Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cr-00553/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cr-00553-3/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Lloyd Jamison
Defendant
USA
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

RE-SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE & DOCUMENTING EXCLUSION OF TIME 1

IAN LOVESETH, SBN 085780

Attorney at Law

819 Eddy Street

San Francisco, California 94109

Tel: (415) 771-6174

Fax: (415) 474-3748

Attorney for Defendant

LLOYD JAMISON 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

--o0o--

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

NO. CR-05-00553-VRW

Plaintiff,

STIPULATION AND

[PROPOSED]ORDER RE-SETTING

BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND

DOCUMENTING EXCLUSION OF

TIME

vs.

LLOYD JAMISON,

Defendant.

/

IAN G. LOVESETH, attorney for defendant, LLOYD JAMISON, and SUSAN JERICH,

Assistant United States Attorney, hereby stipulate that the briefing schedule in this matter shall

be as follows: Pretrial Motion Hearing shall be set for March 7, 2006 at 10:30 AM in Courtroom

6, 17th Floor, San Francisco, CA before the Hon. Vaughn R. Walker. Defendant shall file

supplements to his pretrial motions by January 18, 2006. (Defendant has already filed his pretrial

motions, however, the parties stipulate that defendant may complete his investigation and

supplement these motions and/or file additional motions.) The government shall file its

opposition by February 1, 2006. Defendant shall file his reply by February 15, 2006.

Case 3:05-cr-00553-VRW Document 20 Filed 12/22/2005 Page 1 of 2 Case 3:05-cr-00553-VRW Document 21 Filed 12/23/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

RE-SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE & DOCUMENTING EXCLUSION OF TIME 2

The Court hereby finds, as follows: 

1. Taking into account the public interest in the prompt disposition of criminal cases, resetting the briefing schedule and continuing the Pretrial Motion Hearing until March 7, 2006 is

necessary for effective preparation as it will allow defense counsel to complete his investigation. 

2. The ends of justice served by excluding the period from January 31, 2006 to March 7,

2006 outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant, Mr. Jamison, in a speedy trial. 

See, 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(A). (The Court had initially set the Pretrial Motion Hearing for

January 31, 2006; hence, the period up to January 31, 2006 has already been excluded from the

Speedy Trial Act calculations.)

Accordingly, and with the consent of the defendant, the Court hereby: (1) sets a Pretrial

Motion Hearing for March 7, 2006 at 10:30 AM in Courtroom 6, 17th Floor, San Francisco, CA

before the Hon. Vaughn R. Walker. Defendant shall file his pretrial motions by January 18,

2006. The government shall file its opposition by February 1, 2006. Defendant shall file his

reply by February 15, 2006; and, (2) orders that the period of time from January 31, 2006 to

March 7, 2006 be excluded from the Speedy Trial Act calculations under 18 U.S.C. §

3161(h)(8)(A) and (B)(ii) and (iv).

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

DATED: December 22, 2005 /s/ Ian G. Loveseth

IAN G. LOVESETH

Attorney for Defendant

LLOYD JAMISON

DATED: December 22, 2005 /s/ Susan Jerich

SUSAN JERICH

Assistant United States Attorney

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: December ____, 2005

_______________________________

Hon. VAUGHN R. WALKER

United States District Court Judge

Case 3:05-cr-00553-VRW Document 20 Filed 12/22/2005 Page 2 of 2

December 23, 2005

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Judge Vaughn R Walker

Case 3:05-cr-00553-VRW Document 21 Filed 12/23/05 Page 2 of 2