Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-01185/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-01185-4/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Jose Miguel Padilla
Petitioner
Jeff Wrigley
Respondent

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOSE MIGUEL PADILLA, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

v. )

)

JEFF WRIGLEY, )

)

Respondent. )

 )

1:06-cv-01185-OWW-SMS-HC

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS (Doc. 8)

ORDER GRANTING PETITION

FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

ORDER THAT RESPONDENT

CONSIDER THE APPROPRIATENESS

OF TRANSFERRING PETITIONER

Petitioner is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se with a

Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. 

On November 13, 2006, the Magistrate Judge filed Findings and

Recommendations that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus be

GRANTED, and Respondent be ORDERED to consider the appropriateness

of transferring Petitioner to an RRC in light of the factors set

forth in § 3621(b), not excluding any other factors deemed

appropriate by the BOP, without reference to the BOP policy

promulgated in December 2002, and without reference to the BOP's

February 14, 2005, amendment to 28 C.F.R. § 570.21. These Findings

and Recommendations were served on all parties and contained notice

Case 1:06-cv-01185-LJO -SMS Document 10 Filed 01/19/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

that any objections were to be filed within ten (10) days from the

date of service of that order. On November 21, 2006, Respondent

filed objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and

Recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636

(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a de novo review of the case. 

Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court concludes that

the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations are supported

by the record and proper analysis. Respondent's objections present

no grounds for questioning the Magistrate Judge's analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed November 13, 2006,

are ADOPTED IN FULL;

2. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is GRANTED; and,

3. Respondent consider the appropriateness of transferring

Petitioner to an RRC in light of the factors set forth in §

3621(b), not excluding any other factors deemed appropriate by the

BOP, without reference to the BOP policy promulgated in December

2002, and without reference to the BOP's February 14, 2005,

amendment to 28 C.F.R. § 570.21. Given that Petitioner's

projected release is May 8, 2008, with a current date of February

1, 2008, for release to a Residential Re-entry Center, Respondent

is ordered to make this determination on or before March 31, 2007. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 18, 2007 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger 

emm0d6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-01185-LJO -SMS Document 10 Filed 01/19/07 Page 2 of 2