Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_05-cv-01101/USCOURTS-cand-4_05-cv-01101-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
Plaintiff
Signature Flight Support Corporation
Defendant

Document Text:

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL 

CASE NO. C 05 1101 CW 

WILLIAM R. TAMAYO, Bar No. 084965 

JONATHAN T. PECK, Bar No. 12303 (VA) 

EVANGELINA HERNANDEZ, Bar No. 168879 

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY 

COMMISSION 

San Francisco District Office 

350 The Embarcadero, Suite 500 

San Francisco, CA 94105 

Telephone: (415) 625-5647 

Facsimile: (415) 625-5657 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY 

COMMISSION 

ALAN B. CARLSON, Bar No. 055090 

LITTLER MENDELSON 

A Professional Corporation 

50 West San Fernando Street, 14th Floor 

San Jose, CA 95113-2303 

Telephone: (408) 998-4150 

Facsimile: (408) 288-5686 

Attorneys for Defendant 

SIGNATURE FLIGHT SUPPORT 

CORPORATION 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT 

OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

SIGNATURE FLIGHT SUPPORT 

CORPORATION, 

Defendant. 

Case No. C 05 1101 CW 

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION FOR 

DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AND FOR 

RETENTION OF JURISDICTION BY THE 

Plaintiff Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) and Defendant 

Signature Flight Support Corporation (Signature), and through their undersigned counsel, hereby 

stipulate to dismissal with prejudice all claims against Defendant. There are no remaining issues or 

parties in this action. 

Pursuant to Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of America, 511 U.S. 375, 381-82 

Case 4:05-cv-01101-CW Document 14 Filed 02/23/06 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL 

CASE NO. C 05 1101 CW 2. 

(1994) and Flanagan v. Arnaiz, 143 F.3d 540, 543-44 (9th Cir. 1998), the parties further stipulate that 

this Court shall retain jurisdiction of this action, and they will not contest jurisdiction of this Court, 

for the purpose of resolving any disputes that may arise in the future regarding the parties’ 

Settlement Agreement, which Agreement shall be filed with the Court in conjunction with any 

enforcement action brought by any party hereto. The parties further agree that the Court’s 

jurisdiction over this matter shall automatically expire twelve (12) months from the date of the last 

signature on the Settlement Agreement. This stipulation is based on Rule 41(a)(1)(ii) of the Federal 

Rules of Civil Procedure and has been signed by all parties. The EEOC and the Agency agree to 

bear their own attorney’s fees and costs. 

Dated: February 21, 2006 

Dated: February 21, 2006 

ON BEHALF OF PLAINTIFF: 

/s/ William R. Tamayo 

WILLIAM R. TAMAYO 

Regional Attorney 

/s/ Jonathan T. Peck _

JONATHAN T. PECK 

Supervisory Trial Attorney 

Dated: February 21, 2006 /s/ Jonathan T. Peck for 

EVANGELINA HERNANDEZ 

Senior Trial Attorney 

Dated: February 21, 2006 

ON BEHALF OF DEFENDANT: 

/s/ Alan B. Carlson 

ALAN B. CARLSON 

LITTLER MENDELSON 

A Professional Corporation 

APPROVED AND SO ORDERED: 

 2/23/06 

Dated: /s/ CLAUDIA WILKEN 

CLAUDIA WILKEN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

Case 4:05-cv-01101-CW Document 14 Filed 02/23/06 Page 2 of 2