Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-10-06099/USCOURTS-ca4-10-06099-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Michael Scott McRae
Appellant
United States of America
Appellee

Document Text:

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-6099

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

MICHAEL SCOTT MCRAE,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard,

Senior District Judge. (5:97-cr-00094-H-6)

Submitted: March 30, 2010 Decided: April 12, 2010

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael Scott McRae, Appellant Pro Se. Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., 

Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 10-6099 Doc: 11 Filed: 04/12/2010 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Michael Scott McRae appeals the district court’s order

finding him ineligible for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C.

§ 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no 

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated 

by the district court. United States v. McRae, No. 5:97-cr00094-H-6 (E.D.N.C. Dec. 30, 2009). We deny McRae’s motion to 

hold his appeal in abeyance and dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented 

in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Appeal: 10-6099 Doc: 11 Filed: 04/12/2010 Pg: 2 of 2