Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-04680/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-04680-2/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
A. P. Kane
Respondent
Edward Victor Tayag
Petitioner

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

EDWARD VICTOR TAYAG,

Petitioner,

 vs.

A. P. KANE, Acting Warden,

Respondent. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. C 05-4680 CRB (PR)

ORDER

(Doc # 12)

On March 30, 2007, the court denied petitioner's application for a writ of

habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 and the clerk entered judgment in favor of

respondent. Petitioner promptly filed a "motion in objection to magistrate judge's

report and recommendation."

To whatever extent petitioner's motion (doc # 12) may be construed as a

motion for reconsideration, it is DENIED. See Twentieth Century - Fox Film

Corp. v. Dunnahoo, 637 F.2d 1338, 1341 (9th Cir. 1981) (motions for

reconsideration are not a substitute for appeal or a means of attacking some

perceived error of the court). 

SO ORDERED.

DATED: May 16, 2007 CHARLES R. BREYER

United States District Judge

Case 3:05-cv-04680-CRB Document 13 Filed 05/17/07 Page 1 of 1