Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01404/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01404-8/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
R. Samuels
Defendant
Jesse Washington
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Plaintiff Jesse Washington is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action 

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 

This action is proceeding against Defendant R. Samuels for retaliation in violation of the First 

Amendment.

On April 24, 2015, Plaintiff filed a motion to compel discovery. Defendant Samuels filed an 

opposition on May 15, 2015, and Plaintiff filed a reply on May 29, 2015. Although the motion is 

deemed submitted to the Court for review pursuant to Local Rule 230(l), the Court finds that a 

response from Defendant to Plaintiff’s reply, filed May 29, 2015, may be of assistance to resolve 

///

///

///

///

JESSE WASHINGTON,

 Plaintiff,

v.

R. SAMUELS, et al.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: 1:12-cv-01404-AWI-SAB (PC)

ORDER DIRECTING DEFENDANT SAMUELS 

TO FILE A RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF’S REPLY 

WITHIN FIFTEEN DAYS FROM THE DATE OF 

SERVICE OF THIS ORDER

[ECF No. 42]

Case 1:12-cv-01404-SAB Document 43 Filed 06/02/15 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Plaintiff’s pending motion to compel. Accordingly, within fifteen (15) days from the date of service 

of this order, Defendant shall file a response to Plaintiff’s reply, filed May 29, 2015. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 2, 2015 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:12-cv-01404-SAB Document 43 Filed 06/02/15 Page 2 of 2