Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_16-cv-05544/USCOURTS-cand-4_16-cv-05544-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Atmel Corporation
Counter-claimant
Atmel Corporation U.S. Severance Guarantee Benefit Program
Defendant
William Coplin
Counter-defendant
Microchip Technology Incorporated
Counter-claimant
Peter Schuman
Counter-defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS

4:16-CV-05544-HSG 1

Cliff Palefsky (SBN 77683)

Keith Ehrman (SBN 106985) 

MCGUINN, HILLSMAN & PALEFSKY

535 Pacific Avenue

San Francisco, CA 94133

Telephone: (415) 421-9292 

Facsimile: (415) 403-0202

CP@mhpsf.com

keith@mhpsf.com

Michael Rubin (SBN 80618)

Connie K. Chan (SBN 284230)

Raphael N. Rajendra (SBN 255096)

ALTSHULER BERZON LLP

177 Post Street, Suite 300

San Francisco, CA 94108

Telephone: (415) 421-7151

Facsimile: (415) 362-8064

mrubin@altber.com

cchan@altber.com

rrajendra@altber.com

Attorneys for Plaintiff

Mark G. Kisicki, Esq. (SBN 150057)

OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART

Esplanade Center III, Suite 800

2415 East Camelback Road

Phoenix, AZ 85016

Telephone: (602) 778-3700

Facsimile: (602) 778-3750

Mark.Kisicki@ogletreedeakins.com

Attorney for Defendant

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

PETER SCHUMAN, an individual, and 

WILLIAM COPLIN, an individual, on behalf 

of themselves and on behalf of others similarly 

situated,

Plaintiffs,

v.

MICROCHIP TECHNOLOGY 

INCORPORATED, a corporation; ATMEL 

CORPORATION, a corporation; and ATMEL 

CORPORATION U.S. SEVERANCE 

GUARANTEE BENEFIT PROGRAM, an 

employee benefit plan, 

Defendants.

Case No. 4:16-cv-05544-HSG

CLASS ACTION

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR 

EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO 

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS

Hearing Date: February 9, 2017

Time: 2:00pm

Courtroom: 10

Action Filed: September 29, 2016

Trial Date: None

Case 4:16-cv-05544-HSG Document 21 Filed 11/30/16 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS

4:16-CV-05544-HSG 2

Defendants Microchip Technology Incorporated (“Microchip”), Atmel Corporation 

(“Atmel”), and Atmel Corporation U.S. Severance Guarantee Benefit Program (“Severance 

Program” and, collectively with Microchip and Atmel, “Defendants”) filed their Motion to 

Dismiss Plaintiff’s Class Action Complaint and Motion to Dismiss Defendants Microchip and 

Atmel Corporation U.S. Severance Guarantee Benefit Program as Defendants on November 16, 

2016. Hearing on this motion is scheduled for February 17, 2017, at 2:00pm.

Plaintiffs Peter Schuman and William Coplin (collectively “Plaintiffs”) and Defendants 

have agreed to extend the deadline for Plaintiffs to respond to Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss. 

Plaintiff’s Opposition will be due on December 21, 2016. Defendants’ Reply will be due on 

January 4, 2017.

Dated: November 29, 2016 OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, 

SMOAK, & STEWART, P.C.

Attorneys for Defendants

By: /s/ Mark G. Kisicki

McGUINN, HILLSMAN & PALEFSKY and

ALTSCHULER BERZON LLP

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

By: /s/ Cliff Palefsky

IT IS SO ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff’s Opposition shall be filed no later than December 21, 2016; and

2. Defendant’s Reply shall be filed no later than January 4, 2017.

Dated: November 30, 2016 ___________________________________

JUDGE HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 4:16-cv-05544-HSG Document 21 Filed 11/30/16 Page 2 of 2