Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-02732/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-02732-19/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Panoptx, Inc.
Counter-claimant
Protective Optics, Inc.
Counter-defendant

Document Text:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONSOLIDATE AND SET HEARING ON PARTIES’

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONSOLIDATE AND SET HEARING ON PARTIES’

SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONS FOR JUNE 15, 2007

CASE NO. C05-02732 CRB

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

PROTECTIVE OPTICS, INC.,

a California corporation

Plaintiff,

v.

PANOPTX INC.,

a California corporation

Defendant.

Case No. C05-02732 CRB

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

TO CONSOLIDATE AND SET HEARING ON

PARTIES’ SUMMARY JUDGMENT

MOTIONS FOR JUNE 15, 2007

Courtroom: 8, 19th Floor

Before: Hon. Charles R. Breyer

[Trial Date: August 6, 2007]

AND RELATED CROSS-ACTION

E. Patrick Ellisen, CA Bar No. 142033

ellisenp@gtlaw.com

Daniel T. McCloskey, CA Bar No. 191944

mccloskeyd@gtlaw.com

GREENBERG TRAURIG LLP

1900 University Avenue 5th Floor

East Palo Alto, CA 94303

Telephone: (650) 328-8500

Facsimile: (650) 328-8508

Brian A. Carpenter, pro hac vice

carpenterb@gtlaw.com

GREENBERG TRAURIG LLP

1200 17th Street, Suite 2400

Denver, CO 80202

Telephone: (303) 572-6500

Facsimile: (303) 572-6540

Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterclaim-Defendant,

PROTECTIVE OPTICS, INC.

Case 3:05-cv-02732-CRB Document 179 Filed 05/22/07 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONSOLIDATE AND SET HEARING ON PARTIES’

SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONS FOR JUNE 15, 2007

CASE NO. C05-02732 CRB

Plaintiff and Counterclaim-Defendant Protective Optics, Inc. and Defendant and

Counterclaimant Panoptx, Inc. (collectively, the “Parties”), by and through their undersigned

attorneys, state and agree as follows:

Whereas, on April 2, 2007, Protective Optics filed a Motion for Partial Summary Judgment of

Infringement which was previously set for May 18, 2007 [Docket No. 125];

Whereas, on April 27, 2007, Panoptx filed a Motion for Partial Summary Judgment of Patent

Invalidity for Failure to Comply With the Enablement Requirement which is set for hearing on June

1, 2007 [Docket No. 145];

Whereas, on May 11, 2007, Protective Optics filed a Motion for Partial Summary Judgment

on Panoptx’s Seventh Affirmative Defense for Patent Invalidity Under 35 U.S.C. §112 which is set

for hearing on June 15, 2007 [Docket No. 163];

Whereas, on May 14, 2007, this Court, sua sponte, rescheduled Protective Optics’ Motion for

Partial Summary Judgment of Infringement for June 1, 2007, at 10:00 a.m., the same date and time as

Panoptx’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment of Patent Invalidity for Failure to Comply with the

Enablement Requirement [Docket No. 165];

Whereas, given the similarity of issues and the common interest in efficiently using the

Court’s and the Parties’ resources, the Parties agree that all three summary judgment motions should

be scheduled for the same date and time and heard on June 15, 2007, at 10:00 a.m., the date on which

Protective Optics’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on Panoptx’s Seventh Affirmative Defense

for Patent Invalidity Under 35 U.S.C. §112 is currently scheduled to be heard;

NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the Parties, subject to

Court approval, as follows, that:

1. the hearings on Protective Optics’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment of

Infringement and Panoptx’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment of Patent

Invalidity for Failure to Comply with the Enablement Requirement shall be

continued and rescheduled for June 15, 2007, at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom 8;

Case 3:05-cv-02732-CRB Document 179 Filed 05/22/07 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONSOLIDATE AND SET HEARING ON PARTIES’

SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONS FOR JUNE 15, 2007

CASE NO. C05-02732 CRB

DATED: May 21, 2007 GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP

By: /s/ Daniel T. McCloskey

Daniel T. McCloskey

Attorneys for Plaintiff and CounterclaimDefendant,

PROTECTIVE OPTICS, INC.

DATED: May 21, 2007 KRIEG, KELLER, SLOAN, REILLEY & ROMAN, LLP

By: /s/

Michael D. Lisi

Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant,

PANOPTX, INC.

I, Daniel T. McCloskey, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file this

Stipulation and [Proposed] Order to Consolidate and Set Hearing On Parties’ Summary Judgment

Motions for June 15, 2007. In compliance with General Order 45, X.B., I hereby attest that Michael

D. Lisi has concurred in this filing.

Dated: May 21, 2007 By: /s/ Daniel T. McCloskey

Daniel T. McCloskey

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated:

HON. CHARLES R. BREYER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

May 21, 2007

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Charles R. Breyer

Case 3:05-cv-02732-CRB Document 179 Filed 05/22/07 Page 3 of 3