Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca10-89-02150/USCOURTS-ca10-89-02150-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Harry Milton Houps
Appellant
United States of America
Appellee

Document Text:

' FILED 

Uoited States Court of Appeals 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Tenth CiroJit 

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) 

) 

Plaintiff-Appellee, ) 

) 

v. ) 

) 

HARRY MILTON HOOPS, ) 

) 

Defendant-Appellant. ) 

ORDER AND JUDGMENT* 

JUL 1 6 1990 

&OBERT L. HOECKER 

Clerk 

No. 89-2150 

(D.C. No. CR86-320-l) 

(D. N.M.) 

Before ANDERSON, BARRETT, and BALDOCK, Circuit Judges. 

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel 

has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially 

assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 

34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The case is therefore ordered 

submitted without oral argument. 

Harry Milton Houps appeals from an order of the district 

court denying his motion to vacate his special parole term. We 

* This order and judgment has no precedential value and shall 

not be cited, or used by any court within the Tenth Circuit, 

except for purposes of establishing the doctrines of the law of 

the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. 10th Cir. R. 

36.3. 

Appellate Case: 89-2150 Document: 010110038384 Date Filed: 07/16/1990 Page: 1 
have reviewed the record on appeal and the parties' appellate 

briefs, and we agree with the district court that the crime which 

Houps pled guilty to was punishable by a special parole term. 

Accordingly, the judgment of the United States District Court 

for the District of New Mexico is AFFIRMED. 

ENTERED FOR THE COURT 

PER CURIAM 

2 

Appellate Case: 89-2150 Document: 010110038384 Date Filed: 07/16/1990 Page: 2