Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-00023/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-00023-3/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Matson Navigation Company
Defendant
Jesus Pilare
Plaintiff

Document Text:

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JESUS PILARE,

Plaintiff, 

 v.

MATSON NAVIGATION COMPANY,

and DOES ONE through TEN, inclusive,

Defendant. /

No. C 06-00023 WHA

REMINDER NOTICE OF

UPCOMING TRIAL AND FINAL

PRETRIAL CONFERENCE

This notice serves as a friendly reminder that this case remains set for a FINAL

PRETRIAL CONFERENCE on FEBRUARY 2, 2007, at 2:00 P.M., with a JURY TRIAL on

FEBRUARY 26, 2007. Please consult the existing case management order and review and

follow all standing guidelines and orders of the undersigned for civil cases on the Court’s

website at http://www.cand.uscourts.gov. Continuances will rarely be granted. 

The final pretrial conference will be an important event, for it will be there that the

shape of the upcoming trial will be determined, including in limine orders, time limits and

exhibit mechanics. Lead trial counsel must attend. 

To avoid any misunderstanding with respect to the final pretrial conference and trial,

the Court wishes to emphasize that all filings and appearances must be made — on pain of

dismissal, default or other sanction — unless and until a dismissal fully resolving the case is

received. It will not be enough to inform the clerk that a settlement in principle has been

Case 3:06-cv-00023-WHA Document 36 Filed 12/08/06 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

reached or to lodge a partially executed settlement agreement or to lodge a fully executed

agreement (or dismissal) that resolves less than the entire case. Where, however, a

fully-executed and unconditional settlement agreement clearly and fully disposing of the entire

case is lodged reasonably in advance of the pretrial conference or trial and only a ministerial

act remains, the Court will arrange a telephone conference to work out an alternate procedure

pending a formal dismissal. 

In order to evaluate whether the Court can be of further ADR assistance, please file a

joint report within fourteen days of service of this order describing the progress and status of

your ADR efforts to date and any further ADR recommendations by the parties. 

In this case, the Court wishes to consider the following additional trial procedures and

desires that counsel meet and confer and reach a stipulation concerning whether and how to

use them: 

1. Scheduling opposing experts so as to appear in successive order; 

2. Giving preliminary instructions on the law; 

3. Allowing limited pre-closing deliberations (as per, e.g., Rule 39

of the Arizona Rules of Civil Procedure); and 

4. Allowing each side fifteen minutes of opening/argument time to

be used during the evidence time (in addition to normal opening statement and

closing argument). 

Please present the results of your stipulation (or not) in the joint pretrial conference

submissions. 

Dated: December 8, 2006. 

WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:06-cv-00023-WHA Document 36 Filed 12/08/06 Page 2 of 2