Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cr-00375/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cr-00375-8/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Jorge Estrada
Defendant
USA
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING BRIEFING SCHEDULE

CR 06-0375 SI

KEVIN V. RYAN (CSBN 118321)

United States Attorney

MARK L. KROTOSKI (CSBN 138549)

Chief, Criminal Division

ANDREW P. CAPUTO (CSBN 203655)

Assistant United States Attorney

450 Golden Gate Avenue, Box 36055

San Francisco, California 94102-3495

Telephone: (415) 436-7004

FAX: (415) 436-7234

Attorneys for Plaintiff

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

JORGE ESTRADA,

Defendant.

 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CR 06-0375 SI

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]

ORDER CONTINUING BRIEFING

SCHEDULE AND MOTION HEARING

Date: December 1, 2006

Time: 11:00 a.m.

The parties hereby stipulate as follows:

1. Defendant has filed a motion to suppress, which is currently scheduled for hearing

on December 1, 2006, at 11:00 a.m.

2. The government’s opposition to the motion is currently due on November 17.

3. Last Thursday, government counsel learned that one of the three federal agents

present during the events at issue in the motion is currently in Thailand and will not return to

work in the United States until November 20 or 21.

4. To enable government counsel to speak with this currently absent agent before

preparing the government’s opposition to the pending motion, the parties respectfully request that

Case 3:06-cr-00375-SI Document 33 Filed 11/13/2006 Page 1 of 2
 Case 3:06-cr-00375-SI Document 34 Filed 11/14/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING BRIEFING SCHEDULE

CR 06-0375 SI 2

the Court extend the briefing schedule and hearing date on the motion as follows:

Government’s Opposition to Motion: December 1, 2006

Defendant’s Reply on Motion: December 8, 2006

Motion Hearing: December 15, 2006, at 11:00 a.m., or at such

other time convenient for the Court

5. Defendant is currently serving a 24-month sentence on a supervised-release

violation in a related case. As defendant is in custody serving this sentence, he will not be

prejudiced by a delay in these proceedings.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

DATED: November 13, 2006 _______________/s/____________________

ANDREW P. CAPUTO

Assistant United States Attorney

DATED: November 13, 2006 _______________/s/____________________

ELIZABETH M. FALK

Assistant Federal Public Defender

[PROPOSED] ORDER

For good cause shown, the briefing schedule and hearing on defendant’s motion to

suppress are hereby continued as stated in the parties’ stipulation. The hearing on the motion

will be held on _______________________, at 11:00 a.m.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: ____________________ _______________________________________

THE HONORABLE SUSAN ILLSTON

UNITED STATED DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:06-cr-00375-SI Document 33 Filed 11/13/2006 Page 2 of 2

December 15, 2006

Case 3:06-cr-00375-SI Document 34 Filed 11/14/06 Page 2 of 2