Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-05049/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-05049-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Brittany Crittenden
Plaintiff
Starbucks Corporation
Defendant

Document Text:

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE THE FILING OF FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

CASE NO. 16-CV-01306-TEH 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

BURSOR & FISHER, P.A.

L. Timothy Fisher (State Bar No. 191626)

1990 North California Boulevard, Suite 940

Walnut Creek, CA 94596

Telephone: (925) 300-4455

Facsimile: (925) 407-2700

E-Mail: ltfisher@bursor.com

BURSOR & FISHER, P.A.

Scott A. Bursor (State Bar No. 276006)

888 Seventh Avenue

New York, NY 10019

Telephone: (212) 989-9113

Facsimile: (212) 989-9163

E-Mail: scott@bursor.com

MILITARY JUSTICE ATTORNEYS, PLLC

Gerald Healy (admitted pro hac vice)

219 Scott Street, PMB 315

Beaufort, SC 29902

Telephone: (844) 334-5459

Facsimile: (843) 645-6530

E-Mail: gerry@militaryjusticeattorneys.com

MILITARY JUSTICE ATTORNEYS, PLLC

John Hafemann (State Bar No. 238758)

21 W. Park Avenue

Savannah, GA 31401

Telephone: (844) 334-5459

Facsimile: (843) 645-6530

E-Mail: john@militaryjusticeattorneys.com

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

(Additional Counsel Listed on Signature Page)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SIERA STRUMLAUF and BENJAMIN 

ROBLES, individually and on behalf of all 

others similarly situated,

Plaintiffs,

v.

STARBUCKS CORPORATION,

Defendant.

Case No. 16-CV-01306-TEH

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER REGARDING THE FILING OF 

FIRST AMENDED CLASS ACTION 

COMPLAINT

Case 3:16-cv-05049-TEH Document 35 Filed 09/20/16 Page 1 of 5
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE THE FILING OF FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT 1

CASE NO. 16-CV-01306-TEH 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Plaintiffs Siera Strumlauf and Benjamin Robles (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) and Defendant 

Starbucks Corporation (“Starbucks”), by and through their counsel of record, enter into the 

following stipulation, based on the recitals below:

WHEREAS, on March 16, 2016, Plaintiffs filed their initial Class Action Complaint (see 

Dkt. No. 1);

WHEREAS, on May 10, 2016, plaintiff Brittany Crittenden (“Crittenden”) filed her Class 

Action Complaint in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York (see Crittenden 

v. Starbucks Corporation, Case No. 16-cv-03496 (S.D.N.Y.)), which was transferred to this 

District under Case No. 16-cv-05049 and subsequently assigned to this Court; 

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs and Crittenden wish to file a First Amended Class Action Complaint 

that includes Crittenden as a Plaintiff in this case and brings claims under New York General 

Business Law §§ 349, 350 and Florida’s Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act, Fla. Stat. §§ 

501.201, et seq.; 

WHEREAS, counsel for Plaintiffs provided a draft of the proposed First Amended Class 

Action Complaint to counsel for Starbucks to obtain its consent to the filing of the First Amended 

Class Action Complaint, a copy is attached hereto as Exhibit A;

WHEREAS, Starbucks has advised that it does not object to the filing of the proposed First 

Amended Class Action Complaint, in form of Exhibit A hereto. 

WHEREAS, upon the filing of the First Amended Class Action Complaint, Crittenden 

agrees that this Court may dismiss without prejudice the complaint in the action styled as 

Crittenden v. Starbucks Corporation, Case No. 16-cv-05049-TEH (N.D. Cal.);

NOW THEREFORE, the Parties hereby stipulate, subject to Court approval, that Plaintiffs 

shall have leave to file the proposed First Amended Class Action Complaint attached hereto as 

Exhibit A.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Case 3:16-cv-05049-TEH Document 35 Filed 09/20/16 Page 2 of 5
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE THE FILING OF FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT 2

CASE NO. 16-CV-01306-TEH 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Dated: September 16, 2016 Respectfully submitted,

BURSOR & FISHER, P.A.

By: /s/ L. Timothy Fisher 

 L. Timothy Fisher

L. Timothy Fisher (State Bar No. 191626)

1990 North California Boulevard, Suite 940

Walnut Creek, CA 94596

Telephone: (925) 300-4455

Facsimile: (925) 407-2700

E-Mail: ltfisher@bursor.com

BURSOR & FISHER, P.A.

Scott A. Bursor (State Bar No. 276006)

888 Seventh Avenue

New York, NY 10019

Telephone: (212) 989-9113

Facsimile: (212) 989-9163

E-Mail: scott@bursor.com

MILITARY JUSTICE ATTORNEYS, PLLC

Gerald Healy (admitted pro hac vice)

219 Scott Street, PMB 315

Beaufort, SC 29902

Telephone: (844) 334-5459

Facsimile: (843) 645-6530

E-Mail: gerry@militaryjusticeattorneys.com

MILITARY JUSTICE ATTORNEYS, PLLC

John Hafemann (State Bar No. 238758)

21 W. Park Avenue

Savannah, GA 31401

Telephone: (844) 334-5459

Facsimile: (843) 645-6530

E-Mail: john@militaryjusticeattorneys.com

Attorneys for Plaintiffs Strumlauf and Robles

Dated: September 16, 2016 SHEPPARD, MULLIN, RICHTER & HAMPTON 

LLP

By: /s/ Robert J. Guite 

 Robert J. Guite

Robert J. Guite (State Bar No. 244590)

Four Embarcadero Center, 17th Floor

San Francisco, CA 94111-4109

Telephone: (415) 434-9100

Facsimile: (415) 434-3947

Case 3:16-cv-05049-TEH Document 35 Filed 09/20/16 Page 3 of 5
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE THE FILING OF FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT 3

CASE NO. 16-CV-01306-TEH 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

E-Mail: rguite@sheppardmullin.com

SHEPPARD, MULLIN, RICHTER & HAMPTON 

LLP

Fred R. Puglisi (State Bar No. 121822)

Sascha Henry (State Bar No. 191914)

Robin A. Achen (State Bar No. 287033)

333 South Hope Street, 43rd Floor

Los Angeles, CA 90071-1422

Telephone: (213) 620-1780

Facsimile: (213) 620-1398

E-Mail: fpuglisi@sheppardmullin.com

 shenry@sheppardmullin.com

 rachen@sheppardmullin.com

Attorneys for Defendant Starbucks Corporation

ATTESTATION

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1, I, L. Timothy Fisher, attest that all signatories listed, and

on whose behalf the filing is submitted, concur in the stipulation’s content and have authorized the 

stipulation.

/s/ L. Timothy Fisher

 L. Timothy Fisher

Case 3:16-cv-05049-TEH Document 35 Filed 09/20/16 Page 4 of 5
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE THE FILING OF FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT 4

CASE NO. 16-CV-01306-TEH 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED; Case No. 16-cv-05049-TEH 

(N.D. Cal.) is DISMISSED without prejudice and Defendant shall have __ days to respond to the 

First Amended Class Action Complaint.

Dated: __________________, 2016

THELTON E. HENDERSON

United States District Judge

14 9/20

Case 3:16-cv-05049-TEH Document 35 Filed 09/20/16 Page 5 of 5