Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-02578/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-02578-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Edward Bridgeman
Petitioner
CDC California Medical Facility
Respondent

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

EDWARD BRIDGEMAN,

Petitioner,

v.

CDC CALIFORNIA MEDICAL 

FACILITY,

Respondent.

No. 2:15-cv-2578 TLN CKD P

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

By order filed January 5, 2016, the petition in this action was summarily dismissed, and 

petitioner was granted thirty days to file an amended petition. Petitioner was advised that failure 

to timely amend would result in a recommendation of dismissal. The thirty day period has now 

expired, and petitioner has not responded to the court’s order.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without 

prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 

after being served with these findings and recommendations, petitioner may file written 

objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s 

Findings and Recommendations.” Petitioner is advised that failure to file objections within the

Case 2:15-cv-02578-TLN-CKD Document 9 Filed 02/17/16 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 

F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

Dated: February 17, 2016

2/brid2578.fta.hab

_____________________________________

CAROLYN K. DELANEY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:15-cv-02578-TLN-CKD Document 9 Filed 02/17/16 Page 2 of 2