Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-01559/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-01559-29/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Boeing Company
Counter Claimant
City of Fresno
Counter Defendant
National Guard Bureau
Counter Claimant
United States Army Corps of Engineers
Counter Claimant
United States of America
Counter Claimant

Document Text:

Order re: United States’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on Plaintiff’s Claims Under CERCLA to 

Recover Reimbursed Past Response Costs (Doc. 215)

City of Fresno v. United States of America et al., No. 1:06-cv-01559-OWW-GSA

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Ignacia S. Moreno

Assistant Attorney General

Environment & Natural Resources Division

C. Scott Spear

Kim N. Smaczniak

Paul Cirino

Environmental Defense Section

United States Department of Justice

P.O. Box 23986

Washington, DC 20026-3986

(202) 514-1542 (telephone)

(202) 514-8865 (facsimile)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

THE CITY OF FRESNO,

Plaintiff,

v.

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED 

STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, 

NATIONAL GUARD BUREAU and THE 

BOEING COMPANY, 

 

Defendants.

 No. 1:06-cv-01559-OWW-GSA

ORDER DENYING THE UNITED 

STATES’ MOTION FOR PARTIAL 

SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON 

PLAINTIFF’S CLAIMS UNDER 

CERCLA TO RECOVER 

REIMBURSED PAST RESPONSE 

COSTS (DOC. 215)

Defendants United States of America, United States Army Corps of Engineers, and 

National Guard Bureau (collectively, “United States”) filed a Motion for Partial Summary 

Judgment on Plaintiff’s Claims Under CERCLA to Recover Reimbursed Past Response Costs 

(Doc. 215). The motion came on for hearing on June 14, 2010. All parties were represented by 

counsel at the hearing.

Case 1:06-cv-01559-OWW -GSA Document 318 Filed 06/29/10 Page 1 of 2
Order re: United States’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on Plaintiff’s Claims Under CERCLA to 

Recover Reimbursed Past Response Costs (Doc. 215)

City of Fresno v. United States of America et al., No. 1:06-cv-01559-OWW-GSA

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

After considering all papers filed in connection with the United States’ motion and 

hearing oral argument, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the United 

States’ motion is denied.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 28, 2010 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE DEAC_Signature-END:

emm0d64h

Case 1:06-cv-01559-OWW -GSA Document 318 Filed 06/29/10 Page 2 of 2