Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_10-cv-00858/USCOURTS-caed-2_10-cv-00858-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Richard M. Estrada
Plaintiff
A. Hedgpeth
Defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RICHARD M. ESTRADA,

Petitioner, No. 2: 10-cv-0858 JAM KJN P

vs.

A. HEDGPETH, 

Respondent. ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

 /

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel with an application for

writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On June 7, 2010, respondent filed a motion

to dismiss. Petitioner has not filed an opposition to the motion. Local Rule 230(l) provides in

part: “Failure of the responding party to file written opposition or to file a statement of no

opposition may be deemed a waiver of any opposition to the granting of the motion . . . .” 

Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner show cause,

within twenty-one days, why his failure to oppose respondent’s June 7, 2010 motion to dismiss

should not deemed a waiver of any opposition to the granting of the motion. Petitioner is

////

////

////

Case 2:10-cv-00858-JAM-KJN Document 18 Filed 07/29/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

cautioned that failure to respond to the instant order, or to file an opposition to the pending

motion to dismiss, will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed.

DATED: July 28, 2010

_____________________________________

KENDALL J. NEWMAN

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

 

es858.osc

Case 2:10-cv-00858-JAM-KJN Document 18 Filed 07/29/10 Page 2 of 2