Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-16-01260/USCOURTS-ca4-16-01260-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission

Montgomery County Board of Education
Appellee
Adrian D. Pugh
Appellant

Document Text:

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-1260

ADRIAN D. PUGH,

 Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

MONTGOMERY COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION,

 Defendant – Appellee,

and

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION,

 Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, Senior District 

Judge. (8:13-cv-02862-DKC)

Submitted: July 21, 2016 Decided: July 25, 2016

Before SHEDD, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Adrian D. Pugh, Appellant Pro Se. Edward B. Lattner, COUNTY 

ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, Rockville, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 16-1260 Doc: 20 Filed: 07/25/2016 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Adrian D. Pugh appeals the district court’s judgment 

granting the Montgomery County Board of Education’s summary 

judgment motion on her race discrimination claims, brought 

pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as 

amended, 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (West 2012 & Supp. 

2015). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible 

error. Accordingly, although we grant Pugh’s application to 

proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by 

the district court. See Pugh v. Montgomery Cty. Bd. of Educ., 

No. 8:13-cv-02862-DKC (D. Md. Feb. 12, 2016). We dispense with 

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Appeal: 16-1260 Doc: 20 Filed: 07/25/2016 Pg: 2 of 2