Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_16-cv-01047/USCOURTS-caed-2_16-cv-01047-2/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Tomery Darling
Defendant
Michael Powell
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MICHAEL POWELL,

Plaintiff,

v.

TOMERY DARLING,

Defendant.

No. 2:16-cv-1047 MCE CKD PS

ORDER

This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 

302(c)(21).

On June 15, 2016, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which 

were served on the parties and which contained notice to the parties that any objections to the 

findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Objections to the findings 

and recommendations have been filed.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this 

court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the 

court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper 

analysis.

/////

/////

Case 2:16-cv-01047-MCE-CKD Document 16 Filed 07/06/16 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed June 15, 2016 are adopted in full; 

2. This action is remanded to the Superior Court of California, County of Placer; and 

3. The motion to vacate judgment (ECF No. 6) is denied for lack of subject matter 

jurisdiction.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 5, 2016

Case 2:16-cv-01047-MCE-CKD Document 16 Filed 07/06/16 Page 2 of 2