Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca8-05-02612/USCOURTS-ca8-05-02612-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Gary Bernard Cain
Appellant
United States of America
Appellee

Document Text:

*

The Honorable Ann D. Montgomery, United States District Judge for the

District of Minnesota. 

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 05-2612

___________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the District

v. * of Minnesota.

*

Gary Bernard Cain, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Appellant. *

___________

Submitted: February 13, 2006

Filed: February 17, 2006

___________

Before WOLLMAN, FAGG, and ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Gary Bernard Cain pleaded guilty to three counts of bank robbery. At the plea

hearing, Cain agreed he was a career offender based on his criminal history, and his

resulting sentencing guidelines range was 168-210 months. After the district court

rejected his objections to the presentence report at sentencing, Cain agreed the 168-

210 range was correct. The district court*

 sentenced Cain at the bottom of the

advisory guidelines range to 168 months in prison and three years of supervised

release. Cain appeals arguing his post-Booker sentence is unreasonably long and the

Appellate Case: 05-2612 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/17/2006 Entry ID: 2011107
-2-

district court failed to cite sentencing factors contained in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a). Cain

has not overcome the presumption that his sentence within the advisory guidelines

range is reasonable. See United States v. Lincoln, 413 F.3d 716, 717-18 (8th Cir.

2005). The district court properly considered the guidelines range and applied the

other factors in § 3553(a), including the nature, seriousness, and circumstances of the

offense, Cain’s criminal history and characteristics, and the need to promote respect

for the law, provide just punishment, and deter criminal conduct. The district court

was not required to enumerate each factor listed in § 3553(a). United States v.

Lamoreaux, 422 F.3d 750, 756 (8th Cir. 2005). The court also stated reasons why the

factors supported a sentence of 168 months. 

Considering the record as a whole, we cannot say the district court imposed an

unreasonable sentence. Accordingly, we affirm. 

______________________________

Appellate Case: 05-2612 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/17/2006 Entry ID: 2011107