Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-03755/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-03755-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Warren L. Montgomery
Respondent
Miguel Wooten
Petitioner

Document Text:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MIGUEL WOOTEN,

Plaintiff,

v.

WARREN L. MONTGOMERY,

Defendant.

Case No. 16-cv-03755-VC 

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

Wooten's habeas petition is not "so incredible or frivolous as to warrant summary 

dismissal." Hendricks v. Vasquez, 908 F.2d 490, 492 (9th Cir. 1990). The clerk is therefore 

ordered to serve a copy of the petition and all supporting materials on the respondent, and the 

respondent is ordered to file (and serve on the petitioner) an answer to the petition within 60 days 

of the date of this order. Respondent shall also file and serve a copy of all portions of the statecourt record that are relevant in adjudicating the issues raised by the petition. 

If the petitioner wishes to file a traverse, he may do so within 30 days of the respondent's 

answer.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 15, 2016

______________________________________

VINCE CHHABRIA

United States District Judge

Case 3:16-cv-03755-VC Document 6 Filed 07/15/16 Page 1 of 1