Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-15-02206/USCOURTS-ca4-15-02206-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Jamaal Gittens
Appellant
State of South Carolina
Appellee

Document Text:

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-2206

JAMAAL GITTENS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA,

Defendant - Appellee.

No. 15-2294

JAMAAL GITTENS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Columbia and Greenville. Mary G. Lewis, 

District Judge. (3:15-cv-02841-MGL; 6:15-cv-03108-MGL)

Submitted: February 25, 2016 Decided: February 29, 2016

Before SHEDD and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit 

Judge.

Appeal: 15-2206 Doc: 8 Filed: 02/29/2016 Pg: 1 of 3
2

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jamaal Gittens, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 15-2206 Doc: 8 Filed: 02/29/2016 Pg: 2 of 3
3

PER CURIAM:

Jamaal Gittens appeals the district court’s orders accepting 

the recommendations of the magistrate judge and denying relief on 

his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaints. We have reviewed the 

records and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for 

the reasons stated by the district court. Gittens v. South 

Carolina, No. 3:15-cv-02841-MGL (D.S.C. Sept. 30, 2015); Gittens 

v. South Carolina, No. 6:15-cv-03108-MGL (D.S.C. Oct. 8, 2015). 

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Appeal: 15-2206 Doc: 8 Filed: 02/29/2016 Pg: 3 of 3