Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_06-cv-00208/USCOURTS-azd-2_06-cv-00208-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Phillip Crawford
Respondent
Dedo Omanovic
Petitioner

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Dedo Omanovic,

Petitioner, 

vs.

Phillip Crawford, 

Respondent. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CV 06-0208-PHX

ORDER

On January 17, 2006 Petitioner filed a Petition For Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant

to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Doc. #1). On July 18, 2006 Magistrate Judge Aspey issued a Report

and Recommendation ("R&R") recommending that the Petition be denied (Doc. #17). No

objections were filed by either party.

The Court "may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or

recommendations made by the magistrate judge." 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). It is "clear that the

district judge must review the magistrate judge's findings and recommendations de novo if

objection is made, but not otherwise." United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121

(9th Cir. 2003) (en banc) (emphasis in original); Schmidt v. Johnstone, 263 F. Supp. 2d 1219,

1126 (D. Ariz. 2003) ("Following Reyna-Tapia, this Court concludes that de novo review of

factual and legal issues is required if objections are made, 'but not otherwise."'). District

courts are not required to conduct "any review at all . . . of any issue that is not the subject

Case 2:06-cv-00208-ROS Document 18 Filed 08/07/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

of an objection." Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985). No objection having been

made, the Court will adopt the R&R in full. 

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (Doc. #17) is ADOPTED

and that the Petition For Writ of Habeas Corpus be DENIED (Doc. #1) and the matter

closed.

DATED this 7th day of August, 2006.

Case 2:06-cv-00208-ROS Document 18 Filed 08/07/06 Page 2 of 2