Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-02724/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-02724-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Fred Figueroa
Respondent
Faraji Lamont Lee
Petitioner

Document Text:

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

FARAJI LAMONT LEE, 

Petitioner, 

v. 

FRED FIGUEROA, 

Respondent. 

No. 2:14-cv-2724 AC P 

ORDER AND FINDINGS & 

RECOMMENDATIONS 

 By order filed May 4, 2015, petitioner was ordered to file an in forma pauperis affidavit or 

to pay the appropriate filing fee, within thirty days, or his application would be dismissed. ECF 

No. 5. The thirty day period has now expired, and petitioner has not responded to the court’s 

order, has not filed an in forma pauperis affidavit, and has not paid the appropriate filing fee. 

 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court randomly assign a United States 

District Judge to this action. 

IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. 

 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 

after being served with these findings and recommendations, petitioner may file written 

objections with the court. Such a document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate 

Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Petitioner is advised that failure to file objections 

Case 2:14-cv-02724-MCE-AC Document 6 Filed 06/17/15 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2

within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. 

Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 

DATED: June 17, 2015 

Case 2:14-cv-02724-MCE-AC Document 6 Filed 06/17/15 Page 2 of 2