Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-01874/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-01874-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Michael David LLC
Counter Defendant
Oak Ridge Winery LLC
Counter Claimant

Document Text:

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING EX 

PARTE APPLICATION TO CONTINUE 

HEARING 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

VEDDER PRICE (CA), LLP

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN FRANCISCO

VEDDER PRICE (CA), LLP

Robert S. Beiser, Bar No. 0158682, Admitted Pro Hac 

Vice

rbeiser@vedderprice.com

Alain Villeneuve, Bar No. 06279975, Admitted Pro 

Hac Vice

avilleneuve@vedderprice.com

Lucky Meinz, Bar No. 261409

lmeinz@vedderprice.com

275 Battery Street, Suite 2464

San Francisco, California 94111

T: +1 (415) 749 9500

F: +1 (415) 749 9502

Attorneys for Plaintiff

Michael David LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SACRAMENTO DIVISION

MICHAEL DAVID LLC, a California limited 

liability company,

Plaintiff,

v.

OAK RIDGE WINERY LLC, a California 

limited liability company,

Defendant.

Case No. 2:15-cv-01874-WBS-AC

ORDER GRANTING EX PARTE

APPLICATION TO CONTINUE 

HEARING ON PENDING MOTIONS

OAK RIDGE WINERY LLC, a California 

limited liability company,

Counter-Claimant,

v.

MICHAEL DAVID LLC, a California limited 

liability company,

Counter-Defendant.

Case 2:15-cv-01874-WBS-AC Document 25 Filed 03/04/16 Page 1 of 2
- 2 -

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING EX 

PARTE APPLICATION TO CONTINUE 

HEARING 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

VEDDER PRICE (CA), LLP

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN FRANCISCO

After full consideration of all the memoranda, supporting declarations, and materials 

submitted and presented to this Court, and good cause appearing therefore, Plaintiff David 

Michael LLC’s Ex Parte Application to Continue Hearing on Defendant’s Motion for Judgment 

on the Pleadings with Respect to its Sixth Counterclaim and Partial Judgment on the Pleadings 

with Respect to its Second Counterclaim (“Defendant’s Motion”), and Plaintiff’s Cross-Motion 

for Judgment on the Pleadings As Counts I, II, and VI of the Counterclaims and Defendant’s 

Affirmative Defenses III, V, and VI (“Plaintiff’s Cross-Motion”) is hereby GRANTED. 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the hearing on Defendant’s Motion and Plaintiff’s CrossMotion shall be continued from March 7, 2016 to March 21, 2016 at 1:30 p.m. Plaintiff’s reply 

in support of its Cross-Motion shall be due by March 14, 2016.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: March 4, 2016

Case 2:15-cv-01874-WBS-AC Document 25 Filed 03/04/16 Page 2 of 2