Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-00874/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-00874-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Bahram Kavousi
Plaintiff
Yolo County Environmental Health Division
Defendant

Document Text:

1

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

CAROLEE G. KILDUFF, ESQ., SBN 107232 

 Email: ckilduff@akk-law.com

CORI R. SARNO, ESQ., SBN 230559 

 Email: csarno@akk-law.com

KRISTIN A. BLOCHER, ESQ., SBN 283730 

 Email: kblocher@akk-law.com

ANGELO, KILDAY & KILDUFF, LLP 

Attorneys at Law 

601 University Avenue, Suite 150 

Sacramento, CA 95825 

Telephone: (916) 564-6100 

Telecopier: (916) 564-6263 

Attorneys for Defendant 

COUNTY OF YOLO erroneously sued as 

YOLO COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL 

HEALTH DIVISION 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

BAHRAM KAVOUSI, 

 Plaintiff, 

 vs. 

YOLO COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL 

HEALTH DIVISION, and DOES 1 through 20, 

inclusive, 

 Defendants. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Case No.: 2:15-cv-00874-JAM-AC 

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S 

MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 

DATE: November 1, 2016 

TIME: 1:30 p.m. 

DEPT.: 6 

Judge John A. Mendez 

 

 Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment came on regularly for hearing on 

November 1, 2016 at 10:30 a.m. in the above-entitled court, the Honorable John A. Mendez 

presiding. 

Cori R. Sarno of Angelo, Kilday & Kilduff LLP appeared on behalf of Defendant and 

moving party. 

Case 2:15-cv-00874-JAM-AC Document 21 Filed 11/09/16 Page 1 of 2
2

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

William F. Wright, Law Offices of William F. Wright appeared on behalf of Plaintiff. 

The matter was fully briefed and argued and submitted to the Court, whereupon the Court 

made the following order, which incorporates by reference the Court’s ruling and comments 

during the Motion for Summary Judgment hearing: 

Each of Defendant’s objections to Plaintiff’s declaration and deposition are well taken. 

The Court sustains each of the objections contained in Defendant’s Objections to Plaintiff’s 

Evidence on the grounds stated therein. 

Based upon the Court’s review of the materials and argument at the hearing, the Court 

grants summary judgment in favor of the County on each of Plaintiff’s claims for age 

discrimination and gender discrimination. Judgment is to be entered in favor of Defendant, the 

County of Yolo, accordingly. 

Dated: 11/9/2016 

 /s/ John A. Mendez______________________ 

 JOHN A. MENDEZ 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 

Approved as to form. 

/s/ William F. Wright 

(as authorized on 11/8/16) 

____________________________ 

Attorney for Plaintiff 

Case 2:15-cv-00874-JAM-AC Document 21 Filed 11/09/16 Page 2 of 2