Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_16-cv-01111/USCOURTS-caed-2_16-cv-01111-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
NBS Default Services, LLC
Defendant
Rachel Pacray
Plaintiff
TBM Funding LLC
Defendant
Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Inc.
Defendant

Document Text:

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

RACHEL PACRAY, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

WELLS FARGO HOME MORTGAGE, 

INC.; NBS DEFAULT SERVICES, LLC; 

TBM FUNDING LLC; and DOES 1 

THROUGH 20, inclusive, 

Defendants. 

No. 2:16-cv-01111-KJM-EFB 

ORDER 

On May 23, 2016, this court issued a standing order. ECF No. 2-1. In the order, 

the parties were directed to engage in a meet and confer prior to filing a motion. Id. at 3. The 

meet and confer directive was designed to have the parties discuss thoroughly the substance of the 

contemplated motion and any potential resolution. Id. After meeting and conferring, if a party 

still desired to file a motion, that party was directed to file a notice of motion containing “a 

certification by counsel filing the motion that meet and confer efforts have been exhausted, with a 

brief summary of meet and confer efforts.” Id. 

On May 31, 2016, defendant Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Inc. filed a motion to 

dismiss under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1), 12(b)(6), and 9(b). ECF No. 4. Wells 

Case 2:16-cv-01111-KJM-EFB Document 12 Filed 07/13/16 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2

Fargo Home Mortgage, Inc.’s counsel did not file a certification indicating that meet and confer 

efforts have been exhausted. Thus, counsel did not comply with the 2016 standing order. 

Accordingly, counsel for defendant Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Inc. is hereby 

ORDERED, within seven (7) days of entry of this order, to show cause why it should not be 

sanctioned in the amount of $250 for its failure to comply with this court’s order. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: July 12, 2016 

Case 2:16-cv-01111-KJM-EFB Document 12 Filed 07/13/16 Page 2 of 2