Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-02379/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-02379-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Damien Lee Davis
Petitioner
F Foulk
Respondent

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DAMIEN LEE DAVIS,

Petitioner,

v.

F FOULK,

Respondent.

No. 2:15-cv-2379 TLN CKD P

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Petitioner commenced this action by filing a motion for extension of time. (ECF No. 1.) 

By order filed November 25, 2015, petitioner was granted thirty days to file a petition that 

complied with federal pleading requirements, or face dismissal of this action. The thirty-day 

period has now expired, and petitioner has not filed a petition or otherwise responded to the 

court’s order. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without 

prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 

after being served with these findings and recommendations, petitioner may file written 

objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s 

Findings and Recommendations.” Petitioner is advised that failure to file objections within the

Case 2:15-cv-02379-TLN-CKD Document 6 Filed 01/05/16 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 

F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

Dated: January 5, 2016

2/davi2379.fta.hab

_____________________________________

CAROLYN K. DELANEY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:15-cv-02379-TLN-CKD Document 6 Filed 01/05/16 Page 2 of 2