Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-00136/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-00136-2/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Hall of Justice
Respondent
Kenneth Mills
Petitioner

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KENNETH MILLS,

Petitioner, No. CIV S-06-0136 LKK EFB P

vs.

HALL OF JUSTICE,

Respondent. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

Petitioner is a state prisoner without counsel seeking a writ of habeas corpus. See

28 U.S.C. § 2254. On February 8, 2006, the court directed petitioner to file an amended petition

naming the proper respondent. On June 19, 2006, petitioner filed a document styled “motion for

hearing.” On July 19, 2006, the court denied that request and gave petitioner 30 days to file an

amended petition naming the proper respondent. The court explained to petitioner that the

proper respondent is the person having immediate custody of him and warned that failure to

comply with the order would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed.

On August 14, 2006, petitioner filed an amended petition naming “Hall of

Justice” as the respondent. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed.

Case 2:06-cv-00136-LKK -EFB Document 18 Filed 08/29/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within 20 days

after being served with these findings and recommendations, petitioner may file written

objections. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and

Recommendations.” Petitioner is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time

may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th

Cir. 1991).

DATED: August 29, 2006.

\004

\mill0136.f&r wrong resp

Case 2:06-cv-00136-LKK -EFB Document 18 Filed 08/29/06 Page 2 of 2