Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_09-cv-02304/USCOURTS-caed-2_09-cv-02304-9/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Interactive Intelligence, Inc.
Defendant
Mujeeb Puzhakkaraillath
Defendant
Mohit Randhawa
Plaintiff
Shannon CallNet Pvt Ltd
Plaintiff
Harpal Singh
Plaintiff
Skylux Telelink PVT LTD
Defendant
Skylux, Inc.
Defendant

Document Text:

_____________________________________________________________________________ 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND DEFENDANTS’ DEADLINE TO FILE 

RESPONSES TO SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT 

-1- 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

Gregg A. Rapoport (SBN 136941) 

BUSINESS LEGAL PARTNERS, ATTORNEYS AT LAW, LAW CORP. 135 W. Green Street, Suite 100 

Pasadena, CA 91105 

Direct Tel. 626-585-0155 Fax. 626-578-1827 

grapoport@bizlegalpartners.com

Attorney for Defendants 

SKYLUX INC., INTERACTIVE INTELLIGENCE, INC., 

and MUJEEB PUZHAKKARAILLATH 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – SACRAMENTO DIVISION 

MOHIT RANDHAWA aka HARPAL 

SINGH, and SHANNON CALLNET 

PVT LTD, 

 Plaintiffs, 

v. 

SKYLUX INC., INTERACTIVE 

INTELLIGENCE, INC., MUJEEB 

PUZHAKKARAILLATH, SKYLUX 

TELELINK PVT LTD; and DOES 1 

through 

20, inclusive. 

 Defendants. 

 Case No.: 2:09-CV-02304-WBS-DAD 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER TO EXTEND 

DEFENDANTS’ DEADLINE TO 

FILE RESPONSES TO SECOND 

AMENDED COMPLAINT

 WHEREAS: 

1. Plaintiffs Mohit Randhawa and Shannon Callnet Pvt Ltd. 

(“Plaintiffs”) filed a Second Amended Complaint on January 6, 2010, 

following orders by the Court on November 3, 2009 (Docket No. 27), 

Case 2:09-cv-02304-WBS-KJN Document 49 Filed 01/15/10 Page 1 of 4
_____________________________________________________________________________ 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND DEFENDANTS’ DEADLINE TO FILE 

RESPONSES TO SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT 

-2- 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

on December 2, 2009 (Docket No. 36), and on December 21, 2009 

(Docket No. 37); 

2. In the Second Amended Complaint, Plaintiffs have added a new 

Defendant, SKYLUX TELELINK PVT LTD. (“STPL”). 

3. STPL is represented in this action by Gregg A. Rapoport, who is 

counsel of record for Defendants SKYLUX INC. (“Skylux”) and 

MUJEEB PUZHAKKARAILLATH (“Puzhakkaraillath”), as well as 

co-counsel for Defendant INTERACTIVE INTELLIGENCE, INC. 

4. Mr. Rapoport has agreed to accept service and acknowledge receipt of 

the Summons and Second Amended Complaint on behalf of STPL, 

when provided by Plaintiffs. 

5. The current deadline for Defendants Skylux and Puzhakkaraillath to 

respond to the Second Amended Complaint is January 20, 2010 (14 

days after its filing, pursuant to Rule 15(a), Fed. R. Civ. P. 

6. Defendants’ counsel have requested a seven (7) day extension of time 

within which to file responses to the Second Amended Complaint, 

and anticipate that responses by all Defendants will be filed at that 

time. This request is made in part due to Mr. Rapoport’s required 

jury service during the week of January 18th. 

7. Plaintiffs’ counsel has agreed to this request. 

/ / / 

/ / / 

/ / / 

Case 2:09-cv-02304-WBS-KJN Document 49 Filed 01/15/10 Page 2 of 4
_____________________________________________________________________________ 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND DEFENDANTS’ DEADLINE TO FILE 

RESPONSES TO SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT 

-3- 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

NOW THEREFORE, the parties, through their counsel of record herein, 

now STIPULATE AND AGREE to the following: 

The time within which Defendants shall respond to the Second Amended 

Complaint shall be extended by seven (7) calendar days. 

DATED: January __, 2010 BUSINESS LEGAL PARTNERS 

 

 /s/ 

GREGG A. RAPOPORT 

Attorneys for Defendants 

INTERACTIVE INTELLIGENCE, INC 

SKYLUX, INC., MUJEEB 

PUZHAKKARAILLATH and SKYLUX 

TELELINK PVT LTD 

DATED: January 14, 2010 OVERHAUSER & LINDMAN, LLC 

 /s/ 

CONSTANCE LINDMAN 

Attorneys for Defendant 

 INTERACTIVE INTELLIGENCE, INC 

DATED: January 13, 2010 THE LAW OFFICE OF JAY IAN 

 ABOUDI 

 /s/ 

JAY ABOUDI 

Attorney for Plaintiffs 

MOHIT RANDHAWA aka HARPAL 

SINGH and SHANNON CALLNET PVT 

LTD 

Case 2:09-cv-02304-WBS-KJN Document 49 Filed 01/15/10 Page 3 of 4
_____________________________________________________________________________ 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND DEFENDANTS’ DEADLINE TO FILE 

RESPONSES TO SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT 

-4- 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

ORDER

Based on the stipulation entered by the parties, IT IS ORDERED THAT 

The time within which Defendants shall respond to the Second Amended 

Complaint shall be extended by seven (7) calendar days. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: January 14, 2010 

Case 2:09-cv-02304-WBS-KJN Document 49 Filed 01/15/10 Page 4 of 4