Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca8-02-02856/USCOURTS-ca8-02-02856-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
International Paper Company
Appellant
MCI Worldcom Network Services
Appellee

Document Text:

1

The Honorable Theodore McMillian died on January 18, 2006. This opinion

is filed by the remaining judges of the panel pursuant to Eighth Circuit Rule 47E. 

2

The Honorable Robert T. Dawson, United States District Judge for the Western

District of Arkansas. 

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 02-2856

___________

International Paper Company, *

 *

Appellant, *

 * Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

 * Western District of Arkansas.

MCI WorldCom Network Services, *

Inc., * [PUBLISHED] 

 * 

Appellee. *

 ____________

Submitted: December 15, 2005 

Filed: March 6, 2006

___________

Before COLLOTON, McMILLIAN,1

 and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Pending before this court is a motion by MCI WorldCom Network Services,

Inc. (“MCI”), to dismiss the appeal of International Paper Co. (“IP”) from a judgment

of the District Court for the Western District of Arkansas2

 granting summary judgment

Appellate Case: 02-2856 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/06/2006 Entry ID: 2017119
-2-

in favor of MCI on IP's complaint alleging state law claims of trespass, slander of title,

and unjust enrichment. Int’l Paper Co. v. MCI WorldCom Network Servs., Inc., 202

F. Supp. 2d 895 (W.D. Ark. 2002). While the appeal was pending, MCI filed for

bankruptcy, and the appeal was stayed. After MCI’s reorganization plan was

confirmed, MCI moved to dismiss the appeal on the ground that any claims that IP

may have had were discharged in bankruptcy. We grant MCI’s motion and dismiss

the appeal. 

I.

MCI owns and operates a nation-wide fiber optic cable network that provides

telecommunications services to its customers. Missouri Pacific Railroad (“MoPac”

or “the railroad”) has a right-of-way on land in Arkansas owned by IP. In 1985 and

1987, MCI and MoPac entered into agreements that granted MCI an easement to lay,

maintain and use fiber optic cable within the railroad’s right-of-way. In 1987 and

1988, MCI laid fiber optic cable in the right-of-way, marking the route with

conspicuous posts and signs to indicate the presence of buried cable. Pursuant to the

agreements, MoPac uses a portion of the fiber optic cable for its own

telecommunications purposes. 

In November 2000, IP filed a diversity action in district court, alleging trespass,

slander of title, and unjust enrichment and seeking compensatory and punitive

damages and declaratory and injunctive relief. IP argued that MCI’s installation,

maintenance, and use of the fiber optic cable constituted a trespass because MoPac

lacked the authority to grant MCI an easement to lay, maintain, and use the fiber optic

cable for commercial telecommunications purposes. MCI moved for summary

judgment, asserting that MoPac had the right to grant MCI an easement, and, in any

event, any claims IP may have had were barred by the applicable statute of limitations.

Appellate Case: 02-2856 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/06/2006 Entry ID: 2017119
3

With the confirmation of its reorganization plan, MCI became MCI WorldCom

Communications, Inc.

-3-

In May 2002, the district court granted MCI’s motion for summary judgment.

The district court held that MoPac had the authority to grant MCI an easement. Id. at

903. Alternatively, the district court held that any claims IP may have had accrued in

1987 and 1988 when MCI installed the fiber optic cable and marked its presence with

conspicuous posts and signs, and were thus barred by the two-year statute of

limitations in Arkansas Code Annotated section 23-17-237. Int’l Paper, 202 F. Supp.

2d. at 905.

After IP filed a timely notice of appeal, MCI filed for bankruptcy, and we

stayed the appeal. Effective April 20, 2004, the bankruptcy court confirmed MCI’s

reorganization plan. In re WorldCom, No. 02-13533, 2003 WL 23861928 (Bankr.

S.D.N.Y. Oct. 31, 2003) (unpublished).3

 MCI moves to dismiss the appeal and,

alternatively, argues that the district court correctly granted its motion for summary

judgment.

II.

Under 11 U.S.C. § 1141(d)(1)(A), confirmation of a reorganization plan

“discharges the debtor from any debt that arose before the date of such confirmation.”

“‘Debt’ means liability on a claim,” id. § 101(12), and claim includes “[a] right to

payment, whether or not such right is reduced to judgment, liquidated, unliquidated,

fixed, contingent, matured, unmatured, disputed, undisputed, legal, equitable, secured,

or unsecured.” Id. § 101(5)(A). IP concedes that its claims concerning MCI’s

installation, maintenance, and use of the fiber optic cable before the plan confirmation

date were discharged in bankruptcy, but argues it has post-confirmation claims based

on a continuing trespass theory. 

