Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_09-cv-01710/USCOURTS-caed-2_09-cv-01710-21/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Matthew Cate
Respondent
Arquimedes Mendoza
Petitioner

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ARQUIMEDES MENDOZA,

Petitioner,

v.

MATTHEW CATE,

Respondents.

No. 2:09-cv-1710 MCE DAD P

ORDER

Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this application for a writ of habeas 

corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate 

Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On July 3, 2014, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which 

were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the 

findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Respondent has filed 

objections to the findings and recommendations, and petitioner has filed a reply.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this 

Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the 

Court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper 

analysis.

/////

Case 2:09-cv-01710-MCE-DB Document 84 Filed 03/11/15 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed July 3, 2014 (ECF No. 79), are ADOPTED in 

full; 

2. Respondent’s motion to dismiss (ECF No. 73) is DENIED; and

3. The court declines to issue the certificate of appealability referenced in 28 U.S.C. § 

2253.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: March 10, 2015

Case 2:09-cv-01710-MCE-DB Document 84 Filed 03/11/15 Page 2 of 2