Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-01162/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-01162-3/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Robert Horel
Respondent
Michael Jerome Mullins
Petitioner

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MICHAEL JEROME MULLINS, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

)

v. )

)

)

WARDEN ROBERT HOREL, )

)

Respondent. )

 )

1:07-cv-01162-AWI-TAG HC

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATION

(Doc. 15)

ORDER DISMISSING PETITION FOR WRIT

OF HABEAS CORPUS

(Doc. 1)

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO

ENTER JUDGMENT

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. 

On February 28, 2008, Respondent filed a motion to dismiss the petition as successive and

untimely. (Doc. 9). On August 7, 2008, the Magistrate Judge assigned to the case filed a Findings

and Recommendations recommending that the motion to dismiss be granted and that the petition for

writ of habeas corpus be DISMISSED as successive and untimely. (Doc. 15). The Findings and

Recommendations was served on all parties and contained notice that any objections were to be filed

within fifteen days from the date of service of that order. 

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a de

novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court concludes that the

Case 1:07-cv-01162-AWI-TAG Document 16 Filed 09/12/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation is supported by the record and proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendation issued August 7, 2008 (Doc. 15), is ADOPTED IN

FULL; 

2. Respondent's motion to dismiss (Doc. 9), is GRANTED;

3. The petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. 1) is DISMISSED; and

4. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to ENTER JUDGMENT for Respondent and close the

file.

This order terminates the action in its entirety.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 11, 2008 /s/ Anthony W. Ishii 

9h0d30 CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:07-cv-01162-AWI-TAG Document 16 Filed 09/12/08 Page 2 of 2