Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-10-01363/USCOURTS-ca4-10-01363-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Wendy B. Dauberman
Petitioner

Document Text:

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-1363

In Re: WENDY B. DAUBERMAN,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.

(3:07-cr-00040-HEH-2)

Submitted: May 20, 2010 Decided: May 26, 2010

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Wendy B. Dauberman, Petitioner Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 10-1363 Doc: 5 Filed: 05/26/2010 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Wendy B. Dauberman petitions for a writ of mandamus, 

alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on her 28 

U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2009) motion. She seeks an order 

from this court directing the district court to act. Our review 

of the district court’s docket reveals that the district court 

has denied Dauberman’s § 2255 motion, without prejudice. 

Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma 

pauperis, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We dispense 

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process. 

PETITION DENIED

Appeal: 10-1363 Doc: 5 Filed: 05/26/2010 Pg: 2 of 2