Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_02-cv-01377/USCOURTS-caed-2_02-cv-01377-7/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Francisco Gaile Guyton
Petitioner
Gail Lewis
Respondent

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

FRANCISCO GAILE GUYTON,

Petitioner, No. CIV S-02-1377 FCD GGH P

vs.

GAIL LEWIS, et al.,

Respondent. ORDER

 /

Pending before the court is petitioner’s December 11, 2006, request for relief from

judgment pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b). For the following reasons, this request is

disregarded.

Petitioner was originally represented by counsel in this action. On December 7,

2005, the court denied petitioner’s habeas corpus petition and judgment was entered. Petitioner

did not appeal. On June 5, 2006, petitioner, through counsel, filed a motion to reopen the time to

file an appeal and a request to be relieved as counsel of record. On June 20, 2006, the court

denied petitioner’s motion to reopen the time to file an appeal and granted counsel’s request to be

relieved.

On June 29, 2006, petitioner proceeding pro se filed a motion to reopen the time

for filing an appeal. On August 7, 2006, the court denied this request. On July 17, 2006,

Case 2:02-cv-01377-FCD-GGH Document 63 Filed 12/26/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

petitioner proceeding pro se filed a motion for relief from judgment pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P.

60(b). On November 8, 2006, the court denied this motion.

On December 11, 2006, petitioner filed the pending second motion for relief from

judgment. As demonstrated above, the court has considered several post-judgment motions in

this action. Good cause does not exist to permit petitioner to continue filing post-judgment

motions in this court. Accordingly, petitioner’s December 11, 2006, motion for relief from

judgment is disregarded. Any further motions filed by petitioner in this action shall be

disregarded.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner’s December 11, 2006,

motion for relief from judgment pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) is disregarded. 

DATED: 12/26/06

/s/ Gregory G. Hollows

 

 GREGORY G. HOLLOWS

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

guy1377.den

Case 2:02-cv-01377-FCD-GGH Document 63 Filed 12/26/06 Page 2 of 2