Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-02158/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-02158-2/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Method Products, Inc.
Plaintiff
Prolubes, LLC
Defendant
Truescents, LLC
Defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT 

PREJUDICE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

Case No. C-06-2158 CRB

SF:134755.3

WINSTON & STRAWN LLP 

Andrew P. Bridges (SBN: 122761) 

Jennifer A. Golinveaux (SBN: 203056) 

Matthew A. Scherb (SBN: 237461) 

101 California Street, Suite 3900 

San Francisco, CA 94111-5894 

Telephone: 415-591-1000 

Facsimile: 415-591-1400 

abridges@winston.com; jgolinveaux@winston.com; 

mscherb@winston.com 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

METHOD PRODUCTS, INC. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

METHOD PRODUCTS, INC., 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

TRUESCENTS, LLC and 

PROLUBES, LLC

Defendants. 

 

Case No. C-06-2158 CRB 

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL 

WITHOUT PREJUDICE AND 

[PROPOSED] ORDER

STIPULATION

 Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a), Plaintiff Method Products, Inc. and Defendants 

Truescents, LLC and Prolubes, LLC stipulate to voluntary dismissal of this action without 

prejudice subject to the terms of the parties’ settlement agreement. 

 The parties further stipulate, and request that the Court order, that the Court retain 

jurisdiction over matters contained in the parties’ settlement agreement for the purpose of 

enforcing, or adjudicating disputes arising from, the parties’ settlement agreement. 

Case 3:06-cv-02158-CRB Document 17 Filed 06/20/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT 

PREJUDICE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

Case No. C-06-2158 CRB

SF:134755.3

Dated: June 16, 2006 WINSTON & STRAWN LLP 

By: /s/ 

Andrew P. Bridges 

Jennifer A. Golinveaux 

Matthew A. Scherb 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

METHOD PRODUCTS, INC. 

Dated: June 16, 2006 COOPER, WHITE & COOPER 

By: /s/ 

Robert A. Padway 

Attorneys for Defendants 

TRUESCENTS, LLC (sued herein as 

TRUESCENTS, LLC and PROLUBES, 

LLC) 

ATTESTATION OF CONCURRENCE

 I, Jennifer A. Golinveaux, declare under penalty of perjury that concurrence in the filing 

of this document has been obtained from Robert A. Padway, attorney for Defendants. 

Dated: June 16, 2006 /s/ 

Jennifer A. Golinveaux 

Attorney for Plaintiff 

METHOD PRODUCTS, INC. 

ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED that all claims are hereby 

dismissed without prejudice subject to the terms of the parties’ settlement agreement. 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court retains 

jurisdiction over matters contained in the parties’ settlement agreement for the purpose of 

enforcing, or adjudicating disputes arising from, the parties’ settlement agreement. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: ______________, 2006 ___________________________________ 

 CHARLES R. BREYER 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

June 20

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Charles R. Breyer

Case 3:06-cv-02158-CRB Document 17 Filed 06/20/06 Page 2 of 2