Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-01745/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-01745-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Marriott International, Inc.
Defendant
Donilee Salazar
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

LAWRANCE A. BOHM, (SBN 208716)

ATTORNEY AT LAW

2121 Natomas Crossing Drive

Suite 200-251

Sacramento, CA 95834

Bohmlaw@yahoo.com

(916) 595-2908

FAX (916) 265-5665

Attorney for Plaintiff

DONILEE SALAZAR

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DONILEE SALAZAR,

Plaintiff,

v.

MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC., and

DOES 1-100, inclusive,

Defendant.

Case No. 1:05 CV 00936 AWI-LJO 

PLAINTIFF’S EX PARTE

APPLICATION TO TRANSFER

VENUE TO SACRAMENTO AND

ORDER

Plaintiff, DONILEE SALAZAR, respectfully submits the instant Ex Parte Application to

Transfer Venue of the above captioned matter to the Sacramento Division of the United States

District Court, Eastern District of California. 

 Plaintiff hereby requests the transfer of this matter to Sacramento due to human error in

the submission of this matter via the CM/ECF system which inexplicably designated this case as

a Fresno matter. As indicated on the Civil Case Cover Sheet filed in conjunction with the

Complaint, Plaintiff intended to have this matter heard in the Sacramento division. Both Plaintiff

and Defendant would suffer undue economic and temporal expense if this matter were permitted

to proceed in the Fresno division as Counsel for Plaintiff is located in Sacramento and counsel for

Defendant is located in San Francisco.

Case 2:05-cv-01745-GEB -KJM Document 6 Filed 08/30/05 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 2

Plaintiff’s counsel only learned of the erroneous assignment of this matter to the Fresno

division on Friday, August 19, 2005 when he was following up on his failure to receive an

electronic copy of the summons and new case documents after filing the matter. During

consultation with the Clerk in the Sacramento Division, Plaintiff’s counsel was advised to rectify

the incorrect venue as herein presented. 

WHEREFORE, Plaintiff respectfully requests that this matter be transferred to the

Sacramento division for issuance of a proper Summons and new case documents.

Dated: August 25, 2005 Respectfully Submitted,

/s/ Lawrance A. Bohm

___________________________________

Lawrance A. Bohm, Esq.

Attorney for Plaintiff

Case 2:05-cv-01745-GEB -KJM Document 6 Filed 08/30/05 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 3

ORDER

Having read and considered the above Application, and good cause appearing, therein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the venue of this matter shall be transferred to the

Sacramento Division of the United States District Court, Eastern District of California.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 26, 2005 /s/ Anthony W. Ishii 

0m8i78 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:05-cv-01745-GEB -KJM Document 6 Filed 08/30/05 Page 3 of 3