Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca11-16-11543/USCOURTS-ca11-16-11543-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Joshua Curtis Clark
Appellant
United States of America
Appellee

Document Text:

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 16-11543

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D.C. Docket No. 1:15-cr-00215-CG-B-1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JOSHUA CURTIS CLARK, 

 Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Alabama

________________________

(January 17, 2017)

Before MARTIN, JORDAN and ROSENBAUM, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: 

USCA11 Case: 16-11543 Date Filed: 01/17/2017 Page: 1 of 2
2

William Hughes, appointed counsel for Joshua Clark in this direct criminal 

appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and 

filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396 (1967). 

Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of 

the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the 

entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is 

GRANTED, and Clark’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

USCA11 Case: 16-11543 Date Filed: 01/17/2017 Page: 2 of 2