Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_23-cv-01351/USCOURTS-caed-1_23-cv-01351-4/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Jose Arellano-Cigfuego
Petitioner
Warden
Respondent

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOSE ARELLANO-CIGFUEGO,

Petitioner,

v.

WARDEN,

Respondent.

Case No. 1:23-cv-01351-WBS-SAB-HC

ORDER SEALING DOCUMENTS AS SET 

FORTH IN GOVERNMENT’S NOTICE

(ECF No. 20)

ORDER DIRECTING RESPONDENT TO 

COMPLY WITH LOCAL RULE 141(e)(2)(i) 

WITHIN TWO DAYS FROM THE DATE 

OF SERVICE OF ORDER

Pursuant to Local Rule 141(b), and based on the representations contained in the 

Respondent’s Request to Seal, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Respondent’s Exhibit 1 to its 

Notice of Filing Removal Order, pertaining to Jose Arellano-Cigfuego, and Respondent’s

Request to Seal shall be SEALED until further order of this Court. 

It is FURTHER ORDERED that electronic access to the sealed documents shall be 

limited to Respondent and counsel for Petitioner.

The Court has considered the factors set forth in Oregonian Publishing Co. v. U.S. 

District Court for the District of Oregon, 920 F.2d 1462 (9th Cir. 1990). The Court finds that, for 

the reasons stated in Respondent’s Request, sealing Respondent’s Request and Exhibit 1 serves a 

compelling interest. The Court further finds that, in the absence of closure, the compelling 

interests identified by Respondent would be harmed. In light of the public filing of its Notice to 

Case 1:23-cv-01351-WBS-SAB Document 21 Filed 07/24/24 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Seal, the Court further finds that there are no additional alternatives to sealing Respondent’s 

Request and Exhibit 1 that would adequately protect the compelling interests identified by the

Government.

Respondent is DIRECTED to comply with Local Rule 141(e)(2)(i)1 within two days from 

the date of service of this order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 24, 2024 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

1

“If the requesting party is authorized to file electronically, then counsel for the requesting party shall either e-mail 

to the Clerk, at the e-mail address for sealed documents listed on the Court’s website, an electronic copy of the 

documents covered by the sealing order, in .pdf format as an attachment, or submit to the Clerk by hand-delivery, 

U.S. mail, or same-day or overnight courier, a CD containing a copy of the documents in .pdf format.” L.R. 141 

(e)(2)(i).

Case 1:23-cv-01351-WBS-SAB Document 21 Filed 07/24/24 Page 2 of 2