Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-09-02079/USCOURTS-ca4-09-02079-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Keith Coddington

Robert M. Gates
Appellee
John Hild

Jerome Townsend

Kirk E. Webster
Appellant

Document Text:

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-2079

KIRK E. WEBSTER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

ROBERT M. GATES, Secretary, United States Department of 

Defense, National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency,

Defendant – Appellee,

and

JOHN HILD; JEROME TOWNSEND; KEITH CODDINGTON,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

Maryland, at Greenbelt. Roger W. Titus, District Judge. 

(8:07-cv-01107-RWT)

Submitted: April 19, 2010 Decided: May 5, 2010

Before KING, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kirk E. Webster, Appellant Pro Se. Rod J. Rosenstein, United 

States Attorney, Ariana Wright Arnold, Assistant United States 

Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Appeal: 09-2079 Doc: 14 Filed: 05/05/2010 Pg: 1 of 3
2

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 09-2079 Doc: 14 Filed: 05/05/2010 Pg: 2 of 3
3

PER CURIAM:

Kirk E. Webster appeals the district court’s order 

granting summary judgment to Defendant in this action claiming 

violations of 42 U.S.C. §§ 1981, 1983 (2006) and Title VII of 

the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended. We have reviewed the 

record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for 

the reasons stated by the district court. Webster v. Gates, No. 

8:07-cv-01107-RWT (D. Md. July 22, 2009). We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before the court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Appeal: 09-2079 Doc: 14 Filed: 05/05/2010 Pg: 3 of 3