Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01962/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01962-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Lori Bryan
Defendant
Mark Linn Bryan
Counter Claimant
Central Mortgage Company
Defendant
Chase Manhattan Bank USA, N.A.
Defendant
Citibank South Dakota, N.A.
Defendant
Phonxay Keokham
Defendant
Lori Martin
Defendant
Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc.
Defendant
State of California Franchise Tax Board
Defendant
United States of America
Counter Defendant

Document Text:

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 

Order 1 

DAVID A. HUBBERT 

Deputy Assistant Attorney General 

CONNOR J. PESTOVICH (NM Bar 159189) 

Trial Attorney, Tax Division 

U.S. Department of Justice 

P.O. Box 683 

Washington, D.C. 20044 

Phone: 202-616-2378 

Fax: 202-307-0054 

Connor.Pestovich@usdoj.gov 

Attorney for the United States of America 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

MARK LINN BRYAN; LORI BRYAN, 

a/k/a LORI MARTIN, individually and as 

trustee of the LORI M. BRYAN 

SEPARATE PROPERTY REVOCABLE 

TRUST; CENTRAL MORTGAGE 

COMPANY; MORTGAGE 

ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION 

SYSTEMS, INC.; STATE OF 

CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TAX 

BOARD; PHONXAY KEOKHAM, San 

Joaquin County Treasurer-Tax Collector; 

CITIBANK SOUTH DAKOTA, N.A.; 

CHASE MANHATTAN BANK USA, 

N.A., 

Defendants. 

No. 2:22-cv-01962-KJM-AC 

ORDER APPROVING LIEN PRIORITY 

STIPULATION BETWEEN UNITED STATES 

AND SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY 

Plaintiff, the United States of America, and Defendant Phonxay Keokham, San Joaquin 

County Treasurer-Tax Collector (“San Joaquin County”), have jointly filed a Lien Priority 

Stipulation between the United States and San Joaquin County (ECF No. 37) (“Stipulation”) with 

regard to the real property at issue in this action (“Subject Property”). 

Case 2:22-cv-01962-DJC-AC Document 40 Filed 02/07/23 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 

Order 2 

In consideration of the Parties’ Stipulation and for good cause shown, the Court 

ORDERS: 

(1) The Stipulation between the Untied States and San Joaquin County is hereby 

approved; 

(2) If the Court permits the sale of the Subject Property, the United States shall submit 

to the Court a proposed order of sale consistent with the Stipulation; 

(3) San Joaquin County agrees to be bound by the judgment in this case, which shall 

incorporate the terms of the Stipulation; 

(4) The United States and San Joaquin County shall each bear their own costs and 

attorney’s fees, except the costs incurred in selling the Subject Property, which are to be 

reimbursed from the proceeds of the sale of the Subject Property prior to satisfying the 

outstanding liens on the Subject Property; and 

(5) San Joaquin County is excused from further participation in this action, including 

discovery, until, and if, the Court permits the sale of the Subject Property, unless the Court orders 

otherwise. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: February 6, 2023. 

Case 2:22-cv-01962-DJC-AC Document 40 Filed 02/07/23 Page 2 of 2