Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-14-07139/USCOURTS-ca4-14-07139-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Argline
Appellee
Brown
Appellee
Mr. Craze
Appellee
Ms. Johnson
Appellee
Mr. Nelson
Appellee
Nathaniel Singleton
Appellant
Mr. Taylor
Appellee
Ms. Venton
Appellee

Document Text:

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 14-7139

NATHANIEL SINGLETON, 

 Plaintiff - Appellant, 

 v. 

FOOD SERVICE OFFICER MR. NELSON; FOOD SERVICE MR. TAYLOR; 

FOOD SERVICE MR. CRAZE; FOOD SERVICE MS. JOHNSON; FOOD 

SERVICE MS. VENTON; ADMINISTRATIVE FOOD SERVICE BROWN; 

ADMINISTRATIVE FOOD SERVICE ARGLINE, 

 Defendants - Appellees. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Aiken. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge. 

(1:12-cv-02985-RBH) 

Submitted: December 18, 2014 Decided: December 22, 2014 

Before SHEDD, WYNN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. 

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Nathaniel Singleton, Appellant Pro Se. Marshall Prince, II, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for 

Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 

Dismissed by Supreme Court, June 29, 2015

Appeal: 14-7139 Doc: 9 Filed: 12/22/2014 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Nathaniel Singleton appeals the district court’s order 

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying 

relief on his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown 

Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). 

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district 

court. Singleton v. Nelson, No. 1:12-cv-02985-RBH (D.S.C. July 

24, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

AFFIRMED

Appeal: 14-7139 Doc: 9 Filed: 12/22/2014 Pg: 2 of 2