Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-07-07476/USCOURTS-ca4-07-07476-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Henry Dargan McMaster
Appellee
Jon Ozmint
Appellee
Anthony Padula
Appellee
Donald L. Stewart
Appellant

Document Text:

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-7476

DONALD L. STEWART,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

JON OZMINT, Director, South Carolina Department of

Corrections; ANTHONY PADULA, Warden, Lee Correctional

Institution; HENRY DARGAN MCMASTER, Attorney General of the

State of South Carolina,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Columbia. Terry L. Wooten, District Judge.

(3:06-cv-3043-TLW)

Submitted: July 16, 2008 Decided: August 6, 2008

Before SHEDD and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Donald L. Stewart, Appellant Pro Se. William Edgar Salter, III,

Assistant Attorney General, Donald John Zelenka, Deputy Assistant

Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 07-7476 Doc: 13 Filed: 08/06/2008 Pg: 1 of 2
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Donald L. Stewart seeks to appeal the district court’s

order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and

denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition. The order

is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a

certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A

certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial

showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C.

§ 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any

assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is

debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by

the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell,

537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484

(2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have

independently reviewed the record and conclude that Stewart has not

made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Appeal: 07-7476 Doc: 13 Filed: 08/06/2008 Pg: 2 of 2