Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_16-cv-00446/USCOURTS-caed-1_16-cv-00446-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Commissioner of Social Security
Defendant
Rashpal Singh
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RASHPAL SINGH,

Plaintiff,

v.

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL 

SECURITY,

Defendant.

Case No.: 1:16-cv-00446-SAB

ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME 

AND MODIFYING SCHEDULING ORDER

(ECF No. 12)

On November 10, 2016, Plaintiff filed a stipulation requesting an extension of time to file 

his opening brief. (ECF No. 12.) Pursuant to the stipulation, Plaintiff will file his opening brief 

on or before November 25, 2016. This request is granted, and the scheduling order is modified 

as follows:

1. Plaintiff’s opening brief shall be filed on or before November 25, 2016;

2. Defendant’s responsive brief shall be filed on or before January 6, 2017;

3. Plaintiff may file a reply brief on or before January 26, 2017; and

4. The parties are advised that due to the impact of social security cases on the 

Court’s docket and the Court’s desire to have cases decided in an expedient 

manner, requests for modification of the briefing schedule will not routinely be 

granted and will only be granted upon a showing of good cause. Further, requests 

Case 1:16-cv-00446-SAB Document 13 Filed 11/15/16 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

to modify the briefing schedule that are made on the eve of a deadline will be 

looked upon with disfavor and may be denied absent good cause for the delay in 

seeking an extension.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: November 14, 2016 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:16-cv-00446-SAB Document 13 Filed 11/15/16 Page 2 of 2