Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca5-15-11160/USCOURTS-ca5-15-11160-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Joanna Espinoza Reyna
Appellant
United States of America
Appellee

Document Text:

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-11160

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JOANNA ESPINOZA REYNA, also known as Joanna Reyna Espinoza,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 5:11-CR-56-1

Before JONES, CLEMENT, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Joanna Espinoza Reyna

raises an argument that is foreclosed by United States v. Shabazz, 633 F.3d 

342, 345-46 (5th Cir. 2011), which held that the phrase “on any such 

revocation” in 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(3) does not impose an aggregate limit on 

imprisonment for revocation of supervised release but limits only the amount 

of imprisonment that may be imposed each time a court revokes a defendant’s

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

June 21, 2016

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 15-11160 Document: 00513556925 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/21/2016
No. 15-11160

2

supervised release. Accordingly, the motion for summary affirmance is

GRANTED, the alternative motion for an extension of time to file a brief is 

DENIED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

 Case: 15-11160 Document: 00513556925 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/21/2016