Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_15-cv-00533/USCOURTS-caed-1_15-cv-00533-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
A.L. Gilbert Company
Defendant
California Sportfishing Protection Alliance
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CALIFORNIA SPORTFISHING 

PROTECTION ALLIANCE, a California 

Non-Profit Corporation, 

Plaintiff,

v.

A.L. GILBERT COMPANY, a California 

Corporation,

Defendants.

_____________________________________/

Case No. 1:15-cv-00533---SKO

ORDER EXTENDING THE TIME FOR 

DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO THE 

COMPLAINT

(Doc. 20)

The Complaint by Plaintiff California Sportfishing Protection Alliance was filed on April 

6, 2015, and served on Defendant A.L. Gilbert Company on July 5, 2015, with an answer due on 

July 27, 2015. (See Docs. 1; 10.) The parties stipulated to a seven day extension of time for 

Defendant to file its response, with an answer due on August 3, 2015. (Doc. 10.) 

On July 20, 2015, Defendant filed notice of its desire not to consent to the jurisdiction of a 

U.S. Magistrate Judge. (Docs. 13; 16.) On July 28, 2015, the parties participated in a Case 

Management Conference, and Defendant requested additional time to reconsider whether it wished 

to consent to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. A further Case Management Conference was set for 

August 10, 2015, to provide Defendant with additional time to decide whether it wished to consent 

to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (Docs. 18; 19.) 

The parties have stipulated to a further seven day extension of time for Defendant to file its 

response to the Complaint, so Defendant can determine whether it will consent to Magistrate 

Case 1:15-cv-00533-DAD-SKO Document 21 Filed 08/04/15 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Judge jurisdiction prior to filing its response to the Complaint. This is the second extension of 

Defendant’s time to respond to the Complaint, for a total extension period of fourteen days. (Doc. 

20.) This extension does not alter the date of any event or any deadline already fixed by Court 

order. (See Doc. 20.) 

The Court has reviewed the parties’ stipulation and, good cause appearing, Defendant shall 

have up to and including August 10, 2015, to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 4, 2015 /s/ Sheila K. Oberto 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:15-cv-00533-DAD-SKO Document 21 Filed 08/04/15 Page 2 of 2