Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_06-cv-00963/USCOURTS-cand-4_06-cv-00963-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Kangana Beri
Plaintiff
Tata America International Corporation
Defendant
Tata Consultancy Services, Ltd
Defendant
Tata Sons, Ltd
Defendant
Gopi Vedachalam
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

LA1546622.1 

20562510005 

06/09/2006 brk Case No. 06 CIV 963 (VRW) – Stipulation and Order

LOEB & LOEB LLP 

MICHELLE LA MAR (State Bar No. 163038) 

mlamar@loeb.com 

BENJAMIN R. KING (State Bar No. 205447) 

bking@loeb.com 

JON DARYANANI (State Bar No. 205149) 

jdaryanani@loeb.com 

10100 Santa Monica Boulevard, Suite 2200 

Los Angeles, California 90067-4120 

Telephone: 310-282-2000 

Facsimile: 310-282-2200 

KELLEY DRYE & WARREN LLP 

WILLIAM A. ESCOBAR (Admitted, Pro Hac Vice) 

wescobar@kelleydrye.com 

ROBERT I. STEINER (Admitted, Pro Hac Vice) 

rsteiner@kelleydrye.com 

KEVIN J. SMITH (Admitted, Pro Hac Vice) 

ksmith@kelleydrye.com 

101 Park Avenue 

New York, New York 10178 

Telephone: (212) 808-7800 

Facsimile: (212) 808-7897 

Attorneys for Defendants 

TATA AMERICA INTERNATIONAL 

CORPORATION, TATA CONSULTANCY 

SERVICES, LTD. and TATA SONS, LTD. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

GOPI VEDACHALAM and KANGANA 

BERI, on behalf of themselves and all others 

similarly situated, 

Plaintiffs, 

 v. 

TATA AMERICA INTERNATIONAL 

CORPORATION, a New York corporation; 

TATA CONSULTANCY SERVICES, LTD., 

an Indian corporation; and TATA SONS, 

LTD., an Indian corporation, 

Defendants. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Case No. 06 CIV 963 (VRW) 

STIPULATION AND ORDER 

EXTENDING DEFENDANTS’ TIME TO 

RESPOND TO FIRST AMENDED 

COMPLAINT 

[N.D. Local Rule 6-1]

Case 4:06-cv-00963-CW Document 29 Filed 06/12/06 Page 1 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

- 2 - LA1546622.1 

20562510005 

06/09/2006 brk Case No. 06 CIV 963 (VRW) – Stipulation and Order

Pursuant to Rule 6-1 of this Court’s Civil Local Rules, Plaintiffs Gopi Vedachalam and 

Kangana Beri, and defendants Tata America International Corporation, Tata Consultancy 

Services, Ltd. and Tata Sons, Ltd. (collectively “Defendants”), by and amongst themselves, hereby 

stipulate as follows: 

Defendants’ time to respond to the First Amended Complaint in the above-captioned 

matter shall be extended by an additional 29 days (from June 15, 2006 to July 14, 2006). 

Defendants have received no prior extensions of their time to respond to the First Amended 

Complaint. 

The parties further acknowledge that Defendants’ motion to dismiss the original complaint 

in this matter is withdrawn without prejudice and is taken off calendar. However, Defendants’ 

motion to compel arbitration and to 

/ / / 

/ / / 

/ / / 

/ / / 

/ / / 

/ / / 

/ / / 

/ / / 

/ / / 

/ / / 

/ / / 

/ / / 

/ / / 

/ / / 

/ / / 

/ / / 

/ / / 

Case 4:06-cv-00963-CW Document 29 Filed 06/12/06 Page 2 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

- 3 - LA1546622.1 

20562510005 

06/09/2006 brk Case No. 06 CIV 963 (VRW) – Stipulation and Order

dismiss, or alternatively, to stay the action shall remain on calendar (for hearing on July 13, 2006 

as previously noticed). 

Dated: June 9, 2006 LOEB & LOEB LLP 

By: /s/ Michelle M. La Mar

Michelle M. La Mar 

Attorneys for Defendants 

TATA AMERICA INTERNATIONAL 

CORPORATION; TATA CONSULTANCY 

SERVICES, LTD.; and TATA SONS, LTD 

Dated: June 9, 2006 KELLEY DRYE & WARREN LLP 

By: /s/ Kevin J. Smith 

Kevin J. Smith 

Attorneys for Defendants 

TATA AMERICA INTERNATIONAL 

CORPORATION; TATA CONSULTANCY 

SERVICES, LTD.; and TATA SONS, LTD 

Dated: June 9, 2006 LEIFF, CABRASER, HEIMANN & 

BERNSTEIN, LLP 

By: /s/ Steven M. Tindall by PEL w/permission 

Steven M. Tindall 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

GOPI VEDACHALAM and KANGANA 

BERI, on behalf of themselves and others 

similarly situated 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

6/9/2006

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GRANTED

Judge Vaughn R Walker

Case 4:06-cv-00963-CW Document 29 Filed 06/12/06 Page 3 of 3