Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-15-07258/USCOURTS-ca4-15-07258-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Harold W. Clarke
Appellee
Jeffrey A. Pleasant
Appellant

Document Text:

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-7258

JEFFREY A. PLEASANT,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior

District Judge. (3:14-cv-00783-REP-RCY)

Submitted: January 19, 2016 Decided: February 5, 2016

Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jeffrey A. Pleasant, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 15-7258 Doc: 11 Filed: 02/05/2016 Pg: 1 of 3
2

PER CURIAM:

Jeffrey A. Pleasant seeks to appeal the district court’s 

orders denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition

and denying his motion for reconsideration. The orders are not 

appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a 

certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A) (2012). 

A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a 

substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 

28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies 

relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by 

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the 

district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is 

debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 

(2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). 

When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the 

prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural 

ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable 

claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. 

at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that 

Pleasant has not made the requisite showing. Pleasant is in 

custody pursuant to a judgment of the Circuit Court for 

Chesterfield County, Virginia; he is not being detained pending 

a City of Richmond charge dating back to 2000, contrary to his 

Appeal: 15-7258 Doc: 11 Filed: 02/05/2016 Pg: 2 of 3
3

assertions in this case. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of 

appealability, deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and 

dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the 

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

DISMISSED

Appeal: 15-7258 Doc: 11 Filed: 02/05/2016 Pg: 3 of 3