Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca10-88-02656/USCOURTS-ca10-88-02656-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
K-Mart Corporation
Appellee
Jerome Marek
Appellant

Document Text:

FILE,r"'= u . AJ 

mted States Courr of App I.· 

T I ea . ., 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT 

ent.1 Cr:11.' t · 

FEB 12 1990 

JEROME MAREK, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v . 

K-MART CORPORATION, 

Defendant-Appellee. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

ROBERT L. HOECKER 

Clerk 

) No. 88-2656 

) (D.C. No. 87-C-790-B) 

) (N.D. Okla.) 

) 

) 

ORDER AND JUDGMENT* 

Before TACHA, BALDOCK, and BRORBY, Circuit Judges. 

After examining the briefs and appellate reco'rd, this panel 

has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially 

assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 

34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. 

submitted without oral argument. 

The case is therefore ordered 

Plaintiff has appealed from a judgment of the district court 

entered in favor of defendant on his claim under the overtime 

provisions of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), 29 U.S.C. 

§ 207(e) and his pendent claim for breach of contract. On appeal, 

plaintiff has raised numerous arguments challenging, among other 

* This order and judgmen~ has no precedential value and shall 

not be cited, or used . by any court within the Tenth Circuit, 

except for purposes of establishing the doctrines of the law of 

the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. 10th Cir. R. 

36. 3. 

Appellate Case: 88-2656 Document: 01019963046 Date Filed: 02/12/1990 Page: 1 
things, the propriety of summary judgment in defendant's favor on 

the contract claim and the sufficiency of the evidence underlying 

the jury's verdict on the FLSA claim. We have carefully reviewed 

the parties' appellate briefs and the record on appeal, and we 

find no error in any of the challenged determinations. 

Accordingly, the judgment of the United States District Court 

for the Northern District of Oklahoma is AFFIRMED. 

ENTERED FOR THE COURT 

PER CURIAM 

2 

Appellate Case: 88-2656 Document: 01019963046 Date Filed: 02/12/1990 Page: 2