Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca5-15-41019/USCOURTS-ca5-15-41019-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Javier Antonie Gradandos
Appellant
United States of America
Appellee

Document Text:

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-41019

Summary Calendar 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee 

v. 

JAVIER ANTONIE GRADANDOS, also known as Javi, also known as Javier 

Antonie Granados, 

Defendant-Appellant 

Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the Eastern District of Texas 

USDC No. 4:13-CR-281-4 

Before JOLLY, SOUTHWICK, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Javier Antonie Gradandos has 

moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. 

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th 

Cir. 2011). Gradandos has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s 

brief and supplemental letter, along with the relevant portions of the record 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

March 24, 2017

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 15-41019 Document: 00513925802 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/24/2017
No. 15-41019

2 

reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal 

presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s 

motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further 

responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

The record reflects a clerical error in the written judgment. Although 

the judgment refers to the offense of conviction as conspiracy to possess with 

intent to manufacture and distribute methamphetamine, the body of the 

indictment and signed factual basis reflect that Gradandos pleaded guilty to 

conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute methamphetamine. 

Accordingly, we REMAND for the limited purpose of correction of the clerical 

error in the written judgment in accordance with Federal Rule of Criminal 

Procedure 36. See United States v. Higgins, 739 F.3d 733, 739 n.16 (5th Cir.

2014); United States v. Rosales, 448 F. App’x 466, 466-67 (5th Cir. 2011). 

 Case: 15-41019 Document: 00513925802 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/24/2017