Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_13-cv-01632/USCOURTS-caed-2_13-cv-01632-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Robert Benyamini
Plaintiff
T. Minton
Defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ROBERT BENYAMINI,

Plaintiff,

v.

T. MINTON,

Defendant.

No. 2:13-cv-01632 JAM DAD P

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

On April 2, 2014 plaintiff was ordered to file an in forma pauperis affidavit by a nonprisoner or pay the appropriate filing fees within thirty days and was cautioned that failure to do 

so would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. That thirty day period has 

now expired, and plaintiff has not complied with the court’s order and has not filed an in forma 

pauperis affidavit or paid the appropriate filing fee.

1

 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 

RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice.

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 

after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written 

 

1

In the court’s April 2, 2014 order, the court also dismissed plaintiff's complaint and granted him 

leave to file an amended complaint within thirty days. On April 16, 2014, plaintiff filed his 

amended complaint but failed to fully comply with the court’s order by either filing an in forma 

pauperis affidavit or paying the appropriate filing fee.

Case 2:13-cv-01632-JAM-AC Document 8 Filed 05/13/14 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned 

“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Any response to the 

objections shall be filed and served within fourteen days after service of the objections. The 

parties are advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to 

appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

Dated: May 12, 2014

DAD:4

beny1632.fifp

Case 2:13-cv-01632-JAM-AC Document 8 Filed 05/13/14 Page 2 of 2