Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-15-01991/USCOURTS-ca4-15-01991-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Hong Qing Huang
Petitioner
Loretta E. Lynch
Respondent

Document Text:

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-1991

HONG QING HUANG,

Petitioner,

v.

LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration 

Appeals.

Submitted: April 19, 2016 Decided: April 29, 2016

Before SHEDD, DIAZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Theodore N. Cox, New York, New York, for Petitioner. Benjamin 

C. Mizer, Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General, Emily 

Anne Radford, Assistant Director, Sarah Pergolizzi, Office of 

Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, 

Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 15-1991 Doc: 22 Filed: 04/29/2016 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Hong Qing Huang, a native and citizen of the People’s 

Republic of China, petitions for review of an order of the Board 

of Immigration Appeals (“Board”) denying her motion to reopen. 

We have reviewed the administrative record and the Board’s order 

and conclude that the Board did not abuse its discretion in 

denying the motion as untimely and number-barred. See 8 C.F.R. 

§ 1003.2(c)(2) (2015). We therefore deny the petition for 

review for the reasons stated by the Board. See In re Huang

(B.I.A. Aug. 4, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because 

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

Appeal: 15-1991 Doc: 22 Filed: 04/29/2016 Pg: 2 of 2