Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-09-08137/USCOURTS-ca4-09-08137-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
United States of America
Appellee
David Issac Worrell
Appellant

Document Text:

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-8137

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

DAVID ISSAC WORRELL, a/k/a David Patrick Worrell,

Defendant – Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, 

Senior District Judge. (4:03-cr-00049-H-1)

Submitted: January 19, 2010 Decided: February 22, 2010

Before MICHAEL and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

David Issac Worrell, Appellant Pro Se. Steve R. Matheny, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 09-8137 Doc: 9 Filed: 02/22/2010 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

David Issac Worrell appeals the district court’s order 

denying his motion for modification of his sentence. We have 

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, 

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See

United States v. Worrell, No. 4:03-cr-00049-H-1 (E.D.N.C. Oct. 

21, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

AFFIRMED

Appeal: 09-8137 Doc: 9 Filed: 02/22/2010 Pg: 2 of 2