 to 

submit the dismissal stipulation. The status conference shall be vacated upon receipt of the 

dismissal. 

 IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: November 27, 2007 

Case 2:07-cv-02194-FCD-EFB Document 31 Filed 11/27/07 Page 3 of 3