Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-09-07738/USCOURTS-ca4-09-07738-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Hubert Ramsey
Appellant
United States of America
Appellee

Document Text:

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 09-7738

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff - Appellee, 

 v. 

HUBERT RAMSEY, a/k/a J.R., a/k/a J.R. Ramsey, 

 Defendant - Appellant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Richard L. 

Voorhees, District Judge. (5:96-cr-00005-RLV-4) 

Submitted: January 19, 2010 Decided: January 27, 2010 

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges. 

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Stanford Kent Clontz, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellant. 

Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, 

North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 

Appeal: 09-7738 Doc: 13 Filed: 01/27/2010 Pg: 1 of 2
2 

PER CURIAM: 

 Hubert Ramsey appeals the district court’s order 

denying his motion for a reduction of sentence filed pursuant to 

18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and 

find the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying 

the motion. United States v. Goines, 357 F.3d 469, 478 (4th Cir. 

2004) (motion under § 3582(c) “is subject to the discretion of 

the district court”); United States v. Legree, 205 F.3d 724, 727 

(4th Cir. 2000). Thus, we affirm for the reasons stated by the 

district court. See United States v. Ramsey, No. 5:96-cr-00005-

RLV-4 (W.D.N.C. Sept. 11, 2009). We deny counsel’s motions to 

withdraw as moot and dispense with oral argument because the 

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before the court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process. 

AFFIRMED

Appeal: 09-7738 Doc: 13 Filed: 01/27/2010 Pg: 2 of 2