Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-00576/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-00576-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Citibank Card
Defendant
Citibank West
Defendant
Citicorp Credit Services, Inc
Defendant
Citigroup
Defendant
Ronald B. McNearney
Plaintiff

Document Text:

STROOCK & STROOCK & LAVAN LLP

JULIA B. STRICKLAND (State Bar No. 083013)

ANDREW W. MORITZ (State Bar No. 191889)

A. R. KACHADOORIAN (State Bar No. 240601)

2029 Century Park East, Suite 1800

Los Angeles, California 90067-3086

Telephone: 310-556-5800

Facsimile: 310-556-5959

lacalendar@stroock.com

Attorneys for Defendants

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RONALD B. MCNEARNEY

Plaintiff,

vs.

CITICORP CREDIT SERVICES, INC. dba

CITIBANK WEST, CITIBANK CARD,

CITIGROUP and DOES 1-100, inclusive,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 2:06-cv-0576-WBS-PAN (GGH) PS

 STIPULATION AND ORDER

CONTINUING HEARING DATE ON

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS 

 TO JULY 20, 2006

STIPULATION

WHEREAS, this action was removed to the above-captioned Court on March

17, 2006;

WHEREAS, pursuant to a prior stipulation of the parties, Defendants’ time to

respond to the Complaint was extended to and including April 7, 2006; 

WHEREAS, Defendants timely filed a Motion to Dimiss Plaintiff’s

Complaint (the “Motion”) and accompanying Memorandum of Points and Authorities on

April 7, 2006; 

WHEREAS, a hearing on Defendants’ Motion currently is scheduled to occur

on June 1, 2006; 

Case 2:06-cv-00576-WBS-EFB Document 15 Filed 05/26/06 Page 1 of 3
WHEREAS, plaintiff Ronald B. McNearney (“Plaintiff”) is unable to appear

at the June 1, 2006 hearing on the Motion;

WHEREAS, the next available date following June 1, 2006 on which the

Motion may be heard and on which both parties will be able to appear is July 20, 2006;

WHEREAS, the parties have agreed to continue the hearing on the Motion

from June 1, 2006 to July 20, 2006; and

WHEREAS, this Stipulation is made in good faith, without purposes of delay

and good cause exists for the continuance because Plaintiff is unavailable to appear at the

June 1, 2006 hearing on the Motion, and a short continuance of this date is necessary to

enable both parties to be present at the hearing on the Motion.

NOW, THEREFORE, PLAINTIFF AND DEFENDANTS, BY AND THROUGH

THEIR COUNSEL, HEREBY STIPULATE that:

1. The hearing on Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss shall be continued from June

1, 2006 to and including July 20, 2006, at 11:00 a.m., or such other time as is convenient for

the Court. 

2. The time for filing Opposition and Reply papers will proceed in the manner

set forth in Civil Local Rule 78-230 and shall be based upon the new hearing date, July 20,

2006.

Dated: May ___, 2006 STROOCK & STROOCK & LAVAN LLP

By: __________/s/__________________

Andrew W. Moritz 

Attorneys for Defendants

Dated: May ___, 2006 RONALD B. McNEARNEY

By: _________/s/____________________

Ronald B. McNearney 

In Pro Per 

Case 2:06-cv-00576-WBS-EFB Document 15 Filed 05/26/06 Page 2 of 3
ORDER

The hearing on defendants’ motion to dismiss, presently scheduled for June 1, 2006,

before Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds, is vacated and rescheduled as set forth below,

pursuant to the reassignment of this case to the undersigned magistrate judge. Defendant’s

motion to dismiss filed April 7, 2006, is hereby rescheduled for hearing before the

undersigned on Thursday, July 20, 2006 at 10:00 a.m., in Courtroom #24.

DATED: 5/26/06 /s/ Gregory G. Hollows

_________________________________

The Honorable Gregory G. Hollows

United States Magistrate Judge

NOW6: MCNEARNEY.Stip re Sched

Case 2:06-cv-00576-WBS-EFB Document 15 Filed 05/26/06 Page 3 of 3