Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-alsd-1_15-cv-00050/USCOURTS-alsd-1_15-cv-00050-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Houston County
Respondent
Rey Francisco Rosario
Petitioner

Document Text:

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

REY FRANCISCO ROSARIO, :

Petitioner, :

vs. : CA 15-0050-CB-C

HOUSTON COUNTY, ALABAMA, :

Respondent.

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Petitioner, a state prisoner presently housed at Bullock County Correctional 

Facility in Bullock County, Alabama, filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus, pursuant 

to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, in this Court on January 31, 2015. (Doc. 1.) Petitioner challenges the 

validity of his December 2, 2011 attempted theft of property conviction in the Circuit 

Court of Houston County, Alabama. (See id. at 1.) 

The undersigned notes that Bullock County, Alabama, where Rosario is 

presently housed, is in the Northern Division of the Middle District of Alabama, see 28 

U.S.C. § 81(b)(1) (“The Northern Division [of the Middle District of Alabama] comprises 

the counties of Autauga, Barbour, Bullock, Butler, Chilton, Coosa, Covington, 

Crenshaw, Elmore, Lowndes, Montgomery, and Pike.” (emphasis supplied)), while the 

county of conviction, Houston County, Alabama, is located in the Southern Division of 

the Middle District of Alabama, see 28 U.S.C. § 81(b)(2) (“The Southern Division [of the 

Middle District of Alabama] comprises the counties of Coffee, Dale, Geneva, Henry, and

Houston.” (emphasis supplied)).

28 U.S.C. § 2241(d) confers concurrent jurisdiction over habeas corpus petitions 

upon the districts of confinement and conviction. This Court does not even enjoy

Case 1:15-cv-00050-CB-C Document 3 Filed 02/06/15 Page 1 of 3
2

concurrent jurisdiction in this action, since Rosario was convicted in and is presently 

confined in the Middle District of Alabama. Accordingly, this action is due to be 

transferred to the Middle District of Alabama, the district of conviction and 

confinement. Compare 28 U.S.C. § 2241(d) (“Where an application for a writ of habeas 

corpus is made by a person in custody under the judgment and sentence of a State court 

of a State which contains two or more Federal judicial districts, the application may be 

filed in the district court for the district wherein such person is in custody or in the 

district court for the district within which the State court was held which convicted 

and sentenced him and each of such district courts shall have concurrent jurisdiction to 

entertain the application.” (emphasis supplied)) with Greeson v. Crews, 2014 WL 7178515, 

*1 (N.D. Fla. Dec. 15, 2014) (transferring case to the Middle District of Florida, the 

district of conviction and confinement).

Based upon the foregoing, it is recommended that, in the furtherance of justice, 

this action be transferred to the United States District Court for the Middle District of 

Alabama for any and all further proceedings.1

NOTICE OF RIGHT TO FILE OBJECTIONS

A copy of this report and recommendation shall be served on all parties in the 

manner provided by law. Any party who objects to this recommendation or anything in 

it must, within fourteen (14) days of the date of service of this document, file specific 

written objections with the Clerk of this Court. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); FED.R.CIV.P. 

72(b); S.D.ALA. L.R. 72.4. The parties should note that under Eleventh Circuit precedent, 

“the failure to object limits the scope of [] appellate review to plain error review of the 

 1 The undersigned does not rule on petitioner’s motion for leave to proceed in 

forma pauperis (Doc. 2) because this is a decision best left to the United States District Court for 

the Middle District of Alabama. 

Case 1:15-cv-00050-CB-C Document 3 Filed 02/06/15 Page 2 of 3
3

magistrate judge’s factual findings.” Dupree v. Warden, 715 F.3d 1295, 1300 (11th Cir. 

2013) (emphasis in original). In order to be specific, an objection must identify the 

specific finding or recommendation to which objection is made, state the basis for the 

objection, and specify the place in the Magistrate Judge’s report and recommendation 

where the disputed determination is found. An objection that merely incorporates by 

reference or refers to the briefing before the Magistrate Judge is not specific.

DONE this the 5th day of February, 2015.

s/WILLIAM E. CASSADY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:15-cv-00050-CB-C Document 3 Filed 02/06/15 Page 3 of 3