Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cr-00745/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cr-00745-4/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Michael J. Fox
Defendant
USA
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[PROP.] ORDER

CR 05 0745 MMC 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

MICHAEL J. FOX,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CR 05 0745 MMC

[PROPOSED] ORDER FINDING

EXCLUDABLE TIME

UNDER SPEEDY TRIAL ACT

18 U.S.C. § 3161(b); (h)(8)(A)&(B)(iv)

The parties appeared before the Court on November 21, 2005. The defendant was

represented by Assistant Federal Public Defender Elizabeth Falk, and the United States

was represented by Assistant United States Attorney Susan Badger. The Court arraigned

Mr. Fox on the information filed on November 18, 2005 in the above-captioned case,

which charges Mr. Fox with one count of mail fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1341.

The defendant requested that the matter be placed on United States District Judge

Chesney’s criminal calendar on December 14, 2005 at 2:30 p.m. and requested that the

Case 3:05-cr-00745-MMC Document 16 Filed 11/23/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[PROP.] ORDER

CR 05 0745 MMC 2

time between November 21, 2005 and December 14, 2005 be excluded from the time

requirements of the Speedy Trial Act. Defense counsel advised the Court that she needs

additional time within which to provide information to the government that is relevant to

possible resolution of the case, and that she will be unavailable for a period of time

between November 21 and December 14 due to trial obligations. Counsel requested that

the time between November 21 and December 14 be excluded for effective preparation

and in order to provide continuity of counsel.

Upon the request of the defendant, to which the government had no objection, and

for good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the time between November

21, 2005 and December 14, 2005 is excluded from the time requirements of the Speedy

Trial Act in order to provide the defendant continuity of counsel and adequate time for

effective preparation, taking into account due diligence. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(A) &

(B)(iv).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

EDWARD CHEN

United States Magistrate Judge

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

Judge Edward M. Chen

Dated: 11/22/05

Case 3:05-cr-00745-MMC Document 16 Filed 11/23/05 Page 2 of 2