Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-01610/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-01610-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Rodolfo Guerrero Alvarez
Petitioner
D. K. Sisto
Respondent

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RODOLFO GUERRERO ALVAREZ, 1:06-CV-1610 AWI WMW HC

Petitioner, ORDER TO SUBMIT NEW 

APPLICATION TO PROCEED

vs. IN FORMA PAUPERIS AND

CERTIFIED COPY OF TRUST

D. K. SISTO, ACCOUNT STATEMENT OR

PAY FILING FEE

Respondent. 

 / 

Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a petition for a writ of habeas

corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 together with an application to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant

to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 and a copy of his prison trust account statement. However, petitioner’s application

to proceed in forma pauperis did not include the required original signature by an authorized officer of

the institution of incarceration. Additionally, the copy of petitioner’s prison trust account statement was

not certified. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2). Petitioner will be provided the opportunity to submit a new

application to proceed in forma pauperis and a certified copy of his trust account statement, or to pay

the $5.00 filing fee.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Clerk’s Office shall send to petitioner the formfor application to proceed in forma

pauperis.

2. Within thirty days of the date of service of this order, petitioner shall submit a

Case 1:06-cv-01610-AWI-WMW Document 8 Filed 12/13/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

completed application to proceed in forma pauperis and a certified copy of his prison trust account

statement for the six month period immediately preceding the filing of the petition, or in the alternative,

pay the $5.00 filing fee for this action. Failure to comply with this order will result in a recommendation

that this action be dismissed.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: December 13, 2006 /s/ William M. Wunderlich 

bl0dc4 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-01610-AWI-WMW Document 8 Filed 12/13/06 Page 2 of 2