Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-02843/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-02843-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Daniel Anderson
Plaintiff
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-1-

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

BRIAN R. DAVIS (SBN 160817) 

VIVIAN N. VO (SBN 231223) 

HAYES, DAVIS, BONINO, ELLINGSON, McLAY & SCOTT 

203 Redwood Shores Parkway, Suite 480 

Redwood Shores, California 94065 

Telephone: 650.637.9100 

Facsimile: 650.637.8071 

Attorney for Defendant 

STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY 

Erroneously sued herein as “STATE FARM INSURANCE COMPANIES” 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

DANIEL ANDERSON; 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

STATE FARM MUTUAL INSURANCE 

COMPANIES; and DOES I through X, inclusive; 

Defendants. 

CASE NO. 2:06-CV-02843-DEL-KJM 

STIPULATION AND ORDER DENYING

IN PART, AND GRANTING IN PART, 

MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE 

TO STATE A CLAIM UPON WHICH 

RELIEF CAN BE GRANTED 

[Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 

12(b)(6)] 

DATE: February 14, 2007 

TIME: 10:00 a.m. 

CTRM.: 7 

JUDGE: Honorable David F. Levi

Case 2:06-cv-02843-JAM -KJM Document 12 Filed 03/12/07 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-2-

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

I. 

STIPULATION

Defendant STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY’s 

(“STATE FARM”) motion to dismiss plaintiff DANIEL ANDERSON’s (“ANDERSON”) second 

cause of action for breach of insurance contract and third cause of action for negligence pursuant to 

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 12(b)(6), on file herein, has been submitted to the Honorable 

David F. Levi. 

STATE FARM through its counsel Brian R. Davis of Hayes Davis Bonino Ellingson McLay 

& Scott, and ANDERSON through his counsel Mark R. Swartz of the Law Offices of Mark R. 

Swartz, hereby Stipulate to the following Order. 

Dated: February ___, 2007 HAYES, DAVIS, BONINO, ELLINGSON, McLAY 

 & SCOTT 

By 

BRIAN R. DAVIS 

Attorney for Defendant 

STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE 

INSURANCE COMPANY 

Dated: February___, 2007 LAW OFFICES OF MARK R. SWARTZ 

By 

MARK R. SWARTZ 

Attorney for Plaintiff 

DANIEL ANDERSON 

Case 2:06-cv-02843-JAM -KJM Document 12 Filed 03/12/07 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-3-

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

II. 

ORDER

The court, having reviewed the papers filed in support of, and the absence of any opposition 

to, this stipulation and good cause appearing therefore; 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that STATE FARM’s motion to dismiss is DENIED IN PART, 

AND GRANTED IN PART, as follows: 

1. The motion to dismiss the second cause of action for breach of insurance contract on 

the grounds the complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted regarding this cause 

of action is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; 

2. The motion to dismiss the third cause of action for negligence on the grounds the 

complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted regarding this cause of action is 

GRANTED; 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that STATE FARM’s motion 

to dismiss shall be DENIED IN PART, and GRANTED IN PART, consistent herewith and, the third 

cause of action is hereby DISMISSED. 

 

Dated: March 9, 2007 

 /s/ David F. Levi__________________________

THE HONORABLE DAVID F. LEVI 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF 

CALIFORNIA 

Case 2:06-cv-02843-JAM -KJM Document 12 Filed 03/12/07 Page 3 of 3