Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-00386/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-00386-4/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Steve Wilhelm
Plaintiff
Jeannie Woodford
Defendant

Document Text:

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Plaintiff Steve Wilhelm is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action 

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 

Now pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion for appointment of counsel filed on 

September 24, 2013.

On September 10, 2013, the Court dismissed Plaintiff’s complaint, with leave to amend, for 

failure to state a claim. Plaintiff was granted thirty days from the date of service of that order to file an 

amended complaint. 

On September 24, Plaintiff filed a notice of appeal of the Court’s September 10, 2013, 

screening order. 

Plaintiff’s motion for appointment of counsel is directed to the United States Court of Appeal 

for the Ninth Circuit. Because Plaintiff has filed a notice of appeal and is apparently seeking counsel 

STEVEN WILHELM,

 Plaintiff,

v.

JEANNIE WOODFORD, et al.,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: 1:12-cv-00386-AWI-SAB (PC)

ORDER DENYING PETITIONER’S MOTION 

FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL WITHOUT 

PREJUDICE

[ECF No. 18]

Case 1:12-cv-00386-AWI-SAB Document 21 Filed 09/27/13 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

to assist with his appeal, the instant motion is DENIED, to re-filing the motion in the Court of 

Appeals. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 26, 2013 _ _

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:12-cv-00386-AWI-SAB Document 21 Filed 09/27/13 Page 2 of 2