Document ID: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_16-cv-01888/USCOURTS-caed-1_16-cv-01888-0/pdf.json

Parties Involved:
Collecto Inc.
Defendant
EOS CCA
Defendant
Sandie Khatkar
Plaintiff

Document Text:

{

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Lee Paul Mankin, IV 

pmankin@paulmankin.com 

LAW OFFICE OF L. PAUL MANKIN IV 

4655 Cass Street 

Suite 112 

San Diego, CA 92109 

Tel: 800-219-3577 

Fax: 323-207-3885 

Attorney for Plaintiff 

SANDIE KHATKAR 

David J. Kaminski (SBN 128509) 

KaminskiD@cmtlaw.com 

Shawn Eldridge (276581) 

EldridgeS@cmtlaw.com 

CARLSON & MESSER LLP 

5959 West Century Boulevard, Suite 1214 

Los Angeles, CA 90045 

(310) 242-2200 Telephone 

(310) 242-2222 Facsimile 

Attorneys for Defendant 

COLLECTO INC., dba EOS, CCA 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SANDIE KHATKAR, 

 Plaintiff, 

 vs. 

COLLECTO, INC. dba EOS CCA, 

and DOES 1-10, inclusive, 

 Defendant. 

 Case No. 1:16-cv-01888-LJO-BAM 

SECOND STIPULATION TO EXTEND 

TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT; 

ORDER 

 Complaint Removed: December 19, 2016 

 Current Response Due: January 17, 2017 

 New Response Deadline: January 31, 2017 

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED between Plaintiff SANDIE KHATKAR 

(“Plaintiffs”) and Defendants COLLECTO INC., dba EOS, CCA (“Defendant”), through 

their respective counsel, as follows: 

WHEREAS, Defendant removed the Complaint on December 19, 2016; 

Case 1:16-cv-01888-LJO-BAM Document 7 Filed 01/18/17 Page 1 of 2
{

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

WHEREAS, a Stipulation to Extend Time to Answer was filed on December 21, 

2016, extending the deadline for Defendant to respond to January 17, 2017 [ Docket No. 

5]; 

WHEREAS, Defendant, due to the press of business, needs additional time to 

review documents to assist in an early resolution of the entire matter; 

WHEREAS, Plaintiff and Defendant (hereinafter referred to as “Parties”) have met 

and conferred and agree good cause exists to extend the deadline for Defendant to 

respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint to January 31, 2017; 

WHEREAS, no party claims prejudice as a result of the extension of time; 

WHEREFORE, the Parties stipulate and agree that Defendant shall have an 

extension of time up to and including January 31, 2017 within which to respond to 

Plaintiff’s Complaint. 

 LAW OFFICE OF L. PAUL MANKIN

Dated: January 17, 2017 By: /s/ L. Paul Mankin 

 L. Paul Mankin 

 Attorney for Plaintiff 

 SANDIE KHATKAR 

 CARLSON & MESSER, LLP

Dated: January 17, 2017 By: /s/ Shawn Eldridge 

 David J. Kaminski 

 Shawn Eldridge 

 Attorneys for Defendant 

COLLECTO INC. dba EOS, CCA

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED THAT the Parties stipulate and agree that Defendant shall have an 

extension of time up to and including January 31, 2017 within which to respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint. 

Dated: January 18, 2017 /s/ Barbara A. McAuliffe UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

 

Case 1:16-cv-01888-LJO-BAM Document 7 Filed 01/18/17 Page 2 of 2