Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_23-cv-02480/USCOURTS-caed-2_23-cv-02480-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Jorge Aguilar Santoyo
Petitioner
Sutter County
Respondent

Document Text:

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

JORGE AGUILAR SANTOYO, 

Petitioner, 

v. 

SUTTER COUNTY, 

Respondent. 

No. 2:23-cv-02480-EFB (HC) 

ORDER AND FINDINGS AND 

RECOMMENDATIONS 

Petitioner proceeds without counsel in an action brought under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. This 

proceeding was referred to this court by Local Rule 302 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). 

 On April 24, 2024, the court dismissed the petition with leave to amend within 30 days. 

ECF No. 5. The time for acting has now passed and petitioner has not filed an amended 

complaint or otherwise responded to the court’s order. Thus, it appears that petitioner is unable 

or unwilling to cure the defects in the petition. 

 Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Clerk of Court randomly assign a district judge to 

this action. 

Further, it is RECOMMENDED that this action be DISMISSED without prejudice for the 

reasons stated in the April 24, 2024 order. 

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 

Case 2:23-cv-02480-DAD-EFB Document 6 Filed 06/17/24 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2 

after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written 

objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned 

“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Any response to the 

objections shall be served and filed within fourteen days after service of the objections. The 

parties are advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to 

appeal the District Court’s order. Turner v. Duncan, 158 F.3d 449, 455 (9th Cir. 1998); Martinez 

v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 

Dated: June 14, 2024 

Case 2:23-cv-02480-DAD-EFB Document 6 Filed 06/17/24 Page 2 of 2