Appellate Case: 02-2856 Page: 3 Date Filed: 03/06/2006 Entry ID: 2017119
-4-

 MCI argues that IP’s continuing trespass argument is without merit, relying on

In re WorldCom, Inc., 320 B.R. 772 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2005) (WorldCom I), and In re

WorldCom, Inc., 328 B.R. 35 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2005) (WorldCom II). In WorldCom

I, 320 B.R. at 782-83, and WorldCom II, 328 B.R. at 54, the bankruptcy court held

that trespass and unjust enrichment claims concerning MCI’s fiber optic cable buried

in railroad right-of-ways were discharged in bankruptcy. The court rejected

claimants’ arguments that they had post-confirmation claims, concluding that light

signals sent through the cable did not constitute a continuing trespass under the laws

of Kansas, Alabama, and Georgia. MCI also notes that in an unpublished order,

Bockelman v. MCI WorldCom Network Services, Inc., No. 02-2075, Order (8th Cir.

June 1, 2004), this court granted MCI’s motion to dismiss an appeal concerning an

alleged trespass by MCI’s fiber optic cable in a railroad right-of-way, rejecting a

plaintiff’s argument that he had post-confirmation claims under a continuing trespass

theory under Missouri law. 

IP argues that WorldCom I, World Com II and Bockelman are not relevant

because those courts rejected claims of continuing trespass based on the transmission

of light signals through the fiber optic cable, while its continuing trespass claim is

based on MCI’s continued use of an easement that exceeds legal limits, which, IP

asserts, constitutes a continuing trespass under Arkansas law. See Quality Excelsior

Coal Co. v. Reeves, 177 S.W.2d 728, 732-33 (Ark. 1944) (defendant’s unauthorized

use of tunnel at same time as authorized use constituted continuing trespass). IP

argues that although MoPac had the right to grant MCI an easement to use the fiber

optic cable for railroad uses, it did not have the right to grant MCI an easement to use

the cable for commercial telecommunications uses. 

We believe IP’s argument is based on a distinction without a difference. As

MCI notes, if transmission of light signals cannot constitute a trespass under Arkansas

law, then transmission of light signals for a particular purpose cannot constitute a

trespass. We see no reason to believe that Arkansas would recognize a claim for

Appellate Case: 02-2856 Page: 4 Date Filed: 03/06/2006 Entry ID: 2017119
-5-

damages from an intangible trespass of light signals. See W. Page Keeton et al.,

Prosser and Keeton on the Law of Torts § 13, at 71 (5th ed. 1984) (“While it is

generally assumed and held that a personal entry is unnecessary for a trespass, the

defendant’s act must result in an invasion of tangible matter. Otherwise, there would

be no use or interference with possession.” (footnote omitted)); see also Patton v. TPI

Petroleum, Inc., 356 F. Supp. 2d 921, 930 (E.D. Ark. 2005) (describing trespass as a

direct invasion by physical forces). Thus, MCI’s additional use could not constitute

a new or continuing trespass, even if it was beyond the scope of its easement. 

This court has held that when “[u]nder the applicable non-bankruptcy law” a

claim accrued before confirmation, that claim was discharged in bankruptcy.

McSherry v. Trans World Airlines, Inc., 81 F.3d 739, 741 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam).

In the present case, as the district court held, assuming IP had a trespass claim under

Arkansas law, the claim accrued in 1987 and 1988 when MCI installed the fiber optic

cable and marked its route with conspicuous posts and signs that gave MCI notice of

the cable’s presence. Int’l Paper, 202 F. Supp. 2d at 905 (citing Core v. Southwestern

Bell Tel. Co., 847 F.2d 497, 498 (8th Cir. 1988) (per curiam) (finding that a trespass

claim under Arkansas law accrued upon notice of the location of the cable);

Southwestern Bell Tel. Co. v. Poindexter, 433 S.W.2d 833, 835 (Ark. 1968) (holding

cause of action accrued when the telephone company marked presence of cable “by

posting conspicuous signs at intervals along the easement”)). Like the New York

bankruptcy court in the WorldCom cases, we conclude that any trespass claim IP may

have had was therefore discharged in bankruptcy.

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal.

_________________________________

Appellate Case: 02-2856 Page: 5 Date Filed: 03/06/2006 Entry ID: 2017119