Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_14-cv-01873/USCOURTS-caed-1_14-cv-01873-7/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Bakersfield Police Department
Defendant
City of Bakersfield
Defendant
Ryan Miller
Defendant
Jesse Trevino
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Michael G. Marderosian, No. 77296

Heather S. Cohen, No. 263093

MARDEROSIAN & COHEN

1260 Fulton Mall

Fresno, CA 93721

Telephone: (559) 441-7991

Facsimile: (559) 441-8170

Virginia Gennaro, No. 138877

City Attorney

CITY OF BAKERSFIELD

1501 Truxtun Avenue

Bakersfield, CA 93301

Telephone: (661) 326-3721

Facsimile: (661) 852-2020

Attorneys for: Defendants BAKERSFIELD POLICE DEPARTMENT, CITY OF 

BAKERSFIELD and RYAN MILLER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JESSE TREVINO,

Plaintiff,

vs.

BAKERSFIELD POLICE DEPARTMENT, 

CITY OF BAKERSFIELD, RYAN MILLER,

and DOES 1 to 100, inclusive,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 1:14-CV-01873-JLT

STIPULATION TO DISMISS FIRST CAUSE 

OF ACTION (MONELL CLAIM) AGAINST

THE CITY OF BAKERSIFELD; SECOND 

CAUSE OF ACTION FOR VIOLATION OF 

THE REHABILITATION ACT OF 1973 

AGAINST RYAN MILLER; THIRD CAUSE 

OF ACTION FOR VIOLATION OF TITLE II 

OF THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES 

ACT OF 1990 AGAINST RYAN MILLER; 

FOURTH CAUSE OF ACTION FOR 

VIOLATION OF THE BANE CIVIL RIGHTS 

ACT, CALIFORNIA CIVIL CODE SECTION 

52.1; AND SIXTH CAUSE OF ACTION FOR 

INTENTIONAL INFLICTION OF 

EMOTIONAL DISTRESS UNDER 

CALIFORNIA LAW AGAINST ALL 

DEFENDANTS; [PROPOSED] ORDER 

THEREON

(Doc. 34)

Case 1:14-cv-01873-JLT Document 35 Filed 02/11/16 Page 1 of 3
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Plaintiff JESSE TREVINO and Defendants CITY OF BAKERSFIELD and RYAN MILLER, by 

and through their attorneys of record herein, hereby stipulate and agree that:

1. The Plaintiff’s First Cause of Action for violation of Plaintiff’s rights secured by the 

Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution to be secure in his home and residence, and to be 

free from the use of excessive force and unlawful search and/or seizure, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. Sections 

1983, 1988 (Monell Claim) should be dismissed with prejudice as to Defendant City of Bakersfield;

2. The Plaintiff’s Second Cause of Action for violation of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, 

29 U.S.C. Section 701 et seq. should be dismissed with prejudice as to Defendant Ryan Miller;

3. The Plaintiff’s Third Cause of Action for violation of Title II of the Americans with 

Disabilities Act of 1990, 42 U.S.C. Section 12131 et seq. should be dismissed with prejudice as to 

Defendant Ryan Miller; 

4. The Plaintiff’s Fourth Cause of Action for violation of the Bane Civil Rights Act, 

California Civil Code Section 52.1 under California law should be dismissed with prejudice as to All 

Defendants; and 

5. The Plaintiff’s Sixth Cause of Action for intentional infliction of emotion distress under 

California law should be dismissed with prejudice as to All Defendants.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Dated: February 11, 2016 RODRIGUEZ & ASSOCIATES

/s/ John Kawai

By:__________________________________

John Kawai,

Attorneys for Plaintiff

Dated: February 11, 2016 MARDEROSIAN & COHEN

/s/ Michael G. Marderosian

By:_________________________________

Michael G. Marderosian,

Attorneys for Defendants 

above-named.

Case 1:14-cv-01873-JLT Document 35 Filed 02/11/16 Page 2 of 3
3

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Pursuant the stipulation of the parties hereto, the Court ORDERS:

1. The Plaintiff’s First Cause of Action DISMISSED with PREJUDICE as to Defendant 

City of Bakersfield;

2. The Plaintiff’s Second Cause of is DISMISSED with PREJUDICE as to Defendant 

Ryan Miller;

3. The Plaintiff’s Third Cause of Action DISMISSED with PREJUDICE as to Defendant 

Ryan Miller;

4. The Plaintiff’s Fourth Cause of Action DISMISSED with PREJUDICE as to All 

Defendants; and 

5. The Plaintiff’s Sixth Cause of Action DISMISSED with PREJUDICE as to All 

Defendants.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 11, 2016 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:14-cv-01873-JLT Document 35 Filed 02/11/16 Page 3 of 3