Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-16-06468/USCOURTS-ca4-16-06468-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
United States of America
Appellee
Lemoyne Veney
Appellant

Document Text:

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-6468

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

LEMOYNE VENEY, a/k/a Victor Demaris,

 Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge. 

(1:11-cr-00691-RDB-1)

Submitted: June 23, 2016 Decided: June 29, 2016

Before MOTZ, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Lemoyne Veney, Appellant Pro Se. Rod J. Rosenstein, United 

States Attorney, Tamera Lynn Fine, Assistant United States 

Attorney, Paul Nitze, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, 

Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 16-6468 Doc: 11 Filed: 06/29/2016 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Lemoyne Veney seeks to appeal the district court’s order 

denying several motions Veney filed in his pending 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2255 (2012) proceeding. This court may exercise jurisdiction 

only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain 

interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); 

Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 

337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The order Veney seeks to appeal is 

neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or 

collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack 

of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the 

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

DISMISSED

Appeal: 16-6468 Doc: 11 Filed: 06/29/2016 Pg: 2 of 2