Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-05295/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-05295-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Eric Nguyen
Plaintiff
Power Advocate, Inc.
Defendant
Power Advocate, Inc. Employee Benefit Plan
Defendant
Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada
Defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

JOINT STIPULATION REGARDING FURTHER EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

Case No. 2-14-CV-557 JCS

Gordon & Rees LLP

275 Battery Street, Suite 2000

San Francisco, CA 94111

JORDAN ALTURA (SBN: 209431)

jaltura@gordonrees.com

AMY MACLEAR (SBN: 215638)

amaclear@gordonrees.com

GORDON & REES LLP

275 Battery Street, Suite 2000

San Francisco, CA 94111

Telephone: (415) 986-5900

Facsimile: (415) 986-8054

Attorneys for Defendants

POWER ADVOCATE, INC. and POWER ADVOCATE, 

INC. EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLAN 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ERIC NGUYEN, an individual,

Plaintiff, 

v. 

SUN LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY OF 

CANADA; POWER ADVOCATE, INC; 

POWER ADVOCATE, INC. EMPLOYEE 

BENEFIT PLAN

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 3-14-cv-05295 JCS

JOINT STIPULATION REGARDING

FURTHER EXTENSION OF TIME TO 

RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

Case 3:14-cv-05295-JST Document 16 Filed 01/15/15 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 -1-

JOINT STIPULATION REGARDING FURTHER EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

Case No. 2-14-CV-557 JCS

Gordon & Rees LLP

275 Battery Street, Suite 2000

San Francisco, CA 94111

Plaintiff ERIC NGUYEN (“Plaintiff”) served the Complaint in this matter on Defendants 

POWER ADVOCATE, INC. and POWER ADVOCATE, INC. EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLAN

(“Defendants”), on December 8, 2014. The response was therefore due on December 29, 2014.

In accordance with Civil Local Rule 6.1, Plaintiff and Defendants previously stipulated

that Defendants shall have up to and including January 15, 2015 to answer or otherwise respond 

to the Complaint. During this time, the parties, through counsel, engaged in discussions geared 

toward a possible informal resolution.

The parties’ efforts toward an information resolution are still underway and therefore, 

they stipulate pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6.1 to a further extension of time to January 30, 2015 

for Defendants to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint.

Respectfully submitted, 

Dated: January 14, 2015 THE GREY LAW FIRM, P.C. 

By: /s/ P. Lauren Ruby

Rebecca Grey

P. Lauren Ruby

Attorneys for Plaintiff ERIC NGUYEN

Dated: January 14. 2015 GORDON & REES LLP

By: /s/ Amy Maclear

Jordan Altura

Amy Maclear

Attorneys for Defendants

POWER ADVOCATE, INC. and POWER 

ADVOCATE, INC. EMPLOYEE BENEFIT 

PLAN

Case 3:14-cv-05295-JST Document 16 Filed 01/15/15 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 -2-

JOINT STIPULATION REGARDING FURTHER EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

Case No. 2-14-CV-557 JCS

Gordon & Rees LLP

275 Battery Street, Suite 2000

San Francisco, CA 94111

ATTESTATION

I attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from the other 

Signatory, which shall serve in lieu of their signature on the document.

Dated: January 14, 2015 /s/ Amy Maclear

Amy Maclear

1096632/20086738v.1 1101891/21878442v.1 IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: 1/15/15 /s/ Joseph C. Spero 

 Chief United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:14-cv-05295-JST Document 16 Filed 01/15/15 Page 3 of 3