Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-00565/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-00565-2/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Estate of Donald Ray Haynes
Plaintiff
Anntionett Haynes
Plaintiff
Sylvia Haynes
Plaintiff
Robert Johnson
Defendant
William Kambic
Defendant
Ryan Morris
Defendant
Dana Mosher
Defendant

Document Text:

1

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR CONTINUANCE OF PRETRIAL SCHEDULING DEADLINE

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

JOHN L. BURRIS, State Bar No. 69888

DEWITT M. LACY, State Bar No. 258789

The Law Offices of John L. Burris

7677 Oakport Street, Suite 1120

Oakland, CA 94621

Telephone: (510) 839-5200

Facsimile: (510) 839-3882

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

JOHN M. LUEBBERKE, City Attorney

State Bar No. 164893

JAMES F. WILSON, Deputy City Attorney

State Bar No. 107289

TED DANIEL WOOD, Deputy City Attorney

State Bar No. 191768

425 N. El Dorado Street, 2nd Floor

Stockton, CA 95202

Telephone: (209) 937-8333

Facsimile: (209) 937-8898

Attorneys for Defendants

ROBERT JOHNSON, WILLIAM KAMBIC, DANA MOSHER, and RYAN MORRIS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SYLVIA HAYNES, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

vs.

ROBERT JOHNSON, et al.,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 2:15-CV-00565-WBS-CKD

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR 

CONTINUANCE OF PRETRIAL 

SCHEDULING ORDER DEADLINES, 

INCLUDING TRIAL 

Assigned: Hon. William B. Shubb

Assigned: Hon. Carolyn K. Delaney, United States 

Magistrate Judge

Complaint Filed: March 13, 2015

Trial Date: November 8, 2016

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiffs SYLVIA HAYNES, 

individually and as successor-in-interest to Decedent DONALD RAY HAYNES; 

ANNTIONETT HAYNES, individually; THE ESTATE OF DONALD RAY HAYNES, and 

Defendants ROBERT JOHNSON, WILLIAM KAMBIC, DANA MOSHER, and 

RYAN MORRIS, by and through their counsel of record, DeWitt Lacy, Law Offices of John 

Burris; and Defendants, City of Stockton, et al., by and through attorneys of record, Ted Wood, 

Office of the City Attorney, that the following deadlines be continued:

Case 2:15-cv-00565-WBS-DB Document 22 Filed 06/20/16 Page 1 of 3
2

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR CONTINUANCE OF PRETRIAL SCHEDULING DEADLINE

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Non-expert Discovery Completion September 6, 2016 (Prior date was June 6, 2016)

Expert Disclosures August 1, 2016 (Prior date was April 25, 2016)

Rebuttal Expert Disclosure August 21, 2016 (Prior date was May 20, 2016)

Expert Discovery Completion October 18, 2016 (Prior date was June 6, 2016)

Motion Hearing Schedule (for filing) December 19, 2016 (Prior date was June 24, 2016)

Final Pretrial Conference February 27, 2017 at 9:00 a.m.

(Prior date was September 12, 2016)

Jury Trial April 25, 2017 at 9:00 a.m.

(Prior date was November 8, 2016)

The brief continuance is requested to permit counsel for Plaintiffs to file and have heard a 

motion to withdraw as counsel and to permit Plaintiffs the opportunity to either secure new 

counsel or prepare to try their case in pro per. The continuance is also requested as there remain 

several outstanding discovery issues that will need to be addressed following counsel’s motion to 

withdraw. The parties respectfully request the Court grant this stipulation to allow them adequate 

time to prepare the case for trial.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Dated: May31, 2016 JOHN M. LUEBBERKE

CITY ATTORNEY

BY /s/ Ted Daniel Wood

 TED DANIEL WOOD

 Deputy City Attorney

 Attorneys for Defendants

 CITY OF STOCKTON, et al.

Dated: May 31, 2016 LAW OFFICES OF JOHN L. BURRIS

By /s/ Dewitt M. Lacy__

DEWITT M. LACY

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

///

///

Case 2:15-cv-00565-WBS-DB Document 22 Filed 06/20/16 Page 2 of 3
3

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR CONTINUANCE OF PRETRIAL SCHEDULING DEADLINE

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

///

///

O R D E R

In accordance with the parties’ stipulation, and good cause appearing, the deadline for the 

completion of discovery, expert discovery, the motion hearing schedule, the final pretrial 

conference, and the trial date specified above are continued with the foregoing request. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 17, 2016

Case 2:15-cv-00565-WBS-DB Document 22 Filed 06/20/16 Page 3 of 3