Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_16-cv-00392/USCOURTS-caed-2_16-cv-00392-3/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Jesus Betanzo Basilio
Plaintiff
City of Fairfield
Defendant
City of Fairfield Police Department
Defendant
Walt Tibbet
Defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 

1

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME 

TO EXCHANGE RULE 26 INITIAL DISCLOSURES Basilio v. City of Fairfield, et. al., USDC Eastern Dist. Case No. 2:16-cv-00392-JAM-EFB 

Gregory M. Fox, State Bar No. 070876 

Parry A. Stender Black, State Bar No. 291472 

BERTRAND, FOX, ELLIOT, OSMAN & WENZEL 

The Waterfront Building 

2749 Hyde Street 

San Francisco, California 94109 

Telephone: (415) 353-0999 

Facsimile: (415) 353-0990 

gfox@bfesf.com 

pblack@bfesf.com 

Attorneys for Defendants 

City of Fairfield, City of Fairfield Police Department 

and Chief Walt Tibbet 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

JESUS BETANZO BASILIO 

 Plaintiff, 

v. 

CITY OF FAIRFIELD, CITY OF FAIRFIELD 

POLICE DEPARTMENT, WALT TIBBET, 

DOES 1 TO 100 

 Defendants. 

Case No. 2:16-cv-00392-JAM-EFB 

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME 

TO EXCHANGE RULE 26 INITIAL 

DISCLOSURES 

Honorable John A. Mendez 

Plaintiff JESUS BETANZO BASILIO and Defendants CITY OF FAIRFIELD, CITY OF 

FAIRFIELD POLICE DEPARTMENT1, WALT TIBBET (hereinafter “DEFENDANTS”), by and 

through their counsel of record, hereby represent to the Court as follows: 

The parties filed a Joint Status Report Pursuant to Standing Order on June 3, 2016. In it, 

Plaintiffs requested that parties exchange Rule 26 initial disclosures on July 15, 2016 and Defendants 

proposed to exchange disclosures per the default deadlines of the Federal Rules. 

Defendants filed a Motion to Dismiss on April 11, 2016. That Motion was set for hearing on 

 

1

 The Fairfield Police Department is a department of the CITY OF FAIRFIELD and is not a separate 

legal entity. The CITY thus stipulates on behalf of the “Fairfield Police Department”. 

Case 2:16-cv-00392-JAM-EFB Document 20 Filed 07/15/16 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME 

TO SUBMIT JOINT STATUS REPORT

Basilio v. City of Fairfield, et. al., USDC Eastern Dist. Case No. 2:16-cv-00392-JAM-EFB 

June 14, 2016, but the matter was ordered submitted without argument on June 13, 2016. No Order on 

that Motion has been issued and no Case Management Conference is on calendar. 

Because the pleadings in this case are not yet settled, the parties therefore stipulate and request 

that the deadline to exchange Rule 26 initial disclosures be set for 30 days after receiving a decision on 

Defendants’ pending Motion to Dismiss. 

Dated: July 14, 2016 BERTRAND, FOX, ELLIOT, OSMAN & 

WENZEL 

By: /s/ Parry Black 

 Gregory M. Fox 

Parry A. Black 

Attorneys for Defendants 

CITY OF FAIRFIELD, CITY OF FAIRFIELD 

POLICE DEPARTMENT AND CHIEF WALT 

TIBBET 

Dated: July 14, 2016 LIFE LAW GROUP, LLP 

 By: /s/ Michael Pierson (as authorized on 7/13/16)

 Michael Pierson 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

JESUS BETANZO BASILIO 

ELECTRONIC CASE FILING ATTESTATION 

 I, Parry A. Black, am the ECF user whose identification and password are being used to file the 

foregoing documents. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 131(e), I hereby attest that concurrence in the filing 

of these documents has been obtained from each of its Signatories. 

Dated: July 14, 2016 /s/ Parry A. Black 

 Parry A. Black

 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: July 14, 2016 /s/ John A. Mendez 

 DISTRICT JUDGE JOHN A. MENDEZ 

Case 2:16-cv-00392-JAM-EFB Document 20 Filed 07/15/16 Page 2 of 2