Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_07-cv-04424/USCOURTS-cand-4_07-cv-04424-6/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Anpec Electronics Corp.
Counter-claimant
Maxim Integrated Products, Inc.
Counter-defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO STAY

Case No. 07-CV-04424-PJH

David M. Barkan (CA Bar No. 160825) 

barkan@fr.com 

Fish & Richardson P.C. 

500 Arguello Street 

Redwood City, CA 94063 

Telephone: 650.839.5070 

Facsimile: 650.839.5071 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

MAXIM INTEGRATED PRODUCTS, INC. 

Ming-Tao Yang (CA Bar No. 221295) 

ming.yang@finnegan.com 

FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, 

 GARRETT & DUNNER, L.L.P. 

3300 Hillview Avenue 

Palo Alto, California 94304 

Telephone: 650.849.6600 

Facsimile: 650.849.6666 

E. Robert Yoches (Pro Hac Vice) 

bob.yoches@finnegan.com 

FINNEGAN HENDERSON FARABOW, 

 GARRETT & DUNNER L.L.P. 

900 New York Avenue NW 

Washington, DC 20001-4413 

Telephone: 202.408.4000 

Facsimile: 202.408.4400 

Attorneys for Defendant 

ANPEC ELECTRONICS CORP. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

MAXIM INTEGRATED PRODUCTS, INC., 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

ANPEC ELECTRONICS CORP., 

Defendant. 

 CASE NO. 07-CV-04424-PJH 

JOINT STIPULATION AND 

[PROPOSED] ORDER TO STAY 

 

Case 4:07-cv-04424-PJH Document 70 Filed 08/18/08 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2 JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO STAY

Case No. 07-CV-04424-PJH

Plaintiff Maxim Integrated Products, Inc. and Defendant Anpec Electronics Corp., jointly 

request that the Court stay this case for 60 days. The parties have reached an agreement in principle 

to settle this matter and have executed a memorandum of understanding. The parties are now 

diligently working toward reducing the memorandum of understanding to a formal settlement 

agreement. The requested stay will allow the parties to complete and execute the settlement 

agreement without further litigation expense to the parties or burden on the Court. A proposed order 

accompanies this stipulation. 

 Respectfully submitted, 

Dated: August 15, 2008 

FISH & RICHARDSON P.C. 

By: /s/ David M. Barkan David M. Barkan 

 Attorneys for Plaintiff 

Dated: August 15, 2008 

FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, 

 GARRETT & DUNNER, L.L.P. 

By: /s/ Ming-Tao Yang 

 Ming-Tao Yang 

 Attorneys for Defendant 

DECLARATION

 Pursuant to General Order No. 45, Section X(b) regarding signatures, I attest under penalty 

of perjury that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from David M. Barkan. 

Dated: August 15, 2008 

 FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, 

 GARRETT & DUNNER, L.L.P. 

By: /s/ Ming-Tao Yang 

 Ming-Tao Yang 

 Attorneys for Defendant 

Case 4:07-cv-04424-PJH Document 70 Filed 08/18/08 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 [PROPOSED] ORDER TO STAY

Case No. 07-CV-04424-PJH

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

MAXIM INTEGRATED PRODUCTS, INC., 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

ANPEC ELECTRONICS CORP., 

Defendant. 

 CASE NO. 07-CV-04424-PJH 

[PROPOSED] ORDER TO STAY 

 

 Pursuant to the parties’ joint stipulation dated August 15, 2008, IT IS ORDERED that this 

case be stayed for 60 days from the date of this Order. 

 IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: 

 Phyllis J. Hamilton 

 United States District Court Judge 

8/18/08

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton

Case 4:07-cv-04424-PJH Document 70 Filed 08/18/08 Page 3 of 3