Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_08-cv-01285/USCOURTS-caed-1_08-cv-01285-8/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Martinez
Defendant
J. McKesson
Defendant
Tuzon
Defendant
Cesar Uribe
Plaintiff
Zaragosa
Defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

08cv1285 DMS (NLS)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

FRESNO DIVISION

CESAR URIBE,

Plaintiff,

v.

CORRECTIONAL OFFICER J.

McKESSON, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER

MARTINEZ, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER

ZARAGOSA, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER

TUZON, 

Defendants. _____________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 08cv1285 DMS (NLS)

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION FOR LEAVE TO SERVE

ADDITIONAL INTERROGATORIES

AND TO CONDUCT FURTHER

LIMITED DISCOVERY

Plaintiff Cesar Uribe, proceeding in forma pauperis, filed a motion for leave of court to serve

additional interrogatories and to conduct further limited discovery. He says the additional discovery is

necessary to follow up on prior responses to interrogatories, and that interrogatories are the only way he

can pose follow up questions because he does not have the funds to conduct a deposition.

Except for certain court-ordered extensions, discovery closed December 21, 2009. Plaintiff has

not presented good cause to re-open discovery at this late date to follow up on discovery requests he

already served. The court, therefore, DENIES Plaintiff’s motion for additional discovery.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: May 5, 2010

Hon. Nita L. Stormes

U.S. Magistrate Judge

Case 1:08-cv-01285-SMS Document 56 Filed 05/05/10 Page 1 of 1