Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-14-02356/USCOURTS-ca4-14-02356-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Bank of America
Appellee
John S. Stritzinger
Appellant
Vernon Wright
Appellee

Document Text:

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-2356

JOHN S. STRITZINGER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

BANK OF AMERICA; VERNON WRIGHT,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Columbia. Terry L. Wooten, Chief District 

Judge. (3:14-cv-02409-TLW)

Submitted: May 18, 2016 Decided: May 20, 2016

Before SHEDD, DIAZ, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John S. Stritzinger, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 14-2356 Doc: 28 Filed: 05/20/2016 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

John S. Stritzinger appeals the district court’s order 

adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and dismissing 

his complaint without prejudice for failing to comply with a 

court order.* On appeal, we confine our review to the issues 

raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). 

Because Stritzinger’s informal brief does not challenge the 

basis for the district court’s disposition, Stritzinger has 

forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. Accordingly, 

we grant Stritzinger leave to proceed in forma pauperis, deny 

the motion to remand, and affirm the district court’s judgment. 

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

 * We conclude that Stritzinger timely filed his notice of 

appeal. See Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266, 276 (1988).

Appeal: 14-2356 Doc: 28 Filed: 05/20/2016 Pg: 2 of 2