Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-02222/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-02222-6/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Hawkins
Defendant
Bernard L. Smith
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

BERNARD L. SMITH, 

Plaintiff, 

v.

HAWKINS, et al., 

Defendants.

No. 2:14-cv-2222-KJM-EFB P 

ORDER 

 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action 

seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate 

Judge as provided by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

 On April 28, 2015, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, 

which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the 

findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has not filed 

objections to the findings and recommendations. 

 The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United 

States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are 

reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 

1983). Having reviewed the file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be 

supported by the record and by the proper analysis.

Case 2:14-cv-02222-KJM-EFB Document 29 Filed 08/10/15 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 

 1. The findings and recommendations filed April 28, 2015, are adopted in full; 

and

 2. Plaintiff’s motion for injunctive relief (ECF No. 12) is denied. 

DATED: August 10, 2015. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 2:14-cv-02222-KJM-EFB Document 29 Filed 08/10/15 Page 2 of 2