Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_06-cv-06809/USCOURTS-cand-4_06-cv-06809-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
On Semiconductor Corporation
Defendant
T3 Technical Sales
Defendant
Yield Dynamics, Inc.
Plaintiff

Document Text:

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

RUSSO &

HALE LLP

Palo Alto, 

California Stipulation and [Proposed] Order 1 Case No. C 06-06809 CW

13305948.2.BUSINESS

JACK RUSSO (SBN. 96068) 

TIM C. HALE (SBN. 114905) 

RUSSO & HALE LLP 

401 Florence Street 

Palo Alto, CA 94301 

Telephone: (650) 327-9800 

Facsimile: (650) 327-3737 

Email: jrusso@computerlaw.com 

Email: thale@computerlaw.com 

Attorneys for Plaintiff YIELD DYNAMICS, INC. 

CHRIS SCOTT GRAHAM (SBN. 114498) 

DECHERT LLP 

1117 California Avenue 

Palo Alto, CA 94304-1106 

Telephone: (650) 813-4800 

Facsimile: (650) 813-4848 

Email: chris.scott.graham@dechert.com 

Attorneys for Defendants, 

ON SEMICONDUCTOR CORP. and 

T3 TECHNICAL SALES 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

OAKLAND DIVISION 

YIELD DYNAMICS, INC., a California 

corporation, 

 Plaintiff, 

 vs. 

ON SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION, a 

Delaware corporation, and T3 TECHNICAL 

SALES, a California limited liability corporation, 

 Defendants. 

 

Case No.: C 06-06809 CW 

JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER TO STAY 

ACTION PENDING REISSUE OF THE 

PATENT-IN-SUIT 

STIPULATION 

 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the parties through their 

undersigned counsel, that: 

1. Plaintiff Yield Dynamics, Inc. (“YDI”) represents that on October 22, 2004, it filed an application 

with the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“PTO”) seeking a reissue of the patent-in-suit, 

U.S. Patent No. 6,470,229 (“’229 Patent”). YDI represents that said application is currently under 

consideration by the PTO, and that the PTO has informed YDI that the matter would be addressed in 

the near future. 

2. Upon consideration of the status of the reissue application, the parties agree that a stay of the instant 

action pending a decision on such reissue application for the ‘229 Patent is warranted by the 

principles of expediency and judicial economy. 

Case 4:06-cv-06809-CW Document 20 Filed 01/11/07 Page 1 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

& HALE LLP lto, California Stipulation and [Proposed] Order 2 Case No. 4:06-cv-04579 SBA

13305948.2.BUSINESS

3. The parties respectfully request that the Court stay all proceedings in the instant action until the PTO 

issues its final decision on the currently pending reissue application for the ‘229 Patent. Upon 

issuance of said final decision, the parties agree to promptly reinstitute the action in this Court. 

4. Not withstanding the stay of proceedings, no later than February 16, 2007, YDI shall provide 

Defendants with an identification of each “Accused Instrumentality” as specified under Patent L.R. 

3-1. However, YDI will not be required at this time to provide its disclosure of asserted claims and 

preliminary infringement contentions. 

5. No later than March 16, 2007, Defendants agree to promptly provide to YDI any materials that they 

believe may be prior art as to any of the claims in the current ‘229 Patent or the reissue application 

so as to allow such materials, if possible, to be considered by the PTO as part of the reissue decision. 

Nothing herein shall obligate Defendants, however, to identify any alleged prior art during said stay 

period, but if they do, they shall disclose it to YDI as set forth above. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED: 

RUSSO & HALE LLP DECHERT LLP 

By: /S/ By: /S/ 

 Tim C. Hale Chris Scott Graham 

Attorneys for Plaintiff Attorneys for Defendants 

YIELD DYNAMICS, INC. ON SEMICONDUCTOR CORP. and 

 T3 TECHNICAL SALES 

Dated: January 8, 2007 Dated: January 8, 2007 

VERIFICATION OF AUTHORIZATION TO SIGN AND FILE: 

 On January 8, 2007, Chris Scott Graham authorized me to sign and electronically file this document 

on behalf of all parties. 

 RUSSO & HALE LLP 

 By: /S/ 

 Tim Hale 

Case 4:06-cv-06809-CW Document 20 Filed 01/11/07 Page 2 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

& HALE LLP lto, California Stipulation and [Proposed] Order 3 Case No. 4:06-cv-04579 SBA

13305948.2.BUSINESS

ORDER 

 Based on the Stipulation of the parties as set forth above, and good cause therefore shown, IT IS SO 

ORDERED. A Case Management Conference will be held on April 27, 2007, at 1:30 p.m. 

 1/11/07 

Date: 

 United States District Court Judge

Case 4:06-cv-06809-CW Document 20 Filed 01/11/07 Page 3 of 3