Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-01530/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-01530-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Mike Prizmitch
Defendant
Monica Staar
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MONICA STAAR, 

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-05-1530 FCD DAD PS

vs.

MIKE PRIZMITCH, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed the above-entitled action. The matter was

referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 72-302(c)(21).

On August 3, 2005, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations

herein which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections

to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Plaintiff has not filed

objections to the findings and recommendations.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be

supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY

ORDERED that: 

1. The findings and recommendations filed August 3, 2005, are adopted in full;

and

Case 2:05-cv-01530-FCD-DAD Document 6 Filed 09/09/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

2. This action is dismissed without prejudice. See L.R. 11-110; Fed. R. Civ. P.

41(b).

DATED:September 8, 2005

/s/ Frank C. Damrell Jr. 

FRANK C. DAMRELL JR.

United States District Judge

Case 2:05-cv-01530-FCD-DAD Document 6 Filed 09/09/05 Page 2 of 2