Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-01185/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-01185-5/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Jose Miguel Padilla
Petitioner
Jeff Wrigley
Respondent

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOSE MIGUEL PADILLA,

Petitioner,

v.

JEFF WRIGLEY,

Respondent.

 /

CV F 06-1185 LJO SMS HC

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO

ENTER JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF

PETITIONER AND CLOSE CASE

[Docs. 11, 12]

Petitioner is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. 

On November 13, 2006, the Magistrate Judge issued Findings and Recommendations

recommending that the instant petition for writ of habeas corpus be granted. On January 19,

2007, the Findings and Recommendations were adopted in full and Respondent was directed

consider the appropriateness of transferring Petitioner to an RRC in light of the factors set forth

in 18 U.S.C. § 3621(b), not excluding any other factors deemed appropriate by the BOP, without

reference to the BOP policy promulgated in December 2002 and without reference to the BOP’s

February 14, 2005, amendment to 28 C.F.R. § 570.21. Respondent was directed to make this

determination on or before March 31, 2007. (Court Doc. 10.) 

On March 2, 2007, Respondent filed a notice of verification of compliance with the

Court’s January 19, 2007, order. (Court Doc. 9.) Respondent submits a form entitled

“Institutional Referral for CCC Placement,” dated February 6, 2007, which indicates that

Case 1:06-cv-01185-LJO -SMS Document 13 Filed 06/04/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Petitioner was evaluated “without reference to the time constraints imposed by 28 C.F.R. §

570.20-21 or the 2002 and 2005 Community Corrections Policies.” Attachment 1, Court Doc.

12. As a result of this evaluation, it was recommended that Petitioner spend 60-90 days in an

RRC prior to his release. 

Because Petitioner has been evaluated in compliance with the Court’s January 19, 2007,

the action shall be terminated. Thus, it is HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of Court enter

judgment in favor of Petitioner and CLOSE the case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 4, 2007 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill 

b9ed48 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-01185-LJO -SMS Document 13 Filed 06/04/07 Page 2 of 2