Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_14-cv-02079/USCOURTS-caed-1_14-cv-02079-1/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Mark W. King
Plaintiff
John B. Meek
Defendant

Document Text:

JUDGMENT AND DISMISSAL OF COMPLAINT

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MARK W. KING;

Plaintiff,

 v.

JOHN B. MEEK,

Defendant.

CASE NO. 1:14-cv-02079-AWI-GSA

Honorable Anthony W. Ishii

Courtroom 2

ORDER DISMISSING COMPLAINT WITH 

PREJUDICE AND ENTERING 

JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANT

Date Removed: December 29, 2014

The Order granting Defendant John B. Meek’s Motion to Dismiss the Complaint pursuant to 

Rule 12(b)(2) and 12 (b)(6) was entered by this Court on June 10, 2015. The Court granted Plaintiff 

Mark W. King, Esq. (State Bar No. 242197) leave to amend his complaint within thirty days of 

entry of that Order. Accordingly, Plaintiff was required to file his amended complaint on or before 

July 10, 2015. 

///

///

///

Case 1:14-cv-02079-AWI-GSA Document 10 Filed 07/16/15 Page 1 of 2
2

[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT AND DISMISSAL OF COMPLAINT

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Plaintiff has failed to file an amended complaint and therefore, the complaint in this matter is 

dismissed with prejudice and judgment is entered in favor of Defendant John B. Meek and against 

Plaintiff Mark W. King. Defendant is awarded and shall recover his costs of suit.1

This Order terminates the case. The Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to close this 

case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 16, 2015 

 SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE

 

 

1

The Local Rules of the Eastern District of California state that “[c]osts shall be taxed in 

conformity with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1920.” L.R. 292(a); see Fed.R.Civ.P. 54.

Case 1:14-cv-02079-AWI-GSA Document 10 Filed 07/16/15 Page 2 of 2