Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-00673/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-00673-3/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Lawrence Anthony
Petitioner
J. W. Sullivan
Respondent

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

U.S. District Court

 E. D. California cd 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LAWRENCE ANTHONY, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

)

v. )

)

)

J. W. SULLIVAN, Warden, )

)

Respondent. )

 )

1:07-CV-00673 AWI GSA HC

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND 

RECOMMENDATION 

[Doc. #12]

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS

AND DISMISSING PETITION FOR WRIT

OF HABEAS CORPUS

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT

TO ENTER JUDGMENT 

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. 

On August 28, 2007, the Magistrate Judge issued a Findings and Recommendation that

recommended Respondent’s motion to dismiss be GRANTED and the petition for writ of habeas

corpus be DISMISSED for failure to exhaust state remedies. This Findings and Recommendation

was served on all parties and contained notice that any objections to the Findings and

Recommendation were to be filed within thirty (30) days of the date of service of the order. Over

thirty (30) days have passed and no party has filed objections.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a de

Case 1:07-cv-00673-AWI-GSA Document 14 Filed 10/17/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

U.S. District Court

 E. D. California cd 2

novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds that the Findings

and Recommendation is supported by the record and proper analysis. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendation issued August 28, 2007, is ADOPTED IN FULL; 

2. Respondent’s motion to dismiss is GRANTED;

3. The petition for writ of habeas corpus is DISMISSED without prejudice; and

4. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to enter judgment.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 16, 2007 /s/ Anthony W. Ishii 

0m8i78 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:07-cv-00673-AWI-GSA Document 14 Filed 10/17/07 Page 2 of 2