Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-almd-3_14-cv-01051/USCOURTS-almd-3_14-cv-01051-3/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
AL & Sons Corp.
Defendant
Colony Insurance Company
Plaintiff
Al Mitchell
Defendant

Document Text:

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA 

EASTERN DIVISION 

COLONY INSURANCE COMPANY, ) 

as subrogee for Regeneration, LLC and ) 

Roy Granger, ) 

 ) 

Plaintiff, ) 

) 

v. ) CASE NO. 3:14-cv-1051-WHA-TFM 

) 

AL & SONS CORP. and ) (WO) 

AL MITCHELL, ) 

) 

Defendants. ) 

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER 

This cause is before the court on the Plaintiff’s Objection to Defendants’ Witness List 

(Doc. #36). The Plaintiff objects to witnesses on the Defendants’ list as follows: Witness 4. 

Robert Meadows, Witness 12. Gene Calhoun, and Witnesses 13, 14, 15, and 15 which are 

witnesses who have not been specifically identified. 

 In response to the objection to Robert Meadows, Defense counsel states that he has 

decided not to call Robert Meadows, so that that objection is moot. 

The Plaintiff objects as to Gene Calhoun on the ground that his testimony will not aid the 

jury because the value of the property pre and post-fire is not relevant. The Plaintiff also states 

that Gene Calhoun was not identified as an expert witness. 

In response Defense counsel states that Gene Calhoun will not be called as a witness. 

Defense counsel states that the documents submitted by Gene Calhoun to Colony Insurance and 

made a part of Colony Insurance’s business records will be offered as evidence. These exhibits 

will be discussed in a separate Order on the Plaintiff’s Objections to the Defendants’ List of 

Exhibits. 

Case 3:14-cv-01051-WHA-TFM Document 55 Filed 10/27/15 Page 1 of 2
Exhibit 13 is a designation for a representative of Colony Insurance Company. The 

Defendant states that Pete DeJesso has been listed as a witness and will serve as a trial 

representative for the Plaintiff, so the Defendants do not anticipate calling any additional 

witnesses from Colony Insurance Company. Defense counsel also states that as to Witnesses 

14, 15, and 16, it does not anticipate calling any other witnesses and only reserves the right to 

call witnesses for rebuttal or impeachment. 

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that the Plaintiff’s Objections as to Defendants’ 

Witnesses 4 and 12 are OVERRULED as moot, and are SUSTAINED as to Witnesses 13, 14, 

15, and 16. Defendants will be permitted to present rebuttal evidence in accordance with the 

Federal Rules of Evidence and Civil Procedure. 

Done this 27th day of October, 2015. 

 /s/ W. Harold Albritton_____________________ 

 W. HAROLD ALBRITTON 

 SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 3:14-cv-01051-WHA-TFM Document 55 Filed 10/27/15 Page 2 of 2